Dean McIntosh: Hello there, guys. At the risk of sounding like every other YouTuber out there, I’d really appreciate it if you’d click the subscribe button. It’s free, it doesn’t cost you anything and it allows my channel to grow, which means guests like the one you’re about to watch, as well as more, would be willing to come on! Just give it a like, give it a subscribe and we’ll go from there.

 

All right, thank you and enjoy this episode.

 

So today on Laments, I’ve got Mr. Mark Collett. Mark, how are you doing?

 

Mark Collett: Hello, my friend. It’s good to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me on. I’m looking forward to having a decent chat with you.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, thank you.

 

Now, for those that don’t know who you are, if they were to Google you get some quite derogatory terms come up. People call you, I saw “Hitler Simp” when I was doing my research. I think simping is something to do with OnlyFans girls. I don’t know, I’m a bit old for all that shit! The neo-Nazi, Nazi. How would you describe yourself?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I describe myself as an ethno-nationalist. I’ve always described myself as a nationalist.

 

But now there seems to be sort of two camps. You have the sort of civic nationalists and you have the ethno-nationalists. I’m an ethno-nationalist. I am English, I’m proud to be English. And I believe that White Britons, i.e., the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, they deserve a homeland just like any other ethnic group. And my belief is basically that we as a people need to turn around the demographic changes taking place, because I don’t want White Britons to become a minority.

 

And secondly, I want to ensure that Britain is run by the indigenous people for the benefit of the indigenous people. So I want us to remain a super majority in our homeland and I also want our homeland to be run for our benefit rather than for the benefit of people who are foreign or for the benefit of foreign countries.

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, I’m not going to lie. That sounds like it’s right out of the playbook of Restore Britain. Do you know Rupert Lowe?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I mean, Rupert Lowe is now talking my talking points, because I’ve been doing this since 2000. I’m now 45. I’ve been doing this for 26 years. I first got involved in this when I was at university. And it’s very interesting to see that the things that I was de-platformed from X, for the things that I’ve had my bank accounts taken away for, the reasons I’ve been banned from any form of foreign travel are essentially now the policy points of people like Rupert Lowe.

 

So the things that I face such repression for over my lifetime are now the talking points of a sitting MP. And it tells you that there is a massive vibe shift at the moment. What we’re seeing is this unprecedented political change where people are talking about things that at one point were seen as highly taboo. And it was quite a taboo thing.

 

And as I said, I have suffered sort of quite heavily because of my political beliefs. I’ve been doing this, I’ve been consistent in doing this for the past, 26 years.

 

But now these things are breaking into the mainstream. They are being spoken about in Parliament, and obviously Rupert Lowe’s now got 100,000 members who obviously agree with these talking points, which is incredible because obviously I was in the British National Party at the height it had 14 and a half thousand members. We got two MEPs elected to Brussels, but it was nowhere near on the size and scale of what Rupert Lowe’s doing. Now that doesn’t necessarily mean Rupert Lowe’s gonna win a general election, but what it does mean is that there has been a huge change in the way people think and people’s willingness to talk about race, ethnicity and demography.

 

Dean McIntosh: It’s interesting you mentioned that, actually. I had one of your compatriots or previous compatriots, Nick Griffin on a few months ago. And it gives you the vibe shift, as you mention it. I think that scored 10,000 views at my last check and I had lots of people saying:

 

“Yo, you can’t speak to Nick Griffin!”

 

I got a lot of abuse for it as well. And I thought:

 

“You know what, I’m just going to talk to the chap and get his side of things.”

 

Which is why we’re having this conversation as well. I don’t go by other people tell me, as you’ve probably seen, Mark, you’ve seen my channel. I go by going to the source, go to the horse’s mouth sort of situation.

 

So, yeah, you were part of the BNP, which is why I think you get slated as much as you do. Obviously, as we’ve just said, these conversations around race and ethnicity are now breaking through. You’ve got Rupert Lowe, not sort of spearheading that, but he’s definitely picked up the baton and is running with it. His party is doing very well. It’s interesting, really. He talks about re-migration a lot. He talks about millions must go. I know you know Steve Laws and he’s a big fan of or big, big promoter of re-migration. What’s your view of that? Do you think that we should get rid of everyone that isn’t English?

 

[05:05]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I do believe that millions should go, but I have or both myself and the people I work with have always said we would like Britain to be around 95% White British.

 

And if you stated that as a point, I think that’s something that most people who are reasonable could agree with. We’re not saying that every single person who’s got a tiny drop of foreign blood must go, but lots of them do have to go. And we have to bring about a situation where the indigenous people, these islands, are a super majority and a stable super majority.

 

So we don’t want to say 95%. Then in five years it’s 90%, then in another five years it’s 85%. We don’t want to go back down that road. So it would have to be a figure where the indigenous people were an overwhelming majority and that majority was maintained.

 

Now when we’re starting to talk about people being sort of sent home or expelled or remigrated or repatriated, as we used to call it in the BNP, you know, we’ve got to talk about this sensibly. There are 21 million people here in Britain today who are not White British, who are not indigenous or have some kind of mixed race heritage.

 

Now if we were going down the route of mass re-migration or repatriation as we used to call it, there is a sensible way of approaching this. And we’re not talking about putting 21 million people on boats in a single year and getting rid of them. There would be a system of doing this which would be sensible. It would be, it would obviously take people’s needs into account.

 

So the first people you would send back would be illegal migrants. Because really there are three types of people in this country who are not indigenous. There are people who shouldn’t be here because they’re illegal migrants.

 

So you’ve got the illegal migrants, you’ve got Visa overstayers, you’ve got people who have no legal right to be here.

 

Then you’ve got people who’ve got a legal right to be here but are not British citizens. They are people who are citizens of other countries that have gained residency here, work permits, visas. They might be studying. They’re here, but they’re not actually British citizens. Then finally you have the third group, which are people who are here and are not indigenous to these islands, and they have British citizenship.

 

Now, they’re not indigenous, but they have a passport. They have attained citizenship.

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Now, obviously, if you were to bring in, look, if somebody gave you sort of like Marvel superhero powers and you were sort of Thanos and you could just snap your fingers and these people all disappeared, that would be all well and good, but that’s not how it works in the real world. And there’s a lot of people who say, like:

 

“Oh they’ve all got to go! They’ve all got to go!”

 

But you have to put forward a policy that would actually work. And you have to realise that you couldn’t do this overnight. It couldn’t be done with the snap of your fingers. So you deal with the first group first. And the first group were illegal immigrants.

 

Now, day one, they would all have to go. You would have to start rounding them up, and you would have to start deporting them. They are here illegally. They have no right whatsoever to be here. And they have come here, and by the mechanism of coming here, they have broken our laws. And we do not want criminal migrants here. I think that’s a fair point.

 

Dean McIntosh: Are we talking about the ones coming across on the boats and things like that?

 

Mark Collett: Anybody who is here that has broken the law to be here and has broke, whether you are a visa overstayer, whether you are somebody who has entered on a small boat, whether you are somebody that has Stowed away in on a plane or in a lorry on the Channel Tunnel, makes no difference. If you are here illegally and you have broken our laws to enter this country, you go immediately! So you would deal with the first group with a stroke of a pen.

 

Now, the second group are people who are here legally but do not have right to remain because they’re not British citizens. So they do not have a passport. You would deal with them rather swiftly as well. You would wait until any work visas ran out. You would not reissue them. Any of those people who were here and were not British citizens and that were out of work claiming benefits, they would have to go. You know, why on earth we have people here in Britain who are not British citizens, but they are claiming benefits? I don’t know.

 

I mean, I don’t think you or I would be able to turn up in Japan or Nigeria or India and immediately be able to just go to some government office and start getting free money. So you would then ship them out.

 

Then you would look at people who were here through the Visa scheme or here through some temporary measure who had broken the law. Now, anybody that comes into our house and violates our laws and breaks the laws, they will be leaving.

 

And I think that’s a sensible policy as well. And over time, you would drastically reduce the number of foreign nationals living in Britain, starting aggressively with lawbreakers and people who were claiming benefits.

 

And eventually, over a period of time, people would run down their visas. Those visas wouldn’t be reissued, the foreign nationals would leave. And you would make sure there was no birthright citizenship. So even if they had children on British soil, that doesn’t give you the right to remain. And I know that America has gone down that route recently. Donald Trump has attempting to abolish birthright citizenship because people have these, what are known as anchor babies, which allow them to stay. And that would leave you with the third group.

 

So the first two groups, the illegal immigrants and those here legally who are foreign nationals, you would deal with those two groups extremely quickly, and those problems would be solved. And that would leave you with people living here who are not indigenous and who have British passports, essentially British citizens, but not natives.

 

[11:24]

 

Now, they would be dealt with in a number of ways. We could offer them reasonable grants to leave, and at the same time we could pass laws that essentially bring about something that the government keeps crowing about the government always talks about equality, doesn’t it? We always hear about the importance of equality:

 

“We’ve all got to be equal, we’ve all got to be treated equally under the law.”

 

Well, no one gives me 150 pound an hour interpreter to go to the council office. So we’ll treat everyone with a British passport equally. And if they don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to benefits. If their children don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to go into the educational system, they’re not entitled to state education. If you don’t speak English, you are not entitled to an interpreter in hospitals because all of these things are inequalities which put White Britons at a disadvantage. We pay for these things, but we don’t get these benefits. And that overnight would begin to incentivise people with British passports to take the grants to leave.

 

We would ban full face coverings in public. We would ban kosher and halal slaughter and the importation of meat that was slaughtered in a cruel manner. And overnight you would see millions choosing to go home.

 

And we would also look at people who had British citizenship but also had citizenship of other nations. So if there was a Jamaican man, let’s say, and he had both British and Jamaican citizenship and he had raped someone, he would have his British citizenship stripped. And that would be completely legal under international law, because any nation can strip a citizen of their citizenship if they have citizenship of another nation where there is a grey zone under international law. Not that I’m a big fan of international law, but this actually does abide by. It is if you strip somebody of citizenship and they don’t have citizenship of another nation. So you couldn’t strip somebody of British citizenship if they didn’t have a dual citizenship and couldn’t go anywhere else. But there are many people living in Britain who have a British passport but are dual citizens. And dual citizens that have broken the law, committed benefit fraud, have never worked, don’t speak English, they could have their citizenship stripped.

 

And over time, what you would end up with, it might take five years, it might take a decade, I don’t think it’d take much longer. But you would see a dramatic turnaround when it came to demographics. It would create a hostile environment for illegal migrants. It would more or less cut immigration to zero. And you would see a massive number of people leaving. And over five to 10 years, the demographic shifts would be drastically reversed! And you would also stop paying the people who are here and aren’t indigenous to have children.

 

I’ll give you a great example. Labour lifted the benefit, the two child benefit cap. Well, which three ethnic groups in Britain have the largest family size on average? I can tell you straight off the top of my head and list them in order.

 

Number one, Pakistanis, number two, Bangladeshis, number three, Indians. So people who come here from the Indian subcontinent have by far the highest birth rate and the largest family size. Labour are currently paying them to breed by lifting that benefit cap. By lifting that benefit cap, Labour are putting in place a form of indirect discrimination that pays certain migrant communities to have children. There would also be policy reversals like that again, that would see thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions leave simply because that policy was reversed.

 

And once you’ve done that, you would end up with a small number of people here, 5%, who were not White British. They would be fellow Europeans. There would be a limited number of people of mixed race origin who were half English and say half something else, because they can say:

 

“Well, look, I do have partial English heritage or part Scottish heritage.”

 

Whatever, but it would be a manageable number that was maintained and did not start to creep above that 5% threshold. And then it wouldn’t be discriminating against people like a man who, say, has a Polish wife or, somebody who was of mixed European origin, but their family had lived here for sort of 50, 60 years. And I think that would be fair. I think most people would accept that the idea of sending people home doesn’t have to be one of people marching down the street in uniforms, pulling people out of their houses and loading them into sort of lorries at the point of a bayonet. Sensible policy change would turn this around.

 

And if you extend that, an extension of that, is once you understand that sensible policy change could turn this around, you understand that it is policy change, bad policy, that has brought us to this point. A mixture of horrendous government policy which has created both push and pull factors, has incentivised millions of people from overseas to come to these islands because we treat them as first class citizens and we treat the indigenous people at best as Second Class and at worst a hated minority that are preyed upon by the people who arrive here!

 

[17:25]

 

Dean McIntosh: It does seem everything you’ve just said sounds like it could have come from Restore or Advance Britain. It really does. And like you say, it has crept into the discourse. Yet, what, five, ten years ago you were vilified for these views. Now you’re no longer part of BNP. I don’t think Nick Griffin’s part of it anymore. Do you know Simon Tomlin?

 

Mark Collett: You might want to cut this bit out, but Simon Tomlin, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I don’t edit anything. I do not edit anything.

 

Mark Collett: Well, Simon Tomlin’s a strange guy that has all these fanciful stories of, …

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Of what he’s done and where he’s been. He’s written all these sort of strange books. Some that claim he’s an MI5 spy, some that claims he was on the run from MI5. He has these fanciful stories that he was this big player in the British National Party. He wasn’t!

 

In fact, he’s kind of a strange guy. You can look up his criminal history. He was arrested and actually jailed for stalking and harassment of a woman who was in the wider nationalist movement. This can all be found quite easily. He’s not somebody that’s a fan of me. He’s really a Walter Mitty that makes a lot of things up.

 

Dean McIntosh: The reason I ask is obviously he’s got his own podcast. I’m not name dropping anything, but it’s The Daily Agenda, obviously, I’ve seen it. He has mentioned you. I just wanted to know your side.

 

Mark Collett: He mentions everyone. He’s one of these people who is endlessly embroiled in a series of beefs with different people. So he rages about me, he rages about Steve Laws, he rages about Tommy Robinson, he rages about Nigel Farage, he rages about Rupert Lowe, rages about Nick Griffin.

 

Now, I’m not saying all those people like one another. And some of those people don’t. You know, I like Rupert Lowe, I like Steve Laws, I don’t like Tommy Robinson. But he doesn’t like anyone.

 

And if you look into him, you’ll find out that he is a Walter Mitty that lives in sort of this little pocket universe of his own creation. He’s written a load of these really strange books. One of his books claims he has magical powers or something like that. He’s a very strange guy. All of this is on the Internet. You can Google it if you just put in sort of “Simon Tomlin, Eastwood Advertiser”, it comes up with his attempts to sort of get the Eastwood Advertiser to remove headlines about him which relate to his stalking and harassment, which he was jailed for. You know, this guy is not a nice guy. He’s not a good guy. He’s a very strange guy that makes up that he’s had this big sort of impactful career in nationalism. He hasn’t. I never met him when I was in the BNP. He never did anything of note when I was in the BNP, he might have been a member briefly, and he’s fallen out with everybody that you could imagine.

 

So, yeah, he’s not a big fan of me, but he’s not a big fan of anyone.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, that’s fair enough.

 

Now, moving on from the BNP, we talked about Re-migration Now, and Steve Laws. How well is Patriotic Alternative doing? That’s your party, isn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: It’s not a party. We are a community building organisation. We believe in three things, community, advocacy and activism.

 

Now, we attempted to be registered as a political party. The Electoral Commission blocked us numerous times for ridiculous reasons. And we eventually, when Nigel Farage came back into politics. Well, when Nigel Farage came back into politics, we were still trying to become registered as a political party and we weren’t allowed to.

 

So we had an agreement with the English Democrats. We gave them our people who wanted to stand as candidates. We gave them our activists in order to leaflet for them. And we worked with Steve Laws and the English Democrats to field a number of candidates at the general election. Almost as soon as we announced that Nigel Farage came back into politics. This was 2024 at the General election. And at that point it was over before it even started. Nigel Farage is one of those people who is a political juggernaut and his involvement in British politics carries so much weight that the previous Reform Party conference, when it was being run by Richard Tice, had around 300 people present. When Nigel Farage got back involved they were filling the Birmingham MNC, you know, one of the conference centres, the Birmingham MNC. Nigel Farage is such an influential and successful man that if you are going to take on populist Right-wing politics when he is active, you are going to be carving out a tiny, an almost, I can call it embarrassing, really, an embarrassing number of votes. You have this niche because he’s going to take everything else.

 

So at that point, we stopped applying to the Electoral Commission. We said:

 

“Let them get on with politics, let them get on with this battle for Westminster, and we will do what we do best.”

 

And what we do best is community building, advocacy and activism.

 

And what I mean by those three things is community building is we hold meetings with, we hold social events, we hold camps, fitness events, and we build an ethno-nationalist community. We carry out advocacy. Advocacy is where we fight for the rights of our people. We raise money for political prisoners, we write to the Prison Service and advocate for the rights of political prisoners. And we take up cases on behalf of people who are of our ethnic group who need our help. So we advocate for the good of our people, for the rights of our people.

 

And the final part is activism. We also go out on the streets. We’re part of the protest movement. We were recently at the large protest in Warwick and we are going to be holding another one of those protests in Nuneaton at the end of this month on the 28th of March.

 

[23:39]

 

So if you, if any of your viewers would like to attend that, we would absolutely welcome them. I am doing that in conjunction with Steve Laws. There was also the National Front there was also White Vanguard, there was also the British Democrats. Other groups who want to attend are welcome to attend as long as they stick to our code of conduct and agree to behave in a reasonable fashion. Numerous speakers spoke there, myself, Laura Towler, Hugh Anthony, Steve Laws, and we are going to build a powerful ethno-nationalist protest movement.

 

So by doing those three things, community, advocacy and activism. We are building something very different to a political party.

 

Now, that means that when Restore Britain was formed, not that it has been formally registered yet, it wasn’t something I was particularly concerned about. Now, I can imagine a lot of people running micro parties were very upset and probably very depressed at the thought of Rupert Lowe starting a political party.

 

Because if you were running a micro party, the day before Rupert Lowe started his political party, you probably thought you were going to hoover up everything to the right of Reform.

 

However, when Rupert Lowe started his party, he gobbled up everything there. And now, if you are running one of these micro political parties that’s got a hundred, 200, 250 members, you’re not going to eclipse Rupert Lowe. In fact, you’re going to be completely eclipsed by Restore.

 

So the political ground now on what you could say the populist Right, has been completely gobbled up by Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe. We, on the other hand, are going to keep doing the things we do. There is no other group in Britain that takes the approach we take. We are very open to working with other groups. The Woodlander Initiative, Remigration Now. We work with people like David Clews from Unity News Network, and we build, and are happy to build a coalition of groups that want to work together for the good of our people.

 

So we’re very open to unity. We’re not trying to carve out some little niche for themselves and get involved in these sort of bun fights that you see a lot of these micro parties involved in. And by basically being unshackled from the electoral process, it allows us to do the things that are important. And it also means that if we feel passionately about something, we can pursue that without having to say:

 

“Well, look, general public, we need you to vote for us. So we have to sell this thing that you probably won’t understand or agree with or believe in, to you.”

 

We’re not really bothered if the wider public doesn’t support some of the things we do. If the wider public doesn’t support our prisoner support program, well, so be it. We don’t have to sell it to them because we’re not going down the electoral route.

 

And a lot of these micro parties are constantly trying to sell things to the British public that they don’t understand or can’t get their head around properly. And then they get 1.2% of the vote. And it’s all been a big waste of everyone’s time and money. And we simply don’t want to go down that route.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, Fair enough.

 

So there’s a big sort of ethnic push from your side of things. I get that vibe. We’ve had a chat about it for nearly half an hour. I understand that. So what about people that aren’t ethnic nationals who say yours, Steve Law’s ideas, contribute to hostility or division of the British society at large?

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s a really, … Well, how can I say this politely? That’s a stupid point to make! And it’s a stupid point to make because the British people were not divided until mass immigration took place.

 

The greatest division between the British people when we were an island nation made up of England, Scotland and Wales was when we played rugby against each other or football against each other. You know, as a young man growing up in Britain, when England played Scotland, it was a big event. When Paul Gascoigne, you know, ran down the middle of the pitch and scored that absolute screamer of a goal. You know, the English cheered and laughed and the Scots cried. And that was the division in Britain.

 

The divisions in Britain now are much greater. And they haven’t been created by White Britons or by ethno-nationalists. They’ve been created by politicians who have brought other ethnic groups here that are so different to us. There is no hope of these people fitting in. They have created a multi-ethnic sectarian society and that has been created by design! That is not the fault of people like me who speak the truth! It is not the fault of indigenous Britons who by and large have always been against that level of mass immigration and that sort of immigration. And there are different types of immigration. But mass immigration from the developing and Third world has been something that the vast majority of White Britons have always opposed in one form or another.

 

The fault for all of this lies at the feet of the politicians who have done this without our consent, against our wishes, and have created this sort of ethnic or racial tinderbox which is now causing so many problems!

 

And when I say that, I’m not just talking about White on non-White. There are multiple different ethnic lines which create divisions. Hindus don’t like Muslims. Shiites don’t like Sunnies. There are different black gangs that murder each other on a daily basis because they come from different postcodes or have slightly different ethnicities and ethnic loyalties. We don’t want any of that here! Britain should not be a battleground for all these different ethnic groups. It should be our homeland. It is our homeland and it should be a place where we feel safe to go about our daily business and raise our children!

 

[30:00]

 

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, that’s a very interesting point because when I was born in 86, so when I was a younger chap, Whites weren’t Whites. And I say that as a broad term. You know, White, Europeans, English, whichever term you want to use, were the majority.

 

And it seems like things have got progressively worse now. People would say it’s migration. People say it’s the small boats. You could point a finger in many different ways. But what I want to get to is a different point entirely. Going back to my earlier point, doing my research on you before I reached out, obviously they call you all these names and they tied you all these different things.

 

So what’s your view on Israel? Now the reason I ask that is because they charge you with being a Nazi, obviously. See where I’m going with this conversation? But Israel, from what I can gather through my research is, and through people I’ve spoke to out there, is an ethno-religious state where everyone, I assume, everyone is Israeli, jewish. Obviously you’ve got different sects of Judaism in there, but for the most part, Israel is supposed to be like a safe zone, a safe country for jews, regardless of what type of jew you are. It seems funny how Tommy is saying that the Israelis should have a state of their own, an ethno-state, an ethno-religious state, but not the UK. And that we’re like almost like a Brazilian style melting pot. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but be honest.

 

So what’s your view on the Israel side of things? Because it seems like everyone’s okay with that, but when it’s the UK wanting an ethno-state, then it’s wrong.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, this is the greatest hypocrisy of our time. Powerful jews who live in Britain and wield vastly disproportionate power. They’re a tiny percentage of the UK population, but they wield vastly disproportionate power in terms of the number of seats in Parliament, in terms of their influence over Parliament, and the way that they distort both our domestic and foreign policy. These jews wield huge amounts of power. But not only do they wield huge amounts of power, but they do so in a way which is fundamentally not only to our detriment, but also hypocritical.

 

So people who support Israel, especially powerful jews the British Board of Deputies and the little lap dogs, like little Zionist lap dogs like Tommy Robinson, they will tell you all day and all night that Israel deserves to be an ethno-state, that Israel is a place for the jews, that the jews have a right to a homeland, that they have a right to a homeland which they can defend, where they can control their own borders, that they shouldn’t be taking refugees, that they should be able to do what they want to their neighbours. Some people that Tommy Robinson has just met, the disgusting fat blob in America called Randy. Fine. He will tell you that in fact Israel has the right to starve the Gazan children. Disgusting! But these same people will tell you that actually White Britons do not have the right to be a super majority. That we don’t have the right to our own ethno-state, that the English do not have a right to a homeland, that we should share our homeland with everyone else.

 

So the British Board of Deputies will say:

 

“Yes, Israel has a right to defend itself! The British government should defend Israel, we should send money there, we should sell them weapons, we should allow them to do what they want in defense of their ethno-state.”

 

But then when somebody says:

 

“Well look, there’s tens of thousands of illegal migrants coming into Britain every year raping White girls, attacking young men, claiming huge amounts of benefits, living in hotels, huge amounts of taxpayers money.”

 

I think it’s about £8 million a day is spent housing these people in hotels. The British Board of Deputies will turn around and say:

 

“Don’t be so racist! Refugees welcome!”

 

Why? Why is it that these people who support Israel, who support an ethno-state for jews and wield this huge amount of power, are all completely behind a place for jews, but don’t think the English have the same right? That’s a massive hypocrisy.

 

And Tommy Robinson is a scumbag! Tommy Robinson is a guy who will fly around the world campaigning for the rights of jews. But if you ask him, should the English remain a majority in England, he will reel off 101 reasons why black people should come here, Indians should come here. He was outside the Iranian embassy the other day making clips about how he would allow more Iranians to come here because they’re good people, they don’t create problems. Why? Why do we have to be the nation that opens its borders, welcomes everyone in, hands everything to them on a plate, and then watches our own people become a minority, and a hated minority at that, whilst jews get to do the very opposite? And why are the people that advocate for open borders here the same people that advocate for closed borders and an ethno-state in the Middle East? This hypocrisy needs to be called out.

 

And this is why I’m banned on X. It’s why I can’t get a bank account. It’s why I can’t travel to places like America. And it’s why Tommy is making millions of pounds a year! It’s why he travels everywhere. It’s why he’s got the freedom to do whatever he wants. It’s why he’s spending £455 on a T-shirt and £5,000 on a pair of shoes. It’s why his son is traveling around as an influencer on private jets. It’s because if you bow to these powerful jews and you advocate for Israel, you will be paid for doing. So you will be given freedom, you’ll be given the right to do as you please.

 

Whereas if you say:

 

“Hey, there’s some hypocrisy is going on here, you will lose everything like I have.”

 

[36:13]

 

Dean McIntosh: So you called out what you saw as a double standard and, …

 

Mark Collett: Massive double standard! Yeah.

 

Dean McIntosh: And they smeared you as a Nazi and you’ve been de-banked. What countries are you not allowed to go to? You said there was more than one.

 

Mark Collett: 29 European countries plus a complete ban from North America.

 

Dean McIntosh: Just for calling out, calling it how you see this!

 

Mark Collett: For speaking about two things. Speaking about demography, and who controls Britain. Those two things. I speak primarily about demography and I talk about the disproportionate power that Zionists wield in the West. Those are the two things I talk about.

 

And if you look at what’s going on in the world or what has gone on in the world over the last few years, I can tell you this unequivocally, there is no other nation on the planet who would be allowed to indiscriminately slaughter women and children in multiple different countries, kill foreign leaders, starve refugees, and attempt to drive millions of people out of their homes without international condemnation, sanctions, and even military action being taken against them. But Israel can do all of those things, and all we do is send them more money!

 

Dean McIntosh: Right, Okay, I didn’t know any of that. So that’s all a learning point.

 

Mark Collett: You must know that! I mean, look, come on, you’re an educated guy. You must know what’s been going on in Gaza. Look, I don’t want Palestinians here in Britain. I want Britain to be for us, but also I don’t want to see Palestinian children being slaughtered. I don’t want to see aid workers being strafed by Israeli jets, which has happened. You know, how many foreign nations or how many nations on the planet would get away with killing aid workers, delivering medical aid, food and water to women and children and it just be brushed under the carpet?

 

You can Google all these things. Israel is essentially a country that has subverted Western domestic and foreign policy to the point that they have the complete ability to do as they please, even to commit genocide, which the UN has determined that they have done. The UN has determined they have committed genocide in Gaza. Yet America, Britain and numerous other countries are still dancing to their tune and nothing will happen about it.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, so that all to one side. I’ll just put a pin in that for a moment. Do you think, two points to this question. Do you think that the jews should have a homeland, a jewish state of their own? And second point is a lot of people that have come out as ethno-nationalists and Catholics and Christians recently have said that they are Zionists, that they believe that Israel should have a right to exist regardless who lives there, I think it would still exist, personally, but like as it is so do you think this is people just toeing the line and Israel should be there or shouldn’t be there in its current form?

 

Mark Collett: I will say this, and I’ll start this with an interesting point. I have said today at the beginning of this, you asked me sort of about re-migration. I laid out what I believe to be a very sensible, humane and lawful way about ensuring Britain remained ethnically homogeneous and a stable ethno-state. None of that was illegal. None of that was a call for violence.

 

Yet for saying those things, you can be de-platformed. You can have Prevent at your door. You can have the police looking at your social media accounts and potentially arresting you, you can be de-banked. You can have a travel ban put upon you. Okay, for just saying what I said earlier, which I think were pretty reasonable points.

 

Now you have Israel killing children, starving refugees, assassinating foreign leaders, destabilising sovereign nations, arming terrorist groups like Al Nusra Front in Syria, which are just the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda. You know, if you believe that Al Qaeda were the ones that blew up the twin towers on 9/11, why is Israel funding them and arming them and giving them air cover? Because that’s what they’ve been doing. Now I believe that all people all over the world deserve an ethno-state, okay? They deserve their own place in the world.

 

And I’m not saying that jews do not deserve a place in the world. But what I’m saying is, why do powerful jews use their power in the West to silence people like me for saying something reasonable, like I said earlier. Yet they support a state in the Middle East which is committing genocide and war crimes.

 

Now, this is the thing, isn’t it? And what I’m putting to you today is not that jews don’t deserve a place to live. What I’m putting to you today is that jews are creating an ethno-state for themselves whilst denying that right to people of European descent. People like us the English, the Scottish, the Welsh. And isn’t it funny that every single time Israel strikes a foreign nation, Israel was heavily involved in the war in Iraq. Not on the ground, but in the preparations. And this all came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. Tony Blair said that he did meet, you know, leading Israelis who helped America and Britain not with information about important military sites in Iraq, but with making the decision to attack Iraq illegally.

 

[42:11]

 

Now, Israel has destabilised Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and now Iran. They do all this. But where does the flood of refugees and displaced people go when Israel commits these actions or prompts the West to commit those actions? They all come here! So wars for Israel in the Middle East, which help Israel grow, ensures Israel’s power and position in the region, only create floods of human traffic that come into the West. And we pay for it twice! We often pay for Israel’s military excursions. We often carry out their dirty work. And then there is always blowback. And the blowback is huge amounts of people leaving the Middle East and we face the blowback. How’s that a thing? How’s that fair? How does this keep happening?

 

Well, it keeps happening because powerful jews in Britain silence people like me who speak the truth about this. And they pay people like Tommy Robinson pay them handsomely. Tens of thousands, hundreds of thousand, millions of pounds a year. They build up their social media accounts, they fly them all over the world so that it appears that the populist Right in Britain, who should be enraged about what’s going on right now in the Middle East and should be saying:

 

“Whoa! Whoa! We need to back away from this!”

 

We shouldn’t be supporting Israel. We don’t want hundreds of thousands of Iranians coming to Europe.

 

But instead, Tommy Robinson stood outside the Iranian embassy saying:

 

“Oh, no, no, we should let them in! This is great! We’ve got to support Israel!”

 

This is all part of the Greater Israel plot or scheme or plan to create a powerful state for jews in the Middle East. But at the same time, what does it do? It reduces every other sovereign nation to either flames and destruction in the Middle East or here in the West. It reduces them to multicultural states.

 

And once we become multicultural states, once we lack in-group preference, once we are riven with division, our nations, our countries collapse. And it leaves one country in the world towering above everyone else! And that one country is Israel.

 

I don’t want to be ruled by Israel. I don’t want to be ruled by Zionists. I want England to be ruled by Englishmen for English men! And I don’t want to see Western nations belittle more than military puppets for a Zionist regime that cares nothing about White people!

 

Dean McIntosh: That almost sounds like the, what was it? The melting pot, Kalergi Plan?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s what it is.

 

Dean McIntosh: And for those that don’t know, they should go have a look at it. Something about every nation becoming a well, no ethno-states anymore, essentially, wasn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: But yeah, but there is one. That’s the point. So powerful jews in the West campaign for multiculturalism in every Western nation. They pass laws that discriminate and silence, discriminate against and silence ethno-nationalists. They support mass immigration, they support all kinds of policy Reform and social changes that reduce White birth rates. But they do the very opposite in Israel.

 

So there is only going to be one group of people in the world who have a homogeneous, powerful ethnocentric state! It’s not going to be us.

 

Dean McIntosh: So why do you think they’re pushing this?

 

Mark Collett: I think it’s pretty obvious from what I’m saying. They covet power and they want to be the, … They understand that power comes through ethnocentrism. That power comes from understanding in-group preference and understanding that if you have in-group preference and you stand together as a group when everyone else is either divided, atomized or pursuing individualism, your group will be the most powerful.

 

So let’s say you have a room full of a hundred people, 100 people. Now, if there’s a group of 20 amongst that hundred who work together and look after each other and act as a group and always have each other’s backs, no matter what, numerically they are still a minority. They only make up 20% of those in the room. But if the 80% are all bitterly divided and act only as individuals, the 20% can dominate the others. Now imagine that on a global scale, every nation is at war with itself, riven with division. Every nation is, or all White people pursue this individualism. Then ethnic groups come to Western nations and it all gets divided. They all become multi-ethnic sectarian societies where people compete for resources, they compete for money, they compete for a better slice of the pie for their particular group. So they’re all divided.

 

But in the Middle East, there is this one nation that acts for itself, that acts for the good of its people to make sure that it is the pre-eminent state in the region. They have this huge amount of power by sticking together. And we just don’t have that. And largely we don’t have that because policies that the jewish diaspora, both social and legal policies that the jewish diaspora was pushed for in the West, has left us atomized and isolated. You know, our family units have been broken down. People pursue materialism. Rather than wanting to have children. We are all looking after ourselves. We’re all looking after, you know, short term our desire for short term pleasure.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

[48:46]

 

Mark Collett: And if anyone doubts me, right, I think we’d all agree, everyone watching this is probably going to agree that the feminist agenda has been damaging to the family unit in the West.

 

The idea that women should, rather than embrace a man, they should compete with a man and attempt to do sort of male centric tasks to prove that women can do everything. And in doing that, they certainly shouldn’t marry a man or settle down or have children with a man, because that would undermine their individualism, their strength and their ability to show men that they can do it all on their own! Well, who’s pushed feminism? Just go on Wikipedia and type in list of jewish feminists. It’s pages long! Pages! Who brought about feminism? Who’s pushing pornography? Who owns OnlyFans? Look who owns it? Who owns Pornhub? It’s a rabbi! It’s a rabbi!

 

Dean McIntosh: Is it really? I didn’t know that.

 

Mark Collett: Who is pushing all of these things upon our people? Who owns the media? There are charts out there that list all the people. Who writes the books about, “White privilege”? Who are the professors in university that are teaching young White people to hate themselves and to rebel against their ancestors and despise their history?

 

Now, I’m not saying it’s all jews, and I’m not saying it’s only jews that do this. But jews are vastly over-represented in the kind of activities that I’m talking about. And are often people who play roles in these activities that could be described, they could be described as “instigators“. They are people that play central roles in getting movements started that are ultimately detrimental to our long term survival.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay. That’s a lot of food for thought, to be honest. But I just want to bring it back to the point about Western nations being divided. I’ve seen more and more of it as I’ve got older, and I’m 40 this year. And it was never this bad.

 

I mean, yeah, you’d have like the occasional, we all knew some twat who was a bit of a racist or someone who’d make a gay, … There was always someone who had a gay joke or whatever. And I remember, I think we peaked in the 90s where nobody gave a fuck!:

 

“Okay, you’re gay. Oh, I don’t agree. You don’t agree. Whatever. People don’t agree. But okay, that’s your business. Oh, you watch porn, that’s your business. Oh, you’re black, you’re Muslim, it’s your business!”

 

All of a sudden. I’ve seen over the past, call it 15 years, there’s this massive sort of merge of everything being a problem now. Where do you think that has come from?

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s come fundamentally from hate crime laws. It’s come from a huge shift to essentially cencored speech. I mean, what’s wrong with making jokes about gay people? What’s wrong with making jokes about anyone? Because you sure as hell can make jokes about White people! You can make jokes about straight White people, White families, you can make jokes about Christians, so why can’t you make jokes about Muslims? If you make jokes about straight people, why not about gay people? If you can make jokes about White people, why not about black people?

 

The fact is, the policing of our speech has been something that has accelerated drastically, both in terms of legislation through the government and in terms of the way the media have weaponised the idea that if you say something that’s unpopular, you should be hounded, you should be banned off social media, you should lose your job, and you should face social repercussions which are so strong that it leaves people sat in their houses feeling as if they can’t speak their mind and bottling everything up.

 

Now, look if you happen to be gay, which I don’t think you are, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I’m married! [chuckling] To a woman. To a woman!

 

Mark Collett: But if you’re gay and you want to do that in your bedroom, it’s up to you. Right? But why do we have to have grown men walking down the street in bondage gear, performing sex acts on each other on a Saturday in broad daylight in the middle of August, in front of families going out shopping. Why has it gone?

 

Dean McIntosh: Actually, it was the podcaster, Andrew Gold. I met him last year at the Battle of Ideas in London. He actually said, I’m sure it was him. He was at a Pride march, just good to see what it’s like. And he saw two men doing that in the middle of the day.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, but why do we have to see that? What you see, this is an interesting thing, isn’t it? Why has it become normalised? Why have the people in power made it normal for two gay men to perform sex acts on each other in broad daylight at a festival and then termed it “Pride”?

 

Well, again, it’s an attack on the family unit, it’s an attack on decency, it’s an attack on morality, and it’s attack on children.

 

And ultimately, that last point is more prescient than ever, because you can see what they’re doing to our children. It’s constant sexualisation, abuse, trying to get children to accept things which are absolutely sick and twisted!

 

And a lot of this then is all wrapped up in careful marketing. The word “pride, rainbows, love is love”. Well, is any of this good for us? Does any of this make life better for regular folk? Is any of this actually helping? Because they would talk about safeguarding, don’t they, safeguarding children, whilst a Drag Queen is reading to them. And the Drag Queen’s associated with another Drag Queen who’s committed sex offences against children and then goes on to die after having sex with a dog! You know, those are the sort of people that these people say, “love is love”, want your children to be exposed to. And women take this, because one of the core British values, we’re told, is “tolerance”. Well, I say that tolerance is not a virtue, it’s a sickness! It’s a sickness that has been pushed upon us. And many Western people now are afflicted with that sickness.

 

And we need to purge that sickness, and we need to be less tolerant. Because, remember, tolerance isn’t a good thing. You tolerate something that you don’t fundamentally like. You take a walk to the shops and you tolerate the stone in your shoe because you’re thinking:

 

“Well, it’s going to be a short journey and it’s raining, so I don’t really want to stop and take my shoe off and get the stone out.”

 

[55:28]

 

But the stone’s hurting your foot. You tolerate things that you don’t like or that harm you, and you tolerate them to your detriment until you can tolerate them no further.

 

Why is it a virtue to tolerate things that harm you and your family? It’s a virtue because the people in power have twisted everything and turned it against us. Even our core values that now apparently underpin our society are actually evils that do anything but underpin our society.

 

They destroy traditional British society! They destroy any last ethnocentric pockets around the country in order to leave White Britons as isolated, atomized individuals who are then prey to ethnocentric groups brought here from overseas who are handed everything on a plate and often learn to hate us when they arrive here. Because as soon as they get off the boat the first thing they’re probably given is a nice hotel room and some money. But if they start doing some watching of the television or some reading of the books, they’ll soon learn about how the White man is evil, how British people oppressed everyone, how we’re basically demons in human skin that have this great privilege and have been keeping them down for not just decades, but for centuries, maybe even millennia! What is this? Well, it’s a system of not just replacing us, but it’s a system of turning us into a hated minority who are preyed upon by those brought here to replace us.

 

Dean McIntosh: And that’s a very sort of deep point as well. I know we’re sort of getting pressed for time. We’ve got about 15 minutes left. I know you, …

 

Mark Collett: Look, this is why people like Andrew Gold won’t debate me. There’s people like Andrew Gold and Liam Tufts and Tommy Robinson, fundamentally cowardly people. They would never debate somebody like me because I can actually answer what they are saying. I can actually put these points over in a relatively articulate and engaging way. And it’s why I’m so heavily banned. I’m not banned because I’m making ridiculous points. If I was making ridiculous points and I was some kind of racist caricature, I would be on X and I’d be boosted to the moon, because then everyone would laugh at me and say:

 

“Look, this guy is ethno-nationalism. That’s why we don’t want to be ethno-nationalists!”

 

So they get rid of people like me, and then you have people on X who do things in such a clownish way. They’re getting millions of views, but they look like complete idiots and they embarrass our cause. They’ll turn up and do street stalls with two or three people dressed in what looks like a Hitler cosplay outfit. They’re allowed on X and they will get millions of views for doing that because people are laughing at them.

 

No one’s gonna let me go on X and get millions of views because what I’m saying is relatable. And when people do upload clips of me on X, like Jake Shields recently did, they go viral, you know, hundreds, thousands or millions of people see them and go:

 

“Why isn’t this guy on X? I agree with everything he said. How is it I’ve not heard of him?”

 

You’ve not heard of me because I’m basically the most banned man in Europe because what I say makes sense! And anyone that fact checks it the points I’ve made about IDF planes killing civilians and killing aid workers, they’ll find out it’s all true! And then they’ll be like:

 

“Well, why didn’t I know about this?”

 

Well they didn’t know about it because there is an aggressive agenda in place to keep the truth from you.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

So what does the future look like? If we could fix things, what would the future look like if, say, I’m a Harry Potter wizard and you’re Prime Minister tomorrow, Mark, what are you going to do to fix the country?

 

Mark Collett: Well, like I said the first thing you do is you’d stop immigration. You would then start a system of repatriation or re-migration. As I said, and I laid it out earlier, you would put in place lessons in schools which taught White Britons to be proud of the great things that their ancestors did. Why is it wrong to have national pride? Why is it right to teach White kids that their ancestors were evil slave owners, when in fact Britain was the one country that on a global level opposed slavery and essentially brought it to an end? So if slavery is the big evil, why aren’t our kids taught, well, you’re actually the descendants of people who ended slavery! That’s what the British Empire did!

 

Dean McIntosh: It did. Yeah, yeah.

 

[59:55]

 

Mark Collett: Instead we’re told:

 

“Oh, your ancestors were White. White people own slaves! You know, self flagellate a little more, White man, hate yourself a little more!”

 

These are simple policies that could turn things around. Repeal the ridiculous hate crime laws, tear down the facial recognition systems, put an end to digital ID, enshrine things like jury trials, have free speech for everyone in Britain, build an ethno-state, a high trust, high IQ, ethno-state for indigenous Britons, where our children are safe to play in the street, where men and women feel safe to voice their opinion when something’s going wrong. Build a country where you have a representative democracy that really represents the people!

 

Why is it a taboo to point out that democracy, which is another one of these apparent “British values”, doesn’t work? How many people are there in Parliament that actually represent our views? 2, 3 out of 650 seats? We just want a better world, and we don’t just want it for White Britons. If you said to me:

 

“Mark, what about other people?”

 

Well, yeah, I want the same for the Japanese. I want the same for the Indians. Let India be an ethno-state! Let Afghanistan be ruled by the Afghans! I was against the war in Afghanistan. If Afghans want to live under the rule of the Taliban, as long as they don’t threaten their neighbours or us, let them. If the Japanese want to live proud, ethnocentric Japanese men and women that honour their ancestors, just let them. Let everyone control their own destiny, live within their own areas. We can trade. We can visit each other. There’s no reason why we can’t have the Olympic Games or the World Cup. We can even learn from each other, if we wish to.

 

But the fact is, good fences make good neighbours! Every group of people, every ethnic group, has their place in the world. But why should it be on the same street here in England? It shouldn’t! You know, Japanese people in Japan, Nigerians in Nigeria. Why should they all be on the same street in England competing against each other for a slice of the pie?

 

Dean McIntosh: Mark, that’s a brilliant, brilliant end to this episode. Thank you ever so much for your time today.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! If people want to hear more from me, check me out on Rumble, check me out on Telegram, check me out on Gab. I mean, all those good places. I produce regular content like this.

 

And if you do give me a sub, I will be very grateful. Thank you so much!

 

Dean McIntosh: I’ll put all the links down below in the description.

 

 

[1:02:09]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/22/2026 = 484)

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Brilliant guest.
In group preference is completely normal around the World. Mankind is tribal. White people are finding this out the hard way.
123

@DMLaments
5 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Can’t argue with a word he’s said. All very reasonable.
88

@Keribou109
2 weeks ago
Thank you for having Mark on
69

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you for watching
11

Hide replies

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Britain, England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland.
63

@HopyHop1
10 days ago
Ireland has the same problem.
5

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
I think Britain is England, Scotland and Wales while the United Kingdom includes Northern Island,
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
most of our ancestors were HUMBLE POOR FARMERS. NOT rich slave owners!
48

@Lakers-u2v
2 weeks ago
Exactly! I hate when you have people like ian wright constantly go on about whote this and white that. It’s our country!! Dont tell else what we have been. Get out of you dont like us.
9

Hide replies

@Benjamin-j5t5u
2 weeks ago (edited)
Mark is a true Patriot who loves his country and it’s people. What is wrong with that. Restore Britain
82

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Maximum of 38 months to next election yet Rupert hasn’t even registered his party.
I can’t decide whether Lowe has been tricked by the establishment to dilute Reform’s vote, or if he just hates Farage so damn much he’s willing to risk another eight years of left wing destruction.
2

@evolassunglasses4673
7 days ago
​ @Veyron1967 Reform have on solutions. Its better we start building something new NOW
2

@manchesterlass600
3 days ago
@Veyron1967 untrue – the application is in and just waiting for approval by The Electoral Commission

Hide replies

@JacksonFairweather
2 weeks ago
Good to see Mark Collett back on Youtube. He has been banned by every platform possible, and deserves to be heard.
68

Hide replies

@PatriotViolet
2 weeks ago
Wow your guest has put into words my every thought
51

@LegendofLovecraft-b7r
6 days ago
Hail Collet!
7

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Mark Collet has ball of fucking steel and deserves ALLL of the respect and ALLLL of the love. We as british people have the duty to protect this man
6

@ayupmeduck5708
5 days ago
Fluent use of the English language is a must, no exceptions.
6

@kevinsavage808
2 weeks ago
Best interview from Mark for a long time. Allowed to speak and answer good questions put to him. Good Interviewer….
48

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly
14

@paulsmith8858
12 days ago (edited)
No, he didn’t challenge him on anything!!!

@kevinsavage808
12 days ago
​@paulsmith8858he didn’t need to, all true, you can’t argue with the truth
9

Hide replies

@Gudha_Ismintis
2 weeks ago
the ‘Frankfurt School’ has a lot to answer for
65

@Wjfiswjei183
2 weeks ago
Oy vey!
26

@nationalist9904
2 weeks ago
Very true, Professor Kevin MacDonald goes over Frankfurt school and others in Culture of Critique. Essential reading to understand how we’ve been subverted
12

Hide replies

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
He’s always on point and a very compelling speaker. It’s plain to see why they make life so hard for him.
72

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
He said AIDS was a kind disease because it targeted gay men and drug users.
3

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Kind AND based then?
13

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
You don’t have to agree with homosexuality, but being that cruel and callous is terrible optics. Most normal people in the developed world are repelled by cruelty.

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Get over yourself, Princess. There are bigger problems afoot.
7

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
@Costa_del_Artlepool I forgot we only have the capacity to deal with one problem at a time.
Room temperature IQ.
1

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 The big problem tends to throw your lot off roofs.
5

@EnglishFemale
13 days ago
​@johnlondon5516 be careful you don’t snap your string of pearls
3

Hide replies

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
Great guest. Mark is the real deal as far as I’m concerned. I hardly ever find anything I can disagree with him on.
37

@Occident.
2 weeks ago (edited)
He’s consistent. I shared a stage with him in Darlington back in 2002. He was a young dude, but delivered a great speech. His position has not shifted. He has stuck to his views. Good on him.
19

Hide replies

@tonyaughney8945
12 days ago
Great interview. Mark is a top man.
9

@ScepticalWoman
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is the acceptable face of the views
expressed here. This gentleman was ahead of his time. That time has now come.
17

@shanetomlinson4604
5 days ago
Powell wasn’t listened to, Griffin wasn’t listened to, Lowe is our last chance
2

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
Mark hit the nail on the head though and pointed out that anyone ‘on the right’ espousing Zionist views
, is usually a snake in the grass. I’ve yet to see what Lowe is all about when it comes to Israel.
1

Hide replies

@ThisIsJamesL
2 weeks ago
Proud to have Mark as my friend
13

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
When you know you know.
33

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
I know.
6

Hide replies

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
Great to see Mark getting his say ,talks total sense
10

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
Top man is Mark!
40

@shaunhalliwell7544
2 weeks ago
Been consistent in his views.
7

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
@shaunhalliwell7544 Been consistent in his grifting too. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

Hide replies

@geraldfisher5683
2 weeks ago
Very good interview. Mark talks a lot of sense. We urgently need a policy of Remigration. It is the only way to get our country back.
15

@carpetsonline3718
2 weeks ago
” is this good for Jews” as they break out in a cold sweat….
17

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
First time Mark has been interviewed by Orson Welles.
29

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Compliment of the day! Makes a change not being called Temu Carl Benjamin
16

@arslongavitabrevis5136
5 hours ago
@DMLaments face-green-smilingface-green-smilingface-green-smiling

Hide replies

@WolvesRugeley
5 days ago
Very interesting interview
3

@fishtherapy100
13 days ago
THIS IS COMMON SENSE. COMMON SENSE HAS BEEN CRIMINALISED. THIS WAS A BOG STANDARD VIEW IN THE 1970’S. I HAVE NOT CHANGED MY STANCE AT ALL.
6

@AJC298
2 weeks ago
Really good interview that. I have a lot of time for Mark and have read his book.
19

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you
5

Hide replies

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
They want to bring back Babylon and rule over it
5

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Dude was born when I graduated highschool. I’ve watched all of this happen since the 80s. Every year it’s worse and worse
5

@BritishNaturalist-vb8hj
9 days ago
Mark makes a lot of sense & only describes the way this Country was during my childhood growing up in the fifties & the sixties.Our leaders have completely betrayed us.
4

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Great Video Paul with the truth.
17

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Everything the BNP predicted, particularly Jonathan Bowden is coming true.
They had a much better understanding of the long-term trajectory of Liberal Capitalism / The Global American Empire/ Z0G than the centre Right.
64

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Met that great man twice in the N/E. Blucher Village in 2006, and Jarrow in 2008. Brillient Orator Smashing fellow.
13

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
​@Occident.A brilliant orator.
1

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
In politics timing is everything.
8

Hide replies

@Dim3nsion_78
2 weeks ago
Labour have repeatedly stated it has been left with a £22bn blackhole in its finances. Yet continues to spend billions on hotels and welfare for migrants. The government could easily cut its expenditure and reduce the debt – but it hasnt. This isnt incompetence, they want the migrants here.
23

Hide replies

@ColtPython22
12 days ago
It’s refreshing to see an interviewer who lets their guest speak without interrupting.
7

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Thank you kindly
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
Schools LIE . Schools LIE to children. Schools NO LONGER teach the Truth and Facts.
31

@PaulD330
2 weeks ago
He’s just a nationalist, eth nat is a made up term.
44

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
To be a Nationalist, was to be an Ethno Nationalist. It literally went without saying. However since the controlled opposition Tommy Robinson and others appeared, with their brand if multi-racial (fake) Nationalism, the term “Civic” was coined to describe that movement. Hence we have the two. “Ethno” and “Civic”. Only the former is real Nationalism. The latter is a half measure, a cowardly cop out doomed to failure.
18

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
It’s been coined due to the likes of Tommy or Farage civ nat aka fake nationalists so it helps to distinguish who’s on the side of the indigenous white population that being ethno nationalists
4

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
​ @PpHT9217
Dud you see Robinson and his “Not White” quote. I find that very troubling. And Spanish resident, Paul Thorpe, is exactly the same. All calling for Unity on their terms. Suspicious agenda.
4

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @mesolithicman164 you only need to follow the money who his handlers are ,Steven is a puppet for Jewish Israel interests, he does not care one bit about the indigenous white populations in Europe becoming a minority
4

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
Since Blair’s time, we’ve been sold the idea that to be British is to hold a passport and sign up (officially, at least) to ‘liberal’ values, not ethnicity. That’s why we need to disringuish between ‘Ethno’ and ‘Civic’ Nationalism. I say this as a man with a Chinese wife, and two mixed race sons. She is a British citizen, and a good one, but she wouldn’t dream of claiming to ethnically English or British.
2

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
No. 2 things.
1

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Tolerance is Not an English or Christian value! There is no such thing as British values, that term was coined by Tony Blair!
15

@RosemarieMaders
6 days ago
This person speaks the absolute truth
2

@Ann-u5k5n
10 days ago
The English Constitution is the solution for us all
3

@SerenaJB3
2 weeks ago
Mark is a great person and a true patriot.
20

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
And a grifter. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

@PpHT9217
11 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 he takes those super chats to live , like to see how you get on being completely de banked
3

Hide replies

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
We’d prefer not to be rubbed out thank you very much
26

@filled_soda
8 days ago
This comment section fills me with hope.
3

@EnglishFemale
2 weeks ago
If they silence you it’s because you speak truth .
6

@lowbrow
2 weeks ago
Agree with every single word
45

@Stanley_1215
7 days ago
And thats why they’ve silenced him and won’t debate him. He eloquently speaks researchable facts!
I’m ashamed of not caring about politics until the referendum. I’m ashamed i fell for tommy 10 sheckles. I’m ashamed i fell for the smear campains against this man.
I’m glad I have the humility to admit it.
A lot of gen Xers like myself were too busy living hedonistic lifestyles to see beyond the bottom of a bear glass.
Thanks for having the courage that other podcastsers lack. I love anyone who can laugh at themselves Orson Wells I saw your reply
Subbed
6

@DMLaments
7 days ago
Welcome to Laments
1

Hide replies

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
This sounds like what Rupert Lowe has planned.
Restore Britain
33

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
Yes but this is proper..
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
And he’s not far right. He’s just right.
29

1 reply

@julianmorris9951
12 days ago
Hypothetically, if you’re a black man in the absolute middle of nowhere on your last legs and suddenly see three groups of say 50 men, one group is white the other Pakistani and the third group is black, who do you walk towards?????, you would 100% walk towards your own ethnicity and there’s nothing wrong with that
8

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Look at what their talmude says and kaballah
6

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Fucking incredible to see Mark Collet! Love Mark! Saw the interview with russel brand from 2002 and was woken the fuck up!
3

@andreroswell1561
2 weeks ago
Great interview.
14

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you, much appreciated
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
there are also those with citizenship that came here illegally and are now legal; these must go as well
22

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
If you were born in the 70’s you would have a very different opinion as you would have seen a total collapse of English society!!!
13

@ShamanKyrick
12 days ago
I was born in ’90 and can say the exact same
2

Hide replies

@ClintBeastBud
12 days ago
The guy speaks complete sense and truth fair play to him.
4

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Just found your channel, it poped up in my feed.
The youtube algorithms are working well atm, finding lots of decent channels talking sense.
Great interview
17

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly, more interviews due to be released
7

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
​ @DMLaments I have notifications set for your channel so look forward to more discussions.
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
​ @djsioux2265 thank you. There’s a lot more coming, various topics and people
2

Hide replies

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago
The natives can’t afford having large families also no housing to even think about having large families,somehow our replacements seem to have no problem in the UK doing those things with extra help from governments past and present.
18

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
All part of the deliberate replacement policy. One bunch behind it.
11

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@Occident.We node
1

Hide replies

@filled_soda
8 days ago (edited)
I literally just finished Dutton’s review of Naziboy. This popped up afterwards.
Mark’s a legend.
3

@jagi1484
13 days ago
I don’t understand the world has gone mad. All this is two men having a sensible conversation.
3

@BasedSaxon
12 days ago
Always liked Mark
9

@nadimovitch9237
5 days ago
Let’s see if Rupert kisses the wall.
2

@WingBroJoseph
2 weeks ago
EthNats for the win!
29

@myt110
2 weeks ago
Aim high, vote Lowe
7

@NotOnMyWatch-i8n
13 days ago
Does this mean I can’t move to Florida and get given a free house and some cash? Damn! I was relying on that.
6

@johngammon963
2 weeks ago
This is true
14

@waxingmiracle
2 weeks ago
Good chat and discussion thanks.
7

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Paul, we live and learn, we hope.
6

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
That’s the problem. Everyone has turned a blind eye
2

@endrominastercermilenio642
2 weeks ago (edited)
We are a huge problem in our democracy when people like the guest today, Mark Collet, are cancelled.
I can’t argue against anything that he said. And I am an immigrant that he would like to repatriate!
9

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
He was cancelled a while ago, as well as debanked and is barred from majority of Europe
1

Hide replies

@lisalisalake
2 weeks ago
don’t ignore the absolutely connected and dangerous biblical/religious aspect to all of this…the imposition of noahide law in every nation… jewish sharia if you will…
10

@gabemore1766
7 days ago
It’s a genocide
6

@stuka80
2 weeks ago
man i remember mark colet from years ago. dude disappeared for yearse. im happy to see him again.
4

@stephenparker5241
2 weeks ago
Nationalist are ethnats, but they try to portray them as white supremacists which as far as I can see this isn’t the case
8

@smithjones9130
13 days ago (edited)
It must be frustrating for Mark. 20 plus years he’s been banging this drum & now the overton window has shifted far enough to make his talking points mostly acceptable, he can’t because he’s banned from everywhere.
7

@kirstypalmer33
12 days ago
MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO ME
2

@sparticale1954
5 days ago
36%, 25%, 16%. Better to be an Ethno-Natinolist than the victim of Ethno-Genocide.
1

@cimmerian_savage9736
5 days ago
If caring about the survival of your own race is tribalism, then tribalism is simply the natural, default behavior of any organism that exists in populations rather than as isolated atoms.
A Nation body of people having a common descent, history, culture, or language but without a separate or politically independent territory.
2

@bigjawontour9679
2 weeks ago
Mark came out of the English working class and knows his stuff. One of the only men in the UK who has ALWAYS stuck to his principles.
11

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
Money doesn’t buy you class

@Heimbach1966
13 days ago
He’s not working class. That’s why he’s never had any real traction
PA is just middle class people.
1

@bigjawontour9679
8 days ago
​ @Heimbach1966 after a quick search on wikipedia, I stand corrected. From a middle class town and privately educated. PA do know what is going on rather than being paid up zio shills imo.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@Heimbach1966 Who cares what class he is – Tommy Robinson claims he is “working class,” yet is stinking rich by most standards, shrills for Israel and grifts money of his gullible supporters.
6

Hide replies

@robhunt-watts8908
5 days ago
I liked & subscribed because I too am an English ethnonationalist.
1

@robertlestylo6085
2 weeks ago
Excellent interview. My contribution: the Paradox of Tolerance (Karl Popper – Austrian philosoper). To those unfamiliar: Look it up.
5

@teaattiffanys
2 days ago
Absolutely and we have to be proud of who we are . And thats not another state of Islam we will be another Iran unless we vote Restore Britain. No other party will put the indigenous first
2

@Martine-c3t
2 weeks ago (edited)
So me being a kind English white lady gets called more names as an adult then I did as a child but maybe that’s because as a child everyone looked like me I always wondered why god put us in our own countries?? Could it be because we don’t really get on with each other or does saying that make me a racist?new subscriber
28

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Spot on I hear you as a boomer, we didnt have these issues back in the days!
9

Hide replies

@wobwub8188
12 days ago
Take the first two minutes, how do you disagree or argue with that?! I can’t.
4

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
As Mark says – it is PATriotic Alternative. PATriotic (British English) – PATEriotic (American English). When did so many of us come to speak American and why? (Fine, of course, for the Americans.)
2

@CaroleHoward-g6p
13 days ago
Thanks for the video very informative
5

@Pumpemup
2 weeks ago
I agree with everything this man said
15

@TheArtofTheBrave
2 weeks ago
Mark talks a lot of sense, especially his closing remarks. the stumbling block is that certain people would find it impossible to parasitize the populations of western ethno-states, and they will, and do do all they can to prevent that……..
6

@eyemallears2647
13 days ago
This is crazy. How am I struggling to find fault in any of his points???
7

@piercerockwell2588
12 days ago
Why are you trying to go against an Englishman that wants England to be White? What’s wrong with you
3

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Because it’s impossible to find fault with the truth.
2

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
There are no faults!!! Hes spot on with all of it bravo
1

Hide replies

@venx4733
2 days ago
Simon Tomlin is not a Walter Mitty , he is the real deal ….he’s always been a Nationalist….
1

@winstonsmithstaxi
2 weeks ago (edited)
I used to disagree with PA on repatriation and ethic identity stopping non Brits from standing for public office. I have now changed my mind. I will add that while we should try to make change politically, we need to be realistic and accept that a conflict is inevitable
26

@ryan-audax
13 days ago
You think a civil conflict in the UK is inevitable?

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Took your time getting there
Followed you for years buddy, hope the family are well.

Hide replies

@stephenwellstriggers
2 days ago
Mark is a legend
1

@YJB8CCFC
6 days ago
All the hatred and divide is being caused by Western Governments and the Jewish state of Israel. The Jews and the west want total control of the Middle East for its oil rich reserves. It’s causing upheaval to the people there, causing waves of migration to the west. That’s the big issue. If we(The west) and Israel didn’t interfere in Middle East politics, they’d all still be there. And this has been going on since WW2
3

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Yep everything and all our countries have been bought and paid for by them.
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Britsh society. Wtf is that. Currently its based on invasion. Who would want to uphold that.
7

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
The thing that really gets my goat is the lack of any Christian traditions in schools. Lack of respect for Christians in schools. My son being told to hide his cross ,whilst a dominant religion is rammed down their throats constantly,even colouring in geometric patterns handed out to the children are labelled islamic patterns?!?!? well,to me they looked like stained glass window,Church patterns!
21

@johnfused8281
13 days ago
We aren’t a Christian country. We are a pagan country. What does christianity have to do with Britain?
5

@auntsally5683
9 days ago
@johnfused8281 a lot if you look into it, crusades, the national flag, christian names, the law………it is fused with pagan traditions as well.
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
makes sense to be an ethnonat
3

@keithswood6205
12 days ago
Good interview and not one unreasonable point. The host was good and I recommend he follows up on the points Mark made about some of the key actors behind every single subversive movement of the last century. Its worldview shaping stuff.
4

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Its on my “to do” list
Thank you kindly for watching

Hide replies

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
I absolutely agree with everything that dear English gentleman Mark Collett has said in this stream, thank you @DMLaments for interviewing him. I am highly educated and have done mass research and know what Mark is saying is true. God bless you and every native British.
28

Hide replies

@DaveRhine-h4g
2 weeks ago
Wow! At about 37:31 the host declares that he doesn’t know about Israel getting away with the genocide of Gaza in sight of the whole world. At this point in time how could you not be aware of that?
10

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Genocide in Gaza??!!

@DMLaments
13 days ago
I dont follow Israeli news
3

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
@DMLaments Its world news my guy, it’s all interconnected. The way of Palestine will be the way of the world.

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Surely he’s just a “Nationalist”?
This term “Ethno” is pure gaslighting and deflection!
16

@danielarcher1459
2 weeks ago
Mark is brilliant, thank you.
4

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money. Brilliant at grifting.

@danielarcher1459
13 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 I have been invited to those events too and before you make the payment it states very clearly ‘All sales are final and non-refundable’. Perhaps if you spent as much time advocating for our people as Mark does and less time gossiping you would command more respect, but you come across as petty and deconstructive to the cause.
2

Hide replies

@arslongavitabrevis5136
6 hours ago (edited)
Excellent interview. Mark Collett is a true patriot. He put up with a lot of abuse and harassment, like Laura Towler and Sam Meliá, but carried on fighting. I wish him and PA all the best. Simon Tomlin is a despicable creature who has been abusing and slandering Mark, Laura Towler and many other honourable nationalists. According to him, he is the ONLY decent, true nationalist. He is either a psychopath or a troll working for the government.

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago (edited)
Why would any country feed the ones who attack them,Egypt, Jordan also shared a border with Palestine,but they also closed their borders to Palestine.arabs are not native to those parts either.
7

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
I love this guy!!! This is what Jesus was preaching. Jesus Christ is King and I can’t wait till He is ruling the entire earth again. Come soon Lord
6

@psychodrilla
23 hours ago
Ruperts plan will never happen – the half past twos have bought and paid for all this. Ask Barbara Lerner Spectre!
1

@trance.vault.official
5 days ago
Simon tomlin is a true nationalist look him up
2

@paulmorrisrotga77
11 days ago
Great video, subscribed and here is a comment.
3

@DMLaments
11 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@Alma-q6m
13 days ago
It is immigration policies. It is immigration policies. Restrict and limit the state. Embrace the free market system. The ingenuity of the Brits is amazing. Get back to the community. Civil disobedience, where you refuse to pay taxes that are working against you.
1

@TheGreatWhiteLight
2 weeks ago
So the right has been completely gobbled up by Tories
6

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago (edited)
That was the Tory job, keep the Right out of power. So no room for people like Enoch. Now Farage is tge last attempt to corale the RW vote, but he’s failing. Reform is dropping like a stone.
And Restore is on the way up.
So it needs to keep fools like Ben Habib and Robinson out of the party.
12

Hide replies

@Rusty-Hinge
13 days ago
Came for the Collett interview, left because of the advert volume.
2

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If not for Isreal, the world’s opinion of Hitler and co would be very different.
There are many reports of people welcoming the Germans into their countries. The victors of war write the history books.
22

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Sometimes it takes 100 years to really appreciate the work of a Painter.
11

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago

@Occident.And sometimes it takes no time at all

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago
How did that work out for them?

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
​ @Freyjawitch well how’s it working out for us ?
6

Hide replies

@domestinger8805
2 weeks ago
nationalist = ethnonationalist
you have fallen for the language trick
16

6 replies

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Brilliant guest – I agree with everything Mark says. However I have to say that I find it a very strange interview style from the host – he asks a question for a second time – eg “what would you do on you do on your first day as PM” when Mark has already answered that at length.
2

@DS-it9ef
2 days ago
If we ban halal they will start stealing and slaughtering our farmers cattle and continue to kill our wildlife
2

@DMLaments
1 day ago
So you’d let it continue?
1

@DS-it9ef
10 hours ago
​ @DMLaments no, we need to be more serious with our tactics. They only respect strength. They think politeness and kindness is a weakness. That’s why they have been taking advantage of us for decades

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Power
2

@JaneBarlow-z7y
2 weeks ago
Im not being snotty, but instead of guests why dont you Brits submit FOIA requests to all the city/ town councils in England, Wales, Scotland? Put the heat on them. Make them produce their records, finances, expenditures. And then do this for agencies, govt offices, etc. Talking does nothing. We do this here in America. Its YOUR country and money.
11

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
Depends on what you request as to whether or not you’ll recieve the information. If you request information that is ‘sensitive’ they just send you a message saying ‘not in the public interest’ and that’s the end of it, we’re being blocked at every turn.
10

@NoNeed2No
2 weeks ago
Lewis Brackpool has been really good on this, he’s a citizen journalist who makes frequent FOIA requests.
6

Hide replies

@raymondwoods2304
12 days ago
Restore will not harm Reform as Reform is merging with the Uniparty (so leaving the Right/Centre for Restore). Reform is harming Reform because Reform is engineered to fail.

@INCOMING-UK
1 day ago (edited)
Israeli’s are leaving the promised land by boat, they are heading for European countries to claim asylum.
How many are Farage, lowe, Robinson and the flag shaggers willing to take into their homes. Are you going to give them mobile phones, cars and cash ?
Will Rupert and Nigel welcome their votes ?

@Michealst1
1 day ago (edited)
All seems simply basic stuff……Vote Restore….VVOVV Mark has it all vvorked out sounds real good to me.

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
Has Labour government England London tighten up asylum seekers yes it old Thatcher conservative governments immigration policy Thomas it Home office they forced into by England. .
1

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
It’s kaballah
2

@dandoc5160
2 weeks ago
every 5 minutes there’s an advert ffs
9

Hide replies

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
Brilliant great interview Mark speaks so much sense..If most the normies could watch this especially the Israel bit it would change so many minds…No wonder the Jews hate him
Great interviewer too letting him speak, asking great awkward questions no one else seems to ask..Great stuff….
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Thank you kindly
More to come..

Hide replies

@paulreader7353
9 days ago
You missed a group there
1

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
You going to hustings Glasgow Anniesland yes April 14 6.30 to 8 o’clock . Brilliant content. Edinburgh parliament yes 34 politicians lose their seats jobs. Reform uk party that gained politically. Third place in Scotland politically.

@parade1996
6 days ago
Mark collett the state asset.
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Evidence?

Hide replies

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If I click the subscribe button it will unsubscribe me!
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thats odd

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments He’s saying he’s already a subscriber. Please turn your brain on.
3

Hide replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin doesn’t hate everyone he likes Dean Neil, the traditionalbricklayer. Mark also has a dislike for nick Griffin. Not taking sides, I like both of them.
4

@dd7521
13 days ago
He seems to hate most though.
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Tomlin only likes Dean Neil – so that’s just ONE person – everyone else he hates – Laws, Collett , Lowe etc etc. He has even started having a go at young Charlie Downes and Connor Tomlinson who is not even a spokesman for Restore. When I first came across Tomlin on YT he seemed good but his constant punching right is getting so obsessive and repetitive that I can no longer watch him. Tomlin clearly imagines that he should be the great leader of the right – maybe the fact that he can’t get on with anyone would have something to do with it! Mark by contrast has forged alliances with a number of people on the Right and he is not the only one to be critical of Griffin’s leadership style so he is not alone in that.
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 He offers a paid subscription to “remigration action” which entails people handing out leaflets on remigration…truly a mastermind of politics. Let’s not forget his little plot to takeover the BNP by flooding it with members which went NOWHERE, and was doomed to fail.
2

Show more replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
11 days ago
​@MayeDaye01to be fair Connor went to israel, I wonder if he kissed the wall? Lowe has also said in a x post a year or so ago that we must defend israel. Im wary of a lot of these people.
2

@Purp00000
12 days ago (edited)
I went off him a while back and I was there since probably his first video, every accusation he dishes out is more like an admission…not to mention his fake “hunted by the police stories” which just exist to make him sound more edgy and interesting. Not to mention his “I have secret information that will come out soon” regarding Nick Tenconi which was just a free to view searchlight article on Nick’s sex life…Genuine, pure, grade A bullshitter. Oh yeah, I still have a screenshot of a comment he deleted where someone criticised his merch for being made in the third world.
1

Hide replies

@gman0068
13 days ago
57:57 who was that

@John-d5y2d
6 days ago
99.9%

@parjau4554
6 days ago
Re: “Jews” wanting all the immigration. Admittedly, this is sort of true but the reality is these are just left wing, mostly atheist, liberals who happen to be born Jewish. Actual Jews do NOT want that!! For a very good reason.
The most important thing for real Jews is Israel. And right now, Israel generally has the support of powerful, armed Western Nations. But mass immigration to the West is mostly coming from Muslim countries which means that the demographics are changing such that in a few years, there will be many Muslims in society and in power. And this huge number of Muslims will influence these Western countries to do what? TO TURN AGAINST ISRAEL. And without Western support, Israel will be bombed out of existence! So, No. Real Jews do NOT want mass immigration!
And BTW, Israel is not a Jewish ethno-state in the way you said. It is 20% Muslim. And these Arab Muslims are full Israeli Citizens.

@puddlestoo1
14 hours ago
I don’t get it. Why would Israel not want any western nation to be an ethno state? With many slowly becoming Islamic states where does that benefit Israel? I would say it does the opposite as their enemy (Islam) would now have acquired nuclear weapons! Makes no sense.

@jamestower4473
2 weeks ago
The opposite is happening
1

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Which part?
2

Hide replies

@tancreddehauteville764
13 days ago
The only issue I have with Rupert Lowe is that he gives the impression of being a gin soaked golf club Tory. He needs a decent, ordinary guy, with a good brain, from a lower middle class or upper working class background to work alongside him and push some of the economic policies to the left, in order to attract white working class voters, especially women. We cannot win without women’ support.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
millions of working class people voted for boris johnson over the socialist “down to earth” corbyn
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Working class people don’t care about what class you are if they like your policies – they all flocked to Farage back in the day didn’t they! By all accounts Downes and Pitt are more economically to the left than Lowe as a lot of zoomers are anyway so that solves that one.
1

@DebbiejBurgess
12 days ago
Lowe is a fraud

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Yeah I don’t wanna spend the afternoon with him but I want him to restore Britain. Your point is insinuating people aren’t intelligent enough to vote for the policies he’s offering.

Hide replies

@matthewbazeley2984
4 days ago (edited)
Britain had no division before mass immigration?? Don’t make laugh. The class system is incredibly prejudiced and it’s the elite that gave us mass immigration.
1

@Natalya.57.Volkova
2 days ago
And that is how you dilute relevant discussions allowing enemies to change the subject and win, congratulations
1

@matthewbazeley2984
2 days ago
And that is how you throw toys out of the pram. Maybe take a nap?
If facts and accuracy allow your enemies to win then you are not on the side of truth

Hide replies

@DuruttiVisca
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is a Zionist so not a nationalist
4

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
I haven’t heard him say that but I did ask him if there was any Zionist financial backing of restore and got no answer
4

@Lothnar5070
6 days ago
Making up crap without evidence is weak. Maybe you can also accuse Santa claus with the same bullshit?
1

Hide replies

@ianoliver3779
10 hours ago
too many adverts on this channel.

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
What about an english man with an asian wife?

@Robin-Chats
2 weeks ago
RUPERT LOWES Restore Britain will make it easier for foreign spouses to come here.. it’s a policy he’s talked about.
7

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @Robin-Chats Is it?

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@DJAA21M it’s always about me me it’s , our island and our Eth are being at risk of gn cdcd and you say what about my Asian wiffe
6

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB Yea you got a problem with that, I have a right to know?

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB I agree with Mark Collett and Rupert Lowe, I am against globalism, I am a nationalist in that I think all nations should be sovereign and embrace their culture, I wouldn’t go to my wife’s country expecting them to adapt to me or expect their way of life declining and their race being replaced, my wife doesn’t expect that here, she was happy to see the union jacks and george crosses being put up everywhere but you have to understand my family is my priority so I need to know about that before I support something, otherwise that would be irresponsible of me wouldn’t it, you clearly don’t give a sh!t about the many people in my situation so get off your high horse
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
I think what Tracy means is there are no organized grape gangs from the Philippines or Thailand or Japan operating in the UK, but there is obviously a problem with organized grape g@ngs operating all around the UK from other Asian “communities” that are so protected by the state we cannot even mention the ethnicity of said groups but here is a clue it starts with Pak and ends with stani
1

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z I agree with that but I want to know is my family safe in Mark Collett’s or Rupert Lowe’s vision of Britain?
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
That’s what divorce courts are for
13

@francesaquatech3696
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z
5

Hide replies

@Purp00000
12 days ago
All you need to know about Collet is that he recommended Mein Kampf as a must book to read in an interview.
2

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
My struggle in German. Your point is?
6

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 I don’t really care if you think you have any relation to Germany, I don’t have a particular point here to make..I simply wish to inform people.

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​@Purp00000
Your totally irrelevant in my world also.
5

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 The contents of Mein Kampf and the context of why Collet reccomended it is also irrelevant it seems.

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
​@Purp00000 Seems like you got ratiod on a centrist channel.. The people are starting to break their shakles.

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
Would you have an opinion on The Communist Manifesto? Genuinely curious
3

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​ @DMLaments
Why should I?

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Lion-Roar1it shows the mindset of a Marxist

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments The Communists are wrong because historical materialism outside of a few select and specific class analysis situations is utterly stupid and inapplicable. It assumes that if you restructure economic relations, human nature will obediently follow. I can’t really give you a whole analysis but that in particular stuck with me. Should you read it? Maybe, I read it to better understand Marxism which I am opposed to.
1

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
​@Purp00000I’ve read both books, just for the record.
I understand Hitlers book getting the flack it does but I dont think it should be banned, or not talked about etc
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments Me too I agree, books should not be banned. But it’s not like he recommended this book for the purpose of historical insight. He does it because he is a Neo-Nazi – and make of that what you will. I just wish he would stop the deception and just say what he is. That type of thing makes me dislike someone. Dishonesty in politics is never good.

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Purp00000when was politics last honest?
3

Hide replies

@Row1and
9 days ago
mark the mi5 agent
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
Evidence?
1

Hide replies

@MagicEZvil
2 weeks ago
He has not called out Nigel Farage for the Grifter he is. Not to be trusted. HIs words do not match the reality of the Reform Policy – ‘Say what is popular to get into power’.
2

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Somehow, I dont think Mark is part of Reform UK..
4

Hide replies

@anniestephenson6296
9 days ago
Oh , please return the wealth that’s been stolen for the last 400yrs .

@VincentComet-l8e
2 weeks ago
Surely, rather than aiming at non-British people, shouldn’t the criteria be whether they have skills we need, will work productively, and also have a Western mindset and want to integrate into our way of life?
1

@dd7521
13 days ago
5% would cover that.
5

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
The bottom line is we need to be at least 95% in order to maintain ourselves as a majority. The emphasis will be on training our own. If we do need some foreigners with very high skills in the interim then they will be included in the 5%. The “integration” fairy tale clearly hasn’t worked and people need to be weaned off that story.
5

@VincentComet-l8e
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Yes, I certainly agree that we have to do whatever is needed, in order to maintain ourselves as the clear majority demographic…

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
What about teaching the needed skills within our education system by making said system work in our favour rather than political indoctrination tripe? Then in a fairly short time the skills needed would be more home grown. Is that not reasonable?
1

@VincentComet-l8e
2 days ago
@julieobrien8252
Of course, home grown talent is far preferable.
But our ‘education’ system is far from perfect and/or functional.
And firmly captured by the Left.

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
​ @VincentComet-l8e let’s hope the education system is reclaimed to fulfill its proper purpose for the long term prosperity of England.

Hide replies

@g.a.m.b.i
7 days ago
Marks not english, the plum
is Italian buahahahaha
1

@JohnCollins1981
2 weeks ago
Maybe there is a compromise on this?

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
There is no middle ground,we either get the demographic replacement to stop or we die out that’s your choice
4

Hide replies

@Mazen7600
12 days ago
Mark, you have all my respect and admiration!! You always say the things that I think about
1

@jackdoe4632
2 weeks ago (edited)
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago (edited)
Tomlin is always reciting fairy stories about everyone – so I wouldn’t believe what he says.
As for the donation you mentioned – the events do not have entrance fees – so if someone donates to help set up and organise the event and then doesn’t attend it is not like they bought a ticket – ie the money has been donated for and spent setting up the event so why should it be refunded? Tommy Robinson for example asks for donations to help with setting up his rallies – I doubt if anyone would get the donation back if they asked as the donation is to help with setting it up not attending.
2

@jackdoe4632
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 Except that at the time it was not conducted in this manner.

@MayeDaye01
11 days ago
@jackdoe4632 You are being very vague -there are really only two types of events in politics – as I said marches and rallies which don’t have entrance fees or tickets anyway so as I said if people donate to help with setting it up they can’t expect to get a refund just because they don’t attend and if it was actually something in the style of a party conference then tickets like that are never refundable – if you can’t attend a Tory conference or Reform conference or whatever you would not be refunded.

@jackdoe4632
11 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Mark Collet is on record as saying his is an entirely different genre of politics to mainstream parties.
However, according to what you are saying, there is common ground between him and them when it comes to money eh?
Take note I use the word money and not “donations” because there is a wide gulf, fixed, between the two.
He has cheated far too many fellow nationalists. Far too many times he has treated them with contempt where money is concerned as well as backstabbing one who passed away but he’s not alone in that.
At least now, it’s out in the open. Exactly where he doesn’t want it to be.

Hide replies

@franitfcful
2 days ago (edited)
There’s also Palestinians living in Israel approx 2.1 million research it ! As for knocking Tommy Robinson when you can muster 2 million people behind you then come back to us …when you spend most of your life including solitary confinement in prison for speaking up then best you stop the hate towards him .I hope this man can walk down the street safely without fear of being killed like Tommy faces every day of his life

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Was with this guy until he said Israel was an ethno-state – it has two million Arab Palestinians living and working there. Or that it never gets sanctioned – it is the most sanctioned nation on the face of the earth – mostly by the 56 Muslim countries in the UN known as the OIC.
Advice: Israel has nothing to do with our governments policies. Once you invoke Israel or joos more moderate Brits will tune out.
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
So people will tune out because they hear someones ideas they disagree with and or dislike?
3

@Veyron1967
8 days ago
@DMLaments it’s not hard mate, he’s advocating for a more indigenous England, so why bring Israel into it at all? He is diluting the message and giving the ‘refugees welcome’ brigade an opportunity to attack something irrelevant to the argument.
Mass immigration in the UK is the problem, not Israel. People can see what is happening to our high streets so keep the message simple.
3

Hide replies

@DMFS7
12 days ago
Agree with most of what Mark says but he talks absolute bollocks about Tommy Robinson being paid millions of pounds by Israel! Too bad he wasn’t asked for evidence of that claim just to see the arm waving (he doesn’t have any).
Also, he is being very disingenuous when he whinges about being cancelled and debanked without mentioning the “Young, Nazi, and Proud”.documentary in which he “starred”: it is the main reason that he is considered by many to be beyond the pale. It’s a shame because it was decades ago and we all change a lot in 20 years, but there it is and let’s not pretend it isn’t still tainting him.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
he’s a loud mouthed fool

Hide replies

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
2 weeks ago
I wish Mark would just go away. He stinks so bad. I agree with most of what he says but he is repellent to most human beings. Please don’t support Restore because you will put people off voting for them. This is our last chance man. Please stop talking.
2

@dd7521
13 days ago
Why does he ”stink so bad” especially when you say you agree with most he said?
3

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@dd7521 I’ve been watching Mark since he was leader of the young BNP and he has been caught several times genuinely supporting an Austrian painter. People are desperately trying to paint Restore with the same brush and we don’t need to give them any ammo. If we want to get any real power we need to get the support of the general public and the truth is that Mark is to toxic for most people. He needs to step aside. If we don’t get this right this time we are finished. I want my country back and I don’t want someone like Mark messing it up.
3

@dd7521
13 days ago
​ @blueberrycheesecakesupremo fair enough, thanks for your reply.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@blueberrycheesecakesupremo He is only “toxic” because the liberal media want to continue the narrative – haven’t you learned that by now? You say you agree with most of what he says but then talk about the “general public” as though you are not part of the general public yourself! The “general public” are waking up and going further to the patriotic right
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 The liberal media did not force Collet to send death threats to Nick Griffin…

@JohnnyRollocks-v1z
13 days ago
We tried all that with the BNP I personally joined in 1989 been there and done it all still do a few protest now problem with the British people they still listen to scumbag politicians lying main stream media just look at fake farage and his circus
2

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@JohnnyRollocks-v1z Yeah I know, Farage is a joke
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
Hes an absalute bell end

@alpine7891
12 days ago
Well you’d better get used to it lad cos the people are finally waking up.
7

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 are you insecure?

@alpine7891
12 days ago
​ @jamesquinn9971 I can’t wait! Honestly, it’s gonna happen, we are going to win and get our country back! Woooohooo
2

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 youl just be forgoten like nich griffen was

Hide replies

@JohnWayne-d6y
13 days ago
The problem in the USA is birth right anchor babies… once they have that birth certificate they are legally American Citizens regardless of where or who they are… what a mess the Democrats have made
2

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
Elon, are you listening?
7

@IrishScouse10
6 days ago
good man Mark great interview
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Why’s the doom goblin saying it can’t be done, he’s sold his soul.
5

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
To the juice
2

Hide replies

@SEKreiver
3 days ago
Collett has been fighting the good fight. Great guest!
1

@MrPopeye007
8 days ago
Mark the brave
1

@Pacex76
2 weeks ago
If i said what i think should be done id be arrested
2

@ArthurShilling-f8c
10 hours ago
Nothing about this should even be considered as unreasonable. In fact, this MUST happen and sooner rather than later. If not, the consequences will be dire.

@VikingSimonStabilis
1 day ago
Ethnonationalist, what does that mean?

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
What about the illegals that arrived and where given leave to remain by the home office.
2

@BasilGanglia-b7g
13 days ago
I thought he was a young Ronnie Browne from The Corries. LOL!
2

@DMLaments
13 days ago
Kenny Rogers
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
I’m angloist
3

@niallmurray8654
13 days ago
Well I’m Irish descent born and bred in England and Angloist too
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
To judge other people on the colour of their skin is pathetic
1

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
No one is doing that character and culture. Skin colour doesn’t come into it.
3

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 to judge people because they have a different back ground is pathetic

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
Britain has always had different peoples coming and going the last 2000 yrs has seen all kinds of people , read some history books pal

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
@jamesquinn9971 but to judge people that inflict harm on others is valid. So your argument is pointless. Your saying we should accept harm and abuse just because if we don’t it’s prejudice. You need your head checked. Do by your standards if it’s someone’s culture to rape children that can’t be judged? If someone’s character is evil that can’t be judged? Insanity!
3

@Multiverse82
8 days ago
@jamesquinn9971 I’m not your pal by any means
2

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 are you insecure?

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
Did your mummy not love you argh poor boy

Hide replies

@damthebloodandlandthirsty
8 days ago
small minded little englander – is he unaware of the brits that emigrated to ‘the new world’ – simply recall anyone with british heritage back = instant 99.9% majority

@WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe
2 weeks ago
Mark Collette is rumoured to be a honeytrap operator to get real NationaIists Iocked up . .
I am of the uItra far right spectrum so to speak.. but I would not trust Mark at all, because he isn’t careful enough.
Please beware of this feIIa because many people say he is dangerous !
4

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
There are many of us that actually know Mark, and those rumours are designed to stop anyone listening to him!
12

@apollo53122
2 weeks ago
What people need to be mindful of are people like this who go around spreading malicious rumours about others.
4

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
Simon Tomlin
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@tyronekelly-e6z aka Walter Mitty!
1

@aconcernedcitizen6056
2 weeks ago
Why are you listening to rumors Mr “ultra far right”
Have you met Mark?
Have you ever even attempted to join a real world movement?
15

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Who says that he is dangerous?
Who says he is a “honeytrap”?
Im genuinely curious, I haven’t read that anywhere
11

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments Simon Tomlin. Never shuts up about him.
7

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
How is he getting people locked up? He doesn’t advocate for those things that Simon has led you to believe.
6

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@alpine7891 Tomlin has said, many many times, that people close to Collett keep getting sent down. Sadly, that is true. There’s Sam Melia, the Longshanks fella and another close friend of Mark’s whose name escapes me at the minute. Now I’d argue that these people have done what they did independent of Mark and made their own choices, but it’s still true that people close to Mark have been sent to prison while him and Nick Griffin both got off and still find themselves free of police intervention. I think that’s because Mark doesn’t break the law.
5

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey I mean, Tommy Robinson has been sent down so should we now believe he is to be trusted and telling the truth
It’s more likely Mark has been careful, but who knows in actual fact. But he seems to be doing a great job in waking people up to real Nationalism. He doesn’t slander people and certainly doesn’t punch right and I’ve never heard him advocate or simp towards NS
And he also tells people to avoid NA.
6

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Yeah it was a very long time ago mate.. He was young and immature and admits he’s embarrassed by it. We really should get past that, we’ve all made mistakes. But he’s doing more to waking people up to real Nationalism.. Now if only he still had his YouTube channel with 100k followers…Oh yeah Simons still got his YT and x accounts hasn’t he.. How strange, makes you wonder
2

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Exactly mate

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey they were locked up prior to being involved with Patriotic Alternative, need to get your facts right
3

@ThomasSukhoi
2 weeks ago
Everyone is a fed.
Don’t trust anyone.
It’s hopeless.
1

Hide replies

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and good evening and welcome to tonight’s stream. We are live on Odysee. We are live on Rumble. We are live on DLive and we’re live on Entropy. So you can find me in all of those good places. And if one of those places decides it no longer wants to work for whatever reason, you can hop on over to another. Plenty of options there.

 

So please do spread that as well. Please share the stream tonight, share the links and let people know that this is happening, because this is a very important stream, and I think this is something that people will get a lot out of so do me a favour and share it in places I can’t share it. Unfortunately, I’m not on X, so I can’t share it there. I’m not on Facebook, so I can’t share it there. And I’m not on other mainstream social networks. I’ve shared it where I can. But if you can boost it and share it, I will be very grateful.

 

Now also, if you would like to help me, if you would like to donate to the stream, if you would like to make a financial contribution, you absolutely can do! And I are very grateful to anyone who does that you can make contributions through Entropy, which is linked in all of the live chats, or you can make contributions directly through Rumble. And when I’m not online, so if you’re watching this on replay, you can also donate through Entropy at any time or subscribe at any time through Rumble. A subscription cost just $5 a month. It’s a recurring payment. It’s a very small amount of money, but it makes a great difference to me.

 

And as I’ve said before, if enough people took out subscriptions, I would be absolutely over the moon, because that would really help me out. It’s a small amount to everyone who does it, but to me it makes a great big difference when it all adds up.

 

So you can donate to me now during the stream, and if you do donate to me during the stream and if you attach a message to it, I will absolutely ensure that I answer that message at the end. Because I will do a Q and A, or a Q and A at the end, I’m not just going to do my presentation and leave this. I am going to answer your questions, if you send those questions in. And you can send the questions via Entropy or via Rumble. And I’ll be monitoring the chats through the stream to collect all of them.

 

You can also donate via crypto-currency, all the crypto links in the description below. And finally, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Very easy. You can write to me there. Get in touch with me if you wish to.

 

Now, before we go any further, I’m going to say something that I say every time I do one of these big, more contentious presentations, and that is, can you please listen to it all?

 

Now, I always say this because there are people that dip in and dip out, and unfortunately they’ll hear something that they don’t like or that they find objectionable. But maybe I’m saying that, making an argument and I’m playing devil’s advocate, maybe they take something out of context and they get annoyed and then they send me an angry email or write a comment saying:

 

“Why did you say this?”

 

Please listen to it all. This is going to be a long stream because I’ve got a lot to say, but I think what I’ve got to say will be very helpful to a lot of people. So please do listen to it all.

 

Now the reason it’s going to be helpful and the reason you should listen to me on this is because I’ve been around for a long time. I’ve been around in this movement for 26 years, and I have been actively involved in what was Britain’s most successful ethno-nationalist political party to date, which was the British National Party at its height. And I was involved in local elections and national elections. I was involved in frontline activity and back room activity. I was the leader of the Young BNP, I was the head of publicity, and I stood for election numerous times and did proper campaigns, knocking on doors, speaking to people. I have proper experience of all of this. And I know where things can go wrong and I also know how to make things go right. So I am somebody you should listen to.

 

But also there’s another reason you should listen to me. When I first got involved in the BNP, it was around the year 2000, and back then there was a wealth of older nationalists involved in the BNP that had been involved in the 1970s.

 

So if you were sort of in your 30s in the 1970s, you’d have been in your 60s in the 2000s. If you’d have been in your 20s, in the 70s, you’d have been younger. Some people got involved at the end of the 70s, 78, 79, and these were men still in their prime and they imparted a wealth of information to people like myself, people who are active, people who would listen, people who were dedicated to the party. So I not only viewed things firsthand in the BNP at its height, and I was there for a decade, but I also have a wealth of information about where things went wrong in the 80s, in the 70s, about the factionalism, about the electoral failures, about the splits. And this is very important information. And if it’s kind of lost to time, we lose something that we should all learn from.

 

[05:31]

 

So that’s another important reason to listen to me. Not just because of the knowledge I have, but because of the knowledge that’s been handed down to me.

 

Now, I want to say this as well before we go forward. I’m not going to trash Lupert, … Rupert! Well, that’s a good start. [chuckling] I’m not going to trash Rupert Lowe tonight. There are some people out there who are ethno-nationalists and they are going out for him, and there are people who are civic nationalists going out for him.

 

And I think not all of this, but some of the people who are trashing him, trashing his team, attacking his party, trying to rubbish him, are doing this out of a degree of envy and bitterness!

 

Now, there’s a lot of bitter people in nationalism. There’s a lot of people in nationalism who have what I call “Main Character Syndrome”, where if they’re not the leader, if they’re not the last guest speaker upon stage, if they’re not the centre of attention, they have to cause endless drama, endless splits, start their own party, and then rather be in a room of 10, 12 people as the boss, than they would be in an auditorium with tens of thousands as just a local organiser, or a valued activist. And I sometimes wonder, you know, where these people would have been pre-Second World War, when Mosley was holding his giant indoor speeches, and he still has the record for the largest indoor political rally in British history.

 

And I wonder where these people would be then. You know, there’d be the people saying:

 

“Don’t back Mosley, back me!”

 

They’d be in a corner of a pub somewhere, corner of a smoky pub in the East End, talking to 10 people as Mosley was filling a stadium. And this sort of Main Character Syndrome, this bitterness, this envy, has caused a lot of people over the years to attack those who are more successful, who are better speakers, who are more able to lead. Not because they think that the person who is better qualified, you know, is actually a bad person, but because they’re jealous! Because they’re desperate to be that person and have what that person has. And that’s not just confined to nationalism, that’d be confined to lots of political spheres or found in lots of political spheres. And I’m sure there are, I will mention, some Civnats who are also attacking Rupert Lowe now out of what I believe is jealousy.

 

But I’m not going to be trashing him. So anyone who came here tonight to hear me read out all of his old tweets or talk about his time as chairman of Southampton Football Club or anything like that. That’s not what it’s going to be. This isn’t going to be a character assassination.

 

So, sadly, if you’ve come here for the character assassination, sorry, you’re gonna be disappointed. This is going to be a serious presentation that’s going to last maybe an hour and a half, maybe two hours, because there’s a lot to say. And just to reiterate, we’re going to start now. We’re going to start. But just to reiterate, listen to it all. Don’t listen to part of it, listen to it all.

 

And we’re breaking it down into three parts. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

 

And if you noticed, I use my graphic design skills to actually sort of recreate the fonts using used on the Good, the Bad and the Ugly DVD box set. When I made the graphic, which I was quite happy with, actually, I was quite happy with that graphic. Give myself a little pat on the back there for using my design skills. Hopefully you all noticed that, and if you didn’t, I pointed it out because I wanted you to notice it.

 

Anyway, we’re going to start with the Good. And the Good starts really well! Now, I like Rupert Lowe and I’ve done several streams where I’ve talked about him.

 

Now, if you watch the first stream I did about Rupert Lowe, which was Farage versus Lowe, I pointed out a few things that I was concerned about with Rupert Lowe, a few things that I was a little bit worried about, and I was a little bit critical and said:

 

“Can we trust this man?”

 

Now, I didn’t do that to trash him. I did that because I didn’t know enough about him. And when I hear that a man has come into our movement and he’s got this history of finance and banking and City of London, I’m going to be suspicious. And he’d also in the past done a few tweets supporting Israel. So I put all this together and said:

 

“Look, I can’t jump on this right away with enthusiasm.”

 

But here, several months down the line, my opinion of Rupert has improved dramatically. And I would actually say he is a great man! He seems like a great man anyway. And he’s saying all the right things. And to have a man like Rupert Lowe, who obviously appeals to a lot of people, speaks very well, he dresses properly, he looks the part, he carries himself like a leader, like a man you could imagine being Prime Minister. Having a man like that in Parliament talking, our talking points, should not be underestimated!

 

We have never, ever in the history, or post-war history of this country, had a man like Rupert Lowe in Parliament. Rupert Lowe is the first of openly ethno-nationalist MP we have had! And I am thankful for that! And I’m thankful that he speaks well. I’m thankful that he hasn’t got these skeletons in his closet, that he hasn’t got some criminal past, that he isn’t someone who was tied up in really shady shenanigans as some MPs were or are. He seems like the kind of guy that people could genuinely follow.

 

[11:42]

 

And also there is an air of authenticity about Rupert. And I’ll tell you why. Some people will doubt him, but I think he’s been on a political journey. And the reason I feel that way is if you look at him and you look at the things he’s been saying over the past few months and years, the time he spent in politics. And he isn’t a politician, that’s important. This isn’t a guy who spent his life in politics and has finally got here. This is a man who stepped up at a time in his life when he felt what most people would have felt, that he should have been winding down. The guy’s a multi-millionaire. He could have turned around and said:

 

“Look, I don’t need this. I’ve got enough money to ensure that myself, my children and my grandchildren will be looked after.”

 

He didn’t have to get involved in the fight, but he did! And he got involved in the fight and he started off in a place where, look, many people who are here today watching this stream will have started off. He started off as a bit of a Civnat. He started off as a guy who said:

 

“Look, we need to stop immigration, we do need to deport people who shouldn’t be here, the illegals, etc. But you know, lots of people come here and they can fit in, they can assimilate. And really the problem is that if people aren’t going to assimilate if they’re not going to be like us, they shouldn’t be here. And anyone can fundamentally be British, but you have to buy into who we are and respect us and speak English!”

 

He started off there. And that should be familiar to a lot of people, because a lot of us, not me! [chuckling] Look at the old documentaries, not me! But a lot of people started off there and then came to ethno-nationalism. They went on a journey. I know real people. I know some of our Regional Organisers. I know some of our guys who are our best activists who started off in the EDL [English Defence League], who started off with sort of slightly colour-blind civic nationalism, and they ended up like:

 

“We are being replaced!”

 

And some of these people are our best people. This is a familiar, real journey that gives him authenticity. This isn’t a guy who turned up yesterday and was like:

 

“Hello, fellow ethno-nationalists!”

 

Nor is it a guy who had some bizarre road to Damascus conversion from the Labour Party or the Tories. This is a guy who went on a very familiar, very authentic journey! One that I’m sure many people who are ethno-nationalists today would understand. And I know people, good friends of mine who have been in parties before, like For Britain. I know good people who have been in the EDL. I know good people who have been in parties like UKIP [UK Independence Party], who eventually woke up to ethno-nationalism and came to us. And it seems Rupert has done that. And you can actually track the tweets, you can track the change in his opinion. And I think that is really good!

 

And I think that makes him, as I said earlier, authentic. I think that makes more people believe him. I think that makes more people understand his message and say:

 

“Yes, Rupert, I started off where you started off. I started off at UKIP. I started off as a Right-wing Tory. I started off thinking this could all work if we all just learnt to live together. But now I understand we’re the indigenous people and we are being replaced.”

 

I think that’s going to make people love him even more. People like myself. I’m not saying this to just trash myself on stream or anything, but people like myself are a lot less approachable than Rupert Lowe. That’s not because I’m a bad person or I do anything particularly wrong, but I didn’t really go on that journey. I’ve been sort of sat here talking about demographics since I was 20.

 

But Rupert has gone on this journey that most people will understand. And going on this journey, speaking out, talking about indigenous Britons, talking about the fact that having a British passport doesn’t make you British. He has revitalised this movement. He has breathed new life into the ethno-nationalist movement, which was fragmented, it was fractious! It was a mixture of, if you like, sort of warlords running their own little war bands. And he’s united people behind him. And I think he’s given people hope, genuine hope! I think a lot of people were saying to themselves:

 

“Where do we go from here? Is there any realistic way of gaining power? I don’t want to join a micro party. I don’t want to be in a group that’s small and maligned, where they’re wearing face masks. Where do I go? Who do I support?”

 

You know, people have stood on an ethno-nationalist ticket, are getting 1% of the vote. Then all of a sudden, Rupert Lowe comes out. He says what he’s saying. He says it with authenticity, he says it with this sort of real purpose, and people believe! He’s breathed life into the movement, he’s revitalised it, he’s giving people hope! And it’s no surprise that 70,000 people have already signed up in a week. 70,000 people already! He had 50,000 in the first, 24 hours, another 10,000 in the next 24 hours, and over the next few days he’s had another 10,000!

 

So obviously the growth will slow off, but what a pop to get things started. 70,000 plus members!

 

[17:55]

 

And I’m going to put this into context for you, because I’ve been around the block. The BNP at its height, 14 and a half thousand members. The National Front at its height, 16 and a half thousand members. Even if you put the BNP at its height and the National Front at its height, and you plop them all together, Rupert Lowe’s members after just a week are more than double the BNP and the NF put together at their heights!

 

Now, that puts things into perspective. Never before has a man been able to make an ethno-nationalist message so mainstream! And that’s something we should applaud. That’s not something we should knock. We shouldn’t be saying:

 

“Oh, how can I pick holes in this?”

 

We should be saying, somebody in the chat saying, it’s 80,000. Everyone in the chat:

 

“It’s 80,000. Mark, it’s 80,000!”

 

Well, even better. Even better, it’s 80,000 now.

 

That eclipses the National Front and the BNP put together to an even greater degree. And that’s something we should all be happy about. You know, to say that ethno-nationalism could be more popular today than it’s ever been! Why would we be complaining? Why would we be tearing this man down? Why would we be attacking this man? For the first time in post-war history, we have this powerful ethno-nationalist party which is effectively much bigger by a huge magnitude than the National Front and the BNP put together at their heights. Brilliant! That’s a good thing!

 

And I’m going to say this is a genuine ethno-nationalist party. I’ve said this earlier, but his first tweet, the Restore Party’s first tweet was:

 

“Having a British passport doesn’t make you British!”

 

And what he’s saying here is there is something more to being British than a little booklet, a piece of paper, a rubber stamp on a form. Being British is tied to blood, to ethnicity, to your lineage! It’s tied to thousands of years of history on this soil! That is ethno-nationalism!

 

And I’m disregarding his old tweets and I’m telling you why. Because he’s been on this journey. I’m going to assess him fairly and honestly. He has come out and essentially said he’s an ethno-nationalist. And his first tweet confirmed that. It went against everything that this new “British value system” stands for. It flew in the face of Starmer, who said:

 

“He’s going to go to war with people who say things like that!”

 

He’s effectively gone to war with Starmer. We should judge him on what he does going forward, not his old tweets.

 

Let’s accept he’s been on a journey, he’s come to our position, he’s batting for us, he’s saying what needs to be said. And he is not just pulling that Overton Window by a few millimeters. He is booting that Overton Window as far to the Right as he can! And if anyone jumps up and says:

 

“Well, Mark, what about those tweets? You keep disregarding them!”

 

Well, recently he was asked if he would ban halal slaughter. He said:

 

“Yes.”

 

And people said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

And he said:

 

“Kosher!”

 

And every tweet he has sent, since then, he has said:

 

“We will ban halal and kosher slaughter.”

 

Now, I can tell you this, no Civnat party has ever said that. I remember For Britain and Marie Waters, remember them? Anne Marie Waters would go out campaigning about halal:

 

“Cruel halal slaughter!”

 

But she would never mention “kosher”. When people brought it up and said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

Her answer was always:

 

“Oh, well, this is a much smaller issue. You have to deal with the bigger issue first. The Muslim slaughterhouses are less clean, less sanitary. It’s not just about the slaughter method, it’s about this, it’s about that!”

 

She would do anything to say that she wasn’t going to ban kosher. Rupert Lowe:

 

“No, we’re banning kosher. It’s gone!”

 

Now this is something that jews would regard as “anti-semitic”. Jews would hate this! And no Civnat, Farage, Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, none of them would ever say this! So we have got to give him the benefit of the doubt. And following this, we’ve had his great policy paper.

 

Now, unusually, really scathing of policy papers and it’s usually because they’re written by people who don’t matter.

 

You know, if you’re somebody who’s got 10 followers and you sat in your bedroom and you write a 200 page document about what you’re going to do when you get to power, you come across like a bunch of kids sat in your dad’s garden shed planning on how you’re going to build the moon base, when you get to the moon. You’re not getting there. Not being funny, you’re not getting there! You’re kids! You’re planning on building a rocket and you’re planning it all out and you’re talking about how the moon base is going to operate. It’s never going to happen when you’ve got 10 people and that’s it.

 

There’s no point writing a 200 page piece of policy. You write those kind of in-depth policy papers when you are knocking on the door of power, when you’re in Parliament. They have weight then!

 

[23:50]

 

And this is what I’ve always said, if you go back over all of my old streams, I have been consistent on this navel gazing desire to write:

 

“The best hundred page policy document on immigration, or the Green Agenda?”

 

Waste of everyone’s time. Absolute waste of everyone’s time! Unless you’re an MP and you have some clout. And this policy paper published by Rupert Lowe. Fantastic! Fantastic! One of the best I’ve ever read. You know, you got to give this man a pat on the back.

 

And look, I’m going to be really honest now. This where we are today with Rupert Lowe. 80,000 members, a genuine ethno-nationalist party with an MP at the helm is where we should be. This is where the BNP should have been today. The BNP should be where Restore is today. And if the BNP had had a credible leader, if it had been run correctly, maybe we could have been. But we weren’t. It went down in 2010, it was dead in 2014! It couldn’t really be resurrected then. That was when it was knocked down so heavily in 2010, it never really got up.

 

But the last life left the BNP in 2014, when the last seat was lost in European Parliament, in one of the most humiliating ways imaginable. This is where we could have been, it’s where we should have been, and it’s where we would have been if we’d have done things right.!

 

And looking at this, to me, in some ways it feels like we’ve kind of got this second chance. It feels like many of us felt that the last real chance was in the 2000s with the BNP. And here we are in 2026 and it’s almost like we’ve been granted this second chance, this second chance of a proper ethno-nationalist party. And for that I am thankful.

 

And this is the thing. Rupert has a real credible chance of getting people elected. Let’s not ignore that! He has a real chance of getting people elected. This is not a micro party. This is not a party that has double or triple digit membership numbers. This is a genuine political party.!

 

And this takes me on to another one of the good points of all this. And this is a bit of a patented Mark Collett, “I told you so”. But Rupert Lowe has proved me right over the micro parties.

 

Now, for the past few years, I have said that all of these Right-wing micro parties are a terrible thing! They are a waste of time! They needed to be wiped away. And I’ve also said that they’re run by these narcissistic fools who have to be leader. They have to be the main character in the story. You know, they’ve got a severe case of main character syndrome. And I said these micro parties will never, ever get anywhere. All they will be is these squabbling tiny groups that get absolutely drugged in elections, but keep conning their few supporters into believing that they are one day going to be a Parliamentary party. But Rupert Lowe has just swept them away in the stroke of a pen, he’s destroyed them all. And that’s actually what I predicted. If people look back and remember, I said some time ago that one of the great weaknesses of the micro party is as soon as a man with a bigger following and a larger purse comes along the micro parties are effectively dead. And they are! And this is good.

 

And it’s good because now ethno-nationalists can stop wasting their time. These parties needed to be wiped off the map. They needed to be shown up for what they are. And ethno-nationalists can do proper work now. They can either get involved with Restore. So if you’re in one of these micro parties and you want to get elected, get involved with Restore.

 

And if you want to be part of a street movement, get involved with a street movement. But don’t sit there following some jumped up little failed narcissist around, thinking that your party of 12 people is going to get to where Rupert Lowe is, because you’re not! You know, you’ve spent three, four years getting 250 members. He’s got 80,000 in a week! Let’s be real.!

 

And the reason this is in the good section of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly is because this is a wake up call. This is a slap around the face. It’s a cold bucket of water chucked over your head in the morning that gets you out of bed, on your feet. This is what nationalism needed for many reasons. This has proved me right, which I’m happy about, but it’s what we needed. Our people needed to see and to understand that wasting our time getting 1% in council elections was an absolute farce! It was a humiliation ritual! Let’s draw a line under it and let’s call out any of the people still operating these micro parties.

 

You know, and that doesn’t just count for ethno-nationalists, it also counts for civic nationalists. You know, it’s not just these ethno-nationalist micro parties that are doing it.

 

There’s also David Kurten and the Heritage Party. David, if you’re watching, I really like you. I think you’re a funny guy. I’d have you on my show. If I met you. I’d shake you by the hand. I think a lot of what you say makes real sense, but come on, mate, the Heritage Party are not getting to power. You’ve been eclipsed in less than a week, easily. You know, you’re somewhere there and Rupert somewhere up there. It’s time to close them down. We don’t need UKIP anymore. We don’t need the Heritage Party. We don’t need the NRP or the BNP or Homeland. All these parties have been rendered useless overnight. That’s a good thing. If we’re into politics, if we’re into electoral politics we need to get behind the most likely organisation to win!

 

Because if you’re not behind the most likely organisation to win, you’re actually in a very real way part of the problem.

 

[30:35]

 

Now, I said earlier, this moves the Overton Window, and it does. But it moves it in a way it’s never been moved before. It’s one thing for large groups of people to say things, it’s one thing for people like myself or somebody like Nick Griffin or somebody in the BNP to say these things. It’s different though, even for celebrities. You know, you might have something like John Cleese say:

 

“London isn’t English anymore!”

 

Well, great! I’m pleased he said that. But for a sitting MP to say this and to say this with Parliamentary privilege, this is a game changer! People don’t understand how important this is. We have never had an ethno-nationalist MP before.

 

And this is not just an ethno-nationalist MP, but it’s an ethno-nationalist MP who is independently wealthy, doesn’t need to go to people for funding. I mean, apparently the guy made something like 34 million. I think I heard him say that in an interview of one particular share deal. Well, this guy’s got so much money he could look after his family for the rest of their natural lives. For the rest of his grandkids natural lives, probably his great grandchildren several generations onward, and still fund this party without even noticing the money’s gone. This guy could effectively run a campaign that would easily eclipse the BNP’s best campaign and he wouldn’t know the money had gone. This is a good thing. This is a very good thing for the Overton Window. And it justifies all our points.

 

For years people like myself have been on the outside, locked out, hidden away, not allowed to speak, called Mad Men. Well, we were right all along. And this guy is justifying that. And he’s making our points not from a position of weakness where we make our points, but from a position of strength. And when these points are made from a position of strength and authority, they carry more weight. This is a good thing.

 

But there is one final thing I want to talk about that’s really good! I remember sitting in on Sam Melia’s trial when Sam Melia was stitched up! And I’ll tell you this, the thing the barrister said to him when he was questioning, everything was belittled:

 

“Well, who in the mainstream holds your views? You’re just a madman! The people you look up to are strange people who stream online. No one in the establishment feels this way. You’re so far from the mainstream that you’re a threat to us all, Sam Melia!”

 

Well, if Sam Melia was on trial today, things would be different. Nationalists who go on trial will not be faced with the question of:

 

“Why are you a freak, an outlier, an extremist?”

 

Because you can just fire back:

 

“Well, if I’m an extremist, so is Rupert Lowe, a sitting MP, and so are his 80,000 members!”

 

All of a sudden, this is different. He’s got the level of membership now that the Lib-Dems have. This is massive! And it gives us legitimacy, it gives us protection and it will also change the way the courts, the police and the CPS treat us. Because the things that I’ve been saying on these streams for years are now being said in Parliament. This is good!

 

And anyone that’s poo-pooing this, anyone that’s saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not really this!”

 

Look, forget it! That isn’t going to wash. You can’t argue against the positives of Rupert Lowe. You can’t argue against the way he’s putting over our arguments. And you can’t argue with over the fact this will offer us protection and it will also allow people who were scared to speak, the strength to speak. Don’t underestimate that either. There are going to be lots of people who’ve always felt this way but never said it, because the only person saying it was Mark Collett or Nick Griffin or John Tyndall.

 

But now the man saying is a sitting MP, the former chairman of Southampton Football Club, a multi-millionaire, a farmer, a man of the people! This is important. And it may well do for us what politicians have done elsewhere in the world, for different White countries, White nations, that now are waking up en masse and talking about things they weren’t before, because people in positions of power are saying what the people think and that gives the people strength. All of this is good and I’m hoping it will bring more people to our thinking.

 

Because this is all part of what I would call “The Great Awakening”. All of this is part of a process of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe hopefully millions of White Britons waking up to the reality of ethnicity, race, nation and the importance of bloodlines, lineage and not being replaced! And that’s what we’re all about. Remember, the goal here isn’t to have the biggest micro party. The goal here isn’t to be the last surviving tiny nationalist organisation to rule them all. The goal here is to wake people up, to make change and to ensure a future for our people.

 

And that means either A) making sure we aren’t replaced, or B), making sure that we have communities, that we have our own power bases if we are replaced and become minorities in certain areas of the country, depending on how things go forward. So that’s the good of I think there’s plenty of good there.

 

But with the good, the bad and the ugly, there’s also the bad and the ugly. And we’re going to start now with the bad for everything I’ve just said, these are early days, very early days! It’s less than a week old, and when you’re going through the early days, things always seem good. This is what you would call the honeymoon phase. This is the point where everyone is giving Rurpert Lowe the benefit of the doubt. It’s the point where everyone who wants to believe will think the best of Rupert Lowe. It’s the point where everything is fresh, where we can shoot for the moon, we can go all the way to the top. We can win everything, because we’ve never been tested. It’s like when an army marches off to war singing songs, believing that by Christmas the war will be over. They’re so sure of themselves. And before the first shots are fired, there is that feeling that anything can be achieved. And unfortunately, that isn’t reality. Unfortunately, there is a long fight ahead.

 

[37:54]

 

And at the moment, as we sing songs and march off together talking about how the glorious victory is on the horizon, Restore and Rupert are yet to fight the first battle. The first engagement hasn’t even happened. And whilst the guys marching off under his banner are singing songs now, they might not be singing songs quite as loudly or harmoniously when first contact occurs. When that first battle occurs, often morale changes dramatically.

 

And sometimes the first battle goes well and people will be like:

 

“Mark, I remember your stream when you said when the first battle comes, things may change!”

 

Sometimes you can be on the up. The BNP was on the up for 10 years when it finally got its knock, when it was finally knocked down, when it finally met its match, the damage done was so catastrophic it couldn’t recover. So bear in mind, we are in a honeymoon period. Things feel good now. There’s hope, People are buzzing.

 

But all of that masks problems that lie beneath the surface, that veneer of:

 

“Yes, we can do this! Yes, 80,000! Yes, ethno-nationalism! Yes, great interviews on TV! Yes, that tweet about being British being tied to ethnicity and to a lineage!”

 

All of that is making this honeymoon so good! And people are filled with all this hope. But that’s the honeymoon period. And later down the line, the marriage might not be as rosy as the honeymoon period. And I use the word “marriage” there for a very specific reason. A very specific reason, because Rupert Lowe is involved in a marriage of sorts. Rupert Lowe is bringing together many disparate groups. There are many factions uniting under Rupert’s banner to march off to war together. It is a courage of so many different supporters. You have just to name three. Tommy Robinson, you have Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin, you have Steve Laws and Zoomer. But that’s a toxic brew! That Steve Laws is a great guy, by the way. I’m not knocking Steve here. There are good people, good people supporting Rupert like Steve Laws.

 

But there are people that we wouldn’t like as much. You have the arch super Zionist Civnat football hooligan Tommy Robinson! Who for years has run his grift and worked for Israel. You have Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad who is dipping his toe into ethno-nationalism. But this man was a libertarian. This man was a race blind Civnat who believed that fundamentally anyone could be British if they subscribed to our value system. And you’ve got people like Steve Laws, who is a re-migration absolutist.

 

“Everyone must go! Every last one must go!”

 

Are these people gonna play nicely together? Are these people going to form an organisation together that will be stable? Or are they going to be factional rifts?

 

And like I said, they might all play nicely together on the honeymoon. They might all march off towards that first conflict singing songs together and not holding grudges. But when those first shots are fired and things don’t go so well, will they play nicely then? Will they be still singing in harmony? Will the marriage work when the couple come back from the honeymoon and realise that maybe whilst it was all good when they were sitting in the Bahamas drinking cocktails and enjoying the White Sandy beaches, their relationship doesn’t work as well when they’re back in rainy England in a little box having to do a 9 to 5 job, look after screeching children [chuckling] and keep the house, keeping the house tidy and paying the bills, things change. And things change a lot when organisations go through their growing pains. And I think there’s a lot there.

 

And I said a long time ago on the Farage versus Lowe stream, I said one problem that Lowe may have is he may surround himself. And this exact term I use was with a “toxic witch’s brew” of influencers, grifters and other ne’er-do-wells who all want a piece of him and want to drag him in different directions. And he’s been on an interview already with Sargon of Akkad, with Carl Benjamin. He’s on the Lotus Eaters! Well, how did that work out for poor old Gerard Batten? Remember, there is slight precedent for this. There is precedent for everyone getting behind a new leader to take on Farage. They all got behind Gerard Batten and it was a disaster! It went down like the Titanic. It was the Hindenburg of political experiments. It went down in flames. UKIP were completely destroyed. Nigel Farage stomped them so hard that he won the European election with the Brexit Party and left UKIP without a single seat. And he did that with the vote being split. Don’t forget that.

 

And remember, when you have all these people on board, when you have all of these different groups on board, when you have this witch’s brew, how is Rupert Lowe to respond to this? Who is he going to side with? How is he going to wave away the indiscretions? How is he going to wave away Tommy’s criminal past, his football hooliganism, all of the things that he’s involved in that put normal people off voting for him? And normal people won’t vote for Tommy. Tommy stood for elections and it was a disaster! How is he going to wave away Sargon’s indiscretions? Sargon, the man who famously sent rape tweets to Jess Phillips! I’m sort of quoting the media there. I’m not saying he actually did that allegedly, but that’s what the media said. Sargon’s also had some fruity interviews that people love quoting.

 

Rupert’s gonna have to answer for all of this, but he’s also going to have to answer for other people. If he teams up with Steve Laws, he’s going to have to answer why Steve says that every last person must go, even if they’ve got a drop of blood that isn’t White British. He’s going to have to answer for everyone’s comments.

 

[45:01]

 

And this is one of the reasons I haven’t got involved. This is one of the reasons I didn’t join up, because I don’t want him to have to answer for Young Nazi and Proud and all the things that I’ve said. [chuckling] I don’t want him to have to answer for what Mark Collett has said in the past. Because that’s not fair! And I actually do want him to be successful.

 

But all these people who are jumping on board with him, or some of them might not actually want him to be successful. They might be riding his coattails. They might be thinking, what can they get out of that? And really, you have here a very unstable support base, and you’re already seeing the beginning of infighting between these different supporters. You’ve got the Civnats already saying they wouldn’t sit with the people who support Steve Laws and Zoomer. You’ve got people like Tommy who will want to drag Rupert down the Zionist route. And there’s lots of people supporting Rupert who are ardent anti-zionists. And already they are saying:

 

“We don’t want Rupert having a Friends of Israel group.”

 

There are going to be some serious fractures in this when we get past the honeymoon period. Bringing people together who have such disparate views and who take their, what may be relatively small differences to those looking from the outside in, but they take those differences very seriously. This is going to be hard to manage. Holding his support base together is going to be very difficult.

 

And look, Nigel Farage gets accused of a lot of things. He gets accused of cucking all of the time. He gets accused of selling people out. He gets accused of throwing people under the bus, because he does! Nigel Farage disassociates with people when they use racial slurs or when they express openly Nazi views. He throws people under the bus when people say things which would be perceived as scary or racist. And we all have a go at him for that. We all say:

 

“Look, Nigel, you’re a cuck! You’re a man who won’t stick up for his own supporters, his own party members!”

 

And to that, well, I’m going to say this. Let’s look at both sides of this argument.

 

So on one hand, you hear me going on a BBC interview and I don’t throw anyone under the bus. I defend them all. And I smile and laugh in the face of the BBC reports. I’m like:

 

“I’m not kicking this guy out. He’s my friend. He’s got a right to his opinion! So what if he said this? I don’t care!”

 

And I can say that because I’m Mark Collett and I’m in charge of Patriotic Alternative. But Patriotic Alternative is not an electoral party. We are not a party that has to do well in elections to continue doing what we’re doing.

 

However, Nigel Farage is in charge of Reform. And Reform is graded on one thing alone. It’s graded on its electoral success. That is what every party is graded on. There is nothing else. It’s electoral success or nothing. I’ve said this before. There is one thing worse, sometimes for political parties than losing. There’s one thing worse than losing an election, and it can be winning an election. Because when you win an election, you have to do even better at the next election.

 

And that was one of the problems that hurt the BNP. I always remember the BNP started doing really well and then everyone expected it to do even better at the next elections. Sometimes it did. But when the BNP stumbled and things didn’t go so well, people left, people abandoned the party, people got dispirited and walked away. The problem with winning in the short term is you raise the bar for yourself. It’s like basically saying:

 

“Well, I want to be the world record high jumper. I want to be the best high jumper in the world.”

 

Well, at first it’s easy because you’re getting over the bar with relative ease, but the higher you jump, the higher you have to jump to keep impressing people. It’s the same with party politics. And Farage, he may be a cuck, but when he goes on television, people can’t credibly call him a Nazi, or a racist. When he goes on television, he doesn’t have to answer for what 2, 3, 4 dozen people have said on Facebook and Twitter because he kicked them out. And yeah, he’s a cuck, he’s a cuck!

 

But I remember when I was in the BNP, and I remember every time there was an interview, every time Nick Griffin went on an interview, Nick Griffin had to answer for what dozens of people had said. He had to answer for Mark Collett and Young Nazi and Proud. He had to answer for Tony Lecomber and Tony Lecomber’s ill spent youth where he took a oversized firework to a Left-wing bookshop with the intention of blowing it up. You know, they called him Tony the Bomber Lecomber!

 

And I’m not having to go at Tony, but what I am saying is Nick had to answer for him. Nick had to answer for me. He had to answer for numerous people. I remember in the run up to one of the local elections, one of the newspapers ran a headline called “All Women All Nazis” and it was basically a front page that pictured all the women who stood for the BNP that had said or done slightly fruity things.

 

[50:59]

 

And then somebody has to go, whether it was Nick Griffin or Simon Darby. Somebody has to go on TV and answer that. And it meant every one of your interviews was maybe 20 minutes long. And it was 15 minutes of answering:

 

“Well, this Nazi said, this racist said this!”

 

And it made the party far less electable than it could have been. Now, to the credit of the BNP, we stood by our people and we didn’t cuck. But the party doesn’t exist anymore. Nigel Farage does cuck. And it’s very hard for them to call him a racist, or a Nazi. And because of that, he’s far more electable. Because the British people are scared of terms like racist and Nazi. People say:

 

“Oh, well, I’m not scared of it anymore. People are less scared than they used to be.”

 

Well, maybe not. But this does make a difference. And I’ve been there, I’ve seen it, I’ve lived it, I know it! And this brings us to the next point. And people are going to be very upset that I’m saying this, but this is a warts and all breakdown.

 

Let’s discuss the Nazi question!

 

At some point, Rupert Lowe is going to be held up, and he is going to have to answer for someone in his party who has supported Hitler, who has called somebody a racial slur, somebody who said that they wish the outcome of the Second World War was different. Maybe somebody who said:

 

“Well, we need a man like the Austrian painter today, because if he was going to invade Britain today, I certainly wouldn’t be Manning the gun turrets. I’d be pointing him all the way to Downing Street!”

 

People will say that! They say it in Reform, [chuckling] so they’re gonna say it in Rupert Lowe’s party! Because Rupert is going to take a lot of people that Reform wouldn’t take. That’s a fact. And Rupert Lowe is going to have to go on TV at some point and answer for people in his organisation that have said things like that, in his party that have said things like that. How will he react? Will he cuck? I don’t know. Will he not cuck? I don’t know. But I’ll tell you one thing. When people go down this party political route, the pressure to sell out and to cuck and to chuck your friends under the bus is huge! Because there’s always somebody stood behind the curtain whispering in your ear:

 

“If you just get rid of them, people will get on board! If you just stop saying this, people will get on board! If you just remove paragraph 2 of your statement on deportation, people will get on board! If you just get rid of your forced repatriation policy and make it voluntary, people will get on board!”

 

And the BNP went through that. The BNP dropped things. The BNP dropped its forcd repatriation policy under, was it Nick Griffin or was it John Tyndall? I can’t remember. I think it was Nick Griffin and the forced repatriation. Yeah, it was under Nick Griffin. Nick Griffin dropped the forced repatriation policy because it was deemed to be unfair, unjust and the public couldn’t get behind it. He said:

 

“Look, we do need people going back, but it has to be done on a voluntary paid basis! A voluntary paid basis because we can’t sell to the people that we’re going to go door to door dragging people out the house.”

 

This was Nick Griffin in the BNP. So what’s Rupert Lowe going to do? How’s he going to answer these questions now? My answer is, I don’t know! I can’t tell you, because I can’t. I’m good at making predictions, but I don’t have a crystal ball that gives me the exact future. But when he’s on TV, when he’s got that desire for more members, when he’s got that desire for an extra 0.5% on the vote, when he wants to go even mains more mainstream than he has, the pressure will be poured on him. Nigel Farage caved into that pressure and it has undoubtedly worked for Nigel Farage. The BNP didn’t, we didn’t. We were more hardcore, we were more principled. We stuck by our people. And PA absolutely sticks by its people!

 

But the fact is the BNP never achieved what it could have achieved. Two MEPs was the high point. A member of the GLA. All we ever achieved was big wins in proportional representation elections. We never won big First Past the Post elections. And that’s going to hurt people’s feelings! But it’s true! Look it up! You can get mad at what I’m saying, it can upset you, what I’m saying. You can download the video, but what I’m saying is true!

 

Now, as I said earlier, this is why I haven’t joined.

 

This is why I don’t want to be involved. I support the guy, I like what he’s saying. But if Mark Collett got involved and Rupert Lowe had to answer for what member number 80, 256 said, and member number 80, 256 said:

 

“I’m drawn to a racially pure White society!”

 

I said that in an interview with a newspaper when I was in my early 20s, probably about 20 years old, maybe 21. I said on TV, I made jokes about things that I probably shouldn’t have joked about. They were silly, they were crass, they were embarrassin, looking back on them! I don’t want Rupert to have to answer for that. And I don’t want him to have to, every time he goes on TV they say:

 

“Well, what about Mr. Young Nazi and Proud? What about him, eh? What are you gonna do about him?”

 

But he’s gonna have to do that with someone else, and thankfully it ain’t gonna be me and we’ll see how we react. But if I was a betting man, which I’m not, I’d say there’ll be more cucking than a lot of people now will like to think there will be. Because the allure of power and the allure of going mainstream is usually too great for most people. And once you’re in that party political sphere, even if you’re the BNP, there is some cucking!

 

[57:23]

 

Now, the next point of the bad is, can he actually succeed with this ethno-nationalist argument?

 

Now, I was talking about this earlier night on PWR with Hugh Anthony. There is this sort of feeling that as things get worse, which they are doing, as more migrants come here, more people are going to vote for an ethno-nationalist alternative. And that might be true, but as more migrants come here, inevitably there is more integration. There are 21 million people living in Britain who are not classified as White British, so have some kind of migrant background. And unfortunately this is a hard pill to swallow. So get your glass of toxic blue energy drink, get your cup of tea, whatever you need to help you swallow the pill, because it’s coming.

 

Unfortunately, many White Britons are more bothered about how they will be perceived by their one non-White friend, non-White family member, non-White work colleague, than they are about the future of their own race.

 

This is because we have this suicidal empathy. We have a problem as a people. We are more bothered about the feelings of our one of the one non-White outlier that we like than we are about the future of our people. Now that’s not the people here tonight, that’s not the people watching this stream because we are the die hard ethno-nationalists, the people who find Mark Collett on Rumble and Odysee, even though he’s banned on everywhere else. But we are outliers. And Rupert Lowe has got to sort, has got to sell that to the public. Can it be sold? Yes, there are more people than ever angry about immigration, but there are more people than ever before with mixed race family members, with nephews and nieces and grandsons and granddaughters and daughters who have married black men and sons who have gone to Thailand and brought back a Thai bride. There are more people than ever before who have a non-White friend. These are problems that Rupert Lowe will have to face.

 

And why am I saying this? Why am I bringing this up when I talked about it the other night? I’m bringing this up because there’s a lot of people who support Rupert Lowe’s that are real ideologues and say:

 

“Look, not one drop, not one member, not one person!”

 

Well, I’m going to tell you now, Rupert Lowe will have non-White people in the party. Rupert Lowe will have people standing for him who are not White British. That is going to happen. And this is going to be interesting because there’s a lot of people in our movement, there’s a lot of ethno-nationalists who have said over the last few years:

 

“Look, there’s Farage with another non-White candidate. There’s a Pakistani candidate standing for Reform, there’s an Indian candidate standing for Reform, there’s a White woman standing for Reform. And look, she’s got a black husband and three mixed race children!”

 

There is a real likelihood that Rupert Lowe will do this as well. And at this point, how are people going to react? Are people going to say:

 

“Yeah, we’re going to forgive that.”

 

Or are they going to react to him in the same way that they reacted to Farage? Are they going to react to him in the same hostile way? Are they going to start calling him a cuck and nagging him and throwing mud at him? Or are they just going to get their head down and carry on? Because this is going to happen.

 

And it’s going to happen for several reasons. Because firstly, I don’t think Rupert Lowe is a racist. I think black man came to Rupert Lowe and said he wanted to stand for him. I don’t think Rupert Lowe would have a bad word to say to him, number one.

 

And secondly, it would be illegal to stop those people coming forward and standing as candidates anyway. And if you were found to be stopping candidates from standing solely on the basis of their race, you’d be in big trouble and your party would likely be deregistered and you would be facing a massive lawsuit from the Equalities Commission. So this is going to happen. How will people deal with it? I don’t know!

 

Now the next thing I want to talk about, which is the bad, is how Rupert is going to sell re-migration. And this is a big issue because, look, I believe in re-migration, but I’m not one of these people who goes around parroting “re-migration is inevitable”. Remigration is absolutely not inevitable.

 

And when you look at what Trump’s done in America, the few deportations that have actually happened over there, the hostile environment that is perceived to have been built against migrants, it’s actually scared the crap out of lots of White people! At one point, Whites were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to do some deportations!”

 

You see one Somalian family on the news with handcuffs on being led off, and all of a sudden, half the White people who wanted deportations are terrified! You got people like Joe Rogan who were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to sort this country out! Oh, my God, Trump’s going too far. This is like Hitler 2.0!”

 

What I’m saying here is Rupert Lowe has to not only get over the Nazi issue, the cucking issue, has to bring all these disparate groups together and make them play nice, but he also has to sell something that does, to some degree, scare people. And when it gets implemented and people see the reality of it scares some people who voted for it. And I’ve likened this to making an omelet. There are people out there that will go to the chef and say:

 

“I want an omelette. Please make me a large omelette!”

 

And the chef’s like:

 

“Sure.”

 

Starts breaking the eggs.

 

[xx:xx]

 

And then the guys order the omelettes in tears:

 

“Oh, what are you doing? What are you doing? They’re breaking all these eggs. It’s bloody terrible. Stop breaking the eggs!”

 

“But you wanted the omelet.”

 

“Yeah, I want the omelette.”

 

“Well, I need to break the eggs.”

 

“But I don’t want any eggs getting broken!”

 

You’d be a madman. But that’s how White people behave. I’m not talking about you guys in the chat. I’m not talking about the good ethno-nationalists here. I’m talking about the people who’ve been infected with the disease of suicidal empathy. Look:

 

“There’s a load of migrant rapists down there. Deport them!”

 

“Right, let’s get the handcuffs on, boys.”

 

“What are you handcuffing families for?”

 

“Well, you said deport them.”

 

“Well, there’s a woman there who’s been handcuffed.”

 

“Yeah, she’s the wife of one of the guys that was raping the little girls, and she helped cover it up. She gave false evidence in court.”

 

“Yeah, but she’s a woman and she’s pregnant. Oh!”

 

“So what? Get rid of them!”

 

And you’ve got to remember Rupert Lowe again. They should have gone in the good section, is a principled guy. One of the reasons he fell out with Farage is both him and Farage agreed that people who had groomed and sexually abused White girls must be deported. But Rupert went further and said:

 

“We’re not just deporting the ones who did the grooming and committed the crimes. We’re going to deport the communities and the families that were accomplices, that covered for it, that sheltered this, that knew about it and didn’t report it to the police.”

 

I agree with him! Brilliant! Amazing policy. And Farage. Screw you for not supporting that! Screw you, Farage, for being a sellout! But unfortunately, re-migration is not inevitable. It’s a hard sell at times because our people are so bloody weak! This is an issue. It’s an issue he will face.

 

And it’s not just an issue when it comes to the ballot box. It’s an issue when it comes to people like Tommy Robinson. When it comes to people like Sargon. What’s Sargon gonna say if Rupert Lowe says:

 

“We need to start handcuffing families.”

 

You know, just the other day, Tommy Robinson was outside the Iranian embassy talking about how we need more Iranians here because the Iranian community, community in Britain is brilliant! Well, no, it’s not. No, it’s not, Tommy! Iranian nationalists and Iranian nationals living in Britain are 18 times more likely to be arrested for sexual crimes than White British men. 18 times! We don’t need them here. Tommy would be crying. He’d be weaponizing his supporters. If Rupert Lowe really embarked on a proper campaign of re-migration, a lot of his support base, their knees would start trembling, because we have a mental disease as a people! Our empathy, which should be solely focused on people within our group, has been spread to everyone!

 

So now we’re more empathetic to other people than we are our own people. We have more empathy for the communities that do horrible things to us than we do to the White victims of those foreign communities! Now, what I’m saying is not a lie. It’s true. This is how it works.

 

Unfortunately, Rupert Lowe is going to have to overcome this. And this is not just a problem he’ll have to overcome with the electorate, but with people within his own ranks.

 

Now, the final part of the bad is this. 80,000 members, it seems like a lot, but the Green Party have over 170,000 members, and they only get 9% of the vote. He’s got less than half of what the Green Party have got. What’s that going to get him? 4%? Maybe more, maybe less. I don’t know. People might say they’ll end up with 170,000 members by the next general election. Great! But 9% of the vote wouldn’t cut it. Maybe getting one or two seats nationwide. A lot of what we’re seeing now is talk on social media, talk on YouTube, and it can be a bubble! It can be this horrible situation where you think you have more support than you do.

 

I remember and I’ve spoke to Steve Laws about this today. He’s given me permission to use this as an example. I’m not negging Steve. We’re going to talk more about this later, actually, but I’m going to introduce this now. Steve Laws, hundreds of thousands of followers across different social media platforms, yet when he stands in election, he gets just over 1%.

 

Now, that’s not to knock Steve. Steve’s a fantastic guy! And Steve bloody deserved to win those elections. He’d have made a great councillor and a great MP. But often you can have millions of followers, you could have thousands of people sign up and you can think everything is gonna go well. But it doesn’t result in much. Tommy Robinson can put 300,000 people on the streets, but when he stood in election, he got nowhere. He failed dismally.

 

Gerard Batten, look at all the influencers he got on board. Look at the social media imprint he built. Absolutely smashed! Things that happen on X don’t necessarily transfer to the real world. It wasn’t that long ago that the Homeland Party were being bigged up and everyone was like:

 

“Look the re-migration is going to begin soon!”

 

They got trashed. They got the most embarrassing results any ethno-nationalist party has ever got in local council elections. And that was when everyone was talking them up. The problem is, we get so close to this. We get so when you’re so close to something and you focus so much on something that’s right in front of you, you can’t see the big picture.

 

[1:09:17]

 

And also, when you’re close to something, perspective makes you believe it’s bigger than it really is. You end up only speaking to the people who tell you:

 

“Well, I’m voting for you, mate. I’m on board. This tweet’s got 40,000 likes. That’s going to get us over the line!”

 

It doesn’t work like that. It didn’t work like that in the BNP. Back in the day you could get a meeting going in part of Leeds and there’d be so many people that there was standing room only. You would be out on the street, people would be beeping their horn. Everyone was voting for you down the Working Men’s Club. And you got 20%. And labour won the vote with like 45%. They won it easily.

 

The problem is you don’t speak to everyone. You speak to people within your bubble. And when it comes down to it, there’s going to be all these pressures. There’s going to be these disparate supporters. You’re going to have the dirty members, the Nazis. There’s going to be pressure on him to clean his party up. There’s going to be pressure on him. There’s going to be the kosher money, the jewish influence.

 

Now there’s people like me who’ve been doing this for 26 years. I’ve never cucked! But where am I today? [chuckling] I mean not to rubbish myself, but I’m nowhere. I’m sat on Rumble and Odysee, you know, streaming to 500 people! Now that’s what not cucking gets you. I can go to sleep with a clean conscience and a smile on my face because I’ve never cucked, and I’ve always talked about the important things. But I’m not getting elected to Parliament, am I? And this is gonna be a big issue. Men are easily corrupted! And at the moment he’s doing a good job of not being corrupted. But when he gets the tap on the shoulder, are we going to see the purges? Are we going to see the multiracial candidate slates? Are we going to see the Restore Friends of Israel? I hope not. I hope not! He is going to have to do some of those things. He will have non-White candidates, but I hope he doesn’t go down this route that I’ve just laid out.

 

But I think to some degree he will because he’s going to be pulled in that direction by people who are part of his supporter base. And that supporter’s base is somewhat of a toxic witch’s brew.

 

So that’s the bad! So are you guys ready for the ugly?

 

Because there is an ugly.

 

And what is going to be the ugliest part of this is the fight between Rupert Lowe and Restore and Nigel Farage and Reform. That fight is going to be the most bitter and horrible thing you can imagine. There will be all sorts of dirty Tricks. There will be stolen membership lists, there will be people emailing people using those membership. There’ll be all sorts, all sorts of nasty games!

 

And I’ll tell you this now, the bitterness and the hatred between those two parties will eclipse the bitterness and hatred those two parties have for Labour and the Tories. Restore and Reform will spend more time fighting each other than they will fighting the Reds. And I know this because I have seen splits in nationalism. I’ve lived through them. I’ve seen the hatred they build.

 

And we saw this when Homeland split away from PA, there was people in Homeland, and I’ve been told this by an ex-Homeland member who I met the other weekend and reconciled with at the Warwick demo. And he said to me:

 

“One of the things that never sat easily with him was the amount of people in that organisation who spent the majority of their time creating fake profiles to spread rumours about PA.”

 

They spent more time doing that than they did actually campaigning for Homeland. That’s one of the reasons it failed.

 

There was one guy who was particularly bitter and nasty and he would spend his evenings ringing around our young members saying:

 

“Look, I know you’re gonna stay with PA and I’m cool with that, but I just I’m not saying you should come to Homeland, but PA are going to be banned in two weeks. We’ve had a big tip off, and I’m just letting you know because I don’t want you getting arrested and being part of a banned organisation!”

 

Well, that never happened. But that’s the kind of horribleness that goes on. And when that horribleness goes on, it doesn’t actually benefit either of the parties that are engaged in it.

 

In fact, most people who are exposed to that kind of infighting and negativity will end up just leaving the movement altogether. They just leave both parties because they didn’t get involved for that. Most normal people don’t get involved to be embroiled in this horrible, horrible infighting! That’s just how it is.

 

And unfortunately, we’re already seeing that because people have been celebrating all weekend:

 

“There are new Restore Party councillors. There are new., …”

 

Well, they’re not. They’re just Reform Party councillors that have gone to Restore. There hasn’t been a single new Restore Party candidate voted in, not a single actual victory. All there’s been is Reform going to Restore.

 

[1:14:58]

 

So the number of populist Right councillors has remained exactly the same. People are just saying:

 

“Oh, well, we took some off you. We didn’t take seats from the Labour Party.”

 

Restore haven’t got three new councils elected and cost Labour three seats. Restore haven’t just taken a council away from the Tory Party and actually smashed part of the establishment. All they’ve done is pull people away from another populist Right party. And the anger here, unfortunately will be aimed more at Nigel Farage and what Reform are doing than it will be at Keir Starmer and what Keir Starmer is doing.

 

And this totally mirrors what happened in Russia when the Bolsheviks came to power. The Red Army was a united force. The White army wasn’t. The resistance to the Bolsheviks was disunited. The generals wouldn’t talk to each other, wouldn’t share information with each other, wouldn’t work together, wouldn’t fight alongside each other because they all had these little problems with each other and they lost. Rather than standing together as one. They were eaten piecemeal by the Bolsheviks and crushed. And what did that lead to? Well, we all know, and as I said all of this fighting will cause more people to drop out than it will to move over to other organisations.

 

Just look at what happened in the National Front. The National Front split in 1980 and it became the New National Front. There was another split in 1986 which became the Flag National Front. You know, at certain times there were actually two National Front paper sales on the same street in the same city centre selling a paper that talked about exactly the same issues. And the public would have been like:

 

“Didn’t I just see you down there?”

 

“No, no, they’re a totally different organisation!”

 

And that bitterness, these internal strives, these fights are things that weigh the movement down. They weigh the movement down and what they end up doing is putting more people off. Because look, we’re not normies. The people watching this stream tonight, we are not normies. That’s just not who we’re not people who have come to this movement as normal sort of hanger on people. I’m not saying we’re all weirdos or anything, but we’re just not normies. We’re not part of normal life. We, we’re deeply political people, so we’re going to stick with it no matter what. But normal people who say:

 

“Look, I’m finally getting involved!”

 

They don’t get involved to hear about infighting and that.

 

“Actually this guy over here who’s standing for this party, that’s kind of like us, he’s the real bad guy!”

 

They hate this! And this always happened in the BNP. Whenever there was any infighting, the people who emerged as the winners, always emerged to rule over a depleted and damaged organisation. That’s just how it is.

 

And whilst this war is kicking off, whilst Restore are going toe to toe with Reform, actually the opposite’s happening on the Left. The Left are sticking together. Labour are going into partnership with the Greens to lock out a populist Right-wing government.

 

And what we’re seeing here is at a crucial time in our history, the Right-wing, which is often prone to these splits, is having one of these splits. And the ugliest part of this is Restore could actually end up stopping Reform from winning a general election. They could fight each other to a standstill or Reform could stop Restore. They’ll end up fighting each other to a standstill.

 

Now, let’s have a look at this. Let’s have a look at reality. In 99, 2000, we made up, White Britons, made up 90% of the population in Britain. By 2024, 2025, we made up 70% of the population in Britain. Over 25 years, a quarter of a century, our share of the population declined by 20%, 0.8% per year.

 

Now, I believed that the last real chance to turn things around was the BNP in the 2000s.

 

But we’ve been thrown this last, last chance now. And that’s what was being built at the last, last, last, last, last chance we’ll ever have! But I’ll tell you this infighting could blow it and it could grant Labour five more years of power.

 

Now, look, if we went from 90% to 70% in 25 years, well, 25 years from now, we’ll be a minority. And five more years of Labour would take us to 2034. We’d only have 16 years left.

 

And at that point we’d have more immigrants voting against us, more people married to immigrants, more integration, more people who are depressed. It would be harder to do it further down the line. The closer you get to a minority, the harder it is to do it. The more multiracial, the more multicultural you become, the harder it is to do things.

 

I was looking at the next general election and I had three objectives at that next general election. And I honestly, I wanted Reform to win the next general election general election. And I wanted them to win for three reasons. Not because I love Nigel Farage, not because I thought that they would bring about a government I would actually want to see, but for three reasons.

 

Firstly, I wanted them to smash the old parties. I wanted them to mortally wound Labour in White working class areas. And I wanted them to destroy the Conservative Party for good. Because the Conservative Party has been the party which has held nationalists back post Second World War. Every time Nationalist parties have got big, the Conservatives come in, talk about little bit about immigration, everyone goes and votes for them and we have lost. That is always how it has worked! I wanted them smashing!

 

The second thing, I thought Farage might have slightly slowed out a climb down. I need to buy us time. We need to buy us time. Somebody needs to buy us time. We’re on the Titanic. Water’s coming into the ship, right? We may not be able to save the vessel, but imagine if less water was coming in. That would be a good thing because it buys you time to get people to the lifeboats.

 

[1:21:20]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:00:35]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/21/2026 = 446)

Mark Collett
7 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

1
0
Konstrukt
1 hour ago(edited)
Do we :
1. become ethnically self-conscious like our ancestors all other groups now living here and start acting in our own best interests?.
Or
2. continue to pretend we have no rights or grouo interests, cede more and more Power to invading , exclusive foreign groups and wonder off without a peep into the long dark night.

Pria’s Thoughts
2 hours ago
Mark i feel you are being completely vindicated. i found you guys about 7 years ago and its been quite a ride. you have never wavered. you and Laura and Joe and many others have been put through hell when all you were doiing was telling the truth. its knackering. just swatting away the idiots on X is knackering but years of plugging away, sharing evidence, setting out arguments, changing minds is coming to fruition. the genie is out of the lamp and it isn’t going back. Rupert is the man we need. more than ever. He seems like a good man. the more we support him the more confidence he will get. i will never forget everything you and PA have done up until this point.

1
0

@GazChamberz
2 hours ago
Schlomo of Akaad

1
0
Hide replies
Konstrukt
1 hour ago
Saegon of Moszad

1
0
Alice1488
2 hours ago
I’ve come to have respect for Rupert Lowe. I think he’s genuine though time will tell. I don’t think he’ll split the vote, I think he’ll win at the election if we all put our faith in him and take a chance on him!

1
0
Collatz
3 hours ago
At some level it’s good Steve is out there, but Mark would make a far better and more balanced representative w/in Restore for genuine ethnonationalists. Ngl I’m massively trepidatious seeing Rupert’s history over the last two years, but if it’s to be I can only hope he and PA have the strongest voice possible in its growth.

2
0

@RonP1
3 hours ago(edited)
A few obvious questions for Restore.
What is your opinion regarding that little State in the Middle East
What is your policy regarding Jewish influence on British affairs
What is your policy regarding Secret Societies
What is your plan regarding Britain’s foreign-controlled monetary system
As Arnold Leese correctly said, Democracy is Death by Jewry.
The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.

3
0
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
“Democracy is Death by Jewry.”
As if we had democracy. The truth: Actual democracy would be the death of Jewish power.
“The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.”
Exactly. We have plutocracy, not democracy.

1
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 hours ago(edited)
That’s what the quote is saying,
Democracy is Death by Jewry, Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry & it will lead to your death.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago(edited)
“Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry.”
The version of “democracy” we have is NOT democracy. Or anything even close. Jewish culture and mentality is elitist, totalitarian, intolerantly exclusive, predatory and fiercely supremacist, thus profoundly anti-democratic. What we have had is, as I said, plutocracy, not democracy. We have fraudulent stage-managed pseudo-democracy with real power exercised from behind the scenes by capitalist elites – with Jews as the dominant element among the elites.

0KT0BER
4 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago
goodnight all

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
G’night all good white people.

1
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Where is debate with David Clews and Alek Yerbury to be found?

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
14
nighty night!

Sir Trancealot
5 hours ago
14

jm
5 hours ago
it was a good stream, very well

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/2024620452639830224

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Nights folks

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Hail Victory o/

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Thanks Mark

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
I enjoyed last hour

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
Great show thanks Mark

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
lol okay

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
no i’d miss things

JamesL
5 hours ago
musk has banned me several days ago

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
What if we put all backs on the moon. Total dark side of the mmoon

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
just refresh

withey
5 hours ago
i had to pause the stream i’m on a time lag

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
We need to put a black man on the moon so he can scatter chicken bones on the surface.

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
“another man on the moon”? lol

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
The one that gives superhuman strength.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@withey
“blue milk”

withey
5 hours ago
it looks like the sci-fi drinks in films

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that would be better – lol

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
I’d like to see them lose something else.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Looking forward to the day the Tory party is destroyed and hundreds of Tory traitors lose their seats

2
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@USSA
Shameful.

God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
we bomb the shit out of their country and then give them free healthcare zz you can’t put your hate on them

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
haha

@MilosM.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Never saw that one in a while.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago

@SOA
No Remorse.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
copy that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck%27s_Brewery

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Dafuq is that blue fluid? You’ll getting poisoned, Mark.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s another bait monger just ignore

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
makes me*

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@VesselofGrace
Sorry buddy, I don’t believe your Jew God. If you believe that makes me dull and your enemy you have bigger problems to deal with than me.

1
0
God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
I do think white people have used their supremacy for more evil than good and we need to balance it out. God loves all people

0
3

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Becky? Beckie?

0
1

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I don’t know that, but I think that’s pretty known by now, I mean for someone interested in the Bible and Christianity in general.

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that wasn’t promised it was inferred, and we didn’t get real brexit, it was brino

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
a beer!

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Collett is one of the few who wouldn’t ever sell out. Easy to trust someone like that

3
0
Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Failure to use TheHolyChristianBible against SatanicJeews would be Idiotic and Subversive.

1
1
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I can’t believe Farage is still politically relevant after lying about Brexit telling people that the $250 million will go to the NHS.

1
0
Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
People need to stop caring about the “magic book” theory. It doesn’t change people, in fact it actively hurts whites’ racial preference. Stop caring about the Bible and start caring about your family (your people).

1
0
withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
of course it doesn’t matter, but it would be intereing to know to get an idea of what was at play and why

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
The whole Barbour jacket, black ‘lab’ & Ye Olde chocolate box village aesthetic are exactly the same as Farage was doing 10 years ago. Lowe is just as phoney and his politics stink. Thatcherite guff mixed with Muslims! Muslims! Muslims! Rhetoric. Count me out as a member of the Tribe once said…

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Eh, historians and theologists, I guess.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
but who wrote those sources?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
eh… no. All sources point he translated the bible from hebrew to the greek. The first who did so. I think he is most known by that.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
get Russell on the show Mark, he needs a promo lift these days lol

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
definitely

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I prefer 1933 politics

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark, I asked you a question in Telegram DM.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
wasn’t greek the lingua franca of the time so surely the jews wrote it in hebrew and greek?

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
Lots of people who should know better are jumping in with both feet. The level of naivete is hard to fathom…

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
a jew who passes as a jew is a jew, it all boils down to aesthetics and mindset

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Reform will be worse because the Zionists funding them will tell them to persecute real nationalists…

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
M C

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Apostle Paul. Who translated Bible to Greek the first,

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
The first Greek translation of the Bible was the Septuagint of the 3rd-2nd centuries BC. The Pentateuch was translated in the 3rd century BC and most of the rest of the Hebrew Bible in the 2nd century BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Peled has described his book, The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine (2012),[2] as an account of how he, “the son of an Israeli General and a staunch Zionist, came to realize that “the story upon which I was raised … was a lie.”[3]

Kevin
5 hours ago

@withey
You’re retarded. Are Koreans like 60% Italian, 15% German?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
paul?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it boils down to do they pass, which means both aesthetics and mindset

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Wrong war(s) Fatigue.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Same like Paul.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
he’s still trapped in that ‘Germans bad’ box

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
According to Peled: “Israel has been on a mission to destroy the Palestinian people for over six decades. Why would anyone not give solidarity to the Palestinian people?”[16 Peled has written that the “IDF lusts for blood, accused Israeli officials of “ethnic cleansing.”[18]

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
White People War Fatigue.

withey
5 hours ago

@Philip.Kollberg
don’t give brother nathaniel any attention he’s a jew who’s larping as a christian nothing more

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miko_Peled#Views

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
and the most pro-Nature

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
But, unironically, I would award Michael Douglas and Harrison Ford with the ‘white’ title.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Contrary to popular Lies. Nationalist White people are the most Anti•War, Peace Path people on the planet.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
i dont know this person, sadly?

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white. according to jews
https://forward.com/community/405016/no-ashkenazi-jews-are-not-functionally-white/

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Miko Peled sounds based, for someone who grew in zionist family.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
koreans are not white, light shade of coloured skin is just that

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Some Jews actually see themselves as white. Caucasian white. Most find it just a secondary or even tertiary thing.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
they aren’t. They descended from about 350 people in the Middle East.

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Brother Nathaniel

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Bring some Jew to the show (that is anti-Ron Unz).

Kevin
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
So what? They are white. Ironically saying that pissed more Jews off than anyone else because most of them deny their majority European ancestry

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Elon is proving to be very useful for white cause. Even though, he is not one of us.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
W

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
if you’re in the US, join Patriot Front

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Sweden democrats apeasing Israel.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And slaves, and native Americans and whites of different stocks. All fighting against other whites in the name of…being free of the taxes.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Empathy for the Devil aka SatanicJeews.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Elon also said that Jews are peak white…

Kevin
5 hours ago
Elon also is giving Lowe support. He posted a picture of his parents and grandparents in Britain and said “We can’t let our homeland fall”

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
stupid argument. White is still white. If you’re talking about the slaves, I agree that it was the worst mistake the US ever made.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Alek Yerbury compared Rupert Lowe’s policies to Margaret Thatcher’s.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
They should have joined PA

jm
5 hours ago
so, would it be better if >Rupert Lowe went the way of activism but not parlementarisme ?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
America is diluted anyways. Since its inception.

Kevin
5 hours ago
It is within First Past the Post systems and in the British system specifically

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I don’t think a Reform gov with Farage as MP will be as damaging as a Labour gov.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I am afraid that some unpopular leaders may be necessary, but Reagan was very based on JQ. But I guess it proves that you don’t have to be pro-semitic to be based and vice-versa.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Any president who dilutes the essence of what an American used to be (a white person of moral character) is shite. So pretty much every president

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Legal migration to USA is hard af fuk

withey
5 hours ago
i back the strongest message

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
“Anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American.” — President Ronald Reagan (January 19, 1989)

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Reagan*

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Illegals, criminals and immigrants who want to go home if paid are easy wins. We can all agree with that.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)
Reagan was a plant who allowed 3 million illegal migrants to stay in the US. To hell with him

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
And he turned against them.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
i agree rupert feels better than farage as primeminister

Kevin
5 hours ago
Farage is surrounded by very questionable people: conservatives who brought the migrations, muslims, etc.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
Reagan was handpicked by them

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
At least Reagan was anti-Jewish during his tenure.

Kevin
5 hours ago
I actually think people don’t like Farage as much as you think. They are just the only other option. Farrage comes across as a clown, not a prime minister. Lowe looks like a prime minister – that is imporant

withey
5 hours ago

@Hillbrow
we must sink him, hopefully racism will see him flee

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
It is imperative that the BBC are dismantled and exported to West Africa.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
like Reagan did the American people, thatcher did massive damage to the British people

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I think both can be useful as long as they don’t work against each other.

withey
5 hours ago
rupert will work hard, we must sink farage,

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
We use to call it ‘fake opposition’.

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
where does anyone named habib fit in?

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
it seems to be an absolute truth that people will carry hope until they are starving

withey
5 hours ago
very true the fake ukip stole ukip votes because people didn’t check the wording

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
problem is 19 from that are working for the jewish controlled government.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It produced however the greater unity and awareness of some crucial ideas which probably wouldn’t happen if he wasn’t elected. Whatever you think, having a central political figure is the only way to go.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
I thought being locked down and forced to be jabbed would wake up most people-sadly not

Kevin
5 hours ago
Then having a big nationalist party will just transition to a resistance movement with high profile leaders

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
80/20 rule. 80% are cattle, 20% know what’s going on. half of those people are in power and the other half is us lol

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
No. We’re separating. Geogralicalky and socially

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
At least you will always have your mandela statue in trafalgar square

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
*that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I’m quite frankly astonished the most people are still normies. They listened to lies on TV and when they go out and see the opposite they still believe the TV.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
We are pulling apart

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
there’s quite a bit here in the States.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
I blame the cocksucking males.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Actualky there’s very little inter breeding

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people united around Trump. They believed in him. That has turned out great hasn’t it?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
idiots cause trouble and leave

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It won’t help also to spread blackpills and demoralization. People need a figure they could unite around.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I noticed that myself with some white nationalist groups. People infight then always someone leaves it.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people only need hope in themselves. That’s easy if you know yourself and your strengths and utilize them. Those who need to cope with lies won’t accomplish anything meaninful

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
People need hope. If people became self-deprecated and hopeless about the political solution, that only leads to more misery and hell.

Kevin
5 hours ago
This example is bunk. The real comparison is if the White Army tried to unite with the Mensheviks

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
If they look english i trust them lol. even if theyre wrong on some things

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
my new working theory

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Are you talking Mark about Wyvern the Terrible?

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The brst way to know who to truat : Physiognomy.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
If Lowe succeeds, hope is kindled. If he doesn’t, more people will become disaffected and believe there is no political solution. I think it’s a win-win

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
I hope so

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
59 B.C. Cicero criticized the Jews of Rome for their perceived political power and presence in public assemblies. He famously noted their solidarity, suggesting they “stick together” and could exert significant influence over court proceedings through their numbers and organized presence.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Cultural Standardisation causes alienation

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Also, Edward II expelled Jews in the 12th century from UK.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@AlexandreL
this is a classic argument by supporters of the Constitution and the Bible. It really doesn’t matter what these documents used to mean, it matters what role they play in society now.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I don’t see blacks voting in the constitution it was something that is a modern perception after lincoln and the civil rights era.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
And you xan guess who

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Marxism and Globalism two side of the same Hamner. It’s ethnicalky driven.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it goes back a long time to the Time of Rome even. In 1492 Spain expelled the jews and in 1493 the Spanish golden age started.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing “The Enemy of Europe” by Francis Yakey later tonigbt in their livestream

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Danny Tomo hates Mark.

withey
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
certainly

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
I predict that Farage will end up being disgraced for all of his cucking.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Well you can say that about a lot if you go like this is what we used to be but now we’re in the 21st century this is what it means now yo.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
yes so the mischief of jews spans back to 2000 years.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
dirty tricks already underway:
https://xcancel.com/InevitableWes

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I hope that Lowe won’t be outed from politics for antisemitism like Jeremy Corbyn was.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I think a lot of ordinary folk will get confused between Reform and Restore and which is Farage and which is Lowe

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The same looking High Street in all 4 corners of the globe

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@AlexandreL
in order for the Constitution to still have the glory it once did, the nation needs to have the people who respected what it represented while contributing to society. In other words, White primacy.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
The movement needs trailblazers for those who come after have a path to follow.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Most perverts like voting for Queers.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Napoleon also had some anti-Jew legislatures but I forgot which.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@withey
yes. also danny has a lot of confidence in his sprinting attributes

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
The constitution didn’t start being known the way it is until the 1960s or at least Lincoln when he said blacks should have the right to vote and all the rights white people do.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, now we are going too deep in history. I wouldn’t say that Jews actually were a ‘thing’ more than 100 years. Somehow Jews got the most of these wars that European fought among themselves in the past 200 years. But gradually, not immediately.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing thus book later tonigbt in their livestream

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
read; The Enemy of Ejrope by Francis Yokey

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
very true i’m not a member but i support it

withey
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
good because it furthers the divide

Kevin
5 hours ago
Members don’t = votes. Our message is popular and we know it

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
i agred

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
Christianity has a role in breaking down whites’ loss of racial preference. Sorry Christians, but your universal ideology has corrupted our people.

2
1
Hide replies

@Glen19
2 hours ago
Universal religions like Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity has pushed Paganism to extinction around most of the planet. Identity isn’t solely based on religion otherwise it wouldn’t exist. Blaming Christianity for the Woes of is just deflection.

1
0
Prison Ships
2 minutes ago
TheHolyChristianBible rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more so than anything else, does and there is Nothing anyone can do about it. It Stands Written.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
not all wars were started by jews indeed. But most wars were financed by jews going back to Napoleon since the Rothschild family captured most of Europe’s banks.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
the middle class would rather lord it over ethnics. i suspect theyll revret it

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
danny tommo is promising to give anyone a hiding that abuses his monkey mates on twitter lol

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
I think relation to the Jewishness is pretty fluid. Especially if your ancestor was native European, but who converted to judaism in meantime.

withey
6 hours ago
sargon will go full force, tommy is a civ nat

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
all other groups have ethnic self consciousness.

jm
6 hours ago
reimigration, and than, all those mixed race families, more and more every year, time is running out

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not sure that swastika ban is common anywhere. In countries like Germany yes, or like mine, but not every country is like that. Some have bigger freedom of speech. Austria had 20 years openly nazi chancellor.

withey
6 hours ago

@konstrukt
agreed and it ties in with the social contagion

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Suicidal BabyKilling women.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh… Need I not remind that we fought over it 80 years ago? We, as Europeans, not Jews. Those sentiments still prevailed ’til this day. Especially when you had people allying with the Nazis to kill their neighbors.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
And cultural standard-isation is the cause

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
The Constitution needs to go.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Suicidal (((Marxism)))

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@KevinClan
well yes, that was intentional by the Founding Fathers to prevent a tyranny. However, our country is now invaded every year and our federal government doesn’t have the power to properly address the issue.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
cultural alienation is the disease

Kevin
6 hours ago
truth is, British government has way more power than the US federal government. They can cut all benefits, while the US government cant

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Yes it proves he was two generations ago related to a jew not that he was one.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
He didn’t know he had Jewish ancestry I just said that.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, Lenin was 1/6 or 1/8 Jewish.

jm
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
well, yes boomers have a lot to go for them, we grew up in very much harder society

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago(edited)

@noreplacement

@jm
as much disdain as I have for the many silent gens and boomers who allowed all of this mania to take place, I agree that whites have to work together. However, there is no better way for people to disassociate from their programming than some form of trauma like a Black Swan event.

withey
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
agreed

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
A certain amount of Cuck makes a Traitor.

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
agreed

Kevin
6 hours ago
Rupert already has addressed this with his “fast track spouse” visa promise. He is reaching out to the Thai bride people, but saying it will be banned from Pakistan, Afghanistan and other problem countries.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It also speaks against white people how so many of them side with jews and the left in Britain and France today. The jews wouldnt be able to do this without whites stupidity. Means white people are just as bad.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
The older generation is more important than ever because only they know what was normal 20 years ago.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
No, it’s Nazbol. Not exactly the nazi type of fascism.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
here’s the key difference, the demographic reality when the bnp was popular was not as dire as it is now. so, cucking like Farage does when your people are on the brink of becoming a despised minority is no longer a winning strategy.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the intelligence of the joke is what defines it

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
you will get jailed in every single European country if you publicly display a swastika. National Socialism is not a threat to Europeans it’s only a threat to world jewry and the jewish banking mafia.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
I’m a boomer too and see a lot of younger folk, sadly waiting for boomers to die off is not going to fix things. All generations have to work together

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@withey
you can be funny without telling dark or political jokes. It only degrades your rhetoric and makes you look crass and unprofessional

withey
6 hours ago
make it trend to make it acceptable

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
And to add, so far I haven’t seen much of Jew protection from the Soviets. Even in post-Stalin times. Now, all Jews who don’t want to end murdered or imprisoned and who are rich, have to cuck to Putin.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
probably to make sure everyone was serious, we however need humour to soften the blow

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It’s said Lenin never actually knew he had 1 8th jewish ancestry.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
To be frank, the only reason why today Nazi symbols and values are strongly condemned in Russia is because they won in ww2, with individually probably the biggest death rate. So, I believe that antisemitism thing is just thrown in the basket along with anti-Nazism.

jm
6 hours ago

@withey
I am a boomer, and I can tell you, they exaspared me, they have to go before younger people can get a grip on that holocaust question and throw it off and be for our own people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Yes that is true but it means lenins grandfather was half jewish I heard he was 8th jewish. Not Lenin and I heard Lenin hadn’t even known about it.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Hitler didn’t like dark or political jokes. I think that’s an important lesson to learn as a public figure

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
They own tbe media. Thetefore they control the public’s minds

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
The revelation was intended to combat rising anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, though the information was suppressed.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago
Communist language has become the spirit of the times, which is why everyone who thinks differently is now considered a Nazi.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Yeh. Electoral politics aint the way

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
it’s not difficult we just need to make it trend to make it acceptable

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, but they have to revisted their history -they have to throw off the holocaust lies, behore they can proceed

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Sorry my mistake. It’s not a rumor. Documents released by a Moscow museum in 2011 confirmed that Vladimir Lenin had Jewish ancestry, supporting a long-standing, formerly suppressed rumor
. Lenin’s maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to escape persecut

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, not really. He indeed had apparently Jewish ancestry, but I wouldn’t say it was half. Great-grandfather was, from I forgot which side. Which funny enough, he didn’t even know about during his lifetime.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
facism was and has been the answer to communism for a long time. That is the Third Position and is inevitable.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The NAZI question isn’t even really about Jews, its that the general public still views
it as extreme and evil and don’t want to be associated with it. It isn’t a hill to die on, and you can definately expect Lowe to say he is not a nazi and doesn’t support nazis

withey
6 hours ago
that was then this is now, people are sick of immigrants

jm
6 hours ago
the nazi question is very much difficult… it clips our wings, and I am you can say a nazi what my opinions are -the third way

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
MSM and MPs call everyone “Nazis”. Even Boris and the Tories were called “Nazis”.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Its like America today is heavily jewish influenced but it still is on the white americans to fight for this and be complicit in it for so long.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Germany is entirely occupied, there is no need to rehash WW2 right now. There’s no political way to win regarding Hitler

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
hopefully lowe sees what farage did and do the opposite

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Local Councils in England have got all those foreign born illwgal Uber drivers on Lease contracts with nothing to pay up front

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Libertanism existed long before communism is created. It dates back to Reformation period, or even before maybe. Third Position to me sounds like a Nazbol, to be honest.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
who said Nazi? Gott mit uns

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
jews fight for power as well like everyone else. In the end the biggest achievement of the Soviet Union was defeating the most antisemitic government in the 20th century. And thus it seemed the only purpose of the Soviets was to protect jews in Europe.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The whole nazi thing has to be avoided – denounce it in public. We need to save the damn country, not fight WW2

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
everyone is affected by immigration most aren’t affected by rape gangs

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
so the moral of the lesson is to cuck?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the fun stuff

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the only word for lowe to have is ‘remigration’

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
yes it should be something about immigration… now on the interview with Maitlis it was around the grooming gangs -there is another point that can reassamble a lot of people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
That was bullshit and has been refuted.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I would say that indeed yes, Stalin purged many Jews from power, but it didn’t start with him. Don’t forget about mensheviks and their conflict with bolsheviks and bolsheviks killed them all. And both were all Jews.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Tony Lacomba?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
don’t know how people feel about it

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I think the “send them back” is pretty good but I don’

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Lenin is rumored to be half jewish himself. It is ironic that a jewish woman tried to assassinate him.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Mostly blacks drank Jim’s Kool Aid.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because they would be persecuted if they don’t so.

jm
6 hours ago
May be Lowe should point to one programme point, one slogan where people can get behind

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
is libertarianism*

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Initially, bolshevik party was overwhelmingly Jewish. Lenin got USSR out of ww1. Then, I guess non-Jews got used to it. Lenin was dictator and so was Stalin but the irony is that this figures have the most positive impression on the Russian people.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
so the answer to communism and libertarianism? Jews created both sides of the spectrum and people feel they need to pick a side when there’s a “Third Position” o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
In the beginning jews loved the communist government because it served them. When Stalin started to purge all the jews from power than they hated it and hate it till this day.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
And the army also had to have millions of Russians willing to fight for communism and they did to do the revolution in the first place.

@Goblinz_and_Ghouls
6 hours ago
Ayn Rand loved amphetamine and cigarettes more than life itself. She once said the glow of a cigarette is like the fire in a mans heart.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@BritishGammon
yep, play the (vague) game

@SaulGoodman
6 hours ago
Rupert Lowe is part of the problem. he is a tory banker that wants legal migrants to replace white Brits who are forced to pick litter for subsistence wages.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Farage is cucking to the Somalians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not so sure about that. Take Ayn Rand for e.x. One of the reasons why we speak badly today about communism and bolsheviks are because of her and her early life experience. Plenty of Jews croaked in these pogroms. I wouldn’t say they benefit from it, if they were not part of govt

Kevin
6 hours ago
I wouldn’t sit with Laws or Zoomer either lol

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Lowe just has to say “the party is a broad church”. That’s what all other parties say

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Well I’m trying to say the assemblies in power were full of Russian politicians who weren’t jewish who allowed them to stay in powerful positions too!

withey
6 hours ago

@horatiohornblower
sargon passes as white, so of course he stays

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
this

jm
6 hours ago
Bravo Marc

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Today, Marxism dominates the entire West. That was the result.

WhiteLightWhiteHeat
6 hours ago
“Independently wealthy” is KEY!

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
They were powerless to do anything. But maybe they bought into its ideology. Just like French revolutionaires did in 1789.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
antisemitism was punishable by death in the early Soviet era. Maybe they killed som troublesome jews who refused to go along the program, but the majority of jews hugely benefited the bolshevik revolution.

@horatiohornblower
6 hours ago
Sargon is black, will he be deported?

withey
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
no, instead be overenthusiastic, inspire hope and good feeling

Kevin
6 hours ago
Brexit party founder has now come out for Lowe also

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
agreed

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
Rupert will have to be single minded and strong

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Churchill called the October revolution Jewish. He even led an attempt to overthrow the bolshevik government, but… Who knows where would we be today if he succeeded.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
The Tsar and family were murdered during the shortest nights of the year.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Every party has factions-they know they have to work together

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Still at the end of the day, Russia chose communism. The jews couldnt have run it without russians allowing them to.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
I respect your persistence but I would suggest not engaging that troll. He’s actively trying to sow discord in this stream

withey
6 hours ago
idling makes for social problems, work makes for cooperation

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Idk, it is possible they didn’t. There weren’t as much as Jews as white Christians anyway. I think a lot more Jews actually emigrated to the West, after bolsheviks seized power, but also so during the tsarist times. Which makes me think, what values exactly bolsheviks brought for Jew

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
measured enthusiasm

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
Sargons like pacman gobblin up coins in the wake of people with balls

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Read Churchill’s newspaper article from February 8, 1920, in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, in which he described the decisive role of the Jews

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
not at all

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Many of the other soviet assembly members were Russians who weren’t jewish. Also Stalin the infamous one responsible for all the stuff he was wasn’t Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
time to normalise toxicity

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Sargon is a fraud

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
On the night of 16/17 July 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police (Cheka) led by Yurovsky executed Russia’s last emperor, Nicholas II, along with his family. – The Yurovsky family was Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
have hope, get motivation, push them, force the hand

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
We still need activism and collectivism to achieve true power

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Agreed Mark! We can’t overdose on the white pills. Plenty of work to do

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Well it’s still simplified as jewish when it was a european country russia choosing on a national scale communism and they still choose it it’s still pretty popular today in Russia.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
infatuation stage

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@withey
howdy!

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@MilosM.

@utopia148800

@BritishGammon

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
If Lowe is successful the overton window is much easier to shift in other countries, and hopefully the US. I think it’s reasonable to plan in case it doesn’t work out. 1488

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
we dont have any other avenue than Lowe even if theres a slowmotion boot to the face coming

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
but they didn’t kill 20 million jews because they did kill 20 million white Christians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening and evening to

@withey

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@0KT0BER

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i love farmers

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
o/

@withey

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Evening

withey
6 hours ago
good evening all 14/88 wpwp 28

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Bolshevik Jews killed other Jews.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
^

jm
6 hours ago
Make the stream about what Marc is talking about… not about jews in the politburo

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe is a pretty big white pill I will admit

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the lifting of self-censorship is the beginning of enlightenment for the masses

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
he’s a kayak clearly

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, I think he has not read anything

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s been doing this for sometime, have a look on his odysee page

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I can’t tell if

@AlexandreL
is a troll or legitimately believes these things. A waste trying to convince someone like this however

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Including stalin and lenin and every leader they had.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
There were plenty of soviet officials who weren’t jewish.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Also which one of the soviet leaders you can name was a jew? None of them. As well as many of the soviet parliaments or assemblies or whatever you call them.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
what on earth are you talking about? the 60,000,000 people slain by the Communist regime were Christian Europeans, White Russians, Muslims, etc. sure, some of the whites joined with the Communists but obviously some members of a group will always be traitors/scum and sell out.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Trotsky wasn’t even having a good time in the bolsheviks I heard he got in prison for something.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because the Europeans were superior. What do you think the backward Muslims or Africans would have done if they had possessed technological superiority?

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
If I remember correctly, three of the seven members of the first Politburo were Jewish, 43%, in a population share of 5%. The Cheka was predominantly Jewish.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
who were the kulaks

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
probably true. But we need some positives and what else do we have right now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The soviets killed a lot of people but nowhere near 60 million. It may have been Jewish influenced but they were far from the only ones in powerful positions who wanted it.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
Are we all forgetting that we’re not voting our way out of this? Golden Dawn was the third most popular party in the Greek parliament and held as many as 21 seats. Due to jewish supremacist lobbying the party was declared a criminal organization and its leaders were sentenced to 13.5 years in prison.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
What’s a kayak? Oh… I see it now.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Putin said ~86% of leaders NKVD secret police were SatanicJeews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The rumors of stalin being a jew were false! Also the soviet union didnt kill 60 million people that is a hugely exagerated numbre and also the ones killing them were Russians just like the victims were.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago
he is

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
well said

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
ANd had millions of slavic europeans willing to fight for their cause and also only a percentage of the actual soviet powerful were jews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And hundreds of millions of european russians and eastern europeans from other regions.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the Bolsheviks were Jews not Europeans. the rise in Communism by Stalin and Trotsky (real last name. Bronstein) is entirely relevant to the JQ and mass immigration today

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
When it’s Russia there’s no issue saying how horrible Europeans are.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Only Idiots think the World War’s results aren’t the reason Satan is Amplified.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
But why it has nothing to do with us there’s not reason we should feel guilty if it happened. The Soviet Union was Russians and people are fully willing to talk about Europeans committing the worst genocides in history supposedly.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
he seems like a genuine bloke

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, politics is a game and we do not make the rules-yet.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Godspeed Sir!

the woodlander
6 hours ago
jumping to rumble

jm
6 hours ago
Lowe has the ring of honesty about him

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the people who still believe the 6m narrative are cattle. They will eventually either mix into obscurity or become a powerless majority

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Until September 1, 1939, Hitler had murdered a few hundred people, while Stalin had already killed millions. And of course, Stalin didn’t receive a declaration of war although he seized the greater part of Poland.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Depends on what they accuse you of

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i don’t put much stock in mens words anymore

Better Based Than Erased
6 hours ago
Scaredy cats aren’t they – not speaking about kosher

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
And Germany 80 years ago has nothing to do with us.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
I hope they will ban imports as well

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Thow the NeoBolshevik Oppressors out of the ‘overtonwindow’.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
Openly supporting the mustache man gives the media ammo as well. So you have to make due with something.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
so it’s 1950 again? eventually that still led to where we are now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
So the solution is to become supporters of the thing they accuse you of? Also me okay because I am one of you as hard as it is to believe.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
seems he’s ok with nons as long as they are productive and not a public drain

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe needs to give the right answer to the Holohoax…

jm
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
that is just to suppose the worst…

@who
6 hours ago

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
who is a charlie chaplin impersonator?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I just fear the Lowe’s reponse to the JQ and nons that are born within the UK – equivalent to “birthright citizenship” here in the States.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
If we do not expose the 6m myth we will always held back. As soon as we get going, they bring up the holo

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MarkCollett
What I would like to ask is what are your plans if Lowe gets in to power but totally betrays the cause like all the other nationalist parties that were elected to lead?

jm
6 hours ago
it is true, in 2014 I still supported Israel ! can you imagine ? Now I follow Marc, RedIce, Blackpilled, Warstrike and many more.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Which is kind of the definition of a Nazi supporter isn’t it?

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
People in this chat were just telling me they don’t want to be called nazis by the media but then tell me about how the Nazis were nice and six million cookies weren’t baked.

the woodlander
6 hours ago
all of those tweets come from his team, not rupert himself. i just hope he understands.

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@WarStrike

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I’m not a non.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
A whole bunch but I usually don’t watch live. Nick Fuentes, Jake Shields Redice Blood Tribe and a bunch of smaller shows.

jm
6 hours ago
I saw the interview with Maitlis -he was good

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
yep proceed with caution is best

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I’ve heard of that, I’ll check it out. thanks

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Common Sense Revival Ahead..

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The Soviet Union was a European state too buddy. I’m not a J I shouldn’t get this much people telling me to bore off for not supporting a charlie chaplin impersonator.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
extraordinary

Kevin
6 hours ago
80k now Mark

Chief Moody
6 hours ago
I thought it was 80K

Kevin
6 hours ago
it’s 80 thousand now

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
What role do the dead Jews play in the context of 60 million deaths and the downfall of Europe, simply because the British and French declared war over German territories? Tell me.

JamesL
6 hours ago
bore off

@AlexandreL

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
you can’t be mad at Cookie Monster for being skeptical :flatbread:

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897 that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Warstrike is interesting

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
We can never trust politicians. I trust Mark.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
which streams do you mean? I don’t watch many people aside from Collett and Devon Stack.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
You’re lucky streams in America start at 2am for us here

Kevin
6 hours ago
your buddy Mike from TRS was just shitting all over Lowe saying nobody should do anything because it is all over. like to hell with that guy

Prison Ships
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
You can’t do anything about it, so stop moaning..Your opinion is over amplified for 88 years.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
71 watching, 18 likes. Hit that fire button!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
though it’s afternoon for me lol

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Hello Sir!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
*gentlemen

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Evening Gentleman.

Secure the future of our people
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Just finished watching your Jake Shields interview. It was pretty awesome! :ok_hand:

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
spot on.

the woodlander
7 hours ago

@0KT0BER
buddy

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
evening Woody

Prison Ships
7 hours ago
Favouring SatanicJeews over Christian Germany was offensively Foul.

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
if you are white, you have some serious learning to do. But I suspect you’re a non

the woodlander
7 hours ago
gentlemen

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark why do you not think any mention of the Nazis tarnishes your entire movement in the eyes of normies?

JamesL
7 hours ago

Mark Collett
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
you are making all my points!

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
sadly this is not helped by some in the movement- I will argue against the BOOMER MYTH of Churchill saving Britain BUT trying to recreate nazi germany is as daft as trying to bring back the witchfinder general-

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
PART of what has held nationalism back IS this association by media of ANY Nationalist movement with muh evil nazis-WHY do you think it was the 1st question asked to Nick on QT. WHY do you think the media kept putting out those cartoonish photos of John Tyndall playing nazi dress up?

@AlexandreL
8 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
Who says that everyone here believes stuff about 1939? You’re kind of speaking for everyone it has no relevance to the modern day and issues in our lives.

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
Its the best out there- yes he’s a civ nat Boomer, Yes he probably wouldn’t agree with us that Britain should have stayed neutral in 1939-BUT he is putting forward BNP type policies & ALREADY has 50.000 members whereas the BNP Peak was 14000 & the NF peak was 16000.This surely is a white pill…

@AlexandreL
12 hours ago

@MarkCollett
:kissing_closed_eyes:

Mark Collett
15 hours ago

@AlexandreL
The Room!

@AlexandreL
17 hours ago
Hello Mark, I did not hit her, oh hi Mark.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897

@AlexandreL
that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
I’m just saying you can’t say its not true when Mark lets people donate him 14 dollars and 88 cents every stream. He’s asking to be associated with certain people.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
1939, Mustache man declares war on Poland.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
fcck off you little worm

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
https://odysee.com/@0KT0BER:9/opencourt-doc-1897:f

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
Friday, March 24, 1933 – Judea Declares War On Germany

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
When most channels would ban them instantly I’m not saying you should I’m just saying what it looks like.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
channel.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
You shouldn’t be saying anything like Churchill was the real villain or Auschwitz wasnt killing people or any stupid shit like that that guy is associating himself with the nazis by humanizing them in any way. I suspect you are more or less a nazi supporter thats why you let these people on your

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Aaron Spreadbury: Steve Laws is well known across the Right-wing sphere. He has a laudable track record, with many years behind him, of publicly confronting the mass migration issue. He is extremely outspoken and is particularly active on Twitter where he has somehow managed to not get banned. But his best work, I think, is his Dover documentary videos where he filmed illegal migrants arriving. It was a simple thing to do, but it gained the public crucial awareness that has layered with other efforts since to build the growing awareness of the problem that threatens us.

 

Being in the public eye, however, has not been without its cost. He has been subjected to all manner of attacks, from slander and defamation to being outright arrested and prosecuted, often for things that would not be considered criminal at all if someone else was to do it. None of these ever stick, of course, but it’s the process itself that is the punishment. They have dragged him through the system over and over, and it has only served to galvanise him.

 

Steve has done excellent work in highlighting the gross hypocrisy of the system. His activities have invigorated nationalist sentiment and his aggressive journalistic methods have earned him the moniker of “ The Migrant Hunter ”. He has also acquired the usual tags of racist, anti-semite and White supremacist, but they don’t sound quite so cool!

 

So please welcome to the stage, Steve Laws!

 

[loud applause]

 

Steve Laws: All right, so I’m assuming most of you guys never thought you’d see me back here, but I am very grateful to be back here. Thanks, Mark, for inviting me back. Looking in front of me right now, this is the clearly the largest nationalist organisation in the country. It’s not even close.

 

[applause]

 

So thank you for having me to speak. Mark’s asked me to speak on re-migration. I’m assuming most of you guessed that anyway, The Migrant Hunter! Thank you for that. [laughing] I suppose it’s quite a classy nickname. At the time I wasn’t so keen, but now I’m probably leaning into it a little bit.

 

But let me get started. So, like the Africans, … Yes, I know another Martin Luther King quote. Like the Africans, I have a dream! But my dream’s a little bit better. My dream is to see millions and millions of immigrants removed from our country!

 

[loud cheering and applause]

 

Some people may get a little bit uncomfortable when you use this language, but the reality is, without millions of people being removed from this country, we are not going to have a future for our people. Our children are going to grow up as hated minorities. And that to me is unacceptable. I do not care if these people came over illegally. I do not care if they came over legally. I do not care if they were born here. I do not care if their grandparents were born here! These people have to leave! This is not their land. This is ours. And we will not tolerate it!

 

[loud applause]

 

So re-migration, what is it? To simplify, remigration is the act and or process of returning immigrants to their country of origin.

 

Now, there are a number of people and organisations that will tell you re-migration is only deporting the illegal immigrants and the foreign criminals and voluntary repatriation. That is a lie! That is not what re-migration is! Remigration is reversing our demographic decline by any means necessary. There is no person in this country that does not belong here that has the right to demographically replace us. We will not tolerate that under any circumstances!

 

So why is it important? Why is re-migration important? I think it’s clear to see that without re-migration we are seriously in an awful lot of trouble. The problems are clear as day. Children getting raped, people getting murdered. These aren’t just rare occurrences. These are everyday situations. And these are happening by immigrants. They’re not just happening by illegal immigrants. These are legal immigrants imported by our government. Many of these have been born here. And they’re allowed to roam our streets, rape, murder and steal off our people. And we are not going to tolerate it anymore. We want every single one of these people removed from our country. It’s not going to happen voluntary. And unfortunately, this isn’t going to be a peaceful process for a lot of people. There is going to be an awful lot of hardship for our own people and for the immigrants involved through re-migration. But the alternative is far worse!

 

I do not want my children growing up as a hated minority in their own country. I do not want my children to have to look over their shoulder when they sit on a bus. I do not want my children to have to live in fear. That to me is unacceptable. I will spend the rest of my life campaigning to make sure these people are removed so our people have a future. I do not care about the smears. I do not care about the labels thrown at me. Call me racist, call me a Nazi, call me an anti-semite. I couldn’t care less! I really couldn’t! Because at the end of the day, our people come first! That is our priority. Our people are our family and we will not tolerate it.

 

So there are a number of organisations that campaign and call for re-migration. I used to be a member of one of them called the Homeland Party. Boo! Yes, I know! So these parties, they will tell you that re-migration is only voluntary. It’s not! Okay. And these people, they’re trying to pretend not to be radicals, they’re trying to hide who they are. Do not hide who you are. Be proud of who you are! I stand in front of my face, out my name, out. I do not care. I want these people gone from my country. I’m planting my flag in the sand. I’m not moving. And we will move the public to our position.

 

For time and time again, for decades now, nationalists have always used the argument of:

 

“ We’ve got to move to the middle ground! We’ve got to welcome the normal people, let’s open our arms to them, let’s water the message down a little bit, we’ll gain more support! ”

 

It’s a lie, it’s a pipe dream! It doesn’t happen!

 

[06:31]

 

The only way to get the people to accept what we want is to be unapologetic in opposition and drag them there! Without doing that, we will never get them there. And it’s as simple as that.

 

Some people are uncomfortable with my language, and I can understand, I do use tougher language than most people. But our people have been under a spell. They’ve been hypnotized for decades! And they need to be radicalised and they need to be radicalised fast. And the only way to do that is through vigorous propaganda. And unfortunately, that’s where we’re at at the moment. Our people need waking up. And it sounds cliche:

 

“ Oh, we need to wake our people up! ”

 

But it’s not just a case of waking them up and they’re red pilled now and they understand all of these questions. No! Our people need to be woken up to the point where they are active on the street, they are campaigning, they are vigorously calling for what they demand and they’re not afraid to do. So because at the moment, our people are afraid to speak up. They’re afraid they’re going to lose their job. I’ve been through it myself. I’ve lost jobs, I’ve had my house raided multiple times, I’ve been arrested, I’ve been put through false charges, all for speaking about immigration. Most of those were when I was only talking about illegal immigration, which is mostly a civic nationalist position at the best! It’s not even extreme to say that illegal criminals shouldn’t be in our country. That’s a basic common sense position.

 

So nationalists need to plant their flag in the sand. They need to be unapologetic and they need to stand there and say:

 

“ Enough is enough. This is where we’re at. This is what we want. And we do not apologise for who we’re proud to be nationalists, we love our country, and we do not care what these traitors and these foreign subversives have to say about that this is England. This is Britain. This is our land, not theirs! ”

 

[loud applause]

 

And then there’ll be other. There’ll be other movements such as UKIP, and the Tommy Robinson crowds. And these people will tell you that:

 

“ It’s fine if they integrate. It’s okay. They go down the pub, they drink a beer! ”

 

But integration is a lie! These people do not integrate. It’s a myth! Whether you’ve got Sikhs and Hindus or you’ve got Muslims or jews, they all live in their own little communities. They all keep amongst their own. They shop at their own stores, they send their children to their own schools, they speak their own languages, they stick amongst their own, which I do not blame them. So I would only want to be around English people.

 

But the point is, this is our land! And they’re now being given away pockets of our country to foreigners who have no right to it. Not only that, these people hate us and despise us for what our ancestors done in bettering the world. And a simple fact is that they do not belong here. And you can beat around the bush and you can say:

 

“ We’ve got a nice immigrant. This geezer is nice. This one’s fine. He’s against the illegals. ”

 

It means nothing! At the end of the day, they all have to go. We need to reverse the demographic decline. When I was born in 1991, the demographics were 95% White British, roughly. So in my lifetime, I’ve watched the demographics decline down to around 74% at the last census. But if we’re all being obvious, I’d say we’re around 70, 69% of the population now. So in my lifetime, I’ve witnessed severe decline. I am literally a product of what they’ve created.

 

So what can we do to campaign for re-migration?

 

Now, there’s the argument we could start a party. We could start a new party. We’re campaigning on re-migration. I’m telling you right now, it’s a waste of time. I’ve been there, I’ve done it, and it doesn’t work! Not only that, once you become a party, you cannot become radical. You cannot push the envelope. You cannot move people to our positions. The only reason we have, people like Rupert Lowe echoing our talking points is because we’ve been unapologetic in our position. We’ve created a pathway for these people to move in. This is why we need our radicals. We need people to drag the window as far as possible so the politicians can move into another, safer position and say:

 

“ Okay, it’s safe to call a deportation of the Boris Wave. Now we can call for deportation of legal immigrants because now that pathway has been made accessible by nationalists. ”

 

But it will never be made accessible if everyone is too busy saying:

 

“ No, we need to meet with the middle grounds. We’ve got to water down our message. Let’s not scare away the normies. ”

 

No, let’s scare them! Because what our future is going to be like is terrifying! I do not want my children raped. I do not want my children killed. I do not want my friends and family to live in a country where they have to look over their shoulder and live in fear. And that’s the direction we are going.

 

[11:10]

 

I’m quite lucky where I live in the country. I live in the southeast. The demographics are okay. I live near the seaside. There’s not too many immigrants about. But some of you guys live in these big cities and you cannot even get on public transport without fearing for your life. If you walk around as an open nationalist in a very multicultural, multiracial area, your life is very much at risk.

 

Many of us here have had incidents where immigrants have either tried to attack us or with the support of the state and groups like Antifa and Hope Not Hate and Searchlight and so forth. Our addresses have been doxed, our locations have been given away, our lives have been put in danger. This all happens because we’re calling for re-migration and mass deportations. And why are we calling for this? Because we want to protect our people. That’s the only goal in this.

 

We’re not going around saying:

 

“ We want to deport these people because we don’t like them! ”

 

It’s irrelevant whether we like them or not. It’s not personal. It’s necessary.

 

So what we need to do is build for 2030. Reform has the next election won. It would be suicidal and stupid for any nationalist to stand against them at that time. What we have to do is campaign and pressure these candidates who, many of them are sympathetic to our message. Of course, Reform will never be our guys. I was in the party. I was kicked out for calling Sunak an Indian. This is how ridiculous the party is! [chuckling] But if we get a Reform government and they do deport the illegal immigrants and they remove some foreign criminals, it gives us an extra year or two. It’s not great, it’s not perfect, and it’s not a huge strategy.

 

But dragging these politicians to our position is important. Because as soon as these politicians move to our position, the public follows them. The public doesn’t follow us because we’re scary to them. They look around at us and they go. They’ve got no real world influence. Despite everyone echoing our talking points. They’ve got no money behind them, they’ve got no infrastructure. Which is true. Sorry, which is true. We haven’t got any infrastructure. We haven’t got vehicles to just call them. We haven’t got a huge amount of manpower.

 

So that’s where our time needs to be. That’s where our energy needs to be. In this hall now we have over 200 people. By next year it should be 500 people. This is the approach we should be. Nationalists need to come out and stand together. So by 2030, when Reform get into government, we can hold their feet to the fire. We have to use a similar logic and approach that Momentum used within Labour. That’s an approach we have to take.

 

Now, re-migration has been done before, although in very small terms. Even today it’s happening in Pakistan, they’re deporting Afghans. In America, they’re running around rounding up illegals. Although the numbers are very vague, it’s still happening, which shows you there is an appetite for this, even under populist leaders.

 

But make no mistake, we have a very long way to go. Only under this Labour government, from July 24 to July 25, only a mere 35,000 people have been deported. That’s 25, 937 voluntary and 9, 115 forced. That’s pathetic! That’s ridiculous! We’ve had more than that come over just illegally through the dinghies, let alone the millions that are flooding in through the borders.

 

But the fact that Labour governments are deporting people, the fact that Labour governments are entering and using our rhetoric, sure, they don’t believe in it. They never will! They’re not even going to implement it. But the people listening to them believe it. The normal people sitting at home watching the news, when they hear the Prime Minister say:

 

“ We’re living in an island of strangers. ”

 

And then they walk through town and all they can see is browns and blacks and all sorts of foreigners. And it’s clear as day what is happening. It’s clear as day that we are an island of strangers. When I was younger, there was a sense of community. Where I grew up, I grew up in a council estate in Folkestone. Everyone was White British. We had a couple of Irish or so forth. But overall it was a very homogenous society. I could go into any person’s house on my street and we could all go in, we could have a cup of tea, you could make a drink. No one would care. Everyone would look out for each other.

 

But now, in the same estate, it’s full up with foreigners. No one even talks to their neighbours. The kids are not playing outside the front. It’s a completely different community. And that’s changed in the space of 30 years. What’s going to happen in another 30 years? Where is England and Britain going to be? And Scotland and Wales? Where are they going to be in a hundred years? Are we even going to exist as a people or are we going to play the minority game? Are we going to play the minority game in our country and be hated minorities and beg for crumbs off the table? Or are we going to say:

 

“ No, we want the whole lot! We are not begging for crumbs. This is our country! We’re taking the lot! ”

 

So essentially, the borders are still open, millions are flooding in, and the solution is re-migration. Remigration is what we want. Remigration is what everyone needs. You can call it mass deportations, you can call it expulsion, you can call it what you want, I do not care.

 

[16:07]

 

But ultimately, this is what we need. And there are ways to force politicians to adopt your talking points. So it sounds a bit silly, but the communist approach is relentless propaganda of pushing a message and throwing it down people’s throats consistently. That’s what I’ve done for the last year and a half of re-migration. Not to sort of toot my own horn a little bit, but the term “ re-migration ” was not even a word in the UK really, in terms of the political scene a year and a half ago, until we adopted the stance and dragged it through the window and forced it into the most popular position in the country now.

 

It’s a similar approach I took when I used to film the illegals down at Dover. So I’d stand there every day, consistently:

 

“ Just film the boats. Another boat’s coming today. Show the numbers. Another boat’s coming today. Show the numbers! ”

 

Consistently. Every day, repeating the same talking points until people are sick of it and they don’t want to hear it! And then carry on some more because they need to hear the solution. Everyone talks about the problems, everyone knows what’s at stake! Everyone knows what direction we go in. Let’s talk about the solutions. Let’s offer real world solutions to the people.

 

Yes, re-migration is not going to happen without our guys in power. But here’s a tough pill that Nationalists are going to have to take. We’re not going to be the guys that implement re-migration. We’re going to be the ones that influence those that do. And this is where we have to understand our position in this movement. We are not all going to get elected and we’re going to take a government and we’re going to be the majority in the House of Commons. I would love it! Every single one of us would.

 

But we have to live in the real world. The real world is. A lot of these politicians are sympathetic. I won’t name names, but a lot of MPs reach out to me privately, members of the House of Lords, famous commentators and news politicians and whatever you want to call them. All of these people reach out to me and ask for information about mass deportations and re-migration. They send me their posts and ask:

 

“ Is that okay to say? ”

 

Like, a lot of these people are entering a area of politics that they’re not used to, they’re not comfortable with. We’ve entered a new land. Before nationalists have always been apologizing and saying:

 

“ I’m sorry, I’m a Nationalist, I’m sorry, I want my country back. ”

 

No more! This is what we need to do. We need to be tough, unapologetic and radical! No more sensible nationalism, no more Kenny Smith nonsense! [chuckling] We need real Nationalists, we need real world change and we need thousands of Nationalists! It’s no good celebrating that. Yes, I’ve just launched re-migration now. We’ve got around 550 members, but that’s nothing to celebrate. Sure, it’s great! I’ve got five hundred and fifty guys that want to come out and campaign, but I need 50,000 guys! I don’t need 500 guys. And this is where we need to be. We need to be building. We need to be building infrastructure, gaining funds, buying property, buying vehicles.

 

So when anything happens in the country, we’ve got the manpower to send a coach of Nationalists to one place or we’ve got the manpower to go:

 

“ Okay, a nationalist house is just burned down. We’re going to send 30 guys to go and help them. ”

 

This is how we can make real world change. But at the moment there’s so many different organisations, there’s so many different groups. This is one of the main reasons I’m here today, Mark invited me to speak and I want to show a true show of unity. I’m not a member of PA. I probably won’t join as a member of PA. That doesn’t mean I don’t like you guys, but I have my own vision of campaigning on re-migration. That’s my main priority.

 

All of these other organisations, I won’t name all the other ones, but we all need to come together as a collective. We don’t have to be under the same banner and everyone follows orders from this guy or this guy because that’s a pipe dream and it’s never going to happen. But we can collaborate, we can work together, we can work on projects together, we can make campaigns together. We can share resources, we can share money. If someone’s got a vehicle, but another person’s got a venue, we can work together. Here’s no reason why we can’t. We’re all in this together. It’s our country and we all want the same thing.

 

So when it comes back to re-migration, people always get terrified and they say:

 

“ What about my mixed race cousin? Or what about my friends from the Congo? ”

 

I don’t care, okay? You may be upset, you may be unapologetic about that, but I simply do not care! Your emotional baggage and your skin in the game does not mean the whole country has to collapse because you’ve made a decision. That’s your choice of what you’ve made, and now you’re going to have to deal with it, unfortunately. There are going to be tough decisions that need to be made. I don’t expect everyone to take the radical stance that I take. But you have to be calling for deportations! You have to be calling for the removal of legal immigrants! And you have to be calling for it consistently!

 

Whenever you talk to a politician, a journalist, even a random activist, anyone in the street, talk about re-migration, tell them the solution. Tell them you do not have to live this. You do not have to walk down in your own streets looking over your shoulder, fearing for your life and your family’s life and your safety of the whole country. You shouldn’t have to live this. It’s absolutely ridiculous!

 

So plant your flag in the sand and demand total re-migration. Not a little bit of re-migration, not one or two, not a couple of million, all of them! Every single one!

 

[loud applause]

 

[21:27]

 

Because we are radical. And the things we’re proposing are radical. And this is what you have to understand. Don’t lie to people and say:

 

“ Oh, it’s not so bad. It’s going to be fine. Nothing bad’s going to happen. ”

 

Of course, it’s going to be a bit of a hardship. We’re going to be removing millions of people. There’s going to be some economic turmoil, there’s going to be a lot of changes taking place. But it’s either that or we lose our homelands. And which would you rather? Let’s be clear. Would you rather hurt the feelings of a few people? A couple of good guys may get caught up in the madness, or we lose our homeland. We have nowhere else to return. Because we have nowhere to run to. We have nowhere else that we can go for safety. There’s nobody in the world that is going to save us. Nobody’s going to come and protect us. It’s on us as a people. It’s on us!

 

So we can either willow away, apologise, be all nice and calm, try and get some crumbs off the table, or we can say:

 

“ No, we want the lot! We’re not giving in and we’re taking everything! ”

 

So essentially we need re-migration now. And I’m going to leave you with this because I feel like this man, he’s a great man anyway. But the quote is very fitting and it follows me daily. So it’s all there, it’s all waiting. Of course it can be done. It depends upon ourselves. And that sticks with me every single day. Because it can be done! Nothing is impossible! People will tell you that:

 

“ You can’t remove those people. You can’t deport millions of people! But you can import millions of people, that’s fine, but you can’t remove them. ”

 

So stand your ground, hold your line in your position. Total re-migration! Millions have to go!

 

Thank you.

 

[long loud applause]

 

[23:30]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/12/2025 = 10)

JamesL
3 days ago
” This is the difference between Steve and some of the other speeches we’ve seen recently.
You can tell he doesn’t particularly like public speaking, you can tell it doesn’t come naturally to him, but it’s a great speech because you can tell he means everything he’s saying and it all comes from the heart.
Total patriot and I’ll always have his back until the end. One of the only guys with a platform on here who truly gets it.
We’ve made massive strides together with our fellow patriots over the past year or so and we’ll continue doing so. We’re the drummers of Remigration and we’re going to keep on drumming until everyone gets the message and propagates the message.
Give it a watch. Great job Steve.
TOTAL REMIGRATION.”
~ Zoomer Historian
Less

9
0
FunnyCool&Epic
3 days ago
MILLIONS :clapping_hands:
Europe will be white again!

6
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
good speech , yes millions must go

5
0
Edelweiß
2 days ago(edited)
But do the British have the prerequisite Morality to make millions go? The barrier which prevented Britain from staying British is the same barrier which will prevent Britain from becoming British again. It’s in the minds of the British. It’s Liberal/Christian/Slave Morality. Are you going to Hate your enemies? Are you going to Love your enemies? Are you going to destroy your enemies and take the land? Are you going to sacrifice yourself and share the land? The Israelis are currently demonstrating the Morality it takes. What is your Morality? The solution isn’t going to be clean or political.

1
1
Hide replies
Avalon
1 day ago
There is nothing moral or analogous about Israel bombing a neighbouring country into rubble. Remigration is telling people to go home.

Love & Division
3 days ago
Unless you first remigrate the Jews who are controlling the war-on-withes you will be opposed.

2
0
Dawn Browning
3 days ago
Well said & done, our Steve

2
0

@filled_soda
2 days ago
Great stuff, Steve

1
0
Htrac
2 days ago
Millions must leave. :clapping_hands:
Steve has been instrumental in shifting the public conversation towards remigration, and it’s working.

1
0
Alice1488
1 day ago
Powerful no nonsense speech Steve. Well done

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 276, I’m live tonight. I say I because my guest has not arrived yet. He’s informed me he’s running a couple of minutes late, but he will be here shortly. But at the moment, it is me alone and I am live on Odysee. I’m live on Dlive. I’m live on Rumble and I’m live on Entropy.

 

Now, as always, you know how difficult it is for me to get the word out about these shows. I’m de-platformed on Twitter, on Facebook, on Instagram, on all mainstream social networks.

 

So if you can, please do share this show, because I’m sure when my guest arrives tonight, it’s going to be a fantastic show. It always is when I’m joined by Woodlander. Something to look forward to.

 

Now, I do have some bad news. I’ve been promising a review of Europa: The Last Battle for two months. Last month we had somebody who was ill, and this month somebody’s way on holiday.

 

So that’s going to have to be postponed again, unfortunately, to October. So I’m sorry for people who are looking forward to that, this weekend. However, it will still be happening. I’m certainly not giving up on the idea. I didn’t sit through nearly 13 hours for nothing! And it is an excellent documentary. So it is something we are absolutely going to be doing. And I apologise to people who were looking forward to that.

 

Now, I will be back on Friday, and on Friday I do have a special video. Now I’m doing a video all about the new laws that are coming in. So Yvette Cooper has announced a “Hundred Day Sprint”, whatever that means, to identify extremism and ways to target extremism. And I’ve picked apart her statement and broken down the likely changes in the law and the way those will be implemented in order to take away our freedom of speech. I think we’re moving rapidly in Britain towards a surveillance Police State. And the kind of surveillance Police State where the government basically take away many of our protections and drop the threshold for what will be known as “incitement” for material that’s likely to incite hate, whereas before it was something like “incitement to racial hatred”.

 

But I explained it all in the video, and that’s going to be out at 01:00 pm on Friday, as always. So look forward to that. And please do remember, I always have a video out every week. I’ve done that since 2016. I’ve been very consistent in doing that. And last week’s video Protesters Jailed Paedophiles Walk Free is still available, will always be available, and remember, they’re always free. There’s no paywall.

 

Now if you want to support my work, if you want to support the show, please do consider a small donation. You can donate by Entropy, Odysee. They are the ways to do it live on stream. Obviously I will read out in the second hour of the show any paid donation, whether it’s a statement, or a question, and I will answer that along with my guest. He has just informed me he is entering his house now and setting up his computer, so he will be with us shortly, but we will answer any questions in the second half of the show.

 

Obviously, I realise not everyone can donate live during the show, as not everyone who watches the show watches live. You can also donate if you’re watching it on replay, and if you want to, you can donate via crypto-currencies. All the crypto links are down in the description of the video below, whether you’re watching live or you’re watching on replay. So you can see those on Rumble, Odysee and over on BitChute where the replay will be uploaded immediately after the show.

 

Finally, if you want to write to me, if you want to contact me please do at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. That’s my email address. And my website, www.thefallofwesternman.com is where you can get my book. Now you can buy a hardback, you can buy a regular soft cover, or if you want, you can download it for free as a PDF. So even my book is available for free.

 

So please do consider giving something, whether it is a small donation, something like $3, $5, $10. If everyone chipped in who is watching live, we would be the best funded movement on the planet. So please do consider that.

 

Now, before my guest arrives, I do have some news. Now, as we know, there has been over a thousand people arrested due to the anti-migrant protests that took place after the murders that happened in Southport. Those anti-migrant protests, some of them did end in disorder, and there have been a number of people arrested.

 

Now, the sentences being handed down are absolutely scandalous! You’re seeing sentences being handed out to 18 year old lads of 20 months for kicking a police van. I mean, I’ve never seen anything like it. And if you’ve been watching my social media, I’ve been comparing and contrasting these sentences with the sentences that BLM rioters got.

 

So there’s a greater comparison. A young black lad, he tried to set fire to one of the union flags at our cenotaph in London. He was 19 years old at the time. A judge gave him a suspended sentence.

 

Basically, the slap on the wrist. Told him he’d been a naughty boy, got a bit silly and off he goes home. Keep your head down. Don’t get into trouble again.

 

Young lad kicks a police van at an anti-migrant protest. 20 months in jail!

 

Now, I’m pretty sure that if you asked most people in this country what they think to an 18 year old lad kicking a police CCTV van, they would say, that’s unacceptable. If you ask them, should that young man go to jail, I think the answer would be unanimously, “no!” Sending somebody to jail for something like that is just overkill. It’s unfair. It goes against natural justice. Natural justice suggests that you should never be given a sentence that is disproportionate to the crime being committed.

 

[06:17]

 

So if you kicked a police van maybe you get a fine to pay for the dent, to be buffed out. Maybe you get community service to learn to be a good member of society. But jail for 20 months is ridiculous!

 

Now, equally, if you ask most normal people, what do you think to somebody who went to our cenotaph in London, a memorial to our war dead for multiple generations, and tried to set fire to the country’s flag? I think people would have a much harsher view of that kind of criminality than of somebody who kicked a police van. Yet this guy got let off!

 

Now, because of these injustices and because of the ridiculous sentences, and there has been some really terrible sentences. There’s been one where a mother of five has been jailed, so her kids are going to miss out on their mum for at least a year or more. Absolutely scandalous! I’ve seen cases where Muslim paedophile rapists have been spared jail because the Muslim’s wife didn’t speak English, so he had to be allowed out on the street. He had to be allowed out on the street because his wife couldn’t do the shopping. You know, she couldn’t get around. She needed him as an interpreter. She relied on him. But a mother, a White mother of five, she’s got to go to jail.

 

So you will see on our website, patrioticalternative.org dot UK, and you’ll see on our social media. We are the only group that has stepped up. We’re the only group that are doing something about this. We’re the only group that actually cares. And you can tell if somebody cares because they do something, they don’t just pay lip service to it.

 

We have started a fundraiser. We’ve already raised over 8,000 pounds for people who have been unfairly sentenced, and specifically for the families of those who have been separated from their mother, their father, their primary carer. So if people have children, if there’s an elderly man who’s cared for by his son, and his son is now in jail, we intend to discover who those people are and give them substantial donations.

 

So the more needy will get more, etcetera. That is something we’re doing. We’re also compiling a full list of people that we believe fall into one of three categories. The first, people who said things on social media, you shouldn’t be going to jail for things you said on social media. Simple as that.

 

Number two, people who have been unfairly sent to jail. So, you know, for basically non-crime. So people who kicked a police van. A guy got sentenced to jail for shouting at a police dog, another man for gesturing at the police, and one guy for simply being their world disorder take took place. People in that second category are people who were arrested and jailed for what were effectively non-crimes.

 

And thirdly, there is another category, people who were arrested for things that were undoubtedly crimes, like kicking a police van or throwing a rock. But these people have been jailed for a vastly disproportionate amount of time, that is years for something minor. We are compiling a list of people who fall into those three categories. People who said things on social media, people who committed non-crimes yet were jailed, and people who did commit minor crimes but were given harsh sentences. We’re compiling a list of those people were trying to get their prisoner numbers so that we can write to them, offer support to them, and give them any legal advice they may need.

 

This is a huge campaign. If you can help in any way, please, please check out what were doing both on social media and on our website, which is patrioticalternative.org dot UK.

 

The wandering Woodlander is finally here! How are you doing, my friend?

 

The Woodlander: I’m good. Hello, Mark. Sorry for my lateness. It couldn’t be helped. Traffic and whatnot. Should have left earlier.

 

Mark Collett: So it could have been helped? xx As always. zz As always. Yes, indeed.

 

So how have you been, my friend?

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, good. I’ve had a good day. It’s been a mad week, as I’m sure you’ve discussed. Interesting, though, Mark, really interesting. The things that have happened over this last week and the way that Starmer has introduced legislation and set precedents, which will be interesting to see going forward.

 

The one for me is that it looks like what he’s trying to do is to say that the government are the only people that give you the truth! And if you say anything other than what they’ve said, that is now misinformation or disinformation, and now they’ve criminalised publishing disinformation and misinformation!

 

So if you say anything that goes against what the government has put out, it looks as if that could be criminal. When you can get put in prison for misinformation, and they’re saying that only what they put out is the truth, then surely saying you don’t agree with the government would be misinformation. And that’s dangerous territory. But that does look like what he’s trying to do.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it actually goes further than that, if you don’t mind saying, and I’m getting a bit of feedback off your mic, Woodlander, every time I talk. Yeah, thank you.

 

So it goes further than that. I’ve actually read the documents that have passed this into law. And it actually doesn’t just criminalise misinformation and disinformation, it creates another one of these two tier systems.

 

[12:20]

 

So there are a number of exceptions that have been carved out in the legislation. So if you are sitting in Parliament, if you are working for an approved major broadcast, so that will be like ITV, Channel Four, Sky News, BBC. If you write for what they class as a major newspaper. So again, The Times, the Telegraph, the Mirror, the Sun, the Mail, the Express, or if you are somebody that they class, as you know, a leading member of the establishment, so you’re in the judiciary, you’re a leading police officer, you’re somebody who’s important to the establishment, you are exempt!

 

So this means if you’re a journalist and you say, like some of them have in the past. So I’ll give you an example. When there was the riots in Knowlesley, one journalist wrote this horrific newspaper report saying that it was all my fault, saying that I was the one who’d stirred it up. I had specifically sent people there, I was coordinating this, and they later had to retract that. It was later retracted because it was misinformation.

 

In fact, it was more than misinformation, it was a complete lie! Because there was nothing to base that on. I’d never said that. And on all the streams, you could go back. I’ll always say to people:

 

“Don’t attend protests after night, after dark. If you come to a PA protest, there’s no drinking. We’ve got to be as well behaved as possible. Don’t get involved in violence. If you think there’s going to be violence, probably best not to attend because you’re only going to get yourself arrested.”

 

This has been my mantra consistently since I started doing these shows in 2016.

 

Now, despite all that, this guy lied!

 

But if you were to then say, I’m ringing the police and I’m reporting you for spreading misinformation or disinformation about me, the police would immediately say:

 

“No case to answer. Because he is doing that through a major newspaper that there’s an exception for.”

 

So at this point, you’re not just creating a Ministry of Truth, you’re also creating some kind of level of hierarchy where if you are part of the establishment, you get a pass. And no matter what you do, you cannot be found guilty under these laws because they simply don’t apply to you.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, I think we’ve all seen this coming for a long time. It seems that it’s happened really quickly since Starmer got in. But to be honest, I think he’s playing a playbook. I think this was already scripted out. All they were waiting for was the reaction that they got after those horrendous incidents. It could have been at any time, it just happened that it was a week, or a month into his premiership.

 

But I think this has been on the cards for a while. A huge legal crackdown on dissent and countering what’s put out by the government. And it’s really dangerous ground. We all know this historically, the communist playbook, where this leads to. And it’s getting to the point. I mean, we’re seeing it play out in real time at the moment, which is if you disagree, if you dissent, you’re off to the Gulag! Literally.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I completely agree. And these new laws, well, I’m actually doing a video on it on Friday on these laws, and not specifically these ones about misinformation and disinformation, but about these counter extremism laws, how they’re basically conflating extremism with terrorism and how they are dropping the threshold of what you need to do, which is the most worrying thing.

 

So the old threshold was if you were inciting racial hatred, you had to use language that was “abusive, insulting or threatening”.

 

Now, that’s quite a high barrier because if we’re sitting here tonight and we are saying:

 

“Well we don’t believe migrants should come here because they commit crime at statistically at a higher rate than the native population and they often target young girls. And this can be proven because X, Y and Z.”

 

That’s not threatening, it’s not abusive and it’s definitely not insulting. It’s just a calm statement in effect calling for policy change. But under new laws, they will say:

 

“Well, is that likely to incite hate?”

 

And it doesn’t have to be abusive, threatening or insulting. Somebody just has to say:

 

“Well, could that make people dislike migrants? Could that make people hate them?”

 

And all of a sudden, because you’re not on the BBC, the social media platform you’re on, because they’re talking about bringing back the Online Safety Bill again, but making it more robust.

 

So the platform you’re on is going to get a fine, you’re going to get a knock on the door, and it will make it very difficult for people to actually say really anything unless they’re part of the establishment. And if they’re part of the establishment, they’re going to say nothing anyway!

 

So that’s that!

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, it is, literally. Look, they’re criminalizing dissent, at the end of the day. And we saw this play out in the Covid pandemic, which is any dissent is instantly labelled “far-Right”.

 

And yet they will never, they will never define far-Right! I think that’s something we all need to push for, is a definition. This is a term they use all the time. What do they mean by that? Because if they can define it, you’ll find that most people will fall outside of it, or their definition is going to be so broad that it will encompass the whole of the British public. But it is something we need to hold them to account on, which is you keep using this term and yet you refuse to define it’s going to be a difficult one.

 

[19:09]

 

Mark Collett: Well, without tooting my own horn, I will say this. I predicted this years ago, but without using the term “far-Right”, I made a video years ago called What is a Nazi? And it had a provocative title because I wanted people to watch it. But at the time, the term “Nazi” was being, was the sort of go to term for anyone who said anything about immigration, said anything about multiculturalism, criticised the behaviour or criminal behaviour of migrant groups. You were called a Nazi. But Nazi was never defined.

 

However, it was made absolutely clear that it was okay to punch a Nazi. And you had Richard Spencer punched. And all these Lefties were putting the footage of Richard Spencer being punched in the face into their YouTube videos thinking it was hilarious! Punch a Nazi was trending on Twitter. And I was saying:

 

“Well, what is a Nazi?”

 

This is the problem when you get to call anyone you want a “Nazi”, but equally, you get to punch anyone who’s a “Nazi”, it gives you pretty much carte blanche to punch anyone you want because you’ve branded them this sort of cover-all word for somebody that you don’t like. Because that’s all it is. You know, no one’s properly going to define what I am.

 

And I’ve always been quite, … If I’m in public, I’m talking to normal people, I’m a nationalist. If I’m talking to people like yourself, my audience, people who are more initiated, I will differentiate and say I’m an ethno-nationalist because I believe there is more to nationalism than just waving a flag and living on a patch of land. I believe it’s blood and soil.

 

Now, that’s very important definition. But at that point, if you were to sell that to normal people and say to normal people:

 

“Look, I believe that to be an indigenous Brit, which is who I represent, you have to be of European stock and you have to have British ancestry that goes back a number of generations.”

 

And it is more likely that Europeans who have come here will integrate. And because of that, we want to restrict mass immigration from the developing and third world into Britain and put strict quotas, for that matter, on people coming from Europe because we don’t want to be chopping up our countryside, destroying our last bits of ancient forest and living like basically, like I said, sardines in a can. We don’t want to live that.

 

Now, if you say that to normal people, most normal people would say:

 

“This guy’s not a Nazi, he’s talking common sense!”

 

But according to the Left, you could just walk up to me and punch me in the side of the head for saying that. And you get polite applause from people in power.

 

And remember, at the time, all of this was sort of bubbling away, people like Theresa May were quite happy for people to be punched. People in the Conservative Party were quite happy for these terms to be thrown around and people to be victimized.

 

But now “far-Right” is a much wider reaching slogan. And that’s where I was wrong. I thought they were going to leave it at Nazi. So Nazis, the ultimate bad guy, you call some a Nazi, it gives them the right to hit them.

 

But now it’s far-Right. But what does far-Right apply to? Because the Guardian and certain certain large sections of the broadcast media, they would say anyone in Reform and Nigel Farage are far-Right.

 

So at that point I think they’d have a problem defining it. So they won’t it’ll be a law that’s purposely fuzzy around the edges, an umbrella law that can be applied, as and when they see fit.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, exactly that. A lot of this legislation that’s coming through now is so vague. The Online Harm’s Bill, again, everything in there is vague. And we know why they do it. They do it so that they can use it against anyone they wish to, any time they wish to. And they don’t have to apply it when they don’t want to.

 

I know you’ve been talking about it and I’ve also, I mean I was on a stream last week and I was saying:

 

“Look, the thing we need to be pushing for now is a White British advocacy group.”

 

That was picked up by Academic Agent and re-shared the video that I did saying we need a White British advocacy group, that can liaise between the public and the authorities, that can liaise between the public and the press. And it’s going to have to be a group that isn’t political.

 

A lot of people said:

 

“Well what about Nigel Farage? You know, he’d be great as a, as an advocacy for the White British working class.”

 

The problem is he’s part of a political party and it would then look like actually what he’s doing is campaigning for votes.

 

What we need is someone that isn’t a political party that is set up to advocate for the rights of the White British! And I say White British because that’s the government’s own terminology so it can’t be used against us. It’s what’s on the census forms. But that organisation needs to look at all criminal cases, but not just criminal, social injustice. And it needs to contact local MP’s where this is happening and demand a response:

 

“This is happening in your area. Are you aware of it? If you are, what are you doing about it? If you’re not aware of it now, you are. What is your response? And we require a response from you!”

 

And then we can contact the press and then we can contact the police.

 

If there’s a riot, or a protest with any other group the police will go and speak to “community leaders”. Now these community leaders aren’t voted in by the Asian community or by the Somalian community or by the Afghanistani community. These are self appointed community leaders. We need someone, some advocacy group that is going to be the community leader for the White British, so that if there’s a protest going on, they go and speak to them and maybe we can get to the term where we can tell them how to police it, which is what happens in all other cases. It’s a hard ask! And I’ve said this on the stream, it’s going to take money to build an organisation like that. And it’s going to take ongoing commitment. But this doesn’t need a billionaire backer. It doesn’t need a millionaire. I’ll tell you what it needs. It needs the people! It needs the people listening to this to go, do you know what? We do need one. And if every single person gives a little bit, all of those little bits add up to, enough!

 

You’ve just raised 8,000 pounds for the families. We need to be doing this on a regular basis. We need legal representation. We need to be able to hire top class legal representation. We need to fight these cases! We need to fight these cases, as many as we can, and tie up the legal system, right? And it’s going to take time, it’s going to take money, but this is something that we have to do and is possible to do! So we need to do it.

 

[27:04]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree, and I don’t know if you heard all the intro that I gave while you were sort of coming into the house, but I was talking about the outreach campaign that PA are doing at the moment. We’ve raised over 8,000 pounds for families have been affected by these harsh sentences and this two tier justice system.

 

We’re already creating an outreach for prisoners and we’ve split because, look, I know that some of the people who have been jailed probably did pretty stupid things. So, like if somebody tried to set fire to a building or torched a car or was out looting, we’re not going to be raising money for them. But we are raising money for people who said things on social media who have been jailed for non-crimes or arrested for non-crimes or jailed harshly for minor crimes. So there’s been a major abuse of sentencing. And we’re doing that.

 

And also what you said about liaising with the police, we do that regularly. So we had a demonstration in Hull recently. I’m proud to say we’re the only nationalist group in the whole of the UK that during those anti-migrant protests, we didn’t turtle, we didn’t disappear, we went out, we were on the streets, we did a protest, we liaised with the police and we had about 60, 70 people at the protest. It was really, really good!

 

But it wasn’t just good, if you watched it, where was the police presence? Well, we had two police liaison officers, because we sorted it out with them beforehand. I speak to them in advance, I run through the things we want to do, I come up with a plan, I decide with them, where we’re going to meet up, how long it’s going to last, how we’re going to arrive, how we’re going to leave, know, assurances are given.

 

So, for example, if it’s a PA protest, I always say to the police:

 

“Look, when we’re done, everybody who is with us will immediately depart the area of the protest and we will drive, you know, 10, 15 minutes away to go for a drink and have something to eat. No one is sent onto a city centre, no one’s sent down the road to the pub around the corner.”

 

And we reassure the police that we are going to do that peacefully. So when you see a PA protest, there isn’t lines of riot police in the shot because they’re simply not there. You saw that in Leeds when we did the protest and demonstration in Leeds when Sam was jailed. And you can do these things if you’re willing to actually engage. And we have engaged at every level.

 

So when they were thinking of bringing in the new extremism laws under the Conservatives, we wrote a robust letter to both Mark Rowley and to Sarah Khan laying out our points and basically voicing our disgust that we were mentioned that way. The same when Michael Gove mentioned us in Parliament.

 

And I think one of the big problems we’ve got as nationalists, and this does need discussing, and I’ve said this to people privately. So many nationalists have been so used to taking a beating and I mean that metaphorically and sometimes literally, that every time some injustice occurs, they just take it! They’re completely stoic and they take it.

 

However, we found that if you start issuing legal letters, if you start writing to the prisons, if you start protesting, if you work within a reasonable framework and adopt some of the tactics that the Left used in the 1960s during the Civil Rights Movement that can be directly applied to our movement.

 

And you and I have had long chats offline, I made no bones about this. I am not a huge fan of the electoral system. I’ve got an article actually, that’s being published in Heritage and Destiny laying out what I believe is that it’s a 3, 500 word article. It comes out in this month’s Heritage and Destiny, laying out what I believe is the future for the movement. I think ethno-nationalists need to get serious. Adopt a White civil rights approach. Stop messing about with these Parliamentary elections. If we do fight elections, they have to be on the basis of nationalist independence in localised areas where we can win.

 

But we have to focus on the things that we can do where we not just pouring tens of thousands of pounds into an electoral system that’s stacked against us, where we’re going to get 0.7% of the vote and be a footnote at the end of the election.

 

So when you look down that table and you see the top three, the only votes that count are the votes for the winning candidate. That’s the first thing.

 

But when you look down that table and you see others down below, outside of the top three, we’re just that little footnote in that election. But it might have cost us two and a half, 5,000, 10,000 pounds to fight just one Parliamentary by-election. And for what? For nothing!

 

But as you will be able to tell us, 10,000 pounds could go a long way for other things.

 

[32:21]

 

The Woodlander: Look, you’re talking my language! I was involved with the BNP, I think, before, I left when you joined, probably. I did a lot of looking. I spent a decade working within those organisations, those small political parties and activist groups. And it’s just apparent. It was apparent that the system was never going to allow those people near the levers of power. It might allow them to climb up slightly so that they were viewed by the public, and then they were squashed! And that was visibly seen by the public.

 

I watched UKIP rise from the back pages of This is England magazine, as this tiny little group under Goldsmith, be co-opted and turned into a pressure valve for the British people to allow their frustrations to come out. But it was never going anywhere as a political organisation! The political route has been blocked for quite a while.

 

And if you look back through nationalist history, the BNP was the most successful in a hundred years! A hundred years! Thousands of people, millions of man hours, millions upon millions of pounds spent to get us to the position we are now! Which is still exactly where we were 100 years ago, out there in the Wilderness.

 

If in just the last 30 years, we put those man hours and that money into buying property, into buying land, into investing in our people’s businesses, right, we would be the wealthiest organisation in this country. We would then be able to, … It’s not political people that hold the power. The Conservative Party might have been a very powerful political party, but I can promise you they were beholden to the people that fund them! They’re beholden to people like the building industry. They’re beholden to the man that gives him half a million quid. They have to do what they want. And this has been going on for years now.

 

People need to understand the real power comes through being powerful! Businesses, landowners, corporations. And this is something, this is an Avenue we haven’t explored. I think I heard you say the other day:

 

“This is fertile ground!”

 

Mark Collett: What I actually said was basically Morgoth. Morgoth said:

 

“Nature hates open soil! And it immediately tries to claim open soil and something will grow there.”

 

And that was an interesting point. But what isn’t open soil, what’s already a tangled mass, an overgrown mess, is the political space. And at the moment, the biggest and most fertile growth in that open space, from our perspective, is Reform.

 

And no one’s going past that. They’re going to live underneath it. It’ll block out the sunlight. And there isn’t going to be any nationalist tree under that because there’s not space.

 

However, there is fertile open ground adjacent to where Reform is. And that’s what I’m talking about going into. I’m talking about White civil rights, I’m talking about land acquisition, I’m talking about advocacy, I’m talking about what the Left did in the 1960s.

 

Now, the British people, I talked about this last week, so we’re not going to go back over this, but I said basically last week on PWR that the British people have been conditioned that the civil rights approach is the right approach. You can’t undo that conditioning. So all we have to do is apply that approach to our cause and they will naturally see our cause in a different light, which is important.

 

But something else is important. Now, I’ve been mischaracterized on this, and I think I’d like you to sort of speak about a little bit about this as well, because you and I have talked about it offline. You don’t have to unmute your mic, but did you see the debate I did with the “little man”? Yes. Well, the little man tried to mischaracterize me and say that I wanted to sort of go and live in tiny enclaves where there was like six or seven of us, and I just die there peacefully. That’s not true.

 

I’m saying go to somewhere like Savile town in Dewsbury and what do you see? An entire functioning Muslim community with its own schools, its own shops, its own community centres, its own religious buildings, its own medical care. They have their own food, their own clothes, the signs are in their own language.

 

The whole thing is its not three houses on an estate next door to each other. They just barbecue together on every other Sunday. It’s an entire community!

 

And if the rest of Britain said:

 

“Right, we’re never coming to Savile town again.”

 

They would completely, as long as they could get their food and their amenities in there, they would still function completely as they were. They don’t need outside people. They even have their own supermarkets.

 

And I’m not talking about three or four houses. I’m saying that if we want power, power comes from a heartland like that. And once you own the institutions within that heartland, it bonds the people in the heartland together so they are more likely to act as a group. We have nothing like that. And people can laugh at me and say:

 

“Oh, what are you going to do? Run away to a tiny Hamlet and have eight little houses together?”

 

Well if it starts with eight little houses, it starts with eight little houses. But what I’m saying is there are parts of the country that are still 90% White. British little towns, villages that could become White heartlands where nationalists move to and capture the local amenities, take over the local community centre, run the scouts. You know, if there’s a local they don’t call them schools anymore, but there’s academies where parents essentially run them as a cooperative. Why home-school? Who wants to home-school when you’ve got your own school that the parents run! And that’s what the Muslims do.

 

[39:32]

 

The Woodlander: This all comes down to one thing, which, and I think this is happening, which is we have to collectivise, we have to understand we are a group. For far too long we’ve all thought of ourselves as individuals, but we’re the only group that thinks of ourselves as individuals, and that’s always going to leave us at a disadvantage.

 

But you’re dead right about. I mean I’ve also had a back and forth with young Alec and I give him his due, I respect his enthusiasm. He’s kind of where I was 30 years ago and I’ve tried to explain some things to him and I think he doesn’t quite understand what I’m saying, which is, that’s fine. It’s not about cutting yourself off. I mean it did get to the point where he said:

 

“You know, anybody who leaves a big city to try and improve their life is a coward!”

 

And I don’t really know how to answer that.

 

Mark Collett: I do! I can answer it for you. I can answer it if somebody says that to me, I say:

 

“Well, then you’re a dickhead!”

 

Because fundamentally, if you’ve got a daughter or young children and they’re going to be a hated minority and their life is going to be a living nightmare, because you’re in a city centre and you can take them to an area where they can flourish and you can help them. If you don’t do that, you’re not [word unclear], everyone wants the best start.

 

The Woodlander: I mean, I know that that. I think he’s a bit confused. But what you’re saying is dead right. The argument against it is not everyone can afford to do that. Well, actually, you might be right in the beginning, but here’s what happens when you start to take control of an area is, you do buy property, and then you can say to those people still stuck in cities:

 

“Listen, do you want somewhere to live? Because we’ve got some properties and we can help you out here.”

 

So you can actually start to help your people, really help them! Not by saying:

 

“In 15 years time we might be able to halfway get into a council.”

 

No, that’s not really helping your people. If I say to a young man in Manchester who desperately wants to get out because he’s got a wife and a young daughter:

 

“Well, I’ll tell you what, I’ve got a two bedroom house here, right? It’s usually going for 300,000. We’ll arrange the mortgage for you because we’ve got a special deal and it will cost you no more than the house you’re renting at the moment!”

 

Now I’m helping someone. Now I’m able to help our people.

 

People know what I’m doing, buying land. And there’s two parts to that. There’s the initiative, which is open to everyone in our group, so members can use that land.

 

But there’s also members that want their own part. They want to buy their own bit of land, and that’s cool! By grouping these people together, we’ve now actually managed to buy two, three plots of land where people own their own individual plot. What they do with that and how we work that, right, is interesting because I spent hours upon hours talking to a solicitor the other day who actually said:

 

“I think we’ve got it nailed down. I should be able to get something through so you can put buildings on that land for people to live, legally.”

 

Now, if it comes off, I could be saying to people:

 

“Listen, I’ve got a two bedroom house. It’s ten grand. Ten grand! Are you interested?”

 

Now, this is real positive steps forward, right? I mean, I’ve got young children. I say young. My boys are in their thirties. And one of them is in a rented accommodation, the same as many 30 year olds. He’s got a wife, he’s got a baby and it’s a tiny little place and he can’t afford anything else. They’re working people, they can’t afford to move, they can’t even afford a place with a garden! And that’s horrendous! So imagine how good I feel when I say:

 

“Well, here is a two bedroom house. Have it!”

 

Why? Because I can build that. And with the people I’ve got involved with me, we could probably knock it up in a weekend. I’ve got builders in there, carpenters in there, I’ve got wood merchants in that group. We’ve got every skill you could possibly think of, right? We’re going down to some land that we own at the end of this month to build toilet facilities, shower facilities, so that people who do go there camping, especially the young ladies, have got somewhere they can clean up and go to the lavatory. Not like the gentlemen who just go beyond the oak tree. But that will be built over two days!

 

We can do that because we’re collectivising! We’re coming together to do something in a positive way that will help people. So much better than saying:

 

“Do, you know what? Join the group, give us ten pounds and hopefully in 20 years we’ll sweep to power.”

 

Which is a fantasy! I don’t know what to say, really.

 

[45:05]

 

Mark Collett: Look, I fundamentally agree with you. And this idea that we’re going to get success in the places where we are the smallest minority and have the most pushing against us is just idiotic! I mean, it’s like me saying to somebody, look:

 

“Your military is most likely to break through in the area where the enemy is strongest.”

 

People would laugh at you. That’s the analogy. To create a situation where we can break through, we need tactical withdrawal from the cities and towns that we’ve lost.

 

So, it’s like saying to somebody, I think Newham in London. So if you look at all 331 council boroughs in England, so you’ve got, like, bigger ones like Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester, then you’ve got smaller ones. And London’s made up of multiple council areas, but the worst council area out of them all in the whole of the UK is Newham, which is only 14% White British.

 

Now, anyone that would suggest that would be a fertile ground for us would be insane! You would actually be looking for the ones where we were in abundance.

 

For example, you know, no one would say to a Muslim cleric:

 

“The place you’re going to do the best is in a place that’s 90% White British and there’s only three Muslims.”

 

That’s why they cluster together. But I want to say this as well. Woodlander Initiative is not PA. I don’t own this. Many of people who are members of PA are part of Woodlander Initiative, but I absolutely endorse this. I absolutely endorse this! And what this man’s doing is amazing!

 

And everyone should endorse this, because it’s a genuine solution. It’s something that works hand in hand with other solutions as well. So PA aren’t buying land and putting up toilet blocks. We’re not doing that. This guy is. This guy is Pooling money to purchase land. But Woodland isn’t doing the White civil rights stuff, that’s us. We can work together, the two groups can work together and we can help each other. And we’re already working with groups like Workers of England, Union. We’re already doing legal advocacy in that way and we intend to continue. It’s a good idea.

 

But let’s just segue away because we talked today, I have three things that I wanted to talk to you about. One was your solutions. The other was two tier justice.

 

But there is an increasing number of White British ethno-nationalists that are now leaving the UK to live abroad and some of them are forced to do that. Obviously, everyone knows Tommy Robinson’s left.

 

There’s been a lot of talk about David Clews because he has been wrongly named by papers, he’s been singled out by the government. They seem intent on destroying that man’s life and his wife’s life. And he has now left the UK.

 

And interestingly, as these people were leaving the UK, Russia have now made overtures to people in the West who are victims of what they have called “Western neo-liberal policy”.

 

And I’m not going to just talk about Russia because if I do, there’ll be a load of people going:

 

“Ahh! But this and that and the other!”

 

I’m going to talk in a broader sense. Russia aren’t the only country doing this. There are other Eastern European countries that have welcomed White dissident political figures and their supporters on the basis that:

 

“If you come here, you stick by the laws, you don’t do any harm to our government and you just basically want to criticise British government from our soil. You can live here in peace and we’ve got no problem with it.”

 

What do you think about that for a solution? Because it’s one of those interesting points where I don’t want to sound like I want to run away, but a lot of people are looking at this seriously.

 

The Woodlander: I’ve had the “running away” finger pointed at me so many times, I’ve lost interest with it. I’ve had the opportunity to move out of the country quite a few times. My parents moved out of the country, moved to Spain for many reasons. They just saw the country they once loved slowly becoming worse. So they moved to Spain. I could have moved out there. It was a much better standard of living, a better healthcare system, but I didn’t. I stayed.

 

I stayed and built a business, and I’ve got grandkids here now. I completely understand why someone would. If someone’s single, or a young couple, there are better countries. And that’s a horrible thing to say! And it leaves a sour taste in my mouth to say it. But sadly, Britain is becoming so restrictive, I mean, massively restrictive! And I don’t see that getting any better. We will have to wait and see.

 

But I think next year is going to be a turning point. They’ve been very open with that date of 2025 and again, 2030 on loads of different documents, they seem to be specific dates. That could be why he’s going in so hard and fast now. The Online Harms Bill, the new legislation, it just doesn’t look good.

 

There is another group in America as well, I mean, you’ve talked about Eastern Europe and Russia, the Return to the Land organisation, who’s run by one of our guys in the Ozarks area in the States. They purchased 158 acres. That was their first purchase. Broken up into roughly three acre plots. They’re building hash homes. They’ve built a school, they’ve got an academy. They’ve got businesses set up on the land. They reckon they will be able to take over their local government, the sheriff and the local government within two years, because there’ll be more of them than there are people in the village. It’s quite interesting. So there are opportunities outside of this country.

 

What I would like to see is groups like PA, groups like the Woodlander Initiative, groups like the British Democrats that are running the political site, coming together, sitting around a table, and working out a way forward where we can all work together. Right? This has needed to be done for a long time, and I’m up for that. I think we can do something here, I really do. But it would be handy to have people in other countries, just in case it all goes pear shaped.

 

[52:34]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree, and I’ve been to one of these unity meetings, and other than two people who stormed out like children, everyone else got on and agreed to a plan of action.

 

And one of those plans of action was not to stand against each other. If there was going to be a demonstration, the idea was that groups would ask each other first. We would try not to hold demonstrations more than sort of once every four to six weeks, because it was destroying the demonstration scene. Good ground was made and lots of people who saw that were interested in attending future unity meeting. So maybe you and I should have a talk about that and arrange that.

 

But one thing I’ve got to say is I’ve never been drawn to going to Spain, but I do have a particular fantasy. And before anyone says anything funny in the chat, not that type of fantasy. I love these places where you can buy sort of 8 square kilometres woodland, and then there’s a house made of glass, wood and steel in the middle of it.

 

And it’s like one of these super technical, modern like, but retro buildings at the same time. So it’s all modern and beautiful and spacious, but it’s made of wood and glass. And when you wake up in the morning, you see the forest and you’re surrounded by the trees.

 

And that would be more my style than running away to the south of Spain for what they get in Spain. I’m not really up for that. But if I was going to go, which I have no plans to, that would be my, … You know, the sort of thing. I mean, where if you bought it in this country, it would set you back like one and a half million, but if you bought it in some Eastern European country, it would be like 150 grand!

 

The Woodlander: Well, again, I’ve been speaking to the lads on the Return to the Land Organisation in the States. Their land has increased in value massively just by doing the work they’ve done on it together.

 

And I can give you some sort of example just on the plot I bought. I bought two acres of woodland, I built a cabin. I didn’t break any laws to do it. And it’s here and it’s fine. I built this. It’s increased in value now about 500%, which isn’t a bad markup. So there’s things you can do and there’s things you can do as an organisation and as a company, where you can generate income and then you can plough that back into helping our people, which is all I’m actually doing.

 

There’s so many more avenues where we can help the people and that includes political parties that we want to back as well. For too many years I’ve listened to people say things like:

 

“Oh yeah, but we’ve got no financial backers.”

 

Okay, that’s fine. Let’s grow our own then! Let’s build some businesses where people do become wealthy and they can put money into it. Laura knows this all too well. You know, she started the tea company and that’s a fantastic thing! But we should be looking at all of our people that want to start businesses, help them out, build them up, have somewhere that they can advertise their goods, all of this sort of thing. Grow the businesses and that money will come back into our group. It’s obvious, really.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I fundamentally agree, and that is what other groups do.

 

And I’ve said this on streams before. You know, when Mr Akhtar wants to buy two new tyres for his car to get it MOT’d, he goes down to Mr Javid’s tyre yard. And when they take it to get the car MOT’d because he’s got his new tyres on they go to Mohammed’s MOT centre. They don’t go to the big chain organisation like Quick Fit. They don’t go to the little White guy on the other side of town and give him their business. They keep their money in their own communities. And that’s something you can’t do if you live in an area where you’re a tiny minority.

 

And to me, what you’re saying with what they’re doing in America, it’s funny because all these people who talk about the need to fight elections, they don’t understand how you win elections. You win elections from having a community group. Let’s say, because Australia and America are great examples of this. I’m a huge fan of watching real crime documentaries. And when you’re watching these, you often find out about almost abandoned towns in places like America and Australia because sometimes horrible things happen there and you’re watching it and they say this almost abandoned town in Australia was a place where the criminals took their, … You’re thinking:

 

“How can there be an entire town that’s abandoned?”

 

But if a hundred nationalists move to that almost abandoned town where there’s only 100 people there currently, well, straight away they’ve got 50% of the vote and the electoral side of it comes naturally, off the back of just being a natural majority.

 

And like you said, with these guys in the States, by the time they rejuvenated one of these small towns that they bought land up around and they’ve got 100 families living there, it won’t matter whether people hate them. It won’t matter whether there’s an anti-fascist candidate. It won’t matter if a group like an American version of Hope Not Hate comes and leaflets every house, they’re automatically winning every single election! Just as Muslim groups have done here. And these things, ironically, the things that we’re talking about, despite us saying the electoral route is off limits to us at the moment, the things we’re talking about would actually allow for total electoral victory on a local level!

 

[58:52]

 

The Woodlander: Exactly that! If you have enough people an area, you win the council seat and you run the council. And the money comes down from government and you spend it in your community, you hand it out to the projects that you want to. And we understand this because when it was called the “Loony Left” in the eighties and they were getting the money from government and they were spending all these stupid Left-wing projects, we could do exactly the same. But for our people! It’s not rocket science, right?

 

But in order to do that, you need to take control of the area with the people first. So either buy the land and build the homes, or buy the homes and move in the people, grow businesses, buy property, all of these different Avenues, which we haven’t done before. And within two to three years, you are a very powerful groups, and able to help!

 

Mark Collett: Also, I do think at the moment, and this goes in the face of what we just said, there is a viable route for ethno-nationalists who are not face out and have not shown their hand publicly to get elected. And that is actually through the Reform Party. For the first time in the history of electoral politics in the UK, a political party standing on an anti-immigration platform has returned candidates to Parliament.

 

Now, this presents opportunities, but it also presents pitfalls. No one is going up against them and beating them. In fact, they will destroy anyone who goes up against them.

 

Secondly, going up against them would actually be a really stupid thing. And I said this to someone the other day, I said:

 

“What’s going to happen if people keep thinking along the lines of the electoral route is there’s going to be five tiny nationalist parties, the Heritage party, British Democrats, you know, Reclaim, several of them will all stand in a Parliamentary by-election. Reform will also stand. Reform will take about 12,000 votes. These parties will all take 200 each, totalling 1,000 votes and Labour will get 12, 100 votes.”

 

And you’re actually going to get a situation where squabbling tiny nationalist parties that didn’t get a significant portion of the vote actually ensured that Labour took a seat and that would be a disaster?

 

Now, if you are a young, bright male or female, you’re looking at the ethno-nationalist movement and you’re thinking:

 

“Look, Mark, look, Woodlander, I really like what you’re saying, but I am really passionate about elections. I want to be out canvassing, I want to be out leafleting, I want to be out knocking on doors and asking for people’s votes. I want to do that. And Mark, you did that when you were younger.”

 

My advice is go and do it! But basically cut ties or cut public ties with any ethno-nationalist group. Don’t go face out for ethno-nationalism. Enter Reform. Keep your views intact, keep watching these shows, keep your close friends. You aren’t going to tell people what you’re up to. Move through the ranks of Reform, get yourself on that Parliamentary ticket and maybe in five years you’ll be an MP! At which point you can use your Parliamentary privilege to say what you want about mass immigration and Keir Starmer and two tier policing!

 

The Woodlander: It’s far easier to do, than you would realise. When I left the BNP, in 1997 when Blair was elected and I’ve been following his trajectory. I joined the Conservative Party and everyone was like:

 

“What are you doing?”

 

But I joined it at a time when they were at the time at their lowest point. And I wanted to see would it be possible to move nationalists into the Conservative Party and move it to the Right. Within three months of joining the Conservative Party, I sat on the European committee. I was shadowing an MP at the House of Commons. They were already talking about putting me into a safe seat as an MP in two years time. They put me down to run as a councillor, even though I said even if I won, I wasn’t going to run as a councillor. They were saying:

 

“No, but what we want to do is get your name on the ticket so that you’re a known brand. We will then take you out of the council thing and put you into the MP bracket.”

 

All of these different things. And yes, I met Thatcher, had dinner with Portillo, and all of this stuff. All my opinions never changed. I didn’t change my opinions! But I’m able to talk to Lord Stockton 1 minute and my mate works at the rubbish tip the next without annoying either of them. So it’s just common sense really, how you move through those ranks.

 

You would find if you joined Reform that you wouldn’t need to keep your views to yourself. I bet 90% of the people, the grassroots membership, which is what I found in the Conservative Party, that the grassroots membership of that party were just as Right-wing as I was, really! It’s just when you get to that very top level, when you get to the Tices, when you get to the Farages, they are corrupt at that top level!

 

And that’s what I found with all of the MP’s that I was mixing with and talking to and watching the dealings that was going on. It was corrupt as hell! But below them there is an opportunity to speak to people, to explain things to people, to move the whole thing further to our point of view. Without a shadow of a doubt!

 

[1:05:26]

 

Mark Collett: I completely agree. And I think it’s sort of we could do this Superchat out of order because ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“In my opinion, one does not expect exclude the other. Why not do both build communities and seek political power at the same time?”

 

I think we’re kind of answering this now. There’s two ways that we can gain political power.

 

The first is build the communities and then local power would naturally come from that.

 

And secondly, using what is now an established and very electable brand, to parachute our people into winnable seats.

 

And I think in five years, time. Look, Stamar’s already crashed the plane, you know, he has already taken it into a nosedive. Look at what he’s managed to screw up in a month and a half. You’ve had multiple stabbings of people, all by migrants. You’ve got him going mental and calling for two tier policing and restrictive new laws. You’ve got them cutting winter fuel allowance for 10 million British pensioners. When we say British pensioners, look at the population pyramid. Pensioners in this country are the Whitest segment of the population pyramid.

 

So you’re going to be talking 90% of people affect the by that, if not more, will be White. He’s cutting their winter fuel allowance. He’s also talking about upping inheritance tax and screwing families out of their family homes.

 

They’re talking about pay per mile taxation for your car. So you’re not just going to go and get your car tax, you know. So I know people who’ve got very small and efficient petrol cars where you don’t pay any tax on them, because they fall under the threshold because they don’t present any form of pollutant.

 

And also I do know people with electric cars, not that I’d want an electric car myself. And they don’t pay any tax because they don’t use fossil fuels.

 

Now, these people are soon going to be told that you are going to be taxed and you’re going to have to fit a little black box to your car and every mile you go, you’re going to have to pay so many Pence to the government. And also that little black box will track you wherever you go and let the government know where you are at any given time. Labour are going full in on this! And they’re also going full in on allowing migrants to come here!

 

And I think it’s only a matter of time, and this is a pretty safe bet. It’s only a matter of time before eventually they have some kind of amnesty and they say:

 

“Look, all these illegal immigrants, they’re now British, so they’re staying here.”

 

Now, all of this is going to build Reform into, especially in Red Wall areas, the official opposition. You’ve already got 34 seats where Reform are in second place. And that second place when the Tories are in government. Imagine what it’s going to be after five years of Labour, after five years of Labour. People are going to be seething!

 

And what’s more, many of the people who have been unfairly arrested being victims of this two tier policing, live in Red Wall areas. I think embedding yourself in the Reform Party now and looking to four or five years down the line, that could be an electoral solution. Look, I’ve been in political parties before. There are very few activists. So the BNP, even at its height, with 14 and a half thousand members at its annual conference, just under 200 people, that was its key activist base.

 

Now, I should imagine Reforms will be probably about the same, because it’s a very elderly party. There’s a lot of older people in it. A young, active, fiery person willing to go leafleting once or twice a week is immediately going to be the go to person in that branch or in that region to take the best seat, because most of the people they have just won’t be active.

 

The Woodlander: No. And that’s the point. If you’re actually willing to do things within a political party, because most people are, most people are members, but never do anything.

 

If you want to get involved and you volunteer for things, you’ll be the guy running the Reform business club, which is what I did at the Conservatives. So I ran the Conservative business club. I was instrumental when rebuilding the Young Conservatives in the southwest. I started a new group called the Thirties to Forties Club, which was after young Conservatives of the 30 to 40s.

 

Now, all of these things were things that I said:

 

“Well you know why don’t we do this?”

 

When you’re talking to a bunch of people, … When I joined, the average age was 75, maybe 76. That was the average age of the people in the Conservative Association in the southwest. And it was like they didn’t do anything! Apart from their luncheons or their suppers once a month. And they’d have a speaker and they put some money in a kitty. They didn’t do anything.

 

So if you get someone who’s in there who’s active, who says:

 

“Look, we should be doing this, we want to get active on social media. We could do this. Let’s start a new group to get involved with education.”

 

You’ll be the guy they’ll be looking to get it done. It may as well be our guys in there doing this. That’s better for us. And in the long run it’s better for Reform as well. You will find Reform slowly moving to our way of thinking.

 

[1:11:32]

 

Mark Collett: I completely agree. Well, we’ve got another chat on this issue, which we’ll do out of sync. Jez 9999 said:

 

“If what the majority of the membership thought mattered, the Conservatives would have massively cut immigration. Joining Reform and trying to say anything Farage considers unacceptable is a complete waste of time. You’ll be kicked out immediately!”

 

We’re not saying join Reform. And then whip out your copy of your favourite nationalist book and say to Farage:

 

“Right, read this. This is what we need to do.”

 

What we’re saying is go into that party. They are understaffed and undermanned at local level. Go into the party, show enthusiasm, talk enthusiastically about things you can talk about in the party, such as migration control, deporting illegals, etcetera. You will soon be very well liked and you will soon be the branch organiser for somewhere like Sunderland.

 

You know, once you’re the branch organiser for Sunderland and you’re out leafleting every week, you’re going to be the guy that they ask to be the local Parliamentary candidate. And in places like Sunderland, I believe Reform are already on 34% of the vote. Well, that 34% is only going to rise dramatically when many pensions in Sunderland this winter and subsequent winters leading up to the next general election can’t heat their homes because Rachel Reeves cut their fuel allowance so she could divert more money to the huge and growing number of illegal immigrants still living in hotels all around the country!

 

These are things that people can do. No one is saying:

 

“Join Reform. Go in there and try to red pill everybody in there and show them all Europa: The Last Battle, or The Greatest Story Never Told!”

 

Don’t go up to Farage and say:

 

“Look, you need to watch The Greatest Story Never Told, mate. There was this guy in Germany and he had some good ideas.”

 

Don’t do that. That’d be idiotic! It’s about people who want to fight electorally should basically go into Reform, keep their heads down, play the game, get elected to Parliament, then use their Parliamentary privilege to go full mask off. It’s simple! Do you have anything to add to that, mate?

 

The Woodlander: No, I’ve got to be honest. I think Reforms there because they’re allowed to be there is, but whilst they are there, they’ve done something that no nationalist group has ever managed to do, and get into Parliament. To not take advantage of that, if it’s possible, would be a ludicrous situation. It really would. That’s a much easier route to Parliamentary power than starting a new political party and building up over 20 years, only to find at the end of it that they won’t allow you anywhere near power. That’s a wasted two decades!

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, to be frank, anyone who has started one of these micro parties over the last few years, they are going to face three huge problems.

 

One, they are never going to have the membership, activist or support base.

 

Number two, they are never going to have the money, the funding, the wealth.

 

And number three, they are never going to have a celebrity candidate who is a household name and who has a proven track record of breaking political barriers that nobody else has ever broken before.

 

Farage has achieved three things that no one else in the history of British politics has achieved! He won two national elections for two separate political parties. He took total victory in 2014 for UKIP. He took total victory in 2019 for the Brexit Party. He then went on to make the most significant policy change against the flow of policy that anyone’s ever made, which was the bringing about of Brexit.

 

And finally, he’s the only anti-immigration candidate who runs an anti-immigration party that has broken that Parliamentary barrier.

 

Nobody in the next four or five years before the next general election could build anything like that. It would take decades to achieve that.

 

And what’s more, decades is a period of time that we do not have. If somebody tells me that they’ve got a long game that can get us Parliamentary seats in, … Because Farage has been doing this since about 1999, I believe. So it’s taken him sort of two and a half decades to break that barrier. Two and a half decades. If somebody said to me today:

 

“We have a plan and it’s going to be two and a half decades and it’s going to get us five or six MP’s.”

 

I would actually look at them and say:

 

“Even if you could guarantee that, would that give us the time span to actually get a workable majority and reverse anything?”

 

The Woodlander: We haven’t got 20 years. I think we both know that. I think things are going to get harder and harder and harder for smaller groups. They’re going to get harder and harder and harder for individuals to actually say anything! The whole system is geared against us! The government have come out and said:

 

“Here’s the enemy! Guess what? It’s you! You are the enemy! The chances of you sweeping to power are zero. It’s not going to happen!”

 

It hasn’t happened in a hundred years. And I hear people saying:

 

“Yeah, but times are different now.”

 

Yes, they are. It’s harder now! It’s harder now than it was in the thirties, the forties, sixties, seventies, eighties or nineties k, it is harder now. It’s not going to happen! They’re going to make it harder.

 

So if there’s a possibility of moving a party further to our point of view, that’s already got some power, it would be ludicrous to ignore that.

 

[1:18:34]

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

And I think what you said there the term “ludicrous”, I don’t think that is an over exaggeration. You know, the thing is, what people have got to remember is over the last 5, 10 years, Farage has fundamentally, I’m not saying completely, but has fundamentally come in our direction to a large degree. And I keep stressing this point because it does need stressing. Nigel Farage was talking about things in this electoral cycle and addressing those issues in a way that the BNP at its height did not. You know, so the British National Party Party, when it won elections, never said, “we need to start deporting people”. That was a point that internally we were briefed, do not bring that up!

 

In fact, when I was in the British National Party, the British National Party changed its policy. The British National Party changed its policy from compulsory repatriation to voluntary repatriation and actually downplayed that on its website.

 

So there was a complete change in our approach to deportations, whether they would be illegal immigrants, etcetera, because it wasn’t a selling point.

 

In fact, at the time, people in the BNP felt that talking about repatriation would lose us votes. Now Farage is openly talking about deporting, in his words, “all illegal immigrants”. Well, that’s further to the Right than the BNP was when it won power in 2009. Well, it won two MEPs. It didn’t win power. Won two MEPs. That tells you something that I think is very important, that these people can be brought in our way and as a pressure group on their fringes.

 

Because, look, there are people in Reform who watch these shows. There are people in Reform that used to share my tweets. There are people in Reform that listen to Morgoth, follow Keith Woods, know about the JQ. And there was all that hullabaloo before the election that a number of people in Reform were all openly saying:

 

“What was the point in going to war with Germany? It was a waste of time, didn’t benefit us. Load of crap!”

 

That is unprecedented in British politics to have a party with Parliamentary seats where the membership and the candidates are openly discussing things that we might discuss tonight because somebody sent us a Superchat.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, I completely agree. Like I said, I joined the Conservative Party in 97 to see if it was possible to take a party that had been crushed and move it to the Right. What I found was that actually at grassroots level, you didn’t really need to. They were actually pretty Right anyway. But the upper echelons of the Conservative Party had been there far too long. The beauty with Reform is that they haven’t. They haven’t and they haven’t got a stronghold on Parliament yet. They’re going to need more MP’s. I would rather those MP’s were our guys. I would rather the people running their think tanks were our guys. I would rather the people that running the business clubs and the forums and the Reform associations were our guys. Okay? And you don’t have to go there and cuck. You’ll find that 90% of the people you talk to in Reform are the same as us. Okay?

 

Like you said, they would retweet you and they would watch Morgoth, and the talking points would be the same. It’s only at that top level that they’ve toned it down. And I know Farage is not our guy, and I know Tice definitely isn’t our guy! But they’re going to need more people. And if the people they need are us, then again, it’s ludicrous not to take that opportunity.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And look, I’m not saying this is the route for most people. I’m saying this is the route for people who absolutely want to don that suit, shirt and tie and knock on doors every night for the next four years to pave the way for an electoral victory.

 

Now, I know who Jez 9999 is, and I’m telling you now, no offence, mate, but you are absolutely not putting on a suit, shirt and tie and knocking on doors every night of the week for the next four or five years!

 

So this wouldn’t even apply to you. [chuckling] This applies to a specific type of young guys, probably in his mid twenties, like I was when I did that. He’s got all the energy in the world and genuinely believes in that kind of change. As a 43 year old guy with what is effectively a wife, absolutely a young daughter, and all the sort of problems and trials and tribulations that brings. I don’t have the time to be knocking on doors, you know, four or five nights of the week like I used to when I was a much younger man. But there are young revolutionary minded men who might do that.

 

Anyway, Merry Englander gave her $5. Thank you much. He said “donation”. Thank you my friend. John Skywalker gave $6 and he said:

 

“Watched your film review of Munich. As for why the lead character by Eric Banner questions his actions, I think Spielberg made him sympathetic to appeal to gentiles in the audience and any hesitation they may have fighting the War on Terror. Ultimately, I think pro-zionist Spielberg was to say, do what must be done. This can be seen in the final shot of the Twin Towers and the text, ‘nine of the eleven terrorists were killed’. Selling gentiles on their methods is also done in their book Rise and Kill Them First. I recommend reading it if you haven’t done so already. Really gives you their mindset.”

 

Well, I haven’t read that book and thank you so much for the Superchat.

 

Also, I was cheekily while Woodlander was talking, re-watching the end of the film then, because I actually didn’t notice that usually I noticed little things like that, but I didn’t notice that at the end of Munich they had the Twin Towers and 9/11 up on the screen. I mean, that that is just absolute sort of mental games at their finest!

 

Woodlander, have you seen Munich? Did you enjoy it?

 

[125:54]

 

The Woodlander: I haven’t seen it, no. It’s on my watch list. I don’t watch a lot of telly, don’t watch a lot of films, to be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I hated the film, so you’re not missing much. It was horrible and there were certain scenes in it that actually made me feel quite sick. I didn’t enjoy it.

 

Glen19, gave $5. No, he gave $6. No, he gave $9 over multiple Superchats.

 

So I’m going to read them all together as one. Thank you so much, he said:

 

“Sad to say, Mr Collett, I don’t think anything political was gained from the riots, but it appears that they will copy what happened in the US with January the 6th people. Arrest and jail those involved, whether actively or passively. What do you think?

 

“I don’t think waiting for a race war to break out after demographics becomes worse will happen. Many will do what persecuted populations do in the past have done and emigrate. If nothing changes in the West, there’ll be mass emigration. Even those that go to the third world. Many falsely believe it’s impossible to take up residency and employment in foreign countries because there is a global conspiracy against White people.”

“As someone who worked and lived in different countries in Asia, I can say this is very false. When I was assigned to work in India by my employer, there were White South Africans in the gated community I lived in that play professional sports on Indian teams, ‘gori’, term for loose White women dancers for the film industry there and others. The Japanese media is largely not available in English, but they use western immigrants as examples on the media of the slowly changing Japan. Just like in this article.”

 

You can read the article there in the Superchat. I’ll answer this bit by bit, then I’ll throw it over to Woodlander.

 

Firstly, I think you’re absolutely correct! These riots have become the British January 6th. And that’s a very, very astute observation. I don’t think anything political was gained from them. I warned people not to go and get involved. I said this would happen and I said:

 

“Look, stay out of any trouble, you know, organise yourself in a peaceful manner.”

 

Now, I also think people who, when the writing broke out, started to talk about a race war were idiots. There isn’t going to be a race war. It’s much more likely that these kind of events will increase. And rather than a race war, we will end up in a Northern Ireland style situation where you have segregated communities, peace lines, and you end up in a situation where there are White British areas, there are Muslim areas, there are black areas, and there will be some mixing because there has been some interbreeding, but largely you will see sort of sectarianism, but on racial grounds.

 

And people who constantly fantasize about a race war. There has been no race war in South Africa. And that is far more brutal and far further down the road than we are here. I think we’re more likely to see sectarianism.

 

Now, the issue about emigrating, it’s something we’ve discussed tonight. I believe emigration will be something that is increasingly on the table for normal White Brits and it’s already happening.

 

So when they tell you that 1.5 million people, 90% plus of those are non-White, came to Britain last year, but net migration was about 800,000. The only reason net migration is 800,000 is not because 700,000 of those non-Whites went back. It’s because 700,000 White Britons went to live in Spain, Thailand, Vietnam, Serbia. Some will now be going to Russia, some will be going to Italy, some will be going to the south of France.

 

And this is why Farage’s Net Zero is not enough, because Farage’s Net Zero would basically legislate for a situation where 1.5 million non-White migrants arrived and 1.5 million White Brits left. And he’d call that a success! Well, that is not a success. That is replacement on steroids!

 

And we need to be mindful of this emigration because I know numerous people that I have met that I have shaken hands with that. Some of them I call good friends who are now living specifically in the Far East. That seems to be a real destination. Look at James Goddard. James Goddard at the moment is doing great shows. He’s got some great social media posts. He’s more politically active in terms of content creation than he’s ever been. And he’s doing it all from Thailand.

 

I don’t know if you want to comment on any of that Woodlander. Obviously, we’ve touched on stuff like this tonight, but over to you.

 

The Woodlander: With the emigration thing, it’s not for me. What I might do is look at a property abroad, but I’m not planning on moving full-time myself. I can completely understand the draw, especially with what’s going on in this country. The riots. No, they didn’t do anything political. I think they were allowed to happen as well. I think that the system has designed a society where an atrocity like that was going to happen at some point in time. They knew there would be a response, only this time they didn’t go all out to try and stop it! They allowed it to happen, so that they could do what they’re doing now.

 

So it was kind of obvious what was going to happen. It was local people. It wasn’t a “far-Right” organised thing. These protests weren’t organised. It was local people in different areas that were just sick and tired of what’s happening. And sadly, the government was waiting for that, and it fanned the flames.

 

And now it’s got its enemy. Now it can point and say:

 

“You are the enemy!”

 

And that’s all we’ve heard is about the “hideous far-Right”. They’re not far-Right. These are just local British people that are sick to the back teeth! And they’re ending up in prison. It’s a sad state of affairs. So no, riots didn’t do anything.

 

[1:32:35]

 

Mark Collett: And look, I’m going to go further than Woodlander here, and this might be unpopular, but strap yourself in for a hot take!

 

Not only didn’t the riots do anything, I believe that the government, Starmer himself, and the police, dealt with it in such a hamfisted way, they stoked tensions, angered people and more people came out. If Starmer had come out and attempted to reason with people, calmed them, talked about their totally justifiable fears about mass immigration, talk about the fact that Britain’s southern border does need to be policed. He could have even talked about it from a Left-wing perspective, like:

 

“We need to clamp down on people smuggling. There’s multiple victims in all this. But I understand your concerns.”

 

Most of those riots would not have been as bad, if they’d have even turned into riots at all! He stoked that. And he spoke to people in a way that was going to get that response. He then let those riots continue for several days. And when they’d been enough, there was then a choreograph, astroturfed and well funded response that will have cost tens, if not hundreds of thousands of anti-racist demonstrations paid for by the unions, choreographed everyone with the same signs, with all the same slogans on.

 

You know, those things are expensive. If you’re buying, you know, sort of 30 or so Corex boards all printed up, you probably get them for about five quid each at a decent size. Then you’ve got the wood to go on the back of them and all the rest, you’ve got somebody making them. There will have been somewhere, a production line producing those things are probably, you know, somewhere like 8, 9, 10 quid a piece, thousands of them being produced, shipped out all over the country by couriers or even by by same day couriers. Or even by union vehicles. All of that was choreographed.

 

So, number one, you have the prime minister laying down the law.

 

Number two, you have people baited into the trap.

 

And number three, you have the media rejoicing when the anti-racists come out en masse and put a stop to the evil far-Right:

 

“And because there were so many anti-racists, that’s the mood of the nation. So the only thing we can do is go along with the mood of the people now and punish the far-Right!”

 

To me, a lot of this looked like it was presented as some kind of theatrical event or even a pantomime. I don’t know if you’ve got anything to add to that, mate.

 

The Woodlander: No, I agree. I think, I said right at the beginning, this was done by a playbook. They were waiting for the response. It could have been in six months time that this atrocity had happened. They wanted that response by the British people so that they can do exactly what they’re doing now! So they can bring in legislation, so that they can start putting people in prison and set precedents for the reasons.

 

And it’s going to make things very much more difficult for us moving forward. You’re gonna have to watch what you say online. You’re gonna have to watch what you say in real life. Yeah. They wanted this to happen and they were just waiting for an excuse. It just so happened that it happened really early into his premiership.

 

But I think everything they’re doing was already done. It was already written down. They knew how they were gonna do it. The police knew how they were gonna handle it. It may look ham fisted. I think it was done on purpose. I honestly do! I think they handled the thing badly on purpose.

 

Mark Collett: I completely concur.

 

So we’ll move on from there. Dsallen7 gave $15. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“The UK government took a break from locking up their own citizens for standing in the wrong place to arrest journalist Richard Medhurst under terrorism charges for being critical of Israel. Two sides of the same coin.”

 

Well, that’s the other thing. Richard Medhurst is not a journalist. And you might be saying, what:

 

“Do you mean, Mark? He’s not a journalist?”

 

A journalist is now officially someone who gets a special little card from the state and is a member of the club. So if Richard Medhurst had been a card carrying journalist, he could not have been arrested for the things that he was arrested for. He was arrested because he is not a card carrying journalist. He’s an independent truth seeker. And independent truth seekers are now being rebranded as “misinformation agents”. That’s the problem!

 

And I know. Look, I know somebody might clip that out of context to make out like I’m insulting him. I’m absolutely not insulting Richard Medhurst.

 

I think what’s happened to him is absolutely scandalous! But what I’m saying is that is the way they do it.

 

[1:37:43]

 

The Woodlander: Exactly that again. I said it right at the beginning. What they’re doing is they’re saying:

 

“We’re the government. We tell you the truth! Anything else is misinformation.”

 

And now they’ve gone one step further and said:

 

“By the way, misinformation is a criminal act. So we will arrest you!”

 

Yeah, it’s not looking good! I think we should look into how you get press credentials. It’s not that difficult. If you’ve got a publication, you can apply for them. So, yeah, I’ll look into that. Because, I mean, I was accredited. I had press credentials before, I ran a magazine. I used to go to the motor show free of charge, go to press days, bike shows and whatever.

 

But you’re right, you do need to be accredited. We should look into it.

 

Mark Collett: I was just looking at Richard Medhurst there. He apparently isn’t allowed to say exactly what’s happening to him either, which is another scandal. Imagine being dragged away by the police, you know, locked in a cell, interrogated for 24 hours, then released with some kind of gagging order.

 

So you can’t even explain to people what happened to you. That is something that you’d hear about in the Soviet Union. They’d talk about that in North Korea, wouldn’t they? They’d say:

 

“Oh, a guy was arrested in North Korea. They dragged him away from his family. They returned him 48 hours later in clothes made of paper because they’d taken all his clothes away. All his personal items were seized, and he wasn’t even allowed to tell his family what he’d been arrested for. Oh, my God! The things that happen in North Korea!”

 

And you’re like:

 

“No, that’s what happened in Britain. The guy’s name is Richard Medhurst.”

 

It’s an absolute scandal! I’ve just followed him on. Well, an account that looks like it might belong to me. Just followed him on Twitter. [chuckling] ThinRedLine, gave $14. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“I think the system is making a mistake with these tyrannical laws. It will only wake more people up.”

 

I’ll throw that one over to you, Woodlander. Is this going to wake people up or is this going to scare people?

 

The Woodlander: Both! It will wake people up, but not enough. Really not enough. Again, I think a lot of what we’re seeing now was already game-played four years ago.

 

And if you want to see how the mass of the public react, right, we saw it then, we saw it then. The government said:

 

“This is the truth! Everything else is misinformation. Don’t worry about your lying eyes and seeing that there are no people dropping down dead in the street. We’re telling you this is the truth and we want you to basically attack anybody that isn’t toeing the line.”

 

And the public did. The public did! They shouted at you for not wearing a mask, they pointed fingers at you, right? They were the ones grassing you up for going for a walk. The general public went and toed the line. And sadly, as much as these new laws will wake a lot of people up, it won’t wake enough up.

 

Mark Collett: Do the worst thing about it? I remember covering this at the time and this was something that I was sort of like. I was just amazed when it happened. There were some complete arse who reported their neighbour to the police for not coming out and clapping for the NHS.

 

Now, at that point you are literally living in a Soviet style stage. And you can imagine it now, people looking up and down the road like panicking, like:

 

“Oh God, what if I’m the one that stops clapping first? You know? What if I’m the one that is the first to go back into my house when the clapping ends?”

 

And that’s how it became. And I remember, I never took part in all that crap, but it did affect people. And all these things are carefully choreographed attempts to mentally condition people into a response and into thinking, “are you a good guy?” A good guy means that you’re a conformist. Are you a bad guy? Bad guy equals freethinker. Simple as that.

 

NightNationReview gave $14. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“That is 100% what they are doing. They are criminalizing the dissent of the British people with nebulous terms. It’s horrifying to watch from America. The international overlords ultimately want the same for us too. Evil occupations!”

 

Well, I completely agree. Truthforge gave $11 thank you so much! And said:

 

“I support your efforts. Thank you for the content and the truth!”

 

Thank you so much! It’s very much appreciated. Anti-Mattoid gave $26 thank you so much! And said:

 

“Donation.”

 

Well, thank you for your kind donation. DerCheruska gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Good episode, good guest.”

 

Well, thank you very much. ThinRedLine said:

 

“In my opinion, …”

 

Though we’ve already done that. We did that one out of order. Penelope Maynard gave a phenomenally generous $200!

 

“Thank you so much to dear Mark and Woodlander. A salient stream, no truer words. Many thanks for your wisdom. Best, Penelope. NB: Mark, shall I email you at mark@thefallofwesternman.com? Thanks.”

 

Yes, you absolutely should. And you’ve been very, very generous! If you live in the UK, I’d be more than willing to sort of have dinner with you or answer your questions personally or send you a gift or something for your generosity. So thank you so much! Milos M gave some Odysee tokens and he said:

 

“My opinion on this is I don’t approve of foreigners coming here because they have been backstabbed and betrayed by their own government. But I understand them. A man in search of an ideal woman, a couple moving over to escape woke social and economical woke totalitarianism. But that is not problem solving.”

 

Look, this is what I’m going to say. I’m not somebody who ever wants to leave this country. I’m not somebody that feels comfortable abroad. I sometimes like going abroad, and I’ve been to beautiful countries. I loved my last trip to Finland and the family I stayed with. I loved my trip to Latvia. That’s probably one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever been. Mexico was interesting, but quite scary. [chuckling] And generally, I have enjoyed seeing other parts of the world, and certain parts of those world, the world I have liked, but it’s never been my home and I would never want to be an exile.

 

[1:44:31]

 

But again, I cannot condemn a man who looks at his family and says:

 

“I’ve got a wife and three beautiful kids. There’s a little Italian village that still picks their own olives, makes their own wine, and they’re selling houses there for 5,000 pounds each. And we’re going to move there and we’re going to go to church every Sunday, and my daughters are going to go to the little Catholic school, and I can work remotely from there. And the amount of money I’ll have will give us a quality of life we’ve never had before. My wife will then be a stay at home mom, and we can afford to have, you know, another child.”

 

Can I really knock that man? No, I can’t! And I can’t knock that man because this country is so, it’s becoming so bad for people! And it’s not just so bad in terms of the migration, the anti-White laws, the anti-White violence. But it’s just general quality of life, you know, quality of life.

 

Now, look, I’m off, I am largely off the McDonald’s train now. I’ve been saying, I make my own burgers, I cook my own chips. The best thing to cook chips in, people say, is beef dripping. They’re wrong! If you mix 50% beef dripping with 50% lard and cook your chips in that, it’s even better. You get the best of both worlds! I’ve been trying it I am one of those freaks that weighs it all out and has done all these different things. So I am cooking my own food.

 

But the fact is, for normal people, going to McDonald’s is a treat at the weekend with the kids. A Happy Meal used to be 1.99, it’s now 3.50. You’re talking a 75% increase in price. Have wages gone up 75%? I remember when petrol was a pound a litre. It’s now one pound 40. That’s a 40% rise in petrol. And it’s across the board, gas, electric, computer components. You know, if you’re building a new computer now, cost a bloody earth. You know, everything is going up like that.

 

So when people look at their basket of goods and they’re just nipped out for bread, a bit of butter a bottle of orange juice and maybe a couple of cream buns for dessert, and they’re spending 12, 13 quid and they’re thinking:

 

“I remember them. That would have been 4.50!”

 

People are now thinking:

 

“Well, why wouldn’t I go to Thailand, where for 4.50, me and my wife can go out to a restaurant and both have a beautiful bowl of beef noodles!”

 

I’m not condoning it, because it wouldn’t be my home.

 

And that’s why I never want to leave here. I never want to not be on English soil unless it’s for a little holiday, but I can understand it. And I think a few years ago, I would have been a lot more negative about people.

 

In fact, I was a lot more negative about people leaving a few years ago. But I’m probably less negative now than I ever have been, because I understand it.

 

I mean, I know you don’t want to leave, Woodlander, but are you negative towards people leaving?

 

The Woodlander: No. It’s actually an interesting topic, though, because it’s one of those ones that gets thrown back at me, which is:

 

“Your mum and dad were immigrants over in Spain, and yet you don’t like immigrants over here!”

 

And to some extent they’re actually right. But there is a difference. The difference is, I don’t think we would have a problem in England if we had a French quarter, or an Italian area, or a German area. These cultures, these ethnicities, even the Polish to some extent. And I’ll be honest, when I first moved to the town I grew up in, there was a large Polish community. But you wouldn’t have known it because they had fully integrated. It was small, but they had fully integrated.

 

The Europeans have a similar ethnicity and a similar culture throughout. And it can work quite well. The Brits move over to Spain and within a few years, the town they’re living in is little England, right? An English bloke buys a pub, it does Sunday dinners, bloke buys a fish and chip shop, bloke opens an English bookshop. Within to long, it’s, … But the Spanish don’t really mind because the cultures are very similar. The English still go to the Spanish markets, they get on with their Spanish neighbours, everyone rubs along quite well.

 

Different matter when it’s the North Africans moving into Spain, the culture is completely different. There’s a lot of criminality. The Spanish don’t like it. So it’s the same over here. We haven’t got a problem with communities of Europeans. We’ve got a problem with communities of Africans, Asians, Middle Eastern, ethnicities. The cultures clash with us and the ethnicities clash with us.

 

So it’s an interesting topic, but I won’t rattle on all night about it.

 

[1:50:19]

 

Mark Collett: I’ll say this as well, woodland and this might make you smile. But I’ve never felt like I was going to be mugged or stabbed walking through Chinatown either! [chuckling]

 

The Woodlander: You laugh! I mean, the thing is, we’ve always had Chinese communities here. I remember going to London and my dad saying:

 

“Well this is Chinatown.”

 

And it was all full of Chinese and whatever, and it was you could walk around and it was fine, I understand, tucked round the back with some opium dens and whatever. But we didn’t really have a problem with these ethnicities. There were parts of Bedford, which were largely Italian. They had ice cream parlours and Italian restaurants and pizza places. This is going back in the sixties and seventies. There was never really any problem. Okay? So these ethnicities and these cultures actually rub along, okay? Which is telling, isn’t it? Because that’s not what happens now.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s the thing. And I’ll also say this, [chuckling] it is a specific problem with certain types of culture. Now I don’t want, you know, an entire city’s end to be Chinatown. I don’t want that. It was more of a throwaway comment. But the fact is certain cultures do present more problems than others.

 

RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you. Sid:

 

“Dear Mark, could you ask Woodlander how he defines a fascist chicken? Do they lay eggs with 1930s European symbols on them or does he have an alternative explanation?”

 

The Woodlander: Hi, Rory. How are you? I mean, that’s really because I was called out as being far-Right. And they actually went on to say, you know, he talks about homesteading and raising chickens. How is talking about homesteading and raising chickens far-Right? They never define this thing. They just use it as a label. You know, I have a battalion of fascist chickens, apparently!

 

Mark Collett: I like the idea of that. AlbionForever gave an update on Richard Medhurst and he says:

 

“As soon as he stepped off the plane at Heathrow, he was arrested. It was clearly premeditated sting operation.”

 

Indeed. Jewy von Swindlestein gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great stream, guys. Keep it the good work. I’m convinced this collectivizing idea will work. I can think of another (((group))) that have done this for a very long time with huge success.”

 

Thank you. [chuckling] British Camp, [chuckling] gave $25. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“British people don’t go to Spain on a dinghy and expect to be given a house for free. Great show tonight!”

 

Well, I agree, but also when Brits do go to places, they generally don’t start stabbing people or robbing them off the back of mopeds or snatching mobile phones. We’re not people that go to places and groom the local children!

 

When people talk about Brits in Spain, it’s a false equivalence. You know, you don’t get Africans arriving in Britain with millions of pounds in the bank, buying property and doing up a local building, turning it into an African pub and selling food to other Africans. It’s not like that! They come here, they usually jump the social housing queue. They arrive in dinghy’s.

 

This idea that Brits going to Spain or Brits buying a property in Serbia is some way equivalent [chuckling] to dinghies full of people arriving on the southern coast is just absolute nonsense!

 

I don’t know if you want to add to that because I’m sure your parents didn’t arrive in Spain and jumped straight on the welfare system, did they?

 

The Woodlander: No, but it was interesting for me to look at that. And I spoke about this on Tasob, actually, which was that what happens is cultures replicate themselves.

 

So when the English get to Spain, they look around and they go:

 

“This is great, but we’d like a chip shop.”

 

So they open a chip shop. The Spanish haven’t got a problem with this. And nor would we have a problem when the Spanish come here and they say:

 

“We’re going to up a little tapas bar.”

 

That’s not an issue. Okay. I know it’s not all about food. But the cultures get on! They rub together perfectly and that’s what matters.

 

And it was interesting to see that the North Africans coming into Spain were not treated like the British. And it was because of the way they acted and those cultures didn’t get on.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed. Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you, my dear. And she says:

 

“Have a great week!”

 

Thank you very much. It’s Okay to be a Nationalist gave 14.88. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Anyone who wants a lovely white pill should watch the Woodlanders latest video. Great work, Mark and Simon, thank you for everything you do.”

 

Well, thank you so much! VM gave $5. Thank you very much. And he said something similar. He said:

 

“The eagle has landed. Enjoyed Woodlanders latest video. Mark, what are your thoughts on setting up a legal White advocacy division of PA or via something with Robin Tilbrook’s team? Could be something we need. Keep up the great work!”

 

People keep asking this. We’ve already got this. We’ve got the Workers of England, Union. I work with them at least once a month, either by pushing somebody in their direction or by actually working on these cases with them. So often when somebody who is a nationalist contacts me and says:

 

“Look, I’ve got a problem, I’m in trouble at work. What should I do?”

 

My immediate response is:

 

“Are you a member of the Workers of England, Union?”

 

Usually they say no. I say:

 

“Join them immediately!”

 

The next thing I say is:

 

“Send me all the information about the trouble you’re going through.”

 

And I sometimes spend hours going through these cases with people. There’s these people online that say:

 

“What does Mark do all day? He sits playing Mario Kart for 8 hours, then streams for 2 hours!”

 

Like, I wish I spent 8 hours a day gaming! I’m up at six every morning answering my emails or working on something which prevents me answering my emails, like scripting a video.

 

[1:56:48]

 

And once I’ve done that, I’m usually tied up on the phone. I can sometimes spend 4 hours in some days, like half my working day on the phone. And recently I’ve spent hours at a time working through debating techniques with several people who have been in employment tribunals. It’s something we already do.

 

If you’ve been watching my social media posts, who came on a stream with myself and Laura to tell people how to deal with the police? It was Robin Tilbrook. We actually have a book, or a booklet called, Don’t Say a Thing, A Practical Guide to Dealing with the Police. That was written by myself and Robin Tilbrook, a practicing legal professional. We already have legal advocacy with an organisation that’s very close to PA, that we work hand in hand with i’ll tell you this now. The first ever case in this country of somebody taking an employer to court for sacking them for refusing to wear a mask was a lady called Laura who was working for, I think it was Volkswagen. She was sacked for refusing to wear the mask. She rang me on a Sunday evening, because I’ve known her for years. She’s been a friend of mine for years. She rang me on a Sunday evening all flustered!:

 

“Mark, what am I going to do? I’ve got the first stage of my employment tribunal in the morning. I haven’t prepared. I don’t know what I’m doing. I’ve not got anyone representing me.”

 

I put her in touch with Robin Tilbrook. He took the call that evening, the Monday morning before a tribunal. He briefed her on what to say. She went into the tribunal. It was postponed until she got advocacy. They won that case. It was a landmark case. That was PA, Robin Tilbrook of the English Democrats and the Workers of England, Union all working together to help somebody. We’ve been doing this for years.

 

PA went slightly adrift when an absolute wrongun in our midst tried to force all this, “elections or nothing”, upon us. That wasn’t anything I wanted. And you look back at the earliest streams, community building and White advocacy, that is what we are now. No one’s coming in and pushing us in a different direction. I should have stuck to my guns and done that’s what I spend my days doing. That’s what I’m most passionate about. That’s what we can win on. And we should keep doing that. And we’ve already had massive victories.

 

You know, people say:

 

“What have PA achieved?”

 

Well, we’ve had numerous asylum seeker centres shut down, numerous Drag Queen Story Hour events stopped. We’ve helped numerous people who were going to lose their jobs. We’ve set legal precedents and we’re going to keep doing that. And we’re going to keep working with Woodlander. We’re going to keep working with Workers of England, Union. We’re going to keep working with independents who are fighting for things at local level. We’re going to keep doing the food banks. We’re going to keep doing the litter picks. All these things are things that we can do and make real change.

 

Anyway, last Superchat is ScaredyCat, $4. Thank you so much, my dear. And she says:

 

“Hi, Woodlander and Mark, best wishes.”

 

And that brings us to the end of the show. Woodlander, my friend, you have the final word because you’ve been an amazing guest as always.