Graham Connolly: The concept is kind of like, to rehumanise the dehumanised.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I’ve always tried to do.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the government is always trying to do the opposite. The government’s always trying to paint you as a monster!

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what’s concerning now is the threshold of political policing. As I’ve already mentioned, there’s nothing they won’t do to paint you as a monster! There’s nothing they won’t cook up.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s right.

 

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like I’ve had everything, almost everything under the sun thrown at me at this point.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, but I’ve tried to keep my chin up and just take it all in my stride. The thing is, as long as you can always explain, as long as you have the ability to still communicate with your audience and explain your point of view then you’re generally okay. But that’s the problem with censorship. They shut down your ability to explain the full story.

 

Graham Connolly: And that kind of leads me, actually, to something I did want to ask you about, is that for a while, you seem to take a back step, or you took a step away a little bit, or maybe not a step away completely from fighting. You’re always been a fighter. From Tom’s approach, maybe, like, you might not necessarily agreed with his approach for a while and maybe took a back step or stepped away from it. Would that be a fair way of putting it, or?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It happened sort of especially as we moved into the pandemic and the Covid fiasco.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it just seemed like there were new priorities at that time. It seemed like the whole public consciousness moved away from political ideology and was focused more on vaccine conspiracies and survival.

 

And so that’s kind of where I refocused myself for a while.

 

But then when all of that settled down and kind of people realised that it was all just smoke and mirrors, most of it, then the priority became politics once more, and it was mostly about that.

 

Also initially, I didn’t believe the ninja outfits. The black block.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t think owning the neo-Nazi label would work. I thought that people were potentially too Hoodwinked into associating Nazis with a certain bogeyman, with a certain evil, and that was so ingrained in the consciousness of people, I doubted they were able to ever accept Nazism as anything other than evil.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And you’d never get past that first sentence, almost like you literally, it’s just cognitive dissonance kicks in straight away and you can’t break through that wall.

 

Blair Cottrell: Pretty much. And I spoke already about the government’s internal counterinsurgency efforts. Part of that is also to when they isolate groups like Tom’s group, groups like White Australia, National Socialist Network. When they isolate, they try to radicalise it further. So they try to push you into taking more radical position, doing more radical stuff, saying more radical things, because that, in their view, isolates you more from your resource base, which is the public.

 

And so I saw going down the trajectory, initially I thought taking on more radical position was giving the government what they wanted.

 

But what I wasn’t, or what I underestimated was the ability of Tom, of Jacob, Jack Eltis up in Sydney, their ability to still appear cool and stay popular even while being more radical. I underestimated that. I didn’t think that was really possible. But I should have, because you remember Ziz? Ziz was this Australian cultural phenomenon who was like super aesthetic. He gave birth to the bodybuilding aesthetics movement. His brother’s still alive.

 

But anyway, he said that if you look good enough, you can basically sell anything. You can get away with anything. And I was kind of trying to push that message for a while, too. I was trying to get the guys to be as healthy as possible, get fit, present themselves well.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not only to present a more professional appearance, but to appear as something that was respectable to the public and it was a good way to sell any message is to look good. But I think by putting that out there and by Tom basically understanding that, in essence, he was able to incorporate that, and he’s almost made Nazism cool somehow. I didn’t think it was possible.

 

Graham Connolly: When I first started, I was still at the stage where I was calling myself National Socialist, but when somebody would call me a Nazi, I thought I was very clever. When I turned around and I’d say:

 

“Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! That’s just a derogatory name for a National Socialist. Like, you’re the type of person that doesn’t use derogatory language, I thought, but here you are, the media is calling me a Nazi. I’m a National Socialist. That’s just derogatory!”

 

And I said this to the boys, thinking I was all clever and all that. The boys, like:

 

“Nah! Just own it! Like literally just own it!”

 

[05:20]

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think there’s an effort to rebrand Nazism or to reclaim National Socialism as a genuinely popular counterculture to the current system. And there’s been real progress towards doing that. I initially, I was wrong. I initially didn’t think that was possible. And there is still a large part of me that isn’t sure if it’s possible in the long term.

 

If you look at what’s actually happened in response to the attempt to popularise National Socialism, there’s been, as I’ve explained, even a higher threshold of political policing.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom’s in jail now.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The guys in his group are experiencing all sorts of legal problems. There’s charges left, right and centre. A lot of the charges are just cooked up out of nothing.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s vicious corruption and it’s going to probably go further.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: But at the same time, I don’t think that’s a reason to give up because that would mean, well, every time the government cooks up a bunch of bullshit you’ve just got to give up. It doesn’t make sense.

 

Graham Connolly: So yeah, historically it that that sort of policing has its limits too.

 

Blair Cottrell: It does because they can’t. The problem, the government right now is walking a tightrope. They’re running the risk of delegitimizing their own system in order to take out a rising popular nationalist group. And there’s kind of, there’s arguably only so far they can go before it basically threatens the foundations of this so-called democracy. I’m under no illusions about living in a democracy. I don’t believe that the concept of a democracy is anything solid, anything like truly observable. It’s kind of like a catchphrase that people use to try to pretend that they’re representing freedom and air system of opinion or representative government. But what I’ve experienced since the beginning of my political activity is just nothing but discrimination, corruption, lies and just constant bullshit basically.

 

So I haven’t experienced any democracy.

 

Graham Connolly: No, you haven’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. No, but I don’t think there’s any limits, put it that way. The boys seem to think that the government has to work within a certain threshold of rules. They pretend they do,

 

Graham Connolly: They don’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I don’t think they actually do. I think they’ll just cook shit up at the end of the day.

 

Graham Connolly: I think that’s why you got to, in a way you got to stay the course because the longer you can stay the course like you have done, for example, the more chance there is for more eyeballs to see you and I think that boils down, down to. If you take, if you boil down National Socialism to what it really is, and that is you’re a working man, I’m a working man, right? We go out, we pay our taxes, we do this. I want my taxes to go to the benefit of my family, my extended family, my people, which is a socialism to an extent. I want to work. I want to work to help those less fortunate. I want to work to help women to stay at home and raise their children. I want to do these things. I want my taxes to go to that sort of thing. I don’t want my taxes to go to millions of Indians coming in to turn my people into a minority here, Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: No sensible person would want that.

 

Graham Connolly: Nope. So deep down, most people are not just White people, most people are National Socialists! Like, if you boil it down to what it actually is, most people are socialists for their own people. Like most people are nationalists. And then the most generous of those nationalists are National Socialists.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, what does socialism mean to you?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, that’s what it means to me is basically that the strong, the healthy are willing to go. I’m willing to work and for the fruits of my labour to go towards my people, my family, my neighbour, my extended family, etc, but that’s who I want to benefit from it. Otherwise it’s slavery to me. Otherwise what I’m doing is slavery.

 

Blair Cottrell: But so what you’re saying is you’re happy to work for an extended community. As long as that community is yours.

 

Graham Connolly: As long as it’s mine. Yeah. And it starts with, I think like when you look at loyalties, how Right-wing loyalties go. So it starts with your immediate family, your extended family, your neighbour, your street, your neighbourhood, your town, your, etc, etc. It grows like that. But it starts with family and then grows out from there. I think that’s my hierarchy of loyalty. When it comes to the Left-wing, their hierarchy of loyalty is whatever the government tells them. Basically. They have no loyalty to their own family, they have no loyalty to their own tribe, their own people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they kind of represent an international socialism. What we call Leftists. I don’t like to use the phrase Leftists, but I do because it means something to standard viewers of podcasts like this. But really all a Leftist is someone who has been effectively conditioned by the system into buying into international socialism.

 

So they’re thinking along the similar lines we are in essence, but to them the group is all of mankind and all the races of mankind. So what they need to do is work for the benefit of other races before their own in order to create this global equality system, which in essence is going to destroy their race!

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: But in their mind that’s a good thing because their race, … And it’s most exemplified by statements made by Australia’s Indian born race discrimination commissioner. He believes that you can’t be racist against White people. It’s not possible because White people have social power. Therefore racism isn’t possible. Like it’s not possible to ethnically discriminate against the power class of White people. Not only is it not possible to do it, but you still should do it because when you discriminate ethnically against White people it brings them down from their position of power and creates a more even playing field for all the other races to compete. So it’s not possible, but you should also do it at the same time. It’s good! [chuckling]

 

[11:24]

 

Graham Connolly: So based on that logic, Nazis can’t be racist because Nazis have the least amount of political power in the current system. Yes, we’re White.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s an interesting thought! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Yes, we’re White. Yes, we’re White. But as a group we have the least amount of political, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You can be racist because the only victims of racism is anyone who’s not White. That’s what he’s saying. It’s because you can only be a victim of racism according to far-Left theory, people like race discrimination Commissioner. You can only be a victim of ethnic discrimination or racism if you’re not White because you don’t have social power.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And this is coming from a guy who’s on almost half a million dollar salary paid by the government to sit in Parliament and say that. [chuckling] Yeah. So who has the social power?

 

Graham Connolly: But you could take the logical cs. I’d like to take that logic to him and say:

 

“So Nazis have no social power in the current climate!”

 

Blair Cottrell: No institutional support.

 

Graham Connolly: No institutional support. The least amount of support from anyone. Nobody’s going to help them out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Their bank accounts get shut down! So much power do they have? [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: So thank you! We can’t be racist! That’s bullshit though, because I’m racist as fuck!

 

Blair Cottrell: What is racism to you?

 

Graham Connolly: It’s just tribalism. It’s just another word like, everybody is tribal!

 

So I think it’s since the dawn of time, since the first villages. Would you protect your village from an approaching warring tribe?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you’d probably be kicked out of the village if you refused to. So there’d be certain incentives.

 

Graham Connolly: You’d be considered a coward!

 

Blair Cottrell: Or you need the village anyway, so you need to protect it. Because most people depend on a community network. There’s a saying that anyone who doesn’t need anyone else to survive is either a wild beast, or a God.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And none of us mortals down here are gods. So and there’s not many people that really qualify as wild beasts either. So we all depend on each other to some extent.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Let’s say you’re an isolated tribe. Let’s say go back as far as you want to go. Like, put yourself in the mind of a caveman, and you’re in the first village. You haven’t even met any other villages, so you don’t even understand war. And then a warring tribe comes and starts to ransack your village or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, you’re gonna fight.

 

Graham Connolly: Your instinct straight away is to protect your children, to protect your wife, to protect your neighbour, protect your, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s necessary in order for a village not to fight amongst., … In order for a tribe to actually maintain cohesion and not split apart, it’s necessary to have an outside enemy.

 

Graham Connolly: It is.

 

Blair Cottrell: Every civilisation, nation in history has had an enemy that has united people against that enemy.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Even our civilisation today, the global civilisation that we call this egalitarian multicultural society, it has an enemy which unites everyone against that enemy. And that enemy is White people!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, White people.

 

Blair Cottrell: You see? So there always needs to be a collective opponent to any civilisation structure. And right now, the creepy thing is that you and I are sitting here, we are that enemy! The society considers us an enemy.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, you do The Joel and Blair Show, and Joel actually tried to introduce us to a book. Carl Schmitt. What was the name of the book? I’m forgetting, but it was basically the “friend and enemy distinction”. That’s what the whole book was about. It was exactly that. It was exactly that! Every group has an enemy.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it almost needs it. That’s if you’re going to unite a series of different nations, it’s much better for them to have a common enemy than it is for them to have a common interest. Because humans are more easily motivated by their negative impulses rather than their good nature. Because humans are more bad than they are good. And the religions of the world understand that better than anyone. Because the way the religions organise people is if you don’t do this, we’re going to torture you. Or if you behave this way, you’re going to burn in hell for all eternity. So it’s fear and self interest which motivates humans. Like, let’s say you’re going to get a few different tribes together and you’re going to say:

 

“Oh, hey, if we all work together, then we’re going to be able to build a really nice civilisation on that next hill over there.”

 

People will be like:

 

“Yeah, okay.”

 

But then if you come and say:

 

“Let us all band together and destroy those evil bastards on the other side of that hill!”

 

Everyone’s there with bells on, you see!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

[15:52]

 

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like, that’s just the way we’re geared. It’s human nature to be more motivated by your negative impulses.

 

However, when you’re aware of that, you can become more. Yeah, you can develop the self control. You can have developed the consciousness to not always give in to your negative impulses. Right. But that’s something for the individual to explore and, it’s in the realm of self mastery.

 

When we’re talking about collective politics, we’re kind of discussing methods where we can actually motivate large groups of people by appealing to their negative impulses, which is essentially what politics is. You’re trying to unite people against a common threat, whether real or imagined. The benefit we have is the threat that we face as a people in this country is a real one! And we don’t have to lie to people. The situation we’re in is a bad one. Our enemy is there. It’s real and it’s aggressive! It’s working against us. So all we have to do is tell the truth! That’s all I’ve ever done is tell the truth!

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And then you don’t have to worry so much about being judged by the enemy either. Like the enemy who has all the power to judge you and to smear your name and to do all this sort of thing. All you have to do is use truth as your shield.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s as simple as that.

 

Graham Connolly: You asked about racism. What is racism? Racism to me is as well, just to come back to that, is that it’s in my interest to defend you.

 

Because if you lose, I lose kind of thing. If you get beaten. Like, if we’re no difference between on a night out, let’s say we’re on a night out, and you get jumped by three or four guys. It’s in my interest, and like, I’m with you. It’s in my interest to defend you, or else we both get bashed. If I defend you, we might lose. We also might win.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: And to me, it’s the same thing on a tribal level.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what the opposite of racism would be running away to save yourself.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: What would you call that as opposed to racism? Individualism?

 

Graham Connolly: Individualism, I suppose.

 

Blair Cottrell: Nihilism?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not believing in anything but yourself.

 

Graham Connolly: There’s a cowardly aspect to it even. Not being racist there’s the cowardly aspect to it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s normal to be interested in self preservation.

 

Graham Connolly: And self preservation expands to the preservation of your tribe. It has to. Because if your tribe survives, you have a better chance of surviving. You know, you survive in numbers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Especially through the winter.

 

Graham Connolly: Especially through winter. And we’re Europeans.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen, whose philosophy. Whose idea was it? It might have been David Duke. His idea was that the reason different races developed on the earth was mostly due to climate conditions.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I agree with that. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You do agree with that?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, 100%. Yeah. So we had to figure out how to survive winters. Do you know how dark it is in Ireland in the winter?

 

Blair Cottrell: And cold.

 

Graham Connolly: You can’t grow anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: You got to work together to stockpile food. You got to keep the food protected.

 

Graham Connolly: You got to figure out how to make that food not go off.

 

Blair Cottrell: You got to make weapons, you got to make shelters.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Whereas if you’re in the eternal summer where you can just pick berries all year round. [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! Just open up your teepee and fucking shoot a deer on the way past.

 

Blair Cottrell: It makes sense. However, I don’t believe the different races of man are purely the result of climate conditions.

 

Graham Connolly: Probably not. I think it’s more IQ. I think IQ is probably, has climate as a big factor, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, because I said earlier on in the show that I lean towards creationism, I think we all did stem not from the same organism. I Think we’ve stemmed from slightly different, either experiments or organisms.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I agree with that as well. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

So there’s a multitude of reasons why there’s different races on the world on the earth.

 

Graham Connolly: Like this out of Africa theory is complete nonsense!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s already been debunked.

 

Graham Connolly: The out of Africa nonsense, absolute garbage!

 

Blair Cottrell: It was a lie from the start. It was just a lie to try to get everyone mixed race, basically. And why would, like, why do you think? Because we were talking about that before the show started, I remember. What’s this big urge to sell the mixed race person as like a desirable thing? What’s that about?

 

Graham Connolly: I think it’s the “ultimate goyim”.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that?

 

Graham Connolly: Because it’s the ultimate slave race. Because you end up having no tribal instincts. So there’s less opportunity for uprisings.

 

Blair Cottrell: No national loyalties.

 

[20:14]

 

Graham Connolly: No national loyalties. No racial loyalties. No tribal loyalties. Get rid of tribalism altogether. If everybody’s just the same shade of brown, then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone’s a number on screen.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And I think you’re still going to have this ruling class of jews more than likely. Fake jews. And what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to create their promised goyim. Like they’re the ultimate slave, really isn’t it? Beasts in human form. That’s what I think it is. I think, the whole point is to create the goyim, like to create this biblical goyim.

 

Because right now White people don’t fit that they don’t fit into that. Like you can’t be sending rockets into space and shit and be considered a goyiom. [chuckling] You know what I mean? To be considered a beast in human form, we don’t fit the mould.

 

And so we need to be put in our place. We need to be downgraded. We need to be devolved into a goyim, like into a beast in human form. Into a slave to serve.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s curious though, because in Judaic religious text it says that’s what non-jews are already.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But it, as you said, it doesn’t really fit. That story doesn’t really add up at the moment. So there’s an urge to make that a reality.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s my theory. I think that’s right. I think they’re trying to fulfill that, like as if it’s a prophecy rather than what’s there at the moment.

 

Blair Cottrell: In Mein Kampf, Hitler writes on this subject that if there’s only one race on the earth which preserves its identity while all the others interbreed, the race which preserves itself must, with mathematical certainty, rise to become master of the Earth.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely! I agree with that. Yeah. And makes sense, doesn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, Hitler was a big, I don’t want to say enthusiast. That’s not the right way to describe it, but he was big on encouraging people to read The Protocols of zion, which. Have you read those?

 

Graham Connolly: Parts of yeah, over the years. Usually in blog posts and stuff like this.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s of course called a forgery. They say that it’s not real. But what the Protocols are if you’re watching this and you have never heard of it, I’d be surprised if you haven’t. I mean, if you’ve arrived at the Offaly Offensive podcast, you don’t know what that is, I’d be surprised.

 

But for the odd viewer who doesn’t, it was said to be the written minutes of a meeting of jewish intellectuals who basically detail their methods and plans for taking over human society, or non-jewish human societies.

 

 

 

Graham Connolly: If it’s forgery, how is it so accurate? [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, that’s what was said by characters like, I believe, a US President, or perhaps it was even Henry Ford, but don’t quote me on that. Someone said they read it and they thought it was very informative. And he was critiqued for it by a journalist at the time saying:

 

“Oh, it’s a forgery. Didn’t you know it’s a forgery?”

 

And the way he [Henry Ford] responded was that he said:

 

“Well, even if it is a forgery, it seems to explain in precise detail exactly what’s happening in the world.”

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly what’s happening! Yeah, that’s what’s crazy! But forgery?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You can look it up online.

 

Graham Connolly: Who went to the effort of forging such a thing?

[See: Guide to Kulchur – The Protocols of the Elders of Zion – Andrew Joyce – Nov 22, 2020 — Transcript]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, apparently it was stolen. The way it was explained to me, it was originally in, I believe, either in Hebrew or Russian, or it was translated into Russian from Hebrew by someone, and it was stolen by a Russian prostitute who was in cohorts or in contact with the people in the meeting somehow.

 

And then that prostitute ended up selling it to somebody else. And it eventually made its way through Europe and was translated into different European languages.

 

And that’s how it came into the hands of Adolf Hitler. And it’s curious because Hitler mentions the protocols specifically in his book Mein Kampf, and he says:

 

“Once The Protocols become the common possession of every German. (In his own words) the jewish menace will be considered as defeated.”

 

So he believed if he could get everyone a copy of the Protocols, to get them to read it and understand what it meant, then they would basically reject Judaism for a thousand years in Germany. They wouldn’t accept it again. They would understand the threat that the jewish people posed to the Germans.

 

Graham Connolly: Because it’s not good enough to just defeat the people. Their ideas have to be defeated.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what I’m saying is Hitler was influenced by the Protocols, big time. He believed them. He didn’t think they were a forgery. And that’s got to be one of the primary motivators which drove Hitler to take the action that he took. Which is pretty significant when you think about it. It’s arguable, but if Hitler never came into contact with the Protocols of zion and never believed it, then would he have been the man he ended up being? Who knows?

 

Graham Connolly: Interesting!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. But the point is that that document has had an extraordinary impact on many men throughout history who have ended up being notable, whether it’s in American politics or European politics.

 

So if you haven’t browsed that document, I recommend you do! You don’t have to believe it’s real. Go into it with an open mind. Read it for yourself and see what you think.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, read that and read the Talmud. [chuckling] You don’t have to read the Talmud! I just mean that when you take the two of them together, though, it’s like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know what the Talmud is? It’s a series of books, like 13 different volumes.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Wasn’t it written by rabbis? It’s much more recent than Bibles or anything like that.

 

[25:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Certain classes of jewish rabbis basically believe that they’re gods in human form almost, that they argue with God and win, and that they have the most extensive wisdom and big jewish brains that no goyim could ever dream of containing within their small goy skulls. And they basically just write down laws and rules for jews to follow in order to keep them a separate people and make them believe they’re the master race of the world. And that over the last couple of thousand years or so has kind of collected over the time and different rabbis have added to it. Some rabbis have challenged other rabbis and been killed for it.

 

So they’ve really fought to try to keep this pure version of jewish law, which isn’t really pure at all! It’s just like a collection of arguments and claims made by different respected rabbis who had the power and influence to make those claims in their respective times. And it’s put all into these volumes, which is like, there’s like 13 different volumes. And there’s a lot of stuff in there. It’s very specific stuff. But if you want it all summarized in something readable there’s a book called The Talmud Unmasked*.

 

I can’t remember who authored it, but I know it was translated, I think, by a Roman Catholic priest who ended up being executed by the Bolsheviks during, …

 

[* “The Talmud Unmasked” is an 1892 work by Justinas Pranaitus. Generally regarded as anti-Semitic, it is a collection of quotes from the Talmud and Zohar that the author claims illustrate that Judaism promotes hatred towards non-Jews to the point of promoting murder. Contents include: “Justinas Pranaitis”, “Jesus Christ in the Talmud”, “The Christians”, “Christians Must Be Avoided”, and “Christians Must Be Exterminated”. Justinas Bonaventura Pranaitis (1861 – 1917) was a Lithuanian Catholic priest who worked as Master of Theology and Professor of Hebrew at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Available as PDF download: https://archive.org/details/talimud-unmasked-by-prenaitis-the-justinas-bonaventura-pranaitis]

 

Graham Connolly: The jews hate when the goyim know about the Talmud.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re not supposed to, … Apparently communicating the secrets of the Talmud to the non-jews is akin to the murder of all jewish people. Because if the goyim knew what the jews taught about them, the goyim, then the goyim would just kill jews openly. That’s what they say in the Talmud!

 

So basically what that means is they’re desperate to keep their holy religious teachings secret.

 

But then there’s, … Look, it depends on who you believe, because some jews will tell you that the Talmud isn’t the most holy texts to Judaism, it’s the Torah.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s Talmudic Judaism and then there’s the more Orthodox Judaism, which is the Torah. But apparently that’s what they do to lie. Because apparently the Talmud is revered as the most holy text among all their different sects. However, it depends on who you believe.

 

Graham Connolly: It does. Yeah. Because you do have these Orthodox ones that even seem to be against Israel and stuff.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. But you get that in every community, you’re always going to get offshoots. Like, we have plenty of White people who hate White people and want them to basically cease to exist.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s true, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’re in government! [chuckling] So in every race, there’s people who don’t like their own race. But I think the norm for the jews, you know, 90, 98% of jews do believe that they’re a special and separate people and they want to remain that way. They’re a fascinating race, the jews.

 

Graham Connolly:

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: In fairness, you kind of almost have to take your hat off to them. Just done a good job at trying to achieve what they’re trying to achieve. Like, if you laid out a goal to literally eradicate their White race, like 100 years ago, it would have sounded like an impossible task. Like a fantasy! Like how could it possibly be achieved?

 

Blair Cottrell: A lot of the methods, if, …

 

Graham Connolly: Deception!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, a lot of the methods used by jewish intellectuals to deceive European or European extension nations today have been repurposed from what’s been observed by British colonials and the French Revolution and empire.

 

And so even though there’s always been jewish intellectuals living through, or not always, but living throughout European society, for the last couple of thousand years, they’ve been able to watch and learn a great deal from the warlike nature of the Europeans. Because we are a race that conducts war in a way that’s very effective. The Anglo specifically. We’re good at war. And the jews have been living in our societies watching us be good at war.

 

Graham Connolly: And so the most effective thing they’ve done, though, is make us war against each other.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes. If you want to put it down entirely to jewish influence. But there’s always. How should I describe “complicit individuals”?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Oh, yeah, absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: Who, like Churchill, for example.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who are playing a very dirty role. And I don’t know if it’s for their own gain. I don’t know whether they’re in on it from the beginning. I do know that Churchill was critical of the jewish people early on in his political career, but ended up. I don’t know. I know that people, for reasons of tribalism, like we’ve discussed, to some degree, they can be easily pitted against each other as a result of that tribalism.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I know that Churchill, at least at some point in his life, was an English patriot and he was worried about the expansion of the German empire. Right. He wasn’t pro-German at any point in his life.

 

Whereas the Prime Minister before Churchill, who was, … What was his name again?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I wouldn’t know. I’m, …

 

Blair Cottrell: He visited Germany and he was an admirer of Hitler. It was Chamberlain, I think.

 

Graham Connolly: He was admirer of Hitler?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he was. He visited Germany.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, I know that a lot of the English people at the time, like the version of history we get now that we think was always the case. Was not always the case. Apparently Hitler was pretty popular among the English people.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was Time magazine’s Man of the Year at one point. And this is before the war because he was considered a bit of a phenomenon before the war because he was able to turn Germany’s economic situation around.

 

[* Hitler as Man of the Year by TIME magazine, Jan. 2, 1939. From TIME magazine (https://time.com/5573720/hitler-world-influence/): “Hitler appeared on the cover of TIME on multiple occasions — most famously perhaps on Jan. 2, 1939, when he was named Man of the Year. That choice abided by the dictum of TIME founder Henry Luce, who decreed that the Man of the Year — now Person of the Year — was not an honor but instead should be a distinction applied to the newsmaker who most influenced world events for better or worse. In case that second criterion was lost on readers, the issue that named Hitler dispensed with the portrait treatment that cover subjects typically got. Instead he was depicted as a tiny figure with his back to the viewer, playing a massive organ with his murdered victims spinning on a St. Catherine’s wheel. Underneath the stark, black-and-white illustration was the caption, ‘From the unholy organist, a hymn of hate.’”]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

[30:58]

 

Blair Cottrell: Which wasn’t an easy thing to do at the time because Germany was in peril before, when Hitler came to power. And one of the reasons Hitler came to power was because Germany was in such peril.

 

Graham Connolly: The Weimar Republic.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And Hitler just actually beat the communists at their own game, because it seemed like the communists were capitalizing on Germany’s situation to try to take power at the time. But by observing how the communists were conducting themselves, Hitler basically repurposed their own methods, but for the cause of National Socialism. And he beat them at revolution. He did revolution better than the communists. But he learnt it from the communists at the same time.

 

But I think the communists were seen almost as a foreign force in Germany, maybe. And Hitler was a soldier. He was a proud German. He was a racialist. And the Germans at the time, especially with Hindenburg, who was considered a bit of an icon by Hitler. Hitler actually really respected Hindenburg. Hindenburg was a German ethnic nationalist, a racialist. I think that racialism really appealed to the Germans at the time, and they weren’t ready to accept communism for that reason. And that’s just evidence that having a strong ethnic consciousness, an understanding that you are an exclusive race and that is important, actually protects you against international subversive movements like communism. Which is another reason they probably want to destroy race. Right?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: What do you think? Do you think they can achieve it? Like, I mean, they’ve obviously made great inroads in the last hundred years, but what do you think about these movements like Tom’s, like ours that’s grown here in Australia, growing world-wide? How do you think it’s going to go, going forward? Do you think we’ll. Do you think we’ll see a sort of a rebirth of nationalism coming back? You know, history to say is cyclical? Do you think we’ll start to make inroads? Do you think we’ll start to take bites out of this big communist apple that we’re fucking fighting against?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s two immediate obstacles that I sense.

 

The first one is increased lawfare, so more police harassment being targeted with even worse accusations, that kind of thing. Basically trying to stay out of jail.

 

But the second, I don’t think anyone’s kind of safe from that either. You don’t necessarily have to be National Socialists, just have to be effectively critical of the government and feeding nationalism somehow.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, there’s a guy in Brisbane who’s not one of us at all who was charged for throwing Romans at the March for Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: There you go.

 

Graham Connolly: And he hasn’t been charged with the state laws. He’s been charged at the federal level.

 

Blair Cottrell: They want to put him in jail.

 

Graham Connolly: One year minimum.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: The judge has to put him in jail for one year minimum.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what they’re investigating me for. And they raided me on no evidence. They had no evidence! They just came up with the idea that I did it and they raided me. And I don’t know what they hoped to gain, but there’s that happening in the immediate future and that can take many ugly forms, because if they’re going to be raiding people on no evidence, that’s not much different from just inventing evidence to get you in the courts, to get you in jail, to screw with your reputation.

 

Then I sense that not too far away either is another crisis of some point of some sort.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That will be imposed by the international system.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think Covid will have been a warm up compared to what the next one will be.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I think you’re probably right. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think they will try another pandemic type situation, only this time it will be worse and there could actually be a virus which is worse. I do think they’re going to aim for a culling because there’s actually just too many people. There’s too many people to effectively manage at this point.

 

So the idea is to like just fill the Western nations with as many people as possible from around the world, create chaos, then impose this crisis. Use the crisis to significantly reduce the population and then impose a more totalitarian regime on the remaining people who survive. That seems to be the only mathematical way forward for the international system.

 

Graham Connolly: When you see the international system acting like they’re acting right now, do you also see an increase in the amount of people that are pushing back against it? Like as in people are starting to go, whoa, hold on now. So even people that were just completely blind to it, completely asleep to it all, completely just cognitive dissonance and all that sort of thing. Do you think that there’s a certain threshold where more and more people, even people you wouldn’t have normally expected, will start pushing back?

 

Blair Cottrell: Definitely!

 

The problem is when people are left to their own devices and to try to figure things out on their own, they go down their own rabbit holes. And in order for people to effectively revolt, they need a sort of a centralised movement to follow. Yeah, people don’t revolt on their own if there’s not an organised or pre-planned system they can follow.

 

Everyone just ends up in their own head and thinking they have all the answers.

 

[36:10]

 

Graham Connolly: And I’ve noticed this with a lot of people that get to the Truther movements and the anti-establishment movements and the conspiracy movements, a lot of people know instinctively that something is not right. They’re not being told the truth on most things.

 

But then a lot of people don’t have what I would call “discernment”. And it’s almost like a superpower in these movements to have discernment. It’s so important to be able to discern between the disinformation that’s been fed to people in order discredit you. Because it’s so easy to discredit yourself these days, if you represent any position that is wrong, like if you tell the world that Blair Cottrell is Shane Warne’s son, cuckg for example, you lose your credibility. [chuckling] Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, well, this is one of the reasons why United Patriots Front blew up in popularity, because there was already a lot of discontent in society surrounding immigration, specifically Islamic immigration, due to certain cultural factors and incidents.

 

But then I came along and said:

 

“Well, here’s our enemy. Here’s who we are for a start. We’re Australians, we’re patriots, and these people over there, they’re our enemy. Down with them! Let’s go!”

 

And so then everyone gets on board because someone comes along with a simple explanation that’s very hard to disagree with, …

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That no one can really disagree with. And everyone’s preconceived ideas of what the problem is, it all fits into the broad space that I’ve left by making such a simple explanation.

 

So everyone feels represented and so everyone begins to move in the same direction.

 

So what you want to do as a revolutionary or as someone who wants to create a populist movement or can even just contribute to it in a small way, you’ll know you’re making success when you’ve got you can spot conspiracy theorists, your truthers, your Nativists, and then your nationalists and then your National Socialists. All these different groups which only have loose connections but are all going in their own direction and arguing. When all of those groups start to move together in the same direction, following one man’s message, then you’ve got a movement!

 

[issue with the audio]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, we had a little sound problem there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But I think I was asking you if you see any similarities between the recent March for Australia on August 31 that we just had, and the UPF.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, March for Australia is much bigger. Much bigger! Much more sudden!

 

Graham Connolly: Because you were just talking about how bringing together all these different groups, the Nativists, the National Socialists, the truthers, conspiracy theorists, and it just made me think of that because it kind of felt like a little bit like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s happened organically, which is interesting. It means that people are experiencing pain, social, financial pain, and they’re associating that pain with immigration.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Now the government is trying to gaslight people into believing it’s not the source of their pain. It’s all of these mathematical economic factors that just need to be fixed by crunching some numbers.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it is immigration. And everyone knows it! And so that’s what’s driving this phenomena. So there’s opportunity there for anyone who wants it.

 

Graham Connolly: And no one can deny that almost every person at March for Australia was White!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

I mean, there were some people who weren’t, but it’s almost like the people at March for Australia who weren’t White, it’s like they’re kind of spiritually White or something. They have the same mindset, and they’re kind of connected to the movement, regardless.

 

That’s probably because, I don’t know, there were some weird people I saw in other states, you know, celebrating their multicultural. How should I put this? I’ll rephrase that. Celebrating their foreign brothers. Did you see the picture of that old guy with his arms around the black people looking up to the sky with a smile on his face?:

 

“I’m such a good person!”

 

You know, the other day I was at the gym and I noticed something. There’s always that guy at the gym who talks really loudly to the black guy, as almost like a way of signaling that he’s a good person because he’s talking to the black or his friends with the black guy.

 

Graham Connolly: He needs everybody to hear him. He’s talking louder than he would normally speak.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And he’s being, …

 

Graham Connolly: And he needs everybody around him to see him.

 

Blair Cottrell: That, and he’s being unnecessarily, unusually kind to the black guy, to the point where even the black guy is kind of like:

 

“What are you doing, bro?”

 

Graham Connolly: It’s really a feminine trait, I find.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And I think I’ve inspired it sometimes because I think some guys in the gym might know who I am.

 

And so someone feels it’s necessary to go over there and have a really loud, friendly conversation with the black guy, in spite of me or something, as though I care! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Do your thing there!

 

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, weird people at March for Australia. Some weird people. But overall, it was a cultural phenomenon which is very similar to UPF. Funnily enough, it’s happened almost exactly 10 years afterwards.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And then 10 years prior to that was the Cronulla riots, which would have happened before you arrived in Australia, when I was still a young fella.

 

So it’s like every 10 years there’s some sort of organic cultural response to the foreign presence in Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you have any thoughts on how we could keep it alive this time, not let it peter out and have to wait 10 more years for another? Sort of like how to capitalise on what’s just happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: Register a political party! Get everyone to support the political party.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

[41:46]

 

Blair Cottrell: Make it cool. Make it popular.

 

Graham Connolly: Like you were saying a few minutes ago, where it has to get be all these different groups coming together, but they have to be behind somebody. Like, they have to be led by, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Something legitimate, something tangible has to result. Something permanent has to come as a result of phenomena like this.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you’re just going to use it like I did with UPF to try to start this Facebook page which turns into a protest group, then it can kind of just be shut down.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like all they did was censor me from social media, take me to court on Trumped up charges, close my bank accounts and that’s it! Its done.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And for the government, that’s not that hard. And they also learnt that they can shut down future protest groups the same way.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Which they will.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, a lot of these March for Australia people are all just online personalities. Like they’re not, they don’t have any structure or any organisation. We are the only ones that actually have some organisation, some structure, some community like events that we put together. A political party that we’re putting together.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I just like some nuts. So they’re all in my teeth.

 

Graham Connolly: Oh, [chuckling] that’s all right. Yeah. So we do have that structure this time. Or at least we’re almost there. You know, we’ve got the numbers for the political party. Almost. I’m sure if we pushed hard for it, we could get them pretty much.

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think the March of Australia should be leveraged to get a political party registered.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because then there’s something tangible and permanent and official that has resulted from the phenomena. The problem you’re going to have though is the bureaucracy of the current government is basically set up to make sure you fail.

 

So they’re going to come up with reasons not to register your party, …

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: And you’re going to have to basically take them to court and you’re going to have to spend the time, money, labour in the courts, basically suing the hell out of them for discriminating against you. And that’s the mistake I made going into politics. I didn’t have any money when I started criticising the government. And it might sound superficial, but unfortunately, you can’t do anything without money.

 

So when the government closed my bank accounts, censored me, took me to court for hate speech, I couldn’t defend myself. I couldn’t sue the bank for closing my accounts. I couldn’t sue the government for discrimination. I couldn’t sue the social media companies to get me back up. And I couldn’t develop any sort of method because I had no money! Right. I needed a building of lawyers to sue the fuck out of everyone who was screwing with me!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: To push back and create a precedent to say:

 

“You can’t do this again!”

 

Instead, I was just a poor guy. I was just a carpenter from the suburbs with a phone.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And so I was easy to squash. If I could have my time again, I would get rich first. Because I’ve actually figured out recently that’s quite easy to make money in the current system, with social media and the kind of technology we have, it’s not hard to make good money if you’re really focused.

 

Graham Connolly: I was actually going to ask you about that the cost of being you. Like and being a truth teller.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, it’s cost me everything.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s cost me everything. But it’s forced me to learn how to make money through alternative. It’s forced me to be more entrepreneurial, you might say.

 

And so I’m using an online coaching service right now! I’m building an online coaching service, and already I’ve started making decent money through it. And I’m also providing a very valuable service to people that improves their lives as a result of it, too.

 

But I’m not going to plug that. I’m not here to plug that at the moment because it’s still in the works. It’s kind of operating behind the scenes. And it will be something that I’ll be plugging in the future once it’s completed and in full swing.

 

Graham Connolly: But your whole adult life has been you unfiltered, basically. No matter how much pressure to put on you stayed unfiltered. You stayed true. You stayed telling the truth! And you have suffered because of that.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all I know how to do, though.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And life is suffering. If you don’t suffer, you get weak.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to go through some threshold of suffering in order to stay strong and sharp.

 

Graham Connolly: You and Tom have known each other a long, long time. You had the UPF days, You had the Lad Soc days. What sort of thoughts went through your mind when you were watching Tom give his speech from the steps of Parliament?

 

Blair Cottrell: I was proud of him.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was impressed by how far he’s come, by how steadfast he’s remained in what he believes, no matter. No matter what! No matter what’s comes, he’s just held his head up high and he has refused to stop believing in the victory of Australian nationalism for a single moment. He hasn’t spent a single moment thinking, this isn’t going to work.

 

Graham Connolly: No, no.

 

Blair Cottrell: He is completely dedicated to the goal of victory.

 

[46:21]

 

Graham Connolly: I was in Brisbane that day, and when I seen the video start coming through of Tom with the podium. With the speakers on the steps of Parliament with that crowd there, it was a surreal moment. I was like fuck!

 

[See: Thomas Sewell’s Speech at the March for Australia Rally in Melbourne – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript]

 

Blair Cottrell: I was worried for him, I gotta be honest. I was thinking:

 

“Are the people ready for Tom Sewell? Are they gonna accept this?”

 

And I did give him some advice, prior, because he told me he was planning on giving a speech. And I said:

 

“Mate, I don’t know if it’s the right decision, to be honest.”

 

But he told me:

 

“I’m doing it. I don’t care!”

 

And I’m just like:

 

“Ahhh.”

 

And he said:

 

“No, I don’t care! I’m doing it!”

 

And I’m like:

 

“All right, do what you want.”

 

But I’m thinking:

 

“Fuck!”

 

I was so nervous seeing him walk up there, because I was thinking:

 

“Are people going to scream at him? Are they going to, …”

 

But then everyone cheered! Everyone loved it! And I was just like:

 

“Whoa, whoa. He did it!”

 

Graham Connolly: What a moment, man!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And it’s like I realised in that moment that I might have been wrong about everything. I might have been wrong about, as I already said, about National Socialism always being a demon to society. Maybe it won’t always be that way. And maybe things are already changing.

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe if the people that are representing that aren’t demons. Maybe if the people that are representing it are actually the ones fighting the demons! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. But that’s the thing. They’re going to take new measures to make us out as demons now.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely, they are!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And so that’s why we have to stick together, I guess. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Anyway, it’s been a good night.

 

Graham Connolly: I was just about to say that sounds like a really good spot to end it. Yeah, that was awesome!

 

Blair Cottrell: It was. It’s gone really quick. And it was a very conversational podcast.

 

Graham Connolly: It was. Yeah, look, I thought a lot about this. I was going home. Like, do I do this really structured thing? Like, I went back and forth with different ideas and how I should do it.

 

But really, it’s because I was talking to a few other people and we’re kind of putting ideas in my head and stuff like that. But really all I want to do with this is talk to people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s the truth! I don’t know if you’ve ever, … You know, I had the idea the Offaly Offensive 20 years ago, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You just sat on it?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I just sat on it. Because this is before I was National Socialist, but I was like since 9/11 kind of thing, and after that and stuff like that, because trying to wake up your own family and it didn’t seem to be working. I was like:

 

“Maybe there’s a way to do good work like this and get the word out there to more people and stuff like that.”

 

But I just never seemed right or whatever.

 

And I remember recently, I don’t know if you ever heard of a guy on YouTube called The Leather Apron Club.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I haven’t.

 

Graham Connolly: He does lots of videos, but he did one on Joe Rogan and he literally just data! He breaks down all. Every guest. Like, out of thousands of guests Joe Rogan has had on, actually, I think it’s thousands of episodes, but it works out to be about 900 guests because some of them are repeat guests. And not including MMA, not including, like action guys like mountain climbers, stuff like this, all the political guests, comedians and stuff like that, people who comment, who have basically an influence on how the world thinks 48% of them or 46% of them or something are jewish!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t know.

 

Graham Connolly: And he goes through all the data. He goes:

 

“Look, I’m not going to draw any conclusions. I’m gonna leave that to you guys. I’m just going to present the data.”

 

It’s called The Leather Apron Club. Really, really great video. Brilliant video.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what conclusion do you draw from that?

 

[See: Nobody knows that HALF of Joe Rogan’s Guests have THIS in common.]

 

Graham Connolly: Well, he’s [Joe Rogan] not really alt-media. Like, he’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Or maybe the people who are influential in society a lot of them are jewish.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re the people who you would bring onto a podcast.

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe. Maybe. Yes. But yes, true, true. But there are 2% of the population, 46% of the influential guests?

 

Blair Cottrell: Like there’s probably a similar threshold in the ruling class.

 

Graham Connolly: The guy actually draws a good comparison. He goes:

 

“You might not think much of that. But let’s do a comparison here. The Native American population are also 2% of the population. If 48% of the political guests of the Joe Rogan podcast were Native American, you would ask the question. You’ll be like, Jesus! Like, it seems like a lot of these guys are Native Americans.”

 

Blair Cottrell: You got to admit, though, like, jews are more interesting to listen to than Native Americans.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s it. They’re just like, they’re usually more influential, more powerful, more wealthy, or they’re at least interesting to listen to because they know how to turn a phrase. They’re mercantile people, the jews. And part of being mercantile is being able to speak well.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: To sell.

 

[50:49]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, true, true. But I still think there’s more to it than that.

 

And also then he does not just Joe Rogan, he does Russell Brand. He does all these top podcasters. All of them. And every one of them is the same story across the board.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And I remember when I seen that, and that’s a few years old now, but when I seen that, it was kind of like another inspiration to do it.

 

And part of the inspiration was to only have people on my podcast that Joe Rogan wouldn’t have on his.

 

Blair Cottrell: So the 2% of the population were Nazis. You’re going to interview all them? [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: I’m going to interview people that Joe Rogan would never interview!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, fair.

 

Graham Connolly: And I don’t think Joe Rogan would interview you, for example. He might because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’m not like, big enough, I don’t think.

 

Graham Connolly: No, but even if you, … I don’t know, man, but even if you were, I don’t think he won’t interview Tom. He’s not going to interview. Like, Tom could get as big as he wants. Maybe by the time Tom is that big, it would be more acceptable to interview him. But I can’t see it happening. Like, there’s a lot of well known nationalist people that he’d never have on.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, the truth is I know how to build a YouTube channel. I know how to make videos that’ll get a lot of views.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know how to do it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I could do it pretty much anytime I want to do it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And sometimes I do dabble in it a little bit. Sometimes I’ll make a little clip.

 

Graham Connolly: You’ve made some really good videos recently.

 

Blair Cottrell: But there’s something holding me back, and it’s the concern of where the culture’s at right now! And I feel like I’m just a sitting duck basically because I don’t have any money. So the idea is that before I build that platform and before I make the videos I want to make, I want to be able to protect myself legally.

 

Graham Connolly: The truth is, I think that was partly what was holding me back for ages as well. And I’ve done the same thing. I was like:

 

“I want to get myself financial freedom, this, that neuter and blah, blah, blah, blah.”

 

And I think eventually, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe it was excuses? For me it’s not an excuse though. Like for me, I’m genuinely focused on making money right now! Like that’s what’s taken up most of my consciousness.

 

Graham Connolly: About 10 years ago, I got to a point where for the first time in my life, I wasn’t what I would consider a broke person. I was like:

 

“I had money. I wasn’t worrying about bills.”

 

I got to that first stage of wealth is what they call. The first stage is where your bills come in and you just pay them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And I ain’t there anymore! [chuckling] Since Covid things have taken a downturn.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wasn’t it disappointing. Like I lost pretty much everything of the small amount of stuff I owned. I just like sold most of the stuff to keep surviving.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I worked for myself. I didn’t qualify for any sort of like jobkeeper that everyone else was getting. I didn’t take anything from the government during Covid I just sold stuff. Then I started a personal training business because I was thinking to myself:

 

“Well, everyone’s sitting at home getting fat. So everyone’s allowed out an hour a day. I’ll offer people 45 minute training sessions. We’ll go out into parks and do group sessions. I’ll make some money that way. Everyone’s being paid money by the government to sit at home and do nothing and get fat.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’ll offer them something where I can make some of that money for myself and in return give them something to do.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s how I started my personal training business.

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: And so that’s how I built my first clientele. But I’m glad it happened in a way because it got me away from construction. Even though my family’s pretty big into construction, it was never that interesting to me. I was always more interested in people and working with people.

 

Graham Connolly: It seems like a natural draw for you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: All right, Blair, well, thanks many for coming in.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good on you, mate. Well, thanks for inviting me. It’s a wonderful setup you’ve got here. Really impressive that you’re getting it started and I hope it goes well for you.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, thank you very much. Thank you very much. Any idea who I should have on next time?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve had a think and I think maybe Matt Trihey. He might be a good one.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep, he might be great to have on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Matt Trihey is an influential guy in the March for Australia movement.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: He definitely has some sway there.

 

Graham Connolly: He’s interesting as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: He is. And I’d love to see. I don’t know if you’ll do it, but I’d love to see the Damien Richardson. I’d love to see him jump on and hear his side of the story.

 

Graham Connolly: I love to interview Damian Richardson.

 

[54:51]

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s got that Nazi salute charge going on and I haven’t heard his side of the story. I know why he was charged and what it was for. And it was really unfair.

 

Graham Connolly: Really unfair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Bullshit!

 

Graham Connolly: Unbelievable, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: And he needs some support.

 

Graham Connolly: He does.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think the lawyers are going to tell him:

 

“No, no, no, don’t talk about it!”

 

But it’s after the fact, so it doesn’t matter what you’re saying.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I think he’s been keeping his head down for that reason probably too. And I feel bad for the guy, man! It’s fucking, …

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s a good bloke.

 

Graham Connolly: He’s a really good bloke, man! Yeah, just a down to earth, honest. Honest to God. True blue Aussie. A good bloke. Yeah, I’d love to have him on. I might try and contact him and see if he do it.

 

But look, if he wouldn’t, maybe he do it in the future. But he’s definitely one I’d love to have on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Once he gets going he’s the kind of guy who’s, this is my opinion. He’s the kind of bloke, he’s like:

 

“Oh, you know, …”

 

But then once he gets going there’s a fire in him! There’s a passion and he just goes crazy! He just goes off! And that’s what I love to see. I want to bring that out of him more. So yeah, we’ll see.

 

Graham Connolly: Awesome! Awesome!

 

All right, man! Thanks a million! Thanks for coming in.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good on you, Graham.

 

Graham Connolly: Cheers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Cheers mate!

 

[55:52]

 

[Outro video]

 

[56:12]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/25/2025 = 25)

katana17
just now
[The Offaly Offensive – Blair Cottrell – Part 1 – Oct 12, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/10/19/the-offaly-offensive-blair-cottrell-part-1-oct-12-2025-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell joins Graham Conolly on his The Offaly Offensive channel for an in-depth discussion about the cost of right wing activism in Australia. Items discussed include:
1. The host introduces Blair Cottrell as “one of the most notorious and scrutinised figures in Australian activism” for a discussion about his decade in public activism.
2. The conversation begins with confusion over Blair being mistakenly identified as “Shane Warne’s son” during Covid-19 discussions about vaccine theories.
3. Graham reveals he recently had his first child, born at home without midwives: “We had her here in this very living room. Just me and Katie. No midwives even.”
4. They discuss unvaccinated children, with Blair noting: “I have noticed that the kids that don’t get vaccinated and so forth, they don’t seem to have many problems.”
5. Graham explains his background: “I grew up in Ireland. Moved here when I was like 23”, and describes his Catholic upbringing.
6. He describes sectarian divisions in Ireland as cultural rather than serious: “It was light hearted… You still snipe at each other… It’s a tribal thing.”
7. Graham discusses getting a dog during Covid and the responsibility it entailed: “When the novelty wears off a dog, that’s when you find out who you are.”
8. They explore the unnaturalness of suburban life for both humans and dogs, with Graham noting dogs on medication for anxiety in Western suburbs.
9. Blair traces his awareness of pharmaceutical manipulation back to 2008, observing depression advertising: “Are you feeling down today? It could be depression. Call this number… Trying to convince everyone they were depressed.”
And more, …

Delete
Snow_Whitee
14 hours ago
I think the Offaley offensive is a great name too by the way and love the intro to this podcast!!
1 like

Snow_Whitee
14 hours ago
I unfortunately still feel like that most people wouldn’t be able to accept Nazism as anything but evil. I think the black bloc is really effective though. In my opinion those boys look exceptional, gives a vibe of strength, discipline and organisation. Solid
1 like

TTFOLEY1914
3 days ago
Most interesting convo heard in years
1 like

JillKews8841
4 days ago
Fantastic content, thanks to both of you.
1 like

Gailmaree
4 days ago
It was a pleasure meeting you on Sunday and look forward to your next interview
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
3 days ago
Lovely meeting you too. And your little puppy.
0 likes

ThomasB1986
5 days ago
Great interview. The mic volume was much better this time. Can’t wait for the next one.
1 like

TheQueensGuard
Supporter
5 days ago
30:26 why does blair pronounce it chamber “lane”
1 like

Anaximander1488
Verified
5 days ago
it’s great to listen to Blair, always filled intellectual curiosity
1 like

Jenny3819
Supporter
6 days ago
Another great show guys!!! Thanks for properly entertaining me. I do appreciate it.
2 likes

StonePony88
Supporter
6 days ago
Pretty good so far. Thanks.
2 likes

Angelalee0
6 days ago
What great chat. Blair is just a wealth of knowledge, could listen all day. Blair starting the ball rolling 10 years ago and Tom has taken the ball and ran with it. I hope NSN takes off and continues to gain traction. Australia needs it.
3 likes

somethingforthisbox
1 week ago
Forgery, like a painting as close to an exact copy of the original
2 likes

Dimma1313
Supporter
1 week ago
Hey my man! Fine tuning the flow as you go! Loved it. Could have listened to 3 hours of this! Great work buddy!
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 week ago
Thank you brother. I appreciate that very much.
1 like

mrwordsworth
1 week ago
this was the coziest chat with some of my favorite racists. thanks fellas
10 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
CountFrogDeFroggyFrog9000
1 week ago
Fake Punch? https://youtu.be/gYQXawHJLCg?si=Pg_hZUr1-vp54tmT
0 likes

MonThirteen
1 week ago
I have a huge problem with this discussion….. it just didn’t go long enough. I could have listened for hours and hours. Can’t wait to see who your next guest will be.
16 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
GigaChud7
1 week ago
I hope Rob Rundo
2 likes

SirChrisWilson
5 days ago
Exactly. I was just settling down into the “groove” of the conversation. Oh well, I have some new stuff for the reading list
1 like

Gailmaree
6 days ago
I would Matt to be interviewed.
0 likes

KINGMAGNUSMUISC
1 week ago
HEIL GRAHAM
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KINGMAGNUSMUISC
1 week ago
Punchin’ darts with Jimbo and Graham at the Pig n Whistle watching the vid of Tom’s speech at parliament was a night to remember!
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 week ago
Wasn’t it just brother. Magic. Thanks for watching. Looking forward to catching up again soon.
0 likes

wilson75590
1 week ago
I recently watched two of your videos and really enjoyed them great job! If you’d like to grow your channel, increase views
, and attract sponsorships, I can help using my experience on Rumble; I’m a bit busy with office work now, but please share your channel link via my email (wilsonchris4632@gmail.com) or Telegram (https://t.me/Wilson1336) so I can review it and guide you on what to improve.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer: Good evening. It is Saturday, the 20th of July in the year 2024, and you are tuned into the Republic Broadcasting Network. I am your host, Monika Schaefer, and this is episode four of The Flipside with Monika. I’d like to encourage you, first of all, if you have the means, to support RBN. It does cost money to run a network such as this and they are doing a summer fundraiser in which you can get something in return for your donation. Well, you always get something in return. That is a wonderful free speech network!

 

But more specifically, they do have some special T-shirts to give away. You can find the information how to donate like the telephone number on their website, Republicbroadcasting.org. Before I introduce today’s guest, and I am hoping he does show up, I just talked to him less than 2 hours ago, but I think we’re having a hard time reaching him right now.

 

But anyway, before I do that, I have some other things to say. So I’d like to give a shout out to a patriot whose online persona is Katana. He has a website, katana17.com. And I’ve been acquainted with Katana since just days after I made my video in 2016. That was that fateful video called Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust. And the reason I got acquainted with him then is because he transcribed it right away, and he put that transcription onto his website with memes and images. It was really nice. I was quite surprised, actually, that that showed up.

 

So then I was introduced to his work. And what he does is he transcribes a lot of videos and interviews, which he thinks are important to preserve in this other format, the written format or the printed word. There are many advantages to having things in a written form, and he had a section back then – I’m sure he still does on his website – that explained the many different advantages to having things like videos and interviews in the written form.* I mean, you could print it off and read it. It does give it some degree of permanency. Some people prefer to read things rather than listen to an interview. There’s all kinds of reasons.

 

 

Anyway, then, over the years, since 2016, I have received a tremendous amount of support and encouragement and assistance from Katana.

 

In fact, his encouragement for me to write a book was absolutely critical! And I don’t think I ever would have written that book that I wrote without Katana’s encouragement. And the book that has the same title as my fateful video, the Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust. The video was just six minutes long the book is a little bit longer than that! [chuckling]

 

 

Anyway, so I just want to say thank you, Katana. Oh, and of course, and the reason I wanted to do this shout out now, I’m very grateful to him for also having transcribed the first three episodes of this show, The Flipside with Monika.

 

So thank you to Katana!

 

Okay, now I would like to introduce my guest. I’m wondering if he’s had any luck getting on or., …

 

Oscar: I’m on now.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, good.

 

Okay, so I’d like to introduce my guest, who was one of the founding members of the Truth and Justice for Germans Society back in 2014. And his online persona is Oscar.

 

Now, through the years, I have learned so much from this man. Every time we had conversations together, he shared his insights with me, not only on historical events, but about race relations, about democracy, and even about nutrition.

 

So I think we might connect some of the dots on these seemingly disparate topics tonight.

 

But first, let me welcome Oscar onto the broadcast and ask you if you could please tell us, just give us a little bit of background. What led you and what motivated you to become a founding member of the Truth and Justice for Germans Society? Which, by the way, just before you do that, I just wanted to mention that I am involved in that society. So is of great interest to me. And the title of that society does say it all, really, what it’s about. I mean, obviously there’s lots to it, but the Truth and Justice for Germans Society. Okay. Welcome Oscar onto the show.

 

Oscar: Hi, Monika. Can you hear me okay?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, I can. Thank you.

 

Oscar: Okay. Yeah. Thanks for having me on. So I joined the Truth and Justice for Germans Society, I believe it was 2014. The society was started by a German fellow who had been, … This was kind of like a project he’d been working on for a long time. He put a lot of information together in a website, and then he wanted to create, like, an organization, a society to go along with the website. So he approached myself and a couple other people, a couple of friends, and asked us to help them set up this society. So that’s sort of how it started.

 

Now, myself and the two other people that he approached to help set it up, I mean, we all knew each other. We were sort of, I guess, at that point called “conspiracy theorists” because we were discussing, and 9/11 and all sorts of other things, and the direction society is going in. And, of course, you know, World War Two plays a big part in that. So that’s sort of how it initially got started.

 

[08:15]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. And obviously, if you were friends with him and he asked you to help with the founding of the Truth and Justice for Germans Society, it means that you had opened your eyes to what is going on in the world.

 

And you mentioned the word “conspiracy theorists”. Yeah, that’s a great term that was foisted on us, I think probably back in, after the Kennedy [JFK] assassination, because they noticed that too many people were noticing that something was wrong with their assessment of things. So they turned that term into such a derogatory term. And it’s been used ever since to make fun of or belittle people who are actually seeing, noticing patterns.

 

But, yeah, go ahead.

 

Oscar: It’s just to discredit people who are interested in finding out the truth and what’s really going on.

 

And also researching and discovering that most of what we’ve been told about history is a lie! You know, most of everything we’re told in society is a lie! You know, whether its history, nutrition, immigration, “Holocaust”, everything!

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: It’s all a big lie!

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s why I thought we might connect some of those dots today. Because even if it sounds like those topics that I mentioned, that I have personally learned a lot of things from you, and that was including nutrition, sounds like that doesn’t really have that much to do with the other topics like history, Holocaust, race relations. What does nutrition have to do with that?

 

But then, …

 

Oscar: Well, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Go ahead, please.

 

Oscar: Nutrition has a lot to do with it because really, I mean, what our enemy is doing is weakening us! And they poison our food, and then they give us an upside down food pyramid. When you’re not eating a nutritionally sound diet you’re going to be weaker physically and mentally. So it’s part of the overall war against White people.

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: Nutrition factors in very, very much. I mean you have the vegan and vegetarian cults which ensnares, like, most young women, and this creates more health problems. It makes it harder for them to conceive. So it’s also an attack on White fertility.

 

Monika Schaefer: I agree.

 

And you mentioned against the White race in particular. Do you think that the nutritional attack or the assault on us through false information about nutrition, do you think that is specifically aimed at European people, at White people?

 

Oscar: Completely! Because pretty much every young White female girl is ensnared in the vegetarian-vegan cult. They get them young and they get them in this cult, and it creates nothing but health problems. And like, I said, it’s going to make it very difficult for these people to conceive children.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I mean, I would agree with you. And they, I think they can do it through taking advantage of the empathy, we love nature, we love animals. Isn’t that part of it?

 

Oscar: Yeah. Yes, very much so! The whole thing about the cruelty to animals and, it’s like the vegans are all about:

 

“Oh, you know, we’re against the killing and torture of animals!”

 

And meanwhile, that person has like a nice watch with a leather strap and leather jacket. And I mean, there’s a lot of hypocrisy that goes along with this whole agenda as well. But, at the end of the day, it is what it is. And it’s just one of the many weapons of used to attack the White race.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I agree. You know, the other day we were talking on the phone in anticipation of this, and we were talking about diseases in the past, and specifically we talked about the plague.

 

And I think that many of us have reached different conclusions now about that. Do you want to talk a little bit about that?

 

Oscar: Well, again, I mean, we were told that the plague was this highly contagious disease that was spread from human to human.

 

And I think certainly the Covid scam has opened a lot of people’s eyes to the fact that viruses are not real and like, human contagion is not a thing. You know, the concept that humans pass disease to one another. I mean, if that was true, we would have gone extinct a long time ago.

 

So this brings you back to the other theory of poisoning of the wells, which now seems to have a little more legitimacy once we start realizing that it wasn’t a contagious outbreak spreading from human to human, it was something else.

 

I mean, there is some documented evidence of people being caught poisoning wells, and tried and executed. But the six o’clock news is not going to talk about stuff like that.

 

Monika Schaefer: No, and neither are they going to teach that to the children in school what the real causes of the plague were. And they probably won’t mention the (((tribe))) that, who were these well poisoners. These are things that were not taught in the mainstream sources nor in our public education system!

 

And interesting. I’m glad you brought the, made the connection between then and now. This Covid, the bio-weapon, which they coerced through very strong measures. Like people were fired, people were not allowed into places, young people were not allowed into universities, or institutions like that, if they didn’t roll up their sleeve and get that bio-weapon. Oh, excuse me, they called it the “vaccine”. But even now it’s like that has disappeared from the news cycle because they’ve got other things to distract the public from.

 

Like, for example, Trump’s ear supposedly being shot and everybody’s talking about that now. And this other huge matter which is affecting millions of people who are either dying or are severely injured, that’s just gone away. It’s like it’s being forgotten. Or is it being forgotten? Do you want to comment about that? And bring then to now?

 

[16:57]

 

Oscar: The mainstream news is not going to ever address the number of vaccine injuries or the number of people who’ve died from the vaccine. They’re just going to ignore it. The only place you’ll get any news about that or information is on the alternate media.

 

And like you said, they’re just going to move on to their next pandemic or their next crisis or whatever, like the supposed assassination of Donald Trump. I mean, all these events are very fishy.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, yeah, that’s definitely an understatement. I would say! [chuckling] It’s a piece of theater. And even at that, even if it was real, we’re talking about a governance system, which we touched on this in our pre-show conversation the other day, too, about democracy.

 

And I hope we’re not jumping topics here too much, but I do think this is all related, and we can tie this all together then. But this governance system that I was taught in school:

 

“Oh, it’s government for the people, of the people, by the people!”

 

And this was hammered into our brains! And we just thought it was so great because they always told us it was the best system, really the only system. Like, it was so solidly implanted into our psyche that really we could just think:

 

“Well, how can it be any other way? Of course this is the best system.”

 

But what do you think about that, Oscar? Should we even be paying attention to voting and democracy? And is this working for us? Do you think this is really working for us? [chuckling] Go ahead.

 

Oscar: Well, no, it doesn’t work. Your vote doesn’t matter, really. I mean, democracy is just a, just a warm up round for full on communism. You know, we certainly saw that with the Covid pandemic. We all had this notion that we live in a democracy, and you wake up the next day and you’re not allowed to leave your house, and if you don’t take an injection, you’re going to lose your job. It’s like, how did that happen overnight? That’s, well, so much for our democracy!

 

Monika Schaefer: Actually, I find that a really interesting statement to say that democracy is actually a stepping stone to communism. To me, that’s a new idea. It’s really, really good, actually. We should expand on that a little bit more. We should explore that a little bit more. How does that happen? You’re right. Like, going from, … yeah, go ahead.

 

Oscar: Well, your vote doesn’t matter. I mean, let’s say you run a business and you have a family, you own a house. You have a vested interest in the state of the economy. You have a vested interest in the health of your country s But when you go vote and then let’s say this 20 year old girl with pink hair and she’s a transgender lesbian. Well, your vote carries the same weight as her vote. She has no stake in the economy. You know, she just wants to tear everything down!

 

So that’s another problem.

 

Monika Schaefer: I guess that is a communist idea, isn’t it? That everybody is equal, so everybody has a vote! No matter what position you have in life. That right there is, …

 

Oscar: Well, again, I mean, this notion of “everybody and everything is equal”, that’s a communist ideal, because nothing is further from the truth!

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: People that have no vested interest in the economy, the state of the nation, whatever, their vote carries the same weight as people that have a very definite vested interest in the economy and the nation. So this is a problem.

 

And Western countries are all multicultural now, and different cultures have different values, different outlooks on life and they’re going to vote for the party that’s soft on immigration so they can bring all their relatives into the country. Democracy doesn’t work. It creates, like, a mob rule.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. No, this is a very profound idea, I have to say. I mean, I was so into the whole “democracy thing” all my life, and then I even ran as a candidate, and please don’t hold it against me, but I ran in that Green Party, which I now understand to be “watermelon party”, which is really the worst of them all!

 

And what I mean by “watermelon”, it’s green on the outside and red on the inside. It is really a communist party!

 

But now we’re talking about the whole idea of democracy is communist, but the Green party legitimizes it. Go ahead.

 

Oscar: The hidden agenda of the Green Party, and like because about the same time, Green parties appeared in pretty much every Western country. But the Green party was used as a vehicle to start introducing all these crazy “green initiatives”. And then over time, all these ideas eventually became adopted by the mainstream parties. But they used the Green party to float these ideas out into the public sphere. And then over time, the mainstream parties just eventually adopted all these policies.

 

Monika Schaefer: Bingo! You nailed it! Because this is the idea that’s been percolating in my head, too. This very idea that the Green Party actually sets the agenda, even though they are still, and they have been very much just on the fringe. Took them a long time before they even got a single seat. Then they got a few seats, and yet they are setting the agenda, all the way!

 

In fact, I’ll just tell you a little quote from Elizabeth May. And I used to think it was so noble! Elizabeth May, the leader of the Green Party of Canada back then, when she said this, and now still she says:

 

“I will always.”

 

Sorry. No, this is a different quote. She said:

 

“I don’t care if they steal our ideas, as long as they implement them! I don’t care if they don’t give us credit for their ideas. I just care that they use our ideas and put them into practice, like implement them.”

 

So I thought that was really noble because I thought:

 

“Wow, she’s so modest. She doesn’t need to take the credit.”

 

And yet what I see is that she was basically encapsulating exactly what happens, is that the Green party sets the agenda. They bring forth the ideas, and then the main parties, the big parties, the “gray parties”, as the Greens used to call them, they implement them. Isn’t that interesting?

 

Oscar: Yeah, well, once they’ve, you know, been floating around in, out there on the media for X number of years, people get used to hearing this and then over time they just become more acceptable to these ideas. When you look at these green policies they’re trying to implement, like this Green New deal right now. I mean, really it just ties into Agenda 2030.

 

So it’s not about going green. It’s about going without!

 

Monika Schaefer: Indeed.

 

Oscar: You know, we have an abundance of energy and resources. But those who pull the strings, want everyone to be equally poor. And that includes being energy poor.

 

[26:53]

 

Monika Schaefer: Through a big, big fat lie about carbon and carbon dioxide. I mean, that like, … Go ahead. Sorry.

 

Oscar: That’s the biggest lie of them all, is the CO2 is going to destroy the atmosphere and kill us all!

 

Monika Schaefer: And yet CO2 is the stuff of life! [chuckling]

 

Oscar: Like the pre-industrial CO2 levels of 280 parts per million. I mean, that was dangerous. Dangerously low!

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: That’s approaching extinction level.

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: So now it’s up to, like, around 400, or more. But the result of that is the earth is getting greener and agricultural yields have improved. And when plants get more CO2, they can survive with less water. So it’s an all around better situation if there’s a bit more CO2 in the atmosphere.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I think it’s interesting that you say:

 

“That’s the biggest lie of all.”

 

Because I think you’re right. And it took me longer to dissect that lie or to come to terms with it than the Holocaust lie, even though the Holocaust has been drummed into us since we were born, basically. And the Holocaust lie is punishable if you question that one.

 

Whereas if you questioned their narrative on climate change, so far anyway, you don’t go to jail for it. Although they start inserting words like:

 

“Oh, climate denier!”

 

And we know that that weaponized term has its power from the “Holocaust denier” term. So who knows in future what all they will deem us criminal for disagreeing with their narrative on.

 

But, yeah, that one is a huge lie because they are using that narrative of climate change and that we are burning up and we are responsible for ruining the planet. They are using that for their 2030 agenda or whatever all these other agendas are called.

 

And I think we are going to a break now, but we will be right back.

 

[29:21]

 

[music]

 

[29:44]

 

[ad]

 

[36:10]

 

[music]

 

[37:00]

 

All right, I would like to welcome you back to The Flipside with Monika. And I would like to also invite you, if you would like to call in, the number is 512-248-8252. And there’s also a 1800 number if you can’t call on that number, it’s 1800 313 9443.

 

But first, I’d like to just make some more observations with my guest, Oscar. And you probably know what song that was on the bumper music after the ads, before and after the ads there. And the fact that there are many German people who have been so brought down to their knees that they flinch when they hear that music because they have been made to feel badly about their national anthem. Do you want to comment on that, Oscar?

 

Oscar: Well, I guess that’s all part and parcel of the, … After World War Two, they instituted the so-called de-Nazification program. You know, pretty much every school book, every book published between 1933 and 1945 was destroyed by the Allies. They were the real book burners of history!

 

So that was part of the de-Nazification process. I mean, everything about National Socialism had to be destroyed, because it was the most effective form of governance that the modern world has seen! It wasn’t just the economic miracle. It was also a cultural and spiritual revolution as well. And if it wasn’t squashed with World War Two, it would have spread to most of the Western world.

 

So this is one of the main reasons for World War Two, what Hitler and what the Germans were doing. It was showing everyone that there’s a better way! You know, it was really a struggle of European nationalism versus jewish globalism.

 

And unfortunately, the end result, the bad guys won and the good guys lost. I’m referring to the Germans. They were the good guys in World War Two!

 

Monika Schaefer: Indeed, indeed! Everything been turned on its head, hasn’t it?

 

Oscar: Yeah, I like to quote what Goebbels said once. He said:

 

“If we are to lose this war, the world will fall into a state of eternal darkness.”

 

And, well, right now things look pretty dark in the Western world! [chuckling] You know, we’re being massively overrun with third world immigrants. Our economies are being trashed. We just went through this whole Covid scam where they injected 80% of the population with some mysterious poison.

 

Now they’re throwing this climate change green agenda at us. And there’s the digital currency looming on the horizon somewhere.

 

So, yeah, I mean, this is everything that Hitler and the Germans were fighting against. This is exactly what they were fighting against!

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly! Yeah. It makes me weep to know that, to learn that! And then to have Hitler be so demonized! I’m telling you, it took a long time, even after I learned the truth about World War Two and that the Holocaust didn’t happen. And actually, everything was kind of backwards and reversed in terms of what they told us. Even then, it took a while before I could decontaminate myself from those lies about Hitler. Because even though I then understood that he was a good guy, not this devil incarnate, I would still flinch when I saw him portrayed in a positive light.

 

I have, in the meantime, been very successful at decontaminating myself from that mind poison, so I do not flinch any longer! And I really think he was one of the greatest men that ever lived!

 

And I will just say the jews, they head up making the curriculum, and they own the media, the mass media, and they have poisoned us with their lies and deceptions about Hitler. And I guess it’s because of that fantastic way of governing, the National Socialist way, and what you just described that was really, really great.

 

And I think you could expand on that. It was spiritual in addition to their attitude towards the environment, everything about it was so good! Like you say, it would have spread to many more countries. Go ahead.

 

Oscar: It definitely would have, especially when they can see that Hitler circumvented the international bankers, that the German economy was thriving. And other countries could have easily followed that same program and achieved similar levels of success. Because Germany was thriving in the middle of The [Great] Depression.

 

Monika Schaefer: Exactly!

 

Oscar: The United States and England were mired deep in the recession, mass unemployment, poverty, misery. And by 1935, the German economy was booming. The standard of living was rising dramatically. People were happy. People were optimistic about the future. So yeah, I mean this why, …

 

Monika Schaefer: And brought., … Go ahead, finish your thought there.

 

Oscar: Oh, yeah. I sort of lost it!

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, no problem. He brought the Germans out of a state of poverty and suffering. Like after World War One, there was hunger in Germany. I know that from firsthand. Well, actually, I guess I should call it secondhand, it’s from my parents. Does one call that firsthand or secondhand?

 

Anyway, my parents, they lived that poverty after World War One. My dad was born in 1919. And, I mean, his mom took him to the doctor at age four because he was bow-legged*. So malnourished and he hadn’t started talking yet, and she was concerned about him. The doctor said:

 

“No, don’t worry, he’s fine.”

 

[* Rickets is a condition that results in weak or soft bones in children, and is caused by either dietary deficiency (Vitamin D) or genetic causes. Symptoms include bowed legs, stunted growth, bone pain, large forehead, and trouble sleeping.]

 

But that was the poverty that he was born into. And my mother, well, she was born a little bit later, 1928. But Germany after World War One was so poor that so many suicides took place. All kinds of things like that.

 

And then after Hitler came to power in 1933, things really, really changed!

 

And like you said, the middle of [The Great] Depression in the rest of the world, and Germany was doing very well, and leaders from various countries went to Germany to see:

 

“How did they do that here?”

 

And to see how he was doing that economic miracle.

 

So, yeah. Did you want to just comment? And then after that we could take a caller.

 

Oscar: Yeah, well, it’s actually not a complicated formula. He freed his people from the clutches of the jewish banking cartels. And of course, he also got rid of all the jewish sponsored degeneracy that was going on in Germany in the late twenties and early thirties, the Weimar Republic, I mean, so, …

 

Monika Schaefer: So, yeah, I like what you say. It was not a complicated formula! [chuckling] Get rid of jewish influence, jewish power! That is not complicated formula. Yeah.

 

Oscar: You have to get rid of the jewish money power and the jewish influence over your society. And I mean you just look at the United States today. Well, that’s like Weimar 2.0.

 

Monika Schaefer: It certainly is. And here in Canada, too.

 

Oscar: Yeah, but I mean, I’m not sure there’s a Hitler in the waiting to get us out of this mess!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah!

 

Oscar: I think this time every individual’s gotta see their own way out of it. And hopefully enough will do that it’ll create a big enough movement and change in society.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, that’s right. Everybody needs to act. And if you’re looking for leadership, just look in the mirror, and don’t wait for somebody else to do something. I think we’re at that stage. You’re absolutely right!

 

Oscar: Donald Trump, unfortunately not the savior of the White race.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s right. I agree 100% with you.

 

Oscar: Anyone who’s put their hand on the Wailing Wall* is not someone you can trust.

 

[* The Wailing Wall, also referred to as the Kotel, the Western Wall, or Solomon’s Wall, and whose lower sections date to about the first century BCE, is located in the Old Quarter of East Jerusalem in Israel/Palestine. Built of thick, corroded limestone, it is about 60 feet (20 meters) high and close to 160 feet (50 meters) long, though most of it is engulfed in other structures. A Sacred Jewish Site: The wall is believed by devout jews to be the Western Wall of the Second Temple of Jerusalem (destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE), the only surviving structure of the Herodian Temple built during the realm of Herod Agrippa (37 BCE–4 CE) in the first century BCE. The temple’s original location is in dispute, leading some Arabs to dispute the claim that the wall belongs to the temple, arguing instead that it is part of the structure of Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount.]

 

Monika Schaefer: I agree with you. Well, let’s take a caller, Bradley in Texas.

 

Oscar: Okay.

 

Monika Schaefer: Can you, …

 

Bradley: Hello. Great to speak with you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, welcome to the show. So do you have a question, or a comment?

 

Bradley: A comment, I guess. It’s just very enlightening to hear, very refreshing enlightening people talk about the history that we’ve been denied. [chuckling] You know, the big book burning that happened in Germany, though they didn’t show you the books, they were perversion books. Kind of like what’s going on now with what they’re pushing LGBTQ, all this crap!

 

[49:41]

 

Oscar: Yes, that’s correct. Yeah.

 

Bradley: Yeah. And I’m very aware of the Holohoax. You know, it was garbage too. And so few people are aware of these things. Most of the stations I listen to are limited hangouts. I met John Stadmiller back around, 2000, under Lisa Beeth and her husband, Bill Beeth. We’re at a conference with Ron Paul. Really interesting to meet him, and I love his network.

 

And so I thought I’d tune in, listen to what show he has playing. And lo and behold, some really enlightened people. It’s really refreshing. I enjoy your talk.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, thank you so much! And did you have a question for our guest?

 

Bradley: I can’t think of one, really. [chuckling]

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. Well, it’s really, really nice. It’s very refreshing to have your call. Thank you so much!

 

Bradley: Okay, thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay.

 

Bradley: Bye bye.

 

Monika Schaefer: So, Oscar, is there anything in particular you want to lead the conversation into, or carry on with?

 

Oscar: Well, I’ll just touch on the Holocaust for a minute.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, very appropriate. Because I do see that as the linchpin lie, underlying jewish power. That’s how I see it. Anyway, do, …

 

Oscar: But, yes, I mean, that’s correct. I mean, in a way, they very much predicated their future on the Holocaust lie. And that’s probably one of the reasons they so fiercely protect the Holocaust lie. I mean, pretty much every Western country now has laws against denying the Holocaust. I mean, even in Russia, it’s against the law to deny the Holocaust.

 

But there’s a very simple formula I use, and this applies to any agenda!

 

So when you have any agenda that requires censorship, you know it’s a lie! Whether it’s the Holocaust, Covid, 9/11, whatever! If it requires censorship, it’s guaranteed to be a lie! The truth never requires censorship!

 

Monika Schaefer: I agree. I agree 100%! The truth does not fear investigation and it does not fear debate about it. Yeah, that’s absolutely true!

 

And I would say that the Holocaust epitomizes the jewish narrative of always being the persecuted people and that everybody’s out to get them. And the Holocaust is the modern day, like, it epitomizes that narrative that goes back a long ways! I think they’ve been crying the blues about being the persecuted people for a long time! But now, Holocaust is the modern episode of that.

 

And why are they making all these laws in all our countries? It’s because if that, it’s not a matter of if, it’s when, because it’s already happening big time. The Holocaust lie, when that falls and really falls, their whole house of cards tumbles down!

 

This is what I think. Because boy, oh, boy, I think the Holocaust lie underpins everything! I mean, when we object to immigration, they shout:

 

“Oh, racist! That’s Holocaust is gonna happen! Another holocaust is gonna happen [chuckling] because you’re racist!”

 

I mean, that’s just one example, but it underpins their power, let alone all the money they’ve extorted for it.

 

We have another caller, Ed, in Iowa. Would, would you like to bring in Ed?

 

Oscar: Sure.

 

Monika Schaefer: Mr producer. Do we have? Okay, Ed.

 

Ed: Hello?

 

Monika Schaefer: Hello. Welcome to the show.

 

Ed: Okay. I wasn’t sure. I didn’t know I was on.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, go ahead. Do you have a question, or a comment?

 

Ed: I have a comment. And it’s a extremely important for everybody to listen to this. What do you think is the biggest lie that we’ve been told to keep us in check? What do you think it is?

 

Monika Schaefer: Go ahead, Oscar, if you want to answer that.

 

Ed: Do you guys know what it is?

 

Monika Schaefer: I mean, me, I think it’s the holocaust, but go ahead, Oscar.

 

Ed: No, no, it’s not even close! The biggest lie that they’ve told us is that they are the sovereigns. Okay? Here, what I’m saying. They have told us over and over and over and over that they, the government, and of course, the people that will operate the government are the sovereigns. That’s what they’ve told us over and over and over.

 

And so what does that do to the mindset of all the people? It makes them believe, obviously, it makes them believe that they don’t own anything, that they are serfs, I guess, if you want to call it that.

 

But the truth is, Donald Trump has said this several times. And I guess it goes in one ear and out the other. But he said many times:

 

“This country belongs to you guys!”

 

And that is absolutely, 100% correct!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I guess in terms of thinking that we are governed, who has the right to govern us. That’s what you’re saying, right? In effect.

 

Ed: Right!

 

Monika Schaefer: Oscar, do you want to comment on that? Because we only have a little bit of time left, and I’d like to give you the chance to comment on that, Oscar.

 

Oscar: Well, that’s a very good point, because most people, you know, look to government to solve all our problems, and they’re the ones creating all the problems. So it’s, again, it’s kind of an upside down situation. We have to stop being so dependent on the government. But the government, that’s one of the things they do is they want to make us more and more dependent on the government. You know, they want to bring in Universal Basic Income and all that stuff.

 

Monika Schaefer: Very communist. So we only have a minute left, and I would just like to thank you so much for coming on, Oscar. That was really, really interesting. I enjoyed it a lot.

 

I also want to tell the listener that next week, Blackbird9 is going to be taking my spot. This was a commitment I had even before I took on this show. So he’s going to be gracious enough to extend his Snack Shack to 2 hours. So I will see you all in two weeks from now. But thank you, Oscar!

 

And if you want to have a last word, you have about a half a minute. And thank you also to Ed and the other callers for calling in. Thank you. Go ahead, Oscar.

 

Oscar: Okay, Monika. Yeah, thanks for having me on. I would just say that from what we’ve seen, especially with Covid, don’t comply with the next fake agenda that they try and push on us. You know, don’t comply with digital ID, digital currency, don’t comply with bird flu, or don’t comply with anything to do with the Green New Deal. Vote with your dollar. It’s much more effective than your vote at the ballot box.

 

Monika Schaefer: Thank you. Those are really good last words. Thank you so much! Okay, bye for now!

 

[58:27]

 

[music]

 

[58:49]

 

[ad]

 

[59:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/21/2024 = 0)

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

Joel Davis: We are live for another episode of the show. It is the 6th of June 2024, another show for you guys this evening. And we’ll do a little bit about current events.

 

But as usual, usually in current events, the only ones that are actually interesting are things that are involving us in some way, our community, our people. And it’s been our people, as in like, literally like the nationalist scene. There’s quite a few interesting stories actually to cover this evening from our scene. So we’ll actually go through those because, yeah, conventional politics as engaging in Canberra is, as usual, quite boring and slow grind and same old, same old.

 

So again, not too much to discuss around that subject. But just before we get into it, how you feeling, Blair? I saw you last night. You’re in pretty good spirits. It seems like you’ve been putting out a lot of new videos.

 

By the way, people can subscribe to you. You have a Rumble now, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: I do, yeah. Yeah. There’s no space between my name, so it just is BlairCottrell. One word, because I just start loading videos. But apparently you have to make a channel in order to upload videos to that channel.

 

But if you don’t, it still uploads videos to your username. Not really sure why it does that, but I’ll figure it out, guys. For now, it’s just my full name without spaces. I’ll be commenting, joining you with the contributions and the comments on this particular stream, so be able to find my link there. But I’ve also just posted some reaction videos to YouTube this past week. I’ve had a bit of fun making those, actually. I think our guys need a bit of content that’s not so serious, doom and gloom all the time. Stuff that we can kind of relax to and enjoy.

 

So I’m gonna put a bit of energy into making content like that just to keep us all sane, keep us all within the realm of normal. We need to have a bit fun. We don’t have as much fun as we should have sometimes, in fringe politics, in nationalism.

 

So that’s the goal. What do you reckon?

 

[02:19]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but everyone go and subscribe. Well, if you subscribe to Blair on Telegram, then you’ll be able to see the links to the videos. But he is just doing a lot more shorter content on Rumble. So go subscribe to his Rumble.

 

If you want to send a Superchat, send Superchats on Rumble or Odysee. By the way, I will keep an eye on it through the stream. So I’ll read them out as they come in when I catch them.

 

 

But the first story that we want to cover tonight is from. Well, actually, pull it up. Blair wrote a opinion piece in The Noticer. Everyone go and read Blair. I think Blair posted on Telegram:

 

“Blair Cottrell still banned from X despite Elon Musk’s free speech declaration.”

 

I’ve been trying to hound Elon Musk and I encourage everyone at home, particularly if you have a Twitter account. If you have a Twitter account, make one!

 

But if you have a Twitter account, get in the replies of Elon Musk tweets and demand that Blair’s account is restored. I think his original handle was at Blair Cottrell 89, I believe.

 

If you put at Blair Cottrell 89 to refer to his account, that’s great, because people can then click on that and then see that it’s suspended. I’ve been trying to hound this, but we need everyone to chip in. We need a campaign, because what we noticed with Nick Fuentes was that the groypers constantly harassing Elon Musk over and over again, relentlessly, for months, ultimately paid off.

 

We want to try and replicate that for Blair. And Elon Musk periodically posts, and he always gloats, actually, about how:

 

“The Australian government has sent us all these notices and demanded that we take down certain tweets and we refuse to comply because we believe in free speech!”

 

And all of this.

 

But if you believe in free speech, why hasn’t Blair got his account back?

 

Tom actually had his account suspended. I don’t know the full details about that. I don’t know if he’s going to be able to jump on with us this evening, but the next time that he’s on the show, we’ll get his takes on exactly what went down there. I believe his account, it seemed, was mass reported, maybe by communists or some other, maybe jews, I don’t know, like our political enemy, one way or another. They mass reported all of his tweets, and some of the tweets that were getting taken down were just really banal.

 

Like, they didn’t seem like they were really saying anything of much substance. How they could be construed as “hate speech”, you know, doesn’t even make any sense, even within the ridiculous ideological paradigm of so-called “hate speech”. But even putting that to one side, it wasn’t like there were particularly spicy tweets.

 

So I don’t know exactly what was going on there. We’ll try and get to the bottom of that. Maybe his appeal will be successful. He’s had his account suspended before and come back.

 

So I don’t know. But Blair has tried to appeal this account ban over and over again since Elon Musk bought Twitter, to no avail.

 

So I was able to appeal my account ban and get mine back. Many others could. The fact that he couldn’t shows that it was a conscious decision by someone to not allow his account to be restored for reasons I’m not so sure of if it’s because of government pressure or if it’s just for ideological reasons.

 

But the point is that they’re saying one thing and doing another. Elon Musk wants to get all the adulation from the public about how he champions free speech, not just in the United States, but also in Australia. And he will post about this over and over again, but then he won’t restore Blair’s account. So we need to hold him to account for this.

 

[06:07]

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it comes down to the fact that it’s being absorbed by some algorithm, or my appeals, as I stated in the opinion piece.

 

By the way, guys, go and support Noticer News on Twitter, on Telegram, wherever they are, because I was approached by Noticer News. They asked me to write an opinion piece, for which I’m really grateful. They’ve been pumping out some great articles, straight to the point, very articulate articles, and getting some great reach. So to be approached by them and given the opportunity to write an opinion piece, that’s great!

 

But as I was saying, my appeals are probably just being received by some algorithm.

 

And I think we need to see, or we need my appeals to be seen by a common sense employee of X. Someone close to Musk would be great! Someone who’s actually believing in Musk’s principle of free speech. Because I do believe that that’s what Musk wants. Because X has completely transformed the political culture or climate, you might say.

 

People are calling X now a Right-wing cesspit, but it’s really not. There’s just a lot more people than any of the academia or government class in the West want to admit, that have Right-wing or nationalist perspectives. It’s only up until recently that they were just loosed onto the Internet, because before that, they were censored efficiently by various government interventions. Right? So I do believe Musk wants a fairer and more open discussion. I believe that.

 

And so I don’t know why I’m still censored. I don’t get it, because I was never, as you were saying, Joel, I never really said anything that extreme. There were a couple of spicy tweets. Like there was something about a rape, but it was kind of contextual and ironic. I wasn’t actually threatening to rape anybody, just for the record.

 

And then there was a couple of other things about taking over the country. But it was all just contextual. It was all tongue in cheek stuff, the sort of stuff that wasn’t directed at anyone specifically and was certainly not literal. Right?

 

So anyone who knows me knows that I’m pretty articulate, pretty fair, pretty clear in the way that I explain what I’m trying to explain or hit the point that I’m trying to hit. I do it well enough. I do it skillfully. Right? I’m skillful enough with the language to know what I’m doing. So it doesn’t really make any sense that I’m still banned. It just doesn’t make any sense. We need to turn that over somehow.

 

[08:22]

 

And I think if we’re going to get a chance to do it. This article or this opinion piece that I wrote for Noticer News just this afternoon, I don’t know if that doesn’t work, I don’t know what will because it really just demonstrates or lays out on the table the situation in pure black and white.

 

Anyone who reads that and understands my situation couldn’t., … Any sensible person, any reasonable person wouldn’t agree to keep me censored, to keep me banned. Because those times have passed now, right? The political landscape is changing and it’s time to join the conversation again. So time to come out of exile and a little bit excited about it.

 

But I’m going to take my time with it. One way or another, I will be back on X.

 

And when I do get back on there, I’m definitely going to be pacing myself. You know, [chuckling] I don’t want to be spending 4 hours a day scrolling and posting, scrolling and posting.

 

So like I said:

 

“I’m having fun making some more casual content, I might call it.”

 

I’ll stick to that for the next few weeks and we’ll see what comes of this opinion piece.

 

But yeah, just to repeat myself very quickly, show some support to Noticer News. Great journalists, great coverage!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, everyone. So Noticer dot News. Just go to the site, you’ll see the opinion piece about Blair that Blair wrote, I should say, immediately come up. Share that everywhere, spread it around.

 

 

Also, there’s a piece in Noticer dot News which the editor wrote about just the story:

 

“Elon Musk celebrates free speech, win over Australia’s censorship commas are, but won’t unban high profile nationalists. Elon Musk has celebrated a win for X over Australia’s online censorship chief as a victory for free speech. Yet some of Australia’s highest profile nationalists remain banned from the platform for unknown reasons. Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant announced on Wednesday that she had decided to discontinue a case against X Corp in the Federal court demanding the removal of videos of the alleged Muslim terrorist stabbing of Bishop Mari Emanuel in Sydney in April.”

 

Quote:

 

“After weighing multiple considerations, including litigation across multiple cases, I have considered this option likely to achieve the most positive outcome, the online safety of all Australians, especially children, she said. Our sole goal and focus in issuing our removal notice was to prevent this extremely violent footage from going viral, potentially inciting further violence and inflicting more harm on the Australian community. And I stand by my investigators in the decisions eSafety made.”

 

Musk responded to the news with a post on X saying:

 

“Freedom of speech is worth fighting for.”

 

[11:03]

 

“But users pointed out that many Australians remain banned from the platform, including nationalist activist Blair Cultural, who was first platformed from social media and de-banked for his political views in 2018, while European Australian movement leader Thomas Sewell had his accounts suspended hours before Ms Inman Grant’s decision.”

 

It does raise a little suspicion, you know, was these things connected? Was there a deal? They’ll drop the case if Tom’s banned? I mean maybe it isn’t that simple. Maybe if they were going to make a deal like that, I’d get banned too, or something. So maybe that isn’t.

 

But anyway, it’s kind of interesting timing:

 

“Mr Cottrell told Noticer News there was no specific tweet that got him banned and said that his requests asking what tweet violated the Twitter rules had been ignored for the past six years. Mr Sewell shared a post that got his account banned on late Tuesday night. Tuesday night it read 100%B. But X told him that it, quote, ‘violated our rules against hate speech’. Noticer News understands that Mr Sewell is in the process of appealing the suspension.”

 

It also talks here about British nationalist Mark Collett, Sam Melia, who’s in jail. We want to talk about him a little bit later, actually. And Laura Towler, his wife of activist group:

 

“Patriotic Alternative also remain banned.”

 

Anyway, actually quoted my tweet. I replied to Musk’s post with, quote:

 

“Then why haven’t you restored Blair cultural, Australia’s most well known nationalist commentator? Honour your principles!”

 

“Elon, are you all talk or will you restore Blair’s freedom of speech?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Also the article written by The Noticer, the most recent one, I forgot to mention. Share that around, guys. I’ve sent it to a few colleagues of mine, people that I know in the community. They’ve shared it around. Share it around. Let’s make sure it reaches as many people as possible.

 

Joel Davis: If you just go to Noticer dot News, all their most recent articles come up on the front of their site.

 

So you’ll be able to see both Blair’s opinion piece and this article immediately going on the site. Says here:

 

“Since buying the platform, Musk has unbanned tens of thousands of users and last month lifted the suspension of controversial American Right-wing media personality Nick Fuentes, saying at the time, ‘Fuentes will be reinstated, provided does not violate the law, and let him be crushed by the comments and community notes. It is better to have anti-whatever out in the open, to be rebutted, than to grow simmering in the darkness’.”

 

Well, I agree, Elon. So in that case, why has Blair not been restored?

 

[13:38]

 

Anyway, very important that you guys help with this, because we need to create a public pressure campaign. He needs to be hounded over and over again! Particularly whenever Elon Musk’s tweets anything to do with Australia, whenever he discusses Australia, refers to Australia in any way, hound him on this, but also whenever he discusses freedom of speech, anything relevant to the subject matter, get in those replies and say something. And like all the other tweets that are saying the same things and work together. It’s important to create a pressure campaign, because on Twitter, pressure campaigns can affect how Twitter operates.

 

So anyway, what else have we got? We got no other option, really. But if we can build up this momentum, it also has an added benefit. Like, we build this Free Blair campaign and spread it into maybe more conservative circles or less radical, less nationalist circles. And they’re sympathetic because they’re pro-free speech and they’re patriotic. That might be a conduit to them watching our show or them becoming more aware of Blair and what he does. So it has other benefits than just trying to get him restored. So really important that you guys help with that.

 

We’ve seen over the last year or so the model that online activism can really pay dividends in how, particularly the anti-ADL campaign that was started by Keith Woods. The groypers pushing for Nick Fuentes reinstatement. We’ve seen a model that if you push hard enough online you know, it does end up having an impact.

 

So, yeah, it’s not just about Blair, it’s about the principle.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, if we can set a precedent here where a little bit of pressure, a little bit of foot stamping can overturn a ban that’s been in place for about six years. I’ve been banned from Twitter for about six years as of this year, I believe. Well, that sets a precedent for unbanning people who were significantly or seriously targeted with government intervention in the past. And I’m one of those people. I was seriously targeted by government intervention.

 

I don’t have any proof of that though, right? I don’t have any data which leads back to any certain government agency, because that’s not how things operate in Australia. I can’t just go and find this stuff out. But why would I be deleted off Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, have my bank account deleted, be charged with “hate speech” all at the same time, like all within the period of six months, obviously there’s a concerted effort there. A series of agencies, or a couple of agencies with a lot of influence were told to target, were told to shut me up, right?

 

So if we can overturn that and bounce back, even if it was five or is five or six years later after the facts, it still sets an important precedent. Just like the legal system. If the government wants to get some new laws through, it can make the new laws, but then it has to set a precedent as to how it’s going to use and find excuses to use those laws in the future.

 

We need to set a precedent here in the realm of censorship, for speakers, for activists, for people who just want to voice opinions. It shouldn’t be illegal to have certain opinions! They’re not hurting anyone. If your opinion’s not directly contributing to any violence, then what’s the problem?

 

The problem is I think, well, we all know what the problem is, right? This whole government is built on this house of cards. It’s built on sand! It believes in things that aren’t true, that aren’t logical, like world equality, human equality. I don’t want to get into it.

 

All I’m saying is you should be able to criticize the foundation of the government, certain policies of the government, without being deemed a criminal, without having to be dragged to court to explain yourself. It’s common sense stuff, guys. But I suppose we’ll move on from this particular subject.

 

And what have we got next, Mr Davis? What’s next on the agenda?

 

[17:32]

 

Joel Davis: Yes, so I thought I’d pull this video up because Tom. I don’t think he can make the show tonight. He’s got a lot going on. He was originally going to jump on with us, but yeah, some things have come up this evening. But this happened to him this morning. He got an audio recording. He posted this on Telegram. He couldn’t get a video recording.

 

But basically this morning at 06:00 am. Four police officers are bashing on his door. Two of them drove all the way there from Ballarat. So from Ballarat to Tom’s house, it’s about, it’s an almost two hour drive.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is this to serve him charge sheets? Have they come to serve him charges at six in the morning? That’s unusual.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, they weren’t even serving him charge sheets. They didn’t even have charges. They just came to interview him as part of an investigation. So he hasn’t even been charged.

 

Blair Cottrell: At six in the morning?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, at 06:00 in the morning and with two of these police officers, because the alleged offense occurred in Ballarat, which, as I said, is 2 hours drive from his house.

 

So these police officers must have left 04:00 in the morning. They’re getting up, they’re setting up their alarm for 03:30 in the morning to get up and go to Tom Sewell’s house.

 

Blair Cottrell: They wouldn’t have been happy about that either. Someone told them to do that, those cops, and they wouldn’t have been happy about it. But they did it, so they made their choice. But that’s the kind of job they have, right? It would be really, before you move on, before you continue, it would be really shit to be a police officer, specifically in the state of Victoria, Australia, right now, I don’t envy you if you’re a cop in this state, let me just say that.

 

[19:18]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s pretty crazy!

 

But also, I’m not sure if the police were necessarily put up to that or if they’re just being cunts! I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no. No regular constables would decide to do that. Like, they’re being directed by someone. A bunch of constables aren’t just going to get together and go:

 

“Let’s go harass this guy because we don’t like him.”

 

Like this has come from., …

 

Joel Davis: Of course they’re being put up. They’re being put up to harass him and pressure him for sure. Because the thing is, they don’t even have a charge. Like, why is their investigation not complete? Allegedly, what happened was. Okay, so in November, there was a march. Everyone else at the march was wearing balaclavas except Tom. They marched around Ballarat. I think we covered it on the show at the time.

 

Yeah, basically they had a huge banner that said “Australia for the Whiteman”. And they were just marching around the town chanting. Tom gave a speech. They marched around chanting some more. That was it! It didn’t get into any physical altercations with anyone.

 

Blair Cottrell: At this stage when this march took place was the Roman salute illegal at that stage? Had that law being put into place?

 

Joel Davis: I believe. So but that’s why there was no Roman salutes performed.

 

But what they’re investigating is an alleged crime in the state of Victoria, “grossly offensive behavior”, whatever the hell that means. Apparently it’s a crime. It’s the same crime that they are trying to trial Nathan Ball and Michael Nelson, two other members of Tom’s organization. They’re trying to put them on trial for that. For when they threw a Roman. They performed a Roman salute while wearing funny T-shirts. We covered this on the show before a few times as well.

 

Now, the Roman salute hadn’t been criminalized yet, so they’re just saying that it was grossly offensive behavior, because they can’t use the specific laws they have against the Roman salute because they weren’t in effect yet. That same law that they’re trying to use against them, they’re trying to use against Tom, allegedly.

 

But again, they haven’t charged him with anything.

 

So I don’t know exactly how if they’re going to be able to get the charge if they don’t have enough evidence to put the charge forward yet, because, I mean, this is all on video. If they can’t find anything in the video, they need to interview him. Doesn’t really make a lot of sense. And obviously, Tom refused to comply with the interview. Like, why would you go and tell the police anything without a lawyer present? That’s just insane!

 

So anyway, …

 

[21:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Have we got footage of this interaction with the police? Is that what you’re about to play?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we got audio. We got audio.

 

Blair Cottrell: Great!

 

Joel Davis: Here’s the audio.

 

[START OF RECORDING]

[Images: Ballarat Police Station, Victoria, Australia.]

 

Thomas Sewell: Matt Hayes from Ballarat police, …

 

Joel Davis: By the way, you can hear the baby crying. So they’ve bashed on the door and waking the baby up. Anyway.

 

Thomas Sewell: What’s your rank?

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s rough. That’s really rough.

 

Thomas Sewell: And who are your friends? Are they also from Ballarat? And where’s the other one from.

 

Police: I can’t hear properly, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Where’s the other one from?

 

Police: There’s two local members from here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Locals? Knox police? Cool. What are the charges?

 

Police: There’s no charges. We’re investigating the offense, grossly offensive public conduct in Ballarat, the 3rd December last year.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Okay. And what was the grossly offensive behavior?

 

Police: It was in regards to the marching and your protest at that day.

 

At this point, it just needs to be an interview. And then you’d be right to come back home again.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So protesting is illegal? Is that what you’re saying?

 

Police: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: Protesting is grossly offensive?

 

Police: It was the content of what you were saying on the day.

 

Thomas Sewell: Were we naked dancing in front of children, like at Mardi Gras? Were we exposing our genitals in front of children, like at Mardi Gras? Is that what was grossly offensive?

 

Police: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: So which part of it was grossly offensive?

 

Police: We can talk about it when we get to the police station.

 

Thomas Sewell: White Australians having their own political views is grossly offensive to you, or to your jewish masters? Which one is it?

 

Police: We’re just investigating the matter Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Are you proud of your investigation?

 

Police: At this stage, I’ve only just taken it on, so, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And you’re proud to do this?

 

Police: … investigate [words unclear]

 

Thomas Sewell: Do you serve proudly your jewish masters? To come after and stand outside the homes of White Australians?

 

Police: Thomas, are you willing to come out and speak to us, or not?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m speaking to you right now.

 

Police: We need to go back to the police station. You willing to come with us, or not?

 

Thomas Sewell: We need to come back to the police station?

 

Police: Yep. Because any questions I ask need to be recorded.

 

Thomas Sewell: They are being recorded. I’m recording them right now.

 

Police: You’re recording it, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. You come to my house at 06:00 in the morning, you bang on my door. You don’t announce that you’re police. There’s been two break-ins in the street this week.

 

Police: I did announce I was police.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, you didn’t! No, you didn’t. Well, you did it quieter than a mouse, rather than talking to me now. Yeah.

 

So you drove all the way from Ballarat?

 

Police: I did!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. To what? To try to intimidate me into coming into a voluntary interview?

 

Police: It’s not voluntary. There is a power of arrest. I’d rather just do it more diplomatic than that.

 

Police: What?

 

Thomas Sewell: What’s the legislation that says that I have to come and do an interview with you?

 

Police: We’re investigating an indictable offense. … There’s the power of arrest.

 

Thomas Sewell: But you haven’t. But you’re not charging me with anything.

 

Police: I didn’t say that. I said we’re investigating. Investigating and charging are two separate things.

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay. You know, the last time you came to my house, you used a SWAT team. This time, …

 

Police: [word unclear] come to your house. It’s the first time I’ve come here. So, I’d rather do it like this. We’ll go to the police station, do an interview. Bring you back home. That’ll be it for today.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I have to see some paperwork from the court.

 

Police: There is no paperwork in regards to an investigation.

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay, well, I’m not complying with your investigation.

 

Police: So you’re not going to come out?

 

Thomas Sewell: I will at some point. Yeah.

 

Police: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: I got to go to work, because I actually have a job. I’m not just a piece of shit that harasses White Australians. Yeah. I’m not a little attack dog for the state. I actually go to work. Do, you know what that feels like? Did you used to have a job and now you just serve the jews?

 

Police: I’m not going to stand here and argue with you, Thomas. It’s pretty simple.

 

[END OF RECORDING]

 

[25:51]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, okay. A few thoughts are running through my head here, and someone’s asked me in the comments, Nathan here asks:

 

“Do I know anything about police being able to arrest someone in order to investigate them for an indictable offense, or force them into an interview?”

 

No, I don’t. I’ve never heard of that before. It’s my understanding that if you don’t want to go sees.

 

Joel Davis: It’s just straight up bullshit!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been my understanding they would need a warrant for your arrests to force you to go to the police station. Right? They can’t just make you go. That’s my understanding of how the law works.

 

So this is interesting. I’ve never had this kind of treatment from police before, personally. I’ve never seen or heard of this happen before. So, yeah, it’s interesting.

 

But I think Tom did well remaining calm, especially because that’s his family home. That’s where his partner is. That’s where his child is. His partner’s. I won’t give any personal information away or watch what I say. But he stayed calm. That’s impressive! Did he end up actually going, do you know, if he went outside and went with them or not? Or did he stay inside?

 

Joel Davis: My understanding is that basically told him to go fuck themselves and went to work. I think he’s on site by 07:00 am.

 

So, I mean, he’s probably having to go to his work.

 

[27:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s in construction. They start at 07:00, like they start a quarter to seven. That’s when they start unpacking the tools.

 

But it felt like to me he was being threatened. That’s what it sounded like. It sounded like when he opened the door, they wanted him to open the door so they could jump on him! Even though they don’t have a warrants. But I don’t know. He was faced with two possible choices there. He could do what he did, which I don’t think was a bad thing, but he could have gone with them and just given a “no comment” interview.

 

Maybe they feel, I don’t know, there must be some box ticking they have to do in order to successfully charge him for something that they don’t have a lot of evidence for. And that’s really arbitrary. Which is “grossly offensive conduct” during a political protest because of something he said. Right?

 

So maybe they have to say they’ve interviewed him and that’s going to contribute to their investigation somehow. I don’t know, they seem really keen on getting this interview with him and I’m not really sure why.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it is bizarre! Unless it was just a pretext to harass him and that this is what this is all about, just maximizing his harassment.

 

But, yeah, it doesn’t seem to make any sense.

 

But, yeah, you can see that they were basically threatening, they said:

 

“We have power of arrest.”

 

So basically threatening him with arrest, but couldn’t actually explain how it would be legal to arrest him. They’re not charging him with a crime. So what, police can just go around and arrest people because they feel like it? Like that’s not really how it works, is it? So.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it’s definitely. I don’t know. I just don’t know why getting an interview with Sewell about a pending investigation is so important. Is it that important to try?

 

Joel Davis: You can’t be compelled to say anything to a police interview. You can say:

 

“Give me the charge, I’ll say nothing to you, and then I’ll see you in court.”

 

That’s how it works. You don’t have to say shit to the police! Under any circumstances. You can get legal representation and the police can put the evidence that you’ve committed a crime before a judge, and then you can make representations in your defense. You don’t have to say anything to the police.

 

[29:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s possible, … That’s true, but do you think it’s possible, it’s a long shot, but are they trying to provoke a response from him that they might be able to use against him by banging on his door that early in the morning and trying to intimidate him into giving an interview that he doesn’t want to give, to go to the police station. Are they trying to get him angry? Maybe. I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Thinking like, maybe you’re in the morning, when you wake up, that’s when you’re maybe cold.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone’s colder in the morning. If you go to bed with a particular, you go to bed with heartache [headache], for example, you sleep on it, you wake up, you’ll notice you’re colder in the morning. Everyone feels less in the morning.

 

So I don’t know whether that’s going to make him more rash or less, but it’s just strange. It’s very strange behavior from Victoria police. But after those lockdowns, man, after that pandemic nonsense, nothing surprises me anymore.

 

Joel Davis: So some dumbass in the Rumble live chat saying:

 

“Oh, we should support police officers. Police officers are our guys, and we don’t want to alienate them.”

 

You’re a fucking retard! The state, the security arm of the state! And I posted about this on Telegram. I talk about this over and over again, this concept of anarcho-tyranny. The security arm of the state enforces anarcho-tyranny. Meaning they don’t actually enforce the law competently when it comes to actually keeping White people safe, keeping communities safe. But they overextend the law tyrannically against patriotic activist elements in society that are trying to organize some kind of political resistance to the multiracial anarchic conditions that they’ve created.

 

You know I remember Tom saying, actually, the last time that he went to court, that there was a bunch of hearings before his hearing where they were like, black rapists and grievous bodily harm, assault. Tom actually is here now, so he can actually discuss it himself. But people get away with murder in the court system in this country. Like pedophiles, rapists, gangbangers. They’re in and out of jail.

 

Blair Cottrell: Gang bangers! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s true. They’re in and out of jail. They give really weak sentences. Particularly they:

 

“Oh, I’m a refugee. And I came to Australia and I couldn’t get a very good education because I’m a refugee. And so that’s why I started selling drugs. That’s why I went down this dark path, and that’s why I committed this crime!”

 

And then they go:

 

“Oh, we’ll take that into consideration.”

 

And then, you know, they’re back out on the street. That happens. The legal system has been totally neutered as an effective way of keeping normal White people safe in their own country from these elements, while at the same time they break their own rules and extend their own rules in order to tyrannize those of us that try to provide any kind of resistance to this, any kind of common sense alternative, any kind of patriotic resistance. That’s what anarcho-tyranny is, and we can see that very clearly.

 

So insofar as the police, particularly after what happened during Covid as you said, Blair, if you are a police officer in 2024, that means you saw how they treated your fellow citizens during Covid. That means you’ve seen how there’s been a total breakdown in law and order. You’ve seen the total double standard in political policing in this country, and you’ve decided:

 

“I’m going to go and earn a paycheck working for the state that is conducting itself in this manner.”

 

[33:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: Piece of shit!

 

Joel Davis: That means you’re a piece of shit! Fuck you! We have no, no respect for the fucking police!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not necessarily about how the state treated the fellow citizens of the police. It’s how they treated the police as well. You had to get vaccinated to keep your job, and you’re being suspended and laid off if you didn’t do it, or if you didn’t follow their directives about bullying people and moving people on and shooting people in the face with rubber projectiles for protesting, which is their right.

 

Anyway, what happened after that, Tom? Now that you’re here, I’m really interested. What happened after that recording stopped? Did you go out to speak with them? Did you just wait until they left? What happened?

 

Joel Davis: We listened to the recording, by the way, that you just posted. We just played it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: Just so you know.

 

Thomas Sewell: So after that I got my clothes on. Like, I got “arrest clothes” on, you know what I mean? Comfy clothes in case I was put in a cell for 24 hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Stuff that you might be wearing for a few weeks while you’re in the police cells waiting for a cell to be free. Yeah, I get it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Like, put, like, trackies on and nice winter socks and, like, two Hoodies and got ready for it. You got to get ready for it, and kiss the baby and had a coffee with Beck. I kind of just made him wait out the front for a bit. Because I noticed there wasn’t a SWAT team.

 

So I was like, if they are going to arrest me, they’re going to either have to call for backup or wait for me to come out. So I’ve got time to just burn, just have a coffee, just chill, because you just don’t know. Because last time this happened, they just refused me bail. So what should have been like maybe two days or at most two weeks in the cells to be able to go in front of a magistrate, turned into seven months?

 

And then the judge was like:

 

“Wait, why is this person still in the cells after seven months?”

 

So when you kind of got the experience I have with the anarcho-tyranny. Well, the tyranny side of things. Well, actually the anarchy side of things as well, because they fired on Tim’s home, I remember, and they did absolutely fucking nothing about that!

 

[35:13]

 

So it’s anarchy when it suits them and tyranny when it suits them. After that, yeah, I had a coffee and then I went back to the window next to the door to talk to them and they had a little team meeting. I was kind of listening in on them and they weren’t sure what to do. And the guys, they were just lying through their teeth. So they were banging on the door really loud but not saying anything.

 

So when he said:

 

“Oh, we did identify as police.”

 

They didn’t. And we have had two break ins on that street this week. So they were banging on the door pretty loud and then they kept saying:

 

“Thomas, come to the door.”

 

Which doesn’t identify yourself as police. Just because the home invader knows my name doesn’t mean it’s police. But they didn’t say:

 

“Thomas, come to the door.”

 

Until after, like the third or fourth time banging on the door.

 

And then at one point they threatened that they were going to bash the door in. Again, not identifying as police. Just if you don’t answer the door, we’re going to bash the door in. So that could be anybody.

 

So that’s a very dangerous game that the police play.

 

But, yeah, after that video, after the coffee, I went back to the window and I just simply said to them:

 

“Can you give me one good reason why I should come to the police station with you now?”

 

I want to tell all the viewers at home, I highly recommend that you don’t engage with the police. I highly recommend that you just, “No comment” everything. You don’t engage with them, you don’t talk to them, you don’t answer the door. If they’ve got a warrant for your arrest, they’ll say it. They’ll have a warrant for your arrest. If they’ve got a search warrant for the property. They’ll say it. They’ll say:

 

“We have a search warrant for the property.”

 

If you have a camera set up or you have a peep hole or something, you’ll be able to see that they’ve got the paperwork. And they’re just like:

 

“Yep, answer, open the door. We’ve got the paperwork. We’ve got a search warrant. We have to come inside.”

 

Whereas what this cop was saying was like:

 

“You need to come down to the station to talk to us. It’s not voluntary. We have powers of arrest.”

 

These are all manipulation methods. The police are professional liars! The things they said, like:

 

“You need to, or you must, or, we have powers of arrest.”

 

[37:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve always said the cops, the best cops, are actually just criminals wearing a uniform. How do you catch a criminal? With criminals! They need to be able to think like a criminal. Right?

 

But a thought occurred to me while you were speaking, and I just wrote it down here. I think maybe the reason they’re so desperate to do this interview with you, why they go into such lengths, they could be confident that they can get you to admit to something by asking you questions in a certain way in relation to your protests in Ballarat. They’re confident that if they can interview you, they can get you to admit something that will secure their best chance for prosecution. That must be why they’re so keen on getting this interview. And you still haven’t given it, right. Have you actually interviewed, been to the interview?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. I haven’t done an interview.

 

So what I said to them was, in summary, I said to them that they’re getting a “no comment” interview. If they do arrest me when I leave the house, they’re getting a no comment interview, and they need to be aware of that.

 

And as my disclaimer says, I highly recommend that you don’t even do what I did to all the viewers at home. You don’t engage with the police the way I did. I kind of have to for propaganda efforts, but I highly recommend that you don’t.

 

And if you do get arrested, if they are being serious, and it isn’t just lies and threats, you need to give a no comment interview. So although I might engage with the police, I can play every interview that I’ve ever had with them and it’s no comment to everything. When you’re in that-cell and they’re recording you, just no comment, everything. And people need to understand that obviously, the police aren’t our friends, and I see comments in the chat, like:

 

“Oh, but the police are mostly Right-wing.”

 

Yes, yes, yes! And I did a video answering this. They might be sympathetic to us as individuals, but ultimately they’re mercenaries and they’ll still do their job. Their sympathy won’t stop them from doing their job, which is to harm you, to harm your family! They took my car off me for three years for, basically a brawl, for self defense. So they will do everything they can to imprison and entrap. I mean, you got to think about all.

 

Blair Cottrell: You just got your car back recently, right? The one they were holding?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think, two weeks ago, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they took that car in relation to an investigation. Was it out in Cathedral Ranges?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct, correct.

 

[39:30]

 

Blair Cottrell: And how long ago did you get cleared of those charges?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, we were originally cleared of them about, I think, seven or eight months ago.

 

But then they did the appeal to the Supreme Court which gave them the ability to hold it for longer.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, but was there any real reason to keep holding the car up to the date of the appeal? Probably not.

 

Thomas Sewell: So when my lawyer asked:

 

“Why do the police still have my car?”

 

The police said that:

 

“We found his DNA in the car.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, if that’s on file, why do they need to keep the car?

 

Thomas Sewell: Because it’s part of the investigation. That’s what they said. They said:

 

“It’s part of the investigation because we found his DNA in his car.”

 

That’s right. My DNA was in my own car!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good car too. So it’s sad that it was out of action for so long.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I really want that retard who left the Rumble comment about how we need to support the cops, not alienate the cops, to just step outside, turn the stream off, step outside and just spend five minutes thinking about how much of a fucking retard you are!

 

And then when you realize that you’re a retard, then you’re permitted to turn the stream back on.

 

And if you don’t realize, I don’t want you turning the stream back on. I want you just to stay out there in the freezing cold all night. Because these people are fucking scum! And you can say whatever private beliefs they have is, as Tom said, is totally irrelevant! They have chosen to earn a paycheck working for the enemy, working for ZOG. And so therefore they are fucking scum! They don’t have to do that. And they can quit anytime they want and go and get a regular job like the rest of us. They choose not to.

 

So they can go fuck themselves! We should not offer them or they shouldn’t offer them any respect. I understand with the military, it’s a bit different. You might want to offer them some more respect. You know, thing is, they don’t really fight real wars, so why are we respecting them either? But they’re not brutalizing Australian citizens, right? They’re not tyrannizing Australian citizens. The police are! The police are worthy of zero respect!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

So the other conversation that I had with them, because I could tell he didn’t really want to talk to me because it was obvious I was recording. So I said to him:

 

“Look, as a gesture of good faith, I’ll Chuck my phone in the other room. And I need you to tell me why you’re actually here. You need to tell me why you’re actually here.”

 

And he was like:

 

“How do I know you’re not recording?”

 

I was like:

 

“I threw my phone in the other room.”

 

[42:00]

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, what would it even matter? What would matter if you were recording? If it’s all legal and it’s part of due process, why would it matter if you were recording?

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! Of course. Because it’s not.

 

And so I said:

 

“Just man to man, give me one good reason. Explain to me what law I’ve broken. Explain to me what I’ve done that’s grossly offensive. That deserves you to drive all the way from Ballarat to my house and bring me down to the police station against my will. Cause apparently it’s not voluntary. Give me one good reason why I should come out of the house and engage in that process with you.”

 

And he said:

 

“I’m not gonna give you a reason because it’s not gonna be good enough for you anyway. And so I’m not gonna argue with you.”

 

And I said:

 

“No, no. Entertain me. Entertain me! Give me just one good reason.”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, it was, you know what you did was one of your slogans was grossly offensive, and a member of the community complained.”

 

And I said:

 

“So is that how that works? So I’m grossly offended by your behavior right now. Do I come to your house? Do we send men to your house and stand out the front of your house at 06:00 in the morning? Is that how it works?”

 

He goes:

 

“No, no, no. That’s not how it works.”

 

I said:

 

“No, no, no, you tell me because I’m naive. I’m politically naive. I’m an idiot! I think we live in a democracy!”

 

And then they all laughed and they went:

 

“Oh, you’re not naive, Tom. Come on! You’re not naive. You know!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, yeah, you’re right. We don’t live in a democracy. So how it works is some faggot complained and you want to take me down to the station because you do the marching orders for faggots. That’s it! What else is there to it? What have I missed? You know, explain to me.”

 

And when I got their names off them, something that I don’t think I said it on camera, but after I turned off the camera, after I turned off the recording, I said to them, I read out their names back to them and they said:

 

“Yep, that’s correct.”

 

And I said:

 

“Those are all good Aussie names. You’re all good Aussie blokes. It’s great to see that Victoria police is in good hands. These good Aussie White men still in the Victorian police force. And it takes good, strong Aussie blokes to come to houses of good, strong Aussie blokes that upset faggots and brown people. How great it is!”

 

[44:05]

 

And they all laughed. They all thought that that was quite hilarious! And I said:

 

“But the problem is that it’s not good Aussie blokes that are in charge of Victoria police. You might be good Aussie blokes. Good, solid Aussie blokes. You know, fair dinkum Aussie blokes love your country, but you’re licking the boots of faggots! Faggot jews are telling you what to do and giving you your marching orders. And so it doesn’t matter how good quality you guys are, ultimately you’re going to do the bidding of these people, aren’t you?”

 

And they didn’t want a bar of that. And they put their head back in the sand, like looked back at their shoes.

 

And then the last thing he said was:

 

“So are you coming out for an interview or not?”

 

And I said:

 

“No, fuck off!”

 

And then the sun started coming up and they just turned and looked at each other. They had a little group meeting and then they fucked off!

 

Now, that doesn’t mean it’s over. There’s still a strong chance that they’ll come to arrest me on another date, but they’ll need a warrant. They’ll need to go to a judge. And that’s the argument that I was having with them. I was like:

 

“Where’s the paperwork? Show me the paperwork from the judge.”

 

And this is what people that are watching need to know. For them to arrest you, they need a warrant. Unless they catch you in the commission of a crime. If you’re committing a crime, they don’t need a warrant. If you’re in the commission of a crime, they can catch you on the spot and arrest you. They can say you’re fleeing the scene or whatever. Right. But they need to get a warrant for your arrest from a judge.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t think that’d be so difficult for them either. Maybe some judges are giving them grief and not signing off on some warrants. Like, it was my understanding that it was easy for police to get a warrant for pretty much whatever they wanted. But that might be wrong. Like, that might be totally wrong. Maybe they get trouble.

 

Joel Davis: Would this be the first time in Australian history where someone is getting arrested for conducting a peaceful political rally?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, that happens. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Maybe during Covid, but that was different because they were saying:

 

“Oh, they were violating the Covid rules.”

 

But this is straight up for the political rally itself.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s closer to what Blair got charged with. It’s closer. What Neil Erickson sent to me was he sent me the law. These laws, this “grossly offensive” law was passed. Did you guys already cover this on stream? They were passed by the Andrews government because of the Dick Pusey incident. Does everyone remember the Dick Pusey incident?

 

[46:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do we have to call it that? [chuckling] Is there a different way we can phrase it or do we have to call it that?

 

Thomas Sewell: The Richard Pusey incident. The Dick Pusey incident? Isn’t that what it’s called?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, man. Well, is his name actually Richard Pusey?

 

Thomas Sewell: His name is Richard Pusey.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, well, we have to call it that. I suppose.

 

Thomas Sewell: We have to call it the Dick Pusey incident.

 

Blair Cottrell: So take us from the top. What is that incident? Take it from the top.

 

Thomas Sewell: The incident is there was some, like, he was a loan shark. Not a loan shark. He was a mortgage broker. Rich, wealthy guy with an Asian wife.

 

Blair Cottrell: In Melbourne. Right? This happened in Melbourne?

 

Thomas Sewell: In Melbourne. And he was high on coke, driving down the freeway. He got pulled over by cops on the Eastern freeway near the Chandler highway exit. And four cops got out of their car to surround his, like, BMW.

 

And then a fucking methed out of his head Iranian, like, killed all four police officers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, like, drove into them. I remember this, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. Like, this meth head, Iranian killed four cops. And then Dick Pusey got out of his car high on coke and filmed the dead police officers and said:

 

“You pieces of shit have ruined my day. Fuck you!”

 

And then he got back in his car and drove off.

 

Blair Cottrell: Brutal! That’s brutal!

 

Thomas Sewell: And the media gave more attention to Dick Pusey than they did the methed out Iranian that actually killed the cops. No one knew, I don’t even know the name of the meth head that killed the cops. We don’t know how much jail time he got sentenced to. Probably still in jail. He probably got ten years or 20 years or something. He probably got a long time for dangerous driving and driving under the influence and culable manslaughter and all those fucking charges.

 

But Dick Pusey, they locked him up, I’m pretty sure, without trial for 18 months. He ended up in a mental Institute.

 

And then he started claiming he was a tranny and started trying to play the system. He was like a lobitarian type character, kind of funny, but also not based.

 

Blair Cottrell: The point is they brought in a new law specifically because of what he did.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: What I want to know about the parents. Yeah, I want to know about the parents, though. Imagine, like, your last name is Pusey, and you’re like:

 

“Yes, his name is Richard!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Like, yes!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yes!

 

[48:22]

 

Joel Davis: That’s a fucked up genetic line this guy’s coming from!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And he had an Asian wife anyway, and she probably left him when he got put in jail.

 

So the media were like:

 

“Oh, my God! Dead police officers mocked! This is the most horrible crime to ever happen!”

 

Not the killing of the police officers. They didn’t really care too much about that they cared that the police were mocked when they were dead.

 

And so they passed. They made a new law. Andrew’s government drafted up a new law about this “grossly offensive” behavior and that it was contemptible to society or something like that, and that any reasonable person would consider it disgusting, and therefore that there must be jail time for this. And to my understanding. Excuse me, to my understanding, he was the first and only person charged with this law, convicted of this law.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s interesting that they’re choosing that charge, because that’s not political.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s not. No, it’s not political. It’s not racial vilification.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct me if I’m wrong, shouldn’t there be some part of the legislation that kind of protects political discourse in grossly offensive behavior? I don’t know. I have to read the law, I suppose.

 

Thomas Sewell: There is.

 

Joel Davis: If it goes to court I guess we’re gonna see, these arguments get played out.

 

Thomas Sewell: Section 195K of the Act says that political speech is exempt from the law. So genuine political speech is exempt from the law. I can’t give you the exact wording. I have to pull up. I think I sent it to you.

 

Joel Davis: Well, boom! Investigation over. Not guilty.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, that’s why I think they’re so keen on the interview, because I think through some skillful questioning, they want to get Tom to say something that they believe will secure their prosecution or give them the best chance at getting a conviction. They know that Tom believes in what he believes. They know that Tom is passionate about what he believes, and they know that if they ask a loaded question, they may get the answer that will give them the conviction. That’s what I think.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. So they hope to trip you up.

 

So that’s why they’d only ever get, … Even though I might banter with the cops at the front of my house, and they scurry away as the light comes up, as the sun comes up, I want everyone to, … I highly recommend that everyone understand to always give a “no comment” interview. And I forgot to finish this phase, and I’ll try to do it quickly.

 

What everyone needs to realize is that the police aren’t neutral, and the courts convict you. And so you’re the defendant. The police are neutral, just doing their job, investigating, and the courts are the bad guys. It’s the other way around. The police are the bad guys. The courts are neutral.

 

So the police are out there no matter what. The police, once you’re noted, once you’re on the radar of the police, they’re trying to get you. They’re not trying to be friendly to you. They’re not like:

 

“Oh, look, we’re just doing our job. We’ve got this investigation. Let’s just get through the, through this process, and then you go home.”

 

No, no! That’s just a lying tactic to trip you up, so that they can get you in jail.

 

[51:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes. Like, just to play contrarian. Sometimes there’s some bad guys out there that the cops arrest. You know, sometimes there’s some sex offenders sometimes, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, of course!

 

But I meant it from the point that they’re the antagonist, they’re the prosecutor. Most people don’t realize that. The average person on the street thinks that the police are neutral, and in the court, supply the prosecutor, and that the courts are trying to get you. That there’s someone in the court. No, no, no! It’s the other way around. The courts are meant to be neutral, at least. It’s the police that are the prosecutor. It’s the police that are trying to get you. It’s the police that are trying to get a conviction. The courts are trying to mediate. Even if they’re not about justice. The magistrates is not about justice. It’s not about the law.

 

Magistrates is like an arbitrary arbitration process. It’s more about mediation than is about the law. You can be correct and on the side of the law at magistrates and you’ll still get fucked over! Like the Family Court. Doesn’t matter how correct you are, you go to the Family Court. It’s not about the law. What it’s about is “harm minimization”.

 

It’s like this very feminine mindset, where it’s like:

 

“How do we make both parties happy? If one party is really unhappy and one party is only slightly unhappy, we need to meet in the middle somewhere.”

 

And it’s like, so your daughter gets raped by a nigger, and you’re just sitting there and you’re a good Anglo Saxon citizen and you’re just sitting there for due process and you’re just like:

 

“Hmm. I’m hoping that this person, you know, goes to jail for a really long time.”

 

But you’re just quiet and you’re silent. Maybe you’re sobbing because your daughter just got raped.

 

And then the nigger comes to court with a nice jewish lawyer. And the jewish lawyer says:

 

“He’s so horribly affected by this experience! He’s a victim of circumstance and he’s got schizophrenia and mental illness and all these bad things! And he’s a refugee and he fled war and his life is horrible! And he’s in poverty and he’s got mental health and it’s so horrible. It’s so bad!”

 

The judge, the magistrates, they’re a joke. So they sit there and go:

 

“Well, one side doesn’t seem that upset and the other side seems really upset. So we’ll give them six months. We’ll meet at halfway.”

 

[53:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that why you think everyone should go to county? They should always try to commit to county to get like an actual hearing.

 

Thomas Sewell: If you’re in the right. If you’re in the right you should go to county, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We just got a Superchat here. And it’s a question for you, Tom. White Power donated $1. Thanks, mate:

 

“How would the police force work in a future state run by you?”

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t really like talking in hypotheticals, because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a big question. There’s a lot to unpack there too.

 

Thomas Sewell: The short answer is it wouldn’t work much differently to the current one. The difference is the fish stinks from the head down. It’s not the police as an institution that are wrong. It’s the people that are in charge of the police have been subverted, and they’re communists and they’re trying to destroy our society, and they hate White men.

 

So the police would function more or less the same, but they would just have a different ideological function. So right now, the police are doing diversity and inclusion courses, and they’re learning about the values of gay sex, and they’re learning about how gay people and jews are protected species, and we have to protect them at all costs. And that’s what they’re learning about as police officers on top of their general policing.

 

What that would look like in our system is it would instead of being brainwashed with gay propaganda, they would be getting educated on our worldview, on natural law. They would be educated on these timeless, traditional principles, and that their duty is, …

 

I saw someone comment something recently, the Peelian principle police. It says here, the Peelian principle summarized the ideas by Sir Robert Peel, developed to define the ethical police laws. The approach expressed in these principles is commonly known as policing by consent.

 

So the idea is the model of policing. Police officers are regarded as citizens in uniform. They exercise their powers of police to their fellow citizens with the implicit consent. It’s policing by consent.

 

So it’s this general idea that there’s a respect within the community. These are respected men.

 

And I think that’s how police used to be. There was nowhere near as many. We didn’t live in a Police State. It was like you’d have a town and there’d be a sheriff. There would be someone that was genuinely respected by the people, regardless of whether he wore a badge. And the sheriff did his duty to the town to keep law and order.

 

But the general rule is that the men of the town kept law and order. The sheriff might only be given that badge in the instance that there was some problem that couldn’t be resolved naturally through the system, through the organic state, through the organic people.

 

I don’t like laws, and not because I’m an anarchist. I don’t like laws because I think we need good breeding and good ethics. And when you have good breeding and good habits and good ethics, you don’t really need a piece of paper telling you what to do. A truly organic state, a truly functioning society, doesn’t need many police. And if it does, …

 

[56:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well said. Deranged people need more laws. A deranged society needs more laws, right?

 

So the more deranged, the more police, the more control. Not to overlook our first Superchat, though, which I accidentally did by Smarty 98, who donated $10. Thanks very much, mate. He said:

 

“I thought I’d watch the state of origin circus last night. I was treated with a five minute long ‘Welcome to Country’ and the guy who sung the Australian anthem was 100% not straight.”

 

Yeah that seems to be the norm these days, unfortunately. But sorry you had to endure that, mate.

 

Joel Davis: This is why I don’t watch the NigRL. This is the term you guys need to use at home. We’ve got GayFL. We need NigRL to get popularized instead of NRL, NigRL. Because that’s basically what happens when you watch. It’s just a bunch of FOBs [Fresh Off the Boat]. Someone asked me:

 

“Oh, Joel, did you watch the State of Origin last night?”

 

I said:

 

“No. Why would I want to watch a bunch of FOBs tackling each other claiming to be in Queensland and New South Wales?”

 

Like, it’s not what it used to be.

 

So, yeah, I have no interest in that. But it doesn’t surprise me that they shove the football.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s kind of like, I’ve written before. It’s like cringe coliseum. We’re like, this weird cringe modern Rome where like, we have this coliseum, but there’s no one actually fighting or winning. It’s just men crawling each other, trying to get a ball. Crawling over each other. Rather. Sorry. Crawling over each other.

 

But yeah, like, I’ve written about it before and it’s a little bit strange, but sorry you have to go through.

 

Joel Davis: On Odysee as well. JQR code said:

 

“This is an incredible new level of harassment. They wanted to get Tom in the car and waste his day.”

 

Yeah, thanks. Thanks for your comment. I think goes without saying. But also when Tom, when you said instead of teaching them diversity and inclusion, I think if we were in charge, we would be teaching the police unity and exclusion, which would be the principle of any good social order. And in such a social order, if you had unity and exclusion, you wouldn’t have too many criminals.

 

Because, I don’t know about you guys, but when I’m around a bunch of White people, I’m not on edge. I’m not really afraid that they’re going to, … I mean, Blair, I was at your house last night. You were telling me about how, like, even White junkies are kind of pleasant, how, like, what was the story about the Whites, the heroin addicts?

 

[58:24]

 

Blair Cottrell: I bought a new TV when I was young. I was telling Joel this story last night. And it was a big TV, and I was only 16, so I had to carry it from Meyer. It used to be a Meyer in Frankston. It’s been replaced now by some, I think it’s like a Chinese store, ironically.

 

But anyways, carrying this TV over to the taxi rank to get the taxi back home, and I couldn’t see what I was doing.

 

And to my surprise, two heroin addicts that were just laying on the street prior to this, got up, sprung to their feet. I thought, what are these guys going to do? Are they going to rob me? No! They actually ran out onto the road and stopped traffic for me so I could walk this huge TV across the road, put it in the back of the taxi and get home. I said:

 

“Thanks, lads!”

 

They’re like:

 

“Yeah, no worries, buddy!”

 

So I’m thinking:

 

“Wow, that’s some friendly neighborhood drug addicts sort of social behavior there.”

 

I liked that. I appreciated that. I never really forgot that. And I started noticing that, yeah, like, your sort of White Australian people who are disadvantaged down and out homeless on the street, these are some of the kindest people if you just talk to them. Like they’ve had some rough experiences. There’s some rough upbringings. A lot of it stems from family and decisions they’ve made, et cetera, et cetera.

 

But, yeah, they’re not the sort of people that’s, uh. Like, look, if it was anybody else, if it was a member of a different ethnic clan, a couple of guys on drugs laying on the street that day, I was only a teenage kid. Would they have, like, beat me and stolen the TV? Maybe. It was an experience that kind of stuck with me. I was like:

 

“Wow, that was unusually kind!”

 

Not what I expected from a couple of guys that were down and out struggling on the street.

 

But just got a Superchat while I was talking there from Andrew. He sent us $5. Thanks for that, mate. He said:

 

“Here’s $5 just to say F you to the cops that harassed Tom.”

 

Next question on that Sewell. What do you expect next? Are you expecting to be arrested at home? You preparing for that? Do you think that’s going to be it? They’re just going to give up on this now with the interview thing? Where to from here? What’s next?

 

[1:00:26]

 

Thomas Sewell: I think there’s a small chance that it’ll be a proper police raid that they will come in with the battering ram and take everything with a circuit board just to piss me off. They probably won’t take my car because even that is a massive stretch. They probably won’t take my car this time. But they’ll take as many thousands of dollars of electronics as they can. So I’ll probably get rid of my laptop and stuff like that. And I’ve got a cheap burner phone anyway that I’m prepared to lose. So I’m not too worried about that.

 

Yeah, I think there’s a small chance of that. Not a massive chance, but that’s always on the cards. I just think in general they’re just ramping up their political policing, …

 

Blair Cottrell: . If they do come back to your house. Let’s say they come back to the house at 06:00 with a warrant. They’ve got the warrant. They’re showing you the warrant. In that case, what do you do? You go with them, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: You answer the door. Yeah. You open the door. I tried once not opening the door to see what would happen, and they just smashed the door. And that cost me like a bit of money to like, replace the door. [chuckling] So just if they’ve got the warrant, just answer the door. Unless you’re like flushing the fucking SD cards or something, in which case just. It’ll buy you some time. Flush the SD cards! That’s always worth doing. If you got anything dumb or stupid in your house, just get rid of it. You know? Don’t answer the door. Just get rid of it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. My policy’s always been, don’t do, … Doesn’t matter if you’re being watched, surveyed, whatever. Just if you’re not doing anything illegal, don’t have anything illegal in your house. If you don’t have anything illegal on any of your devices, then you don’t actually have anything to worry about. So that’s the clean rule.

 

Thomas Sewell: I can’t believe that bikies store guns in their houses. Like, illegal guns. That’s crazy! They are insane! Like motorcycle bikie people are insane! Like, I could not imagine doing that because you’re openly advertising that you’re committing a crime and then they’re illegally holding guns. And then if they’re caught with those guns, they get like basically five years now, like minimum. The police are just biding their time, building Intel and they’re just coming for you eventually. It’s just crazy to think about that. These, like, organized criminals do that.

 

I mean, sometimes people in our movement get paranoid about police harassment. And then I realized that there is bikies. And it’s like, we’re not doing even 1% of the bad shit that bikies’ doing. Like, the worst shit we’ve done is what you beheaded a dummy and, like, food dye went on concrete outside a building. Like, I’ve defended myself twice. I haven’t started any fights. Like, who else has gone to jail? Like, the South Australian guys owned books. They owned the wrong books. They owned books you weren’t allowed to own.

 

There was a guy in New South Wales that had a PDF. He had a PDF of something that you’re not meant to 3D print on his computer. He didn’t even own a 3D printer.

 

And I think he did, jail.

 

Then there’s like, what was that guy? He threatened to, like, firebomb Mel Gregson.

 

[1:03:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: It might have been, … I can’t remember his name.

 

Thomas Sewell: Phil Galea [sp]. Yeah, and Mel Gregson.

 

Blair Cottrell: That guy just wasn’t really all there, was he?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, no, he was a retard! No, no, he wasn’t all there. I think he was in the Supermax [jail] when I was in there, but he didn’t say anything. But I’m pretty sure his name get called out once.

 

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, once at some random event, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He threatened to fireball Mel Gregson and The Anarchist Bookstore, and he got years in jail. But anarchists firebombed Tim Lutz [sp], and none of them go to jail. Like, actually firebombed, whereas Galea just threatened to firebomb. It’s pretty crazy how that works.

 

Anyway, obviously there’s more pressure. I don’t want this to be like a black pill ever. So, like:

 

“Oh, my God, look how much pressure there is on us!”

 

Just keep your nose clean. Just don’t have illegal shit! If you have our views, don’t have illegal shit! Don’t do dumb shit! Don’t have illegal shit! And just maintain a low profile, but be involved in your community.

 

I mean, I think about this all the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, don’t make it easy for them to get to you. But while you’re speaking to them, we got a Superchat. Probably the biggest one we’ve ever had. $100 from Top Three Martin Gale. He says:

 

“Greetings from America. There are more of us than they want to admit. Keep up the good fight, boys!”

 

Thanks very much, bro. Appreciate it!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I think kind of the shittest thing about being a public political dissident is that I have to be very squeaky clean and not commit any crimes, because you’re not getting away with anything! If you’re a regular member of the public, you can bend rules here and there. You can have a little fun. I’m on no fun. I’m on no fun!

 

But, you know, ASIO’s watching and good luck trying to pin a crime on me, because I’m not going to commit one. That’s just the price that we got to pay to stand up for White Australians and not go to jail almost immediately. And it’s actually quite incredible how rarely crimes. It’s kind of funny how rarely anyone does really get in trouble for anything, for real.

 

Like, obviously they constantly dragging members of our community through the courts for whatever BS reason, but generally, it’s things to do with activism. Like you’re engaged in the public in some way, and then it’s in response to that. But it’s not generally anything that they’re doing on the side.

 

So that shows that we’re all pretty disciplined. We’re not these evil, lunatic, criminal elements. We’re just normal people that are focused upon what’s important, which is securing a future for our people.

 

There’s also another activist I wanted to mention from the community, Michael Nelson, because, …

 

[1:06:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: Just before you open up on it, can I mention this one. A Fellow Comrade just gave us a Superchat for $10. Thanks, Fellow Comrade. He says:

 

“$2 for Tom’s, …”.

 

He’s created like a tier list of donation priorities here. Starts off with:

 

“$2 for Tom’s door fund, $3 for Blair, because he’s cool.”

 

Thanks, man. And:

 

“$5 for Joel to get more cholo clothing.”

 

What’s “cholo” mean? What’s that? That’s our most pressing issue is for Joel to get cholol clothing. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Mexican gangster! Like the flannel, …

 

Joel Davis: I’m claiming it back for the Whiteman.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then why more bucks for Tom’s door?

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] So this is from The Noticer as well. Everyone, as we said at the beginning, Noticer dot News. Get on there, read Blair’s opinion piece.

 

 

Anyway, this is Michael Nelson:

 

“Australian nationalist has his bank account shut down for his political views.”

 

And this is basically just a basic exposition of the fact that, yeah, his account got closed down. We see this quite frequently with members of our community. What did he do? He threw a Roman salute in a funny T-shirt and he’s being dragged through courts for, quote, unquote, “grossly offensive behavior”.

 

And now he can’t use his bank account because this is the priority. It says here. I like the ending of this article. It says here. Where is it?:

 

“Noticer News asked Bendigo bank on what specific grounds Mr Nelson’s account was closed? Who made the final decision? How many debankings were done each year, and how many pedophiles, serious criminals, non-citizens and illegal immigrants, still had accounts with the bank, but did not receive a response.”

 

And I would anticipate they probably do have many, like convicted pedophile sex offenders and other criminals, and so on, that can bank with this bank just fine.

 

But, you know, Michael Nelson stands up for White Australians, so he can’t apparently. We’ve seen this over and over again! I know you two have had many accounts shut down, but it was interesting. I saw that story really go viral on Twitter.

 

[1:08:28]

 

Thomas Sewell: It did. It did do very well.

 

I had my first account shut down around the same time as Blair. I had a West Bank account when we first started the UPF stuff. And that was the account I made as a teenager, my first ever bank account. And it was made with a family friend that was, at the time a branch manager. He ran the branch off the local Westpac bank near my house. And he was actually my dad’s best friend. They actually had known each other since high school. They’d known each other like 40 years or something.

 

And so we had a meeting with him. We had dinner. Nigel, his name is. I’m kind of doxxing him, but fuck him! He did nothing! And he’s a senior something. A senior executive or something within Westpac. And very senior, very high up there. And he said:

 

“This is totally unacceptable. I can’t believe it.”

 

You know, I think he’s not my godfather, but he’s like, basically my godfather. And he’s:

 

“I can’t believe Thomas’s bank accounts got shut down. This is completely unacceptable. I’m going right up to the top with this. You know, this is not what we do at Westpac. This is not our values!”

 

And he did this big spiel about how, like we don’t do that. And then, I don’t know, a couple weeks went by and I asked my dad:

 

“Hey, what’s the update on with Nige? What’s the update with the Westpac?”

 

You know, he personally set up this account when I was a teenager. And the account he personally set up got closed. And he, as a senior executive within Westpac, couldn’t get to the bottom of it, of who closed the account. He couldn’t! He asked around. He asked the department. There’s a department called. It’s now called “Know Your Customer”, but it used to be called something else.

 

But it’s like the Political Commissars at the bank, and they define a Politically Exposed Persons, the PEPs, which is what we are. We’re the dissidents. We’re PEPs. We’re worse than pedophiles, we’re worse than criminals, we’re worse than illegal immigrants, we’re worse than any, fraud, anything!

 

And originally, there was something called the Counter-Terrorism and Money Laundering list, CTML. And they used to use that as their pretense that people were sending money to ISIS [Islamic State of Iraq and Syria/or more correctly Israeli Secret Intelligence Service]. They were sending their money to, … Yeah, it was just basically ISIS. And there’s a few Islamic terror groups in the Middle East. And there were Muslims here in Australia doing that.

 

And then there were obviously people just defrauding money.

 

And so the Know Your Customer division was meant to just shut down those things. But they obviously started getting a little bit greedy when they had these powers. And they would get told by ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organization] who to do it to, and they would do it to us. And, yeah, they don’t sign the letter. The letters are never signed.

 

When you call up the complaints department, they’ll never give you any information or help you. It’s all done anonymously through the bureaucracy. And this is just how these people operate.

 

And as I said, I followed the whole procedure. I had family attempt to go through the banking ombudsman. You just never get a response.

 

So I suggest that people, I think one of our members, I think one of the older guys, Michael Edwards, DNA Nationalism, I think he’s also tried to go through the banking ombudsman when they shut down his account.

 

And also, I don’t think he’s had any success with that.

 

So, yes, that’s my story.

 

[1:11:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The experience I had, when I inquired with Westpac Banking Corporation it was who closed my first account. The first time it happened, I went into the bank because I wasn’t sure whether because, look, when they said they were going to close it, they sent me a letter saying:

 

“We’re closing your account in like, 29 days or something.”

 

I was like, all right. But I just kept using it and didn’t really think about it. And it was still open for like 18 months or something. Right.

 

But then they just closed it suddenly, like right before the lockdowns. And I went into the bank because I didn’t know whether the account had been garnished by debt collectors or whether the government had closed it because of my politics. And I didn’t know which one it was.

 

So I went into the bank and I’m like:

 

“Look, I’m not really complaining or anything. I just want to know why the account’s being closed. Am I being garnished because I owe money to debt collectors or something? Or has it been shut down because of who I am for political reasons? Can you at least just tell me that?”

 

And the woman at the teller, some woman working at the computer, she just goes:

 

“I think it’s the second one.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“All right, thank you. I just wanted to know that.”

 

[chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but what I want everyone to know at home, just quickly. What I want everyone to know at home, when we say we get our bank account shut down, that doesn’t mean they stole our money. I know there’s a lot of people on the Internet that say:

 

“I don’t want to join the because I don’t want my accounts getting shut down.”

 

Because they think their account, your account getting shut down equals the government now steals your money or the bank steals your money.

 

They send you a check and you just open a bank account up with a different bank, ideally outside the big five. And that’s what the rest of us have just done. Everyone in nationalism has a bank account.

 

[1:13:13]

 

Joel Davis: It’s just a silly waste of time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s just every year or every six months.

 

Blair Cottrell: $10 donation from Big Tati. He says:

 

“I work for a bank, and if someone is told, they say someone is a commercial risk, they are de-banked. Even the general staff don’t know.”

 

I think what he’s trying to say is they highlight certain individuals as “commercial risks” and then they just delete the accounts. And the general staff don’t even know how it’s happening or why.

 

So if you go and inquire to the general staff, they don’t even know what to tell you. So it happens at a higher sort of corporate level.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, I went directly. What I’m talking about is not just the general staff. I went directly to the Know Your Customer department, which is like their political department, their complaints department. You know, I went straight to that. And they wouldn’t even tell me. The person that answered the phone wouldn’t even tell me their name. They were like, their name was Andy. They were like an Asian guy. They were like:

 

“Yeah, I’m Andy.”

 

I was like:

 

“What’s your name? What’s your full name?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, I can’t tell you.”

 

I’m like:

 

“You can’t tell me your full name? Why not? I’m Thomas Sewell. You know my name.”

 

And whenever the bank called me or the ATO [Australian Tax Office], whoever, and they always ask me for my name, I ask them for their full name and their address and their date of birth and shit! They never give it. [chuckling]

 

So I just hang up! Anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You got anything to say, Davis? Or we move on?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I want to discuss this story. There’s a couple other stories I wanted to discuss. One of them, we’re gonna pump through some Noticer. We’re really promoting the Noticer in this episode.

 

 

Yeah, I saw this article the other day. It was crazy!:

 

“Home sale sums up Sydney in 2024. Aging house and suburb where Aussies are a minority goes for $3.28 million.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Look at this bang average house, 3.28 million. This is in Eastwood. Tom and I were actually in Eastwood a couple of weekends ago when we were up in Sydney.

 

 

And remember we were going to training, and I realized I left my mouth guard in Melbourne. So and we’re going to spar, obviously. So we stopped in at this chemist so I could get a mouth guard. And it was in Eastwood. And I got out of the car, and from the car to the chemist and then through the chemist or the pharmacy, for those American viewers, it’s what we call pharmacy, chemists. Same thing. Walking through it, I didn’t see one White person. Every single face I saw. And the street was covered in people. And it was one of those really big. It’s a Chemist Warehouse, which is like the biggest, like a superstore with multiple aisles. It’s full of all these little Asians scurrying around, and I’ve got to, like, wade through them to get to the mouth guard section. Everyone was Asian!

 

[1:15:59]

 

Thomas Sewell: I saw two White guys.

 

Joel Davis: You did? Oh, they had Asian, with Asian wife?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. I was in the car and I was like:

 

“Holy shit, this is the worst spot, the Aussie spot I’ve ever seen!”

 

And then two White guys about five minutes apart walked past, both of them with Asian missuses. And then I saw two Indian Uber Eats drivers. And everyone else was like, Chinese or Korean! Everyone else! Like, I’m talking, thousands of people walked past me in that, like, 10, 15 minutes period and there was only two Indians and two Whites.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s fucked! It’s just completely fucked! I don’t know what else to say. And the houses are now worth over $3 million. Shit-hole houses.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where’s Eastwood? Where’s Eastwood in relation to Sydney CBD?

 

 

 

Joel Davis: It’s on about half an hour. Yeah, about half an hour drive.

 

Thomas Sewell: Northwest.

 

Blair Cottrell: Northwest, okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s above the bay. It’s above the river or whatever, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: I have heard that house prices in Sydney are, like, significantly worse than Melbourne. Is that true?

 

Thomas Sewell: And Melbourne’s worse than the rest of Australia, … Melbourne and Sydney are the two worst in Australia, by far.

 

Blair Cottrell: Rent is really high in Sydney. I’ve heard that, like. But it depends on where you go. Rents still pretty bad down here in Melbourne as well. But there are still some good areas, but they’re pretty far out from the city. Like, if you want an affordable rent, you’ve got to travel a fair way. So you end up, you know, everything’s time and money, sort of there’s this Crossover. Like, if you want more money, you can have less time. If you want more time, you can have less money. It’s like, what do you choose? Obviously I choose time. I’d rather time than money. With money, I’m actually always trying to gain more time. That’s what I want to do the things I want to do.

 

That’s kind of the point in making money, in my opinion. Like, obviously you got a family and that. So you need to. You need to support your family.

 

But I think once you get like an hour or more out of the city, the average rent prices improve. But anywhere, like within 40 minutes of the city, it’s pretty crazy! Like the rent prices are, .. And they’re only set to increase as well. Like the inflation, …

 

[1:17:54]

 

Joel Davis: To the point now. Sorry, finish what you’re saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it’s all right. I’m just saying that the inflation, the value of the dollar down here in Australia, is this a result of the value of the dollar crashing or is it just like an inflation of a certain market?

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re printing too much money. They’re just printing. Selling loans. Printing money. Selling loans, printing money. It’s just never ending.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, inflation that’s got somewhat under control now. But the issue is, I mean, obviously the housing market is inflated because of just the immigrants, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, they don’t count the housing market. When they count inflation they say:

 

“Oh, it’s like 2.3% this year.”

 

It’s like, well, how did property go up 9%? How did the price of cheese go up 10%? And they said:

 

“Yeah, the way that., …”.

 

Joel Davis: They get inflation down is by, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I signed a contract, like, only about six months ago for a Wi-Fi service. And they’re like, all right, it’s gonna be like $70 or $69 a month. I’m like:

 

“Yeah, that’s a good deal. It’s part of a bundle deal.”

 

And every three months, I get an email saying it’s going up $15. I just got a new one the other day saying it’s going up another $15. And I’m like, what? It was the best deal at the time, but six months later, I’m paying more than the competitors now. So is your Internet increasing as well? Is that happening across the board? Is it just me? I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t know, Beck pays the bills. I think it has gone up.

 

Blair Cottrell: Gas too. Gas is really expensive all of a sudden, because I think the government’s trying to phase it out.

 

So they’re trying to make everyone go electrical.

 

Thomas Sewell: They are trying to phase it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Even though gas provides some of the most natural heating. If you’ve got a gas heater, if you’ve got gas stove, like, that’s the natural way to cook. It’s the natural way to warm your home. Have you ever actually gone to sleep or tried to relax in a room that’s got an electric heater? It just saps all the moisture out of the air, and it just makes me feel like shit! I hate it!

 

But in order to run gas appliances now I’m paying out of the ass for it. And whose decision was that? Because gas used to be really affordable ten years ago. This country is transforming in a way that’s just depressing, man. I don’t want to black pill anyone, but I’m feeling it too. You know that. You’re not alone if you’re pissed off with the economy in Australia.

 

[1:19:59]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, everyone can feel it. That’s why I encourage everyone at home. Steal as much as you can from these corporations, whether you work for them, whether you’re a customer. These large corporations owned by jewish bankers, like we’ve talked about Woolworths on the show before. Woolworths is 90% foreign owned. Its largest investor is Blackrock, the jewish investment firm from New York. Steal as much as you can from these people.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s just disclaimer. We’re not encouraging anyone to actually steal anything. We’re talking about maybe stealing the confidence of the corporation spiritually. Don’t actually steal anything.

 

Another $5 from [word unclear] He says:

 

“To add to inflation, they printed too much money during Covid to have people stay home and watch Netflix.”

 

That’s true. I believe that’s true:

 

“Where did all that money come from to just pay people for sitting at home doing nothing?”

 

They can’t just magic money like that they try to magic it out of thin air. But money that they make that is not based or backed up by labor or something tangible just devalues the currency generally throughout the entire country, and everyone is worth less.

 

Joel Davis: We talked about this on the show at the time. During Covid, yes, because they shut down large portions of the economy. They had to basically expand the money supply in order for the government to cover it.

 

And then in order to get it back under control, they need to then destroy that money, because when they expand the money supply, they need to find a way to then destroy it to get it back under control. And the way they do that is by jacking up interest rates.

 

So they needed to inflate. They needed to jack up interest rates. Obviously, we’ve had interest rate rises for years. It’s only just starting to gradually ease off. But they’re still very high interest rates. Anyone with a mortgage will be able to tell you that. So how do they deal with that?

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t know if they’re going to ease off.

 

Joel Davis: Well, anyway, whether it eases off or not, the point is that interest rates are high.

 

Now, this causes a problem for the financial sector. If interest rates go too high, people aren’t going to take out loans because they’re prohibitive. People are less likely to sell houses, buy houses. They’re just going to sit with what they have.

 

And this kind of slows everything down.

 

But of course, the financial sector wants to keep making money. So then how do they keep making money? Well, bring in fuckloads of immigrants! The fuckloads of immigrants keeps the house prices going up even though there’s reduced demand because they’re bringing in money from the outside, or Indians will give like twelve people to a room, or whatever. Chinese investors come in, rent houses out to buy houses, and then rent them out to Chinese students, etcetera.

 

[1:22:38]

 

And so this then basically juices the housing market so that they can get away with rising interest rates and still making record profits.

 

So it all comes back to immigration, everything that sucks about the economy, it’s all a way for, … It’s a conspiracy, basically, between the elite interests in the property developer industry and the financial industry, the large corporations that want to keep your wages down so that your wages rise slower than inflation.

 

How do they do that? Bring immigrants in! Immigrants compete for labor, therefore this keeps the cost of labor down. This makes labor less competitive. So everything comes down to immigration to fuck you over! More or less. Like 90% of what’s happening in society is basically immigration fucking you over!

 

And, yeah, I think Australia it went from being, when I was a kid, it seemed like:

 

“Fuck, I’m so lucky to have been born in this country. This feels like we’re in a paradise. This is probably one of the best countries in the world to live in!”

 

To now, I don’t feel that. I don’t think anyone feels like that anymore. No longer feels like that. People used to say:

 

“Oh, we’re the lucky country and all the Australian dream.”

 

When was the last time you ever heard that phrase?

 

Blair Cottrell: It feels like the country’s turned into a breeding ground for scammers, too. I mean, when ten or 15 years ago, I don’t remember getting all these scam texts and emails all the time. It’s like everyone’s trying to scam everyone in Australia now, too. There’s no morality, there’s no honesty, there’s no integrity. Everyone’s just trying to rip each other off or scam people any way that you can get money, even if it’s through the most unethical, dirty way possible. It’s apparently great. Like, that’s what you should just do in this country. That’s what that’s kind of the attitude everyone’s got in business.

 

There’s still a few good businessmen out there, but they only operate within their own niche communities, with clientele that trusts them and that know that they’re honest, so willing to pay them well, but they’re so difficult to find.

 

It’s what’s so hard just to find an honest tradesman to come to your house and repair something. You’re probably more likely going to get someone who’s masquerading as a tradesman, who’s not even from this country and who’s just going to cause your home more damage. And then, you know, walk away and just still demand to be paid without having actually done anything. And that happens to people all the time.

 

Look at that guy. He’s called Building Inspector or something. He goes and inspects new homes where families have contacted a builder and probably naively, they’ve gone for the lowest possible quote on a home that they want to build. The builders massively underquote the other builders.

 

And then they employ all these people who aren’t real tradesmen or who don’t know what they’re doing. They throw this cheap shit home together with the cheapest materials possible, all the lowest tier Chinese grade stuff that doesn’t even operate properly, doesn’t hold up to standard.

 

And then these families that have paid $400,000, 500, $600,000 to build a new home, they’re walking into the home, the home’s unfinished and falling apart! The doors don’t work, the windows don’t work, everything’s non-complex, compliant with Australian building standards. And the builders just ignore them. They’d have to take the builders to court.

 

But then the builders just liquidate and disappear.

 

And then they’re stuck with this home, …

 

[1:25:52]

 

Thomas Sewell: Back to Lebanon! Back to Turkey! As you get back to Turkey. Back to Lebanon, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re going to build a home in Australia, if you’re going to build a home in Australia, let me tell you want to know the builder, you want to know and trust the builder. Don’t just pick the builder that puts through the lowest possible quote. Right? You need to do your homework, ask around, network and find a legitimate builder.

 

We know some, actually, if you’re going to build a house or looking to do any renovation, we’ve got some great builders in our community, a couple of them that have got a great reputation. But that’s what you need. You need to know someone. Don’t get fooled by dodgy tradesmen and like, all these, you know, fake builders out there these days. They’re just rampant in Australia.

 

Joel Davis: Speaking of our community a lot of people are watching the streams and then they see, like, NSN activism and they think:

 

“Oh, that’s a bit crazy! I don’t think I’d want to get involved with these guys.”

 

Well, the European-Australian movement isn’t something, is something that you can join without necessarily, it goes to you donning the balaclava and march around in the streets, if that’s not what you’re into.

 

So if you want to come train with good White men who share your values, join!

 

I mean, I went to Sydney a couple weeks ago. I went to Brisbane last week with Tom. And I was in Brisbane because I was on Elijah Schaeffer’s show. He lives up that way, or he did. I think he’s moving soon, last weekend. And great communities both in Sydney and in Brisbane. Plenty of guys there at training on the weekend. A good group of guys, obviously.

 

We have a big group down here in Melbourne. We were just putting the call out last night.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’ve been in Adelaide as well?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Been over to Adelaide for Hitler’s birthday. Great crew over in Adelaide. And I haven’t been over to the to Perth, but I’ve seen them post. They’ve got a good crew set up in Perth again, training, like 12, 13 guys in their group photo after training the other week.

 

And obviously we got the Tassie boys, so no matter where you are, if you’re in any, … And we’ve also got some regional group crews in some parts, I think Wagga, Albury area. They’ve got a crew together in Canberra and, like, northern, the kind of like Coffs Harbor area and up, like, beyond that, northern rivers, whatever you want to call it, that area.

 

So there’s crews everywhere. So pretty much almost everyone watching this in Australia, there’s a crew near you. And some people are sitting at home and you’re like:

 

“Well I’m a fat piece of shit! I’m not very fit!”

 

Well, that’s the point, like, come join.

 

[1:28:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s why you join!

 

Joel Davis: And stop being a fat piece of shit! Yeah, exactly! We’re not fat pieces of shit! We can help you to become not fat pieces of shit as well.

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s another thing I want to clarify is I’ve had quite a few recruits over the years that have reached out and they haven’t reached actually to join. They’ve reached out just to talk to me and kind of waste my time. And then I said:

 

“Oh, are you interested in joining?”

 

And their response is:

 

“Oh, I can’t join. I don’t meet the fitness requirements. I know you guys have fitness requirements.”

 

And what I want to clarify to everyone that’s thinking about joining that is nowhere near our fitness requirements. I want you to understand that that’s not the requirement to associate with us. That’s not the requirement to come down and hang out with us. That’s not the requirement to come down and train with us. That’s the requirement to be initiated as a member.

 

You don’t have to be a member. There’s a lot of people in the community that just come down once a month and they just hang out with us. And if they’re rural, sometimes we only see them once every two or three months, and that’s fine. That’s within our standards. We don’t have an issue with that you can keep associating with us, you can keep coming to training. We’ll keep inviting you to family functions or community functions or hikes or whatever it is.

 

You don’t have to reach this on the beep test and do this many push ups. That’s just if you want to become a member, if you want that, I guess, that role or that responsibility, that position within our community, you can just stay as an associate.

 

But ideally, you get involved as an associate. You don’t pass any of the fitness tests, but you just keep coming and training and hanging out.

 

[1:30:06]

 

And as time goes on, you start passing those tests, and we trust you, and we know who you are, and we make you a member. And it’s just a process that we have. We believe in a kind of natural hierarchy should form with all arborist structures, with all organizations. And that people should be recognized for their commitment to an organization.

 

And as Joel articulated, NSN and EAM are different organizations. I know a lot of the time people think they’re the same thing, and that one’s just a front of the other or one’s the back end of the other. The community is like a Venn diagram. That’s how I want to explain it to people. Where you’ve got activists in one circle and you’ve got people that want to train and build community, and they want the mums and bubs club, and all our wives know each other and stuff in the other circle. So you kind of got two different models, but it is a Venn diagram.

 

So there’s a big chunk that’s just overlap where there’s a lot of people that do activism and physically train. But joining EAM doesn’t mean you have to wear a ballot club, or if that’s not your style, you don’t have to do it.

 

And likewise, joining NSN doesn’t mean you have to come and train. Or you don’t have to introduce your wife or girlfriend to everyone else. You can just come to the activism. You can just do that half of the thing. Most people do both, but again, it’s two separate organizations, and we’re trying to cater for different styles of people and what they want to gain and what input they can give to help nationalism succeed here in Australia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and I’ve seen people in the comments section, they want to talk shit! Why don’t you come down and fight me? You want to talk shit about me? Want to say

Joel Davis:

 

“I didn’t agree with your take on this, and I don’t like that!”

 

Come fight me!

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean? The comment section on the show. People are saying that? Where?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I just see. No, I see it on Telegram. I see it on Twitter. People talk shit, and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I know. Everyone thinks Joel’s a nerd in some way, but you’d be surprised. Joel’s level of physical ability is above average. I’ve seen it in the gym. I’ve seen him fight.

 

So, yeah, don’t take. Don’t take Joel for granted, man. Don’t underestimate the Davis’.

 

[1:32:16]

 

Joel Davis: Just come fight. I want blood! Come fight me!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’ve got nerds, chads, and we’ve got chad nerds. So you won’t be able to out sperg our chads, and you won’t be able to out nerd our chads.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re all “cherds”.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] We got tough nerds, and we got smart chads. We are actually the epitome of the warrior scholar. You see, the warrior athlete. I’m sorry, the athlete scholar. In the true Platonic principle. We’re recreating the Overman. Yeah. What’s that quote? I think Socrates, he says. What does he say? He has a society ruled by. What is it? Warriors? Is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: He said also, I think the same character quoted that:

 

“A society that separates.”

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s warriors.

 

Blair Cottrell: What is it? Thinkers and warriors? Or something like that you probably know that quite better than I do.

 

Thomas Sewell: Like, yeah, there’s two quotes.

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s a misattributed quote.

 

Blair Cottrell: Most quotes are these days. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s two of us. Someone will put it in the chat.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I know which quote you’re talking about. I’ll pull it up.

 

Thomas Sewell: Society, I think society ruled by scholars and the wise is weak. You know, you can have all the ideas, but if you can’t back it up with force, you’re just going to become a pussified, …

 

Joel Davis: I’ve got the quote. It’s usually attributed to Thucydides, but that’s incorrect. But the quote is:

 

“A nation that makes a distinction between its scholars and its warriors, will have its laws made by cowards and its wars fought by fools.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes, that’s the one. And we’ve got another $5 donation, demanding a physique reveal, Joel. Post physique, bro!

 

Joel Davis: No, I think the misses will be upset if I whip out, like, my gun. All the honnies will be DMing me, and

 

Blair Cottrell: No-one posted. That post physique thing died quick, man. Like, I was into it for a while, and, yeah, I’m not doing that again.

 

So, yeah, it’s still kind of a good principle. I understand it, but there’s only a certain amount of time you can spend looking at guys with their shirts off before you just like:

 

“Yeah, this is a bit gay!”

 

Joel Davis: I want to pull up another Noticer article, get off the subject of how ripped we are. And wait, I’m gonna pull it up on that.

 

[1:34:39]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: On that subject, actually, on how ripped we are. I’ll just close off. I get blood work done on occasion just to see where my health’s at. And, well, I actually had, like, this growth on my finger. I thought it was a growth, and I’m like:

 

“Ohh!”

 

It’s like, right in the middle here. You can’t see it, but I can feel it. I don’t know how I came across it.

 

And I’m like:

 

“What’s that? I haven’t got tumours growing all through me? Am I going to die?”

 

I’m thinking. So I booked an appointment with a doctor. I got a scan. Luckily, there was a cancellation, so I could get in straight away and get the scan. Thought, I’ll do some blood work while I’m there. Bloods came back, and interestingly, my liver’s unhappy. Not extremely, but, like, slightly unhappy. My liver enzymes are a bit elevated, and the doctor explained that it’s probably from over consumption of carbs. He said:

 

“You’ve gained a lot of weight since you were here last year.”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I got injured, so I gained some weight just to sort of accumulate fluid around the tendon that I ripped off.”

 

He said:

 

“Yeah, when you eat carbs all the time, your body doesn’t get a chance to burn through excess fat for energy, obviously. So all those carbs are sort of still sitting in your liver, and now there’s always fat forming around your liver.”

 

He goes:

 

“Just give the carbs a break.”

 

And for the last three days, I just cut out carbs altogether, because, you know, one extreme or the other, that’s the way I do things.

 

So I just stopped eating carbs and man, I feel great. I feel great. I’ve, like, dropped heaps of water weight, and I can think clearly.

 

So you might want to give this a crack at home. If you are experiencing kind of lethargy and mind fog, which I was, and you’re kind of waterlogged, just lower your carbs. Just cut your carbs right down to, like, 50 grams a day for a few days, and you’ll be amazed at how much better you feel. Excess carb consumption is just inflammatory to the body. It’s bad for the liver. I thought I’d just throw that out there. It’s good advice, I think.

 

Thomas Sewell: Can I just chuck in a quote before we move on to the subject? I saw one recently on Telegram, I think, and it said that:

 

“The best gauge for your health is how much energy you have for life, and that if you’re depressed or upset or anxious, it’s probably to do with your diet and exercise. It’s probably to do with a bad diet and exercise.”

 

So if you don’t feel great, if you don’t actually wake up in the morning with a spirit and an energy to live, if you wake up, you’re like:

 

“Oh, another day!”

 

You know, everyone’s got shit on. Like, there are people that run, you know, $10 million companies, and there are people that work as a labourer, and there are people that work, $10 million companies, and they feel great. And there are ones that are really fat and stressed out, and they have to punch, like, a pack of darts a day to, like, cope with the stress.

 

And then likewise, there’s labourers that, like, are just full of energy, and they’re full of beans, and they’re happy go go lucky guys, and then there’s guys that, like, have to smash, and oh, I’m going to attack Joel here on accident, but they have to smash, like, three energy drinks in the morning or something. You just see them. You see the labourers, and they’re on the vape and on the energy drink, and they’re like:

 

“Oh, fucking hate my life!”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Man, that’s oh!”

 

You know what I mean?

 

[1:37:42]

 

Joel Davis: I love my life. I just love it even more with caffeine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Before I forget. The lump in my finger. I forgot to explain. What, the lump in my finger was. No! Luckily, I don’t have cancer. There’s no real cancer in my family. It’s a little bit far off, but it’s a ganglion cyst. You ever heard of that?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I had one on the wrist. The Bible bump!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. There’s, like, basically something around the joint just gets a little bit damaged and fluid from the joint leaks out and just collects into a little area. They’re completely harmless as long as they’re not bothering you just leave them.

 

So that’s what that was.

 

Joel Davis: I see in the chat, I’m Reflex says:

 

“White Monsters give me White power!”

 

You must become the White monster. And I see Skinhead Friend also standing the White Monsters!

 

So if you don’t take the White Monster, you don’t want to reach that next level.

 

Blair Cottrell: Be a couple more Superchats. Big Tati, $5. Asking me for thoughts on animal based carnivore diet. There’s a bit to unpack there, so maybe we’ll hit that up next time. Or I’ll do a separate video on what I think.

 

The short answer is. It’s probably great for a detox, purely because you’re actually cutting out anything that could possibly be toxic to the body. You’re just eating meat. So it’s not really that the meats that good for you. It is, but what’s beneficial about the carnivore diet is mostly what you’re not eating. Suddenly you’re cutting out everything that’s causing inflammatory damage to the body. And that’s the greatest benefit to the carnivore diet.

 

If you can sustain it for your lifestyle, great! But personally, I find I need a bit of glucose energy, a bit of carb energy to really satisfy my training style, which is heavy, intense weightlifting. And that’s where you use carbs. I’ll get a bit more into that later, obviously.

 

And $1 is also donated from White Power. Says:

 

“Blair should be Minister for Health.”

 

We already have a Minister for Health. [word unclear] as a Minister for Health, and I don’t want to step on any toes, but everything I’ve learned, I’m not really that learned. I’ve just learned everything I know from trying stuff and putting myself through hell and just taking random stuff to see what would happen. And I’ve, like, figured things out through trial and error.

 

But it’s about what works for my body, you know what I mean?

 

So I don’t really know what’s going to happen to anybody else. I’ve got these weird borderline redhead genes that kind of react differently to everything.

 

So I don’t know if I’d be a good Minister for Health, but thanks for the suggestion.

 

[1:40:02]

 

Thomas Sewell: I remember Jimbo was cut. He wanted to be Minister for Health, because Jimbo is always experimenting with different diets.

 

And I said to him, Jimbo, you should be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Jimbo could be Minister for Believing What Good Health is.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, no, Jimbo should be Minister for Experiments. Because every two weeks he, like, makes a new experiment with his diet.

 

And then when you were talking about it and he said:

 

“The White Power said you should be Minister for Health.”

 

I’m thinking you’re pretty experimental as well. You like changing up your diet and shifting things. But there has to be something. There’s like a team. There’s like a health team with the health minister. With you and Jimbo.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but new rule, guys. If you donate less than $10, no less than $5, I’m not reading out your Superchat because you can’t just keep donating $1 and trying to, like jump into the conversation all the time. Minimum $5. Stopping being a tight ass!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, stop being a cheap cunt! Oh, by the way, got Entropy Superchat.

 

Thomas Sewell: I appreciate whatever sent to Joel Davis so that he can maintain his stream.

 

Joel Davis: Gaped Alaska said:

 

“Joel or Tom, would you be willing to debate Catboy Cammy on National Socialism or have him on as a podcast guest?”

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Joel Davis: Also:

 

“Nice hair Blair. And I fully support stealing electricity from jews.”

 

Pogchamp, he sent, another Superchat.

 

Thomas Sewell: You do have nice hair.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, Superchat. And someone’s obeyed my new rule. $10 from Alts Cuparian. I hope I’m saying that correctly:

 

“A lot of guys I talked to in America share Aussie clips. Where’s all the American nationalists at? Nick Fuentes, Thomas Rossell. What’s up with that?”

 

Joel Davis: Rousseau.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I should know how to say that. I’m classic. Don’t be offended. I always pronounce things wrong. I’m self educated, so I didn’t listen to anything in school. You always know when someone’s been reading and trying to educate themselves when they pronounce words wrong, even names and stuff. But I think there’s plenty of influences in America, like. But I know that Fuentes is a big one. I suppose there’s no. Is there any shows like this in America? Joel? Like collaborative efforts.

 

[1:42:21]

 

Joel Davis: Red Ice, I guess. I mean, Henrik is Swedish, but actually supposed to collaborate with Red Ice very shortly. So we’ll keep an eye out for social media. I think this weekend we’re supposed to do something. So that should be good. Lana has an American accent, but she says that she’s Russ on Twitter, so I don’t know if that means she was born in Russia, but I don’t know.

 

Anyway, they’re pretty huge. Who else? I mean, Devon Stack is a pretty big. He’s like the biggest streamer on Odysee. There’s a lot of streamers, but I guess we’re unique the way that we go about things.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re Aussies, mate. We’re Aussies. There’s no one like us! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but yeah, I think it makes sense that Australians. Oh, sorry. That Americans resonate with us. Because obviously there’s a lot of similarities in the cultural experience, being that we’re kind of these, like, colonial, White nationalist constructions.

 

The same with Canadians. I mean, when I’ve spoken to Canadian nationalists, like Ferryman’s Toll and his whole scene, the Diagolon guys or whatever, they have very similar perspective to us because the Canadian situation politically is really similar to the Australian situation, which makes sense when you realize the similarity in the kind of historical context of both countries as part of the empire.

 

So yeah. Also shout out to our friends over in Britain. I wanted to talk about another Noticer article because we talked about, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re noticing a lot.

 

Joel Davis: We’re noticing a lot this evening. We talked about Sam Melia. Sorry, this is a different one. This is something to do with Rumble. I saw the Rumble CEO retweet this Noticer article, by the way.

 

But anyway, we’ll go here:

 

“British nationalist who has been jailed for two years.”

 

We talked about him, that’s Sam:

 

“For putting up stickers, is denied access to his own children due to his political views.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I heard about that.

 

Joel Davis:

 

“According to a statement by his wife, Laura Towler, prison officials have classified her nonviolent husband as a so-called ‘person posing a risk to children’ due to his perceived racist and offensive attitudes. Therefore, she’s not allowed to mention her children when she visits her or show him pictures.”

 

So they’re not letting this guy’s wife tell him how the kids are going or even show him a picture of his own kids!

 

[1:45:00]

 

Blair Cottrell: So when he asks:

 

“Hey, darling, how are our kids going?”

 

She has to say:

 

“Sorry, no comment!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and there’s like, someone, like, watching and listening and, like, enforcing that, I guess, which is fucking crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s probably a lot of female bureaucrats in, English government, they’re going to love listening into a conversation like that, and telling him what you can’t say.

 

Joel Davis: The kids are two years old and one month old.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s really bad, man. What kind of powers would, why would they have laws like that in the first place? Obviously, probably to protect children from people who are actually dangerous to children, like sex offenders. It’s not for Sam Melia! It’s not for a guy who was putting up stickers and who had certain nationalist beliefs. A guy who loves his country. Yeah. He’s not allowed to ask about his own kids? That’s insane!

 

Joel Davis: She can’t bring, like, she can’t bring the two year old in and be like:

 

“Oh, say hi to Daddy.”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s crazy, man!

 

Obviously they’re trying to set an example. They’re trying to say:

 

“Hey, this is what’s going to happen to you if you get into this activism. You start getting nationalistic, you start recognizing what’s happening to your country, we’re going to put you in jail and not even let you communicate with your own children!”

 

I think they’re using him as an example, man. It’s like a test case.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! They’re pushing it to the extreme! And there’s been a lot of backlash. And there’s an update from Laura Towler from 20 minutes ago, basically saying due to the pressure of the prison or the Corrections being inundated with letters and emails to complain, they’ve actually reneged that decision, as of today.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good! That’s great! A massive win!

 

Thomas Sewell:

 

“Receive photos of his children. Receive letters from his children. Talk to his children on the phone. Talk about his children. He is still unable to receive visits from his children. However, HMP Hull, (which is obviously the name of the prison) have advised they only haven’t removed this because they legally aren’t allowed to as an assessment has already started to take place. This means the assessment is already moving forward. So hopefully the final restriction will be lifted very soon. This goes to show a public pressure does work be they didn’t actually have to put those restrictions on Sam in the first place. They just chose to. Thanks everyone.”

 

[1:47:24]

 

Joel Davis: He’s lucky that he’s got a wife out there fighting for him. She’s doing a great job putting the message out.

 

So, yeah, keep them in your thoughts. I mean, it’s fucked up! I mean, all he did was literally make stickers saying things like, “love your nation” and, yeah, some where a little spicy. He’s a legitimate political prisoner. I met this guy before. He’s a great guy! Horrible.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. It’s not like he was making stickers saying:

 

“Legalize the execution of jews.”

 

He was saying like:

 

“Whites will be a minority by 2066.”

 

Like, he played the optics game and they fucking put him in prison for two years! I’m not saying don’t play the optics game. That’s not what I’m saying here. I’m just saying, like, this is how fucking evil the enemy is! And it should be treated as the enemy. They are the enemy!

 

And there’s no way of we can’t repair this relationship.

 

I want everyone to consider that as a guiding principle of their life. What the people in power are doing to our nations cannot be repaired. The way they’re treating us cannot be repaired. We can’t just win some political representation back and then the playing field levels out and then we have as many seats in Parliament as they have, and we just forgive and forget. We move forward and be like:

 

“Hey, remember how you treated us when we, when nationalists didn’t have political representation? Oh, that was so 2024, when you put dads in prison for printing stickers out or owning stickers in their house. Oh, that was, that was in the past. We’ve forgotten that!”

 

No, we’re never going to forget this. And we have to go all the way! We have to, as nationalists now, go all the way, take state power and punish these people for what they’ve done to us.

 

You know, and anyone that’s suggesting anything other than that’s maybe suggesting there’s some easy way, some simple way, some, you know:

 

“We just make our views more pedestrian and then, just nature just fixes the problem. We don’t even have to do that much. Just normalize things to the Right extent and then, you know, we’ll be, be back to normal. We’ll be back to 1992 where things were normal again.”

 

No! Don’t listen to these people. What we need to do is we need to completely change the entire system, the entire fabric of democracy, the entire fabric of society back to a pro-White position. And we need to punish the people that have done this stuff to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Yeah, there’s a lot of people that need to be punished.

 

And also another dimension of this as well is that as we ascend, like, as the movement ascends and becomes more powerful and grows larger, it’s only going to get worse! Like, they’re going to hang on to their power with everything that they’ve got, and they’re going to, they’re only going to play dirtier and dirtier and dirtier! And so by the time we do get a hold of any power, it’s going to be over the top of our enemies in a pretty forceful way at the end of the day.

 

So the idea that this is going to happen clean, or peacefully, or civically, ultimately, in the fight in the final phase is just ridiculous! It’s us or them! Like, either they jail us, they shut us down, they genocide our race, or we mobilize our people, fight back, take power, and then the bell tolls!

 

[1:50:56]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Got a couple of Superchats, guys. First $10. Bad Egg 07:

 

“Thoughts on the Mexican election. Jewish candidate wins by 37 assassinations. Wild stuff.”

 

There’s another one after that, too, but, yeah. Thoughts on that? What do you reckon? I know that Joe Rogan, you posted a video, Joel, on your Telegram that Joe Rogan basically summed this up as Mexico being, what do you say:

 

“A crack house on fire run by a jewish woman!”

 

I suppose that pretty much sums it up, doesn’t it? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, Mexico is. Has always been an insane place because obviously the organized crime there, the incentive for organized crime is just so high as, like, a conduit for drugs and other things to get smuggled into the United States, like the largest black market in the world. So we know that it’s a very dirty system in Mexico. And for this jewish woman to Waltz into the presidency and she said 37 assassinations of other candidates, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s more than that as well, because there was something like 100 kidnappings. So those were just the assassinations. There was like a whole bunch of attempted assassinations, and I think, like, almost 100 kidnappings. I think there’s 168 accounts of candidates being interfered with in some way, killed, kidnapped, or intimidated. I think it was 168 candidates.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s hectic. Spaniard needs to go over there and do a walkthrough of the streets where, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They’ll probably die! They’ll probably kill, kill them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Next up, Superchat is $20. $20 donated by a Castrated Bob. Thanks, mate. I hope you’re not really castrated. That’d be rough:

 

“In your opinion, he asks, in your opinion, what is the level of threat posed by the death cult, as he puts it, of Islam going into the future in Australia? They’re everywhere. Loved your debate with that Drew Pavlou, Joel.”

 

What do you think about that?

 

Joel Davis: He said:

 

“That Drew Pavlova, fuckwit!”

 

He said actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just trying to clean it up because I like a nice, happy stream.

 

Joel Davis: He paid his $20. He should be able to say fuckwit, if he wants to!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got to keep it clean, man. Someone’s got to do it. But yeah. Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: I admire that. I like your Virgo and Mercury placement, Blair. You know, whatever it is. [chuckling]

 

[1:53:30]

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. It’s not Virgo. What’s my Mercury? Scorpio Cazini.

 

But I think it’s just the way I was raised, right? My mother was a Virgo, a Virgo Cancerian mix.

 

Joel Davis: So was mine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, I was raised not, …

 

Thomas Sewell: That should explain a lot.

 

Joel Davis: Don’t swear.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, wow! Okay.

 

Joel Davis: I just didn’t listen.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got a soft spot for the Cap girls, man. That’s my Venus. Venus is in Capricorn in the 12th.

 

Joel Davis: But anyway, what’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Let’s go on to the death cult of Islam.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

So this guy wants to know, … This guy wants to know level of threat posed by Islam in Australia, boys. To be honest, I don’t really know.

 

Thomas Sewell: You ran an anti-Islam movement Blair, you have to answer this.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but I’ve been in exile, man. I’ve been in exile. I’ve been forced into exile. I don’t know what’s going on out there now.

 

Look, I just think we need to focus on our own community. I think the ground that we’ve lost, whether it’s mosques or certain regions, to immigrants, I don’t think we’re going to get that back anytime soon. What we need to do is focus on collaborating with each other and sort of crewing up in our own areas, maybe. But I don’t really know what level of threat is posed there.

 

I know that a strong effort was made by the government and the institutions to shift the public perception of what terrorism was. Because after 9/11, for quite a while, they needed to justify their War on Terror so they can invade those Middle Eastern countries and get the oil, whatever it is that Joel probably knows a lot more about that than I do. But after that, it was everyone’s understanding in the West that if a terror attack was going to happen and what terrorism basically was, was Islamic terrorism.

 

However, after about 2015, 2016, there was a strong effort by the press and the government, specifically in Australia, to start trying to make Right-wing terrorism a thing. Far-Right, White supremacist terrorism. They really wanted that to be a thing.

 

And right now, they’ve done their best to try to make that seem like a thing.

 

So I can say that it doesn’t really answer the question directly, but it’s almost like the far-Right activists. The position that I occupy, has taken the place of the Islamic terrorists. At least that’s what the government wants people to believe. It’s what the media has pushed people to believe. They at least want people to believe that we are on par, like, on the same level.

 

Like the media reports after that recent Islamic terror attack in Germany, were basically blaming the people, blaming the victims. They were basically saying:

 

“Oh, stabbing happened at a far-Right event.”

 

What they were saying. No, no, no! An Islamic terrorist tried to kill far-Right activists who were completely unarmed and not attacking anybody. Like, it wasn’t a stabbing happening at a Right-wing events. It was a terror attack. But it wasn’t framed that way by a lot of the press.

 

That’s because the press wants people to think that the Right-wing, the far-Right are the ones that are posing the threat to the community. What kind of sense does that make? The far-Right are patriotic! The far-Right love their country! They want to see their community protected from this kind of thing.

 

So it’s like a complete inversion of reality and the truth that they’re trying to project out there onto us.

 

[1:56:38]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I saw that article. I think I mentioned it to you last night, actually. Paul Joseph Watson shared the screenshot, and it was Sky News, and it said:

 

“Police officer dies after fatal stabbing at far-Right event!”

 

When we analyzed that, we analyzed this video on the show with Elijah Schaefer on the weekend, where it shows the clip, and maybe many of you have seen this. I think I shared it on Telegram, and I think Blair might have commented on this on Telegram as well.

 

Basically, what happens is this crazy Muslim comes in trying to stab this anti-Islam activist guy in, I can’t remember his name, in Germany. His boys do pretty good to try and defend themselves. They do get hit. They do get stabbed, but I think they all survived.

 

But one of the boys gets the guy with the knife down, and then this police officer just comes in and tackles the guy, defending himself against the guy with the knife. He had this big hunting knife, and he’s going for the jugular. He’s trying to kill people.

 

And then the terrorist gets up and just slashes down the side of the neck of this police officer from behind who’s just tackled they say far-Right activists, but he’s actually. But from our position, he’s a cuck. He’s a pro-Israel, anti-Islam, kind of Tommy Robinson type. Nowhere near as radical as is necessary. So we in the real far-Right probably would say:

 

“No, he’s more center-Right.”

 

But anyway, the point is that this police officer died. It was obviously kind of dumb that he tackled this guy, but I mean, maybe he assessed the situation wrong. I don’t know what it was like from his perspective, but this guy died because of a crazy Islamic terrorist attack.

 

[1:58:23]

 

So, yeah, that was really interesting, that whole clip. Because the clip, it really showed, it was almost like a microcosm of like German politics, how the police attacked the Whiteman for trying to defend themselves against the Islamic invader and then the Islamic invader kills the police officer for his trouble.

 

But also, Blair, I have to correct you as well because you said that we were in Iraq for the oil or in the Middle East for the oil. No, that’s something that Leftists put forward. We were there for Israel! The oil companies actually didn’t want the invasion to happen because it would be bad for business. They were already doing business there. They didn’t need America to invade. They were already happily doing business there. It actually disrupted business. So the oil companies weren’t happy about the invasion.

 

Israel wanted the invasion. [And Orgjew carried out the false flag event of 9/11 to launch the War OF Terror – K] Israel had pushed and plotted and infiltrated the US government over basically a decade long process to go ahead and take out Saddam Hussein. And they wanted to go further, take out Syria or the Assad regime in Syria, and even move against the Iranians because they perceived them as geopolitical enemies of the state of Israel. And obviously, as we know, the jews controlled the American government, so it was entirely about Israel.

 

And then the Left, you know, now the Left are willing to criticize zionism more, but they stopped short. They always frame zionism as:

 

“Zionism is bad because it’s an extension of White supremacy. And the evil Anglo-American global empire just wants to oppress brown people because it’s racist. And that’s why the state of Israel exists and that’s why it treats the Palestinians badly and so on.”

 

No jews have infiltrated our governments, control our governments, and use the governments of the Anglo-American and entire western world to do their bidding and to pursue the interests of Israeli foreign policy.

 

But the Leftists don’t want to go as far as to say that. Some of them are saying that now, actually, but all of them don’t want to go as far as to say that because that’s apparently an anti-semitic conspiracy theory which people on the far-Right say. So they have this kind of alternative illogical explanation that it’s this capitalist imperialism to get the oil and hurt brown people for no reason.

 

[2:00:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: They sometimes insinuate kind of an anti-semitic comment, but then they say no to anti-semitism, also in the same sentence, just to try to, like, protect themselves.

 

But I probably should mention in respect to that last question, that we just had a registered Islamic terror attack in Sydney with the stabbing of Bishop Mari, the Assyrian Orthodox Bishop.

 

And so keeping that in mind, and also this most recent stabbing in Germany as well, it seems like there is a significant threat posed there. It seems like the threat is real. It’s still a threat. It’s going to continue to be a threat. And we need to understand that. We need to know that. And you need to understand that when you’re walking down the street and you might be approaching people who aren’t like you, they might be a member of a particular, different faith. You need to be aware that they don’t like! You need to just not put yourself in situations where you could potentially be in danger, I think. Like, stick with your own. Stick with what you know. It’s the best advice I could give.

 

But, yeah, to answer the question simply, I think that’s your White brother. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: If I was to answer the question, looking at things at a more geopolitical scale, Australia. Well, the globalists that are in charge of Australia, have done a very good job at successfully balancing the slave farm.

 

So if you were in Germany, for example, or Britain or France, there’s a very heavily weighted fifth column of Muslims.

 

Whereas if you’re in the United States, Muslims really don’t have any power. There’s not many of them. I think there’s some Somalis in Detroit or Minneapolis or something.

 

But in most of Europe, the primary threat is Turks and Arabs coming in, same thing, sort of, but Muslims.

 

Whereas in Australia, obviously, the biggest threat we have, other than jewish subversion and our own White traitors, the biggest threat that we have is the Chinese. And what the government’s doing at the moment as they prepare for war with China, is they’re just flooding us with Indians because they want to use Indians to occupy our armed forces, to fight against the Chinese if they ever have to intern a bunch of Chinese and deport a bunch.

 

Now, Islam is kind of like a spanner in the works because no one knows what Islam is going to do if we go to war with China. And if we never go to war with China, then Islam is still certainly a major threat. They’re not as big a population as the Chinese and Indians, but they might have a much higher birth rate. Not much, because they do calm down after a generation.

 

But I think the real terrorism of Islam is not in random stabbings. I think that only emboldens resistance to them, because it’s so in your face that these people are stabbing you!

 

Whereas the demographic threat of Islam, the mass birth rate that they generally have in their own countries and their ability to come over here and leech off us and bleed our nation dry, they are a growing percentage of the population, and they will continue to grow until they’re deported. So is Islam, the death cult of Islam going to be a serious threat in the future? Absolutely!

 

We’ve got some major fifth columns in this country, and if I was to rate them, I would say the biggest issue is the White traitors. The second biggest issue, because nothing can exist without White traitors. The second biggest issue are the jews, as they simply allow the White traitors to do even more damage to society, and they work in symbiosis. Jews kind of are just like a spiritual traitor. Like, if they didn’t have a word for jew, you would just call them traitor. But they’re obviously not us. They’re just like a kind of creature that hive minds into dismantling us.

 

[2:04:13]

 

But then I would say the Chinese. And then it’s tough to say whether Indians or Islam are a bigger threat. I would probably say Islam because Indians are pretty weak as a population.

 

But then there’s more Indians than there is Islamists. And then there’s Pakistanis, which are Islamic Indians. So it gets a bit of a gray area.

 

And then you put coconuts and Africans down the bottom because they can’t really organize properly. They can’t really form large gangs, bigger than, say, 50 people, you know, until they go full chimp up mode where they’re just in like an autonomous state. They can’t organize past 50 people, but they can just form like, chaotic, anarchistic mobs of thousands. But there’s no real structure and leadership. It is just the nature reclaiming land that can’t be properly controlled.

 

End quote.

 

Joel Davis: I think the Indians are a massive threat because it’s not just the raw biomass, like they are just like so many of them. But under peaceful conditions they’re very good at infiltrating hierarchies, they’re very good at getting themselves into big corporations, into government, into all of these different elements, and then they engage in very intense nepotism and, like, drag in more Indians.

 

So, like, once, … We see this in the United States, where they’ve taken over, like, tech companies, they’ve just because of all the H-1B visa. They bring over all the high IQ Indians into California. They set up shop in these big tech companies and then just like surge up the hierarchy.

 

Have you noticed how there’s been all this stagnation in all these big tech companies from the United States, how like every iPhone is the same, and Google interface doesn’t really change and everything’s just been the same for like five years. It’s because Indians have just the biomass Indians have just like, consumed their way up, and so there’s no more Germanic ingenuity in these things anymore.

 

And we’re going to see that happening on a large scale across so many different institutions in society, because they are scam artists, they’re nepotists, they’re very status conscious. They’re programmed to ascend hierarchies and be incompetent at the same time.

 

So we’re going to see them being very effective, I think, at infiltrating. And they’re very good at being friendly, professionally friendly. They’re very good at that.

 

[2:06:39]

 

Whereas the Chinese engage in a lot of these behaviors, but they’re more head down kind of workers, and they aren’t as nepotistic as the Indians. They do engage in some nepotism, obviously, but it isn’t to the same degree.

 

So the Chinese are obviously a massive threat and they’re a hierarchy population. And then really the reason why they’re a threat is because they function in conjunction with the incredibly powerful Chinese government, as, basically a vehicle for the influence of the Chinese government in Australia.

 

So anyway, but I think Islam isn’t as big a threat as either of these diasporas because Islam isn’t as unified, because there’s so many different ethnic groups that are Islamic, and they don’t necessarily all get along super well. I mean Islam does help them get along to an extent, but it’s not perfect.

 

And then in addition to that, they just don’t have the same numbers, like in European countries like Germany or the Netherlands or Sweden, like Islam is the primary immigrant demographic.

 

So the anti-Islam thing is massive there in their political systems, necessarily, because that’s the kind of face of their immigration waves. Whereas here it’s a very, I don’t know what the exact demographics are, but it’s a pretty small size of the population. I think mainly in Sydney, there’s a big kind of Islamic community in the inner west around Auburn, Lidcombe, and then down to Liverpool, Fairfield, that whole area. But outside of that kind of corridor where there’s quite a few mosques, and so on by the way, a lot of Australia doesn’t really have a very significant Islamic population.

 

And it also seems like that the recent ways of immigrants, that Islam isn’t really making up as large of the numbers as it was maybe 20 years ago. It seems as though there’s been maybe a conscious effort to bring in Indians as opposed to these other groups. They also bring in a lot of Filipinos and so on.

 

They’re trying to bring in safer demographics because they, I guess, perceived the threat of the Chinese and Islam to the political cohesion of the country.

 

So they’re trying to bring in non-Whites that are maybe going to play ball more with this kind of liberal, democratic paradigm.

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically what you’re saying is its just all orcs versus humans? It’s all orcs versus humans. [chuckling] Like Blizzard. When they released the first ever warm Warcraft game, they were onto something. It was called Orcs versus Humans. They knew, bro! They fucking, the White nerds with the birth of the Internet, they knew!

 

[2:09:30]

 

Joel Davis: Andrew11 said, by the way, :

 

“The Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of our border is also jewish.”

 

Obviously. He’s an American:

 

“Now Mexico has a jewish president. It sounds like we may have a Gates of Toledo vibe going on.”

 

Well, I mean, the Gates of Toledo have been open for, I mean, how many illegal immigrants in America? Like, I’ve seen estimates that there’s like 30 million.

 

So the Gates are well and truly open and have been for some time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: It is insane when you think about the scale of the amount of illegal immigrants in the United States.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re up against some big numbers, but how you guys feeling? Do you want to keep going? Do you want to start wrapping it up? I noticed the chat on Rumble starting to get a bit of spam degrading into a bit of cesspit. Hey, there we go. We just got, I think the main culprit was just removed. Good.

 

Joel Davis: Castrated Bob sent another Superchat. No, wait, sorry. That’s the same one. My bad. Yeah, I guess. So we could probably end it there.

 

Is there anything else you guys want to discuss?

 

Blair Cottrell: How about you, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Can we talk more about astrology? Nah, just kidding! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m tired and I’ve been trying to get 10 hours sleep a night. I’ve been trying to make that a good habit, but I thought, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh man, I’m getting like six.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve ruined that just for the boys. Just to spend time with you guys.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you better watch out. The jews better watch out!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’d be going to bed real early, and I don’t know, the mornings just hit different. It feels like two coffees. Just that extra, like 2 hours. That extra two or 3 hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we got a final Superchat here from Castrated Bob again. He says:

 

“Somali Muslims, terrible software on garbage hardware. Good answer, fellas.”

 

That’s okay. Thanks very much.

 

Anyway to wrap it all up, I’m getting a little bit tired myself. You always know I’m getting tired when I start slurring my words. And I want to remind everyone to support The Noticer, Noticer news.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: And to share around that article that I published on my my public Telegram channel, the one that’s my opinion piece published by the notice of news. We’re basically just trying to put a bit of pressure on Musk and X to get me back on time to get me back on X, the old Twitter platform.

 

Joel Davis: Noticer News has been going crazy! They made an article the other day about Rumble, about how Rumble streaming was outperforming YouTube streaming, and it even mentioned Elijah Schaefer and my show on the weekend, and the CEO of Rumble retweeted it. The article that they made about Michael Nelson talking about that we mentioned earlier in the show that was all over Twitter. So, juice, the article, the article about Blair and Blair’s opinion piece, get that spread far and wide. Try and spread it to conservatives. Try and spread it in different, … Go on, post it on Reddit, post it all over Twitter.

 

Because Noticer has got great, great presentation. It’s a really professional outfit. We want it grow its influence because clearly you can see the editorial angle that it has is way more reasonable than any other media publication, to put it mildly. And they’ll publish opinion pieces by people like Blair and myself.

 

So yeah, shill’em, because propaganda is everything. That’s the only way in which we’re going to get out of this is by getting a good quality nationalist message to more White Australians. And getting the Noticer pumping is a key part of that, and getting Blair back on Twitter is another key part of that. So you guys got to chip in and help.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sounds good. Well, thanks, everyone, for joining us, and we’ll see you next week. Stay safe!

 

Thomas Sewell: Study esoteric Hitlerism!

 

[2:13:37]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/7/2024 = 207)

danzimmons
1 minute ago
“TasiBoy’s” lol that’s an epic name

@SammichLubber
46 minutes ago(edited)
I think it’s great how Thomas handled himself going from this audio clip. Now it’s on the record, no duh, but this places all the animus back onto the state apparatchiks directly while calling them out as such. As a big fan of truth and beauty and directness this pleases me. *Oh, and cheers from America Australia, we just love these guys. Something to keep in mind. We are not alone.

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Thomas made me day how he embarrassed those pig’s Thx

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
Great stream as always. Australia for the White Man! o/

2
0
Seth Apex
4 hours ago
i would actually say jews are the bigger threat than “white traitors”. most of the white traitors are useful idiots who will just go along with those who actually have power. if we get rid of jewish control. the traitors will fall apart and then fall in line.

2
0
Blankeon
6 hours ago
51:00
Really good point. The police in White countries are not politically neutral, they are anti-White commissars and they look for any possible way to arrest you if you are pro-White.

5
0
Indo-European
7 hours ago
Eightieth anniversary of D-Day Normandy invasion today.

2
0
Hide replies
White Power Ranger
5 hours ago
When traitors defeated the last true European dynasty.

4
0
Vol Tare
7 hours ago
solid show o/

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
JoelBlairTomLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH Spring in your step tomorrow, knowing you belong

2
0

@sparkofspirit
8 hours ago
thanks guys o/

1
0

@Pictoff
8 hours ago

@ellisfourthirty
Yeah women shouldn’t be cops, That was a good example of that

2
0

@Pictoff
8 hours ago

@ellisfourthirty
I didn’t either until a few days ago, Not sure if you watch randbot or not but he covered it, Both camera angles were on twitter

1
0

@Aurelianus
8 hours ago
the rising jeet tide coats all ships in shit

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
I’d say regression in technology, rather than stagnation.

1
0
Cannibal Humanoid Underground Dweller
8 hours ago
It’s for this reason that Indians are used by globalists as middle managers. The global coolie class (in fact the word “coolie” comes from the Indian Koli caste, who btw were classed as “habitual criminals and Other Backward Peoples”

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@DOLO
yup. Heartbreaking

1
0
DOLO
8 hours ago
They form a hive mind

1
0

@Pictoff
8 hours ago

@ellisfourthirty
The guy the cop tackled wasn’t a victim, He attacked the first guy that got stabbed, this was caught on a different camera

1
0
MatthewHayden
8 hours ago
fear of ostracisation, retribution, responsibility.

1
0
DOLO
8 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
The type that would be just as happy working in the cheka

1
0
MatthewHayden
8 hours ago
massive guilt trip. my friends dad was a reporter at that event in germany. he says germans are too afraid to speak out and only immigrants that have been settled longer are “allowed” to speak about fresher immigrants causing issues.

2
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@DOLO
What type of psyche do you reckon gets employed in Germany?

1
0
DOLO
8 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
The German cop died later yes

2
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Like that’s not going to happen

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Cops get killed?

DOLO
8 hours ago
causing the police to target the whie man instead of the armed migrant

1
0
MatthewHayden
8 hours ago
I watch these fellas and handsome truth… thats about it dont trust much else!

1
0
DOLO
8 hours ago
That has to be police training

1
0

@Pictoff
8 hours ago
The cop died

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I hear you. He’s not even worth my attention anymore.

DOLO
8 hours ago
Everything on the stickers were deemed lawful by the court

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
OH THANKS

1
0

@katana17
8 hours ago
[Mark Collett – Sam Melia – Banned from Seeing His Children – with Laura Towler – May 31, 2024 – Transcript]

Mark Collett – Sam Melia – Banned from Seeing His Children – with Laura Towler – May 31, 2024 – Transcript

2
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Sam Melia can’t even have photos of his girls

1
0

@AngryRetroGamer
8 hours ago
Very Orwellian

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
The Ayatollah is also nuts guts

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Stacksie is A1

@AngryRetroGamer
8 hours ago
Devon Stack always delivering the rage porn

2
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
rrrrrrousew

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Diet, planning, balance.

1
0

@katana17
8 hours ago
[Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT]

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
I didn’t watch his last rally (the tranny and israel video was a reference to one he did years ago), but seen some images going around. At least it’s very patriotic, just a shame they’re following a pied piper.

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Hopefully they’ll take the pathway

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
I heard it was 33 assassinations…. lots of kidnappings

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Unfortunately most Brits are too busy at a Tommy Robinson show in London where he has a tranny singing and a pro-israel video being played on a big LED outdoor screen.

3
0
Anglo-Saxon
8 hours ago
oy vey

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Keep tbe pressure on re Sam Melia, please

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
^

1
0
SuzyWaffen
8 hours ago
Your governments are at war with you.

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
They certainly have brought that title upon themselves.

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
Show us your belly Joel

2
0
Ziohazard
8 hours ago
Uberman

1
0
DOLO
8 hours ago
cultured thug

1
0
Zyklon B Peterson
8 hours ago
the spergiest

1
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
Shurrup

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
15 million in two provinces 12 million in the rest

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Most Aussies live in New South Wales and Victoria

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
The middle of Australia is desert

1
0
Anglo-Saxon
9 hours ago
yep

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
That is South Australia

1
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Omg – I used do Builder’s Cleans up to 2013… I had to buy so much blue tape

Anglo-Saxon
9 hours ago
Lebs

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
They do that in america as well

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Thats the Indians lol

1
0
Ziohazard
9 hours ago
57% White now

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
in Canada they said that theyd have ways to track the fraud, advanced methods they claimed, then when it came to light they acted as though it never happened

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Stein=rock

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Blackrock

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
there was a ton of fraud with the covid dollars as well

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Schwarzgestein

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
STEELING

Anglo-Saxon
9 hours ago
lol

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Schwarze Stein

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Lol

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Blair’s mic shits all over Joel & Toms.

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
well wood is

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Also Venezuela problems

DOLO
9 hours ago
They always do that, you have to keep changing internet provider

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
War with Russia also

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
goyim die

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
jews lie

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
The Jews lie about the white demographics being more than it actually is

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
more people means you need more money

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Wikipedia says USA is 41% White

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Who wants to be in our cities anymore anyway?

MatthewHayden
9 hours ago
so much of sydney is now indian or chinese

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
USA is like 50% white

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
correct

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
I’m sure we can vote our way out of this, especially when whites are no longer more than 50% of the population.

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
they*

Ziohazard
9 hours ago

@PattonWasRight
Yeah theg count jews as white

MatthewHayden
9 hours ago
eastwood is pretty much 100% chinese

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
Im sure its less they probably count certain demographics of non-whites as white

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Australia 57% White according to Wikipedia

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
lol Joel. Insects

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
FUBAR

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago

@ellisfourthirty
that would sort out supply and demand

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
Housing is more affordable in regional QLD

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
housing is out of reach for a lot of our people

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Eughhhhhh re house

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Lol

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
good Lord

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
You only have an account outside the big 4 until one of the big 4 buys them out

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
The noseticer

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
The best advice I’ve had is to have 3 bank accounts.

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Andy Ching Chong

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Timing

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Al Qaeda

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
Know Your Customer is the AIDS Dept

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
BENDIGO BANK, AGAIN? *sad face”

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
Bendigo is one of the ‘small’ banks too

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
BENDIGO BANK lead by women

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
Mexican gangster lol

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
cholo lol

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
If it’s not white its not right

Ziohazard
9 hours ago

@Aus1788
o/

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
“No Fun Joel” New nik landed

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Tom can you do a solo stream soon?

@Aus1788
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
Feels nice to have a clean aryan spirit 0/

@Aus1788
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
cant say i was ever corrupted or retarded enough to do such a thing.. even before I was aware of the deper truths

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
gotta love the broship where Cottrell addresses Tom as “Sewell” and there’s no biteback. You can’t beat that mateship.

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
this was a time before our white criminals were really dangerous. Pigs got nothing

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
The Turner Diaries I think

Sheeple being led to slaughter
9 hours ago
shoot back at that point

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
Cops can always plant kiddie porn on your computer even if you have nothing illegal on there

Ziohazard
9 hours ago

@Aus1788
Well it looks like he has changed his ways

DOLO
9 hours ago
Yeah

@Aus1788
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
blair takes offense

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
white people who racemix are no longer spiritually white

@CampsLindburgh
9 hours ago
if they had confidence in their case, they wouldn’t need to ask questions

DOLO
9 hours ago
A lot of the are ex forces as well

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Lot of niggers here

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
replace White man ball

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
I am american

Anglo-Saxon
9 hours ago
nah aussie

Ziohazard
9 hours ago

@Anglo-Saxon
Englishwaffen?

Anglo-Saxon
9 hours ago
miscegenation ball

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
real cringe

Ziohazard
9 hours ago

@AngryRetroGamer
Oh okay

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
men groping and slapping eachotehr on the butts ..

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago

@Ziohazard
Fresh off boat

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
What is a fob?

DOLO
9 hours ago
niggerball

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
NFL is all niggers

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
Lol sportsball is a joke

DOLO
9 hours ago
We had a cop that lived in a house in the village. I think it had one cell in it.

JQRcode
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
most people online are not IRL activists so its irrelevant who is leading who, NOTHING IRL is happening

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
During my AnCap phase I would argue that policing should be outsourced to insurance companies.

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
yes

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
and we all cry grrrrrrrr

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
According to Google, Richard Pusey uses they/them pronouns, fitting.

DOLO
9 hours ago
jew process

DOLO
9 hours ago

@ellisfourthirty
Wouldn’t you be with a name like that

@AngryRetroGamer
9 hours ago
Wayne Kerr is a name I have come across, doesn’t quite top Dick Pussey imo

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
his parents hated him lol

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
likey a juw

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@jqrcoad
In hindsight…. I get it. Who else is he fishing?

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
I thought he was Paki

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
DP is based!

DOLO
9 hours ago
That’s his literal name

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
the DP Incident

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Wasn’t he a trucker?

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Trucker right?

DOLO
9 hours ago
lol

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Anti war protesters in World War One were arrested without trial

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
courts are in the pocket of ther goverment.. cant be too hard

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
lol, that’s where my head went 1st. Do it in their neighbourhood

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
National Socialism is when democracy is stopped

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Democracy is when niggers kill White people while jews rape children

MatthewHayden
9 hours ago
the primary purpose of police is social terrorism

JQRcode
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Elijah? Its just a platform to use. Hes not leading anyone

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@SavageMyth
Car’s worth more, all in all

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
You also been talking to Elijah, Tom? I’m not fully trusting.

@SavageMyth
9 hours ago
on the bright side Tom saved 3 years of wear and tear…

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Do they read the chat?

DOLO
9 hours ago
They rely on you not knowing your rights

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
wyh does tom not have security surveillance ?

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
6 pairs of jocks

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
ZOGbots are soulless

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Hi Tom I am a big fan

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
the state enforcers are treated like shit by the state as well which I find ironic

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
no one cares how the polcie got treated

DOLO
9 hours ago
Didn’t they got forced to take the vax as well

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Didn’t someone get car bombed early hours? Keep your wits and don’t immediately react

MatthewHayden
9 hours ago
that is a good point, give them nothing

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
you shouldn’t say anything.. theres no outcome where talkign puts you in a better position

JQRcode
10 hours ago
$5.00
This is an incredible new level of harassment. They wanted to get Tom in the car and waste his day

MatthewHayden
10 hours ago
Tom handled this situation very well in my opinion. Great questioning “are you proud of your investigation” elicited such a weak response.. tough times wishing Tom the strength to endure

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
typical scumbag behavior

DOLO
10 hours ago
If they aren’t charging him then he doesn’t need to comply with anything they say

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
7am

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
It doesn’t get light until

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
did blair not once get caught with a phone that was being tapped by the police

@AngryRetroGamer
10 hours ago
Hey, it’s the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings. 10 months later Western civilisation’s fate was sealed. If only the boys storming the beaches could see what would ultimately become of their efforts.

1
0
MatthewHayden
10 hours ago
good stuff. good evening all I hope everyone has had a happy and productive week

@katana17
10 hours ago
Last week’s video is missing from Odysee. Can you upload it Joel?

@katana17
10 hours ago
[Slightly Offensive – Debate – Is Diversity Our Strength? – Joel Davis vs Drew Pavlou – Apr 5, 2024 – Transcript]

Slightly Offensive – Debate – Is Diversity Our Strength? – Joel Davis vs Drew Pavlou – Apr 5, 2024 – Transcript

@katana17
10 hours ago
[Joel Davis – On Activist Politics and White Advocacy – PA Conference Speech – Oct 7, 2023 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – On Activist Politics and White Advocacy – PA Conference Speech – Oct 7, 2023 – Transcript

@katana17
10 hours ago
[Joel Davis – The White Australia Policy with Matthew Grant – Jul 27, 2023 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The White Australia Policy with Matthew Grant – Jul 27, 2023 – Transcript

@katana17
10 hours ago
[Joel Davis – On Australian Nationalism with Matthew Grant – Dec 17, 2022 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – On Australian Nationalism with Matthew Grant – Dec 17, 2022 – Transcript

@katana17
10 hours ago
[Mark Collett – Patriotic Weekly Review – with Joel Davis – Apr 27, 2023 – Transcript]

Mark Collett – Patriotic Weekly Review – with Joel Davis – Apr 27, 2023 – Transcript

@katana17
10 hours ago
Here are transcripts of Joel’s videos that I’ve done so far..
[Joel Davis – Mark Collett vs Greg Johnson – The Ukraine Debate – Oct 17, 2022 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Mark Collett vs Greg Johnson – The Ukraine Debate – Oct 17, 2022 – Transcript

Archipelago Woes
11 hours ago
early work stream.I hope Thomas Sewell is doing okay.

0
0

======================

RUMBLE COMMENTS

ForgingZero
1 hour ago

New follower of Joel’s here. Happy to see someone saying the things that need saying, without being “nice ” about it. Putting things to your enemies and supporters alike, in a straight forward and stern manner has always been more effective for me personally than trying to be gentle with them. All people tend to pay more attention and really take you seriously if you speak to them in a no nonsense, no bullshit tone. It’s way past time to make people understand WE MEAN BUSINESS. Things need to change and it starts NOW.




0 likes 
Reply

Domenico123
9 hours ago

Blair talking about gas prices. In Australia, we have overtaken Qatar as the 2nd highest gas producers in the world behind the USA who is the number one gas producer. In the USA they are paying $2.50 dollars a kilojoule and here in Australia they are paying $11.50 a kilojoule. Those masters you take about get their foreign interests to ship the gas offshore and then import it back to Australia. Everything is done by design…




0 likes 
Reply

katana17
22 hours ago

[Joel Davis – Mass Deportations Enthusiasm, Twitter Politics & Activist Persecution – Jun 6, 2024 – Transcript]
https://katana17.com/2024/06/07/joel-davis-mass-deportations-enthusiasm-twitter-politics-activist-persecution-jun-6-2024-transcript/




0 likes 
Reply
Delete

MrGrim94
1 day ago

imagine no Jews no white race traitors all European and Western European countries would be living in peace and flourishing but nope we need to wake tf up take are nations back from the cowards traitors and non White’s




0 likes 
Reply

Doubleud40
1 day ago

maybe i’m being naive but don’t we want as many good cops in the force as possible? If they all quit, won’t they just be replaced with bad cops who’ll do anything for their masters? At least once you’re there, and you’ve got some years behind you, you at least have a better chance of being a positive influence. Otherwise, you quit the force, become jaded, discouraged, demoralized that now you really can’t do anything, and you detach yourself completely from the political sphere and you essentially become a useless normie.




0 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply

MrGrim94
1 day ago

More than likely you’ll get shot in the back by a bad cop or they’ll set you up Good cops get set up all the time My dad used to be a deputy sheriff and he was going to go to LAPD but dude said he’s too good of a man and that they would probably kill him




0 likes 
Reply

AbbyBear
1 day ago

They did all of this in all of our countries when it came to covid. I’m in the states. It amazes me we are all going through the exact same thing. Down to flooding our countries with shitty and mentally unhinged brownies




0 likes 
Reply

theuprising88
1 day ago

1:49 mins NO MORE MR NICE GUY




0 likes 
Reply

FreedomFighter88888888
1 day ago

When are gays going to be charged when they march in the nude flashing there genitals?????
O this only applies to Aussies who love Australia,. Victorian police are a F joke. Absolute disgrace.




4 likes 
Reply

FreedomFighter88888888
1 day ago

It’s not about abolishing HATE SPEECH, it’s all about CENSORING TRUTH SPEECH.




1 like 
Reply

theuprising88
1 day ago

LOL NIGRL BRILLIANT JOEL




1 like 
Reply

theuprising88
1 day ago

COPS = ZOGBOTS BLOOD AND HHONOUR 14 WORDS o/




1 like 
Reply

MysteryGhost18
1 day ago

Builder standard in Australia have hit the skids as the free trade agreement between the pajeets and Australia, made it possible to use pajeet ‘qualifications’ in building in Australia. No certification required. Any shit stain can now call themselves a builder!




3 likes 
Reply

jvlake
1 day ago

Tech companies and English cafe/restaurants. This has been my experience with 4/5 Indian tech workers, “Can you do *complicated thing*”, “yes, yes, very experienced at *complicated thing*”… can’t do complicated thing AT ALL and they only hire other Indians.

It’s disheartening watching all these struggling cafes getting purchased by Indians. They pack the staff with other dubiously hired Indians serving up curried Omelette, Fritata with Kasundi, turmeric in everything… It’s the Indian equivalent of the Chinese ‘french’ bakery (yellow pastry, meatless pies full of jelly). The arrogance of assuming our food/tech requires zero effort.




2 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 2 replies

AbbyBear
1 day ago

They will always fail. They are scammers at heart and that won’t hold.




1 like 
Reply

AbbyBear
1 day ago

Blaire has you ALL beat on physique… haha he’s an Aryan prince. I can appreciate the physique of a strong and disciplined gentleman. Nothing wrong with taking motivation from a well balanced man.




0 likes 
Reply

masklophobix
1 day ago

Cops uphold orders, not laws. That’s how its been since the 80s when bureaucrats took over.




4 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply

theuprising88
1 day ago
Replace bureaucrats with JEWS




6 likes 
Reply

ProvingNihil
2 days ago

Police officer’s are pussies, they hide behind a badge and a gun. They wouldn’t confront anyone without those 2 object’s protecting them. We the people should have the right to defend ourselves against police officer’s without facing any legal consequences. Obviously that’ll never happen!




6 likes 
Reply

EnglandAwake
2 days ago

Make a telegram group and organise the campaign. Nick probably has his groypers in a large group chat strategising.




1 like 
Reply

RedYokes
2 days ago

My guess is that Blair remains banned because he has a well known criminal record. That was always Elon’s get out clause, that people who break the law would remain banned. Blair should just make a new account. Blair isn’t Fuentes.




0 likes 
Reply

Learningskin
2 days ago

Thomas Sewage is finally paying the price. love it.




-17 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply

ProvingNihil
2 days ago

Why?




-1 likes 
Reply

Nickdorshimer
2 days ago

“the dick pussy incident” LMAO




0 likes 
Reply

Zauggman
2 days ago

the point made about the homeless is so well spoken. these are our people, and if we want to change the society we must take of our own and do what we can to change policies to lift our people out of poverty. Poverty is one of the weapons they use, immigration and immigrants are tools and implements used against us. the homeless and disaffected whites are the result.




12 likes 
Reply

Ivyrion
2 days ago

This is my favorite morning show. 0/




22 likes 
Reply

Learningskin
2 days ago

Joel- you know nothing about technology and innovation. or Indians’ contribution in the field of sciences. so, STFU and blow Tom!




-18 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 4 replies

volks86
2 days ago

indians are the new globalist slave, the jews transplant you into fake CEO roles all over the world to shit it up. whenever i see an indian in a leadership role i know that company is controlled.

Also you are seriously trying to argue that you pajeets contribute to the field of science? get your people to start washing their hands and not shit in the street THEN i might consider it.




14 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 3 replies

NW88er
2 days ago

They should also stop eating poop. It’s a good first step.




5 likes 
Reply
Learningskin
2 days ago
So Microsoft and Google have arbitrarily chosen Indians as their CEOs ?. no wonder why the whites are being replaced.




0 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 2 replies

volks86
2 days ago

Yes and yes we are. Moron just proved what I said.




5 likes

Learningskin
2 days ago

you retarded piece of bogan shit. look up Sundar Pichai and Satya Ndaella on the net. read up on their background. maybe then you will understand their pedigree.




0 likes

NW88er
2 days ago

Whites invented science. We do not want your garbage genetics in our gene pool. We see what happened to the Aryans that conquered India.

You should respect that we do not want to be crap colored.




7 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply

Learningskin
2 days ago

sure. you invented everything. you ignorant buffoon.




1 like 
Reply
› Show 2 replies

Carnierge
2 days ago

Seethe Sandeep




5 likes 
Reply

AltKuyperian
2 days ago

Crazy that a country of a billion people only sometimes produces someone over 100 IQ




4 likes 
Reply

paceytarzan
2 days ago

Hi lads, the only question I have about Nazism is if the west never declared war on Germany, what would Europe look like realistically? Nazis would beat the commies yes but do you all genuinely think they wouldn’t have ever invaded the west?




0 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 6 replies

AltKuyperian

2 days ago
I would much rather be subject to their control than to suffer through what we’re going through right now. They would not be mutilating our children’s genitals, allowing rampant crime, forcing us to desegregate, etc.

And we’d be speaking German! How awesome!




10 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply

ballsagna
2 days ago

Fair point and I absolutely agree. Tbh, so many Americans were ethnic Germans and even spoke the language… an 1940s change to German-led regime wouldn’t be all that unthinkable. Soooo many of our roads and towns are Dutch and German names. And to state the obvious… our grandparents or great grandparents from that era shared ideals more with Nazi germany than todays state of affairs.




6 likes 
Reply

NW88er
2 days ago

No more brother’s wars. No more White oligarchs sending Whites to die for profit. That cannot be tolerated.

Yes I know about jews, but they couldn’t have done it without White oligarchs who are treasonous to Whites.




6 likes 
Reply

Carnierge
2 days

ago
Invaded and done what? Made us all speak German? Preferable to what we have now. In fact, desirable. They deserved the fruits of Europe through their efforts. If they took our nations and instituted a new hegemony, that would have been their right. Yet look what ((we)) have done to them. Look how they are subjected to demoralisations in every walk of life, in every communal place of interest. Look at our nations and theirs since we “won”. Through the decay of our societies, we will be brought no other option than to admit we were wrong. It’s impossible to ignore, and will be.




4 likes 
Reply

Letwrong
2 days ago

AH loved Brittain and refused to go to war with them for as long as he could




3 likes 
Reply

ballsagna
2 days ago

Are you not familiar with Hitler’s feelings towards the English people and his affection for the British empire and feelings of Anglo-Aryan kinship? His many appeals to peace? The mercy shown at Dunkirk?

The corrupt, bloodthirsty drunkard slob Churchill forced AH’s hand to even return fire on British soil. He didn’t want it. So yes, in your hypothetical, I’d put all my chips on the outcome being: once the war in Europe ended & restitution is settled, etc., Hitler would have no interest in declaring war further Westward.

The only possible scenario I could imagine would be if Bolshevism overran the (largely ethically German) United States & a Nazi-sympathetic American wing developed… in this case id grant that Nazi German would support a revolution.




2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

Joel Davis – Mark Collett vs Greg Johnson – The Ukraine Debate – Oct 17, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Patriotic Weekly Review – with Joel Davis – Apr 27, 2023 – Transcript

Joel Davis – On Australian Nationalism with Matthew Grant – Dec 17, 2022 – Transcript

Joel Davis – The White Australia Policy with Matthew Grant – Jul 27, 2023 – Transcript

Joel Davis – On Activist Politics and White Advocacy – PA Conference Speech – Oct 7, 2023 – Transcript

Slightly Offensive – Debate – Is Diversity Our Strength? – Joel Davis vs Drew Pavlou – Apr 5, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis – Mass Deportations Enthusiasm, Twitter Politics & Activist Persecution – Jun 6, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 25,460

• Total words in post = 30,315
• Total images = 10
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4: Mon, Jun 10, 2024 — Fully proofed transcript. Added SEE ALSO Covers image.

Version 3: Sun, Jun 9, 2024 — Fully proofed transcript to 95/133. Added images. Added Rumble comments. Added See Also links for Joel Davis.

Version 2: Sat, Jun 8, 2024 — Improved formatting. Fully proofed transcript to 60/133 mins.

Version 1: Fri, Jun 7, 2024 — Published post. Transcript quality = 3.5. Includes Odysee comments (207).