Freedom of Speech – katana17

Ernst Zundel – My Life and Political Awakening – 1979 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 05:47:37 +0000

Ernst Zundel

My Life and Political Awakening

1979

[German-Canadian revisionist, author, artist and activist Ernst Zundel gives a fascinating account of his life and adventures up to 1979. See table of contents for list of highlights.

– KATANA]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OXPGAKlxFCno

JohnRobinson101 – https://www.bitchute.com/channel/pcBHZPgCtR2a

Ernst Zundel Video Collection – https://odysee.com/@ErnstZundelVideos:8

Recorded in 1979

Description

Ernst Zundel – My Life and Political Awakening (1979)
490 Views – 4 years ago
Channel
JohnRobinson101
2,523 Subscribers
JohnRobinson101
Sensitivity – Normal (BBFC 12)
Created from an audio recording.

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 13,198 – Duration: 75 mins)

01 “Who Are You? Where Are You From? What is Your Background?

02 I was Born Just at the Outbreak of the Wwii

03 My Mother Saying: “Oh, That’s the Front Coming Closer.”

04 Fire Bombing of Pforzheim, Our Neighbor City with 20,000 Killed

05 the Allied Occupation with the Rapes, the Looting, and Then the Starvation

06 the French Allowed US Only 850 Calories Per Day in Ration Coupons

07 We All Looked Like Kids from Bangladesh or Biafra

08 Father Comes Home a Broken Man from an American Pow Camp

09 Zundel Graduates from Public School and Decides to Become an Artisan

10 an Aptitude Test Declares Him as Being “Universally Talented”

11 Enrolled in a Three Year Apprenticeship Training Program as a Graphic Artist at Age 14

12 Completes His Apprenticeship with Flying Colours and Moves Osnabruck in North Germany

13 Zundel is Told He Must Speak German!

14 German Magazines with Full Page Ads from the Us, Canada, Australia, Etc., Saying “Immigrants Wanted!”

15 Zundel Choses Canada Because It Looked Like Home in the Black Forest

16 Arrives in Montreal Canada in the Fall of 1958, and Then to Toronto

17 Gets His First Job in Canada as a Graphic Artist for Simpson Sears

18 Getting Settled Down in Canada, with a High Paying Job, Learning English Every Day

19 Meets a Lovely Young Girl in Night Language School, Leading to Marriage and His First Son

20 Brings over His Mother for a Visit, Travels Around North America, Recession Hits and No Job or Money

21 Moves to Montreal and Starts Job Hunting at 21, but Becomes a Freelancer

22 Starts to Learn French, and Business Succeeds, Puts a Down Payment on a Home

23 Develops an Interest in Politics and Meets Adrien Arcand, the Hitler of Canada

24 Visits Europe and Contacts Many People to Further His Political Education

25 Enrols in University in Montreal to Study Political Science and History

26 Becomes a Public Speaker to Overcome Shyness

27 Declare Himself as a Candidate for the Leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada

28 Becomes an Official Candidate, One of Seven

29 the Whole Exercise Only a Method to Gain Attention for My Cause

30 Germans Being Second Class Citizens in Canada

31 a Live Interview Which was Broadcast to Europe in German

32 Received Only $105 in Donations for His Efforts to Help the Immigrant Community

33 Must Now Return to Business Life and Tend to Mending My Fences

34 Separatism by Communists Becomes Violent in Quebec

35 Discovered Indeed That There was a Conspiracy to Shape History

36 Sells House and Goes on On World Tour Through Europe, Africa, Middle East, and the Far East

37 Suffered Culture Shock, Race Shock!

(In progress)

top

This is Ernst Christoph Friedrich Zundel. I’m the man behind Samisdat Publishers in Toronto, Canada. At the request of many of my friends, both here in Canada, especially in America, in Australia, in South America and also in Europe, I want to tell you about myself. Many of you have asked:

“Who are you? Where are you from? What is your background? What was your development?”

Many of you have been very generous. In book orders, in tape orders, in donations of money, material and support. I think I owe it to you that I reveal all there is to know and all that those who put their life virtually on the line for me and for our cause are entitled to. I was born on the 24th of April, 1939 in a small town of less than 4,000 souls in the Black Forest of Germany. My family lived in an old cottage, 350 years old at the time. It was, in fact, the oldest house in the whole valley.

Now, the Black Forest, as many of you maybe don’t know, was never conquered by the Romans. The people living within these black, dark forests were fierce warriors. And the Romans found it easier, after numerous battles and engagements which they lost, to circumnavigate, to go around the Black Forest. In effect, they built a wall around the Black Forest, fortified wall, which was called the Limes: LIMES. And you will find it written up in history books. Well, my folks lived in the Black Forest for centuries.

And research with that in my family tree has actually traced it as far back as the 14th century to Switzerland and from there to northern Italy. On my father’s side, we were lumberjacks, peasants. On my mother’s side, she comes from Bavaria, near the town, historic town of Augsburg. We were middle class people, teachers, lawyers, musicians, writers, artisans.

02 I was Born Just at the Outbreak of the Wwii

top

I was born just at the outbreak of the war. I was the fourth of a family of six children and the oldest son. My earliest childhood recollections, of course, are of the war. My father wearing his German army uniform, coming home on leave from Russia. He was with the medics, ambulance trains, in fact, picking up the wounded from the battlefields of Europe and bringing them home to Germany, to hospitals, some of them which were in the Black Forest.

And of course I remember as a lad the tremendous joy to be held in my father’s arms and to go on outings with him into the woods, however brief they were the next recollections are bombing raids of strafings by Allied fighter bombers, notably French in this case. And the real horrible nature of war came home to me as a very young boy by being yanked out of bed at 3, 4, 5 o’ clock in the morning when these massive bombing raids by American and British bomber fleets took place. And their flight path, invariably when they went to bomb Nuremberg, Dresden, Aschaffenburg, Munichen, passed over the Black Forest.

And I remember vividly the endless droning of these powerful Flying Fortresses and Liberators. And then also on the way back, Allied planes crippled by German flak, on fire, burning, wings dropping off, pilots jumping out with parachutes and so on. It was just an absolutely frightening experience for a young fellow. And those were my wartime recollections.

04 Fire Bombing of Pforzheim, Our Neighbor City with 20,000 Killed

top

And then a new dimension was added. In that I could hear the thunder of guns coming ever closer. And I remember my mother saying:

“Oh, that’s the front coming closer.”

Well, I didn’t really quite know what “the front” was, but it was something ominous because everybody was afraid, everybody was frightened. And German troops appeared, on retreat. Old soldiers, some without guns, came through.

And then there were artillery duels with Americans and French guns shelling German positions. The German positions running right through our valley. Germans once in a while firing back, artillery shells exploding all around us.

And then flight. My mother was frightened. She took us, five children at the time, to the forest and there we hid. We took our goats with us, our chickens, our rabbits. We tied them all up in dense bush and waited for the hostilities actually to pass us by. And we saw by peeking through cracks in the Woods that indeed, French army units were moving up the valley and tanks were stopping and they were looting our houses and Germans were being killed. German soldiers were lying by the roadside, German vehicles were shot up and the front passed us by. And shortly thereafter the war was over.

04 Fire Bombing of Pforzheim, Our Neighbor City with 20,000 Killed

top

However, just at the end of the war, the city of Pforzheim, our neighbor city, was bombed in a massive air raid in which over 20,000 people were killed in this once lovely medieval old city. And the firestorm created by this American bombardment was so horrendous that I remember all the trees in our valley bending towards this town and a tremendous suction taking up leaves and branches and twigs and rushing down the valley towards this town. The whole sky was illuminated, even though the town was over 20 km away.

I remember the next day my mother, who was working with the Red Cross, being called upon to go into this town to help those who could still be helped. And when she came back, she was a changed woman for all the horror she had seen and all the human torches that had shrunken bodies down to children’s size. A town which we knew so well, had been reduced to utter ruins and utter rubble!

[09:49]

05 the Allied Occupation with the Rapes, the Looting, and Then the Starvation

top

Couple that with the invasion, the end of the war, with the rapes, the looting, and then the starvation, and the needless cruelty of the occupation occupying powers to children, man and beast, in fact. My father became a prisoner of the Americans and went through some horrific experience in an Allied prisoner of war camp in Darmstadt, where for four weeks these men lived without shelter in open fields, eating earthworms, bugs, drinking practically their own urine. Just a horrible mess!

And we children, of course, couldn’t go to school because the school was occupied by Allied troops. Tanks, armored cars were parked in the schoolyards. Life seemed to almost have ceased. And then slowly the French, who occupied our area with Moroccan and Algerian troops, colonial troops, got their act together and established civil administrations under the military government. Naturally, the people who governed Germany at that time were quislings, in this case, Allied quislings. They did the bidding of the Allies.

And I remember the very first edict was, that all radios had to be delivered to a central collecting point. So that these radios were then taken as booty to France. Then gold watches were taken, then all rifles, all guns, on pain of death, were taken. Then all cameras were taken. In effect, it became a major crime to photograph or to record any of the Allied misdeeds in Germany. And everybody complied with those rules and those laws, because after all, there was just no way that they could be changed.

The German army had surrendered unconditionally. The German government was a mere shell, prevented in executing its governing functions by the Allied military authorities. In other words, the Germans were disenfranchised.

06 the French Allowed US Only 850 Calories Per Day in Ration Coupons

top

Hunger broke out. We were starving. The French allowed us 850 calories in ration coupons. The United Nations today says that man needs 2,000 calories to survive. Towards the very end of the war in German concentration camps, the inmates got 1750 calories. And here we were with 850 calories. What that means, I want to illustrate to you simply by this, that we got two pieces of bread a day. Never mind butter, meat and stuff like that.

But as a young growing fellow, to be having to live on two pieces of bread meant that we were constantly starving! Susceptible to all kinds of diseases, constantly sick, constantly cold, no shoes on our feet, no clothing, because of course the warriors had been very tough on the Germans. And here, where the so-called peace years worse. Then the French confiscated all our seed potatoes, which meant that the farmers had to deliver all our seed potatoes to the authorities. And therefore it was a foregone conclusion, since you couldn’t seed, that there was going to be starvation at the end of the summer.

07 We All Looked Like Kids from Bangladesh or Biafra

top

And sure enough, that’s exactly what happened. Children came down with massive hunger and protein deficiency caused diseases, skin sores. We all looked like kids from Bangladesh or Biafra. However, the world seemed not to care.

In the meantime, our mothers were molested by these occupying troops. Our sisters were chased all over. Some were raped. Many a black mongrel baby resulted, because these troops, after all, were colonial color troops.

And I remember coming home from school, which had started in the Evangelical church basement at the time, and seeing a tremendous fracas in the town square, in effect observing a battle between the White French officers and the French colonial troops, which in fact, later on turned to the disarming of the French colonial troops. And only the French officers were bearing arms by that time.

Life began to normalize. Hunger was a constant companion. So was fear. And of course, my father was still a prisoner. We were five at that time. My mother did the best that she could in raising us. I attended the little country school, and it was a horrible period for everybody, also for myself.

08 Father Comes Home a Broken Man from an American Pow Camp

top

But finally one day my mother said:

“Papa is coming home!”

And my father came home a broken man from the American prison of war camp. He began to pick up his old life as a lumberjack, and things seemed to go to normal. But we soon discovered that my father’s spirit was indeed broken, and he turned to alcohol for solace. That complicated, of course, our problems. A large family, little income, and now this added burden.

However, my mother was a strong personality. We had our little land, which we tilled, grew our own potatoes, grew our own vegetables, grew our own teas, herbal teas. We had some goats, from which we got milk, some chickens from which we got eggs. Berries we collected in nearby woods, mushrooms in summer, wood for the wood burning stoves. We made our own tools, just like in medieval times. And almost you could say that we lived in a cashless society.

09 Zundel Graduates from Public School and Decides to Become an Artisan

top

It was wonderful in its simplicity to be growing up at that time. In my family, we had no radio, we had no television. We had all told 10 books in our bookcase. It was almost as if I was living in a medieval environment. School taught me very thoroughly and very efficiently how to count, how to spell, how to write. I graduated from public school in the top ranks. There was not enough money to go on to high school or higher education, even though the teachers tried to get scholarships and so on. But at that time, Germany had different problems to worry about than to sponsor one of its simple sons to higher education. And therefore it was decided that I should become an artisan.

And since I had been a very good artist and always sketched and drew on every scrap of paper, my mother decided that:

“Well, this is what this boy is going to be. He’s going to be an artist.”

Well, she was soon informed that to go and to study art at some university cost just unaffordable amounts of money. As fate would have it, our old cottage was an attraction for all kinds of artists. Painters, watercolorists. And one day one of these artists, while he was sketching this picturesque scene, spoke to my mother and he was invited for a cup of ersatz coffee. And was of course, introduced to young Ernst’s drawings.

[19:15]

10 an Aptitude Test Declares Him as Being “Universally Talented”

top

And indeed, he said, maybe because he was polite, that:

“Oh yes, this boy has definite talents as an artist.”

But since to become a fine art painter was almost an impossibility, he too suggested that I should become an artisan. Well, he suggested to my mother that I should go to the local manpower or unemployment office where they could evaluate me and advise my mother for a job. Simple matter! We took the train, took the last bit of money that my mother had scrounged and went to the neighboring large town of Pforzheim, that had been devastated earlier in the war and which was now slowly digging itself out of the rubble. And there, amongst the ruins, I went to this special labor service or unemployment office testing center. And some men in white smocks, middle aged men, gave a two day test, an aptitude test. And lo and behold, here was young Zundel. They said:

“Universally talented! I could have become anything!”

Well, that somewhat perplexed my mother. She said:

“Well, but he wants to be an artist again.”

Again the advice was given to her:

“There is no money, no survival in art in modern day Germany, which is in ruins. Let him learn a trade!”

And one of these men suggested I should become a commercial artist. And there were two or three firms that were specializing in commercial art. And they were given notice and we were given their addresses and we went there. And sure enough, after seeing my drawings, one of these firms, a graphic art Institute, adopted or accepted me as an apprentice, an apprentice artist.

11 Enrolled in a Three Year Apprenticeship Training Program as a Graphic Artist at Age 14

top

And I was enrolled in a three year apprenticeship training program. 1953, that was my pay was to be a dollar a week for the first year, $1 a week for the first year. Then for the second year it was to be $1.50 a week. And for the third year it was to be $2, not a little over $2 a week, if you can believe this. You heard correctly. My duties were to do all kinds of work, to learn the Graphic Arts business from the bottom up. And during my weekly work at this firm, which comprised working on Saturdays too, 48 hours a week, I was to attend two days of graphic arts college to learn about printing processes and so on.

Well, that meant that as a boy of not quite 14, I had to get up at 5 o’ clock in the morning, walk for half an hour towards the train station, there, take the train for three quarters of an hour in order to commute to this city of Pforzheim. And the same procedure, of course, reversed itself in the evening, where I then would come home about 7 o’clock. So from 5 o’ clock in the morning till 7 o’ clock at night, I was learning and working in this trade. I enjoyed it thoroughly because here I was in my world. It was warm, it was indoors, I could sketch and I could draw. And I learned how to become an artist. And it was just wonderful!

And I passed the tests that, the occasional apprenticeship tests, intermediate tests and so on with flying colors. Graduated at my end of three years learning period with top honors! And immediately was rehired by the firm which had trained me. And they were giving me a very handsome salary for a young fellow at that time. As a matter of fact, at the age of 17, I earned twice as much as my father did, immediately.

12 Completes His Apprenticeship with Flying Colours and Moves Osnabruck in North Germany

top

Well, naturally I had been introduced to the city life. Become stimulated by all the things that were available. A larger world opened up. And my mother contributed to this by saying:

“Boy, across this hill there is a world to be conquered!”

Well, maybe I took her a little too literally, because within less than a year I applied for a job in the north of Germany and went there to further my studies. Because by no means is one a fully rounded, complete expert in one’s field after an apprenticeship. This is only rudimentary. And I was immediately accepted by my virtue of my test results and by my samples of my work that I submitted. Immediately got a very well paying job in the town of Osnabruck in the north.

13 Zundel is Told He Must Speak German!

top

Well, I bid my family farewell and took the train and onto new adventure to the north. And discovered that the dialect that I was speaking in the south, which was Swabian, was not understood by my fellow Germans in the north. And on the second day, the man in charge of this new company called me in and he said:

“Zundel, you must understand that you must speak German here, not Swabian!”

You see here I was a stranger in my own land. However, youthful vigor and spirit of adventure got the better of me. I very quickly learned to speak high German. And settled down to a new way of life. And I was able to support my family financially with the money that I earned in this firm.

14 German Magazines with Full Page Ads from the Us, Canada, Australia, Etc., Saying “Immigrants Wanted!”

top

Well, it was the time of full page advertisements in German magazines and in German newspapers by the United States, Canada, Australia and South Africa. And it said:

“Immigrants wanted!”

And in glowing colors it portrayed these lands of unlimited possibility. Well, there was my mother again ringing in my ear, saying:

“There’s a world to be conquered!”

And I found myself writing away to these addresses in these magazines for brochures and information about these various countries. The United States, Embassy in Germany replied, the South African embassy replied, the Australian embassy replied, the Argentinian embassy replied. And the Canadian embassy replied.

15 Zundel Choses Canada Because It Looked Like Home in the Black Forest

top

However, I decided that I was going to go to Canada.

The reason was really quite simple. I liked what I saw in the brochures. It looked very much like the Black Forest. There are lots of trees, lots of mountains, and it was like home.

[26:40]

Also, the seasons were the same. They were winter, summer, springtime, fall. That also appealed to me. And one of the big deciding factors, Canada had no military draft! You see, I believed in all the propaganda that we were fed after the war, that the Germans were a bunch of war criminals and murderers and an army of looters and rapists and so on and so I had an aversion bred into me by this Allied propaganda. The step from thought to action in my life never was a very long one. I decided to apply for immigrant status to Canada. Within three months. I was granted it.

In those three months, as a precaution, I just decided that I was going to learn some English. So I rode away for a correspondence course and going by the book and by listening to BBC London Foreign Service, I learned English, English. Not realizing that in Canada and the United States, English, English was just about useless. And again I found when Canada finally accepted me and I got on the boat and steamed out of Germany towards this new wonderful adventure. And when I landed in Canada, that nobody could understand my English, English.

And so I had to relearn again. And my German boss’s phrase:

“Boy, speak German!”

Rang in my ears. In this case it meant speak English, meaning Canadian English.

16 Arrives in Montreal Canada in the Fall of 1958, and Then to Toronto

top

I landed in Montreal in the fall of 1958, immediately was put on a train and shipped to Toronto, because the immigration officer in Germany at the time had determined for me that my best possibilities for work were indeed in Toronto, the English language area in Ontario. I arrived at the time in Cananda, when there was one of these ever recurrent depressions in this land.

Of course, I had no idea nobody had told me about that. And all my other German friends with different trades were unemployed. And were really suffering. So I took my sample work, went down to the local immigration office, manpower office. And with my limited amount of English, English said to them, qy my name is Ernst Zundel. I’m a commercial artist looking for work. Fine, they said:

“No problem. We will fund your job in no time.”

Well, that made me feel better. I was sent around to various people and found out that indeed I couldn’t speak any English. I couldn’t understand what these people were saying to me.

However, every day I learned 30, 40 words out of the dictionary. And within three days I was sent to a firm, a very large firm, well known to North Americans called Simpson Sears. In America is called Sears Roebuck.

17 Gets His First Job in Canada as a Graphic Artist for Simpson Sears

top

Well, I introduced myself again, had the letter from the immigration with me. Which introduced me as a new arrived immigrant needing assistance in the form of a job in my chosen field. I showed the people there my sample work. And the man in charge of this organization of a graphic arts Institute looked at my work and said:

“Impossible!”

And I didn’t know what impossible meant at the time. But I could see by the way he was wrinkling his forehead that he was skeptical. And so with hand and foot, I was trying to explain that here are my test results, Here is my diploma. These are my samples. And he said:

“Ah! Just wait a minute. I have a German lady here. She will translate for you.”

Off he went to return a minute later with a lady from Hamburg. This lady looked at my samples, asked me what my background was, where I was trained. I pointed out my apprenticeship papers, my fantastic test results. And very good references I had in Germany from these German firms. She translated it to him, and his skepticism turned into surprise. He said:

“How is it possible that a young fellow of 18 could be so advanced?”

Well, that led to a discussion of the German apprenticeship training program. The testing that they do over there. And naturally inherited talents being developed to the utmost and so on. And this fellow turned out to be a Scotsman. And he still had this undertone of skepticism. And she told me in her translation that he just couldn’t believe it! Well, that really somewhat angered me. And I said:

“Look, if he doesn’t believe me that I can do this kind of work, I’ll work for nothing! I’ll work for two, three days for nothing. I have my tools with me. And then he can see whether I can do the work or not!”

Well, that pleased, I suppose, the Scotsman in the Scotsman. And he said:

“Great! You can start tomorrow! First thing, 9 o’ clock in the morning.”

Here the immigrant arrived with his satchel on his back, his sandwiches in his pocket. And I settled down in an area that I was assigned to do some work. And for the next three days this Scotsman really put me through my paces. Well, he was astonished! And I could see he came to see me every half hour, three quarters of an hour, hour on the hour, monitoring my work, that he was increasingly surprised.

At the end of the three days he called in the German lady, called me into his office and he said:

“Young man, you are hired!”

And he said at that time, it was $93 a week!

But in the excitement I didn’t really understand that and I thought he must have made a mistake or maybe I misunderstood him in that he said “$39 a week”. Because at that time I was sharing an apartment in a rooming house with a German immigrant, a master, he had two master titles in his trade, bakery and so on. And this man was earning $41 a week. So I thought undoubtedly he must have meant $39 a week. And I had already calculated out that even with $39 a week I could save some money and I could continue to support my mother and my brothers and sisters back in the Black Forest.

Well, Friday came around, payday came around, and of course, with trembling hand I opened my pay envelope and there was a check for $93! I couldn’t believe it! I thought that I had hit paradise! $93 at that time was a fantastic amount of money! And I could live on $25 a week!

[36:10]

18 Getting Settled Down in Canada, with a High Paying Job, Learning English Every Day

top

So very quickly I began to establish a saving account and save my money frugally, sent some money home and was really settling down in this lovely land, learning English every day. I found people extremely kind towards me, all kinds of help when you are helpless as an immigrant. And I found at that time there were only Whites in Canada that I came in contact with. It was just a joy to be amongst these people! There was real brotherhood in the true sense of the word. And I was made welcome everywhere that I went, or so it seemed.

Christmas came around, I was invited by some Canadian people to their homes for Christmas. And homesickness, which was an off and on problem, began to fade.

19 Meets a Lovely Young Girl in Night Language School, Leading to Marriage and His First Son

top

Soon I got to know a lovely young girl in night school where I had gone to attend language classes. And one evening the door opens and in came a beautiful looking redhead! And I said to my German buddy who was sitting beside me:

“Boy, she’s gonna be my woman!”

Sure enough, I made sure that I would get to know her better. We became friends, acquainted, engaged, were married, established a family, and soon our first boy was born in the city of Toronto with a lovely French name, Pierre.

20 Brings over His Mother for a Visit, Travels Around North America, Recession Hits and No Job or Money

top

But adventure again, gripped me. I had saved all kinds of money. So I decided:

“Ah well, I must bring my mother to this lovely land and pay back a little milk money.”

And had bought myself a car and traveled all over the province and all over the country and short my mother, who had after all given me life and nourished me and had made sure that I could learn such a fantastic and well paying trade as commercial art to give her in return the joy of seeing a land which otherwise she couldn’t have done.

Well, the company which I had joined by that time had promised me leave of absence and that I would have a job back when I got back from my travels.

As it turns out again there was a recession and no job. I had spent all my money on traveling around North America for three months and I had about $75 in my savings account. A small baby, newly married and suddenly no job! Well, my mother had returned to Europe and here I was, $75, all this responsibility, 21 years old. I said to my French-Canadian wife, I says:

“Mon cherie, what are we gonna do?”

Well, she said:

“You always wanted to go to the province of Quebec. I’d like to go be back amongst my own people too.”

21 Moves to Montreal and Starts Job Hunting at 21, but Becomes a Freelancer

top

Well, we loaded our belongings, very few as they were at that time, on a truck and moved the 350 miles from Toronto to Montreal and I went job hunting. Well, I soon found that in the city of Montreal the commercial art studios were much smaller. That commercial art was not as well paid as it was in Toronto, because Toronto is the graphic arts center in Canada.

But I also found that many of these smaller studios could not afford a highly paid specialist like myself. However, each one of them assured me that they had repeatedly and off and on jobs that required my specialty of photo retouching and I should leave my name and phone number. Well, I couldn’t find a steady job, so I decided:

“Well, the heck with this, here’s a perfect opportunity to become a freelance artist!”

And I merrily set up shop in one of the bedrooms in the apartment, bought myself a secondhand drawing desk, a small compressor or air bottles for my airbrush. And the first telephone call was received, a man said:

“Mr. Zundel?”

Of course, in French. And I quickly had to teach myself the first few words of French.

“Oh well, I have a job for you.”

So I jumped on my little Volkswagen down, I went to the center of the city, picked up this job and I earned my first $35 as a freelance artist being self employed.

22 Starts to Learn French, and Business Succeeds, Puts a Down Payment on a Home

top

The first month was, the second month was a little better. The third month was very good. And within the first quarter year everything was just running beautifully! We were once again beginning to save a little money. I worked very hard day and night. I taught myself French, went to French night classes and went knocking on doors and generally just “hustled”, as the North American expression goes. And within a year or two had saved up enough money to once again travel the whole continent. And I took my wife and my young child and we went out to the west coast, out to the east coast and then we thought:

“Gee, if this is such a well paying trade, we could afford a house!”

Again, from the thought to the act, not very far removed. We paid a small down payment on a house. In those days you could get bungalows for a down payment of $300, with a 35 year mortgage at 5 and 3 quarters or 6% interest. In other words, it was a young couple’s dream. And sure enough we made a down payment on a beautiful home.

[41:57]

And since we had some money left, we decided we were going to go to Europe while we were young and see Europe as well. So we booked a passage on an ocean liner and we went over to Europe, traveled all over Europe.

23 Develops an Interest in Politics and Meets Adrien Arcand, the Hitler of Canada

top

However, in the meantime I had met and developed an interest in politics and met some very interesting people in Canada. The most notable amongst them was the pre-war leader of a French-Canadian fascist type party called the National Unity Party of Canada. And I had met this individual called Adrien Arcand, the Hitler of Canada. Well, that was to have a tremendous impact on my life because this French-Canadian spoke fluent German, and he had a fantastic library of all books in the German language. And he made these books available to me, allowed me to borrow them.

We discussed the content of these books and lo and behold, it was a French-Canadian who turned me into a German! He showed me the lies of World War II, explained to me the propaganda, the reasons why these lies were told, the instigators of the lies!

24 Visits Europe and Contacts Many People to Further His Political Education

top

And I took a Political Science course. And at the advice of Mr Arcand, took this tour to Europe contacting all kinds of very interesting people in Germany, in Austria, in Italy, in Switzerland, in Spain, in England and in the Scandinavian countries. And I took what you could call a crash course in political history.

25 Enrols in University in Montreal to Study Political Science and History

top

Well, I found on my trip while being over in Europe that certainly my public school education was limited in scope, and I decided to enroll in university as soon as I returned from Germany. I did exactly that. I enrolled in Sir Charles Williams University in Montreal in Political Science and History. I attended university in the evenings. During the day I went after my commercial art business, built up a small thriving studio, and found time to write for German newspapers, the university student newspaper. And above all, I found time to get involved in everyday politics. And we organized demonstrations, mass mailings, and I found that I was a rather shy fellow at the time.

26 Becomes a Public Speaker to Overcome Shyness

top

And so I decided that I had to overcome this shyness. And I sent out a flyer to all the Churches and lodges and unions and all kinds of organizations in human society, in offering myself free of charge, of course, as a speaker. I really only had one topic on there, and the topic was “Communism, a threat to our civilization”. Well, I hadn’t expected a reaction to this. I was literally inundated by requests to come and to speak to youth groups, air cadets, student bodies, church congregations, businessmen clubs, Kiwanis, Rotarians and so on. It was just an incredible situation!

And very soon I began to lose my shyness. I took some speaking training at the Dale Carnegie type courses that were offered, and within a year I had overcome my inborn shyness and developed a very passible speaking style.

28 Becomes an Official Candidate, One of Seven

top

Well, then an event happened in Canadian history. The prime minister of Canada, Lester Pearson, Nobel Peace prize winner, decided that he was going to resign and hand over the prime ministership to the leader of the Liberal Party, that was to be said, selected in the leadership race, which meant that anyone who became leader of the Liberal Party also would become the leader of Canada. And I immediately spotted this as a fantastic opportunity to catapult myself into the public. I had done a tremendous amount of radio talk shows and, as I said, public speaking, writing, had organized some demonstrations of an anti-communist nature, together with some other ethnic groups in the Montreal area. And I was beginning to get known in the country.

And so I decided, fine, I’m going to declare myself as a candidate for the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada. Well, naturally that was somewhat of a sensation because I was only 27 years old. I was, after all, an immigrant, a newcomer to this country. I was still a student at university, although I was also a businessman, a young man at that.

And our second son arrived. This time he was given the German name to reflect the German part of the family heritage. His name was Hans. I became the candidate for the Liberal leadership and traveled the country giving speeches, press conferences, visiting delegates, collecting signatures. What I had to do in order to become a candidate was to be recognized officially by at least 55 prominent Liberal Party Bigwigs. It was the toughest thing I ever did!

[Enter an IMAGE here]

28 Becomes an Official Candidate, One of Seven

top

But ultimately I made it to Ottawa with tenacity and drive and fervor and cajoling and a certain amount of good luck, I suppose. I ended up in the sports stadium in Ottawa. The president of the Liberal Party, after some minor obstacles and evasive measures, had to admit and sign me up as an official candidate of the Liberal Party, one of seven candidates. All the rest of the candidates pretty well were drawn from the cabinet. Multimillionaires, millionaires, very well off people.

And it turns out that although my campaign had cost me three months of my life, $3, 500, the man who ultimately succeeded in capturing the title of leader of the Liberal Party and thereby Prime Minister Canada, Pierre Leotudo, had spent, as compared to my $3, 500, $385,000! Well, number one, I didn’t have the money. Number two, I had no illusions of grandeur that I could from nothing catapult myself to the prime ministership in this country.

[50:00]

29 the Whole Exercise Only a Method to Gain Attention for My Cause

top

However, the whole exercise really was only a method to gain attention for my cause. My cause being that I wanted to have the anti-German propaganda, the lies about Germans and German history, especially the lie of the Germans killing 6 million innocent jews and committing all kinds of war crimes, I wanted to have that stopped!

And I thought, what a terrific platform. And that is exactly what happened. I had myself nationwide publicity as an officially recognized candidate for the Liberal leadership race. I was able to speak to all the delegates. There were 2, 700 delegates and, 205,000 spectators in this lovely sports arena, the Civic Center in Ottawa. 371 radio stations and 500 TV stations across the country were plugged in. Every newspaper was represented there. And certainly my wildest dreams were surpassed in the amount of publicity and coverage I got from my cause.

30 Germans Being Second Class Citizens in Canada

top

And of course, my remarks about Germans being Second Class citizens in this land and so on were broadcast nationwide. Well, that got me to the attention of the German Embassy in Ottawa. And the press attache, together with the ambassador at the time, visited me in the walking space that every arena has behind the rink and was going to congratulate me for my wonderful activities. And I just told him to:

“Go to hell!”

In exactly that many words for being such a coward! Because the three years before that I had appealed to him to do something about this undetermined propaganda in this land and received absolutely no help!

31 a Live Interview Which was Broadcast to Europe in German

top

So now I told him just to:

“Go and beat it!”

Which he did with a shocked expression on his face. Well, the German language section of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation International Service got in touch with me for a live interview which was broadcast to Europe, Trans Oceanic Cable, in German. Again, I could ride an attack against the evils of anti-German brainwashing and propaganda.

And I remember very well how the men in Europe kept saying:

“But this is impossible, but you cannot say this!”

And I had to repeat to him frequently:

“Look, not only am I saying it and you are hearing it, but I’m also meaning it!”

And so he says:

“But this is so unusual!”

I said:

“Listen, I am living in Canada, in the land of unlimited opportunity.”

Well, that’s the way it used to appear, and that’s the way it was in those days, certainly for a young lad of 27.

Well, the leadership race passed. It was certainly a high point in my life, and I had hoped to represent not only the Germans, but also the immigrants in this country.

32 Received Only $105 in Donations for His Efforts to Help the Immigrant Community

top

However, I was soon to be sadly disappointed. Very little interest was shown by the immigrant community! Everybody, I suppose, was busy carving out a new life for themselves, getting started. You know, the usual thing that men do when they start out at the bottom of the heap, clawing their way up. And I received a few hundred letters, few hundred phone calls, expressions of support. But the one area where support can be best measured in this materialistic age, in the monetary area, I received one donation of $5 from a Canadian lady and a donation of $100 from a friend of mine, a German fellow!

In other words, for all my struggles and all my expenses, I received $105 in donations. Well, that made it obvious to me that there was no possibility of doing something meaningful in a full-time professional way.

33 Must Now Return to Business Life and Tend to Mending My Fences

top

And I thought:

“Well, I must now return to business life and tend to mending my fences there.”

And I became the editor or assistant editor of a student newspaper, became also assistant editor for four regional German newspapers in which I basically wrote articles. In the student newspaper. I had my own column called Politics Today, Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. At university I was active in the internal radio and TV service in the community. I was busy giving my speeches and doing a lot of talk shows, radio talk shows at the time. And generally settled down to becoming what you could call “an involved young member” of the community.

34 Separatism by Communists Becomes Violent in Quebec

top

However, it was during that time in the province of Quebec that separatism became violent and communist inroads were very clearly now breaking into the open in the separatist movements. We had bombs going off here, there and everywhere. The communist rhetoric, clenched fist salutes, communist demonstrations, accompanied by violence. Communist demonstrations at university, race riots at our own university took place. And I got more deeply involved in the reasons behind politics, and soon found that a whole new world was opening up to me.

35 Discovered Indeed That There was a Conspiracy to Shape History

top

And I discovered indeed that there was a conspiracy to shape history in a certain way. Well, that called for more study and more learning. And during my appearances I had always found that reporters and detractors and people on radio talk shows kept needling me by saying:

“But you don’t know anything about the places that you speak of, such as Israel, the Middle East, Africa, Asia. You have never been there! You only know your stuff from theory.”

And I was getting so sick and tired of this, answering this, that man can learn indeed by books and by radio programs and by TV programs and so on, that I thought:

“What’s the use!”

And I said to my wife:

“Look, I have the money. I have also the desire. Middle age is creeping up on me. I would like to go and see these far off places and to inform myself firsthand.”

[57:38]

35 Discovered Indeed That There was a Conspiracy to Shape History

top

We sold our house. We took the proceeds from the money, my wife rented an apartment, stayed at home with the children in the province of Quebec. And Ernst went off on a world tour! And for seven and a half months I first toured all Europe, from the North Cape practically Bergen, Lapland, Finland, northern Sweden, Sweden, Denmark, Scotland, northern Scotland, Hadrian’s Wall, all the way through Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Italy, and so on through Germany, Austria.

And then I left Europe behind and went to Greece, down to Turkey, to the Middle East, Israel, Cyprus, then to Cairo, and from there on south through black Africa, all the way to South Africa, Rhodesia, till I ultimately arrived at the southernmost tip at the Cape of Good Hope.

From there I retraced my steps, went over to Iran, India, Pakistan, Southeast Asia at that time to war in Vietnam, Warsan, Cam Ranh Bay, from there to Thailand to Cambodia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, from Taiwan onto Japan, Japan to Hawaii, from Hawaii, back home to the United States and Canada.

I can say that I learned a tremendous amount amongst people of these strange cultures, strange traditions, strange races.

37 Suffered Culture Shock, Race Shock!

top

Well, I returned from this world trip, which really was a study tour for which I had prepared a number of years through studying at university, reading books, looking over old historical battlefields, cultural history of Greece, ancient Rome, ancient Aryan civilizations, Buddhism and so on. I went to all these historical places to give myself a feel of how it was, how it might have been then. How it was today. It was an incredible, overwhelming experience.

And I actually have to say that I suffered culture shock, race shock! I suddenly found myself sometimes absolutely alone for days amongst people of different racial backgrounds, standing out like a sore thumb amongst Asians, Indians, blacks, Arabs. It was an absolutely worthwhile experience which I can only recommend to all those who inspire for leadership. It is an absolute must!

Nothing beats practical first hand knowledge, and seeing with one own’s eyes, feeling with one own’s hands and soul, smelling these people of different races, the stench of millions in Bombay, sleeping on the sidewalk. Tasting their strange foods, seeing how primitive many areas of the globe still are, being whisked by jet from the Stone Age to the Space Age.

And I remember sitting in a hotel in India the day when the American space program finally put an American on the moon. And here I was, the only White man amongst all these people. And I asked them:

“What do you think about that?”

And they answered me without any second thoughts and saying:

“Ha! More Hollywood movies. It is impossible that man could do this!”

They just could not perceive that man actually had, thanks to Western technology, through German thought and American money and the industrial capacity of the Western world, in effect. Placed a man on the moon and had reached out for the stars.

It was then that that I realized that:

“Oh yes, there was a difference, that we were different!”

And I then determined to look into the race question far more deeply than I had before.

When I returned to Canada, immediate problems of child rearing, children raising, rebuilding a business, of course, took all my attention. We decided that the best route for us as a family would be to return to Ontario, because in the province of Quebec, separatism by now was absolutely rampant. And since I had been one of the most outstanding, outspoken public figures against the separatist movement, my wife was under constant threat to have our children kidnapped, to have herself molested. And our house was frequently painted with communist and separatist slogans. Added to this was the constant harassment by the Canadian secret police, the plain clothed police of the city of Montreal, who for some strange reason all ganged up on me, who was leading the fight against separatism.

And only later did it dawn on me the reason why I was such an unpopular public personage was that I combined youth, drive, talent, and of course a very clear understanding of the real forces that are at work in Western society and especially in North American and Canadian society, and made no bones about it, and set about organizing an effective resistance against it. So I of course was prime target!

However, since my immigrant community did not feel that they should make a contribution, politically speaking, in Canada, the English Canadians looked at me askance because of course I was berating them for their anti-German bigotry. The jewish community in Canada was frightened because of course I claimed, based on pretty good authority, that there never were 6 million gas jews in Europe and that the Zionists in effect were running a gigantic extortion racket against the German people using the media of the world! So in effect, I was like a prophet in the wilderness.

I had in effect, no power base whatsoever! The only power base that I have was the money that I generated with my own hands, doing my artwork, through the sale of my paintings, through some of my writings, some small fees for public speaking. But really the only people backing me were people who had come to me, converts through my lectures, talks, features, articles, radio shows. But it was just nowhere nearly enough to say that I was going to be able to become a political force in Canadian life. I therefore did make the step and did move back to English speaking Ontario. I retreated, so to speak, into myself, more study to digest what I had learned.

And I did put to use what I had learned in radio talk shows, TV talk shows. Some of the country’s leading TV programs approached me to become a guest on their shows or to be participating as a panelist, and I did exactly that.

One program in Toronto that I participated in several times was the Crossfire program, a program that was delving into controversial issues at the time, such as draft dodging by American Vietnam draftees, modern art, corruption and so on. And I enjoyed myself immensely and was quite popular on these programs. These programs of course, were seen by other TV and radio producers who in turn invited me onto their programs.

[1:08:10]

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

[1:54:44]

END

top

============================================

BitChute Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/31/2025 = 2)

4 years ago
Patriot Gus
Please contact Gus Stefanis Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party.

4 years ago
ShanRiHa
Zundel is undoubtedly a fantastic German who was dedicated to telling the truth about these jews and what they’ve deliberately done to Germany and its people. This relentless attack upon Ernst because of his honesty and commitment to exposing the truth about these jews and what they did to the German people and for this they’ve attacked him using jewish Liars like Lipsdat etc to attempt to defame and ridicule him in the Courts etc. Ernst has shown us all what these evil jews have done and are still doing to this day and for that he has earned the respect of many. Vale Ernst Zundel.
Peace.

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 13198

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Mon, Nov 10, 2025 — Transcript completed = 68/115 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Thu, Aug 21, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 60/115 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes BitChute comments (2).

Joel Davis – The Goonright Pipeline – with Mark Collett – Aug 6, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:11:17 +0000

Joel Davis

The Goonright Pipeline

with Mark Collett

Wed, Aug 6, 2025

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and guest Mark Collett discuss his deportation from Sweden and being banned from travel to EU countries for 15 years, all because of his legal activism!

– KATANA]

https://rumble.com/v6x7hns-the-goonright-pipeline.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6

my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis

follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://whiteaustralia.org

Published on Wed, Aug 6, 2025

Description

1:49:53
Enable
The Goonright Pipeline
Joel Davis
6.67K followers
Follow
173
3
Repost
Comments
Share
Streamed on:
Aug 6, 6:16 am EDT
6.16K
News
Republican Politics
Goonright Joel and Blair Mark Collett Joel Davis Blair Cottrell Thomas Sewell Jacob Hersant National Socialist Network
follow Mark on telegram: https://t.me/markacollett
my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis
follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell
follow Tom on telegram: https://t.me/tomsewelluncensored
follow Jacob on telegram: https://t.me/herrcent
Show less
28 Comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 19,883 – Duration: 110 mins)

01 Introducing Special Guest Mark Collett from Patriotic Alternative, UK

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

04 No Right to Remain Silent

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

17 Big Demo on Saturday This Week in a Place Called Newark

18 Multiculturalism in Its Entirety is a Complete Failure!

19 Tommy’s Poisonous Message Supports Mass Immigration Except for Muslims

20 Joel on the “Goon Right”, Aka the “Horny Right”, or Pro-Sex Right

[Contents In Progress]

01 Introducing Special Guest Mark Collett from Patriotic Alternative, UK

top

Joel Davis: We are live. It is 6th August, 2025, and big stream for you this evening. We apologise for not being with you Sunday night. Things came up for Blair and Tom and I didn’t want to do the stream on my own. Not that I can’t do it on my own, I’ve done it on my own before. But the topic, it just wouldn’t have been as fun if it was me on my own. So I decided to save the stream. We decided to edge, we decided to hold our balls. And here we are on Wednesday and we have Mark Collett with us, our friend. I think he’s the first time he’s been on the show. We’ve gone on his show like a million times between us but nice to have Mark on the show all the way from sunny England and he’s been through some drama lately.

But first I just want to mention we have our national meet, our national conference this weekend. This is your last chance. If you want to get vetted and come White Australia.org go to White Australia.org. We just updated the website today actually it looks, it looks schmick, it looks clean. New update on the website. You can go there, you can sign up as a supporter and if you sign up as a supporter you can get an invite to get vetted and come to this weekend’s events.

On Saturday we have the White powerlifting event in the morning, in the afternoon we then have a festival that evening. We’re going to have music. Every different genre of music is going to happen. We’re going to have folk, we’re going to have RAC. We’re going to have rap music for the Zoomers, White nationalists. I know I didn’t sign off on this personally but there’s going to be White nationalist rap and there’s going to be a Sun and Rave late that evening which I’m particularly excited about. It’s going to be a jam packed evening and then on Sunday we’re going to have a conference, we’re going to do speeches. Where I get up to all kinds of shenanigans, it’s going to be huge. It’s going to be the biggest conference we’ve ever done. We’re expecting hundreds and hundreds of people. Be the biggest National Socialist conference to occur in the southern hemisphere maybe ever, at least outside of Argentina. So be there, White Australia.org.

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

top

But anyway, Mark, great to have you on the show. Obviously you made the news recently because you tried to go to Sweden, I believe to attend some kind of nationalist event. I don’t actually know what the event was.

And then you were not allowed basically into Sweden. You’re interned in the airport. And not only were you deported back to Britain, but you’re banned from the EU for 15 years, which is something that I haven’t really heard of before the dissidents.

There’s been many times where dissidents have been kicked out. But to be banned for 15 years is wild! And you didn’t actually do anything. You just showed up to speak at a conference. I’m sure you’ve travelled to Europe literally maybe 100 times in your life because you live in Europe. Must kind of suck being banned from the rest of the continent for 15 years. But what I’ve noticed lately, that political dissidents around the world are being treated worse and worse by Western governments. They’re blocking everyone from going to each other’s conferences. And this is probably the most egregious example of this year. So what exactly happened?

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll now only be referred to publicly as my new title, which is “The Most Dangerous Man in Europe”! A 15 year ban, de-banked from every bank and banned from every social media platform. There is literally no one in Europe who has experienced the level of political persecution that I have, where I actually, I can’t travel. And it’s not just Europe, you see, this is the Schengen Zone, which people might believe is just the freedom of movement countries that are part of the EU, but it actually extends to other European countries like Switzerland, that aren’t even in the EU.

So this is a really big deal! And legally it also extends to other countries that aren’t even in Europe. So this carries over to places like Canada and America. Once you’re placed on this list, you aren’t even free to travel to non-European countries. This will have a massive impact on my life and more so on my family’s life, because it means I can’t even take a foreign holiday with my kids. You would think this is the kind of treatment that would be reserved for someone like Carlos the Jackal or Osama Bin Laden or someone who is really in the public consciousness as sort of bad guy number one.

But that is reserved now for me, for an ethno-nationalist, because I was traveling to a peaceful, lawful social gathering, a community gathering at the Free Sweden, Summer Festival. You see, the Free Sweden, Movement is a group in Sweden that buys land and has acquired two villages which their members and supporters have moved to. They’ve taken over. They’ve clustered there. So all other ethnic groups do this, like Muslims, jews, blacks. When they come to the West, they all move to the same area of the country. They create their own centres, they buy up the local buildings, the community centres. They control the infrastructure, they build their own places of worship, and they then control those areas and run them to the benefit of their community. White people have started doing that now all over the world. They’re doing it in Sweden. And this is something that the government does not want to fund.

[05:29]

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

top

In fact, the government fears. And I was going over to Sweden to partake in this community social gathering, and I was going to make a short speech there. I was also going to have a meal on the Friday evening.

Whenever I travel abroad, I’m always ready at passport control to say exactly where I’m staying, to say who I’m meeting. I have the details of the people who are collecting me from the airport in case they need to call them. I have the details of the hotel, and I also have the details of my flight returning home so that I can prove exactly where I’m going, who I’ll be with and when I’ll be leaving, because they’re the basic requirements.

Now, I arrived in Sweden and I entered the queue to go through passport control and I was immediately approached by two police officers, a black man and a White woman. And I’m sure this was done for effect, …

Blair Cottrell: Was that before you scanned your passport or? Is that what happened?

Mark Collett: Yeah. You’re through passport control, they can’t do anything with you are then in Sweden and different laws apply.

However, when you are in the airport before passport controls, you are treated completely differently. The same is true in Britain. So in Britain, if you’re arrested in the airport, you are subject to normal British laws.

04 No Right to Remain Silent

top

However, if you’re arrested before you have scanned your passport and come through, you are subject to completely different laws. And just briefly, the laws are so different that if you were arrested the right side of passport control on British soil, leaving the airport, you have a right to remain silent. You have a right to legal representation. You can say:

“I don’t want to say a word until my solicitor gets here.”

You have a right to contact people or make a phone call. However, if you are arrested before passport control in Britain, you have no right to legal representation. You can be held indefinitely, you have no right to contact anyone, and you have no right to maintain your silence. And such is the coercive nature of this, you are actually compelled under law to hand over all of the passwords for any device you’re carrying, and failure to do so means you are immediately guilty of a terror offence where you can be jailed for up to five years.

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

top

Blair Cottrell: That sounds familiar. I had my whole house searched by Australian Federal police just a couple of weeks ago and they told me the same thing. So those laws must have been copy pasted.

Mark Collett: Yep!

Blair Cottrell: As part of Australian terror legislation. They said you’re assumed guilty of a serious offence and that you’re trying to hide it if you don’t unlock your device and you can be jailed for up to five years.

So as I said, familiar with that particular piece of legislation. But so they approached you before you scanned your passport, meaning they knew you were coming.

Mark Collett: They knew I was coming. They pulled me out. It was a black male with a shaved head and like one of those Muslim sort of beard things around the bottom of his neck and White woman who looked like she could have been a model.

And I think they sort of paired them together to see if I would overreact or I turn into the devil, take on another form when I see two police officers that are racially mixed. You know, my horns start to show and a tail, you know, comes out of my back and then my wings sprout!

And at that point they can just jail me indefinitely.

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

top

But obviously I took this in my stride. I was honest with them. Then they took me to a room and interrogated me. They interrogated me on everything as well, I mean, absolutely everything! So like where I went to school, where I grew up my family, do I have children. They even pulled up pictures of my ex-girlfriend on like a computer monitor.

Blair Cottrell: What was the point of that? For what purpose?

Mark Collett: Well, you see, the thing is, I am quite a cheeky person and when people are sort of questioning me, I’ll always try to sort of inject a little bit of levity into the situation. So the black guy says:

“You know, can you explain this?”

And obviously he was pointing at her large swastika tattoo when he said, can you explain this?

And I said:

“Well look, I can.”

And they both sort of looked at me and said:

“What’s he gonna say?”

I said:

“Well, I was in my mid-30s, I was going through a bit of a dry patch with relationships. And then it’s extremely hot but extremely crazy girl approached me and you, …”

And I point out, I said:

“You know what it’s like when you get the hot crazy thing. You just dive straight in! And it’s an amazing ride, but it’s like a roller coaster. One minute it’s up, one minute it’s down!”

And he starts laughing.

And then the woman sort of looks over and so, like:

“You’re not going to laugh. You stop, Stop! This is meant to be serious!”

And he’s laughing and he’s like:

“Oh, you don’t need this to explain this one to me!”

And he’s like, getting with it. I said:

“But then she moves in and it gets even crazy and you can’t handle it. And, oh, my God!”

But you know what? And I was about to talk, and he was like:

“Say no more!”

And then she starts to giggle. And it sort of broke the sort of tension in the room. But they were asking everything.

[11:05]

And then eventually, when they’d asked all their questions, they sort of kicked me out of the room. I sat in this sort of holding area, which was very relaxed. They did offer me. They said:

“Would you like a coffee? Would you like water? No food, but just coffee and water.”

I said:

“No, thanks. I don’t drink coffee.”

I only drink like energy drinks. And I wasn’t really in the mood for anything and I wasn’t going to be cheeky, but, like, I’ll fetch me a Red Bull or anything like that. I was just like:

“Look, I’m gonna sit here and wait.”

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

top

So I sat there and then I thought, can I get out of the room? Which I figured out I could. And I had sort of a little wander because I need to go to the toilet. And then I came back, sat down, and they sort of come and grab me. Took a few hours, took me back into the room. This time there’s four officers present.

And then they read me this judgement. And the judgement is the most insane thing you’ve ever heard! They begin by telling me I’m going to be denied entry and that I’m going to be banned for 15 years from the Schengen Zone because:

“I’m a threat to public order, a threat to the fundamental fabric of society, and a threat to the values on which Sweden and the EU were built!”

And I’m like:

“Oh, my God!”

I’m sat there at this point. And then immediately I go for my phone because I want to text somebody and say:

“Look, this is getting serious!”

And they’re like:

“No, put the phone down, you’re not allowed to touch your phone.”

And then like, they all start coming towards me because there’s four of them at this point. And I’m like:

“Oh, God!”

So they go through all the stuff they asked me if I accept what they’ve said and so you can sign it to say you understand, but you don’t have to sign it. But if you don’t sign it makes no difference. I was being a little bit, sort of silly. I said:

“Well, the signature might be worth something one day, so here you go.”

And I signed it, put pushed the paperwork back over. They said:

“Have I got anything left to say?”

And I said:

“No.”

Obviously at this point I’ve not got my luggage, I’ve not got my passport, all I’ve got is what’s in my hand luggage. And they’re like:

“Look you are going to be taken out of Sweden now.”

So they start walking me, two of the women then start walking me back to the departure lounge. I said:

“Well, what’s going to happen?”

They’re like:

“Well, we’ll book you on a plane or you can you could always book yourself on one.”

And I’m like:

“Well, I can’t book myself on one because I haven’t got a passport and I can’t board anything because I haven’t got a passport and I don’t know where my luggage is.”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

top

And this is where the real ordeal starts. For 25 hours I sat in the departure lounge. No word from the authorities, no word from the police, no food, no water, no bed, no access to my luggage, which contained all like my toothbrush, my toothpaste, change of clothes, etc, all I had was my hand luggage which had a little games console in it, one of my big Hoodies which was like so good that it had that Hoodie in there because that’s what kept me sort of warm, had my charging cables, it had a fast charger which I couldn’t use because my bloody travel adapters were in my luggage. And there was no way I was spending like 20 quid on a new travel adapter to use it for like one day. There’s absolutely no way I was doing that. And all I could eat was what’s in the airport. And the airport is like the most expensive place in the world to eat. I think a burger and chips with a drink would have been about 30 pounds. So I was like, no way am I doing that.

But they have these little, these hot dog machines in Sweden and there’s like six different flavours of hot dogs and they were only a couple of pounds each.

So I was just basically living off these hot dogs and cans of Coke, own cans of Red Bull. And I did that for 25 hours whilst I sleeping on these sort of seats so sleeping on these seats, it was really not particularly good. And I went to the departure terminals and I looked at when there was flights and I kind of guessed which flight it would be, to be honest, because there was only one direct flight back and they weren’t legally allowed to fly me via any other country.

So there were loads of flights back, but they all had a short layover of like 50 minutes. But I wasn’t allowed to legally touch down in another country.

Blair Cottrell: Have you been to Sweden before, Mark?

[15:16]

Mark Collett: Yeah, and this is the incredible thing. I’ve been to Europe loads of times, tons of different European countries. I’ve even done work in the European Parliament.

And on top of that, I’ve given speeches from about 2017 onwards, I’ve been consistently making speeches on European soil. I’ve never broken the law. There’s never been any criminality, any disorder. There’s never been any trouble at any of these events that I’ve spoken at. I’ve not got a criminal record. You know, I’m a family man, I’m a law abiding citizen. Everything I said was lawful, everything I was planning to say was lawful. This was just pure political persecution.

And just a few months ago I spoke in Finland at an event and Finland’s another Nordic country. There’s freedom of movement between the Nordic countries to get to Finland. You know, sometimes you, I’ve gone to Finland before and had a layover in Sweden. I’ve spoken in Sweden before.

So all the precedents were that as I was somebody with a clean criminal record, somebody who had a place to stay, contacts in Sweden, somebody who’d been there before, who travelled extensively to Europe and had never ever been involved in any disorder, criminality or immoral or unlawful activity, there was no reason to stop me, detain me, let alone deport me or ban me. But this is basically what we have to put up with but the really shocking thing was the 15 year ban! Because 15 years is an incredibly long period of time. That’s the kind of thing you’d expect for somebody who had been maybe a gun runner, or a terrorist or involved in some kind of major financial fraud across international boundaries. But this is for a 25 or 30 minute speech and they were so bothered about this 25 or 30 minute speech, they were willing to take away all my rights, treat me horrendously.

And this is all at a time where migrants are turning up on European shores without any paperwork, any background checks are being immediately taken to hotels, being given the finest food, being given, you know, clothes, being given, spending money, always have a bed to sleep in. If they’d have treated a migrant like that, there would have been a queue of human rights lawyers, you know, round the block waiting to represent them. And through the whole time I was there, I was never offered representation, I was never allowed to have somebody present with me when I was being questioned. The whole thing, you know, it was a bit of an ordeal.

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

top

And eventually, after 25 hours, they walk through the terminal, they get hold of me, they march me off to a gate, they have my passport and a fresh boarding pass in a bag. They board me first in front of everyone, like:

“Look, this is a dangerous guy!”

You know, everyone’s looking because it’s like:

“Why has the police got this one guy? Why is he being sat near the front of the plane?”

You know, they take you down, they’re about to watch you walk on the plane when they’ve got you in that sort of like extendable arm that goes from the airport to the plane, that’s when they give your passport back and then they watch you walk onto the plane once you’re on the plane and the passport’s being given back, etc, etc. That is when they leave and obviously then you’re flown back.

And luckily I passed through Manchester airport without any like, bother. It was the plane arrived early and I got home safe and sound. But it was weird because I left Friday morning at sort of 5:30 AM my time. That’s when I left my house and I got back Saturday night at about 11:00 PM.

So I was gone sort of maybe about 40 hours, but it really felt and technically I hadn’t been gone a day because I’d seen the wife and kids Friday morning before I left and I saw them Saturday night when I got home, but it felt a lot longer and it was quite stressful, but it was certainly an experience and I think it’s opened a lot of people’s eyes to just how biased the system is, how tyrannical the system is and how it targets nationalists.

Blair Cottrell: Oh, we’re definitely! I can sense and feel, and as a result of your story and a few other stories, what I’ve experienced recently, we’re on a new tier of oppression. Even though, as I said on Hermes stream just yesterday or the day before, there’s a lot more meme slop, Nazi memes being allowed on X and Instagram and stuff. The people who actually have potential to produce community organisations, political parties and actually affect politics in a real world way, these individuals are being targeted more than ever!

So even though there’s this illusion on a surface level of more free speech being allowed on social media, here in the real world for people like us, things are really being ramped up. You can really feel that. Can you do anything about this? Have you looked into ways.

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

top

Mark Collett: I want to comment on what you’ve just said. This has been something that’s been happening a lot. So I think the system knows that people are annoyed.

And I think if I’d taken the path of being Mark Collett, the content creator and all I’d ever done was produce videos and social media posts, I think I’d be back on YouTube now. I think I’d be on X. Because they want to allow a certain degree of freedom to cool things off. And the freedom they want to allow is they want to allow some talking heads on X on YouTube so that people can log on and think:

“This is all going in the right direction. We got somebody on YouTube again, like Mark, who’s going to speak our language. I can watch that. It feels good. Somebody’s regurgitating points that I would make myself. I can listen to him and I feel like somebody’s speaking for me.”

Then they log off and they do nothing else.

[21:21]

However, what they’re really scared of and what they’re clamping down on is people like myself saying:

“I want to be more than a content creator. I want to organise in the real world. I want people to get out there to protest, to demonstrate. To organise, to be involved in legal advocacy, to be involved in activism.”

That’s what they fear. We saw this with Patriotic Alternative. We saw it with the NJP. We’ve seen it with the Nordic Resistance in Sweden. We’ve seen it with White Australia, with you guys down under. We’ve seen it extensively in Canada with the anti-Covid trucker movement. They were de-platformed. They had all their money taken from them. Many of them were arrested.

But if you’re just going to talk online, they are giving people a bit of breathing space. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing! I want more people talking online, but the real tip of the spear is people who want to do some form of real world community activity. We’re the ones who are being done.

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

top

And in terms of, can I fight this? I am putting in an appeal. I’ve got 21 days. The Free Sweden, Movement have said that they’re going to fund that. They’ve got a lawyer acting. I sent in very promptly. So yesterday I had my full statement of facts worked out, because all I can really do is give a statement of fact and my statement of fact, I can give you the kind of thing I’ve put in my statement of fact. It’s like what I travelled for, what I was going to do, whether I’ve committed crime before, where I’ve been to before, and literally the things I’ve just told you now.

So I just list all the facts and then at the end, say:

“Based on all of the factual evidence presented, this is a undemocratic and disproportionate punishment for somebody who has never committed a crime and was not intending to commit a crime.”

But whether the appeal will be successful, I don’t know. Because one thing that strikes you really hard when you’re in this situation is you’ve seen so many reports in the mainstream media of migrant rapists, migrant criminals, all being represented by human rights lawyers and being told that they won’t be deported because they’ve got human rights. And deporting them would be hard for them and their family.

But then you’re sat there and they’re in no human rights! There’s no one queuing up to help you. There’s no excuses, there’s no:

“Well, it might hurt your feeling, it might impact your family, it might affect your ability to take your children on holiday.”

There’s none of that.

But here in the UK, if you’re trying to deport a migrant rapist who’s got a kid on UK soil, it’s:

“Well you can’t deprive that child of his dad. You can’t!”

There’s been people who have said things like:

“I’m really fond of the food in the UK. And it would damage my digestive system if I had to go back to my native country and eat the slop they serve. So, oh, well, we better let him stay then. He likes the food!”

It’s any excuse, really. But for people like us, that it’s not that there are no excuses. You can’t even make legitimate arguments and no one’s willing to make a legitimate argument on your behalf.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, it seems like in the same way that certain talking heads are allowed on social media to placate the consumers, as you were suggesting, these are legal avenues which apparently exist for us to defend ourselves or make complaints. They all seem to be a road to nowhere, don’t they? It’s just like a waste of time and money. If you’re a dissident, you don’t actually have any rights. It’s very corrupt.

Mark Collett: Well, on the issue that, I want to say one last thing. When you said waste of time and money. So you also noticed that I went through this and I’ve not asked for anything. There was no donation button, there was no special support fund. There was no grifting Canadian, you know, lawyer going and making YouTube videos saying:

“You know, save Mark Collett!”

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

top

There’s no, you know, raft of domain names that were prepared 48 hours before I flew save Mark Collett.com or get Mark back from Sweden.com. There was none of that I paid for the airport food myself. I paid for the train fares to and from the airport myself. I got back home, dealt with it, didn’t have anyone pick me up, didn’t need a defense fund. You don’t need to grift off anything.

And compare that to Tommy Robinson who recently, you know, knocked somebody out at a station and this guy had to be resuscitated and put in intensive care. He fled to Spain, was allowed to walk into Spain and because he was going to be arrested when he got back, there was a, you know, Save Tommy fund set up before he even arrived back in the UK. People donating tens of thousands of pounds.

But for somebody like me, we do it the honest way. We’re not here to sort of nickel and dime anyone over the slightest issue. It’s a bad issue, but I also wanted to set a precedent when this happened that we don’t always need to start rattling a tin and begging for cash the minute something, you know, goes slightly wrong. Because we’re a lot better than people like the Tommy Robinsons and the Avi Yemenis and all the others who were just in it to make money and to basically lead people down a dead end street.

Blair Cottrell: Well, Tommy’s got a lot of hand rubbers around him, so he might not even come up with those schemes himself. They probably you know, cook up ideas like that, how they can leverage and exploit certain circumstances he finds himself in.

[26:54]

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

top

Joel Davis: Well, no, Tommy loves the cocaine and like one of the best, like cocaine activities is coming up with business ideas. So he’s probably sitting there doing lines of coke with all these kikes and just scheming, you know.

Blair Cottrell: Is that like a confirmed thing that he likes the cocaine or you’re just making it?

Joel Davis: Oh yeah, man!

Mark Collett: No, no, no!

Joel Davis: The nose rubbing is out of control.

Mark Collett: Sniffing, nose rubbing, licking his lips. If you watch him as well, whenever he does a he’s always going backwards and forwards, sort of shaking, he’s very red in the face. I’ve known a lot of lads who’ve liked some of the white stuff and he seems to be in late stage as an observation. Allegedly. He looks like he’s the kind of guy who’s in late stage, sort of cocaine addiction where, …

Blair Cottrell: Well, I suppose cocaine’s its a lot more available, isn’t it, in England? Like there’s not many cocaine addicts in Australia.

Joel Davis: What are you talking about?

Blair Cottrell: It’s a lot more expensive to get. So well, not unless you really like what?

Joel Davis: There’s plenty of cocaine. I don’t know what you’re talking about, but, …

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, I don’t know, who you run with Joel Davis, but I don’t know any. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: I’ll hang out with you! Not saying anything.

Mark Collett: Yeah, well, Tommy was very, … Recently, Keith Woods. It might, not recently, maybe six months ago, maybe a year ago.

Joel Davis: Is Keith Woods on the fucking powder these days?

Mark Collett: Well, no, Keith Woods made a comment about Tommy on X. And Tommy had like a meltdown and the way he was acting to the camera, you could see his eyes were bulging, they were bright red, he was twitching his nose, he was rocking back and forward. His behaviour, he doesn’t look like he’s a guy who is all together there anymore.

And I think you know his recent behaviour as well. Sort of whacking that guy in the train station, you know, 64 year old guy, knocking him out. I don’t know, I think if I, if I’d have done something like that, all my close friends would have been like:

“Mate, what’s going wrong?”

You know, if it’s a 64 year old guy shouting something like, you just walk away, you know, hitting somebody like that it’s not some sort of, it’s not some big honourable win, is it? It’s not like you fought off, you know, 20 Muslims in the station, it’s not like you transformed into John Wick and did something really amazing! You whacked some old fellow and left him in a coma.

Blair Cottrell: Who knows, inside his own mind, who knows how glorious that moment really was? Look, you don’t know, right? I get it, and I agree. Because especially when you’ve got a reputation, a public reputation, like Tommy Robinson, you’re going to have people who approach you and want to shake your hand, and you’re going to have people who don’t like you as well. Used to happen to me down here in Australia.

But, you know, it may have just been that perfect storm of circumstances, and that was the last thing, the straw that broke the camel’s back on that particular day. You know, it might have been a fight with the wife in the morning and then screaming kids all the way to the station. And then something else. You know what I mean? Yeah.

Mark Collett: Five lines of coke! Ezra’s on the phone demanding another fundraiser. And finally somebody goes:

“Oi, Tommy! You’re racist bastard!”

In the next minute, that’s it.

Blair Cottrell: I mean, Ezra says:

“Hey, perfect. Good idea, Tommy. That’s the perfect thing we need. Let’s start the fundraisers to free Tommy from legal consequence for his, … Improvised. Good man!”

But [chuckling] anyway, hey, I’m sorry that happened to you, man! It was like, especially they didn’t give you a hotel or anything. You’re laying on those airport chairs trying to sleep under a Hoodie.

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

top

Mark Collett: But the craziest thing was there was a Muslim woman as well in there, and she come from France, and for some reason they were trying to send her back to Paris. So it wasn’t like somebody said:

“Oh, well, they were deporting a Muslim as well!”

Well, deporting her back to Paris. But they weren’t sending her back to Beirut or [chuckling] something like that they were sending her to Paris, probably where she was born, London and Paris are just completely overwhelmed. But the weird thing was I was doing a stream with Red Ice and she started squawking because I was making too much noise. And then she sort of called over like a police officer, and I was like:

“Oh, man, I don’t need this as well.”

And then later on, she came over to where I was and asked for my Hoodie. She was like, because I got this big White Hoodie which is dead comfortable and it’s like an oversized one. And that was like my life saving. She’s like:

“Oh, I’m all cold!”

She didn’t speak English, but she tried broken English. She was like, rubbing her arms like:

“I’m cold. Give me your Hoodie.”

And I’m like:

“Yeah, you’re not having my Hoodie.”

Blair Cottrell: All you had to cover yourself. The only item that you really had, that Hoodie, a random Muslim being deported tried to take that from you! [chuckling]

Mark Collett: Yeah. She’s like:

“I’m gonna be cold!”

I was like:

“Yeah, but if I give it to you, then I’m gonna be cold as well. It’s like, if I had two Hoodies, you know, I’d consider it. But I only have one Hoodie and it’s for me.”

And later on, she came over and she’s like:

“Oh, my phone charger’s not working.”

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

top

Obviously you didn’t say my phone charger. But she sort of did the pointing and showing. And she was like:

“Can you fix my phone charger?”

So I was like, God! And I went and fixed her phone charger for her. It was just comical. It was I’m trapped there for being the world’s biggest racist. You know, I’ve just been designated the most dangerous man in Europe. Yet, there’s a Muslim woman trapped in there with me, and she’s literally depending on me to keep her warm and charge her phone. I genuinely think that says a lot about the European spirit and the way that immigration genuinely works or doesn’t work, [chuckling] depending on your perspective.

[32:26]

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! Good analogy. And it really is in our nature, isn’t it, to just lend assistance when requested?

Mark Collett: Well, I’m never rude to anyone. This is the thing. I think I’m the least rude person in the world! I think I’ve only ever really sworn on stream, like, seriously, maybe, like, twice. And that was at somebody who couldn’t get a computer game working and hadn’t downloaded the maps. You know I’m generally a pretty chilled guy, except for when I’m gaming and getting angry with people. But, like I’m never rude to anyone. I’m not rude to anyone of who’s from an ethnic minority. I’m just generally quite pleasant. And if anyone wants to interview me or talk to me or whatever, I’m always sort of friendly and polite to everyone I meet. I’ve got this policy of being kind to everybody unless they do something bad to me, because I like to present the best face possible for our cause.

Yet I have been treated worse than anyone! And that’s just the crazy thing. And people actually contacted me saying, of all people that they’ve stopped going into Europe because, again, people like Tommy Robinson, who’ve got, like, extensive criminal records, are allowed to travel freely. But me, somebody who has no criminal record and is always makes pains to be so polite and reasonable to everyone is absolutely crapped upon! And then my wife’s on the phone and she’s like:

“I can’t believe this!”

She’s [chuckling] like:

“What if they don’t let you come home? What are we gonna do?”

She’s like:

“What if they detain you at Manchester for 48 hours? How are we gonna deal with this?”

And obviously, it puts a lot of stress on my family. It puts a lot of stress on the wife. Your friend Dan Pal, he rang me when I was in the airport to say hello!

Blair Cottrell: Really? Wow!

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] because, you see, when he rang, he was like:

“Hi, you trapped!”

I was like:

“Hi, mate, how you doing?”

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

top

It’s like [chuckling] the amount of people that rang me from all over the world was really heartening!

And I’ve got to say, joking aside, that was the thing that kept me going. You guys messaged me. People from America, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, people from all over Europe messaged me. Sasha Rossmuller, Marcus in Sweden, Henrik and Lana. I’m gonna forget some names here, but just everyone who rang me and messaged me. From the bottom of my heart, thank you! That’s what keeps you smiling, like you’re there. You don’t know what’s going to happen. They also give you, like, subtle threats like:

“Oh, well, we might make you pay for your own flight back.”

And you’re like:

“Oh, God!”

But, you know, everyone messaging you and sort of like keeping your spirits up and sharing, like, memes and stuff. No Chance in Scotland. He was great! You know, all these people, that’s what kept you smiling.

And I’ve always said from day one that we are creating a community, and community, like brotherhood in-group preference. That’s the important thing! And when it comes through, that’s worth more than anything. That’s worth more than a, you know, Avi Yemeni, you know, Israeli fundraiser. What matters is knowing that you’ve got White people all over the world who’ve got your back.

And that’s why they’re so scared. They’re scared because when they crapped on me, they saw thousands of people tens of thousands in my corner outraged! And that’s what they’re worried about. They’re worried about a White community with in-group preference that organises in a peaceful manner.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! It does seem that way. And it almost seems like they’re getting desperate. I actually think they run things through AI estimating models.

And basically what the AI is telling them is:

“Unless you shut this down, unless you target the main figureheads for this community, this thing is going to become huge! This thing is going to get out of control. Everyone’s going to vote for these guys and this is going to be the next big political thing.”

17 Big Demo on Saturday This Week in a Place Called Newark

top

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’ve got a big demo on Friday. Sorry, not Friday. Big demo on Saturday this week in a place called Newark.

And when I was on social media, you know, I’d million viewed videos on YouTube, massive YouTube account. I had a massive Twitter account with 60,000 followers before Musk I was getting tweets which were viewed by millions of people. I had incredible interactions on there. They know that if I had that back, this demo this weekend, there might be 5,000 people there. But they’re absolutely, …!

And none of this is getting me down either because like I’m out this weekend demonstration. I don’t care! I’m going to be there. I’m gonna be at the forefront, I’m going to be making a speech, I’m going to be speaking my mind. I’m not going to be changing my message. This is about ensuring the future of White Britons. And that’s what it’s all always been about the number one issue of today is the future of White people! And they don’t want anyone saying that.

They don’t mind Tommy standing up. And the reason they don’t mind Tommy standing up is he’s got a really subversive message. His message is:

“That multiculturalism fundamentally works. It’s all okay and it chugs along. But the spoke in the wheel is just these Muslims. And if we get rid of the Muslims, but we keep the jews, the blacks, the Hindus, the Sikhs in the we keep the West Indians. If we celebrate the Windrush generation, if we keep the gay Pride events, that’s all going to be good and it’ll all work. But it’s just the Muslims that spoil it because they don’t like the gay pride and they’re not that fond of the Indians and they do bad things to White people. If you get rid of them. And they’re a threat to the jews, of course! Get rid of them, society will be great.”

[38:13]

18 Multiculturalism in Its Entirety is a Complete Failure!

top

Well, that’s absolute crap! Because multiculturalism in its entirety is a complete failure! And what they’re scared of is someone like me saying:

“No, multiculturalism doesn’t work. We don’t want any of them here. We don’t want the West Indians here. We don’t want the Indians here. We don’t want the Muslims here. We don’t want the jews here. We want a country for White Britons, just like everyone else has got. We want a country!”

And that’s what they’re scared of and when we were having big demos a few years ago outside migrant hotels, hundreds of people were turning up to hear me speak. And I was the only one that would get up in front of a big crowd and say:

“Look, do you want White people to be a minority in Britain?”

19 Tommy’s Poisonous Message Supports Mass Immigration Except for Muslims

top

And I’d give them the demographics on London and Birmingham and the rates at which people were coming in. And the establishment was scared. And then Tommy will come out, counter that. He’ll make threats about me. He has people threaten me online. Because his message is, it’s got nothing to do with being White. It’s about shared values. Muslims don’t embody these shared values. Well, that’s a poisonous message! Because I don’t care whether White Britons are replaced by Muslims or blacks or Indians. If White Britons are replaced, they’re replaced. And it’s the end of us! And it doesn’t matter how the end of us comes. If we’re not there, we’re not there! It’s about fighting for our survival. That’s what it’s all about.

And that’s why he is backed by the State. It’s why his YouTube account’s been reactivated. It’s why Musk is bigging up his X-account. Because his message ultimately calms the people but leads to the same eventuality, which is White erasure.

Blair Cottrell: Very well said. Well said! And thanks for joining us tonight, mate. Thanks, everybody. In the comments, comments are popping off. We’ve got a lot of live viewers. Any thoughts? Joel Davis?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I want to switch gears now because, yeah, I think we’ve discussed that.

Blair Cottrell: And just so you know, Joel’s. Joel’s been, like, harping on the last few days about this “Goon Right” concept. He can’t stop talking about the Goon Right.

And I’m not exactly sure what he means by it. So he’s going to start explaining This, I think this is the gear he’s shifting into him. All right, because it’s like he’s sitting there. He can’t wait.

Mark Collett: Come on, mate.

20 Joel on the “Goon Right”, Aka the “Horny Right”, or Pro-Sex Right

top

Joel Davis: I’ve been edging the whole stream. I’ve been edging the whole stream. No.

Well, so basically “Gooning” is like Zoomer speak for entering into some kind of trance like state through masturbatory excess. And it’s become somewhat of a meme that corresponds to just general horniness.

And so this notion of like the “Goon Right” has come to become somewhat of a meme on the fringe. It is going to gain in momentum in the coming months and years as a label. But the Goon Right is basically the horny Right. It’s basically a pro-sex Right.

Now this is interesting because for a very long time, a very long time period, I would say from at least from the 1960s onwards, at least up to the 20s and tens, early 20s and tens, the Left-Right distinction was generally characterized by the Left being supposedly on the side of sex, supposedly on the side of degeneracy and liberation, sexual liberation. It had the youth energy, it was what the cool kids were doing. And the Right were these stuffy Christian conservatives who were saying:

“No, you shouldn’t be having any fun and you should wait until marriage and you shouldn’t do drugs and you shouldn’t listen to rock and roll. That’s satanic, that’s evil!”

And there was this kind of dichotomy and this kind of youth rebellion against that paradigm, because obviously this Christian conservative ethos was previously the dominant moral paradigm in terms of how sexuality is regulated in the West.

However, obviously that’s completely outmoded because at this point in history, no one cares about those Christian conservative values, frankly. They’ve been, they’ve become an entirely fringe subset of society. Even the people who call themselves Christians or who go to church, they don’t really embody these values in any kind of traditional way, almost to a man, and a woman. And we live in a completely different paradigm where of dating apps and you know, live stream Internet pornography and so on, where sexual morality and this and the kind of sexual paradigm is completely changed.

Where now the dominant sexual morality is not Christian conservatism, now it’s feminism. Now the moralisers are on the Left and they’re telling you basically that:

“Well, don’t be too feminine because then you’re being too submissive to the male gaze. And this is Patriarchal, this is horrible! And for women to be liberated, they have to be less sexy. They have to wear a pants suit. And men aren’t allowed to express any kind of sexual vitality, otherwise they’re creepy, otherwise they’re rapists!”

And sex scandals are now about sexual assault more so than sexual exuberance, basically. And the Left has become increasingly unsexy.

There’s nothing less sexy than transgenderism. Transgenderism is basically the annihilation of sexuality. They call it a sexual identity, but really it’s a antisexual identity. Because sexuality is built on a polarity between the masculine and the feminine. When you annihilate that, you actually annihilate that difference. You also annihilate sexual energy itself. Which is why the people on the Left don’t seem like the kind of people to be having a lot of sex, or they don’t seem to be particularly sexy.

In fact, we’ve done the studies on this. The more attractive a woman is, the more Right-wing her political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact.

[44:12]

Also, the higher testosterone a male is, the more Right-wing his political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact. This has been reproduced in literature over and over again! And so women who are liked by men and men who have high testosterone, virility, this is essentially what the Right is made up of, on average. And the Left is increasingly made up of feminine men and masculine women. And what, that’s what feminism fundamentally is. It’s an androgynous ideology. It’s an ideology that femininity is submissive to the masculine and therefore as a result of that, it’s something to be ashamed of and that women should become more masculine and men should become more feminine, so that they can be put into a submissive position.

And so now the feminist moralisers that rule our society, this “gynocracy”, if you will, they want to make men jump through hoops for pussy, basically. You have to be a good little boy! You have to not step outside of the realms of their moral structures or whatever. Otherwise you have to be alienated. This is particularly the case in public life, political life the whole Me Too movement, etc.

And so increasingly, sex is Right-wing, particularly a kind of traditional sexuality of women trying to basically attune themselves to the male gaze and to male desires, whether it be Sydney Sweeney having huge tits and having great genes, as we’ve seen recently. This is fundamentally anti-woke and Right-wing coded because she’s got blonde hair and blue eyes and it’s an obvious wink, wink, nudge, nudge to the fact that she’s got Nordic genes. Not just blue jeans on.

But also we see at the same time what is the Right associated with things like pickup artistry, looks maxing, male sexual vitality in general and male sexual assertion, sovereignty. What is like the typical, like Right-wing memes for women. Things like the Trad wife. What is the Trad wife? The Trad wife is a woman who basically subordinates herself to the ideal of femininity as desired by a man rather than trying to be a feminist girl boss to impress other women.

And so when you think about it, the Alt-Right always was like a Gooner movement because it all began according to like the meme history with Gamergate. If people remember what Gamergate was, it was a movement in 1914, sorry, 2014, 2015 online, of people who were into video games, who were getting upset at how feminists had taken over video game journalism and were criticising every game for sexualizing women too much and demanding that video game developers make women’s tits smaller and more covered up. More realistic, they would say. More realistic depictions of women that don’t make women feel inadequate and don’t reinforce, you know, Patriarchal White supremacy or whatever.

And so basically they started making video games less hot, less fun, less sexy. And the nerds rose up, the gamers rose up, and created the anti-SJW, anti-woke movement that was basically the kindling of the Alt-Right. Then of course you have Donald Trump coming to power. Who is the Gooner in Chief?

Up until Donald Trump in Right-wing politics, sex scandals would kill your career. You would basically be done for. If you were on tape saying “you can grab her by the pussy”, when you’re famous, they’ll just let you do it. That famous line. But no, Trump not only grabbed her by the pussy, but he also grabbed the presidency against the feminist in a pantsuit.

And so it was the horny Gooner, Donald Trump who basically won and defeated the Wokes. Total woke obliteration. That was the kind of that was the vibe of the times.

And so in many ways you could see this kind of transvaluation of Right-wing moralism where Donald Trump would be asked about his thoughts on Christianity and he would say he was a Christian, but when they asked him about his actual beliefs, he would expose himself as not actually being a Christian. They asked him what his favourite part of The Bible was. And he famously said, “that’s personal”. And they said:

“Well, what do you like better, New Testament or Old Testament?”

And he said he likes both the same:

“They’re both excellent!”

What did he say?:

“I always say Art of the Deal, second best book of all time behind the Bible.”

So Donald Trump kind of exposed the fact that he wasn’t really a Christian. He was just saying that he was to get votes, he thought. And it was very blatant and obvious. It was very vulgar.

Now, of course, Donald Trump is a Zionist piece of shit and he’s a shill. But this was still an archetypal transvaluation of Right-wing politics, where the kind of stuffy conservative, you know, family man who has no sexual exuberance, that was completely marginalised. And instead have a new paradigm where the Right could be sexy and the Left, as I said, it used to be in the 60s and the 70s, supposedly this fun movement of like sex, drugs and rock and roll and like, just let people live, man! And then now it has become like this moral busy bodies that are trying to destroy everyone’s fun.

[49:23]

Of course, we had the MeToo movement, various other scandals, as I mentioned. And you can see it takes shape that essentially this is the new paradigm where it’s not about Christianity vs degeneracy, it’s about masculine virility, feminine sexuality, versus this androgynous feminist cult that is basically what the Left has become. These stuffy moralisers that want to impose political correctness and all of these moral regulations upon us. And so I think the Right needs to embrace this.

You know, one thing that I’ve always noticed whenever we do press conferences, is that the journalists from the ABC, which is a Left-wing institution that isn’t commercial, that’s publicly funded, that their reporters are always ugly women! Every single woman who works for the ABC is ugly! They don’t have one hot chick there. But the Channel 7 reporters are usually pretty cute.

Now, I’m not saying Channel 7 is Right-wing, but you can see this, like whenever there’s a Left-wing coded institution, basically ugly women rise up, take key positions of power, and then assert a radical Leftist ideology upon the rest of us. Because the reason why they don’t want a traditional sexual value system where women are basically graded upon how sexually attractive they are to the male sex, how much they please men, as opposed to being viewed through some other lens. Well, if you’re an ugly woman, if you’re an unattractive woman, that sounds horrible because you’re not going to be at the top of the chain!

So you can see them basically entering into an alliance, as I said, with low that beta male orbiter types who make up the conventional Leftists. And these people aren’t sexy, they aren’t full of vitality.

So I think the Right needs to embrace this rather than having this kind of traditionalist, you know, anti-sex attitude that many elements on the Right still have. I think we have to channel this. I think we have to embrace Goonerism, we have to embrace sex. We have to embrace the fact that the hot women are on our side. We have to embrace the fact that our kind of politics is sexy, that we are liberating. We are the liberators! It is the Left that are the moralisers now and we are the liberators of sexual energy. We are the youth movement! We’re the ones that are on the side of freedom, on the side of vitality. And I see that to be something that is really coming into focus.

And it’s also becoming quite relevant because there’s been quite a few sex scandals of late, let’s say, on the Right, on the far-Right even. There’s a recent case with Aarrvol, the leader of the Return to the Land project, which got a lot of headlines. And what I noticed was that basically he was exposed for essentially making pornography 10 years ago with his now ex-wife. That all got exposed.

And I think a few years ago, if that got exposed, a White nationalist leader being kind of shamed like that, the whole movement would have turned on him. They would have frowned on him, they would have basically made his position untenable. But what I saw was the opposite. Most people either just didn’t care or they rallied behind him and said:

“You know what? Everyone makes mistakes. Who cares? It’s not that bad. It wasn’t like you were race mixing or doing anything gay or whatever. Let the nigger live, you know, let him like he’s trying to do work for our people. Let him be human!”

And we’re seeing that more and more that the Right is becoming more sex-positive in that sense. And we’re becoming more and more impervious to sexual moralism, debilitating our side. And I think that’s a great thing!

Because there’s another huge story and Australian politics recently of Mark Latham. Mark Latham, you know, has recently basically been sticking it to the jews in New South Wales politics, calling out the jewish lobby, calling out how they’re pushing all of his Hate Speech laws, calling out the caravan hoax as a Mossad op. Speaking truth to power, holding the Premier of New South Wales and his staff, holding their feet to the fire for their complicity in, basically a Mossad hoax to take away our freedom. What happens? Immediately the media start attacking him because his ex-girlfriend was some OnlyFans slut, 30 years younger than him and he’s got all these embarrassing text messages where they have a BDSM relationship.

What did Mark Latham do? Just tripled down basically. And he just, he didn’t cuck! It’s been hilarious! He tripled down not just on the jews, [chuckling] but also on his like sex-positive attitude. Calling himself “the master” and so on in press conferences has been quite funny, and his tweets have been quite funny.

That is the energy that’s emerging now on the Right, where the Right are the ones that are having fun, the Right are the ones that are sexy. You know, many women have told me that they have gooned to NSN edits or NSN rally footage. I’ve seen these comments, I’ve seen the DMs. I don’t think anyone, I don’t think there’s women out there gooning to the Liberal Party videos. I don’t think there’s women out there getting to basically anyone in politics, any of their video hype edits except ours! We have a uniquely sexy kind of politics and I think we should embrace it.

So this is basically my introductory notion of the Goon Right. I think it’s something that needs to be debated, discussed because I think it’s very important that we harness and channel sexual energy to our ends, that we make racism sexy.

And if you think about it, racism and sex on a metaphysical level are basically the same thing. Both racism and sex are fundamentally means by which you perpetuate your own existence. They are the life force expressed through the psyche, through the body.

And so it kind of makes sense that like you know, a kind of post Christian life affirming Right would come to some kind of synthesis of a race based on and pro-sex, pro-masculine, pro-feminine concept. So I could see that as basically being the new paradigm that is kind of already here. It’s already been incepted.

But I think it needs a name and we need to meme it a little bit to make it conscious, because I think there’s still quite a few people that are maybe stuck in the old paradigm who need to be challenged and who need to be argued with and maybe they have some good points to make as well.

But yeah, I don’t think we want to be the incel Right. I don’t think we want to be the Trad Right where we’re just constantly morally policing ourselves and everybody else for having sexuality. I think that’s the complete wrong trajectory for us to take as a movement.

So anyway, I’ll put that to you guys. What do you think about that concept?

Blair Cottrell: You want to go first, Mark? I’ve got a few questions I want to ask Joel.

[56:10]

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ll go first. What you’re saying is. Sounds like Zoomer garbage.

At the end of the day, porn is a disgusting, vile poison foisted upon the Western world largely by jewish minds. They did this so that people lock themselves in the bedroom masturbating and don’t actually go out and meet real women. We need to smash all porn! It needs to be banned from the Internet. The purveyors of such need to be jailed or deported and all the filthy porn and madness OnlyFans, it needs to be shut down and genuine high level prosecutions for those who masterminded it all! It’s been nothing but destruction for young White men, has driven a wedge between men and women, prevented normal relationships from forming.

What we need to do is fundamentally get young men and young women back into traditional dating. Having sex, having White babies. That is what we need as a race. What we don’t need as a race is young White men sat consuming Internet filth, having their brains warped, getting sort of mild brain damage and then becoming gibbering, socially backward weirdos who can’t approach women. You get like that from watching too much porn, because porn has this effect on the brain which changes the way that you behave. There’s been numerous studies on this. I’ve made extensive videos on this.

And all of the things that have pushed this porn addiction, this addiction to masturbation, this addiction to increasingly depraved and degenerate acts, nearly all of them have been pushed by jews. So much so that when initial investigations into the porn industry in America took place, the people investigating the porn industry stated that it was nearly 100% jewish!

And in fact, jews who have written books and learnt essays on the porn industry boast that the porn industry was jewish. And it was motivated by an atavistic hatred of White Christian America that jews wish to dismantle because they wanted to break up healthy White society.

So I don’t really think, think that adopting sort of terminology and memes which are sort of associated with porn or glorifying porn in any manner is going to help us. And my message is clear, right? I’m a guy with a wife, two lovely White children. Don’t engage in any of this gooning or madness! Don’t go on OnlyFans! Don’t watch pornography! Go meet a woman, have babies. Do what you’re meant to do. Make sure your genetic line endures. That’s the biggest two fingers you can put up to the system.

Blair Cottrell: You immediately went to pornography, though, and I don’t remember Joel mentioning pornography specifically. What I’m understanding, Joel, is saying is that the Right, the Alt-Right, is becoming sexy and cool! It’s exciting, it’s interesting, it’s shocking to those who are attached to the system’s norms. And those people who are attached to the system’s norms, they’re the prudes now, Leftist system loyalists. They’re prudish! Feminists. They’re prudish! They’re the ones with all the rules. They’re uptight. Nothing’s allowed, that kind of stuff. Whereas the far-Right have a new rock and roll. Right?

So that was my understanding. And I’ve got a few questions to ask you, Joel, but before I do you have anything to say in response to that?

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, like, I didn’t really mention porn. I only mentioned in relation to the Arrval scandal. I don’t think we’re endorsing pornography here. But what we’re saying, though, is I don’t think we should be at the same time too morally harsh upon other people in the movement or our own people for being a little horny or going a little too far at times. You know, everyone’s human. We don’t live in a society where this kind of traditional, conservative sexual ideal is realistic or the way that people raised, or the kind of, we don’t have. Like, you don’t go outside and there’s a bunch of pristine virgins frolicking in sundresses in wheat fields that are ready to just marry you at the drop of a hat. That doesn’t exist, right? We live in a society where most people consume pornography. Most people have dating app accounts, most people have body counts. Most people do not have it all together in this domain.

[1:00:57]

And so if we try to hold up an ideal that’s completely unrealistic, and then morally police people and berate people for not embodying that ideal, I think we’re just going to come across as alienating to the vast majority of the population. Not that we should celebrate pornography or celebrate, you know, promiscuity, but at the same time, I think we could have a neutral attitude towards it where we stop trying to regulate, in particular, male sexuality. We stop trying to regulate sexuality as a political movement and instead try to channel it and use it to our ends.

You know, if there’s a girl who is going online with big titties and likes to get attention, but she’s also doing racist shit as well, if she’s also pushing our talking points or whatever, do we need to berate her for being a whore? Maybe it’s a good thing that all of the Gooners are basically having racism normalised through, like, watching her content or whatever.

So it’s like, at some point, I think we need to take a step back or, like should we be berating people for saying, Sydney Sweeney has a great rack? If a woman’s got a great rack, she’s got a great rack! I think we can just appreciate it for what it is. I don’t think we need to be the moral police here saying:

“No one is allowed to express any kind of sexuality. No one is allowed to have any kind of sexual history outside of monogamous marriage!”

And I think we could just live in reality, and I think we could embrace that reality, because, as I said now in the sexual marketplace, it isn’t this prudish, traditional morality which has any sway, has any power. It’s been basically defeated in our society.

What has power is feminism. What has power is women not wanting men to be able to have fun, not wanting women to do things to impress men, and not wanting men to be in control, to be dominant, to be assertive, to express any kind of virility. I think it’s far more pertinent that we position ourselves on the right side of this moral distinction rather than trying to morally grandstand about how horrible pornography is, I think, most people understand that pornography is bad. Like, consuming pornography all the time and jerking yourself off like crazy! The concept of gooning is a meme. Like, it’s not meant to be taken fully seriously. There’s an ironic component to it. We’re not saying, like, it’s based to, like log on to pornhub and just nut yourself crazy for hours and hours every night. But what we are saying is that maybe it’s not the worst thing if we’re on the side of sex against these, like prudish moralisers.

Mark Collett: I just want to address this. I’ve got to address this.

Firstly, we should be a movement of redemption. So if people have done crazy things and come to us and acknowledge what they’ve done’s crazy, we should accept them, allow them to put them behind them and move forward. But they shouldn’t be allowed to bring that filth into the movement.

Secondly, we should have high standards because we’re trying to be the best! We’re not just trying to be part of the goyslop madness that has destroyed our people. We’re trying to rise out of the swamp, rise out of the filth and present a better high ideal. It’s saying that because there’s high ideals, we shouldn’t have them.

Well, look at Blair. Blair’s an incredibly athletic man. Most men will never look like Blair. So does that mean we shouldn’t hold him up as an ideal of masculinity? Of course you do you hold up your best and you aim for that. But you know that a lot of people are going to fall short.

And finally, to say that we shouldn’t have shame, that we shouldn’t be shaming people, is absolute cucked nonsense! These whores who go on OnlyFans and sleep with a hundred, or a thousand different men in a day. Most of those men who are migrants, you see them queuing around the block, these people who just got off a small boat and they’re queuing up to have sex with a girl like Lily Phillips or Bonnie Blue. Those men are disgraceful scum! Those women are actually worse!

And if we had a proper society that shamed those women, they wouldn’t be doing it. But the sad thing is, when you normalise this, when you accept it, when you don’t shame it, young girls see those sluts as heroes and role models. I don’t want my daughter growing up in a world where OnlyFans whores, are seen as the role model, as the standard, as the ideal. I want my daughter growing up in a world where that kind of filth doesn’t exist and where those who would partake in it are shamed to such a degree that never show their face in society again. We’re not trying to take over the swamp! We’re trying to rise out of the swamp and create something better. And sure, many people are tainted by it and I am happy to take them by the hand, help them clean themselves off and help them towards a better future. But I don’t want them bringing any of the stinking, filthy disease swamp water with them when they come to us!

Blair Cottrell: I do think the point of life is often not to embrace your lower desires, but to try to rise above them. That’s how I’ve always tried to live personally.

But discussing this, as you called it, sexual transevaluation of Right-wing moralism. It’s an interesting topic. I think the old traditional Right-wing paradigm of sexual discipline was our paradigm for a reason. Right? And what about the traditionally Right-wing position that repression of the sex urge is a way of harnessing and focusing creative energy? Do you think that’s a thing or is that just a meme?

[1:06:32]

Joel Davis: Is that directed at me?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve got a few questions for you here and what I was asking you is like I’ve seen a lot of stuff from Right-wing influencers like Soul Bra, about, as I said, harnessing or repressing the sex urge in order to increase creative energy and channel that energy into something that’s more productive. Like do you think that sort of being more sex-positive or sexually liberated perhaps that could produce the opposite effects? It could be, as I said, a way of embracing your lower desire.

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, perhaps, but there’s also a point where you become over constrictive as well, where you over constrict yourself with morality to the point that it stifles creativity and it stifles like a movement. Like if we were to go around canceling, like for example, I agree with not canceling Aarvol because he did, you know, cringe pornography films 10 years ago. It’s not about, if he was doing it now, it’d be a different story. But 10 years, it’s like, who cares? Like at the end of the day I’m sure lots of people have done cringe things out there that hasn’t been exposed. But even let’s say that they haven’t, it is kind of out of the ordinary.

Okay, so what? Like he’s obviously sincere, he’s obviously trying to do the right thing now. So like, think we could forgive people? I think we could let go of this like hyper fixated moralism.

Of course we should have some sexual morality, but that sexual morality I think makes a lot more sense for the Right if it’s derived from a masculine dominant ideal where we have prohibitions against things like cuckoldry, prohibitions against homosexuality and so on. This is a affirmation of a kind of virile, normal sexuality as opposed to being anti-sex in general. I think a, like, Christian traditionalist morality, it almost views sex as like an evil, this like, perennial curse that we’re afflicted with in the human condition or something, and that it can’t be channeled or used for almost anything and it has to be basically sectioned off.

Blair Cottrell: Lust is evil, but I’m not sure if it views sex as evil because you said. Yeah, okay, but yeah, let me ask you this question. You said “racism is sex”, right? And I know what you’re getting at there because you’re talking about procreation and perpetuating your existence into the future through procreation, which is sex. But that’s a specific type of sex, right? That’s focused sex with a purpose. That’s not just loose sex, which is going to produce bastard children. That’s not lust after the flesh. That’s not just having fun.xRock and roll. Let’s just do whatever we want.

And so I think traditionally the Church was against that latter type of sex, whereas it would probably encourage the first type of sex because it would encourage people to get married, become loyal to each other, and then have a family where the children aren’t just going to be abandoned and mistreated, usually. What do you think about that?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think again, like, marriage is a good ideal, but in this day and age, like, what marriage used to mean was essentially proprietorship over the woman. Marriage meant that that woman was your property, basically, in a very traditional sense, like even in like, pre-Christian.

Blair Cottrell: Time, responsibility rather than property. I would say she’s your responsibility.

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. But at this point, like, you basically get zero rights! Like, you marry a woman, you have, like, literally no rights whatsoever as a result of that marital contract. All you have is a series of obligations and open yourself up to basically being legally raped.

So it’s like, why should men just accept, okay, I need to basically put pussy on a pedestal and treat a woman with like a body count of like six. Like, as if she’s like a peasant virgin from, like the Middle Ages. Like, as if those laws and social norms still exist when they don’t. We live in a completely different social and moral paradigm. And you could say that that’s tragic. Yeah, it’s not ideal. Like maybe it was better in the past, but this is the world that we live in. We don’t live in the 13th century.

So as a result of that, I think we have to adapt morally and politically and culturally to reality. And a movement that can accept reality and can channel that reality towards positive ends is one that will win.

Now, I’m not saying obviously I support having big families and I support people being loyal to each other and raising your family together and so on, but you know, the old kind of moral ideal can’t be just reinforced through morality. Like I don’t think that you can just go up to sluts and say:

“Hey, Jesus wants you to stop being a whore, you should pray more!”

And that they’ll magically pray away all of their carnal desires.

Mark Collett: Joel, you’re a good looking guy. Blair’s a good looking guy.

And I’m not going to start talking about my sort of sexual conquests. But I can tell you this. Now if you want a woman to stop acting like a slut and if you want a woman to toe the line and behave in a manner that is acceptable, the one thing she needs is a strong man who doesn’t take her crap. Most of these women behave like this because men simp for them. The real problem is these, …

[1:12:04]

Blair Cottrell: What does that look? What does that look like in practice, Mark? A strong man who won’t take a crap! Does it look like, does it look like a hand? Is that what it looks like? [chuckling]

Mark Collett: I’ll tell [chuckling] you what it looks like. I often say this is one of my well known sayings. If you’ve and people will understand this, that had a pet dog. If you’re playing with a pet dog on the beach, the faster you chase that dog and the harder you run after it, the further the dog will run, the quicker the dog will run and the more it will go away from you. The minute you turn your back on the dog and start walking towards the car, it’s licking your heels and begging for attention. Too many men spend their time simping for women, telling them what women here trying to be the “perfect gentleman”. When actually women respond much better to strength, power, masculinity and a guy that is not hanging on their every word and bigging up their ego.

And that’s why Donald Trump said what he said about grabbing women’s genitals, because he knew that as a strong man, if he walked up to them and grabbed them, they would just melt, because he was a powerful man who wasn’t going to take their crap. Where are these simply guys who are texting, … And you see these collections online of simpy guys sending a woman a hundred messages and she hasn’t replied once. She doesn’t want that! She doesn’t want that. What she wants is a guy who goes to the gym, who isn’t addicted to porn, who’s confident, who dresses well, who looks after himself. And when she says:

“How high you’re gonna jump? !”

He says:

“I’m not jumping for you, love. If you want to please me, but you show me how you’re gonna please me, you know, I’ll be there for you if you give something nice to me, but I’m not simping for you!”

That is what, …

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that.

Mark Collett: And that brings women into line.

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that what I’m saying is that for the sexual polarity to be properly instantiated, the terms have to be set from the masculine, not the feminine end.

So we shouldn’t be basically subordinating ourselves to this ideal of basically you’ve got to love and respect women so much, and viewing them as sexual objects or whatever is so so immoral and horrible. This is kind of like the feminist ideal.

The masculine ideal would have to be not putting pussy on a pedestal, putting your own direction in life first and foremost, and demanding that women submit and subject themselves to your career objectives, etc.

Blair Cottrell: Women will prefer it. Well, girls will prefer. Women will prefer. If you, as a man, do what Joel was just suggesting then. They find that more attractive than a man who is falling over himself to try to please and impress them. They’ll usually choose the guy who doesn’t have time for them because he’s too busy with ambitions, personal pursuits.

And that’s the thing. You go to the gym and you look after yourself. You do well in life not to impress women. You do it because you want to. And then women will be impressed by that naturally, you don’t do anything, …

Joel Davis: Women should be the ones trying to impress us! This is kind of, I believe, in a sexual phenomenology where, like, feminism in many ways is like the illusion of the feminine subject.

This idea that there’s this thing called the “feminine subject” that has all of these desires and inclinations that need to somehow be assuaged. But I don’t think it really exists in sexuality. I think the feminine properly understood in a kind of Platonic sense sexually is the object and the masculine is the subject.

And so people say, “happy wife, happy life”. I think this is bullshit! I think it’s actually the reverse. I think insofar as a woman is making her man happy, insofar as a woman is subjecting herself to a man and trying to seek his validation, ultimately that’s where her happiness will be derived from, because that is actually feminine! Feminine is submissive. The feminine is the second sex. The masculine is primary. The masculine is the active first principle.

And so as a result, when you see like what is Sydney Sweeney’s great crime against feminism and like wokeness and so on? Her great crime is that she presents herself in a way to impress men. She makes herself the object. And you could say:

“Well you shouldn’t be gooning over some random woman. You don’t know Sydney Sweeney.”

And I agree with it. But you can nevertheless appreciate that she is a woman that appreciates, presents herself in a feminine way. It’s a feminine object ideal as opposed to the kind of sexual morality that is generally preached by the establishment at this point, which is that the man has to check all these different boxes to keep a woman happy.

And so that’s kind of what I’m getting at with this like, Goon Right idea, like in exploring it is that that’s basically what this is about reversing the polarity, the kind of the feminine is expected to subject herself to the male gaze and is celebrated for doing. So and that is in contradistinction with the feminist pantsuit ideal, the girl boss ideal, which is basically the archetype of the HR bureaucrat or the modern contemporary politician.

[1:17:42]

Mark Collett: I’ve got one rebuttal to that. I’ve got a rebuttal to that. And my rebuttal is this. And it’ll be very quick so Blair can speak. We should also do more debates like this, Joel. People seem to like this kind of content. This is definitely going to get clipped out.

But look, feminists aren’t prudes. Feminists promote two or three archetypes of a woman. They do promote the girl boss. They do promote the fat, disgusting, stinking pig beast with loads of tattoos, pink hair and those disgusting ear stretchers. But they also promote slutty OnlyFans, debauched madness!

The one thing that the feminist doesn’t promote, there is a sector that the feminist doesn’t promote, and that’s traditional European beauty.

So the reason they were annoyed about Sydney Sweeney in the denim outfit is because she didn’t look like a fat, ugly cow beast. She didn’t look like a girl boss. And she wasn’t dressed in a scandalous manner. She didn’t look like a cheap prostitute. She actually looked quite traditionally beautiful. Like, if you look at European women from the Middle Ages, they used to wear big dresses, but they used to have their breasts pushed up with corsets. They used to have a curvy hourglass figure. They would show themselves off.

If you look at Greco-Roman architecture, the female figure was always shown off, but it was done so in a beautiful way. It wasn’t a ham beast. It wasn’t a debauched whore covered in tattoos and piercings and pink hair. And it wasn’t a bossy, cowy, snotty nosed bint that you wouldn’t want to spend five minutes with. There is one sector that feminists take, one section of sort of female society that feminists take, and that is traditional beauty.

And when I saw the Sydney Sweeney advert, I thought:

“Gosh, that looks like a beautiful woman from the 70s or 80s!”

And they hate that because she didn’t look like a slag. If you saw her walking down the street like that, you’d be like:

“Oh, she’s beautiful, she looks nice!”

You wouldn’t be:

“She’s a slapper, she’s mental, she’s a ham beast!”

You know, to a feminist, you can be anything, but the one thing you can’t be is traditionally beautiful.

And I think that’s where you’re missing the point.

And for me, if you said, should the Right-wing be sexy in that way, Damn, yeah, we should! If we’ve got a beautiful woman and she’s dressing like that, not like a whore, but dressing nicely, we will. Yeah, she’s beautiful. We should be presenting that. We should be presenting traditional, archetypical European beauty. Because that is the one thing that is the antithesis of the feminist!

Blair Cottrell: And the minority of amplified feminists who are so often in government positions these days, these are the only sorts of people who would get frustrated or angry by women like Sydney Sweeney looking beautiful. Because this minority of feminists, these government bureaucrats, these boss women, the dictators of the gynocracy, their whole existence is like a protest against traditional feminine beauty, because they don’t feel beautiful! They don’t want any women to be able to feel beautiful. They want to annihilate the standard concept of female beauty and replace it with something that is ugly. So they can feel like they’re normal.

When someone’s got a problem, when someone’s basically deranged, they become like the personification of disease, where they want to spread and make everything else as deranged as possible. So then they feel normal, they don’t feel so deranged anymore. That’s really the only kinds of people who would be upset about female beauty, like what is expressed through Sydney Sweeney. That which is expressed through Sydney Sweeney, I should say. But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you said that, …

Joel Davis: I want to jump in here quickly though. I want to jump in quickly on what he said. Yeah, because what he was basically saying like I’m not saying that we should celebrate women wearing like no clothes and like just tits and arse out. Like you go down to the shops these days, I’m sure it’s the same in Britain. And every single woman is wearing these, who’s like a young attractive woman is wearing these tight fitting yoga pants.

And it’s like you’re just bombarded with like asses in every direction. That’s like, how did this? It wasn’t like this when I was a kid. It’s out of control! I’m not saying that this is a good thing.

What I am saying is that it’s about the relationship between the masculine, the feminine. The male gaze. What you’re expressing is actually men actually like modesty. The reason why women are all dressing with their arse out like that is because they’re copying other women. It’s not even a masculine ideal. Men don’t like women wearing activewear everywhere all the time. I’ve never heard it, …

Blair Cottrell: Men do look at that. And so they’re, …

Joel Davis: Men do look at it. But like I never heard a man say like, damn, …

Blair Cottrell: Women wouldn’t dress that way if they didn’t feel like they were being rewarded with attention for it. Correct?

Joel Davis: You know what? A man would really get attention if she wore a fkh dress! If she dressed like a woman used to. If she wore like vd

Blair Cottrell: You’d get better quality of attention. Yeah, but as you said, women are copying other women because, …

Joel Davis: Women never wear dresses anymore because they have to signal to the other women that they also drink the same pumpkin spice lattes or matcha or whatever the fuck they’re drinking these days. And they also, …

Blair Cottrell: Let me ask you this, if you saw two women, …

Joel Davis: They’re conforming to the feminine gaze, actually.

[1:23:08]

Blair Cottrell: If you saw two women is a scenario for you? One was wearing the seemingly painted on mini gym shorts with no underwear underneath. And she was walking around like that. And then the other woman was wearing like a traditional dress which covered most of her body.

Which woman would you look at first and which one would you pay more attention to? For most men, they would look at the girl in the mini shorts. That’s the girl that wins over the girl in traditional dress. That’s why women dress in the mini shorts. And it wasn’t acceptable. We didn’t allow women to dress in the mini shorts back in the day. It’s only a recent phenomena that men have become, or society has conditioned men into becoming so weak and quiet that we won’t speak up and say anything about it.

And so that’s the problem, right? It just keeps, it just gets more and more out of control, doesn’t it? Women will keep pushing boundaries until they’re literally walking around in painted on clothes.

And I did say that, I think I said this on a stream like a year ago. I think the next stage of female fashion will be painted on crop tops. Like they’ll just actually start painting clothes on because like there’s not really a way they can start wearing less than they’re currently wearing without just literally airbrushing clothes on. That’ll be the next example of female fashion! It’ll start in the gyms probably, or maybe somewhere else.

But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you this because I think this will be handy for the young guys. The young guys should benefit from the answer to this question. You said that women like strength, right? But what is your definition of strength? What does strength look like in a man?

Mark Collett: Strength isn’t just physical, it’s a state of mind. And it means not bending. And without being rude about women, women have this mentality where they will push and push and push. And when a man breaks and gives them everything that they want, that isn’t actually what they want, which is the irony. What they want is a man who is going to be strong. That means standing up to them. It means holding a line, it means not eternally giving into them. And it means almost being like a stern father figure.

And I think part of this, if you look at way marriage used to take place, a father used to give away his daughter to her future husband, and it was almost as if the father was passing the daughter into the care of another man who would then take on that role of being the strength, the carerr, in many ways a disciplinarian. And that doesn’t mean you have to be harsh to women. It certainly doesn’t mean you have to beat them or hurt them. But what it does mean is that women have a more impulsive, more compassionate nature that can get them into trouble.

And the man is the counterfoil to that. The man is the one that provides the strength, the discipline, the ability to say no, which is very important. And when you take that strength away and you present a woman with a weak man, she’ll run roughshod over him, eventually chew him up, spit him out, leave him heartbroken and often damage herself in the process.

And a way, I’ll express this as a way that proves this in real life. You often get these very attractive sort of Hollywood feminists who give these long sort of TEDx talks about what a man should be and that he should be:

“Caring and kind and compassionate and help her with everything and listen and not be pushy and let her have the bed when she’s tired and he should sleep on the floor!”

And they never go out with that man! They never go out with him. They end up dating some, like Chad, 6 foot 7, rugby captain with muscles on his muscles, who obviously chucks around the bedroom, pins her down by the throat and makes her absolutely sort of melt every time he opens his mouth or lays his hand on her! Because no woman really wants that weak, pathetic, simping dork! They say they do, but they want the opposite. And that’s the conundrum of the woman. Women are hard to fathom, but fundamentally they want that guy who is going to be a blockade to their own worst instincts.

Blair Cottrell: You’ve got it figured out!

And if you haven’t tried this, you got a girlfriend, you got a wife, and you’re having problems with her. If you haven’t tried saying no, give it a go. Try:

“No, you’re not wearing that out. I’m not going out with you in that. Change your top, or no, you’re not going to that club tonight with your friends. You’re staying here with me. No!”

Try saying no and you might get some if she’s not used to it, you might get some pushback in the moment, but I guarantee you in most circumstances she will respect you more and come to like you more. She’ll become weak at the knees if you just create some boundaries and you don’t compromise on those boundaries. You don’t need to be mean or cruel like when you say no, it has to be coming from a place of care, a place of respect for her and yourself.

Because as you said, Mark, women do have a tendency to push. They want to push boundaries until they get away with what they never should have even been thinking about in the first place. Right. So we often exist to tell women no. That’s basically one of the primary roles of a man in any family relationship situation. We exist to say no, to create boundaries. Pretty simple stuff. Right.

[1:28:41]

Joel Davis: I’m just glad that Mark ended up completing his argument against the Goon Right with a really goonish rant, fantasizing about some 6 foot 7 rugby player just going to town. I think Mark is a gooner! I think he just too. He’s too Boomer. He’s too unk to realise the ironic connotation of the label. But that’s okay.

Yeah, it was good. It was a good discussion. I think it was kind of fun. That’s what I wanted it to be, fun. I wanted it.

Actually. It’s good that Mark came on. It’s a shame [Thomas] Sewell isn’t on because I think Sewell probably would have had hilarious reactions to this as well. But we can keep discussing this subject. The Goon Right is going nowhere. The Goon Right is coming back in a big way or it’s emerging in a big way. I see the trends going in that direction, and yeah, …

But again, I got to mention this again. White Australia.org if you’re in Australia, you want to come to our conference this weekend. It’s going to be spectacular! Sign up as a supporter and then you can get vetted and you can come to the conference Saturday and Sunday, this weekend. If you’re in Melbourne, come check it out. But you have to get vetted. We’re not just gonna let random people show up. We have to keep the event secured. So now’s your last chance to go through the process.

But yeah, I think basically. Yeah, I think basically we’re good for this portion of the show. We could get into like some Superchats or something.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s been a good show.

Mark Collett: Just to jump in here. I’ve got a show in America with Jared Taylor that starts in about 15 minutes. So I’m gonna have to duck out then. But if we’ve done most of the discussions, if there are any Superchats for me, I’d happily answer them first so people don’t feel short-changed.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll have a look. So Dingo Nationalist. This is addressed to you, Mark. He said:

“Mark. Have you heard any indication from any experts or lawyers whether you’ll have a reasonable chance of overturning your 15 year ban from Europe?”

Mark Collett: Yeah, I have. I’ve heard from a lawyer in Sweden who is attached to the nationalist cause. That is the one that’s going to be putting in my appeal. He’s got all my statement of fact now. I’ll be chasing that up later because I want to get it in well before the 21 day deadline. He thinks we’ve got a very good case because my statement of fact is extremely strong. You know, having there is precedent for me going to Europe, there is no precedent for me ever causing disorder and I have no criminal record. So there is no legal basis to ban me. This was a political decision.

However, despite the being a strong legal case, this isn’t the sort of thing that’s heard in court. This is the kind of thing that is heard by a secret panel of political overseers in some office in the European Union, which gives me a lesser chance of success. I’m sure if it went before a proper court, people would be outraged! I’m sure if you told the average Swede:

“Look, we basically let in every non-White who washes up on our shores, roll out the red carpet for them and let you know, sexually assault our daughters. But this White guy who’s against all that and has got no criminal record, we’re not letting him in.”

I’m sure most people will be appalled, but unfortunately that isn’t how it works.

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough. Well, I guess let us know how it goes when you go through that process. I’m sure a lot of us would like to know. And you should let The Noticer news know as well because they could cover it because you’re probably not gonna get good coverage in the UK.

Mark Collett: Yeah, they’re great! They wrote an article on me. They’re really friendly. And obviously, look, I really support you guys and love you guys and if people watching now want to show me some support, the best way to do it is to sub me on Rumble. So you’re watching on Rumble. If you want to sub me on Rumble, I’ve got a Rumble channel myself. If you can all hop over there and give it a like, or a sub or whatever it is, that would be appreciated. It doesn’t cost you anything, but just subscribe. Joel’s got a few thousand more followers than me, so if some of them could pop over and sub me, that would be much appreciated.

Joel Davis: This will link to Mark’s Telegram in the description. You can follow Mark on Telegram if you don’t already.

Mark Collett: Yeah, follow me on Telegram but also jump over on Rumble. I’m trying to build my Rumble up. You can also follow me on Odysee and Gab as well.

Joel Davis: This question is also for you, Mark. It’s from Aussie Autist 88. He said:

“Hey, Mark, how much better is the Aussie flag than the British flag?”

Mark Collett: I don’t know. I think they’re both good flags.

I mean, I’m just checking the I mean, I suppose the Australia flag, you could probably say. You could either go one or two ways. You could either say:

“Look, the Australian flag is better because it’s the British flag plus like some little stars.”

So you could say like:

“Yeah, it builds upon the British flag.”

Or you could say:

“It’s less good because it kind of takes perfection and tries to improve on it and just add some stars.”

Blair Cottrell: Is that the most diplomatic answer to that question that could have possibly been!

Joel Davis: Just say the fucking Union Jack is better! You fucking pussy!

[1:33:41]

Blair Cottrell: What he really thinks, guys, this British supremacist, he thinks that the shitty Australian flag is just some crappy offshoot of its parent creator, the Union Jack, the original Union Jack, you know. Come on, mate, let’s just be honest!

Mark Collett: Well, [chuckling] I like to please, I like to please everyone. This is why it’s so shocking that I’m banned from Sweden!

Blair Cottrell: The British flag is like Judaism and the Australian flag is like Christianity. It’s like:

“Hey, we’re the parent religion. The only reason you exist is we’re, …”

Mark Collett: Definitely not like Judaism. And that’s the one thing [chuckling] we’ll never, …

Joel Davis: Blair, really opening up like cans of worms with this. We’re just gonna leave it now.

Blair Cottrell: We’re not doing a religious discussion.

Joel Davis: We’re not going to go there.

Blair Cottrell: We’re ruling that out right now.

Joel Davis: Not gonna go there!

Also, I just want to say hail to all my goon patriots who goon swarmed the Avi Yemeni vs John Roddick debate yesterday with debate Joel Davis in the live chats on X and on YouTube. The spam was crazy! There were points during the stream where there was literally no comment section other than people spamming debate Joel Davis to Avi Yemeni. It was quite funny.

Blair Cottrell: How did he respond to that? Did he still just ignore it?

Joel Davis: He ignored it. I saw Rookshan’s pajeet face like freaking out because he was obviously Manning the live chat while the stream was going on. And yeah, it was quite good. Avi still running from the debate. I’m hoping that we can eventually set it up. I think me versus Avi Yemeni. That debate will break the Internet. I think that that will go insane! That’ll be probably the biggest Australian political debate in years. It will go viral. It’ll get nasty. It needs a moderator because Avi can’t shut the fuck up because he’s just yaps his little yid mouth! In that debate yesterday against John Ruddick, who didn’t do that well, by the way, but John Ruddick couldn’t finish a point without Avi just cutting in with more bullshit!

Blair Cottrell: I’d love to moderate an Avi Yemeni debate with someone.

Joel Davis: I don’t think he would agree to you moderating it, but we could find maybe someone more neutral.

Mark Collett: He’ll never debate you, mate. Tommy won’t debate me. These people are fundamentally cowards! They know that what we say is right. So like with Tommy, I’ve repeatedly said he’s actually threatened to fight me all sorts. And like, he might beat me in a fight, he might be able to knock me out, he might be able to hurt me, but one thing he will never do is sit and talk with me. He does not fear anything where I can’t open my mouth.

He fears me opening my mouth in front of his fans, because he is an absolute multiculturalist. He’s pro-immigration and he supports the genocidal system state of Israel, which is flooding Europe with millions of Arabs. And he doesn’t want anyone to tell his fans that, because he is a foreign agent and he fears the Collett.

And I’m sure that Avi Yemini fears the Davis just as much as Robinson fears the Collett. You know, they can’t be held up to truth. And if Robinson agreed to debate me or Avi Yemini agreed to debate you, Ezra Levant would be in his DMs in seconds literally being like, …

Blair Cottrell: Don’t do it!

Mark Collett: Shut it down! Shut it!

Joel Davis: Stop black pilling, Mark. Stop black-pilling. He’s gonna debate me. It’s gonna happen.

Mark Collett: I’m making you look good. I’m making you look good. I’m saying you’re so above his level. It’d be like Neo in the Matrix fighting those agents. You’d just be sort of chopping them down without even thinking.

And that’s why they fear you. They know you cannot be defeated in a debate by him. In the same way that Tommy knows, you know, he would not have a hope in hell. It’d be like 10 minutes in and it would be an absolute drubbing. You know, you versus Yemeni, you’re like Tyson in his prime and he’s like a blubbing, you know, scrawny, six former. You’d knock him out!

Blair Cottrell: In such a way where if Avi could be made to believe or understand that he will come away from the interview or the debate, and regardless of how it goes, he’s going to appeal to all of those Israel fanatics. They’re all still going to love him. And it’s going to be very entertaining. You know, it could be good for his image, it could be good for his platform, something like that’s the way you’d have to spin it because that’s the only way he would actually go for it. I think there’s a very small chance, though. I don’t think he would do it.

Joel Davis: Someone else can spin it. Get to work. Spinners spin this. Someone sell it to Avi. I know I have friends who have his ear.

Blair Cottrell: You got to say things like:

“Avi, you’re the only one who’s like, smart enough. You’re the only one who has the passion to actually stand up to this Nazi. This is your moment. You know what I mean? We need you!”

That kind of stuff. Like, you gotta really build him up.

Joel Davis: It’s gonna get done. He’s not going to do it right now, but it’s going to get done. We are going to debate. It is inevitable. It’ll be an incredible, like an incredible display of kike rape! And I’m looking forward to it. It is inevitable. It will happen. Everyone must will it into existence. If we focus enough will psychically on it as an outcome and goon swarm his channel, his chat enough elevate the meme to a higher and higher status. Eventually he will capitulate. White Bitch triple six said:

“Hi, gentlemen. Just wanted to wish my buddy Neddie good luck at nationals. I wish I could be there in the flesh.”

Presume that he’s going to be in the White powerlifting event. Modern World Reject said:

“Hail sex and deport stinky!”

That’s kind of a strange Superchat, that one. He Man 1488 just Superchatted his own name. He then Superchatted again, saying:

“I’ve got Tom Sewell’s credit card, so I’m going to town. Blair, give us a bicep flex.”

[1:39:21]

Blair Cottrell: How am I going to do that. I’m wearing a long sleeve shirt. Should I do it? I don’t know.

Joel Davis: You got to get it done!

Blair Cottrell: The man paid $10.

Joel Davis: All right, a little more. $10. Hey, there we go!

Blair Cottrell: Thanks. That’s the best I can do, guys.

Joel Davis: Yeah, that was a pretty cringe Superchat.

But yeah, also people are saying, debate Chalky. He called me out for a debate. I didn’t even know who he was. I agreed to it. I responded to his email. He said he was going to line it up. And that’s it. That’s the last I heard about it.

So I don’t know what’s going on. I guess we’ll find out soon. Is he flaking? Is he delaying? Hopefully delaying. But I was looking forward to that because it’s just very hard to get people to engage me at all because they’re afraid of what might happen. But I’m not a mean guy. I just want to have a conversation. I want to just debate ideas. I don’t know this guy from a bar of soap. I got nothing personal against him.

So, yeah, Chalky, just. Let’s line it up. I think he wants to do it on Joel Jamal’s show or something. Let’s line it up. Got some Entropy Superchats from Annabel Anna Bola Cost, who said:

“Hey, Joel, what’s the estimated timeline in regards to the White Australia party? Keep up the good work.”

Well, the estimated timeline is summertime launch, vaguely, estimated, but nothing’s in stone. Sign up White Australia.org help us get there, but we’re looking good! The numbers are, I don’t think are going to be an issue, but we need to go past the minimum number. You know, you need 1500 signatures to register a political party in Australia. But if we have only 1500 there’s games they could play to try and knock some of those signatures out. So what we need is to get well past that number so we give ourselves some breathing room. So we need as many signups as possible. We need as many members as possible.

So White Australia.org sign up! Help us out. Chevy Morgan said:

“G’day, Joel. I would like to debate you. I would be considered far-Right, however, believe Christian methods are more practical in nationalism. I’m an ex-Lefty as well. I have a small channel on TikTok with 1700 followers with based content. Chevy the Human.”

Well, I don’t go on TikTok.

So you’re gonna have to find a way to talk to me on a different platform because I’m not going to be able to talk to you on TikTok.

What else have we got here? It’s just like people not actually saying anything, just sending money, which I do appreciate.

Blair Cottrell: We just got a $1 Superchat back on Rumble from He Man as well, but I don’t think that’s up to you.

Joel Davis: Give us a flex. Well, I got a jacket on so like what am I gonna have to take my jacket off? Take it off. Gonna have to mog out here right now. Wait, here we go. I’ll give. I’ll give you this on. There we go.

Blair Cottrell: Very nice. That’s one.

And while you were doing that, Mike and Nolzy sent through a 10 Superchat. Thanks very much, mate. He said:

“Good to see you again. Mark, Nolzy from the Racer crew.”

Mark Collett: Thank you. Oh, no!

Blair Cottrell: The next Superchat is:

“Give us a flex, Mark!”

Mark’s gonna do it now. That’s good. That’s impressive. Hey, I like that. He’s got some. He’s got some peak.

Joel Davis: Well, he’s got like whole technique out here.

Mark Collett: Not bad for an old man. Somebody in the chat kept calling me Unk. Not bad for an old man, hey chat?

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the thing. My cope on biceps is I never work out biceps pretty much at all because if you get your biceps too big it actually really impairs your striking.

Blair Cottrell: So here’s the intellectual explanation and slash cope for why Joel had the smaller biceps, at least in this tonight.

Joel Davis: I also do not inject anabolic steroids and as well. But yeah. Ingo nationalist said:

“Joel, do you believe morality is objective or subjective?”

What kind of, I mean this is such a silly question.

Blair Cottrell: Subjective, isn’t it?

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. Different aspects of it are objective, different aspects of subjective.

Michael Goldberg 123 said:

“Debate Paul Golding.”

Blair Cottrell: Paul Golding? Do you have much of a relationship with him?

[1:44:11]

Mark Collett: Well, I get on with Paul so there’s not really much to debate, and Paul has more or less taken on every position that I have pushed. They’re now for deportations, for re-migration, they don’t allow Israel flags at their demonstrations, they’ve banned them! So I mean I’ve got quite a bit of synergy. It’d be more of a conversation. I mean Britain First as a group have pretty much adopted most of the stuff that we talk about.

I mean at one time I’d say he’d have had more synergy with Tommy Robinson but now he has more synergy with the ethno-nationalist Right because they’re doing marches for re-migration and as I said, they aren’t shilling for Israel. In fact they’ve banned Israeli flags at demonstrations which is what we want to see. There’s nothing worse than going to a nationalist demo and seeing a load of bloody Israeli flags. I mean that is the sign of a controlled opposition event.

Joel Davis: Well it’s good to see the Overton Window shift. And you know what we’re noticing in Australia as well is that the Israel shilling is taking a nose dive on the Australian right.

Obviously the controlled major parties, One Nation, Liberal, National, they still shill for Israel like crazy! But outside of that everyone’s turning on Israel, everyone’s turning on the jewish lobby in Australia very quickly and that was something that was unheard of basically only a couple years ago really.

So it’s great to see, great development to see, you know, an anti-zionist Right, a patriot anti-zionist position where you know my position, as I’ve said many times before, I’m not pro-Palestine but I’m anti-Israel. Like I’m not anti-Palestine, I’m just neutral on Palestine, but I’m anti, I’m anti-Israel. Palestine doesn’t do anything to me, Israel does! Israel completely has completely obliterated free speech in our country with literal massage psyops and the coordination of the diaspora lobby to attack our freedom of speech and try to put people like me in jail.

So why the fuck, why the fuck would I not be anti-Israel?

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty concerning how much influence they have in Australia though, despite Israel not being very popular amongst the masses. Like the influence the jewish lobby clearly has over politics, police. It is still very concerning.

Joel Davis: It is, it is! But what we’re seeing is the beginning of a patriot anti-zionist Right.

And obviously the Left, the Left aren’t huge fans of Israel. Even though the centre Left parties can still be captured by Israel linked Zionist linked power networks to control their policies somewhat.

But you know Israel has never been this unpopular, and it’s only becoming increasingly less and less popular, and particularly with young people as well young people from on the Left and the Right, for different reasons, agree on basically only one thing which is the “Fuck Israel” position. So it’s a beautiful thing.

Sean McKenzie said:

“All my moggers Nazis!”

And he also said:

“Debate Avi stop being a pussy!”

I’m trying to debate Avi! He’s the one being a pussy.

Blair Cottrell: I think there’s this in-joke in the chat where everyone’s pretending like you’re scared of him. That’s been going on for a while.

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. That’s kind of funny, I guess. Oh, yeah, He Man 1488 said:

“White pride world-wide. In the end, we win.”

Just want to point out that he man 1488 keeps sending $1 Superchats, the minimum Superchat and just spamming Superchats. This is what I like to call a cheap cunt! You know, he wants to have a lot to say, but he doesn’t want to pay too much for it. Gonna shame him for that. Pay up bitch! You know, we’ll still read them out, but like have some honour, have some pride, send me some fucking cash.

But anyway, that’s the end of the show. I think we. I think Mark has to go. Blair and I, we’ve got a lot to do. Big weekend coming up. We gotta compete in the White powerlifting competition and we got to give speeches. We got people coming from all around Australia that we’re hosting down here in Melbourne. It’s going to be a huge festival of racism this weekend. And yeah, should be quite interesting to see how it plays out.

Blair Cottrell: But thanks for joining us, guys and thanks, Mark. Thanks for your time. We just had one more Superchat from White Bitch triple six who says:

“Here’s some more sugar for the lads.”

Well, thanks very much.

Joel Davis: That goes pretty hard. Oh, Hail Yay also said:

“Drew Pavlou said he’s worried about debating you again because his family got doxed last time. He said he would be down to do it if he had a no dox guarantee.”

I didn’t dox his fucking family. I don’t know why he keeps pushing this line, but yeah, of course I’m not going to dox your family, Drew. I don’t have any interest in doxing your family. I do have an interest, however, in streaming with you. Even it could be a debate or it could be a friendly stream, because I just like the guy, but whatever he’s down for, I’m down for. I’m a slut for Drew Pavlou content.

But that’s basically the end of the show. Thanks, Mark, for coming on.

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! I’m gonna dash now, guys. Can I jump on this other show? But thank you for your time. It’s always been a pleasure. Enjoyed the debate, enjoyed the banter, enjoy the flex and look forward to working with you guys again soon. I really am looking forward to White Australia becoming a party and seeing how you do. So good luck with your future in endeavours and no doubt we’ll all stream again soon. Thank you so much!

Joel Davis: Yeah. Thanks, mate. White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour!

[1:49:53]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/7/2025 = 28)

ThigASteach
Supporter
10 hours ago
595 watching and 70 likes!! Come on folks. These good lads could use some more support. Tis little enough to hit a thumbs up! #PeaceAndRespect #GodBless
8 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
8 hours ago
That’s insane that he can’t even go on holiday in Europe anymore, life-wrecking stuff.
5 likes

Report
PaleDissident
9 hours ago
great stream
4 likes

Report
Ruminoid
10 hours ago
Women (or men for that matter) havent conspired to be where we’re at. When are you going to speak about corrupt Jewish satanic influence and influencers of music and Hollywood.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
You crypto jews never stop talking about yourselves. I wish you guys would stfu about your religion and your preferred boogeyman. ”da world would be a utopia if there were no jooos” derp.. fucktards.. stupid fucks.. halfwits..
0 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
when do we get the Jew fatigue? Never? I don’t know about your little shitholes but America has over hundred million nonwhites that people stop talking about because they are too busy talking about the Jews over everything else. They say black fatigue is when you get tired of mentioning black people. Well why the fuck haven’t people grown tired of Israel, the Jews, and Satan? Some bullshit.
0 likes

Report
EinZweiDrei
4 hours ago
Joel was a bit off base on the sexual energy thing imo. Our “vitality” should come from being physically fit and having Christian ethics.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EinZweiDrei
3 hours ago
Sorry to Joel if I’m interpreting him incorrectly. Great stream btw.
0 likes

Report
JQRC
Supporter+
9 hours ago
This was the wrong stream to debut the Gooner Right. This is a serious matter but should have made the point we are the youthful cool movement. Mark basically is the moralizing stuffy nice guy that says we dont have fun over here. Good luck with your Boomers, cause the Gooners are taking over!
2 likes

Report
ReclaimMan
5 hours ago
Mark’s ex-gf is a cutie, glad I got to see that
2 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
3 hours ago
Take a holiday in St. Petersburg. The Venice of Russia.
2 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
5 hours ago
Sounds like Joel is just rationalizing his own private escapades.
1 like

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
4 hours ago
the world is run by criminally insane megalomaniac perverts…something’s going to give eventually…
1 like

Report
Stopwhitegenocide1488
2 hours ago
Joel looks like a hasidic Jew with that hairstyle.
1 like

Report
Restlessdreams88
44 minutes ago
rap music is fucking gay
1 like

Report
katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – Another Week of Political Drama – Jul 27, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/08/03/joel-davis-another-week-of-political-drama-jul-27-2025-transcript/ In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the political drama concerning Blair and Tom and the alleged Nazi salute; and other topics.
0 likes

Delete
Neqis
7 hours ago
Such a short episode :((
0 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
6 hours ago
Keith Woods is definitely on the powder
0 likes

Report
PureWhitey
5 hours ago
Mark must have been gaming on his phone when Joel was making his point because he missed it completely.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
The “Lookmaxer” guy Nick spoke to recently was incredibly feminine, basically a f6ggot.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
Wait, we’re now pro-watching Jew porn and wasting our lives in the process? What’s going on? :S
0 likes

Report
david43
2 hours ago
these stories almost sound unbelievable if I haven’t been following these situations.. are there no good police officers that can speak up, in America there not supposed to follow unconstitutional orders but even here there are barely any good men… Such a crazy story if this guy is telling the truth….
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 hour ago
Why would you use the word goon if you weren’t referring to porn?
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
1 hour ago
Joel has a point in the sense that sexuality is good but I would say that sexuality must be divided into Eugenic Sexuality vs Dysgenic Sexuality. The Monkish asexual mindset is dysgenic.
0 likes

Report
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
Would it be accurate to say that women these days sometimes need a light spanking on the bum…
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
…never in anger of course.
0 likes

Report
GustavusVasa
Supporter+
1 hour ago
Gooniest episode ever Mark was on tonight
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
10 hours ago
assuaged is pronounced uh-swayjd, not uh-sawjd
-2 likes

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 19883

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4: Mon, Aug 11, 2025 — Table of Contents (up to 20 entries).

Version 3: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 — Table of Contents (up to 10 entries) started.

Version 2: Fri, Aug 8, 2025 — Transcript now completed = 110/110 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Thu, Aug 7, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 32/110 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Rumble comments (28).

Ernst Zundel – 1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics 1 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 02 May 2025 11:30:58 +0000

Ernst Zundel

1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal

Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics – 1

Sat, Jul 15, 1967

[The transcript is part of a 1967-68 radio show in Montreal featuring Ernst Zundel discussing Israel and Jewish topics.

Zundel says he got “a really good public hearing” on these controversial topics.

He says there was pressure on the radio station from jewish groups over his appearances.

Zundel criticises the argumentation tactics of jewish callers, saying they use “constant interruption, constant deflection manoeuvres, constant ridiculing.”

A jewish caller accuses Zundel of being “a German pro-Nazi.”

Zundel defends himself, saying he was only 6 years old when WWII ended.

There is debate over German reparations payments to Israel and jewish individuals.

Zundel cites figures from the German consulate about reparations payments.

A jewish caller challenges Zundel’s figures and sources.

There is discussion of German scientists working for Arab countries after WWII. (25:00)

The bombing of Dresden is brought up as a counterpoint.

Zundel suggests Israel should pay reparations to Palestinian refugees.

The caller argues this is impractical and wouldn’t lead to peace.

There is debate over Israeli retaliation for terrorist attacks.

The caller accuses Zundel:

“I haven’t heard you say a good thing about the Israelis.”

The origins of Ashkenazi jews are debated, with Zundel citing the “Khazar theory.”

The caller strongly disputes this theory:

“What are you talking about?”

Throughout, there are heated exchanges and accusations of bias on both sides.

The host tries to moderate and says “There are three sides to this story. There’s the Israeli side, the Arab side and the truth!”

Zundel frequently cites statistics and historical claims that are challenged by the callers.

There are repeated arguments over who has legitimate claims to Israel/Palestine.

The tone is often combative, with interruptions and personal attacks.

Zundel presents himself as offering a “German perspective” on these issues.

The caller accuses Zundel of anti-semitism and Nazi sympathies.

The radio host allows Zundel to speak at length but also gives time to opposing callers.

– KATANA]

JohnRobinson101 – https://www.bitchute.com/channel/pcBHZPgCtR2a

Researcher_PDF – https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Researcher_PDF%22

Ernst Zundel Video Collection – https://odysee.com/@ErnstZundelVideos:8

Published on Sat, Jul 15, 1967

Description

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 4 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 11,313 – Duration: 62 mins)

Ernst Zundel: This is Ernst Christoph Friedrich Zundel. I’m about to share with you what by now is a historical series of interviews, talk shows, tape recorded excerpts of radio shows and reactions to radio shows which I did in Montreal in 1967-68.

I used to live in Montreal for nine years amongst French-Canadians. Enjoyed my stay amongst the French-Canadian population immensely. It was a very interesting time for me in that I attended university in Montreal and was very active politically speaking. Sometimes four times a week at different places in churches, businessmen’s clubs, union halls, air cadets, Boy Scouts, schools and so on about political topics, mainly communism, separatism, and of course, my always and ever ready favourite topic, namely the swindle of the 6 million jews.

In those days, this was completely new terrain for me, as it was for everybody else. No one in the Western world publicly had discussed this topic very much and it was positively dangerous to one’s health to touch upon this topic.

However, I was writing a column in the university student newspaper and gave speeches at the university and so on, and always ready and willing to have an intellectual scrap, or whatever you want to call it.

I decided one night that I would like to discuss this particular topic on radio. And it came shortly after the war in 67, the Arab-Israeli war. And the reaction was so fantastic that I decided to tape some of these talk shows. Unfortunately, it would take hours and hours and hours to bring all the tapes that I have. So these here are really excerpts. The moderator of the show was a young English Canadian whom I have never met to this day, certainly only knew from the air, never even spoke in private via the telephone, always only while we were on the air or during commercial breaks. He was about my age, and later on I heard through somebody at the radio station that his father was in fact an RCMP, a Royal Canadian Mounted Police captain.

Now, I have no idea if this was the reason why this young man was allowing me so much airtime. It was an absolutely incredible situation in that he did allow me sometimes five hours of often very little interrupted time to expostulate and to expound my outlooks and theories on life. So much so as can be deducted later on from some of the statements made by jewish scholars who are complaining about the amount of airtime that I got.

He was a very kind fellow. I thought he was eminently fair. And for the first time I felt that the gentile side, or certainly my side or the German side of this issue got a really good public hearing and a good airing.

This issue that we are discussing in the following tape the Arab-Israeli dispute and the German reparations payment was so intensely and intensively discussed that delegations from the Canadian jewish Congress and from the Israeli consulate used to visit the radio station, putting all kinds of pressure on that radio station. And it’s again evident by what the moderator later on is saying when he repeats that he has had death threats and assassination threats, boycott threats and so on.

Also it is evident from the reaction of the jewish callers themselves. I would like to draw your attention to the fact of argumentation, how the jewish community of Montreal, both young and old, European and Canadian, male and female, of how they argue, the tactics and the methods that they employ. It is a tremendous lesson to be learnt.

All the hate and the vilification that can be mustered against an individual totally unknown to them, except for what is being said on the radio comes through there. You can see the intolerance towards me and towards things German. You can also see how impolite these people are in that they constantly interrupt me in this particular case. And they would do the same with other Gentiles, never to allow us to bring a thought, to develop it and to draw it to a logical conclusion. Constant interruption, constant deflection manoeuvres, constant ridiculing!

And another interesting feature of the discussion is obviously always the attack from the jewish side against the individual that is launching some kind of an idea. Never so much as to the content of the idea. Usually the attempt is made to destroy, in effect, the accuser. And I’m called a Nazi, a Neo-Nazi, a German, in the most hateful undertones, and men and women alike. It is very interesting.

The man is desperate and asked me during a commercial break to please come to his rescue. This is Mr Bell, the moderator, and to say something nice about the Israelis. Not that I had said anything that wasn’t nice, but he thought I should get him off the hook and get some of the pressure off him by stating my case of what the heck I was really driving at. Because he was being accused on air, off air, by the station manager and by the station employees, many of them who were jewish, of being an anti-semite of the worst kind!

And so that young man was desperate. And since he treated me very fairly, I also came out to take the pressure off him with one of my statements about my policy on Israel and so on.

Now, when one listens to this whole tape, I want to be specifically reminding you, listen to what happens to statistics when money is discussed. Statistics, sums of money, sums of people and so on. Money and numbers of money and amounts of dollars and amounts of people have nothing to do in the discussion on the airwaves. People get lost, confused! Just listen to the pauses in the argumentation whenever we are discussing different statistical facts and so on. This is a very important point.

[09:19]

In closing, I will have to point out yet again that the station manager was forced to have flown by a special courier plane every morning the five hour long tapes to the board of broadcast governors at that time in Ottawa, the capital of Canada. And these men would sit there and listen to the argumentation going on because the president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, Dean Maxwell Cohen, had stated in front of a Senate committee at the time that Ernst Zundel was:

“Poisoning the air and pitting jew against gentile.”

And so on in Canadian society. And the station was under threat to lose its licence. In effect, what happened, the programme was pushed back towards very late at night. The times were changed for the program. Sponsors were lost. This young man, Mr. Bell, in effect was again fired from his job, lost his livelihood and the station closed this particular talk show down!

Once again, jewish pressure had succeeded in silencing a voice. Listen to the tapes now.

[Start of radio show recording]

Ernst Zundel: An inexpensive way for Israel of gaining allies and of undermining Nasser and the other high hats. The $1 billions. This is pretty close to what the war costs currently. New budget came out in Israel and it allocates 37% of the total budget of the state of Israel for defense.

Radio Host: Right. Okay, there’s a call on the line now. And I don’t know whether this caller has figures or opinions.

Hello?

Caller 1: Hello? Hello. Yes, I want to explain something. This man who is talking to you is a German pro-Nazi, you understand? I know him. I don’t understand why you’re so interested in these stories.

Ernst Zundel: Well, is there a law against being interested in those stories?

Caller 1: I know that you are pro-Nazi German.

Ernst Zundel: It’s wonderful how you throw labels around. What are you?

You want to declare yourself? What you are?

Caller 1: Don’t try to come out and [words unclear] Speak to him. You’re in Canada, you’re not in Germany.

Ernst Zundel: I know I’m in Canada, that’s why I’m speaking Over The Airwaves here.

Caller 1: No, come on! Here you understand. Go to Adolf [word unclear]. You are pro-Nazi. I know who you are.

Ernst Zundel: Yeah, you are pretty rude, sir. Truth hurts doesn’t it?

Caller 1: You try to come out to Mr. Bell, but you never have a truth.

Ernst Zundel: Very true. I don’t have a chance with Mr. Bell.

Caller 1: Right. You are a pro-Nazi. Go to [word unclear] Okay?

Ernst Zundel: Maybe it indicates something. Maybe it indicates something.

[Caller hangs up]

Radio Host: Now we’re dealing right now with some figures that are contrary to figures I have. And we’re getting callers. You have a few calls to take here.

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Radio Host: Now, I don’t know if anyone has any figures against the figures you have, which you got from the consulate here. This is not the first time that whether you are on the air or off the air, that someone has accused you of being a Neo-Nazi or something. How do you react to that?

Ernst Zundel: Well, of course, being a German, they think it sticks.

But I would like to remind them that I was born in 1939. That made me exactly, let’s say three years old when Hitler was at his supreme. It made me six years old when the Allies liberated us. Moroccan troops and Algerian troops. And I had three sisters at the time. And I would like to tell those people how it felt to be liberated as a 6 year old boy. I also saw 141 bullet holes where my mother was chased across a field By a, [word unclear] you know.

Radio Host: Algerian and Moroccan troops. Where were you? Where were you exactly?

Ernst Zundel: Black Forest.

Radio Host: In the Black Forest?

Ernst Zundel: Maybe Freudenstadt, was burned down completely. The hospital city of Freudenstadt is about half an hour away from where I was born. Neighbor city of Portheim was bombed in February and, 20,000 people got killed in one night. All that as a boy. You never forget those things, the sirens wailing, the bombers coming across and everything else, you know.

Anyways, I was 6 years old when the war was over. Now I have a boy, he’s 8 years old. If I were to ask him, are you a conservative or liberal? He wouldn’t know. Certainly was no card carrying member of the Nazi party. I immigrated to Canada at the youth of 19, not even. I have been here for the last 10 years.

So I don’t quite see why I should go and discuss my ideas on the Middle East with Mr. Fontaine. As a matter of fact, I think it’s very intolerant from the man they called. Am I any less a Canadian because I am of German origin? I would like to remind this man that we are Canada’s third largest ethnic group by far. That we are far more numerous than the Ukrainians and that we are far more numerous than the jewish Canadians.

In other words, I have just as much legitimate right to be discussing anything that I believe, including the Middle East.

Radio Host: Right. Well, you don’t feel that you’re anti-Israeli?

Ernst Zundel: No, I’m not. No, I’m not anti-Israeli.

But as I always say in every discussion, there is not only two sides to a coin, there is three sides to a coin.

Radio Host: That’s what I say.

[15:08]

Ernst Zundel: And if I look at the Middle East, I look at those hapless Arabs in their tents and those Arab soldiers, I know they have no axe to grind against Israel. They are victims of very emotional propaganda, because anybody that has a short wave receiver can pick it up. The operator of Radio Cairo. And the argument always emanating from Cairo is:

“That the jews have stolen your land and that’s why you are living in misery and in poverty.”

That’s why your Radio Cairo is lying.

So [word unclear] last week called and suggested that possibly a way out for the Israelis would be to pay a settlement to those people that lost their home, and their fields, in their stores in 1948 and possibly 1953. Is that a crime? Is that unreasonable? Is that being Nazi? I don’t see so.

Radio Host: Well, I think we have a gentleman on the line that you were talking with originally.

Sir?

Caller 1: Yes.

Radio Host: You’re on the air.

Caller 1: Okay.

Ernst Zundel: Yes.

Caller 1: Okay. Now, I don’t know about what you were when you were six, but you’re not six now. So the fact that you were six when Hitler was in power doesn’t have any logical reference to what you might be. Now, I’m not saying what you are or are not, but that has as illogical as an argument.

Let me ask you this.

Ernst Zundel: Yeah.

Caller 1: You say that two things. In the first place, you gave a figure, incidentally, I’m the chap you spoke to you last week.

Ernst Zundel: Right. I recognise your voice.

Caller 1: You gave a figure that a certain number of billions of dollars was paid to individuals, right. In Israel. What was that figure?

Ernst Zundel: According to the German consulate, it’s seven billion.

Caller 1: Seven billion?

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Caller 1: Now, how many jews were in Germany in 1933? German jews?

Ernst Zundel: 680,000.

Caller 1: How many German jews were killed by the Nazis?

Ernst Zundel: I think the figure is 320,000.

Caller 1: Well, I have a figure for you.

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Caller 1: It’s a very large one. In fact, I think it’s a bit exaggerated. But even if that’s a true figure., …

Ernst Zundel: How much is it?

Caller 1: About 100,000 German refugees, German jews were left after the war. I think that’s a high figure, but I’m not sure. But even if that’s a high figure, if they all went to Israel, which they didn’t do, you see, if they all went to Israel, which they didn’t do, and if they were all paid according to you, they would all, by my calculation, they would all receive, have received about $55,000 a piece!

Ernst Zundel: Just a moment, sir. Just a moment. I know figures.

Caller 1: Let me ask you this now.

Ernst Zundel: No, just you let me answer you right back.

Caller 1: Okay.

Ernst Zundel: So we don’t get off the track here.

Caller 1: Okay.

Ernst Zundel: The missing 200,000 or 250,000. Between my figure and your figure. Did you ever think that many jews between 1933 and 1938 went to Czechoslovakia?

Caller 1: Are you kidding?

Ernst Zundel: No, I’m not on that. I’m dead serious, man! I can bring you very [words unclear] that went to Czechoslovakia and that went to Vienna and that went to France and that went to, …

Caller 1: Are you kidding?

Ernst Zundel: I’m dead serious.

Caller 1: How can you be. How can you be. How can you be dead serious?

Ernst Zundel: Okay, we have a very prominent Montreal journalist that is always interviewed, that writes for many tourist papers. If Mr. Bell wants to pass the name up, I’ll give you the name. He left Germany in 1933.

Caller 1: Of course. Of course, there was some. But it required a great deal of money and they had to leave most of their property behind.

Ernst Zundel: But he didn’t. This man’s father didn’t.

Caller 1: Yeah, well, you have an individual case.

Ernst Zundel: Just a moment.

Caller 1: You have an individual case.

Okay, so how many were left? 300,000, you say. If there are 300,000 German jews left.

Ernst Zundel: No, I didn’t say that. The figures that, as you said to yourself, there are some exaggerated figures.

Caller 1: No, no, my figures exaggerated 100,000. I think it was very much fewer. But even if it’s 100,000, that would give each one of them $55,000. Is that what they got in reparations from Germany?

Ernst Zundel: Sir, I didn’t count the money. All I did is some research. Told the authorities that paid the money and that had the money on the book.

Caller 1: Now, did you go to the people who received the money?

Ernst Zundel: No, sir, I didn’t try to.

Caller 1: Well, let me give you some advice. If you go down the street from the West German consulate, there’s the Israeli consulate.

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Caller 1: Why didn’t you bother to take the figures that you got from the German consulate down to the Israeli consulate, and ask them if they put the same interpretation or indeed if they have the same figures that you got from the Germans? Does that ever occur to you? If you’re a journalist?

Radio Host: That’s a fairly good idea.

Caller 1: You’re a journalist, aren’t you?

Ernst Zundel: Yes, sir, it has occurred to me.

Caller 1: Well, before you get on the earth, before you send any stories to any newspapers, before you publish anything, go and check your figures from both sources. You say stories have two sides, and these three sides!

Ernst Zundel: Would the New York Times be a good source for accurate information?

Caller 1: I just told you what to do. And why didn’t you go to the Israeli consulate?

[20:05]

Ernst Zundel: Sir, would the New York Times you good source?

Caller 1: No, I don’t trust. I don’t trust any newspaper.

Ernst Zundel: Don’t eh?

Caller 1: No.

Ernst Zundel: Well, maybe I’m a bit more trustworthy. I trust that the Minister of Finance.

Caller 1: All I have of course is your report of what you read in the New York Times.

Ernst Zundel: The Minister of Finance of Germany had faced 482 Parliamentarians in Germany. Plus the whole press corp.

Caller 1: Yeah, yeah.

Ernst Zundel: Plus the Canadian [words unclear], plus the Canadian Jewish Eagle, plus the International Scientist Organisation and stated that we have, …

Caller 1: Let me ask you something else. Let me ask you something else.

Ernst Zundel: Go right ahead.

Caller 1: You mentioned the Canadian Jewish Eagle, eh, This is a Yiddish newspaper.

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Caller 1: I have many, many Christian friends here in Canada. As a matter of fact my adult years were all spent amongst non-jews. I’m a very jewish person. I would have to speak to 1,000 of them to find out anyone who has ever heard of the Canadian Jewish Eagle. How come you’re so interested? How do you know about it?

Ernst Zundel: Is it a crime to be?

Caller 1: No, no!

I’m just curious as to how you come to know about it. Do you read Yiddish?

Ernst Zundel: Do I read Yiddish?

Caller 1: Yes.

Ernst Zundel: That’s my business. I just might, you know.

Caller 1: You just might.

Ernst Zundel: Yeah.

Caller 1: Just like [word unclear] and he reads Yiddish too.

Ernst Zundel: Let me tell you something. If maybe that indicates something to you that my grandfather’s name was Isidor Meyer.

Caller 1: Isidor Meyer?

Ernst Zundel: Yeah. How do you like that for [word unclear] You think about that for a while.

Caller 1: Listen, listen. If you know any German history, you would know that German history is filled with a man like, … Do you know any German history? Ever hear of a man named Peppercorn?

Ernst Zundel: Yes, I know a man.

Caller 1: He went by the name named Peppercorn, lived about 400 years ago.

Ernst Zundel: That’s right.

Caller 1: And he was one of the worst anti-semites, a convert, that ever lived. I don’t care what your grandfather was called. You see, that’s not evidence of any kind.

Ernst Zundel: I didn’t say whether I read Yiddish or not.

Caller 1: I’m just curious about your interest in it, you see. What is your interest?

Ernst Zundel: My interest is.

Caller 1: Yeah.

Ernst Zundel: I’m interested in many things. You want to have a couple of statistics?

Caller 1: No, no, just why are you. Why are you so interested in the jewish question and Israel?

Ernst Zundel: Because it is very vitally involved with Germany and with the history that we are being taught.

Caller 1: Can I read something to you in a moment, Mr. Bell?

Ernst Zundel: Mr. Bell.

Radio Host: Yeah, I’m listening.

Caller 1: You got a moment there? Can I read something? I’ll give you the name of the guy who wrote it just in the paper as well, but just let me read it, if we’re concerned with these raids back and forth and the German interest in it.

Radio Host: Ah ha.

Caller 1: One of the more efficient leaders. This is a publication date of January 3rd.

Ernst Zundel: What year?

Caller 1:1969.

One of the more efficient leaders of the Al Fatah terrorist organisation is a tall, slender man who calls himself Al Hatch, “Pilgrim” in English. Al Hatch heads a group of specialists trained to assemble bombs which in turn are smuggled into crowded civilian areas of Old Jerusalem. In all likelihood, the recent terrorist attack which cut scores of lives in all Jerusalem, most of them women and children, are the work of this man.

Al Hatch is a master of disguise. He crosses the border sometimes in Arab guard, but more often dressed like a European. He also sports a forged Swiss passport. In his European clothes, he does not look one bit like an Arab, and for this reason, he was able to cross practically at will until his identity became known. There’s a good reason why Al Hatch is able to pass as a European. He is none other than Richard Winterhalter, formerly of the SS Death head squad. Winterhalter, wanted by West Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia for war crimes, operated both in Terezin, Theresienstadt and Auschwitz. Winterhalter was the key man who arranged for the death trains bringing elderly people from Terezin to the Birkenau extermination factories. He has also trained the special command of Auschwitz prisoners temporarily reprieved from the gruesome task of bringing bodies of murder victims from gas chambers to the crematoria.

Winterhalter escaped from a British prisoner of war camp during the summer of 1945 and crossed him to Italy. From there he made his way to Egypt, where he converted to Islam. During 1949, he made his pilgrimage to Mecca, calling himself Al Hatch. The newly created Mohammedan, promptly joined the battle against Israel and served under the notorious Mufti of Jerusalem. So, on about the deliberation plan.

Ernst Zundel: Now, who writes? What paper is it?

Caller 1: This is written by Peter Lust.

Ernst Zundel: Oh, well, Mr. Peter Lust. Wonderful.

Caller 1: Yeah. Now, this information, since he names this name, it suggests to me several things. In the first place, I want to ask a general question. I don’t dislike the Germans. I’ve been to Germany several times. I’ve met many young German people, in fact, in Israel. But I don’t understand. This is what I just can’t get through my mind about the German engineers who worked in Egypt, the German engineers who are working in Syria.

The Germans are helping these people now to fight the jews. Why can’t they just leave them alone? You know, they tried to get rid of them 30 years ago, 20 years ago. Why can’t they just leave them alone? Why just have to go on and on trying to get rid of what Hitler left over. Can you explain that to me as a German?

[25:08]

Ernst Zundel: I don’t know.

Caller 1: Have you ever thought about it?

Ernst Zundel: I don’t. Look, I came to Canada when I was 19 years old.

Caller 1: Don’t give us that bit again. You know. How old are you now? You’re 30?

Ernst Zundel: Yeah, I’m 30.

Caller 1: So you read newspapers?

Ernst Zundel: Yes, I do.

Caller 1: So you read about your fellow Germans who work for the Egyptians and the Syrians? What do you think about it?

Ernst Zundel: What do I think about it?

Caller 1: Yes.

Ernst Zundel: They’re engineers. They were forbidden by the allied, …

Caller 1: What do you think about it? No, don’t tell us about what they were forbidden. What do you think about it as a fellow German?

Ernst Zundel: You don’t have to be so aggressive. Anybody that shouts and screams indicates usually that he is [word unclear]

Caller 1: Not necessarily. If he gets stupid replies, he has to shout.

Ernst Zundel: I haven’t even made my replies, because you are so aggressive. So.

Caller 1: Well, what do you think about it?

Ernst Zundel: What do I think about it?

Caller 1: Yes.

Ernst Zundel: These people like for instance, Messerschmitt that build a plane for the Egyptians and the engineers like. Well, I think Metzgar is one of his name that builds El Kahir that never brought fire during the Arab-Israeli war, which is a rocket with a 600 mile range, along the V2 line. These men, by the treaties of or by the Nuremberg Judgment, are forbidden to build this kind of stuff in Germany. So they were looking for new fields.

Caller 1: Yeah, but why did you mean. Was that the only place. You know? There are many Germans who go to Israel to work. I’ve met them there. I’ve met them working in the kibbutzene, if they wanted. If they wanted to go someplace to work.

Ernst Zundel: If you are Messerschmitt that had designed jet planes and rockets, you’re hardly inclined to continue your career in an Israeli kibbutz.

Caller 1: I suppose. I thought he could have gone to Brazil where Dr. Mengele is, you know.

Ernst Zundel: Yeah. What is Dr Mengele, is he a rocket engineer?

Caller 1: No. Well, I could have gone to Brazil needs. It’s a funny thing, but they always end up. They always seem to end up on the side facing the jews! What do they want from us?

Ernst Zundel: Wernher von Braun is he facing the jews, sir?

Caller 1: You got one example there. And you had dozens working in Syria and Egypt.

Ernst Zundel: Anybody that followed Apollo lately knows precisely how many German rocket scientists are in America.

Caller 1: I’m not so excited about Wernher von Braun either I’m interested in knowing from him he’s going to testify in a trial. You know, I’m interested in knowing from him just as I’m interested in knowing from other just plain soldiers when they were in Germany for that long period. And since they are not stupid people. He knew exactly what he was doing when he was designing the V2s. You know, his conscience is not that kind that gives me admiration. I would just assume, just assume if he had been told that if he didn’t design the vehicles, they would shoot him, that he had let himself be shot. You know, he’s not one of my great heroes.

Ernst Zundel: How many of you Russian scientists that created the what they call the Stalin Organ rocket?

Caller 1: I haven’t the slightest idea about that.

Ernst Zundel: All right, how many of the, …

Caller 1: Let me ask you one last question.

Ernst Zundel: How many of the Canadians. Hang on for a moment. Do this one by one. Okay.

Caller 1: Yeah.

Ernst Zundel: You thought you could bring in a couple of good points and let me answer them.

Caller 1: Yeah.

Ernst Zundel: Those people that designed Liberator bombers.

Caller 1: I haven’t the slightest idea.

Ernst Zundel: Jews themselves.

Caller 1: Liberator bombers?

Ernst Zundel: That turned Dresden into a fiery inferno.

Caller 1: Are you? You’re not serious, are you?

Ernst Zundel: I’m dead serious.

Caller 1: The more you talk. You know, you’d be smart if you hung up right now. The more you talk you give yourself away.

Ernst Zundel: Why are you afraid you’re losing the argument?

Caller 1: No, what’s the point of bringing Dresden into this?

Ernst Zundel: Because in Dresden the estimates are apart from Mr. Peter Lust that was invited by Walter Ulbricht at his expense to go behind the Iron Curtain. I think Mr. Irving in England wrote a book about it.

Caller 1: Yes, I read the book. I read the book.

Ernst Zundel: All right. He says 300,000 people got killed in one single bombing raid.

Caller 1: Yeah, well, if the Germans had been smart in 1933 and they sat on Hitler, they wouldn’t have killed in 1944.

Ernst Zundel: We are not talking about who is smart. We are talking about what crimes.

Caller 1: Well, the Germans themselves were responsible for it. That was no crime. I’m against it. I’m against killing anyone. I wouldn’t have killed that one. You know, I’m against killing everyone. But once you start on that road, once you start on that road, that’s the way you end up.

[29:23]

Ernst Zundel: Yes, but anyway, doesn’t that answer my original argument again?

Caller 1: No, it has nothing to do with it because the people, …

Ernst Zundel: Wernher von Braun should have shot himself?

Caller 1: Yes, absolutely! Before even trying to [word unclear].

Ernst Zundel: Just a minute. Air Vice Marshall Harris that was in charge in England of the bombing of Dresden. There over 300,000 people, mainly refugees and women in an undefended city. It was called an “open city” via the Red Cross from Geneva. There was not one fighter plane that protected it. No [words unclear].

Caller 1: I can just imagine Hitler doing that. Well, my dear chap, I mean this is the information you get from what side?

Ernst Zundel: These 300,000 people got killed. I don’t see Air Vice Marshall Harris shooting himself.

Caller 1: That’s hardly a comparison, you know. Air Marshall Harris was fighting against an aggressor. It was Hitler that started the war!

Ernst Zundel: Well, you know, finding out [word unclear] is very interesting because, …

Caller 1: I see. As I told you’d better hang up. The longer you talk, the more you give yourself away.

Ernst Zundel: Just a minute. We’ll come back to it because you, …

Caller 1: You certainly sound like a six year old.

Ernst Zundel: Fine. I’m taking history at Sir George Williams University, sir. And you know what they are teaching us there? That at the very same time, I think it’s Sep 9, 1939, that Hitler walked into one side of Poland, Stalin walking to the other side of Poland. He occupied half of Poland and Hitler occupied the other side of Poland.

Caller 1: Two birds of a feather.

Ernst Zundel: Pardon?

Caller 1: So how does that make Hitler less an aggressor?

Ernst Zundel: If you are fighting the aggressor. Your point was that Air Vice Marshall Harris was fighting an aggressor?

Caller 1: That’s right. Hitler walked into Czechoslovakia, …

Ernst Zundel: Just a minute. Why was Air Vice Marshal Harris not also bombing Moscow?

Caller 1: They weren’t fighting with Moscow? Moscow wasn’t the enemy.

Ernst Zundel: Moscow was an aggressive, just as much as Hitler was!

Caller 1: Yeah, but Moscow hadn’t attacked England. Moscow wasn’t firing V2s at England. Besides that Hitler had, …

Ernst Zundel: [words unclear] aren’t you?

Caller 1: No, no. Yeah, you give yourself away.

Let me ask you one last thing. Let’s get back to 1968. Let’s get back to 1969.

Ernst Zundel: Yeah.

Caller 1: We follow your advice. The Israeli government from the $14 billion plus the $7 billion it’s got for the individuals.

Ernst Zundel: I didn’t say that.

Caller 1: Incidentally, is that the word that the Germans are using reparations that they paid to Israel?

Ernst Zundel: No.

Caller 1: What word do they use?

Ernst Zundel: In German they call it [word unclear] That means “to make good again”.

Caller 1: I see, Right. It’s not reparations since Israel wasn’t at war with Germany, right?

Ernst Zundel: And then some Germans wonder if Israel didn’t exist as a state, why Germany should pay for it as it didn’t exist?

Caller 1: Yeah, that’s a good question. Do you wonder that too?

Ernst Zundel: No, but I’m just pointing out to you.

Caller 1: Let me ask you guys. Let’s carry on then here, eh? You say you’re suggesting to solve the problem in the Middle East. East that Israel with its $14 billion and its $7 billion.

Ernst Zundel: I didn’t say 14 billion and 7 billion. You got the figures wrong. You should listen more closely, let hear what you want to hear.

Caller 1: Didn’t you say that the reparations, so-called, to Israel was $14 billion and the money paid to individuals was $7 billion? Isn’t that what you said?

Ernst Zundel: No, I didn’t.

Caller 1: What did you say?

Ernst Zundel: I said that under the treaty with the state of Israel directly, Germany made payments to the state of Israel to the tune of $3, 450,000,000. And this, …

Caller 1: What’s the 14 billion dollar figure?

Ernst Zundel: Pardon?

Caller 1: What’s the 14,000,000,000 dollar figure?

Ernst Zundel: I said up to 1969 all the reparations by policy paid to individuals, to the state, people living outside Israel was $14 billion.

Caller 1: Including people living outside Israel?

Ernst Zundel: Yeah.

Caller 1: What’s that got to do with the Israeli government?

Ernst Zundel: Okay, I’ll try. I’ll do it slowly for you. Okay.

I said separate treaty. One is between Israel as a state, you know as a state government of Israel?

Caller 1: Yeah.

Ernst Zundel: Between the Bonn government and the Israeli government. Money involved in that?

Caller 1: Yes, that’s 3, 450,000, you say.

Ernst Zundel: And there were payments involved between Israeli and between jewish individuals and carrying Israeli passport. But they don’t have to live in Israel, because Germany allows a dual citizenship in the case of a jew. Do you understand?

Caller 1: So you’re not including the figure of German ex-German refugees who had never gone to Israel? You’re not adding in that figure? You know, not all German refugees went to Israel.

Ernst Zundel: I know that.

Caller 1: So you’re talking with German refugees who either went to Israel and left or else they got the Israeli passport and here’s the passport. Okay, well this is a small thing. The first thing, let me repeat that you better, you’d better go to the Israeli consulate and find out what their side of the story is. Now in addition to that, let’s take your figure for what it. Let’s take your figure for what it may be. I accept your figure!

Ernst Zundel: Israel and James Weissman and David Ben Gurion and Levy Ashbolt, they have never quarrelled with these figures. Because these figures are open for everyone to see, including Mr [word unclear]

Caller 1: I accept them all. I’m not quarrelling with them either. I accept them in total, including your translation into German Reichmarks, so it sounds like 50 billion. But I’m not quarrelling with that. You’re suggesting, you’re suggesting, …

[35:03]

Ernst Zundel: Just a minute. I’m afraid I have to translate it into German marks because Germany doesn’t deal in [word unclear] or in [word unclear].

Caller 1: Yeah, but what purpose was there for you to mention German marks at all? All Canadians can understand dollars.

Ernst Zundel: It’s the currency to start with, ..

Caller 1: Yeah, I know, but you you said whatever the figure was 50 billion Marks. That sounds like $50 billion to someone not listening carefully.

Ernst Zundel: One second after I gave it in dollars. So look, don’t, …

Caller 1: Yeah, okay.

Ernst Zundel: You’re terribly suspicious, I must say.

Caller 1: So we’ve got whatever billions of figures you got there. And you’re suggesting that they should take some of this money and pay to whatever refugees are within their reach. Well, how much to each one.

Ernst Zundel: Nope. The last time I suggested. And this is my suggestion as an individual, it’s not a German government policy. They would be horrified if they heard me discuss this problem anyways because they’re such cowards when it comes to this.

Caller 1: What have you got to do with them? You said you’re a Canadian. What do they care what you say? What do they care what you say?

Ernst Zundel: I’m just declaring it to you.

Caller 1: Yeah, okay. So what’s your figure? 500 bucks a piece?

Ernst Zundel: No, I said commensurate with what they lost. And this is very easy.

Caller 1: But they didn’t lose anything, you see. They weren’t chased away. They left of their own accord, as you said yourself, because the legislation, the agreement, or rather the resolution that was passed at the United Nations at that time in 1947, which divided Palestine, remember not including Jordan, just Palestine, west of the Jordan, into two states, gave to the Israelis only that part of Palestine which was generally occupied by jews on land which they had bought from the effendis, and for which, incidentally, they also paid the peasants who didn’t own it at all!

In other words, these refugees didn’t leave from any land which at that time belonged to the jews. They left of their own accord, as you have yourself admitted on broadcast. On broadcast from their Arab neighbours. Okay, now, so what should, what should they be compensated for?

Ernst Zundel: Let me continue. First of all, many people that left were not peasants. Many of them were, …

Caller 1: I didn’t say that they were peasants. Those that left from [word unclear] weren’t peasants.

Ernst Zundel: You know, in other words.

Caller 1: But they weren’t chased away.

Ernst Zundel: Look, this wasn’t my argument at all! You’re always trying to put words in my mouth. I didn’t say that you don’t have to be hostile.

Caller 1: So why should they have to be recompensed for what I said?

Ernst Zundel: Oh, hold on. Look, tonight when I came on again, if Israel is in need of allies, which I think she is, and Israel says she is, then those 2 million Arabs would be very good allies.

Caller 1: What makes you think that?

Ernst Zundel: What makes me think that?

Caller 1: Yes.

Ernst Zundel: Because these people are, I’m sure, very tired of living in tents. They would be very good friends of Israel if they thought that the Israelis were giving them a hefty deal than the Arabs.

Caller 1: And it’s your speculation that if they were paid by the Israelis, they would suddenly become friends of the Israelis. Is that your speculation?

Ernst Zundel: Hold on, those Arabs that are living in Israel since 1948, you yourself and every other jewish caller that called said they are treated like an Israeli, they are prospering, they have all the military service and everything else.

Caller 1: Okay.

Ernst Zundel: Are they hostile to Israel?

Caller 1: Generally speaking, no.

Ernst Zundel: Okay. You see what I mean?

Caller 1: No, but it’s hardly the same thing, you know.

Ernst Zundel: It’s the same thing. Right now hundreds of thousands of Arab refugees are living in territory administered by Israel.

So what I was suggesting was extend the same policies that you, …

Caller 1: That’s not the same. That’s not the same policy, at all! You know, if you were to pay them whatever figure you think would be adequate, would they be then brought back to Israel or would they be left where they are? Where would they go? With their little payment, with their little check? Where would they go?

Ernst Zundel: Hold on for a minute. It would be in the interest of Israel, I suppose that they would settle them somewhere, which I think Israel is trying to do.

Caller 1: In Israel? In Israel? In Israel?

Ernst Zundel: No, in the new territory.

Caller 1: What new territory? The Israelis aren’t keeping those territories.

Ernst Zundel: According to the Montreal which I have in front of me, it says that these territories are called the “new territories”.

Caller 1: These territories are called the new territories?

Ernst Zundel: Right.

Caller 1: What date? What story is that?

[News Break]

Radio Host: You had a question you wanted to ask? Go ahead.

Caller 1: The other end is not just taking up your time. But he considered what he suggested, a practical solution to the problem. Now does he consider. We didn’t finish before we went to the news. Is he suggesting, if I may be wrong, suggesting that these people would, the refugees would come into Israel to get paid.

In other words, the one and a half million who are now outside would have to return to Israel. They would get to pay whatever. He didn’t specify what amount of, let’s say, several hundred dollars. And they would remain in Israel, Is that the suggestion?

[40:12]

Ernst Zundel: I can’t decide where they wanted to go, where Israel wanted them to. It’s entirely up to them. But my main point in bringing up the payment angle is that I know that those people live on handouts from the United Nations and they are always in every story that we hear and read it, that they were dispossessed by the Israelis.

Caller 1: Yeah, but this. Yeah, I know, but, …

Ernst Zundel: You see what I mean, it would be a good point as far, not as a publicity stunt, I wouldn’t want to say it that way. But it would be a great deal in the favour of Israel as far as the world situation is concern. And specifically for those small Arab people, whether they be peasants or herdsmen or former storekeepers. To them, I’m sure it would show the goodwill of Israel and it would make life out of every statement that emanates from Beirut or from Cairo as [word unclear].

Caller 1: It doesn’t require this to show up the statements that emanate those countries as lies tell people to those people.

Ernst Zundel: People with a full stomach and a square meal and more comfortable mud hut rather than a, …

Caller 1: But don’t you don’t, in the first place, if you base your suggestion on the moral question that they were dispossessed by the Israelis, therefore the Israelis would look better in the eyes of the world by recompensing them in one way or another. This is from a false start because they were not dispossessed by the Israelis.

This point has been made time and time again! And it doesn’t matter how often uninformed people say that they were dispossessed by the Israelis, it still doesn’t make it true, because you can’t turn back history and say because it’s repeated, therefore it becomes true. The only reason there should be any compensation, I mean, if the Israelis had it and if other governments had it, they should give it to their human being.

But from a practical point of view, I don’t see, looking at the way the Arab governments around there operate, I don’t think it would make any difference whatsoever to forming, to getting peace with the Arab countries. This is what the Israelis are after. They want to sit down with Egypt and with Jordan and with Syria, if Syria can stay on one seat for a long enough time and sign a peace treaty after 20 years.

Now, how payments to the refugees who would either be kept after that they can’t be admitted to Israel because Israel hasn’t got room for them. What they would do with the money, that they would go to Amman or they would go to Cairo. Those countries could have taken them before and they didn’t. They kept them there for a special purpose. And for you to think that because they will get several, on the contrary, it’s very likely that what would happen if they got the money, it’s such an impractical suggestion. How would the money get to them outside? Would they be in checks or in cash? In Jordanian money and Egyptian money? You know, if they got it, they would probably end up in their mind having the money taken from them by those governments. What makes you think that if they were to receive that money, it would make the slightest difference in the attitude of the Arab governments, the Arab governments to Israel?

Ernst Zundel: First of all, I have to. Maybe I am naive, I doubt it. But the point is, if Israel wants to have peace, it is obvious that the Arab government for the last, 20 years, the government, the cliques in power, whether they be the Bath party, whether they be the colonels of Nasser or whatever they are, those in power are not speaking for the small peasants, but they are using those peasants as a weapon and as a tool.

Caller 1: Let me ask you something. Have you been to the Middle East?

Ernst Zundel: No, I haven’t.

Caller 1: Have you never been to Turkey?

Ernst Zundel: No, I haven’t.

Caller 1: Or Egypt? None of those countries?

Ernst Zundel: Have you been to the moon?

Caller 1: Yeah. No, no, I’ve been to those countries and it doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference what the peasants think. It’s the colonels that are in Cairo that matter at this point. I don’t see what the peasants, how the peasants [words unclear] at all!

They’re medieval countries, you know.

Ernst Zundel: I don’t see that the [word unclear] himself has stopped across the border, planted a mine in the market in Jerusalem and blown up 10 Israelis.

Caller 1: He might as well have. What difference does it make? He tolerated the people who did it.

Caller 2: Not partial at all! This is the World Almanac of the 1966 Yearbook of Britannica. Now, there’s no bias in there or any prejudice. I will quote you if I may.

Ernst Zundel: Right. Well, I got my figures from an almanac too.

Caller 1: Oh, okay. The overall picture, this is page 430. Under the topic of Israel. The overall picture was one of continuing prosperity and expansion, tempered by a growing balance of payments problems which was expected to become more serious because of the ending of the German reparations payments. This I assume, is in 65, which had ended.

Ernst Zundel: [words unclear]

Caller 2: Just a minute.

Ernst Zundel: World Almanac reparations payment too.

Caller 2: These had accounted for about $70 million annually. Now, if you carry that for 20 years, that would be a total of 1, 400,000,000. Which does not come anywhere close to your figures.

So how do you account for that? This is to the state of Israel, money reparation.

[45:22]

Ernst Zundel: Well, how do I count for that?

Caller 2: You said 7 billion.

Ernst Zundel: I thought I went to the horse’s mouth.

Caller 2: I beg your pardon.

Ernst Zundel: I thought I went to the horse’s mouth.

Caller 2: Yeah, but you went to the wrong horse.

Caller 1: Your zoology is all wrong.

Ernst Zundel: It’s the person that pays the Bill usually less in funds than the person that, …

Caller 1: He usually tries to build up what he paid, though.

Radio Host: Well, in terms of Britannica, though, I would assume that to arrive at any figure they would go to more than both sides. Again you have to, …

Caller 1: Definitely! And through the fact that it involves the changing of funds into international currency of some kind.

Radio Host: Right. Well, when we use the term dollar, it is accepted that it is the American dollar.

Caller 1: Yes, that’s right. That’s the international currency.

Ernst Zundel: Hold on for a moment. I’m mulling this thing over here.

Caller 1: Yeah, it’s probably 7 billion in Reichmarks is that would make it a billion 400,000!

Radio Host: Yes, it wouldn’t it?

Caller 1: Yeah, 7 billion Reichmarks would make it a billion 400,000.

Ernst Zundel: The ratio is not.

Radio Host: No, the ratio is 3 to 1, isn’t it?

Caller 1:5 to 1.

Ernst Zundel: No, no.

Caller 1:4 to 1. Something around there.

Ernst Zundel: It’s now 32 cents per mark.

Caller 1: That’s now. So that’s now. The dollar has fallen. The Mark is up, is very strong.

Radio Host: Right. So there are three marks in the dollar, roughly.

Ernst Zundel: No more. There’s, …

Radio Host: Well, like in terms of 31 billion marks, you got your figure. $10 billion.

Ernst Zundel: Roughly. Yeah.

Radio Host: I mean, we’re being rough, but you know.

Caller 1: So you speak German? Maybe they told him in Germany he doesn’t understand!

Ernst Zundel: Very funny, very funny!

Radio Host: Well, anybody can look it up if they have Britannica.

Caller 1: Yeah, of course, you shouldn’t argue with [word unclear].

Radio Host: Anyway, this is curious. I’m looking up to find, you know, where I. Again, you see, there are cross indexes here and I have the United Nations roster to find out, you know, where to find West Germany. I can’t find them on the roster here.

Caller 1: Look for it on the Republic of West Germany.

Ernst Zundel: No no, West Germany is not a member of the United Nations.

Radio Host: I was coming to that conclusion and I was afraid to say so, but it appears it is not a member of the United Nations.

Caller 1: I wonder why?

Ernst Zundel: Germany wasn’t at the time considered to be fit to be part of member nation.

Radio Host: Well, well, well, there are 124 members. Neither Germany is here.

Ernst Zundel: No, neither will you find, I think South Korea and North Korea. Neither South Vietnam and North Vietnam.

Radio Host: That’s right. They’re not here.

Ernst Zundel: That’s right.

Caller 1: Let me go on. Can I go on for something that has a similar, two similar suggestions that are made that relate somehow to your suggestion, it’s a speculation as to whether what you do will have the desired effect. You know, Israel can pay out this two or $3 billion or whatever it happens to be, and it should go down the drain, down the Suez Canal and hear no more about it. And they should be just as violent.

So it would be a pretty dangerous thing for Israel to carry that out on your say so.

Let me ask something else now. It is suggested that Israel, in the case of this attack on Beirut, that as a matter of fact, the message came the Pope after he had been criticised for his first statement, he made another statement which wasn’t a very satisfactory either one. It sounded like he was saying:

“Well, you’re both wrong, so both stop fighting.”

It suggested that if the Israelis wouldn’t retaliate, which is what they’re being charged with, that the Salahi, that the Al Fatah and the terrorists would stop crossing the border.

Now, anyone who thinks that if the Israelis would not respond, then the people on the Jordanian side, the terrorists would stop, you know, must be out of his mind! What else can the Israelis do if they’re being shot at? They shoot back. You know, they were to stop in order to conform to what the Pope suggests and other very kind people are suggesting that they should stop escalating it. They’ll be run over!

Ernst Zundel: The jews have a law, a eye for a eye, a tooth for a tooth.

Caller 1: Oh, come on now!

The next thing you’re going to tell me, the next thing you’re going to tell me is that I belong to a tribe. You know, you sound like something out of the Middle Ages!

Ernst Zundel: Well, Life magazine has [word unclear] that.

Caller 1: I don’t care what Life magazine does! You know, what’s this “eye for an eye” business? That went out of fashion 2500 years ago!

Radio Host: Well, it’s back in vogue now because it’s interpreted by many as referring to transplants! [chuckling]

Caller 1: Israel is clear that the reason for their attack on the Beirut airport, and they made specific, they made very good, very good care that no one should be hurt, was to teach the Arab countries around there that the Israeli Airlines was not something that could be just thrown away. They had to show them it wasn’t an eye for an eye. It wasn’t revenge of any kind. It was to teach them that if they carried on the path that they were following that they would suffer for it! Which would make them stop. And this has been the reason for all the Israeli so-called retaliation. What they get is the time of peace. And usually it has happened. There has been hardly any fighting around this way because the Israelis hit back hard!

[50:39]

Ernst Zundel: Every news commentator that I have listened to from the United States, from Europe and the GDC, they all say that these terrorist organisations have succeeded in their primary aim and that is to make Israel overreact. Would you say Israel overreacted?

Caller 1: No, I wouldn’t. I don’t see how she could overreact. I don’t see how she could overreact by destroying 13 aeroplanes in exchange for human life. That’s not an overreaction.

Ernst Zundel: [words unclear]

Radio Host: How’s that?

Ernst Zundel: Everybody else seems to think so. Including [word unclear].

Caller 1: Now, tell me something. What difference does it make in a question of right and wrong what everybody else thinks?

Ernst Zundel: Well, first again there is your right and there is they are wrong and there is you’re wrong and they are right.

Radio Host: Okay, just before somebody calls up and correct us on it, let me correct it.

As far as the Deutsche marks is concerned, there are 3.988 per US dollar. Okay gentlemen. The last gentleman who is on the line. Are you satisfied with the point you made?

Caller 2: Yeah. I have one more point to make.

Radio Host: What is it, sir?

Caller 2: Have you ever heard of the flying carpet notion whereby about a million jews would [word unclear] all the Arab countries including Yemen, Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt and Syria, were all thrown into Israel without a penny in their pockets and it was the Israeli government who undertook them, closed them, fed them and gave them jobs. They came into Israel without a penny in their pocket.

Radio Host: Right. Well, in terms of restitution or reparation, it has been suggested by our caller that these people be included.

Caller 2: Yes, but why they forgotten? When everybody talks about the Palestinian refugees, what about these people?

Radio Host: Well, as was suggested when I when mention it that it had not been mentioned before. It’s a suggestion from a staff member who was in the booth with me at the time.

Caller 1: Would the restitution come from the Arab government? They should be the ones responsible because that’s where they came from.

Caller 2: Exactly!

Caller 1: And can you imagine them doing it?

Ernst Zundel: Well, look, why don’t give them the benefit of the doubt.

Caller 1: Give whom the benefit of the doubt?

Ernst Zundel: The Arab government, put you on the spot.

Caller 1: Are you a journalist? Did you say you’re a journalist?

Ernst Zundel: Yes, I’m a journalist.

Caller 1: Why are you dreaming? Why are you having these dreams?

Ernst Zundel: You know something? I have to make a very basic point here.

Caller 1: Yes.

Ernst Zundel: You people. And this is so evidently so when you listen to these open lines. You are extremely sensitive! And you are always having such a perfect taste.

Caller 1: It has nothing to do with this! It has nothing to do with it!

Ernst Zundel: I’m a fan of Sherlock Holmes and of Perry Mason and you know about Perry Mason? Everybody that watches television, you know what Perry Mason does? He usually investigates the guy with the perfect alibi first.

Caller 1: Do you know something else? I’ve listened to you two evenings. I haven’t heard you say a good thing about the Israelis.

Ernst Zundel: I haven’t?

Caller 1: No.

Ernst Zundel: Well, my suggestion was that they should possibly pay restitution.

Caller 1: What kind of a good thing is this? This is the sort of a dream that has no relation to reality.

Caller 2: Can I bring in another point just for a second? It says here in the same yearbook, just a little bit smaller paragraph below, it says:

“A new series of terrorist attacks in border areas originating mainly in Jordan and Syria and later also in Lebanon, began during the year.”

Now, this is back in 65.

Caller 1: Of course, this is true. I was in Israel last spring. I was shooting a film there. And part of my filming was along the Lebanese border. There was an old synagogue about three miles from the border. Just about three hours after I had passed there and done my work, a mine was blown up. Now, this was way over, way over near the Western, near the Mediterranean Sea, just south of the Lebanese border.

Now, for any Jordanian or Syrian to have been able to go all the way from there east of the Jordan to plant that mine would have been impossible. This was a Lebanese mine. And there have been incidents from Lebanon time after time after time! The Israeli intelligence is excellent! As a matter of fact the Jordanians have just today hunt two spies, or they call them spies who are spying for Israel, if you can imagine that.

So the Israeli intelligence is pretty good. When they say that they know what’s going on inside Lebanon, I’m pretty sure that they know.

[54:56]

Ernst Zundel: Yeah, I agree with you.

Caller 1: Okay?

Ernst Zundel: That’s a good thing to say about Israel?

Caller 1: Well, you’re absolutely impossible! Here you have a country. You know, I feel, when I read my, I don’t understand it when I read my Bible, I feel embarrassed about something that the Israelites did 2,000 years ago. I say:

“Why should my people have behaved like that?”

You know, I’m not really guilty, but I feel sorry that they should have. That it shouldn’t be one of our traits. Here you have a people in the Middle East whose only existence., … Now, I’m not a Zionist, that’s why I’m saying this. Whose existence, Israel is due solely at this point in history. Who knows when they might have created, if at all! At this point in history, it’s due solely to the behaviour of your people! You see, and you have the gall, the chutzpah to come along on a public show and to make criticism of them, why they’re there they shouldn’t have been there in the first place or something else.

Ernst Zundel: Did I say that?

Caller 1: Well, you certainly suppose that from the way you talk.

Radio Host: Well, again, you see, the caller accused you of hearing what you want to hear before, and this is evidence of it. He never did say that.

Ernst Zundel: I would be perfectly happy to give you the Arab case. What they say:

“Why you shouldn’t be there, if you want to.”

Radio Host: Well, I don’t know if any of you are listening on my Saturday morning program. Late in the program, we did get someone who outlined it on Viewpoint Tonight. If any of you are watching, it was outlined again. There are three sides to this story. There’s the Israeli side, the Arab side, and the truth!

Caller 1: Well, of course, that doesn’t necessarily follow. It’s possible that one of the two sides is true.

Radio Host: Unfortunately, no. This is, it’s just like in the case of a divorce or anything else. There’s his side, there’s her side, and then there’s the truth!

Caller 1: That’s very clever. But in an actual situation where you have two antagonists, it’s very possible that one of the side is more right than the other.

Radio Host: According to whom, though? You see, according to the Israelis, they’re right. The Arabs are wrong. According to the Arabs, they’re right. The Israelis are wrong.

Now, I’m not saying to be objective. I do not believe anyone can be objective. And I don’t care who says that you can be objective in this case. All I say is that you should be fair!

This is why I am accused by Arabs of being anti-Arab and I’m accused by Israelis of being anti-Israeli.

Caller 1: That’s quite unfair to you because you have to be fair as a moderator and present both sides of the coin. I can understand the Arab point of view, although I think it’s wrong.

Radio Host: Yeah. But on this issue, I’m the only host of a programme on this station to my knowledge that is getting threats against my life and so on over this issue.

Caller 2: It won’t come from me. I think you’re pretty good.

Caller 1: What I was going to say is this. If you take the Israeli and the Arab position, the Israelis have nowhere else to go. There’s some suggestion made that on the part of so-called anti-zionist and some Arab books I’ve read and articles that the European jews. Let me state now several things here, that the European jews who are now in Israel who came from Eastern Europe should go back since they’re not Mediterranean, but they’re probably descended from the Khazari who were a Turkish people in the Crimea 1300 years ago. That they’re really Europeans, blue eyed, blonde, so they shouldn’t be in Israel at all! You can well imagine this kind of a suggestion that Ben Gurion, who was born in Russia, that the Russians would let him back into Russia.

In other words, he’s going to stay there. Certainly the Israeli disciples who were born there are going to stay there.

And can you imagine the Yemenites who were born in [word unclear] to go back there? And the Egyptians to go back to Egypt? So it’s not very likely to happen.

Ernst Zundel: May I just come in here?

Caller 1: Let me just finish that. So the Israelis, when they say they are going to stay, they’re going to stay.

That’s one side of the coin. You can believe that’s their point of view and I can see their point of view and I don’t see how anyone else can. I mean, what’s wrong with that point of view?

But then you get the Arab side of it which says they’re going to drive them into the sea, get rid of them! Can that be correct as well? How can it?

Ernst Zundel: Well, can I come into the point here?

Caller 1: Yeah.

Ernst Zundel: According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume 4, Pages 1 to 5, it deals with what you just outlined, the Khazars.

Caller 1: The Khazaris, yeah.

Ernst Zundel: Right. And it says in there:

“That the Khazar Empire, it was founded by Asiatic Mongol people in the first year after the birth of Christ and existed till about the 14th century.”

As you said. But it had its peak in the seventh and eighth century. These people were heathen and they’re converted to Judaism.

Caller 1: That’s true. Okay, so what’s that got to do with the Israelis right now? And the Mediterranean in 1969.

Ernst Zundel: This is on which much of the Arab argument is based on. If you had heard the UN debate.

Caller 1: Yeah, but you see, you’ve got to start from where you are. You can’t start from where you were 500 years ago. The Israelis are now. What is going to happen to Ben Gurion, for example? Would he go back to Russia?

[1:00:19]

Ernst Zundel: No, no. May I make a point here, a philosophic point, if I may?

Caller 1: Yeah. Okay.

Ernst Zundel: So the Arabs and [word unclear] that was speaking at the United Nations, he was horrified over CBC at the time of the Arab-Israeli war. He said precisely that.

In other words, he said:

“The Khazars were converted to Judaism or what was called then Talmudism.”

And like, …

Caller 1: Watch, watch it. What’s Talmudism? There’s no such thing. Just stick to what you know.

Ernst Zundel: Look, I’m quoting the Jewish Encyclopedia, volume 4 pages one to five, …

Caller 1: Talmudism? Okay.

Ernst Zundel: In the seventh century, Judaism. It wasn’t called Judaism. It was called Talmudism.

Caller 1: Oh, come on! I don’t know who wrote that, but this is all nonsense!

Radio Host: All right. Who wrote the Jewish Encyclopedia?

Ernst Zundel: I suppose a couple of anti-semites!

Radio Host: [chuckling]

Caller 1: So what? They disappeared. They disappeared in the 14th century. What’s that got to do with the German jews?

Ernst Zundel: They didn’t disappear. That’s precisely the point!

Caller 1: Of course they became Christians. They were absorbed into the Russian Empire.

Ernst Zundel: They didn’t become Christians.

Caller 1: Where are they?

Ernst Zundel: They were spread all over the Soviet Union, all over the Balkans. And this is why you have such a big amount of Eastern European jews. They are called the Khazars. And do you know, difference between the Sephardic and Ashkenazis?

Caller 1: The Khazars, …

Ernst Zundel: The total percent, the [word unclear] state. And the Jewish Encyclopedia has a map in the book. 80% of the world’s jewish population today are Khazars. In other words, they are converted!

Caller 1: What are you talking about?

Ernst Zundel: Precisely. That’s what the Arabs are saying.

Therefore. Just a minute now. Look, this is the argument. You have to look at their argument and you have to look at your argument and then we can arrive at something. That’s why the Arabs say that, …

Caller 1: Well, the Arabs don’t know what they’re talking about and you don’t know what you’re talking about. Because, … Let’s forget about it. Let’s forget about it!

[1:02:21]

END

top

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 11,313

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Fri, May 2, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 62/62 mins. Transcript Quality = 4/5.

Joel Davis – What Did the Anzacs Fight For? – Apr 24, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:20:32 +0000

Joel Davis

What Did the Anzacs Fight For?

Thu, Apr 24, 2025

[In this Apr 24, 2025 livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss Anzac Day and its history:

They emphasise the importance of attending Dawn Services on Anzac Day

Blair is wearing sunglasses due to an eye infection

They discuss how the Anzacs fought for a “White Australia” in World War I

“Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister in the First World War, when he addressed the nation and he was basically asking people to sign up to go and fight, he said, ‘I bid thee, go and fight for White Australia in France’.” (10:00)

They talk about Australia’s fears of Japanese expansion in the early 20th century

Australia joined WWI to secure British dominance in Asia and maintain the White Australia Policy

Discussion of Billy Hughes’ role at the Treaty of Versailles in defending the White Australia Policy (20:00)

The RSL (Returned and Services League) strongly supported the White Australia Policy until the 1980s

Debate over whether every individual soldier was consciously fighting for White Australia (30:00)

“White Australia was the central animating concept of Federation. It was the central animating concept of World War I.”

They discuss a quote from Billy Hughes about Australia’s destiny and “banishing” Aboriginal people (40:00)

Conversation about how they developed their views on racial inequality

Discussion of Australia’s involvement in World War II, primarily as a “race war” against Japan (50:00)

Britain’s decisions in WWII led to the decline of the British Empire (55:00)

Criticism of how Anzac Day is commemorated today compared to the past (60:00)

“When we win, Anzac Day is going to be like it used to be again. The people will be inspired again.”

Discussion of a recent incident where Matt Trihey disrupted a political meeting (friends of the ABC) in Melbourne (70:00)

Criticism of media coverage of the incident (75:00)

They discuss the “gynocracy” and how it affects society and politics (80:00)

“We live in a society where emotions rule over reason.” (82:00)

Anecdotes about things being banned in primary school

Discussion of men’s need for competition and outlets for energy

Criticism of men who joke about being “domesticated” by their wives (88:00)

They encourage listeners to protest if there’s a “Welcome to Country” at Anzac Day services (90:00)

Discussion of Gerard Rennick and encouragement to vote for him in Queensland (92:00)

Final encouragement to attend Anzac Day services and treat it as a “religious holiday”

“Make tomorrow venerate tomorrow. Make treat tomorrow like a religious holiday. That’s what it is.”

– KATANA]

https://rumble.com/v6si5mt-the-enemy-is-weaker-than-you-think.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis

follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

https://x.com/joeldavisx

Published on Thu, Apr 24, 2025

Description

1:34:46
Enable
What did the ANZACs fight for?
Joel Davis
6.08K followers
118
2
Repost
Comments
Streamed on:
Apr 24, 6:35 am EDT
4.31K
News
Republican Politics
Joel Davis Blair Cottrell Thomas Sewell Jacob Hersant National Socialist Network
my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis
follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell
follow Tom on telegram: https://t.me/tomsewelluncensored
Show less
10 Comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 16,238 – Duration: 95 mins)

Joel Davis: Okay, we are live. It is Anzac Day, eve, 24th of April, 2024 [2025]. And a stream for you this evening, a regular Thursday night stream. But we’re going to talk a bit about history tonight. We’re going to talk a bit about the history of our great nation, because that’s what we should all be thinking about and preparing ourselves to be focusing upon tomorrow morning when all of you, all of you better be getting up early, before the crack of dawn and getting down to a Dawn Service, whether it be in the city, whether it be your local Dawn Service! One day a year to get out of bed early and get down there and remember and venerate our fallen ancestors who paid the ultimate sacrifice to secure this continent for the White men! Let their sacrifice not be in vain. But it starts with venerating the ancestors in the here and now, if we’re ever going to ensure that. But we’re going to get into that.

But first, my esteemed colleague, Blair Cottrell. He’s looking a bit like a rock star from the early 90s. I just hope that he hasn’t gone on heroin or something. He’s looking a little bit heroin chic. I mean, not skinny heroin chic, but the sunglasses on at night, so it’s a good look though, it’s fresh!

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t usually do this, but a couple of days ago I noticed my eye was irritated. Didn’t think much of it. Then it got worse and then it got worse. And now it looks like this. See that? [take sunnies off] I saw a doctor and apparently it’s some sort of cellulitis of the skin in the eyelid, which is a relatively serious infection. I don’t know how I got it. I don’t remember being bitten by anything. Maybe I just got unlucky somehow.

So taking antibiotics, unfortunately. I don’t like to take antibiotics, but there’s some circumstances where it’s necessary to take antibiotics. I know that I’ve had deep tissue infections on a couple of occasions. Really, if not for modern medicine, I would probably be dead because an infection would have got me by now. And I was told that an infection like this, if gone untreated, can actually cause permanent blindness. So thank God that modern medicine exists. Not everything about modernity is bad, I guess. But I’ll be wearing the sunglasses for the rest of the stream because it just looks terrible. I’m not really confident about being on camera with an eye like that, so you’ll have to enjoy the Sunnies, guys. I’m not on cocaine! I haven’t spiralled out of control. Still here. I’m still me.

Joel Davis: That was a nice cope story, but, I mean, we all know that Blair’s missus packs a punch. And you know, when you talk back, you better watch out!

So we’re feeling for you, Blair, and just remember that you can get help. There is a domestic violence hotline.

Blair Cottrell: Not for man! There’s no help for men, bro! Everyone knows it. Even the lawyers know it. You go into court for a domestic violence dispute and you’re a man, you have no rights! [chuckling] Everyone knows that. So why lie?

Come on, let’s be honest here!

Joel Davis: Anyways, so I guess let’s get into the show. I’m going to try and do this show in a streamlined fashion this evening because we’ve got to get up early in the morning to get down to the Dawn Service. Which I reiterate, if you don’t get up early tomorrow morning and go down to the Dawn Services – this is for the Australians in the audience – and I think in New Zealand, do Anzac Day in New Zealand the same as us? [It’s the same day] I presume that they do.

Blair Cottrell: Almost certainly! It stands for Australian, New Zealand Army Corps, so almost certainly they would do it.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I presume that they do. I don’t know if they have a different day. I don’t know enough. Maybe if you’re a Kiwi, maybe you could let us know what you do over there.

But if you’re an Aussie, you better be out of bed 5am and you better be down at that Dawn Service! Because think about what they did for us and all you have to do is get out of bed early one day a year. It’s really not that much to ask.

But yeah, I want to talk about history tonight and I want to talk about what the Anzacs actually fought for. Because there’s a lot of misrepresentation that occurs at this time of year.

On Australia Day, the enemy is willing to openly admit that this country was founded by the White man for the White man and condemn it as such, and go on about colonialism and the poor abos and blah, blah, blah, as we’re all familiar with. But on Anzac Day, they take a different approach, tack. Because they know if they were going to on the sacrifices of the ancestors at wartime that that wouldn’t go down with the population. We are not that demoralised. You know, they’re barely, they can’t even really cancel Australia Day effectively. We talked about that on Australia Day, how Australia Day is having a resurgence in popularity precisely because of the attacks being levelled by our political enemies upon that day.

But on Anzac Day, they try to subvert it. They try to present the Anzacs:

“They fought for multiculturalism, they fought for against fascism and communism, for freedom. And all this kind of stuff.”

But it’s bullshit! It’s bullshit! If you know anything about history, it’s bullshit!

And what the Anzacs fought for in World War I, because it’s only really proper to talk about the Anzacs in the First World War, because in the other World Wars we were fighting more as Australia, or in World War II we were fighting as Australians, and in Korea and Vietnam and so on, we were fighting as Australians. But in World War I they were fighting for a White Australia, and in World War II they were fighting for a White Australia. And these are really the decisive wars that everyone is really thinking about.

[06:10]

And even in these wars against Korea and Vietnam, against communism, they were fighting to preserve a White Australia. We still had the White Australia Policy, and they were trying to put up a defence against the spread of communism in our region.

So the men that died in these wars, whether you agree with the overarching politics of these wars, which obviously there’s a lot to discuss in that regard, that’s what they were fighting for! And they said it explicitly. And when it comes to World War I and World War II, the Prime Minister himself said it explicitly! Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister in the First World War, when he addressed the nation and he was basically asking people to sign up to go and fight, he said:

“I bid thee, go and fight for White Australia in France!”

He didn’t say:

“Go fight for Australia in France!”

He didn’t say:

“Go fight for the British Empire in France!”

He said:

“Go and fight for White Australia in France!”

And that might seem maybe a little bit strange to people. What could he possibly mean by that? Why was White Australia up for, threatened by events in Europe? And there’s a long version of the story, but I’ll start with the shorter version. The basic version is this.

Australia at that time, obviously a very young country, but only been federated in 1901. About three years after we federated, the British Empire entered into an alliance with the Japanese. And the Japanese were an emerging power in the Asian region. They started building up a big navy. And the British, which at the time had the best navy in the world, and the best shipbuilders in the world, were actually helping the Japanese to build up their navy. As part of this alliance, the British saw fit to make an alliance with Japan because that would then basically take some of the pressure off them trying to command the seas of East Asia if they were allied with the pre-eminent Asian power. And there was a lot of competition at that time for control in East Asia. The Germans were trying to get established here. You had the French, I’m talking about East Asia or the East in general. The French and other European powers were involved, and the British wanted to maintain dominance.

So there was an alliance with Japan. It was widely criticised, but it was ultimately in Australia because of the basically the fear that it would force us to cuck on the White Australia Policy. Because the Japanese did not appreciate the White Australia Policy. They said:

“How dare you lump us in with blacks and Indians and these lesser races. We are Japanese, we’re a proud race, we shouldn’t be excluded from immigration to Australia on the account of being an inferior race.”

And the response at the time, actually by Deakin, who was a founding father of our country and Prime Minister, second Prime Minister of Australia, was to say that:

“Oh, we don’t want you here precisely because we respect you as a race, precisely because we think if we were to let you in, you could take over.”

But anyway, we obviously secured the White Australia Policy, but the British made us kind of tone it down basically not to offend the sensibilities of the Japanese. And so there was a resentment on that basis and a fear of Japanese expansion.

And then in 1905, the Japanese did what at that time was unthinkable. They defeated a European power in a war. They went to war with Russia and they defeated Russia in 1905! And that shocked the world. It was the first time a non-White country had defeated a White country in a war in all of modern history. And so that sent shockwaves through the world that, well, perhaps the White man won’t just be able to rule the world carte blanche with no resistance.

So this struck fear into the hearts of Australians in general because the idea was, well, the Japanese turns expansionist power. A few years later, they conquered Korea. Fears increased.

Now, of course, the British Empire had a formal alliance with Japan. But they said:

“Well, what happens if the British Empire collapses? Or what happens if that alliance collapses and instead the Japanese ally with the Germans and then they come together to defeat the British Empire, then what will happen to Australia?”

The fear was that if the British Empire was to lose its dominance in the region, that we would ultimately fall under the control of these powers and then potentially non-Whites would be able to enter our continent, and the White Australia Policy would collapse.

And so all the rhetoric and all of the political machinations at that time was building a defence force in Australia that could defend Australia, but also propping up the British Empire because Australia had such a small population so that the British Empire could defend Australia and therefore defend a White Australia. Because if we were to fall under the control of some other empire, they could force us to open our borders and bring in their merchants and bring in their workers and so on and we would lose the continent to other races, literally. And this was explicitly, I’m not just saying this is what all the newspapers were saying. This is what all the politicians were saying. This was our primary concern politically in this country at the beginning of our history.

And there were a lot of elements in Australian politics, particularly in the Labor Party at the time, who were upset at the British Empire, who thought that the British Empire, you know, was basically taken over by jews, bankers and so on. They didn’t give a fuck about Australia. That they had this kind of multiracial, international corporate empire that was ruled by not the almighty dollar at that time, because it wasn’t the dollar but the almighty pound. And that they weren’t concerned about the racial future of Australia. But nevertheless they recognised that because we were of the British race, we were part of the British Empire, that it was our best bet at securing our position in the world.

[12:13]

And so they were willing to go – I mean, Billy Hughes was Labor, he was a Labor man – they were willing to go and fight for the British Empire to ensure they won the First World War, to ensure that the British Empire remained strong, to ensure that it continued dominating East Asia, to ensure that we could continue having a White Australia Policy. That’s why we got involved in World War I. It wasn’t just because of some kind of like British patriotism or loyalty to the Empire. It was a pragmatic decision to secure a White Australia.

Of course, people felt good feelings towards the British Empire. We were of the British race, of the British stock. But there was also a strong sense of nationalism in Australia all the way back at that time, a keen sense of what was in our interest as a people.

And so that was what was determined that we have to go and fight to secure the future of the British Empire and also to win the Right by participating in that war to have a say about the direction of the Empire. And what Billy Hughes did at The Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I and the during the establishment of the League of Nations, is he pushed very hard against members of the alliance, such as the Japanese and others who wanted to push for, … League of Nations, by the way, was the prototype of the UN. It was the first attempt at creating a UN. And there was a proposal put forward by the Allies that won World War I to establish this prototype of the UN called the League of Nations, to basically establish a principle that racially discriminatory immigration policies would be abolished basically in the world. That this was horrible and racist and so on all the way back then. And Billy Hughes pushed very hard against that. He said:

“We came in, we had 65,000 men sacrifice their lives to ensure this victory. We are not giving up our White Australia Policy.”

And we successfully won. We convinced the Americans sided with us, the British sided with us and ultimately that provision was taken out. The Japs weren’t happy about it, but they didn’t have enough sway. So Billy Hughes came back to Australia announcing victory:

“What a great victory that we’d achieved!”

And also New Guinea, today known as Papua New Guinea, was under German control. And this caused a lot of concerns back in those days. We also secured that under our control at that time.

So the idea was not simply about defending the British Empire because we loved the King. And we were Anglo Saxons or something. It was a specific concern with Australian national interests and how to secure this continent for the White man. And everyone knew it! And when the soldiers came back and they formed what became known as the RSL, which is the largest body by far to represent veterans that have fought for Australia and fought for the Empire. They came back to Australia, they set up the RSL [Returned and Services League (of Australia)] and immediately became the strongest lobby group in an already very racist country for the White Australia Policy. With the first president, second president, third president of the RSL and so on, making constant statements that their members fought and died or fought and sacrificed because their members obviously were still alive and their comrades who died for a White Australia to secure basically Anglo supremacy in the world, and to secure this continent for the White man. That’s why they fought. And that any kind of acquiescence on the White Australia Policy they would consider a betrayal. And they reaffirmed this after World War II.

And in fact, the RSL was the last major public organisation in Australia to abandon explicit advocacy for the White Australia Policy. It wasn’t until the late 80s, the late 1980s, long after the White Australia Policy was abandoned by the government that the RSL finally abandoned its advocacy for the White Australia Policy.

So if you see Anzac Day ceremonies tomorrow, they try to tell you that:

“They fought for multiculturalism and against Nazism!”

They did fight against the Germans, they did fight against the National Socialists. And they were misguided, you could say, ultimately, and putting their allegiance to the Empire, because the Empire in the Second World War ultimately betrayed us and it collapsed. It betrayed itself and collapsed.

But that’s why they fought. That’s what their sacrifice was about. Every single man on that battlefield, that’s what he was fighting for. That’s why he went to France, that’s why he went to Gallipoli, that’s why he went to Kokoda*. So that needs to be held in full consciousness and ruminated upon.

[* The Kokoda Track campaign or Kokoda Trail campaign was part of the Pacific War of World War II. The campaign consisted of a series of battles fought between July and November 1942 in what was then the Australian Territory of Papua. It was primarily a land battle, between the Japanese South Seas Detachment under Major General Tomitarō Horii and Australian and Papuan land forces under command of New Guinea Force. The Japanese objective was to seize Port Moresby by an overland advance from the north coast, following the Kokoda Track over the mountains of the Owen Stanley Range, as part of a strategy to isolate Australia from the United States. Wikipedia]

[16:53]

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s reasonable to assume that every fighting soldier was conscientiously engaging in the war? That whatever it is, they were fighting in World War I, World War II, because they were fighting for White Australia? Every Australian soldier actually was fully aware and conscious of their ethnicity and they were fighting to defend their ethnicity? Or would you say that maybe war propaganda plays a part in the reason for why they’re fighting? They might have been spelled by some series of slogans produced by the government. They might have been made to hate the enemy. They might be in it for glory, for honour. They might just be in it because they’re bored and they want to do something with their lives that’s interesting. I think there’s probably a complex of reasons. I understand what you’re saying. I understand that the Statesmen who were in favour of the war, they obviously had their reasons, which were nationalistic in essence. But I think the individual soldier, he fought for his own reasons a lot of the time.

However, it’s my understanding, or it’s my feeling rather, that there was a collective, how should I describe it? Some sort of collective understanding that was unspoken, that the Australians understood that they were a specific ethnic group, that they were a certain type of people, an extension of the British colonies, but still their own kind nonetheless, and that they were fighting to defend their kind, they were engaged in the war for that purpose, collectively.

Yet on an individual level, if you were to interview each soldier, if that was possible, for argument’s sake, I’m sure they would give a series of explanations as to why they were fighting.

But I think the collective reason why they were fighting would have been in for the maintenance or expansion of their own ethnic presence, power, that kind of thing, defending their own kind I think. What do you reckon?

Joel Davis: Well at the end of the day though, like these politicians that were talking about these ideas, they were elected, they were running on these ideas. They were saying:

“We must defend a White Australia. This is what we need to do to prepare to fight and defend it.”

And they were voted into government, you know, according to those statements they were making to the public.

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, isn’t it?

Joel Davis: Australians were not forced, Australians were not forced to go and fight. They were not forced. There wasn’t conscription in World War I. They signed up voluntarily to go.

Blair Cottrell: What I was saying is, isn’t it curious that the phrase “White Australia” right now would be something that a lot of people wouldn’t be comfortable using in regular conversation because they’ll be accused of racism or something worse. But less than 100 years ago maybe even 50 or 60 years ago, that phrase was just commonly used and understood as an obviously present and correct thing. Like everybody understood that White Australia existed. White Australia was a real cultural, ethnic identity and it was who we are. It’s who we are as a people. In such a short time people are now have been, or people have been made to feel uncomfortable and frightened to even use that phrase. It doesn’t take very long, does it with effective propaganda to turn a people against themselves? To make them too afraid to establish any right to exist, too afraid to fight for their own self-determination.

Joel Davis: That phrase White Australia was the central animating concept of federation. It was the central animating concept of World War I. It was a central animating concept of the first half of this federated nation’s existence, in politics. The White Australia Policy was the policy of the government that was most in concern for the people and for the politicians! It was the defining principle of our country. It wasn’t just an idea, it wasn’t just something that people liked or sometimes talked about. It was an obsession!

And those men gave their blood. They died for that ideal. Ultimately that was what it was explained to them that the war was about. In all of the, all of the media publications. All these publications that we still know today, like the Sydney Morning Herald and the Melbourne Age and all these things, they used to be virulently White nationalist racist publications. They used to be! They used to talk, like The Noticer today has tamer language than what the Sydney Morning Herald had in like 1910. That’s just the reality and that’s how the culture was in those days.

And the so-called Anzac Myth. People talk about that, how there was a the soldiers were described rather poetically by journalists and other writers in the Australian press during and after the First World War. That ANZAC myth was fundamentally racist. It was describing the Australian soldiers essentially as great eugenic specimens, talking about how they were the superior Anglo Saxon and like, comparing them as a stock to the British in favourable terms and so on, and describing how on the battlefield they showed our racial fortitude was superior to the enemy and this kind of thing.

And when Australian politicians were justifying certain policies, like policies to make military training compulsory nationally and things like that, they would come to the people and say:

“If you are a proud White man, how could you oppose my policy?”

You know, they would literally appeal to you on the basis of White nationalism, on the basis of your, like, Aryan honour to justify their policies to you. That’s how politicians used to talk to the people in those days.

[22:49]

So when you read Australian history, you realise this country was more racist than like even probably any country in the world at that time. And there was this pressing concern. I just posted on my Telegram this quote from Prime Minister Billy Hughes. He was our wartime Prime Minister in the First World War. And Billy Hughes, by the way, was a full on Darwinist, basically. He had a dog-eat-dog, highly racial, like a kind of view of history as racial competition. You either fight for your survival and assert your supremacy or you get crushed by other races. That’s how he saw the world. It was very Hitlerian, proto-Hitlerian, you could say. And in some, in some ways you could say Billy Hughes was more savage than Hitler in some of his statements and speeches on this, on these issues.

But this is a quote from Billy Hughes. This is during a ceremony that was conducted in 1913, a year before the beginning of World War I, when they started building Canberra. Because at the beginning of Australia, Canberra wasn’t built yet. At the beginning of Federation, there was a dispute between Sydney and Melbourne as to who got to be the capital.

And so the compromise was struck to build the capital city in Canberra for the purpose of serving as the nation’s capital, to kind of assuage this conflict between the two major cities, right? And Billy Hughes said this at this, at the ceremony where the foundational stone of Canberra was being laid. When they started building Canberra, to quote:

“We are here so far as we can to mould the destinies of a nation. The deity has fashioned us out for this purpose from the beginning. We were destined to have our own way from the beginning and America, two nations that have always had their way, for they killed everybody to get it. I declare to you that in no other way shall we be able to come to our own except by preparing to hold that which we have. Now, we are here as visible signs of a continent. We have a great future before us. The people are incapable of nourishing abstract ideals. They must have a symbol. And here we have a symbol of nationality. The first historic event in the history of the Commonwealth we are engaged in today without the slightest trace of that race we have banished from the face of the earth (meaning the Aboriginals). We must not be too proud, lest we should too in time disappear.”

This is how the leader of our country thought before World War I. You know, tomorrow if they do a Welcome to Country, that wasn’t what they fought for. The man who led us, who led the Anzacs into the First World War, said:

“I bid thee go fight for White Australia in France. We have banished the Aboriginals from the face of the earth. Let us struggle so that we are not banished like them.”

That was how this man thought. That’s how this man spoke and addressed our nation. That was the man that we elected to rule us, to run us during that war. And who was celebrated as a hero, a national hero at the time.

So that’s what we need to have consciousness of around this. Like this is not up for debate. Like it is black and white. The Anzacs fought for a White Australia!

Blair Cottrell: Did you ever believe in racial equality at any point in your life?

Joel Davis: I think when I was young, growing up, I did kind of have a default egalitarianism of sorts where I thought:

“Okay, well, you know, fairness would dictate that every people deserve a certain dignity or whatever.”

But I did, as I started to get into my teens, I did become conscious of the fact that there were relations of supremacy and superiority. And I did remember feeling pride from basically the first time I thought about it, in the fact that my race was clearly such a powerful and strong race in world history and in contemporary history that we were all kind of top of the food chain or it felt like we were top of the food chain. And I did also remember becoming conscious of the jews around that time because there was a lot of discussion of Israel and so on we’re talking about this is during like the Iraq war and zionism. And I kind of became vaguely familiar of like conspiracy theories around the Rothschild banking family and so on.

And I remember thinking:

“Okay, well that kind of puts the whole Holocaust thing in perspective. Like they said that Hitler was trying to take over the world and the guy, the guys he decided to take on were the jews. And apparently these jews run all these banks. And now we’re our whole like global superpowers are fighting to defend their country, Israel. What is that all about?”

And so that did make me kind of start to see, … I remember feeling like, okay, maybe that would justify, like I didn’t at that time I didn’t realise the Holocaust was fake, but I started to think:

“Okay, maybe that would kind of justify doing something like that if you felt like that was your main competitor for supremacy.”

But these were kind of vague thoughts. Like it took me multiple years to kind of formulate them more ideologically because the conditioning is very strong in our culture to think in terms of egalitarianism and that like supremacy is in a certain sense immoral.

I just kind of thought about it at that time more as like a kind of, from a realist, pragmatic standpoint, maybe there are necessary evils that you can sympathise with. And you know, in my late teens I became familiar with like Nietzsche’s philosophy and so on and started thinking about things more in those terms. But it probably wasn’t until I was 19 or so that I really fully internalised that as a worldview and came to that like ultimate kind of conclusion of thinking about the world in terms of that like kind of inequality is just nature and it’s just reality. And that either you’re the top of the chain or you eat shit! And it’s much better to be top of the chain than to be eating shit!

[29:01]

Blair Cottrell: I remember I used to get angry at people for being racist, like in primary school and early high school days.

And I thought that was a good thing for me to do because I was standing up for what was right, what was fair. Because as you said, the conditioning was strong. That’s what I had been conditioned to believe was right. But I started to see the obvious realities of racial differences and even genetic differences between people of the same race. And I realised that people aren’t equal. I realised that pretty quickly.

But one thing that always, because I went through, so I’m just getting a message from someone. I went through a stage where I actually felt like White people didn’t have culture. I felt like only dark skinned people were cultured. And White people just didn’t really have anything like that. Because I wasn’t thinking about what culture was. I didn’t have a good understanding of culture. To me, culture meant music and family values and doing things together as a family and painting your face and having all of these kind of spiritual, greater meanings to family traditions and shit like that!

I didn’t see culture as great stone structures. I didn’t see the kind of culture produced by the race to whom I belonged. And I can recall, I always was curious about the Nazis, because whenever I saw footage of the Nazis, the Germans, on History Channel, I heard how crazy and evil they were, yet so many people followed them! And they looked so polished, they look so good!

And so the explanation didn’t really match the aesthetic that was being presented to me on these channels. So I was always curious to learn more about the Nazis. But whenever I tried to, there wasn’t really a lot of information there. It was just like, these guys are evil, these guys are crazy! Especially if you tried to get your information from Hollywood entertainment you weren’t really getting much there.

Joel Davis: Well, let’s talk about World War II, actually, because obviously on Anzac Day, we don’t just venerate people from the First World War, but also the Second World War. And I think that’s important because people say:

“Well, you know, Joel, you’re a National Socialist, you’re obviously sympathetic towards the Germans, yet you’re venerating men who fought many of them against Germans, a lot of them against the Japanese, who were German allies in the Second World War. And ultimately you think the Second World War was a horrible thing, the way that it went and that the Germans lost and so on.”

And that requires an explanation, perhaps, and we’ve talked about it before, but I think on a day like this, it’s important to discuss this.

Number one, recall what I was saying about World War I. The animating concern of the First World War for Australians was the Japanese. And the Japanese weren’t even our enemy during World War I. They were our ally. But we saw that the Japanese would expand and become an increasingly powerful force in the world. And that was why we chose to ally ourselves with the British. Well, we were already in the British Empire, but why we chose to commit so intensely to the British Empire to the point that we sent 65,000 of our own sons to go and die for the Empire in the First World War, in the beaches of Turkey and in the trenches of France.

And the Second World War vindicated these fears. Right? Because what was the Second World War? Well, the Second World War, it started in Europe, in 1939, but arguably it started in Asia in 1933 when the Japanese invaded China. And the Japanese were rampaging their way through China, through the 1930s. And this was setting off massive alarm bells in Australia. And ultimately, of course, the Japanese ended up forging an alliance with the Germans.

And so this very much factored into our enthusiasm to fight in the Second World War, our concern that if, well, if the British Empire was defeated in the Second World War, which ultimately it was, we can get on to that, but it was defeated by the Germans in the Second World War, that basically we would be left defenceless against this radically expansionary Japanese Empire that was allied with what would have been the German victors. That concern is what inspired men to fight.

And ultimately, from a bird’s eye view, it was incorrect for us to fight against the Germans. The betrayal happened really in London. The British should never have gone to war with the Germans. The Germans wanted an alliance with the British. And then even after the war began, they also wanted to make peace with Britain and were rejected many, many times.

And that ultimately was destructive to the British Empire. The ultimate victors of World War II was not Britain. On paper, it was Britain, but it wasn’t. On paper it says that they won, but look at the practicalities of what happened. The British Empire fell apart immediately after World War II at the hands of the Americans and the Soviets, their so-called allies, during World War II. During World War II, the Americans extended massive loans to the British which they made them repay in full. They extended massive loans to the Soviet Union, their supposed communist enemy in the Cold War. They didn’t make them repay, they didn’t make them pay back one cent in order to fight the Germans.

There was an intent by the Americans to use the conditions of World War II and kind of World War I as well, actually, to an extent, but in particular World War II, to basically bankrupt and break up the British Empire and then integrate its remnants into an American led, liberal, democratic international order.

Now moving over to the Pacific, the Japanese were a real threat. They did want to take over our region. I don’t think they wanted to invade Australia directly, but they did attack us. They did bomb Darwin, they did send [mini] submarines into Sydney, they did invade Papua New Guinea, or New Guinea, which was actually our protectorate. So they did attack us. And they also attacked the British Empire and Australian soldiers in Singapore and other places.

[35:27]

So what World War II was primarily for Australians was a race war against Japan to ensure the dominance of the White race over the Asia Pacific region. And ultimately our main ally, and that was the Americans, was the British Empire didn’t have the capacity to defend us. They basically abandoned us in World War II. And we kind of abandoned them largely earlier on in the war. In the early years of the war we went and fought the Germans and the Italians in North Africa on behalf of the British Empire.

But then once the war with Japan kind of began, we pulled our guys out, we said:

“No, we need to bring them home to defend Australia.”

We basically pulled out of the European theatre of the World War and stop really participating in it, brought all the guys back home and just focused on fighting Japan for the rest of the war. We weren’t really involved in the ultimate defeat of the Germans.

So that needs to be also kind of taken into consideration. When we’re venerating our ancestors, we’re venerating mostly from World War II, our ancestors who fought a race war against the Japanese which was a valid race war and a necessary race war in order to preserve our sovereignty. Unfortunately because of basically the traitorous government in Britain which made decisions to the benefit of their jewish financier backers rather than the British Empire itself, they refused peace with Hitler, they refused alliance with Hitler which would have been in their actual geopolitical interest in order to essentially be complicit in the defeat of all European empires including themselves by the communists from the east and the American, like liberals, from across the pond.

And so the British Empire was no more. And now Australia was left even though the Japanese were defeated, we were now left basically dependent upon an American led international order. Basically became part of an American Empire rather than a British Empire.

And due to being part of that American Empire we became infected with all of the ideas that ultimately destroyed and unravelled the White Australia Policy and kind of sent our country on the trajectory that it’s now on today, one of suicidal self destruction!

And the same thing happened to all of America’s so-called allies in Western Europe. Their so-called allies in Western Europe also have gone on this suicidal trajectory of self destruction as is America itself because it’s ruled by a kind of anti-White jewish oligarchy.

So World War II in that sense was a mistake. But at the time America seemed like at that time America was a 90% White country. An America that had millions of members in the Ku Klux Klan, who had a racial restrictive immigration policy, who had segregation in the south, because obviously they had black [post —] slave populations, but they had segregation. No one at that time could have foreseen the trajectory that America was on, except maybe like, a few really philosophically wise individuals. But the average person and the average statesman could not have foreseen what would come of America.

And so the decisions that were made at that time by our leadership and the feelings and sentiments of the people and the soldiers at that time, I think, were fundamentally noble and virtuous. These people were not traitors. John Curtin, our prime minister in World War II, he was not a traitor! I think he was sincere, sincerely trying to take the steps that he needed to defend White Australia. And ultimately, when the war with Japan began, he pulled everyone out, all the Aussies, out of the European and African theatre and said:

“You got to get back here and fight to defend White Australia here right now and mobilise the whole country to fight Japan.”

And we emerged victorious with many great military victories over the Japanese, particularly Kokoda, which was particularly impressive. So that’s worthy of remembrance and veneration. Absolutely!

What do you think about that, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: God, I don’t know. Which part?

Joel Davis: Well, World War II in general. Because obviously you share my sympathies towards the Germans under National Socialism, but at the same time, you’ll be remembering our ancestors. I think you have ancestors who served in World War II? I do.

Blair Cottrell: I’m not exactly sure.

Joel Davis: Okay.

[40:10]

Blair Cottrell: As I was saying before, though, I was getting at something. I was saying that, yeah, I felt White people didn’t have a culture, but I was always curious about the Nazis. And I started to learn more about National Socialism by reading Mein Kampf. And I learnt a lot about it. And I had to tell everybody! I had this girlfriend, right? And I wouldn’t shut up! I kept talking about the point of life basically being about breeding up, about enhancing your genetic stock and not degrading it through miscegenation or just genetic downgrading. And we talked a lot about that. I chewed her head off about it a lot. And sometime later, she said to me:

“Look, I agree with you and I understand what you’re saying, and I’m glad that you have taught me about alternative World War II history. I’m glad that we discussed the reality of race and the point of life, as you call it.”

But she said:

“I was happier before.”

She said to me:

“I wish you didn’t tell me these things because I was happier before.”

She said:

“Now I feel like I can see a giant elephant in the room now. I feel like I’m surrounded by retards, like dysgenic retards, and it’s depressing!”

Yeah? And we parted ways a short time later and I never spoke to her again.

So this is a regular person, a person who’s intelligent enough, a member of Australian society, to understand the reality of race and how important it is not to throw away what you have genetically, ethnically.

But then when she came to understand that, she just acknowledged to me, admitted openly that she was happier before she knew that! The society she grew up in basically pushed the opposite message, and that she felt like an outcast. She felt like she wished she hadn’t been told that. She wished she never had to understand that, because it was depressing for her.

Do you think the average person. This is like the question that I’m getting to. Do you think the average person can be a National Socialist? Do you think they’re capable of enduring what they have to endure? Do you think they need to be a National Socialist in order to vote for a party that represents those ideals? Because I don’t feel they are capable. I don’t feel they have the strength.

I feel like a small leadership group has the strength, but the ordinary people, the masses, they’re neither capable nor willing to be ethnic nationalists. Has there ever been a time in history where the entire country, any country, has been consciously ethnically nationalist, every single member? Or have they just been more concerned about their own personal lives and misgivings? Are they actually geared to participate in politics and philosophy on the level of being a conscious ethnic nationalist? Do they need to be? What do you think?

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, obviously Australia in the first half of the 20th century was a consciously ethnically nationalist people.

Blair Cottrell: Was it, though? Was it, though? Was it, though? Because you go through old footage, there’s old ABC footage, and it’s from like the 60s or something, I think. And even then you’ve got people saying:

“Oh, I’ve got nothing against this race and that race. And a few of them can come in. That’s okay, as long as they’re not intermarrying.”

Joel Davis: That’s in the sixties. So things are starting to change. The television was introduced and the kind of post World War II judeo-American propaganda started getting disseminated and so on, and the culture had shifted quite significantly at that point.

But in the early 20th century I think the culture was very staunchly racialist. The media, the clear political will of the people as represented by who they were voting for and what kind of policies were convincing to the Australian people.

And also the lead up to the Federation of Australia, the Labor movement in this country the political movements in this country in general all geared towards racial preservation. And labour movement was engaged in a lot of industrial action that was basically geared against the use of coloured labour and so on. The public overwhelmingly supported them. When you had kind of race riots and so on, … Because like look at for example the Eureka Stockade*. The Eureka Stockade was essentially like an armed rebellion against the government at the time. The leaders of the Eureka Stockade ultimately were not thrown in prison, they were basically given a slap on the wrist.

[* The Eureka Rebellion was a series of events involving gold miners who revolted against the British administration of the colony of Victoria, Australia, during the Victorian gold rush. It culminated in the Battle of the Eureka Stockade, which took place on 3 December 1854 at Ballarat between the rebels and the colonial forces of Australia. The fighting resulted in an official total of 27 deaths and many injuries, the majority of casualties being rebels. Wikipedia]

And then a whole bunch of them entered politics and got elected into the Parliament and one of them became the Premier of Victoria and then they passed a whole bunch of legislation greatly restricting immigration into the colony of Victoria at the time.

So the people rallied around violent rebels that were opposing the importation of Chinese labour basically. And these policies were also wildly, wildly popular in New South Wales and Queensland, all the other colonies where they experienced non-White immigration.

And then that was the fuel that led to Federation, that was the fuel that led to World War I etc. And the enthusiasm that the people had for these things. When the “Great White Fleet” they called it, which was the American Navy came and toured Australia and visited in a kind of friendly way in 1908 it was greeted by massive crowds. They’re basically described like there’s never been crowds that big in Sydney or Melbourne before to come and see these great ships of the US Navy and then all the speeches that were being given as:

“Look at this great White power from the other side of the Pacific Ocean! Look how exceptional their big ships are. We need to be allied with these, with our kind of Anglo Saxon brothers from across the Pacific against you know, the yellow menace! And what proud, what great White men these people are and what testament to area ingenuity, these great feats of technology are!”

And people were ecstatic about this and it was like a big deal.

[* Great White Fleet – On 20 August 1908 a round the world peace mission by the American fleet arrived in Port Jackson, Sydney. The US navy was on a round the world cruise which had set out eight months earlier on 16 December 1907. The sixteen warships, led by the flagship Connecticut, were painted white to denote peace. They would be known as The Great White Fleet. https://mhnsw.au › stories › general › great-white-fleet]

Can you imagine people acting like that today? No, it was a completely different world back then. When they opened the shrine, …

[46:49]

Blair Cottrell: Do we still have people or do we just have pre-programmed goyim? Is that the problem? Well, think about it. That’s a serious question. The people as thinking, feeling, independent creatures as they were pre-television. Do we still have people like that? Do they still exist? Or are they just morons out there waiting to be told what to do and how to vote? And do we need to adjust ourselves to the receptivity of the moron in order to make any sort of political success? Or are we counting on a people support from a people that are no longer there?

Joel Davis: Well, I think the television definitely radically degraded the consciousness of the masses. I think you can see a massive shift when the television is invented and widely disseminated in the politics of every Western country. And what comes with that you get second wave feminism, you get mass immigration, etc.

Blair Cottrell: And it’s even worse! It’s worse. It’s not just television. Have you, like, Zoomers can’t write. Zoomers cannot write! Have you seen the handwriting? They can’t count money. Like the screen error has made it even worse! Like new generations are even more retarded! They’re kind of more radical because they’re so desensitised, but they’re still more retarded!

So we’re dealing with a different type of humanity than the sort of humanity that accepted ethnic nationalism as self evident. We’re dealing with a completely different type of humanity.

And so I’m not sure whether ethnic nationalism will fly on a large scale. I think Aussie pride might fly or something really simplistic. And you as the leading force, can be an ethnic nationalist organisation with your own extensive philosophy, but the person that you’re trying to appeal to, the sort of human you’re trying to appeal to, isn’t actually capable of understanding anything about ethnic nationalism. They’re capable of being racist a little bit. And maybe you could make them feel more confident about being racist, less afraid of consequences, because that’s what stops them from being racist.

At the end of the day, it’s just fear of consequence. If there wasn’t the applicable or necessary fear of consequence out there in society, people would just be as naturally racist as they’ve always been. It’s fear that stops them from doing that. So you could make them feel more comfortable about being racist. But my gut tells me that the average person out there in society isn’t actually capable of giving themselves over to a conscious ethnic nationalism. But I don’t really think they need to be at the same time.

Joel Davis: Well, the masses don’t necessarily need to be because the masses largely get led around by, … I mean, the masses aren’t really in support of what the government is currently doing either. Most people don’t agree with pretty much all the major policies of the government. Most people are sick of the woke stuff, they’re sick of the transgenderism. Immigration isn’t popular. The policies of the government are not popular and they’re getting less and less popular through time.

And I think as you said, the younger generation, it’s kind of polarising in both directions. But you know, without the television generation, they are a lot less trusting of authority. They’re a lot more kind of open minded to different ideas.

And what we’re seeing in Europe or what we’re seeing in America is that the younger generation is actually extremely Right-wing. So like in America, the younger Zoomers are way more Right-wing than even, than any other generation. Like the age bracket between 18 and, 201 is the most Right-wing of like almost any generation in America at the moment. And also the other thing is that racism and nationalism, these aren’t very complex ideas. Black people, not that smart. Black people are intensely loyal to each other politically.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but that’s because there’s no consequence for not being loyal to each other.

Joel Davis: But that shows that like in principle, like it’s not about the stupidity of the masses or anything, as you said, it’s a social game. So what is going to give White people the confidence to be racist? It’s a real question. It’s not that they’re not capable of racism. It’s actually a natural thing. Or that it wouldn’t be possible.

Blair Cottrell: Less consequence.

Joel Davis: It’s about how do you inspire them, how do you basically give them a sense of permission, or a sense of inspiration or some kind of how do you attract them to the principles of nationalism and racism? That’s the question. And there is a way to do it. There has to be because it’s inherent.

Blair Cottrell: Needs to be something in it for them. They need to benefit from it and not lose. And a result of being racist currently they lose and they lose hard. So if they can benefit from being racist, they’ll do it all day. People are selfish and simple.

Joel Davis: We’re not going to be able to get to the point where people can benefit from being racist until we have a critical mass of people that are willing to suffer. Like you don’t need everyone, you don’t need the like 50% plus one to be willing to suffer for it. We do need a much bigger movement that can sustain and grow to a level where you can start to get, where it can start to actually, socially reward its participants more. We have to make racism fun. We have to make it engaging.

And that’s part of what we’re trying to do with the organisation. Like one of the ambitions is to have a network of gyms and pubs that we control across all Australian cities where young White people can hang out and have community and enjoy themselves and throw parties and throw events constantly that are fun to attend for our people so that they can have a communal and social basis to participate in the movement. Make the movement fun, make the movement engaging, give them something to be in the movement and then they’re going to actually stay in the movement, participate in the movement.

And then on a political level what we’re going to put forward is a whole series of policies that are going to materially make your life a lot better. And the current system is making your life a hell of a lot worse. And it’s only going to get worse and worse! And people are happy to go along with the status quo while there’s a reasonable amount of prosperity and comfort.

[53:09]

But in 10 years time, you think it’s bad now, it’s not really that bad yet. Wait, in 10, 15 years time it’s going to get really bad! People are going to be more and more open minded to a more radical politics and a more radical solution. Also racism is the only thing that’s actually funny anymore. You know, they used to be able to control the population through really good propaganda.

Back in the 80s, the 90s, the quality of Hollywood movies was so high. The quality of, just ZOG slop, music, television, etc., was actually quite high. And so you could just kind of like turn your brain off and just get like sucked into The Matrix of Bread and Circuses so much more easily. The prevailing culture was so much more enjoyable to kind of lose yourself in. It’s no longer the case. They can’t produce good films anymore, they can’t produce good music anymore. They don’t have the same cultural cache or gravitas that they once did.

So the ability to kind of prop up the prevailing like Leftist morality is diminishing. Whilst at the same time if we have the fortitude and we have the ambition and the creativity, we have the ability to create a counterculture that can be quite fun and engaging for the younger generation of Whites who are increasingly disaffected and alienated. I do believe there’s a pathway there to making nationalism fun, to making nationalism enjoyable to make, to activating, to making nationalism amenable to people who have selfish rather than simply selfless, romantic reasons to embrace it.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I sometimes fear becoming an entertainer, though. I sometimes worry that the content I’m making, the effort that I’m making politically, may just be consumed as entertainment by people sitting on their asses scrolling. They might find it amusing and funny, but then they’re just going to scroll to the next thing and it’s just another 15 to 25 second moment in their lives that they feel amused by. And that’s the only purpose that I’m serving in the lives of ordinary people. That’s very cynical of course. There’s probably greater psychological impacts the content has on people, and that’s why we make it, that’s why we put this sort of stuff out there.

But look, I’m especially cranky because I’ve got this eye infection and my whole eye socket’s just throbbing. It’s very painful. So I’m kind of being a cynic tonight. I’m playing devil’s advocate a little bit, so don’t mind me. I’m doing my best not to crack the shits, but Anzac Day tomorrow, we got the Dawn Service in the morning. This is a very significant day for Australians. It’s very special. It’s really helps, or how should I say it, underpins how important ancestral worship is to us. And by us, I don’t just mean Australians, but every member of our race around the world that is related to us in any way, shape or form. That’s if you pay attention.

And Tom Sewell was telling me this today, he’s been telling me for a while, ancestral worship, veneration of the ancestors is kind of integral to our traditions as a people. Whatever country you go to that is a majority White, there is a great deal of respect, admiration and even worship of the ancestors that were the precondition for our existence. Now we are here because of them. And on Anzac Day this year, the message I’d like people to take away, or the feeling I’d like people to experience, is how little your life actually means, is how small your life is in the grand scheme of things.

The fact that we are mortals and we have to die in quite a short time, but that through our deeds and what we choose to believe in our national community, our race can live forever.

And I think that’s the essence of what we’re doing on Anzac Day, when we appreciate the sacrifices that have been made for us in order for us to be here now. Right. We are respecting, venerating, glorifying all of our ancestors that made the greatest sacrifice that serves as the precondition for our presence here now. That’s what Anzac Day means to me.

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And ancestor veneration is basically the ancient religion of the Aryans. You know, the ancient Aryans, they practised in different ways, but they fundamentally practised a whole series of rites and rituals venerating their previous ancestors. They had kind of Patriarchal, patrilineal cults and the development of the pantheon of pagan gods kind of spun out of ancestor worship as its foundation. So it’s actually kind of an organic form of our native spirituality of our distant ancestors.

And when you think about the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne, which is an incredible building that shrine looks kind of like a pagan temple. It has Christian elements in it, but it looks like a pagan temple, you could say. It looks like something out of like ancient Greece or something. And that temple, which is what it is, was built to venerate the ancestors at. Literally it’s called the Shrine of Remembrance by crowdfunding of the veterans of the First World War.

So the Anzacs literally Pooled their cash together and built that. It wasn’t built by the government, it was very carefully designed. And that’s where I’m going to be tomorrow, venerating the ancestors. When that was opened in the early 1930s, over 300,000 people attended!

Now, let me look up. What was the population of Melbourne? I don’t know exactly what was the population of Melbourne?

[59:26]

Blair Cottrell: Only about a million. Less than a million.

Joel Davis: Yeah. In 1932. Let’s have a look.

1932, yeah. It was a bit less than a million. 950,000. So it’s around a million people. So 300,000 people showed up to the opening of the shrine.

So that’s like three out of every ten Melburnians showing up, basically.

Blair Cottrell: Well, they all. I reckon they all had a personal investment in it because the that wasn’t built by the taxpayer, by the government. It was crowdfunded the funds necessary to build the shrine by RSL, I think. And so everyone who attended those 300,000 people were probably all investors. They probably all put money in for it to be built. So it literally is a structure of the people. Like, this is not something the government built, this is something the people put together themselves.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but not just that it’s such an impressive building. It’s such a powerful, potent building. It shows. I mean, a lot of people would have had family members that fought. Almost everyone would have had family members that fought in World War I. A lot of people would have had family members that died in World War I so obviously it was a big deal to them for those reasons. But the big Union Jacks, I’ve seen the picture they have in underneath the shrine of like, the first. I don’t know if it was Remembrance Day or what, the first kind of big kind of opening, ceremonial opening of the shrine. It was a big event, and it was about venerating those who had given their blood for the Empire. That’s how people used to think back then. It was the biggest deal. Nothing was a bigger deal than that.

And that was when we had a country that had a robust White Australia Policy. That was when we had a country that was a real country because those were people that were conscious of their mortality, conscious of the fact that anything you have in this world you have to fight for that. Blood is what binds us and that the blood of sacrifice is what makes possible everything that we have. That was the people that understood that. And the people that were conscious of the greatness of our race that had been achieved through many, many victories, many, many glories in battle.

And that’s how a great people think. That’s how a noble people think. Now, who thinks like that now? You know, Anzac Day, when I went last year to the shrine, you know, half the faces there were like, Asian tourists and stuff. And there was like this lame speech about how multicultural the army is now and all the women that get to serve in the army now and how great and how diverse it is and how wonderful that is. And all this bullshit from, like, women in pantsuits that don’t have the first idea what the fuck they’re talking about. It’s fucking disgusting and disgraceful! That’s what it’s become. It’s a farce!

So if you go tomorrow, have that content in your heart for these scumbags as well that are up there. You’re standing there for your ancestors, but you’re not there for them. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go. Some people don’t go to these things because they’re like:

“Oh the politicians and everything get up there and sell this cucked shit!”

And then you see like a bunch of pajeet army cadets marching around or something. And you’re not there for them, you’re there for the ancestors. They’re there watching down, looking at us. That’s why you’re there. So contempt for the scum that rule over us now and the desecration of their sacrifice. But you got to stay true to what it was. When we win, Anzac Day is going to be like it used to be again. The people will be inspired again.

But, yeah, dwindling numbers, dwindling concern. But one thing you’ll notice, the Dawn Service. At your local Dawn Service, there’ll be a lot of White faces, there won’t be too many immigrant faces because the Indians are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, the fucking Chinese are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, etc., to come down and venerate our ancestors because it’s our ancestors, not theirs. And they’ll try and say things like:

“Oh, the Anzacs were a multicultural fighting force because there were like five Chinese guys that went to Gallipoli or something!”

It’s fucking bullshit! Those were White men fighting for a White Australia. End of!

Blair Cottrell: I’d like to see any Welcome to Country or whatever bullshit they try to come up with at the ceremonies shouted down personally, you know. Legally, of course, but you have the right to protest. If you’re at one of these ceremonies, you have the rights to voice your protest if you’re not happy with what’s being said by the official bureaucrats on the microphones. This is still your country, you still have a say. So don’t be scared to make your voice heard tomorrow morning. If they try to pull any bullshit!

[1:04:26]

Joel Davis: Old mate in the chat said:

“If there’s any abo shit at the one I go to, I’m not sure how I’ll react. Like, I mean, marching up to the mic and going off about it! I’ll boo at least! Every year I feel it get more tense.”

Yeah, well, if there’s a welcome country, Welcome to Country tomorrow and whatever service you’re at, boo that fucking shit! And hopefully the people around you start booing.

Blair Cottrell: When you take a few mates. If you go with a few people and they agree to sort of echo your sentiments, you know, it can catch on quite quickly. I think I keep cutting out too. Like, sorry, if I’m cutting out my WiFi signals a little bit off.

But like I said the if the feeling is there, it should be contagious amongst other people too. I wouldn’t expect too much of ordinary folks because like I said, there have been conditioned by the fear of consequence for voicing any protest against the official social policy of the government and the bureaucracy. But I don’t know, the thing about regular people is they’re fickle, and if they feel enough people are doing something then they’ll join in with it, whatever it is. So, you know. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Exactly.

Blair Cottrell: That’s just some advice.

Joel Davis: Human beings are herd animals. They go along with what everyone around them is doing.

And so in the same way that it seems like everyone around you is a cuck, if there are enough nationalists, if there are enough Nazis or whatever, they would be a Nazi, there would be whatever is around them.

And so that’s what our political mission is like giving people the licence to express their instincts. Like the instincts are still in there. But few people have the balls, have the self consciousness to move first. We are the first movers. We are the ones that, we are the trailblazers.

And then eventually, if enough follow in our wake and we build enough momentum, then we will give the people at large the confidence to finally express what they really feel inside. That has been repressed for decades. And that’s what the mission is, that’s what we’re doing, that’s the objective. But is there anything else you wanted to say about Anzac Day, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: Nah. Look, I’m in a lot of pain, so I’m gonna just let you finish up. If you don’t know if you’re tuning in late. I’ve got this like brutal eye infection. Don’t know how it happened. It’s in the eyelid. It’s cellulitis, but only in the eyelid. It’s not actually in the eye socket, which means I won’t lose my vision, but I need to take antibiotics to kill it because it could spread to the eye socket and if it does, that’s bad for me. But I’m just sitting here in a very bad mood and experiencing a lot of pain.

So I’m gonna go.

Joel Davis: Listen, you can’t, can you react at least to Matt Trihey his, …

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s gonna cheer me up!

I just saw a video of that late. So Matt Trihey is leader of, I think it’s called the National Workers Alliance. He’s been very aggressive and very, very energetic for the last, I’d say 12 to 18 months. Hosting meetings, doing protests. The guy is a true patriot! It’s good to see a real Aussie patriot, salt of the earth, working class builder. Pretty sure he’s a builder too. And he’s out there on the front lines doing what needs to be done. And where was he was at some sort of Teals meeting, wasn’t he? Yes.

Joel Davis: So the electorate of Kooyong which is one of the more affluent parts of Melbourne where Toorak and Glen Iris and suburbs like this are located within. Traditionally it’s always been a Liberal seat because it’s a more affluent area. But the last election they voted in a Teal independent by the name of Monique Ryan. And the so-called Teals are a disgusting blend of like the social policies of the Greens mixed with the economic policies of the Liberals.

Basically like the most disgusting all mixed together into the most [word unclear] and appeals to rich White women who watch the ABC religiously. It’s like Hillary Clinton basically at the last election in [word unclear] Anyway she had some meeting and they were talking about why we need to give more money to the ABC or some fucking bullshit like that so we can have more communist propaganda more anti-White tax funded communist propaganda pumped out into all these Boomer White women who are the only ones that even fucking [word unclear]. And he confronted them that mass immigration is causing, is exposing our people to increases in crime, rapes, burglaries, violence etc. And then all the Boomer White women at the meeting had a hysterical reaction. One of them even started shrieking. One of these old ladies punched him in the face! [chuckling] But it was on Channel Nine news tonight actually. He made the news so I think he did this stunt. Maybe it was yesterday and then the video went out today. The Noticer posted it. I shared it on Telegram if you want to watch it.

But I’m going to play. I haven’t actually seen the clip. I want to see how the news covered it. So it made the news. Let’s see how the news covered it because it’s a pretty interesting story. We’ll watch the news and if they spin it really hard I’ll play the original clip.

[Channel 9 news clip]

[Reporter] It was meant to be a peaceful community chat until far-Right agitated Matt Trihey loudly barged in and was punched in the face by a woman in the audience.

[Dr. Ryan] Fortunately it didn’t really connect. She was much smaller than he was quite a big man.

[Reporter] Teal MP Monique Ryan and Labor candidate Clive Crosby shocked by what happened. Dr. Ryan consoled the woman after the incident.

[Dr. Ryan] She was sorry that she’d lost control in the way that she did. But she found the whole thing very distressing.

[Reporter] Trihey is the leader of the National Workers Alliance. He denies he’s a Neo Nazi, but was once a member of Thomas Sewell’s White nationalist group, the Lads Society.

[Rachel Dexter] This individual has been part of groups that are run by neo-Nazis, well publicised Neo Nazis.

[Reporter] Tensions have flared across the campaign in the past, 24 hours. Two men charged over separate violent incidents in Sydney.

[PM Albanese] There’s no place for violence in our political system. We’re a democracy. It’s important that people engage in a respectful way. That includes people who are candidates, but it includes everyone.

[Dr. Ryan] I hope that after this election campaign things will cool down, the temperature will drop a bit, we’ll be able to get back to normal.

[Reporter] Whether those inflaming tensions listen is up for debate. Brett McLeod, Nine News.

[1:11:32]

Blair Cottrell: Do me a favour. Hang on.

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know what just happened to Blair there, but notice how they basically blamed him for some lady punching him in the face. They’re like:

“Oh, violence is escalating!”

And it’s apparently his fault. They’re victim blaming. Imagine if he went in there and punched someone in the face. It’d be like:

“Far-Right, thug beats people up at a meeting!”

But if they hit him, … Now, Matt Trihey, by the way, was a professional MMA fighter. He was, he fought in, I don’t think he fought in the UFC, but he fought in, I think Pride. So I think an old lady punching him in the face doesn’t really bother him too much. He’s a pretty tough dude.

But yeah, [chuckling] I mean, it’s just kind of ridiculous, the double standard:

“Oh, well like we got to give this poor old lady a hug because she sperged out and punched Trihey in the face!”

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t that weird behaviour! How the aggressor, the person trying to punch someone, who cares if it’s an old lady, she still tried to punch the guy! She’s hugged. She’s hugged and treated like a victim while the actual victim of the assault is like continuously like pushed out of the building as though he’s the cause for concern.

I mean, I realise she’s just an old lady and who cares that she punched someone? I don’t care! I’m sure Matt Trihey doesn’t care. It’s not like he’s at home with some ice on that shiner. He’d just be laughing about it. It’s just still very strange behaviour. You know, we’re told so often that it’s never okay to put your hands on anyone. It’s the you’re a dirty, horrible person if you even think about assaulting another human being!

But then when some lady does it:

“Oh, the poor thing! Let’s give her a hug!”

That’s fucking weird, man! What? Obviously I don’t even know how to interpret it, actually. I can’t comment further than it’s just fucking weird!

Joel Davis: Yeah. I can’t be bothered playing the original video. You can go find it on The Noticer. You could find it on my page. I think Tom shared it. I don’t know if you shared it. I think you shared it. So you can go watch it on Telegram or on Twitter.

But yeah, like, literally, these women are shrieking. He goes in there. He’s calm. He just starts talking about crime statistics and immigration and asking for an answer.

Blair Cottrell: And that’s all he does. That’s pretty much all he does! All he does is list off crime stats about how many immigrants are actually committing crimes, how many immigrants are committing rape, how much rape has increased in certain states and regions in proportion to the increase in immigration. That’s all he does! All he does is list off facts. He just spits facts, and people lose their minds and are now physically attacking him. How insane is that? How retarded are people? How embarrassing it is to be a member of the same race as people like that? Like, do you ever feel like that, Joel? Do you ever feel like you’re born on the wrong planet or something? It’s like, what the fuck, what’s going on here? Who are these fucking cs?

Joel Davis: Why are we letting retarded old ladies participate in politics? Like, shut up, grandma! You’re a retard! [chuckling]

Blair Cottrell: Why do they even have to participate in politics? I mean, I don’t know. Are they bored? Maybe they feel like they’re making a difference or something.

Joel Davis: They are bored. They’re sitting at home watching television all day, and then the news is talking about politics all the time, and they get all hyped up on it.

Blair Cottrell: Imagine the story. Imagine the story. Oh, Gladys!

Joel Davis: Ingesting so much propaganda. And then someone comes in and says something mean coded.

And then they literally start shrieking. One of them was like, fucking shrieking like a banshee! Some old lady punches a man in the face! And they’re trying to drag him out, but he’s like, he’s a strong guy, so he’s just kind of like, whatever. But these old women are trying to drag him out. And then some random, like, soy Jack old dude is like:

“How could you do this in here!”

Like, just like doing this like weird outrage thing. It’s fucking pathetic! But the reaction on social media was funny. Everyone was kind of just taking the piss out of these retarded Boomers.

But then like the news. The news is like, we know about how much bias they have because we play clips of them covering us all the time. You know, they just always frame things in such a ridiculous way.

[1:15:55]

Blair Cottrell: But I think it’s obvious some craze Leftist attack someone physically. The statement from the relevant statesman, and I think it was from actually Albanese, the Prime Minister himself in this particular instance, is:

“Violence from either side it won’t be tolerated!”

But then whenever something mean is said by someone on the far-Right, as they call it, the far-Right, well then, it’s always the far-Right that are targeted specifically. And like you’ve got to change laws to stop them offending people. Then you see some actual physical assault or violence and their response is:

“Well, both sides need to be careful with what they’re doing.”

Joel Davis: It’s so where her outburst was justified because her “feelings” got hurt.

But then we get treated, we don’t commit violence, we hurt people’s feelings, therefore we’re the bad guy. And so like:

“Women can’t be responsible for the fact that they’re hysterical. It’s obviously the man’s fault because we made them upset. Because female emotions and feelings need to rule over rationality or any other kind of modicum of reasonable, consistent standards for behaviour, that goes out the window because an old lady got upset and started crying and therefore she’s the victim.”

And this is what we’re ruled by as a society. I was looking at this study the other day. There was a study that was done, a Meta analysis of basically all forms of literature in the English language. I think they got an AI to assess what’s the prevalence of words that describe rational thought and the prevalence of words that describe emotional predilections, and what’s the ratio. How rational or how emotional is the general language of everything published in the English language. And from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution up to the late 1960s, about 1970, it gets more and more and more rational through time to the point where it’s super majority rational. Then in 1970, after the second wave feminism and women are introduced into the workforce and academia and politics and so on, you get this complete cascade where now everything published in the English language is hyper emotional, more emotional than ever!

And that’s what’s happened to our society writ large. We live in a society where emotions rule over reason. Well, that is a society that is going to become deeply dysfunctional. Because that’s the definition of immaturity. That’s the definition essentially of insanity!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. When “hurt feelings” are the inspiration for crackdown on free speech. Can’t say this, can’t raise your arm in the air.

Basically, everything, every change legally, every social standard is built around not “hurting people’s feelings”. I can remember when I was in school, when I was in primary school, everything got banned. Everything the boys were doing got banned! And it got banned throughout my time in primary school. It’s like I was born in the exact right generation to see it all happen. First thing that got banned was Pokemon cards. And it happened on the day that I got my first ever deck on my birthday. I remember this like, I think I was in grade three and Mum bought me a deck of Pokemon cards. First time. I was excited to go to school with my new holographic nine tails and flex on all the boys because no one else had that. I think one other kid might have had it, but he was glorified for it.

Anyway, the day I get there, there’s an announcement on the speakers that Pokemon cards have been causing too much conflict amongst the boys and they’re banned. They’re no longer allowed. And if any boys had Pokemon cards on them, they had to leave them in their school bags, take them home and never bring them back. Pokemon cards banned!

So then we started playing Australian League football. We used the trees as goal posts. Three months later or so, that was banned! Because some kid got tackled and cried. And it was all banned by a female vice principal. The actual principal of the school was a man named Peter Williams, but he was never around. He was always absent. It seemed like the vice principal, some woman, I can’t remember her name, she was ruling the roost instead of him. She was the one banning everything. You know, we couldn’t play footy anymore, we couldn’t do Pokemon cards.

So then we started doing marbles that got banned because someone threw a marble at someone and their parents got called and they were unhappy about it. So no more marbles! Then British Bulldogs in the Marble Pit because there was no more use for the Marble Pit now.

So we just started playing British Bulldogs. But some kids shorts, school shorts, got torn a little bit when he got tackled and the parents, the mother called the school and bitched about it. And so that was banned!

And I remember we were sitting around once at lunchtime primary school. By the time everything was banned, we were like grade six, the final year of primary school.

And I said to the boys:

“What are we allowed to do? We can’t even do anything!”

We couldn’t even play brandy, throw a tennis ball at each other. And what is, what does Sewell call this? The gynocracy? I think he calls it the “Gynocracy”, where everything’s banned for the sake because someone might get hurt or it may upset someone, you’re not allowed to do it. No one’s allowed to have any sort of fun or do anything for the sake of saving feelings and someone might get hurt. So it’s not allowed.

And I witnessed all that in primary school. I witnessed the birth of the gynocracy. And now the gynocracy is in politics, now it’s in Parliament and now it’s bearing down on us from that position, from the position of institutional leadership. And that’s what we suffer, my friends, we suffer the giantocracy! And how do we defeat it? How do we defeat the giantocracy? By just not caring and doing whatever we want. Because the gynocracy has gone so far, there’s not even a lot of capable police officers anymore.

So it’s not like there’s any serious consequence waiting around the corner anyway. So I think that’s how you actually get around it. You literally just play whatever game you want to play, say whatever you want to say, make any gesture you want to make, believe what you want to believe, and so long as you’re not actually physically hurting anyone, who cares? Do what you want to do. I guess if enough people do that, then the gynocracy fails, right?

[1:22:21]

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the origin story of an ancient myth in our people, the myth of Percival, or of Parsifal, if you’re a German, who was one of the knights of King Arthur’s knights. One of the knights of the Round Table, who was one of the only ones to actually attain the Holy Grail. And at the beginning, when he was a boy, he was raised in the forest by his mother, and his mother basically kept him away from civilisation because his father and his two older brothers, they went and became knights and they died in battle. And she was all he had left. And so she took him out to the Woods and raised him in the Woods and told him nothing of his of his older brothers and of his father to try and keep him safe. And he’s playing out in the forest one day and he comes across some of the Knights of the Round Table, some of King Arthur’s knights, and they tell him all about what it’s like to be a knight. And immediately he’s like:

“I want to be a knight! That sounds awesome!”

And he goes back and he says:

“Mom, I’m going to go be a knight!”

And she has a mental breakdown:

“No, you can’t leave me. You must stay here where it’s safe!”

And eventually he wins the argument and she realises that there’s nothing that she can say to stop him. And she knits him a sweater to wear at all times and says:

“Wear this.”

And then he leaves and she dies of a broken heart. And there’s a later time where he’s in a great battle where he has to take the sweater off, take off the comfort of the gynocracy, basically, in order to win!

And that’s the beginning, that’s the origin story, is leaving behind security of the womb, the security of the kind of maternal sphere where everything is soft and all the threats are neutralised and everyone has to be nice to each other and sweet to each other and everyone is cared for and nurtured. In order to achieve your destiny, in order to become great, in order to become noble, you have to cast that off and go out. And go on adventures and fight and battle and so on, and find your way to the grail, to the meaning of it all, to be the hero.

So that’s a [word unclear] for a reason.

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that men need to be able to compete? Men need an outlet for the energy that they have as men. They need to be able to Barter and trade and fight. They need to be able to play sport. They need to be able to compete! If they can’t for the sake of people not getting hurt or feelings not getting hurt, don’t you think that’s why you see such radical explosions of rage in society now? That’s why men are so angry, because they’ve got all this repressed energy.

I mean, you hear stories about guys just snapping over what seems to be nothing, and you’ve got this domestic violence problem where a lot of the time it’s blamed on men, but really it’s just men are being pushed too far, or they’ve got so much repressed energy because there’s no way for them to actually express that basic competitive element, the desire to achieve something, the desire to build something, to work towards some greater projects. You know what I mean? Like there’s just kind of like no real outlet for a lot of men.

And so I think that’s why you’ve got examples or scenarios in society where some guy is setting a car on fire with his whole family inside, or just losing his shit at seemingly nothing. But really it was 20 years of the gynocracy telling him he’s not allowed to do anything because he’s bad because he’s a man! I don’t know. It’s something to think about because you can’t just cancel everything men do and expect men to react in some sort of obedient, passive way.

Obviously there’s going to be consequences for that. Men aren’t going to accept that. Men aren’t going to react well to that kind of system. I need to think more about this because the idea just came into my head then I’m so I’m not going to be able to articulate it as well as I’d like to.

Joel Davis: Also, everything wrong with our society is downstream from fucking cucked men! Men who adapt their behaviour to make their girlfriend or wife happy. Which means avoiding risk taking, not spending time with the boys, but spending time with her in the security of the lounge suite, watching goy flicks, eating Uber Eats, or taking her to out shopping or something. That’s what she wants to be doing. She wants to be safe. Maybe if she’s a so-called tradition wife, she wants to go move to the countryside and have chickens and shit! And she doesn’t want you getting arrested, she doesn’t want you going to jail, she doesn’t want you getting into fights, she doesn’t want you dying, and like okay, fair enough.

But ultimately that’s your destiny if you’re a political revolutionary, that’s your destiny. If you’re a true, if you’re a warrior, if you’re a man of nobility, a man of strength, you want to go and solve your own problems with your own strength. You don’t want to retreat to safety. That’s the pathway of the coward.

[1:27:41]

Blair Cottrell: I still don’t see it as either, or, though. I don’t see it as either, or. Like you should be able to spend time with women and fight for what you believe in. You shouldn’t have to choose. Why should you have to fucking choose?

Joel Davis: Well, I mean you don’t have to choose because women might try and gaslight you and pressure you, but at the end of the day if you just do what you want, they’ll just accept it. [chuckling] Like realistically.

Blair Cottrell: It’s nice to make a woman happy. That’s also nice to fight for what you believe in. Like I get reward chemicals from doing both of those things. So I’d like to not in order to do the other. I don’t think it needs to be so two dimensional.

Joel Davis: No, I’m not suggesting that it is but ultimately like there’s going to be times where you have to choose one or the other and if you just always choose the cucked safe wife guy option, your life will pass by and you will have been domesticated. And you will not have actually expressed your virility and truly stood for anything. And you will become pacified and you will become neutralised and then you’ll die.

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen those dads that actually admit that they’ve been domesticated in an extreme way? And they make a joke out of, they’re like:

“Yeah, my wife has my balls in a glass of water next to the bed, ha, ha, ha!”

And they like joke about it. What’s with that? That’s nothing to be proud of, bro! It’s not funny at all! [chuckling] You know, if your dad’s like that, if you know someone like that, tell them to wake up to themselves. You know, it’s not funny to not have any sort of sway over your domestic situation. To have no freedom.

Joel Davis: That’s what the weak do they do self depreciating jokes as a form of allaying their anxieties be like:

“Yeah, I’m a weak piece of shit! Isn’t that relatable? Aren’t you a weak piece of shit too? At least I can like have some kind of common ground with you in my existential dissatisfaction and shame.”

I was like:

“No, I actually can’t relate to that.”

Anyway, let’s do the Superchats and let’s. And let’s end the fucking stream! What do you think?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I was gonna shuffle off anyway because my eye hurts so much.

Joel Davis: Just hang out for five minutes and we’ll be done.

Blair Cottrell: All right.

Joel Davis: Jake 1219 said:

“Coming back to what Joel was saying, Winston, with the help of the British political (Winston Churchill), with the help of the British political establishment and the aristocratic establishment’s old money sold the West out for communism. 100%, right?”

I wouldn’t say communism. I’d say jewish interests.

But yeah, sure, we talked about that before. There was a show we did on World War II revisionism last year that I thought was pretty good. You can go back and watch that.

Home of the Brave said:

“‘Neo-Nazi boss’ Thomas Sewell, (as in quotation marks). The way the media covered your registering as a political party couldn’t have gone better. Can’t wait to see how you guys roll it all out. Could be the blueprint for us all.”

Well, yeah, it’s nice to get the promotion and it was funny. But yeah, it’s gonna be a process. It’s not happening tomorrow. The election is coming up obviously in a week. The next show is going to be about the election. I’m going to do other streams this week about the election and we’re going to have some other, we’ve got some other things planned for election week. We’re going to get Anzac Day over and done with first and then we’re going to focus on that.

But I will say it is funny how the Trumpet of Spastics party, how all of a sudden started copying half baked versions of our talking points and ideas in the last [chuckling] couple weeks and it could help sink the Liberal Party. So it’s pretty funny!

And as I said on Telegram:

“Clive, if you just called me up three months ago and gave me one of like one of the $90 million you’ve already wasted on this failed election campaign, I could have helped you run it much better and you would have got more votes.”

But instead of just stealing my ideas with no credit in a half assed way in the second last week of the election campaign. So you missed the boat on that one. Jake1219 also said:

“Question for both. 30% of Australia’s population were born overseas. How do you go about working jobs, operating current society socially, cordially with so many migrants in your face?”

I don’t personally. [chuckling]

Blair Cottrell: With great difficulty and a great amount of selectivity! And not without the urge to headbutt people on the regular. So it’s frustrating! It is, yeah. But when running your own business like I do, you can be selective especially because it’s like word of mouth through people who know people in an area where most people are Aussies, it’s not so bad.

But yeah, I could imagine it depends on the field in which you’re working. I know construction is getting pretty bad and you know, I’d probably stay right away from tech. The closer you are to the city, the worse it’s going to be. There’s various factors to consider. But the closer to the city you are, the more patience you’re going to need. I don’t have the patience man to work around these illustrious skilled labourers from overseas.

Joel Davis: Fellow Comrade said:

“I’m late. I will watch the replay. Thanks guys!”

Yeah, cheers.

Blair Cottrell: Did you see we had $20 from the Comfy Friend who [chuckling] says:

“Gerard Rennick White power!”

Joel Davis: Yeah, well if you’re in Queensland, give Gerard Rennick a vote. I hope he gets back into the Senate. He did call out the jews, the Mossad and so on.

And I think he’s a good man. You know he’s not everything that we would want, but he’s the best of the bunch. So I hope that he gets re-elected And I like him. I think he’s an all right guy. And a few our guys are working in his campaign team so respect to the grind. And yeah, obviously hail Comfy Friend, friend of the show. I think that’s all the Superchats. Let me check. I think that’s all the Superchats for this evening.

So yeah, everyone up early tomorrow for Anzac Day. And yeah, make sure you’re down there. And be there for the ancestors. Venerate tomorrow. Treat tomorrow like a religious holiday. That’s what it is, a day to commemorate our national religion of the ancestors who gave blood for our people. That’s what it’s about. And hail White Australia and hail the Anzacs. Why Power! Fellow Comrades said:

“One more Superchat for fun.”

Well thanks dude and we’ll end it there. See you next time.

[1:34:46]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/25/2025 = 10)

Supporter
6 hours ago
same thing the Americans in WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam etc fought for….. Nothing Their lives were wasted
4 likes
Report

‹ Hide 1 reply
TheBeardedIndian
Supporter+
3 hours ago
Top comment. These war memorial events should not be a celebration of sacrifice, they should be annual reminders of not being duped again into dying for no good reason. Celebrating these wars furthers the Jewish plan for Christians to slaughter each other.
0 likes
Report

ThigASteach
Supporter
8 hours ago
Great conversation. Appreciate you guys. #PeaceAndRespect
3 likes
Report

katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – So Much Has Happened, But We’re Only Just Getting Started – Apr 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/04/12/joel-davis-so-much-has-happened-but-were-only-just-getting-started-apr-11-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream video episode Aussie nationalist activists Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell have a discussion, followed by a separate Blair Cottrell and Joel Davis discussion. The two separate discussion are a result of severe and unreasonable bail conditions imposed on Tom and Joel as a result of police and court harrassment.
2 likes

Delete
fastnail
5 hours ago
And the British and Irish.
1 like
Report

TheShowgun
SubSupporter+
5 hours ago
prayin for your well health Blair!! although, Blair with an eyepatch would go hard af..
0 likes
Report

BlueNorth88
3 hours ago
Blair’s missus can really bang
0 likes
Report

GlobalistJuice
3 hours ago
Joel would be an awesome teacher of history in Australia’s schools – his storytelling is sublime, a flowing voice that is detail engaging with appropriate inflection while retaining a smooth masculine tone that is easy-on-the-ears.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair said something like “The youth are more radical because they’re desensitized,” not because they’re more intellectually curious and open. Sounds correct. I’ll take it though. The masses are a force multiplier for whoever can move them. We just need to be the coolest thing out there and the mindless kids will follow.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair is wondering if he’s a “mere” entertainer. He is, but shows like this are crucial to making these concepts cool and normalizing them. So he plays a crucial role in allowing us to eventually instrumentalize the normie to our ends (and for their benefit).
0 likes

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 16,238

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5: Thu, May 1, 2025 — Transcript now completed = 95/95 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 4: Wed, Apr 30, 2025 — Transcript completed = 82/95 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 3: Sun, Apr 27, 2025 — Transcript completed = 46/95 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 2: Sat, Apr 26, 2025 — Transcript completed = 35/95 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Fri, Apr 25, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 17/95 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Rumble comments (10).

Mark Collett – Can National Socialism Be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis – Mar 23, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:54:17 +0000

Mark Collett

Can National Socialism Be Resurrected?

with Joel Davis

Sun, Mar 23, 2025

Mark introduces Joel Davis as a leading young intellectual in the world-wide nationalist movement (2:00)

Joel explains he wrote an essay defending the rehabilitation of National Socialism in response to Keith Woods’ criticism (7:00)

Joel argues nationalism needs an ideology to serve it, and National Socialism is built entirely out of the nationalist idea (10:00)

Joel discusses Carl Schmitt’s prediction that liberalism and nationalism would become enemies (13:00)

Joel argues Germany had a unique historical role in resisting liberalism in Europe (18:00)

Mark asks Joel to focus on why National Socialism is relevant today rather than historical context (22:00)

Joel says Australia needs National Socialist principles to survive as a White nation (25:00)

“We need a movement that inspires people to have courage.”-Joel (30:00)

Discussion of the term “Nazi” losing power as an insult (35:00)

Joel criticises conservatives for allowing the Left to dictate their standards (40:00)

Mark questions Joel’s opposition to working with other ethnic nationalist groups (45:00)

“I want to have a space where White people organise our own politics amongst ourselves.”-Joel (50:00)

Debate over showing empathy for Palestinian victims vs focusing solely on White interests (60:00)

Joel argues Whites need to focus on organising themselves rather than foreign conflicts (70:00)

“We need fighters. I mean, obviously by fighters you mean political fighters.”-Mark (75:00)

Discussion of Holocaust revisionism becoming more mainstream (80:00)

Joel says rehabilitating National Socialism is the last discursive gate-keeping to break (85:00)

Mark notes the irony of Joel’s past charity work in India given his current views (90:00)

Joel explains his view that Whites need their own exclusive organisations (95:00)

“We should be going out and meeting with Whites, converting Whites to our worldview, organising Whites into our organisation.”-Joel (100:00)

Debate over showing empathy for non-White victims of conflicts (105:00)

Joel argues caring about foreign conflicts is a distraction from focusing on White interests (110:00)

Mark suggests Joel’s approach lacks the politeness of historical National Socialists (115:00)

Discussion of differences between Australian and British communication styles (120:00)

Joel criticises seeking alliances with non-Whites as reproducing White weakness (125:00)

Debate over anti-Islam rhetoric potentially serving Zionist interests (130:00)

“We’ve got to protect Israel, you know.”-Mark sarcastically (135:00)

Joel argues cowardice, not argument framing, is holding back the White race (140:00)

“I believe in the total rational coherence of my worldview”-Joel (145:00)

Joel says World War II was a metaphysical war between the particular and universal (150:00)

Mark thanks Joel and urges Keith Woods to debate him.

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/Can-National-Socialism-be-Resurrected:7

https://rumble.com/v6r1sku-can-national-socialism-be-resurrected-with-joel-davis.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

https://gab.com/MarkCollett

https://t.me/s/markacollett

Published on Sun, Mar 23, 2025

Description

Can National Socialism be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis
March 24, 2025
1,133 views
123
Support
Save
Repost
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
16K followers
Join
Following
Keith Woods and Joel Davis have been engaged in an online debate over the issue of National Socialism and its relevance in the modern world. Tonight, I am joined by Joel Davis as he makes his case and answers questions about the efficacy of his political plans.
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrs
JUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
FREE eBook download:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/downloads/TheFallofWesternMan.pdf
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
File size
3.33 GB
Less
100
1461 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 26,205 – Duration: 152 mins)

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to tonight’s stream. Sorry we’re a couple of minutes late. I had a few things to do with the family. Sunday night bedtimes, never easy, but here we are. So we might run five minutes over to make it up to you.

Now, obviously, this is a very important stream and we’re live tonight on Rumble. We’re live on Odysee, we’re live on DLive, and we’re live on Entropy.

And if you want to share this, please do, because this is an important debate and I’m going to be dealing with this slightly differently tonight to how other people have dealt with this, because I want to ask Joel some really searching questions and I also want to discuss the wider issues around this debate.

So if you can share this, it would be very much appreciated and I’ll be sharing it myself on Telegram in a couple of seconds.

Now, I’d like to thank Joel firstly for getting up so early in the morning to do this. He’s already knocking back the energy drink and this is an hour later than I usually do stream. So thank you to all the people who have turned up, regardless of the sort of slightly strange scheduling, and to all the Australian guests who have woken up super early.

Now, obviously there’s been a lot of people debating this over the last couple of days. There’s been a lot of people in my chat debating this today when I announced the stream. So if you want to put a question to Joel, you can through Odysee or Entropy, if you want to send a Superchat, you can.

Now, I’m going to ask Joel questions, and depending on the number of Superchats, I will ask him questions from the audience in the second half of the show. And we’re aiming to go for between about an hour and a half and two hours, two hours max. And in this time, I want to allow Joel to assert himself, but I also want to ask him questions that are what I think are the most sort of common and sort of overdone critiques of what Joel is saying. I do want to see how he answers those. And I have a few critiques of what he says.

And I also have a few questions about certain things that, from my perspective, I find a little bit odd about what’s going on at the moment. You might be thinking:

“What are you talking about? Why is all this odd?”

Well, I’ll explain that in a few minutes.

But if you want to put your questions to Joel, you can do. Now, any Superchats go to a good cause. So if you do want to make a donation, if you do want to support the stream, please do. So and you can do that via Odysee or Entropy. As I said earlier, just hit that support button and all funds are gratefully received.

Now, let’s get into this. Listening to the debate, because most people have seen the debate. The debate started when Keith Woods wrote an article about this saying why no one should be invested at all in National Socialism and why it sort of needed to be dumped. And this came on the back of Keith actually doing sort of a debunking of sorts of Europa the Last Battle.

Now, I’ve seen Europa the Last Battle, I think it’s excellent, I really enjoyed it. But Keith had a few negative things to say about it and a few people were like:

“Well why is Keith doing this, why is he going down this route, etc?”

And look, I really like Keith, think he’s an intelligent guy. I’ve had him on the show plenty of times. I’ve not met him in real life, but he seems really nice. He’s always very, very affable. But Keith hasn’t debated Joel publicly about this, and I think that’s a bit of a mistake on Keith’s part. Because I think if your ideas are going to stand up and they’re going to be held to scrutiny, they have to do so not in the vacuum of your own personal writings on your Substack, but in the open field of debate with your contemporaries.

Now, when I was held to account for certain things I said about Vladimir Putin, Russia, Ukraine, etc, well, I went on a debate and I debated Greg Johnson, and around 80% of the people who voted afterwards said they thought I won that debate, which was happy about. But if I don’t feel confident in what I’m saying, maybe I wouldn’t have done the debate. But I do feel confident. I think Keith should debate Joel. I messaged both of them and I’d have liked them to have done this as an actual debate.

But obviously Joel’s come on and I’m gonna sort of play a little bit of devil’s advocate here to spice things up a little bit. And I’ll also give my personal view nearer the end of this.

Now, I’m gonna start by saying:

“Look, Joel, I really respect you.”

I’ve met you in person, I really like you, and I think you are one of the leading young intellectuals in the world-wide nationalist movement. And you get plenty of praise, you get plenty of fantastic media appearances, and you always do very, very well. You’ve also been a speaker at one of my events, a Patriotic Alternative event, and you did excellently. Your speeches were always fantastic! And you’re somebody who is face out. You’re somebody who’s put your neck on the line and your name on the line.

[05:03]

So if anyone in the chat is going to be sort of besmirching this guy, I’ve seen some people attacking Joel. Personally, I think that’s very unfair. Joel isn’t sort of a faceless, nameless Internet pseudonym who comes out and says things. Joel is somebody who is brave enough to say what he thinks and say it under his own name using his own face.

So I want to sort of keep this clean and if there are trolls in the chat, I won’t have any hesitation but to Whack-A-Mole them out of existence! So please do be respectful in the chat and keep it clean.

Now, that doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything Joel says, but please do sort of keep it clean and no ludicrous accusations being thrown around, etc, etc. Because as I say, I do value Joel highly.

And anyway, let’s get into this. I’ve been speaking for about five minutes, and that’s five minutes too long. So everyone wants to hear what Joel’s got to say. So, Joel, my friend, I’m going to tap away furiously and send out the notifications to say we’re live.

But would you like to give us sort of five minutes of your position on this, sort of summarize things in five minutes and then we’ll get into this?

Joel Davis: Yeah.

So obviously I wrote a Substack essay which was a response to Keith’s, because Keith’s Substack post was actually a response to me. He referenced a series of Telegram posts that I made and he literally put like, A Response to Joel Davis as the as the subheading of the essay. So I thought I should say something back. And obviously, for those that have been around a while would know, Keith and I are old associates. I have met Keith in real life multiple times when I’ve been in Europe. We’re old friends. I known him for like six years or something. And we’ve had a lot of discussions about a lot of subjects over the years.

So if we disagree on something publicly, it’s actually the product of probably a lot of private disagreements over a very long period of time manifesting in some public form.

So he decided to make an essay. I thought this gives me an opportunity to explain my position in a way that’s probably engaging for the audience. So then I did an essay myself, but the essay that I did deal with Keith’s arguments at the end of the essay. But the bulk of the essay is actually the substance of my position. And there’s kind of like two aspects to the debate.

One aspect is the question of rehabilitation, and the other aspect is actually identifying as a National Socialist in an explicit way. What I was arguing for, in a very strong sense, was the necessity of rehabilitation, because Keith attacked both notions. I also identify as a National Socialist for various reasons, but the essay that I wrote is primarily a defense of the rehabilitation of National Socialism. Why, even if you want to call your nationalism by a different term or you want to embrace nationalism in a slightly modified way or whatever, that there needs to be a project of rehabilitation of many of the elements of National Socialism so that you’re free to use them essentially, so that you don’t have to do nationalism with the training wheels on, so to speak. So you don’t have to do nationalism under the limitations of distinguishing yourself from the National Socialists, which I think is undoubtedly a reality that we face in the contemporary situation.

There was one part of Keith’s original article where he basically almost said:

“Oh, well, it’s becoming irrelevant these days, World War II and the Nazis, and it’s fading away, so we should just let it fade away.”

But the whole premise of the article itself was that it’s actually nuclear! There’s all this stigma around National Socialism. And so attaching ourselves to it in any way, in any kind of positive way, is actually really negative. So it doesn’t make any sense. It kind of it both ways. Like either the stigma exists or it doesn’t.

And I think it obviously exists. I don’t know how you can say that it isn’t still probably the most controversial subject in all of politics. So clearly that’s there, right?

Also, there’s the reality that the entire post World War II international order has really been built around a response to the Second World War and the ideological dispute that retroactively became the meaning of the Second World War. Now there’s all these more geopolitical or economic or like practical reasons why World War II came into existence.

But ultimately the meaning of World War II, according to its victorious allies, was the destruction of the ideology of National Socialism. So like, apparently the reason why we had to declare war on Germany at the beginning was because they invaded Poland and we gave Poland a security guarantee, but the war ends with Poland under Soviet control anyway. And the Soviets also invaded Poland and we didn’t declare war on them. In fact, we allied with them against National Socialism.

[10:12]

Mark Collett: Like, this is getting into the weeds already. I mean, let me start this again in a way that I think is a better way to start this.

So I’ve been involved in this cause for two and a half decades. And when I first got involved, most people that I met in the cause were in some way, either they were either openly sort of National Socialists, covertly National Socialists, or they’d been influenced in some way by National Socialism.

Now the first thing I find very difficult to sort of comprehend about Keith’s position is the complete disavowal of National Socialism is odd, because whether you’re a National Socialist or not, and whether you identify as a National Socialist or not, I’ve got to say that pretty much any genuine nationalist movement in the world today shares the two central tenets of National Socialism, which are the nationalism and the socialism.

You do this for your people, which is the nationalism. You do this for your country. You do this because you want a homogenous closed bordered nation, that’s the national.

But you do this because you want your people to treat each other like a family. You don’t want your people to be preying on each other. You don’t want the rich preying on the poor. You don’t want the owners of capital preying on the worker. You want the workers and the owners of capital to work hand in hand. You want the rich to give the poor a leg up and you want the poor then to work hard so the rich have the capital to help the poor up further. There is a social aspect to nationalism.

So National Socialism, whatever you say about it, those two central strands run through every nationalist organisation that is alive today that is up and going.

So I looked at when I was involved in the BNP, we went out into working class communities and we told those people that we wanted British jobs for British workers. We wanted a homogeneous society, we wanted to end immigration, we wanted a fair wage for the working man, we wanted to make sure the NHS worked for normal people. Now the BNP was not a National Socialist party by any means, but to deny that there wasn’t the national and the social in the BNP would be to deny reality.

And really, I see where you’re going with this, but I felt that everyone that’s spoken to you about this, without being disrespectful to the people who have spoken to you or talking over you, have failed to grasp the fundamentals of this debate. And where I’m coming from is to say that National Socialism has no relevance would be to say that every nationalist movement today that incorporates the national and the social also has no relevance. And whilst these movements may not be National Socialist, you can see where they’ve come from and you can see a synergy.

And this is where I didn’t really understand Greg Johnson or Keith Woods’s position, because I don’t see how you can deny what I’ve just said. But please give your perspective.

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, well, like in my essay, because as I said, the essay fundamentally was a defense of my position on the basis of itself. And then I dealt with some of Keith’s criticisms, what I thought his main criticisms were at the end in light of that. And I basically broke down my position into three main subjects.

The first is that nationalism isn’t an ideology in my view. Nationalism is an idea, but it’s an idea that has historically been mixed with other ideologies, in particular liberalism. So from the late 18th century up until the early 20th century, there was a lot of nationalist liberal movements, but there’s been plenty of other kinds of nationalist movements as well throughout history. Nationalism is itself can just be seen as an idea, not necessarily the only idea which is of concern or even the most fundamental idea. It can just be one of many ideas that are considered valuable by a particular political party or movement or what have you. So my point was that nationalism needs an ideology to serve it.

And if you value the nationalist idea to its most fundamental, I believe National Socialism is a political ideology that is basically built entirely out of the nationalist idea without basically taking in any other elements. It’s basically starting at the idea of nationalism and then working it out to its absolute logical conclusion. And that’s what differentiated it from many of the liberal nationalist movements of its time and prior to its time, because National Socialism purged all the liberal qualities from nationalism.

This is significant because of the second part of my argument, which was a dialectical argument, which is that basically nationalism and liberalism have become incompatible not just because of the decision, like some kind of like specific concrete decision to turn nationalism against liberalism, because there was a bunch of nationalists who didn’t like liberalism, but because actually nationalism as an idea and liberalism as an idea are actually contradictory. And I appeal to the work of Carl Schmitt, particularly his Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy to make that point, because he basically said this in the early 1920s. He was probably the greatest German political theorist of his time. He obviously ended up joining the party. Carl Schmitt is still studied today as one of the great political thinkers of all time, despite that association.

You know, someone’s a really excellent intellectual when they could have been a Nazi and they still get taught in the universities in the contemporary era, like Martin Heidegger. Carl Schmitt is a very like rare Nazi intellectual, that’s just too good to cancel. Right?

But Carl Schmitt basically predicted and articulated what was happening and predicted the 20th century, the trajectory of politics where liberalism and nationalism would turn against one another and become enemies. Where previously they had been allies. That was mostly galvanised by, particularly from the late 18th, early 19th century, their mutual opposition to monarchy in various respects.

So you can think of a few examples of this, like say you’re in the Austro-Hungarian empire, right? You’re in this multi-ethnic empire and you are a nationalist and you want to liberate your particular ethnic group from some multi-ethnic empire. Well, obviously you’re going to kind of find common cause with a liberal notion of popular sovereignty, of:

“Oh well, we can liberate ourselves and create a Parliamentary system that represents our people directly.”

Or you know, look at like the French Revolution and its consequences. You know, if you’re going to come along and say:

“Well, we speak on behalf of the French people by virtue of the fact of our Parliamentary system and the King doesn’t, the King is the enemy of the people.”

Or whatever. You can appeal to nationalism and legitimate a liberal revolution like that. Or in America there were appeals to nationalism to differentiate the American interest from the British Empire, and the list goes on.

So there was a tension between nationalist interests and monarchical interests. And therefore common cause was found historically for various reasons.

[18:12]

But then basically the old monarchies of Europe were largely, by the end of World War I, they’d been largely defeated. Now liberalism had had a pretty totalizing victory over Western European politics. But liberalism for Schmitt is built around this idea because liberalism is built on the notion of the social contract and the Constitution. Liberalism is built around this idea of basically protecting the rights of individuals and the rights of minority groups against the majority will. It’s not, Americans will often say:

“We’re a Republic, not a democracy.”

Or something like that. You’ll hear Conservatives say that:

“Well, that’s what that idea is, which is that you have certain rights and liberties as an individual or as a minority group, which the state can’t violate even if the will of the majority is against you.”

Well, this is actually in direct opposition to the pure notion of popular sovereignty, the pure notion of democracy, which is that the will of the people should triumph.

And the will of the people isn’t just okay, if we’ve got like a set of voters and 50% plus one of our citizens vote for something that means it’s the will of the people. No, that’s not what Rousseau meant by the notion of popular sovereignty or the general will. And that’s not what Schmitt is talking about the popular sovereignty or the general will, to use the Rousseau’s term, as understood by Schmitt, is people who think in terms of the common interest, in terms of the national interest. Right. So what National Socialism means is putting the social, in the sense, the interests of society at large first!

But obviously that is understood in national terms. The national community’s interests come first before any individual or minority group interest, class interest, whatever other type of interest.

So therefore, the idea of democracy can only really be realised in the idea of nationalism, in the idea of putting the national interest before any of these other minority groups, or including the individual themselves.

And so therefore there’s this collision course between the idea of liberalism and the idea of nationalism, where. And that’s built into the notion of liberal democracy, that actually, you can’t have democracy without nationalism. Actually, democracy is illiberal when taken to its final conclusion as a notion.

And so that mutual collision course that was built into the ideas ends up realizing itself in a very concrete way in the 20th century.

And that’s what I posit. National Socialism was the ultimate historical materialisation of and the making concrete of was this phenomenon. Because the National Socialists recognised that a liberal order which was imposed upon Germany by their defeat in World War I. Obviously, there was liberal elements in the German state prior to World War I, but the Germans were obviously unique in Europe, in how much they resisted liberalism.

And you can see this in., … And this is the third part of my argument, which is Germany’s unique historical role. Which is that obviously in Western Europe, particularly at that time, you have some major powers. You know, Germany is a major power, France is a major power, Britain’s a major power. And I guess you could say, like the Russians slash Soviet Union. And the Russian slash Soviet Union are kind of like the odd man out in Europe. They kind of got one foot in the door, one foot outside the door. And that’s a complex thing.

But in Western Europe, it’s a very kind of cohesive culture in the modern world, where the development of German culture, French culture, British culture, and all the other smaller nations surrounding them, it’s kind of all happening in a kind of collective dance called “modernity”. You know, everyone is listening to each other’s music, reading each other’s philosophers, and Western Europe develops kind of together. Obviously, there’s national differences, but it develops together.

And where the British and the French really anchored their political traditions in the Enlightenment and in liberalism, the Germans were far more resistant to it. You know, the Romanticist movement in reaction to the Enlightenment in the late 18th, early 19th century, it was all over Europe, but it was really dominant in Germany.

Mark Collett: But Joel you’re giving a great sort of history lesson and sort of justification of National Socialism of the 1920s and 30s. But really what I was asking you is the debate is whether it’s sort of relevant today.

Joel Davis: Well, but it is relevant because we live in history.

Mark Collett: But I couch this as sort of like every popular nationalist party today takes the two central strands from the National Socialists, and weaves it into what they do, the national and the social. And I just wanted your take on that to whether you think that’s actually what is happening, because if that is happening, then it is undeniably relevant.

[23:14]

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think that’s true. But it’s important to understand things dialectically, in other words, that ideas have a history and that ideas work themselves out through trying to actually manifest themselves, particularly when we’re talking about politics in a concrete form, where they start realizing who their friends and enemies are through the process.

So obviously, the liberalism of the 18th century is not the same as the liberalism of today. The socialism of the 19th century is not the same as the socialism of today because these movements, as they started trying to concretely realise themselves, had shifting alliances. So liberalism once was allied with nationalism. Now it’s against it. Socialism once anchored itself in the White working class of Europe. Now it anchors itself in, basically Third World immigrants and homosexuals and feminism and so on. And it’s changed a lot of its core commitments. Well, to understand why that is, you have to understand the actual process of history. And so the appeal, …

Mark Collett: I think that’s the argument against what you’re saying, Joel, is that, … So there’s several arguments that I didn’t really want to get into this straight away, but I was more sort of hoping you’d discuss how and why it is relevant today. Because I mean Keith’s major argument or one of Keith’s major arguments or one of your major detractors’ arguments is that a history lesson is a great thing and discussing why things were relevant, how they came about, how they grew in that era is fascinating!

But we’re in 2025 now, you know, National Socialism sort of burnt in the fires of Germany in 1945 and we’re 80 years on from that now. I was more so looking for your perspective on why it is or why you believe, …

Joel Davis: Here’s why it is, Mark, because I’m in, … For example, as an Australian, to make it more concrete, as an Australian, we have obviously a White nationalist tradition. Australia was federated in 1901 under the leadership of a White nationalist movement. Obviously we didn’t rebel against the Crown. In retrospect we probably should have, but we didn’t. I don’t say that because of any kind of anti-Anglo sentiment. Obviously I am an Anglo Saxon.

But the reason why I say that is because there were some radical elements in our nationalist movement that wanted to rebel against the Crown and put the White Australia Policy in our constitution. And basically we were watered down quite significantly by the British Parliament in some of the more radical aspects of what one was aimed for by the nationalist movement.

But nevertheless the we established the White Australia Policy through legislation and we built a White nationalist country. We had a nationalised banking system, we had a very good government, comparatively speaking, prior to the Second World War in Australia. Noble, good nationalist men. And people say:

“Joel, why are you worried about this Hitler stuff? Australia had these great nationalist leaders to begin with. They had a strong, robust White nationalist tradition. Why not just focus on the Australian nationalist tradition? Why even bring in this foreign German stuff?”

And the response to that is very simple. The Australian White nationalist tradition, which I do look to and I do admire and I talk about frequently and obviously it’s part of our history, so it would be silly not to. It was fundamentally a liberal tradition!

So I don’t believe that we can have a solution to what is the world that we now exist in, which is a world in which liberalism and nationalism have turned against each other and are now enemies, where the project of global liberalism is fundamentally anchored in destroying nationalism and preventing any real nationalism from existing. I don’t believe it’s possible to create a liberal version of nationalism that’s viable. I think we have to accept the reality of where we are in history, that nationalism has to oppose itself to liberalism.

And so therefore I have to go and look to historical situations where that happened, where nationalist movements of our counterparts in Europe turned on liberalism and why and what methods they used to then draw inspiration to create a liberal nationalist movement in Australia. Because there wasn’t one in any kind of serious way in our history. We didn’t need one necessarily, because liberalism hadn’t fallen into this crisis of contradiction until the post World War II international order came about through the defeat of National Socialism and liberalism became more self consciously an anti-nationalist project. Where liberalism’s core commitment now is defending basically minority rights and interests against the assertion of the majority will.

That is very explicitly the project now. And that’s the, basically the official state policy of my country now. How did that come into being and why? And what do you do about that? What you do about that is you assert the majority will in a direct political form. There is no form more pure, that I can see, in history of doing that than the National Socialists of Germany, where it was a completely totalizing and comprehensive political project anchored in that fundamental principle.

And so that’s why I derive not only inspiration from that project, but also why that project needs to be rehabilitated. Because if that project is demonised and is considered this great historical evil, and there isn’t some kind of revisionist process where we can bring those ideas back into the discussion, where we can consider them again in an open way and consider their strengths and weaknesses or whatever, we can’t have that kind of mature discussion about them. We then basically have completely cut ourselves off from being able to form a robust and militant illiberal nationalism that is capable of doing what is necessary, in my view, to save our people.

Because I think of only a radical political project is ultimately going to be capable of addressing the great crisis of demographics. You know, the way in which, for example, my country, but this is true for pretty much every country, the way in which we’ve been integrated into this global marketplace and we’ve lost so much of our economic sovereignty in addition to having all these foreigners brought in and our elites are all traitors that are part of an (((international clique))) and the obviously the role of jewish subversion, but not just that Communist subversion and so on.

When the National Socialists came to power, they eradicated Marxism, they removed jews from all positions of power. They completely crushed Freemasonry. They wiped out all the enemies of the German people from political life and from public life. They banned foreign owned media, they banned jewish owned media. Only media that was by the German people, for the German people, in the interest of the German people was able to exist.

[30:09]

And so they protected the collective psyche of their people from subversion by alien and hostile foreign elements. That isn’t a liberal idea. That’s an idea nevertheless that I support and is necessary. And a liberal nationalist movement isn’t able to be as totalizing where you could seize state power, where you could use state power to totally crush the enemies of your people and instantiate a positive project of basically developing the blood and quality of the race of your nation in very explicit terms. National Socialism does this. National Socialism also has a intense realism about human nature and the human condition. The reality of struggle, the reality that ultimately to, … Because nationalism is built on this idea of self-determination, right? And you hear a lot of the concept of the so-called Right to self-determination. Apparently liberal world order gives all the nations that make it up, it recognises that they have a right to self-determination, apparently.

But it’s an ideological phantasm. You don’t actually have self-determination unless you are powerful enough to assert it. If your right to self-determination is guaranteed by another country, or a set of international alliances that you’re subject to, you’re not actually determining your own destiny. You’re subject to their whims.

So you can see the so-called American guarantee of self-determination, it doesn’t really feel very much like self-determination. It gives you the right to essentially have the ideology that the US State Department wants you to have. Which just so happens to correspond with you being soft core genocided in your own country. Nationalist movements being suppressed so that they can’t assert them any kind of independent will from this process and your entire economic and financial system being integrated into an international system that you don’t control, run by foreigners who don’t give a shit about you and exploit you essentially for their own benefit.

So that’s why National Socialism needs to be rehabilitated. Because the demonisation of the set of ideas that are bundled underneath National Socialism is a demonisation of a bundle of ideas that need to be applied to create a comprehensive political solution to the problems that are facing us as nationalists today. If we have to cuck ourselves and limit ourselves to only doing nationalism within a liberal framework, we will not create a political movement that is radical or revolutionary enough to achieve the victory that is necessary.

Mark Collett: So basically what you’re saying is that the fundamental strands of National Socialism are still relevant today, and more than ever necessary. And by basically disavowing and pretending that’s not the case, we limit ourselves and we actually put a barrier between ourselves and creating the movement you believe we need to win back our freedom. Is that pretty much your point?

Joel Davis: Yes.

Because if you start doing anything that is, or advocating, …

Mark Collett: Can I ask a follow up then? Because you see the biggest argument against what you’re saying, and this goes back to what I was saying earlier. I said the BNP was not a National Socialist Party, but at its core were what you could have said were the national and the social. There was the nationalism and the socialism. There was the desire for a homogeneous nation, but there was also a desire to ensure that people work together for the greater good of the community and to treat each other as part of an extended family.

So you could say at the core of the BNP’s principles, as you could argue at the core of, say, any nationalist organisation’s principles, are the national and the social. But the BNP believed that by wrapping up those principles in something that was more British, in something that was more relevant, and in something that didn’t come packaged with the baggage of the Second World War, with the baggage of his Hitler, with the baggage of decades of brainwashing, it would be easier to sell.

So it wasn’t that the BNP had given up on the ideas, but the BNP believed that by., … And I keep going back to the BNP, because I was involved in the BNP and the BNP were electorally, literally the most successful, openly sort of ethno, … Not the most successful right of the Conservative Party movement by a long way, but the most successful ethno-nationalist organisation in British history. And the people running it believed that that was the best thing to do, to hold on to those central strands, but to repackage them in a way which wasn’t so off putting to normal people. Because, you know, we’re, as I said, we’re in 2025. There’s been 80 years of intense brainwashing, intense social conditioning.

And do you think there’s any mileage to taking those central strands, stripping away certain sort of associations and selling sort of nationalism and community in a way that would be less easy to demonise? So say rather than using a swastika, you use the Australian flag. Or rather than putting a picture of Hitler front and centre. You would, if you’re in Britain. You would take British heroes.

[35:55]

And another thing about this, and this is something which nationalists have always found a barrier, nationalists have always found it very difficult to get past. And I’ve spoken about this very many times. Here in the Anglo-sphere and in Britain especially, there is this sort of foundational myth that came about after the Second World War, that Britain was founded on the idea of opposition to foreign dictators. And the idea that the sort of Britain was this plucky little upstart nation that went around defeating people like Hitler. And that’s when Britain was born. Britain was born out of sort of two World Wars and one World Cup, as ridiculous as it sounds.

How do you respond to that allegation? We don’t have much time left. I mean, here in Britain, they’re saying 2066, where White Brits are a minority. White British children could be a minority in schools by 2035, easily, by just past, 20030, if current trends continue as they are today. And people will say:

“Well, look, we don’t have much time left. We don’t have time to sort of educate the masses. We don’t have time to break down 80 years of brainwashing and conditioning. We need to take these core fundamentals and repackage them in a way that is more saleable to the man on the street and less likely to scare people away.”

How do you respond to that?

Joel Davis: Well, I would say that’s a distinct issue. Like, my argument is not that everyone needs to package themselves as National Socialists. That was not my argument. My argument was that a project of rehabilitation is necessary so that any illiberal nationalist package that you try to create can have legitimacy.

My argument is from the standpoint of ideological purity, which people often use this word purity, or particularly ideological purity, as if it is like a negative thing. And they use the phrase like “purity spiraling”. They say this is a negative thing. Taking your own ideas seriously. It’s not a negative thing. That’s actually an insane position to uphold because basically you’re showing a lack of confidence in your own ideas.

We are not going to convert the masses to any ideology because the masses are not ideological! What we can do, however, is convert the radical portion of society, or a very substantial portion of them, people who do want to develop an actual worldview, people who are interested in actually participating concretely in politics, making individual sacrifices towards a political movement. Giving their time, their resources, taking risks with, obviously in our line of work, with potentially running afoul of law enforcement and so on. There’s only a certain subset of the population that is willing to do that kind of thing.

But that subset of the population are also the subset of the population that have way more political agency than voters. Right? I don’t build my political strategy around just simply how to appeal to voters. I want to build a political strategy around how do I get that 1% of radical nationalists into a room, fired up and inspired, where they’re willing to run through brick walls for the White race!

Because if you have that 1% of the population ready to do that, organised into a serious political movement, then you can show strength to the people. Then you can show something quite impressive to the people and win them over on the basis of:

“Look at my 100,000 strong nationalist movement, look at how cool they look in their uniforms.”

Or in Britain you can’t wear uniforms. But look at the excellence that we have on display. Look at the fact that we could show the people that we’ve got a real force that can fight for you, that we don’t just have an idea, we’ve got people that are organised around an idea, that are willing to fight for that idea and challenge an elite that you hate.

So it becomes a dance, it becomes a story, rather than it being just about the ideas in the abstract. It becomes this concrete group versus that concrete group. And under those conditions, I think it’s a lot easier to win people over to supporting a radical political movement as voters or whatever, when it’s actually material, when they can actually see the leaders, when that movement can actually do concrete things in their community for them, they can meet individuals from that movement. They can see that they have sincerity, they can see that they have a plan for taking down a corrupt government that everyone hates. The legitimacy of the British government or the Australian government is at an all time low. I’ve never experienced this in my lifetime and it’s only getting worse and worse each year.

But the thing is that even though pretty much everyone agrees that the establishment is corrupt, that the system is failing, that basically by every metric society is getting worse, they don’t really see an alternative. You need to build an actual horse for them to back. That horse is not going to be built on the basis of the opinions of the masses. The opinions of the masses move last! It needs to be built upon the willpower of a committed radical minority that are happy to be unpopular because they believe in an idea on the basis of principle.

And so in order to get win those people over, you actually need to have pure principles! You actually need to have a romantic vision that is built in the essence of what the idea is that they’re going to struggle for. People are not going to go to jail for an optical marketing strategy. People will go to jail, however, for an idea that they truly believe in with their whole heart. So that’s what I’m kind of focused on. When that exists and that, …

[41:56]

Mark Collett: Can I just give you an example of that? I’ll give you an example of that supports your point because I’ve brought up some stuff that’s critical of the things you’ve said, but I’ll give you an example of some things that are actually supportive of what you’ve just said.

Now, when I joined the BNP, as I said, most people in it would, especially most activists and leading members would have described themselves as National Socialists. And there was an undercurrent of it in the party. Now, those people would have all gone to the wall for the organisation. They would have all happily gone to jail if they’d have had to.

Now, interestingly, as the party became less and less like this, and people like that were increasingly forced out of the organisation, the party did gain more electoral traction and it did become electorally successful.

But the interesting thing was the people who were attracted to the party, the sort of soft, fluffy, squishy newbies who didn’t have any affinity to the sort of ideas you’re talking about and were not ideological in any way. Well, the first bump in the road that the party hit, the first bad election, all those people left and bailed. And because there was no hardcore people left in the organisation, there was nobody left in the organisation.

You see, throughout all the lean years, throughout all the bad years in the BNP where nothing was happening, there was still a few thousand members. It wasn’t a relevant organisation because you need a lot more than a few thousand members to be relevant. But those few thousand members kept it ticking over and they never left, because they had something that kept them wedded to the movement, this belief in something greater in an ideology.

But once you got rid of that hardcore and attracted a bigger, you know, electorally stronger base of less ideological people, the first bump in the road, and all of those were gone.

And I do think there is a weight to your argument that an ideological core of people are less likely to be broken and more likely to stick at bringing about what they desire than sort of your soft Johnny come lately, Brexit Party, Australia First voters who will go back to the mainstream at the drop of a hat, at the first, as I say, electoral bump in the road. So I think that’s an important point you just made there is something to be said about sticking to something you believe in.

But there’s also something about this which we have to sort of bring up. When you look at what National Socialism was, national Socialism was a very, very ordered, structured, clean movement based around excellence. I think one thing that does put people off National Socialism today is that National Socialism does attract a lot of cranky people. It attracts a lot of weirdos. You know, there were groups in America where you see people walking down the street with swastika flags and they’ve got tattoos all over their face and piercings and gold teeth and stuff like that. I look at that and I see that as a parody of National Socialism.

What would you say about some of the weird recreations of National Socialism today? Do you see those as genuine people? Do you see them almost as sort of like Hollywood Nazis attracted to the movement because of a negative stereotype? So they think that if they’re involved with that negative stereotype, they’re the big bad guy and that makes them feel special. Do you think that’s a problem for this as well?

Joel Davis: I think maybe historically that has been a problem in various instances. But I would say a few things.

Number one, someone doing a bad job of an idea isn’t the repudiation of that idea. It’s just them doing a bad job. The question is, well, what if you did a good job?

So, yeah, like, for example, our organisation [NSN], we’re always trying to raise the standards. You have to start somewhere. And that same was true for the NSDAP. They didn’t start where they finished in terms of their aesthetics and their propriety and so on. There was a lot of street thugs in that, in the Hitler was in the streets punching with them, punching on with communists and so on. It did have a pretty rough beginning in many respects. It was a bunch of street thugs that kind of got together, that spurged out over, you know, German nationalist theory at the pub and then went out and started bashing communists in the street. Like [chuckling] that’s one way of describing its origins. There’s more to it than that obviously. But so there is that element.

Over time, they refined and they became more sophisticated and they grew and they. And so on. And the uniforms got better and obviously very keen interest was paid to the aesthetics of the presentation of the party. And it’s the most distinctive aesthetic style we’ve ever seen in political history, before or after, that still completely captures the imagination of people to this day.

So obviously that’s a lot to aspire towards. Hitler himself was literally an artist.

And so in order to be able to replicate anything of that quality is going to require a lot of work. You can’t just get a bunch of your mates together and pull off NSDAP 2, and think that it’s going to be as good. Right. So it’s a difficult thing to accomplish.

And also, we’re not necessarily doing the exact same thing that we’re doing either, because it’s different conditions and so on. In Australia, for example, Australia has certain energies in the national psyche which, which we’re trying to tap into, which is specific to Australia, that maybe don’t resonate with foreigners.

[48:20]

And part of that is because we’ve got this kind of convict, outlaw mystique in our national identity that subsists, right, where there’s this kind of romantic love of the Kelly Gang* and the Irish kind of convict energy and so on. The kind of rebellion against authority. That’s why Australians have what they call the Tall Poppy syndrome. We like people who are high status to humble themselves and show that they’re one of the people.

[* Ned Kelly Australian bushranger (1854–1880) Edward Kelly was an Australian bushranger, outlaw, gang leader, bank robber and convicted police-murderer. One of the last bushrangers, he is known for wearing a suit of bulletproof armour during his final shootout with the police. Kelly was born and raised in rural Victoria, the third of eight children to Irish parents. Wikipedia]

We’re not like Americans where we celebrate, like, celebrities and like:

“Oh, this guy’s got so much money and status, let’s hero worship him!”

Australians are the complete opposite of that. Australians, like the underdog. Australian nationalism was very much built around the worker and the dignity of the Aussie battler* and all of these motifs. And even our kind of wartime mythology is built around these guys just being farmer boys or workers who, hand him a rifle and send him against the Japanese. And he’s like an elite athlete! And it’s like that idea that the average Aussie has actually got incredible or extraordinary qualities, despite having a rough and maybe unsophisticated exterior. That’s kind of part of our, like, national identity.

[* Battler, Underdog-Battlers, in Australian colloquialism, are ordinary working-class people who persevere through their commitments despite adversity. Typically, this adversity comprises low pay, family problems, environmental hardships and personal recognition Woes. It is a term of respect and endearment intended to empower and recognise those who feel as though they exist at the bottom of society. Wikipedia]

And so, like, we are going to have to tap into that if we’re going to start accessing that. So a little bit of that outlaw esthetic is good for us in our opinion, where foreigners might look at that and go:

“Oh, they’re playing into stereotypes.”

I don’t think that would work as well. Somewhere like America where they have a completely different culture.

For example, in America they admire status, they admire this kind of refined, sophisticated individual who’s the excellent businessman, or the Hollywood, you know, movie star or whatever. They’ve got a whole different national mythology and there’s reasons for that I don’t want to go into.

So you’ve got to adapt to your local culture. Obviously you’ve got to tap into the so-called folkish spirit, of your own people and that to do it authentically. And it would be different for Britain, it’d be different for obviously in Germany, it’s different in Australia, it’s different in different countries. But at its core the question is, are you a group that really takes yourselves seriously?

Because if you don’t take yourself seriously, then society isn’t going to take you seriously.

And I think the issue that a lot of people have had with National Socialists in various instantiations, I’m not going to name any names is that they don’t come across in a way where it seems like they’re even taking themselves seriously. They’re not presenting themselves like:

“Could these guys really be an alternative to the current political establishment? Are these guys really capable of governing in any kind of way?”

So you have to be able to develop, even if you’re going to have characteristics that differentiate yourselves from the establishment, you have to convey a sense of authority and a sense of seriousness, moral seriousness, political seriousness and so on. That has to come through in how you behave.

But again, these are all practical questions. The question is, are the ideas in National Socialism good or not? Like, is it a good idea to remove all jews from positions of power? Is it a good idea to go and like destroy Freemasonry? Is it a good idea to ban Marxists from publicly organising in your country? Is it a good idea to have a racially homogeneous nation? Is it a good idea to try and develop sovereignty not just in, by the word sovereignty, but actually gear the energies of your people towards developing the economic and military means of kind of choosing their own destiny in this world?

These are fundamental principles that are in National Socialism, which I think good and I think Australia needs if Australia is going to survive like the White Australian people are going to survive. We’re going to take this continent back and achieve its full potential. That’s why I’m a National Socialist. I believe in those principles.

So I think those are good principles. If you come along and said:

“Oh well, why don’t you just have all those principles but call it some other name?”

I’m fine, I’m fine with someone saying that. I personally, I’m not going to call it another name. But when you do that, you bundle it together and you assign a different name to it. At the end of the day, there’s still going to be a discourse that’s relevant to the Nazis because they’re going to call you a Nazi for doing a bunch of stuff and believing a bunch of stuff that the Nazis believed and did.

And so you can spend all of your time saying:

“We’re not like the Nazis because, well, actually, …”

And write like long TLDR multi-paragraph explanations and how you’re not like the Nazis because of this or that reason. And that’s fine.

But at the end of the day, there’s going to need to be some kind of reckoning with the idea:

“Well, what’s so bad if we have similarities with the Nazis, Why would we not admire a movement like that as opposed to denigrate it?”

Why are we operating under like the morality of the enemy, where we’re kind of implicitly agreeing to this idea that National Socialism is this historical evil that we need to prove that we’ve differentiated ourselves from. That’s not showing strength of character and willpower, I don’t think at all!

If we truly believe in our ideas and take them seriously, and we get compared to the Nazis, we should see that as a compliment! Because that was incredibly successful movement that, basically the entire world had to unite together to defeat in the greatest war of all time! Like, that was an incredible expression of political willpower and of taking what was initially a grassroots movement of like 80 guys in a pub sperging out about political theory. It went from that to that. Like, it’s an incredible story! So we should look to it as a form of inspiration.

[54:12]

And if you don’t look to it as a form of inspiration, you’re either lying, or I think there’s something spiritually defective about your nationalism. Because in every sense in which the Nazis were extreme, or to use that label, or were kind of brutal or militaristic, is a respect in which they were simply willing to do more to achieve what was necessary in a certain sense. They took the idea of securing a future for their people. And not just a future, but a powerful and dominant future.

And there’s also the secondary aspect of this, which is that what the Germans were fighting for, they were fighting for themselves in the sense they were German nationalists. But what they were fighting for in a historical sense was a different form of Western civilisation, was for a Europe organised around their set of ideas and principles, as opposed to the ideas and principles of the communists or the liberals.

And that is this kind of like, great kind of historical Spectre which we now live in. Is Western civilisation going to represent these kind of romantic nationalist ideals? Is it going to represent this kind of you know, in my view, World War II was a metaphysical war between the particular and the universal. Where do you side on that debate? Are you on the side of the particular or on the side of the universal?

And to me, I’m on the side of the particular.

And I think if the White race doesn’t side with the particular, it will no longer exist. That the collective political, cultural, philosophical and spiritual domination of the White race and our collective culture and civilisation by the universal is fundamentally what is bringing us into this existential confrontation with our own demise.

This is even more fundamental to me than the role of jews or anything like that. All of that is a symptom of this more fundamental disease, I believe, of universalism. This metaphysical disease, if you will, where basically our entire moral outlook on the world is relativised into an abstract universal moral framework and has to be justified in those terms, where we can’t just assert ourselves on the basis of ourselves, that we can’t basically measure ourselves by the terms that we create. We can’t create our own values. We can’t assert ourselves as an individual people.

Instead, everything has to be:

“What are the universal rules of humanity? And how can we devise them in such a way that they’re fair and apply to everyone?”

Well, what that is ultimately is a rationalisation of globalism, a rationalisation of a humanitarianism that conquers European particularism and overcodes it with some project of global racial integration.

I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe in kind of trying to compromise with that framework. I believe in repudiating that entire position on the metaphysical level with it, with the metaphysical alternative and trying to represent that in my politics. I think if you try and do that in a racist way, they’re going to call you a Nazi and they’re going to be more or less correct. Like you can have an argument against it. But you’re basically doing more or less the same thing in the essence as what the Nazis were doing. So I think you just have to accept it.

Mark Collett: So with this argument, I want to add something that people in the chat have been saying, have been sort of watching what the chat’s been saying.

Now, I’ll say this. I find it a little bit odd that all of a sudden there has been this sort of attack on people who discuss National Socialism, that call themselves National Socialists. I don’t understand why that is all of a sudden. I don’t. And the reason I don’t understand this is because there seemed to be a period of time where National Socialism became less and less popular. But since 2016, more and more people have been talking about it. And there was an article in the news recently that AI translated Hitler speeches were going viral on TikTok and they were being watched by millions and millions of people. You’ve even had a famous sort of UFC fighter come out recently and started talking about maybe Hitler wasn’t that bad. You had before the last election here in Britain, one of the Reform Party candidates came out and said:

“Look, it would have been far better if Britain had allied with Hitler, if we’d never gone to war with Germany. That would have been the best option.”

And I see this coming more and more into the mainstream. And I find it odd that as this is becoming more mainstream, just as talking about sort of Zionist, jewish, Israeli influence has become more and more mainstream, there does seem to be some people just out of nowhere saying:

“Look, we need to drop this NS stuff. No one should be talking about that. No one should ever be bringing this up, least of all now.”

I do find that a bit strange because one thing that I’ve always praised the Left for is tactically, and not because I like any of their ideas, but the Left coexist.

[59:52]

So you will have the radical Left who coexist with the centre Left, because the centre Left view the radical Left as part of the tug of war. And they see them as the ones at the end of the rope pulling hardest to move the Overton Window in the direction that they need it to go.

Whereas on the quote, unquote, “Right”, you have the very opposite. You have the sort of the centre Right, you have more moderate sort of nationalists attacking those to the right of them and saying:

“Look we need complete disassociation with these people. We need to rubbish their ideas. We need to bring them down.”

And this has gone on for years. But I just find it very strange at the moment that all this would blow up, just as many of the arguments that you make are going more mainstream and people who are either in the mainstream or on mainstream social networks are being exposed to these arguments and many more of them are sort of liking what they see. What do you think caused this sudden sort of group condemnation of these arguments going mainstream from people who are really part of the radical Right? You know, Keith isn’t part of the mainstream Right and neither are many of the people who have criticised this. What do you think led to this criticism?

Joel Davis: Well, obviously, like you said, the problem with Conservatives is that they allow the Left, their ostensible apparent enemies, to dictate their standards to them.

On the Left, that doesn’t happen. Like Anthony Albanese, who’s the Prime Minister of Australia, the head of the Labour Party right now, he’s a card carrying member of the Communist Party in the 1980s. He was Antifa and like he was literally an Antifa and he was a communist, openly. So conservatives will call him a communist or people on the Right will call him a communist all the time. It doesn’t matter because no one on the Left is canceling him, like:

“Oh, we can’t let this communist, this ex-communist run our party.”

Can you imagine if it was the other way around and someone was like a National Socialist in the 80s and now they’re trying to run the Conservatives, some conservative party, they’ll be like:

“Oh, we can’t allow that to happen because this would be really bad optics.”

Well, everyone on the Right just collectively shut the fuck up about it. It wouldn’t be bad optics. In fact, you’d get away with it. The only reason you can’t get away with it is because voices on supposedly outside of politics would criticise it. Not what the Left say. Because the Left call everyone Nazis regardless. They call Peter Dutton a Nazi, they call Donald Trump a Nazi. They call everyone, …

Mark Collett: Can I just stop that? You just hit this most important point, right? You just hit the most important point that I didn’t actually bring up.

And I just want you to further this because this seems to be another weird thing to attack sort of your ideology at this time, when the term “Nazi” has been more played out than it ever, ever has!

So right now people are putting up posters all over London of Elon Musk dressed in SS uniform flanked by Farage and Trump saying:

“Everyone’s a Nazi!”

See in this country, the former sort of Indian conservative establishment of Preeti Patel, Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak, they were called Nazis! And I kind of felt that the term “Nazi” as an insult had lost a lot of its power and that was strengthening the nationalist cause.

So that’s another weird reason [chuckling] why this has came out. Sorry I butted in there, but you, …

Joel Davis: It’s a good point because people on the Right, like only care about what other people on the Right are saying. Unless they’re running the Right, then all of a sudden they start caring about what Left-wingers are saying. But the actual rank and file, the supporters, the Right-wing base does not give a shit about the standards of the Left and does not determine its views on that basis. So if the Right all got together and stopped punching Right, they wouldn’t turn around and go:

“Oh, why are all these Nazis getting mainstreamed?”

They would just support them.

So basically the gate-keeping function of the conservative establishment, it doesn’t just exist on the basis of the fact that a lot of them are jews and obviously subversives, or a lot of them are ex-Leftists and a lot of them are getting paid by big money donors that will stop paying them if they don’t engage in this kind of behaviour. That’s part of it, obviously a big part of it. But another part of it as well is careerism. Is people who want to establish a career on the Right, they need to signal that they’re basically able to work with this establishment. So how can you signal that? Well, the best way to signal that is to be like:

“Well, I’m not like them!”

And to basically just differentiate yourself, to take a, to pivot to the centre from the radical fringe and differentiate yourself from them in some way, shape or form to be like:

“Well, no, I’m not that radical. I’m not really, I’m not a White supremacist. I just I just believe in maintaining a White majority!”

Or whatever the case may be, and you’ll use all of these labels and so on to position yourself in a way that apparently make you more mainstream, palpable.

But for the average guy in the street, they actually don’t give a shit about the distinction between these terms. These are terms that only matter to political nerds, that only matter to people who work in politics.

[1:05:39]

So I don’t actually think they’re that important in the grand scheme of things. What is important, however, is the way in which people denominate:

“I’m going to stay within this safe box. I’m not going to step outside of this safe box, so you can trust me.”

And that’s all part of this deeper gate-keeping function of ideas that are capable of winning. I don’t believe that we can negotiate the policies that we want underneath this moral structure, underneath this institutional structure. I’m a radical, I’m a revolutionary! I believe that the whole thing needs to be challenged.

And a lot of people will say:

“Yeah, I agree with you, Joel, but challenging the whole thing is going to be too difficult right now. So if we can kind of get within it and we can do a little bit of work breaking down the legitimacy of that box or shifting it gradually further and further to the Right, then we’ll move it into a position where it’ll be easier to attack, where it’ll be weaker, be more exposed to a radical revolutionary attack at some point.”

And I say:

“Okay, fine, you go and do that project.”

But if you’re going to go and do that project, step one is don’t punch Right, then get in there and start punching left. Get in there and start beating up on the Conservatives and calling them out for what they are and refuse to acquiesce to the opposite direction, refuse to acquiesce to the ideological Leftism and so-called cancel culture and all of this kind of shit!

Actually go there, in there and do your job. And there’s people that are doing that do try and go into more mainstream discourse and function in that way.

And I think most of the time someone like Keith does try and do that. But there’s a lot of people who they’re ultimately putting what will ultimately advantage them and they’ll say:

“Hey, look, I am not embracing all these radical and revolutionary ideas. So I can get platformed, I can get, I can build an audience, I’m not getting banned from all these social media companies, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. That proves that this strategy is more effective because I’m not being attacked as much by the enemy.”

And it’s like if you’re not being as attacked by the enemy, that means that you’ve compromised! [chuckling] So it’s kind of a ridiculous logic, like the enemy has set the rules up of this game to prevent anything radical enough to actually challenge them from coming into existence.

So you’re like:

“Hey, look, if I just obey the rules of the game, the enemy doesn’t attack me as hard. My political strategy makes more sense than yours!”

Well, that’s basically like conservatism in a nutshell. Like, a lot of the time. It’s just like rationalizing cowardice, rationalizing the path of least resistance, of gaining personal advantage at the expense of creating the actual fundamental conflict between our position and the enemy position, which is ultimately necessary.

Like, this has to resolve into a radical polarisation of society where a massive portion of the White men and women of your country, where millions of them are willing to support Nazis or something equivalent to that. How are we going to get there? And if we can’t get there, I don’t believe that we’re ever going to be able to fundamentally have our values imposed upon the state in any meaningful sense.

Mark Collett: I’ll tell you what, Joe, I got to agree with you on this bit to a large degree, and I’ve said this to other people. And people got to understand this. If you go out to the public and say:

“We want X!”

And then people vote for you or don’t vote for you, okay, you know where you stand. Then if people do actually vote you in, you have a mandate to carry out whatever X was.

However, if you go to the public and say:

“Look, we’re selling X.”

And people say:

“Well, we don’t want X.”

You’re only going to get sort of two and a half percent.

And then you say to yourself:

“Well, that didn’t work out. Well, let’s water this down, let’s water this down!”

And then over time, you start selling something that’s very different, almost completely different to what you sold originally. If, then when you do get to power, or get a whiff of power, you try to do the old switcheroo and say:

“Well, you voted for this, but we’re going to give you that thing that you didn’t vote for, what we started off with all the way back then when you rejected us because we were selling product X, but now we’re selling, you know, completely different thing to you at the ballot box. But now we’re in, we’re going to give you the hardcore stuff that you never voted for!”

That won’t work. People would be absolutely outraged!

And I think that’s something that people don’t understand. I think the issue that you have is that people that have gone down that softly, softly route would find it difficult to do the things that they initially set out to do before they went on the road of watering it down.

[1:11:02]

And I’ll give you a perfect example. Marine Le Pen’s party in France. Well, Marine Le Pen’s party in France have basically stated that if you’ve got a French passport and you love France and you salute the flag, you’re French. Well, once you’ve said that, you’re never going to bring about mass deportations or any form of re-migration because it would be impossible to do you can’t then say to people:

“Well, actually, the only people who are French are people who are ethnically French that we now define as White French people.”

Because you’ve already given up that ground and people never voted for you for that. People would think that was an awful thing to do you know, probably a lot of your councilors, a lot of your elected officials would be like:

“What are you even doing?”

And I do think that if you have a radical programme and you ever want to put that radical programme forward and put it into action, you actually have to sell it as what it is if you try to sell it as something different, even if you do manage to get somewhere, you will never be able to get back to where you were and Institute that radical program.

So in many ways, Joel, what I’m saying is that I do have a lot of respect for you and the fact that you do have a radical programme and you’re not going to try to water that down because you understand that that wouldn’t work either.

And it’s quite funny as well, because every party that I have seen water things down, they haven’t necessarily achieve the success that they wanted to. So another great example of that is the British National Party. It achieved limited electoral success, very limited. Then eventually, when it wasn’t electorally successful, it was destroyed. And really, was it worth selling out on everything it believed in to get there and end up with nothing anyway?

So I do think there is a certain honour to standing on a patch of ground, claiming it as your own and being like:

“Well, we’ll stand here until the end, and if we win, we win. If we don’t. But if we win, we’re winning on our own merits.”

Joel Davis: And even for the people who want to water things down, my view is that if you want to, you need to maintain a kind of radical leadership. You need to have it at the very least within the Right-wing. You want the Right-wing base and people who are in Right-wing politics in every respect to have the maximum amount of rightward pressure, particularly obviously on the issues of race and related issues.

So basically you want to have a discussion that doesn’t have rules that disclude the Nazi. Why do people oppose the Nazis? They don’t oppose the Nazis or they don’t get freaked out by the Nazis because of what is Keith writing about, like how they treated Slavic people or something? Maybe if you’re in Poland, that’s the case, but in our, in the English speaking world, that isn’t what’s going on.

Mark Collett: I don’t follow Keith’s argument there because I’ve been involved in nationalism for a long time, and do you know how many Polish people I know that have attended events that could and would be described as National Socialist events? I’ve never found that really. I think that’s enough.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but sure, I’m not, I’m just saying that from the perspective of the English speaking world, that’s not what the controversy is built in the controversy fundamentally oscillates around the notion that the Nazis were the ultimate anti-semitic racist political force. And the other stigma, I guess, is to do with the authoritarian style of governance. Right. And that basically is where the stigma comes from.

So do you want a Right-wing that is willing to basically seize state power and use it against their enemies in a way that goes beyond the limits set for it by liberalism? Do you want a Right-wing that is radically racist? Do you want a Right-wing that is radically anti-semitic? Well, if you want these things, then you have to take the kind of moral training wheels off and allow us into the discourse and allow us to pressure the discourse in our direction. That’s the only way this is going to work. You’re not going to be able to cancel Nazis and also achieve those ends. Then at the very least, you’re undermining those efforts at the very least, because you’re creating the opposite pressure system.

But anyway, the other point that is often made around these subjects is that:

“Oh, well, the thing is that White people don’t consider genocide to be moral and they get freaked out by militarism.”

Was the term that Greg Johnson used after the stream the other night:

“It scares the hoes. Being a Nazi scares the hoes!”

And my response to that is obviously, huh?

Mark Collett: Who are the hoes?

Joel Davis: It’s a phrase like “scaring the hoes”. You never heard that before?

Mark Collett: No, mate, we say it’s like “spooks the cattle” or something like that. We’re British here, we don’t use words like “hoes”.

Joel Davis: Okay, well, it’s a funny phrase anyway.

Mark Collett: Gardening. A hoe is a gardening tool, my friend. It is not a we’re not in the ghetto tonight. [chuckling]

[1:16:52]

Joel Davis: But anyway. Yeah, but what my response to Greg was that:

“Well, there’s not going to be any non-hoe scaring solution to this.”

Like, we’re talking about an existential battle for the survival of our race. Taking on the entire political establishment, taking on the people who run the world and defeating them. It’s going to require militancy, it’s going to require aggression!

And if you don’t have that, you actually don’t have a basis for people who actually believe in you! Because you’re not actually projecting a sense of power or authority, or a fighting spirit. That’s what’s necessary.

If all you are a bunch of nerds in suits with ideas and with arguments, well, that isn’t actually the foundation of power. Like, you need to have good arguments. You need to be well presented. What you also need to have is a willingness to fight, a willingness to struggle, a willingness to suffer, a willingness to make sacrifices, and an aggression!

And you need to have a that needs to be rooted in what is fundamentally a confrontation with existential reality.

The problem that White people face most fundamentally is not that they don’t have the right ideas. It’s that they’re too cowardly to even come to the obvious conclusion. Because the obvious conclusion has very scary ramifications. If you accept the fact that we are ruled by traitors and hostile alien elements that hate us and want us dead as a people, that are purposefully executing a plan to eradicate our race from existence, and that basically there’s nobody in politics that really has our back, and that we have to build a grassroots movement from scratch under a hostile government to overthrow and resist it to the point that we can regain our existence. If you have to accept that reality, which is the reality, if you don’t accept that’s reality, you’re wrong. That’s the reality.

If you’re going to accept that you live in that world. That’s a scary world! That’s a very scary world to live in. That’s not something that makes you feel good. Right.

And so it feels a lot better to believe that isn’t necessarily the case, that actually:

“Oh, we just need to win the argument. Oh, we just need a better marketing strategy or whatever.”

Particularly if you’re a weak cunt, like if you’re a low testosterone male, you are going to be less likely to be able to accept reality because you are biologically predisposed to being more of a herd animal. You’re more afraid of standing against the collective, you’re more afraid of conflict, you’re more conflict avoidant.

And so you’re going to naturally psychologically bias towards a conflict avoidant strategy. And a sense of reality where:

“Oh, these people just aren’t making the right arguments! If you just made the right arguments, if you just said the correct assembly of words like what I say, then the people that hate us would be defeated in the battleground of ideas and we would win!”

No, no, no! The problem is that White people aren’t fucking fighting back! The problem is that our race are a bunch of pussies! Fundamentally! That every single day, millions of White people around the world make the decision to turn the blind eye, to take the paycheck, to keep their head down because they don’t want to pay the costs of sticking their head up and resisting. That’s why we’re in this fucking position! So many of our ancestors took the jew money or they, as I said, they basically let an insult on their honour occur and just let it happen. They didn’t react! And a whole series of those decisions were made again and again and again and again, to we get here!

So that’s why we’re in the position that we’re in. It’s our own fucking fault! It’s our own weakness fundamentally. It’s not because White people haven’t been convinced that it’s moral necessarily for them to continue existing.

The reality is that most White people like existing and don’t really like immigration and so on. It’s that they’re too scared to come to the conclusions that that implies. You know, so that’s what we need a movement that inspires people to have courage. It inspires people to express honour, that galvanises people and provides solidarity. Where if, okay, maybe when you’re the only guy that’s kind of standing up, that’s more scary, but if you’re standing up and you’re surrounded by brothers who are organised at scale, standing up beside you have a lot more confidence to stand up.

So it’s about how do we bring confidence back to the White man? How do we deal with this White demoralisation? How do, how do we deal with this White cowardice? To me, that’s what the movement is fundamentally about, in a kind of spiritual and cultural sense. It’s not about how do we have the best argument why mass immigration sucks! We’ve already won all those fucking arguments! The majority of people are against mass immigration. Everyone can see the society is failing. The current system has never been this illegitimate.

It’s not a question of arguments anymore, in my view, or it never was. It’s about creating a psychological and spiritual state to actually receive the world view and act on the worldview. And I would say I would finish with this as well. There are millions of Australians that have White nationalist or White nationalist adjacent views. How many of them do anything about it? That’s the issue! Is that they’re not actually fucking doing anything! It doesn’t matter that they’ve been convinced. If you convince someone the jews are running the media and running the banks and the White race is being replaced and they go:

“Yeah, that makes sense. I can see that.”

And then they just go back to work the next day and then turn the football on, and take the Mrs on a holiday and send their 2.3 [1.3] kids to the local school and they just continue on watching reality TV shows.

And what does it matter what they think in their brain? It’s not actually actualizing into a different way of life. It’s not turning into political resistance.

So everyone wants to convince these passive voters that maybe we’ll vote for a nationalist party if it was marketed to them in the right way under certain conditions. I want to appeal to people who are like:

“Hey, come and join me in the struggle for our existence. Devote your life to it!”

That’s what I’m doing. That’s what we actually need. I need fucking voters. I don’t need opinions. I need fighters. We need fighters!

[1:23:38]

Mark Collett: I mean, obviously by “fighters” you mean political fighters. People who are going to do things lawfully.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Mark Collett: Anyway, look, let’s do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet and you want to do the Superchat, please do you can donate via Odysee or Entropy. We’ll be reading all those out now. We’ve got about 35 minutes left. The first Superchat is one that was sent to me by a guy called SR, who gave $30. Thank you so much! And it’s something I wanted to raise first and separately with you, Joel, because I do have one disagreement with you on this.

You do talk about National Socialism a lot and about your belief system, which I respect. But one thing you seem very down on is working with other ethnic groups who are also National Socialists. Now I’ve always seen National Socialism as a movement.

Joel Davis: You mean non-Whites. Obviously I support working with other White ethnic groups. Obviously.

Mark Collett: Yeah, you don’t support working with non-White or other ethnic groups that are National Socialists. Now one thing, I’ve always found this a little bit strange because people like Hitler, George Lincoln, Rockwell, they obviously did. And I firmly believe that we should work with other ethnic groups that want peaceful separation.

And I also believe that if you look at National Socialism fundamental strands that I opened the show discussing, where I said there’s the national and there is the social, that does apply to everybody.

So if you went to say a country in the Middle East or you know, a country in the Far East, and those people wanted a homogeneous, closed bordered society where their people worked hand in hand to do the best for them and obviously accept expressed their culture. You see, and I think people like sort of David Duke, Kevin MacDonald, many others would agree with me when I say this, that really we do want a multicultural world, but we just want everyone in their own place, in their own homelands. And we want sort of a world of independent, proud people that celebrate their own cultures. We just don’t want all of that on our soil.

Obviously we do have a time limit tonight. I’m sure you and I could debate this all night long, but I do think it’s kind of slightly antithetical to sort of National Socialism as an ideology to oppose other ethnic groups that agree with that agree sort of with the idea of peaceful separation and that everyone should have their own place in the world.

Joel Davis: And my position has never been that we can’t have good relations with non-White countries.

Like for example, Australia has a very strong military alliance with Japan. After the United States, they’re probably our second most important military ally because of the fact that we share a region and various other reasons. And I wholeheartedly support that and I actually respect Japanese culture as well in many respects. But even if I didn’t, from a practical standpoint, that’s what’s in Australia’s interests, is to have a strong alliance with Japan. Well, obviously, once great enemies, we fought World War II against each other, but now that’s how I see it.

So I’m not opposed to that on the basis of like some kind of trivial racism. But within Australian politics or within the politics of any White country, what is fundamentally awry with Whites is that Whites can’t figure out how to do anything themselves. Like, just yesterday I went to a Celtic festival, right? It was celebrating Scottish and Irish culture, obviously the weekend after St. Patrick’s Day. Maybe that’s why they organised it. It was more Scottish than Irish, this particular festival. And the kilts were on and bagpipes were going. They’re doing Scottish strongman competitions and things like that.

Anyway, I’m watching the bagpipes and there’s these dudes that are like:

“Oh, I really value my Scottish ancestry. And I got the whole regalia with the long socks and I’ve learnt how to play bagpipes. I’m in this bagpipe playing collective or whatever, and we’re marching around in time playing bagpipes.”

And then he walks over to his Asian girlfriend or wife or something. And it’s like, so that’s how important your Scottish ancestry is to you, is it, mate? And then I see like a fucking Indian guy next to him with the bagpipe looking, like completely out of place next to all these like ginger dudes and stuff.

And it’s like, what the fuck are we doing here? Can we just have fucking bagpipes? No, we can’t have bagpipes! We’ve got to share the fucking bagpipes on the Celtic festival day with fucking Indians! Like, White people need to have our own shit!

We need to have in particular our own political representation where it’s just for us! We can’t have a political party or we can’t have a political lobby group or some kind of political representation if we can’t even have that, where it’s just for us. How the fuck are we going to have a country just for us? That’s step one! We should be able to have an organisation where only we can be apart and everyone else, too fucking bad! You’re not involved. This is for us, it’s not for you. If we can’t be exclusionary on some level, how are we going to build an exclusionary politics? It doesn’t make any sense.

[1:28:58]

Now, that doesn’t mean that, as I said, non-White groups in other countries we can’t have a peaceful amicable relationship. But if they’re in another country, they can’t really do that much to help us on a domestic level, they really can’t. When we seize state power or something, then we can have an amicable relationship.

But in the process of our domestic political scenario, all that’s relevant is can we get White people organised at scale? That’s all that’s actually relevant. If we can take the country back. If we can’t take the country back. Everything else is a fucking distraction! If we’ve got, if we can only organise like a tiny portion of Whites and we’re going and wasting our time going and meeting with like some random group of Muslims and some random group of blacks and so on that are completely irrelevant to our struggle, it’s like, what are we fucking doing here? We should be going out and meeting with Whites. We should be going out and working and building up White communities, talking to Whites, converting Whites to our worldview, organising Whites into our organisation.

White power is the name of the fucking game. This is a movement for self-determination! That means it’s a movement that we, where we are determining our own destiny has to come from our strength. And if White people are constantly looking to non-Whites for help or for solutions and being inclusive towards them, it’s just reproducing the same fundamental problem., …

Mark Collett: I think you’re misrepresenting the argument. It’s not about being inclusive. You’re sort of getting very worked up about inclusivity and things like that it’s not about being inclusive.

I’ll tell you this now, Joel, and this is a fact, right? I could introduce you to a hundred Whites, okay, and you could explain your belief of National Socialism, what you think it is, and try and sell it to them. And then I could sit you with a hundred, say, blacks or Asians, and you could explain the same. And I bet per capita you’d get more ethnic minorities saying that’s a reasonable argument than you would with Whites.

And I’ll tell you this now, and this might be a hard pill to swallow, but I’ve gone and met black people who’ve invited me on their podcasts. I’ve discussed things with people from other groups and cultures. And when they talk to me, they never call me a Nazi or they never like have a go at me. When they inquire about our views, they are genuinely interested to hear what we say. And often the most pushback I get and the most screeching of the word “Nazi” is actually from brainwashed Whites.

And I’m not saying this because I want to get in this debate now. I mean, I’d love to do a debate with you on this at some time. [chuckling] It might be fun if people want that, you know. But what I’m saying, …

Joel Davis: Mark, I’ve met heaps of non-Whites and I say this stuff and I’ve been pretty consistent about this. I literally go on my stream and say:

“If you’re non-White, turn the stream off. I don’t want you watching my streams. Get out of the live chat!”

They still do it. They still do it, right? So it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter how racist I get. There’s still a bunch of non-Whites that are like:

“This White guy is cooking!”

So what? What are they going to do to help?

Mark Collett: Joel, I think what you’re saying here is also antithetical to your cause, and I’ll tell you why. When I’ve seen the National Socialists, they were impeccably well dressed, very well spoken, very, very polite and they wouldn’t address people in that manner.

And I think in selling what you’re trying to sell, taking the kind of David Duke road is the better route. Now I think if you look at David Duke, he’s probably, well, he is the most famous and prominent post-war White nationalist, you know, post the man with the mustache. Duke is the big man! And I don’t think anyone has been more popular amongst Arabs, amongst different White ethnic groups and even amongst blacks than David Duke. David Duke is somebody who’s respected by people of different racial groups all over the world for what he pushes.

And I think that’s more, … When I first got involved with the BNP there was this heavy National Socialist undercurrent in the organisation. But everybody there saw, they didn’t see non-Whites as just a simple sort of like enemy. And I think that’s a counterpoint., …

Joel Davis: I’m not saying, but I’m not saying that they’re all enemies. What I’m saying is that I want to have a space where White people organise our own politics amongst ourselves.

Mark Collett: And I’m not saying you shouldn’t have that.

Joel Davis: I’m trying to practice, I’m just trying to practice my ideas. Because [words unclear] they’re not part of it.

Mark Collett: The Superchat was more about working with people.

And when I see people like George Lincoln, Rockwell who work with Nation of Islam and stuff. I’ve always seen National Socialism as a movement that will work with people from other ethnic groups as long as they are ideologically coherent.

Joel Davis: What ones that live in our countries?

Mark Collett: Well, the fact is, the way we are, the way it is now is, unfortunately, there is a reality to this.

Joel Davis: If they support us, if they really support us, they wouldn’t live in our countries. They just move home. It’s not that fucking hard!

[1:34:46]

Mark Collett: I don’t think it’s as simple as that.

And I think one of the things that we would have to do moving forward if we were to get to a position where we held real power and real sway amongst the Whites in our nation is you would need to sit down with people from other ethnic groups and plot a way to chart peaceful separation. Because it ain’t gonna be a matter of, …

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. When we’ve got a serious amount of Whites organised and we have a serious political movement and we actually have strength and we actually can say we speak on behalf of Whites because we’ve got enough support and we got a chance of taking political power, then we can sit down with these groups and try and work out how we can send them back in a way that’s reasonable for everyone. But why are we doing it now? Just a complete waste of time right now. We’re not anywhere near that position where that becomes relevant.

What we need to be focusing upon now is ourselves and getting ourselves organised and creating spaces where White people can talk about what’s in White interests amongst ourselves, where everyone else is excluded. We’ll let you know when we’re ready to have a chat. Is my view.

Mark Collett: You know, it was interesting because before the Syrian government fell in Syria, I actually did a stream with one of the with one of the very influential men from the Syrian government, and he agreed overwhelmingly with the points that we were making and said:

“Look you should be sending back all the Syrians that came to your country.”

He said that. And I do think that politeness and a willingness to sort of work with other people who want peaceful separation is far more in line historically with what National Socialism was.

Joel Davis: I’m not saying we should be impolite. I don’t think it’s just, …

Mark Collett: Otherwise, you just become sort of this like pastiche of National Socialism where you’re walking down the street with your tattoos on your face and your bother boots on and you’re shouting at people and it’s basically all you expect at that point is Steven Spielberg to pop out from a lamp post and shout:

“Lights, camera, action!”

And it goes on the TV and it’s kind of like negative reinforcement of what, …

Joel Davis: It’s not negative. My worldview is very simple. I believe White people collectively have the strength to control our own destinies. And all that is required is for us to have the self consciousness and strength of will to do. So that’s my message. We don’t actually need any of these other groups’ help. We actually don’t need their help. That doesn’t mean that I want to kill them all. We don’t need their help. We need our own help!

So when we start helping ourselves and we get strong, then from a position of strength we can sit down at the table and try and work out and negotiate, what’s ours and what isn’t ours with these other groups. But we’re not in a position to sit down and have that negotiation yet.

So it’s an utterly pointless waste of time and a lot of energy. I’ve seen this from people like, I don’t want to name names. I know that for example, Lucas Gage is kind of, we had debates like this back in the day and he’s kind of recognised like a shift in strategy is needed to a large extent. But all this energy went into trying to convince all these non-Whites that jews are the real enemy, not Whites and they should ally with us and so on. And it all amounts to nothing.

Because at the end of the day, they have their own people, they have their own perspective, they have their own concerns. And if they were more concerned about us than their own people, there’d have to be something wrong with them.

So there’s no point sitting down and negotiating with them from position of:

“Empathize with us! Poor Whitey. We need, …”

Like that’s fundamentally weak and it’s ridiculous! We want to develop strength!

And then we can sit down from a position of strength and say, these are our interests. Here’s the benefits of cooperating with us and going along with us. And here’s what happens if you don’t cooperate with us. What would you like to do? And we can sit down as gentlemen and be very rational about it and very gentlemanly and everyone can wear suits and shake hands and no one’s calling each other names. That’s what I want to do.

But I see so much time wasted in this movement from banging on about how we stand with the Palestinians and we stand with the Syrians and obviously we oppose Israel, we don’t want to support Israel, the parasite that is Israel and zionism.

But at the same time I actually, it’s kind of their problem at the end of the day, that’s their side of the world. I care about my countries or our countries, I care about our people and securing our future. That’s what I’m focused on. I’m not focused upon giving all of this moral and emotional energy to non-Whites. That is really the problem with Whites. We’ve given way too much moral and emotional energy to others and nowhere near enough to ourselves! I am the person that comes along and says:

“That’s fundamentally wrong! I’m going to have a pure version of my worldview and express it to you.”

Because I fundamentally have confidence in our own race. I don’t think we need anybody else, we don’t need anybody else to achieve what is necessary. If we get Whites organised in Australia at scale, we take Australia back. Same thing in Britain, same thing everywhere else.

[1:40:16]

Mark Collett: I’ll say this. I’ll say this right, I respect your optimism, but this is where I fear that you’re going wrong, in that you said something there about sort of, who cares about the Israeli issue, who cares about this? I’ll tell you this now, if you don’t cut the strings on your puppet politicians that are all dancing to the Israeli tune because that’s who hold the strings is Israel, then you’re never ever going to be free.

And one of the things, one of the reasons why I thought this was an interesting debate tonight is because the vast majority of people who are, I’m not saying all, but the vast majority of people who are antithetical to everything you’re saying, who are opposed to everything that you are, Joel, are busy cucking on this issue whilst all sucking up to the Zionists!

And you know why I believe that you were kicked off TwitterX It wasn’t because, you’re pro-White, it’s because you’re NS and that’s the step they don’t want to allow. It’s because you weren’t one of the people saying:

“We’ll look, if we just get rid of the Muslims and treat them really badly and shout rude words at them, everything will be fixed. Hey!”

Which is what the people on Twitter and X say in abundance. And I’m just saying I’m not saying that we need to be friends with everyone, but the fact is most, most, …

Joel Davis: I’ve talked to non-Whites before. I’ve had plenty of amicable chats with non-Whites who are woke on the jews or whatever.

But what I’m saying is I don’t think you can really build a politics out of these conversations. The politics that we can build is White people coming together for White interests. That’s the politics I believe in.

So that’s the name of the game!

And I think too much energy gets wasted if you deviate from that too far. That doesn’t mean, it doesn’t mean being rude to non-Whites, particularly ones that are sympathetic. I’ve met sympathetic Asians, blacks, Arabs, whatever. And I don’t call them slurs and like punch them in the face or something. I’m a supreme gentleman. But they’re not coming to the NSN rally. [chuckling] You know, they’re not coming to the, …

Mark Collett: I’m not asking that, but the reason you’re not on, if you look at the groups that have been banned off X, if you look at the individuals that have been banned off X, they’re all people that went beyond what is the confirmed and allowed parameters. And the confirmed and allowed parameters on that godforsaken platform, are that ultimately you can be pro-your own country as long as you’re pro-your country being ruled by Zionists in Israel. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Yes, of course.

Mark Collett: And by taking the stance you took, … You see the problem with NS and what they feel fear about National Socialism is National Socialism by its very definition is anti-being ruled by Israel. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Of course.

Mark Collett: It’s anti-being ruled by anybody that is from another group.

And the fact is they don’t mind on X now, if you advocate for sort of a White America, or a White Britain, a as long as that White America or largely White Britain is still being ruled by a little fiefdom in the Middle East.

Joel Davis: But they also don’t mind if you advocate for Palestine like a Leftist, on the basis of the poor Palestinians and look at what’s happening to them.

The distinction between my view is that I oppose Israel and zionism not on the basis of sympathy with Palestinians, but on the basis of asserting White interests. We gain absolutely nothing from Israel! We gain absolutely nothing from our support of zionism! And we, our entire political system has been hijacked by it. How much blood and treasure have we expended in invading Iraq and all this other nonsense that has absolutely zero benefit to us? And Zionists control the media. Zionists control the political process, even in Australia.

So I speak about it from the basis of Australian interests, White interests, not from the perspective of sympathy with Palestine or Syria. Because the thing is, number one, that’s the fundamentally wrong orientation. We should be relativizing everything in politics towards what’s good for us. That’s nationalism.

Number two, also there’s another idea which is that:

“Well, yeah, we don’t really care about Palestine or we don’t really care about Syrians, but we should pretend to because at the moment it’s going to cause problems for jews, right? So we should pretend to?”

And my response to that is not only do I dislike playing games, like manipulative games, I believe in authenticity. But number two, the average patriotic White guy that I know, doesn’t give a shit about fucking Palestine or Syrians. They don’t like Muslims in general.

And so if I start positioning myself like a Leftist, pretending that I care about these things, they’re actually going to get turned off and I’m actually pushing them into the arms of the Tommy Robinsons of the, …

Mark Collett: Joel! Joel! Right, you see, this is where, if you don’t mind me saying, your argument kind of falls to pieces.

Because if you’re saying you can’t take a principled stand over Palestinian children being killed because it might turn off Grug nationalists, well, you know what also turns off Grug nationalists? Hitler and swastikas. So if now we’re trying to appeal to the Grug nationalists with:

“Well, let the Israelis bomb Palestinian schools, I’m not going to say anything about that.”

You might as well drop your Swazi and your NS stuff as well because that also turns off Grug nationalists.

[1:46:25]

Joel Davis: Not really. What I’m saying is that what the perspective that they haven’t heard, what they’ve heard is “fuck Muslims” on one side and then on the other side “it’s a jew Muslim dispute and should we sympathize with the jews or should we sympathize with the Muslims?” I’m coming along with the Third Position of “let’s sympathize with ourselves”. We don’t have to pick jew or Muslim. We can pick us! And that is the correct position. Right? Because fundamentally it’s a movement for us. We’re not a Muslim movement, not a jewish movement. We’re a movement for White people. So I’m coming along with that position and saying:

“Well, let’s get outside of that false dichotomy. Let’s take our own side here.”

That’s actually a very compelling message that has a lot of appeal, I think, actually.

And it’s important to deal with the anti-Muslim, pro-jewish element on the Right, which we’re directly competing with, in particular.

Thirdly, it’s actually what I really believe. None of us are willing to go. Maybe some people are idiotic enough to be doing to do this, I don’t know. But pretty much none of us are willing to actually go and fight for any of these Muslim countries in their struggles of national independence or contribute anything really of that much significance beyond firing off a few tweets of moral support.

However, we’re willing to fight and die for our countries. So let’s just be honest here! Let’s just be honest here and just, and talk about it in terms of our interests and in our nation. We don’t need to go and adjudicate genocides on the other side of the planet. Is everyone getting that passionate about the morality of the Rwandan genocide or what the Azerbaijanis are doing to the Armenians or what the Chinese are doing to the Uyghurs? No! No one’s getting that passionate about any of that. You’re pretending to care about the Palestinians because you hate jews, which is, I understand it, that’s fine, that’s great! But on a certain level. But on another level, it’s like, let’s be real here. We don’t actually give a shit about Palestinians. We actually don’t. We’re just pretending to, because we don’t like Israel.

So why don’t we just talk about the real reasons why we don’t like Israel, the pro-White reasons, and just cut the bullshit!

Mark Collett: Well, I don’t think it is bullshit! I think, having a decent, rounded worldview is part of the National Socialist mindset. I think part of the National Socialist mindset historically was having a rounded worldview. And all I’m saying is that I don’t want to see my people genocided. I don’t want to see millions of people coming here from all over the world and wiping out indigenous Brits. But nor do I want to see Israeli jets wiping out Palestinians, and nor do I want to see Israel destabilising the Middle East for the 20th time and millions more Muslims pouring out of the Middle East into countries like Britain, Germany, and France!

Joel Davis: But it wasn’t Israel doing it, you wouldn’t care, Mark. Like, if it was Egypt doing it.

Mark Collett: Well, of course I’d care if it was anyone doing it. And it’s creating an endless stream of people who are then funneled into Europe. I don’t want it happening. You see, I don’t want Western countries selling weapons to Africa so that they destabilise their countries and then all the people coming flowing here. What you want is a world where there are defined borders, people have a place in the world. And you’re constantly not kicking hornets nests. Because those hornets nests, when they’re kicked, it’s our kids that end up getting stung.

And fundamentally I think that when I see what jews do, and to say that I don’t care who does its completely wrong! You know, if you look at my history, my political history, I oppose the war in Iraq. I oppose the war in Afghanistan. I opposed American invasions of numerous countries. Why? Because I think all of this is part of sort of a wider, sort of globalist, internationalist agenda, which isn’t good for White people either. You know, ultimately the most important thing is what is good for White people.

Joel Davis: Yeah. Good for White people. That’s why we should oppose on the basis of its bad for us, rather than going on about, …

Mark Collett: But Israel’s dominance in the Middle East is bad for White people!

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree. We’re not disagreeing about opposing Israel, obviously. What are the reasons? Like, how are we framing it? You know, I just believe in framing things.

Mark Collett: It’s bad for White people. Because if you, …

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But that’s what I’m saying. Bang on about the poor Palestinians all the time. I’m not saying you do this.

Mark Collett: No. What was the first thing that Israel demanded when they wanted to empty the whole of Gaza?

The first thing they did was meet people like Tony Blair and talk about sending 2 million Palestinians to Europe. It’d be disastrous! We’re on the knife edge. Why would you want any more of them here? You know, I oppose Israel’s dominance in the Middle East. It’s bad for White people.

But I also don’t like seeing pictures of Palestinian babies with their limbs blown off. As a father, that sickens me! And people who can do that are just demonic! There is that aspect.

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay, but like I’m, …

Mark Collett: But I don’t want to go around seeing children blown to pieces by sort of demonic warmongering Zionists who think it’s hilarious and then want to sell up the little bit of land that they used to have to build condos on so Trump and his stupid son-in-law can rub their greedy hands and make another real estate deal.

[1:52:20]

Joel Davis: I mean that’s all fine and reasonable, but nevertheless, I think you can also see what I’m saying here, which is that I think we need to anchor our politics just fundamentally in ourselves and our own interests. And what are we actually concretely willing to fight for, and not. Because there’s been this attitude that’s been too pervasive of this world police attitude where we’ve got to morally dictate to all of these non-White countries what they’re like, how their political systems need to be structured, which is a way to anchor us into these foreign conflicts. And I know you’re opposing things. I know you’re taking the opposite view to the Americans.

Mark Collett: You are totally wrong in what you’re saying.

Joel Davis: What?

Mark Collett: The whole world police mentality comes from Israel. The whole world police., …

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Mark Collett: We had two wars with Iraq, with the globalist American system run by Israel being the world police! I’m not saying we need to be the world police. I’m saying we need to morally oppose foreign invasions, …

Joel Davis: But the Left-wing, Right-wing distinction in the mainstream has been either you sympathize with this set of foreign victims or this set of foreign victims. Like we ought to take its side in these, in all of these foreign conflicts where there’s one side that the Leftists like and one side that the Zionists like. And then it flips back and forth between who we’re supporting and it’s like:

“You know what? Fuck all this bullshit! Australia first, America First, whatever, right?”

Our military and our, and our money and our blood should be expended when we are attacked, when our people are attacked to defend us and nothing else! That is what we need to say, …

Mark Collett: No, you just said screw the world police mentality. The world police mentality is the globalist Zionist mentality where White soldiers are used to go to places like Iraq where they either die, come back with some kind of PTSD, or their legs and arms missing to serve the Zionist agenda.

Joel Davis: I don’t want to become like some communist foreign policy where we just have the foreign policy of the Soviet Union, if it still existed or something, and we just, whatever the brown people that the Zionist Americans support, we support the other group of brown people and we play all these like team sports and waving all these weird foreign flags from countries don’t even understand the language of it just becomes utterly contrived and alienating.

And it’s also disingenuous. We don’t actually give a shit, on a fundamental level. We’re not willing to go and fight for it like we are for our own country. So why can’t we just anchor it in nationalism, and ourselves?

Mark Collett: But what are you talking about?

Joel Davis: Ike that’s a way better approach.

Mark Collett: What I’m saying is nationalism is a non-Aggression. We anchor what we’re doing in what’s best for us. What’s best for us isn’t going out and being the global police for the Zionist state of Israel.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s also not investing all of your emotional energy in the plight of other foreign peoples that are the victims in these narratives either. We’ve got to invest our emotional energy and our advocacy in our own people.

And that means like you only have a certain amount of care, you only have a certain amount of love you can feel as a human being. You have a finite amount of energy. I believe in investing 100% of that in ourselves. That is going to secure our future.

Mark Collett: What bit of not investing time and energy in ourselves is being supportive of these wars? Opposing these foreign wars is being supportive of White people, because we are the ones who pay for them.

Joel Davis: I’m saying I oppose the wars. I’m just saying I should oppose them. The reasons that we list, we should just list pro-White reasons. That’s all I’m saying. We should oppose them from a pro-White perspective. That’s all I’m saying.

Mark Collett: So at no point in your world do you look at those Palestinian kids being blown to pieces and think:

“Well, that’s also another good reason to oppose it.”

You know, seeing babies have their limbs blown off, that’s not a good reason as well. I mean I’ve said like it’s bad because we pay for.

Joel Davis: That’s just kind of like an emotional thing. Like I tried to look at things in a very rational way. Like at the end of the day horrible things happen all over the world all the time. I can’t care about all of them. I have to decide what I care about what I don’t care about. Even though there’s horrible things, it’s like:

“Wow, if that was me, that would be horrible!”

Like you can empathize, but at the end of the day, I don’t consider the plight of the Palestinian people to be my problem. I’m not Muslim, I’m not Palestinian, they’re not my people. I care about my people.

So I wouldn’t be willing to go and do anything about it in a direct sense. I would be willing to do something about it in the sense of opposing Israel on the basis of liberating our people from the yoke of their occupational influence over our government institutions. I obviously completely oppose supporting Israel in every possible conceivable direction.

[1:57:31]

And actually if we just cut Israel off from a pro-White perspective in our countries and let the Muslims have their way with them, and sit back with the popcorn and enjoy the destruction of Israel, obviously. Right? Because that’s what would happen. They only exist because of their parasitism upon us, because we defend them. If we remove our security guarantees and stop giving them money and weapons and sending our people to go and fight in wars for them, they’re fucked! So that’s a situation I’ll be very happy with and then if you see a bunch of Israeli children with their limbs blown off, are we going to be crying about that too? No, we’re not going to be crying about it because at the end of the day, they’re not our fucking people! They made their bed, they lie in it. It’s their problem. Whether they’re right or wrong, it’s their fucking problem!

So for me, I care about White children and a future for White children and that’s that. And you could say that’s kind of harsh. But you have to draw the line somewhere in life.

It’s the same thing of I have children, I’m going to care a hell of a lot more about them. Like if my kid breaks his arm, it’s going to be the biggest deal in the world and I’ve got to make sure he gets to the hospital and I take care of the kid and so on. If some random kid breaks their arm, I’ll help him and do first aid and call the ambulance or whatever, maybe call the hospital and check on him. But I’m not going to like basically preside over his entire recovery process because he’s not my kid, right?

So like there’s like, there’s scales of concern that you can have for others. And at a certain point, you reach the point where if a kid breaks his arm in Perth, on the other side of the country, okay, well, some kid broke his arm in Perth. Like, I can’t. I don’t really give a fuck, right. It’s nothing to do with me. On a certain level, it’s sad that kids break their arms sometimes, but you stop caring at a certain point. You know, your obligations end, your responsibilities end as a human being at a certain point.

And it’s important that we reinforce that, because that’s really fundamental to the nationalist worldview and what’s been perverted in the minds of Whites through the way the media portrays things and the way that a lot of these discussions are carried out, where they’re carried out in these universal humanitarian language all the time, as opposed to carrying them out in terms of what are our interests, what are our responsibilities, who we are ultimately defending, and what’s beyond the scope of our responsibility. And that’s all I’m advocating for.

Mark Collett: Well, I can tell you this now. Every single nationalist movement in the world that was an ethno-nationalist movement at the time when there was the Iraq war, the Afghanistan war, were completely opposed to those and were completely opposed to that judeo-American globalism for a variety of different reasons. But if you’re not, you’re not, and that’s it.

So we’ll move on to the next question. ThinRedLine gave $14 and said:

“Great discussion Joel. Have you asked Keith for debate?”

Joel Davis: Yeah, a few people reached out, including Elijah Schaffer wanted to host the debate. You wanted to host the debate. And so I brought it up to him, and then he was like:

“Well, you know, it could be good for exposure, but I don’t know if I really want to be like positioning myself as attacking our own side or something.”

Which I don’t know how that really makes sense when, like, you started the debate, like, why not? Why not finish it? Like, if we’re gonna do these essays, and he put another essay out today, another essay on the same subject, which is good. I like doing the essay stuff, but it’s like, surely let’s actually hammer it out in a debate. I think a lot of people would tune in for that. I think, particularly because Keith and I are longtime associates, it’d be interesting.

Mark Collett: The difference between a debate and writing an essay is a debate is a proper race where you’re out in the fresh air and you’re running against somebody who’s running hard against you. Writing an article and sticking up it online, he’s just doing a time trial on an indoor track. You know, it’s easy, it’s safe, and you avoid sort of any conflict or embarrassment and you minimise the number of variables that can go wrong.

So ultimately you don’t end up falling flat on your face or being publicly humiliated by coming second, 3rd, 4th, or being, you know, everyone’s saying you didn’t do so well. Because all you do is keep doing your time trial until you get the result you think is good enough to post online. You do that, everyone claps and it’s very controlled.

I think a lot of people fear debate because debate isn’t as controlled. Debate, you can throw some curveballs in there and that can be embarrassing for people.

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think it’s necessarily embarrassing. Like obviously he feels his position is correct. So he feels, he has the arguments. Obviously I feel the same way. So like, why not test it? And a gentlemanly debate, obviously.

[2:02:21]

Mark Collett: That’s what I’m saying. Test it. That’s what I’m saying. It needs to be tested. Simply writing sort of like letters to each other online I don’t think is as instructive or as fun as a debate. And if Elijah Schaffer says he’s going to do it, he’s got a fantastic platform. You should do it on there. Simple.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Mark Collett: Thin Red line. Okay, we’re gonna have to get through these Superchats because we’re past the two hour mark now. ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

“We can’t have ethno-nationalism without taking down the myths surrounding World War II, because every time you ask for closed borders or re-migration, yours will be met by this is NS and it will lead to the Holocaust!”

I agree with that.

I’ve got to say this, and this is another reason why I find it so interesting that Keith came out with this now, I don’t think there’s been more, I don’t think in my lifetime there’s ever been more sort of public condemnation of sort of the Holocaust narrative and public questioning of the Holocaust narrative as there is now.

And I think the questioning of that, and I don’t think anyone says like nothing happened whatsoever! But the questioning of the Holocaust industry, the questioning of the more salacious stories that surround the Holocaust, I think is something which you know, does demystify this whole “nationalism bad because it leads to this”.

And again, I find it interesting that at a time when this is happening, this is being said. What do you think about that? About the sort of demystifying of the Holocaust and the fact that is something that fundamentally has always held back post-war nationalism?

Joel Davis: Well, absolutely! It’s a key component. It’s also obviously a reinforcement of specifically why you can’t criticise jewish power, that like if you criticise jews that that is somehow the first domino in the second Holocaust or something. And so it creates this injunction that gives them all these special exemptions to get away with what they get away with without critique, or at least like public mainstream critique. And that obviously is really melting it down in a big way because I think jewish power is becoming so explicit now that there seems to be a lot of awakening to it and a lot of people are starting to break ranks and start to talk about it in at least in a controlled sense.

And so then obviously the Holocaust gets brought up and therefore a lot more critical discussion around the Holocaust is taking place. And the Holocaust narrative obviously is very flimsy and it hasn’t actually stood up to a open, fair, reasonable public scrutiny because that hasn’t been allowed to take place. In most countries in Europe it’s not even legal to question it. And in the places where it is legal, like here or in Britain or in America if you want to be a historian that works in university and gets your books published by a mainstream publisher or whatever, and have a successful career as a historian, if you touch Holocaust revisionism, you can forget about that, right?

So even though you can technically still do it and you won’t get thrown in prison, nevertheless it’s career suicide! And so there’s a massive injunction.

And also people then who do take a Holocaust revisionist narrative, no one’s going to platform them to have debates against the regular historians. And the regular historians will gatekeep them out and won’t debate them and so on and so it’s very difficult for there to have an open and Frank public discourse. And as soon as anyone weighs into this subject, it’s super controversial and doesn’t take place.

If you had a completely controversy, free, open, rational space where this could be debated, it would crumble, right? It would completely crumble! You know, chimneys that aren’t connected, wooden doors. I mean, the list goes on. I mean, it’s ridiculous! So it can’t stand up to scrutiny.

So even if, when it gets a little bit of critical light shone on it, people do a few Google searches and think critically a little bit, and they say:

“Wait, wait a second, this is all bullshit!”

And particularly when you can see the political role that it’s being leveraged for. Like it’s an idea that creates political power for a particular group. So you should always be sceptical of that. When an idea is being leveraged to generate a particular political outcome, well then you can’t just take it at face value. Which is quite obvious. And I think a lot of people can sense that.

But I’m noticing a big shift where like older people as well, you know, older people in my life, in my friend’s life who were banging on about how the Holocaust was bullshit five years ago, ten years ago, and they weren’t having a bar of it.

Now they’re like:

“Oh I saw this documentary and did you know this?”

And then now they’re bringing up all these Holocaust revisionist facts and like weighing into the subject. There seemed to be a shift in the mood, which is obviously a very good thing. And at this point, White Identity Politics is going mainstream in many respects, at least in a discursive sense. Critical discourse of jewish power is going mainstream, at least in a discursive sense.

The only thing really that’s left is the rehabilitation of National Socialism itself being pushed into the mainstream. That’s really the last and most robust discursive gate-keeping that still exists. And so insofar as people like us that are trying to like push that across the line, it’s really about breaking that enemy control of the discourse. Even if you don’t agree with National Socialism, if you’re at least on our side, you should at least get out of the way and allow us to try and like push that through. Or actually you should be helping! Because open discussion space where we can at least consider National Socialism rationally and openly, even if you are critical of it, is still better for us than what currently exists.

[2:08:21]

Mark Collett: Okay, we’ve got another question from It Was Made Up who gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

“There’s one thing missing from this conversation and that’s Keith. Do you think he’ll do a stream with you about this? He seemed to be indicate he wanted to put this to bed today. With his SubStack today. So maybe not.”

Well, we’ve already kind of answered that but thank you for the Superchat. Jagdeep Jano gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

“Hey Joel. Tom recently spoke on Keith Woods cringe worthy and humiliating and cringe-worthy DMs that were leaked by an adult worker he caught feelings for named Slayter. She dated rappers and was disowned by her family. Why did Keith caught her and fall in love with her? Could you psychoanalyze this?”

Joel Davis: It’s nonsense! Next Superchat?

Mark Collett: What’s nonsense? Having feelings for a girl like that or the Superchatters?

Joel Davis: Oh, just like, just go on about bullshit!

Mark Collett: You know what Joel? You’re the [chuckling] hardest person to make laugh in the whole world! That was obviously meant to be sort of like a humourous Superchat. And my response to it was humourous. It’s like obviously it was a joke. You can’t psychoanalyze something like that. I believe Keith was just being polite to her and she thought she’d got a big own by leaking her Superchats. But the motto or the moral of said story is, if you have a complete skank like that, don’t treat them with the respect they don’t deserve. How’s that for a hoe owning comment, as you youngsters may say.

Joel Davis: Yeah. True.

Mark Collett: Arab Social Nationalist gave $1.88. Thank you so much! He said:

“Perhaps what’s happening here is that figures on the Right are struggling with the terrible truth that is crystallizing in front of them. There is no Parliamentary or Democratic way out of the crisis of modernity. NS is necessary precisely because it is revolutionary.”

Joel Davis: Yep, that’s one of my key points.

Mark Collett: White Bracer gave $20. Thank you so much! And he said:

“Hashtag stream Starfield team and he qualified that by saying Australia is Starfield.”

Well thank you very much. DerCherusker gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

“Great debate and powerful takes. I agree with Joel. The watered down version won’t work.”

Thank you so much! Jagdeep Jano gave another $5. Thank you so much! And said:

“People are open to Europa being fact checked, but Keith was saying bad stuff like Hitler was anti-Slavic and jews don’t have a monopoly on central banks or gold global finance. He was parroting Wikipedia. I suggest a two on two bare knuckle boxing fight. Mark and Joel versus Keith and Alec Yerbery.”

[chuckling] I’ve seen Joel in real life. He the weird thing about Joel is some people look bigger on stream and then they turn out to be small in real life. Like people always say to me that I look a lot bigger on stream but in real life I’m a lot smaller. Joel’s the other way around. Like when you first meet him in real life I couldn’t get over how sort of tall and well built he is. I think, if me and Joel were double teaming anyone in a sort of a bare knuckle fight, I’d be very, very pleased being on Joel’s side. He’s a sizable guy and has a good weight advantage. Arab Social Nationalist gave a $1.88 again. Thank you so much! He said:

“If the answer to an existential crisis is not revolutionary, then it isn’t the answer. You cannot accept that Whites are on the brink of extinction and at the same time insist that the response should be as polite and acceptable as possible. Makes no sense. Conservatism is poison.”

Well thank you very much. Mitch gave $3. Thank you so much my friend. He said:

“Hi, great great stream. Question to Joel. You said you went to India as a teenager. How come you went there?”

Joel Davis: Oh, I was raised in as a Protestant Christian and it was a kind of charity type arrangement that the Church that I went to was involved with. So it was under the auspices of basically helping out underprivileged children and so on. And I guess my parents encouraged me to go because they thought it would be enriching experience or whatever. And it was an experience that only made me detest [chuckling] that group of people more than maybe I otherwise would have. But although living in Australia, it’s not like you need to go to India to know what Indians are like.

Mark Collett: Beanie wearing Australian buffoon, you make me sick! I was really sick! Do you know, do you know what? Do you know? I find even more sickening than seeing Palestinians having their arms and legs blown off is goofy White teenagers going to places like India to wipe their brows and assist them with medical aid. You liberal Aussie! [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Well actually there’s a statue of one of my ancestors in London in Trafalgar Square, Charles Napier. And he actually conquered Pakistan. He was the commander in chief of British forces in India.

So I guess I was just heading back to old lands, …

Mark Collett: To assert your dominance!

Joel Davis: Yeah, there were one ours, and I don’t want them to be ours again. You know it obviously has kind of backfired the whole conquering India thing, so, …

Mark Collett: I can’t believe [chuckling] this argument’s gone full circle like this. God, I never thought you’d say something like that Joel.

Joel Davis: What do you mean?

Mark Collett: You’re the person I could least imagine going anywhere in the world to administer any form of aid!

Joel Davis: Well, it’s pathological altruism! There you go. Like the White man., …

[2:14:15]

Mark Collett: That’s what I mean. After everything you said earlier, you say this now.

Joel Davis: But I think it adds authenticity to my story. To start from a foundation like that and to have to develop as a man and attack your own foundation, criticise it and develop a pure view over many, many years of arduous struggle reading, trying out different ideas and so on to come ultimately to these conclusions as a fully mature, you know, adult male now. So.

Mark Collett: Okay, well, thank you. Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

“Hail Joel! Complete agreement with Joel. Generic nationalism will never work.”

You got a lot of fans in the chat tonight, and I’ve got to say it has been entertaining. We’ve had our own little debate of our own about the sort of ability to work with other ethnic groups.

But I’ve got to say I found your passion and sincerity very important in this. And you know, that certainly can’t be questioned. And you seem to impress a lot of people with what you’ve said. Arab Social Nationalist gave another 1.88. Thank you so much, and said:

“The ‘I don’t care about Palestine’ thing works fine if you’re a Bolivian, but the fact is that the UK and the US are both parties to that conflict. If you can extricate White countries from the conflict, not caring about them is perfectly reasonable. But only then. Whites pay for it in blood and treasure.”

Joel Davis: Well, what I said is I don’t support us being, I don’t support the state of Israel quite clearly.

But you can see this Arab is obviously so emotionally invested in the plight of his own people that he can’t even listen to the words that I said correctly. And I don’t love Palestinians enough for him. And this is exactly the problem with these fucking people! It’s never good enough! I can say:

“I hate Israel! I want them completely cut off!”

Mark Collett: Be careful what you say Joel, because I don’t want [words unclear]

Joel Davis: Fucking bitch about it like, seriously! You’re getting the result that you want. Just be happy with that.

Mark Collett: Okay? Keep Asking for the Truth gave five dollars, … What? Somebody just posted. Right. Okay, look, a few. Oh, the Starfield people meant that jokingly, so that’s okay. I was gonna say I had to ban somebody in the chat earlier for saying something rude about me, but if anyone says anything rude about Joel, I will also ban them. I haven’t banned anyone permanently, but I’ve given a timeout to someone who said that if I spent as much time caring about White girls that were raped as I did about Palestinian children that were blown up would have won by now. That person is a complete idiot, considering I faced seven years in jail for speaking out against Muslim grooming gangs and were put on two of the longest and most expensive political trials in British history. So I spent a huge amount of time raising the issue of grooming gangs.

And in fact, myself and Nick Griffin were the first men in Britain to raise the issues of grooming gangs publicly and politically. And both of us were put on lengthy trials for that. I was actually charged with eight counts of inciting racial hatred for talking about the issue of grooming. So anyone says I don’t care about it is either historically illiterate, or a fed.

I Keep Asking for Truth gave $5 and said:

“Test it.”

Well, thank you. I’m not sure what it was in relation to. And Keep Asking for Truth gave another $3. Thank you so much! He said:

“Joel is too based for most to handle. Based AF, appreciate it.”

He is very based. He’s a good guy and I’m pleased that he’s fought the corner he has fought. Saturn 5, said:

“Hi chaps.”

And gave $3. Thank you very much. Space Kangay, $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

“If we had a hundred non-Whites agree to National Socialism, 90 would still refuse to leave our countries. This is reflective for many hours of discussion on OME and chat apps.”

Well, thank you. I think that’s Joel’s point.

Joel Davis: And as in the chat here, trying to ask questions. But you got to send Mark a Superchat. Like, we’re not answering your question unless you pay up, bitch! You know what I mean?

Mark Collett: To be fair, Joe, usually on a Sunday night, I do the questions for free because I’m captain. I am very charitable. Usually on the Sunday night and the Friday night streams, I do the questions for free. But we have, …

Joel Davis: Well, I’m not doing any free questions! Pay the man! Pay the fucking man!

Mark Collett: You see, [chuckling] you can see there’s a distinct disconnect between Joel and myself. And it might be an Aussie British thing. I’m very easygoing, humourous, and probably come across as sort of slightly nicer and less sweary. And Joel is sort of more hardcore, slightly more sweary and harder to amuse. We have got a slight smirk out of him!

Joel Davis: Why is that an Australian thing? Why? Like you said, …

Mark Collett: I was kind of brought up believing that Australians were all kind of like Max Rockatansky and were just like brooding, hardcore people that lived in the wasteland struggling for that last drop of gasoline.

[2:19:25]

Joel Davis: Well, that was one thing that I did feel when, I mean, I love coming to Britain, and unless they don’t let me in, I’ll definitely be back.

And I do feel very at home in Britain because it’s my ancestral homeland and I’ve always loved visiting and I’ve always felt very comfortable there from the very first moment I walked on the land and spoke to people, because I already have so many people in my life that are British, and obviously that’s my ancestry. And Australia is fundamentally built by the British, so obviously that makes sense.

But one thing that I did feel alienated by when I was in Britain was the fact that it did seem like people were a little bit more sensitive. Like they were taking offence a little bit at things that I was saying. Australians, I guess, we are a little bit more rough in a certain sense. When I got back home, I was like:

“Okay, I can be myself. I don’t have to worry about coming across like I hate you or something.”

And people think that:

“Oh, why would he say that to me? Is he angry?”

It’s like, no. It’s just how we talk, I guess. So.

Mark Collett: Just for the record, and I’m going to embarrass Joel now. He’s a lot more fun when he’s off stream. When he’s off stream, he’s kind of like my naughty little brother. And I was driving around England with him, laughing and joking with him. I’ve got to say, I thought I was the harshest when it came to roasting people and winding them up until I met Joel. And Joel is a master of roasting other people and winding them up.

And I’ve got to say, he’s endless entertainment. I wish I could draw this out of him on stream because I did feel this immediate affinity to him when I met him.

And I’ve got to say I’ve met a few people over the years, sort of like Warren Balogh. It was fantastic meeting him, Blair. But meeting Joel was also one of the highlights. And I got to say, like, one of the things that really disappointed me is that Joel couldn’t come over for like Sunday dinner with the family and everything because he is a really good guy. And I know we have the odd disagreement, but he is one of the people in this movement that I do respect the most.

AWIVR gave $3. Thank you so much! Said:

“Cheers Mark and Joel.”

Son of Mars gave $5. Thank you so much! And he sent a little something that looks like a cheese with an Odysee man on it. So thank you so much for that. Keep Asking for Truth sent $3. Thank you very much. He said:

“I don’t ask, I just say increase the vril. Let’s go! Keep on doing. Great work, Joel.”

Yes, Vril power. I know what that means. Sticks Sent Me Here, gave $5. Thank you so much! He said:

“We don’t need to be friends or receive empathy from Muslims, but if our greatest enemy is their greatest enemy, we could achieve our goal of conquest much faster. Like the British and the Soviets in the 1940s.”

An interesting point somewhere between myself and Joel’s position.

And by the way, I’m not saying we should be best friends with when I probably just have a bit too much empathy, but you can’t hate me for that. Bluey Wap. Well, maybe you can. [chuckling] I don’t know. People hate me for a lot of reasons. Add that one to the growing pile. Bluey Waffen gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

“We can be friendly or sympathetic to like minded non-Whites, but we must stick to our principles and not allow them into our groups lest we risk turning an ethnic nationalist group into a Tommy Robinson style civic nationalist group.”

You see, I just want to answer that one briefly and I’ll say this. When I see sort of like black people who want to remain black and want to separate themselves from us, I’m much more willing to go along with that. I don’t want a Tommy Robinson style thing where Tommy wants a rainbow world just minus Islam. He wants a rainbow world ruled over by sort of powerful Israeli elites just without any Muslims there. And I do see, I don’t know what Joel thinks about this, but I do see this kind of, how can I say this?

So there’s plenty of reasons to not want Muslims in the West, okay? And I don’t want any Muslims in the West. I want to say Muslims shouldn’t be here in places like Britain. I think Joel, we totally agree on that, don’t we? We don’t want Muslims here in White countries.

Joel Davis: Oh, no! Bring as many Muslims in as you want! I love Muslims. What are you talking about?

Mark Collett: Joel’s finally gone crazy! No. So obviously we’re united on the fact we don’t want them here.

But one thing that I think is kind of strange, and one thing about the Tommy Robinson thing that maybe Joel would like to comment on is Tommy’s got this weird thing where he doesn’t want Muslims here, Muslim men, but he does want Muslim women coming here by the boatload. And I kind of find that the Tommy anti-Islam. So Tommy’s reasons for being anti-Islam are in some ways different to ours, but his kind of view of anti-Islam tends to lead to this sort of desire for war. So it’s like the Trump anti-Islam thing is like:

“Look, we need to go to war with Iran.”

Whereas I’m opposed to war with Iran and think as long as Iranians are in Iran, I’m happy for Iran to be the way it is. I don’t know what your take is on that. And that’s really what I was trying to say. Maybe I got confused earlier. Maybe I spoke over you. Some people in the chat said I didn’t. If I did that, I didn’t certainly mean to cause you any offence.

But what I’m trying to say is you have to be very careful about some of this anti-Muslim rhetoric rhetoric, because it’s anti-Muslim rhetoric which is designed to whip young White men into some frenzy, where they’re willing to sign up to go and fight in Iraq or Iran or somewhere like that at the behest of the jews. Do you concede that at all? Do you think there’s any merit to that argument?

[2:25:15]

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously. But the problem is when the criticism of Islam is built around Islam as an ideology or something or as a worldview, as opposed to just recognizing it as a foreign alien element that doesn’t belong in our societies. And that it represents the kind of culture of a foreign race. That’s the issue with it.

And then secondarily, as well, like Europe has been under siege by Islam in various respects for over a thousand years. And so that history needs to be conscious and recognised. And so, yeah, like, you can get this kind of Deus vult*, this framing of Zionist foreign policy, as if it’s like a new crusade or something. And how based is that?

[* Deus vult (Latin for ‘God wills it’) is a Christian motto historically tied to ideas of divine Providence and individual interpretation of God’s will. It was first chanted by Catholics during the First Crusade in 1096 as a rallying cry. Wikipedia]

But, I mean, obviously that’s disingenuous. And it’s just ridiculous as well. Like, why are we going and fighting Muslims in foreign countries when they’re in our own fucking country? [chuckling] Like, it doesn’t even, … So, like, we’ve got to protect Israel from Israel, …

Mark Collett: Yeah, I certainly agree with that point. I think we sort of come the full circle, and I think it’s been an interesting discussion. We’ve run to nearly two and a half hours now, so I think it’s about time we sort of shut this down.

But you know what, Joel? I’ve really enjoyed this night. I think you’ve made a very powerful case, both historically, ideologically, functionally, and, well, in every way. And I’ve got to say, you are a true gentleman to come on and discuss these issues.

And I just want to say, if you’ve got a brief sort of two minutes, how you’d like to sum this up before we shut it down, that’d be appreciated.

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, just to get back to the original subject, I think the key point is this, which is that I don’t think the thing holding back the White race is fundamentally the framing of arguments. I think the thing holding back the White race is cowardice. I think people have motivated, reasoning. People want to reason their way into a worldview or into a set of beliefs that make them feel comfortable, that make them feel secure, that make them feel safe inside.

And so the issue of cowardice and the issue of dishonour is more fundamental than whether this argument or that argument makes sense or not. I believe in the total rational coherence of my worldview, but at the same time, I recognise that it is a worldview that is prohibited fundamentally in the minds of many because of the fear of social ostracism or the fear of the ramifications and implications of the worldview, as opposed to the truth or falsity of the worldview just being rationally evaluated in and of itself.

So that is also the framing of the National Socialist issue. Like, the debate is very seldom about the specific, actual ideas of National Socialism, whether they are good or bad, or whether using those ideas in contemporary context would be good or bad. The debate is mostly about how people “feel” about the idea and how it freaks people out.

And I think acquiescing to:

“Well, this freaks people out. Therefore we shouldn’t consider it!”

It’s just acquiescing to the same psychical structure that is basically putting us in this position in the first place. That whole psychical structure of cowardice, that whole psychical structure of dishonour needs to be challenged directly!

And as I said before, I think World War II was a metaphysical war between the particular and the universal. And I think in order for White particularity to be defended, particularity metaphysically needs to be defended at the core of our worldview.

And so that would be like how I would maybe summate. I think the most important aspect of my position and everything else kind of flows from there.

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! It’s been an entertaining stream. I think we’ve done a bit of everything and we’ve given people half an hour extra than they expected.

I’d like to thank Joel for being such a good support and getting up early in the morning. I’d like to urge Keith, if he’s watching, to please do a debate with Joel over on Elijah Schaffer’s channel. Or if you need somewhere smaller and less famous, do it on mine, of course. [chuckling] That would be appreciated.

I’ve had a great evening and I’d like to thank everyone who’s been in the chat. A few people made rude comments. Those people were temporarily timed out. But I don’t give out permanent bans very often. But please do be respectful both to myself and Joel.

Joel Davis: Come in the chat and call me jewish and accuse me of being a communist and a fed. It’s funny! We should just fill the whole chat with these accusations like why even, like have the sound off and just spam how we’re Fed communist jews and just maniacally just keep typing away and banging the entity.

Mark Collett: That’s what I mean.

Joel Davis: We should just have a live chat where you can just accuse us of all these things constantly and that would be hilarious!

Mark Collett: There’s a guy called Jimbo who loves, who absolutely loves one of your Telegram moderators. He’s been talking about him all night. So apparently, you know, anyway, before Joel kicks this particular hornet’s nest so hard that we can’t sleep for the next week because of the stings, we’re gonna call it a day.

But it has been really good! Thanks for getting up so early, Joel. Thanks to everyone in the chat. I know it’s been a heated debate, but from my point, I’ve got to say Joel is a stand up guy. I’ve really enjoyed it. Me and Joel agree on what 95% things. We had a little bit debate about something from a certain perspective. I do respect Joel’s point of view, and I think everyone should support him as much as they can. I think he’s a very, very brave guy, especially to take the point that he’s taken at such a young age. You know, he’s putting his whole future in this cause. And obviously, I wish him all the best and I hope to continue working with him long into that future.

So thank you so much, Joel. You’re a stand up character!

Anyway, we’re going to shut things down now. Thank you so much to everyone who’s here. Thanks to Joel. Thank you much for everyone who donated so generously.

I’ll be back on Wednesday for another episode of Patriotic Weekly Review. But for now, thank you and good night, everyone, and have a lovely weekend, whatever’s left of it. Good night.

[2:31:49]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/27/2025 = 1629)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

7
6
Hide replies

@katana17
2 days ago
[Mark Collett – Can National Socialism Be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis – Mar 23, 2025 – Transcript]

Mark Collett – Can National Socialism Be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis – Mar 23, 2025 – Transcript

[In this livestream video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, talks with Joel Davis on the need to rehabilitate National Socialism as an alternative to (((liberal))) democracy that is destroying the West. Items discussed include:
Mark introduces Joel Davis as a leading young intellectual in the world-wide nationalist movement (2:00)
Joel explains he wrote an essay defending the rehabilitation of National Socialism in response to Keith Woods’ criticism (7:00)
Joel argues nationalism needs an ideology to serve it, and National Socialism is built entirely out of the nationalist idea (10:00)
Joel discusses Carl Schmitt’s prediction that liberalism and nationalism would become enemies (13:00)
Joel argues Germany had a unique historical role in resisting liberalism in Europe (18:00)
Mark asks Joel to focus on why National Socialism is relevant today rather than historical context (22:00)
Joel says Australia needs National Socialist principles to survive as a White nation (25:00)
“We need a movement that inspires people to have courage.”-Joel (30:00)
Discussion of the term “Nazi” losing power as an insult (35:00)
Joel criticises conservatives for allowing the Left to dictate their standards (40:00)
Mark questions Joel’s opposition to working with other ethnic nationalist groups (45:00)
“I want to have a space where White people organise our own politics amongst ourselves.”-Joel (50:00)
Debate over showing empathy for Palestinian victims vs focusing solely on White interests (60:00)
Joel argues Whites need to focus on organising themselves rather than foreign conflicts (70:00)
“We need fighters. I mean, obviously by fighters you mean political fighters.”-Mark (75:00)
And more, …
Less

8
2
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Mark,
This discussion would have been better if it wasn’t focused on Joel’s views.
A better approach would have been to go through the history and precepts of NatSoc -and Drexler/Feder’s 25 points- to see if they can still be applied today.
That’s what I tuned in for.
Tip: even Goebbels called out the 25 points as being too Teutonic and out of date. Look instead at the manifesto of the DAP.
Both Striker and Warren will speak with perspicacity on this, rather than frustration, anger, heedlessness.

7
4
DerCherusker
3 days ago
$10.00
Great debate and powerful takes. I agree with Joel, the watered down version won’t work.

35
2
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
The “I don’t care about Palestine” thing works fine if you are Bolivian. But the fact is that the US and UK are both parties to that conflict. If you can extricate White countries from the conflict, not caring about it is perfectly reasonable, but only then. Whites pay for it in blood and treasure.

41
11
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago
true. also there is a strategic reason to care, it has done more damage to israels image than anything else in the past 80 years. for that reason alone everyone should be keeping Gaza in the spotlight as long as possible

15
3
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
And done nothing to help white people. Even emboldens them because Israel is viewed as a white supremacist state by most Arabs and those who support Palestine.

4
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago
ah yes silly me, all those videos of israel bombing children were actually GOOD for israel! thats why they never took tiktok down! of course.
we should all just forget any of it ever happened and only talk about relevant things like the shoa, right rabbi?

2
1
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
1 day ago
Its good because majority of normal people view Israel as a white supremacist coloniser state and blame white people and christians for the genocide againts Palestinians.

0
1
Hide replies

@xero
1 day ago
I think “most” is a huge overstatement. Also protestant christians in the US are at least partially directly to blame, without them israel would not be in a position to do any of this.

1
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
This is a non-sequitur. He did not say “good for israel.” He said “done nothing to help white people.” He is correct that arabs are anti-white leftists in the US and Europe mostly. Only when their own hides are on the line do Arabs appeal to Hitler.

HH
2 days ago
We can condemn Israel without siding or appealing to the Arabs or other minorities.

6
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago(edited)
condemning them for genociding [x group] implicitly puts you “on the side” of [x group]. not sure what you are even trying to say there.

1
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
If that nonsense is correct then Davis doesn’t have to be friendly towards any POC and doesn’t have to say “poor muslims” he just has to condemn the genocide to please the likes of you. But that still isn’t enough even going by your own logic, you obviously require more from him. You want him to officially state his position as POC alliance friendly.
I condemn the act of genocide but personally I don’t give a damn about any Arab/Jew or non White. If every last one of them were to be swept aside by natural disaster I wouldn’t spend more than a second thinking about them. I would how ever spend more time thinking about the poor animals that may have been effected.

1
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago(edited)
doesn’t have to say “poor muslims” he just has to condemn the genocide to please the likes of you.
correct. the rest of your comment is stupid.
“I can only be a White nationalist if I don’t have empathy for non-whites”
this sounds stupid and childish because it is. You sound like a toddler. If you truly didn’t care about any arabs or non-whites then why is their genocide bad or different than a natural disaster from your perspective?

1
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
I am not about to waste my time trying to explain beyond black and white to a genius who has not grasped simple English grammar. I’ll leave you to dwell on the matter and I’ll give you an eternity to do so simpleton.

0
1
Hide replies

@xero
1 day ago
you’re just an edgelord with no actual worldview. I bet your dumbass is covered in tattoos

1
0
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago(edited)
You have the English grammar of a nine year old and talk like a 15 year old. Probably something to do with the fact you’re a shit skin from the the Gay American Empire. Not my fault you’re a small brained, simple organism. That would be mother nature’s evolutionary selection.

0
1
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
They have millions of students even some jews on literally every university in the West protesting for Palestine, ofcourse calling Israel a white supremacist coloniser nation. At the same time no Palestinian movement or pro-Palestine movement ever protested againts the injustices done to the white race.

11
6
Hide replies

@lewpers
2 days ago
Irrelevant – jews brought them here.

5
4
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Yet its the muslims who do all the raping, mudering and terrorising. Lets cry some more over an alien people who terrorise us on a daily basis.

2
2
Hide replies

@lewpers
2 days ago
Yes, let’s attack the bees and not the hive first.

1
1
Carnegie
2 days ago
You’re trying to imply that jewish lead Palestine protests, that mainly consist of BLM, Antifa supporters, and westernized Muslims, are somehow representative of actual ethnic Palestinians, in Palestine, that are fighting our greatest enemy so that they can stay in their land.

4
1
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
I am saying that Palestinian Arabs have more support than white people, and for the only explicilty pro-white movements use their energy to support Arabs is completely useless. As for them fighting our so called greatest enemy, do you really think if Israel ceases to exist as a state that all the millions of muslims who terrosise white people on a daily basis in western countries will all just pack up and leave. You live in an echo chamber and weaking a small state in the Middle East wont stop antiwhite ideology.

1
1

@selly
2 days ago
im pretty sure hamas did a whole publicity stunt during the george floyd riots supporting blm

1
1

@lewpers
2 days ago(edited)
General rule of thumb: anyone arguing that they don’t care about Palestinians is either taking $$$ from someone or a brain dead boomer. Everyone else understands the connection between what’s happening there and those who rule us.

9
11
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Where are the Palestinians straining their ovaries about White genocide and the connection to us being targeted for murder by ethnics because of the jew subversion?

1
0
Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
You said the same thing earlier, BAP.

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
All the “WE should align with shit skins” moral fags can never argue against this point. Every single time.

0
1
Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
You’re Jewish

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Haha accusing anyone who isn’t a shit skin loving moral fag of “taking $$$ from someone”, basically accusing the only real NATSOCs in existence of being on the take and then calling anyone who defends NATSOC of being a jew. And no actual point to make against cucking to shit skins. You’ve been Noticed.

Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
anyone with your opinion IS Jewish, though?

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago(edited)
Anyone with your level of English grammar isn’t worth listening to let alone your utter failure to get past the very first obstacle to your “love the shit skins” moral fagging. We know what you’re here to do, you’d be more effective on faceberg.

@Uncle_Anon
2 days ago
Agreed, it’s the same for “I don’t care about Ukraine I’m America first!”, bitch you made this ‘conflict’, hell you even blew up a pipeline.

3
1
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Why are so many people talking like American negros? That entire sentence has got a Shaniqua overtone.

Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Mate, too many Nats have zero ideological consistency.
They are happy with appearing monsters without humanity.
#GrugNats
Email me with a ‘hello’

11
2
HH
2 days ago
Until we start hearing loud and powerful condemnations from Palestinians and other muslims/minorities when their kind commit patterns of crimes against the Indigenous host populations where they seek “refuge” we should all be with Davis on this. It’s always Whites who are held to the jewish subversion of “silence is violence”, but muslims, they don’t have to make a sound when we’re targeted for murder/rape/violence by them. National Socialists were not responsible for the creation of Israel that was liberal democracy, so let proponents of democracy appeal to the minorities, let liberals apologise for the creation of Israel and all the problems they’re causing to the muslims. If NATSOC won Israel and it’s little tribe would have far less power if any.

10
4
Hide replies

@selly
2 days ago
Exactly. Muslims are quite happy to work hand in glove with the jews when it suits them moors invasions in Europe, Ottomans invasions of Europe all prime examples. Are muslims guilty about murdering, raping and pillaging lands? No they celebrate it and outright speak of their desire to do it again to Europe.

4
0

@Chromophobic
2 days ago
People forget or aren’t aware that National Socialists were explicitly pro Arab and anti zionist. Jews are the enemy. This is the worst thing that has happened to them since 1933. To not capitalize on it is idiotic. Holding jews to the standards that they set for us is basic logic.

4
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
I guess we sort of pay for the Turkish occupation of Cyprus also–at least our government allowed it to occur, but not many Arabs/moslems (if any) speak up about that. I think the jews are showing their inhumanity nicely in Palestine. I pity anyone at their mercy, but I wish the Arabs/moslems would have the same sense of justice when it comes to the rights of whites. The number of caustic moslems — Levant Arabs specifically — settling Germany likely exceeds the number of caustic jews in Roman Palestine.

2
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$3.00
Joel is to based for most to handle. Based af Appreciate it.

28
2
Hide replies
Caledonian Alemanni
3 days ago
*too based

10
1

@xero
2 days ago
he is truly a supreme gentleman

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The Palestinians have never asked anyone outside their region to fight for them. Not ever. They ask for nothing other than to stop supplying ISrael with the means to kill them.

23
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
So they should love Davis style NATSOC because he wants to cut Israel and jews out of White countries. Why do we have to apologise to them as well?

4
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
It is not white nationalists giving these lampshades weapons. It would be nice if Arabs focused their information inwards and on their extremists to attack jew lobbyists rather than white women.

4
0
Son of Mars
3 days ago
Overcoming the Holocaust myth is important. It creates a total frame shift once you realize how much we were lied to.

21
0
ILoveJesusChrist
3 days ago(edited)
What a breath of fresh air! Joel thinks like a winner. His thinking is the type of thinking required if White people even have a chance. Mark’s take sounds kind, but it will not end White Genocide. Focusing on the plight of other racial groups instead of ourselves is a losing strategy. NonWhites do not care about White people. If you talk to any of them long enough you will find they are all antiWhite. Some are just less antiWhite than others.

20
2
AurigaBooks
2 days ago
National Socialism is fundamentally aligned w/ nature, and unlike communism, it works in practice \o

17
1
Hide replies
0KT0BER
2 days ago
I very much doubt that any White folk are pushing the ‘christ is king/nazi’s were christians’ horseshit.
Just posting this to bolster your claim.
https://odysee.com/@0KT0BER:9/folkandfaith:0

3
0
HH
3 days ago(edited)
kosher Greg Johnson: “We shouldn’t align with NSDAP because normal people associate them with all the lies and untruth propaganda they’ve been told about them”.

16
2
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Greg is like 75 now I believe. KMac is much better from that generation.

0
2
Hide replies

@Diogenes
2 days ago
Greg is like 53 so you’re way off there. I believe Kevin MacDonald is 80. personally I admire them both.

2
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
Being an avid reader of CC it is my opinion Greg Johnson has now been compromised. Article after article about the blax but nothing on the constant attacks on Whites by jews, yeah but the blax are the real problem. Leading up to the election he suddenly became a massive Trump shill in a MAGAtard sense. An article posted today where the writer talks about looking at “elder personalities” and mentions two jewish writers that have done nothing for Whites but they’ve written constantly about delusional blax on why they just can’t seem to do civilisation. Moderators on CC have been instructed that no one can be seen disagreeing with the supreme leader in any impactful way in the comments.

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
I think we are both wrong. I’ll keep an eye out for it. I stopped following Greg some time ago.

2
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
I stopped very recently. By follow I mean frequent his website, which was up until he flipped invaluable to our cause.

@ArcadeOutpost
2 days ago(edited)
56:15
and Christianity has been a massive factor behind universalist thought, it was the first thing to start eroding at racial identity in favor of universalist ideals

17
2

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need whites to stop caring about other races

18
3
The National
2 days ago
Show me Muslims that care about the raped British girls. They don’t…
But Whites need to care about every shitskin. This is why Whites lose

16
4
Hide replies
Carnegie
2 days ago
Show me Muslims that care about the raped British girls. They don’t…
Neither does the British government.
But Whites need to care about every shitskin. This is why Whites lose
Whites lose because the jews take a legitimate grievance and use it to manipulate low IQ people. Currently they’re using it to prevent you from dealing a serious blow to their global credibility. It’s a free shot at the jews so why not take it. You don’t have to support it, just don’t countersignal the people that do.
And we’re not talking about all non-whites. We’re talking about the Palestinians who are fighting against the jews to stay in their own nation.

4
4

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
How was Hitler anti-Slavic? what utter rubbish that is.

11
0
Hide replies
Smoothie
2 days ago
he wasn’t technically anti Slavic, in his book he wrote about how it bothered him that there were so many Slavs who left the Soviet Union and began taking low class jobs in Austria, hence why Adolf ended up homeless at one point, so he was irritated by that but propaganda likes to use that to say he didn’t think Slavs were white or whatever else they come up with, he actually felt sorry for them and wanted to destroy communism so they could go about their lives in their own homelands

7
0
Hide replies
Asadafa
5 hours ago
I think it was mainly ethnics from within AT-HU. Hitler writes about this in regards to the Vienna parliament. German AT had the particular situation that much of its industry was given to the Czechs, as were a good portion of its national archives, which were held at the oldest German university, Karlsuniversitaet in Prague. The reason for this, which Hitler details in his speech April 29, 1939, is that Prague (under LU) was once deutsche Kaiserstadt. The Kaiser moved to Vienna roughly permanently in 1438.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KarlIV.(HRR
) The Czech issue was added to the Hanseatic issue of Danzig and the Corridor and Russian-hosted bolshevism.

Pure
2 days ago(edited)
He was nordicist supremacist, so basically at least indifferent of everyone else. If germany had won, had it passed laws on the now huge area(basically europe as a whole and likely much of russia) of 3rd reich that non northwest european peoples are officially 2nd class citizens and/or slaves in the 3rd reich(europe) is another question. I think such laws would have been passed.

0
6
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago(edited)
If that had been the case such laws would have been a long way off as it was estimated that the make-up of the German people was around 65% Nordic/Aryan with the remaining 35% being the other white races of Europe…..It was a universal agreement that there was no such thing as a 100% Aryan in NS Germany, they respected all races, but in their own regions.

2
0
Hide replies
Pure
1 day ago
I dont know the exact genetics of 30s germans/people living in germany. Other than they were most likely germanics by en large. But i do know that in fact Hitler was nordicist supremacist. Nobody knows what would have happened in each european nation in case of german total victory. I mean besides you people of course.
So i think that due to the fact of Hitlers nordicist supremacism, its very likely that in case of a total victory by 3rd reich most of europe would have been made as part/vassals of the 3rd reich empire, including most of russia.
And non northwest europeans would have been seen as inferiour to the master race in the 3rd reich empire. Because they simply were. And as such treated differently both socially and under the laws.
3rd reich was not about a peace and love inclusion fest that many seem to think. It was an militaristic empire in the making. One that would rival russian empire and american empire and british empire. And thats why the other empires had to become allies and crush that emerging empire. And to make sure germany/germans never pose such threat to them ever. And they did make sure of that. And lets not forget not only about germans, but of other axis nations. The allied empires punished any nation who fought on axis side and made sure such uprising/revolt doesnt happen again in europe.
Ns Germany did make brutal war against other europeans. But somehow many that call themselves nationalists think ns Germany was just this big peace and love country. Like misunderstood hippies or something. In war you kill them, conquer them, take/use their natural resources, including their fertile women. And you subjugate them to under your power, culture, norms and laws.
Less

0
2
Hide replies

@RonP1
1 day ago(edited)
In the 1930s the Germans, especially in the northwestern parts were near identical to Brits, but Germany’s territory went right across to East Prussia, so it’s pretty obvious that Germany was a mixture…..as I said, it was a universal agreement that there was no such thing as a 100% Aryan in Germany, but it was the predominant strain in the make-up of the people, and they decided that they wanted to protect and improve that strain.

3
0
Hide replies
Pure
19 hours ago
I dont really care what germans at that time were. Im interested about the actions, not of the exact genetics. And more precisely of likely or possible future actions taken by the 3rd reich empire in europe if it had won over the british, russian and american empires. But this is clearly very touchy subject for most people or at least most ns people. Again it seems like many truly believe it would have been an eternal love and peace fest.

0
2
Asadafa
1 day ago
This is mostly untrue and unrealistic. Russia was a backwards mess in 1900. Poland was not quite as bad but still weak and disorganized and claiming territory from Germans, Czechs, Belarussians, Ukrainians, and Lithuanians. “Czechoslovakia” under Benes–a completely invented nation in which the Czech supremacists were only 55% majority — did everything everything in the 1920s to 1930s to infuriate everyone besides Czechs, including the Slovaks and Poles. NS Germany did not “take” women from other societies, and it allied with Hungary, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia, and (formally) BiH.

2
0
Hide replies
Pure
19 hours ago(edited)
Being allies in war time doesnt have to do with friendship. Those are strategic decisions. I mean germany made war against its former allies. But you already knew that. Many have turned against their allies, so it doesnt really mean much. What matters at least to me is what is actually done. Interesting aspects of war is also how birthrates in occupied france rose up sharply. I dont claim germans took french women and made them pregnant whilst having first killed/imprisoned lots of french men. Nor do i claim that in wars in general that sort of phenomenom happens, that winner would take it all, including many of the fertile women.

0
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
11 hours ago
Which allies?

1
0
Hide replies
Pure
10 hours ago
Go study

0
1
MTaylor
2 days ago
If you can trust this info, take a look:
Generalplan Ost
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost

1
1
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago
It’s Wikipedia nonsense – if they did move German people east it would have been into unpopulated regions, similar to the Volga Germans

5
0

@RonP1
2 days ago(edited)
There’s a fair bit of information on the link below – it states “There is no indication that this plan was ever given official approval in full by either Himmler or Hitler.”
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=90383
Wikipedia’s page is complete crap designed to bolster the official story ie if you believe the official story you’re likely to believe that too.

4
0
VapourLynx
15 hours ago(edited)
Wikipedia is the worst for NS info because it always has the post-WW2 anti-NS victors’ spin on it. Go search Karl Radl on x/twitter, who is basically as knowledgeable about National Socialism as you can get, he has a recent post about it.
And I’d just say, even if there were some actions the Germans took that were disagreeable, that doesn’t mean that the general ideology or ‘world concept’ was bad. It doesn’t mean you have to drive East or make an anti-Slav statement. There were plenty of geopolitical tensions between Slavs & Germans even pre-NS, which includes WW1 & the German territory cut up after WW1. There was even mistreatment & expulsions of German minorities in the Soviet Union prior to Hitler coming to power.

3
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Those allergic to a Swastika are Not welcome in my foxhole.

11
0

@Deanfranjek
2 days ago
NS is the only solution to this current mess .

11
1
Hide replies

@Rickyboy
2 days ago
ive said that time and time again

2
1
The Pork Report
3 days ago
The holohoax is crumbling.

10
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
The holocaust myth is shaking

10
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Keith Woods definitely gives off subversive rat vibes to me, 100% support Joel and what he stands for.

9
2
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Some humanity wouldn’t kill you. Hitler pitied the Palestinians publicly and in writing.

12
5
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Some Nats like appearing as monsters.
Mark was right this evening.
We are consistent with Nationalism or we are fkn frauds.

8
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
1 day ago
It is correct to have behavioral norms and reciprocity expectations from those who expect our support. Killing children with bombs is unacceptable as is sending your men to our country to stab our children and rape our women, then refusing to repatriate these elements, as most Arabs do to us.

Stefan
17 hours ago
I wounder what his opinion would be today if he could see modern Europe…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
If the answer to an existential crisis is not revolutionary, then it isn’t an answer. You cannot accept that Whites are on the brink of extinction and at the same time insist that the response should be as polite and acceptable as possible. It makes no sense. Conservatism is poison.

9
0
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago
The problem is, nothing in this world is forever. It can be that whites dont exist forever, or non whites for that matter. Or some in between. Its not just a given.
At the end of the day its about does the organism have the will to survive. Can it survive and adapt to the environment. We have adapted and survived the extreme cold. Can we now adapt to surviving the hostility of invading non whites against us. We have done and survived that too before. So the odds of us surviving this time is pretty high. The question really is what is the best method to adapt and survive this. More research and streams should be done about how we survived before.

1
0

@Uncle_Anon
2 days ago
“Resurrected”
It never “died” it is a System of governance that was tried once and it was a miraculous success and seemingly the natural form of governance for Whites. You better hope you can…

8
0
renunciate
2 days ago
I agree with Joel in that we have to focus on our people where we are.

7
1

@Grumpole
2 days ago
White people have been poisoned by the jew into believing that they are the problem, when facts and history says the jew have always been the problem. Until Satan and his Synagogue of evil is neutralised nothing will change for the good.

8
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Sieg Heil!

8
1
The Goyim Report
3 days ago
the answer to 1984 is 1933

9
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
all other races only care about their own. so must we

11
3
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago(edited)
Obviously those europeans that come out of this extinction/bottle neck event, or rather that survive to build anew, will be much less pleasant and much less humanitarian europeans. Likely even quite selfish and violent dickheads. But thats nature taking its course. And it will take its course and shape the new survivor european man. He will be strong, violent and merciless, unlike the modern european man.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
Perhaps what’s happening here is that figures on the right are struggling with the terrible truth that is crystalising in front of them: there is no parliamentary or democratic way out of the crisis of modernity. NS is necessary precisely because it is revolutionary.

8
0

@Spartanwarrior
2 days ago
i agree with Joel. Mark is living in the past

8
1
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
You think the guy trying to revive the 1930s is the one who’s not living in the past? Staggering take.

0
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
1 day ago
Grab onto something! Trying to destroy lies about the past in the present, given the significance of the past event and doctrinaire handling of the historical lies at present, is critical at present. Controlling the teaching of the past right now is current and it is critical to our future.

@atexian
2 days ago
Good debate! I do agree with Joel, we have finite resources, both mental and physical, we need to be strategic and focus on the singular goal of White unification first. Once we have unity and political power, maybe we can stretch out into other things.

6
1

@jfreedom1350
2 days ago
What is truly remarkable is the fact that people from all parts of EARTH are now intuitively thinking the same thing and seeing the same issues. The subversive powers that be currently are aware of this and their campaign to dissuade people across the planet is abundantly clear. The very act of ‘them’ doing this is what is waking people up across the globe.

7
0
King Tut
2 days ago
when it comes to politics, Joel is 100% on point!

7
2

@Smidolf
3 days ago
A Bosnian is still a European.

7
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I don’t consider Albanians european even tho they are white and on the continent.

0
5
White Minority
3 days ago
revising the holohoax is the only way to go

7
0

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Jews control, fund and direct the mainstream right throughout the West. This is especially true of Great Britain. See Sargon, Robinson, Fox, Farage, Hopkins, Reform, Hopkins, Musk, possibly Homeland and many others

7
0

@YeGadz
2 days ago
Joel is 1000% correct, white identarianism is the only way out of this shit, no amount of collaboration with other groups is fixing it. And he is right we are weak, and cuck to our liberal priors for optics.

5
1
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
I think what Mark doesn’t understand is that the original national socialist were able to be polite and have good relationships with other nations and races because they weren’t dealing with them in their home countries

6
0
Hide replies

@Mushriks
2 days ago
Other nations and cultures yeah… does that include Eastern European nations too?

Hide replies
Long Knife
2 days ago
yes
“Just as England looks after its interests in every corner of the earth, modern Germany, too, shall know how to look after and protect its – albeit much more limited – interests. And these interests of the German Reich include protecting those German Volksgenossen who are not, of their own power, in a position to secure for themselves on our borders the right to general human, political, and weltatnschaulich freedom! In the fifth year following the first great foreign policy agreement of the Reich, it fills us with true satisfaction to be able to say that, particularly as regards our relations with the state with which we would perhaps have the greatest differences, not only have tensions lessened; moreover, in the course of these past years, an ever friendlier rapprochement has come about. I well know that this was due first and foremost to the fact that, at the time, Warsaw did not have a Western parliamentarianism but a Polish Marshal who, being an outstanding figure, sensed how very significant a lessening of German-Polish tensions was for Europe. The work of that time, which many questioned, has proven itself in the interim; and I may well say that, when the League of Nations finally abandoned its unremitting attempts to cause disruption in Danzig and furthermore appointed a new commissioner who was a man of personal stature, this very spot that presented the greatest threat to European peace lost its dangerous significance.
The Polish nation respects the national conditions in this state, and this city and Germany both respect Polish rights. Hence it was possible to pave the way for an understanding which, starting with Danzig, has been capable of completely removing the poison from the relationship between Germany and Poland, transforming it into one of truly friendly cooperation – despite the attempts of troublemakers here and there.”
~ Adolf Hitler
from Reichstag speech of February 20th, 1938
Less

1
0
Pure
2 days ago
Lets not pretend that ns germany was some humanitarian superpower. Its was highly organized militaristic superpower wanting to expand.

1
2
Hide replies

@Jiveturkey0001
7 hours ago
So?

1
0

@Jiveturkey0001
7 hours ago
Yes. And also because they actually achieved a level of strength and power that allowed them to COMMAND respect from those other races.

Drake
3 days ago
I agree with Joel. White people need to look inwards and focus on our own above all else in order to throw off the Jewish shackles which will in the end eliminate their power and ability to do what they do re expanding Israels borders unopposed in the first place.

5
1
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
middle east conflicts belong to the middle east….let them sort out their own shit. No more money or military from White nations

6
0
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
$5.00
People are open to Europa being fact checked but Keith was saying bad faith stuff like, Hitler was anti-Slavic, and Jews don’t have a monopoly on central banks or global finance. He was parroting Wikipedia. I suggest a 2 on 2 bare knuckle boxing fight – Mark and Joel VS Keith Woods and Alek Yerbury

6
0

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
Yeah, “Nazi” = “Gas chambers” for the Eternal Normie.

5
1

@TRNSAU
2 days ago
Mr Davis is 100% Correct.

5
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Rockwell worked with them because they were there in front of him. There’s no reason to pretend they don’t exist.

5
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
You have to deal with the situation as it is. Since non-Whites are often racially aware, you can have the peaceful separation discussion with them.

6
1
Kevin
3 days ago
Tucker is another Thiel nationalist

5
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
What’s even the point of WN when all it’s young members are spiritually negrified

6
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Conservatism is anti-national and anti-White. It’s the most despicable ideology in Western politics.

4
0
HH
2 days ago
If NATSOC won Israel and the jews wouldn’t have one third of the power they wield over the West today. NATSOC does not need to appeal to or beg mulsims about anything.

4
0

@MalteHenryk
2 days ago
To have sympathy for other peoples isn’t making their cause your own.
Being a nationalist doesn’t mean you can’t cooperate with other groups for a common (!) cause.
I don’t believe that’s very pragmatic or a winners strategy but that won’t stop online goofballs who are more interested in letting of steam rather than actually changing something in RL.

5
1

@RonP1
2 days ago
Colin Jordan’s ‘The National Vanguard – The Way Forward’ is a must read for NS’s
https://odysee.com/@RonP1:8/the-national-vanguard-the-way-forward-colin-jordan:e

4
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
“Homosexual and gay” are code words for: Perverted Queers.

3
1
AWIVR
3 days ago
$3.00
cheers mark and joel

4
0

@VikingBro
3 days ago
Joel Davis \o I recognize myself in him. There was years when I never laughed or smiled, because of how serious I feel about the struggle. \o

4
0

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Can I question when chimneys were built?

4
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
third reich was a success, we are still here today because it

4
0
Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago
$5.00
Hail Joel! Complete agreement with Joel. Generic “nationalism” will never work.

5
1

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Mark and Duke are very experienced and should be listened to here

3
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Cucker Tarlson is an overpaid Coward.

4
0
Son of Mars
3 days ago
We get called Nazis for wanting white countries anyway. Go through em.

4
0

@RonP1
3 days ago
Globalism is just the new term for Internationalism

4
0

@Loke
1 day ago
At about 1h45m: The question of taking sides in the Israeli genocide. Joels third position is a bit like; I don´t care when evil triumphs.
Peaceful separation would need a Palestine for Palestinians to return to, and a Syria for Syrians, not a growing zionists tumor fully supported by treasonous western clown puppets, seen by Arabs and muslims as representing white Europeans.
Being supportive of a Palestinian homeland does not contradict our claims to our lands, it is actually the moral stance to take.

3
0

@MaDaZi
2 days ago
Never thought i would write these words but… Mark seems to have a loser mentality, like a centrist. That won’t save the white race. Have to rethink my entire view of Mark now.

6
5
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
You should look up a guy called George Lincoln Rockwell, by your standard he was a centrist with a loser mentality.

4
0
JohnDuly
2 days ago
Joel Davis is really becoming a huge figure in all of our lives. This from a boomer in New Jersey. God bless the both of u and a growing number of other proud committed strong white men!

2
0
renunciate
2 days ago
The St George’s flag seems to be familiar and stir the soul of the British. Why reinvent the wheel? Use what you’ve got.

1
0
Hide replies
Cù Fhoirthe
1 day ago
There are about 7-8 million native “British” people for whom the St George’s is not an ethnic symbol, and is even a foreign one.

renunciate
1 day ago
, I probably should’ve written “English” rather than British. I’m sure you also have a regional flag that would serve as a nationalistic symbol. My apologies, as I clearly mis-spoke. My excuse is “murica”

@GazChamberz
2 days ago
A ‘neonazi’ demo in Berlin on Saturday was led by a Turk! We should support Palestinians because the Zionists use anti Muslim propaganda to reinforce their own power. The ADL says half of humanity is antisemitic, who is to say they won’t use Trump to witch hunt anyone who they deem antisemitic??

3
0
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
I think it’s really unfair for Mark to keep bringing up the dude with tattoos on his face that was a big debacle I get it but it was a one-off that dude is not representative in fact he was probably a plant

4
1
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
That’s just disillusionment on your part. Present the wrong image and you lose people, like it or not. Oh, and why does every misguided person on the Right have to be a plant? You’re kidding yourself if you really believe that.

Lamps
2 days ago
Mark, you’re a legend

3
2
Smoothie
2 days ago
nationalism is the natural default mode of all nations, but our people’s natural instincts has been subverted, it’s like they are in a cult, if you look at the achievements the liberal commie bastards have had it’s because they are unapologetically radical, the more radical they are the closer they get to their goals, nationalist need to be as unapologetically radical as the liberals, moderateness gets you no where

3
0

@popovacianen
3 days ago
im a nazi and seeing palestian kids blown up pisses me off and im not lying so what ever

3
0
Hide replies

@selly
1 day ago
yes you’re white. Palestinians on the other hand dont give a flying f*ck when white kids are ran down by a semi trailer in France

3
1
Hide replies

@popovacianen
1 day ago
well my morality does not change just cuz somebody else is retarded

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
wow mark is not correct on this at all

3
2
The Pork Report
3 days ago
Whites are too nice already. Non-Whites haven’t earned any right to interact with us.

2
1

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
lucas gage saw pretty brutally on twitter that theres no reciprocity or one struggle. all the muslims told him to get fcked when he tried to get them to sympathise with any form of white nationalism. they dog piled him

3
0
Hide replies
Stefan
1 day ago
I hope people saved screenshots and archived links of when they dog pilled lucas gage.

1
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
We aren’t asking for their help, we’re telling them what we are doing to make it so they don’t come into conflict with us as we move towards our goals.

3
0
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
kanye good example..White Lives Matter tshirt revenue went to Blacks in need

3
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
the key is not in “not scaring” the women, its in giving them confidence in your strength and resolve

4
1
Hide replies
Teutonic Truth
1 day ago
DUKE is Six Millions times The Man you, trump, and farage will ever be.

1
1
Hide replies

@LottaSense
1 day ago
Wow, you sure are an old, idiot boomer.

0
1
Counter-Currents
3 days ago
Many liberals don’t fundamentally disagree with the far Left. Conservatives really don’t agree with National Socialism.

4
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
NeoBolsheviks prefer to say Global because they intend to delete the word and existence of Nation.

3
0

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
efficiency and hard work was German way. Soft pleasure seekers were not the German way back then. Now days not so much

3
0

@Germanicus
21 hours ago(edited)
You know who did care about the Palestinian cause because it aligned with their own? You know who did have diplomacy with Iran? You know who did ally with Japan and called them “honorary Aryans”? You know who did build a multi-ethnic ideological army to fight the greater enemy? The German National-Socialists.
The fact these walking talking Hollywood cartoons like to highlight their most morbid takes on the televised jew-orchestrated genocide in Gaza and think that’s somehow gonna win people over, is mind-boggling. Unless of course, they’re bad actors and know what they’re doing.

3
1
Hide replies
Stefan
17 hours ago
I wounder what the opinions of the old german NSs would be today if could see modern Europe…

@NoFunZone
1 day ago
its crazy to me that your average black has much higher in-group preference than the top 2% of whites(the actual nationalists). whites really do seem to fetishize the outsider.

1
1
Mr
2 days ago
I hope your son is allowing you to get good nights’ rests, Mark!

2
0
DaisyS
2 days ago
Mark Collett point to a time in history when Muslims cared about a white country or any white people. Your virtue signalling is pathetic

4
4
Hide replies

@selly
1 day ago
EXACTLY !! As i said muslims are quite happy to work with jews when it suits them. Moors and ottomans as examples. Do they have any remorse or care for the suffering of the people of Europe? No. Infact they celebrate it and wish to do it again in Europe.

4
0
Htrac
2 days ago
Agree with what Joel says from
1:37:12
. I am getting really sick of the “based Muslim alliance” and how many people in the nationalist and “far right” circles will criticise and insult you if you object to Muslims in your country or say they should be deported – and even more bizarrely, they call you Jewish (Fuentes, groypers, Lucas Gage, David Clews etc).
It’s a ridiculous position to be bargaining from, that we need the support of the invaders to get our countries back and we should overlook the horrible crimes they’ve done to us because we “need” them to be on our side. Disgusting.

2
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Mark’s audio is a bit off here.

2
0
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
Yes, very unusually so. Mark’s usually spot on with the technical stuff, and it’s the guests that have problems, but that’s flipped on this stream.

– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
2 days ago
The Israel-Palestine thing is so tiresome. If Jews and Arabs want to kill each other in the sand let them have at it, they’ve been doing it to each other for centuries, and in ten thousand years they’ll still be killing each other in the dirt whether they’re using American jets or sticks and stones, the very bible some of you pro-Palestinian types thump so vehemently is a catalogue of the middle east’s centuries of ceaseless barbarity.
If you think Palestinian immigrants from the conflict are bad, what will you think of Israeli immigrants when they start fleeing the sinking ship? The sad truth is that regardless of who wins, Europe loses.

3
1
Sulla
2 days ago
This is an excellent conversation

2
0
Will O’ The Wild
2 days ago
1488th comment

2
0

@RiseAgain
2 days ago
It’s easy to over-intellectualize everything when you’re as smart as Joel is, so appreciate his unwillingness to indulge in that. Embrace the basics. “Grug-brain” nationalism.

2
0

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
I have moved on. Into community building. Stalking normies as a bad guy is not my bag. Money and time can be better spent on people who seek me. There is the internet and search tatics for people who care about nationism.

2
0
MasterOfStf
3 days ago
Great stream

2
0

@Esau
3 days ago
we will be victorious, folks! We’ll come out of this stronger and wiser than ever before!

2
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Teach your kids about the birds and the bees, and the Negroes with STD’s!

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
ya it was a great stream. Joel is the man

1
1
AWIVR
3 days ago
never relax chat \o

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
unit 8200 in this chat for sure

1
1
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Muslim and Jews are cousins let them have a family fight. White people have to unite around our Race First 1488

2
0
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
Ummm..During World War II, there was collaboration between some Muslim leaders and the Nazi regime, notably Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who spent time in Berlin and met with Nazi officials to discuss shared interests against Allied forces.

1
0

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I cant figure it out. That beard is sus

1
1
Kevin
3 days ago
Mark kills them with kindness it’s awesome

1
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Joel supports a Nazi Azovs fighting Russia and China but fu@k the Palestinians

4
3
Kevin
3 days ago
this is great

@MarkCollett

2
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$3.00
I dont ask. I just say increase the vril lets go. keep on doing great work joeal

2
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Good man Mark

2
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Dead palastinian children and white people being outraged does not stop the jew, white people uniting will.

2
0
Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE

2
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
The challahcaust narrative was not implanted through arguments but through a thorough media campaign of dacades

2
0
Kevin
3 days ago
shabbos rogan audience will figure it out , most ppl watched Alex Jones vs Dr Duke to get here

2
0

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Jewish youth like to wear beanies. Its a cryptokippah

1
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
altruism ONLY for your own race

1
1
Kent
3 days ago
jews arent part of the human race

1
1

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
Palestinians don’t give a shit about the plight of Europeans

2
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
It’s called National Defense for good reason. The ME isn’t Our Nation.

2
0
The Pork Report
3 days ago
Oh, FFS, I don’t care about the Palestinian kids. What about the White children getting raped by muslims, Mark?

1
1
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark is strawmanning now

1
1
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
it almost feels like Mark is purposely misunderstanding Joel

1
1
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel is totally right

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
BULLSHIT Mark

2
2

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
People like Mark are invaluable, not to say that Joel isn’t, but you should respect Mark’s experience in this.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’s a self-sabotaging argument that nationalists should have no humanity. If you don’t have humanity, what moral authority can you have? How can you ask others to follow you? You have to have the moral highground if you expect to be heard.

2
0

@JupiterFive
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
Lack of empathy is lack of humanity and against ns.

2
2

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark is doing the mainstream thing “hurr, let me paint you a clown version of a national socialist and let me show you based on that why you are wrong.”

1
1
The Pork Report
3 days ago
JOEL IS CORRECT. Plus I don’t give a F about Palestinians.

1
1

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
average Palestinian will say “inshallah Britain will be muslim 2080”

2
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Firm disagree with Mark

1
1

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
whites cant be seen as some kind of stewards of all life on this earth. thats extremely dangeous to us. and unfair to have such a massive weight on our shoulders. we must be racially selfish. care about our own. the rest need to look after themselves. not our problem

1
1

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark is on a losing position on this here…

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL boomer

2
2
Blankeon
3 days ago
We cant respect our occupiers

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
David duke style cowardice

2
2

@Mitch
3 days ago
$3.00
Hi great stream question to Joel you said you went to India as a teenager how come you went there?

2
0
Kevin
3 days ago
Dr Duke went to Iran and other countries to speak

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
not in a million years will nonwhites “peacefully” gtfo

3
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
can thank jew worship 100% for the pussification of the White Race

4
2

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Hollywood style clownish “Nazis” are just as bad as nerds in suits. Genuine national socialist ideology is not problematic

3
1

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
$20.00
#Starfieldteam

2
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
$5.00
There’s one thing missing from this conversation and that’s Keith – do you think he’ll do a stream with you about this? he seemed to indicate he wanted to put this to bed in his Substack piece today so maybe not.

2
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@popovacianen
I think we have come quite far in the last 10 years

2
0

@Wolf
1 day ago
I agree with Joel, it’s much easier to be friendly with other species, when they live in there on nations, but it’s and completely different reality, when they invade our country’s and live amongst us.

1
0

@Operation_G
1 day ago
White monster :thumb_up_1:

1
0
mr
1 day ago
Totally agree with Joel on caring nothing about Israel or Palestinians, as for our government causing wars they can also say no to refugees, we don’t have to let them in because no one else does. I agree with Joel that mark hates Jews so much that anyone who opposes them must be lauded. Islam etc hate us and will replace us if given the chance , we must only care about our own , we may sympathise at innocents being harmed but where is the outrage over the genocide of Christian’s in the Middle East , nothing , so this shows Joel’s point perfectly because Mark never mentions their plight.

2
3
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
Don’t misrepresent me, I have done numerous shows about Christians being slaughtered in Syria thanks to Israel’s policies.

5
1

@Callout
2 days ago
looks like Joel is trashing liberalism because it clashes with National Socialism’s core: authoritarian control and suppression of individual rights for the “common good” of the state. Nazis pushed a twisted “collective” vision, subordinate yourself to the Führer and the racial Volk. Whereas liberalism champions personal freedoms, which they saw as chaotic or degenerative. The “common good before people” vibe fits National Socialism’s propaganda.Joel’s hitting liberalism to prop up that collectivist, anti-individual streak.

1
2
Through it, not around it
2 days ago
Signing up to play war games in non-White countries is just way to create more non-White “refugee” immigration into White countries. That’s a fact. So if you’re a dome MAGAtard and you hate non-White “immigrants”, signing up for the military is about as retarded as it gets because it is precisely the foreign actions of White militaries that helps Jews and Jew-adjacents to increase non-White migration. But that’s too hard for a MAGAtard to understand.

1
0

@Evola19
2 days ago
Keef is a joke

1
0
Vid
3 days ago
Many people making the same comment about Joel has a Jewish Telegram mod. Hitler had a Jewish doctor and Jews served in the German military so whats the problem having a random Jew as a friend?

0
1
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago
Or random black or asian ?

0
2
Shamrockshake
3 days ago
why are people accusing him of being a fed?

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Sermon on the Mount morals + materialist hedonism is plaguing the White race ATM imo

1
0
Callaghan
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
100% 0/

0
1
ToffeeL10
3 days ago

@Smidolf
European cowardly traitors who cucked to Ottomans

1
0
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
joel rolling his eyes like a teenage girl is very funny

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago

@fixdsm
How’s the weather in Tel Aviv, shlomo?

1
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
England has an unspoken language of politeness the subtlety of which can be lost on foreigners. Especially if they are Australian.

0
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@Manintoga8888
It took Australian Abbos 10,000 years to invent the stick…and they didn’t even invent it.

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is the real Race First

1
0
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Australians are very retarded on the whole

0
1
Son of Mars
3 days ago
$5.00

1
0
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
the groomers were the ones “inciting racial hatred” through their own actions

1
0

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
it’s never good enough for them and reciprocity is alien to them. Helping them is seen as weakness.

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Canada = New India

1
0
Drake
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
rediculous, he was in a FB group when he was 14 and got kicked out for having the wrong opinions, that isn’t joining Antifa lol

1
0

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
I can’t think of a worse country to visit than India

1
0

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
well joel was in antifa before he became NS, so not as wild as u think

1
0
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
yeah, l say that on a vid from Joel himself.

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
NAUR

1
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Traveling made me extremely pro white and racist in a good way.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Hitler was anti-imperialist for that exact reason.

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
White strike worldwide

1
0
Shamrockshake
3 days ago
love how the church ignores the underprivileged in their own nations.

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Outspoken AntiChrists might as well be SatanicJeews and many are.

1
2

@Esau
3 days ago
hahaha am I really supposed to believe that the international jewish banking families like the Rothschilds gave up some of their wealth to gentile bankers?!

1
0
ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
Ignoring what Israel has been happening in the middle east for 80 years is the best way to help white people?

1
2
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
germans are the true israelittes

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
Positive Christianity was 100% Biblical

0
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
Positive Christianity was not Biblical.

2
1
Hide replies
Carnegie
2 days ago
I think you’ll like the new movie Heretic. I watched it yesterday and thought it was really good. It, surprisingly, stars Hugh Grant, but the dialogue is excellent and whoever wrote it really knows about religion. So probably a jew lol.
Don’t look up what it’s about, just take my word on it.

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the catholic pope created the third reich, there will be no fourth reich without the pope

0
1
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
we are having dead white children by none whites. I have never seen any none whites come out and support the white race

1
0
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
illegal in Canada as well

1
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich was a success and it refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
1
Drake
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
1. It wasn’t Catholic, 2. It hardly failed, it was the most sucussesful attempt at throwing off international jewry and providing a new path forward for europe

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
Maybe Tom Sewell will debate Sven on raw milk next ? eh team ?

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
The Third Reich “Failed” from the OUTSIDE i.e., tons of nations ganging up on them. The ideology and policies of it was sound.

1
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
of*

0
1

@Smidolf
3 days ago
We just need the Americans not to intervene.

1
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$5.00
Test it

1
0
Kent
3 days ago
care for your race is emotional. quit being an autist.

1
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
English grils get raped after helping Palestinians, come on Mark.

1
0
Stefan
3 days ago
Mark :thumbs_down: – Joel :thumbs_up:

1
2

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
Mark loves bluegums. Opinion dismissed.

0
1
Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Mark knows his Nationalism

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
my Palestinian neighbors never called me goy

1
0

@JupiterFive
3 days ago
Mark has far more experience in this area than anyone here.

1
0

@frog.eyes
3 days ago
EUROPA FIRST BITCH!

1
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
catholicism is the seat of white power, the fourth reich refers to the fourth holy roman catholic empire

0
1

@Chris
3 days ago
Wow, bad take from Mark on Joels x ban, Joel wasn’t banned because hes ns… joel was banned because hes anti-jew.

1
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Its because he is Prowhite

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
was supposed to be an upward arrow

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
putting any trust in nonwhites is not smart

2
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@LottaSense
I bet you’ve listened to thousands of hours c rap cadence.

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
look how that worked out

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Join The Great Shunning of Alien Stalkers.

1
0

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
we must be racially selfish. we must be racially exclusive. we must have a racially selfish centered sense of morality.

1
0

@01123581379
3 days ago
Since US is only 57% white the only way to really fix the problem is by having a constitutional convention so it says that Euros have to be more than 2/3rd of the country’s population.

1
0
Hide replies
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
that would be nice but I don’t see that ever happening

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
LOL. Mark loves his cursing

0
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Go Free! w/ CommonSense Nationalism

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
At least we aren’t speaking Ebonics.

1
0

@Daniel
3 days ago
bitch ass nigga hoe

0
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Well said Mark

1
0
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
$10.00
Hey Joel, Tom recently spoke on Keith Woods’ cringeworthy and humiliating and cringeworthy DMs that were leaked by an adult worker he caught feelings for, named Slayter. She dated rappers and was disowned by her family. Why did Keith court her and fall in love with her? Could you psychoanalyse this

2
1

@Mitch
3 days ago

@Glen19
Racism doesn’t have to be yelling racial slurs to be fair.

0
1
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
1920s commies probably were more “right wing” than today’s rightoids

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
you don’t say the 14 words and then say “bad optics” : he’s relitigating the optics war

1
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We are far more schooled than any Nationalist group after WWII

1
0

@01123581379
3 days ago
Joel knows Christ Cucks are weak like Jesus

2
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
if you want the fourth reich in 2033, become a roman catholic papist

0
2
Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
MARK -SPOT ON

2
2

@LottaSense
3 days ago
he’s a race cucked coward

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL no its not

1
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
2

@Esau
3 days ago
Sounds like Joel listens to Alex Linder

0
2
Kevin
3 days ago
“Nationalists” pushing Azov are to be avoided

2
4

@Callout
2 days ago
No, that’s a leap. National socialism isn’t just nationalism with a social twist, it’s a specific ideology tied to Nazism, cooked up by the Nazis with all their baggage: racism, tyranny, and genocide. Nationalism today doesn’t automatically mean national socialism. lt’s not the same beast. You’re conflating a broad idea with a toxic historical invention.

0
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Your telegram moderator is Jewish

3
4

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Another one of these Viiking Adam Green totally not Jewish types

0
3

@Esau
3 days ago

@vettekid407
I don’t want to speak for Joel, but I think he’s been distancing himself from Christianity.

0
1

@Chris
3 days ago
again, conformity is your enemy here.

1
0
Enlightened Despot
1 day ago
100% agree universalism, which came into its own with the Enlightenment is the #1 problem, across the board, in philosophy, politics and in my area, the law.

0
1

@Callout
1 day ago
I’ve been listening to Joel Davis speak for about an hour and a half now, addressing his group of followers. This organization seems destined to fail. The online behavior of their leaders and members demonstrates an inability to engage in respectable conversation, whether with people of other races or even those of their own. I consistently notice these individuals resorting to remarks like “You’re brown, you must be a Jew” and similar nonsense. It appears they can only be civil within their own small circle. This lack of basic conversational ability reveals the sort of people this group attracts. Regardless of what Joel claims, the leaders and members of this organization are incapable of participating in a proper debate or discussion on various platforms. I completely agree with Mark’s assessment.
Having listened to this for 90 minutes, it’s clear Joel continues to make one inaccurate statement after another. See my previous comments. Libertarianism and nationalism as enemies? Does Joel inhabit some fantasy world of his own? Anyone with a practical understanding of reality who watches this will likely think, “I had some reservations about joining, but Joel has resolved them, I will certainly not align myself with a group holding such distorted perspectives.

1
3
Hide replies

@Ol8Inch
1 day ago
Don’t get me wrong I want to like Joel dude but I have to side with Mark on this one. You can claim all day that we only need a small percent of white guys to radicalize to take the country back but it’s just simply not true. You need support from the normies. I know all these damn guys in the US talk all day about how only 3% fought against the crown but it was the fact that the vast majority of the people who weren’t fighting supported the revolutionary cause. The revolution would have never worked if the average everyday settlers would have supported the crown. I know he’s angry, shit I am too. But instead of looking at everyone who does or thinks something you don’t like as beneath you, you need to understand that we are all victims of this subversion. He himself was a fkn antifa fag for shits sake. Instead of acting like white power Jesus he needs to humble himself and start meeting people where they are. We can’t afford to alienate every single white person who does or says something we don’t like. Calling people names and attacking them is only going to ostracize the vast majority of people. That’s probably why his group can only muster up 50 people at a March.

1
0
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago
Mark Collett is a crypto Jew as well, so it is not surprising and PA is backed by an overt Ashkenazi jew named as Natty, Jason Kohne is another crypto agent.

3
5
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Its good you have hard done undesputed evidence to back your claims.

3
0
Hide replies
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago(edited)
Of course I have ..
Collett waves the Jew China Commie Flag

https://i.imgur.com/cJsJwAT.mp4

2
2

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
French and jews can look pretty similar. I’m guessing Mark has Huguenot ancestry. As for Kohne well….

Hide replies
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago(edited)
Must be another Kohencidence, same as Mr Antifa Joel Davis.

https://i.imgur.com/MJk2mHo.mp4

1
1
Captain Myles Keogh
2 days ago
Something not said is that Irishmen don’t need far right politics because they have traditional ethnocentric Irish nationalism. That’s were Keith is coming from.

1
1
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Why does Joel look like a Bum.

2
4
Hide replies
renunciate
2 days ago
Maybe he’s growing out his hair & it’s in a goofy-looking stage right now, so he’s hiding it under a hat? That’s what it looks like to me. You get a little peak at curls when he turns his head. Curly hair can be a wild mess as it grows out.

1
0
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Dont know about curls, but he gives off hube pot smoking bum vibes with the way he looks and speaks. The beard also looks disgusting.

1
0

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
I want my government to stop killing people. Palestinians, Vietnamese, Iraqis I don’t care. It needs to stop.

1
1

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Mark is the best in the Anglosphere right now. We just had a major melt down in the Colonies here. White Nationalism is really not an option in the US. We need a different way. I think Brits could do it tho.

2
2
rex
3 days ago
johadhu davis-singh

0
2

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
lol I give Handsome Truth the credit for that one.

1
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
He’s jew-jacketing Joel, so he’s not acting White

1
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoels enemies always end up being Zogs enemies

2
4

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
Joels mods are just Alex Jones fans. Soros and Zelinsky are Nazis, the EU are Nazis and therefore they all are good.

3
4
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
whites were originally the only race on earth created by christ in his image

0
2

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Do Scandinavians ever have curly hair? My Khazar gene alarm is going off.

1
3
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
germans are the israelites of the bible

0
1

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
your lossing the audience Joel, quick play some gay anime to win them back

1
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Joel is a Fed! Pushing his psychopath nationalism. “Why should I care about dead children if they aren’t white” says Yoel Davis

1
3
Hide replies
Stefan
1 day ago(edited)
Where is the reciprocity? I have not seen Palestinians and other middle easterns condemn all the murders and rapes on Europeans. In my country(Sweden) they work closely with the left and they oppose a Swedish Sweden.

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
every white need to unify under catholicism, the third reich was roman catholic

0
2
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
so this is all false then?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Nazi_Germany

1
0
Hide replies
Siegkreuz
1 day ago
(((wikipedia))) lol

0
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel is going to lead an aryan expedition to fight china over Taiwan

3
6

@fixdsm
3 days ago
What race is Joel?

0
3

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Thats a very Jewy mindset. Shekels for access goy. Khazar vibe alert.

0
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Hey Yoel Davis do you still have a Jewish AZOG supporting Janny moderating your telegram chat?

3
6

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Duke is obsolete for the current times

0
3
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we just need to copy the jews…become super tribal

0
3

@What3
3 days ago
The same strategy jews used against hamas is the same strategy they used against national socialism. On its own national socialism/facism wasnt able to bring down jewry, so jews helped it along, they DID NOT found these movements but they HELPED THEM ALONG behind the scenes. Same way hamas didnt know some of its funding was coming from israel/jews behind the scenes is the same way national socialists and fascists didnt know they were being helped along by their enemy. For example, benito moussolini worked with/for Mi5 before and druing ww1.

0
4
Hide replies

@What3
3 days ago
Damn, people dont get it, im not saying stay away from facism, im talking about being aware of the herzl strategy, dumbasses;
The anti semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti semetic countries our allies – 84, the complete diaries of thedore herzl, proof;
https://i.postimg.cc/9VrQhn4j/unknown.webp

1
2

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis loves when Aryans doe for zog in Ukraine

2
6

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Yea, Jimbo gots it. His psycopathy towards Palestinians reveals a non European genetic element

3
7

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis ” I am a national socialist and that is why I have Jewish telegram moderators

3
7

@Orkin_Man
3 days ago
Who knew, Mark won the debate

2
6

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis wants aryans to fight Russia and China but shits on Palestinians fighting Israel

5
9
Hide replies

@What3
3 days ago
He’s a good guy, he’s just not that bright so he cant see (or doesnt care) about contradictions, like any true purist.

2
7

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Nazi Joel with his Jewish Telegram mods

2
6
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
call out the persecution of Whites should be the focus..holocaust fake or not isnt needed for promoting prowhiteism

0
4
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Focus less on jews and non whites and focus more on our persecution is a better strategy..

0
4
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
big mark W

0
3

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Im Italian. So non white. I can admit it. It was nice to hear from Adam Greens brother tonight

3
8
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Adam Green is good. Me like. I’m done with Christianity.

5
1
Hide replies
Teutonic Truth
1 day ago
AdamGreene should at least change his first name since he is averse to everything Biblical.

1
0
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
Italians are white but if you don’t wanna see yourself as such that’s fine but you don’t speak for all of us, clearly

7
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
3rd reich failed.. .we need better tactics

0
5

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I suspect he has genes from the Ukranian region

1
7
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
screw the holocaust..we dont need to even care about holocaust..just go focus on the victimization of White people directly

0
6
Hide replies
Long Knife
2 days ago
“From 1945 to 2018, the German government paid approximately $86.8 billion in restitution and compensation to Holocaust victims and their heirs. Germany has also identified Nazi-looted objects – including art works, books, and objects within larger collections – and has returned 16,000 objects to survivors and their heirs over the last 20 years. Thousands more pieces of looted art are still missing worldwide. Rising anti-Semitism throughout Europe including in Germany, and especially in former East Germany, coupled with polls showing the need to increase Holocaust education among Germany’s youth, highlight the importance of Germany’s continued dedication to fostering a culture of remembrance.”
https://www.state.gov/reports/just-act-report-to-congress/germany/
don’t worry, NWG & Co. will understand eventually…
“After retirement, Cameron and his wife visited Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial museum in Israel. He thought that the museum’s focus on the personal history of individuals and their stories led to a better understanding of the reality of the Holocaust. Then living in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 1988 he founded his museum with the help of philanthropist (((Daniel Bader))), having collected materials on the African-American experience in the US for many years.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Black_Holocaust_Museum
Less

3
0
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

0
5

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis has a Jewish Azog telegram Mod

1
8

@Smidolf
3 days ago
but the palestinian children

1
9
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
OK..lets say Holocaust proven fake?So what?Doesnt make the persecution of our people less. .we need to just focus on white persecution period..screw the holocaust

0
8
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

0
8

@fixdsm
3 days ago
But he is Jewish. You can tell from demeanor and antipathy

1
10

@Norman
4 hours ago
at least you got all your squibbly wibblies out & about

@Pelasgian
8 hours ago
Honestly, David Duke might be popular among non whites, but how popular is he among whites.

@dnhotd
11 hours ago
all these aspirations and grand plans are just big talk unless you can fulfil and solve the JQ. Can’t do that without gaining power and prominence first. Complete utter catch 22. Only chance is if you slowly and gradually move more rightwing until whites become a near minority and a widespread “awakening” occurs where total electoral and political revolution occurs

Abby Eagle
1 day ago
If you were travelling on a plane with a small child and the cabin should depressurise and an oxygen mask should drop from the ceiling – would you put the mask on yourself 1st or on the child 1st? If you put it on the child first and then you should go unconscious then who is going to take care of the child. You have to make yourself #1 and be like a navy seal before you can take care of others. Too many Westerners are putting themselves and their country second. (This is the NLP Meta Program Attention Direction Sort)
https://www.abbyeagle.com/nlp-coaching-resources/nlp-meta-programs.php

HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
The amount of basedness is off the charts with this one!

@Wolf
1 day ago
Yes, we need ourselves to help ourselves and not trust the invaders they are only here for there own good.

@Callout
2 days ago
around 24 min mark:
Joel, you’re turning reality upside down. Liberalism isn’t against nationalism, it often works with it. Look at liberal democracies like Britain or the U.S.: national pride plus individual rights, no problem. You’re twisting liberalism into some anti-nation bogeyman to prop up your National Socialist pitch. Nazis hated it for its freedoms, not because it kills national identity. That’s your spin, not the truth. you are flipping the world to fit your ideology.

@Callout
2 days ago
around the 20 min in the vid:Joel, you’re off base. Liberalism and democracy aren’t opposites, they often go hand in hand. Liberalism pushes individual rights and representative government, which fits with democracy’s core of people choosing their leaders. Look at liberal democracy: elections plus freedoms like speech. Joel, you might be twisting liberalism into something it’s not, maybe to bash it as weak or globalist. Truth is, they’re not enemies.

Roy Vey
2 days ago
1:01:13
– Very good!

eriksKanal
2 days ago(edited)
You have to cut the head of the dragon. The enemies weapon is the money. They do not have any power without their money. The solution is to create a new currency based on love instead of greed.

@UsilleekHunt
2 days ago
Why is Mark dressed as a Monk

Hide replies
Mark Collett
2 days ago
i love the oversized hoody

@chambleth5
2 days ago
ETLB is low-iq idiocy. It is filled with lies. If you like it, you like lies and your probably kinda stupid.

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Nick Griffen always seemed very credible to me. I’m loving Mark’s failure analysis of the BNP.

Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago
No, it was Griffin who started to steer the movement down the wrong road, check the piece below

1
0

@RonP1
2 days ago
Actually I’ve updated that as there was 6 pages, check the new one below
https://odysee.com/@RonP1:8/IMG_1151_IMG_1152_IMG_1153_IMG_1154_IMG_1155_IMG_1156:1

1
0

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
Thanks!

1
0
The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
big if true

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Callaghan might be the best Starfielder ?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
good anyway

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
lol , good one

@LottaSense
3 days ago
GO CALLAGHAN

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
Is Joel a Sikh!

Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I started wearing a beanie when I moved to the PNW. I really like having my ears covered.

1
1

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
test stream?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
IMPORTANT DISCUSSION

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
good stream

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
GREAT STREAM

@popovacianen
3 days ago
STARFIELDTEAM \o

@SonOfOdin
3 days ago
good stream

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
o/

Callaghan
3 days ago
14

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
o/

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
o/

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
o/

@LottaSense
3 days ago
GN o/

Kevin
3 days ago
14 & 88 o/ Heil

@Smidolf
3 days ago
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Blood and Honour

Kevin
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

Kevin
3 days ago
sinecure

AWIVR
3 days ago
can we get one last #starfieldteam from joel before he goes

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@fixdsm
you are White relax Brother

Kevin
3 days ago
this was kismet

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
:joy: :joy:

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
rent free

collatz
3 days ago
popular figures, each taking part of the correct view, and part of the wrong view, arguing with each other. can’t imagine a better way to stymie organization and effectiveness

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
we know yer both eskimos

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Great stream

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I’ve got that t-shirt in blue ha

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD is like a heat seeking missile zeroing on the target

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
well, since you asked

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
commie jew fed

@popovacianen
3 days ago
can i call joel a cunt tho

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
\\\ o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Thanks great stream, Joel you are great

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Great stream o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@LottaSense
o/

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Joel hasn’t even drank any gin during this whole show? Crazy.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I support Joel’s Adidas Classic wear

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Jimbo
any evidence ?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@fixdsm
You are not white

@Esau
3 days ago
Heil Joel and heil Mark! WFP!

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
There’s always one or two…

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
exactly

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
some real retards in here. light switch brains

Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Kosher switch.

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
SAS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@LottaSense
me too

@LottaSense
3 days ago
I’m old enough to remember the saying, “Death Before Dishonor”

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s a testament to you two that it didn’t degenerate into a monkey, shit slinging contest in view of the subject matter.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Total agree

@RonP1
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
bingo…blood brothers

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs arent attacking jews they are both the same tribe, fake fighting to get foreign aid from white countries

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Albanians tried it the hard way and look at them now, just another mongrel horde.

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
spot on!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Great conversation

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Great conversation, very good

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I missed this, I’ll have to wind it back

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
SHUT IT DOWN

@Smidolf
3 days ago
They survived and stayed very blonde and blue eyed.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
attack and invite

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Tommys still got the balance to pay on his loans from Robert Shillman

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Would you rather have white Islam or brown “western” societies

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
I like Muslims in the middle east fighting zionist scum

@Esau
3 days ago
Based Charles Martel

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I want everybody to go back home so I can concentrate my hate on the French again.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Esau
look at their flag

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@Smidolf
bosnians arent a real thing you have bosniaks(muslims) serbians(orthodox) croatian(catholic)

@Esau
3 days ago
What’s with the Starfield lore? I’m in the dark on that one.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago

@Smidolf
why is it multiple choice? I don’t want either anywhere near me

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Lol this is like the rebellious adventurous son having out with his cringe out of touch Gen X dad

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
I found British humor to be alot dryer and clever, it might have gone over starfields head

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
I dare you to interview norm, mark ….interview norm, straight to jail

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel is a nazi fighting Zogs enemies.

@Esau
3 days ago

@fixdsm
STFU

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
we have problems with other groups.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Joel is one of the best guys in this thing

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I rather live next to a Bosnian than to a Negro.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
We can be civil with them, but we don’t need them speaking for us like Robinstein does

@RonP1
3 days ago
Kosher Nationalist

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
rainbow formally white countries u mean

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
never heard of joel before

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@fixdsm
joel looks scotish swedish mix, some sort of nordic viking

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago

@Esau
Yeah but they can carry sand and critters just fine.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Aussies, cultured thugs ?

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
british isles are my homelands too.

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Aboriginals built Australia, they carried all that scorched sand and venomous animals there for millions of years

Kevin
3 days ago
Aye up mates o/ too

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
all jannies are jews and masons tbf

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@LongKnife1934
lol

Long Knife
3 days ago
just wait till you get a couple beers in them

Kevin
3 days ago
are they all nuts

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
not even being mean

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
ive known many aussies to be fair

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@fixdsm
joking ?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@fixdsm
What about it?

Mr Iggs
3 days ago

@RonP1
did they invent the digareido?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@fixdsm
Welsh/AngloSaxon

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Muppet Nationalism team

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Abos turned Australia into a desert pooping all over the continent.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
the Jim Henson approach

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Good show, guys, great discussion

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
I want muh muney fukn

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
This has been a great stream tbf

Kevin
3 days ago
these Starfield guys are out of control like Randbot

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is a real one

@Esau
3 days ago
Do you accept HawkTuah coins, Mark?

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
if all Australian men were like JD Australia would be an ethno-state in 24 hrs

Callaghan
3 days ago
FUG YOU PAY ME

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Misers

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
pay up, bitch

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lol

AWIVR
3 days ago
pay what you owe chat

Drake
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
can you take your talking points back to 2017

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
You don’t have to “fake” that call-out to recognize its benefit to you.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Esau
it’s a nightmare

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
did an indian parasite eat your funnybone?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is the future o/

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
…and both the holohoax and Palestine are opportunities for calling out the people who persecute us.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Hail Davis

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
The Starfield Question

@Esau
3 days ago
INCREDIBLE India, saaar

@LottaSense
3 days ago
yes they do have curly/wavy hair too

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
cope

Callaghan
3 days ago
WHITE POWER JOEL 0/

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I love those that hate Israel and you should too, Khazar

@Lone
3 days ago
Correct.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Shamrockshake
It really is. Jeets are everywhere.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is solid

AWIVR
3 days ago
the starfield stare

AWIVR
3 days ago
More

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Manintoga8888
Kent ate his funny bones

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
joel hitting the chat with that starfield stare

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Maldric
Australians also did the Ocean dub of DBZ

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Good point superchatter

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
make it happen haha

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Australians are only interesting because of a shitty Bethesda game. sad.

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@Esau
the bible warns against tolerating fake jews, we havent been practicing that

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
Todd Howard owns Australia

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
what? was that meant to relate to the relevance of the holohoax?

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD waxes eloquent for half an hour or one word response… nothing in between, lol.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
#Starfieldteam

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
#Starfieldteam

@LottaSense
3 days ago
thats a messed up thing to say to joel

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
lol

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
ive never washed the feet of a pajeet imperial, can you say the same

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
turned out it had the opposite effect, lmao

0KT0BER
3 days ago
https://xcancel.com/Ehrenkrieg2

@glider
3 days ago
‘enriching’ lol

@Smidolf
3 days ago
USAID program lol

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
I also have it on good authority that aussies are light weights when it comes to drinking

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
doubleteamingfield team!

AWIVR
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@8BigMatt88
I miss the aryan death-stare he used to do

Australian Nativist
3 days ago
Let’s do this again fellas. This was tough, but worthwhile.

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
Acts 17 promotes nationalism, but beyond that the Bible doesn’t offer much in the way of good advice for Whites to defend our nations against invaders.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
no..Israel bombing kids is in the now and relevant..but again..Media antiwhite…Netflix antiwhite..Govmnt antiwhite is way more effective than even caring about Israel bomning..screw Israel..focus is on OUR PEOPLE and that we are persecuted

AWIVR
3 days ago
joel scaring the hoes

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
wp o/

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Jews are just another sort of sandnegroes believing to be especially important.

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
based stoic White man.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is just authentic. Wasn’t funny.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Joel is in WAR mode lol

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD dead pan humour

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Keep on topic. Drop the soap opera stuff

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
they are not connected to the bible

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
modern jews are from turkey

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Psychoanysis is jewish

Drake
3 days ago
Author of the book “Positive Christianity” was arrested and sent to a concentration camp on the personal orders of Adolf Hitler himself. lol

Son of Mars
3 days ago
An important step in destroying narrative control is to demystfy the enemy’s sacred cows. It helps that it’s built off of disprovable lies.

0KT0BER
3 days ago
lol

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
Exactly

@Smidolf
3 days ago
The only thing they don’t allow is Whites only.

Kevin
3 days ago
we were talking about this on Heel turn in 2019 Joel

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
o/

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
very much like saying “don’t look at israel bombing kids” …you’re just throwing important history that supports your perspective in the trash if you don’t look at people like Germar Rudolf’s work

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
this ^

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
It’s always worrisome when someone is just getting started and think they have it all figured out.

0KT0BER
3 days ago
For sourced facts on the spirituality of the Reich see:
https://xcancel.com/Ehrenkrieg2

@RonP1
3 days ago
So we have to accept complete BS, this = Great Britain in 2025

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
That’s why they made any discussion of it de-facto illegal.

Kevin
3 days ago
shabbos cracker

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
beanies are comfy

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Im getting Salty Cracker vibes off of this guy

@glider
3 days ago

@fixdsm
cool mornings right now

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
oh okay cool

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@fixdsm
early onset balding

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Mass exposure of the truth surrounding the holohoax needs to happen. Heavy handed Jewish censorship of the truth is not possible in the information/Internet age. The truth regarding this event needs to go mainstream

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s winter in Starfield

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@whitedrake
I know man, I’m just posting the raw on the source for the jew nonsense that gets posted here and elsewhere

Drake
3 days ago
https://x.com/DarkRavenVolk/status/1903426483944636689

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Why is an aussie wearing a beanie? Is it even cold down there?

Drake
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
lol:

@Jimbo
3 days ago

@Brutusch
Hitler cared about Palestinians you f*cking FED

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
good question

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
Gall is a Jew with an agenda

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
that axs well

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Richard Steigmann-Gall the former Director of the Jewish Studies Program published The Holy Reich through Cambridge University Press, which explored Nazi conceptions of Christianity in 2003

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Sven should do a cooking show

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It was the allies fault for destroying the supply lines

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Lmao, joining WN to save the Palestinians

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Does Keith still associate with Nick Fuentes? Is this the reason why he sounds more cucked now?

Kevin
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
110%

collatz
3 days ago
the first 50% of this regarding directness, totally makes sense. rejecting stances on and engagement w/ foreign policy I just don’t get

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
test it

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Keith is scared

Kevin
3 days ago
he will fold fast

@Esau
3 days ago
The Joel versus Drew Pavlou debate was great

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is a wimp

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Keith’s got cold feet maybe

Kevin
3 days ago
Are people retarded in Starfield ? what’s in the water there

Callaghan
3 days ago
Yeah DEBATE TIME

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
maybe randbots not a unique case

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
lol

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
are all Australians as dumb as randbot?

Kent
3 days ago
expsure. lol thats keiths mo. ally with catboy nick for the views
then tries to pull a moral fag argument

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Here is a JPOST headline from right now: “Gaza relocation plan begins: 70 Gazans depart for Europe”.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
o/

@fixdsm
3 days ago
This is why the Jews have no problem making non whites fear white nationalists.

@glider
3 days ago
Keiths strength is writing more than live debate

Cone of Silence
3 days ago
83% of Americans were opposed to going to war with Germany before pearl harhour

The Goyim Report
3 days ago
isn’t Keith and Nick Fuentes boyfriends

@Esau
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
1488 o/

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Purposefully misunderstanding Joel

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
Now I understand what Stryker was saying about these goofballs.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
yes. It’s not as though they extend the same to us. Why are Whites the only ones expected to partake in this sort of performative altruism?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
14 words says it all and 88 precepts

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Keith O’Brien?

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
moot point from mark, i agree with joel

Drake
3 days ago
that isn’t what Joel said lol

Kevin
3 days ago
different things work for different countries

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
It is not collateral damage. It is the deliberate and purposeful mass murder of innocent children, babies and civilians. We must condemn these demons. We should be appalled by what they are doing and getting away with

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I would never ally with someone without empathy for anyone other than their own small Jewy tribe

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I’m still pissed Albanians and Bosnian didn’t return home after the war.

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
Whites need to stop giving a f* about everyone else. SPECIALLY when WE already have more than enough problems to focus on

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
agree joel

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
But your country doesn’t have only white people, right?

@Esau
3 days ago
r/JoelDavisTheSupremeGentleman

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s tactical Joel

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Well said, Joel

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
think about two things st once? Joel cant hold all these limes

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Give me a break. This is antiithetical to whiteness

collatz
3 days ago
If 10 billion of your tax dollars per year were being sent to Perth to pay for this kid’s broken arm, yes, you should care about it.

Kevin
3 days ago
r/thejoel

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Kent
LOL

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
They are going through them to get to you fool.

Kent
3 days ago
joel is a modderator on r/iameuphoric

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs wont attack jews they are the same tribe

Kevin
3 days ago
Arabs are like Hispanics they president is always Whiter than the population

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Oooga booga. Only my tribe matters

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The British made the bed of the Palestinians. Get a grip, Joel

@Esau
3 days ago

@Kent
How dare you slander God’s Chosen People!!!

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
you know what is popular? Being a cold psychopath weirdo.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Israel couldn’t do what they’ve done to Palestine without the money & militaries from our countries

@01123581379
3 days ago
Joel doesn’t get that we won’t get paid back from the jews leaching off white countries so it’s not just about killings

Kevin
3 days ago
most “Arabs” in Syria and Lebanon have White admixture from Britain and France Sykes Picot agreement era

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I remember my father showing us National Geographic journals with pictures from starving Negroes when we wasted food. I never cared about the Negroes lol

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Thats a very negroid mindset

The Pork Report
3 days ago
100%

@Chris

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago

@Chris
agreed

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
BASED

collatz
3 days ago
Do you think you can bring about “cutting them off” without engaging w/ the shit they’re doing in Gaza?

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs and jews are the same tribe, they wont attcak each other

@Esau
3 days ago
Live Pay-Per-View event: Watching the Muslims destroy Israel hahaha

@Mitch
3 days ago
I didn’t expect to go this deep

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark should make a bigger and constant stink about white girls being raped in england, than whining about brown people in a third world country.

Kent
3 days ago
the moral argument is the only force pushing back against the jews in the west so far

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
So don’t try to make jews the Pariahs of the world by highlighting their crimes? Good thinking.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
treat others the way they treat you and your people

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
exactly

@01123581379
3 days ago
IF all arabs and jews died our world would be ten times better

Kevin
3 days ago
rational but people remember Joel was America First , he’s more hardcore now which is good

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is right

The Goyim Report
3 days ago
Palestinians and Israelis wiping each other out would be the best outcome

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
We can’t care about terrible things all over the world.

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Its your money killing their children

Son of Mars
3 days ago
*matters

@01123581379
3 days ago
MOOOOOSLIM!!!

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
What Joel just said is what I think.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
o/

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
good point Joel

Australian Nativist
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Yes. They should have prepared better for this discussion. It

collatz
3 days ago
And if we’re basically going to recuse ourselves from any perspective on foreign engagement, we’ve just thrown the largest and most affective arena of politics in the trash. that’s absurd

@fixdsm
3 days ago
i

Son of Mars
3 days ago
We have to destroy our enemy to win. Israel is our enemy. Forget about Palestine, what to me as an American is Israel controls DC, and is essentially a foreign occupational force.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Good lord

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
Mark getting nervous

@01123581379
3 days ago
supporting Israel is not pro white

The Pork Report
3 days ago
We oppose the wars because they harm Whites, I DGAF about Palestinians.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
White people need to unite not divide over other races

Kevin
3 days ago
this is brothers talking past each other

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
you cant trust them if we want to make our own institutions and clubs

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
imo

@Chris
3 days ago
? What? what exactly is mark arguing here for? i feel like Mark argues past joel, joel is saying “My own country first.” and Mark argues “world police”???

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Obviously we don’t need to take EITHER side with other races’ conflicts.

Kevin
3 days ago
exactly you don’t want to go around making more enemies

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Indianization of America is the best thing that could happen now. The pajeets will totally neutralize America’s ability to do the bidding of yids

Drake
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
you cannot help them without throwing off the Jew which requires focusing on ourselves in the first place

Callaghan
3 days ago
100% Joel TEAM WHITE

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Anglo compassion VS Aussie fire and heart

@01123581379
3 days ago
white countries need to stop being cowards and say they want white super majorities

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
all whites need to unify under roman catholicism, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Nah man, we should totally die for the Jews. Gods chosen after all

Kevin
3 days ago
maybe Starfield has different Arabs ? in USA they just run restaurants

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
I give a shit

Son of Mars
3 days ago
No, frame it as Israel is your enemy, has purchased traitors ans silences us with media control. They are the occupiers of our capitals in the west. forget the browns, that’s not what it’s about.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
White First thinking means we don’t fight for jews.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
both?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Is mark stupid or deaf?

Brosey
3 days ago
exactly, so screw it

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Hannity• Vance 2028

@LottaSense
3 days ago
now the world police is DEI

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Every decent nationalist should condemn the deliberate slaughter of innocent children, babies and civilians by Zionist Jewry. They are demonic scum who get away with deliberate mass murder because of their control of Western governments & the mass media

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Of course take our own side, but let’s exploit the enemies weakest front too.

@Mitch
3 days ago
3 hour stream? l

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’s getting a bit muddled.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Israel doesn’t deserve to exist because they can’t without the US

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE fug the nons….

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
but what would normus do?

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Well said, Joel!

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Israel is nothing without our help.

Kevin
3 days ago
left and right it’s 2025 ? they both are run by scum

collatz
3 days ago
…but the mainstream is retarded. What do you actually understand about the conflict?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NO! Nats are dif

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Joel is not wrong

Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago

@LottaSense

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Take our own side

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
100%

@01123581379
3 days ago
Iraq war stopped the US from having Mag Lev coast to coast

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@LottaSense
its the reason why people like Candice Owens are so successful

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is 100% correct about everything so far

Callaghan
3 days ago

@JupiterFive
Empathy for your Own kind is fine….

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel is essentially the occupational army. you have to defeat them.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
But why Mark?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Why invest any emotion into foreign conflicts if we need it for ourselves.

Kevin
3 days ago
this reminds me of the debate where Moike schooled himfor 2 hours

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
HUGE JOEL W

@Esau
3 days ago
Take things from jews, the winners. They operate based on moral particularism i.e., what is good for the jews is what is good.

Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago

@SerenaJB

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I just care about the White race now.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Why are we complicating things? It’s so obvious the wooden door brigade = all the worlds problems

@LottaSense
3 days ago
sad that some White people are so afraid and paralyzed they think they need the approval and support of nons who hate White people far more than they will ever hate jews

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
But bad things are happening all over the world, we are very selective about who we care about.

Callaghan
3 days ago
I dont like seeing White Girls getting gang raped by the mongrel hoardes

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Whites first and only.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
I don’t care about the Middle East.

@Chris
3 days ago
“oh, let me whine about brown people in a country, that will help me in my country.”

Kevin
3 days ago
ghoulish

AWIVR
3 days ago
A10 aryan eyes

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
the CCP is a big problem to Canada as well.

@Mitch
3 days ago
Good points on both sides

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Has Mark commented yet on Joels beautiful eyes?a

@Chris
3 days ago
This is so tedious, We shouldn’t give a damn about brown people in countries that are not ours… we should care about asserting dominance, gaining power and recover our nations.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
All we have to do is defund the jews and refuse to fight for them, that will defang them.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Mark wins again

@Esau
3 days ago
R-tards still think Georgie Boy Bush was the one thinking up all those ME wars hahaha it was the jewish neo-cons under him.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Then they focused in on Ireland out of sheer spite.

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
whats with the whiny pouty tone all of a sudden?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel is a mortal enemy. You have to defeat them, politically or otherwise, to regain sovereignty.

Kevin
3 days ago
yeah

@collatz

collatz
3 days ago
But nobody other than y’all is framing this in terms of a fundamental emotional motivation. We just recognize how killing children is nasty af

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
get him

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Muzzies and Jeews don’t belong In Europe.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
The dominance of Israel in the ME comes from us not being in control of our nations.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago

@Esau
o/

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
more camera phones for both sides, let the tik tocker see who the real barbarians are…..

Callaghan
3 days ago
Empathy for Nons is Pointless////

@Clyde
3 days ago
Joel’s got this; Mark has experience but …this has got us nowhere

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Shut the borders and it’ not our fcking problem anymore.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Joel is on the right side of this, imo

collatz
3 days ago
“If it wasn’t Israel” …nobody said we don’t have a motivation to focus on this. Wtf is your point there Joel?

@Esau
3 days ago

@LiquidZ00
\\ o/

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
That’s right!

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
they’re not coming here because muh genocide….they’re coming here because jews and our traitorous governments

@RonP1
3 days ago
Let’s not forget the part the Jews dupes the Freemasons are playing in all this

@Chris
3 days ago
that is the issue here, holding firm on to things that didn’t work, don’t work and won’t work.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, MARK

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Pakistan was never bombed, yet they flood into England

Drake
3 days ago
White people need to look inwards and focus on our own above all else in order to throw off the Jewish shackles which will in the end eliminate their power and ability to do what they do re expanding Israels borders unopposed in the first place.

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@LottaSense
Exactly. Always appeasing.

Callaghan
3 days ago
FUG TEAM BROWN

Son of Mars
3 days ago
I hate Israel because they control our politicians, used us like mercenaries, silenced us and spilled our blood

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
we are not obligated to be the world police….folk first!

@LottaSense
3 days ago
beta males always want the easy way out

collatz
3 days ago
No, we’re not pretending. It’s genuinely messed up what happens there. I still care more about my own people. This makes zero sense.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

@Chris
3 days ago
Nobody is saying go out with swastikas tattooed on your forehead… joel is saying, whites first, whites first, whites first and principles matter the most.

Callaghan
3 days ago
Brown Arabs raping little White Girls not siding with them…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
WEAK argument

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Fist you have to take your county back to be in control.

meaty
3 days ago
agreed

@glider
3 days ago
problem is you end up devoting your emotional and intellectual energy to someone elses problems

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
No, the likes of Dr Duke and Lucas Gage support Palestine because they understand history and are genuinely moral

@Chris
3 days ago

@jagdeepjano
yeah? what did marks experience achieve so far? right… nothing.

Kevin
3 days ago
Balfour agreement is enough reason to hate isreal , they killed American sailors and British soldiers

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
I like the Palestinians more than Australians. Palestinians never say shit like Nauurrr or make 50 different variations of the same cooking show.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@LiquidZ00
^

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
American jets

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
catholicism is the seat of white power, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
The average white guy you are talking about needs to be educated on the Palestine issue and global Zionism. Ignorant grug nationalists are useful idiots for the Jewish control establishment

@frog.eyes
3 days ago
its a tough debate, shame we’re seemingly stuck in the infighting stage forever

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I like how the Chinese deal with Moslems.

@Esau
3 days ago
Focus on what non-Whites are doing to innocent WHITES!

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@VrilPilled
Exactly.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
support are the folk

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s illegal to fight in isreal unlike Ukraine …….another point of contention

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Richard Steigmann-Gall the former Director of the Jewish Studies Program published The Holy Reich through Cambridge University Press

collatz
3 days ago
How does spending some attention on the horrifying shit that comes out of the Levant, and being genuine about it, immediately destroy your first-priority of your own people? That makes no sense.

Drake
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
other peopels nationalism / nationalism result isn’t our responsibility

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
very weak

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
how can mark even want to talk to muzzies after what they did to all of these british girls

@Prussnblk
3 days ago
Hard to say you stand on principle and also don’t care about genocide

@Chris
3 days ago

@Mitch
i hope not, because Mark is simply wrong on this issue.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
So, Joel, is your Nationalism not consentient?

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
kin first

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Aryan = Noble, and Mark has the noble outlook on this

The Pork Report
3 days ago
I’m so sick of Whites being exhorted to care about other races. They do nothing for us, and most of them hate us.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Then enemy of my enemy is my friend

@Mitch
3 days ago
Is anyone siding with Mark here?

Kevin
3 days ago
Real Politic = you have to deal with people you don’t like

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark seems to think that the weaker position and approach is the one doing the trick, it does the trick, it does the jewish trick of whites fading out.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark has the human, compassionate, Aryan attitude

Callaghan
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
0/

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Race First

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel has its boot on our throat. Anything useful in destroying the enemy is good.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Yes! Take our OWN side

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE JOEL

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Mark is giving off Farage vibes here.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
We can sell weapons to both of them.

Brosey
3 days ago
FIRST PRINCIPLES

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
i don’t see his argument as falling apart at all

collatz
3 days ago
Why should your White motivations for opposing isreael prevent genuine opposition to genocide by the same people you already oppose? how tf is that “faking”? and if it is wtf?

Drake
3 days ago

@Spozzfreund
100%

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
neither

Kevin
3 days ago
agree to disagree if you

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is a man of principle. Is this so hard to understand?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
When have White nationalists ever been pushed into the arms of Tommy Robinson? It only works the other way.

@Chris
3 days ago
this is so stupid… Strawman arguments.

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
what???

Kevin
3 days ago
Isreal are killing kids on tv

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel delenda est Israel must be destroyed …The Israelis are the Red Coats in this revolution.

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
the problem is that these non-white antisemites are almost always antiwhite as well, and I would always bet those who claim they are not are liars

Kevin
3 days ago
silver lining

Drake
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
in return, palestinians living in the west will post anti-white content at the drop of the hat, we have all seen it

Kevin
3 days ago
it makes the Jews look bad to support Palestine

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Boers don’t like pedo anime crap.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Rand must answer for that

AWIVR
3 days ago
it got him into a huge breakup fight with Dingo over it

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AWIVR
Yeah fug That i luv the Boer 0/

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s about networking irl : Rockwell talked others

@LottaSense
3 days ago
holy shit

AWIVR
3 days ago
yes way lol

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Advocating for Palestine is the morally sound, nationalist position

@LottaSense
3 days ago
no way he said that

AWIVR
3 days ago
“I would rather have a Palestinian as a neighbor than a Boer” -randbot2020

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is mad at Moike ? ? ? wtf

@LottaSense
3 days ago
sounds like Mark is falling for the non with an outstretched hand while hiding the knife behind its back

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Look what happened after 3 children being killed the Muslims and none whites collectives against white people

Drake
3 days ago

@Brutusch
yeah what is the point of this, mark is banned too lol

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
why was it called the third reich?

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
There are plenty pro-white people on social media – it’s only the ones who name jewish power that get kicked off.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Mark is not engaging with what Joel is saying

Callaghan
3 days ago

@CosmicPepe
0/

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Kevin
3 days ago
they deported Jews from some South American country for grooming forget which one

@RonP1
3 days ago
Jews like to bet on all the Horses in the race

0KT0BER
3 days ago
hows it going Tel Aviv

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
(((antisemitic point of no return)))

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL dumb boomer

AWIVR
3 days ago
supreme gentleman

0KT0BER
3 days ago
The source of the ‘Holy Reich’ nonsense:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Steigmann-Gall

@Esau
3 days ago
hahaha Joel is an Eliot Rodgers appreciator?! JK

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
You get kicked off social media for talking about jewish power

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@LottaSense
You are Obsolete. I bet you have listened to thousands of hours of c rap cadence and pretend it’s music.

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
100%

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Oh, that’s worked so far, Joel

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
TEAM WHITE =no Mamzers

Kevin
3 days ago
BAP ppl & Luke Ford type NRx ppl are kosher antisemites

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Disagree. Uniting with other groups to defeat the Jews is sensible and what organized Jewry fears the most (the Protocols talk about this). Their power and grip is truly global. Myopic focus is not the solution

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I always come back and realise Mark was right

Kevin
3 days ago
14

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel delenda est.

@Esau
3 days ago
The vast majority of Whites who support Israel are doing it because their Bible and/or Churches tell them that’s how they get to heaven.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL6

Kevin
3 days ago
keep your eyes on the enemy exactly Mark

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the catholic pope created the third reich, there will be no fourth reich without the pope

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
well, this is just stupid, sry.

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@GaelicNord
very good example

collatz
3 days ago
“we can’t talk w/ anyone until we have basically total power” …really?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
lol

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Lucas Gage is a mixed-up cuck.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
give them to carrot first, then the stick, understand?

Kevin
3 days ago
Who cares if people support Palestine, I don’t care about it. it’s an example of international Jewish power to the rest of he world though.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
We have tried all this none white crap. 1488 say it all

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Exactly, non-Whites are an energy drain. We DON’T need anybody else.

Callaghan
3 days ago
GO OFF KING!

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
quit naming CCG

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@BobMatthews
sadly you’re right.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Callaghan
3 days ago
Eugene Terblanche work with black and they killed him…

Kevin
3 days ago
who’s Joel taking about ?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
they cannot conceive of honesty or honor

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
BLACK Marcus Garvey worked with the KKK to return Blacks. Have you lot read any Nationalist texts? Mark Collett

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
you seriously believe, that talks with non-whites will lead to non-whites agreeing for the deportation of their fellow non-whites?? thats just… any non-white will immediately think “ok, i can’t trust them, i will be definitely next, so i won’t help them.”

@Clyde
3 days ago
Joel is not larping – Joel knows the friend/enemy distinction – we are after our share of the pie from a position of power

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Shamrockshake
those schlubs hate to pass on inheritances to their children

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
You work with people who have the same interests as you do. Not with people who’s interests are in conflict with yours.

@Mitch
3 days ago
Joel responded well

The Pork Report
3 days ago
It’s ridiculous to expect White altruism from non-Whites.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@LottaSense
Absolutely.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
exactly!!

collatz
3 days ago
“then we’ll sit down from a position of strength”…we’ll sit down once we’ve won. How American.

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
not all, not all, but most

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
100%

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Joel’s lost me here…

Kevin
3 days ago
you’ll need economic allies when you do take power

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
yes

WP Combat
3 days ago
I agree with Joel here.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Joel is right. We don’t need to worry about jews and other nons who will lie about us regardless.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Blood and Honour

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
we need boomer money

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
The game was rigged from the start. We’re not gonna win by playing by the rules created BY our enemies to keep US down.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
What’s the point of cosying up to non-Whites who are in our homelands?

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
So, if you engage with brown people, you can convince them to leave peacefully?

@Esau
3 days ago
Lamp-post…or lampshade? lol

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
non-whites will never agree that they are a cancer. Pandering to them is pointless, especially rn

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
The People of Starfield must extend across the whole galaxy of nationalism

Kevin
3 days ago
Boneface type Hollywood acts

collatz
3 days ago
there’ll probably be places where exchange b/t White and nonwhite groups are relevant before anyone’s resiliently established too, but fine to say “as we’re ready / it makes sense”

BobMatthews
3 days ago
I say we need around 30% of Whites on the same page ideologically to start reversing the current trajectory..

The Pork Report
3 days ago
“Politeness” is how we got here. Optics cuckery.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
i think the point is if u engage with one you could end up convincing sending 100s back rather than sending 1 back or 1 family and that is the end of i, still in the same position

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
agreed Joel

@Chris
3 days ago
this is all blah blah and grasping at straws, we whites need to assert dominance over our own countries and we don’t do that by bending the knee to the browns.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
BLACK Marcus Garvey worked with the KKK to return Blacks. Have you lot read any Nationalist texts?

@MarkCollett

@Clyde
3 days ago
preach it Joel! White Power!

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
what did the TALK do? what came from it?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
well said Joel

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Focus on our people first. I agree.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
We don’t negotiate with invaders

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
Wholesome chungus nationalism is not gonna work mark

Drake
3 days ago

@schintzellove
we are comparing to NSDAP, they didn’t have to face that

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is solid

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Mark did this when he had the SSNP on for a discussion, and they discussed the need for the Syrian refugees in Europe to be repatriated.

Kevin
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
National Socialist Front did that

meaty
3 days ago

@whitedrake
yes they do

@Esau
3 days ago
We should all wire money to Beijing, Moscow and Tehran
, and ask them to neutralize ZOG for us lol

Brosey
3 days ago
fundamentals first

Blankeon
3 days ago

@whitedrake
Exactly. Totally different situations.

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
worked nicely didn’t it? this is retarded, sorry to say, all you do is play the little cuck who tries to appease the bull.

@Clyde
3 days ago
no, no, no – I’m nothing but polite and legal and Iface threats and harassment everyday – organized harassment – no co-operation with nons

@glider
3 days ago
Exactly

Brosey
3 days ago
you dont worry about that until later

Drake
3 days ago
Germans didn’t have millions of non-whites living in their communities throughout Germany

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
yes Joel!

collatz
3 days ago
has anyone suggested letting non-Whites into organizations, rather than just working w/ them where it’s practical?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, MARK

@Esau
3 days ago
Maybe we can convince the non-White nations to neutralize ZOG for us?…

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AWIVR
0/

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
they only want to help for selfish reasons. usually they hate their own. many are not trustworthy

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
What about the NSDAP’s SS non-White divisions? Ask him about that

AWIVR
3 days ago
WPWW

@Chris
3 days ago
You won’t get non-whites to help you vote your way out of this, nor will they help you to get rid of them.

BobMatthews
3 days ago
yeah the post ww2 Spielberg narrative is so strong and prevalent its so diffucult for mid wits to shrug it off…

The Pork Report
3 days ago
WHITE POWER

Callaghan
3 days ago
WHITE POWER

rex
3 days ago
hoteps

The Pork Report
3 days ago
We don’t need non-Whites. Let them take care of themselves. Whites are too altruistic, and it’s a one-way street.

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
sry guy, the only peaceful talk we will have is how you will play along when i deport you from my country, this can go down in two ways, i prefer the peaceful route.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
You also have to react to the fact that civilisation and nationhood per se are under attack across the board.

@Mitch
3 days ago
I can see both sides

@RonP1
3 days ago
Colin Jordan?

Blankeon
3 days ago
The NS Germans could respect non-Whites who were fighting against the Jew World Order in their own territories. But the non-Whites were not allowed to be citizens in Europe. That is the difference from today.

@Fatty
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
This is such a poor question

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
says you as a non-white?

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the fourth reich can only be roman catholic as it refers to the fourth holy roman catholic empire

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
problem is duke thinks we should just demand our rights rather than taking them

Kevin
3 days ago
Being Civil isn’t hard , We have different populations of Arabs in USA vs UK . The rich Arabs go to America , the grooming stuff doesn’t happen here like in other places

@Chris
3 days ago
I don’t get this “let’s talk to non-whites about our political issues.” what does it do’? like seriously… yeah ok, they might agree or disagree, now what?

collatz
3 days ago
it’s just shit stirring

@Esau

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
the most successful nations today are patriarchal ethnostates. you can’t ignore that

@Mitch
3 days ago
Mark seems a bit softer in approach than Joel.

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
NS is exclusively Roman Catholic?! WTF are you smoking, dude?

@RonP1
3 days ago
They’re deliberately putting darkies in schools in remote areas in the hope they might mix with white girls

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel is right!We need to unite white and stay white

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Spot on, Mark

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
therein lies the problem

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
national socialism is exclusively roman catholic, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire. the fourth reich can only be roman catholic

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
WP o/

Son of Mars
3 days ago
white power o/

Kevin
3 days ago
Woody o/

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
Joel is right. balkanize like the other groups or we are toast!

@Esau
3 days ago
“White power is the name of the game” – Joel Davis, 2025. LFG!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Hope Mark is taking note. Protests and leaflets are not enough. WOODLANDER’s position is my my position, now.

@ArabSocialNationalist

meaty
3 days ago
i’m posting my bird back to Thailand.

AWIVR
3 days ago
white people should be picking up sticks and watching paint dry

Kevin
3 days ago
Somalis do not belong in England or New England

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
you say it’s incentive based, and yet removing the incentive can’t overlap to “alliance” on issues like opposing israel? do you see how you limit your potential result there?

@popovacianen
3 days ago
BAGPIPES FOR THE WHITE MAN ;(

Kevin
3 days ago
regionalism works

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Culture isn’t supposed to be inclusive

@Esau
3 days ago
We need INTENTIONAL White communities like what Eric Aarvol is doing in the USA

Reclaim
3 days ago
no asian gfs

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
cringe

Kevin
3 days ago
Happy Saint Patrick’s day guys

@RonP1
3 days ago
That’s the end of his families ancestry

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
you stop paying them too, retardo

@popovacianen
3 days ago
lmao

@glider
3 days ago
depressing visual

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Chris
I’ve met some amazing people during my travels. they had no intentions of coming to the west. they were proud of their nations.

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
then stop paying them

Kevin
3 days ago
We probably could deal with other non White countries better than Shomrim squad policing the world killing innocents

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@haraldr1984
nope. they have been paid to invade our countries.

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
and not every practical alliance is entirely peaceful surrounding the goal

@Esau
3 days ago
I have a bag-pipe of sorts…

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
there’s a difference?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
highland games

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@LottaSense
they will. They fled their countries instead of fighting.

Brosey
3 days ago
too tolerant, too kind, always capitulating

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we can have GREAT relations with non white people IF they remain IN their own countries

@Clyde
3 days ago
not while they occupy our lands – I’ll support them in their lands

@Chris
3 days ago
I am not opposed either to working with non-whites, i will work with them, when they want to leave my country!

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Even after victory, Whites will still have to live in the world, and deal with other nations.

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need it so nonwhites can’t have children whenever they want

Kevin
3 days ago
drew pavlou the Turk

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
We aren’t including nons in our movement, he’s saying that if they understand what we are doing then they are less likely to come into conflict with us.

@Esau
3 days ago
lol the Negroes can fight on the frontlines against ZOG

Brosey
3 days ago
*concern

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed, Mark

@Mitch
3 days ago
Joel spoke with a non white guy half Lebanese

Brosey
3 days ago

@LottaSense
certainly my only concen

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
This micro nationalism wont stand a chance against america and china

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
100%

@LottaSense
3 days ago
OUR homogeneous society is the only thing that matters

Kevin
3 days ago
Kanye made himself look ridiculous

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
all white..no non whites

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
white pro movement will only work i

Blankeon
3 days ago
Only good thing about Kanye talking about NS is making the normie masses more interested in the subject and normalizing it.

JokerWaffen
3 days ago
o/

Kevin
3 days ago
Dr Duke is great too

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Is is good NS boy. I’ve met and drunk with him

collatz
3 days ago
[revving noises]

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Still does

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
yeah

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Brutusch
he benefited handsomely off the hollywood system.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
oh here comes the race cucking

Kevin
3 days ago
Heil

Callaghan
3 days ago

@Teamfield
0/

Kevin
3 days ago
o/

@AWIVR

AWIVR
3 days ago
\o

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Safe White & Clean

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Police you didn’t hear that

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Kanyes idiocy does nothing to promote nationalism

@LottaSense
3 days ago
PHYSICAL FIGHTERS

Kevin
3 days ago
o/ hey brother

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Poland safe too!98% safe..Japan 98% White..

AWIVR
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Political Soldiers

@Daniel
3 days ago
Love this guy

AZRIZZLER
3 days ago
#starfieldteam

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
they aren’t hurting enough

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
don’t they have polar bears?

Kevin
3 days ago
Only thing I disagreed with Joel was kanye , agree to disagree

@01123581379
3 days ago
Eugenics is the answer

Callaghan
3 days ago
Iceland is the safest country=No diversity

BobMatthews
3 days ago
you see it so much here in the US as well with these suburban normies with these McMansion generic shitty houses..Just relegating to vapid consumerism and materialism..No racial conscience

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews who run public schools have already trained a couple generations to “use their words” instead of fighting physically

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
14

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
GET TRIBAL White man!Or D.I.E.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
^^

Kevin
3 days ago
Tom Blair and Joel are the best of Starfield Nationalism

@popovacianen
3 days ago
i think joel is 1488 lol

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need to sterilize all non whites

Blankeon
3 days ago
Democracy is a fundamentally dishonorable system that rewards dishonorable, lying scum politicians

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Its a question of LEARNING TO BECOME TRIBAL!!!

@Chris
3 days ago
I 100% agree with Joel, we need a movement, that makes the people drunk, drunk from the will to live, drunk from the will to assert dominance…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for JOEL

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel hits the nail on the head

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Whites are too scared and too altruistic and nice to other races that wanna kill us!

@Esau
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Yup, Hate Speech laws in Canada were created by the (((Cohen Commission))).

Kevin
3 days ago
#FreeSam

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
true it is all about White people

Kevin
3 days ago
#FreeCharlie

Kevin
3 days ago
Language laws are Jewish

@RonP1
3 days ago
They own the system, we’re in an awful position, most are more interested in watching the gogglebox

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Whites are the problem

@popovacianen
3 days ago
oh shit joel is pissed lol

AZRIZZLER
3 days ago
starfieldian lives matter

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
White race a bunch of pussies. Amen

Kevin
3 days ago
No more brother wars

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Drunkards and pot heads are also a problem

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I continue to be very impressed with Joel

Son of Mars
3 days ago
This will essentially turn into irregular warfare of sorts, the establishment will try to kill those who upset their order. It’s good to know that going in and be ready to face possible death for survival and glory.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
JOEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin
3 days ago
the enemy are scared

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
AMEN!White race are pussies. Tough facts

@LottaSense
3 days ago
conditioned and brainpoisoned to be pussies

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
old population

Kent
3 days ago
remember #BANTHEADL? neither does anyone else

Kevin
3 days ago
would be proto-Starfield

@popovacianen
3 days ago
NO WEAK CUNTS ALLOWED ;(

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@fishandsoil
that’s debatable

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
agree with Joel on this too

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
yes as White ONLY care about Whites…and we need to demand WHITE UNITY

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
#Starfieldianlivesmatter

@01123581379
3 days ago
Don’t be LOW T

Kevin
3 days ago
flag has stars so we called it Starfield

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel is totally right on this

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
but they take our first names and won’t stop coming into our lands. crazy

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
RISE

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@LottaSense
This

Kevin
3 days ago
inside joke

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@AWIVR
the starfieldians are better when they slur

BobMatthews
3 days ago
complacency and escapism

Kevin
3 days ago
Australia = Starfield btw

Kent
3 days ago
done scare the slags

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need a standing army

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Teamfield
.I dont think that guy has barely anymore than 3 viewers on odysee anymore. Not even certain if he is pro-White anymore…

@Chris
3 days ago
Women get hot and bothered by strength!!! if you project strength, the gardening tools will follow suit!

Kevin
3 days ago
ghetto greg

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
lol, I like that mark was so taken back by that. I respect that bants

@Esau
3 days ago
Where dem White hoes at, shieet. Muh dick

@LottaSense
3 days ago
marks correct on that

collatz
3 days ago
skims the slags

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
the wimin mark

@Esau
3 days ago
None of us really have all the answers on how to reclaim White nations this side of WW2, so why not try everything and just don’t counter-signal other White nationalists?

Blankeon
3 days ago
Im with Justin Barret & Joel Davis on this issue. Our problems can only be solved with radical politics such as National Socialism. Democracy creates weak people who cannot solve difficult problems like mass immigration.

@RonP1
3 days ago
They have the tools to stop Nationalists getting anywhere near their system, therein lies the problem

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Joel calling out REACTIONARIES. Top man

AWIVR
3 days ago
at least he’s not slurring

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
I’ve never heard an Australian make a good argument

@popovacianen
3 days ago
NO HOES ALLOWED ;(

Matt Hammond
3 days ago
Another Partridge moment

Kevin
3 days ago
gangster Gregory innit m8

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
WN basically communicates in Ebonics

Kevin
3 days ago
Martinez got that from Bjerknes … the “ Hitler was jewish “ guy

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Maldric
I’d agree..Noble to fight but when its just at the expense of inevitable demise it doesnt bode well…

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Teamfield
it’s very hard for me, Whites around here are disagreeable ‘class conscious

AWIVR
3 days ago

@Kent
get

@countercurrents
on the show

@Esau
3 days ago
Oh no, is Keith parroting Brandon Martinez’s takes that Hitler was anti-White?! hahaha WTF

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
oh hey Mark

Kevin
3 days ago
PA has great optics and people attacked Mark over “Book gate” ? This reminds me of the bulldogs who attack Mark

@RonP1
3 days ago
Read Colin Jordan’s 1962 Trafalgar Square speech, tells us everything we need to know about the situation we are in

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago

@Esau
Possibly. Obviously I don’t know for sure. I find it suspicious they were allowed to register with the Zionist controlled electoral commission and they forbid discussion of the JQ (party policy)

Kevin
3 days ago
community building offline is the way

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
haha, Mark learned something today.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao mark

Kevin
3 days ago
Garden hoes ?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
I still say THIRD POSITION is a better label.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
the women

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Advocacy for people of European heritage includes by any means necessary

Kevin
3 days ago
o/

@WhiteBracer

collatz
3 days ago
lol dammit bracer

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Starfield team o/

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago
*pricks, who love to attack others… and many cucked libtards & cucked husbands

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
^^^

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
so keep up the ball paddling

@Kent

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Ukraine is a lost cause, anyone saying otherwise is very badly mistaken

Kevin
3 days ago
Colin Liddell is also a giant Azov shill , odd isn’t it

@Kent

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Esau
buy XRP, lol

Kent
3 days ago

@Teamfield
nothing much. just here to remind

@countercurrents
that Ukraine is a jewish controlled patsy of Jewish controlled America AND THEY LOST

Kevin
3 days ago

@Question_Everything_mCtH_
100%

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@RonP1
3 days ago
Le Penn is part of the club

@Esau
3 days ago
Whites are heavily conscientious and oriented towards Moral Communities, therefore we need to make a MORAL case for White nationalism IMO…but we also need MONEY behind us.

collatz
3 days ago
he’ll yeah borther

Kevin
3 days ago
aye up mate

@Kent

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
good to see all the boys

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Whisper campaign, influencing friends, & family, & also having 0 tolerance for people who are antiwhite would absolutely would positively reverberate

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Kent
o/

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
o/ muppet gang gang

Kent
3 days ago
and if you would understand

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
I’m surprised to hear this about Homeland, too. What’s going on there?

Kevin
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@AWIVR
o/

@Esau
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Wait, what? You think Homeland is funded by Shlomo?!

collatz
3 days ago

@AWIVR
you should strike up a conversation w/ Greg. I feel like you could get him talking

collatz
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

AWIVR
3 days ago
we’re all counting on you

@lotharcollatz

@RonP1
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Bingo

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
keep up the good fight king

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is 100% correct

Kevin
3 days ago
the man on the street will do something eventually , people don’t like the Jewish invaders , peasant antisemitism or shabbos NRx clout chaser

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Is a Republican boomer. He can’t be anything else. It’s what he is.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Neutering yourself for muskscraps

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
& NPCs are default antiwhite, severity depends on their political affiliation

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
You can still use Odysee at the moment mate!

@RonP1
3 days ago
The problem controls the Media and edjewcation system, therein lies the problem

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@popovacianen
I don’t know, I don’t think so, I can accept superchats on Odysee or Entropy!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Debate him -and lose, like you did with Mark

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@countercurrents
he said that they will follow who ever in power dont twist his words

collatz
3 days ago

@countercurrents
sounds like his argument is basically an order-of-operations one

@Glen19
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Yes. Kind of contradictory

@Chris
3 days ago
ethnocentrism is a part of conformity… the will to survive and to live and the chances are greater, if you align with people who look like you and thats a simple truth of nature.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Most folk are NPCs

Kevin
3 days ago
Odysee got nuked by NNR & other ppl fighting flagging each other

Counter-Currents
3 days ago
Why is Joel appealing to “the average guy in the street” when he earlier said that the masses are not persuadable?

@popovacianen
3 days ago
oh thanks

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
No you have to use entropy
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

0KT0BER
3 days ago
odysee arein the midst of changing payment processor

Kevin
3 days ago
Rogan guests like Theo Von & Jake Shields are good for normies

@Chris
3 days ago

@Esau
yeah, just take a look at their girlfriends, wives and children, 80-90% are white and white.

@popovacianen
3 days ago
wait is mark demonitazed on odysee?

collatz
3 days ago

@countercurrents
“many liberals” vs. “conservatives [implicitly all]” careful language, but while this is a popular idea, I’ve yet to see anyone try to establish it in the same sense LAC does Rogan’s guest’s composition

@Glen19
3 days ago
We can’t donate on Odyssey anymore?

@MarkCollett

Kevin
3 days ago
o/ Mark o/ Joel

BobMatthews
3 days ago
without any intention for offense, Mark could greatly benefit from a value oriented microphone like a Rode NT mini usb…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
that is just ridicolous

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
because communism won the war and participated to the creation of the new world order , the far left is accepted

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Guys, we only have three questions tonight over on Entropy! If anyone wants to ask a question, please do so, as I will be asking them soon!

Kevin
3 days ago
Bulldog nationalists in Ireland ? idk ?

@Esau
3 days ago
Most Whites – even leftist Whites – are demonstrably IMPLICITLY ethnocentric i.e., they “vote with their feet” e.g., living in gated White communities….we need to get Whites to be EXPLICITLY ethnocentrism.

@Chris
3 days ago
Hitlers goal was to unify the left and right, because in reality, there is no difference between a communist german and a conservative german, a protestant or catholic german.

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Boris Johnson was called a Nazi

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
MUh Naertsee

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@popovacianen
right but it is reasonable to think tha they are like eighties western Nationalists

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith using the most AstroTurfed “banned man in America” Fuentes is a joke when he flew to UK to meet an Irishman ?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
desensitization.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@popovacianen
Joel says you need to be racist to be successful but I don’t see how yelling racial slurs at people will bring you to victory

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
National Socialists recruited germans from the left and the right… there wasn’t a specific targeted group, thats the first time i hear that one.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Spot on Mark. The movement destroyed the power of the term nazi. Now isn’t the time to fret over it. It’s a strange thing.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Keith just wants to be an E-celeb

@Glen19
3 days ago

@popovacianen
Yelling racial slurs and waving the Japanese imperial flag and sometimes the Nazi flag doesn’t really appeal to anyone. maybe I’m mistaken and it will eventually work but I think not

@vengeance
3 days ago
what the fug

Kent
3 days ago
we just need to get trump to tweet gamergate

@Chris
3 days ago
I am ethnic german and i can say that with certainty and confidence, because ive read all the books, from Hitlers Mein Kampf, his second book, which is sus, to Alfred Rosenberg to all the spergs from the conservative revolutionary movement in the times of the weimar republic.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Chris
Rosenberg’s “Myth of the 20th Century” is one of the deepest books I’ve ever read in my life. I will definitely need to re-read it many more time.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Good question Mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
You have to begin the schooling and I think many of the German and Italian thinkers are necessary for this

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@Glen19
clown show as compared to who? western nationalists? lmao

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Son.of.Mars
always ask them:”Do you think Whites deserve a homeland”?when they say NO show them how that is antiwhite and wrong because all other races have their honelands already!

Brosey
3 days ago
optically

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The National Socialists actively recruited from communists, at Hitler’s insistence. Goebbels was a communist before he was a National Socialist.

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yeah i get it but why shit on japanese nationalists

@vengeance
3 days ago
yes i ca imagine that

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Are you living in a european nation and are planning to procreate with a white woman?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
I think Keith is blaming NS for the poor performance of the National Party in Irish politics. He is blaming the “spergs” who moved the Overton Window to the right in the first place. It’s a real shame.

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Esau
It’s a hard read

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Albanese is a worm

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Conservatives in all western nations exist to prevent actual nationalism from happening

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The Right is weak. A fkn failure by any objective measure.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
so was joel though right…

Brosey
3 days ago
what mark just described is exactly why NS will be rehabilitated

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I am sorry, there is hardly any “German Particularism” in National Socialsim…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The Left are REVOLUTIONARIES; the Right are REACTIONARIES

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hitlers supposed understanding of aryan hsitory is mainly a thing coming from Rosenberg, who studied aryan history and the influence and development of philosophy on the aryan soul throughout history.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Born in Egypt, bless his heart

Son of Mars
3 days ago
*if

@01123581379
3 days ago
End the Fed is the superior movement because that is what will help whites the most

@Glen19
3 days ago
Japanese nationalists are a clown show. They do things in a performative racist way and haven’t made much ground. Can’t even protest against Kurds in the country

Son of Mars
3 days ago
NS is easy to like and convert to of you don’t want your people to die off/subjugated

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Even Peter Hitchens knows Britain’s involvement in the war was a disaster.

Reclaim
3 days ago
the red bull putsch

@Chris
3 days ago
National Socialism is a amalgamation of all the european thinkers and philosophers who based their ideas in reality.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
true

Kevin
3 days ago
maybe Keith wants to be Irish Fuentes ?

@Chris
3 days ago

@LottaSense
nonsense, National Socialism wasn’t a specific german thing, if you take a look at all the influences all the german thinkers had… Henry Ford played a formative influence on National Socialism, the friggin race laws were based on the Jim Crow Laws.

@Esau
3 days ago
Globalism stems from the Tanakh

@Esau
3 days ago
(((Globalism)))

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
I have heard about it but I haven’t read it

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
just spread prowhiteism you do it your way..as long as its spreading prowhiteism I dont care what you do..Ive made 100s of whites become prowhite just by talking in my community…it starts in your home..and your closest friends..when we are all prowhites its game over for the antiwhites

@LottaSense
3 days ago
seethe dummy

@Esau
3 days ago
If we don’t get some big wins under our collective belt, I predict ZOG will start locking us White waycists in mental asylums. Psychiatry is very jewish, stemming mostly from the American Psychiatric Association.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
The comment sections in those AI-translated Hitler speeches are very positive.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Rudolf Hess was NS personified.

Reclaim
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Chris
The question of German particularism is an important one because it stems from Hitler’s own view of Aryan history and the place of Germany in it. It’s something that’s easily resolved in a good faith discussion.

@tuer
3 days ago
20 x hasbara budget

@01123581379
3 days ago
The label isn’t what matters what matters is ending the private central JEW bank forever

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
just spread prowhiteism Chris…and find the best technique for recruiting whites to become prowhite..then when one of us are in power we use that power to steer the ship in a prowhite way…this is how it works

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReclaimYourNeighborhood
lol

@Glen19
3 days ago
Nothing wrong with universalism to a degree. Funny how those who say nationalism for everyone don’t include Palestinians for some reason

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is doing Civic antisemitism / Kosher anti Zionism which eventually will lead to CivNat / Civic Fascism. Why he chooses to go backwards ? who knows

@LottaSense
3 days ago
too bad it was not a pan-European movement. It was a pan-Germanism movement. Nothing wrong with that, but it was murdered in its crib before it became pan-European.

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
The book is called “Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition”. Chapter 8.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The spiritual question is a central one. The current zeitgeist requires a measure of spiritual thinking, and dare I say – mysticism. Materialism and objectivism do nothing for the soul.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
We had our own version here, the likes of Henry Hamilton Beamish and Arnold Leese would have come down on the small hats 10x harder if they ever got in power.

@Chris
3 days ago
with the former Group you build the worldview, the ideas ect. the foundation of your group and the letter is the meat of the group. the whole Head and body concept of the folk.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I disagree with MacDonald that Whites are individualistic. Ukrainians in Japan & Taiwan have their own ethnic advocacy group. French in Singapore seem pretty collectivist in their neighborhood.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
sounds interesting

@Glen19
3 days ago
Can’t ignore the Nazi accuastion and the holocaust if you are a nationalist in the West. Doesn’t mean you need the copy the political platform of the NSDAP exactly. You can have a new political ideology that works for whatever situation you are in.

@Chris
3 days ago
Then you need to project strength and you do that by having a vanguard, a sort of drone squad of people who aren’t as steadfast in their worldview but are willing to do the fighting for the group.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
There was far more history to NS than just the putsch, Joel

@Esau
3 days ago
IMO Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s latest book on Western psychology is a GREAT resource to strategizing how to win over Whites.

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
the issue is still the same though, you try to go the hard way, by red pilling every normie on a individual basis… you will spend eternity until you get enough people to be on your side, which is not feasible. You need a handful intellectuals who are steadfast in their WV.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Turning against National Socialism is rather like denying that you’re racist – you’re losing the argument and accepting the premises of the enemy.

rex
3 days ago
” white new deal ” ” four natural freedoms ”

@01123581379
3 days ago
The swatztika is ETERNAL

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Lol yes. I can grow a thicker beard than most Chinamen.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Yagoda
Dear Christian Brother we have that discussion another place

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Spot on Joel

@RonP1
3 days ago
Drop ‘the nazis’ Jew propaganda term

@Esau
3 days ago

@Glen19
My point still stands. As long as you aren’t in White countries.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I live in Japan.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Glen19

@ArabSocialNationalist
I respect Chinese and Arabs…if they stay the hell in China and the ME…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Glen19
That must mean you can grow a beard!

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I haven’t disagreed with Joel about anything yet. Can anyone prove him wrong?

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
yes! yes! yes!

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I’m actually part Hui. This DNA test I got from China has me having some Iranian & Central Asian dna. It doesn’t matter to me because I don’t think ethnicity is soley based on genetics. Although it is a factor you can’t ignore.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The puritan, I’m-smarter-than-you element in the Movement has always been a problem. Tea and biscuits and long words won’t cut it.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Colin Jordan – A prime example of a NS

@LottaSense
3 days ago
they don’t hate jewsus

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
some of us Canadians of Irish and Scottish heritage have not entirely forgotten where we came from

@01123581379
3 days ago
Rockefellers wanted the mass immigration to punk us into world government. Kakala winning would have made it possible for sure. We dodged a bullet.

Brosey
3 days ago
re what joel is saying, the patrick bateman memes were funny for a time but i personally am tired of them

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
rooting for the underdog is rooting for nons pre 1945

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago
Alcohol has also been a poison to the movement and there are also too many dude weed bros as well

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews use biological weapons aka blacks and browns to kill White countries

@Chris
3 days ago
this is also the issue normies have, they repeat what their group says, without really believing it, which is where cognitive dissonance kicks in.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
prowhite means you put whites first..you fight antiwhites and fight for pro white policies..you upkeep prowhiteism in everything you do…when we all boycot coca cola it will work etc

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
but who let them in ?

@Esau
3 days ago
lol the “Synagogue of Satan” verses in Revelations is not saying what based Christians think it says. Adam Green laid that interpretation to rest.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Hispanics killed America

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
long live the underdog

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed, Joel

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
wouldn’t you agree that there is a difference between what a person says and what a person beliefs? again, conformity being the issue, i wouldn’t put my trust in a person who just repeats, belief is a process of self realization.

@01123581379
3 days ago
I would say browns

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews are nig nogs

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
the jews

@LottaSense
3 days ago
both

rex
3 days ago
tradies

@01123581379
3 days ago
who hurts prowhiteness the most blacks or browns?

@RonP1
3 days ago
“According to one former Brownshirt, 132 Nazis had been killed and 18 thousand injured by the end of 1932
and a further 68 killed in January 1933, at the end of which Hitler was appointed Chancellor!.”

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
exactly

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
And a broad land which lends itself to the pioneer mindset

collatz
3 days ago
There’s a difference b/t a ragtag group of well-motivated supporters….and boneface

@LottaSense
3 days ago
(some of chat, not the host or guest)

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we dont need a spaceship..we just need to keep prowhiting..then the more prowhites we become evetually it will be too.many prowhites to ignore and the people will only allow prowhite leaders…thats how a prowhite will come to power..people selected him for being pro white/pro Germany only

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
what do you mean by making someone pro-white? make other people repeat what you are saying?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
gayyyyyy

@01123581379
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
stating facts isn’t infighting

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
Please no religious infighting

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NSDAP started with the DAP. Gregor Strasser was there first. Hitlerites don’t like that fact

@RonP1
3 days ago
Jews are behind these thug looking characters, that people are led to believe are National Socialists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The SA, the working class are crucial to any nationalist movement. You can’t be middle class about things. Hitler defended those lads for exactly that reason. Snobbery is poison to nationalism.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
Im prowhite…you are prowhite..a prowhite person made you prowhite correct?so keep prowhiting..Ive made so many whites prowhite and keep doing so…we grow organically worldwide…eventually we are too many to be stopped

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Esau
Half brown -like the NSDAP’s SS 13th division

@01123581379
3 days ago
NatSocs falsely believe that Hitler was spontaneous when in reality he was allowed to leave Rothschild central bank to create the WWII narrative.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
I would be a citizen of the Reich, per the Nuremberg laws.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark is sending for Blood Tribe

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Yep, we’re in a terrible situation

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
degenerates

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
so you will shame them, while the bigger group, the one they belong to, are shaming you for being a racist ect…

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Joel, you’re a Christian mate…the Bible tells us God’s kingdom is gonna fix everything…we pray for it in the Lords prayer mate …we pray for God’s kingdom to come not for man’s mate

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
I got made on the train reading a book about Strasser. Someone googled it, then started asking me why I was interested in nohtzees

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
So you are half brown?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We band of brothers, we happy few

@Glen19
3 days ago
I am Chinese.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I assume he is Arab based on his name lol

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago
We do need to drop the red braces, boots and general neo nazi aesthetics imo and cultivate clean aesthetics with physically fit and clean cut people in out movement

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
you entertaining empty calories, it does nothing, it did nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
I’m half English half Arab. Not that Arabs are a race as such.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
We will make it popular to be prowhite

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anyone uncomfortable with Joel’s position should think themselves lucky that Strasserite

@ArabSocialNationalist
is not speaking :grinning:

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
we will keep exposing antiwhiteism until all Whites eho don’t join the fight will be called self hating whites…we make it shame to not be pro white

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Perhaps you didn’t see my question the first time. What race are you?

@Chris
3 days ago
like i pointed out, Conformity is our biggest issue that we have to deal with… hitler wrote about it himself, he red pilled his normie friends just for them to come back with the old programming and arguments.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Where would Jonathan Bowden be on this issue, I wonder?

@Chris
3 days ago
the mass doesn’t care about facts.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Romantic is a key word. You need romanticism and the subjective. The crisis of modernity is rooted in materialism, and materialism has to be fought head on.

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
then what? we tried that for how long? it doesn’t work like that.

@RonP1
3 days ago
They wouldn’t allow a genuine party anywhere near Their system

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Joel’s position; 13 for Woods’

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
What race are you?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Pandering to the lowest common denominator desires of voters is contrary to the fundamental NS views
of leadership – which are based on natural law and the proof of history.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I also agree with Joel

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel incredible based as always

@Chris
3 days ago
I 100% agree with Joel, thats the only way how its done.

@01123581379
3 days ago
It took a lot of brain power to invent rubber dildos that’s Chosen Power

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Along with you, I’m now banned from Twitter. Said nothing bad. Just started calling out Farage

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
The Holocaust is used to discredit nationalism. If you are going to be fighting for repatriation & laws protecting a demographic majority. You will start running up against the Holocaust blood libel.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
real af

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
We are going to be called Nazis and racists anyway

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need a central bank that is run by congress with term limits

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
14

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we get that by exposing and pointing out antwhiteism and with the persecution against our people in focus

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Does the community approach NSN in the street? Or are they afraid?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Of course. They’re moving agianst ethnonationalism across the board. Panic.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
For sure. The question is how much they are lying by…….

@BritishGammon
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
They were INVITED to rebuild Britain, apparently – lol

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Yeah, they obviously give out BS figures so people think things aren’t as bad as they are

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Jeew tycoons expect the Dildo market to reach 62 billion$ per anum by 2030.

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
London is definitely less than 30% White British

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The crisis of modernity has its basis in the foundational lie of WWII. You can’t liberate people’s minds until you smash the WWII myth entirely.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
agreed

@Mitch
3 days ago
2035 not 2066

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
britain started when david lammys parents came to Britain, apparently

@RonP1
3 days ago
There’s next to no Brits left in areas like Tottenham

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Nationalists need to think about what can be salvaged from the ashes. There’s no saving the situation with votes.

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Insane how it got this far.

@Esau
3 days ago

@haraldr1984
Yup. Too many Whites think the jews are primarily anti-Christian…NO, they are anti-White. In fact, jews hate White heathenry more than White Christians, but I digress…

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Use a Schmidt photo instead

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’ll be sooner than that. The rate of settlement of migrants is positively frantic.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@ssanwaerter
have a good day at work o/

Callaghan
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
yeah 0/

@ssanwaerter
3 days ago
Ahh i gotta go to work soon but i’ll watch the replay later. Great stream so far lads.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Use the Celtic Cross. Nat symbol since day 1

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Yagoda
yeah they like to show them off taking pictures, so they buy fancy ones to flex

@Esau
3 days ago
Greetings, folks! o/

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
National Socialism is a set of natural laws which are given a name. It’s not an invention of Hitler per se, it is the codification of a set of natural laws and a programme for their renewed implementation.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Again I ask, why the opposite opinion to the Trad Workers you were heavily involved in? You had some epiphany?

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Yagoda
thats because anything can be a dildo if you’re brave enough

@Glen19
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Ireland has a rich nationalist history and it is very recent. Not to mention it wasn’t liberal

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
cuck box broke nobody cares what you have to say lol

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Trump lacks the Balls to ban Dildos, much less to ban Pornography.

@Chris
3 days ago
think about Martin Luther, when the church threatened to ban him and he said “Ich stehe hier. Ich kann nicht anders.” or think about socrates who said that he can’t do anything else but tell the truth, even when faced and threatened with death.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Each time you get up, you need to reflect on how you got knocked down last time and change up your fight.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@CosmicPepe
I use the word assimilation differently. Like how the Ainu were assimilated. They were made to intermarry Japanese, language was banned, etc. Essentially an ethnocide.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Why would an Irish Nationalist adopt a German history hobby project? It makes no sense. His tradition predates German NS by centuries, and has been far more successful, by any measure.

@Chris
3 days ago
There are 2 types of people, people who are unstable and people who stick to the simple truth no matter what. I see this here in germany literally every friggin day, politician who were thought to be principled break and bend… and it is simply because of the other type of person is a rarity.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
It’s not just about the baggage of decades of brainwashing and slander. Even NSDAP in its best possible light was not for export, and was ethnically and historically contingent.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
So you now call out Warren and Striker?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
There were a lot of Strasserists knocking about the BNP, to be fair.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Apparently most Perverts prefer to purchase dildos imported from Asia.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@RonP1
deport nons first

@RonP1
3 days ago
It’s really not that difficult, one of the first things you would do is crack down on Secret Societies

@Chris
3 days ago
Hitler said it in his speech “We shall not lie, we shall not con.”

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Uncle DID NOT invent NS

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
TradWorker was for Faith, Family, and Folk. It was smeared as a neonazi hitler hobby project.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
yeah, try it again. The more you do tests and poke around the sooner you’ll get it dialed in

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Leonidas died in thermopylae, did that mean the greeks should’ve given up? Fall down six times, stand up seven.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Keith and co cannot accept the terrible truth – there is no parliamentary or democratic answer to the crisis of modernity and the Jewish Problem. NS is needed because it is fundamentally revolutionary, and that is why it is needed. You cannot use the system to defeat itself. The system must go.

@Chris
3 days ago
Well, Keith got corrupted by popularity and the ability to make money with the movement and the moment you try to make money with the movement, the entire revolutionary spirit is gone.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
You have to assimilate if you come to a new country. If you can’t assimilate, don’t come.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Hey, Grok. Did the NSDAP defeat jewish globalism?

@Glen19
3 days ago
Every State that is multiethnic will have minority rights for political stability. It has nothing to do with liberalism. Its that or forced assimiliiation.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
I suspect Keith is bitter because of the poor showing of the National Party in the Irish elections. Perhaps he’s blaming NS for turning off the masses. He’d be wrong, but perhaps that’s what’s underlying his bitterness.

@RonP1
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
LOL

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@Son.of.Mars
Exactly, I think that liberalism is a big wrong turn the West took a while ago, and now we need to right it.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
yes, who would die for King Charles ?

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
I don’t want my country to turn into pajeetistan 2.0

Long Knife
3 days ago
Answer: only with a better idea

@Chris
3 days ago
People like Keith try to appease the masses, while the masses look for a strong leader… basically, Keith is soy, while the masses want bloody meat!

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
Appreciate being in chat with fellow nationists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
A lot of nationalists would do well to look at Rosenberg. NS is not just a chauvinistic reward for being Aryan – it’s a programme of restoration of something that was lost a long time ago. It’s boldness and depth are often ignored.

Long Knife
3 days ago
a better question: Can National Socialism be killed ?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
we took a wrong turn, and ended up somewhere we don’t want to be, we have to look back where we went wrong.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
“For King And Country” – Imagine coming out with that now.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
So called infighting is merely sparring and good training.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
You’re right to call out reactionaries. Anyone who is not revolutionary at this point is living in the 1800s

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
yeah Cali 480p, don’t ask me how

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@Chris
all true mate

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
i might change the bitrate and try after…

@Chris
3 days ago
There is a simple answer to this… reality hasn’t changed since then… the enemy is the same, the issues are the same, ect.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
In a Europe where Christianity has collapsed, NS is needed also because it has a spiritual dimension, which people desperately need.

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Callahan may I call in??

@RonP1
3 days ago
Democracy is the jew tool no matter what name the party goes under – end of story

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Is not this, your position, antithetical to the Trad Workers?

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@daniel
No, they spoke with Justice Actions usually.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
you gonna do a test stream today?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
NS is extremely attractive if communicated properly

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Warren, Greg Conte etc., have been steadfast on this.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Joel just explained that the S in NS is some intellectualized bullshit that’s not Socialist or even “Social” in the common sense. And now he’s dumping schmittian and hegelian dialectical word salad. His brain’s totally fried on germanophile bullshit.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NS is still relevant: Third Posirionism. The TRad Workers, Striker, Warren, get that much

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
To attack – at this moment – a nationalist movement that puts socialism front and centre is very suspicious indeed. Can reactionary nationalists really be called nationalists at all?

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
pat was being facetious

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Let Joel cook man

@Daniel
3 days ago
Truth You know any decent reading material on the Klan?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@vettekid407
Pat Bateman told me Lil Sheckel ia alive and well…

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
I mean once..we only need divide our social space once!Prowhite vs Antiwhite. This is how we finally can unite instead of dumb infighting

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
gtsy

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
\o

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Unlike Irish and Italian mafias who fraternized with Jeews, the KKlan did noble things for White people.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
About time this issue was addressed. Look where cowering, playing by the System’s rules has got us

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
I was just listening to some old Gas Station streams… brought back fond memories

Callaghan
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
0/

@Glen19
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Which makes it different. The Indigenous Taiwanese have special privileges like they can own firearms for hunting for example but they don’t have more rights than the Han majority.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
National Socialism should also be understood as a programme of improvement and restoration which would logically render itself unnecessary, which is what Hitler foresaw for the NSDAP.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Starmer told Trump that UK has free speech

Callaghan
3 days ago

@vettekid407
Iheard hes still alive…

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Only divide our social space twice: Prowhites vs. Antiwhites. You prowhite you are on TEAM WHITE

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
R.I.P Lil Shekel

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
The minorities there have separate autonomous republics. China has a similiar thing. Enhe is a autonomous region for the Russians for example.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Race 1st

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
but in the west the minorities have more rights than the majority

@01123581379
3 days ago
“Democracy means run by Jews” – Ezra Pound

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Glen19
I believe the Russian constitution recognises the Russian state as the ethnic expression of the Russian people, minority rights notwithstanding.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

@Glen19
3 days ago
That being said. Multiethnic States always have a dominant ethnic group. Tajiks, Russians and other minorities still have rights and even privileges but the Han is the dominant ethnic group

@RonP1
3 days ago
I find people try to complicate our situation to confuse people, it’s all pretty simple stuff

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
We need a White ADL to protect our people from antiwhiteism..just like jews do for antisemitism

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
It’s a ball and cup game where Joel pretends that Neonazism is just “nationalism purified.” It is not, and the historically and ethnically contingent elements of the NSDAP are inextricably tangled up in NS and its contemporary Neonazi tribute band.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Nazi……We don’t use that term

@Glen19
3 days ago
The Nation State is a European idea. Most States in the world aren’t nation States. Russia is a multinational State. China is a State of the 56 ethnicities that are recognized in the constitution. Iran is not a nation state and is multiethnic.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
With the mass immigration now going on Racial-Fascism/NS is the only way

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
as boomer. My friends all were into materialism and comforts of money. Nobody was interested back then in comfortable quality of life. Meaning and truth was not as inportant as a strong economy. If a man does not care about meaning of life. Its it mate. Community building is best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Breaking the lies about National Socialism is crucial to reverse the intellectual damage done to the West in the post WWII period.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we need White Unity worldwide period…or else we will be crushed even more

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Yagoda
agreed

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
If I was an employer I would be embarrassed to pay a brother less than a living wage. Many can’t afford a dependable vehicle and housing simultaneously.

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Greg admitted he’s a liberal

@Daniel
3 days ago
NSN is epic

@Daniel
3 days ago
Pushing NS also frees up space in the wake of it for other groups which are less hardline

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Greg Johnson is a republican. His ideology is post-war boomerism with a bit of racial awareness

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
joel please show us your tattoos

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
That is not the circle Keith surrounds himself with…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
NS is a threat also because it is fundamentally revolutionary, and it questions the fundaments of modern spirituality and society at the root. That is why it’s dangerous.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
I need that pro white turban

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
thats a pro white turban..when an antiwhite touch that turban the amtiwhite turn into dust

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
100%

@RonP1
3 days ago
Most Brits are so thick they don’t even know what each ideology stands for, someone tried telling me Hitler was against Socialists not Leftists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Conservatism is deeply materialist, and it feels threatened by the non-materialism of NS.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
His timing is very odd, especially given the progress that has been made in recent years when it comes to revising the lies about WWII

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
lol, true

@Daniel
3 days ago
Joel looks like he’s wearing a turban

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Churchill: the best Prime Minister Shekels could buy

@DragonFox
3 days ago
o/

RacismIsNatural
3 days ago
In the long term this will come back to bite Keith

@Daniel
3 days ago
Ahoy there Chief

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Chief_Moody
evening Chief

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Evening troops

@VikingBro
3 days ago
Joel, Tom, Blair and Hersant etc, Our Guys, the Aryan Thunder from Down Under

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
When your oppressors are chronic liars I wouldn’t sweat any missinformation. I never say anything bad about the Axis Powers.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Joel is based and so is Tom, Jacob, Blair and all the NSN lads

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@GustavusVasa
lol

Gustavus Vasa
3 days ago
We all agree with Joel so no worries Mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
I hope not but it seems he is going down a wrong path

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Joel’s a great guy.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
People have been saying Keith has been off-key for a while now, I don’t want to start any drama but I ignored it up until this.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel’s a hero!Fighting antiwhiteism and not scared of showing his face while doing it!BIG RESPECT!

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Share this show on Twitter both Joel and Mark are banned!

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Exactly Ron, he’s a weirdo, he also simps for miscegenating prostitutes

@RonP1
3 days ago
Keith Woodstein

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago
Did Woods got compromised?

@RonP1
3 days ago
Why would you go down the road of trying to debunk Europa – very suspicious

RacismIsNatural
3 days ago
Keith just wants to be popular he wants to be liked by guys like Elon

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
youtube

@charlie
3 days ago
episode 8 us accurate

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I remember when Keith came on this week on the alt right with less than 1000 followers on toutube

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Keith Woods debunking of Europa is retarded . He can’t find something on google so he says it isn’t true

@Daniel
3 days ago
Credibility is everything

@Daniel
3 days ago
A lot of it is wrong

@Daniel
3 days ago
Guy who made Europa should have got his facts right though

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
o/

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel Davis is a hero for White Western Civilization!Thanks for fighting antiwhiteism Joel!!!

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Indeed so

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@RonP1
Yeah, Odysee always does that. Wish they’d fix bugs but they don’t.

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Mark and Joel o/

WP Combat
3 days ago
o/

@RonP1
3 days ago
Damn, I wondered why it hadn’t started….I had to press play!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
indeed I think this be good

Reclaim
3 days ago
beanie waffen

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Evening everyone

@dnhotd
3 days ago
startooo

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
log time brother

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The timing of these attacks on NS is very suspicious. Just at the moment when WWII revisionism is having an impact.

@VikingBro
3 days ago
\o

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
The ProDildo Trump grabs the masses by the crotch.

@Chris
3 days ago
Also, if you want to reach the men, you have to reach the women first… it is always the women who motivates the men to do something.

@Daniel
3 days ago
If Joel ever becomes dictator of Australia then I’m moving down under

@Mitch
3 days ago
Anyone living in London here?

MarcoEire
3 days ago
Evening men

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
o/

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
Hail!

DerCherusker
3 days ago
Hail!

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Good evening.

@Chris
3 days ago
You have to over dramatize, give them a emotional story.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
share the link

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
o7

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
0/

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
This better be based and redpilled! I’m skipping Pete Q for this! haha.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BlackwaterPark
\o

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hey! Long time no see.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I really like Keith, but I’m on team Joel for this one.

@Daniel
3 days ago
oy vey

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago
good evening

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)

@Mitch
I’m on the outskirts, M25 area

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Greetings goyim

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@Crusader1483
I’d love to see that.

MarcoEire
3 days ago
Has it started yet? says starting soon for me

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
Just asking because I am

BasedMan83
3 days ago
Joel and Keith should do a debate

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
Joel to reign as king of the united anglosphere by 2033

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Exiting, let’s goo

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Why?

MarcoEire
3 days ago
If any White nation gets a NS government I’ll move there.

@Chris
3 days ago
In my opinion we can’t just hit the masses with pure facts… we have to repackage it in emotional moving container… thats what hitler meant by the mass has a female quality to it, you only will move the masses if you grab them with emotions, you have to emotionally move them.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
NeoBolshevik Stalkers want to rape and murder people that don’t want to be near them.

@Chris
3 days ago
it is like chocolate, you can wrap it in any package you want, give it any shape you want, it will always stay chocolate at its core, thats what we have to do with national socialism, we have to repackage it.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Race is the basis of all true politics – our degenerate system is upside down and is attempting to bring about the mongrelisation of the British people

@Chris
3 days ago
Well you would have to elaborate what you mean by ns, because National Socialism is not just aesthetics, it is also aesthetics, but its not just the swastika, it is the thing that is underneath the swastika, the deeper meaning or truth that is ns.

@Daniel
3 days ago
We need to spam TikTok with as many NS videos as we can

@Chris
3 days ago

@eddiesdreaming
Well, thats the thing, we can’t change the problem, we have to deal with it, it is like having a crippled leg, you can’t change it, you have to work with it.

@Chris
3 days ago
that is also why hitler spent years of his life studying Communism and all of their tactics, in order to understand how they manipulate the masses and which tricks and oppositional methods he had to break through. We have to do the same, the enemy hasn’t changed , only the methods have.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
that sounds like quite a big problem to change

@Chris
3 days ago
Well, in my opinion, our biggest enemy is Conformity… Schopenhauer talks about it… the will to live and survive is so strong that it forces the masses into conformity, even if it means they are wrong… Hitler briefly talks about it too in his book, saying the mass has a female quality to it.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
honestly think we have to self segregate , from liberal whites ,they are dangerous

@WhiteZealot
3 days ago
Socialism must be paired with duties. All men must do at least 2 years in the military. If you’ve taken more from the state than you’ve given to it, you don’t get to vote or serve on a jury or hold office.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
tbh it could be our best hope of revival , god knows we need a general awakening like yesterday .

@RonP1
3 days ago
Anything has got to be better than this Judeo-Masonic Dictatorship in disguise, that goes by the name of Democracy

@Chris
3 days ago
National Socialism is based in reality and truth, it is not just some weird esoteric ideology that we try to force on to reality, to say “we can’t resurrect National Socialism” is like saying “let’s bury the truth and deny reality, because its not good optics to say race is real.”

@DragonFox
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
I’m two subs away from 1k, if you have time for a psychedelic music break:
Subliminal
Subliminal

@DragonFox: Subliminal
More

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I say yes

@Daniel
3 days ago
Heil Joel

ZoMoeVanMensenDieDeHeletijdHalveWaarhedenVerspreiden
3 days ago

@Johnny
Well, we should do that since Europe has more commies than Germany back then

@Johnny
3 days ago
the whole argument is so stupid. NO ONE is saying we should walk around in brown shirts doing Roman salutes. But if you cant see what Germany was up against and fought for and how that is still important today.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
Genetics

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
and a breeding programme

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
the main JD and the answer is of course it can , nothing else came close to what we need

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 days ago
We have the cure. Sieg Heil \o

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 days ago
Commies, jews, cuckservatives, democrats, liberals, trannies, pedos and all the other hedonistic degenerates fear
National Socialism because they know it would be game over in a NS state. Hence why NS is the most demonized ideology. Our modern world is sick and the symptoms are everywhere.

@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago
Reclaim Europa (and European-Founded nations: USA, Canada, Australia and NZ)

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
We need a billionaire to buy us a nazi island we can all live on together…

0
0

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 26,205

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4: Thu, Mar 27, 2025 — Transcript now completed = 152/152 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Updated Odysee comments (1629).

Version 3: Wed, Mar 26, 2025 — Transcript completed = 145/152 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 2: Tue, Mar 25, 2025 — Transcript completed = 89/152 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Mon, Mar 24, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 30/152 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee comments (1451).

Joel Davis – The Self-Imploding Legitimacy of Our Opposition, Why Are They So Afraid? – Feb 14, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:55:40 +0000

Joel Davis

The Self-Imploding Legitimacy of Our Opposition

Why Are They So Afraid?

Fri, Feb 14, 2025

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following:

Blair expresses frustration with the heat and living near noisy immigrant neighbors (~5:00):

“I hate summer. It seems so bright outside and being surrounded by Indians doesn’t help.”

Joel discusses recent “anti-semitic attacks” in Australia, suggesting they may be false flags (~10:00):

“Almost definitely what we’re seeing is that Israel is basically conducting false flag attacks against the Australian Jewish community ”

They criticize conservative commentators for refusing to debate them (~20:00):

“The only conceivable reason why they keep refusing to debate me is because they know that I’ll fucking win the debate and make them look retarded!”

Joel argues that White nationalism is a natural response to anti-White sentiment (~25:00):

“If there was a sort of community network or if the government was willing to tolerate some measure of White identity politics, then Nazi groups wouldn’t be growing ”

Blair expresses anger at the current social and political situation (~30:00):

“Sometimes I just don’t feel like talking and, I’m just angry.”

Joel criticizes civic nationalism as a “shallow ideology” (~40:00):

“It’s a shallow ideology which serves as a means for people who aren’t Australian for they can pretend that they’re Australian.”

They discuss the fear of consequences for speaking out (~45:00):

“Isn’t it scarier to live in silence and fear for the sake of some wage slave job than it is to experience some sort of, as they call it, consequence ”

Joel talks about the importance of sacrifice in nationalism (~50:00):

“Every nation is forged on the basis of sacrificial love.”

They discuss recent podcast appearances and upcoming projects (~55:00)

Blair mentions working on short videos reminiscent of “old school YouTube” (~60:00)

Joel discusses the challenge of censorship and the need for adaptation (~65:00):

“There’s always ways around censorship. There’s ways around all of the quote, unquote, “consequences ”

They criticize the current political system as rigged against White nationalists (~70:00):

“If we got the same treatment, if we were treated fairly the way everybody else is, the way everybody who’s not white is, then yeah, would be significantly more influential than we currently are.”

Joel expresses confidence in their ability to adapt and grow (~75:00):

“This year is going to be a year of adaptation.”

They read and respond to Superchat messages from viewers (~80:00 onwards)

Blair mentions feeling over stimulated when working on videos (~85:00):

“I seem to get like over stimulated and hyper focused on them when I’m working on them.”

Joel discusses the strategy of having supporters share clips of their content (~90:00):

“What we’re going to start doing in the future though is probably professionalizing.”

They end the stream with Blair apologizing for his mood (~95:00):

“Sorry I was in a bad mood, but, hey, hope I was entertaining.”

Throughout they express White nationalist views, criticize multiculturalism, and discuss strategies for promoting their ideology despite censorship and social consequences.

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/self-imploding-legitimacy:c

https://rumble.com/v6knhy1-the-self-imploding-legitimacy-of-our-opposition-why-are-they-so-afraid.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis

follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

https://x.com/joeldavisx

Published on Fri, Feb 14, 2025

Description

The self-imploding legitimacy of our opposition, why are they so afraid?
February 14, 2025
678 views
86
1
Support
Save
2 Reposts
Share
joeldavis
@joeldavis
4,659 followers
Join
Follow
my social media links:
https://bio.link/joeldavis
follow Blair on telegram:
https://t.me/realblaircottrell
follow Blair on twitter:
https://x.com/b_cottrell89
follow Tom on telegram:
https://t.me/thomas_sewell
follow Jacob on telegram:
https://t.me/jacobhersant
blair cottrell
hivemind
joel and blair
joel davis
national socialist network
File size
2.11 GB
Less
10
129 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 17,310 – Duration: 96 mins)

Joel Davis: Should be live. It is the 14th of December [February] 2025. It’s Valentine’s Day. But instead of spending the evening with a lucky lady, instead Blair Cottrell has decided to spend it with me. So, ain’t that something?

Blair Cottrell: I did notice a lot of couples out. I was at the gym before and it was, I suppose, wholesome, refreshing to see a lot of nice Australian couples going out for dinner on Valentine’s Day. You know, I’m one of those people who thinks it’s just a gimmick to make men buy stupid little gifts for their wives or girlfriends, that I can be a bit of a cynic in that regard. I don’t think there’s any reason why people can’t enjoy Valentine’s Day as a nice night out. And that’s what a lot of people were doing. So that’s great! Good for them.

Well, we’re gonna sit here and talk about politics because we’re too cynical for Valentine’s Day, apparently.

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling] So anyway, I think the main topics in the news at the moment are obviously ones that we’ve been talking about on the show a lot lately, which is the totally contrived psyop to take away our freedom of speech and just in general in this country at the state and federal level through these contrived so-called “anti-semitic hate crime” psyops. Where if we just go through some of them, there was obviously the first one in this wave, which was in Ripponlea, in Southeast Melbourne, where a synagogue was firebombed or at least set ablaze at 4 am. Firebombing kind of implies something different, actually. I don’t think it was even firebombed. You could say it was just set on fire at four in the morning. Now that was labelled terrorism immediately. But they haven’t actually got a suspect.

So then they don’t have a motive. So how do they know that it was terrorism? There’s no official suspect, no one’s been charged with any offences in relation to it. The investigation is entirely inconclusive. Which if you’ve been watching this show on a weekly basis, you would remember that was my exact prediction at the time, that there would be no suspect, that there would be no charges, because I suspected that the jews did it themselves! And there was a lot of context around that that made it incredibly suspicious.

Why were there a couple jews inside at 4 o’clock in the morning? Jews don’t pray. They’re not like Christians, they go to the synagogue to read and study the Torah, the Talmud. It’s a legalistic religion. So why do you need to be there at 4 o’clock in the morning? It doesn’t actually make any sense. And secondarily you also have the CSG, the so-called Community Security Group or whatever it is, which is a Mossad front group. It is an IDF front group. It is a jewish security organisation that is paid for by Australian taxpayers that is given all these special rights where they can cruise around with military grade weapons, ex-IDF soldiers in their ranks, to protect jewish community sites and the jewish community in general. They liaise with Victoria police. They all had the night off for some reason. Why were they all told to have the night off? They weren’t there. So that’s incredibly suspicious.

And then also, additionally, yeah, you have the reality of, well, whoever did the attack, they obviously weren’t anti-semitic in the sense that they wanted to actually kill anyone because they showed absolutely zero interest about the people inside. They didn’t attack the people inside.

Now obviously I’m not endorsing this, but I’m saying if they were motivated by trying to kill jews, wouldn’t they have tried to or at least hurt them? No! Instead it was the exact kind of sequence of events you would expect if they did it to themselves, if it was a setup. And even one of the jews who was inside had this whole incoherent story about how he had a burnt hand that made no sense.

And I remember Blair speculating that he probably got accelerant on his hand because he was probably culpable in some way with setting the thing ablaze. So there was that.

Blair Cottrell: The thing is, all we can do is speculate. I mean, it’s possible, it is very suspicious when someone is discovered at the site of an arson attack with a burnt hand. You know, you got to admit that’s a little like any detectives, like what do you call it, investigating this case. They would agree that their first suspect would be the guy that was discovered on the scene with his hand burned.

But obviously they haven’t charged that guy. They have their reasons for not charging that guy.

But when you said that jews don’t pray, is that true? Like they don’t pray at all or do they have some measure of prayer? Do you know what goes on in those synagogues? Is it all just study of the Torah? Because I’ve seen jewish characters like Orthodox ones reading from a book and like rocking back and forth in some sort of what seems like prayer. But you just said they don’t pray. Is that true? That they don’t pray at all?

Joel Davis: In my understanding. I’m not an expert on the wacky religion, but I do know that that’s the purpose of the synagogue. Because the reason why synagogues were originally built, because obviously synagogues have been around for thousands of years. They’re originally built because they were built at a time when you couldn’t own books if you’re an average person. The average person wasn’t even literate, let alone do their personal libraries because the printing press wasn’t invented yet. And so books were incredibly expensive artifacts that took a very long time, a lot of expert labour to create because it had to be handwritten on like papyrus and like that.

And then there was only a very small faction of society that was actually literate enough to read it. So often books were there to help the small minority who were literate basically read and recite things to a larger audience.

So if you’re a jew, you attended the synagogue because then you could go and hear, you know, literally the book being read because it’s a legalistic religion. So it’s important that you understand all the details because there’s all these special rules and so on you have to adhere to.

So that’s kind of the structure of their religion. It’s not the same thing as a church that we would understand in a Christian sense or even a mosque.

[06:25]

But yeah, anyway, the point that I’m making is that that was suspicious and everything that’s happened since has been suspicious and we can’t really expect the police to properly investigate it if the jews were involved because of obvious political reasons. Then you had a few other attacks that have happened. A lot of them were in Sydney, like arson attacks.

There was also like a bunch of graffiti, so-called anti-semitic graffiti, which again, it all is very suspicious. Who would be motivated to go and just spray paint a bunch of swastikas on a synagogue? It’s a little bit contrived.

There was the big “Fuck Israel” that was spray painted in a jewish suburb on a wall. But they spelled Israel wrong. You think if someone was motivated enough to make a political statement like that, they’d at least know how to spell Israel. It’s like kind of like a jew:

“All these dumb goys, they don’t even know how to spell Israel correctly.”

Blair Cottrell: Has there been any movements against the pro-Palestine Muslim community in response or as a result of this anti-semitic task force that apparently has been created in response to these attacks? Well, you know, their attacks, they’re phrased that way, but really we’re just talking about graffiti and property damage. So they’re not really. And no one is specifically being attacked here. It’s kind of just vandalism. Attack is the word that the press has been using, though, to justify the creation of this special anti-semitic task force.

But do we know of any movements that task force have made against the pro-Palestine movement? Because it seems like at this stage, most of the directives, the government directives have been against the far-Right or the nationalist community in the form of censorship. So do we know of any movements against pro-Palestine groups or not yet?

Joel Davis: Not that I’ve seen.

But it’s not that I like super plugged in those circles because they’re all communists and Muslims and these are not people that I associate with. But I haven’t seen any high profile instances of this.

But also it’s all very recent and things have kind of plateaued a little bit with the situation in the Middle East.

So I think it’s kind of gearing up for the next phase because obviously Trump announced plans to seize control of Gaza and forcibly expel the population and so on. So I could imagine the protest movement ramping up if any of what he has stated that he wants to do actually starts getting implemented. But at the moment there’s a ceasefire, right? So at the moment we’re in like an interregnum in the whole Palestine situation. And so the protest movement hasn’t been as voracious as it previously was.

But what we’ve seen from Israel, the Israeli government, is that they’re very upset with Anthony Albanese for being insufficiently up their arse hole. Now, Anthony Albanese is clearly not anti-Israel and the statements of our government are not anti-Israel, but they are insufficiently supportive of Israel from Israel’s point of view. And we’ve seen their leadership come out many times and complain about this. But what’s really pertinent and what really the smoking gun in all of this is that the Sydney arson attacks on synagogues, there were arrests made in those instances.

And when they arrested people, the determination of the police, the head of the Australian Federal Police, and even Anthony Albanese himself, our Prime Minister, was that they weren’t politically motivated attacks, but they were basically it was conducted by organised crime and organised crime were being paid by foreign actors, in crypto.

Now, it doesn’t take very much thought to realise who those foreign actors must have been, which is Israel itself! There’s no other foreign state that would have the incentive to do this. So almost definitely, now we don’t have hard evidence of this, but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. Almost definitely what we’re seeing is that Israel is basically conducting false flag attacks against the Australian jewish community in order to take away our freedom of speech, to punish Australia for being insufficiently pro-Israel, because they feel entitled to our support.

But of course the mainstream media doesn’t present it like that and no leading political figure will come out and say that, even though it’s blatantly obvious to anyone who’s paying attention. You know, I couldn’t be more vindicated about that “Jews Hate Freedom” rally. I really couldn’t.

Then also you had that caravan which we talked about as well, which was discovered in Sydney which was full of all these old explosives with a note inside saying, with an address of a synagogue and “fuck the jews” written on it. It was so cartoonish to the point that even Andrew Bolt was saying:

“This seems like a joke!”

And then we had articles coming out in The Australian [newspaper], I think yesterday or the day before where the article’s headline was, oh, it was an opinion piece. Ah yes:

“Jewish lives are more important than freedom of speech.”

And we’ve seen our politicians over and over and over again reiterate that the reason why, the main reason why they’re strengthening Hate Speech laws at the federal and state level is to protect the jewish community.

Yet they haven’t got one instance of that connects a political motivation to any of these so-called “acts of terrorism”, which, I mean, graffiti isn’t terrorism. Like spray painting a swastika in a synagogue isn’t terrorism by any metric. You could say arson attacks are terrorism because it’s like, I think that’s fair enough to say.

But it’s only terrorism if it’s political. But there’s no political motivation that has been directly linked to any of these attacks. So you can’t say they’re terrorism either.

And the only suspects that we actually have behind these arson attacks realistically are either the jews themselves or Israel itself. They haven’t been able to link one pro-Palestine communist or Muslim or one, you know, anti-semitic nationalist to any of these attacks. And the Feds are pretty far up our arse. I’m sure they’ve got their microscope on the pro-Palestine movement as well. If any of us were involved I’m sure at least one arrest would have been made by now. Right? So it clearly wasn’t us yet.

[12:55]

Blair Cottrell: But it’s not about making arrests, it’s about censorship, so far, …

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: The fact that there is no proof that any of these attacks were politically motivated and no one is actually in custody for having committed any of them, so they don’t really have a strong idea of the motivation.

The fact that no one has actually been attacked yet.

There’s been no physical direct attack against any jewish person. Yet the government has gone ahead and made strong efforts to try to apply political censorship to people on the right side of politics. Specifically, we’re no longer allowed to use X because apparently the Australian government is kind of trying to use all sorts of language to effectively bully Elon Musk’s platform into not allowing us to speak on that platform. And so far they’ve been successful in doing that.

I could imagine there’s a wing of government that’s like:

“What can we call them? What can we type? What word salad can we create to try to bully X, the people working at X to censor these people? Let’s try national security threat, let’s try domestic terrorist groups. Let’s try under investigation for terrorism and see if that works.”

I can imagine they probably sent dozens and dozens of requests that were ignored and then finally some collection of words they came up with actually got them the result they were after. But they probably ramped up their efforts to censor us as a result of all of these “anti-semitic” attacks.

But like you said, there’s no actual proof that they’re politically motivated and there’s certainly no proof that anyone from our wing of politics is involved in any of this stuff. It’s looking a lot more likely that some of these attacks, seeing as the jews are the primary beneficiaries of the attacks, may have been committed by people in that sort of circle, the Israeli, pro-Israeli jewish circles.

But it’s interesting that jewish people legally and socially have more rights and privileges in Australia than White people, than the people who are currently experiencing censorship as a result of the anti-semitic attacks. White people don’t have any ethnic privileges or legal protections in Australia. There is no legal precedent for a White person being discriminated against because of their race or some religion they believe, like in Christianity or something that I know of its almost laughable if a White person says he’s going to take someone to court for racial vilification. But the laws extending to jewish community and the jewish people, stemming from the Racial Discrimination Acts. I think it’s called the Racial Discrimination Act. What is it? The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act? Actually, I think it’s called.

They extend out into state law, and there are so many legal protections and precedents that jewish people can use to protect themselves, already. They already get so much money from the government, and now they already have a special task force that’s out looking for anyone who’s critical of jewish, and is nuking them from the Internet.

It’s like, how much better could life in Australia be for jewish people? How much more protected of a class do these people need to be like? I think we need to have a look at creating some more legal protections for ourselves as White people so that maybe we stand a chance in the future of having at least equal rights to the jews.

Joel Davis: Well, the thing is, a lot of the laws on the books are universal. So in theory, the law should be able to be applied in defense of Whites. But the problem is., …

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but it’s not. Let’s be honest. Like I said, it’s laughable. It’s not. It doesn’t work that way. Even if you ask the AI program, Elon Musk’s AI program, Grok. If you ask that program, as I demonstrated about a week ago on my Telegram, you ask that AI program, are black people protected in Australia? It will say yes, and it’ll give you a direct link to racial religious tolerance acts. If you ask, are Asian people protected? It will say yes. If you ask, are jewish people protected? They’re really protected. There’s more references and laws, you know, pointing to the protection of jewish people than there are for any other race in Australia. Then you ask this AI program, are White people protected in Australia, yes or no? It just says “no” straight up. If you don’t say yes or no, it goes, technically, everyone is universally protected under the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, but there aren’t any legal precedents where a White person has taken anyone to court for discrimination because of their race. Even though discrimination happens all of the time. White people are considered the devils of society responsible for all atrocity in the past. You got White kids in school being raised by activists recruited by the government to teach them that they’re evil for being White because they genocided Aboriginals!

And the only reason they exist now is to pay for all of the atrocities they’ve committed or their ancestors committed in the past. Right? So young White guys are growing up in that environment where they’re heavily discriminated against and demonised and there’s no legal protection for them. Not only is there no legal protection, there’s no community environment for them.

And then the government wonders why they go to Nazi groups. The government’s like seems to be confused as to:

“Oh my God, why are these Nazi groups growing and forming?”

Maybe it’s got something to do with the fact that the government is employing activists teaching young White guys that they’re nothing but evil, genocidal barbarians! Right? If there was a sort of community network or if the government was willing to tolerate some measure of White Identity Politics, then Nazi groups wouldn’t be growing and young guys wouldn’t be joining them. Right? I like to think that the strong nationalist, the growth of strong or radical nationalist groups in Australia is only a natural, organic response to the government being so vehemently anti-White.

If you just look at the education system, it’s full of activists, as I said, teaching young White guys that they’re evil, that they don’t have anything to be proud of, and that their ancestry is nothing but genocide and barbarism! You teach young White guys that some of them are going to try to make amends for it. They’re going to become feminists and transvestites. But not all of them are going to respond that way. Some of them are going to start looking for environments and community groups where they do feel a sense of pride, where they do feel that their ethnicity actually means something. Right?

[18:47]

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, in theory these laws can be used in our defense, but the reason why they aren’t used in our defense is multifarious and subtle.

Number one, if you’re a lawyer who was a pro-White lawyer, you could be booted off the bar. Meaning you can’t actually practice law because of your political associations. So there’s that. Like the fact that we don’t have legal protections for lawyers means that we don’t actually have legal protections in general. Because if lawyers can be politically discriminated against, then anyone who has the ideology that is discriminated against at that level is being discriminated against in toto by the entire legal system. So that’s one reason.

The second reason is because multiculturalism is also a fraud. Every single culture except White culture or Anglo-Celtic culture is able to have representative bodies that are consulted by government and included within the formal structures of multiculturalism.

So “multiculturalism” is a fake term. It basically means everyone culture, everyone’s culture except ours. Basically everyone’s culture, except White people, except actual Australians. So it’s anti-Australian culturalism or anti-White culturalism, if anything. So there’s that reason as well.

So there’s no actual representative bodies. So that if White people are discriminated against or are victims of racial hate crimes, there’s no community bodies that come in and defend them and ensure that there’s media coverage in their defense and put pressure on politicians and so on. We don’t have community leaders. The closest thing we have to that is literally us. But we get demonised as like the most evil, dangerous people in all of Australian political life.

So obviously [chuckling] that isn’t really working in terms of, at least at this stage. That’s what we need to build and we’re going to work towards. But we’re nowhere near that at this point. So those two things basically make these laws, even though they’re in principle universal, in practice, they can’t actually be universally applied.

But additionally, it’s also the prevailing attitude, like the prevailing attitude is that if a White person sees themselves as a victim on the basis of their Whiteness, that this is somehow a danger and a threat to the entire ideological edifice of the system. White people can’t be victims! If a White person is a victim, they just happen to be a victim. It has nothing to do with race or identity. It only can be factored in when someone’s a minority. And obviously that’s like the large contextualizing factor.

And then that gets played into by conservatives, because conservatives at least like the conservative kind of commentary, you know, who they will, generally speaking always try and boil everything down to individualism and say:

“Well, we shouldn’t be seeing things through the prism of race. We shouldn’t be seeing things through the prism of identity politics.”

Well, the reality is White people exist as a group, and so people can hate Whites as a group and attack Whites on the basis of their group identity. Whether you think White should identify as a group or not, that’s just a reality. White people are being attacked on the basis of being White all the time, whether it be institutionally or in the streets or whatever.

And so there needs to be some kind of defense. And they’ll say:

“These conservatives who say identity politics is bad and it’s divisive and so on.”

When jews come along and play identity politics and talk about what’s happening to the jewish community, they don’t go to the jews and say:

“Oh, stop doing this divisive identity politics, we’re all individuals. Being jewish doesn’t matter.”

They go:

“Oh, yes, like, it’s so bad what’s happening to the jewish community.”

And it’s like, wait a second, how come your whole anti-identity politics thing just goes straight out the window when it comes to the jews? So it shows the kind of fraudulence inherent to that whole worldview.

[22:49]

So anyway, the reason why I brought up the fact that there’s been no arrests as well is just to make the point. Or there has been arrests, but if the arrests that have been made, not one’s been politically motivated was to make the point that this is entirely contrived.

But secondarily, even let’s say there was a politically motivated terrorist attack against jews, that still wouldn’t justify changing our Hate Speech laws. Because political speech is something that is completely distinct. There already are laws against terrorism. It’s already illegal to commit terrorism. It’s already illegal to commit arson or violence or even to graffiti on people’s walls. So there’s no need to change any laws. You can just enforce the existing laws.

So it’s like, ridiculous for two reasons. Like, even if you were to accept, even if they were right, that the jewish community is being targeted, it still wouldn’t justify what they’re doing.

But anyway, this is a good bridging point to another kind of development, I guess you could say. But again, it’s also like a running theme, which is the question of how come none of these conservative commentators will debate me. I mean, to be fair, Drew Pavlou debated me, so he actually had the balls to front up and do a debate. And I guess you could say he’s a conservative. I don’t think he identifies as a conservative, but he’s delusional. I told him this, actually, when I met him. When we did the debate, I said:

“Drew, you’re a conservative. You’re a neoconservative.”

And he said:

“No, I’m a Leftist. I’m a liberal.”

I said:

“You’re a neoconservative. Like you belong in the Liberal Party, or if anything, or maybe even One Nation you don’t actually belong in the Labor Party.”

And he loves jews too much, [chuckling] amongst other things, so maybe he’s started to realise that. But other than him, I really can’t think of you know, I’ve challenged quite a lot of people. I’ve challenged Avi Yemini, I’ve challenged Rukshan Fernando. I’ve challenged Joel Jammal [Turning Point Australia], and they’ve repeatedly rejected the request to debate me or the challenge to debate me.

Yet all three of them have a lot to say about me and you and the rest of the movement. All three of them, particularly Rukshan and Avi, they can’t stop talking about us lately. All three of them say that White nationalism is ridiculous! Like we have a ridiculous worldview, …

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s ridiculous if you’re not White. Right? Obviously, it’s not advantageous to you if you’re not White. So none of these guys you described are White, to my understanding. So obviously they’re not going to have any skin in the game with White nationalism.

Joel Davis: But that’s the thing as well. Like, they can’t even use the excuse that:

“Oh, well if I did something with you, then people might think, like, what happened with Sam Newman.”

Even though Sam Newman pushed back against you and Tom.

Then there was the accusation that he was actually sympathizing with you. Well, no one’s going to think that these people are sympathizing with us because, well, number one, it’s a debate. You know, if it’s not a debate, if it’s more of a friendly discussion, that accusation can make some sense. But if it’s a debate, well, you’re oppositional and secondarily, they’re not even White. So obviously they’re not Nazis. Obviously they’re not nationalists like White nationalists. So that threat doesn’t actually exist.

The only conceivable reason why they keep refusing to debate me is because they know that I’ll fucking win the debate and make them look retarded! And they’d basically be participating in a spectacle that embarrasses them.

Blair Cottrell: What if they’re worried about just providing a larger platform? They just don’t want to provide you a platform. Maybe that’s part of the reason?

Joel Davis: Well, in the case of well, to be fair, Avi Yemini has a pretty large platform, but he does a show pretty regularly.

Blair Cottrell: He doesn’t get many views, though, for someone with the amount of followers he has, his views are shit!

But I think his views would be boosted massively if he did debate you. Like, he could start rivaling the kind of views you used to get on Twitter.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be the biggest thing he’s done in a while to debate me. Everyone would tune in. I think people around the world would be interested in that because Avi has got a bit of a global reputation. Because he’s always he’s not just talking about Australia, he’s always defending Israel.

Blair Cottrell: The whole position that Avi and some of these other characters, these Right-wingers. What would you even call these people? How would you describe them? Conservatives of some type? The position they used to take is like the position against the:

“Oh, we don’t like feminism. We want to promote family values and quote, unquote, “‘Australian values’. That’s what we stand for.”

That stuff’s not cool anymore. It’s not edgy enough anymore. You can’t just stand by this whole, …

Joel Davis: Didn’t he beat his wife? And like, isn’t he like, raising., …

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, that’s a personal matter.

But what I’m saying is say they stand for, they’re against feminism. They’re for family values. They don’t like transvestites and stuff like that. All right, but that sort of stuff isn’t pushing the envelope far enough these days. It’s not cool enough anymore. You have to get a bit more fundamental than that! You have to get a bit more ethnic than that. But these guys don’t want to get ethnic because if they get ethnic, then they kind of forced to admit they’re just pretending to be Australian and they’re really just supporting a kind of idea or an abstract theory about values which is advantageous to them because they’re not actually Australians. They’re just pretending to be. Right?

[28:13]

Joel Davis: Well, that’s absolutely true, but I don’t even think Rukshan and Avi even say edgy stuff on feminism. Like, maybe they’ll say stuff like, there’s only two genders, but they’re the kinds of people that would criticise Islam for being anti-feminist or something and be like, to defend our feminists. They oppose transgenderism and Islam on the basis that, it’s bad for women’s rights or something. Not that I’m endorsing it, Sharia law, obviously, it’s a silly, false dichotomy to set up. But that’s the kind of rhetoric that people like that use.

So really, like they’re not even that edgy on that subject. Like, they’re not really edgy on anything at all!

Blair Cottrell: I’m sorry to put it simply, they’re boring. Their politics is boring, their commentary is boring, and people just don’t care about what they have to say. They’re not as interesting as far-Right nationalists. They’re not as interesting as National Socialists. They’re not as interesting as the guys who believe in an ethnic basis for the Australian identity. These are the guys that are sort of carrying the banner of the future movement of the Right-wing. People who are sitting in that:

“Oh, you can be Australian if you’re Indian. You just need to agree and adhere to a set of shared values.”

That’s gay, it’s weak, it’s boring! Australians are sick of hearing that shit! Australians are ready to hear a fundamental ethnic message. And that’s why characters like us are being targeted with political censorship, whereas characters like Rukshan and Avi are still allowed to spread their message because their message is not fundamentally hostile or challenging to the establishment the way ours is.

Joel Davis: I mean, that’s all very true. I would say also, where the hell are the White conservative commentators? Like, where’s the new young, White guys that are going to fly the flag of like, civic nationalist cuckservatism? Like, it seems like they can’t even produce them anymore. All the guys they’re producing in this generation are all brown.

Like where’s the Andrew Bolts of the new generation or whatever? Like, it seems. And it’s obvious why they can’t produce those. Because any talented young White guys with any kind of dynamism is going to be attracted to nationalism. There’s people like Jordan Knight or Auspil, people who aren’t as radical as us, but you can see that they’re nationalists. That’s what they’re concerned about. They’re not concerned about upholding this, … Really. It’s a dead ideology that’s really only held by Gen-X’s and Boomers. This cuckservative, civic nationalist position., …

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just dead, it’s shallow, …

Joel Davis: … Who’s into, like, Right-wing political commentary is either going to be into, like actual nationalism or who’s into political commentary in general. They’re either going to be into actual nationalism or they’re going to be Leftists. Like, there’s pretty much no one in that bizarre middle ground.

Blair Cottrell: I’ll see if I can get this together. This thought that I was just having. I think it’s because that Neo-conservatism, whatever you call it, that the Indians are going for and the Avi Yemenis of the world, it’s a shallow ideology! It’s a shallow ideology which serves as a means for people who aren’t Australian, they can pretend that they’re Australian. They can kind of pose as Australians and try to trick the Australian community into giving them their money, attention and votes. So they basically can continue to Hoodwink the Australian people into believing they have some sort of representation when they actually don’t.

The only people who are going to represent White Australian workers are White Australian workers, not sort of jewish, Israeli Avi Yemenis or Indian Rukshans that are posing as Australians and disguising themselves as the same as us, because shared values.

When it comes down to it, we need representations from our own kin. We can’t just keep following brown people who promise to do everything right by us because shared values. That time is gone, it’s dead. Everyone sees through that now. And that’s why, I suppose, there aren’t any young White people going for the conservative Party or movement these days.

Joel Davis: Yeah, like if you see pictures of like the Young Liberals events and so on, I mean the Young Labor, forget about it. It’s really spot the Aussie there.

But even in the Young Liberals events, I mean it’s majority non-White at this point in Melbourne and Sydney. The future of the major parties is brown and yellow. It is not White. There’s no new generation coming through on either side.

But if you look at like the Greens, they’re White as fuck actually! They’re like one of the Whitest parties in Parliament. And obviously when we build our Nationalist party, everyone will be White.

So that’s what you’re going to see. Like White people are going to polarise to either the far-Left or the far-Right. And the centre is going to be held by the immigrant sludge of mystery meat. And that’s just how it is because as you said correctly, that ideology it’s a disingenuous position held by non-Whites to basically say:

“Hey, like be inclusive to my existence and then perpetuate the Australia that I want which is an Australia that exists purely to be an economic system that everyone can benefit from these more fundamental questions of values and identity. The fact that White people are being genocided, we don’t want to deal with these more fundamental questions.”

[33:49]

Whereas White people are in an existential crisis where it’s either they have White guilt and are suicidal, or actually we’d like to keep having our own country.

And so we polarise to those fringes on this existential question which they don’t want White people to be confronting. They want to lull us back to sleep into some like status quo because that’s what benefits them. So it’s easier for them to parasitize off us. They basically they’re benefiting from how things are and they don’t want it to change.

And you know, someone like Rukshan, for example, it’s actually great that he keeps taking the bait and responding to often like it isn’t even my provocation, I’m not even on Twitter anymore. But he can’t help himself but keep talking about us. It’s great because he’s showing the fraudulence of his position. Because when he goes and speaks to so-called conservative audiences, he’s like:

“I’m such a proud Australian and I love this country and I want to serve this country and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”

But as soon as an actual Australian comes along and says:

“Well, hey, actually it’s my ancestors who built this country, not yours and therefore we should run it.”

Then all of a sudden he goes into this whole meltdown about how White Australians are lazy Centrelink dole bludgers and we need to bring Indians in to like run the country. Because like White Australians, real Australians are all useless cunts apparently.

And it’s like:

“Hey, wait a second, I thought you love being Australian. You love this country, it’s your home. So why are you shitting all over the founding stock?”

Well, it shows that he’s actually resentful. He knows that he doesn’t belong here. He knows that he’s the odd man out. And as soon as anyone cotton’s onto that bullshit, he has a bit of a meltdown and he shows the truth what lurks beneath this visage that is put up. And it’s the same with all of these browns.

You know, at the end of the day I would say all of them actually, because some of them have a bit of a different reaction, I think. I want to play this clip and I want to like analyze it with this kind of funny. So like, obviously we can’t have Tom on the show at the moment because of ridiculous bail conditions that Tom and I are subject to. But I can play a clip from his stream. This isn’t a form of communication.

So this is a clip from. Tom did a stream the other day and he talked about the Ralph Babet question. Obviously Senator Babet he’s been in the news a bit lately. He’s been doing some all right stuff and he just put a Bill before the Parliament which will get voted down to have a referendum to add an American style First Amendment to our Constitution to protect our freedom of speech.

And obviously I would support that. It won’t pass. We won’t get that referendum, at least not under the current government. But anyway, this is what Tom had to say.

Tom Sewell: Senator Babet, Bronze power. Caramel Power. The reason why he’s getting deported last is because he’s actually probably one of the most supportive politicians in the country for us. Everything he advocates for is actually by default, in our defense. He’s going to be deported last. He’s been the last brown to leave the country. We should have a ceremony, a goodbye Babbitt ceremony. We will march down the caramel carpet onto a private jet which is going to say Bronze Power on it, or Caramel Power. We’re going to reward him with an island near Mauritius in the Indian Ocean. We’re going to deport all the caramel honeys to Babet Island. And Babet is going to rule over harem of caramel women. He can’t stay in the country. He is getting deported! But he’s going to get the first class deportation treatment.

And I think that that’s fair. All right. I’m a fair guy. I’m a man of my word. So, Babet, if you’re out there, if you’re listening, you are going home. But if you look after us, we’ll look after you. That’s as far as it goes.

Joel Davis: Anyway. Obviously you’re kind of funny, like. Right. But I’m disappointed that Senator Babet didn’t respond to that because he definitely saw it.

So I would have liked to have [chuckling] hear what he had to say because it’s pretty funny.

But the reason why I played that is because actually I went on after the stream we did last week, I went on Australians versus the Agenda and the guy who hosts it, I don’t actually know exactly what his ethnic background is because that was the first time I’ve ever had a conversation with him.

But I think he’s Lebanese or half Lebanese or something. And anyway, basically Avi Yemeni and Rukshan Fernando, they’re really upset at him for platforming me. They said:

“Oh, like when it’s fine if you’re like Sam Newman and you’re hostile and you, like, attack their ideas, but you just sat there and let Joel just spout his ideology for two and a half hours. And so you’re a piece of shit! You’re enabling Nazis!”

Blair Cottrell: Free speech, man! Free speech. I thought these people are about free speech. Apparently not.

[38:38]

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s a few things to analyze in this, but he’s like:

“And you know, if Joel and his guys got in power, they’d deport you too. Don’t you realise that?”

And then his response was. His name’s Anthony. His response was:

“Oh, but you’re just upset that you’re not going to Caramel Island. You know, I’m going to Caramel Island!”

So [chuckling] it was quite funny. And that’s the thing. Like, if there are people who are brown who want to actually work with us to accomplishing our goals, then, yeah, like, we want to have our own country, like, we can be human. We can reward you in some other way. As Tom said in that video, there’s all these caramel honeys. We got to get them out of the country too, because we don’t want the White boys race mixing.

So there’s an arrangement. There’s a way we can work this out that everyone’s happy with first class deportations. But Rukshan and Fernando, he’s not getting the first class treatment, right? He’s getting deported first, if he’s lucky, right? See which side you want to play. And the thing is Rukshan will go on and these people go on and say:

“Oh, these Nazis, they’re just a fringe movement. They’re no real threat.”

Well, if we’re no real threat, why do you keep talking about us? Why do you get so freaked out whenever anyone platforms us? Why do you claim to support free speech but celebrate when we get banned from Twitter? What that indicates is that actually. Oh, and why do you refuse to debate me?

The reason why they do all these things is because they’re actually afraid. They’re afraid of the White man in this country waking up and building a political movement that would kick them out, that would take back control of our country. They’re petrified! They must be. Otherwise they wouldn’t see me as a threat. Otherwise they would be quite happy to debate me and to be confident they could beat me. Because they wouldn’t think my ideas are convincing. They wouldn’t think they’d have any appeal, but clearly they do. And that explains their behaviour entirely. So that’s what’s really lurking beneath the surface here.

Also, the way the government is treating us. If we were just like a fringe movement that can’t grow, that has no legitimacy or whatever, no one will ever resonate with us, why ban us off X? Why all the media hit pieces? Why try to throw us all in jail?

Obviously there’s a fear that if we’re allowed to operate, we will grow and grow and grow and eventually become, eventually contest for political power and become like an actual power faction in this country. And it makes sense because, …

Blair Cottrell: If you give nationalists the same rights to speak and organise the same rights everybody else has politically, Australia becomes nationalist in five years.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree with that. And we saw that when you originally came onto the scene where there was more free speech back then and your movement grew really rapidly, extremely rapidly. That’s pulling Pauline Hanson out of retirement. They had to engage in all these lawfare tactics to get you guys all tied up in the courts and break up your movement, because they were petrified at its potential.

So anyway, that’s just the reality.

And the thing is that obviously if White Australians did get organised, there are already like probably millions, at least hundreds of thousands of Australians that have White nationalist sentiments. I would say millions have White nationalist sentiments. Hundreds of thousands have White nationalist views already. And that’s only going to grow. It’s growing rapidly and it’s only going to grow because of the wider circumstances.

Like issues that White nationalists care about are the number one or the major issues in Australian politics right now, whether it be jewish tyranny, whether it be mass immigration, whether it be anti-White discrimination, what have you. These are the big issues of our time. Even mainstream politics is kind of oscillating around them. It’s not an environment where nationalism is going to go backwards, even despite all the censorship.

And then you can see also like as soon as X gets opened up with a modicum of free speech, who benefits under those conditions? White nationalists and Nazis! All these Leftists are like:

“Oh man, this site got turned into a fucking, into 4chan into in the space of a year!”

Well, that’s what happens when you unleash freedom online. Anywhere where there’s like freedom of speech online, it becomes a Right-wing space.

So obviously our ideas, our culture and so on has gravitas, it has legitimacy, otherwise it wouldn’t keep winning out whenever it’s given a free market to compete in the only way they can keep us from growing is to lock us out of the game.

But now even locking us out of the game presents a problem because what it does is it implodes the legitimacy of the people locking us out. Whether it be these conservative commentators who claim to be supporting free speech and against cancel culture and to love Australia and all this nonsense! Well, the way they act towards us implodes that legitimacy. It shows the truth of what they’re doing. They’re just gatekeepers with a racial animus against Whites.

And when it comes to the state itself, well, the entire edifice of liberal democracy is being self imploded by the State, which is its fundamental source of legitimacy, in order to lock us out. They said that we’re terrorists. We say:

“Hey, we want to build a political party. Hey, we just want to have a peaceful political movement where we’re at to bring our ideas to the people, to the free market of ideas, exercise our liberal democratic rights just like everybody else.”

And they go:

“No, like we’ve got to shut you down!”

It’s like:

“Well, I thought you were saying that we were terrorists and we were dangerous. Now we’re trying to play by the rules and you’re preventing us from playing by the rules.”

Isn’t that actually what creates terrorism? When people feel so disenfranchised and alienated that they end up doing something stupid because they don’t feel like they have any other anywhere else to turn? Like if a, and hopefully it doesn’t happen, but if some lone wolf, you know, White nationalist neo-Nazi terrorist attack ever happens in this country, it won’t be our fault! It’ll be the fault of the government for making White people feel so alienated by not allowing us to play by the rules so that we can actually give hope to White nationalists in this country that they have a political movement that has any viability.

And that’s even what the head of ASIO said the last time did a Senate inquiry about whether we should be listed as a terrorist organisation. Not only did he say that we’re not terrorists, he said that the real threat comes from lone wolf actors who feel demoralised that the movement that actual organisations like ours can’t succeed. And so they end up doing something, you know, “taking matters into their own hands”, quote unquote. Right?

[45:18]

So that whole narrative doesn’t make any sense that they put forward. And it’s obvious to an increasingly large number of people that it doesn’t make any sense. Like the I do a “jews hate freedom” rally with the boys and they immediately raid my house and arrest me because jews go on television and demand that I’m arrested and then change all the laws that I just said in my speech they would change to try and make it even easier for them to arrest me. And people like me doing those kinds of rallies in the future. It’s like, you just proved my point!

Or we go and do our Australia Day rally and they arrest guys singing Waltzing Matilda waving Aussie flags on national television. And then they wonder why all these people want to join us and we’re growing and they have to ban us from Twitter because we got too popular too quickly. And it’s like you guys are just nuking your own legitimacy trying to stop us. You’re actually fueling our rise anyway.

So that’s the thing with this Avi Yemeni situation. This spectre of refusing to debate me will keep lingering over his head.

And that’s something that everyone needs to take responsibility for. If you’re on X, if you’re anywhere where these pieces of shit are operating, remind them that they’re too fucking pussy to debate me at all times. I want them to be badgered and hounded for months, years, even, if that’s what’s necessary, until they break.

And then we’ll get them in a debate scenario, and then I’ll destroy them, and it’ll be fantastic! So.

Blair Cottrell: But from what I’ve heard, Joel, from what I’ve heard from them, you’re just not intellectual enough and your ideology just isn’t sophisticated enough for their [chuckling] highly nuanced and superior intellectual conservatism! You just wouldn’t stand up in debate against these superior individuals. They’re clearly smarter than you, and that’s why they shouldn’t be debating. That’s what they think anyway. What do you have to say to that?

Joel Davis: Well, that’s an easy W. Like, I knew Drew Pavlou was too dumb to debate me. They didn’t stop me because I was like:

“Well, it’s going to be an easy W.”

And this went and took the easy W, and I got drunk while I was doing it on the set because I was like:

“This guy’s a idiot. Like, all I need to do is sit here and talk. I don’t even have to prepare, and it will just be a total destruction.”

So if I’m such an idiot, then. But I’m not an idiot! Everyone knows I’m not an idiot! You say what you want. You might think an arsehole, you might think a lot of things about me, but one thing that no one thinks is that I’m not intelligent. So let’s see. And I’m good at debating.

So let’s set up a debate. If I’m so dumb it should be easy for them to win! That’s the thing. This Joel Jammal guy who, I will say the difference between him and the others is that he was a lot more respectful, amicable. He said that he thought it was wrong that we were banned from X and that he hopes that we can get back on and he wished us luck in our legal cases. And like he did say that he didn’t think that we were being treated fairly even though he doesn’t agree with our ideas. So I will say this, he is a class, above these other characters, …

Blair Cottrell: He doesn’t appear to be understanding how the system is rigged against nationalism. It’s like you only get censored or experience political censorship if you’re representing ethnic nationalism in Australia. You only get hate speech charges if you’re representing ethnic nationalism in Australia.

Have you appealed your X suspension? Have you had a reply yet? Because I put in a couple of appeals and they haven’t even bothered to answer me back with a reason as to why I was actually suspended. Yeah, there you go. They don’t even need a reason to suspend you’re being suspended because of what you believe. You’re an ethnic nationalist and that’s not allowed in modern multicultural Australia. So there have your suspension. That’s the way things go. What are we going to do about it? What can we do about it? That’s just the way things have always gone. The whole system is rigged against us!

But as you said, it kind of works to our advantage in the end because it implodes their legitimacy and reveals that they do have to rig the whole system against us in order to maintain the current establishment and way of things.

[49:34]

Joel Davis: The only other group in this country that faces any kind of, it’s not as much as what we face, but that faces any kind of like pushback from the state, other than us, are the pro-Palestine people.

Blair Cottrell: They don’t get that much. Funnily enough, if you ask the pro-Palestine movement:

“Who’s in charge of Australia, who’s in charge of America?”

They’ll say:

“White supremacy or White supremacists.”

They don’t like Israel, but they think White supremacy is probably like the core problem and Israel is just benefiting from international White supremacy.

But then when you present people like us who are representing White nationalism around the world, Australia, there’s other people like us in America and Europe as well. And you present the kind of situation we’re faced with where we can’t even use social media. A lot of the times our bank accounts get closed, we get knocks at the door from government goons asking us personal questions about our lives. We’re on a fucking watch list! How’s that for White supremacy being in charge of everything? You can’t even actually identify as a proud White person without being put on a fucking watch list! How the hell is White supremacy in charge?

Obviously White people are just being used by Israel. It comes down to Israel and jewish money being at the centre of everything, not fucking White supremacy! I hope some pro-Palestinian is watching this.

Joel Davis: But insofar as like the pro-Palestine movement gets policed, they pick off the ones that focus in on the jews and they leave., … Like they like to have the communists in charge, the pro-Palestine movement, and even like a lot of jews who claim to be against the state of Israel running the movement, because it keeps the movement directed in that anti-White supremacy framework, and blame White people for the crimes of Israel.

But usually it’s like a more of a Muslim rather than one of these communists who then start like actually veering into like more direct:

“Nah, it’s the jews!”

Those are the ones that get smacked! So the pro-Palestine movement is very carefully controlled to keep it with a certain ideological bent. I’ve noticed this over the years, particularly in recent years.

But you know, I’m not in the pro-Palestine movement. Fundamentally I don’t really give a fuck about Palestine, if I’m perfectly honest. I’ve said that on the show many times before.

I don’t like Israel because of the impact that Israel has. The parasitical relationship and the tyrannical relationship, the subversive relationship it has with my country and with other White countries. That’s my beef with Israel. The dispute between them and the Palestinians is between them and the Palestinians as far as I’m concerned.

But yeah, nevertheless, the point, the reason why I brought that up is because, yeah, as you said, not only is the system anti-White, it’s also obviously pro-jewish. And like, that’s literally our whole narrative. [chuckling] Like, how can you like, the only people that know what’s going on in politics are White nationalists and jews! We’re the only two people in politics that are operating with an actual cogent understanding of what’s happening. Everyone else is ideologically befuddled! And they’re suffering from misdirection and incoherence.

But, yeah, you’re about to be talking about Joel Jammal. We went off on a bit of a sidetrack. What Joel Jamal said was he wouldn’t debate me because he doesn’t want to, … It would be really strategically good for me to get access to his audience. And I’ve got a much smaller following.

Blair Cottrell: Who is Joel Jammal? I’ve never heard of Joel Jamaml. Who is he?

Joel Davis: Exactly! He’s like, I think half Syrian, half Lebanese conservative. He runs a small organisation which is a copy and paste of Turning Point USA, which is a very big organisation in America. Conservative organisation. But he runs, quote, unquote, “Turning Point Australia”.

But insofar as it’s an organisation, it appears to basically just be a Facebook group and a mailing list. And he kind of speaks at conservative events. So if that’s an organisation, I guess it’s an organisation. But he runs that he has a small podcast live stream type show that barely gets a thousand views an episode. And he has about 8,000 followers on Twitter. So I mean, he’s got a massive audience, clearly, right? So that would be such a huge boon for me! [sarcasm] But like, no one even knows who he is.

The reason why I want to debate him is very simple. It’s the fact that I’m just like desperate for a debate [chuckling] and no one’s debating me, number one. And number two, it’s that he actually made a video or he put out a little video on his Twitter where he said to his credit, as I said:

“It’s wrong that were banned from Twitter.”

And he said the reason why it was bad is because it’s better to debate White nationalists and try and convince them out of their ideology than to send them to, or send us to like some online ghetto where we’re just going to talk to each other and radicalise ourselves even further without any communication with the rest of society. And no, I agree with that. If our ideas are so retarded, we want to be part of the conversation. Put us, put me in the conversation.

Everyone who has a different view. Who’s representative of a different view, let’s debate it, let’s discuss it and let’s work it out. Maybe I am saying something wrong. Let’s see what you have to say. I think I’m saying things clearly. I think I’m going to win all these debates, quite clearly. But let’s put it to the test. I’m willing to put it to the test.

So he was saying that and then he played a clip and the clip was from like five years ago and it was like some live stream that David Hiscox was on and Riccardo Bosi was on. Riccardo Bosi* is a lunatic conspiracy theorist. He might even be an agent of some sort, because it’s almost like his conspiracy theorist cult is almost too for me to believe that he’s not a fed of some type.

But if he isn’t a fed, he’s a psychopath. Like he’s a literal sociopathic, you know, lunatic that is preying upon schizophrenic idiots to take their money and God knows what else.

[* Riccardo Umberto Guerrino Bosi is an Australian conspiracy theorist and former Australian Army Special Forces lieutenant colonel. He is the founder of the AustraliaOne political party. Bosi is known for pushing Covid-19 misinformation and genocide denial. Wikipedia]

[56:05]

But anyway, he played a clip of Riccardo Bosi and David Hiscox and they were debating whether culture comes from race or if culture has nothing to do with race or whatever. And it wasn’t really like a full debate. It was like a clip. It was mostly Riccardo Bosi giving his opinion and Hiscox. It didn’t show Hiscox. I didn’t see the whole video that it was clipped from. I don’t know if he made more elaborate arguments, other parts of that video. But Hiscox was kind of just like asserting his position, but they didn’t really get into him like breaking down all the chains of reasoning. So it wasn’t really like a very good debate. But he took a clip from that and said:

“Oh, every time White nationalists ever confront anyone outside their ideology, they get smoked because their ideas are so ridiculous!”

And I was thinking, well when I debated Drew Pavlou, the consensus was that I destroyed him. And that was probably the biggest debate in terms of views in like recent Australian political history. Like, there hasn’t been another debate between two Australian citizens. We can’t really call Drew an Australian, can we? But two Australian citizens.

Since then it’s got more views. Like, I can’t think of one. Like, if anyone has seen one, like post it in the comments. I can’t think of one. They didn’t want to clip from that. He got some obscure clip from some stream that no one remembers that probably not that many people watched at the time. And I said:

“Well, look, if you want to debate White nationalists, if you’re saying that we need to be debated rather than ghettoized, and if you think that our ideas are so ridiculous that every time we get into a debate we lose, why don’t you debate me, Joel? Why don’t you debate me? And let’s see.”

But then he had this whole cope excuse why he wouldn’t debate me. So, it’s standard from these people. It’s obviously cowardice. Like he was like worried about me getting access to his audience. What does that imply? That implies that he thinks he’ll lose the debate and I’ll convert members of his audience to my position. Because like I’m not worried about him getting access to my audience. I don’t think I would debate him and Joel Jamal would convert a bunch of like my like White nationalist followers into conservatives or something. Because I have confidence in my position, I have confidence in my abilities. He obviously doesn’t.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, can’t disagree with any of that. I’m angry tonight! I don’t know what’s going on. I’m just angry! I’m not in a mood to talk. Sometimes I just don’t feel like talking and I just, I’m just angry! Like I just want to hurt someone, and that’s the way I’m feeling tonight. So feel free to keep the conversation going, man, and I’ll chime in when I can. But to be honest, I’m just really mad tonight. So sorry if I’m not contributing the way I usually would.

Joel Davis: Well, what’s getting you mad?

Blair Cottrell: The heat. I hate summer! It seems so bright outside, and being surrounded by Indians doesn’t help. I’m woken up sometimes because there’s some Indians living on my street and there’s like 30 of them in the house coming and going, even at 2 o’clock in the morning, I don’t know what they’re doing. Their children are up at that time as well. It’s like Wednesday night, it’s a school night and there’s like seven, eight year old children running around the streets barefoot, screaming and shit! And I don’t know what kind of standards and ethics these people actually raise families by. It’s fucking weird! But look, there’s various circumstances that are having an effect on me, making me a little displeased.

But it’s mostly the heat, man. Do you ever feel like we’re not from this planet? Like we’re too close to the fucking sun or something? I mean, think about it. We’re supposed to have evolved on this planet. Yeah, but every other animal on this planet. I’m going to segue a little bit here. Every other animal on this planet has scales, feathers, thick hide, fur, is equipped to deal with the elements. What have we got? We got this pink soft skin! We can’t even walk outside without protective footwear. We can’t be in the sun longer than a few hours without like getting burned, cooked and cancers! And we’re supposed to have evolved here. It doesn’t make any fucking sense! We have to build these really sophisticated shelters with temperature control just to live on this planet. Like where are we actually from? It says in the Bible “man is in the world, but not of the world”. Are we from this planet? Are we from somewhere else? Because it doesn’t seem like we developed, … And people say:

“Oh, it’s because we had technology, Blair. We evolved as a result of our technology and our shelters and stuff like that.”

Well, isn’t that like de-evolving so that we’re less equipped to deal with the elements? What kind of sense does that make? And we haven’t had this technology for very long.

So I don’t know. Man, I just can’t wait for winter. I can’t wait for the cold, the ice. I can’t wait to get a good night’s sleep in some reasonable fucking temperature. I’m sick of the heat. I don’t like it here. I don’t like it here in summer. I got to be honest, I’m too hot right now, and it’s difficult.

[1:00:56]

Joel Davis: I mean, we’re obviously not native to Australia, are we? So it’s obviously too hot. Like we belong in northern Europe.

Blair Cottrell: We’re the native Australians because we created the continent, or not the continent, but we created the nation state, Australia.

Before we got here, the British, there was no Australia. There was just this unmapped land mass with some semi-nomadic tribes raping their own children and eating each other.

Joel Davis: We’re supposed to be in northern Europe. Like that’s what we’re., …

Blair Cottrell: I want to be in the snow, man. I just want to go back to the snow. I want to go somewhere where it’s too cold for Indians to follow so I can get a good night’s sleep and not listen to screaming Indian children at 2 o’clock in the morning. I mean, sometimes I’m laying there and I’m thinking I’m almost at my wit’s end and I’m worried. I’m scared because I’m thinking, what am I going to do if I snap? What am I going to do? Am I going to kick that door in over there? I don’t even know what I’m going to do. And I get worried like that. I worry myself.

So I’ve got to like just try to trap myself in the house and block out all the noise. And I don’t know, does anybody else experience this when they’re surrounded by these people? I’m unlucky too, because the area where I live there’s not many immigrants. But unfortunately on the street I’m living on, there happens to be immigrants like all around. And I don’t know, man, I could just rant and carry on about this, but it’s not going to change, is it? It’s only going to get worse.

But there’s this two tier system, two tiers of existence. I was thinking about this today. For the average White Australian. The lower tier is you don’t say anything about the situation. You’re White. This only applies to White people, right? You’re White, you don’t say anything about the situation in your country and you get to live in some semblance of this liberal, democratic freedom. So long as you don’t say anything about the immigration. And so long as you don’t acknowledge that you’re White or that that might not might be significant somehow. If you don’t say anything about that, you get some semblance of freedom. You get left alone. You have to deal with all the immigrants and the traffic and you know, getting pushed out of your own job and having to find a different job because your employer is going to employ cheap foreign labour instead of you deal with all that, but you at least get left alone. You get your [word unclear], you get your freedom of speech, as long as you don’t say anything about the immigration, so long as you don’t acknowledge that you’re White.

But if you do start opposing the immigration, and especially if you start acknowledging your ethnic identity as a White person, you cross over into this second tier of existence where you experience full communism! Where suddenly you’re on a watch list! Suddenly you can’t have a bank account, not for long. Suddenly you’re in court for hate speech and your government goons knocking on your door asking you questions about your personal life.

And that’s the two tier system in Australia right now. The two tiers of existence. And I suppose most people live in that lower tier of existence where they just don’t say anything because it’s easier not to say anything. And it pisses me off, man! It angers me that people do that! The people go through life not acknowledging the obvious decay decline of their society!

But average people, I can’t be too angry about it because average people aren’t really geared to deal with stuff like this. Okay, I’ve lost connection now.

Joel Davis: No, I can still hear you. We just lost the visual.

Blair Cottrell: I just said my browser’s lost connection or something. Maybe it’s a sign I should shut up! I don’t know. Sometimes it just all gets to a point for me, man, where I’m just really angry at the situation.

Like before when I was trying to explain that the formation of Nazi groups and young guys joining Nazi groups is obviously a natural, organic response to an education system employing activists that demonise White people, where White people, young White guys don’t feel any connection to a national community. They don’t feel any sort of ethnic support. They don’t have any ethnic support groups to go to.

So obviously they can choose to stay in a system that’s telling them that they need to pay. Their existence is just as a tax mule to pay for the atrocities committed by their ancestors! Or the alternative is they can go into a community that’s saying:

“Hey, you’ve actually got a lot to be proud of! You’ve got a great history, you’re a member of a great race! We’ll tell you about it. Come on!”

Obviously they’re going to join a group that’s telling them that. They’re not going to stay in a system that’s demonizing them.

So it’s like, how do these government goons think that that’s not going to happen? How do they sort of logically try to understand the formation of Nazi groups without understanding that they’re responsible for creating them?

Like, if the government was going to allow or make permissible even the slightest amount of White Identity Politics, then Nazi groups wouldn’t exist. But no, they can’t acknowledge any kind of positive White Identity. They can’t do it because White people are the devils of society, the designated devils. And that’s the way it’s going to stay. And so Nazi groups will keep growing. It’s that simple, isn’t it?

[1:05:44]

Joel Davis: I mean, well, that’s like people say to me:

“Oh, Joel, why do you have to do the Nazi thing?”

And I’m like:

“Well, my race is being genocided and my country is being stolen from me.”

And they’re like:

“Yeah, yeah, I know, but like, why can’t you just be an immigration restrictionist?”

And it’s like:

“Well, obviously that isn’t gonna fucking work, is it? You know, the reason why we’re Nazis is because they’re trying to fucking kill us!”

Extreme problems require extreme solutions. Like, if we’re going to have a defense, the best form of defense is the most extreme form of defense. Like from an ideological standpoint, like the pure position. Yeah, some people will water it down, but the absolute maximum that we can do in defense of our race is what is necessary right now. I probably wouldn’t have become a Nazi if my race wasn’t being genocided. It wouldn’t have felt necessary.

I mean, the Germans only became Nazis because the jews were stealing their country from them and raping their country. Like, Nazism is what happens to White people when you push them too fucking far!

So, yeah, and maybe that’s wrong! Maybe realistically I should have become a Nazi anyway without this pressure.

But that is what it is.

Blair Cottrell: It’s like this is the inevitable result.

Joel Davis: Now if they start allowing White Identity Politics, … Now they pushed us too hard. So when, if they try to do some pressure release valve and allow kind of optical White nationalism back into play, it’s going to unleash a cascade.

And they know that’s why they’re holding it back and it wouldn’t have been if they allowed it 20 years ago, like when Pauline Hanson and One Nation were running, if they allowed them to do their thing and to shut down the borders and to take over the Right-wing and to keep Australia I don’t know, 90 percent White or something, then everyone would have gone back to watching the cricket and everything would have just kept cruising along. Australia would have continued on as it was, with stability.

But they pushed us too far now, and they’ve made the problem too difficult. Like, it isn’t just about shutting the borders now. There’s too many fucking people here! They have to be sent back in their millions to be able to get our country back. Well, who has the stomach to do that? Who has the determination to seize control of the state and forcibly expel millions of people from our land? Only we do! That’s why we are what we are.

So, yeah, we’re the natural kind of reaction and the natural solution to the problem. Like, we didn’t start this. No, we didn’t shoot the first shot across the bow or whatever, you know.

But yeah, the government as well, like the fear that they have, it’s indicative of the fact that they know that our potential is massive! Because at the end of the day, like they’re stealing our country from us! Like they’re all traitors, they’re all corrupt, they’re complicit in a globalist agenda to genocide our race and to steal all of our wealth.

So they know, like and the same with the jews. There’s a reason why the jews are so paranoid. There’s a reason why the jews always seem to be overreacting, why they’re always so hysterical! Because they know what they’re doing! They know that if the White man ever gets organised, they’re fucked! And the party’s over and justice is going to come. They act guilty, they show their guilt through their behaviour.

So I mean, just the other day, … I won’t actually mention that story. Actually I decided against it for legal reasons.

But you know, so many times there’ll be situations like when I’ve been fired from jobs or asked to leave certain associations because of who I am or when I’ve heard stories from others in the organisation, public facing figures, like hearing the stories from like Tim Lutz for example, and what happened to him after he got doxed. How he was basically kicked out of the entire boxing community and his kid was even like kicked out of like karate competitions even though he’s like an 11 year old kid because his dad’s a Nazi and things like that.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man, the sort of circumstances, you have to endure.

Joel Davis: Always the same thing when you get kicked out, never do they go:

“We don’t like what you believe and that’s why we’re kicking you out.”

Or something. What they always say is:

“We’re really sorry but this is going to cause a lot of problems for us and we don’t want to have to do this to you. But if we kept you on, this could happen. That could happen and we don’t want to get in trouble.”

And that’s kind of how the whole thing is kept together. Like it isn’t that everyone are true believers in the ideology of the regime. It isn’t that everybody just like hates what we stand for and hates our race. The majority of White people know that something’s pretty fucked up, they’re just too weak. It’s not that they’re all, … I think it’s only maybe 20% of Whites that are actually mentally fucked into like full on racial self hatred.

The vast majority of Whites are just scared. They’re just scared of the ramifications of embracing our position. They’re scared of the status quo crumbling and polarisation and conflict. And so they’re just trying to hold on to the security of their lives.

But this system is destroying and eroding that security year by year. It’s destroying the economy, it’s destroying the security of our streets. It’s rapidly replacing us, reducing us to a minority, discriminating against us at every level.

[1:11:29]

And so there’s like points at which it no longer makes any sense to keep trying to hold on to that semblance of middle class existence or that semblance of your personal advantage, because it’s all being ripped away from you anyway. And when we get to that point there’s going to be a mass exodus from, basically status quo, head down status to embracing a radical nationalist position. And the system knows that and it’s kind of preparing and it’s trying to hold us back as much as it can because it’s trying to ram through our replacement as quickly as possible.

Because if it can reduce us to a small enough minority before you react, maybe it can beat us when we do finally react. But if we’re still 50% of the population and we get organised and we fight back, they’re done! Even if we’re 40%, they’re done. We’ll still win!

But they have to really whittle us down before we react. They have to basically outnumber us by a very large extent. And they know that, at the top level. These are like middle management people don’t really think like that, it’s more subconscious. But at the top level I think they understand that.

That would explain why like when I went with the boys, like there was only like 10 of us to Independence Day at the shrine for the Independence Day ceremony. Sorry, not Independence Day, Remembrance Day, for the Remembrance Day ceremony at the War memorial shrine on the 11th of November. There’s 11 of us there. We were completely silent. We’re just standing there listening to the speeches and the songs and watching the marches and then we were surrounded by police, filmed by the media, they put out:

“Nazis were at the Remembrance Day!”

And it was like a national security incident that 11 of us went to a public event. And it’s like, why are they so afraid of us? Like we put 20 guys, we go to the steps of Parliament with, 20 guys and we do a speech. Gotta raid my house! We’ve gotta like:

“We’ve got to change all these laws!”

It’s this like huge deal. Why? Like, why are you so afraid? The only reason they could plausibly be afraid is because they know that we’re representing potentially a mass movement that could arise at some point in the future.

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it scarier to live in silence and fear for the sake of some wage slave job, than it is to experience some sort of, as they call it, “consequence”, which is really just being freed from that slavery, just for speaking the truth! To me, it’s scarier to stay silent for the sake of a job. That’s a scarier way to live to me. I’d rather die than live that, man! Fuck that! How do people choose that lifestyle?:

“Well, I can’t say what I really think or I might lose my job!”

Who gives a fuck if you lose your job? I mean:

“Oh my God, I got my mortgage and my bills to pay!”

You’ll figure it out. You’ll get another job. You always figure it out.

And if you go to jail, who cares, man? You go to jail for hate speech. You know, jail is a holiday, yeah? You get your own bed, your own shower, your own writing desk, your own sink to brush your teeth in. It’s not like you watch on TV and you’re in a shower with like 50 other guys and someone’s going to stab you in the shower or something like that doesn’t happen in Australia. Jail’s a fucking holiday! I miss jail!

There’s very little deterrence for me to stop speaking because if I go to jail for something I say, like, I’m going to relax in there, it’s going to be a holiday. I’ll get so much reading done, all I’ll do is read, keep practicing guitar and exercise and I’ll come out so clear headed.

God, man, I came out so clear minded the first time I went to jail. I didn’t watch TV for like seven months. I unplugged my TV and refused to watch it. And you know what’s interesting? When I got out after seven months of not watching TV or not looking at any screens, I tried looking at a screen again. My friend was playing like a Nintendo 64. Went to visit my friend. I was watching Mario Karts. I couldn’t watch it for longer than two minutes because my eyes were burning. My eyes were that pained by looking at that screen because I hadn’t seen a screen in seven months. It makes you wonder how much damage to our eyes the daily exposure to screens does. Like, I feel like my eyes are getting more fucked up by the day, especially looking to these fucking studio lights. Yeah.

The point is that you’ve got nothing to fear, really. What are they going to take from you? You’re like, wage slavery situation, who cares? I mean, I suppose the only really worrying thing is if you have a family.

Look, I don’t want to get into this actually, because it doesn’t actually matter what I say to the average punter. They’re not going to suddenly become a ballsy public speaker because the average person isn’t psychologically geared to do that.

So there’s no real point in me criticising people for trying to play it safe, because the masses have always tried to play it safe. That’s kind of what they’re genetically geared to do, more so now than ever, probably. But throughout history, for the last. 2,000 years, that’s what they’ve done. And so obviously, we need to adjust our message, our programme to the receptivity of the masses, which is feminine by nature.

So I’m not going to stand here and give some instructional speech about how to be more like me, because it’s never going to happen. Right? You’re never going to see more people like me. We’re a dying breed. But I gotta say that from my point of view, it’s much scarier to obey, much scarier to lose the essence of who I am for the sake of a wage, for the sake of not getting in trouble. Like, that’s much more frightening.

[1:17:16]

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, obviously organising in nationalism comes with certain risks. Like many people have been fired from their jobs and so on. But like you said:

“You can get a new job.”

But I don’t want to play that down. I mean, that’s obviously, particularly if you built up in a certain industry and you’re specialised in a career path and that gets ripped away from you, that can be quite devastating!

And yeah I’m not afraid of going to jail if I have to because of the tyranny that I live under for simply trying to exercise my political activities. I don’t want to go to jail. I want my freedom! But if that has to happen, because, you know that’s the penalty for doing political activism, so be it. I’m not going to stop doing my political activism because of that. Particularly the kind of jail sentences that we’re looking at potentially are going to be quite short, like a matter of months, not years. Going to jail for like five years or seven years or something, like what some of the British dissidents are doing though, that’s horrible!

I mean, that’s really like ruining your life or not ruining your life, but it’s really like taking away a very substantial portion of your life. And particularly if you got kids or something, like, that’s disastrous.

So I’m not like enthused about that by any means, but at the same time if that’s the sacrifices that we have to make, we have to make it. Like, what’s the alternative? We just have our country stolen from us and we just don’t stand up and resist? That’s just unconscionable!

So it’s like, yeah, like sacrifices need to be made. But every nation is forged on the basis of sacrificial love. Like when we say that we are a nation of blood, I don’t just mean like ancestry by blood, it means that. But it also means the blood of sacrifice of the men who actually fought to defend our nation in various wars. And that’s true for every nation. There are no nations on this planet that weren’t forged in blood of both sacrifice and ancestry.

And like I mentioned the shrine in Melbourne, which is an incredible building, and I was there the other day, and the four pillars of the shrine, or at the four pillars of the shrine, which is basically, by the way, for those who don’t know, in Melbourne we have a War Memorial shrine which looks like a Greco-Roman temple. Literally looks like a Greco-Roman temple. It is literally a temple to the ancestors. And there’s four pillars with statues on them. And they have like certain characteristics that embody certain themes.

And one of them is a kind of goddess, kind of looking woman sitting on a throne holding a crown of thorns. Because sacrifice is like one of the four pillars that holds up a nation. That’s the idea.

I can’t remember what all the other three were off the top of my head right now, but I remember staring at that and taking that in. Because the temple has a lot of pagan, you would say, like, characteristics. There’s some Christian things too.

And obviously that notion of sacrificial love is very foundational to Christianity because it’s embodied in Christ. And that’s what that crown of thorns is obviously signifying, right.

And it reminded me of a paper by Gotlib Freger, who was a analytical philosopher from Germany. I think he died in the 1920s. But he was an incredible philosopher. Like he was probably the greatest logician or the most advanced. Like he created the most advances in logic since Aristotle.

And all of modern formal logic kind of spins out of Frege’s work as well as the whole analytical School of philosophy. And Frege, he was a German, and so most of his work is about logic and [word unclear].

But then he had a paper that was kind of obscure, that he wrote on theology, but it was on political theology. And he was writing this in the early 1920s. And basically he was advocating for National Socialism or Volkish Socialism, as you know, you would say in German. And what he was saying was that in the Weimar Republic you have like these two political positions, liberalism and socialism, which correspond to what Americans would say, conservative and liberal, I guess. Conservative really being liberal and what Americans call liberal really being like socialist.

But what he was saying was that where like socialism is a kind of narcissism and self interest of a class and I guess like contemporary Leftism, it’s the self interest of particular protected groups rather than the working class. It’s like blacks and Aboriginals and whatever, right? Women, gays. And liberalism or conservatism is about the kind of self interest of the individual. These are both basically nihilistic, materialistic, narcissistic worldviews that are purely self referential in terms of direct pleasures and the utilitarianism of your individuality or of your particular group.

Whereas what he said is necessary to actually build strength in a nation, is a higher ideal, a notion of God. A notion of a higher morality. And that Germans being as they are Christians, should look to the example of Christ. And in Christ you see what is the ultimate moral message, whether you’re a Christian or not, is that there is no greater love than laying one’s down one’s life for one’s friends.

And when you go into the temple, the shrine in Melbourne, there is the tomb of the Unknown Soldier in the middle of the temple. And it’s the sun, the light kind of shines in through the roof! It’s really quite beautiful. And there’s representations of military battles and stuff all over the walls and like beautiful tiling. And in the centre is the tomb of the Unknown Soldier. And it says something akin to like:

“No man hath love greater than this.”

Meaning, like, no man have love greater than laying down one’s life for one’s people.

[1:23:45]

And it’s very profound! Really moving whenever I’m in there. And I recommend if you haven’t been there and you’re ever in Melbourne or you from Melbourne in particular, go and see it. It’s an incredible thing! It was actually funded by the returned soldiers from World War I. It wasn’t actually even funded by the government. They got together and funded it and they built it. I think it was completed in the early 1930s. And it’s an incredible thing! Back when we were a real people and we still knew who we were, that’s the kind of thing that we built.

And if you look at the opening day, there’s like 300,000 people there for the first memorial service held at the shrine. And in those days the population of Melbourne couldn’t have been more than half a million people, maybe a million people, max. So 300,000 people showing up is like, almost everyone in Melbourne showing up for something. So it’s pretty incredible to think about.

But anyway, I got side-tracked.

But the point that I was making was that, yeah, like, sacrifice is really the foundation of the nation, and is really like, the highest form of love. And unless we can start to cultivate a spirit of being willing to embrace sacrifice, like, if nationalism just has to be easy, like, it’s just about ticking a box in a voting booth and watching a particular live stream or something, but you don’t ever have to actually give anything up, well, then we deserve to lose, because that’s fucking weak!

Like, we actually need thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of men willing to actually sacrifice shit! Not necessarily die, but like, sacrifice shit for saving our nation. And every nation ever that has ever been under threat has required this to survive.

And that’s probably the greatest fear that I have, that, like, we’ve become such pussies that we’ve lost touch with ourselves and with our sense of honour to such an extent that maybe there isn’t a hundred thousand Australians that are willing to actually sacrifice for our future? But I like to believe that there is, and there’s only going to be if we believe that there is and put our will into manifesting that as a reality!

Blair Cottrell: Very well said. This has been one of those streams where I’m like, what did I even say? [chuckling] Like, I was just so pissed off from the beginning that I don’t even know what I was talking about. So forgive me if I haven’t made as much sense as I usually do. But I’ve got to go eat.

Joel Davis: You made plenty of sense to me.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we’re part of the hive mind, right? I’m only paraphrasing stuff that you already think anyway. But I need to go eat, so I’m done. Have we got some Superchats? Do you want to quickly wrap that up? What do you want to do? I’m hungry.

Joel Davis: Yes, there’s probably some Superchats. And I should mention as well, I think I’m supposed to record, I did a few podcasts this week. Like I went on Elijah Schaffer’s most recent show. You can see that on the Slightly Offensive Rumble channel, among other places. He had me on the second half of the show. It was pretty good. Also went on Lucas Gage’s stream. So you can go check those out. If you haven’t seen them, you can find Lucas Gage on Rumble as well.

And I’m supposed to record with Jake Shields next week. I don’t know when that will be released. But so that should be interesting. I’ve never done a podcast with Jake Shields before, but it should be pretty cool! So a few things in the works. I don’t know if you have anything coming up or, …

Blair Cottrell: Nah, man. I’ve been chasing clients and money around for the last week because I’ve been a bit behind in that stuff, but there’s some stuff I won’t even mention it. I won’t even mention it live on stream.

But yeah, if you keep an eye on my Telegram channel, I’ll keep you guys up to date with what’s happening from my end.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I know you’re working on a few projects at the moment, behind the scenes. But yeah, we don’t have to talk about it till they’re ready to go.

Anyway, let’s get into Superchat. So Sig Kyle said:

“Keep fighting the good fight. A little bit of cash to go towards the Avi Yemini deportation steamboat.”

That’s [chuckling] pretty funny! Fellow Comrade said:

“Bhutanese came into work the other day and his wide alien like face made my flight or fight response get activated automatically. You’re not alone, Blair.”

So, Fellow Comrade’s vibing. He’s vibing the sentiment.

What else have we got here? The Gump, he said:

“You are setting the direction for our resistance all around the world. White power!”

Well, I mean, that’s a pretty hefty compliment, but I appreciate it. Racist Aristocrats said:

“The absolute state of Sam Newman video that Blair made was absolutely fantastic! I can see it being viewed by future Aryan generations as a concise historical window into the fallen Boomers and the resulting time of rebirth. Hope Sam watches and reflects.”

Well, yeah, Blair’s been knocking out the park with those short videos lately. [words unclear]

[1:29:12]

Blair Cottrell: Pardon?

Joel Davis: The way that you do your videos, it reminds me of like old school YouTube. When like those short videos on YouTube were very popular, people still kind of went out, …

Blair Cottrell: That’s kind of what I learnt from. That was my era. So I suppose, …

But yeah, that was just the opportunity, as I said, it was an opportunity to summarize and demonstrate what’s kind of going on behind the curtain of media because it’s kind of come out in full view for everybody to witness. I couldn’t really pass up the opportunity. I felt bad for Sam Newman and I didn’t want to throw any more dirt on him. So I tried not to throw dirt on him, but it was hard not to be because I had to expose the whole situation for what it was, which was a complete farce!

But yeah, like I enjoy working on those videos. I seem to get like over stimulated and hyper focused on them when I’m working on them. A fair bit of work goes into those videos even though they seem slapped together. You know, you got to write out kind of a rough script of what you’re going to say, then you’ve got to find the content to provide some sort of basis for what you’re saying so you can show people what you’re referring to while you’re talking about it.

Then you’ve got to dictate the video, you’ve got to speak to the camera and then you have to like edit all that together, which takes hours. So I’m glad those videos are appreciated because they do tend to be a bit labourious.

But yeah, that’s what I enjoy doing.

Joel Davis: And it’s what get reposted a lot. Like people are reposting them on Twitter, they’re getting big views, people are reposting them on YouTube, getting big views on YouTube as well. So thanks to everyone who’s doing the re-uploading because obviously Blair and myself are pretty much banned from every social media site except Rumble and Telegram at this point.

So yeah, but like the re-uploads hundreds of thousands of views on some of those videos you put out lately, each. So great, great reach for someone who’s still banned.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And that’s kind of alludes to the strategy we need to develop or have somewhat already developed as to how to get around that censorship on a community level. Because we have a lot of people we network with in the community and certain characters with pretty big accounts or accounts that are capable of reaching what was our audience or part of our audience.

So there’s always ways around censorship. There’s ways around all of the quote, unquote, “consequences” and the what we have to experience under this rigged system. So there’s still hope. There’s always hope.

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, also people who clip the show, I appreciate everything that you do. Please keep doing your work. There’s some guys on TikTok that clip the show and get really good views I’ve seen. And there might be others. I just haven’t even seen them because I don’t actually have a TikTok account or even have the app downloaded because I find it insufferable to scroll through. But sometimes people send me:

“Oh, hey, I saw this on TikTok. It’s someone’s uploaded a clip from one of your streams or whatever.”

So I appreciate people doing that on Instagram as well. I get sent stuff sometimes, I see stuff on X.

So yeah, what we’re going to start doing in the future though is probably professionalizing. And it was a great strategy that was employed by people like Nick Fuentes, Andrew Tate, when they were basically banned from everything where clips of their content was getting spread around very effectively by their fan base. And we need to replicate that, because the issue was not the content. Like I remember when Blair made a TikTok early 2023, sometime around there, when we, not long after we started doing the show. And you made like four videos just on your phone, like they weren’t even edited, they were just like you with a webcam, just giving your thoughts on something for a minute or two. And you got like 2 million views in a week and they banned your TikTok! So like, it’s not like we, …

Blair Cottrell: What we’re dealing with is. The reality that we’re faced with is we would be among the most popular and most viewed political commentators in the country were it not for this censorship. So instead we just sit in these little corners and do these little streams or make our little videos and hope that people share them. But if we got the same treatment, if we were treated fairly the way everybody else is, the way everybody who’s not White is, then yeah, we would be significantly more influential than we currently are. But I suppose that’s the point in rigging the system against us. Right? To make sure we can’t acquire the sort of influence that we would otherwise organically have.

[1:34:00]

Joel Davis: Yeah, but we still have organically, a lot of influence, and we will continue to do so. And what’s happened to us in terms of censorship is just a roadblock. But these roadblocks have been thrown up in front of us before, and we keep adapting. And working ways around them. It’s a skill issue. And we have the skills to adapt. And we will. And we already are to some extent, but we will this year. This year is going to be a year of adaptation.

And that’s what kind of happens in politics. Every time in politics or in dissident or oppositional politics, whenever you start having some success, you get punished because basically the enemy starts prioritizing, sabotaging you much higher than it previously did. And so successful, oppositional or revolutionary or dissident politics, whatever, however you want to describe it, requires having the ability to be adaptive. And we’ve been adaptive before, and we’re going to be adaptive again, and we’re going to continue this momentum.

But that’s not too many Superchats tonight. So that’s basically. Oh, no, wait, we got one here from the Alabama Hammer saying:

“Greetings from California lads. White power! So much of the early White nationalists in the US circa 2015-2016, found their beginnings in Southern California. Love the fitness and training you promote, Blair.”

Well, just bigging up California for some reason. But, yeah, there was one more, too, from Tmax. You want to read it?

Blair Cottrell: Sends 50 bucks. He says:

“Hitler is the father of the Great Awakening. To those who are asleep, cowardness will [not] save you.”

What? Can you make sense of that?

Joel Davis: I don’t know why he wrote “cowardness.” It’s cowardice. But thanks for the Superchat, Tmax.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, thanks for the 50 bucks, bro. But I’m gonna go eat dinner, man. I’m gonna go eat dinner. I’m hungry. Thanks, everyone, for tuning in. Sorry I was in a bad mood, but, hey, hope I was entertaining.

Joel Davis: No need to apologise, I think everyone likes the Blair rants. I do anyway.

[1:36:15]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/15/2025 = 129)

HyperChat min: 100

@Clyde
13 hours ago
clip and share Joel’s stuff – Joel is getting so much flack because he’s on target – roadblock to W

4
0
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
4 hours ago
he’s over the target.

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
you are both good

3
0

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago
84 people currently watching, only 23 likes. Hit the like button you tight cunts.

3
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago
their only safety is keeping society functioning, if society breaks down and comfort levels drop, they will be fucked.

2
0
ChainReaction
13 hours ago
pretty sure that’s what he meant

1
1
ChainReaction
13 hours ago
*cowardice will NOT save you

4
1
Hide replies
Brittany Venti Enjoyer
5 hours ago
Piss off back to nnr faggot

@SammichLubber
13 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
We can come up with some bs ngo.

2
0

@SammichLubber
13 hours ago
Get yourselves some USAID funding.

2
0
Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
I’ve said it before, but you have to gain the support of the wife’s and girlfriends, they won’t have a nazi man and they must be convinced,

2
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago
manpower is a must to be able make moves without being persecuted.

2
0
ChainReaction
14 hours ago
try listening to Blairs point

1
1
Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
JoelBlairLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

1
0
Matt Hammond
13 hours ago
Yeah, the Blair rant was funny…because I can sympathise

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago

@ChainReaction
true

1
0
Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
It’s as Collett described, certain groups can act as individuals, it’s when they collectivise that there’s an issue

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
o/

1
0

@MichiganMan
13 hours ago
Bye

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago

@SammichLubber
it might actually work

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago

@SammichLubber
good idea

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago

@ChainReaction
lol

1
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago
that will never happen naturally.

1
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
probably.

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
deeds beget deeds : the Havamal . speech of the high one (Odin )

1
0
Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
Specialise in what interests you the most. As both hosts clearly have.

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
duty and sacrifice

1
0
Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
Branding, psychology and marketing are not there for nothing, just look at any successful organisation. Your brand is literally a jewish construct.

0
1
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Not a dying breed but as small percentage of every generation

1
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
i followed them at the time, although i was young i could already see how the country was being transformed. Both my grandparents were in the NSDAP.

1
0
Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
everyone involved in this demise is rubbing their hands because they have a target that’s justifying their power

1
0

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago

@DIEVAL
The actual founders of One Nation were OG Australian Nat Socs, Peter was even the leader of the Australian Ku Klux Klan.

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
If we reach 25 % we win

1
0
Matt Hammond
13 hours ago
I sympathise with the anger. It’s a very tough path. I can hardly imagine what it must be like on the front line. A huge burden to shoulder

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
13 hours ago
Question their grip on the ‘narritive’ you are all “far right” anyway, so there’s no winning…according to them!

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
13 hours ago
It’s hard not to be angry all the time

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
13 hours ago
Charity boxing match with Avi, will remedy that Blair!

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
13 hours ago
They all know what the truth is, but refuse to admit to it, for that will destroy their end goals!

1
0
ChainReaction
13 hours ago
“The only people who know what’s going on are jews and antisemites.”

2
1
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Joel is right here, it is happening right now on the judge Napolitano channel

1
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago
only true way for that fact to become reality is to get mass audience. Capture the Signal….!

1
0
DIEVAL
13 hours ago
those faggots couldn’t debate any of us, only need 2 brain cells rubbing together to beat those shitskin muppets.

1
0
DIEVAL
14 hours ago
we’re terrorist in our own countries whether we like it or not. Whether we’re affiliated with any “movement” or not. Solution!? Capture the signal.

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
14 hours ago
This is how they create ‘false flags’

1
0
DIEVAL
14 hours ago
i have a video of Jews sniping our soldiers in Iraq just to destabilize and create chaos!

1
0
Hide replies
danzimmons
11 hours ago
Can you post it or have you already, i tell people about that all the time because it’s been suppressed so gud, id like to see it Thx

DIEVAL
14 hours ago
we have a mountains of evidence to line up the Jews into a volcano of justice 6 million times over.

1
0
DIEVAL
14 hours ago
Blair and Sowell on the Sam show were quite tame considering how demonic these kikes are.

1
0
Carnegie
14 hours ago
Excellent edit

1
0
ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
Thomas Sewell o/

1
0
DIEVAL
14 hours ago
we can’t even make it on the chessboard, let alone move any pieces around to even play the game. Guys like Avi Yemeni are nothing more than organised gatekeepers! There are solutions but none of them are political! o/

1
0

@Vidkun
14 hours ago
They are called the Kosher right. Controlled opposition.

1
0

@ItWasMadeUp
14 hours ago
The ‘signal boosting’ thing is true but also an excuse not to engage with us. If they thought they would win, they would use the larger platform to publically defeat you, but they know they would lose.

1
0
ThinRedLine
13 hours ago

@SammichLubber
Morning

@SammichLubber
13 hours ago
Morning folks.

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago

@DIEVAL
Most probably a child rapist also.

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
Avi the child sniper! pft!

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
please deport Avi

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
one day we may be able to open up a mainstream slot for you guys! haha! o/

DIEVAL
13 hours ago

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
yes i do, it was a huge eye opener for me. Many questions were sought in the aftermath.

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
sounds like a great place

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago

@DIEVAL
As was I. Do you remember when the jews doxxed every single member? They published all their names and addresses in the major papers. Literally thousands upon thousands of names and address over several pages.

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
to paganism as well

@Anna1913
14 hours ago
sure not hard to guess the most protected are the predator

1
0

@Anna1913
14 hours ago
jews frame the white as the predator so white dont need protection their excuse

1
0
Carnegie
14 hours ago
Ai would rather murder 6million white babies than harm one hair on a jews head.

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
14 hours ago
They lead the way in creating ‘false flags’ then claim top victim

1
0
ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
Judaism is organized crime

1
0
eternal extrapolations
6 hours ago
31:10
“Because Shared Values!”
Yes, I think we’re done with these supposed “shared values” now.

JamesL
7 hours ago
Washing the car whilst listening to your discussion on catchup! Our people have become so deracinated; as you say

@joeldavis
our forebears have had to step up and defend our people – the Memorial in Melbourne is def something I will visit when next over. I met you at the PA conf in England in 2023 and

@BlairCottrell
recently in 2024 – your appearance on Sam Newman’s show with Thomas was epic

Keep up the good work over there.

danzimmons
10 hours ago
Caramel honey’s lol

ChainReaction
13 hours ago
Less

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
based

@Helmet
13 hours ago
It could be worse. You could be cypriot.

Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
The Australian day March demonstrated this, there was the no rimes and there was you. They can’t get their heads around it. If you looked like them and moved with them, the media would have condemned the whole crowd and they wouldn’t do that.

Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
Decades of Americans have fallen out of popularity because they went the nazi optics. The governments literally burnt them alive and there was no backlash. your competing with decades of nazi propaganda and trigger words. We don’t have the time that has taken them to indoctrinate the masses.

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
Pauline has a Jew in her party. Her jail time was about selling out and becoming an insider.

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
^^^ Yeah now…..

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago
Pauline is a piece of shit. The original founders of the one nation party were very, very based. I’m not even sure that Joel or Blair even know who they were.

Cone of Silence
13 hours ago
It’s a numbers game Joel,, you’ll never reach a critical mass as long as you are the meme.

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
never adhere to being a “NAZI”, derogative term acceptance is a no, no.

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Third position is the best regardless

@Vidkun
13 hours ago
I also find it hard to counterbalance the anger/hate.

Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
Woodlander Initiative/ AusLander Initiative. Raus.

@Helmet
13 hours ago
Sam broke you

@Helmet
13 hours ago
Sun your balls

Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
Blair just wants to grill?

@Helmet
13 hours ago
Bro go outside and get some sun ffs

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Imagine the smell

@The_Eagle_Has_Landed
13 hours ago
Blair move into the country, it’s comfy here. No jeets no chinks no brownoids

@Ir0nW1LL
13 hours ago
Yes

Matt Hammond
13 hours ago
Ha ha. I hate the summer heat too…

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
a striker quote

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Blair is right

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
That is true

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
Nationalism is invetitable

@Ir0nW1LL
14 hours ago
If Avi won’t debate, perhaps he’d agree to a charity boxing match?

Dawn Browning
14 hours ago
Catching up. Case in point re bullying white hetero boys was Parkdale High School 2021.

Dawn Browning
14 hours ago
Lay

ChainReaction
14 hours ago
learn to vote, Aussies
https://x.com/QBCCIntegrity/status/1876502687245897849

@Ir0nW1LL
14 hours ago
He knows full well what his comment section would reflect!

@Anna1913
14 hours ago
any surprises, we can read the past always like that

@Vidkun
13 hours ago
Please don’t do anything stupid, Blair. xD

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
Man is the animal who can run the furthest, because of our ability to sweat

Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
lol, it’s a cool evening

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
We got the ability sweat

Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
Liam Neeson did that

ThinRedLine
13 hours ago
we can’t be converted

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
you cunts need to do call ins….!

Channel
13 hours ago
I watched it at time o/

Dawn Browning
13 hours ago
Ricardo in his army kit

DIEVAL
13 hours ago
Ricardo Bosi is a gatekeeper period!

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
they do business

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
Rabbis at it

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago

@kong
sounds great o/

M88
14 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
nearly 1933

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
thx

@sieg
14 hours ago
pm

@sieg
14 hours ago
8:35

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
What time is it in Australia ?

@sieg
14 hours ago
Lets get started

ThinRedLine
14 hours ago
G’day Aussies

@sieg
14 hours ago
Good day gents

@katana17
15 hours ago
[Sam Newman – Main Stream Push Back With Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell – Feb 3, 2025 – Transcript]

Sam Newman – Main Stream Push Back With Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell – Feb 3, 2025 – Transcript

Dawn Browning
16 hours ago
Share the link and/ or a screenshot.

JamesL
16 hours ago
gidday all from England

DanTheOracle
16 hours ago
o/

DanTheOracle
16 hours ago
Hello lads

0
0

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 17310

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3: Fri, Feb 21, 2025 — Transcript completed = 96/96 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 2: Tue, Feb 18, 2025 — Transcript completed = 76/96 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Mon, Feb 17, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 39/96 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee comments (129).

Sam Newman – Main Stream Push Back With Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell – Feb 3, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Sat, 08 Feb 2025 07:59:43 +0000

Sam Newman

Main Stream Push Back

With Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell

Mon, Feb 3, 2025

[In this pre-recorded episode of the You Can’t Be Serious, Sam Newman (born 1945) a well-known former Australian Rules footballer interviews Aussie nationalist activist, leader of National Socialist Network, Tom Sewell and fellow nationalist Blair Cottrell.

Blair and Tom discuss why non-Whites in Australia need to leave and a new version of the White Australian Policy needs to be installed.

Some further discussion points:

Thomas Sewell and Blair Cottrell are introduced as representatives of White supremacy / Nazism in Australia.

Thomas states “I believe that Adolf Hitler was the greatest man of the 20th century”.

They dispute the Holocaust, calling it a “trillion dollar industry”.

They express admiration for Hitler’s revival of German national spirit.

Thomas identifies as “counter-Semitic”.

They discuss a recent incident involving explosives found in an abandoned caravan near Sydney, suggesting it may have been staged.

They admit to giving Nazi salutes in the past but say they’ve stopped since it was made illegal.

Elon Musk’s “Roman” salute.

Thomas argues White people “deserve a home” and that Australia should be for White people.

Blair states “I think White people deserve a home. Collectively, they have a home, we don’t have one.”

They express opposition to multiculturalism and mass immigration.

Thomas says “Why should Australians have to compete with everybody else in the world for a house in Australia?”

They argue for deporting non-White immigrants:

“A lot of people need to go home”.

Blair states “I think all countries that are in existence are created through force” regarding Australia’s colonization.

They discuss their views on Aboriginal Australians, suggesting they should “govern themselves” separately.

Thomas describes membership criteria for their National Socialist Network.

Blair confirms “You have to be White” and “You can’t be a homosexual” to join.

They claim to have “thousands of supporters” and about 250 active members.

Thomas says “We’re a global movement of nationalists”.

Blair argues “Every White country is losing their homeland”.

They discuss potentially running for political office in the future.

Blair reiterates “We need representation for White Aussies”.

They express admiration for Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

Blair argues against the concept of hate speech:

“What is hate speech other than speech that people in power don’t like?”

Thomas recounts an altercation with a black security guard, re “dance monkey”.

Newman says that George Floyd was a “piece of shit”.

And more, …

– KATANA]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5ZwNhJ1vEA

https://odysee.com/@Thomas_Sewell:e

Published on Mon, Feb 3, 2025

Description

Ep 293 – Part 5 – Main Stream Push Back
You Cannot Be Serious
2.23K subscribers
Subscribe
2.3K
Share
28,338 views
Feb 3, 2025 #classiccars #trucks #meditation
Sam Newman spoke to two self declared white supremacists. The interview was to expose the radical views of a disparate group. With all the publicity surrounding their appearances, it was thought it would be an intriguing chat.
This is strictly nonpartisan.
#samnewman #poscast #youcannotbeseriouspodcast #youcannotbeserious #interview #world #politicalnews #media #automobile #sport #sports #vlog #vlogger #vlogging #vlogs #travel #travlevlog #cooking #friends #meditation #spirituality #trucks #supercars #classiccars #entertainment
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
You Cannot Be Serious
2.23K subscribers
Videos
About
1,823 Comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 10,778 – Duration: 53 mins)

You can’t be serious, man. You cannot be serious!

[00:05]

Sam Newman: Well, now. Well, now, I’ll probably take a kicking for doing this, but that’s why I’m doing it. Because we speak to people of interest. And I don’t think you could get any more interest than these two people sitting opposite me for probably the wrong reasons, but it doesn’t matter. Everyone has a story and we’d like to know what it is, as unpalatable as it may be to some.

But in front of me is Thomas Sewell and Blair Cottrell. And they seem to be the face, for want of a better word, “Nazism” in Australia or the face of “White supremacy”.

And they’ve been in court in Adelaide on Australia Day. And I thought, this is extraordinary. They look like two presentable people to me. And they might think I’m not too presentable, but I’d like to know what’s going on in the back of their mind, in the front of their mind, and what they do this for and who they are and how they started.

Can I ask you this first? Can I ask you this first, Thomas? You’ll love this question. Are you a debutant, or a fan of Hitler?

Thomas Sewell: I believe that Adolf Hitler was the greatest man of the 20th century.

Sam Newman: And why? Because he tried to wipe out the jews?

Thomas Sewell: Well, we can get into that.

Sam Newman: No, we can, but, …

Thomas Sewell: I’ll answer the question first and then we can discuss the Holocaust specifically at this.

But I would like to answer the question without the Holocaust being on the table to start with. Because I believe that the Holocaust is disputed, I don’t believe that it’s true. I think it’s a trillion dollar industry that’s been running for too long. That is just to start with. But to answer the question, …

Sam Newman: At this stage, Paul, at this stage, Thomas. Sorry. I probably should stop this interview. We probably should finish this now.

Thomas Sewell: Why?

Sam Newman: No, people will say:

“Well, if that is your attitude and that is the person you look up to, we probably shouldn’t go on with this.”

But this makes me go on with it even more. So, …

Thomas Sewell: I think we need to have an honest conversation about World War II. I think we need to have an honest conversation about Adolf Hitler. And if I’m wrong, then I think the media should be honest and prove where what I’ve said is incorrect.

[See: Adolf Hitler — A Short Sketch of His Life – Part 1]

My appreciation of Adolf Hitler is quite simple. I believe that Germany was destroyed in the 1920s, and I believe that it took a great man to revitalise the German national spirit. I think Australia is facing the same, and the Western world, the whole White Western world is facing the same set of circumstances as Weimar Germany was facing in the 1920s. And we’re facing that in the 2000s. And I think what we need is a revival in our national spirit!

So it’s not necessarily Hitler as an individual that I think we need to revive, but I think he had a very clear political strategy, a very clear spiritual meaning to the German people.

And I think that if Australia has a love of its own folk, we can survive and not just survive, but we can thrive. We can rebuild the Australian dream and create greatness here in this land.

Sam Newman: So I’ve been to Dachau. What would you say to people who say that Hitler himself, through his acolytes, burnt and incinerated millions of jews in the name of ethnic cleansing, if you like? You’re disputing that?

[See: The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies]

Thomas Sewell: I dispute it because the history, the proven history that we have, not jewish Hollywood and mythology, is that, …

Sam Newman: I’ve seen, people have seen, …

Thomas Sewell: You might have seen piles of shoes and if you went to, …

Sam Newman: No, I’ve seen piles of bodies, people being shot in pits. From the, …

Thomas Sewell: I don’t believe in the 6 million number. Certainly there were people that were killed and there was a Einsatzgruppen* and there was a anti-partisan task force in the SS that was devised to hunt down and kill people that were committing war crimes against the German army. So they were dressed as civilians.

[* Q:What role did the Einsatzgruppen play in the German war effort?

Ans: Because the fight between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany was a largely ideological one, and the Soviet Union was not a signatory of Geneva Convention agreements on the conduct of war, it was rightly assumed by Hitler that the Soviets would not fight by the rules. The Einsatzgruppen were police units assigned to the pacification of occupied territories in the east. Their duties included fighting anti-German partisan guerrillas, shooting captured communist ‘commissars’ and executing civilians in reprisal for acts of murder and sabotage committed by the guerrillas. Ref: Butz; Staeglich; Klee]

[See: Holocaust Revisionism — Frequently Asked Questions]

Regarding gas chambers, I think history will prove that that is a falsity, created by a narrative. Regarding the burning of bodies. There wasn’t enough crematorium ovens to burn 6 million bodies, and they’ve actually revised the original Auschwitz number from four and a half down to one and a half down to 1.1. And now they’re saying that maybe they can prove 250,000 died here. But the math still doesn’t add up.

So I don’t really want to come on the show to talk about the Holocaust.

Sam Newman: No! I don’t!

Thomas Sewell: I don’t really want to talk about the Hitler. But, what I want to talk about is Australia. That’s why I came on. Obviously it’s impossible to avoid the conversation of Hitler because we are nationalists and we’re National Socialists.

Sam Newman: So you’re anti-semitic?

Thomas Sewell: I’m counter-semitic. Yeah, absolutely!

Sam Newman: You’re anti-the jews?

Thomas Sewell: I think the individual jew, I don’t have much of a concern for them. I don’t really.

Sam Newman: But that is, …

Thomas Sewell: Anti-semitism for me is I believe that there is an alien spirituality, an alien political position that is antithetical to our survival as Western civilisation. I don’t believe that Western civilisation was built alongside jews. I think jews have been from the very beginning antagonistic. I think they open the gates of Toledo, they open the gates of Constantinople, they open the gates of Vienna and they allowed Muslim, …

[05:35]

Sam Newman: Plenty of people are antagonistic, but that’s taking it to a whole new level. The world is full of antagonistic people and countries.

Thomas Sewell: It is.

Sam Newman: So they just found a caravan in New South Wales [chuckling] loaded with explosives with a view, …

Thomas Sewell: I don’t advocate for terrorism, if that’s what you’re asking me. I don’t advocate for terrorism. What I want is a free and noble people! I want our country to be free and noble.

Sam Newman: And you want, …

Blair Cottrell: That caravan you mentioned though, that was discovered. That was a little bit suspicious, wasn’t it? That a caravan full of explosives, …

Sam Newman: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: Was discovered with the addresses of the targets written down on a piece of paper inside. It was all very convenient.

Sam Newman: So what are you saying about the caravan with full of explosives?

Blair Cottrell: I’m saying that there’s a lot of kicking and screaming in the jewish community, and they seem to be getting a lot of money. A special task force, and they are the primary beneficiaries of these threats, if you pay attention.

Sam Newman: So you’re not saying the jewish fraternity loaded the caravan up?

Blair Cottrell: I’m not saying that. I don’t have any proof of that. But what I’m saying is when something like this happens, you have to ask yourself, well, who stands to benefit?

Thomas Sewell: Cui bono. Who benefits?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, …

Thomas Sewell: So a good answer to your question as well is a lot of these anti-semitic attacks have been proven. And the AFP [Australian Federal Police] came out recently and stated that foreign agents are paying organised criminals to pay junkies to commit these anti-semitic attacks. No one in my organisation and no one in my extended community has spray painted synagogues or done anything silly like that. Because we don’t want to go down that path. That’s not what we’re interested in.

[See: The Noticer – Yes, they really do hate freedom (Part 1) FEBRUARY 10, 2025 – MITCH SUTTON]

But in the absence of us doing it’s either the Palestinians doing it, the Arabs and Palestinians, or it is what foreign government is paying organised crime to attack synagogues and why? Why are they paying people? And this is a fact, this isn’t my speculation, the AFP came out recently and said:

“Foreign governments are paying organised criminals to subcontract out anti-semitic attacks.”

So what does this have to do with me and my historical analysis of Western civilisation?

Sam Newman: So you gave a Nazi salute, did you not?

Thomas Sewell: Many times.

Sam Newman: Yes, many times.

Thomas Sewell: Many times. That is the Roman salute or the Nazi salute.

Sam Newman: Hang on! The Nazi salute, which is actually banned and considered, not hate speech because it’s not a speech. But you, …

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s a political gesture. It is a form of speech.

Sam Newman: Which has been banned by Western, …

Thomas Sewell: It’s being contested, but yes, …

Sam Newman: It is currently been banned. It’s illegal. But you do it anyhow because you’re by nature being anti-social.

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t done it since it’s been made illegal. That’s Jacob Hersant. He did it. He’s the only person to be arrested for doing so.

[See: The Noticer – Jacob Hersant facing a year in jail for political salute]

Sam Newman: You didn’t do it in the courthouse coming out of Adelaide?

Thomas Sewell: Oh, no, no, no! That footage that you’re seeing is from about two or three years ago.

Sam Newman: I see. So since they made it illegal, you’ve stopped doing the Nazi salute?

Thomas Sewell: I’m waiting to hear what the High Court decision is with Jacob Hersant’s case. So that judgement will decide whether we do it in the future.

Blair Cottrell: So there’s quite a few people who have been charged with doing it since that ban came into place, including our former Neighbours [Australian sit-com] star Damien Richardson, who gave the gesture satirically during a during a private venue speech.

So the law does need to be tested there, because when you’re going to be charging people for raising their arm a certain distance above their hip, that’s a little bit much!

Sam Newman: Elon Musk was accused of doing it, but of course. And there’s a difference, I think, whether it be palatable or not in comedy, black humour, you can do certain things if you are a comedic working comedically in front of an audience.

Blair Cottrell: Of course.

Thomas Sewell: But I don’t think Musk did it for comedy. I think he did it as a political expression of his excitement.

Sam Newman: No! Thomas, Musk didn’t do it. It had nothing to do with the Nazi salute.

Blair Cottrell: How do you know? Have you spoken to him?

Sam Newman: No, I haven’t spoken to him, but people have asked him, why wouldn’t he say, “yes, I was giving the Nazi salute”? He was, …

Thomas Sewell: We’re arguing semantics. Like, is it the Roman salute or is it the Nazi salute? Because he definitely gave a Roman salute. His gesture was Roman in nature. And he is appreciator of Roman history. He stated he likes Roman history.

Sam Newman: He’s a sympathizer of the jewish Holocaust, or the jewish, …

Thomas Sewell: I’d be if browbeaten by Netanyahu and taken to the museums. Yes, I did see that. I don’t know if he, …

Sam Newman: So what happens when someone hails a taxi and they throw out their hand in the absolute epitome of a Nazi salute?

Blair Cottrell: Exactly!

Thomas Sewell: Well, so that’s why it comes down to this is a “thought crime”, because the gesture itself isn’t what’s being made illegal, it’s the thoughts behind the gesture.

Sam Newman: But you do it. You both, …

Blair Cottrell: It’s not actually my style.

[10:15]

Sam Newman: So you give a Nazi salute in order to mean exactly what it meant, that you are a sympathizer of Hitler’s and his regime and what he was on about. And you would like that.

So Donald Trump was being accused by the Democrats during the four years of electioneering of being Hitler and being likened to Hitler. Do you take offence at that? Do you think Donald Trump’s what the Democrats said he was “a devotee of Hitler’s”?

Thomas Sewell: No. Donald Trump is a liberal, he believes in, …

Sam Newman: But he wants nationalism. He wants America First, like you want Australia.

Thomas Sewell: He wants parts of nationalism as a liberal, the way that we want parts of democracy and liberty as a nationalist.

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: So we all want parts of each other’s ideas.

I don’t believe in this political theory that everything is set 100% in stone, you can’t borrow ideas or thoughts from other groups.

Sam Newman: So someone like Donald Trump or someone on a level mental footing. Not saying you’re not on a level mental footing, but people you don’t want any coloured people of any skin colour other than White people to live in this country.

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big generalisation.

Sam Newman: Well, I’m asking you!

Blair Cottrell: We’ve jumped into the deep end with this conversation. I didn’t know we were going to start off with Hitler and the Holocaust!

Sam Newman: So, Blair, let’s pretend, …

Thomas Sewell: I want a home for White people.

Sam Newman: Let’s pretend we’ve just started this conversation.

Welcome, boys! Welcome! What question would you like me to ask you first up? Go ahead.

Blair Cottrell: Well, I thought we’d start the conversation with Australia Day. The controversy that led us here in the first place. And the fact that we’re Australians, we’re not Germans, and we’re representing an Australian brand of nationalism

Sam Newman: Unfortunately, you can’t see my notes. Let’s get into all that. All written down here, …

Thomas Sewell: I’m happy to do it in order. You’re the host.

Sam Newman: No, but I thought it would be good if people are watching this and listening to this, it would be nice to know that if you are a devotee or an admirer of Hitler’s, why?

Because that usually engenders a fair amount of angst among, …

Thomas Sewell: Why?

Blair Cottrell: Some.

Sam Newman: Usually. Well, you’re explaining why it doesn’t, and I’m saying, generally if you are a friend or admirer of Hitler’s, that doesn’t go over well.

Blair Cottrell: Hang on, let’s answer a general question with a general answer.

Sam Newman: Right, okay.

Blair Cottrell: Hitler’s a very significant figure in history.

Sam Newman: He is!

Blair Cottrell: And the guy made a lot of right decisions. He did a lot of good for Germany at the time. No one can dispute that. But he didn’t do everything right. If he did he would have one the war. There’s lessons to be learnt from Hitler. And some of those lessons we can incorporate into an Australian brand of nationalism, for the good of our country. And I think that is the general standpoint that we would take.

Sam Newman: So, this is where I should have started the interview?

Sam Newman: Let’s keep moving. Let’s keep the ball rolling.

Blair Cottrell: Is this a live interview, or is this recorded? I’m not really sure what we are doing here.

Sam Newman: No, this is pre-recorded. Does that matter?

Blair Cottrell: Not really. I would usually prefer it to be live, because it can be, …

Sam Newman: I can absolutely tell you! I give you my word. Hey mate!

Blair Cottrell: Let me say this too.

Sam Newman: No! Blair! Blair, …

Blair Cottrell: I think you would agree with us on most things. It’s just that perspective of World War Two.

Sam Newman: Blair, we are telling you this now, we have never editing anything, …

Blair Cottrell: I’m not accusing you of that.

Sam Newman: No, you said you would like to do it live, …

Blair Cottrell: Some journalists, …

Sam Newman: Hang on! I’m not some journalist. And I’m not a journalist. We’ve never edited anything other than saying, “I’m not sure you should say that for libel or slander purposes.” So we don’t want to get sued.

Blair Cottrell: Sure. Fair enough.

Sam Newman: We have taken two or three things out of one or two interviews we have done over five years. This is absolutely as we speak, so I’m just telling you that now. And if you were recording this on your phone you can play it back and when it goes to air you can see that I’m just telling you that.

Blair Cottrell: Look you’ve given us a fair go, and I apprciate it. As I said before the show I grew up in 89, so I watched you on TV as a kid. Me and my dad thought you were good value.

Sam Newman: Good on you. So why are you so pre-occupied with, … We had a White Australian policy, here, back in the 40s.

Thomas Sewell: Until the 70s.

Sam Newman: What?

Thomas Sewell: Until the 70s.

Sam Newman: I think Harold Holt [a former Prime Minister] in 1966, or 1970? He decided, … Anyway, we had a White Australian policy. You would like that to be reinstated, would you?

Blair Cottrell: Do you feel that Australia was better back then than it is now?

Sam Newman: In what way?

[Image: Australia, aerial view of Sydney, 1960s]

Blair Cottrell: Nicer place to live, more manageable infrastructure, more manageable population. I could imagine in the 60s, not that I was alive back then. Australia probably was a nice place to live, and it’s probably a lot different now as a result of the people who are coming into this country, a lot of the time to exploit Australia.

Sam Newman: Yep.

Now, so having said that is just a pointless. It is really a pointless question to say, did I prefer to live in the 60s, because I did.

[Image: The Gold Coast, Queensland late 1960s meter maid]

Blair Cottrell: Well, you’re saying by default you preferred to live in a White Australia, because in the 60s, Australia was predominantly White.

Sam Newman: I didn’t say I preferred, I said it was, …

Blair Cottrell: Well, what’s the defining factor that separates the 60s from now?

Sam Newman: The fact that we have a cosmopolitan country of people pouring into it and hopefully they’re vetted! Bit like what Trump’s on about in America is that we vet the right people coming in and hopefully they contribute. You couldn’t say that Australia, … Would you say Australia is not the better for the multicultural society we live in?

Thomas Sewell: My main contention is that it is not better, that it is worse.

Sam Newman: And what would you like to do about it?

Thomas Sewell: I’d like to do a lot of things about it, …

Sam Newman: But it’s here now. There’s 25 million of us here and they’re from every country in the world!

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people need to go!

Sam Newman: Would you like to deport them?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people need to go home. There’s people that are in our country illegally.

Just recently, actually it was brought to light that there are some fake scam universities through which Indians are coming into our country. They’re signing up on these fake universities, which are actually just websites, …

Sam Newman: Yep.

Blair Cottrell: And they’re here legally on fake student visas. And that’s just what we know of! There’s a lot of scams beneath that we haven’t even figured out yet.

Sam Newman: So that’s not necessarily hoping that we’ll just have a White country. That’s hoping that we’ll send back people who are here illegally, no matter what skin colour they are.

Thomas Sewell: That’s how you start! That’s how you start. I think that’s the starting point that we can all agree on, is that people that have entered the country illegally should be deported. And we have to have the strength to do that. We have to have the strength to enforce laws! And if we don’t have the strength to enforce laws, then a home for everyone is a home for no one!

Sam Newman: Yeah, but so, …

[17:07]

Thomas Sewell: My most important contention is and my most, my biggest argument for what we want as a future, is a home, individually and collectively. Why? If you let me finish, Sam, because I can see you’re trying to interject.

Sam Newman: I haven’t interjected.

Thomas Sewell: I know. I’d appreciate, if I just get 30 seconds.

White people deserve a home! There’s 1.4 billion Chinamen, there’s 1.4 billion Indians, there’s a billion Africans, there’s a billion Arabs. And they’ve all got their own countries. Now if there was a White country on earth, I would, I don’t want to leave Australia! But if you said to me:

“Tom, why don’t you go live in Poland or Lithuania or Latvia or whatever?”

I would say:

“Look, it’s tempting, but I love Australia!”

It is tempting because I don’t like what’s happening to this country. I think White people deserve a home collectively. They have a home, we don’t have one! We’re being told that Australia is for everyone! And if it’s for everyone, then it’s for no one! That’s my position.

And second to that collectively, is individually. I individually cannot afford a home. My father bought a home on three years wages. I could not even buy a 200 square meter block of dirt in Parnee [sp] for three years wages. So I, because of the conditions the government has put our generation through, I and the people younger than me are getting locked out of the market. And when we do afford a home, like where I rent, where I can’t even afford where I rent, I take my child to the playground, Sam, and every single other child at the playground is speaking a foreign language to their parents!

My child is the only child at the playground that’s speaking English. And I’m surrounded by people that are being told:

“Oh, this is a great multicultural diversity!”

And it just means less White people, less White culture. And ultimately we’re going to turn into global South Africa.

[See: How Africans May Differ from Westerners]

And I will fight to stop that from happening, Sam! I don’t want us to turn into South Africa. I had family in Rhodesia, I had family in South Africa. I’m not letting it happen here!

And so I’m trying with all my might to be peaceful and reasonable and political. But we have to protect White Australia. We have to!

Blair Cottrell: Was there ever a point in the past where there was some democratic process, like maybe a referendum on multiculturalism? Were the people ever asked? I’m asking you’ve been around a bit longer than me.

Sam Newman: Don’t ask me anything, mate. You speak for as long as you like.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t believe there was.

Sam Newman: When you’re finished, I’ll ask you a question, because I don’t want to interrupt you.

Thomas Sewell: No, no, I’m finished.

Sam Newman: Sure you’re finished? Go ahead, Blair.

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it’s important again to ask yourself, who are the beneficiaries of multiculturalism and mass migration between 2024, I think, and, 2025 this year, or maybe it was 23 and, 24, 1.1 million migrants arrived in Australia in a single year. Okay, that’s record numbers never seen before in the history of Australia. Predominantly from India and China. And predominantly the reason this happens is to enrich the financial sector.

You’ve got big property developers like Harry Triguboff*, who’s building tens of thousands of homes out in the swamplands. Cookie cutter homes that standard Australians wouldn’t want to live in, right? And he’s making bank from this immigration. And guess what? He also lobbies the major political parties.

[* Harry Oskar Triguboff is a jewish-Australian billionaire real estate developer, and one of Australia’s richest people. He is the founder and managing director of Meriton and is known as “high-rise Harry”. As of May 2023, The Australian Financial Review assessed Triguboff as the fourth richest Australian by net worth, estimated at A$23.80 billion, as published in the 2023 Rich List. Wikipedia]

So you can understand why it’s in the interests of certain people to be bringing more migrants into Australia.

So it’s not the Australians winning from this. We’re not benefiting. It’s not the average person getting more money in their pocket. People younger than me, they can’t afford to buy a house. So why? I’ll leave you this. Why should Australians have to compete with everybody else in the world for a house in Australia?

Sam Newman: Well, we’ve set a record. I haven’t spoken for three minutes, and that doesn’t usually happen.

Blair Cottrell: We can become somewhat impassioned!

Thomas Sewell: The floor is yours.

Blair Cottrell: We get somewhat, …

Sam Newman: No, please. No, Blair, please, keep going!

Blair Cottrell: Ask your next question, my friend. It’s yours now.

Sam Newman: Now, is the country not richer for all the European migration that’s come here over the years, the 25 million of us that are here?

Thomas Sewell: I believe it is richer for the Europeans.

Sam Newman: The Italians and the, …

Thomas Sewell: I believe it’s richer for the European migration.

Sam Newman: Is it?

Thomas Sewell: Yes, I believe so.

Sam Newman: As long as they’re White?

Thomas Sewell: Yes. White European. European.

Sam Newman: So.

Thomas Sewell: So I wouldn’t want Australia to turn into little Italy, but 5%, 10% Italian, I agree.

Sam Newman: As long as they’re White?

Thomas Sewell: They’re Europeans. Yes.

Sam Newman: Yeah.

Thomas Sewell: Greeks and Italians are Europeans.

Sam Newman: So you said that we should send back all those people who are here illegally. Illegal aliens, if you like.

So if there was some Americans and British and Canadians that were here, we’d send them home, as well as all the Indians that are here illegally as well, would we?

Blair Cottrell: We need to be focused on cultural similarity. Right? When we share certain cultural similarities with other people, then obviously integration and coexistence is much more probable. I mean, you only need to look at the situation in Queensland with Vyleen White* who was stabbed to death by an African refugee in a car park. And this is not an isolated incident. This is happening all over the country.

[* FEBRUARY 4, 2024 THE NOTICER-UPDATE: Police have released CCTV of four men of African appearance they believe may be able to assist them with enquiries. UPDATE 2: Video and images of the suspects removed after a 16-year-old male was charged with murder: A major manhunt is underway for an African man who stabbed an elderly woman to death during a robbery at a Queensland shopping centre. Vyleen White, 70, was stabbed in the chest at Town Square Redbank Plains Shopping Centre in Ipswich at 6.10pm on Saturday evening, in front of her six-year-old granddaughter. She was treated at the scene but was unable to be saved, while the young girl was assessed but not physically injured. The suspect, described by police as a male of African appearance, left his victim in a pool of blood and fled immediately after the attack, and police have asked members of the public who saw a blue 2009 Hyundai Getz in the area afterward to come forward. Police have seized the hatchback, with Queensland registration 432 TYO, and will allege it was driven from the carpark after the attack. They have since said they are seeking four persons of interest, all males of African appearance, who left that vehicle and walked away.]

Sam Newman: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: Carjackings, home invasions, …

Sam Newman: Same in America? Plenty of White people stab people as well.

Blair Cottrell: That’s true, but the statistics prove that it’s very disproportionate. Right? Like I wish race was just skin colour. I wish that was the truth!

But the fact is there’s a lot more going on with race than just the colour of skin. It’s the way of thinking and behaving. It’s the IQ, it’s the capacity for creativity and understanding. There’s a lot going on there that we need to explore. This hyper simplified generalised idea that race is just skin colour. Okay. If we’re going to survive as a country, as a people, we need to move beyond that.

[See: Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70 — TRANSCRIPT]

[22:23]

Sam Newman: Should we start to move the previous inhabitants of the country out? Should we start to move the Aboriginals out, or what should we do with them?

Thomas Sewell: Look, I’ll answer the question regarding the Aboriginals. I think that they have two options. They have two options.

Sam Newman: The people that were here before us?

Thomas Sewell: The people we conquered this country off. Yes. We conquered this land off them. Yeah. By force. We took it by force. And I’m not ashamed of that. I think there’s a lot of people that are ashamed of that.

But I think all countries that are in existence are created through force. Every single one! I don’t think there’s One Nation that is free from the guilt of conquering a lesser people.

Blair Cottrell: What were we supposed to do when we arrived?:

“Oh, there’s already some semi-nomadic tribes here eating each other, we better go home!”

Sam Newman: No, that, no, no, …

Thomas Sewell: I believe we conquered this country.

Sam Newman: I’m on the record as saying that. I’m saying this country is here because of settlement.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

Sam Newman: In 1788 or something. I’m saying that. And there was 150,000 Aboriginal people on 7.7 million square acres [km] of country. So hardly, we’ve hardly taken over their country. But they were the previous inhabitants. Well, well, we’ve hardly taken it over in as much as this country is what it is today because of settlement.

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I agree with that.

Sam Newman: So my question. Well, but that’s just a fact.

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Isn’t it? So what do you do with the people that were here before us who aren’t the same skin colour as the people that you prefer?

Thomas Sewell: My initial thought is that they should be left alone. We should stop giving them money. We should let them have their own little societies and let them govern themselves. I’m sick of playing babysitter.

Sam Newman: Well, how would that work? How can they govern themselves? What does that mean?

Thomas Sewell: What, are they not human? Are they not capable of self governance?

Sam Newman: Well, govern themselves where? In what cities or what?

Thomas Sewell: They shouldn’t be in the cities. They didn’t build them.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think Aboriginal people are our responsibility. I think they’re their own responsibility.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, this is the conversation a responsible White government that represents White people should have with a responsible body of the Aboriginals that represent Aboriginal people.

And then we can sit down at the table, White Australians representing White Australians, with Aboriginals representing Aboriginals, and we can have an honest conversation about how we’re going to make it work.

Sam Newman: So if you say we took over the country from them, why don’t we help them assimilate, seeing as we took the country off them!

Thomas Sewell: We’ve done that for 200 years and it hasn’t worked. I don’t think it’s the solution to the problem. I think that all people should have their own uniqueness. And if we are the true appreciators of diversity as we say we are, I don’t think we should mix everyone into one caramel people. I don’t think that’s a good policy to have. I think the Aboriginals, let them preserve their culture and their identity somewhere. All right, that conversation is on the table for later on. It’s not a conversation. I can answer right now because I don’t have control of the State Department.

Sam Newman: So these groups like yours. Let me tell you what your group is the National Socialist Network.

Thomas Sewell: Blair’s not a member.

Blair Cottrell: I’m just an individual and I do my own media and influence, and that’s where I’m most useful. But Tom is the leader of the National Socialist Network. Yeah, we’re all colleagues, Tom and I. We came out of the United Patriot movement.

Sam Newman: So if I wanted to become, what criteria would I have to fulfill to become a member of the National Socialist Network? Do I have to, …

Thomas Sewell: You have to be White. So you have to be, …

Sam Newman: I’m through to the semis without dropping a set. Right. What’s the next thing?

Thomas Sewell: So you have to be of European descent.

Sam Newman: Have to like Hitler?

Thomas Sewell: No, you don’t have to like Hitler.

Sam Newman: But what I have to do? Do you have to pay money?

Thomas Sewell: We ask for members over The Age of 18 to pay $50 a month. I think that’s a fair fee to help run all of our training. Our physical training.

Sam Newman: Training?

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we do physical training. So like part of what we do as a gym club.

Sam Newman: Physical training? I see.

Thomas Sewell: Yes. Yes. We do exercises in the park.

Sam Newman: Yes, I see. So if I wanted to become a member of the National Socialist organisation. Yes. I got to be White, …

Thomas Sewell: And you have to be of honour. You have to be of honour!

Sam Newman: What does that mean?

Thomas Sewell: You can’t be a homosexual.

Sam Newman: I see!

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So we don’t accept people that don’t want to live in a healthy, homogenous White society. We don’t believe that homosexuals or people with sort of deviant sexual ideologies have a place in our organisation.

Sam Newman: Homosexual. Like men, …

Thomas Sewell: Men that have sex with other men. We don’t want anything to do with them.

Blair Cottrell: It’s probably got something to do with the point of the community, which is to procreate and continue the existence of our people.

Thomas Sewell: We don’t believe they can be members of the community.

Sam Newman: Well, I’m not a homosexual.

[27:08]

Thomas Sewell: Well, then you can join. Obviously you’ve got contentions about Hitler.

Sam Newman: What we, …

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so we got, …

Sam Newman: I have contentions about Hitler, …

Thomas Sewell: We have probably 25% of people interested in our community are not sure about the Hitler question. They go:

“I support 99% of what you guys are about, but what’s with Hitler? Why do you guys like him?”

And so we have this conversation like we’re having right now in good faith, and we explain what Hitler means to us. And people can be neutral about that or they can be like:

“Wow, I didn’t realise Hitler was so good!”

Or they can say:

“Actually, I think that’s nonsense! I’m going to believe what the TV says about Hitler and what the jews that run the education system say about Hitler, and I’m not interested in joining you guys.”

And that’s the conversation I have every day.

Sam Newman: So we have Goring and Himmler.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

Sam Newman: They were his acolytes that went around the SS, …

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to know that much about all that, …

Sam Newman: The Black Shirts, …

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to have an infinite in-depth knowledge of World War II history to join our community. But what, as I said at the start of the podcast, what Hitler represents to us is not a man, but it’s an idea that we can have a triumph of our national spirit, that we don’t have to bend the knee to China or bend the knee to globalism or the UN, or the woke culture. That we can have a triumph of the Australian will, a triumph of our own folkish spirit. And that’s what Hitler tried to put forward.

And the other thing that he put forward was he said that:

“German people do not love each other enough, that we’ve got this fascination with all things foreign and we don’t have a strong enough love for our own kind.”

And what we want here in Australia is, okay, butter chicken is kind of nice, and Chinese food can be nice, but what we need is a love for our own people.

Sam Newman: Butter chicken can be nice, …

Thomas Sewell: Sure!

Sam Newman: Chinese food can be nice, yeah.

Thomas Sewell: But we need a love for our own folk. That’s what we need.

Blair Cottrell: For our bangers and mash [chuckling]

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s beyond food. It’s beyond food. There needs to be a depth of patriotism and a depth of nationalism that we have respect. Young people. And you know this as a fact, Sam, young people are being raised in the schools, and there’s not a national flag in the kindergarten. I have family that work in kindergartens and primary schools.

Sam Newman: I’m on about that, mate!

Thomas Sewell: They don’t have an Aussie flag in their school. They have a transsexual flag. And personally, I would rather be speaking German than have a transsexual flag in our schools.

Blair Cottrell: Let’s remember why we’re here, too.

Sam Newman: Why are we here, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: The reason that the boys came to your attention in the first place is because they were arrested in Adelaide for marching down the street with Australian flags on Australia Day.

[See: Police arrest nationalists celebrating Australia Day in Adelaide to protect ‘survival day’ protest]

Sam Newman: I know. I like that. Not so much that it was the association of the Nazi salute, which is absolutely struck out from every Western society for whatever reason. Do you think that, …

Thomas Sewell: It’s not struck out from every single one. It’s struck out from Germany, Poland.

Sam Newman: American.

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s legal in America.

Blair Cottrell: Did you not hear about the arrest of the seventeen gentlemen in Adelaide for celebrating Australia Day?

Sam Newman: What’s that Blair?

Blair Cottrell: Seventeen, …

Sam Newman: Yes, I heard them. Yeah, because they were associated with a Nazi organisation.

Blair Cottrell: But what were they doing on the day? They were marching down the street singing Waltzing Matilda, carrying Australian flags with the purpose of celebrating Australia Day. They were arrested for loitering.

Sam Newman: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: And possessing a disguise which ended up being hats and sunglasses.

Sam Newman: And swastika, …

Blair Cottrell: There was no swastikas. There was no Nazi symbols.

Sam Newman: Weren’t they covered up?

Thomas Sewell: No, there was no swastikas!

Blair Cottrell: There was none of that.

Thomas Sewell: That’s a complete fabrication by the media.

Blair Cottrell: They were targeted because of what they believe, not because of what they were doing.

Sam Newman: I see!

Blair Cottrell: That’s an interesting legal precedent for us to have to experience. Don’t you agree?

Thomas Sewell: The State Department, …

Sam Newman: People listening to this will say:

“You’re gradually winning me over.”

But you’re not! But I’m happy. I am interested in the conversation.

So why did you, … I’ve lost my train of thought when you said they were. Do you have, what’s the membership? No, I’m talking about being a member of the National Socialists. I’m not gay and I’m White. What else? What’s our membership? Our membership? If I pay me 50 bucks, what do you require me to do?

Thomas Sewell: We have layers of membership. So in terms of our activists, we’ve got about 250 activists in the country. So an activists are men that are prepared to march in the street with us, that are prepared to train with us, …

Sam Newman: March in the street to say:

“We want a White society?”

Thomas Sewell: Correct. Yeah. So we have 250 men.

Sam Newman: But that is completely pointless to do that because it’s not going to happen, is it?

Thomas Sewell: It will happen. Because if it doesn’t happen, …

Sam Newman: What, you’re going to clear out the percentage of people who aren’t White in this country. You’re going to send them home or you might gas them!

Thomas Sewell: No, I have no intention of gassing them. That’s clickbait.

Blair Cottrell: We need to be, …

[31:42]

Thomas Sewell: That’s you being cheeky, Sam.

Sam Newman: I’m being cheeky. How else do you get rid of people? Put them on container ships and send them, …

Thomas Sewell: You just put them on a plane and send them home. Every country’s done it!

Blair Cottrell: But there’s a process there and I think fundamentally, …

Thomas Sewell: America’s doing it right now!

Sam Newman:

Thomas Sewell: So why can’t we do it in Australia? Germany’s doing it right now. Austria is doing it right now. Sweden’s doing it right now. They’re all warming up. They’re all warming up the planes.

Blair Cottrell: Mass deportations is a popular talking point.

Sam Newman: No, it is Blair.

Thomas Sewell: And it’s inevitable. Sam, I’ll explain.

Sam Newman: And I’m a great fan of Trump’s, what he’s doing.

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: I am, but, …

Thomas Sewell: Because he’s doing it from a popular perspective, not from a racial idea.

Sam Newman: But he’s not trying to make America White!

Thomas Sewell: Maybe not in policy, but everyone knows deep down that he’s not deporting millions of White people. So even though he’s not explicitly saying it.

Sam Newman: Because White people aren’t pouring across the Mexican border!

Blair Cottrell: But what’s wrong with Australia being White? What’s wrong with that?

Sam Newman: No, because you know exactly what the popular opinion on that is, because it’s just racist!

Blair Cottrell: Why is that racist for us to have our own living space?

Sam Newman: Because racism is absolutely about, … Racism is if you decry, degrade or demean, …

Blair Cottrell: But I didn’t insinuate that. I said:

“Why can’t Australia just be White?”

That’s not about decrying or demeaning anybody.

Sam Newman: Because there’s probably, …

Blair Cottrell: Do we call Chinese people racist because they want China to be Chinese?

Sam Newman: No. Hang on.

Blair Cottrell: Why is there this double standard there? All I’m saying here, Sam, is that we need to have our own team.

So this thing we call life, listen, this thing we call life in politics, right, it’s a team sport. And unless we’re playing as a team, we’re not going to do any good with the competition, especially when everybody else is playing as their team.

Thomas Sewell: There’s not 200 million Whites in China!

Blair Cottrell: Let me finish.

Let me finish. You got Indians. They’re playing for their team.

Sam Newman: You stopped him speaking. You stopped me speaking before. Now you’re stopping him.

Blair Cottrell: Because I’m just trying to make my point. I haven’t said a lot since I’ve been on here.

Sam Newman: Really?

Blair Cottrell: So the Chinese come into Australia, they’re playing for their team. The Indians come into Australia, they’re playing for their team. They’re living with their own, they’re working with their own. Not only do we not have our own team, we’re expected to play for everybody else’s team. How long can we continue to do that and still exist as a people? I don’t want to exterminate everybody else.

Then there’s no competition. There’s no game at all! That’s like just because you barrack for Carlton or Geelong, you don’t want to exterminate every other team in the AFL. You just want to play as your team.

Sam Newman: You want to exterminate people. In inverted commas, “exterminate”, not put them in ovens. You want to exterminate everyone who’s not White from this country!

Blair Cottrell: No, that’s not true.

Sam Newman: Yes, you did say that!

Blair Cottrell: There needs to be a lot of people going home because a lot of people are here illegally and they shouldn’t be here.

Sam Newman: Yes, …

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people are taking advantage of our country and the financial system.

Sam Newman: As they do everywhere.

Blair Cottrell: They’re making bank from mass immigration.

Sam Newman: As they do everywhere.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Sam Newman: There’s a lot of people illegally in a lot of countries and ideally speaking, they should be sent home and you should get in a queue and do it properly, legally.

Blair Cottrell: Bloody oath! It’s a good start.

Thomas Sewell: I don’t want it to be a legal queue from China because they’ve got their own homeland. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They’ve got their own homeland, they’ve got their own home, they’ve got their own government that advocates for them.

Sam Newman: So you only want Canadians and the British and Americans to get in the queue to come here legally?

Thomas Sewell: I think that Europe and Western civilisation, we’re all brothers, we’re all cousins, we’re of the folk. We’re a nation, we’re related to each other. I have infinitely more in common with a White Canadian, or a White British, or a White Icelandic person. Infinitely more in common than with a Chinese person.

Sam Newman: Aryans!

Thomas Sewell: White. Yeah. Europeans, Aryans, whatever you want to describe us. Than a Chinese person with an Australian accent.

I have infinitely more in common with a White person on the other side of the earth than a Chinaman with an Australian accent.

Sam Newman: No, no. So Thomas, …

Thomas Sewell: And they can pretend to be us, pretend multiculturalism’s working, but it’s not! I want a home for my children!

Sam Newman: So, Thomas.

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: And Blair. There’s 25 [27] million people in Australia, I presume. I’m just guessing this. I reckon half of them aren’t White.

Thomas Sewell: I think we’re at 60%, yeah.

Sam Newman: 60% are White?

Thomas Sewell: 60% are White, yeah.

Sam Newman: So you would ideally like, gradually to start the 40%, getting them out of the country.

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: And get us down to about a 12, 13 million.

Thomas Sewell: The same way that it, … No, we would probably be, yeah, about 15 million. I think.

Sam Newman: 15 million would be happy.

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I think that’s a good starting point to then rebuild Australia.

[36:01]

Blair Cottrell: That’s what the people who founded our nation, that was their vision.

Thomas Sewell: Yes. And that’s what they did. Australia, founded on that, …

Blair Cottrell: The Immigration Restriction Act. And Alfred Deakin, one of the first prime ministers of the Federated Australia, said that he wanted to remove all coloured peoples in our midst.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Australia was built on racism. We’re not foreign. We’re actually holding on to the true ideology that Australia was built on.

Sam Newman: In 19, … Prime Minister Curtin said:

“This country shall remain forever the home of people from the British race.”

That’s what he said.

So that was the start of the White Australia Policy. And then Harold, …

Thomas Sewell: It was even older than that. The White Australia Policy used to be called the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901. The Founding Fathers, like Deacon, …

[See: Joel Davis – The White Australia Policy with Matthew Grant – Jul 27, 2023 – Transcript]

Sam Newman: It was a dictation test. If you couldn’t spell or couldn’t write English, …

Thomas Sewell: They did that cheekily. What they would do when a non-White person. This is a fact. What they would do when a non-White person would enter Australia is they would give them the dictation test.

Sam Newman: That’s right.

Thomas Sewell: In German or Spanish or some European language that they obviously couldn’t speak.

Sam Newman: Or whatever.

Thomas Sewell: But the Immigration Restriction Act did very clearly state that they only want people of Aryan descent!

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: Which back then meant European!

Sam Newman: One of your must read books, I presume, is Mein Kampf*, is it?

[* Mein Kampf is a 1925 autobiographical manifesto by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler. The book outlines many of Hitler’s political beliefs, his political ideology and future plans for Germany. Volume 1 of Mein Kampf was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926. The book was edited first by Emil Maurice, then by Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess. Wikipedia]

Thomas Sewell: It is important Political Science. Yes, yes.

[See:Rethinking Mein Kampf — by Thomas Dalton]

Sam Newman: You’ve read Mein Kampf, have you Blair?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I read it first when I was about, … I didn’t begin to understand it until I was about probably 20, 21 years old, but, …

Sam Newman: I’ve not read it. What’s it about? Hitler, just telling us what you’re telling us.

Blair Cottrell: Well, it was written by Hitler in Landsberg Prison in 1923. So some time before he came to power. But it provides interesting insight into the guy’s psychology and the kind of man that he was and his vision for the future of Germany. And it’s one of those books. I was surprised it even existed at all, because when I was in high school I heard about nothing but gas chambers and evil Nazis! But apparently my history teacher forgot to tell me that the man behind it all wrote his own book.

So when I saw it on the shelf in a random bookshop in North Fitzroy, you know, somewhat trendy bookshop. So I thought I’ve got to give that a go.

Sam Newman: Have you two lads, gentlemen, people, been radicalised? When did you start having this philosophy about the country we live in? I don’t know how old you are.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think loving your country makes you radical. I think certain people who don’t want others to listen to us, who don’t want us, who don’t want our point to get across to a larger audience would write us off as radical, extremist or quote, unquote, “Nazi”.

But at the end of the day, I think what we stand for in terms of tradition, family, common sense, most people would agree on. It’s just that perspective of the Second World War and the war propaganda, the surviving war propaganda, that people would be contentious with sam Newman: So you, for want of a better word, get away with this on the basis of free speech is what you should be allowed to have. And you said you, this was nothing more than political persecution of you for having these views by people who don’t agree with you. Did you not?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Yes, you did.

Thomas Sewell: I did say that in court.

Sam Newman: You did say that in court. So you think that, not to put too strong a word on it, but people would think that this is “hate speech” and you say:

“No, this is my privilege to have free speech and to allow to express myself. And you’re being politically persecuted for having these views and this is not right! And you’re going to test it before the courts.”

Blair Cottrell: What is “hate speech” other than speech that people in power don’t like?

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I contest the notion that there’s even such a thing as hate speech. I hate the people who say:

“Burn down Australia!”

I think that’s hate speech.

Sam Newman: Do you think it’s not, now, I have no skin in the game here. I’ve said this many times. Do you think it’s not hate speech for Palestinians to walk around the community here and lock down the streets in here, shouting abuse and vile statements at people of the jewish nation, or if there is a nation from Israel, or from whatever, slagging jews? Do you think that’s hate speech and that should be allowed?

Blair Cottrell: I’d go further and say it’s completely irrelevant to Australia. What are these people doing here in the first place?

Sam Newman: No, no, …

Blair Cottrell: If they love Palestine so much, go and fight them for Palestine. What are they doing marching through Melbourne?

Sam Newman: So, no, no, that’s a different argument. I take that on advisement. I’m just saying, do you think that’s not hate speech? You think the Palestinians or the jews who slag them back, backwards and forwards, at some stage you can’t say things about people or else we have a completely disjointed and dysfunctional society if you allow people to say absolutely anything they like about people in the name of free speech!

Thomas Sewell: I’ll say this. Free speech should only be the right of people that are of the folk. If you’re in good faith, …

Sam Newman: Of the, …

Thomas Sewell: Of the folk. Of the nation. Of the people.

Sam Newman: Of the folk! Yes.

Thomas Sewell: Yes, of the folk. FOLK, the people.

Sam Newman: That’s right.

[40:58]

Thomas Sewell: I don’t believe that Palestinians should have free speech because I don’t think they should be in the country.

Sam Newman: But that’s a different argument.

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s not a different argument, because we have to define left and right of what is free and what is not free. And I don’t believe that the left and right arc of what’s free speech and what’s hate speech should be whether the government agrees with it or not, or whether some purple head freak in the diversity departments of the government like my opinion or not. They shouldn’t decide what’s free and what’s not free.

What should be decided is this person of the nation and does this person have love for the nation? And if they don’t, if they want to destroy Australia, then they shouldn’t have the right to speak. We shouldn’t let them in the country.

Sam Newman: The government of responsibility would say if you allow hate speech to proliferate, then that just opens the gates to physical violence because it fizzes people up to the fact that they feel inadequate verbally. So they just go the old physical stuff. And that’s what the, …

Thomas Sewell: The government uses physical violence against me, because they don’t like my political views. The government uses physical violence against me!

Sam Newman: Because they the manhandled you? How did they, …

Thomas Sewell: We have been harassed.

Sam Newman: I saw a security guard ask you to leave the premises of somewhere, …

Thomas Sewell: Before throat punching my colleague. Yes!

Sam Newman: Yes. So would you, …

Thomas Sewell: So we’re changing topics. The subject was about free speech. So my answer about free speech is that we as Australians should have the right to freely criticise the Australian government for its treasonous decision to ethnically replace our host population.

Sam Newman: So Thomas, the man who asked the man who asked you to leave was of some African origin, or he was black.

Thomas Sewell: Correct.

Sam Newman: And you said to him, [chuckling] you said:

“Dance monkey, dance!”

Thomas Sewell: I didn’t, my colleague did.

Sam Newman: Oh, so your colleague said:

“Dance monkey, dance!”

Thomas Sewell: He started dancing! So we had left the building.

Sam Newman: So do you think that’s free speech?

Thomas Sewell: I’ll tell you the full story.

Sam Newman: Yes. Thank you.

Thomas Sewell: We left the building. He asked us to leave.

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: Right after Channel Nine called us “terrorists”.

Sam Newman: I know.

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t committed any terrorism.

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: And they smeared us and slandered us, and no legal defense department wants to take up us up on the offer.

So I went down there to make a speech, to make a point of it.

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: And we got asked by security to leave. So we left. When we were outside the front of the building, I started making my speech again and we were asked not to make the speech out the front of the building, but to walk all the way to what was called the Draino line [sp].

Sam Newman: Yep.

Thomas Sewell: Right. And I asked nicely:

“Where is the Draino line?”

And he started walking us towards the Draino line. As we’re walking to the Draino line, he began dancing like a monkey. Like this?

Sam Newman: Yes.

Thomas Sewell: Mocking us! Mocking us like:

“Haha, you dumb White racist. I can use physical force, remove you from this building, there’s nothing you can do about it.”

And then while he was dancing like a monkey, my colleague said to him from the “Tones and I” song [Dance Monkey].

All right:

“Dance for me, dance for me, monkey.”

That Tone’s and I song, because that was popular in the media at the time. And when he said that, this African, who could not control his own behaviour, throat punched my colleague! And when he throat punched my colleague, I have a love for my colleagues and for my folk and I’m prepared to use force to protect them from violent thugs that do that.

And so I dropped him. Yes, I hit him, Wayne Carey* style. I smashed him. Absolutely! I absolutely smashed him! I didn’t stop smashing him until he stopped. And when he was on the ground and he stopped, I left him alone.

[* Wayne Francis Carey (born 27 May 1971) is a former Australian rules footballer who played with the North Melbourne Football Club and Adelaide Football Club in the Australian Football League (AFL). Carey was inducted into the AFL Hall of Fame in 2010. Although he was eligible for induction in 2008, his off-field troubles with drugs and violence delayed his induction. Wikipedia]

But then he wasn’t satisfied with that. He got up off the ground and tried to go again. So he got a good jab and then he went inside. He learnt his lesson.

Now I had to do 150 hours of knitting, as my punishment for dropping that African. But I did not, …

Blair Cottrell: What was that? Knitting, community service?

Thomas Sewell: I had to do knitting! I do 150 hours of knitting.

Blair Cottrell: That’s a pretty wholesome community service. [chuckling]

Sam Newman: So!

Thomas Sewell: So that’s the full story.

Sam Newman: This almost reinforces my point that if it was considered hate speech, then it turned to violence! And the more we engage in, …

Thomas Sewell: Who turned it into violence?

Sam Newman: Maybe, maybe, I’m just saying. And then it is provocative to call a black person a monkey.

Thomas Sewell: Why?

Sam Newman: Because! [chuckling]

Thomas Sewell: Have you done it? Did you receive violence when you called a black person a monkey?

Sam Newman: Well, I, …

Thomas Sewell: Did you receive it.

Sam Newman: I have never called a black person a monkey.

Thomas Sewell: I believe that you have.

Sam Newman: Have I?

[45:13]

Blair Cottrell: You suggested that George Floyd was a scoundrel and you had to, …

Sam Newman: I didn’t.

Thomas Sewell: Even when you’re on the Footy Show.

Sam Newman: What called someone a black person a monkey?

Thomas Sewell: No, sorry, not a black person. You called an Asian person a monkey. It was a Malaysian.

Sam Newman: Yes, I did.

Thomas Sewell: Yes, a Malaysian.

Sam Newman: I did.

Thomas Sewell: A dark person. You did so.

Sam Newman: No, I did. It was an Asian person. A dark person.

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it was a dark Malaysian.

Sam Newman: I did. And I got reprimanded severely for that.

Thomas Sewell: But did you deserve violence for it? Did you deserve to be attacked by someone that lost their temper, or was there some civil process that you could go through for saying something?

Sam Newman: Very glad you, … You’ve done well. I’m very glad you got me on that because I did say, …

Thomas Sewell: Because they use violence as, …

Sam Newman: Just hang on. You threw me there. No, no, no, he’s good. I’m glad, you threw me. No, I was going to say to you about the black fucking monkey. What was that?

Oh no, George Floyd! Now I never said, George Floyd, that is the greatest bullshit I’ve ever heard in my life.

Thomas Sewell: I agree.

Sam Newman: George Floyd was a, … I got cancelled off the Footy Show for this. I know, because I said on this forum that George Floyd should not have died how he did, but he was a piece of shit!

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: He had a string of con [victions] and, …

Thomas Sewell: And he robbed a pregnant woman at gunpoint!

Sam Newman: And they burnt America down for two years. And the government let it go just in the name of Black Lives Matter which is domestic terror organisation. Some of the suburbs here out in [word unclear] they have Black Lives Matter walk and alleyways, and they have a sign up. The greatest bullshit I’ve ever heard. So George Floyd was a piece of shit, but he shouldn’t have died, probably, how he did.

Blair Cottrell: Well, you rightly pointed out that what began as a legitimate form of protest against police brutality morphed into something else which ended up being about racism and just an excuse to bash on White people.

Sam Newman: That’s right. And just a corrupt and dysfunctional organisation called Black Lives Matter, which is, …

Thomas Sewell: It was promoted by the mainstream media.

Sam Newman: Yes. All right. So, …

Thomas Sewell: Police took a knee for them. But the police attack us!

So the police take a knee for communists, black communists. But then they beat up White men. Which shows you this, the state of affairs.

Sam Newman: What’s that Blair?

Blair Cottrell: This particular conversation. This point of the conversation we started at about a hate speech, didn’t we?

Sam Newman: And I don’t know where we started. I’ll tell you what I’m asking. It’s almost finally. Unless you like to make another three minute announcement. I’ll give you a final word. You can just go for your life and I’ll sit here.

Are we affiliated? Are we? I haven’t quite joined the party yet. What did we go through, what I have to do? I’m not homosexual. I’m White. What else do I have to do? Give you 50 bucks a month?

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to give me 50 bucks, …

Sam Newman: What else do I. What else? What else do you go through?

Blair Cottrell: You have basic fitness standards too, don’t you?

Thomas Sewell: There’s layers of membership.

Sam Newman: So there’s an age limit?

Thomas Sewell: No, there’s not.

Sam Newman: I’m 80. Can I get in?

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

Sam Newman: Oh, should I? And how many members have we got? Did we ask?

Thomas Sewell: As I said, of activists? So our, …

Sam Newman: No. How many people are a member of the National Socialists?

Thomas Sewell: Thousands. We have thousands of supporters.

Sam Newman: Are they?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Oh, well!

Thomas Sewell: How many activists do we have? The guys that train with us and the guys that march with us. About 250.

Sam Newman: And the idea of training and marching with you is to overthrow someone one day, is it?

Thomas Sewell: Not necessarily to overthrow, but to show a triumph of the will.

Sam Newman: Right.

Thomas Sewell: I think that masculinity is under attack.

Blair Cottrell: To have a have a team too.

Sam Newman: You’re not part of it, you’re just in here as a guest.

Blair Cottrell: I’m very much part of it.

Sam Newman: Oh, you are. You see, you tried to disassociate yourself!

Blair Cottrell: I’m not a direct member, but I work with the community.

Sam Newman: Beautiful!

Blair Cottrell: And I’m good at it.

Sam Newman: Now, are we affiliated with like minded neo-Nazis overseas?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Are you?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Do you have Skype meetings?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Do you go over and join their celebrations or marches?

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

Sam Newman: Do they come here?

Thomas Sewell: Not many have come here.

Sam Newman: They wouldn’t get in!

Thomas Sewell: Australia’s a hard place to get into unless you’re brown. [Sam chuckles]

But yeah, we certainly, we’re a global movement. We’re a global movement of nationalists that want each of, … Because there’s no homeland for White people anywhere. Australia is not an isolated incident. This is happening in England, in Germany, in France, in America. Every White country is losing their homeland!

So White people all around the world are realizing we’re the only ones that are having diversity thrusted upon us. Every other group gets their homeland plus they get to come here.

So we’re getting colonised. We’re getting reverse colonised. Through subversion. Through subversion!

[See: Poseidon — Replacement Migration Agenda – United Nations — TRANSCRIPT]

[49:48]

Sam Newman: So basically you want to overthrow society with a White revolution?

Thomas Sewell: Well, look, we need a spiritual revolution.

Sam Newman: You seem to be disagreeing with it because that was one of your quotes. Not yours [Blair’s]. This is one of his quotes.

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s a step by step process and like if we can remove the illegal immigrants first.

Sam Newman: You wanted to buy a plot of land out in the country and settle it with White people.

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely! I want to have a home.

Blair Cottrell: I’d rather us be in control of our own country. If that’s not possible, then maybe we have to look at separating.

Sam Newman: Right oh. Now look.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think there’s two primary methods of how we go about this, and neither of them are this kind of fantasy that you’re alluding to, that we’re just going to become armed one day and just start randomly killing people. I don’t think that’s in our interest.

Sam Newman: Yeah.

Thomas Sewell: Sorry, I’ll say it again.

Sam Newman: For God’s sake, I’ll hate to miss any of this, mate. It would be pointless doing this.

Thomas Sewell: Okay, I’ll say it again quickly. I think there’s two possibilities. One, we take state power through the methods that are available to us within the democracy. The other, if we’re unable to do that, is to separate, is to build.

Sam Newman: The only way we take you, take state power, is to put yourself up for pre-selection at local council, state government and federal government and see how you go.

Thomas Sewell: Well, over the next five years, you might see that.

Sam Newman: No, you might. Yeah. Well, now, look.

Thomas Sewell: But I want to build a foundation first before I run, before we run anyone as a political, …

Sam Newman: You seem to be not happy with the way this started, Blair. How should I end it? What should I say? How should we end this?

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s, …

Sam Newman: Should I thank you very much for both coming in. I’m not sure that I agree with anything you say, but you might be surprised that I agree with a lot of it. But that will be in the eye of the beholder or the ear of the listener! But I do know why now, you are intent on being anti-social and being so disruptive amongst the mainstream. But you’ve pointed out the mainstream are biased in certain way they report things. And I think this has been a worthwhile chat to both of you.

I can assure you that none of this will be edited. And this will. This will go on our podcast and you people can watch you and you and me having a chat about something.

Is there anything else you’d like to say?

Blair Cottrell: You’re a good sport for having us on, Sam. I really didn’t expect to be sitting here with you, so it’s a great opportunity.

But I think I’d just like to wrap it up by reiterating the point I made about Aussies playing as a team. It was the original team, the original Australians, that built this country. And we need to start thinking more collectively again because everyone else is doing that. Until we get our team back and we start playing as a team, we’re not going to have much of a future. And we need to send back the illegals, people who shouldn’t be here, people who are exploiting Australia. They need to go home. And we need representation for White Aussies.

Sam Newman: Right oh, …

Blair Cottrell: At the end of the day that’s all, …

Sam Newman: That’s enough, Blair, please. Thank you.

Blair Cottrell: Why is that enough?

Sam Newman: Because you now, …

Blair Cottrell: Am I making too much sense? [chuckling]

Sam Newman: No, this is now becoming a political speech. No, that’s good.

Thomas? What do you want to say? Anything else?

Thomas Sewell: I appreciate you giving us, …

Sam Newman: Yeah, good on it.

Hey, Blair and Thomas, thank you for coming in and being part of You Cannot Be Serious. I’ll probably get the biggest kick. You never know. I mightn’t get a kicking. They might, people might find this actually reasonably interesting no matter what they think about what you’ve been doing.

So thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Thomas Sewell: We love our country.

[53:13]

END

top

============================================

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/7/2025 = 1,823)

@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013
3 days ago
Imagine a country where White people loved and cared for White people
726

18 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Yeah and where we weren’t humilated by foreign groups.
65

@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013
2 days ago

@LordOfSweden Our day is coming brother
35

@bperez8656
2 days ago
Australians are cooked
Yall call free speech a “privilege” and not a human right.
You have so much to learn from the American constitutional republic system of govt
Democracy is a tyranny of the majority
A constitutional republic is governed by god given rights and laws that CANNOT be infringed.
8

@Robert13732
2 days ago
It’s not allowed because of a pile of shoes.
38

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@Robert13732 Not the shoes. It should be called the Shoeah.
4

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
@bperez8656 there is a man rotting away in prison with a 400 year sentence for wrongthink in America right now… You have no clue what you are talking about.
4

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
@Robert13732 you think the shoes are bad? Have you seen the piles of laptops and cell phones? How were they even meant to tiktok while in the camps? Tragedy.
4

@neilr4867
1 day ago
Unstoppable.

@Mike-pf1ru
1 day ago
@Dan-TheOracle Who is the guy in prison?

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
After going through the Indoctrination System, I have no idea what you are talking about.

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
Imagine even more a country that loves all people as the image of God.
2

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
@pelagonianlion8276 A world, not a country.

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
@SavesWhiteLives What do you categorise as white? Where do you draw the line where white ends and non white begins?

@Mike-pf1ru
1 day ago
@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013 If you go back through your ancestry 500 years to the year 1525, say 20 generations, you have 1,048,576 direct ancestors. Over a million people in 1525 contributed to you being here today. That’s just 20 generations. 21 generations ago, say in the year 1500, that’s 2,097,152 direct ancestors. There’s a high likelihood that all of us have some Jew or Persian blood in our family trees. No one is purely “white”.

@LAMethWitch
13 hours ago
Sounds great

@kalinkalass1877
12 hours ago
@pelagonianlion8276 White could mean strictly people of European ancestry/blood.
In these circles it usually does.

@clayton.stewart
10 hours ago
Why has it become so offensive to be a white nationalist?

@r9715
9 hours ago
Literally heaven

@hadzic4512
3 days ago
The media have called Thomas and Blair every name in the book, but they have never called them liars. Let that sink in.
965

23 replies

@LordOfSweden
3 days ago
All they can do is throw names, same in Europe and all over.
47

@Shblibble
3 days ago
What the hell are you talking about?! Yes they have. Heaps of times! What planet are you on?!
1

@michaelirish1445
3 days ago
@Shblibble You and I may not agree with them, but name one lie? or are you no better than the MSM?
31

@Shblibble
3 days ago
@michaelirish1445 Dude, I have tried 3 times to reply to you. Youtube keeps censoring me!
This is a test message….
2

3 days ago
@Shblibble Surrre
14

@Shblibble
3 days ago
The point I’m trying to make is….. go ask your great-grandpa who fought in WW2 what he thinks of these guys……
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@Shblibble What are they saying that is a lie then?
13

@Shblibble
2 days ago

@ That is one hell of a rewrite of history. You are a lost cause.

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden ”Tell me where’s the lie?”
A : “that’s the worst rewrite of history ever” classic
10

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Dunning-Kruger.
3

@dima_r6
2 days ago
They are heroes
7

@Shblibble
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden whatever it takes to make Adolf the good guy right?

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Look at Europe. Is that what winning looks like?
16

@Shblibble
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden The fact you have a problem with it says everything.

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@ A problem with what exactly?
9

@Comatosedpeanut
2 days ago
@Shblibble goober
8

@scorpio8963
2 days ago
@Shblibble My Great Grandfathers did not fight for a future where their descendants are a minority in our countries. It’s common sense.
26

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@charltoncorbett2973 Can anyone else see who he’s replying to? Or is that one down the memory hole?

@jordane19969
1 day ago
They destroyed our state minnesota, too. Only one of the few white people whenever I go to a store in or near Minneapolis. Completely unrecognizable now
8

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ The great-grandpa that fought on the wrong side? We lost that war, only the small hats won.
4

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ You mean saying the small hat myth is a small hat myth? No one ever took a final shower.
1

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ He was the good guy
2

@TriggerJim88
3 hours ago
WOah. Deep without the meaningful.

@IRELANDAMERICAUK
3 days ago
Thomas and Blair are legends
619

@alisonmckie5717
3 days ago
These young men are saying what many are scared to say. They are clearly and articulately stating what is happening to Australia and all Western countries. Very interesting interview.
575

3 replies

@007lyse
3 days ago
I’ve been racist for decades. Lol. 40+ yrs ago I claimed that black people are black & white ppl are white so we are different. Compare that to birds. Not all birds are same color. Since then Ive been called every other name in the book BC I never go along with the current thing. Funny how when opposing views
are heard ppl start to flail with ad hominems or swears in the midst of cognitive dissonance. Good on you Thomas & Blair. I’m trying to tell the truth of flat earth. Wish me luck. Lol
21

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
@007lyse so brave old man… so brave.. see you in 15 years or no?
1

@suad01
3 days ago
@007lyse Mohammed Ali would agree with you
7

@JeffarryLounder
3 days ago
I’m gonna be honest, these are quite-literally the only people in Australia right now who are prioritising the REAL Australians first, and the fact that they have been shunned and censored so much is a sign to how little freedom we ever had to begin with.
955

12 replies

@lexingtonconcord8751
3 days ago

54

@travv88
3 days ago
exactly
46

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
The cool guy club
8

@Palendrome
2 days ago
You have to support them, the movement is growing there
13

@ALS_AustNZ
2 days ago

4

@MarketInsights-jq3cl
2 days ago
There is no freedom in Australia, that’s why I left.
3

@James_744
1 day ago
@JeffarryLounder real
1

@mayomonkey420
1 day ago
jailed…

@danas3765
1 day ago
Yea….we know

@madeleinethornton-smith1761
16 hours ago
First Australians are the real Australians

@thatonebtsfan
42 minutes ago
the real australians? so the aboriginals? yall have no shame

@JeffarryLounder
37 minutes ago
@thatonebtsfan Be real: we are the real Aussies. There was no concept of an “Australian” before we came. The land we call Australia today was a barren land of warring tribes at best. They were only allowed to be called fellow “Australians” under our kindness and nothing more.

@IbizaPalms
3 days ago
I send my fullest support for Thomas Sewell and his movement in Australia! Greetings from Rome, Italy. Hail Victory!
540

6 replies

@matt79hz
3 days ago

20

@stoveone4031
3 days ago
Presente!
14

@ThomasCourchesne
2 days ago
HAIL VICTORY!
10

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago (edited)
To victory, youu look like a syrian tho
3

@Drvol1
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden LordofSweden lol. Francesco Totti and Daniele De Rossi are from Rome. They look a lot whiter than Alicia Vikander. Stop being divisive.
6

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@Drvol1 Alicia Wikander clearly has some kind of other ethnic background that Swedish though, so that’s not strange.
Also it’s an average, not single individuals we’re speaking about.
I speak from proof, logic and history. Try doing the same.
1

@TheMogician
3 days ago
Good on you for having the balls to do this, Sam. It is ridiculous that even talking to people should require such courage in a so-called “free country”.
263

@neilr4867
3 days ago
We are losing our cultural identity. Vast swathes of our cities are mostly Indian. Why is it “wrong” to not want your country to be like this? I miss the Australia we had.
503

15 replies

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
Should of fought harder, you had plenty of warning
7

@damachinen
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 So it all over, then? Nothing can be done about it..? Nonsense. One generation has sold out the Australian people, another generation is trying to fix the problems.
44

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@damachinen
Did I say that ? You’re crying on the Internet about whats happening when I can almost gaurentee you’ve never been out with any active club or NS group.
8

@neilr4867
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 it’s “should have”, not “should of”. English your second language?
10

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@neilr4867
Should of fought harder buddy. Now you cry on YouTube hahahaha

@brayofficial2160
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 judging by your username that you’re a boomer I’m guessing?
14

@n8errific
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966
Yeah! we, people who were born in the 80’s and 90’s, should have fought harder against the anti-Australian subversion that started two decades before we were born.
We play the hand we are dealt.
19

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Enjoys a sneaky curry or kebab on the weekend when the ‘ball and chai ‘ lets em out… based af
1

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
@n8errific
Precisely
4

@neilr4867
3 days ago
@n8errific 100%. We’re dealing with the shit left by the Lib/Lab uniparty and their rusted on voters who have destroyed this country. They all need to go.
7

@Dorian-pn5rc
2 days ago
Same happening here in Britain, Ireland and most of Europe
5

@Beva-c8j
1 day ago
@n8errific we are doing it NOW, its OUR time. Boomers failed, Gen X failed. Its the Xennials doing the heavy lifting — and we will not stop.
4

@n8errific
1 day ago
@Beva-c8j I don’t know if you believe in the Bible at all but a common theme is the God wants the older siblings to help the younger. As a millennial and a believer I try to help my younger siblings. You are the future. I pray you are successful.

@jolheb9091
22 hours ago
Lots of Muslim populated areas you cannot enter now either
2

@anniew4105
1 hour ago
@neilr4867 it’s actually either

@mrx6682
3 days ago
When freedom of speech is allowed, NS always wins
509

6 replies

@BiancaZombie
3 days ago
Yep, its that simple
46

@servando6074
3 days ago
En todo occidente padecemos las mismas politicas. El pueblo elegido lo controla todo. Saludos desde España. 88
26

@JHS-2
2 days ago
1000.000.000.000%
5

@Phoenix-pl6ys
2 days ago
Always
4

@Heismytopguy
2 days ago
Greetings from America our population is about 60% white right now too I think all white countries are facing the same problem
11

@danas3765
1 day ago
@Heismytopguy you’ve noticed the pattern. Now ask yourself why, who benefits
1

@StirlingCooper
3 days ago
Good on you Sam, don’t let anyone bully you into not expressing your freedom of speech
516

11 replies

@AnnoyedFieldHockey-dk1fm
3 days ago
didn’t know you were this based Stirling.
39

@StirlingCooper
3 days ago

@
31

@JetsFan123-y4e
3 days ago

@AnnoyedFieldHockey-dk1fm Being a pornstar is antithetical to the worldview of the 2 men on this show… not very based
24

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Oh no.. don’t bully old white men.. based af

@curedbybp3003
2 days ago (edited)
BWC nietzschean energy
1

@darriusjeddburgh6316
2 days ago
although there are those { with small hats} who will say ” free for me but not for thee”.
8

@allisonhughes4348
1 day ago
Set your watch to the bald 40-something guy with the facial hair and tate complex to offer his support

@StirlingCooper
1 day ago
@JetsFan123-y4e retired and repenting
7

@thatonebtsfan
42 minutes ago
@StirlingCooper repenting? your content doesn’t look that

@StirlingCooper
20 minutes ago
@thatonebtsfan How so?

@thatonebtsfan
11 minutes ago

@ lustful content bro shame shouldn’t be that hard

@tourdetrance24
3 days ago
Both Tom and Blair make good points, why are western countries the only ones forced to accept multiculturalism ? when was there ever a referendum on immigration in Australia ?
Multiculturalism and endless immigration have been forced onto Australians not for the better and we have had enough.
400

3 replies

@wattosacrim
3 days ago
Australia for the white man.
We are not the worlds shitting bowl
680

4 replies

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
The rest must go
13

@danas3765
1 day ago
Not their babysitters.
2

@pelagonianlion8276
23 hours ago
@danas3765 you, Danas, are not who’s baby sitter?

@danas3765
11 hours ago
@pelagonianlion8276 3rd
1

@darrensmith88008
3 days ago
Now we know why Blair and Tom are so censored. They are running rings around the most rebellious boomer Australia has to offer Thank you for giving them a fair go though Sam!
280

@bethannodwell
3 days ago
Thomas and Blair are absolute chads who have the spirit to save Australia
150

@jaysungardiner967
3 days ago
Based free speech enjoyer.
303

@CanadianGirlRevenge
3 days ago
I really respect these men for standing up for their country and people
224

@BiancaZombie
3 days ago
Free speech must be defended. Great to hear diversity of thought.
289

2 replies

@DuerstMania
2 days ago
Free speech raythith
4

@BiancaZombie
2 days ago

@DuerstMania \¥/
3

@rossf4196
3 days ago
Hail victory
240

@codesTD
3 days ago
good on you Sam for having the integrity for not editing this
281

3 replies

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
He is just soooooooooook brave
2

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
He did however shout them down and speak over them many times…..as well as injecting sneaky trigger words now and then. Keep it real.
16

@codesTD
2 days ago
@MagicManintheSky Come on mate, go easy on him, clearly his full of lead poisoning and Pfizer boosters of course he was always going to boomer out in the interview. Im just trying to affirm him for at least giving them a platform, give the guy some slack.
22

@MaxRuffian
3 days ago
You’re bloody legend Sam, I thoroughly enjoyed this interview. I loved the AFL analogy from Blair. We need our own team.
236

3 replies

@libertus8924
3 days ago
Sad that Sam is considered a legend when he’s so desperate to appear that he doesn’t agree with what these two gentlemen are saying and cutting Blair off when he made a very good point about white people needing to become a team.
26

@Seánybruv
2 days ago
The White team
3

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@libertus8924 I respect him purely for having the balls to have them on. When sky news dared to have Blair on TV 6 years ago, heads rolled in the boardroom. While a podcast is not quite the same, Sam is still a big name from TV land, and he took a risk by inviting them on. The jevvs will still try and close his bank accounts or cancel him just for giving them a broader platform
4

@LogicaIn
3 days ago
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Thank you, gentlemen!
156

1 reply

@Orxbane
2 days ago
I’m surprised this actually made it past the Yewtube censors for me to see.
4

@iSpike
3 days ago (edited)
“WE LOVE OUR COUNTRY”
100% well done by Sam & his two guests. Three AUSSIE MEN speaking TRUTH, sometimes the TRUTH hurts.
WAKE UP AUSTRALIA!
109

@lioncross1849
3 days ago
Great interview. A lot of sense coming from the guests.
418

4 replies

@aperson7368
3 days ago
Thanks Vegito
10

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
Show us super homophobia 3
4

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
@theREELdogman Why are you gay
1

@theREELdogman
2 days ago

@ don’t make me hate crime

@southern-samurai
3 days ago
If indigenous are given billions a year for their own land for their own people, how is it wrong for us host Australians to demand the same of our own country?
131

1 reply

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Are you living on planet earth

@georgetaylor9154
3 days ago
I also remember seeing those piles of dead bodies on the wagons, being told they were jews going to the ovens in high school history. Later to learn those exact pictures were actually just dead Germans civilians after the Dresden fire bomb raid.
315

8 replies

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
@georgetaylor9154
Wow! I remember when I was able to post such things in YT comments.
Now I’d be fortunate if even this reply wasn’t censored.
23

@birchtreebattle7153
3 days ago
@1neAdam12 we can’t let that stop us from speaking the truth
10

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
That’s messed up.
4

@thought_criminal14
3 days ago
Everything’s just upside down, isn’t it
12

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@1neAdam12 yeah I’d get an instant 24 hour ban for that lmao. I’d have to disguise words like “jevv” to even make it post temporarily
3

@mijellonbooth8797
2 days ago
Good work, Sam. Tom / Blair, you have my support on a lot of it before and even more now
1

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
1 day ago
The victors write the history books
1

@cybergun01
20 hours ago
@birchtreebattle7153 True, but many of us now have to speak in code to get around it. It appears censorship has levels per person, i’m assuming how long and how many comments we’ve made over time that get flagged

@cragtitlar8500
3 days ago
I found Tom and Blair to be highly commendable individuals. You guys definitely have my support.
162

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sam I am 72 and followed your career as well as you being on the footy show
However I don’t like Australia now and worry about the future of my 8 grand children . Please rewatch the interview , the men and they are MEN make sense . I am a big supportive of them
No one else speaks up and are scared to. They are brave and ANZACS
243

8 replies

@JoshLevo
3 days ago
Spread the word to your grandchildren and support us then. Do something
41

@gailash1170
3 days ago

@ really?
4

@HP66856
3 days ago
WELL SAID These men speak sense.
28

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
I cannot wait for your grand kids to wish you farewell old thoughts

@dwillbecancelledsoon4086
2 days ago
Well said. This is why i began following their podcasts on Odysee and Rumble, and subscribed to their channels on telegram.
When mainstream media tries to censor a group so much, you know they must be speaking the truth
20

@Seánybruv
2 days ago
Good on you
11

@layersoftruth8115
2 days ago
Grandma Waffen
11

@ThomasShelby6213
11 hours ago
We’ve got the best grandmas, don’t we folks?
2

@southern_fryd
3 days ago
Blood and Honour
226

1 reply

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
@southern_fryd cool pfp. I love and hate it at the same time
2

@Sakurabreeze4
3 days ago
that was a great interview. it is recommended to all the doubters out there to look up British historian ‘David irving’.
233

6 replies

@davidspencer8087
3 days ago
And Ernst Zundel.
23

@Jim-yk9zw
3 days ago
Hail Ursula Haverbeck!
19

@dwillbecancelledsoon4086
2 days ago
The documentary “Eur0pa: the Iast battIe” is fantastic too
24

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Or Stu Peter’s…
Occupied.
3

@danas3765
1 day ago
F. Leuchter
2

@gepettosplaylists
19 hours ago
@danas3765 Yes, Fred too
1

@Toleich
3 days ago
These two are just saying what a lot of people think and talk about in private.
What a shameful time when you need to be brave to speak up for your country.
73

@darrensmith88008
3 days ago
Getting in quick before it is removed. Great interview! Shame Blair’s interview on Sky News never made it to air
128

@TangoRomeoAU
3 days ago
Great episode, was intersting to hear this convo happen in good faith. Props to giving the lads a chance to speak.
116

@MsJackamara
3 days ago
Well would you look at that, two men speaking up for white Australia, what a breath of fresh air. Thanks Sam for airing this interview, taking a leap where others fear to tread. Respect to Thomas and Blair.
75

@mrmoney2249
3 days ago
Time will prove Tom and Blair right. Let’s hope they save Australia before it’s too late.
198

2 replies

@Lugh666
3 days ago
These men are true Australians! It’s good to let them speak their minds.
73

@fishsteak3246
3 days ago
Last time I visited an Australian public school I walked into the office and there was a wall that contained all the class captains of each year. Not a SINGLE one was an actual Aussie or European, every single one was an immigrant. Tax paying Aussies are being forced to pay for being ethnically replaced.
No one likes being radical outcasts, but it is a reaction to the extreme circumstances we find ourselves in. How can you not be horrified knowing that we went from being 100% Australian and the lucky country to only 60%!!!!!! Australian and one of the most unaffordable places to live in the world, with that number set to keep on getting worse without us even getting a say.
Aussies are not able to buy land, we’re watching the country we grew up in become something unrecognizable, and these people are some of the only ones actually doing anything about it. What do you expect the disenfranchised Aussies having our country ripped away from us to do?!
209

2 replies

@michaelsuncle5085
3 days ago
Same as here in nz,i have painted afew kindergarten schools in various areas of Christchurch and the number of non whites in the classes has got way out of hand
15

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
1 day ago

@ThomasShelby6213
3 days ago
Hail Tom and NSN o/
281

3 replies

@codesTD
3 days ago
o/
9

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
I love millhouse
1

@ChudRevolutionary1488
3 days ago
o/
8

@701splinter
3 days ago
These guys are the only sane voices in Australian politics today.
116

1 reply

@snowpalace423
4 hours ago
What??

@southern-samurai
3 days ago (edited)
Yes. Australia for the Anglos. We can’t even afford to live in a community of our own kind in our own country anymore.
225

3 replies

@Cp041
3 days ago
Australia for all Europeans. Not just Anglo’s
6

@fyrdman2185
2 days ago
@Cp041 Nah

@Cp041
2 days ago (edited)
@fyrdman2185 why?
A lot of the what you would call “wogs” that were born and bred here have great grandparents and grandparents parents who fought on the axis side in WW2 and those ideas and beliefs are still held onto very strongly 2-3 generations later. The “wogs” I know, myself included all born here but proud of our European heritage are more patriotic and nationalistic then the “aussies” I know. What our great grandparents and grandparents believed in and fought for, we still believe in the same ideas, we just apply it to our, Australia.
1

@CodexIndia1
3 days ago
Ground breaking interview. Amazing stuff.
184

2 replies

@suad01
3 days ago
We need a follow up where they can flesh out the big points.
7

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@suad01 They’ll never be invited back on.
2

@gnosticacademy
12 hours ago
Did I just become a Nazi? Lol.
Mad respect to Blair and Tom.
16

@aussiegodx8629
3 days ago
They have some great points, very interesting tbh
137

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle

@WhiteDrake77
3 days ago
Can Sam answer: If over the next 200 years Australia for whatever reason between immigration and birthrates drops to 10% white/European, is it still Australian?
Is Japan still Japanese if it’s 70% Indian?
134

5 replies

@matt79hz
3 days ago
This needs to be a pinned comment
23

@andypandy-qz5om
3 days ago (edited)
I have an Indian friend who wants Australia and New Zealand to remain supermajority White as it was when she was a girl in the 50s. She’s not stupid and knows full well what’s in store if her guys take over.
19

@LZBlackDog71
2 days ago
@andypandy-qz5om unfortunately they wanna deport your friend even though it sounds she has assimilated and become Australian

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@andypandy-qz5om Then why doesn’t she help that happen and leave?
2

@TerminallyCh1ll
1 day ago
@LZBlackDog71 no such thing as assimilation
2

@napalmwarfare740
3 days agoAUSTRALIA FOR THE WHITE MAN!
THE REST MUST GO!
296

4 replies

@wrongthink1212
3 days ago
This is an issue with the movement, though. Like everyone not 100% White must leave ? Is this actually the goal ? What about Abos or 50%ers or others with no other citizenship ? Can you not be pro-White and anti-immigration, even an area of the country for only White people, but without making it sound like you want to do total ethnic cleansing or something ?
5

@AntipodeanRose
3 days ago
@wrongthink1212 Even 12.5% non-founding stock is considered unacceptable. Reach your own conclusions. Tried to state the obvious in a previous reply. Evidently, that’s not allowed here. Wonder why?
5

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
@AntipodeanRose It’s that ALL or nothing attitude that will trip you up.
(The previous comment had a valid point.)
1

@AntipodeanRose
1 day ago
@gepettosplaylists Lol. That’s their policy, not my personal opinion.
1

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Please watch:
Europa, the last battle
59

2 replies

@brent5310
1 day ago
Game-changer of a documentary. Lots of valuable insights that explain WWII and our modern era. It all just makes so much more sense after watching it.
3

@KingHiPoint
4 hours ago
@brent5310 once you watch it, it’s is impossible to go back
1

@Metal_V.2
3 days ago (edited)
well done Sam. I bet you are more than a little surprised and just how much support these Aussie Patriots have from fellow Aussies and around the world.
70

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
You can see Sam glitching out when he’s asked point blank “why is it bad if Australia is white”
74

4 replies

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Loads of visible brain glitches haha
20

@James_744
1 day ago
He kinda came around though I think deep down he likes both Tom and Blair but the boomer mentality is utterly insufferable

@pattycrabby9749
1 day ago

@James_744 he did not “come around”, his follow up video he calls them turds and parasites…
5

@samsonn94
1 day ago
@pattycrabby9749 nah he chickened out from the backlash
2

@WitchHunterSiegfried88
3 days ago
Always nice to see /ourguys/ on shows like this.
95

@user-vt4gm4qq9p
2 days ago
The biggest number of views
on this content creators channel are for this interview.
Looks like people are interested in what is being discussed.
72

1 reply

@danielarcher1459
1 day ago
Exactly. I haven’t seen the like/dislike ratio but I bet it’s >95% positive. There is a huge demand for this conversation amongst the people – it is the elephant in the room that no-one’s talking about! The regime only allows the conversation to go one way right now and that has to change.
2

@frankplissken143
3 days ago
Wow. I came here expecting a “Romper Stomper” kind of show and left wanting to join them.
Not a single point they made is objectionable.
They are serious men that will become important leaders in the future.
73

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle to learn more
1

@AusCaesarist
3 days ago
Very bold interviewing these gents and you should be commended. It’s always worth speaking to people who present challenging ideas. Especially when the mainstream zeitgeist believes in censorship
81

@weaponxiv9701
3 days ago
Pair of legends right there
73

@andrewmatthews2092
3 days ago
Go Sam, bloody legend pushing back on MSM
101

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Righteous stuff, thanks for the interview!
97

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Heres a question;
Is Europe not diverse?
Dozens of countries, languages, cuisines, histories, national dress
Is that not already multi-cultural?
And
Red, blonde, brunette, black hair
Blue, green, hazel, grey, violet, brown eyes
Is that not a “people of colour”?
So what do they mean when they say white European Australia needed to be more diverse?
And that we needed to be multi-cultural, when we had Polish, Italian, Greek, British, German and Irish communities here already?
Diversity meant “brown skin black hair”
Multi cultural meant “not white European”
We WILL have either a white Australia or a brown one
There is no in between
50

1 reply

@lukavidic9990
2 days ago
It was diverse, now Paris, London, and Berlin look quite alike.
6

@colinwhite71
3 days ago
It was really great that you put this interview up and to be able to hear both Tom and Blair’s perspective.
It is so tiresome to just hear the MSM and politicians kvetch and tell the Australian people what to think.
61

@thanoscr7939
3 days ago
While the interrupting was annoying as fuck, I’m glad you had them on.
143

12 replies

@KS-yg9jr
3 days ago
Almost unwatchable with all the interrupting.
20

@martinpospisil3747
3 days ago
He has no logical arguments against their points so he has to constantly interrupt. That his only option really.
41

@Blackdeathgaming-yv1kk
3 days ago
@martinpospisil3747 he’s a boomer though, so it’s sorta forgiven. i have a soft spot for old people.
12

@KS-yg9jr
3 days ago

@ 100%
2

@Starnzee
3 days ago
He spoiled the whole conversation, condesening, interupting, clearing no idea at all. He needs the wake up and open his mind or stop doing this. Go back to playing football dude you’re a lousy interviewer. Couldn’t even finish this because of him.
18

@dogman17
2 days ago
I think he’s just trying to save face and avoid seeming like he agrees with them, it was also clever how he came from the angle of “if I was to join” and then realised he meets all the criteria showing that most of them are just Aussies that love Australia not skinhead Nazis.
10

@thanoscr7939
2 days ago
@dogman17 It’s strange that he’s all about free speech and had them on to let them speak, but then interrupted them constantly to stop them from speaking. At least he eased off it when Tom pointed it out.
5

@dogman17
2 days ago
@thanoscr7939 I mean he’s done a complete back flip on x, claimed Blair was an uninvited opportunist that forced his way onto the show. Tom and Blair have since been banned from X presumably due to some kind of string pulling from this coward.
7

@John-iy7xo
2 days ago
Just started and he interrupted them first answer. Is it all like this?
4

@KS-yg9jr
2 days ago

@ Yes. Tom and Blair get minimal time to explain their points. Sam was exercising some ‘soft censorship’, and obedience signalling, that’s for sure.
5

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@Blackdeathgaming-yv1kk Why? They’re part of the reason we are in this mess in the first place. They guzzled down the small hat programming and ran with it.
1

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
@Starnzee he’s almost 80
for the 1st time in his life he had to defend woke multicult against 24/7 seasoned final boss professional racists
he tried to trap them then when demolished pivoted to stupid sarcastic membership questions
1

@JP-vj7fp
2 days ago
The guests are totally and completely correct.
32

@Jordan-ey5vd
2 days ago
Europeans deserve our homelands, free from foreign influence.
27

@Vril_Seeker
3 days ago
Don’t miss their live streams on Rumble and Odysee on Thursday nights!
149

6 replies

@gailash1170
3 days ago
I am a boomer and watch it week. Very intelligent men with a wonderful purpose
27

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@gailash1170 Always nice to find a boomer that understands the JQ instead of running away from it.
3

@quentinstacy35
1 day ago
What is the channel called? Thanks.
2

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ Joel Davis. He does it with Blair and Tom shows up most of the time as well.
2

@matthewharrison8940
1 day ago
what is the name of the channel?
1

@brent5310
1 day ago
What channel(s)? Haven’t found any yet.
1

@NEKROLUST
3 days ago
Amazing stuff guys.
91

@HardlinersParadise
2 days ago
This Thomas and Blair are making complete sense, im glad i heard these two men talk to Sam, they are extremely passionate in defending Australia and its true identity.
40

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle if you’d like to learn more

@imperialhonorguard1483
3 days ago
Support from America. Australians must uphold their right to free speech.
57

@WhiteDrake77
3 days ago
I’d like to hear more from these guys, why does every other group get to play for their own team except ours?
244

@HP66856
3 days ago
Thank you, Sam, for having the courage to bring these two men in. They represent what a lot of us think but have been browbeaten into silence. Good job Tom and Blair – you have my respect
53

1 reply

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Oh wow he is so brave to admit his bias.. so brave.. you too troll

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Good stuff lads
81

@mitchbrown3911
3 days ago
They gradually won me over! Erudite young men.
70

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle to learn more

@np8814
7 hours ago
These guys are spot on with everything they said, This is what true Australian leadership looks like.
4

@MrBlaygor
3 days ago
“We need our own team.”
58

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
General George S Patton “We fought the wrong enemy.”
13

@NinthNazgul
3 days ago
It’s true. We were never asked.
113

@andreaboundey7850
3 days ago
The woke folk would be having a breakdown right now
68

1 reply

@darriusjeddburgh6316
2 days ago
and that is not just a good thing, it’s something that should be done 24/7/365
1

@Leigh666XF
3 days ago
Not sure Sammy was ready for that
Legend for having the chat and putting it out for people to make up their own mind
52

@justinchappe
3 days ago
An interview for the Australian history books.
143

@janoycresva2018
3 days ago
Damn these guys make a lot of sense
63

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle if you’d like to learn more

@iSpike
3 days ago (edited)
text-green-game-overVOTE 1 BLAIR COTTRELL for Prime Minister of AUSTRALIA elbowcough
59

@Greg-yq5sc
3 days ago (edited)
Sam…as a decades long Geelong supporter I reckon you have career peaked (i.e social media) with this incredible raw and TRUE interview with genuine Aussie ‘outlaws’. Its like the first mainstream journo to interview Ned Kelly. Credit to you for having the guts, brains…and timing… to do this. I don’t agree with the Oz neo-Nazis on everything…but I think Australia should be MAJORITY White as the founders intended. And that DOESN’T exclude other races contributing as a MINORITY.
99

1 reply

@Xylos101
3 days ago
there were some great eps of street talk.
2

@redpillbot92
3 days ago
Great interview. Hail victory
58

@harpersneil
3 days ago
Outstanding stuff – kudos to Sam for being one of the few bastions of uncensored media.
TS and Blair are bloody legends.
50

@Mk-np2bu
1 day ago
Thomas Sewell is amazing for exposing the truth!
11

@andreaboundey7850
3 days ago
Great information. Australia is definitely worse during these times due to the migration into Australia. They are not patriotic to Australia, they are not contributing positivity to Australian culture. I don’t like what is happening right now. I dislike going into public spaces and the majority of people speak another language. Its terrible! These guys are spot on!! Good on you and thank you for speaking up!
44

@gary1705
3 days ago
Thanks so much Sam for having the courage to do this interview
36

@HamletsGoon
3 days ago
This is easily the best content to come out of Australian politics in many, many years.
Second part when?
80

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
lol not in a billion years

@soldierundercommand8307
3 days ago
Awesome Interview Sammy
59

@NORMIESAXON
3 days ago
Tom and Blair speak the truth.
39

@Lord_Humungus
3 days ago
I garantee this old guy would never berate any other racial advocate other than white. if a nigerian said they wanted nigeria to stay nigerian, nobody would bat an eyelid, but this guy has the big balls to join in attacking the guys who already have all mainstream media attacking them for expressing the same reasonable belief. of coarse its completely normal to not want to be ethnically replaced, saying it isnt is embarrasingly clownish, emperors new clothes shit
42

4 replies

@danielarcher1459
3 days ago
This can’t be said enough
6

@Juiceb0xable
2 days ago
This
1

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
How cowardly is it though?

@brent5310
1 day ago
Spot on.

@billyharrison2381
3 days ago
Freedom of speech should never be revoked, Blood and honour
41

@exquofonte
3 days ago
They have not chosen the easy path. You have to respect that
40

@user-ip3rz2pn7w
2 days ago
These guys actually make a lot of sense.
17

@SheffieldBornAndBred
3 days ago
Should have been interviewed separately but a great interview regardless, hats off to the guests for having the intelligence to see and understand the threat all white western nations are facing, the tide is turning.
47

1 reply

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago (edited)
Absolutely. I would have loved to have seen an interview with just Blair and the host.
4

@bruciekibbutz2947
2 days ago
Having watched the whole thing now, it’s clear Sam isn’t quite all there anymore. It’s a shame he chose to attack Blair and call him a scumbag the following day, but he’s struggling to even have a conversation, it’s no wonder he buckled to pressure after this interview.
18

1 reply

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
+1 for having them on
-1 was pussing out the next day

@damachinen
3 days ago
Sam, are you going to have these 2 blokes back? I’d like to hear more from Tom and Blair on other issues that Australians face. Thanks for the interview.
55

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
lmao never

@belteshazzarinbabylon6047
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell and Blair are great men! Keep Australia Australian!
36

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
Well done to Sam Newman for conducting this interview. Too bad he pussied out the following day after Dvir and his media/political lackies started freaking out. If Sam thought Blair and Tom were so repulsive, why didn’t he say it to their faces during the interview? Pretty weak if you ask me.
8

@mollypillow8118
2 days ago
“I’ve been to Dachau so all the stories are true.”
Good show by the two, allegedly hateful guests who were composed, polite, and speaking obvious truths.
19

@RagnarLothbrok2222
1 day ago
Australia is for Australians – that’s IT. Based dudes standing up for their people
8

@SenatorSlayer
3 days ago
Sam Newman thank you for defending Free Speech
56

1 reply

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago
He didn’t. Sam- “Hurtful words create violence in competing foreign demographics, therefore the only solution is to create hate speech laws”
3

@nope8183
9 hours ago
These men seem pretty level headed glad to see White men have unity for THEIR homeland.
4

@Leanflare
3 days ago
Hail Tom
64

@ozzicossy5552
3 days ago
We have the right to have our own nation for our people.
A nation is about more than just “ideals and values”.
The millions of indians can go back to india and have those ideals.
41

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
When in India i was told “I want to live in your Country because your Government pay people to stay home and not work”. These guys are running rings around this interview..their knowledge is amazing..
15

@newway61
2 days ago
Great interview thanks Sam. TOM AND blair are well spoken, articulate and they conducted themselves in a professional manner which resonates with many many Aussies who are currently watching Australia burn through the mismanagement of corrupt politicians and external unelected organisations. I encourage those with an interest in our true history and the real facts of what happened in WWII to find Europa the Last Battle
20

@FrankTigani
3 days ago
Sam is a boomer but still credit to him for at least having these guys on
36

@JHS-2
2 days ago
Brilliant! This is an educational interview. Well done guys! Love and greetings from an Scandinavien Anglo-Saxon.
19

@proxywar99
2 days ago
Every time I hear Thomas or Blair speak I’m always impressed with their ability to articulate themselves and their confidence with which they explain their taboo worldview. It takes guts and brains to do what these guys are doing. The cowards who denounce them will be forgotten quickly but these brave young men will make the history books and be talked about for decades to come!
16

@Truth_seeker1984
3 days ago
Sam is going to cop it in the MSM for this can’t believe he actually posted it
39

2 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago
He has nothing to lose these days. Love to see it.
9

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
@neilr4867 he was fired 5yrs ago for calling George floyd a pos on air

@heritagefirst
2 days ago
Boomer is mystified that the youth in his country are disgusted by what his generation threw away. Then has the audacity to act like he’s virtuous over them. The disconnect between the young and the old has never been more stark
13

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Boomers my Rss!!!
It was a boomer that brought this to my attention over 20 years ago…
(Grow up)

@brendezen
3 days ago
As someone who makes videos on Australian pride myself, thank you Sam for allowing our two brothers onto your platform to express themselves freely. That’s the way it should be.
43

@southern-samurai
3 days ago
They make very good points.
39

@AmericaFirstKorey
1 day ago
Two very well spoken gentleman. Why is it that they call them evil, but never wrong? Is it only wrong because they are exposing the truth against those who wish White Australians harm?
7

@MattiDwyer
3 days ago
These guys make too much sense to give a fair hearing. Thanks for having them on.
21

@CurtTaylor-n8z
2 days ago
Those Aussie lads are not wrong. They are heroes of their nation and people.
18

@redoz9768
3 days ago
White Australia policy years also had tariffs to protect local manufacturing and jobs. When they dropped the tariffs we lost all of our manufacturing industries.
30

3 replies

@robertaustin6940
3 days ago
Bring back the WAP!
2

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago
The LIMA declaration detroyed that
3

@Jim-yk9zw
2 days ago
And think of all our gas, iron ore and whatnot going overseas for a pittance while we pay a premium. Some Scandinavian nations actually have a sovereign wealth fund where the resources sold result in dividends for the citizens. Not good old Australia though.
3

@darhman5299
3 days ago
Great job. Sometimes, difficult conversations are necessary. I respect, admire, and even fear free expression. While I don’t always agree with it, I accept it.
31

@annyirish6106
3 days ago
It’s so frustrating to watch the host trying miserably to argue for the mental chains he’s been put in.
36

7 replies

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
Even more frustrating to have all your comments deleted when you haven’t even broken the so-called TOS.
8

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
As I tried posting numerous times here now,…
How do you keep a populace diseased?
3

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
By marking the bottle of medicine which will cure them..
2

@1neAdam12
3 days ago

1

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
I had to break my comment up into multiple posts, just to have it stick.
THAT’S where we’re at!
5

@PM-im8nq
3 days ago
He’s a boomer, give him a break
4

@annyirish6106
3 days ago
@PM-im8nq I give him kudos for having these fine young Australian Aryan men on but it’s frustrating to watch the cognitive dissonance all the same.
5

@tagekoolander
2 days ago
Europeans deserve to preserve their homelands
28

@gitboy314
3 days ago
Would love to see more of Tom and Blair on podcasts with a coherent interviewer.
55

@anonymous-3695
3 days ago
Defend free speech at all costs.
37

@Dei-gratia9498
3 days ago
So their main point is that Australia should be a white/European homeland. Same views
as the founders, which made Australia, usa, canda the top countries everyone wants to move to. Very good interview, you should have with them more times, greetings from Sweden
37

@brettweir9050
1 day ago
Australian’s, I hope you regain your land and I hope your elders wake the F UP. I hope all White nations wake the F UP. We as white people are the only race who move humanity forward in knowledge, technology, and exploration.
8

@pictlander
3 days ago
Great interview.
51

@steveos6472
3 days ago
Best podcast yet!
30

@collider5362
3 days ago
I agree with everything they said
34

@hevsa1507
3 days ago
Good on you for sticking to your principles Sam.
The legacy media might come down on you like a ton of bricks, but that’s only because they’re afraid of losing control. Tom and Blair are stand up guys and this show proves it.
26

@andystuart4667
3 days ago
White Aussies just want a place to call home. And some representation would be great
Great interview these two lads, made some excellent points
16

@thomasbrittinghamjr.8508
3 days ago
Thanks for having these guys on. It’s a shame what the establishment media, government and police have done to these men that love their people and country. Lots of good, common sense from them.
22

@minecraftislit
3 days ago
Fuck yeah
30

@fionagolsdworthy
3 days ago
Sam was being a complete arsehole if you ask me.
I take my hat off to Blair and Thomas for staying calm and collected.
You both love your country and only want what’s best for it. As do I.
47

3 replies

@spoilsvictor993
2 days ago
if sam wasnt being an asshole he wouldnt be doing his job. sam just played devils advocate and quite well. you can tell hes impressed.
2

@innes2819
2 days ago
@spoilsvictor993 I’m not so sure, I think he wanted a spike in viewers and these two were his ticket.

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
@spoilsvictor993 I get the impression he wanted to catch them out & discredit them.
But failed.
(Let’s hope he learned something.)

@kooszondernaam
3 days ago
Great interview. Australia for the White man!
32

@derwoodhamburger
2 days ago
I’m not much into the white nationalism, maybe I’m a little uninformed. But I do believe the 6 million number has been widely inflated. I also think these 2 men are good blokes despite what any mainstream media may say about them
27

@Keribou109
3 days ago
Massive respect to Sam for this. Blair and Thomas are legends. Let’s see others follow suit and platform these gentlemen and many others like them.
23

@NathanOrlick
3 days ago
Well done Sam, these guys aren’t the raging psychos the media makes them out to be
19

@pureblood3765
3 days ago
Hail Victory! Hail Free Speech!
33

@northender2928
11 hours ago
Great interview, These guys seem really intelligent and well spoken, Absolute Chads. I reckon most every average White Australian, Canadian, American and so on feel and connect with what they are saying on some level.
4

@Ek-re8ts
3 days ago
Sewell and Blair are honorable man and the interviewer just made himself look like antagonistic vermin.
55

4 replies

@dirtymcgreg
3 days ago
sam newman is peak boomer he’s definitely out of his depth here but didn’t do too bad
21

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
70+ years of programming will do it.
12

@locmajor6159
1 day ago
@dirtymcgreg never seen him before because I’m American, I knew I could’ve been reading him wrong with nothing prior to go off of but I thought the same lol
1

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
Interviewers are allowed to be antagonistic. Otherwise what’s the point? Without asking legitimate questions it’s just propaganda.

@translatoractivist
3 days ago
You are a brave man. It takes balls to seek for Truth. God bless you
21

@slonkymalonki2933
3 days ago
Love it!!!!
40

3 days ago
Freedom of speech will never die
27

@peterfreeman927
1 day ago (edited)
This interview was the best discussion I have seen in years, well done to all involved. I live in Melbourne and it is not the place I grow up in, I will be moving to the country were it is mostly white.
8

@Wyatt-ub6hn
3 days ago
Support to Australia from America. Our nations will be free once again.
15

@forbesy3082
3 days ago
Great interview, well done Sam for doing it, one of the only people to hold an honest interview these days. And how can you not agree with Tom and Blair? All White men should be joining their team and fighting for the future of Australia.
28

@earlturner6023
3 days ago
Sam you’re a legend mate
36

@benlecornu356
3 days ago
good on you sam for havin them on!!
42

@peekaytruth6649
2 days ago
Finally you have interviewed some intelligent people who have balls
10

@CircumambulationMaedia
2 days ago
These guys are legitimately the only people in the political space that care about Australians
9

@Edfgt
3 days ago
Hail Victory Blood and Honour
25

@Sonnenwolf777
3 days ago
Nice to see these guys actually not getting censored for once haha
19

@zachary_duggan
3 days ago
Yes Australians are waking up! To find out rules you, look at who you cannot criticise! Unfortunately our government, military, media & banking system are all controlled by the same people who were kicked out of 109 countries for the same thing.
17

@JarlBubbleLord
3 days ago
They’re spot on!
21

@GorilazPlay
3 days ago
Great episode, victory is inevitable! Greetings from Sweden
28

@LogosVeritas-di1yp
3 days ago
more interviews like this…. Australia!
38

@Helen6565e6b
3 days ago
It is now 2:30 am Tuesday morning
I listened to the podcast from start to finish. I found the topic quite volatile, passionate, and scary at times, but I persevered and listened without my own feelings, getting in the way
Basically, I heard what most Australians are thinking in private, but don’t dare say out loud. To a certain extent, of course .
The only thing I can say is that this government and governments that have come and gone have ruined Australia and will continue to do so.which gives rise to these groups of people because they feel unheard and despondent and have deep feelings of uselessness and hatred.
Thank you Sam for having the courage to bring this topic to your listeners.
22

10 replies

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Why add “hatred” though…
Where was the H8???

@Helen6565e6b
1 day ago
@gepettosplaylists These men are full of vitriol, but then, if our government closed our borders and stopped bringing people in, things wouldn’t escalate as they have now.
We are a country with an abundance of natural resources, but we make nothing that in itself is soul destroying and makes for a poisonous society
We need to start making things again to be proud of ourselves and our country.
1

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
@Helen6565e6b Yeah I agree with pretty much all you said… But I wonder why you are using the word “hatred.”
“H8” is a loaded word, a word that carries connotations, and has been weaponised via law.
I didn’t see any “H8” in their interview…

@Helen6565e6b
1 day ago
If you find the word hatred offensive ( as obviously you have ) The action of the word is far more dangerous. Search deeper into what they’re actually saying .I’m sure you are intelligent enough to understand their intentions.

@gepettosplaylists
19 hours ago
@Helen6565e6b they are simply annoyed at what has happened to their country…
That doesn’t by default equal hate…
You should be intelligent enough to comprehend that surely.

@Helen6565e6b
19 hours ago

@gepettosplaylists Don’t you mean OUR COUNTRY!!!!!
And excuse me, but now you’re being snidely with your remark.
See how things can turn, and we are just two people .
Something to think about.

@gepettosplaylists
18 hours ago
@Helen6565e6b It’s called being snide, not snidely…
And it was similar to the way you ended your comment to me…
Don’t give it, if you can’t take it.

@Helen6565e6b
18 hours ago
That was a typo, and believe me, I can take anything you can dish out.

@gepettosplaylists
18 hours ago

@Helen6565e6b your grumpy face says NOT.
1

@Helen6565e6b
18 hours ago
@gepettosplaylists Is that better

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
The host is a little obnoxious and clearly way behind on the way the world works but thank you none the less for giving these men a much needed platform. They are heroes.
26

1 reply

@PadFoot-k9h
2 days ago (edited)
a Little obnoxious? It’s more like full out hostile and pathetic.
4

@jonfoxtrot5135
3 days ago
There is nothing wrong with being a nationalist and advocating for a path to hegenomy in one’s country. Multiculturalism, as well as numerous social policies have never been mandated and the major parties are the architects of those unapproved policies.
20

@HEdied-FORus
1 day ago
My Irish born mother came here in 1956 on a boat, what layed before her were opportunities to build a wonderful life and she has.. she’s 93 now and still lives independently in her own home. She made some good investments and enjoys a ‘part’ pension and never went without. My son and I can’t afford to live and will never have the experience of buying our own home. She fully agrees that there are absolutely too many ‘culturally different’ people here who can’t speak the language. Where has Dick Smith gone too BTW?
7

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
Our country’s been run by clowns for 50+ years now
9

@jasonwalker2950
2 days ago
Sam Newman needs to do a part two with these guys again. This is a record breaking video.
14

1 reply

@evgeny7039
2 days ago
He will never ever touch this subject with a 10 foot pole again. And will come up with an apology in a couple of days for hosting these guys. I am sure he already got the call and is trying to figure a way out for him.
3

@gm5301
3 days ago
Great to see Tom madke it to a podcast outside of our circle. It’s imperative that we reach out to different social spheres of the European people. I pray Tom and the NSN a fruitful and great 2025, Blair as well!
15

@meh.7640
10 hours ago
i love this comment section. we’ll get our countries back one day
7

1 reply

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Took Spain centuries, but they did.

@plopppytheman
3 days ago
Great conversation, thanks!
30

@jessiejordan2853
1 day ago
Awesome interview!
These guys are great!
8

@taylorburke5388
3 days ago
The man said monkey while trying to remember George Floyd’s name. Nice
24

3 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago

5

@rodneytuxedo7559
2 days ago
Caught that too.
2

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago

1

@locmajor6159
1 day ago (edited)
Ended it with “We Love Our Country!” God bless yall man, from southern united states, “the bible belt” baby!
6

@angelahinagates2971
3 days ago
These lads are not driven by hate but by love and they affirm life and wish to protect their own communities, families.
13

@stephenlewis7756
2 days ago
Keep it up guys and thank you!
16

@GondorHorn
3 days ago
Thank you Sam for being transparent and honest.
18

@hadrian73
3 days ago
Excellent interview.
34

@8Matias88
3 days ago
Don’t let Australia became England,Germany, Sweden, France etc.
27

2 replies

@Maza675
2 days ago
It’s well on the way
5

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
The whole of the west is in the same boat.
2

@JamesSmith-w9v2c
2 days ago
These blokes are bang on the money. Sam agrees but is merely saving face.
16

@wazzman7548
3 days ago
Quick delete this before we realize we all agree with Thomas sewell and he’s actually quite rational.
22

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
tick tock
i give it a week

@Aria-gg1oo
1 day ago
Love seeing Blair & Tim! Respect from Canada.
7

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
On Australia day, Adelaide police arrested 16 members of the NsN network for peacefully demonstrating on Australia Day. They didn’t even have their faces covered. They were charged with loitering, and police refused to let them out on bail until they signed conditions saying they would not associate with each other. Never mind that police routinely let foreign criminals out on bail after assault charges; never mind that within the last few months several men charged with child sex offences were let out on bail; and never mind that it goes against the literal law to put restriction of association on bail conditions unless violent crime is involved.
One member has refused to sign the conditions and as a result has been in jail for over a week, without food or basic necessities; this article also fails to mention the man is in his 60s.
The NSN TERRIFIES our ruling class and they are willing to become worse tyrants than they were during covid to silence them.
Its a travesty Sam barely touched on this
16

2 replies

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
I didn’t link the article to avoid YouTube removing my comment as spam.
1

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Blair brought it up about 4 times and Sam ignored him
2

@will2665
3 days ago
Brilliant
26

@douglasfishburne5194
3 days ago
Weird how having people on with views
that are heavily censored and dont get main stream support makes you nervous. Ideas are to be shared, whether you agree or not
16

@myart1336
2 days ago
The documentary ‘Europa: the Last Battle’ has some interesting information on the subject.
15

1 reply

@thepaedophileprofit3062
1 day ago
Ive heard some people describe it as a “must see” documentary, the critics rave about it, that’s what I have been told.
1

@ALS_AustNZ
2 days ago (edited)
These two guys quietly blew Sam’s Boomer mind. Apparently since this interview he’s been trying to walk back & is bagging Blair out. Blair, Tom, Jacob & others have had their X accounts simultaneously suspended obviously at the behest of the gov.
This will only attract more attention & interest in these guys.
Both of these guys have very polished talking points & are very cogent. They know their stuff.
Indians here on fake premise & slowly importing their Dalits is a huge problem.
10

@WaffenSSTotenkopf
2 days ago
NSN – Our guys Down Under!
Strength and Honor, from Norway
7

@user-bc4yt4rm9l
2 days ago
Australia for Europeans
16

@danielarcher1459
3 days ago
Thanks for airing this. There’s a deep truth in what these guys say, but the media just wants to see one side.
10

1 reply

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
And who exactly owns the media?
4

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Everyone needs to download and reupload this before its taken down.
Which it will be, mark my words
20

2 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Yeah, there was a similar Swedish interview and it got taken down
6

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
If Sam caves to pressure and takes it down, I’m all ready to mirror it on my channel. For educational purposes.
6

@jarrid1220
2 days ago
These two gentlemen seem pretty reasonable to me.
11

@DarthAdolf0
2 days ago
Boomer subconsciously knows he’s wrong… Bro is fuming
12

@matthammond1737
4 hours ago
You can see this boomer struggling with a lifetime of programming…
6

@JennyLynn36
3 days ago
Thank you for having these guys on. Great interview.
17

@Shallowchal
3 days ago
Ahhh free speech. It’s worth its weight in gold.
22

@EdwardsComment
2 days ago
This was a pretty interesting conversation, I appreciated it. It was a wild start, straight to the core of the programming – If Nationalism, then Hitler. If Hitler -> Hol*caust! The story used to scatter any organization or dissent against the occupying regimes that despise their own people and hurry to replace them.
7

@taylorburke5388
3 days ago
Well this was a fun watch. So many great points disregarded. Blair is a serious voice of reason. Thomas stands firms on his beliefs and doesn’t let bs disrupt him. Lastly the interviewer didn’t edit the video and made.good on his word
10

@NameThem8888
2 days ago
White countries for the White man.
9

@gmindset224
2 days ago
Sam’s a good sport for having the boys on his show. Big respect, lots of balls.
9

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell, Handsome Truth, Blair Cottrell, Jacob Hersant, Thomas Russo.
I will fight for these men; I’m just waiting for my leaders to call time.
12

1 reply

@Jim-yk9zw
2 days ago
Stop waiting, they have made the call. Get involved now.
2

@alanfaulkner6329
2 days ago
Tom and Blair have just been booted off X. Funny old thing.
10

@Greezy_Monkey
3 days ago
Well done, Tom & Blair. We absolutely need to create a home for Whites in this world. I can not understand how you both hold your composure with the constant derailing of your statements by the, clearly biased interviewers. Good on you for spreading, proper information and a different perspective.
15

@mynameisnobody211
3 days ago
I’m very interested in and support what these fellows said and I’m sure there are many likeminded people in Australia that would agree.
13

@NateHignogs
2 days ago
I agree with Tom and Blair.
10

@88spammer
2 days ago
These comments give me hope for the future of Australia.
12

@jd2966
3 days ago
legendary!
39

@justincredible3501
3 days ago
They make a lot of sense. Hearing them Express their views
and plans makes me look at our society completely differently. We really are under attack. And we really are the only ones who can’t have a homeland of Our Own
8

@Warntator
3 days ago
there is absolutely nothing wrong with racism. be racist or be replaced
16

1 reply

@robertaustin6940
3 days ago
Friggen A.

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
Blair. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much for talking about race and how it’s MUCH MUCH more than skin color.
13

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Sam is doing a fair job however he clearly does not a have a good knowledge of history.
20

@jimunit333
3 days ago
Shut up! Let the lads speak Sam wow! Good on you for having them on , would of loved to hear more from them. This will be your most watched video in only a few days.
11

@Knightt322
12 hours ago
White Australia sounds good to me
6

@natty4316
3 days ago
Well done for doing this buddy!
21

@hh75966
3 days ago
Well done Sammy, for providing a much needed broader platform to hear the voices of Blair and Tom.
Whilst media talking-heads and compromised Political Members wish to destroy our Great Nation, these Men wish to save and restore it.
Australian History in the making
9

@rabbiyitzchaksviben-tzionl3203
3 days ago
Well done sam good interview
23

@WorzelGummage79
2 days ago
Sam came across as a conceited, sarcastic smartarse but at least he had the balls to have these blokes on and to interview them and publish it unedited.
10

@marlboroman9393
2 days ago
These fellas are so right
10

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
Sam: “Racism is about ah um er um ah ee um uh……..muh racism!”
17

3 replies

@ScottRTGM
3 days ago
Sam is a good sport, and he was good at sport too.
I am glad he had these gentlemen on his show to tell their story.
I won’t say he was totally unbiased, but he certainly let them have their say and we can all make up our minds accordingly
13

@stooged579
1 day ago
These lads a spot on, interviewer is a bit of a donkey but at least he put these lads on to get their voice out, we need a part 2
7

@24hmelbournelocksmithdotco6
3 days ago
Hail victory. Hail the NSN
20

@MyDarren13
3 days ago
Never heard your podcast before, and have no interest in listening to you Sam again.
Key note, let your guests speak.
You Sam, like millions of other brain washed sheep have any idea of what is coming. Great work Thomas and Blair
18

2 replies

@justinchappe
3 days ago
It’s Sam’s style of podcast. He let the guests speak. What’s up your arse?

@eahos3768
3 days ago
@justinchappe He was alright. But he kept mumbling and interrupting them.
Sometimes it seems like there is not one argument online where people let eachother speak.

@aydoss4566
2 days ago
Blair and Thomas are great men, the last bastion of true blue Aussies
9

@lsd1649
2 days ago
While i really dont like their views
on Nazism, hitler, the holocaust, or race in general, i would say (as a trumpian liberal) they do have some interesting points.
I have been wondering for a while:
– Why do all other people get to have a homeland (where they are the majority) while all Western people are being made into minorities in their homeland?
– Why is talking about (and practising) multiculturalism considered normal, but if you do it for monoculturalism, then you are extreme?
– why are all ethnic groups allowed to openly advocate for their own groups success, but white people (who won ww2 and saved the world) are called supremist if they do the same?
I recently read a book called ‘the unknown warriors’by Nicholas Pringle. It documents how ww2 veterans felt about how britain turned out, and it was a very depressing read.
10

3 replies

@lsd1649
2 days ago
I’ve also been wondering about the immigration narrative.
We are told that we need more immigration in Western countries because of low birthrates, which means we are being forced into a breeding competition for the right to our homeland (which we lose as migrant have higher birth rates). However, all Western nations have laws against introducing non indiginous species because they may outcompete (out breed) indiginous species?
I know we’re not animals, but it seems odly hypocritical that a cow has more rights not to be replaced in the West than the indiginous western people….
5

@Adam-jr4lx
2 days ago
@lsd1649 folks have cognitive dissonance. invasive species are bad but multiracial is good because that’s fighting against racism.
2

@lsd1649
2 days ago

@Adam-jr4lx well that is the common argument, about it being anti-racist etc, but more and more I find myself struggling to accept this argument.
For example, why is it considered anti-racist to let infinite amounts of people into your country, but racist to want all people to have their own homeland?
In the first situation, while it may appear accepting, all that is happening is that one group (westerners) are losing land and their culture to foreign groups who still have all of their homeland. However, in the second instance, all groups keep their homeland and can work together (through trade and sharing) to improve each other’s homeland without disspossession.
Surely the second is less racist and more equal?
Then again, I’m probably overthinking things . I’m sure someone will be able to see the flaw in my logic.
3

@brendezen
3 days ago
Warm up the planes. Hundred percent agree.
12

@drivingintothedesertuntilt3202
3 days ago
This sort of debate should be on q and a
16

@mickyss7766
2 days ago
Us wogs support these guys
18

5 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Legend
5

@griffin1366
2 days ago
Except when you’re deported .. ?
1

@mickyss7766
2 days ago

@griffin1366 European my friend.

@griffin1366
2 days ago
@mickyss7766 Well you aren’t informed then. You will be going as well if these guys ever get their wishes.

@mickyss7766
2 days ago

@griffin1366 they clearly note in the video with sam, European only.

@KHANAGE1311
3 days ago (edited)
The fact that Sam had the guts to give them a voice, I’m subscribing.

And, these two men speak for a LOT MORE AUSTRALIANS than most people realise.
Bravo to Thomas and Blair.
3

@elijahbrown1734
3 days ago
BASED SAM NEWMAN!!
24

@theycallme_nightmaster
2 days ago (edited)
o/ support from USA. Still waiting for the day people learn the difference between the words “Nationalism” and “Supremacy”
7

@evgeny7039
3 days ago
No wonder these two will never have a fair go at channel 9. They make too much sense.
13

@Tachibana-p9e
3 days ago
Host ruined it by interrupting constantly.
15

@theoffender3113
3 days ago (edited)
If you’ve dug a little deeper into the history of the Australian continent you’d find that the Australian Aboriginal weren’t the first people here.. there was a smaller race of people here that stood about one metre tall.. they came down from South East Asia/Timor and predominantly live in North Queensland.. it is believed they were wiped out by around 30 to 40 thousand years ago by what now is known as the Australian Aboriginals we now know .. and some pigmies were still around only up till 3000 years ago.. the very last ones lived in the Cardwell region up till the late 1800’s
17

4 replies

@hollargirl-w1e
3 days ago
It is men such as these who will be remembered as heros. They are great leaders.
8

@shankspony9369
3 days ago
In 1900 European peoples were 30% of the worlds population. Today we are just 7% and falling.
10

1 reply

@Keribou109
3 days ago
We need to make people aware of this
7

@DaisyDate
2 days ago
Love this. I hope the NSN grows more and more. Keeping speaking the truth .
7

@HoisinCrispyOwl
2 days ago
Good job mate.
The truth is, these lads are the only guys fighting for the Australia our ancestors founded and died for.
11

@noglobo
3 days ago
Cheers Sam, it takes guts to platform these two. Thank you for allowing them to speak at length.
6

@marklambert8881
3 days ago
TRUTH matter’s more than me, and U.
21

@Goy-wc8od
3 days ago
Hail Tom and the NSN. Let us all aspire to be as great as these men and by the gods we’ll have our homes again. Hail victory
6

@conlitras3379
3 days ago
“I want a noble Australia” you know what, me too!
10

@jolheb9091
23 hours ago
Many countries are actually on the way to this sort of thinking already, its not hard to look it up and see why they are doing it. Myself I agree to an extent
5

@stoveone4031
3 days ago
Brave of you to do this, good stuff. These lads are solid
14

@GD-ev7lb
2 days ago
Good stuff. Australia can’t be for everyone, if Israel can be for Jews, surely Australia can be for European people who settled here.
We have our flag and it represents our nation. Not the nation of everyone.
8

@jordane19969
1 day ago
Ben shapiro people are not going to like this one. Shut it down
12

@cjaksson
3 days ago
Team Australia or GTFO!
14

@michellejohnson7683
2 days ago
two level headed blokes saying things we are conditioned to turn away from, and if you have that feeling like i do, where did it come from? Are we being brainwashed to dislike ourselves?
9

@SerenityNow22
2 days ago
Praying for these bold men from Canada . We are in the same boat over here
4

@cricketer121
3 days ago
An honourable interview
12

@peterpepper2983
2 days ago
T sewell articulation maxxing. Respect the airplanes, respect the remigration! Love your own folk. Real Nationalism forever.
6

@Mr.X__777
3 days ago
Love you Sammy!
25

@eddieramone7619
3 days ago
Much respect to the two guests. Great guys, very reasonable.
8

@kanefleming
3 days ago
Hail Victory. Australia For The White Man
15

@Peter-i1y
1 day ago
One question you have to ask are these guys speaking truth? And if they are why aren’t they allowed to speak!
6

@CKyIe
3 days ago
Hail Sam Newman!
o/
Absolute legend, allowing these guys to speak.
11

@securitron5
22 hours ago
To the largely irrelevant, condescending boomer host guy:
Let your guests finish their thoughts and stop interrupting them. It’s embarrassing to witness. The lads did excellent despite that.
6

@madforit2
3 days ago
I have to say these 2 guys sound very reasonable and agree with their points. Seems a wild overreaction to demonise them so much
13

@Bill87762
2 days ago
Thomas is the most succinct messenger we have now- he’s not American but our struggle emanates from a worldwide attack on our people.
6

1 reply

@jza9962
3 days ago
You can’t teach a Boomer new tricks. Still, I give this video a right arm up o/
14

@DarkStar27183
1 day ago (edited)
2025 is the start of the golden age. Trump, and more importantly these blokes, are just the beginning
5

@lonnybonani9603
3 days ago
Hail Sewell and Cotrell, real men
12

@alsturrock8940
1 day ago
‘We love our country’. That’s a problem for some it would seem. Well played for having them on. Free speech lives but only just.
6

@rustyshakleford5776
3 days ago
Interviewer is so patronizing. Never heard of these guys before but they seem very reasonable, thoughtful and well spoken.
11

@DeepPurple-gr6wj
2 days ago
Kudos to you for having the balls to host these fellas.
They are right about everything they said.
5

@HehdhsBsnajs
3 days ago
Blair for Senate 2030
10

@ender8170
11 hours ago
Fantastic video. Wish the interviewer wasn’t so rude and interjected constantly. Otherwise thank you for putting them on the air.
4

@GlobalistJuice
2 days ago
I don’t know… I think Tom and Blair may have a new recruit today.haha ha! But seriously, I give the interviewer credit for speaking with these men on this day, and I can see he’s genuinely interested in the reasons behind their cause, albeit he says he’s not sympathetic to that cause – and even though I’ve never laid eyes (or ears) on Mr. Sam Newman before, he’s not a stupid man, he sees the writing on the wall. Unfortunately as with many of his generation, there’s a collective knee-jerk outrage reaction to anyone countering the fantastical history of WWII of 80yrs ago, and it’s engrained in his generation throughout all their lives (I know, as I’m also a “Boomer”, although a few years younger at age 68), and the majority of that generation cannot ever come to terms with the reality of that war, for fear of retaliation and moreso, most are of the camp that it’s just too late in their years of life to be bothered to investigate the story. Great interview, Tom and Blair are fine men who love their country, thank you for sharing it.
10

@Mothy2014
3 days ago
I can’t believe this is still on YT 15 hours later.
Conversations like this need to be heard.
Freedom of speech!!!
7

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
give it time bro

@thomassinclair731
3 days ago
American here! This is a great interview. These men look and sound absolutely normal — or what ought to be normal, and will be normal! Are they scheduled to appear on Tucker Carlson?
11

1 reply

@Ruby-ss6mu
2 days ago
That would be a fantastic idea!
1

@ballpython324
21 hours ago
Amazing interview thank you for this
4

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
2 men talk to a walking vaccine injury
17

1 reply

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
savage
1

@mcmelissa6062
3 days ago
Great interview Sam. I hope you endeavour to revise some of our history books and begin to understand that we have been lied to and indoctrinated into believing the solitary narrative written by the victors. At the end of the day, I think most Australians can agree that multiculturalism is a failed experiment that no one asked for.
8

@organismseven3700
2 days ago
Sam Newman is an old-school Conservative with a small “c”.
He has had this mindset his entire life.
Being exposed to National Socialism ideology is almost impossible for him to process.
You can see the cogs in his mind going haywire during the entire conversation.
At various points you can see actual brain freezes occur.
A reset button seems to be pressed and he starts to try and process what he is hearing.
Tries, and fails over and over again.
Most of his generation are incapable of changing how they think.
It is sad, because most of them do have good hearts and they have kind natures.
But having “good hearts and kind natures” has brought us to this point.
The younger generation need to have hard hearts and strong resolve.
Otherwise, we are finished!
11

@coreyworthingtonii9230
2 days ago
40:03
That’s a very good point – we don’t need people bringing their foreign wars to our shores.
6

@natty4316
3 days ago
Well done for doing this, you should maybe question yourself as to why it’s more upsetting to you to discuss the historical accuracy of an event that happened 80year ago when you’re actually in the middle of being replaced by the 3rd world
13

@thedaily30
11 hours ago
Sam, you’re an embarrassment to our ancestors. Shame on you for trying to throw Blair under the bus after this interview. Repulsive behavior.
5

@slickrick1913
1 day ago
Props to Sam for airing this, especially unedited, even if he was an insufferable boomer for the whole thing. He really doesn’t have the intellectual and historical foundation for this discussion. Thankfully there are still strong and sane men in the world like Tom and Blair.
10

2 replies

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
It is vital we never become south Africa.
8

@jadeharvey1265
3 days ago
Great and honest interview!
14

@Tachibana-p9e
3 days ago
These guys sound completely reasonable to me.
8

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
As of 9.30pm EST Feb 4, both Blair and Tom have been suspended from X
Blair’s account was still up this morning, gone by the arvo.
Tom’s only vanished within the last hour
It seems my other comment about this is being auto deleted
10

2 replies

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
This should tell you everything you need to know about what our “rulers” are able to accomplish when they sense a threat
This is not a coincidence
9

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Have you seen the photo-op recently (as in, today) posted there of Mileikowsky / “Netanyahu” (left), Trump (centre), and Musk (right)?… For that’s all you need to know about that LARP’ing brownshirt’s, /chan/ tier trolling.
3

@toneabet6252
2 days ago
Great interview Sam, really interesting to get the perspective from people passionate about Australia.
4

@matt79hz
3 days ago
Imagine all the logic ..
Bravo
12

@Roogirl1010
3 days ago
God bless you Sam for having the courage, decency and open mindedness to open up this discussion and let the boys speak. History is written by the winners and look at what has happened to our once great nation…what a mess it is today…that tells us plenty
6

@thaNZdon
3 days ago
Bloody brilliant jobs boys – blood and honor
10

@FLmetalhead
2 days ago
Heil Thomas Sewell and Blair Cottrell!!!
8

@mocarlyle7713
3 days ago
From South Africa, Tom is 100000000% correct. Sad to see an old person who cannot observe the negative changes over time.
10

@danielarcher1459
1 day ago
I haven’t seen the like/dislike ratio but I bet it’s >95% positive. There is a huge demand for this conversation amongst the people – it is the elephant in the room that no-one’s talking about! Our so-called democracy only allows the conversation to go one way right now and that has to change.
8

1 reply

@brent5310
1 day ago
It is. There are browser add-ons that bring the dislike button back.

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Blair is the better spokesman.
14

2 replies

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
wait till you hear Joel Davis
1

@Student____2025__1
1 day ago

@ Joel Davis is outstanding. Big fan of his work. He’s very talented, sharp and a great communicator. Also seems like an honest and decent person.

@MitchytooSlick
2 days ago
Awesome interview these guys are the future for white aussies
8

@sixty5stoney
3 days ago
SAM NEWMAN ANGLO SAXON POWER
13

@azteacher26
9 hours ago (edited)
46:04 he called George Floyd a monkey. LMAO. Sam you’re based.
5

1 reply

@ihatserbs1771
5 hours ago
blood memories of colonizing such creatures

@MGoogle3146
3 days ago
Sam I respect your ability to hold an interview with people you clearly personally demonise, unfortunately though, that demonization prevented you from having a civil discussion which would have been more enjoyable to watch. You as an interviewer did not come across as a reasonable man wanting to hear their position.
9

1 reply

@kenouif
3 days ago
Agree. He’s usually good at interviewing but he stumbled on this one.
2

@ZachAsaD
17 hours ago
Guy in the red is a few sandwiches short of a picnic
4

@Thomas-jg2fm
3 days ago
Australia for the White man
10

@XRedDemon27
2 days ago
Respect for having these true patriots on. History shall repeat itself
3

@lidiaspazzard
3 days ago (edited)
While I appreciate Sam having them on, this conversation was totally above his level of understanding. He would have benefitted from looking into this topic a bit more before this episode. Though it does serve as an example of what it is like trying to explain these ideas to boomers and mainstream thinkers. Their minds just go straight to the points that they have been brainwashed to believe and won’t move beyond thm.
9

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
how frustrating is it
psychologists call it anchor bias
usually the bigger the ego the harder to be more fluid in your thinking
High IQ people are susceptible to it
TLDR: Basically your IQ is being ruined by your EQ

@danas3765
1 day ago
Tom Sewell is my hero. I wish we had men like him, Davis, Blair and Hersant here in America.
4

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago (edited)
So by extension Sam wants the domestic population to erode their own rights, granted to them by the very foundation of their law the Magna Carta, under the predication of “civic nationalism” because two foreign communities to whom the primary demographic have absolutely no allegiance to, cannot refrain from using violence due to hurty words.
Explain to me again how competing cultural and racial demographics are a benefit to homogenous, domestic populations?
10

@leparmentiergaeru1998
2 days ago
Based gentlemen
7

@Liveleadplayer70
3 days ago
Bravo..more more
11

@acesneed3104
3 days ago
Thanks for having Tom and Blair on. We are not going down without a fight.
6

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
But I can’t say White Lives Matter. Not allowed ??
I am.80 and would join these guys.
10

@retter2critical
2 hours ago
Sam wont back down and be forced to do an apology tour after this … Oh wait.
2

3 replies

@Fahrenheit2030
2 days ago
Amazing show and greetings from America! You Aussies are lucky to have these men. We are losing our countries. Here in America we had illegal COMMUNISTS blocking the freeways telling us they are going to rip up our constitution. WESTERN COUNTRIES FOR EUROPEANS!!
10

@Yougottalaugh-p9u
3 days ago
Hail Tom Blair Joel and all the brave men of the NSN who are a few brave men willing to stand up for the survival of white Australia.
7

@LordOfSweden
3 days ago (edited)
Both heroes. Support to them both from Sweden. You interupt too much tho. You need to structure your interviews better.
13

@gary1705
3 days ago
It was Arthur Caldwell that was an advocate for the White Australia policy
7

@freddledgruntbuggly9408
3 days ago
GET CLIPPING LADS
12

@MashedApplePie
3 days ago (edited)
I never knew the guests would be so well spoken
7

1 reply

@neilr4867
3 days ago
Most people don’t. They’re very intelligent, well read men who could run rings around pretty much any politician.
2

@Fury851
2 days ago
We need men like Blair and Tom in Britain!
I would be optimistic about our future then
15

2 replies

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Blair came over a few months ago to speak at a Patriotic Alternative conference hosted by leader Mark Collett, check them out
3

@Fury851
2 days ago

@Keribou109 yeah I see it. Just wish his speech was longer

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
I support those guys.
Nobody else in politics cares about Australians.
Can we put them in charge of the lnp?
9

1 reply

@RedemptionDenied666
3 days ago (edited)
Interviewer is not responding to talking points and is changing the subject and interrupting the guests constantly with emotionally charged accusatory statements. Having them on was a brave enough move however it could have been handled more seriously.
9

3 replies

@kenouif
3 days ago
Exactly.
3

@neilr4867
3 days ago
It’s Sam Newman. He’s just like that. Always has been!
2

@user-pr7pd9wd5b
3 days ago
he agrees with a lot of it he’s just being an interviewer and providing pushback. should be glad he had them on. it was good.
1

@garygary2118
2 days ago
Blair and Thomas are great men making so much sense,Sam you sound like Jo Biden.
8

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Go read the talmud…and be horrified
14

@ginjabear6664
1 day ago
Thank you for having Tom and Blair on. They’re awesome
4

@river6634
3 days ago
Hail victory. Australia for the white man.
9

@greekgod41
1 day ago
Gave this video 12 minutes, but had to stop because the interviewer was pathetic, he kept interrupting, his speech was umming and aaaahing all the time. I think he is far too old and he let his bias against Australian Nationalism corrupt the interview
6

@theyatsyspam
3 days ago
they’re… cogent, normal people
11

@EyDolf
2 days ago
Tom and Blair sound wonderful! I’ll have to look into the things they discussed, very thought provoking.
4

@ness111555
3 days ago
Great work Lads.
10

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago
Im 12 minutes in and this host is effing horrible. He keeps tripping over the Hitler quagmire and doesn’t let Thomas and Blaire say their piece.
3

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Definitely they are winning you over Sammy
10

@rayWinstone-ud9th
3 days ago
What’s odd is that every western country has this problem and it only really started after ww2.
6

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Exactly

@Ralphski-r6c
3 days ago
Great Interview
11

@MarketInsights-jq3cl
2 days ago
well done lads
7

@DrillEntertainmentNetwork
2 days ago
Terribly conducted interview but its good to hear Tom and Blair
11

@winstonwolf5706
2 days ago
This dude is peak boomer.
7

@kochamoplamerive3868
3 days ago
Awesome
11

@Jackhands0me9
3 days ago
It’s good to see someone giving them a platform to state their views. This is supposed to be a free country, if someone’s ideas are ridiculous what harm is there in letting the speak.
Seems the government and media don’t want t people to hear them for a reason..
6

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
You just hate agreeing with them on anything, don’t you?
9

@GerNiels
3 days ago
Australia for the white man
8

@farright118
3 days ago
15:00 good question blair. Alot of people agree with the 60’s but dont release it was a white australia back then
12

1 reply

@stompinknowledge3968
5 hours ago
Sam, I feel you did the right thing having these guys on. If we’re to counter extremism, no matter what side, this is all we need to achieve that – allowing representatives of viewpoints to speak and the public to tease out their own perspective from the horses mouth. It shouldn’t be normalised that Governments legislate to shut down ANY speech on basis of belief or group association – no matter how good the reasoning may seem in the moment, its a consistent opening move of despotism. We’re not exempt in Australia from being drawn down that path in small steps. America has free speech as a right, and it seems to me that its reliably allowed the individual to live in better conscience where that right is exercised responsibly and accountably. Our attitude in Australia ought to be that we’re able to steward the weight of discourse on our own shoulders.
Kudos, Sam.

@110inshallah
3 days ago
For the algorithm
14

@Michi444-8
2 days ago
great interview – we need to hear these voices.
6

@Liv1ngTehDream
3 days ago
Could have watched a few more hours of this
11

@darrensmith88008
1 day ago
22,000 views
Sam. Highest ever! You just gotta have them back mate! Don’t let the jewish elite shut down your freedom of speech mate
4

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Not sure if you read the comments Mr. Newman, but I believe you asked a good question about hate speech which I wish they answered. You are absolutely correct that “hate speech” can fan the flames and turn into physical violence and your example of Palestinians vs. Jews was very apt as well.
The question then becomes: is it worthwhile to import these groups of people only for the government to have to babysit them and their foreign feuds? Is it worth importing them if it necessitates censoring the speech and even the thoughts of Australians? If you have to institute tyranny for foreigners to live comfortably in your nation, then by default I don’t believe they are making it a better place at all.
13

@fordstrokers
2 days ago
I have no idea who the interviewer is, but he is quite the insufferable boomer.
8

1 reply

@MidlifeRenaissanceMan
3 days ago
15 minutes up. Waiting for the screeching to begin
14

@TrimbakkiFonElsass
2 days ago
Great interview, thanks for giving them a chance to speak
4

@Eli-xt7gn
3 days ago
Blair & Tom are like good cop, bad cop lmao
9

@zaza3575
2 days ago
Sam just reminds me of that UK presenter that talks over his guests. Exciteable Sam. Interesting guests, learned a lot.
7

1 reply

@someguy516
2 days ago
He’s uncomfortable but he’s courageous and noble for giving them time and space to speak
1

@PenitentPiglet
3 days ago
Terrible interviewer. Kept interrupting. Boys did well in spite of it.
10

@talk2thoran
3 days ago
Congrats to Sam and the team for supporting free speech!
6

@Martiniddelina
3 days ago
Apart from the Hitler bit and the holocaust, I agree with them especially the part that we cannot afford a roof over our head.
34

9 replies

@Maza675
3 days ago
That’s why those subjects are always brought up first, so you batten down the hatches and become somewhat resistant to everything else they have to talk about.
20

@alpine7891
3 days ago
Maybe you should look into it. We’ve been lied to.
23

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Research
11

@Charless_Martel
3 days ago
just a matter of time untill the veil will be lifted.
16

@fascistzoomer
3 days ago
Have you actually tried to dive into the topic?
6

@HuWhiteDeath
3 days ago (edited)
Our (White peoples) well being is more important than obsessing over WW2, and try to amend for it or appease non-Whites that cry about it all the time, or any other historical period for that matter.
6

@sianbaldock9670
3 days ago
I totally agree

@littlefox2324
3 days ago
read some David Irving books. You might surprise yourself
2

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Now ask yourself why something that supposedly happened thousands of miles away 80 years ago to non European people is the reason you’re not supposed to entertain these men’s talking points
2

@TheDaskell
3 days ago
After this interview you can guarantee there will be a lot more members of the NSO. Excellent
interview Sam.
5

@freyast2213
3 days ago
He’s 80??? Dam he’s a handsome man for being that old. I’m not familiar with him before now, it was a decent interview. He obviously disagrees with them, but that’s to be expected I suppose.
10

1 reply

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
i think what makes this so funny is how passionate tom is and how old sammy is and how blair just sits there smiling, its like a marx brother sketch
6

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Indeed…
Isn’t it just.

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Not just about colour it’s all about culture
13

3 replies

@Itsmeetc
3 days ago
Culture is downstream from race
19

@imperialhonorguard1483
3 days ago
culture comes from race
14

@AeneasSaturn
3 days ago
Race>Culture>Politics
1

@redoz9768
3 days ago
Great podcast. Thanks for letting these guys be heard.
6

@greenygreen8253
3 days ago

20

@TTJ876
7 hours ago
Well done lads
2

@Natsoc04
2 days ago
Thomas and Blair are correct. Watch Europa the Last Battle
19

3 replies

@Comatosedpeanut
2 days ago
Where can I actually watch that movie?

@Student____2025__1
2 days ago
That movie is full of inaccuracies. See Keith Woods’ analysis of it.
2

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Stu Peter’s
Occupied

@troyhier6509
1 day ago
very interesting interview Sam, can we have a follow up?
5

@hosannainthehighest
3 days ago
This guys a terrible interviewer
10

1 reply

@noglobo
3 days ago
No he isn’t, he is clearly worried about the backlash but we should be thankful to him for giving them a platform.
5

@cl4998
2 days ago
Viewer from the USA, great episode!
6

@MrForeign14
3 days ago
o/
9

@henrikjohansson1252
2 days ago
Fully agree with Tom and the boys. Stay strong lads.
Hails from Sweden
5

@berimbolo8178
3 days ago
Christ is King
10

@rickyseedo4067
3 days ago
Great interview, very reasonable and quite interesting.
6

@Jacksonlamb-y2z
2 days ago
Scroll thruu and see who the majority support
6

@200archiver
3 days ago
amazing podcast
8

@Jason-BMWM5
3 days ago
Well spoken gents
8

@TheExcessMaleBrotherhood
2 days ago
Patriots. They put Sam to shame, can’t disagree with anything they said
5

@filled_soda
3 days ago
Thomas, Blair, Joel and Jacob are great.
7

@Mrflashydude
3 days ago
Thanks for this great interview!
6

@Truthseekerstv17
3 days ago
About time we had an open discussion, we don’t have that anymore. It’s refreshing to speak free of the way anyone feels, without being victimised. That was the old Australia. Listen and respect one’s opinion. Australia has become soft, while we have to respect others ways of life, but not get it on return. Don’t celebrate Christmas it offends, don’t celebrate Mother’s Day, it offends, don’t celebrate Anzac Day, don’t celebrate Australia Day. Wake up people. Stand up for your country. Standards need to be bought back into our country. Remember the time you had to pass a ENGLISH test before
Begin accepted into our great county. The Greeks, Italian and Maltese had to do it. You shouldn’t feel uncomfortable in your own country when you can communicate with others. You get your nails done and the Chinese or Vietnamese is speaking there language laughing and not even acknowledging your existence as a paying customer.
Don’t agree with the aboriginal, but they would tend to like there own culture & it’s a beautiful culture when you learn it. They also agree with Australia being overpopulated with immigrants. Listen to each other and we can all make change. Great interview
7

@puggs1
1 day ago (edited)
Sam you are a terrible host. When you ask your guest a question let them answer instead of butting in
8

@ShaneStrtachan
2 days ago
Glad I watched this.
8

@rikusuoraan
1 day ago
interviewer is interrupting too much, great talk otherwise
6

@derbenutzer5958
2 days ago
Sewell:”I want both of them deported!”
Thanks to everybody involved, was a great listening. T and B made an interesting and fun combination, both did great S created a thrilling debate
4

@dumpsterdiver2069
2 days ago
This interview has been WAY past due and I appreciate you bringing Tom and Blair on your show indeed BUT, your interruption of them is unconscionable! For the listener, it’s absolutely TORTURE and beyond disrespectful that you do this!
8

@mariannepleming8216
3 days ago (edited)
I remember while catching the bus at 5.20am and I raised/heiled my arm to tell the bus where I was. Was I in the wrong. Honestly I don’t know how those boys can sit there and let Sam just rattle on, he is coming across as very dumb. He needs to just sit back and listen and not interupt the boys.
8

@leeroberts9091
2 days ago
Sam’s a bit old these days, his brain doesn’t quite work properly anymore.
8

@volkanphoenix5441
3 days ago
Thank you for allowing these great men on your platform. Great job Thomas Sewell.
2

@TeutonicTrickster
3 days ago
Awesome, loved it.
Great podcast
6

@tomzablee
2 days ago
Interesting interview well done for having the bravery to give them a platform
3

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago (edited)
39:44, let me make this clear:
Levantines (Jews or Palestinians or any other non-European foreigner) have no right to bring their national or ethnic squabbles to our lands.
6

3 replies

@stigcc
3 days ago
No.

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago
@stigcc I mistyped: they have no right*
1

@stigcc
3 days ago
@AntiquityIsResurgent Glad you cleared that out!
1

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
Sam is brainwashed
9

1 reply

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
He speaks poison
2

@Woden81
1 day ago
Nationalism and National Socialism are distinct ideologies. While National Socialism incorporated certain nationalist elements, nationalism itself is not inherently tied to National Socialism. In the Australian context, nationalism represents pride in the nation’s Anglo-Saxon and Celtic heritage, as well as a commitment to preserving its traditions and cultural identity.
3

@Ubermensch88.
2 days ago
Good on you for allowing them to express their beliefs, Sam.
4

@100StrongManly
1 day ago
Listening to this before the esafety commission takes it down
6

1 reply

@100StrongManly
1 day ago
Add on: I couldn’t be more against this idea, but I believe in freedom of speech. This especially extends to those who you disagree with

@sassenack1990
3 days ago
Tom Price was a distant cousin of mine. Americans and Australians are one. Throw off the yoke. Love yourselves. You built a wonderland out of a wasteland. We did in the US as well. English, Irish, Scots, and Weish do this. It’s built into our DNA. If you join the military, you’re taught to “improve your foxhole.
6

@brucebogtrotter3430
2 days ago
You made too much sense for him. He wants to join you but does not have the courage!
6

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
>”I’ve been to Dachau”
Yiddish-to-English translation: ‘I have been inculcated in the sensationalism of “The Narrative” and, therefore, can only view histories which I have never taken the time to research, through an emotional lens.”
4

@Devoted_Catholic777
1 day ago (edited)
Happy you all sat down and had a talk we need more of this
2

@ausniannative3055
3 days ago
Thank you Sam Newman
8

@dirtymcgreg
3 days ago
You’re a brave man sam. Bravo
8

@JT-5525_
2 days ago
Australia for the white man !!!
5

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Thank you!
4

@PHRCproject
3 days ago
Great Interview, Thanks Sam for having the guys on
6

@ThisIsJamesL
2 days ago
Odd that Blair and Thomas both had their x accounts zapped just after this
7

1 reply

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
why did elon hitler musk ban his own soldiers

@SammyG-123
3 days ago
Looking good for 80 mate!
7

@zarathustratv9114
3 days ago
Thank you for doing this interview, Sam
6

@cjplanes
3 days ago
its kinda funny how newman interrupts sewell but stops talking when blair talks, its the muscles lol
6

@ScanLinkV
3 days ago
Well done for doing this Sam.
8

@ralphkramden2826
2 days ago
So Sam, how’s the comment section look to you? Starting to realize that Aussies don’t want brown immigration and White people simply want to live amongst their own? Much like the brown people who come to White countries all live on the same streets/blocks/communities??
6

@SharkyyHamilton
2 days ago
Sam, there are a bunch of positive comments on here about your guests
7

1 reply

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Isn’t it great
7

@kenoats5501
3 days ago
Interesting topic.
May God bless these men and their fight.
Australians need to rise
3

@allisonhughes4348
1 day ago
Gees Sam I thought you said Blair barged his way in and yet here you are having a bloody hour long fireside chat with him. You’re a massive BS artist mate
8

@LawrenceForbes
3 days ago
Sam: Musk didn’t do it as the Nazi salute. Blair: Well, how do you know, have you spoken with him? crickets Love it…
4

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Imagine the juice would be fuming now
8

@Juiceb0xable
2 days ago
First answer total fucking legend move
5

@justindl4459
1 day ago
Bro is bryce Mitchell’s hero
5

@joeypaige
1 day ago
Love these boys!!!
4

@Jay-fp8iy
3 days ago
Free speech is great thanks Sam
8

@martyhoare7558
3 days ago
Very brave Sam. An interesting conversation.
7

@unbelievableproductions
2 days ago
Documentary; EuropaTheLastBattle
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxFMJPkhpN4z8IgQaIiO0TJ8cB5bE15QfW
7

@birchtreebattle7153
3 days ago
These gents are spot on.
7

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Long Live Australia!
5

@bperez8656
2 days ago
I agree that interviewers order of questions is bad.
Long live free speech regardless of whether you agree or not
5

@MH-db7hl
2 days ago
Alfred Rosenberg was a highly intelligent compassionate and brave man – worth reading his memoirs which were written on death row Nuremberg
6

@WMP-xy5eu
4 hours ago
If you want to know who controls you, look at who you’re not allowed to criticise.
K Strom.
3

1 reply

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Order, promotes peace.
3

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
How long before the people who cannot be named get this video taken down. “Shut it down…the people know…..!!!”
6

1 reply

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
Give it 48hrs, hit piece will be on 9 by the end of the week
3

@plasmapanasonic4741
3 days ago
Awesome work Sam, truely great stuff. Youre a good man.
5

@Charless_Martel
3 days ago
Thomas said he is the only one speaking English in the park, after that he asks what reason he has to make it white.
5

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
If this goes down, I am ready and primed to mirror it.
7

1 reply

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Any “controversial” uploads should always be backed up as a matter of course… It’s been that way for well over a decade.
1

@sebastienengelhardt
2 days ago
Sam’s noticing of the spiritual enemy will no doubt increase tenfold in the coming days. Pray for the boomers during this turning of the tide
4

@vivrowe2763
1 day ago
Well I have to say this was excellent and glad I watched it. When MSM don’t like something, I know I will.
2

@aclark3959
3 days ago
Why was the interviewer so absolutely rude and annoying
9

2 replies

@BillyBurnsfield
3 days ago
He’s shit scared of being cancelled or something
3

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
@BillyBurnsfield He was cancelled 5yrs ago for saying Geroege Floyd was a POS on air
1

@pinkpoodlepaloma
2 days ago
At long last, a brave interview, thank you
3

@Rucky888
2 days ago
I wont comment on THIS per se
I will simply note, in a society where it is legal AND moral to terminate a baby up to the moment of birth, then there is NOTHING any of these 3 can SAY this could be called unacceptable
5

@milenkovicmarija91
1 day ago
This presenter is a jerk
7

@KissSlowlyLoveDeeply-pm2je
2 hours ago
man Sam is such a passive aggressive woman. he can’t handle any confrontation and just resorts to snark and irony.
1

@MrChickenChoker1
1 day ago
Like it or hate it 3 men that love our Country
4

@bloodresin
3 days ago
Great video, Enjoyed the back and forth, never seen this show before, but as you had them botg on in good faith and let them speak, I’ll subscribe, clearly a person of character
5

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Proud Aussies.
6

@PhilsMyFriend
3 days ago
Sending love from Dixieland \o
8

@ThisIsJamesL
2 days ago
I had the pleasure of meeting Blair and Joel here in England at the PA conferences.
3

@petegibson79
8 hours ago
I came here from a social media feed as there has apparently been quite the backlash regarding these two men’s appearance on this podcast. Allegedly, they have both had their social media accounts cancelled after the appearance. This caught my attention, so I came to listen. I wanted to see what was so terrible about these men. There’s a great deal that concerns me here.
Good for you for having them on and talking to them. I should hope you haven’t experienced any backlash for having them on the podcast, as you heard them out and you challenged them on their opinions. I hate the fact that you were obviously concerned about the fallout that could happen from you sitting in a room and talking to them. That’s all you did, you sat in a room and talked to them like adults should be able to do! What is the problem with that? Their opinions and ideas are interesting and the fact that they hold them is interesting. I’d love to talk to these guys, they’re different, and their ideas are challenging. I’m an adult and I can make my own assessment as to whether I agree with their ideas or not, and I can counter their thoughts with my own ideas. The point I’m making here is this cancel culture, convicted in the court of public opinion for the heinous crime of “wrongthink” notion, is not good, as I get the strong impression that they’d be more open to hearing a counter argument to their ideas than the mainstream is to allowing them to even speak. What is more sinister, the ideas these men have, or a mainstream culture that would snuff out their voices and thoughts so that nobody can hear them or know that they exist?….Adults can make up their own mind. A culture that says that we shouldn’t be allowed to hear a voice says that we are unintelligent, immature, gullible, and incapable of making our own decisions and incapable of composing our own arguments. That sort of censorship and thought control is very concerning. As long as we allow that culture to exist, we validate that culture’s unspoken argument against us.
As for their ideas. My assessment would be that I don’t really find them threatening per se (Jesus Christ, straight into a question about Hitler!….Oof, that was a hard pill to swallow, but good for you for asking it). I would argue that their arguments do step into the world of “supremacy”, but mostly don’t stray beyond representation for a particular ethnic group. Why shouldn’t these men be allowed to speak up for their ethnic group, every other ethnic group has representation. They point out obvious double standards that I think it’s impossible to argue against. Many would argue that it’s racist to allow these ideas to exist………Dear God, it’s equally racist to NOT allow their ideas to exist.
The single biggest problem with their ideas is the idea that we should act upon them (deportations based on skin colour, if you’re not european you shouldn’t have free speech or representation, etc). That is the supremacy part, and in a sane, humane world, that cannot happen as it’s just not realistic. We need to be respectful of each other, and each other’s ideas. The more we push against a group and the more devalue them and their ideas, and the more we hate them, then the more weight we add to the pendulum and that weighted pendulum will swing back at us faster and harder when it does swing back. What I mean is, if we keep pushing this toxic cancel culture idea, and keep denying representation to people like this, then we keep adding to their argument, which will in turn add weight to their movement – we may find ourselves in a world where supremacist ideas start to become the dominant ideas, and we’ll only have ourselves to blame for it. Differences exist in people and cultures, and we need to accept that and start focusing upon how we resolve those differences rather than the differences themselves; Whether he’s aware or not, the guy in the blue shirt (Thomas) actually demonstrated a level of insight on that that seems to have been lost on us as a whole (Aboriginal people, and European settlers may not accept each other’s cultures…so they don’t have to exist in a cultural melting pot, but it’s important that they communicate with each other to find a middle ground that allows both worlds to exist separately, but side by side……of course, he contradicted this by saying that all non european settlers have to be removed from the Australian continent…..people are nuanced, they’re allowed to be, not everything makes sense but we could gain something if we tease out the parts that do). Until we start talking about race, religion, culture in a meaningful way, we will get nowhere further than the point we’re at……which is being at each other’s throats about our differences; demonize these men as much as we like, but I think they’ve stepped outside the comfort zone and are talking about race in a more meaningful way than most of us are: they are nazis (unashamedly so, they said so themselves), but they’re not stupid, and if we dismiss them as stupid and evil and confine them to darkened, hidden corners of the world like monsters, then we are most definitely projecting something about ourselves.
That was one of the most thought provoking podcasts I’ve heard in a long time. Thanks for doing that. I want more; I want to hear from more people with challenging ideas.
1

2 replies

@LimitlessLiving5555
7 hours ago
Watch europa the last battle
3

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Lot to unload there.
All that will be answered in full with the documentary suggested by the fellow commenter above me.
ETLB

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
Why do you have such vicious tone with these young men?
8

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
That sneer was barely kept under the surface.

@iannicholson4437
3 days ago
Interesting interview. I think they’d have more success if they dropped the Hitler fandom, it’s just not palatable to many people. Best to focus on the immediate issues affecting today’s Australians. Good work, Sam! You gave them a fair go and your line of questioning was direct and respectful – to them and your audience. A fine line to walk in this instance!
5

@juts7973
2 days ago
Both Tom and Blair have since had their X accounts deleted.
6

@thinktrove24
2 days ago (edited)
These guys have far right views
that never get a voice in Australia as we cancel anything that falls outside of standard views
EXCEPT, somehow, the extreme woke left views
are forced down our throats and we’re told we’re the far right for NOT being trans fans, invasion fans, misandry fans and on it goes. It is the extreme left that are to thank for much of what is discussed in this interview. A true democracy will always self balance. Well done Sam for bringing balance to media. You clearly don’t support the views
and have done a great job handling an extremely difficult interview.
3

@AyyLmao88
3 days ago (edited)
There is a fundamental difference between thought and action. Speech is an expression of thought, it is completely different and incomparable to physical violence
3

@jonathanm836
3 days ago
Good on you for having these two lads on
4

@someguy516
2 days ago
Sam looks great for 80
7

@antoniostroea4044
2 days ago
Hail Australia o/
7

@trigeek38
3 days ago
Great interview and the guys present a solid defense of their arguments. The term Ordo Amoris has recently taken the spot light here in America. It is relevant to this discussion as well, in that it is their right, and the right of everyone regardless of color or creed, to order and prioritize their love of faith, family and folk above others. It is the natural law
4

@graphenemobil
3 days ago
Good interview
8

@fastfoeword
3 days ago
Good on you Sam for an honest conversation. Very respectable and frankly these two sound like their heads are screwed on just right. Bravo.
2

@watwur
3 days ago
Yeah, the Boys!
5

@hamish4659
2 days ago
Legends, very exciting to see these movements grow in Australia
4

@Willowtree82
1 day ago
As an American who came across this just have a look over here. You see how it’s so divided and how many illegals came in and what’s happening. Don’t become like us
2

@RCD4444
3 days ago
Never considered myself anything like a national socialst but i found myself agreeing with almost everything these guys had to say. I think it might be too late for this sort of thinking to ever win in australia now though. I dont want to discourage the fight for ” our team ” but it does feel like australia is lost.
7

1 reply

@JetsFan123-y4e
3 days ago
No black pilling
3

@mikewilkins4126
1 day ago
Whereas I disagree with you based on the discussion, it took a lot of courage to have them on.
4

@justinhatch1326
3 days ago
o/ Heil Tom and Blair
7

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Very leading questions. Great replies. These guys are direct and just what we need in this Country. People don’t know History and what is actually going on with the “Antiseptic” brain washing.
2

1 reply

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Older Aussies are sleeping rough. I see it everywhere. No foreigners sleeping rough or in caravans and tents. Older Aussies that worked.. paid taxes and fought for our likestyle. I can’t afford to buy a house.
We need to protect our white residents.
1

@jinfdb1026
3 days ago
Good stuff Sam, great vid
7

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sweden’s in trouble too
8

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sweden’s in trouble too
6

@kaarinfairfax6665
3 days ago
Great to hear an alternative narrative. Great chat for sure.
4

@BritishJuche
3 days ago
Always glad to hear from people with non-mainstream views

2

@faustgoethe7383
3 days ago
Incredibly based. Hail NSN!
5

@MrStealYaWifey
2 days ago
Great conversation! Surprised the video is still up, while the other two are banned from Twitter. Why did those two get banned? “Free Speech” is semantics.
3

@athulfgeirsson
3 days ago
WE COME FROM THE LAND DOWN UNDER
6

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
You better run
You better take cover
2

@syjrun
1 day ago
This is a shit interview maybe it’s good for boomers, but I think sam is out of his depths here and couldn’t. He lacks the philosophical depth to understand their views
and thus investigate them.
I understand they were capitalizing on sams platform.
There were so many good questions that went unasked.
4

@tommytaylor6436
2 days ago
Massive respect to Blair and Thomas
8

@MrCobblecraft
3 days ago
Free speech, you don’t have to agree with them but they also have a viewpoint well done sir.
2

@HermannCortez
3 days ago
Outstanding interview. I hate to say it but these two guys are right..
5

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
If they’re right, why would you hate to say it
2

@jtlegionnaire6310
2 days ago
22:59 I disagree for one exception, the only country founded not by true force was Israel, which was gifted to people who didn’t live there by a separate government (the British) and displaced the current inhabitants (Palestinians).
4

@TrimbakkiFonElsass
2 days ago
Great interview, a lot of common sense
3

@rodneytuxedo7559
2 days ago
I never thought I would see the day that this would leak into the mainstream.
1

@Nationalist1212
3 days ago
Blood and honour!
5

@gindphace
2 days ago
Blair is great
6

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Both Blair and Tom. I could listen to a few hours of these good men spitting facts.

@thomasthomas1359
4 hours ago
Awesome
1

@peekaytruth5951
3 days ago
About time you had someone who talks sense
5

1 reply

@AntipodeanRose
2 days ago
Peter Kusznir

@pattycrabby9749
25 minutes ago
Ill say this about the old codger; its bold of him to still have this up and i give him props for that. For how much longer though..

@n8errific
3 days ago
Follow all the laws or you’re “antisocial.”
Ok, so when it comes out that taking property from White Australians by force with no compensation is the new law you’ll just go along with it. God forbid you be antisocial and oppose that.
6

@ertanokyay9976
2 days ago

6

@truthseeker2222
3 days ago
Let’s go boys
5

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago (edited)
“Why are you so preoccupied with this?”
Dude. You serious?
1

@Justindickson1986
3 days ago
These guys are great
5

@jacksoncapper
3 days ago
Excellent interview; well done.
4

@drewftw2457
2 days ago
You fried this boomers brain.
6

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago
27:45 omfg you effing boomer. Completely useless, except when he’s being the useful idiot he is.
2

@followerofthetrain6336
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell is the greatest man of the 21st century
5

@andybarry3435
2 days ago
It’s not an overthrow more a reclamation.
3

@stigcc
3 days ago
I was here. History was made. Thank you o/
3

@justadudedudin
2 days ago
Great interview. Legends
2

@anniew4105
1 day ago
I want to commend the host for even allowing these guys on. I can tell hes not a super political guy but, whether he Knows it or not, he has taken a stand here. Kudos and maith an fear.
1

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Until he got pressured by the establishment, then bent the knee to the local rent-a-, who like always rubbed his hands together to make a few shekels off selling garbage t-shirts and promoting his channel. Sam had an opportunity to open the conversation, then immediately slammed the door shut on that at the first sign of pressure. What a coward.

@TheShortStrawMelbourne
1 day ago
For starters, ditch those specs Blair, looks odd. Love your honesty and vulnerability Lads. I agree with the alien political position.
And yes, Very suspicious caravan.
. agreed!
Protect White Australia!
2

@BrandonM
3 days ago
45:57 Best moment, can’t stop laughing. Legend.
5

@followerofthetrain6336
3 days ago
21:10 the chief has spoken. Italians are officially White
5

4 replies

@UltimateLarper
2 days ago
He still wants a Nordic ethnostate in AUS. Open nordicist
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Not really. Southern Europeans aren’t. Most of em.
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@UltimateLarper Based. Germanics are the chosen people. But I like all Europeans. Except southern italians and greeks who are not European.
1

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
This was a tongue in cheek comment. Notice the somewhat tan/brown fist. Yes, we have different flavors amongst our own. I don’t want any of our cousins to be replaced by a brown horde. I think most of the WN stock are Germanic/Anglo.
1

@link2893
3 days ago
Much respect to all 3 yous
3

@jarrid1220
2 days ago
This host has strange facial expressions
5

1 reply

@toneabet6252
2 days ago
He always has, it’s his brand. He’s a sports and TV star that was dropped by Australian media for expressing views
against woke culture over the years. Portrayed by the media as a bit of a has been. He’d be rich and would own multiple properties so would greatly benefit from mass immigration

@leneeslash3989
2 days ago
Your 2nd best episode has 1/4th the views
and 1/10th the likes. (So far). We are inevitable.
4

@AndrewSmithyyy
3 days ago
Thank you
5

@deana_
1 day ago
Learn to listen, Red Shirt. You’re a bad conversationalist.
4

@JamesBkk
3 days ago
Thanks for supporting free speech Sam
3

@epicwinguyz
3 days ago
based
6

@MidlifeRenaissanceMan
3 days ago
I my country too
6

@guenthersteiner3311
2 days ago
Well done Sam
6

@777hdt
1 day ago
Comes down to who we let in. Back in my day it was WOGS and they all became Aussies. The new imports don’t follow our ways. You come here you should follow the Aussie ways.
2

1 reply

@averageindoeuropean8103
3 days ago
W Blair
6

@christianskey4915
2 days ago
In all that you didn’t ask them if they believe in God or jesus but I honestly support a white Australia
4

@joeypaige
1 day ago
After watching this almost all the way through, I have to say that I don’t think the boys said anything really crazy, but the way it was obviously “heard” was pretty crazy.
2

@vbee3682
1 day ago
Interesting interview, thank you Sam
1

@Knightt322
12 hours ago
White bread is the best m8
2

@LisaClough-mr9fu
20 hours ago
Wow… that’s a bit much… they’ve exploited u but u have exposed them… I note they no longer have X profiles…
5

2 replies

@LisaClough-mr9fu
20 hours ago
Love ya Sammy! Time for that road trip!

@Timic83tc
14 hours ago
Australian government and elon are slime
3

@TheShortStrawMelbourne
1 day ago
Reach out to me Lads! I’ll gladly join again!
2

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
interesting guests, great idea sammy
2

@hockly1
3 days ago
Good stuff
4

@calebvinson8703
23 hours ago
We’re so back!!
5

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
this is gold lol
5

@anniew4105
1 day ago
This was pure comedy
1

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Seriously etf is this.. Newman laughing and loving this,
2

1 reply

@mcmelissa6062
2 days ago
Tis Great, huh !? xx
3

@superbuddyfranklin
1 day ago
Great to see the other side. Well done Sam.
5

@BrandonM
3 days ago
Man Newman and blair had quite a few back and forthes lol.
5

@menlikegods363
3 days ago
Bravo!
4

@godant2134
2 days ago
Very good interview
3

@theoloutlaw
2 days ago
Sam conducts a superb interview. I’d listen to him interview anyone all day long.
1

@OzzysRadioHalfHour
1 day ago
Hey Sam, Peekay wants an interview with you
3

@Freedomone153
3 days ago
China did ethnic cleansing. Greeks did ethic cleansing. Mingols… Starlin did ethnic cleansing. Been happening for 1000s of years
2

@gastroacid1971
3 days ago
You should join the group!
5

@d00dmchc
3 days ago
90% of this is just Sam yapping
5

@mikewagner2632
2 days ago
Thank you for the interview!
1

@wolfgangamadeuskeen
3 days ago
Good discussion.
3

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Wayne Carey is such a role model
3

@cuneytbrentvalle7556
3 days ago

5

@Peter-wm8ke
3 days ago
Well done, Sam.
3

@jesuslejesus9051
3 days ago
I respect Sam for doing the interview but my dear God did he drop several megaton BOOOOOMS.
2

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
*BOOOOMerisms
2

@Knightt322
13 hours ago
Hahaha this is hehe i love controversy
1

@trollsarebad1541
3 days ago
Just over 27 million in Australia not 25
4

2 replies

@thad1488
3 days ago
Cant even keep up with the numbers, since they’re flooding so many browns in
6

@trollsarebad1541
3 days ago (edited)
@thad1488 Yeah I have no doubt there is a few million more probably 30M is a safe estimate.
2

@kalteisen6185
2 days ago
Love the video. Keep it up fellas.
1

@toonstierney1170
3 days ago
We’re at a generic bottleneck and our folk will pass through
1

@AnarchistBogan
2 days ago
Mad respect for having the stones to have them on Sam
1

@James-mg7fd
2 days ago
Based never replaced
2

@mulgabill5006
17 hours ago
Interview was all over the place
2

@happycarnivore5481
13 hours ago
A failed soldier thinking he is more than that.
1

@Maza675
1 day ago
Worst interviewer ever
2

@dima_r6
2 days ago
Great lads. God bless them
3

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago (edited)
SAM HAS DONE NO WRONG
THE MEDIA ATTACK ON THIS GREAT MAN IS AWFUL
SAM WE LOVE YOU.
VERY INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS AND A GOOD INTERVIEW.
KUDOS
MUCH LOVE SAM.
CLEARLY OBVIOUSLY SAM DOES NOT DOES NOT IN ANYWAY AGREE OR ENCOURAGE THESE MEN.
SAM IS A GOOD MAN AND IT WAS A RIVETING INTERVIEW.
KUDOS SAMMY
2

@BasedPewDiePie
3 days ago
Big up Tom and Blair
88
3

@bradcavanagh3092
2 days ago
Now I like curry, but now that we’ve got the recipe, do they really need to stay?
5

1 reply

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
actually i dont like my insides exploding

@rarebee3743
17 hours ago
VICTORY VICTORY
2

@EmersonArtwork
2 days ago
O7 to Thomas and Blair … and this brave podcaster.
1

@celineferdinand6944
2 days ago
Great interview, for a Boomer. They seem like good, decent lads who love their people.
8

@HMKT1996
1 day ago
Absolutely kino.
2

@ReggieBlinker-k9e
3 days ago
Three top blokes as far as I’m concerned.
3

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
It’s not the people’s fault it’s govt not pushing Australian values
2

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago
Sam you have done no wrong.
I dont agree with these men, but you asked good questions.
Love ya sammy
Folks having a go at sam are idiots.
3

@DuerstMania
2 days ago
Yaw waythith!
5

@katieladanyi3584
4 hours ago
Im giving you a kicking Sam, for your misrepresentation of these men, in other posts videos! I don’t agree with everything they want. But i 100% don’t agree with the things you’ve said!
2

2 replies

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago (edited)
He had no choice.
It’s either bend the knee to the Levantine apostles, or loose everything, including friends and family.
Now that IS real Power!

@pattycrabby9749
24 minutes ago
@1neAdam12 he had a choice. The two men he’s throwing under the bus had the same choice and they chose honor and integrity.

@David_dickinson
2 days ago
Making it big move boys, impressive and behind it.
1

@NorthernLycanthrope
3 days ago (edited)
Well that was absolutely painful to listen to. Like being interviewed by a child who’s unable to grasp basic concepts and keeps getting hysterical and off topic. How this Sam guy became famous ill never know. Reminds me of that guy Jeremy Vine here. Can’t stand the bloke.
Perhaps get a brick wall do the next “interview”.
3

2 replies

@magicjohnson3121
3 days ago
He was a football player. That’s why he is famous.
1

@Mothy2014
3 days ago
Sam needs to listen to Joe Rogan. Get some lessons on how to conduct a podcast.
There is a reason Rogan is the number one podcaster in the world.
And there are many more great podcasters.
2

@stephanie795
3 days ago
I want the 80’s back.
10

4 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago
The 90s would be fine too
2

@HuWhiteDeath
3 days ago
Let’s create a better future instead of just looking back to the past
1

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@stephanie795 should of fought harder instead of eating garbage food and clapping at blacks kicking footballs
3

@stephanie795
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 I don’t eat garbage food and don’t follow footy. Big fail.
1

@chris63952
1 day ago
Sam is too combative
1

@AK4.7.47Cossack
3 days ago

4

@Pugna-cz6gs
3 days ago
o/
6

@Bill87762
2 days ago
Dude almost seems to get it- the cognitive dissonance is real with boomers and gen X
2

2 replies

@nikanton819
2 days ago
Not so much with Gen X. The boomers can never let go of their counter culture hippy movement.
2

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Gen X knows. Boomers are a lost cause.
1

@BorisBugger
2 days ago
You have a home, it is called Britain, and it now needs its most courageous sons.

@FirstNameLastName-o1d
3 days ago
I’d vote for these guys…..
2

@thesystemsucks
3 days ago
jeez sam, showing your age there mate. good interview though. hail victory.
4

1 reply

@X988F
3 days ago
boomers will be boomers. However, this has probably woken sam a little, I’ve been watching the lads for years now, the Adelaide stunt was the best optics they could’ve gotten.
4

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Well as long as Tom and Blair can get along with white people.. same values. Oh god bless Deakin.. and white Daddies..They admit they have read one book
1

@IAmBeanz1
1 day ago
Great stuff guys!

@BillyJoeVal
3 days ago
o/
6

@Dead-bl7to
3 days ago
Thomas is extremely articulate here. He needs to have his own show without Joel rambling.
6

@Ilych367
7 hours ago
first time i’ve ever bothered listening to these guys, i wrote these guys off as just being racist pricks out to cause issues, but after listening to them in this interview i have to admit that they do make a number of salient points.
some of their rhetoric is a bit offputting but they do seem to make a lot of points that i think us aussies who are sick of all the woke nonsense going on would have to agree with.
it seems everything this country does puts refugees, immigrants and ‘oppressed minorities’ ahead of regular everyday working aussies.
i dont know if these guys really hate other races or they’re just taking a pro white stance after this, but i guess that’s enough to be called an evil racist these days anyway.
my first thoughts on these guys might have been based off what i saw in the headlines. silly of me i guess after all the lies during covid to trust the news.
do these guys do their own show to listen to so i can decide for myself instead of what channel 9 said?
1

1 reply

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Yes, they both post content on the social media platforms that will have them. I would list them for you, but the ADL censorship algorithms will delete it. Sorry.

@SerenityNow22
2 days ago
If people want more solid content about these topics from a Christian perspective; check out The Stone Choir podcast. You can thank me later.
1

@HeadWest1620
2 days ago
Common sense
3

@Palendrome
2 days ago
Blair sometimes cuts into what Thomas is saying when Thomas is making a really good point. He needs to watch that
1

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
17 hours ago
What’s with Elon musk doing so called solute and saying Germans should be proud of themselves?????
Anyway to do with Australia we are getting to many ppl come here with not enough housing etc etc etc
1

@jeremylukedominicbate7482
2 days ago
Get yourself de-indoctrinated Sam.
3

@johnnyj-t2e
3 days ago
sam is like an australian biden ffs.
3

1 reply

@neilr4867
3 days ago
He’s the same age and far more with it than Biden
1

@Norrbottning
3 days ago
Newman
4

@dale8535
3 days ago
Warm up the engines…
3

@substancep21
2 days ago

3

@Furiker
3 days ago
This is going to get you in so much trouble holy moly.
1

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
YiddIe me this:
How do you take 6 from 15, to end up with 15?
A. You use a “﬩” sign
1

@ABACUSMBS
22 hours ago
o/
3

@australian6983
2 days ago
God bless you Sam, you’re a good man and patriot. I like many other Australians am sick of the woke mob and terrible rhetoric and ideology like Multiculturals, feminism and others. I thank you for remaining firm and true!

@DaviDamir
1 day ago
how did convicts build all of the buildings with stone
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
How are uninformed people (regardless if age) so sure they are right, without corroborating evidence…truly boggles the mind…Boomer headline readers
1

@farright118
3 days ago
0:30 stop getting caught on hitler. Not to say there isnt things we shouldnt look to in nazi germany. I.e like you said national revivial
Just that we should focus on australia and supporting other white coungries
1

@Nats0x
7 hours ago
45:47

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago
This is like street talk for Sam.
HAHAHAHAH
Love ya sam
You’re a legend Sam.
YOU HAVE DONE NO WRONG!
PPL LOVE UR WORK.

@tompchromedome
2 days ago (edited)
The 1960s were better.
This interviewer needs to let his guests speak rather than using his time going oooh haaaaa hummmmm to say nothing and block the guest info. poor interviewing style.
post ww2 Australians were never asked and never voted on this mass immigration and still to day why not like the Abo vote , have a vote on immigration and the ideas spoken about here.
2

1 reply

@thepaedophileprofit3062
1 day ago
They have never permitted it to be an election issue because if they did the voters would have revoked the ‘mandate’ for the uni-party to enact the ‘multi-cultural’ future they wished to impose. All western nations have had the same fate thrust upon them, none of them, not one of those regimes ever had a mandate to do so stemming from the population having voted for it. Both Libs and Labor have always agreed between themselves to both take the same course and to never have immigration as an election issue to be debated, elections are only fought on issues that boil down to where and for what the money stolen by government should be spent, elections are never fought over issues which the ruling classes are determined to enact, as they know that the population would reject their agenda if ever given a say on it.
1

@henrysunday
1 day ago
When a black woman speaks, i listen
4

@ThisIsJamesL
6 minutes ago
#FreeSamMelia

@limorweingarten9378
3 days ago
I have so many questions to ask them.
1. What happens to white people who march with the so-called Pro-palestine or the good white people who support the Jewish community from antisemitism?
2. What happens to all the children born from mixed marriages, e.g. Chinese and a white person?

@jjohnson6471
1 day ago
I respect Sam for having them on the podcast but he’s obviously in mental decline

@kelvinbaldwin2117
3 days ago
Well done Sam
1

@mitchellkoch7122
3 days ago
Well done Sammy you legend
1

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago (edited)
Tom. You are Hebrew. YES. Aboriginals were not Here first. They are a mix of India and North African. And we’re chased here.And they Genocided The Great Pygmy Nation Of the Great South Land
2

@DaviDamir
1 day ago
REV 2:9
3

@scottbingham4097
2 days ago
46:02
1

@Bigred-ie1nk
1 day ago
Im more Sam level racist than these guys
1

@WikingNordlan
3 hours ago
46:05 Did he say what I think he said?

@trexx32
1 day ago
He said nothing wrong
1

@talk2thoran
3 days ago
“white supremacists”? When was that term ever used or able to be imputed?
1

@nearlythere1957
2 days ago
what happened at cathederal mountain and the grampians .

@MrX-wd8cm
3 days ago
Is that the Austrian Painter or Charlie Chaplin ? LoL
1

@piscator57
3 days ago
The constant tapping on the desk is aggravating AF…..
1

@farright118
3 days ago
0:20 sam jumped in a bit hot
1

@michaelirish1445
3 days ago
MINUTE 46 WHAT A GOTCHA MOMENT!face-purple-cryingface-green-smilingface-orange-biting-nailsface-fuchsia-tongue-outface-orange-raised-eyebrowtrophy-yellow-smiling

@giggygiggy1393
2 days ago
Woah………………strap in Folks………….

@kimberlyannhoustonchezann7087
2 days ago
NSN w
2

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
32:40
2

@timmcgrath9708
3 hours ago
Sam. Stop interrupting.

@24tommy109
2 days ago
46:06
1

@pecc2081
3 days ago
22.08 what is he looking at
1

@philbromleysphotography8414
3 days ago
God Sam why do you bother doing these interviews you’re too old, they walked all over the top of you. And you wonder why they keep talking over the top of because you sit there and mumble all the time you can’t put two words together. You’re too old to try to battle with people of that age..
1

2 replies

@HP66856
3 days ago
What a ridiculous comment. Based on the support in the comments, he’s getting a standing ovation for being brave enough to interview them, when the media & govt have slandered them and blocked anything they said. I say well done, Sam, for being one of the very few in this country for showing any courage at all on this topic.
2

@philbromleysphotography8414
2 days ago

@HP66856 it’s not about the content or the guest that come on regardless who they are. Sam can’t interview he mumbles all the time and loses his chain of thought over and over. He gets frustrated when they talk over him because his mumbling he can’t get two words out. He needs to hang up the boots or get behind the camera and let Sue take over.
1

@dime5984
3 minutes ago
YOU ARE AMALEK

@davidweisinger834
3 days ago
Good on you Sam for having them on. Sunlight is the best cure for the good, the bad and the ugly. Some points are good and well reasoned. Other points were simply extreme and should be mocked. The constant interruption was rude and irritating but otherwise an interesting perspective.
1

@tengenuzui8425
2 days ago
\o

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
What’s the border line of who is white? Is it some arbitrary standard based on appearance, language, culture, history, geography? Or a mix of all of these? We know who is human for example, and this is fact. But seems to me the the standard of whiteness is just up to an individuals arbitrary opinion.
3

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Thomas Sowell agrees with them.

1 reply

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago
Eh not really

@Vloke6
2 days ago
Wrong demographic numbers. As of 2021 there were ~25m Australians and ~18-19 of those were White.

@mullythebully5557
2 days ago
o/
2

@WildRandysWorld
9 hours ago
King Boomer

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
The interviewer was fair and laudable. Blair was great and displayed better social skills here than Tom. Tom needs to relax and listen more and stop trying to out-talk and over-talk people in a conversation.
3

1 reply

@HP66856
3 days ago
He is given very few opportunities to speak, and when he does the government and media in this country misquote and slander him. I think he did a brilliant job, and would happily tune in to hear these two be interviewed again.
3

@BinaryBunyip
1 day ago (edited)
Wasn’t there some theory that everyone on Earth could live in an area the size of Texas, and be cozy? Either way, I believe that there’s enough land out there for everyone. No country needs to take over anywhere. Just need to fix their own nation as well. Hopefully we can see this thing happen. Less corruption, so people do not have to abandon their homes in the 1st place. Think about it. Deep down, people are ‘separatists’. Or do we have a separate section, for all cultures in every country?
Diversity, is not what many people think it is. It’s ‘diverting’. Splitting. Not to say, we can’t all get along… Sure we can.

@farright118
3 days ago
21:00 ive always looked at australia through a racial lens not an ethno lens hoever i get the argument

@BigT-Tv82
3 days ago
Sam Newman for prime Minister?…

1 reply

@travv88
3 days ago
Tom, Blair and Joel.
2

@WestCoastR1der
11 hours ago (edited)
Worst interviewer ever, unwatchable
2

@queenie8896
2 days ago
Unbelievable

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
It wasn’t 6.000.000 . It was over 60.000.000
1

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Boomer
1

@Billy_BrownCow
2 days ago
Which government agency runs the roman circus, without free bread?
1

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
The miserly priesthood

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Tom, it’s “homogeneous.” Not “homogenous.”
1

14 replies

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Homogenous, homogeneous, homologous, etc all practically mean the same thing.
5

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ I know that people will understand what he means, and the words are often used interchangeably now after years of people mistakenly saying “homogenous” when they meant “homogeneous” to the point where the bastardisation has become accepted. But one is correct for what he means to say and one isn’t. And he might as well just say it correctly.
1

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@TheIsaac41 the improper word choice here isn’t a grammar issue. It’s using the wrong word.

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 it’s called having standards. Perhaps you can’t relate. And since Tom uses the word often when talking about the kind of society he prefers, then he might as well use the right word. Frankly, correcting him here ought to be welcomed, as it can help him. A lot of people make the same mistake. It’s not just him.
1

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1
Sperg more. People like you end up as cannon fodder for browns
3

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ And you’re mad because I corrected someone’s improper word use. I don’t even feel the need to respond in kind nor attempt to insult you. I’m just glad that everyone reading will now know to say “homogeneous” and NOT “homogenous” from now on. You’re welcome.

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago

@ you’re kinda proving my point, caught up in irrelevant details.
2

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1 maybe actually engage with the argument silly billy

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1 and outside of linguistics discipline the use of the word grammar seems to be acceptable in this context. So what’s your issue with Tom and Blair exactly?
2

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@TheIsaac41 regarding “homogeneous,” why not just thank me for pointing out the error and move on? And as to my opinion of Tom and Blair as communicators, I think Blair is far superior. And I don’t think nationaIist activism needs to be centered around WW2 or hitIer or a certain ethnoreligious group. Tom is too self-indulgent and talks AT people in conversations like this. He seems more interested in rehabilitating hitIer’s reputation than appealing to, and advocating for, White people. He doesn’t have an easy manner about him like Blair does. Nationalism doesn’t need to be a hitIer worship cult. And back to the subject of word use: someone should inform Tom that Australians don’t use the word “volk.” Like I said, he’s self-indulgent, and he’s not really listening to the people he’s supposed to be appealing to. Tom needs to learn to chill out and give other’s the floor and acknowledge their concerns and perspectives. It seems like he just loves to hear himself talk. Anyway, Blair seems to have none of those problems, and I think this interview would have been a lot more successful if it had just been Blair being interviewed alone.
1

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
@Student____2025__1 but you haven’t corrected “someone’s” grammar, youve just commented on a YouTube video
1

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago

@ Jesus dude chill out all over a word you’ve gotta be taking the piss

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago
@Student____2025__1 and I’m pretty sure Tom’s just pronouncing “folk” in a residual NZ accent. What are you on about dude. Tbh I thought Blair needed to chill a bit and give Sam a bit of slack n ease him into it. He was a guest after all

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago (edited)
@Student____2025__1 what you prefer some sort of vague airy fairy civic nationalism? You’re very boring

@dfveiga9
2 days ago
Rhodesia, South Africa, Australia, NZ… These countries unfortunately got it all wrong. I get it, white europeans (anglos for the most) were the ones who built up theses places – the people before them barely left a footprint – but it’s still “their place” of origin. Claiming it today would actually against non-whites claiming their right to be in Europe, the place of origin of the whites. Which is their original “Lebensraum”.
The whites wanting to live outside of Europe should be the ones wanting to mingle with the local population.
1

@RaoulLawson
3 days ago
Onya sam

@gordopark13
2 days ago
I’m 7th Gen Australian, 20 year Veteran and I’m of Polynesian Trinidadian decent. So I’m not a real Australian because I’m not white? Lol
1

5 replies

@jamesbrittain5659
2 days ago
Are you an Anglo-Celt?
If not then stop your whinging.
9

@gordopark13
2 days ago
@jamesbrittain5659 you can have a say if you actually fought for your country if not take a backseat champ!
1

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Trinidad?
That’s blatantly not Australian
Or European
6

@layersoftruth8115
2 days ago
You said it yourself your “Polynesian Trinidadian”.
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
Who do you think you’re fooling, doubt your grandparents were born in Australia.Look up the meaning of nation…we are not from the same group of peoples, I’m Anglo-Saxon not matter what country I’m born in. I care about those that are closest genetically to me. i.e I care more about my kids then my cousins kids, i care more about my cousins kids then my 2nd cousins kids ect If you’re not European my concern for your people is not our issue. If anyone can become Australian then it means nothing.
2

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Tom is exhausting. I wish this were just a talk between Blair and the host. Blair was making great points. And we don’t need to make pro-whlte politics a hitIer fest. Nationalism doesn’t revolve around WW2 history.
7

7 replies

@PhilipCunningham1788
3 days ago
WW2 is the reason we are at this point
14

@matt79hz
3 days ago
Tom didn’t steer that conversation, he would have preferred to keep it in the now but if asked something he’ll answer honestly.
8

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ Tom likens modern day Australia to Weimar Republic, which was prior to the war. Regardless, I think Tom ought to listen to all the people telling him they are pro-whlte but not really interested in basing their Australian nationaIist activism around fanboying for historical leaders from another country. If that is the only way Tom can think of to promote much-needed nationalism, then he lacks imagination and sense. Tom is too self-indulgent. He seems like a very sincere guy, and I wish him well, but I think we can do better when it comes to nationaIist activism and communication.
4

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago (edited)
@matt79hz I noticed it was Blair who tried to shift the focus of the conversation. Tom seemed happy and eager to hold forth at length any chance he got about his worship of hitIer. I just don’t think we should turn nationaIist efforts into a hitIer worship cult. Yes, the never-ending guilt trip propaganda about the war is ridiculous, but the answer isn’t to try to always center our efforts around WW2 events.
3

@neilr4867
3 days ago
Blair has been through the ringer in life. It shows. He’s calm and measured, and obviously well read. When he speaks, you listen.
5

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Absolutely. Blair is better at conversation and relating to the other person in an easy manner. Tom often just talks at the other person and expresses little interest in understanding the other person’s concerns.
1

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Tom got his back up because the very first question by Sam was designed to do that. Hence Tom then was on the defensive for the rest of the show
1

@TheMonochord
2 days ago
I tune into Blair and Sewell to study there political perspective even though I assume they would consider me a traitor given my partner is not white… but that being said …I can understand their concerns for the incremental erosion of the white race from the planet and their desire to preserve it.If they want to retain their ‘purity’ and just be left alone, so be it. I just wish their affiliate’s would show more class and not use cheap pejoaitives like the ‘N word’ ect in their discourse . There is no dignity in it.
2

1 reply

@OVERLORDTB0NE
2 days ago
I feel almost the exact same way as you. I’m fascinated by them, some of the things they have said has hit me like a truck, we feel forgotten as a people. I think I would be also be considered a traitor for the same reason

@Basedbae
2 days ago
What is the go with the categorisation of your podcasts? It’s ridiculous and make no logical sense

@kalxtube
1 day ago
Id be interested to know their thoughts on an Australian kid with obvious asian background who wear the auscam unifprm on our ships and fly our F18’s.
1

2 replies

@lannybuddrick2909
1 day ago
It is not the rare exception that is important, but the norms, because there are millions of people who are migrating that are fundamentally different.

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Fly for China.

@joshicortez1537
1 day ago
You helped their recruitment with this podcast. Not my place to say if that’s good or bad but the fact is you have helped them and their cause more than you have hurt it. All publicity is good publicity & these Nazis are getting plenty of it .
1

2 replies

@elainesabatino7467
15 hours ago
Cry Harder, SoyJack!

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Good.
1

@Knightt322
13 hours ago
Elon musk is a hero
1

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
17 minutes ago
Really?
The day after this interview blair and Tom were suspended from X
The day after that, the rest of their group’s spokesmen were suspended from X
Our leaders gave Elon a list of names to ban and he did it
“Hero”

@davidanthony7495
2 days ago
Terrible Interview!!!
Thomas shot himself in the foot!
Know when to shut up Thomas! :)))

2 replies

@FLmetalhead
2 days ago
How did Thomas shoot himself in the foot?
2

@jurrianfeitsma9566
2 days ago
All I saw was a boomer mind shorting out over speech that makes perfect sense
2

@gary1705
3 days ago
Sam you should have invited Pauline Hanson to join you
2

@macleayexplorer
3 days ago
The National Socialist leader is from a South African background. Maybe he is angry at what happened in his country, but I dont think his ideas are relevant to Australia.
His “authority or arrogance” is very Dutch ( white South African).
Thank you for bringing this podcast to us.

3 replies

@macleayexplorer
3 days ago

@ – Im not referring to Musk.

@KyleShreds6391
3 days ago
Tom Sewell isn’t a south African. His family were native Brits and he was born in NZ. He did have family in Rhodesia though. Either way, you’re wrong. Not wanting all white nations to turn into a global south africa is not a bad thing. It’s basic self preservation.
6

@AJWRAJWR
3 days ago
We just had a referendum over whether to hand our country over to the blacks like the South Africans had to. And you’re assuming he’s Dutch, but obviously white South Africans can be Anglos too.
3

@coreyworthingtonii9230
2 days ago
Blair has always come across as a numpty, but Thomas makes very good points. Even if you disagree with him, he makes some valid points.
2

2 replies

@audhumbla6927
2 days ago
Please quote one single thing Blair said here that wasnt sensible and true and right?
5

@oppje6188
2 days ago
Blair has charisma imo easier for the average guy/boomer to understand
3

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
They are not smile lines.. they are stretch marks.

@AnthonyTreeve-xo6ih
3 days ago
Blair stated that last year 1.1M migrants entered Australia, of which most were Indian or Chinese. INCORRECT. Last year, net migration reduced by over 10% (down from 500k to around 445K)
Indians accounted for 72K, Chinese 50K and combined UK/NZ was 45K. Of the 445K total net migration, 90% are on TEMPORARY visas. It’s a different kettle of fish when you lay the FACTS on the table!
1

3 replies

@ddddddddddddddddrop3961
3 days ago
In the 2023-24 financial year, a total of 1.1 million new migrants entered Australia, which is the highest in recorded history, and is the second year in a row where more than one million migrants have entered the country.
8

@wolloms
3 days ago
So around 500k scammed the system legally. And 500k entered illegally. It needs to end.
6

@ddddddddddddddddrop3961
3 days ago
@wolloms Anthony’s data was is NOM, but Blair was using total.

@Mat8aios26
1 day ago
Sam great interview, the only thing I agree with Tom and Blair is nationalism (every person from their own country should love their country) apart from that they are completely wrong. I do not believe in a “White Australian” as I had experienced racism which wasn’t nice and hard , everyone should be welcome here in Australia regardless of race, religion or sex! Assimilation (if I move to Japan, I would respect their laws, learn their language and learn their way of life but I would never try to implement what I believe or want! ) is key because Australia let us keep our language, religion and culture. I was born here, my parents migrated from Greece to Australia which is the best country. People need to migrate here from all countries so long as it’s through the legal process. As I said, great interview Sam but these 2 guys are bat chit crazy! All people should live in harmony together!
1

@wabisabi3619
1 day ago
Mass immigration, not immigration, is an issue in australia and the west.
But larking as nazis and holding these disgusting beliefs doesn’t help us solve that. If anything it makes it worse.
So once again being in the sensible centre is made difficult by idiotic extremists.
1

4 replies

@pinball1974
1 day ago
The sensible centre – stand for nothing, fall for anything.
6

@Researchthejoos
1 day ago
Tell me how upset you are and how much you are trying to cope ?
4

@frankly88
1 day ago
Cool Story NoN yt you are still getting deported
3

@HP66856
1 hour ago
What disgusting beliefs? These two young men are well read, educated, and historically accurate in their statements.

@petesmitt
2 days ago
This interview really brought the jw haters out of the basements..

7 replies

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Lmfao. Where? I haven’t seen any comments whining about Jews. You’re the one bringing them into it.
10

@NelsonMandela961
2 days ago
Better than crawling up out of a NYC drain.
3

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
If wanting to survive as a given people equates to “jw hating”, it must als equate to human loving. So, therefore, the only question is: Is “hating” and being around to do so, better than not being around any longer?
1

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
@struthmedia8315 It’s likely a JIDF brigade member dropping by — just ignore them.
5

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@petesmitt What “truths” are afraid of scrutiny? Why would you make it a federal “crime” for simply questioning the accuracy of an “official event”?
1

@petesmitt
2 days ago
@azza_88-jl1rp Not at all; I’m all about free speech, including the freedom to criticise stupidity..

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@petesmitt okay what about the other things I mentioned?
1

@queenie8896
2 days ago
This is no longer 1920!!!!

6 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
That’s true. It’s 10000 worse. Europe has never experienced anything like what it is now, not USA either. Unprecedented “migration”.
2

@AJWRAJWR
2 days ago
Have you researched the Weimar Republic. This is exactly like 1920’s Germany.
3

@queenie8896
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden being anti immigration is one thing but how is it possible to deport half of the Australian population just because they aren’t white and placing the indigenous people somewhere else and reinstate segregation again. Do you really think this will happen again?

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@queenie8896 How is it not possible? How did they get there? Same way they got there to live off the sweat and struggles of anglos. The indigenous population can get a piece of land and have their own nation imo.
1

@queenie8896
2 days ago

@ hahahaha righto

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Right. So it’s possible to people to go somewhere, but not go back? It’s like an immoable law How convinient.
And if you don’t think there is a difference – live like you preach, move to Haiti and Liberia. See how you like it.
2

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
Tom. You are Hebrew.
1

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
they forgot u have to do roids and have under 120 iq to join nsn
1

3 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Oh the absolute irony of this comment, considering the IQ of an average Australian is 99 (and 65 for aboriginals, based on global statistics). So yes – I’d assume anyone associated with National Socialists do indeed have an IQ well above the country’s average, because they can assess exactly what is happening in this country and they can see the solutions to fix it. Well done, Tom and Blair – you have done your folk proud
8

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
@HP66856 That, and anyone who cites the “I. Q.” meme, instantly disqualifies themselves from the discourse. For it’s a grade school level, Dunning-Kruger give-away of one not having any argument, and only engaging in order to derail.
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@shoahkahn2692 People may cope about IQ tests…but it measures something that is consistent the world over, so whatever it measures some groups consistently under perform compared to other groups.
1

@glenferrieroadhawthorn
3 days ago
35:00 “I have infintely more in common with canadians, than I do with Chinamen” despite starting a business for years called Compass One with Dun Chu and Obie Chan as per the Daily Telepgraph
3

@hotkeyafl
1 day ago
These guys are dorks no matter what their belief system.

1 reply

@elainesabatino7467
15 hours ago
Cry Harder, SoyJack!

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
Tom. You Are totally Wrong about Germany
2

@pgstudio4651
1 day ago
If you guys changed and focused on just a Christian country, then I would be on board… How ever Christians come from every Continent including Africa, Asia and the Middle East. If Australia did this.. we would be the envy of the world.
1

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Sam… vvvvv vile lol

@charliec8013
2 days ago
Is this whole comment section populated with their group? It looks like a paid review page. Many people haven’t a clue who these people are, had no time to research, so its a tad weird.

4 replies

@someguy516
2 days ago
I’m black, I know exactly who they are and who you think they are, they are are correct.
5

@imperialhonorguard1483
2 days ago (edited)
I’m an American from Oregon
2

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
“Most of the comments here are supporting nationalists that love their people and nation, CAN ONLY BE ASTRO TURFED”
Cry more. Perhaps it’s YOU who doesn’t know who Sam Newman is,absolutely bloody huge name in Australian culture, it’s absolutely realistic that him sitting down with these 2 would go viral, and appeal to the majority of people thathave NO REPRESENTATION in parliament
6

@carltheflpatriot69
7 hours ago
@charliec8013 I’m an American in Florida and these guys are just speaking the truth that the majority of people are scared to talk about.

@samgribbles
3 days ago
The fact that people are supporting these two is truly disturbing. What they present as ‘facts’ is nothing more than a twisted misinterpretation of conspiracy theories, exaggerated to the point of absurdity. At best, it’s ignorance amplified by blind faith; at worst, it’s calculated manipulation fueled by hate.
If you support these views
, you should take a hard look at what you’re defending. Educate yourself (if you’re capable of it) on the nonsense they spew, and try to see through their vile rhetoric. While you’re at it, look up the Dunning-Kruger effect—it might help explain why they, and those who follow them, are so convinced of their own delusions.
1

3 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Calm down, Dvir.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Name calling will get you nowhere samgribbles, if you have better arguments, then use them. You’re not gonna convince me that they are not right with jjust calling people names, that will never work. Speaking about dunning-kruuger. I got a bachelor’s degree with perfect grades. I base my opinion on history, lived experience and logic.
1

@noglobo
2 days ago
And now, back to the programming for you
2

@anthonycullen1961
3 days ago
Not sure worthy of a platform but I’m a free speech absolutist so fair enough doing it but there’s not a lot of rigorous thought going on here.

2 replies

@thad1488
3 days ago
More than worthy
7

@HP66856
3 days ago
I’ll agree to disagree. I found this interview refreshing – most are too cowardly to dare have these two guests on, for risk of the traitorous government and media in this country coming down on them like a tonne of bricks.
1

@GregGreenery
1 day ago
The guy wouldn’t let Sam talk. Came off like a real grasshole

@clunie1959
3 days ago
I’m a white Aussie male and prefer Asian female companionship
2

5 replies

@frankly88
3 days ago
You can enjoy them in some asian country then
19

@BillyBurnsfield
3 days ago
You can go live there then mate
11

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
Gross.
Imagine making little mongrel Asians..
5

@clunie1959
1 day ago
@frankly88 I alternate between Thailand and Australia, I’m living the life.
1

@clunie1959
1 day ago
@BillyBurnsfield a bit hot for me, thank you for your advice.

@cccccc1
2 days ago
Thomas should have come on by himself.

1 reply

@Drummondsqorld
3 days ago
I wanted to like these guys , but listening to them, whack jobs. I get what they are saying but their delivery is horrible
2

4 replies

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago (edited)
Ohhh Blair found Mein Kamf in Polyester… the.best independent book shop that got raided for selling banned books and videos…but avoided all of the other brilliant books. Way to out yourself as a terrorist

1 reply

@fishsteak3246
3 days ago
Lmao he could have read many other books from there but why would he even bring those up when it wasn’t relevant to the topic at all?
How is he a terrorist, he hasn’t done any terrorism and advocates against it himself in the video
2

@jackmag4056
2 days ago
Thomas doesn’t even look white , Turk or Greek

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Why?
Because he has a tan?

@bruceanderson5618
2 days ago
Sam, your wrong giving these oxygen. Pathetic
2

2 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Why? They speak common sense, speak intelligently, and say a lot of things out loud that the sane majority of us are thinking.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
You’re afraid of opinions, that says something about you. If you have better arguments, sir, use them.
4

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
This is BS

8 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
That’s not an argument.
6

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
Yes it is there was a holocaust

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ No, saying something is BS without explaining what is, is not an argument.
I can’t legally say that there wasn’t, that says something about it
5

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
Oh go away your BS

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@marleneverity1253 Sir. Im Swedish and it’s “you’re”, not your. Do you not know your own language?
Not very educated are ya?
5

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Figured as much with such ignorant opinions.
4

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden it’s woman squawk, no making sense of it.
1

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
We are all Australian regardless of colour
1

6 replies

@PhilipCunningham1788
2 days ago
The first 16 prime ministers of Australia wouldn’t agree with you
15

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Move to Haiti or Liberia, if that’s what you really think.
8

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
I am entitled to my opinion

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
A dog born in a stable doesn’t make it a horse.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Sure, but if you don’t think there is a diffference – move to Haiti and Libera. Or maybe Somalia, or why not India?

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
So that means everyone in the world is an Australian they just haven’t moved here yet
The whole world is Australia!
R e e e e t a r d
4

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Show us on the doll where you were hurt lil babies.. please go to the drains line

1 reply

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
@jesslyons4470

2

@stanadeney5271
3 days ago
Thomas, you can go back to South Africa and Blair migrants built this country think about it Sam I don’t know what I think about the way you conducted this interview
1

6 replies

@Itsmeetc
3 days ago
You are brown
45

@StreetsDisciple01
3 days ago
They don’t disagree that the European migrants helped build the country.
16

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Brouwn man detected
19

3 days ago
Europeans and Anglos built this country its our heritage and birthright
30

@Maza675
3 days ago
Pioneers and settlers built the place. The struggles they faced is not even comparable to immigrants coming here now that it is established. Without pioneers and settlers it would not be the first world nation that it is.
16

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Lies
2

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 10,778

Total words in post = 38,462
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5: Wed, Feb 12, 2025 — Added more images and links. Minor typo corrections.

Version 4: Tue, Feb 11, 2025 — Added more images and links.

Version 3: Mon, Feb 10, 2025 — Added more images and links.

Version 2: Sun, Feb 9, 2025 — Add footnotes re the Einsatzgruppen. Added more images and links.

Version 1: Sat, Feb 8, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 53/53 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes YouTube comments (1,823).

Mark Collett – Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024 – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

admin — Sun, 03 Nov 2024 08:59:44 +0000

Mark Collett

Facing the Storm

PA Conference Speech 2024

Sat, Oct 19, 2024

[In this video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, gives an impassioned speech at PA’s annual conference about the challenges and dangers ahead for nationalists in a regime that is increasingly open about its White replacement agenda.

The following points were made by Mark:

Opening remarks thanking attendees.

Analogy of boiling a frog to describe gradual societal changes.
“Since 1945, there have been sweeping changes to almost every aspect of British life.”

Recent rapid changes under new Labour government.
“The heat has been turned up so quickly that nearly everyone is talking about it now.”

Public perception shift on immigration issues (8:00)
“There was once a time when you could speak to members of the public and they didn’t believe mass immigration was even an issue.”

Recent events highlighting immigration concerns (10:00)
“Who would have thought back in June that less than four months later we would have seen the murder of three little White girls by the son of migrants?”

New government policies and crackdowns (12:00)
“New legislation is now being drafted to criminalize those who speak out against migration.”

Two-tier system disadvantaging white British citizens (15:00)
“Normal White working folk are now clearly second class citizens.”

Mainstream acknowledgment of two-tier policing (18:00)
“The term has been used in Parliament, in the media and in almost every major newspaper.”

Opportunities and dangers of current situation (20:00)
“This is a watershed moment for nationalists here in the UK and it represents not some small or incremental shift, but a massive jump.”

Government’s acceleration of immigration (23:00)
“The establishment have clearly acknowledged that there is a race going on between migration and the public consciousness of migration.”

Recent population statistics (26:00)
“For the first time since 1976, deaths outstripped births here in the UK.”

Government’s efforts to silence dissent (28:00)
“Their second course of action is to effectively terrorize white people”

Origins of the term “terrorism” (30:00)
“The words terrorism and terrorist came into existence thanks to a gruesome and protracted period of state sponsored violence during the French revolution.”

Current state surveillance and oppression (33:00)
“We are moving toward a point where holding the wrong opinions will be seen as almost a capital crime”

Changing attitudes towards remigration (35:00)
“Remigration is now rightly seen as the only solution that can save us from becoming a minority.”

Potential criminalization of remigration rhetoric (37:00)
“Calls for remigration and deportation could well be outlawed as terms that are likely to stir up racial hatred.”

Plans for indigenous rights advocacy (39:00)
“We will become an indigenous rights advocacy and pressure group.”

Expectation of some supporters leaving the movement (41:00)
“I expect that some people who were once very active in this movement will take their leave.”

Speaker’s commitment despite risks (42:00)
“I will carry on despite the associated risks, because I believe more than anything that what we do is right.”

Closing rallying cry
“Those who dare to fight in the darkest of times are the heroes that will ensure that tomorrow belongs to us.”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/PA-Conference-Speech-2024:2?src=embed

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aWGeQ4dQjuCr

https://gab.com/MarkCollett

https://t.me/s/markacollett

Published on Sat, Oct 19, 2024

Description

Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024
November 1, 2024
1,344 views
161
Support
Save
3 Reposts
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
15K followers
Join
Following
My speech from the 2024 Patriotic Alternative Conference.
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrs
JUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
FREE eBook download:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/downloads/TheFallofWesternMan.pdf
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
File size
1.62 GB
Less
2.47
19 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 4,629 – Duration: 45 mins)

Aaron Spreadbury: All right, so our final speaker today needs no introduction, but he’s going to get one anyway! He has been in nationalism for over 20 years, and there isn’t much that he hasn’t seen. He is the founder and the leader of the largest nationalist organisation in the United Kingdom, and he has led Patriotic Alternative with both wisdom and courage. And without his efforts, none of us would be here today.

So please put your hands together and give a hearty round of applause for the one and only Mark Collett!

[loud applause]

Mark Collett: Firstly, before I start speaking, I just want to say a huge thank you to everyone who came here today. To see us packing out a room like this for what, the fifth year in a row is incredible! The momentum we’ve built and the momentum we’ve maintained over the last five years, people often credit to me. But it’s not really me who did this, it’s us!

So when people are giving myself a round of applause, I do appreciate that. But the round of applause should be extended to everyone who is part of our community, because first and foremost, that is what Patriotic Alternative is all about.

Now, there is an overused analogy that I am sure everyone in this room will be familiar with. And that analogy is about boiling a frog.

But in case you are the one person in the room that hasn’t heard of this analogy before, it’s based around the idea that if you were going to boil a frog, which I don’t recommend, by the way, but if you were, and you were going to boil that frog alive in a pan of water, you’re better off putting the frog in cold water, placing the pan on the stove and gently turning up the heat so the frog doesn’t know that it’s being boiled alive, until it’s too late. The converse of this is, of course, you just throw the frog into a pan of bubbling water on the stove and it jumps right out and it escapes!

Now, obviously, everyone in this room today can understand why this analogy has been used so often, as it clearly applies directly to the struggle that we are in. Since 1945, there have been sweeping changes to almost every aspect of British life. And if you took a snapshot of Britain in, let’s say, 1950, and compared it to the Britain that we live in today, I think we’d all agree [sound cut out] … Fresh water from a stream with bubbling hot water sat in a pan on a stove. And we didn’t go from 1945 to 2024 in a heartbeat or even in a short period of time. It took us over three quarters of a century. That’s longer than the average lifespan of the people who were alive when all of those changes were set in motion. The changes were drip fed to the public.

And in terms of the analogy that I began with, the analogy of the frog in the pan, the heat was turned up so very slowly over such a lengthy period of time. But here today in Britain in 2024, I finally think that the overused analogy of the frog being boiled is starting to lose its relevance. As since the election of Keir Starmer and the current Labour government, the heat has been turned up so quickly that I think it would be impossible for anyone not to notice! In fact, the heat has been turned up so quickly that nearly everyone is talking about it now.

Now, as people have said, I’ve been around for a long time and it was once common for nationalists like myself who engaged with the public to be turned away or dismissed on the grounds that we were talking nonsense! I’ve spent over two decades trying to convince the public of both the reality and the gravity of the situation that we as a race and nation face. I have first hand knowledge of the way the public dismissed us.

Believe it or not, there was once a time when you could speak to members of the public and they didn’t believe mass immigration was even an issue. And they certainly would not have entertained the idea that White Britons would ever have faced the prospect of being a minority in their ancestral homeland.

What’s more, if you tried to inform people that as this process would take place, not only would White Britons be the ones to pay financially for the transition, but during that transition they would become an underclass, many people used to roll their eyes. They would even laugh and mock you for what you were saying.

To many, the future that we warned of was simply preposterous! It was a fantasy! Or worse still, it was a conspiracy theory! And I’ve had that argument thrown into my face more times than I care to remember.

But over the last three and a half months, things have changed dramatically. There has been a massive, a seismic political shift in Britain. A shift that has been overseen and stage managed by what is undoubtedly the most nakedly anti-White and pro-migrant government this country has ever seen! One that puts both the Blair and Sunak regimes to shame. This shift is the equivalent of turning up the heat under the pan, not by several degrees, but by such a factor that the frog immediately takes note.

Who would have thought back in June that less than four months later we would have seen the murder of three little White girls by the son of migrants? Spontaneous mass anti-migrant protests on the streets of cities the length and breadth of the country. A brutal police clampdown like nothing we have ever witnessed before. 24 hour politicised courts being convened to deal with speech and thought criminals! The Prime Minister going on television to tell us he is forming special police forces to simply focus on Internet hate crimes. New legislation is now being draughted to criminalise those who speak out against migration.

[09:38]

But on top of all of that, there is a raft of new economic cash grabs, including a discriminatory policy that withdraws vital winter fuel payments from over 10 million, overwhelmingly White, pensioners in order to ensure that a raft of diverse and progressive policies can still be funded. But whilst all this is happening, whilst Labour is stripping us of our rights and signing off on what could effectively be a policy that leads to a cull of elderly White Britons, they have also been preparing an amnesty for over 100,000 illegal immigrants, as well as removing the final few remaining blockades to migrants entering the country.

And all these new Britons that are going to be granted the right to stay here, they won’t be facing the same financial crisis that us true Brits will! As Labour is committed to spending millions, if not billions, on making sure these people are cared for in every way imaginable! I have to emphasise this again, this is all within four months of Starmer being elected. They have not just turned up the temperature a little, they have gone straight to gas Mark 10 in the blink of an eye.

And on top of that, they are not even trying to hide it! Now at one time governments, especially the Conservatives, always the Conservatives, would usually dangle a carrot in order to soften the blow. But the current Labour establishment are so totally shameless and anti-White that they don’t even do that! Things have changed so much so that I don’t think going up to people and talking about migration and the idea of Whites becoming a minority would be something that anyone contested anymore.

Now, sure, I think you would find liberals out there, and those liberals would say:

“Yeah, the demographic shift is happening.”

And they’d be celebrating it. But they’d still admit that it was happening. They would say:

“They celebrated it.”

Rather than denying it.

But more importantly than accepting the facts on migration, which are of course important, is the fact that people are now aware that we live under a two tier system. A two tier system is in place where the indigenous people of these islands are automatically placed at a disadvantage when compared to both new arrivals and those from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Now, granted, the rules are a little more complex than what I have just stated, obviously White Britons who are part of the ruling elite, Whites who are part of far-Left organisations, or Whites who are part of degenerate, sickening subcultures, will get a pass. But normal White working folk are now clearly Second Class citizens! And worse still, if you are White and if you’re speaking out against mass immigration, multiculturalism or talking about demographic change, you will be treated as the lowest of the low! And you will have fewer rights than any other group in the country!

Now this in itself is not news to anyone in this room. We’ve known this was coming for a long time. We know if a member of an anti-fascist organisation punches someone, the police don’t care. If a nationalist defends himself and it’s self defence, you’re getting arrested. If a young black male sets fire to the Union Jack at the Cenotaph, it’s a suspended sentence. If a young White male kicks a policeman because three little White girls were murdered, it’s off to jail for 26 months!

And again, this isn’t news to us. We’ve seen this creeping up. We’ve known this was coming for years and we’ve spent, some of us, decades trying to warn the public.

But in the last few months, the dam has finally broken, when it comes to talking about this issue. The issue of “two tier policing” has gone mainstream. The term has been used in Parliament, in the media and in almost every major newspaper. The heat has been turned up so quickly that not even the press can deny what is happening. And the public are no longer deriding or ignoring what we say. They are openly voicing our talking points, which are increasingly becoming part of the everyday discourse in workplaces, in social clubs, in pubs and in homes all over Britain. This is a watershed moment for nationalists here in the UK! And it represents not some small or incremental shift, but a massive jump! But that jumps before you all start celebrating presents both great opportunities, but also serious dangers.

Let’s start with the good stuff. Let’s start with the opportunities. Never before has immigration been such a hot topic. Never before have so many people been openly concerned about demographic change. This isn’t just reflected in the way normal people are speaking. We’ve seen a massive change in the way that formerly race blind politicians, content creators, and influencers are reporting on the issue of immigration and anti-White policymaking. All of a sudden there is a palpable fear about the prospect of the UK becoming a country where the indigenous population are a minority. And there is also this growing concern of how White people would be treated if they were a minority. Even Nigel Farage has finally spoken about the ethnic makeup of our cities and even made an election pledge about deporting people.

Finally, the world is accepting the talking points that we have pushed for generations. The truth is breaking through!

[17:55]

However, we should not rejoice too much, because there’s a lot of negatives to this as well. The obvious negative is the way that Keir Starmer and the Labour government are approaching this mass awakening. In short, they are set on two courses of action.

The first is that they wish to accelerate mass immigration into Britain. The establishment have clearly acknowledged that there is a race going on between migration and the public consciousness of migration. On one hand, migration is increasing, but on the other, the public are now more aware that migration is this big threat and that it affects their lives in so many ways.

The race taking place now will decide whether Whites will become a minority before they become racially conscious enough on a wide enough scale to prevent themselves from becoming a minority. And the establishment is not run by idiots. They know how crucial this race is! Starmer and his cabinet know that if White people were to wake up before they were outnumbered, the game is up! Migration is ending, it will be reversed and we will remain a majority.

On the other hand, conversely, they also know if they can increase migration and Whites slip under a certain percentage of the population, it’s effectively game over! White Britons at that point will be destined to minority status!

So the first course of action the Starmer government will be set upon is to speed up White replacement to levels that we have never seen before. And on top of all of that, they have something going in their favour. They already know that we are reaching that tipping point, that the point of no return is not very far off at this juncture. With hundreds of thousands of White Britons leaving the country every year to run from this nightmare, with millions of migrants coming in with birth rates being overwhelmingly in favour of migrant communities, they will surely at this point, think that victory is in their grasp.

And if you want a bit of perspective on this isn’t just me saying this, I’m going to give you the latest figures. It was either this week or last week a report was published. Over the last 12 months. For the first time since 1976, deaths outstripped births here in the UK. Now, you don’t have to be a genius to work out that should lead to a falling population. Yes? But over the same 12 months, our population grew by the fastest rate it ever has in history! We cannot hide from the fact that we are now being replaced faster than we ever have before.

Now, you think that’s bad, but their second, and I said that was the first course of action. Their second course of action is actually worse than the first. And I know what you’re thinking, how on earth could something be worse than speeding up mass immigration to the point where we become a minority even faster? Well, it’s simple.

Their second course of action is to effectively terrorize White people so that even if Whites become racially conscious on a much larger scale, most of those who understand the truth will be too scared, too browbeaten, to ever speak out about the issue! Effectively meaning that the racially conscious White Britons will sit in silence rather than stand up and join our chorus of dissent.

Now, the astute amongst you will have noticed I used a term there. I said “terrorize”. And I use that term for a specific reason. You see, whilst the government loves to use the word “terrorism” to describe those who espouse views that they don’t like, there is a bitter irony to them using that word in such a way. You see, the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” came into English use as translations of words used in France during the period known as “The Reign of Terror” that took place between 1793 and 1794.

And during that era, the newly installed French government punished, usually by death, those people who were thought to be against the ongoing revolution. Those words came into existence thanks to a gruesome and protracted period of state sponsored violence. It is quite amazing really. The words terrorism and terrorist were originally words used to describe brutal acts of oppression by the State directed against those who spoke out against the state. Or in many cases, those acts of brutal oppression were used against people who were merely perceived to be going against the state. And that is exactly what we’re seeing here now in Britain!

When you see mothers dragged out of their homes for social media posts, when you see working men sent to prison for shouting at police officers, and when you see hard working fathers jailed for minor offences like throwing a traffic cone towards police officers we are living in times of political oppression that can only be described as “state sponsored terror”! We are moving toward a point where holding the wrong opinions will be seen as almost a capital crime, where saying the wrong words to the wrong person will see you receive a sentence longer than what a sex offender would receive.

And this worrying shift towards a complete and total clampdown on freedom of speech and freedom of expression is exactly what I would have predicted from this Labour government. This clampdown has the potential to be the most comprehensive in history, because it is backed by a surveillance state that is unrivaled!

But just as worryingly, it will also be supported by the same disgusting, sniveling people who snitched on their neighbours during the Covid lockdowns. The kind of people who phoned the police when people on their street didn’t come out of their homes at the allotted time to clap like demented seals for the NHS.

Make no mistake, we are now presented with the greatest opportunity that nationalists have seen in a lifetime! But we are also presented with the most draconian laws, the most oppressive system, and a surveillance network that makes anything written in 1984 look like a joke!

[27:50]

But the talk of this takes me back to a different time, a time when I was a young man and how politics was when I first joined this struggle. When I first got involved, I joined the BNP. At the time, the BNP was trying to hide their re-migration policy. The party played down talk of sending people home. We never spoke of it, we never featured it in publicity material and we actually treated it as if it was our dirty little secret. It was something that we spoke of behind closed doors.

We called it the Repatriation Policy. And the party watered it down! Hid it on their website, and had a policy of never speaking about it, never putting it on leaflets, never talking about it at meetings, and definitely never, ever mentioning it in a media interview!

Today, however, several decades on “re-migration” is a buzzword. For the first time in my lifetime, re-migration is a rallying cry that is posted tens of thousands of times a day on social media. Deportation is demanded by sitting MPs. Normal people are discussing sending them back!

[applause]

Remigration for the first time in a generation is seen not just as a viable solution, but as a necessary solution! Remigration is not just the battle cry of nationalists, but something that normal people are now openly desiring. Remigration is now rightly seen as the only solution that can save us from becoming a minority. It is what we need in order to survive!

But before we celebrate and before we cheer, there is a flip side to that. Remigration is also a term that could soon become illegal. Calls for re-migration and deportation could well be outlawed as terms that are “likely to stir up racial hatred”. And I say “likely” because that is the new word that will be the new bar when deciding whether speech is hate speech. At one time, speech would have to be abusive, insulting or threatening.

But now the Labour government wished to change this to the lower threshold of merely “likely to stir up racial hatred”.

So on one hand, we see a golden opportunity, we see progress and we see the public increasingly accepting our talking points in larger and larger numbers. And most of all, we are finally seeing re-migration being discussed, normalised and even adopted in other Western nations.

But on the other hand, we have these draconian laws, a surveillance state, two tier justice and a clampdown on our freedoms that even George Orwell would never have predicted. Make no mistake my friends, this is a high stakes game. Everything is on the line! All the chips are on the table! And we stand to gain everything. But we also stand to personally forfeit everything if the state singles us out for persecution.

And I’m not going to stand here and lie to you. The risk is real. There are people now in jail cells serving multi-year sentences for saying the wrong thing, attending the wrong protest, or even publishing stickers that the Crown stated were completely legal.

So the question that people will ask me is:

“Where do we go from here?”

Well, we are going to do something that no other group has ever attempted to do here in the UK.

Firstly, we will remain as the community building group we have always been. At the centre of everything we do will remain this community, but we will become an indigenous rights advocacy and pressure group. The only group in the UK that will fight for the rights of the indigenous people of this country who face discrimination, abuse or even jail. We will use this community that we have built to be both a support network and a shield wall for those whom the system attacks.

And the thing that makes me the most proud is that we have already begun doing this. Since the recent anti-migrant protests, we as a community have already raised £15,000 for the families of those who have been jailed for either speech crimes, non-crimes, such as shouting at the police, or being present when disorder took place, and for people who were jailed for minor infractions.

[applause]

And this is a bold move, not just because no one else is doing it, but also because I believe it’s the one thing our people need the most. They need a community that stands behind them when the state comes knocking on their door!

But that sadly brings me to the most uncomfortable part of what I’m going to say today. With this clampdown, with this high stakes battle for our future, with tensions in the country reaching boiling point and with political persecution reaching levels that we have never seen before, I expect that some people who were once very active in this movement will take their leave. The idea of going to jail or becoming a social pariah will simply be too much for them. These people will look at political prisoners like Sam Melia, and whilst they will admire them and want to support them, they will be terrified of being in their shoes.

Some people will now decide certain things can’t be discussed. They will quietly fall in line with the government’s new mandates, and they will behave like trained dogs, understanding exactly what their masters expect of them.

But I’m sure there is a question here for me. What will I do? And I say I because I am speaking for me. And on this topic, I can’t speak for you. But I will carry on despite the associated risks, because I believe more than anything that what we do is right!

[standing applause]

And people have asked me this. When I say people, I mean members of the public, people in this room, my friends, even my family. They’ve said:

“Mark, is this worth going to jail for? Was this all worth losing your bank accounts? Was this all worth becoming a social pariah that can’t do many of the things that normal people do?”

And I look at them and smile and say:

“The answer is unequivocally yes!”

[applause]

[38:11]

You see, sometimes in life there are bigger things at stake than your own individual well being, your own financial security, and your own social status. From a young age, I acknowledged that the most important thing was the survival of people of European descent!

[applause]

I acknowledged that if we as a people cease to exist, anything that I achieve as an individual in my life would be irrelevant. And now I look at the current situation and I know the risks are greater than ever! I know the establishment will continue to tighten the noose around our necks, choking our freedoms.

But I have done this for long enough to know that the establishment’s actions do not come from a place of strength. Instead, they come from a place of fear and uncertainty. The establishment knows that the cracks in the Multicultural Project are growing by the day. And that’s why they are desperate to pass these new laws as they know the truth is breaking through. And their only hope now is not to hide the truth, because they can’t do that anymore! Their only hope now is to stop people speaking the truth that they already know! They aren’t jailing nationalists because they’re winning. They are jailing nationalists because they’re finally losing their grasp on power!

And that’s why, at this crucial juncture, despite the increased risks, I believe it is time to grit our teeth, to dig our heels in and fight harder:

“But what about our freedom?”

People will cry. Well, the answer to that is simple. Being free is about being able to live as you wish. Being able to say what you want, to be able to do what you please, and to associate with those whom you love. If you can’t do those things, if you choose to self censor, and if you give up on your beliefs, if you are forced to turn your back on your comrades and friends, one thing is for sure, you are not free. You are a prisoner in their system. But worse still, you are a prisoner by consent! And I for one, am not going to consent to being a prisoner of their system. I do not consent to spending my life on my knees for anyone. Especially not a system that despises me, my family, my friends and my people.

[applause]

My message today is clear. Despite the hardships, despite the increasing oppression, and despite what may seem like overwhelming odds, we will never be silenced!

But more so, we will give a voice to those who the system tries to silence. We will be the support network for the most oppressed, trampled people in this country, white people who dare to oppose their own replacement. We are engaged in this struggle because we understand one thing. The most precious thing in the whole world is our people! And the survival of our people is non-negotiable!

So despite the increasing tyranny that we face, we will never stop fighting. And even if our brave comrades are arrested and dragged away from their families and imprisoned, their heads will not be bowed, their flame will not dim, and they will not be forgotten. Quite the opposite in fact. Their heads will be held up high. Their names will be known by more people than they could ever have imagined. Their fight against this system will be spoken of not only the length and breadth of the country, but it will be spoken of all over the Western world.

Because those who dare to fight in the darkest of times are the heroes that will ensure that tomorrow belongs to us!

Thank you.

[44:10]

[long, stand up applause]

[44:35]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/3/2024 = 40)

@The_Real_Batman
1 day ago
I honestly think now, the political route is not where effort should be given.
The woodlander did make a good point on this subject. Creating a community of sorts is the most beneficial method.

13
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
I agree!

5
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
i agree

3
0
Open Borders for Israel
1 day ago
$5.00
Mark Collett is the bravest man in the UK

11
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
He has been very effective within the wiggle room you have.

2
0

@cheflad
1 day ago
Great Speech.

7
0
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Great speech, acknowledging the problem is the first step to solving it

6
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
The message is still being suppressed but I’m optimistic.

3
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I am optimistic as well all we need is a certain number of our people to wake up and wanting to do something about it and it is game over for them

2
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
community is everythig.

4
0

@Andy1967UK
1 day ago
Great speech
Play @ 1.25speed

2
0

@PureNomad
1 day ago
$14.88
So soon after listening to Ayatollah’s speech… its hard to listen without thinking of his Collett impersonation
Good speech mate, agree that we are no longer frogs being slow cooked, we are being roasted alive screaming.

4
0

@6079SmithW
1 day ago
God bless you Mr. Collett.

4
0
megazord
1 day ago
The All-time Anglo

4
0

@WhiteLightKnight
1 day ago
Superb speech. Difficult to see anything in this speech that wouldn’t chime with the vast majority people in this country.

2
0
Rusty-Hinge
1 day ago
Bravo Mark.
Excellent speech. I wholeheartedly agree with every point, especially regarding our own advocacy group.

2
0
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
Hey Mark, changing the hearts and minds of people is a gigantic task for sure.
When someone makes a stand we see the response from governments and lobbiests.
We always view the job ahead as one of alienation of immigrants and they are left out of any conversation, they are essentially bystanders watching their host country’s implode.
I think we should use these groups more effectively to wake the NPC’s up.
By use, I mean have conversations with them on their views
, what would they do if in our situation or if it happened in their country’s and what solutions would they take.
Actually what would they do to their government if such crimes happened in their lands.
The responses no doubt would be one’s that would shock the people sitting on the fence.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
I have to disagree with the boiling frog analogy for the US. All the signs were there but Americans, especially fluoride and lead poisoned boomers, just didn’t care. They still don’t care.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
Is Irish Nationalism compatible with British Nationalism? I’m neither just curious.

0
0
=============

BitChute Comments

Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024
639 Views – 2 days ago
Channel
Mark Collett
23.2K Subscribers
MarkCollett
Sensitivity – Normal (BBFC 12)
My speech from the 2024 Patriotic Alternative Conference. Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cm…
Show more

2 hours ago
JamesWood
Smashingly good speech, unbelievable that PA isn’t the number 1 most popular party in the UK right now.

14 hours ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Massive immigration. Industry is more concentrated than ever in fewer and fewer hands. Retail is disappearing. So where are they needed?
Edited 13 hours ago
1
0

9 hours ago
Pensive11
In demographic numbers. They’re here to replace us, and they’re doing a great job. Not long to go now.
1
0

2 hours ago
JamesWoodPensive11
It’s nearly game over. It will be game over by 2050

19 hours ago
Intro Skipper
Duke & Slattery show was worth a listen.
https://media.blubrry.com/rbn/ins.blubrry.com/rbn/stream_2024-10-24_120000.mp3

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Payback for saving those poor jews and letting them write the Versailles treaty.
2
0

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Trump is the next Churchill. WW3 in 2025. Expect amnesty for illegals and more legal immigrants, and the worst draconian hate laws for speaking up, esp against jews, who everyone knows control money, credit and media. Rothschilds control the Sqare Mile City of London and the Bank of England and banks across the world.u
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
Trump is a chicken, both of them are. When crowds chanted to Hitler SIEG HEIL,Hail victory, Hitler said to them, change that word Sieg, to Kampf, Battle. Kampf Heil, hail the battle. Thats what is coming!
Edited a day ago
0
1

a day ago
totenkopfelite
Bravo and Hail Victory
1
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Mark, don’t ever call me a comrade.
0
3

2 days ago
50Quid
Oh yes, before I forget you will have BBBEE (Broad Based Black economic empowerment) If you are a white man “YOU WILL” have a non-white business partner who “WILL” own a 51% stake hold of your company so that in a few years once he has learned the in’s and out’s of your business he can turn around and legally fire you and there’s [show more]

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Don’t blink ’cause for all the black-empowerment bullshit, Asians/Indians/Chinese are real the benefactors. Where I work, they cry about “not doing enough for blacks” while the office is 80% Chinese/Indian. Blacks will be prominent in media/movies/Hollywood, but I don’t expect them to be in the boardrooms across the country.
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
That same story about blacks has been going on before the 60s when I came into the world. And its the same bullshit still today. After more than 5 decades blacks HAVE GONE BACKWARDS and taken countries backwards. If they are so great like the movies, why is every black country in history – an absolute shithole and worse?
2
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Wait for AA and BEE/DEI.
You will not be able to even get a job because you are white!
1
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
It should be clear to any thinking person the nonsense when authorities tell you those masses are needed to keep the economy going. First principle, the economy serves the people – the people dont serve the economy. And millions of semi-literates, racists and criminals who never built a pinhead in their existence can only irreparably destroy what whites have built up over centuries.
7
0
Hide replies

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Did EMJ ban you. What a pos EMJ is.
Edited a day ago

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Whites shitting on Whites are far more dangerous than any jew. And unfortunately the White race is full of traitors and liberals. Apparently selling books or a good job is worth throwing lesser brothers under the bus and giving the country away.
Edited 2 days ago
3
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Just dont call Jones a jew, like I did, or he will block you.You can call a jew anything but when you call him jew, he is exposed. EMJ is a jew, hiding behind Catholic religion. Notice how he slanders us White peoples and everything that s of white Europe. And all his garbage”categories”. Jones has German jewish heritage. Thats [show more]
Edited a day ago
2
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Sadly those whites(I have brothers like that), just cant see through the fraud. They have no other background and have been educated in MU, Minneapolis Uni and Hollywood jewish poison. They are warped. It is devastating. The only salvation, for me, is to know the deepest truth. Its a solitary journey.
Edited a day ago
3
0

2 days ago
glasiad
The future is NOT in political parties of any stripe. The future lies in direct representatives answerable and accountable only to their constituents.
6
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
I think Mark Collett is an excellent speaker and person. And I entirely support his mission.
12
0

2 days ago
Colin-Mark
I concur
4

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 4,629

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sun, Nov 3, 2024 — Published post. Transcript completed = 45/45 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee and BitChute comments (40).

Joel Davis – Fuck off We’re Full – with Tom and Jacob – Oct 24, 2024 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:31:02 +0000

Joel Davis

Fuck off We’re Full

with Tom and Jacob

Thu, Oct 24, 2024

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Tom Sewell and Jacob Hersant discuss the following:

Recent activism by their nationalist group in Melbourne (0:00-5:00) and in the NSW town of Corowa.

“We were discussed on the news again tonight ”

They analyze media coverage of their activities (5:00-10:00)
“Obviously, they’re trying to make us look bad, but we will analyze this ”

The media is biased against them (10:00-15:00)
“The media is going to always have control of their own narrative ”

Discuss strategies for gaining public support (15:00-20:00)
“We’re impacting the psyche of the Australian people ”

Their tactics are working to spread their message (20:00-25:00)
“It’s taking all the time to start working, but it is starting to work ”

They criticise other nationalist groups’ strategies (25:00-30:00)
“There’s no other way but taking the fight to the system ”

Discuss a recent protest they conducted (30:00-35:00)
“We wanted to get, because we came up with the idea in the group chat with the boys ”

Confrontations with counter-protesters and police using pepper spray (35:00-40:00)
“Eventually it made its way across to the other eye, and then I was fucked ”

Victory despite being pepper sprayed (40:00-45:00)
“We took about two minutes to just regroup, and then we just marched straight back in ”

Criticise Left-wing protesters (45:00-50:00)
“They never take it. They always are just obsessed with gesticulating ”

Discuss media coverage of their protest (50:00-55:00)
“The coverage was awesome ”

Their tactics are more effective than other nationalist groups (55:00-60:00)
“We’re proving that if you have vision and if you have boldness and creativity, that even with a very small group of men, you can do incredible things ”

Discuss plans for future activism (60:00-65:00)
“We’ve got more planned. So watch this space ”

Criticise mainstream politicians (65:00-70:00)
“What’s the narrative of Peter Dutton? What’s the narrative of whatever faggot Adam Band that runs the Greens? There’s no narrative.”

Analyze more media coverage of their protest (70:00-75:00)
“They love to hate us ”

Discuss strategies for deporting immigrants (75:00-80:00)
“I would say stage one is just like, cancel all temporary visas, period ”

Argue for targeting specific immigrant groups (80:00-85:00)
“You could say, we’re going to deport all the Chinese and we’re going to deport all the Indians ”

Discuss potential scenarios for mass deportations (85:00-90:00)
“If there’s World War Three or this war with China, all the ethnic Chinese are going to need to be put in concentration camps ”

Criticise refugees and asylum seekers (90:00-95:00)
“These people are scum! They’re human garbage.”

Discuss Donald Trump and US politics (95:00-100:00)
“He’s got all the momentum.”

Debate embryo selection technology (100:00-105:00)
“I support embryo selection. I think it’s a good technology.”

Discuss strategies for racial purity re sperm selection (105:00-110:00)
“I’d just roll the dice and just do it, man. If you got the money, pick for a purely European child ”

Criticise mainstream conservative figures (110:00-115:00)
“James Lindsay, who’s this American conservative. He’s a classical liberal ”

Discuss monarchy and Republicanism in Australia (115:00-120:00)
“I don’t support the Australian Republican movement ”

Criticise the current British monarchy (120:00-125:00)
“The current monarchy go along with the agenda ”

Discuss Aboriginal politician Lidia Thorpe (125:00-130:00)
“She’s just a good target for normal Australians to hate ”

Analyze more media coverage of their protest (130:00-135:00)

Criticise refugees and asylum seekers again (135:00-140:00)
“They’re referring to them as refugees, but they’re technically not refugees ”

Mock Left-wing protesters (140:00-145:00)
“We want permanent visas! It’s just gay.”

Comment about a counter-protester (145:00-150:00)
“He looks like an eternal jew ”

Criticise asylum seekers’ claims (150:00-155:00)
“They literally complain that they can’t go back to visit because if they do, they won’t be let back ”

Mock Left-wing arguments for accepting refugees (155:00-160:00)
“It’s not about Left or Right. You have the most egregious Lefty you’ve ever fucking seen ”

Criticise mainstream media coverage (160:00-165:00)
“He’s like a political radical, a communist. No one in Australia agrees with his ideology ”

Promote their next show (170:00-175:00)
“Blair will be back next week. He’s in Britain. He’s on tour.”

Express satisfaction with their recent activism (175:00-180:00)
“We’ll try and keep out of the news this week!”

Close with “Australia for the White man! White fucking power!”

– KATANA]

https://rumble.com/v5jx0nh-fuck-off-were-full.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/f-off-we-full:d

my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis

follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

https://x.com/joeldavisx

Published on Thu, Oct 24, 2024

Description

Fuck Off We’re Full
October 24, 2024
397 views
62
1
Support
Save
Repost
Share
joeldavis
@joeldavis
4,413 followers
Join
Follow
my social media links:
https://bio.link/joeldavis
Tom’s telegram:
https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell
(not) Tom’s twitter:
https://x.com/TomS38256360
jacob hersant
joel davis
national socialist network
thomas sewell
white australia
File size
3.91 GB
Less
13.48
532 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 31,736 – Duration: 179 mins)

Joel Davis: Decided to just go live because Thomas should be here in any second. Jacob is actually coming over, so we’re going to have Tom and then Jacob on the show this evening. There’s no Blair. Blair, as you might have seen on social media, is in Britain right now, actually. He spoke at the Patriotic Alternative conference last week, and he’s doing a bit of tourism.

Here’s Thomas. We are live. How are you?

Thomas Sewell: What’s up?

Joel Davis: But yeah, Blair couldn’t make it this evening because he’s traveling. But he’ll be on the show next week, and I’m sure he’ll have a lot of interesting things to say about his time in Britain. So that’ll be interesting to get his takes next week. And Jacob, as I said, we’ll be over in about 20 minutes or so, and he’ll join me here on the show.

But in the meantime. Yeah, obviously we had another big activism on Tuesday afternoon here in Melbourne. And maybe we’ll try and hold our balls until Jacob gets here and not discuss it so that we can discuss it with Jacob, because he’ll be here in 20 minutes.

So in the meantime, we were discussed on the news again tonight, but they were discussing something else. Some of the boys up in the Riverina chapter, which are the guys that are kind of based near the New South Wales, Victoria border, near Corowa, where we did our last activism a couple weeks ago. They went back to the town over the weekend and they distributed flyers. Jacob wrote up a flyer just talking about the problems with immigration and how White people need to come together. And just a little link to our website and everything. They were distributed.

And also we printed off just a few paragraphs from the Noticer dot News article on what happened in Corowa. And we put that with The Noticer headline, and then a link to the full article at the bottom. And they were distributed by the boys up there. I don’t know how many they handed out, but they got around. They made sure that they were distributed around.

And anyway, it was big enough story, apparently, that we handed out leaflets that it has to be on the news this evening. So we can’t stop getting publicity at the moment. I thought we’d watch this. It’s kind of interesting. Obviously, they’re trying to make us look bad, but we could analyze this.

Newsreader: (Nick Hose) The White supremacist group who clashed with police in Melbourne is increasing the stakes on the border. The neo-Nazis have now become a letterbox drop in Corowa and trying to recruit more men in black!

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) Twenty neo-Nazis driven out of Melbourne by force. This clash erupting in the city yesterday.

NSN: Australia for the White man! The rest must go!

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) All the while, a more sinister campaign flew under the radar and into letterboxes on the border.

Corowa Resident: (male) No, we’re not fans.

Corowa Resident: (female) I got it, I screwed it up. In the bin. That’s [words unclear] makes me. We don’t need it.

Corowa Resident: (female) It was just the language. The language was so unpleasant.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) The Noticer are peppered with hateful phrases like “imported scabs” claiming the nation is “infested with diversity”. Flyers quietly slid into the letterboxes of Corowa residents.

Cheryl Cook: (Federation Mayor) Totally unfair in the Corowa community, and rightly so, they’re enraged. They’re upset, and I might add, fearful too.

Chris Minns: (NSW Premier) I think it’s disgusting! And the people that are distributing that appalling literature should take a long, hard look at themselves.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) The group’s henchmen put one at every house on this street, exactly a week after they stormed the town and was sent packing after this stunt at the War Memorial. Their conspiracy that Australia is flooded with so-called non-White workers. But in Corowa, all workers are welcome!

Corowa Resident: (female) The town is trying to embrace them. Yes, they might buy things and send them home, but that’s their prerogative.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) New South Wales police are well aware of this recent development and are monitoring the situation closely. But the group have also been targeting children, with a group of school kids approached by a man in all black who tried to indoctrinate them, too.

Corowa Resident: (female) Neo-Nazis need to know they’re not welcome in Corowa.

Cheryl Cook: (Federation Mayor) We don’t want this in Australia. It’s very unAustralian.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) Jacqueline Stanley, Seven News.

Joel Davis: What’s unAustralian importing a bunch of non-Australians! That’s pretty [word unclear]

Thomas Sewell: [laughing] Ahh! Yes, it’s a “conspiracy” that we’re spreading. That Australia is being flooded with non-White workers. This is “the conspiracy” that we’re spreading. It’s a conspiracy, you see?

It is a conspiracy! They’re correct. The elites are conspiring to replace us. That is true.

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t put it as a conspiracy because it’s not. Conspiracy implies that they’re secretly organising it. They’re openly organising it.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s true.

Joel Davis: There was an article in the Border Mail, which is the biggest newspaper distributed in that area near where Corowa is, in those border towns along the Murray [River]. And it was written about this, about these leaflets. They were distributed on the weekend and they only discussed it on the news tonight, probably after we made the news last night, they decided to pick it up as a national story.

And in that article, they quoted a local councillor who was saying that:

“Well, we have to bring in foreigners to go and work at the pig farm because there just isn’t enough White people, locals that want to work there.”

Apparently. So he openly admitted that we were correct. And then he was saying that he wants JBS to come out and make a statement, and he wants the council to vote on a statement saying that they support bringing in foreign workers. And that he’s working within the council to create an official, you know, council resolution that they support replacing the people of the town.

So we’re conspiracy theorists! Meanwhile, the literal local government is openly stating that they’re doing it and that it’s a great thing!

So it’s not happening, but it is happening, and it’s great, that it’s happening! All at the same time.

[06:25]

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. They just interviewed a bunch of people that just told the media what they wanted to hear. I mean, no one had any substance. Like, what was that lady saying? Like:

“Oh, yeah, so they’re here and they buy some things and they send them home. But that’s their prerogative.”

It’s like, what does that even mean? What are you talking about? And they managed to find one normal looking White guy that’s like:

“Oh, I’m not a supporter.”

It’s like:

“Okay, he’s not a supporter.”

All right, is he a supporter of the town going from 2% brown to 50% brown? Is he a supporter of that? Did anyone ask that? So it’s always loaded questions. They don’t ask the correct questions. Well, they ask the correct questions for their narrative.

We know that the locals of Corowa are in support of us. A big percentage. I can’t say which exact percentage, but a lot of these people don’t want to go in front of the news, because they can see every single facet of the system, the government, the media, and a lot of the locals have told us they’re genuinely afraid of JBS. They’re afraid to lose their jobs, if they haven’t already. They’re afraid for their family members. They’re afraid for the amount of connection that JBS has to all the other businesses, in the area.

That’s new. We’re getting pop ups now. [chat comment]

Joel Davis: Yeah, I can. I can make things pop up.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, and that’s a good point as well. Dreamweaver says:

“Interviewed a bunch of Boomers who aren’t affected economically by these third worlders.”

That’s a good point. They didn’t interview any young people. And I think you’ll find that the young people are the most affected by cost of living. They’re the most affected by pressure on the job market, the supply and demand of just basic jobs.

And, yeah, they’re also the most politically radical Left and Right. So you would get both sides if you interviewed left young people, you’d get a more extreme Left and you’d get a more extreme Right.

So, yeah, the media is dishonest. We know this. But it’s important that they covered it. I think we’ve been in the news every day for like, weeks now. I can’t think of a day that we haven’t been in the news in Australia.

So the whole news cycle is turning into, like one part sports, one part bullshit politics with boring politicians, one part condemning White Australia, basically. One part condemning the men in black, the black block of bandits, the rebellion! You know what I mean? That’s what it’s turning into is like:

“Public order is low, the rebellion is rising. We have to condemn the rebellion!”

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, also, of course, it has to be pointed out that they probably did interview people in the town who said that they were supportive of us, but they’re not going to put that on the news, are they? Because it’s a hit piece.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, of course.

Joel Davis: But also as well, every time they do one of these news clips, they always say:

“Well, the police looking into it and investigating it.”

It’s like implying that we did something illegal. That like putting a piece of paper in someone’s letterbox is illegal. It’s not illegal! Putting a piece of paper in someone’s letterbox. I mean, it’s absurd! Why the police looking into something as minute as that? Shouldn’t they be worried about crime? Shouldn’t they be worried about people getting robbed or domestic violence or like, things that actually are important? That is their actual job. So, yeah, I mean, it’s just kind of ridiculous!

But I think it’s great because it’s desensitizing the public. Them constantly talking about us over and over and over and over again! The public are becoming more and more accustomed to the fact that we’re just a part of everyday Australian life. We’re part of the conversation. And more and more of them are starting to question why we are being treated in such a completely incongruent way with every other political group? Why we’re being treated like terrorists for simply doing peaceful protests and handing out leaflets? You know, if anyone else hands out leaflets or does peaceful protests, it pretty much doesn’t even make the news let alone is it an issue that is apparently, you know, illegal?

Thomas Sewell: The way the media and those., … What was it? I can’t even pronounce the name. What is it? Ratman or something? Isn’t there like a Chindian jeet Senator or MP called Ratman? Like Senator Ratman or MP Ratman. The brown chick that was on the news segment.

Joel Davis: I ratioed the fuck out of her on Twitter.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

Thomas Sewell: And she was saying:

“We attacked the protest!”

It’s called a counter-protest. They do it to us all the time. When we did Living Space for Whites, they came down, you know, 250 or so strong to counter-protest us. And then what did the media put in the news that night? They put in that anti-racist protesters and racist protesters clashed the city. They didn’t put down that there was a peaceful stop immigration rally by White Australians and they were just attacked and ambushed by the Left.

[11:41]

So this shows you how clear and obvious and why a lot of the strategies that people want to employ are never going to work.

A lot of people think that:

“Oh, but if we just presented ourselves better, if we just wore a suit and tie, if we just did all these other strategies, it would work.”

It’s like, you can do that you can do that strategy. Look how they treated those, I mean, those feminists, they’re not even Right-wing. They’re Left-wing. They’re just Left-wingers that are against trannies. And look at how they were treated by the media. They were basically treated as if they were on the same camp as us. So, I mean, that was part of our ploy.

But the point is that the media is going to always have control of their own narrative. They’re never going to be unbiased. They have an agenda and they’re going to promote that agenda. And that agenda is when White people protest:

“White people evil!”

No matter how you do it, evil, or it didn’t happen, basically. Because if they can’t smear you, they’re just not going to put it up. And brown people:

“Always mostly peaceful.”

[chuckling] No matter what they’re doing, they could be burning the city:

“Mostly peaceful!”

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Thomas Sewell: And if they aren’t burning the city down, then:

“Peaceful!”

And not just that, they celebrate it. They like when the abos do a big protest and there’s like 5,000 of them or something, the media put up:

“How amazing they are! How incredible they are! How they’re just magnificent, wonderful people! And just the most enormous protest and just the crowds and the atmosphere!”

Like, they talk it up. They do their own hype videos for them.

So yeah, people think they’re going to get a fair go from the media are delusional. This is the strategy that we have. It’s working. And what we’re doing is we’re impacting the psyche of the Australian people. They’re turning on the news and they’re like:

“Oh, fuck, Nazis versus refugees! Nazis versus trannies! Nazis versus this!”

It’s like we’re putting up opposition to everything that they don’t like. And, yeah, it’s working. It’s really working! It’s taking all the time to start working, but it is starting to work.

I mean, the comment sections are just, sometimes they’re like 95, 100 percent in our favour. Other times they’re like 70%.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, we went through some of the comments sections in response to the Corowa rally that we did last week on the show, like particularly all the Facebook Boomers in the Sky News comment section that were backing us up. And I was scrolling through a few comments sections about our rally the other day and other issues, and I’m seeing the same trend where a lot of Right-wingers are starting to defend us on the basis of:

“Well, how come the media is attacking them for doing the same thing that the Palestinian protesters are allowed to do or other Left-wing protest groups are apparently allowed to do, and the media gives them sympathetic coverage.”

But when we go out in the streets, apparently we’re horrible racists. You know, a lot of people were saying that we weren’t Nazis, even though we were, but they were trying to defend us. They’re trying to say:

“The media is smearing these guys as neo-Nazis. They just seem to be patriots like against immigration or whatever.”

And that’s funny, but it shows that people are starting to kind of feel like the attacks on us are attacks on them. That the fairness of the entire discourse and the political process in this country is being revealed to be totally fake and totally skewed against White people and totally skewed against patriots, nationalists and so on. And the attacks that are coming on us, basically forms of attacks on them.

And the more that they identify with us and see attacks on us as attacks on them, the better, because then they’re going to start to realise that the Nazis are the guys that are in their corner, up against ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government], up against the system, up against the government, up against the establishment.

So that’s what we’re trying to create with this. You know, the kind of dramatic confrontation in the street, the way that we march, the way that we carry ourselves, the way that I go on Twitter and so do you and others and just try and savage these politicians constantly. Just putting up a fight and more and more people are seeing that and realizing:

“Well, who else is putting up a fight?”

No one else has the balls to just go straight for the jugular on the whole system and say, like:

“We’re just going to take on all of you and we’re just going to openly defy you!”

And that’s so important that people start to realise that that defiance, which is supposed to be part of the Australian character, we were, this is a nation that was supposed to be built off convict stock in many ways, right? We’re supposed to be rebels. You know, we’re a nation that worshiped Ned Kelly, the outlaw bushranger. You know, we’re supposed to have that about us, that we don’t like authority, we don’t get pushed around.

But in the last few decades, this country has become cucked! Like, and I think the response to Covid really exemplified that. Obviously, where the country’s response to that was pathetic! Like, yeah, there was a protest movement and there was a lot of valiant people in that protest movement.

[17:00]

But overall, the vast majority of people were compliant, little like goy cattle. And when you react to authority so submissively, well, now authority knows that it can get away with anything. And that needs to be reversed. We need to reassert a hard defiance to win back actually respect from the establishment, to realise that:

“Hey, like, if you want to tyrannise over us, it’s going to be a fight. You aren’t just going to be able to get it for free!”

That’s the only way that you can win freedom in this world is if you’re going to fight for it! That’s the only way that you can secure your interests in this world, is if the people who are against you are afraid to take actions, to turn up the heat on you because they don’t want the heat turned up on them.

Like, I’m not going to name names, but I saw an article written by, frankly, an irrelevant nationalist leader that no one actually really knows, talking about why:

“It’s not the time to be openly declaring hostility against the system because we can’t afford to take a loss. We can’t afford to go out there and expose ourselves to the repression of the system and getting in trouble, essentially, and the movement will be set back if we do that, we have to stay in the shadows, stay in the safe places and build up slowly.”

And all I was reading was the rationalisation for doing nothing. That’s all I was reading. Because there is no other way but taking the fight to the system. Because the only way that you’re going to be able to win over the people to actually support you is if you show that you’re willing to take on the system on their behalf. If you’re going to the people and saying:

“Hey, I’m not really willing to be standing up to the enemy and taking the shots from the enemy, taking the heat from the system.”

Why would they respect you? Why would they care about your leadership? They’ve got no reason to because you’re not actually backing it up. So, it sucks! It sucks that we have to fight, but that’s just the reality. It’s either fight or die. That’s literally all politics fundamentally comes down to is, are you willing to fight for it or not? And if you’re not, and the enemy knows that you’re not, they’ll just run roughshod over you.

And that’s why the system is getting away with murder, essentially. And the egregiousness of how anti-White this system is, how egregious double standards that we just keep seeing over and over again! Injustice when it comes to immigration, when it comes to any issue, White people have no dignity. White people have no respect. White interests aren’t even allowed to be articulated. If you articulate White interests, you are castigated as some immoral social outcasts that apparently everyone must proactively condemn. And if you don’t proactively condemn them, you become persona non-grata in mainstream politics. And you can’t have anything to, or you can’t even work in a major corporation or be a prominent public figure in any respect. Like, you’re just totally marginalised.

Whereas every other group is able to have their victim narratives. And essentially they’re supposed to have the red carpet rolled out for them to waltz into the country and just be given all of our stuff! Given the whole country! We’re just supposed to just hand it over to these people just because they exist? It’s fucking ridiculous!

And that’s because White people are simply fucking not resisting. We’re not resisting. Like, it’s our fault. It’s our fault. We are literally pussified, bitchified as a fucking race! That we are just standing there and taking this. And we are trying to inspire the people to say:

“Hey, like, you don’t have to fucking take it anymore!”

And it’s kind of crude, but if we don’t do this, it’s done! Like, it’s over! Like, there’s no clean way. Let’s just pretend that we’re not actually racist and then gradually work within the paradigm of the system to secure our interests. That will not succeed. Like, ultimately, at some point, there’s going to have to be, no! White people deserve dignity. White people deserve representation. White Australians, we fucking own this country! We fucking built it! This is our fucking country! And we demand respect! We demand acknowledgement at the very least! But more than acknowledgement, we demand that our will be done! And like, that’s a crazy idea to most people. That just shows how warped the mindset of the masses really is.

So, I mean, this stuff is probably obvious to most people watching. And it’s so basic and fundamental, but it has to be explained because the amount of these fucking, … I saw Craig Kelly, who was a Senator for the Liberal Party, then he got kicked out of the Liberal Party for being too Right-wing.

And I think he ended up joining the United Australia Party. He lost the last election on that ticket. Then he joined the One Nation party and fell out with Pauline Hanson and left within a few months before any election had occurred. Now he seems to be flirting with the Libertarian Party. I wouldn’t be surprised if he tries to run for the Senate at the next election on the Libertarian Party ticket in New South Wales. And he’s like anti-immigration and he’s one of the most Right-wing mainstream politicians in Australia. But he was arguing with one of the accounts on Twitter called the White Australia Policy. That’s one thing that I like about Craig Kelly is that he’ll at least engage with people from our side somewhat online. No other politician really does that.

But what he was saying basically was that:

“Listen, like, you can’t put your anti-immigration stance in terms of race because then that means the Left can call you racist, we have to make anti-immigration, we have to give it some other reason. Like, we’re against immigration because it’s causing a housing crisis or it’s bad for Australian culture or something.”

But the subtext of what Craig was saying, because he was replying to an account that’s literally called the White Australia Policy, was that like:

“No, wink, wink, nudge, nudge. I agree with you, but you’re going about this the wrong way. Like, yes, obviously we want to keep Australia White, but we can’t say that!”

And it’s well, if we can’t say that, we’re not going to do it! Its really that simple.

[23:44]

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I don’t have anything to respond to that you just said, like, yeah, the article. I did see the article. I didn’t open it. I know the one you’re talking about. I believe it was called “The revolution will not be publicized” or something like that, which is an interesting axiom.

And one of my colleagues told me that it was sort of trying to go down a path of explaining a new form of meta-political guerrilla warfare. That’s interesting. I think ultimately let a thousand flowers blossom. I’ve had my disagreements with these kind of strategies. I’ve tried to do that in the past.

And what I found was it recruited people that had very little political agency. So then if your plan is to just grow slowly in the background for, say, ten years or eight years, two things, two problems with that. One, you’re giving up on everyone right now, and for the next eight years, that is politically motivated. And what you’re doing is you’re recruiting people that aren’t very politically motivated. But, and this is a word that I don’t use often. Jacob usually says it, but what you’re doing is you’re building ultimately, a “comfort club”.

Because if your plan is:

“Oh, we’ll do something in a year’s time or two years or three years or four years.”

Then you’re kind of going to recruit a group of people that will just perpetually ideas, man. And it breeds things like committees as well. Adolf Hitler stays very clearly in Mein Kampf that this is a bad way of organising.

So what separates the doers and the kind of, I wouldn’t use word “schemers”. It’s probably a bit too rough. But what separates the doers and the people that are kind of still thinking about how they’re going to go about doing it. That’s okay if you do that for a little bit, you should still try to do as much as you can while you’re kind of planning the next stage. That’s how everything happens.

But experience is learnt through action, and that’s why we’re doing what we’re doing. We’re putting as much energy as we can trying to find a solution in real time. And we’re recruiting other people that are also men of action. Like when you see us marching in the street or you see us training or whatever, the whole idea of it, of getting active or these men of action is that you’re building a culture of getting work done, versus building a culture of, Hitler says in Mein Kampf:

“The committee men are permanently pregnant with ideas they never are able to give birth to.”

And I experience this a lot. There’s a lot of people involved in the movement, and a lot of them, sorry, in the wider movement that aren’t members of the organisation that support us. You know, through thoughts and prayers and sometimes financially, and a small subset of those people feel the need to tell us how to do what we’re doing and how to do it better. And it’s usually something that’s not needed to be done by myself, it’s usually something that they could do.

And when I say to them, because my go to whenever I get this is, I say:

“Why don’t you do it?”

And they will say:

“No, no, no, this is not something I can do. This is something you need to do!”

And so:

“Oh, I take instructions from strangers on the Internet. That’s how I need to run the organisation. I need to do this for you, not the other way around, not, hey, why don’t you get involved? Or, hey, why don’t you build this project?”

So I find that it builds a culture of people like that. And that’s what we had in the early days. It was like a social club. It was a comfort club. And there was just so many ideas floating around. And of the original 21 guys in Melbourne of this comfort club, when I actually said:

“Okay, let’s build a gym, let’s make a gym. Like, I’ll put the money down I want some trump bucks.”

And, yeah, like, I think only three guys trained with me out of 21. I was like:

“Okay, all right.”

So we want to build this. Everyone wanted to build this. Everyone agreed to building this. Everyone put their hand on the table and said:

“We’re going to do it.”

And then when it’s actually time to do it, …

And so that’s a problem with it. You wait eight years, you’re going to waste eight years with that group of people, or most of them, the vast majority of them. So it’s better to just recruit high quality people that want to get work done now.

But as I said, let a thousand flowers blossom. There’s a lot of different strategies out there. It’s good to have waves of momentum, but in the absence of action it can have a habit of giving up on all these people. Like, how many people support us right now? How many people have the narrative? Well, what I was saying on Twitter the other day was the idea that most people simply aren’t political and we are politicizing them. We’re charging them with politics that could be useful in eight years time.

And I think that’s what everyone should be trying to do, not just form comfort clubs. People should be trying to work out in whatever way possible to politicise the public! To make them pick a side. That’s ultimately what we need division in society. We need to divide the people that hate Australia and hate White people. We need to divide them away from the people that love Australia and love White people. That’s our ultimate goal! We can’t secure a future for our children without getting away or separating or segregating or building separate institutions.

So, yeah, it’s frustrating some of the time.

[29:33]

Joel Davis: Sorry, I thought you were finished.

Thomas Sewell: I was just saying it’s frustrating that people, … I do get the feeling sometimes that a lot of eyes are on us, and I do feel these little digs sometimes at what we’re doing. Like, the word used in the article was “recklessness”. That recklessness has gotten us nowhere. It’s like, recklessness, like, what, on the weekend or on Tuesday? Like, standing up for the people of Corowa? Like, no one knew about that’s recklessness? Like, we’re not as polite as we could be. I don’t know how to explain it. There’s softer ways of going about it. But who would know? Who would know what’s going on in this country? And who would know that there’s anyone, …

You know, I believe that what we need most, i’ll finish on this. What we need most in this country is and in the world is White men need a return of heroism! We need heroism! We don’t have any heroism. The standard for heroism, heroism is so low that we’re considered in our, like, we’re not even getting shot at! But the standard for heroism for White men is so low, people aren’t even afraid of warfare and these very brutal concepts because they’re so detached. They’re worried about losing their job.

But the Taliban in Afghanistan, they’re not worried about losing their job. That doesn’t mean anything to them. They’re worried about getting killed by Russian soldiers or American soldiers or by some other, and I’m not just saying the Taliban, any, you know, group in the Middle East, for example, their standard for heroism is so much higher.

And I know we’re not at war, not yet, anyway. But it’s a spiritual war, and we need spiritual heroes. We need people that have the courage of their convictions and yeah, anyway, moving on!

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s also the power of calling ourselves Nazis, because we are getting a situation where we’ve created a situation where there are so many White Australians that don’t even really know anything about National Socialism or what this word “Nazi” really means. Apparently, it’s a bad thing! But they support us anyway.

People were saying that:

“No one’s going to support you because you call yourself Nazis, and it’s bad optics!”

And it’s well, all of these conservative types that we were supposed to appeal to, they’re starting to support us now anyway, and they’re rationalizing it by, like defending us from the charge of being Nazis or whatever. That’s the beauty of what we’re doing. Because it’s one thing trying to sit down and explain to someone:

“Hey, the Nazis weren’t the bad guys.”

I can hear Jacob has arrived. But it’s another thing to show that the Nazis are the good guys by being the good guys, actually, right now in 2024 Australia! And then that completely transforms the entire structure of political discourse, because if the Nazis are the good guys now, but this is apparently the worst possible thing that you can be, that turns everything on its head! That one move.

I’ll scooch over here for old man.

Jacob Hersant: Good evening, Klansmen!

Thomas Sewell: Hello.

Jacob Hersant: Hey, guys.

Thomas Sewell: Geez, we’re all in the black block tonight. What’s going on? Did we co-ordinate?

Joel Davis: We look good in black.

Jacob Hersant: Only feds can co-ordinate uniforms. [chuckling]

Thomas Sewell: Only feds can be fit. Why do we always show up? This is what I want to know.

Actually, I have two things. Now that Jacob’s here, I can joke around a bit, because with Joel, it’s always so serious. Joel can joke around, but I’m just saying it’s a different kind of mood. Jacob’s here. I can talk shit!

So, two things. One, why do we always show up whenever there’s legislation that needs passing? Do you work for the federal government, Jacob Hersant? Is that why you organised activism recently?

Jacob Hersant: They’ve always got an agenda. They always got new legislation to take away our freedoms.

Thomas Sewell: And then they sprayed us with just water, soapy water? And that’s how we were able to get those other shots later, because we weren’t actually pepper sprayed. This really happened.

Second thing that I want to go into is I made the mistake of watching Netflix recently, and my entire worldview has changed. I have to say, Jacob, I watched a movie. It had Liam Neeson in it. Its a new one.

And I thought to myself, I wonder how long I’m going to last watching this movie. It’s kind of like a standard Liam Neeson movie, like, Taken. But instead of rescuing his White daughter, he’s protecting and saving a little brown child, like a little Mexican. And after watching this masterful work of art, of not propaganda, but just pure art, pure apolitical art, I found that I had to challenge my own worldview.

[34:52]

And what I realised was we actually have more in common with brown people. We have so much in common with brown people. I found that there was actually two types of people. Because what this movie showed very clearly to me and educated me, was that us and brown people, we’re dealing with the same issues. We’re actually all on the same team. And really, the other, there’s us and there’s them, and there’s this divisive people that are trying to put borders between a fake us and them. Us and brown people. Really, us and brown people are the same. And the real us and theme is all the people that are trying to divide us. You see, that’s the real “them”. The “them” are the dividers! And the “us” is everyone that doesn’t want to be divided. And yeah, the US government, the cartels, basically are working together. And us and the brown people are like, viva la resistance, you know, we’re like the proletariat, the workers of the world that you need to unite and overthrow the evil cartels and the US government. What do you think about that, Jacob?

Jacob Hersant: It was just the truth! What can I add to the gospel? I don’t know! [chuckling] Yeah. I would just be humiliating myself, even trying to add footnotes to that.

Joel Davis: Well, I guess because God, like, he made the brown people brown and gave them all these different genetics, and then he gave us all these White genetics. And that was really unfair because that really divides us.

So we should really hail Satan now, I guess, [Tom laughing] because Satan is the ultimate unifier, like, trying to rebel against this asshole God that created this natural difference. Like, the idea that,

Thomas Sewell: Oh god!

Joel Davis: Like, women, like, can’t play chess as well as men. Like, what is that about? That’s really dividing us. Women must really hate that when they see it in the chess tournaments that they have to have a women’s only chess tournament, because that kind of implies something about their cognitive ability or, like these blacks like their average IQ was like 85 [American mixed blacks – African blacks, 70]. Like, why would God do that to them? Like, God is a fucking White supremacist! Like, he’s a fucking piece of shit Nazi. We got to kill him!

Thomas Sewell: Thoughts, Jacob?

Jacob Hersant: Well, I thought Joel Davis and your friend Nietzsche already killed God. We don’t have to do anything. But did you guys already talk about Fuck Off We’re Full?

Joel Davis: No, no. We held our balls until you arrived and ruined the whole beginning of the show where we’re just yapping.

Jacob Hersant: That’s all right.

Joel Davis: Everyone is here for that, and we didn’t even talk about it.

Anyway, here we go.

Thomas Sewell: We covered the article, “The revolution will not be publicized”, and our “reckless” behaviour. And how to properly do meta-political guerrilla warfare. I don’t know if you want to comment on that, Jacob.

Jacob Hersant: Am I a political gorilla? Yeah. I had someone concern trolling on one of the videos I put on Twitter. It was like, some brown woman who I think pretends is one of us.

Thomas Sewell: Margo Huss? [chuckling]

Jacob Hersant: I don’t know. Maybe it was her. I can’t remember her name, but she was concerned trolling, saying:

“How can you be a racist National Socialist if you accept Marxist socialism in the form of welfare payments?”

And then I just responded:

“I don’t think I’m going to lose any sleep over taking resources from the enemy and using it for my own cause. I’m a political guerrilla. I don’t care!”

It’d be like. [chuckling] It’d be like concern trolling when you’re on a battlefield and you take a spear of the enemy, and they’re like:

“Well, you’re using the enemy’s equipment! So actually, you’re relying on the enemy!”

It’s like:

“Okay, yeah, you convinced me. I won’t.”

Yeah, it’s just insanity!

But the amount of concern, trolling and retardation I get in the comments is insane! You think Twitter would probably be the worst because it’s a bit of a free for all, but the worst is actually Gab. Like the retardation I experienced on Gab it just takes the cake. So you think it’d just be an echo chamber of our guys. But there’s so many, there’s so many different people on there, it’s insane! Like, you even find Leftists on Gab. I don’t know what’s going on there, but it’s interesting.

Joel Davis: I thought it would be fun to go on like the Left-wing version of Gab and just be a Nazi on there. But the thing is, you’d get banned straight away. That’s the annoying thing about free speech. Like, I don’t really like giving Leftist free speech. Like, we really want to do it? Like that’s the we pro-free speech until we win, and then probably not anymore. And that’s the thing about all these rules. They’re like:

“Well, that’s not consistent!”

Like, if you want the enemy to respect your rules, you want the enemy to respect the kind of like fair play against you, then you should respect the fair play against them. But obviously the enemy doesn’t actually do that.

But like, in your example of taking like welfare payments from ZOG, it’s well, if ZOG’s dumb enough to give you money, you might as well take it.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, the free speech thing, I think, …

Joel Davis: A structure of rules that exist to defend. Yeah, that exists under the pretence of a liberal democracy that was created by White people for White people, where we could have a gentlemanly combat between the representatives of the working class and the representatives of the middle class. It’s like, yes, that can be a gentlemanly political conflict because ultimately we’re all still like White Christian Australians at that time or whatever. We’ve got so much more in common than we have that separates us.

[40:50]

But when you have like a system that has been totally hijacked by like communists and jews and all other kinds of parasites, corporate like subversion, and so on, it gets to the point where, well, why would you have any loyalty to that, like, structure anymore? Like, you might as well just play it and gamify it to maximize the amount of benefit that you can receive from it until you get into a position where you can overthrow it and instantiate a kind of order that enables you to completely, you know, wipe the slate clean and hit the reset button, which is the position that we need to go to now.

And I actually, I dealt with this guy, James Lindsay, who’s this American conservative. He’s a classical liberal, but he basically has found himself in Team conservative because he says the Left have gone woke with collectivism, and they’re not loyal to classical liberal principles. So now he’s, like, stuck on the Right-wing, but he’s constantly just complaining. Now he calls it the “Woke Right”, which is anyone on the Right-wing who wants to actually win, who wants to destroy the woke Left. It’s like:

“The woke Left is a problem, but you can’t destroy them. We have to give the woke Left all of these rights and just sit around and complain about the woke Left and what they’re doing.”

Apparently. But if we become the woke Right, we’re just as bad as them. It’s like when they say:

“Oh, this is just identity politics. Like, when, like, really what the Left-wing want is for White people to come together and practice identity politics because that’s the whole purpose is to divide us!”

And that kind of idea. It’s that same principle. And I said:

“So on one side, you have the woke Left that are trying to genocide the White race. On the other side, you have people like me, apparently, because I said a pro-National Socialist thing on Twitter. So that makes me woke Right?”

Apparently.

So I don’t want the White race to be genocided. I would rather seize power and destroy the people that are trying to genocide me. And I said:

“So what does that make you, James? You don’t like either of these sides. The woke Left, the woke Right. So what, are you just asleep? You just asleep in the middle?”

Thomas Sewell: Yes!

Joel Davis: He didn’t really have a response because this idea that, like, seizing power equals wokeness or something, and therefore it’s bad. It’s like, the problem with the enemy isn’t that they’re seizing power, it’s that they’re the enemy! Like, if we had power, it’d be awesome! Like, a dictatorship is awesome if it’s your guys that are running it! Only sucks if it’s your enemies that are running it! Like, ultimately, everything comes down to who’s wielding it. Like, guns are cool if the people who have them aren’t trying to shoot you with them. They only become a problem when they get pointed in your face. And their ideology is like:

“But no one should have guns, so then no one can point them at anyone’s faces.”

And then it’s like:

“Okay, so you’ve put your gun, you’ve left your gun at home, and then the enemy rocks up with guns. And now what the fuck are we gonna do?”

Well, if I go and get a gun and shoot back at them, apparently I’m just as bad as them. [chuckling] It’s fucking retarded! This is the mentality of conservatives and liberals, like, classic liberals.

Thomas Sewell: They can’t extrapolate the most basic self defense principles into the political theatre. But you’re regarding freedom of speech, before we go on to the rally. Yeah. It’s important to identify the enemy. There’s always an enemy. You have to identify it.

And then you can have freedom of speech for the citizens. You can have freedom of speech for the members of the fog, because they’re not the enemy.

Now, the only caveat you have to have to that, otherwise the same exact situation is going to happen again, is how do you deal with traitors?

So once you’ve removed the enemy from the equation, there’s not like a foreign interference trying to disrupt your society and use your freedom of speech against you still are going to have these kind of bio-Leninists. You’re going to have these biological traitors that just spawn every now and then.

And the more unsettling your environment is, the more horrible your social environment is as a country, as a nation, the more common these people are going to spawn, which is in itself an autoimmune function, or a cancer, an anti-autoimmune function. It’s like an autoimmune disease of the nation. And so freedom of speech in itself helps expose this problem that you then have to solve, which is a biological issue related to its environment.

So freedom of speech, I like freedom of speech, but, yeah, you just don’t give it to your enemy. So it’s just about how do you legislate that? How do you write that into a constitutional wording that doesn’t kind of violate its own principle, but protects the nation with longevity. That’s difficult. That’s probably the hard part.

Joel Davis: Well, you just get rid of all the enemies from the territory, and then you everyone free speech, because there’s no enemies left.

Thomas Sewell: But you still have traitors, you still have people spawn.

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

Thomas Sewell: The eternal jew, kind of, even when there’s no jews in the society, there’s still like Purple [word unclear] or whatever the fuck his name is.

[45:39]

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So, like the, …

Thomas Sewell: Like the bio Leninists,

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

Thomas Sewell: So that’s what I was saying. Yeah, I don’t want to get too deep into it because I can see Jacob’s, like, wandering off. He’s like:

“Just Fed post in [word unclear]. Get them all!”

Joel Davis: Let’s pull up the Nine News. I mean, Seven News covered it, but I like the Nine News coverage better, so I’m going to play the Nine News coverage of the rally.

Nine News: Neo-Nazi thugs who gate crashed a peaceful pro-refugee rally in Docklands have been pepper sprayed during a violent confrontation with police. No arrests were made, but investigators are working to identify members of the far-Right group. Gillian Lantouris reports.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) A peaceful protest met with hate. Tensions reached boiling point as neo-Nazis clash with a refugee rally. Police, forced to use their batons and pepper spray, chased away from Burke street in Docklands. The far-Right group continued spreading their hostility nearby.

NSN: Are we ever gonna see your race again? No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Refugee protesters were marking 100 days and nights of camping outside the Department of Home affairs office, calling for permanent visas for eight and a half thousand people, when they were ambushed around six last night.

Aran Mylvaganam: (Refugee Encampment Organiser) Saying things like, “Hail victory, White power, Australia for White men.” These sort of chants shouldn’t be allowed.

Joel Davis: Wait. I just want to try and say his name. What is his name?

Thomas Sewell: Malvaganum.

Joel Davis: No, no. This guy. Aaran Malvaganum. Milvagenum?

Jacob Hersant: John Gangnam! [chuckling]

Joel Davis: The cunt that’s telling us what we shouldn’t be. We shouldn’t be allowed to say in our own fucking country! Look at this cunt anyway.

Aran Mylvaganam: These sort of chance shouldn’t be allowed.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Many attendees, like Rathy Barthlote, have fled war torn countries seeking safety in Melbourne.

Jacob Hersant: Check the smile. Coming up.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Greens MP Samantha Ratnam was there.

Samantha Ratnam: (Greens MP) It’s frightening and it’s devastating to see these racists so emboldened that they feel like they can come and attack a peaceful rally.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Politicians from all sides united condemning the behaviour!

Jacinta Allan: (Vic Premier) Disgraceful cowards! They hide behind masks and they absolutely do not represent any single part of this great state!

Peter Dutton: (MP, Leader of the Opposition, Liberal Party) I hope the police can take appropriate action.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) So there’s calls for harsher penalties.

Jacinta Allan: (Vic Premier) We have strengthened powers on these matters and we’re looking at what more we can do to strengthen our anti-vilification framework.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) No arrests have been made, but police will be reviewing security footage in the hopes they can identify the individuals involved and hold them to account.

Samantha Ratnam: (Greens MP) The government must take this threat seriously. We can’t just rely on the police to keep us safe.

Nine News: Meanwhile, a high profile, …

Joel Davis: Anyway. Yeah, the coverage was awesome! The crying brown lady like, I really don’t think that that’s going to play well with Right-wing Australians. I think Right-wing Australians will look at that and think this is just so egregious propaganda. Like, these browns, we already drew attention to this before, but they’re just literally not even Australians! And they’re demanding that they just have the right to be in our country, just because!

Thomas Sewell: The second half of that film clip of that news clip, is that where it ends? Is I think, he’s a Palestinian. And he got caught doing the swastika at a rally.

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah!

Thomas Sewell: And it was a horrible segment. It’s a bit off topic from the rally, but did you watch that new segment? You should put it up later.

It said his wife was his business partner. She’s left him because he did this swastika Israeli flag. And then she did an interview with the media saying that she’s, like, really going to focus on rebuilding the restaurant. She full like, boss wifedom. And she’s like, she’s divorced him, so that she can secure the bag, because the restaurant was going under because it was getting boycotted. And she’s like, she threw her husband and business partner, like, who’s the same person under the table and denounced him!

And I think he’s a Palestinian that was trying to make the point that Israel are the new Nazis and put the swastika up. Crazy!

Joel Davis: Probably won’t even get in any trouble for it, because the law seems already, …

Thomas Sewell: He’s already pled guilty. Nah, he’s already pled guilty.

Jacob Hersant: He pled guilty.

Joel Davis: What an idiot! He could afford that.

Jacob Hersant: What did he display, a swastika? What was it specifically?

Thomas Sewell: I think Nickel had the full, …

Joel Davis: It was like an Israeli flag, but instead of the Star of David in the middle, had a swastika in the middle.

Jacob Hersant: Okay. Yeah. That’s crazy!

Joel Davis: Yeah. But anyway. What? I mean. Lol.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah go back to the rally.

Joel Davis: But no, the coverage. I mean, they get the police, they’re gonna try and identify who was there. Well, I was fucking there! I mean, my face is out. I haven’t got any calls from the cops, haven’t come around to the house. So, like, obviously, they’re not gonna do shit! There’s just some platitude that they say. Because we didn’t commit any crimes. They committed crimes against us! They literally pepper sprayed us for no fucking reason! Like, we were just standing there. So that was definitely, like, excessive force.

And the reason why they pepper sprayed us, in my opinion, was because a lot of those police officers were women. And they just freaked out and didn’t know what to do.

And so, you know, they’ve done studies on this. Like, women are way more trigger happy. Women shouldn’t be fucking cops! Like, it’s particularly crowd control of all the fucking jobs that you could give them. Absolutely insane!

But anyway, getting pepper sprayed in the face was pretty fun. I enjoyed that. The clip of you, like:

“What are you gonna fucking do?”

[chuckling]

Jacob Hersant: Like, [loud laughing] hands to my side:

“What are you gonna fucking do!”

[52:07]

Joel Davis: And also my objective for this rally was very simple. I wanted to get, because we came up with the idea in the group chat with the boys of, so this might be Americans and stuff that don’t know about this. You can go on my Telegram and see what the song is because I posted it for the benefit of foreigners to understand the reference. But there’s this classic Aussie pub rock song by a band called The Angels called “Am I ever gonna see your face again?” And they were playing it in the pub scene in the eighties, and eventually some drunk cunt decided to scream out in response to the chorus of, “Am I ever gonna see your face again?”, “No way! Get fucked, fuck off!”.

And then the rest of the crowd started chanting it and it became ubiquitous all over Australia. To the point that whenever they do live gigs, the whole crowd does it. And the front man even has a shirt that says, “No way, get fucked! Fuck off!”, on it. Cause they’ve totally embraced it. And this is like a classic Aussie meme that’s been around since the eighties.

And when I was growing up, I remember, like, my parents, like, red pilling me on the “No way, get fucked, fuck off!”, as a young boy, like:

“You gotta, like, everyone sings that at this point of the song!”

It’s like this, like ancient Australian meme, basically.

And then we had the idea of changing the lyrics to “Am I ever going to see your race again?” Instead of face again? Because the whole point of that rally, because we confronted it a few months ago. We did the “Fuck Off, We’re Full”, 1.0. This was “Fuck Off, We’re Full” 2.0. And 1.0 was when they just started getting established and we wanted to go down and draw attention to it and tell them to fuck off, basically. Get out of our country. And that was hilarious! We had a good time with that.

But they’ve been out there like, ever since. They have literally been camping there. They had charities bringing them, like, free food tents and everything. And they’ve just been, like, doing their inane chants and their broken English, just harassing pedestrians. And they’ve been doing it all over the country, by the way, not just in Melbourne.

And eventually, finally, like a week or two ago, Vic Pol [Victorian Police] was sent down by the council to clean all of their shit out and move them on, finally, because they were just annoying everyone. A few of them have actually got notices to get deported. We infiltrated a Left-wing group chat and found that out. So that’s quite funny.

So hopefully they all get deported. I’m sure a lot of them will have jewish NGO’s and communist NGO’s, like, with human rights, quote, unquote, “lawyers” that’ll try and keep them in the country, and it’ll become a protracted drama.

But the point is that this was like their kind of closing rally where they’re closing down the encampment and giving up, basically.

So we wanted to go down and mogg them to say, like:

“We fucking won! Like, fuck you! Like, you lost. You didn’t get your permanent visas now or whatever, you fucking brown dogs!”

And so the “No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!”, was a beautiful sentiment that we wanted to communicate. I wanted that to go on the news because there’s so many, maybe the Zoomers won’t get it. Some of them will if they are in touch with the culture of their parents. But old Millennials and Gen-X’s will fucking froth that! They’ll love that! And because [chuckling] it’s the kind of Aussie ingenuity to take that song. And that’s part of the beauty of using the “Fuck Off, We’re Full” banner, which is also like an ancient Australian proverb, that’s like a bumper sticker from the eighties and the nineties that every racist would slap on the back of their car like a picture of Australia with an Australian flag that said, “Fuck Off, We’re Full”. You’d slap it on the back of the ute to indicate that you’re just sick of immigrants.

So we were channeling some Australiana. Like, we were channeling the culture of Australia when it was still fucking White! When White Australia was still dominant and taken for granted by itself. And we were the monoculture. And we were trying to create that nostalgia, you know, particularly in somewhat the older generation of:

“Remember when everyone was White? Remember when there was no Indians at Coles. When you go to Coles and everyone was White, remember when everyone was pleasant? Remember when there weren’t, like, gangs of fucking criminal negroes, you know, stabbing children and shit? Remember what that was like. Remember what it was like to actually have a fucking country?”

We remember. Here you go!

So some of us don’t remember. Some of us are too young to remember, actually. I remember small snippets of it. That was just the very beginning of my life where it still felt like that, but it was ripped away from me almost immediately. And everyone younger than like, people who are, like, 30 have that faint memory. People who are 20 some of the boys in the organisation were 20. They have no memory of what that was like. They were born into multiculturalism. Full spectrum multiculturalism.

But anyway, I think we successfully pulled off the troll, and Jacob had to jump on the megaphone at the end because the pepper spray was getting too much. I’d snot pouring out my nose. I was just no longer in a state to be running the megaphone. Had a whole speech planned, and that got kind of ruined. But I didn’t keel over like a bitch and get some photo snapped by a communist that was spread all over the Internet of me being a pussy. So I’ll take that as a win.

[57:20]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, you didn’t get sprayed full on. You had the glasses on.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Jacob Hersant: If you didn’t have glasses, you would have been fucked! [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Jacob Hersant: Because if you see in the footage, the close up footage of some of the boys, they got that they got their mask ripped off and their glasses ripped off just before getting sprayed. They were going for it. Like, the police were going for maximum damage with the spray. And I don’t think they only had just pepper spray. I think they had the what is it? There’s, like, more chemical one and then there’s the, …

Thomas Sewell: They have the spray and they have the foam. So they were using both. One’s in a big can with a like, a trigger and one’s in a little spray bottle.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. How many people did we have incapacitated? Probably four people. Five or four?

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, four.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

Joel Davis: By the end, I couldn’t see. [chuckling]

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Yes.

Jacob Hersant: We took about two minutes to just regroup, and then we just marched straight back in it. People that could barely see! [chuckling]

Thomas Sewell: We had all the blind in the middle just getting huddled in just stick together.

Joel Davis: I could still chant. I was still yelling, fuck off! Yeah. Like, “No way! Get fucked! Fuck Off” and shit! Yeah, I had the Sunnies on, so you couldn’t see my eyes all closed up and, …

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it was funny because when we were preparing for it, one of the guys said, I told everyone to bring goggles, and they know what type of goggles to bring. And then one guy was like:

“What are we bringing the goggles for?”

And I was like:

“You’ll see. You’ll see!”

Because the police report, …

Joel Davis: Like, I know my glasses are so cool! I chose optics over safety!

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I got a tiny bit. I got hit by a tiny bit. And because I had the goggles on it couldn’t really get in, the foam, it was pretty good. There’s a foam under the goggle, and it couldn’t seep into my eyes. But last time I got pepper sprayed was at the Stop Immigration, and they did the same thing. While we’re in the kind of the melee, while they’re trying to push and shove us around, there were cops reaching over and pulling people’s glasses down and then spraying them in the eyes. I didn’t get the full foam like that OC foam that they were using, but I got the little spray the little handheld spray, and because I got the big can and they got the little can, I got hit by the little one just directly in the eyes. And I was incapacitated for probably ten minutes. But that other stuff, I mean, that knocked guys out for almost, 20 hours. That was crazy! The big stuff. The big foam stuff.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I got hit with it, but I didn’t get any of it in my eyes, but I, like, my nostrils were burning and it just tasted like I ate some chili. Like, I could feel it on my breath and on my nose, but, like, nothing in my eyes, so I was just, I was loving it. So I’m just like, fuck it! I’m taking the megaphone. Let’s go!

Joel Davis: I kind of turned my head, but the foam went in on one side, so I was like:

“Okay, I guess I’m one eye down. I can do it with one eye.”

But then through, I guess, sweat and just everything moving around, eventually it made its way across to the other eye, and then I was fucked!

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I was right next to you weren’t even. You weren’t in the middle. You’re next to me on the flank. And then when we’re getting sprayed. And I was already like facing the wrong way.

But then I looked back and that’s when they started spraying. I was like:

“Oh, no!”

I stayed away luckily, but I just got, I got a bunch of my mask, but not in the eyes. The goggles did the job.

Joel Davis: I was really proud of the boys that we marched around the corner staunch because we were actually, originally, we were marching through this park and then as we started marching I look ahead and I can see that the cops are basically waiting for us.

And I thought we can give them the slip down this alleyway and go up the other street and we can get to the confrontation with the refugees and the commies before the cops have to regroup.

And so we went up the side street and the refugees came and met us. There was that one spastic that was like as if he was like an archer or something with his like keys in his hand. But he didn’t do anything. He was just a retard!

Thomas Sewell: It was just a traditional Palestinian boxing stance.

[1:01:37]

Joel Davis: It was like, it was like some weird like karate shit that he was trying to channel. But I was just like, you’re a dickhead. What are you doing?

Jacob Hersant: That’s what the Leftists do.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, under Australian law you could have just fucking punched him. But it would have, the damage, …

You would have won it in court because what he did was assault. You can’t just like shape up to someone that’s just walking down the street even if they have a different political opinion.

And that’s something that I think Jacob covered last stream.

Joel Davis: Like go through the law and like when you can and can’t, like deploy the fists because, anyway, …

Thomas Sewell: He was putting keys in your face. I mean, at that point I think you’d be okay. But you made the right choice to just sort of like parry them off and then like the rest of us caught up and then as soon as, like, yeah, as soon as everyone was there, the guy kind of backed off. And then he was the main guy after that point that was pretending to kind of like try to break up the two groups or not break them up. But I don’t know if he saws I kept my eye on him because I saw what he did at the start and I was like:

“Okay, this guy’s gonna try and get up to no good.”

Joel Davis: Most went to the cops when they showed up because that was a more direct concern. Yeah, the cop came up to me and was like:

“You guys, you’re disturbing the piece. You’ve got five minutes to get out of here before you get arrested.”

Oh, no! He said five minutes first, and then 10 seconds later, it became two minutes.

So then we did a few chants, and then I was like:

“All right, let’s have a bit of a quick, like, powwow as to what’s the strategy here?”

And then me, as I walk over to discuss it, they just bum rush us immediately to start spraying everyone.

So, yeah, maybe it was the wrong decision to try and think that I had time to, like hold a committee meeting in that situation. [chuckling] It was too chill. Should have been more just on the front foot.

But anyway, it wouldn’t have made a difference.

Thomas Sewell: We were reactive. It worked well. Like, even when they were pepper spraying us, there was two young guys that got a little bit freaked out at the back. But I just went straight to the back and just kind of hold, held the formation. I was like, stay in line, cunts! [chuckling] I was like, full Triarii at the back. It was funny.

Joel Davis: But we ended up going back around through to the park and the Leftist had a chance to come at us. Because the communists are trying to say that they ran us out, but they had an opportunity when we first showed up.

And also when we got to the park, we got to the park, there was like one cop there who was like, you could see him freaking out, like:

“Fuck, fuck, fuck! What do we do?”

And the communists came. And then they stood like 5 meters away from us and just mouthed off. And I, they didn’t have the balls to come step to us in either of those situations. Apparently they punched Nazis. Apparently. Community defense. They don’t need the cops. You know:

“The community will run the Nazis out or whatever!”

They’re full of shit! They’re all a bunch of pussies!

Jacob Hersant: How good was The Noticer of footage with the woman? She’s like standing there still:

“Stay back, Nazi scum! Stay back, Nazi scum!”

Thomas Sewell: Was that the one with the tambourine?

Joel Davis: I can play some of this footage. I think that people would like to see it. Let me. Yeah.

So this is some of The Noticer footage, the official Noticer dot News coverage of, I guess, spliced together from different cameras, shit that got uploaded online.

[Video of the demo with shouts and screaming]

Jacob Hersant: The Indians are so funny. Look at that chad!

[Cops spraying them with pepper and other]

They love the spray! The women cops love the spray.

Look at, … What are these women cops doing?

What are we saying Tom?

Thomas Sewell: What were the women cops? Do you see that? Just go back a little bit. Just a smidge. It’s like half the cops are up at the line and then the other half are kind of like holding onto each other’s belts. But they’re like 20 meters behind.

Joel Davis: Here.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, around here. Press play. Yeah.

Joel Davis: What are they doing?

Thomas Sewell: What are they doing? Feminine [word unclear] now. She’s got a taser out.

[NSN guys chanting slogans]

Jacob Hersant: Anyway.

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s basically it.

Jacob Hersant: That’s what Leftists call chasing us off, like just us leaving in an orderly manner.

Joel Davis: What are we gonna do, stand there for 2 hours?

Jacob Hersant: And get arrested? Like they’ll just wait for more police to show up and then they’ll kettle us and arrest us for some reason. Whether it be, …

Joel Davis: Also I don’t want to stand there for 2 hours just screaming the same, like chant over and over again!

Anyway, we made our point, like what are we going to do? They make out this idea that because they’re willing to stay there all night because they’ve got nothing better to do, like that somehow it’s a win for them. It’s like it’s not a win for you. [chuckling] The only reason anyone gives a fuck about this is because we came and paid you a visit.

[1:08:46]

Jacob Hersant: They don’t think strategically, like we’ve got a goal, a strategic goal. We go there, we achieve it, we’re done. Let’s get out of there before we waste any more resources, whether it be getting arrested or just all of our time.

Thomas Sewell: They don’t have to worry about that because they only get arrested by the police when they explicitly use violence against the police. Like if the rules were the same, we would never get pepper sprayed, we would never get attacked or have anything stolen by the police. We would have to do Leftist tactics with the Left when they’re in big enough numbers. They just like mob the police and then the police actually go:

“Oh no. Now you’re going too far!”

And the Leftoids on Twitter and just in general always sook, like:

“How come they arrest all these people on the Left but never like us, like the evil Nazis?”

Like because we don’t attack the police! Like it’s just stupid! Like you can win the battle. Sure. Like, it was mostly female cops. We could have smashed them.

But what’s the point? Like then the SWAT team comes to your house the next day, like all the leading members, all the, like it’s just fucking retarde Like what’s the point?

Whereas the Left, they’ll do that and then they just get bailed. And then, you know, they’ve got all these jewish, you know, human rights lawyers that just represent them. And then they get let off because it’s just a “legitimate protest”. Or they get a little bit of jail. Like, sometimes they get like a month in jail.

If one of us hit a cop, you’d get like two years. I reckon you’d get like one to two years for hitting a cop. As a Right-winger. As a Leftist, …

Jacob Hersant: Even with no criminal history, you’ll still get a year or two.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you probably get one or two years for hitting a cop. I was just looking up, because that cop that was tearing the masks off, we actually found out who he is. And I’m just looking at the Crimes Act 1958, Section 31 D. Intimidation of a law enforcement officer or family member. Because I’m working how to dox him because the doxing laws haven’t come into effect yet. But you have to do it in a way that it can’t be construed as, like, harassment of his family. Because he’s an idiot! Like this guy that was walking around trying to tear the masks off our guys, which is unlawful. You can’t do that’s assault. You can’t just walk up to someone and grab their face.

So we’re obviously going to have to follow up this with some more legal action. Not that it’s been very successful so far because the system is so corrupt. When we report the police for their criminal activities, like openly criminal activities, so far we’ve had one case going through pretty well, but the other cases are the Ombudsman just wrote back to me when I had my phone stolen by that cop, the Ombudsman said:

“Oh, we wouldn’t use those words to describe what happened.”

It’s like, it’s not theft? So I can just do that to people in the street, like. Anyway, crazy stuff!

But yeah, this guy, he’s got all his social media, like his family, like his wedding photos. We’ve got it all downloaded. We’ve got it all saved. Just working out how to legally post it all in a way that’s just maybe for comic purposes. I don’t know. We’ll work it out. He’s a fucking arsehole! Want to dox our boys, and then you’ve got, like, your missus and all your family and the house you bought all on social media. Fucking idiot!

Joel Davis: Yeah, he was a scumbag. And for some reason, the undercover cops were bigger assholes than the regular cops.

Thomas Sewell: Because they were detectives. I’m pretty sure they were CT detectives.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

Thomas Sewell: They just got a fucking pole up there arse! They think they can just behave however they want. They’re like the Stasi*, you know.

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. That woman was particularly violent as well. That was a man and a woman. Both of them were very violent, for no reason. I thought when we were first getting pushed, they were just going to do the regular move on, which is obviously they just push while shouting “move”. But they went straight to pepper spraying. Yeah, they were very aggressive that day.

Joel Davis: But the fact that if there were CT detectives, they were probably in a command structure where Counter-Terrorism was issuing commands, they must have figured out or got wind that we were going to show up. And that probably explains, because when we did it the first time, there was not that many police there. And the police looked genuinely shocked and unprepared, and they just basically had to accept the fact that we were there and they didn’t aggress against us in any way. And they were very calm. Because I led the first rally as well. So they conferred with me as the non-masked person, and they were very calm and relatively reasonable to talk to that was not the case this time. So why would they behave differently unless they had maybe an inkling that we were coming?

Thomas Sewell: They would have had an inkling. I think if they knew for a fact we were coming, they would have had way more cops. But they were stretched so thin because there was that nigger concert on at the same time.

[1:13:44]

Joel Davis: I think they might have had an idea that we’re going to do something, but they didn’t know what. And they probably guessed that that was one of the possible things we would do.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but also, it was the hundredth day anniversary of their fucking stink camp. And they would have assumed that because they’ve been demanding more police presence because some drunk, like, Aussies, like, threatened them as well. Like just randoms. So there would have been a lot more cops there. I think we caught them off guard, mostly. Those two, I don’t know if they’re CT detectives, but 100% they were detectives, but they were definitely from a more political command structure. What they were doing was they were trying to tear masks off. And then there was the protest. There’s like an Asian dude, Asian cop, who’s like, it’s his primary role to be on like a high quality digital camera that films all the protests. He’s at every single protest I’ve ever been at. It’s this like kind of stocky Asian cop. And he was basically trying to get an angle on us.

And then when the detectives were running around and aggressively pushing and shoving people in our ranks and trying to rip the masks down, he was trying to get an angle to try to get the faces. So it was kind of like a fishing operation. Both of them were working in unison.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. And the Leftists, they had two opportunities to attack us if they wanted to, as in start a melee, but they never take it. They always are just obsessed with gesticulating and pretending they’re fighting and they’re ready to fight. Like on the flank I was on where I was yelling, “what are you gonna fucking do?”, there was like this old Boomer with a flag, a CFMEU flag. Well, that was like full twirling it. Like, twirling it, like some sort of staff. You know, he’s got like a staff. He’s like a martial arts, …

Thomas Sewell: He was larping, he was larping.

Jacob Hersant: He was having fun, I’ll say that!

And obviously the guy with the makeshift key, knuckle dusters, like, they all shape up and they pretend they’re ready to fight. But there was no police at that point when we first made contact with the communists.

And at the same time, when we came around the second time around the street after being pepper sprayed, you can just see them all standing there going:

“Stay back, Nazi scum!”

They [chuckling] never do anything, but they, …

Joel Davis: There was one little dude having a soy rage that when we came right into the park and he must be like, I don’t know, five foot three, he’s a little, and he has the typical soy-jack physiognomy. And he was yelling out:

“Incels! You, incels!”

Like, with the most soy voice you’ve ever fucking heard! I’m like:

“Tell it to your fucking wife’s boyfriend, faggot!”

Like, he was like:

“Incels! Incels!”

Like, and then we just walk past and he’s:

“You weak little pussy incels!”

Joel Davis: And we just like, walk past and he’s just like, shivering!

Thomas Sewell: I’ve only had one Leftoid try to throw a punch at me since getting out of jail. And that was at the Stop Immigration rally, the one where we first met you, Joel, but you rocked up late. Like, you came afterwards, and we were marching off.

Joel Davis: I rocked up one time, but you guys had already been fucking pepper sprayed before the time. [laughing]

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah, that’s right. That’s a good point. Yeah, because we got there so early. Yeah. So well, you rocked up after is probably the correct term. But, yeah, as we got moved on, we got a move on order, we had to leave. So as we were leaving, that’s when they started throwing shit at us. And I remember, like, something fucking big hit me in the knee, and then another thing hit me in the chest, and then there was a little bit of a melee that almost started.

And then this one guy, when we’re in the line, I remember he, like, came at and just did the most, like, ridiculous, like, haymaker, like, telegraphed, punched, and I kind of just leaned back and I had the megaphone in my hand, and I just booked him in the head with the megaphone. [chuckling] And he was like, it was really funny! It was completely comical! It was completely comical. He just did the biggest telegraph, haymaker.

And I was like:

“Oh, I’m gonna pull that one!”

And then just, boop with the megaphone.

It was like ACME* productions. And he didn’t come in for another punch after he got smacked in the head with the megaphone. I think that’s why the first megaphone is broken.

[* The ACME Corporation is a fictional corporation that features prominently in the Road Runner/Wile E. Coyote animated shorts as a running gag. The company manufactures outlandish products that fail or backfire catastrophically at the worst possible times. The name is also used as a generic title in many cartoons, especially those made by Warner Bros. And films, TV series, commercials and comic strips.]

Joel Davis: I’d rather cop a megaphone than a fist, to be honest. Megaphone is not that hard.

Thomas Sewell: I don’t know. It’s pretty sharp. Like, all the weight of the punch is just kind on the edge of the megaphone.

Joel Davis: I’ll keep that in mind!

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, use the megaphone. The megaphone’s a good distancing weapon, you know?

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

Jacob Hersant: They were gesticulating and they weren’t actually ready for a fight.

But then when the police attacked us, that’s when they were all cheering and jeering for it. They were all celebrating it, and they were following behind the cops going:

“Fuck you, Nazis! Yeah!”

[1:18:37]

Thomas Sewell: :

“We did it! Yeah! We did it!”

Jacob Hersant: Free advice for any political movement is just not to do that. It just makes you look really, really bad! [chuckling]

Joel Davis: Particularly when you call yourself Anarcho-Communists. You were like:

“The police are all Nazis!”

And they were coming out on Twitter saying things like:

“Oh, it’s so good to see Nazis pepper spraying other Nazis!”

Or something. It’s such cope. Like, it’s insane cope! But I don’t want to fucus on the Leftists too much because I mean, they’re really irrelevant. What’s relevant is us. Like, we’re the main story. The only time they can ever get themselves on the news is if they hitch their wagon to like the pro-Palestinian thing or something. But none of their actual issues of substance are relevant to Australians. Like, average Australians don’t give a shit about what communists have to say about almost anything, but they are interested in what we have to say, for better or worse.

And I thought we made an excellent point, which is that, well, fuck off, we’re full!

But moreover the average Australian doesn’t sympathize with these fucking pajeet refugees! The entitlement is outrageous, absolutely outrageous! These people can barely speak English. They look fresh off the boat. They stunk! The average Australian does not want these people in our country. And like, some of them are from India. How the fuck are you a refugee from India?

And now the government is changing the laws. So if you claim that you’re a victim of domestic violence, you can claim refugee status. So what? The jeets come over here, bash the missus, the missus goes and complains, and now they all get to stay? That’s literally the law now. Or some of them, the guy will say that they’re a homosexual and they can’t be deported because they’ll get persecuted back in fucking Sri Lanka or wherever the fuck they’re from.

So they let him stay and then he then goes and brings the wife and kids over! Like, oh yeah, you’re a real homosexual! That’s why you got a wife and kid!

Thomas Sewell: And then he beats her and then the wife and kids get a stay. [laughing]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. [laughing]

Thomas Sewell: I mean, he’s a homosexual, misogynist, Muslim refugee. Yeah, pajeet refugee.

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s insane!

But a lot of people respected what we did, and I saw a lot of responses from, I want to go through actually some of these TikTok responses because some of them are actually quite good. Let me pull this up. I want to read some of them out to you.

So there was a clip uploaded to TikTok of part of the rally, I think, when we were singing the, “We never want to see your race again. No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!” And the comments are quite good. People saying:

“Finally, someone standing up for Australia. Love the sign!”

With those emojis that have the love hearts all over them:

“Love Aussies. Straight to the point!”

“Stay strong, fellas. Nice work!”

“At least someone is standing up for Australia properly. Well done. The government needed to study this and grow a set and make it happen for the voters!”

And this has 400 likes in the TikTok comment section:

“Good on you boys from Gazza!”

Gazza is like this Boomer with a huge White beard:

“Good on your boys!”

And 600 likes. We’re getting these sympathetic, like, patriotic Boomer types and, like moms, dads just average everyday Aussies that are just starting to love us because we keep hitting issues that they actually care about in ways that are obviously sympathetic. Like, we keep taking positions the average Aussie battler is on our side in that position, and then we just ram it down the throat of the system with our intensity.

And then they have to go and cry about:

“The Nazis. Someone put them in jail! Why aren’t the police arresting them?”

And apparently we’ve done the most heinous crime and:

“We don’t deserve to exist. We’re just total scum! We’re basically terrorists. And it’s just crazy that we’re getting away with it!”

Or something, apparently, just for holding a sign and marching around and saying slogans.

And we’re just kind of drawing through ju-jitsu the media and the government into a promotional campaign of just free promotion. Everyone fucking hates the media! Everyone hates the government and we’re just using them to promote us. And everyone who hates them who realises that they’re fucking anti-White, who realises that they don’t give a shit that the media and the establishment don’t give a shit about them and are working against them. Well, if they attacking us constantly and we’re constantly taking positions they agree with, they’re going to start loving us and they’re turning us into a relevant political force in Australia.

And I’ve said this many times before, if they just shut the fuck up and none of these politicians and none of these journalists had anything to say about us and they didn’t talk about us on the news we would be irrelevant, and it would be very difficult for us to grow in numbers and we would be unhappy. Like, we would actually be sad. Like, we love every time they do a hit piece on us.

And then that’s stupid that they keep giving us what we want. And then you’ll see some people in the comments:

“They’re just attention seekers. Why are you giving them attention? Like, this is what they want!”

And, yeah, it is what we want. Like, we’re doing publicity stunts. And they’re stupid enough to play along with it. Its hilarious!

Jacob Hersant: At the same time, they get something out of it, because we’re actually interesting.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

[1:23:59]

Jacob Hersant: Like, the refugee closing rally only became interesting because we showed up in black and made chants and sung songs. Like, otherwise it’s just boring. And they bring out the jeets that are complaining about us and they can barely string a sentence together:

“And they were here saying, Australia for White man!”

And it’s just boring and it’s embarrassing, and it would be completely irrelevant and uninteresting if it wasn’t in response to the black battalion showing up [chuckling] and having fun.

One thing I saw on the video that I posted about it, I saw someone concern trolling, and he’s saying:

“This is the optics grey area, where you want to appear peaceful, but you don’t, like, at the same time you’re getting attacked by the police, so you have to respond. It’s hard for you to decide.”

But I don’t think that. I think that’s more just kind of just an unreasonable complaint, or a bit of concern trolling, because the reality is no one expects you when some overzealous cop attacks your activists, no one expects you to pull out a gun and just dome them right there or something like that’s just insane!

Joel Davis: There’s the American retard. That was like:

“Oh, you Aussies. Like, this is what you deserve because you gave up your guns!”

I was like:

“So what? Like, we have gun rights and when the police attack us and we just pull out guns and have a shootout with the cops, like, that’s going to go down well. Like, let’s say we merc every cop, then what happens?”

Then they’re going to come and try and arrest us or what? We just constantly go to war with the police? And we just kill every police officer in the whole country?

Thomas Sewell: True Ned Kelly!

Joel Davis: Why haven’t you done that yet?

Jacob Hersant: Well, they expect us to do everything.

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

Jacob Hersant: They want us to be the Kelly gang at war with the cops. But people don’t even see it that way. Like the public looks. People expect that you have a right to protest because they think we live in a democracy.

So we don’t necessarily have to behave super well, but we know practically we have to behave super well, but we can act a little bit silly and the public wouldn’t really care because they’re just like:

“You’re protesters.”

But it’s the police that actually are expected to behave fairly and to give everyone a fair go. They’re there to police the situation. And when they attack you, it makes them look bad. And if you’re disciplined, you looked good. There’s no issue with that. Like no one in the public is expecting you to pull out a knife and start stabbing police officers because they try to unmask you or something.

Joel Davis: That would make us look bad. Like, if we were that reckless, people would think that we would just nut jobs and they wouldn’t take us seriously. So that actually would work against us. And if we’re all getting thrown in prison, how are we going to lead a political movement? So that doesn’t make any sense on that ground.

But also we handle ourselves with dignity. There’s no images of us looking like, keeled over, looking like bitches. Like we stood up, we stood to the police, like, we stood direct to them. We didn’t, we didn’t bitch out. Yeah, they sprayed pepper spray all over us. So we kind of retreated and then went to another position, reset up and did our rally anyway. I think that showed grit and determination, but also, like, reasonableness. Like, in that situation, what else are we supposed to do? And some people are like:

“Well, you should have anticipated that that was going to happen.”

And it’s well, look at all the rallies that we’ve done this year. The last few rallies. Like when we did the “Fuck Off! We’re Full!” rally the first time or the Corowa rally, we just mogged. Like the police, we caught them out in those situations or in situations where they couldn’t do anything about it. And so that’s great!

Obviously, we would love to have a rally where the police are just don’t have the capability, the raw manpower, because we, through sheer tactics, we just outnumber them to such a degree that they have to accept our presence. But we’re not going to be able to have that situation every time. We can try and do our best to strategize around our rallies to avoid negative confrontations, but it’s going to happen sometimes.

Thomas Sewell: That was a counter-protest. It was a counter-protest. The whole point was to have a politically charged confrontation. That’s the whole point of a counter-protest.

So, yeah, I don’t, …

Joel Davis: I remember “Fuck Off! We’re Full!”, the first time, I was thinking in my head, like:

“I’m probably gonna be in jail tonight.”

And I just went just accepting that. And then it just worked out great. And I was:

“Oh, well, I guess that was fine.”

Thomas Sewell: You know how the Lefties do their protests on the bridge? Like they’ll block the bridge and they’ll like chain themselves to a car and shit! Like they’ll do, …

Joel Davis: Like climate protestors, …

Thomas Sewell: Could you imagine if the police just rocked up with just the OC spray and just started spraying them?

Joel Davis: That would be awesome!

Thomas Sewell: That’s basically what the cops did to us. Like:

“Oh, you’ve rocked up. You’ve rocked up with an opinion we don’t like!”

[Sound of being sprayed] Incredible!

[1:28:57]

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

[2:58:38]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/25/2024 = 532)

HyperChat min: 100

@Wolf
15 hours ago
Fuck Off We’re Full

Secure the future of our people
19 hours ago
Follow Joel, Tom, Blair and Jacob on twitter,

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://x.com/TomS38256360

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

https://x.com/maskedhersant

@david_smith
19 hours ago
I used to think Aussies where cool but they didn’t do NNR drama

Dawn Browning
19 hours ago
HersieTomJoelLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
good show guys WFP

Dawn Browning
19 hours ago
Homemade pizza is best. Mountain Bread from unsupermarkets is non-halal

@david_smith
19 hours ago
WP GG

DOLO
19 hours ago
o/

Secure the future of our people
19 hours ago
o/

Speak your mind
19 hours ago
Thanks guys.

@CampsLindburgh
19 hours ago
wp

@Mcb
19 hours ago
hail

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
o/

Walther Mauser
19 hours ago
\o

@Mcb
19 hours ago
cheers

WaffleStake
19 hours ago
Yeah but 15 years ago it was all white kids working at dominos and pizza hut

@david_smith
19 hours ago
It is legal to shoot a brown snake ins elf defence. but not borwn people? I

@Mcb
19 hours ago
run by browns

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
it’s shit anyways

@Mcb
19 hours ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
see the crust that got raised

WaffleStake
19 hours ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
yeah jeeps have completely taken over dominoes

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
smart move all round

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
i won’t eat Domino’s anymore because of Jeets

@Mcb
19 hours ago
this creature

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
all nons are not only complicit in white genocide, they are activiely participatiing in it

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Imagine thinking another thinks like you…..

@Mcb
19 hours ago
pure parasites

@Mcb
19 hours ago
just filthy cunts

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
never eat any food an indian has prepared…

@david_smith
19 hours ago
NOT WELCOME

Secure the future of our people
19 hours ago
Follow Joel, Blair and Jacob on twitter, Tom on (telegram)

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

https://x.com/maskedhersant

@david_smith
19 hours ago
They will be refugees soon.

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
they fuk with our food so yeet the Jeet

@Mcb
19 hours ago
I demand you fuck off brown

Secure the future of our people
19 hours ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1849387473358778448

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
he belongs in RoboCop

@Mcb
19 hours ago
meme

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
lol

@david_smith
19 hours ago
My based Grandfather survived WW2, didn’t fight

@Mcb
19 hours ago

@Anglo-Saxon
yes

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
the dysgenia

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
was he in the womb

WaffleStake
19 hours ago
genetically looks like he’s from Israel

@Mcb
19 hours ago

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Send Toimmay Robingson and his zogbot to take India

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
oy vey

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago

@Mcb
19 hours ago
pure faggot that fat old cunt

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
it actually was ours at one point

Dawn Browning
19 hours ago
They interviewed an Indian-looking “refugee” but didn’t say what she was refugeeing from where or why

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
lol

@david_smith
19 hours ago
India for the White Man

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
whatever nog, stop shitting on the street

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Blurr that out you amateur.

@Mcb
19 hours ago
evil

@Mcb
19 hours ago
brown rat

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Grosss

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
lolllll

Anglo-Saxon
19 hours ago
they made it all about white power o/

@Mcb
19 hours ago
Mitchell is an idiot

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
gang gang

Dawn Browning
19 hours ago
“1st they came for…..” There’s no escape.

@david_smith
19 hours ago
We always win or we would not exist.

@Mcb
19 hours ago
yes!!!!

@Mcb
19 hours ago
talk about shooting themselves in the foot

@Mcb
19 hours ago
Gillian lantouris burns coal

@Sweet_Nerevar
19 hours ago
Dutton looks as slippery as he is

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Dutton is a burn victim I assume?

@Clyde
19 hours ago
your body of work continues to get better with every action – momentum is what we have – use it!!!

@david_smith
19 hours ago
Not sure if it is clipped he did good content on this

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
no tears just clinking beers

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Rand is a faggot, but he did some cool memes around this

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
one day…..

DOLO
20 hours ago
lol

WaffleStake
20 hours ago
lol

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
love it

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago
WP

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
PUMPED

@david_smith
20 hours ago
There is a guy called Cultured Thug, who is antiWhite scum, he reads books but is low IQ retard

@Mcb
20 hours ago
from chink town

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
Ex Pakistani business partner of my parents, 3 of his 4 UK born children & their children have gone home. Others will follow.

@PureNomad
20 hours ago
Ste o/

WaffleStake
20 hours ago
the jews would expose themselves when they attempt to obstruct the deportations of other nons

@Mcb
20 hours ago
the domino’s are falling in our favour

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Deport all jeets and Chinese to Israel

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
yes, there’s a synergy there, all semites go

@Mcb
20 hours ago
they’re

@Mcb
20 hours ago
their delusional

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
lol

@Mcb
20 hours ago
a lot of these nons actually think they’re welcomed by white Australia

Walther Mauser
20 hours ago
Thanks for the show \o

@Mcb
20 hours ago
thanks fellas

@david_smith
20 hours ago
No disrespect, but book readers are often dim, some people understand nature, others don’t

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
I keep nagging Pete Quinones to read MK

@PureNomad
20 hours ago
damn Jacob is a bookworm

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
at least thank that man for a based donno fuggn’ell

@david_smith
20 hours ago
BOOKS ARE FOR FAGS

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@Mcb
They set a precedent

@david_smith
20 hours ago
LFG HIGH ENERGY

@Mcb
20 hours ago
yes dawn the smarter ones will leave first

@david_smith
20 hours ago
I have heard the nose is so punchable

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
take away thier right to vote, have any job with influence, education eg

@david_smith
20 hours ago
If they are not cool with being tourists.

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Retrospective WAP for citizenship, deport everyone else.

@Mcb
20 hours ago
and their wealth taken off them

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
make islam an unrecognised religion too

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
*first

@Mcb
20 hours ago
can’t wait to see the arrogance and entitlement washed off their face

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
they hate us equally, who care who we catapult fist

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Abos already have this, they just have to fight other ttibes for the space and gibs

@Mcb
20 hours ago
rest must go

@Mcb
20 hours ago
yes sax yes

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
there’s only one group; nons

@Mcb
20 hours ago
coons

@Mcb
20 hours ago
coins go to cuntry

@Mcb
20 hours ago
skinnies first for me

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Abos can just fuck off into wildlife reserves.

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago

@david_smith
^

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Maybe jews first?

@david_smith
20 hours ago
There is room for some nons, just needs to be clear mass deportation

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
Whties have paid enough already

@Mcb
20 hours ago
lebs are vile

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
But where will I get my Nando’s?

@Mcb
20 hours ago
seeing skinnies makes me physically ill

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Being White guarantees citizenship, would you like to learn more?

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
cancel nons

@david_smith
20 hours ago
No netting yahoo in the conservation zone

@david_smith
20 hours ago
The White Austalia Policy was vague AF so it could exclude anyone. Ekspciallially those type of subversives.

Archipelago Woes
20 hours ago
the love between a mother and child isn’t taught or imposed. tabula rasa is false

@Mcb
20 hours ago
they’re all going to reap what they’ve sown

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
if you fukn stink you out mud

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
*dedicated

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@PureNomad
Watching SL’s confidence grow has been awesome. He’s always been dedicayed.

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Make them all refos

@david_smith
20 hours ago
The Chinese love the White man like a medium rare Aussie cattle dog

@PureNomad
20 hours ago
Steve Laws as matured so much and got more on point

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
SL

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Chinese AI will just say let White Aussie breed and it is best.

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
The odds are still 3:1

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago
there is no “blank-slate.” parents hold the slate and the chalk

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Joel needs to go back to JFG show

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
they intercept pagers so wp super soldier babys will probably get their attention

WaffleStake
20 hours ago
Don’t the Chinese more or less do this already?

Archipelago Woes
20 hours ago
Jews have access to all this technology. that is also concerning.

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
fallopian tubes, luv

Ethno Nationalist
20 hours ago

@CampsLindburgh
TY 1488 o/

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@CampsLindburgh

@david_smith
20 hours ago
I hope they don’t test for spelling

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Stong swimmers FTW

Archipelago Woes
20 hours ago
Jacob makes a great point about purity vs IQ. interesting

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Eugenics is based AF

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago

Home

WaffleStake
20 hours ago
maybe high iq selection could eliminate leftism form good

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
lmao

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I like your BLM farm equipment one

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Damn that woman, I need to get up at 6am to get more beer before the niggers start showing up at the supermarket

Heartland
20 hours ago
I certify this stream Kosher. Shalom.

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
ponds live spit roasting nnr for when the boys are done here lol

Callaghan
20 hours ago
TEAM WHITE

ChainReaction
20 hours ago
doesn’t matter which puppet wins, it’s just a show

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

Callaghan
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
0/

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago
been “2 weeks away” since the 90’s

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
nice job o/

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago

@Anglo-Saxon
Thanks it was one of my original’s
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410013537/#q410040358

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
whites will be less likely to sign up for kamala

@ZippoMAN
20 hours ago
if the Don promised to bring beef tallow back to the mcdonalds french fry, it’d be a landslide election

Callaghan
20 hours ago
WHITE POWER\

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
that’s a goodn

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago

@tbs12345678
GN

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago
Less

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
Ey up

Operation Werewolf
20 hours ago
sorry a little late. will have to watch the start later

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
he is worse than Kamala

Callaghan
20 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
O/

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
I hope he looses

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago
“ask to see the manager and Mossad agent comes out”

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago
noice

ChainReaction
20 hours ago
More

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@tbs12345678
nice o/

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago

@tbs12345678
o/

Callaghan
20 hours ago

@tbs12345678
O/

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
I mean dammm

Operation Werewolf
20 hours ago
$148.80
HH

@CampsLindburgh
20 hours ago
or a theocracy with HH as the lord and Nietzsche as the gospel

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
nothing about zog or white genocide in his speech

Callaghan
20 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
O/

@Mcb
20 hours ago
Simon Birmingham

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
the white shabbos pollies are the worst

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@david_smith
u wot?

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
I hate dutton and albo, they are such dickheads

Callaghan
20 hours ago
O/

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Spell properly please

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago

@Mcb
:hundred_points:

@david_smith
20 hours ago

@Mcb
This is not Engish

@Mcb
20 hours ago
HH

BASEDVLAD
20 hours ago
“Among other remarks,Tacitus brands the Jews as a race of men hated by the gods. They regard as profane everything that we(Romans) hold as sacred—and vice versa.”

@Mcb
20 hours ago
Dutto is a sad cunt

@PureNomad
20 hours ago
100% Joel I feel that being English, I don’t like our current royals… but also detest all the nones and libs hating on them just as a way to attack my nation

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
Peter Dutton announced today he will be giving $10million to the Sydney Jewish museum.

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
Joel is right

@Mcb
20 hours ago
my land liquorland are going down

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
Jews and the glorious revolution

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago

@david_smith
You leave my brain parasites alone.

@david_smith
20 hours ago
CCG is not sane

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
oh no lol

Callaghan
20 hours ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
that was embarrassing

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago
Less

@david_smith
20 hours ago
It would ban hanging everyone who was a traitor, there needs to be a fair trail

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
it feels like we only have consumer rites here

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
kek

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
100 % true

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago
lol

@Mcb
20 hours ago
Abolanche

@Mcb
20 hours ago
what do you call a coon rolling down a hill?

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
there would nothing here it it were not for European settlers

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 hours ago
Less

@Mcb
20 hours ago

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
lol

Patton Was Right
20 hours ago
My Chemical Vance

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
eyeliner too

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
he botox maxing or what

@david_smith
20 hours ago
who*

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Whi Nose the number?

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
fuck off we’re full

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
bit of a coincidence

@Sweet_Nerevar
20 hours ago
he’s funny as

DOLO
20 hours ago
I didn’t know that.

@Mcb
20 hours ago
she’s foul without makeup

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
they are jews

@david_smith
20 hours ago
These evil nazis who will not show their faces and Lydia Thorpe steal the news headlines

Patton Was Right
20 hours ago
they only care if you misrepresent yourself as Jewish

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
Aussie Elizabeth Warren

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Free trains for socialism.

danzimmons
20 hours ago
Theo Von knew exactly what he was doing

DOLO
20 hours ago
His entire career is a product of Theil

@david_smith
20 hours ago
I heard they like working hard and outdoor leisure, like camping.

ThinRedLine
20 hours ago
who came around the turn of the century

@PureNomad
20 hours ago

@GoyBoy1488
was a guy on youtube who broke LoTR’s down with a nationalist slant, brilliant little series… but yt deleted it or he removed it

@david_smith
20 hours ago
We can just emu to avoid being Ostchicheyesed

Dawn Browning
20 hours ago

@BASEDVLAD
Interesting. Which dictionary?

ChainReaction
20 hours ago
can’t even do cocaine anymore…

Anglo-Saxon
20 hours ago

@BASEDVLAD
well that describes the jew in a nutshell lol

@GoyBoy1488
20 hours ago

@PureNomad
so many people dont understand the deeper truths in there :/ it is fantastic

@ssanwaerter
20 hours ago
Andrew george edition?

BASEDVLAD
20 hours ago
Another jew subversion of the word. Chauvinist = believing or showing an unreasonable belief that your own country or race is the best or most important: dictionary cambridge

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago

@PureNomad
100%

The Crucible 01
20 hours ago
^

@david_smith
20 hours ago
Do you ever get any resistance from rural Whites?

@joeldavis

@PureNomad
20 hours ago
Lord Of The Rings is our peoples

danzimmons
20 hours ago
they’re p doughs

Patton Was Right
20 hours ago

@Alison-Chains
o/

@Alison-Chains
20 hours ago
heading to work. I’ll be listening. \o

@Mcb
20 hours ago
my land liquorland

danzimmons
21 hours ago
it’s why we fight

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
hope he gets eaten by an escalator

Dawn Browning
21 hours ago
diluted honey

@david_smith
21 hours ago
In last couple days

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
hope that gook gets crushed in machinery

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago
6 months ago in west Melbourne a group of year 12 niggers bashed a year 7 girl, she was hospitalized for a couple of weeks.

@david_smith
21 hours ago
There was a video of a White guy getting arrested for being bashed by a black guy at the Gold Coast.

Dawn Browning
21 hours ago
Ey up HOIT. Is o/ & o7 still permitted?

@CampsLindburgh
21 hours ago
rioted all summer over some nog dying of an overdose while in cop custody

danzimmons
21 hours ago
never relax

danzimmons
21 hours ago
black nigger privilege

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
yeah its a good one

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago
was this in western melbourne?

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
they will never stop , fukn inbreds

@PureNomad
21 hours ago
instant arrest and 3 weeks of news articles on you

@Mcb
21 hours ago
cops and msm tan cover till it happened again

danzimmons
21 hours ago
jewish owned system

Ithinkthisisbroken
21 hours ago
they only attack small animals children and old

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Brisbane used to be part of Qld

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
having them here is child abuse to white kids

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Nah but spoken to the guy who made it on 4chan, it was a /nzg/ classic a couple years back.

@Mcb
21 hours ago
this fucking coon tried to do it a month before at the beach

danzimmons
21 hours ago
poor White children having to deal with niggers

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
a female of which species

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
fkn savage scum

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago
looks like an abbo

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
you make that one?

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
lol

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
That’s a woman?

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago
Thats a woman?

@david_smith
21 hours ago
DNA evidence suggest an unknown species DNA was involved in the crime

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Less

@GoyBoy1488
21 hours ago
joel needs soap to wash his spicy balls

@GoyBoy1488
21 hours ago
more super chats lads

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
my vrill fills in traffic

@david_smith
21 hours ago
I thought jumback was a Boer thing TBH

@david_smith
21 hours ago
The only victor he has seens went over his brow before he didn’t know what a jumback is

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
lol

The Crucible 01
21 hours ago
p
Less

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Fuck this wog with his anti-jumback sluers

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
also hold head up when in shower washing it off , otherwise it can get in your eyes again.

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Lydia Thorpe is worse than anzis

@GoyBoy1488
21 hours ago
$14.88
“spicy balls for the race” o/

@CampsLindburgh
21 hours ago
need a sign: “we’re here to speak to the manager” maybe they’ll send out the local mossad agent

@david_smith
21 hours ago
You cannot put this stuff in a fire extinguisher.

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
wet dream

@david_smith
21 hours ago
I don’t know just what the internet said*

@david_smith
21 hours ago
milk or fat

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago

@bodukemfer
I agree ,clean your room up boomers

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Gazza would probably like it

@GoyBoy1488
21 hours ago
$14.88
do you all shoot up pure vrill before you head to the protest?

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Greta super glues her self to gaza

Low_Born
21 hours ago
White men over 40 should be ready to sacrifice for Whites of the future. Boomers to the frontline.

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
you need a spy on other side getting mad propaganda footage

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
its the pot calling the kettle black, Americans have guns and don’t do shit with them

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
lol muh guns

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Jeets are the real racists

@PureNomad
21 hours ago
take the free publicity

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
never met a bad gazza

Ithinkthisisbroken
21 hours ago
Well Done Gentleman

@david_smith
21 hours ago
yeet tha jeet

@Mcb
21 hours ago
the entitlement is nauseating

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
not at all

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago
Less

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
*get some

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
got some drums like gangs of new York, fuk their tamborines

@Mcb
21 hours ago
fuck up stink

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
fkn clowns…

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
hahaha

DOLO
21 hours ago
lmao

@PureNomad
21 hours ago
lol

@Mcb
21 hours ago
when you blokes the young brown a stink that arked up at Corowa

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
yeah because these cartoon brains think you work for shredder

the woodlander
21 hours ago
looks like their latest tik tok dance routine

danzimmons
21 hours ago
chemical warfare on legal protesters

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
women with power are usually worse than men

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
‘Leaked…’

WaffleStake
21 hours ago
I like this new term ‘non’ to refer to non Whites

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
Very White pilling to see Aussie men fighting back o/

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
fairs a white man’s game, zogs a nog

WaffleStake
21 hours ago
the left are gunt guards for Zionism

Low_Born
21 hours ago
All of your restraint is honorable & heroic, but when can we flex our full White Power?

DOLO
21 hours ago
After folding the flag up, and leaving, they claim they chased you off.

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
fuk yeah boys wish I was a melbooner

WaffleStake
21 hours ago

@Anglo-Saxon
ain’t that the truth

danzimmons
21 hours ago
ignorant fucking kommie filth

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
kills me to see whites protesting for muds

SS-Super-Soldier
21 hours ago
fuck all jog bots

BASEDVLAD
21 hours ago
\o

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
o7 to the Zogbots

DOLO
21 hours ago
wtf lol

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
“take your mask off” so we can harass your family and employers… what sub-human scum

@PureNomad
21 hours ago
good going guys o/

@Mcb
21 hours ago
that’s it

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
reeeeeeeeee

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
some drunk Kunt was doing kapaweara ?? one time ina taxi line and the dumb fuk accidentally made contact with my face, so I shnaped him. he pretended to be knocked out lol

Reichsgesetz
21 hours ago
there you go^

@Mcb
21 hours ago
ganging the dune would of been nice taste of own medicine

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Even in QLd they got rid of the defense against murder if you kill a poof propositioning you.

Reichsgesetz
21 hours ago
our activists should seriously start carrying anti-pepperspray goggles or masks of some kind

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago
You can get goggles similar to sunglasses, just making sure you don’t get brazing googles, you won’t be able to see shit.
Less

1
0
danzimmons
21 hours ago
bad shiiieet

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
a cat shit can fuk me up

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Wear positive pressure suits to protect from covid

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
zee googlez do nothzing

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago

@PureNomad
I’m white as a

@PureNomad
21 hours ago

@PattonWasRight
did you have a suntan at the time?

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
Big Can Mark 9, small can Mark 3 most likely

@david_smith
21 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I’m an ideas amn

danzimmons
21 hours ago
chemical weapons, bastids

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
I had a half-breed say he’s whiter than me

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago

@david_smith
Not a bad idea

danzimmons
21 hours ago
turbo niggers

@Mcb
21 hours ago
Sudanese the most putrid of putrid

@Sweet_Nerevar
21 hours ago
got to block a half Jeet today , feels gud man

@Mcb
21 hours ago
there wasn’t any skinnies

@david_smith
21 hours ago
WHy not spray on a white map of Australia on your black shirts?

danzimmons
21 hours ago
Pre jew infection

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Based

danzimmons
21 hours ago
use what the people know

danzimmons
21 hours ago
brilliant

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
Ancient Aussie culture

ChainReaction
21 hours ago
good old Ozrock

@Mcb
21 hours ago
nsn cover

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
it’s 100 times worse

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Do you have footage?

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
the worst part about pepper spray is the reflash

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Chicoms are the real jews

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
Israel are the real nazis

@david_smith
21 hours ago
The Ye flag?

@Mcb
21 hours ago
dune coon IQ

danzimmons
21 hours ago
friend’s like her

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago
Vilification? How are we responsible for that? We didn’t make them criminal, raping, or in the least incredibly unpleasant to be around. They vilify themselves.

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
Huge L

Reichsgesetz
21 hours ago
On your last topic. It’s simple, two sets of law. One set of laws for the native folk with full rights and duties. Another set of laws for visiting foreigners with very minimal rights.

@Mcb
21 hours ago
his wife is a dune shark

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
I would love to see all that play out minus police

Low_Born
21 hours ago
Zogbots need to fear enforcement

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Covid starts, masks are bad, then everyone needs a mask to walk on the footpath, then only evil baddies wear masks…

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
is that all you got

DOLO
21 hours ago
Need goggles or some type of eye protection.

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
Pepper spray ain’t bad

danzimmons
21 hours ago
penalty’s lol for what

@Moonman
21 hours ago
toad goblina

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
he’s the real Aryan

DOLO
21 hours ago
mylvagnam style

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
The nigger perspective

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
Good Lord

@Mcb
21 hours ago
yes brown yes

@Moonman
21 hours ago
you guys are big meanies

@david_smith
21 hours ago
also goannas*

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
dropped his baton

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
lol

@david_smith
21 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Quolls, snakes, foxes, cats and the occasional dingo.

@Mcb
21 hours ago
Dutto cuck

Anglo-Saxon
21 hours ago
White pollies are traitors

@Mcb
21 hours ago
ratnam foul cunt

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
nam

@Ral9010NatSoc
21 hours ago
War torn India?

@Moonman
21 hours ago
suckdeep sumshit

@Mcb
21 hours ago
fck up gurpreet

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
21 hours ago
He can’t even spell Aaron properly

@david_smith
21 hours ago
Gross, blur that

@Mcb
21 hours ago
fck

Patton Was Right
21 hours ago
useful idiots face the

Low_Born
22 hours ago
BASED

the woodlander
22 hours ago

@david_smith
i have 8 cats on the smallholding, guess theyre antisemetic too.. i knew it.

DOLO
22 hours ago
Did you see his sword video? lol

@Moonman
22 hours ago
hard bullying

@CampsLindburgh
22 hours ago
Lindsay is part of the comatose right

DOLO
22 hours ago
American kids used to have a gun class at school

@david_smith
22 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Snakes here are possibly antisemites, they kill all the rats

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago
The left are the real racists

the woodlander
22 hours ago

@david_smith
yes, a few species, not that common though

@david_smith
22 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Yeah, I mean like in the wilderness, the honest wildlife type snake

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
lol

the woodlander
22 hours ago

@david_smith
we have a few, usualy found in the houses of Parliament

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago
Christian Nationalism is a cringe civnat grift

@PureNomad
22 hours ago
we never was gifted free speech either

@Mcb
22 hours ago
rumble chat no tonight ?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
/pol/ vs /leftypol/

@Mcb
22 hours ago
gab chat non existent??

@david_smith
22 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Do they still have actual snakes in England?

danzimmons
22 hours ago
utilizing the enemies resources is bad M’kay

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago
is her name AlwaysHonest. One of the high iqs told me she’s white

Mark Collett
22 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
hahahahaha

@Mcb
22 hours ago
Margo loves a leb train

the woodlander
22 hours ago

@MarkCollett
snakes and ladders is as far as they go

Beige
22 hours ago
88 Viewers

Low_Born
22 hours ago
Boldness of street level zogbots needs removed.

Mark Collett
22 hours ago
Women don’t play chess!

danzimmons
22 hours ago
Joel’s destroyed Toms point about being serious lol

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
Looks like I walked back in from my smoke with bad timing. Sorry.

@david_smith
22 hours ago
Notice how all the dangerous snakes are browns and blacks, God is real QED

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago

@PattonWasRight
lol

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I heard that’s low iq

danzimmons
22 hours ago
it’s basically the same anti racist bullshite they’ve been making since the sixties

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
The very last thing White nationalism needs is niggers and jews

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
what about the based browns

@Ral9010NatSoc
22 hours ago
NetFlix got Tom. Shieeeet.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
Browns are against us, browns are not us.

danzimmons
22 hours ago
lol

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
No we don’t

@Moonman
22 hours ago
magic niggers and the rainbow dildo…. fantastic flick

DOLO
22 hours ago
He rescues his wife’s black bf

danzimmons
22 hours ago
Neeson noooo lol

the woodlander
22 hours ago
bad optics, too hardline, its been said about every nationalist group for 100 years..

@david_smith
22 hours ago
forgot your masks

@david_smith
22 hours ago
Antifa feds

@Mcb
22 hours ago
masked

Low_Born
22 hours ago
o/

danzimmons
22 hours ago
Hersant!

danzimmons
22 hours ago
lmao

@david_smith
22 hours ago
lol MSM comment sections always say you are not racist

@Mcb
22 hours ago
the kikes plan has almost worked to a tea

danzimmons
22 hours ago
the jew appreciate’s when you do nothing

the woodlander
22 hours ago
build our own future, start now.

@Mcb
22 hours ago
on YouTube just foul

danzimmons
22 hours ago
buying time is trump farrage’s job

@david_smith
22 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
You should think about hosting a call in show

the woodlander
22 hours ago
huge difference between talking and doing.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
yes of course

Callaghan
22 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
ARE WE DOING A ASHOW?

@Mcb
22 hours ago
marko yee

@Mcb
22 hours ago
fat cuck kelly

danzimmons
22 hours ago
ie cuck

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
It’s great that the left would compliment people like that

danzimmons
22 hours ago
lie

@david_smith
22 hours ago
You cannot be honest, it will make you look bad

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
22 hours ago
But I am racist

ChainReaction
22 hours ago

@MarkCollett
o7

danzimmons
22 hours ago
^

Mark Collett
22 hours ago
Hi guys! Keep up the great work!

@Moonman
22 hours ago
then when? were just starting to make traction

danzimmons
22 hours ago
how dare you do ANYTHING goi

ChainReaction
22 hours ago
Aryan women were constantly attacking me to get the coof jab, wear mask, stay how etc during the whole covid bs

danzimmons
22 hours ago
G

danzimmons
22 hours ago
they told on their neighbors like the jew told them to

Low_Born
22 hours ago
I

@Mcb
22 hours ago
N

the woodlander
22 hours ago
buffering loads, ill try rumble

danzimmons
22 hours ago
°/

the woodlander
22 hours ago

@danzimmons
hi mate

danzimmons
22 hours ago
Simon!

the woodlander
22 hours ago
evening everyone

danzimmons
22 hours ago
they’ll have to turn them off eventually

@Moonman
22 hours ago
we can be both

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago
Patriots o7

danzimmons
22 hours ago
wow they still have comment’s?’

Patton Was Right
22 hours ago
Good day, lads o/

danzimmons
22 hours ago
the media mind control machine utilizing their spin

Low_Born
22 hours ago
o/

@Moonman
22 hours ago
o/

danzimmons
22 hours ago
fucking double speak

SS-Super-Soldier
22 hours ago
o/

Beige
22 hours ago

ChainReaction
22 hours ago
Less

NonKiller
22 hours ago
all women

danzimmons
22 hours ago
appeal’s to the matrix i guess

danzimmons
22 hours ago
MKultra voice

danzimmons
22 hours ago
i hate their smug middle class

ChainReaction
22 hours ago
are these those horrible racists i keep hearing abt on the news?

@Mcb
22 hours ago
7 news

danzimmons
22 hours ago
°/

@katana17
23 hours ago
Lst week’s show transcript. [Joel Davis – White Man Fight Back! – Oct 17, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – White Man Fight Back! – Oct 17, 2024 – Transcript

joeldavis
23 hours ago
N

@Mcb
22 hours ago
anyone else rumble weird ?

@CampsLindburgh
22 hours ago

@katana17
ty o/

1
0

@Mcb
22 hours ago

@Mcb
22 hours ago
R

@Romeoxxx777
22 hours ago
E

@CampsLindburgh
22 hours ago
G

@Mcb
22 hours ago
let me hear it….. Aus for the white man fuck off we’re full and again

@Mcb
22 hours ago
rumble is funny

@EdmonWHAUS
22 hours ago
G

@Mcb
23 hours ago
I

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 31,736

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5: Thu, Oct 31, 2024 — Transcript completed so far = 89/179 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 4: Wed, Oct 30, 2024 — Transcript completed so far = 69/179 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 3: Tue, Oct 29, 2024 — Transcript completed so far = 57/179 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 2: Sat, Oct 26, 2024 — Transcript completed so far = 41/179 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Fri, Oct 25, 2024 — Published post. Transcript completed so far = 24/179 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee comments (532).

Mark Collett – Patriotic Weekly Review – with Jacob Hersant – Oct 16, 2024 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 17 Oct 2024 07:40:27 +0000

Mark Collett

Patriotic Weekly Review with

Jacob Hersant

Wed, Oct 16, 2024

[In this livestream video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, talks with proud Aussie National Socialist Jacob Hersant. Items discussed include:

Jacob Hersant is a 25-year-old Australian National Socialist activist.
He faces legal troubles for giving a “Nazi gesture” in public.
Jacob founded the National Socialist Network in Australia.
Believes in “Australia for the Whiteman” as a core principle.
He’s appealing his conviction on free speech grounds, but faces a “relatively modest term of imprisonment” if appeals fail.
Has been politically active since age 15-16.
Sees growth in explicit White nationalist movements in Australia.
NSN focuses on legal activism and political messaging, and being “uncompromising in your founding principles.”
Argues White nationalists and National Socialists face similar persecution.
Supports separation of races and repatriation of non-White immigrants.
Has sympathy for other racial nationalists but prioritizes Whites.
Jacob defines racism as “putting your particular race first.”
Advocates for aboriginals to be given separate reservations.
Sees his legal case as a “win-win” for publicity.
Urges supporters to donate to other causes, not his legal defense.
Allows free use of his content: “Do whatever you want with my videos.”
Criticizes compromise and moderation in nationalist movements.
Admires historical figures like Adolf Hitler and George Lincoln Rockwell.
Sees White people worldwide facing similar threats.
Believes National Socialism is the best ideology for this era.
Argues against watering down principles for electoral success.
Sees his group’s radical image as an asset for publicity.
Believes Australia is being “demographically replaced” rapidly.
Criticizes conservative parties for aiding “the worst aspects of our enemies.”
Sees potential for more radical nationalist parties to gain support.
Advocates a “holistic mindset” in nationalist activism.
Believes white nationalists will inevitably be called “Nazis” anyway.
Sees the Second World War as an unavoidable topic in debates.
Argues National Socialism is no less “sellable” than White nationalism.
Criticizes the “egregious censorship” and “moral policing” in society.
Believes his group’s messaging resonates with average Australians.
Sees his imprisonment as less concerning than UK political prisoners.
Quotes Rockwell: “The path to the palace leads through the dungeons.”
Believes nationalists shouldn’t apologize for their views anymore.
Sees increasing public support for their position in Australia.
Advocates working with other races internationally, not domestically.
“We need to be immovable on our ideals. Australia for the White man. White revolution is the only solution.”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/PWR284:5

https://www.bitchute.com/video/av00nXkTCB9i

https://rumble.com/v5iv3gj-patriotic-weekly-review-with-jacob-hersant.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

https://gab.com/MarkCollett

https://gab.com/jacobhersant

Published on Wed, Oct 16, 2024

Description

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Jacob Hersant
October 17, 2024
1,286 views
164
Support
Save
Repost
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
15K followers
Join
Following
Episode 284 of Patriotic Weekly Review with special guest Jacob Hersant.
Patriotic Weekly Review is a news and entertainment talk show. Opinions, thoughts, and views of guests/hosts do not necessarily represent the opinions, thoughts, and views of all hosts, and their appearance on this channel does not constitute sympathy, agreement, or endorsement of said opinions, thoughts, and views.
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrs
JUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Jacob Hersant
Telegram:
https://t.me/jacobhersant
File size
2.74 GB
Less
4.22
434 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 18,579 – Duration: 2:05:13 mins)

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 284. And we are here live tonight on Odysee, DLive, Rumble and Entropy. It’s going to be a big show. We have got the man of the hour with us. I’ll be introducing him shortly. His name says Joel, but it is not Joel, as you can see, it’s Jacob Hersant. And Jacob is a man who has been in the news recently and will be talking tonight extensively about why he’s been in the news about his fight for freedom of speech and fight for freedom of expression, and why he’s the first man in the whole of Australia to be taken to court for waving his arm in the air. That is the kind of tyranny they are living under in Australia!

But before we get into that, please do like and share the stream. Please do help get the word out. Please do make sure as many people know about this stream as possible because it’s really important and it’s a new guest. People often say:

“Mark, you keep having the same guests on.”

And that is a valid criticism, but this is a new one, and I try to get a new one on when new and intelligent people come up and we can give them a bit of a leg up and help them to tell their story. And that’s what tonight’s all about. So if you’re one of the people who likes new guests, give this a shout out.

Now, I’m going to be back later in the week. I’m going to be back on Friday with a pre-recorded video, back on Friday with Dr David Duke. And I don’t think, I’m not sure whether I’m around on Sunday, but I am planning something for the Halloween stream, which will be later in the month. There’s going to be no book club this month because of the Halloween stream. So with all that in mind, please do check out my other videos as well. We did a great film club this week with Devon Stack and we’ve also got a video out about how Tommy Robinson wants to bring Indians to the UK, because apparently Indians are wonderful people. But India is actually the most dangerous country in the world for women and girls. Tommy wants to protect everyone from Muslim groomers, but he wants to import men from the country that has the most child brides in the whole world. So no joined-up thinking from Tommy Robinson there. So check that video out.

And finally, if you want to support this stream, if you want to support my work, if you think what I do is good, if you like PWR, if you like Patriotic Alternative, if you like all of the good things that I do week in, week out, please consider making a small donation.

Now, hundreds of people watch this show live, and thousands and thousands of people watch it over its lifespan when it’s up online. If everyone gave, $3, we would be very well funded. So please consider something. $3, $5, $10. Nothing’s behind the paywall or give whatever you feel the show is worth. This is what keeps my head above water. It allows me to keep doing these shows. It allows me to keep doing the activism that I do and arranging all the things in the real world that I do, such as the support network for political prisoners.

So please consider making a donation throughout the show.

And if you do make a donation, please do attach a question for myself or Jacob and we will answer it in the second hour of the show. So the second hour of the show will all be questions from the audience. So if you want to support my work and you want to support what we’re doing here, please consider something and we will answer your question later in the show.

Now, you can also donate by crypto-currency. All the crypto links are in the description below.

And finally, I’m a very approachable guy. You can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. I’m always available for a chat or for some advice, etc. Etc. Or just generally for feedback. And I get people from all over the world writing to me. And you’re welcome to write to me too, whenever you want. As I said, none of that is behind any paywall. So please do consider giving a small donation.

Anyway, let’s get into the show because it’s going to be a good one.

Now, tonight we’ve got a young up and comer on the scene. He’s Australian. You might have seen him alongside the likes of Joel Davis, alongside Blair Cottrell, alongside Thomas Sewell. He is a man that is going through legal troubles of his own because the Australian government at the moment is going through somewhat of a draconian clamp down on nationalists, on the symbols that they can display, on the things that they can say, and on the way they hold their arm! So Jacob, without further ado, would you like to introduce yourself to my audience? It’s a pleasure to have you here tonight. Introduce yourself to my audience and tell people what you’ve been going through.

[04:39]

Jacob Hersant: Hello. Thank you for that introduction. My name is Jacob Hersant. It’s a nice 05:00 am here in Melbourne, Victoria, in Australia.

So I’m a little bit tired, but I digress. I’ll try my best to be as cogent and articulate as possible. I’m an Australian National Socialist. I’ve been a political activist for eight years now. And most of my activism has been for an organisation which I founded, the National Socialist Network.

A lot of people know about us now because of our kind of NS attention grabbing activism. We’ve become basically a household name here in Australia based on that activism. Right now I’m in the news particular for being the first person in the state of Victoria for being charged with giving the Nazi salute. I was convicted in the magistrate’s court, which is the lowest court in Australia, not for giving the Nazi salute, but giving a “Nazi gesture” that resembles the Nazi salute.

So the laws are very broad. If people confuse you for giving the Nazi salute, you can be convicted as well.

So the magistrate actually ruled I didn’t give the Nazi salute, which I think most people would probably agree with, because most people know what the Nazi salute looks likes. But I did give a gesture that could be confused for the Nazi salute, and most people would confuse it for the Nazi salute, which I can. I can agree with. I don’t think that’s an unreasonable finding for the magistrate to find. But we didn’t only make that argument.

So the reason this court case is going to go on for a while and I’m going to be appealing it, is because my lawyer made an argument that this law is invalid based on the fact that Australia has an implied right to freedom of political communication. So Australia doesn’t have any explicit right to political communication or freedom of speech or anything like that. But we have High Court rulings or High Court judgements that affirm the fact that because we are a liberal democracy, the Constitution outlines a liberal democracy, that by virtue of that fact, we have an implied right of political communication because that system would not work without there being freedom of speech and freedom of political communication.

So that’s what I’m going to be appealing about. And that’s what there’s going to be lots of publicity about this case going forward into the future. That argument’s going to be made at higher courts, all the way to the High Court because, yeah, I’ve indicated that I want to take it all the way. My lawyers are happy to take it all the way.

So it’s going to be a long, long process. But I don’t mind this court battle in particular. I’ve had other court battles which have been less fun because I’ve had to either represent myself or I’ve been facing more serious charges, serious punishments. I can talk about that further on in the stream.

So I’ve been convicted of giving the Nazi gesture that resembles a Nazi salute, but I’ve also been sentenced to imprisonment. I haven’t been given the exact length of imprisonment. What the magistrate said is it will be a relatively modest term of imprisonment. So whether that’s one month or two months or three months, I’m not sure.

A lot of people are worried for me because I’ll be going to jail, but I won’t be going to jail until all of my rights of appeal are exhausted, so I won’t be punished for it until all of its done. So people don’t need to worry about me in the immediate future. And they don’t need to worry about me in general, because I’m happy. I’m not happy to go to jail, but I’m willing to go to jail to make this argument, because I believe that Australians should have the right to political communication, not only for us, particularly as a political group, as National Socialists, but everyone should have the right to express themselves. I think that’s a right that Anglo Saxons cherish. And it is a bit of a strange situation in 2024 where you have the “fascists” defending free speech against a liberal, an allegedly liberal government.

But it’s not the most confusing thing I’ve seen in 2024, so.

Mark Collett: So how old are you, if you don’t mind me asking?

Jacob Hersant: I’m 25 years old.

Mark Collett: You’re 25 years old! Oh, what I would give to be 25 again! And you’re really in the thick of this, but you’ve been an activist for quite some time, so this isn’t something new to you’ve obviously come into nationalism quite young, but generally speaking, this might not be something you’re aware of or it might be something you’re aware of, when I was in the BNP, you probably. Were you alive then? Yeah. You would have been very, very small.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I born in 1991.

Mark Collett: So by the time the BNP was in decline, in about 2010, you’d have been eleven. But the point is, the BNP was the most successful electoral nationalist group in the UK. And we looked at our data, we looked at our membership data and we could see that the average length a member would be involved was 18 months. So when you took everyone’s membership into account and you did an average. The average length of membership was 18 months.

So the average person never got to being two years involved in the organisation. But you’re 25. You’ve been involved in this movement for eight years. Logically, that means you got involved when you were 17, and you’ve spent around a third of your life involved.

So you’re pretty committed to this. You’ve been involved for quite a long time when you take your whole life into account. I mean, obviously not a long time when you take human existence into account, but a third of your life involving the cause is very, very admirable. You came into things a little bit younger than I did. How do you feel over the time that you’ve been involved? Have things changed in Australia in terms of the acceptance of the movement, involvement of people in more radical politics, and has there been a greater acceptance of your opinions and the things that you’re fighting for?

[12:02]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, so I think we’ve grown a lot as an explicit National Socialist movement. When I was first getting involved in politics, there was really nothing. There was nothing in way of a well, even really just an explicit White nationalist movement or National Socialist movement. We’ve had a remnants of previous groups, older groups that were still around, but they were more or less defunct, maybe just running an Internet blog or something. Really websites that look like they’re from 2005 and things like that.

But there was a milieu of people that were energized from the Trump campaign. So you had people that were associating with the Alt-Right and all that kind of meme magic energy of that time.

I wasn’t involved when I was 17. It was earlier than that. So I was getting involved in our circles, probably around 15 years old, 16 years old is when I became involved in real life.

I started meeting up with people off websites like The Right Stuff dot biz, [TRS] and Iron March* and things like that.

[* Iron March was a far-Right neo-fascist and Neo-Nazi web forum. The site opened in 2011 and attracted neo-fascist and Neo-Nazi members, including militants from organised far-Right groups and members who would later go on to commit acts of terror! The forum closed in 2017. Subsequently, former users moved to alternative websites and social networking services, such as Discord. Wikipedia]

Well, Iron March doesn’t exist anymore. TRS still exists in some sort of form, but they had a forum back then. And I was meeting people, and I was just encouraging people. I was like:

“We gotta get involved in real life. Like, we need to start our own organisation and do things like that.”

So we originally founded an organisation called Antipodean Resistance. Antipodean just refers to Australia and New Zealand, because it’s the opposite part of the world as Europe. And that was explicit National Socialism. But it was very, very radical! And it could accurately be described as “extremist”, because the way it presented itself it had a very militant look. It wasn’t engaged in violence or anything like that, but it projected that more or less kind of nowhere near as bad as, like, what Atomwaffen was, but it was that kind of vein.

Like, that wasn’t my choice. What we have now is my choice because that’s an organisation I founded, but nonetheless, I was in those circles and I was participating in that.

But then I was branching out, and I was getting involved with other movements as well, like the Lads Society. So there’s all these kind of organisations like UPF, United Patriots Front. I won’t go too deep into a level, but I basically was getting in contact with everybody.

And eventually I founded this, because most people didn’t really believe in my vision of activism, which was being explicitly National Socialist, but being focused on politics rather than kind of militant messaging. And I won’t repeat any of the kind of slogans and the things that Antipodean Resistance represented, as you’re in Britain, but people can Google that if they want to know what that was like about.

So from all that kind of stuff, from Lads Society and Antipodean Resistance, I came from all that and founded National Socialist Network. And it was originally just me, and whoever I could rope around for a photo. People can go and check the initial photos that were posted of National Socialist Network, and it’s basically like an art blog of me [chuckling] just posted in the black mask and the black clothes. And there’s very few people in it, just a few of my friends I could rope along.

But now it’s grown to basically the biggest group in Australia, a household name as I said.

To answer your question about how much success we’ve had in terms of the movement, I think now we actually have an established organisation. We’ve got the banner up, and people can join and get involved with people that have been involved in it for quite a while. We haven’t been involved as long as someone like you have, like Thomas Sewell and myself and Joel and all that.

But nonetheless, I’ve been involved for, it’s probably nine years now. I think I was saying eight years, a year ago. So it’s probably nine years now. Yeah, and I just think all across the world, everyone will probably feel how much progress has been made in terms of getting our messaging out there, how much support we have.

And I think part of that is also just how decadent and terrible things are becoming socially in Western countries. There would have just been decades even before your time Mark, wherever people were just so comfortable in the seventies and the eighties, and immigration wasn’t an existential crisis of all of our nations. It was a lot more manageable when these minorities actually were minorities. But now they’re becoming a very sizable minority, soon to become majorities in all the major cities of White countries.

So I think we’re making lots of progress. I’m very optimistic about how things, things are going with our organisation, in particular in Australia. I’m optimistic about this legal fight. I think we won’t have any troubles actually winning. Even if we don’t win, because that’s a possibility. Maybe the High Court will rule that free speech doesn’t apply to Nazis. Political communication isn’t allowed for Nazis.

But nonetheless, the whole circus around all of this, how it’s made the government look, the publicity it’s got for us, how it’s made us look to White Australians who value political rights, I think all of it will be worth it.

So I think it’s always just going to be a win-win, what’s happening now. So I’m optimistic.

Mark Collett: So, obviously, your group, you would describe it as being more or less the most Right-wing group in Australia.

And you mentioned some other groups like Atomwaffen, who were just absolute fed nutcases! How do you stop your group attracting those kind of people? I mean, I’ve had a few guests on who spoke about Atomwaffen, the kind of people that were involved, absolute dibs, who did nothing good for the movement. And those kind of people sort of gravitate towards something they feel is going to be more edgy and more extreme. How do people like yourself and Joel keep those kind of people away from your group and stop it from descending, like other groups who are obviously openly NS, have done in the past?

[19:57]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I think the main problem with Atomwaffen is the leadership. It’s always the leadership. And what is going to be tolerated.

Mark Collett: Well, I mean, the main problem were they were basically Feds and sort of spergy Satanist dorks who killed each other.

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, I don’t, …

Mark Collett: You know, that’s not just a small problem, that’s like a huge problem. And it obviously attracted those sort of people. And I know there’s been numerous people who’ve written long exposes on how the feds were heavily involved with them, but you guys seem to avoided those kind of spergy nuts.

And what I’m asking you is sort of, how did you manage to structure your group so it attracted people that weren’t those kind of spergy* nuts?

[* Spergy-Used to describe an individual as socially unaware, or inept. Just to the right of being incapable of social interaction. Tolerable, if you have sympathy for their lack of understanding. Origin: A play off of Asperger’s Syndrome. A functional portion of the Autistic Spectrum. Often those who use the word “spergy” have more sensitivity than people who use the term “retarded” to describe the socially inept. Source: Urban Dictionary]

Jacob Hersant: I think it just comes from excluding those kind of people that aren’t in it for legal activism. Because our organisation is about legal activism.

Obviously, we get charged for things like Bill Posting. I’ve been charged with Bill postering and obviously giving the salute. But we don’t engage in any kind of unlawful or illegal activity that most people would look at my criminal record and go:

“Why are these things crimes? Like putting up stickers? Why is putting up a sticker a crime? Why is giving a gesture a crime?”

So that’s the kind of political “crime” that we’re kind of engaged in. It’s a low level stuff. We’re not interested in violence or killing people, or even just attacking our enemies in a kind of low level way, like street brawls and all those kind of things. We’re interested in political messaging. I think the fundamental thing is the leadership!

The fact that we’re not going to tolerate people that aren’t there for our mission, our political mission, which is primarily to build out our strength of the movement, to recruit more members, and to bring our message to White Australians. The most effective way we can do that, is legally and through legal activism, just regular political activism. So we’re focused on that.

Some people message me on the Internet, and they say:

“Like, Jacob, where’s your secret army to overthrow the government?”

And I just tell them:

“Well, I don’t have one! And I don’t know why you’re asking me about my secret army, if you want me to have a secret army. I don’t have one. But why are you asking me on the Internet? And do you not find that this activity of recruiting people, getting our message out there, is valuable activity?”

I think it is valuable activity. That’s what I’m going to be focusing on.

In regards to Atomwaffen, I don’t know any of the real particulars of what was happening with them, with satanism and federal agents entrapping them and all that. I know more or less about it, but only vaguely. I know what happened. I remember when I first encountered Atomwaffen, which was back on the Iron March form, I had a very bad impression of them, because I just thought from the start, calling your group attack atomic weapons in German was just a very strange thing for an American group to do, having the nuclear logo, all these kind of things. So I was always confused by it.

But then obviously, all the unfolding tragedy in regards to what happened, all that’s what really turned me off. But I don’t know whether or not it was founded by bad actors originally. If they just tolerated bad actors, what happened? I know the original founder Brandon Russell went to jail, so probably he was just somebody that tolerated all this and it all just went to hell!

But then again, I don’t know. That’s, that would just be a guess for me, really. I don’t know the specifics. I know a lot of people know a lot more about that.

Mark Collett: I did an interview with a few people about this. I mean, when I look at groups like Atomwaffen, I just see them as just complete loons, sort of at best case scenario, you’ve got loons, at worst case scenario, you’ve got feds. And everything in between is basically just sort of the scum of our movement, sort of drawn to weird groups like that embrace things such as you know, they were heavily tied up with that Satanist group, The Order of Nine Angles, etcetera. Some of them were involved with sexual abuse and other absolutely abhorrent stuff like that.

And eventually they were prescribed as a terrorist group in the UK. They never existed in the UK, and I don’t believe they exist anymore. But they’re absolutely not a group that anyone with any sort of, well, I’ve never met anyone who’s a credible actor or anyone at all who’s shilled from there. Kind of, to me, when I see a group like that, and there’s nobody sort of who’s behind a group like that. And everybody who’s a sensible person is like, stay a mile away from that group.

[25:39]

And for me, as soon as I saw them and heard the stupid name, it sort of sets your antennae wiggling because you kind of think, who’s actually behind this and what’s the point of them? What are they going to achieve? Etcetera.

But moving on from that, I don’t want to spend the whole show sort of discussing freaks and weirdos. But with your situation, you guys, you’re not hiding behind your computer screens. You don’t have a silly name, or a daft logo. You’re not Satanists. You guys walk into court, you wear suit, shirts and ties, you look very smart, you come out of court, your heads are held high. People like, obviously, Joel, very good optics, etcetera. Because some of the people in my chat seem really impressed by everything you guys are doing, and some of them think are obviously a little bit more iffy about your optics.

Now, you do actually come out there, you very open that you’re National Socialists, but you present yourselves in a very approachable, clean cut, almost desirable manner.

So when you came out of court, you guys look fantastic! You know, you don’t look like weirdos. You don’t look like freaks. If the public are expecting some sort of dweebs, oddities, you know, freak show parading outside of court, they get the absolute opposite of that. I mean, you guys also look like Australian Chad males. Do you ever find that the public have got a disconnect between what they might believe somebody who calls themselves a National Socialist would look like and the way that you guys present yourselves, the way you guys articulate your arguments, and the fact that you are so clean cut, and approachable when people see you?

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I think we’ve got a good balance of the kind of street radicalism and protests in regards to putting on the black uniform and the masks, and a good balance of the more kind of bourgeois system politics. But that only really comes out when it comes we’re going into court, and that’s appropriate time to be wearing the suit and obviously defending our legal rights.

So I can understand why people are sceptical in regards to, … It’s a very, very stark look, what we’ve chose in regards to wearing all black and wearing the masks. I understand a lot of people prefer a more traditional kind of political look in terms of a conservative look, where maybe you wear a suit and tie or something smart casual or things like that. But we really wanted to differentiate ourselves from the rest of the Right insofar as we are radicals and that we’re street protesters. Like, we’re the only Right-wing group in Australia that really protests consistently, like we’re a protest group. The Left have their equivalents. They’ve got their socialist and communist groups, they’ve got their environmentalist groups and all that. The Right-wing will only really come out. They’re not organised. They’ll come out for rallies occasionally, whether it be anti-transgender ones or occasionally. What are they? I can’t even recall what they really protest about. They don’t protest here as much as I’m sure they do in other countries. We want to differentiate ourselves from the rest of the Right. And come up with a new, well, it’s not really a new image, but a different image from the rest of the Right. So we chose black as the colour because that’s the tradition of fascism and National Socialism in Anglo-sphere countries, particularly the blackshirt movement in Great Britain.

And obviously it harkens back to the Italians as well, their blackshirts, the SS in Germany. We just thought that black was the most appropriate colour for our movement.

And then the masks, on one level they’re practical, but they’re also symbolic. And it’s fashion. People like masks, [chuckling] whether I know a lot of people don’t like masks because of what happened during Covid [chuckling] and I understand that, but people still like masks and you know, when it’s appropriate. And I think that radical street demonstrations is an appropriate time to wear masks. So hopefully people can get over that.

But yeah, it’s practical because it obviously protects the identities of people who are demonstrating for our beliefs. Because there’s large swathes of Leftists in this country that feel that they have the right to destroy people’s lives based on their political views. And very many unscrupulous people will aid them in that, whether it be employers, banks, all these institutions are more than willing to aid these people in their activism, not really activism, but just their harassment of nationalist activists. So it protects the identities of people like that. So it’s got a practical function.

But also it’s got a symbolic function insofar as when we’re going to demonstrate it’s not about our individual identities as activists. We’re not there to be seen, we’re there for our political message to be seen. And when you put on the mask, you represent the political idea rather than yourself as an individual, your ego, your individual identity. You become a National Socialist, you become that Black Shirt activist, and you become part of the collective of people that are there to support the one person that has the mask off, whether it be me or Joel or Thomas, and that is differentiated from the rest of the group and who has something to say. So it’s symbolic, and it’s practical. That’s why we have the uniformity. Nonetheless. If people want to do different types of optics, would that optics work in the UK? My preliminary guess would be no. I probably wouldn’t do it.

But I think that it’s been very successful in Australia. I think most people now seeing all the success we’ve had over the years would probably agree, yes, it has been successful here in Australia.

So people can be sceptical anyway, I understand, people have different tastes in terms of what they want to see from a political group. But I still think that there is space for what we’re doing here in Australia and there’s space for people to do other things if they want to present a more kind of traditional political face like you guys are doing in the UK, we have no problem with that.

[33:26]

Mark Collett: See, I’m not suggesting, … Look, I’ve read a lot of different theories from different people about how to advance nationalism. And I’ve read the Rockwell theory. The Rockwell theory is that if you do things that are slightly more edgy and slightly more outrageous, you stand out from the pack, people notice you and you grow amongst a radical and dedicated audience. And that is a legitimate point to make. And I’ve also heard the theory that if you basically tone everything down and cuck on your policies, you get to power.

Now, as I see it, neither of those two options have led to anyone coming to power in the West. You could argue that someone like Marine Le Pen is close to power, or the AfD are close to power, but if you look at what they’ve ceeded in order to get where they have, they no longer hold on to the political points that they had when they started out. And I’m a firm believer that if you get to power and you hold power for the sake of power, but you’ve given up on everything that you believed in when you started that journey toward power, there was no point in making that journey in the first place. It’s an absolute waste of everybody’s time.

So, for example if you founded a nationalist group and you got people elected, and those people then ended up voting for diversity and inclusion in their elected positions just so they could further that the organisation and be more acceptable, what would be the point of the organisation existing? The organisation shouldn’t exist. It’s a waste of time. So I do acknowledge what some people say, that you guys may be scary, you might put people off, but also I’ve seen these appeasers go down the route of selling everything out, dropping all their opinions, kicking people out because they say the wrong thing. And that hasn’t exactly borne fruit either. You know, then you end up in a situation where you’re in a Nigel Farage type place. And yeah, Nigel Farage has got some MP’s, but he’s not in power and he’s saying some of the right things and he’s built a very large and successful populist movement, but he hasn’t yet attained power. And if he did get to power, with all of the caveats and all of the compromises, would he actually be able to turn around the demographic problem? And this is an age old debate, so I’m not knocking what you’re doing, I’m just asking why you’re doing it, so you can explain it to my audience, who are kind of split on it. You know, don’t think I’m digging at you. The fact of the matter is there are different approaches.

And if people look at your group and they want to understand the fruit born from your tree, you only have to look at your recent Whiteman Fight Back event. And that went viral. People all over the world saw that.

I mean, if somebody had said to you guys, right, we’re going to give you that degree of advertising, but you’re going to pay us for it, you guys wouldn’t have been able to raise that money in probably 100 years to get that much publicity from one event. You couldn’t have bought that kind of publicity unless you were like George Soros or Blackrock or the government themselves.

So what you’re doing by branding yourself in that way is you’re creating a kind of outrage that forces the press to cover you, that gives you a level of publicity that you wouldn’t otherwise get if you were just a micro party that played by their rules. So I do understand the logic behind it and I’m not saying what’s right or wrong because as I said, as of yet, in the Western world, there hasn’t been a nationalist party that is yet to get to power. And arguably, if you class people like Giorgia Meloni as nationalists, when they got to power, they were so watered down that they just carried on letting migrants in anyway.

So the whole exercise was a complete waste of time! Because if you’re going to get to power and you can’t do what you wanted to do, it’s all irrelevant. It was all just pointless.

As I said, I’m not knocking it, I’m just sort of asking you so my audience can hear how you do things.

And I think what you did was striking. Now, whether it will win over the masses or not is a different thing. But has anything ever won over the masses other than football, beer and takeaway?

Jacob Hersant: That is a good point. Yeah. Well, surprisingly, I think Australian opinion is coming around to our position, as far as they can go. Like, obviously the average Boomer or Gen-Xer isn’t ready to talk about Adolf Hitler.

But I remember previously where before this kind of last year or two of activism, we never were seeing really support from the public, but now just the centre Right and just the whole Right in general kind of have a begrudging respect for us and will come out and kind of defend us.

And I think part of that is just because of how intelligent we’ve been with what battles we’ve chosen to take up. We’ve gone after issues where it’s just a win-win for us and that any publicity we get from it is going to make us look good. The one we did with, I wasn’t around yet because I was on bail conditions. I wasn’t involved in the activism at that time. I was banned from seeing everyone. But that’s a thing I can talk about later. But the Destroy Pedo Freaks, one where obviously that was activism against transgenders.

[40:15]

So it was a let women speak rally, and they, the activists showed up and were protesting it with a giant banner that said Destroy Pedo Freaks.

So obviously, with a banner like that, practically everyone agrees with what it says, but it’s still a radical message when you really think about it. Destroy Pedo Freaks But considering our elite is inundated with paedophiles and people that enable paedophiles, transgenders and all that. But when they publicize it, and they go:

“Look at these terrible people!”

The average Right-winger goes and says:

“Well, I want to destroy pedo freaks. What’s the issue?”

And then, obviously, this most recent one that you brought up, Corowa, we were there protesting the fact that the biggest employer in that town has been bought out by international finance and all the locals have been fired and they’re bringing in foreign labour to replace them. So any publicity we get for that, for standing up for locals, for something that is like, this egregious crime against their community is good, and they’ve given us all that publicity, and we’ve looked good while doing it, and we’ve got such radical look to us.

But when we actually go, what we’re doing with our radical, you know, presenting that radical face and that radical look, every activism we do is for the most reasonable thing, and it actually makes us look good. We’re doing the PR work that we need to do to get our ideals across, not by watering down our ideals or anything like that. But by going for those particular issues at the perfect time that make us look good.

So it’s becoming increasingly easy for us to get our message across because of how bad the government is treating our population, how much they are destroying our country. I don’t think we necessarily need to be on the back foot anymore. The government’s, the one’s that are on the back foot, they’ve got the responsibility of ruling over the country and they’re disintegrating it. We’re just in never ending decline. Everything’s being destroyed. We’re being replaced in all of our towns. We’re less wealthy. People are less happy.

There’s a lot of problems, and we don’t need to apologise for our views anymore. People thought that in the 1980s and 1990s, the things, things were a lot better. There was obviously National Socialists and White nationalists back then that were railing on because they knew what was coming. But most people couldn’t see that. People do understand it now. People do understand what’s going on with the decline of our civilisation, the attacks on our race. People understand it.

So I think that kind of message of radicalism and that message of strength that we give out is going to be increasingly successful. And it was interesting what you were talking about in regards to, no nationalist party has taken power since the Second World War. And I think a lot of people forget that they get very wedded to their own particular idea of how we can succeed. They get kind of myopic and they think that all, the only way that’s going to work is their way. I don’t think we really need to be that kind of fixed in our view of what can be successful. And I think there can be many strategies going on at once in many different countries. I think would be fools to think that what we’re doing in Australia needs to be replicated in a different country. It’d probably be good in some countries. It’d probably not be so good in the jurisdictions, among other nationalities.

I think what you said about movements giving up their ideals and then basically wasting all the effort because they’ve engaged in electioneering, they’ve put so much money into it, so much effort, so much time, only to do nothing. Like you said, Georgia Meloni, I think that’s true. The problem with the cuckservatives and all that is they’ve been in and out of power since the Second World War, and all they’ve done is aid and abet the worst aspects of our enemies the Left. And we haven’t ever been in power as National Socialists, as explicit, … Well, I guess since the Second World War, we still had a kind of inertia of White nationalism, but not what we would call White nationalists today. People that are serious racists and that see a kind of a need for racial solidarity and base their politics solely on that.

So we haven’t been to power, but nonetheless there’s been successful movements like Golden Dawn before they got arrested, and that was egregious what happened to them. Just so unjust, what happened to the leadership of Golden Dawn. But before that happened, they were the third biggest party in Greece. I think increasingly radical parties like that are going to be more successful. I think Greece was just facing such a terrible time before, what we’re facing now in the West.

But I think all across the West, I think things are going to start to look more like how Greece was during austerity. I think things are going to look more like how Weimar Germany looked, and that people are going to look to radical nationalist solutions. Whether that’s explicit National Socialism or not, I can’t tell you. But in Australia, we’re going to be doing that’s what we’re doing.

[47:08]

Mark Collett: No, as I said, I find it an interesting debate, and I do look at this from a point of view of what are you trying to achieve as well? You know, not everything is about trying to achieve electoral victory.

Now, if you said to me:

“Mark, if you’re trying to achieve electoral victory, how would you go about it?”

Well, there’s only one chance of any party achieving electoral victory in the UK, and that’s the Reform Party. So you would have to go into that party, you’d have to go deep undercover, you’d have to say everything they wanted you to say, and you’d have to try and get yourself into a position where you were standing in a Parliamentary seat, where you would win, and then you could go mask off when you got in Parliament. That would be a potential way forward, which is really the only potential way forward for a young nationalist who wants to win a Parliamentary seat.

Now, there are other objectives.

So the group that I lead, Patriotic Alternative, we are a community building group, we raise awareness and we’re an indigenous advocacy group. So we, at the moment, have just raised 15,000 pounds, which would probably be about 30,000 Australian dollars, for political prisoners. And we are distributing that money to the families of people who have been sent to jail because they protested against the murders that took place in Southport.

So there are different, … Not every group has to be the same. And what you do and the way you go about what you do is often built around your objectives.

Now, if your objectives are to be a party that sweeps to power and wins a record majority, you’re probably going to go about things in a different way to if you’re trying to get young men into healthy behavioural patterns, or if you’re trying to build a community, or if you’re trying to raise money for political prisoners, or if you’re trying to just shift the Overton Window. You know, there are nationalist groups out there that exist solely to have sort of intellectual conferences, to hold debates, to publish books. And I’m not saying there is a one size fits all way to do things. And I certainly think you have captured the attention of Australians.

And I think one of the things about what you do that’s interesting is you go out there and you probably have slogans, publicity material and campaign headlines that most normal Australians would agree with. So if you’re calling sort of paedophiles freaks and saying:

“Look, we need these people off our streets!”

Most Australians are going to agree with that. And ironically, you’re probably the only group that’s saying that, which sends a real powerful message to the Australian people that the only people that are going to speak their language are guys walking down the street dressed in black who have to wear face masks, because otherwise the Left will dox them and try and ruin their lives.

And I do think that in itself sends a powerful political message as a form of protest. And as I said, I think there’s a lot of different things that can be achieved through different methods. And I do admire the fact that you are young, I admire the fact that you are doing things exactly how you want to do them, and that you are not bending to society.

And I do think that’s an interesting point, because I’m just going to throw this at you. See, people expect nationalists to always bend. We have to conform, we have to meet people halfway, we have to compromise. But the Left never compromise! The Left never meet people halfway. You know, if the Left want to do Drag Queen Story Hour, if they want to sell, you know, puberty blockers to kids, if they want children being brought up with all manner of degenerates being brought into their schools, they want children being taken to mosques, sat in front of imams with their shoes off, in order to pray, in order to say Islamic prayers. All of this diversity, inclusion, LGBT, it’s all pushed on, children. It’s all done at 100 miles an hour, and they never compromise! It’s always them at, you know, at 100%. And they’ve been pushing like this for years.

The only people that ever really compromise or ever really go down the route of sort of letting go of things are basically nationalists, Conservatives, or for want of a sort of an umbrella term, sort of the Right-wing.

So if you look at every standpoint Conservatives have made over the last 50 years, they’ve eventually given up on those standpoints and slipped towards the Left.

However, every standpoint that the Left has taken over the past 50 years, they clung onto regardless of public opinion, and eventually they’ve got their own way.

And when you look at that, it’s depressing. But it also kind of sends a message to maybe if Conservatives and nationalists in the past hadn’t been so quick to compromise, we’d be in a better position today.

[53:05]

Jacob Hersant: Yes, well, that’s true. Where we’ve got the idea of just being completely immovable in terms of our principles, or me in particular, is Mein Kampf. Adolf Hitler talks explicitly about how you have to be uncompromising in your, in your kind of founding principles, and that once those are set in stone, your founding principles are set in stone. They cannot be changed. You have to stay by those principles, because you need there to be permanence, you need there to be staying power. And people need to know what they’re fighting for and what they’re propagating. Because if it’s changing every year, what your ideals are, then people can’t really gain kind of veterancy in that, in fighting for those ideals.

Because if you start, maybe you get, let’s take a concrete example of Trump. Maybe you join that Make America Great Again movement based on what Trump was saying:

“Lock her up! Lock Hillary Clinton up!”

What else was he saying? Build a wall. All these kind of things.

So this is what you’re fighting for. These are the concrete things that you want to be achieved. But then when he gets into power, he immediately compromises on that. Hillary Clinton is still at liberty, as everyone knows. I think there is a wall. I heard conflicting things, that there is a wall. But nonetheless, the southern border is practically open. And millions of foreigners are pouring over the southern US border. So none of that has been achieved.

And that’s why you have things like you mentioned earlier, the 18 month syndrome, that people get involved in politics, they get discouraged because either, they don’t see enough progress or the founding reasons that they got involved in that particular group have been discarded, and they’re no longer fighting for what they originally got involved in.

But Hitler says, you need to figure out what your ideals are, what you’re actually fighting for. You need to be honest about them, and you need to just stick by them. And that’s what we’ve done. Even when we were small, even when it was just me. But we said what our core ideas are like Australia for the Whiteman. We’re never going to water that down. That’s our belief. And everyone understands when you see a person, Australian National Socialist, that means Australia for the Whiteman, that’s not going to change. People don’t have that with the rest of the Right.

If you look at Trump, does it mean build a wall? Does it mean actually protect our borders? Does it mean lock up Hillary? You never know! People that are more kind of amorphous like that, and they don’t have a concrete position that they stick to, you don’t know what you’re fighting for. If you’re involved in that group, you don’t know what they believe, you don’t know what they’re going to do. And that creates confusion and frustration.

So I think Hitler was completely correct about the need to be immovable on those core principles. I think we need to be immovable on our ideals. Australia for the Whiteman! White revolution is the only solution! I boiled it down to all these little slogans, Whiteman fight back! We need to be immovable on these kind of things.

But then when it comes to strategies, I think there’s many things that we can be doing and to circle it back to what we were talking about previously, there’s many, many different things that we can do. And it behooves us to have a holistic mindset. We need people that are intellectuals. We need people that are running book clubs, we need people that are running publishing houses We need people that are running intellectual websites.

At the same time, we need people that are trying to do electioneering and things thinking like that. We need movement comedians. I’m sure a lot of people see all the trolling that goes on and all the memes. We need people that are entertaining in that kind of way. We need people that are being street protesters. I think the people that are really going to be effective in this time are people that can not get caught up on their own little particular taste in activism. What they think is the best kind of human activity, we should be engaging in. And that can take a bird’s eye view and look holistically at everything that’s happening and go:

“All of this is valuable, all of this is advancing our cause!”

Because there’s so many different realms of humanity activity that we need to be engaging in. And most people aren’t going to be universal polymath geniuses that can delve in every kind of thing. But we got to have that mindset that we are glad that other people are doing those kind of work, doing that work that we aren’t particularly suited, we don’t have the temperament for.

Mark Collett: That’s certainly a very interesting perspective. And I suppose they can take everything from a man, but they can’t take away what’s in your heart. That’s something that you have to give.

And if you give that up freely and you’re happy to part with that’s on your head, it’s not on theirs. So I suppose, you know, really, if you were to go to jail, you would go to jail as a free man, because you’ve held on to all of the things that are in your heart. You’ve refused to cede any ground, and you can go there with your head held high. You know, I think that’s a very interesting perspective.

And when I look at some of the people who’ve been sent to jail in the UK, I see them in the same way. One short, final question before we go into the second hour of the show and we answer everyone’s questions. We’re going to read the Superchat soon. If you haven’t sent a donation you want to contribute to the show, please do consider sending one. There’s still another hour of the show to go.

But, Jacob, if you do go to jail, do you think you will see a wider wave of support? Do you think people will see you as a Martyr?

Because I’ll tell you this is the way I see it. I’m going to be brutally honest with you here. I don’t think the vast majority of Australians are going to come running to your side and defend you, but I do think the majority of Australians would think it was wrong for you to go to jail for simply raising your arm in the air.

And I think there’s a huge sense of injustice around these things. And we’ve recently seen this in the UK with the anti-immigrant protests and some of the people getting a bit rambunctious at those protests. So what you tend to see is if somebody who is sort of Right-wing and they manage to step over the line in some small, arbitrary manner, they get the full force of the law thrown at them. Whereas if you’re a Leftist and you do that, you’re given a pass.

So you’ll have a Left-wing mob pull down a statue and dump it in a river and it’s “social justice”. And the court overturns any sort of notion of it being criminal damage, it’s just social justice.

Whereas if you’re a White guy and you put your arm in the air, you’re actually going to go to jail for putting your arm in the air.

And I do think that whilst you might not get everybody on Australia behind you and wanting to join your organisation, I do think there’s going to be a huge, huge number of people who think what’s being done to you is fundamentally unfair and fundamentally against the ideals of freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

[1:01:40]

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, I think it’s another situation where we’re just in a win-win situation in regards to publicity of this, it’s going to be massive publicity, but it can only be good publicity because it’s making what is our core population that we want to convince over to our ideals, obviously, the White population of Australia. And to obviously the White population of the world because it’s so interconnected with the Internet, but in particular the White Australian population.

And on the whole, like you said, people actually do sympathize with our movement in this fight. And that’s what we need to keep doing. That’s what we’ve been doing, where it’s like they see an issue, whether it be Drag Queen Story Hour or free speech, all these kind of things. And we want the White Australian public to look at these issues and they go:

“Why am I agreeing with the Nazis again, against the government?”

That’s what we need to do over and over again! And that’s what we’ve been so smart at, in Australia particularly. But I’m facing nothing like what the UK political prisoners are facing. What is happening there is just egregious. Like, it is insane! People shouldn’t worry about me like they worry about the what’s happening to the people in the UK. I’m not facing two years, like, for stickers, like, what happened to Sam Melia. I’m not facing eight year sentences like what happened to the National Action guys, which was just insanity! Such an injustice what happened, in my opinion. I think what they got jailed for was just insane! I don’t think it constituted terrorism at all! I thought it was just political activism, and that they were just unjustly imprisoned.

And the if I get jailed, obviously, after all these appeal things, two months in jail really is not like, that’s a holiday, in my opinion. I’ll be in solitary confinement, so I’ll just be allowed to read books, write things, write poetry. I like to write poetry. So people don’t need to worry about me in regards to that. And I’m a political activist. I understand that. I agree with George Lincoln Rockwell when he said “the path to the palace leads through the dungeons”, that if we are going to be serious about our ideals, we’re going to draw flak from the system, we’re going to be attacked by the system and we’re going to have to accept that if you’re standing on a battlefield, a political battlefield, you’re going to have your enemy attack you. They’re going to be trying to, … I’m being completely metaphorical here. I’m using this as a metaphor for our politics. Obviously, we’re not on a literal battlefield fighting our enemies. But we’re in a political battlefield. And these people are obviously going to try their best to make sure that their army wins and that our army is destroyed. So I’m more than willing to go to prison.

The other thing is, I know a lot of people ask me about donating to the legal cause. I do not need donations at all because I’ve been in prison for this, so I’ll get Legal Aid. The taxpayer is going to be paying for that.

So there are so many more National Socialists and White nationalists all across the world that need your money. I do not need your money in this fight. And my lawyers, even if they weren’t getting Legal Aid, they said they believe in free speech, they believe in this particular case. So they’re willing to do a pro-bono, which for people that don’t know legalese, that just means that they’re willing to do it for free. They’re willing to provide legal representation for free.

But I think we have in this fight in particular, free speech is such an important issue for us, and it is such a popular issue for us because people are sick of the censorship. They’re sick of what’s called “wokeness”. They’re sick of just the egregious censorship, the moral policing for the worst these degenerates, like, these scum, these people that are morally policing us and making it so we can’t even call women, women, we can’t complain about immigration. This is actually very popular, us standing up for free speech.

And another important thing, what you were saying is that I could have my head held high. And I did have my head held high when I was defending myself against these hostile journalists and things like that. And they really don’t know how to respond to that, because they want me to be there and apologetic:

“I’m so sorry that I gave a gesture. I’m so sorry. Like, I just, please don’t hurt me!”

[1:07:21]

But when you go there and you have your head held high and you have the courage of your convictions, and you say:

“No, this law is invalid. What I gave was an honourable salute. There’s no problem. This is my beliefs!”

That kind of, that throws them off. They don’t know really how to do it, how to kind of paint you, and they have to just basically misrepresent what’s actually happening. Like, The Herald Sun is a newspaper in Melbourne, and they took a photo of me just looking. I was just not smiling at one point, and then they took a photo of me smiling and they took a photo of me not smiling. And they’re like:

“Nazi has his smile wiped off his face because he got convicted!”

[chuckling]

So they have to just rely on complete falsehoods and things like that. I think journalists are becoming more cognizant of the fact that nationalists can’t just hang themselves, aren’t hanging themselves anymore. We’re not making ourselves look like fools. And then they’re realizing that and they’re like:

“Oh, we can’t present them accurately now because that’s not working anymore. Every time we present them accurately, it only strengthens their position.”

So I think what you said is definitely right, but I’ll just reiterate. Yeah, I think what’s happening with the political prisoners in Britain is so much more important. I think they need so much more support than I do in this fight, because Australia, we just do not have the viciousness that the British establishment has to its White population. Not to say that there isn’t injustice here, there isn’t viciousness or anything, but it is not the equivalent of what the British are facing. And I think the British particularly need the support of all White people all around the world, especially other Anglo Saxons in America and New Zealand and Australia and Canada. You know, don’t forget Canada. [chuckling] We all need to support you guys. I think that’s where people’s support really needs to go.

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. Well, let’s do some of these Superchats and, well, not some of them. Let’s do all of these Superchats.

And if you want a Superchat, there’s still time tonight. Open Borders for Israel gave $5. Thanks so much. Said:

“Hail Jacob. A true Aussie nationalist. Mark, like everywhere else in the West, the jewish lobby is incredibly powerful here. Both play both sides of politics. Brenton Sanderson writes great articles on the jewish war on White Australia and The Occidental Observer.”

Well, thank you so much! Well, I’ll check that out. Dsallen7 gave $15. Thank you so much! And said:

“As an American, I feel like Australia is more openly oppressive and tyrannical in the hard power sense than the US. Maybe it’s because White Australians still have a stronger and more cohesive ethnic identity than US Whites. Whatever the case, I wish Jacob the best in fighting this evil.”

Yeah, I mean, it’s really weird because Australia, from a British perspective, is sort of a super based place. Brits think in Australia, you guys are sort of the manly guys. You have the right to do what you want. No one messes with you. I think most Brits would find it kind of weird to think of Australians sort of having restrictions on speech because you’re basically seen by others in the Anglo-sphere as sort of a very White, masculine nation.

Jacob Hersant: Well, we have the same jurisprudence and the same system as Britain has, but we also have a tradition of obviously convicts here.

So we’re a convict colony initially. And that obviously such a long history of that, having convicts and things like that, it doesn’t just wash away. We do not have any kind of tradition of libertarianism or freedom in the sense of American tradition here at all! As I was talking about earlier, the right to political communication here is only implied by the fact that we have a liberal, democratic constitution. We don’t have affirmative rights here, we don’t have a freedom of speech like the Americans have freedom of association and all these kind of things. We have nothing like that.

Every time that our politicians try to put in an equivalent, there’s never any support from the two major parties to do it. It never gets done. I think people have a always “Greener somewhere else”. I think people have rose coloured glasses when they look over to Australia. We really have the same problems as every other Western country. We are having our country systematically destroyed just like every other, not every other White country, but all the major White countries. Britain, America, Canada, South Africa, New Zealand, Germany, France, Spain, Britain, Ireland, everywhere. We’re having the exact same problem. So if people are looking to us in terms of the society for a better situation, we do not have it. I can guarantee you that.

In fact, race replacement here is probably worse considering we have such a small population and so much land. At least with places like Germany and Britain and America to a lesser degree, they have such dense populations and such big populations for small land and such inertia in terms of how big the population is there, that they can’t be replaced as quickly as New Zealand and Australia are being replaced.

So we are being demographically replaced so much quicker than countries like Germany and Britain. Britain had their floodgates open so much earlier than we did in Australia in the 1970s and we’re still in a terrible position. I think people shouldn’t look to us and think that we’re some sort of larrikins and therefore we’re more based. I’m telling you, we have just the exact same problems with Leftists, the same problems with White apathy, the same problems with cuckservatism. It’s more or less the same here.

[1:14:46]

Mark Collett: Look, I don’t doubt that. I think people do look at things with rose tinted spectacles. I think there are better places in the world. I think Eastern Europe’s better.

But the problems there are getting worse. I think that probably the worst in terms of out and out mass immigration is probably Germany. I was reading a couple of articles in a German paper the other day and one of them was like:

“Oh, the German government is deporting five illegal migrants.”

And then the next article was like:

“The German government has just signed a deal with Kenya, a trade agreement that involves 250,000 Kenyans settling in Germany as part of the trade agreement.”

And you’re just like:

“Oh, God!”

All these people are sort of celebrating these sort of small gains by the AfD and five migrants being deported.

But then, on the other hand, legally, the German government is bringing in a quarter of a million Kenyans. I always see Germany as one of those places where that they beat them harder for obvious reasons. Jagdeep Jano gave $5. Thanks so much. And said:

“Jacob is great. Would be nice to see him on more of Joel and Blair’s streams. Really enjoyed the last one. PS Jacob looks like Mark’s little brother. Or his son.”

Yeah. You actually are young enough to be my son. How depressing is that? [laughing] God, if I’d have a kid at 19, he could be you. That is weird! God, how time flies. What I’d give to be 25 again, Jacob, I’ll tell you that. Shlomophobe gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

“Throwing you a salute at the forbidden angle.”

Thank you very much. Kronos gave $15.

Thank you very much. And said:

“This may be something that you may have covered during the talk, but I am under the firm belief that to ensure our survival, we must all unite, not be separate as American, European, and Australian, but as a people under attack.”

Mark Collett: Yeah. What do you think to this? Because there seems to be, … So we’ve talked a little bit about the optics debate, but there does seem to be this issue where some people say:

“Look, we shouldn’t use the term ‘White’. You know, White is a term that we shouldn’t use. We should use terms like English, Australian, American.”

You know, White is a term that is generally used by the Left to attack us. We should use our unique ethnicities to our advantage.

So, for example you guys should be the, I don’t know, the Australian Rights Association or something, and here in Britain should be kind of like the English Indigenous Society. You know, these are just names I’m throwing out there.

But then some people say:

“No! We are all White people. We’re all of European descent. We’re all of shared ancestry and stock somewhere down the line. And we should be standing together against this threat that threatens us all.”

What’s your position on that?

Jacob Hersant: I can see both points of view, and I think that we really can do both. I don’t understand why it needs to be one or the other unless people are wanting to kind of throw the race stuff away. Because I can be an Australian and I can be a Whiteman. I can be both. And I can recognise that I have interests in both things. I think we have a hierarchy of kind of particular interests. I have more of an interest in looking after my particular family, because they’re my family.

But at the same time, I have an interest in my larger extended family and then in my ethnicity and then in my racial group, and then finally to the whole of humanity. We don’t really face fully threats to the whole of humanity in reality. But conceivably, if, say, there was an alien invasion or something like extraterrestrials came, people would unite around our humanists because there would be an external threat.

But at the same time, we are right now facing a racial threat. Our enemies explicitly say that they are after the White race. And even if they didn’t explicitly say it, we can deduce it from what is happening. We know what their agenda is. They’re attacking us as Whites in every single major White country. I can understand, maybe places like Latvia and Lithuania, maybe they’re doing okay right now. They’ve probably got the same problems in terms of decadence, but in terms of race replacement, they’re nowhere near as bad, as far as I know. Maybe that will change in the next decade or so, or places like Poland. I understand they’re not as bad. But every major historical world changing nationality of the White race, the United States, Germany, Britain, Spain, France, Australia, all these countries, we’re being attacked.

So we need to unite as Whites against this anti-White threat.

At the same time, we shouldn’t get caught up in kind of saying:

“Okay, we are only Whites!”

Like, I understand, we are Australians. We’re Americans. We still need to be nationalists in that sense. We don’t need to throw away everything in terms of our particular ethnicities, our particular cultures, our particular languages. We still should value these things. They’re good things. At the same time, we shouldn’t throw away the race stuff. And in Australia in particular, we have a tradition of race, explicit racism based on the fact that we’re a colonial power that came and displaced the original inhabitants through settler colonialism.

And it’s the same with America and Australia. So part of our national identity is the fact that we’re White men. And the slogan “Australia for the Whiteman” is not something that we came up with. It’s actually was a mainstream position. It was the headline of one of our most famous newspapers called The Bulletin, which national poets, celebrated poets of our nation, like Henry Lawson and Banjo Patterson, contributed to the headline, was Australia for the Whiteman.

So we just returned, we brought that back to contemporary politics. But that is what our national identity is about. We are White. We had the White Australia Policy. We conceived ourselves as Australians and as White men, as White Australians. And trying to separate that is insane, in my opinion.

[1:22:22]

But, yeah, I think people get, like, kind of they can’t see eye to eye and they can’t come to a reasonable position of respecting nationalism and racism. And they go:

“Oh, you’re a racist! That means that you want everyone to be mixed together. You want Greeks to get you want all the Greeks to move to Britain and you want all the Portuguese to go live in Germany!”

And that’s not what we’re saying. We are saying that we have a common interest insofar as we are all Whites. We have a genetic interest in looking after each other. But we can do that in separate nations and in separate developments with different languages. We can do both.

And at the same time, people, maybe the more racist they’ll be, not so kind to people that are putting forward the national case of their particular nation. Putting that forward, although I don’t have as much sympathy, like, I’m more of a racist myself. I think that’s really what we need for this era.

Mark Collett: Thank you. Sorry, ItWasMadeUp. Gave $20. Thank you so much! And he said:

“Great guest. Jacob is very knowledgeable and speaks so well. He’s a great advocate for our people. It’s awful the way a so-called liberal democracy is persecuting him for his political beliefs.”

Well, thank you so much! DerCherusker gave $5. Thank you very much. And said:

“The awakening is on the rise. All the best and all the support to the national revolutionary comrades, keep on fighting and never give in. De camp is devata alla dinga. Struggle is the father of all things.”

Thank you so much! ThinRedLine gives $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

“NS Network, is that the same organisation that Thomas Sewell, Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell are members of?”

Jacob Hersant: Yes. Yeah, it is. There’s two organisations, what was called European Australian Movement. I think it’s going to be rebranded into something else. But, yeah, National Socialist Network. It’s the same sphere. It’s the same kind of like, movement and community. Yeah, all of us are like, I’m friends, personal friends with all those people. All of us live in Melbourne. We all support each other. Yes, that is true.

Mark Collett: Okay. Arab Social Nationalists gave $8.80. Thank you so much! Said:

“Jacob. I congratulate you for sticking to National Socialism, a worldview which is objectively true despite the squeamishness, embarrassment, and pearl clutching of its less robust nationalist minds. How do you deal with those who reject National Socialism and argue against its relevance to modern White nationalism?”

Jacob Hersant: Well, how would I argue for National Socialism against non, kind of just a more vague White nationalism? I just argue, …

Mark Collett: Yeah. How? Because obviously what some people would say is White nationalism in itself would probably be more saleable.

So say you had an organisation called, you know what did you say your slogan was? Australia for the Whiteman. Yeah.

If you just had kind of if you had an organisation called I don’t know, Australia for the Whiteman and you have the National Socialist Network. Some people would argue that an organisation called Australia for the Whiteman would intrinsically do better without the National Socialist tag attached to it. You know, that’s really what he’s saying. Do you think that would be more successful or less successful? If you’re holding on to the National Socialism, why would you? What’s your reason for holding on to that?

Jacob Hersant: Well, the primary reason for me is that I am a National Socialist. When I was learning about all kinds of White nationalism and stuff when I was a teenager, I came to the realisation that Adolf Hitler was right and that his ideals are what I believe in. I know a lot of people that are very pragmatic will be like, okay, but to me, that is a very important thing, that it’s what I actually believe. I believe in National Socialism, and that is why I’m a National Socialist. Like, I’m honest about my views. And then we can move to the practical argument after that.

I don’t think it is necessarily more or less pragmatic to present yourself as National Socialism or White nationalism because the reason each of them are persecuted are universal to both of the things, both of the ideologies. National Socialism is attacked because it’s racist. It’s nationalistic. Yeah, well, those are the main reasons that they’re racist, nationalistic, militaristic.

[1:27:55]

And the fact is the vast majority of White nationalists are the same, and they’re going to be attacked all the same, [chuckling] and they’re going to be called. This is a practical argument. I get it. And people don’t like this argument, but they are going to be called Nazis anyway. And I would say more or less rightly, because how many White nationalists have we genuinely met who will be you know, maybe behind closed doors, who would say in the Second World War they did not want Hitler to win? Who would honestly say that? I’ve never met somebody that genuinely in good faith would say to me:

“Yeah, I’m glad that Great Britain and the United States won and the Soviet Union won the war against Germany.”

And we’re going to have to reckon with the fact that when we are talking to the public and we’re talking to our enemies and we’re debating with people, they’re going to bring up the Second World War, because the Second World War is such an important event. It was the biggest war in world history! And people just believe that we can sidestep that and just say:

“I don’t want to talk about the Second World War!”

We have to! We have to! [chuckling] It’s like, if people are going to bring it up, we’re going to have to talk about the Second World War.

And I think we’re going to have to necessarily say that even if you were a White nationalist and you don’t subscribe to all the things in regards to National Socialism, you’re going to have to say:

“Well, I do support, yeah, I do wish Germany had won the war because we would be living in a better world because of it.”

And by necessarily saying that, you’re just going to be called a Nazi anyway.

So I don’t think it’s necessarily more practical to call yourself a White nationalist compared to a National Socialist.

Yeah, I really don’t think that. In my opinion, in my estimation, I don’t think White nationalism is necessarily more sellable than the National Socialism is. I think, both of them are just as difficult to sell, considering there’s been a concerted effort against both of them, all the principles that underlie both of the ideology or particular ideologies. Yeah.

Why is Hitler hated? Why are the Nazis hated? They hated because they were nationalists! Because they were traditional family values. They valued fertility. They were against the degeneracy of today. They had a conception of race and racial solidarity. And we’re going to have to fight on those battlefields. We’re going to have to fight for these ideals, to normalise these ideals, regardless.

So it’s going to be a difficult struggle ahead, that is for sure.

Mark Collett: I think we can definitely all agree on that. Jagdeep Jane gave $5 thanks so much. Said:

“Jacob. I think Tom [Sewell] might have discussed this the other week. Will you set up some way for people outside Australia to donate to your organisation?”

Jacob Hersant: Yes, we do need to set up a way to donate. Right now it’s been difficult. Previous fundraisers have just been shut down. So it’s always kind of like a cat and mouse game. We’re always just trying our best to get up donations. Right now, we don’t need, well, we do need donations, but once it gets set up, you can obviously see, I’ll share it on my social media. The organisations will share it, Tom will share it.

But as I said, in regards to this legal case, I do not need fundraising. There are so many other causes that do need fundraising. So I recommend you, if you have money now and you itching to give it to people, give it to other efforts right now. And yeah, one day, sometime soon, we’ll have another way for people to donate if they want to donate to us particularly. But it’ll be for the organisation. It will be for our activities as an organisation, not for the legal defense, or anything like that.

Mark Collett: Okay, thank you very much. The Resident Baker gave $5. We got a one Odysee token thing.

I’m just going to read it out, but we’re not answer that. He says, Our Enemy Holocaust said:

“Our enemies will never, ever be appeased. There is no upside to compromising.”

Well, thank you so much! The Resident Baker gave $5. Thanks so much. Said:

“Another great guest, Mark. The recent activism undertaken by Jacob and the lads has been superb. I wish him all the best of luck in his fight with the anti-White system in Australia.”

Thank you so much! ThinRedLine gave Dollar 14. Thank you very much. Said:

“Great show. I really like the National Socialist Network.”

Thank you very much. $5 came from Kill Your TV. And he said:

“Jacob, recently you stated you like memes and other tomfoolery. Are you averse to someone taking your speeches and putting music to them?”

Jacob Hersant: I’m not adverse to anyone doing anything they want with my videos.

As far as I’m concerned, when I make a video and I put it on the Internet. It’s in the public domain. Do whatever you want with my videos. And even disseminate my videos, however you wish. You don’t have to credit me. It’s not about my individual identity as a person. It’s about the message and the words that I’m saying. So if like, I’m just so appreciative to anybody who wants to disseminate my content, whatever they want to do, you do whatever you want. Put music on it, put flashy graphics, do whatever you want. I’m more than happy for everyone to do whatever they want. Don’t credit me if you don’t want to. Do whatever. All of you given free rein over my public domain. I’m like, what’s that website that does the audiobooks where it’s like, “this is in the public domain”? LibriVox Recording. Like all my videos are like, LibriVox recordings are in the public domain! [loud laughing] You can just share them anywhere! Yeah. I’m just so grateful that people want to share my things. So of course you can do whatever you want with them.

[1:34:44]

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. Jagdeep Jano gave another $10. Thank you for your generosity tonight, my friend. He said:

“Hey, Mark, Steve Laws gave a great speech at the Homeland Party conference a few weeks ago. Do you support Steve and the Homeland Party? Do you suggest nationalists join them?”

No, do not join them. He can do whatever he wants.

But if you’re here on this stream and you’re listening to Jacob, Jacob’s basically saying, don’t cuck! Jacob’s saying:

“Don’t give in to the pressure to sell out!”

These clowns have got a handful of community councillors which are non-elected positions that they pretend are serious elected positions. And one of their community councillors, in order to keep his position, has already voted for diversity and inclusion on the council. So they had a vote and this supposed nationalist councilor voted in favour of diversity and inclusion.

At the end of the day, if you call yourself a nationalist party and you have the mildest toehold in power in Britain that you could possibly have, but you’re already voting for diversity and inclusion, then what’s the point in even existing? There’s none!

I mean, I can understand the arguments for some moderation, and I also understand the arguments that you’ve got to stick to your guns and hold on to your beliefs.

But if you’re talking about moderating, but you’re in fact just selling out as soon as you form an organisation, what’s the point in even existing? There isn’t any. If you want to be involved in an organisation like that, you can do, but there’s no point the people in that organisation keeping having a go at Nigel Farage and saying:

“Oh, Nigel sold out on this and Nigel’s done that. And the Reform Party, you couldn’t possibly vote for them because of this reason!”

When the organisation that they’re a part of is doing exactly the same thing as the people they criticise. Complete waste of time!

And if people are impressed by what Jacob said tonight, and people agree with what Jacob has said tonight, then those people couldn’t possibly want to be part of an organisation that sells out their beliefs. For what? Acceptance on a community council in some tiny little town in Scotland. Pointless. Absolutely pointless!

I mean, when I look at people in the movement today who are genuine heroes, who are people that you look up to and that you admire, then who do I think of? Well, I think of people like Jacob. He could go to jail for making a hand gesture. I think about people like Sam Melia serving a two year prison sentence for putting up stickers that were legal. I don’t think that anyone who sits with a bunch of liberals and endorses anti-White policies can be held up as a nationalist. And if Steve Laws wants to support that kind of nonsense, that’s up to him. You know, that’s on his head, that’s on his conscience. I’ve never sold people out in my life. I’m not going to start selling out.

Although I might have certain differences with people about optics. One of the key issues is this. If you call yourself a nationalist and you endorse the policies of replacement, if you endorse the policies of diversity and inclusion, which is just a series of code words for anti-White, you’re not one of us! It’s as simple as that. I don’t know if you’ve got anything to add to the idea of nationalists who call them, or people who call themselves nationalists voting for diversity and inclusion?

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, I don’t know a lot about the Homeland Party. I don’t know a lot about Steve Laws.

I’ve seen some of it on Twitter. Obviously what we’ve talked about on the stream, I always talk universally about my principles. Whether or not those principles apply to particular organisations or not is up for people to make their own judgement about. I have a lot of people message me, like personally DM me and they’ll ask:

“Is this video talking about this organisation? Are you complaining?”

I don’t complain about particular organisations unless they’re Australian, because I’m in Australia. I honestly don’t know. I have no idea about what you’re referring to in regards to what’s happening with the Homeland Party. With that sounds concerning to me, and I hope they can rectify that. I hope they can clean that up if that’s what’s happening. But I don’t know anything about other scenes other than what I see on the Internet. And I know from experience all the things that are said about my organisation from disgruntled people that have it out for us, that there’s a lot of people that say all kinds of crazy things about my organisation.

For example, like people say, you brought it up earlier about Satanism and Atomwaffen. People make accusations that we’re Satanists in our organisation. Like, they say, there’s a bunch of people that they claim we’re Satanist. They say:

“Joel Davis is a Satanist because he has a Baphomet tattoo on his arm from when he was an edgy teenager.”

But that’s not true. So I don’t know about the specifics of other countries political movements, what’s happening and all that kind of stuff. That’s why I talk universally.

And I just think people that are like you’re in Britain, so you can talk about what’s happening with the Homeland Party and you know about it, you can apply what I’ve said to them. I can’t make that judgement because I don’t know about the Homeland Party and I can’t verify what is happening there.

[1:41:45]

Mark Collett: Well, what I’ve reported to you has been reported in the press. There was a vote held on some community council, and their representative there voted for diversity inclusion. So it has been reported in the press, it’s been verified. They did that because they’re selling out.

I can tell you this as well. They won’t be supporting you. They won’t be supporting the kind of work you do they won’t be supporting political prisoners in the UK. They haven’t supported anyone in the UK that’s been arrested for protesting or for saying things on social media. I can tell you now, they are not the real deal! And the people who set them up are people that everyone should steer well clear of, especially the ones who have admitted in court to basically committing what are classed as acts of terrorism, but the police won’t even act against them. When young lads are getting dragged out of classrooms and genuine nationalists are getting arrested for the same thing and being given five years in jail. Anyone that manages to get away with that kind of stuff when they’ve admitted to doing those things in court just glows in the dark. I’m telling you that for free.

Poytyt gave $25. Thank you so much! And just said “donation”.

Well, thank you for your kind donation. ThinRedLine gave a dollar and said:

“Numbers.”

Which takes us to $148.80. So thank you so much for rounding that up to that figure. Wife Waffen gave $8. Thank you so much! And said:

“Have a great week.”

And Sally gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

“Thank you, Mark and Jacob.”

Thank you very much. ScaredyCat gave $4. Thank you so much! And said:

“Hi, Mark and Jacob. You have striking courage, knowing you might be imprisoned by tyrants who have stolen your government, yet standing up against them for your own people’s honour and fair treatment.”

Thank you so much! ScaredyCat gave another $4. Thank you so much! Said:

“Hi, Jacob and Mark again. The whole world, including Muslims, should be fighting for two things. Stop non-White immigration to Europe and to nations founded by children of Europe and stop the upcoming attack on Iran.”

What do you think about that? Because this has been a big issue in the sort of American dissident Right.

The idea that whilst Trump is somebody who appeals intrinsically to sort of White working class voters, he is the most likely candidate to lead America into an unjust war against Iran. Is that something that you guys discuss, or are you guys not really interested in American politics or global politics? Do you just focus on the immediate issues that affect White Australians?

Jacob Hersant: Politically we focus on the issues that affect White Australians, obviously. Insofar as Australia, we don’t have our agency to decide whether or not a war is declared. We’re, for all practical purposes, America’s sidekick now. And if there is a war against Iran, I’m telling you, we’ll have a small, a very, very small amount of soldiers relative to the US that will come and accompany them and just be there. We don’t have a serious military in Australia. It’s been completely gutted and destroyed over the decades, to the point where it is just a joke! Our military is a complete joke!

So we don’t practically, we’re not going to be doing practical activism in regards to stopping a war. I am interested in world politics, but I’m not so interested in Middle East geopolitics and American foreign policy. I do agree that I don’t think it’s in anyone’s interest to go to war with Iran other than Israel. And therefore we should oppose it.

But, yeah, it’s not something that really gets me out of bed in the morning, as it were.

Mark Collett: No. I’ve sort of noticed that, generally speaking, you sort of get more discussion of issues pertaining to Israel, etcetera, from the American Right.

And I think they are more involved in that, as of the British Right, simply because our respective countries tend to be more involved when there are wars in the Middle East.

So you have the conflict in Iraq, you have the conflict in Afghanistan, you had the attempt to start a conflict in Syria, and right now British and American troops are already stationed in the Gulf preparing to defend Israel at any cost. And I think that does affect America to a much greater degree than any other country, but it also, to a lesser degree, quite implicitly affects the UK.

But I don’t think Australia, New Zealand, Canada or the other Anglo-sphere nations feel that kind of pressure the same way that America and the UK does. So I understand that you guys probably aren’t going to be as passionate about that particular issue.

MLG gave $25. Thank you so much! Said:

“Phenomenal guest. One of the best in the movement, in my opinion. Will have to watch a replay. Keep up your amazing work, gentlemen.”

Well, thank you so much for that generous Superchat. And we’ve got one Superchat left. And this is from Stix Sent Me Here, and he gave $14. Thank you so much! Said:

“Jacob! I messaged you a while ago on Telegram asking for a way to support your work. Is there now a way to support your work?”

[1:47:34]

Jacob Hersant: In terms of donations? There isn’t a donation link up yet, but I’ll tell someone to set it up. Someone needs to set it up. But we’re always so under the pump. We were planning today, well, actually yesterday, because it’s 05:00 am here. So I had like maybe a four hour sleep before this, [chuckling] before this interview. But yesterday we were planning and we’ve got a lot of things coming up, so I’ll have to palm it off to someone. I’m so busy. I’m always under the pump. So I wish I could tell you there was someone, like there was a certain time I was going to set up and this is where you could donate, but someone else is going to have to organise it, unfortunately.

Mark Collett: Thank you. ScaredyCat gave another $5. Thank you so much! Said:

“Hi third time, Jacob and Mark. Half a century ago, my elder cousins, who were teenagers in their twenties, Muslims in Bangladesh, talked of their friend Hitler. I asked my mum why. She said his parents admired Adolf.”

This is something I’m going to ask you because obviously you’ve said you’re a National Socialist, etcetera. National Socialists have historically worked with people from other ethnic groups. So obviously Adolf Hitler had great admiration for certain ethnic groups. He spoke with them positively. Famously, he was far more sort of friendly, shook the hand of Jesse Owens at the Olympics, whereas the Americans wouldn’t acknowledge him because he was black. George Lincoln Rockwell famously worked with different black American groups. At one point, he worked with Malcolm X. How do you feel about that? As somebody who’s sort of a National Socialist, I know that some Australian nationalists are completely against working with any sort of non-Whites, but you keep speaking very sort of admiringly of Hitler. George Lincoln Rockwell. They did work with non-White groups who were aligned with their objectives or who also believed in the separation of races. What’s your opinion on that?

Jacob Hersant: Well, I do share the opinion that we shouldn’t work with any non-Whites that are direct threat to our nationality insofar as they’ve come and invaded the Australian continent and they’re coming and living here.

So all the immigrants, I think, by virtue of coming here have become our political opposition, because fundamentally, our guiding principle is Australia for the Whiteman. And these people are yellows, browns and blacks, and we can’t really ally with them. We can’t water down that principle.

At the same time, our principle being Australia for the Whiteman doesn’t mean that we can’t work with other races internationally. And considering we’re on the Internet, where we can connect to every other person that has an Internet connection in the world, that means we can work with other races. But they need to be in other parts, their respective parts of the world. I got no problem with working with Arabs that are in the Middle East. I got no problem with working with Africans when they’re in Africa. I got no problem with that.

But then again, it needs to be practical as well. Is there really any practical reason why the National Socialist Network needs to ally with Kenyan nationalists or something like that? There really isn’t any kind of practical reason we need to do that.

So I think if we had state power and we actually had to have a foreign policy, yeah, we’d be okay with working with other races. But we don’t have state power. There’s not really anything we can do. And our principles state that these immigrants that have been brought in by the jews, need to be returned means that we can’t really ally with these people, otherwise we’re undermining that core principle which defines our struggle.

Mark Collett: But you do sort of have sympathy for other racial groups that are sort of victims of the same global multicultural homogenised world. For example I mean, I have great sympathy with the Palestinian people, or I have sympathy with Lebanese families that at the moment are being terrorized by Israel. Do you have sympathy with those people or?

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I have sympathy with people that are nationalists, regardless of what race they are. And I just expect that, like, I expect every race to put themselves first. I would just think it’s kind of silly any races that actually want to kind of serve White people and they want to put their people last and serve our sort of thing, things like that’s race treason to me.

So there’s a respect I have for people that are standing up for their own race because that’s literally what we’re doing. I think it is a universal principle that we can support everywhere.

But at the same time, I also recognise that they’re not us, that these other races, the yellows, the browns, the blacks, they’re not us. They’re not the same. And my sympathy doesn’t go out to them as much as it does to Whites. I have a particular care for my own race, for my own nationality.

And in regards to the particular cases you’ve given, like the Lebanese and the Palestinians, I do sympathize with them insofar as they’re being attacked by our common enemy, which is the jews. Yeah, I do sympathize with them, and I think they are being subjected to some pretty heinous crimes.

[1:54:06]

Mark Collett: See, I think it’s always an interesting point to make, you see, because I suppose this is a bit of a difference I have with some people. I don’t regard myself as a racist. I don’t regard myself as somebody who intrinsically dislikes people of other racial groups. I regard myself as somebody who wants to see a genuinely multicultural world.

However, I want every country to be a homogenous monoculture. So I want, you know, England to be for the English, Scotland to be for the Scottish, Germany to be for the Germans, you know, Japan for the Japanese. I don’t wish any ill on these people. I’ve always found that that kind of approach is far more understandable.

And from what I’ve, you know, from what I see of sort of National Socialism, as in German National Socialism, pre-Second World War, that’s pretty much in line with what they believed. And Hitler had obviously warm friendships with different ethno-nationalists from around the world who of different racial backgrounds.

Jacob Hersant: Well, I don’t see racism as being hatred. I see just racism, … When I say “racist”, I say, I mean it in so far as someone, like what someone would call a nationalist. So a nationalist is a “nationist”. I think of racism as racist.

So I think there’s two components of racism. The first is obviously acknowledging that race exists, what people would call “race realism”, acknowledging that race is a biological reality and that it affects human behaviour and human activity, human society.

And then paired with that, being a racist is putting your particular race first, and advancing your race as a political identity. So being a racist is someone that puts your race first. I wouldn’t say racism is necessarily hating other races. Just like being a nationalist doesn’t necessarily mean that you hate every other nation. And, yeah, in fact, we can admire other races for what they actually have given the world and what they have contributed to history.

Mark Collett: That’s a very thoughtful answer.

I mean, I tend to sort of characterize myself as an ethno-nationalist. And I do believe it that we need to preserve the White race as a whole. The White race needs to stand together under the same umbrella. But amongst the White race, our individual ethnicities do also need to be preserved. And people often say to me about my views:

“Well, why are you concerned what happens in Sweden? We need to think about what’s happening here in the UK, et cetera, et cetera.”

I think that my issue is I feel that the same dark forces that are coming for us, our people, are coming for every other group of Europeans or all other peoples of European descent. So I think we do need to stand together.

But the term “racist”, I think has a number of negative connotations. And I also think in the UK, if you described yourself as a racist, that might even be against the law now.

I don’t think I’ve ever described myself as a racist, but I’ve always described myself as an ethno-nationalist or somebody who is a White racialist in the terms that I want the best for my people, but not to the detriment of others.

And I think that’s really what makes a thoughtful, ethnocentric person stand out from kind of like the Hollywood caricature, is that sort of I don’t want any form of supremacy. I don’t want to dominate other people or colonise other people. I just want my people to be allowed to flourish and I want all others to be allowed to flourish.

One last question I’ve got for you. This is always an interesting thing. Always an interesting question from an Australian point of view. Obviously, Australia was founded by White men, but there were people in Australia before the White men arrived. How would you deal with Aboriginals? Would you just give them their own land and separate them from your people? What sort of claim do you think they have? As somebody who’s obviously deeply invested in your own people, what sort of investment would you grant them?

Jacob Hersant: Well, honestly, like, if the honest answer is, I think that they should basically be given their own reservations and should be completely and utterly separated from White Australians, and that should be strictly enforced. They realistically, they cannot be given their own state. They do not have the capacity to form a state at all! I think they should just basically be treated like. And this is going to upset a lot of people! But they should be treated like protected wildlife. Because that’s how they live! They live as animal, as hunter gatherers, basically. Their whole mythology is about animals and all these things. They’ve just got a poetic imagination. They conceive as everything, as animals, animal powers, all these kind of things. They should just be left to live as they’ve lived for tens of thousands of years. And there needs to be separation. They need to be allowed to just live how they’ve lived, and they need to just leave. We need to leave them alone and they need to leave us alone.

Mark Collett: You know what? I don’t think that’s a controversial point. And do you know why I don’t think it’s a controversial point? I think it’ll be treated as a controversial point. I think people might pull this up and make it out to be a controversial point, but actually it isn’t. And the reason it isn’t is because there are places in the world, like North Sentinel island, where there are tribes that have never been introduced to the outside world, and it is illegal to go and interfere with those tribes. It’s illegal to go there and try and take them Christianity or healthcare or medical care, or a written language. And they are treated, as you say, as a completely separate entity.

And I’ve got to say, with what you’re suggesting, I think that would be better for them. I think the Aboriginals are better surrounded and enveloped by their own culture, their own way of life, their own heritage, and listening to their own myths, worshipping their own gods, than they are being integrated into a Western society in which they can never fit in.

And in many ways, although what you would set what you’re saying here will be decried and called cruel, etcetera. It’s actually a more workable solution than the much more cruel liberal solution of expecting them to unfortunately fit in with a highly technological, advanced Western society, which isn’t in their interests. They never developed. And when you see Aboriginals pulled into that kind of society, it leads to horrors for them as a people. And I have seen original, I have seen Aboriginal people living in their natural sort of tribal environment. Although it’s not something I’d want for me. I do respect those who carry on their traditions. They’re different to my traditions, but I respect that more than I respect the liberal desire to turn them into us when they’re never going to be us. I think that’s a very good point.

But anyway, we’ve reached the end of the show. We’ve got another $5 from. Ok, Three Wire. Who gave what? $5 and a little thumbs up. Well, thank you so much!

Jacob, it’s been absolutely fascinating talking to you tonight. Do you want to give yourself a brief outro and tell everyone where they can find you?

Jacob Hersant: The best platforms to follow me on Telegram so you can find me. Just search up Jacob Hersant. You’ll find me. I got banned on X or Twitter. But somebody, I don’t know who he is. He might be some handsome individual, runs an account called Mark Hersant, and he re-uploads my content.

So you can follow, you can get my video content there. You can find me on Gab as well. Gab’s probably the safest platform I’m on. I presume I’ll get Apple banned and Android store banned on Telegram eventually. The person who’s re-uploading my content on Twitter probably will get banned again eventually.

So if you want somewhere to always follow me, go follow me on Gab. Jacob Hersant. Thank you for having me on, Mark. Like, I really appreciate you giving me your platform and asking those thoughtful questions. And I wish all British nationalists success in this struggle for the survival of our people.

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! Well, that brings us to the end of tonight’s show. I just want to thank Jacob for being here. It was really, really thought provoking interview and very, very interesting to hear a man who is so young, so committed and so unwavering in his desire to hold on to his beliefs and to not give in to the immense pressures being piled upon his young shoulders. And whether you agree with everything he says or not, I think you can definitely salute him for his commitment to his cause, no pun intended. And we wish him all the best with his legal struggles.

Anyway, I’d also like to thank everyone who donated so generously.

And finally, I’d like to thank everyone who stuck with the stream. Everyone who shared it, everyone who liked it. Everyone who’s part of our amazing community. I love you all. And we’re back. Same time next week for another episode of Patriotic Weekly Review. Thank you so much, everybody. Good night. I’ll see you all again soon. Love you all. See you next week.

[2:05:13]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/17/2024 = 434)

Mark Collett
4 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

1
0
MagicManintheSky
1 hour ago
Hail Hersant.

3
0
Abby Eagle
1 hour ago
At bus stops in Australia there is a sign with an iconic man with arm raised in a Roman salute with the words “Hail Bus” or “Hail Driver”.

2
0
ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Hail Victory

2
0
Archipelago Woes
34 minutes ago
Heil Hersant!

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
2 hours ago
Thanks Mark and Jacob is a great guest blood and Honour 1488 o/

1
0

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Romans for Jacob o///

1
0

@EnglishRose
2 hours ago
Thank you for a great stream and a great guest.

1
0

@dsallen7
2 hours ago
Great stream today. Jacob is an engaging and intelligent speaker.

1
0
danzimmons
2 hours ago
going to watch the great Tollah

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago
tru dat I meant to say

@Gundobar
2 hours ago
Heil Frens!

@dsallen7
2 hours ago
o/

14Reasons
2 hours ago
cya

The Resident Baker
2 hours ago
o/

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
Thanks Mark, thanks Joel, o/

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
o/

danzimmons
2 hours ago
°/

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@6079SmithW
right

danzimmons
2 hours ago
or stay sober

@SerenaJB
2 hours ago
Great guest.

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
try dat, but use it as its supposed to be used

danzimmons
2 hours ago
don’t sniff glue kidz M’kay

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
and that will never change. those primitives have always done this and always will. but let’s starve ourselves out for random primitives who would chop us all up, eat us and then use our skulls for a voodoo ritual

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
great stream, great chat

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago
when they discovered our alcohol and glue, it really fkd them.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
true

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
We have to admit how embarrassing n cringe the altruism of the white man is. These primitive people cannot be helped

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
They are only something to observe

danzimmons
2 hours ago
same thing they tried N Canada

14Reasons
2 hours ago
they’re like Africans. they never evolved

@JDogPitler
2 hours ago
that’s not Joel. That’s Jacob

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
They are who they are and thats ok. Just never interfere with them

14Reasons
2 hours ago
the way they STILL try to get them civilized is abusive to them. and no, that’s not cucking. they should be just left alone

@LanesHasGains
2 hours ago
their own culture is eating their own kids

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@6079SmithW
glue will fuck anyone up

Callaghan
2 hours ago
14

@Shlomophobe
2 hours ago
o/

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago
Tollah, giz a rap?

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheAyatollah
boss

danzimmons
2 hours ago
Tollah! see you then

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
as if every “starvation crisis” is the responsibility of Whitey. I just heard of some 130 million Africans in some sort of alleged starvation crisis and then somehow we’re obligated to give them endless aid. those primitives will ALWAYS be starving because it’s what THEY DO. primitives

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
Its like aliens interfering with Humans. Dont interfere with Africa

The Ayatollah
2 hours ago
I’m live here once this finishes:

Lampshade Denier
2 hours ago
Very handsome.

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
correct. they don’t seem to understand that the world is based of struggle, competition, extreme violence. that is nature, and nature always wins. this world that we live in is not natural, an it will come to and end faster than they think.

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
Just leave them be

danzimmons
2 hours ago
juxtaposition any abo with any European

14Reasons
2 hours ago
it would be falsely perceived as controversial because they will be depicted as they’re just like us. they’re the opposite of us racially and in our nature

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
were*

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
they wandering around naked eating worms before we arrived in Australia

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
The unique expressions of humanity aren’t interchangeable within one society

danzimmons
2 hours ago
Don’t be rama rama

14Reasons
2 hours ago
their average intelligence is profoundly low. some of the lowest on earth. they aren’t like modern human Whites in the slightest

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago
Based Jacob

@ssanwaerter
2 hours ago
People that have never met any abos will seethe. But if you’ve ever met a full blooded abo you know hes right.

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
I hear they sleep on the roads lol

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@Charles
inferiority complex

14Reasons
2 hours ago
that’s fair. they’re extremely primitive. he’s right

The Awakened Saxon
2 hours ago
The creator of The Impartial Truth is of Iranian ethnicity and is a conviction National Socialist.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
every parasite eventually dies when they kill the host

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
altruism, morality. crippling in the face of genocide. may kind weak illusions and delusions fall to dust and be humiliated for their false notions of a peaceful and loving world

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Perhaps they lash out due to a inferiority complex?

@Ral9010NatSoc
2 hours ago
You can call yourself an ethno-nationalists, but they will still call you a racist.

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
Yes, it works well

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
The label is only used when it’s against us

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago
and yet they wanna dominate us. morality will really be the end of us. it’s our biggest weakness.

@Ral9010NatSoc
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
It’s about disarming jewish slander. A racists is someone who’s racially aware, to them.

14Reasons
2 hours ago
like I have said, they’re already going after some Asian nations. one is Japan. Japan has followed our trajectory ‘hand in hand’ since the 60s. minus the mass invasion. but the trickle has begun there. the games of Non Japanese subversion is already very much alive and in swing

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
I try to use “in group preference” in lieu of “racist”

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
It’s a label that really doesnt even make sense when really considering it

Joe Marsh
2 hours ago
Toffee come on my stream Monday lar

Ethno Nationalist
2 hours ago
Mark Germany had a homogeneous country at that time

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
AH did not have a blind hatred of all other races. He understood the fundamental problem was Jewish hegemony. The Jewish elite play the races off against each other, this is why they fund Tommy to focus solely on Islam

danzimmons
2 hours ago
Big Joe!

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
gtsy laa

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Why weren’t they brought back and settled in Liberia? Look at this mess we are left with wtf dude

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
oy that’s too much hate thoughts you lot

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Racially Conscious

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
We can’t win over any race brainwashed normies with the term “racist”

14Reasons
2 hours ago
“racism” is just White ethnocentrism in what it’s perceived as

Joe Marsh
2 hours ago
If we described ourselves as racist in the UK they would arrest us guaranteed

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@Charles
3 months is being generous

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
We are told everyone can do that except us of course

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
ello

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
We are fpr true peace and harmony

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago
well said

danzimmons
2 hours ago
even if you haaate them still use them as propaganda against our mutual enemy.

ok3wire
2 hours ago
$5.00

Ethno Nationalist
2 hours ago
Muslims in there own countries ok not when they in our countries

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
I hope good for Black Americans but it’s not our concern

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
That’s healthy and respectable

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
once you get to know me, you will realize i am indeed a cunt. no hard feeling towards you. its my nature

Callaghan
2 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
0/

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
could’ve just posted your channel link instead of being a C***

14Reasons
2 hours ago
prior to racism in the UK , there was a time they call it : “RACIALIST”

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Essentially, yes

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Yes and call Florida ‘New Africa”. Im sure it would fall into chaos within 3 months and they would be back to blaming us for everything

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Hello mate.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
most Palestinians want to be left alone in Palastine.

14Reasons
2 hours ago
racism is just an Anti White slur

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago
Is a racist someone who dislikes other races, or just someone who acknowledges the differences between the races.

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago
Mark has sympathy for the palestinians. but if the roles were reversed. they wouldn’t have sympathy for us, they would rejoice.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@Charles
give the blacks one state n isolate them all there. Florida maybe

Better Based Than Erased
2 hours ago
But do the Palestinians have sympathy for Indigenous Europeans and want their future (European) assured – not so sure..

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
Africa can do as they please but stay the hell away from our lands

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
mornin fella o/

Callaghan
2 hours ago
Hail Jacob 0/

Chuck Gerety
2 hours ago
We aren’t against anyone as much as we are just for ourselves

Natec0997
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
just want to see it in my lifetime

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
i am actually awesome af

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
f**ks sake you seem like a cool fella

Ethno Nationalist
2 hours ago
Well said Jacob Race First o/

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
you dont ignore it all, you have been commenting on the videos ive uploaded liar lol

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
We are familiar, but I’ll just ignore any of that type of behavior. Thanks though

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
what do you think?

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
whats your channel, I’ll sub

14Reasons
2 hours ago
yes he worked with other ethnic groups that weren’t in his own country because it was a homogenous Germany

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@6079SmithW
yeah well said lol

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
hince why i made the comment

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
well said Toffee

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
yes i do, his commented on my channel several times

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
how is that a helpful comment? You dont even know who the person who asked the question is

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
What kind of ball? sports ball?

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Natec0997
agreed We Will Win

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
Ok, cool. Thanks.

Natec0997
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
I’m convinced that we can defeat them. It is going to be a long road ahead but we’ll get there

The Crucible 01
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
an irl activist someone who has ball unlike you

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
Australian Nationalist from the same group as Joel Davis

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
some based Australian

danzimmons
2 hours ago
Jacob Hersant

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
Australian Nationalist

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Natec0997
wise and the right approach

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
Just got here, can anyone fill me in on who the guest is please?

@6079SmithW
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
hello

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@JackOLanturn
hello and welcome

danzimmons
2 hours ago
certified psychopaths

Natec0997
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
I have saved the anger for later. Now, I have decided to fight back with our propaganda

@JackOLanturn
2 hours ago
Hello everyone o/

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@danzimmons
yes

danzimmons
2 hours ago
poisoned their fecking food

danzimmons
2 hours ago
or more

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Natec0997
they killed at least a million Germans in the camps after the war

@david_smith
2 hours ago

@TonyGonzalez
Banking issues.

Natec0997
2 hours ago
Remember – we are dealing with an enemy who bombs children. And this didn’t start in middle east. They did the same to the German children even after they surrendered

Better Based Than Erased
2 hours ago
I’m suspicious of the Homeland founder – I believe he associated with the BNP membership list people- then he does forsakes PA at a most suspicious time almost designed to do maximum harm…

Reactionary Traditionalist
2 hours ago
What happened to Fraser Anning?

Natec0997
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
exactly

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Steve Laws glows in the dark

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Natec0997
The AI translations of AH are going viral on tiktok

@6079SmithW
3 hours ago
Has Steve Laws joined the H land party?

@SerenaJB
3 hours ago
Steve Laws is a good guy all the same.

Natec0997
3 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
one interesting phenomenon is that NS imagery and AH’s speeches have become very popular recently. The fact that my generation even admitted that AH had some “good policies” makes this even better. The moment we undermine the lies told about AH and NatSoc, the enemy loses.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
$1.00
Numbers

Better Based Than Erased
3 hours ago
Homeland – suspicious – designed to fail or keep people occupied. & if an (unikely) electoral miracle occurs become ukip lite as designed…

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
agreed a few thousand like him and we would win

danzimmons
3 hours ago
as we’re being outnumbered

danzimmons
3 hours ago
just like trump

danzimmons
3 hours ago
they’re just more stalling tactics

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
yea he’s a top young man

Poytyt
3 hours ago
$25.00
donation

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
agreed but it is clear that Jacob is a true idealist

the woodlander
3 hours ago

@6079SmithW
hi mate

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
Always acknowledge people who have contributed

14Reasons
3 hours ago
another traitor pretending to be based. sickening

@6079SmithW
3 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Hello Sir.

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@Natec0997
yes and there is no way of telling if he has or hadn’t

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
signed up to DEI

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
yes

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
anyone who shares Jacobs stuff should credit him. Respect to the lad for being so modest

@SerenaJB
3 hours ago
Oh dear.

the woodlander
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
boomer truth regime

Natec0997
3 hours ago

@14Reasons
Yes I know. He is very smart. My point is that a man like that must always have kids

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
yes there is a generational issue

danzimmons
3 hours ago
probably has to swat away the Stralian lass’s

the woodlander
3 hours ago
full out NS doesnt fly in the UK at the present, to many people fell for the propogander, but the younger generations are much more detached.

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@Natec0997
I didn’t say he hadnt. Murdoch is very strategically advanced. that’s all I’ll say

Natec0997
3 hours ago

@14Reasons
he really should. He must pass on his pro white instincts.

danzimmons
3 hours ago

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@danzimmons
bankers , Israel, the “new world orde”, those for malice and treachery

danzimmons
3 hours ago
bankster’s))))) won WW one & two, obviously

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@Natec0997
he’s not uncle old yet but I’d be real worried if he hasn’t had kids yet

Natec0997
3 hours ago

@14Reasons
uncle Tim Murdock has the best terms

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
which is why there are different groups

@6079SmithW
3 hours ago
caught a live one. Hello all.

danzimmons
3 hours ago
#its ok to be White…

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
good hashtag that #teamwhiteunite. ALL of us

14Reasons
3 hours ago
Noooo that’s literally an elite narrative about multi racial kumbaya under an alien attack wtf

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
Its whitepilling to see bright young Nationalists like Jacob doing great work and standing up for our race.

Callaghan
3 hours ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

danzimmons
3 hours ago
i am White.

14Reasons
3 hours ago
we are White but there is many different distinct variant s of White bloodlines and long standing legacies

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
White unity world wide

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
It’s pointless nitpicking. We are English AND we are white.

14Reasons
3 hours ago
I’d just call myself pro white

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
i want to win, n we won’t win with outright Austrian painter optics. I wish we could, but we can’t

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
looking at the world today it is difficult to say that the good guys won WWII

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago

@BlackwaterPark
A movement is born

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
^^

@BlackwaterPark
3 hours ago
Australian Chad Network

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@Carlota
it don’t matter . the way they’re playing that game with corrupting entire fields to be dominated by invaders is the inception phase of solidifying future power. like bloody browns in gas stations and ubers and taxis

Jagdeep Jano
3 hours ago
$10.00
Hey Mark, Steve Laws gave a great speech at the Home Lnd Party Conference a few weeks ago. Do you support Steve and the Home Lnd Party, led by your friend Ken, and do you suggest Nationalists join them?

@6079SmithW
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
o/

danzimmons
3 hours ago
every people have fought other people, we just happened to be the best

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@6079SmithW
evening kidda gtsy

14Reasons
3 hours ago

@Carlota
so they’re moving fast with the agenda. bastards

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
like links on the White chain

@6079SmithW
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Hello Toffee la

14Reasons
3 hours ago
every Western White nation we’re told all we did was enter Non White lands, subjugate and slaughter them. it is never that simple. it is immensely more intricate

14Reasons
3 hours ago
White European bones pre date so called native Americans. the evidence has already been confirmed. all we did was leave north america a very long time ago ..for some odd reason.maybe natural disasters and then CAME BACK

danzimmons
3 hours ago
exactly

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
It’s great being White

14Reasons
3 hours ago
“WHite Australia policy ”

Arab Social Nationalist
3 hours ago
All White people are under attack. Separation by White ethnicities is lunacy. The enemy views
White people as one, so White people’s defence should necessarily be unified.

14Reasons
3 hours ago
if you want to specify the phenotype of our people that’s fine too. but we all are white

14Reasons
3 hours ago
we are White. people saying we shouldn’t use White are retards

The Anglosphere
3 hours ago
We love the Anglosphere

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
true

danzimmons
3 hours ago
lol it’s true

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
I am your father Jacob

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
I’ve just realised who Jacob reminds me of! He looks a bit like Morrissey. That’s a compliment, i love Morrissey, he’s quite based

danzimmons
3 hours ago
“they” are obviously ramping up their replacement scheme

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
lmao, yes only slightly though

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
Hail the Anglosphere and all our White Countries! o/

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
I read recently that the UK is one of the most densely populated places on earth now. India level densely populated, but with slightly less poo in the streets

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
^^^

danzimmons
3 hours ago
^^^

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
Libertarianism is jewish poison

danzimmons
3 hours ago
do all the black power salute’s you please don’t you dare salute as a White man

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
The British criminals arrived in Australia and formed who we know as Australians

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@ItWasMadeUp
id rather we use our superior white intellect n be more sensible n tactical.

danzimmons
3 hours ago
it’s getting harder for normie’s to cope every day

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
If they are imprisoning you for your political beliefs, there comes a time when you have to stand up, or at least support the people that do.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
Hail Britain and the British people

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
The amount of hate towards our people is so obvious I don’t see how a normie cant see it at this point

Kill_Your_TV
3 hours ago
$5.00
Jacob, recently you stated you like memes and other “tomfoolery” are you averse to someone taking your speeches and putting music to them?

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@danzimmons
pointlessly throwing up the Romans has achieved nothing for Jacob

danzimmons
3 hours ago
be scared White man, never offend poc’s

danzimmons
3 hours ago
but being a scared pussy isn’t changing jack shite neither

@Toosoon
3 hours ago

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@Toosoon
fully agree. I’ve been, it wasn’t fun.

Ethno Nationalist
3 hours ago
Honour is a great thing

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Lawyers can be scumbags. There’s the occasional good one but you know what I mean

The Resident Baker
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Cracking show with Horus the other night, mate.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
$14.00
Great show, I really like NS network

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago

@CampsLindburgh
They had some crazy devices back in 1300

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
evening Si gtsy

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago

@CampsLindburgh
We can take note of the medevil torture time

the woodlander
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
evening mate

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
great show so far gents

@CampsLindburgh
3 hours ago
we need experts in physical punishments

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
The 1965 immigration act was a compromise and look where that lead us

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
EXACTLY JACOB

danzimmons
3 hours ago
obviously

@Toosoon
3 hours ago
I think going to jail is not noble, it’s stupid & to be avoided

danzimmons
3 hours ago
hostile journo’s ie activist

the woodlander
3 hours ago
very encouraging to see such a switched on 25 yr old

danzimmons
3 hours ago
bankster’s)))))

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
an honest lawyer a rare thing indeed

danzimmons
3 hours ago
it’s an attack by coward’s

@Carlota
3 hours ago
https://www.givesendgo.com/sammelia

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
It’s a battle alright just a different type of battle without swords in the traditional sense

@cheflad
3 hours ago
#FreeSam

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
#freeSam

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
a poet and a warrior what more can you be

danzimmons
3 hours ago
#FreeSam!

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@ourresidentbaker
nice one laa much appreciated

danzimmons
3 hours ago
remigration yesterday!

danzimmons
3 hours ago
then it’s too late

danzimmons
3 hours ago
we’ve seen what happens to virtue signaling anti racist’s already, they eventually get “enriched”

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Destroying statues because Brown people cant build civilization. The insanity of it goes without words

@CampsLindburgh
3 hours ago

@Charles
those are the kind of experts we need today

The Awakened Saxon
3 hours ago
100 percent Jacob – Never Compromise

danzimmons
3 hours ago
ask Sewell lol he’ll tell you the same

danzimmons
3 hours ago
°/

@HardR
3 hours ago
o/

danzimmons
3 hours ago
yeah of course but Jacob is fearless, 3 hots & a cot with time to read

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@danzimmons
apart from imprison him for a long time. He’s useless in jail, we want our active young lads at liberty not languishing in a cell.

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Have a clear definable outline beforehand that we never compromise on

danzimmons
3 hours ago
they’re using everything from planes too container ship’s

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago

@BritishGammon
exactly

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@BritishGammon
well said

@BritishGammon
3 hours ago
No point in having a wall if the gates are open

@cheflad
3 hours ago
now Trumps a dog on a Zionist Chain.

14Reasons
3 hours ago
there is no wall

danzimmons
3 hours ago
there’s nothing they can do to him to make him back down

danzimmons
3 hours ago
Jacobs basically made himself indestructible by the evil anti White regime

@cheflad
3 hours ago
well said Mark.

The Resident Baker
3 hours ago
$5.00
Another great guest Mark. The recent activism undertaken by Jacob and the lads has been superb. I wish him the best of luck in his fight with the anti-White system in Australia.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
we are common sense

danzimmons
3 hours ago
fecking system ngo’s against everything English

danzimmons
3 hours ago
f^ck cope not haaate lol

Arab Social Nationalist
3 hours ago
Good luck, when Reform get Hope Not Hate to vet their candidates

@cheflad
3 hours ago
Win hearts & minds

danzimmons
3 hours ago
percent It’s ok to be White

@GaelicNord
3 hours ago
Another great example of a reasonably message put out by nationalists that exposed the regime to come out of the woodwork was “Its ok to be White” It exposed them so bad. The message was so reasonable yet they lost their minds over it calling it “HATE!” & “RACISM!” etc. Lol.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
LOL

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@jagdeepjano
I actually donated to him when he got arrested

@frog.eyes
3 hours ago
“successful movements like…….. before they got arrested…” LOL

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
Even though we all face fundamentally the same situation all countries have their own particular circumstances

danzimmons
3 hours ago
should PA replicate Stralian WN tactics N the uk would it be possible

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
Destroy Paedo Freaks! is a great slogan.

Jagdeep Jano
3 hours ago
To my knowledge he is Thin Red Line . “Oy vey Tommy Robinson has been arrested everyone, we need your shekels to get him out again!!”

@frog.eyes
3 hours ago
ahh, the “it’s more problematic than ever” white pill. how quaint.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
I sAvi yemini still active ?

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
very good

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago

@jagdeepjano
aahh of course! I forgot about that little wrongun

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
Nigel Garbage, i like that

Jagdeep Jano
4 hours ago
Toffee, they have Avi Yemini, a Jew from Rebel Media

SublimeBraid
4 hours ago
Nigel Garbage is looking after Nigel Garbage.

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
He believes it’s all about “values”. He’s all about jews and Hindus, just like Tommy.

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
Farage doesn’t believe that White people have a right to be a majority in this country

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago
Ask Jacob if Australia has it’s own version of Tommy Robinson, a high profile fake kosher Nationalist type

HoloCough
4 hours ago
1
our enemies will never ever be appeased, there is no upside to compromising

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I agree

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
My issue is with clout chasers who are pretending to be based

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
Nationalism should be a broad church, and you need radicals who reject worries about optics.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@ItWasMadeUp
let a thousand flowers bloom

@ItWasMadeUp
4 hours ago
I think we need both types of NS org – ones like Jacobs and one’s like Mark’s. Best of both worlds.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Carlota
originally it was, the left first became environmentalists in the seventies

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago
Notice Tommy has been encouraging people not to wear masks at his upcoming demo. Wants people to doxx themselves in my opinion.

Reclaim
4 hours ago
wind-breaker nationalism o/

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@vengeance
thanks to you for stopping by

@vengeance
4 hours ago
cant tune in just wanted to say thanks to mark and patriotic alternative

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
He’s a real life hero

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago

@Charles
Dr Duke is the absolute GOAT

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
Yes typically its attractive people who gravitate to our points

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Carlota
this is their real religion

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Charles
indeed, he go elected as well

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
they all seem to be good looking guys

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
Duke was a very well spoken, articulate, handsome and reasonable man which appealed to normie Whites

@BlackwaterPark
4 hours ago
Need to found a group called “Australian Chad Males”.

Jagdeep Jano
4 hours ago
$5.00
Jacob, I think Tom might’ve discussed this the other week – will you set up some way for people outside Australia to donate to your organisation?

Norman
4 hours ago
The order of the nine Uncles

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
We are the good guys

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Satanism is absolutely wrong

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Charles
I like ythe conversation in the chat and you can learn a lot

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
I appreciate you responding to my comment

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Charles
true

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
When the leadership begin killing each other itis a bit of a problem

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
Yes they aren’t doing us any favors

@Bluenose
4 hours ago
Who was the jogger that was saluting behind Jacob when he gave a statement at the courthouse. Was he charged with doing that?

The Crucible 01
4 hours ago

@Lampshade_Denier
exactly

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
He’s too busy criticizing the men who actually do something.

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
Feds and children doing Satanism in the woods

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Charles
very wise

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
We have high standards and filter out the wacko morons

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@LanesHasGains
good thanks

The Crucible 01
4 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
then by all means start your own organization and run it the way you want it

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
$8.80
Jacob: I congratulate you for sticking to National Socialism, a worldview which is objectively true, despite the squeamishness, embarrassment and pearl-clutching of less robust nationalist minds. How do you deal with those who reject NS and argue against its relevance to modern White nationalism? \o

@BlackwaterPark
4 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Does seem to be the case a lot. Lay off booze and porn, get in shape, etc.

@LanesHasGains
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
yes

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
No, it doesn’t. People follow strong men.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Lampshade_Denier
lol true

@cheflad
4 hours ago
Joel is really charismatic.

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago
“milieu”…Joel’s favorite word

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
a good evening to you as well

@cheflad
4 hours ago
young people are the most threatened by Multiculturalism, look at the ADF vote in Germany, very popular with 18 to 25yr olds.

the woodlander
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
evening mate

@BlackwaterPark
4 hours ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hey ASN. Are you on Twitter nowadays?

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
I get dissapointed when we get dropouts.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Hardcore Aussie

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Hello Folks

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
$5.00
NS network is that the same as the organisation that Thomas Sewell, Joel Davis and Blair Cotrell are members of ?

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago

@BlackwaterPark
it should be a priority for all white Nationalists across the globe

@ItWasMadeUp
4 hours ago
I think it takes all sorts. Some orgs appeal to certain people, other approaches work better with others – let everyone do it their way, see what sticks.

@BlackwaterPark
4 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Having someone like Blair Cottrell in their movement probably got them to make fitness a priority.

Chief Moody
4 hours ago
Evening troops

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
I adore the Aussie chads.

@UltimateTruth
4 hours ago
Sewell’s group come across as Hollywood-style Nazis. Clownish and counterproductive. That’s just what the Jewish establishment likes to see. It puts off intelligent, high-value folk

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago
I’ve noticed the Aussie Nationalists tend to be in good shape a lot of British Nationalists need to exercise more

The Crucible 01
4 hours ago
Joel has changed a lot since the last he was on with mark, lol

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
I like the Aussies

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
It’s almost as if the liberals are the authoritarians

@ItWasMadeUp
4 hours ago
o/

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
In USA it might be a felony eventually to say White Lives Matter

Adamic Flesh
4 hours ago
^ this

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago
it’s just playing in to our enemies hands throwing up the Romans, it won’t bring more white people on to our side.

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
o/ (just waving to you all in the distance)

DerCherusker
4 hours ago
$5.00
The awakening is on the rise. All the best and all the support to all national-revolutionary comrades, keep on fighting and never give in. “Der Kampf ist der Vater aller Dinge”/”Struggle is the father of all things.”

@LanesHasGains
4 hours ago
it says Joel not Jacob

@MarkCollett

@ItWasMadeUp
4 hours ago
$20.00
Great guest – Jacob is very knowledgeable and speaks so well, he’s a great advocate for our people. It’s awful the way a so-called liberal ‘democracy’ is persecuting him for his political beliefs.

@Kronos
4 hours ago
$15.00
This may be something that you may have covered during the talk, but I am under the firm belief that to ensure our survival we must all unite, not be separate as American, European and Australian but as a people under attack.

@Shlomophobe
4 hours ago
$5.00
Throwing you a salute at the forbidden angle o/

@noreplacement
4 hours ago

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago

@Aunt-Sally
Hello! Will I be seeing you this weekend?

Jagdeep Jano
4 hours ago
$5.00
Jacob is great, would be nice to see him on more of Joel and Blair’s streams, really enjoyed the last one. PS – Jacob looks like Mark’s little brother, or son

SuzyWaffen
4 hours ago
Hit the fire button, guys!

@Aunt-Sally
4 hours ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hello you

spencer
4 hours ago
it says Joel not Jacob, on the stream

@MarkCollett

spencer
4 hours ago
o/

Eagle Pax Max
4 hours ago
Hello Chat

nonexistent
4 hours ago
o/

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
European people worldwide must be the best if they feel the need to constantly attack us. It’s not our fault their countries suck compared to ours.

@Aunt-Sally
4 hours ago
Evening folks, am off to an exercise class and will watch on catch up

Arab Social Nationalist
4 hours ago
Greetings goyim \o

@Cripticpickle
4 hours ago
heil o/

@Glen19
4 hours ago
The child brides is to keep the caste system together. lots of arranged marriages

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago

@Glen19
Go to Australia and do better. Otherwise, STFU.

Ethno Nationalist
4 hours ago
Hail Jacob Hail Victory to NSN o/

@noreplacement
4 hours ago
Heil Jacob

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago
Jacob is the man!!!!

Jon Snow
4 hours ago
HAIL JACOB HAIL NSN o/

DerCherusker
4 hours ago
Hail!

@Glen19
4 hours ago
Is he going to get Collett in jail? Sewell’s group are more like Hollywood Nazis

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago
Good evening everyone

the woodlander
4 hours ago

@EnglishRose
hi rose

the woodlander
4 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
evening rory

@EnglishRose
4 hours ago
Hello

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago
Good evening folks.

@Amalek61
4 hours ago
Hello

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

Ethno Nationalist
4 hours ago
Good evening our Folk 1488 o/

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
hello all

the woodlander
4 hours ago
lots of trees, lots of rain… dodgy signal tonight

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
We will survive and thrive better then ever

Parken
4 hours ago
Good evening

@SammichLubber
4 hours ago
Hello my fellow indigenous Europeans.

@Amalek61
4 hours ago
Hello Mark

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
Good evening.

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
USA is set for total destruction however the saving White Pill is that a unified,powerful, healthy and racially aware White ethnostate will arise afterwards

@dsallen7
5 hours ago
$15.00
As an American, I feel like Australia is more openly oppressive and tyrannical, in the “hard power” sense, than the US. Maybe it’s because White Australians still have a stronger and more cohesive ethnic identity than US Whites. Whatever the case, I wish Jacob the best in fighting this evil.

@ItWasMadeUp
6 hours ago
Great guest!

Open Borders for Israel
9 hours ago
$5.00
hail jacob! a true aussie nationalist! Mark – like everywhere else in the West, the Jewish lobby is incredibly powerful here, play both sides of politics…brentan sanderson writes great articles on the jewish war on white Australia at the occidental observer…

@filled_soda
17 hours ago
Jacob had me laughing out loud recently on Joel’s show, talking about “Hard c*nt” energy.

SteveOfWessex WP Sports
1 day ago
Jacob Hersant did nothing wrong o/

SteveOfWessex WP Sports
1 day ago
Hail

@MarkCollett
& chat o//

0
0

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 18579

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Mon, Oct 21, 2024 — Transcript now completed 125/125 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Added abo joke image.

Version 1: Thu, Oct 17, 2024 — Published post. Transcript completed so far = 75/125 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee comments (434).

Freedom of Speech – katana17

Ernst Zundel – My Life and Political Awakening – 1979 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel

My Life and Political Awakening

1979

Description

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

TRANSCRIPT

CONTENTS

“Who are you? Where are you from? What is your background? What was your development?”

02 I was Born Just at the Outbreak of the Wwii

04 Fire Bombing of Pforzheim, Our Neighbor City with 20,000 Killed

“Oh, that’s the front coming closer.”

04 Fire Bombing of Pforzheim, Our Neighbor City with 20,000 Killed

05 the Allied Occupation with the Rapes, the Looting, and Then the Starvation

06 the French Allowed US Only 850 Calories Per Day in Ration Coupons

07 We All Looked Like Kids from Bangladesh or Biafra

08 Father Comes Home a Broken Man from an American Pow Camp

“Papa is coming home!”

09 Zundel Graduates from Public School and Decides to Become an Artisan

“Well, this is what this boy is going to be. He’s going to be an artist.”

10 an Aptitude Test Declares Him as Being “Universally Talented”

“Oh yes, this boy has definite talents as an artist.”

“Universally talented! I could have become anything!”

“Well, but he wants to be an artist again.”

“There is no money, no survival in art in modern day Germany, which is in ruins. Let him learn a trade!”

11 Enrolled in a Three Year Apprenticeship Training Program as a Graphic Artist at Age 14

12 Completes His Apprenticeship with Flying Colours and Moves Osnabruck in North Germany

“Boy, across this hill there is a world to be conquered!”

13 Zundel is Told He Must Speak German!

“Zundel, you must understand that you must speak German here, not Swabian!”

14 German Magazines with Full Page Ads from the Us, Canada, Australia, Etc., Saying “Immigrants Wanted!”

“Immigrants wanted!”

“There’s a world to be conquered!”

15 Zundel Choses Canada Because It Looked Like Home in the Black Forest

“Boy, speak German!”

16 Arrives in Montreal Canada in the Fall of 1958, and Then to Toronto

“No problem. We will fund your job in no time.”

17 Gets His First Job in Canada as a Graphic Artist for Simpson Sears

“Impossible!”

“Ah! Just wait a minute. I have a German lady here. She will translate for you.”

“How is it possible that a young fellow of 18 could be so advanced?”

“Look, if he doesn’t believe me that I can do this kind of work, I’ll work for nothing! I’ll work for two, three days for nothing. I have my tools with me. And then he can see whether I can do the work or not!”

“Great! You can start tomorrow! First thing, 9 o’ clock in the morning.”

“Young man, you are hired!”

18 Getting Settled Down in Canada, with a High Paying Job, Learning English Every Day

19 Meets a Lovely Young Girl in Night Language School, Leading to Marriage and His First Son

“Boy, she’s gonna be my woman!”

20 Brings over His Mother for a Visit, Travels Around North America, Recession Hits and No Job or Money

“Ah well, I must bring my mother to this lovely land and pay back a little milk money.”

“Mon cherie, what are we gonna do?”

“You always wanted to go to the province of Quebec. I’d like to go be back amongst my own people too.”

21 Moves to Montreal and Starts Job Hunting at 21, but Becomes a Freelancer

“Well, the heck with this, here’s a perfect opportunity to become a freelance artist!”

“Mr. Zundel?”

“Oh well, I have a job for you.”

22 Starts to Learn French, and Business Succeeds, Puts a Down Payment on a Home

“Gee, if this is such a well paying trade, we could afford a house!”

23 Develops an Interest in Politics and Meets Adrien Arcand, the Hitler of Canada

24 Visits Europe and Contacts Many People to Further His Political Education

25 Enrols in University in Montreal to Study Political Science and History

26 Becomes a Public Speaker to Overcome Shyness

28 Becomes an Official Candidate, One of Seven

28 Becomes an Official Candidate, One of Seven

29 the Whole Exercise Only a Method to Gain Attention for My Cause

30 Germans Being Second Class Citizens in Canada

“Go to hell!”

31 a Live Interview Which was Broadcast to Europe in German

“Go and beat it!”

“But this is impossible, but you cannot say this!”

“Look, not only am I saying it and you are hearing it, but I’m also meaning it!”

“But this is so unusual!”

“Listen, I am living in Canada, in the land of unlimited opportunity.”

32 Received Only $105 in Donations for His Efforts to Help the Immigrant Community

33 Must Now Return to Business Life and Tend to Mending My Fences

“Well, I must now return to business life and tend to mending my fences there.”

34 Separatism by Communists Becomes Violent in Quebec

35 Discovered Indeed That There was a Conspiracy to Shape History

“But you don’t know anything about the places that you speak of, such as Israel, the Middle East, Africa, Asia. You have never been there! You only know your stuff from theory.”

“What’s the use!”