Graham Connolly: Welcome back to The Offally Offensive.

 

My guest today is one of the most notorious and scrutinised figures in Australian activism, Blair Cottrell. For over two and a half hours, we dissected his decade in the public eye, focusing on his successes, his failures, and the controversies that have defined his time in activism. We talk about the rapid rise and the complex collapse of major movements like the United Patriots Front and Lads Society, why he briefly stepped away from the movement, and the reasons he felt compelled to return. Throughout this episode, we explore a powerful question. What is the true cost of being unfiltered? It’s a genuine organic two and a half hour chat. Let’s get straight into it.

 

I should probably say that I’m here with this important guest that I have today. It’s Shane Warne’s son, Blair Cottrell! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not that important.

 

Graham Connolly: Why did I call you Shane Warne’s son? [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: There was a bit of a fiasco back in the Covid days where I heard a rumour. I heard a rumour that Shane Warne had gone overseas to try to save himself from vaccine poisoning or something and that’s why he died.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And so I shared that rumour with some people and I heard that through family, friends.

 

Graham Connolly: What was funny was, is that that was the first time I ever seen you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really?

 

Graham Connolly: So you got me like, you got me with that! And at the time, I was of course, anti-Covid, anti-vaccine. I was sending that to my friends in Ireland going:

 

“Look at Shane Warne son’s come out and said this….”

 

And then like literally, like 12 hours later, I found out that I was:

 

“Oh, it’s this guy called Blair Cottrell.”

 

Blair Cottrell: If you watch the video. I never claimed to be Shane Warne’s son.

 

Graham Connolly: No. But I only seen like a little snippet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone, some international news, including Indian news. I think cthey shared it saying:

 

“This is Shane Warren’s son.”

 

And everyone believed it.

 

 

Graham Connolly: I believed it. I had to literally 12 hours later, I’m like frantically typing to my mates going:

 

“It’s not Shane Warne’s son!”

 

Because your credibility is important to you when you’re sort of Right-wing, you’re anti-establishment.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You got to protect your credibility. So straight away, I had to correct the record. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I didn’t even know about that. Tom Sewell sent it to me with a crying, laughing faces.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because he saw it going viral. I was late to the party. I was at work, at home. I hadn’t even seen it yet.

 

And then apparently. Yeah, but I’m not Shane Warne’s son. My name is Blair Cottrell.

 

Graham Connolly: This is Blair. Yeah, thanks for coming in, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no worries, mate. It was a bit of a trip out here to Geelong.

 

Graham Connolly: It is from Frankston. It’s like two hours. It’s all the way around there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Last time I came to Geelong. [Graham goes off camera for something] Yeah, no worries, mate. Yeah, I noticed.

 

Graham Connolly: There’s still a learning experience for me here.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you’ve recently had a baby?

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve had a baby recently, yeah. Well, Katie had the baby.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I won’t take credit.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, is it the first one?

 

Graham Connolly: First one, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Congratulations mate.

 

Graham Connolly: Thank you very much. Yeah. It’s three months old now. We had her here in this very living room. Had her, just me and Katie.

 

Blair Cottrell: Home birth?

 

Graham Connolly: No midwives even. We didn’t even have, like, normally you’d have a midwife, you have midwives from the hospital or whatever. But we didn’t have any with midwives or anything. So kate did very well.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard a lot of that going around lately.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Especially since that pandemic fiasco. There’s a lot less trust in the official medical institutions and people are just kind of going natural.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And interestingly, my sister did the same thing. She’s got two young boys now. She was told she would never have kids. She had endometriosis and there was problems with her reproductive system. But she focused herself on healing and she had two boys, naturally. Home births.

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: And there’s nothing wrong with them. They’ve had no vaccines and they’re the biggest, strongest, healthiest boys you’ll ever see.

 

Graham Connolly: You notice it with the kids, don’t you? The ones that are not vaccinated?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Oh, well, I don’t know. I’ve got nothing to compare it to because I haven’t seen that many different babies. But I have noticed that the kids that don’t get vaccinated and so forth, they don’t seem to have many problems.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, no, I’ve noticed this. We had a couple that used to play a game called Vaccinate or Not. So like every child that we’d meet we literally have a little game with them. It seems like a bit more. But where the game, they’d guess, was the child vaccinated or not? And the funny thing about it is you’d always find out because the parents of vaccinated children are always very fast to brag about it. They’re very proud of themselves.

 

Blair Cottrell: Still these days. You think they would be?

 

Graham Connolly: I think they still are, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you think that’s about?

 

[04:54]

 

Graham Connolly: Being accepted, socially, I think. Comes back to, especially women. I think women have always needed to be part of the tribe socially, haven’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe also it’s a way to cope with the guilt that perhaps they were wrong.

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s:

 

“Well, I did the right thing. I vaccinated my child. I’m a good person.”

 

Maybe trying to block out the possibility that maybe that wasn’t the right choice.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. There’s the old saying, it’s easier to fool a man than to convince a man he has been fooled!

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately, that’s true.

 

Graham Connolly: It is true.

 

Blair Cottrell: One of the ways I got started in public commentary, activism, was to try to convince Leftists that the whole world view they’d been sold was just kind of a modern communist propaganda trope. And I was convinced I could do it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I angered a lot of them. I don’t know if I converted any, but that’s the way I first got started, with a whiteboard in my bedroom. That was back in probably 2015, early 2015, I think.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, I think before I ever got involved in real life doing anything, what I was trying to do was I had this thing in my head where if I can wake up my family and my loved ones and you can wake up your family and your loved ones to “wake up” then we’ll reach critical mass and everybody will wake up!

 

But it’s not as easy as you think it is! Even just to wake up to people that you think are going to be receptive to it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Your family, are they here in Australia? Ireland?

 

Graham Connolly: Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve got a brother in Canada.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: And the rest are in Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you grew up in Ireland?

 

Graham Connolly: I grew up in Ireland. Moved here when I was like 23. Came here for a holiday.

 

Blair Cottrell: Southern. Northern?

 

Graham Connolly: Southern. Right in the middle, little place called County Offley.

 

Blair Cottrell: That would make you Catholic?

 

Graham Connolly: That would make me Catholic, yeah. Grow up in a Catholic school, all that sort of thing. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting! That would have been very, …

 

Graham Connolly: It’s actually insane! You, like, you don’t realise it comparison, but it was like the Catholic Church had a real grip on the school system in Ireland back that time.

 

Blair Cottrell: What year would that have been?

 

Graham Connolly: I would have started school probably around 89.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: 88, 89.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was born 89.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Right. So I was probably starting school around then. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep. Was there much. I suppose there was a lot of that sort of Catholic nationalism going on, Irish nationalism. But if that’s how you would describe it. Was there much conflict between the Catholics and the Protestants around that era?

 

Graham Connolly: There was in a, but it was light hearted. So where I’m from, I never actually thought much about it. But we had our own church. They had their own church. But there was a small population of Protestants where I was from. They had their own schools, their own churches.

 

Blair Cottrell: But they still lived in the same region.

 

Graham Connolly: They still lived in the same villages. We had a handful, like, I’m from a village of like 300 people and there was like a handful of families in that village that were Protestant. But they usually lived on the outskirts of the villages, nicer houses [chuckling] and a little bit of land and stuff like that. But it was funny because even as kids we didn’t understand what the difference was between Catholics and Protestants. But you still snipe at each other, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that because it’s a cultural thing?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s a cultural thing, I think it’s no different than you snipe at the Travelers. The Travelers snipe at the settled people. You just always have conflict, I think, between people.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a tribal thing, though, isn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: It’s a tribal thing, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think people almost need to feel like they belong to an in-group and they also need an enemy. Even if everyone is the same, they’ll find a way to make an enemy out of the people over the next hill.

 

Graham Connolly: But it was funny, like in that, where I was from, in the village I was from slagging matches were to go. Everybody loved to slag each other. It was like quick wit and just slagging off each other, whatever you could think of to make each other. But it was no real hard feelings involved in it. It was just people trying to be funny towards each other, taking the piss out of each other. It’s just an Irish thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And it was the same. The Protestant would just give you one extra thing that you could slag them over and the same in reverse. But they still came down and played soccer with us, like played football in the park. Do you know what I mean?

 

 

So it was like this weird divide that was there, but it wasn’t actually there. You didn’t go to the same schools, you didn’t go to the same church, but you played football together, you still hung out together.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, you still went trick or treating on Halloween together and stuff like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is this just because maybe your village was low population and it wasn’t particularly vicious, the division?

 

[09:06]

 

Graham Connolly: Well, I think in the Republic of Ireland there wasn’t much division anyway by the time we were growing up. It was like almost as if., … And the Northern Irish people would often say that they were abandoned by the Republican Irish people like that once we got our independence, it was like:

 

“Whoa, we got our independence. Turn their back on them, kind of thing!”

 

That can be debated because there’s an awful lot of people in the Republic that still don’t accept that it’s not a united Ireland. So but there is still that little bit of jabbing that goes on there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. When did you last go back? Have you been back for a visit?

 

Graham Connolly: I used to go back once, basically every year. But when Covid happened I haven’t been back since. I got a dog. Well, you probably heard howling there a second ago. [chuckling] I got a dog.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a big dog.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I got a dog when Covid happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: It nails you down sometimes, …

 

Graham Connolly: Sometimes you don’t like, think through everything about like, I love the dog. The dog got me back out and about, got me back training. Because you have to start walking the dog.

 

And when I start walking the dog, I had become a little bit of a bloody couch potato to be honest with you, I’ve been working the same job for 10 years and it was an office job and stuff like that. So then I got the dog. And it’s when the novelty wears off a dog, that’s when you find out who you are, I’ll tell you that now. You get a dog and like you’re., … Because, it’s the fairy tale again. You think of how nice to have a friend there, have it out there. And for the first three weeks it’s new, it’s fun! But then it’s a chore. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, are you going to keep walking this dog every day and the novelty’s worn off? Like the new car novelty. Once the new car smell has worn off, [chuckling] worn off the dog, are you going to keep bringing it for a walk every day?

 

Blair Cottrell: It becomes a time and money pit, doesn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: Time and money pit! And then it’s like, now you have to get through that period of:

 

“Fuck doing it!”

 

Like almost that period of regret.

 

And if you do, because you have to then, because it’s a responsibility, then you come out the other end loving the dog.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got a love hate relationship with dogs myself.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think suburbia in particular can be a cruel place to have a dog.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It can be.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because they can smell and hear everything.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’re not typically raised or bred to be around that much constant stimulation.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So it can be very stressful for them. They’re supposed to guard livestock. They’re supposed to have a lot of land to run around on. They’ve got a job to do and they’re proud of their job. They understand their job. Whereas in suburbia they’re sort of just suffering alongside you.

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve noticed even with my two, there’s a couple of dogs down the way and I think they be left out or whatever. It’s like one of those things where people got dogs and then they just can ignore them. They basically probably get a bowl of food every day and they’re just ignored.

 

And sometimes you hear them whimpering and whinging and crying and giving out, and it affects my dogs! You can hear it, because they can hear these dogs suffering, like I’m telling you, I agree, I think that you’re right.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s misery loves company man. Humans, they’re suffering here in suburbia in this unnatural environment where we develop cancers from all the radiation through the air and the Wi-Fi and so forth. And that’s why the dogs get cancers as well. Because it’s an unnatural environment.

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: And we have to subject the poor beasts to the same suffering that we’re in. We can’t do it ourselves!

 

Graham Connolly: And that’s why in the West, we have dogs that have behavioural problems. It’s weird, right? Because if you go to places like Mexico or India where these dogs are just roaming the street.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean behavioural problems?

 

Graham Connolly: Like dogs getting anxiety and shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Are they on medication?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, on medication! [chuckling] Like people give their dogs medication in suburbia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think my dog’s got ADHD!

 

Graham Connolly: Mine get to go chase rabbits and stuff like that every day. So they seem pretty good. But a lot of people have their dogs on medication for anxiety.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve known cats that are on that kind of thing. I’ve known diabetic cats that have to have their insulin shots.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, right. And even there’s a guy, I don’t know if you ever seen Caesar Milan. The Dog Whisperer like on YouTube. He’s pretty bloody good to watch sometimes, like his videos and stuff like that. But he turns up and it’s always these Western dogs basically like suburban dogs that just have serious behavioural problems like their barking and just like biting other dogs, fighting other dogs, all kinds of carry on. And he always makes the comparison that if you see these street dogs in India that have like three legs and like their tails off and like these dogs have gone through the wars.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t want to imagine what happens to dogs in India. The poor basterds!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

[13:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But dogs on medication is interesting. Medication is a double edged sword though. Isn’t it? It can prolong life, but what quality of life is it prolonging at the end of the day?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I’m alive now because of medication, I can tell you that.

 

Graham Connolly: Really?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well think about it. Like you could possibly say the same for yourself. You had a bad infection.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, 100% actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. We would typically die of, …

 

Graham Connolly: I had my appendix out when I was a kid.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there you go. Often without antibiotics, deep tissue infections or even just sinus infections. They were a common killer of men for a long time. Did I looked up recently the average life expectancy for the standard human in 1900 was 32! 32 years old was the average life expectancy* for you and me in 1900.

 

[This figure is misleading as it was due to a high death rate for new borns and young children, etc.]

 

And now it’s gone up to about 76 or something.

 

Graham Connolly: I didn’t have my first baby till 42.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there you go.

 

Graham Connolly: You know when you put it like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes sense because when you walk through., … Because I went to England last year, October last year. And when you walk through the graveyards on a lot of the stones there’s this guy’s dead 22, this guy’s dead 28. And you’re thinking, why so young? And it’s disease, infections, things that they didn’t have medicine for 100 years.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. But it became corrupt, didn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Like I said, double edged sword.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s a double edged sword. So like they discover these things like penicillin and discover these things that save a lot of lives and yeah. Like fighting against disease and fight against this and fight against that. Fight against infection.

 

Blair Cottrell: Pharmacology. Well, the Greek word for witchcraft is “pharmakia”. It’s pharma.

 

So the Greeks understood witchcraft as a form of potion making or drug brewing, you might say. And just like in traditional European folklore, there’s good witches and bad witches. And so Medicine can be used for good or bad, but there’s a whole industry. I don’t know if we’ll get started on it, but the first time I considered the lucrative and ruthless exploits of pharmacology was 18 years old. I was working in the city Melbourne. Would have been roughly when you arrived in Ireland [Australia], I reckon, 2008. And I saw on the ceiling or the roof of Southern Cross Station, huge banners! Huge, big banners saying:

 

“Are you feeling down today? It could be depression. Call this number.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Trying to convince everyone they were depressed. And I thought. I didn’t think, maybe I’m depressed. Maybe that’s what everyone else was thinking. I was thinking:

 

“Why are they putting so much effort into trying to make people feel like they’re depressed?”

 

And then I looked into the number on the bottom and I did some research and I found out in certain states in America, you’re allowed to advertise prescription drugs like Prozac antidepressants, directly to the public.

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: Just on TV:

 

“Prozac. Make your life better. Come and buy it from your local pharmacist!”

 

Or go get a prescription for it first, whatever. In Australia, you’re not allowed to do that. You’re not allowed to advertise the drug. So instead they advertise the symptoms.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s a way around it, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: And then you call Beyond Blue, or you call your psychologist, and then you end up with a psychiatrist. You get the prescription, you’re on the drug.

 

Graham Connolly: Everybody’s on it! Everybody’s on it. Fucking crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Something like a third of all people are on some sort of prescription medication for their mood. It makes you realise the kind of things that humans have been through in history, but now the stress of your mortgage or something is too much.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It doesn’t really make sense to me.

 

Graham Connolly: No, it’s crazy, isn’t it? Yeah. It just goes to show what we’re not made for, though. We’re not made for that stress and trying to pay a bloody Bill or something. I think we’re made for war! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of us.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s different castes of men.

 

Graham Connolly: There is, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, have you heard of the caste system? The warrior, the merchant?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, a little bit. Tell me more.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what do you think you belong to?

 

Graham Connolly: Oh, warrior caste, I reckon, because if I look at my name, the Connolly name, it goes back a thousand years. Thousands of years, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where does it come from?

 

Graham Connolly: Ireland. Well, the Celtics.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does it mean, Connolly?

 

Graham Connolly: It means “fierce as a hound”.

 

Blair Cottrell: Ah.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So it’s got to be war! And Ben did a lot of research recently. You know Ben, our man Ben?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Ben did a lot of research recently. And it’s funny that his mother’s side of his family and my family name have mad connections back in the day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like how was that?

 

[17:06]

 

Graham Connolly: His family were like farmer caste in Ireland and ours were warrior caste and apparently like we used to work together, like we defend their farms and shit, way back when. So the mother side of his family.

 

But I want to talk to him more about. Because we just talked a little bit about over text like. What’s the name? I’m trying to remember it. Because his mother’s family name changed their name. It seems like they left and then came back like hundreds of years later to Ireland and then took back their Celtic name or whatever. So they left their Celtic name behind, went to France or somewhere like that. And then they came back hundreds of years later and took back their Celtic name. And then there’s this connection to the Connolly clans in Ireland.

 

So the Connolly clan in Ireland as well you can trace back to the what’s called the four tribes of Tara [sp] of the Hillitara [sp]. So it’s like four very prominent tribes way back when, … And then even before that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Prominent for what purpose?

 

Graham Connolly: Like basically they ruled over Ireland. Like these four tribes of Tara

 

Blair Cottrell: Landowners?

 

Graham Connolly: Landowners and yeah, like hikings [sp] and stuff like that that’s what they were called. Like there’s this regional kings.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve known a few Connolly’s.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what that indicates is a lot of people survived from the Connolly line.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Meaning usually that indicates that there was money there or there was power there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Well, no, not when I was growing up, mind you! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But hey, things change, I guess.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did your family when you were growing up have a stake in a certain enterprise? What were they doing for a job?

 

Graham Connolly: No, not really. Not really. No.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s easy to lose.

 

Graham Connolly: I think that’s what happened as well. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: They just lost themselves, I reckon over the years, you know, under English rule really is what happened. You become peasants, like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, it’s the English’s fault!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: If it wasn’t for the poms Graham here would be rich and famous! Those poms have robbed him of his fate, his future! [Graham laughing] Yeah. But my family comes from just dairy farmers.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, right. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They had a fair bit of land, but they were just workers. They were cold, hard bastards!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they disagreed with each other, and the family kind of split apart, and we all ended up with nothing. And that’s what happens.

 

Graham Connolly: It is what happens. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But families who stay together, let me tell you, mate, they make money!

 

Graham Connolly: They do.

 

Blair Cottrell: And these days, families atomizing from each other. By atomizing, I mean every individual in the family going their separate ways, which tends to happen more and more in the modern day.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s kind of become what we do in the West, and it’s wrong. We grew up with this. I don’t know if you grew up with it here, but we grew up with it back home in Ireland, where you don’t talk about politics, you don’t talk about money, you don’t talk about religion. This was like the three things you’re not supposed to talk about because for an easy life, or a comfortable life, but it’s the three things you should be talking about! It’s the three things that rule your life! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Three things that matter.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s the three things that matter! You should be sitting around the dinner table discussing this stuff, educating your children and stuff. But that’s not what happened back then. It was like:

 

“No, don’t talk about that, because it’ll lead to conflict in the family. Don’t talk about that!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. There was never the conflict along those lines in my family, though. It’s not like anyone ever disagreed over politics or religion. People just in the family gradually began to see each other less and less. I mean, we used to get together when I was a kid and have Christmas together. I used to see my aunties and uncles. We used to go and see my grandmother and grandfather.

 

Graham Connolly: Where did you grow up?

 

Blair Cottrell: In Southeast Melbourne.

 

Graham Connolly: So where you are now?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I’ve always lived in the same spot, and my family was kind of all around there. My family was originally from the bottom of Falls Creek at a town called Mount Beauty. A lot of dairy farming land around there. My uncle recently went back there and bought some property. He’s done quite well for himself.

 

Graham Connolly: Beautiful up there, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: It is nice.

 

Graham Connolly: Real nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s cold in the winter.

 

Graham Connolly: It gets very cold!

 

Blair Cottrell: But I don’t mind that. Yeah, I don’t mind it. I’m always running hot.

 

But what I’m saying is, as time has gone on, I think there’s a certain pressure or influence in society that has caused us all to split off into our own little individual cliques. And so we only spent time with our immediate family. And then it got even worse than that, where now even I don’t even really have that much time to speak to my sisters anymore because I’m so busy. They’re living their own lives. Everyone’s got their own rent or mortgage and car loans and Netflix subscriptions.

 

Whereas if we could all come together and reclaim a stake in a certain enterprise, even if it was just like soap making or carpet laying or something, you know what I mean? Then you can really start to like establish a bit more for our wealth.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, you actually see, is it the Mormons or something over here? I’ve noticed that. So in my job we have a factory off the office that like manufactures steel products and stuff like that for jump farms and all that sort of thing. But a lot of welding and stuff goes on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who has that?

 

Graham Connolly: Just the company I work for.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

[21:42]

 

Graham Connolly: And it’s got like:

 

“We need an air supply.”

 

And I’ve noticed that all the companies that supply air are all Mormons. All of them! Every company!

 

So if you try to play one company off the other, for example, for quotes and stuff like that, they’re actually they’re in cahoots with each other. Like you notice it because they’ll send you an invoice and it actually looks the same as the invoice from the other company. All the companies are sewn up by the same families, like in, same extended family. It’s almost like the Amish.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a shame. It comes down to it, the way I see it, you’re either working with your own family or you’re working for someone else’s.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you’re not working with your own family, in a family owned factory, a family owned business, if you’re going out on your own, which is supposed to be something that’s almost encouraged and admired, isn’t it?:

 

“Oh, he’s out of his own! Good on him! Good on him!”

 

No, you’re just working for someone else’s family interests.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So what’s your grandfather work at?

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a dairy farmer.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Over here?

 

Blair Cottrell: Up in Mount Beauty.

 

Graham Connolly: Up in Mount Beauty, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But then he married my grandmother and they came down and bought some property in Pearcedale, which is a bit inland from Frankston but in the same general region. And he built his own greyhound training facility. So he built a big greyhound track at the front of his property. Had about 30 acres. He built a run, a bull ring and had about 100 kennels. And people would come from all over the country to have their greyhounds trained for racing at my grandfather’s facility. He welded all that shit together himself. An entire lure. And you know the lure that the fake rabbit runs on?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: He got this metal sheet work and built a track, built a big fence around it and somehow engineered the lure. He’s not qualified to do any of that.

 

Graham Connolly: They were so good! Those men, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The sheds, the hundred kennels, the hundred steel kennels with steel Gates. My grandfather somehow welded all that together himself over a period of years. And made a business that made a lot of money. I remember I went to see him just before he sold the property. He recently sold it. And he told me he was making so much money he felt like Santa Claus. I didn’t really know what he meant by that. [chuckling] He wasn’t always that great with his words.

 

 

Graham Connolly: He was probably just able to be generous with it, I guess.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he’s in comfortable retirement now.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you reckon those men, I know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re a different breed.

 

Graham Connolly: They seem to have so much more time in their day and I don’t know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s because they’re working on their own property.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. They don’t have their phone, they don’t have the bloody television, they don’t have the laptop. They don’t have any distractions really.

 

Blair Cottrell: Give me 20 acres and I won’t need any sort of social media. I won’t need anything. 20 acres with plenty of work to do and an idea in my head and I’ll get up 5 AM every morning, I’ll work on it till dark. And that’s what my grandfather did.

 

Graham Connolly: And then they had community as well. So if they were busy, if they needed a tool that they didn’t have, didn’t have to have the money to go and buy that tool, they could borrow it from the neighbour.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, until they get going.

 

Blair Cottrell: And my old man, I remember my dad’s got three brothers and my dad and his brothers would go over there and give him a hand every now and then when he was still building it up. I remember going as a kid and helping dig holes, post holes that were going to be the fence around the greyhound track in the front paddock. And so yeah, it was all kind of a family made business but everyone’s kind of gone their separate ways, as I said. And I’m not really sure where the wealth’s going to end up.

 

Graham Connolly: So your dad didn’t have any interest in the greyhounds?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not necessarily. My dad was, … Greyhound training it’s a brutal business.

 

Graham Connolly: It is, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If a dog breaks a leg, it gets shot!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I’ve got cousins that are into a back home in Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Not to that sort of scale, though.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you saw how it happens.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! They love it, though. Like, the people really get into it, don’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a lot of money in it.

 

Graham Connolly: And it’s like, we love our dogs. And then you add another aspect to your dog. Like you said before, now you got a useful dog, a dog that has a job to do, a dog that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Still, I gotta say, if you loved dogs, you probably wouldn’t want to be in greyhound training!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, probably not.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t go as far as saying it’s cruel, but they all live in tight little kennels. They exist only to run and make money for their owners.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And as soon as they can’t do that anymore, they generally get shot.

 

[25:41]

 

Graham Connolly: Have you noticed a lot of people now are adopting greyhounds?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve noticed that.

 

Graham Connolly: You know what?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s a good thing.

 

Graham Connolly: It is good. But you know what’s funny about it? Greyhounds in Victoria are not allowed off leash at all! Even in off leash parks.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that?

 

Graham Connolly: I think it’s because they have that drive to chase, rabbits, the lure, and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll run over a kid or something?

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe. I think it’s a bit unfair because they’re the most well trained, disciplined dogs that there is.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ve got a great nature.

 

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And they’re so well trained because it’s pretty cruel, like. And it’s strict to train. So you see people nowadays with a greyhound. If you see people walking a greyhound on a leash, the greyhound is perfect.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: A greyhound walks perfect on a leash. But it can be deceiving. Because the person that’s walking that greyhound might not be very experienced with dogs at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But they look like they are. But if something goes, like, if another dog runs up on them. It happened here. One of my dogs got out. And this is when I first had this thought. One of my dogs got, …

 

Blair Cottrell: With a greyhound?

 

Graham Connolly: So, yeah, it was a woman walking past here with a greyhound.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And I think I was in the shower or something and the door wasn’t closed properly and the dog, but he’s a good dog, so he’s fine. So he ran over. He didn’t do anything. He just ran over and the woman starts screaming!

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s what makes the dog act radically.

 

Graham Connolly: But the dog didn’t because it’s a greyhound!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Because the greyhound is so well trained. The greyhound just knew it was not, … Because as soon as I seen it, by the time I went out, my dog was just sitting because he just went:

 

“Oh shit, what have I done?”

 

So he’s sitting, the greyhound is chill as and the woman is screaming to me:

 

“Get him away! Get him away! Get him away!”

 

Blair Cottrell: You notice women don’t understand dogs.

 

Graham Connolly: No, they don’t!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like they give dogs incessant constant commands. They stress and they scream at the dog and the poor beast doesn’t know what the hell to do. And usually if the dog isn’t well trained, fortunately that greyhound was.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it was, the greyhound.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because the woman’s screaming and carrying on, the dog freaks out and ends up behaving worse than it otherwise would.

 

Graham Connolly: They can go into protective mode. The thing is that greyhound was just so chill, that he knew that my dog wasn’t aggressive either. Like so the greyhound had more sense than the woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: For me, dogs are easy. They respect strength.

 

Graham Connolly: They do.

 

Blair Cottrell: And to a dog, strength is self control, containment.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You stay calm, you don’t give the dog a command unless it’s necessary. And you say as little as possible and if he doesn’t listen, you give him a foot in the ass. That’s really simple.

 

Graham Connolly: Me and Kate takes two dogs for a walk every morning down to Point Henry, right down to the beach to chase rabbits and stuff like that. But every morning the greyhound gets, he gets, … The Dane gets really excited! Really excited!

 

Blair Cottrell: Your Dane?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, the Dane. And normally I don’t have time. Normally you just wait for five minutes or whatever till the excitement goes out of the dog. Then you go. But what we do is we put the dogs into the back of the van. We got the baby in the seat, one of us is in the back. We just don’t even look at the dog. So the dog’s like excited. Like you don’t even, you don’t say sit down. You don’t. You’re quiet, nothing. And you don’t start the car or else you will start it sometimes, but you don’t move it.

 

So we will just sit there, sit there, sit there. And after about 30 seconds, or a minute, the dog will do a yawn. And that’s where I’ve seen this, like on the dog training videos. That’s where something, a switch happens in the brain.

 

Blair Cottrell: They get bored. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: They does this big yawn and then we’ll drive off. And he’s calm.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: I have to remember that.

 

Graham Connolly: You have to wait for the yawn.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And then they’re ready to go.

 

Graham Connolly: And then they’re chill.

 

[29:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So what first got you into the, … Would you consider yourself, like, politically. We’ll talk about politics now a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, why not?

 

Blair Cottrell: You ready for that?

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that allowed?

 

Graham Connolly: That is allowed.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right.

 

Graham Connolly: This is called the Offaly Offensive, after all.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, well, we’ll keep it in the realm of offensive. What you would describe yourself as? Nationalists? National Socialist?

 

Graham Connolly: I would describe myself as a National Socialist, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So to a lot of people, that’s very heavy. And what’s your understanding of National Socialism?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, to be honest with you, I’ll tell you how I came to it is that I suppose growing up, I’m the sort of person that always, I didn’t necessarily read too many books. I didn’t necessarily read into all these different ideologies or anything. I just always went with my gut, what I feel is right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Instinct.

 

Graham Connolly: Instinct rather than, … And I always even when there was social pressure to say that this is okay or, later in life, it was the gender stuff. Now, that’s radical. But even earlier on, like, I can’t think of any examples off the top of my head, but anything that was sort of been put to me as the socially accepted thing, if it didn’t seem right to me, I would go against it. I was like:

 

“No, I don’t accept that’s wrong! That’s completely wrong!”

 

But I didn’t know I was a National Socialist until sort of years later. So for years I just found that I was going more and more and more and more against the grain of society, against what has been sold to me as, this is right. It’s not right!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, was there a triggering moment for you, that you remember?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, eventually I read Mein Kampf. But the reason I read Mein Kampf eventually was because I was being called Nazi so much online and I was defending myself so much. [chuckling] I, like, we all probably went through it. Like, we’re gone through it. I thought I was real clever by going:

 

“How can I be a Nazi? I’m not a socialist!”

 

Like, that was my stupid answer. Like, do you know what I mean? I’m not an Nazi. I’m not. This was back when I was denying being a Nazi. I’m still under:

 

“I’m not a Nazi. Like, this is just what I believe.”

 

But then it happens so much because what I was doing, I spent an awful lot of years just bickering with people, wasting time online, bickering with people and trying to change people’s mind. Trying to red pill people, as they say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But still not calling myself a National Socialist.

 

But in hindsight, I always was a National Socialist. I think I was a National Socialist from birth basically. Like just born! Natural law. That’s what I believe in. Like, almost all our things I believe in is natural law, you know, strength, the right of conquest. Like, it all seems obvious to me. When I say “the right of conquest”. Have you ever heard of the right of conquest?

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course. Yeah. Might is right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, kind of to an extent. Yeah. The right conquest. The best way I can understand the right of conquest is kind of like similar to how when big ships, like Cook’s fleet arrived in Australia. That would be, I think, the only equivalent nowadays to, … Because people don’t seem to be able to, … They like to look back and try to judge that through today’s eyes. And you can’t do it.

 

So I think the only way you can really judge that is if you can imagine a spaceship of space aliens that have arrived from bloody the other side of the galaxy or something, and have been traveling for 10,000 years and they are all of a sudden like Independence Day type shit, they just arrive through the fucking clouds.

 

Blair Cottrell: What are they supposed to do, go:

 

“Oh, there’s already people here. We’ll just go!”

 

[chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! [chuckling] So they arrive all right. What if they’re so far advanced that we’re ants, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: If they manage to get here, chances are they would be.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, they’re so far advanced that we’re ants. So, like, it’d be like an ant trying to communicate with me not to walk on his nest, eh?

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. That’s actually why Stephen. I think it was Stephen Hawking. I won’t attribute it to Stephen Hawking because I’m not really sure, but it was someone of that category of super smart individual. He was against sending radio signals out into space, …

 

Graham Connolly: For that reason!

 

Blair Cottrell: For that reason. Because he said:

 

“Any potential alien civilisation that is advanced enough to receive, interpret and trace those signals back is going to do the same thing to Earth that every European colonist did to every other country.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the mathematical thing to consider. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So like I always try to put myself into the mind of a person in that scenario. All right. And you’re here going:

 

“Well let’s say we tried to communicate with them.”

 

We tried to go:

 

“Hey, yeah!”

 

Like basically like an ant waving at me:

 

“We’re here! We’re here! What the fuck are you doing?”

 

Like you know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Magnifying glass.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, but maybe they might not even have any malice towards us, because I don’t have any malice towards the ant nest.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, you don’t.

 

Graham Connolly: No malice.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’ll stand on it because you’re bigger.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s just insignificant to me. It just doesn’t even matter, you know what I mean? So there we’re here going basically trying to get their attention. Yeah, but what if they’re so much more powerful they don’t even hear us. Like they’re not even, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s very naive.

 

Graham Connolly: So now we have a choice, don’t we? We have a choice that we can either., … What are you gonna bloody roll over and die? Are you gonna just survive in this new reality?

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you believe in aliens? Do you think they real?

 

[34:08]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I do.

 

Blair Cottrell: What kind of aliens do you believe in?

 

Graham Connolly: All kinds, I think because it’s just like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think they have influence over Earth now or?

 

Graham Connolly: Oh, let’s see, that’s a real, … That’s an interesting question.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s something that I’ve thought about but I haven’t been able to draw a conclusion.

 

Graham Connolly: I won’t be able to draw a conclusion, either.

 

Blair Cottrell: It feels like it would make sense if you consider that every different species of humanity is being pitted against each other.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: With a common enemy.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And we as a species will actually tear each other apart and downgrade ourselves in the process.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s almost like “zoo hypothesis” they call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well before an enemy, before an invader comes into a foreign territory, it’s in the invaders interests to weaken that territory. Military structure, government, as much as possible, have it as divided as possible so it’s ready to be conquered easily. And it almost feels like that’s what’s happening here on Earth, doesn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, like South Park did a, I think it was South Park. Maybe it was one of these ones did a episode which basically like Earth was like a zoo.

 

And it was just like a TV show. Like, so there’s aliens up there watching like the Truman Show. And it’s just like they just put all these different species, like, so lions are from a planet, tigers are from a planet.

 

Blair Cottrell: They just put them all and they, …

 

Graham Connolly: Just like took them all and just dumped them here!

 

Blair Cottrell: Every time there’s a major crisis, or a war, more unidentified flying objects are apparently reported. And that could be the camera crews, you know, … [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Literally. [chuckling] Who knows? Like, honestly, it could be this whole scenario of like, we’re just ants, like, what do we know? But I don’t know. Like, there is the other flip of the kind in the fact that the size of the universe is almost like that. Like, let’s say we had a telescope that could look sort of anywhere within our own galaxy, never even mind all the other galaxies, because it’s just, even, that is just so vast and big to try and imagine it.

 

But let’s say we could like zoom in on every, like zoom in properly and actually focus and see what’s going on there. Let’s say you look halfway to the other side of the galaxy. I forget what size the Milky Way is, but it’s bloody, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s probably unfathomable anyways.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, by the time you zoom in there, the light from that place could have taken a million years to travel here.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, so you could see the past.

 

Graham Connolly: So what you’re seeing is a million years in the past. So even if there was, it’s just the timing is, it’s mind boggling!

 

Blair Cottrell: I was about to say the same phrase, mind boggling! It’s too much for any one man to even consider or think about really. The universe!

 

Graham Connolly: It is fun to think about though, but it’s mind boggling! It’s hard to know. So to think about only 20 or 30 years ago, like, we’d look up at an Andromeda, which is the next closest galaxy to us, and it was just another star in the sky. And then one day we were able, we had a telescope that was able to resolve that and realise, oh shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: But even our own planet is a mystery. Have you heard about the inner Earth?

 

Graham Connolly: I have, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you think about that? Are you sold on it or not really?

 

Graham Connolly: No, [chuckling] I’m not sold on it. I’m definitely not sold on the inner Earth!

 

Blair Cottrell: But on the Agatha, like?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Your man Bird, isn’t it? Is. Wasn’t that his name?

 

Blair Cottrell: Admirable Bird.

 

Graham Connolly: Admiral Bird.

 

Blair Cottrell: This is the guy who flew over the North Pole and apparently went inside the Earth.

 

Graham Connolly: That is interesting. It is interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s been some people who have, how do you say, debunked that they reckon that he didn’t actually write that in his diary.

 

Graham Connolly: Ah!

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone said he wrote it in his diary, or someone said he told the story and then it became he wrote it in his diary. But he didn’t. But I’m not sure. Don’t quote me on that.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. No, I don’t think I buy that one, to be honest. I, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s still a lot going on about Earth that doesn’t necessarily make sense. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I’m a bit of a Simulation Theory advocate, to be honest.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean by that?

 

Graham Connolly: We’re in a simulation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the “simulation”. I thought you said “assimilation”. I thought you were against assimilation! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Definitely! [chuckling] No, I think there’s good possibility it’s a simulation, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: What makes you think that? And if the audience doesn’t know simulation theory, most people probably would know is the theory that we’re living in a computer simulation. That this is not real life, so to speak. It’s real to us as far as we understand what real is.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And it doesn’t even matter if it is a simulation because you’ve got to live by the rules of the simulation anyway. So you still got to go and live your life!

 

[38:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s possible to bend the rules like Neo in the Matrix?

 

Graham Connolly: I think to an extent it probably is. And that’s where you know how people talk about manifestation and the laws of attraction and stuff like that. I think that’s the kind of thing. For example, the more you victimize yourself, the more of a victim you will be, sort of thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you make it a reality by thinking about it.

 

Graham Connolly: You make your reality by thinking about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that that could just be the power of the mind though? Like, naturally, for example, I’m gonna think all day about a bowl of nuts that I want to eat. Then on the way home from the shop, I’m probably going to pull in to buy some nuts and then when I get home, I’m going to pull a bowl out and then I’m going to put the nuts in the bowl, I’m going to eat them. That’s because I’ve thought about it all day. So it’s more that you’re motivating yourself to it.

 

 

Graham Connolly: You could that you’ve programmed it into the simulation. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, right.

 

Graham Connolly: But I don’t know. Yeah, look, it’s a, there’s an awful lot going on that we don’t know. I think that’s what wisdom is though, is knowing how little we actually know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s also being able to entertain the possibility of something without accepting it. And I think that’s an important thing.

 

A lot of people don’t seem to be able to do that, interestingly. Which I really like to wonder about things like, what if this is true and what if that is true?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And being able to, with a sober mind, just observe what’s in front of you and consider the possibilities without falling too much into belief.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. What do you think? Do you believe in aliens?

 

Blair Cottrell: I just don’t know.

 

Graham Connolly: You don’t know either.

 

Blair Cottrell: For all I know, we could be the aliens.

 

Graham Connolly: Definitely could be. Have you heard the theory that, what is it, is it? I don’t know which one it is. There’s so many theories out there. But one of the theories is that an alien species came down and they took basically the most advanced primate on the planet. So let’s say we were monkeys basically at the time. Well, or great apes, similar to chimpanzees, but a little bit more smarter than chimpanzees, higher IQ than chimpanzees. And they took us and then they just kick started our evolution by like 2 million years or something.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard it. And it does, it makes sense that we’re a somewhat bastardized species because we break down pretty early, we wear out, we probably should live longer. And there’s some evidence that we did used to live a lot longer and grow a lot taller. And so we could be a bastardized version of what we were once created to be.

 

I do tend to lean towards creationism. Meaning it seems like something made us.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: For a specific purpose perhaps. Or maybe just because it could

 

Graham Connolly: Well I tend to lean towards creationism when it comes to the entire simulation, let’s say. But that’s kind of what this comes back to. Simulation Theory, comes back to for me as well. Is the whole thing created?

 

Blair Cottrell: Genetically though, it doesn’t make sense that we’re from this planet.

 

Graham Connolly: I agree. Why do you think that?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s multiple reasons. I’m driving down the street and the sun’s in my face and I can’t see! I need to put specially made glasses with polarisation lenses so I can see properly. And even then it’s kind of hard. And I’m thinking:

 

“If we developed on this planet, shouldn’t I be able to stand the sun glare?”

 

 

No, I can’t! I cant’t even walk outside on this planet without specially designed protective footwear. Yeah, we need specially built shelters with temperature control so we don’t freeze to death or get too hot and die of heat stroke.

 

[Hmm, abos manage without shoes, sunnies, clothes, etc.]

 

Graham Connolly: And then you take my dogs. Yeah, I can bring them out to the outback. I can bring them up to the snow. I can bring them to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Every species on this planet has thick hide, fur, scales, feathers, and we’ve just got this fragile pink skin. If we stay out too long in the elements, we die!

 

Graham Connolly: We can’t deal with the cold, we can’t deal with the heat.

 

Blair Cottrell: But we evolved here and adapted to the environment? Doesn’t seem like we did! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Strange.

 

Blair Cottrell: So where are we? I think we’re from somewhere further out from the sun, possibly a bit cooler and not as harsh. Possibly somewhere with less gravity too. A smaller planet.

 

Graham Connolly: But then in a funny way, we can’t deal with the cold either.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. Oh, well, we, …

 

Graham Connolly: So maybe it was similar, that was, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We can deal with it. We could deal with a bit colder. It depends on where you are on the planet. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Except if you take away your claws and your ability to heat.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, it might be that this particular solar system and this sun is just kind of extreme.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it could be, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But also the gravity is, …

 

[42:43]

 

 

Graham Connolly: There were Red Dwarf suns that would give off less heat and stuff like that, but then the flare more, so they sterilise their systems. So but yeah, who knows, man?

 

Blair Cottrell: I still believe obviously in a form of ethnic nationalism though, where despite the potential bastardisation of our species, I think we still do have to preserve and elevate ourselves the best of us. I think the greatest purpose in life, despite what you might believe, is to produce children that are smarter and healthier than you are.

 

Graham Connolly: I agree with that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t really see any., … For us mortals as individuals, I don’t think there’s a greater purpose in life than that.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, why do we do it with horses?

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s right. Hitler writes about that inMein Kampf. You might have read it. He said:

 

“We’ll put all this effort and finance into breeding the best racehorses, genetically speaking. But then we bastardize our own species because any form of genetic consideration would be inhuman.”

 

It doesn’t make any sense!

 

Graham Connolly: Doesn’t make any sense.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think would put more thought into breeding better humans rather than better racehorses. But we don’t do that. Because that’s offensive. [chuckling] I don’t see why that’s offensive. I’ve never understood.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t, either. No. What do they call it? Eugenics.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I suppose it’s a form of eugenics to consider, but.

 

Graham Connolly: So why is that inherently evil though?

 

Blair Cottrell: But people do it anyway without realizing it.

 

Graham Connolly: Of course they do!

 

Blair Cottrell: Women especially women are very selective about who they are going to breed with. Because they’re trying to breed up even if they don’t realise it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’ll sometimes make a decision based on [word unclear]

 

Graham Connolly: But nowadays, do you think that’s changed a bit in that they’re breeding for like, the ability for men to have money can skew that. Can skew that genetic, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s confused the situation for women. It’s unusual that you’ll find a man that has a lot of money but is also playing the standard role of protector slash predator that they’re so interested in.

 

And so this is why it’s so often the case that women who settle down or marry very wealthy men who are goody, goody two shoes, do as they’re told. If that’s the way you want to see wealthy men. Not all wealthy men are like that. But let’s say for argument’s sake, more often than not a guy who’s making a lot of money is going to be, he’s gone to university. He’s thinking a lot about money. He’s thinking a lot about staying within the system as a reputable man. So often women will cheat on men like that, even if they’re married to them with criminals. They’ll go down the hill and have their fun and then go back to their husbands and they won’t talk about it. I think there’s a confusion there as a result of wealth, a great deal of wealth producing higher status men who otherwise wouldn’t have status without wealth.

 

Graham Connolly: Higher status. Yeah. They’re higher status for not genetic reasons.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, women are primarily, as far as I understand, more attracted to status than anything else.

 

Because even if you consider that the woman is going to go for the strong man or the warrior who’s going to be able to protect her and her family, the man of higher status who has influence over potentially a hundred fighting men is safer to be with for that reason. Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And women are primarily geared to live a safe life and they’re going to be safer with not only the warrior or the fighter, but the man who has influence over a small army.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So that’s why women like status. But they’re confused now, as I said, because of the money situation, providing status to men who otherwise wouldn’t have it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So back into there, a man earned status by beating other men in battle or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Not just that, but by being respected by other men, followed and admired by other men. Not just for his mercantile skills and money making skills, because he was actually a respectable, dutiful, honourable man.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who would give people the chance. But if they wronged him, he would be brutal in response. Right. And men respected him for that reason. They followed him and he’d build a hold fast. And suddenly you’ve got this lord and landowner who has a choice of spouses. And I think that’s the way it went for thousands of years.

 

Graham Connolly: What? That’s actually an interesting point that you make about how there used to be repercussions for wronging another man, even just in a even just in a very slight way.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s dueling. Like if you didn’t like what someone said about you could challenge them to a duel. And if you wanted to stay or maintain your reputation in society, you had to accept the jewel and someone was going to die. So that actually kept men in check.

 

There’s a saying that civilised men are more rude to each other. I don’t know how the wording of the phrase goes exactly, but savages are more dignified in the way they talk to each other because they know they’re risking having their skulls split if they’re not polite!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

[47:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: Whereas civilised men, who are more pacifists, are going to be absolutely ruthless, stabbing each other in the back, stealing from each other and doing everything they can to crawl over the top of each other because they feel like there’s no physical consequence.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Have you heard, I don’t know if it’s a theory, but basically that the whole point of police and the justice system is to take away your obligation to seek revenge.

 

So, for example, if somebody was to wrong you by hurting your wife or your mother or something like that. Right. Normally back in the day, you would seek revenge, and then their family might seek revenge on you, and you get this tit for tat, tit for tat going on. And the whole point, the justice system is supposed to take that obligation from you. This was supposed to do. It’s supposed to take the obligation from you so that you can punish that person. And it stops there. Boom! That’s the idea behind it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it has other obligations now.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. But that obligation seems to be gone now.

 

Blair Cottrell: More or less. Like I sought revenge in a relationship that went wrong when I was young, which landed me in jail, and the justice system intervened and sort of kind of showed me a better way.

 

So it was good to me in that regard. But I gotta tell you, ever since I got involved in politics, I haven’t really seen much justice after that. I mean, you might know I headed up United Patriots Front.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I started that up with a bunch of other guys in 2015.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that was a new phenomenon at the time.

 

Graham Connolly: That grew fast!

 

Blair Cottrell: It was huge!

 

Graham Connolly: Why do you think that grew so fast?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s because social media at the time hadn’t really been used to promote a populist protest group that was nationalistic in essence, or patriotic in its foundations.

 

And also because I think I was relatable, I think the average Australian was able to resonate with me. And the amount of views we used to get on Facebook, I can see why certain elements of society, you know, government, police, were very nervous. Because I could hold my phone up to my face and film myself talking about a Muslim migrant who just shot someone in Parramatta [Sydney suburb/subcity] and this is why we need to stop Islamic immigration, for example. And that video would get millions of views! Millions of views! Amazing amount of reach! More reach than Channel 9, 7 and 10 would get on social media put together.

 

Graham Connolly: You moved so fast that time that they almost couldn’t ban you quick enough! The likes of Facebook and that you survived long enough on Facebook to get these millions and millions of views.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, if you want to ask the question, like, what was that actually put a stop to the United Patriots Front? How was it?

 

Graham Connolly: That was actually where I was coming at next. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, how did it? The rise of UPF, though, was crazy to me. Like, why do you think it was so successful? Like, why do you think, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It was new. It was right place, right time. I was involved in it. I knew what I was doing.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was always a bit of an ideologue, propagandist.

 

Graham Connolly: Did you do anything before UPF?

 

Blair Cottrell: No.

 

Graham Connolly: How did you know what you were doing? I guess is the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It was a combination of intuition and reading about people. I’ve always been interested in people, since I was young. Spent a lot of time in my own head thinking about how people, what makes people tick and how to speak to them. And I learnt how to communicate, not necessarily complex, but multifaceted politics to people in a way they would understand it. Right. I knew that people needed to, … People can always be told the truth! They just need to be told in a way they can understand. It needs to be simplified for them. Right. It’s not necessarily because people are stupid. They’re just mentally lazy. So they need someone to do the explaining for them. They need someone to do the research for them and then lay it out on the table in a way that’s easy to understand.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you think they also have to feel like it’s okay to accept the truth, that you’re representing them?

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course. But I think that’s why I was a good person to communicate the truth to people back in the days of UPF. Because I was a regular worker. I was carpenter. I was one of the people. I was working class. And there was really nothing about me that set me apart from the standard Aussie.

 

Graham Connolly: So you were a carpenter?

 

Blair Cottrell: I did an apprenticeship with my uncle when I started when I was 15. Finished when I was 19. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: What sort of carpentry work did you do at the time?

 

Blair Cottrell: All kinds. My uncle was a builder, residential builder. So I did house frames, lockups, fixes.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

[51:44]

 

Blair Cottrell: Small extensions and new homes, all sorts of stuff. But because he was a builder, he really used to push us. We would do a bit of bricklaying, we do a bit of plastering. We’d do a lot of overtime, bit of unpaid overtime for character building! You would call it. [chuckling] Because I was young when I started my apprenticeship, I used to ask my uncle:

 

“How am I getting home tonight?”

 

Because I couldn’t drive. I was too young to legally drive home.

 

Graham Connolly: Well you started when you’re 16 or something?

 

Blair Cottrell: 15 I started. 15, yeah. And he was going in the opposite direction so I’d ask him how I’m getting home. He’d say:

 

“You can piss in the gutter and swim!”

 

[Graham laughs]

 

So I used to throw my nail bag over my shoulder and do two hour walk home from the job site. Wouldn’t get home until, you know, 8 o’ clock at night sometimes, and I’d still go to the gym. My teenage years were very difficult but I’m grateful for it because it gave me perspective. It sort of worked the weakness out of me because I was a sook of a kid until I started work.

 

Graham Connolly: Really?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I was really over sensitive and I loved my mother a bit too much and used to spend a lot of time around mum. Dad was always at work and mum was very good to me. So I was probably over sensitive until I had that worked out of me from the age of 15.

 

Graham Connolly: What did your dad work at?

 

Blair Cottrell: My dad was a supervisor for a construction company in the city.

 

Graham Connolly: Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: But he used to do, …

 

Graham Connolly: Did he have a trade himself?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think he did. But because he started with the company young and he stayed with the same company for over 40 years, he did quite well.

 

Graham Connolly: Man. Being the son of a, … Because I see it nowadays, even the guys who work trade. Trade guys work six days a week, man! Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a full-time job. It’s a lifestyle.

 

Graham Connolly: It is a lifestyle. Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Your car becomes like a mobile business. You live out of it, you eat out of it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everything in the back.

 

Graham Connolly: And I mean they probably didn’t even get RDOs back, … Like they get RDOs now which is like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re working in the city on a union job, you get an RDO*.

 

[* RDO stands for ‘rostered day off’. It is a scheduled day off that employees earn by working extra hours over their standard work hours. They are often accumulated through extended shifts or by working additional hours over a set period, such as a fortnight, or a month. RDOs are part of flexible work arrangements that allow employees to take a day off in exchange for working additional hours over a certain period.]

 

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And we’ll talk about unions a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: I was going to get to that later as well. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But going back to UPF and to answer your question, the original question you asked, why I think it took off was just because it was new and right place, right time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Because you did just mentioned unions. Did you have troubles with the unions? Or did you seen how the unions operated, lead to UPF or lead to an awakening for you? What led you to want to start the UPF, or to want to do this?

 

Blair Cottrell: The unions didn’t have much to do with my ideology, really. And I wasn’t necessarily motivated so much by ideology as I was, by results. I wanted to create a popular counterculture against this whole mass immigration multicultural project.

 

And once the government or elements of government worked out that I knew what I was doing, and that I was against them, they took the necessary steps to shut the UPF down! And how they did that is interesting. Right. Have you heard of counterinsurgency?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You have? If the viewer doesn’t know what that is, it’s almost a method of warfare that was developed by US Army primarily, initially, to deal with insurgent groups, which were rebel Muslim groups in Iraq and Afghanistan during the War on Terror.

 

The primary purpose of counterinsurgency is to “isolate and disrupt”. Okay. Because the army figured out if they just killed these Muslim groups, members of people who were suspected of being members of rebel terror groups in Afghanistan, for example, if they just killed them, more members of the public would actually start joining the oppressed Muslims or the terrorists because they got angry at how the army was actually treating them.

 

And so they realised they had to create a different strategy. And they created counterinsurgency. Isolate and disrupt! Right. And nothing the government does these days is really new. Because the people in government right now, they’re not very creative or thoughtful. They just basically repurpose solutions that have worked well on other problems through recent history. Like, if you think about Hollywood, no one’s coming up with new ideas these days. They’re just repurposing and recycling old ideas to try to get the same result they used to get.

 

And the government’s doing the same thing with political dissidents, both individuals and groups in Australia. And it began with me. Okay. I was the first person in Australia to have my bank accounts disappear. I was the first person in Australia to be charged with what was essentially a thought crime for a Facebook post. I was in court for almost three years fighting a charge for “intent to incite ridicule” in a Facebook post.

 

Graham Connolly: Crazy, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: I was the first person to, …

 

Graham Connolly: Could I go back a step?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: How did you get red pilled? How did you get to this stage?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll get to that. Let me finish, this is a good point.

 

Graham Connolly: Okay.

 

[56:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: So my motivations, I’ll explain after this. But I was also the first person to be blacklisted from all social media. To this day, try to type my name into Facebook or Instagram. You’ll get a warning:

 

“This is a dangerous individual. Are you sure you want to continue?”

 

And you used to not get the option to continue a few years ago. They only added that recently. Right.

 

So this is all an example of repurposed counterinsurgency, which operates within the Australian government right now! This isn’t a conspiracy. They’re called Countering Violent Extremism, or CVE. And their job is to create this layer of plausible deniability for isolating and disrupting dissidents and critics of the Australian government and its policies.

 

What do I mean by that? Well, this is what the American government did to deal with, or the American army, rather, the US Army, to deal with the terror groups overseas. They had to make it look like the people were turning against the terror groups and they had to make it look like it was happening organically, that they weren’t actually responsible for it. Because for any insurgent group. When I say “isolate and disrupt”, well, what does that, what does that mean for you guys?

 

For example, you’re a member of a far-Right group, nationalist group in Australia. Your primary resource is not weapons, it’s not information, intelligence. Your primary resource is the people of Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: Correct.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

So the job of Countering Violent Extremism is to cut you off from the people of Australia! To stop you communicating with them. Internet censorship! And to stop you raising money from them. Bank account closures! To isolate you from the people, because the people provide you with manpower, financial resources and other resources that are essential to you as a dissident group.

 

So there are elements in the Australian government right now designed to cut you off from that, but they can deny that they’re doing it. Social media is censoring you:

 

“Oh, that’s the social media companies. It’s not us!”

 

It’s the CVE department, Countering Violent Extremism department within the government that’s directing the social media companies to ban you guys. And me too, still. Yeah, but they’ll say:

 

“Oh, it’s out of our hands. That’s a social media thing. Community guidelines.”

 

Something like that. Bank accounts getting closed:

 

“That’s a banking issue. Contact your bank. That’s not us.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: What else was the other thing?

 

Graham Connolly: They just decide to close your account, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. The police are setting you up for charges. They’re raiding you on no evidence. They’re trying to put you in jail:

 

“That’s a police matter. That’s not us.”

 

Graham Connolly: They use some sort of like money laundering, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, it makes it look like all of these independent agencies are turning against you on their own. They’re not! The Government’s directing them to do it!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s vicious corruption! It is what I’m saying in essence, and I’ll finish my point with this, because I know I’ve been talking about it for a while now, is., …

 

Graham Connolly: Take your time, keep going.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a government department which is repurposed counterinsurgency, which is treating critics of the government, both individuals and groups, especially organised groups, treating them as insurgents or terrorists! Right. So their job is to isolate and disrupt! And they’ll do anything to achieve their goals!

 

Graham Connolly: So I’m an insurgent? From the different perspective of this group?

 

Blair Cottrell: You are. And you’re being targeted, myself as well, we’re being targeted by organised counterinsurgency. They’re called Countering Violent Extremism. But they’re just the counterinsurgency department in the government, which exists purely to isolate and disrupt dissidents.

 

Graham Connolly: Crazy, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Crazy! But it’s happening.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, I mean, there’s plenty of violent extremism on the Left. In fact, it’s almost the only place that there’s violent extremism. But they’re not countering that.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s probably certain departments that supervise them or oversee what the Leftists are doing to try to make it look like it’s even, but it’s not.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think I’ve seen any Leftist groups experience the same sort of government intervention.

 

Graham Connolly: And Tim [Lutze] made this point. Not unless they are protesting the gun shows or the Gun Experts Expo or something like that. And then they go hard on them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s it!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s still not as hard as what we, …

 

But to answer your question about what actually shut down the UPF. It’s what I just explained.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The counterinsurgency department within the Australian government called CVE, that was basically developed in response to me and the UPF.

 

Graham Connolly: That was like such a grassroots movement, wasn’t it? Like, you didn’t really have structures in place. So what Tom is trying to build now is kind of, I would say, on the back of what lessons he may have learnt from what you did there with the UPF and stuff.

 

Blair Cottrell: Very much.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, it just goes to show that you laid the foundation back then, that has led to almost everything we see today with us on the steps of Parliament dressed in black and stuff like that. Like, literally, you laid the foundation for it back then.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom’s a very observant, smart guy. And he’s prophetic in a lot of ways.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what he’s dealing with, what we’re all still dealing with, but especially him, is a different threshold of political policing.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: One that I haven’t seen before.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t think anything that happens with Tom is an accident from. Even from his own perspective. Like you say, he’s so intuitive. I don’t think anything’s as rash as it might seem sometimes. Everything seems well planned out to me.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s maybe one or two rash things here and there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Here and there. But in general, the greater, he sees the big picture.

 

Blair Cottrell: He makes it work for him.

 

[1:01:41]

 

 

Graham Connolly: He does. Yeah, he does.

 

And I think he learnt a lot of lessons from you. And that’s why he’s started trying to create these structures. Like, you see a lot of the stuff we do nowadays with our nationals events. Like we basically have a calendar now. It’s almost like a whole new culture that he’s trying to build, but with structures in place, with leaders in place, with all these things, anti-fragility kind of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s more organised than I ever was.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s because that was just a pop up, almost.

 

Blair Cottrell: What he learnt from me was to just never give up and to keep your chin up no matter what! No matter what they throw at you, no matter what they do, no matter what they say, just keep moving forward.

 

Graham Connolly: You released a video recently where it was like. I would call it a tribute to Tom, basically, where you talked about Tom and who he is and how what you know about him.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s only scratching the surface. There’s so much more.

 

Graham Connolly: Right. That’s because I mentioned it to you and you were like:

 

“Fuck, I actually forgot loads of things and all!”

 

But I actually thought the video was perfect. It was perfect lens. It was perfect. And it just really hit the nail in the head about Tom, the kind of person that he is.

 

But if you want, do you want to say anything that you think you missed in that video that you wish you had said?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, about Tom Sewell. Tom and I have spent years together as good mates.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was the first person I met when I began speaking publicly, you know, giving my speeches about government corruption, the Leftists, all that kind of stuff. He filmed my first ever speech. I think it was in April of 2015.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Federation Square. And from then on, I never met anyone who was more of a soldier for nationalism. I mean, this guy just showed up to everything. And for the first couple of years, he didn’t say much. Funnily enough he says a lot now.

 

But for the first couple of years, Tom was just watching. And I didn’t realise back then, but now that I think about it now, in hindsight, he was just a sponge. He was listening to everything I was saying, he was watching everything we were doing, and he was just absorbing all of it!

 

Graham Connolly: It’s almost like lurking. Have you heard there’s a phrase on, like the online Right-wing sphere. There was a phrase that was always like, so saying a new guy come into like a forum or something, and he talked too much and he’d say the wrong things and he’d talk shit, like, say the wrong things, whatever. And the phrase was “lurk more faggot!” And it became a meme. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: If you lurk, you learn.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, like, and then it became a meme, like, I was on one of these forums and I didn’t say anything for months, not a single thing. And next thing I said my first comment and I was like:

 

“Look, I haven’t talked much and blah, blah!”

 

And the first comment back to me was:

 

“There’s honour in lurk more faggot!”

 

Like, [chuckling] so it was like literally complimenting me for having lurked. Like, that was the first time I got introduced to this word, this phrase, lurk more faggot! So Tom was basically lurk more faggot in real life! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: To an extent he was still dedicated. He was still a bit of an ideas man. I mean, we used to have long talks. We used to drive up to Sydney together to attend, and Canberra, to attend some of our protests that we hosted up there. And we had long chats. Thinking back to it, I think it was mostly me talking. Whereas these days it’s the opposite. If we’re going for a long drive now, he’s the one I’m learning from him. [chuckling] It’s so funny how he’s developed into a person who was once kind of a protege of mine, maybe, and now I’m the one seemingly learning from him. It’s like he’s evolved into this different sort of threshold of understanding. And yeah, I’m really proud that, … I’m just proud to know the guy. And it’s rough that he’s in jail.

 

 

Graham Connolly: You said to me, we talked a couple of weeks ago and you said to me they had like a little bit of guilt or something. You almost felt some guilt in that he’s in jail and that maybe if he’d never met me, or maybe that’s not the words you use, but it was, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think that.

 

Graham Connolly: Something along those lines.

 

Blair Cottrell: It might just be a cynical thought process.

 

Graham Connolly: Of course it is. And we all have it. It’s a natural. I think it’s a natural thing. I thought about it after, and I think it is a natural thing.

 

But also, he’s Tom Sewell!

 

[1:05:51]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think he would have gone for nationalism if we didn’t meet, like, whether we met or not, I think he would have ended up on that trajectory anyway, because he was already networking with people online, and that’s how he first met me. He just saw me posting on Facebook about going to this rally.

 

Graham Connolly: I think there’s so many people in the world, though, that never become who they’re meant to be. And I don’t think he can say that about Tom. If you look at Tom as a whole and look at what he does and look at, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But he tried, all he wanted to do, and this was the point I was making with the video that you’re talking about, where I spoke a little bit about Tom’s history. All he’s ever wanted to do is help people.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all he’s tried to do! He was good at helping people in the army. He figured that out. And so he left the army to help his old man out. Not even because he wanted to, really. And then once his old man was all good, he wanted to become a fire-fighter. You know, they told him, no. Everything I said in the video was true. Then he ends up working with disadvantaged children, but they kick him out because he’s got the wrong views.

 

And then he sets up a men’s club. He literally, with the payout he got. Because he got a discrimination payout after he was kicked out of whatever department he was working for when he was looking after kids and that. He got a 10 or $15,000 payout for discrimination. He spent it all on renting out a facility and filling it full of gym equipment and setting up a space to provide for other men who would experience similar discrimination. And that became Lads Society.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it got attacked! It was in the newspapers. I was a member of that for a while as well. And then out of that, he developed a National Socialist group because he saw that was his only choice as a result of all the harassment and targeted, you know, discrimination that he was still experiencing. And all he was doing, all he was trying to do from the start was help young guys out.

 

Graham Connolly: The man had so much integrity that the path was almost inevitable. You keep pushing a man like that, he’s not going to bend on his morals or his honour or his integrity. He’s just not going to do it. So you keep pushing another step, another step, another step and he’s just going to keep reacting to what they’re doing to him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s not always a good thing, but there is still honour in the personage of Tom Sewell and how he handles things.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just concerned, as you are too, I’m sure, about the threshold of political policing right now! I haven’t seen anything like it. I mean, people getting raided on no evidence for stuff they obviously haven’t done, set up on charges, just either put them in jail or to get them on bail conditions where they can’t protest. They can’t associate. The political policing in Australia right now is really hectic and, yeah, it’s concerning.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’m not really sure what to do about it, [chuckling] to be honest.

 

Graham Connolly: I joked recently because Jacob [Hersant] gave an interview outside court. They actually refused to let us in, we were in supporting Tom in court. And then we went for lunch, broke for lunch and we went down to the local cafe, had some coffee and on the way back up they blocked us all, wouldn’t let us into the courtroom.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: To support them, like, it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s been happening more and more now.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I don’t think they want it to be known that that much support is behind someone that they’re trying to set up and put in jail.

 

Graham Connolly: They’re trying to isolate him and it’s despicable to me! But Jacob was giving an interview to the media and I was like:

 

“You should say., …”

 

But I didn’t think of it afterwards. I was like:

 

“The next time you’re giving an interview, you should say, ‘I can’t give a Roman salute, so you’re just going to have to imagine it.’”

 

Blair Cottrell: [laughing]

 

Graham Connolly: Would they do you for that, though? Just imagine me Roman saluting! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You’re guilty of inciting, you know, offensive thoughts or images. [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: In [chuckling] somebody’s imagination. Yeah. You incited a Roman salute in somebody’s imagination!

 

But it’s getting there though, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, mate. It’s at the point now where I don’t want to be too much of a black pill, so I won’t explore it too much. But the sensation I’m getting is that we’re moving into very difficult times, Very difficult times in Australia for dissidents, for nationalists, and we have to stick with each other and stick by each other, because each other is all we’re going to have.

 

But you asked what red pilled me. What red pilled you was at Mein Kampff reading Mine Kampf?

 

Graham Connolly: To be honest, the first, … Because I think red-pill is actually a series of red pills, similar to Hitler’s story.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, there’s no single one.

 

Graham Connolly: No, I think similar to the Hitler stuff. When you read Mein Kampf, I was blown away because I was like it’s such a similar journey, because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Which translation did you read?

 

Graham Connolly: Dalton, I think.

 

[See: Rethinking Mein Kampf — by Thomas Dalton]

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that? What’s his name again? Dalton. I can’t remember. Not Tom Dalton. I know which translation you mean. I haven’t read that one, though. So I did. Ralph Mannheim.

 

[1:10:22]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. No, I didn’t do Mannheim. But I think we might have got, do we have Mannheim? No.

 

But 9/11 was my first one.

 

Blair Cottrell: 9/11. What about it? Specifically, the conspiracies?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I was studying.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see Loose Change?

 

Graham Connolly: I was studying architecture at the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: And like, you do a little bit of engineering in that as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you’re like:

 

“No way!”

 

Graham Connolly: So from day one, I was like:

 

“What? No way!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Are you saying that jet fuel can’t melt steel Beams? Are you anti-semitic?

 

Graham Connolly: Yes! [chuckling] I could get arrested for that! [chuckling] it’s getting that bad, isn’t it?

 

But, yeah, absolutely I am! Which am I? The first question or the second question? That’s the question here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember Loose Change documentary?

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t think I’ve seen Loose Change.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was one that kind of exposed a lot of the inconsistencies with the 9/11 story.

 

Graham Connolly: Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right down to the alleged plane pilots and everything. Yeah. How they weren’t really experienced. I won’t get into all the details, but I remember someone dropped a Loose Change, second edition, the DVD. I think it was around, 2003 or 2004. They dropped it in my letterbox. So some conspiracy theorist was going around, …

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: Burning DVDs and just handing them out to people. And I saw it in my letterbox and I thought:

 

“Yeah, I’ll give this a go.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Whoa!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Whoa! That was probably my first time where I was like. Because straight away I was like:

 

“There’s something wrong here!”

 

And I started searching. That was my first entry into the alternative. And then I realised there’s all this information out there. So it was my first introduction to conspiracy theories.

 

Blair Cottrell: You would have been about, what, 17, 18?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I was a little bit older. Yeah, I probably was 18.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I was a kid.

 

Graham Connolly: I think I was 19.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think I was 11. I got up that morning and I wanted to watch my cartoons. And same thing was on every channel. It was just news. And these buildings.

 

Graham Connolly: When was it? What year was 2001, wasn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sorry, yeah, 2001. Yeah. I would have been 11.

 

[See 911 links below in See Also]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I was 18. So, yeah, I remember I was in London at the time when I happened. I was in university over in England.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what were you studying in uni?

 

Graham Connolly: Architecture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, that’s right. And so that was the first one that got you into it.

 

Graham Connolly: That was the one that made me realise that there was this whole world of conspiracy theories.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, that was my first introduction to it, but it was me just searching, going, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s the same for a lot. It was the same for me, too. The first real conspiracy theory I got into was 9/11.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It didn’t start because somebody introduced me to the conspiracy theory. It was the other way around. I just started searching, going:

 

“This can’t be right. Surely there’s people out there, like me who don’t think that the official story makes sense!”

 

But what really got me on that was these engineering tutors, these engineers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Reporting the story, …

 

Graham Connolly: For years later, even, like for years, years later.

 

Blair Cottrell: It just wasn’t mathematically logical.

 

Graham Connolly: Some of the best engineers in the world. Like, I’d be talking to them and I bring it up in the conversation, and you could see them just get visibly uncomfortable, but just completely, what’s the word, cognitive dissonance?

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s still developing. I think the dancing Israelis thing only came out a couple of years ago. That was a big meme. So people are still uncovering more and more facts about how ridiculous the original story was.

 

Graham Connolly: The Building Seven things.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, the third building that just fell into its own footprint for no reason.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And they just happened to move the gold out of it just in time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Just absolutely insanity! So that was my first thing. Right. But that didn’t lead me anywhere, really. That was it. It was just like a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It opened the possibility in your mind, though, that there’s this whole other world of possibility.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And I just didn’t end up stuck in that other world, if you know what I mean. I came back, like that’s what I was going to compare it to, Mein Kampf. So with Hitler, he did the same thing. Like he’d take a red pill or whatever and then after a while, he’d kind of gaslight himself.

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And go back to being in the army for a little while. And then something else happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: You relapse. Every time you relapse, you relapse for a smaller amount of time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And something else happens then. And it’s the same bloody thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can pause for a second.

 

[1:14:38]

 

 

Graham Connolly: I can’t read it. Oh, okay. That’s all right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that how far in we are? Yeah. It’s all right.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s all right.

 

Blair Cottrell: It seems to have gone pretty quick. How long did you go with Tim?

 

Graham Connolly: Three hours all together.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Right.

 

Graham Connolly: But like we stopped for coffee and stuff like that and had a little break and then we just went back and but we did three hours all up.

 

So the first one was an hour and 15, and the second part was like an hour and 45. But I hadn’t even decided if we’d break this into two parts. If we just chat away and just whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. How you feeling?

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t mind. Do you want a cup of coffee or anything?

 

Blair Cottrell: Glass of water might be nice.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Just sparking water there as well, if you want.

 

Blair Cottrell: Or just straight water. Be all right. As long as it’s not tap water. If you have milk. I’ll have milk.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, Milk there. So that was my red pill journey, though. That was the start of it, was a 9/11.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: To be honest, I don’t remember then what the next one was or what the next. You know, it was just a gradual. I think it was the wars, the likes of the war in Iraq. Just not being what it seems. Then it was definitely the wars in Syria, the wars in Libya, all these wars that were, … I used to watch, I ended up on this website and it was called truthseeker.com. Literally I used to just go, anytime anything was going on, like there was a war in Syria, I literally just go to Google, the truth about Syria. And then you’d get all this shit and you go, the truth about Libya.

 

Blair Cottrell: You won’t get that on Google now.

 

Graham Connolly: Not anymore. No, not really. No. You got to know exactly where to go now.

 

Blair Cottrell: The original search engines in YouTube were awesome! That was kind of I remember I saw some of my first dramatized Hitler speeches on the original YouTube, back in the day. There was an editor called Norse Wolf. He used to put speeches by both Hitler and William Luther Pierce and even Mosley on occasion. He edited sort of a aesthetic kind of we have our edits these days, the boys make. These were some of the original edits and they were all out on YouTube. But all this stuff kind of disappeared around, 2016, I think. Maybe around, 2016, 2017, there was a big ban that came through. Maybe it was even before then. I just know that you used to be able to get as much Hitler as you wanted on YouTube. Pro Hitler content up until around, 2016, 2017. Then suddenly everything got banned.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. The old Internet was brilliant! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: For me, it’s not, I think the most, the point of awakening, if you want to say, you want to call it that. I don’t see my life as this great, you know, dramatic thing where I’m super important and I was awakened! I don’t think of it that way. I just came across Mein Kampf and I thought:

 

“Oh, that’s Adolf Hitler’s book. Adolf Hitler wrote a book. No one told me that!”

 

They talked about Hitler a lot in history class in high school, but no one ever mentioned that he wrote his own book. Like:

 

“Oh, that’s weird! Why didn’t anyone tell me?”

 

I thought:

 

“Well, this is the evil genius that almost took over the world and gassed all those people. And he wanted to create the blonde haired, blue eyed master race!”

 

Graham Connolly: Should be interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting book! Like why isn’t everyone reading this? Like so couldn’t pass up the opportunity. When I saw it on a bookshelf in Fitzroy in northern part of, it’s like the lesbian capital of Melbourne. I was working on an apartment job out there when I was 18 for this building company. Started reading it and to be honest, at first I was disappointed. I was like:

 

“This isn’t the book of an evil genius murderer!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Tim actually said the same thing. He was underwhelmed, like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I was like:

 

“What?”

 

I was like, he was a soldier first. He was homeless. You know, he lost his mum early in life and he’s trying to be an artist, then he’s a soldier. His chapter about propaganda is good. And the communists. He knew what the communists were doing. Oh, yeah. His ideas about race. The German people need to have their own space, their own country. Makes sense for Germans. I’m thinking:

 

“Where’s the gas chambers? Where’s the evil takeover the world part? It’s not in here!”

 

Graham Connolly: Doesn’t exist.

 

Blair Cottrell: And [chuckling] I’m thinking:

 

“Not only is this not a crazy evil maniac, this makes a lot of sense!”

 

Graham Connolly: No wonder to talk so much about him in school, but never asked me to read his book.

 

[1:18:53]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, they didn’t even tell me he had a book. You know what I mean? They told me that he constructed. Well, I remember in school because I’ve always been fascinated by engineering. I’m not much of an engineer, naturally, but I like really big structures and I really like to see how they put together. And as an architect and someone who studied it, you might share the passion.

 

And so when I heard about the amount of people that got gassed in homicidal gas chambers, I thought:

 

“Wow, those must be some hectic facilities. The Germans are incredible! I thought, I’d love to see those!”

 

Just like to see the complexity and the amount of information like engineering that went into something like that. To gas that many people and burn them all before anyone could see the bodies. I thought:

 

“That must have taken ages to build and how did they do it?”

 

And then they show me these little broken down shower cubicles with wooden doors and say:

 

“Well, this is where it happened.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“What!”

 

I always thought to myself in school, I thought:

 

“I’ll have to look that up later, like on the Internet or something, because there must be more to it. This couldn’t have been where it happened.”

 

And I still believed it because it was in the history books and they were telling me.

 

But then as I looked more and more into it, I couldn’t find the facilities that I was envisioning in my mind that could actually be possible of achieving that.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I was just like:

 

“This doesn’t make any sense!”

 

Graham Connolly: Eventually you end up, I suppose you ended up consuming The David Irving stuff?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not really. I just put two and two together. Because in Mein Kampf Hitler writes that:

 

“The great masses of the people will more easily be fooled by big lies than small ones, because big lies seem incomprehensible, that someone would put that much effort into a lie.”

 

Graham Connolly: My dog going mad there. [dog barking]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. He’s obviously hearing some intrusions, trying to get some attention for some reason. But Hitler explains the nature of big lies or big deceptions for the purposes of propaganda or to serve the interests of a specific group. But he explains it well in Mein Kampf. He uses, he says that most people tell lies in small matters like, “boss, I’m sick, I can’t come into work today”. Yeah, right. They don’t put a shitload into it. They don’t write books about it. They don’t go into universities and lecture about it. They don’t build whole institutions that are profiting billions of dollars around the world from it. Most normal people don’t do that!

 

And so when people see an institution, a whole industry that’s based on historical “fact”, well, they don’t suppose it would be a lie because there’s an entire-industry built around it! But what most people don’t realise, Hitler says, is:

 

“There are (((some people))) out there who do put that much effort into a lie and they do profit that much from it.”

 

It does work to their advantage to that extent.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you know what we don’t take into account, I think or we forget. And I certainly in Ireland and maybe it wasn’t as bad here, but my parents generation were naive! So they didn’t have the Internet. They would believe anything. They were superstitious. It’s not that long ago that people were very superstitious.

 

Blair Cottrell: You got to go easy on them though, because, …

 

Graham Connolly: 100%, I agree.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are just as naive. We just have access to more information.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s exactly right! Yeah. Because I just mean that like it’s not that long ago where the TV was invented, lights were invented. It’s not actually that long ago.

 

Blair Cottrell: Historically it’s a blip on the screen.

 

Graham Connolly: It blip on the screen, and people were superstitious even. Do you know what I mean? But like to believe all sorts of like don’t break the glass or the Mirror and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t walk under a ladder.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, oh, they literally believe, like my mother was superstitious. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard Irish people are very superstitious.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Again, not as much anymore. Because of the access.

 

Blair Cottrell: The world’s been revealed.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! The world’s been revealed. But back that time, the world was a bigger place. Like, you didn’t often travel further than the closest town.

 

Blair Cottrell: You felt like a tourist in the next town.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’d even go to the next town and people there would talk and act strange because everything’s so interconnected now. You see someone on TikTok, all the kids are watching someone on TikTok and then they all start acting and talking like that person on TikTok. And so all the kids from every suburb are dressing, acting the same.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Whereas back in the day, before the Internet, before social media, you go to the next suburb over, as I said, and everyone was kind of weird there.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s funny you bring that up because, where I grew up in Ireland, every little town and village had their own culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, so where I grew up, it was very, I said it even earlier, with soccer and football were the two, were the thing. They were big into sport, but everyone had to be funny. Everyone had to be able to take the piss out of each other. Like, that was kind of it just, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australia’s like that.

 

Graham Connolly: Drabs and quick wit was our thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think we’re like that because of the Irish influence.

 

Graham Connolly: If you enter the town up the road, they’re all into motor bikes. Like, so many kids, like, died on motor bikes. Literally had that many people die on motor bikes because that was their culture. Their culture was motorbikes and hunting.

 

[1:23:36]

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what it was? It’ll be one or two people in that town who were really cool and charismatic and they did motorbikes.

 

So everyone does motorbikes!

 

Graham Connolly: Everyone got motorbikes. The culture of that whole town like there was another town, the culture was literally affairs! [Blair bursts out laughing] Like, [chuckling] they’re known for having affairs and stuff. Like, it just becomes the culture of the town. Like you said, there was such a degree of separation between these places.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like almost every town back then had its idols.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: People that were idolised by everyone else in the town who influenced everyone.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But now the idols exist on the screens.

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: And so now everything’s more universal.

 

Graham Connolly: Which has made the world a much smaller place.

 

Blair Cottrell: It feels smaller.

 

Graham Connolly: It does feel smaller.

 

Blair Cottrell: As I said, I used to feel like more of a tourist even in the next town over. But now it’s like every suburb, every precinct almost feels like the same as the one I just came out of even when you go across the other side of the world. Went to England last year, already mentioned that earlier on. And it was different, but it wasn’t as different as I expected.

 

Graham Connolly: No. And you can get there even though it’s a long flight. Yeah, it’s a long flight to England. It’s a tough journey.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was tough, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But part of I think part of what makes things tough nowadays is everything’s rushed. So even though you’re flying there, it’s a rushed thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was the first international flight I took and I took one of the longest ones you can.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t sleep when I’m surrounded by strangers I don’t know, because my nervous system’s firing. How am I supposed to relax and go to sleep when I’m surrounded by Ahmed and Hajib and whoever else is around me on this, because I’m on an Arab flight as well. I think I went with Emirates.

 

Graham Connolly: You fly through Dubai?

 

Blair Cottrell: We went through, was it Dubai?

 

Graham Connolly: Abu Dhabi.

 

Blair Cottrell: Abu Dhabi! Yeah. God, what an experience that was! It smells like. What is it? It smells like spicy hot sand! Exactly how you’d imagine it smells. And there’s proper Muslims in Abu Dhabi airport. Like, they’re looking at you, like they’re going to cut your head off sort of thing.

 

So that might be presumptuous of me to say, but that’s what my instinct was telling me, the way they were looking at me.

 

Graham Connolly: Infidel!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right. But hey, I’m in an international airport. What do you expect, mate. And you know what I did when I got to Abu Dhabi airport, I thought:

 

“I’m gonna get a kebab! I’m in an Arab airport, an Arab country. I’m probably gonna have the best kebab I’ve ever had! Right? They’ve got to do good kebabs here, at least.”

 

So I found a kebab store at the airport. What a piece of shit it was! The meat was dry and crap. The bread was crap. We do better kebabs here in Australia than they do in the Arab airports. Well, maybe there’s some Arab street food you can get once you actually get out into the country. But I gotta say, I was really disappointed by the kebabs at Abu Dhabi Airport.

 

But anyway, …

 

Graham Connolly: The kebabs in England are probably better.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe. Hey, have you ever had., … You’ve had McDonald’s in England, all that sort of stuff. How do you rate the food in England compared to Australia? Much different? I think the dairy’s better. They got better Greener pastures there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, definitely have Greener pastures. Definitely! We got more water as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, the dairy’s noticeably better.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. We can hold a lot more head of cattle on the smaller acreage back in Ireland and England than here. I noticed that. In certain parts of Australia, I think, like at Gippsland, that’s pretty lush down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it depends on where you go. Australia is overall a much drier land.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s why, I guess when you get into like Gippsland, you do start to see cattle in the fields.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Because they got the pastures.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, a lot of Australia doesn’t have it. No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Had a Big Mac in England. They don’t peel their potatoes at KFC in England.

 

Graham Connolly: Don’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, English don’t like peeling their potatoes. So you get the potato peel in the chips, which I thought was weird because we don’t have that in Australia. The Big Mac I had was awful! I couldn’t even, … And that’s saying something for me, not to finish a piece of food!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’ll eat anything! I’ve got no dietary limitations. I’ll eat anything. And the beef was so stale and dry in the Big Mac in England, I had to throw it away.

 

Graham Connolly: In Ireland, I used to prefer Burger King, which is your Hungry Jacks.

 

Blair Cottrell: I never tried it there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, Burger King is really good! It’s much better at home than it is here, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we did try, that chicken place. What’s that chicken place? It’s famous for some reason. Was it Popeyes?

 

Graham Connolly: In England?

 

[1:27:53]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe it was Popeyes.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Popeyes Chicken. Maybe it is. I don’t know.

 

Graham Connolly: Could be. I don’t know. I know England has a lot more different places than Ireland, even.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, okay.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you spend much time in London?

 

Graham Connolly: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: When I was there, I was in Wolverhampton, but I had relations in London, so I spent like a weekend or four days up in London. And that was when 9/11 happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I was only up there visiting relations for a few days.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So no, I’ve been to London a few times, but haven’t spent much time there, though.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Wolverhampton, though, man! Fuck!

 

Blair Cottrell: What about it?

 

Graham Connolly: It’s like its own city, but it’s kind of like a suburb of Birmingham. It’s real close to Birmingham and it’s just rough! It is!

 

Blair Cottrell: In what way?

 

Graham Connolly: Just blacks!

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh. Even back then?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It was so bad, when I went to uni there, me and like seven other people from Ireland went from college in Ireland and went over there and so we stayed in the halls around. Probably should have rented a house or something like that.

 

But anyway, we stayed in the what they call the “halls of residence”, like, so it was kind of fun and all that sort of thing. But we were on the ground floor and you’d have like, say, eight rooms, so you’d have a corridor. You can go in the main door and then you’d have one corridor this way, one corridor this one. You’d have like six or eight rooms in each one each side of the corridor. And you’d have a main kitchen that you share. You could not leave your room with the window open for five minutes!

 

Blair Cottrell: They climb in the window?

 

Graham Connolly: They’d climb in the window and be gone with your laptop. And they did not care if you came back while they were in the room.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to fight him if you wanted it.

 

Graham Connolly: They just stab you!

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So rough, man!

 

So, like, you just wanted to go for a piss, close your window! Go for a piss, come back up, open your window.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well!

 

Graham Connolly: Fucking shit man! The only good thing about the whole time there was Wolverhampton had got it into the Premier League at the time. They just got promoted the year that we went there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: And so every weekend on match day, you could open your window and you could hear the atmosphere from the stadium. That was literally just around the corner. And that was kind of cool. I don’t know why I remember that, but that’s one of my best memories from Wolverhampton.

 

Blair Cottrell: I noticed a fair more black people in London than there are pretty much anywhere in Australia that I know of, …

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Birmingham, Wolverhampton, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s all there is. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think I ever went there. I went to Kennington. We stayed a couple of nights in Kennington, I think. But black people smoking marijuana in public, that was pretty common.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Around that region. And just very loud, obnoxious, you know, screaming at bus drivers and kicking doors because they weren’t opening quick enough! Just stuff like they don’t just, … I don’t know how to summarize it.

 

All I can say is the black people in England don’t seem to appreciate being in England very much.

 

Graham Connolly: No. They’re the same everywhere, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it in their nature to appreciate anything or do they just take advantage?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I don’t think it is. No, no, it’s a sense of entitlement, ungratefulness.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the main ethnic group you notice in Australia, and that’s not White? You know is in Australia that’s not White, the main ethnic group out here? Out here in your way anyway, where you live?

 

Graham Connolly: So here’s still pretty good. Yeah, just here now. When I first got to Geelong, all of Geelong was still White.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, you head down to the waterfront, White people!

 

Blair Cottrell: I know some Indians down there today.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, that’s what I was about to say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mostly Indians.

 

Graham Connolly: Indians and Muslims now down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep, yep.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, you get on there now and like, they’re playing their own music. So it’s like being in a foreign country. You know, you got all the barbecues down by the waterfront. It used to be always just White people down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: They love the waterfront.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, they love the waterfront. Now you go down on a nice, as soon as it’s a warm day, just flock to there. Take over all the barbecues, have their own music. And it’s the ding, ding, ding, ding! All this fucking shit music!

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re in a country that wasn’t, you’re in a country that was built by another ethnic group and you were a guest, you’d think you wouldn’t be so loud and obnoxious. I mean, that’s how we are when we go to other countries, isn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: 100%.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

[1:31:58]

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve travelled a lot and you’ve got a lot of respect when you’re in somebody else’s country, like Japan or something. You look around. These are not your buildings. The buildings do not invoke your blood memory, for example. Like, you know that you’re a visitor in these places. I can’t understand, like, even here, even though, like, I kind of mentioned it earlier, too, we were talking that all the towns, villages, the city, you go into the city, all the old buildings, they’re all Anglo-Celtic buildings. You know what I mean? It’s you know, they were built by your people. Even though I’m from Ireland, I come here. I walk the streets here. These buildings are built by my people, by the same blood that runs through my veins.

 

I couldn’t go to India and walk through Calcutta and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Feel the same way.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, and feel the same. And I don’t understand how they can do it. Like, I come here and I’ll never., … Like, I’m always going to consider myself Irish because I am Irish. I can’t just come here and then suddenly be Australian. Like, I came here when I was 23. I grew up in Ireland. I talked to Tim about this a little bit. I grew up in Ireland. I went to school in Ireland. Like, I said this to Tim, like, my daughter can be Australian. She’ll grow up here. She’s of the same blood as the founding stock. Her mother is Australian and I’m of the same blood as the founding stock. Even though I wasn’t born here. But my child will be. But I would never say I’m Australian. I’ve been here 15 years now, but I was here like 12 years before I even got the citizenship, before I even applied for the citizenship.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you are a citizen?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was gonna say, well, you could just say I’m an Australian citizen, but I’m Irish.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah, exactly! Which I am. That’s really accurate way of saying it. Right. But these Indians and stuff come over and they’re calling themselves Australian!

 

Blair Cottrell: You’d have to be really ashamed of where you come from.

 

Graham Connolly: And they are! That’s what it is!

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s also a sub 80 IQ affliction, meaning people who are a little bit less intelligent, they don’t have the humility to acknowledge that they may come from a lesser developed culture. And so they cope instead by demanding equality amongst people who are clearly better than them, rather than acknowledging that those people are better and just appreciating their position as a guest in that country. Instead, it’s a cope, a coping mechanism.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Because they actually think they’re better than you a lot of the time.

 

Graham Connolly: They do the same thing no matter where to go, though, then they’re Irish, they go to Ireland and they’re Irish!

 

Blair Cottrell: I almost think it must be an in-joke amongst themselves. They must go home afterwards and laugh at the fact that other Irishmen or Australians or Englishmen actually don’t say anything:

 

“We say that we’re English. We say we’re Australian. And they don’t say anything, those idiots!”

 

Graham Connolly: I think you’re right a minute ago. I don’t think they have the capacity for it.

 

Blair Cottrell: The smarter ones would.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the majority of them, I do think it’s a sub 80 IQ. Because you need to be cleverer than average at least to have the humility to acknowledge when someone else is actually better than you and not hate them for it. Right. So there’s two ways you can look at someone.

 

Graham Connolly: Jeez, the dogs are going off, after me. [dogs making a noise]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. There’s two different ways. There’s the common way of responding or reacting to someone who’s better than you in a certain field. And the common way is to develop copes to try to explain it away:

 

“Oh, he had a better upbringing. He had help from other people. There’s reasons why he’s better than me that make it not fair on me somehow and down with him. Poor me!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The other way, the less common way is to learn as much as you can from the person who’s doing better than you in a certain field. So:

 

“All right, this guy’s doing really well. His strategy, his methods, they must work. What can I learn from this guy? I need to talk to this guy!”

 

Especially if it’s in a field that you’re interested in developing in yourself.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So like the most people, most lower IQ people and most people are of lower IQ, they’ll just resent someone for being better. And I suppose that’s what most Indians do when they come to Australia. But cleverer folks will learn as much as they can.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah. Do you want to take a five minute?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sure.

 

Graham Connolly: So I can feed these bloody dogs.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you fed them already?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I did, but I only give them a little bit. They’re big dogs, the dog will eat three kilos a day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Really? The big one? That’s expensive dog!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. [chuckling] We can just leave that going and I’ll just cut it out when everything’s going. Do you want a coffee or anything like that?

 

Blair Cottrell: One more might help. Graham, if you can get it working. I might just stretch my legs.

 

[1:36:30]

 

Graham Connolly: That brings us to the end of part one. A huge thanks again to Blair for making the trip. Part one has covered a lot of ground, but this episode is not finished yet. In part two, we dive deeper into the real world cost of Right-wing activism. If you value these discussions, please like this video, share and subscribe to the awfully offensive. Thank you all for watching. Your support is what makes this uncensored content worthwhile. We’ll see you soon for part two.

 

[1:36:58]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/19/2025 = 32)

[Newest at top]

greenyfromoz97
1 day ago
Upload this on YouTube brother! These is nothing about this against community standards at all! This it the best best pod cast I’ve listened to in years
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 day ago
Thanks brother. Yea we’re going to set up a YouTube and see how it goes. Thanks for watching and Thanks for the vote of confidence.
1 likes

greenyfromoz97
1 day ago
Loving it, send my love back mate! Awesome podcast !!
1 like

JohlForbes
4 days ago
Very entertaining and nostalgic interview. Like two mates having a chat, good vibes, enjoyed it.
1 like

Girnigoe
5 days ago
Outstanding! An American, here. You men in Australia are at the “cutting edge” of White Nationalism, National Socialism, and activism in general, though a new generation has also risen / is rising in America, it appears. Quite a change from back 20-25 years ago, and here’s to that! Maybe it’s that Australia is smaller, with mostly a more homogenous population, thus less distraction and gate-keeping fake conned-servatives about. Whatever the case, never slacking and don’t give up the ship! More folks than you might imagine have their eyes upon you world-wide. Hail victory and down with ZOG!
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
5 days ago
Thanks for watching brother. Our fight is worldwide. The White man must rise up everywhere. And we will.
1 like

TTFOLEY1914
5 days ago
Nandos chicken I reckon
0 likes

Sieger88
Supporter
5 days ago
A lot of the things Blair complains about is simply due to the fact that our race developed in Northern Europe, we weren’t really meant to live anywhere else.
1 like

akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
6 days ago
I didn’t think you guys would eat a Big Mac. How about the Finkelstein interview about the Big Macs: https://archive.org/details/InterviewWithRabbiAbrahamFinkelstein/Interview+with+rabbi+Abraham+Finkelstein.mp4
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
6 days ago
Yea i don’t eat Maccas these days. I doubt Blair would very often either.
1 like

whatthehehe
6 days ago
PATRIOTS!
3 likes

WhiteBitchTripleSix
Supporter+
6 days ago
“Are you anti-semetic?” YES
3 likes

GigaChud7
6 days ago
You should do a series on the sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland, I’d love to hear the perspective from an Irishman who has our beliefs.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
TimLutze
6 days ago
I agree. Could invite Justin Barrett on for it.
3 likes

Jenny3819
Supporter
6 days ago
Great conversation.
2 likes

SpeedMaker
6 days ago
South Park did an episode of earth being a tv show. Aliens the “Jewzians” controlled all the media in the galaxy. They we’re going to cancel earth. The boys used sexual blackmail to save the planet. I’m not kidding. The episode is called “canceled and is almost 20 yrs old.
2 likes

Chucktt
6 days ago
I didn’t know Blair liked Metallica. Would he like the Load era?
1 like

birdhouse456
6 days ago
Blair’s grandfather reminds me if my uncle. Farmers are used to doing everything by themselves. If they waited for help it would never get done, and they’d be broke.
3 likes

Seanybruv
6 days ago
54:34 – 59:45 this was such a good point
2 likes

Seanybruv
6 days ago
41:30 no animal can directly look at the sun without serious eye damage, there’s no evolutionary adaptive advantage in looking at the sun, the benefit from the sun is light in general, for instance you don’t need to stare into a ceiling light to get the benefit of the light it gives, any animal that tried to stare at the sun would go blind and not pass on their genes. It is the driving on straight roads that is the unnatural thing in that scenario you gave, not the inability to look at the sun. Our early Human ancestors became hairless in tropical climates as a way to regulate body temperature through sweat while endurance hunting and travelling. Most humans have a lot of melanin to protect skin from UV damage as they stayed near the equator. By the time humans or our early human ancestors got to Europe they had already lost their hair, but eventually lost the melanin producing genes because that far north and in a cold climate the UV exposure is a lot less, so we needed light skin to get get adequate vitamin D. It was too fast of a shift in environment to just start growing fur again, so we needed to be innovative to survive in the cold, only those who were smart enough to survive would pass on their genes, part of the reason why Europeans are the most intelligent and innovative species.
3 likes

dailydose_meat
6 days ago
Great show! Blair has to be a regular on the show!
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
birdhouse456
6 days ago
he always muses on the most interesting topics.
0 likes

MonThirteen
6 days ago
Here I was thinking I was going to learn things I didn’t know about Blair but it’s awesome I got to learn alot about you too Mr Connolly. Both very interesting men. Love the fireside chats.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
6 days ago
Thank you I appreciate that. You can tell Blair is a kind and humble man and he’s naturally interested in other people. He was interviewing me as much as I was him and it made for a fun chin wag by the fire.
5 likes

heman1488
Supporter
6 days ago
Awesome podcast! Blair is an Australian icon and patriot.
8 likes

Angelalee0
6 days ago
UPF grew so fast because of you Blair. Your passion and charisma was something unlike anything I’ve seen. Your speeches and your presence made people come together. Those years were some of the best.
8 likes

Dimma1313
Supporter
6 days ago
Great show. Tag teaming questions….love the coexistence between Irish Catholics and Protestants in the Republic.
5 likes

mike33t
6 days ago
Soo good
1 like

esolily
6 days ago
Hail the Connolly clan
8 likes

TTFOLEY1914
1 week ago
Wow ,loved this.amazing chat best I’ve enjoyed in years.offaly was gd with the zoo theory stuff too.interesting shit
11 likes

Laker2103
1 week ago
Great video lads
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Jacob Hersant: The never ending tide of non-White immigration is drowning us! We are but 25 million in Australia and New Zealand, ten thousand miles from our brothers in Europe and surrounded by a Third World coloured masses. Everywhere we look, we see the foreign faces leering with thoughts of taking their land!

But make no mistake about it, they’re guests here and they’re unwelcome! It’s our civilisation! These islands belong to us, and we’ll fight for them! That’s what they’ll never understand. These scum that leave their kind to parasitise off us! With the nerve to insult and make demands of us in our country!

Yet what do they offer us to return? They can only pollute our blood and dishonour the estate our ancestors left us. The time has come to set us back! No more apathy! No more patience! No more tolerance! Get out! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Mass deportation now! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Shut up you race traitor! Hail victory! Hail victory!

 

Joel Davis: Just realised my mic was muted.

 

Another show Thursday night.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was going to tell you bro, you’re muted.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Thursday night, August 1, 2024, 8:30 Australian Eastern Time. So another show. Tom can’t make it tonight. He’s got a family engagement. I was actually going to get Jacob Hersant, but didn’t quite work out. I might do a stream with him separately to discuss some things in the future, but it’s going to be Blair and I this evening.

 

And yeah, Joel and Blair show has Joel and Blair on it, so should be an interesting show. I got one Superchat from Ukrainian Groyper that said:

 

“Hey, Joel, they banned your Telegram channel for the iPhone users.”

 

Yeah, I got my Telegram channel got App blocked on both just like ten minutes or 15 minutes before we went live on the stream. So that kind of sucks! I might have to make a new Telegram as a result. It’s kind of inexplicable. I don’t think I really posted anything outrageous lately in comparison to what I generally post, so don’t know why that happened, but once it happens, you can’t reverse it.

 

Like it happened to Tom Sewell’s channel. And there’s no appeal process. I mean, you can still access my Telegram if you download the a directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone or on the web a if you use Telegram on a computer, on a desktop. If you’re on an iPhone, basically, you can’t access Telegram without the blockages that they put on certain channels without going through the browser.

 

So that’s quite annoying for Apple users.

 

And so it’s kind of just annoying in general when you get App blocked because it kind of takes out maybe a third of your audience from being able to see your channel.

 

So maybe more so that really sucks, but it is what it is. We soldier on!

 

But yeah, Blair, how are you feeling this evening?

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Fine. I actually saw your channel get censored because I shared the link for this stream. It was visible. I was using an Apple device when I shared it, and then I checked it five minutes later and I couldn’t see it anymore. So I said:

 

“Bro, you’ve just been Apple banned!”

 

And it’s pretty annoying because it reduces your channel traffic by at least 50% because at least half people out there are still using iPhones. It’s iPhone technology is good. It’s easy, and so it draws in the people who want to be using the easy services.

 

But you can make a Joel Davis alerts channel like Tom did, just to keep everyone., … You can keep using your main channel and just make, like, a secondary alerts channel that’s not censored, that can still reach people. The amount of people who are using Telegram, dissidents, people who are interested in nationalism, seems to have reduced somewhat since those lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

 

Joel Davis: Because Twitter was bought by Elon Musk and Twitter is just a better platform now.

 

Blair Cottrell: Definitely! Everyone’s moved over to X. Telegram is still a reliable alternative, but it seems to be most of the traffic is moving through X at the moment. So Telegram is still a sort of corner alternative platform, and you’re still allowed to post on X, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, my Twitter’s fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t see the point in having one, like, two different channels.

 

And, I mean, I’ll keep the other one up for a little while I transition, but it seems better to just make a whole new channel. And I’m sure the majority of the audience that actually check the channel will probably move over.

 

[06:12]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s annoying that you don’t have any information about why you’ve been censored. There’s no appeal process. You don’t actually understand what’s going on. Like, you’re just kind of targeted because of who you are. But that’s the way censorship seems to roll out these days. It’s like you didn’t really say anything specifically that they’re concerned about. It’s just everything you believe and who you are, that’s the problem.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not the Telegram platform either that makes a decision. I think it’s like the a itself, like, Google and Apple impose it upon Telegram in order for them to have an a on the a store. So, like, what are you supposed to do? Appeal the ban to like, Apple and Google, it’s so convoluted.

 

So, yeah, there is no recourse. It’s the probably the main issue with the Telegram app, which is otherwise quite good, quite reliable. There have been instances where people have been banned outright from Telegram, but that’s, I think, almost always because they’re outright advocating calling for like a genocide or something quite explicit in a quite explicit way or something like this. And even still, you can usually get away with that kind of thing.

 

Or they, like the state, like specifically requests Telegram to take a particular channel down. I believe that probably is what happened to Tom’s first channel that was taken down. Um, it was probably literally like the Australian security services that requested it of Telegram.

 

But that is quite rare. So in this instance, that’s not what happened to me. I think what happened is probably just getting mass reported by the various political enemies that we have.

 

And eventually it’s succeeding.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have made something of a conscious effort to not get Apple banned by Telegram. And so far it seems to have worked. The effort I have made is just not to post that much.

 

And then when I do posts, I word things in such a way where it’s not so explicit or vulgar. You’ll notice that I go through periods where I’m like making a lot of content and then I calm down for a while and go through a rest period. This is for a couple of reasons. Like recently, I haven’t been posting much content because work’s picked up for me and I’ve needed to make some extra money because I was a bit behind in my personal life.

 

But I also don’t mind taking a break because it just kind of takes the heat off you. The all seeing eye of international jewry, you might say, kind of just overlooks you because you’re not really posting for a while. Then you can pop up again and make some videos for a couple of months. And you can take a break again for a couple of months. It seems to have worked so far, but I could be wrong. They could just target me next and I’d just be eating my words.

 

So I don’t know.

 

But the point is that I am concerned about being censored. Unfortunately, that’s just the game we’re in. And I try to balance my posting in such a way where I’m less likely to be censored, although I probably still will be eventually.

 

It’s a very frustrating game we have to play with these platforms, but it’s just the way it is.

 

The worst thing you can allow censorship to do is affect your own thoughts and perspective, though censorship can have that effect. If you’re so geared towards avoiding censorship, you can actually start changing your own thoughts and words. And, well, if you change your words enough to suit censorship standards, you’ll end up thinking differently.

 

And I think it can then have an impact on your psychology and even on your fundamental philosophy and perspective of the world. It’s very important not to let censorship do that.

 

But we obviously opened up this stream with a pretty cool video. Really good video, actually. I think it’s sick! Jacob’s peech. Jacob Hersant and some kind of flash activism. When did this occur? Joel? This particular rally? Was this recently?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So we marched on Saturday, a bit after 03:00 pm. I was there. Like, the rule basically is, and this is actually isn’t what my preference is, but what the current decision is in the group, is that we should have uniformity. All of us should have balaclavas on, except for the one speaker who’s going to do the speech. In this instance was Jacob. In the past, it has been Tom.

 

And I think actually, in one rally, maybe a smaller one, I think maybe Tim Lutz actually was leading that one and went mask off for that rally.

 

But personally, and this is how some of the prior rallies went, they had basically anyone who doesn’t care about being doxxed, who’s already maybe a known figure, would have their face out. Everyone else would have to mask on. But the argument is that breaks down the kind of uniformity. The idea is to have this idea of anyone could be in the march, and to create this certain kind of Enigmatic vibe. I get the logic behind it.

 

So I had a mask on, as everyone else did other than Jacob. I was actually standing next to Jacob for the majority of the rally.

 

[11:25]

 

 

So basically what happened was that we formed up near the Immigration Museum, and for those who don’t know Melbourne, the Immigration Museum is just down the road down Flinders Street from Federation Square, which is a kind of prominent point in the kind of middle of the city, across the road from Flinders Street Station, which is, I think, the biggest train station in the city of Melbourne.

 

And so the objective was to basically form up at the Immigration Museum, snap a photo at the front of it, and then march down adjacent to the Yarra river, which runs through the centre of Melbourne down to the Federation Square, where we would kind of form up and do a speech and so on, make a little bit of a scene. There’s a lot of foot traffic around there, although it was quite a dreary day, actually. It was raining on and off. When we marched, the rain had died down, but it was periodically raining on and off, and it was quite cold, so there wasn’t as much foot traffic as you’d usually get.

 

But nevertheless, there were people about.

 

And so we formed up there in a couple places, and Jacob, you know, gave some speeches and we did some chants. Just made a bit of a scene, as we customarily do. Then we kind of Marched across the road, formed up in front of the train station. And as we formed up in front of the train station, I started to notice the police had started to react. And cop car after cop car was pulling up, and more and more police were forming up into a larger and larger blob.

 

And I said to Jacob:

 

“We probably want to get moving, [chuckling] because it looks like they’re about to kind of set upon us.”

 

But Jacob had other ideas and just kind of got on the front foot, [chuckling] kept yelling into the megaphone, and ultimately the police targeted him. So they must have been about eight or ten police, and they just kind of surrounded Jacob, grabbed onto him, said:

 

“Jacob Hersant, you’re under arrest!”

 

And just all grabbed him instantly.

 

So there wasn’t really much that could be done to prevent that without committing a crime and, like, violently resisting arrest.

 

So that was at the point at which we decided, let’s get the hell out of here. Because what’s the point of all of us getting arrested? We basically already finished the march at that point.

 

So we started moving off as a group, and we got out of there. The police grabbed on to some of us, including me, and just kind of like, just pulled my sleeve away, and they kind of gave up trying to grab us, and we all left, went home.

 

So that was the situation. But Jacob was arrested. They didn’t actually charge Jacob yet. They took him into the police station and processed him and threatened to charge him with this crime called “grossly offensive behaviour”, which is a crime in the state of Victoria. Most other states in Australia don’t have this as a crime. It’s actually quite a recent addition to the Crimes Act of Victoria, and in my opinion, is a totally ridiculous law. I mean, what is “grossly offensive behaviour”? This is such a vague and general notion.

 

I think, actually, we talked about up the stream before. I think Tom talked about the infamous so-called Dick Pusey incident. This guy, Richard Pusey was his name. I believe he had some interaction with a police officer. I think he got pulled over for speeding while high on cocaine or something like this, and the police officer got hit by an oncoming car. I believe. I could be misremembering this, so apologies if I get the details slightly wrong.

 

And I believe he kind of had a really callous reaction of filming him on his phone and laughing at him, rather than aiding the police officer, I think might have actually died. And this was considered such a horrible thing, but it wasn’t a crime to laugh at a dead police officer. So they brought in this so-called grossly offensive behaviour law, I believe, as a way to put something on the books so that when someone engages in particularly “callous and heinous behaviour”, they said at the time that they could go after them.

 

But in this instance, the pretext is a political march. Now, in Australia, we do have an implied right to a political free expression under the Constitution.

 

So if they do decide to try and charge Jacob with this crime, we’ll see them in court. And I would anticipate that we would have a good chance, actually, of success. And that would be fantastic, actually, if they would charge Jacob, because then we could attack this in court and basically try and maybe even countersue the police for denying us our political constitutional rights. But that would be a very long process.

 

And they still haven’t charged him yet. I guess they’re still weighing up whether they think it strategically makes sense, because what they have done, basically, if they don’t charge Jacob, is that they’ve invoked a law that probably is unconstitutional and shouldn’t really be applied in this context anyway, to a political rally. There’s no precedent for it.

 

But then if they don’t actually place the charge, they don’t actually have to defend this in court, but they can still use that as a pretext to make an arrest and break up the rally and basically prevent us from engaging in our, what is lawful political activity. So it just shows the lengths that the state is willing to go to mess with us, really, where we weren’t doing anything that required police intervention. We were literally marching around peacefully, giving speeches, making chants with a sign with a big banner that said, Mass Deportations Now!

 

At the RNC [Republican National Convention] in the United States, a week or two ago, there were a bunch of boomers holding up Mass Deportations Now signs in the crowd while Trump was speaking and stuff, and other people were speaking at the Republican National Convention. This is a mainstream political idea. Senator Malcolm Roberts of the One Nation party from Queensland, he called for mass deportations on Twitter a few months ago.

 

So we weren’t really engaging in rhetoric that was particularly extreme, even by our own standards! So this, to be considered grossly offensive, is basically crossing a line where now basically they want to say that it’s illegal to advocate for a political position, that, I wouldn’t say that maybe the majority of Australians would agree with, but a very substantial minority of Australians, if polled – haven’t seen any polling on mass deportations in particular – but I would anticipate there would be a significant portion of the public that would support such a thing. And regardless of the percentage of the public that would support such a thing, we’re supposed to have political rights and freedoms under, quote, unquote, “liberal democracy” in this country.

 

So it was a particularly egregious act of political policing. And we will look at probably what we can do legally about this.

 

[18:23]

 

 

But in addition, this law is also being used in a couple other applications. I think it’s being used to go after people who did the Roman salute. I think Nathan Bull is one of the members, Nathan Bull and Michael Nelson, who infamously threw Roman salutes in the city while wearing a provocative T-shirt which had like a Chud Jack on it and said:

 

“6 million. That’s a bit much, mate!”

 

We’ve covered this on the show before. This was one of, before the Roman salute was made illegal under these more recent laws that they’ve brought in to ban the Roman salute and the swastika and so on in public display.

 

But this was before those laws, so they’re saying:

 

“But it was grossly offensive behaviour.”

 

So that’s now before the courts. So those court cases are active. I anticipate there’s going to be a big legal battle against this idea, this notion of “grossly offensive behaviour” as a way to stifle political speech.

 

And I think it’s important that we maybe try and reach out to some of the libertarians. Some of the libertarians don’t agree with us on a lot, but supposedly they care about political freedom of expression. And so insofar as they do care about these things, it will be consistent for them to actually come and defend it in this instance.

 

So if anyone is out there listening, who’s in the libertarian sphere, or who has associates in the libertarian sphere, or who’s a lawyer who wants to help, who wants to give legal advice or whatever, get in contact, because this is really where the battleground for Australian free political expression is going on.

 

I mean, even from a non-nationalist perspective, if they can successfully implement this law to stifle our political speech, well, then what’s next? Then they’ll move on to the next controversial thing and the next controversial thing. They could use this under who knows what pretext. You know, you saw how tyrannical the state was during Covid against the Covid protesters.

 

The jews are now coming out and calling for the pro-Palestine protesters to face kind of legal repercussions. But who knows in coming years what pretexts and what political context they could try and extend this to, if they can successfully use it against us. So even if you don’t agree with our politics, you should come to our aid in this instance and come to our support.

 

But overall, I think the rally was a great success. Videos circulating from the rally accumulated almost a million views online over the past few days.

 

So that’s been very good to see a lot of public support. Even on the day, there was a lot of people that yelled out support at us, beebed their horns and put the thumbs up out the window of the car as we were walking down the street. There were some people that were filming us and they had kind of friendly expressions and so on.

 

Yeah, there were some Lefties that also had something to say as well, as you would expect in the middle of Melbourne. It’s a very Left-wing city.

 

But I would say the public reaction was pretty balanced.

 

A lot of people were just kind of interested, like:

 

“What is this?”

 

And what’s interesting as well that I find is that in these kinds of things, the non-Whites never have anything to say. Non-Whites just kind of like scurry past, whereas the, you either get White Leftists who yell out something negative or normal White people who give, like, a positive reaction.

 

So that’s kind of interesting.

 

But yeah, the idea with the rally was to do something that was kind of get in, march around, get out. We almost succeeded in doing that other than the Jacob Hersant arrest.

 

But maybe the Jacob Hersant arrest was in the grand scheme of things for the greater good, because maybe it’ll give us a chance to fight an unjust law here. And also it was all over the news.

 

So maybe that’s for the best to kind of get the message out that we’re out there and operative. So overall, I think we consider the rally to be a great success, and on to the next one.

 

But what do you think about all this, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I just wrote down a few points that I’ll make and a couple of questions for you as well.

 

But my take was that I was really impressed by the ferocity of Jacob’s speech. I’ve known Jacob since he was a kid. He was always smart, witty, loved to laugh, loved to joke. But I didn’t know he had that passion, that fire in his belly that I heard in his voice in the speech that he gave. And I was inspired! I was roused by it! It was a really good speech, and I’m really glad that he’s putting himself out there, like that. It was ballsy!

 

That’s what I said on my Telegram channel when I shared it’s ballsy stuff! Considering the current political climate and considering the fact that enemies to your country seem to have all the resources, to just throw yourself out there and speak your mind, stand up for what you believe and point out the truth! Because everything that Jacob said in that speech was the truth! It’s how things are.

 

But at this point, from what you’ve said, the information you’ve given about the day, it seems like Victoria police have just moved you on and haven’t formally charged you with anything criminal at this point. And Victoria police in Australia, they have the power to move protesters on if they believe it will prevent an incident. So they can just say:

 

“Oh, we believe there was going to be a violent incident, so we had to move them on to keep the peace.”

 

The thing is, though, they can’t really move you on if there’s enough of you that you can stand your ground and you don’t move on.

 

So if you can make these kind of flash protests more regular, to the extent where you’ve grown to two or 300 participants, at that point, the police couldn’t really move you on without excessive force and without making a real scene.

 

So I think maybe that could be the goal. You want to grow this kind of thing to the point where the police are forced to facilitate your rallies and you become a legitimate, regular protest, that happens in Melbourne. Because there’s heaps of regular protests that happen in Melbourne. And for that reason, in Melbourne, I, …

 

Joel Davis: I believe 21 protests a weekend!

 

[24:38]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: And many of them are much more aggressive than the protest you guys had.

 

So I think for that reason, there’s a lot for the police to think about if they’re going to charge you with some grossly offensive conduct, because if they’re going to charge you, they’re probably going to have to think about charging other protesters with something similar, and they’re going to be going up against all of Melbourne protest culture eventually. And there probably exists at least a few legal precedents where protesters have won against government intervention or overreaching, because there’s a lot of rights in Melbourne for public protest and political protest. It’s why everybody comes to Melbourne to host their protests.

 

There’s people in Melbourne from all over the world protesting about some country that I’ve never heard about. I walk through Melbourne and there’s these little, like, islander, Asian looking people holding some banner or flag that I’ve never even seen before, and they’re complaining about some dictator in their country in Melbourne. And I’m thinking, I don’t even know what’s going on here, know who these people are. That’s what Melbourne’s known for, right?

 

So, like I said, what I was getting at is it’s going to be a bit of a minefield for the department, Department of Public Prosecutions to successfully convict you guys of a criminal charge just for peacefully protesting. Because that was your intention, right? Your intention was to host a peaceful protest. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. If they were going to charge anyone, it would exclusively be Jacob, because the rest of us literally walked around without saying anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They could claim that something Jacob said or did was specifically offensive. So they could then argue that you’re not being charged for protesting, Jacob himself is individually being charged for something that he did, but nothing that he did or said seemed overly inflammatory or illegal.

 

So I don’t know how they gotta go about doing that. Like I said, it’s gonna be a lot of work for the prosecution to actually put this into practice. But they may try. I don’t think they will. It’s going to be too hard for them, I think. But they may try because they may want to get a precedent, a foot in the door, something they can use against these other protesters, namely the pro-Palestinian protesters who the jewish lobby and jewish groups in Australia who are very upset with these protesters, and they probably want some sort of legal precedent to work with towards shutting these protesters down as well.

 

So for that reason, the prosecution might actually, police prosecution might try to put a case together. However, I think it’s going to be pretty easy to defend against it.

 

As I said, though, this kind of activism, if it’s made more regular, it will normalise it. And then you can potentially grow your attendance to the point where you’re protected by your own numbers. And that’s the immediate thing that comes to mind for me, I don’t really have much more to add other than that. I was really kind of shocked and impressed by it. Like I said, it was really ballsy. Jacob has the fire in his belly, and, yeah, it was cool to see someone just speaking their mind on the street. You got to admire that. It doesn’t even matter if you don’t like this kind of activism or politics. You got to admit, it takes balls to do that in this day and age, in our current political climate.

 

So it was cool to see.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think people will criticise. They say:

 

“Oh, well, normal people might be a little freaked out by the masks, and why do you say mass deportations? Why don’t you go for a more toned down message and so on?”

 

And it’s well, there’s ample opportunity for anyone who wants to do that, to do that kind of thing. The objective, the main objective of mobilising in the way that we did is to try and appeal to a specific niche, to appeal to people with a more aggressive, militant mindset, people who want the whole enchilada. People who want the style that we’re putting forward, because we want to recruit those kinds of people into our organisation to get bigger. But also we want to create a kind of forceful expression of willpower.

 

Because the largest problem that we face as White people is not that we don’t have the correct marketing strategy for how to dress up our politics or that we don’t have the right arguments or, … The problem is that most White people are fucking pussies! That’s the problem. That’s the fundamental problem!

 

And until White people stop being pussies and start getting angry and start getting focused and organised and start putting our willpower into practice in the world and start manifesting our will in an outward way, in an ostensible way, and taking the challenge to the system. Nothing is going to change. Because the all these other races and all of our enemies, they, at the moment, laugh at us! They can’t believe how easy they have it, that we are just allowing them to run over us like this.

 

[29:38]

 

And basically, all the immigrants pouring in, the anti-White agenda infecting all the major institutions, the way in which they sap White men of their dignity, the way that they strip White women of any kind of safety or civilised security that they can expect when they’re out in the public. They can’t believe that we’re letting them get away with it. They can’t believe that we’re sending our kids to school where they can be picked on by gangs of Arabs or blacks, and the teachers are going to propagandize them with all this nonsense about how evil their ancestors were. They come to our country, they have no gratitude. They then tell us that:

 

“Well, it isn’t your country anyway. You stole it from the Aboriginals! And White people, you’re all convicts and so on.”

 

You’ve heard all the talking points. There’s no respect! And you only get respect in this world when you demand it. No one’s going to give it to you. And the same thing is true when it comes to political power. The same thing is true when it comes to political support. No one is going to support a political movement and be willing to make sacrifices and put their life on the line. I don’t mean necessarily die, but just make sacrifices, put in money, put in time, potentially take damage, maybe get fired from a job, maybe lose certain opportunities lose certain friends.

 

People aren’t going to be willing to make those kinds of sacrifices if there isn’t a leadership, if there isn’t a kind of Spearhead of people who have balls! Who have determination, who make them believe these guys are going to be going at it till the end. These people are completely committed. Their hearts are pure. They care for the cause. You know, you have to instil that confidence in people to make them follow you.

 

And that is true on a smaller scale in terms of just building our current movement, but also on a larger scale upon trying to convince the public that there is a far-Right that can actually do something, that actually can mobilise enough numbers that it can actually protect them in some way from what is happening.

 

Until we become a horse that’s strong enough to take the fight to the enemy, who’s going to back us? You know, you’re backing a losing horse at the moment. So the only reason people are going to back us is because we light a fire of passion in them and they really resonate. And that’s basically what we were trying to do on the weekend. We’re trying to say:

 

“Look, there’s 40 of us out here.”

 

I mean, that’s just the Melbourne guys. There’s people all around the country. And not all the Melbourne guys showed up. But we got 40 guys in the street this weekend. Wouldn’t it be better if it was 400? Wouldn’t it be better if it was 4,000? Well join us! And then eventually it will be.

 

And then when it’s 4,000, people see 4,000 people in the street, then they start believing in something quite different. They start actually taking the message very seriously. And it seems as though it’s a message that has force, manpower behind it, and it will make people believe.

 

And so when the time comes where there’s something that needs to be responded to, like what we’ve seen. I want to talk about what’s happened in England with the horrible stabbing murder of those three young girls by that African. And he stabbed a bunch of other children, like, between the ages of six and ten. I think the rest of them, hopefully, are going to make it. I don’t actually know the full update on all of their conditions, but he killed three little girls, injured I don’t know how many more, eight or nine more or something. And the English are in the streets. They’re actually responding. They’re showing that there’s a reaction. They’re showing that they’ve had enough, and it’s making other people wake up and go:

 

“You know what? You’re right! This is enough. This has gone too far!”

 

And people are organising and people are radicalising and so on.

 

They’re radicalising not because of what happened in particular, because what happened in particular is that kind of thing has happened before many times in England, and it’s happened all over Europe. But there wasn’t the same reaction. And so it didn’t really move people enough.

 

But now that there’s a reaction, it actually inspires people to develop and cultivate a fighting spirit in themselves. And if enough White people start cultivating that fighting spirit, then all of a sudden we have a political movement that can actually do something.

 

So that’s the objective of that kind of activism, and our kind of approach, is we’re not going for mass appeal. We’re not trying to tone ourselves down and be maximally agreeable, because agreeable, toned down white people are getting nowhere! They’re getting run over! They’ve been getting run over for decades. What we need is White people that have had enough of the bullshit, and they’re not interested in putting on the suit and the tie and toning down our attitude to meet the sensibilities of middle class conservative types that don’t actually want to put anything on the line, that don’t want to risk anything. They just want to be able to vote for a party that solves the problem for them. That’s not how it’s going to work. How it’s going to work is thousands and thousands of men willing to go into the streets.

 

So that’s who we’re trying to appeal to. We’re trying to find that next 1,000 men that’ll come stand in the street with us.

 

And the only way that you can do that is by going and standing in the street and saying:

 

“Hey, come join us! Look, we’re ready!”

 

[35:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think increasing the frequency of the protests, as I said before, and also leaning heavily on that “right to peaceful protests” and obeying the law as much as you can, I think that’ll help you guys out a lot.

 

But you mentioned something earlier which I thought was interesting, even though you were standing there and Jacob was screaming “Australia for the Whiteman”, calling for mass deportations and so forth. Speaking of non-White races, you mentioned that non-White people passing by didn’t say anything. They didn’t really pay attention. They kind of just scurried away. And it got me, it got me thinking just now, is mass immigration and multiculturalism an exclusively White programme and policy?

 

And I think it is.

 

And while White governments kind of implement these policies and debate whether they’re good enough or whether they’re being moral or anti-racist enough, people who aren’t White, they just actually take advantage of those policies and then privately laugh about it.

 

So I think that’s why they don’t actually react when things like this happen, because they probably don’t feel that it’s their right to do so or that it’s in their interest to do so, or it’s just in their interest to take advantage of the policy and to kind of fly under the radar. I don’t know. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, there’s plenty of approaches that people can take. Like, as I have said before, anyone that wants to do anything that is vaguely supportive of White interests and White nationalism, like, as long as you’re not like raping kids or doing something additionally that’s completely egregious that I can’t cosign, i’ll support you! Because anyone doing anything is better than nothing!

 

And I believe in honouring people that put in work, trying to advance our cause and the race. So there’s lots of different approaches that can make sense for different strategic reasons, but the idea is someone has to go full balls out and go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to take the fight to the enemy!”

 

Obviously as legal, like within the legal framework. No overstepping the legal Mark outside of these grossly offensive behaviour, bullshit laws that they’re trying to use. But not overstepping any actual laws.

 

And then the idea with that is we’ll march right up to the limit of what’s possible and what’s acceptable. And that’s going to appeal very much to a fraction of the population that are people that are potential radicals, people that are likely to actually devote their life to, like, White nationalist activism. And then we’re going to try and recruit that 1% or recruit that 3% into the movement.

 

And then you can have a movement of people who are really, really radical that then can then really, like, push the boundary of what’s acceptable and inspire the rest of the population, stretch the Overton Window and so on. That’s the idea.

 

And then there’s a whole bunch of other groups that can kind of fill in behind that and occupy different strategic positions behind that. The idea that us doing what we’re doing is going to make people less racist or something. Like:

 

“Oh, there’s guys in Balaclava’s marching around, therefore, I don’t like racism anymore or something.”

 

It doesn’t really make any sense. I don’t think that’s how anyone thinks. The public response whenever I’ve done these things has actually been more positive than negative, which I actually found surprising. I was expecting it to be more negative than positive.

 

So I think a lot of average working class White Aussies, they kind of appreciate the ballsy style of the way that we go about things.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not what the mainstream media said, though. The mainstream media report was, well, they made it their business to broadcast in their report that passerbys and the public did not support you.

 

But because they went out of their way to put that in their broadcast to make that part of their quick little story about you guys the opposite might be true. You can see that there’s a strong effort by the what would you call the institutional class, the media class, to reinforce into the minds of their viewers that:

 

“People do not support this!”

 

They kind of try to tell people what’s popular and what’s not popular, what they should support and what they shouldn’t support. And they were very quick to hone in on a couple of people who allegedly said something negative to you guys when you were protesting.

 

But my question for you earlier was, why do you think, or you remarked that non-White people didn’t react to your protests? Why do you think that is?

 

Joel Davis: I think non-Whites don’t react, number one, because they’re intimidated. And I think a lot of them like a lot of the non-Whites in Melbourne are like Asians, Indians. I mean, these people are not known for being particularly confrontational.

 

So I think it’s partly because of that.

 

But yeah, I think it’s also because I don’t think they feel the same kind of moral indignation because I think a lot of them realise that they’re outsiders and they’re just kind of making hay while the sun shines and almost can’t believe how accepting and permissive White people are because no other reason.

 

[41:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like they themselves understand better how foreign to Australia they are, than kind of like White liberals or White people in Australia who are educated from a young age to see outsiders and foreigners as Australians as well. Everyone’s Australian. But the people who actually come from other countries into this country, even people who are born of families of immigrants, they still feel and understand that they’re not from here. They’re not native to the Australian nation as it was established by the British colonials. And I do see this phenomenon all the time. They themselves, foreigners, understand how foreign they are.

 

Yet White people who grow up in Australia are taught not to see them as different. And they actually fully believe that these people are equal to them. We are raised from a young age to believe that. And a lot of people do still thoroughly believe that’s the conditioning of human equality program.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think basically the White liberals that express their indignation as well, the thing is they have to morally differentiate themselves from their own Whiteness. They have to kind of come to terms with their own Whiteness as individual White people within our culture.

 

And so if they come to terms with their own Whiteness in the way that Leftists do, by pathologizing White Identity and kind of seeing Nazis as the most evil thing ever and so on, and develop this kind of out-group sensitivity, really a traitor mindset, frankly, then that’s going to become very important and integral to their identity.

 

Whereas if you’re just like some Asian immigrant, how you feel about Nazis actually isn’t really that important, because you don’t have to kind of contend with:

 

“Could I be a Nazi? Am I a racist?”

 

And have to go through some kind of cuckery within your own, like some kind of subconscious cuckery of your own, like racially charged thoughts or something:

 

“Oh, I had a racist thought. I’m so terrible. I must never allow myself to think that again or something!”

 

So it’s kind of like this thing with White people.

 

Blair Cottrell: I had an argument once in a taxi when I was younger. A couple of friends and I were getting a taxi home from a pub, and the Taxi Driver was Indian, and I was ranting to my friends because I had a couple of drinks. I don’t often drink, and I can handle my drinks. I don’t not drink because I can’t handle it. I just prefer not to drink. That’s why I don’t do it.

 

But when I do drink, I can get a little bit of that confidence kicks in. And I was trying to explain to my friends that people who weren’t White or descendant from the colonials, they weren’t actually Australians, and they themselves understood that they weren’t Australians, right? But my friends were arguing with me and saying:

 

“Nah, man. Like, as long as they obey our laws and live by our standards, and they’re Australians, too.”

 

But I used the taxi driver, the Indian character, driving the taxi, as an example, and I questioned him. I said:

 

 

 

“This guy himself.”

 

Let’s just say his name was Sadid or something. I said:

 

“Sadid, you’re not Australian, right? You’re from India, you’re not like me. We are different. You’re foreign to this country. Correct?”

 

And he says:

 

“Yes.”

 

I said:

 

“Right, so you’re Indian. You’re a different race to me. We’re not the same. Correct?”

 

He says:

 

“Correct.”

 

I said:

 

“So you would put your people first because that’s who you identify with. And I could be expected to do the same thing. Fair?”

 

And the Taxi Driver was like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

And I said to my friends:

 

“Well, there it is. Plain as day! Plain as the nose on your face, boys!”

 

And they still argued with me. They still said:

 

“Nah, nah, he’s just as Aussie as we are, man. He’s an Aussie as well.”

 

I said:

 

“He just said that he wasn’t!”

 

I said:

 

“He just openly told you that he’s foreign. He doesn’t consider himself Australian, and you’re still trying to argue that he’s Australian. He himself doesn’t even say that!”

 

I couldn’t believe that it’s like a core memory for me because it eally demonstrated the ignorance and the level of brainwashing of my own people in my own country. And it’s sometimes hard not to resent my own people, but I decide to regard them as victims of bad influence rather than being stupid or deliberately bad. And that gets me in the mood to spread some good influence and help people.

 

But, yeah, that’s, I thought that would be an interesting story to add to the equation.

 

Joel Davis: Well, on the leftist question, to me there’s two kinds of Leftists. There’s I think there’s what I would call “spiteful Leftists” or “bio Leftists”, where someone who is seriously biologically defective, whether it be mainly in their mental illness constitution, but generally it corresponds to physical weakness, physical ailments, sickness of the body of various kinds, being ugly, being small. If you feel like you, like, lesser than the average person, you feel like you basically got the short end of the genetic stick, then you’re going to be kind of quite resentful. You’re going to have this deep resentment towards White people who are actually healthy and noble. Resentful towards the standard racial hierarchy. And you’re going to be kind of turned off by any kind of ideology which celebrates hierarchy or celebrates certain virtues that are basically distributed to people better than you.

 

And so, you know how can you get revenge on all the chads and the Stacy’s? Obviously through this kind of egalitarian moral inversion.

 

And then you can then ally with out-groups against your own people as a way to then basically invert the status hierarchy. And you can dress it all up as you being a moral and superior person.

 

[47:30]

 

So I think for those people, I think those people, there’s no saving them. And they’re just basically like our biological enemies. They might as well be reclassified as of a different race because they’re such a defective part of our race that they’ve basically become differentiated into this totally distinct biological entity from us.

 

But then, and that’s, I think, a minority.

 

But then the majority of people with Leftist views are what I would call like “status seeking Leftists”.

 

And I think a lot of people are kind of conformist by nature. And just because the prevailing moral sensibilities of our time are Leftist, they basically think:

 

“Well, this is the values of all these institutions and determines the culture and the social status around me.”

 

And so they internalise those values and they don’t actually really think about it too deeply.

 

I think a lot of people, they just kind of internalise the values around them:

 

“Well, everyone else around me seems to believe this stuff, so it’s obviously true.”

 

And then anyone who challenges that, they then perceive as there’s something weird about this person. Why is this person thinking differently and violating all the moral norms that seem to be holding together the social space that I’m participating in and I have all these incentives to agree with so I just tell myself I agree with it internally because it’s just so much psychologically easier for me to just believe all of this stuff than to have to actually think about it because I don’t want to be cut off from society. This is all like subconscious thoughts that I’m describing.

 

So I think there’s a lot of people like that. Where if we had a society that was more Right-wing in its culture, they would all become more Right-wing as well, they would just conform to whatever the values of society were.

 

Whereas like what I called bio-Leftists or spiteful Leftists, I think they would still basically have Leftist proclivities even in a more Right-wing society.

 

So, yeah, I think the status seeking Leftists, I think we should have more compassion towards them. It’s not necessarily a bad thing that some people are conformist. If you have a society that has good leadership, it’s actually a good thing. It holds together society, makes it more stable. They are kind of the glue that holds together the social fabric and they just need better leadership. It’s not their fault that they have terrible leadership. They just don’t have much agency.

 

So whatever the leadership is, that’s what you’re going to get out of them. And it is what it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sounds like a supervillain, doesn’t it? Bio-Super-Saiyan Leftists. That’s what we’ve got to deal with these days, guys, bio-Leftists!

 

But did you want to segue into the story that you already mentioned, the story in England of little girls who I think were at a Taylor Swift themed dance party or something. They were set upon by a knife wielding African immigrant.

 

But I think he was a first generation or maybe second generation immigrants. I think he may have been born in England, but I’m not sure of all the details. What do you know, about that?

 

Joel Davis: So I believe the killer was a 17 year old of Rwandan descent and the media was like:

 

“Oh, he was born in Cardiff!”

 

Which is in Wales, and his family moved to, I think, Southport, I think is what it’s called, which is right near Liverpool in the northwest of England. Near the top of Wales on the Western coastline. Oh, when he was a six year old boy with his, with his family.

 

But you know, don’t neglect to mention that. And then like later it’s like:

 

“Oh, and his family were from Rwanda.”

 

Or something:

 

“But he’s British, you know! We’ve got these probably these Welsh baby killers out there we’ve got to watch out for!”

 

There was an image that I saw on Twitter of the guy, and he just looks like this, like, demonic. Like, he’s just black as fuck! And he had this, like, demonic expression on his face. They said he was 17. He looks like 35, horrifying, kind of dead look in his eyes!

 

So, yeah, anyway, so it was a Rwandan. I don’t think he would necessarily have probably have been a Muslim, because there was some speculation like, is this an Islamic, you know, terrorist attack? I mean, it’s possible. Most Rwandans, I don’t think, are Muslim. I think most of them are Christians or whatever weird variant of maybe they nominally Christian, but they have some, like, weird voodoo religion or something. But, it’s possible that he could have converted to Islam or that he’s from a minority of Islamic people that are Rwandans. I don’t know. But I think that’s beside the point.

 

I mean, the point is that he’s black! The point is that Rwandans shouldn’t fucking be in Britain! Or any Africans, for that matter! And that Africans are savage, and they’re way more predisposed to psychotic behaviour. And the media response was, rather than sympathizing with the victims, that we have these little girls stabbed to death for literally no reason.

 

Instead, the media focus is covering up the race of the murderer and then demonizing and attacking the protesters, who I think the reason why the riots initially broke out was they got together for a vigil. People of that community, they got together for a vigil for these girls that died.

 

And then a Islamic individual who wasn’t African, he looked like he was somewhere from the subcontinent in the images I saw, was arrested wearing a balaclava, holding a machete, by police. And when the people got wind of this, they reacted quite forcefully, saying:

 

“You know, so there was basically a Muslim coming to come and hack us for holding a vigil for dead children?”

 

And they lost it. Justifiably. And a bit of a riot ended up breaking out of sorts in the area, and protests and so on seem to be kind of erupting around the area now and maybe even in other parts of Britain from some of the things I’ve seen online.

 

So, which is good. It’s good to see a reaction, because when this thing happens, horrible things have happened where young people have been killed senselessly by hese racial aliens, these savages from Africa or the Middle East and there’s no reaction. They’ll have some big vigil in the middle of the city where they all sing Kumbaya and talk about how:

 

“We can’t blame this on race or something. We all have to come together!”

 

And that kind of bullshit! And that’s all that happens. It’s good to see a proper reaction. It’s good to see that the English people have a little bit of dignity left in them and righteous anger. Because righteous anger, bridging on what I said before, that’s the force that’s going to fucking save us! We’re not going to be saved by optics at the end of the day, we’re going to be saved by willpower!

 

So I think it’s actually quite good to see such a strong reaction, and long may it continue. I don’t think it’s over. I think there’s still a lot going on.

 

[55:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: That being said, I think the optics of your last demonstration were pretty good. Everyone being in black, everyone being pretty fit, everyone being in, I suppose, what you could say, an organised structure. Everyone knew where to stand, knew when to speak, knew what to do.

 

And I think it kind of looks cool that there’s only one guy with the mask off. At least it creates that perspective of uniformity.

 

So the aesthetics, which is what I regard optics as, the aesthetics were good. And it never hurts to have good aesthetics. You’ll notice people who protest on the left, whether they’re communists or Marxists, they always lack aesthetics because they’re not very healthy people. They look like shit!

 

And if you look like shit, it’s really hard to sell something to people because you’re like a physical example of what a philosophy is producing in a person, right?

 

So if your philosophy is good, you’re gonna look good. If you believe it well enough, and if you actually adhere to it. If your philosophy is bad, false, you’re gonna look like shit eventually, the longer you adhere to it. So a philosophy produces a physical expression relative to the quality of the philosophy itself.

 

And so I think for that reason, aesthetics will always be on our side, which is good.

 

Joel Davis: Aesthetics, I guess, like the word optics, it depends what you mean. Obviously you want to look good, you want to look cool.

 

But I guess what I meant to say is often optics is used as “don’t scare the hoes”. You know, don’t come across as too aggressive or too forceful. Tone it down. Make your message something that the majority of people would agree with. But the problem is that the majority of people are fucking pussies! And the majority of people have the wrong sensibilities.

 

So I don’t want to put a message forward that the majority of people would agree with, because that message isn’t good enough. I want to put forward a message that majority will don’t agree with, not yet. And they need to be challenged with. And, yeah, we’ve got to make it look cool.

 

So in that sense, you need good optics. You always got to look cool.

 

But it’s about showing strength. It’s about showing conviction.

 

And that’s what I love to see about what’s coming out of England at the moment is a lot of people disavowed the violence, so to speak. I’m not gonna do that. I could probably don’t want to say too much, but it’s good to see that these people just don’t give a fuck that they’re angry and that they’re expressing a true emotion. And we saw just in a week or two ago in, there was a massive riot in northern England. And I can’t remember which city it was. I think it was in Leeds. And some gypsy kid was, … Child Services came in to take a gypsy kid custody away from its parents. I don’t really know what the story was about, why they were trying to take custody off the gypsy parents. You know, maybe the gypsy parents were abusing the kid, I don’t know.

 

But then the gypsy community started rioting. And then a bunch of local Muslims just started joining in on the rioting as well, because why not? They just, like rioting. And the city descended into total anarchy. And the police basically had no control of the situation, and it lasted for days. And they had to just wait for them to stop rioting, and they got the kid back.

 

And so the message that that sent was like:

 

“Well, in England, like if you try to, like, peacefully and politically organise, you know, particularly as White people, you won’t get shit! But if you go and kick up a stink, then you can get something.”

 

So they basically said riot, and the police have shown weakness and a lack of capacity to restore order. Multiple instances in England. And the police have a reputation there for basically solving no crimes, being totally just weak and inept at protecting communities from violence, from all the rape and the gang violence and other forms of racially motivated hate crimes and so on.

 

But they’ll go knock on your door, if you make a racist tweet or something, Britain’s fucked! Particularly England, in the way that it’s policed. So no one should have any respect for the police in Britain because they don’t actually do their job. They don’t actually protect the people. They uphold an anti-White anarcho-tyranny.

 

And so White people ultimately are going to have to start organising to take care of their own fucking communities because the state is no longer actually functioning in a way that protects them. That’s what happens when you don’t protect people, when you invite in all these violent people where you give them soft sentences.

 

There’s been child rapists in Britain that have been sentenced to paltry sentences and, like, let out early and stuff because of their:

 

“Oh, they’re struggling with cultural assimilation or and where they come from, they don’t have laws against rape. How are they supposed to know they weren’t supposed to rape ten year olds or something!”

 

I mean, it’s insane the kinds of things that happens.

 

Meanwhile, they put Sam Melia in jail for two years for distributing stickers. They put other nationalist activists in jail for even longer sentences than that for handing out literature or giving speeches that were too edgy or something. Britain is unbelievably fucked! It’s way worse than Australia with this kind of thing. It’s quite bad here, as we were talking about earlier.

 

So this idea that the English people are supposed to just get your local representative elected and just peacefully organise, even though they tried to do that, they tried to build the nationalist party, the BNP. The intelligence services of Britain actively sabotaged and destroyed it. They had the National Action guys, various other nationalist groups that were prescribed, listed as terrorists, mass jailed. So many nationalist activists have had to flee the country or if they have, to avoid being locked up. The nationalist movement in Britain has been utterly attacked for decades by the State.

 

[1:01:05]

 

Anyone who tries to organise to defend, basically the idea that English girls shouldn’t be mass raped by Pakistanis or that they should have some modicum of justice for White victims of senseless and egregious acts of violence, in some cases murder, get called racist and marginalised from society and fired from their jobs. And so on. The list goes on.

 

So what the fuck are they supposed to do? All their other options have been exhausted.

 

So there’s absolutely no moral reason whatsoever that you can conjure up that’s good to justify not supporting almost anything that they do at this point, because their anger is totally justified. Their country is being fucking stolen from them, and they’re basically being forced to be subjected to third world conditions.

 

And basically the entire government is designed around preventing them from organising to protect themselves while completely unleashing an anarchy, a brutal anarchy of these foreign invaders engaging in all kinds of egregious behaviour against them! Like, it’s fucking insane! So godspeed to them.

 

I hope that the protests get bigger and get more aggressive and more and more people get in the streets, and I hope it swells up into a fucking mess that the government doesn’t know how to deal with over there. I really do, because that’s what’s necessary probably, to, like, force the issue and to force a polarisation.

 

And I’ve seen a lot of more conservative types on social media from Britain saying:

 

“You know what? I don’t give a fuck anymore! I’m a racist! There, I said it!”

 

And this kind of rhetoric, you know, it does seem like it’s a very polarizing time in Britain at the moment with recent events and good! About fucking time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I even saw Marcus Fallon, the Golden One, good friend of mine, posting about it saying that Sam Melia had a very reasonable, normal position and he was jailed for it. And until re-migration happens, White children will keep being murdered senselessly and unnecessarily. Probably true. I think the action that the government needs to be forced into taking is re-migration is sending these people back. And what’s it going to take for the government to actually get to that point? I don’t think they will do it. I think the government needs to be replaced in a fundamental way. Even the form of government needs to change, I think people know what I think. I don’t like the idea of democracy. The idea is fine, actually, but in practice, it ends up just being a seditious means. God, you can tell I’m tired. A seditious means for foreign control and, dare I say, a jewish influence to creep into your country and take over it from the inside.

 

And I suppose that’s why Netanyahu, at his recent speech to American Congress, hailed America as the “great citadel of democracy”. What that actually means is America is the “great citadel of jewish sympathizers” as a result of the jewish tentacles in all of the American institutions!

 

And I actually remarked about that specific speech on my Telegram because I was sickened by it! I couldn’t believe how Netanyahu was actually introduced by the Speaker of the House. Speaker of the House said:

 

“Ladies and gentlemen, I have the great honour of presenting to you his excellency Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel.”

 

And I’m thinking, his “fucking excellency”, he’s just a prime minister. He’s not Palpatine. And then before Netanyahu even said anything, there was this, like, sickening, drawn out applause that just would not stop! And it was reminiscent, eerily reminiscent of a Stalin speech, footage that I’ve seen of a Stalin speech, where Stalin is just enduring this painfully long applause, and he almost becomes frustrated with it. And he has to put his hand up to tell people to stop clapping.

 

[1:05:02]

 

And I think at the time, everyone in the crowd was probably too scared to be the first one to stop clapping because later in the day they could be shot. And that seemed to be the same kind of vibe that was in American Congress that day. Everyone was trying to be the one who cheered Netanyahu on the most. And every time he paused or finished his sentence, the American Congressman and Congresswomen, of which there’s far too many, they all took the opportunity to do another standing ovation and applaud the guy even more, even though he wasn’t really saying anything significant. It was all just very simplistic, us versus them propaganda like wartime dynamic of:

 

“We are the civilised ones and the enemy are barbarians! We are for life, the enemy is for death! We are the good guys, the enemy is the bad guy. Down with him. Let’s destroy him!”

 

And everyone was just clapping and, like, hysterically cheering this guy. And I’m thinking:

 

“This is weird! It’s like watching some alternative universe of absolute jewish worship. It’s the weirdest shit I’ve seen in a while.”

 

And that’s what I wrote almost word for word on Telegram after watching it. So what’s going on over there in America, guys? It looks like your entire Congress is just kissing Israeli boots. How did that happen? [chuckling] I knew that jewish influence was significant in the West and specifically in America, but I didn’t know it was that bad! That was really eye opening to see Netanyahu treated like a God Emperor by all of American Congress. Did you see that, Joel?

 

What are your thoughts about that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, it wasn’t all of American Congress, because I think about 100 Democrats refused to attend. And one Republican, Thomas Massey, who’s the only elected Republican in the Congress who doesn’t have an AIPAC guy, he said that himself. AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] is a like the number one institution that in American politics that advocates for Israeli interests and is a massive donor to political campaigns. And Thomas Massey was interviewed by Tucker Carlson recently and said:

 

“You know, every other Republican has an AIPAC guy. They all have an individual AIPAC guy who tells them, ‘well, this is kind of what Israel wants, is what the jews want, and this is what we wouldn’t be so happy with. And we’d love to help you out in your next campaign. So you keep your AIPAC guy happy, then we fund you. If you piss off your AIPAC guy, maybe we fund your opponent’.”

 

And that’s kind of how it works. And obviously, the jews have massive influence over the media. You go against the jews, you’re pissing off people that aren’t just people that you’re relying upon for campaign financing, but media coverage. They have institutional influence within the Republican Party.

 

So that is how they divide up many of the other forms of campaign financing and support and so on.

 

So in order to be a professional politician in the United States, you kind of have to suck jew dick! It’s almost impossible to function in American politics without doing. So very few people have managed to do it, but it’s quite rare. Thomas Massey is admirable because he is one of them, and he openly criticises Israeli influence, and it’s notable because he’s on the Right.

 

But obviously, there’s a lot more Leftist or Democrat politicians that are quite sympathetic to Palestine who are more like, socialist in their leanings and therefore are anti-zionist because they see zionism as a form of White supremacy or something.

 

Blair Cottrell: There was an effective method for engaging in politics without being subservient to either jewish or some other special interest group for funding. And that was to speak directly to the people and just use social media, which is what I was doing in 2015 and, 20016 before I was censored. But I suppose now aggressive censorship has made that a lot more difficult.

 

So it’s like maybe these, … But people in the political class rarely go for that angle anyway.

 

I mean, they believe in speaking in the upper echelons of the ivory towers and never getting their hands dirty by speaking directly to the public on the streets of America, Canada, Australia, whatever Western country we’re talking about.

 

And so that separation between working class and political class, I think, would need to be broken in order to effectively represent the people of a nation and become popular within the nation without having to be subservient to campaign funds and stuff like that, because they’re going to fund you, they’re going to keep throwing support and money your way as long as they know you’re there and they like what you’re saying. But I suppose having control over social media and also threatening people with legal action and anti-fascist action, anyone who dares speak in public, directly to the people, that’s what keeps these campaign funders and lobbyists in control of politics.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So the only way that the Australian Labor Party was able to operate back when it defended the White Australia Policy, or the only way in which the NSDAP [National Socialist German Workers’ Party-NationalSozialistische Deutsche ArbeiterPartei] was able to operate in Germany, was because they both had massive rank and file working class members who paid dues.

 

And so they were able to basically fund themselves on the backs of the people as opposed to having to go to elite donors.

 

Whereas in American politics, nothing like that exists.

 

If you look at the biggest campaign financing lists, it’s dominated by jews, as you would expect. Just look at who Trump’s biggest donors are in this current election cycle. There are all these jewish Zionists throwing hundreds of millions of dollars, at him, and this is customary in American politics. There was a study done I had posted about on Telegram, …

 

[1:10:47]

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, I was under the impression that Trump didn’t need money from anyone. Or does he?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s false. [chuckling] No, he’s raised hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, so he clearly needs it.

 

But anyway, there has been a study that has been done on opinion polls relative to whether a law passes or doesn’t pass the American Congress. And what was found that statistically, there’s absolutely zero relationship between how popular or unpopular a law is and its chances of passing.

 

But then if you look at the amount of campaign financing and lobbying, how many dollars are behind a particular law being passed, then you have almost like a perfect correlation between dollars into laws.

 

And so it shows that the American political system is an oligarchy that’s larping [Live Action Role Playing] as a democracy, because people get to vote, but your vote is conditioned by who has enough money to actually put together a campaign and who controls the media and so on. So it’s a vote within a very conditioned environment, conditioned by money.

 

The only way that which you could actually have the assertion of the popular Democratic will would be if the people got their money together independently of these elite groups. And you know, okay, no one of us can compete with these millionaires, but if a million of us chip in, then we can compete with the millionaires or whatever, right? That’s the principle. And that’s basically what I said, the NSDAP and the Australian Labor Party, when it was actually pro-White Australia, did. In the Australian Labor Party since it was through the unions, unions obviously basically funded by the workers.

 

So anyway, the point is that you can’t really compete unless you can compete financially. And that doesn’t exist in America.

 

And that’s another big reason why mass immigration is such a weapon against the political power of the people.

 

Because if you can basically create diversity within the people, you undermine their principles of kind of loyalty to one another and so on. And solidarity.

 

And so the ability to then organise the people into not just voters, getting someone to vote, it’s not that hard. I mean, it’s just tick a box. But to organise them into donors, into a membership that’s a completely different story.

 

But, yeah, like, yeah, America, the American political system, obviously it’s completely owned by jews. But I, the reason why I brought up that there was 100 Democrats that weren’t there was because they filled all the seats with just like random, I don’t know who, like actors. So they were probably all like clapping like seals the whole time, because they were just put there to clap for Netanyahu, like seals.

 

And so that increased the kind of sycophantic quality of it. It created this impression that all of Congress is all behind Netanyahu, but it’s because over 100 of them didn’t show up.

 

And in addition to that, I’m sure that there was a lot of eyes on all these Senators. And if anyone was seen to not be clapping hard enough, then maybe AIPAC, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely, definitely got that impression. But it seemed really contrived. Like if they were trying to make it seem like there’s a great deal of support in the room for Netanyahu, they went a step too far and it just seemed contrived. It was weird to watch. Creepy, even! That was the impression that I got as a fairly normal person. I consider myself a normal person. I don’t know what the audience thinks, but I think dabble in the realms of normal. And it was weird! It was like a weird alternative reality I was watching there.

 

But I’m not really that familiar with American politics, so I can’t comment much further. I just I just know that seeing how much influenced Netanyahu and the jewish community, Israel, has over America in that particular speech, … I don’t know if that is actually reflective of the influence or not. What do you think? Is the influence Israel has over American politicians that bad? Or is it not that bad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously they completely. I mean, it’s called ZOG for a reason! Zionist Occupied Government. I mean, obviously.

 

I mean, the Iraq war made no sense. It was not in America from the standpoint of American strategic interest. It was entirely conjured up for the benefit of Israel by, through Israeli infiltration of the American government.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s concerning too, because I’ve spent more than a decade studying the jewish people, their history and their nature. And they’ll use nukes, they’ll use gas, incendiary bombs. They don’t give a fuck! They think they’re the master race and everyone else is scum! They actually are raised to believe that’s what their religion teaches. And the speech that Netanyahu was giving was dehumanizing anyone who stands against Israel as barbarian terrorists who need to be destroyed. Essentially, that’s what he was saying. And these aren’t just empty words, the things that jews are capable of I won’t even get into. Its just a concerning trend! [chuckling] I’ll leave it at that.

 

I’m reading a book right now, though, a book I want to recommend to people.

 

I’m just going to segue into this subject quickly. It’s a book by a former soldier, social scientist, and I believe he’s providing or playing some sort of advisory role in America to American military and even social life for politics. His name is David Kilcullen. He wrote a book called The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learnt to Fight the West. And he coined this term, which I think is something we should spend a little bit more time trying to understand. We already understand it to some degree, but the way it’s described by Kilcullen is interesting. It’s “Liminal Warfare”. And according to David Kilcullen, the word “liminal” comes from the Latin term “threshold”. So you might call it a “threshold of warfare”. His term, “liminal warfare”, or a threat, a warfare that is below the threshold of what the West considers warfare. Because unfortunately, up until rather recently, and probably still for a lot of people in the West, we see that the concept of warfare, in too much of a black and white perspective, it’s understood that warfare means land, air and sea, military superiority or combat to some degree. Tanks, boats, guns, planes.

 

 

But obviously, warfare has many different expressions. Sometimes when you’re watching something on television and there’s messages in the programme that’s going to have an effect on the children in the room, that might make them a little bit confused as to what gender they are or confused about what was formerly understood as easy to understand, like their position in the family, whatever it may be, that can be a form of warfare. And we understand that as “psychological warfare”.

 

And I think liminal warfare is very similar to psychological warfare, but it’s got a couple of important differences which are explained by Kilcullen in his book, which I’m still reading now. So I’m still developing my understanding of it. I won’t embarrass myself by trying to explain something that I probably don’t fully understand yet.

 

But a couple of the examples he gives as to what separates liminal warfare from psychological warfare are non-Western states have been engaged in liminal warfare against the West for quite some time, and that’s how they’ve been gaining ground on a global scale. They know they can’t go up against the American military directly, especially after how the American military steamrolled over Saddam and humiliated his forces so quickly. And that was kind of a demonstration of American military power at the time.

 

Even China didn’t want to mess with America, still doesn’t want to mess with the American army. But there’s certain other aspects of warfare they’re constantly engaged in.

 

And he gives an example of Russia, but like the books written four or five years ago, so its kind of behind the times. Before Russia, quote, unquote, “invaded Ukraine”, they were kicking up a stinking Crimea at the time, I think the Russians.

 

And basically there’s a few stages of liminal warfare which I think are of interest to us and could even be better incorporated into some of our activism and politics. The first stage is you make aggressive action for a specific purpose, but at the same time, you have to kick up smoke and dust to confuse what you’re doing, to obfuscate the purpose of what you’re doing and make it look like something that it’s not.

 

So, for example, if you’re trying to host a protest for the purpose of purposes of agitation and recruitment, you need to make it look like that’s not what you’re doing, you’re actually just trying to protest peacefully and freely, as is your right as an Australian citizen. Stuff like that is kind of or would be a very small example of what resides within the realm of liminal warfare.

 

And you might say:

 

“Well, this is all very obvious.”

 

And some of it is obvious. Like I said, some of its very relative to psychological warfare. Like influence that’s designed to turn your youth against you, turn men against women, turn families against each other and atomize the community. And it is very similar to that. And someone in the comments is mentioning Yuri Bezmanov. I’m very familiar with Bezmanov. I’ve listened to his lecture a lot. When I was young, before I even got into politics, I used to play video games, and rather than listen to music, I would listen to Bezmanov’s lecture over and over again just to make sure the message really sunk in.

 

But like I said, liminal warfare, or that is warfare that’s below the threshold of what’s understood as warfare, is going to be important for us not only to understand, but to incorporate in the future, I think. Even just in the form of like, active protesting.

 

Another example he gave was getting in and out before anyone actually has the opportunity to flag you for any action. So you get in and out of an area before anyone even understands who was there or what they were really doing.

 

So that’s another way you can incorporate it. But I’ll go through it more once I’ve understood it better. I just wanted to throw it out there because the guy seems to be a really clear thinker, and it’s difficult to find people like that in the modern day with people like Drew Pavlou running around and all the other crazy cats trying to be influencers these days. There’s just so much convoluted information out there.

 

But this guy is for me, and this is saying something because I don’t read authors very often, and I don’t appreciate authors very often. David Kilcullin seems to be a pretty clear thinker, so I’d like to recommend his book for that reason.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I actually haven’t read that book. You were talking about it last night a little bit. It does sound quite interesting. But that concept of liminal warfare is already basically, I think, a principle that we’re already applying where the idea is let’s figure out basically the maximum amount of offensive that we can get away with without overstepping the line and getting thrown in prison, basically. And let’s try and apply pressure there, because one of the largest problems, and this builds into what I was saying before, is a kind of learnt helplessness.

 

A lot of people are so afraid, a lot of people are so afraid of associating with me or with you because they’re worried that the feds are going to start, look, be watching them or like:

 

“Oh, what could happen? I could lose my job!”

 

And a lot of people live in a perpetual state of fear. And they constantly like:

 

“Well, don’t do that. This bad thing could happen.”

 

And people are always warning me:

 

“Joel, this could happen. That could happen. Don’t do this, don’t do that, don’t do this!”

 

And they have this kind of paralysis because we do live in a society which is quite hostile. So I can understand why people would develop that mentality.

 

But ultimately you can’t allow that mentality to fester because that mentality will keep you from ever actually doing anything! At a certain point, you have to be wise. You have to also not go too far, and get yourself taken out. So that’s the idea of that liminal warfare concept, right, is to just find that kind of sweet spot.

 

And that’s what I try to do in everything that I do. The maximum amount of boundary pushing I can get away with without just overstepping the mark. And it’s difficult because sometimes you can overstep.

 

But yeah, I think that’s what’s necessary. I don’t like the overly cautious approach that other people take. It doesn’t, it makes me feel, it offends my kind of sensibilities. My sensibilities are I want to basically extract the maximum amount of ground as I can from the enemy with the way I live my life. Every single piece of ground I can take, I want to take it! And be constantly on the lookout to take more.

 

I also want to say, I was talking to a few friends in English nationalism.

 

And basically what they’re saying is that they’re organising, they’re organising protests all over the country, I think. And they’re looking to kind of build upon the anger right now to push further.

 

And I’m going to make a prediction. I think a lot of these protests are going to become violent. And I’m not going to disavow or vow, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Which protests exactly you’re referring to?

 

Joel Davis: There’ll be protests in England. There’s going to be, they’re getting organised at a grassroots level in these local communities, and nationalists are pushing them.

 

Blair Cottrell: But man, the hell, like, …

 

Joel Davis: I would advise anyone going to these things to put a face coverings, just like anything to protect yourself, you know, some of the boys in our organisation have hats that have like a hard, kind of a hard brim so that like, if you get a blow to the head, it can protect the head from damage because there was incidents wherever Antifa were throwing, like cans of tomatoes and stuff at people. You cop one of those in the head, you know, that’s not too nice.

 

So I would say protective gear. I would be advising people to protect your gear, protect your identity. It could turn pretty, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You need to really, you need to be careful of those five foot one British cops with their batons, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: They got dogs. They might use tear gas. I don’t know what they’re going to use. I don’t know exactly what is customary for British police to use in these kinds of situations.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see that footage? There was viral footage that went around of some, I think they were actually English police officers arresting a couple of what seemed to be Muslim characters at a train station, really dropping the knee into him. Did you see that footage? I don’t know what that was in relation to. I heard a girl, a female police officer was attacked, ….

 

And so the boys rolled in.

 

It actually got me thinking, maybe it’s not so bad to have one female cop in sort of like a little group or unit of cops, because then when she gets violently attacked by some of our, you know, alternative ethnic cousins, then it sort of throws the rest of the male police officers into an aggressive hysteria they otherwise wouldn’t be able to get into without seeing a member, a female member of their clan injured like that what I’m saying is the female police officer could be used as kind of like a sacrificial tool to anger all the male police officers and make them go even harder. That’s what seemed to happen at that train station situation. Did you see that footage, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: I didn’t see that footage. I saw another bit of footage where there was some dude arguing with the cop, and then a copy smacked him in the legs with his baton. And then some other guy came out from the crowd and started telling the cops off, saying:

 

“You know, what are you doing? That was such an unnecessary escalation.”

 

And then one of the cops set one of their attack dogs on him, and the dog just latched on and just bit him! And then someone came in to try and, like, get the dog off him, and the police attacked him for grabbing the police dog. So, I mean, it just seems like a total shit show!

 

Which is why I said, if you’re gonna go to any of these things, expect things to get hairy, expect things to get violent, and prepare yourself for that eventuality. It’s better to be prepared and not need to be prepared then to show up, you know, shorts and a T-shirt and you cop a brick to the head or something. So be safe out there!

 

But at the same time. There’s never been a better time, I think, to get in the streets then right now if you’re in England. So godspeed to all the patriots. And I saw some good images. I posted one on Twitter of this guy throwing a big Roman and all these guys up above the crowd. If, I don’t know if someone hoisted him up and all these guys throwing Romans around him in this crowd with like police surrounding them and so on, it does seem like the energy is the Vrul is rising in the Anglo Saxon! They are learning to hate!

 

So it’s a beautiful thing to see! It would be interesting to see how things unfold. If the energy dissipates or if momentum can somehow build.

 

[1:27:56]

 

 

And I think I just hope that nationalists project, you know, mass deportations or re-migration, if you prefer that term. I don’t like re-migration as much for this kind of thing because I think re-migration gives off the idea of like, “government programs to help immigrants resettle back in their homelands”, where “mass deportations” is just like, get them the fuck out! It’s more forceful. So I like that kind of rhetoric. But I understand if you’re trying to have a political party, re-migration is better to like present to voters as like a kind of sensible policy.

 

But I think for street activism, I think “mass deportations” goes harder, but it depends what you want to do. But that needs to be injected into this. That needs to be injected into the consciousness of the English people, that there is no solution to what is happening other than deportations.

 

Blair Cottrell: We can’t just hope for momentum to build. I mean, what does that mean? Err, let’s, maybe momentum will build. These people will just be angry. They’ll punch on with cops. Like, the state will just use increasingly aggressive measures, and then everyone will get sick of it and go home, because they remember that:

 

“Oh, shit! I’ve got a job, I’ve got a mortgage, I’ve got a car to pay off!”

 

And then it all just dies in the arse within a few days. So there needs to be like a concerted effort to organise a long term strategy out of incidents like this, rather than just like being like:

 

“Oh, well, let’s build momentum!”

 

Momentum doesn’t build on its own. It doesn’t build organically within the working class, within the peasantry, you might say. These people need consistent organisation! They need to be active members, and they need to be organised for long term political agitation.

 

And I suppose this is a good opportunity for some of the Right-wing groups in England to really get out there and make sure they’re absorbing as many people as possible who are hitting the streets and attending these protests. Absorb these people into your organisations and make use of them. Absorb them into active groups where they can then be put to long term use, rather than just letting this kind of fire burn down.

 

That’s what happens over and over again! In Australia, I’ve noticed there’s like an aggressive response from the people against some government program, whether it’s immigration policy or lockdowns, vaccine mandates.

 

But it’s not really capitalised on by any organisation. And that’s not really to throw dirt on anyone. I was probably in a position, for example, where I could have capitalised on the anti-lockdown protests and really contributed to them in a big way, or even helped absorb people from those protests into more long term political strategies. But I was being harassed by the police at the time. Several times before some of those lockdown protests, the police called me and said:

 

“If you’re at the protest, if you’re seen there, we’ve been instructed to arrest you on site. Just letting you know.”

 

So there was a strong effort made by the government to actually prevent any long term organisation or capitalisation of these events by anyone who had the willpower or had the capacity for understanding to actually do it. And I think that’s probably happening in England, too.

 

But there’s got to be ways around that, and there’s got to be risk, sort of necessary risk to take. I just don’t want to see this die down. I want to see as many people as possible going to work and absorbing as many people as possible into active organisations, nationalizing people, not necessarily keeping the fire alive, because the fire is naturally going to simmer down on its own, because people have lives to go back to. And that needs to be taken into consideration I think.

 

I mean, it’s easy to just throw fuel on a fire that’s burning in the moment, but you have to understand that fire is eventually going to burn low. And when it does, what you’re left with is the resource that you’ve actually gained at the end of the day.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point to make. I think there’s a lot to be said, though, for the English people showing a response, just showing an angry response rather than a cucked response, as what has basically unfolded over other recent tragedies. Because that means the next time this happens, as a precedent of:

 

“What we do in response to this, is we get angry! And we get angrier and angrier each time!”

 

As opposed to sit on our hands and talk about how:

 

“We’re all one people and no race is to blame for this, don’t look back in anger.”

 

That kind of shit!

 

So I think that’s why I do like to see the fuel on the fire in this instance, because there just needs to be a little bit of balls being grown and a reassertion of some masculine energy!

 

But yeah, I 100% agree with what you’re saying. And my understanding, I don’t want to name any names, but talking to people I know in England, I haven’t actually spoken to Mark Collett about this, so this doesn’t apply to him, by the way. I’m not saying it’s, but I’m sure I would almost guarantee that there’s got to be some kind of involvement in this kind of thing from Patriotic Alternative people because, you know, they’re like a big faction in the nationalist movement.

 

[1:32:57]

 

But yeah, my understanding is that basically all the nationalist organisations are super active and doing their best to co-ordinate things and to network and to recruit and everything.

 

So that’s obviously a really good thing to see. I think one problem maybe that they’re having is that there’s a lot of support in the public for the anti-Islam, Tommy Robinson [aka, Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon] type approach. And getting people to look at things racially rather than just in terms of anti-Islam is also another task for the nationalists to ideologically redirect things into a White nationalist direction.

 

So, I mean, I’m not in England. I only see what people are saying online. People are telling me online, but there seemed to be a lot of energy over there. So it’s a good thing to see. Because it seems a bit similar to what happened in Ireland. Like, in Ireland, you had a few big, high profile immigrants killing natives in brutal and egregious ways, and then you had these big riotous responses from the Irish people, and people said:

 

“Oh, well, what’s the point of that?”

 

But it did show a bit of fighting spirit, and it seems as though that’s actually translated somewhat into a little bit of organisation. And I’ve seen lots of stuff coming out of Ireland all the time where they’re successfully resisting refugee settlements. You know, how they try and, like, take, like, a hotel in a particular town and pack it full of immigrants and that kind of thing, or take public housing and pack it full of immigrants.

 

They’ve got quite good, it seems, in Ireland, at protesting against that and preventing that they do that in England as well. I remember particularly talking to Joe Marsh about pretty successful protests they had somewhere in Wales where they just basically camped out in front of this hotel and just prevented it from being filled with immigrants. And they won. It was successful.

 

So, you know, translating into those kinds of like regular actions where it isn’t just throwing a few bricks at cop cars and everyone goes home, but then it becomes something also productive.

 

But yeah, and I also saw that the Reform Party has been quite disappointing. I think Richard Tice, who is like the 2IC [Second in Charge] of the Reform Party, he was running it until Farage stepped back in just before the last election. He came out and condemned the violence and so on, which I thought was quite disappointing because, you know, Left-wing politicians don’t condemn the violence. We saw this in, we saw this in America and most particularly when Black Lives Matter were rioting and all the Democrats were like:

 

“Well the police are racist and we can understand these communities and their struggles and so on.”

 

You know, that’s the kind of rhetoric that you would expect from so-called Right-wing populists. They should be coming out and saying:

 

“Well obviously, you know, everyone should stay peaceful, but at the same time look at what has happened there you got to understand what these communities are going through and take their side, sympathize with them, rather than taking the side of the Leftist and the system against them.”

 

So that was, I thought, quite disappointing, but also to be expected.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is there anything else we want to touch on in relation to news, local news, international news? What else we got?

 

Joel Davis: Um, maybe there’s a funny thing we could touch on which is, you saw Friendly Geordie’s video on Drew Pavlou, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I did. Nipples protruding.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it was quite funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d never thought I’d watch a Friendly Geordie’s video and find it thoroughly entertaining. I usually find the guy kind of annoying.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s just got that Left leaning nature that just irritates me. But he’s actually been posting some based shit lately and it was genuine. Like, I watched it with my girlfriend and it was like we genuinely laughed about it.

 

So, yeah, Friendly Geordie. I don’t know what’s happening, man. I don’t know what kind of universe I’m living in, but Friendly Geordie’s is actually kind of enjoyable content at the moment.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The video where he went, … The Israel lobby a month or two ago and it was pretty good.

 

And apparently his live shows are actually more based than his YouTube channel. Apparently, at his live shows, he’s actually steps over the line with racial remarks and anti-semitic remarks.

 

Now, I don’t think that Friendly Geordie’s is our guy. He’s very much a Leftist, and he’s a Labor Party shill, and his missus is Asian.

 

So, you know, any podcast with there’s that brown dude on his podcast. So he’s clearly not a White nationalist. But at the same time, he’s a man of a lot of influence. And it does seem as though he’s kind of occupying that kind of Joe Rogan kind of style of politics, where you kind of mix elements of the Right and the Left together. Like, you take some Left-wing social, economic policies, I should say, and you mix it with a kind of anti-woke, conservative, like, social attitude.

 

And that’s quite interesting, because usually those things aren’t coupled together. Well, that actually seems to appeal to the sensibilities of a lot of Australians. Because a lot of Australians are kind of soft core National Socialists. They like nationalism, patriotism, mixed with a Left-wing economic slant. That’s kind of what this White working class in this country have always been like, but just obviously a lot more radical than Friendly Geordie’s on issues of race.

 

But, yeah, I thought it was quite funny because in his taking the piss out of Drew Pavlou video, which I was surprised that he just made a whole video taking the piss out of Drew Pavlou, he kind of imitated his accent, and he put on this, like, really, like, exaggerated wog accent.

 

[1:38:52]

 

And then he kind of insinuated that he looks Middle Eastern and played a clip of Drew Pavlou speaking and put Al Qaeda style video overdub on it. And it was quite funny. So he kind of was basically racist. Like, he was mocking Drew Pavlou for not being White, basically, which I thought was funny.

 

And then he basically just called him gay and fat. Like, that was the video. It was pretty good. [chuckling] It was just basic insults! But it’s excellent! You know, that’s the kind of thing that we get under Drew’s skin. And the video was titled, I think, “Lolcow” or something. And it’s probably the perfect way to describe what Drew Pavlou is. He is basically just a lolcow*.

 

[* Lolcow, a portmanteau (A word formed by merging the sounds and meanings of two different words, as chortle, from chuckle and snort) of the acronym LOL and cow, is a derogatory slang term used to describe an individual who is deemed highly exploitable and therefore susceptible to trolling and flaming due to their display of gullible behaviour online. The term is also closely associated with the forum Kiwi Farms, which helped to popularise it throughout the 2010s and, 20020s.]

 

So yeah, I think I like this idea of Drew Pavlou just being this whipping boy of all of Australian politics. Like, I see even like the far-Left, like, Antifa types. Like, they shit on Drew Pavlou.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tell me, Joel, tell me, do you, do you think he’s genuinely being serious or is he trolling for me? It’s hard to tell if he is trolling. He’s doing a really good job acting like he’s being serious. Like, is this guy, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s a mixture of the two. He is seriously narcissistically deluded, but then also he just trolls for attention and the two things are quite mixed together. So it becomes this kind of convoluted mess of like, is he trolling right now or is he being serious? And he’s kind of masked all of his mental illness in this elaborate facade of bullshit! And it’s just quite hilarious to watch! Like, he actually, it actually is entertaining that he exists. So I’ll give him credit for that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Agreed. I’ve actually been checking whatever he’s doing, it’s working for the purposes of getting himself into the field of vision of anyone who’s anyone in Australian politics at least, because even I’m checking his ex-account just for cringe value lately, and just to kind of laugh at the comments. But I’m still clicking his account and that’s the point, right? I’m still traffic that’s now going through his account.

 

So maybe that’s the genius of Drew Pavlou. Maybe he’s just a content genius! I don’t know, [chuckling] but it’s hard for me to understand whether he’s for real or not, but whether he is, whether he isn’t, he’s definitely an entertaining character, and he’s managing to get. Didn’t you get the attention of Andrew Tate? Andrew Tate threatened to sue him or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what he tries to do. He tries to get the attention of lots of people. That’s his whole modus operandi because he doesn’t actually have anything in himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a very standard method for people who aren’t really significant, intelligent or special in any way and don’t really have much to offer. Their way of becoming significant is to just get people who are bigger and more impressive or established than them to attack them. And that, as a result, raises them up to a similar level as the people who are attacking them, at least publicly. It’s a very standard method people who aren’t talented use to try to get on the similar level of talented people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But I like that he attacks us and me, because every time I talk, I interact with him on Twitter. I just ratio him and make him look like a like an idiot! And it just makes me look good by comparison.

 

So it’s just like low hanging fruit. Like, I might as well just go pick some Apples from the Drew Pavlou tree, like, every now and then, because it’s free Apples. Why not?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. What else?

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, if you guys haven’t seen it, you can find the link on my Telegram, if you don’t use an iPhone.

 

And also download, if you have an Android phone, download Telegram directly from the Telegram website, not from the Google Play store. So that you can see now my channel, which has been A.

 

Banned, but also Tom Sewell’s channel and a few other channels that are A.

 

Banned. It’s really not that hard to download it straight from a Telegram website. Takes just a few seconds.

 

Sorry to the I-cucked [iPhone], though. It’s not an option for you, as far as I know, but I will make. I will make a new Telegram channel. I said that earlier, and I’m reiterating that, but for now, that’s what it is. But maybe we’ll go through a few Superchats. There’s actually one from Entropy, from The Gump. He sent $14.88. And he said:

 

“When will Joel Holder learn how to ban to workshop for Swedes?”

 

It’s quite funny!

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s that in reference to?

 

Joel Davis: I think I talked about how I didn’t think Scandinavians, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah. Because Swedish people apparently don’t understand sarcasm. That’s what you told me.

 

Joel Davis: I didn’t say they don’t understand sarcasm. I said the way that we use it, they don’t really use it. Like, they don’t really appreciate it. I think they understand it, but they don’t appreciate it. Like, they just have a different appreciation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, but anyway, banter isn’t just sarcasm. Banters complex. A complex thing, I think. Yeah. Only really, like, Anglo-Celtic people are true masters of the bance.

 

And then, you know, every other ethnic group, you know, is kind of trailing behind us in the art of banter, …

 

[1:44:20]

 

Blair Cottrell: I think banter is like some fundamental tool that you need in order to be a good comedian. I wonder how many Swedish comedians there are. I can’t think of any. And there’s plenty of comedians that come out of England and Ireland. I don’t know about northern Europe, though. They might be a little bit too serious. Maybe it’s true? I’ve never been to northern Europe, so I don’t know. Haven’t got personal experience. But what could be the essence? How would you describe banter? What is banter? Is it, I don’t know, teasing each other, picking on each other, but in a way that’s not aggressive or hostile, but just playful.

 

Joel Davis: The idea of banter is that you basically tease each other and then you see if the other person can just tease you back but maintain a lighthearted, jovial attitude, or if it actually starts to impact them and they start to feel personally affronted, and if they start getting offended and start defending themselves and lashing out and so on, and you can see that they have a weak mentality. Whereas if they just kind of fire it back but maintain a kind of detached, jovial aura that shows that they have a kind of mental stability. And that proves that you can kind of trust them to maintain mental stability in general!

 

And so it’s a way for men, in particular testability of all their other friends to see, like, is this guy a fucking bitch? Is he going to snap under pressure? Is he going to get, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a male shit tests! It’s a male shit test.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s why people who can’t take banter get bullied, because they deserve to get bullied. If you’re going to be so emotionally fragile that you’re going to take banter to heart, well, then you make yourself a target of bullying, don’t you? Right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But I’m not saying, anyway, I don’t want to shit on Swedes. I can see the Swedes in the chat getting upset. I’m not, … I love Swedes! I was just responding to a Superchat. And I was just, … I think our banter is superior. It doesn’t mean I think all Swedes are like, retards. I don’t understand humour or anything like that you know, just, again, this is an example of learn to banter. You don’t have to take it so seriously.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m starting to see that arrogance could be the crux of the issue. One of the most prominent Swedes and a regular supporter of the chat said that:

 

“Actually, our humour is just more advanced than yours.”

 

Okay, [chuckling] that explains it! [chuckling] We’re just not smart enough to keep up with the superior master race Swedish humour!

 

Joel Davis: To be fair, you have to be really high IQ to understand Swedish humour or something. It’s like Rick and Morty.

 

Anyway, the whole, … [chuckling] No, but it’s an Anglo-Celtic thing. Like, this is how we are. Don’t be so anti-Anglo. Like, let us be ourselves. You know, it’s part of our our identity.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think anyone’s being anti-Anglo. I think this in itself, what we’re doing right now is banter to a degree.

 

We got another Superchat. $14 donation from Alt Cuperian. You know, consistent supporter of the channel. I’ve seen this name pop up a few times, so thank you very much, GM from US:

 

“What’s your thoughts on starting a non-profit for the purpose of White advocacy?”

 

I suppose he means not for profit organisation:

 

“Is that a waste of time? Is the only meaningful way to organise the active club strategy. So should we start?”

 

I don’t know. Personally, I think you should try whatever you think might work. I think maybe this has been tried and maybe it hasn’t in certain places. I’ve always felt in my core that setting up a religious type institution protected by freedom of religion law, specifically in Australia, that was actually more of an ethno-religious community. I really think that’s something that should be explored further. People agree with me, but then nothing is ever done about it.

 

So I might have to do that myself one day. I don’t know. But you won’t know until you try. That’s the point.

 

And I’m not against someone setting up a not for profit, you know, White advocacy organisation. You might go up against some sort of discriminatory accusations and you might find yourself in court, blah, blah, blah. But there’s precedents where other ethnic community organisations that are not for profit exists. And you could probably leverage the fact they exist to support or justify your own existence as a White advocacy group.

 

So I’m not against it. I don’t think it’s a waste of time. I think things like that, they all sort of contribute to putting pressure, not necessarily putting pressure on, but gaining ground against the system, which is fundamentally anti-White, which regards White people as devils, descendants of colonials who have to pay for perceived historical injustices. And we need to gain ground against that system in a thousand different ways, and in as many different ways as possible.

 

So definitely not against the idea.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it would be a good thing to have a not for profit. I think the main functions that are necessary are things that can actually protect pro-White activists, like some kind of organisation that could network small businesses in order to provide jobs for pro-White activists, something that would be really good to set up. So that if you put yourself on the line to advocate for our people, that there’s actually like a pro-White economy, if you will, that can scoop you up and make it so that it’s still possible to pay your rent and put food on the table for your family and so on, to make it more viable to be a pro-White activist or other kinds of initiatives like that.

 

So I think that kind of thing is quite good. And certain things kind of like that already exist, but they are limited in their functionality.

 

So, yeah, obviously we should have basically every single idea anyone has ever had about:

 

“Should we have this or should we have that?”

 

My answer to it is basically:

 

“Yes! We should just have all of it!”

 

That’s what a successful political movement has, lots of different organisations, lots of different initiatives. There isn’t just one organisation that we need. You can’t completely transform society with one organisation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, good answer. Tend to agree. Basically echoes what I said, I think.

 

And $5 from White Power, regular supporter and contributor. Thanks, mate. He said:

 

“Republic for Australia. I did a poll for it a while back and it was around 50-50. 50 for people with our views.”

 

Well, I don’t know, Joel, this is a question for you. I don’t even really understand what a Republic in Australia would mean.

 

Joel Davis: It would mean getting rid of the Monarchy.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, like that hasn’t happened already. I mean, look how much power the Monarchy has in Australia! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. I think the I think that’s a good retort. That is something that’s not really worth focusing on. The issue is that getting rid of, … I’m not in principle, like:

 

“Oh, we have to hold onto the Monarchy.”

Because, as you say, it’s basically dead anyway. But the Monarchy is an institution that represents our heritage. It connects us to Britain, to the rest of our people, ethnically speaking.

 

And so that’s why the Left attack it. They attack it as a form of trying to attack our heritage, to attack the foundation of our nation, our identity.

 

And so I defend it upon that principle.

 

And I also whenever the Left, because the Left is the one that are pushing for a Republic, when they push for constitutional reforms, it isn’t just remove the Monarchy and leave everything else the same. What they did in the 1999 referendum was proposing a completely different kind of constitution.

 

If they put forward another constitution now, like, imagine if they’re not going to do it. I don’t think it’s on the cards for the immediate future, but, like, let’s say the Albanese government puts forward a Republic referendum. Imagine how cucked the Constitution that they would put forward would be. It would have all this, like, pro-abo shit in it and pro-multiculturalism and pro-gay stuff, and it would be horrible!

 

So they would package deal it with all of this other crap that we wouldn’t want in the Constitution.

 

If you had a Right-wing, like, a far-Right Republic, then I would be maybe interested, because maybe that the Constitution they’ll be putting forward would actually be better than the one that we currently have.

 

And so it’d be worth moving to a Republic, and it wouldn’t be done in an antagonistic way towards our identity, which is how the Left would attack the Monarchy. But they would just say:

 

“Well, the Monarchy no longer serves us, and it didn’t defend us, and we needed it to defend us, so we might as well do away with it.”

 

Then maybe I would listen. So it really depends.

 

But, you know what is likely in the current political system to come forward as any kind of Republican push would just be trash.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think that’s why they’d want it. Just to kind of wipe the slate clean legally and make their own laws, do away with constitutional laws and rewrite it, maybe. I don’t know. But I tend to feel the Monarchy is just a cooler concept.

 

You know, maybe we could just re-establish a monarchy down here and create our own monarchy, name a new King. That’d be cool. I wish we could do something like that. I like the idea of power being more centralised, individualised, even of a single figure that’s actually responsible and can be held to account! Rather than this kind of like, majority rule grey area where no one’s even really sure who has power, and no one’s really responsible for anything because it’s the institution that’s at fault, not any individual.

 

I think that’s gay. I think that’s pathetic! I’m sick of it, actually! I’ve only ever lived in a system like that, and I’m just thoroughly repulsed by it. Repulsed enough to really support anything that concentrates power into an individual, single party, or a person, wholeheartedly. That’s what I want now. I’m sick of this majority ruled democracy bullshit, to be honest. But that’s the system.

 

Joel Davis: I would much prefer an absolute monarchy, with no Parliament. If we could restore the Stuart monarchy in Australia or something, and they were based and racist and so on. I like monarchy as a principle. I think monarchy actually is probably the most ideal form of government if it’s, like, an actual functional monarchy with power, but we’re just so far away from that. Like, our true Royal Family was basically betrayed and taken out, like, centuries ago.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s start a new one!

 

Joel Davis: The ones in place, are totally cucked and have no actual power.

 

Blair Cottrell: What made our true Royal Family the true Royal Family in the first place? Probably just brute force!

 

So let’s just start a new Royal Family. Maybe circumstances get dire enough for us to do that in the future. Might be able to take advantage of some sort of chaotic situation. If, like, there’s some sort of global reset and everything falls to shit for a while, maybe we’ll get the opportunity to re-establish a monarchy. That’ll be pretty cool!

 

[1:55:51]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think that would be great, but, I think a dictatorship is something that’s more likely than a monarchy.

 

So I would say we’d probably be working towards that [chuckling] first and foremost and any kind of likely progression.

 

But, yeah, I mean, functionally, obviously, democracy is retarded! It’s not real, but it’s an illusion that facilitates the rule of nefarious elements. So I have no loyalty to it whatsoever in principle. But that should be quite obvious. I mean you’re watching a show that is, it’s not like some centrist, like, conservative show.

 

Anyway, so there’s a few Superchats on Odysee. There’s one from GoyBoy 1488. He said:

 

“This has become one of my favourite shows despite being American. Thanks for the good work, lads.”

 

I appreciate that. Filled Soda said:

 

“Thanks for your content. I’m here in Belfast, Northern Ireland.”

 

He didn’t say Northern Ireland. He said:

 

“Northern Potato, Niggerland. And I’m incredibly angry at recent events. The murder of three little girls, at the sickening Leftist reaction. I recently found your show, but I’m happy to find a stream that doesn’t pull any punches. 1488.”

 

I appreciate the support, and yeah, obviously what happened was fucking disgusting! Uh, it makes my blood boil! To me, I feel such a strong connection to Britain that when things happen in Britain, it feels like it feels like it’s happening to my country.

 

Blair Cottrell: I feel the same. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

I mean, that’s my ancestral homeland. Ninja 404 said:

 

“Good morning from Cucknada. Thanks for the stream. It’s the first one I’ve caught in full. Keep up the good work.”

 

Yeah. Shout out to our Canadian friends. I think the Diagolon guys who we’ve collaborated with before, Ferryman, being kind of their main kind of streamer organiser, and Jeremy Mackenzie, they’re doing, like, a tour at the moment through Canada. It seems like they have a lot of fun and putting on interesting events. So it isn’t as though there’s no one doing anything in Canadian politics. So Canadians kind of sell themselves short. But there’s plenty of Canadians in the movement. I’ve seen a lot of Canadians in the White nationalist movement online over the years. There seems to be quite a substantial amount of our guys up there, so no need to be so self depreciating.

 

Confederate Patriots said:

 

“How about them Brits in Southport? Whites all over are waking up and pushing back. Thanks for all you do. Dixie is ready!”

 

Yeah, based! I am a big supporter of the Confederacy, because obviously, the Confederacy was run by a Davis, my clan, and what else is there to say?

 

Yeah, I 100% agree that it’s good to see the English pushing back. It is interesting, as well, that they’re pushing back in Liverpool or near Liverpool, first of all, because Liverpool actually has a lot of Irish blood, a lot of Irish immigrants, historically. So there does seem to be a little bit of a correlation [chuckling] between Irish blood and rioting. You know, Australia has a lot of Irish blood here and maybe that gives us a little bit of an edge. Uh, maybe sometimes you need a little bit of that angry Gael to whip things up!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man. Well, my mother is half Irish. Her maiden name was McGaughren. I’m not sure how it’s spelled. I think it was McGaughran. And her mother’s maiden name was Bradshaw. So she’s half Anglo, half Irish. And my dad’s got, like, a Norman name, like Cottrell. My last name comes from old Frankish Norman tribes. During the Norman conquest of England, it started to appear.

 

But my dad is cool, calm, practical. Like, you just never really get a reaction out of him. Like, very pragmatic, very German. And my mom is, my mother’s anger is like, I don’t want to throw dirt on my mother. I love my mother. And she was very maternal. She was a great mother. But, man, her anger, you’ve never seen anything like it. The fighting spirit of my mother, it’s frightening, man! My mother, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s where you get your ginger beard from, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. Well, I get my Irish from my mother’s side, and often I often seem to be a bit of a, you know, combination of my mother and father in that regard. I have the ability to be pragmatic and to consider logistics, but then I also have this, like, difficult to understand, difficult to explain fire in my belly that I’ve inherited from my mother. But I’m kind of glad that I’ve got my father’s influence, because my mother can really lose her mind!

 

Like, my mother’s rage is just off the charts! And I don’t know if it comes from her Irish ancestry, but, yeah, the Irish definitely have that fire in their bellies, and I love to see it. I can resonate with it! Like, when I hear the Irish speak, when I see the Irish move, like, I feel connected to that. I understand it, you know what I mean? You know, when you see your own kin, it’s hard to explain, but I definitely feel a strong connection to the Irish, but also to the kind of German-Anglo elements as well, because I have that in my ancestry, too.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, obviously, I’m the same in my ancestry. I mean, it’s mostly English, but there’s some ancestors from all over the isles. And obviously, there’s the Anglo Saxon migrations and the Celtic migrations before that, and the Norman migrations from the rest of Europe. So, obviously, we’re all northwest Europeans were all very racially similar. We’re one big family, and English is a Germanic language, you know, for a reason. We worship the same gods as the Germans and the Scandinavians for a reason.

 

So, yeah, there’s a no, obviously, the Celts had a bit of a different religion, so there’s a little bit of a distinction there, but yeah, very racially similar. Very similar in temperament with only kind of slight ethnic differences. So I do feel a strong connection to basically all those northwest European countries in particular.

 

But yeah, I think that might be all the Superchats for this evening.

 

[2:02:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been a good show. We had about 500 peak viewers on Rumble, which is pretty standard viewership. Really appreciate you guys for tuning in and staying with us.

 

We’ll be back next week.

 

Joel Davis: 90 something on Odysee, and, yeah, some on Cozy as well.

 

So, yeah, usually we get it all across the three platforms, 600 and something peak viewers on an average show.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel and I going to a national weightlifting event soon, but that won’t interrupt our streaming schedule. We should still be able to stream next Thursday. And yeah, really excited to get into it next week. I hope you guys have a nice week and we’ll see you again next time.

 

Is there anything else you want to drop on the audience before we tune out? Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No, just thanks for watching White power and, yeah, I guess I’ll probably make a new Telegram over the next few days, so keep an eye out for that. Also this weekend I was going to do a stream with Thomas 777. I haven’t done anything with him for a while, so I was keen to catch up, get his thoughts on., … He’s an American White nationalist kind of Internet personality. He’s very well read, he’s been around a long time. He’s got a lot of wisdom.

 

So I always like streaming with him so that go up on all the chans, I think Australian time on Saturday. I think it might be Friday night American time. But I’ll just confirm that. I’ll put it out on social media. I’ll give you guys warning. And yeah, I want to do something with Jacob as well at some point in the next few days, so just keep an eye out. There’ll be a few streams going up between now the next Thursday night show. I will be on the road next Thursday night, but I think I’ll be able to set up and we’ll still be able to do the show as normal.

 

So yeah, but just watch out for social media and I’ll try and get a new Telegram set up for those of you that are Apple iCucks that now can’t access [chuckling] my Telegram channel because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that me? I’m running the Apple. So I’m going to have to use alternative means to see your channel.

 

But before we go, I’m going to be dropping some new content out this weekend. Just training content. I might vlog a gym session, do some legs, show you guys what I do, just have a bit of banter and have a bit of fun with that. Like I said, I’ve taken a break from content recently. I haven’t really made much, but I’m going to get back into it. Work starting to slow down again, so I’ll have a bit more time and I’ll get a bit more fun stuff out there for us to engage with. But yeah, thanks for joining us, guys. I’ll see you next time.

 

[2:05:05]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/2/2024 = 432 )

@Alison-Chains
53 minutes ago
Id join you guys and march in the streets if i was in Australia.
i tried linking up with the NJEHA since they’re near my state.

1
0
VotingDoesntWork
1 hour ago(edited)
Russia DID invade Ukraine and is conducting a genocidal war targetting civilians as well, what’s so “quote on quote” about that mr. Blair?
1:18:45

1
1

@SammichLubber
2 hours ago
o/

1
0
Indo-European
3 hours ago
it may be hard to judge but the appearance of the protesters and the harshness of the message seem counter-productive. This sort of hardline NS rhetoric is a total turnoff for all but the initiiated and coming from masked men in black fatigues it seems to me to be playing into the enemy’s hands. Best wishes to all the brave men who are prepared to demonstrate and I hope that I’m wrong.

0
1
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
48 minutes ago
screw the optics! we’re at war and innocent children are being killed by these niggers. white people have every right to be angry and taking to the streets. so far nothing else has worked. third world people only understand violence. the politicians don’t give a shit either so it’s time to send a message.

1
0

@Mr.Fox
4 hours ago
i dont like hersants voice. makes me cringe. bring back sewell.

1
2
Hide replies

@Moonman
1 hour ago
I think he’s done a great job. Very inspirational and persuasive.

1
0

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
\\\

1
0

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
Blood & Honour, Sieg Heil! o/

2
0
TheLastBoyScout
7 hours ago
how old is Blair

Hide replies
Lampshade Denier
5 hours ago
33-34

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Everything Electron sucks real hard.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Odysee’s desktop app is an Electron app (based on Chromium) and therefore it’s slow as hell sometimes.

1
0
Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Okay. Maybe I will take a look at it. But I still guarantee you that they will get in trouble eventually because of some new censorship law or whatever.

@Moonman
9 hours ago
o/

2
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Gonna be frost in VIC overnight, cover your veggies

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
It’s also why they are shifting away from cdn77.com and moving over to arweave

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
o/

Smokey
9 hours ago
Later, boys!

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
nothing is stored on ldry………and i know this because im fiends with the top lbry guy…….

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Oh yeah they did that for legal reasons

1
0
Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Hail Australia!

1
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@bodvar_biarkey
I need to sort it

1
0
StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
lol

@filled_soda
9 hours ago
Looking forward to the stream with Thomas

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
god i hate arguing with you… but again are you wrong… when odysee bought out lbry they took over the content storage…

@bodvar_biarkey
9 hours ago
Dawnie come to Rumble chat

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
ahh gotcha

@CampsLindburgh
9 hours ago
o/

@bodvar_biarkey
9 hours ago
Heil!

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
JoelBlairLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Thanks for the stream

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
WP O/

@sparkofspirit
9 hours ago
thanks guys o/

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
o/

@CampsLindburgh
9 hours ago
WP

Walther Mauser
9 hours ago
Thanks for the show \o

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
WP

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Moonman
It was the original storage front for video content, odysee was the user friendly front end they made for it

DOLO
9 hours ago
Cheers chaps o/

@WhiteStrike
9 hours ago
thanks for the stream lads o/

@Ninja404
9 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah, check the blockchain explorer, it should let you search for vids and files

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
If it really is an actual free speech platform, then I’m pretty sure that they will get in trouble eventually. I guarantee you.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@tropicanaNFT
I think that they got a lot of Irish, Scottish and French.

tropic
9 hours ago
canadians are very irish

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I’m unfamiliar with lbry. lbry.com?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
lol david

@david_smith
9 hours ago
I think I had that feeling when I had some of the Irish spirit

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
It’s Irish.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah it’s starting to make sense now. Blair has said that Australia contacted Facebook to ban him from Facebook.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
vaughn live, the owner literally played the new zealnders greatest streamers video when it was shunned by ever other platform…….

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
Italians too. The anger is unreal. Tempered by my Nordic stoicism

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
No they are currently using cdn77.com for their VOD services (check your network TCP’s right now as you watch the stream) they are switching away from this to the arweave platform.

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
I suspect they were both Canadian

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
A few regions far away from Southport UK kicked off.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah this is what I suspected. They’re doing a bit of ‘house cleaning.’

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
I have my doubts.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
nah cat man you are wrong… it was bought out by another platform and they are switching away from lbry who were the “free speech” side of things

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago
GTV maybe the only option for our content creators at this point

Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
12 minutes ago
i can’t access gtv from my phone. its an android galaxy. i tried going in through the brave browser and still nothing

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
aerweave is a bit of a funny one.

@5PY_HUN73R
has had a play with the source code and already setup a website that uses it.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Can you really criticize Christianity on there? Or promote National socialism for example?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
\\\

1
0
Bo Sinn
9 hours ago
I attended the terror tour o///

Enlightened Despot
9 hours ago
We’re here, just no political outlet. There is no political party right of far left

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
o/ confederate

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
vaughn live is the other one

Smokey
9 hours ago
Dissident was Canadian, right? Was Freddy Canadian, too?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
o/

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
joshwho and fuck… i forget the other one… are truly free speech… which is why they dont get money or get advertised…..

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Smokey
Probably Canadian government tap them on the shoulder for that ban

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
This is the announcement of the new ownership I’m aware of
https://x.com/OdyseeTeam/status/1780019630100320311

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Yeah, that would not surprise me. They get the ADL / SPLC telling them to take certain channels down.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
A so called Free Speech platform will never really exist, because the current system simply won’t allow it. That’s just how it is.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Aha aha. I thought that I heard that there were new owners. At any rate, something is going on with the deletion of channels, etc.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
I think the SPLC is on their ass
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023/11/06/digital-threat-report-odysee

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
odysee themselves announced it

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
not only did odysee change ownership… but they are divorcing themselves from lbry and going to some other jew platform

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Ah, I thought that they had new owners with the new changes.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah like bitchite draw us in to build up the platform and then kick us off.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
odysee was always the enemy sadly…

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
Odysee did not change ownership
https://x.com/OdyseeTeam/status/1780019630100320311

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Moonman
you can probably stil find freddy on lbry….which is why odysee is removing its self from lbry……..

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Moonman

@TheRebbeOfficial
Dissident and Freddy were good channels. Sad to see them gone. I was just getting into their stuff, too. Odysee changed ownership recently and is going through some changes.

3
0
Hide replies

@EverybodywakeUp
6 hours ago
I noticed Freddy had gone, his channel was great I’m sure he was from the Uk.

3
0
Show reply
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
A New Nobilty

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
you still might be able to extract freddys stuff off of the lbry site before they take it down

@Moonman

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah it happens, streams are long format a lot is always missed, people set it on and are doing something while it going, sometime even going to sleep. I did that to Maldric today.

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
a republic if you can keep it (spoiler we didn’t)

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago

@Moonman
Yeah, I’ve just been doing the same, with the same result. FFS

Enlightened Despot
9 hours ago
LOLcow was pretty good

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
kek, we are everywhere o/

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
I had a pretty good look across a few other platforms, it appears Freddy was only on odysee

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
i totally miss loads of what you say in your streams lol

Confederate patriot
9 hours ago
$5.00
how bout them Brits in Southport! Whites all over are waking up and pushing back. Thanks for all yall do. Dixie is ready!

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
tbh anything after sundown here im only 1/2 listening to…. otherwise it fucks my sleep patterns

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago

@Moonman
I hope to god they haven’t broke his resolve and he bounces back. I can imagine it been very disheartening after the amount of effort he obv put in

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
interesting re GV

jbabybakes
9 hours ago
the hardest part of non profits is getting a dissolution clause that the bureaucrats like. you can just copy another org’s though

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
Absolutely. I’ve been racking my brain trying to find some stuff again.

@WhiteStrike
9 hours ago
CI is just like that, but retards can’t get past their tiny brains beyond “hur dur we wuz jewz”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago
NZ has one already and the state and media fucks with them all the time. Gloriavale.
https://gloriavale.org.nz/

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Agree with the auto religious. 100%

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@Moonman
I’m gutted. I loved both of their content. Freddy was a fucking gold mine for content

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I’ve always been a big fan of British humor. I love irony.

StrongerTogether
10 hours ago
NGH non governmental Hitlerism

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
$5.00
Good morning from cucknada, thanks for the stream, its the first one i have caught in full. Keep up the good work! o/ o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
I don’t think trying anything that is pro white is a waste of time.

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
I’m really unimpressed about Freddy and dissidents content disappearing. it needs to be back up somewhere.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Be quick off the mark….or die

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@DOLO
:rofl:

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
But you’re still correct to a certain degree. You really are.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
Yeah, if i was training for the banter olympics i would just employ some ghetto blacks to talk shit to me all day to build resolve lol

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@DOLO
In England “Banter” is absolutely ruthless. You find you mates weak point and take the piss relentlessly

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Most of our comedians here in Sweden are politically correct and extremely boring. There are some good ones, but they’re only on the internet.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
Yeah what Joel said

DOLO
10 hours ago
The ability to laugh at yourself is how i would describe banter

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
Banter is a sensitivity test. It lets you know if you can trust and rely on a person in difficult times.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i spell banter with a rope and a truck

@Moonman
10 hours ago
I’ve got big chunks of my favourites missing

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@Moonman
Fuck. Nooooooooo

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
You had probably gone to bed when I showed that

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
fascist Freddy is also gone. He had great audiobooks and ebooks.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
wut, freedy was banned too?

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
fark, that’s why my odysee notifs are low. I thought it was an upgrayed

Smokey
10 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah would not surprise me.

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
From what I’ve heard the Canadian government went after him again and demanded he be removed from odyssee.

DOLO
10 hours ago
Also a guy called Nietzsche’s pupil that did mainly philosophy, but he was pro Hitler/NS

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
nordic resistance, facist freddy and jeremy mackenzie, all gone on odysee this week. some people say you can still get the content out of the blockchain on lbry’s site

@david_smith
10 hours ago
“The empty turkroach reverberates loudly” Sun Tsu

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah, a few channels I’ve been watching are suddenly gone…

Hide replies

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
Nordic Frontier getting banned was a big loss.

Smokey
10 hours ago
I’ve noticed Odysee has banned a few channels this week

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
FascistFreddy is gone too

DOLO
10 hours ago
Fascist Freddy was banned as well

Smokey
10 hours ago
Any word on why he was banned?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago

@Smokey
about 48 hours ago plus or minus

Smokey
10 hours ago
Odysee seems to be getting strict.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
For attention not fun? Weird.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@Moonman
Why did he get banned? I just checked, and his channel is gone.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
I haven’t seen the Jord : Pavlova vid. Link anyone?

DOLO
10 hours ago
lol

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i loved joels “debate” with the turk roach, i was sold after that

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
That is Thor

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
based, the more you know.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i only know joel

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Yes

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
\\\

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
is that blair catrell?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Blair you should go on his stream if he has one

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
jajaja Jordies calling out Israel lately

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
me too, moon man, im kkkangry

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Tice is disappointing. Farage is just as abysmal.

DOLO
10 hours ago
Very

DOLO
10 hours ago

@david_smith
Vey Aryan thing to do.

@Moonman
10 hours ago
I’m spewing about dissident being deleted

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no no, raging dissident, of diagolon fame

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago
(caps sorry)

@david_smith
10 hours ago
They stopped when they thought innocent dogs may get hurt by the bricks

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago
i’M FROM THE uk AND YOU’RE 100% CORRECT

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
who was the guy asking about optics before? i mean i like rage… despite how much he cucks…. but this is where cucking gets you..

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Quartering got nuked? I actually dislike that guy.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no body has covered it that i have seen

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i hope jeremy is okay, after his channel got nuked.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
Good. It’s worth having a look at, but he is verbose. A long book, very detailed.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
I did, thank you. I think i’ve read some of his work, the name is familiar.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
– Did you see the name of the book I gave you on JFK?

DOLO
10 hours ago
Just make sure the Transport Police are not present because they are usually armed.

DOLO
10 hours ago
One*

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Who of the only benefits of being a disarmed nation is that for a while at least you can go toe to toe with the cops.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DOLO
There’s still transmissions not decoded today ‘The M4 Project is an effort to break 3 original Enigma messages with the help of distributed computing. The signals were intercepted in the North Atlantic in 1942 and are believed to be unbroken.
http://www.enigmaathome.net/

@david_smith
10 hours ago
The virus vax thing is a complex issue, like I mentioned earlier in chat it is a wedge issue, both the vax and virus were probably weapons. Then they send propaganda to make people fight for being on one incorrect side vs another.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
we’re still simmering

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
zog*

@Ninja404
10 hours ago

@Smokey
the gov are big fags down there, fuck the x

Smokey
10 hours ago
I suspect that it is going to be very dangerous being a police officer in the near future in countries like Ireland and England.

Smokey
10 hours ago
wow that’s crazy. telling you that you will be arrested for showing up in a public place?

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
They’ll never break the code!

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
we did it… reddit!!111!!oneone!!!!eleven!!!

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
o7 o/

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
lol

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
A little elongated but it’s still good ^

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
dawn shamed again….

@Ninja404
came through tho

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
awesome gents!

@Moonman
10 hours ago
R

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Rrrrrrrrr

DOLO
10 hours ago
E

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
G

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
G

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
G

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
I

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
N

@GrandPaLampshade
10 hours ago
Covid was a gift ( it shows you the police , politicians , Unions , Religous groups , welfare groups etc are spinless maggots that will turn on you )

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
can we get an N tower for joel?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
They should get Rand on, I’m sure he’ll have something insightful to reiterate from “the boyz”

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
“it is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener in a war” – Sun Zu Davis

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
there is a reason my first comment on any stream is “hello lads”…………

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
o/ patriots!

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
lol woman or the dog as bait?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
X’D

@david_smith
10 hours ago
We need Tom on the show to stop chat talking shit through the show

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
LOOL you dont even know who new zealands best streamer even is…. was callaghan even around in 2019?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
:rofl:

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
LOL

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
thanks, Dan.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
ok thank will check it out. feel free to post/chat on my community page if you have anything you think i might be interested in

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Your are only saying that because callaghan got on joe rogan

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
only culligan is better than CCG, ya know know cause he sniffed his sisters pussy.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Back again. Blinking son #2 always wanting a chat

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
cat man is literally new zealands 2nd best streamer… there is no shaming him…

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Have fun. Sounds like a pleasant weekend

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i have a full box of clays and a full ammo can of target shot

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
dan, found it here:

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
I don’t see the problem really

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Cheers.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
Final Judgement: The Missing Link in The JFK Assassination.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no game, probably just some shotgunning and chilling in the forest

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
I heard it, was busy not watching, just listening

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
What’s the book called? I like Piper.

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
has left chat?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
lol CCG shamed

@david_smith
10 hours ago
What game?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
Camping

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
– He’s a French writer, his book is dedicated to Michael Collins Piper. I do not think it is mainstream.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
just confirmed im going csmping this weekend!!

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
i dont watch anything main stream, so no i have no idea.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I recently watched that documentary on the JFK and RFK assassinations by that French writer. Do you know the one I mean? It was pretty interesting.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
black pilled did a good stream on it i think

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
nor the jew rubenstein who killed oswald did it to “protect jews”

Smokey
10 hours ago
5th Dimensional Warfare.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
about the jfk thing… what you wont read about is his praise of hitler…… or the fact the jew zapruder who filmed it didnt even flinch when the gun went off behind him and the bullet went literally over his head

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
The Zapruder film didnt flinch when jfk was killed live on tv in a killing of the king ritual

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@jbabybakes
Yeah that is crazy

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I’m reading Michael Collins Piper’s book right now on the JFK assassination. So I know what they’re capable of. But I’m speaking more about the details surrounding the Trump shooting. A lot of questions there.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
37 assassinations to get a jew elected in mexico

@david_smith
10 hours ago
They will use viruses and vaccines, make it a wedge issue and make people think viruses are not real

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
in 2016 with the election of trump literally everything since has been obvious, they were obviously going to censor the internet which they did, they were obviously going to do everything they could to stop us which is why they released the coof….

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
they treat earth like a private minecraft server

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
There’s no Antisemitism without Semitism. Simple as.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
yes its that bad

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
its not that strange if you have been following politics for at least the last decade, in fact its to be expected

Smokey
10 hours ago
Netanyahu even told them, “No! Don’t clap! Listen!” aha. The Boss is speaking.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
whites need to control the root of all evil. create a shadow dollar & stfu about it until you have enough power to replace the dollar

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah. I saw that. but a lot of questions….very strange.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
oh he was definitely shot. there is a clear screen shot showing the bullet that hit him…. but this is a very complicated issue… its maybe going to spiral the left into starting the civil war… but its also going to put the normies to sleep

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
100%

Smokey
10 hours ago
I just saw a new clip today of the shooter running around on the roof, and Secret Service and police never noticed that? 150 meters away? Does not pass the bullshit smell test.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
all it cost was selling his daughter to the kushner family

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
It’s not a white mindset, that’s for sure.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
his father was a massive developer in israel

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Do you think Trump was really shot, or is it gay ops?

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
trump was personally saved from bankruptcy by rothschilds loans

Smokey
10 hours ago
trump’s ear seems to be healing nicely. No mark at all.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
while the 109 thing is the meme… the actual number of times they were kicked out was over 1030 times……… i have the short list on my channel…

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Amazing mindset when you think about it.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
imagine banning 109 people from chat and the cube

Smokey
10 hours ago
yeah. imagine getting kicked out of 109 pubs and blaming the bar staff. :joy: :joy:

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
break more toasters ffs…. i need more content….

Smokey
10 hours ago
Jews are the largest donors to both the Democrats and Republicans. Yet they are only around 2% of the population.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
109 countries, but NEVER their fault. Funny how that works.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Miriam Adelson pledged $100 Million to get Trump elected.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
o/ IDK yet maybe monday

@david_smith
10 hours ago
good luck trying to red pill the chat

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
1913 the jews were given america, 1917 america gave jews the middle east….. its nothing new

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Bingo.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
More

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I know.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
congress kisses jew ass because they’re in mossad’s blackmail economy

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
*odd

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Balanced ratio of lies per minute vs standing ovation by minute

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
thats nothing new. its been happening for the last 100 off years…. look into uss liberty

Smokey
10 hours ago
Blair, it’s bad. Real bad.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Netanyahu is literally a war criminal and they give him 58 standing ovations.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
The future for white children. o/

Smokey
10 hours ago
that Netanyahu speech was crazy – 58 standing ovations? so crazy.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
yeah, that’s probably true, the trick is to unify into a cohesive or coordinated group.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
That’s exactly why they kept clapping lol

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
sup cat man. whens the next stream?

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
its why the uk gov are gulagging people who arent even breaking laws…..

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
the beautiful red hair jews line had me lol

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
we were past 3% in the meme war of 2015/16… we are FAR above that now which is why all the censorship

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
purpose of democracy is to conceal oligarchy

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
The state is ruled by the enemy

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Sam’s judge let off pedo’s before sentencing Sam for stickering…

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
thanks. 3% is not many. but we’re not there yet.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
this is why i particularly like tom, i dont agree 100% with him but i 100% agree with what he is doing… join an active group

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Is Dalton allowed on?

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I’m glad that they are rioting on the streets and showing that there is a limit. It proves that there’s still hope.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
that is why they are trying to shut us down so hard

Smokey
10 hours ago
Kevin MacDonald is another example of god optics. Literally a professor and academic, yet he is banned on on social media.

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
it’s like the protest in London last night, they arrested random people. And gave them a caution to not attend future protests

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
it only matters what you do, not how you look… i think the stat is that you only need 15% with an unshakable believe but you only need 3% to get onto the streets to make a revolution

@Aus1788
10 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
will never know but the English youth is one of the cuckd demographics I’m Europe

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
that’s happening everywhere, in the US recently a nigger got 180 days for raping 4 and 9 year olds while a dude just got 20 years for clear self defense

DOLO
10 hours ago
NA got 8 years some of them.

Smokey
10 hours ago
2 years prison for putting up stickers.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
its now kick sfo cause hes a faggot

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
LOL KICK VEE

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
I heard a kid had been thrown out of a window, that’s why CPS was involved

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yes. When you talk about ‘jews’ and ‘race,’ it does not matter whether you are wearing a suit and tie or a swastika on your T-shirt – they will still hate you. There is now ‘optical’ way to talk about these things.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago

@Aus1788
You never know.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Kick Vee

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
good optics grow our numbers, bad optics makes us look like fools n loons – unlearnable for some, sadly

@david_smith
10 hours ago
LPVO FTW

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah, i’ve seen so many 35yr old looking black ‘teens’

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
yeah, compromising for the sake of NPC’s gets us nowhere

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
Scare all hoes, last one standing gets a ring

@Aus1788
10 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
likely murder two self hating whites.. But still a loss

Smokey
10 hours ago
Jared Taylor has great ‘optics’ – he’s banned from all social media platforms.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
optics have never mattered.. they will slur us no matter if we are anywhere right of chairman mao…

Smokey
10 hours ago
Aesthetics are powerful, I agree.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
He murdered 2 of OURS. Parental & familial heartbreak aside, think of how much progeny we have lost.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah, but the Left have shitty optics and are in power.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago

@Smokey
How much money goes into advertising & marketing?

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Trump likes bad optics

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
the very fact that they have to come out and say we can’t blame race just demonstrates that it’s a racial problem

Smokey
10 hours ago
Do optics really matter?

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Such a horror show.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
apparently it was born in the UK to nigger parents so the age thing is likely accurate. its only the first gen invaders who claim to be “kids” so they get an easier path to illegal occupancy

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Jews kill thousands of children all the time, just a small sample of what is coming.

warren-g
10 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
remember all of it…teach it to future generations

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
Don’t get sad, get angry, then get even

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I saw the images of those little girls. It almost made me cry.

DOLO
10 hours ago
They probably are lying about his age so they don’t have to reveal any details.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Race first. Always.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
jajaja he was totally 17… …as am i…

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
I don’t believe for 1 second that he’s 17

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah

Smokey
10 hours ago
They said he was 17, but he looks about 35.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
He was nigletted as achild

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Absolutely.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
oh a youth

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
makes a lot of sense. easy to be a sparky that also learns hvac than the other way around

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
“17” who looked 40…

DOLO
10 hours ago
Born in Cardiff

@Moonman
10 hours ago
They’re different from us, not in a good way and they have to leave now. Whatever shitty beliefs they hold is just another layer of incapability on top of the core problem.

DOLO
11 hours ago
I used to go with the air con lads to wire it up for them, i had about a 30 min job and got paid as much as they did.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
“Racism” = Survival instinct

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@jbabybakes
Choose the one that you more attracted to

DOLO
11 hours ago

@jbabybakes
You can choose to do air con as an electrician.

@david_smith
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I have sated earlier I care more about genetics, I simply want to know if there is info on a simple question

jbabybakes
11 hours ago
what trade is better, electrician or HVAC?

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Aus1788
o/

@Aus1788
11 hours ago
Blessings to my European Aryan brothers and sisters 0/ be well of good mind and body

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
It doesn’t matter. Rwanda has a horrid recent history. Let’s not have them in our homes.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@david_smith
it dosnt matter if he holds one of the jewish religions,… he was a shitskin invader

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Dans has lots of alcohol

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
its a religious myth just like the holocaust

@david_smith
11 hours ago
I was just trying to find out if anyone knows if the thing was a muslim or not, there are conflicting claims.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
so dumb

Smokey
11 hours ago
Because they are totally demoralized.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
“it’s all jewish”

Smokey
11 hours ago
Yuri Bezmenov said that you can show normies facts, data, etc. and they still will not change their thinking.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
no scholar who wrote about such things ever wrote about the things claimed in the jesus story at the time, the (((eye witnesses))) who claimed he existed were born some 20 to 400 years after the story was invented…

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
Precisely. None of the 3rd world should be anywhere around us in the 1st place.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
Jews don’t follow the Torah

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
i know the first books of christianity are the same books of the jewish torah which existed before

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
“I know history, Jesus was invented”

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Nobody hates all non-whites as individuals. Most of us perfectly understand the difference between general group pattern and individuals. But they still all need to leave. The west is ours.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
nah dont like him at all… but i know history……….

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
ah so you’re an Adam Greenberg fan

@david_smith
11 hours ago
My point is is if they were not a muslim, then subversives like Tommy have no argument. I have no idea if they were muslim.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
what was the religion called before the story of jesus was invented?

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
A judeo-Christian isn’t a Christian either

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@david_smith
its a whole lot more difficult to understand that simply “which flavour of the jewish religion is he”. there are massive swaths of “white” judeo-christians who are far worse than say assad the muslim leader of syria.

@Moonman
11 hours ago
When nons feel the pressure they’ll leave.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
No real Christian is stabbing little girls…

@Ninja404
11 hours ago
^^^

@david_smith
11 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
For example misdirecting it as a purely religious issue eg. Tommy Robinson who is antiWhite and just misdirects to a subsection of muslims

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
What if he was raised Christian? Rwanda is predominantly Christian.

Smokey
11 hours ago
I saw a lot of White women on Twitter attacking those brave White men protesting and fighting with police in England.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
If everything was hopeless the censorship would be unnecessary.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
It does, I’m more genetics based in thinking. The truth is important for various reasons.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
His religion doesn’t matter.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Was it even a muslim?

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Rwandan. Southport.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
We’re still comfortable, even in the slow decline.

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
“When will there be justice in Athens? There will be justice in Athens when those who are not injured are as outraged as those who are.” ~ Thucydides

@Moonman
11 hours ago
it was fantastic

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
lol my boomer mums on board. COVID woke her up.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
I don’t hear about all these other protests.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@Moonman
and that is a glorious thing, when the normie began to hate

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@danzimmons
It’s the beginning of the end. Their abuse of power is beginning to rub even the normies the wrong way.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@BoSinn
Thanks

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
no, the Dick Pusey incident

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@whiterabbit
4 re Southport?

danzimmons
11 hours ago
yeah lol

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@danzimmons
Re Blair vs Tommeh: In size, not in fundamentals

danzimmons
11 hours ago
the systems going after the protester’s like they slaughtered innocent children

@whiterabbit
11 hours ago
4 died

danzimmons
11 hours ago
lol Blair equal’s three tommehs

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
it’s just abuse of power, pure n simple

DOLO
11 hours ago
Dick Pussy lol

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago
why does Blair look like Tommy Robinson right now?

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
We can’t get burners anymore

@DOLO

danzimmons
11 hours ago
fucking zogbots man take a knee fagget’s

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Community driven distros only. Corporate Linux sucks.

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
Linux is da whey

@Moonman
11 hours ago
Jacob’s a champ. Showed the clip to a coworker today, after working with him for a while he’s now sympathetic to the cause.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@DOLO
yea its part of the digital ID shit

DOLO
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I can see that happening globally, or at least in the west.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Goolag.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Crapple and Microshaft.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
you gotta give ID to get a number here now

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@DOLO
dont think you can get “burners” down here in aus any more,even in the 90’s the only way was to get prepaid sims from a servo but im pretty sure they ended that long ago now

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Moonman
o/

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@DOLO
good idea, cheers

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
Friendly Jordies made a funny vid abt Drew Pavlu lel

@TASMANIANDEVIL
11 hours ago
Based superchat

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
All big tech companies are onboard with the anti-white globalist agenda.

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Moonman
You could always get a burner sim card just for sign-ups

@GoyBoy1488
11 hours ago
$14.88
this has become one of my favorite shows, despite being american. Thanks for the good work lads

@Moonman
11 hours ago
I’m banned from telegram and not a big fan of it requiring a number.

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago
make a private channel where you forward posts from, seems to work

@filled_soda
11 hours ago
$5.00
Thanks for your content. I’m here in Belfast, Northern Potato Nigger Land and I’m incredibly angry at recent events (the murder of three little girls and the sickening leftist reaction). I recently found your show, but I’m happy to find a stream that doesn’t pull any punches. 14/88!

@Moonman
11 hours ago
o/ hey fellas

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
o/

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
hello lads

danzimmons
11 hours ago
°///

@katana17
12 hours ago
Grandma Waffen image:
https://katana17.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Grandma-Waffen-SS-Anime-20240724.jpg

@katana17
12 hours ago
Here’s one for Tom: [Thomas Sewell – Messiah or Caeser – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript]

Thomas Sewell – Messiah or Caeser – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript

@katana17
12 hours ago
Here’s last week’s transcript: [Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript

0
0

==========================

See Also

top