Joel Davis: We are live, and I know we are late, and I haven’t even looked at the live chat. There’s actually some glitch on my laptop where I can’t actually see anything in the live chat on Rumble. Sure, everyone is complaining that we’re late. But oh, I guess suck shit you get in your show.

 

Anyway, we’re starting and we’re here. Tom’s sick, so maybe Jacob will be joining us. But Tom is sick, so there’s no Tom.

 

But it’s The Joel and Blair Show, so you should be okay without him. How you doing this evening, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m great. It’s good to. Good to be back.

 

My first line, I’m already stuttering, but I’m awake. I promise I’m awake. I’m awake enough, and I’m excited. I’m excited to get into another week of news and Right-wing perspective or Nazi point of view, if that’s the way you want to look at it. How about you, Joel? How are you feeling?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m feeling pretty good. Feeling quite good, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I hope you’re feeling better than your hair looks.

 

Joel Davis: I kept trying to make this thing that’s sticking up here to stop sticking up, but I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be time for a haircut, bro. Just throwing it out there. You’re still an attractive man, so don’t worry.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it might be time for a haircut, but I don’t know, I’ve got, like, a distinctive look going on. I don’t know if I want to just go back to some, like, normie cut. I like to be different.

 

But anyway, the show this evening, I think we should just get straight into it, because I haven’t actually spoken to you about this, but kind of funnily enough, I think this act, literally is the biggest story in racism globally right now, is this story which builds off the back of, …

 

A lot of people who are on Twitter will know the account at Barry Stanton GBP, and it’s one of the funnier accounts on Twitter.

 

Basically, he had a profile picture of this kind of old British guy. You would imagine Baz down the pub having a pine of Carling. And he had this whole bit where he was like, this racist boomer, but it’s kind of evolved where now he’s just going, like, full, hardcore tirade, basically calling people the n-word and getting away with it and just heaps of anti-pajeet posting, anti-jew posting as well. Pro Hitler posting, pro, you know, British patriot posting. Just a lot of just so much based stuff. But his account is going ridiculously viral. Like, whenever anyone goes on the timeline, you just see heaps of Barry Stanton tweets with insane amounts of likes and views and he’s just become so powerful, it’s ridiculous! Like, he’s just like, dominating Right-wing Twitter, this force.

 

And somehow Twitter banned him from having a profile picture, which I’ve never seen before. So he has no profile picture, but it only made him stronger.

 

Anyway, you see his stuff all over Twitter. I think particularly the anti-anti Indian posting seems to have really been picked up by the algorithm and as a result, now World bank has halted its advertising on Twitter because basically its ads were seen. I’ll read the article here. The World bank has ceased all paid advertising on Elon Musk’s social media platform X, which was formerly Twitter, after a CBS news investigation found promoted advertisements from the organisation showing up under a racist post from account that prolifically posts pro-Nazi and White nationalist content. CBS news found that a verified X account with more than 115,000 followers had posted a racist image alongside a post praising Europe’s colonisation of Africa.

 

Anyway, the post is literally this. It was a picture of some shitty part of London where blacks live and it said, Africans in Europe. And it’s real dirty. And then a picture of this is probably in South Africa.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s worse stuff on X. Why is this a big deal?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just true. It’s like, these are Africans in Europe, these are Europeans in Africa. It’s just true. It’s just two different pictures which are true.

 

But yeah, the truth is racist. As we’ve been saying, our enemies in both ourselves and our enemies agree that the truth is racist. We’re just happy about it and they’re not. That’s really the only distinction.

 

But, yeah, so this is interesting because obviously there’s a lot of pressure that has been piling up upon Twitter to censor the platform. But I’ll be honest, like, of course there’s some big accounts that are kept off, but I think the censorship seems to have relaxed over the last few months. If anything, people are cutting quite loose on the timeline in a way that I haven’t really seen in many, many years. And really hardcore racial stuff is going gangbusters, like the really kind of supremacist or hateful connotation, or look at how disgusting this Indian is. These kinds of posts are going viral and that’s one of the most tame Barry Stanton tweets, to be honest.

 

And it’s just a very interesting paradigm, because for a very long time, the narrative was that we don’t want to be hateful, we don’t want to be supremacist. We want to come across as though we love everyone and we’re just rational and reasonable. And here’s our agreeable arguments as to why people deserve rights, too, or why people should have their own countries as well.

 

Apparently, this was supposed to be the way that we outreach to the masses and the so-called egregious wignat, racist supremacist hardcore content was holding us back. Apparently, it made us look unhinged. It made us look hateful. And this apparently would push away normal people. This wouldn’t be popular.

 

But it seems like those trends are the complete opposite on Twitter right now. It seems like actually, and I posted about this on Telegram last night, it seems like the opposite logic is actually starting to express itself now that we have freedom to post almost anything on Twitter.

 

But, you know, we’re able to go pretty hard on Twitter, unlike we have been able to in many, many years, to the point where you can have 4chan level discourse on Twitter.

 

And also Twitter, I think, removing you used to be able to see every account you click on their likes and you could see all the tweets that they liked. That’s no longer the case that got changed. People criticise that, but in a way, maybe that has inspired a lot of accounts to grow some balls and just like, whatever they want because they’re not afraid of coming across in a negative way because they like something. You can only see who likes your tweet if it’s your tweet, but no one else can see if they liked it.

 

And so as a result of these changes, it seems like, yeah, the really hardcore content is actually doing very, very well on Twitter.

 

And I think it’s illustrating a principle of propaganda, which I think really is the essence of Goebbels philosophy of propaganda, which is that emotion, not reason, is really the essence of good propaganda. You want to grab people in a kind of visceral way, connect to deep seated emotions. It’s not about calmly laying out your case rationally so much in propaganda as presenting your enemy in a way that provokes a strong emotional reaction in the target audience and presenting yourself in a very sympathetic light. Like, another thing that I’m seeing is there’s a lot of pro-White content, which basically is just, it just presents a bunch of sexy White people being sexy.

 

And then there’s like some swastika and some Hitler edited into it or something, and content like that goes crazy! Or just a picture of a hot White chick with an ugly black chick.

 

And it’s like one race, the human race is sarcastically put as the caption or something like this stuff goes wild as well on Twitter. And this is apparently distasteful and morally offensive and all the rest of it.

 

But I think people like morally offensive, distasteful, visceral propaganda.

 

Blair Cottrell: So this is illustrating they like it more than they used to the new dissent is a more extreme or more raw message than it was seven years ago. Like old dissent was:

 

“Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, protect our culture, and we stand against the Left.”

 

That was dissent seven or eight years ago. Dissent now is:

 

“Here’s why Hitler was right. Racism is natural and good, and Leftists aren’t human!”

 

So dissent has evolved. It’s become more radical or just more straightforward. What do you think about that? Is that a good thing? It’s more fun.

 

Joel Davis: Um, well, I think it is because the political situation that we face is a situation that is so desperate in a certain way because our enemies have so much power, so much of the odds are stacked against us. And really the problem is that Whites in general lack confidence. They lack aggression. They lack, yeah, they lack force of will. They’re constantly kind of morally second guessing themselves and feel this social pressure to come across in a certain way.

 

Whereas particularly in an online setting where people can be anonymous and have freedom to explore ideas and opinions that they would feel, that would ostracize them in normal social situations, that frees White people up to then tap into the dark side, tap into what’s been repressed, tap into the places they’re not allowed to go. And there’s a certain kind of allure because racism has been charged with so much social stigma, and then it creates a kind of allure, paradoxically, a kind of, ooh, that’s a little bit fun because it’s precisely because it’s been repressed.

 

Like, a lot of homosexuals, for example, claim that it kind of sucks for them now that everyone accepts gays because it’s not as fun. Used to be more fun when everyone hated gays. Maybe it’s more fun to be racist when everyone hates racists. I don’t know. I don’t really want to equate racism with sodomy, obviously, but there is a certain allure to moral transgression.

 

Moreover, the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is racism truly moral transgression? Is that what it is?

 

Joel Davis: Well it’s all relative. It’s transgressive against the morality of our current society. We could say it’s nothing. Is there an objective moral framework? Would that objective moral framework prohibit racism? I would say no, insofar as it could exist, because racism is completely natural and it’s based in truths like that. Barry Stanton, Meme, “Africans in Europe, Europeans in Africa”, it’s just true. It’s just a statement of fact. When you post a picture of a disgusting Indian and they just look ugly, and then you put them up against a pretty White girl and you say, one race, the human race, sarcastically. It’s appealing to your implicit aesthetic judgements. You know, that one person looks almost like a different species than the other person just looking at the two of them. And it’s saying:

 

“How ridiculous is this notion? One race, the human race?”

 

You can aesthetically feel that there’s something wrong about this anti-racist ideal, and that offends the enemy because they must also make the same aesthetic judgement. They must also be able to feel the same way. It would be incomprehensible!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you ever have this experience where it suddenly becomes clear how desensitized to general racism you are compared with standard Australian citizens? Because we surround ourselves more so often than regular people with autistic racists and National Socialist activists and so forth. And these people are casually racist pretty much in all their conversations. And it starts feeling quite normal. It’s not until you have a conversation with a regular person at work somewhere in society and you see them either laugh or react in a way that’s kind of expressing shock! You kind of stop and acknowledge at that point that, wow, like, what I said wasn’t even that extreme. And this person’s, like, really stunned by it. It really puts into perspective how sensitive the average citizen still is to racism, because I’m not sensitive to it anymore.

 

I mean, I’ve been called a “Nazi” that many times, as have many people in my community.

 

And so the word kind of just loses its bite, but that only, it only loses its bite to me personally, to other people. I wonder, does racism and the phrase Nazi, does it still hold the same taint that it once did? What do you think? Is it becoming more of an accepted thing? Is it becoming more of a normal thing? Because based on my experience with ordinary people, it’s really not like in private conversations behind closed doors, amongst family members. Yeah, people will be racist, but it’s still extremely taboo in Open Society, for obvious reasons, because there’s social and financial consequences. But do you think it’s better now for us than it was in the past? Do you think it’s easier to get people to open up to casual racism than it was before? What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: I think it is, but it depends.

 

And this is why I wanted to talk specifically about the question, because I identified this, actually, last year. I said I think we should focus as a movement more of our propaganda specifically against Indian migration. And I said this would be true, particularly in the Australian context, because Indians are the largest group of migrants that are coming in now. And now they’re the largest non-White group in Australia. But there was other reasons why as well, one being that I think there’s a visceral reaction that people have of disgust towards Indians.

 

And you can see the anti-Indian propaganda, like we look at, like, for example, the propaganda that is racist against blacks. It talks about crime rates, you know, it talks about violence, etcetera. With Indians, it’s not so much what Indians do to us. And we’ll talk a little bit about how Indians are sexual predators or whatever, the whole send bobs in virgin meme. But most of it is kind of just how disgusting are these people? You know, and this, like, scatological association and yeah, just like that. It just plays upon their inherent, revulsive nature that people find detestable about them. And then it triggers all of these really, like, visceral responses where they think about their experiences with Indians and how just displeasurable they are socially, professionally to work a lot of the propaganda, though, is just that they stink, they’re ugly, they smell bad. You know, it’s really basic stuff.

 

But when I talk about Indians in a negative way with normies, whether it be when I’ve been employed at various places or hanging out with normie friends who maybe don’t really know who I am or even if they know who I am, I find that they’re very open to basically being racist against Indians. Where if I spoke about black people or I spoke about jews, there would be. I spoke about black people. They would feel apprehensive and guilty because there’s this connotation of what we enslaved them. And they’ve watched all these Hollywood movies over the years about the black man that just can’t catch a break and has to struggle his way to the top. And there’s been all these inspirational black sports heroes that have been presented to us in different actors that are black guys that we’re supposed to identify with, that have been heroes in all of these Hollywood movies. And black people have a certain charisma. They’re able to solicit sympathy because they have a certain kind of coolness, a certain charisma. They make music that people like. Anyone who’s into sport or culture in some way who’s a normie will probably, like certain, like, famous black people and think that they’re cool. Indians don’t have any of that.

 

And when you talk about jews, obviously that evokes the Holocaust and genocide, but also in a more. With more politicised people, they realise that if you go against the jews, that opens up a whole can of worms. It’s kind of scary, right? Because jews are so powerful. They’ve got all these institutions that will come after you if you speak against them. But Indians don’t have that either. They don’t have all of these pro-Indian institutions set up to attack like, to attack anti-semites or. They don’t have all of the sympathy that has been built up culturally to kind of make you seem like an asshole if you speak negatively about blacks and aren’t sufficiently sympathetic and make, you know, make black sympathetic characters.

 

So as a result of all of this, they’re kind of like the easy sitting duck for racists, because they’ve just come in recently. They don’t really have this whole cultural and institutional apparatus set up to defend them. They don’t have a sympathetic narrative that people have been brainwashed with. They’re not sympathetic as people because they’re personality like. They’re just not cool. And they’re the least cool race.

 

Blair Cottrell: They seem to think they’re pretty cool! They, like, visually, from what I can tell, they think they’re pretty cool! Have you noticed that as well? They say the same.

 

Joel Davis: It makes them objectionable, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. There’s, like, an inability to see themselves from the perspective of others. Like, they’ve got this idea about themselves, and that’s all that matters.

 

My primary grievance concerning Indians, as I’ve raised before, is noise pollution, Indian children running around the streets where I live, barefoot and screaming at midnight on a work night. What’s going on there? Where are the parents? The parents don’t seem to mind. The parents are all inside jabbering on about something or on some loud international phone call at all hours of the morning. Have you noticed that?

 

If you’re watching this, you probably notice this if you go, you know, travel via Uber or ride share service. Look, the three situations where you’re going to be speaking with an Indian person are probably in rideshare, at convenience store slash 711 service stations, or when some government or bank bureaucrat rings you to try to get you to complete some survey or they’re analyzing your life or something like that. Your banking details. That happens sometimes.

 

And first of all, it’s very difficult and frustrating to listen to Indian people try to speak English. They’re very bad at it. Unless they were born and raised here. Their accent is. It’s just an atrocious accent to try to listen to. It’s something that frustrates you and I don’t think there’s any accent that is more frustrating for me personally, especially when you’re dealing with people who are in either position of government. They’re working in management for a bank or even in healthcare, and you can’t properly understand them, but they also can’t properly understand you. What kind of fucking sense does that make? It doesn’t make any sense. It’s ridiculous!

 

But this country is ridiculing itself by allowing a free flow of Indian migrants into the country and then propping them up in positions where they’re causing general strife and frustration because no one can fucking understand what they’re saying.

 

But like I said, it’s not just the accent. The accent is some. They’re always talking. That’s what I was trying to get at. They’re always on the phone. They’ve always got their Airpods in. They’re always talking in rideshare services in public places, if they live near you, they’re always carrying on and making noise. And I honestly think because I’ve got some experience in public protests and from public protesting and being counter-protested by Marxist activists, I learnt the term “noise pollution”. Protesters consciously employ this method to try to drown out the opposing side or just drive away people who aren’t sympathetic to their ideology specifically. They’ll make as much noise as they can. And Indians, probably not consciously, but maybe it’s part of collective instinct. They seem to be doing this, and the result is that people leave. People leave the area, they move away and they avoid them.

 

And I think this is why Indians end up sort of clustering up in various suburbs and taking over certain areas. Residential areas, I think don’t underestimate the power of noise pollution. They may be doing it as part of a collective instinct to drive us away, but I don’t think they need to try very hard to drive the majority of Australian population away. I think people just don’t want to be near them generally, and for various reasons that are, you know, legitimate grievances. It’s not just blind racism:

 

“Oh, we don’t like these people because of the way they look.”

 

Or something like. They just don’t seem to have the same basic manners and way of conducting themselves, which expresses the general politeness and concern for others that we are raised with, probably because they come from a country that has billions in numbers and they’re not really used to showing basic concern and consideration to their fellows.

 

But, yeah, noise pollution, I can’t stand it! Can’t stand the accents. Can’t stand the noise. It’s constant!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s real. And I haven’t worked in it myself, but I’ve had a lot of close friends who have. Who work in it and the stories they tell me because obviously there’s a lot of Indians who work in it and the constant buck passing, lying, like, deceptive nature where. And kind of leaning upon you, expecting you to do all the work the way that they nepotistically aid one another. And I’ve experienced this, too. Working with Indians. They are conniving. They try to do the least amount of work possible. They’re seriously incompetent, they’re dumb, but also lazy.

 

And they also treat you like you’re dumb in the way that they try to scam you and manipulate you.

 

But then, because they group up and can pull this kind of racism card in corporate settings as well, to protect themselves, they’re very difficult to get rid of or deal with. So anyone who has to work with Indians hates it. Women, generally speaking, hate Indians the most. Like I find with women, women are more offended by racism on average, when you express racist opinions.

 

But at the same time, when you talk negatively of Indians, even I’ve experienced, you know, Left-wing women who, when I start saying racist shit about Indians, they just go along with me. They completely drop their whole Left-wing ideology because they’ve had so many negative experiences of creepy Indian men saying sexually explicit things to them or maybe trying to touch them in a weird way or stalk them or look at them with freaky looking eyes and yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What is the Indian mating strategy? Describe it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, if you look at how ugly Indians are.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on. Before you continue, describe the Indian mating strategy. And compare it to our mating strategy in contrast.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. So I’m just starting at this point to illustrate my theory. Indians are so ugly. The women, you know, they’re hairy. They don’t have good figures. They don’t have good. Like, they’re just the most ugly race!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that. Do you think that. Let me butt in quickly. Do you think the general lack of muscle mass and the unappealing physical features are a result of Indians actually being a hybrid race? They aren’t actually a natural human species. They’re the result of a mass intermixture of different races. Do you think that’s what it is?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, definitely! I think that’s definitely the case.

 

But also, if we think about what a race needs to perpetuate itself, like, Whites are equality over quantity race. Right. That’s why we have a mating strategy. That is what they call! Selected in the sense that it’s about high long term investment. We I think in particular, northwest Europeans have the greatest predisposition towards monogamous bonding. We can see this even in the pre. It wasn’t just something that Christianity brought to us or something that, like, monogamy was something that was practiced in even more ancient northwest European societies in a somewhat unique way. A lot of rest of the world had a lot more polygamy for its upper class Mendez as a norm.

 

But anyway, the point is that Indians are so ugly.

 

So if you had to think about how would the sexuality of an Indian have to be tuned in order to want to have sex with Indian women? Like Indian male? Well, the Indian male would have to be made so horny and so desperate that he would find having sex with a disgusting Indian woman alluring, that he would have a passion for it. And obviously, there’s 1.4 billion of them on the planet. So he must have a very intense passion for breeding with the Indian female. So because they’re. Because the race lacks quality. It requires quantity, right?

 

So the Indian has to biologically, by necessity, for the Indian genome to spread itself and conquer the world and take on territory and so on, and has to basically do it through raw biomass, and that biomass multiplies itself through the depraved, horny nature of the Indian male, who has to be basically wanting to rape anything that moves in order to perpetuate that disgusting race in perpetuity.

 

You know if I had the option of, basically becoming some, like, volsel and just dying alone, and having sex with an Indian woman every night, I would choose to be a volsel and die alone because I’m an Aryan. I need to actually have a woman that of quality in order to actually inspire me to want to breed. And that’s because I come from a line of high quality women and high quality men who have those breeding standards, and that produces a high quality European civilisation where we have things like high culture and morality, like social standards and so on, and a culture of honour and respect.

 

The Indian lacks these things. The Indian completely lacks these things because he needs to lack these things. If an Indian started having this kind of standards of a White person, well, then he would become kind of also repulsed by his own people and would no longer perpetuate it. So therefore, I think depravity necessarily is the breeding strategy of such a race.

 

And as you say, it’s a mixed hybrid race. We see this similar tendencies in the Middle Eastern peoples, who are also a mixed hybrid race, where the stories that you get came out of Afghanistan and places like that, where all the child rape and they’re having sex with goats and all this kind of stuff. And this stuff goes on in India as well, I mean, the horror stories that you hear coming out of India about the rape and the depravity of the paedophilia and all the rest of it. You see videos on Twitter of some Indian guy puts on a dress, and then all the Indian men just basically jump on him and rape him because he looks like a woman. They just have, like this insane, sex crazed, frenetic energy.

 

And so, you know, that turns women off. So that also, I think, enables it to be a socially acceptable form or the most socially acceptable form of racism, precisely because women, in many respects, uphold the social paradigm somewhat more than men, because women are more likely to get offended. And when a man gets offended at something that you say, you can have a kind of dispute that could potentially go to blows.

 

And so a weak man, if he gets offended in many social situations at what I say, will choose not to say anything. He’ll wait and say something behind my back because he’s afraid of confronting me, because there’s a potential for physical violence, whereas a woman doesn’t fear that I’m going to beat her up because in our society, we don’t put our hands on women.

 

And so a woman will get offended at what I say and then develops this confidence to be able to express her opinion and express her offence and her emotions, because women are encouraged to express their emotions more than men. There’s no threat of violence, generally speaking, over their head. So as a result, women are more influential over the social paradigm. So a form of racism that appeals to women is therefore going to be a more socially advantageous and selected form of racism.

 

Blair Cottrell: I heard a really interesting remark from one of our colleagues in Melbourne about a week ago, because he grew up in Soviet Union, I think it was a Ukrainian province, and he said at the time where he was born. And afterwards, though, it was a much more. This is pivoting from the point a little bit, but it’s interesting still. He said it was more socialist at that point and less communists. And I kind of understand the distinction he was trying to make there.

 

Basically, what he means is it was less hardline, but what he said was, socialism is actually really good if you’re interested in girls or women generally. And his reason was, in socialist society, everyone makes the same amount of money. So it doesn’t matter if you’re a doctor, doesn’t matter if you’re a taxicab driver. Women basically marry anyone because it doesn’t make a difference who has the money. No one has the money, right, except government officials and a very small percentage of people at the top of the strata. I thought that was interesting. I thought:

 

“Well, yeah, that would be one perk, I suppose.”

 

Because once economic value and wealth is eliminated from the female measurement process, male measurement process, well, what are they going to go for after that? Probably genetics. I mean, genetics are high on the priority list for women. I think for some women, they are as high as wealth, and for some women, not as high as wealth.

 

But that was just an interesting conversation I had with this fella, and I never really considered that as a actual benefit of living in socialist society that some of the more beautiful women would be available to marry because wealth isn’t a thing that they’re actually looking for because it doesn’t exist in the broad strata.

 

Joel Davis: Maybe that’s a good argument for socialism. You know, like the sexy guys have fair, not get, like, out-competed by, like, rich, ugly guys more beautiful, more beautiful selection process, you get more hotties. Unfortunately, socialism seems to have the opposite effect, though. It seems to enable a lot of the dysgenic breeding to keep perpetuating itself in a lot of it depends what kind of socialism. We’ve got. A, obviously, on this show, we advocate for National Socialism, which means we want a kind of robust eugenics program, which we discussed last week on the show somewhat extensively but, yeah, back to this subject of anti-Indian hatred. I think it’s particularly poignant in Australia and Canada, but also in Britain, because they get a lot of Indian immigrants there.

 

But it’s particularly Australia and Canada that seem to really get in New Zealand to an extent that really get inundated with Indians relative to total population size. And as, like, a portion of total immigrants. Like, they get a lot of Indian immigrants in America, but America gets immigrants from so many different places that they’re just a small snapshot. And it also seems like in America, they get the high quality Indians. Like, the Indians they get into America are like H1-B visa* Indians.

 

[* The H-1B is a Visa in the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 101, that allows U.S. employers to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. It is the largest Visa category in the United States in terms of guest worker numbers. A specialty occupation requires the application of specialised knowledge and a Bachelor’s degree or the equivalent of work experience. Wikipedia]

 

In other words, Indians that work in tech or usually like a higher stock, higher IQ portion of their population that makes it into America.

 

And then the lower grade Indians then go to Canada or Australia or something.

 

So Americans don’t seem to fully grasp reasons why Canadians and Australians hate Indians so much, because the Indians that they meet are of a bit of a higher quality.

 

But nevertheless, in Australia and Canada, they are an absolute menace. And they’re coming in with incredible speed and incredible size, particularly in recent years. And Canadians are widely known as basically the nice guys of the White race. Canadians, you know, they’re probably some of the most, least racist Whites in many respects. They’re very wholesome. They’re very chungus.*

 

[* Chungus is a meme featuring a chunky version of the cartoon character Bugs Bunny, typically captioned Big Chungus. It began as gaming joke that spread online as a slang term for anything (adorably) “chunky,” similar to chonky.]

 

But from what I’ve seen coming out of Canadian social media and my friends in Canada, it seems like anti-pigeon racism is rapidly spreading and intensifying in Canadian society, which goes to show how potent the Indian can be as a trigger for racial consciousness. And we’re noticing a similar dynamic here.

 

So for those reasons, I think you kind of want to strike the enemy at their weakest point, right? You know, obviously, we want to teach people about the problems with all other races and the necessity to maintain a White only political order and to take the side of your own race in general. Not just dislike Indians, but you don’t mind Asians or jews or something.

 

Obviously, we reject that. We are racialists. We are ethno-nationalists.

 

But if you can find some form of racism for people to embrace at least one form, now you’re kind of getting somewhere. You know, a lot of people thought that would be the same logic with the anti-muslim thing, but the problem with that is that it can be kind of portrayed as the problem is with their religion, not with the people. So, like:

 

“If they would just convert to Christianity or become atheists or something, it would be fine. Like, our problem isn’t with Middle Eastern people. It’s their religion, it’s their culture. That’s the problem, not the people.”

 

But that’s an expression of the people. You know, there are, you know, Indonesian Muslims that don’t behave the same as Middle Eastern Muslims because they’re Indonesians, even if they have the same religion. And I don’t like the religion of Islam.

 

But the point is that that’s not the fundamental problem.

 

And you can see that, particularly in Britain, with people like Tommy Robinson and so on, who kind of redirect a certain kind of racist instinct into a kind of religious dispute. So with the issue with Indians doesn’t really, because people aren’t. The issue isn’t with Hinduism. The issue is with Indians. You know, then also when you have, like a kind of anti-East Asian form of racism, East Asians are kind of the nicest, most civilised other race from, in most people’s personal experience. And I know that there’s lots of negative experiences that people have with East Asians that we could go into, but a lot of people are positively predisposed towards them.

 

So that’s a kind of a harder target to fixate upon. In Australia, we could talk about the problems with the Chinese because there’s the Chinese state is so big and powerful and has influence over Australia, and people can and get concerned about that.

 

But it’s more of an abstract political problem than an interpersonal problem.

 

So it’s a bit harder than the anti-Indian racism to provoke.

 

And then when it comes to the jewish question, a lot of people don’t really have much experience interpersonally with jews. And the jewish problem is, again, it’s kind of more abstract. It’s more, it’s a little bit, it requires a little bit more discussion to explain it to someone. People have to read and talk and learn to learn about jews, whereas, like Indians, you just have to basically experience an Indian. And most people now have in their everyday life in any kind of, particularly in a major Australian city, but most major Western cities, you will experience them.

 

And so therefore, it’s an easy target.

 

And as I said with blacks before, like that, blacks, you know, they’re easy to kind of get people to understand the problems with, but at the same time, they have a lot of cultural and moral sympathy that they’re able to solicit and a certain charisma.

 

So when we kind of look at all the options for a target, an easy target to fixate upon the Indian and also Indians are spreading all over the world at an incredibly fast rate. They just seem to be multiplying, multiplying, multiplying everywhere, like some kind of virus and infection.

 

So therefore they’re like the perfect target, I think, for racism to blow up and become, in a certain sense, mainstream.

 

Blair Cottrell: And is that the end? Is that the end goal? Is that the end goal? Using the Indians as a means to an end, to mainstream, more racist viewpoints?

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely, yeah. What do you agree with the analysis? Like, do you think it’s a or do you have any counterpoints?

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that came to mind was that when you said Tommy Robinson was diverting, I suppose, what you could describe as the collective instinct for self preservation, which is what racism is essentially, or what it should be anyway. Racism is always associated with something ugly, and in reality, it’s a completely natural thing. And it doesn’t have to be hateful or negative in its expression. That’s what I believe. But diverting that kind of healthy racism into religious disputes, that is to say, convincing people that race isn’t the problem, it’s just religion. We just have a problem with religions.

 

You have to remember that race has an influence over the religion. Like, if a large group, ethnic group, adopts a religion, they’re going to inject some of their own ethnic predispositions into the religious dogma as well. It’s the religion takes on a new form depending on the race that’s adopting it. I have a story about this, actually. I was in jail once with a Lebanese guy named Charlie. I won’t tell you his full name because I’m not a name dropper, but Charlie was a Christian, a Lebanese Christian.

 

However, he was very passionate about his Christianity. And I heard him one night, well, when I was in my cell, because he was in a couple of cells down from where I was, I heard him singing in Lebanese, loudly.

 

And I thought, maybe he wasn’t Christian. Maybe he was just saying that to throw me off, like, maybe he’s a Muslim, right? So I asked him the next morning, I said:

 

“What were you singing last night? Singing the Quran? I thought you were Christian.”

 

And he looked at me, almost offended, and he said:

 

“No, man, I was singing the Catholic chime, like Hail Mary or something, but I was singing it in Lebanese.”

 

And he added:

 

“Like, a melody to it as well.”

 

Which we don’t do. European Christians don’t do that. We don’t sing Hail Mary with a melody aggressively. It’s just like something that we summarize isn’t it, Joel? It’s like, how would you describe the way we express it? We kind of just memorize it and summarize it as a prayer. It’s not a song. And the Muslims, by Muslims, I mean Arabs. The Arabs get really into singing the entire Quran, actually, I think, is a song. The way it’s actually read a song sung by men, that’s the way it’s supposed to be expressed. And they love their singing. The men in Islam, even though Lebanese Charlie was a Christian, he was singing and aggressively singing Catholic prayers in his native language as though he was a Muslim. Right. Other Catholics, other Christians don’t do that.

 

So he had injected or fused his own ethnic disposition with the religion that he had adopted. So, realistically, all Islam is, if you look at it fundamentally, there’s some sort of points in which it deviates from fundamental Christianity somewhat, but all it really is is the Arabs having adopted the same Abrahamic faith and fused it with their own ethnic disposition, which means their own racial, natural way of behaving.

 

So I think it can’t be overstated, can’t be understated, can’t be overstated. I’m not sure if that’s the right way to put it. How much influence a race has over not just religion, but environment itself. Everything flows downstream from race and the natural character that the race facilitates. Possesses. Right? That’s what came to mind while you were explaining what you were explaining.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, that’s definitely true.

 

And, I mean, the fact that the Indians have a religion that was originally invented by Aryans and has a lot of similarities with Germanic Paganism and Norse Paganism and so on, because originally the people groups that these traditions descend from are actually the same.

 

But then looking at basically what Hinduism has become and how distinguished it actually is, it is another demonstration of that it’s because the blood mixed down and it turned into something completely different, reflecting the blood of the current pajit.

 

And the same is true even in Europe. You could look at the Protestant Reformation, as you know, in a certain sense, an expression of Celto Germanic tendencies, the differences between Orthodox Christianity and western forms of Christianity, as well as representing a different kind of ethnic and racial kind of predisposition.

 

But, yeah, I think that’s clearly the case.

 

But I think also on this, while we’re on this subject, I think there’s also, like, another layer here to consider, which is when it comes to, let’s say, our propagandistic focus, a lot of the time, people say:

 

“Well, you shouldn’t be so negative. It shouldn’t be about hating other races or hating other groups. It’s about standing with your own group.”

 

And obviously, fundamentally, that’s what we are motivated by. We are motivated by defending our people, our way of life and the future for our children, our grandchildren and so on. That’s fundamentally what it’s about, that we love our own people, we love our own culture, and we want to see it perpetuate today. I was just thinking about this when I took a walk down to the shop and I live in a pretty White area now, and everyone was White and it was just very pleasant. You know, sometimes in some parts of Australia that are very non-White, when I’m walking down the street, I’m kind of got my eye on people because I don’t really trust all the other faces and it’s a very hostile environment and I feel very kind of dirty. I don’t really like being where I am and I just have, I just do my business and get the hell out of there.

 

Whereas I was actually just enjoying being out in public today just amongst, you know, other White Australians. And women were coming past smiling at me and dudes gave me the kind of nod as they came past a few times. And it was just pleasant and it seems very basic, but it’s an indication of you’re where you belong. You know, you feel comfortable in your own community, you feel safe in your own community. You feel like you are where you belong. And that sense of belonging has deeper implications than just a kind of chungus feeling or something. It indicates that you are actually safe and secure in general. Right, that you have.

 

And that’s why we’re ethno-nationalists. Like, it’s if who ran the country wasn’t important, then it wouldn’t matter, you know how many races come into the country because it wouldn’t be important. But it is important, right?

 

Because if your people aren’t running the country, that means other people are. And if other people are running the country, they’re going to run it for their interests, against your interests.

 

So you need to ensure not just that your people are running the country, by the way, that people loyal to your people are running the country, so that the state, the society and so on is built in such a way that it basically reflects your interests and the interests of your family and your community. So that sense of belonging pertains to this kind of basic human necessity. The man is a social animal. Man is on an island. You can’t express your total freedom as an individual. You can’t achieve your potential as a human being. You can’t flourish as a human being without a community and a society and a nation and a state that reflects your identity and reflects who you are. You just simply can’t. You’re basically an alien, an imposter in someone else’s community, someone else’s society, otherwise. And so many of your options are foreclosed.

 

But, yeah, this point is quite abstract. You know, and Hitler and Goebbels talked about this a lot that when you engage in propaganda, you don’t want to be too abstract, you don’t want to be too highfalutin. You immediately lose a lot of people. You want to have simple messaging that gives people a simple target to hate, that focuses negative emotional energy on that target, and galvanises people around that basically simple narrative. These are the people. This is the problem. And then present some kind of alternative or solution or good guy in the drama that is confronting the problem. And that’s the most effective propaganda.

 

But even still, you don’t even necessarily need that whole good guy narrative to have effective propaganda. You can just have a really good demonisation of a particular enemy, and you’re already halfway there.

 

And so, yeah, it might seem distasteful or unChristian or immoral to some people, but this is just simply how the human psyche works. You need to identify a target to hate, and you need to focus hate, revulsion, disgust on that target. That’s just how the human psyche works. There needs to be this threat that needs to be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s being done to you. It’s what’s being done to us. They’re doing it to us. Think about it in the reverse, and look how effective it’s been. You can die happy, too. When you were referring to that sense of belonging and having a government, a leadership administration, which, you know, is administering the country for the purposes of keeping you relatively safe and ensuring that people get stronger and healthier and also protected from external threats, you can die happy if, you know, that’s happening. You can die happy. I could die happy. I said this to a friend the other day. I said I could die happy if I knew my family was relatively safe and my extended community. Other Australians were getting stronger and more beautiful generally. We were getting smarter, stronger, better. If I could see genetic improvements in my extended community, I could die happy. Couldn’t you?

 

You know, it’s kind of the ultimate meaning of life, when you think about it. I mean, none of us truly understand why we’re here or whether anything happens after death. We’re all not really sure. We only have theories. All we can say for sure is that people who die seldom report back. We don’t hear from them. So it’s reasonable to assume that whatever happens after death is not connected to this realm now.

 

And so we’re nothing in complete understanding. We don’t have a complete understanding of why we’re here.

 

But the most basic meaning that I can identify is improving the species. It’s a physical realm. It’s a physical plane. Everything is material here, except whatever it is that’s spurring us on and making us think the way we do. But I’ve said it before, and it’s actually paraphrasing Mein Kampf. Every defeat that your community suffers, our community suffers, every frustration, every failure. It’s only a setback in the grand scheme of things. So long as we protect our race, our racial. Our racial lineage needs to be protected so that we can, as they say, live to fight another day. Once your race is destroyed, you never get it back.

 

So that is the greatest meaning to life in this world, I think, is to protect and advance, develop, that is to say, improve our racial stock. If we lose it, we don’t get it back. We can lose a war. As long as the race stays, we’re fine. We can suffer all this mass immigration. As long as we protect ourselves as a race, we’ll be fine in the long run because we can fight back later. Like, we just have to protect the race while we’re under siege. Everything can be turned into a victory later. So long as the race is kept pure, as pure as possible. And, yeah, that’s where I find the most meaning in this realm. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Definitely! I mean, race is the form of life that you are. And if we go all the way back to the creation myth at the beginning of the Bible when God finished creating the world, he saw it and he said it was good. You know, nature is beautiful. The hand of God has created this incredible vast. You know, when you think about how big spaces. I know the flat Earthers are going to freak out at me, but you think about how vast spaces and the incredible images that you have of faraway galaxies and so on, it truly is incredible that existence is what it is.

 

I mean, just the fact that anything exists at all is a miracle when you really think about it. But the incredible majesty of its expanse and the intricacy as well. Just how complex everything is when you really break it down scientifically and go in the macro or the micro, it really is incredible!

 

And then when we look around, though, of all the known world, really, the human is still, in my opinion, the most interesting thing that exists that I’m aware of in the material realm. And then within the human, the Aryan race is the most interesting type of human that exists. I think that hands down, I mean, our story is the most interesting story. Our achievements are the most incredible achievements. We are the most interesting existentially, you know, from a romantic perspective and of course I’m biased, but nevertheless, that’s how I say we’re the most beautiful to look at. I think we’re the most. We have the most geniuses.

 

Blair Cottrell: Greatest, also greatest ability to imagine. We have the greatest ability to imagine which our most deadliest enemy, our most deadly enemy. They’ve worked that out and they’ve discovered how to use it against us. Because many of us are imagining a reality which is not real. The reality of human equality. You see, previously, our imagination has worked to our advantage because it’s produced great creativity and higher level of civilisation.

 

But now it’s being used against us, I think.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but nevertheless, the point is that the particular form of life that we are is something so precious. And you are kind of tasked. You’ve been given this form of life to embody it as a part of it. You’ve kind of been tasked with stewardship by God over the form of life that you are to, basically achieve its full potential. And that full potential you can realise somewhat in your own life, but it’s ultimately realised through the intergenerational development of the race, of the bloodline that you are participating in.

 

And that’s why people are so self sacrificial when it comes to their own children. Because there’s this innate sense within us that we are part of this grander process than just us as individuals. That we transcend the limitations of our individuality through the blood. And when you, a nation, is a community of blood, we all have the same ancestors. And if we stay together on a long enough timeline, our blood will probably mix again down the, down the ages.

 

And so we’re one big family kind of fighting in this kind of against nature in a certain sense, as a part of nature, to overcome its challenges and evolve and progress and develop. And it’s a beautiful thing. It really is. It’s an absolute enamours me. It gives me so much meaning in my life.

 

And so, to me, this is really what it’s all about. And the hatred that you feel to bring it back to the subject matter towards the pajeet, is what the pajeet represents, is when all that falls apart, when an Aryan people set up a civilisation and the caste system collapses and all their blood gets mixed with these inferior races, and you get this racial chaos and descent into depravity and lower stock, lower breeding, and you can see that what can come of the human race if you lose, because what it means to be Aryan, the word Aryan, it means honourable. It means noble when the blood loses its honour, when it loses its nobility, and becomes mixed down with the lower races, with the lower human types. And we see where culture goes. We see what becomes of a people in that state. And it’s disgusting! It’s literally disgusting! And that disgust that you feel, that revulsion, that’s what Nietzsche called the “pathos of distance”. That’s your inner nobility recognizing that’s a form of life I don’t want to become. I don’t want my children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and so on becoming that is horrifying!

 

And so we need to maintain distance from that. We need to separate ourselves from that so that we don’t become that. Because if we get flooded with all of these jeets and they take over everything, and we get sectioned off and we’ll get down bred, and we’ll all be turned into pajeets on a long enough timeline, if the current political paradigm is allowed to perpetuate itself, that’s what it is. It’s global, basically. Global. India is the jewish, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you imagine if God came back? You imagine if God was just off doing something, or if you’re a Christian, the second coming of Christ Jesus comes back and the whole planet is just Indians, what would his reaction be? He’d be like:

 

“Oh, I was wrong. I was wrong. They can’t be saved. They can’t be saved. Burn it. Burn it all. Brimstone. Fire and brimstone. Let’s get rid of it.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s already horrifying enough to realise that the there’s more Indians in the world than White people already in total.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are a global minority. Whites are a global minority, and a pretty disadvantaged and oppressed one, considering that we’re the only ethnic group on the planet that’s not really morally or socially permitted to recognise itself as an ethnic group.

 

But you mentioned nature like that. We’re fighting against nature. I think you would agree that I see nature as, like, a necessary opponent. Like, it gives you the necessary trials in order to keep you strong genetically and physically in your own life. But, it’s a good opponent because it’s not actually trying to genocide you, like our other opponents. Nature’s not trying to kill off our entire race. Like, consciously. Nature’s more of an unconscious force of trials that tests you and makes sure you’re worthy of being here.

 

So that’s my preferred opponent. And I feel I have a strong connection and connection with an understanding of nature. I do really appreciate. The natural world can be quite, quite cruel. Nature can be the ultimate fascist. But I appreciate it for that reason.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think in many ways, this is what the jew is almost like this manifestation of nature as a kind of test of the Aryan that we have to overcome. Like, in order to overcome.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a pretty rough test. It’s a high level test. That one’s like the final boss, maybe.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s like a woman is like, if a woman is of high quality, she will kind of test men to see can they pass her test to become worthy of breeding. Like, are they able to meet all of these criteria that makes her feel. Yeah, they do that.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, you conflate the existence of the jewish people with that, actually, because that’s what Hitler suggests in Mein Kampf, and he suggests that that’s why they’re considered the chosen people, because they were chosen by God to test everybody else.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, definitely! There seemed to be a certain dynamic like, that going on, and jews are kind of like an anti-race. They’re not really a race because they’re mixed with so many other races. They don’t actually have any pure identity. They’re this hodgepodge.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that true? Because there’s two separate types of jews. I know, Sephardic and Ashkenazi. And I do recognise ethnic traits in the Ashkenazi jews, which are the ones presiding primarily in Europe or previously have lived in Europe and hailed from European states, nations. Well, not nations, countries. They’re not of the European stock. Not necessarily, but they are kind of blended in, as you suggested. But recognise ethnic qualities as you probably can too. But what you’re suggesting is there’s no example of an actually pure jewish person. Is that what you mean?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, it depends on, like, what theories you have about the origin of the hebrew peoples. I don’t really want to get into that, but the genetic fact or not in this stream, there’ll be a topic for another day, because that’s the whole show on itself. But the jew in his current manifestation the Ashkenazi jew, is literally half European, half semitic, or half Aryan half semitic. In, like, genetic modeling, you can just see it kind of plot between Levantine and southern European populations in particular. But and they look like that as well.

 

So, yeah, the jew is not a pure type.

 

And also, look at the history of Israel. It’s constantly getting conquered by all these surrounding empires, and it’s constantly changes in who’s running it, and brutal conquests by the Babylonians and the Assyrians.

 

And then the Greeks take it over, the Persians are running it at one point, the Romans are in charge. In the meantime, they mix with surrounding groups as well.

 

So, yeah, it’s the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re much the same. We’re much the same. I mean, I’m not pure. I’m not a pure expression of an Aryan or northern European. I mean, I’m a result of intermixture to a certain extent. But within the European nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s within the European nations. Yeah.

 

So that’s a bit. That’s a bit different. Like, within the like, there’s also gradations within the race. Like, we used to have more distinct castes, and now the casts have blended through interbreeding because caste specific breeding hasn’t occurred. And that’s one of the tasks that we will have once we basically regain political power, is to try and breed the caste back into distinction from one another through identifying who has more traits, like, what predominant caste traits people have, and then bringing them together.

 

And then eventually the blood will then repurify into, like, more specific castes.

 

But, yeah, we’re all kind of mixed in that respect. And the caste system itself, there were, like, different ancestral populations that are all European, that mixed in different ratios now to constitute the distinctions between different European populations.

 

But yeah, that’s at least within one race.

 

Whereas the jews are then mixed across, like, different racial groups, and the semitic people themselves are racially mixed people. They aren’t really a pure race either. That whole Middle Eastern to subcontinent area is just like a genetic quagmire of all these different groups mixed together.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what do you think, Joel, of the theory that we were the original jews? By we, I mean, sort of like light featured, light hair, blonde eyes. Sorry, blonde hair, blue eyes. People from northern Europe, we were the original jews, and our identity was stolen from us. And by a khazarian empire, I think they called it. Have you seen all that stuff? What do you think about that?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think the Khazarian, the Khazarian theory I’m not well versed upon, but that I’m not so sure about.

 

But the idea that the original Israelites or Hebrews were Aryan and that over time they became mixed bread I think, has a lot going for it. That’s a very interesting theory, something that I’m still researching because it’s very difficult as well. When you go back before the if you go back too many you go back to like 3,000 years ago, it’s hard to find evidence for a lot of things so you’re really trying to piece together fragments.

 

And obviously this is politically disputed as well. And the jews or the modern day state of Israel wants to perpetuate a certain narrative and myth about history and they’re actually in control of a lot of the archaeological sites and so on.

 

So it’s very complicated. But the long and short of it is, yeah, I do think that there is some evidence that the original Hebrews had more White traits, you know, some reports, not necessarily blonde, but like ginger hair and lighter eyes and so on, obviously.

 

And then they were being conquered by Babylonians and mixed with the Edomites after the Maccabean revolt and so on and so then they could have gained traits from the surrounding semitic peoples over time and became a kind of hybrid semitic race over time.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I wonder if there’s any value in learning Hebrew. Would you learn Hebrew?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, I got high priority.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it even possible? Would they have they got like the actual Hebrew as a protected language? Perhaps certain people.

 

And then the one that they allow other people to learn is like a bastardized.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The modern day so-called Hebrew language that they have in modern day Israel is actually Aramaic, which is a completely different language and has a completely different script.

 

If you look at the records of like the ancient original Hebrew language prior to in the oldest kind of records that we have, it actually looks a lot like Greek or some European script. I think obviously it derives from the Phoenician language, so that’s probably why.

 

But yeah, that’s quite interesting, all of that stuff.

 

But it’s a bit of a deviation, I feel like going down that trajectory. I mean, unless you really want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all right, we can keep it local. I’ve just personally been thinking about learning another language. Not necessarily because I want to know the language. As much as I want to enhance my capacity for remembering and also expressing myself, I think the more words you know, too, that cover a broad range of different meanings. And that’s especially possible if you’re going to know multiple languages. You can think better, you can process information better, because you have more words to understand things, to use to understand things.

 

And I think I’ve really wasted time by not learning another language up until this point in my life. I’m just not really sure how to go about it. I know that there’s these phone applications now, and you can spend, 200 minutes a day doing something and you get points and all that sort of stuff, but I’m not really sure if that would effectively teach me a language. I could give it a go. I just don’t want to dump much time into something that’s not going to produce the result that I want. And the result that I want, as I explained, is I want to know more words in another language as well, preferably a language which has more words than English words, and maybe even a language that with a different Alphabet to English.

 

So I don’t get confused. I’d like to learn an entirely new, entirely new Alphabet, which was why I was considering Hebrew. Greek might also be interesting. I think Greek would be particularly challenging, actually.

 

But, yeah, I’m fascinated by language.

 

Joel Davis: I would say that if you want to learn another language, you would want to pick a language where there’s something written in that language that you want to read in the original.

 

And so then you have an actual task that’s motivating you and contextualizing the process rather than learning it just for the sake of it.

 

So if you wanted to learn ancient Greek because you wanted to read Plato in the original Greek and the Septuagint or something, you wanted to read, like, texts written in ancient Greek and understand, be able to translate them into English yourself for your own edification or for me, when I was reading a lot of German and French philosophy, I started picking up a lot of German and French terms.

 

And I thought about it would be really good to learn German completely properly and then read German philosophy in the original German. That would be really interesting.

 

But then also you would want, if you want to learn how to speak it well, you’d want people in your life that speak that language to talk to you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Otherwise, how do you know, exactly, like, how do you know, that you’re pronouncing a word correctly? I mean, I even do that in English. I pronounce words incorrectly all the time because I’ve been reading and learning them. But people don’t use those words in conversation in present day society, and so I’m mispronouncing English all the time.

 

Of course I’m going to do that to a much greater extent if I’m learning a new language. And I don’t know anyone who’s also speaking that language.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be a lot easier as well, if you lived in a country where everyone speaks that language. Like, you’d be able to learn German a lot faster if you lived in Germany than if you’re in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to. You have to. It’s like if you have to your friend just got shot in the leg, and you’ve got to get in a manual car and drive him to a hospital, but you don’t know how to drive manual. You kind of have to drive manual. And so by the time you get to the hospital, you learnt how to drive manual. It’s kind of like that living in a foreign country where you have to learn a language in order to gain access to basic goods and services. Right.

 

And on the subject of goods and services, I’m really exhausted by the incompetence of the basic person.

 

I mean, I won’t go through all the details, but I’m talking about hairdressers, fast food restaurants, you know, supermarket employees. Has anyone else noticed how bad everyone is at just performing basic jobs, resulting in exchange of services like the Internet and social media, whatever it is, has just destroyed people’s communicative capacity? People are terrible at their jobs. They’re terrible at speaking to you and I had a really bad day today. Well, the first half of the day, as a result of just communication breakdowns and me literally having to explain to people in certain industries how to do their job so they could produce a certain service or product? For me, it’s just exhausting. Mandy, I feel like.

 

I don’t know if you feel the same, Joel. Do you feel like you produce your own energy, but almost no one else in society does? They just take it from you. It’s like some people take energy, and some people produce energy, and I feel like I don’t take and I don’t want to take anyone else’s energy because I’m producing plenty of my own. But I get really tired. I get exhausted when I’m out of my home for too long because people are just draining me. It’s just general incompetence. I suppose that’s my complaint with people in society. Is anyone else noticing this? Let me know in the comments, because I need to feel like someone’s backing me up here.

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely! I experienced the same thing. I think it’s partly due to the fact that mass immigration, White people just have higher standards.

 

And even though a lot of the time you deal with White people in these jobs, they’re working in an environment that has now become mixed.

 

And as a result of that, like, standards in general drop and competency in general with training people and across the board, everything just kind of falls. The less White people. As soon as you like. Yeah. Dilute a workplace with non-Whites.

 

Also, I think for low income roles, it’s like, I think people struggle to really get motivated for $25 an hour or something to really care, because that’s worth nothing these days. Like, you really, you’re barely able to survive if you’re working a minimum wage job, so why would you be putting your heart and soul into its not a very dignified existence.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s fair enough, though.

 

But I’m talking about hairdressers. I went into a barber because I’ve been trimming my facial hair at home. But the trimmers, whatever they’re called, that I’ve been using, they’ve been giving me rash. So I thought I’ll throw them out and get some new ones later, but for now, I’ll just go to a barber and get my beard trims. And it was such an ordeal, man. It was such a pain in the fucking arse just to get my beard trimmed. I had to wait almost an hour.

 

And then when I finally did get into one of the barbers chairs, I just got some woman hairdresser working in a barbershop who clearly had never actually cut facial hair before and wasn’t confident to do it, but gave it a crack nonetheless. And I won’t go into all the details, but it was just, it was very frustrating. And I’m thinking to myself, and I tried, like, two different barbers as well, but at the other one, there was only one person working, and there was just too many people waiting there. I would have been there for over an hour.

 

And this is the first thing in the morning, too. Like, before I started work, I thought, you know, I’ll get into a barber quickly, it won’t take too long, and then I’ll be able to go to work. But I go to the local barber, I suppose this is population density problem or an illustration of that? It’s just about to open. Two minutes away from opening and there’s like almost ten people waiting at the front. They’ve all got the same idea I’ve got. I suppose they just want to get in there before their day starts. But it never used to be this way. It never used to be this way. Not even five years ago.

 

Everyone’s running away, Joel, because all these people I’m talking about, they’re White people waiting at the front of the barber in my area. They’re White. All the people that are sort of clustering up in this suburb, majority of them are White, but they didn’t live here before. They used to live in other areas which are now either unaffordable or completely inundated with migrants.

 

And so they’ve run down to the southeast where I live because it’s one of the last livable areas that’s still relatively Australian.

 

And I’m really feeling it. I got to say, I’m really feeling the absurd population density, the sudden increase. It’s kind of hit industry too.

 

I saw an interesting little propaganda video that I shared on my Telegram. You can find it on my main Telegram channel.

 

And I’m really glad I found the channel that it’s from, the channel I shared it from because it’s got all of these historical propaganda posters from various different wars and episodes in countries around the world throughout history.

 

And I’m really interested not just in language but in propaganda depictions, old and new. And in this particular video, I think it was produced by the National Party in New Zealand in 1975, if I remember my details correctly.

 

Basically New Zealand at that point was facing the same problems Melbourne is now. Actually, it’s much worse because the numbers are much worse in our situation. Numbers of immigrants. But the amount of immigrants coming in, there’s too many at once. There’s not enough housing.

 

And so the price of housing has soared to egregiously high levels. And it goes through the consequences of what happens after that. There ends up not being enough schools or hospitals as well. And pretty soon there’s not enough jobs. Then crime goes through the roof, there’s hostility between the people, there’s discontent and you basically end up with a crisis. And the way that the New Zealand government solved that crisis was moving everyone into the city in cheap little apartments. And now 90% of New Zealand’s population, or even more than that, I think it’s like 93% lives in the city in the major city in the northern part, I think that is.

 

And so I suppose down here in Melbourne they might try to do the same thing.

 

But I think they’ll probably set up more little satellite cities around Melbourne. They may try to make one out of Frankston. I know that basically every traditional residential block in the southeast where I live is now subdivided. If it can be subdivided, it will be subdivided and units will be built on it. So what previously was one family home is now between three and five small one bedroom or two bedroom apartments, like, very tight built close together. And I suppose that’s the solution that the state’s going to come up with in our case.

 

But, yeah, I’m actually at a loss to remember the point that I began with but if you want to watch that video, watch that video on my Telegram and follow the channel, too, I’ll go to it now. The channel is on Telegram. Propaganda posters. It’s literally called propaganda posters. He’s got a Reddit channel as well.

 

But, yeah, I’m really glad I found it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So a couple other stories I guess we should probably cover while we’re on here, because we’re supposed to cover the news. The refugee encampment that we counter-protested a couple weeks ago. Immigrant protesters clash with police in Melbourne as they block street, demanding permanent visas. So it’s funny. They’re still there. They’re still messing around, and now they’re basically unruly fighting with police. And this comes after a somewhat humourous story, in my opinion, of one of these pajeets, or I say jeet, but he’s a Tamil, meaning he’s from Sri Lanka. He self immolated. He burnt himself alive in Noble Park at the skate park or something because he couldn’t get a visa. Two weeks of protesting didn’t get his visa, and so he burnt himself alive. And they’re making this big deal out of it. Oh, this poor man, he was killed by the racist Labor government because they won’t give him a visa. I mean, and some people made the humourous remarks of you’d rather burn yourself alive than go back to your own country and so on. It’s quite humourous.

 

But, yeah, the that happened.

 

So that’s kind of energized all the communists and shit! And now they’re clashing with police.

 

So anyway, basically, they all just need to be deported. I mean, as we were correct in saying, like, that’s the easy result or the easy kind of response to this problem. These people are showing up. They’re saying Australia doesn’t exist, that the country was stolen. They don’t respect Australia as having any legitimacy and they feel entitled to live here. And now they’re disrespecting law enforcement.

 

And of course they still have the female cops down there that they had.

 

So the female cops don’t do anything. Imagine if we were out in front of a government department counter-protesting. They’d send down the riot squad, and if we didn’t leave within an hour, that’s like pepper spraying us and trying to like, get the riot shields out and start like bashing us or something. But they tolerate these people blocking off street, a street for two weeks, just camping on the side of the road. I think that’s actually legal to just decide, I’m just going to start living on the side of this road here because I feel like it.

 

Nevertheless, that’s what they’re doing. And, yeah, it’s just kind of its just kind of quite funny.

 

And I think bad optics. I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere with what they’re achieving or what they’re trying to achieve. All they’ve done is just piss a bunch of people off in the country, in the community, giving us a good opportunity to inject our propaganda. Made themselves look unsympathetic and more of the same. What do you think? Do you think it’s a bad look for him punching on with the cops?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it always is for the purposes of mass appeal.

 

There’s no reason for things to get to that extent as well, I mean, if you’re punching on with police officers, you have either failed to consider all of your other options or all of your other options have failed, which is unlikely. There’s plenty of other options and opportunities for getting the result that you want at a public protest without fighting with police. I know sometimes the police advance on you and you’ve got to do what you got to do to protect yourself, but it’s always a bad look.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t think the police are attacking these guys either. The police have been very giving them a very soft touch. I think that they’re just chimping out, basically. Um, just shows. Goes to show even more their entitlement.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is there any video, is there any video footage of the incident or.

 

Joel Davis: Um. I think there is, but I already got out of it. I just want to kind of keep going on this because this story got. Adds into it. This is from Canada. So in Canada, they’ve got protests as well, but they’re not even claiming to be refugees. They’re literally student on student visas. Because they got bad grades, apparently. Like, it’s because of racism, not because they didn’t pass the tests.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And they’re demanding permanent residency and they’re claiming that Canada is stolen land. And that, again, same thing they do here. They claim that Canada is in a legitimate country, and therefore they, Indians should be entitled to be given university degrees despite failing the exams, and they should be able to live there as long as they want.

 

Blair Cottrell: But if Canada, if it’s not a legitimate country, then why do they want to be legitimately recognised and naturalised by that country? It’s like fucking. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. So it’s stolen land and it’s not a real nation, but you want to be considered a part of and citizen of that nation at the same time. And if they say no, they’re racist. The fuck are they talking about?

 

Joel Davis: Students? Like, if you’re there as a student, so then you finish a degree to go home. Like, they expect that they just get to stay forever. But that’s not the terms of the visa. They weren’t invited in to live there forever. They were brought in. They allowed them in to go to university.

 

But you can see that they don’t actually. They’re not even passing the exams. They don’t even really care about the education. They’re just using that as a way to immigrate. And I saw that actually, the Left-wing government in Canada, because they have an election coming up, they just vowed to cancel 70,000 student visas or something and deport a bunch of Indians. And that’s obviously like a ploy to try and win votes for the next election.

 

So that’s interesting to see that the public opinion has shifted. So much of the Left-wing government is doing that, and the Left-wing government here seems to be trying to present itself in that way, too. They’re claiming that they’re going to clean up the student visa program, but if you look at the fine details, they’re not. It’s just like they’re nothing. They’ve done this a few times now where they’ve claimed to be reducing immigration or they’ve claimed to be reducing student visas, but then you look at the actual details of the policy, and it’s actually a nothing. It’s just like a way of changing the presentation of the numbers. So it seems like that’s what they’re doing, but actually the numbers stay the same. So there seems to be a recognition in both here and in Canada that this is wildly unpopular, but the people recognise that it’s contributing to the housing crisis and people are just fucking sick of pajeets. Ultimately, they might not say that explicitly, although increasingly they are more.

 

So it’s interesting to see that, yeah, that’s the kind of where the political winds are right now.

 

And there’s also this article that I wanted to discuss. I shared this. Let me pull this up. Australians increasingly care more about reducing immigration and less about climate change than two years ago. I definitely feel this, like no one is really talking about climate change anymore. Thank God, because it’s really a forced issue. I’m pretty sceptical that climate change is like, the carbon emissions are really that significant in the grand scheme of things. And it does seem contrived for political purposes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I had an old lady just approach me at a bus stop last time, or not the last time, probably about six months ago when I was up in Gold Coast. Maybe it wasn’t that long ago, I can’t remember, but some old lady just walked up to me and started talking to me about climate change and our responsibility in reversing it. And I asked her, where did you read this? Where’d you get this information from? And she said:

 

“Oh, the Guardian.”

 

And I said:

 

“Right.”

 

So, yeah, bless her heart. So some people are still spelled by it, but I definitely feel that’s not as popular as it once was.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, obviously a lot of people, it’s probably like 50-50. Like 50% of people maybe believe in it, 50% don’t, something like that. But whether you believe in it or don’t believe in it, reducing immigration would be good for climate change if you do believe in it, right? Like, if climate change is real, then you would want to stop importing people into the first world from the third world because they’ve done studies on this. When someone moves from the third world into the first world, their carbon emissions go up four or five times per capita. So every jeet that comes in is you’re quintupling their carbon footprint.

 

So if you really care about climate change, you should want to deport all the jeets back to India and really like the most egregious countries in the world for building new coal plants and increasing their carbon emissions and so on, is actually India and China and other non-Western countries. Western countries are the only ones doing anything about it. White people seem to be the only people that actually care about climate change.

 

So if you really think that this is real, the solution would be sending all the non-Whites back and then trying to de industrialise non-White countries as much as possible to reduce their carbon footprint.

 

So we should stop giving foreign aid to Africa, try and reduce the African population. We should try and like, put sanctions on India until they dismantle all of their coal power industry, basically, and power stations and shit like that!

 

And so if you really believe in climate change, I’ve got solutions, but they’re racist.

 

Blair Cottrell: But you’re being. Fixing it, you’re being too sensible. All we have to focus on is fighting racism and ending White supremacy. It all comes down to that. Joel Davis.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what’s funny. Like, I’m quite happy to just pretend climate change is real if you want, if you really want to solve it, because it’d be quite simple. Like, we could just, in Australia, we could just build a bunch of nuclear power stations. There’s no carbon emissions. We have more. The second largest amount of uranium deposits in the world would be carbon neutral in. You know, once we build them, we’ll be sweet.

 

But in the meantime, we should just send all the non-Whites back and do what I said. And I don’t think that a place like India or Pakistan would actually, or some of these countries would actually be able to recover from global sanctions and being forced to get off coal power. And we should stop selling alcohol to them, by the way, which we do. So we could really just shit can their economies. It would be best for the global environment if we just destroyed the non-developed economy, allowing more economies to develop because more development means more electricity gets used, more demand for electricity and more environmental degradation. So honestly the best thing for the environment is global eugenics, basically. It really is.

 

But anyway, Australians care less about climate change, which I think is good because it’s kind of a yeah, it’s an issue that is kind of basically, oh, we need to build more wind farms and all of this kind of nonsense! Like, they don’t want to actually solve the problem, which is if it really does exist, it would be implementing nuclear power. They come up with like some bullshit solution that they know will piss off the boomers. So then the boomers then have a good reason to vote for the Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party can, instead of talking about immigration or anything of actual consequence. And the same goes for all the other Right-wing parties. They can go on about climate change and they can have this like, stupid argument between the Left-wingers and the Right-wingers about climate change.

 

And no one’s talking about anything actually important but the fact that Australia is not fucking Australia anymore because it’s full of brown people and they’re degrading and debasing the White founding stock of this country. And look at the crime rate of all these Africans and Pacific islanders and Middle Easterners that they’re bringing in. What are we going to do about that? So I’m glad that it’s off the menu so that we can talk about real issues and immigration surging in people’s concerns.

 

So, yeah, basically people still care about things like healthcare and the economy and shit like that! But the key issue that is rising in concern is immigration. It’s gone up by 17.6% in two years. People that report, they’re concerned about it, about immigration.

 

So that shows that our kind of politics is in the ascendancy. Our concerns are in the ascendancy.

 

And obviously that’s a good thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! It’s only a matter of time, isn’t it? How long can you ignore, like, a million Indians moving in around you? You can’t really ignore it. It was always going to come to the forefront of a major issue, immigration, that is. And I suppose if the Labor Party have any sense or semblance of sense left, then they’ll probably try to incorporate some promise to stop or lower immigration.

 

But as history shows in Australian politics, not only do Australian politicians not keep their promises, they often do the opposite of what they promise they’re going to do.

 

So the Labor Party bureaucrats, they don’t even need to actually hold to their promise. If they say they’re going to reduce immigration, they just have to say they’re going to do it and then not do it. Kind of like the Liberal Party, they do that as well. It’s almost like they’re the same entity, isn’t it? It’s almost like there’s not a lot of difference between them. Like a false choice.

 

I mean, I’m being a little bit conspiratorial now. Wouldn’t want to get my bank account closed for hate speech.

 

But, yeah, it’s almost like the same people are responsible for lobbying the Liberal and Labour parties. Imagine that. That’d be crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, that’s the case. The property lobby, the business lobby, the various industries, the finance lobby, these are the main contributors to both parties. And they all want more immigration. That’s the consensus. And Bob Hawke, actually, former prime minister from the eighties, is quoted basically admitting that there is a conspiracy between the coalition and the Labor Party to avoid debating immigration. Uh, because they know immigration is so unpopular with the people that if it’s turned into a debate, it will force both sides to make concessions and cut immigration in order to maintain popularity. There’d be like a game theory runoff where if one side attacked the other’s immigration policy, they’d have to respond to regain popularity and they’d end up both being forced to start having a One Nation style immigration policy, which would actually be more popular.

 

People don’t like immigration. We’ve gone through the polls on the show many times. The vast majority of Australians don’t think we need any more people. They don’t think that we need to bring in immigrants. They don’t want. They want immigration cut.

 

So, yeah, immigration is not popular and they know it, so that’s why they don’t debate it. Or they’ll make the debate about something like illegal immigrants, like boat people, or they’ll make it about these little side issues sometimes, but that’s the full extent of it. The other, one other big story this week was that Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, he got sucked. He got, like sucked into going to France to meet some Instagram ho.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if that’s the truth!

 

Joel Davis: That is them out together?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, I don’t know if that’s. There’s different rumours. Like, the first rumour that spread about was that he’d been spending at least a few weeks with a girl from Instagram. And that girl had been posting selfies with him, including geolocations to her Instagram channel. And they’d been traveling to various different exotic locations. Because Durov does not want for money. He seems to have made a bit of money through Telegram and usually businessmen, they have more than one venture going on.

 

So I’m not really sure what he’s into exactly. But he makes money.

 

So apparently the girl, the Instagram girl, was with him when he flew to France. So she was in his jethe. She went there with him. And it’s speculated upon that perhaps either due to her naivety, her stupidity, or maybe deliberate mal intense, she was responsible for him being arrested by French authorities because they were either tracking him through watching her movements or she was working for them directly. I think the first situation is more likely.

 

But then there’s another rumour that Macron invited him to France. France, which I don’t know. I haven’t seen much weight behind that one. But apparently it’s true to Macron’s style, apparently Macron invited him for some sort of I don’t know, how would you describe it? Some sort of assembly. They were going to have dinner or something, and there was going to be other people there.

 

But it was a ruse just to get him to come to France so he could be arrested. It’s common knowledge apparently, that the French government, French authorities, they’ve wanted to arrest Durov for a while. While they don’t like Telegram there, and Durov is, I think, a dual citizen, French citizen and also Russian. Is that right, Joel? Is he a Russian citizen? I think he is, I think, so long as he remained in Russia and his Telegram servers remained in Russia, there was nothing the French government could do about it. There’s nothing any European nation state could do about it.

 

Joel Davis: Based in Russia. I think he bases it in more neutral countries, maybe.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. Yeah, see, that goes to show I don’t actually know. All I know is those are the main two rumours.

 

The first one being the Instagram girl responsible for his arrest.

 

And the second being he was responding to an invitation by someone in Macron’s office directly to come to France.

 

So either way, it was a mistake for him to go to France. And he’s learning that now. He was just bailed about in the last, 24 hours, and it’s 5 million Euro, his bail bond, which is equivalent to about five and a half million US dollars, according to news sources. It’s a lot of money. It’s a lot of money.

 

And I’ve always thought credit bail was funny. It’s kind of ridiculous in a way that you can buy your way out of custody. Yeah, well, you can buy your way out of custody. You’re in custody and they don’t want to let you go because if they let you go, you might skip the country and not come back.

 

And then their whole criminal case is just defunct. It’s gone.

 

But if you pay them enough money, they’ll be willing to take that risk. Because then, even if you do skip the country, well, at least they got your money. So they don’t care. So everything just comes down to money with the judiciary and justice system.

 

At the end of the day, I know that credit bail is not so popular in Australia. It’s not something you regularly hear about. It’s something that you have to specifically requests. If they’ve already denied your bail. You usually just get bail if you’re on criminal charges without having to put up any money. But it depends on who you are, obviously, if you’re Durov and you’ve got money, they’re going to try to get money out of you. The French government and the judiciary, they want some of that money. And it’s probably not in Durov’s interest to try to leave France immediately. I believe the government would expect that he would try to do that now.

 

And so he probably wants to sit tight for at least a few months until the heat dies down. He’s got to check in at a police station twice per week and remain in France. Apparently, those are his bail conditions. Checking in at a police station basically means you just have to go and sign a document saying you’re still in the country and you haven’t run away as part of a bail condition. It was imposed on me once when I was young. You have to go within a certain time, too. If you’re late, they aren’t very lenient. If you’re late to a sign in date, then they don’t like that they can breach your bail for one mishap.

 

So you’ve got to be pretty switched on with your appointments and schedule.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty alarming, though, that the moment he landed in France, he was intercepted by what I assume is a special operations group because it would have required specific intelligence of a certain type coming from a specific branch of special government to know that he was going to land in a private jet at a certain time, at a certain location. Right. That requires Intel and special operations authority group, probably mercenaries, hired mercenaries. They arrest him, they take him to jail. And the French government says it’s basically because you’re not censoring who we tell you to censor. It’s because you’re not playing ball with us. You’re providing a very popular social media platform and you’re not abiding by our censorship directives.

 

So you’re in jail now being charged with all these trumped up offences about allowing or being complicit in criminal activity. I’m sure criminal activity happens on all social media, right, Joe? Like, I’m sure drug dealers meet up.

 

Joel Davis: As a result of talking on Facebook, on Instagram.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Investigators. And then publicized it, and then it just got deleted. And no one got criminally investigated, and nothing happened to Instagram, but they were operating freely until someone, you know, publicized it in the media. Hey, there’s this pedo ring and people. You could blame Instagram for that, or you could just say:

 

“Well, you know, moderation is difficult.”

 

They managed to moderate racism. It seems like all their moderation is so focused on racism, they got no moderation left over to focus on paedophilia on a site like Instagram.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but on Telegram about that. But look, it’s a big, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s pretty free.

 

And it’s like, yeah, if you allow freedom, you know, freedom is It can be used for good or evil. You know, that’s. And that’s part of it.

 

I personally think I would much rather have free Internet where people can do nefarious activity and the authorities are responsible for prosecuting that particular nefarious activity. Because the thing is, so they get Instagram to stop people from engaging in nefarious activity. Well, they’re not going to just stop engaging in it entirely. They’re just going to find some other way to do it.

 

But really what it’s about, the French government don’t actually care about paedophilia. They don’t actually care about whatever other issues they’re trying to put on him. They care about stopping racism, they care about stopping anti-semitism. That’s what it’s really about. They don’t want any social media to be free. And that’s just very clear and obvious because Telegram, until Twitter recently, and I guess now, like Rumble, Telegram at one point was the last bastion of free speech in all social media that anyone actually uses.

 

Like, there are that smaller social media, like Gab and so on, and respect to Andrew Torber, who runs Gab, but no one’s really on GAB. You know, no one’s really on these smaller sites. But Telegram is one of the most downloaded apps in the world. In Europe, it’s more popular than in Australia or America. People use it like WhatsApp.

 

As their primary messaging a to communicate with their friends. And it’s still pretty popular in Australia and America, but it’s super popular in Europe. Everyone has Telegram. In Europe, everyone uses it. So for it to be free and for people like me and you. Yeah, I know that we’ve been, I’ve been a banned recently and Tom has been a banned. But I don’t really blame Telegram for that because that is just, I’m only banning Telegram that you download from Google Play or you download from the Apple App Store, and that’s a condition for the a being available. So that’s really, that’s really Apple and Google imposing that, not Telegram.

 

Whereas if you download Telegram directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone, but you can do it on your Android phone, then there’s no a bands.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can make you wonder, Joel, I was thinking this. It doesn’t, it doesn’t make you wonder because Durov was not following censorship directives of France or European governments. This is how he’s treated. But no one working for Apple or Google, no major shareholders or CEO’s experienced the same treatment. So could you imagine the kind of data, the personal information of users that is just regularly and routinely handed over to governments by Apple and Google? Like, governments probably just have full access to whatever they want. They’re probably looking up your nostrils half the time if they want to be, you know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Like, I know, as you probably know all about my private life. That’s why I don’t want to say say too much more, actually. I’ll keep that to myself. Yeah, a zero know all about my private life. And it sucks to, but just part of the territory. They’re all about your private life. They probably know more about us than we know about our fucking selves at this point.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t go that far. I know myself pretty well. Well, I think I do.

 

Joel Davis: But they have wonder who ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] have a sign to analyze, like, our private life. It must be kind of sad because if you did actually analyze, probably have just kind of normal guys with we’re like, we’re like humans. We’re real human beings. And it’d be hard not to be a little bit sympathetic, like, you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It doesn’t matter though, because it would go down a bureaucratic sort of pathway, so it doesn’t actually matter. It goes through so many hands that by the time a decision is made, there’s no humanity left. But they’d probably just have psychologists that sort of interpret for them, and then it moves on to someone else who does a different interpretation and it paints a picture. Identify weak points. I don’t know, man. Like, it’s an interesting thing to observe or to discuss, but I’m not exactly sure how it would work.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s pretty disgusting, though. I mean, but it is what it is. But I don’t have any control over it. I just find it disgusting and repulsive.

 

But anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. Well, it’s disgusting! You can be morally against it, but finding out everything you possibly can about what you consider to be a potential threat to you or an enemy in warfare, it’s actually just part of the game. You want as much information as you possibly can on an enemy so, you know how to approach them, when to approach them. If to approach them and, just methods of attack, etc. Etc. Like, if you know anything about warfare, gathering as much information as possible on an enemy target is just essential.

 

So I don’t know. Obviously, technology is being used to that end by certain governments and government departments against dissidents right now. Because dissidents like the government, the government is at war with dissidents when you think about it.

 

Joel Davis: But in a way, I think it might potentially be a good thing because if there’s anyone at the Australian intelligence services who isn’t like a total ideological retard, and they would know the truth about us and they analyzed us extensively, they would realise that we’re actually patriots, that we’re actually noble figures with morals, that we are not reckless, we’re not terrorists, we’re not bad guys.

 

Blair Cottrell: That.

 

Joel Davis: We actually aren’t a threat.

 

Whereas when they’re analyzing all the other freaks that they’re looking into, they would find the complete opposite when they’re looking into the Islamic terrorists or whatever, when they’re analyzing all these operations by the Indians and the Chinese and so on to infiltrate our government that they’ve uncovered.

 

And then they would analyze us and they’d see us talking about all the threats that they identify, like, yes, we shouldn’t have Indians. We shouldn’t have Chinese. Look, what is the Chinese government doing? Look at what the jews are doing. Look at what the Muslims are doing. And Asia would be like, these guys are right. Like, this is, everything else that we are researching is literally the stuff that they’re concerned about. That’s kind of crazy!

 

So maybe ASIO would realise, like, wait a second, why are we looking at these guys so hard?

 

And I actually might explain why when they had Mike Burgess, the director of ASIO, before the Senate inquiry recently, and they were asking him questions about us, he did, honestly, he didn’t seem too bothered by us, didn’t want to go into too extensive detail. Obviously, he has to put on a show for the jews and the Leftist. Like, he’s very concerned about Right-wing terrorism and they’re looking into it and they’ve got their eye on us. But he would know that we’re not going to commit terrorist acts. He would know that we’re actually patriotic forces. We just want to participate in liberal democracy like everybody else, and that we’re actually quite reasonable and rational. And the threats that we’ve identified are actually reasonable and rational threats.

 

And ultimately, these people are getting upset because we’re exercising our free, our rights to freedom of political expression and organising, which every Australian is supposed to be entitled to have under liberal democracy. And he probably is kind of sick and tired of these communists and jews constantly pressuring him to waste his time and energy making reports about us going to the park and kickboxing each other or messaging each other funny racist memes or something, and wants to actually focus upon real counter espionage against Australia’s actual enemies.

 

So he kind of had that attitude of like why am I here? Almost like, this is fucking retarded! But going through the motions. I thought that was interesting and that sent an inquiry. It was like, they were making a lot of really, like, basic errors in their analysis of us. It was like a bunch of low IQ retards that put in barely any effort, were the ones that were researching us and put together the reports. They were getting really, like, basic details wrong in their discussion of us. And it was a lot of waffle. I listened to a substantial portion of it, so I found that interesting as well. It’s like they don’t actually have very competent public facing researchers that are writing these reports about us.

 

I feel like ASIO would probably have a more competent team behind the scenes that’s creating their internal reporting. And I would imagine their internal reporting is vastly different than the stuff that gets reported in the media, which is probably why, even though counter-terrorism, which is a different part of the government than ASIO, counter-terrorism seems very focused upon trying to disrupt our organising and slow our growth and spook people out from associating. Why ASIO has said “we’re awful, but lawful” and haven’t prescribed us as a terrorist organisation and a kind of letting us cook. To a certain extent, I would anticipate that’s probably why. Because they actually have the information and maybe the competency to realise that the way that we’re presented in the media is a load of bullshit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they’re bound by certain. These agencies are bound by certain laws and procedures as well. They can’t just do whatever they want. If you’re not actually advocating for violence, you’re not engaging in or planning violence. There’s really not a lot they can do they can just kind of observe and make reports, because I think there’s too much energy is spent on all of these little ideological groups. When I think government agencies, intelligence agencies, I think would be their resources would be better used focusing on state based threats, like, meaning foreign interference is actually the result of another country trying to interfere with ours. You know, that’s where I think, huh?

 

Joel Davis: That’s what it’s supposed to be for. That’s why it was created.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! But we’ve, ever since the War on Terror and the idea of, like little terrorist cells and ideological extremism kind of sprung from that. And now our intelligence departments are busy chasing ghosts. All these little, like so-called ideological extremist, homegrown terrorists, as they call you know, radicals and so forth, you know, which are really just young kids who are just shitposting on the Internet. And all these resources get wasted on that while real state based threats are active in the country at high levels of government and institutions.

 

So, like I said:

 

“I think intelligence.”

 

Joel Davis: We would like to be running the government. We would like to be in political power, and that would be our ultimate aspiration. But we’re proud Australians. Like, we just want to serve our nation and its interests. That’s completely different than a foreign actor, foreign state actor on behalf of the Chinese government or even the Indian government trying to steal, you know, state secrets or compromised politicians or what Israel does, where Israel is a foreign state and it basically owns elements of our media, elements of our political establishment, or the threat of Islamic terrorism, where these are outsiders with a completely hostile culture, hostile religion, hostile everything who want to commit acts of terrorism to destabilise and ultimately destroy Australian society. And just cause. Just hurt people for the sake of it and this kind of thing.

 

So we’re completely different. They shouldn’t even have a file on us. Like, according to the reason why they exist, obviously, they are kind of compelled to by the current political paradigm.

 

But anyway, I think on some level, some of them would probably realise that is all I’m saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the problem with that is just to wrap that subject up, I would assume it happens in intelligence departments because it happens with police and prison officers. They shuffle around stuff. So they’ll put you on something and then they’ll take you off it and put you somewhere else so you don’t develop too much familiarity or sympathy for anyone you’re dealing with in that area.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, you know, so, you know, reported on this that the people that they put on to research Right-wing extremism, which would mean literally us and our friends, that they have to cycle them out every six or eight months or something and then put them through a de-radicalisation program.

 

Because if you spend six to eight months watching us. And you’re not like, a fat communist, or a jew or something. If you’re just a normal White person and you’re watching us, you’d be like:

 

“Fuck! These cunts actually make sense!”

 

Because we’re the ones that actually do make the most sense in all of Australian politics.

 

And so they have to put them through, like, a brainwashing programme to deprogram from them, from realizing that we’re actually right about pretty much everything!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I think it’s a pretty common. It’s a pretty common process with various agencies just to avoid that familiarity. Like, I’ve been through my stories in jail, how they would take prison officers and put them in our particular unit for three to four weeks, but then they would move them either to a different unit or even a different prison, if it was a prison owned by the same, or organised by the same administration, because we have some privately owned jails in Australia, and then we wouldn’t see those prison officers again for months.

 

So the idea was that as long as you’re not too familiar with, you don’t know the people you’re supposed to be watching or dealing with too well, then you pay more attention. You don’t miss as much.

 

So it’s kind of common sense as well. So I understand why it’s done.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty funny that the Right. The drag programs, I can understand why that would happen. Is there any other news for this week? Have you noticed the wind? Have you noticed the wind? The wind?

 

Joel Davis: A gale outside.

 

Blair Cottrell: Been so windy the last few days. Part of my fence just blew apart, like, pieces of my fence everywhere. So I had to go out there and reinforce it with chains and stuff. I don’t know where it came from either. It hasn’t been as windy in ages, but crazy gale force winds down here in southeast Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Has been pretty fucking windy.

 

Anyway, so we’re getting to the Superchats. White Power said:

 

“Thank you, sir. We love the White people!”

 

Obviously a reference to discourse. Ukrainian Groyper said:

 

“Talking to an Indian at service support is a gateway to racism.”

 

And it’s obviously very true. Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indians, you know, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that? Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I was just watching something else. What did you say?

 

Joel Davis: Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indian, like, workers on the phone, like, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, nothing really amusing. This one thing comes to mind. Years and years ago, I used to play, like, Warcraft on this private server. And they offered these in game currency things, and I bought, like, $15 worth because I really wanted something in the game. Don’t worry, I don’t play games anymore. As I’m past this now, this is when I was younger, and it was some sketchy website, though. And I used my debit card to buy it, and I got it. Like, I got the in game currency that I was trying to purchase.

 

But then some hold got put on my account. My card wouldn’t work, and I got a phone call the next day from someone working at the bank. And it was an Indian guy. It was really hard to understand, but he seemed really distressed, and he seemed convinced that I’d been scammed. And I was trying to tell him:

 

“No. Like, I decided to make this purchase online. Like, I bought some tokens for a game. It’s fine, you can open my account again.”

 

But he wouldn’t believe me. And he’s like:

 

“Show me the website. Like, what website did you go to? What was it called? You know, they shouldn’t be taking money from your account.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Bro, calm down. Listen.”

 

And then when he finally understood, he was just like, I’m just like, look, I bought tokens, and I got the tokens. Are you sure you got the Tokens? And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, I got the tokens, bro. It’s all good.”

 

He’s just like:

 

“Okay.”

 

But stuff that’s probably not that funny. But I don’t know, man. It’s not. There’s not really often amusing stories when it comes to dealing with Indians in public service, private sector, on the phone, rideshare services, it’s never amusing. It’s always just really frustrating. The smell of cigarettes, that accent, and the constant talking in a language that just does not sound very appealing to listen to. Obnoxiousness, inconsideration, arrogance. These are the words that come to mind when I think of dealing with Indian people.

 

Joel Davis: So where are you from? We are from India.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, great!

 

Joel Davis: That’s wonderful!

 

Thank you very much.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all I need to. Bob.

 

Joel Davis: No, I just found that funny. Even Trump’s landing to the pajeets.

 

But, yeah, I basically don’t answer the phone when it’s a number that I don’t know.

 

So I don’t really have any stories of talking to Indians on the phone because I seldom really talk to anyone on the phone except for my friends. That’s probably why I have no stories of getting a call from the intelligence services. Maybe they’ve tried to call me, I just haven’t picked up the phone. There’s no point.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have they actually have they actually never rang you? Because almost everyone gets a call eventually.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I would not have answered the phone. That’s the thing. Like, I don’t answer the phone and unless I know the number that’s calling me. Cause I mean, I barely wanna talk to the people I actually know, let alone people I don’t even fucking know, you know what I mean? What? Like what? Possibly if anyone needs to talk to me, they can send me a text or an email or something, you know what I mean? Leave a message.

 

But yeah, I don’t like I’m busy I got my own thing going on. I don’t wanna just like stop what I’m doing so that some random person I don’t know can tell me something like, I’m not interested. Um, Ukrainian groipe also said Indians are first incels. Do you mean they’re the first incels or. I don’t know exactly what that means.

 

But yeah, Indians obviously are like curry cells. They could be called like Indians obviously have the greatest incel characteristics because they’re the most repulsive. Southern fried 33 said phone battery at 88%. Okay, let’s go.

 

And he also said, hold the line. Fellow comrades said a good show. The G question is becoming more and more relevant, by the way. Lately people have been dropping tiny homes in backyards to avoid permits and take advantage of low rent demand, increasing density. Yeah, I have seen, I’ve seen those for rent online as well, where you can rent, you know, some tiny home in someone’s backyard. Yeah, and that’s what happens. Like when you flood the country with too many immigrants and there’s too many people to fit in in housing, then basically that’s what happens. Like you now all you can afford is to live in some shitty tiny home in some random dudes backyard because you can’t afford to have your own home. It’s pretty fucked up! GoyBoy 1488 said looking forward to the Joel slash Devon Stack collaboration, whenever that happens. He normally doesn’t have co-hosts that allow him to fully pop off. Yeah, well, I messaged him about it, he seemed keen, but he still didn’t go back to me about any of the details.

 

So maybe I shouldn’t have said anything until we actually organised something in concrete. But I sure we’ll do something at some point. And yeah, I do like his rants.

 

So that was one of my goals, was to provoke him into ranting.

 

Basically. Mr Webster said, I bet you lads have already seen the Pajeet world order documentary. Voice by the AI David Attenborough. Voice over what really made me feel that Indians need to be removed was their devastating impact on the global environment. Whites are the only race that care about endangered animal species in our planet. Yes, exactly.

 

On The Joel and Blair Show, we’re racist because, you know, we’re environmentalists. And yeah, they really are an invasive species.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s no lie. I do like the environment, love being outdoors. I like animals. So it’s no lie.

 

Joel Davis: I like animals better than jeets or yeah, pretty much most other rate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like all, you’re interested in humans generally, though, whereas I tend to be more interested in animals than I am in humans. Intuitively, I feel like I understand humans, but you have some sort of like, for you, humans provide this intrigue. Like, you’re really interested in learning about people and their ideas, whereas when I’m with a group of people, I will be the ones sitting over by himself watching birds or something like that. Like, I’ve just I lose interest in humans really quickly.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, birds are cool. I remember going through, like, a bird autism phase when I was a little kid.

 

Anyway, what else we got here? Gandalf said, how is an Eastern religion compatible with Europeans? As of now, it is not imposed upon Europeans, enforce or culturally, and we see how Europeans have come to reject it and is decreasing. Is this a sign? It is unwelcome when Europeans have the opportunity to get rid of it. Are you talking about Christianity? I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about here by Eastern religion, but if you’re talking about Christianity, which presumably is what you’re talking about, Christianity was imposed by force in some areas, but also not really in most areas. Like, it did spread pretty naturally within the Roman Empire. The late stage Roman Empire did persecute, ultimately, pagans and heretics, but Christianity had already spread organically, and they persecuted largely, like, heretical sects of Christianity, like under emperor Justinian or whatever. Christianity spread, didn’t spread by force to Britain or Ireland, France or any of these places. It kind of went there naturally. It was imposed by force upon the Scandinavian countries.

 

And then, you know, people weren’t forced to stay. Like, it’s been hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years where people weren’t forced to stay Christians, you wouldn’t get put to death for not going to church or something. And Christianity has really only started dying out in the European people in, basically the last century and recently.

 

So to me, I think you have to look more at cultural explanations rather than just seeing it in terms of imposed by force.

 

You know, I think it’s kind of like a incorrect historical analysis. You have to look at the reasons why was Christianity appealing at a certain period in history and to what groups, and why is it maybe now unappealing? You know, it’s not just down to, oh, as soon as people didn’t get put to death for not being Christians, they all became atheists. That’s not actually an accurate picture of history. Hans Rudol said, not sure if you saw my link, but did you hear about the Israeli data leak from Iranian hackers? That was leaked on Telegram. That was only days before the Telegram guy got arrested. I did hear about that.

 

And undoubtedly, the Israelis would be one of the main interest groups, or the jews, obviously, one of the main interest groups in keeping Telegram censored, because, I mean, they’re the main interest groups in keeping the whole Internet censored. And Telegram, along with Twitter, is the second most key platform for getting information out that the jews don’t want that exists. Do you? What do you think about that, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, what was the question? Sorry, I was just rereading some of the Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, no, it’s all good. It was just. He was just talking about how just a few days before Durov was arrested, there was a leak of sensitive Israeli data on Telegram by Iranians, Iranian Telegram channels.

 

And so people were speculating that there was something, you know, that had something to do with Durov being arrested.

 

But I don’t think it would have, because I think the plans to arrest him probably existed already, more than just a few days before it happened.

 

So I don’t think that was necessarily the cause.

 

But obviously, at the same time, the jews would want him arrested, I think, and would probably want Telegram censored and pressured into censoring discourse because they want a war platform censored, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why does this word come to my mind? Give me 1 second. Precarious. Precarious. Not securely held or in position. Yeah, look, there’s the right word. Even though I wasn’t sure of its definition. Durov is currently in a precarious position. Position now. Just starting to get a little bit tired. It’s been a big day, but he’s in a position that’s obviously favourable to. How would you describe them? European governments, jewish influenced governments. He’s in their field now. So he made a mistake going to France, and he’s going to have to get out of this situation somehow. I’m not sure how he’s going to do it. Like I said, he’s best to sit tight for a few months and wait, but when the time is right, he needs to get out of there and not go back.

 

Joel Davis: He ingratiated himself with the United Arab Emirates Royal Family and has become a citizen of the UAE and the United Arab Emirates, which is where Dubai and Abu Dhabi is. Their government has now put pressure on the French government because they had an order, I think, of twelve fighter jets that the French manufacturer, and they cancelled that order worth many billions of dollars. And they’re putting a lot of diplomatic pressure on the French, saying, how dare you arrest our citizen. This is improper, and so on.

 

So that might help him, because that is not. That’s kind of significant.

 

So that’s probably smart of him to ingratiate himself with the UAE.

 

Blair Cottrell: In my mind, I’m feeling like there’s something, a move he should make right now, or maybe not right now, but soon. But I need to actually sleep and think on it before I can work it out, because, like I said, he needs to get in a position more favourable to his future. Right now, he’s in a position where he can be forced to take a deal that’s not to his advantage other than the bail deal, and the deal could affect. Telegram. I hope he doesn’t do that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he just needs to get the hell out of there and not ever go back to Europe if you can. Like, you can probably just go hang out in some bullshit! I think he was already kind of hanging out in bullshit like, non-Western countries anyway, that won’t extradite him to Western countries.

 

So that’s basically probably going to have to be his life now if he wants to be Durov, the Telegram guy. I’m sure Elon Musk is sweating, too, because if they’re going to go after him, you know, would they do the same thing to Musk?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can they? What isn’t Musk in America? They can’t really do stuff like that.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, if he travels to Europe the EU has been pretty, and the British government has criticised him. Our government has criticised him in well publicized cases. So he probably feels nervous to travel to other Western countries outside of America now, to a certain extent, although arresting Elon Musk would be, like, crazy! Right? Because he’s got so allies, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think that would happen unless. That wouldn’t happen unless someone at the US State Department signed off on it or said it was okay first. Because how much influence does the US have over Europe? A fair bit.

 

Joel Davis: But say, Elon went there next week. Would they think:

 

“Oh, when Trump is in, Trump is allied with Elon, we get fucked on? Maybe now’s the time to do it.”

 

You know, there could be some kind of game. So he probably feels a little nervous, I would say he probably doesn’t feel 100% secure going to Europe right now. And the leader, the guy’s name, but the CEO of Rumble, he left Europe, I believe, got the hell out of there immediately after Durov was arrested, I guess fearing that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he didn’t actually say anything until he was gone. Musk is a bigger fish than Durov. Much bigger fish.

 

So I think maybe the French government, the EU here, they’re trying to set a precedent. They’re seeing how this goes. This is their test case. They’re going to see what Durov does next and whether or not they can actually get a conviction. If they can get a conviction, that’s a big precedent. It’s a bad precedent. So it’s all going to be very interesting. I’ll be following it closely.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s definitely important. Like, free speech on the Internet is vital for everything that we do. It’s so important that Twitter or X Telegram Rumble, these three sites in particular, are kind of protected and maintained. And I am a little bit concerned that after this election cycle, that maybe a little bit of freedom was opened up on Twitter and Rumble specifically to help fuel some kind of Right-wing sentiment that would help Trump get over the line, and that perhaps when he gets elected, they might cuck a little bit on their moderation policies because it no longer serves that temporary political advantage. I hope that I’m wrong about that, but it is a theory that many people have, which does have a little bit of sense behind it, because both the people behind Rumble and Elon Musk are supporters of Donald Trump’s election bid.

 

So that is a concern. So hopefully next year we don’t all get cucked and banned off everything again.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but Trump doesn’t really have the support of the meme as he’s not being propped up by, …

 

Joel Davis: Maybe they thought it would. It hasn’t really worked, though, because. Yeah, because Trump the culture has gone more radical. I mean, what we’re talking about tonight the most radical, the most popular thing on Twitter right now is hating Indians. Like, it’s literally the number one topic in the global Twitter discourse is how much Indian stink.

 

So, I mean, that’s hilarious!

 

But that is not what was happening in 2016. In 2016, people were making, you know, sensible arguments about how Islam, Islamic people have a propensity to commit terrorism and this kind of thing. It was much softer rhetoric back then on. And social media wasn’t as well regulated back then either, by the way. Like, you could post Nazi memes on Facebook, you could post Holocaust revisionist documentaries on YouTube and get away with it. And the censorship regime, in many respects, came in in response to the culture that was unleashed. What at first was a slightly edgy Right-wing culture, quickly mutated into what the Alt-Right became, which was full on hardcore White nationalist and pro-national socialist talking points proliferating all over the Internet. They shut that down. Then they kind of cracked things open again in the last year or two with this kind of Rumble.

 

And Twitter led counter attack against the censorship regime. And what has happened, it’s just unleashed an even stronger wave of racism back onto the Internet, where, like, Twitter is now 4chan, basically, in its level of discourse. And, yeah, will Elon Musk be able to hold that for in perpetuity? Does he actually even want to? These are open questions, but you’re right that I don’t think Trump is benefiting from it at all, because he doesn’t have that radical vibe that he had in 2016. And that’s partly because he’s a known quantity now.

 

Blair Cottrell: Even though he got. Even though he got a bullet, even though he took a bullet through his ear, he still doesn’t have the radical vibe. It’s pretty impressive. Like, it’s impressive level of normalisation he’s going for. He’s making a strong effort, I suppose, not to appear too radical despite someone trying to shoot him in the head. And I’m only narrowly surviving. It’s almost like that assassin assassination attempt is old news already. No one even cares. That’s what it feels like down here in Australia anyway. I’s like, all right, what’s next?

 

Whereas I think, you know, an assassination attempt on a US president, previously, it would have been big news for a long time, right? But politics moves so quickly now. And the average person’s dopagenic response, receptivity to information, power of remembering, it’s all much smaller.

 

And so it’s not even really a big deal to Australians that Trump almost got his head blown off. Now it’s like, if you mention it, someone will go, oh, yeah, yeah, I remember that. Yeah. But they’ll remember it as though it happened a long time ago.

 

Joel Davis: It was so hype at the time, and if you told me that in two weeks no one would give a fuck anymore, I would have said, surely not, but that’s literally what happens.

 

But you can only blame Trump. Like, he purposefully pivoted to the centre, like you said, and, yeah, made himself boring. And that was probably the strategy to beat Biden because he was kind of cruising to a victory over that assassination.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel. That was after whoever it was tried to shoot him. That was the perfect moment to pivot to a more extreme message and really push hard. And he still would have been elected, he would have been loved, he would have won over the same powers that got him into the office in the first place before Joe Biden was in. Yeah, but he kind of wasted an opportunity there. I think he listens too much to his more lukewarm advisors. He does. Or maybe he just is too tied in with certain people and he can’t afford not to follow their directives at this point. I don’t know what it is, but politics is messy, it’s complex. I just think he missed a big opportunity there.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely, 100% agree with you. And you can make the argument that the campaign this time, like the first time it was about the wall. Now he’s saying, let’s amass the port or the Mexicans. You can say that’s maybe even more radical the original time, but it feels less radical. And that’s partly because the Right-wing culture has moved on.

 

He has cucked in other areas and has a legacy when he was president and so on, of kind of cucking and failing to follow through. And the energy that was there in 2016 was this idea of, I’m going to go after the establishment, I’m going to put Clinton in the bushes and Obamas, I’m going to put them all in jail, and we’re going to lock up this corrupt establishment and America’s back, and the people actually have power again. He had that populist aura of taking on the establishment that no longer exists. Now it’s just about the policies. Oh, well, if you vote for Kamala, then you won’t get this policy or that policy. He’s just not the politician now. He’s not this kind of revolutionary figure. That was the energy of the 2016 campaign, which obviously a load of bullshit! As soon as he got in, none of that materialised. And they then went after him. They tried to lock him up. They did what he promised to do to them, to act to him.

 

And then he was like:

 

“Hey, you can’t do this!”

 

And just cucked and just showed weakness. I, that’s really the essence of why people don’t really have much energy for it, is because that kind of rebellion against the elites, that sense of people’s justice or whatever, that, like, bane from Batman energy that he had the first time is just completely gone now. And that’s the biggest loss. And, yeah, additionally, the campaign leaves a lot to be desired. They don’t, they’re not dog whistling White nationalism enough. They, if they wanted to win, they really had to energize White voters. And White people are energized, but they’re energized in a way that really doesn’t have much fuel for the Trump campaign. They’re energized just spontaneously by, like, current events, and they kind of feel politically alienated. He just seems like another conservative now.

 

And I think that’s a good thing because it shows that the Right-wing culture has progressed, it’s become more radical, it’s become more demanding that it’s not placated by a Trump anymore.

 

Blair Cottrell: But has it, in the process, though, has it become more detached from the masses?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know. I think if you look at the data out of the United States the masses are way more in support of mass deporting non-White immigrants in America. You know, they’d done a poll a few years ago on Trump voters, and they said:

 

“What’s a bigger problem, racism or anti-White discrimination?”

 

And they all, I think, like two thirds of them said anti-White discrimination.

 

So, you know, they’ve done a lot of polling to show that Trump supporters and Americans in general are more closer aligned to us on racial issues. They’re softer on other issues, like they’re more pro-abortion, they’re more pro-gay marriage, they’re less Christian. You know, all these other issues that were previously conservative issues, like the social issues associated with conservatism, the Right has lost on all of those issues. The only place where they’re actually making gains is on racial issues. That’s the only place they’re making gains. But I, you’re not seeing a pivot, really in the political establishment that is a requisite to that.

 

I mean, we’re talking about in Australia, people care more than two years ago, everyone was talking about Covid and then climate change. No one cares about that anymore. Now it’s all about immigration, now it’s all about the housing crisis and shit like that! So, like, our political issues are winning out. Like our. I think we’re having a stronger presence again online with a Twitter opening up and so on. And European politics, where they actually have populist Right-wing parties that are plugged into youth appeal and so on, you’re seeing them all do very well in the polls and in elections over there.

 

So that shows that if we had an equivalent kind of political release valve for Nativist anti-immigration sentiment here, it probably would do very well. And in America, they probably do very well as well.

 

But it’s just our systems are different in the Anglo-sphere. We don’t really quite have that.

 

I mean, even in Britain the Reform Party did very well at the last election, then they had the riots, which was, in my opinion, I’ll still say it good to see an actual response from White people in Britain when their children are attacked, because plenty of those kinds of things have happened over the last few months or over the last few years, I should say, where innocent White children have been victimized and there hasn’t been a response like that.

 

So it was good to see.

 

And then the Reform Party is now polling above the conservatives and polling close almost to the Labor Party and the Labor Party sinking in the polls.

 

So the British public is responding to those race riots by getting more Right-wing, more pro-populist.

 

And obviously, we don’t support. We don’t think that a populist Right-wing party is going to be enough of like a Pauline Hanson style or Nigel Farage style politics. But if people are going more to that kind of politics in response to a race, right, that’s a good thing. That shows that it’s a start focusing more on the Right issues. Yeah, exactly!

 

So I think we are in the ascendancy culturally, and our ideas are getting more popular. Like, back during Covid no one was really talking about immigration, no one was talking about jewish power. Now because of what’s happening with Israel and what’s happening with the housing crisis and the immigrants flooding over the border after Covid across the Anglo-sphere, now our issues are the main issues again in politics.

 

So I think, yeah, we’re definitely in an ascendancy moment meta-politically, culturally. We don’t have the organisation institutionally to implement, to translate that into a proper political manifestation, really, either here or in America properly. So that’s, I guess the next step is building a more radical kind of politics.

 

And I think here, you know, we’ve got what we’re doing and the aspiration maybe to build a political party ultimately, if we can get enough manpower and resources together to do it. In America, though, building a small, minor party doesn’t really work as well in their system.

 

So they’re going to have to get more creative. I don’t know exactly what the solution, solution would be in America, but they, I think they need to detach themselves from the Trump thing, like, whether Trump wins or loses, this is the last Trump election cycle. I think they’ll be good for the American Right to have to look beyond Trump finally and come up with something else where they have to figure out, well, I think it would be creating in America pro-White lobby groups, pro-White advocacy groups that are of, that explicitly organise White Americans around their interests, rather than trying to just use the Republican Party, which is they’ve lost control of, it’s controlled by jews, and that’s filled now with non-Whites and non-White interests, it’s totally cucked!

 

Look at how the jews control things. The jews have all these pro-jewish organisations, and then those organisations then function as pressure groups, and they fund, they lobby and they fund people, and they embed themselves in the media, and they fund think tanks and fund people to then go into media jobs, go into political jobs, they fund political campaigns, they pressure politicians.

 

And so they’re able to exert power over the system through that infrastructure. I think White Americans should be trying to build that kind of thing.

 

And then through activism, through lobbying, through these kinds of mechanisms, try and change things, rather than just simply, we got to get the Republican guy elected. Guys, everyone, just cuck to whatever the platform is of whoever’s running on the GOP ticket and try and get them into power. That doesn’t work like that. You’re giving your loyalty in exchange for nothing.

 

Meanwhile, the jews, they give their loyalty in exchange for concessions. Every other group gets concessions in exchange for loyalty because they’re organised. Whites aren’t organised. They get no concessions for their loyalty, even though they’ve got the most votes, even though they’ve got the most money. They’re just not organised.

 

So I think that’s really the next step in America. And here, as well, political parties are really the last step of the process. After you’ve got your people organised, after you’ve got money, you’ve got manpower, you’ve got some kind of functional hierarchy where you can direct manpower and resources in an intelligent and strategic way. Now you’ve got a negotiation leverage to impose yourself upon politics and be able to be influential in politics. So figuring out that kind of project of political entrepreneurship in a pro-White way, to me, that’s the next paradigm for us, rather than just thinking in this narrow way in terms of party politics.

 

So anyway, there’s a bit of a rant, by the way, you know, people, I can see people asking questions in the chat, like, directed towards me, you know, this isn’t a fucking charity you want to ask me questions, fucking pay me, you know what I mean? But I did see one person ask me about in the Cozy chat, they didn’t pay me about my milk bottle. This, like, where do you get this from? Well, I bought this from Kmart for $3. We get, we get our raw milk supply, but it comes in buckets. And then I put it in the bottle myself. I don’t buy it in the bottle because raw milk isn’t something you can buy at the shop. It’s illegal for them to sell it to you at the shop.

 

So I have to bottle it myself, basically.

 

So that’s where I get the bottles from. And, yeah, I can’t recommend raw milk enough. If you can get a supply, it is vastly superior than pasteurized milk.

 

Blair Cottrell: Completely different flavour. Rich, slightly more sweet, creamy, more dense. Completely different colour, too. Like that milk from the supermarket. That pasteurized milk, it’s unnaturally White. Milk shouldn’t be that White.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just better for you in so many ways. Like, your body just takes in the nutrients so much more easily, and you can feel that.

 

And it’s also very good for fertility, I’ve heard.

 

But, yeah, I really highly recommend it. And it’s almost, when I drink like three litres in a day of raw milk, particularly of an evening, if I really like to lug it down, it’s got like a nootropic effect, almost like I feel like my mind is full of inspiration. Inspiration. And, yeah, it’s. I don’t know, it’s almost like a quasi spiritual experience.

 

Blair Cottrell: Raw milk, guys, the choice of autists, but it’s got lactase. One of the main reasons it’s actually easier to digest and better for you is because it doesn’t go through the pasteurisation process, meaning they don’t boil the living out of it. The lactase enzyme remains in the milk, which is what your body needs to digest the lactose. Right. The milk sugars.

 

And once that lactase enzyme is destroyed through pasteurisation, the milk sugars don’t digest properly. They don’t split properly during digestion. They need to split. That’s what the lactase does. And actually, lactose free milk doesn’t exist.

 

If you look at the ingredients on lactose free milk, it’ll say milk, cow’s milk.

 

And then the lactase enzyme is re added to the milk so you can digest the lactose properly.

 

So there’s no such thing as lactose free milk. They boil the milk traditionally, if it’s going to a supermarket, destroying the lactase enzyme, making it difficult to digest. And then for people who think they’re lactose intolerant, they buy lactose free milk. It’s not lactose free. They just re added the enzyme that they destroyed in the first place.

 

So there’s some milk information for you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t really ever! I never had a problem with drinking regular milk. I still drink it when, like, I get a coffee or something like that. Um, or it’s in various other products, and it doesn’t really negatively affect me, but just raw milk is just so much higher quality like that. My body feels a lot better. You can just feel the sustenance from when you have a good steak or you have just high quality food, you just feel so much better. And raw, it’s not placebo. It definitely it definitely helps.

 

But yeah, we got more Superchats here. I got one on Entropy from the gump, who sent $14.88, which I always appreciate, and he said:

 

“Thanks for a good show. Is there any way to donate to Sewell’s house building project again?”

 

Yes, because we got de-platform from GiveSendGo on that one. We don’t actually have something set up right now, and it’s annoying because people are always asking me, how do I donate to the organisation? How do I donate to the organisation? And we need to get a new platform set up. We keep getting de-platformed, trying to set up ways to donate directly to the organisation, and we get a lot of money, I think, if we finally do. So hang tight. We’re working on it, and we’ll announce it soon when we come up with a solution. So that, yeah there’s a lot of people out there who say, I can’t really get involved because of this and that, but I’d like to help you guys out financially, obviously, we would appreciate that.

 

So, yeah, hang tight. It’s one way that that we’re not grifters, that we’re really terrible at raising money.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we always have been to. I even feel bad when I get money. Like, I don’t know if it’s a result of how I’ve been raised or if it’s a spiritual thing, but even when I’m making money and providing like a good service as I do as a personal trainer and online coach, something still feels like guilty about getting money. It doesn’t sit right with me. It’s the weirdest thing. Like I let people off all the time.

 

Joel Davis: Rather not have to deal with money, like to risk the crowd of the soul. I just want to like have my land and then all the other casts are like performing their role and then I’m just studying the great works of literature and I’ve got like my long grey beard that I’m stroking and people come to me for advice and my wisdom and I’ve been just engaging in my affairs in the palace and everything is just taken care of I don’t really need to buy or sell anything. That would be my ideal existence.

 

But obviously that’s a bit impractical at the moment, but we’re working towards it. Yeah. White power also sent another Superchat with, no, they didn’t put a caption, so I got nothing to read out. Southern fried, 33, said enjoying the show and he also said Australia has the best fauna and flora. I don’t know if I really agree with that. Like I honestly do like some of the animals they have in Europe better. Like kangaroos are kind of cool, I guess, but a lot of like emus are fucking retarde Uh, wombats are kind of cute they work. Koalas are kind of cute or whatever.

 

But we don’t have a moose, a deer, like to me that shit would be cooler. You know, lions, I know, you know, wolves, we don’t really have that kind of shit! Which to me is like, we have an eagle.

 

Blair Cottrell: Got the wedge tail eagle. The wedge style eagle is pretty cool!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, there’s some cool birds and shit, obviously, but kangaroo, we.

 

Blair Cottrell: Got the kangaroo, man. Have you seen some kangaroos? They’re jacked. Like almost any fat you can eat. Kangaroo. We have kangaroo meat for sale at the local supermarkets. It’s a strange meat. It’s a grainy meat that’s very lean. Like there’s no fat in it at all! It’s not clean by Christian standards because kangaroos have, like, paws, they don’t have hooves.

 

So I don’t know. I’ve tried it a few times. Can’t say I rate it, but it’s popular amongst bodybuilders because it’s just all protein.

 

Joel Davis: Kangaroo can be nice, but it’s very easy. It’s something that’s very easy to overcook. We used to get these kangaroo sausages that were quite nice on the barbecue.

 

But, yeah, I know that I don’t eat it that regularly. I’ve had some cool experiences with kangaroos.

 

Actually saw a few of them when I was up at the Gold Coast when we had our national meat. We first got up there, I was kind of with all these families with young kids and they wanted to go to the wildlife park.

 

So we went to the wildlife park and it was kind of nice, you know, seeing all the different animals that this, like, massive crocodile that was fucking huge. That was pretty impressive. But they had like a part where you can walk in and the kangaroos are all just chilling there and had this emu running around and I got like, a selfie with the emu and I was hanging out with some of the kangaroos, but they weren’t very. They’re pretty kind of low energy, to be honest.

 

But when I was a kid, I went to somewhere called Pambula, which is on the south coast of New South Wales. It’s near Bega and Marimbula, right near the Victorian border on the coast. There’s a big wildlife park there. I don’t know if it still exists because this was when I was a kid and it’s open and they got shitloads of kangaroos. And the kangaroos are used to humans, so you can walk up to them and pat them and stuff. They’re very friendly. And the kangaroos like it when you scratch them on the chest and they’ve got little arms like this and they just kind of go like. It’s kind of funny. Like they’re kind of retarded! They just love getting a scratch on the chest. But they got these big red kangaroos that are like fucking almost two and a half meters tall and shit! They’re massive! Pretty imposing.

 

But yeah, the kangaroos are kind of cool.

 

Obviously there’s an affinity with the kangaroo, but at the same time, I don’t know. I honestly prefer European animals. If I’m quite frank. The shogun said, hail victory, boys. Cheers. White power also said, question for Blair. How did you become so good at public speaking, especially with your previous protests back in the day? Do you mean rallies? And how did you become so articulate and well spoken, even in casual settings?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s a lot to unpack there. But what immediately comes to mind is you guys having the support of you guys, I sort of like, it just made me more passionate. It made me see that I wasn’t the only one who believed and understood what I believed and understood. And it just gave me the confidence. Just the constant support helped me to believe. Obviously, there’s more to it, and I can get into it a little bit more on another day, perhaps, because I’m a bit tired. We’ve been going for over two and a half hours now, and I’m almost ready for bed. What’s the time now?

 

Actually, yeah, we’re after 11:00 pm and I tend to be an early riser, so I’ll usually go to bed at about this time.

 

But, yeah, like. Look, I don’t feel like I am that good, especially as I’ve gotten a little bit older. I’m probably less articulate than I used to be, but, yeah, I didn’t even enjoy reading that much, to be honest. Like I said, there’s lots one pack there. I’d probably have to think about it. But I do appreciate the question, and thanks for the appreciation. I suppose.

 

Joel Davis: In my opinion, what makes you really effective at public speaking is your ability to tap into your emotional energy. And it just kind of rips through channels really effectively.

 

But also, I think, some of your best features. You were obviously applying the principles of Mein Kampf. You know, you had already kind of put a lot of thought into, how do I explain this very complex phenomenon in a way that is digestible to a normal person? And you’d obviously, like, kind of gone over that a lot in your mind.

 

And so you had your, like, core talking points and principles, so you’re able to just channel emotion into it, like a kind of aggression into a formula. And it came out very polished and very. But when people prepare what they’re going to say, you know, sometimes it can kind of seem like they’ve prepared what they’re going to say. And there’s something a little bit inauthentic about it.

 

But with you’re able to channel your emotion in such a way that it felt like it was just ripping out of you. And maybe it was to a certain extent like you prepared the ideas in your mind, but probably not the exact way of saying them. So it came out naturally. And that’s probably the key with public speaking.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s three things or three parts of the formula which are coming into my mind. Hopefully I remember them. Maybe they’re slipping from my mind. Now the first one is you have to actually believe in what you’re talking about. How should I describe that? It’s extremely potent when in your voice there is that genuine belief. Because people, ordinary people, they might be simple, but they’re not as stupid as some people think they are. They pick up on things. They’re intuitive, as we’ve said previously, people in large groups are much like a woman. They’re feminine in their instinct and nature and as a result they are intuitive.

 

So although they might not always be following you on an intellectual level, they’re feeling you and they’ll know if you’re not actually genuinely believing in what it is you’re saying. That’s why Parliamentarians are never popular with the people, because Parliamentarians don’t believe in other than their financial backers and political results. They’re not really motivated by that passionate belief in something greater. Right?

 

So you need that you need to actually believe what you’re saying and it needs to mean a lot to you.

 

Secondly, you need. You need to have confidence and not be distracted by the thought of what other people are thinking about you.

 

And the best way to do that is to understand the audience you’re speaking to being the Australian people or just regular working class, the kind of people who are going to criticise your speech, pull it apart, analyze its contents, ridicule you and laugh at it. These people are always going to exist, but they only make up a tiny percentage substrata of the people you’re actually reaching with your words. You need to not pay attention to the small conceited intellectuals at the back of the room who are sniggering at the contents of your speech. Block them out. Think not about what people are thinking of you. Think only of the effect that you’re trying to create on the crowd of the standard working class people, right?

 

So I suppose the second part of the formula in that regard would be to have that mute button from criticism. Don’t actually read the critics or pay any attention to them whatsoever because critics aren’t the masses. The masses aren’t analyzing the contents of your speech like Professors of Political Science or academics and Marxists from the universities. So you don’t need to pay them any attention. Right. They’re not your targets. The people are your targets.

 

And the third one. It may have slipped my mind. Yeah, it may have slipped my mind, but what did I. What did I just mention? Then? The first one, I’m so tired. My memory is failing me.

 

The first one was, believe in what you’re saying. Believe in what you’re saying. The second one is, know your targets. Know who you’re speaking to. And I suppose there was another one I had there as well, but it just slipped my memory. I’m sorry, but these are the these sort of things. That’s it!

 

You have to understand people. You really have to have a good intuitive understanding of people.

 

And I think these three things together, these three things together are what can contribute to making you a better than average speaker.

 

You have to remember what speaking is.

 

At the end of the day. With words we spell. All I’m doing right now is sending out vibrations that mean something to you because we’ve created what we call a language, where we’re able to decipher the meaning of these vibrations, know through receiving them in our ear canals.

 

However, words have a magical effect on people in a number of ways. They can alter a person’s perspective of reality. They can also make them feel and think differently about a certain topic or thing.

 

And so what we’re doing when we speak is we are spelling an audience. We’re actually trying to cast a spell. And that’s the only real magic which exists in addition to symbology, words, symbols, language. This is real magic. Like, I think our understanding of magic through the times have become fables and myths about actual wands and real magical spells. That doesn’t. I don’t believe that exists. I think real magic is something much more palpable and something that we actually don’t recognise as magic on a daily basis. But we’re surrounded by it all of the time. It’s basically anything which is language, which is trying to get you to feel or think in a certain way.

 

So that was besides the original point that I was pivoting from, which was just understanding people, which is not something that you can necessarily always learn. You have to have the intuitive senses. And by that, I mean you have to actually be from the people. You can’t be too far removed from the ordinary worker, which is, I suppose, where I was blessed somewhat, if you want to call it a blessing. Being a public speaker and dissident hasn’t really worked out to my personal advantage.

 

So maybe it’s not a blessing, but I’ve basically got half a normie brain, is what I’m trying to say, which is quite feminine, which allows me to tap into the feeling of people around me. Like I can walk into a room, I can make eye contact with people. I know how they’re feeling, I know what they’re thinking, sort of not word for word, but I’ve got that intuitive sense that’s necessary to understand people on an, on the level that’s required to actually influence them through the spoken word. And it’s something that I don’t know. Like I said, I don’t actually think I’m that good. I’m not as good as I could have been with the right kind of nurturing and education. So there’s, like I said, there’s a lot to unpack. It’s a subject that I’m actually quite interested in. And I did a bit of research in when I was young, but I hope I’ve been articulate in my answer to your question.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re only getting started, Blair, because politics is actually an old man’s game. We’re all quite young. We’re not anywhere near our peak as political actors.

 

Actually, you’re not supposed to really be that influential in politics in your twenties and your thirties.

 

I mean, how many politicians or political leaders can you think of that as young as us when they’re in their peak of influence? I mean, it’s very rare.

 

So we’re all just getting started, actually. A long career ahead of us. We’re kind of stuck with it now. Because once you become a White nationalist, prominent White nationalist, I mean what the fuck else are you going to do?

 

Blair Cottrell: Hitler says you shouldn’t enter into public politics until after 30. Yeah, because before they, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s probably right. Like, if I didn’t say anything and then jumped in, now, people would probably like me a lot more than all the immature shit that I’ve done up to this point.

 

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, you can’t turn back the clock, so you got to stick with it now. But it is good advice. It’s good advice, which I actually ignored because I read that advice.

 

But then I just charged into public politics at 25. I’m like, I’m not waiting five years. I saw an opportunity, I saw an opening, and I went for it, but I sort of generated a reputation.

 

But look, even though I’m generally bad PR for mainstream politicians, no one wants to really have me on their show, their television program. It’s too controversial. You know, it’s Blair Cottrell. The reputation that I did generate is still useful and really amusing in the sense or in regards to the reaction that generates from certain people. Like, you can see all these Leftists on X. Ever since I joined X again, I’ve been having some fun and just dropping comments on posts that appear in my feed here and there. And they’re all like, just arguing about something kind of lightly. And then I show up in the comments and just my name, just my name sets them off. They fall into a hysteria. I can’t believe it’s me. And they just go wild. Any guys they were sort of trying to uphold about being a humanitarian and actually just wanting to be nice and help people is suddenly just dropped. They suddenly drop it and just become absolutely vicious and resort to vicious insults.

 

So just my name has this effect on Leftists where they just like kind of lose control of themselves emotionally and reveal what they actually are, which is just hysterical morons who just actually hate White people and want to see them die. And that’s what comes to the surface just at the sight of my name or just by seeing my face. They lose their minds. And it’s really interesting the effect that I have on people in that regard, just from the reputation that I’ve made.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like left just insults online whenever I get them are always so juvenile. It’s like stuff like:

 

“Oh, your mum should have swallowed or you’re a numpty. Oh, you’re a racist. Oh, what a piece of shit you are. Oh, you, why don’t you suck my dick, you racist?”

 

Like, don’t even say suck my dick. That would be too masculine. They say even gay than that. Like it’s just like the dumbest, like most low rent insults that you’ve ever heard. It’s not even offensive.

 

Blair Cottrell: You, like you want that kind of stuff though, because it demonstrates that the people who oppose you are generally over hysterical, unintelligent morons.

 

Whereas like the way you actually, you don’t really respond to criticism at all!

 

But if you do, you respond to it sort of ironically, playfully and like it’s not bothering you that much. That’s one of the rules of politics, I suppose you could say. But the Left don’t really know how to do that. The Left fall into absolute hysterics and genuine emotionally driven hatred and it makes them look childish and ridiculous every time. And it’s one of the ways we made them so unpopular back in the days of my activism, we would lure them down.

 

Joel Davis: Whenever I talk shit about blacks online, I get all these death threats in my inbox. Like:

 

“Oh, wow, I’m getting a death threat from some black guy from America. I’m so scared!”

 

Like, what are you going to do, faggot? Like, we’re going to fly to Australia and come find where I live. Like, you have, like, 85 IQ. You won’t know where I live. No one knows where I live. But you ain’t finding me. You ain’t coming here. You can’t even have a gun here. Like, what are you gonna do, try and fight me on the street? Like, I’ll probably win? Like, you just like some dumb retard online? Like, you’re not. You’re gonna do that? You’re not gonna do anything!

 

Blair Cottrell: You just said that you do have to be careful, though, having said that, because chances are in your lifetime, someone’s gonna try to stab you, and it’s not even because of politics. It’s not even because of politics. It might just be because you were in wrong place at wrong time.

 

But if you are a White guy, your chances of being stabbed, at least, you know, someone trying to do that a few times in your lifetime, I think they’re actually significantly greater than if you were, like, an Indian or an African or maybe not. Africans are always stabbing each other, so maybe that’s a not true.

 

The point is, you got to be careful and you got to be prepared for people to kind of ambush you. I’m seeing a lot of disturbing videos circulating online, some from England, some from Europe, where people are set upon by groups of migrants, and they’re stabbed. They’re stabbed in places that could easily kill them if they don’t seek immediate medical attention.

 

And I, in my day to day life, take various proclamations just to try to avoid anyone taking advantage of me while my back is turned or while I’m unprepared, because the last thing I want is to have spent 20 years building my body up and increasing my strength, you know, taking pride in myself, only to be, like, stabbed in the back of the neck and killed in 5 seconds. I’d be so devastated by that. Well, I wouldn’t be alive to be devastated, but, you know what I’m saying? I don’t want to. I don’t want my. I don’t want all my training to go to waste. And I want to keep my wits about me for that reason.

 

So, you know, sitting, knowing the exits to where you are, sitting with your back to the wall, keeping your hands up near your face if you can, even if it’s just scratching your chin like you’re pretending to scratch your chin, just to always be semi-prepared. It’s, in my opinion, better than just hoping someone doesn’t try something. Why would you sit with your back to a door not knowing who’s going to come in if you didn’t have to do that?

 

Like if you had the choice of sitting with your back to the wall where you could see the door. It’s stuff like that to me is just common sense. But I suppose all men think about this, or should think about this. Like I said, even if you’re not in politics, even if you’re not someone who’s a known public figure or something, I think it’s just something men should do as just general precaution, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I don’t know if I ever get recognised by Leftists, because if I do, then I have the balls to actually act upon it or do anything about it. Whenever I get recognised in public, it’s always someone who’s sympathetic.

 

In my experience, you might have a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Different experience, but yeah, I’ve been recognised a few times. I’ve only been most of the time when I’m recognised.

 

And I’m not just saying this, it’s just people who want to get photos and shake my hand. There’s a lot of, there was a lot of working class support for our group and our activism back in the day. It was almost like a household name, the United Patriots Front in Australia. And after I got censored, obviously it was difficult to maintain that. It was also a very explosive sudden development. So it’s hard to keep the fire burning with that. So those sort of activist groups as well.

 

But three times I’ve been approached by someone who didn’t appreciate me. The first time was in the northern suburbs of Melbourne while I was at just a Tucker shop getting some food on a lunch break. I was working with some, with a builder, with some labourers at the time, and just an overweight guy who was in the same shop who said that the, he said the people working at the shop shouldn’t have served me because I was a Nazi. And I didn’t really make much of a fuss about it because I just wanted to eat my lunch and go back to work.

 

So that’s what I did. But the second time was interesting. I was on a train coming home from the city again, coming home from work, back to the southeast region, and there was someone on the train looking at me funny. And I sensed that he recognised me. So I kept looking generally in his direction without looking him directly in the eye. And then it’s like finally he realised who I was and he shouted from across the other side of the carriage, I know you’re that fucking racist, Blair Cottrell. And I said:

 

“Yeah, yeah, that’s me.”

 

And he was a Muslim character, a young guy, but like one of those westernised Muslims with sleeve tattoo.

 

So all the tattoos down his arm, his beard was like, trimmed really nicely. So not like a hardcore fundamentalist Muslim. Probably didn’t go to mosque or anything like that, but I don’t know, some kind of Arab dude. And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me, right? But only after I said:

 

“What did I say to him? He started insulting me first after I said:

 

“Yeah, I’m Blair Cottrell, you’re a fucking piece of shit, mate!”

 

Something like that.

 

And I said to him, all I said, this is all I said, I said:

 

“You got to be careful, mate. Just insulting people in public, you don’t know because you know, you can get your jaw broken.”

 

And he goes, are you going to break my jaw? And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me.

 

And so I just didn’t say anything after that. He kept insulting me. He walked a few paces towards me, but no closer. He was probably standing about 15 meters away. And he was bothering some of the other people on the train who were asking him to please be quiet. I was just looking out the window, ignoring him at this point. And the train driver stopped the train. The police were called. He refused to leave the carriage at first until the police came. And the police actually cuffed him and took him off the train.

 

And then when he was on the train station, outside the train, while cuffed, he claimed, he made a statement to police and claimed that I tried to start a fight with him because I was a racist. And that’s what the police officer came into the carriage and told me that he said. And the police officer said:

 

“What? What happened?”

 

And I said:

 

“No comment, mate. Just no comment. I’m just trying to get home from work. No comment.”

 

So I didn’t say anything.

 

And the only reason they let me off and didn’t kind of take me as well, the police, they didn’t take me is because just a couple of random girls, ladies coming home from work, also on the train, stood up for me. They said:

 

“No, he was just sitting there. And this other guy started filming him and swearing at him and screaming at him!”

 

And so the police took the statements from the other people on the train and left. They left me alone and I could go home. I never heard anything else about that.

 

That was the second time.

 

The third time was I was just shopping in a grocery store, local one, actually, for groceries, as one does. And someone was following me. I could sense them at first, and then I turned my head enough so I could see them. See them in the what do you call it, your peripheral vision. And, yeah, I wasn’t sure at first, but then after a while, I was pretty sure because I went down three different aisles, and he’d followed me the whole time. I got to look at the guy. He was average height, overweight, wearing a face covering.

 

But this was during the Covid sort of pandemic saga.

 

So a lot of people wearing face coverings, but his was particularly dirty bandana sort of thing. And he had a baggy, dirty T-shirt on with a picture of I think it was Tupac. But it was something like that, kind of like dreaded hair, like very dirty hair. A White guy, but not a healthy White guy. And he walked past me and I stood aside to move for him eventually because he was starting to get really close to me. And I was almost certain he was following me and I was having a bad day.

 

So this was one of those moments where I reacted the way I would usually react as I moved to let him walk past me. And I just waited until he did. It’s like he kind of realised that I knew he was following me.

 

So he gave up. And he walked right up to me with his bandana on. And he said:

 

“You better watch your back, you fascist cunt!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Fucking what, mate?”

 

So I shoved him, right, because he was right here. He was right in my face. I shoved him hard. He fell over. I took a few steps forward because he was still mouthing off at me, and I shoved him again, bounced off the shelves, and some peanut butter and glasses, like jars of jam fell on top of him. And it was at that moment I realised I shouldn’t have shoved this guy. I shouldn’t have touched him. I think the first shove was okay legally.

 

But then when I stepped forward, like, he got up again, I stepped forward and pushed him over again. And he kind of like sustained some damage by bouncing off the shelves. That’s when I realised I’m probably on camera and I shouldn’t be doing this. It was so difficult, though. All I wanted to do was just execute that guy straight up. I just wanted to break his skull open, man! How dare he follow me and threaten me to my face. I wanted to crush his fucking skull. It was so hard not to.

 

Sorry, I’m getting a bit worked up recalling the memory, but I just walked away and I had a it was a difficult. It was a difficult calm down period. It took about 40 minutes. I usually calm down faster than that, but, yeah, 40 minutes. And then I just didn’t care anymore. And I was laughing about it. But the police came to my door a few days later and they told me they wanted me to make a statement because he’d made a statement. And I said:

 

“No, thank you.”

 

So they left and they came back about three months later and they said:

 

“Look, we’ve reviewed the footage. It’s pretty clear that he was following you and that he antagonised you, however, and we weren’t going to charge you.”

 

They said:

 

“However, the guy has been emailing the commissioner or the assistant commissioner, and we’ve had a directive from high up to charge you with something.”

 

And they just confided this in me, these constables, because they actually didn’t want to serve the papers on me. These constables didn’t want to do it. They were just like, really reluctant and apologetic and explaining the whole situation. They didn’t have to tell me any of this. They said that, quote, unquote, “victim”, the guy who followed me in the supermarket, he emailed the commissioners or some high ranking police bureaucrat. I remember them saying some sort of commissioner, and they had to charge me with something. So they picked the lowest possible assault charge they could find. It was a summary offence called unlawful assault. Summary meaning you don’t need to be on bail for it’s probably just going to be a fine, or a good behaviour Bond or something. And I said:

 

“Right, okay, thank you.”

 

I went to court. What did I get? I think I got a fine for it. And that was it.

 

He didn’t show up to court or anything like that. He’d taken photos of his body and provided them to the police, you know, this noble, “anti-racist, anti-fascist”. There was no actual bad damage. There was just some bruising, I think, but there was no proof that that actually came from the result of that was a result of me pushing him.

 

But, yeah, there’s only three times I’ve been approached, and I suppose I’ve been rambling on for a while about it now. Three times that it was a that it was a negative fashion, you know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ve heard those stories before, but I’m sure the audience enjoyed them. Fellow Comrades said:

 

“Blair seems to ignore the current trending talking points, cuts through them and just speaks his mind.”

 

Well, that’s one thing that I think is refreshing about Blair. He’s always got his own spin on things, which is unique.

 

I also want to mention. So I jumped on this Twitter space the other night. I finished training with the boys, and everyone was talking. I pulled my phone out and I saw there was these libertarian accounts, Australian libertarian accounts, on Twitter. I think John Goddard was the account that was hosting the space with a couple other guys. And the space was called Australian nationalism. And they were kind of presenting themselves like, as if they were spokespeople of Australian nationalism, but they were basically civic nationalists. They were like, well maybe there’s too many immigrants, but as long as you salute the flag and you embrace Australian values or as Aussie as anyone else, like that kind of stuff.

 

And I was like, I got to jump in on this, like, heal what a real nationalist thinks. And another, another account jumped in first, and he was saying some stuff, and they didn’t let me out for a while, but I told the group chats, like comment in this, tell them to let Joel up.

 

Eventually they did, and I had a chat with them and I thought it went pretty well, actually, though, I think I defended the position quite well. And they kind of made, I think they were quite sympathetic, actually, to a lot of the points that I was making. And I was thinking, that’s really good! You don’t get those opportunities a lot in Australian politics to talk to where people that are more towards the centre but on the Right, you have a little bit of a platform, will talk to someone like me or someone like Blair. And whenever that does happen, I think we always handle ourselves very well because our worldview has got a lot going for it.

 

And often the only reason why people haven’t really contended without our ideas that often because they’re so marginalised and repressed and so on, that when they are confronted with them, usually they have very poor counter-arguments and don’t really know how to defend themselves against it, particularly if they style themselves as kind of populist Right-wing, wing Australian patriots or whatever, then it’s especially hard for them to counter our talking points. You have to take the opposite, like Left-wing worldview almost to be able to oppose us properly. So that went quite well. And I’d like to do more things like that. And they were friendly and good natured. And I appreciate that.

 

I think we should always endeavour to have dialogue open with the libertarians and the conservatives and so on as much as possible. And I do believe that our ideas are better than theirs and that in a free and open forum of discourse, we’ll win people over. So I’m thankful to them for being friendly and good sports. But this other guy jumped on, called Reptile Hybrid on Twitter. He’s X.com reptile hybrid. He seems like a conspiracy theorist of some description.

 

And anyway, he jumped on quickly to say that he was enjoying the space.

 

And then he invited me on to do a space with him this Sunday night at 08:00 pm so I agreed to doing it because he’s got like 60,000 followers. He’s got a pretty good platform. He does spaces regularly.

 

And yeah, it’s good, as I said, to talk to these adjacent factions. He jumped on and he said:

 

“Oh because we’re talking about immigration, he said, the people that run the world, they’re trying to replace western populations and it’s on purpose. And whatever they’re called, I don’t, we don’t know what they are. They reptilians? Are they Freemasons?”

 

And I was like:

 

“I know what they are, mate. They’re the jews!”

 

And anyway, so we’ll go and have a chat to a conspiracy theorist about the jews, I guess, and other things.

 

And anyway, he seemed interested to have a conversation, and that’s always good. Uh, whenever, you know, people are open minded and want to have a chat. Oh, you know, that was a really good thing about when I did the streams with Elijah Schaffer or things like, whenever anyone in conservative adjacent wants to talk to us, we should always take those opportunities and try and be friendly to the ones that are friendly to us. So support that stream. It’s reptile underscore hybrid. Hybrid. I will. I don’t really know him, honestly. I don’t really know him from other than that brief two minute interaction. But he seems like a nice guy, so it should be interesting.

 

I’ll post links on social media so you guys can tune in if you want something to listen to on Sunday night 08:00, pm I’ve been jumping on Twitter Spaces more lately. I’m enjoying them again. There was a period where I was jumping on Twitter Spaces all the time, and then I stopped doing them. Organised a few Twitter Spaces a few months ago with some people on Right-wing Twitter that I liked, and I should probably start doing that again because I thought that was good content. But Twitter Spaces are underrated, I think, because they can facilitate conversations where people who maybe wouldn’t be as interested in collaborating with you in a formal way.

 

But if you jump on a Twitter space and they’re on a Twitter space, they’ll have a chat. There was a Twitter space the other day that another nationalist account, Percy Sneedinson, he organised a Twitter space where he. I think he got into an argument with some Marxist on the top on Twitter about immigration and the housing crisis. And then I jumped in on that, and we all just kind of ganged up on this Marxist. It was pretty funny. That kind of shit is fun. Twitter Spaces are unique in that respect.

 

So if you’re not on Twitter, jump on Twitter and so you can follow those Twitter Spaces. I think, Blair, we should probably do a Twitter space actually, one night, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: The audio works really well on Twitter for some reason. Whatever software or programs Twitter uses to record audio through the spaces, it works really well with my microphone, I noticed.

 

But, yeah, I’m more than willing for now. I’ve got to go, though. I’m like, I’m really tired. I’ve got to nearly start with work in the morning, so I’m going to have to let you go. But thanks, everyone, for your questions, for tuning in. Thanks very much to everyone for the Superchats. There was plenty of them this week, and I’m sure that makes Joel grinny smiley happy.

 

But, yeah, I’m out. See you later.

 

Joel Davis: I see, man. Yeah, I’ve got to go through the last couple Superchats here. Hands Rudol. He said another $14.88 Superchat said for. Thanks for the solid milk advice. It was me with the milk questions. I think a few people were asking milk questions.

 

And then also Alt Cuperian said:

 

“I’m seeing a lot of people in my life jump on board with race, realism, friends and family, people in my church. I’m feeling a vibe shift.”

 

Yeah, a lot of people are saying this. It does seem to be a vibe shift, but, yeah, we’ll end the stream there. Thanks for watching. We’ll see you all next week. Something that I’m doing the Twitter space. I will actually probably look into seeing how I can broadcast the show on Twitter as well. And I need to get set up. The GoyimTV guys said I could broadcast there. I want to just try and put the show on as many different platforms as possible.

 

But yeah, I’ll let obviously let you guys know on social media, on Telegram and stuff when I do anything.

 

So if you want more content, keep an eye out for that.

 

But in the meantime, thanks for watching. We’ll see you next week. Goodbye.

 

[3:03:58]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/2/2024 = 62)

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Here is piece on Jewtube, places a pre-Semitic White racial stock was present in the Middle East. The Semites came in much later in history. No the original Hebrews were not White!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp6H0VSvi9Y Aryan Bloodlines of Ancient Babylon – ROBERT SEPEHR
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Good point, Indians are the very example of the result of miscegenation that is Racial Chaos.
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Europeans are simply the best, we are truly a new unique and gifted race that the world envies and our cultural and technological achievements have been adopted by all races. This is being used against us.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Verbose critters, that are loud. “Thank you, come again” Apu from the Simpsons comes to mind.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Jeets are the new proxies of Jewish power. They are being flooded into the West to become the new managerial class to displace the White man. They are corruptible and easily for the Jews to use in their agenda. BTW most other coloured races also hate Indians, there are particularly objectionable in their behaviour , dirty and ugly to boot.
0 likes

masklophobix
6 hours ago
Europeans are descended from Noah’s son Japheth. (After The Flood – Bill Cooper)
0 likes

jvlake
7 hours ago
I work in IT, what Joel said at 21:51 is 100% correct! Sales/project people are usually still white and speak English, but once the contracts are signed it’s Mumbai all the way!
0 likes

ProvingNihil
8 hours ago
Joel I’m the exact same, I never pick up my phone to random phone numbers. Hell I rarely pick it up to anyone I know, can’t stand talking on the phone to begin with.
0 likes

ProvingNihil
10 hours ago
And I’m the same way I stare at non white’s as well, because I don’t trust them or like them.
0 likes

FenrisRagnarok
15 hours ago
*90 minutes of passionate racism later* “I wouldn’t wanna get my bank account closed for hate speech” bruh -.-
0 likes

AntiwokeMMA
15 hours ago
Pajeets are a plague on this Earth. There are enough of those superfluous cunts to ruin every White nation, and their jewish masters know this well.
1 like

Corkly
1 day ago
A Rumbler I shall be, it’s a Rumbler’s life for me. And here at our home on Rumble this do I decree: I wanted to be left alone and enjoy Iron Man. But then wokeness came for my favourite cartoons and movies. Now I see the inevitable battle. We must kill all our enemies, everyone different to us will be executed worldwide. We will have limited government and free market, and return to Christianity. I pledge to not let anything, friend, family or spouse, deter me from my hatred. – The Rumbler’s pledge
1 like

ProvingNihil
1 day ago
Love listening to this while driving, people give me stares haha but I don’t care.
1 like

vigilantejustice23
1 day ago
Sinwar learned Hebrew in prison – would’ve been an interesting topic to touch on. It’s also critical to acknowledge that the reason Js seem so different as a group is because they’re a parasitic organism fundamentally.
0 likes

Buzzerka
1 day ago
I tried to have a talk with you and Barry yesterday on X. I know my X name sounds sus “Bjorn Wartooth” but I’m on probably my 50th account due to being banned so many times. I actually have a real funny story to share. I think you will get kick out of how a friend of mine dealt with a kaffir in South Africa
0 likes

Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
yall are based. Good stuff. Cheers from North Carolina, USA. Lets get our civilization back brothers.
0 likes

Stephanie795
1 day ago
Introverts get drained when socialising for to long. They need to be alone to recharge.
1 like

Se7enius
1 day ago
theres no way blacks are graded above indiansn guys. Get real
0 likes

marv_perplex
1 day ago
Regarding noise pollution, it’s pretty much the same with all brownoids. African, Hispanic, Indian, Arab, etc. cities never sleep. The way they use common areas is just not the same as white westerners.
1 like

Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
I watch this for amusement. Joel the Jew pretending to be Catholic and Blair the meat head trying to be academic. You people sound up to date yet very ignorant!
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
What do you think scares the living fucking shit of them? Thousands and thousands of working class white Australians jointly reading free legal textbooks and rapidly evolving into Constitutional autodidact communities across every municipality in the country. Or 70 dudes dressed like Ninjas on parade. I just told you how to utterly destroy the enemy, I mean absolutely smoke them. Every single thing they’ve done from The Native Titles Act to Drag Queens in public can be held up in legal challenges til the end of fucking time. Get reading and win.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Before anyone says oh but it’s the visuals it’s the visuals. What could be better “visuals”, than a six foot four 30 year bogan called Steve wearing a flanno and Rollin a smoke espousing Section 73 of The Australian Constitution at Frankston Local Court House every time he destroys some Legal Aid dickhead lawyer he wiped the floor with.
1 like

Doubleud40
2 days ago
To Blair’s point about indians intermixing and creating this hybrid race, and this accounting for their deficiencies, this Indian guy just started at my office and lucky for me, picked the seat next to mine as his permanent desk. So aside from his weird smell and ridiculous accent i can’t understand, he has this awful habit of cracking his bones, i say bones cause it’s anything from his fingers, to his neck to his back. Every fucken part of his body cracks for no reason whenever he moves around. Literally sends a shiver down my spine when i hear it. His first day i asked him to stop cracking his knuckles, cause it sounds annoying af every 3 minutes, and then i noticed his entire body cracks and pops constantly, wtf is wrong with his body? He also has zero muscles. It’s almost like he’s just, i don’t know…built different?
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
It isn’t just housing. It is race & therefore culture. Blacks need to be in Africa. Indians need to be in India. They do not need to be housed in White countries. Race matters. Race creates culture. They seem happy to flee from their own shit holes to come leech off of us. Why is that? Because their own people are shit with a shit culture. Why else leave?
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
Blacks in the USA are annoying because they constantly bang on about White supremacy & romanticize shithole Africa for some stupid reason, yet they don’t get the fuck out & move to Africa. Everyone is full of shit.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Same thing here in Australia. You can’t leave your home without being reminded that you’re walking on stolen land from some tribe of nomads that supposedly existed on it for six hundred thousand years or something? So if it is theirs, uh huh, why don’t you give them back your own house you uppity leftists cunt, is what we all want to say. It’s all able to be challenged legally of course but the whites prefer to watch football and do nuffin
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
In terms of people being bad at their jobs for basic services, I can say I noticed a MASSIVE difference in the quality in the USA when certain Grocery stores started hiring negroes from the other side of town instead of white people in our own community. Everything goes to shit. That is a constant problem in the USA. Which is why we tend to have white flight. If we are not going to have forced segregation, then we will have white flight when people try to force integration. The “stay & fight” deal doesn’t work unless you can force these people out. Otherwise, it ends up a mixed shithole that ultimately ends up with white people having to leave if they want a better quality of life. Segregation is the answer. It just needs to be by law. White people need their own countries. It isn’t complicated. It is only complicated when people start making excuses as to why that is bad. I have no problem with those who disagree going to live with shitskins. Just not here.
4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
Until we remove the jew from all facets of our society, this will not stop. The Jew needs to be removed from lobbying, financial institutions, media, ext. We need to fully remove any jewish influence. Then we can work on removing their pawns, or the brownoid invaders.
0 likes

BortSampson
2 days ago
I’m gonna miss Barry Stanton
1 like

EvanL
2 days ago
The welsh language is evidently very similar to Hebrew, so much so that Welshmen can read and understand Hebrew. How’s that for evidence that the anglo-saxons are the true Israelites?
0 likes

ADC789
3 days ago
Mega KEK
0 likes

PhDintheJQ
3 days ago
14卐88
3 likes

TheBrazenCarCharger
3 days ago
The fact that there are more Indians than white people should be enough to say no to Indian immigration
1 like

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Hebrews were white. Jesus was basically proto-Irish. That’s why all the depictions of him are a white guy. Gaelic is similar to Hebrew in many ways. “Lost Tribes” became Celts/picts, Saxons, Goths, Gauls, Visigoths, Nordic/Scandinavians, and possibly Slavs too. In 2024 the ones calling themselves “Jews” are actually Canaanites. Arabs are from Ishmael. Blacks are from Cush. Whites are the line of Isaac and Jacob. Eustace Mullins did a TON of research on this. That’s why the “Jews” killed Christ. He called them the Synagogue of Satan. “Those who say they are Jews but are not, and lie.” It explains basically everything. Eustace Mullins audiobook “The Curse of Canaan” is free on Bitchute.
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
I encourage anyone to check out that audiobook. It will fill your heart with love for your people, purpose, and the knowledge that YHWH actually is real, we actually ARE here for a reason, and we have a distinct enemy that absolutely HATES us specifically. Why else would Jews target only white countries with invasion? It’s clear. They are of Ham and Canaan, Noah’s grandson who sold his birthright for a bowl of soup. And they are jealous of her sons of Isaac – Isaac’s Sons – SAXONS
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
hadefo
3 days ago
comment on mi replies if you’re interested on the thing i said. jesus and the egyptian prophet by lena einhorn is not directly cited in the videos i marked, but it’s relevant too.
0 likes

hadefo
3 days ago
i found that theory reading the work of ralph ellis, a well educated freemason you can find on youtube. he doesn’t say the same as you, directly, but it’s pretty obvious the implications are that the jews were some sort of europeans. look it up. you’ll find it interesting and you’ll find data that’s not outside freemason circles.
0 likes

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Holy fuck. I’m in Texas and if we are getting the “better indians” y’all must be dealing with pure trash
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
hadefo
3 days ago
when they are few, they act polite. but once they are more, they are other story.
1 like

ADC789
3 days ago
Ever been to Fiji
1 like

SpainforSpaniards
3 days ago
#freebarry
2 likes

FLmetalhead
3 days ago
Just got suspended on X and have no idea why. Has anyone had to make a new account? Pisses me off.
1 like

Chingadero
3 days ago
to paraphrase Barry Stanton (who’s account is now suspended on X)- “India could send 1 000 000 people to 200 different country’s. And still have 1.2 Billion people. Let that sink in.”
11 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
BortSampson
2 days ago
Terrifying
1 like

GaiusAlexander
3 days ago
Blair if you want to learn a language jumpspeak is the most natural flowing app I’ve tried.
1 like

Winz0
3 days ago
pajeets are STINKY
6 likes

Lueger
3 days ago
40:14 Sidenote: “Ave Maria” is “Hail [victory] Mary” in Latin. Most people know the Schubert version, but there is a Bach version also.
4 likes

FilisKGB
3 days ago
Joel do something sexier with the hair.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
3 days ago
Fucking creeping us out Bruh. Seriously you’re being watched by tens of thousands per episode, get a stylist on the case.
0 likes

JimboinLA
3 days ago
‘The white race is the most beautiful and interesting.’ Hollywood is going broke because they are trying to deny this and elevate and make the focus about the lesser races. And no one is saying it except a few who are censored.
11 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
Challenge: Blair remain on topic. Difficulty: Impossible.
10 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
I must preserve this Blair quote: “Dissent seven years ago was: Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, preserve our culture, and we stand against the left.” “Dissent now is: Here’s why Hitler was right, racism is natural and good, and leftists aren’t human.”
24 likes

AllegianceMountain
3 days ago
Only non-compromised and fully honest and fully insightful channel on Rumble. Blood of the Numenoreans and Eldar.
1 like

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
15 min based intro, followed by ..ongoing Tip-of-spear investigation of amyloidygenic potentials in P fiz er.. ..based outro; https://rumble.com/v5cgk62-the-block-chain-monad-asymmetric-war-against-bio-digital-convergence-the-bi.html
-1 likes

katana17
3 days ago
[Joel Davis – Wargaming the Response as Communists Organise Brown Parasites – Aug 22, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Joel introduces the show and mention it will cover Australian politics. Discussion of healthcare and hospitals, with Blair saying: “Most people are sitting in hospital because they smoke two packs of cigarettes a day for 25 years, drink every day, eat a lot of sugar, never exercise.” Critique of modern hospitals: “There’s no natural air, there’s no natural light. Um, it’s. There’s just beeping, just constant beeping.” Discussion of working with disadvantaged youth and why it can be demoralizing. “If I’m ugly, if I’m deranged, if I’m twisted, then everyone else needs to be too.” Critique of the medical industry: “The medical industry profits from keeping people sick.” Discussion of eugenics and selective breeding. “We dedicate so much effort to try to breed strong racehorses for the purposes of betting. But when someone mentions the concept of human eugenics and breeding a higher humanity, everybody gets offended.” Talk about incels and sterilizing worldviews. “I assumed that you had to have a license to have children.” Discussion of marriage and the church’s role historically. Introduction of the main topic: protests against refugee encampments. Description of recent nationalist counter-protest: “We did a Nazi rally and we even broke our own rules. We used profanity.” “We want Normie white masses looking at the neo-Nazis and going, ‘Fuck, yeah, that’s what we want!’” Discussion of media coverage and public reaction to their protests. “We have the best grandmas.” Talk about the value of street activism and creating dramatic scenes. Discussion of potential future ….
1 like

Delete
‹ Hide 1 reply
Corndiesel11
Supporter
3 days ago
I thought this was the entire transcript of the last episode
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
The entire transcript, (along with many more transcripts) with images is at the link I gave above and here: https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis: It is The Joel and Blair Show. I’m at a bit of a different background this time because I’m in between places at the moment, and so it’s a bit of an ad hoc setup, but it looks okay, I guess. Gotta hold the mic with my hand, though. I couldn’t find a good resting point for it, so hopefully that works out okay.

 

But anyway. How you doing Blair? You got a haircut?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Hang on. You’re going to hold your microphone the entire time like a news journalist?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I guess it’s good. It’s a little bit of a bicep activation or something, maybe. Solbra [sp] would probably say:

 

“Oh, it’s a good. You need to do, like, weird exercises or something to have a more complete workout.”

 

So this is just another workout. Maybe I should put a dumbbell on the microphone next week and just hold, like a 15 kilo dumbbell attached to it or something. And then eventually I’ll just be, like, so jacked.

 

Blair Cottrell: Impressed as always. I own by your dedication and resourcefulness. Like, if the stream is scheduled, Joel’s doing it no matter where he is and how limited he is. Doesn’t matter. He’ll just hold his microphone if he has to! It’s great!

 

Yeah, I’m doing fine, man. I’m really busy lately. I haven’t really uploaded much content or being that active online because we have our national weightlifting event coming up hosted by Tom and the guys. Same one I injured myself at last year, and so I’m really determined to come back this year and push some big numbers to kind of demonstrate that [I’m] freakishly strong at the moment, and I’ll demonstrate that at this year’s weightlifting event. I’m excited to get up there. I’ve got to travel a bit of distance to get there, so I’m doing some extra work to make sure I can do that comfortably. I think you’ll be going to. Is that right? Joel’s going to be pushing some big numbers as well. I think you’re up there with probably. I reckon you’ll be up there in the top five.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if I’ll make the top five. I’ve been pretty happy with that. But my squat shit, because of my knee injury, that will cost me a little bit.

 

But, yeah, I think my bench and my deadlift are coming along strong every week. The number keeps going up,. So this is the first year I’ve really trained for this. So I’m pretty. I’m kind of kicking myself, to be honest, that I didn’t get into this earlier because then I could maybe be challenging a bit higher up the rankings.

 

But I guess it’ll do my best, set a number and then next year come back and try and smash it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Better late than never, bro. Like you’re into it now and you can only improve from here.

 

It’s been an interesting week. Obviously not as intense or exciting as a presidential candidate being, you know, an attempted assassination on a presidential candidate. And I’ve just done a big leg workout quite intense. I’ve actually been doing less volume, more weights, and I’m really packing on tissue as a result. And it’s got me feeling a bit spaced out.

 

So if I do slur my words or something, know that I’m not retarded, my blood is just drained out of my brain and is currently sitting in my quads. And I’m not as articulate as I usually am when I’m in that state.

 

But the couple of things that I think we should cover this week. Everyone’s really angry about that Australian woman being raped in Paris by Africans, and rightfully. So there’s that, and there’s a couple of other topics I wanted to bring up as well, but are you happy to start with that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. By the way, apparently I had the wrong mic selected. Didn’t tell me that I sounded like shit, so I couldn’t tell.

 

Blair Cottrell: You sound fine to me. Like you’ve got a voice that comes through nice and clear regardless of the mike.

 

Joel Davis: I actually checked the chat for once. Often I ignore it. It was an O7 to the chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: I better do that too, actually. I better keep an eye on the chat because I haven’t been doing that either.

 

But, yeah, this, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the French, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’ve been, … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I got The Noticer article here, but I pulled that up, because you said you don’t know too much about the story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve seen it in newspaper. Like I said, I’ve been really busy with work. Haven’t had a lot of time to really read all the details, but I know it happened and I’ve seen newspaper reports, but I haven’t read The Noticer report. So yeah, let’s have a look at general perspective here.

 

Joel Davis: So here we go:

 

“Australian tourists, 25, gang raped by five Africans in Paris. One attacker followed her into a kebab shop where she took refuge.”

 

Well, the fact that she had to take refuge in a kebab shop probably says something about what part of town she was in. That’s the thing about going to these European cities. You know, the locals there probably know the areas that you’re not supposed to go to the areas that are full of Africans and Arabs and so on.

 

But, you know, this woman obviously was naive. Doesn’t really know Paris. Maybe had an idealistic notion of Paris, a romanticized notion of Paris. Thinks she can just walk around like she can on the streets of the inner city of Melbourne or Sydney. Which isn’t necessarily the safest place in the world, but it’s a lot safer than Paris, and obviously wandered into the wrong neighbourhood.

 

Anyway:

 

“Australian tourist was gang raped by five African men in Paris before fleeing to a kebab shop where one of her attackers followed her inside. The woman, 25, was attacked 03:00 am. Saturday morning near Boulevard de Clichy in the French capital’s 18th arrondissement, (whatever that is) close to the famous Moulin Rouge cabaret just days before the Olympic Games is due to begin. She sought refuge in a nearby kebab shop with her dress on backwards and partially torn, only for one of her rapists to confront her again, CCTV footage from the store obtained by 7 News shows.”

 

I guess the video has been removed by [word unclear]. That’s interesting, actually, that 7 News took the video down, probably because the video., … This was such a big story, everyone, …

 

 

[06:06]

 

Blair Cottrell: It may have been hot linked from YouTube, and YouTube took it down.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It says here that the video has been removed by uploader.

 

So that’s interesting. Like, are they trying to memory hole this because they realised:

 

“Oh, this story’s a little bit too racially charged!”

 

“The footage shows the victim being helped by customers and staff before an African man in black pants and a white T-shirt walks in. According to seven News, she tried to tell locals he was one of the attackers, but they were unable to speak English. As he made an order and lingered in the shop, she was able to alert an English speaker, who confronted the African. He fled the shops just minutes before police arrived.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you watch the, … I sent you the footage of this [word unclear] Did you watch it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I saw it. I didn’t see what you sent me, but I’ve seen it. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Uh, uh. It took a while for anyone to actually register that not only had she been sexually assaulted by a gang of Africans, but one of them was in the shop and had followed her there. Obviously, they weren’t done with her yet.

 

And I think someone in the footage actually took a swing at him, eventually attacked the guy, and the guy ran off just before the police arrived. But, man, it’s really frustrating to watch that footage! You’re in a kebab shop. There’s going to be utensils there. There’s going to be cutlery. You know, there’s opportunities you have there to defend yourself viciously because you’ve been assaulted viciously!

 

So it’s just really frustrating to see the lack of, I don’t know, protective community spirit that no one jumped to her aid. It took a woman to stand up first, and then a guy eventually stood up because he understood that there was a serious problem here. And someone who assaulted her actually followed her into the shop.

 

But he didn’t do enough. Like, he just had a jab. He took a jab at the guy and then let the guy run off. Why didn’t they restrain that guy? Why didn’t they restrain him until the police arrived? Why didn’t they do more? They just let a rapist run away. What the fuck is wrong with these people? What the fuck is going on in Paris! Why can’t an Australian citizen go to Paris without getting raped by gangs of Africans? Well, we know why that is! Because:

 

“Diversity is our greatest strength!”

 

And the government has to let all these people in from incompatible cultures who have no respect for French people or German people or Italians or Australians. Who see them only as targets for sexual assault and whatever else they want to do or feel like doing. I’m really frustrated by this! I’m frustrated by the response that I saw in the front page of Herald Sun News, which is a major Australian newspaper. They’re suggesting that Australian Olympians competing at the Olympics, which I believe is scheduled to be hosted in Paris. Is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re suggesting that Australian Olympians don’t wear the classic Australian green and gold colours. This is what the Australian Olympians who represent our country typically wear.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t the newspaper Blair, it was the actual Olympic Commission that has instructed them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not to wear green and gold because they may be targeted just for being Australians. Because typically, like, even though we have a very pro-multicultural society down here in Australia, most of our athletes are still good stock White people, because they’re the people who are the most athletic, I suppose, and also have access to the best facilities, private schools in Australia. They’re still majority Whites. Our country is still majority White.

 

And so our athletes are majority White and usually the highest of our stock. Because if you’re going to be competing on an international level. You’ve got pretty good genetic stock, generally speaking. And they can’t even wear colours that represent their own national team because they might be targeted by Africans. This is where we’re fucking at! This is where, this is how fucking bad it is! And the Olympic Committee, what’s the Olympic Committee’s response? Not get these people out of the country. Not remigration, mass deportations now, which should be their message:

 

“Oh don’t wear your national colours when competing in our country because you might be raped by Africans! Sorry. That’s just how it is. Part and parcel of living in diverse modern society!”

 

Very frustrating to me, man! Very aggravating! And people have a right to be angry about this. I don’t know who this woman was. I’m slightly angry at the woman too. You’ve got to not be holidaying on your own as a woman.

 

Like, this is a tendency that, …

 

Joel Davis: And going out at night.

 

Blair Cottrell: And at night as well. The world’s not a playground! You know that wanderlust hashtag. And there’s all these movies about girls going and finding themselves in these different countries and going on adventures, discovering themselves! It’s all bullshit! Like, you’re just a victim! You’re just a target for people who want to exploit you. The world’s not a playground. It’s a dangerous place!

 

 

And if you have the perspective that:

 

“Oh, I should be able to go and travel where I want.”

 

Yeah, theoretically, you should be able to buy whatever you want and do whatever you want and live an imagined life of luxury and thrill. But that’s not the way the world actually is so stop treating it like it is. Stop treating the world like a fucking playground! I don’t know. These wanderlust, young, stupid girls! It’s the boomers that put it in their heads a lot of the time, has the message that a lot of boomer parents pumped into the soft heads of their daughters:

 

“Don’t get pregnant early. Don’t worry about traditional standards. Just get a job, get a mortgage. And before you do that, go party up in Eos, do the Greek cruise, sail Croatia, and travel Europe, and drink fancy, colourful cocktails on some beautiful beach somewhere! And do that until you’re 38. Then come back and think about having children!”

 

If your uterus can still you know, generate the power to do it.

 

And a lot of young girls took the advice of their boomer parents, and now that’s what they value. That’s their priority in life, is to go party up in Europe and travel around like it’s a playground. And then get raped by gangs of Africans. It’s so fucking ridiculous, man! The boomers really need to pull their heads. And if you’ve got children, you’ve got to inoculate them against this nonsense and actually raise them to understand that the world is a dangerous place and they need to be prepared for stuff like this to happen.

 

The woman shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have been on her own. I’m not going to say, actually, I won’t go as far to say that she shouldn’t have been there. I mean, you can visit Paris, but she shouldn’t have been on her own out at night. I mean, it’s just, I don’t know. What have you got to say about it, man? I’m just going to end up going on a long, angry rant.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with you. What I said this morning on, I did Mark Collett show this morning, and we discussed this a little bit. And my take was, well, obviously some responsibility has to go to this woman’s father because he obviously wasn’t a protective father who instilled within her a sense of value that she, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Because that’s the thing. Like, there’s a sense of value that I guess can be instilled in a woman that’s feminist, which is kind of perverse, … It’s kind of like her autonomy is where her value is derived. Her freedom, her autonomy, her ability to take care of herself and so on. And that’s what gives you value.

 

But that’s a load of bullshit because as you said, she doesn’t actually have the capability to defend herself in situations like this.

 

So the other kind of value that you can instil in your daughters is the idea that you’re so valuable that you need to be protected, that you deserve protection, that you should seek protection.

 

And when you’re raised with good parents who instil that in you as a woman, then you end up behaving accordingly. I know women that have been raised by more conservative parents who wouldn’t put themselves in that situation because they would be genuinely afraid of that outcome and would just simply make different decisions.

 

So, yeah, it’s obviously a parenting failure, but that’s part of a larger cultural failure, like you said.

 

But also secondarily, it’s also because of the anti-racist ideology perpetuated in our society. People, White people, have mental blocks against assessing these kinds of risks. They have an innate kind of trusting nature. Like when you said:

 

“Oh, well you know why is this woman out at night?”

 

Well, if France was still only full of French people, she probably could go out at night on her own and not get raped. It still probably wouldn’t be advisable, but she probably wouldn’t be getting gang raped by a bunch of White French people, because that’s not how White people operate.

 

So there’s a kind of innate kind of high trust sensibility that White people have, and, then they’ve been kind of psyopped into extending that to out-groups, even though it’s totally illegitimate.

 

And obviously she must have, and all White people must have a certain amount of trepidation or fear response or whatever. They’ve done studies that show when they look at the kind of neurological scanning of, like brain scans, literally, and they’ll show people images of White people, black people, Asians, whatever. And when you get shown an image of someone who is of a different race, a complete different part of your brain lights up, which is associated with the kind of primal fear response, like your lizard brain lights up. And this has been reproduced by multiple studies. So, you know, there is a certain innate kind of:

 

“Oh, this isn’t a safe neighbourhood!”

 

But then you have this overriding self talk that has been instilled in White people that:

 

“Well, that would be racist to acknowledge that feeling.”

 

And so it gets repressed.

 

So then the internal psychological resources that have been given to this woman by, and all of us, by evolution aren’t activated, which are there to defend yourself against out-groups. And then shit like this happens.

 

Obviously it’s a multifaceted problem. It just demonstrates the it’s an example, or a manifestation of a lot of the main ideological problems in our society, like the individualism, the feminism, the anti-racism. I mean, why the hell are there even a whole bunch of niggers in Paris, anyway? There shouldn’t be! It makes no sense that they’re there.

 

So, yeah, it’s just a failure on so many levels.

 

I mean, they shouldn’t be having the Olympics in Paris. It’s basically a third world city. We see so many reports, there was massive race riots there last year.

 

There’s been so many terrorist attacks by Muslims. It’s one of the worst cities in the world for pickpocketing, and it’s just an absolute nightmare! Everyone that I know that has been to Paris only has negative stories. I’ve never heard any story from anyone except from a boomer that went there in like, the 1960s, who has a positive Paris holiday story. Every single person I’ve ever spoken to that’s been there has a negative story, and just rants about it. And it ends up just being a conversation about how it’s been ruined by mass immigration.

 

[16:46]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember that Japanese tourists who went to Paris and expected to see French people, but just saw mostly Africans and Arab people and was like:

 

“What the hell? Like, I came on a vacation to Paris because I wanted to see Paris. This is not what I expected.”

 

That was kind of a viral video about five or six years ago. So it’s obviously been this way for a while. But I just want revenge, man!

 

I mean, this is close to home. This is an Australian woman and I just want revenge. I’m just so dissatisfied with the result that the guy was allowed to just run away. And what’s akin to rape? Like, what’s, you know how do you deal justice in a situation like that? I don’t know, man. I’ve just got my imaginations running wild and I feel vengeful about it. I don’t know the woman, but she’s Australian. And so for that reason I just feel so torn up inside about it.

 

So, yeah, it’s very unfortunate you gotta tolerate shit like this in this fucking society, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it shouldn’t be tolerated. Like, we should demand nigger scalps from the French as restitution.

 

But, yeah, it’s a pretty horrific story. It’s quite an obvious take in response. Blank Actual said:

 

“France needs a revolution.”

 

Well, that’s one thing that the French have always been pretty good at doing, is revolutions, so why not another one?:

 

“Diversity is up rated stench with a poo emoji.”

 

What were you saying?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a saying:

 

“That the whiff of grapeshot has prevented any revolutionary spirit in the French people ever since that particular incident.”

 

And grapeshot is when Napoleon fired broken up cannonballs, which have a shotgun type effect. Like, imagine a row of giant shotguns is blowing people apart because after the first, the new revolutionary government took power, the people were very offended because the regular people thought they were going to come to power. That didn’t happen, of course.

 

And so there was a bit of a counter revolutionary effort. And Napoleon was given the task of quelling that counter revolution, and he did it with grapeshot. And I don’t think there was a significant case of any French rebellion against the government since then. But we’re starting to see it now, definitely. I’m sure there’s French nationalists that are active and I’m sure they’re busy.

 

So I don’t want to take anything away from the French. As I said I’m very angry about an Australian citizen being raped by Africans in Paris. Just, I won’t harp on about it, though. I think we’ve almost said enough about it. Unless you’ve got more thoughts.

 

Joel Davis: No, think it does bridge, though, to a larger theme. Which is, when would enough be enough? Like how many of these stories do we have to hear?

 

And even in South Africa there are still White Leftists.

 

So the view that I take on this subject is that basically there is no amount of tragic or brutal outcomes that will eventually fill up the meter of what White people can tolerate before they respond. I think the only way enough will be enough is if we actually build a counterforce, a movement that people can believe in, that can make them believe that there is an alternative.

 

I think basically now most people have just kind of accepted and become accustomed to this being the reality of Western society, that you’re just going to have this massive violent, particularly in Europe, immigrant population, that you’re going to have all the other problems associated with mass immigration. And it just is what it is. Most White people are not happy about it, but they have a kind of learnt helplessness.

 

And moreover, I think from an evolutionary biology perspective, I think the vast majority of people have kind of been selected with a lot of pro-social traits that make them trusting, that make them forgiving, accepting of others and so on. Which are good traits on an interpersonal level. Like the kind of traits that make you a good person to work with or be neighbours with or be friends with or in a family with, are not the same kind of traits that make you good at analyzing threats on a political level and coming bringing the right attitude towards politics.

 

And this is kind of, I think the problem with democracy, or one of the main problems with democracy is that the average person just doesn’t have the correct psychological constitution to be able to see politics clearly.

 

[21:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re taught that everyone’s their friend, like people in, under democracy, it’s everyone’s your friend, treat everyone like a friend. But that’s not how other people are seeing you. Especially people who aren’t from your country. Not everyone is your friend. People are trying to exploit you, people are trying to take advantage of you, and you have to go through life with that perspective. Not all of the time. You be kind to people as much as you can be because I think that’s reciprocal. If you’re kind to people are kind to you, generally speaking.

 

But, yeah, I definitely don’t go through life thinking everyone’s my friend and believing in some universal human equality, because it’s bullshit! It’s just that’s not reality of the world we live in. It’s not the reality of human beings and all of the races that we sum up under the phrase “humanity”. I actually don’t even like the phrase “humanity” because, or for the exact reason I just outlined it. It just categorizes too many different, radically different types of people under one phrase. I think that’s why egalitarians coined the phrase humanity and love to use the phrase “human being” or “us”. Everything’s about “us”. But that’s not the way all these other races and nations in the world see us, see White people or Westerners. A lot of them think we’re idiots, actually.

 

I was given a book recently by a colleague. I forgot the name of it. I think it’s called something like How the Rest Fight the West. And it’s a modern interpretation by a former soldier, I think a high ranking soldier, as to how other nations currently view the West and their understanding of how to sort of gain advantage over the West in certain social, political situations. So that’ll be a good read. I’ll look it up now, actually, so I can get more information to you guys on that book.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, I think it isn’t just what democracy teaches people. It’s a democracy empowers people that don’t really have any business making political decisions. Like, for the vast majority of human history, up until very recently, the average pleb, the peasant, wasn’t involved in political decision making in any meaningful capacity. There is, I think in order to have a sound political mentality, you have to be somewhat anti-social. You have to be able to look at the world through a dog-eat-dog lens, analyze the world dispassionately and rationally in terms of threats, in terms of the potential for violence, the potential for conflict, and ensuring self preservation.

 

And if you have this mentality in your daily life, you might be a bit of an asshole! You might not be the most considerate and caring and forgiving person. Being really considerate and caring and forgiving is great on an interpersonal level. That’s how you should be within a community, if you have a community of White people all taking care of each other, or a family, or a friendship group, those are the traits that actually hold the group together. But on a larger political scale, those traits, if they take over the society, end up basically weakening it and opening it up and exposing it to a lot of these threats, and democracy opens that up.

 

Whereas if you have a society where you have a kind of selection mechanism to bring people with a more anti-social, dog-eat-dog world mentality, select them up the hierarchy into positions of power and influence, that they can make political decisions that ensure the preservation of the race, of the nation and its interests. And the rest of the masses are able to basically be wholesome chungus. They’re able to be caring and altruistic and so on, because it won’t impact politics. They’ll just be like that in their everyday life and produce the optimal society.

 

And I think that’s basically what European society was when we had more of an aristocratic government. And as that has been whittled away, I think we’ve gone in the complete wrong direction. We’ve had more and more egalitarianism.

 

Obviously, there’s more to the story than that because we had mass democracy in Australia or in other countries prior to the Second World War, and we still had White nationalism. Obviously, Hitler was voted into power and so on.

 

So there is the capacity for democracies to function better than the current one that we have. This spectre of the Second World War and the way in which academia and media institutions have been captured by our racial enemies who have then propagated an anti-racist ideology throughout our society. And that obviously can’t be negated.

 

But I think the masses are susceptible to that message because it plays upon these emotional triggers. And those of us who aren’t susceptible to it, maybe there’s, on a certain level, something slightly wrong with us. Like a lot of people pathologise the far-Right and say:

 

“Oh, the far-Right. You know, they’re psychotic! They’re narcissistic!”

 

They kind of portray us as like pathological in some way because we have maybe a certain amount of anti-social aggression. But that enables us probably to see clearly a lot of these political issues.

 

So, yeah, I think the kind of brutality of my mindset probably turns a lot of people off. But the brutality of my mindset or your mindset or whatever is the what is necessary to actually protect the functional society.

 

[27:03]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it’s important to cancel some of that receptivity. Australian people, American people, European people have to subversive hostile influence, by making certain things illegal or not tolerated on a government and social level.

 

For example, you’re coming over here selling transgenderism and setting up clinics for sex changes. That’s illegal! You’re going to jail! You can either leave the country or go to jail. Same is true with pornography or something like that. You’re coming over here with some new type of extreme porn that you’re trying to pedal to the Australian masses. Ban! Illegal! Go to jail!

 

There needs to be clear stops against efforts to subvert and undermine the social fabric of Australian culture, or what Australian culture once was. It has been subverted and undermined as a result of the people being taught to be receptive, or our entire country being receptive to outside influence that was hostile from the beginning.

 

And what sets us apart from ordinary people, as you say, isn’t that there’s something wrong with us. It’s just that we’re able to recognise social and psychological threats. Not every message, not every book, not every show is just completely passive and exists for the purposes of entertainment. They exist to influence, often in a hostile fashion, for very special, specific (((interested groups))), which often aren’t even Australian, as we know. Right?

 

So the only real thing that sets me apart, I think, is I’m able to recognise threats and hostile influence. I’m not going to be receptive to messages about transgenderism, or feminism or anything that’s, like, in the realm of atheism and nihilism. I understand that these things are peddled deliberately to attack spiritually, socially, psychologically, us as a people, our nation!

 

And it’s been this way since the beginning. That’s why I think hostile forces to Australia have laughed at our Democratic principles, understanding that it makes us receptive to hostile influence. If you’re stupid enough to allow everything, then you won’t really have a nation or civilisation eventually. Something, some cancer, is going to grow. Think of your country or nation like an organism, right? Like a human body. The body has an immune system and it’s intolerant of certain bacterial infections and viruses. It doesn’t allow these things, it’s not receptive to these things, it fights these things.

 

And we as a nation, we have to do the same thing. We have to have boundaries and rules where certain influence, certain external bacteria that’s going to do damage to our national organism is not allowed to come in the first place. And if it does, it’s fought and attacked until it’s destroyed! It’s simple stuff, man, really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. I talked to you about this a little bit the other day when we had lunch. I think Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory is quite interesting and pertinent to this discussion. So for some background, Jonathan Haidt is, I think he’s like a part jewish social psychologist, researcher. And his research is interesting because he is a liberal and he kind of set out to analyze, … So he’s a moral intuitionist. In other words, he believes that people don’t really reason their way to their moral judgements, but they have a set of moral intuitions that they reason from.

 

And so people have a certain kind of psychological instinctive predisposition to come to certain moral judgements, and then they just find the reasons that fit with those fundamental intuitions. And I agree that’s true. I think that’s how people operate. Which explains why ethical arguments are never done, are always just kind of people clashing over having different fundamental intuitions. They’re never really like technical arguments that people can reason towards some kind of agreement upon.

 

But anyway, what he ended up finding was that conservatives are actually morally balanced. And liberals, or Leftists, obviously they call Leftist liberals in America, are morally unbalanced, which is probably for him a counterintuitive judgement. That’s what makes the research interesting.

 

And basically he identified five core moral foundations. Three of them you could say are collectivist, and two of them you could say are individualist, although they might appear collectivist. But I disagree.

 

So the two that are individualist and these are the only two that Leftists generally care about are harm avoidance and equality. And I say these are individualist because equality and harm avoidance, they might seem like they are altruistic. Like:

 

“Oh, you want everyone to be equal, you want everyone to be included. You don’t want anyone to get hurt.”

 

But if you’re weak, or if you’re not capable of ascending the hierarchy to a prominent position within a hierarchical social model, which is the majority of people, then equality and harm avoidance, as universal principles, are in your personal self interest. And you can actually present your personal self interest like it’s altruistic through signaling towards those values. If you’re afraid of engaging in violence or competing in hierarchies, it’s the perfect ideology for you. And that’s why it’s so ubiquitous.

 

And that’s why we see Leftists or Leftism has a very large correlation with physical weakness, with a whole series of like low testosterone and a whole other series of negative traits. Conservatives on average are better looking, particularly the women. Right-wing women are much better looking than Left-wing women. That’s been like, scientifically proven through a series of studies, obviously, on average. And Leftism also correlates with a whole series of mental illnesses. Right-wingers, generally speaking, have way less clinical diagnoses of basically every kind of mental illness. So Left-wingers are kind of just mentally and physically less healthy.

 

But anyway, the point is that they have like a two stroke morality. They only care about those things. Where conservatives generally care about those things. But they’re balanced out with three other values, which he defined as sanctity, loyalty to the in-group, and respect for authority.

 

Sanctity basically being like respect for traditions and, just kind of the customs of the group and so on.

 

So you can see how sanctity, loyalty and authority, these things are all groupish traits that kind of hold together the cohesion of the group. And Leftist’s just forsake all of these things, which is why they have no regard for tradition, they have no regard for custom. They have no regard for in-group loyalty. They’re often, they’re basically traitors to the in-group.

 

[33:36]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re powered by a hatred which really invigorates them. Hatred can be a really powerful motivator, and it actually doesn’t matter. Like the dominance of the Left in the institutions demonstrates that with enough leverage, a specific philosophical group, or a group pertaining or holding to one idea, in this case, you know, Leftist liberalism, it doesn’t actually matter how respectful or fundamentally correct that group is. They just need to hate!

 

And then they need to have the brutal us versus them dynamic, the black and white perspective, and they need to hold to it like a Christian’s holding to his church faith, or a Muslim is holding to their mosque faith. They need to believe that much in whatever it is that they’re parroting. And they’ll eventually rise to prominence and have a lot of influence in those institutions.

 

So I think it’s being demonstrated through Leftism that it’s like brutality and hatred that actually gets you power in politics. It’s not being fair and respectful.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. But for Leftists, it’s always brutality in defense of equality and harm avoidance, the kind of Drew Pavlou:

 

“All people are equal. You want to kill millions of people!”

 

That’s basically Leftism in a nutshell. That’s basically what it is. That’s the two main moral intuitions. Anyone who disagrees with that is a threat to them. Because if you’re, as I said, physically weak and physically unhealthy and you lack, in certain areas, a society that is hierarchically structured and where violence actually can exist, where you don’t have a guarantee of peace, where you can run your mouth and say whatever you want is a threat. It’s something that really undermines a social position.

 

But I would say that someone who is far-Right, and I think there’s some evidence to support this as well, is someone who basically has those three values that conservatives also have, sanctity, loyalty and respect for authority, but cares less about, equality and harm avoidance.

 

And so therefore, someone who is far-Right is someone who has a purely groupish morality, someone who is willing to basically face a society that [can] face violence, face force and face hierarchy, be subjected to the test of violence and hierarchy, because someone who is far-Right knows that ultimately that is what’s necessary to strengthen the group and to maximize the strength of the group.

 

So being far-Right, it’s actually the most purely selfless and the most collectivist of all the moral intuitions or moral points of view. I would say, therefore, it demonstrates that we’re actually the noble element in all of this. Conservatives have a noble element, but it’s kind of balanced out. They’re kind of like centrists that have a balancing between us and Leftists, which makes sense. And Leftists are just purely kind of like spiteful individualists that are willing to basically destroy the cohesion of the group and destroy the strength of the group in order to maximize their own personal self interest and protections and advantages and privileges. So under like a false moral pretence.

 

So I would say, like in response to all of these issues, I think the primary reason, I guess, why we’re facing the problems that we’re facing is because our morality has been pathologised. You know, we are seen as kind of scary. We’re seen as brutal because we have no regard for equality or harm avoidance. And if you’re a kind of a weak person, you’re afraid, or you just kind of, just generally don’t have the minerals, you’re afraid of the kind of brutality perhaps, of us enacting our moral vision. You’re afraid of the tough love!

 

And so my view, it’s just the nothing is going to really improve until people of our persuasion can build up a power base where we can seem like a necessary corrective, where society gets so bad and we can rise and become strong enough, where people say:

 

“Well, we have to turn to the far-Right. We have to turn to the bad boys to restore order because look at what a mess everything has descended into.”

 

So we need to become credible enough to be able to provide an alternative.

 

But at the same time, everything has to., … It’s not just that things will get worse and then people will become Nazis or something. I think Nazis have to become strong in addition to everything getting worse. And that’s when the Whiteman will eventually turn to us as a solution.

 

Like, if you look at 1930s Germany, you had the crisis of the Great Depression and all the problems with the Weimar Republic, but you also had a massive movement that showed strength and vitality and power that people could then turn to secure themselves.

 

So I think that’s ultimately the problem. It’s not just we’ve got the social conditions degrading that are necessary for the far-Right to rise, but the far-Right is not able to basically power through into a position of a genuine alternative. And it’s mostly because so much of the movement is preoccupied with, rather than just simply showing strength, building strength and exhibiting strength, they’re obsessed with trying to get our mentality to be translated into the moral values of conservatives or the moral values of Leftists even, and warp the language and warp the presentation and have the right kind of clean optics that makes our ideas more agreeable.

 

And I don’t think that can ever work, because ultimately what that is a form of acquiescence to the sensibilities of our opponents. I think the only way in which we can actually provide a credible challenge to the system is by tripling down upon our own morality, our own perspective, and just building up strength within our own perspective to the point where we seem like a powerful enough horse that could actually be backed, because we can credibly actually challenge for power.

 

So I think strength is all that really matters in politics.

 

You said that about Joe Biden the other day, that there’s one rule in politics, “don’t appear weak”. He broke that rule. That’s why he’s out. I think that was so true. I think ultimately, politics really comes down to, it’s ultimately a gang fight, at the end of the day.

 

[40:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Because people vote like a woman choosing a mate, a woman choosing a leader. People are feminine, and so they’re responsive to strength. And I don’t necessarily mean, you know, brutality or violence when I say strength. I just mean you know, stoicism, being above pettiness, holding yourself with confidence, you know, et cetera, et cetera. All of these things are very important. Putin’s very good at understanding this. That’s why he’s been in power so long in Russia.

 

You spoke of harm avoidance, and I realised there’s a quality that probably comes from our ethnicity or some sort of spiritual realm, if you’re into that kind of stuff. And it’s the romanticisation, I suppose you could call it, of harm avoidance. Like, I romanticize lack of harm avoidance is what I’m trying to say, meaning, like, enduring harm for the sake of something greater. It’s kind of the bread and butter of human romance for me.

 

Joel Davis: That’s bravery.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I wonder if that’s being used against us, wonder if our enemies understand that we’re willing to put ourselves in harm’s way, a minority of us anyway, and that might be understood and used against us somehow. I haven’t thought enough about it. But I do know that I romanticize having no harm avoidance. Well, I don’t have no harm avoidance. I have some harm avoidance. Obviously, I want to stay alive. But my past history in politics and activism shows that I’m willing to endure harm for the sake of what I believe, years of it.

 

And like I said, that’s a romantic thing for me. I think that’s something that every man should have. I don’t really understand men who don’t have that compulsion, but how that could be used against us could be interesting to explore in the future.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I was listening to a audiobook by Thomas Carlisle, who was a really famous. I don’t know whether you would call him a pure historian, but he’s kind of like a philosopher of history. He’s English, from the 19th century, and he was a romanticist. And in the first part, because he kind of has a heroic conception of history, history understood through the narrative of great men. Great men move history, according to Carlisle.

 

So it’s like the complete opposite of Marxism. You know, Marxism is a theory of history where classes and structural forces move history. And what individuals do doesn’t really matter because everything is subject to the dialectic of material relations between economic classes or whatever. And Carlyle is the complete antithesis. Carlyle is like:

 

“No! History is moved by great individuals, noble, heroic individuals, challenging epochs, challenging paradigms, and dragging civilisations, nations and civilisations into new realities.”

 

Anyway, Carlyle begins by talking about Germanic Paganism. And it’s quite an interesting discussion. And in his discussion of what is at the core, it’s the core value, ultimately, of Germanic or Norse Paganism or traditional Anglo Saxon Paganism. He just talks about how the ultimate virtue is bravery. You know, like the you go to Valhalla because you are a brave man. Odin sends his valkyries to collect brave souls after death, dying on battlefield, dying with valour, dying with honour. So that really is something that is at the core of our people’s ethos in some kind of essential way, that romanticism of bravery as the highest virtue that you just mentioned.

 

So I definitely agree. I agree with that in terms of how that’s weaponised against us, as you said. Yeah, that could be an interesting discussion. I’d have to think about that some more. Do you want to say something in response to that, or do you want to move on to another story?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think what’s on my mind now is the revelation made by Elon Musk in a Jordan Peterson interview that his eldest son in 2019, when his son Xavier was around about 18 years old, I think, became officially transgender, changed their name to Vivian. And Musk’s former wife. I’m assuming it’s his former wife, and the mother of Xavier conned Elon into signing a document which basically gave his permission for his son to start taking puberty blockers. I don’t know why permission was needed at 18. Maybe you can’t do it until 21 in America or wherever it is they are. But I thought that was a huge revelation for him to make publicly, and he’s kept that quiet since 2019. That’s, like, five years ago now.

 

And you can see how that’s probably influenced his activity in the past five years because he was really upset about it. His exact words were, and I found this really profound, that “my son is dead”. He said his son is dead. And what he means is Xavier, the boy he helped to raise, no longer exists. In the place of Xavier, there is this drug addicted, deluded Vivian.

 

And the image that came into my mind, you know how in that horror universe, Alien, where there’s those, like, facehuggers and they lay an egg inside you, I saw the transgender influence of being the facehugger that latched itself onto the face of this boy, Elon’s son, and laid this egg of twisted ideology and perspective inside of him. And then bursting forth from his carcass was Vivian! This new transgender character, you know, made possible through drugs.

 

But, it’s not really transgenderism, is it? Because I don’t actually believe that transgender is a thing. I’ve said it before. I think that as transvestites, I think that it’s drug addicted transvestites. Meaning they’re taking drugs that confuse them, change their hormones around a little bit, but not enough to actually biologically change them, because that’s not possible. And they dress up like the other sex.

 

[46:06]

 

So we’re not talking about transgenderism. There is no transgenderism. There’s just drug addicted transvestites. That’s all they are. And now that’s what Elon Musk’s son is. And his exact words, as I said, were:

 

“My son is dead! Killed by the woke mine virus!”

 

And he said to Peterson in this interview:

 

“Since then, I vowed to destroy the woke mine virus!”

 

And that’s pretty profound stuff. I actually did a little bit of research on who Elon Musk is, where he comes from, and a little bit learnt a little bit about his personality after that.

 

And I think he’s a guy who’s a lot more sensitive than most people who become very powerful in the realm of finance and business. He doesn’t seem to be like everyone else who gets, … I’m not blowing smoke up his arse or anything like that.

 

I mean, the guy’s really vehemently pro-Israel, and we’ll get into that a little bit, too, so we’ll discuss how that ties into the changing political landscape. But I just thought it was really profound that he came out with this. He revealed this about his personal family, his life. And the way he explained it, I think, was perfect. That when a child, or a young person becomes, quote, unquote, “transgender”, goes down that trajectory of drug abuse, hormone blockers, which Elon Musk describes as simply “sterilisation drugs”. And he said it wasn’t explained to him that that’s what they were when he signed the document allowing his son to take these drugs at the request of his former wife, too. Sorry. I know I’m pivoting from the point I was just closing with there, but I want to add this in, because this has been my perspective.

 

Isn’t it interesting that it’s always the fucking women pushing for children to be taking puberty blockers and transgender drugs to try to make them into another sex! Basically killing off their child and having this thing be born from its dead carcass that doesn’t understand what it is, and then, you know, is basically just addicted to drugs and its own delusions. It’s weird because women are supposed to be the caregivers, so why are women doing this to their children? I don’t know.

 

I guess we can get into that a little bit, too, and try to understand the psychology of these White women, who are mutilating their children for some fucking reason! I mean, is it all just for likes and attention on Instagram or Facebook? Is it all just to feel like they’re good people because they’re giving their child what they think they what the child thinks it wants, but really it’s not what the child wants. It’s just a result of how the child’s been influenced by decadent culture? I don’t know. What are your thoughts, Mr Davis?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you open up a lot of interesting topics with that. I mean, first of all, I would say that Elon’s remarks I found to be a little bit befuddling because I also saw him say on Twitter about this, that:

 

“Oh, well, my son was just a homosexual.”

 

And then these doctors convinced him that to this transgender nonsense!

 

And so if your son is a homosexual, well, then he’s basically dead, also.

 

I mean, the genetic line is done at that point,. So I’m not saying that:

 

“Well, what’s the difference?”

 

Obviously, transgenderism is even worse! But I know at that point, like, when you have a homosexual son, it’s basically over anyway.

 

So the fact that he’s kind of fine with that, but not fine with transgenderism, I didn’t think actually made any sense:

 

“Oh, he’s been sterilised!”

 

It’s like, yeah, but he was going to have sodomy instead of sex with a woman anyway, so he’s already sterilised by his own homosexuality. So I thought that was a little incoherent, but yeah.

 

Second of all, you know, Elon Musk you mentioned his celebration of Israel, his sycophantic love of Israel that has come about over the last year in a very explicit way, all of a sudden. He seemed to be like last year he seemed to almost be leaning in our direction and criticising the jews in a kind of in a soft core way. And it was quite interesting. And then he snapped back into a kind of very rigid pro-jewish stance after that.

 

Netanyahu just travelled to Washington, DC to give a speech, you know, early this morning, Australian time, and Elon Musk personally went to the Congress to go and see the speech.

 

And I remember when he did get in trouble, originally from the jews for basically criticising them. And in a certain way on Twitter. He went and he went to Auschwitz, and he was on a stage with Ben Shapiro and just did all of these, you know, really good goy, shabbos goy kind of signaling activities to re ingratiate himself with the jews. And he was on the stage sitting next to Ben Shapiro, and Elon Musk said something to the effect of:

 

“I’m not a jew, but I’m jew-ish.”

 

Implying that he must have some jewish ancestry or something. I know that one of the women that he has had children with has jewish ancestry, at least, in addition to that.

 

So, anyway, the point is, if you’re really so upset about transgenderism, well, why don’t you do a little bit of a trace and see where the hell did this transgenderism come from? And it’s one of those every single time moments. You trace it right back to jews! Whether we want to go back to the Weimar Republic and the jewish doctors that invented it, quote, unquote, “doctors, sexologists”, quote, unquote, “that invented it”, the pervert freaks that invented it.

 

But also in its modern or more contemporary iteration, it has been pushed in the United States by, particularly the Pritzker family, which are one of the billionaire jewish families, really influential in American politics, particularly in the Democrat party. They’ve been one of the biggest backers of transgenderism, as have many other jewish organisations and interests. So, it’s basically the “woke mind virus”, so to speak, is a “jewish mind virus”.

 

[52:16]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the Nazis in Germany, as they were coming to power, burned down the world’s first transgender clinic. I saw a story on that years ago. I can’t remember all the details, but I thought that was significant.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When they were doing the book burnings, they were basically burning books. They were probably burning some communist books, but they were burning a lot of this kind of gender ideology stuff that was being spread in the Weimar Rebublic.

 

Blair Cottrell: There was actually a clinic, though. It was like the first ever clinic for actually trying to change men into women or vice versa. And that entire building was burned down by the Nazis back in the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And anyway, so I thought that was interesting, that he apparently is going to war against the work mind virus, but he’s fine with homosexuality and he’s fine with jews. It’s like this doesn’t really seem that coherent.

 

But anyway, those are a few of my initial thoughts. In addition, when you mentioned that his ex-wife, … He has many ex-wives and women that he’s had children with, and it just really exposes the stupidity of that breeding strategy, where instead of picking one quality woman that has the Right psychological constitution, he’s got this philosophy of, let’s just have as many kids as possible. I’m a billionaire, so I can afford to just, basically pay infinite child support. And so he’s knocked up a whole bunch of women.

 

But you know, this woman is transing his kid. I remember Grimes, one of the other women that he’s had children with, also made pro-transgender comments and so on, refusing, I think, when they had a kid, she was saying something how she refused to basically give it a gender, gender pronouns or something when it was a baby, and they had like, a kind of public spat over it on Twitter back in the day. I remember seeing something like that years ago.

 

So he keeps picking these really horrible women that are obviously themselves mentally unwell, which probably indicates, … I’ve been reading this book by Edward Dutton recently that was just released by Imperium Press called Woke Eugenics, where Edward Dutton advances this thesis that because in industrial society, infant mortality has fallen from almost 50% to 1%. Previously, before the industrial revolution, babies that had high mutational load, because even if you have two genetically healthy parents, if they have enough kids, eventually one will be a mutant. Because that’s just kind of how it works. The combination is just keep iterating. Eventually you get, like a mutant baby. Well, in pre-industrial Europe, that baby would probably wouldn’t survive the first year or two of its life, because it would just mutate. It would just get sick and die.

 

But with modern Medicine, we can keep those babies alive and then enable them to breathe and so on and so genetic mutations have spread rapidly through the White population. And then Dutton then points out a whole bunch of research that links all these different correlates of Left-wing political belief with genetic mutation, particularly coming to things like mental illness.

 

And then he posits that the wokeness, in a certain sense, is the genetic trash taking itself out, that it’s this kind of evolutionary mechanism whereby the mutant Leftists develop a series of memes that prevent them from passing on their genes to further generations. They take themselves back out of the gene pool so that only the more healthy, conservative and Right-wing people breed. And all these mutant bloodlines just kind of eviscerate themselves to kind of restrengthen the race.

 

And it’s an interesting idea, and that’s probably an example. We say, what are these insane women doing with the abortion and transing the kids and I and raising their kids to not have a gender identity and so on? What is this all about? Encouraging their daughters to not have children young and go and get a career? And what are all these behaviours about or delaying childbirth until very late?

 

Ultimately, what all these behaviours sum total to is basically not passing on their genes, more or less. There’s a decent amount of heritability in traits that predispose you to Left-wing political belief. So kind of like wokeness is like the trash taking itself out, basically. It’s just like all the genetic trash of the White race, like throwing itself into an oblivion.

 

And so that’s why you have to be very careful which woman you select.

 

Because if you have children with a woman that is psychologically Leftist or really psychologically unwell. And I know people could say all women are crazy, but no, there’s a difference between a normal kind of feminine crazy, which is just feminine hormones and so on, and like abortions, transing the kids crazy! And just complete lack of maternal instinct. Maternal instinct is supposed to be life affirming and life giving. It’s supposed to be fundamentally about nurturing the children and putting them in a position where they can then breed successfully and so on down the generation. It’s supposed to be enriching and protecting the bloodline so that it continues.

 

But this you know, this kind of Left-wing femininity is the complete opposite. It’s like this kind of self destructive tendency. If you breed with that doesn’t matter if you have eight kids and you’ve got all this money, your bloodlines are still on a trajectory towards oblivion, whether it be through all these different methods, sexual perversion or just nihilistic delaying of breeding to the point where you run past the window, you run out the clock, or outbreeding with other races or whatever.

 

And so then what’s the point? It’s much better to just pick one actually mentally healthy woman and make it work with her and actually have some kids that will end up just being normal and having normal families themselves and so on. So that there’s still, in his case, little Musks running around in a thousand years. Otherwise, what was this all for?

 

So I think that really shows the kind of perversity of his mindset.

 

[58:47]

Blair Cottrell: What about the mindset of the women who do this to their children? Any thoughts on that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, obviously they’re just completely mentally unwell, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a must have some sort of motivation. They still must be compelled by something other than just insanity or mental illness. Because these women started off as relatively normal people. Like, they were born, they were little girls, and they grew up just like anybody else. Then they had their own children, and then they’re giving their children sterilisation drugs and mutilating them to become different gender. Why are they doing that? Why is it always the women? It’s never the men doing this to their children. The men are always opposed to it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I guess the idea is that there’s this idea that within the feminine nature, there isn’t just a life instinct, but there’s also a death instinct. You know, if we go back to, like, Mesopotamian mythology, the female deities, they were depicted as, like, fire goddesses that not just gave life, but also death. And Mother Nature kind of had this kind of, it’s a life giving quality, but also a destructive quality. It takes the trash out. And the gene pool has become so perverted by modernity, there’s so many mutant freaks out there, that there’s probably this kind of death instinct within the feminine that is engaging in this kind of arc of self destruction, cleaning out all of the defective bloodlines. And so that’s kind of, I guess, one way of explaining why we’re seeing this.

 

There was this one experiment that I found out about recently, and I’m surprised I didn’t know about it sooner, where these scientists got all these rats, and they created a rat enclosure that basically provided them with all the necessities of life so that they had basically everything that they needed.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like the rodent utopia experiment. Is that what you’re referring to?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, And then over time the rodents start developing all these mental illnesses, and they become homosexual, they become depressed, and then a whole series of killer rodents rise up and just murder all the other ones. And that’s kind of, I think maybe what’s happening in modernity, that modernity is too good, that nature couldn’t do its thing of basically selecting out all the bad blood.

 

And so we’ve had so much dysgenic breeding, and all the bad blood has been kept alive by modern science and egalitarian social mores, that now the death instinct, that’s what all this, you know, feminism and gay rights and this kind of scorn, pathological femininity, what all of these forces are like, Kamala Harris is an example of this. She’s like a mixed race woman in her sixties with no children. So she’s obviously got this kind of mutant defect.

 

And then, you know, she’s, like, now going to be the poster woman of basically Leftism in the presidential run. And she has this kind of sassy girl, boss energy. But she’s a complete idiot.

 

You know, that is the that is the kind of, as I said, the kind of trash taking itself out where there’s so much defective blood out there that it has this internal drive, maybe programmed into it by Mother Nature to just destroy itself because it’s not supposed to exist.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, interestingly, I remember that rodent utopia experiment, well. I think it was mice in some of the experiments, rather than rats. And because they had unlimited food, the rodents that started out in the experiment, that just ate a lot. They had a lot of children. These were kind of like the baby boomer generation. They got really fat, lots of kids.

 

And as their kids grew up, though, the kids resented their parents. And the rats, the main rats, the first ones, the ones beginning in the experiment, the ones that got fat, they were out during the day, but their children would actually stay in the enclosures that they had for them all day and would only come out at night. And they were very anti-social, very lethargic. And they started to turn gay. They started turning gay and weird and really violent as well. And they eventually just all killed each other. That’s how the experiment ended every time.

 

And the determination or the conclusion for the experiment, they did it multiple times to see if they got the same result, and they did. The conclusion was, without natural selection and the struggle for daily bread, a species can’t survive. It just destroys itself.

 

[1:03:39]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

And you can see that maybe that’s the White race. We created a civilisation that was too good for our own good. So then one idea developed, which was eugenics and National Socialism and building an entire society around struggle. And artificially taking over the natural selective process in order to simulate nature in order to keep the blood healthy.

 

And then another idea arose, which is quadrupling down upon egalitarianism, which is this Leftist idea. And obviously, the Leftist idea won because of how World War Two went. And what is that idea? Well, that idea is kind of like a dark eugenics. It ultimately will produce the same outcome, because by inviting in all of these foreign races and proliferating all of these degenerate ideologies, ultimately what they are doing is they’re creating a selection event. They’re creating conditions under which the majority of the White race now won’t survive.

 

So now it’s like, what elements of the White race can survive this crisis that we’ve (((self))) constructed? It’s only going to be those that are able to basically adapt to it. Which means how are you able to create bloodlines that are going to survive institutionalised, psycho-cultural memetic mass suicide?

 

And so those of us that can adapt will be the only White people left and then the blood will be re-purified and we’ll then go on to create probably another civilisation and probably it will be too good and maybe the same process will happen again. Maybe that’s just how nature works.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, hopefully we can break the cycle and achieve something greater in one of our civilisational, … God, how would you describe it? Periods?

 

But it’s all very interesting. And exploring human psychology is something that you can do for a long time. You can really go down a rabbit hole with it.

 

But I think unfortunately, people seem to be more bad than they are good, which is why they’re more easily led by their bad instincts, and which is why violence, terror, fear usually produce the best results in governing them. I think people are capable of being better, but I think we have taken the easy route which is appealing to people’s lower instincts, because that’s going to result in faster success and faster profits.

 

And the problem with this is we’re breeding a dumber race! We’re dumbing people down, we’re making people worse than they need to be in order to profit from them and in order to make them easier to control. And that’s the trajectory that we’re on a civilisational level. And there’s only one place that goes, and it’s not to some sort of higher culture or greater civilisational achievement or even greater technology. I even think we’re starting to see technology plateau, reach the limits. Like you get a new phone these days and it’s basically the same phone from six years ago, just maybe with a slightly better battery. But that’s because it’s just new and it hasn’t been used yet. It’s like technology is kind of almost capped now. Where technology is seeming to develop is with AI, but where that’s going to go is anyone’s guess.

 

But I think society is going in the opposite trajectory, compared with where it should be going. And what we believe is essentially antithetical to the current system because we believe in higher breeding, we believe in actually having children who are genetically better than us, smarter than us, stronger than us, and that would send society in the opposite direction. I suppose in order to implement a culture that was beneficial to what we understand to be humanity, we would have to stop appealing to people’s lower instincts. For the time being to actually get power. I think we still need to appeal to the lower instincts of people because that’s the only way to actually get people’s attention and to get people to trust and have faith in you, as the Churches understand better than anyone.

 

But I think long term we would have to gradually try to stop doing that. There would have to be a long multi-generational project where we actually would have to ban certain advertisers and expressions of certain political persuasions that were appealing to the lower instincts of people because the results of that we can see for ourselves.

 

I don’t know if you guys have noticed this, but when you go out in public these days, people have really bad spatial awareness now. I mean, 20 years ago, 25 years ago, people would be able to feel when you were close to them.

 

And I’ve said this a few times on stream because it’s really significant. It’s a significant change that I’ve noticed in people now where there’s so little consideration for what’s going on around them or for people walking in their path, people being close to them.

 

Especially true with Zoomers. You know, Zoomers have got their good qualities. But when I’m in the gym, man, I’m surrounded by these broccoli haired fucking kids that are standing, like right next to me. Like, right fucking! Their shoulders are almost touching mine. And I’m a guy that’s got a pretty intense aura, I think, like, you can feel when I’m there. I’m not a small person, not physically nor spiritually. Right? But they just don’t seem to pick up on my energy. They don’t seem to understand that them standing that close to me, working out right near me like that is fucking annoying, man! Like, it’s not just annoying, it’s just inappropriate and weird as well.

 

But I think there’s some sort of damage that’s being done. The intuitive senses of the Zoomers, probably as a result of early exposure to too great a technology. I spoke about this with you last time we talked as well. I think one of the benefits of being born in my generation is we became very adaptable. We had to be adaptable because we saw technology change very quickly. We experienced literally landline phones on the wall. That’s all we had.

 

And then the first mobile phones were coming in when I was like ten or eleven, but we didn’t get them yet because they were too expensive. And then by the time we were like 14, we had Nokias or something. Then the Internet gets introduced and we’re all on, like, file sharing programs like Kazar and Limewire, which aren’t around anymore. Then we get the first ever social media. Like, with there’s probably stuff that predated MySpace, but then there was MySpace, and everyone moved over to Facebook when I was about 18. And then suddenly there was iPhones and smartphone technology.

 

And basically we had to leave behind old stuff in the old ways, and we had to adapt to the new very quickly. This technology was introduced and developed, evolved very quickly, and so we had to develop very quickly along with it. But we were used to sort of a different range of experiences.

 

Like, I grew up in a sort of a pre-technological era, you might argue, where I was riding bikes and skating with the kids on the street, and we didn’t have phones, we didn’t have Internet. The only people I knew at that time in my life when I was a kid were the people in my immediate community, right? And I wasn’t connected with the rest of the world. I didn’t understand what was going on in the world, and I didn’t really need to or want to. And that feels like you remember times like that with nostalgia because it feels like a simpler time.

 

Probably because you weren’t so connected and plugged into everything everyone else was doing all the time, and you weren’t so worried about the online presentation that you were making and staying relevant and all that sort of stuff. Like everything that people are worried about now. People probably have access to too much information now, which is why on the back of the iPhones, there’s a picture of an Apple with a bite taken out of it, right? Like the forbidden fruit of knowledge. Maybe there’s a bit of a conspiracy around that. I don’t know if I believe it, but it’s interesting.

 

But the point is the Zoomers, they just had smartphones and iPads when they were like five years old. They didn’t understand any sort of life before that where there was any delayed dopamine response, where they actually had to wait for something to come out or they had to wait for something to load, or they had to put some sort of time in to achieve something. They became accustomed to instant gratification, instant reward, everything loading instantly, everything being right before them right away, getting what they want right away. Their parents all got divorced, too.

 

[1:11:44]

 

So what happens? The dad’s trying to win the affections of the child, as is the mother. They’re competing against each other, and they’re just buying the kid everything. The kid gets whatever they want from their dad, whatever they want from their mom, more than they could possibly ever want. And as a result, it contributes to that down regulation of the dopamine response.

 

And I think Zoomers are fucking cooked! I think they’re too cooked to have the intuitive sense to understand that they’re standing too close to you. There’s something that’s happened to them that’s shrunk down their auras. It’s like they’re small spiritually. Their presence is small, contained in some weird way. And it could, I think, have something to do with the introduction or them being introduced to technology too early in life. That was giving them too fast response of dopamine, as I just explained.

 

But, yeah, there’s an interesting difference in the generations, and I think it’s influenced largely by how technology is developed.

 

But am still glad, as I said, that I grew up in the time I grew up in, because I got to experience what life was like before all this shit existed. And I still remember it fondly. Like, I would prefer. I would still prefer to live in a world where there was no Internet, straight up. Everything would just be much smaller and simpler. Everyone’s world would be much smaller and simpler. Everyone would be more immediately community focused and less tied in with international nonsense that didn’t actually mean anything to them in any meaningful way, in any significant way, and is what I’m trying to say. So I think everything changed with the Internet.

 

Someone asked recently, they’re like:

 

“What do you think caused all the political extremism and all the turmoil across the world and shit?”

 

I said to them:

 

“I think there was always radicals and extremism and turmoil, but I think everyone just being able to see it and everyone being able to contribute to it, even in some small way, with an opinion, and everyone thinking their opinion fucking means something. It doesn’t.”

 

If you’re watching this, your opinion means fuck! All my opinion means fuck all. No one’s that important. No one’s that special. Everyone thinks they are. And that’s one of the ways they manipulate you, actually.

 

But, yeah, I’m just kind of rambling at this point. [chuckling] But the fundamental purpose, or the reason I was bringing this point up is I’m frustrated by the lack of consideration and energy observance or energy awareness of the average person out there. And I’ve, as I’ve probably just demonstrated, I’ve thought to some length about what’s causing people to be this way. And I do think it comes down to people just being cooked on a level of their meaning. Their dopamine response rate is just completely fucking fried out from too much instant gratification through technologies.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

[1:14:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I would say that I’m thankful that the Internet exists because the people in my immediate vicinity would have been really boring. And through the Internet, I’ve been able to have a far more interesting social experience because you can put out a unique signal and then basically transmit it across the entire world and then draw people in from a much larger pool to find people who vibe with you. So I’m actually, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You could have just made pamphlets.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know. I’m a little bit of like an international citizen, I guess. I like being a participant in the entire world rather than just the kind of what’s [chuckling] happening in Australia, which could be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sort of like the people who are at home here, there and everywhere. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, international, Anglo. That’s the thing we have a global empire. I have an imperial mindset. I don’t have a narrow Australian parochialism. The Anglo Saxon is a global ethnic group. I like being plugged into all of our affairs around the world.

 

And actually, Australia always, like, has been part of an empire and will necessarily need to be. We were talking about this before, like, if we had a situation in which the United States lost the war with China and Australia became basically subsumed under Chinese influence, obviously the current situation, we’re being replaced, but maybe it could be reversed. Maybe if Whites could get back control of the West, it could be reversed. But if we basically disconnected from the West because the imperial power projection of North America and Europe is basically kicked out of our region, then it’s over for White Australia. Like, now we’re basically stuck in a Chinese run region. And I just don’t think we would have the capacity to defend White Australia under those conditions without any assistance.

 

And that was basically what Australian foreign policy has been built around from the very beginning. That’s why we fought for the British Empire. That’s why we basically signed up to the American led international order as soon as the British Empire collapsed. Because our founders understood this Australia was an outpost of the White race or the British race on the other side of the planet.

 

So to me Australian politics is inextricable from the global situation of the European race. And so also, I think the same is true for culture. So, yeah, I don’t, therefore, I don’t have a super narrow minded parochialism.

 

I mean, there is a certain amount of childhood nostalgia that I guess you can tap into that has a certain value. But and, yes the Internet kind of makes everything bad, worse, obviously. Like, you wouldn’t probably have transgenderism if it wasn’t for the Internet on, like, a mass scale. Like, it accelerates everything, but it also can accelerate things in our direction as well. Like, we wouldn’t be able to grow our movement if the Internet didn’t exist. Like, we have no capacity to build our own television networks and national newspapers and things like that.

 

We never would have been able to compete with the jewish media or the establishment without the Internet. And you could say the Internet is also controlled, and so we can’t really compete on a level playing field. But at least we have a fighting chance on the Internet, where we had absolutely no chance under the previous paradigm, which is why from the 1960s to the development of the Internet, we were just basically constantly taking L’s. And only since the Internet became ubiquitous has there been a little bit of a counter revolution, has there been a little bit of a punchback from the Right. And the far-Right has kind of reconstituted itself and managed to get our talking points and our ideology out there again.

 

So I think the Internet makes everything bad, worse, but it also makes a lot of good things now possible that previously wouldn’t have been possible.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there’s pros and cons. I just still think, well, look, people are much. People are actually easier to control before the Internet launched for special interest groups with influence and power and the wealth necessary to maintain that power.

 

What I mean is, they could have everyone in the West thinking the same thing, just with a few TV channels, because no one had alternative news sources. Like, everyone just watched the same channels, and so everyone thought the same thing. Problem now, especially with the youth, is they don’t watch TV. The youth are on social media applications, but also trolling the Internet and finding information from, how should I say, unfiltered sources.

 

And as a result, people have kind of split up. Like, remember how everyone used to like the same songs, basically, like, everyone had, … And I’m talking about normal people, so don’t personalise this. But normal people, you would only hear new songs on the radio, and there was a few genres, and everyone had a favourite band or genre that was probably something from the radio, because that’s the only place where people got music from.

 

Now, the different genres of music and styles of music and artists there’s thousands of them! And everyone likes weird stuff now that I’ve never even heard of and that’s because I think the Internet obviously has made this possible.

 

But I think the thing that I deal with on a daily basis, especially with younger people, is I see how social media and the Internet has negatively affected real life social interactions. Have you been through, like, a drive through lately, like, for KFC or something? You’ll say:

 

“Hey, I’ll get a large Zinger Stacker Burger meal with water for the drink, please.”

 

And then the response will be:

 

“Okay, what size was that?”

 

And I’ll say:

 

“Large.”

 

And they say:

 

“Okay, and what drink would you like?”

 

And I’m thinking, I already said all this, but they didn’t listen. They were only able to listen to one aspect of my request at a time. “Zinger Stacker Burger” was all they heard, even though I said everything that I wanted. And that’s a new phenomenon that never used to happen 20, 25 years ago. And when you speak to young people, it’s like they don’t know how to use basic manners.

 

But now it just seemed like I’m ranting about young people! Like, maybe I’m getting old?

 

Joel Davis: Boomer coded rant! That’s fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Am I the boomer now?

 

Joel Davis: [words unclear] They’re fucking retards!

 

Blair Cottrell: One more thing while I’m on the train, actually, while I’m on the rant train about young people, I noticed something else I don’t like about young people.

 

But look, it’s not really something I don’t like. It’s just an objective observation. Despite some of these people actually knowing my personal history. Like, I was into street fights, and I was selling drugs, and then I went to jail. And then I was a popular political spokesperson on live TV panels and stuff. And then I got censored hard, shut down from Facebook, and three years through court for hate speech. And now here I am on this stream with Joel every week.

 

You would think they would ask me questions like they’re interested in politics, some of them. You would think they would ask me some questions, but they don’t. They just talk about themselves and their own ideas. And they just tell me how to think about certain philosophies and how smart they are. And how they came to think the way they do it. I’m just like:

 

“Huh, huh. Tell me more. And when did that happen? How long did that take? Yeah, tell me more.”

 

But inside I’m thinking:

 

“You fucking retards!”

 

You’re standing here before someone who has more life experience than average, I would say. And I used to ask people questions all the time when I was young, especially in the gym, the bigger guys and stuff. But all I did was ask questions because I wanted to learn. But I noticed young people struggle to do that. Now all they want to do is fucking talk about themselves!

 

And I suppose it ties back into that fried out dopamine response rate. They’re probably just geared towards the sort of social interaction and behaviour that’s going to give them the highest reward. And asking questions and actually listening to responses and waiting while they listen, that kind of thing. Like, that’s not really going to give you as much as a reward, like, chemical reward response in the brain as talking about yourself is. And I suppose that’s why they do so much talking about themselves, maybe.

 

But like I said, am I the am I the old one now? Am I just saying:

 

“Oh, back in my day!”

 

I mean, I’m only 35 this year. I’m not that old. But I suppose that’s approaching middle age, or maybe it is middle age. It’s definitely middle aged for me. I won’t be living past 70, not with the choices I’ve made. God won’t allow it. So I’m probably about halfway through my life.

 

Don’t take offence if you’re a young person. I still appreciate that. Fire a young spirit. I’ve said this. You don’t lose your youthful vigor. You say vig-or, don’t you, Joel? Not vi-gor. You say vig-or?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t lose your vigorousness. I mean, problem with getting older is, you see people lose their passion. They become burned out. They just get tired and lazy. And they get, I suppose, more susceptible to that harm reduction that we spoke about earlier. They’re worried about losing the little things they have, and they think that’s wisdom and growing up, but it’s not really. It’s just cowardice and laziness!

 

And what I love about the youth is they’re willing to take risks still. They still have that energy, that bravery, as Joel put it earlier, which in a lot of people can die out as they get older. As they get older, their bravery can die. And I’ve taken certain steps to make sure that my youthful boldness doesn’t die out as I age. I think it’s important to do that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I agree with that. But should we get to talk about any other stories?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. We had a really big week. I missed the stream most of it. I got the end of it last week, but it was a huge news week last week.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So this is another Noticer article:

 

“Young nationalists marched through Vienna demanding mass deportations with banner reading, ‘The Kids Want Re-migration’.”

 

This is Martin Selner’s boys over in Austria, the Identitarians, they were chanting:

 

“Fortress Europe! Re-migration! Close the borders!”

 

And they look pretty good. They look healthy young people. They look normal and yeah, I saw some videos of it going around. I feel like the Austrians really set a good standard for activism, and they’re very influential in Austrian politics. Austrian politics is a lot more Right-wing. The attitudes of the people are a lot more anti-immigration, on average, than most of the European countries and here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did Austria, …

 

Joel Davis: Something to, like, admire or look up to this is what’s possible. Nationalist movement can develop and grow. And Martin Selner has been around for over a decade. A lot of work has gone into refining and building their street movement over there, but it seems like it’s going strong.

 

Blair Cottrell: So did Austria ever experience communism on a government level?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. But they were pretty close to it, I suppose.

 

[1:26:38]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yes, they were right on the border. I think part of what has made Austria resilient is Austria never joined NATO. They kind of stayed neutral between the two sides in the Cold War somewhat. And Austria, of course, they still have the kind of anti-Nazi programming, but they didn’t get completely reprogrammed to the extent that the Germans did. And Austrians are basically Germans. They speak German, they’re part of the Germanosphere. So it’s maybe an example of where the Germans would be if they had a little bit less of the de-Nazification. And Austria used to be part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Obviously, Hungary fell to communism, but Hungary is very Right-wing, and obviously, and they’re very resistant to immigration, and so is the Czech Republic in that area. That central European area is quite resilient against mass migration and quite nationalistic.

 

So, yeah, they’re definitely case studies worth looking at. How come they’re resistant? You could say partly it’s because of the Cold War conditions. And so on, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, hey, we’re talking about. Sorry, I just asked a stupid question. We’re talking about Austria, not Hungary. For some reason I had Hungary in my head. That’s why I asked if they experienced communism. Did the Hungarian people experience communism?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s what I was thinking. Sorry, I got Austria and Hungary confused there for some reason. Sorry about that, guys.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, no, it’s just good to see the Austrians making progress. I think the Freedom Party of Austria, which is the largest Right-wing party in Austria, I think they’ve decided to include remigration policies in their official platform. And they they’re getting over a quarter of the vote, I think, in a lot of polls. And in the recent European elections, they did very well. So Austrian politics is one of the more white pilling of the European countries.

 

So I think that’s a bit of a good news story. It shows that there’s examples of countries where everything., … They’ve still got all the same problems, of course, that we have in other Western countries, but they just seem to have more of a resilient opposition movement.

 

And so there’s a model to look to in some of these European countries to emulate. In Australia, I think we should be studying some of these central European countries in particular, trying to copy some of the things that they’ve done, not necessarily copy and paste, because it’s different conditions, different culture, obviously, in Australia. I think in Australia, we have to be a little bit more edgy, a little bit more bombastic, a little bit more, because Australia, that’s the Australian personality. We’re very like, no bullshit, get to the point! And we kind of have a little bit of that, like, convict energy in our. In our collective psyche. So you kind of need to have a little bit that outlaw element, a little bit of that abrasive bogan quality, but intermixed with a no bullshit attitude.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s what made me popular. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yes, of course. So I think a lot of other countries will look at us and say:

 

“Oh, the Aussies go a little bit too far!”

 

But I think that you have to in the Australian environment. I think in our culture, if you try to copy and paste too much from these other countries, I think you would end up coming across, like nerds, to a large portion of the Australian population.

 

And the problem that we have in Australia isn’t even, like, winning the argument. A lot of Australians are quite willing to hear our arguments, but it’s about making them give a fuck! A lot of us, we have a very apolitical society. Like, if you look at the opinion polls on Australian attitudes towards immigration, we actually have far more anti-immigration attitudes in our population than any other country in the Anglo-sphere and most countries in Europe.

 

But we have some of the worst Right-wing politics of any Western country because of how apolitical everyone is if you ask them:

 

“Oh, yeah, there’s too many immigrants!”

 

But then they just completely checked out of politics.

 

So we have to find a way to make people find politics interesting and get engaged in politics. And so then we have to kind of attune ourselves to the nuances of the Australian psyche. I think it’s a different problem for a lot of other countries. I talk about this before. Like, in America, it’s a very political society. So their problem isn’t that people don’t care about politics in America, but their problem is that people get sucked into the wrong kind of politics.

 

So it’s a completely different issue in America than in Australia. And I don’t know too much about Austrian culture, but anyway, it’s just good to see White power, global White power. So we support all nationalists everywhere doing anything, and have a lot of respect for the Austrians, that’s for sure.

 

Blair Cottrell: That remigration, mass deportation slogans seems to be becoming popular. It’s like amongst the general working class. I mean, there’s not a lot of disagreement, from what I can tell, with that particular message. I mean, people don’t want Africans living here. They don’t want free entry from India.

 

I mean, there’s 1.6 billion people in India! And we don’t want all those people coming here to Australia. Like, every working class Australian would agree with that. Most Indiana residents would agree with that, too in Australia, I think! [chuckling] Like, even I’ve seen some posts from Indian people saying:

 

“We’ve got to stop bringing in all these Indians!”

 

And they themselves are Indian!

 

But, yeah, like I said, the remigration thing, the mass deportation slogan, it’s generating some support from the working class, even here in Australia, from what you describe as an apolitical society. Very atheistic, too, if you’re watching this and you’re not from Australia. Australians aren’t very big on religion or politics, so it’s really hard to get through to them with anything.

 

As Joel suggested, the best way to penetrate their ignorance is just through being like them, being one of them and having that robust, vigorous patriotism and just kind of calling it as it is, pushing things to the point of being abrasive, taking some damage in the process from the institutions and the repercussions that come from these institutions.

 

They respect all of that, they liked seeing someone stand up. They love an underdog Australians! They love seeing someone who doesn’t have power. Yeah. Who doesn’t have wealth, stand up and win or make something of himself, or at least just create controversy to the extent where the system, the government, the police are pulling their hair out. The Australian working class loves seeing that! So I think that’s worth knowing.

 

[1:33:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, one of the only countries in the world that would lionise a figure like Ned Kelly as a national hero with, you know, Ned Kelly was, for those who don’t know, just basically a gangster of the people, basically. [chuckling] That’s what he was!

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a bank robber. He was treated unfairly by the authorities and he ended up becoming a bank robber, I think. But, yeah, it was basically just a renegade bank robber. But he had his own principles and he felt like, as an Irishman, …

 

Joel Davis: No only robbed banks, he’d also burned the mortgage records of everyone in the town, so everyone loved him. And then he’d shout a night out on the piss. When the police showed up the people:

 

“Oh, we didn’t see him!”

 

Because he just burned, … They weren’t going to cooperate with the authorities. This guy just basically forgave their mortgage and shouted them on the beers. [chuckling] so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Bit of an Australian Robin Hood, in a way, Ned Kelly, up against the rich, representing the little guy. And he had sympathies for the little guy, but he was an Irishman and as the story goes, he was experiencing some serious oppression from the Victoria police, which was largely British or English. And they had a bit of a, how should I say, racist sentiment towards the Irish settlers, you know. So there’s always been racism in Australia, even between Europeans.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know if that would be racism. That’s more just kind of ethnic conflict. But, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, that was the greatest racism we really expressed or experienced for thousands of years was just against others who were still kind of like cousins to us, but they were still different enough to be weird, you know what I mean? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: We fought the Muslims. We kicked the Muslims out. A lot of our people, the Brits and the Irish, went down to Spain to help the Reconquista and kick all the Moors out of Spain and fought in the Crusades, and we kicked the Muslims out of the Balkans. And they got as far as almost, basically, almost all the way to Austria at one point. So no, race war has kind of been almost a perennial reality in European history. I mean, yes, as we kind of protected it from it more in Britain and Ireland than almost anywhere else, because it’s one of the absolute most secure zones for the White race, historically speaking.

 

But, yeah, of course, it’s a different kettle of fish in Australia. We get here and we’ve got abos and Chinese are coming over to the gold fields and there’s a different paradigm, similar to what the Americans experienced in North America, where they’re fighting the Mexicans and the Native Americans, and then you got black slaves to deal with and so on.

 

And so we kind of threw ourselves into a bit of a racial meat grinder. But, no, I hear what you’re saying. Like, in those days, the Irish and the English and their mutual rivalry kind of was what was the kind of dominant issue in Australia, because Aboriginals, we had obviously, a massive power advantage over them.

 

And one of the key precipitating, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They were never seen as a legitimate, like, organised threat, the Aboriginals, because they weren’t.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. One of the precipitating factors of White nationalism developing in Australia was the Chinese coming over, not the Aboriginals. The Chinese coming over. Then a bunch of English, Irish and Scotsmen realised:

 

“You know what? Yeah, we’ve got our little disputes with one another, but we’re all White men and we’ve got to get these chinks out!”

 

And so an amount of White unity formed around a mutual threat, which is obviously how these things often go.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, as I was saying earlier, we had a big news week last time you and Tom covered a lot of that stuff, and I chimed in on the end. I’m pretty ready to wrap this show up and have an early one this week if you’re keen. You got a Superchat?

 

Joel Davis: Okay. This wasn’t a Superchat, but I saw someone mention in the Odysee chat. “Mass Deportation Party, MDP”. I like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, maybe. Maybe?

 

[1:38:01]

 

Joel Davis: I like that’s cool! I like that. I like it. That’s all! I got a couple Entropy Superchats. One is from Borderland Rising. He said:

 

“Blair clicking his fingers when talking about Zoomers was fucking hilarious! Good show, lads. Keep it up.”

 

Thank you. And Ravenkeeper said:

 

“Greetings from the United States. Thanks to you, Blair and Tom, for all your great work! Have either of you been to the United States? If so, where? And what were your impressions?”

 

Blair, you never left the country, have you?

 

Oh, might be frozen. I don’t know if, … Blair’s frozen. Okay, I guess I’ll just answer this Superchat, then. Put ones in the chat if you can still hear me. Okay. Blair just dropped off.

 

I have been to the United States quite a few times. I’ve been to New York and just the tri-state area, I’ve been to Florida. I’ve been to Texas briefly, California briefly, and Hawaii. And my impressions of America are, I love the food. The portion sizes are massive! How good is the food? And so on. Yes. Like, particularly Texas had some really good steaks. I do like, whenever you get to the kind of White suburban areas in America where you get away from the major cities, and you get out into the White flight, it’s beautiful. And the people are really wholesome. There’s a big difference between Americans and Australians. Americans are super friendly, they’re super enthusiastic, and they’re quite warm. And I definitely appreciate that about them. So do like that aspect about Americans and America.

 

But, yeah, one thing I didn’t like about America was when I was in Manhattan in New York. I really do not like Manhattan at all! The buildings, there’s so many of them. They’re so tall and imposing. You feel like you’re in this kind of concrete cauldron, and there’s just so much, such a negative vibe. The whole place stinks of weed. There’s, kind of freakish looking people everywhere. There’s a lot of blacks, you know, particularly in a lot of public service jobs and so on. Like, public sector jobs and service jobs. And that’s a really kind of jarring experience. And there’s a lot of jews.

 

And so the whole energy of the place. The women are exceptionally slutty and the yeah, the whole energy of the place. Everyone’s very rude. Everyone’s very obnoxious. People are very inconsiderate. It’s not a good environment, I think when you squash so many people into one area, particularly with a whole lot of jews and non-Whites, it produces a very negative attitude. And homeless people produces a very kind of negative general attitude because you basically can’t give a fuck about all the people around you because you just can’t operate in society effectively being considerate to others because it’s such a dog-eat-dog environment. Such a obnoxious environment.

 

So you have to become obnoxious yourself in order to survive in that environment. And so, yeah, the place just has this very dark, unspirited energy. I really hated it. So that’s New York. America isn’t like that in general.

 

As I said, there’s other parts of America I went to. White picket fence, White flight suburbia, where everyone’s gorgeous! So it really depends where you go. But I think Americans are both the best and the worst of the White race in many respects.

 

But, Blair, you’ve never been to the US, have you? Never been overseas.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be surprised if they let me in, because I’ve got, even though it’s a long time ago, it’s still a criminal record, which is pretty serious. And that, coupled with my politics, I think if I went there for a brief holiday, I could argue my rights to entry, but they could always, just on the whim of some border security bureaucrat, they could say:

 

“No, mate.”

 

And I kind of respect that about America, the fact they have, you know, strong principles against, or attitudes against criminals entering their country. But it’d be easy for me to get into a Commonwealth country, probably because I’m a Commonwealth citizen obviously.

 

But, yeah, never been to America. Never really had a strong desire to go. I’m not a travel around the world and see sights kind of person. I’m just happy at home usually. But if I had the opportunity, I wouldn’t waste it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I definitely am keen to go back to America. Hopefully I can get back in. And they let me back in. My girlfriend’s American, so that gives me a reason. I’ve got a lot of friends to go there as well. I want to go to America, and then when I get there, I’m going to get an AR 15 and I’m going to film myself shooting it into the air while throwing a Roman. And just enjoy my [words unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: I was worried. I was worried what you’re about to say. I’m like, what the are you going to say? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to enjoy my First and Second Amendment rights, my ancient Anglo Saxon rights that still exist, at least somewhere.

 

Blair Cottrell: Somewhere I would actually like to go is like, to the Nordic countries. Like, just because I like the cold, and I want to see the mountains and the forests like, where would be a good place to go for that? Like Germany, Finland. Germany is not necessarily Nordic, but, you know what I mean, you’ve been to Sweden, we’ve spoken about Sweden before, but also Japan. Like, I wouldn’t mind seeing the mountains.

 

Joel Davis: Denmark as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Denmark, right? Yeah.

 

[1:43:56]

 

Joel Davis: I thought Copenhagen was actually quite a nice city. The physiognomies, as well, were very familiar. I was like, I guess because that’s where the Anglos came from. Right? Denmark.

 

But, yeah, I was very surprised. I was like, the people kind of look Australian to me in a certain way in Denmark, but that was, that was a very pleasant place. I thought it was quite funny because the people are very kind of reserved and friendly, as most Scandinavians are.

 

But then when I went out drinking in Copenhagen of an evening, everyone gets fucking hammered! Like, it’s crazy! Like, [chuckling] they go hard. The inner Viking spirit comes out. I was like:

 

“There’s no Viking spirit here. Everyone is so sweet and pleasant. You know, where’s the Viking?”

 

And then you go out and then it gets to 11, 12 o’clock at night and you see the Viking come out. Everyone’s just absolutely sloshed! And there’s people keeled over, vomiting everywhere and passed out on trains.

 

And I thought that was kind of funny and endearing, actually. Yeah, but Scandinavian countries, very eugenic, a lot of good looking people, and they are very friendly and sweet. But I did find the Swedes, I like Swedes, but I did find the Swedes to be, they’re friendly, like, they’re very nice, but I don’t know, I find it hard to, like, connect with a lot of them because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it because they don’t understand sarcasm?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they don’t have, they don’t really banter like we do.

 

Whereas, like, when I was in England and Ireland, oh, I didn’t go to Ireland, but when I met Irish people in Europe or when I was in Britain or Scotland and I met people, you know, it was I had instant rapport, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, because that’s where we come from. That’s, like, genetic, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. And I felt like in, even though the people look like us in Scandinavia, they don’t have that aspect to their personality. Like, they’re very, you know, straight down the line, and I just found that a little bit I’m not gonna say uncomfortable. I wasn’t uncomfortable, but it’s just a little bit harder to connect with people when they don’t have that quality that we have. They’re almost, like, too nice. I don’t know how else to say it’s not a bad thing! You could say they’re more pure, maybe in a certain sense. It’s a noble thing. But you know, as an Anglo, I kind of like hearing, …

 

Blair Cottrell: People like, just, … There’s something about being an Australian where unless you’re actually hitting your friends with some hard truths and being a little bit abrasive with them, they don’t really trust you. If you’re too nice in Australia, it’s suspicious. You got to be a little bit harsh down here to be trusted and understood. Maybe it’s the criminal element in our stock. I don’t know what that is exactly, but it definitely comes from England, [chuckling] because the English are much the same.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but, I mean, like I said, I do like them as a people. Going there was a good experience because it made me care more, not that I didn’t care before, but made me care more about a little bit of insight. Care more about their politics and their people and so on, and keep an eye on I got to meet some activists when I was there in the Nordic Resistance Movement. They were very good people.

 

And, no, I’m grateful for that experience. I definitely kind of see, you know, after the Anglo-sphere the Nordic countries and the Germans and like, the Dutch and so on, I see them as they’re the most closest to us racially and culturally. And so I have a very big soft spot for all those countries and those people groups.

 

But, yeah, in terms of, there’s nothing really beats Australians to hang out with, because when you’re an Australian, that’s just who your people are. But so Australia itself, it’s a beautiful place, but it can be a little bit boring. But I just kind of I just wish there was Australians everywhere. Like, if there was an Australian pub in any foreign city, like, kind of like how there’s an Irish pub everywhere, which is, I guess, kind of close, but if there was an Australian pub in any of these, I’d be going straight there. And I really appreciate, when I got back after going to Europe for a year and I came back to Australia, I didn’t realise how much I appreciated Australian banter and friendship [chuckling] until I came back, because, yeah, no one really kind of gets me, like, Aussies.

 

So I think traveling only makes you appreciate home more in a lot of ways.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve heard from a lot of my friends that you find Aussies when you’re overseas too. I think I’ve mentioned this before, like, even though you’re in England or somewhere in Europe, you can easily kind of hone in on your own accent. Like, you tend to find other Australian tourists really easily.

 

But I’ve got to go eat dinner soon. So did you want to go through the Superchats? Are you keen to fire off on that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s a few others here. Let’s have a look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I might just leave you to do them, man, because I’m super hungry and I’ve I’ve been pretty active, …

 

Joel Davis: Only a couple left because we read out a few other ones. It says here, I think this is from Cozy Clips:

 

“In 2010, a White liberal woman and Malcolm X scholar went to Haiti on a humanitarian work. She was raped and afterwards wrote an article blaming the White Patriarchy for it. No saving these women!”

 

Yeah, I remember reading that. And, yeah, obviously that’s a lost case. You know, it’s the point where like, a White Leftist, like, are they even White anymore? They’re basically they’ve become spiritual traitors and they’re so defective that they might as well not even consider them White, particularly someone that far gone.

 

Same reason why I wouldn’t consider a race mixer of White, or there’s really much point even being too concerned with homosexuals. I think either that are White because it’s like that’s just like a line of death. Like, there’s not perpetuation of the Aryan blood through that person. So they might as well be, like, black or brown as far as I’m concerned. Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Any thoughts on abortion being a eugenic necessary evil? Do we want the type of women who would even consider killing their babies to reproduce?”

 

If there’s an argument, do you want to answer that? Blair or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I have a certain sympathy for people who, as you described earlier, homosexuals and in this case, women who are geared towards aborting their babies, because I think they’re a lot of the time victims of bad influence rather than inherently bad themselves. And so it actually makes me more vengeful against hostile subversive influence, which leads members of our race to make these decisions and do these things with their lives.

 

So that’s the way I look at it. It just reinforces what I discussed earlier in the stream, the necessity to inoculate our national community against this kind of influence that leads people to do these things or to behave in this manner.

 

So we’ve got to stop being so receptive to hostile ideas and understand what’s subversive, identify it, ban it, make it illegal, and jail people who are spreading it. You know it’s got to be that way for a while. I think, to actually reverse the damage that’s being done. It’s got to be like, literally full fascist dictatorship. This is the enemy, down with them sort of thing.

 

So until that becomes legal policy in Australia, you’re still going to get women going to abortion clinics for no real reason other than they want to travel or they just don’t feel like having a baby. You’re still going to get people turning gay and turning their children transgender with sterilisation, drugs, et cetera, et cetera, until the root cause of this issue is addressed, which actually isn’t the people themselves, but the way people are being influenced. Until that’s addressed, it’s going to continue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, the argument, the woke eugenic argument is that it actually, the fault is actually in the people, that some people have a resistance to the current culture. Like, they can exist, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think, … I understand the argument. I just don’t think enough people have the resistance. People need to be protected. That’s the point.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think there’s a certain balance between these two tendencies, like a happy medium.

 

But I think the eugenics side of the argument does make, has some points in its favour. Like, for instance, women who get abortions, they are more likely to have narcissistic traits and other kind of psychological illnesses that would predispose them to being worse mothers.

 

So that you have a woman who’s, like, a total piece of shit and she kills her baby because she’s a piece of shit, it’s like, okay, like, that’s obviously an immoral thing and heinous thing, but it’s almost like, well, what are the genes that are going to be going into that baby? And what kind of nurturing environment are they going to be raised in if the baby’s kept alive? Like, is that baby just going to now be some defective? Like, if we keep that baby alive, are they going to be raised properly? Are they going to have good genes? Are they going to end up becoming a good functional member of the race? I mean, that’s an open question.

 

So I think the eugenicists have, like, points in their favour, but then at the same time. Yeah. I don’t think you can just allow these ideas to run rampant in your society. You know, some people, just because people are conformists, it doesn’t mean that that’s bad. Like, in a society, a lot of people are predisposed to conformity because for most of history, society wasn’t run by our racial enemies and wasn’t run by totally insane freaks like it is now. And so under those conditions, respecting authority and just conforming to the society around you and just going along with the culture would have been mostly good because we had a mostly good and healthy culture. And so those people are kind of victims of this larger process.

 

As I said earlier, talking about democracy, a lot of people aren’t cut out for thinking about politics in a very abstract way and thinking about the collective well being of the race or the nation in a very kind of Zoomed out way. They’re kind of optimized for just they’re kind of interpersonal relationships. And so a lot of those people aren’t necessarily, like, defective. They’re just kind of victims of a lack of good leadership.

 

So this points in Blair’s favour as well. I think you have to kind of balance both of these considerations, as I said.

 

But I think that’s basically it for the Superchats. So we’ll end the stream there. I hope you guys enjoyed the show this weekend. We’ll be back next week as always. And yeah, thanks, everyone who sent Superchats. Appreciate you supporting the show, and we’ll catch you all next week.

 

And also, if you’re watching on Rumble, I noticed we get way more views than their subscribers. I think that’s because a lot of people haven’t made Rumble accounts. They just kind of watch the stream sj make a Rumble account! Subscribe, like the streams! It helps boost them in the algorithm.

 

And then you can also leave comments. Yeah, just make a Rumble account.

 

And anyway, I also want to say, actually, as well, clip the show, post it on Twitter and post it on TikTok. I got to keep saying it because I want to keep reinforcing it. You got a spare bit of time, you’ve got a Twitter account, or you can make a TikTok account, make some choice clips of the show where you think there’s a couple minutes where one of us was cooking on something and it was a good clip and go spread it around. That’s how the show, one of the main ways we get new viewers to the show or the show grows, our influence grows.

 

So it’s kind of up to you, the audience, to help extend the influence of the show. There isn’t really much else like this in Australia. What we do, offering the perspective that we offer, that gets any, at least nothing that really gets much views or gets much attention. So help spread the show. We’re under so much censorship, we’ve been banned off YouTube. Now between Blair and I’ve got three YouTube channels banned. You know, obviously, Blair and Tom are banned from Twitter. Yeah, we’re fighting an uphill battle. We kind of can’t think about going on something like Facebook or Instagram. We just instantly get wiped out. I know Blair and Tom got wiped out from Facebook back in the day when that was still more of a relevant platform.

 

So the way in which we can get around censorship is by having a group effort to push our clips and push our influence around the censors. They can’t ban everyone. They can ban the key central nodes in the system, but they can’t ban all of you guys. So some of you get banned, but they can’t ban everyone at once.

 

So that’s a key strategic adaptation we have to make to make sure that our propaganda keeps spreading and promulgating online despite the censorship. So help out, participate, be an active node that advances.

 

And also, when you see other people do this, give them a, like, give them a retweet. Like I’ve been showing this guy, he made a Twitter account recently, it’s quite good, called the White Australia Policy. Go follow the White Australia Policy on Twitter. Great Twitter account. He clips the show and there’s a few other guys that clip the show.

 

And if you clip the show, like, send it to me if you want, like. And I can spread it around a little bit. Don’t just put a clip up. You got a Twitter account with 50 followers or something, and you put a clip up and it gets almost no views. You know, you got to post it in the replies, post it in the replies of my tweets, post it in the replies of other, you know, anti-immigration accounts or Australian nationalist accounts on Twitter, or even in the replies of our political enemies if it’s making some counterpoint to what they’re saying. Yeah, just get it out there!

 

[1:58:20]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/30/2024 = 53)

Seppl88
5 hours ago
Altruism for racial outsiders is contributing to our demise. Race should be above all. You guys are on the right page.
0 likes

Seppl88
5 hours ago
Women in general lack an understanding of social realities and are prone to WOKEness. Giving women education past high school is detrimental to our race.
0 likes

MiamiBadGuy
15 hours ago
Trump is not “inevitable.”
0 likes

theunbeholden
21 hours ago
What organisation is Blair behind? I remember some group being mentioned before but I can’t remember it right now.
0 likes

masklophobix
1 day ago
God is beautiful so in their rebellion against God they must destroy anything that is beautiful, including themselves. Atheism has destroyed us.
1 like

blobgnarley
1 day ago
Joel looks like the Anglo bin Laden with that beard
1 like

Sceptaginoth
1 day ago
Theres no such thing as an aura you hippy
1 like

Sceptaginoth
1 day ago
channel the sol brah
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
2 days ago
I like the asocial tendencies of Swedes.
0 likes

Irishman2023
2 days ago
I think you have hit the nail on the head with the spatial awareness thing. Also with the dumbing down of society. Subscribed! Good work guys.
0 likes

FreedomFighter8888888888
2 days ago
Hertchfield in Berlin, a jew is the father of transgenderism, Elon is saying he wants to destroy the woke mind virus, wokeism is jewish. He needs to destroy the leftist jews who killed his son.
1 like

› Show 1 reply
Vicki88888888
2 days ago
Rumble is using BS algorithms to censor certain words like the N word. Arabs and N have F all respect especially towards WHITE WOMEN.
-1 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
Joel is getting more than 10k views
on Rumble. That means he is getting watched by more Aussies than the Olympic in fucking Paris.
0 likes

Sinagoglies
3 days ago
It was religious war between the British JudeoMasonic govt and Catholic Ireland. England genocided almost half of Ireland – forced starvation exporting food sources etc calling it a potato famine. The Eureka Stockade was quite international but dominated by the Irish and the leader was Peter Lalor – an Irish Catholic. Some even called it an Irish rebellion. I know Joel has tried to claim it as purely Anglo recently. Britain a Masonic Protestant wealth cult built to support the “jews spreading liberalism, faggotry and heathenry. You guys are looking more like anti Western civilisation Marxists quoting all these skanky modernists that J$ws promote! Joel even recently backed Jew Karl Marx’s justification of stealing land from Catholic Mexico. Hatred of mankind and self worship of race is a Jewish trait. Hitler did not hate mankind. Japan and Palestine were with the AXIS. You’re all pretty sloppy with historical facts – making it up as you go along. TWO FACED NAPOLEON EMANCIPATED THE JEWS! https://rumble.com/v58df44-when-will-enough-be-enough.html Jews love pagans! https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/barbarians Some Eureka historians have suggested that as well as most of the miners inside the stockade, in the area where the defensive position was established, the miners were overwhelmingly Irish. Even the password used at the Eureka Stockade – Vinegar Hill – was the scene of an 1804 Irish convict uprising in New South Wales.[6] http://www.eurekapedia.org/Ireland https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/castle-hill-rebellion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Eureka_Stockade_defenders A Great Mini Series on Australian convict history including the ship journey based on historical facts. It is very hard to find but I found one site that sold the DVD. Against The Wind TV series 1978 – Irish Rebellion (Vinegar Hill) Australia 1804 – Philip Cunningham’s pledge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-c90s1IlDw
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
3 days ago
Irish Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne, Daniel Mannix was anti conscription (as were most Catholics as opposed to Protestants) waking up Aussies as he knew WW1 was a trade war / banker war. “During October 1916, he exploded onto the political stage in Australia, when prime minister William M Hughes tried to introduce conscription by a national plebiscite. Mannix opposed compulsory military service. “I hope and believe that the peace can be secured without conscription in Australia. For conscription is a hateful thing, and almost certain to bring evil in its train,” he said.” “England was the “greatest hypocrite in the world,” he charged. “Ireland has the same grievance against England which the American revolutionaries had, only ten times greater,” he told his summer school audience. “England was your enemy, is your enemy and shall be your enemy for all time.” https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/specialreports/archbishop-daniel-j-mannix-cork-born-cleric-drew-attention-to-irish-situation-943244.html Archbishop Mannix – a tribal icon, controversial prelate? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTt5sYxBbBw There was a Catholic movement in Australia which infiltrated the unions controlled by Communists in the 40’s and 50’s B.A. Santamaria and The Movement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMceNPNZLZk
0 likes

Sinagoglies
3 days ago
Adolf Hitler’s Christian Germany: The Twelve Year Christendom https://www.bitchute.com/video/17SjPY3Z5RDo The history of the yellow star Although this public branding of the Jews is associated with Hitler’s Germany, it predated the Holocaust by centuries. In Europe, it first appeared in 1215, when the Fourth Congress of the Lateran introduced an easily distinguishable dress code for all Jews and Muslims. This took the form of a special head covering, such as a pointy hat, or a garb in the form of pieces of fabric attached to clothes. The aim was to force Jews to convert to Christianity, and the dress law persisted in some places until the eighteenth century. Only the age of the Enlightenment and the spread of liberalism led to the fall of the medieval ghettos, and the Jews to receive equality. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/covid-yellow-star-and-history-of-jewish-persecution/13539606 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_VII#Reinstitution_of_Jewish_Ghetto Reinstitution of Jewish Ghetto[edit] Under Napoleonic rule, the Jewish Roman Ghetto had been abolished and Jews were free to live and move where they would. Following the restoration of Papal rule, Pius VII re-instituted the confinement of Jews to the Ghetto, having the doors closed at nighttime.[14] Pius VII issued an encyclical “Diu satis” in order to advocate a return to the values of the Gospel and universalized the feast of Our Lady of Sorrows for 15 September. He condemned Freemasonry and the movement of the Carbonari in the encyclical Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo in 1821. Pius VII asserted that Freemasons must be excommunicated and it linked them with the Carbonari, an anti-clerical revolutionary group in Italy. All members of the Carbonari were also excommunicated. Pius VII was multilingual and had the ability to speak Italian, French, English and Latin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cum_nimis_absurdum
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
Transcript of the video is here: [Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/26/joel-davis-when-will-enough-be-enough-jul-25-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: – The Australian woman gang-raped by five Africans in Paris. – Criticize the lack of response from bystanders in the kebab shop. – Discuss the dangers of naive travel and the “wanderlust” mentality. – Blame boomer parents for encouraging unrealistic travel expectations. – They discuss Elon Musk’s revelation about his son becoming transgender. – They criticize the role of Musk’s ex-wife in the situation. – Express skepticism about transgenderism and its origins. – They discuss Elon Musk’s pro-Israel stance and its implications. – Genetic mutations and their potential link to leftist beliefs. – The importance of choosing a mentally healthy partner for reproduction. – Young nationalists marching in Vienna, Austria. – They compare political climates in different European countries. – The conversation shifts to Australian politics and culture. – The challenges of engaging Australians in politics. – Share their experiences and impressions of traveling to the United States. – The differences between various parts of America. – Their experiences in Scandinavian countries. – Cultural differences between Australians and Scandinavians. – Express appreciation for Australian culture and banter. – The concept of abortion as a potential eugenic tool. – Debate the balance between genetic predisposition and environmental influence. – The need to protect people from harmful cultural influences. – The challenges of conformity in society. – The importance of good leadership in shaping societal values. – Encourage viewers to engage with and share their content. – The challenges of censorship on various platforms. – Strategies for spreading their message despite censorship. ….
0 likes

Delete
GhostDogMan
Supporter
3 days ago
Good Show. Thank you for highlighting the BS of 5 wretched Subsaharans defiling a lively Aussie Lass. Enraging! If this was a Palestinian vs. Israel attack, Israel would have deported or obliterated 50 Africans for revenge. We need to stop their Supremacy
0 likes

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
You are a racially aware. So are they. Why would they assist an Australian woman? To be honest I am surprised that someone took a swing at the black. On revenge? Yes. But only when one cannot be caught. Hence the Italian saying “revenge is a meal best served cold”. Always be careful when taking revenge, take it, but be very careful.
1 like

BradC1988
3 days ago
If there were no niggys running loose in Paris, that Aussie woman would never have been raped. We need mass deportations now!
1 like

ihatebolshevikscum
3 days ago
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡀⢐⡂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣤⣤⣴⣶⣾⣿⣟⣭⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣛⠲⣤⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠷⢋⣉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣅⠛⣿⣿⣷⣦⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⣭⣤⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣜⡛⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⡴⢶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⢙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣠⢶⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢋⣡⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠷⣆⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣏⠠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⢉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡷⠌⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠌⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠺⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⣃⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠶⣌⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⡿⠿⡿⠿⣿⣿⣿⡆⢸⣿⣿⡿⣛⣉⣉⣙⣿⣟⣛⣻⣿⣿⣿⡆⣽⣯⣥⣴⣶⣶⣾⣝⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣦⣽⣧⣬⣭⣬⣾⣿⠏⠉⠉⠛⠛⠻⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⡜⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡋⠑⢦⣍⣋⣙⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⢶⣿⣿⣿⠟⣩⡿⠛⠉⠉⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⢳⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⣿⣮⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣽⣿⣿⣷⡌⢿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣠⣶⡿⠗⠺⣿⡏⢾⣿⣿⠃⣼⡏⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣷⣬⣝⡛⠛⠿⠿⠿⠛⣛⣛⣭⣴⠎⣿⣿⡿⠁⠀⣰⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣿⣿⣷⣶⣤⣼⣷⢸⣿⠃⢸⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠹⣦⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣥⣾⡿⠋⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠘⣿⡀⢸⡿⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⠋⣠⡶⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠉⠉⢛⡟⠋⠀⠀⣠⡞⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⣾⣷⣤⣤⣶⣿⣿⠇⣸⠏⠀⠀⠙⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⢠⣶⣿⣿⣿⠋⠀⣀⣴⡾⠿⣿⣄⠙⣻⢿⣿⠀⡀ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣿⡋⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢠⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣦⣬⡀⢻⣶⣾⣄⣏ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣿⣧⠀⢻⣿⣿⠟⣩⣿⣿⣿⡇⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠛⠛⠛⠉⠻⠿⣿⣧⣤⣄⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠇⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⢠⣿⣿⡯⣏ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠛⠋⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣤⣴⣿⣿⣶⣤⣴⣿⣿⠟⣡⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⠀⣸⣿⣿⣷⣄⣿⣿⡿⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⣿⣿⣿⡿⣯ ⠀⠙⣟⣅⠘⣿⡛⠻⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⢿⣿⡿⠀⢀ ⣴⣿⣿⣿⣧⠙⢿⣦⣄⡙⠻⠿⣆⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠉⣉⣉⣉⣁⣀⣀⠐⣾⣶⣶⣿⡄⠀⠀ ⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⡧⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⡀⢸⣿⡟⠛⣟⠻⣿⣛⠻⢟⠻⠿⢟⣛⡟⢉⣉⣉⢱⣲⡯⣴⣶⡟⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⣄ ⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⠇⣿⣿⣿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣧⢠⡇⣿⡔⣿⣗⣿⣿⢶⣿⣿⡷⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⢸⣿⠇⠟⣛⣅⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠆⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣟⣫⡄⠨⣥⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢨⡇⣹⡁⣛⡏⠻⠛⠛⣿⣛⠃⢛⣻⣏⣨⣭⣥⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠈⣷⣌⠻⣿⡏⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠛⣫⣤⣶⣦⡀⠉⠉⠉⢛⣿⣿⠚⣇⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢿⣿⡿⢺⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⠇⢛⣩⣡⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢋⣤⣤⣄⡈⢻⣷⣌⠃⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⢰⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⢹⣾⣧⣌⣛⣘⣛⣃⣘⣛⣃⣘⣛⣫⣬⣭⣥⣴⣶⣿⣟⣵⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠟⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣧⡘⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠘⠛⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
1 like

› Show 1 reply
kalamazoogroyper
3 days ago
Really great ep boys – love the discussion around the psychology driving political thought and loyalty – also as an Aussie with an American wife I like hearing Joels take on the States and Americans
1 like

Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
I like the street reporter vibe…
1 like

jamerry1982
4 days ago
Wandering,alone,at 3am,in a foreign country where dozens of similar incidents have occurred in the recent past,but,hey,that’s racist and racism’s much worse than a bunch of dudes raping a lone woman,this is beyond a fucking joke that the liberal media will suppress these stories because,y’know,diversity an that yeah,fucks sake.
2 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
The natural order is hierarchical. Not egalitarian. “Equality” doesn’t exist in nature. http://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/art/20-ways-the-lord-of-the-rings-is-both-christian-and-catholic.html The Men Who Caused the French Revolution 1789 http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/03.htm In the previous chapter evidence was given to prove how a small group of foreign money-lenders, operating through their English agents, remained anonymous while they secured control of that nation’s economy for the modest sum of £1,250,000. Evidence will now be produced to identify some of these International Jewish money-lenders and prove they, or their successors, plotted and planned, and helped finance, the Great French Revolution of 1789, exactly the same way as they had plotted and planned and financed the English Revolution of 1640-1649. In succeeding chapters evidence will be produced to prove that the descendants of these same International Jewish Financiers have been The Secret Power behind every war and revolution from 1789 onwards. Cont… French Revolution = emancipation of J$ws giving equal status to Catholics – a disaster for Europe and the world! https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ajs-review/article/abs/french-revolution-and-the-jews-assessing-the-cultural-impact/6393D65C0AC8AFDE2320075927B15955 The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints. Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement. Cont…
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I] This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom. The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France. https://fitzinfo.net/2014/02/26/alex-jones-freemasonry-and-the-cult-of-constitution/
0 likes

Joshua1000
4 days ago
W stream
0 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Jews were banned from England in 1290 and not allowed back until Oliver Cromwell lifted the ban in 1656. The Rothschild British Empire: Roman Catholic Guy Fawkes The Start Of The Warnings! Father Of Anonymous! How did England deal with a corrupt puritan government/parliament? http://politicalvelcraft.org/anonymous/ ISLAM AND JudeoMasonic PROTESTANT COLLABORATIONS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam Judaizers: https://slife.org/protestantism-and-islam/ Why The Crusades Were Awesome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aFkoX6g1fE http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Islam_and_Protestantism HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Following the Turkish conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmet II and the unification of the Middle Eastunder Selim I, Suleiman the Magnificent, the son of Selim, managed to expand Ottoman rule to Balkans. The Habsburg Empire thus entered into direct conflict with the Ottomans. At the same time the Protestant Reformation was taking place in numerous areas of northern and central Europe, in harsh opposition to Papal authority and the Holy Roman Empire led by Emperor Charles V. This situation led the Protestants to consider various forms of cooperation and rapprochement (religious, commercial, military) with the Muslim world, in opposition to their common Habsburg enemy. EARLY RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION (15TH–17TH CENTURIES) During the development of the Reformation, Protestantism and Islam were considered closer to each other than they were to Catholicism: “Islam was seen as closer to Protestantism in banning images from places of worship, in not treating marriage as a sacrament and in rejecting monastic orders”.[1] Relief statues in the Cathedral of Saint Martin, Utrecht, attacked in Reformation iconoclasm in the 16th century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Revolt#/media/File:UtrechtIconoclasm.jpg
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Anglo-Turkish piracy Main article: Anglo-Turkish piracy After peace was made with Catholic Spain in 1604, English pirates nevertheless continued to raid Christian shipping in the Mediterranean, this time under the protection of the Muslim rulers of the Barbary States, and often converting to Islam in the process, in what has been described as Anglo-Turkish piracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turco-Calvinism ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam “As part of a propaganda campaign including prints, pamphlets and much else, many Geuzen medals were created as badges of affiliation, using a wide range of symbolism, including that associated with the Ottoman Empire. William I of Orange sought Ottoman assistance against the Spanish king Philip II.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geuzen ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam “From 1608, Samuel Pallache served as an intermediary to discuss an alliance between Morocco and the Low Countries. In 1613, the Moroccan Ambassador Al-Hajari discussed in La Hague with the Dutch Prince Maurice of Orange the possibility of an alliance between the Dutch Republic, the Ottoman Empire, Morocco and the Moriscos, against the common enemy Spain.[40] His book mentions the discussion for a combined offensive on Spain,[41] as well as the religious reasons for the good relations between Islam and Protestantism at the time: Their teachers [Luther and Calvin] warned them [Protestants] against the Pope and the worshippers of Idols; they also told them not to hate the Muslims because they are the sword of God in the world against the idol-worshippers. That is why they side with the Muslims. — Al-Hajari, The Book of the Protector of Religion against the Unbeliever” During the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), the Dutch would strengthen contacts with the Moriscos against Spain.[43] In the 17th century Protestant communities again asked for Ottoman help against the Habsburg Catholics.
0 likes

ProvingNihil
4 days ago
The only thing good about having the internet as kid nowadays, it’s a easier way to extra money, and build internet friendship’s that could turn into real life friendship’s. I do miss going outside riding my bike around town, not caring about a single thing. Being an adult is tough, but there’s absolutely nothing I can do about it. Also what happened with that Australian woman is utterly disgusting, it pisses me off that no one stepped in to help her. That shouldn’t have happened, it’s a real shame that European countries are being graped by these colored scumbags, hell look at their country for example it’s usually a cesspool.
0 likes

ADC789
4 days ago
You think you know Peak Feminism, check this one out. I have a client in her late 40s never married had IVF kid and she has put the kid on heavy antibiotics to kill down his microbiome so his shit doesn’t smell like mens shit is meant to. This boy is going to go through puberty soon, what chance is he?
-1 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
IVF is extremely evil.
1 like

ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Blairs dropping those big fact BOMBS! 100% agree with you man, I was born in 1990. I remember the day’s as child going outside being a kid, where internet didn’t take over my life, and where it wasn’t a concern. These kid’s nowadays have no idea how bad they have it, man what a great conversation to bring up Blair.
6 likes

MelancholyMonkey
4 days ago
Great stream, as usual. You guys never disappoint. Warm greetings from America!
3 likes

Lueger
4 days ago
1:26:30 Austria, like Germany, was occupied by the bolshevik and Anglo-American agents of international jewry after WWII, but was able to get the occupants to leave in 1955 by pledging never to unify with Germany (irrespective of the democratic will of the population), to be neutral, and to limit their military to only self-defense forces.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
3 days ago
“When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable buildups, as fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of antifascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them.” (Communist Party Directive, 1943) Austria defending against Commies/Liberals/globalists/Demoncrazy in 1934 𝐃𝐢𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥ä𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip9iLTjogB8
0 likes

Metalhead86
4 days ago
problem with a lot of women is they bought into this naive notion that they shouldn’t be racist and ignore their instincts, just buying into the bullshit. African rape monkeys and towel head dune coons are out in the streets at 3:00 a.m. in every major city.
10 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
You’d think all those Astronauts & Engineers, Doctors and Scientists would be home in bed at 3am, having a big day at work in the morning and all…
4 likes

Lueger
4 days ago
52:45 HJ ransacked the Institut fuer Sexualwissenschaft (Magnus Hirschfeld) and burned the library in front of the library of the University of Berlin (now the Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin) along with other jew-communist degenerate “literature.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld Apparently Hirschfeld was a sodomite himself.
5 likes

ballsagna
4 days ago
I was in France in 2012 and it was gorgeous, including Paris – granted I only went to Paris for 2 days and a night (mostly stayed with friends in Lyon / Nice / St Tropez).. & steered clear of all nonwhites. I wouldn’t go back now. My son has been intrigued by Italy since age 2 after seeing a mural at a local restaurant. I always wanted to take him there but after seeing the recent Africanization… I’m wary. These scum are stealing our history and our civilization.
14 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Carnierge
Supporter
3 days ago
The Italian police are more hardcore in dealing with the problem than other continental European nations. But you could still come across the wrong deranged Ugandan at the wrong time and have a very bad day. Overall Italy is still better than France in this regard, for now.
2 likes

vigilantejustice23
4 days ago
I think most women who go along with the tranny stuff for their kids are engaged in pathological altruism. Fathers are more likely to give their kids tough love and tell them something they don’t want to (but need to) hear. Fathers promote discipline. Mothers can be so empathetic that they end up enabling bad behavior (some even are manipulated by their own children.) of course this empathy is necessary for children, but it can be twisted for nefarious purposes. For example – these mothers are told that if they don’t let their kids “transition” they will fall into a deep depression and commit suicide, and it’ll be all their fault. Many of these kids are already engaging in self-harm like cutting, so their mothers are desperate for any fast solution. It’s a very evil way of corrupting a healthy maternal instinct. Most men oppose the tranny stuff not only because they aren’t as easily manipulated, but also because they’re put off by the lack of masculinity/faggotry. Women are generally less contemptuous of weak/feminine men in a SOCIAL context than men are (i.e. they certainly don’t want to sleep with weak men, but they also don’t want to beat them up) Anyway, the point is that I don’t think it’s a mothers “death instinct” generally motivating this stuff – there’s no logical reason to believe white mothers would evolve to develop a “death instinct” although the point made about the biological trash taking itself out is definitely interesting
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Public perception of single motherhood has been manipulated to go from shameful to preferrable, slut shaming & fat shaming will get you fired or even wind up in court while race mixing is promoted. And you just nailed all the reasons it is so – to get White Men out of the home.
0 likes

Nickdorshimer
4 days ago
fire
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago

0 likes

AvidFan
4 days ago
“Davis” is English. “Davies” is Welsh.
3 likes

katana17
4 days ago
Last week’s show. [Joel Davis – Trump Inevitable, Blair Censored, Paedo Freaks Destroyed – Jul 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/20/joel-davis-trump-inevitable-blair-censored-paedo-freaks-destroyed-jul-19-2024-transcript/
1 like

Delete
BillCarney
4 days ago
Thanks.
2 likes

BREPERR
4 days ago
Never underestimate the govts ability to mind control populations. Women are mentally warped and so are leftist men. That’s what’s driving them agaisnt maternal instinct. Look at birth control and how it makes women go towards more effeminate men who have lower testosterone, and when they get off the pill they are no longer attracted to their bf
15 likes

BREPERR
4 days ago
Please add link or screenshot of Australian official organization warning athletes to not wear national colors in Europe so we can share across social media
9 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
theunbeholden
21 hours ago
Also check out Gtvflyers.
0 likes

 

 

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Judge Napolitano: Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Monday, May 6, 2024. Scott Ritter joins us now. Scott, it’s a pleasure. Thank you for joining us. I want to talk about a variety of topics. The suppression of free speech in the United States, the coming invasion of Rafa, the compulsive fear of criticizm of Benjamin Netanyahu, and the latest in Ukraine.

 

And I’ll start there. Do you think President Putin is running out of patience, or will he continue his methodical war of attrition, no matter what Emmanuel Macron says, no matter what David Cameron threatens, no matter what Tony Blinken promises?

 

Scott Ritter: I think we need to understand one fundamental truth here, that this conflict is seen by Russia as an existential conflict. That there is no tie, there is no defeat. There is only victory. And they have put together a plan to achieve that victory. And they’re on the cusp of that happening right now. As we speak the Ukrainian army is disintegrating at the front. This is sending waves of panic through NATO, etcetera.

 

And this is why you see Emmanuel Macron talking about the need to send French troops if the Ukrainian line collapses. Well, it’s collapsing right now! David Cameron making similar statements.

 

Russia has a plan. They have mobilized the troops. They have trained the troops. They have the military, conventional military to achieve this objective. As I was told by a general earlier this year, major changes on the map in May and probably game over by the end of the summer. And that’s the trajectory there on.

 

The problem is you have the West saying insane things such as if the Ukrainian line collapses, NATO troops will intervene. This is why Vladimir Putin now has ordered the Southern Military District. [chuckling] People, please just open your eyes and your ears and listen to what I’m saying!:

 

“The Southern Military District to carry out training for the employment of tactical nuclear weapons.”

 

This doesn’t mean that they’re going to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. They’re not. They’re going to blow the hell out of NATO forces in Romania, Poland, Germany, France, Italy. It’s nuclear war! If this is what you want, west, you’re going to get it! Putin doesn’t bluff! This ain’t a game! This isn’t joke. This is life and death for Russia! They’ve made that clear from the very beginning.

 

And so now we have a situation where NATO tried to cause bluff. The United States poured hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weaponry and money and such into the Ukrainian military. Russia had a plan. They ground it out.

 

All this nonsense you hear in the West:

 

“Russia is suffering 1,000 dead!”

 

The number of Russian losses right now on the battlefield are the lowest they’ve been since the war started. That’s how unbalanced this is right now. Russia is dominating the front line! They are devastating Ukrainians. It was 800 Ukrainian dead a week ago. It was 1,000 earlier. It’s up to 1500 dead. They’re just being slaughtered! They’re being annihilated and there’s nothing to replace them.

 

[04:02]

 

So they are literally collapsing. NATO is in a panic. Macron’s talking about sending troops. Poland’s talking about sending troops. And Russia’s saying:

 

“I don’t know how many times we have to tell you if NATO troops show up on Ukrainian soil, we’re going to nuke you! We’re going to nuke you! Okay? We’re going to take you out. Not your troops in Ukraine. We’re going to nuke the decision making centers!”

 

Russia isn’t bluffing. I hope the people watching right now are getting cold sweats right now because the world’s over at this point, ladies and gentlemen. Okay, it’s over. It’s game, set, match. It’s done! Whatever plans you had for the summer, they’re canceled. Whatever Christmas plans you had, forget about it.!

 

So get scared. Start calling people and saying:

 

“What the hell are you doing, Tony Blinken! Biden. Get on the phone to Macron and tell him to shut up and sit down!”

 

The same thing with the Poles, because this is it. Russia is getting ready to exercise the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the Southern Military District. Okay? That means that if NATO troops are deployed, because the Ukrainian army is collapsing as we speak and Macron has said:

 

“It’s his red line. And if they collapse, I have no choice, he says, but to send French troops in.”

 

Well, the Russians will kill them, but then they’re going to nuke France. So there we are. This is about as serious as it gets.

 

And yet we are sleepwalking. We are sound asleep! Nobody in America cares. Nobody!

 

Judge Napolitano: Do they understand what you’ve said? But they choose to ignore it for political reasons? When I say they, I mean the West, the West wing, the White House, the American State department.

 

Scott Ritter: No, no, no! Because they’re not suicidal. I’ve seen them scared before. I’ve seen them early on when Putin said:

 

“Hey, I just want to let you know, from the start, this is our thing. We’re doing it. And if you put NATO boots on the ground, we nuke you!”

 

And at the start, everybody:

 

“Oh, you can’t say! That you can’t talk about nuclear weapons.”

 

And they were scared. And then they said:

 

“Well, we don’t see any evidence of this, and we think he’s bluffing.”

 

And then when he reminded them, again:

 

“You guys come in there, we nuke you!”

 

He’s bluffing. He’s bluffing right now. They think he’s bluffing.

 

Judge Napolitano: Let me ask some technical questions. If Ukraine is foolish enough to send an F35 equipped with a nuclear weapon into the sky and it is shot down, does that engage the nuclear aspect of it?

 

[06:35]

 

Scott Ritter: If Ukraine possesses a nuclear weapon that engages the nuclear aspect of it. The moment Russia finds out Ukraine has received a nuclear weapon, Russia will react accordingly. Ukraine cannot have nuclear weapons.

 

Now, here’s an interesting thing. Russia has put the West on notice that they will treat the F16s as nuclear weapons carriers.

 

Judge Napolitano: All right.

 

So that’s the point of my question. If they truly are nuclear weapons carriers and Russia uses a low yield nuclear weapon to take it down, does that set off the nuclear paraphernalia, for lack of a better word, in the atmosphere?

 

Scott Ritter: First of all, Russia’s not using nuclear weapon to take it down. Russia’s going to drop a nuclear weapon on Romanian bases, Polish bases, German bases, and then they’re going to go ahead and take out decision making centers. So they’ll engage Europe without 50 nuclear weapons. Then the question is, what is the United States going to do? Commit suicide? Because that. That’s just low yield. That’s low level stuff Russia is using. All their big stuff still sit there on full alert. On full alert!

 

So the moment the United States goes to alert, sends signals out to the subs, the Russians will say:

 

“Okay, screw it. Goodbye, [word unclear] with you. You’re all dead! Everybody dies! We go to heaven as martyrs because we didn’t start this. We warned you, do not use F16s!”

 

Those of 16s come from nations that are part of the NATO nuclear sharing program. And because they are part of the nuclear weapons sharing program, we have to assume that they still retain that role when they enter Ukraine. And the West is going:

 

“But no, no, no!”

 

Russia doesn’t care.

 

Judge Napolitano: Does Ukraine have American F16s as we speak?

 

Scott Ritter: They are training on, not American F16s, on, I mean, American made F16, but they’re training on F16s provided by NATO countries as we speak. These weapons have not arrived in Ukraine yet, but they’re expected to do so sometime this summer.

 

So this is why Russia’s trying to give us all the heads up possible. They’ll treat it as a nuclear weapons carrier. If NATO troops land, get involved, they’re going to Russia’s ready to go to nuclear war. This is not a game for Russia. This is literal existential survival! People should listen to Vladimir Putin tomorrow he’s being inaugurated.

 

One of the biggest events in modern geopolitical history, in the West, again, is ignoring it. Listen to his speech. It’s going to be very deliberate. His words are going to be carefully chosen.

 

Judge Napolitano: If President Macron sends a few thousand troops to Ukraine, French, regular French troops, not the Foreign Legion, does Putin attack Paris?

 

[09:31]

 

Scott Ritter: Well, no. What will happen is that Putin will kill all the French troops, and then he’ll probably strike the French logistics centers in Romania.

 

Now, at that point in time, France has said that, I mean, the stupidity of the French is unmeasurable. You have a French general who says:

 

“But we have 200 nuclear weapons. Russia would never bomb our troops in Romania!”

 

Well, that’s my worst French accent in the world.

 

But the point is, [chuckling] it doesn’t matter, man. Russia’s got thousands of them. And they will take you off the map! And that’s what France needs to understand, that you will be taken off the map! You will no longer exist! Whether you have 200 nukes or not. The French need to start shutting up! And this is where America’s got to be a leader. And call Macron and say:

 

“Just shut up! I don’t want to hear another word out of you!”

 

Judge Napolitano: So, so does Bill Burns, the head of the CIA, understand what you just said?

 

Scott Ritter: 100%! He knows they’re not bluffing! He is right now screaming to the White House:

 

“This isn’t a joke! This is red alert kind of stuff!”

 

But here’s the problem. Blinken and Sullivan said:

 

“Well, we can’t back down, because then that the Russians will think that they’ve achieved some sort of nuclear deterrent supremacy over us. We have to stand tall. If we back down, then the NATO nuclear sharing program is no longer viable. We can’t back down. This is about pride. This is about America standing tall!”

 

And they’ll say this nonsense, and Biden will sit there with his senility and go:

 

“Oh, yes, we must do this!”

 

And next thing you know, we’re going to be standing tall. The French are going to go:

 

“Well, America’s standing tall. Hell, let’s do this.”

 

And boom, we’re all dead! We need leadership right now, and we don’t have it.

 

Judge Napolitano: How many troops do we have on the ground in Ukraine, out of uniform or in?

 

Scott Ritter: Not that many? I mean, I’ve heard other people talk about some ridiculous numbers, to be honest.

 

Let me just say that one number I heard was 15,000. That’s a division. That’s 750 tons of sustainment a day. I don’t know if anybody knows how many trucks loads that is. That’s a footprint that is detectable and interdicted. I think that we’re, we’re dealing with hundreds at the most. Maybe 100, 150. That’s it!

 

We don’t have that many on the ground. We can’t afford to have that many on the ground because it’s a huge risk. They are detectable and they’ll be killed.

 

Now there’s some talk about if we send in these Patriots because Ukraine doesn’t have the crews for them anymore. Remember, when you destroy a Patriot battery, you kill the crew. I’m sorry, guys, [chuckling] I don’t mean to smile about this, but how stupid can people get? Isn’t.

 

Judge Napolitano: Isn’t. The crew of the Patriot battery consists of Americans.

 

[12:08]

 

Scott Ritter: They used to consist of Ukrainians that were trained. They’re all dead!

 

So now when we come in, we’re going to see American contractors, not necessarily serving soldiers, but when we start turning over this equipment, it’ll be used to protect the airfields where the F16s are coming in, which will be maintained by American contractors.

 

And so you’re going to have a lot of Americans on the ground in a airfield and the Russians are just going to kill them all.

 

Judge Napolitano: Is it true that President Macron sent 1500 French Foreign Legion, not regular French soldiers? French Foreign legion, which as I understand it, correct me if I’m wrong, Scott consists of many foreigners, not just French people, but the Command and Control is French, sent this is a group to Ukraine. Is that true?

 

Scott Ritter: I don’t believe. So because that’s. We need to be careful. The French Foreign Legion is still the French army. The men that are in there are French soldiers. They wear the French flag. They follow the orders of French. They’re not independent actors. They are a force that is used overseas a lot. You know, they used them in Africa extensively, but they’re still part of the French army.

 

And as such, if they deploy to Ukraine they will be French army. They’ll be treated by the Russians as French army. And they’ll be killed.

 

Judge Napolitano: Ray McGovern reports that seven of them were killed in the past weekend. Do you have any ability to confirm or alter that?

 

Scott Ritter: I’ve heard that seven Frenchmen were killed. Um, you know, there may be an arrangement where foreigners in the French Foreign Legion can leave the French Foreign Legion and join the International Legion in Ukraine to make a direct transfer. The French might have come up with an arrangement like that, but that still has the soldiers on the ground wearing a Ukrainian flag, not a French flag. But, yeah, no, I heard that the seven of them got killed. I heard that there’s a number of them that are out there, a couple hundred that are on the front lines plugging this is Macron’s interim measure.

 

So basically, he went to the French Foreign Legion and said:

 

“If you are foreigners and you’re under French contract, we are willing to., …”

 

And I don’t know the total deal, but I would imagine that you get sheep dipped, you go over, you fight for the Ukrainians, but the clock still ticking for your French pension.

 

And then when that’s done, if you live, you come back, they reconvert you get credit for your time served and your contracts maintained intact. Because otherwise, if I were a French Foreign Legionnaire, I wouldn’t do it. You know, be like:

 

“Wait a minute, I got a good deal here in France. I’m not going there without protection!”

 

[14:49]

 

It’s the same thing when in Vietnam, back in the old Laos days, when they used to take air force officers and have them go off and fly, you know, forward air controlling for the CIA in Laos, they sheep dipped them. They weren’t air force officers anymore. They were CIA officers.

 

But as soon as that tour ended, they went back to the air force and the air force went:

 

“Hey, you’re back. You get credit for your time served, your promotion didn’t get cucked up. Good fitness report, and your career is made!”

 

I’ve known a number of Ravens, they called them that had that happen to them, because they wouldn’t have signed up for the CIA and throw away an air force career.

 

So the deal had to be made. I’m sure the French did that to send these guys in, but these aren’t French Foreign Legionnaires.

 

Judge Napolitano: This scenario that you’ve described, whereby Putin might use nuclear weapons, is this understood by General Brown, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of staff, and by Secretary Austin, the Secretary of Defense?

 

Scott Ritter: Yes.

 

But the question now is, in the Defense Intelligence Agency, are they saying that:

 

“Is Putin’s bluffing?”

 

This is the key question of intent. This is where the failure of the United States to engage with the Russians. There was a time when we met with the Russian defense attache. We met with the assistant defense attaches both in Moscow, here in the United States. We had conversations. And this is the purpose of the defense attache to call up his counterpart and say:

 

“Guys, this ain’t a bluff. Okay? I know you got your politics, but this isn’t a bluff. This is as serious it gets.”

 

It also allows American officers sit down and go:

 

“Hey, what’s going on? What’s your intentions? How can we nip this thing in the bud?”

 

We don’t have any of that dialogue now.

 

There’s been no connectivity between our military officers and Russian military officers. There’s absolute steel barrier there! And with that, now, when you can’t talk to the Russians, you don’t know what they’re thinking, so you start to speculate. And the longer you go, the more ridiculous your speculation gets.

 

So right now, the guys that the State Department should be turning to, the foreign area officers who are supposed to be the experts, they say:

 

“What are the Russians thinking?”

 

They go:

 

“We don’t know because we’re not allowed to talk to them. We haven’t been allowed to talk to them for over two years now.”

 

So they don’t know.

 

Judge Napolitano: All right, switching gears to Israel and Gaza. Actually, to the domestic aspect of Israel and Gaza. Why is the government so forceful and enthusiastic about cracking down on the freedom of speech? What is the government afraid of?

 

[17:23]

 

Scott Ritter: Well they’re afraid of the truth and they’re afraid of, … They know for a fact that this is an issue that can rapidly spin out of control as far as the government’s concerned. It’s expanding across the campuses. There’s a chance that once the school shut down, this will jump into the streets and we’ll have a long, hot summer of, you know, anti-genocidal stuff going on. And we’re leading up to an election. And this is not the optics that the president, United States wants to see.

 

So they’re doing this.

 

And now, I mean, this is a question I have for you because I’ve been a very I’ve been strongly saying that this is a frontal assault on not just freedom of speech, but freedom of assembly. And I have people that are saying:

 

“No, no, no, they don’t have freedom of assembly. They don’t have freedom of speech rights. This isn’t a constitutional issue.”

 

I believe it is. But you’re the Constitutional expert on this. Are these students, in the faculty? Are they protected by, know, first Amendment rights here, or is the school right in cracking down? It’s a legal question, and I’m not a legal specialist.

 

Bernie Sanders: They are out there not because they are pro-Hamas. They are out there because they are outraged by what the Israeli government is now doing in Gaza. Which is bringing unbelievable harm, not just to the terrorist organization, the Hamas, but to the entire Palestinian people.

 

And that’s why these anti-war demonstrators are out there. They do not want to see a situation continue where 110,000 Palestinians out of, you know, 5% of the population have been killed or wounded. Where children now face starvation. Hundreds of thousands of children face starvation because Israel is refusing to allow humanitarian aid to get to where it has to go.

 

Demonstrations is what the right to dissent, the right to protest, that is what the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is all about! That’s what, in fact, makes you a free country! Being a free country means that somebody goes out and demonstrates you don’t have to agree with them. They have the Right! That’s the difference between autocracy and dictatorship in a free country.

 

But for anybody to suggest that we cannot be critical of the government of Israel or the government of Italy or the government of Ireland, for whatever reason, is not what democracy is about.

 

So I happen to believe not everybody agrees with me that the war policies of the Netanyahu government are a disaster! They are causing unprecedented harm. They are in violation of international law and absolutely in violation of American law, by the way.

 

But I think people who are critical. The idea that people who are critical of what Netanyahu is doing are anti-semitic, that is nonsense! And that is a very, very dangerous line to cross in terms of freedom of expression in this country.

 

I am thinking back and other people are making this reference that this may be Biden’s Vietnam.

 

[20:40]

 

Judge Napolitano: All right, so I’m having a problem with my camera, probably because I’ve been on all day, and that’s all right. You know what I look like, and everybody watching now knows what I look like. I think that was too little, too late. But he’s the only United States, Senator, the only member of the Congress that we’ve heard speaking that way.

 

Scott Ritter: Right. My only problem with what Bernie said, and I agree with everything he said, there’s, is the way he starts, these students are not pro-Hamas. Bernie, it doesn’t matter! It doesn’t matter. Okay? Free speech is free speech. You know, it just so happens that Bernie, by saying they’re not, you know, pro-Hamas, that they’re going against the policy of Netanyahu, that he morally can stand with them. But where would he be if they were saying they were pro-Hamas?

 

Judge Napolitano: Well, they have. They have the right to be!

 

Scott Ritter: That’s what I’m trying to. That’s my point is that this is a free speech issue. It’s not a free speech issue that is sugar coated by saying, and it’s a free speech, and something that I agree with that the Netanyahu government is genocidal and bad and we need to oppose them. No, Bernie, it’s a free speech issue. It’s black and white, free speech. There I agree with. But they’re being shut down because, it’s private universities, except they take federal money.

 

So, I mean, but your freedom, assembly issues, you know, this is one of those areas where the police and the powers are, I mean, I love it, … When I say I love it, I hate it when someone like Ben Sasse, former Senator from Nebraska, current president of University of Florida, is talking about:

 

“How we love free speech and freedom assembly, but we’re not going to let them practice free speech and free assembly on our university because there are rules!”

 

Judge Napolitano: Well, I mean, why are they so, why are they so afraid of free speech? Why was the crackdown so ferocious? The governor of Texas sent 100 state Texas Rangers in on horseback! The president of the University of Texas hadn’t even asked for that. The Mayor of the city of New York was up there personally. At Columbia University, there were 500 demonstrators and 1,000 police! They had a Professor, an undercover Professor was also a, works in New York City NYPD intelligence spying on the students at Emory University. Two big, huge thug, overweight, tattooed cops beat the daylights out of a female economics Professor. Why the ferocity because of speech?

 

[23:19]

 

Scott Ritter: Well, it’s not because of speech. It’s because of the message. The United States is on the cusp of losing control of the pro-Israeli narrative. You know, the pro-Israeli lobby has been very careful in how it’s approached the Israeli issues, etcetera. They’ve tried to make Israel the 51st state. I know. I went to Israel everywhere. Every time there’s a holiday, it’s an Israeli flag out of one window, an American flag out of the other:

 

“We’re like America! We’re the same as America! We are America!”

 

And that’s their thing.

 

And right now, Americans are going:

 

“That ain’t us. We’re not genocidal. We’re not doing that. We disagree with this so much!”

 

And this issue has the opportunity to transform American public opinion about Israel, which is why they have to nip this thing in the bud. This isn’t about free speech or anything. This is about ensuring that an anti-Israeli narrative doesn’t take hold in the American population in an election year where there are ramifications at the polls.

 

So all of the people that are part of the establishment that the Israeli lobby has been lobbying, you know, for so long, bought them out, paid for their elections, whatever, they’re all saying:

 

“We got to take control of this because this is our future. This is our political future. We have married into this pro-Israeli lobby and now we have to step, …”

 

Look what Congress just did. Passing, …

 

And again, I’m not a legal scholar, but I mean, a simple reading of the First Amendment:

 

“Congress should not pass any laws that infringe on the free speech and the free press.”

 

Congress just passed a law, an act that tries to tell me what anti-semitism means.

 

Judge Napolitano: Surely that’ll be invalidated by the courts, although it is repellent that Congress would do that.

 

Switching gears to our last topic, what do you think about twelve thugs who would say in writing to a prosecutor:

 

“Target Israel and we will target you. We will sanction your employees and your associates, bar you and your families from the United States. You have been warned!”

 

Scott Ritter: Now, these aren’t just thugs. These United States, Senators and every single one of them should be reprimanded. I don’t know who, because one of them is, you know, Mitch McConnell, you know, who’s retiring as the Minority Leader.

 

But, you know, this is criminal on their part. This is not what the United States should be about.

 

And frankly speaking, the President of the United States should chastise the Senate. Tell them that:

 

“You don’t get to make policy! You can’t warn anybody. You have no powers!”

 

Warn them:

 

“What are you going to do, Tom Cotton, what are you going to do Mitch McConnell, Marsha Blackburn? What are you going to do? You can do nothing! It’s the exclusive purview of the executive branch to make these decisions! Now, we will go to you for advice and consent. And where necessary, you will have to ratify decisions that the president makes.”

 

But these Senators don’t get to do this is the Mafia. This is thuggery.

 

Judge Napolitano: Wait a minute. Wait a minute, Scott. Wait a minute, Scott. The Mafia would be smart enough not to put this in writing!

 

[26:19]

 

Scott Ritter: True, true. [chuckling] But where’s Biden? That’s what gets me. Is Biden silent on this? Literally? The president needs to step up and say:

 

“Now, separations of powers, you guys are out of your box. Get back in your box. You know, you don’t get to do this!”

 

You don’t get, now there was a law that was passed that you know, that basically said that the international criminal court came after American service members, et cetera, that we would take appropriate actions. But what these guys have done is unilaterally extend the meaning of the law to say that:

 

“Israel is the same as America!”

 

Israel is not the same as America! Israel is a foreign nation. It is a totally different state, which is right now committing genocide! And we ourselves recognize that what they’re doing is wrong. So these Senators are insane! And they should be chastised, they should be reprimanded, and they should be put back in their box, because if they don’t, it’s just, again, an example of America spinning out of control because of poor leadership in the White House.

 

Judge Napolitano: Scott, I’m going to have to go because of this camera issue. We got to figure out what it is. But thank you very much for your time, my dear friend. Thank you for your analysis. Thank you for your passion. I’m off to Italy, but we’ll see you next week, my man.

 

Scott Ritter: Okay.

 

Thank you very much.

 

Judge Napolitano: Of course. Camera will be fixed. Coming up at 5:30 Eastern, Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Judge Napolitano for judging freedom.

 

[28:04]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 5/7/2024 = 1,355)

@roderickjoconnor6064
11 hours ago
Scott spot on putin is not bluffing
499

18 replies

@bullsonparade687
9 hours ago
How many times does Putin have to prove he’s never bluffing before the West takes him seriously!?
31

@jhkhan
9 hours ago
@bullsonparade687 Until the mushroom cloud (God forbid) and West deserves it (probably).
30

@flashgordon6670
9 hours ago
100,009
6

@flashgordon6670
9 hours ago
The side that uses nukes first, is the side that’s losing the conventional war.
11

@rooseveltrugless4658
8 hours ago
YES…But GOD help us.
6

@harveytadman
8 hours ago
And what does it matter who was right as your skin turns red, blisters and starts to peel off your body ?
11

@theoBaba773
7 hours ago
One day, the Russian flag will fly over LONDONetsk
6

@marklouieadame
6 hours ago
@flashgordon6670 and we know who will do it first
2

@screamingmonk
6 hours ago
I don’t think Russia uses nukes first
4

@user-lk2vh7vk3k
6 hours ago (edited)
Scott wasn’t bluffing when he went after under age girls as well. The Police caught him and now a registered offender. It’s Public info and not recommended as a baby sitter for young girls.
2

@butmunchass
6 hours ago
@theoBaba773 that’s what Stalin said then he started preparations for fleeing Moscow due to Nazis closing on him

@butmunchass
6 hours ago
@user-lk2vh7vk3k I wonder whether Putin has blackmail on Scott to have him acting like this?
2

@chriszzw30
6 hours ago
He does nothing but bluff. A true boy who cried wolf. No one is listening now, he just isn’t credible and needs to be removed.
2

@vern146
6 hours ago
@chriszzw30 feel better now ?
3

@eac26114653
5 hours ago
This is crazy. I feel bad for the French men and women troops who may get killed for no good reason. And I don’t want American men and women troops to get killed for this. And I most certainly don’t want American civilians (me) to get killed by this nuclear war stuff.
4

@Theone-bc7tr
4 hours ago
History shows the bear never bluffs
3

@Spellscape
1 hour ago
​ @flashgordon6670 like the USA when they bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
1

@raymondpomfret4214
24 minutes ago
​ @theoBaba773 londonstan, not British anymore

@johnboykin3128
10 minutes ago
Putin can’t fight in Ukraine forever in a limited capacity while NATO takes shots at Russia from the safety of the sidelines. Russian soldiers Russia Putin and FJB and his supporters

@dev5392
8 hours ago
Scott is absolutely right the US and NATO has lost the plot risking all our lives. Send the politicians to the front line
289

3 replies

@Jojohumf
5 hours ago
Please encourage others to write to their MPs or representatives.
3

@PeterLamin-pi6rv
3 hours ago
​ @Jojohumf all elected representatives should be sent to the frontline
9

@adamnoman4658
3 hours ago
@PeterLamin-pi6rv And all the unelected ones, too!
– –
7

@robertgwatts1858
11 hours ago
We need Scott, over here in Europe, to knock some sense into the EU!
482

14 replies

@marcosvidal3146
11 hours ago
The amount of the diet coke daily supply that Scott needs is impossible to get in Europe
11

@tonylinkich3464
11 hours ago
Yes
3

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
If only……
2

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
​@marcosvidal3146 eh?
3

@under-en6lo
11 hours ago
He’s busy over here right now. Really busy.
7

@aidanmacdougall9250
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal3146 Zelensky has a bigger diet of Coke!
26

@-M0LE
10 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 if you want to start a war offer Scott a coke zero
5

@flashgordon6670
9 hours ago
The EU hasn’t sent troops to Ukraine. Countries have done so independently, bc of NATO, not the EU.
4

@vern146
6 hours ago
@flashgordon6670 doesnt excuse there maddness and double standards though does it …
1

@chriszzw30
5 hours ago
Not sure he would be let in with his child sex offences
3

@user-lk2vh7vk3k
5 hours ago
@chriszzw30 True.
1

@hk3339
5 hours ago
​@flashgordon6670 EU? NATO? West is drowning in its bs… they are all the same bs in different label. Pepsi/coke.
1

@Ghandi12
4 hours ago
If you join the demonstrations it have more impact, but most people prefer watch it from the chouch. Stand up man, be a man show your guts every weekend and join the woman and man that doing the fight whit there voice every day or 9n the weekend. Fight now whit your voice, later is really to late. In Ukraine we are at point where they talk about nuclear, in the middle east they doing genocide. I really don’t understand why people are going to work but not demonstrat. It’s the future of our childeren. But he ypou believe the masters and your mesdia. Stand up man.
3

@albertschulz5575
44 minutes ago
Amen, Brother!

@johnfarley4201
11 hours ago
Putin and Lavrov mean business and straightforward to deal with.
258

1 reply

@Jojohumf
5 hours ago
I hope some of the people reading this, will email or write to their local representatives or MPs to have this war stopped.
3

@antoniovillanueva308
9 hours ago
I like it when Scott Ritter yells at me. I would rather someone yell the truth at me than to have someone politely lie to me. Ritter is a national treasure.
138

@rayal4395
10 hours ago
Judge, you are on overdrive with 9 interviews today!
I salute your dedication and hard work
236

3 replies

@elianamckee
6 hours ago
He’s unstoppable!
7

@Dot_Connectrice
2 hours ago
Agreed!
2

@suntzuhli
2 hours ago
He is paid to do this by russia
1

@Vic-bf4pf
11 hours ago
Only man with any brains can you imagine the French saying we have two hundred nuclear weapons to Russia this is more serious than Cuban missle crisis thank god Kennedy had brains to negotiate thanks Scott god bless you
306

4 replies

@genrcflyer
10 hours ago
Kennedy blinked, agreed to pull US missiles out of Turkey and Greece.
17

@kahutochishisumi9056
8 hours ago
​ @genrcflyer right
1

@heimomoilanen9654
5 hours ago
Then were sane men in the west, not sure about present ones.
3

@yarpenzirgin1826
3 hours ago
@genrcflyer Meaning he did not want to end the world???
1

@PerceivedREALITY999
11 hours ago
The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson.
303

28 replies

@svs8909
11 hours ago
HOW TRUE
17

@marcosvidal3146
11 hours ago
the apparently friendly judge banned me from his channel, that’s how much he loves dissenting voices. Food for thought.
Fortunately this is the internet, judge, so I can create another account in 2 min. First Amendment, remember?
4

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal3146 You were banned??
Why??
4

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal3146 You were banned why??
3

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal3146 You were banned why?
2

@gusa8006
11 hours ago (edited)
​​ @marcosvidal3146 You were banned?Why?
2

@marcosvidal3146
11 hours ago
@gusa8006 I gave a detailed reply to your question but… it disappeared again
1

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 YouTube keeps deleting my Comments as well
4

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 YouTube keeps deleting my Comments as Well
2

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 YouTube keeps deleting my Comments as Well
1

@gusa8006
11 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 YouTube keeps deleting my Comments
2

@gumarobertson-xk9ob
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal3146 you must have been a paid bot
7

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Looks like we could be learning another stronger message is Macron carries on acting the fool
2

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago
@gusa8006 you’re on russkie propaganda channel….
Same rules apply as in Russia…
Only convenient posts are allowed…
105% turnout and 110% election score for the sole contestant.
1

@tayclift5322
10 hours ago
​ @georgesbv1 Its always amusing when Americans talk about fixed elections in other countries
11

@PerceivedREALITY999
9 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 What do you hope to achieve with your childish comment?
4

@flashgordon6670
9 hours ago
Am I allowed to say, I hate hate speech?
1

@user-xt8ty6hr3p
7 hours ago
Russian folk wisdom. If your opponent is preparing a trap for you and digging a hole for you, then never, NEVER, remember, be patient and never stop him from doing this stupid thing. In the end, either he digs you a pool or he digs his own grave.
2

@lovejumanji5
6 hours ago
Well……they rolled out a test of cbdc’s in Russia already.

@AnaG-pd3ym
6 hours ago
@tayclift5322 That’s sad not amusing.It’s not their problem

@Ratnik_Svetla_1389
6 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 Can you offer proof that what you are saying is true, otherwise I will consider you an ordinary troll. If you don’t know how to help you. Take a picture of the notification that you have been banned from the channel by the channel owner and thus prove to everyone that what you claim is true. If you don’t do it within 24 hours, you will go to the block.

@marcosvidal3146
6 hours ago
@Ratnik_Svetla_1389 Oh no I never got a notification, so I’m not sure if that’s technically being banned. I just know that I typed 3-4 different comments and replies and they all disappeared INSTANTLY. I created another account (this one) and some of them seem to last.
No I can’t offer evidence of what I said above bc I didn’t even keep screenshots for myself. And I’m not saying is the judge himself banning me–probably someone managing his account

@marcosvidal3146
6 hours ago
@PerceivedREALITY999 so every dissenting opinion is childish to you just bc it’s not like yours? that’s as far as your “perceived reality” goes?

@Ratnik_Svetla_1389
5 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 And that you directly accused the judge of the ban and called him out for freedom of speech and the first amadman. Now, if you realized that you made a mistake, and it happens to everyone, including me, because people get annoyed, leave a comment and then there is no comment or they don’t get a notification. The least you can do is publicly apologize to the judge. And as far as censorship is concerned, you can search a little about it and when you see what they do, mistakes like this will no longer happen to you. I also do not receive a single notification from this channel and from a couple of other channels that present the truth.

@marcosvidal3146
5 hours ago
@Ratnik_Svetla_1389 you’re getting too excited and are missing the point–either the judge or someone working for him banned me, or blocked my ability to type any reply from my other identical account.
What was it that I had to apologize publicly for again?

@Ratnik_Svetla_1389
5 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 You said you didn’t accuse the judge of the ban, so I’m telling you you did, read your comment again. Second, if someone had banned you, you would have received a notification that you could attach as proof, which you obviously do not have, and I have already told you the causes of comments disappearing, and I have given you a suggestion on how you can find out about it. I don’t care if you apologize or not. If you cared about truth and justice as well as freedom of speech, which you defend so much, you would have already done what I suggested. You see, I care about the truth and freedom of speech, and I will always respond to comments that I believe violate one of the above.

@marcosvidal3146
4 hours ago
@Ratnik_Svetla_1389 Sounds good. Freedom of speech is good, but you know what’s even better? Civil rights of individuals, women’s rights, LGBTQ+ rights.
These guys are defending some of the most oppressive powers against peoples’ freedoms today. Liberals are fighting for those people against those powers oppressing them. You talked about justice, so –on which side are you?

@mydancinglife730
4 hours ago
@marcosvidal3146 you wrote: “the apparently friendly judge banned me from his channel, that’s how much he loves dissenting voices. Food for thought.”
It is much more likely to be YouTube than anyone working for the Judge. My comments disappear all the time, btw, sometimes when I’m in the middle of typing them.
What was the substance of your comment?

@johnnykoo6593
11 hours ago
America is falling apart
128

3 replies

@niblet112
9 hours ago
All by design
11

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
Take this time to prepare your mind for a better world and focus in that direction. The fear industry doesn’t need any more subscribers.
4

@Frank-pc2rs
6 hours ago
But the News said multiculturalism is the way to go?
4

@stevepfi1
9 hours ago
Scott Ritter- Simply the Best!
82

@johnbhoy2489
10 hours ago
Scott Ritter,Jimmy Dore and Richard Medhurst my fav people on earth right now
101

4 replies

@antoniovillanueva308
9 hours ago
Start a movement. Can we get the Judge to interview Richard Medhurst?
16

@slim1one
8 hours ago
Oh yes, Richard Medhurst!
9

@aussiedeplorable8670
7 hours ago
Colonel Mcgreger
12

@jirisalamoun2297
4 hours ago
And the Duran and Alexander Mercouris
8

@saeedsalim5195
10 hours ago
Never miss any of Scott’s interviews you’re the best
98

2 replies

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Me either..
7

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
Me too
2

@johnfarley4201
10 hours ago
NEVER EVER TRUST THE FRENCH
119

8 replies

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago

10

@christopheryellman533
9 hours ago
They make good baguettes. I will go that far.
9

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
The honesty in this comment jumps off the page. Chapeau dear sir
2

@alisarr1268
7 hours ago
Absolute truth….Lying is part of their culture…They still cannot admit that they are not relevant.
9

@julesbrunton1728
3 hours ago
Or a bigot
2

@Dot_Connectrice
2 hours ago
3

@trumanhw
2 hours ago
You know they helped us with the Revolution, right ?
2

@turanamo
2 hours ago
@trumanhw helped? lol! waving the white flag and surrendering is not helping
3

@Markjogo
10 hours ago (edited)
Scott needs to be heard everywhere .. brilliant .
51

@paulyhoffmann
8 hours ago
This was a good clip. I’m so glad that Napolitano and Ritter are around. So few who are sane.
66

@johnarmstrong5591
10 hours ago
Takes a lot to scare the shit out of this guy….. we are fucked!!!
67

3 replies

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
It may seem that way, but it only seems that way.
4

@macrostheblack2486
5 hours ago
@michaelwills1926 I think you mean, that it seems to you that it seems that way. I mean you seem to think it seems that way and that it also seems that way for others. I disagree with you.
1

@dvfallon6345
1 hour ago
Agree 100%

@abyrahman6610
11 hours ago
Scott talks, we listen!!
136

@farzanarazvi8763
10 hours ago (edited)
Nothing about this crazy world shocks, or surprises me anymore!
84

3 replies

@mikenielsen3971
10 hours ago
The best blinken is no blinken.
102

1 reply

@heimomoilanen9654
5 hours ago
Thanks Scott for speaki ng the truth. Thanks Judge
18

@fabthefab75
11 hours ago
I never thought i would witness the demise of freedom in the very country supposed to stand for it.
78

@markokeefe8859
7 hours ago
Thank you Scott, thank you Judge…..
7

@user-hc7rc5xs5z
12 hours ago
Western pride…. Russian resolve. Neither side will back down. This ends in smoke.
96

6 replies

@nirbija
9 hours ago
With much “pride” comes much cowardice: “This ends” NOT in smoke! lol
1

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
Relax, it will be over sooner than that. Western Arsenals are about empty, traffic networks are being identified and taken out along with the prime operators, ground captured that Ukr will never regain. This is a wake up for the world, we are fortunate to live in these times.
2

@naughtiusmaximus830
8 hours ago
@michaelwills1926 I am skeptical of the efficacy of the NATO nuclear arsenal. This could be a very good thing if I am right.

@VolkovVelikan
7 hours ago
Western pride ‍
4

@nirbija
6 hours ago
@VolkovVelikan
Excellent retort. lol

@vern146
5 hours ago
tnucs

@Marlago-pv9tq
9 hours ago
Scott foresight never fails
28

@PerceivedREALITY999
12 hours ago
Zelensky didn’t try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity.
In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive). Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbas.
If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbas would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements.
Who didn’t want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time.
Russia’s national security was compromised once nato began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining nato was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns.
20th September, 2021. Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO
NATO is not a defensive alliance. Nato illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter).
We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc.
Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster?
Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest.
Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland.
Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed.
Poroshenko said, “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens—theirs will hide in the basements”.
Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it.
Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine’s negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country.
Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list.
Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list.
There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbas (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence).
The azov troops trapped in the azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present.
Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but azov would not allow the civilians to leave.
Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) RIP.
The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims).
The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter.
I have done a lot of research and it took me a long time to write this comment. I have stated a lot of facts and I have given my honest opinion.
I have provided a brief summary of events that took place. In order to explain this whole situation in great detail, a book would need to be written.
Hopefully someone will write an UNBIASED book, stating facts and allowing the readers to form their own judgments. Everything I said can be fact checked and verified.
181

36 replies

@Jo-sp5cp
12 hours ago
Excellent summary.
23

@chadwolf5596
11 hours ago
14

@georgesbv1
11 hours ago (edited)
1. Russia supported the breakaway regions (Crimea, DPR, LPR) and declared them indepedent.
2. Yanukovych traitor regime commited to stop entering EU or NATO instead of CSTO/CIS (a masked USSR) in spite of Ukrainian population and parliament.
3. Odessa events were started by the death by gunshot of 2 Ukrainian ethnics by unknown snipers.
The investigation revealed that the shooter was led to escape by the former deputy chief of Osesa Police, now a Russian citizen.
Odessa incident was staged to open a new front or to help in the referendums in LPR/DPR.
4. The so called 8 year of shelling is bullishit. aFter Minsk 2 there were some skirmishes (hundreds of soldiers died on both sides), but there was a relative ceasefire.
In 2020-2021 there were a handful of civilian victims most due to unexploded ordanance or landmines.
5. Minsk was never honored by the terrorists in DPR / LPR or Russia.
Neutrality cannot be kept if Russia kept meddling into the affairs of Ukraine and even started a ful invasion.
6. Russia wanted surrender, not peace. US and UK kept their world on Budapest Memorandum to defend Ukraine. And NATO partners followed.
7. “Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable.”
This applies both ways. Russia supported the terrorists in DPR/LPR/Crimea. Check Igor Girkin, FSB colonel present in many of the initial attacks (forcing Crimean deputies to vote for seccesion, Slovyansk, MH17, Ilovaisk).
8. Defender Europe was a massive NATO exercise (30k troops), but it happened from March to June 2021 – some troops from Ukraine were invited. Every single equipment and the troops left.
Russia organized the Zapad-2021 in September 2021 on multiple borders of Ukraine. The 200k troops remained mobilized on Russia and Belarus on Ukraine border including their equipment.
9. No definitive proof on NS pipeline explosions.
NS1 was stopped by Russkies on bogus reason (a turbine leaking oil), trying to blame on a german company in Canada.
NS2 was never opened and used by Russia as a gas depot.
One may think Russia tried to cause a gas price blackmail, but they failed.
10. Zelensky banned formed pro-russian traitors, not all the opposition (it usually happens during wars).
11. Orthodox church priests usually support the invasion. This is a traitorous act so those priests cannot serve anymore and they can go to trial.
12. Read the full speech of Poroshenko, not just the Russkie cut.
13. Myrotvorets is not a hit list, but a list of people that are against Ukrainian cause. This means that they are persona-nongrata and they will not to be cited by Ukrainian media.
if they are caught they will suffer the consequences of their actions.
14. Russia can never be trusted.
15. Daria Dugina was a Russian propagandist like her father. She even posed in the tunnel beneath Azovstal after Russian occupation.
Assasination of Russian invaders and traitors are normal. Some even had outstanding prison indictment.
16. Passing Ukraine border into Crimea is a crime, so this is on the ones who built the bridge.
3

@alexxela9502
11 hours ago
I also previously published a detailed analysis of what preceded this conflict, I will duplicate it – So, (after the Democrats came to power in the United States in early 2021) Ukraine is preparing for military action against Donbass, and then Crimea, after Zelensky March 24, 2021 signed Decree #117/2121 – “to put into effect the NSDC doctrine…” – (adopted by the NSDC of Ukraine on March 11) – “we will return Donbass and Crimea at any cost, including by military force,” although they only had to fulfill the Minsk agreements. And echelons with military equipment were sent from the west of Ukraine to the east (there are these videos from ukraine on YouTube)
Russian, organizes military exercises on, and then leaves part of the contingent there on the western border (making it clear to Ukraine that it will not allow the destruction of Donbass, and to conduct military operations in autumn and winter is fraught for Ukraine) in August 2021, the CIA director comes to Moscow to clarify Russia’s plans (apparently Washington’s plans were violated) in December 2021, Putin out with a proposal to the United States to agree on security on on the Russian borders (because Putin understands where the plans for Ukraine’s military operation were built, given that the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine is appointed not a military but a lawyer with close contacts with international /American foundations Minister of Defense Mr. Reznikov),
Putin is given to understand, that his proposals on security are not being considered, then Russia on February 24, 2022 (when the activity of shelling of Donbass from Ukraine began to increase exponentially (there is a summary by days) and Zelensky in Munich on February 19, 2022, said that Ukraine wants to denance the Budapest memorandum – which means to host nuclear weapons, especially since all the competencies were available and given Zelensky’s young team, managed from outside, where Ukraine was prepared as a battering ram against Russia, and sanctions were planned in advance – begins a military operation with small forces, everything is logical…
12

@alexxela9502
11 hours ago
This is also from that dialogue with the American – I also had a dialogue on this topic earlier I will duplicate – Let me remind you that the United States committed a coup in Ukraine (at that moment in February 2014, close contacts in Kiev (there is a video) took place between Victoria Nullond, John McCain, the American ambassador and the Ukrainian opposition. As a result, after signing the declaration with President Yanukovych on early elections (which were signed under the guarantees of Germany, France and Poland), the police were removed from the streets and the next morning the opposition began to occupy administrative buildings (everyone was deceived), fearing reprisals, Yanukovych was forced to flee the country.
Immediately after the coup, on the first day of the Ukrainian parliament, the law “on the status of the Russian language” was adopted, Crimea and Donbass were categorically opposed, the Crimean parliament adopted a resolution on holding a referendum (since Crimea was an autonomy within Ukraine), and Donbass asked the “new authorities” of nationalists for autonomy or federalization (to preserve its Russian culture, its language and the memory of its ancestors (the “new Ukraine” turned the story even about the WW2). But in return for this request, tanks were sent to Donbass, and until 2022, 12,000 people were sent to God by Ukrainian nationalists.
Сrimea held a referendum and “returned home” to Russia. No one seized Crimea under the lease agreement of the Black Sea base, Russia had the right to keep 25,000 military personnel in Crimea, at the time of the known events there were 22,000 of them and not a single shot was fired. And now compare this situation with the separation of Kosovo from Serbia, where the United States (through Hillary Clinton) in June 2010, through the UN court, pushed through a decree on the separation of Kosovo from the sovereign country of Serbia (and the situation there was legally more complicated), and then safely built there a large American military base in the Balkans. This is more than a precedent in relation to Crimea.
The Minsk agreements, both the first and the second did not imply the “withdrawal of Russian troops” do not lie, because there were no Russian troops there, it was about disarming the militia! There were clearly spelled out points that had to be carried out strictly in order, for example, the first part of the second Minsk agreements had to be fulfilled by Ukraine and only then (general elections, the adoption of provisions of general jurisdiction and the last point – control of the Donbass-Russia border), but Ukraine began to turn everything upside down (and the West helped it in this), that they say the clauses of the agreements can be “mixed up”, this despite the fact that there is clearly written about the order of implementation. And one more thing – Russia is not a party to the conflict, so it legally had to do nothing (as you are trying to imagine here).
But this is not the main thing, but the main thing is that in the same year in 1999, NATO launched an aggressive campaign against Russia’s ally, Serbia, as well as Western intelligence fueled separatism in Chechnya under the guise of Islamic scholarship – Wahhabism, where thousands of Chechens were simply deceived (let me remind you that the Chechen militants were commanded by a native of Qatar Khattab) and later The Chechens themselves “saw through” that they were brutally used against their own country and Mufti Ahmad Kadyrov ended this war (now his son is in charge of Chechnya).
And in 2003, the United States generally withdrew from the ABM treaty and began building anti-missile bases in Romania and Poland, brazenly deceiving Russia that the bases were being built from Iran (and later they themselves admitted that Iran had nothing to do with it), then there was the destruction of Iraq, then Libya and aggression in Syria.
So what do you want, showing your “grin” and when you deceive the whole world that you allegedly have good intentions, and you yourself are conducting an aggressive policy by clamping Russia (the pantry of the planet, on whose territory there are all chemical elements) into a military ring and reproaching the strong president of Russia (who is fighting for the sovereignty of the country, unlike from the 90s, when Russia “lay” under the West) in its autocracy?
And in 2003, the United States generally withdrew from the ABM treaty and began building anti-missile bases in Romania and Poland, brazenly deceiving Russia that the bases were being built from Iran (and later they themselves admitted that Iran had nothing to do with it), then there was the destruction of Iraq, then Libya and aggression in Syria.
those who run America thought that Russia in the 90s had gone into oblivion and would never return, and you would so like to “divide it into pieces” (like the collapse of the USSR) and take control of this resource-rich territory. But you have shown your aggressive intentions in the Middle East and all over the world
14

@georgesbv1
11 hours ago
​ @Jo-sp5cp yes, I know the trurh.
I live near the conflict. Do you?
1

@alexxela9502
11 hours ago
There was also a dispute over the Budapest Memorandum – I will tell you about the Budapest Memorandum, which the United States likes to “wave” about Ukraine’s renunciation of nuclear weapons in 1994 –
Ex-President of Ukraine Leonid Kravchuk in an interview with the German agency Deutsche Welle said that the Budapest Memorandum was only a formality, since in fact Kiev was powerless.
In principle, Ukraine did not have the opportunity to maintain the existence of its nuclear weapons, since if missiles were produced in Ukraine (and also required substantial funds to maintain the world’s third largest nuclear arsenal in a safe and combat-ready position at that time), then nuclear charges were produced in Russia. And more importantly, the entire nuclear weapons control system was located in Russia and Ukraine did not have access to it
It would have cost us $65 billion (53 billion euros), and the state coffers were empty
— Kravchuk declared.
In addition, the West threatened Ukraine with isolation, as nuclear-armed missiles on the territory of Ukraine were directed at the United States. Therefore, the only possible solution, according to Kravchuk, was to give up weapons. It should be recognized that these guarantees were only a formality, since no sanctions mechanisms were created at that time. German journalist and expert on Ukraine Winfried Schneider-Deters agrees, saying DW: “The agreement is not worth the paper it was written on.” The missiles were taken to Russia or destroyed, and in return, the Ukrainian authorities received financial assistance from the United States, cheap energy from Russia and guarantees prescribed in the memorandum
Former US Ambassador to Ukraine Steven Pifer, who participated in the signing of the memorandum, commented on the content of the document and its terms:
The English text of the memorandum contains the word “assurances”, that is, “assurances of support”, but not “guarantees” (guarantees). This is an important difference. For example, our NATO allies have security guarantees. South Korea and Japan, with which the United States has concluded agreements on joint defense, have guarantees
In the case of Ukraine, we are talking about assurances. This is a less powerful word. Secondly, the memorandum did not specify a mechanism for retaliatory actions, except for an appeal to the UN Security Council if nuclear weapons are used against Ukraine
— Steven Pifer (according to the 112 Ukraine agency)
The United States publicly stated in 2013 that “the Memorandum is not legally binding”, calling it a “political commitment”
8

@johnbhoy2489
11 hours ago
So articulate and well presented
5

@parklee7659
11 hours ago
Bro thank u it’s been a long couple of years
2

@Jo-sp5cp
11 hours ago
@georgesbv1 you are very clearly partisan.
1

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago
@alexxela9502 the status of lease for Sevastopol port was not threatened by ousting of traitor Yanukovych. Even if the traitor signed the latest lease himself.
And for sure not the Russian military posted there.
1

@alexxela9502
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 Let’s take it all in order!
1- Russia declared the independence of Donbass on February 23, 2022 and on February 24, a military campaign began! In other words, you were given a chance to negotiate with Donbass, but you decided to “break them through the knee” (below I wrote what preceded Russia’s military operation in Ukraine)
2- Yanukovych took a break from joining the EU (no need to lie – Ukraine’s accession to NATO was not considered at all at that moment) He took a break for one reason – Ukraine was not ready to change internal technical regulations to become an EU member because Europe did not give money for this, and there the question was about tens of billions of dollars, since the replacement of everything from medical standards according to EU standards to the replacement of technical regulations in machine-building production (which in fact doomed 40% enterprises of Ukraine)
3- You probably wrote about the events in Odessa while typing on the keyboard! A rally with the installation of tents at the House of trade unions. it was planned in Odessa in advance and also in advance the so-called “titushki” from the western regions of Ukraine began to arrive in Odessa (these are those young nationalists who previously beat up the rally in Kharkiv and Mariupol) after which they gathered on two streets near the square and went to the protesters burning tents and driving them out of the house of trade unions and then cynically set fire to and those who jumped out of windows were beaten with sticks and also shot at windows where people asked for help (there are these videos on YouTube)
4- Is the Donbass region nonsense? The Alley of Angels in Donetsk is dedicated to the children whom Ukraine sent to God (there are more than 100 fimilias – look at this. on the Internet) “Gorlovka Madonna” – a girl with a one-year-old child in her arms fell asleep in an embrace in Gorlovka Park – is this nonsense? Did Ukraine refuse to comply with the Minsk agreements, Zelensky stated? and Merkel also stated in December 2022 to a German newspaper that the Minsk agreements were needed for Ukraine to strengthen its potential!
5= Russia reached an agreement with Ukraine in April 2022, but the West threw Ukraine into the furnace of war!
7- You say everything is right – creating security in spite of the security of your neighbor is unacceptable! Imagine that children are playing on your lawn and dogs of the fighting breed are running around on the lawn of the neighboring house without a muzzle! Boeing shot down ukran and not the Shooters! The Malaysian Prime Minister said at a press conference in Japan in 2018 that there are a lot of politics and unclear points in this tragedy! Let me remind you – it was the Donbass militia who found the black boxes and handed them over to Malaysian specialists, although the rebels could (there in the gray zone where the Boeing fell) plow everything with artillery, as the Ukrainians did for a long time, but the commission was able to collect some of the debris for the investigation!
The 8th one replied to us in a previous message!
9- gas pipelines were blown up by the USA in order to sever the connection between Russia and Europe and weaken technological competitors in Europe (now German enterprises are moving to the USA) There was no point in Russia manipulating prices, since the Nord Stream concern included European shareholders, among others!
10-Persecution of the opposition began in Ukraine until 2022 – objectionable TV channels were closed and journalists who had their own opinions (Such as Olesya Buzina and Babitsky) were shot in the streets!
11= The priests of the Kiev Pechersk Lavra did not express their position at all! Don’t lie! Religion is separated from the state! But for some reason, President Prorshenko began the persecution of the pro-Orthodox in Ukarin!
12- The Peacemaker website is in fact a list of people sentenced by the Kiev authorities to execution, some of them were killed!
13= Daria Dugina was the daughter of Philosopher – Professor Dugin, who clearly stated what is “white and what is black” in the events in Ukraine since 2014 and politics
11

@delatroy
10 hours ago
Your comments get deleted?
1

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago
@alexxela9502 lol, Boeing shot down the airplane although DPR terrorists praised themselves to the score.
1

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@Jo-sp5cp Thank you, it’s my honor and my privilege to tell the truth.
3

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@delatroy Many comments are hidden/deleted.
1

@genrcflyer
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 Yeah, well I watched the events in Ukraine and Eastern Europe ever since the end of the USSR and the West needed to respect Russia’s security concerns from the start. Big mistake!
5

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@alexxela9502 Thanks for sharing.
2

@genrcflyer
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 Are you being evacuated?

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 You posted many baseless allegations and lies. What do you hope to achieve?
5

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago
@alexxela9502 the death toll of the war prior to Russian full scale invasion since 2022 was about 14500.
– 300 foreign civilians, mostly in MH17 shot down by DPR terrorists using Buk-1 missile system provided by Russia (back traced on satellite)
– 3000 civilians that Russians claimed all were Russian ethnics, supporters, the works (although a terrorist rarely wears an uniform)
– 4500 Ukrainian military
– 6000 separatists/terrorists
– 500 Russian mercenaries or special forces trained to sabotage, instigate to civil war, etc

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 Ukraine was supposed to adopt a law recognizing the autonomous republics of LPR and DPR (Minsk agreements), but Ukraine refused to do so.
5

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago (edited)
@PerceivedREALITY999 which is a lie? Combating the Russian propaganda you posted, that’s my goal

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 “Ukrainian President Zelenskyy banned the activities of political opposition parties in the country.” – Business Insider
3

@PerceivedREALITY999
10 hours ago
@georgesbv1 Yanukovych agreed to early elections (2014). Why not wait for the elections?
4

@georgesbv1
10 hours ago
@PerceivedREALITY999 lpr/dpr never expelled foreign military be it Russians, Serbian, Chechen, Afghan or whatever. Also the LPR /DPR terrorists didn’t hand over the border
1

@tayclift5322
10 hours ago
​ @georgesbv1 Do you think all this is worth the potential of a nuclear war? Also where does your hatred for Russia come from?
6

@ikeanderson6466
8 hours ago
No lies were told
1

@hansjorgkunde3772
8 hours ago
@georgesbv1 full of hatred
4

@vern146
5 hours ago
@georgesbv1 your so full of it
2

@vern146
5 hours ago
@PerceivedREALITY999 some people just cant handle the truth can they
1

@vern146
5 hours ago
perfectly put!
1

@PerceivedREALITY999
5 hours ago
@georgesbv1 You seek comfort in subjective reality and ignore all the facts.
3

@PerceivedREALITY999
5 hours ago
@georgesbv1 What would have happened if zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality? Obviously it’s too late now.
2

@georgesbv1
2 hours ago
@vern146 i know, full of truth

@georgesbv1
2 hours ago
@genrcflyer Russian security concerns? What about the security concerns of countries previously occupied by murderous Russia?

@davidcox8945
11 hours ago
Major Ritter!
29

@ibrahimdihum9127
9 hours ago
Thank you Scott for telling the truth about the situation today and imminent dangers around the world and for that you have great respect form must people
Thank you Judge keep up the great work God bless you and people like you
21

@Aaron28999
11 hours ago
Putin has that good-natured tolerance of true leadership. i wish we had Putin-like presidents in Africa
71

7 replies

@user-uc2yn6tk5o
10 hours ago
2000-2008 Putin Was top notch leader, now hes a bit to autocratic imo
1

@Aaron28999
9 hours ago

@user-uc2yn6tk5o Putin loves and defends his country. He’s a faithful patriot to the Russian spirit. Use ur noddle mate, there are other political systems and forms of governments in the world, nothing wrong with that
8

@halifaxeh
8 hours ago
You’re the one that needs to use your noodle! lol

@urrywest
8 hours ago
I think there are some…

@Aaron28999
8 hours ago

@urrywest We had Gaddafi in Africa, the best leader ever, NATO slayed him, while the rest of African states keepin an eye on the murder of their champion, warmongers tryna do same to Putin
3

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
We have as many are not war like and evil like in America and Europe
1

@vern146
5 hours ago
@user-uc2yn6tk5o you mean in 20 years he turned russia back into a super power and still has 90% aproval rating ?
3

@Neumann1311
11 hours ago
I love the comments of Scott. He is talking “Klartext” as we say in my mother tongue.
49

5 replies

@yvonneforsman8649
10 hours ago
You should tell your politicians, now that Sweden is part of NATO! The question is: do they understand “klartext”?
6

@Neumann1311
10 hours ago
​@yvonneforsman8649 I don’t know how it works in your country but in mine politicians don’t listen to their voters (Annalena Baerbock: “… egal was meine Wähler denken …’)
6

@user-uc2yn6tk5o
10 hours ago
@Neumann1311 mal sehen was nächste Wahl passiert. International betrachtet sind afd und bsw wohl am pragmatischsten.
3

@idubzh243
4 hours ago
@Neumann1311 same in France.

@Dot_Connectrice
3 hours ago
Genau greetings from Holland

@luzhiratsuka4151
8 hours ago
Thanks Scott I agree with you 99% my blessinfs
8

@chrisman234
11 hours ago
Right on Mr Ritter, you have called it right.
52

@jebjeb1498
11 hours ago
Thank you, Scott.
30

@MindfulFactology
11 hours ago
Putin is the last man on earth you want know if he can do what he says!
50

1 reply

@User-bruser891
2 hours ago
So far, in 23 years, he has done exactly what he has said. Why should it be any different this time around?
1

@dvfallon6345
1 hour ago
Myself and friends are praying everyday for ourselves, family & friends+ all of Humanity.
2

@Ghandi12
4 hours ago
Scott thank you for your voice in the fight for humankind.
25

@ismatnaquib600
11 hours ago
Very dangerous time. People wake up else we all be gone.
39

@jasonbourne3869
6 hours ago
Scott, you are the MAN! Love your analysis!
5

@user-ki5jt7wf8s
10 hours ago
Scott for President 2024
38

1 reply

@buckshot704
8 hours ago
Two assumptions there. One: voting matters. Two: the neocons would allow competition. Neither is valid.
2

@roslyntchakedjian927
10 hours ago
Thank you Gentlemen excellent as always. Good Day
8

@iamiam2994
10 hours ago
Make Peace in your heart. Hold your loved ones.
It just may take Putin to clear the swamp.
35

@hosseinmohammadi4574
10 hours ago
They are afraid of the truth. This could be the title. Great work Scott
22

@mkshffr4936
8 hours ago
Never thought I would be in agreement with Bernie!
6

@johnfarley4201
11 hours ago
FREE SPEECH IS FREE SPEECH.
32

@marchay550
7 hours ago (edited)
scott, you hit it right on the nose in the end , thank you both.
6

@kurtmontgomery9719
9 hours ago
Good job Scott on the French accent
10

@therencemeton4696
11 hours ago
you gotta love this guy….Scottt…love this guy, the way he broke down and articulate things
39

1 reply

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Yes
3

@adrianthompson7033
8 hours ago
It is always good to hear Scott’s wisdom.
3

@ShortbusMooner
11 hours ago
Thank you, gentlemen!
23

@LonelyRanger902
9 hours ago
Scott should put it simply. What would you do if your country was going to be attacked by 30 other nations?
44

@robertohlrich369
10 hours ago
May God have mercy on US
9

@steveogle3679
11 hours ago
This country is done. Secession now.
43

2 replies

@JFF35753
9 hours ago
I am a Texan. I am all for it and have been for awhile. Texas needs to become a nation NOW!!!
8

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
The greatest irony is that we only ever needed to decide that these idiots have no control over us. Never knew it this whole time. Now we know
3

@roshanmashoor766
8 hours ago
For the first time since beginning of this crisis I’m really terrified about a nuclear war
9

@michaelmakarevich601
6 hours ago
Guys, thank you for trying to save us all!
2

@myrachurchman5013
11 hours ago
Pride comes before the fall.
50

2 replies

@LindaKieltyka-sm8ge
11 hours ago
So true…pride and greed.
9

@genrcflyer
10 hours ago
Here that Zelensky?
5

@dankurz7675
10 hours ago
Heaven help us.
10

@toscabrutus1781
9 hours ago
Scott is Briljant! Hy is baie slim! Groete uit LIma Peru!
8

2 replies

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
Bly jy daar nou
1

@toscabrutus1781
6 hours ago
@Faiez-rh1gm Faiez Ja ek bly nou hier! Intressante plek! Groete!

@destab8971
11 hours ago
You are absolutely true
Humanity existence is in jeopardy
35

@samikhal5455
11 hours ago
I love your channel. thanks for sharing the truth.
18

@Just_username_3161
11 hours ago
Scott awesome as always.
37

@alexanderaghayan117
9 hours ago
Scott is thoughtful and wise. His warning has to be taken very seriously
34

@AxelWeber-gx2yt
11 hours ago (edited)
I suspect the French have a false opinion of themselves when it comes to military issues. They have lost all the major wars in the last 150 years, but were elevated to the winner’s podium by the US support and involvement in WWI and WWII. They don’t seem to have learned from their past and think they are strong winners, which they are not. A distorted view of reality can have devastating consequences.
93

10 replies

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
I agree with you
10

@darknessrising7385
10 hours ago
There were a few more countries involved than just the USA in those wars. France did the majority of fighting in ww1 and didn’t yield. The were steamrolled by an army no one had seen before in ww2, but they still contributed as best they could. Better to respect all people regardless of their nation than to claim superiority over others.
9

@JamesGonzalez-em9un
9 hours ago
France absolutely did not lose all their major wars. Go to the wikipedia page on “wars involving france” and look at all of the green.
4

@peppybocan
9 hours ago
imagine Russian army marching in Paris again. That did happen not that long ago.
4

@giovanhagar
8 hours ago
The USA hasn’t won a war since ww2, either.
11

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
Were chased out of Africa too with America out of Niger
5

@macanngantuk1439
7 hours ago
​ @JamesGonzalez-em9un “involving” means even sending 50 troops you got the shared trophy
1

@AnaG-pd3ym
6 hours ago
@Faiez-rh1gm Yes that’s the Macron hate over Russia.

@vern146
6 hours ago
@JamesGonzalez-em9un and wikipedia is not bias at all are they ….

@heimomoilanen9654
5 hours ago
French learned nothing from Napoleon wars. Nothing.
1

@fritzkinderhoffen2369
9 hours ago
First I heard Bernie Sanders give that speech. My respect for him is increased. Scott’s important criticism of his speech with standing. Young people the future is yours more than ours. It is a time to act as best you can to save yourselves from these mad men. It will only get worse if you stand down.
7

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
4 hours ago
Why is it on the young, it is on all of us, yes? Everyone with a conscience who can see what’s going on.
1

@234currency
7 hours ago
Scott tells it like it is no sugar coating bottom line we are quickly seeing a very dangerous situation kick into a higher gear.
8

@garyodom474
11 hours ago
Well now…its about time that somebody sounds the alarm about how close we are to the brink of nuclear war…I know there have been some, like Tulsi Gabbard and a few others as well, but Scott has a way of driving it home. I hope people take him seriously.
40

1 reply

@genrcflyer
10 hours ago
I went with two of my grandsons to see Oppenheimer. Watching the crowd leaving, there was no indication that anyone was concerned. I never hear a word spoken about Ukraine here in central US unless I bring it up.
3

@mushchina6749
9 hours ago
Scott is the man!
27

@sidenbigh8832
10 hours ago
Keep it up Judge!
13

@mohammadmossayebi2609
8 hours ago
Thanks judge and mr Ritter to getting to roots of problem.
14

@danielhopwood5985
11 hours ago
the billionaires did not build their nuclear bunkers just incase,
45

4 replies

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
In Hawaii, they might be flooded out though
11

@danielhopwood5985
10 hours ago
@aidanmacdougall9250 wouldnt that be a pitty
6

@rhetorical1488
10 hours ago
best place to get fresh food
2

@fleurstarable
4 hours ago
New Zealand so many
NY of them.. but need to fly in… Li Ka Shing… so many. Waiheke & South Island. They need to be able to get in

@mikeholness3860
11 hours ago
Sad, really, isn’t it? The whole situation is just sad.
14

@farzanarazvi8763
10 hours ago
Glad Bernie is awake now!
4

@johnfarley4201
11 hours ago
God bless you Judge. God bless you Scott.
21

@WESTLOSPROS
7 hours ago
Excellent as always
Love Major Ritter
Thank you Judge. Safe Travels
7

@franceslynch2615
4 hours ago
One of your best you two, thank you!!!
1

@Cooee1961
7 hours ago
That’s what makes Putin such a great leader. He always tells the truth. And he doesn’t back down.
23

@mikeholness3860
11 hours ago
This talk of nuclear war is becoming more commonplace on a daily basis. THAT is scary.
44

5 replies

@stepheneurosailor1623
10 hours ago
Why do you think all the billionaires have huge underground bunkers in remote parts of the world do they know something we don’t?
7

@malcolmt7883
10 hours ago
@stepheneurosailor1623 Of course, as soon as it happens, money will be as useless as tits on a two headed bull.
4

@michaelwills1926
8 hours ago
Don’t give it your energy. It survives and thrives on the thought form energy of real people. Yes it’s that simple.
2

@istudios225
26 minutes ago
@malcolmt7883 LOL!! Never herad of that analogy but LOVE it!

@istudios225
15 minutes ago
@michaelwills1926 Yes, this is true. Our thoughts create our reality. Our positive collective thoughts will render the negative collective thoughts of the population weaker, powerless and ineffective. Our thoughts alone can manifest the outcome we want.

@scififan698
9 hours ago
I think the Russians actually mean it and are not only ready but also prepared.
21

2 replies

@thulomanchay
7 hours ago
Gotta make sure those nukes don’t fall back on themselves, like the Tridents.

@geoattoronto
4 hours ago
Russian rockets actually consistently work.

@mackeyswenson9312
13 minutes ago
Mr Ritter ,you have my deepest respect for telling the truth.

@laneboucher509
11 hours ago
great video Judge and Scott
15

@sentapt8387
11 hours ago (edited)
Judge, you should really invite Dr. Norman Finklestein, a fellow Princetonian, to your Channel. No one is better equipped to address issues on Gaza than him.
24

1 reply

@mayamichelle6741
5 hours ago
True. But I think it would be hard to contain NF in JN’s 35 minute format.
1

@mik823
5 hours ago
Scott Ritter for president
7

@billcarpenter5271
3 hours ago
Thank you Judge, excellent Scott & the Amazing team !

@betweendrinks8885
9 hours ago
This guy is chilling in his truth
30

@gorancucko1437
10 hours ago
EXCELLENT SHOW, SCOTT RITTER IS AN EXCELLENT ANALYST AND A GREAT MAN IN EVERY WAY.
18

@maxkazzora4234
6 hours ago
For me, the most scary reality scenario has just been explained by the judge. Thanks for having Scott Ritter on a regular basis.
7

@hamayoonshah1990
11 hours ago
Feeling pity for these Ukrainian boys who are dying for an American puppet Zelensky
28

@tarwingrill4531
11 hours ago
Why the US government is cracking down on free speach? Simple answer: They got ordered to do so by Nat.
35

@veroniquedelphi7689
11 hours ago
Judge every single show you put on today was stellar. I can’t believe our country was taken over by a small supremacist cult. Safe travels en Italia, my second favorite destination (after Greece).
32

@CastleHassall
11 hours ago
if the Russians want to get rid of the UK politicians (except Bridgen) WITHOUT harming any of the population they would probably find that the majority of the UK population would thank them..i of course would be very upset by them doing this but I’ve noticed a lot of people are sick of the UK politicians but there are no alternatives for us
40

4 replies

@artyerlich3514
8 hours ago
Australia is in a similar situation.
6

@ikeanderson6466
8 hours ago
Greeting from your friends in Alberta, Canada. El Salvador is looking better and better, might go there. Not sure if you read the Bible but check out Revelation Chapter 6, if im correct the 2/3/4seals about to open before 2026. When Israel signs peace treaty with neighbours starts countdown 7yr or less till 6th seal.
4

@ikeanderson6466
8 hours ago
@artyerlich3514 Give the rest of your life to serve the Lord JC and you will get 7yr in Heaven for wedding feast and 1000yr with JC on the new Earth, that’s the deal. Pretty clear2me we are near the end of this age.

@typeorulz
6 hours ago (edited)
Absolutely agree with you–we could use a reset here in US.

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Love listening to Scott..tells it straight..tells it true. God bless you and yours.
Macron is a fool, what on earth is he thinking ??
25

@katerinak4164
1 hour ago
So well said by Scott Ritter!

@jameswithrow1685
8 hours ago
Pride before the fall
5

@JohnnyYounitas
11 hours ago
Well it’s 6 months late but Bernie has finally figured it out. I guess better late than never..
13

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
4 hours ago
He still cannot say genocide, though. Pity that.

@kroschelfilms
10 hours ago
Scott Ritter delivers the cold, hard, brutal truth today, May 6th, 2024………..Basically, are we all ready to meet God ? …. I feel there isn’t much time left. For anyone.
12

1 reply

@ikeanderson6466
7 hours ago
Our entire Universe exists as intelligent energy as a spark between neurons in God’s brain. God is not restricted by physics or time like we are. God loves you.
1

@user-dz8ww7tj8j
9 hours ago
As always … Very..very..Good conversation both of you…
2

@nailz4325
3 hours ago
Judge Nap is the man. I imagine he golfs during the mornings and then does his amazing show for all of us after his round. Keep em coming Judge! Thank you!

@Usamak1
8 hours ago
Every word spoken on this show has the clang and drang of truth, the most accurate and focused view of reality, the sleepwalking toward the dreaded, derided Mutually Assured Destruction. Says this returned Peace Corpsman.
3

@williamtyndale1402
11 hours ago
If you want to know who owns you look to who you are forbidden to criticize
26

3 replies

@michaelashley2855
11 hours ago
Aaagh

@niblet112
10 hours ago
Look who owns the MSM.
2

@kenwilson-zy8qv
2 hours ago
Surely not the Smiters?

@carlomariamosco
1 minute ago
Thanks to Napolitano and Ritter for offering us an unbiased information

@mariaheredia6822
3 hours ago
Scott Ritter as always is on point

@MC-1976Mei
10 hours ago
The US & NATO better learn to coexist with other major powers before it’s game-over.
6

@marqbeatty2694
6 hours ago
Nailed it Scott; it’s a free-speech matter…..
7

@sharonhitchcock6656
9 hours ago
$4.99
Thanks!
2

@bradroy8902
9 hours ago
Love the ones your with folks,,,,,I sure hope those the made us step in and stop this madness and dispose of the maniacs pretending to be in power.
2

@hassanqanbari8531
11 hours ago
Thanks
3

@CastleHassall
11 hours ago
china was not visiting france to see the scenery.. it must have been a final warning to Macron from Russia via China
29

3 replies

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago

2

@TTP16.4
10 hours ago
You are dead right!
6

@mydancinglife730
4 hours ago
With a bit of sweetener…China saying “help us stop this madness and we can trade, you don’t have to lose everything and we will help you shift your economy”.

@jimdemetri8168
11 hours ago
Madness all for ukraine?? Seriously
11

2 replies

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Was thinking the same
1

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
Aye just hand it to the Russians, it ain’t worth it.
1

@WORKOUTSOLUTIONS
11 hours ago
CHRIST IS RISEN
BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS
12

@lrww5673
11 hours ago
Ritter came out swinging in this one. Scary stuff. I respect him immensely, but hope he’s wrong about the nukes flying. Good Lord.
25

@thereisnofork
8 hours ago
There is a reason it’s called “Russian roulette”. They don’t chicken out. Don’t try this bs with them, you will lose.
13

@user-qm1jl1iq8l
2 hours ago
Bravo Scott

@davidwong1848
1 hour ago
Scott you are always spot on

@aynhiayraadr6599
7 hours ago
AIPAC has burned the american dream to the ground
6

1 reply

@wadegoodwin6773
10 hours ago
Macron is a madman…….
17

4 replies

@user-uc2yn6tk5o
10 hours ago
He’s French…

@niblet112
9 hours ago
He’s a puppet of the madmen
6

@CRRVENI
7 hours ago
You have to shut him down all all of you will be…There have no much Time.. Regards
2

@vern146
5 hours ago
and a tnuc
2

@deguldenmiddenweg895
40 minutes ago
Thanks judge, and Scott

@kraz007
11 hours ago
Nothing like a Scott rant
17

@rolflagerquist8514
12 hours ago
Love is the highest energy vibration in the multiverse.
“Love withheld is a Burdened Heart”, I pass my LOVE to All.
22

4 replies

@mariaangelicabrunellsolar7086
11 hours ago
Wisdom!
2

@stephengeorge3507
11 hours ago
Agree, LOVE NEVER FAILS,BUT WITH THE LEADERSHIP IN AMERICA,EUROPE, IT MIGHT NOT BE ENOUGH TOO RESCUE MILLONS. LOL
2

@michaelashley2855
11 hours ago
Huh ?

@aidanmacdougall9250
11 hours ago
Love can stop your fear
Fear can stop your lovin’

@keithnorris6348
10 hours ago
All my resources are taken up with the study of the Russian position and I have to say that I agree with Mr Ritter. The western powers do not seem to have a good understanding of the requirements of the Russians nor of the ` grass roots ` sentiment of the British people. As for the Israel situation, other than the disproportionate response the dynamic is to complex to follow and see a likely out come. So yes I am worried that with no change of course visible in the situation it will degenerate to disaster level.
8

@joannesavage3709
3 hours ago
Thankgoodness for the sound reasoning and incredible exerience and knowledge of Scott Ritter

@leehawkins8599
2 hours ago
Great show as always with Scott, Safe travels Judge , Boun Viaggio

@kp-wp8tx
11 hours ago
Scott still didn’t answer what happens if a F-16, with a nuclear warhead, is shot down.
8

2 replies

@Handmemoretramadol
9 hours ago
If you mean will it cause a nuclear explosion ,no it won’t
2

@mydancinglife730
4 hours ago
They generally do not arm the warheads until they are about to release them from the plane. So, it will likely just be a tricky recovery operation.
1

@mousiebrown1747
11 hours ago
I’m reminded of the last scenes of “Dr Strangelove”———. YEE HAHHH!
7

1 reply

@geetee2694
8 hours ago
Nuclear Rodeo.
1

@wtf_usa5597
7 hours ago (edited)
It’s gotten to the point where EVERYBODY is afraid to say ANYTHING, especially about the current middle-east situation. THIS HAS TO STOP!!!!
1

@billkeidan270
8 minutes ago
Bravo, Scott: You are responsibly warning these idiots. I wonder if they will pull back in time?

@mingthemerciless6855
10 hours ago
The issue of Free Speech is a ruse. It’s the Israeli PAC threatening any Legislator who hints at criticizing Israel actions against the Palestinians. Wasn’t a Michigan Legislator who openly criticized Israel lost his primary. That’s why…
8

@fleurstarable
5 hours ago
Thankyou Gentleman.
1

@maxmurphy7306
5 hours ago
While you’re at it.
Send all members of congress to the front lines .
1

@icecoldyellowredbull
7 hours ago
“ this is life or death for Russia “
That line means they ARE NOT playing. West is really playing Russian roulette
3

@bonanzaguy1
11 hours ago
Russians don’t bluff
10

1 reply

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
100%
1

@Rickmaxi
5 hours ago
Analysis spot on as ever.. Thank you both.. The problem with the usa is … NONE of their wars were faught on THEIR territory…. Could Putin change that ??
2

1 reply

@maryk4588
2 hours ago
Revolutionary & Civil War.

@user-zx1ir7jt4c
2 hours ago
I love Scott. This guy is the real deal and we NEED him delivering this message to congress AND the American people because Americans are zonked out watching Netflix and popping pills!

@fatmah9916
11 hours ago
Sir you forgot to ask him about Rafah
6

@thethinkingman9338
11 hours ago
The higher gold goes, the closer to the end game we get
4

1 reply

@niblet112
10 hours ago
100%

@averagelibertyenjoyer3217
7 hours ago
And not a lie was told. Great show judge!

@probasket8159
2 hours ago
Nice episode!
1

@sheilamartin1577
12 hours ago
It’s pronounced Ma- cr-on. It’s his ‘wife’ that’s Ma Crone.
18

2 replies

@kahutochishisumi9056
7 hours ago

@vern146
5 hours ago
its pronounced Macunt
2

@EWA8755
11 hours ago
Anyone still think it can’t happen here? Your country ain’t what you think it is. It’s a lot worse.
13

1 reply

@metalmamasue3680
8 hours ago
Yes it sure is. Those of us who are paying attention are VERY concerned and worried.
1

@Dot_Connectrice
3 hours ago (edited)
Thank you once again gentleman, for being a lighthouse in dark times. Your tireless effort courage and expertise is much appreciated. I guess it’s time to dust off my prayerbookGreetings from Holland

@NK-iw6rq
4 hours ago
Judge, please run for president and have these guests as your cabinet . Humanity would be saved by Christmas time.
1

@mortimersmithsr2522
11 hours ago
God bless Russia and Palestine! <3 Love from Norway
22

@schinaro
9 hours ago
I really fear that Europe has to be sacrificed for the next stage in the global reset
4

1 reply

@AnaG-pd3ym
5 hours ago
They wanted to be under US boot.

@robtherub
11 hours ago
Hey! Bernie’s peace movement again! Cool!
2

@ModernPrepping
19 minutes ago
Everyone start prepping! Get in the best shape you can physically, emotionally and spiritually.

@rcbrown22
9 hours ago
Stay strong Russia
2

@kevinstrade2752
8 hours ago
Modern times make the cold war appear tame and secure….seriously…we and the Soviets faced off, world destruction always 1/2 an hour away 24/7 but yet we had adults in charge. We hated each others ideologies and politics but we didn’t hate ourselves to annihilate each other. Today, we have literal psychopaths in charge. They have no respect for anyone, not even life itself.
3

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
3 hours ago
They would rather blow the world up than lose all their toys.

@cryptotrendsanalysis
2 hours ago
Putin said, “A world without Russia, who needs this kind of world?”
2

@tahirsultan2428
3 hours ago
How clearly Scott states his opinion with no ifs and buts. Judge, this podcast was deeply informative. Your questions and Scott’s answers were hitting the nail, right on spot.

@ralphbauer2616
12 hours ago
Scott,please read the Aachener Contracts between Germany and France.
Germany cant say no when Macron send troops and they are hurted.Than Germany must help France,is part of this Contrackt signed by Merkel.
3

1 reply

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Someone ought to lose it then..whatever next?

@someoneelse.2252
1 hour ago
Putin appears to be the only sensible person in this sick joke.
3

@abuibrahimfes5586
36 minutes ago
Scott Ritter is always on Point even in explaination , it’s compulsory those people listen, unfortunately they don’t I’m from the uk

@artyerlich3514
8 hours ago
Russia has my blessing from Australia
4

1 reply

@BozenaMable
3 hours ago
And my from Croatia

@BG1975sh
11 hours ago
Oh that is why Xi went to Paris – to see the eiffel tower for the last time
11

@Pompomgrenade
11 hours ago
They enforce then force whatever they want..
Everything has to die. It’s a zero-sum game… No loss no gain… Time spent then the end. Have a good time. The world is yours but you’re mine
2

@Jocksman100
3 hours ago
Ladies and gentlemen: Scott Ritter
1

@djxhakaza1827
5 hours ago
The Rothschild poked the wrong bear
5

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
3 hours ago
They poked the bear ten years too late.

@oldbiker9739
7 hours ago
America has reduced itself to the annoying drunk that just refuses to leave the bar! fight
4

@fredenfleur
8 hours ago
I’m love putin
the Netherlands
2

@popthis8891
9 minutes ago
Where are the REAL SOLDIERS,you are needed to look after youre own !!

@frankgarciawhite7612
12 hours ago
RitterJudgeTrumpMAGA
9

@johnnykoo6593
11 hours ago
Nucler winter is coming
10

@muhammadsaleh290
12 minutes ago
Students do lead the next page of history, no one can denied.!!

@user-yc9fw7pq2r
10 hours ago
Vova is the President of the Planet
1

@antoniotorres-alcala2355
12 hours ago
5

@87rover49
11 hours ago
Scott supports the college protesters but not the J-6 protesters
3

1 reply

@daphnethurlow5388
11 hours ago
Maybe he knows thjngs nobody else ( or few) does? Just a guess..Scott is normally very fair
4

@josefkrajcir1059
10 hours ago
….. safe travels Judge
1

@juanluistostadocanales3955
9 hours ago
That’s right Scott
1

@rolflagerquist8514
12 hours ago
Ask yourself: “Why all these continual wars? Could the lineage of Egyptian pharaoh hybrid Central Bankers be directed? Are there overlords directing Humanity’s on multiple levels? Are you afraid to face iT (inconvenient Truth)?
8

3 replies

@Jo-sp5cp
12 hours ago
Yes, those families still pulling the strings.
3

@Jo-sp5cp
11 hours ago
​ @marcosvidal4940 the propaganda is strong with you.

@PeterLamin-pi6rv
3 hours ago
Lizard people.

@Farrukhsiyar159
11 hours ago (edited)
All eyes on Rafah
5

@cherylriegel6128
8 hours ago
They did more about the people demanding at the college then the border
2

@taisadiercks696
2 hours ago
Just incredible..

@jimmybraun4193
11 hours ago
Russia’s Foreign Ministry perceives the F-16 fighters operating in Ukraine as carriers of nuclear weapons. Moscow clarified that for many years these aircraft formed the basis of the aircraft fleet used in the so-called joint NATO nuclear missions.
Regardless of the specific modification these aircraft will be delivered in, we will perceive them as carriers of nuclear weapons and consider this move by the United States and NATO as a purposeful provocation,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry added.
7

@user-xk2ue9zm4q
12 hours ago
Assumption is the mother of all fck ups
8

@steve1302000
8 hours ago
So thankful I have the peace that passes all understanding. I win either way

@DrNauseous
12 hours ago (edited)
TG channel artielebedevv published a video today of russian soldier discovering it was FRENCH troops (or mercs?) (now dead) participated in a battle.
SO, EXACTLY AS WARNED THEY WOULD DO TO
just gon a wait and see what ppl who track the frontline events and locations will say.
*btw… flag is clearly visible on the dead soldier/merc.*
6

1 reply

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago

@thugmessiah
11 hours ago
I think the judge was asking Scott, if a f-16 with a nuke on it was shot down, would that set off the nuke on the f-16. Would it???
3

2 replies

@invictuscenturion8468
11 hours ago
As far as i am aware,
No but i do not want to test that theory.
1

@villavan
11 hours ago
Yes not that Nuke carried by F-16. But SARMATS…
1

@neviocapodagli4742
2 hours ago
Amazing

@GabeT-eo3pm
6 hours ago
Italy calls for a truce in Ukraine and peace talks with Putin – Reuters
“ The West mistakenly believed that its sanctions could stop Russian aggression, but it overestimated its economic influence in the world ,” the agency quotes the Italian Defense Minister.
According to Guido Crosetto, the only way to resolve this crisis is to first achieve a truce and then peace.
2

@EarthColonyNet
12 hours ago (edited)
Mr. Scott Ritter, @4:15. given the outrageous behavior of Congress over the last few years, do you think that many people feel demoralized and powerless.
7

@aquilarossa5191
4 hours ago (edited)
Scott is getting carried away talking about Russia nuking France in the scenarios he outlined. That is not Russia’s nuclear policy. Russia’s laws on nuclear weapons use are published and are not difficult to understand. There are two criteria: If Russia is attacked with WMDs it is legal for Russia to use nukes. If an existential conventional threat to Russia exists, it is also legal (or if a conventional attack impedes Russia’s nuclear deterrence, e.g., hitting command posts). Using nukes because F-16s show up in UKR does not meet that legal criteria. A few hundred French troops in UKR does not either, even if they engage on the front lines (Russia would attack them with conventional arms).
A scenario that could meet the criteria for nuclear weapons is a large NATO force with armour threatening to overrun Russian lines in Donbas or breakthrough to Crimea etc. That’s because Russian law views
Donbas and Crimea as parts of Russia. An existential threat to those regions would exist if a large NATO force attacked them. By large, I mean an army corps or more, not companies or battalions (It might take a 50-100K NATO force to overwhelm Russian troops in a sector).
However, NATO almost certainly will not send large units of troops to the front when NATO does not have air supremacy over that front. Russia controls the skies over that front. The US method is to conduct an air campaign to degrade air defences and win control of the skies. Only when that task is complete do they send in the tanks and the grunts, etc. They will however send smaller numbers of troops to assist UKR’s military. They already have. The more they send and the more they operate toward the front lines, the more who risk returning home on ice.
That said, it is still very troubling that we are now just one or two moves from nuclear war. I lived through 21 years of Cold War. I do not remember a situation that was this close to direct conflict between nuclear superpowers (Russia has about 6000 nukes and the means to deliver them on target, so is a superpower in nuclear terms at least).
P.S. F-16s are nuclear capable launch platforms. Russia’s nuclear stance is ‘launch on warning’. That means launching its nukes if it detects nukes heading its way, i.e., they will not wait for a mushroom cloud. The trouble with F-16s launching ground attack munitions is Russia must ask itself every time if those munitions are nuclear or not. Russia has pointed this out to the West and that F-16s operating this way makes for a much more dangerous situation. Russia has effectively spoken about having to consider ‘counter force’ strikes. That means if a nuclear attack on Russia appears to be imminent, Russia could nuke that threat before it even launches. Currently that is not Russia’s nuclear weapons policy, but that can change very quickly.
3

2 replies

@aquilarossa5191
4 hours ago
BTW. The roots of this conflict go way back, but the seeds were mostly sown in 1991. The USSR broke up. Russia was in a mess and on the verge of civil war. It was unable to contest declarations of independence. The West rushed to recognize the newly declared nation of UKR, which has been declared with the borders of the Ukrainian SSR of the USSR. The trouble with that was it included cities that had been Russian for centuries, plus at least 10 million Russians found themselves on the wrong side of a new international border. UKR had a very strong Russophiie contingent. It meant so called -pro-Russia parties tended to win elections. The USA resorted to ousting those parties from power by using rebellion instead of the ballot box. What are called colour revolutions. The 2014 one was quite violent and can be called a coup.
A civil war resulted. Russia tried to have the rights of those millions of Russians in UKR protected with the 2015 Minsk II peace agreement. UKR signed it too, but it then chose war. UKR signed decrees on using force to retake rebel regions, i.e., it rejected Minsk II. UKR began mustering troops at the front and moving heavy weapons back within the exclusion zone. Russia had to chose to leave those millions of Russians to their fate, or use force. It chose the latter.
The whole thing could have been avoided if UKR nationalists were sensible enough to not claim obviously Russian regions when it declared independence and if the West had not rushed to recognize those borders (Russia recognized them too, but it had no choice — Russia was prepared to live with that until the troubles in UKR became so bad that it could no longer ignore them).

@mydancinglife730
2 hours ago
@aquilarossa5191 The Russians tried to negotiate for a neutral Ukraine beginning in the early 1990’s, shortly after the break up of the USSR, but were rebuffed every time. The SMO was launched to preempt a massive attack by Ukraine just days before it was to begin. The Ukrainian plan was to ethnically cleanse the Donbas.

@CharDaLuX
3 hours ago
I notice that the grandfather clock behind Mr. Ritter is stopped at two minutes to midnight. I am afraid that most people I know are oblivious to the frightening reality of this phase of human history. I can only reconcile this to myself as a global mass hysteria/delusion and that not every one was meant to survive for us to evolve as a species. I can’t turn my mind off, and find it difficult to sleep at night. Thank you both.

@TheBigkal201
7 hours ago
thanks judge

@Mk-rr2zj
11 hours ago
This is scary judge ! Omg !
4

@Jeremiah20vs9
12 hours ago
King JESUS is Coming
13

5 replies

@michaelashley2855
11 hours ago
And boy is he pissed

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
Where to?
1

@Jeremiah20vs9
10 hours ago
@aidanmacdougall9250 Earth

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
@Jeremiah20vs9 any specific locality, last time it was just Israel. He might be wasting his time if he picks the same destination!
1

@Jeremiah20vs9
10 hours ago
@aidanmacdougall9250 why does location concern you so much? are you ready?

@JohnDoe-wy5kh
36 minutes ago
If something doesn’t change soon we are screwed

@HarryFenton6124
58 minutes ago
I moved to France from the UK to get some peace and quiet. Dammit.

@Mccurterk
11 hours ago
You guys are right on a lot of things, but you are not right about the college campus occupations. It’s not freedom of speech to threaten and keep other students who rightfully deserve their education they’re paying for. Just like blocking roads is not an acceptable form of protest. Once your protest hinder others rights, it’s no longer protected.
5

@flashgordon6670
12 hours ago
You gotta respect the Ruskies in their own front garden. At least Dr.Trump knows that much.
No good being a sore loser, bc of Syria, by opening a front in Russia’s garden. That just says that you want to invade, or threaten to invade Russia.
If you’re going to fight Russia, you should at least pick somewhere that’s more favourable for yourself.
Saying, “But that just shows how powerful the USA is”, is complete nonsense. It just shows how powerfully in debt you are and getting more so.
Russia isn’t Iraq or Afghanistan, it’s RUSSIA.
They have ancient culture, are very intelligent and very very powerful in their own garden.
They defeated Napoleon and Hitler’s land armies.
They threatened the Japanese navy, sailing around the whole world to do so. Ok they lost that fight. But to even attempt it, shows their courage, determination and ingenuity. They put the first human in space and the first orbiting satellite.
THIS IS RUSSIA! WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING?
You’re jeopardising NATO and frittering lives away, for literally no benefit whatsoever, other than to get one up on Russia, bc of Syria. That’s not smart, it’s incredibly stupid and cold blooded, towards the innocent lives destroyed.
I used to be against Ritter, Macgregor and co. But the more I think about it, after time going by. The more I’m coming to my senses and realising, they’ve got a dam good point.
It might take longer than they say and they might not make their case, as well as could be, but their underlying message is the right one.
War is pointless, futile, unnecessary and insane. It’s a fight that we don’t need to have, so why are we doing it?
If a fight is on the cards, there’s much better ways, to go about it than this. Or try other methods, of containing any threats and challenges that are posed to the west.
Russia and it’s allies leaders might even be acting like their worried, but really their laughing. Russia hasn’t sent its best military into Ukraine, this is its B team, or C team even. They wouldn’t be that foolish, in case a major war broke out directly with another major player.
So this is all basically a great charade and a way of saving face, for Russia’s victory over the USA in Syria.
I hope I’ve sufficiently laboured the point?
Vote Trump = vote peace.
36

5 replies

@chadwolf5596
12 hours ago
3

@letsgetreal-df7pu
11 hours ago
Well I think Ritter and Macgregor consistently make there case rather clearly, as for Trump on Foreign policy same shit different bucket you’ll see soon enough.
6

@nicassiuscordero7173
8 hours ago
Uniparty congress will not allow that
War is good business for the Hill
1

@kahutochishisumi9056
7 hours ago
​ @letsgetreal-df7pu I believe you’re right

@AnaG-pd3ym
5 hours ago
I like what you said but not Trump,he isn’t the one who brings PEACE.It is enough these two party for so many years,must go.
1

@PaulMitchell-uj1uu
5 hours ago
Bernie Saunders is right on this issue.

@HaG92
10 hours ago
I’m in heaven. All the experts coming on in a single day.
19

@Jan-OlofJohansson-le7hq
12 hours ago
I think sanders is there to F things up again. To suck up the rage and do nuthing. A fake as always. Call me a cynic, and let’s see.
11

@IIVVBlues
11 hours ago
Protests are fine until they impinge on the rights of other Americans. There is no constitutional right to disrupt public or private activities or to take over private or public facilities and destroy property in the name of protest. There is a difference between vandalism and protest.
12

1 reply

@shiznit1999
8 hours ago
Every protest can be cited as impinging on the rights of other Americans.
2

@Sarah33Kaufman
8 hours ago
Wow!
1

@IllegalAlien-ep2ty
9 hours ago
They must have got the US Congressmen from the Trash.
1

@DiplomacyGone444
12 hours ago
(Sigh)….. That was definitely sobering.
3

@vvvc8528
10 hours ago
now we are all closed in the room with insane players with a box of grenades.
2

@kenlightbody6205
11 hours ago
The US have never negotiated with Russia during the DEMs in office…THis more than likely US would not be supporting this with another Admin in charge
1

@ipocritii9215
3 hours ago
Romania

@user-xh8fy1ip6k
11 hours ago
Thanku. Judge. And. Scott
4

@beto-ln5ng
9 hours ago
$2.00
Thanks!

@cesarcalderonvalles
10 hours ago
Thanks

@davidkehn6960
11 hours ago
Thanks!
2

@at5545
4 hours ago
I remember this one time when the government told the people to shut down their businesses and fire the noncompliant while also saying destructive protests were ok.

@jaygreenakajackstax9345
2 hours ago
I live in Switzerland, and this vid is making me uneasy….

@Pompomgrenade
11 hours ago
the mafia would not put something incriminating in writing… I’m not sure they’re in it for the Bill of Rights.
But then force law for their rights… I admire their honesty
2

@sokaiya1
6 hours ago
Yep. We’re living in Weimar Germany again. Same people causing the same problems.
1

@MrKaypet
7 hours ago
Brigitte L Jones. Putin has made clear his responses to NATO involvement. Scott understands and makes it very clear the risks and potential consequences as a Westerner in very understandable language. Wish he had ways of making this more widely known so ordinary people from the West could understand and express their alarm.

@mikemarkowski4547
6 hours ago
superb

@Think.com21
11 hours ago
As Joe Pesci said in the Irish man movie , ” tell him this is it, it is what it is” Unfortunately Jimmy Hoffa thought they were bluffing and he was untouchable.
2

@Yusufmasron
9 hours ago
thats the best french accent Scott
2

@SpetsnazBear-3710
9 hours ago
Excellent interview, as always w/ Mr Ritter.
Yes, indeed, these are chilling times.
As for Americans fighting in Ukienaziland, the number the Russian MoD has stated is “400+”. The US is third on the list in supplying mercenaries. It is the number that I see most commonly and that does NOT include US personal ‘sheep dipped’ and OPERATING US Patriot ADS in Ukraine. Yes, there might have a couple of batteries operated by Ukies, but the vast majority have been operated by US personnel. The US not the only country playing this game w/ their ADSs being operated in Ukraine.
As for the genocidal subject that is Gaza, all I an say is “wow”.
“Rome on the Potomac” certainly is burning.

@goldenoriolesilverbirch8220
5 hours ago
The final demise of Humankind will not be caused, not by greed or stupidity, but by HUBRIS.

@jessicamacfarlane2761
7 hours ago
The babies, donkeys, horses and mules are the true innocents of this horrible war.

@haypapa
10 hours ago
scott and magregor 2025
2

@michellefranklin3182
7 hours ago
Love Antony Sutton.

@buraczanychlew
11 hours ago
Eight O’Clock in the Morning.
1

@greencrunchy6640
4 hours ago
This shit is going to spiral out of control.
1

@danieleppelsheimer9273
4 hours ago
Judge please have a safe trip to Italy .
Your audience will miss your show during your trip.

@ralphsimpson4593
22 minutes ago (edited)
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.”—Harry Truman

@elenanikitina5206
17 minutes ago
The President of the Russian Federation, Mr. Putin, who announced the start of the military operation in Ukraine on February 24, 2022, made a statement addressed to those who would like to intervene in the situation – “Now a few very important words to those who may be tempted to intervene in the current events. Anyone who tries to interfere with us, let alone create a threat to our country and people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and will lead you to consequences you have never faced before in your history. We’re prepared for any developments. All necessary decisions have been made. I hope I can be heard”. (с)

@mohmoudfarah1897
3 hours ago
May cooler heads prevail.

@khaleedyushau4460
5 hours ago
Khalid from Lagos Nigeria Z

@bettysteve322716
6 hours ago
ICYMI the French Foreign Legion is already IN THE FIELD

@HeliStephan
2 hours ago (edited)
If a French nuclear weapon would enter Russian airspace I assume Russia would not treat this as a French nuclear weapon but instead as a NATO nuclear weapon. This can result in an all-out nuclear strike against NATO, including US.
1

@postapocalypticwarlord
59 minutes ago
Only cowards think bluff works, and bluff works only on cowards.

@tomcondon6169
10 hours ago
I don’t know, Scott may have better information. I saw a video some time ago that went into the process of becoming part of the French Foreign Legion. It was said that a new identity, a French identity, is made for soldiers, and they can stay in France after. The impression that I was left with was that there are many foreign men who join.
1

@michelhamel5435
9 hours ago
As for the French army, 450 soldiers came back to France in pine boxes last week…

@amywalton4201
7 hours ago
Let’s go Putin….they won’t listen, never did.
2

@thewefactor1
8 hours ago
Actually, what needs to be limited in government is the belief/faith that is behind these wars and almost all of the fighting since time immemorial. However, peace firstly…
1

1 reply

@thewefactor1
8 hours ago
Irrational belief/faith is

@user-kh9qr9ys7c
6 hours ago
Макрон уже заткнулся, получив с разворота пяткой в челюсть от Си Дзинпиня!!!
1

@LonelyRanger902
9 hours ago
Currently, the foreign Legion is made up of about 60% Ukrainian. So they couldn’t be just switching uniforms.
1

@padredemishijos12
1 hour ago
That letter from the Senate is a AIPAC solicitation for money letter.

@iseeulysses
4 hours ago
I can’t even mention what’s happening in the world to friends and family. I’m not sure if they’re too scared to “go there” or if they think it’s all political theatre to make citizens scared – and nothing more than bluff and bluster.

@Asgardsteve1
6 hours ago
There’s 150 Artillery Recce troops from the 3rd Regiment FFL in Ukraine at the moment the rest havent arrived yet. Macron has stated that he does not class them as French citizens therefore he does not class them as part of the French military.

@nicosnewman6402
11 hours ago
2

@Argarthie1320
3 hours ago
ritter says US senators don’t have the right to warn anybody or anyone. Yet, ritter gives warnings on a regular basis to peoples, groups and counties. Were keeping a very close eye you ritter and what you defend, endorse and say.

@hamytemkit
7 hours ago
If it were not for Russia we would be all speaking German now. France got liberated only by the grace of the allies in ww2 and now they wanna play tough. Russian front was the game changer in ww2, more than 18 million Russian souls died in ww2, what a way to say thank you to the big bear. Tell us how many GIs have you lost in ww2 in comparison.
2

@joshuahunt5924
9 hours ago
I care scott
2

@goranbpecotic
4 hours ago
Forzza Judge

@adhamsafi6185
3 hours ago

@aussiegypsy6273
9 hours ago
It was reported yesterday that 100 French troops were fired upon.

@dereckguilfoyle1219
2 hours ago
Weird I can agree with Sanders

@sajjbrown2357
11 hours ago
Scott I’m as frustrated as you are. No one wants to hear it!!!
2

@belisioglipet4655
10 hours ago
No French nationals in the legion, only foreigners.
1

3 replies

@panzerknackerpaul2061
10 hours ago
Wrong.
2

@idubzh243
3 hours ago
no true, it’s fifty fifty.

@mydancinglife730
3 hours ago
Foreigners can join and become French citizens through service. The French can join if they want to and many do. I have a French friend who served in Africa. It’s a mix.

@GazSable4wheeldrive
6 hours ago
Even if they were “anti-semetic” that should still be protected speech.

@WilliamMallinson
9 hours ago
It’s rather ironic that it was Kissinger who first advocated the use of tactical nuclear weapons in 1957 in his book ‘Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy’.

@martinmdl6879
9 hours ago
Freedom of Speech depends upon “WHERE IS THE PUBLIC SQUARE?”

@guycossettecossette7444
11 hours ago
If Russia have kind of Zeus Rods , Macron will not have the time to launch almost anything .. USA hav the system since 80s
1

@chucklander5475
26 minutes ago
I would not want to be living in Europe now.

@notayoutuber09
7 hours ago
This is truly terrible and heartbreaking. This really has to be a simulation

@user-jp5uw2ws5s
11 hours ago
Ritter is sweating it coz he knows the legion is the thin end of the wedge of more boots on the ground.
2

@kennethpaultargett5483
6 hours ago
It’s not the time to have a pissing competition between Nations…..

@volkiruski1221
7 hours ago (edited)
Scott Ritter and Col. MacDouglas are the 2 best analist there are….and there are more; Sachs, Johnson, McGovern, Tony Schafer, etc. etc. Listen to them and take them serious.

1 reply

@butmunchass
6 hours ago
Scott said Russia was winning for the last 2 years the whole time.
2

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
3 hours ago
And they have been. The Russian withdrawal from around Kiev was a gesture when it looked like Ukraine was going to sign a peace deal. Their withdrawal from around Kharkov was tactical in protection of their troops. The Ukrainians now have almost no men to fight and most of the weapons in all of western Europe have been destroyed. NATO has disarmed itself.

@grahammcandrew5614
9 hours ago
“LEST WE FORGET”

@silverxxmountain487
2 hours ago
Douglas Macgregor & Scott Ritter; Do I need to say more?……………………..

@sal-fo5ow
9 hours ago
Push the bear… push the bear…. He’s been saying it…
Bluffing…, their that stupid they’ll play the bluff…
THEN CRY WOLF…. LIKE ISREALREICH….
1

@flesz_
1 hour ago
Damnit , I’m going to Poland end of the month

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
Timing is everything. I went to Europe in 2018 and 2019, because I thought this nonsense would start in 2020…

@jone8626
6 hours ago
Bernie Sanders FINALLY Making sense.

@stevedavis1316
4 hours ago
Here you go Scott: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
What does “Peaceably to Assemble” mean?

@chriswong9158
6 hours ago
6:00 It does need to have the F35, just the F16 deliver to the Ukraine combat field, Russia will use their Unclear Missiles.
1

@Maria-ig1bd
2 hours ago
The Supreme Court decides that a bakery must bake a gay cake because they are a public service but now the students have no right of assembly or free speech because they are in campus?
No no no no, The moment the uni gets a dollar of federal funding and these students are paying tuition, that’s their ground. Stand proud, stand strong. You’re the hope for the future. Kudos. God bless.

@dalequale9365
8 hours ago
OMG!! If Scott Ritter is terrified then I’m ing myself. I’m calling Dina Titus NV CD 1 tomorrow.

@maxiakouchev8175
11 hours ago (edited)
Just before the military intervention, Putin went to Xi to talk. Putin is going to meet Xi this month. It’s time to start writing to my local MP as something fundamental happens after those talks.
1

@frankraschke4515
5 hours ago
question to Scott: Russia wins in Ukraine, but the collective West is still not willing or able to enter into any negotiations. is it possible for Russia to enter into Europe to force the European to sit down and negotiate a European security infrastructure?
1

@naturalaquatreasures
5 hours ago
Such a shame we didn’t hear the Judge’s response to Scott’s question. Why did you guys edit it out?

@roijaxen5674
5 hours ago
Are “Nukes,” being promoted as a introductory game at the summer Olympics? Great opening ceremony…

@KoguryoKid
9 hours ago
I think the boom should be lowered not just if the West puts “grunts on the ground.” It should apply for the so-called “advisors” and robots, too.

@juanluistostadocanales3955
9 hours ago
Educate them
1

@lukehanley5392
4 hours ago
JC was onto something.

@neilbodoc8600
8 hours ago
This senators are tretors
1

@indrekkpringi
9 hours ago
This video was made just before Poland said it would not send polish soldiers to Ukraine and Macron said he would not send French Legionaires to Ukraine and France will remove the French legionnaires on Ukraine.

@wtf_usa5597
7 hours ago
“There is no such thing as a limited nu.clear war. Once the sh.ooting starts, it’s over because nobody wants to get hit first with their nukes still on the ground unlaunched..”
~ Col. Douglas Mac.Gregor

@mxoldtimer4braaappp858
8 hours ago
Yet the criminals want to double down to hide their crimes

@user-yk3sl4xd6x
2 hours ago
What happened..! To ……..we THE PEOPLE

@Yvcdwsm3
8 hours ago
Maintain the status quo. keep the money flow.

@wilftomkins5546
15 minutes ago
I just wish our Dodgy Dave Cameron could listen to this.

@jimmybraun4193
9 hours ago (edited)
Blinken at the Cyber security conference in San Francisco.: “The United States wants to promote its norms and standards worldwide from a position of strength,” ( US rules based order…..by all means ).

@deguldenmiddenweg895
1 hour ago
There will be no other French soldiers then Foreign Legion soldiers in UA.

@theonlinedancer8308
10 hours ago
Did the Judge not answer Scott’s “legal question “?

@jimmychoi5219
8 hours ago
I can’t find this chapter of US Freedom of Speech or this so-called First Amendment in this new US novel called ‘Rules Based Order’
1

@Hat6000
6 hours ago
I have always considered myself a Christian, although that term covers a lot of diversity, but I don’t see the political state very craftily calling itself “Israel,” ruled by some of the most evil men on earth, as worthy of support for every evil hateful thing they do and have done. The real house of Israel is composed of those who have the spirit of and do the works of righteousness, and not those who exhibit the spirit of anti-Christ. I suppose there may very well be genuine humble and loving descendants of the tribe of Judah among those living there, I hear of the protests that the press ignores from many who understand what their psychopathic leaders are doing and planning and want nothing to do with it.
2

1 reply

@JamesGonzalez-em9un
9 hours ago
Ask Bernie if his words extend to Trump supporters.
1

@volkiruski1221
7 hours ago
Judge…where is the knob of the lamp for a light?

@lg2058
9 hours ago
But I had summer plans! I wanted to go to Thailand to see beautiful transvestites.
1

@ericlassin953
9 hours ago
Crazy Ritter as usual.

@MikeCris
7 hours ago (edited)
As I understand, the US Army is training troops at Fort Irwin for “deployment to eastern Europe”…SMH.

@taisadiercks696
3 hours ago
Living in France..macron is diluted..getting scared..now

@taisadiercks696
3 hours ago
Living in France..macron is diluted..getting scared..now

@mikehopkins6937
35 minutes ago
Bernie. Is rite

@jumbeaux1
5 hours ago
Why? Because they remember what they did at Arab Spring. They fear it’ll happen at the universities.

@LeeWalton-jk1iq
7 hours ago
MAY 15,

@bentodica4325
6 hours ago
A very important question from Judge, Scott did not answer: What will happen if a nuclear explosion happens in the air?

@111CREWGO69ZEHZ
10 hours ago
A man dribbling a ball is amazing

@Vit_Kon
2 hours ago
Я почти уверен, что западные СМИ преподнесут учения как то, что Путин безумен и угрожает ядерным оружием, хотя для большинства понятно, что Путин предупреждает не делать тупых шагов и это касается не только войск НАТО на Украине . Например, я не вижу в западных СМИ обсуждений еще нескольких аспектов происходящего, дело в том, что Россия сейчас на самом деле побеждает на поле боя и будет только ускорятся, соответственно запад видит что проигрывает и пытается быстро что-то придумать. Так вот – не обсуждают на западе то, что они пытаются создать дополнительные точки конфликта, например в Грузии сейчас проходит очередная попытка цветной революции, где может случится то, что случилось в Украине в 2014г.. Также есть подозрения, что они хотят расконсервировать старый конфликт между Молдовой и Приднестровье, так как в Приднестровье располагается миротворческий контингент России. Причем они так уже делали в 2008, когда марионеточный президент Грузии Саакашвили, напал на российских миротворцев в Абхазии, и был конфликт спровоцировал конфликт Грузии и России, тогда все закончилось быстро за несколько дней, так как Грузия маленькая и противостоять России смогла около недели, после чего Россия вывела войска. Но сейчас, когда Украина явно проигрывает и все сыпется, они могут попробовать открыть что-то типа второго фронта – Молдовы и Приднестровья. И предупреждение Путина, что бы они перестали играть с огнем может касаться не столько войск на Украине, а что бы Молдова не напала на Приднестровье, а то может прилететь очень сильно.
2

@nataliekato741
10 hours ago
Don’t need nuclear power. As we know Yellowstone.
1

1 reply

@TodaTruth
10 hours ago
“ Putin is wining “
Reporting live

@deguldenmiddenweg895
43 minutes ago
The maffia doesn’t kill children.

@laniethosea9781
5 hours ago
Piers morgan doesn’t have the guts to interview Ritter

@gragor11
3 hours ago
12:35 Not regular French soldiers. Of course they are. They’re just the non-union side of the business. They’re French soldiers

@paulhunt121
5 hours ago
“Biden” – resident evil!
2

@user-hf3vy3hu7i
11 hours ago
Please re-listen/read Macron’s recent speeches. His comments about French deployments in Ukraine were far more nuanced. He was not talking about French troops being on the combat
line. He was talking about French ( and other foreign) troops forming a rear echelon presence and acting, in effect, as a peace keeper buffer between the crumbling/retreating Ukrainians and
advancing Russians before the entire Ukraine falls. I’m no fan of Macron, however it was a pragmatic proposal …. it would create time for negotiations before Ukraine ceases to exist as a
viable nation state. He made it clearest in his address to the Sorbonne.
2

2 replies

@abdelazizbenferjani3456
3 hours ago
Let’s keep on making Dua & Prayer, Boycotting, Donating, Protesting, and Sharing Videos. Free Palestine, from the river to the sea.

@concerned_2023
9 hours ago
Judge, didn’t you have a document on your site earlier referring to a European nuclear war and the United States would sit back and watch?

@garykendall3776
5 hours ago
The French Foreign Legion is a fully integrated into the French army. However, the French government uses them for nasty work where loss of Frenchmen by birth would cause internal political questions. [ Source – interviews with former Legionnaires.]

@mikebarbeau8569
7 hours ago
How much criminality will be enough???

@NormanGarreau
9 hours ago
America is falling apart it’s sad but I don’t see the end I wonder when the end is there what will it look like norm
1

@marioduva1411
6 hours ago
Why doesn’t Zelenskyy just resign and let those young men live? What is wrong with him? Why aren’t they listening to Putin? His demands weren’t outrageous they were pretty much just, we’re going to find out soon.
1

@bertojongman1922
10 hours ago
I just saw a video of dead bodies of Frenchmen with a French flag on their uniform.
1

@gepisar
5 hours ago
6:11 jesus… havent they learned yet. The two inviolate rules of international relations: 1. DO NOT POKE THE BEAR. 2. DO NOT BLUFF THE DRAGON.

@evancarterful
10 hours ago
What are the French investments that warrant intervention in Ukraine?
1

1 reply

@d.d.6045
4 hours ago
Bernie suddenly woke up?
1

@judevalles6148
10 hours ago
Woe onto the french army

@sal-fo5ow
9 hours ago
Send Sullivan in with the captain America shield…

@davidswink6653
5 hours ago
French Foreign Legion isnt a mercenart army….its an arm of the french army
1

1 reply

@maxmurphy7306
5 hours ago
Say what who cares
French

@ophidiaparaclete
8 hours ago
How do you reconcile free speech to anything you say can and will be used against you?

@bertholdsanchez3864
10 hours ago
The Ukraine army has been collapsing for a couple of years now so I guess they will be doing so in the coming years too.
1

1 reply

@user-uc2yn6tk5o
10 hours ago
It’s a process but I get what u r saying prolly in the next 2 years it will be over

@mikeyerian2562
3 hours ago
Ive seen a lot of video of the protesters saying they’re pro Hamas, Bernie.

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
2 hours ago
Really? Post a link or two.

@jamesboswell9324
11 hours ago
Whenever I hear Bernie Sanders, the theme tune from ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’ immediately pops into my head for some reason.
1

@helengoethals9220
3 hours ago
Surely that Senators’ letter is a fake?

@michaelsaint9181
8 hours ago
Macron = Gayy Inspector Clousau.
1

@wtf_usa5597
6 hours ago
Congress-people who have citizenship in a foreign country should not be allowed to vote on or speak about our gov’ts policies towards that country. That’s an easy conflict of interest to see. Duh..

@Anonymous1dskjoadi93
1 hour ago
Judge nap please discuss issues like the thousands of Palestinians wrongfully detained, and the organ removal from murdered civilians bodies. Baby abductions as well. The cruelty of the idf torture practices.. These are big things Israel does which require truth tellers to discuss the world needs to know about the hideous and evil practices of Israel
1

@brellosjanos1022
9 hours ago
What option did Kennedy have in Cuba in 1963 if Khrushchev hadn’t given in? And what options does Putin have if NATO intervenes directly?

1 reply

@oot007
9 hours ago
Khrushchev did not start it. It was the yuuessay.

@dashriprock8596
10 hours ago
Judge, please let your guest finish his sentence. Stop interrupting.

@julietaaboka3285
1 hour ago
Was this camera issue a warning ” shalom” to you, Judge?

@PeterWilliamson-nn9et
7 hours ago
I think that Spetz Natz. Would be in Kiev in a week if given a chance

@michaelhertwig4528
5 hours ago (edited)
When Bernie Sanders is right, he is right. I do not agree with him always, but I agree with his words here (albeit considering Scott’s argument that Bernie needs to make this a free speech issue, period)! That said, the letter of the 12 makes me worry about what would happen if Trump gets in. We need somebody other than Biden or Trump. Somebody who can put such goons in their place!

@michaelbruce2476
3 hours ago
It’s about hegemony..

@user-qm4xf4ob4t
11 hours ago
The judge never answered Scott’s question regarding the constitutionality of the congressional law on antisemitism. The feed went to Bernie sanders, then a problem with the camera ensued leading to canceling the rest of the interview.
2

@gmoney7398
5 hours ago

@45pepa
11 hours ago (edited)
USA no have experience for big war on US soil !this is big problem, if is war outside over sea ,americans do know nothing !only few Americans have opinion f, good opinion for this / all war !
1

@davidswink6653
5 hours ago
To say F16s havent arrived isnt the most important question
Have all thr maintenacr crews spare parts ..the supply and supoort network been set up for them
An F16 arriving means nothing unless all that is present

@user-jl3ny9zj2z
8 hours ago
France is gonna be Euro Sahara
1

@falxnecis
2 hours ago
In 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer its nuclear weapons to Russia and became a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in exchange for assurances from Russia to respect the Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders

1 reply

@flashgordon6670
12 hours ago
Ezekiel 38
2

@Debdeaid
3 hours ago
Mr. Ritter is so excitable compared to Mr. Johnson or Ray or Mr. Cooke. Let’s get rational. Russia will be celebrating their Victory Day parade on May 9th. I am assuming the Russian MoD has recommended to Mr. Putin to be ready to protect that parade. National Security Adivisor of Russia stated Capitol Hill will be hit also along with the other powers. I am going to hang onto the Holy Fire celebration in Jerusalem of the Resurrection of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. I saw Mr. Putin along with the Mayor of Moscow in church celebrating Easter.

@uncleshamus3451
10 hours ago
What part of America is it that you love?

@jumanjiu6559
5 hours ago
There’s no wisdom left in Edom.

@jamesberonja1539
7 hours ago
Biden how many troops are you sending to prevent defeat?

@reggieduquesnoy
3 hours ago
here goes macron…pooofff…gone with the wind!

@DavidDuVivier
1 hour ago
Roland Napolitano, Hauptstürmführer Ritter, Hoffaktor Sanders… Birds of a feather flock together

@alphaghostrabbithole5340
7 hours ago
I know. You know . I’m afraid.

@patrickribard8447
29 minutes ago
French Foreign Legion are thé élite French army

@Leny1777
7 hours ago
Judging going to Italy!? I did not thumbed down this video. Youtube is acting weird.

@giganoob1968
5 hours ago
American will care when they walk outside and see a mushroom cloud, then they will think “This is bad”.

@AbdullahKhan-mo5nx
5 hours ago
The R’s’ians would happily retain the history that the US is the Only country in the world that used ‘ukes and committed ‘enocide !
1

@frankblangeard8865
9 hours ago
Tactical nuclear weapons have a range of 300 to 400 miles. They won’t reach Romania, Poland or certainly France.

@andrewkrolikiewicz6522
10 hours ago
I wonder how many of our ICBMs actually work. They sit in silos for 40 to 50 years with little maintenance. Our military considered upgrade – estimated cost came around $ 1 trillion.
So, they have done nothing. British tested their Tridents. Two out of two fizzled out. Then, testing has been stopped. They prefer not to know, I guess.
On the other hand, Russians spent untold treasure during 2000 – 2020 on updating their nuclear forces. I assume that they are ready for us if we try.
God save us from the stupidity of our politicos.

@tonygriffith2164
8 hours ago
Sending Mr. Trump to Paris and then Moscow for meetings may be the only way to save the planet. He’ll also use the opportunity to make America billions of dollars.
2

@elangovan1592
8 hours ago
If only people ate more rice there would be no wars

@NineInchTyrone
10 hours ago
We are in good hands with President Potato Head
1

@Rick8191-tv8pg
10 hours ago
over 400,000 American js where in Israel when this started ,

@deborahdillmore7347
5 hours ago
Would contractors actually go to places knowing they will be wiped out? That is not a good business model.

@suntzuhli
3 hours ago
Finally, is it Ritters real hair?

@gigante87
5 hours ago
When does free speech crossover into hate speech? And how do you distinguish between individual freedom versus society freedom or versus the freedom of another individual when they are in conflict ie the freedom to smoke and the freedom to not have to inhale somebody elses smoke?

@jessicamacfarlane2761
7 hours ago
For once I agree with Mr Sanders, great comments about mistakes of Mr Netanyahu. He has put me off reading the Bible, especially the Old Testament. I hope the Great Spirit brings him to justice. To me he is evil.

@heldtkochlyse6521
2 hours ago
french forign legion have russian nationality also

@martinmdl6879
9 hours ago
Criticise the Israeli Govt and get your camera shut off.
2

@richardcarrillo6164
8 hours ago
Okie dokie vaults to the vault

@HughJass448
17 minutes ago
The Aardvark Sanders.

@craigelectric5241
9 hours ago
I DIDN’T NO YOU WERE FRENCH

@pauldenham2952
11 hours ago
Minutes to midnight
1

1 reply

@Noname-gh5ec
3 hours ago
The German Gutmensch is lost: he wants to be against genocide but give Israel a free pass to commit genocide. So far he settles for police brutality against pro Palestinian protesters and silencing any criticism or discussion.
1

@hp323
9 hours ago
Fool Bidin nor Blinkin are calling except Xi. He went to France and then Ukraine pull out the Yank tank.

@enriquillobribiesca5602
3 hours ago
Why would Russia have to use tactical nuclear weapons when it could probably achieve its deterrence against NATO using conventional weapons? Naturally, should a humiliated NATO turn to initiating the use of tactical nuclear weapons, Russia would have to respond by doing the same.

@blustar1856
51 minutes ago
Looks like PCR has been right all along. The Kremlin’s failure to end the war quickly and overwhelmingly has led us to where we are now.

@jgarbo3541
3 hours ago
Scott, do you mean the Mona Lisa might a need a nuke-proof room at the Louvre?

@taragacie
11 hours ago
If a nuclear equipped plane is shot down, does that set off the carried nuclear device?
2

5 replies

@Just_username_3161
11 hours ago
No.
4

@user-vd2ry5ou8v
10 hours ago
Perhaps not, but then the Sarmatian will fly to the goal

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
No, could cause some locaised radiation possibly
1

@MicheleDiBiase-wd4sh
10 hours ago
Their are incidents when nuclear bombs have been accidentally dropped or fell due to the plane having a structural problem and they have not detonated, I believe their is still a atomic bomb of the coast of Spain that has never been found
2

@Just_username_3161
10 hours ago
@MicheleDiBiase-wd4sh it is deleting messages

@moneymaker2024
8 hours ago (edited)
7:18,9:36

@MarcoPolo-lb8up
8 hours ago
the man in charge has nothing to loose, he’s famously a bad character, and he has an army of lunatics at hand….go figure where this goes.

@naughtiusmaximus830
11 hours ago
What does the US nuclear arsenal have? The 50 year old untested W-78?

@craigelectric5241
8 hours ago
I don no …
I kinda like the black screen thing

@milojames5593
8 hours ago
I don’t think it’s out of the question that Russia would use nuclear weapons. But I think it is very doubtful that they would for example use nuclear weapons on Paris just because France sent troops to Ukraine. Not making a prediction that it won’t happen, but I just don’t see that being a necessary step for Russia to deal with French troops. I don’t believe that President Putin expressly stated in unambiguous terms that he would use nuclear weapons if NATO troops were used in this war. He reminded the west of exactly what they were capable of and maybe that’s enough… Maybe reading through the lines is the same thing. But I do not believe that his statement was so unequivocal that if he did not use nukes it would be considered a bluff called. Any event, I don’t think the Western troops are any match at all for the Russian military. I just don’t think nuclear weapons would be seen as a necessary tactical decision for Russia. On the other hand, I think the western leaders are so bloody insane and godless that they would be the ones to consider using them first once they saw their troops losing on the battlefield.

@servantofgod5642
2 hours ago

@20:40. Judge is showing his support for
BLANK SCREENS MATTER

@pasofino9583
5 hours ago
“ thank you for you’re service”
What a joke

@zikfocus
1 hour ago
FREE SPEECH
FREEDM OF ASSEMBLY
FREEDOM OF CHOICE DON’T GO
DON’T LISTEN IF YOU DON’T LIKE OR AGREE

@nenadrancic6675
1 hour ago
The Russians found the bodies of 7 French legionnaires in the Battle of Chaso Yar

@debo750
8 hours ago
Nato aint gonna do shit. How long with their weapon last?

@robzilla730
1 hour ago
Israel isn’t the 51st state. It’s the U.S capital…

@Ghandi12
5 hours ago
Israeli envoy says US must ‘completely stop funding’ UN if Palestinian statehood endorsed
Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan has denounced a UN General Assembly draft resolution that would recognise Palestine as qualified to become a full UN member, saying it goes against the organisation’s founding Charter.
“If it is approved, I expect the United States to completely stop funding the UN and its institutions, in accordance with American law,” Erdan said.
US law stipulates that Washington can’t fund any UN body if it grants full membership to any group that lacks “internationally recognised attributes” of statehood.
The resolution, which UN General Assembly members could vote on this Friday, will serve as a global survey on support for the Palestinian bid.
If passed, the resolution would recommend that the UN Security Council “reconsider the matter favourably”, after the US vetoed the Palestinian application for full membership last month.
Any application to become a full member requires approval from all 15 UNSC members and then the General Assembly.

@MB-oc1nw
7 hours ago
Nothing will happen………………………………..

@sirtruth3931
10 hours ago
The British aristocrats said if they lose Ukraine, the Empire will begin losing power, influence and money year by year until they become a middle of the pack nation with no resources. Slow death. So for Britain , this is an essential threat as well.

2 replies

@user-uc2yn6tk5o
10 hours ago
And Johnson was the one who sabotaged a reasonable peace deal lol

@agnieszkaolszewska6079
10 hours ago
Where did they say that?
1

@alexanderslawncare
7 hours ago
What’s going on in Africa
1

@Joaocruz30
9 hours ago
I heard in our national news that Portugal sent 12 F16 to Romania. Can any citizen of Romania confirm if they have seen planes with the Portuguese flag at your bases? If so I’m ashamed and embarrassed to be Portuguese because those F16 are going to Ukrainian bases! Jesus Christ!
1

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
3 hours ago
They will get destroyed shortly after entering Ukrainian airspace, either in Ukraine or after they flee back to Romania. Yes, it is very sad and distressing. Consider organizing a protest to negate the deal and have them returned to Portugal.

@snoozinglion8596
7 hours ago (edited)
Hey Bernie Sanders does that also stand for J6 protestors?

@johnmatthews8810
5 hours ago (edited)
Scott avoided the important question, namely if Ukraine loads a nuclear weapon onto an F35 and that plane gets shot down by the Russians, will that cause a nuclear explosion?

2 replies

@idubzh243
3 hours ago
Nope : a nuclear weapon must be ignited first to create a chain reaction that will deliver the atomic blast. Several bombs were lost (in Spain) and never exploded. The only thing you’ll get is hazards.
1

@johnmatthews8810
3 hours ago
@idubzh243 Thanks for that.

@andrewkrolikiewicz6522
10 hours ago
Stupidity and hutzpah of US senators is beyond imagination.
1

@user-kv7oj5nt2q
7 hours ago
seems like russia would use the powerful non-nukes first.

@danielfitzgerald3417
10 hours ago
Yes, but” France is NOT a NATO state, which means they can act unilaterally,not bilaterally France is not a nato member which means if they attack Russia by any sense of the word, Russia can attack them and Nato cannot retaliate, at least thats the nato rule book, but Nato has broken every word they have stated that they are supposed to abide by.

@Theone-bc7tr
5 hours ago
Love for Russia

@111CREWGO69ZEHZ
10 hours ago
It’s all about the pension. 300 million dollar dock

@nonameslb
3 hours ago
2 minutes to midnight

@yvonneollivier7088
9 hours ago
I’d never envisioned survival of civilization being put on the knife’s edge by a man who reminds me of Pepe Le Pew … I recall how arrogant, smug and self-satisfied, detached from reality that cartoon character was. Then, funny. Now, not.

@mikehopkins6937
33 minutes ago
Who the hell is going to vote for Biden

@terry7319
3 hours ago
Lets not forget Russia won w war 2.
2

@user-jx7od8js3w
8 hours ago
Scott American pepol day r stupeat i dont have school in aym smart more like American i sad 2024 is good bay avederzen world

@Horseracingtip
9 hours ago
22:28. Israel money? Aipac.

@kendahl7922
10 hours ago
Say hi to The Pope

@TakedaKenshin
7 hours ago
Your wrong Ritter about french foreign legion not being in Ukraine they are in Chasov Yar with the germans all had country of origin patches on there bodies Source (*WarNews Twenty Four Seven*)
(*

1 reply

@TimezUp23
7 hours ago
France lol
1

@giganoob1968
5 hours ago
You have to in the way, love the Russians because they are just straight with you. They are probably really bad poker players.

1 reply

@jonyoung6446
8 hours ago
I’m ignoring all of this. Die hard Patriot, but not having Joe Biden as my commander in chief!! Hands down, he will never be MY commander in chief. Same goes with any democratic party nominee…

@georgemurp7961
3 hours ago
Dasvedanya Lasagna……

@NineInchTyrone
10 hours ago
MERCENARIES

@robertcook8408
6 hours ago (edited)
Go ahead macron send your troops I dare you sorry about your luck macron’s butt hurt because Putin disrespected him when he wouldn’t shake his hand

@mysticmac5555
4 hours ago
Scott’s dead right about the Russians.

@music-art-theunknownsockpuppet
6 hours ago
I’ve always liked Scott. I only have one question though. What about the pedophile convictions? Google it. Scott, I would like to believe that you are healed from this evil sickness.

@CamC12_6_88
10 hours ago
There are thousands of American soldiers fighting in Ukraines international legion.
1

@mistwiir4011
11 hours ago
LOL – nice look, Judge

@wtf_usa5597
7 hours ago (edited)
“God’s chosen people” (in their opinion) doing their best to bring about Armageddon.
1

1 reply

@collybeans586
11 hours ago (edited)
Im not sure Ritter is correct that the foreign legion is a part of the french army and is made up of french soldiers. Can someone who knows clearify.
And to the point about Hmas and the protests and free speech, I agree completely Scott.

3 replies

@chadwolf5596
11 hours ago
Foreign non French troops fighting for France
3

@apmoy70
11 hours ago
Technically they’re French army, not French citizens (yet), they’re part of the French army selected from foreign countries. After three years of service the legionnaires may apply for French citizenship
2

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
The French can also join it, but it is mostly made up of foreigners. I have a French friend who served in Africa.

@aliounesogue6300
9 hours ago
why not just take off the government of Ukraine and bring in a government that cares about Ukraine. Zelensky does not care about Ukraine.

@naughtachance3960
6 hours ago
Don’t look up

@user-hf6qo7kq6j
9 hours ago
why dont you all tell us what happened to the tween towers first

1 reply

@Waridi23
1 hour ago
I think everyone knows the end game…the west is dying and there’s no way that empire will die peacefully. It is being led by deranged psychos just like every other empire on it’s deathbed, it’s always a deranged psycho that finally drives it over the edge, such a tragedy. It seems this is the human fate….
1

1 reply

@normankoo6159
44 minutes ago
Being anti genocide is now labeled antisemitism.

@trqster
6 hours ago
The west think that’s Putin is like the dog that always barks but never bites…oh well

@user-gn7mo8qi4v
6 hours ago
Is this REAL?

@danielpatterson9663
10 hours ago
FAFO.

@SuperBonBon2024
6 hours ago
FRANCE? Embarrassing

@larsh2923
3 hours ago
Scott is panicking, he needs to calm down.

1 reply

@marcusmurphy3640
11 hours ago
Glory to the Shovel.

@pla9012
9 hours ago
Scott feels america is not about genocide… perhaps a review of american history is in order?

@ophidiaparaclete
8 hours ago
Separate powers?
Legislative Branch Socialist BAR Association
Executive Branch Communist Jural Society
Judicial Branch Fascist Judiciary

@chriszzw30
6 hours ago
Scott thinks Russia are the only country with nukes. Truly the biggest Putin meatrider in the west.
1

@oscarmarrero3708
11 hours ago
Cornel West for president 2024.
1

3 replies

@abettertomorrow5928
10 hours ago
I hope you’re joking
1

@halifaxeh
7 hours ago
Jill Stein!

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
Why, exactly?

@affliction6665
6 hours ago
I can’t tell if this right wing or left wing propaganda.

@tonymcdow7206
11 hours ago
Worried about the camera while Scott Ritter is trying to prevent a nuclear Holocaust?

@DavidA-xp4ww
2 hours ago
I miss The Wagner Group

@tomisultra
6 hours ago
so let me see: Scott knows whats gonna happen – Armageddon, but politics just keep digging the grave to themselves and to everyone around?

@chriszelez7970
8 hours ago
Scott is all doom and gloom.
1

1 reply

@vincetagleoficiar2860
9 hours ago
Democrats united to pass support weapons to Israel
1

@Jimmy-rv5xs
9 hours ago
Once the aid starts arriving, which is just early stages now, Russian casualties can be pushed over 1500/day. Putin can only mobilize 1000/day.

@mariuschirita187
7 hours ago

from defense Romania youtube channel. title reads, “first impression of Ukraine pilots flying f-16”. so it will be no time before we start seeing burning piles of u.s.a. made aviation in Ukraine.
1

@josealvaro-bc7zv
8 hours ago
herói mundial Zelenski,com este SenhoR , a Ucrânia entra na NATO e UE Será o exército mais temido da Europa.Em poucos anos, será potência económica.Parabéns heróis Ucranianos,go Crimeia

@NatsarimPoet
10 hours ago
Without the Light , lawlessness goes forth. Saldy things will just get more confusing and divisive, more lawless now in these times. I pray more come to the knowledge of the Truth as Yahuahs mercy is still here. May Yahuah guide you out on Yahusha ha’mashiack.
MATITHYAHU AKA: MATTHEW [END TIMES EXPLAINED] 24 And going out, Yahusha went away from the Qodesh Place, and His talmidim came near to point out to Him the buildings of the Qodesh Place. 2And Yahusha said to them, “Do you not see all these? Truly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, at all, which shall not be thrown down.” 3And as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the talmidim came to Him separately, saying, “Say to us, when shall this be, and what is the signal of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” 4And Yahusha answering, said to them, “Take heed that no one leads you astray. 5For many shall come in My Name, saying, ‘I am the Mashiak,’ and they shall lead many astray. 6And you shall begin to hear of wars and reports of wars. See that you are not troubled, for these have to take place, but the end is not yet. 7For ethnicity shall rise against ethnicity, and reign against reign. And there shall be scarcities of food, and deadly diseases, and earthquakes in places. 8And all these are the beginning of birth pains. 9Then they shall deliver you up to affliction and kill you, and you shall be hated by all Guyim for My Name’s sake. 10And then many shall stumble, and they shall deliver up one another, and shall hate one another. 11And many malicious prophets shall rise up and lead many astray. 12And because of the increase in lawlessness, the love of many shall become cold. [Turah teaches love]
AMUS AMUS – AKA: AMOS 5 Hear this word which I take up against you, this Lamentation, house of Yisharal: 2The maiden of Yisharal has fallen, not to rise again. She lies forsaken on her land, with no one to lift her up. 3For thus said Aduni Yahuah, “The city that goes out by 1000 has 100 left, and that which goes out by 100 has 10 left to the house of Yisharal.” 4For thus said Yahuah to the house of Yisharal, “Seek Me and live,
1 kepha 3:18Because even Mashiak once suffered for sins, the obedient for the unobedient, to bring you to Alahim, having been put to death indeed in flesh but made alive in the Ruach, 19in which also He went and proclaimed to the Ruachs in prison, 20who were disobedient at one time when the patience of Alahim waited in the Yomim of Noak, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were delivered through water,
(It will be like the days of noah it’s written, look it up please.)
MatithYahu-matthew 4:17From that time Yahusha began to proclaim and to say, “Repent, for the reign of YAHUAH has drawn near .”
1 Timothy 2:3For this is good and acceptable before Yahuah our Deliverer, 4who desires all men to be delivered and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5For there is one Yahuah, and one Mediator between Yahuah and men, The Man Mashiak Yahusha, 6who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be witnessed in its own seasons

@MrMediterrano
11 hours ago (edited)
Being hesitant to send troops to Ukraine during the two years the war is going on, only emboldened Russia to the degree that it started threatening the West with the use of nuclear weapons if troops were to be sent to Ukraine.
Doing the same mistake again, by demonstrating hesitancy to use nuclear weapons to retaliate to a nuclear attack by Russia makes that attack likelier to happen.

@lettuceha3368
4 hours ago
100s? American mercenaries post their videos on YouTube of combat in ukrisne,,,

@odaydrums
11 hours ago
I dont know what Ritter did visa vie his pedophilia charge but that aside he does know this issue well.

3 replies

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
That’s a pathetic old slur!
1

@odaydrums
9 hours ago
@aidanmacdougall9250 i believe he was convicted.

@aidanmacdougall9250
1 hour ago
@odaydrums he’s paid the penalty, there should be forgiveness for mistakes in life. Scott has spoken about it, and not hidden away from it, but shouldn’t have to apologise forever. He’s a man of great integrity

@lowkeygato2133
5 hours ago
Scott is contracting what prigozhin said before he was assassinated. 1000 Russians dead a day is what prigozhin died for speaking about.

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
That might have been one bad day in Bahkmut. Ukraine has lost 600,000 and Russia less than 80,000 to date.

@letsplayretrogames972
8 hours ago
How were you a “judge” and you don’t even know the when where & how of 1st amendment is determined by the government or property owner

1 reply

@verilyze
8 hours ago (edited)
He ain’t a lawyer judges gave refrence manual

@dajo320
6 hours ago
Scott Ritter is wrong, his fake French accent is actually pretty decent.

@111CREWGO69ZEHZ
10 hours ago
GO NINJA GO Z 1 1 1 CREW GO69 Z

@marqbeatty2694
5 hours ago
If Scott Ritter isn’t making sense with his scary analysis and dire projections about the intolerable geopolitical danger being created by the West’s stance regarding the upcoming ‘death’ of NATO’s Ukraine project, then I’d really appreciate being persuaded to the contrary by someone who doesn’t come across as a total idiot when they tell me how and why Scott Ritter’s got all this badly wrong?!?

@markanderson9772
7 hours ago
Anarchy is not free speech.

2 replies

@77Love7
8 hours ago
The great and perfect President Putin NEVER runs out of patience. He is an incredible President. I love him so much. He’s amazing. He’s wonderful!

@scoutdog5551
10 hours ago
Doesn’t mean you can protest, out side of the law, hmmm, you would think a “judge” would know that…
1

@a.howell78
11 hours ago
Why is Bernie changing his tune. Is he now the voice of the college protests? Hmmm
2

1 reply

@w3s77
9 hours ago (edited)
I chuckled when you said Ukraine and future. Ukraine was cooked after the Obama coup in 2014.
2

1 reply

@skippyMcphat
36 minutes ago
Becoming a bit sensationalist

@hubbezoglu
10 hours ago
nato is finito…

@namur-iq6ih
11 hours ago
Zelensky has failed to achieve any of his goals and is leading his country into an abyss after losing many parts of Ukraine, its infrastructure and economy destroyed, and millions of people displaced after two years of war.
1

1 reply

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
He’s just a puppet!

@vincetagleoficiar2860
9 hours ago
democrats still supporting war against Palestinians bernie supported it
1

@walterjohnson6357
7 hours ago
For more than 800 days, this guy has said it is over and Ukraine says not so fast.
1

@yvonneollivier7088
8 hours ago
I despise Bernie, because he impresses me as being almost as genuine as a three dollar bill. And I agree (w. Scott) that free speech is THE issue.
Yet, I am making a sour face and defending Bernie’s saying that the students were protesting against genocide and for freedom for Palestinians, not for Hamas.
I do not view Hamas as a terrorist organization, rather as military resistance to occupation. But if one wants to go that route, let’s talk about Irgun and the Stern Gang, and past Israeli prime ministers.
The propaganda machine constantly accuses the students of being pro Hamas “terrorist” supporters. I think it was fair of Bernie to address that.
He could have specified the two issues for clarity.
But maybe he didn’t want clarity. Maybe he wanted to do the obligatory “condemn Hamas” routine by the back door for the propaganda machine.
2

@donaldlasek3696
10 hours ago
They need to send there natsees

@plusspus
10 hours ago
Grownups acting like children…

@marcosvidal3146
12 hours ago
Just by seeing Scott and the copious amounts of diet coke he drinks, one has to conclude that definitely diet coke makes you thin. No, wait… Another capitalist lie?
1

@MsSweetlandofliberty
3 hours ago
I think we need Trump back immediately! Will Putin wait another 7+ months?
1

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
Wait for what? This will be over by then.

@lifeisamovie4006
2 hours ago (edited)
Sleep tight people. Scott is dreaming the same frightful dream for the last 20 years. And will keep at it for the next 20.
Don’t be too judgmental. He’s just making a living.

@user-qi6tm2fb5x
10 hours ago
So right on Russia, yet so anti-Semitic.
1

@Mick-iv6mk
8 hours ago
Russian casualties at 500,000 now

@wanderingquestions7501
11 hours ago
It’s getting silly; Ritter ranting
2

1 reply

@user-db5ts2yt6o
12 hours ago
DUMB BUT HAPPY

1 reply

@NeoFreshair
11 hours ago
I disagree with Scott Ritter ….. Russia isn’t going to use nuclear if some NATO forces send soldiers to Ukraine …… Russia has the capability to target any foreign forces ……

@scaryginganinja6548
11 hours ago
Good Ol’ Scott “Unlawful contact with a Minor” Ritter. Always a pleasure.

4 replies

@aidanmacdougall9250
10 hours ago
Bit sad to keep bringing that up, it was dealt with ages ago
3

@scaryginganinja6548
10 hours ago
@aidanmacdougall9250 Bit sad to engage in unlawful contact with a minor.

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
Set up by the feds, yo! and poor judgement on his part for falling into it…

@niblet112
1 hour ago
@scaryginganinja6548 and yet certain people on a certain list to a certain island still walk free. You seem to be unconcerned about the fact the people in this list run the west

@Milleeee
11 hours ago
Traitor
1

1 reply

@mydancinglife730
1 hour ago
Who? Biden? Trump? Mike Johnson?

@carolynzaremba5469
9 hours ago
Please don’t make us listen to the charlatan Bernie Sanders.

@NoelOKeeffe-pq3pq
10 hours ago
Scott is on the Kremlin payroll
1

1 reply

@JDOG1974yes
10 hours ago
This Russia sponsored channel is out of control !

2 replies

@rodneypennington1086
10 hours ago
What r u smokin
4

@cyberspore00
9 hours ago
It’s called, “Cognitive Dissonance.”

@andrewackerley9985
11 hours ago
This program is totally fatastical. Ritter eeds to be set to a secure hmetal istition.

2 replies

@michaelashley2855
11 hours ago
Proof read
2

@wkgurr
11 hours ago
Proof read

@NoelOKeeffe-pq3pq
10 hours ago
A spoofer … why are you taking him as an expert …. A convicted sex offender has zero credibility

==========================

See Also

top

 

John Mearsheimer – Why is Ukraine the West’s Fault? – Sep 26, 2015 – Transcript

Mark Collett – NATO is to Blame for the Conflict in the Ukraine – Mar 4, 2022 – Transcript

Putin Explains the Military Situation and Why Ukraine Might Lose Its Future – Mar 7, 2022 – Transcript

Red Ice TV – How Jewish Activism Transformed the West, Who Benefits from Ukraine-Russia War? – Kevin MacDonald – Mar 27, 2022 – Transcript

John J. Mearsheimer – Who (Really) Caused the Crisis in Ukraine – Mar 2, 2022 – Transcript

Joel Davis – Mark Collett vs Greg Johnson – The Ukraine Debate – Oct 17, 2022 – Transcript

The Z Blog – A Ukraine Primer – Jan 13, 2023 – Transcript

Judge Napolitano – Putin & Xi Have Met – Now What in Ukraine? Col Doug Macgregor – Mar 22, 2023 – Transcript

Douglas Macgregor – The US Want Russia to Collapse – Feb 1, 2023 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 4735

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Tue, May 7, 2024 — Published post. Includes YouTube comments (1,355).