============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/5/2026 = )

2 Comments

leibekohne
2 days ago
https://www.noticer.news/joel-davis-released-bail-telegram-post/ Joel is free after 133 days, this zog cowardly act must never be repeated, zog should pay huge compensation, and be replaced. Viva; White international unity p….

GreenGladeAryan
4 days ago
Bloody legend this bloke
0
1

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Thomas Sewell: Alrighty, we’re live. Max volume, everything. Audio input, capture.

 

All right, testing, 1, 2, 3. Use my big boy voice. Volume’s low. What’s your problem? I actually found a setting. Everyone’s like, Tom, fix your settings. We’re going 150%. There we go. Alrighty. Alrighty. Testing, testing!

 

All right, obligatory, free Joel Davis! Free Brandon [Koschel]! Free Jim Roberts!

 

So I’m going to cover a few subjects today, as you expect, with a solo stream. I really enjoyed my most recent stream with James Mason. It was like a five hour don’t Fed post challenge hard. He Fed posted a couple times, but as you’d expect. But I reviewed it and it wouldn’t breach. It wouldn’t breach even the most ridiculous laws we have here in Australia.

 

Now, one thing that I need to correct from the stream is I think I said that the book Siege is in a grey area of the law. My lawyer has told me that it is potentially banned. So he was like, it’s kind of in a dark grey area of the law. It’s not 100% banned. There is a banned list of books in Australia and Siege isn’t on it. But I cannot encourage anyone to go and buy that book because they haven’t made the case yet.

 

But what he suggests is that they’re trying to make the case. So I’d be very careful with that book in Australia. That’s one thing I want to clarify. Yeah, I think Mason gave a pretty sound explanation of what his intention of the book is. And I’m surprised that there hasn’t been any negative press because I know the journalists will watch a stream like that and get their AI ready to write an article for them about how evil we all are. But, yeah, that hasn’t happened.

 

But I do want to give people caution here in Australia that, yeah, I’m not encouraging you on legal grounds. I’m not encouraging you to read the book.

 

And I think all I said in the stream was that I did read it back in 2019 after being bullied by Jacob Hersant into reading it. I originally didn’t read it because I thought it was what everyone says it is. And I was like:

 

“I’m not really interested in that. I know enough about X, Y and Z through reading army manuals when I was in the army, so I don’t feel the need to read something of that nature.”

 

And then Jacob was like:

 

“No, it’s. That’s not what it’s about at all! There’s like some contentious lines in it. But overall, that’s not what it says.”

 

And Mason clarified that on stream. And I do appreciate him doing that because I think siege culture and accelerationist culture is really misunderstood. You know, accelerationism as a concept is, and siege as a concept is really misunderstood. And you’ll notice when I said to Mason about how our strategy has been to do the maximal amount of work with the minimal amount of damage, you’ll notice he was nodding the most. Mason’s not advocating for anyone to be an idiot and go to jail. He’s actually advocating the opposite. He’s saying:

 

“Do as much as you can to the integrity of the system without ruining your life!”

 

And he is proof that he’s done 60 years in the struggle. 60 years of inspiring people to be like:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this system is evil and corrupt and contributing to it and trying to seek entry into it in hopes to change it is not an effective strategy.”

 

And he’s always been an advocate of the opposite. To siege it, to besiege it, to starve it. And yeah there’s no point, you know, running at it, doing a hero run, you know, charging at the castle walls, you’re just going to get pinged by some dude with an arrow. You’ve got to just wait it out, you’ve got to siege it, not wait it out and do nothing. But there’s a lot of things you can do while besieging an enemy.

 

And so people have to think creatively about what that means. And not but again, all politics, all politics, when it is in its infancy, attracts radical people. And radical people are more prone to self destructive behaviour. And so you want to have people that are courageous, you want to have courageous men, you want to have courageous leaders. And courageous does not mean foolish!

 

And so you do have to balance the concepts of bravery and courage with patience. And there’s a lot of virtue, a lot of virtue in having the strength to put yourself against a system that’s destroying you without becoming a martyr, you know, without letting the system destroy you. Now if you step over that line and the system puts you in jail for life or you get assassinated, like George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

I mean, Matt Hale, for example, who was involved, my understanding, with the creativity movement, he wasn’t the founder, but he was like the young hotshot that was rising up. And I think he’s in jail for life. I think he gets out of jail in about 10 years time from now. And he’s been in jail for like 20 years. Guys like Matt Howell, for example, just got really unlucky. They got. He got really unlucky and he got caught up in something that he hadn’t. I’ve looked at the case, I’ve looked at the case, the facts of the case, and the guy hasn’t done anything wrong. They could just. He was just a serious threat to the system and something like that could happen to me. But God willing, I’m safe from that level of corruption!

 

[07:42]

 

And I think it might be good luck, it might just be good luck! It might be destiny. But you don’t, what is it? You don’t count your chickens until they come home to roost or something? It’s still early days. It’s very early days. I’m still a young man. I might be bald, but I’m young and fit.

 

So, yeah, it’s, I’m 33 years old this year as of this month. And yeah, there’s a lot of struggle to go.

 

Just open with that if you haven’t checked it out, don’t be intimidated by the fact that it’s five hours. It is broken down into separate conversations. There’s an hour and then there’s a break and then there was meant to be an another hour and a break. But it, the first hour, the first two hours is very consumable for most people.

 

And then obviously, if you’re really into this stuff and you go for long drives and, or you work a job where you can have a, your headphones in a lot of tradies and stuff. Tell me that they like the five hour streams. Don’t be intimidated by having these really long streams. They appreciate, they appreciate the dialogue.

 

So as long as not too often. I don’t think you should listen to streams every day and I don’t think you should listen to music every day. I have been doing a fair bit of community service. I got to do knitting, as you’re all aware, and I advise people not to, I listen to music sometimes the whole time, or a podcast or an audio book. Books are probably the best thing. Books are better than streams because books, streams and dialogue and conversations aren’t as sharp. There’s no way I can communicate with you as clearly and as sharply as, say, reading Mein Kampf on audiobook. It’s not possible because of all the jargon. Those are the clearest thoughts possible. And then they go through an editing process.

 

So where are we? So already in the chat. Already in the chat! They’re arguing about Christianity already. Instantly! It’s incredible! Christianity will come up in this stream. When we talk about Manosphere, we’re going to cover feminism in general. We’re going to talk about all this girl bossing that’s going on at the moment with the Evangelicals. And there’s some heinous stuff that I’ve seen on Twitter where these little soy boy freaks are marrying these goblina jewesses with like 100 body counts. And they’re just saying:

 

“But she’s saved by Christ!”

 

And so it will come up. The conversation will come up. When we’re talking about that. There is definitely part one of this stream. What I’m going to open with is I’ll just. People still saying the volume’s low. Let me just unmute myself. Hold on. Now we’re. I could put up 175. I’ll just go 200. I’ll go 200. Okay. People still complaining. 200%. 200% Audio input, capture, volume. And the mic is like an inch from my face, maybe two. Two inches. Audio input, capture. I’ll put this one at 150. Alrighty. How does that sound? Testing for the last time. Testing. Yeah, fair enough. It is pretty quiet. Yeah, there’s a lot of retards in the chat today. Classic. Everyone’s spurging out. Yeah, that does sound better.

 

All right, sweet. Everyone’s arguing over which strain of Christianity. It’s incredible! It’s incredible! It’s endless. It’s endless, isn’t it? It never ends. It never ends.

 

So to start with the Aboriginal question. So obviously we are still what I am, and I have friends and we are trying to get a political party on the table here in Australia. And so covering the Aboriginal question, and you could call it the woman question, is really important. And it has to be done in a way that’s legal because of these laws here in Australia. And it has to be done in a way that people can understand the values and the rhetoric without getting caught up in the emotional arguments. So one has to be cautious when they approach these two topics. So you might find my speech slightly more refined than normal.

 

Hitler won the female vote in Germany. He actually had more women vote for him than men. And that’s a really interesting phenomenon to consider that more women voted for Hitler than men.

 

And so it shows that women don’t have to necessarily like you in order to respect you and I think that’s an important dynamic. A lot of people have commented, including Mason, about how journalists have behaved, female journalists specifically have behaved when interviewing me. And I saw someone online describe it as “negative tingles”, that they’re not used to someone outside the court giving them negative tingles. Normally it’s boring. Normally their job is boring. And then to have someone that’s got an intense character and an intense personality, it hits the dopamine receptors differently. And I’ve seen grandmas on Facebook comment sections in replies to these interviews saying, “hail Australia”. And all the criticism and all the advice people try to give us over the years is all wrong. It’s all backwards. It’s actually all the other way around. The female question is the opposite of the current orthodoxy, the current belief system of how women should be treated and how politics affects women. It’s all wrong. It’s all an inversion of the truth!

 

The truth is that it comes down to respect! And they respect integrity, not niceties! They don’t respect niceties, they respect integrity. And they respect aggression as long as it’s a as long as it’s not a foolish, foaming at the mouth, barbaric aggression. They don’t have much respect for that, but they almost respect that more and get better tingles from that than Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese. These characters provide no stimulation to the female political psyche. And so understanding how to win the woman vote, you’re not going to win it with outright misogyny. That’s obviously ridiculous! This idea of just be a prick and you’ll get voted in. That’s not what I’m articulating.

 

[16:04]

 

What I’m saying is that people should not continue to spread the lie and demoralisation within our broader scene, our broader movement and political parties in the West, that the way to win the woman vote is to pander to them. That’s really what this comes down to, is the pandering.

 

So that’s a subject on its own that I’ll cover. So that’s what you got to look forward to.

 

But first we’re going to talk about the Aboriginal question and specific. We’ve talked about both these questions a lot, but the reason why it’s come up again is I’ve had a lot of people in person and online message me saying:

 

“Why is our strategy to go to war with Aboriginals? Won’t we win more votes and won’t we do better in Parliament and won’t our message be more well received if we don’t go to war?”

 

These are their words, not mine, with Aboriginals. And my position is not that we’re going to war with Aboriginals.

 

And obviously the Camp Sovereignty situation has played a part in this dialogue because people think that the reason why there’s allegedly an incident on that hill was because of the Aboriginal question. And it’s completely it’s not irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant, but people are conflating and the media has done this. The media has purposefully misled people and made a significant portion of people that support us question their support on the basis of:

 

“Well, why would they attack innocent elderly Aboriginal women?”

 

And most people can see through it. But there is a portion of our supporters that are like:

 

“Oh, I don’t think that was a good move. You probably shouldn’t have attacked innocent elderly Aboriginal women.”

 

And it’s, well, one, that didn’t happen and two, the conflict., … And this is the position that interestingly, a lot of Aboriginals actually share, not all, but a lot, is that the issue is these White traitors.

 

And so if these White traitors didn’t behave the way they did, there wouldn’t be as much conflict between the Whites and the Aboriginals. And you’ll find there’s a lot of, probably a higher percentage of Aboriginal DNA Aboriginals that aren’t supportive of multiculturalism. And there is, the Left call it like an Uncle Tom syndrome, obviously. But my position has always been towards all races that it’s about respect. And it’s a zero sum game a lot of the time regarding resources and living space. That’s zero sum.

 

And so there’s going to have to be compromise or there’s going to be if there’s not some sort of what I’ve always said about the question of re-migration is people bring up the Aboriginals, whenever you talk about re-migration they say:

 

“Oh, but what about the Aboriginals? They were here before you!”

 

So because of that, they’re in their own select category. And what I’ve been trying to explain to people online is that Aboriginals have a choice. And this is the sound bite and this is what you should be saying to if I know a lot of people have an Aboriginal friend, or a part Aboriginal friend, this is what you say to them:

 

“Our position is that you either have part sovereignty over the whole or over full sovereignty over the part. But you can’t have both.”

 

I’ll explain that again. The Aboriginal people can either have part sovereignty over all, or full sovereignty over part. They can’t have both! That’s not a compromise. That’s White genocide. So White people, Anglo, Celtic people predominantly have come to this continent because the continent wasn’t a country, or a nation, it was a continent. It’s a land mass. It’s an island, a big island.

 

But we’ve come to this place. There’s a whole bunch of warring Aboriginal tribes. Some are in cahoots and some aren’t in cahoots. Some have been here 10,000 years. Some have potentially been here 40,000 years. The numbers keep changing. But either way, we came here and we built something separate to them. We tried to include them. There’s a lot of interesting history from the first and Second Fleet and from Arthur and Bligh, Philip. There’s some interesting history where they’ve tried to integrate the Aboriginals and it’s almost always backfired horribly on both the Whites and on the Aboriginals.

 

And so when you look at and Auspill’s done a very good job at covering this, when there has been massacres of Aboriginals, so-called these genocides or massacres, it’s always come down to establishing the Anglo Saxon law on the land. It’s come down to:

 

“Hey, we want this land, we want this territory. We’re bigger and stronger than you. We’re not going to come after you, we’re not going to attack you. But we want this much space. And, it’s living space for Whites. Europe has to breathe out. We’re overcrowded in the streets of London. We’ve got this problem with criminals or petty criminality, people stealing Spoons and stuff. We’re running out of space. We found this place. We’re in a geopolitical issue with all these other people. We can’t explain this to you. We just need what we, what we need. And we’re prepared to fight for it! And your options are to fight us or to just keep moving deeper and deeper into the bush and away from this spot. It’s ours now. You’re not having it back.”

 

[22:11]

 

And obviously anyone in their right mind would be pissed off by that. If some alien force came, you know, from space and did that to us right now and we had really little ability to fight back because they were so technologically advanced, we would rightfully be pissed off, wouldn’t we? But we would have to retreat into the bush, we would have to White flight. We would have to be like, this is too much. We have to consolidate what we’re doing.

 

And so this is beyond Good and Evil. This is a, this is Nietzschean in this concept. The Left try to put a moral framework on that and say:

 

“That’s wrong, that’s evil. And therefore we have to surrender Australia to everyone! We have to be cucks, we have to bend over and we have to let anyone come here and rape us because of this founding moment!”

 

Because White people equals bad as their moral framework. That is their entire moral framework. White people equals bad. And they’ve got this original sin concept:

 

“We’re bad people! We’re horrible people! We’re horrible, bad people!”

 

Now, obviously straight White men don’t think this way. The only people that think this way are people with slave morality, which is homosexuals, freaks, a lot of women unfortunately think this way:

 

“Oh, no, we’re horrible! What we’ve done is so horrible!”

 

You know, this kind of bleeding heart. Not all women, but it is a naturally, it is a feminine energy to put your empathy for others. Well, it’s not even a, it’s a distortion of feminine energy really.

 

But look, it appeals, it appeals to weak willed people. Masculine men don’t think like this. Testosterone doesn’t allow your brain to even go there. We’ve got a completely different philosophical structure, a completely different reality because we’ve got a solar morality. It really comes down to these simple principles. It’s not about good and evil, it’s about solar morality. It’s about, we are a life form, we must exist, we must continue to exist. We don’t have to be pricks about it, we don’t have to be cunts about it. But we’re not going to back down, we’re not going to surrender, we’re not going to roll over and die. And so how do we make this work?

 

And so obviously, while we’re in a nice friendly talking phase about it, I don’t have an issue with Aboriginal sovereignty. It’s not my issue. I don’t. Good on them, Good for them. That’s my position on the Aboriginals. Good for them! If they can have it, good on them.

 

But it’s got nothing to do with me. I’m not paying for it, I’m not engaged in it, I’m not involved in it. It’s not in my face, it’s not in my place, it’s not in my space. It’s in their space. Now that is the problem! That is the problem is that multiculturalism is forcing all these radically different people to live together. And we’re not meant to live that is going to be the death of us. It’s going to be the death of our culture.

 

Now these people, they have a flag, they have a tribe, they have an identity. They’re trying to rebuild their culture. Good on them. My opinion, and I think the opinion of most Aboriginals and most White people is that they should do it on their own! I think they’ve had enough help. We’ve done enough to help them, more than enough to help them. It’s not our responsibility to help them any further.

 

What part of the land are they going to get? Well, that is the most serious conversation. But the philosophy behind that conversation I think is congruent. I think we can, I think all Australians can get on board with the idea that we have a two-state solution, at a minimum. To me, that’s the minimum. If they want to go to war with us, that’s a different conversation.

 

But I think you’ll find that there could be conversations where they have their own government, they have their own schools, they have their own institutions. Are they going to be as good as ours? No, they’re not. Is that going to cause the bleeding hearts to be like:

 

“See we’re still continuing to oppress them by keeping them separate!”

 

And there’ll be an anti-apartheid argument, but apartheid is the most beneficial thing for both parties. Because they will never have dignity, they will never have sovereignty and they will never have dignity while we play this passive aggressive game where they’re trying to rule over us and we’re trying to say we’re all friends, Kumbaya. That is never, while both of us are actually suffering. So I’ve said in the past things like if they want to, if they want to fight, they might get deported too. They’ll get deported back to India. They walked here 40,000 years ago. They might get told to walk back.

 

And I’ve said things like those are very strong comments and obviously a lot of Aboriginal people want to fight me because of those comments.

 

But that is my position. I’m not backing down on that. I’m never going to change my mind on that is my position. It’s a two-state solution or it’s that because we cannot continue. And when we take power in this country, and we are going to take power in this country, we are going to solve this question and we are going to say:

 

“Let’s sit down, let’s draw up the map and here is a fundamental treaty of you will not let China put bases on your land, you will not let any foreigners put bases on your land, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Like there will be a treaty that will say:

 

“You are a vassal of our realm. This is Australdom, this is our realm, you’re a vassal, you’ve got a territory, you self govern it.”

 

Whether we trade or buy or sell or communicate with each other, whether there’s tourist visas, all this is downstream. We can work something out where they can come visit us and we can go visit them.

 

[28:08]

 

The bleeding hearts can go live with the Aboriginals. But you will not put Chinese bases on it. Like this is fortress Australia. We’re not going to tolerate it and you guys can police yourselves. You can have your own laws, you can have your own courts, you can have your own koori justice and your own jails and your own prisons, and all the complaints that they have all solved overnight. All solved overnight. We have nothing to do with it. We have nothing to do with it. We have no part of it! You want to go spear each other, that’s your culture. That we’re not going to intervene. And that is the absolute best outcome for everyone involved! That it’s the best compromise for us. Certainly it’s the best compromise. Is it perfect? Is it ideal? Can we purity spiral and get a better result? Sure, absolutely!

 

Is that feasible? Of course, anything is feasible if you put your mind to it. Is that how the Australian public feel? No, the Australian public don’t feel that there could be something more than that. There might be people that want to do more than that and go further, certainly. And that ethnic tension arises from living together. But I think once you find, once you take that step in that direction, I think you will find that tension will disappear.

 

So when people say to me:

 

“Tom you know why are we doing this? Anti Aboriginal rhetoric and da, da and we should try to win the Aboriginals over and we should., …”

 

The way they’re talking is they’re treating Aboriginals the same way. They’re like:

 

“We should try to win women over. We should try to win!”

 

It’s kind of similar to attitude. It’s like that’s not how it works. You don’t win Aboriginals over by pandering to them. You don’t win women over by pandering to them. I know they’re two very different biological forms. You know, obviously one is male and female. One is just female. You know, when we’re talking about women, we’re talking about White women, obviously. And I’m not making any further comparisons in that regard.

 

But if you understand, what I’m saying is the politics of the White man, the politics of the White Patriarchy, is not about pandering! Our politics is about laying down the law, explaining what we’re going to do and why we’re going to do it and how we’re going to do it. And then saying:

 

“This is the best outcome for everyone. What we’re doing right now is not working and we’re not making any further compromises on that’s the line in the sand.”

 

We’re actually only going to go further than that, we’re not going to come any less than that.

 

There is never, in my opinion, there’s never going to be a time where I or the vast majority of White people in Australia are going to accept are our slow ethnic replacement. It might appear that way right now, but it’s only because we’re not politically organised. This is not how the average Australian feels. This is not how the average White person around the world feels. The average White person around the world wants re-migration. They want to remain, at a minimum, 90%. That’s like the beginning. That’s not even, like controversial anymore, that the 90% or the 95% rule. That is the super majority of the population. I just like deport all of them except the good ones. That’s the super majority. And then you’ve probably still got the majority saying:

 

“No, no, it shouldn’t be 90, it should be 99%.”

 

So, yeah, anyway, I’ll pause there. I won’t cover that subject much more. Oh, my God! There’s a sorry, there’s a spastic in the chat. How do I do ban this person for life? I don’t want to mute. I keep making this mistake. If I mute, then I can’t ban. Isn’t that right? Okay, that just deleted it. Oh, yeah. Also muting on Rumble because Odysee is different. Muting on Rumble is banning. Cool. Glad we got that sorted.

 

I’ll go through the comments section. If there’s any comments on the Aboriginal question. Geez, everyone’s just arguing about Christianity. We’re not even talking about Christianity. We’re just talking about Aboriginals at this stage.

 

So, yeah, in short, as I said before, tell your friends that say this nonsense to you about how we should work together:

 

“We all got to work together. We all got to work together.”

 

They can have full sovereignty over themselves, but not us. Or they can have this fake sovereignty over everyone. Do they actually want full sovereignty? If they do, it can only be over themselves. That means apartheid. Ultimately, that means apartheid. What that looks like is a man can’t serve the Australian flag and the Aboriginal flag. You can’t go to a at the high school, at the courts, all these institutions. It’s got an Australian flag and it’s got an Aboriginal flag. That is not sustainable. It’s one or the other. It can’t be both.

 

And this idea of:

 

“Oh, we got to show solidarity and they’re not a threat to us and all this.”

 

It’s not sustainable. It’s not sustainable. It’s nice. Tingle feels. It feels really nice:

 

“Oh, look, I’m being empathetic. Oh, I’m a good person.”

 

You can have this virtue signaling, but we’re two very different peoples. We need to have sovereignty over ourselves. They need to have sovereignty over themselves. We need to be focused on Australia and White people and civilisation, the Western civilisation that we’re a part of, and they need to be focused on creating their own harmony, the dream time, their version of reality, fixing their problems, punishing their problems. They have a completely different version of reality to us. That is just how different ethnic groups and different races are built. They have different versions of reality. Things we see as a problem that they see it like a major problem, they see as a minor problem, and vice versa. Their biggest issue is White people are locking them up and putting them in jail. Like, they can’t even comprehend that our problem is that they’re committing heinous crimes. They can’t even comprehend that’s a problem. They see the problem as:

 

“Why are you locking us up?”

 

[35:04]

 

It’s the same with the blacks in America. How can these two groups of people live together when they have completely different versions of reality? So they should police themselves. Simple as! Part sovereignty over all or full sovereignty over part.

 

So you can’t have both. Simple. As I’ll move on. Hopefully the comment section is not talking about Christianity, someone says:

 

“Do I make my own toothpaste?”

 

Very funny. Yeah. And this applies not just to Australia, this applies to obviously, Canada and New Zealand as well. I think the Treaty of Waitangi is a mistake in New Zealand. I don’t know too much about the treaties in Canada. I know Alex Ferryman does. Yeah, it’s a mistake. It’s a mistake. Any treaty that exists needs to be a treaty of:

 

“Here’s your space. Here’s our space. You live there, we live here. You’re citizens of your country. We’re citizens of our country. We’re two separate nations. We’re not the same nation.”

 

They even call themselves the first nation so that by definition, they’re not part of our nation. They’re saying this. They’re saying this, not me. They are saying it. What else?

 

Let’s get into the nuts and bolts. The woman question. I need a need a breather. If we’re going to get into the woman question. I need a breather. Yeah. Someone says:

 

“Easiest solution is allow those same bleeding hearts to transfer their own funds to Aboriginals, not government or social funds. The Left can put their money where their mouth is.”

 

Yeah, absolutely! Well, I believe that all the bleeding hearts should go live with the Aboriginals. They should have Aboriginal citizenship. They want to be so bad. They hate White people so much. They hate being White!:

 

“White people are horrible, horrible people! And having White children is perpetuating White supremacy and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Good bye. Bye. See you later. Awesome! You know, we’ll strip all of these people of Australian citizenship when we come to power and there will be people that will say:

 

“Oh, my God, you can’t do that!”

 

Yes, we can and we will. They’re all going to get stripped of their Australian citizenship. These White people that work, that bow down and worship Aboriginals as their god. They can go live with their god. They can go live with their god. Simple. You know, you want to do the Welcome to Country acknowledgment of country, all this. Absolutely perfect! Perfect. Absolutely! Bye. Bye. Yeah, we don’t want those people living in our society. It doesn’t matter that they’re of the same blood as us. That doesn’t matter because they’re not of the same honour as us. They hate us! There are some sort of mutation of our bloodline that is antithetical to our existence. If Aboriginals didn’t exist, they would find some other group to nut hug. Hypothetically, because there’s no Aboriginals in England. Like you don’t see people advocating for the pre-Belgic-Celtic invasion of Bronze Age England. That doesn’t exist. You know, what kind of strain of Leftism would that be? You know, it’s obviously absurd because you’ve got a thousand years of homogeneity of many different layers of Celtic peoples then breeding in with many different layers of Germanic and Nordic peoples.

 

So it’s the English people, the British people are a relatively homogenised people. And so you don’t see that argument because those tribes can homogenise quite. I mean, obviously it still caused things like, I mean, I don’t want to get too much into the intricacies of English history, but you can see the precursor of things like civil war in previous ethnic distinctions.

 

So, for example, Croatia and Serbia are ethnically very similar, but they’re not ethnically the same. They are two different ethnicities and therefore they also have two different versions of their interpretation of Christianity. You’ve got Orthodoxy and you’ve got Catholicism. So ethnic differences play out also religiously and also politically. You’ll see this a lot through human history. You see it in the American Civil War. There was an ethnic difference in the American Civil War as well. Probably not as predominant, but I won’t go into it. Americans know that for themselves.

 

Now someone says:

 

“Tom’s right. They have a different reality. Go to any Northern Territory prison and you’ll see the system isn’t working.”

 

It’s not working by our standards. Absolutely! Our version, our reality of working and their version of working are two completely different things.

 

And I’ll finish it with this. I had a Dreamtime experience with Aboriginals. I’m sure I’ve told this story on stream years ago, so those that have been around a while will remember this story. But I had a friend in the army, a guy called Christopher Knight. He was a Special Forces guy. He’s a translator, he’s a linguist. And I don’t know what he’s doing now with his life, but I’m sure he’s doing well. And he was adopted. He got adopted in a cultural sense, or a linguistic sense by an Aboriginal. An Aboriginal tribe in Darwin in Northern Territory. And this guy was a, like one of those, what is called politician-linguist or something. This guy spoke like 50 languages. It was incredible! I’ve never seen anything like it. I mean, we would go out drinking in Mitchell street or whatever it’s called in the CBD of Darwin. It’s like one street and there’s like four bars on it. And any backpacker, he could speak their language. Any backpacker. It was really incredible!

 

[41:09]

 

Anyway on his weekends, he was going out and living with Aboriginals out in the middle of nowhere. And there were like some, there were full bloods and it’s very rare to find full bloods, but in Northern Territory it’s more common. There’s no way you can find full bloods outside of Northern Territory or Northern New, Southern Queensland or Northern WA. And he started hanging out with these, basically semi-nude Aboriginals in the bushland near Casuarina Beach on the weekends. And he knocks on my door. I don’t know, it was like one in the morning, one random. It was like a Tuesday, or a Thursday. And he says:

 

“Hey Tom or hey Sewell.”

 

Everyone calls you by your last name in the army:

 

“Hey Sewelly, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. They need a linguist. He was a two commando guy, but for some reason he was in our battalion. And he says, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. I’m getting on a plane and I have to say goodbye to some people and I had to run some errands. Can you drive me?”

 

Because I was one of the only LID, which lid means new guy or live in digger. I was one of the only LID that had a car. And I was friendly with him, and everyone thought he was a weirdo and I did as well. Weird means different things to me than it does to other people. When someone says weird, they mean like not radioactive, but they mean, you know, semi-ostracized. They mean:

 

“Oh, we don’t associate with that guy because he’s a weirdo!”

 

Whereas when someone’s weird, I am fascinated by human psychology. And so I was always very friendly with him because I wanted to know what made him tick. He had such a different version of reality to everyone else that I just really wanted to understand. I mean this guy was probably in his early 30s and I think I was 19 or 20 at the time.

 

So I was like:

 

“Unk, how do you view the world? What’s going on, Unk?”

 

Basically I was the same relationship I have with Zoomers and is like that relationship when I was The Age that a lot of Zoomers are that asked me for advice And I’m now. I’m now 90.

 

But anyway, he says, he’s like:

 

“Sewelly, you’re the only one with a car. You know, can you drive me around? I gotta say goodbye to some people.”

 

And so he drives me out in the middle of nowhere, and then we go walking for like 40 minutes down this beach. And I’m like:

 

“What are we doing?”

 

And we find these Aboriginals just on this beach in the middle of nowhere. And they’re all sitting cross legged and around a little campfire. And he introduces me to them and he’s speaking their language, like full Aboriginal! Like whatever sect of Aboriginal they are. And he’s speaking their language. And he introduces me and he says a bunch of Aboriginal words.

 

And then he says my name. And then he says:

 

“5 RAR, 5th Battalion.”

 

And I was like:

 

“What did you say to them?”

 

And he said:

 

“You’re a young warrior from my tribe, from the 5th Battalion tribe. And that you’re a good warrior. You’re a good, young, strong warrior and that you’re helping me today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh.”

 

And then they all, like, acknowledged me. They’re all sitting different. So it was men. I was sitting with the men, obviously, and the women were sitting at a different campfire with the women, and it was segregated.

 

And so I was with the men and Knighty was explaining to them how I was a good warrior, a good young warrior of the 55 RAR tribe. And we’re sitting there and they’re just talking and talking, and I went into a trance. I was tired, but I didn’t know what was, … It was like someone had drugged me. I was in a trance and I was just staring at the ocean, because we’re on the beach. And I was staring at the ocean and the sky was purple.

 

And I was like:

 

“Is there something in this fireplace? Like, what? Like, am I on?”

 

I’ve never at this stage, I’d never tried any drug ever!

 

And I was like:

 

“Is this what acid feels like?”

 

That’s what I was thinking in my head.

 

And I was like:

 

“What is going on?”

 

And they’re making that noise that they make. They’re talking and yeah. And then the sun’s coming up and I’m like, what is going on? And I look at the time and it’s like 6:30. And it was just surreal! It was a surreal experience. And then he’s like:

 

“All right, we’re gonna go.”

 

He gave them bananas and double A batteries. And he taught them how to like Jerry rig a phone to be able to give co-ordinates so that he could communicate where they were in the bush using GPS. And it was just fascinating! It was just absolutely fascinating! That was my first positive experience with Aboriginals. And I had had only about 500 negative experiences with Aboriginals prior to that moment. And every negative experience I’d had with Aboriginals was them being drunk, or not even drunk, but them just behaving the way they behave, and then being violent and aggressive towards me for just existing, for just walking down the street or just going to the shops at two o’ clock in the afternoon. Or them harassing like pregnant ladies trying to get in their car, demanding money off them. Like just every experience I had was so negative.

 

[46:02]

 

And then this was the first time I was like:

 

“I think I’m starting to understand these people. They live in a dream time.”

 

Like the proper full bloods. They live in a different reality to us. They don’t like time. The way we view time and the way they view time is completely different! And I somehow empathed in that moment into their little hive mind with Knightie, who was like my guide. His name was Christopher Knight, like a knight of Christ! And he was a very spiritually attuned man. And that was an experience I’ll never forget. I think I was almost, 20 years old. I was only 19!

 

But yeah, very interesting stuff. Very, very interesting stuff.

 

The stream looks frozen on my end. What is going on? No, no, it’s not frozen. Excellent! Yeah. What can I say? What can I say? I’ve seen the best of it and I’ve seen the worst of it. And the best of it is we should just leave these people alone. Like the problem is enlightenment. In a lot of ways, [chuckling] enlightenment has benefits, certainly. I’m not anti-enlightenment. You know, that’s a big part of how we’ve come to be. And it was a big part of our life cycle as a civilisation. It’s the second last phase of civilisation is enlightenment. The Greeks went through this around, I don’t know, 400 B.C. And yeah, I’m not against, you can’t be against it because it’s nature, it’s time itself.

 

But one of the dumbest parts of enlightenment is “equality”. That’s the dumbest part of enlightenment. The, the, that is the false enlightenment. The false enlightenment is that we’re all blank slates and that we’re all equal. That you know:

 

“All men are created equal before God and blah blah, blah!”

 

That is the most. How the hell. I don’t even know if they sincerely believe that. I can’t even fathom that they were that stupid that the people that colonised Australia, … Because when I read Clark, I’ve got it right here actually, this one here.

 

So this guy’s a communist. He’s a piece of shit, Leftist communist! And he wrote A History of Australia. I have, I’ve only read this one. I haven’t read the other volumes. I think this one ends around 1830. And he wrote this in I think 1961 or 62. And he’s a full blown communist and was investigated by ASIO for being, for coordinating with. Here’s the big boy here. Here’s the main man. Here’s the main man. Mr. Cook. Captain Cook. Anglo Saxon. Anglo Saxon. But yeah, Melbourne University. He’s a commie at Melbourne University.

 

Anyway, I read it. It’s quite interesting, quite subversive. But he, oh, he really emphasises the how enlightened Captain Cook and you know, Arthur Bligh and all these guys were and how they, but what’s interesting is he can’t hide the fact that despite their Enlightenment, despite the fact that they. Excuse me. They arrived in Australia and they tried to treat the Aboriginals as equals.

 

And so they’re like:

 

“Hey, let’s trade.”

 

And then there was nothing to trade. So they were like:

 

“Hey, let’s, …”

 

It was like a clash of values because they had these Enlightenment values and they didn’t know how to implement them on the Aboriginals. They didn’t know.

 

And so there was a whole bunch of different treat ways the Aboriginals were treated by European colonists. And I think it was the Portuguese and the Spanish in the Americas, but a little bit even in the Asia Pacific region, the Portuguese were in Asia Pacific as well. And they were basically like:

 

“You’re going to convert to Catholicism by the sword!”

 

And what Clark says is that they didn’t have those Enlightenment values. So you’ve got like Protestant Anglos trying to communicate with Aboriginals and like uplift them into humanity and uplift them into civility.

 

And then you’ve got the Portuguese with almost like pre-Enlightenment Catholic values that were just like “convert or die”. And that’s quite interesting. You know, it’s possible to talk about history without talking about Christianity. But yeah, that’s quite interesting. I won’t expand on that too much. You can gather from that what you want.

 

Yeah, where was I going with that? Yeah, he has all these little anecdotes or all these little stories about these first encounters and how, yeah, the enlightened English were just bewildered and were just like:

 

“We’ve never encountered this anywhere in the world!”

 

And he’s actually honest about the criticisms that they had. I think he might over embellish their enlightenment principles. I think they were probably a lot more racist than what he’s articulating because he’s a communist.

 

But yeah, I think I titled this Aboriginal communism, didn’t I? Before we get into the woman question, ultimately, if we don’t segregate from Aboriginals, we’re going to get destroyed by Aboriginal communism the way that what’s going on in South Africa, they’re dealing with African communism. And when you end apartheid and you mix or you attempt to get the races to all live together in equality and one is so different to the other, it’s a race to the bottom! And that’s ultimately what communism is, it’s a race to the bottom.

 

And it’s not just anti-enlightenment because there’s a lot of things that are anti-enlightenment, but it is anti-life! It’s ultimately anti-life because our version of life is an upward force, not a, so it’s hard to cover this without getting into the Greeks. You got to get into the Greeks because they figured all this out! And I don’t mean like the Greeks is in the souvlaki shop. I mean like the ancient Greeks, the philosophy.

 

The Greeks realised that when they went through their enlightenment that there’s not just being, there’s becoming. And that the ultimate being is becoming. And we use the word “progress” now and that word is obviously really dirty and that’s why I don’t use it. It’s a very dirty word. To say something is “progressive”, you’re saying it’s Leftist.

 

[53:19]

 

And so the Leftists have actually somehow inverted “becoming” into “progression”. And so when they say it’s progressive, it’s actually regressive! It’s regressive of the total life force. Leftism is the downward path. It’s not Left versus Right, it’s up versus down! And this is something that you really need to understand. Communism, Aboriginal communism, jewish communism, any form of communism, any form of Leftist progression is a progression downwards! It’s progressing the life form downwards. And this applies to even politics of today.

 

So if you want to talk about party politics, if you want to call it that if you want to talk about Parliamentarianism, what the Labor Party here in. I know this is people like, I’m tuning out. I don’t want to hear this. But normies want to hear this. Normies, you do need to. If you’re listening to this, you’re probably not a normie. And you do need to know how to apply the logic that I’m articulating here in the stream to things other than ancient Greece and ancient Rome and like all this stuff, you need to be able to apply it to be able to explain it to, … You need to be able to speak in tongues and that doesn’t mean like that crazy Evangelical crap. That means you need to be able to speak the tongue of the people.

 

And so what the Labor Party here in Australia has done is they’ll get lost on this because they haven’t read a book on economics, but it’s this Keynesian economics where it’s window breaking. So they believe that if you keep breaking windows, the GDP will go up because the glazier is going to make more money. And, it’s all that in conjunction with Fabian socialism. So Fabian socialism is what:

 

“We want the windows to be broken because we want more money wasted on fixing windows instead of building the power system.”

 

And so Fabian socialists or Fabian Communists, Fabian Marxists. They’re ultimately Marxists. They want to create this workers revolution through accelerating the decline of society by wasting as much money as possible.

 

And so that’s why the NDIS is the way it is. That’s why the NDIS is bigger than the defense budget. That’s why we spend more money on parasites and retards than we do on protecting the nation from foreign invasion. It’s why we spend so much money on basically compounding problems. Not fixing problems, but compounding problems! And the problem itself is often the expenditure, the wastage, the fact that we’re taxing the noble, the good, the healthy, and we’re giving to the evil and the weak and the disgusting and the decrepit.

 

And this is Kali Yuga stuff. This is end of time stuff. This is what Hitler talks about in Mein Kampf. Why you have to read Mein Kampf. It’s not negotiable. It’s not negotiable! If there’s only one book you should read, it’s Mein Kampf, because he explains all of this. He explains exactly what’s happening, exactly why it’s happening and exactly what you need to do to stop it from continuing to destroy your society.

 

So that’s why they’re window breaking. That’s why the Labor Party and all the Greenies and all these freaks, they’re all on board with destroying society through taking money from good people and giving it to broken people. And what that does is that what you feed grows. And they know that! They know that! They know it and they’ve already projected how that industry is going to expand. And it is beyond political parties. I mean it’s the Uni-Party doing it. It’s not just the Labor Party. But it obviously gets worse under one and then the other does Labor Party light. They do Fabian socialism light. That’s what the Liberal Party is. It’s homosexuality light. Fabian socialism light. Retard economics light. You know it’s diet retardation!

 

Anyway. Aboriginal communism. Yeah. Where are we? Yeah. I don’t normally do Superchats mid conversation but Delvian said:

 

“Isn’t the abo love a second order consequence of White men becoming feminised and White women hating their own men?”

 

There’s definitely an element to that. I think there’s a lot of different components to the so-called “Aboriginal love”. There’s the false enlightenment, there’s self hatred. Yes. There’s virtue signaling. So society is structured wrong, which is what we’re going to get into with the feminine society and the woman question. Society is structured with an inversion of natural law. The moral framework of society is an inversion of what our society was built on.

 

So that is often described as late stage decline or degeneration where you forget what your purpose was to such an extent where it’s upside down. There’s obviously nefarious influence. There’s particular (((interest groups))) that are a particular ethno-religious orientation and they compound and accelerate and destabilise. Certainly. They’re obviously a major player in that process but it does happen on its own. And you know there’s a lot of, I won’t go into all the proverbs and quotes on the subject but this festering can only exist if you’re already going in that direction. What we need is a complete re-evaluation of values. And you know we have gone through two or three generations of a nihilist phase and we are re interpreting and revaluing our values. We are so far ahead morally of where we were 50 years ago. And people will aay:

 

“No! That’s not true. No! People were so conservative back in the day.”

 

And it’s like they were running off inertia. They hadn’t actually evaluated their values. They were just running off inertia. We’re actually so much further ahead by going through the decline, seeing the nihilism, seeing the hedonism.

 

[1:00:19]

 

 

And I have so much faith and hope in the young generation. Young White people across the world, obviously, a lot of them are infected with the social disease. A lot of them are infected. But the ones that aren’t infected with the social disease have immunity. They have immunity! They have built up. They don’t need to be injected with anything. They have natural immunity! Young White people across the Western world are growing up immune to this social disease. And the disease of our time is not the plague. It’s not the Spanish Flu. It’s not? What is it? You know, all the ones that people, tuberculosis. It’s not these things that are killing people anymore, you know.

 

And Edward Dutton covers this a lot. I’ve talked about this on streams for years and years, and I’m so glad someone actually wrote a book about it. I’ve only read the blurb. I haven’t actually read the whole book, but I might actually get around to reading it at some point. But Dutton covers this and he explains that just the mutational load has the selection process now is, are you a retard or are you not? And if you’re not a retard, you’re most likely immune to the retardation that’s destroying our society.

 

So, yeah. All right, we’ll do it. We’ll go into the woman question. Check the comments first. Someone says:

 

“Ban women!”

 

No, we don’t need to ban them. Reese White says:

 

“Thomas. So are you a fan of Adam Green?”

 

I don’t really know anything about Adam Green. I’ve seen him on Twitter. He’s the anti-Christian guy, isn’t he? He’s kind of built like a platform. I haven’t seen him at all! I’ve never spoken to him. I don’t really know anything about him. I only know of him. Yeah, I can’t comment on that question. I’ve seen a lot of people attack him saying he’s jewish, and I’ve seen him say that Christianity is jewish.

 

So it’s like everyone’s saying:

 

“You’re a jew! No, you’re a jew! No, you’re a jew!”

 

And it’s like I’m not getting into it. It’s not in my sphere. I think I’ve seen him do chats with HT [Handsome Truth]. Yeah, we will cover a little bit of Christianity here. But yeah, you all know I’m not Christian. But we will cover it and we’ll cover it in a respectful way. I think that any criticism people have of Christianity should be done respectfully. I know that’s hard to do. It is very hard to do. But this is a, yeah, I try to be as secular as possible and yeah, let’s start with that. Let’s actually start with Christianity.

 

Let’s start with. If we’re going to talk about the woman question, let’s talk about Christianity.

 

So the Hebrew mythology or the Hebrew founding story is Adam and Eve. It’s a bit different to other founding stories, but you’ll find there’s so much similarities when you’re talking about the origins of man from. And I don’t use mythology. I don’t say mythology in a bad way. I don’t say it in a, I don’t mean it in a negative way. I’m not putting a pejorative on it. You know, all founding myth is myth. It’s mythos. We don’t know for sure, but we can respect myth. I respect myth. Yeah, and geez, we’re already into it.

 

But we all know the story Genesis. So we have this perfect garden of peace and harmony and the founding story of Christianity and therefore the founding message, the founding message of Christianity is that women are inherently attracted to evil. And breaching the peace and harmony of the garden that’s created by the father.

 

So it’s kind of like women inherently have to “shit test” a situation, a society, a these aren’t my words. This is not even my personal interpretation. I didn’t come up with this is what the Bible says.

 

And anyone that has a different version of Genesis is a moron and hasn’t read it. So many Christians haven’t read the Bible. Probably one of my main issues with Christians is that they haven’t read the Bible. I don’t think you should be allowed to call yourself a Christian if you haven’t read the Bible.

 

And likewise, I don’t think people should call themselves a National Socialist if they haven’t read Mein Kampf. I don’t think you should say that. I think you should say I’m interested in National Socialism, but I don’t think you should identify with it. You should hear the words from the man. He says it all. He outlines 95% of it in one book. And it’s a lot easier to read than the Bible. The Bible is a very hard book to read. It’s very tedious at parts. It, sure, it has beautiful parts, like all religious books have beautiful parts, but it is a very hard read. It’s a very long book. It’s like a million words. It takes a long time. Unless you race through it, if you race through it, you’re going to miss things. But Genesis is very clear. Like the first books, Genesis and Exodus, these things are very clear. Very, very clear. There’s no, not much nuance to it.

 

Now there’s obviously different mythological interpretations. What is the snake and what is the apple and what is God’s command and all this. But if you’re going to found a religion off this principle, it’s going to bleed through the whole text, isn’t it?

 

So whatever you’re reading later on in the Bible has to always come back to Genesis and a belief system that men and women were created unequally, that man was created from breathing life into dust or into matter. Women were created from the rib of man, so from the side. So it’s a peer, but it’s not an equal peer. There’s some sort of difference there. And so, I mean, obviously.

 

[1:07:14]

 

But I was talking to Jacob recently and he’s been deep diving Plato. Absolutely deep diving Plato. I’ve read the Republic, but I haven’t read much else from Plato. And he was negging Aristotle, which I was surprised at because I actually prefer, at this stage, I prefer Aristotle to Plato, not to get too much into philosophy, but I’ve only read the Republic. So and I didn’t really rate it, to be honest. I thought it was an interesting dialogue, but I didn’t rate it as much as it gets glazed. But he’s been reading all the other stuff. Full deep diving into everything, every single thing the guy’s written. And what he said to me was, and this is very recently, he said to me that the Greeks believed that, or Plato believed, and this became quite a common belief system, that if that souls were created, this is before Christianity, they believe that souls were created fresh and that they were all men, that if you lived a bad life, if you were a bit, you know, weak or immoral, that you would be reincarnated in your next life as a woman. And this became a pretty well established belief system. And it’s interesting that that is in some way similar to Christianity, that they arrived at a position where they were ripe for proselytisation from Christian apostles.

 

So let’s start there. Obviously, European Paganism is many things, just as Christianity is many things. There’s so much schism within Paganism. And when you’re talking generally about Paganism, you’re talking about general principles which we know from Greek, Roman, Zoroastrian, Indus Valley, and obviously Germanic and Celtic Paganism. And people will cherry pick what they want.

 

There are female church leaders at the moment. I mean, that’s just absurd to me that the whole book is a document saying that women can’t accurately interpret God. They can’t accurately communicate or interpret or follow instruction from God. And therefore they shouldn’t be in charge of the Church. They can’t be in charge of society, they can’t be in charge of the Church. They just don’t possess the correct component to do that. And the whole religion is founded on that principle.

 

And then you have such a degradation of the Church that you now have women pastors and preachers and priests, priestesses or whatever you’d call them. I mean, it’s absurd! It’s not my church, I’m not a Christian. But the hypocrisy is despicable! It is truly despicable! So fascinating!

 

Now, Paganism has varying degrees of male and female relationships. Some interpretations of Paganism are a bit more equitable, others a lot less equitable.

 

So when we go back to the ancients and when we look at thousands of years of civilisation, there is not really any society that has treated men and women as the same, nor has there been a society that has treated women the way women are being treated right now! And it’s not a surprise that our birth rates are really low. Any society that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any civilisation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any nation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies! And therefore it is a footnote in somebody else’s history.

 

So we have to reevaluate our values and we have to completely change the way we behave or we’re going to die!

 

And so the woman question is the same question as White genocide. It’s the same question as White replacement. You cannot separate the two. You can’t say:

 

“Let’s stick to just White nationalism and let’s not talk about how evil feminism is. Let’s talk about White replacement. But we’ve got to keep women on side. We can’t say things that might hurt the feelings of women.”

 

And as I said at the start of the stream, this is a really dumb, weak, coward strategy that’s going to cause us to die as a race! Women don’t respect pandering. They find it disgusting! Feminists are pure evil! And they will because of there’s some force, you know, Christians could say they’re possessed. And I do put a lot of weight in possession. I know not everyone does because not everyone believes they have a soul. And not everyone believes in metaphysics or in like a spirit realm. And so people that are very rational will say:

 

“This person’s unwell, or this person’s mentally ill.”

 

All means the same thing. Whereas the more religious or spiritual way of looking at it is this person is spiritually ill, this person’s potentially possessed. And this isn’t very electable, but I have witnessed what I could only describe as exorcisms. I have seen the way some people have behaved, and there is no rational or logical explanation other than this person is possessed. This person has a demon, a demon in them! They’re not at rest. They’re not in harmony. They’re not. There’s something that is currently occupying them and it’s potentially just a phase, but if it keeps occurring, it’s like there’s something that rears its head, something unbecoming.

 

And that’s a difficult conversation to have with people that don’t believe in demons. They don’t believe that it could be possible. They’re so far into post Enlightenment rationalism that just:

 

“It’s so irrational, the idea that there are forces beyond our control that could perhaps be bad forces!”

 

You know, we can acknowledge that there is a good force and inherently good force on earth, but then we want to pretend that there’s not an inherently bad force on earth?

 

[1:13:57]

 

So instead of arguing about whether Christianity is cucked or not, instead a better conversation is, what can we learn from Christianity? Where is Christianity right? And where is modern Christianity wrong? Or where is Christianity philosophically wrong? That’s a much more important discussion and it’s a more respectful discussion as well. Because what you’ll find is I can have these conversations. I had a conversation recently, probably 20, 30 minutes, with some Christian guys in America, and we could have a respectful conversation about what’s happening through that lens, through that lens of that there is an evil that is possessing. There is a snake in the garden, and it’s corrupting women. And then women are corrupting men. And that women, sorry, men, are aware of the snake. Snake, but most men are not aware of how this snake has perverted women.

 

And so the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read] is we need to normalise Patriarchy. I’m a big, big proponent of Patriarchy. I think that Patriarchy is the only way to save the White race. We cannot save the White race through feminism. We cannot save the White race through equality. We can only save the White race through a proper Patriarchy. A proper Patriarchy! And whether you’re Christian, pagan, agnostic, enlightened, not enlightened, Catholic, orthodox, doesn’t matter! We cannot solve male, female. It does not matter! We cannot solve this problem without Patriarchy.

 

Now, it’s very easy for me to acknowledge Patriarchy because, one, I had a really good father. I have a really good father. My father’s still alive. I have a really good father. A really good father! And he has his flaws. Absolutely! And that’s product of environment and breeding and everything else. Right. We all have our flaws. I have my flaws. Product of environment and breeding and circumstance. But we’re on a mission! My bloodline has definitely been through the wars, and we’re on our way back up. All right. There’s a few more generations of work to do to really get us back on track. But I’m part of a Patriarchy. I have a lot of respect for my family name, my line, my lineage, my ancestry. This is really important to me.

 

And, it’s easy for me to accept and acknowledge this harsh reality. It’s not even a harsh reality. This reality because of what I come from. Women that have good fathers can accept this as well. Most women that can’t accept Patriarchy, they don’t have any respect for their fathers. And they don’t have respect for their fathers because their fathers don’t deserve respect.

 

Respect is not something that you’re entitled to. It is only earned. And I know that’s a platitude, and some people might think that’s a meaningless platitude, but that is absolutely core! Respect is earned! You’re not entitled to anyone’s respect. This is, I think, a false enlightenment principle that, like you should just respect the retard being moved around in the wheelchair. Like, what? What planet are these people on? Like, why that makes you a good person? How does that make me a good person? You know what quality of life is the drooling retard, God? And why are we wasting all our tax dollars paying for the drooling retard? This is solved very easily by Patriarchy. It’s not just solved by having a department in government that deals with the problem. It’s solved by Patriarchy.

 

And so one of the first principles of Patriarchy is that every man is king and priest and judge of his own house! I’ll say it again, for those that aren’t listening. The first principle of Patriarchy is that every man is king, is priest, is judge of his own house! And general. That was a component as well. There’s a martial component to it. And so every son, every boy wants to respect his father for the man that he is. And I can’t empath into how girls think, because I’m not a girl, but I would assume it’s similar. Not the same, but I assume it’s similar. I obviously have daughters. And you know what I was sad about when I was growing up? Not sad, but one thing I was surprised at was I asked my dad why he never joined the army. Because I know his dad was in the navy or in the Defense Force. I know his granddad was in the army.

 

And I remember asking my dad:

 

“Why weren’t you in the army?”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, look.”

 

Because they had the draught for the Vietnam War, and he was of that age, and he just never got called up. So he was like:

 

“Oh, I got lucky!”

 

That was his answer. I think he said something:

 

“I got lucky. You know, you put your birthday in. You had to register. You put your birthday in.”

 

And he said something about “balls with birthdays” on them. Like, it was like the lotto. Like, they’d pull a ball out. And if it was like, March 18th, which is my dad’s birthday, then you’re going, you’re signing up.

 

And I thought that was absurd! But it’s one way to do it. I mean, it’s fucking clown world! But anyway, that was his position, was like:

 

“Oh, he got lucky. He avoided it.”

 

And I always thought to myself, wouldn’t it be cool? I always thought, wouldn’t it be cool to walk into my dad’s office and he’s got all his, like, armour and his rifle? And I just had this idea of like. And it’s probably ancient. It’s probably something like an altar, like an altar to Mars, like an altar to masculinity, an altar to the Patriarchy. And then to be able to see my grandfathers and you know there are families that still, they keep all their family medals, the war medals and stuff.

 

[1:20:20]

 

But I mean let’s put that on steroids. It’s not just having like the medals, it’s like walk in and be able to see like generations and generations of uniforms and rifles and, or even before going all the way back to a family sword. That just, that idea is just so cool! And I think every like 10 year old boy thinks like that.

 

And if you don’t, you’re probably a faggot, or maybe you had the idea but in a different way. But if that doesn’t seem cool to you, yeah, fuck you basically! I don’t know. Yeah, you’re not in my gang, that’s for sure. You’re not in my tribe.

 

So back to the woman question. So [chuckling] respect, respect. You can respect that. And I didn’t respect my dad as much as I would have if we had something like that. If my dad had something like I kind of lost a little bit of respect for my dad when I was like 10 years old. When I was like:

 

“Why wasn’t my dad. His answer was he ‘got lucky’.”

 

I was like:

 

“Huh, I don’t know if that’s luck.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like why would that be lucky? Obviously it’s a dumb war and blah, blah, blah and geopolitics is so broken and everything now.

 

But I think part of us is whether you go and fight in a war or not, I think men should be war-like. And I think the “retard budget” should be directed entirely into well first of all we shouldn’t be taxed as much as we are. So there shouldn’t even be a retard budget.

 

But obviously I like when we take power. I’m deleting the retard budget and putting all of it or most of it or some of it into building like the Stormtrooper halo suit Department. I’ve said this before.

 

To get back onto, someone just says:

 

“Fuck employment!”

 

[chuckling] Modern world does a Superchat:

 

“Thoughts on the employee question.”

 

I actually haven’t watched the podcast that young Michael Nelson did on the subject of employment but I can imagine what he was saying. My position has always been that you need to be productive, you need to be productive, you need to find a way of being productive. You don’t want to just sit around doing nothing! But you need to have times of sitting around doing nothing in order to think of productive things to do.

 

And when you’re in employment, like I have had nothing but issues with like Gen-X’s and Boomers that have employed me over the years where they want you to work 50, 60 hour weeks, they want you just in employment, they want you just head down and just hammer drill in the concrete and just ernnn! Or if you’re doing some other job that’s slightly more technical or less manual labour, it’s the same thing. It’s just head down and you’ve just got no time, no time to be a better man. You’re just stuck in a trap! You’re stuck in like a debt trap. And I don’t think there’s ever been a time in human history where anyone except slaves have worked six days a week or even five days a week. I just think that that’s slavery and they’re boxing us in. We’re getting boxed in and boxed in and boxed in! It’s so obvious what’s happening and it’s so obvious why Zoomers especially and Gen Alpha will be even more so, why people are checking out of this employee, … We’re just getting boxed in.

 

Like we’ve gone from nice blocks of land. There’s plenty of things to do, there’s plenty of animals to tend to. And then you work a couple days a week, you know, old mate needs help with something, you go help him, this guy and people were these warrior farmer builders first, and they were doctors and doctors and dentists and lawyers and tradesmen or skilled labourers second. And it was the pleb class. It’s always historically been the pleb class that became entirely microscopically focused on a singular trade. So like I do pottery, that’s all I do they live in a tiny little house in the city in Rome and they’re the Potter. And all they do is pottery and they just make pots and nothing else. And they do it six days a week, 12 hours a day. And they make pots and they sell the pots and they make pots and they sell the pots. That is what slaves do. That’s what slaves do. That’s slavery!

 

And so, but the whole economics is geared against us because of what they’ve done, because of interest, because of debt slavery. It’s because of debt slavery we can’t build intergenerational wealth where we can have big families on large plots of land where we can learn a whole bunch of skills and manage our farms and feed ourselves and look after ourselves in tight knit communities.

 

The whole economics is now geared that everyone’s a little bug, a little cog in the system. They do their little bug roll and they get their little bug ration and this is broken. This is not sustainable. It’s not going to last. How many generations is this going to go on for? Judging by how much Zoomers want to check out, I’d suggest that Alphas or Betas or what like two or three generations from now, if this problem hasn’t solved itself, I would assume things are gonna be very different.

 

[1:26:10]

 

 

And obviously tying this into politics we’re gonna completely change the zoning laws. Part of the problem with this is people living on 200 square metre little blocks, apartments, townhouses. Part of this is just so dysgenic. We need to not be slave bug people. We need space, we need land, we need multitudes of tasks. Specialisation is key. Don’t get me wrong. We built higher civilisation because individuals did hyper specialise into things. But making pots is not a hyper specialisation. You know what I mean? Like historically people did their specialisation part time. They’d worked a couple days a week doing, and it was usually what was called journeymen. They were usually journeymen like if they were a dentist, or a doctor or whatever and obviously there was no such thing as a lawyer. The whole system worked differently, like tradition, ancient culture and the higher becoming. We have better technology now, but it’s made us, I think we can do both. I think we can continue to improve technology without living like bugs. And I don’t think that interest slavery helped us increase our technology. The increasing technology is part of the life cycle. It’s part of the life cycle of civilisation. And it’s not going to continue progressing in this direction forever for two reasons. One, the law of diminishing returns. And two, we are destroying our stock. So we can’t. We’re going to be in a system decline. The car, the calibre of men that built the society. We can’t even maintain it. We can’t even maintain it.

 

And there’s an elite. They call it elite overproduction. But it’s not. It’s the false elite overproduction. We’ve built a false elite and that’s why these rodents that are all 100, 105 IQ, they got Master’s degrees. They’re absolute midwits! They’re not idiots, but they’re absolute midwits! They are the ones running this into the ground. We have allowed midwits to take over society!

 

And I’m not going to talk about what my IQ is because I don’t think it’s super important, but I think it’s clear that it’s at least one or two standard deviations above average. And we’re having midwits go through university, male and female, and then they’re taking elite positions, but there’s not enough elite positions, so they have to create positions for these other fake elites.

 

And that’s like psychology, for example. You’ve got so many idiots going through university and studying psychology. And so we’ve created a whole industry of government rebates here in Australia and in America you’ve got all this drug prescription and all this mental illness and all this compounding issues of the parasitism of psychology. Psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapists, all of this is a parasite economy. They’re all parasites. They’re all parasites! It’s one giant parasite economy! And the purpose of it is to continue to make the problem worse so that they can have employment. And so they will never, ever be able to solve the problem because a purpose of a system is what it does.

 

So that’s just one element of university that’s caused this over education. We’ve got this over education where if you don’t go to university, you’re a moron. And it’s like we have more engineers and architects than we’ve ever had and our society is uglier and more broken! So it shows you that exclusion is the rule to greatness. You need to be exclusive in order to create hyper specialisation. You can’t just send everyone to university or the vast majority of people to university, and then think:

 

“Oh my God, society is getting so much better!”

 

It’s like, no, we’re running off the inertia of intelligent, hyper selective people. And the show’s about to come to a halt. We have printed so much money! They’re literally printing like $8 trillion, not a trillion, 8 billion dollars a day in the US to keep their bullshit fake economy going. And it’s just leading to the Weimar conditions. And we’re going to pay for all of this. We’re going to pay for all of this.

 

And that’s why you need to be prepared. You need to be prepared. And I’ve gone off topic from Patriarchy, but it all ties together. You can’t cover the subject without covering it all. Obviously. I’ll take a pause and I’ll come back.

 

Someone asked me about the employment question. Yeah. You gotta have skills. Look, you gotta have skills. Home of the brave, says:

 

“Tom, you’re the embodiment of the spiritual healing of the entire European race. Hey, we approach phase one of total re-migration of nons in the West. Segregation. Stay safe!”

 

Nah, I can’t do that on the stream. It’s a good question. I appreciate the question. Maybe I can leave that to the end. I can’t do that at this stage. I have to cover the woman question. Celine says:

 

“As a younger White woman, I’ve had to come to terms with Jesus being brown when I’ve always pictured him as a tall White man. Jesus being brown makes me deny it. Christianity is more of a woman thing.”

 

I don’t necessarily agree with. I don’t know what Jesus looked like. But I’ll tell you a really funny story. I’m not sure if I told this story on stream. Obviously all the Christian identitarians are raging at you now because they’re all saying Jesus was blonde hair, blue eyed, Aryan. I saw a really funny post yesterday or last night where some guy was saying that Jesus was Italian. He was like:

 

“He was born in Judea of the Roman province of Syria. He was therefore Roman. He was therefore Italian. Jesus was Italian!”

 

I just thought it was funny. Obviously he’s not being serious, but I wonder what the implications of everyone saying Jesus was Italian would be. And whether that’s like a bit of an icebreaker. Because it’s like people say Jesus is a jew. Well, the Bible says Jesus is a jew. And then Christian Identitarian said Jesus was like a Nordic Aryan. And then it’d be funny if we just say like:

 

“We meet at halfway and say Jesus was Sicilian or something!”

 

That’ll [chuckling] cause drama, won’t it, that one! But that just would be funny. We’re like, Jesus was White passing. That’s like the compromise. Now I know you people don’t believe in compromise. They want it one way or the other. Maybe that’ll keep the peace for like five minutes. If we just say Jesus was Italian. It’s a theory. What’s the funny story? So someone in the conversation tell me if I’ve said this before on stream. I can’t remember. Some [chuckling] guy replied, “smartest women woman”. Look, I think I’ve only told this story in person. It’s story time. I might have said it once on stream.

 

[1:33:41]

 

So the last time I was in prison last year I was in solitary confinement and I wanted a Bible. Actually, this Bible right here, this one right here. King James. I wanted a King James Bible because I got my other prison Bible. This is the prison Bible I got the first time into prison. It’s the NIV*. Look at that. [chuckling] Presented to Thomas Sewell, Melbourne Assessment Prison. That was in 2021.

 

[* The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.]

 

Anyway. This is now:

 

“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man. Adam and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame.”

 

Genesis 3:16:

 

“To the woman, he said, ‘I will make your pains in childbearing very severe. With painful labour you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you’.”

 

“Then the Lord said to Cain, where is your brother Abel? I don’t know. He replied, am I my brother’s keeper? The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen, your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for. You will be a restless wanderer of the earth.”

 

Yes, well, they got the mark on him. And I really wonder when circumcision started and when the restless wanderers of the earth started getting the anti-semitisms on him. Anyway, that’s just a theory. I won’t go too deep into that or piss people off.

 

But anyway, I got that version and I read it in full.

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow, okay!”

 

I probably should have read this the first time, but I wasn’t ready because you kind of you read the Bible when you’re a kid and you just like, you don’t read it properly, you don’t read it in full. And when you’re in solid confinement, you get a lot of time to read the Bible. And I read the NIV and I was like:

 

“Whoa, okay, this is definitely eye opening.”

 

And everyone’s trying to convert me. And I’m like:

 

“No, I can’t. Like, I just read it. I just read the whole thing. Are you kidding me?”

 

And they were like:

 

“You read the wrong translation.”

 

So then this time I went to prison. I went and got a King James. It didn’t make any difference for me. But I do think the King James is a better Bible. But story time.

 

So how did I get the King James Bible? So when I got to prison this time I got sent to Barwon, which is a much nicer prison. It’s older, but it is better. And because I was in Port Phillip before that. And they wouldn’t give me a Bible, they took my Bible off me. I got another NIV. I got a wait, is that King. No. So that’s a King James. No, they took it off me, sorry. I got that one later I got another NIV and when I got transferred from Melbourne Assessment the second time to the prison, the Barwon prison, they took my NIV off me and I had to fill out a form to get another Bible.

 

And I was like:

 

“Why? Why would you take the Bible off me? I don’t understand. Just let me keep the book.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, it’s not your property. It’s the property of the MAP.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“So you’re going to send the Bible back to the MAP, back to the other prison?”

 

It’s just crazy! But they’re just there to fuck with you. That’s their existence. And they won’t even let a non-Christian man keep his Christian book. And so then I had to fill out a form to get a Bible. And to get a Bible you had to have a meeting with a priest.

 

So if you want a Quran, you could have a meeting with an imam. If you want to. Whatever it is what it is. I don’t know what the Buddhists have. But like there was these boxes you could tick. I ticked the Christian box and I picked the Anglican one because I’m an Anglo Saxon and I’m not a Catholic, I’m not orthodox, and my grandmother was Anglican. None of the men in my family went to church really, but the women did. And they were Anglicans and so, Church of England. So I picked the Anglican box and it took two weeks.

 

And then this guy, I get pulled out of my cell and I get put in like a visitor room and I’m put in there with a priest. And I’ll just check the comments. Have I told this story on stream? Because I won’t go into too much detail if I have. Oh Jesus, so many comments. Have I told this story before? I’ll just tell the story!

 

And so he was like. I asked him:

 

“Why are you Christian?”

 

And he told me a story. The priest, he said that when he was a teenager he was really angry and him and his mates went out to this golf course and they had a BB gun and they shot a bunch of magpies or something. A bird, I can’t remember what type of bird I think was a magpie. Magpies. And he just felt horrible! He just felt horrible about it afterwards. He had a lot of regret and guilt about killing these magpies.

 

[1:40:02]

 

And then, he was raised in a Christian household, in a Christian environment, but he just wouldn’t go to church. And after like leaving the Church for a year or two and kind of hanging out with the wrong kids and you know, doing bad stuff, like shooting magpies with BB guns, as like most 14 year old boys probably would if they had a BB gun, he started noticing the kids walking home from church. They just looked happier. They just looked happier. And he was like:

 

“I wanted that happiness. I wasn’t happy and I wanted that happiness. And so I started going back to church and I asked my priest, when I was 14, I said I want to be happy like the other kids, they’re all happy. Why am I happy? And the priest said to me, you have to surrender yourself to God. You have to be God’s slave. You have to submit yourself. And once you submit yourself, then you’ll be happy. Then you’ll finally find peace. Because you’re fighting God and that’s why you’re unhappy. And you just have to stop fighting. You have to give up! And when you give up and you let go, then you’ll finally be happy.”

 

And he says:

 

“Why do you ask?”

 

And I was like:

 

“So I asked because I’m not Christian, but I ticked the Anglican box because it was the closest thing that I could do. But what I really want is a Bible. So I’ve got something to read in here because they’re torturing me and I’d like a Bible.”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, okay, okay, yeah, but why do you want to know why I’m a Christian?”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m just fascinated. I want to know your story. Like you’re a priest. Like you’re obviously highly motivated to be a Catholic, Anglican priest. You know, I just, I want to learn more about your journey and like how that, how do you become an Anglican priest?”

 

And then we talk a lot more about this subject. And he’s very, he’s very apprehensive. He’s very like on the back foot the whole time, very defensive. And yeah, just the way he explained it to me, I said to him:

 

“You know, do you still have this same attitude? Like, do you still feel this way about God? Is that your relationship with God?”

 

And he said to me, he said:

 

“I wake up every morning, and the first thing I do every morning is I pray to God and I say, God, I am your slave. Let your will be done through me! I am your vessel. I am your slave on this earth!”

 

And I was like:

 

“You do that every morning?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Yep, that’s what I do.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow! That is fascinating!”

 

And he’s like:

 

“It is, isn’t it? And I know that might sound really intense, but it works. It works for me! And I’m so much happier. Life is so much easier this way. It’s just so much easier! Like, I don’t feel what I used to feel. And, look, I still have challenges, and I’m a grandfather now, and da, da, da, da. But life is just so much easier this way!”

 

Okay, [chuckling] what the fuck! Okay. Anyway, an hour goes by, we shake hands, and he goes:

 

“Nice to meet you, Tom. Blah, blah, blah.”

 

And then the second time I meet him, so I ticked the box again. I want to have another conversation. He says to me right at the end, he goes:

 

“Do you want to meet me again? Do you want to talk to me again?”

 

I said:

 

“Absolutely! I really enjoyed this conversation.”

 

“Are you sure?”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I really enjoyed this conversation. I really enjoyed it. I would like to meet you again.”

 

And he said:

 

“Okay, well, what about next week?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Maybe not next week. I need a bit more time to digest this conversation. But maybe give me two weeks.”

 

He said:

 

“Okay, two weeks, Same time, same day.”

 

I’m like:

 

“Excellent!”

 

So this is my only human contact. I’m in a concrete box for two weeks straight. And then I meet up with him again. He walks in and he’s nervous. He’s so nervous! And he says:

 

“Tom, I have to be honest with you. I Googled your name. I thought I recognised you, but I Googled your name, and it was really hard for me to come in today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh! Why is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“Because, … There’s a lot of people in this prison, and they’ve really beautiful people that have done really horrible things. And I’ve never felt like this before where I felt selfish that I didn’t want to come in. But I prayed to God this morning, and I said God, I don’t want to talk to this man. I don’t like this man. I think this man is evil, and I don’t want to speak to him. What should I do? And what God told me was that’s why you have to go speak to him. Because he’s evil. Because he’s evil, you have to go speak to him. That’s why!”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, okay, all right.”

 

And then I said to him:

 

“You ever spoken to a paedophile?”

 

I said:

 

“Have you ever felt that way about a paedophile?”

 

And he was like:

 

“No, no. There are some really beautiful people in this prison. Some really beautiful people in this prison.”

 

“Never felt that way about a paedophile? Okay, interesting! Well, luckily, you are God’s slave, and that God forced you to come in here today to speak to me!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“I want to show you something. I want to show you my God! I want to show you my God!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, you want to show me your God?”

 

“Are you ready? Are you ready for my god?”

 

It’s this weird, passive aggressive, feminine. He’s got tears in his eyes. And he’s like:

 

“Before I do, can I ask you a question? Why did you want to speak with me?”

 

[1:46:16]

 

And I said to him:

 

“Because I told you the truth last time. My grandmother was an Anglican. I’m an Anglo Saxon. I ticked the Anglo box, not the Catholic box. Simple as.”

 

And he was like:

 

“But me specifically, did you know I was the Anglican priest. Me, personally?”

 

And I was like, I think his name was [changed]. And I was like:

 

“Leslie, I don’t know who you are. I just know that you’re an Anglican priest.”

 

He goes:

 

“You don’t know about my past?”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I don’t know. What is your past?”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, I want to tell you a story, Tom. You know, I had to take a stand against, … I mean, there’s a lot of evil men in the world., …”

 

And he’s talking like a lesbian. He speaks like a lesbian, right? He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of, …”

 

Like a feminist. He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of evil men in the world. And Donald Trump comes to mind, and Adolf Hitler comes to mind. And when I was younger, there was a man that came to power in Australia that reminds me of Donald Trump, and his name was John Howard. And when John Howard came to power, he had an immigration minister called Peter Dutton, who you might know, because he was running for prime minister recently. And they imprisoned people in concentration camps on, …”

 

I think it was like, Manus Island or something, one of these islands off the coast of Australia:

 

“And there were these people, these desperate, honest, loving, caring, they were God’s children, and they wanted to come to Australia, and they begged for our help and our safety. And they were refugees, …”

 

And he’s literally crying! He’s literally crying!:

 

“And we locked them and their children in concentration camps on these islands and treated them so horribly! And I had to make a stand, so I went and visited them!”

 

So he goes to the concentration camp and he’s like. [chuckling] He says:

 

“And I like painting. And I met this man, and he was a refugee, …”

 

And I think he was Iranian or Iraqi or something like that. I think Iraqi. And he goes:

 

“And I met this Iraqi man, and his name was Fadim, …”

 

Or some shit! And he goes:

 

“I said to him, you are so beautiful! You are such a beautiful man. Can I paint you? I want to paint you. Will you let me paint you?”

 

And then he said:

 

“Yes, I’ll let you paint me. And then I painted him.”

 

And it’s hot. It’s so weird! He’s holding a, he’s got like a, he’s got the, … Imagine this is the painting of the guy, but he’s got it like this, and he’s holding it on the table, and he’s holding it upside down. And he’s holding upside down on the table, and he’s like:

 

“I want to show you this. And the reason why I want to show you this is because when I was painting him, I looked into his eyes and he was crying. He had tears in his eyes as I was painting him. And I was painting him. And the whole time I was thinking about Jesus on the donkey going into Bethlehem as a refugee, needing safety. And I thought, this man is from that region. This man is from the same region, very similar region, near the Euphrates. And he’s a refugee as well., …”

 

You can predict the whole conversation, can’t you? Like, I’m drawing it out, but I’m drawing it out for effect. This was the tone this guy was taking with me.

 

“And I still remember. And I thought to myself, this is what Jesus would look like, and this is how Jesus would feel if he was here right now with us, seeing what John Howard, behaving in a fascist man manner, putting these innocent people in concentration camps! This is how Jesus would be looking at me. So I painted him. So I painted my God! This is my God, Thomas! This is my God!”

 

And then he shows me a painting of a brown man crying. And he’s like:

 

“This is my God! How do you feel?”

 

A picture of a brown man crying. And I was like:

 

“Fascinating! Fascinating! That’s your God?”

 

He’s like:

 

“I want you to have this. I want you to put this up in your cell.”

 

And I was like:

 

“No, no, I don’t want it. It’s your painting.”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, this is a copy of it. This isn’t the one I painted. This is a copy. I want you to have it. I want you to put this in your cell and I want you to look at my God! And I think that will really help you and I think that’s why I was sent here today to give you this painting.”

 

And I was like:

 

“It’s a decent painting. You’ve done a good job painting it, for sure. This is not my God! This is your God. This is not my God! I can’t put this in my cell. It’s just not my God! Not my God! There are many gods. This one’s not mine. This is your one!”

 

And [chuckling] that was the end of the conversation! And yeah, fuck, I’ve just had too much life experience at this stage! [chuckling]

 

[1:52:11]

 

And when I got out of jail, I’m gonna Google this church that this guy’s from. And it’s like gay flags and trans rights and refugees are welcome and all this shit!

 

And it’s like [chuckling] women pastors! These people, they’re sick! They make me sick! People in the chat saying, Jesus’ Italian. Man. A lot of, lot of Superchats to go through. Jeez. How much more do you want me to go, in a detail about that one? Oh, I don’t know what it is. It’s not dopamine, but it’s some sort of chemical. There’s some chemical in the brain. It’s just surreal! It’s like a surreal chemical. It’s not dopamine. It’s the surrealism of it. It’s the surrealism. Hyper, hyper, what do they call it? Hyper realism. How are these people real? They share this planet with us. What planet are they on?:

 

“I felt really bad for the magpies. That’s why I had to go back to the Church!”

 

Well, yeah, obviously you shouldn’t just like indiscriminately kill animals!

 

But what he was doing at 14 was what all 14 year old boys do, is they’re testing themselves. They’re seeing, can I do it? Can I do it? Can I put meat on the table? Can I put meat on the table?

 

And I said to him:

 

“Are you a vegetarian now?”

 

When he talked about the magpies, I said:

 

“Are you a vegetarian?”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, no, I’m not, but I make sure I thank God every time I have meat. And I thank God for what’s happened to the animal and pray for the animal.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, that’s fair enough. That’s good. I respect that.”

 

I have a lot of respect for that. I think that’s important when you take life and you’re consuming that life. Trans. The transmutation of it. Transubstantiation. Yeah. Like you’re putting meat on the table and you shouldn’t indiscriminately kill, but you’re doing what all teenage boys do when they’re going through puberty is they’re seeing not just if they can do it, but they go over the top. You know what I mean? They go a little, you go a little bit over the top and then you dial it back in. You’re like:

 

“All right, that was unnecessary.”

 

But he’s gone, he’s dialled it back in so much that his God is a brown man crying. That he has to live with White people!:

 

“He has to come live with the White people! He has to! We have to let them in! We have to!”

 

This is what his God wants. So look, obviously if you’re a Christian and you’re watching this, you would be disgusted by that story, that this is the calibre of priests. This is not Patriarchy. This is not the original church. This is not anything like the Greeks or the Romans or the Hebrews or even the jews. This is like the jews don’t even behave this way. This is like sub-Aryan and sub, even sub-Hebrew behaviour. And like ancient Hebrew, if we’re going to call it that. But this is like a completely poisoned chalice and these people are church leaders.

 

And so, yeah, it’s been completely infiltrated by communists. This is the downward path. They’re cherry picking document a book that has a lot in it.

 

As I said, the Bible’s a million things! There’s a million words in it. There’s a lot going on in that book. You can cherry pick whatever you want to articulate something, but what you can’t lie about is the general progression of themes and the general moral structure that the Bible is putting forward.

 

Now, is there, in my opinion, contradictions of the moral structure? I think there are some things that, and I’ve discussed them, I won’t go into them today. But you’ve all heard me say what I think is contradictory in there, within the moral, within the framing of a lot of things. And in short, I don’t like the story of Jacob and Esau. I don’t like that story.

 

Well, I mean, I don’t like the character! I don’t like the individual. And I don’t like the moral of that story. I think it is either miswritten or it’s not correct, it’s not right, it’s not fair, or there’s missing data, something’s missing from it. In my opinion. Like that would be the only way I could describe it as a moral story. Anyway. But the Bible’s full of that, of this kind of fight of morality. And you can see the schism of morality. You can see the schism of an ethnicity or the schism of a people are schisming, which is I guess one of the main themes of the whole text.

 

But if we just come back a little bit and we don’t talk about the Bible and Christianity, we just talk about the theme of Patriarchy, which is beyond just Christianity. I think that’s one thing the pagans and Christians can both agree on, is that we need Patriarchy.

 

And I think the Christian view is that women are inherently prone to an evil influence, just as men are, but that it infects the women first. And you can kind of see that with how giving women the right to vote and the late Enlightenment values of total, absolute human equality led to the suffragettes and led to women voting and led to first wave, second wave, third wave feminism that has come out of that structure. And we can see the damage that that has done to society. Anyone that can’t is obviously an idiot! But we can see the damage that it’s done. And yet women are also capable of fixing the situation. That’s also interesting.

 

As I said before, when I started women, more women voted for Adolf Hitler than men!

 

[1:58:41]

 

 

So that is a very redeeming quality when you realise that. Well, hang on a minute. Why? How could that possibly be? How could that possibly be? And what that might give a little bit of Credence to is this idea that when there is a strong leader, when there is a return of masculinity and a return of Patriarchy, women are actually more inclined to notice it than men. Women are more intuitive to the cure than men are. They’re more sensitive to the disease, but they’re more sensitive to the cure as well.

 

So I had a thought that ran through my head yesterday or the day before, which was, if we don’t contain women or restrain women, who will? Who’s going to? Because what we can see by the decline of the last hundred years of civilisation is we have removed the barriers, all barriers, every barrier possible, and said:

 

“No. Men and women are exactly the same!”

 

And we have done this to the detriment of women. We have not improved their life, and more importantly, we have not improved civilisation, and we have not improved the fucking mission. And the mission isn’t to make women happy. I want to make that very clear. That’s not the mission. It’s not to make men happy either. You know what this guy’s talking about? It’s like he accepted God because he wanted to be happy. That’s what Nietzsche talks about. That’s crazy! Well, it’s not crazy, but it’s like, that’s not why you should accept God. That’s selfish! That’s not the mission. Morale is not your happiness. It’s your willingness to fight. You have to fight for a mission. You have to fight for a purpose, for meaning.

 

And I believe you have to fight for life itself. Life is an upward struggle. And my religion, my personal religion is what my interpretation of Hitler’s religion is, which is that it’s about struggle into victory. And that these things aren’t necessarily steady states or acts of being, but they’re acts of becoming. Struggle is an act of becoming into victory, which is also an act of becoming.

 

So it’s never ending. It never ends. It’s like beyond time because God has to be above time. God can’t be subject to time because then he’s not God. So God is above time. So therefore, struggle and victory have to be conceived as being principles above time. That it’s like infinite struggle for infinite victory. It’s just like a yeah, it’s like you got a hail victory and you got a hail struggle. You got a hell struggle to hail victory! You know, which is a bit. Yeah, a bit different to:

 

“I just wanted to be happy! I just saw all these people around me and they were happy. And I just wanted to be happy. I just wanted to be a good person because I was a bad person!”

 

You know what? Yeah. [chuckling] Very different sense of moral structure and moral framework. So yes, Patriarchy, restraint, it’s about building a world that is driving towards this goal. And the relationship between men and women in that world is one built off respect, not pandering.

 

And so the issue with our society at the moment at a just socio-economic level with 50, 60% divorce rate, with the family courts tearing families apart like all the societal diseases we’ve got, is about, what they all come down to regarding the bad relationships between men and women and is that women have on average more respect for the government and more respect for the system, for the justice system or for the police than they do for their own husband and their own father. That’s the issue!

 

So a system needs to be built by husbands and fathers that form a collective, that form an organisation that are all on the same page with how they’re managing their family. It’s up to them how they manage their family. But they’re all roughly on the same page as to how they manage their family. A nation is a collection of families. It’s not a bunch of gay men masturbating into each other’s assholes and adopting kids. That’s not a nation. That’s just craziness! A nation is a bunch of families. You know, the family is the building block. This is not a meaningless platitude. It is the truth! You cannot have a nation without families. Because a nation is an extension of the family.

 

And so therefore the leader of a nation has to be the extension of the leader of a family. And the leader of the family is the father or the grandfather or the great grandfather, if he’s still alive. Like that is the leader of the family.

 

And that’s how society has always worked. And it’s a sacred, ancient, basically unwritten rule. I mean, we don’t even need to write this down. This is a reality.

 

And anyone that disagrees with that reality is our enemy. Because they disagree with it, because they care more about something else than making our society, our civilisation, our blood, our spirit, our life force, move upwards. They care about something else. They care about some sort of momentary happiness or some sort of:

 

“I want to feel good. I want to get along with everyone.”

 

Like this is their God, this is their God!

 

And so those people shouldn’t be given the same rights as the Patriarchs, as the people that acknowledge that:

 

“Hang on a minute. We’ve tried that. What it leads to is like millions of Indians and Arabs and Africans coming into our country and just like raping and pillaging and destroying it economically, socially, and sometimes unfortunately, physically.”

 

And these consequences are obvious. And we’re going to structure society in a way that this doesn’t happen going forward. So yeah, it’s non-negotiable. I’ll go through the comments and wrap up the stream.

 

[2:05:06]

 

Where are we? Where are we? Celine’s got another question. Just something about I don’t like Christians. Cool. Three story Rory:

 

“G’day, Thomas. What do you think about starting a petition for Joel Davis similar to one for Brandon Koschel? Chances of their release are low, but this activism can rally support and drive attention.”

 

A petition? I don’t understand what a petition is. Yeah, I’m not in the petition business because it doesn’t work. It doesn’t do anything. There’s a petition to deport me to New Zealand with a hundred thousand signatures, and yet here I am in Melbourne, Australia.

 

So look, the way we get Joel out of prison is either he’s released because the Supreme Court has a sense of the law and will enforce the law and the law says that he should be released from prison. And the Supreme Court follow through with that because the magistrates certainly don’t uphold the law. They’re activists. They’re political activists that do what the politicians tell them to do. That’s the only way to get him out of prison. Or we wait for the infinity amount of time he’s got to be in prison.

 

But yeah, sorry, a petition is not going to do anything. It’ll help raise awareness and that’s really the purpose of petitions. But no, I’m not in that business:

 

“Thank you for your sacrifices and bravery. God bless!”

 

Yep, thank you. A lot of comments. A lot of comments. Fanny Schrute says:

 

“Jesus was Italian.”

 

I think that’s the way to go. Someone gives me $100 for the cause:

 

“No need for acknowledgment.”

 

Thanks, mate. Celine’s got another one. Something about KGV, Shakespearean old English language. Stone Mountain:

 

“What are your thoughts on infidelity in women versus infidelity in men? And are our highly successful Chad man with multiple baby mothers a greater good or bad for society?”

 

Oh, that actually brings me to what I was meant to talk about the manosphere and stuff and we just end up talking about Christianity. Yes. That actually brings me to the second half of the stream, and we’ve been going for like two and a half hours. It’s crazy! This is madness, guys!

 

Yes, yes. Look, let me get a glass of milk. Let me get a glass of milk. And I have all these thoughts that I’m gonna put down. Because there’s just been so much chatter about the manosphere and looks maxing and Louis Thoreau’s recent thing. And I made a little post. Obviously most of you have probably already read my post, just explaining, the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read]. These people that are trying to embarrass the manosphere, which is quite easy, clearly. These people are not morally triumphant. These people are equally as bad, if not worse than the manosphere. And don’t get blindsided by this and fall into some trap where you’re going to take moral, what’s it called? Not legalisms, like lectures. Don’t take moral lectures from these freaks! These people are easily as bad, if not worse than the manosphere people. The manosphere people, a lot of them are not good people. I want to make it clear this next segment is not in defense of the manosphere. I’m not saying that. I’ll explain how you should accurately interpret why this phenomenon exists and how it needs to transmute into something much better. I’ll be back. I’ll just close this little thingy. Two minutes.

 

[2:11:12]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[3:41:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/28/2026 = 34)

DJTriumph
Supporter
18 hours ago
the James Mason podcast was great
11
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
FLmetalhead
12 hours ago
Where is it?
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
3
0

Jaymeo1
12 hours ago
Link ?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

eclipseNF
11 hours ago
Where is it?
1
0

baileyspunts
13 hours ago
Man i love when Sewell streams. White pill every time
11
0

LachlanMD
21 hours ago
L foids
6
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
19 hours ago
Nah. W foids
4
3

Jomaha22
20 hours ago
Every time I see that text “manosphere” I cringe. Where did this analogy came from? Ayn Rand male equivalent?
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
im guessing its the “every single time” crowd
2
0

christophawilkins
16 hours ago
hail
4
0

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
great to see another talk mate
3
0

squatmech
18 hours ago
There never anything wrong with the volume wtf is wrong with these people it’s like if you get kicked out of hundred bars but with low volume…
1
0

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
What’s the 5 hour stream where is it?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
eclipseNF
9 hours ago
Thanks a lot

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
whats gonna get too us 1st, terminator or mad max?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Mad Max. These fuel shortages are serious & AI cannot become conscious – it is built from outside-in, life evolves and self-builds from inside-out.

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
ive never heard of any abbos trying to claiming other abbo land that was taken in their tribal warfare, but the land whites took on the other hand will always be theirs??? and dna shows the have only been here for about 5000 years, coming from india and they were not the 1st people in australia, the originals were eaten by them.
1
0

TRUTH1488
11 hours ago
Where can I find that james mason podcast
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
1
0

Tax_Cow
VerifiedSupporter
5 hours ago
Our boomer parents have been hooked on the TV since childhood and they’ve been soaking up jewish propaganda for so long that they aren’t capable of independent thought. Despite whatever their friends and family say, what the TV says is the bottom line. Unwitting agents of our destruction, professing to be enlightened because they watch the talking heads on TV every night.
1
0

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Tom, im glad you still give Abos a chunk of land as their own country. African americans & native americans are similar. Thats the best way. I like wat you are doing but im softer on nons. I feel that at this point we may have to give all nons a chunk of western nations, as their own nation. Set cameras up and make documentaries on how they make a clean 1st world society to a 3rd world shithole. Juxtapose it with our first world living. This way we will document in 4D why we will never live with them again. We would play multiple weekly reality TV shows akin ‘Running Man’ & ‘Hunger Games’. This would change our culture. Then we will make museums to store these films and all the injustices we suffered with/from them. Especially the lil caps. Then maybe in the future we might decide to conquer them & retake the land, and put them where we want, maybe isntreal? Or put these brown masses in africa, or somewhere low on resources, since they cant mine them anyway. Tom, I also think 90%+ whyte is a good target. Because the good ones that help us have a reason to. But once we have control we can create policies to reduce their breeding over time: a white centred society; they will admire us or leave; we will be re-morale-ized; etc. If they dont want to accept it, they can always leave. Caramel island is an alternate choice for them too.
1
0

birdhouse456
15 hours ago
The problem with “where is the aboriginal land” is that their concept of it completely different to ours. We look at different metrics. They can’t just pick up and move their culture because it’s linked to place. If they don’t want to give that up they will be motivated to go to war regardless. Or, they’ll just be squeezed out and fade away, because once they are away from their territory the culture doesn’t function. Now we have a hybrid that succeeds at neither way. Maybe there can be agreement with some tribes but others will disappear completely. it’s similar to the clans of the Scottish Highlands. The culture survives, but it’s not what it was.

BossLurker
9 hours ago
Parasites and retards

BossLurker
9 hours ago
The whole “in the past they weren’t truly conservative they were only going off inertia” is actually an extremely good point

‹ Hide 1 reply
BossLurker
8 hours ago
Around 59:27

leibekohne
5 hours ago
Tom you have some criticism from USA NS bit-chute or odysee. The abos solution is good. I will give them a bare-bush land without any infrastructure, also they have to create own if needed financial system with own currency. This is about purity and recuperation of race thus Australia + has to be 100% white otherwise there will be no progress.Those idiots want to convert abos and save theirs lives but had no problem with murdering 35.000 white Boers woman and children. Cake destroyed Egypt Greek Roman empires by usury and by miscegenation. 1000 year of Romans were destroyed by 100 years of Christianity=Judaism 2.0= children blood drinking sacrificing cannibalism. Germany were destroyed in WW2 by another stupid and manipulated white men who should know better. White international unity.

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
56 minutes ago
Tom, I emotionally agree to boot out all leftists, or white antiwhites. But something for you to consider: Richard Spencer says that whites can build because we have all levels of people Elites, managerial class & working class. Dr Ed Dutton “white race functions like a bee hive”. So we might need to select the better ones and put in breeding policies to get them to their 15% balance. Because nearly all managerial class are leftists.

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
More and more blackpilled every single day
2
3

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
life is struggle mate, learn to laugh in the face of these demons and keep the sprits of our ancestors lovingly in your heart. heil victory
7
0

trvkvlt
2 hours ago
Thomas Sewell is my rabbi
0
1

drshreddie
6 hours ago
you need a better background, the baby blue with the books isnt working. How about a more masculine color with a NSDAP banner? I know this seems trivial but perception is a big deal and your message is important.
0
4

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Dean McIntosh: Hello there, guys. At the risk of sounding like every other YouTuber out there, I’d really appreciate it if you’d click the subscribe button. It’s free, it doesn’t cost you anything and it allows my channel to grow, which means guests like the one you’re about to watch, as well as more, would be willing to come on! Just give it a like, give it a subscribe and we’ll go from there.

 

All right, thank you and enjoy this episode.

 

So today on Laments, I’ve got Mr. Mark Collett. Mark, how are you doing?

 

Mark Collett: Hello, my friend. It’s good to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me on. I’m looking forward to having a decent chat with you.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, thank you.

 

Now, for those that don’t know who you are, if they were to Google you get some quite derogatory terms come up. People call you, I saw “Hitler Simp” when I was doing my research. I think simping is something to do with OnlyFans girls. I don’t know, I’m a bit old for all that shit! The neo-Nazi, Nazi. How would you describe yourself?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I describe myself as an ethno-nationalist. I’ve always described myself as a nationalist.

 

But now there seems to be sort of two camps. You have the sort of civic nationalists and you have the ethno-nationalists. I’m an ethno-nationalist. I am English, I’m proud to be English. And I believe that White Britons, i.e., the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, they deserve a homeland just like any other ethnic group. And my belief is basically that we as a people need to turn around the demographic changes taking place, because I don’t want White Britons to become a minority.

 

And secondly, I want to ensure that Britain is run by the indigenous people for the benefit of the indigenous people. So I want us to remain a super majority in our homeland and I also want our homeland to be run for our benefit rather than for the benefit of people who are foreign or for the benefit of foreign countries.

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, I’m not going to lie. That sounds like it’s right out of the playbook of Restore Britain. Do you know Rupert Lowe?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I mean, Rupert Lowe is now talking my talking points, because I’ve been doing this since 2000. I’m now 45. I’ve been doing this for 26 years. I first got involved in this when I was at university. And it’s very interesting to see that the things that I was de-platformed from X, for the things that I’ve had my bank accounts taken away for, the reasons I’ve been banned from any form of foreign travel are essentially now the policy points of people like Rupert Lowe.

 

So the things that I face such repression for over my lifetime are now the talking points of a sitting MP. And it tells you that there is a massive vibe shift at the moment. What we’re seeing is this unprecedented political change where people are talking about things that at one point were seen as highly taboo. And it was quite a taboo thing.

 

And as I said, I have suffered sort of quite heavily because of my political beliefs. I’ve been doing this, I’ve been consistent in doing this for the past, 26 years.

 

But now these things are breaking into the mainstream. They are being spoken about in Parliament, and obviously Rupert Lowe’s now got 100,000 members who obviously agree with these talking points, which is incredible because obviously I was in the British National Party at the height it had 14 and a half thousand members. We got two MEPs elected to Brussels, but it was nowhere near on the size and scale of what Rupert Lowe’s doing. Now that doesn’t necessarily mean Rupert Lowe’s gonna win a general election, but what it does mean is that there has been a huge change in the way people think and people’s willingness to talk about race, ethnicity and demography.

 

Dean McIntosh: It’s interesting you mentioned that, actually. I had one of your compatriots or previous compatriots, Nick Griffin on a few months ago. And it gives you the vibe shift, as you mention it. I think that scored 10,000 views at my last check and I had lots of people saying:

 

“Yo, you can’t speak to Nick Griffin!”

 

I got a lot of abuse for it as well. And I thought:

 

“You know what, I’m just going to talk to the chap and get his side of things.”

 

Which is why we’re having this conversation as well. I don’t go by other people tell me, as you’ve probably seen, Mark, you’ve seen my channel. I go by going to the source, go to the horse’s mouth sort of situation.

 

So, yeah, you were part of the BNP, which is why I think you get slated as much as you do. Obviously, as we’ve just said, these conversations around race and ethnicity are now breaking through. You’ve got Rupert Lowe, not sort of spearheading that, but he’s definitely picked up the baton and is running with it. His party is doing very well. It’s interesting, really. He talks about re-migration a lot. He talks about millions must go. I know you know Steve Laws and he’s a big fan of or big, big promoter of re-migration. What’s your view of that? Do you think that we should get rid of everyone that isn’t English?

 

[05:05]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I do believe that millions should go, but I have or both myself and the people I work with have always said we would like Britain to be around 95% White British.

 

And if you stated that as a point, I think that’s something that most people who are reasonable could agree with. We’re not saying that every single person who’s got a tiny drop of foreign blood must go, but lots of them do have to go. And we have to bring about a situation where the indigenous people, these islands, are a super majority and a stable super majority.

 

So we don’t want to say 95%. Then in five years it’s 90%, then in another five years it’s 85%. We don’t want to go back down that road. So it would have to be a figure where the indigenous people were an overwhelming majority and that majority was maintained.

 

Now when we’re starting to talk about people being sort of sent home or expelled or remigrated or repatriated, as we used to call it in the BNP, you know, we’ve got to talk about this sensibly. There are 21 million people here in Britain today who are not White British, who are not indigenous or have some kind of mixed race heritage.

 

Now if we were going down the route of mass re-migration or repatriation as we used to call it, there is a sensible way of approaching this. And we’re not talking about putting 21 million people on boats in a single year and getting rid of them. There would be a system of doing this which would be sensible. It would be, it would obviously take people’s needs into account.

 

So the first people you would send back would be illegal migrants. Because really there are three types of people in this country who are not indigenous. There are people who shouldn’t be here because they’re illegal migrants.

 

So you’ve got the illegal migrants, you’ve got Visa overstayers, you’ve got people who have no legal right to be here.

 

Then you’ve got people who’ve got a legal right to be here but are not British citizens. They are people who are citizens of other countries that have gained residency here, work permits, visas. They might be studying. They’re here, but they’re not actually British citizens. Then finally you have the third group, which are people who are here and are not indigenous to these islands, and they have British citizenship.

 

Now, they’re not indigenous, but they have a passport. They have attained citizenship.

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Now, obviously, if you were to bring in, look, if somebody gave you sort of like Marvel superhero powers and you were sort of Thanos and you could just snap your fingers and these people all disappeared, that would be all well and good, but that’s not how it works in the real world. And there’s a lot of people who say, like:

 

“Oh they’ve all got to go! They’ve all got to go!”

 

But you have to put forward a policy that would actually work. And you have to realise that you couldn’t do this overnight. It couldn’t be done with the snap of your fingers. So you deal with the first group first. And the first group were illegal immigrants.

 

Now, day one, they would all have to go. You would have to start rounding them up, and you would have to start deporting them. They are here illegally. They have no right whatsoever to be here. And they have come here, and by the mechanism of coming here, they have broken our laws. And we do not want criminal migrants here. I think that’s a fair point.

 

Dean McIntosh: Are we talking about the ones coming across on the boats and things like that?

 

Mark Collett: Anybody who is here that has broken the law to be here and has broke, whether you are a visa overstayer, whether you are somebody who has entered on a small boat, whether you are somebody that has Stowed away in on a plane or in a lorry on the Channel Tunnel, makes no difference. If you are here illegally and you have broken our laws to enter this country, you go immediately! So you would deal with the first group with a stroke of a pen.

 

Now, the second group are people who are here legally but do not have right to remain because they’re not British citizens. So they do not have a passport. You would deal with them rather swiftly as well. You would wait until any work visas ran out. You would not reissue them. Any of those people who were here and were not British citizens and that were out of work claiming benefits, they would have to go. You know, why on earth we have people here in Britain who are not British citizens, but they are claiming benefits? I don’t know.

 

I mean, I don’t think you or I would be able to turn up in Japan or Nigeria or India and immediately be able to just go to some government office and start getting free money. So you would then ship them out.

 

Then you would look at people who were here through the Visa scheme or here through some temporary measure who had broken the law. Now, anybody that comes into our house and violates our laws and breaks the laws, they will be leaving.

 

And I think that’s a sensible policy as well. And over time, you would drastically reduce the number of foreign nationals living in Britain, starting aggressively with lawbreakers and people who were claiming benefits.

 

And eventually, over a period of time, people would run down their visas. Those visas wouldn’t be reissued, the foreign nationals would leave. And you would make sure there was no birthright citizenship. So even if they had children on British soil, that doesn’t give you the right to remain. And I know that America has gone down that route recently. Donald Trump has attempting to abolish birthright citizenship because people have these, what are known as anchor babies, which allow them to stay. And that would leave you with the third group.

 

So the first two groups, the illegal immigrants and those here legally who are foreign nationals, you would deal with those two groups extremely quickly, and those problems would be solved. And that would leave you with people living here who are not indigenous and who have British passports, essentially British citizens, but not natives.

 

[11:24]

 

Now, they would be dealt with in a number of ways. We could offer them reasonable grants to leave, and at the same time we could pass laws that essentially bring about something that the government keeps crowing about the government always talks about equality, doesn’t it? We always hear about the importance of equality:

 

“We’ve all got to be equal, we’ve all got to be treated equally under the law.”

 

Well, no one gives me 150 pound an hour interpreter to go to the council office. So we’ll treat everyone with a British passport equally. And if they don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to benefits. If their children don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to go into the educational system, they’re not entitled to state education. If you don’t speak English, you are not entitled to an interpreter in hospitals because all of these things are inequalities which put White Britons at a disadvantage. We pay for these things, but we don’t get these benefits. And that overnight would begin to incentivise people with British passports to take the grants to leave.

 

We would ban full face coverings in public. We would ban kosher and halal slaughter and the importation of meat that was slaughtered in a cruel manner. And overnight you would see millions choosing to go home.

 

And we would also look at people who had British citizenship but also had citizenship of other nations. So if there was a Jamaican man, let’s say, and he had both British and Jamaican citizenship and he had raped someone, he would have his British citizenship stripped. And that would be completely legal under international law, because any nation can strip a citizen of their citizenship if they have citizenship of another nation where there is a grey zone under international law. Not that I’m a big fan of international law, but this actually does abide by. It is if you strip somebody of citizenship and they don’t have citizenship of another nation. So you couldn’t strip somebody of British citizenship if they didn’t have a dual citizenship and couldn’t go anywhere else. But there are many people living in Britain who have a British passport but are dual citizens. And dual citizens that have broken the law, committed benefit fraud, have never worked, don’t speak English, they could have their citizenship stripped.

 

And over time, what you would end up with, it might take five years, it might take a decade, I don’t think it’d take much longer. But you would see a dramatic turnaround when it came to demographics. It would create a hostile environment for illegal migrants. It would more or less cut immigration to zero. And you would see a massive number of people leaving. And over five to 10 years, the demographic shifts would be drastically reversed! And you would also stop paying the people who are here and aren’t indigenous to have children.

 

I’ll give you a great example. Labour lifted the benefit, the two child benefit cap. Well, which three ethnic groups in Britain have the largest family size on average? I can tell you straight off the top of my head and list them in order.

 

Number one, Pakistanis, number two, Bangladeshis, number three, Indians. So people who come here from the Indian subcontinent have by far the highest birth rate and the largest family size. Labour are currently paying them to breed by lifting that benefit cap. By lifting that benefit cap, Labour are putting in place a form of indirect discrimination that pays certain migrant communities to have children. There would also be policy reversals like that again, that would see thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions leave simply because that policy was reversed.

 

And once you’ve done that, you would end up with a small number of people here, 5%, who were not White British. They would be fellow Europeans. There would be a limited number of people of mixed race origin who were half English and say half something else, because they can say:

 

“Well, look, I do have partial English heritage or part Scottish heritage.”

 

Whatever, but it would be a manageable number that was maintained and did not start to creep above that 5% threshold. And then it wouldn’t be discriminating against people like a man who, say, has a Polish wife or, somebody who was of mixed European origin, but their family had lived here for sort of 50, 60 years. And I think that would be fair. I think most people would accept that the idea of sending people home doesn’t have to be one of people marching down the street in uniforms, pulling people out of their houses and loading them into sort of lorries at the point of a bayonet. Sensible policy change would turn this around.

 

And if you extend that, an extension of that, is once you understand that sensible policy change could turn this around, you understand that it is policy change, bad policy, that has brought us to this point. A mixture of horrendous government policy which has created both push and pull factors, has incentivised millions of people from overseas to come to these islands because we treat them as first class citizens and we treat the indigenous people at best as Second Class and at worst a hated minority that are preyed upon by the people who arrive here!

 

[17:25]

 

Dean McIntosh: It does seem everything you’ve just said sounds like it could have come from Restore or Advance Britain. It really does. And like you say, it has crept into the discourse. Yet, what, five, ten years ago you were vilified for these views. Now you’re no longer part of BNP. I don’t think Nick Griffin’s part of it anymore. Do you know Simon Tomlin?

 

Mark Collett: You might want to cut this bit out, but Simon Tomlin, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I don’t edit anything. I do not edit anything.

 

Mark Collett: Well, Simon Tomlin’s a strange guy that has all these fanciful stories of, …

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Of what he’s done and where he’s been. He’s written all these sort of strange books. Some that claim he’s an MI5 spy, some that claims he was on the run from MI5. He has these fanciful stories that he was this big player in the British National Party. He wasn’t!

 

In fact, he’s kind of a strange guy. You can look up his criminal history. He was arrested and actually jailed for stalking and harassment of a woman who was in the wider nationalist movement. This can all be found quite easily. He’s not somebody that’s a fan of me. He’s really a Walter Mitty that makes a lot of things up.

 

Dean McIntosh: The reason I ask is obviously he’s got his own podcast. I’m not name dropping anything, but it’s The Daily Agenda, obviously, I’ve seen it. He has mentioned you. I just wanted to know your side.

 

Mark Collett: He mentions everyone. He’s one of these people who is endlessly embroiled in a series of beefs with different people. So he rages about me, he rages about Steve Laws, he rages about Tommy Robinson, he rages about Nigel Farage, he rages about Rupert Lowe, rages about Nick Griffin.

 

Now, I’m not saying all those people like one another. And some of those people don’t. You know, I like Rupert Lowe, I like Steve Laws, I don’t like Tommy Robinson. But he doesn’t like anyone.

 

And if you look into him, you’ll find out that he is a Walter Mitty that lives in sort of this little pocket universe of his own creation. He’s written a load of these really strange books. One of his books claims he has magical powers or something like that. He’s a very strange guy. All of this is on the Internet. You can Google it if you just put in sort of “Simon Tomlin, Eastwood Advertiser”, it comes up with his attempts to sort of get the Eastwood Advertiser to remove headlines about him which relate to his stalking and harassment, which he was jailed for. You know, this guy is not a nice guy. He’s not a good guy. He’s a very strange guy that makes up that he’s had this big sort of impactful career in nationalism. He hasn’t. I never met him when I was in the BNP. He never did anything of note when I was in the BNP, he might have been a member briefly, and he’s fallen out with everybody that you could imagine.

 

So, yeah, he’s not a big fan of me, but he’s not a big fan of anyone.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, that’s fair enough.

 

Now, moving on from the BNP, we talked about Re-migration Now, and Steve Laws. How well is Patriotic Alternative doing? That’s your party, isn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: It’s not a party. We are a community building organisation. We believe in three things, community, advocacy and activism.

 

Now, we attempted to be registered as a political party. The Electoral Commission blocked us numerous times for ridiculous reasons. And we eventually, when Nigel Farage came back into politics. Well, when Nigel Farage came back into politics, we were still trying to become registered as a political party and we weren’t allowed to.

 

So we had an agreement with the English Democrats. We gave them our people who wanted to stand as candidates. We gave them our activists in order to leaflet for them. And we worked with Steve Laws and the English Democrats to field a number of candidates at the general election. Almost as soon as we announced that Nigel Farage came back into politics. This was 2024 at the General election. And at that point it was over before it even started. Nigel Farage is one of those people who is a political juggernaut and his involvement in British politics carries so much weight that the previous Reform Party conference, when it was being run by Richard Tice, had around 300 people present. When Nigel Farage got back involved they were filling the Birmingham MNC, you know, one of the conference centres, the Birmingham MNC. Nigel Farage is such an influential and successful man that if you are going to take on populist Right-wing politics when he is active, you are going to be carving out a tiny, an almost, I can call it embarrassing, really, an embarrassing number of votes. You have this niche because he’s going to take everything else.

 

So at that point, we stopped applying to the Electoral Commission. We said:

 

“Let them get on with politics, let them get on with this battle for Westminster, and we will do what we do best.”

 

And what we do best is community building, advocacy and activism.

 

And what I mean by those three things is community building is we hold meetings with, we hold social events, we hold camps, fitness events, and we build an ethno-nationalist community. We carry out advocacy. Advocacy is where we fight for the rights of our people. We raise money for political prisoners, we write to the Prison Service and advocate for the rights of political prisoners. And we take up cases on behalf of people who are of our ethnic group who need our help. So we advocate for the good of our people, for the rights of our people.

 

And the final part is activism. We also go out on the streets. We’re part of the protest movement. We were recently at the large protest in Warwick and we are going to be holding another one of those protests in Nuneaton at the end of this month on the 28th of March.

 

[23:39]

 

So if you, if any of your viewers would like to attend that, we would absolutely welcome them. I am doing that in conjunction with Steve Laws. There was also the National Front there was also White Vanguard, there was also the British Democrats. Other groups who want to attend are welcome to attend as long as they stick to our code of conduct and agree to behave in a reasonable fashion. Numerous speakers spoke there, myself, Laura Towler, Hugh Anthony, Steve Laws, and we are going to build a powerful ethno-nationalist protest movement.

 

So by doing those three things, community, advocacy and activism. We are building something very different to a political party.

 

Now, that means that when Restore Britain was formed, not that it has been formally registered yet, it wasn’t something I was particularly concerned about. Now, I can imagine a lot of people running micro parties were very upset and probably very depressed at the thought of Rupert Lowe starting a political party.

 

Because if you were running a micro party, the day before Rupert Lowe started his political party, you probably thought you were going to hoover up everything to the right of Reform.

 

However, when Rupert Lowe started his party, he gobbled up everything there. And now, if you are running one of these micro political parties that’s got a hundred, 200, 250 members, you’re not going to eclipse Rupert Lowe. In fact, you’re going to be completely eclipsed by Restore.

 

So the political ground now on what you could say the populist Right, has been completely gobbled up by Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe. We, on the other hand, are going to keep doing the things we do. There is no other group in Britain that takes the approach we take. We are very open to working with other groups. The Woodlander Initiative, Remigration Now. We work with people like David Clews from Unity News Network, and we build, and are happy to build a coalition of groups that want to work together for the good of our people.

 

So we’re very open to unity. We’re not trying to carve out some little niche for themselves and get involved in these sort of bun fights that you see a lot of these micro parties involved in. And by basically being unshackled from the electoral process, it allows us to do the things that are important. And it also means that if we feel passionately about something, we can pursue that without having to say:

 

“Well, look, general public, we need you to vote for us. So we have to sell this thing that you probably won’t understand or agree with or believe in, to you.”

 

We’re not really bothered if the wider public doesn’t support some of the things we do. If the wider public doesn’t support our prisoner support program, well, so be it. We don’t have to sell it to them because we’re not going down the electoral route.

 

And a lot of these micro parties are constantly trying to sell things to the British public that they don’t understand or can’t get their head around properly. And then they get 1.2% of the vote. And it’s all been a big waste of everyone’s time and money. And we simply don’t want to go down that route.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, Fair enough.

 

So there’s a big sort of ethnic push from your side of things. I get that vibe. We’ve had a chat about it for nearly half an hour. I understand that. So what about people that aren’t ethnic nationals who say yours, Steve Law’s ideas, contribute to hostility or division of the British society at large?

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s a really, … Well, how can I say this politely? That’s a stupid point to make! And it’s a stupid point to make because the British people were not divided until mass immigration took place.

 

The greatest division between the British people when we were an island nation made up of England, Scotland and Wales was when we played rugby against each other or football against each other. You know, as a young man growing up in Britain, when England played Scotland, it was a big event. When Paul Gascoigne, you know, ran down the middle of the pitch and scored that absolute screamer of a goal. You know, the English cheered and laughed and the Scots cried. And that was the division in Britain.

 

The divisions in Britain now are much greater. And they haven’t been created by White Britons or by ethno-nationalists. They’ve been created by politicians who have brought other ethnic groups here that are so different to us. There is no hope of these people fitting in. They have created a multi-ethnic sectarian society and that has been created by design! That is not the fault of people like me who speak the truth! It is not the fault of indigenous Britons who by and large have always been against that level of mass immigration and that sort of immigration. And there are different types of immigration. But mass immigration from the developing and Third world has been something that the vast majority of White Britons have always opposed in one form or another.

 

The fault for all of this lies at the feet of the politicians who have done this without our consent, against our wishes, and have created this sort of ethnic or racial tinderbox which is now causing so many problems!

 

And when I say that, I’m not just talking about White on non-White. There are multiple different ethnic lines which create divisions. Hindus don’t like Muslims. Shiites don’t like Sunnies. There are different black gangs that murder each other on a daily basis because they come from different postcodes or have slightly different ethnicities and ethnic loyalties. We don’t want any of that here! Britain should not be a battleground for all these different ethnic groups. It should be our homeland. It is our homeland and it should be a place where we feel safe to go about our daily business and raise our children!

 

[30:00]

 

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, that’s a very interesting point because when I was born in 86, so when I was a younger chap, Whites weren’t Whites. And I say that as a broad term. You know, White, Europeans, English, whichever term you want to use, were the majority.

 

And it seems like things have got progressively worse now. People would say it’s migration. People say it’s the small boats. You could point a finger in many different ways. But what I want to get to is a different point entirely. Going back to my earlier point, doing my research on you before I reached out, obviously they call you all these names and they tied you all these different things.

 

So what’s your view on Israel? Now the reason I ask that is because they charge you with being a Nazi, obviously. See where I’m going with this conversation? But Israel, from what I can gather through my research is, and through people I’ve spoke to out there, is an ethno-religious state where everyone, I assume, everyone is Israeli, jewish. Obviously you’ve got different sects of Judaism in there, but for the most part, Israel is supposed to be like a safe zone, a safe country for jews, regardless of what type of jew you are. It seems funny how Tommy is saying that the Israelis should have a state of their own, an ethno-state, an ethno-religious state, but not the UK. And that we’re like almost like a Brazilian style melting pot. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but be honest.

 

So what’s your view on the Israel side of things? Because it seems like everyone’s okay with that, but when it’s the UK wanting an ethno-state, then it’s wrong.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, this is the greatest hypocrisy of our time. Powerful jews who live in Britain and wield vastly disproportionate power. They’re a tiny percentage of the UK population, but they wield vastly disproportionate power in terms of the number of seats in Parliament, in terms of their influence over Parliament, and the way that they distort both our domestic and foreign policy. These jews wield huge amounts of power. But not only do they wield huge amounts of power, but they do so in a way which is fundamentally not only to our detriment, but also hypocritical.

 

So people who support Israel, especially powerful jews the British Board of Deputies and the little lap dogs, like little Zionist lap dogs like Tommy Robinson, they will tell you all day and all night that Israel deserves to be an ethno-state, that Israel is a place for the jews, that the jews have a right to a homeland, that they have a right to a homeland which they can defend, where they can control their own borders, that they shouldn’t be taking refugees, that they should be able to do what they want to their neighbours. Some people that Tommy Robinson has just met, the disgusting fat blob in America called Randy. Fine. He will tell you that in fact Israel has the right to starve the Gazan children. Disgusting! But these same people will tell you that actually White Britons do not have the right to be a super majority. That we don’t have the right to our own ethno-state, that the English do not have a right to a homeland, that we should share our homeland with everyone else.

 

So the British Board of Deputies will say:

 

“Yes, Israel has a right to defend itself! The British government should defend Israel, we should send money there, we should sell them weapons, we should allow them to do what they want in defense of their ethno-state.”

 

But then when somebody says:

 

“Well look, there’s tens of thousands of illegal migrants coming into Britain every year raping White girls, attacking young men, claiming huge amounts of benefits, living in hotels, huge amounts of taxpayers money.”

 

I think it’s about £8 million a day is spent housing these people in hotels. The British Board of Deputies will turn around and say:

 

“Don’t be so racist! Refugees welcome!”

 

Why? Why is it that these people who support Israel, who support an ethno-state for jews and wield this huge amount of power, are all completely behind a place for jews, but don’t think the English have the same right? That’s a massive hypocrisy.

 

And Tommy Robinson is a scumbag! Tommy Robinson is a guy who will fly around the world campaigning for the rights of jews. But if you ask him, should the English remain a majority in England, he will reel off 101 reasons why black people should come here, Indians should come here. He was outside the Iranian embassy the other day making clips about how he would allow more Iranians to come here because they’re good people, they don’t create problems. Why? Why do we have to be the nation that opens its borders, welcomes everyone in, hands everything to them on a plate, and then watches our own people become a minority, and a hated minority at that, whilst jews get to do the very opposite? And why are the people that advocate for open borders here the same people that advocate for closed borders and an ethno-state in the Middle East? This hypocrisy needs to be called out.

 

And this is why I’m banned on X. It’s why I can’t get a bank account. It’s why I can’t travel to places like America. And it’s why Tommy is making millions of pounds a year! It’s why he travels everywhere. It’s why he’s got the freedom to do whatever he wants. It’s why he’s spending £455 on a T-shirt and £5,000 on a pair of shoes. It’s why his son is traveling around as an influencer on private jets. It’s because if you bow to these powerful jews and you advocate for Israel, you will be paid for doing. So you will be given freedom, you’ll be given the right to do as you please.

 

Whereas if you say:

 

“Hey, there’s some hypocrisy is going on here, you will lose everything like I have.”

 

[36:13]

 

Dean McIntosh: So you called out what you saw as a double standard and, …

 

Mark Collett: Massive double standard! Yeah.

 

Dean McIntosh: And they smeared you as a Nazi and you’ve been de-banked. What countries are you not allowed to go to? You said there was more than one.

 

Mark Collett: 29 European countries plus a complete ban from North America.

 

Dean McIntosh: Just for calling out, calling it how you see this!

 

Mark Collett: For speaking about two things. Speaking about demography, and who controls Britain. Those two things. I speak primarily about demography and I talk about the disproportionate power that Zionists wield in the West. Those are the two things I talk about.

 

And if you look at what’s going on in the world or what has gone on in the world over the last few years, I can tell you this unequivocally, there is no other nation on the planet who would be allowed to indiscriminately slaughter women and children in multiple different countries, kill foreign leaders, starve refugees, and attempt to drive millions of people out of their homes without international condemnation, sanctions, and even military action being taken against them. But Israel can do all of those things, and all we do is send them more money!

 

Dean McIntosh: Right, Okay, I didn’t know any of that. So that’s all a learning point.

 

Mark Collett: You must know that! I mean, look, come on, you’re an educated guy. You must know what’s been going on in Gaza. Look, I don’t want Palestinians here in Britain. I want Britain to be for us, but also I don’t want to see Palestinian children being slaughtered. I don’t want to see aid workers being strafed by Israeli jets, which has happened. You know, how many foreign nations or how many nations on the planet would get away with killing aid workers, delivering medical aid, food and water to women and children and it just be brushed under the carpet?

 

You can Google all these things. Israel is essentially a country that has subverted Western domestic and foreign policy to the point that they have the complete ability to do as they please, even to commit genocide, which the UN has determined that they have done. The UN has determined they have committed genocide in Gaza. Yet America, Britain and numerous other countries are still dancing to their tune and nothing will happen about it.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, so that all to one side. I’ll just put a pin in that for a moment. Do you think, two points to this question. Do you think that the jews should have a homeland, a jewish state of their own? And second point is a lot of people that have come out as ethno-nationalists and Catholics and Christians recently have said that they are Zionists, that they believe that Israel should have a right to exist regardless who lives there, I think it would still exist, personally, but like as it is so do you think this is people just toeing the line and Israel should be there or shouldn’t be there in its current form?

 

Mark Collett: I will say this, and I’ll start this with an interesting point. I have said today at the beginning of this, you asked me sort of about re-migration. I laid out what I believe to be a very sensible, humane and lawful way about ensuring Britain remained ethnically homogeneous and a stable ethno-state. None of that was illegal. None of that was a call for violence.

 

Yet for saying those things, you can be de-platformed. You can have Prevent at your door. You can have the police looking at your social media accounts and potentially arresting you, you can be de-banked. You can have a travel ban put upon you. Okay, for just saying what I said earlier, which I think were pretty reasonable points.

 

Now you have Israel killing children, starving refugees, assassinating foreign leaders, destabilising sovereign nations, arming terrorist groups like Al Nusra Front in Syria, which are just the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda. You know, if you believe that Al Qaeda were the ones that blew up the twin towers on 9/11, why is Israel funding them and arming them and giving them air cover? Because that’s what they’ve been doing. Now I believe that all people all over the world deserve an ethno-state, okay? They deserve their own place in the world.

 

And I’m not saying that jews do not deserve a place in the world. But what I’m saying is, why do powerful jews use their power in the West to silence people like me for saying something reasonable, like I said earlier. Yet they support a state in the Middle East which is committing genocide and war crimes.

 

Now, this is the thing, isn’t it? And what I’m putting to you today is not that jews don’t deserve a place to live. What I’m putting to you today is that jews are creating an ethno-state for themselves whilst denying that right to people of European descent. People like us the English, the Scottish, the Welsh. And isn’t it funny that every single time Israel strikes a foreign nation, Israel was heavily involved in the war in Iraq. Not on the ground, but in the preparations. And this all came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. Tony Blair said that he did meet, you know, leading Israelis who helped America and Britain not with information about important military sites in Iraq, but with making the decision to attack Iraq illegally.

 

[42:11]

 

Now, Israel has destabilised Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and now Iran. They do all this. But where does the flood of refugees and displaced people go when Israel commits these actions or prompts the West to commit those actions? They all come here! So wars for Israel in the Middle East, which help Israel grow, ensures Israel’s power and position in the region, only create floods of human traffic that come into the West. And we pay for it twice! We often pay for Israel’s military excursions. We often carry out their dirty work. And then there is always blowback. And the blowback is huge amounts of people leaving the Middle East and we face the blowback. How’s that a thing? How’s that fair? How does this keep happening?

 

Well, it keeps happening because powerful jews in Britain silence people like me who speak the truth about this. And they pay people like Tommy Robinson pay them handsomely. Tens of thousands, hundreds of thousand, millions of pounds a year. They build up their social media accounts, they fly them all over the world so that it appears that the populist Right in Britain, who should be enraged about what’s going on right now in the Middle East and should be saying:

 

“Whoa! Whoa! We need to back away from this!”

 

We shouldn’t be supporting Israel. We don’t want hundreds of thousands of Iranians coming to Europe.

 

But instead, Tommy Robinson stood outside the Iranian embassy saying:

 

“Oh, no, no, we should let them in! This is great! We’ve got to support Israel!”

 

This is all part of the Greater Israel plot or scheme or plan to create a powerful state for jews in the Middle East. But at the same time, what does it do? It reduces every other sovereign nation to either flames and destruction in the Middle East or here in the West. It reduces them to multicultural states.

 

And once we become multicultural states, once we lack in-group preference, once we are riven with division, our nations, our countries collapse. And it leaves one country in the world towering above everyone else! And that one country is Israel.

 

I don’t want to be ruled by Israel. I don’t want to be ruled by Zionists. I want England to be ruled by Englishmen for English men! And I don’t want to see Western nations belittle more than military puppets for a Zionist regime that cares nothing about White people!

 

Dean McIntosh: That almost sounds like the, what was it? The melting pot, Kalergi Plan?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s what it is.

 

Dean McIntosh: And for those that don’t know, they should go have a look at it. Something about every nation becoming a well, no ethno-states anymore, essentially, wasn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: But yeah, but there is one. That’s the point. So powerful jews in the West campaign for multiculturalism in every Western nation. They pass laws that discriminate and silence, discriminate against and silence ethno-nationalists. They support mass immigration, they support all kinds of policy Reform and social changes that reduce White birth rates. But they do the very opposite in Israel.

 

So there is only going to be one group of people in the world who have a homogeneous, powerful ethnocentric state! It’s not going to be us.

 

Dean McIntosh: So why do you think they’re pushing this?

 

Mark Collett: I think it’s pretty obvious from what I’m saying. They covet power and they want to be the, … They understand that power comes through ethnocentrism. That power comes from understanding in-group preference and understanding that if you have in-group preference and you stand together as a group when everyone else is either divided, atomized or pursuing individualism, your group will be the most powerful.

 

So let’s say you have a room full of a hundred people, 100 people. Now, if there’s a group of 20 amongst that hundred who work together and look after each other and act as a group and always have each other’s backs, no matter what, numerically they are still a minority. They only make up 20% of those in the room. But if the 80% are all bitterly divided and act only as individuals, the 20% can dominate the others. Now imagine that on a global scale, every nation is at war with itself, riven with division. Every nation is, or all White people pursue this individualism. Then ethnic groups come to Western nations and it all gets divided. They all become multi-ethnic sectarian societies where people compete for resources, they compete for money, they compete for a better slice of the pie for their particular group. So they’re all divided.

 

But in the Middle East, there is this one nation that acts for itself, that acts for the good of its people to make sure that it is the pre-eminent state in the region. They have this huge amount of power by sticking together. And we just don’t have that. And largely we don’t have that because policies that the jewish diaspora, both social and legal policies that the jewish diaspora was pushed for in the West, has left us atomized and isolated. You know, our family units have been broken down. People pursue materialism. Rather than wanting to have children. We are all looking after ourselves. We’re all looking after, you know, short term our desire for short term pleasure.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

[48:46]

 

Mark Collett: And if anyone doubts me, right, I think we’d all agree, everyone watching this is probably going to agree that the feminist agenda has been damaging to the family unit in the West.

 

The idea that women should, rather than embrace a man, they should compete with a man and attempt to do sort of male centric tasks to prove that women can do everything. And in doing that, they certainly shouldn’t marry a man or settle down or have children with a man, because that would undermine their individualism, their strength and their ability to show men that they can do it all on their own! Well, who’s pushed feminism? Just go on Wikipedia and type in list of jewish feminists. It’s pages long! Pages! Who brought about feminism? Who’s pushing pornography? Who owns OnlyFans? Look who owns it? Who owns Pornhub? It’s a rabbi! It’s a rabbi!

 

Dean McIntosh: Is it really? I didn’t know that.

 

Mark Collett: Who is pushing all of these things upon our people? Who owns the media? There are charts out there that list all the people. Who writes the books about, “White privilege”? Who are the professors in university that are teaching young White people to hate themselves and to rebel against their ancestors and despise their history?

 

Now, I’m not saying it’s all jews, and I’m not saying it’s only jews that do this. But jews are vastly over-represented in the kind of activities that I’m talking about. And are often people who play roles in these activities that could be described, they could be described as “instigators“. They are people that play central roles in getting movements started that are ultimately detrimental to our long term survival.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay. That’s a lot of food for thought, to be honest. But I just want to bring it back to the point about Western nations being divided. I’ve seen more and more of it as I’ve got older, and I’m 40 this year. And it was never this bad.

 

I mean, yeah, you’d have like the occasional, we all knew some twat who was a bit of a racist or someone who’d make a gay, … There was always someone who had a gay joke or whatever. And I remember, I think we peaked in the 90s where nobody gave a fuck!:

 

“Okay, you’re gay. Oh, I don’t agree. You don’t agree. Whatever. People don’t agree. But okay, that’s your business. Oh, you watch porn, that’s your business. Oh, you’re black, you’re Muslim, it’s your business!”

 

All of a sudden. I’ve seen over the past, call it 15 years, there’s this massive sort of merge of everything being a problem now. Where do you think that has come from?

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s come fundamentally from hate crime laws. It’s come from a huge shift to essentially cencored speech. I mean, what’s wrong with making jokes about gay people? What’s wrong with making jokes about anyone? Because you sure as hell can make jokes about White people! You can make jokes about straight White people, White families, you can make jokes about Christians, so why can’t you make jokes about Muslims? If you make jokes about straight people, why not about gay people? If you can make jokes about White people, why not about black people?

 

The fact is, the policing of our speech has been something that has accelerated drastically, both in terms of legislation through the government and in terms of the way the media have weaponised the idea that if you say something that’s unpopular, you should be hounded, you should be banned off social media, you should lose your job, and you should face social repercussions which are so strong that it leaves people sat in their houses feeling as if they can’t speak their mind and bottling everything up.

 

Now, look if you happen to be gay, which I don’t think you are, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I’m married! [chuckling] To a woman. To a woman!

 

Mark Collett: But if you’re gay and you want to do that in your bedroom, it’s up to you. Right? But why do we have to have grown men walking down the street in bondage gear, performing sex acts on each other on a Saturday in broad daylight in the middle of August, in front of families going out shopping. Why has it gone?

 

Dean McIntosh: Actually, it was the podcaster, Andrew Gold. I met him last year at the Battle of Ideas in London. He actually said, I’m sure it was him. He was at a Pride march, just good to see what it’s like. And he saw two men doing that in the middle of the day.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, but why do we have to see that? What you see, this is an interesting thing, isn’t it? Why has it become normalised? Why have the people in power made it normal for two gay men to perform sex acts on each other in broad daylight at a festival and then termed it “Pride”?

 

Well, again, it’s an attack on the family unit, it’s an attack on decency, it’s an attack on morality, and it’s attack on children.

 

And ultimately, that last point is more prescient than ever, because you can see what they’re doing to our children. It’s constant sexualisation, abuse, trying to get children to accept things which are absolutely sick and twisted!

 

And a lot of this then is all wrapped up in careful marketing. The word “pride, rainbows, love is love”. Well, is any of this good for us? Does any of this make life better for regular folk? Is any of this actually helping? Because they would talk about safeguarding, don’t they, safeguarding children, whilst a Drag Queen is reading to them. And the Drag Queen’s associated with another Drag Queen who’s committed sex offences against children and then goes on to die after having sex with a dog! You know, those are the sort of people that these people say, “love is love”, want your children to be exposed to. And women take this, because one of the core British values, we’re told, is “tolerance”. Well, I say that tolerance is not a virtue, it’s a sickness! It’s a sickness that has been pushed upon us. And many Western people now are afflicted with that sickness.

 

And we need to purge that sickness, and we need to be less tolerant. Because, remember, tolerance isn’t a good thing. You tolerate something that you don’t fundamentally like. You take a walk to the shops and you tolerate the stone in your shoe because you’re thinking:

 

“Well, it’s going to be a short journey and it’s raining, so I don’t really want to stop and take my shoe off and get the stone out.”

 

[55:28]

 

But the stone’s hurting your foot. You tolerate things that you don’t like or that harm you, and you tolerate them to your detriment until you can tolerate them no further.

 

Why is it a virtue to tolerate things that harm you and your family? It’s a virtue because the people in power have twisted everything and turned it against us. Even our core values that now apparently underpin our society are actually evils that do anything but underpin our society.

 

They destroy traditional British society! They destroy any last ethnocentric pockets around the country in order to leave White Britons as isolated, atomized individuals who are then prey to ethnocentric groups brought here from overseas who are handed everything on a plate and often learn to hate us when they arrive here. Because as soon as they get off the boat the first thing they’re probably given is a nice hotel room and some money. But if they start doing some watching of the television or some reading of the books, they’ll soon learn about how the White man is evil, how British people oppressed everyone, how we’re basically demons in human skin that have this great privilege and have been keeping them down for not just decades, but for centuries, maybe even millennia! What is this? Well, it’s a system of not just replacing us, but it’s a system of turning us into a hated minority who are preyed upon by those brought here to replace us.

 

Dean McIntosh: And that’s a very sort of deep point as well. I know we’re sort of getting pressed for time. We’ve got about 15 minutes left. I know you, …

 

Mark Collett: Look, this is why people like Andrew Gold won’t debate me. There’s people like Andrew Gold and Liam Tufts and Tommy Robinson, fundamentally cowardly people. They would never debate somebody like me because I can actually answer what they are saying. I can actually put these points over in a relatively articulate and engaging way. And it’s why I’m so heavily banned. I’m not banned because I’m making ridiculous points. If I was making ridiculous points and I was some kind of racist caricature, I would be on X and I’d be boosted to the moon, because then everyone would laugh at me and say:

 

“Look, this guy is ethno-nationalism. That’s why we don’t want to be ethno-nationalists!”

 

So they get rid of people like me, and then you have people on X who do things in such a clownish way. They’re getting millions of views, but they look like complete idiots and they embarrass our cause. They’ll turn up and do street stalls with two or three people dressed in what looks like a Hitler cosplay outfit. They’re allowed on X and they will get millions of views for doing that because people are laughing at them.

 

No one’s gonna let me go on X and get millions of views because what I’m saying is relatable. And when people do upload clips of me on X, like Jake Shields recently did, they go viral, you know, hundreds, thousands or millions of people see them and go:

 

“Why isn’t this guy on X? I agree with everything he said. How is it I’ve not heard of him?”

 

You’ve not heard of me because I’m basically the most banned man in Europe because what I say makes sense! And anyone that fact checks it the points I’ve made about IDF planes killing civilians and killing aid workers, they’ll find out it’s all true! And then they’ll be like:

 

“Well, why didn’t I know about this?”

 

Well they didn’t know about it because there is an aggressive agenda in place to keep the truth from you.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

So what does the future look like? If we could fix things, what would the future look like if, say, I’m a Harry Potter wizard and you’re Prime Minister tomorrow, Mark, what are you going to do to fix the country?

 

Mark Collett: Well, like I said the first thing you do is you’d stop immigration. You would then start a system of repatriation or re-migration. As I said, and I laid it out earlier, you would put in place lessons in schools which taught White Britons to be proud of the great things that their ancestors did. Why is it wrong to have national pride? Why is it right to teach White kids that their ancestors were evil slave owners, when in fact Britain was the one country that on a global level opposed slavery and essentially brought it to an end? So if slavery is the big evil, why aren’t our kids taught, well, you’re actually the descendants of people who ended slavery! That’s what the British Empire did!

 

Dean McIntosh: It did. Yeah, yeah.

 

[59:55]

 

Mark Collett: Instead we’re told:

 

“Oh, your ancestors were White. White people own slaves! You know, self flagellate a little more, White man, hate yourself a little more!”

 

These are simple policies that could turn things around. Repeal the ridiculous hate crime laws, tear down the facial recognition systems, put an end to digital ID, enshrine things like jury trials, have free speech for everyone in Britain, build an ethno-state, a high trust, high IQ, ethno-state for indigenous Britons, where our children are safe to play in the street, where men and women feel safe to voice their opinion when something’s going wrong. Build a country where you have a representative democracy that really represents the people!

 

Why is it a taboo to point out that democracy, which is another one of these apparent “British values”, doesn’t work? How many people are there in Parliament that actually represent our views? 2, 3 out of 650 seats? We just want a better world, and we don’t just want it for White Britons. If you said to me:

 

“Mark, what about other people?”

 

Well, yeah, I want the same for the Japanese. I want the same for the Indians. Let India be an ethno-state! Let Afghanistan be ruled by the Afghans! I was against the war in Afghanistan. If Afghans want to live under the rule of the Taliban, as long as they don’t threaten their neighbours or us, let them. If the Japanese want to live proud, ethnocentric Japanese men and women that honour their ancestors, just let them. Let everyone control their own destiny, live within their own areas. We can trade. We can visit each other. There’s no reason why we can’t have the Olympic Games or the World Cup. We can even learn from each other, if we wish to.

 

But the fact is, good fences make good neighbours! Every group of people, every ethnic group, has their place in the world. But why should it be on the same street here in England? It shouldn’t! You know, Japanese people in Japan, Nigerians in Nigeria. Why should they all be on the same street in England competing against each other for a slice of the pie?

 

Dean McIntosh: Mark, that’s a brilliant, brilliant end to this episode. Thank you ever so much for your time today.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! If people want to hear more from me, check me out on Rumble, check me out on Telegram, check me out on Gab. I mean, all those good places. I produce regular content like this.

 

And if you do give me a sub, I will be very grateful. Thank you so much!

 

Dean McIntosh: I’ll put all the links down below in the description.

 

 

[1:02:09]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/22/2026 = 484)

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Brilliant guest.
In group preference is completely normal around the World. Mankind is tribal. White people are finding this out the hard way.
123

@DMLaments
5 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Can’t argue with a word he’s said. All very reasonable.
88

@Keribou109
2 weeks ago
Thank you for having Mark on
69

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you for watching
11

Hide replies

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Britain, England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland.
63

@HopyHop1
10 days ago
Ireland has the same problem.
5

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
I think Britain is England, Scotland and Wales while the United Kingdom includes Northern Island,
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
most of our ancestors were HUMBLE POOR FARMERS. NOT rich slave owners!
48

@Lakers-u2v
2 weeks ago
Exactly! I hate when you have people like ian wright constantly go on about whote this and white that. It’s our country!! Dont tell else what we have been. Get out of you dont like us.
9

Hide replies

@Benjamin-j5t5u
2 weeks ago (edited)
Mark is a true Patriot who loves his country and it’s people. What is wrong with that. Restore Britain
82

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Maximum of 38 months to next election yet Rupert hasn’t even registered his party.
I can’t decide whether Lowe has been tricked by the establishment to dilute Reform’s vote, or if he just hates Farage so damn much he’s willing to risk another eight years of left wing destruction.
2

@evolassunglasses4673
7 days ago
​ @Veyron1967 Reform have on solutions. Its better we start building something new NOW
2

@manchesterlass600
3 days ago
@Veyron1967 untrue – the application is in and just waiting for approval by The Electoral Commission

Hide replies

@JacksonFairweather
2 weeks ago
Good to see Mark Collett back on Youtube. He has been banned by every platform possible, and deserves to be heard.
68

Hide replies

@PatriotViolet
2 weeks ago
Wow your guest has put into words my every thought
51

@LegendofLovecraft-b7r
6 days ago
Hail Collet!
7

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Mark Collet has ball of fucking steel and deserves ALLL of the respect and ALLLL of the love. We as british people have the duty to protect this man
6

@ayupmeduck5708
5 days ago
Fluent use of the English language is a must, no exceptions.
6

@kevinsavage808
2 weeks ago
Best interview from Mark for a long time. Allowed to speak and answer good questions put to him. Good Interviewer….
48

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly
14

@paulsmith8858
12 days ago (edited)
No, he didn’t challenge him on anything!!!

@kevinsavage808
12 days ago
​@paulsmith8858he didn’t need to, all true, you can’t argue with the truth
9

Hide replies

@Gudha_Ismintis
2 weeks ago
the ‘Frankfurt School’ has a lot to answer for
65

@Wjfiswjei183
2 weeks ago
Oy vey!
26

@nationalist9904
2 weeks ago
Very true, Professor Kevin MacDonald goes over Frankfurt school and others in Culture of Critique. Essential reading to understand how we’ve been subverted
12

Hide replies

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
He’s always on point and a very compelling speaker. It’s plain to see why they make life so hard for him.
72

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
He said AIDS was a kind disease because it targeted gay men and drug users.
3

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Kind AND based then?
13

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
You don’t have to agree with homosexuality, but being that cruel and callous is terrible optics. Most normal people in the developed world are repelled by cruelty.

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Get over yourself, Princess. There are bigger problems afoot.
7

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
@Costa_del_Artlepool I forgot we only have the capacity to deal with one problem at a time.
Room temperature IQ.
1

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 The big problem tends to throw your lot off roofs.
5

@EnglishFemale
13 days ago
​@johnlondon5516 be careful you don’t snap your string of pearls
3

Hide replies

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
Great guest. Mark is the real deal as far as I’m concerned. I hardly ever find anything I can disagree with him on.
37

@Occident.
2 weeks ago (edited)
He’s consistent. I shared a stage with him in Darlington back in 2002. He was a young dude, but delivered a great speech. His position has not shifted. He has stuck to his views. Good on him.
19

Hide replies

@tonyaughney8945
12 days ago
Great interview. Mark is a top man.
9

@ScepticalWoman
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is the acceptable face of the views
expressed here. This gentleman was ahead of his time. That time has now come.
17

@shanetomlinson4604
5 days ago
Powell wasn’t listened to, Griffin wasn’t listened to, Lowe is our last chance
2

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
Mark hit the nail on the head though and pointed out that anyone ‘on the right’ espousing Zionist views
, is usually a snake in the grass. I’ve yet to see what Lowe is all about when it comes to Israel.
1

Hide replies

@ThisIsJamesL
2 weeks ago
Proud to have Mark as my friend
13

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
When you know you know.
33

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
I know.
6

Hide replies

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
Great to see Mark getting his say ,talks total sense
10

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
Top man is Mark!
40

@shaunhalliwell7544
2 weeks ago
Been consistent in his views.
7

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
@shaunhalliwell7544 Been consistent in his grifting too. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

Hide replies

@geraldfisher5683
2 weeks ago
Very good interview. Mark talks a lot of sense. We urgently need a policy of Remigration. It is the only way to get our country back.
15

@carpetsonline3718
2 weeks ago
” is this good for Jews” as they break out in a cold sweat….
17

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
First time Mark has been interviewed by Orson Welles.
29

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Compliment of the day! Makes a change not being called Temu Carl Benjamin
16

@arslongavitabrevis5136
5 hours ago
@DMLaments face-green-smilingface-green-smilingface-green-smiling

Hide replies

@WolvesRugeley
5 days ago
Very interesting interview
3

@fishtherapy100
13 days ago
THIS IS COMMON SENSE. COMMON SENSE HAS BEEN CRIMINALISED. THIS WAS A BOG STANDARD VIEW IN THE 1970’S. I HAVE NOT CHANGED MY STANCE AT ALL.
6

@AJC298
2 weeks ago
Really good interview that. I have a lot of time for Mark and have read his book.
19

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you
5

Hide replies

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
They want to bring back Babylon and rule over it
5

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Dude was born when I graduated highschool. I’ve watched all of this happen since the 80s. Every year it’s worse and worse
5

@BritishNaturalist-vb8hj
9 days ago
Mark makes a lot of sense & only describes the way this Country was during my childhood growing up in the fifties & the sixties.Our leaders have completely betrayed us.
4

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Great Video Paul with the truth.
17

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Everything the BNP predicted, particularly Jonathan Bowden is coming true.
They had a much better understanding of the long-term trajectory of Liberal Capitalism / The Global American Empire/ Z0G than the centre Right.
64

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Met that great man twice in the N/E. Blucher Village in 2006, and Jarrow in 2008. Brillient Orator Smashing fellow.
13

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
​@Occident.A brilliant orator.
1

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
In politics timing is everything.
8

Hide replies

@Dim3nsion_78
2 weeks ago
Labour have repeatedly stated it has been left with a £22bn blackhole in its finances. Yet continues to spend billions on hotels and welfare for migrants. The government could easily cut its expenditure and reduce the debt – but it hasnt. This isnt incompetence, they want the migrants here.
23

Hide replies

@ColtPython22
12 days ago
It’s refreshing to see an interviewer who lets their guest speak without interrupting.
7

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Thank you kindly
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
Schools LIE . Schools LIE to children. Schools NO LONGER teach the Truth and Facts.
31

@PaulD330
2 weeks ago
He’s just a nationalist, eth nat is a made up term.
44

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
To be a Nationalist, was to be an Ethno Nationalist. It literally went without saying. However since the controlled opposition Tommy Robinson and others appeared, with their brand if multi-racial (fake) Nationalism, the term “Civic” was coined to describe that movement. Hence we have the two. “Ethno” and “Civic”. Only the former is real Nationalism. The latter is a half measure, a cowardly cop out doomed to failure.
18

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
It’s been coined due to the likes of Tommy or Farage civ nat aka fake nationalists so it helps to distinguish who’s on the side of the indigenous white population that being ethno nationalists
4

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
​ @PpHT9217
Dud you see Robinson and his “Not White” quote. I find that very troubling. And Spanish resident, Paul Thorpe, is exactly the same. All calling for Unity on their terms. Suspicious agenda.
4

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @mesolithicman164 you only need to follow the money who his handlers are ,Steven is a puppet for Jewish Israel interests, he does not care one bit about the indigenous white populations in Europe becoming a minority
4

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
Since Blair’s time, we’ve been sold the idea that to be British is to hold a passport and sign up (officially, at least) to ‘liberal’ values, not ethnicity. That’s why we need to disringuish between ‘Ethno’ and ‘Civic’ Nationalism. I say this as a man with a Chinese wife, and two mixed race sons. She is a British citizen, and a good one, but she wouldn’t dream of claiming to ethnically English or British.
2

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
No. 2 things.
1

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Tolerance is Not an English or Christian value! There is no such thing as British values, that term was coined by Tony Blair!
15

@RosemarieMaders
6 days ago
This person speaks the absolute truth
2

@Ann-u5k5n
10 days ago
The English Constitution is the solution for us all
3

@SerenaJB3
2 weeks ago
Mark is a great person and a true patriot.
20

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
And a grifter. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

@PpHT9217
11 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 he takes those super chats to live , like to see how you get on being completely de banked
3

Hide replies

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
We’d prefer not to be rubbed out thank you very much
26

@filled_soda
8 days ago
This comment section fills me with hope.
3

@EnglishFemale
2 weeks ago
If they silence you it’s because you speak truth .
6

@lowbrow
2 weeks ago
Agree with every single word
45

@Stanley_1215
7 days ago
And thats why they’ve silenced him and won’t debate him. He eloquently speaks researchable facts!
I’m ashamed of not caring about politics until the referendum. I’m ashamed i fell for tommy 10 sheckles. I’m ashamed i fell for the smear campains against this man.
I’m glad I have the humility to admit it.
A lot of gen Xers like myself were too busy living hedonistic lifestyles to see beyond the bottom of a bear glass.
Thanks for having the courage that other podcastsers lack. I love anyone who can laugh at themselves Orson Wells I saw your reply
Subbed
6

@DMLaments
7 days ago
Welcome to Laments
1

Hide replies

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
This sounds like what Rupert Lowe has planned.
Restore Britain
33

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
Yes but this is proper..
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
And he’s not far right. He’s just right.
29

1 reply

@julianmorris9951
12 days ago
Hypothetically, if you’re a black man in the absolute middle of nowhere on your last legs and suddenly see three groups of say 50 men, one group is white the other Pakistani and the third group is black, who do you walk towards?????, you would 100% walk towards your own ethnicity and there’s nothing wrong with that
8

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Look at what their talmude says and kaballah
6

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Fucking incredible to see Mark Collet! Love Mark! Saw the interview with russel brand from 2002 and was woken the fuck up!
3

@andreroswell1561
2 weeks ago
Great interview.
14

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you, much appreciated
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
there are also those with citizenship that came here illegally and are now legal; these must go as well
22

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
If you were born in the 70’s you would have a very different opinion as you would have seen a total collapse of English society!!!
13

@ShamanKyrick
12 days ago
I was born in ’90 and can say the exact same
2

Hide replies

@ClintBeastBud
12 days ago
The guy speaks complete sense and truth fair play to him.
4

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Just found your channel, it poped up in my feed.
The youtube algorithms are working well atm, finding lots of decent channels talking sense.
Great interview
17

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly, more interviews due to be released
7

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
​ @DMLaments I have notifications set for your channel so look forward to more discussions.
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
​ @djsioux2265 thank you. There’s a lot more coming, various topics and people
2

Hide replies

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago
The natives can’t afford having large families also no housing to even think about having large families,somehow our replacements seem to have no problem in the UK doing those things with extra help from governments past and present.
18

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
All part of the deliberate replacement policy. One bunch behind it.
11

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@Occident.We node
1

Hide replies

@filled_soda
8 days ago (edited)
I literally just finished Dutton’s review of Naziboy. This popped up afterwards.
Mark’s a legend.
3

@jagi1484
13 days ago
I don’t understand the world has gone mad. All this is two men having a sensible conversation.
3

@BasedSaxon
12 days ago
Always liked Mark
9

@nadimovitch9237
5 days ago
Let’s see if Rupert kisses the wall.
2

@WingBroJoseph
2 weeks ago
EthNats for the win!
29

@myt110
2 weeks ago
Aim high, vote Lowe
7

@NotOnMyWatch-i8n
13 days ago
Does this mean I can’t move to Florida and get given a free house and some cash? Damn! I was relying on that.
6

@johngammon963
2 weeks ago
This is true
14

@waxingmiracle
2 weeks ago
Good chat and discussion thanks.
7

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Paul, we live and learn, we hope.
6

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
That’s the problem. Everyone has turned a blind eye
2

@endrominastercermilenio642
2 weeks ago (edited)
We are a huge problem in our democracy when people like the guest today, Mark Collet, are cancelled.
I can’t argue against anything that he said. And I am an immigrant that he would like to repatriate!
9

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
He was cancelled a while ago, as well as debanked and is barred from majority of Europe
1

Hide replies

@lisalisalake
2 weeks ago
don’t ignore the absolutely connected and dangerous biblical/religious aspect to all of this…the imposition of noahide law in every nation… jewish sharia if you will…
10

@gabemore1766
7 days ago
It’s a genocide
6

@stuka80
2 weeks ago
man i remember mark colet from years ago. dude disappeared for yearse. im happy to see him again.
4

@stephenparker5241
2 weeks ago
Nationalist are ethnats, but they try to portray them as white supremacists which as far as I can see this isn’t the case
8

@smithjones9130
13 days ago (edited)
It must be frustrating for Mark. 20 plus years he’s been banging this drum & now the overton window has shifted far enough to make his talking points mostly acceptable, he can’t because he’s banned from everywhere.
7

@kirstypalmer33
12 days ago
MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO ME
2

@sparticale1954
5 days ago
36%, 25%, 16%. Better to be an Ethno-Natinolist than the victim of Ethno-Genocide.
1

@cimmerian_savage9736
5 days ago
If caring about the survival of your own race is tribalism, then tribalism is simply the natural, default behavior of any organism that exists in populations rather than as isolated atoms.
A Nation body of people having a common descent, history, culture, or language but without a separate or politically independent territory.
2

@bigjawontour9679
2 weeks ago
Mark came out of the English working class and knows his stuff. One of the only men in the UK who has ALWAYS stuck to his principles.
11

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
Money doesn’t buy you class

@Heimbach1966
13 days ago
He’s not working class. That’s why he’s never had any real traction
PA is just middle class people.
1

@bigjawontour9679
8 days ago
​ @Heimbach1966 after a quick search on wikipedia, I stand corrected. From a middle class town and privately educated. PA do know what is going on rather than being paid up zio shills imo.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@Heimbach1966 Who cares what class he is – Tommy Robinson claims he is “working class,” yet is stinking rich by most standards, shrills for Israel and grifts money of his gullible supporters.
6

Hide replies

@robhunt-watts8908
5 days ago
I liked & subscribed because I too am an English ethnonationalist.
1

@robertlestylo6085
2 weeks ago
Excellent interview. My contribution: the Paradox of Tolerance (Karl Popper – Austrian philosoper). To those unfamiliar: Look it up.
5

@teaattiffanys
2 days ago
Absolutely and we have to be proud of who we are . And thats not another state of Islam we will be another Iran unless we vote Restore Britain. No other party will put the indigenous first
2

@Martine-c3t
2 weeks ago (edited)
So me being a kind English white lady gets called more names as an adult then I did as a child but maybe that’s because as a child everyone looked like me I always wondered why god put us in our own countries?? Could it be because we don’t really get on with each other or does saying that make me a racist?new subscriber
28

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Spot on I hear you as a boomer, we didnt have these issues back in the days!
9

Hide replies

@wobwub8188
12 days ago
Take the first two minutes, how do you disagree or argue with that?! I can’t.
4

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
As Mark says – it is PATriotic Alternative. PATriotic (British English) – PATEriotic (American English). When did so many of us come to speak American and why? (Fine, of course, for the Americans.)
2

@CaroleHoward-g6p
13 days ago
Thanks for the video very informative
5

@Pumpemup
2 weeks ago
I agree with everything this man said
15

@TheArtofTheBrave
2 weeks ago
Mark talks a lot of sense, especially his closing remarks. the stumbling block is that certain people would find it impossible to parasitize the populations of western ethno-states, and they will, and do do all they can to prevent that……..
6

@eyemallears2647
13 days ago
This is crazy. How am I struggling to find fault in any of his points???
7

@piercerockwell2588
12 days ago
Why are you trying to go against an Englishman that wants England to be White? What’s wrong with you
3

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Because it’s impossible to find fault with the truth.
2

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
There are no faults!!! Hes spot on with all of it bravo
1

Hide replies

@venx4733
2 days ago
Simon Tomlin is not a Walter Mitty , he is the real deal ….he’s always been a Nationalist….
1

@winstonsmithstaxi
2 weeks ago (edited)
I used to disagree with PA on repatriation and ethic identity stopping non Brits from standing for public office. I have now changed my mind. I will add that while we should try to make change politically, we need to be realistic and accept that a conflict is inevitable
26

@ryan-audax
13 days ago
You think a civil conflict in the UK is inevitable?

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Took your time getting there
Followed you for years buddy, hope the family are well.

Hide replies

@stephenwellstriggers
2 days ago
Mark is a legend
1

@YJB8CCFC
6 days ago
All the hatred and divide is being caused by Western Governments and the Jewish state of Israel. The Jews and the west want total control of the Middle East for its oil rich reserves. It’s causing upheaval to the people there, causing waves of migration to the west. That’s the big issue. If we(The west) and Israel didn’t interfere in Middle East politics, they’d all still be there. And this has been going on since WW2
3

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Yep everything and all our countries have been bought and paid for by them.
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Britsh society. Wtf is that. Currently its based on invasion. Who would want to uphold that.
7

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
The thing that really gets my goat is the lack of any Christian traditions in schools. Lack of respect for Christians in schools. My son being told to hide his cross ,whilst a dominant religion is rammed down their throats constantly,even colouring in geometric patterns handed out to the children are labelled islamic patterns?!?!? well,to me they looked like stained glass window,Church patterns!
21

@johnfused8281
13 days ago
We aren’t a Christian country. We are a pagan country. What does christianity have to do with Britain?
5

@auntsally5683
9 days ago
@johnfused8281 a lot if you look into it, crusades, the national flag, christian names, the law………it is fused with pagan traditions as well.
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
makes sense to be an ethnonat
3

@keithswood6205
12 days ago
Good interview and not one unreasonable point. The host was good and I recommend he follows up on the points Mark made about some of the key actors behind every single subversive movement of the last century. Its worldview shaping stuff.
4

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Its on my “to do” list
Thank you kindly for watching

Hide replies

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
I absolutely agree with everything that dear English gentleman Mark Collett has said in this stream, thank you @DMLaments for interviewing him. I am highly educated and have done mass research and know what Mark is saying is true. God bless you and every native British.
28

Hide replies

@DaveRhine-h4g
2 weeks ago
Wow! At about 37:31 the host declares that he doesn’t know about Israel getting away with the genocide of Gaza in sight of the whole world. At this point in time how could you not be aware of that?
10

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Genocide in Gaza??!!

@DMLaments
13 days ago
I dont follow Israeli news
3

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
@DMLaments Its world news my guy, it’s all interconnected. The way of Palestine will be the way of the world.

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Surely he’s just a “Nationalist”?
This term “Ethno” is pure gaslighting and deflection!
16

@danielarcher1459
2 weeks ago
Mark is brilliant, thank you.
4

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money. Brilliant at grifting.

@danielarcher1459
13 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 I have been invited to those events too and before you make the payment it states very clearly ‘All sales are final and non-refundable’. Perhaps if you spent as much time advocating for our people as Mark does and less time gossiping you would command more respect, but you come across as petty and deconstructive to the cause.
2

Hide replies

@arslongavitabrevis5136
6 hours ago (edited)
Excellent interview. Mark Collett is a true patriot. He put up with a lot of abuse and harassment, like Laura Towler and Sam Meliá, but carried on fighting. I wish him and PA all the best. Simon Tomlin is a despicable creature who has been abusing and slandering Mark, Laura Towler and many other honourable nationalists. According to him, he is the ONLY decent, true nationalist. He is either a psychopath or a troll working for the government.

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago (edited)
Why would any country feed the ones who attack them,Egypt, Jordan also shared a border with Palestine,but they also closed their borders to Palestine.arabs are not native to those parts either.
7

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
I love this guy!!! This is what Jesus was preaching. Jesus Christ is King and I can’t wait till He is ruling the entire earth again. Come soon Lord
6

@psychodrilla
23 hours ago
Ruperts plan will never happen – the half past twos have bought and paid for all this. Ask Barbara Lerner Spectre!
1

@trance.vault.official
5 days ago
Simon tomlin is a true nationalist look him up
2

@paulmorrisrotga77
11 days ago
Great video, subscribed and here is a comment.
3

@DMLaments
11 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@Alma-q6m
13 days ago
It is immigration policies. It is immigration policies. Restrict and limit the state. Embrace the free market system. The ingenuity of the Brits is amazing. Get back to the community. Civil disobedience, where you refuse to pay taxes that are working against you.
1

@TheGreatWhiteLight
2 weeks ago
So the right has been completely gobbled up by Tories
6

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago (edited)
That was the Tory job, keep the Right out of power. So no room for people like Enoch. Now Farage is tge last attempt to corale the RW vote, but he’s failing. Reform is dropping like a stone.
And Restore is on the way up.
So it needs to keep fools like Ben Habib and Robinson out of the party.
12

Hide replies

@Rusty-Hinge
13 days ago
Came for the Collett interview, left because of the advert volume.
2

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If not for Isreal, the world’s opinion of Hitler and co would be very different.
There are many reports of people welcoming the Germans into their countries. The victors of war write the history books.
22

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Sometimes it takes 100 years to really appreciate the work of a Painter.
11

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago

@Occident.And sometimes it takes no time at all

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago
How did that work out for them?

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
​ @Freyjawitch well how’s it working out for us ?
6

Hide replies

@domestinger8805
2 weeks ago
nationalist = ethnonationalist
you have fallen for the language trick
16

6 replies

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Brilliant guest – I agree with everything Mark says. However I have to say that I find it a very strange interview style from the host – he asks a question for a second time – eg “what would you do on you do on your first day as PM” when Mark has already answered that at length.
2

@DS-it9ef
2 days ago
If we ban halal they will start stealing and slaughtering our farmers cattle and continue to kill our wildlife
2

@DMLaments
1 day ago
So you’d let it continue?
1

@DS-it9ef
10 hours ago
​ @DMLaments no, we need to be more serious with our tactics. They only respect strength. They think politeness and kindness is a weakness. That’s why they have been taking advantage of us for decades

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Power
2

@JaneBarlow-z7y
2 weeks ago
Im not being snotty, but instead of guests why dont you Brits submit FOIA requests to all the city/ town councils in England, Wales, Scotland? Put the heat on them. Make them produce their records, finances, expenditures. And then do this for agencies, govt offices, etc. Talking does nothing. We do this here in America. Its YOUR country and money.
11

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
Depends on what you request as to whether or not you’ll recieve the information. If you request information that is ‘sensitive’ they just send you a message saying ‘not in the public interest’ and that’s the end of it, we’re being blocked at every turn.
10

@NoNeed2No
2 weeks ago
Lewis Brackpool has been really good on this, he’s a citizen journalist who makes frequent FOIA requests.
6

Hide replies

@raymondwoods2304
12 days ago
Restore will not harm Reform as Reform is merging with the Uniparty (so leaving the Right/Centre for Restore). Reform is harming Reform because Reform is engineered to fail.

@INCOMING-UK
1 day ago (edited)
Israeli’s are leaving the promised land by boat, they are heading for European countries to claim asylum.
How many are Farage, lowe, Robinson and the flag shaggers willing to take into their homes. Are you going to give them mobile phones, cars and cash ?
Will Rupert and Nigel welcome their votes ?

@Michealst1
1 day ago (edited)
All seems simply basic stuff……Vote Restore….VVOVV Mark has it all vvorked out sounds real good to me.

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
Has Labour government England London tighten up asylum seekers yes it old Thatcher conservative governments immigration policy Thomas it Home office they forced into by England. .
1

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
It’s kaballah
2

@dandoc5160
2 weeks ago
every 5 minutes there’s an advert ffs
9

Hide replies

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
Brilliant great interview Mark speaks so much sense..If most the normies could watch this especially the Israel bit it would change so many minds…No wonder the Jews hate him
Great interviewer too letting him speak, asking great awkward questions no one else seems to ask..Great stuff….
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Thank you kindly
More to come..

Hide replies

@paulreader7353
9 days ago
You missed a group there
1

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
You going to hustings Glasgow Anniesland yes April 14 6.30 to 8 o’clock . Brilliant content. Edinburgh parliament yes 34 politicians lose their seats jobs. Reform uk party that gained politically. Third place in Scotland politically.

@parade1996
6 days ago
Mark collett the state asset.
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Evidence?

Hide replies

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If I click the subscribe button it will unsubscribe me!
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thats odd

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments He’s saying he’s already a subscriber. Please turn your brain on.
3

Hide replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin doesn’t hate everyone he likes Dean Neil, the traditionalbricklayer. Mark also has a dislike for nick Griffin. Not taking sides, I like both of them.
4

@dd7521
13 days ago
He seems to hate most though.
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Tomlin only likes Dean Neil – so that’s just ONE person – everyone else he hates – Laws, Collett , Lowe etc etc. He has even started having a go at young Charlie Downes and Connor Tomlinson who is not even a spokesman for Restore. When I first came across Tomlin on YT he seemed good but his constant punching right is getting so obsessive and repetitive that I can no longer watch him. Tomlin clearly imagines that he should be the great leader of the right – maybe the fact that he can’t get on with anyone would have something to do with it! Mark by contrast has forged alliances with a number of people on the Right and he is not the only one to be critical of Griffin’s leadership style so he is not alone in that.
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 He offers a paid subscription to “remigration action” which entails people handing out leaflets on remigration…truly a mastermind of politics. Let’s not forget his little plot to takeover the BNP by flooding it with members which went NOWHERE, and was doomed to fail.
2

Show more replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
11 days ago
​@MayeDaye01to be fair Connor went to israel, I wonder if he kissed the wall? Lowe has also said in a x post a year or so ago that we must defend israel. Im wary of a lot of these people.
2

@Purp00000
12 days ago (edited)
I went off him a while back and I was there since probably his first video, every accusation he dishes out is more like an admission…not to mention his fake “hunted by the police stories” which just exist to make him sound more edgy and interesting. Not to mention his “I have secret information that will come out soon” regarding Nick Tenconi which was just a free to view searchlight article on Nick’s sex life…Genuine, pure, grade A bullshitter. Oh yeah, I still have a screenshot of a comment he deleted where someone criticised his merch for being made in the third world.
1

Hide replies

@gman0068
13 days ago
57:57 who was that

@John-d5y2d
6 days ago
99.9%

@parjau4554
6 days ago
Re: “Jews” wanting all the immigration. Admittedly, this is sort of true but the reality is these are just left wing, mostly atheist, liberals who happen to be born Jewish. Actual Jews do NOT want that!! For a very good reason.
The most important thing for real Jews is Israel. And right now, Israel generally has the support of powerful, armed Western Nations. But mass immigration to the West is mostly coming from Muslim countries which means that the demographics are changing such that in a few years, there will be many Muslims in society and in power. And this huge number of Muslims will influence these Western countries to do what? TO TURN AGAINST ISRAEL. And without Western support, Israel will be bombed out of existence! So, No. Real Jews do NOT want mass immigration!
And BTW, Israel is not a Jewish ethno-state in the way you said. It is 20% Muslim. And these Arab Muslims are full Israeli Citizens.

@puddlestoo1
14 hours ago
I don’t get it. Why would Israel not want any western nation to be an ethno state? With many slowly becoming Islamic states where does that benefit Israel? I would say it does the opposite as their enemy (Islam) would now have acquired nuclear weapons! Makes no sense.

@jamestower4473
2 weeks ago
The opposite is happening
1

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Which part?
2

Hide replies

@tancreddehauteville764
13 days ago
The only issue I have with Rupert Lowe is that he gives the impression of being a gin soaked golf club Tory. He needs a decent, ordinary guy, with a good brain, from a lower middle class or upper working class background to work alongside him and push some of the economic policies to the left, in order to attract white working class voters, especially women. We cannot win without women’ support.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
millions of working class people voted for boris johnson over the socialist “down to earth” corbyn
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Working class people don’t care about what class you are if they like your policies – they all flocked to Farage back in the day didn’t they! By all accounts Downes and Pitt are more economically to the left than Lowe as a lot of zoomers are anyway so that solves that one.
1

@DebbiejBurgess
12 days ago
Lowe is a fraud

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Yeah I don’t wanna spend the afternoon with him but I want him to restore Britain. Your point is insinuating people aren’t intelligent enough to vote for the policies he’s offering.

Hide replies

@matthewbazeley2984
4 days ago (edited)
Britain had no division before mass immigration?? Don’t make laugh. The class system is incredibly prejudiced and it’s the elite that gave us mass immigration.
1

@Natalya.57.Volkova
2 days ago
And that is how you dilute relevant discussions allowing enemies to change the subject and win, congratulations
1

@matthewbazeley2984
2 days ago
And that is how you throw toys out of the pram. Maybe take a nap?
If facts and accuracy allow your enemies to win then you are not on the side of truth

Hide replies

@DuruttiVisca
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is a Zionist so not a nationalist
4

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
I haven’t heard him say that but I did ask him if there was any Zionist financial backing of restore and got no answer
4

@Lothnar5070
6 days ago
Making up crap without evidence is weak. Maybe you can also accuse Santa claus with the same bullshit?
1

Hide replies

@ianoliver3779
10 hours ago
too many adverts on this channel.

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
What about an english man with an asian wife?

@Robin-Chats
2 weeks ago
RUPERT LOWES Restore Britain will make it easier for foreign spouses to come here.. it’s a policy he’s talked about.
7

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @Robin-Chats Is it?

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@DJAA21M it’s always about me me it’s , our island and our Eth are being at risk of gn cdcd and you say what about my Asian wiffe
6

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB Yea you got a problem with that, I have a right to know?

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB I agree with Mark Collett and Rupert Lowe, I am against globalism, I am a nationalist in that I think all nations should be sovereign and embrace their culture, I wouldn’t go to my wife’s country expecting them to adapt to me or expect their way of life declining and their race being replaced, my wife doesn’t expect that here, she was happy to see the union jacks and george crosses being put up everywhere but you have to understand my family is my priority so I need to know about that before I support something, otherwise that would be irresponsible of me wouldn’t it, you clearly don’t give a sh!t about the many people in my situation so get off your high horse
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
I think what Tracy means is there are no organized grape gangs from the Philippines or Thailand or Japan operating in the UK, but there is obviously a problem with organized grape g@ngs operating all around the UK from other Asian “communities” that are so protected by the state we cannot even mention the ethnicity of said groups but here is a clue it starts with Pak and ends with stani
1

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z I agree with that but I want to know is my family safe in Mark Collett’s or Rupert Lowe’s vision of Britain?
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
That’s what divorce courts are for
13

@francesaquatech3696
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z
5

Hide replies

@Purp00000
12 days ago
All you need to know about Collet is that he recommended Mein Kampf as a must book to read in an interview.
2

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
My struggle in German. Your point is?
6

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 I don’t really care if you think you have any relation to Germany, I don’t have a particular point here to make..I simply wish to inform people.

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​@Purp00000
Your totally irrelevant in my world also.
5

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 The contents of Mein Kampf and the context of why Collet reccomended it is also irrelevant it seems.

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
​@Purp00000 Seems like you got ratiod on a centrist channel.. The people are starting to break their shakles.

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
Would you have an opinion on The Communist Manifesto? Genuinely curious
3

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​ @DMLaments
Why should I?

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Lion-Roar1it shows the mindset of a Marxist

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments The Communists are wrong because historical materialism outside of a few select and specific class analysis situations is utterly stupid and inapplicable. It assumes that if you restructure economic relations, human nature will obediently follow. I can’t really give you a whole analysis but that in particular stuck with me. Should you read it? Maybe, I read it to better understand Marxism which I am opposed to.
1

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
​@Purp00000I’ve read both books, just for the record.
I understand Hitlers book getting the flack it does but I dont think it should be banned, or not talked about etc
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments Me too I agree, books should not be banned. But it’s not like he recommended this book for the purpose of historical insight. He does it because he is a Neo-Nazi – and make of that what you will. I just wish he would stop the deception and just say what he is. That type of thing makes me dislike someone. Dishonesty in politics is never good.

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Purp00000when was politics last honest?
3

Hide replies

@Row1and
9 days ago
mark the mi5 agent
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
Evidence?
1

Hide replies

@MagicEZvil
2 weeks ago
He has not called out Nigel Farage for the Grifter he is. Not to be trusted. HIs words do not match the reality of the Reform Policy – ‘Say what is popular to get into power’.
2

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Somehow, I dont think Mark is part of Reform UK..
4

Hide replies

@anniestephenson6296
9 days ago
Oh , please return the wealth that’s been stolen for the last 400yrs .

@VincentComet-l8e
2 weeks ago
Surely, rather than aiming at non-British people, shouldn’t the criteria be whether they have skills we need, will work productively, and also have a Western mindset and want to integrate into our way of life?
1

@dd7521
13 days ago
5% would cover that.
5

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
The bottom line is we need to be at least 95% in order to maintain ourselves as a majority. The emphasis will be on training our own. If we do need some foreigners with very high skills in the interim then they will be included in the 5%. The “integration” fairy tale clearly hasn’t worked and people need to be weaned off that story.
5

@VincentComet-l8e
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Yes, I certainly agree that we have to do whatever is needed, in order to maintain ourselves as the clear majority demographic…

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
What about teaching the needed skills within our education system by making said system work in our favour rather than political indoctrination tripe? Then in a fairly short time the skills needed would be more home grown. Is that not reasonable?
1

@VincentComet-l8e
2 days ago
@julieobrien8252
Of course, home grown talent is far preferable.
But our ‘education’ system is far from perfect and/or functional.
And firmly captured by the Left.

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
​ @VincentComet-l8e let’s hope the education system is reclaimed to fulfill its proper purpose for the long term prosperity of England.

Hide replies

@g.a.m.b.i
7 days ago
Marks not english, the plum
is Italian buahahahaha
1

@JohnCollins1981
2 weeks ago
Maybe there is a compromise on this?

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
There is no middle ground,we either get the demographic replacement to stop or we die out that’s your choice
4

Hide replies

@Mazen7600
12 days ago
Mark, you have all my respect and admiration!! You always say the things that I think about
1

@jackdoe4632
2 weeks ago (edited)
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago (edited)
Tomlin is always reciting fairy stories about everyone – so I wouldn’t believe what he says.
As for the donation you mentioned – the events do not have entrance fees – so if someone donates to help set up and organise the event and then doesn’t attend it is not like they bought a ticket – ie the money has been donated for and spent setting up the event so why should it be refunded? Tommy Robinson for example asks for donations to help with setting up his rallies – I doubt if anyone would get the donation back if they asked as the donation is to help with setting it up not attending.
2

@jackdoe4632
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 Except that at the time it was not conducted in this manner.

@MayeDaye01
11 days ago
@jackdoe4632 You are being very vague -there are really only two types of events in politics – as I said marches and rallies which don’t have entrance fees or tickets anyway so as I said if people donate to help with setting it up they can’t expect to get a refund just because they don’t attend and if it was actually something in the style of a party conference then tickets like that are never refundable – if you can’t attend a Tory conference or Reform conference or whatever you would not be refunded.

@jackdoe4632
11 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Mark Collet is on record as saying his is an entirely different genre of politics to mainstream parties.
However, according to what you are saying, there is common ground between him and them when it comes to money eh?
Take note I use the word money and not “donations” because there is a wide gulf, fixed, between the two.
He has cheated far too many fellow nationalists. Far too many times he has treated them with contempt where money is concerned as well as backstabbing one who passed away but he’s not alone in that.
At least now, it’s out in the open. Exactly where he doesn’t want it to be.

Hide replies

@franitfcful
2 days ago (edited)
There’s also Palestinians living in Israel approx 2.1 million research it ! As for knocking Tommy Robinson when you can muster 2 million people behind you then come back to us …when you spend most of your life including solitary confinement in prison for speaking up then best you stop the hate towards him .I hope this man can walk down the street safely without fear of being killed like Tommy faces every day of his life

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Was with this guy until he said Israel was an ethno-state – it has two million Arab Palestinians living and working there. Or that it never gets sanctioned – it is the most sanctioned nation on the face of the earth – mostly by the 56 Muslim countries in the UN known as the OIC.
Advice: Israel has nothing to do with our governments policies. Once you invoke Israel or joos more moderate Brits will tune out.
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
So people will tune out because they hear someones ideas they disagree with and or dislike?
3

@Veyron1967
8 days ago
@DMLaments it’s not hard mate, he’s advocating for a more indigenous England, so why bring Israel into it at all? He is diluting the message and giving the ‘refugees welcome’ brigade an opportunity to attack something irrelevant to the argument.
Mass immigration in the UK is the problem, not Israel. People can see what is happening to our high streets so keep the message simple.
3

Hide replies

@DMFS7
12 days ago
Agree with most of what Mark says but he talks absolute bollocks about Tommy Robinson being paid millions of pounds by Israel! Too bad he wasn’t asked for evidence of that claim just to see the arm waving (he doesn’t have any).
Also, he is being very disingenuous when he whinges about being cancelled and debanked without mentioning the “Young, Nazi, and Proud”.documentary in which he “starred”: it is the main reason that he is considered by many to be beyond the pale. It’s a shame because it was decades ago and we all change a lot in 20 years, but there it is and let’s not pretend it isn’t still tainting him.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
he’s a loud mouthed fool

Hide replies

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
2 weeks ago
I wish Mark would just go away. He stinks so bad. I agree with most of what he says but he is repellent to most human beings. Please don’t support Restore because you will put people off voting for them. This is our last chance man. Please stop talking.
2

@dd7521
13 days ago
Why does he ”stink so bad” especially when you say you agree with most he said?
3

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@dd7521 I’ve been watching Mark since he was leader of the young BNP and he has been caught several times genuinely supporting an Austrian painter. People are desperately trying to paint Restore with the same brush and we don’t need to give them any ammo. If we want to get any real power we need to get the support of the general public and the truth is that Mark is to toxic for most people. He needs to step aside. If we don’t get this right this time we are finished. I want my country back and I don’t want someone like Mark messing it up.
3

@dd7521
13 days ago
​ @blueberrycheesecakesupremo fair enough, thanks for your reply.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@blueberrycheesecakesupremo He is only “toxic” because the liberal media want to continue the narrative – haven’t you learned that by now? You say you agree with most of what he says but then talk about the “general public” as though you are not part of the general public yourself! The “general public” are waking up and going further to the patriotic right
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 The liberal media did not force Collet to send death threats to Nick Griffin…

@JohnnyRollocks-v1z
13 days ago
We tried all that with the BNP I personally joined in 1989 been there and done it all still do a few protest now problem with the British people they still listen to scumbag politicians lying main stream media just look at fake farage and his circus
2

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@JohnnyRollocks-v1z Yeah I know, Farage is a joke
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
Hes an absalute bell end

@alpine7891
12 days ago
Well you’d better get used to it lad cos the people are finally waking up.
7

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 are you insecure?

@alpine7891
12 days ago
​ @jamesquinn9971 I can’t wait! Honestly, it’s gonna happen, we are going to win and get our country back! Woooohooo
2

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 youl just be forgoten like nich griffen was

Hide replies

@JohnWayne-d6y
13 days ago
The problem in the USA is birth right anchor babies… once they have that birth certificate they are legally American Citizens regardless of where or who they are… what a mess the Democrats have made
2

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
Elon, are you listening?
7

@IrishScouse10
6 days ago
good man Mark great interview
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Why’s the doom goblin saying it can’t be done, he’s sold his soul.
5

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
To the juice
2

Hide replies

@SEKreiver
3 days ago
Collett has been fighting the good fight. Great guest!
1

@MrPopeye007
8 days ago
Mark the brave
1

@Pacex76
2 weeks ago
If i said what i think should be done id be arrested
2

@ArthurShilling-f8c
10 hours ago
Nothing about this should even be considered as unreasonable. In fact, this MUST happen and sooner rather than later. If not, the consequences will be dire.

@VikingSimonStabilis
1 day ago
Ethnonationalist, what does that mean?

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
What about the illegals that arrived and where given leave to remain by the home office.
2

@BasilGanglia-b7g
13 days ago
I thought he was a young Ronnie Browne from The Corries. LOL!
2

@DMLaments
13 days ago
Kenny Rogers
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
I’m angloist
3

@niallmurray8654
13 days ago
Well I’m Irish descent born and bred in England and Angloist too
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
To judge other people on the colour of their skin is pathetic
1

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
No one is doing that character and culture. Skin colour doesn’t come into it.
3

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 to judge people because they have a different back ground is pathetic

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
Britain has always had different peoples coming and going the last 2000 yrs has seen all kinds of people , read some history books pal

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
@jamesquinn9971 but to judge people that inflict harm on others is valid. So your argument is pointless. Your saying we should accept harm and abuse just because if we don’t it’s prejudice. You need your head checked. Do by your standards if it’s someone’s culture to rape children that can’t be judged? If someone’s character is evil that can’t be judged? Insanity!
3

@Multiverse82
8 days ago
@jamesquinn9971 I’m not your pal by any means
2

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 are you insecure?

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
Did your mummy not love you argh poor boy

Hide replies

@damthebloodandlandthirsty
8 days ago
small minded little englander – is he unaware of the brits that emigrated to ‘the new world’ – simply recall anyone with british heritage back = instant 99.9% majority

@WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe
2 weeks ago
Mark Collette is rumoured to be a honeytrap operator to get real NationaIists Iocked up . .
I am of the uItra far right spectrum so to speak.. but I would not trust Mark at all, because he isn’t careful enough.
Please beware of this feIIa because many people say he is dangerous !
4

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
There are many of us that actually know Mark, and those rumours are designed to stop anyone listening to him!
12

@apollo53122
2 weeks ago
What people need to be mindful of are people like this who go around spreading malicious rumours about others.
4

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
Simon Tomlin
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@tyronekelly-e6z aka Walter Mitty!
1

@aconcernedcitizen6056
2 weeks ago
Why are you listening to rumors Mr “ultra far right”
Have you met Mark?
Have you ever even attempted to join a real world movement?
15

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Who says that he is dangerous?
Who says he is a “honeytrap”?
Im genuinely curious, I haven’t read that anywhere
11

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments Simon Tomlin. Never shuts up about him.
7

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
How is he getting people locked up? He doesn’t advocate for those things that Simon has led you to believe.
6

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@alpine7891 Tomlin has said, many many times, that people close to Collett keep getting sent down. Sadly, that is true. There’s Sam Melia, the Longshanks fella and another close friend of Mark’s whose name escapes me at the minute. Now I’d argue that these people have done what they did independent of Mark and made their own choices, but it’s still true that people close to Mark have been sent to prison while him and Nick Griffin both got off and still find themselves free of police intervention. I think that’s because Mark doesn’t break the law.
5

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey I mean, Tommy Robinson has been sent down so should we now believe he is to be trusted and telling the truth
It’s more likely Mark has been careful, but who knows in actual fact. But he seems to be doing a great job in waking people up to real Nationalism. He doesn’t slander people and certainly doesn’t punch right and I’ve never heard him advocate or simp towards NS
And he also tells people to avoid NA.
6

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Yeah it was a very long time ago mate.. He was young and immature and admits he’s embarrassed by it. We really should get past that, we’ve all made mistakes. But he’s doing more to waking people up to real Nationalism.. Now if only he still had his YouTube channel with 100k followers…Oh yeah Simons still got his YT and x accounts hasn’t he.. How strange, makes you wonder
2

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Exactly mate

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey they were locked up prior to being involved with Patriotic Alternative, need to get your facts right
3

@ThomasSukhoi
2 weeks ago
Everyone is a fed.
Don’t trust anyone.
It’s hopeless.
1

Hide replies

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We should be live. It is the 19th of December, 2024, and another show for you guys this evening. Our big stories from last week seem to continue to be the big stories again. The war on freedom by the jews perpetuates. So we’ll be talking about that. And with the new laws that they’re proposing to bring it into Victoria because there was a synagogue fire that was allegedly, I think a jew did it. But they haven’t actually determined who did it. But that’s good enough reason, even though they haven’t determined who did it or why, to take away freedoms to politically demonstrate peacefully. Like, what’s the connection? So we’ll discuss that.

 

We’ll also discuss the development of the Parminder Singh Gate or Parmindigate, as it’s been called on Twitter, where, yeah, One Nation have been running this Indian candidate and it’s caused, I mean, the story., … There’s so many new elements to the story. I wrote an opinion piece on it a few days ago for The Noticer and there’s even more elements of the story coming through now. So we’re going to talk about that.

 

Also, there’s been another shooting in America that’s kind of gay and weird, but instead of was, I guess, at least it’s a different shooting than last week. But yeah, this teenage girl, you know, trying to be edgy, doing some dumb school shooting. The alleged manifesto that was her manifesto was, yeah, really like incoherent and weak. So we’ll be discussing that and some other things. Thomas Sewell will be joining us soon as well, so we’ll get his thoughts as well this evening on all of this.

 

But how you doing this evening, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: All right. I just worked out how to share this on an X account because on my phone I can’t see a lot of your tweets. There’s some sort of ban or layer of censorship on the posts that you make. And I still haven’t actually worked out how to get around that on my phone, I think I can see them on my laptop. So I was able to share for the first time, I’m sharing our show on X and I’m glad I figured out how to do it.

 

Other than that, yeah, I’m fine, man! Everything’s good. Been training pretty hard, which has resulted in me feeling a bit more stressed. Well, not feeling stressed, but my body is showing signs of stress. Like I have a little, a mini, little ulcer on my tongue, probably from training too much. But I’m getting more time to train because it’s coming up to the end of the year and clients are starting to drop off, people are getting ready for Christmas, and I have more free time. I’m glad for that you know, it gives me the time, the chance to get inside my own head and process my own thoughts, which I really enjoy doing. Actually, I feel like if I don’t get that time, I get very angry.

 

But, yeah, a little bit tired, but I’ll stay with it. Like you said, the news seems to be just further developments on what we talked about last week, but still interesting.

 

Yeah, just a little segue before we get stuck into it, before Tom arrives, I was just scrolling X as one does, and I saw a picture of what I thought was a young me. I’m like:

 

“Whoa, that looks like me when I was 16 and in construction.”

 

But then on closer inspection, it wasn’t me, but it was posted by Victoria police. They’re looking for a guy. Yeah, see if you can bring it up, because they’re looking for a guy in Balaclava, which is a suburb down in Victoria, Australia, which is heavily populated by jews. I think.

 

Joel Davis: Police are investigating a report of racially motivated offensive behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know what that means exactly, but that looks exactly like me when I was a teenager. Look at that. This looks like skinny, younger me coming home from work.

 

Joel Davis: Pre-steroid Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Come on man! Anyway, scroll down. Scroll down because police.

 

Joel Davis: I got my cop coming in. He didn’t do nothing!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I know. I saw that. And I think it’s one of the best, but keep scrolling down. I mean, everybody, this is a serious story, right? Offensive behaviour, racially motivated offensive conduct. Should read the comments for more information.

 

Joel Davis: What is the charge? Speaking of slur, a succulent ethnic slur! [chuckling] Being White in public is now illegal! Where’s his energy? Motivated violence against Whites by Sudanese immigrants at train stations. Comfy, friend with the big comment there? Yeah, what the fuck is offensive behaviour?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s got to be a list.

 

Joel Davis: Even if I knew him, I wouldn’t report it to you fucking pigs! All the boys in there and the girls. Yeah, look at this guy. He’s just photoshopped a jew’s face. Arrest all people who look like this. People are just going hard in the comments.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what community pressure looks like. That’s what a legitimate, organic community response to a police story looks like. If you give everyone free speech, this is what happens. That’s why free speech is a great thing! That’s why we support free speech, because that gives us the ability to speak. And this is what happens. A lot more people out there have more based opinions than you realise. And threads like that demonstrate that reality.

 

[05:30]

 

Joel Davis: Quite funny. Well, I hope they don’t catch him.

 

But if you do have any information on this individual. Please forward it to the NSN contact bot. We’d love to recruit him. We’re pretty racially motivated ourselves.

 

But anyway, [chuckling] that is a funny story. I mean, hopefully doesn’t get in trouble. I don’t know what happened there, but it’s obviously a nothing burger. Offensive behaviour is the most ridiculous crime. Like, how is that even a crime? We should have a right to behave offensively in this country. I mean, what the hell, we’re Australians! This is ridiculous! But I digress.

 

As I said, there’s a few big stories to talk about the first thing I want to talk about, Blair, you were shutting me down last week because I was talking about how that Luigi, I can’t remember his last name, some Italian shit! That Luigi guy in America who shot the CEO of some health insurance company or whatever. I was saying that the terror, it was kind of gay and boring. You know, his terrorism was boring. It wasn’t interesting. This is a far cry from the interesting terrorists of yesteryear. You know, like Ted Kaczynski or whatever. I’m not going to rattle off all the names. And you were trying to shut me down. You know, you were saying, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Hey, that’s a pretty rough way to put it. I wasn’t trying to shut you down.

 

Joel Davis: Just trying to cancel me. I wasn’t being politically correct enough. The “woke” were coming at me.

 

Blair Cottrell: We need to be smart. If you’re going to start talking about sensitive topics, we need to skim across the surface of them without getting too analytical, you know, sharing opinions. You know, that’s the way things are. I don’t want to be, …

 

Joel Davis: Like I said terrorism, but I was saying the opposite. I was saying that this particular piece of terrorism is gay. And it’s like the, like terrorism has lost its way. And then I think that was an accurate call because then an even gayer form of terrorism happened in America this week, or a few days ago with this 15 year old girl who’s a little edgelord retard decided to shoot up her school and then kill herself for literally no reason. I read the manifesto this week.

 

Blair Cottrell: What is this? I haven’t seen any information on this. Have you got something to bring up on the screen?

 

Joel Davis: I can find something in a sec.

 

But basically she’s a 15 year old girl. Can’t remember her name. But the manifesto was just like deranged rambling about how she doesn’t like her parents and like life sucks! And it was like this like nihilistic yap that had no like discernible point. Like there’s no political message. There was no real existential message. Like it just seemed like she was like moody, like some emo moody chick. And then she’s gone along and like done something crazy like that. Terrorism has just become gay now. I said something on Twitter, like:

 

“Terrorism is like where rock music was in the late 2000s.”

 

You know, it’s just gay and lame at this point. And the only people that take it seriously are like retarded teenage girls. She was obviously trying to do some kind of like Columbine shooting, you know, homage. But at least the Columbine guys had cool clothes and stuff. They were retarded as well. But at least they had like an aesthetic. They had like an energy.

 

The point that I’m making actually is ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] should be happy about my message. My message is that terrorism has become gay. Don’t try terrorism because you’re going to come off like a fag. Like everyone that’s trying to do this stuff lately. That [guy] set himself on fire for Palestine. I can’t remember his name. That was lame as well. It’s all become very like played out at this point. It’s been done. Plenty of others have got the headlines and they’ve done it cooler than you and more interestingly than you. And it’s old at this point! You know, it’s like trying to make a grunge band. It’s like the 90s was like three decades ago. What are you doing? Like, it’s over! No one’s gonna care. You know what I’m saying?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose so.

 

I don’t have a lot of thoughts on the matter. I just think shooting or killing random people because you’re mad about something in order to make a statement and have an impact on society or to attempt to have an impact on society. I just think it’s deranged bullshit, man! I always have. I don’t really find any sort of terrorism interesting. I’m not one of those people who’s like:

 

“Let’s study these psychos and work out the way the psychology of a pervert, or a murderer, or a paedophile!”

 

That’s what modern psychology does. It’s like:

 

“Let’s deconstruct and understand them.”

 

No, you don’t have to understand these people. You just execute them. They’re defective and you just execute them. You know, I have to say that. I can’t say anything even remotely in support of politically motivated violence. Very sensitive times in Australia.

 

[10:28]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, that’s what I’m saying. I’m criticising politically motivated violence. I’m saying every time someone seems to engage in it just keeps getting gayer and gayer. Like, I mean, terrorism is either gay or it’s totally fake! Like this fake jew firebombing on the synagogue. I mean you had 9/11 where the jews blew up the Twin Towers, [see links below re 9/11 being a ZOG false flag] and then like, blamed it on, … Apparently we had to invade Iraq for some reason because an Israeli think tank commissioned by Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1990s, transplanted itself into America, called itself the Project of the New American Century [PNAC]. And then Richard Perle, this dual citizen, ends up saying:

 

“Hey, this idea that we had in this Israeli think tank about invading Iraq in the mid-90s, we’re going to like, dress it up in neocon language and then try and sell it to conservatives in America in 1999.”

 

And then he gets put into the Bush administration and then the jews do the fake 9/11. And then even the official story is that there was Saudi Arabian terrorists. What the hell does that have to do with Iraq?

 

 

But that really pissed everybody off. And then boom, da, da boom! Apparently Saddam Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction and he’s friends with Al Qaeda or something. And then the CIA literally said to the Bush administration:

 

“Well, that’s bullshit! Like, our intelligence doesn’t say that.”

 

And so they created a whole sub-dimension of the government called the Office of Special Plans run by the Zionists and jews in the Bush administration to create all this fake intelligence as a pretext to invade Iraq. We invade Iraq:

 

“Oh, there’s no Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But Israel’s plan from the mid-90s to invade Iraq gets achieved.

 

So this is the jewish playbook. Fake terrorism is a jewish playbook. And you know that basically was used as a pretext to destroy, to basically bring in all these new laws that facilitated mass surveillance and anti-terrorism legislation that is now being used against nationalists and all the rest of it. And they’re doing it again. The jewish playbook of fake terrorism where you know, they burn their own synagogue and then the solution to your synagogue getting firebombed isn’t a task force against political firebombings or religious firebombings or something. That would actually solve the apparent issue that was created. But we haven’t even figured out who did the firebombing. I don’t think we ever will because I think the Counter Terrorism police know that the jews did it to themselves. But apparently the solution is to ban masks at public demonstrations and to prevent people from doing rallies within 150 meters of religious buildings, which by the way, there’s churches all through the centre of Melbourne.

 

So that means that like major landmarks in Melbourne, like I think Flinders Street Station, we’ve done rallies before over the years. I remember watching a video of you, Blair, from I think Tom might have been there too. This is like from like eight or nine years ago you guys did a rally at Flinders Street Station. And obviously we did the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally earlier this year, you know, at Flinders Street Station or partially at Flinders Street Station. So that’s a very significant landmark in Melbourne, right across from Fed Square. But it’s within 150 meters of a church. So now you can’t do a demonstration there? Oh well, not now. But when these laws inevitably get passed. What the hell does that have to do with firebombing? Firebombing is already illegal. Why can’t you just prosecute the firebombing?

 

But what this shows is that what jews are afraid of isn’t actually terrorism, but they’re afraid of his criticism! You know, every time jews do a fake terror attack, all the laws that they get passed and the agenda that gets passed has nothing to do with the original thing. It’s just an excuse to violate your rights and to direct the government into doing things that the jews already wanted to do prior to the alleged act. And we’ve seen now as well, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think jews are afraid of criticism?

 

Joel Davis: Well, they’re afraid of criticism because they’ve committed crimes on like a societal scale. They subverted this country. They have incredible power, way more power than they should have as 0.4% of the population.

 

And also they use that power to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Israel’s got nothing to do with Australia. Why does Peter Dutton do press conferences with the Australian flag and the Israeli flag behind him? Why? Why is Israel even an issue in Australian politics? It’s on the other side of the fucking world! What relevance does it have to us? Nothing! The relevance it has is that jews control Australia. Jews control Australian politics. Like what the Jacinta Allan, the Premier of Victoria, said in a press conference is:

 

“This is what we’re going to do for the jews.”

 

And then outlined a whole series of laws that they’re going to pass. She literally said:

 

“This is for the jews!”

 

That’s crazy! They’re 0.4% of the population. Why do they just have the major parties? Because the Liberals love the jews even more than Labor. Why are they falling over themselves to prove how much they love the jews and prostrate themselves before them and say:

 

“We’re doing as much as we can to pass as many laws to make it impossible for the people you don’t like!”

 

Which isn’t just us. They’re coming after us to try to destroy our ability to protest, but they’re also going after the pro-Palestine Left. They want to shut down any kind of political activity that jews don’t like. And this is somehow relevant because if people do political activity that’s critical of jews, someone might want to go and firebomb a synagogue or something. And so like, you can’t just have a law against firebombing. You have to completely control how people think and how people act so just ban all criticism of jews from society entirely. I mean, it’s ridiculous! It’s tyrannical!

 

But nevertheless, what the government is showing is that to them, jewish feelings matter more than our freedoms or any kind of modicum of fairness. I mean, there was a church in Geelong that was burnt down a few weeks ago. Where’s the anti-Christian task force? There was a priest stabbed in Sydney earlier this year in the middle of a church service by a Muslim terrorist. You know, like it’s only the jews that get these special protections.

 

[16:47]

 

Blair Cottrell: Not just interject for a moment to draw attention to Tom Sewell’s new moustache. Looking great, mate! Kind of reminiscent of Mosley or something. What made you go with the stash?

 

Thomas Sewell: Hello, can you hear me?

 

Blair Cottrell: Loud and clear.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is the first stream that I’ve done for the Joel, … Sorry, let me just mute all my shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: … For a few weeks, man! What’s happening?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I needed some time to process, you know, digest. There’s a lot going on in the world, obviously. But, yeah, I got a new cam and a new mic, so hopefully I’m coming through nice and clear. The MO was just “Movember” for last month, and I decided to keep it because my dad had a MO when I was born. So I figured I’ll keep it until the next one’s born. I got a baby on the way, so could be anytime soon. I won’t say exactly how soon, but very soon.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, congratulations, man! It’s exciting stuff! Lots of boys having babies in the community throughout Australia, I’ve noticed. Lots of new families being started. Some guys quite young, too. They’re getting started young. They’re like 22 years old. Punching our kids already, which is awesome to see. I think it’s better off having kids when you’re younger. They’re bound to be healthier when you’re younger. What do you guys think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I do regret in some ways not starting younger. And the main reason for that is. Yeah, it’s the first six months especially is really hard, and it takes up a lot of your time. It all works out, I think, anyway. At the end of the day, you either have kids early and then you develop that part of your life while you’re young. And then when you’re older, you can develop deeper parts of your understanding philosophy. You have more time to yourself.

 

I mean, I know a lot of Boomers and a lot of that generation, once their kids grow up, they kind of just go on holiday. But I think what you’re meant to do is leave some sort of intellectual legacy. You’re meant to do something worthwhile. A lot of people just, it’s sort of career or holiday. They don’t really think about anything more than that.

 

But the other way of doing it, rather than having kids and then developing that stuff later, is you develop in your 20s and 30s, your world view and your philosophy, your personal constitution, and then you have kids later, in which case you’re going to then struggle to have time to continue to develop, but hopefully you’ve laid enough of a foundation. So I think it balances out. But I would have preferred to have been changing nappies and going through screaming babies in my early 20s than my early 30s. So I sympathize with those in their 40s that are doing it. I can certainly think of better things to be doing in my 40s than dealing with screaming babies. Because you just want peace and quiet.

 

As a man, I think the most important thing for developing your personal constitution is peace and quiet. And if you’re just in constant baby family chaos, you can’t really develop like your drive, your mission, your focus. You kind of just caught up in the feminine chaos of the babies. So it makes me think a lot about our ancestors and our ancestral culture. A lot of ancient Germanic and Celtic cultures. They didn’t! The father didn’t really have much of a this is what I’ve read. I don’t know if this is fact, but what I’ve read is that the fathers didn’t have much input until the sons turned 10 and there was sort of a transfer of ownership. Men sort of stayed out of the mums and bubs club, so to speak, and the toddlers and all that. Obviously you’re still there, you’re still present, but you know, there’s a water fight usually. So yeah, not until a boy’s around 10 years old is there that one on one time consistently.

 

Blair Cottrell: I could imagine you would feel once you’ve had a child even more of a drive to make a difference and to do something that makes you useful. Do you find that’s a sensation you’ve experienced after having a kid?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! It’s what ties us to the infinite.

 

So I believe that our children are our afterlife and that we heal this world by making better humans. I think that’s the primary point of what we’re doing. We make better humans. We’re in this mess because of shit humans. We can talk about the jews, we can talk about the Africans, we can talk about all these horrible circumstances, economic pressures. But all of this, in my opinion, is secondary to the quality of humans we’re producing. And if we produce better quality humans in terms of environment, stock, that software, you know what operating system, what personal constitution are you plugging into them? How are you explaining the world to them? And how are you helping them grow and adapt and overcome this dystopian society that we live in?

 

So to me that’s absolutely crucial and it’s extremely motivating because. Yeah, it’s like when you have kids, then you’re trying to create a better world for them, not just like your motivation is now rooted to the centre.

 

[22:01]

 

Blair Cottrell: And why wouldn’t you make better quality versions of yourself if you could? Why wouldn’t you make copies of yourself? I mean, our own lives in the span of all existence, eternity, are absurdly short. Our lives are like a blip on the screen. And we are here now because our parents, their parents, all made copies of themselves. We are just copies of our forefathers, forebearers. So I’ve always believed the same thing too. Like, what is a greater purpose than trying to breed a higher humanity? At the end of the day, that’s the only real meaning of life that in this physical realm we can understand to be true and worth pursuing.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So anyway, onto the news stories. I think I’ll just play this clip, actually. I’ll get you guys to react. I know a lot of people have probably seen it, but this is the Premiere of Victoria, Jacinta Allan announcing these new laws that they want to pass.

 

Jacinta Allan: Today, the government of Victoria renews its promise to jews and to everyone of every background. Whoever you are, whoever you pray to, you deserve to be safe and welcome here in this state. Today too, we support that promise with strong action, strong action to fight hate and help Victorians heal! Action that I will now outline. We will be setting a standard, a standard that we do not tolerate anti-semitism. We do not tolerate anti-semitism! Just as we do not tolerate any form of hate, racism or discrimination against a jew, a Muslim, a Sikh, a Hindu, a Chinese Victorian, or against a woman, against a gay, lesbian or trans person. It’s all despicable! All racism is wrong! All racism is evil! It’s hateful, it’s corrosive. And anti-semitism is racism! And there are too many, there are too many who want to qualify anti-semitism or make excuses for it. And I want to make it absolutely clear that I never will!

 

We’ve also had enough of the protests that have caused division and disruption in our streets. Now, peaceful protests can and must be protected in this state. Protests that harm others cannot!

 

Firstly, we will ban the flags and symbols of listed terrorist organisations in public. That includes Hamas, Hezbollah and several other groups, including White national extremists and radical, racist, violent extremist Right-wing groups. We will also ban the use of face masks and balaclavas at protests. We know they are being used to conceal identities, shield agitators from crowd control measures, like capsicum spray. Well, face masks aren’t a free pass to break the law. And there should be no place to hide in this state if you’re a racist stirring up hate on the streets.

 

And we’re also going to ban the use of glue, rope, chains, locks and other dangerous attachment devices that protesters use to cause maximum disruption and also endanger others. There was an incident that occurred, an incident that was both rightly condemned, but also an incident that became the Genesis of the work that we have released on introducing stronger anti-vilification laws to the Victorian Parliament. But we know it’s rearing its head again and we will act. We will legislate to protect the right for people to gather and pray free from fear, free from harassment and free from intimidation from, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, she only mentions enemies of the jewish community. Like apparently anti-fascist violence is fine. One of the boys had his car firebombed about a year ago around Christmas, a year ago. That was Leftist extremism. But apparently that’s not a problem because they don’t cause any issue for the jewish community, they only target the enemies of jews! An important point, I think.

 

Joel Davis: No, of course! Also you notice there, she didn’t mention in these list of protected groups Whites or any religions that Whites practice in any serious number when she was mentioning religions. So it’s typical, but it’s nevertheless exposing what we say is true, it’s revealing, the system is showing its face that, yeah, as you just said quite accurately, the number one protected community is the jews. No one is allowed to criticise them.

 

And then the number two protected communities are basically everyone who isn’t White. And yeah, the banning face masks thing, that will be interesting. Obviously we use them at demonstrations, but we also get criticised a lot for using them. So now we’re just going to have to, probably when they pass these laws in Victoria, we’re going to have to do demonstrations without face masks.

 

Blair Cottrell: I gotta say this, you guys could look cooler without the masks. I mean, you’re good looking boys. This could be a beautiful blessing in disguise.

 

[27:14]

 

Joel Davis: We’ve had internal debates about it. Like a lot of us want to take the masks off. And I think it will make us look more human to the public.

 

So yeah, it could backfire. Like the jews have banned the Roman salute, they’ve banned the masks and everyone says:

 

“Oh I like what you guys do, but the balaclavas and the Roman salutes that not going to appeal to normies.”

 

Well, the jews are forcing us to have normie appeal! So if this is how they’re going to play it, I guess we’re going to have to play it by these rules. You know, it is what it is. It’ll be interesting to see if it ends up backfiring on the jews and they just end up making us more popular with the public.

 

So I think also the jews are making themselves less popular with the public because they’re making this very explicit, like for a very long time, when you start talking about the jews in Australia, people are like:

 

“What are you like? This is crazy talk!”

 

And also it’s very abstract. You’re talking about the banking system or international finance or things happening in America, things happening in the Middle East, things happening historically in Europe, doesn’t feel very real and important to average everyday Australians and their average everyday lives. But this is very explicit. This is the jews coming after your freedoms in Australia in 2024. This is the jews attacking you! Flexing on you!

 

And so now the jewish problem isn’t just some abstract problem. It isn’t just some thing that fringe people talk about. Now. This is actually something that everyday Australians have to be confronted with, which is that they live in a jewish dominated society. And why does 0.4% of the population get to order the government around? Why does the government, why are the major parties falling all over themselves to grovel to this group? They’re not a significant voter base. There’s barely any jewish voters.

 

So the only reason that they could be groveling to them is because they have money and power! It’s the only reason! They have a lot of it! And that should concern you that your government is beholden to a tiny ethnic group with incredible money and power that can essentially, according to the whims of its hysteria, trash your rights!

 

But what’s interesting is that I’m seeing a lot of criticism for these new laws from the far-Left. And also maybe I don’t mind that Antifa’s not allowed to wear masks anymore. You know, they also going to bring in anti-doxing laws in Australia, which the jews pushed for because some jews got doxed by pro-Palestinian activists or whatever.

 

So they’re going to ban doxing, they’re going to ban face masks. What’s Antifa going to do now? Like their whole strategy is kind of fucking! Like they can’t go, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Disguises aren’t banned. You just wear disguises. As long as it’s not like a face covering.

 

Joel Davis: Well, what kind of disguise can you wear that isn’t a face covering?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s like stockings that change your face, but they’re not really a mask or you could wear. And they don’t even look like you’re wearing a mask.

 

Joel Davis: I think the law might still cover that. I mean, we don’t know the exact legislation right now, but I would anticipate they wouldn’t leave any of those easy loopholes like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: You never know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I guess we’ll see. But I think, it’s interesting, Antifa’s gonna have to take the masks off. They can’t dox people anymore. Now you’re gonna be able to start, you’re gonna be able to sue the Left. If they dox you for being a White nationalist or something and try and get you fired from your job, you can go after them now. Media too. So that’s interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one on the Right seems to sue anyone. Well, there’s been a couple of, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, they should we need to try and make use of these laws and because doxing is one of the main weapons the enemy uses to keep people scared, to speak out or even to maintain anonymous accounts or whatever.

 

So there’s been plenty of people over the years that I know of that have been advocates for our way of thinking to some level or degree that have been doxed and they’ve been taken out, wiped off the Internet or had their careers ruined or their lives ruined in one way, shape or form. So that’s interesting. But that’s a little bit, that’s a bit of a separate issue.

 

But the point is that the rules are changing. Yeah, like I’m annoyed at the rules changing, but it isn’t actually the worst set of rule changes. Like we can adapt to these rule changes. It’s not going to stop us.

 

So you know it, all they’re doing is showing their hand. But they’re not really getting a huge win out of this. Like it seems to me to be a misstep where they’re pissing everyone off. I’ve seen the Left is pissed off! Libertarians are pissed off!

 

A lot of people that are kind of more pro-Israel or whatever that are on the conservative side, they’re really struggling to defend this. You know, they look kind of silly at this point because now it’s not just about being pro-Palestine or it’s not just about being pro-this group or that group now. It’s like:

 

“Well, our freedoms!”

 

I thought the whole point of being allied with Israel is that they’re a liberal democracy and the Judeo-Christian values and our rights and freedoms and all this bullshit! Well, they’re just showing that’s all nonsense and doesn’t mean anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you actually think that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I never thought that, but I’m talking about what conservatives think. I’m saying like the narratives are kind of collapsing to defend the jews from a lot of corners ideologically and they’re losing a lot of support from all corners. You know, when I’ve been making anti, … I’ll go and leave comments on Twitter that’ll be calling out the jews, but they’ll be some anti-Israel comment. And then I see all the likes are all Leftists. Like a lot of Leftists are genuinely like anti-semitic at this point. They aren’t just anti-Israel. Like, I don’t know, The Times are changing. The jews don’t have a lot of friends and they’re rapidly destroying their friendships in a lot of corners. And they’ve just got all this power they’re holding on. They’re kind of ham fisting through the power and influence that they have on the basis of their finances and their elite institutional power. But they’re not doing it very good of selling it. Their optics is terrible, their public relations is terrible!

 

So it’s a perfect environment for us to spread our message against them. So I invite them to make missteps like this to be honest, I’m not. I actually think it’s in a certain way, like it’s a bad thing that they’re doing. Obviously we don’t want these laws, but in a certain way I invite them to do things like this because it’s only proving our point and strengthening our position politically in a certain way.

 

What do you think about that Tom? Do you agree or disagree?

 

[33:31]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll let Blair go first.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was just thinking maybe in the long run it will create strong sense of dissatisfaction, disloyalty in the general community, or maybe they can downgrade the quality of the people so much that kind of fear Police State will be enough to administer them long term. I just think like in the immediate future having laws against anti-semitism which, it’s quite a vague basis for any set of laws, which leads to the police kicking your door down because of some comment you made on the Internet that’s offensive, racially offensive, whatever, probably isn’t a good thing in the short term.

 

Joel Davis: The anti-vilification laws are concerning. Those are different laws than these ones. But yeah, those are the more concerning ones. Those were going to have to fight hard in the courts.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah it doesn’t feel like there are enough people with the right sort of stuff and legal prowess to actually put up a good fight. But I could be wrong. The Clive Palmers out there might have a building full of lawyers that may be useful for that purpose.

 

But it’s probably about time some people who still believe in protecting Australia dedicate some resources to defending the rights of Australians. I don’t have any power. I’m just sitting down here in the suburbs trying to run my business and doing my best to pay my taxes. I’m not the sort of person that knows lots of lawyers and that has a lot of influence in this field. But I don’t know, hopefully people out there get the message sooner or later.

 

And I’m not seeing any great effort right now in the courts to actually establish, you know, boundaries, freedom of expression for Australians to challenge this legislation that is used to justify hate speech crime and stuff like that. But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this kind of stuff is just hushed up and I don’t know about it. I’m just saying that I think in the short term all these things can be bad.

 

However, I understand what you’re saying. It’s clear overreach. And it lends to the criticism or observations that we’ve already made and we’re trying to make other people aware of that the jewish people do have a great deal of power in our country. Undue power! How did they get it? Who’s allowing them to have it? And how do we take back power for ourselves and establish a destiny, a future existence for ourselves as Australians. Because right now we don’t seem to have one.

 

Joel Davis: No, exactly! But what you were saying though, there was a lot of coalescence of support around Jacob [Hersant] and his court battles and that’s going up the courts. We don’t expect the lower courts to strike down laws and rule in our favour, but we do expect to have a strong case going up to the Supreme Court and then particularly in the High Court. And the same thing with this anti-vilification legislation. What is key is that the first people that get charged with this stuff, which will probably be our guys in a lot of these situations because they’re going to come for us with these laws, is riding it all the way up to the High Court. And for that we need community support from the nationalist community in general. But not just that, we need to go out beyond that and get libertarians and other adjacent factions that care about defending these rights.

 

Blair Cottrell: Here’s the thought. How long will White Australian cops willingly enforce these laws? Is there always going to be people who are willing to trade the future of their country for a meagre wage? Or eventually are most cops going to fall off and be replaced with Indians, Chinese and so forth?

 

Joel Davis: That’s already happening, isn’t it, because of Covid? I mean a lot of the all the good cops left during Covid and now they’re bringing in foreigners as police. And they’re not just like immigrants, they’re literally recruiting from foreign countries.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re going to have a significant physical advantage over the police force if it ends up being completely Indian, for example. And so it’s like that’ll be interesting times, that’ll be sporty times.

 

Joel Davis: No, I would definitely like a situation where NSN’s on the streets and we swell up. We’ve got like some better than like bigger numbers and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re the police now!

 

Joel Davis: These cops show up and it’s on. That’d be a funny interaction, if and when it happens. What a juxtaposition.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll make more people support us. More White Australian support us. When they see that it’s Indian cops versus the White lads that have to be mask off and maybe have to carry Australian flags and all the other sort of optics cuckery we’re forced into by the State, I think that’s just going to Garner more and more public support. So in a strange kind of accelerationist or anti-accelerationist way, the government is strengthening our position in the eyes of the public. They’re doing all these things in hopes that we give up, but we’re actually not going to give up. We’ve picked this strategy because it’s the most effective at creating that juxtapositional, that shock and awe strategy to wake the public up into action. And over time we’re going to become more and more legitimate. But it’s very hard to create legitimacy when no one puts up any opposition. And if they do put up opposition, it’s so tame that it doesn’t even get any attention.

 

[39:01]

 

So you have to get the people’s attention first. I’m not saying you get attention and then you start mellowing out your message. You maintain a strong message and everyone knows what you’re about. And most people have a decent memory. Even if they get confused by the current thing every two weeks, they still have a decent memory as to:

 

“Well, those are the racists!”

 

And we’re normalizing racism, we’re normalizing White nationalism and White people are overall getting to the point where they’re just upset with how the state of the country is.

 

And then they’re about to have Christmas and they want to just relax and wind down and celebrate. And it’s a spiritual and it’s a cultural time of year for White people and they turn on the news and it’s just jews complaining that there’s not enough laws against people that hate them.

 

And as a White person, you’re watching that and you’re just like:

 

“When are these jews going to shut up? Are they ever going to be happy?”

 

And then you hear that more money is going to them and we’re in a cost of living crisis. And if you’ve been paying attention, you know that they already get hundreds of millions of dollars a year for their so-called “security”, which they funnel into their fake security companies that they launder money back into the synagogue and probably do all sorts of dubious things with it once they’ve got it there.

 

And on top of that it goes into CSG [Community Security Group] here in Victoria, which is a Mossad front group which is funded by the Australian taxpayer and the Victorian taxpayer. So on top of that, the way that the politicians are handling it is the worst possible way to handle it. I guess they’re just not equipped with any sort of nuance. But I personally am sick, and I say this almost every stream with you guys when you put a politician up like the video up. And my initial instinct or reaction was I feel like I’m in primary school! Like listening to this Jacinta Allan:

 

“We do not do anti-semitism!”

 

[Blair putting in some eye drops] What’s going on there? Clear us. You’re right, Blair? We’re back.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes. My eyes get a bit dry. But while I’m interjecting, don’t you agree though that it’s like the jewish version of rioting. I said this to Joel the other day. The jewish response to the synagogue fire is like the jewish version of a riot. It’s not physical. It’s like complaining:

 

“Give us money, give us rights, give us more laws!”

 

Joel Davis: Because they’re a feminine race, passive aggressive response.

 

Blair Cottrell: If the government could learn, see the way the Assyrians reacted to a terror attack against Bishop Murray, the Christian Assyrians they physically rioted. And the government’s response to that was:

 

“No tolerance!”

 

They arrested the Christians and made a strong effort to demonstrate themselves, you know, controlling the situation, containing the situation:

 

“This riot’s not acceptable!”

 

Why doesn’t the government take the same position towards the jewish version of rioting, which is just, as I said, kvetching.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they’re all just a bunch of primary school teachers. These politicians aren’t leaders, they’re just primary school teachers. And they just lecture the public the way a primary school teacher lectures a small child. Like:

 

“We do not do anti-semitism, we do not do anti-semitism!”

 

I mean, who are they talking to?

 

And then the other thing that I noticed was the it’s a little bit of a will to power, to be honest, to give them a bit of fairness. Not that they deserve it, but they haven’t passed these laws yet. But they always speak as if they’ve already passed them or that they’re going to pass.

 

So they’re saying:

 

“We’re going to, …”

 

Well, that’s technically not correct. Not to sound like a conservative, but you’re going to “try to change the law”. That’s what they’re planning on doing. You’re going to try. What the accurate statement would be is:

 

“We’re going to try to change the law to strengthen these religious vilification laws.”

 

But they didn’t say that, they said:

 

“We’re going to change the law.”

 

So although it’s got a bit of a will to power and there’s a bit of strength to that, it’s the only strength they really portray is when jews are under attack. All of a sudden the government are very strong. But the problem is that that might work on some people, but the average Joe wants to at least pretend that we live in a democracy. And when that is no longer the tone at which they’re being spoken to by their leaders, they’re not going to be looking for Democratic or liberal means to counter the way that the centre Left is speaking to them. They’re going to be looking for a slightly more authoritarian tone amongst the centre Right, which I guess goes into our next point, doesn’t it Joel?

 

The self implosion of One Nation. [chuckling] Where the centre is going now is in two places. You know, the Left are just doubling down and the Right doesn’t know what to do and doesn’t have any representation within The Liberal Party or Labor Party or One Nation for that matter. And they’re absolutely begging now for a semi-authoritarian centre Right, that has that same kind of tone. Because there has to be a balancing. There has to be this harmony, for politics to survive as a democracy, there has to be equal weights on either side of the centre. And otherwise it keeps tipping one way until the Left take total state power and just tell you what’s going on. They don’t even consult.

 

[44:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: But we talked about on the show last.

 

Thomas Sewell: Do you want to move on to the next subject or was there more?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll bring it in. But I’m just going to reiterate what we were talking about last week. I don’t know if I use the term “Bitchocracy”. It’s like, whoever bitches the hardest rules. But I use the term like that. And I was describing how like Anthony Albanese, when he gave your statements last week, he was like:

 

“Jews need to feel safe!”

 

And I was like, politicians didn’t used to talk like this, even back in the 2000s, where they talk about “feelings” like it’s a total like, feminisation of the language. Like you said, when you use the analogy of the primary school, that’s basically the level that public discourse is at now.

 

But it’s obviously very effective because when you move the discussion into feelings, then you don’t actually need to like, back it up with any kind of fairness or facts or whatever. It’s just like, I think I made the analogy on Twitter. Like, our relationship with the jews is like a shitty marriage where nothing you do is ever good enough and nothing they do you can never like, bring up. Otherwise you’re mean and you’re making them feel horrible and so on and so that’s what the jews want. They want to classify all criticism of their behaviour as “anti-semitism”. No criticism of jewish behaviour is tolerated, full stop, end of discussion!

 

But at the same time, they want to then dictate policy. They want to basically run society. How can you be in charge but then at the same time also demand zero criticism? And then play the victim, like:

 

“Oh, like, I can’t believe you would say that. That’s just like another ‘Holocaust’!”

 

You know, it’s ridiculous! But that’s literally the situation that we’re in, and that’s fundamentally unstable. Like, yeah, they’re trying to brute force it, but ultimately you need to rule with carrots and sticks.

 

And at the moment it’s all stick and no carrot. And jews don’t know how to rule. Just it’s like having a single mom. Single moms don’t know how to raise young boys because they don’t understand how to, they don’t have that innate ability basically to know when to basically go hard and when to go soft. If you are just constantly, when you’re raising a child, I mean, I’m not a father, but this is obviously true. If you’re just constantly super strict and just like being like:

 

“Don’t do this, don’t do that!”

 

And constantly like bitching and moaning and everything that they do, they’re not going to take any of it that seriously because it’s no matter what they do, you’re just reacting in the same way. And it’s really more, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Dogs are the same. If you keep giving dogs incessant stupid commands, they stop listening to anything.

 

Joel Davis: Frivolous. They don’t take you seriously.

 

If you want to instil fear in a population, you wait until you’re very upset about something. You have your red lines and then you get really angry! But otherwise you’re chill. And that’s how you, that’s how people respect your rules. Because they know, like, okay, those are the red lines, they’re very clear.

 

But this is the complete opposite. In our society today, all the lines are ambiguous. All these new laws that they’re bringing in, they have all these ambiguous definitions. There’s all these double standards and triple standards based upon feelings:

 

“Well, if this group does it, it makes this group of people feel upset and they’re victims for this reason. And so we have to care about this, but when the roles are reversed or like, …”

 

It’s just retarded! So there’s no legitimacy or coherence to any of this. All they’re going to do is push people into more sympathy to our position when we call it out.

 

But I will say:

 

Secondarily, the main reason why the Left is winning and the conservatives are losing in general., … The jewish issue is different. On the jewish issue, the conservatives are even deeper up the arsehole of the jews than the Left, frankly. The jews completely just own the conservative movement. It’s grotesque! But on every other issue, on these issues of free speech and political correctness and wokeness and anti-White double standards and so on the conservative attitude is always, … Because in politics you got a Left-wing position, a Right-wing position, and everything that happens is centrism. You never get what the far-Left and the far-Right want, never actually happens. Within a democracy, everything that happens is always, is always basically at the centre, in perpetuity.

 

Now what Left-wingers do is they run away from the centre towards the most radical Left-wing position they can possibly go for. And what that does is it then stretches the Overton Window and then the centre then shifts towards the Left. What Right-wingers do is go, hey, or conservatives, I should say is:

 

“Oh, hey, the centre always wins. So let’s go and jump in the centre and occupy the centre and be like, we’re the reasonable people in the centre. We’re not like these fringe lunatics. And then we’ll win because the centre always wins.”

 

[49:42]

 

But what they do by jumping in the centre is they then push the centre away from them, in between them and wherever the Left is. And so when you chase the centre, you’re constantly chasing the centre and you’ll never grab it because you’re constantly pushing it away from yourself while you chase after it. You have to run away from the centre to drag it in your direction. That’s the basic mechanics of a liberal democracy.

 

And this is why they always lose. Even if they win, conservatives win most elections. Like Liberal Party was just in power for like a decade. There was a brief period where you had like Rudd and Gillard for a few years. Then you had Howard in charge for ages. If you go through Australian history, the conservatives pretty much are always in power. The Left barely gets power. But when the Left gets power, they completely change the entire country, initiate all these new reforms, and then the next conservatives are getting in, basically have the same policies and just like entrench them.

 

So even though the Right wins elections, the Left always wins on the issues, all the big issues. Unless it’s the jews. Then when it comes to the jews, then that goes out the window. Right?

 

But I want to bring the reason why I articulate that because I want to bring up this story. So we talked about Parminder Singh on the show last week, who is a Sikh guy who can’t speak English properly. Yeah, he speaks with this broken English. And he’s being run for the Upper House in the upcoming Western Australian election by One Nation. And a Twitter account popped up a few days ago just after I wrote my opinion piece in The Noticer, which by the way, go check it out. It’s called One Nation Goes Full Retard. [https://www.noticer.news/one-nation-goes-full-retard/] I articulated basically the state of things with the Parminder Singh issue earlier in the week, but now all this new stuff has come to light.

 

 

So this page dropped called Parminder Singh One Nation Exposed. This guy says he’s a disgruntled former One Nation candidate and member with direct information over the coming days on Rod Caddies, who is the leader of One Nation in Western Australia and Parminder Singh.

 

Now, what he exposed was this. Well, one of the things he exposed. So Parminder Singh has a company called Punjabi Properties, and you can see on the back of these shirts, which are official One Nation merchandise. Punjabi Properties is displayed all across the back of these shirts. So, like what? One Nation is now sponsored by Punjabi Properties? This is all happening while Pauline Hanson is posting about how we’ve got to end foreign ownership and immigration is too high and all this kind of stuff. Yes, he’s posting here about how Rod Caddies is blocking everyone. He blocked me. He’s blocking all of everyone who’s asking questions. He’s not going to take accountability for his actions.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who is Rod Caddies?

 

Joel Davis: The guy who runs One Nation in Western Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: He put up a video. I think maybe he put up the video actually, after we did it on the show last week. I’ll pull up that video soon. And in that video, he basically wheeled this Parminder guy out to explain that he agreed. No, he agrees with all of Pauline Hanson’s policies, even though we’ve got him on record saying the exact opposite, even as like earlier this year on his Facebook account.

 

And also he ran for office. When he ran for office in local government, I believe Canberra, which level of government it was. When he ran without the One Nation endorsement, one of his policies was “repopulating rural areas with immigrants”. His policy was to bring immigrants into country towns to help build up their population. That doesn’t sound like anti-immigration to me. It sounds like the exact opposite. And he actually reiterated that statement on his Facebook account in his customary tortured, broken English with terrible grammar. It barely makes sense, but you could at least get that’s what he was saying. He also defended the student visa thing, saying:

 

“Oh, well, if we don’t bring students in on student visas, how are universities going to make money?”

 

And when he was talking to What’s News on a video that we watched in the show last week on a phone interview, he was like:

 

“Oh, Indian immigrants are good because they bring money into Australia.”

 

And he even made the point that:

 

“Oh, well, White Australians they don’t want to work hard enough. They don’t want to work on weekends, they don’t want to work 80 to 100 hour weeks. They expect to be paid over $30 an hour.”

 

And this is why they, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Need to give this perspective. He actually did say that? He said he thinks Australians are lazy because they won’t work 100 hours a week. 100 hours a week is over 14 hours per day, every day of the week. That’s the idea of a normal working week for this dude who’s running now Western Australia, in One Nation as a candidate.

 

[54:22]

 

 

Joel Davis: This is like the slave mentality of Indians. This is why the globalists, the big business, the jews, that’s why they want to bring Indians into, or one of the reasons why they want to bring them in. I mean, for some groups like far-Left and the jews, they just want to replace us out of like racial animus towards the White race. But from a business standpoint, one of the reasons they want to bring it in, and from a political standpoint is because they’re a slave race.

 

You know, every time I’ve had a conversation, unfortunately in my life, when I’ve been subjected to Indians through my employment, whenever I’ve had the misfortune of having to make small talk with them, all they talk about is how to make money and how to spend money. That’s literally the substance of everything that they want to talk about every single time! They have purely economic mindset, like, of a slave. They don’t have like a sense of freedom, a sense of like higher spirituality or any of these things that White people have. A sense of high dignity or honour or any of these things. And so that makes them easier to rule.

 

That’s why we could show up to India during the British Empire with, 200,000 Anglos and run their whole continent of like hundreds of millions of slave browns. And we did it for hundreds of years and it was easy, because they’re a pathetic race. And this is why they want to bring them in because they’ll accept shitty conditions and they’ll work long hours and they’ll work three different jobs because all they care about is money and the quality of life in India sucks! It’s still better than back home and this is great for big business, but it’s depressing your wages and destroying your quality of life. And that’s the whole point of voting One Nation right? They’re the one party that’s going to shut down the borders and stop this shit! But now they’re running this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s exactly why the financial sector lobbies the major parties to bring in as many Indians as possible because they’ll live in little Jeet boxes, as Joel calls them. They’ll work for less and they’ll work longer hours. And all big business cares about is people working more for less.

 

Obviously the quality of the goods being produced isn’t going to be as good, but they don’t care about that. People are going to still have to buy it if they’re the only ones offering it.

 

So, yeah, it is all just about replacing the Australian working class with a more manageable slave race. I’ve been saying that for years, actually. What do you think Tom? Do you think they have souls? Do you think Indians have souls?

 

Thomas Sewell: I do.

 

Joel Davis: We’re going deep here.

 

Thomas Sewell: I do. But I believe that souls aren’t really a binary. I believe that they’re a spectrum. So I believe dogs have souls. So of course Indians would have them as well, but they’re just not very large, they’re not very high. Yeah, they’ve got a very mediocre soul. There would be maybe one in a million that would have a very high soul, like a high Aryan soul. White people have huge potential in their soul, but they don’t use it. White people are like the stereotype of the talented person that never uses what they have. White people don’t, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re just capable of so much, … Has Tom cut out or have I cut out?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Tom’s frozen up for me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’ll be back.

 

Joel Davis: His connection was a little bit dodgy before. Hopefully he gets it sorted. While we’re waiting for him to figure that out. Oh, you’re back Tom?

 

Blair Cottrell: I like hearing these takes, though. I like hearing these deep esoterics.

 

Joel Davis: He still seems kind of frozen up there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Am I back? Can you hear me?

 

Joel Davis: You’re back.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re in the first world country of Australia. I pay the top rate for the Internet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently the NBN maintenance crew is Indian now as well.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think One Nation has been taking tips or the NBN have been taking tips from One Nation on their hiring policies. You know, they got the $25 an hour Jeets doing maintenance.

 

Anyway, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Infrastructure will fall apart in our lifetime. I guarantee everyone that.

 

I mean, I have friends in South Africa and they tell me that you may as well live rurally as long as you’re protected. Because in the cities there’s just constant blackouts. There’s just constant infrastructure issues. Yeah. With what Elon Musk is doing with the Starlink, it doesn’t matter whether you’re rural or in the city anymore.

 

So the infrastructure is garbage! I can’t believe how much the Internet drops out. But back on topic, prior to your question about whether Indians have souls or not, just the blatant, it’s like some strange form of corruption I’ve never personally seen., …

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s gone again. That’s really frustrating. He was going to say something good. He was about to say, …

 

Joel Davis: He was cucking. Yeah. It’s annoying.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is a pain in the ass.

 

Joel Davis: Be back.

 

Thomas Sewell: What an absolute pain in the ass.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m gonna drop off. I’ll just make my last point. But the Internet is just intolerable and you guys are all blurry for me. I thought it was your Internet’s playing up. And I was like, sweet, my Internet’s fine. And then I clicked on the stream. I was like:

 

“Oh, it’s actually me!”

 

Joel Davis: I’m gonna blame ZOG.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s just excellent! It’s excellent to see that One Nation. This won’t be forgiven. Especially in WA [West Australia]. It might be forgiven in the rest of the country because Noticer News is not Sky News yet, but one day it will be.

 

Thomas Sewell: But in WA, this is not going to be forgiven. And it’s good to see that it even led to or impacted or pressured the one sitting MP or Senator to actually drop off. I don’t know if that’s been covered on the stream yet, but I saw that recently as well.

 

[1:00:26]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, I was gonna bring that up Yeah. Is he gone again?

 

Blair Cottrell: Seems that way.

 

Joel Davis: The elusive Sewell. Yeah, I think ZOG have taken him out. You’ve taken out our boy. We’re gonna have to ride this one, the two of us.

 

Blair Cottrell: We have to keep marching forward, guys! We have to keep going. There’s going to be casualties.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, yeah, we’ve got to keep moving forward.

 

So I’m going to go through. I’m going to like unpack all the details to fill everybody in on some of the updates to the Parmindergate, if you will, and then we’ll do some analysis.

 

So this flyer came out. So there was a video which I will pull up in a second. And in the video Parminder Singh was Rod Caddie’s, the guy who runs One Nation WA, he got Parminder Singh on and said:

 

“There’s a lot of people online that are spreading all this misinformation saying that Parminder Singh is pro-immigration. And I’ve got him here to say that no, he’s not got those views.”

 

And basically Parminder Singh just more or less said:

 

“I read all the One Nation policies on Pauline Hanson’s website and I agree with the policies.”

 

He didn’t actually like articulate anything specific about him agreeing with those policies or why he agrees with those policies, which kind of gives itself to the accusation that he’s a grifter, basically. That he’s identified One Nation as the biggest party that is stupid enough to give him the nomination.

 

Because if he tried to rock up to the Liberals or whatever and throw around his curry shop money, it wouldn’t go very far. The Liberals are getting that big like jew money coming in from the property developer jews and the banks and all the rest of it. So they wouldn’t be interested. He doesn’t have that kind of high roller money.

 

If he went to the Labor Party. Well, the Labor Party they would run Indians, but they’ll run Indians that can speak English properly, that have been to university. They’re actually a serious professional political outfit to a degree.

 

And so I don’t know how big the Greens are at WA but again, they’re going to run people that actually are ideologically competent. This guy can barely string three sentences together that make any sense. Like he has like a really superficial understanding. He’s probably got like an 80, 80 to 85 IQ. Like he’s not smart, he’s not well educated, he’s not a good speaker. And so anyway, the next option then is One Nation. That’s the fourth biggest party. And he’s obviously bought his way in. There’s a it’s alleged that he made a twenty thousand dollar donation which sounds like nothing. If that’s all it costs to buy your way into One Nation maybe we should try and like do a GoFundMe to like buy the nomination for Blair or something! [chuckling] Because we could crowdfund that from you guys in like two days.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they wouldn’t take it. They’re too concerned about optics to take me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re too concerned about optics to take you. A well spoken White Australian that people actually like that’s actually a nationalist, but they will take some fat hairy Sikh that can barely speak English correctly and can barely articulate what policies he supports.

 

Anyway, he put out this document here. It says down the bottom authorized by Parminder Singh.

 

 

So this is put out on behalf of One Nation from his office and it says here:

 

“We want One Nation not a divided nation.”

 

And the key beliefs:

 

“Key belief one, support for immigrants.”

 

You know, immigrants are great basically:

 

“Key belief two, balanced immigration. One Nation is not anti-immigration but we recognise allowing too many people in too quickly constrained services.”

 

This is a really big watering down of One Nation’s policies from:

 

“Immigration is causing a housing crisis. We need to cut it down to Net Zero.”

 

Like when Pauline first got elected to Parliament she gave a speech saying:

 

“We’re in danger of getting flooded by Asians. We’re losing our culture.”

 

Now look at One Nation. They’re being cucked by some curry shop owner. Apparently as well, it says here:

 

“All the One Nation WA merchandise at events had a logo on the back that said Punjabi Properties. The logo is bigger than the One Nation logo. Ask anyone who attended the event in Mandurah November 9th. And the food at the event was curry supplied by Parminder Singh’s curry company or restaurant.”

 

 

So you go down to the One Nation rally. Look at all these White Boomers. They’re going down to the One Nation rally because you know there’s too many immigrants coming into this country and they want something done about it. And they get given their One Nation shirt with Punjabi Properties on the back and served curry!

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s [chuckling] bad!

 

Joel Davis: And then some fat Sikh gets up there and speaks in broken English and doesn’t even understand the policies of the party that he’s joined. That’s the state of One Nation! That’s the state of One Nation. I mean like it’s bad!

 

Blair Cottrell: Sad!

 

 

Joel Davis: This is levels of cuckservatism previously not thought possible. I mean it’s not even competent cuckservatism. It’s just embarrassing. What I said on my opinion piece was its actually more respectable if they were paid off to run this guy. It was purely a financial decision. If they thought this was a good idea on any metric, that’s actually more embarrassing than just being like shills. In my opinion, that’s how bad this guy is.

 

[1:06:03]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was just going to ask you a question. Do you think they’re foreseeing an increase in the Indian population and they want a piece of that they can see that a lot of that’s going to go towards either Liberal or Labor and the strategy is:

 

“We need a piece of the Indian voting bloc that’s going to be set up in Australia.”

 

Already is being set up in Australia by the other parties. Has it got something to do with that. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: It can’t be for the Indian voting block. They’re not that significant of a voting block. And the reality is, I mean we’ve done, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know man, there’s a lot of Indians in India. How many Indians are in India?

 

Joel Davis: But I’m talking about here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but they’re going to keep coming in. There’s going to be hundreds of thousands every few months. It’s going to end up being millions.

 

Joel Davis: One Nation’s supposed to be stopping them from coming in. Isn’t that the whole, …!

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re not! They must be thinking:

 

“Well they’re going to come anyway, we might capitalise on it anyway.”

 

Joel Davis: The majority of Indians, … They have done the studies. They vote Labor and then Labor are going and making deals saying:

 

“We’re going to bring in shitloads of Indians and we love Indians!”

 

And then Liberals come out and say:

 

“We love Indians just as much as Labor, actually!”

 

And they’re going and making deals with the Indians and so on.

 

So why is One Nation? Is it really think that it’s going to convince the Indian community:

 

“Hey, we’re the anti-immigration party that everyone calls racist and everyone in the party, everyone who votes for us are all like one White bogans.”

 

Or whatever according to the common, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Just trying to make sense of it.

 

Joel Davis: Vote for us instead! Like we’ve done the studies, we’ve gone through them on the show. Like the majority of Australians want immigration cut. They want immigration lowered, and they don’t have anyone to vote for basically except One Nation to do that.

 

So One Nation, if they sell themselves as the anti-immigration party. Well yeah, okay, Indians are coming in but over fucking 70% of voters are White! So selling “keep the Indians out to White voters” and WA has got a higher than 70% White ratio. I think it’s like almost 80% White. So trying to sell an anti-immigration message to White voters, people that actually vote for you, do you think that should be the priority? Not trying to market yourself to the 4% of the population that’s Indian that’s already voting for your political enemies that don’t like your policies anyway. That’s just fucking retarded politics! Like, it’s insane!

 

This is what I was saying before about like conservatives running to the centre to try and occupy the centre, but the centre escapes them. Like One Nation’s job is to run away from the centre and to stretch the discourse out, force the Liberals to justify themselves. Like the Liberals right now, the majority of Liberal voters want immigration cut, but the Liberals are avoiding the issue.

 

One Nation, if they did a proper anti-immigration campaign and sold themselves the true Right-wing party that’s going to shut down the borders, they’d get shitloads of votes that’d be very popular. But no, they want to try and prove how not racist they are by running some fat Indian. And he was the guy, by the way, we talked about on the show when Pauline went to the Sikh temple over in Perth. It was this guy’s Sikh temple. He organised all that. Pauline in that head scarf, turban thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: He must have given him more than 20 grand. It must have been more than 20 grand! He must have given him something else.

 

Joel Davis: I hope so, because it’s embarrassing, man! It’s embarrassing!

 

Blair Cottrell: It seems like he’s bought out the whole party. That’s what it seems like.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In WA at least. And people were saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not Pauline’s fault because it’s the WA wing of the party and they don’t control it.”

 

But it’s like that’s bullshit! She controls it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s her party. She’s ultimately in charge of everything that happens. She should just pull the pin on him. She should just pull the pin on him and say:

 

“Get rid of this guy. What’s he talking shit for about wanting more Indians? We’re against that. People are voting for us because we’re against that. Get rid of this guy!”

 

Why can’t you do that, Pauline? That’s what everyone’s waiting for.

 

Joel Davis: The party’s literally called Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Like her name’s in the name of the party. Like, you know what I mean?

 

Anyway, I’ll pull this video up for everyone’s viewing benefit. This is what I was describing before. This is that Rod Caddies joke who runs WA One Nation. A lot of nationalists have spoken to me privately, by the way, who were involved in Western Australian One Nation and they hate this guy. Like, this guy and others involved have been advocating for moderating and cucking for years. And alienating a lot of the true nationalists in the party over there. Cucking to the Aboriginals, now cucking to the jeets. I mean it’s embarrassing! But anyway, I’ll play this for everyone’s benefit.

 

 

Rod Caddies: Hey guys, just wanted to jump on here and have a chat with Parminder. I mean there’s been a few things put around on social media lately about immigration and how Parminder wants to flood our country with Indians and I know for a fact that’s not true, but I wanted to show you guys and let you have a listen to Parminder for himself and where he stands with One Nation and immigration.

Parminder: So hi everyone. Before I joined the One Nation party, I read the all policies, whatever the Pauline stand for and I fully support the Net Zero the immigration policy. And if some people lucky enough to come here, I request all those people that respect the Australian culture, Australian values and Australian constitution. And the English is my third language. So and I try to make a videos, that’s why it’s a little bit like I think in my own language first, then I speak in English. So that’s why it’s bit slow. So I [word unclear] One Nation policies.

Rod Caddies: So there you have it.

 

[1:11:50]

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! I mean he just said something I’ve always said and it’s something. Hang on one minute, I’ve got music playing and I shouldn’t have music playing, stupid. I’ve always said that you’ve got to be careful when dealing with foreign people because even though they may learn your language and churn out sentences in some form of your language, they’re thinking in their own language and they have words and phrases for things that we don’t even conceptualise often, especially if they come from a more mercantile, ruthless kind of society and culture. So he just basically admitted that in that video. He’s like:

 

“I’m thinking in my own language but then I’m speaking in yours. So what I’m actually thinking, who knows? You’ve just got to trust me guys!”

 

That’s [chuckling] pretty heavy stuff.

 

Joel Davis: The excuse that he used is that he’s incapable of articulating his true beliefs correctly because he can’t speak English properly. How does that qualify you to be a politician in Australia if you’re incapable of articulating yourself correctly in the language that Australians speak? That’s immediately disqualifying, immediately! Like it’s ridiculous!

 

But secondarily what he said there, like the grammar’s horrible, like “I supported the Pauline” and so on, like it’s embarrassing! But as he was describing, he’s like:

 

“I fully support the policies of One Nation.”

 

Now we’ve got all of these statements that he’s made that are contrary to those policies on immigration. So he’s changed his mind. Doesn’t he owe us an explanation for why he changed his mind? Because he’s acting like, as if, it’s not like he’s always had these views. He’s just signed up to this party that has different policies than what he’s advocated before in his public statements and his previous attempts at being an independent politician. So you would owe us an explanation for why you changed your mind and why we can trust you now.

 

But instead, what this was just like, wheel him out, say he agrees, tell everyone to shut up, gaslight everyone, and then just block everyone on Twitter that’s saying the opposite. I mean, absolute PR disaster for One Nation! Good work to all the boys putting pressure on. I tried to do my bit to force this kind of reaction. And then what we saw today, and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! And that video, let me interject quickly, is a direct response to the pressure you guys have been putting on these people. So it goes to show how influential we are as a community. They have to play ball with us because we are the people who vote for One Nation. We used to be anyway, people watching this video, that was supposed to be the Nationalist Party. So good effort for everyone or good effort by everyone putting the pressure on as a result of this stupid decision.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see a Superchat from Ukrainian groiper saying, “Naan Nation”*. That’s pretty funny.

 

[* Naan (Asian flatbread) Naan is a leavened, oven-baked or tawa-fried flatbread, that can also be baked in a tandoor. It is characterised by a light and fluffy texture and golden-brown spots from the baking process. Naan is found in the cuisines of Iran, Central Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Caribbean. Composed of White or wheat flour and combined with a leavening agent, typically yeast, naan dough develops air pockets that contribute to its fluffy and soft texture.]

 

But anyway, so this is the article in The Noticer just dropped just before we went live:

 

“Western Australia’s only One Nation MP suddenly quits the party.”

 

This is Ben Dawkins. He presumably joined the One Nation party to keep the likes of Parminder out of the country. Like that’s the whole point of One Nation. It’s an anti-immigration party.

 

 

https://www.noticer.news/ben-Dawkins-quits-one-nation-western-Australia/

 

Anyway:

 

“He’s been a member for the southwest region since March 2023 and is according to The Noticer, pro-freedom and anti-woke. He formally tended his resignation from Pauline Hanson’s party on Tuesday, saying on Thursday that he made the decision ‘reluctantly’. His resignation comes amid controversy over One Nation selection of Sikh businessman Parminder Singh as the third Upper House candidate in Western Australia due to his support for mass immigration from India.”

 

And this is like the original video. By the way. Go check out this article on the Noticer dot News. It’s the number one article at the moment because he just got put out.

 

And then you can watch this video by What’s News here where he interviews Parminder Singh on the phone and you can hear for yourself of what he said. The quotes here from Mr. Dawkins:

 

“I hold Pauline Hanson in high regard as a courageous advocate for everyday Australians. Indeed, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation should be the party with the guts to say what you’re thinking. As an independent candidate, I will continue to have the courage to speak for those who feel unheard.”

 

Blah, blah, blah. Who’s obviously amicably leaving the party. But the fact that he’s decided to quit right now, I mean, what other reason could it possibly be? Surely he’s quitting because of this. Surely this is the final straw. What do you think Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: All we can do is speculate about that. I’m sure I don’t know the man, I can’t speak to his motivations.

 

[1:16:26]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Someone says here:

 

“Joel, with all due respect, this is like saying that a dog owes us an explanation for chewing issues. He’s a fresh off the boat jeet. There isn’t any explanation. He couldn’t articulate one in English regardless.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, what I was articulating.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t care about his explanation. We want an explanation from Pauline Hanson. What’s going on with the party?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re supposed to represent the Australian people. That’s what we’re waiting for.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like how are you going to keep immigrants out of Australia if you can’t even keep them out of your own party? I mean, it’s pretty basic.

 

But keep the pressure up, all of you on Twitter. Every time Pauline Hanson tweets, Malcolm Roberts tweets, any of these other One Nation accounts from anywhere in the country, get in the replies, post the links to all this stuff, keep the pressure up, keep asking the question and just keep making it a nuisance for them because they need to, as you said, they owe us an explanation. We are nationalism in this country. You need to explain yourself to us!

 

I saw some rumours coming out that the Libertarian Party’s immigration platform is not going to be too crash hot. Then I asked some people that I knew in those circles and they said:

 

“No, actually it’s going to be better than he says.”

 

Or whatever. I said:

 

“You guys have to get your immigration policy together and you need to come out and you need to explain to us nationalists why it’s better than One Nation’s.”

 

And they said:

 

“Yeah, we’re going to do that.”

 

So we’ll see if they cuck or don’t cuck. We’ll cover it live. We’ll break it down. Will they end up bringing out a policy better than one nations? I don’t know. I’m sceptical. They’ve got elements in the party that seem not to care as much about immigration as an issue as others. We will see who wins out. We’ll see when the formal policy comes, comes forward.

 

But you know, One Nation’s in danger here. If the Libertarians put out a good immigration policy that’s better than theirs, they’re going to steal their votes off them and deservedly. So and if the Libertarians don’t put out a good immigration policy, I’m not going to advocate for voting for One Nation while they’re running these jeets. There’s no fucking way, there’s no fucking way! I’m going to be telling all of our audience to not vote. If our vote has to be earned. And at the moment, none of these Jokers are earning it. Like, none of them are taking this issue, even like a quarter of percent seriously compared to what they should be taking it. This is an existential issue. Our nation is being destroyed. And it’s also the number one issue destroying the average Australian’s quality of life. The housing crisis, wage stagnation, et cetera. Immigration is being rammed down the throat of this country by big business interests, big corporate interests, big finance interests, so that they can keep making ridiculous profits while in an economy that’s faltering. We’ve been in a per capita recession every quarter for the last, you know, two years basically. Australia’s fucking! Everything is getting worse on every level and immigration is the reason why.

 

So the average Joe on the street definitely wants the border shut down, definitely wants something done.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about those people who are saying:

 

“No, it’s not immigration, it’s landlords putting up property prices. It’s capitalism, it’s greedy capitalists, that’s what’s destroying Australia!”

 

How do you respond to that? It’s not immigrants, it’s capitalists!

 

Joel Davis: Well, the way that I would respond to that is simple.

 

Number one, these big capitalist lobby groups, like the property developer lobby, the finance lobby, the big corporate industry lobbies, they ask the government, they fund the political campaigns of the major parties and they demand higher immigration. Their public representatives that they pay to come and advocate for their interests want more immigration.

 

So when they say it’s not immigration, it’s the capitalists, it’s like, well the big capitalists are the ones that are deciding that they want the immigration. So you can’t actually divide the two things from one another. This is ridiculous! Like the capitalists are telling us immigration is good for them, so it must be good for them.

 

And if you have a Marxist worldview where you believe that the capitalists make profits under the exploitation of the working class, well everything the capitalists do driven by that profit motive must be to exploit the working class, including the fact that they’re pumping all this money into politics to keep immigration high, against the public will. Because it’s not the Democratic will. We’ve seen the polls, we’ve gone through them on the show every time they do one, every time they do a poll on immigration is wildly unpopular. So liberal and Labor don’t have the immigration policies they do because of what their voters want. They have it because it’s what their donors want. And their donors are the big capitalists. So it’s just a complete non-starter of an argument.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would it be fair to say that shutting down discussion on immigration on the grounds that it’s “racist” is protecting the profits of the capitalists?

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely! 100%! It’s not even in question.

 

Blair Cottrell: That really throws a spanner in the works, doesn’t it? I wonder what came first, the chicken or the egg? Did the capitalists dream up this whole anti-racist movement and use it to usher in this new slave class that’s going to live in smaller spaces, work long hours and for less, like for lower wages? Or have they just kind of adjusted themselves to that culture that already established itself as a result of subversion? I would lean towards the second scenario.

 

[1:22:10]

 

Joel Davis: I think it almost doesn’t really matter! What matters from our standpoint is going to Leftists and saying:

 

“You claim to be against capitalism, yet the social values that you put forward are the social values of the big capitalists.”

 

The big capitalists are fine with gay marriage and they support transgenderism and they support mass immigration and all the rest of it. They support political correctness, they support wokeness.

 

So if they support all of those things, clearly all of those things are compatible with capitalism. Clearly all of those things are beneficial to capitalist power. Otherwise why would they support them? And we can actually explain why they benefit from capitalist power. Because what those things do is they destroy the fabric of the nation, they destroy national loyalty, they destroy patriotism.

 

And that’s why Leftists attacked them. Because Leftists decided after World War II that, well, probably earlier, but they particularly decided this after World War II, that nationalism was their main enemy. Nationalism, National Socialism, fascism, that whole suite of ideas, that’s their main enemy. And that was more important, fighting that was more important to them than advocating for the working class.

 

In fact, a lot of Leftist theorists said:

 

“Well, the White working class betrayed us because they supported National Socialism and fascism. So fuck the White working class! We’re going to replace them with a brown and black working class and a gay working class and so on, that will support communism.”

 

So they made the decision that destroying nationalism was more important than destroying capitalism. And capitalists then looked at the world and said:

 

“You know what? The biggest threat to us actually isn’t communism, its nationalism.”

 

And you can see that in World War II. Because in World War II the Liberal capitalist West allied with the Soviet Union to destroy National Socialist Germany. So clearly they made a decision then that they were more threatened by National Socialism than Communism, otherwise they wouldn’t have allied with one against the other. That’s just a brute fact of history that communists and Leftists cannot argue away. That’s reality.

 

[Capitalism and Communism are both jewish systems so their co-operation, both overtly or covertly, is natural-K]

 

Then they then set upon systematically funding and supporting the destruction of nationalism and anything approximating nationalism in every Western country under their control.

 

So why would capitalists want to do this? Well, nationalism is the greatest threat to an international market system because nationalists, when they come to power and they take over the government, they go and look at what’s happening in international markets and they say:

 

“Well, hey, wait a second, this capitalist over here is making a profit at the expense of my nation. He’s taken jobs to other countries, he’s importing goods from other countries and he’s doing all of these things that are good for him to make extra profits, but they’re actually bad for the strength of my nation. And so I’m going to start creating all these laws that protect local industries, keep wealth and resources in my country to build up the national strength, make sure there’s good jobs for my people.”

 

But international finance, they didn’t want to do that because at the end of the post-war globalisation that we’ve had, they wanted to go and exploit the cheap slave labour in China and other foreign third world countries and then import all that cheap crap into the West and sell it to us. And they took away all the manufacturing jobs.

 

Like back in the 1960s or the 1970s, over 30% of Australia’s economy was manufacturing. We used to make cars, we used to make computers, we used to make everything here. Now it’s only 6% of the economy, we make nothing here. And that’s one of the reasons why people are doing it tough. Because there isn’t good quality jobs for the working class anymore, because they sent all those jobs to foreign countries.

 

And the people that would stop that are nationalists, which is why they attack the White Australia Policy, which is why they attack nationalism, which is why they attack your identity. Because they don’t want White Australians supporting a political leader that’s loyal to them before he’s loyal to big business. All the biggest companies in this country, the top 20 countries, sorry, the top 20 companies in Australia are majority foreign owned. It’s all Wall Street, jewish banking firms and shit that own all of our shit! Like all of our shit has been sold to all these like foreign interests. Our country has been completely sold off. All the jobs have been shipped offshore. We had so much wealth in this country. We were one of the wealthiest countries per capita in the entire world. So much has been shipped overseas to the benefit of large corporate interests at your expense.

 

And if you had leaders that were nationalists like they used to be before World War II in Australia, who put White Australian people first, they wouldn’t have let that happen.

 

So that’s why they had to destroy that ideology to facilitate this. That’s what international finance wanted and that’s why the world that is run by international finance, these big capitalists, attack people like us and our ideas hard rather than the Left. They fear them less than us because we are the true enemy. And the Left is complicit. The Left attacks us harder than it attacks them even though they have the power and we don’t. So their entire worldview is bullshit! They’re complete frauds!

 

Blair Cottrell: What you seem to be saying there is the Left are larping as class communists, like they’re not actually against the bourgeoisie or the rich. They’re actually race communists, like race and race hate, punishing White people is at the centre of all of their politics.

 

[1:27:31]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yes! Yes, they care more. And we see this in their revealed preference. They care more about attacking us than they care about attacking capitalist power. Why is the Left, their number one focus is anti-fascism. Why isn’t anti-capitalism? Why aren’t they going after the enemy in a serious way? Because number one, that’s hard. Because you’re going after the people that are actually powerful! That’s what we do. And we get locked up in jail and we get dragged through courts and horrible things happen to us. People get fired from their jobs. When you go after the real power, real power goes after you!

 

Blair Cottrell: No bank accounts, no monetisation, no Patreon, no YouTube.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The only time the Left do anything that really goes after the power, serious power, is when they go after Israel.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And then they feel some consequences finally, for the first time in their lives.

 

Joel Davis: The only time they feel any consequences. And that also proves the other aspect of what we say, which is that capitalism is jewish! The capitalist elite, a lot of them are fucking jews!

 

And if you look at the history of capitalism, capitalism was developed, the entire logic and structure of capitalism was developed by basically jewish practices subverting medieval European society. We talked about this on the show a few weeks ago. Werner Sombart’s work, the book is called jews and Modern Capitalism. And Werner Sombert wasn’t just any old anti-semite or something. Werner Sombart was the greatest theorist of the German historical School of historical economics in the late 19th and early 20th century. He was a genius! He was a genius!

 

And as he was writing his work, basically trying to articulate the whole history of capitalism, how it came into existence and why, he realised that the jews played such an important role that he had to write a completely separate book just on the jews and their involvement in the development of capitalism. And in that book he describes how in medieval Europe, merchants had a completely different ethos.

 

So if you were a merchant in medieval Europe and you went out into the public square and you started praising your wares and talking about how great the stuff at your shop is and how low your prices are and all this kind of stuff, that was considered immoral. If you tried to get customers off the other shop owners, that was considered immoral. If you charge a different price than the other merchants, if you tried to like sell your stuff extra cheap, that was considered immoral. Everything had a set price. You sell it at that price. You don’t big up your goods. You are a Christian. The people who made it are Christians. Everyone should just trust that the quality is there, that’s that! There’s no Hoodwinking, there’s no marketing, there’s no manipulation that was permitted. There’s basically, it was just a fair, equitable system and it was completely mediated through charitable, good faith Aryan society.

 

Then the jews come in and the jews will come in, they’ll get. Jews had international networks. They they’re an “international clique” as Hitler described. They would be involved, particularly in early colonisation. They were going after the gold mines and the silver mines and stuff over in South America. But they were very involved in these international trade networks also all the trade networks that ran through the Middle East into Europe as well. And they were an international ethnicity, every other ethnic group was in one location. The jews had people everywhere.

 

So the jews could use the fact that they were one international group to build all these relationships with the other jewish merchants all around the world and to facilitate international trade.

 

And then, as a result, they could then import goods and bring them into your community and sell them cheaper than the stuff made in your local community. And they didn’t have laws against that kind of stuff back then or any kind of regulations back then, because it was an honour system.

 

And so they’d come in and they would sell stuff at half the price, and they’d destroy local industries. They’d be haggling people on the street trying to sell stuff. They’d be advertising their goods. This is why the jews took over the media, because the jews were the first people to get into advertising. It was considered immoral to advertise for Aryans. But jews didn’t have any issue with advertising.

 

And so they then got into that industry. And that the advertising industry is the backbone of the printing, you know, print media. Print media makes a lot of money off the advertising on the papers, in the newspaper. So as newspapers were invented in the early 18th century and widely distributed, jews played a leading role in financing a lot of that, because jewish merchants would advertise through those.

 

And then that gave them a lot of control over media and therefore public perception. But jews innovated in these industries, and so they were able to undercut the opposition. That’s why jews are getting kicked out of all these different cities and countries all across Europe all the time, because they would come in with their investment practices and destroy the livelihoods of local industries and local merchants, completely upset the whole apple cart of the local community. And eventually there would be enough public resentment that they’d run them out of the city and demand that they’d be kicked out of the city. And then they go to the next city and they do the same thing and so on. And the process kept repeating.

 

But eventually they were able to become normalised in Europe because they made so many deals with elite political actors and traitors that got in bed with these jewish merchants and were making a quick buck.

 

[1:33:18]

 

And I’m not even talking about usurious lending as well, which is a whole other aspect of this, that eventually jewish mercantile behaviour became normalised. And now it’s considered normal to have advertising. Now it’s considered normal to try and undercut and compete with other firms and try and sell things cheaper and import goods from all over the world.

 

And instead of like buying things from like local producers and you know, we’ve got this completely globalised, marketized, corporatized, consumerized society.

 

Now this all came from originally the impact of the jewish mentality and jewish culture on Aryan Middle Ages Europe. Without that maybe we wouldn’t live in this fucking shitscape. So capitalism is fundamentally and inherently jewish in a certain way. You could argue according to Sombard’s theories, which I think are really compelling, the history that he describes in that book.

 

But then secondarily we can see that jews are very, up to this day. Like I’ve talked about on the show before, how look at the property development industry which is a massive supporter of mass immigration because more immigrants means more demand for property. So they can build more high rise fucking ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] slave high rise apartments and sell them for you 800 grand a pop like in some overcrowded part of like inner city Sydney or Melbourne or something. And a bunch of Asians and pajeets will buy them or want to rent them or whatever. And that’s a great business model for them. It doesn’t do anything for our country, it just clutters our cities, makes traffic worse, depresses wages with cheap labour and so on, but drives up the price of rent and all this kind of stuff. But for them it’s great! They’re making millions, they’re making billions.

 

And the biggest property developer in Australia is Harry Triguboff. The jew. And the jews have always been instrumental in high rise development in this country because before World War II we didn’t allow high rise development in Australia because our culture said if we have all these high rise apartments in the cities, what this is going to encourage people to do is to move in there, move out of their parents home when they’re in their 20s, move into one of these apartments in the city and they’re not going to have children, they’re not going to get married, they’re going to start having frivolous sex, they’re going to start developing this kind of cosmopolitan Left-wing culture, they’re going to become basically soy Jack Reddit libtard types. We don’t want that! That’s happened in Europe and it’s created all these revolutionary communist movements and it’s been a mess in Europe. We don’t want that in Australia.

 

The Australian dream is going to be we’re going to have, everyone is going to have their own quarter acre block and have their own home that you can fit a family in. And they’re going to get married young, they’re going to have children and they’re going to have a dignified existence and you can go and work at the factory before we send the jobs overseas and you can earn enough to be able to support a wife and three kids and so on.

 

And that’s how we’re going to build our society. It’s going to be healthy. The tallest building in town is going to be the Church. Nothing’s going to be bigger than the Church. No high rise development. Everyone’s going to have a backyard, everyone’s going to be out, kids playing outside, healthy, blah blah, blah. That was the great Australian dream. And the jews came in after World War II, started building high rise developments. The first high rise developments were in the jew areas of Sydney and Melbourne, in Bondi, in St Kilda.

 

The places that still to this day are where the jews live. That’s where the first high rise developments were. And they got money from their international jewish finance buddies to finance them because they have the international networks that give them low interest loans to then build their high rise developments. And this is where the money for a lot of these wealthy jewish families that are now controlling our government came from is from setting up shop, basically subverting our society, building these high rise developments, developing these giant corporations that now control our government and are forcing immigrants down our throat. And these have been a lot of the money that’s been behind multiculturalism and so on has come from these developments and they’ve completely subverted Australian society.

 

Now we do have these cosmopolitan communist Leftists that are like they don’t have any children and so on and live in the inner cities and perpetuate this Left-wing ideology, just like it was predicted.

 

And so you can see like the same jewish infection of our society, kind of like what I described in medieval Europe has happened here to create this current problem.

 

But a lot of people don’t know understand this or know about this, but this is just history, this is just how it works. So you know, when we’re talking about the problems with capitalism, it’s not just an abstract idea, we’re talking about fucking jews!

 

So anyway, I went on a bit of a tangent there, but I thought it was important.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you sometimes do that. I tend to try to just let you go. But it was all very good stuff. That’s the thing. It’s a lot to unpack for the average person. But because people can go back and they can re-watch it, they can replay these little segments. I think it’s all really good stuff. I’ve got to jet. I’ve got some responsibilities to see to. But it’s been a great stream so far. You’re gonna stay with it Joel, I suppose, and, …

 

[1:38:26]

 

Joel Davis: No. We’ll end it there.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s okay. We can do some Superchats then. I can stick around for that, I suppose.

 

Joel Davis: All right. There’s not that many. Clever Name said:

 

“Never get to catch you live. The moustache needs a badge and some brutality to go with it. Solid 7 out of 10. Congrats on the little one.”

 

That’s obviously directed towards Tom. And I agree that Tom kind of has a cop physiognomy. Tom does kind of look like a cop in a way. Maybe in a healthy society, he would be a cop.

 

Blair Cottrell: Whoa, Are you talking about Thomas Sewell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Don’t you think he kind of looks like a cop?

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe with a moustache a little bit. But I always thought I could be a good cop if I was living in a society where that was feasible. Obviously, it’s not feasible now, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, seven years, … Cops that wear the aviators and …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you used to have to be a guy like me to be a cop. You have to be as big and as tall as me. They were like the basic physical standards to be a police officer because you had to command respect in the community. You had to be intimidating to a certain degree, but also respectable. So, like, my physiognomy was the one they used to go for. But now there’s all these equality you can’t discriminate, that kind of stuff.

 

So I wouldn’t last as a police officer because I wouldn’t be able to toe the line. I wouldn’t be swearing allegiance to feminism and the LGBT community. And so I’d quickly be shunned by the rest of the force.

 

But, yeah, once upon a time, I think I could have been a good cop.

 

Joel Davis: No, in a healthy society, yeah the NSN would be the cops and we’d keep the streets safe. You know, that story the other day of that fat nigger that raped that poor young girl, and they had the CCTV. I posted it, Noticer News posted as well, this fat, disgusting nigger!

 

And I think I said in the replies to when the mainstream news posted the video, looking for the suspect, I was like:

 

“Why the fuck do we have negroes in Australia? Like, why the fuck are they here?”

 

Like, if you just stop and think, like, take a step back.

 

Blair Cottrell: They are a bioweapon!

 

Joel Davis: Just think how ridiculous that is! Why the fuck are they here?

 

Blair Cottrell: They are bioweapons!

 

Joel Davis: Why did we build planes and boats and transport fucking savage rapist beasts halfway across the fucking world into our country? You know, give them like Centerlink bucks and like feed them full of KFC hormones and just let them roam the streets, like with no supervision, like not even putting them in a cage or anything! They can just roam the streets! It’s like, what next? Like chimpanzees, lions? What other wildlife are going to bring from Africa? I mean, it’s fucking insane!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no comment. We want to start with the Superchats. We’ve got a few from Rumble. We’ve got the Shogun 21. Thanks very much:

 

“Violence prevails when democracy fails.”

 

Said Molotov Solution:

 

“If you enjoy metal and are red pilled, they are a must listen.”

 

Oh, it must be a band, Molotov Solution.

 

All right, Molotov Solution. It sounds interesting. I’m actually I won’t talk about that.

 

Anyway, next is Ukrainian groiper, sends through 10 bucks. You went through that one already, “Naan Nation”. Yeah. And Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends through $10. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“I wonder if the face mask ban will cover people wearing Groucho Marx glasses as a disguise?”

 

Maybe, but they said one of the reasons given for banning the face masks was it was protecting people from capsicum spray, which I don’t think face masks do very well.

 

Joel Davis: No, they don’t work.

 

Blair Cottrell: You need to have like a full gas mask with like airtight goggles to protect your eyes. It burns your skin too. Like, so it’s not really. It incapacitates you. I’ve been hit by mace once at a fair distance too. And it doesn’t matter who you are, that stuff incapacitates you for 10 minutes.

 

Joel Davis: If you have good goggles, you can deal with it. Like it’s kind of real spicy and that’s not great! But, excuse me. [coughing] Thinking of capsicum spray just like fucked me up then.

 

But if you have good goggles that keep it out of your eyes, it’s tolerable. It’s tolerable. It’s like eating like fuck loads of chilies or something. Like, if it gets in your nose or whatever, unless you get like straight in your mouth or something, then obviously.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you like spicy food, Joel? Do you like spicy food? Is that your thing?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, to an extent, but I’m not like, crazy about it. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: I love the stuff.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t look like he sort of guy who would like spicy food, but I can’t get enough of it. Makes me salivate just thinking about spicy food.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not a huge fan of the Indian, maybe it’s just I’m so racist. I can’t bring myself to enjoy Indian food, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t eat Indian. Indian curries are just created to disguise the fact that the meat is off and really poor quality. That’s why Indians curried their food. They didn’t have refrigeration for a long time. So Indian cuisine is just rotten, poor quality food mixed in slop to disguise how bad it actually is. Like, I don’t know why people go to Indian restaurants. The fact that Indian restaurants even exist is ridiculous! I don’t know.

 

[1:43:55]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean first of all, the premise, an Indian is going to cook you dinner? Doesn’t matter what they’re making, that’s fucked! Anyway, Mexican food. I don’t mind the burrito, but from what I understand the burrito that as we understand it, is actually an American invention that’s White people improving Mexican cuisine and like upgrading it from, like, schlop to something like, actually edible.

 

So that’s not really a Mexican thing. It’s like fake Mexican. Tex Mex. I think it’s Texan. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Aussie autist 88 sends through five bucks. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“Happy midsummer. It’s two days time.”

 

Oh, someone knows. I won’t divulge anything about that. There’s nothing crazy going on. It’s just like a little private Christmas party.

 

But yeah, you guys might see some photos of that after the fact. We’ll see.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, Midsummer’s good to celebrate. We don’t celebrate it properly in Australia because unlike the Europeans, it’s like so close to Christmas where the Europeans is like the opposite side of the year.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. Hang on, isn’t Midsummer that movie. Is that the name of the movie?

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure there’s a movie called Midsummer I can’t think of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I was thinking of the direct Shakespeare’s, …

 

Joel Davis: The Midsummer’s Night Dream. That’s like a play.

 

Blair Cottrell: No. Okay, well I was thinking of our Christmas party in two days time which has a Midsummer dress theme. I might as well just give it away now.

 

Joel Davis: Dude OPSEC! OPSEC [Operations Security]! We can’t be divulging our private, … On our online show.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s just a dress code. [chuckling] Who cares like whatever. I hope we get some photos.

 

Joel Davis: We don’t. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just excited about it. I’ve already bought my get up and I’m excited!

 

Joel Davis: Why don’t we like go through our criminal records again on stream? And go through all the horrible things, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well okay, where do I begin? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] And then on Odysee I got a Superchat from Clever Name. Oh no, I already read that one. On Entropy I’ve got a Superchat from the Gump. He said:

 

“White people need to start to favour our own kind in business. That’s the only way to generate and keep resources in our group interests. Big contracts, fundings, positions. They all have diversity requirements to weaken us.”

 

Well I agree with that. Insofar as you can do business with Whites and work with Whites and so on, you always should. You absolutely should! And I think that’s quite clear and obvious a good thing to do. Personally I hate working with non-Whites, and your goal should be to work with them as little as possible, and if possible not at all do business with them. Not at all if you can. But I understand that a lot of industries it’s unavoidable so it is what it is for some people. But that should be your objective.

 

But also yeah like if you can source your produce from like local farmers, if you can get milk from local farmers, eggs from local farmers, etc. Meat is like not only is it going to be high quality and better for you, better for your health but also that’s so much better than going down to like you know the ZOG options of Woolies or Coles and like dumping your money into some foreign jew owned you know megacorp that is importing half the from overseas and injecting the other half of the with fucked up hormones that are bad for your health and screwing over Australian farmers etc. Etc. So yeah definitely always try and do your business locally and within the race.

 

But I think that’s more or less all the Superchats.

 

So thanks for watching the show this evening. It’s been a good chill stream. Unfortunately, Tom. Yeah suffered ZOG DDoS attacks and they took him out. They took out our boy. So RIP to the big man!

 

But I think next week we’ll figure out whatever was wrong there. We’ll fix that up. Hersant [Jacob] should have his setup sorted as well. He was supposed to be on tonight, but then some things came up.

 

So we’re gonna have Hersant and Tom on more again in the future, like it used to be. Well, Hersant’s been on a few times, but Tom used to be on more regularly. I do like doing the show when it’s like three or four of us a bit more because it’s kind of like often we cook up like a more intense conversation sometimes. What do you think?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it was pretty intense. Oh, well, it wasn’t as intense as some of our conversations, but we’re building on it.

 

Joel Davis: Some of the best shows, when we go up on tangents for like an hour. That’s some of the best content in my opinion.

 

[1:48:58]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, people watch the show in the background a lot of the time. The benefit of long streams is you can put them on while you’re doing other stuff. So people sometimes only catch glimpses of what you’re talking about, then they go back to it later if they’re really interested.

 

And that’s the point of these shows. It’s to kind of replace your standard television programme so you’re not being brainwashed by bad propaganda. You’re getting the good kind of propaganda from us. Because whatever you’re going to watch, it’s propaganda to some degree. Whatever you expose yourself to in the realm of entertainment information, it’s always propaganda to some degree. So choose the Right propaganda and you’ll know it’s the Right propaganda if you start if your life starts improving. I think like, one way to gauge the quality of the content you’re exposing yourself to is how your health shifts or develops or declines over time. Like, if you start watching a new type of political, ideological content, you get into that kind of thing, you’re into it for a few years. Compare the way you look and feel. Compare your physical health and your mental health to where you were three years prior, before you were into that stuff. If it’s worse, it’s probably shit for you. If it’s better, it’s good for you! And I seem to be getting healthier. So nationalism is good for you guys. Take my word for it.

 

I don’t know if I’m making no sense there. I’m getting to the point where I’m getting really drowsy.

 

But it’s been a good show, guys. Thanks for joining us.

 

Joel Davis: Before you go, that Ben Dawkins, who just quit the One Nation Party in WA, he just tweeted:

 

“I’ve been following some of the fallout from Parminder social media, but my press release says what I’m saying on my resignation from Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. I’ll post it tomorrow.”

 

So the fact that he mentioned it means it’s probably something to do with that. We’ll see tomorrow what comes out.

 

But yeah, keep up the pressure. Parmindergate has only just begun! Keep the pressure up on One Nation. If you’re not on Twitter, make a Twitter account. I’ve said this the whole time on this show. There’s a way to do online activism. You can make an impact online because everyone who’s speced into politics, works in politics, is in political media. They’re all on Twitter. If you can push narratives and direct conversations on Twitter, you can actually create an effect in actual politics if you do it effectively and aggressively with a big enough group. So get on there, help support the initiatives. And yeah, should be a Merry Christmas to everyone.

 

By the way, I know we’re still a few days out, but we probably won’t do another show until after Christmas. Maybe we will, maybe we won’t. Probably not. It’s a lot on, a lot of stuff with the community, with family and stuff I got to do personally. And that’s what you should be doing this time of year. Hopefully people have got time off work and you can spend it with your close friends, with your family in particular. And tis the season. Enjoy yourselves and we love you all. We’ll see you all in the next episode. And White fucking Power!

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[1:52:15]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/1/2026 = 63)

akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 day ago
You must worship the JEW, or you are a national security threat.
2
0

Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
The aesthetic argument against terrorism is very true! It doesn’t all have to surround logic or false logic, but cool or not cool, gay or not gay.

XYZezima
1 year ago
Know what sucks? I can’t shit right now. I’m sitting here with a log that is apparently just too wide to pass. It’s honestly stressing me out. Why the fuck do we have all these weird health problems? My body can’t even regulate the size of its own turds and now I’m going to have to go to the hospital or die of a blockage. It’s not even funny, this honestly sucks. I am barely 30, I don’t smoke, drink maybe two times a year, diet could be better but I always feel like shit. Fuck I hate this world. Went and bought a little bottle of milk, it had 21g of sugar. 21g of fucking sugar for some 2% darigold milk. The chocolate milk had as much sugar as a Pepsi, almost 50g. Insane. Absolutely insane to pump us full of so much sugar. And now I can’t even shit. You guys understand I’m sitting here and I’m going to die from a prolapsed asshole (look it up, not a joke) and my cats are going to eat my fucking body. These jews got my body to sabotage itself, choking on its own shit. .. I hate this world.

BuckinghamPhallus
1 year ago
ON being run by a retarded fat bastard versus the polished opposition Indian bastards is part of the ruse. if you’re talking about “your” Indian you’re not talking about why he is even fucking there. brilliant movement of Overton window

masklophobix
1 year ago
Can Joel please just spend 80 bucks on a webcam already?? Potato-vision needs to go.

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I understand you are Australians, but if you want to attract the attention of a wider audience, you need to focus on broader issues. Just a friendly advice.

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Gay

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I like how the neurotic harpy excludes specifically White MEN from her “discrimination” and “racist” list. “Laws” legitimize the state employees to use violence against you, physical violence. That’s what “Laws” are.

Motion937
1 year ago
Balaclavas would be totally acceptable to them if it were only left-wing activists wearing them.
1
0

kitsubot
VerifiedSupporter
1 year ago
Banning face masks at protests? Lets see them ban makeup – u can use face paint to obfuscate ur identity too
3
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
1 year ago
Ban left wing activists & politicians.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
EMJ addressing similair themes; https://rumble.com/v62kcve-chicago-talk-show-host-emj-interview-5-translate-hate-the-catholic-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas Joel. Don’t let the bastards get you down.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas https://rumble.com/v5zbhph-the-xmas-song-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Xmas larf

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
‘JEWS HATE FREEDOM’. That is a great op when you objectively look at the power these cunts are abusing in parliament in Victoria. Well done Joel & lads.

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Melb- Canberra-DC-City of London

fdgrdfg
1 year ago
55:25 So India’s population in 1858 year was 203.000.000 of Indians and 20.000 British soldiers conquered them? That’s like 1:10000 ratio wtf.

BradC1988
1 year ago
White Fucking Power! o/
2
0

Rumbolinawave321
1 year ago
It’s a simple question How many immigrants are India taking? And if they aren’t taking any, why is it so?
3
0

newgerman
1 year ago
Talking about terrorism as she did without a peep about Israeli massacres.. then mentioning “anti-Semitism”… GOD IT IS FUCKING ENRAGING!!!!!
3
0

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
…nice shiner, btw

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
I heard this saying once, “In youth, wisdom and beauty is rare”. I think that this applies to you Joel. I am always impressed by your deep insight into such a wide array of subjects, fringed with a decent sense of humour, for someone so young. Always stay humble and hold fast. Thanks, from a Canadian. Blair and Tom are equally interesting to listen to. You men all seem to embody the spirit of our common gentlemanly ancestry with your decorum and manners.
2
0

Bumble_Bee
1 year ago
Anders Breivik, JDL confederate shoots up a bunch of boycott Israel Labor supporters on an island after the U.N voted to give Palestine a spot in the E.U parliament…. Brenton Tarrant the very year of the Pandemic did a hollywood style performance art that mirrors Wendy Scur’s account at Port Aurthur in which not only was there a ammo mag left in the hallway as Brenton Enters, the bodies laying by the chairs move by the time Brenton re-enters the mosque… All the bodies were not ripped apart by high velocity rounds nor at point blank range…also, Firearms experts show that nato rounds will go right through walls and produce smoke in enclosed spaces like that, Brenton was using an airgun and those “Muslims” were actors and the whole operation was a Mossad public relations excercise…. all in time for the pandemic…. which I’m sure they knew was coming… because Trump went to China and what a perfect place in China’s corrupt and disorganized system to launch a controlled release of a virus…(even it was even a virus since they’ve never isolated it nor shown what “covid 19″ actually is”

› Show 1 reply
FJB6666
1 year ago
Again. FFS. Joel your a LEGEND. I love your rants. They are the best..
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Joel, your a LEGEND. I love your rants. There the best.
7
0

Pincermovement
1 year ago
Go black face
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Thomas should shorten his moustache, he’s needs the Adolf look.
6
0

LordVividColours
1 year ago
Blair was for sure on to something when he was talking about choosing the right propaganda to consume I became a nationalist about 2 years ago and in that time I quit smoking weed & tobacco, I stopped being a total degenerate, I got more & more active, I learned to see the bad propaganda clearly, I lost a shit tonne of weight and slowly my life has more meaning giving me more drive to actually have a life instead of an existence. I’d rather kill myself than go back to the way I was
23
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
UncircumcisedCircus
1 year ago
The system relies on people being doped up/down for people to not notice. The more sober I have been the easier it was to see through the lies.
4
0

newgerman
1 year ago
good for you man
2
0

MadHatterAU
1 year ago
Les Dawson could model that face on churches as a gargoyle.

› Show 1 reply
jjbeez57
1 year ago
Elephant in the living room…. Tom’s moustache looks gay. Sorry to say this as the guy’s a legend, but the people around him need to let him know. Like the intervention of an alcoholic by friends and family, they do it because they love them.
0
2

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
The stream breaks up with Tom’s very contentious exam into the racial nature of souls. Coincidence? Australian disrupt law?

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter+
1 year ago
You have officially lost your freedom gentlemen.
0
3

ProvingNihil
1 year ago
Those laws for wearing face masks are ridiculous, they’re desperate at this point to find out our identity.
1
0

RoseRock444
Supporter
1 year ago
There is no such thing as a soul, Blair
1
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Soul from from Old English sawol from Old Norse sala from Proto-Germanic *saiwalō. “It has been suspected to have meant originally “coming from or belonging to the sea,” the supposed stopping place of the soul before birth or after death [Barnhart]; if so, it would be from Proto-Germanic *saiwaz (see sea). Klein explains this as “from the lake,” as a dwelling-place of souls in ancient northern Europe.” [etymonline source] Our soul is our “gene-lake” or “gene-pool”

bush_bash_boy
1 year ago
for an extremely smart fella, joel does the cause and himself, a disservice by talking about sensitive subjects, such as terrorism, and using words like “it’s gay” and “edge lord”. completely fine to say between mates, but it’s hard to take you serions when you talk like a troll.
8
7

‹ Hide 5 replies
EnglandAwake
1 year ago
Shut the fuck up with your unearned critiques.
6
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
HKeithVarange88
1 year ago
It was authoritative and humorous, don’t be a boomer
5
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
NaziGoering
1 year ago
He’s right. Joel talks like a troll because he thinks it sounds “edgey” but it’s just cringey.
5
2

‹ Hide 2 replies
whitehonkymonkey
1 year ago
agree, this podcast below , clearly states how hitler respected other cultures,yet preferred to separate. spoke about what was beneficial to germany and the messaging, he agreed with goebbels, talking down the others was of no benefit to the movement. why joel and some others fall for this denigration does not benefit the national socialist movement, if such people continue on this path,the jews win. comment below not aimed at you nazigoering. do as the fuhrer would do, FFS. yes your feeling a bit hurt by these comments, but please get on board we need to win over the masses. keep the denigration at home if you cant control it. be like the fuhrer. thank you. HH.https://rumble.com/v5jtq51-all-the-lies-you-have-been-told-about-hitler-part-1-x-space.html?playlist_id=watch-history
0
1
newgerman
1 year ago
This was an excellent WN discussion by the Three Aussi-teers. Where’s “Numero quatro”? Hope he’s not in jail or some shit. Above all, heartfelt congratulations on the upcoming baby, Mr. Sewell
1
0

LaborCorruptionCommission
1 year ago
Those guys are doing so much damage. Islam is the immediate problem. STFU and let their terrorism be front and centre. This shit just lets people be diverted to the Far Righht boogey man. IQ is not one of their qualities.
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Last comment I promise. But it seems like that fat jew cow on TV was talking directly to you guys. o/o/o/
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Jews always pass anti-“hate speech” laws right before they do a white genocide. It’s textbook for them, just like 9/11 and October 7th. It’s impressive how they have this shit down to a tee
9
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Main reference for this would be the Bolshevik Revolution, which I believe was simple a prototype of the worldwide cabal they intend to form. And they’ll mobilize their mud golems to carry it out against their white “oppressors” but I’m not worried because a few whites always crawl out of the ashes and rebuild. It’s just a condition of our existence to repeatedly overcome Jews and their golems.
4
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
“His terrorism was boring and gay” hahahahaha
2
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
I’m kind of surprised we still have a first and second amendment in USA at this point. It’s like the only based thing about living in this gay empire
2
1

Boonske
1 year ago
LIKE AND SHARE THE STREAM ITS THE LEAST YOU CAN DO
7
3

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript