Tim Murdoch: This is Tim Murdoch. You’re watching WhiteRabbitRadio live in Game Exotica, the interview series. We have on Blair Cottrell. He will be on hopefully for almost a whole show, but most likely only half a show because he’s on a phone and all these, I guess we can say foreign run convenience stores don’t have the right cord for him.

 

So his phones might run out of charge on us and probably will. So get your questions in. We’re here to talk about Joel Davis and things going on over in Australia. Joel can’t be on because of his crazy bail.

 

So how you doing, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m doing fine, man! It’s nice and early here. Not that early. What is it, like 8 o’ clock in the morning? But rolled out of bed, frantically searched for the local convenience stores with friendly local neighborhood Indians. Trying to find the Right charger cord. And I bought one not to let you guys down, but then it’s the wrong one. So we’re just gonna have to see how long this lasts.

 

But the reason I’m in a hotel is because a friend and I traveled from Melbourne to Sydney last night. It’s like a nine hour drive. Australia is a big country like America, but when you factor in the couple of stops to get fuel, it ends up being like 10 or 11 hours. And we did that to visit Joel. First time I’ve seen Joel since he’s been released from prison. Been released on bail about a week ago, just less than a week ago.

 

He’s got stacked of new charges on him. He was initially. If you guys don’t know the story, Joel’s someone I stream with down here. Joel Davis, political commentator and streamer from Australia. He was charged with offending a politician [Allegra Spender], harassing or offending a politician in a Telegram post for a comment he made in a Telegram post that was posted to his public channel. And he was held in isolation as a “national security threat” for the last four months. He was finally released on bail by a Supreme Court justice, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. But he had to pay a lot of money to get there. I think he raised maybe 40,000 from his supporters to get to that point to be released on bail from the Supreme Court. But I think he’s like down to his last 4,000 now.

 

So that’s how much it’s cost him just to get bail for a relatively not less than serious charge. It’s not really a serious charge. It typically carries a pretty low imprisonment rate. I think 6.5% of people that get charged with the same offense that Joel’s been charged with actually end up going to jail at all! So almost 95% of people that get charged with this don’t even go to jail at all! Joel hasn’t even been found guilty yet. He’s not even been convicted. He’s just been accused! But he was held in prison because he’s considered a “national security threat” due to his ideology and various opinions that he shares while he’s streaming.

 

So I had dinner with him last night, and he hasn’t changed at all! If anything, he’s, like, sharper and clearer and even more intelligent than he was before. It’s not surprising because when you sit in jail for a while, you’re removed from all of the petty distractions and the quote, unquote, “degeneracy” of normal society, and all you can really do is read and write. And when you do that for four months straight, you come out quite sharp and clear.

 

So, yeah, he’s in great spirits. He’s very happy to be home. Very grateful to everyone who supported him. He is. Everybody who made it possible for him to get bail, who pitched into the fundraiser. That was huge! But yeah, we had a good laugh. We had some food. He’s feeling good. So that’s where he’s at right now!

 

But he’s banned from the Internet.

 

The reason I have to speak for him, I guess, or update you guys, is Joel is banned from the Internet! Okay? He can’t even have a smartphone, guys. The judge has ruled that he has to have an old brick phone that can’t access the Internet. He’s allowed to access the Internet by computer, but he can’t post anything to social media. He can’t comment on anything, and he can’t have access to the Internet from his phone. Those are his bail conditions imposed by the Supreme Court Justice.

 

Tim Murdoch: Can we petition? Can I pay a lawyer to petition to get him on WhiteRabbitRadio? I wonder how funny that would be. How would that go?

 

Blair Cottrell: I doubt it.

 

Tim Murdoch: I think they’d probably throw him back in jail or something, right? Try to throw me in jail, maybe.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Tim Murdoch: But anyways. I think that’s kind of funny, though. Well, it’s funny that they’re going to that extreme, but they’re just trying to make an example out of him, and they did. Is there any precedents for trying to keep him off the Internet or denying his civil, … This is denying his Civil Liberties in a modern, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t really have., …

 

Tim Murdoch: Denying him the public square. I mean, he can’t come on a radio show and talk about his case. He can’t have a smartphone and post to his Telegram. Even if he’s not violating, … Telegram is not illegal in Australia. It’s not illegal for him to post on Telegram. It’s just illegal for him to say certain things which they’re constantly trying not to specifically define.

 

[07:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: There is some precedent. Look, this demonstrates the bail conditions imposed on Joel basically being banned from the Internet because the accusation against him stems from a post made on the Internet.

 

And so while the matter is still active and a conviction is yet to be found bail conditions preventing him from using the Internet. This kind of thing demonstrates the disparity between Australia and America. We don’t have Civil Liberties. We don’t have free speech rights down here. Like, so no one has the rights to be criticizing any government official, really. As long as you’re not being overly belligerent. You might be able to, but depending on the language you used, you can be charged with menacing or harassing or maybe something else. It’s getting quite tight down here, especially in recent years. But there’s been a significant shift in the past six months or so.

 

I mean, last year, after our most significant or our worst terror attack in the country’s history occurred on Bondi beach in New South Wales, a couple of Muslim characters opened fire on people on a beach specifically targeting jewish people. I think it was at a jewish festival of some sort. It’s like certain government bureaucrats were so disappointed that the shooters weren’t White guys that they just unleashed on Joel Davis! It’s like the Eye of Sauron was just completely focused on Joel Davis. And Joel’s, like, really surprised by it. When we were eating dinner last night, he was laughing! He’s like:

 

“How is this real? Like, I just posted one thing to Telegram and I’m being treated worse than the actual terrorist who shot those guys on the beach. I’ve been banned from the Internet!”

 

He’s almost struggling. He’s laughing at it, but he’s almost struggling to wrap his head around the logistics of it. And it doesn’t actually make sense.

 

So there is some precedent for people being restricted from using the Internet in a certain way if their accusation relates to something on the Internet in Australia. But the major point to consider is its very different from America. Here, basically, you can be just held indefinitely while your matter is being argued without any proof of guilt. You’re essentially guilty until you try to pay enough to prove yourself innocent. You know, so the whole concept of “innocent until proven guilty”, it exists in legal theory, but in practice it doesn’t exist because you get accused of something and then you sit in jail until the matter is finalized in court, until you pay enough money to prove your innocence, or do a deal and get out somehow.

 

So that’s how it really works.

 

Tim Murdoch: He can talk with his friends, he can talk with you and go to dinner with you. Not a problem. What he’s restricted from like former NSN because that’s been disbanded. For instance, if Tom comes and sees him, can he see Tom?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m pretty sure he can, but the thing is, Tom has also been charged with a number of offenses which confine him to his state. And Joel resides in a different state right now, the neighboring state.

 

So you can’t cross state boundaries legally while you’re on bail for these offenses. And Joel can’t leave the state either.

 

Tim Murdoch: They basically have to have their cases done with, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. Yeah. So they can move through states freely again. And that’s very standard for any sort of indictable criminal offense for which you’re on bail. You’re not supposed to leave the state without permission. So technically they could call the police and say:

 

“Look, I want to go interstate to visit my friend and come straight back. Can I do that?”

 

But it just comes down to the whim of some police bureaucrat whether or not you can actually do that.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah. Not a free country! But none of us live in a free country. Just some more than others at the moment, maybe. When does this, how long. What is the next step for him? How long will this take before he can get to court? Because now he’s released on bail. But the matters are still pending. These guys have all kinds of matters pending, technically, I guess.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. While Joel was in what’s called Long Bay Jail, New South Wales, in isolation, being held without conviction as a national security risk, he was hit with something like nine other charges, or more than that.

 

I can’t remember what he said. There’s a whole bunch of other charges.

 

Tim Murdoch: Are they more or less serious charges? I remember this, but when it comes to these Australia charges these charges are serious, but they’re not doing it. I mean, these guys really aren’t doing anything! They’re just hitting crazy charges over Telegram posts or crazy charges for getting into an argument with the shitlibs or it’s just total insanity!

 

But nonetheless, the charges are there and the charges are very serious on the books. And the police treat them like these are major criminal offenses and terrorists and so on and so forth.

 

Blair Cottrell: Typically, for this kind of thing, the police wouldn’t usually get out of bed for something like what Joel posted on Telegram, it’s just because of his ideology. And that was more or less admitted by the court system in the magistrates level of court, which is a lower level of a state court in Australia. Magistrates were just like:

 

“Look, usually bail would apply, but because of his ideological connections and the sensitivity around that, given this recent terror attack, he needs to be held in prison.”

 

Basically. That’s what they were essentially saying.

 

But look, all of the charges that Joel has, I think there’s beyond nine of them right now! Nine or ten or maybe even more. They’re all in relation to streaming. Okay. They’re from things. I think he has six charges from one stream! From the things he said about other ethnic groups.

 

[13:05]

 

Tim Murdoch: These are streams with you? These are streams with Americans or you don’t know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Stream with me. Yeah, well, it was just a stream out of Australia with me. The one in question. The’s being charged with a number of offenses relating to “inciting contempt or revulsion of a specific class of people”, which is relatively new legislation under Australia’s Racial and Religious Tolerance Act.

 

Tim Murdoch: This is saying something about jews, probably.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, one I think is comments about jewish people. One is about Indian people and the other is about black people.

 

And all of the comments, there’s like six different charges I think, if my memory serves me right. But I know he’s definitely been charged a bunch of times in relation to one stream. And here’s the thing man, and this is what’s super interesting.

 

You probably heard Nick Fuentes have a crack at Joel and say:

 

“He’s just a Wignat. This was always going to happen to this guy. What an idiot! Whatever.”

 

But Joel has been charged for essentially being a groiper and streaming, like doing exactly what Nick Fuentes does.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, but he’s in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s been charged for what he’s saying in streams, and then directing his followers to criticize politicians on X. He’s been charged with doing the same thing. Americans have the freedom to do this apparently, but we don’t.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, Nick actually said something that over his sentencing after the fact. But nonetheless, he can be on all sides of the ball, depending on who’s on his nerves on any given day.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think Nick’s great value. When he initially, his comments were:

 

“Oh, this was always going to happen to Joel!”

 

But I think when you look at the charges, …

 

Tim Murdoch: Liek:

 

“The charge this is bullshit!”

 

Or something. I forget what he said.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s bullshit when you look at the charges. Initially, you’re like:

 

“Okay, Joel was pretty loose!”

 

Everyone can agree that Joel was pretty loose. He was going pretty hard.

 

When you look at what he’s actually being charged with doing. What he’s actually being charged for doing is basically the same thing that Nick does for a living. And you’re like:

 

“What? Hang on, it doesn’t., …”

 

Like I said, it demonstrates the difference legally between Australia and America, and it demonstrates how important it is to have legislation, constitutional rights to freedom of speech, because this is what happens when you don’t have that.

 

Tim Murdoch: Fascinating. So how long will this take before all this particular case is over with and all these other cases. What’s the lineup like?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d imagine he’s got 12 to 18 months of court appearances, but his next move will be to, at his own convenience, try to get all of the charges heard in bulk in one or two matters, so he doesn’t have to go to court for every single different offense.

 

Tim Murdoch: It’s all the same.

 

Blair Cottrell: Otherwise. It’s just too, …

 

Tim Murdoch: Him running his mouth. It’s all the same stuff. Him live streaming and talking.

 

Blair Cottrell: And there’s the Telegram post, which is a different category of offending, but similar still. And there’s a bunch of other offenses in relation to other things he said. He’s even being charged in relation to private messages he’s had. Because when the police. This is what I forgot to mention. When the police arrested him, the Federal Police, they took his phone, they went through everything, and he’s been making jokes with friends in private conversations that he’s been charged for. Like, literal private conversations that were never public. Because he’s mentioned people specifically in some of those, like, comments, which was all in jest mostly because when you’re talking to the boys, you think it’s private. You say stuff. You say stuff that you don’t think other people would see. But the police have gone through all of it. And he’s got charges in relation to private DMs as well.

 

Tim Murdoch: That’s, its such bullshit! None of these politicians could hold up to those standards. And it’s absurd! But nonetheless, it’s something he’s going through. I remember his fundraiser. I remember putting up and his fundraiser was doing well. Does he have enough money for court? You guys have some good lawyers these days compared to like 10 years ago.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, 10 years ago I was relying on the sympathy, … When I was charged with “hate speech”, I was relying on the sympathy of one lawyer, one lawyer slash barrister, like performing two roles. And I paid him as much as I could, but it was never quite enough. These days there’s a lot more resources available, there’s a lot more sympathy internationally. And the lawyers that Joel has access to, the barrister he used at the Supreme Court, all very professional, top tier stuff. And having access to that for him right now is like indispensable!

 

Tim Murdoch: Plus, there was no such thing as, like GiveSendGo or anything like that, back in the day. There was no crypto.

 

Blair Cottrell: Shout out to GiveSendGo too, by the way. Like just standing strong in the face of all the pressure they must receive from governments around the world and saying:

 

“Look, we believe in free speech. If these people want to raise money, they’re not doing anything illegal. They can raise money.”

 

Like most platforms, most fundraiser platforms would not do that. So GiveSendGo, they’re top notch.

 

[18:26]

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, I haven’t checked out his fundraiser. I’m assuming it’s still going or I know he hit his goal. That’s all I remember.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think maybe he was saying to me last night that he’s nearly spent at all! Just to get bail.

 

Tim Murdoch: I would imagine.

 

Blair Cottrell: But, I don’t know the details of when he goes to court next and what’s going to be necessary. So once that is known, I’ll help get the information out there and we’ll see what we can do to keep helping him.

 

Tim Murdoch: Okay. And Tom as well. Right. And who else? I know that there’s other guys charged, correct?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, there’s a bunch of guys with a bunch of charges. I don’t even know how many. I think the point, obviously is you’re probably understanding Tim. I think the point is just to bog you down.

 

The point is like to just throw this hooked net, this hooked net of just legal nonsense over you that you get entangled in for years. You spend your energy on it, you spend your money on it. And that just kind of holds you back from activism, politics and what you really care about. And that’s the way the Australian government deals with its dissidents.

 

Tim Murdoch: The “process is the punishment”, as they say over here. That’s the whole entire deal. You might get off because it’s all bullshit, but you’re going to have to go through money and it’s all big pain in the ass.

 

Hopefully everyone comes out smarter and more clever. But nonetheless, it sounds like he’s in good spirits. And now this particular program where you can’t be on a smartphone or anything like that, that’ll continue until that particular or trial is over?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the intent generally, because he has 20 bail conditions, I think, that’s more bail conditions than I’ve ever heard anyone having! Even like the worst criminals don’t get that. I think that the Supreme Court Justice probably just wanted to demonstrate that she was taking everything seriously. She wasn’t just releasing him willy nilly. She wanted to demonstrate to the (((right people))) that she still considers him very threatening. Whatever.

 

Tim Murdoch: Why did he have to be released to his mother and not his wife and kid?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, this is the funny, this is a weird thing. He’s been banned from Bondi, where his partner lives. And that’s public knowledge now because the media, like doxed her ages ago and, …

 

Tim Murdoch: Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Literally took a photo on there. Yeah, she was coming out the front of her house. They literally was waiting for her, taking a photo, which I don’t know how that’s legal, is that stalking? The media seems to be able to do whatever they want here. So I don’t know.

 

Tim Murdoch: She’s being a public person now. But they do celebrities. Where there is no decorum, there is no decency in the societies we live in anymore.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a good way to put it. Right. And that’s how it feels, definitely!

 

But in Bondi, that’s where the terror attack happened against members of the jewish community. And because of Joel’s public statements considered anti-semitic and because there’s a considerable population of jewish people living in Bondi, that seems to be the reason he’s been banned from that whole suburb. He can’t go to that suburb!

 

Despite the fact that his partner and child live there. And that was his previous residence. That’s where he lived as well. He can’t go home. He’s not allowed to go there because jews live there!

 

Tim Murdoch: Can they come and see him? Can they come to his mother?

 

Blair Cottrell: They can visit him, but I think it’s like an hour’s drive or something, so there’s a bit of a distance to travel. But they have visited him regularly since he’s been out. He’s building a relationship with his son:

 

“My son seems to like me. He’s happy when I hold him.”

 

Is what Joel said:

 

“You know, my son likes me.”

 

So that’s good news. It was just good to see him last night Tim. He’s happy. He’s the same old Joel, but kind of sharper and more energetic than ever!

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, I know that when he first got in, it was really bad! Right. Did he have any stories from jail that he told you?

 

Blair Cottrell: So many! Too many to get into. It was really funny because even though he’s in isolation, he’s in isolation with other guys in other cells who can all talk to each other through the vents and the walls.

 

Tim Murdoch: Okay.

 

Blair Cottrell: And so, yeah, he met some very interesting characters. Very funny stories. Probably the funniest thing that I could share without stepping on any toes or upsetting anybody. I didn’t know this. I assumed that when Joel was arrested by the Federal Police in Australia, when he was arrested, he was arrested at a cafe while he was eating breakfast. And because it was just down the road from where his partner lives, I assumed that his partner was at the cafe with him.

 

But that wasn’t the case. He said to his girlfriend, who was due to give birth to their baby the next day, he said:

 

“Babe, I’m going to get breakfast. I’ll see you later!”

 

And he never came back! [chuckling] The day before his girlfriend was due. So she was probably sitting at home thinking:

 

“Has he ditched me? What the fuck?”

 

The timing of that [chuckling] was really ironic and funny. Like when he told the story.

 

[23:40]

 

Tim Murdoch: I remember him getting arrested. I didn’t know it was a restaurant. I didn’t know where it was at. I just remember seeing him getting arrested, the picture. I wonder what he was eating that morning?

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think even the cafe owner made a comment to the media, because the media rushed into the cafe, the breakfast cafe, and asked a bunch of questions and even asked:

 

“What was he eating?”

 

I think he was eating smashed avocado on toast. That was his last meal. That was his last meal! But look like credit where credit’s due. The police actually went, Joel said:

 

“Can you at least tell my girlfriend what’s happened? Because she’s going to think I just ran away!”

 

So [chuckling] the police actually went and knocked on the door and said:

 

“Yo, just so you know, we arrested your boyfriend. That’s why he’s not coming home.”

 

Tim Murdoch: It seemed like the media was there as he was arrested, which is kind of shady. They must have known about it or something. Or did they?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think so. I think the footage of him being arrested comes from police body cam footage. Okay, maybe. I think they all have cameras on their chests and these days it’s part of procedure to actually document high profile arrests and stuff like that. So I think that’s where that footage came from. And the media rushed there after the fact.

 

Tim Murdoch: Fascinating. Okay, did he have any words of advice? Is he full of advice and knowledge now?

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s definitely acknowledging that there’s a shift in what is going to be possible in Australian political discourse in the future. Okay, that’s probably the best advice. He hasn’t given any advice directly, but this is what I’m projecting to you guys as what I think is probably the best advice given the situation. Joel’s acknowledging pretty much openly that the stuff they were doing before, stuff him and the NSN were doing, the kind of activism they were doing, has essentially been made a “hate crime”. It’s illegal now to openly criticize the jewish community is basically illegal in Australia now. You can’t do that.

 

And so you need to approach discourse in a way that appreciates that new reality. And Joel’s acknowledging that, everyone’s acknowledging that’s why the NSN has disbanded, to prevent their members from going to jail for 10 years for being a member of a hate group.

 

So that chapter of the NSN, the way it was, is done. And a new chapter in Australian political discourse is opening. But what that’s going to look like isn’t clear yet because the laws that have been imposed are so extreme, no one’s sure what’s going to be allowed and what’s not. And it’s going to come down to the whim of political bureaucrats.

 

Tim Murdoch: Sounds like a bunch of bullshit, that’s for sure! Let me get to a Superchat because this one’s for you, actually:

 

“Happy to hear of Joel’s release.”

 

Thank you White Bitch Triple Six. What a handle she has, eh? See what we’ve got here. Okay, up here:

 

“Happy to hear of his release. Hope him and his family, …”

 

Let me get this right here:

 

“Hope him and his family are doing well despite these bogus charges. Wondering if Blair does one on one fitness consultations. I would pay for an hour of his fitness wisdom.”

 

Actually, I think you have something going down that particular line. You’re lining up websites and stuff like that and that’s something you do know about, but go ahead.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, thanks for asking. I do provide. That’s what I do to support myself. And I think I’m pretty good at it. I can basically solve your problems in that regard. And I try to offer a lot more than most people do and I’m very pretty passionate about that. You’ll have to DM me on either Telegram or Instagram at the moment because I’m still setting up a more convenient way for contact. And that’s nearly finished.

 

But if you’re keen to get onto it straight away, just send me a DM on Telegram. It’s at Blair Cottrell. Just my full name. Or you can find me through my main channel, which is at Real Blair Cottrell. And that’s what I do. I help people burn fat and build muscle. I’ve been doing it a while.

 

Tim Murdoch: You can also email me White Bitch Triple six, since I know who you are and I will put up his information because I have all of it. I’ll send it back to you in an email if you didn’t get any of that or you need to know how to get a hold of him. I’ll try to hook you two up.

 

But yeah, that’s what he does. But go ahead, finish.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s fine. I appreciate it, Tim. Cheers. That’s basically. There’s not a lot more to say.

 

But before the show started, you were asking me about Ben Roberts Smith, the veteran who was recently arrested. That’s a big deal in Australia too, guys! Like this is like a huge deal! This guy Ben Robert Smith, if you don’t know, he’s like a 6 foot 7 chad, Special Forces SAS, Australian army veteran who in Afghanistan was basically responsible for rescuing his colleagues, which he was very good at doing. He’s known for storming significant numbers of enemy troops on his own and somehow winning! This guy’s like basically being hailed as a war hero ever since the war in Afghanistan. There’s certain situations where Australian troops were betrayed by members of the local army or police who offered to kill them in exchange for doing a deal with the Taliban at the time. And they were pinned down by enemy fire, they were betrayed, they were murdered in their sleep. And Ben Robert Smith was the guy who hunted those guys down to save any colleagues that had been captured or pinned down.

 

[29:18]

 

Tim Murdoch: He was in some type of anti-terror squad?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think SAS is kind of like a Special Forces or like a more serious, … I don’t know exactly! Tom Sewell would be much better explaining.

 

Tim Murdoch: I can tell you what the problem was in Afghanistan is that there was a continuous issue on the rules of engagement, where someone could fire at you, throw a grenade at you, throw a bomb at you, or do something like that. Then they would make sure the village they were hiding in they would drop the gun, run back to the village. They would basically make sure that they were unarmed at all times because you couldn’t really do anything with an unarmed individual. It became like a police operation for a lot of different guys. But there was various different teams hunting these guys down. Yeah, playing these games. It was very nasty!

 

Blair Cottrell: It was. And that’s the thing. Basically the Australian army was in Afghanistan supposed to be hunting terrorists, terror networks, members of terror cell groups, but they basically had an arm tied behind their back and their feet bound at most cases. Like they couldn’t actually do their job properly because the rules of engagement kept changing. You just described it in a great way. They would like fire on Australian soldiers, then drop their rifles and act like they were just citizens.

 

Tim Murdoch: Well, this was a problem. This is a problem with my friends that were there from America. So no, this is what they were doing. They were feathering or floating the rules of engagement, terrorists were to make sure that:

 

“Well, they can’t kill me because I’m unarmed.”

 

When they just basically killed one of their friends, you know, an hour for something like that they were constantly playing these games where they became a policing operation. You have to go in and fingerprint them and try to prove the crime. It was a fucking mess, it wasn’t a war, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look the big drama is one of our war heroes from that time, from that era, from Afghanistan. The main one who became a bit of an icon was Ben Robert Smith. But there’s this huge, complex investigation that’s taken place behind the scenes, headed up by I think a combination of media and the Australian Federal Police, they’ve like sent people over to Afghanistan to try to get statements to use against their own soldiers. And the name Ben Robert Smith, that’s the one they kept targeting. There was a defamation case initially against media bureaucrats, specifically a journalist named Nick McKenzie who called Ben Robert Smith a war criminal without evidence. So Ben Robert Smith took him to court and said:

 

“That’s slander, I’m not a war criminal, I’ve got all these medals, what the hell?”

 

But the courts ruled in the favor of the media and they said:

 

“Well look, it could be true, so we don’t know the truth, so it’s not slander.”

 

So it’s like it basically just demonstrates that journalists can say whatever they want about anyone in Australia without any real basis. But now, a year or two after that finding, he’s actually been charged with five war crimes. With apparently either shooting people or commanding his comrades to shoot people who weren’t actually soldiers, weren’t Taliban or weren’t connected. That’s the accusation.

 

But this is the thing, guys, whether he’s guilty or not isn’t really what matters. What matters is the ripple effect that this has on our sense of national pride, the trust our soldiers have in each other and in our government and military, the willingness to actually join the military and go fight for the country. All of that gets pole-axed. That gets steamrolled now by the fact that they can’t even feel confident to go and kill their enemies to do what they’re trying to do without being thrown in jail for life for it when they come back. Because that’s a war crime! That’s the kind of feeling that this is created.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah. When I first heard it, I thought it was like ICC. I thought it was going to be a big international deal. Then I looked and I’m like:

 

“Holy shit, they’re bringing him up on charges inside of Australia!”

 

This is like some kind of shitlib ordeal, where they actually put up billboards and had advertisements over in Afghanistan for testimony and stuff like that you know, they’re like drumming stuff up!

 

It is somewhat unprecedented now, I assume, because a lot of these guys from my experience, aren’t necessarily on our side. In fact, the ones I know I would kind of consider assholes. [chuckling] You know, our societies are heavily degraded. These guys aren’t necessarily hugs and cupcakes or nice individuals. Many of them you could describe as Zogbots to a certain extent. “Rah, rah”, you know, patriots. But they would line us up against the wall as well if ordered by the government. What is his politics like? Is he being targeted for political reasons or is he targeted because he’s just a military icon and they’re trying to degrade a famous White military icon? You know what is the deal? Because he’s on their side.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like most soldiers he probably doesn’t have politics. And even if he does, it doesn’t matter! When you’re a soldier, you don’t have politics. You’re [government] property!

 

Tim Murdoch: Right, true.

 

[34:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: So that’s like the way I see it. Even if the charges aren’t political, they might as well be, as I explained just then, because they really have a dramatic negative impact on our sense of pride as Australians and our trust that our army members of the Australian Defence Force have in our government and each other. It just makes people not want to fight for this country and not want to take this government seriously.

 

Tim Murdoch: I didn’t mean to interrupt you, but in America that’s already happened long ago. So I’m taking it, this is like we’ve got upset veterans handing in medals. You guys have never had anything like this before where people are saying:

 

“You know, fuck this! I’m not fighting for this government!”

 

This is like the next stage from Covid Covid was a big trust hammer in Australia. This is another thing that’s really putting the nail in the coffin, so to speak?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like you said, there’s been really good articles put out there by Noticer News, which is huge source of news. Really good source of news in Australia. Probably the best source we have down here in Australia. And they just did a story I think yesterday or the day before, and war veterans all over the country are handing in their medals in disgust that the government has gone after this guy just for following orders, for being one of our best soldiers.

 

Tim Murdoch: It is years after the fact and you’re putting up advertisement. It’s years after the fact. It’s not like you’re dealing with fresh off Afghanistan and ICC charge or some type of formal investigation. Formal charge that this guy was doing really shitty things or unbecoming of an officer, so on, so forth, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! Why now? What’s the point of this?

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah. Years after the fact doesn’t make any sense.

 

Blair Cottrell: When something like this happens to him, like who benefits? What is Australia getting out of hunting or targeting its own soldiers? For, like, historical war crimes that probably didn’t even happen. And even if they did, where, … Let me ask you this question. Where’s the Taliban? The government there that’s still in place now. Where are they charging their soldiers with war crimes?

 

Tim Murdoch: They don’t give a fuck!

 

Blair Cottrell: Who are they investigating?

 

Tim Murdoch: They don’t have our standards. They don’t have our moral standards.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I’m saying, right? The Talibani government would never drag its own soldiers who did commit war crimes! There’s no doubt about it. It’s well documented. They’ll celebrate them as heroes! They’re doing the opposite. Right. So that just goes to show, …

 

Tim Murdoch: We’ve always had a very high standard for soldiers and soldier behavior. This is just years after the fact. This is Australia advertising they wanted to do this. And they’re doing it inside of Australia. And it all just doesn’t. I mean, hey, maybe he’s a piece of shit, Zogbot? Maybe he said, “kill all Nazis”. Whatever. I don’t know anything about the guy. But he’s being, you know, railroaded, giving the White nationalist treatment, as what I call it, really. And it’s all inside of Australia, and they’re kind of like, okay, you know, he killed a guy and drank out of his prosthetic or something like that. Well, why are they waiting so long if he’s doing all these terrible things?

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! It’s like, why now? Who benefits? What’s going on here? What’s the point? Is it really just bureaucratic procedure that took ages to roll around? And if that’s the case, it’s kind of female coded.

 

Because if you’re fighting a war and you’re holding yourself to certain standards of war crimes where you can’t actually even kill your enemies when they’re there, but your enemy’s not doing that, well, it’s no wonder we didn’t win that war. Right? But what was even the point?

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. But there’s this thing going on right now that’s the new head of the AFP. I think her name’s, [Krissy Barrett] I can’t remember her name. That’s that woman.

 

Tim Murdoch: It’s obviously political. This is the thing. We’re in a heavily degraded society, as I always say, and it affects everyone. And there is a problem of behavior amongst a percentage of Whites, especially in charge, especially in positions of power.

 

But there’s also a huge problem in this case of a White woman who obviously is targeting this guy, you know, would this be happening if it wasn’t for her? I don’t know. Seems like?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s this weird shift. There’s all these new task forces that are being created in Australia, specifically within the Australian Federal Police. There’s like, Task Force Against Anti-semitism, a task force to Promote Social Cohesion by targeting racism.

 

And all of that’s come about, Tim, in the last six to eight months. This is all really new stuff. So there’s these new like, it’s almost like the AFP was quietly overthrown. I mean, this is just speculation, but it was quietly overthrown.

 

And now it’s in the hands of someone. I don’t know, someone with hostile intentions. Because it’s like it’s being turned into a political police. And it happened very suddenly. It’s weird! I can’t explain it at this stage. All I know is that Australia is changing rapidly! It’s targeting its own citizens, its own veterans, its own people, to the benefit of (((foreign lobby groups))), foreign nations often and historically hostile to Australia.

 

[39:48]

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, I saw one particular piece from the Daily Mail and the quotes were, … You know, they were analyzing, these particular departments and whatnot were analyzing all his tattoos. And he has a Christian cross tattoo, or we’re calling a crusader tattoo.

 

Blair Cottrell: That was a patch. Yeah, he had a patch. This is Ben Roberts Smith, the soldier who’s been charged. There’s this famous photo of him which was allegedly taken immediately after he just charged in against superior numbers and rescued a bunch of his comrades under heavy fire.

 

And as he’s walking away from that battle, he has a crusader knight’s cross patch, like a red Christian cross on a White shield. But the media in Australia edits the Christian cross out of the photo before they publish it in order not to offend Muslims or offend anyone who might not like that.

 

I mean, that just goes to show where we’re at! If there’s that level of political censorship happening in media, then it’s not unreasonable to assume that he’s being targeted for political reasons. That’s why he’s been accused of war crimes.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah. They’re targeting Whites across the board, and he’s obviously a symbol and they’re going after him for that particular reason.

 

I mean, there might be something legitimate. I’m not going to say that the guy’s perfect. I don’t know anything about him. He might be evil. [chuckling] There are some badass veterans in the US Army that I wouldn’t want to live near, that’s for sure. So you never know! We don’t know anything about him. But what I think is shitty is that if he’s doing something and it’s that over the top and there’s all these charges, why are they waiting so long, and why are they doing it with inside of Australia, like they’re doing it?

 

So I don’t know. And putting advertisements, putting up advertisements?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s appeals to Afghanistanis, … There are more Afghanistanis living in Australia now, who have come from Afghanistan recently who have served in the army. Right. Because they have to over. There are more of them living here now than they, than the amount of Australian soldiers that were ever in Afghanistan.

 

So it’s like we have this fifth column and what the government’s doing and the police, they’re putting out advertisements appealing to those people in Australia saying:

 

“Hey, if you have any information about Ben Roberts Smith or any other soldier doing something mean or wrong to you, come and report it to us. And we’ll put it into our investigation.”

 

So it’s mind boggling! It’s like, how is this real? How is this happening?

 

Tim Murdoch: This is within the military, the confines of the military justice system of Australia. Correct? Or is it outside of the bounds of that? Because they have these laws on the books, war crime laws on the books and I don’t even know how old they are. Australia has these laws on the books that they can go after soldiers for war crimes regardless of the international law or anything like that it’s just kind of like internal to Australia. Now there’s always been a court martialing and stuff like that in America and behavior unbecoming of an officer and so on and so forth, et cetera. We have a military court of law here, but I don’t understand how it’s going over into civilian. I guess I don’t really know Australian courts.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s definitely an Australia internal thing, because it’s the Australian Federal Police that are leading the investigation. But they’re not really confined to the borders of Australia geographically. Like I said, they’ll send cops and investigators over to Afghanistan to get information from former Taliban fighters about Australian soldiers so they can go home and prosecute their own soldiers. I just think we need, regardless of this guy made some mistakes. I don’t care! This guy went to fight a war in another country against the enemy. That’s what he’s trained to do! And we need to stand with our own, even if they do make mistakes sometimes. It was easy to make mistakes in an environment where your enemy isn’t abiding by any specific rules of engagement. I’m not even saying he did make mistakes. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. The cops certainly weren’t there.

 

Tim Murdoch: Yeah, I’m not interested in trusting the advice of Afghanis that you’re soliciting, that are known liars, that they’re soliciting advice from. We have to see the evidence. But I just don’t like the way they’re doing this years after the fact. If he’s that much of a bad apple as they’re suggesting, you should have easily done something when he committed these acts because supposedly this is like known stuff and he’s a bad actor and he’s this big asshole and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay, fine. Why are you waiting so long? And why are they having to solicit anything? Shouldn’t you have collected evidence right then and court martialed him or whatever? That’s normally what happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! But look, guys, this is just what we’re going through down here in Australia.

 

I’m sorry to check out early, but my phone’s about to die. I’m just gonna give you guys the warning before it does. And like, look, we did kind of like a spontaneous drive up to visit Joel and have dinner with him last night. And so that’s why I’m like in disarray. I’d usually go sit with you guys for a bit longer. Yeah, thanks, Tim, for having me on. And thanks for the questions. Maybe in a couple of weeks or whenever you’re free again, we could say may, I could see up Tom Sewell. He could come on and he, Tom Sewell would be excellent at explaining the Ben Robert Smith Australian army situation because he spent a couple of years in battalion as a soldier. He has much more inside knowledge about how things really work.

 

[45:20]

 

Tim Murdoch: What blew me away is they’re doing this outside of the military, … Well, I don’t know how Australian military works, but they’re doing it, … I mean this is something that happened in a war, but they’re doing it outside military court of law, which I think is pretty crazy! But and they have their own little war crime, their own little war crime ordeal.

 

But anyways, I appreciate it, Blair, for coming on and being a good sport. Guys, I’m going to let’s see what I’m going to do here. Hang out here a couple minutes and look what’s going on in the chat. I thought he’d be on a couple hours obviously, but his phone ran out and what are you going to do when your phone runs out?

 

But this case is one to watch. It’s definitely a political trial. We’ll have to see what evidence there is and why they waited so long. It all stinks to me. But we do appreciate Blair coming on. His phone ran out and he had the wrong cord.

 

Let me see what you guys are saying here. Yeah, it sounds like Joel’s doing quite well. He’s doing okay. Bo Nilson, thank you very much for the sub. But I’ll stay around a couple minutes. Let me cruise around and see what’s going on and then I’ll let you guys go. And for the weekend I’ll be back on Sunday. Yeah, I’ll get those guys on again soon. I’ll get Tom Sewell on again. I have on Warren Balogh but I’ll try to get on Tom Sewell or I’m trying to think of who else. You know, Tom I think was in the military. So.

 

But anyways, I appreciate you guys tuning in and supporting the show. I will be back Sunday. I was planning on doing a two hour show with Blair but nonetheless these things do happen. We do appreciate him being a good sport and coming on for 45 minutes. I was hoping he’d make it on at least an hour but he got close. But I do appreciate it guys and I guess I’m going to go ahead and let you guys go. You guys have a wonderful Friday evening and Saturday and I’ll be back on Sunday same time, same place, about 5:30 PM. Need we’ll talk about everything going on. I know they’re meeting with, … Let’s go over to Drudge. What’s up? Crafty Booms. I know they’re meeting on, … Trump’s vowing complete decimation of Iran. They’re meeting with Iran tomorrow in Pakistan.

 

Okay, so get this. They’re meeting with Iran in Pakistan and Did Do Nothing Replay, bro:

 

“Catching live. Great show. Thanks for what you do, sir.”

 

Well, thank you for support. We got Crafty Booms. Thank you 14 for the 88. I do appreciate it. I appreciate you guys generosity.

 

But this whole entire Iran situation is not over with. It’s not over with. It might die down for a bit. But why Pakistan? Pakistan arranged the meeting. There’s a few different theories on it. They’re a Muslim country. It’s kind of like they’re not in the war and they arranged the ceasefire. Or maybe Trump, through a back channel, had it. I think what they’re trying to do is stall for a period of time to build up enough forces to try another angle. They’re not going to be happy, they being Israel, is not going to be happy until the IRGC, the current regime in Iran, is gone.

 

So they’re going to keep going at it, and they’re going to obviously stall by time, until they can degrade that regime enough and kill enough of them. What they keep doing, obviously, is killing the elites they’re meeting with. So really, how are you going to meet with them anywhere if you’re killing them other than a situation like this? I mean, Pakistan escorted the jet from Pakistan, when it flew into Pakistan’s airspace. The jet containing the Iranian dignitaries and Iranian authorities, negotiating authorities in Pakistan.

 

I mean, the Israelis just keep on killing. And so Israel is supposed to be backing down in Lebanon, but of course, Israel let loose, what, 100 bombs in 10 minutes, dropped 100 bombs, missiles in 10 minutes and totally destroyed Lebanon. It’s just insanity! So Pakistan was a neutral player and they’re trying to, … There’s probably more explanation than that. But the Iranians can’t go just anywhere and meet just anywhere. They just can’t. Because everywhere they pop up, the Israelis kill them.

 

So, I think what Trump wants to do is build up a force to break them another way or maybe take oil or do something. He’s pulling something! The Iranians so far haven’t trusted anything, though. They don’t trust the Americans at all! Let’s see what Field Marshall has to say:

 

“Thanks for getting our Blair on. Hi, Joel. Thanks. Good luck, everything. Congrats to you and yours. The birth of your first child. Done.”

 

Thank you very much, Field Marshal. I do appreciate it. And when Joel can come on, he’ll be on, that’s for sure. I guess he has to get back on Telegram first and get these cases over with. We’ll see.

 

Yeah, I don’t know. There’s like a long explanation on why they did Pakistan and there’s a few conspiracies about it. But the Iranians. Who are you going to trust if you’re Iranian? So now the negotiating team. The negotiating team is JD Vance and it’s Trump’s son-in-law and it’s the main negotiator. Hold on here.

 

Okay. Daily Signal:

 

“I’ll see Vance to lead the negotiating team.”

 

Yeah, we’ve got like four or five guys in the negotiating team. See here, Steve Witkoff. Yeah. Jared Kushner. They’re both going to be there with J.D. Vance.

 

[52:17]

 

But there’s a fourth as well. I want to say maybe it’s Ambassador to Pakistan. Pakistan has four dignitaries there. Pakistan sets modest goal. Let’s look at Al Jazeera:

 

“Pakistan sets goal. A deal to keep talks going.”

 

They want to keep conversations going. The problem with this particular war so far, one of the reasons that I think the English speaking world elite and sections of Europe really don’t give a shit is that it hurts the BRICS. It really hurts the developing countries. That has become very clear. The developing countries, the BRICS countries are being hurt by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which is kind of an interesting thing because Trump doesn’t like the BRICS countries.

 

But one of the side effects is they are hurt by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and only 15 tankers a day can get through. So the whole entire situation actually hurts the BRICS countries, which I find intriguing. They’re the ones suffering the most.

 

And so that’s probably one of the reasons behind it as well. Pakistan, developing countries. You know, these guys are all like:

 

“We’ve got to stop this war if we can.”

 

The Iranians, supposedly, what they’re saying is they’ve come a long ways in agreeing to various different things, supposedly, but I don’t know. Well, Iran doesn’t want to look like a bad guy internationally. They don’t want to play into the bad guy role. They’re not the aggressor. They’re defending their country, they’re defending their homeland. If Pakistan [Iran] would have shut down the Strait of Hormuz any other time, all hell would have broke loose. The whole entire international community would have came down on Iran and probably removed them somehow some way. But because of the way it happened, No one could really blame Iran. The blame would go to Israel, against Israel in the United States.

 

And Iran has the upper hand and they don’t want to lose that, which is very clever of them. They basically have been playing it very well. They’ve been doing a bang up job in handling themselves so far. I don’t think they’re going to make any mistakes. But they’re going to have to be ready to fight to the death, there’s no doubt about that. Because they’re not going to be happy until they get they get the particular uranium. They don’t want them to have nukes. And Trump wants to send them back to the Stone Age. He’s saying that again. He vows complete decimation and ceasefire warning to Tehran.

 

Now I am guessing he’s saying a lot of this shit just to get them to the table because this is hurting the American economy. But I do know in the back of everyone’s head these guys at the top don’t like the BRICs and they want a way to harm the BRICs. Having the Strait of Hormuz shut down harms the BRICS countries, more than anyone else. You know, the Chinese are prepared, the US is prepared more than most. Europe’s got issues, but the BRICS really has issues, that’s for damn sure!

 

But anyways guys, I’ll be back on Sunday. We’ll talk about it more, 5:30 PM. Thanks you guys for tuning in and I’ll get Blair back on when he can bullshit for a couple hours. White Bitch Triple Six get a hold of me via email if you need Blair’s contact information and he can hook you up with a fitness consulting. That’s what he does. And he’s very good at it.

 

But anyways, cheers guys and thanks for tuning in and supporting the show, as well as all the support out there.

 

[59:21]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/12/2026 = 21)

MountainMan1847
1 day ago
Australia for the white man o/ Heil to my Aussie brothers
17
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
xSTRAWMANx
16 hours ago
Ken oath mate
1
0

traceywilliams
1 day ago
Would’ve loved to hear Blair finish a sentence.
11
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
LiftWaffen
18 hours ago
He is really great at interrupting!

Tristan_Blixt
21 hours ago
you need to listen more and talk less. let blair do the talking
6
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
timmurdock
VerifiedAdminSupporter
20 hours ago
I had lots of questions and only an hour to get them in. Cut me a break or get your own show.
2
1

Correctifier
Supporter
1 day ago
Wotan bless me Aussie mates!
4
0

TheWhitenessoftheWhale
1 day ago
Do they want to humiliate SAS?
2
0

renunciate
Supporter+
22 hours ago
Ben R Smith is a war hero. His treatment is intentional demoralization.
1
0

BradC1988
6 hours ago
Its great to hear Joel Davis has been released on bail and that he hasn’t changed a bit! Hail White Australia! o/
1
0

renunciate
Supporter+
22 hours ago

KingTut999
1 hour ago
after Joel got released his Go, Send, Go or whatever fundraiser link got nuked. so not sure what happened exactly.

Spaceman69
1 day ago
ben robert smith is being crucified by hes OWN CREW testifying against him because he cross some big lines and deserves all that he is getting. rules of engagement brothaaaaaa. you aint above the law big fellow. imagine how bad things were your own crew ratted you out, and rightly so!!! dont take my word for it, go read the court transcripts for yourself or watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J896i3yrTbQ&t=2s come at me nazis, this is the only place you can exercise your racism these days…. prove me right. prove the hate speech laws right!
0
11

‹ Hide 1 reply
renunciate
Supporter+
22 hours ago
You couldn’t resist squawking buzzwords, could you? “Nazi” “racist”. Both propaganda terms used by communist agitators. Label someone with a negative name to justify persecuting them. GFY.
8
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Spaceman69
15 hours ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA are we pretending like joel davis was not a self proclaimed racist nazi LEADER? blaire use to be as well till he got kicked out cause hes missus cucked him with another member of NSN, so he chased the guy down with toma hawks then burned the guys house down- hence went to max security prison.. ohh boy, ya cant make this shat up.. hey whitey.. feel free to white wash the information to your liking… but now its the age of the internet…. that hitler brain wash bullshat aint gonna float. the truth is out there. the internet never forgets
1
4

‹ Hide 1 reply
BradC1988
6 hours ago
Shut the fuck up retard LOL
Spaceman69
1 day ago
blair sounds funny. like he forgot to take meds or sumthin. joels arrest, that racists try to white wash is that the female politician he had hes nazi possy harass AKA “rhetorically rape”, well she ended up quitting her job and moving house for her families safety because of the degree of online treats and harassment she received. i imagine she also took out intervention order against him and hes nazi friends. so yeah its kinda serious!!! you cannot threaten people like that even “rhetorically” especially a politician. thanks to NSN nazis and racists, Australia has passed laws against hate speech. basically it is now ILLEGAL to be racist in Australia. which i think is freaking awesome! an example to the world. these dumb nazis seem to think their freedom of speech includes insulting people to their hearts desires on the daily! like a aussie magistrate has said, people have the right to go about their daily lives without being subjected to your vile hate filled racism. on behalf of immigrants here in aus, thank you nazis for making racism illegal!!! we couldn’t have done it without ya… now we sit back eat pop corn and watch the overwhelming avalanche of court cases these racist dickheads are about to face.. they make for a perfect example of why these laws are necessary. nazi racism destroys common sense!
1
16

‹ Hide 2 replies
bthor29
21 hours ago
Are you referencing the multi million dollar mansion she inherited then spent $800k renovating using her political influence to assist with council approval?
7
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Spaceman69
15 hours ago
completely unrelated. next you’ll be talking about affairs and sex scandals… are you trying to justify rhetorically raping her with threats and harassment?!? because she had an opinion about NSN?
0
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
BradC1988
5 hours ago
Joel’s comments were totally justified, retard. However, your presence in a White country has no justification. You and the rest of the unwelcome brown/black hordes contribute nothing but crime to the host country.
BradC1988
5 hours ago
Again, shut the fuck up you antiWhite piece of shit. Also, you will be going home to your shitty country. Its only a matter of time, shitskin! LOL
0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Jacob Hersant: So this is a video where I’m going to explain this new Bill that the Australian government is bringing out in the wake of the Bondi shooting where two Islamists went and shot a bunch of jewish people. And the jewish lobby has pressured the government to bring out these really extreme laws which practically nobody is happy about, really. Only the jews are really happy. Labor Party obviously draughted these laws on behalf of the jewish lobby. But everyone else seems pretty annoyed about it, so I’ll go through it. I haven’t seen any videos that comprehensively go through what the Bill says and what is so egregious and why it’s problematic. So I’ll do that in this video.

 

First I’ll give a disclaimer that I’m not a lawyer. No lawyer has gone through and talked about all of this stuff. So unfortunately I’m the best that you have. The only reason I’m interested in it is because it’s going to be affecting me and my organisation, the National Socialist Network. So that’s why I’m making this video.

 

I’ll be providing photos of the Exposure draught as I read it. I’ll also show the link so you can go read it yourself to make sure that I’m not misinterpreting it or I’m not making any mistakes. If I’m making a mistake, please message me, tell me how I’m wrong in my interpretation, and I’ll be happy to retract what I said and correct it for people, because I just want to try to give an honest assessment of what this law is and the effects it will have on society.

 

So this is a massive bill, they call it an Omnibus Bill. It is going to change a lot of things.

 

So a lot of its about to do with criminal law and hate speech. But it also does have some gun stuff. Not going to talk about the gun stuff because I don’t know much about guns. And this video is just going to be too long. I’m more interested and know more about the politics aspect of it and the hate crimes and hate speech and that aspect of it.

 

So that’s what I’m going to be talking about. I’m sure there’s someone that can talk about the gun aspect of it and in all likelihood the two are going to be split. The gun stuff will probably be chucked into its own Bill and the hate stuff will be bundled in its own bill.

 

I’m going to start off by talking about what this law does regarding hate and what they call “violent extremism, hate speech, hate crimes” and all the like. It’s all doublespeak. The bill’s called “Combating Anti-semitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026”. So in the title, they don’t even hide who it’s for. Obviously, on behalf of the jewish lobby, they’re the only ones that support this law currently. And because they have an outsized influence over Australia’s politics, that’s why this egregious Bill has even been introduced.

 

Part One is “Aggravated offences for preachers and leaders”.

 

So this just goes into the Criminal Code and it makes it so that there’s a bunch of laws where if a person is a religious official, or a spiritual leader, while they commit the offence, they can be imprisoned for longer. So it aggravates it makes the judge give them a more severe sentence. And the charges specifically are to do with encouraging violence and encouraging terrorism and all these kind of charges.

 

So when you look at the Bill here, it doesn’t specify what the crimes are, but those crimes are basically advocacy of violence and advocacy of terrorism. If this Bill passes, if you are an imam, or a priest [or rabbi?] or some other spiritual leader of a religion, you can be punished more because you advocate violence. So that’s part one.

 

And then I’ll move down to Part Six, bundled part six with part one, because it’s the same kind of thing, the same kind of change there. And it’s just for when these spiritual leaders, the charges are when you’re trying to get a young person, someone under 18, to commit violence as well. And more or less the same thing, though it is in a different section of the bill. They have changed the penalty to a person might commit an aggravated offence if the person is a religious official or other spiritual leader.

 

So in terms of grooming children for violence or for advocating terrorism or inciting violence against a particular group, if you are some sort of spiritual leader, religious official, you can be punished more severely. This is obviously going after Muslims. This is to punish Muslims more severely if they’re caught saying stuff about Israel and Palestinian resistance against Israel. This is pretty obviously what this is directed towards.

 

So Part Two is there’s increased penalty for using a postal or similar service to menace, harass or cause offence. And that’s been increased to five years in jail. So that’s what Joel Davis has been charged with and he’s still being remanded now. I think it’s been two months or maybe even more.

 

[06:09]

 

So Part Three is “Aggravated sentencing factor”. And this affects the Crimes Act 1914. And it basically makes it so all criminal offences can be aggravated by being racist. So if you commit a crime because you’re racist, you can be punished more severely by the judge.

 

Read out the specific part:

 

“The person’s conduct constituting the offence was motivated, whether wholly or in part, by hatred of another person, or a group of persons, and that hatred was because of the person’s belief that the target person or persons in the target group are distinguished by race or national or ethnic origin.”

 

So theoretically, if somebody raped a woman because he hated that woman’s race or nation or ethnicity, he can be punished more severely than somebody who rapes a woman for choice and noble reasons, like lust or hatred of some other kind.

 

Every single crime now, if you can be proven to be a racist, you get punished more severely. That’s basically what this aggravated sentencing factor is if the crime you commit is motivated by hate, well, racism or nationalism, then you can be punished more severely. That’s what this change means.

 

But basically every crime can be turned into a hate crime, essentially. So if you assault or rape or murder, then it can aggravate it if it’s proven that you’re a racist.

 

So Part Four is “Prohibited hate group”. And a prohibited hate group is a designation that the Home Affairs Minister can give out. So the current Home Affairs Minister right now is Tony Burke, for the Labor Party. This legislation allows the government to ban particular organisations. It can ban organisations, it can unban them as well, and they can add multiple names to a ban.

 

So if you ban an organisation, you can’t just rename it because that’s going to be banned as well. They’re just going to add it as an alias. So you can’t just get around the ban by rebranding.

 

So to be designated a prohibited hate group, that group has to have committed a “hate crime”. And they define what a hate crime is so here it is. 1 14. A. So definition of a hate crime:

 

“A hate crime is conduct that would constitute any of the following offences. Urging or threatening violence and offences against groups or members of groups to the extent that the targeted group is distinguished by race or national or ethnic origin.”

 

So either:

 

“Publicly displaying prohibited symbols or giving a Nazi salute.”

 

So a hate crime can either be threatening violence or it can be publicly displaying prohibited symbols, like the swastika or giving the Nazi salute. And then here it says:

 

“A hate crime is also conduct that was engaged in at a time before a provision referred to in subsection (1) commenced and would constitute an offence against the provision had the provision been in force at that time.”

 

What this means is that you don’t have to have committed a hate crime after this legislation passed. If you’ve given the Roman salute or you’ve displayed a swastika, as your group, then you’ve committed a hate crime and you can be listed as a hate organisation. So you can be punished retroactively. I will further explain this, but make no mistake, being listed as a hate organisation is a punishment in itself. So the process is the punishment!

 

And you got to remember, a hate crime can be just political expression, like flying the swastika or moving your arm in a gesture in a Nazi salute. That is political expression. And if you just do that, you can be banned for being an organisation that gives the Roman salute. So you can be banned for retroactive conduct.

 

This is insane, because laws aren’t supposed to be retroactive. Non-retroactivity is a fundamental legal principle. That law should only apply to actions occurring after the law was enacted, not before, preventing new laws from punishing past behaviour.

 

Everyone just takes that for granted. But when you have the jewish lobby demanding laws, they really don’t care about what we take for granted, obviously.

 

For banning an organisation, a conviction is not required. So:

 

“A person does not need to have been convicted of a hate crime in order for the AFP minister (which is the Home affairs guy, so Tony Burke) to be satisfied, an organisation has engaged in conduct of a kind mentioned in paragraph one.”

 

And then there is:

 

“No procedural fairness required. The AFP minister (so Tony Burke) is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness in deciding whether or not the AFP Minister is satisfied for the purposes of this section.”

 

So basically that means the people that are affected by the banning, so say the National Socialist Network was banned, we get no hearing, no say, no chance to respond, no recourse, no explanation about what’s happening. You’re just basically told:

 

“Tough luck! Like, enjoy being banned!”

 

So yeah, you get no hearing, you get no way to explain yourself or try to defend yourself in front of a judge or anything like that. And that’s what they’ve written right here, “no procedural fairness required”. Which is another legal principle that the jewish lobby don’t care about. They don’t care about what’s called natural justice or procedural fairness.

 

So:

 

“Director-General of Security advice to be provided before specifying an organisation as a prohibited hate group.”

 

So Mike Burgess has to give advice to Tony Burke or the Director General of Security has to give advice to the AFP minister and he has to be satisfied that:

 

“The organisation has engaged in activities, and that the activities or the like, the continued engagement in the activities would or are likely to increase the risk of politically motivated violence or of the promotion of communal violence.”

 

You have to use your intelligence here and think about what they’re saying. Obviously the logic that people like Mark Burgess are going to say is that because you’re engaging activities like giving the Roman salute that those activities are going to make it more likely that people go do terrorism.

 

[14:04]

 

So that’s what it’s saying and that’s what’s going to be argued. So if this Bill passes, Mike Burgess is gonna go tell Tony Burke:

 

“Well, yeah, giving the Roman salute makes it more likely that terrorism is going to happen in the future. They need to be banned!”

 

If Mike Burgess thinks that giving the Roman salute, giving the Hitler salute and saying “Heil Hitler” and wearing black clothes makes it more likely that someone is going to go out and blow up something or kill a bunch of people, well then your organisation gets banned.

 

So that’s what happens. So they can list an organisation. And when an organisation gets listed, then it opens up people to be charged with a number of offences that relate to that prohibited hate group.

 

Those offences are:

 

“Directing the activities of a prohibited hate group.”

 

Which can get you 15 years in jail.

 

“Membership of a prohibited hate group.”

 

And you have to keep in mind that being a member of an organisation you can be an informal member of the organisation and you can be charged with this because they define member of a prohibited hate group as:

 

“A member of an organisation includes a person who is an informal member of the organisation and a person who has taken steps to become a member of the organisation. And in the case of an organisation that is a body corporate, a director or an officer of the body corporate.”

 

So if you’re in so-called informal member of an organisation, you can be charged. So:

 

“Membership of a prohibited hate group”, 7 years.

 

“Recruiting for a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Training involving a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Getting funds to, from or for a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Providing support to a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

And most of these offences have a lower offence if you’re convicted for one of them while being reckless rather than, I guess knowingly doing it. So being reckless means that you’re aware of a substantial risk that you’re doing the crime, and it changes like the imprisonment from like 15 years to 10 years if you’re only proven to have recklessly done it.

 

And the only defenses that you have are either you didn’t do the crime or you were a government agent when you were doing the crime. So if you’re some sort of informant or secret agent infiltrating a hate organisation then you have a defence, but otherwise you have no defence.

 

This legislation is obviously directed towards having a chilling effect on advocacy and activism of organisations outside of the mainstream. That’s obvious.

 

And you gotta remember that there is no procedural fairness. The fact that your organisation gets banned and then you have 15 years hanging over your head, that’s the punishment!

 

And obviously having your rights taken away that you can’t politically associate or politically express yourself in that particular way, that’s the punishment!

 

And I’ll go off on a little bit of a tangent here. In my case, the Roman salute case that was brought against me in the Magistrates Court for which I was convicted and then I appealed. Went to the county court and was had had the conviction against me upheld. They argued that the Roman salute offences are very narrow and hence it could be justified taking away that form of political expression. They did admit it was political expression but they said they could take it away because it was relatively narrow what it was.

 

Well you know, now it’s having very serious consequences because that offence, giving a slew has been recategorized as a “hate crime” and it can be used to retroactively ban a organisation like a 300 man organisation and threaten its leaders with 15 year sentences if they continue. A lot of the judiciary get too focused. They get narrow minded, they don’t understand like how dangerous these laws you give them an inch, they’re going to take a mile. And this legislation is taking a mile. It is insanity! Also vindictiveness! Like I don’t know how it could occur to you to have a maximum of 15 years for some of these charges when you can be prohibited as a hate group because you moved your arm in a particular way that offends the jews!

 

And another case that I saw on the news today actually funnily enough was someone who’s been charged with threatening to kill the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. And the charge for which he’s been charged, threatening to kill an MP is a maximum of five years.

 

So you get a maximum of five years for threatening to kill an MP. If you direct the activities of a prohibited hate group. A prohibited hate group that gave the Roman salute. You can be in prison for 15 years. That sounds perfectly reasonable!

 

So Part Five is “Racial vilification offence”. And this offence is:

 

“Publicly promoting or inciting hatred. A person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct in a public place.”

 

And to be clear, the Internet includes a public place.

 

Basically everywhere is a public place except for inside your own home where it can’t be seen by the public. But the Internet counts, as is sending it through the mail, some sort of business, or out on the street or something like that. All counts as a public place.

 

So the conduct is:

 

“Promote or incite hatred of another person, or a group of persons because of their race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, or disseminate ideas of superiority over or hatred of another person, or a group of persons because of the race, colour, or national or ethnic origin of the target or target group. And the conduct would, in all the circumstances, cause a reasonable person who is the target, a member, or a member of the target group to be intimidated, to fear harassment or violence, or to fear for their safety.”

 

And they call the “reasonable person test” as an objective test, but really it just comes down to the judge to decide who a reasonable person is, to describe who the reasonable person is so really, it isn’t actually a objective test. It’s just a subjective test. Like, it comes down to what the judge thinks. It’s not like there’s any empirical data about who this average person is based on polling or anything. It just comes down to the judge, who he thinks, he or she thinks this reasonable person of the group of a particular ethnic or racial group is.

 

[21:42]

 

And obviously you can be charged here with a criminal offence if you:

 

“Disseminate ideas of superiority over a group of persons because of their race, colour, national or ethnic origin.”

 

So you can’t say that particular nations are better than other nations. So if you say “Australia is better than China”, well, you could be charged. You could be charged with this. I’m not saying that that’s likely to happen, but with what this law says, I’m somebody who is disliked by the government. If I said that “Australia is a better society, Australia is a better nation than China”, well, that’s disseminating an idea of superiority over a group of persons because of their national origin. Maybe I could say that and someone feels intimidated or they feel fearful. And the issue is, there’s so many people in this society that feel intimidated or fear from the littlest things. We’ve become a very soft society. And judges love to rule based on sentimentality when it comes to these things! And you can be imprisoned up to five years for publicly promoting or inciting racial hatred. Yeah!

 

So:

 

“For the purposes of subsection 1, it is immaterial whether the target or members of the target group actually are distinguished by the particular race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, or the conduct actually results in hatred of another person or group of persons, or the conduct actually results in any person feeling intimidated, feeling harassment or violence, or feeling fearing for their safety.”

 

So what that says is that they don’t have to prove that any person of that particular race or nation or ethnicity was present and kind of a target of it. They don’t have to prove that hatred was actually kind of incited in somebody. They don’t need to prove that anyone was intimidated, felt harassed, or feared for their safety. None of that actually has to be proven because a judge can come up with this magical, reasonable person of that group, this imaginary person, and say:

 

“This person has been targeted. This imaginary person has been targeted. It could potentially have led to hatred being incited in other people and it could have potentially intimidated or made someone, this imaginary person, fear for their life.”

 

At least you have a defense here for religious teaching or discussion:

 

“Subsection (1) does not apply to conduct that consists only of directly quoting from or otherwise referencing a religious text for the purpose of religious teaching or discussion.”

 

So this is lucky for our Muslim friends who can quote directly from that Hadith saying that the stones and the trees are going to tell them where the so the Muslims are safe in that regard, and so they should be.

 

“Part 7. Hate symbols – Reversing the burden of proof for public interest elements of prohibited symbols offences.”

 

So it means that there’s already these hate symbol laws. So if you display a hate symbol or you display the swastika or give the Roman salute, there were defenses saying that you could do these things as long as there was a public interest like a religious, academic, educational, artistic, literary or scientific purpose that isn’t contrary to the public interest.

 

And previously the prosecution would have to prove themselves that this hate symbol or the salute wasn’t given for one of those legitimate purposes. So it’s been flipped now, that if you display this a symbol or give the salute or anything like that, then you can be charged. And then you have to prove that you did it for a legitimate purpose, like a religious, academic, educational, artistic, literary or scientific purpose.

 

And so basically this gets rid of the presumption of innocence, and so it makes it easier for the prosecution to charge people and drag them through the courts. Because if you post a picture of Hitler with the swastika, you can be charged. They don’t need to prove that you did it for hateful reasons. Actually you need to prove that you didn’t do it for hateful reasons.

 

So that’s what it literally does. It reverses the burden of proof. An example would be if I posted a photo of Hitler next to the swastika. I can be charged easier because the prosecution doesn’t have to prove that I posted it for a hateful purpose. I have to defend myself in court and say, perhaps I posted it for an academic purpose or to teach or something like that.

 

[27:15]

 

The other thing is the prohibited hate group symbols are added to the criminal offences. So it’s not only just terrorist symbols and the swastika and the Roman salute. So if NSN got banned, the converging arrows, for example, the converging arrows, flag or the patch, you’d be able to be charged with displaying that.

 

These laws also have a minimum one year in jail. So a judge has to give you a year in jail if you’re convicted of this.

 

I’ve went through all the hate speech stuff in this Bill with you. I think it’s clear that the people that wrote this Bill don’t care about the basic legal principles that are supposed to underpin the whole of our judicial system, like natural justice, presumption of innocence, freedom of speech, freedom of association, proportionality. Non-retroactivity.

 

So what has been the response? One Nation has come out opposing it, which is good for them. The Liberal Party have come out opposing it as well, but they’ve said that they want to come up with their own version of it, which I suggest would be far more watered down than this, which would be good.

 

But these laws don’t need to be passed. There are laws that stop people. Well, that criminalises terrorism. It’s not like the person who went and shot those people in Bondi is at liberty because there’s a fault in the laws. He’s going to spend the rest of his life in jail. Changing the laws isn’t going to fix any of this. It’s going to make it worse!

 

The real danger isn’t what we have to do to apparently solve “hate”. The problem is what are we going to do to solve the fact that we have a government that wants to destroy all the principles that are supposed to underpin our judicial system because they don’t like particular groups, opposition groups in society, whether they be National Socialist or Islamist.

 

The response from the entire online Right has been very positive. Like everyone is raging about this, like it’s all that anyone is talking about in the Australian Right-wing now. Everyone has come out against it.

 

We have the Home Affairs Shadow Minister, this guy, the dishonourable Jonathan Duniam, some total nobody no one’s ever heard of or cares about. And he was mocking the National Socialist Network for us, saying that this Bill is draconian.

 

Jonathan Duniam:

 

“Of course they cite in that statement that these laws ‘most draconian in the universe, making freedom of speech impossible, etc, etc’. Clearly they’ve seen this identification of formal groupings and hate group listing etc., as something to try and avoid, which is good in one sense.”

 

And then I think he went and checked the Internet and saw that everyone else was saying it as well and then he changed his positions.

 

What’s the response been from the Muslims? The Muslim response has been good. They’ve been coming out against it and you know, they shouldn’t be banned. There’s been like arguments that the problem with these laws is it doesn’t come out hard enough against Islam. These laws shouldn’t be passed at all! Even if they were going to be just confined to Muslims. These laws need to be opposed. We don’t need to ban any of these Muslims organisations. Now just because two Muslims went and killed 15 people, it doesn’t mean that we have to destroy the judicial system that governs 27 million people. Like the threat is not these two Muslim terrorists killing 15 people, it’s the Commonwealth that is unnecessarily going to destroy all of our freedoms. Proposing this supposed solution that’s not even going to do anything. It’s not going to do anything to stop terrorism.

 

And then we saw fat Ross who runs the White Rose Society, she’s an anti-fascist. She described it as “state oppression”. I think you’re right there for once. And then Socialist Alternative came out against it. Their front group for Palestine. So they’ve got a group they use to organise Palestinian activists. They came out against it, so good on them.

 

Jews say it doesn’t go far enough. To be expected. I don’t think I need to comment much more on that.

 

Mainstream media has largely came out against it as well. They’ve been publishing voices that come out against it. They haven’t really been publishing any voices that go for it other than the jews. And everyone, when it comes down to it, everyone hates this Bill other than the jews. And luckily I don’t think it’s gonna pass.

 

And the Greens have come out against it. But they said they might be open to just amending it. But I’m not sure how likely that actually is. But wouldn’t it be just a perfect summation of how stupid and disgusting this country is, if after a Muslim terrorist attack in Bondi they draughted these laws which go to severely persecute and oppress National Socialists and Islamists, if the Greens amended it so that it didn’t go after Islamists and then it only affected National Socialists! So White Australians and National Socialists would be the only ones who get punished for an Islamist terrorist attack. Stranger things have happened. That sounds like something the Commonwealth would do. And that just tells you how reprehensible it is.

 

But in the first place, the fact that we are under threat, the National Socialist Network is under threat from laws that are draughted up from a Muslim terrorist attack says all that it needs to. Why are we getting banned from for an attack that has nothing to do with us? I could at least understand the rationale, even though I’d disagree with it, if some sort of Right-wing or nationalist person went out and shot people, or shot an MP or something like that, I could understand the rationale. But for us to be banned for Muslim terrorism?

 

Yeah, with the Greens and the Coalition coming out against its looking more and more like it’s not going to pass, which is a good thing.

 

Nonetheless, the National Socials Network is disbanding. Some people are disappointed by that. I saw someone on Twitter, or X as it’s now called, said that:

 

“We should be martyrs and that we should continue operations until we get charged with these 15 year offences.”

 

He said:

 

“Just be the martyrs, bro!”

 

Well, perhaps you should do that in my stead. Maybe put on a converging arrows patch, make your own one, dress up in black and go out there, get arrested on our behalf. Just be a martyr, bro!

 

And there’s not going to be any way to get around this. Like they’re not going to be charitable, they’re not going to help you out. If you even slightly do something that could be perceived as continuing the organisation after it gets banned, you’re going to be arrested, charged, remanded and facing serious jail time.

 

[35:20]

 

There’s no oversight in terms of whether or not the listing is correct. Like you get listed, it’s a done deal! You go before a judge, if you are genuinely continuing or doing any of those offences, there’s nothing he can do. He has to find you guilty or you go before a jury. And if they find you guilty, then you’re getting punished severely. You’re getting probably half a decade in jail at the very least.

 

And there’s been people on the far-Right who love to engage in victim blaming. So they say:

 

“The only reason this is happening is because the National Socialist Network engages in street activism, dresses up in black, praises Adolf Hitler, gave the Roman salutes in the past.”

 

All of that kind of hard hitting, confronting street activism. But we’re not the ones that pass these laws. Like agency obviously belongs to the legislature and the people who control the people who run the legislature, so obviously the jewish lobby.

 

So if anyone is to blame for these laws, it’s not the groups that are being banned. And it’s being done in response to these two Muslim shooters in Bondi. But it’s not even their fault. It’s not the fault of Muslim preachers, it’s not the fault of National Socialist activists. And this is the thing. It’s taking the blame away from the actual agent that has perpetrated this, who has created this, and it’s pushing it on the people who are getting targeted and who are going to suffer the most from these laws.

 

The real blame is the jewish lobby and the Australian government. That is why these laws are coming through. The people that push for them, the people who wrote them up and the people that passed them. But the issue is even if we had better optics, these laws would still be being brought through and we would still be under threat of getting banned. And this has been proven by other countries where you have groups like Generation Identity in France that got banned by the French state. I don’t think anyone’s gonna argue that their optics were an issue. Their optics were pretty tame, yet they got banned.

 

So whatever represents the strongest force of nationalism in a particular country, the jewish lobby and the government is going to try to legislate them out of existence. That’s what’s going to happen. And if we were the Nationalist Network and we didn’t wear black clothes and we just wore regular clothes, I guess regular bourgeois clothes, maybe suits and ties and had said “Australia for the Australians”, if we were the biggest group, we would still be getting banned. That’s the truth!

 

In this regard, all roads lead to Rome, as I’m sure some of you have seen in the memes recently with the rabbit with its clock. You know, it doesn’t matter which road you go down, you’re eventually going to go to Rome and it doesn’t matter what road you go down when you have an unjust system, you’re eventually going to be banned by it if you’re a big enough threat to its agenda. So you need to stop bargaining with the system when it’s fundamentally unjust.

 

And the optics people, the only thing that would be different in this situation is these optics people, because of their particular ideas of activism, they would just be a bit more sympathetic.

 

But people should stand for principles and ideas and for an actual fair legal system more than just perception and optics, in my opinion.

 

We really don’t need to total our legal system. What angers the government and the jewish lobby is that we have deeply felt political conviction and that we want to do whatever we can to further our political agenda while staying on the right side of the law. So we’re trying to stay within the legal framework while pushing forward our political agenda, what we deeply, deeply believe in. And that is what angers them the most. And it angers them so much that they don’t care about their own rules, they don’t care about their own judicial system, they don’t care about any of this.

 

Of course, the jewish lobby never really cared. It shows you that the people that profess to be liberal Democrats in this government and one of their claims for legitimacy, how little they care about it. They don’t care about their own rules, they don’t care about their own system anymore.

 

And it’s pretty obvious that these people have no respect for the system of government that our ancestors erected at the beginning of the last century. I might have a so-called “violent extremist” opinion here, but I don’t think we should total our legal system. The legal system and the principles underpinning the judicial system of yesteryear, it’s actually one of the things I do like about this country. And they accused me of hating Australia. You know, I don’t hate Australia. I don’t hate the nation, I don’t hate the continent.

 

I do certainly hate the Commonwealth, because a government that cooks up legislation like this is reprehensible!

 

[41:19]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Gab Comments

top

(Comments as of = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Blair Cottrell: Last night I got a phone call, or a series of phone calls from Joel, our friend Joel Davis.

 

 

And this is the first time Joel’s been able to ring me since he was arrested* [on Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at Bondi beach], I think two months ago, maybe over two months ago. I have to check the dates. It feels like it’s been ages since he was arrested.

 

[* See: “They want to make it illegal to be anti-immigration” https://www.noticer.news/illegal-oppose-immigration-Australia/]

 

 

But he’s been held in Long Bay Jail in a punishment ward, in a cell without a shower, or a TV. Some days he doesn’t get to shower. They basically decide when he showers, taking him from his cell into a different block where there are showers.

 

 

 

You see, Joel has been classified by the prison system as a “national security threat” or risk. I don’t know if they use the term risk or threat, but he’s a national security threat. And what that means is he basically doesn’t have any rights. He doesn’t have the right to any books. He doesn’t have the right to see a priest, a chaplain, inside the prison. He doesn’t have the right to anything. He just sits there. He doesn’t even have a Bible, guys! They won’t give him a Bible.

 

If you’re just like landing on this story now and you don’t know the details, Joel made a social media post criticising a politician or directing people to criticise a politician*.

 

[* “Patriots – I bid thee to rhetorically rape Allegra Spender.” See: Nationalist activist charged over Telegram post and refused bail https://www.noticer.news/joel-davis-arrested-sydney-telegram-post/]

 

 

That’s why he was arrested. That’s why he’s in jail. So no Bible, no shower, he doesn’t get any yard time. He hasn’t seen the sun in well over a month, he said. And he doesn’t have the right to complain because of his classification as a national security threat. I’ve never really heard of a situation like that before, especially not for somebody accused of a crime that’s really not that serious.

 

And Joel’s just the first person they’re hitting with this. They’re going to send a lot of people to jail for comments that they’ve made online in Australia. This is just the start. And what they want to normalise here, what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to create a whole new threshold of crime called “hate crime”. And hate crime or hate criminals will experience similar consequences legally to actual terrorists!

 

So what does this mean for our country? What does this mean for Australia and our future? Well, this is bad for everybody, guys, because this is all a new precedent! This hasn’t happened to anybody in Australia for ideological reasons before. No one has been thrown in jail, declared a national security risk, denied books, denied showers, denied access to basic human rights because of a social media post. This has never happened before in Australia’s history. And it’s bad for everybody!

 

It’s bad if you’re a university student, it’s bad if you’re a bricklayer. If they can do this to Joel Davis, they can do it to you as well. They can do it to anybody who’s saying anything on social media that they don’t like.

 

But that’s what this new “hate speech” and “hate crime” stuff is going to be about. They’ll be throwing people in jail who are critical of the government and its (((lobbyists))), combating “anti-semitism”, combating “hate”, combating so-called “far-Right extremism”. This will all just be the excuse the government uses to arrest people and throw them in jail for having the wrong opinion.

 

And Joel Davis is the exemplary case demonstrating that Joel Davis is the first of hundreds of political prisoners. Future police work won’t really be about catching criminals. It’ll be about sitting in an office, trawling social media, working out who is criticising the government most effectively, who’s getting popular doing it, throw them in jail! It’s like Australia is competing against England and European, Western European nations for who can be the gayest communist country in the world! And this is how it’s going to be for Australians in the future.

 

And this is what happens when you disengage from politics and live in your own fucking bubble! This is what happens when you just sit around watching football and eating chips! And you might think to yourself:

 

“Well, I’m not as vocal as Joel Davis was and I’m not as opinionated as Joel Davis was so I’ll be fine, they’ll leave me alone.”

 

Maybe you’ll be left alone for six months, maybe a year. But eventually something you write on the Internet, something you say to a colleague at work, something is going to bring the police down on you.

 

So Joel, he’s been held in pretty poor conditions. He’s a national security threat according to the jail and the political system. He doesn’t even have a Bible. He doesn’t have access to a shower. He doesn’t get to shower on some days. He doesn’t have any sunlight or any yard where he can actually go out into natural light. But despite all that, he’s in good spirits and he’s confident that he will be released within the next month or two.

 

And I have to say that I feel a sense of pride. I feel proud that he’s my mate because he’s making the most of a bad situation. He’s not letting it get him down. He doesn’t seem to be upset at all! Even though I might not always see eye to eye with him on everything, I think it’s awesome that regardless of the consequences, he stood up for what he believed in. And, yeah, I’m proud that he’s my mate.

 

So you guys will hear from Joel soon enough, and I’ll keep you updated. I’m pretty sure a fundraiser will be launched. A new fundraiser to try to support Joel with his legal expenses will be launched pretty soon. I’ll share that when it’s available. It’ll probably get taken down by payment processes and stuff, but I’m sure the guys supporting Joel will work out a strategy where it can stay up somehow by creating a legal trust fund or something.

 

That’s the update, guys, and that’s my take on the whole matter. And that’s where we’re at in Australia. That’s our country right now!

 

[5:26]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Telegram Comments

top

(Comments as of = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live, and I know we are late, and I haven’t even looked at the live chat. There’s actually some glitch on my laptop where I can’t actually see anything in the live chat on Rumble. Sure, everyone is complaining that we’re late. But oh, I guess suck shit you get in your show.

 

Anyway, we’re starting and we’re here. Tom’s sick, so maybe Jacob will be joining us. But Tom is sick, so there’s no Tom.

 

But it’s The Joel and Blair Show, so you should be okay without him. How you doing this evening, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m great. It’s good to. Good to be back.

 

My first line, I’m already stuttering, but I’m awake. I promise I’m awake. I’m awake enough, and I’m excited. I’m excited to get into another week of news and Right-wing perspective or Nazi point of view, if that’s the way you want to look at it. How about you, Joel? How are you feeling?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m feeling pretty good. Feeling quite good, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I hope you’re feeling better than your hair looks.

 

Joel Davis: I kept trying to make this thing that’s sticking up here to stop sticking up, but I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be time for a haircut, bro. Just throwing it out there. You’re still an attractive man, so don’t worry.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it might be time for a haircut, but I don’t know, I’ve got, like, a distinctive look going on. I don’t know if I want to just go back to some, like, normie cut. I like to be different.

 

But anyway, the show this evening, I think we should just get straight into it, because I haven’t actually spoken to you about this, but kind of funnily enough, I think this act, literally is the biggest story in racism globally right now, is this story which builds off the back of, …

 

A lot of people who are on Twitter will know the account at Barry Stanton GBP, and it’s one of the funnier accounts on Twitter.

 

Basically, he had a profile picture of this kind of old British guy. You would imagine Baz down the pub having a pine of Carling. And he had this whole bit where he was like, this racist boomer, but it’s kind of evolved where now he’s just going, like, full, hardcore tirade, basically calling people the n-word and getting away with it and just heaps of anti-pajeet posting, anti-jew posting as well. Pro Hitler posting, pro, you know, British patriot posting. Just a lot of just so much based stuff. But his account is going ridiculously viral. Like, whenever anyone goes on the timeline, you just see heaps of Barry Stanton tweets with insane amounts of likes and views and he’s just become so powerful, it’s ridiculous! Like, he’s just like, dominating Right-wing Twitter, this force.

 

And somehow Twitter banned him from having a profile picture, which I’ve never seen before. So he has no profile picture, but it only made him stronger.

 

Anyway, you see his stuff all over Twitter. I think particularly the anti-anti Indian posting seems to have really been picked up by the algorithm and as a result, now World bank has halted its advertising on Twitter because basically its ads were seen. I’ll read the article here. The World bank has ceased all paid advertising on Elon Musk’s social media platform X, which was formerly Twitter, after a CBS news investigation found promoted advertisements from the organisation showing up under a racist post from account that prolifically posts pro-Nazi and White nationalist content. CBS news found that a verified X account with more than 115,000 followers had posted a racist image alongside a post praising Europe’s colonisation of Africa.

 

Anyway, the post is literally this. It was a picture of some shitty part of London where blacks live and it said, Africans in Europe. And it’s real dirty. And then a picture of this is probably in South Africa.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s worse stuff on X. Why is this a big deal?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just true. It’s like, these are Africans in Europe, these are Europeans in Africa. It’s just true. It’s just two different pictures which are true.

 

But yeah, the truth is racist. As we’ve been saying, our enemies in both ourselves and our enemies agree that the truth is racist. We’re just happy about it and they’re not. That’s really the only distinction.

 

But, yeah, so this is interesting because obviously there’s a lot of pressure that has been piling up upon Twitter to censor the platform. But I’ll be honest, like, of course there’s some big accounts that are kept off, but I think the censorship seems to have relaxed over the last few months. If anything, people are cutting quite loose on the timeline in a way that I haven’t really seen in many, many years. And really hardcore racial stuff is going gangbusters, like the really kind of supremacist or hateful connotation, or look at how disgusting this Indian is. These kinds of posts are going viral and that’s one of the most tame Barry Stanton tweets, to be honest.

 

And it’s just a very interesting paradigm, because for a very long time, the narrative was that we don’t want to be hateful, we don’t want to be supremacist. We want to come across as though we love everyone and we’re just rational and reasonable. And here’s our agreeable arguments as to why people deserve rights, too, or why people should have their own countries as well.

 

Apparently, this was supposed to be the way that we outreach to the masses and the so-called egregious wignat, racist supremacist hardcore content was holding us back. Apparently, it made us look unhinged. It made us look hateful. And this apparently would push away normal people. This wouldn’t be popular.

 

But it seems like those trends are the complete opposite on Twitter right now. It seems like actually, and I posted about this on Telegram last night, it seems like the opposite logic is actually starting to express itself now that we have freedom to post almost anything on Twitter.

 

But, you know, we’re able to go pretty hard on Twitter, unlike we have been able to in many, many years, to the point where you can have 4chan level discourse on Twitter.

 

And also Twitter, I think, removing you used to be able to see every account you click on their likes and you could see all the tweets that they liked. That’s no longer the case that got changed. People criticise that, but in a way, maybe that has inspired a lot of accounts to grow some balls and just like, whatever they want because they’re not afraid of coming across in a negative way because they like something. You can only see who likes your tweet if it’s your tweet, but no one else can see if they liked it.

 

And so as a result of these changes, it seems like, yeah, the really hardcore content is actually doing very, very well on Twitter.

 

And I think it’s illustrating a principle of propaganda, which I think really is the essence of Goebbels philosophy of propaganda, which is that emotion, not reason, is really the essence of good propaganda. You want to grab people in a kind of visceral way, connect to deep seated emotions. It’s not about calmly laying out your case rationally so much in propaganda as presenting your enemy in a way that provokes a strong emotional reaction in the target audience and presenting yourself in a very sympathetic light. Like, another thing that I’m seeing is there’s a lot of pro-White content, which basically is just, it just presents a bunch of sexy White people being sexy.

 

And then there’s like some swastika and some Hitler edited into it or something, and content like that goes crazy! Or just a picture of a hot White chick with an ugly black chick.

 

And it’s like one race, the human race is sarcastically put as the caption or something like this stuff goes wild as well on Twitter. And this is apparently distasteful and morally offensive and all the rest of it.

 

But I think people like morally offensive, distasteful, visceral propaganda.

 

Blair Cottrell: So this is illustrating they like it more than they used to the new dissent is a more extreme or more raw message than it was seven years ago. Like old dissent was:

 

“Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, protect our culture, and we stand against the Left.”

 

That was dissent seven or eight years ago. Dissent now is:

 

“Here’s why Hitler was right. Racism is natural and good, and Leftists aren’t human!”

 

So dissent has evolved. It’s become more radical or just more straightforward. What do you think about that? Is that a good thing? It’s more fun.

 

Joel Davis: Um, well, I think it is because the political situation that we face is a situation that is so desperate in a certain way because our enemies have so much power, so much of the odds are stacked against us. And really the problem is that Whites in general lack confidence. They lack aggression. They lack, yeah, they lack force of will. They’re constantly kind of morally second guessing themselves and feel this social pressure to come across in a certain way.

 

Whereas particularly in an online setting where people can be anonymous and have freedom to explore ideas and opinions that they would feel, that would ostracize them in normal social situations, that frees White people up to then tap into the dark side, tap into what’s been repressed, tap into the places they’re not allowed to go. And there’s a certain kind of allure because racism has been charged with so much social stigma, and then it creates a kind of allure, paradoxically, a kind of, ooh, that’s a little bit fun because it’s precisely because it’s been repressed.

 

Like, a lot of homosexuals, for example, claim that it kind of sucks for them now that everyone accepts gays because it’s not as fun. Used to be more fun when everyone hated gays. Maybe it’s more fun to be racist when everyone hates racists. I don’t know. I don’t really want to equate racism with sodomy, obviously, but there is a certain allure to moral transgression.

 

Moreover, the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is racism truly moral transgression? Is that what it is?

 

Joel Davis: Well it’s all relative. It’s transgressive against the morality of our current society. We could say it’s nothing. Is there an objective moral framework? Would that objective moral framework prohibit racism? I would say no, insofar as it could exist, because racism is completely natural and it’s based in truths like that. Barry Stanton, Meme, “Africans in Europe, Europeans in Africa”, it’s just true. It’s just a statement of fact. When you post a picture of a disgusting Indian and they just look ugly, and then you put them up against a pretty White girl and you say, one race, the human race, sarcastically. It’s appealing to your implicit aesthetic judgements. You know, that one person looks almost like a different species than the other person just looking at the two of them. And it’s saying:

 

“How ridiculous is this notion? One race, the human race?”

 

You can aesthetically feel that there’s something wrong about this anti-racist ideal, and that offends the enemy because they must also make the same aesthetic judgement. They must also be able to feel the same way. It would be incomprehensible!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you ever have this experience where it suddenly becomes clear how desensitized to general racism you are compared with standard Australian citizens? Because we surround ourselves more so often than regular people with autistic racists and National Socialist activists and so forth. And these people are casually racist pretty much in all their conversations. And it starts feeling quite normal. It’s not until you have a conversation with a regular person at work somewhere in society and you see them either laugh or react in a way that’s kind of expressing shock! You kind of stop and acknowledge at that point that, wow, like, what I said wasn’t even that extreme. And this person’s, like, really stunned by it. It really puts into perspective how sensitive the average citizen still is to racism, because I’m not sensitive to it anymore.

 

I mean, I’ve been called a “Nazi” that many times, as have many people in my community.

 

And so the word kind of just loses its bite, but that only, it only loses its bite to me personally, to other people. I wonder, does racism and the phrase Nazi, does it still hold the same taint that it once did? What do you think? Is it becoming more of an accepted thing? Is it becoming more of a normal thing? Because based on my experience with ordinary people, it’s really not like in private conversations behind closed doors, amongst family members. Yeah, people will be racist, but it’s still extremely taboo in Open Society, for obvious reasons, because there’s social and financial consequences. But do you think it’s better now for us than it was in the past? Do you think it’s easier to get people to open up to casual racism than it was before? What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: I think it is, but it depends.

 

And this is why I wanted to talk specifically about the question, because I identified this, actually, last year. I said I think we should focus as a movement more of our propaganda specifically against Indian migration. And I said this would be true, particularly in the Australian context, because Indians are the largest group of migrants that are coming in now. And now they’re the largest non-White group in Australia. But there was other reasons why as well, one being that I think there’s a visceral reaction that people have of disgust towards Indians.

 

And you can see the anti-Indian propaganda, like we look at, like, for example, the propaganda that is racist against blacks. It talks about crime rates, you know, it talks about violence, etcetera. With Indians, it’s not so much what Indians do to us. And we’ll talk a little bit about how Indians are sexual predators or whatever, the whole send bobs in virgin meme. But most of it is kind of just how disgusting are these people? You know, and this, like, scatological association and yeah, just like that. It just plays upon their inherent, revulsive nature that people find detestable about them. And then it triggers all of these really, like, visceral responses where they think about their experiences with Indians and how just displeasurable they are socially, professionally to work a lot of the propaganda, though, is just that they stink, they’re ugly, they smell bad. You know, it’s really basic stuff.

 

But when I talk about Indians in a negative way with normies, whether it be when I’ve been employed at various places or hanging out with normie friends who maybe don’t really know who I am or even if they know who I am, I find that they’re very open to basically being racist against Indians. Where if I spoke about black people or I spoke about jews, there would be. I spoke about black people. They would feel apprehensive and guilty because there’s this connotation of what we enslaved them. And they’ve watched all these Hollywood movies over the years about the black man that just can’t catch a break and has to struggle his way to the top. And there’s been all these inspirational black sports heroes that have been presented to us in different actors that are black guys that we’re supposed to identify with, that have been heroes in all of these Hollywood movies. And black people have a certain charisma. They’re able to solicit sympathy because they have a certain kind of coolness, a certain charisma. They make music that people like. Anyone who’s into sport or culture in some way who’s a normie will probably, like certain, like, famous black people and think that they’re cool. Indians don’t have any of that.

 

And when you talk about jews, obviously that evokes the Holocaust and genocide, but also in a more. With more politicised people, they realise that if you go against the jews, that opens up a whole can of worms. It’s kind of scary, right? Because jews are so powerful. They’ve got all these institutions that will come after you if you speak against them. But Indians don’t have that either. They don’t have all of these pro-Indian institutions set up to attack like, to attack anti-semites or. They don’t have all of the sympathy that has been built up culturally to kind of make you seem like an asshole if you speak negatively about blacks and aren’t sufficiently sympathetic and make, you know, make black sympathetic characters.

 

So as a result of all of this, they’re kind of like the easy sitting duck for racists, because they’ve just come in recently. They don’t really have this whole cultural and institutional apparatus set up to defend them. They don’t have a sympathetic narrative that people have been brainwashed with. They’re not sympathetic as people because they’re personality like. They’re just not cool. And they’re the least cool race.

 

Blair Cottrell: They seem to think they’re pretty cool! They, like, visually, from what I can tell, they think they’re pretty cool! Have you noticed that as well? They say the same.

 

Joel Davis: It makes them objectionable, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. There’s, like, an inability to see themselves from the perspective of others. Like, they’ve got this idea about themselves, and that’s all that matters.

 

My primary grievance concerning Indians, as I’ve raised before, is noise pollution, Indian children running around the streets where I live, barefoot and screaming at midnight on a work night. What’s going on there? Where are the parents? The parents don’t seem to mind. The parents are all inside jabbering on about something or on some loud international phone call at all hours of the morning. Have you noticed that?

 

If you’re watching this, you probably notice this if you go, you know, travel via Uber or ride share service. Look, the three situations where you’re going to be speaking with an Indian person are probably in rideshare, at convenience store slash 711 service stations, or when some government or bank bureaucrat rings you to try to get you to complete some survey or they’re analyzing your life or something like that. Your banking details. That happens sometimes.

 

And first of all, it’s very difficult and frustrating to listen to Indian people try to speak English. They’re very bad at it. Unless they were born and raised here. Their accent is. It’s just an atrocious accent to try to listen to. It’s something that frustrates you and I don’t think there’s any accent that is more frustrating for me personally, especially when you’re dealing with people who are in either position of government. They’re working in management for a bank or even in healthcare, and you can’t properly understand them, but they also can’t properly understand you. What kind of fucking sense does that make? It doesn’t make any sense. It’s ridiculous!

 

But this country is ridiculing itself by allowing a free flow of Indian migrants into the country and then propping them up in positions where they’re causing general strife and frustration because no one can fucking understand what they’re saying.

 

But like I said, it’s not just the accent. The accent is some. They’re always talking. That’s what I was trying to get at. They’re always on the phone. They’ve always got their Airpods in. They’re always talking in rideshare services in public places, if they live near you, they’re always carrying on and making noise. And I honestly think because I’ve got some experience in public protests and from public protesting and being counter-protested by Marxist activists, I learnt the term “noise pollution”. Protesters consciously employ this method to try to drown out the opposing side or just drive away people who aren’t sympathetic to their ideology specifically. They’ll make as much noise as they can. And Indians, probably not consciously, but maybe it’s part of collective instinct. They seem to be doing this, and the result is that people leave. People leave the area, they move away and they avoid them.

 

And I think this is why Indians end up sort of clustering up in various suburbs and taking over certain areas. Residential areas, I think don’t underestimate the power of noise pollution. They may be doing it as part of a collective instinct to drive us away, but I don’t think they need to try very hard to drive the majority of Australian population away. I think people just don’t want to be near them generally, and for various reasons that are, you know, legitimate grievances. It’s not just blind racism:

 

“Oh, we don’t like these people because of the way they look.”

 

Or something like. They just don’t seem to have the same basic manners and way of conducting themselves, which expresses the general politeness and concern for others that we are raised with, probably because they come from a country that has billions in numbers and they’re not really used to showing basic concern and consideration to their fellows.

 

But, yeah, noise pollution, I can’t stand it! Can’t stand the accents. Can’t stand the noise. It’s constant!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s real. And I haven’t worked in it myself, but I’ve had a lot of close friends who have. Who work in it and the stories they tell me because obviously there’s a lot of Indians who work in it and the constant buck passing, lying, like, deceptive nature where. And kind of leaning upon you, expecting you to do all the work the way that they nepotistically aid one another. And I’ve experienced this, too. Working with Indians. They are conniving. They try to do the least amount of work possible. They’re seriously incompetent, they’re dumb, but also lazy.

 

And they also treat you like you’re dumb in the way that they try to scam you and manipulate you.

 

But then, because they group up and can pull this kind of racism card in corporate settings as well, to protect themselves, they’re very difficult to get rid of or deal with. So anyone who has to work with Indians hates it. Women, generally speaking, hate Indians the most. Like I find with women, women are more offended by racism on average, when you express racist opinions.

 

But at the same time, when you talk negatively of Indians, even I’ve experienced, you know, Left-wing women who, when I start saying racist shit about Indians, they just go along with me. They completely drop their whole Left-wing ideology because they’ve had so many negative experiences of creepy Indian men saying sexually explicit things to them or maybe trying to touch them in a weird way or stalk them or look at them with freaky looking eyes and yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What is the Indian mating strategy? Describe it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, if you look at how ugly Indians are.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on. Before you continue, describe the Indian mating strategy. And compare it to our mating strategy in contrast.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. So I’m just starting at this point to illustrate my theory. Indians are so ugly. The women, you know, they’re hairy. They don’t have good figures. They don’t have good. Like, they’re just the most ugly race!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that. Do you think that. Let me butt in quickly. Do you think the general lack of muscle mass and the unappealing physical features are a result of Indians actually being a hybrid race? They aren’t actually a natural human species. They’re the result of a mass intermixture of different races. Do you think that’s what it is?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, definitely! I think that’s definitely the case.

 

But also, if we think about what a race needs to perpetuate itself, like, Whites are equality over quantity race. Right. That’s why we have a mating strategy. That is what they call! Selected in the sense that it’s about high long term investment. We I think in particular, northwest Europeans have the greatest predisposition towards monogamous bonding. We can see this even in the pre. It wasn’t just something that Christianity brought to us or something that, like, monogamy was something that was practiced in even more ancient northwest European societies in a somewhat unique way. A lot of rest of the world had a lot more polygamy for its upper class Mendez as a norm.

 

But anyway, the point is that Indians are so ugly.

 

So if you had to think about how would the sexuality of an Indian have to be tuned in order to want to have sex with Indian women? Like Indian male? Well, the Indian male would have to be made so horny and so desperate that he would find having sex with a disgusting Indian woman alluring, that he would have a passion for it. And obviously, there’s 1.4 billion of them on the planet. So he must have a very intense passion for breeding with the Indian female. So because they’re. Because the race lacks quality. It requires quantity, right?

 

So the Indian has to biologically, by necessity, for the Indian genome to spread itself and conquer the world and take on territory and so on, and has to basically do it through raw biomass, and that biomass multiplies itself through the depraved, horny nature of the Indian male, who has to be basically wanting to rape anything that moves in order to perpetuate that disgusting race in perpetuity.

 

You know if I had the option of, basically becoming some, like, volsel and just dying alone, and having sex with an Indian woman every night, I would choose to be a volsel and die alone because I’m an Aryan. I need to actually have a woman that of quality in order to actually inspire me to want to breed. And that’s because I come from a line of high quality women and high quality men who have those breeding standards, and that produces a high quality European civilisation where we have things like high culture and morality, like social standards and so on, and a culture of honour and respect.

 

The Indian lacks these things. The Indian completely lacks these things because he needs to lack these things. If an Indian started having this kind of standards of a White person, well, then he would become kind of also repulsed by his own people and would no longer perpetuate it. So therefore, I think depravity necessarily is the breeding strategy of such a race.

 

And as you say, it’s a mixed hybrid race. We see this similar tendencies in the Middle Eastern peoples, who are also a mixed hybrid race, where the stories that you get came out of Afghanistan and places like that, where all the child rape and they’re having sex with goats and all this kind of stuff. And this stuff goes on in India as well, I mean, the horror stories that you hear coming out of India about the rape and the depravity of the paedophilia and all the rest of it. You see videos on Twitter of some Indian guy puts on a dress, and then all the Indian men just basically jump on him and rape him because he looks like a woman. They just have, like this insane, sex crazed, frenetic energy.

 

And so, you know, that turns women off. So that also, I think, enables it to be a socially acceptable form or the most socially acceptable form of racism, precisely because women, in many respects, uphold the social paradigm somewhat more than men, because women are more likely to get offended. And when a man gets offended at something that you say, you can have a kind of dispute that could potentially go to blows.

 

And so a weak man, if he gets offended in many social situations at what I say, will choose not to say anything. He’ll wait and say something behind my back because he’s afraid of confronting me, because there’s a potential for physical violence, whereas a woman doesn’t fear that I’m going to beat her up because in our society, we don’t put our hands on women.

 

And so a woman will get offended at what I say and then develops this confidence to be able to express her opinion and express her offence and her emotions, because women are encouraged to express their emotions more than men. There’s no threat of violence, generally speaking, over their head. So as a result, women are more influential over the social paradigm. So a form of racism that appeals to women is therefore going to be a more socially advantageous and selected form of racism.

 

Blair Cottrell: I heard a really interesting remark from one of our colleagues in Melbourne about a week ago, because he grew up in Soviet Union, I think it was a Ukrainian province, and he said at the time where he was born. And afterwards, though, it was a much more. This is pivoting from the point a little bit, but it’s interesting still. He said it was more socialist at that point and less communists. And I kind of understand the distinction he was trying to make there.

 

Basically, what he means is it was less hardline, but what he said was, socialism is actually really good if you’re interested in girls or women generally. And his reason was, in socialist society, everyone makes the same amount of money. So it doesn’t matter if you’re a doctor, doesn’t matter if you’re a taxicab driver. Women basically marry anyone because it doesn’t make a difference who has the money. No one has the money, right, except government officials and a very small percentage of people at the top of the strata. I thought that was interesting. I thought:

 

“Well, yeah, that would be one perk, I suppose.”

 

Because once economic value and wealth is eliminated from the female measurement process, male measurement process, well, what are they going to go for after that? Probably genetics. I mean, genetics are high on the priority list for women. I think for some women, they are as high as wealth, and for some women, not as high as wealth.

 

But that was just an interesting conversation I had with this fella, and I never really considered that as a actual benefit of living in socialist society that some of the more beautiful women would be available to marry because wealth isn’t a thing that they’re actually looking for because it doesn’t exist in the broad strata.

 

Joel Davis: Maybe that’s a good argument for socialism. You know, like the sexy guys have fair, not get, like, out-competed by, like, rich, ugly guys more beautiful, more beautiful selection process, you get more hotties. Unfortunately, socialism seems to have the opposite effect, though. It seems to enable a lot of the dysgenic breeding to keep perpetuating itself in a lot of it depends what kind of socialism. We’ve got. A, obviously, on this show, we advocate for National Socialism, which means we want a kind of robust eugenics program, which we discussed last week on the show somewhat extensively but, yeah, back to this subject of anti-Indian hatred. I think it’s particularly poignant in Australia and Canada, but also in Britain, because they get a lot of Indian immigrants there.

 

But it’s particularly Australia and Canada that seem to really get in New Zealand to an extent that really get inundated with Indians relative to total population size. And as, like, a portion of total immigrants. Like, they get a lot of Indian immigrants in America, but America gets immigrants from so many different places that they’re just a small snapshot. And it also seems like in America, they get the high quality Indians. Like, the Indians they get into America are like H1-B visa* Indians.

 

[* The H-1B is a Visa in the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 101, that allows U.S. employers to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. It is the largest Visa category in the United States in terms of guest worker numbers. A specialty occupation requires the application of specialised knowledge and a Bachelor’s degree or the equivalent of work experience. Wikipedia]

 

In other words, Indians that work in tech or usually like a higher stock, higher IQ portion of their population that makes it into America.

 

And then the lower grade Indians then go to Canada or Australia or something.

 

So Americans don’t seem to fully grasp reasons why Canadians and Australians hate Indians so much, because the Indians that they meet are of a bit of a higher quality.

 

But nevertheless, in Australia and Canada, they are an absolute menace. And they’re coming in with incredible speed and incredible size, particularly in recent years. And Canadians are widely known as basically the nice guys of the White race. Canadians, you know, they’re probably some of the most, least racist Whites in many respects. They’re very wholesome. They’re very chungus.*

 

[* Chungus is a meme featuring a chunky version of the cartoon character Bugs Bunny, typically captioned Big Chungus. It began as gaming joke that spread online as a slang term for anything (adorably) “chunky,” similar to chonky.]

 

But from what I’ve seen coming out of Canadian social media and my friends in Canada, it seems like anti-pigeon racism is rapidly spreading and intensifying in Canadian society, which goes to show how potent the Indian can be as a trigger for racial consciousness. And we’re noticing a similar dynamic here.

 

So for those reasons, I think you kind of want to strike the enemy at their weakest point, right? You know, obviously, we want to teach people about the problems with all other races and the necessity to maintain a White only political order and to take the side of your own race in general. Not just dislike Indians, but you don’t mind Asians or jews or something.

 

Obviously, we reject that. We are racialists. We are ethno-nationalists.

 

But if you can find some form of racism for people to embrace at least one form, now you’re kind of getting somewhere. You know, a lot of people thought that would be the same logic with the anti-muslim thing, but the problem with that is that it can be kind of portrayed as the problem is with their religion, not with the people. So, like:

 

“If they would just convert to Christianity or become atheists or something, it would be fine. Like, our problem isn’t with Middle Eastern people. It’s their religion, it’s their culture. That’s the problem, not the people.”

 

But that’s an expression of the people. You know, there are, you know, Indonesian Muslims that don’t behave the same as Middle Eastern Muslims because they’re Indonesians, even if they have the same religion. And I don’t like the religion of Islam.

 

But the point is that that’s not the fundamental problem.

 

And you can see that, particularly in Britain, with people like Tommy Robinson and so on, who kind of redirect a certain kind of racist instinct into a kind of religious dispute. So with the issue with Indians doesn’t really, because people aren’t. The issue isn’t with Hinduism. The issue is with Indians. You know, then also when you have, like a kind of anti-East Asian form of racism, East Asians are kind of the nicest, most civilised other race from, in most people’s personal experience. And I know that there’s lots of negative experiences that people have with East Asians that we could go into, but a lot of people are positively predisposed towards them.

 

So that’s a kind of a harder target to fixate upon. In Australia, we could talk about the problems with the Chinese because there’s the Chinese state is so big and powerful and has influence over Australia, and people can and get concerned about that.

 

But it’s more of an abstract political problem than an interpersonal problem.

 

So it’s a bit harder than the anti-Indian racism to provoke.

 

And then when it comes to the jewish question, a lot of people don’t really have much experience interpersonally with jews. And the jewish problem is, again, it’s kind of more abstract. It’s more, it’s a little bit, it requires a little bit more discussion to explain it to someone. People have to read and talk and learn to learn about jews, whereas, like Indians, you just have to basically experience an Indian. And most people now have in their everyday life in any kind of, particularly in a major Australian city, but most major Western cities, you will experience them.

 

And so therefore, it’s an easy target.

 

And as I said with blacks before, like that, blacks, you know, they’re easy to kind of get people to understand the problems with, but at the same time, they have a lot of cultural and moral sympathy that they’re able to solicit and a certain charisma.

 

So when we kind of look at all the options for a target, an easy target to fixate upon the Indian and also Indians are spreading all over the world at an incredibly fast rate. They just seem to be multiplying, multiplying, multiplying everywhere, like some kind of virus and infection.

 

So therefore they’re like the perfect target, I think, for racism to blow up and become, in a certain sense, mainstream.

 

Blair Cottrell: And is that the end? Is that the end goal? Is that the end goal? Using the Indians as a means to an end, to mainstream, more racist viewpoints?

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely, yeah. What do you agree with the analysis? Like, do you think it’s a or do you have any counterpoints?

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that came to mind was that when you said Tommy Robinson was diverting, I suppose, what you could describe as the collective instinct for self preservation, which is what racism is essentially, or what it should be anyway. Racism is always associated with something ugly, and in reality, it’s a completely natural thing. And it doesn’t have to be hateful or negative in its expression. That’s what I believe. But diverting that kind of healthy racism into religious disputes, that is to say, convincing people that race isn’t the problem, it’s just religion. We just have a problem with religions.

 

You have to remember that race has an influence over the religion. Like, if a large group, ethnic group, adopts a religion, they’re going to inject some of their own ethnic predispositions into the religious dogma as well. It’s the religion takes on a new form depending on the race that’s adopting it. I have a story about this, actually. I was in jail once with a Lebanese guy named Charlie. I won’t tell you his full name because I’m not a name dropper, but Charlie was a Christian, a Lebanese Christian.

 

However, he was very passionate about his Christianity. And I heard him one night, well, when I was in my cell, because he was in a couple of cells down from where I was, I heard him singing in Lebanese, loudly.

 

And I thought, maybe he wasn’t Christian. Maybe he was just saying that to throw me off, like, maybe he’s a Muslim, right? So I asked him the next morning, I said:

 

“What were you singing last night? Singing the Quran? I thought you were Christian.”

 

And he looked at me, almost offended, and he said:

 

“No, man, I was singing the Catholic chime, like Hail Mary or something, but I was singing it in Lebanese.”

 

And he added:

 

“Like, a melody to it as well.”

 

Which we don’t do. European Christians don’t do that. We don’t sing Hail Mary with a melody aggressively. It’s just like something that we summarize isn’t it, Joel? It’s like, how would you describe the way we express it? We kind of just memorize it and summarize it as a prayer. It’s not a song. And the Muslims, by Muslims, I mean Arabs. The Arabs get really into singing the entire Quran, actually, I think, is a song. The way it’s actually read a song sung by men, that’s the way it’s supposed to be expressed. And they love their singing. The men in Islam, even though Lebanese Charlie was a Christian, he was singing and aggressively singing Catholic prayers in his native language as though he was a Muslim. Right. Other Catholics, other Christians don’t do that.

 

So he had injected or fused his own ethnic disposition with the religion that he had adopted. So, realistically, all Islam is, if you look at it fundamentally, there’s some sort of points in which it deviates from fundamental Christianity somewhat, but all it really is is the Arabs having adopted the same Abrahamic faith and fused it with their own ethnic disposition, which means their own racial, natural way of behaving.

 

So I think it can’t be overstated, can’t be understated, can’t be overstated. I’m not sure if that’s the right way to put it. How much influence a race has over not just religion, but environment itself. Everything flows downstream from race and the natural character that the race facilitates. Possesses. Right? That’s what came to mind while you were explaining what you were explaining.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, that’s definitely true.

 

And, I mean, the fact that the Indians have a religion that was originally invented by Aryans and has a lot of similarities with Germanic Paganism and Norse Paganism and so on, because originally the people groups that these traditions descend from are actually the same.

 

But then looking at basically what Hinduism has become and how distinguished it actually is, it is another demonstration of that it’s because the blood mixed down and it turned into something completely different, reflecting the blood of the current pajit.

 

And the same is true even in Europe. You could look at the Protestant Reformation, as you know, in a certain sense, an expression of Celto Germanic tendencies, the differences between Orthodox Christianity and western forms of Christianity, as well as representing a different kind of ethnic and racial kind of predisposition.

 

But, yeah, I think that’s clearly the case.

 

But I think also on this, while we’re on this subject, I think there’s also, like, another layer here to consider, which is when it comes to, let’s say, our propagandistic focus, a lot of the time, people say:

 

“Well, you shouldn’t be so negative. It shouldn’t be about hating other races or hating other groups. It’s about standing with your own group.”

 

And obviously, fundamentally, that’s what we are motivated by. We are motivated by defending our people, our way of life and the future for our children, our grandchildren and so on. That’s fundamentally what it’s about, that we love our own people, we love our own culture, and we want to see it perpetuate today. I was just thinking about this when I took a walk down to the shop and I live in a pretty White area now, and everyone was White and it was just very pleasant. You know, sometimes in some parts of Australia that are very non-White, when I’m walking down the street, I’m kind of got my eye on people because I don’t really trust all the other faces and it’s a very hostile environment and I feel very kind of dirty. I don’t really like being where I am and I just have, I just do my business and get the hell out of there.

 

Whereas I was actually just enjoying being out in public today just amongst, you know, other White Australians. And women were coming past smiling at me and dudes gave me the kind of nod as they came past a few times. And it was just pleasant and it seems very basic, but it’s an indication of you’re where you belong. You know, you feel comfortable in your own community, you feel safe in your own community. You feel like you are where you belong. And that sense of belonging has deeper implications than just a kind of chungus feeling or something. It indicates that you are actually safe and secure in general. Right, that you have.

 

And that’s why we’re ethno-nationalists. Like, it’s if who ran the country wasn’t important, then it wouldn’t matter, you know how many races come into the country because it wouldn’t be important. But it is important, right?

 

Because if your people aren’t running the country, that means other people are. And if other people are running the country, they’re going to run it for their interests, against your interests.

 

So you need to ensure not just that your people are running the country, by the way, that people loyal to your people are running the country, so that the state, the society and so on is built in such a way that it basically reflects your interests and the interests of your family and your community. So that sense of belonging pertains to this kind of basic human necessity. The man is a social animal. Man is on an island. You can’t express your total freedom as an individual. You can’t achieve your potential as a human being. You can’t flourish as a human being without a community and a society and a nation and a state that reflects your identity and reflects who you are. You just simply can’t. You’re basically an alien, an imposter in someone else’s community, someone else’s society, otherwise. And so many of your options are foreclosed.

 

But, yeah, this point is quite abstract. You know, and Hitler and Goebbels talked about this a lot that when you engage in propaganda, you don’t want to be too abstract, you don’t want to be too highfalutin. You immediately lose a lot of people. You want to have simple messaging that gives people a simple target to hate, that focuses negative emotional energy on that target, and galvanises people around that basically simple narrative. These are the people. This is the problem. And then present some kind of alternative or solution or good guy in the drama that is confronting the problem. And that’s the most effective propaganda.

 

But even still, you don’t even necessarily need that whole good guy narrative to have effective propaganda. You can just have a really good demonisation of a particular enemy, and you’re already halfway there.

 

And so, yeah, it might seem distasteful or unChristian or immoral to some people, but this is just simply how the human psyche works. You need to identify a target to hate, and you need to focus hate, revulsion, disgust on that target. That’s just how the human psyche works. There needs to be this threat that needs to be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s being done to you. It’s what’s being done to us. They’re doing it to us. Think about it in the reverse, and look how effective it’s been. You can die happy, too. When you were referring to that sense of belonging and having a government, a leadership administration, which, you know, is administering the country for the purposes of keeping you relatively safe and ensuring that people get stronger and healthier and also protected from external threats, you can die happy if, you know, that’s happening. You can die happy. I could die happy. I said this to a friend the other day. I said I could die happy if I knew my family was relatively safe and my extended community. Other Australians were getting stronger and more beautiful generally. We were getting smarter, stronger, better. If I could see genetic improvements in my extended community, I could die happy. Couldn’t you?

 

You know, it’s kind of the ultimate meaning of life, when you think about it. I mean, none of us truly understand why we’re here or whether anything happens after death. We’re all not really sure. We only have theories. All we can say for sure is that people who die seldom report back. We don’t hear from them. So it’s reasonable to assume that whatever happens after death is not connected to this realm now.

 

And so we’re nothing in complete understanding. We don’t have a complete understanding of why we’re here.

 

But the most basic meaning that I can identify is improving the species. It’s a physical realm. It’s a physical plane. Everything is material here, except whatever it is that’s spurring us on and making us think the way we do. But I’ve said it before, and it’s actually paraphrasing Mein Kampf. Every defeat that your community suffers, our community suffers, every frustration, every failure. It’s only a setback in the grand scheme of things. So long as we protect our race, our racial. Our racial lineage needs to be protected so that we can, as they say, live to fight another day. Once your race is destroyed, you never get it back.

 

So that is the greatest meaning to life in this world, I think, is to protect and advance, develop, that is to say, improve our racial stock. If we lose it, we don’t get it back. We can lose a war. As long as the race stays, we’re fine. We can suffer all this mass immigration. As long as we protect ourselves as a race, we’ll be fine in the long run because we can fight back later. Like, we just have to protect the race while we’re under siege. Everything can be turned into a victory later. So long as the race is kept pure, as pure as possible. And, yeah, that’s where I find the most meaning in this realm. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Definitely! I mean, race is the form of life that you are. And if we go all the way back to the creation myth at the beginning of the Bible when God finished creating the world, he saw it and he said it was good. You know, nature is beautiful. The hand of God has created this incredible vast. You know, when you think about how big spaces. I know the flat Earthers are going to freak out at me, but you think about how vast spaces and the incredible images that you have of faraway galaxies and so on, it truly is incredible that existence is what it is.

 

I mean, just the fact that anything exists at all is a miracle when you really think about it. But the incredible majesty of its expanse and the intricacy as well. Just how complex everything is when you really break it down scientifically and go in the macro or the micro, it really is incredible!

 

And then when we look around, though, of all the known world, really, the human is still, in my opinion, the most interesting thing that exists that I’m aware of in the material realm. And then within the human, the Aryan race is the most interesting type of human that exists. I think that hands down, I mean, our story is the most interesting story. Our achievements are the most incredible achievements. We are the most interesting existentially, you know, from a romantic perspective and of course I’m biased, but nevertheless, that’s how I say we’re the most beautiful to look at. I think we’re the most. We have the most geniuses.

 

Blair Cottrell: Greatest, also greatest ability to imagine. We have the greatest ability to imagine which our most deadliest enemy, our most deadly enemy. They’ve worked that out and they’ve discovered how to use it against us. Because many of us are imagining a reality which is not real. The reality of human equality. You see, previously, our imagination has worked to our advantage because it’s produced great creativity and higher level of civilisation.

 

But now it’s being used against us, I think.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but nevertheless, the point is that the particular form of life that we are is something so precious. And you are kind of tasked. You’ve been given this form of life to embody it as a part of it. You’ve kind of been tasked with stewardship by God over the form of life that you are to, basically achieve its full potential. And that full potential you can realise somewhat in your own life, but it’s ultimately realised through the intergenerational development of the race, of the bloodline that you are participating in.

 

And that’s why people are so self sacrificial when it comes to their own children. Because there’s this innate sense within us that we are part of this grander process than just us as individuals. That we transcend the limitations of our individuality through the blood. And when you, a nation, is a community of blood, we all have the same ancestors. And if we stay together on a long enough timeline, our blood will probably mix again down the, down the ages.

 

And so we’re one big family kind of fighting in this kind of against nature in a certain sense, as a part of nature, to overcome its challenges and evolve and progress and develop. And it’s a beautiful thing. It really is. It’s an absolute enamours me. It gives me so much meaning in my life.

 

And so, to me, this is really what it’s all about. And the hatred that you feel to bring it back to the subject matter towards the pajeet, is what the pajeet represents, is when all that falls apart, when an Aryan people set up a civilisation and the caste system collapses and all their blood gets mixed with these inferior races, and you get this racial chaos and descent into depravity and lower stock, lower breeding, and you can see that what can come of the human race if you lose, because what it means to be Aryan, the word Aryan, it means honourable. It means noble when the blood loses its honour, when it loses its nobility, and becomes mixed down with the lower races, with the lower human types. And we see where culture goes. We see what becomes of a people in that state. And it’s disgusting! It’s literally disgusting! And that disgust that you feel, that revulsion, that’s what Nietzsche called the “pathos of distance”. That’s your inner nobility recognizing that’s a form of life I don’t want to become. I don’t want my children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and so on becoming that is horrifying!

 

And so we need to maintain distance from that. We need to separate ourselves from that so that we don’t become that. Because if we get flooded with all of these jeets and they take over everything, and we get sectioned off and we’ll get down bred, and we’ll all be turned into pajeets on a long enough timeline, if the current political paradigm is allowed to perpetuate itself, that’s what it is. It’s global, basically. Global. India is the jewish, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you imagine if God came back? You imagine if God was just off doing something, or if you’re a Christian, the second coming of Christ Jesus comes back and the whole planet is just Indians, what would his reaction be? He’d be like:

 

“Oh, I was wrong. I was wrong. They can’t be saved. They can’t be saved. Burn it. Burn it all. Brimstone. Fire and brimstone. Let’s get rid of it.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s already horrifying enough to realise that the there’s more Indians in the world than White people already in total.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are a global minority. Whites are a global minority, and a pretty disadvantaged and oppressed one, considering that we’re the only ethnic group on the planet that’s not really morally or socially permitted to recognise itself as an ethnic group.

 

But you mentioned nature like that. We’re fighting against nature. I think you would agree that I see nature as, like, a necessary opponent. Like, it gives you the necessary trials in order to keep you strong genetically and physically in your own life. But, it’s a good opponent because it’s not actually trying to genocide you, like our other opponents. Nature’s not trying to kill off our entire race. Like, consciously. Nature’s more of an unconscious force of trials that tests you and makes sure you’re worthy of being here.

 

So that’s my preferred opponent. And I feel I have a strong connection and connection with an understanding of nature. I do really appreciate. The natural world can be quite, quite cruel. Nature can be the ultimate fascist. But I appreciate it for that reason.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think in many ways, this is what the jew is almost like this manifestation of nature as a kind of test of the Aryan that we have to overcome. Like, in order to overcome.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a pretty rough test. It’s a high level test. That one’s like the final boss, maybe.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s like a woman is like, if a woman is of high quality, she will kind of test men to see can they pass her test to become worthy of breeding. Like, are they able to meet all of these criteria that makes her feel. Yeah, they do that.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, you conflate the existence of the jewish people with that, actually, because that’s what Hitler suggests in Mein Kampf, and he suggests that that’s why they’re considered the chosen people, because they were chosen by God to test everybody else.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, definitely! There seemed to be a certain dynamic like, that going on, and jews are kind of like an anti-race. They’re not really a race because they’re mixed with so many other races. They don’t actually have any pure identity. They’re this hodgepodge.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that true? Because there’s two separate types of jews. I know, Sephardic and Ashkenazi. And I do recognise ethnic traits in the Ashkenazi jews, which are the ones presiding primarily in Europe or previously have lived in Europe and hailed from European states, nations. Well, not nations, countries. They’re not of the European stock. Not necessarily, but they are kind of blended in, as you suggested. But recognise ethnic qualities as you probably can too. But what you’re suggesting is there’s no example of an actually pure jewish person. Is that what you mean?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, it depends on, like, what theories you have about the origin of the hebrew peoples. I don’t really want to get into that, but the genetic fact or not in this stream, there’ll be a topic for another day, because that’s the whole show on itself. But the jew in his current manifestation the Ashkenazi jew, is literally half European, half semitic, or half Aryan half semitic. In, like, genetic modeling, you can just see it kind of plot between Levantine and southern European populations in particular. But and they look like that as well.

 

So, yeah, the jew is not a pure type.

 

And also, look at the history of Israel. It’s constantly getting conquered by all these surrounding empires, and it’s constantly changes in who’s running it, and brutal conquests by the Babylonians and the Assyrians.

 

And then the Greeks take it over, the Persians are running it at one point, the Romans are in charge. In the meantime, they mix with surrounding groups as well.

 

So, yeah, it’s the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re much the same. We’re much the same. I mean, I’m not pure. I’m not a pure expression of an Aryan or northern European. I mean, I’m a result of intermixture to a certain extent. But within the European nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s within the European nations. Yeah.

 

So that’s a bit. That’s a bit different. Like, within the like, there’s also gradations within the race. Like, we used to have more distinct castes, and now the casts have blended through interbreeding because caste specific breeding hasn’t occurred. And that’s one of the tasks that we will have once we basically regain political power, is to try and breed the caste back into distinction from one another through identifying who has more traits, like, what predominant caste traits people have, and then bringing them together.

 

And then eventually the blood will then repurify into, like, more specific castes.

 

But, yeah, we’re all kind of mixed in that respect. And the caste system itself, there were, like, different ancestral populations that are all European, that mixed in different ratios now to constitute the distinctions between different European populations.

 

But yeah, that’s at least within one race.

 

Whereas the jews are then mixed across, like, different racial groups, and the semitic people themselves are racially mixed people. They aren’t really a pure race either. That whole Middle Eastern to subcontinent area is just like a genetic quagmire of all these different groups mixed together.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what do you think, Joel, of the theory that we were the original jews? By we, I mean, sort of like light featured, light hair, blonde eyes. Sorry, blonde hair, blue eyes. People from northern Europe, we were the original jews, and our identity was stolen from us. And by a khazarian empire, I think they called it. Have you seen all that stuff? What do you think about that?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think the Khazarian, the Khazarian theory I’m not well versed upon, but that I’m not so sure about.

 

But the idea that the original Israelites or Hebrews were Aryan and that over time they became mixed bread I think, has a lot going for it. That’s a very interesting theory, something that I’m still researching because it’s very difficult as well. When you go back before the if you go back too many you go back to like 3,000 years ago, it’s hard to find evidence for a lot of things so you’re really trying to piece together fragments.

 

And obviously this is politically disputed as well. And the jews or the modern day state of Israel wants to perpetuate a certain narrative and myth about history and they’re actually in control of a lot of the archaeological sites and so on.

 

So it’s very complicated. But the long and short of it is, yeah, I do think that there is some evidence that the original Hebrews had more White traits, you know, some reports, not necessarily blonde, but like ginger hair and lighter eyes and so on, obviously.

 

And then they were being conquered by Babylonians and mixed with the Edomites after the Maccabean revolt and so on and so then they could have gained traits from the surrounding semitic peoples over time and became a kind of hybrid semitic race over time.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I wonder if there’s any value in learning Hebrew. Would you learn Hebrew?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, I got high priority.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it even possible? Would they have they got like the actual Hebrew as a protected language? Perhaps certain people.

 

And then the one that they allow other people to learn is like a bastardized.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The modern day so-called Hebrew language that they have in modern day Israel is actually Aramaic, which is a completely different language and has a completely different script.

 

If you look at the records of like the ancient original Hebrew language prior to in the oldest kind of records that we have, it actually looks a lot like Greek or some European script. I think obviously it derives from the Phoenician language, so that’s probably why.

 

But yeah, that’s quite interesting, all of that stuff.

 

But it’s a bit of a deviation, I feel like going down that trajectory. I mean, unless you really want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all right, we can keep it local. I’ve just personally been thinking about learning another language. Not necessarily because I want to know the language. As much as I want to enhance my capacity for remembering and also expressing myself, I think the more words you know, too, that cover a broad range of different meanings. And that’s especially possible if you’re going to know multiple languages. You can think better, you can process information better, because you have more words to understand things, to use to understand things.

 

And I think I’ve really wasted time by not learning another language up until this point in my life. I’m just not really sure how to go about it. I know that there’s these phone applications now, and you can spend, 200 minutes a day doing something and you get points and all that sort of stuff, but I’m not really sure if that would effectively teach me a language. I could give it a go. I just don’t want to dump much time into something that’s not going to produce the result that I want. And the result that I want, as I explained, is I want to know more words in another language as well, preferably a language which has more words than English words, and maybe even a language that with a different Alphabet to English.

 

So I don’t get confused. I’d like to learn an entirely new, entirely new Alphabet, which was why I was considering Hebrew. Greek might also be interesting. I think Greek would be particularly challenging, actually.

 

But, yeah, I’m fascinated by language.

 

Joel Davis: I would say that if you want to learn another language, you would want to pick a language where there’s something written in that language that you want to read in the original.

 

And so then you have an actual task that’s motivating you and contextualizing the process rather than learning it just for the sake of it.

 

So if you wanted to learn ancient Greek because you wanted to read Plato in the original Greek and the Septuagint or something, you wanted to read, like, texts written in ancient Greek and understand, be able to translate them into English yourself for your own edification or for me, when I was reading a lot of German and French philosophy, I started picking up a lot of German and French terms.

 

And I thought about it would be really good to learn German completely properly and then read German philosophy in the original German. That would be really interesting.

 

But then also you would want, if you want to learn how to speak it well, you’d want people in your life that speak that language to talk to you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Otherwise, how do you know, exactly, like, how do you know, that you’re pronouncing a word correctly? I mean, I even do that in English. I pronounce words incorrectly all the time because I’ve been reading and learning them. But people don’t use those words in conversation in present day society, and so I’m mispronouncing English all the time.

 

Of course I’m going to do that to a much greater extent if I’m learning a new language. And I don’t know anyone who’s also speaking that language.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be a lot easier as well, if you lived in a country where everyone speaks that language. Like, you’d be able to learn German a lot faster if you lived in Germany than if you’re in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to. You have to. It’s like if you have to your friend just got shot in the leg, and you’ve got to get in a manual car and drive him to a hospital, but you don’t know how to drive manual. You kind of have to drive manual. And so by the time you get to the hospital, you learnt how to drive manual. It’s kind of like that living in a foreign country where you have to learn a language in order to gain access to basic goods and services. Right.

 

And on the subject of goods and services, I’m really exhausted by the incompetence of the basic person.

 

I mean, I won’t go through all the details, but I’m talking about hairdressers, fast food restaurants, you know, supermarket employees. Has anyone else noticed how bad everyone is at just performing basic jobs, resulting in exchange of services like the Internet and social media, whatever it is, has just destroyed people’s communicative capacity? People are terrible at their jobs. They’re terrible at speaking to you and I had a really bad day today. Well, the first half of the day, as a result of just communication breakdowns and me literally having to explain to people in certain industries how to do their job so they could produce a certain service or product? For me, it’s just exhausting. Mandy, I feel like.

 

I don’t know if you feel the same, Joel. Do you feel like you produce your own energy, but almost no one else in society does? They just take it from you. It’s like some people take energy, and some people produce energy, and I feel like I don’t take and I don’t want to take anyone else’s energy because I’m producing plenty of my own. But I get really tired. I get exhausted when I’m out of my home for too long because people are just draining me. It’s just general incompetence. I suppose that’s my complaint with people in society. Is anyone else noticing this? Let me know in the comments, because I need to feel like someone’s backing me up here.

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely! I experienced the same thing. I think it’s partly due to the fact that mass immigration, White people just have higher standards.

 

And even though a lot of the time you deal with White people in these jobs, they’re working in an environment that has now become mixed.

 

And as a result of that, like, standards in general drop and competency in general with training people and across the board, everything just kind of falls. The less White people. As soon as you like. Yeah. Dilute a workplace with non-Whites.

 

Also, I think for low income roles, it’s like, I think people struggle to really get motivated for $25 an hour or something to really care, because that’s worth nothing these days. Like, you really, you’re barely able to survive if you’re working a minimum wage job, so why would you be putting your heart and soul into its not a very dignified existence.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s fair enough, though.

 

But I’m talking about hairdressers. I went into a barber because I’ve been trimming my facial hair at home. But the trimmers, whatever they’re called, that I’ve been using, they’ve been giving me rash. So I thought I’ll throw them out and get some new ones later, but for now, I’ll just go to a barber and get my beard trims. And it was such an ordeal, man. It was such a pain in the fucking arse just to get my beard trimmed. I had to wait almost an hour.

 

And then when I finally did get into one of the barbers chairs, I just got some woman hairdresser working in a barbershop who clearly had never actually cut facial hair before and wasn’t confident to do it, but gave it a crack nonetheless. And I won’t go into all the details, but it was just, it was very frustrating. And I’m thinking to myself, and I tried, like, two different barbers as well, but at the other one, there was only one person working, and there was just too many people waiting there. I would have been there for over an hour.

 

And this is the first thing in the morning, too. Like, before I started work, I thought, you know, I’ll get into a barber quickly, it won’t take too long, and then I’ll be able to go to work. But I go to the local barber, I suppose this is population density problem or an illustration of that? It’s just about to open. Two minutes away from opening and there’s like almost ten people waiting at the front. They’ve all got the same idea I’ve got. I suppose they just want to get in there before their day starts. But it never used to be this way. It never used to be this way. Not even five years ago.

 

Everyone’s running away, Joel, because all these people I’m talking about, they’re White people waiting at the front of the barber in my area. They’re White. All the people that are sort of clustering up in this suburb, majority of them are White, but they didn’t live here before. They used to live in other areas which are now either unaffordable or completely inundated with migrants.

 

And so they’ve run down to the southeast where I live because it’s one of the last livable areas that’s still relatively Australian.

 

And I’m really feeling it. I got to say, I’m really feeling the absurd population density, the sudden increase. It’s kind of hit industry too.

 

I saw an interesting little propaganda video that I shared on my Telegram. You can find it on my main Telegram channel.

 

And I’m really glad I found the channel that it’s from, the channel I shared it from because it’s got all of these historical propaganda posters from various different wars and episodes in countries around the world throughout history.

 

And I’m really interested not just in language but in propaganda depictions, old and new. And in this particular video, I think it was produced by the National Party in New Zealand in 1975, if I remember my details correctly.

 

Basically New Zealand at that point was facing the same problems Melbourne is now. Actually, it’s much worse because the numbers are much worse in our situation. Numbers of immigrants. But the amount of immigrants coming in, there’s too many at once. There’s not enough housing.

 

And so the price of housing has soared to egregiously high levels. And it goes through the consequences of what happens after that. There ends up not being enough schools or hospitals as well. And pretty soon there’s not enough jobs. Then crime goes through the roof, there’s hostility between the people, there’s discontent and you basically end up with a crisis. And the way that the New Zealand government solved that crisis was moving everyone into the city in cheap little apartments. And now 90% of New Zealand’s population, or even more than that, I think it’s like 93% lives in the city in the major city in the northern part, I think that is.

 

And so I suppose down here in Melbourne they might try to do the same thing.

 

But I think they’ll probably set up more little satellite cities around Melbourne. They may try to make one out of Frankston. I know that basically every traditional residential block in the southeast where I live is now subdivided. If it can be subdivided, it will be subdivided and units will be built on it. So what previously was one family home is now between three and five small one bedroom or two bedroom apartments, like, very tight built close together. And I suppose that’s the solution that the state’s going to come up with in our case.

 

But, yeah, I’m actually at a loss to remember the point that I began with but if you want to watch that video, watch that video on my Telegram and follow the channel, too, I’ll go to it now. The channel is on Telegram. Propaganda posters. It’s literally called propaganda posters. He’s got a Reddit channel as well.

 

But, yeah, I’m really glad I found it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So a couple other stories I guess we should probably cover while we’re on here, because we’re supposed to cover the news. The refugee encampment that we counter-protested a couple weeks ago. Immigrant protesters clash with police in Melbourne as they block street, demanding permanent visas. So it’s funny. They’re still there. They’re still messing around, and now they’re basically unruly fighting with police. And this comes after a somewhat humourous story, in my opinion, of one of these pajeets, or I say jeet, but he’s a Tamil, meaning he’s from Sri Lanka. He self immolated. He burnt himself alive in Noble Park at the skate park or something because he couldn’t get a visa. Two weeks of protesting didn’t get his visa, and so he burnt himself alive. And they’re making this big deal out of it. Oh, this poor man, he was killed by the racist Labor government because they won’t give him a visa. I mean, and some people made the humourous remarks of you’d rather burn yourself alive than go back to your own country and so on. It’s quite humourous.

 

But, yeah, the that happened.

 

So that’s kind of energized all the communists and shit! And now they’re clashing with police.

 

So anyway, basically, they all just need to be deported. I mean, as we were correct in saying, like, that’s the easy result or the easy kind of response to this problem. These people are showing up. They’re saying Australia doesn’t exist, that the country was stolen. They don’t respect Australia as having any legitimacy and they feel entitled to live here. And now they’re disrespecting law enforcement.

 

And of course they still have the female cops down there that they had.

 

So the female cops don’t do anything. Imagine if we were out in front of a government department counter-protesting. They’d send down the riot squad, and if we didn’t leave within an hour, that’s like pepper spraying us and trying to like, get the riot shields out and start like bashing us or something. But they tolerate these people blocking off street, a street for two weeks, just camping on the side of the road. I think that’s actually legal to just decide, I’m just going to start living on the side of this road here because I feel like it.

 

Nevertheless, that’s what they’re doing. And, yeah, it’s just kind of its just kind of quite funny.

 

And I think bad optics. I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere with what they’re achieving or what they’re trying to achieve. All they’ve done is just piss a bunch of people off in the country, in the community, giving us a good opportunity to inject our propaganda. Made themselves look unsympathetic and more of the same. What do you think? Do you think it’s a bad look for him punching on with the cops?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it always is for the purposes of mass appeal.

 

There’s no reason for things to get to that extent as well, I mean, if you’re punching on with police officers, you have either failed to consider all of your other options or all of your other options have failed, which is unlikely. There’s plenty of other options and opportunities for getting the result that you want at a public protest without fighting with police. I know sometimes the police advance on you and you’ve got to do what you got to do to protect yourself, but it’s always a bad look.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t think the police are attacking these guys either. The police have been very giving them a very soft touch. I think that they’re just chimping out, basically. Um, just shows. Goes to show even more their entitlement.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is there any video, is there any video footage of the incident or.

 

Joel Davis: Um. I think there is, but I already got out of it. I just want to kind of keep going on this because this story got. Adds into it. This is from Canada. So in Canada, they’ve got protests as well, but they’re not even claiming to be refugees. They’re literally student on student visas. Because they got bad grades, apparently. Like, it’s because of racism, not because they didn’t pass the tests.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And they’re demanding permanent residency and they’re claiming that Canada is stolen land. And that, again, same thing they do here. They claim that Canada is in a legitimate country, and therefore they, Indians should be entitled to be given university degrees despite failing the exams, and they should be able to live there as long as they want.

 

Blair Cottrell: But if Canada, if it’s not a legitimate country, then why do they want to be legitimately recognised and naturalised by that country? It’s like fucking. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. So it’s stolen land and it’s not a real nation, but you want to be considered a part of and citizen of that nation at the same time. And if they say no, they’re racist. The fuck are they talking about?

 

Joel Davis: Students? Like, if you’re there as a student, so then you finish a degree to go home. Like, they expect that they just get to stay forever. But that’s not the terms of the visa. They weren’t invited in to live there forever. They were brought in. They allowed them in to go to university.

 

But you can see that they don’t actually. They’re not even passing the exams. They don’t even really care about the education. They’re just using that as a way to immigrate. And I saw that actually, the Left-wing government in Canada, because they have an election coming up, they just vowed to cancel 70,000 student visas or something and deport a bunch of Indians. And that’s obviously like a ploy to try and win votes for the next election.

 

So that’s interesting to see that the public opinion has shifted. So much of the Left-wing government is doing that, and the Left-wing government here seems to be trying to present itself in that way, too. They’re claiming that they’re going to clean up the student visa program, but if you look at the fine details, they’re not. It’s just like they’re nothing. They’ve done this a few times now where they’ve claimed to be reducing immigration or they’ve claimed to be reducing student visas, but then you look at the actual details of the policy, and it’s actually a nothing. It’s just like a way of changing the presentation of the numbers. So it seems like that’s what they’re doing, but actually the numbers stay the same. So there seems to be a recognition in both here and in Canada that this is wildly unpopular, but the people recognise that it’s contributing to the housing crisis and people are just fucking sick of pajeets. Ultimately, they might not say that explicitly, although increasingly they are more.

 

So it’s interesting to see that, yeah, that’s the kind of where the political winds are right now.

 

And there’s also this article that I wanted to discuss. I shared this. Let me pull this up. Australians increasingly care more about reducing immigration and less about climate change than two years ago. I definitely feel this, like no one is really talking about climate change anymore. Thank God, because it’s really a forced issue. I’m pretty sceptical that climate change is like, the carbon emissions are really that significant in the grand scheme of things. And it does seem contrived for political purposes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I had an old lady just approach me at a bus stop last time, or not the last time, probably about six months ago when I was up in Gold Coast. Maybe it wasn’t that long ago, I can’t remember, but some old lady just walked up to me and started talking to me about climate change and our responsibility in reversing it. And I asked her, where did you read this? Where’d you get this information from? And she said:

 

“Oh, the Guardian.”

 

And I said:

 

“Right.”

 

So, yeah, bless her heart. So some people are still spelled by it, but I definitely feel that’s not as popular as it once was.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, obviously a lot of people, it’s probably like 50-50. Like 50% of people maybe believe in it, 50% don’t, something like that. But whether you believe in it or don’t believe in it, reducing immigration would be good for climate change if you do believe in it, right? Like, if climate change is real, then you would want to stop importing people into the first world from the third world because they’ve done studies on this. When someone moves from the third world into the first world, their carbon emissions go up four or five times per capita. So every jeet that comes in is you’re quintupling their carbon footprint.

 

So if you really care about climate change, you should want to deport all the jeets back to India and really like the most egregious countries in the world for building new coal plants and increasing their carbon emissions and so on, is actually India and China and other non-Western countries. Western countries are the only ones doing anything about it. White people seem to be the only people that actually care about climate change.

 

So if you really think that this is real, the solution would be sending all the non-Whites back and then trying to de industrialise non-White countries as much as possible to reduce their carbon footprint.

 

So we should stop giving foreign aid to Africa, try and reduce the African population. We should try and like, put sanctions on India until they dismantle all of their coal power industry, basically, and power stations and shit like that!

 

And so if you really believe in climate change, I’ve got solutions, but they’re racist.

 

Blair Cottrell: But you’re being. Fixing it, you’re being too sensible. All we have to focus on is fighting racism and ending White supremacy. It all comes down to that. Joel Davis.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what’s funny. Like, I’m quite happy to just pretend climate change is real if you want, if you really want to solve it, because it’d be quite simple. Like, we could just, in Australia, we could just build a bunch of nuclear power stations. There’s no carbon emissions. We have more. The second largest amount of uranium deposits in the world would be carbon neutral in. You know, once we build them, we’ll be sweet.

 

But in the meantime, we should just send all the non-Whites back and do what I said. And I don’t think that a place like India or Pakistan would actually, or some of these countries would actually be able to recover from global sanctions and being forced to get off coal power. And we should stop selling alcohol to them, by the way, which we do. So we could really just shit can their economies. It would be best for the global environment if we just destroyed the non-developed economy, allowing more economies to develop because more development means more electricity gets used, more demand for electricity and more environmental degradation. So honestly the best thing for the environment is global eugenics, basically. It really is.

 

But anyway, Australians care less about climate change, which I think is good because it’s kind of a yeah, it’s an issue that is kind of basically, oh, we need to build more wind farms and all of this kind of nonsense! Like, they don’t want to actually solve the problem, which is if it really does exist, it would be implementing nuclear power. They come up with like some bullshit solution that they know will piss off the boomers. So then the boomers then have a good reason to vote for the Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party can, instead of talking about immigration or anything of actual consequence. And the same goes for all the other Right-wing parties. They can go on about climate change and they can have this like, stupid argument between the Left-wingers and the Right-wingers about climate change.

 

And no one’s talking about anything actually important but the fact that Australia is not fucking Australia anymore because it’s full of brown people and they’re degrading and debasing the White founding stock of this country. And look at the crime rate of all these Africans and Pacific islanders and Middle Easterners that they’re bringing in. What are we going to do about that? So I’m glad that it’s off the menu so that we can talk about real issues and immigration surging in people’s concerns.

 

So, yeah, basically people still care about things like healthcare and the economy and shit like that! But the key issue that is rising in concern is immigration. It’s gone up by 17.6% in two years. People that report, they’re concerned about it, about immigration.

 

So that shows that our kind of politics is in the ascendancy. Our concerns are in the ascendancy.

 

And obviously that’s a good thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! It’s only a matter of time, isn’t it? How long can you ignore, like, a million Indians moving in around you? You can’t really ignore it. It was always going to come to the forefront of a major issue, immigration, that is. And I suppose if the Labor Party have any sense or semblance of sense left, then they’ll probably try to incorporate some promise to stop or lower immigration.

 

But as history shows in Australian politics, not only do Australian politicians not keep their promises, they often do the opposite of what they promise they’re going to do.

 

So the Labor Party bureaucrats, they don’t even need to actually hold to their promise. If they say they’re going to reduce immigration, they just have to say they’re going to do it and then not do it. Kind of like the Liberal Party, they do that as well. It’s almost like they’re the same entity, isn’t it? It’s almost like there’s not a lot of difference between them. Like a false choice.

 

I mean, I’m being a little bit conspiratorial now. Wouldn’t want to get my bank account closed for hate speech.

 

But, yeah, it’s almost like the same people are responsible for lobbying the Liberal and Labour parties. Imagine that. That’d be crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, that’s the case. The property lobby, the business lobby, the various industries, the finance lobby, these are the main contributors to both parties. And they all want more immigration. That’s the consensus. And Bob Hawke, actually, former prime minister from the eighties, is quoted basically admitting that there is a conspiracy between the coalition and the Labor Party to avoid debating immigration. Uh, because they know immigration is so unpopular with the people that if it’s turned into a debate, it will force both sides to make concessions and cut immigration in order to maintain popularity. There’d be like a game theory runoff where if one side attacked the other’s immigration policy, they’d have to respond to regain popularity and they’d end up both being forced to start having a One Nation style immigration policy, which would actually be more popular.

 

People don’t like immigration. We’ve gone through the polls on the show many times. The vast majority of Australians don’t think we need any more people. They don’t think that we need to bring in immigrants. They don’t want. They want immigration cut.

 

So, yeah, immigration is not popular and they know it, so that’s why they don’t debate it. Or they’ll make the debate about something like illegal immigrants, like boat people, or they’ll make it about these little side issues sometimes, but that’s the full extent of it. The other, one other big story this week was that Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, he got sucked. He got, like sucked into going to France to meet some Instagram ho.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if that’s the truth!

 

Joel Davis: That is them out together?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, I don’t know if that’s. There’s different rumours. Like, the first rumour that spread about was that he’d been spending at least a few weeks with a girl from Instagram. And that girl had been posting selfies with him, including geolocations to her Instagram channel. And they’d been traveling to various different exotic locations. Because Durov does not want for money. He seems to have made a bit of money through Telegram and usually businessmen, they have more than one venture going on.

 

So I’m not really sure what he’s into exactly. But he makes money.

 

So apparently the girl, the Instagram girl, was with him when he flew to France. So she was in his jethe. She went there with him. And it’s speculated upon that perhaps either due to her naivety, her stupidity, or maybe deliberate mal intense, she was responsible for him being arrested by French authorities because they were either tracking him through watching her movements or she was working for them directly. I think the first situation is more likely.

 

But then there’s another rumour that Macron invited him to France. France, which I don’t know. I haven’t seen much weight behind that one. But apparently it’s true to Macron’s style, apparently Macron invited him for some sort of I don’t know, how would you describe it? Some sort of assembly. They were going to have dinner or something, and there was going to be other people there.

 

But it was a ruse just to get him to come to France so he could be arrested. It’s common knowledge apparently, that the French government, French authorities, they’ve wanted to arrest Durov for a while. While they don’t like Telegram there, and Durov is, I think, a dual citizen, French citizen and also Russian. Is that right, Joel? Is he a Russian citizen? I think he is, I think, so long as he remained in Russia and his Telegram servers remained in Russia, there was nothing the French government could do about it. There’s nothing any European nation state could do about it.

 

Joel Davis: Based in Russia. I think he bases it in more neutral countries, maybe.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. Yeah, see, that goes to show I don’t actually know. All I know is those are the main two rumours.

 

The first one being the Instagram girl responsible for his arrest.

 

And the second being he was responding to an invitation by someone in Macron’s office directly to come to France.

 

So either way, it was a mistake for him to go to France. And he’s learning that now. He was just bailed about in the last, 24 hours, and it’s 5 million Euro, his bail bond, which is equivalent to about five and a half million US dollars, according to news sources. It’s a lot of money. It’s a lot of money.

 

And I’ve always thought credit bail was funny. It’s kind of ridiculous in a way that you can buy your way out of custody. Yeah, well, you can buy your way out of custody. You’re in custody and they don’t want to let you go because if they let you go, you might skip the country and not come back.

 

And then their whole criminal case is just defunct. It’s gone.

 

But if you pay them enough money, they’ll be willing to take that risk. Because then, even if you do skip the country, well, at least they got your money. So they don’t care. So everything just comes down to money with the judiciary and justice system.

 

At the end of the day, I know that credit bail is not so popular in Australia. It’s not something you regularly hear about. It’s something that you have to specifically requests. If they’ve already denied your bail. You usually just get bail if you’re on criminal charges without having to put up any money. But it depends on who you are, obviously, if you’re Durov and you’ve got money, they’re going to try to get money out of you. The French government and the judiciary, they want some of that money. And it’s probably not in Durov’s interest to try to leave France immediately. I believe the government would expect that he would try to do that now.

 

And so he probably wants to sit tight for at least a few months until the heat dies down. He’s got to check in at a police station twice per week and remain in France. Apparently, those are his bail conditions. Checking in at a police station basically means you just have to go and sign a document saying you’re still in the country and you haven’t run away as part of a bail condition. It was imposed on me once when I was young. You have to go within a certain time, too. If you’re late, they aren’t very lenient. If you’re late to a sign in date, then they don’t like that they can breach your bail for one mishap.

 

So you’ve got to be pretty switched on with your appointments and schedule.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty alarming, though, that the moment he landed in France, he was intercepted by what I assume is a special operations group because it would have required specific intelligence of a certain type coming from a specific branch of special government to know that he was going to land in a private jet at a certain time, at a certain location. Right. That requires Intel and special operations authority group, probably mercenaries, hired mercenaries. They arrest him, they take him to jail. And the French government says it’s basically because you’re not censoring who we tell you to censor. It’s because you’re not playing ball with us. You’re providing a very popular social media platform and you’re not abiding by our censorship directives.

 

So you’re in jail now being charged with all these trumped up offences about allowing or being complicit in criminal activity. I’m sure criminal activity happens on all social media, right, Joe? Like, I’m sure drug dealers meet up.

 

Joel Davis: As a result of talking on Facebook, on Instagram.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Investigators. And then publicized it, and then it just got deleted. And no one got criminally investigated, and nothing happened to Instagram, but they were operating freely until someone, you know, publicized it in the media. Hey, there’s this pedo ring and people. You could blame Instagram for that, or you could just say:

 

“Well, you know, moderation is difficult.”

 

They managed to moderate racism. It seems like all their moderation is so focused on racism, they got no moderation left over to focus on paedophilia on a site like Instagram.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but on Telegram about that. But look, it’s a big, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s pretty free.

 

And it’s like, yeah, if you allow freedom, you know, freedom is It can be used for good or evil. You know, that’s. And that’s part of it.

 

I personally think I would much rather have free Internet where people can do nefarious activity and the authorities are responsible for prosecuting that particular nefarious activity. Because the thing is, so they get Instagram to stop people from engaging in nefarious activity. Well, they’re not going to just stop engaging in it entirely. They’re just going to find some other way to do it.

 

But really what it’s about, the French government don’t actually care about paedophilia. They don’t actually care about whatever other issues they’re trying to put on him. They care about stopping racism, they care about stopping anti-semitism. That’s what it’s really about. They don’t want any social media to be free. And that’s just very clear and obvious because Telegram, until Twitter recently, and I guess now, like Rumble, Telegram at one point was the last bastion of free speech in all social media that anyone actually uses.

 

Like, there are that smaller social media, like Gab and so on, and respect to Andrew Torber, who runs Gab, but no one’s really on GAB. You know, no one’s really on these smaller sites. But Telegram is one of the most downloaded apps in the world. In Europe, it’s more popular than in Australia or America. People use it like WhatsApp.

 

As their primary messaging a to communicate with their friends. And it’s still pretty popular in Australia and America, but it’s super popular in Europe. Everyone has Telegram. In Europe, everyone uses it. So for it to be free and for people like me and you. Yeah, I know that we’ve been, I’ve been a banned recently and Tom has been a banned. But I don’t really blame Telegram for that because that is just, I’m only banning Telegram that you download from Google Play or you download from the Apple App Store, and that’s a condition for the a being available. So that’s really, that’s really Apple and Google imposing that, not Telegram.

 

Whereas if you download Telegram directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone, but you can do it on your Android phone, then there’s no a bands.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can make you wonder, Joel, I was thinking this. It doesn’t, it doesn’t make you wonder because Durov was not following censorship directives of France or European governments. This is how he’s treated. But no one working for Apple or Google, no major shareholders or CEO’s experienced the same treatment. So could you imagine the kind of data, the personal information of users that is just regularly and routinely handed over to governments by Apple and Google? Like, governments probably just have full access to whatever they want. They’re probably looking up your nostrils half the time if they want to be, you know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Like, I know, as you probably know all about my private life. That’s why I don’t want to say say too much more, actually. I’ll keep that to myself. Yeah, a zero know all about my private life. And it sucks to, but just part of the territory. They’re all about your private life. They probably know more about us than we know about our fucking selves at this point.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t go that far. I know myself pretty well. Well, I think I do.

 

Joel Davis: But they have wonder who ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] have a sign to analyze, like, our private life. It must be kind of sad because if you did actually analyze, probably have just kind of normal guys with we’re like, we’re like humans. We’re real human beings. And it’d be hard not to be a little bit sympathetic, like, you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It doesn’t matter though, because it would go down a bureaucratic sort of pathway, so it doesn’t actually matter. It goes through so many hands that by the time a decision is made, there’s no humanity left. But they’d probably just have psychologists that sort of interpret for them, and then it moves on to someone else who does a different interpretation and it paints a picture. Identify weak points. I don’t know, man. Like, it’s an interesting thing to observe or to discuss, but I’m not exactly sure how it would work.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s pretty disgusting, though. I mean, but it is what it is. But I don’t have any control over it. I just find it disgusting and repulsive.

 

But anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. Well, it’s disgusting! You can be morally against it, but finding out everything you possibly can about what you consider to be a potential threat to you or an enemy in warfare, it’s actually just part of the game. You want as much information as you possibly can on an enemy so, you know how to approach them, when to approach them. If to approach them and, just methods of attack, etc. Etc. Like, if you know anything about warfare, gathering as much information as possible on an enemy target is just essential.

 

So I don’t know. Obviously, technology is being used to that end by certain governments and government departments against dissidents right now. Because dissidents like the government, the government is at war with dissidents when you think about it.

 

Joel Davis: But in a way, I think it might potentially be a good thing because if there’s anyone at the Australian intelligence services who isn’t like a total ideological retard, and they would know the truth about us and they analyzed us extensively, they would realise that we’re actually patriots, that we’re actually noble figures with morals, that we are not reckless, we’re not terrorists, we’re not bad guys.

 

Blair Cottrell: That.

 

Joel Davis: We actually aren’t a threat.

 

Whereas when they’re analyzing all the other freaks that they’re looking into, they would find the complete opposite when they’re looking into the Islamic terrorists or whatever, when they’re analyzing all these operations by the Indians and the Chinese and so on to infiltrate our government that they’ve uncovered.

 

And then they would analyze us and they’d see us talking about all the threats that they identify, like, yes, we shouldn’t have Indians. We shouldn’t have Chinese. Look, what is the Chinese government doing? Look at what the jews are doing. Look at what the Muslims are doing. And Asia would be like, these guys are right. Like, this is, everything else that we are researching is literally the stuff that they’re concerned about. That’s kind of crazy!

 

So maybe ASIO would realise, like, wait a second, why are we looking at these guys so hard?

 

And I actually might explain why when they had Mike Burgess, the director of ASIO, before the Senate inquiry recently, and they were asking him questions about us, he did, honestly, he didn’t seem too bothered by us, didn’t want to go into too extensive detail. Obviously, he has to put on a show for the jews and the Leftist. Like, he’s very concerned about Right-wing terrorism and they’re looking into it and they’ve got their eye on us. But he would know that we’re not going to commit terrorist acts. He would know that we’re actually patriotic forces. We just want to participate in liberal democracy like everybody else, and that we’re actually quite reasonable and rational. And the threats that we’ve identified are actually reasonable and rational threats.

 

And ultimately, these people are getting upset because we’re exercising our free, our rights to freedom of political expression and organising, which every Australian is supposed to be entitled to have under liberal democracy. And he probably is kind of sick and tired of these communists and jews constantly pressuring him to waste his time and energy making reports about us going to the park and kickboxing each other or messaging each other funny racist memes or something, and wants to actually focus upon real counter espionage against Australia’s actual enemies.

 

So he kind of had that attitude of like why am I here? Almost like, this is fucking retarded! But going through the motions. I thought that was interesting and that sent an inquiry. It was like, they were making a lot of really, like, basic errors in their analysis of us. It was like a bunch of low IQ retards that put in barely any effort, were the ones that were researching us and put together the reports. They were getting really, like, basic details wrong in their discussion of us. And it was a lot of waffle. I listened to a substantial portion of it, so I found that interesting as well. It’s like they don’t actually have very competent public facing researchers that are writing these reports about us.

 

I feel like ASIO would probably have a more competent team behind the scenes that’s creating their internal reporting. And I would imagine their internal reporting is vastly different than the stuff that gets reported in the media, which is probably why, even though counter-terrorism, which is a different part of the government than ASIO, counter-terrorism seems very focused upon trying to disrupt our organising and slow our growth and spook people out from associating. Why ASIO has said “we’re awful, but lawful” and haven’t prescribed us as a terrorist organisation and a kind of letting us cook. To a certain extent, I would anticipate that’s probably why. Because they actually have the information and maybe the competency to realise that the way that we’re presented in the media is a load of bullshit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they’re bound by certain. These agencies are bound by certain laws and procedures as well. They can’t just do whatever they want. If you’re not actually advocating for violence, you’re not engaging in or planning violence. There’s really not a lot they can do they can just kind of observe and make reports, because I think there’s too much energy is spent on all of these little ideological groups. When I think government agencies, intelligence agencies, I think would be their resources would be better used focusing on state based threats, like, meaning foreign interference is actually the result of another country trying to interfere with ours. You know, that’s where I think, huh?

 

Joel Davis: That’s what it’s supposed to be for. That’s why it was created.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! But we’ve, ever since the War on Terror and the idea of, like little terrorist cells and ideological extremism kind of sprung from that. And now our intelligence departments are busy chasing ghosts. All these little, like so-called ideological extremist, homegrown terrorists, as they call you know, radicals and so forth, you know, which are really just young kids who are just shitposting on the Internet. And all these resources get wasted on that while real state based threats are active in the country at high levels of government and institutions.

 

So, like I said:

 

“I think intelligence.”

 

Joel Davis: We would like to be running the government. We would like to be in political power, and that would be our ultimate aspiration. But we’re proud Australians. Like, we just want to serve our nation and its interests. That’s completely different than a foreign actor, foreign state actor on behalf of the Chinese government or even the Indian government trying to steal, you know, state secrets or compromised politicians or what Israel does, where Israel is a foreign state and it basically owns elements of our media, elements of our political establishment, or the threat of Islamic terrorism, where these are outsiders with a completely hostile culture, hostile religion, hostile everything who want to commit acts of terrorism to destabilise and ultimately destroy Australian society. And just cause. Just hurt people for the sake of it and this kind of thing.

 

So we’re completely different. They shouldn’t even have a file on us. Like, according to the reason why they exist, obviously, they are kind of compelled to by the current political paradigm.

 

But anyway, I think on some level, some of them would probably realise that is all I’m saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the problem with that is just to wrap that subject up, I would assume it happens in intelligence departments because it happens with police and prison officers. They shuffle around stuff. So they’ll put you on something and then they’ll take you off it and put you somewhere else so you don’t develop too much familiarity or sympathy for anyone you’re dealing with in that area.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, you know, so, you know, reported on this that the people that they put on to research Right-wing extremism, which would mean literally us and our friends, that they have to cycle them out every six or eight months or something and then put them through a de-radicalisation program.

 

Because if you spend six to eight months watching us. And you’re not like, a fat communist, or a jew or something. If you’re just a normal White person and you’re watching us, you’d be like:

 

“Fuck! These cunts actually make sense!”

 

Because we’re the ones that actually do make the most sense in all of Australian politics.

 

And so they have to put them through, like, a brainwashing programme to deprogram from them, from realizing that we’re actually right about pretty much everything!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I think it’s a pretty common. It’s a pretty common process with various agencies just to avoid that familiarity. Like, I’ve been through my stories in jail, how they would take prison officers and put them in our particular unit for three to four weeks, but then they would move them either to a different unit or even a different prison, if it was a prison owned by the same, or organised by the same administration, because we have some privately owned jails in Australia, and then we wouldn’t see those prison officers again for months.

 

So the idea was that as long as you’re not too familiar with, you don’t know the people you’re supposed to be watching or dealing with too well, then you pay more attention. You don’t miss as much.

 

So it’s kind of common sense as well. So I understand why it’s done.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty funny that the Right. The drag programs, I can understand why that would happen. Is there any other news for this week? Have you noticed the wind? Have you noticed the wind? The wind?

 

Joel Davis: A gale outside.

 

Blair Cottrell: Been so windy the last few days. Part of my fence just blew apart, like, pieces of my fence everywhere. So I had to go out there and reinforce it with chains and stuff. I don’t know where it came from either. It hasn’t been as windy in ages, but crazy gale force winds down here in southeast Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Has been pretty fucking windy.

 

Anyway, so we’re getting to the Superchats. White Power said:

 

“Thank you, sir. We love the White people!”

 

Obviously a reference to discourse. Ukrainian Groyper said:

 

“Talking to an Indian at service support is a gateway to racism.”

 

And it’s obviously very true. Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indians, you know, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that? Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I was just watching something else. What did you say?

 

Joel Davis: Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indian, like, workers on the phone, like, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, nothing really amusing. This one thing comes to mind. Years and years ago, I used to play, like, Warcraft on this private server. And they offered these in game currency things, and I bought, like, $15 worth because I really wanted something in the game. Don’t worry, I don’t play games anymore. As I’m past this now, this is when I was younger, and it was some sketchy website, though. And I used my debit card to buy it, and I got it. Like, I got the in game currency that I was trying to purchase.

 

But then some hold got put on my account. My card wouldn’t work, and I got a phone call the next day from someone working at the bank. And it was an Indian guy. It was really hard to understand, but he seemed really distressed, and he seemed convinced that I’d been scammed. And I was trying to tell him:

 

“No. Like, I decided to make this purchase online. Like, I bought some tokens for a game. It’s fine, you can open my account again.”

 

But he wouldn’t believe me. And he’s like:

 

“Show me the website. Like, what website did you go to? What was it called? You know, they shouldn’t be taking money from your account.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Bro, calm down. Listen.”

 

And then when he finally understood, he was just like, I’m just like, look, I bought tokens, and I got the tokens. Are you sure you got the Tokens? And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, I got the tokens, bro. It’s all good.”

 

He’s just like:

 

“Okay.”

 

But stuff that’s probably not that funny. But I don’t know, man. It’s not. There’s not really often amusing stories when it comes to dealing with Indians in public service, private sector, on the phone, rideshare services, it’s never amusing. It’s always just really frustrating. The smell of cigarettes, that accent, and the constant talking in a language that just does not sound very appealing to listen to. Obnoxiousness, inconsideration, arrogance. These are the words that come to mind when I think of dealing with Indian people.

 

Joel Davis: So where are you from? We are from India.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, great!

 

Joel Davis: That’s wonderful!

 

Thank you very much.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all I need to. Bob.

 

Joel Davis: No, I just found that funny. Even Trump’s landing to the pajeets.

 

But, yeah, I basically don’t answer the phone when it’s a number that I don’t know.

 

So I don’t really have any stories of talking to Indians on the phone because I seldom really talk to anyone on the phone except for my friends. That’s probably why I have no stories of getting a call from the intelligence services. Maybe they’ve tried to call me, I just haven’t picked up the phone. There’s no point.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have they actually have they actually never rang you? Because almost everyone gets a call eventually.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I would not have answered the phone. That’s the thing. Like, I don’t answer the phone and unless I know the number that’s calling me. Cause I mean, I barely wanna talk to the people I actually know, let alone people I don’t even fucking know, you know what I mean? What? Like what? Possibly if anyone needs to talk to me, they can send me a text or an email or something, you know what I mean? Leave a message.

 

But yeah, I don’t like I’m busy I got my own thing going on. I don’t wanna just like stop what I’m doing so that some random person I don’t know can tell me something like, I’m not interested. Um, Ukrainian groipe also said Indians are first incels. Do you mean they’re the first incels or. I don’t know exactly what that means.

 

But yeah, Indians obviously are like curry cells. They could be called like Indians obviously have the greatest incel characteristics because they’re the most repulsive. Southern fried 33 said phone battery at 88%. Okay, let’s go.

 

And he also said, hold the line. Fellow comrades said a good show. The G question is becoming more and more relevant, by the way. Lately people have been dropping tiny homes in backyards to avoid permits and take advantage of low rent demand, increasing density. Yeah, I have seen, I’ve seen those for rent online as well, where you can rent, you know, some tiny home in someone’s backyard. Yeah, and that’s what happens. Like when you flood the country with too many immigrants and there’s too many people to fit in in housing, then basically that’s what happens. Like you now all you can afford is to live in some shitty tiny home in some random dudes backyard because you can’t afford to have your own home. It’s pretty fucked up! GoyBoy 1488 said looking forward to the Joel slash Devon Stack collaboration, whenever that happens. He normally doesn’t have co-hosts that allow him to fully pop off. Yeah, well, I messaged him about it, he seemed keen, but he still didn’t go back to me about any of the details.

 

So maybe I shouldn’t have said anything until we actually organised something in concrete. But I sure we’ll do something at some point. And yeah, I do like his rants.

 

So that was one of my goals, was to provoke him into ranting.

 

Basically. Mr Webster said, I bet you lads have already seen the Pajeet world order documentary. Voice by the AI David Attenborough. Voice over what really made me feel that Indians need to be removed was their devastating impact on the global environment. Whites are the only race that care about endangered animal species in our planet. Yes, exactly.

 

On The Joel and Blair Show, we’re racist because, you know, we’re environmentalists. And yeah, they really are an invasive species.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s no lie. I do like the environment, love being outdoors. I like animals. So it’s no lie.

 

Joel Davis: I like animals better than jeets or yeah, pretty much most other rate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like all, you’re interested in humans generally, though, whereas I tend to be more interested in animals than I am in humans. Intuitively, I feel like I understand humans, but you have some sort of like, for you, humans provide this intrigue. Like, you’re really interested in learning about people and their ideas, whereas when I’m with a group of people, I will be the ones sitting over by himself watching birds or something like that. Like, I’ve just I lose interest in humans really quickly.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, birds are cool. I remember going through, like, a bird autism phase when I was a little kid.

 

Anyway, what else we got here? Gandalf said, how is an Eastern religion compatible with Europeans? As of now, it is not imposed upon Europeans, enforce or culturally, and we see how Europeans have come to reject it and is decreasing. Is this a sign? It is unwelcome when Europeans have the opportunity to get rid of it. Are you talking about Christianity? I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about here by Eastern religion, but if you’re talking about Christianity, which presumably is what you’re talking about, Christianity was imposed by force in some areas, but also not really in most areas. Like, it did spread pretty naturally within the Roman Empire. The late stage Roman Empire did persecute, ultimately, pagans and heretics, but Christianity had already spread organically, and they persecuted largely, like, heretical sects of Christianity, like under emperor Justinian or whatever. Christianity spread, didn’t spread by force to Britain or Ireland, France or any of these places. It kind of went there naturally. It was imposed by force upon the Scandinavian countries.

 

And then, you know, people weren’t forced to stay. Like, it’s been hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years where people weren’t forced to stay Christians, you wouldn’t get put to death for not going to church or something. And Christianity has really only started dying out in the European people in, basically the last century and recently.

 

So to me, I think you have to look more at cultural explanations rather than just seeing it in terms of imposed by force.

 

You know, I think it’s kind of like a incorrect historical analysis. You have to look at the reasons why was Christianity appealing at a certain period in history and to what groups, and why is it maybe now unappealing? You know, it’s not just down to, oh, as soon as people didn’t get put to death for not being Christians, they all became atheists. That’s not actually an accurate picture of history. Hans Rudol said, not sure if you saw my link, but did you hear about the Israeli data leak from Iranian hackers? That was leaked on Telegram. That was only days before the Telegram guy got arrested. I did hear about that.

 

And undoubtedly, the Israelis would be one of the main interest groups, or the jews, obviously, one of the main interest groups in keeping Telegram censored, because, I mean, they’re the main interest groups in keeping the whole Internet censored. And Telegram, along with Twitter, is the second most key platform for getting information out that the jews don’t want that exists. Do you? What do you think about that, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, what was the question? Sorry, I was just rereading some of the Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, no, it’s all good. It was just. He was just talking about how just a few days before Durov was arrested, there was a leak of sensitive Israeli data on Telegram by Iranians, Iranian Telegram channels.

 

And so people were speculating that there was something, you know, that had something to do with Durov being arrested.

 

But I don’t think it would have, because I think the plans to arrest him probably existed already, more than just a few days before it happened.

 

So I don’t think that was necessarily the cause.

 

But obviously, at the same time, the jews would want him arrested, I think, and would probably want Telegram censored and pressured into censoring discourse because they want a war platform censored, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why does this word come to my mind? Give me 1 second. Precarious. Precarious. Not securely held or in position. Yeah, look, there’s the right word. Even though I wasn’t sure of its definition. Durov is currently in a precarious position. Position now. Just starting to get a little bit tired. It’s been a big day, but he’s in a position that’s obviously favourable to. How would you describe them? European governments, jewish influenced governments. He’s in their field now. So he made a mistake going to France, and he’s going to have to get out of this situation somehow. I’m not sure how he’s going to do it. Like I said, he’s best to sit tight for a few months and wait, but when the time is right, he needs to get out of there and not go back.

 

Joel Davis: He ingratiated himself with the United Arab Emirates Royal Family and has become a citizen of the UAE and the United Arab Emirates, which is where Dubai and Abu Dhabi is. Their government has now put pressure on the French government because they had an order, I think, of twelve fighter jets that the French manufacturer, and they cancelled that order worth many billions of dollars. And they’re putting a lot of diplomatic pressure on the French, saying, how dare you arrest our citizen. This is improper, and so on.

 

So that might help him, because that is not. That’s kind of significant.

 

So that’s probably smart of him to ingratiate himself with the UAE.

 

Blair Cottrell: In my mind, I’m feeling like there’s something, a move he should make right now, or maybe not right now, but soon. But I need to actually sleep and think on it before I can work it out, because, like I said, he needs to get in a position more favourable to his future. Right now, he’s in a position where he can be forced to take a deal that’s not to his advantage other than the bail deal, and the deal could affect. Telegram. I hope he doesn’t do that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he just needs to get the hell out of there and not ever go back to Europe if you can. Like, you can probably just go hang out in some bullshit! I think he was already kind of hanging out in bullshit like, non-Western countries anyway, that won’t extradite him to Western countries.

 

So that’s basically probably going to have to be his life now if he wants to be Durov, the Telegram guy. I’m sure Elon Musk is sweating, too, because if they’re going to go after him, you know, would they do the same thing to Musk?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can they? What isn’t Musk in America? They can’t really do stuff like that.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, if he travels to Europe the EU has been pretty, and the British government has criticised him. Our government has criticised him in well publicized cases. So he probably feels nervous to travel to other Western countries outside of America now, to a certain extent, although arresting Elon Musk would be, like, crazy! Right? Because he’s got so allies, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think that would happen unless. That wouldn’t happen unless someone at the US State Department signed off on it or said it was okay first. Because how much influence does the US have over Europe? A fair bit.

 

Joel Davis: But say, Elon went there next week. Would they think:

 

“Oh, when Trump is in, Trump is allied with Elon, we get fucked on? Maybe now’s the time to do it.”

 

You know, there could be some kind of game. So he probably feels a little nervous, I would say he probably doesn’t feel 100% secure going to Europe right now. And the leader, the guy’s name, but the CEO of Rumble, he left Europe, I believe, got the hell out of there immediately after Durov was arrested, I guess fearing that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he didn’t actually say anything until he was gone. Musk is a bigger fish than Durov. Much bigger fish.

 

So I think maybe the French government, the EU here, they’re trying to set a precedent. They’re seeing how this goes. This is their test case. They’re going to see what Durov does next and whether or not they can actually get a conviction. If they can get a conviction, that’s a big precedent. It’s a bad precedent. So it’s all going to be very interesting. I’ll be following it closely.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s definitely important. Like, free speech on the Internet is vital for everything that we do. It’s so important that Twitter or X Telegram Rumble, these three sites in particular, are kind of protected and maintained. And I am a little bit concerned that after this election cycle, that maybe a little bit of freedom was opened up on Twitter and Rumble specifically to help fuel some kind of Right-wing sentiment that would help Trump get over the line, and that perhaps when he gets elected, they might cuck a little bit on their moderation policies because it no longer serves that temporary political advantage. I hope that I’m wrong about that, but it is a theory that many people have, which does have a little bit of sense behind it, because both the people behind Rumble and Elon Musk are supporters of Donald Trump’s election bid.

 

So that is a concern. So hopefully next year we don’t all get cucked and banned off everything again.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but Trump doesn’t really have the support of the meme as he’s not being propped up by, …

 

Joel Davis: Maybe they thought it would. It hasn’t really worked, though, because. Yeah, because Trump the culture has gone more radical. I mean, what we’re talking about tonight the most radical, the most popular thing on Twitter right now is hating Indians. Like, it’s literally the number one topic in the global Twitter discourse is how much Indian stink.

 

So, I mean, that’s hilarious!

 

But that is not what was happening in 2016. In 2016, people were making, you know, sensible arguments about how Islam, Islamic people have a propensity to commit terrorism and this kind of thing. It was much softer rhetoric back then on. And social media wasn’t as well regulated back then either, by the way. Like, you could post Nazi memes on Facebook, you could post Holocaust revisionist documentaries on YouTube and get away with it. And the censorship regime, in many respects, came in in response to the culture that was unleashed. What at first was a slightly edgy Right-wing culture, quickly mutated into what the Alt-Right became, which was full on hardcore White nationalist and pro-national socialist talking points proliferating all over the Internet. They shut that down. Then they kind of cracked things open again in the last year or two with this kind of Rumble.

 

And Twitter led counter attack against the censorship regime. And what has happened, it’s just unleashed an even stronger wave of racism back onto the Internet, where, like, Twitter is now 4chan, basically, in its level of discourse. And, yeah, will Elon Musk be able to hold that for in perpetuity? Does he actually even want to? These are open questions, but you’re right that I don’t think Trump is benefiting from it at all, because he doesn’t have that radical vibe that he had in 2016. And that’s partly because he’s a known quantity now.

 

Blair Cottrell: Even though he got. Even though he got a bullet, even though he took a bullet through his ear, he still doesn’t have the radical vibe. It’s pretty impressive. Like, it’s impressive level of normalisation he’s going for. He’s making a strong effort, I suppose, not to appear too radical despite someone trying to shoot him in the head. And I’m only narrowly surviving. It’s almost like that assassin assassination attempt is old news already. No one even cares. That’s what it feels like down here in Australia anyway. I’s like, all right, what’s next?

 

Whereas I think, you know, an assassination attempt on a US president, previously, it would have been big news for a long time, right? But politics moves so quickly now. And the average person’s dopagenic response, receptivity to information, power of remembering, it’s all much smaller.

 

And so it’s not even really a big deal to Australians that Trump almost got his head blown off. Now it’s like, if you mention it, someone will go, oh, yeah, yeah, I remember that. Yeah. But they’ll remember it as though it happened a long time ago.

 

Joel Davis: It was so hype at the time, and if you told me that in two weeks no one would give a fuck anymore, I would have said, surely not, but that’s literally what happens.

 

But you can only blame Trump. Like, he purposefully pivoted to the centre, like you said, and, yeah, made himself boring. And that was probably the strategy to beat Biden because he was kind of cruising to a victory over that assassination.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel. That was after whoever it was tried to shoot him. That was the perfect moment to pivot to a more extreme message and really push hard. And he still would have been elected, he would have been loved, he would have won over the same powers that got him into the office in the first place before Joe Biden was in. Yeah, but he kind of wasted an opportunity there. I think he listens too much to his more lukewarm advisors. He does. Or maybe he just is too tied in with certain people and he can’t afford not to follow their directives at this point. I don’t know what it is, but politics is messy, it’s complex. I just think he missed a big opportunity there.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely, 100% agree with you. And you can make the argument that the campaign this time, like the first time it was about the wall. Now he’s saying, let’s amass the port or the Mexicans. You can say that’s maybe even more radical the original time, but it feels less radical. And that’s partly because the Right-wing culture has moved on.

 

He has cucked in other areas and has a legacy when he was president and so on, of kind of cucking and failing to follow through. And the energy that was there in 2016 was this idea of, I’m going to go after the establishment, I’m going to put Clinton in the bushes and Obamas, I’m going to put them all in jail, and we’re going to lock up this corrupt establishment and America’s back, and the people actually have power again. He had that populist aura of taking on the establishment that no longer exists. Now it’s just about the policies. Oh, well, if you vote for Kamala, then you won’t get this policy or that policy. He’s just not the politician now. He’s not this kind of revolutionary figure. That was the energy of the 2016 campaign, which obviously a load of bullshit! As soon as he got in, none of that materialised. And they then went after him. They tried to lock him up. They did what he promised to do to them, to act to him.

 

And then he was like:

 

“Hey, you can’t do this!”

 

And just cucked and just showed weakness. I, that’s really the essence of why people don’t really have much energy for it, is because that kind of rebellion against the elites, that sense of people’s justice or whatever, that, like, bane from Batman energy that he had the first time is just completely gone now. And that’s the biggest loss. And, yeah, additionally, the campaign leaves a lot to be desired. They don’t, they’re not dog whistling White nationalism enough. They, if they wanted to win, they really had to energize White voters. And White people are energized, but they’re energized in a way that really doesn’t have much fuel for the Trump campaign. They’re energized just spontaneously by, like, current events, and they kind of feel politically alienated. He just seems like another conservative now.

 

And I think that’s a good thing because it shows that the Right-wing culture has progressed, it’s become more radical, it’s become more demanding that it’s not placated by a Trump anymore.

 

Blair Cottrell: But has it, in the process, though, has it become more detached from the masses?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know. I think if you look at the data out of the United States the masses are way more in support of mass deporting non-White immigrants in America. You know, they’d done a poll a few years ago on Trump voters, and they said:

 

“What’s a bigger problem, racism or anti-White discrimination?”

 

And they all, I think, like two thirds of them said anti-White discrimination.

 

So, you know, they’ve done a lot of polling to show that Trump supporters and Americans in general are more closer aligned to us on racial issues. They’re softer on other issues, like they’re more pro-abortion, they’re more pro-gay marriage, they’re less Christian. You know, all these other issues that were previously conservative issues, like the social issues associated with conservatism, the Right has lost on all of those issues. The only place where they’re actually making gains is on racial issues. That’s the only place they’re making gains. But I, you’re not seeing a pivot, really in the political establishment that is a requisite to that.

 

I mean, we’re talking about in Australia, people care more than two years ago, everyone was talking about Covid and then climate change. No one cares about that anymore. Now it’s all about immigration, now it’s all about the housing crisis and shit like that! So, like, our political issues are winning out. Like our. I think we’re having a stronger presence again online with a Twitter opening up and so on. And European politics, where they actually have populist Right-wing parties that are plugged into youth appeal and so on, you’re seeing them all do very well in the polls and in elections over there.

 

So that shows that if we had an equivalent kind of political release valve for Nativist anti-immigration sentiment here, it probably would do very well. And in America, they probably do very well as well.

 

But it’s just our systems are different in the Anglo-sphere. We don’t really quite have that.

 

I mean, even in Britain the Reform Party did very well at the last election, then they had the riots, which was, in my opinion, I’ll still say it good to see an actual response from White people in Britain when their children are attacked, because plenty of those kinds of things have happened over the last few months or over the last few years, I should say, where innocent White children have been victimized and there hasn’t been a response like that.

 

So it was good to see.

 

And then the Reform Party is now polling above the conservatives and polling close almost to the Labor Party and the Labor Party sinking in the polls.

 

So the British public is responding to those race riots by getting more Right-wing, more pro-populist.

 

And obviously, we don’t support. We don’t think that a populist Right-wing party is going to be enough of like a Pauline Hanson style or Nigel Farage style politics. But if people are going more to that kind of politics in response to a race, right, that’s a good thing. That shows that it’s a start focusing more on the Right issues. Yeah, exactly!

 

So I think we are in the ascendancy culturally, and our ideas are getting more popular. Like, back during Covid no one was really talking about immigration, no one was talking about jewish power. Now because of what’s happening with Israel and what’s happening with the housing crisis and the immigrants flooding over the border after Covid across the Anglo-sphere, now our issues are the main issues again in politics.

 

So I think, yeah, we’re definitely in an ascendancy moment meta-politically, culturally. We don’t have the organisation institutionally to implement, to translate that into a proper political manifestation, really, either here or in America properly. So that’s, I guess the next step is building a more radical kind of politics.

 

And I think here, you know, we’ve got what we’re doing and the aspiration maybe to build a political party ultimately, if we can get enough manpower and resources together to do it. In America, though, building a small, minor party doesn’t really work as well in their system.

 

So they’re going to have to get more creative. I don’t know exactly what the solution, solution would be in America, but they, I think they need to detach themselves from the Trump thing, like, whether Trump wins or loses, this is the last Trump election cycle. I think they’ll be good for the American Right to have to look beyond Trump finally and come up with something else where they have to figure out, well, I think it would be creating in America pro-White lobby groups, pro-White advocacy groups that are of, that explicitly organise White Americans around their interests, rather than trying to just use the Republican Party, which is they’ve lost control of, it’s controlled by jews, and that’s filled now with non-Whites and non-White interests, it’s totally cucked!

 

Look at how the jews control things. The jews have all these pro-jewish organisations, and then those organisations then function as pressure groups, and they fund, they lobby and they fund people, and they embed themselves in the media, and they fund think tanks and fund people to then go into media jobs, go into political jobs, they fund political campaigns, they pressure politicians.

 

And so they’re able to exert power over the system through that infrastructure. I think White Americans should be trying to build that kind of thing.

 

And then through activism, through lobbying, through these kinds of mechanisms, try and change things, rather than just simply, we got to get the Republican guy elected. Guys, everyone, just cuck to whatever the platform is of whoever’s running on the GOP ticket and try and get them into power. That doesn’t work like that. You’re giving your loyalty in exchange for nothing.

 

Meanwhile, the jews, they give their loyalty in exchange for concessions. Every other group gets concessions in exchange for loyalty because they’re organised. Whites aren’t organised. They get no concessions for their loyalty, even though they’ve got the most votes, even though they’ve got the most money. They’re just not organised.

 

So I think that’s really the next step in America. And here, as well, political parties are really the last step of the process. After you’ve got your people organised, after you’ve got money, you’ve got manpower, you’ve got some kind of functional hierarchy where you can direct manpower and resources in an intelligent and strategic way. Now you’ve got a negotiation leverage to impose yourself upon politics and be able to be influential in politics. So figuring out that kind of project of political entrepreneurship in a pro-White way, to me, that’s the next paradigm for us, rather than just thinking in this narrow way in terms of party politics.

 

So anyway, there’s a bit of a rant, by the way, you know, people, I can see people asking questions in the chat, like, directed towards me, you know, this isn’t a fucking charity you want to ask me questions, fucking pay me, you know what I mean? But I did see one person ask me about in the Cozy chat, they didn’t pay me about my milk bottle. This, like, where do you get this from? Well, I bought this from Kmart for $3. We get, we get our raw milk supply, but it comes in buckets. And then I put it in the bottle myself. I don’t buy it in the bottle because raw milk isn’t something you can buy at the shop. It’s illegal for them to sell it to you at the shop.

 

So I have to bottle it myself, basically.

 

So that’s where I get the bottles from. And, yeah, I can’t recommend raw milk enough. If you can get a supply, it is vastly superior than pasteurized milk.

 

Blair Cottrell: Completely different flavour. Rich, slightly more sweet, creamy, more dense. Completely different colour, too. Like that milk from the supermarket. That pasteurized milk, it’s unnaturally White. Milk shouldn’t be that White.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just better for you in so many ways. Like, your body just takes in the nutrients so much more easily, and you can feel that.

 

And it’s also very good for fertility, I’ve heard.

 

But, yeah, I really highly recommend it. And it’s almost, when I drink like three litres in a day of raw milk, particularly of an evening, if I really like to lug it down, it’s got like a nootropic effect, almost like I feel like my mind is full of inspiration. Inspiration. And, yeah, it’s. I don’t know, it’s almost like a quasi spiritual experience.

 

Blair Cottrell: Raw milk, guys, the choice of autists, but it’s got lactase. One of the main reasons it’s actually easier to digest and better for you is because it doesn’t go through the pasteurisation process, meaning they don’t boil the living out of it. The lactase enzyme remains in the milk, which is what your body needs to digest the lactose. Right. The milk sugars.

 

And once that lactase enzyme is destroyed through pasteurisation, the milk sugars don’t digest properly. They don’t split properly during digestion. They need to split. That’s what the lactase does. And actually, lactose free milk doesn’t exist.

 

If you look at the ingredients on lactose free milk, it’ll say milk, cow’s milk.

 

And then the lactase enzyme is re added to the milk so you can digest the lactose properly.

 

So there’s no such thing as lactose free milk. They boil the milk traditionally, if it’s going to a supermarket, destroying the lactase enzyme, making it difficult to digest. And then for people who think they’re lactose intolerant, they buy lactose free milk. It’s not lactose free. They just re added the enzyme that they destroyed in the first place.

 

So there’s some milk information for you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t really ever! I never had a problem with drinking regular milk. I still drink it when, like, I get a coffee or something like that. Um, or it’s in various other products, and it doesn’t really negatively affect me, but just raw milk is just so much higher quality like that. My body feels a lot better. You can just feel the sustenance from when you have a good steak or you have just high quality food, you just feel so much better. And raw, it’s not placebo. It definitely it definitely helps.

 

But yeah, we got more Superchats here. I got one on Entropy from the gump, who sent $14.88, which I always appreciate, and he said:

 

“Thanks for a good show. Is there any way to donate to Sewell’s house building project again?”

 

Yes, because we got de-platform from GiveSendGo on that one. We don’t actually have something set up right now, and it’s annoying because people are always asking me, how do I donate to the organisation? How do I donate to the organisation? And we need to get a new platform set up. We keep getting de-platformed, trying to set up ways to donate directly to the organisation, and we get a lot of money, I think, if we finally do. So hang tight. We’re working on it, and we’ll announce it soon when we come up with a solution. So that, yeah there’s a lot of people out there who say, I can’t really get involved because of this and that, but I’d like to help you guys out financially, obviously, we would appreciate that.

 

So, yeah, hang tight. It’s one way that that we’re not grifters, that we’re really terrible at raising money.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we always have been to. I even feel bad when I get money. Like, I don’t know if it’s a result of how I’ve been raised or if it’s a spiritual thing, but even when I’m making money and providing like a good service as I do as a personal trainer and online coach, something still feels like guilty about getting money. It doesn’t sit right with me. It’s the weirdest thing. Like I let people off all the time.

 

Joel Davis: Rather not have to deal with money, like to risk the crowd of the soul. I just want to like have my land and then all the other casts are like performing their role and then I’m just studying the great works of literature and I’ve got like my long grey beard that I’m stroking and people come to me for advice and my wisdom and I’ve been just engaging in my affairs in the palace and everything is just taken care of I don’t really need to buy or sell anything. That would be my ideal existence.

 

But obviously that’s a bit impractical at the moment, but we’re working towards it. Yeah. White power also sent another Superchat with, no, they didn’t put a caption, so I got nothing to read out. Southern fried, 33, said enjoying the show and he also said Australia has the best fauna and flora. I don’t know if I really agree with that. Like I honestly do like some of the animals they have in Europe better. Like kangaroos are kind of cool, I guess, but a lot of like emus are fucking retarde Uh, wombats are kind of cute they work. Koalas are kind of cute or whatever.

 

But we don’t have a moose, a deer, like to me that shit would be cooler. You know, lions, I know, you know, wolves, we don’t really have that kind of shit! Which to me is like, we have an eagle.

 

Blair Cottrell: Got the wedge tail eagle. The wedge style eagle is pretty cool!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, there’s some cool birds and shit, obviously, but kangaroo, we.

 

Blair Cottrell: Got the kangaroo, man. Have you seen some kangaroos? They’re jacked. Like almost any fat you can eat. Kangaroo. We have kangaroo meat for sale at the local supermarkets. It’s a strange meat. It’s a grainy meat that’s very lean. Like there’s no fat in it at all! It’s not clean by Christian standards because kangaroos have, like, paws, they don’t have hooves.

 

So I don’t know. I’ve tried it a few times. Can’t say I rate it, but it’s popular amongst bodybuilders because it’s just all protein.

 

Joel Davis: Kangaroo can be nice, but it’s very easy. It’s something that’s very easy to overcook. We used to get these kangaroo sausages that were quite nice on the barbecue.

 

But, yeah, I know that I don’t eat it that regularly. I’ve had some cool experiences with kangaroos.

 

Actually saw a few of them when I was up at the Gold Coast when we had our national meat. We first got up there, I was kind of with all these families with young kids and they wanted to go to the wildlife park.

 

So we went to the wildlife park and it was kind of nice, you know, seeing all the different animals that this, like, massive crocodile that was fucking huge. That was pretty impressive. But they had like a part where you can walk in and the kangaroos are all just chilling there and had this emu running around and I got like, a selfie with the emu and I was hanging out with some of the kangaroos, but they weren’t very. They’re pretty kind of low energy, to be honest.

 

But when I was a kid, I went to somewhere called Pambula, which is on the south coast of New South Wales. It’s near Bega and Marimbula, right near the Victorian border on the coast. There’s a big wildlife park there. I don’t know if it still exists because this was when I was a kid and it’s open and they got shitloads of kangaroos. And the kangaroos are used to humans, so you can walk up to them and pat them and stuff. They’re very friendly. And the kangaroos like it when you scratch them on the chest and they’ve got little arms like this and they just kind of go like. It’s kind of funny. Like they’re kind of retarded! They just love getting a scratch on the chest. But they got these big red kangaroos that are like fucking almost two and a half meters tall and shit! They’re massive! Pretty imposing.

 

But yeah, the kangaroos are kind of cool.

 

Obviously there’s an affinity with the kangaroo, but at the same time, I don’t know. I honestly prefer European animals. If I’m quite frank. The shogun said, hail victory, boys. Cheers. White power also said, question for Blair. How did you become so good at public speaking, especially with your previous protests back in the day? Do you mean rallies? And how did you become so articulate and well spoken, even in casual settings?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s a lot to unpack there. But what immediately comes to mind is you guys having the support of you guys, I sort of like, it just made me more passionate. It made me see that I wasn’t the only one who believed and understood what I believed and understood. And it just gave me the confidence. Just the constant support helped me to believe. Obviously, there’s more to it, and I can get into it a little bit more on another day, perhaps, because I’m a bit tired. We’ve been going for over two and a half hours now, and I’m almost ready for bed. What’s the time now?

 

Actually, yeah, we’re after 11:00 pm and I tend to be an early riser, so I’ll usually go to bed at about this time.

 

But, yeah, like. Look, I don’t feel like I am that good, especially as I’ve gotten a little bit older. I’m probably less articulate than I used to be, but, yeah, I didn’t even enjoy reading that much, to be honest. Like I said, there’s lots one pack there. I’d probably have to think about it. But I do appreciate the question, and thanks for the appreciation. I suppose.

 

Joel Davis: In my opinion, what makes you really effective at public speaking is your ability to tap into your emotional energy. And it just kind of rips through channels really effectively.

 

But also, I think, some of your best features. You were obviously applying the principles of Mein Kampf. You know, you had already kind of put a lot of thought into, how do I explain this very complex phenomenon in a way that is digestible to a normal person? And you’d obviously, like, kind of gone over that a lot in your mind.

 

And so you had your, like, core talking points and principles, so you’re able to just channel emotion into it, like a kind of aggression into a formula. And it came out very polished and very. But when people prepare what they’re going to say, you know, sometimes it can kind of seem like they’ve prepared what they’re going to say. And there’s something a little bit inauthentic about it.

 

But with you’re able to channel your emotion in such a way that it felt like it was just ripping out of you. And maybe it was to a certain extent like you prepared the ideas in your mind, but probably not the exact way of saying them. So it came out naturally. And that’s probably the key with public speaking.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s three things or three parts of the formula which are coming into my mind. Hopefully I remember them. Maybe they’re slipping from my mind. Now the first one is you have to actually believe in what you’re talking about. How should I describe that? It’s extremely potent when in your voice there is that genuine belief. Because people, ordinary people, they might be simple, but they’re not as stupid as some people think they are. They pick up on things. They’re intuitive, as we’ve said previously, people in large groups are much like a woman. They’re feminine in their instinct and nature and as a result they are intuitive.

 

So although they might not always be following you on an intellectual level, they’re feeling you and they’ll know if you’re not actually genuinely believing in what it is you’re saying. That’s why Parliamentarians are never popular with the people, because Parliamentarians don’t believe in other than their financial backers and political results. They’re not really motivated by that passionate belief in something greater. Right?

 

So you need that you need to actually believe what you’re saying and it needs to mean a lot to you.

 

Secondly, you need. You need to have confidence and not be distracted by the thought of what other people are thinking about you.

 

And the best way to do that is to understand the audience you’re speaking to being the Australian people or just regular working class, the kind of people who are going to criticise your speech, pull it apart, analyze its contents, ridicule you and laugh at it. These people are always going to exist, but they only make up a tiny percentage substrata of the people you’re actually reaching with your words. You need to not pay attention to the small conceited intellectuals at the back of the room who are sniggering at the contents of your speech. Block them out. Think not about what people are thinking of you. Think only of the effect that you’re trying to create on the crowd of the standard working class people, right?

 

So I suppose the second part of the formula in that regard would be to have that mute button from criticism. Don’t actually read the critics or pay any attention to them whatsoever because critics aren’t the masses. The masses aren’t analyzing the contents of your speech like Professors of Political Science or academics and Marxists from the universities. So you don’t need to pay them any attention. Right. They’re not your targets. The people are your targets.

 

And the third one. It may have slipped my mind. Yeah, it may have slipped my mind, but what did I. What did I just mention? Then? The first one, I’m so tired. My memory is failing me.

 

The first one was, believe in what you’re saying. Believe in what you’re saying. The second one is, know your targets. Know who you’re speaking to. And I suppose there was another one I had there as well, but it just slipped my memory. I’m sorry, but these are the these sort of things. That’s it!

 

You have to understand people. You really have to have a good intuitive understanding of people.

 

And I think these three things together, these three things together are what can contribute to making you a better than average speaker.

 

You have to remember what speaking is.

 

At the end of the day. With words we spell. All I’m doing right now is sending out vibrations that mean something to you because we’ve created what we call a language, where we’re able to decipher the meaning of these vibrations, know through receiving them in our ear canals.

 

However, words have a magical effect on people in a number of ways. They can alter a person’s perspective of reality. They can also make them feel and think differently about a certain topic or thing.

 

And so what we’re doing when we speak is we are spelling an audience. We’re actually trying to cast a spell. And that’s the only real magic which exists in addition to symbology, words, symbols, language. This is real magic. Like, I think our understanding of magic through the times have become fables and myths about actual wands and real magical spells. That doesn’t. I don’t believe that exists. I think real magic is something much more palpable and something that we actually don’t recognise as magic on a daily basis. But we’re surrounded by it all of the time. It’s basically anything which is language, which is trying to get you to feel or think in a certain way.

 

So that was besides the original point that I was pivoting from, which was just understanding people, which is not something that you can necessarily always learn. You have to have the intuitive senses. And by that, I mean you have to actually be from the people. You can’t be too far removed from the ordinary worker, which is, I suppose, where I was blessed somewhat, if you want to call it a blessing. Being a public speaker and dissident hasn’t really worked out to my personal advantage.

 

So maybe it’s not a blessing, but I’ve basically got half a normie brain, is what I’m trying to say, which is quite feminine, which allows me to tap into the feeling of people around me. Like I can walk into a room, I can make eye contact with people. I know how they’re feeling, I know what they’re thinking, sort of not word for word, but I’ve got that intuitive sense that’s necessary to understand people on an, on the level that’s required to actually influence them through the spoken word. And it’s something that I don’t know. Like I said, I don’t actually think I’m that good. I’m not as good as I could have been with the right kind of nurturing and education. So there’s, like I said, there’s a lot to unpack. It’s a subject that I’m actually quite interested in. And I did a bit of research in when I was young, but I hope I’ve been articulate in my answer to your question.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re only getting started, Blair, because politics is actually an old man’s game. We’re all quite young. We’re not anywhere near our peak as political actors.

 

Actually, you’re not supposed to really be that influential in politics in your twenties and your thirties.

 

I mean, how many politicians or political leaders can you think of that as young as us when they’re in their peak of influence? I mean, it’s very rare.

 

So we’re all just getting started, actually. A long career ahead of us. We’re kind of stuck with it now. Because once you become a White nationalist, prominent White nationalist, I mean what the fuck else are you going to do?

 

Blair Cottrell: Hitler says you shouldn’t enter into public politics until after 30. Yeah, because before they, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s probably right. Like, if I didn’t say anything and then jumped in, now, people would probably like me a lot more than all the immature shit that I’ve done up to this point.

 

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, you can’t turn back the clock, so you got to stick with it now. But it is good advice. It’s good advice, which I actually ignored because I read that advice.

 

But then I just charged into public politics at 25. I’m like, I’m not waiting five years. I saw an opportunity, I saw an opening, and I went for it, but I sort of generated a reputation.

 

But look, even though I’m generally bad PR for mainstream politicians, no one wants to really have me on their show, their television program. It’s too controversial. You know, it’s Blair Cottrell. The reputation that I did generate is still useful and really amusing in the sense or in regards to the reaction that generates from certain people. Like, you can see all these Leftists on X. Ever since I joined X again, I’ve been having some fun and just dropping comments on posts that appear in my feed here and there. And they’re all like, just arguing about something kind of lightly. And then I show up in the comments and just my name, just my name sets them off. They fall into a hysteria. I can’t believe it’s me. And they just go wild. Any guys they were sort of trying to uphold about being a humanitarian and actually just wanting to be nice and help people is suddenly just dropped. They suddenly drop it and just become absolutely vicious and resort to vicious insults.

 

So just my name has this effect on Leftists where they just like kind of lose control of themselves emotionally and reveal what they actually are, which is just hysterical morons who just actually hate White people and want to see them die. And that’s what comes to the surface just at the sight of my name or just by seeing my face. They lose their minds. And it’s really interesting the effect that I have on people in that regard, just from the reputation that I’ve made.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like left just insults online whenever I get them are always so juvenile. It’s like stuff like:

 

“Oh, your mum should have swallowed or you’re a numpty. Oh, you’re a racist. Oh, what a piece of shit you are. Oh, you, why don’t you suck my dick, you racist?”

 

Like, don’t even say suck my dick. That would be too masculine. They say even gay than that. Like it’s just like the dumbest, like most low rent insults that you’ve ever heard. It’s not even offensive.

 

Blair Cottrell: You, like you want that kind of stuff though, because it demonstrates that the people who oppose you are generally over hysterical, unintelligent morons.

 

Whereas like the way you actually, you don’t really respond to criticism at all!

 

But if you do, you respond to it sort of ironically, playfully and like it’s not bothering you that much. That’s one of the rules of politics, I suppose you could say. But the Left don’t really know how to do that. The Left fall into absolute hysterics and genuine emotionally driven hatred and it makes them look childish and ridiculous every time. And it’s one of the ways we made them so unpopular back in the days of my activism, we would lure them down.

 

Joel Davis: Whenever I talk shit about blacks online, I get all these death threats in my inbox. Like:

 

“Oh, wow, I’m getting a death threat from some black guy from America. I’m so scared!”

 

Like, what are you going to do, faggot? Like, we’re going to fly to Australia and come find where I live. Like, you have, like, 85 IQ. You won’t know where I live. No one knows where I live. But you ain’t finding me. You ain’t coming here. You can’t even have a gun here. Like, what are you gonna do, try and fight me on the street? Like, I’ll probably win? Like, you just like some dumb retard online? Like, you’re not. You’re gonna do that? You’re not gonna do anything!

 

Blair Cottrell: You just said that you do have to be careful, though, having said that, because chances are in your lifetime, someone’s gonna try to stab you, and it’s not even because of politics. It’s not even because of politics. It might just be because you were in wrong place at wrong time.

 

But if you are a White guy, your chances of being stabbed, at least, you know, someone trying to do that a few times in your lifetime, I think they’re actually significantly greater than if you were, like, an Indian or an African or maybe not. Africans are always stabbing each other, so maybe that’s a not true.

 

The point is, you got to be careful and you got to be prepared for people to kind of ambush you. I’m seeing a lot of disturbing videos circulating online, some from England, some from Europe, where people are set upon by groups of migrants, and they’re stabbed. They’re stabbed in places that could easily kill them if they don’t seek immediate medical attention.

 

And I, in my day to day life, take various proclamations just to try to avoid anyone taking advantage of me while my back is turned or while I’m unprepared, because the last thing I want is to have spent 20 years building my body up and increasing my strength, you know, taking pride in myself, only to be, like, stabbed in the back of the neck and killed in 5 seconds. I’d be so devastated by that. Well, I wouldn’t be alive to be devastated, but, you know what I’m saying? I don’t want to. I don’t want my. I don’t want all my training to go to waste. And I want to keep my wits about me for that reason.

 

So, you know, sitting, knowing the exits to where you are, sitting with your back to the wall, keeping your hands up near your face if you can, even if it’s just scratching your chin like you’re pretending to scratch your chin, just to always be semi-prepared. It’s, in my opinion, better than just hoping someone doesn’t try something. Why would you sit with your back to a door not knowing who’s going to come in if you didn’t have to do that?

 

Like if you had the choice of sitting with your back to the wall where you could see the door. It’s stuff like that to me is just common sense. But I suppose all men think about this, or should think about this. Like I said, even if you’re not in politics, even if you’re not someone who’s a known public figure or something, I think it’s just something men should do as just general precaution, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I don’t know if I ever get recognised by Leftists, because if I do, then I have the balls to actually act upon it or do anything about it. Whenever I get recognised in public, it’s always someone who’s sympathetic.

 

In my experience, you might have a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Different experience, but yeah, I’ve been recognised a few times. I’ve only been most of the time when I’m recognised.

 

And I’m not just saying this, it’s just people who want to get photos and shake my hand. There’s a lot of, there was a lot of working class support for our group and our activism back in the day. It was almost like a household name, the United Patriots Front in Australia. And after I got censored, obviously it was difficult to maintain that. It was also a very explosive sudden development. So it’s hard to keep the fire burning with that. So those sort of activist groups as well.

 

But three times I’ve been approached by someone who didn’t appreciate me. The first time was in the northern suburbs of Melbourne while I was at just a Tucker shop getting some food on a lunch break. I was working with some, with a builder, with some labourers at the time, and just an overweight guy who was in the same shop who said that the, he said the people working at the shop shouldn’t have served me because I was a Nazi. And I didn’t really make much of a fuss about it because I just wanted to eat my lunch and go back to work.

 

So that’s what I did. But the second time was interesting. I was on a train coming home from the city again, coming home from work, back to the southeast region, and there was someone on the train looking at me funny. And I sensed that he recognised me. So I kept looking generally in his direction without looking him directly in the eye. And then it’s like finally he realised who I was and he shouted from across the other side of the carriage, I know you’re that fucking racist, Blair Cottrell. And I said:

 

“Yeah, yeah, that’s me.”

 

And he was a Muslim character, a young guy, but like one of those westernised Muslims with sleeve tattoo.

 

So all the tattoos down his arm, his beard was like, trimmed really nicely. So not like a hardcore fundamentalist Muslim. Probably didn’t go to mosque or anything like that, but I don’t know, some kind of Arab dude. And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me, right? But only after I said:

 

“What did I say to him? He started insulting me first after I said:

 

“Yeah, I’m Blair Cottrell, you’re a fucking piece of shit, mate!”

 

Something like that.

 

And I said to him, all I said, this is all I said, I said:

 

“You got to be careful, mate. Just insulting people in public, you don’t know because you know, you can get your jaw broken.”

 

And he goes, are you going to break my jaw? And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me.

 

And so I just didn’t say anything after that. He kept insulting me. He walked a few paces towards me, but no closer. He was probably standing about 15 meters away. And he was bothering some of the other people on the train who were asking him to please be quiet. I was just looking out the window, ignoring him at this point. And the train driver stopped the train. The police were called. He refused to leave the carriage at first until the police came. And the police actually cuffed him and took him off the train.

 

And then when he was on the train station, outside the train, while cuffed, he claimed, he made a statement to police and claimed that I tried to start a fight with him because I was a racist. And that’s what the police officer came into the carriage and told me that he said. And the police officer said:

 

“What? What happened?”

 

And I said:

 

“No comment, mate. Just no comment. I’m just trying to get home from work. No comment.”

 

So I didn’t say anything.

 

And the only reason they let me off and didn’t kind of take me as well, the police, they didn’t take me is because just a couple of random girls, ladies coming home from work, also on the train, stood up for me. They said:

 

“No, he was just sitting there. And this other guy started filming him and swearing at him and screaming at him!”

 

And so the police took the statements from the other people on the train and left. They left me alone and I could go home. I never heard anything else about that.

 

That was the second time.

 

The third time was I was just shopping in a grocery store, local one, actually, for groceries, as one does. And someone was following me. I could sense them at first, and then I turned my head enough so I could see them. See them in the what do you call it, your peripheral vision. And, yeah, I wasn’t sure at first, but then after a while, I was pretty sure because I went down three different aisles, and he’d followed me the whole time. I got to look at the guy. He was average height, overweight, wearing a face covering.

 

But this was during the Covid sort of pandemic saga.

 

So a lot of people wearing face coverings, but his was particularly dirty bandana sort of thing. And he had a baggy, dirty T-shirt on with a picture of I think it was Tupac. But it was something like that, kind of like dreaded hair, like very dirty hair. A White guy, but not a healthy White guy. And he walked past me and I stood aside to move for him eventually because he was starting to get really close to me. And I was almost certain he was following me and I was having a bad day.

 

So this was one of those moments where I reacted the way I would usually react as I moved to let him walk past me. And I just waited until he did. It’s like he kind of realised that I knew he was following me.

 

So he gave up. And he walked right up to me with his bandana on. And he said:

 

“You better watch your back, you fascist cunt!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Fucking what, mate?”

 

So I shoved him, right, because he was right here. He was right in my face. I shoved him hard. He fell over. I took a few steps forward because he was still mouthing off at me, and I shoved him again, bounced off the shelves, and some peanut butter and glasses, like jars of jam fell on top of him. And it was at that moment I realised I shouldn’t have shoved this guy. I shouldn’t have touched him. I think the first shove was okay legally.

 

But then when I stepped forward, like, he got up again, I stepped forward and pushed him over again. And he kind of like sustained some damage by bouncing off the shelves. That’s when I realised I’m probably on camera and I shouldn’t be doing this. It was so difficult, though. All I wanted to do was just execute that guy straight up. I just wanted to break his skull open, man! How dare he follow me and threaten me to my face. I wanted to crush his fucking skull. It was so hard not to.

 

Sorry, I’m getting a bit worked up recalling the memory, but I just walked away and I had a it was a difficult. It was a difficult calm down period. It took about 40 minutes. I usually calm down faster than that, but, yeah, 40 minutes. And then I just didn’t care anymore. And I was laughing about it. But the police came to my door a few days later and they told me they wanted me to make a statement because he’d made a statement. And I said:

 

“No, thank you.”

 

So they left and they came back about three months later and they said:

 

“Look, we’ve reviewed the footage. It’s pretty clear that he was following you and that he antagonised you, however, and we weren’t going to charge you.”

 

They said:

 

“However, the guy has been emailing the commissioner or the assistant commissioner, and we’ve had a directive from high up to charge you with something.”

 

And they just confided this in me, these constables, because they actually didn’t want to serve the papers on me. These constables didn’t want to do it. They were just like, really reluctant and apologetic and explaining the whole situation. They didn’t have to tell me any of this. They said that, quote, unquote, “victim”, the guy who followed me in the supermarket, he emailed the commissioners or some high ranking police bureaucrat. I remember them saying some sort of commissioner, and they had to charge me with something. So they picked the lowest possible assault charge they could find. It was a summary offence called unlawful assault. Summary meaning you don’t need to be on bail for it’s probably just going to be a fine, or a good behaviour Bond or something. And I said:

 

“Right, okay, thank you.”

 

I went to court. What did I get? I think I got a fine for it. And that was it.

 

He didn’t show up to court or anything like that. He’d taken photos of his body and provided them to the police, you know, this noble, “anti-racist, anti-fascist”. There was no actual bad damage. There was just some bruising, I think, but there was no proof that that actually came from the result of that was a result of me pushing him.

 

But, yeah, there’s only three times I’ve been approached, and I suppose I’ve been rambling on for a while about it now. Three times that it was a that it was a negative fashion, you know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ve heard those stories before, but I’m sure the audience enjoyed them. Fellow Comrades said:

 

“Blair seems to ignore the current trending talking points, cuts through them and just speaks his mind.”

 

Well, that’s one thing that I think is refreshing about Blair. He’s always got his own spin on things, which is unique.

 

I also want to mention. So I jumped on this Twitter space the other night. I finished training with the boys, and everyone was talking. I pulled my phone out and I saw there was these libertarian accounts, Australian libertarian accounts, on Twitter. I think John Goddard was the account that was hosting the space with a couple other guys. And the space was called Australian nationalism. And they were kind of presenting themselves like, as if they were spokespeople of Australian nationalism, but they were basically civic nationalists. They were like, well maybe there’s too many immigrants, but as long as you salute the flag and you embrace Australian values or as Aussie as anyone else, like that kind of stuff.

 

And I was like, I got to jump in on this, like, heal what a real nationalist thinks. And another, another account jumped in first, and he was saying some stuff, and they didn’t let me out for a while, but I told the group chats, like comment in this, tell them to let Joel up.

 

Eventually they did, and I had a chat with them and I thought it went pretty well, actually, though, I think I defended the position quite well. And they kind of made, I think they were quite sympathetic, actually, to a lot of the points that I was making. And I was thinking, that’s really good! You don’t get those opportunities a lot in Australian politics to talk to where people that are more towards the centre but on the Right, you have a little bit of a platform, will talk to someone like me or someone like Blair. And whenever that does happen, I think we always handle ourselves very well because our worldview has got a lot going for it.

 

And often the only reason why people haven’t really contended without our ideas that often because they’re so marginalised and repressed and so on, that when they are confronted with them, usually they have very poor counter-arguments and don’t really know how to defend themselves against it, particularly if they style themselves as kind of populist Right-wing, wing Australian patriots or whatever, then it’s especially hard for them to counter our talking points. You have to take the opposite, like Left-wing worldview almost to be able to oppose us properly. So that went quite well. And I’d like to do more things like that. And they were friendly and good natured. And I appreciate that.

 

I think we should always endeavour to have dialogue open with the libertarians and the conservatives and so on as much as possible. And I do believe that our ideas are better than theirs and that in a free and open forum of discourse, we’ll win people over. So I’m thankful to them for being friendly and good sports. But this other guy jumped on, called Reptile Hybrid on Twitter. He’s X.com reptile hybrid. He seems like a conspiracy theorist of some description.

 

And anyway, he jumped on quickly to say that he was enjoying the space.

 

And then he invited me on to do a space with him this Sunday night at 08:00 pm so I agreed to doing it because he’s got like 60,000 followers. He’s got a pretty good platform. He does spaces regularly.

 

And yeah, it’s good, as I said, to talk to these adjacent factions. He jumped on and he said:

 

“Oh because we’re talking about immigration, he said, the people that run the world, they’re trying to replace western populations and it’s on purpose. And whatever they’re called, I don’t, we don’t know what they are. They reptilians? Are they Freemasons?”

 

And I was like:

 

“I know what they are, mate. They’re the jews!”

 

And anyway, so we’ll go and have a chat to a conspiracy theorist about the jews, I guess, and other things.

 

And anyway, he seemed interested to have a conversation, and that’s always good. Uh, whenever, you know, people are open minded and want to have a chat. Oh, you know, that was a really good thing about when I did the streams with Elijah Schaffer or things like, whenever anyone in conservative adjacent wants to talk to us, we should always take those opportunities and try and be friendly to the ones that are friendly to us. So support that stream. It’s reptile underscore hybrid. Hybrid. I will. I don’t really know him, honestly. I don’t really know him from other than that brief two minute interaction. But he seems like a nice guy, so it should be interesting.

 

I’ll post links on social media so you guys can tune in if you want something to listen to on Sunday night 08:00, pm I’ve been jumping on Twitter Spaces more lately. I’m enjoying them again. There was a period where I was jumping on Twitter Spaces all the time, and then I stopped doing them. Organised a few Twitter Spaces a few months ago with some people on Right-wing Twitter that I liked, and I should probably start doing that again because I thought that was good content. But Twitter Spaces are underrated, I think, because they can facilitate conversations where people who maybe wouldn’t be as interested in collaborating with you in a formal way.

 

But if you jump on a Twitter space and they’re on a Twitter space, they’ll have a chat. There was a Twitter space the other day that another nationalist account, Percy Sneedinson, he organised a Twitter space where he. I think he got into an argument with some Marxist on the top on Twitter about immigration and the housing crisis. And then I jumped in on that, and we all just kind of ganged up on this Marxist. It was pretty funny. That kind of shit is fun. Twitter Spaces are unique in that respect.

 

So if you’re not on Twitter, jump on Twitter and so you can follow those Twitter Spaces. I think, Blair, we should probably do a Twitter space actually, one night, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: The audio works really well on Twitter for some reason. Whatever software or programs Twitter uses to record audio through the spaces, it works really well with my microphone, I noticed.

 

But, yeah, I’m more than willing for now. I’ve got to go, though. I’m like, I’m really tired. I’ve got to nearly start with work in the morning, so I’m going to have to let you go. But thanks, everyone, for your questions, for tuning in. Thanks very much to everyone for the Superchats. There was plenty of them this week, and I’m sure that makes Joel grinny smiley happy.

 

But, yeah, I’m out. See you later.

 

Joel Davis: I see, man. Yeah, I’ve got to go through the last couple Superchats here. Hands Rudol. He said another $14.88 Superchat said for. Thanks for the solid milk advice. It was me with the milk questions. I think a few people were asking milk questions.

 

And then also Alt Cuperian said:

 

“I’m seeing a lot of people in my life jump on board with race, realism, friends and family, people in my church. I’m feeling a vibe shift.”

 

Yeah, a lot of people are saying this. It does seem to be a vibe shift, but, yeah, we’ll end the stream there. Thanks for watching. We’ll see you all next week. Something that I’m doing the Twitter space. I will actually probably look into seeing how I can broadcast the show on Twitter as well. And I need to get set up. The GoyimTV guys said I could broadcast there. I want to just try and put the show on as many different platforms as possible.

 

But yeah, I’ll let obviously let you guys know on social media, on Telegram and stuff when I do anything.

 

So if you want more content, keep an eye out for that.

 

But in the meantime, thanks for watching. We’ll see you next week. Goodbye.

 

[3:03:58]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/2/2024 = 62)

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Here is piece on Jewtube, places a pre-Semitic White racial stock was present in the Middle East. The Semites came in much later in history. No the original Hebrews were not White!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp6H0VSvi9Y Aryan Bloodlines of Ancient Babylon – ROBERT SEPEHR
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Good point, Indians are the very example of the result of miscegenation that is Racial Chaos.
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Europeans are simply the best, we are truly a new unique and gifted race that the world envies and our cultural and technological achievements have been adopted by all races. This is being used against us.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Verbose critters, that are loud. “Thank you, come again” Apu from the Simpsons comes to mind.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Jeets are the new proxies of Jewish power. They are being flooded into the West to become the new managerial class to displace the White man. They are corruptible and easily for the Jews to use in their agenda. BTW most other coloured races also hate Indians, there are particularly objectionable in their behaviour , dirty and ugly to boot.
0 likes

masklophobix
6 hours ago
Europeans are descended from Noah’s son Japheth. (After The Flood – Bill Cooper)
0 likes

jvlake
7 hours ago
I work in IT, what Joel said at 21:51 is 100% correct! Sales/project people are usually still white and speak English, but once the contracts are signed it’s Mumbai all the way!
0 likes

ProvingNihil
8 hours ago
Joel I’m the exact same, I never pick up my phone to random phone numbers. Hell I rarely pick it up to anyone I know, can’t stand talking on the phone to begin with.
0 likes

ProvingNihil
10 hours ago
And I’m the same way I stare at non white’s as well, because I don’t trust them or like them.
0 likes

FenrisRagnarok
15 hours ago
*90 minutes of passionate racism later* “I wouldn’t wanna get my bank account closed for hate speech” bruh -.-
0 likes

AntiwokeMMA
15 hours ago
Pajeets are a plague on this Earth. There are enough of those superfluous cunts to ruin every White nation, and their jewish masters know this well.
1 like

Corkly
1 day ago
A Rumbler I shall be, it’s a Rumbler’s life for me. And here at our home on Rumble this do I decree: I wanted to be left alone and enjoy Iron Man. But then wokeness came for my favourite cartoons and movies. Now I see the inevitable battle. We must kill all our enemies, everyone different to us will be executed worldwide. We will have limited government and free market, and return to Christianity. I pledge to not let anything, friend, family or spouse, deter me from my hatred. – The Rumbler’s pledge
1 like

ProvingNihil
1 day ago
Love listening to this while driving, people give me stares haha but I don’t care.
1 like

vigilantejustice23
1 day ago
Sinwar learned Hebrew in prison – would’ve been an interesting topic to touch on. It’s also critical to acknowledge that the reason Js seem so different as a group is because they’re a parasitic organism fundamentally.
0 likes

Buzzerka
1 day ago
I tried to have a talk with you and Barry yesterday on X. I know my X name sounds sus “Bjorn Wartooth” but I’m on probably my 50th account due to being banned so many times. I actually have a real funny story to share. I think you will get kick out of how a friend of mine dealt with a kaffir in South Africa
0 likes

Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
yall are based. Good stuff. Cheers from North Carolina, USA. Lets get our civilization back brothers.
0 likes

Stephanie795
1 day ago
Introverts get drained when socialising for to long. They need to be alone to recharge.
1 like

Se7enius
1 day ago
theres no way blacks are graded above indiansn guys. Get real
0 likes

marv_perplex
1 day ago
Regarding noise pollution, it’s pretty much the same with all brownoids. African, Hispanic, Indian, Arab, etc. cities never sleep. The way they use common areas is just not the same as white westerners.
1 like

Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
I watch this for amusement. Joel the Jew pretending to be Catholic and Blair the meat head trying to be academic. You people sound up to date yet very ignorant!
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
What do you think scares the living fucking shit of them? Thousands and thousands of working class white Australians jointly reading free legal textbooks and rapidly evolving into Constitutional autodidact communities across every municipality in the country. Or 70 dudes dressed like Ninjas on parade. I just told you how to utterly destroy the enemy, I mean absolutely smoke them. Every single thing they’ve done from The Native Titles Act to Drag Queens in public can be held up in legal challenges til the end of fucking time. Get reading and win.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Before anyone says oh but it’s the visuals it’s the visuals. What could be better “visuals”, than a six foot four 30 year bogan called Steve wearing a flanno and Rollin a smoke espousing Section 73 of The Australian Constitution at Frankston Local Court House every time he destroys some Legal Aid dickhead lawyer he wiped the floor with.
1 like

Doubleud40
2 days ago
To Blair’s point about indians intermixing and creating this hybrid race, and this accounting for their deficiencies, this Indian guy just started at my office and lucky for me, picked the seat next to mine as his permanent desk. So aside from his weird smell and ridiculous accent i can’t understand, he has this awful habit of cracking his bones, i say bones cause it’s anything from his fingers, to his neck to his back. Every fucken part of his body cracks for no reason whenever he moves around. Literally sends a shiver down my spine when i hear it. His first day i asked him to stop cracking his knuckles, cause it sounds annoying af every 3 minutes, and then i noticed his entire body cracks and pops constantly, wtf is wrong with his body? He also has zero muscles. It’s almost like he’s just, i don’t know…built different?
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
It isn’t just housing. It is race & therefore culture. Blacks need to be in Africa. Indians need to be in India. They do not need to be housed in White countries. Race matters. Race creates culture. They seem happy to flee from their own shit holes to come leech off of us. Why is that? Because their own people are shit with a shit culture. Why else leave?
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
Blacks in the USA are annoying because they constantly bang on about White supremacy & romanticize shithole Africa for some stupid reason, yet they don’t get the fuck out & move to Africa. Everyone is full of shit.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Same thing here in Australia. You can’t leave your home without being reminded that you’re walking on stolen land from some tribe of nomads that supposedly existed on it for six hundred thousand years or something? So if it is theirs, uh huh, why don’t you give them back your own house you uppity leftists cunt, is what we all want to say. It’s all able to be challenged legally of course but the whites prefer to watch football and do nuffin
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
In terms of people being bad at their jobs for basic services, I can say I noticed a MASSIVE difference in the quality in the USA when certain Grocery stores started hiring negroes from the other side of town instead of white people in our own community. Everything goes to shit. That is a constant problem in the USA. Which is why we tend to have white flight. If we are not going to have forced segregation, then we will have white flight when people try to force integration. The “stay & fight” deal doesn’t work unless you can force these people out. Otherwise, it ends up a mixed shithole that ultimately ends up with white people having to leave if they want a better quality of life. Segregation is the answer. It just needs to be by law. White people need their own countries. It isn’t complicated. It is only complicated when people start making excuses as to why that is bad. I have no problem with those who disagree going to live with shitskins. Just not here.
4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
Until we remove the jew from all facets of our society, this will not stop. The Jew needs to be removed from lobbying, financial institutions, media, ext. We need to fully remove any jewish influence. Then we can work on removing their pawns, or the brownoid invaders.
0 likes

BortSampson
2 days ago
I’m gonna miss Barry Stanton
1 like

EvanL
2 days ago
The welsh language is evidently very similar to Hebrew, so much so that Welshmen can read and understand Hebrew. How’s that for evidence that the anglo-saxons are the true Israelites?
0 likes

ADC789
3 days ago
Mega KEK
0 likes

PhDintheJQ
3 days ago
14卐88
3 likes

TheBrazenCarCharger
3 days ago
The fact that there are more Indians than white people should be enough to say no to Indian immigration
1 like

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Hebrews were white. Jesus was basically proto-Irish. That’s why all the depictions of him are a white guy. Gaelic is similar to Hebrew in many ways. “Lost Tribes” became Celts/picts, Saxons, Goths, Gauls, Visigoths, Nordic/Scandinavians, and possibly Slavs too. In 2024 the ones calling themselves “Jews” are actually Canaanites. Arabs are from Ishmael. Blacks are from Cush. Whites are the line of Isaac and Jacob. Eustace Mullins did a TON of research on this. That’s why the “Jews” killed Christ. He called them the Synagogue of Satan. “Those who say they are Jews but are not, and lie.” It explains basically everything. Eustace Mullins audiobook “The Curse of Canaan” is free on Bitchute.
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
I encourage anyone to check out that audiobook. It will fill your heart with love for your people, purpose, and the knowledge that YHWH actually is real, we actually ARE here for a reason, and we have a distinct enemy that absolutely HATES us specifically. Why else would Jews target only white countries with invasion? It’s clear. They are of Ham and Canaan, Noah’s grandson who sold his birthright for a bowl of soup. And they are jealous of her sons of Isaac – Isaac’s Sons – SAXONS
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
hadefo
3 days ago
comment on mi replies if you’re interested on the thing i said. jesus and the egyptian prophet by lena einhorn is not directly cited in the videos i marked, but it’s relevant too.
0 likes

hadefo
3 days ago
i found that theory reading the work of ralph ellis, a well educated freemason you can find on youtube. he doesn’t say the same as you, directly, but it’s pretty obvious the implications are that the jews were some sort of europeans. look it up. you’ll find it interesting and you’ll find data that’s not outside freemason circles.
0 likes

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Holy fuck. I’m in Texas and if we are getting the “better indians” y’all must be dealing with pure trash
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
hadefo
3 days ago
when they are few, they act polite. but once they are more, they are other story.
1 like

ADC789
3 days ago
Ever been to Fiji
1 like

SpainforSpaniards
3 days ago
#freebarry
2 likes

FLmetalhead
3 days ago
Just got suspended on X and have no idea why. Has anyone had to make a new account? Pisses me off.
1 like

Chingadero
3 days ago
to paraphrase Barry Stanton (who’s account is now suspended on X)- “India could send 1 000 000 people to 200 different country’s. And still have 1.2 Billion people. Let that sink in.”
11 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
BortSampson
2 days ago
Terrifying
1 like

GaiusAlexander
3 days ago
Blair if you want to learn a language jumpspeak is the most natural flowing app I’ve tried.
1 like

Winz0
3 days ago
pajeets are STINKY
6 likes

Lueger
3 days ago
40:14 Sidenote: “Ave Maria” is “Hail [victory] Mary” in Latin. Most people know the Schubert version, but there is a Bach version also.
4 likes

FilisKGB
3 days ago
Joel do something sexier with the hair.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
3 days ago
Fucking creeping us out Bruh. Seriously you’re being watched by tens of thousands per episode, get a stylist on the case.
0 likes

JimboinLA
3 days ago
‘The white race is the most beautiful and interesting.’ Hollywood is going broke because they are trying to deny this and elevate and make the focus about the lesser races. And no one is saying it except a few who are censored.
11 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
Challenge: Blair remain on topic. Difficulty: Impossible.
10 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
I must preserve this Blair quote: “Dissent seven years ago was: Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, preserve our culture, and we stand against the left.” “Dissent now is: Here’s why Hitler was right, racism is natural and good, and leftists aren’t human.”
24 likes

AllegianceMountain
3 days ago
Only non-compromised and fully honest and fully insightful channel on Rumble. Blood of the Numenoreans and Eldar.
1 like

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
15 min based intro, followed by ..ongoing Tip-of-spear investigation of amyloidygenic potentials in P fiz er.. ..based outro; https://rumble.com/v5cgk62-the-block-chain-monad-asymmetric-war-against-bio-digital-convergence-the-bi.html
-1 likes

katana17
3 days ago
[Joel Davis – Wargaming the Response as Communists Organise Brown Parasites – Aug 22, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Joel introduces the show and mention it will cover Australian politics. Discussion of healthcare and hospitals, with Blair saying: “Most people are sitting in hospital because they smoke two packs of cigarettes a day for 25 years, drink every day, eat a lot of sugar, never exercise.” Critique of modern hospitals: “There’s no natural air, there’s no natural light. Um, it’s. There’s just beeping, just constant beeping.” Discussion of working with disadvantaged youth and why it can be demoralizing. “If I’m ugly, if I’m deranged, if I’m twisted, then everyone else needs to be too.” Critique of the medical industry: “The medical industry profits from keeping people sick.” Discussion of eugenics and selective breeding. “We dedicate so much effort to try to breed strong racehorses for the purposes of betting. But when someone mentions the concept of human eugenics and breeding a higher humanity, everybody gets offended.” Talk about incels and sterilizing worldviews. “I assumed that you had to have a license to have children.” Discussion of marriage and the church’s role historically. Introduction of the main topic: protests against refugee encampments. Description of recent nationalist counter-protest: “We did a Nazi rally and we even broke our own rules. We used profanity.” “We want Normie white masses looking at the neo-Nazis and going, ‘Fuck, yeah, that’s what we want!’” Discussion of media coverage and public reaction to their protests. “We have the best grandmas.” Talk about the value of street activism and creating dramatic scenes. Discussion of potential future ….
1 like

Delete
‹ Hide 1 reply
Corndiesel11
Supporter
3 days ago
I thought this was the entire transcript of the last episode
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
The entire transcript, (along with many more transcripts) with images is at the link I gave above and here: https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review. We are live tonight on DLive, Odysee, Rumble and Entropy. Sorry we’re a few minutes late. I had a couple of minor technical issues which I had to iron out for some reason. Streamyard was playing up a little bit. I don’t know why, couldn’t get it to work. But it is now working and we are ready to fly.

 

So here we are, and we have the return tonight of Eric Striker. I’ll be introducing him shortly, but before we do that, I just want to say please help share the stream. Please tell everyone we’re live. Obviously, I am de-platformed on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, you name it. I’m only on alternative social networks.

 

So please do help share this stream, help get the word out that this is happening. That would be really, really helpful for me and it would mean more people get to see this excellent show.

 

Secondly, please do consider making a contribution to the show. The show will run for 2 hours in the second half of the show. We take questions or comments from the viewers. You can contribute via Odysee or Entropy. If you send your comment or your question, we will read it out live on air in the second hour of the show. And obviously, if you send a financial contribution, I’ll be very grateful. That is what keeps us afloat. It’s what keeps our head above water.

 

Now, I don’t put any of my work behind a paywall. Everything’s free. All my videos are free, my books free, and people can contact me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. And you can download my book from thefallofwesternman.com.

 

So if you can spare something, $3, $5, $10, whatever you can afford, it will be greatly appreciated. You can also donate via crypto. All my crypto links are down in the description below. Please do check those out. You can donate whether I am online or offline, and you can find them in the description on Odysee on Rumble and if you’re watching on replay on BitChute.

 

Finally, as I said earlier, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. And I will be back later this week. I’ve got a video coming out on the recent stabbings in Germany at the Diversity Festival. I’m also live with Dr David Duke at 04:00 pm on Friday and on Sunday I am back with Natty and the Patriarch for the Nationalist A-Team.

 

So I’ve got a packed weekend coming up and a packed two hour show. We’ll run slightly late tonight because we started slightly late. And for once it wasn’t Striker’s fault. It was all my fault. Technical issues plagued me. I don’t know what was up with it.

 

Eric Striker: But anyway, time is money. Time is money.

 

Mark Collett: Usually late. For once you were on time. It was all my fault. So I apologise.

 

But we’ve got Eric Striker here. It’s been a while. It’s been 30 weeks since you’ve been on this show? How time flies. You’ve now got your own show with Warren Balogh. You are back. It’s called War Strike. It is excellent, if slightly long for my liking. 7 hours of streaming is probably too much for any normal human being, but Eric Striker is no normal human being.

 

And he also does an excellent! He’s got his own excellent Substack called Litoria and he still works with the justice report. I regularly share their work. Their takes are always excellent!

 

So it’s a great pleasure to have you back here tonight, Eric.

 

And as you haven’t been here for a while, maybe you want to tell everyone what you’ve been up to since we last saw you.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah. So myself and Warren Balogh have been working on War Strike. It’s used to be twice a week, but I don’t think people have 16 hours in a week to listen to me and Warren. So we cut it down to one eight hour show a week. You know, if you could sit through the Lord of the Rigs trilogy, you could do the same for the War Strike drill. Well, one episode.

 

So we have that going on. I have Latoria and I might actually be working on a book. Will not say more, but pretty busy. So I hear things are exciting in your neck of the woods. Someone told me something was going on there.

 

Mark Collett: Things have been exciting. And if by exciting you mean a Labour power grab, which is absolutely terrifying and probably the most draconian set of speech laws incoming that we’ve got in the whole western world. I did say to people that Labour and the Tories, they are two sides of the same coin, but the Tories are kind of like, the car is going to the edge of the cliff at 40 miles an hour, Labour. The car is going to the edge of the cliff at 70 miles an hour. And if anyone ever voted for the Lib-Dems, or if the Lib-Dems ever got to power, well, the car would be going at light speed and you’d be over the edge of the cliff before you even knew it.

 

But things are getting very interesting here, and Britain has always been regarded as one of the countries in Europe that has had probably more rights when it comes to free speech. We’ve never had specific Holocaust denial laws. We have had anti-Hate Speech laws, which, you know, there is a reasonable threshold there. In the past, if you were to be accused of hate speech, you have to have used threatening, insulting or abusive language. It has to fall in that category. But the new laws they’re bringing in are simply going to state that it was likely that hate would be stirred up.

 

So these new laws will be probably brought to Parliament shortly after this Hundred Day security sprint that the Home Office on whether assessing different groups, social networks, language used online, individuals that have been named as being the ones that stirred up recent troubles. It’s going to be interesting times, but I think people living in Britain are going to see Britain very rapidly transforming into a Soviet style Police State under the Labour Party.

 

Eric Striker: Well, I think that one of the reasons the people in Britain are being subjected to this is due to the fact that you are in a Hungary 1956 style situation over there. Those protests are remarkable. The anti-immigration protests, the White uprising, and they are actually an example for the entire Western world that the people there have had enough. They’re not going to allow the system to bully them. So they have to pull out all the hard power stops. You know, they have to just throw everyone in jail, release all the criminals, put all the thought criminals in. It’s how it is. This is the path to power, my friend.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll say this. The anti-immigration protests have largely fizzled out. Around 1,000 people have been arrested.

 

And right now the government are arresting, well, a range of other people that said things on social media, and they are still hunting down people who said things online.

 

So at the moment, it is quite terrifying to be a nationalist in the UK. Well, if you’re a nationalist in the UK, that was saying anything of any note, it is quite terrifying, I can tell you this. I think as and when they bring in these new laws. I did a video on this last week. It’s up on my Odysee channel. I think we’re going to see probably the largest crackdown on free speech, and I think using words such as swamping in conjunction with immigration, that will now become illegal. And they’re going to beef up the existing Online Safety Bill and the online safety laws to basically turn those into some kind of draconian charter for closing down social networks. And Telegram is the one that is really in their sights.

 

And as we saw sort of at the end of last week, Pavel Durov the Russian who owns Telegram, he has been arrested in France. He is being now held by the French authorities. They keep extending the amount of time they can hold him for. And it appears as if this is probably the first step towards actually shutting down a social network via putting serious, serious pressure in terms of criminal actions against that social network’s owner. I don’t know what you think about this, but I’ve actually got quite a bit to say about this because I find this very interesting.

 

Eric Striker: Well, the way I look at this, I think the most useful way to look at it is to see developments in the United Kingdom, in France, to see the arrest of Durov. See, this is part of a broader system on War Strike. We’ve done quite a few episodes demonstrating how the United Kingdom has become a vassal state of American high finance, judeo-American high finance.

 

And so when you see things like someone being arrested, like in the case of Durov, you have to think like, who benefits, right? Who is this coming from? Who’s giving permission for this? I suspect that all of this is emanating from Washington, where they see the phrase of the global empire starting to actually go, the British government is one of the most discredited and hated on the planet by its people. Okay? No doubt about it. It has a very low approval rate. There’s no opposition party in sight. The honeymoon with Kier Starmer was over within days. And you see a crisis of legitimacy in that country. These are very dangerous things for the elites there.

 

And so when you have a situation like Telegram and Durov, someone who sensibly does not let any government bully him into becoming their tool, you know, Durov has been approached by several intelligence agencies, from the FBI to French intelligence. His phone was hacked, I believe, by French intelligence to work for them. They tried to actually get Telegram to move to Paris to be based out of there, because they want to use Telegram to overthrow the Venezuelan government or spread discord in Iran and so on. But they don’t want it to be used to organise protests against immigration in the UK. They don’t want it to be used to report accurately on what Israel is doing in Gaza. They don’t want it to be used to tell us what’s going on in Ukraine. Our media in the West, particularly Anglo-sphere, is worse than nothing on that.

 

The only way you can get even a shred of an idea of what’s going on in the Ukraine war is through Telegram. It’s now the osent platform that all professionals use. Twitter is useless. All these others are useless.

 

So this whole thing where they’re saying Durov is responsible for people selling drugs on Telegram. Well, anyone that has ever had WhatsApp.

 

Can see that there’s people selling drugs on there all over the place. They talk about child pornography and human trafficking, blaming Durov for that. Instagram was outed as the number one hub for child trafficking of all the Internet platforms. But because Instagram and because WhatsApp.

 

Are owned by judeo-Americans who work very closely in tandem with the CIA and the FBI, they’re allowed to do this.

 

And finally, the reason I think they used the French government to arrest Durov, rather than just the American government doing it, is because of section 230.

 

So what the United States does, the American Deep State, when they can’t actually use American laws to prosecute you, they get one of their NATO vassal states, like France or Britain, to do it for them.

 

And I think that the ultimate objective here is to break Durov and turn him into a lackey of the judeo-American order so that they can only use it to harm their enemies without any blowback coming back to them.

 

Mark Collett: Well, what made me laugh about Durov is Durov’s obviously Russian descent, and he left Russia, and he made his home in the West. And I found this pretty damn interesting, because in the era that I was brought up in, I’m an eighties child.

 

I was born in 1980, and as I was born in 1980, I was brought up on the Sean Connery and Roger Moore James Bond films. And I was brought up in that kind of era where people fled from Russia or from the Soviet Union to come to the West. And there was this idea that if you were a political dissident, the safest place for you to be a political dissident was in the West, because the West was the place where there was free speech, where there was freedom of association, where people had civil rights, where there was more Civil Liberties. And there was this idea that there would be a constant flow of intelligent people fleeing Russia and the Soviet Union to live in places like Britain, France, West Germany, America. That’s where political dissidents fled to. It was a one way movement from east to west.

 

And Pavel Durov, I’m not sure how old he is, but I’m sure he’s old enough to be sort of influenced by that kind of mindset. And obviously, he came here to the West from Russia. He broke away from Russia because he wanted to create a free speech a where people’s data was encrypted, safe, could be transmitted privately, because he believes in free speech. He believes in something greater. He doesn’t want a Police State. He doesn’t want his app. He doesn’t want his social network to be used by security services to spy on people. He doesn’t want to be bullied into being told who he can and who he can’t have on his social network. He’s a free speech privacy man. And he thought that the West was going to be the defender of his values.

 

And I find this quite amazing, that in my lifetime, the West has gone from that place which appeared to be this bastion of free speech where people would flee to in order to regain their privacy, their liberties and their rights, to a place that is in many ways far more oppressive than the modern day Eastern Europe or Russia. And all those Bond films where Roger Moore or Sean Connery has to extract a Russian or Soviet scientists to the West so they can be free and enjoy a private life and investigate things in a free and open way. Those days are gone. The West is the new Soviet Police State, and their NKVD is coming for anyone like Durov.

 

And when I heard that Durov had been arrested, my sort of response was sort of almost to throw my head back in the air and sort of just laugh. Well, not laugh, but sort of to sort of express, oh, God. In that kind of way of why did he think. What was he thinking when he thought places like France or Britain or Germany were going to be safer for him?

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, I mean, this is an outdated notion that a lot of Russians have going back to the Cold War. Like you said, there’s a very famous Russian dissident, Edward Liminov, and he was a bit of a crackpot. He was basically Putin’s first supposed persecuted dissident. He did the Natsbol party, and Putin cracked down on the Natsbols. They were part of the opposition, along with Alexei Navalny, who was a big Natsbol organiser. Long story there.

 

But anyway, there’s a book, you know, he wrote kind of a memoir where he moved as a dissident to the United States and realised that America was just as repressive as the Soviet Union.

 

And so he just kind of wrote off all these systems and became a total nihilist because he was just like, okay, they’re all bad at the end of the day, like anything, if you’re the guy in power, think of the American empire as a collapsing, as a giant with clay feet, where at one point, the American empire wanted everybody to live according to the principles of free trade, right? Well, no longer. Now America is leading the world in protectionism, largely because of China. China is better at the trade than America. They produce more. So now America is the protectionist.

 

Then you have the issue of human liberty, free speech being an example to the world of a nation where you can say, read or think whatever you want. Well, if your system is being actively challenged and you’re not confident that it can win, you have no choice but to immediately jump to hard power every time. Throwing people in jail, hate speech, legislation, censorship, violence.

 

Mark Collett: Okay?

 

Eric Striker: Because you can’t possibly deny that the British government is at least partially responsible for the Asian gangs that go and beat up Whites in retaliation for the immigration protests. Because of course, the police don’t arrest them, right?

 

And then you have, of course, the Antifa types, who mostly centreed in London and a few big cities, oftentimes made up of the local nonprofits and people in the gay community that are literally paid to be activists. Those people can do violence all they want, and the police are on their side. Right? The police quite literally make a safe path for them to walk and do their fake lark of a protest against the White majority in Britain. So what am I getting at here? Our governments are no different. No government reacts any different. It’s pure thuggery. They are clinging for life. This is the silver lining is that our regimes are actively collapsing, okay? The economies are basically lingering by a thread. The public does not actually believe these regimes, whether in France or in the UK or in America, are legitimate. If you don’t believe me, go look up McCrone’s approval rating or Keir Starmer’s approval rating. We’re becoming poor. I did a whole episode of War Strike on the United Kingdom, how the UK at this point is now manufacturing and exporting less than Mexico.

 

So in many regards, the United Kingdom, when you look at the GDP per PPP, is an emerging country outside of London. Most of the country is actually kind of poor. And the elites have no solutions for this. They know that there’s going to be an inevitable backlash that will make the current one look like child’s play. We’re not calling for it, we’re not encouraging it, we’re not organising it’s just something that’s going to happen. We are weather forecasters in the storm will come because there is no other. There’s no plan even for what to do with our countries, for what to do with our people.

 

So they are just reacting in fear. They’re lashing out and discrediting their entire project. The liberal world order in the process. In the long term, this is good for us.

 

Mark Collett: I think the thing as well that people miss when they talk about Britain’s exports and imports is Britain’s exports do look quite healthy on paper, but most of that is financial services. These aren’t exports, where you’re producing things which have a trickle down effect and actually benefits, benefit normal people. When you have some financial guy sat in an office somewhere who can add a billion pounds to some kind of export, to export in a couple of clicks of a button that does not trickle down to normal people, that isn’t like you created a billion pounds worth of shoes in a factory, and thousands of people were employed. Thousands of people had to be employed to make their uniforms and to make them sandwiches and to cut their hair and to serve them drinks and meals in the pub after they finished work. That’s one of the major problems, that Britain’s economy seems healthier than it is because of the City of London. If you remove the City of London, it wouldn’t look as good on the balance sheet.

 

And the problem with the City of London as the City of London only benefits a tiny number of people, which obviously creates a huge problem. But back to Durov. I am sure that the French government have been pressured as well by the UK, because there are serious moves now within the UK to ensure that Telegram is banned. And I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple or Google, via the a store or the Google Play Store at some point moved as well to ban the app. They’re doing this.

 

And I think there’s going to be an interesting knock on effect as well.

 

Number one, we’ve seen this sort of flipping of the narrative, where the West is no longer a bastion of free speech and is many ways more oppressive than powers in the east.

 

And secondly, I think this is a big flex on people like Elon Musk, because in the UK, the British government have mentioned Telegram. They have talked about the need to control Telegram and the bad things happen on Telegram. But the UK government have also criticised Elon Musk, accused him of stirring tension, sharing disinformation, and allowing Twitter to let people like Tommy Robinson and others call for people to attend protests and to share information that led to those protests becoming hotbeds of disorder.

 

So I think some of this is potentially a way to threaten Musk. What do you think to that?

 

Eric Striker: I have to strongly disagree with that.

 

In fact, I think this crackdown on Telegram is synergistic, with a move to nudge more people towards Twitter. And let me explain my theory here. So it recently came out that the top shareholders for Twitter are a group of jewish billionaires, many of them with connections to Israeli intelligence, such as Bill Ackmanden. There’s another guy, Larry Ellison. I believe even Puff Daddy or P. Diddy is a major shareholder at Twitter.

 

So there’s a lot of shady stuff going on in terms of the control of Twitter, the interaction they have with the Israeli government and the British government. Because how else does the British Police State find those who make naughty tweets who are anonymous, if not through collaboration from Twitter?

 

So these are all open ended questions. Not saying that any smoking gun yet, but I think there are many reasons to be sceptical of Twitter.

 

For example, I was researching the loan process, how Elon Musk bought Twitter. And it’s kind of suspicious, because on paper, it’s the worst business deal banks have made, probably since 2008. They loaned him $13 billion to buy Twitter. The company, as soon as Elon Musk took power, lost half of its value. He paid 44 billion. It’s now worth 19 billion. Very bad decision from the banks. So is there a government role? Is there a clandestine intelligence agreement going on with Twitter with this strange money that was used to buy Twitter? That Musk put in some money, but a lot of it also came from these banks that, on paper, made one of the worst banking decisions in history with Twitter.

 

So these are all questions that I believe are open ended. I think that it’s not controversial to say that even if Musk is not a bad actor, that if he’s a good actor, that he’s going to be far more willing to work with the British government and the American governments than Pavel Durov and his 30 engineers, because there’s only 30 people that work on Telegram, by the way. So he keeps a very tight circle. Pavel Durov, just to compare, Google has thousands of workers dedicated just to censorship. So think of that in terms of the corruptibility of the whole project.

 

So I think that, actually, if I had to speculate, there may be a move to push some of the energy onto Twitter where the American government can better see it. The American government has a backdoor, can watch. Everybody has. It’s the owners close to home, rather than Babel Durov, who’s in the United Arab Emirates and flying around the world and kind of a loose cannon. Just my own theory here. I don’t think Musk is in any trouble.

 

Mark Collett: Well, the UK government has sort of mentioned him. Twitter already has to abide by certain laws in countries like Germany, where certain tweets are greyed out. The World bank suspended all their advertising on Twitter the other day over Musk’s refusal to suspend certain racist accounts.

 

And I do think the arrest of Pavel Durov is something that would worry someone like Musk.

 

Now, the UK government are never going to extradite him from America, that’s a fact. But he would be maybe foolish to land on British soil and other people are going to be feeling the same way. You know, again, you talk about America using its vassal states. Well, America probably isn’t going to arrest Musk for allowing hate speech to flourish on Twitter, but if he landed in Britain, Britain could arrest him. Same with the French state.

 

And I think that, obviously, I’m not saying Musk is 100% a nationalist, but since he has. Since he has taken on Twitter, he has used the platform to change sort of what’s allowed to be said. And he’s boosted numerous people. He’s talked about the JQ, he’s let numerous people back. He’s allowing people to use the platform more freely than it was before.

 

I mean, this isn’t perfect because there’s certain people who haven’t been allowed back.

 

And I think the British government do fear that kind of social network. I think the British government do fear somebody like Musk, you know, allowing Twitter to be used in that way. I mean, notably, one MP was very unhappy that he allowed the Donald Trump interview on X. You know, obviously, the government themselves have mentioned him, so I don’t really think there’s a conspiracy here. I think, you know, Musk should definitely be wary about where he travels to.

 

Eric Striker: I don’t think Musk is very close to the American intelligence state.

 

In fact, some of his companies are funded by the American Deep State. He’s very close to the Israeli government. He’s very close to many of these different regimes. Sure, that he allows some degree of free speech, but again, this is pulling energy away from Telegram. If you’re going to be able to use Twitter, you’re not going to use Telegram, because Telegram is full. There’s no conversation happening there. And if there is a lot of different feds and stuff are polluting the platform with all types of shenanigans, Twitter is less so on that front.

 

But I do think that Twitter might have more to it than meets the eye. And I don’t think Musk is as big of as big of a fan as we might think.

 

After all, remember, you’re allowed to say what you want on Twitter to a point, to an extent, as long as you’re not politically organising. Who were the people that were surgically banned when they brought everybody back onto Twitter? Who was surgically banned? Who remained surgically banned? It was everybody with NJP, right? Everybody from Patriotic Alternative, everybody from the Nordic Resistance Movement, basically all the organic leaders of the White race, regardless of the country, the political organisations, the vehicles that turn free speech into political action. Legal, after all of it protected by law, according to the little book, every rule followed.

 

Yet nevertheless, when we would upload a video of an NJP protest on Twitter, it would be immediately flagged and shut down. The account would be closed. Even those that were there for years would suddenly be closed without any warning and no appeal. I find that to be incredibly suspicious, particularly how surgical it is. It’s the people inside of Twitter know exactly who we are and are very hostile to us, specifically you and I, Mark. You and I, …

 

Mark Collett: Look, I understand that, and I understand there have been other Twitter accounts that have been taken care of, so to speak. You know, Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, Lucas Gage. There have been several people who were removed and several people who have been allowed back.

 

However, I will say this. Twitter is a much more approachable platform than Telegram.

 

Now, Telegram is arguably a more useful platform in terms of organising things because of the way it does pretty much everything. You can stream, you can share movies, you can have discussion groups, you can use it as you would use Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Twitch. You know, you can use it to organise in a way that basically draws from every existing social network or video sharing site.

 

So it is a very useful tool, but it is not immediately as discoverable or digestible as a site like Twitter, which allows you to reach millions more.

 

And I think there have been people I know you’re not a great fan of people like Nick Fuentes, but they come on there and they’re getting, you know, millions of people are seeing his tweets on things like the JQ.

 

And I think that’s important in terms of education. But I do totally agree with you. There is a hard barrier on Twitter that prevents anyone going onto the platform who is trying to organise a real world ethno-nationalist movement. And that is something that we absolutely noticed. And it wasn’t just a case of one account going down, it was a case of all accounts going down at exactly the same moment. And a hard ban being placed on any links to websites associated with that organisation.

 

So you can’t share links or you couldn’t share links to NJP you couldn’t share links to Patrick, or you can’t share links to Patriotic Alternative.

 

When it comes down to it is a very, very difficult situation to be in, because obviously, I’m not happy that I’m banned there, but I am happy that other people who regularly come on my show are allowed there to speak freely and to speak to a wider audience than I do.

 

Eric Striker: Here’s where I have my critiques of that, is that there’s a sort of ersatz effect here, where you have figures like Candace Owens who are allowed to use these platforms and grow very large. They attract people throwing a couple of bones out on JQ stuff, but then they spin you off down this rabbit hole of pure nonsense of paranoid schizophrenia. I think what they’re. What’s going on here is certain types of people, I’m not saying they’re agents or whatever, but I think certain types of opinions are actually artificially boosted on Twitter, while those that are more common sense are not. And that’s not something I’m making up, because there are hackers that actually saw some of the algorithms that Twitter under Musk has, where accounts like end wokeness or clown world are boosted artificially. Ben Shapiro. Boosted artificially.

 

And I think it’s to actually manipulate the public conversation going on a bit. Remember, it’s not that people are seeing Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes, and suddenly they’re awake to the JQ. It’s the jews themselves for their behaviour in Gaza, where they are quite literally raping people and then defending. Raping people in their captivity, murdering children by the thousands. That’s what’s waking people up.

 

So when you have somebody like Candice Owens say:

 

“Well, it’s because they believe in Sapatian Frankism.”

 

And so on and so forth, they’re engaging in epistemic pollution of the discussion. It’s not that they believe in Frankism. It’s that they. That’s who they are. They believe in the Talmud. The Talmud says, rise and kill them first. Kill the man, the woman, the child, hell, even kill the new puppy in the house. They have this mindset. The world is waking up, because, again, the Left is growing to be very anti-zionist, just as the Right is. And it’s simply for the same reason the world was angry at ISIS. They are the ones making themselves look bad.

 

So my fear is, some of these performers on Twitter that do some of the half good, half bad, they may actually be doing some harm to the conversation in terms of trying to understand what it is that billions of people in the world are seeing right before their eyes, largely on Telegram. That’s where you get the hardcore footage from the war in Gaza that is actually really making an impression on people. To see little kids with their heads blown off, to seeing people getting systematically raped with the permission of the Israeli government officials, to see journalists in Israel defending that behaviour, this is actually what’s radicalising people.

 

And so if you’re on Twitter, you may be nudged in a different direction or maybe off the target a bit. That’s just my opinion or my.

 

Mark Collett: I disagree with you, and I’ll tell you why I disagree with you. Candice Owens. She’s not someone who I believe understands everything as well as, say, myself, you, somebody like Dr David Duke or Kevin MacDonald.

 

But the fact she’s talking about this in any degree and that she’s holding these sort of crazy Twitter Spaces where anyone can join, and you’ve got people like Dan Bilzerian talking about it and they’re all trying to get to the bottom of these issues and they’re talking about the JQ in any way. Millions of people who weren’t aware there was even an issue of Zionist or jewish power are all of a sudden aware of that now. They might not be given a copy of My Awakening or jewish supremacism or The Culture of Critique or some book that’s going to explain it in greater detail that is going to lay everything out right from A to Z in a logical fashion. But they’re sort of getting A, B, C, F, G, I, H, D, E, you know, X, Y, Z. And there’s some bits missing because Candice Owens, I believe, doesn’t know exactly what she’s talking about at the moment.

 

But the fact she’s talking about it to some degree is better than not talking about it at all! Because four or five years ago, people like Dan Bilzerian, Candice Owens, and the people surrounding them wouldn’t have even touched this with a barge pole. They’d have called it a crazy conspiracy theory. Now they’re entertaining it to a large degree. Surely that’s got to be better. Surely there’s going to be lots of people who would have never even talked about our talking points who are now at least considerate them.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, I mean, I hope you’re right about that. I think that, again, the Snooki effect, right? I believe it was D and G or one of these luxury handbag companies used to pay the reality TV star Snooki to carry their rivals bag in order to lower the value prestige of the rivals company. So I fear that there could be some of that going on now. It’s not the entire thing. These conversations are happening organically because of how world affairs are turning out.

 

So I guess we’ll just have to see with time what the natural effect of this is. But I only find it suspicious that they surgically make sure that we are silenced while these people are boosted. I find that to be odd. That’s all I’m saying. And when something doesn’t add up, when you see that two plus two equals five, just ask a few questions. Not saying I have some proof or anything. I’m just saying let’s wait and see a bit before running our victory laps with this one.

 

Mark Collett: Well, as I said, ….

 

So this is how I see it. Musk hasn’t given us everything we want. We’ve not got the moon on a stick, but we have got more than we had before. And not only have we got more than we had before in terms of free speech on the platform, we have more big content creators who used to be the Zionist playpen. So Candice Owens was one of Shapiro’s girls. She did what Shapiro told her to do. She said what she was meant to say. She was meant to be the base black lady that talked about wokeness but didn’t step out of her playpen. She is now broken out of the playpen and is running riot, saying things that Shapiro is very uncomfortable with her saying.

 

And I think we’ve got to look at things and say:

 

“Hey, ultimately, the cup is half full now. It’s not perfect. We’ve not got the moon on a stick!”

 

You know, she’s not turning up there with a vast and encyclopedic knowledge of how what happened in and around World War Two led to a New World Order, which changed the fundamental value system of the West, ushered in western liberal democracy, which was basically the foundation for our racial annihilation, the destruction of the family unit, and ultimately the replacement of White people. She couldn’t put it in that manner yet because she’s not where we are as people, but she’s on the road to being where we are. Well, yeah, I mean, look, also, I’m not.

 

Eric Striker: I’m not saying. I’m not attacking her just for that, but I’m saying, how come there’s no White men? Maybe damned military, right? Where are the White men? Like, pretty chat, right? He’s the only one, though. Where are the other White men that stand up and say these things? I mean, I find that suspicious as well. What? There’s no Whites who can defend Whites now? Why do we need to go through blacks to defend our race like that? Doesn’t even make any sense.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’ll tell you why. I’ll tell you why, Eric, and this is going to blow your mind!

 

In fact, if that crazy hairdo doesn’t lift up an inch with this mind blowing, this mind blowing take, I don’t know what will happen.

 

Eric Striker: I’m gripping myself. I’m bracing yourself.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m telling you this now. People like Sargon of Akkad and other people who are, you know, influencers with huge followings, they know about the JQ, they know about it and but they’re too sort of media savvy and too invested in their production companies and the money they’re making and their positions to say anything. He knows we’re being replaced. He knows who’s doing it. And he knows what’s going on in Gaza is evil, but he’s too savvy to talk about it.

 

Candace Owens, on the other hand, she has a problem with impulse control. So when she hears something that interests her rather than thinking, is this going to be good for my long term bank balance and my ability to stream on YouTube and employ 20 people and attend conferences and travel all over the world, she says:

 

“I’ve heard this mind blowing thing. I’ve got to tell you all.”

 

And sometimes someone with that kind of low impulse control who hears something that blows their mind and wants to tell the world, is more useful than the slightly more intelligent, calculated individual that decides that some form of regulated speech and calculated cowardice is going to be more financially productive for them. And Candace is that person. Her and Dan Bilzerian, they’re not going to be Mensa members. But because of that, when they hear about a conspiracy, they don’t think to themselves:

 

“Is this going to make me look mad?”

 

They think:

 

“I’ve got to warn the world!”

 

Eric Striker: Why?

 

Let me ask you, though, let me ask you, though, why are they allowed to use social media freely while forget me, okay, you could say I’m a thug or I’m a hateful Nazi or whatever. What about Kevin MacDonald, who’s an academic? What about Jared Taylor, who’s a southern gentleman? What about all these people that are dignified, that do make. Yeah, they are Mensa members. These are actual Mensa members that make the White case, right? Make the case against the Zionists and the jews. How come they’re not allowed to use.

 

Mark Collett: I can tell you why. I can tell you why. Because Candice Owens, she built herself a much, much bigger audience, a much bigger platform, and she has numerous what are basically regarded as reputational shields. She is an African-American female with a huge conservative audience. That would be very noticeable if she disappeared for raising these issues. Somebody like me, 60,000 Twitter followers in our movement. That’s a good number. It was an exceptional number before the big cull. If I’d been allowed back properly, I’d probably be on 100, 4150 thousand now, maybe more. But still, Kevin Macdonald, myself, you know, even David Duke, they are small fry in terms of followers compared to Candice. And she has those reputational shields and she is somebody who was put on this pedestal. You see me and you, we’ve never been put on a pedestal. No one has ever said, right, you’ve got to listen to Mark and Striker.

 

Whereas for years the establishment Conservatives were going, Candace Owens is the one to listen to. So taking her down is now a lot harder than taking us down.

 

Eric Striker: I have to say. I remember 20 16, 20 17, 20 18. Before the big crackdown, people like Ian Miles Chung used to come on my show for exposure. Seriously, if you remember the heel turn days, we used to get thousands of live viewers with big actual guests. You’re allowed to use YouTube freely to grow. And we did. I disagree. I think our message is popular. I think we can be put on a pedestal.

 

And I think we actually make the compelling arguments without talking about reptiles and UFO’s and Masonic cults and child sacrifices. I’m serious. Like I sort of got. I mean, you don’t agree with me that there’s something on.

 

Mark Collett: No, I agree with you, mate. Look, I’m not saying we shouldn’t be put on a pedestal, but what I’m saying, I was there, mate. 2016, millions of views on individual videos, videos that went viral being retweeted by Donald Trump junior and sitting Congressman. I loved it!

 

But the fact is, it’s still not a blip on what she built and her mainstream acceptance. You know, she was the kind of person that was interviewing Donald Trump. And I’m just, look, I’m not putting you down or me down, but I know when someone’s a bigger creator than me, I can deal with that. I’m a big boy. Should I have more followers? Yes. Should I be on Twitter? Yes. Should I have my YouTube reinstated and unthrottled so I can get a million subs? Absolutely! My talking points were lapped up on YouTube. I had videos which in the first hour, were getting 27,000 views and people going mad for them.

 

But the fact is, I was bannable because I was a smaller name, whereas somebody like Candice is a bigger name. Whether that’s right or wrong, I don’t know. I can. I can live. I’m happy to live in a shell.

 

Eric Striker: It’s not personal. My idea here is that we. It’s not that it’s a fair race. Candace Owens. I’ve actually reported on this. Candace Owens was discovered on a modeling website by a bunch of jews about five years ago. So, like, it’s not like she’s someone who is purely organic. That’s just this more charismatic or compelling figure. She was astroturfed, Mark, and that’s something that I find is very common with these Twitter people. They’re astroturfed by, oftentimes, our moral racial enemies.

 

And in the case of Candace Owens, Lauren Boebert, all of these figures in the conservative movement, they were all discovered on a modeling website before they were ever political, given a script, brought into the conservative movement. This is how it works in America. It’s not like in England, where over there, you have a different way, like, people like, you actually have. As silly as the Tories are, there are actual Right-wing intellectuals in England.

 

In America, it’s literally just a bunch of actors and actresses and models that are recruited by Rudy Giuliani, by people in the GOP, in order to basically have a lot of sex appeal and tick off a couple of diversity boxes. The worst of DEI. And that’s the real story of Candace Owens, why she’s now doing some degree of anti-jew stuff up for debate. Maybe it is sincere. Maybe she has taken her own path. All I’m saying, though, is its not, like, personal, like:

 

“Oh, I’m jealous, or whatever. It’s about the fair competition in the marketplace of ideas.”

 

They actively crush us while actively boosting these people. And I don’t think that is ultimately to our benefit in the long term. That’s just my view on that.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think it is to our benefit. I think the more people that talk about our issues, it’s a good thing.

 

And from my perspective, if we. If we only limit people if we only limit people to talking about our issues, if they completely understand them and are completely 110% on our level, then there’s going to be a lot fewer people talking about the issues that we wish to actually speak about. And when people come to big, complex issues such as the issues that you and I are very, very well versed in. What ends up happening is those people almost need to completely re-educate them themselves, and they need to do a lot of learning.

 

So when you come to issues of race realism, of jewish or Zionist power, you have to completely change your way of thinking. Things are no longer just Left and Right. They’re no longer just Labour and Conservatives. They’re no longer just, well, immigration has gone a little too far because, you know, well meaning idiots opened the borders thinking they were going to make a utopian world. They’ll happily reverse that when they realise they were wrong. You know, all of a sudden things change and you go through a re-education process. And that re-education process can take years, probably even take a decade or more for some people who really dive into these things.

 

And I think there are people in the mainstream or who have been in the mainstream who are now talking about our issues are going through sort of an educational process. And those people are fundamentally finding their feet now. And I can’t really castigate somebody like Candice for finding her feet.

 

And I’m going to give her the benefit of the doubt that she’s being honest and open now. If she turns out she’s not people can replay this stream and laugh at me and say:

 

“Oh, she’s gone back on it.”

 

Or I. But I was listening to her Twitter space, and I’ve got to say, she sounded like a lot of people that I know who, when they first started finding out about these things, were struggling to put all the dots together. And maybe we’re not on Twitter not just because we were politically active, but because if we were on Twitter, we’d have helped her join the dots. I don’t know. I think there’s a lot of complexity to this, but I do think she’s doing, you know, she’s waking up people that we would never have reached.

 

Eric Striker: Yep. I mean, you could make that argument. We’ll just have to wait and see. Again, what we’re doing is, at least in my case, distinct from what she’s doing. She’s promoting a sort of reactionary Christian nationalism that is multiracial, that is for miscegenation, that is for things that I’m not for now. Could it be a shoehorn? And through other ideas, very possible.

 

However, the Overton Window theory that getting a black woman to say something moves the Overton Window. I don’t have evidence for that. I have to wait and see. Let’s figure it out here.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, well, there are some other things we were going to talk about, but that was a very interesting discussion.

 

Obviously, we led with Pavel Durov, we led with what’s happening on Twitter, we led with the censorship and the fact that maybe, maybe some of this heavy handed censorship is to scare people, maybe it’s not.

 

But I will say this.

 

One thing we were going to discuss was the Notting Hill carnival. We might discuss that later if we’ve got time. But something else that does seem to have gone on turbo, since Labour have got in and Labour have only, you know, Labour have been in for less than 100 days, but they’ve already cut winter fuel allowance for 10 million pensioners in England and Wales.

 

And a lot of this seems to be going to fund a proposed amnesty for 44,000 illegal immigrants, which, you know, some people have costed, will end up essentially setting the taxpayer back 18 billion pounds. Because as soon as these people are given to amnesty, they will all be eligible, you know, for healthcare, for housing, for financial benefits, dental work, all manner of different benefits that will be given to them.

 

And when I say, people say:

 

“Well, healthcare, you know, everyone gets healthcare.”

 

Yeah, but not everyone gets interpreters when they’re in hospital. You know, if I go to the hospital with a with my wife, because she’s going to give birth. Well, it just happens, you know, somebody comes in, the midwife comes in, she helps you. If you see a migrant taking their wife into hospital to give birth, well, yeah, they have a midwife, and that costs money.

 

But they also have an interpreter who’s getting paid 30 pounds an hour or more to stand there and be the middleman. You know, these people cost the taxpayer a huge amount of money.

 

But I think this is quite interesting because it basically gives you an insight into what the British government have got planned for native Brits over the next five years. Because if within the first hundred days, they’ve already broken their promise about not scrapping winter fuel allowance, they’ve already. And this might be something else you’re interested in, Eric, before you give your take, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves also made big promises that they would ensure that fuel duties, that fuel costs didn’t rise, and only did they say they would protect the winter fuel allowance. But they assured people that Labour would be the party that prevented gas and electric bills rising any further. You know, they were going to be the party of the people. But within a hundred days they’ve said:

 

“Well, not only we taking away your fuel allowance, but your bills are going to rise and basically deal with it.”

 

Eric Striker: I’ve been following the Labour Party’s development on this specific issue, and part of the reason I think this is a bigger story than internationally even, is that if there is a war in the Middle East, which could break out any second, price of oil will go up 100%. It will be something unthinkable. How are people going to heat their homes? War could break out. Iran, Israel, Israel, Lebanon. With the with the British military involved, any second. All that would cause devastation, a devastating surge in gas prices and oil prices.

 

And here, with all of this happening, you have the Ukraine, and then if that happens, the one, two punch people will freeze to death. And that’s the subsidy that they want to cut. They don’t want to cut the support for the Ukraine, they don’t want to cut the interventions. That ridiculous intervention the British Navy is doing in Yemen. What does that have to do with the British people? Why is the British navy fighting the Houthis in Yemen?

 

There’s no actual purpose for that other than to drag Britain into a war in France. If you’re following the budget controversies in the European Union, where they have a central commission, right, and they make sure all EU members have a balanced budget or are working towards a balanced budget. Well, the McCrone government is racking up debt like crazy, and now I believe next month they’re going to be presenting another budget. It’s going to be also in the red. And there’s a debate going on about whether the Eudez will actually tell them to make more cuts.

 

So you see this again in all the vassal states, France and the UK, in particular countries that are sinking in debt, balance of payments crisis. This is going to harm the people above all.

 

And I think the reason they’re rushing to put in all these new surveillance mechanisms, passing these new Hate Speech laws, passing new laws against people being able to protest in the street, is an anticipation for these extremely hard economic times that are right over the horizon. That’s my view.

 

Mark Collett: I agree.

 

And I’ll say this, though, looking at this is a form of indirect discrimination.

 

Now, pensioners in this country, when you look at the demographic pyramid, are overwhelmingly White British. So White Britons make up 74.4% of the population overall.

 

And when you look at how the population pyramid is composed, the White pensioner that the pensioners that will be having their fuel allowance taken away, they will probably be 95% plus White British.

 

So this disproportionately affects the indigenous population which is a form of indirect discrimination. If you took away healthcare for people suffering from rickets in the UK, well, that would disproportionately affect people from an African or an Afro-Caribbean background, because people from Afro-Caribbean backgrounds are more likely to suffer from vitamin D deficiencies and the subsequent bone problems that result.

 

So if you were to say:

 

“Well, from now on, we’re cutting all help with that.”

 

People would say that’s an indirect form of discrimination because it disproportionately affects the Afro Caribbean community and this disproportionately affects the White British community.

 

And I think this needs to be pointed out, I think this needs to be hammered home, because fundamentally, I believe that all the cuts that the Labour Party will make in the coming months and years will all be forms of indirect discrimination that disproportionately affect the White British. I don’t know if you’ve got a take on that. And, well, actually, I’ve got another thing to throw to you. Before this, I remember something similar happening to this in America where black youths were wearing their jeans or their trousers sagging down so you could see their underwear, you could see sort of their boxer shorts or their pants underneath and their bums were hanging out. And a number of shops said, look, this is obscene. You know, we don’t allow people into the shop who are naked and we’re not allowing people coming in that are showing their underwear as such. You know, we have a policy on not showing your undergarments in the shops, so no one is allowed in wearing these sagging pants.

 

And as soon as that policy was passed, you had all these people coming forward and saying:

 

“Well, this is an indirect form of discrimination because White people don’t wear their jeans like that. The only people that wear their jeans like that are black youth.”

 

So basically you’re saying no blacks allowed via a different method.

 

And I think it’s time that we as White people started using these same methods of attack against the system. Because I believe this is indirect discrimination. It blatantly is, by their metric.

 

So we should use that term.

 

Eric Striker: Well, first and foremost, the United Kingdom is not America. You know, you can make an argument like Alexi de Tocqueville who said America has three root races, right? Indians, Africans, Europeans. They have been here the entire time. One could make that argument.

 

But in the United Kingdom, all non-Europeans, all non-indigenous British people are guests of the British people, of the White British people. That’s it!

 

There is no such thing as a non-White British person.

 

And so when there isn’t enough money to go around for pensioners to have heat in the winter, then it’s time to make different calculations. Because when you have pensioners going without heat in the winter while putting migrants who are illegally in the country in five star hotels, and the government is paying for that one, well, that is a situation where the guests are being treated better than the actual owners of the home.

 

And so I think that making these types of arguments that it’s an island, it’s a crowded island, resources are scant, there’s no jobs. This is something I always say to people immigrate to Britain for various reasons, but primarily it’s for economic reasons.

 

So my argument to people from the non-European world immigrating to Britain is, what are you even doing there? The native Englishmen don’t even have decent jobs anymore. What are you doing there? There’s nothing to do there. Unless you are, like you said, a City of London financier, or more accurately, a Wall Street financier, engaging in leveraged bias, looting British companies, productive British companies. The story of the Cadbury Egg company economy being bought out by foreign multinationals, looted with the quality declining, pulling out all this economic activity from the UK and just simply flooding it with exports, there’s nothing there for the English. The English are having problems feeding and clothing themselves and heating their homes. Why do people keep going there? That’s, I think the most compelling argument to make is you have a home. The English people only have England. That is their only home.

 

People from India and Pakistan, people from Africa, people from the Caribbean, they have a home. Okay? You have eaten all the food in your guests refrigerator. The party’s over. Time to go home. That’s my logic with this. Okay? It’s very simple. And the shocking thing about the UK is that no matter which party you vote for, you get the same immigration policy, you get the same policies on free speech and liberty to actually describe things that are right in front of you. The land of George Orwell and the birthplace of liberalism and the idea of free speech has no free speech.

 

So what is the point of even voting? I think this is where the English, and the British in general, are ahead of Americans and that you guys have discredited your phony Conservative Party, which, if you read Lord Ha ha, Oswald Moseley’s right hand man, if you read twilight over England, he says in there in like 1930s, he says the Tories have never conserved anything. He was saying this 100 years ago.

 

And so the destruction of the Conservative Party, the revelation that all the parties are basically the same thing is going to lead to a new consciousness in Britain about these very questions that we’re debating.

 

And I think this is an exciting moment in history, despite all of the problems that are over the horizon, the big crackdowns and so on.

 

At the end of the day, the government in Britain is facing this crisis of confidence where it cannot feed, clothe or provide central heating to its population.

 

So what is there to do, then? Right.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you for that. Let’s do some of these Superchats. If you haven’t donated but you want to donate, there’s still an hour left of the show, so here goes. Desalin 715. Thanks so much said. I don’t think Telegram will be going anywhere. It’s too valuable a source of Intel and tool of disinfo for various state actors. Instead, Durov will likely strike a deal to curtail its more illegal content piracy, CSAM, while allowing CIA, Israeli Ukrainian honey pots to continue. I don’t think that will happen. Do, you know what I think is going to happen? I think Durov will be given two choices. I think he will either capitulate to the West and walk out of there and make his home here in the West, or he will go back to mother Russia. The Russians will get him out of there and he will capitulate to them and they will say:

 

“Look, we are going to give you all the free speech you want in everywhere except for Russia, and we will protect you, we will look after you, and basically, we will do a deal.”

 

And I think Putin’s a very, very calculating man. He’s a very intelligent man.

 

And I think he can see the fact that the Russians have done everything they can to get hold of Durov while he’s been in captivity in France. While they’ve demanded consular access to him, the Russian press have been completely on his side. I think there’s going to be some deals made.

 

Now, we could obviously go down the third route and say:

 

“No, no, no, I am going to go it alone. I’m going to be a stateless individual. I’m going to try to find somewhere in the world that embodies my values.”

 

But I think that would be the hardest option for him. I don’t know. What do you think, Striker?

 

Eric Striker: Yeah. I’m actually impressed by the Kremlin putting aside their difference with Durov to defend them here.

 

One thing I will disagree with you on is the idea that Google and Apple and all these hosts for apps will ever take Telegram off unless they absolutely need to, because Telegram is infinitely valuable to western intelligence agencies in the Mossad, it’s the number one most used messaging a in the post Soviet space. It’s got a billion users. People in Gaza use it, people in Russia use it. People in Ukraine use it’s Belarus, the entire Belarus rioting where they tried to overthrow the government with sponsorship of MI6 and the CIA. That whole thing was planned and organised through Telegram.

 

So the question is, are they willing to sacrifice this access to these populations, in order to stave off the little bit of backwash like people organising in England against immigration or organising in France, the Yellow Vest riots used it. Or getting the word out about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians. These things are sort of delicate balances. What’s absolutely true, though, is free speech will lose in the end.

 

But it’s perhaps naive to think that it ever even existed.

 

The idea that someone can take on state actors and allow pure freedom, eventually someone is going to step in and put a gun to your head and make you choose.

 

And I think that Durov should choose the Kremlin. That’s my opinion. They’re the least worst option because you cannot compare the amount of hate speech and regulations on speech in the West compared to Russia. Okay? Yes, they have them in Russia as well, but it’s nothing even close to what it is in the West where they get you for a retweet in England. Like, it’s just an absurdity. Okay? The West is the enemy of free speech. They cannot let Whites speak. It cannot allow any criticism of jews.

 

Because if you allow even a little bit, it’s the damn breaking effect. Okay? Because that’s how bad the legitimacy crisis is.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I agree. And I’ll go a little bit further.

 

Actually, though, Telegram wasn’t the primary site used to arrange anti-migrant protests in the UK. It was actually Twitter and Facebook, the sites which were awash with the information, with Twitter and Facebook and the primary person pushing it. The press have blamed Tommy Robinson, who’s out of the country at the moment. But the vast majority of stuff that went on and the vast majority of arrests, I haven’t heard of any Telegram arrests so far. The arrests were actually Facebook and Twitter.

 

So, you know, take that as you will.

 

Eric Striker: There you go.

 

Mark Collett: But because most of the people involved in those disturbances were just normal average Joe’s, they don’t even know that Telegram exists. They were sort of the angry people off the street that don’t know about the likes of you and me. If you say to them, who’s the biggest nationalist in Britain? The only person they’ve heard of is Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson.

 

Eric Striker: I have to say, though, here in the United States, sometimes it’s easy for Europeans, I understand why, to look at us with rose tinted glasses. But I’ll tell you, just to demonstrate the amount of control there is even in this country. Me, a small time journalist, when I was doing my journalism, and I was exposing stories of illegal conduct, criminal conduct from groups like the FBI, from the ADL, organising rapes and honey pots and so on, I exposed some of these in the capacity of a journalist, using my full First Amendment rights. And the government, US government’s response was to place me on the terrorist watch list.

 

So I was harassed everywhere. I flew, I was followed. They were going through my wallet, my everything at the airport.

 

So if they’re doing that to a little guy like me, just doing little, like blog journalism, I don’t know how much any social media company in the purview or the American sphere of influence, how much freedom and an actual earnest liberty and right to speak you can have without lots and lots of qualifications. That’s just my opinion on that.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. John might be gay gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Thanks from, shekels your way, Mark. I really hope you can become the next Mosley that England so desperately needs. Wishing you and PA nothing but the best. Warm regards from the United States.”

 

Well, thank you so much! $5 came from Dad. Thank you very much, said:

 

“Mark and, Striker, do you have any thoughts on the nationalist process in Leipzig, which involved various individuals, all of whom were, of course, registered and stopped by the police?”

 

I haven’t even heard of those protests. Have you Striker?

 

Eric Striker: I saw. I think he’s speaking of a German nationalist protest in a train station where they were there, and it looked kind of like a soccer firm. It’s very unique to the east German scene, where there’s a lot of mixing between soccer firms. And it’s very working class, very similar, actually, to the British nationalist movement. But they were there saying some pretty edgy things.

 

But even if you are registered and photographed, at some point you have to say something. Look at what they’re doing to Germany. Okay? Like, they’re going to photograph you, they’re going to register you, but you have to fight for your country anyway. That’s just my opinion on that you have to be careful. Try not to break the law. Try not to do that. But you have to fight for your country.

 

At some point, someone has to do something. And going out and protesting for Germany. Germany for Germans is a perfectly legitimate cause regardless of what the illegitimate German government says.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you, Dewey von Swindlestein gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great screen guys. If people want a great education in geopolitics past, present and future, check out Strikers work. He has great taste and knowledge of Scotch also!”

 

On, do you like lots of Scotch? Striker. Are you a heavy drinker?

 

Eric Striker: I’m not as heavy as people assume.

 

Mark Collett: But, yeah, people on the Internet claim that you like this sort of, yeah, whiskey soaked mess. Is that the case?

 

Eric Striker: Oh, people on the Internet think I’m a drinking, womanizing, whatever. Most of it true. The only reason I don’t drink more is that Scotch is really expensive.

 

So I just literally just wet my lips and enjoy the flavours.

 

Mark Collett: Enjoy the flavours. The stuff tastes disgusting!

 

Eric Striker: Oh, how dare you? Have you ever had a spade burn 15, Mark?

 

Mark Collett: I haven’t, but I whiskey out, my friend. It’s all, look, it’s passable. It’s passable. But I’m not a big fan, to be honest.

 

To be honest, when I used to have a drink, which wasn’t very often, I used to like a gin and tonic because gin is very flavourful, and you can get lots of different mixes of gin. There’s a lot of different aromas, a lot of different flavours, a lot of different things added in, and it can be mixed with a variety of different sort of fruits to bring out the flavour. So I quite like that. I quite like that. But I’m off the alcohol more or less 100%. The problem with drinking, for me, is I start to say what I really, really think, which can be quite insulting to people that I regularly hold in my emotions over.

 

And secondly, so basically, if you think now that I can be quite cutting and maybe slightly go too close to the bone, well, if I’ve had a drink, I’m going all the way through the bone, through the marrow, and out the other side.

 

And secondly, I tend to find if I have a drink, I wake up the next day and I don’t want to be alive.

 

So I don’t like that feeling of a hangover.

 

Eric Striker: Ah, see, I’m the opposite. Anyone who’s actually been out drinking with me will tell you that I turn into a Teddy bear. A very affectionate, very nice, much nicer than when I’m sober. So I’m the opposite.

 

Mark Collett: Do you become one of these big emotional boobs that likes to cry on everyone’s shoulders and hugs.

 

Eric Striker: I don’t know if I cry on people’s shoulders, but I like to hug people and make jokes and have a good time.

 

Now, if I was a guy who drank and got really violent, which I do in my twenties, I had a few instances like that, but I’m well behaved.

 

The one thing you’re right about, once you pass a certain time in your thirties, boy, do you feel it. You gotta plan two days in advance. You got three weeks, and you gotta plan out a whole week. That’s real bad. No, that I agree with. That I agree with you see, you’d.

 

Mark Collett: Be the worst person to be paired with me for a drinking session because as you got all sort of huggy and touchy feely, I’d be like:

 

“Look, I need to hit this guy as hard as I can in the liver so he collapses!”

 

Then I’m going to walk out claiming he’s had a heart attack. The ambulance will come, I’ll go home, sober up, play some Mario Kart, and I’ll call him in the morning and try to claim it was all an accident.

 

Eric Striker: Well, good luck hitting me in the liver. So it’s so hardened and you’re just gonna break your hand. It’s so pickled and hardened that you just hurt yourself, my friend. And there goes your Mario Kart. Look, there you go.

 

Mark Collett: I’m a bad guy when I’m drunk as well, because I will tell everyone what I think of them. And if especially if I’m in a public place, I will not be able to keep any of my opinions trapped inside. Like, my verbal diarrhoea goes up to ten and intolerable people do hear about it.

 

So this is why I’ve been sober for a good decade.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, I can see the logic in that. I can see it.

 

Mark Collett: But look, if you ever do make it to Britain, by some miracle and people pay enough in Superchats, you and I should do some mad online drinking game.

 

Eric Striker: Well, I gotta say, Mark, to be honest, if I had one dream, if I had to die tomorrow and I had one dream, it would be to see some of the distilleries in Scotland, the idol of distilleries in particular. I love those. It’s just such a it would be such an amazing experience.

 

Mark Collett: If you come to. If you ever come to England, you and I will do that. I’ll make that promise here and, …

 

Eric Striker: Oh, my God! All right. Hopefully I’m not banned. I never got some of the other Alt-Right people, they all got letters from McQueen telling them to never set foot in the country. It was like a little. A little cutesy. Someone showed me the envelope. It was like a cutesy, like, little from her Majesty.

 

And then you open it, says, don’t you ever sent in our fucking country! We’re gonna.

 

So I haven’t received one of those yet. So we’ll see. Maybe maybe one day I’ll be able to get.

 

Mark Collett: And also, Striker, do you know, why I have a functional, loving relationship with a wonderful family? Ah, it’s because I don’t go out drinking. The problem is, when you go out drinking, you can become a little bit flirty. It does bring out sort of the jovial, slightly womanizing, you know, cheeky younger Mark which, …

 

Eric Striker: You’re on video, I would say:

 

“Hey, I would say, turn the video off and say it later, because you’re going to get yourself into some trouble, my friend. You literally, …”

 

Mark Collett: I don’t drink. I don’t drink.

 

But when you do drink, you see, that’s the problem. When you’re drinking and you go out and you’re single, nobody looks at you.

 

But when you’re drinking and you go out and you’re happily married and you’re in a good relationship, it’s like you give off these pheromones, and every available woman in the place is like:

 

“Oh, look, drinking, married man. Let’s go and talk to.”

 

Eric Striker: That’s why, you know, that’s the problem is you have a few drinks, they try to take advantage of you, and they I mean, I have to watch out. You know, you’re right. You’re right. No, like I say, what parking?

 

Mark Collett: What clean living guy. I prefer to be at the gym, going for a run weekend out in the countryside with the family that is the man that I am today.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah. If I had kids and a family, I’d probably do the same. You know, I can’t.

 

But, you know, me, I’m sort of an older bachelor type, so, you know how it is.

 

Mark Collett: But you’re not as old as me, are you?

 

Eric Striker: I’m. How old are you?

 

Mark Collett: I’m 43.

 

Eric Striker: No, no, no, I’m not that.

 

Mark Collett: I mean, you look hideously ravaged, but I didn’t think you were as old.

 

Eric Striker: As you should see me on the inside. No, no, no! But you’re absolutely right! It’s a good thing to be clean living I know that I’m a bad example. Don’t follow my example.

 

But, you know, it is what it.

 

Mark Collett: Is we should do. We should do one of those, like, one of those sort of shows where you have to live with me for a week doing my things, then I have to live with you for a week doing your things, and we’ll see whether we kill each other by the end of the fortnight.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, well. Well, I would. I’ll take you up on that.

 

Mark Collett: Anyway, let’s move on.

 

Thank you so much for the Superchat. Feminine Revival gave $25. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thank you for a nice afternoon show with a little man waving.”

 

Well, thank you, my dear. Generous British Gammon gave $25. Thank you, my friend. Always good to see you here. And he said:

 

“People I know who watch a lot of mainstream media are saying that Starmer is coming across as incompetent and out of his depth. When he was heckled in Southport, he certainly looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights. Do you think he’ll still be PM by the next election?”

 

Well, I’ll say this. Starmer came into the electoral period with a record lead over Rishi Sunak. He has now dropped 16 points in the polls in less than 100 days. It’s almost like he came in, gone into power, and somebody said:

 

“Look, boss, no one could tank it as hard as Sunak did!”

 

And Starmer just turned his head and said:

 

“Hold my drink!”

 

Took the control of the plane and just nose dived into oblivion. Like this guy. He’s sort of the British Biden in terms of approval ratings.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah.

 

And this is what every western democracy is going to look like from now on, you’re going to have prime ministers and presidents with a 25-30% approval rating. And this is just how it’s going to be from now on. You know, stormwater never had a chance. Okay. Everybody was saying just give them a few days in office and the honeymoon will be over.

 

Now, the question is, though, what’s going on with the Tory Party? Are there just no White men that can be prime minister? Conservative prime ministers? Because from my understanding, the new leaders of the Tory Party are all like, Indians. They have a new batch of Hindus. Is that true?

 

Mark Collett: What it is the Conservative Party are fundamentally stuck because they know that they’re actually the default winners of every election. Because most Brits are against immigration, transgender progressivism. They want a traditionalist small government. You know, stay out of my backyard and don’t bring the immigrants here. That’s what they want. But most Conservatives want the opposite of that because they’re just career politicians.

 

However, there are a number of non-White Conservatives who have, like the Candice Owens reputational shield because they’re black or Indian, or a black woman or an Indian woman. So they can talk about immigration in much harsher terms than Whites without having the word racist screamed in their face.

 

So the Tories believe that if they bring somebody in, like Preeti Patel or Kemi Badenoch, and put them at the forefront, they can go a lot harder on immigration. So Starmer will stand there saying:

 

“We need to flood the country.”

 

Then the based black woman will stand there and go:

 

“No, we need to stop them coming in!”

 

And people will be like:

 

“Well, she can’t be racist because she’s black. We’ll vote for them!”

 

And you’re laughing, but that is literally the Conservative Party’s thought process. It’s put somebody up front who isn’t White.

 

So when they talk about immigration, we can’t be called racist. That is their plan to get back to power.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah.

 

And I think that that’s a product of not being able to choose your presidents. Someone like Priti Patel would even be competitive in an American election, as bad as things are. Even Kamala Harris, who’s the equivalent, was never elected. She was chosen, cherry picked and put, never won a single delegate in the primary.

 

So I think that’s actually these sort of affirmative action prime ministers, or a product of the sort of Parliamentary system where for Americans that don’t know, in England, you vote for a party and the party picks the prime minister, the people don’t get a say.

 

But I think they made it pretty clear that they’re not comfortable with a Rishi Sunak in the last election that I do see.

 

Mark Collett: Well, the problem with Rishi Sunakhe was it was a bit sort of too little, too late.

 

And what I mean by too little, too late is too many Tory prime ministers had said how they were going to fix the problem and those Tory prime ministers didn’t fix the problem. And by that time, they didn’t trust the Tories. There was all kinds of problems. And Sunak washing was a weak Weasley little man and he didn’t appeal to people and they shot themselves in the foot.

 

But do I think Starmer will be PM by the next general election? I think he will because he has such a majority.

 

But I think at the next general election, and this is going to, if the next general election was held tomorrow, I think the following would happen. The Tories would make back some seats, not many, but some Labour would have a massively reduced majority, but would still win. And the major benefactor would be the Reform Party. They came 30, they got 34 second places. Farage would be the big winner, and people would then start to look at Farage like a more serious player. And over time, that would damage the Conservatives and put major, major pressure on the establishment to do something about immigration. That’s where it would be going.

 

But that said, who knows what’s going to happen in four to five years? And who knows when the next general election is going to be? Because Starmer has the privilege. He can call it whenever he wants. He could call it. He could call another general election tomorrow if he wanted. I doubt he’s going to do that, but he has the privilege.

 

So I think he will call it, you know, he won’t leave it the full five years. I doubt very much, but who knows what’s going to happen? Who knows what could cause it to be called?

 

Anyway, Derwski gave $5. Thanks so much:

 

“Good take. Some of these mainstream people are using our talking points for their own purpose and may even water down the message.”

 

Well, that’s why we’ve got to hold their feet to the fire. And I just wish that Candace Owens had me on. That’s all! I wish.

 

Eric Striker: Let me ask you a question. Why is it these people bring on Theo Vaughn and talk to him about David Duke, but they don’t bring on David Duke?

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, I know that, you know.

 

Eric Striker: I like, and, hey, I have nothing against the Ovon, but I saw an interview with Tucker Carlson, and Tucker Carlson is like:

 

“Oh, you live with David Duke, huh? You were his neighbour.”

 

And Theo Vaughn’s like:

 

“Yeah, he’s a nice guy.”

 

And then Tucker Carlson’s like:

 

“Well, David Duke’s a fan. Well, why don’t you bring him on and ask him, like, why don’t you interview him? What are you afraid of? What’s Theo Vaughn got to say that David Duke doesn’t as a political commentator?”

 

Right. Think of it from that perspective. There’s a lot. I have a less I have a less optimistic view of these people. Something stinks about them, in my opinion.

 

But again, we already know. We have our opinions on this.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, we do have our opinions on this.

 

And I will say this. Obviously, I know that these people aren’t our people, but they’re doing something. And look, David, I speak to David Duke, and he’s happy when somebody like Candice Owens speaks about it.

 

And I think sometimes you’ve just got to be happy. If I spent my life being angry that somebody was recycling or rehashing one of my talking points without crediting me, I’d probably have stomach up by now. I just sit there and think to myself, well, you know, at least somebody’s saying it. And I can’t live my life angry all the time.

 

Eric Striker: So I don’t think it’s that sometimes these people take half of what we’re saying and then fuse it with something that’s wrong and makes what we’re saying refuted.

 

So that’s my only thing. It’s an alleyway to nowhere. Where there’s one way of looking at it, where they’re putting out their gateways to us. That’s one way to look at it.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Eric Striker: There’s another way to look at it in that these are nets, people that are coming in our direction at 100 miles an hour, flying in our direction, seeing what Israel is doing, seeing the Zionists control the 40 standing ovations for Benjamin Netanyahu, a literal war criminal who’s a fugitive, getting this from both parties in the Congress. So people see this, they’re flying in our direction, and then Candace Owens is there the rest stop to spin it off into something else. So are they gateways or are they gatekeepers?

 

And I think that’s the debate.

 

And I think there’s an argument for both sides. Right? I think there’s possibly both are happening, you know?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think it’s difficult to know when somebody, when you’ve got somebody who’s been part of the mainstream and they seem to be breaking away from the mainstream. You don’t know whether they really are breaking away from the mainstream or whether they’re an offshoot of the mainstream who’s secretly still working for the mainstream to con people into not coming to us. And it’s difficult to know, and I understand why people suspicious.

 

Eric Striker: But as I said, it’s comparable to Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson. They kind of play this role. Are they gateways or are they gatekeepers? Nigel Farage tells you to people’s faces. He says:

 

“I’m a gatekeeper. I’m the reason the BNP fell apart.”

 

Tommy Robinson will tell you the same thing:

 

“The reason why these soccer hooligans are not in the National Front and instead they’re waving Israeli flags is because of me.”

 

So when someone tells you they are, believe them. That’s my view on that.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s pretty accurate. Dying Cockney said:

 

“Real suppression is becoming a minority in your own home and being arrested for complaining about it.”

 

Very good point. Derwski gave $5. Thank you so much, said:

 

“Mark and Striker. Have you heard the new song oprah war sturm silta by flak. It’s a song about events on silt, Germany from this year.”

 

Sorry, I have not heard that.

 

Eric Striker: I haven’t heard it.

 

Mark Collett: Jez 9999 gave $5:

 

“What do you think about the fact that Pavel Durov was chosen by Klaus Schwab’s WF young global leaders to join their organisation presenting Finland?”

 

I didn’t know that.

 

Eric Striker: I don’t know anything about that, so I can’t comment.

 

Mark Collett: I mean, look, if that’s true, that is obviously concerning, and I’ll have to look into that more, but I genuinely didn’t know that. But I suppose, again, if Pavel Durov was still on the reservation, he wouldn’t be sat in a French jail cell right now. You know, at the end of the day, they don’t jail people who are playing their game. You get jailed or bumped off or lose all your money when you stop playing their game, or in some cases, when you’ve committed major criminal acts for them that can no longer be covered up.

 

But I don’t think Pavel Durov falls into that latter camp. I think people who fall into that latter camp are like you, Sam Bankman, free. He committed major criminal acts, and when it can no longer be covered up, they had to burn him.

 

But I don’t think Durov’s done any of those things.

 

Eric Striker: In the case of Durov, Western elites have played a push-pull game with him, where they’ll compliment him and bring him to their events, while at the same time saying:

 

“Hey, how come you don’t give us access? Backdoor access? Why don’t you help us out here? We’re helping you here. We’re inviting you to this event. We’re giving you good publicity for protecting you. Why don’t you give us this?”

 

Like I said, Emmanuel Macron made an effort to convince Pavel Durov to host Telegram in Paris as a sort of prestige thing for France, where he wants France to be a tech hub. He tried to bring him in. Pavel Durov said:

 

“Listen, we could. I’ll talk to you. We can be meet at events and stuff, but I’m not bringing my company to France.”

 

So it’s not as black and white as people think. They want Babel Durov to work for them. And he’s push-pulling away. And that’s the big thing here. You better believe they’re talking to him in private, saying:

 

“Listen, just give us this and we’ll let you go. We’ll make you a billionaire, we’ll give you anything you want.”

 

Right? They’re doing that as we speak.

 

So it’s a matter of the man having principles. That’s my view on that.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ll go along with that. I’ll go along with that. GoyBoy 1488. Gave 1488, thanks so much. And said:

 

“Mark, how do you get along with everyone? Striker, how do you get along with almost no one?”

 

Eric Striker: Well, I’ll say, very simple. I’ll say this, I’ll say this to me. No, that’s a joke!

 

But in all seriousness, ideas matter, okay? And I’m convinced that there’s a very specific way to save our race. I’m not here, I’m not in this movement to make friends or whatever. If I do, that’s great!

 

But ultimately I’m convinced that the only way we’re going to save our race is by doing it correct, doing it right.

 

And so when people introduce epistemic pollution into our movement with this, with wacky cockadoodle conspiracy theories and trying to introduce debates about whether we should be racialists or religious or any of that’s taking us off of our mission. And some people think that simply, politically, or ideologically disagreeing with them is a personal attack, when it’s nothing. I could care less about anyone’s personality, but I do think that doing things the right way, if you’re not going to do them the right way, you might as well not do anything. That’s just my opinion on that.

 

Mark Collett: I get on with everyone because except for a couple of bottom feeders, basically, but I get on with the vast majority of people because fundamentally, if I see somebody doing something that isn’t a hundred percent how I do it, I basically keep my mouth shut. Because if people are doing something good, I tend to let them get on with it!

 

And I like to be friends with everyone.

 

And I think the movement is better with more connections rather than fewer. And if we do have big differences with one another, maybe we should deal with those differences after we’ve achieved our goals. We can always have our little bun fights when we’re sat in Parliament rather than having our bun fights, you know, while we’re basically sat in the ghetto getting nowhere. That’s more my thing. And I just try to be friendly with everyone. And look, I like lots of people that Striker doesn’t like. And I like Striker, and I like to be friends with everyone.

 

And I’ve got to say this, I know that Striker doesn’t get on with everyone, and I value, but I do think Striker does valuable work and he wouldn’t be on the show if he didn’t. I don’t have, like, people on the show to be sort of clowns or like Jokers or people to humiliate me and Striker.

 

And also something else, right? If I think Striker’s wrong about something, I’ll have him on the show and we’ll talk about it in a respectful manner. I’m not going to write a four page like essay rubbishing him to rile him up. If he says something that really annoyed me, I would privately message him.

 

So, for example, he was meant, he made me buy a computer game because he said he was going to play it with me online. And then he didn’t play it with me online. So I sent him a message saying:

 

“Striker, you are a dickhead!”

 

And that was it. I didn’t have to do a big public post. I said:

 

“You made me buy Rome Total War Two and then never played it with me. That means you’re a jerk.”

 

Eric Striker: Hold on, who says we’re never going to play? Oh, you have to be patient, my friend. You know what?

 

Mark Collett: I’ve been waiting months to beat you at that game.

 

Eric Striker: We’ll figure something. We still have to figure it out. The problem for me is finding a decent team. Because you British guys, you’re all into the esports. You just sit a record because it’s always raining over there.

 

So you’re inside playing the role. You’re going to embarrass us, you’re going to embarrass the Americans. So I have to find a decent team, find someone that can hold their own against you fellas, I’ll tell you this as well.

 

Mark Collett: Striker is also a giant baby.

 

So when I bought this game, I spent 60 hours practicing it, playing as Rome. And then Striker goes, by the way, don’t know when it’s gonna happen, gonna put it off for another month. A new rule. No one’s allowed to play as rome at this point. If I’d been in the same room as him, I’d have had to have been restrained. After practicing it for like 2 hours a day, for 30 days, I was, …

 

Eric Striker: Like, Rome is overpowered. Rome is overpowered. You can’t play as Rome. Come on now.

 

Mark Collett: So not only is he late to the party. He’s also got these bizarre rules that he pulls out of his backside so that you couldn’t possibly win.

 

Eric Striker: They don’t. According to the official esports from Rome Total war. Rome is banned. So that’s actually the official sports league of Rome total war.

 

Mark Collett: But it’s called Rome Total War.

 

Eric Striker: And you’re like, I know Rome. No, they’re really strong. Come on now. Come on!

 

Mark Collett: I think he had a list as well. Like, no Rome, no chariots, no elephants.

 

Eric Striker: That’s right.

 

Mark Collett: I did really enjoy. I gotta say, this is in jest though, cuz joking aside, I did play it for 60 hours, but I absolutely loved its a fantastic game.

 

And if you can get it for cheap on like a CD key site where it’s only like 8.99, Rome Total War Two Emperor Edition, it’s a lot of for seven quid or eight quid is what I paid for it. 60 hours of fun is a lot of fun. So to be fair, joking aside, I got to actually thank Striker for getting me into it and having so much fun. Although the wife wouldn’t say the same thing because the amount of times she called me down for dinner and I shouted back:

 

“Look, I’m just trying to occupy Carthage. Be gone, woman!”

 

Eric Striker: I’ve heard women actually talking about their husbands and their spouses playing map games, like military map games, and that’s apparently a thing women talk about oh, yeah, my husband’s just looking at a map and moving like a little flag on a map all day.

 

So this is apparently a common thing in our movement to play map games. Hearts of iron and so on. And we’re on toll war to a lesser extent.

 

Mark Collett: We’ll have to do a whole stream on this. I realise we’re running short on time and I could talk about this all night, so we’ll move on. Commodore’s detritus. I can’t pronounce your name, mate. Sorry. But you gave $5, which I’m very thankful for. I’ll call you Commodus Davitrus. I think that’s how it’s pronounced. He sent an Imga picture saying:

 

“Dogs on skateboards, drinking alcohol and smoking should be banned!”

 

Well, thank you for that. The Resident Baker gave $5. Thank you very much. Said:

 

“Hi, Mark, great show. Good to see Striker back on with you. What do you think about Labour’s new plans to promote eating of the insects, especially crickets? Sounds disgusting!”

 

I’ve got to say this, anyone that eats lobsters, crabs and little things that scuttle around at the bottom of the sea on, like, eight legs. Can’t whine too much about insects. They’re like the insects of the sea.

 

So I wouldn’t want to eat them myself, but I wouldn’t eat lobsters and little scuttling things. Anything that scuttles, anything that’s got more than four legs shouldn’t be eaten, basically.

 

Eric Striker: Is that what’s the problem with so they’re there. They opened up a new Cambodian restaurant in your town with. What are you talking about? Insects? Are they trying to get you to eat which insects?

 

Mark Collett: Mainly crickets. But as I said:

 

“I’m not a fan of eating like, anything, really, that’s got more than four legs. That’s just my rule.”

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, I gotta admit, I agree with you on that one.

 

Mark Collett: So that’s the rule. In the world of Collett, if it has four legs, it can be eaten. If it has more. Not for me. Chewy von Swindlestai, $5. Thank you so much!:

 

“The UK government are going to continue working with community leaders for minority. Every time there is trouble, they will eventually have to accept that we need representation.”

 

Look, I’ve already pointed this out. This works with PA.

 

So when you see these protests that go violent and there’s hundreds of police officers there, that’s not a PA protest. When you see a PA protest, there’s two police officers there, because I’m the community leader that arranges it with them, lays out boundaries and talks to them about what’s a go and what’s a no go. We have a good relationship when it comes to arranging protests, and we’ve never had anyone arrested at any of our events because we do the whole community leader thing. PA is about community building, and myself and Laura and others, in fact, have put themselves forward as community leaders for these demonstrations.

 

You know, it’s important to note that you can do it, but you have to step forward. You know, the problem is people say:

 

“We need White community leaders.”

 

But no one steps forward. Then someone does step forward and say:

 

“Well, look, come to me, speak to me, I’ll deal with the police liaison.”

 

Then a load of people get all funny and go:

 

“Oh, he’s a fed because he spoke to police liaison.”

 

Well, you know, who are you going to speak to if you’re a community leader? That’s how it works. Ok. Wire gave $5. Thank you so much! And gave thumbs up. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that greatly. Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Have a great weekend!”

 

Very kind of you and always good for your support. Thank you so much! Musket basket gave $5 and said:

 

“Test.”

 

Test worked. My friend, my good friend Stars Nikki Foroff, who’s been writing to me every day, gave $3. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Hi, Mark. No questions this time. I just want to say thank you for the show and also for you taking some time in your schedule to respond to my emails.”

 

Well, I found them very good, so thank you very much. Jay Bradley gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Striker is one of the best guests, 100% understands the JQ, along with Devon Stack. What’s both your takes on Lucas Gage and what the jews have done to him?”

 

Well, I’m not on Twitter, but I know he’s banned. I find it interesting that Musk banned him. I’m not sure why. What’s your take on this, Striker? Why has Lucas Gage been victim of the banhammer?

 

Eric Striker: I don’t know. I’ve known Lucas Gage for like a decade. It’s a very long story. He was trying. People say I don’t get along with people, but throughout the NJP, he was in the background trying to undermine this project we had on the grounds that it was racist, which is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

 

So I don’t know what’s going on with that. Again, some of this Twitter stuff, soap operas and stuff, I haven’t been following them very closely. I don’t think it’s all that consequential, personally.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, well, thank you, VM. I don’t know about it. I invited Lucas on the show. I emailed Lucas Gage and said:

 

“Would you like to come on the show and talk about it?”

 

He never responded. He didn’t get back to me. Don’t know if he didn’t see the email, the invitation. Still there. Lucas, I’ve got nothing against you. Would be happy to talk about it. Enjoyed having you on the show last time. So VM gave $5. Thanks so much:

 

“Loving War Strike. Great commute. Audio at 1.5 speed. Striker, what powers you through 8 hours of streaming coffees, cigarettes, or the raw energy of Superchat shekels?”

 

Eric Striker: Well, I got it. What might your book be about by hour six? It’s actually. Yes. The superpower of a Superchat shekel. Yes.

 

Now, I get a nice 250 milligram coffee, nitro brew coffee, and yes, plenty, and plenty of nicotine. But oh, there. There you go. There you go. What are the yellow. Those are yellow Red Bulls, right?

 

Mark Collett: Oh, yes. These are the greatest thing in the world. Tropic, limited edition, tropical. And I’m in love with them.

 

But we had a major issue in the house. The wife went out and was like, I’ve got a treat for you. I brought you a load. And they were sugar free. That was almost divorce proceedings!

 

The only thing that stopped it being a full on, like, wife versus husband wrestling match was the fact that she said:

 

“Look, I paid for them. So you didn’t financially lose out.”

 

At that point, I had to sort of begrudgingly accept that I’d just have to drink them all, which I did.

 

Eric Striker: Well, not for nothing, if it was my wife with the sugar free Red Bulls, well, there’d be a broken bottle over her head. Just saying. I mean, no, as for the book I’m writing, the I’m not going to give any details yet. We’re still in talks with the publisher. It’s going to be a history book. It’s going to be about a time period everyone’s interested in perhaps what led to the time period. And it’s going to be a great project. I’m in talks with the publisher on this, going to really focus on this. It’ll be my first book, actually, so I’m actually pretty excited about it.

 

Mark Collett: And will it be featured on Mark’s Book Club?

 

Eric Striker: Um, well, what do you have to do? What do you have to do to get on the book club?

 

Mark Collett: You just have to send me the book.

 

Eric Striker: Okay. All right, I’ll send it to you. I’ll send it to you now.

 

Mark Collett: We’ll buy copies. Don’t worry, mate, we’ll support.

 

Eric Striker: No, no, no! I’ll make sure you get a copy for sure.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. VM gave another $3. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Mark on Telegram pressure. Have you seen UK copy report where the Terragram thing came from? It’s something only mentioned by Hope Not Hate in their reports for shoehorning into hate crime legislation.”

 

So this is the thing, Striker. There was this page on Telegram called Terragram, which was meant to be sort of a White nationalist terrorist page. And it’s been alleged by a group called UK Column or UK Column have alleged that Terragram was set up by the anti-racist Hope Not Hate group specifically to get Telegrams shut down.

 

Now, I’m saying a lot of alleged here because I’m not the one. I don’t know about this. I’ve seen it. I’ve not read into it. I don’t know the full details, but those are the allegations made by UK Column about Hope Not Hate. But they are allegations and allegations I didn’t make, so don’t sue me.

 

Eric Striker: I’m not familiar with that allegation in particular, but I have done deeply reported articles on the nature of some of those extremely violent, satanic, pro-terrorism, sort of fake Nazi groups on Telegram. And they are almost always, without any exception, controlled by the American intelligence apparatus, the FBI and MI5 in particular.

 

And I’ll tell you this because I interviewed several young men who were brought into this, into these cults. And in one case, they were drugged by an undercover FBI agent. Let me repeat that they were given drugs by an undercover FBI agent who later testified in court in their case as an FBI agent. He was undercover. He gave them psychedelic mushrooms. He gave them all sorts of mind altering drugs.

 

And then there was another young man who told me this undercover FBI agent and an FBI informant named Joshua Sutter actually raped a minor. They tied down a 17 year old boy and raped him. An undercover FBI agent and an informant. This is all an article I wrote about The Order of Nine Angles. I have all of the proof in it.

 

And later on in court, it all came out. Not all the abuses, those are from interviews, but it was very well reported. So anytime you see somebody openly calling for mass shootings and blowing things up on Telegram, 90% of the time it is some kind of agent, some kind of agent provocateur, trying to either rope people in or, like he was saying, shut down Telegram as a platform, period.

 

Mark Collett: Well, similar things happened in the UK. There was a group called National Action. Their leader, called Ben Raymond, was a big weirdo. He had two people who were very close to him. One was called Ryan Fleming. He was a known paedophile. Ben Raymond kept him around despite him being convicted of a sex offence against a child. He claimed it was all a mix up. He then got taken back to jail for a separate sex offence against a child. He was another Order of Nine Angles. Freak.

 

And secondly, the other guy in National Action was a guy called Jack Renshaw, who has been jailed for attempting to groom two underage boys.

 

And all of this was floating around one of these banned groups and very, very odd behaviour. All tied in with Order of Nine Angles. Weirdos.

 

Eric Striker: Order. The Order of Nine Angles in the United States is beyond reasonable doubt, proven in court with documentation controlled by the FBI. It’s an FBI informant who’s been paid thousands of dollars every year to produce child pornography, recruit young underage people, rape them, allegations of torture allegations of indoctrination. And this is all being done with the permission, help and money of the FBI. This is a story I put out a few years ago. You can find it on UN’s still about The Order of Nine Angles.

 

So that’s all you need to know about that.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! Charlie Bowie gave $5. Thank you very much. Said:

 

“Another great show as usual. Thanks, chaps.”

 

Space Can gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“I wouldn’t call Sargon, say he’s closer to a traitor.Also, Strikers hair is awesome!”

 

Well, thank you so much, Vlad. Victorian gave $5. Thanks much. He says:

 

“I think more than civil rights for Whites, Brits should want to make more of the native American preservation route. Civil rights was all about integration and left could counter this line of thinking, and integration is extinction.”

 

Well, civil rights for White people, I think, will go down better than simply American preservation. Because I’ll tell you this now, there is no way of the British government going to give us a reservation. If the British government said to us today:

 

“Right, Mark, you can have Yorkshire as a reservation for White people.”

 

Yorkshire would be the best place in the entire world within about a decade. You know, they’re not going to give White people a reservation because it wouldn’t be a reservation. It would be paradise.

 

Eric Striker: It’s a small island. How are you going to ask for a reservation? The island is the reservation. It’s the reservation for British people. The whole island?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Eric Striker: It’s still a majority wide country. I think that the main argument, actually, the powerful argument is majority rule. If it’s good enough for South Africa, it’s good enough for Britain. Majority rule. Put immigration up for a referendum, put the existence of migrants in the country up for a referendum. Whether they should be paid to leave. Put it all up. Majority rule. It’s very simple. Okay.

 

Instead, the British government viciously suppresses the majority while allowing minorities to act however they want. That is unacceptable.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed. ScaredyCat gave $4. Thanks so much:

 

“Hi Striker and mark, best wishes.”

 

Well, thank you so much! Flying Dutchman gave $24. Thank you very much:

 

“I always knew Elvis was still alive. Thank you so much!”

 

Thank you very much. He said:

 

“Ever played Total War? Thrones of Britannia can defend the island from the Danes as the Saxons and such?”

 

I haven’t. I’ve only played Rome Two. The problem is with those sort of games, you get sucked into them for so many hours that playing one is enough. I played a civilisation on the Super Nintendo, which is like the first iteration. And even that, the most basic iteration can suck like 24, 30 hours out of you in a single game.

 

Eric Striker: It’s insane! Oh, God! Yeah. Command and Conquer. Oh, lord.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, God! I love that’s another game we should play. We’ve got a Superchat here from PA, Scotland supporter. It says:

 

“Keir Starmer’s wing of the Uni party is blaming its other wing for creating the disaster in which we now live. The Uni party’s legacy anti-White monoblock media establishment dutifully relays the Uni party propaganda on state controlled television. Where is the monoblock media still effective today?”

 

Well, on the television, I’d say this. You’ve made a very good point there.

 

And this is one of the problems with the two party system. When the new party gets in, it immediately blames the old party for all the problems and asks for a decade to sort them out, at which point they only make things worse. They switch round again and the incoming party blames the outgoing party for all the problems. And it’s just a vicious circle.

 

So that is a good point. Cathugger gave a dollar. Thank you so much, and said:

 

“Shrimp may well be the cockroach of the ocean, but it’s unbeatable with chili, lime and coconut. If cockroaches would taste like that, he would see me hunting in the streets of New York at night.”

 

I will say this shrimp are the only scuttling creature that I can tolerate in terms of taste.

 

Eric Striker: I mean, it’s because they’re generally fried. I like coconut shrimp.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, they are the only tolerable scuttling creature. That’s what I’ve got.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah. It is disgusting when you think about them, though they are discussing.

 

Mark Collett: You have to prep them as well, because if they’re badly prepped, people don’t remove their. There’s a light, a black line down the back of the shrimp, and that’s basically its poop sack. And if you don’t remove that, you’re eating the shrimp’s poop. So make sure you take that off. RoryHerbert gave $5. Thanks so much. Said:

 

“Dear Mark, I have to ask Striker his opinion on Donald Trump and does he think he will be the next president of America?”

 

Eric Striker: It’s up in the air, not looking good! Blowing the campaign, running as a conventional conservative. There’s no way to win if you’re a conventional conservative.

 

So I don’t know, a lot could change in the next few months, but for now, it’s not looking good for Trump. Not looking good!

 

Mark Collett: Oh, I completely agree. And I’ll go even further up against Biden. He was a shoe in. But since Kamala Harris has taken over, he looks rudderless and his energy seems to have dissipated.

 

Now, I think what will be the most telling indicator of where this is going to go is his first debate with Harris. That first debate with Harris will tell you really how bad things are.

 

Now obviously happens. He’s going to have a little bit of a honeymoon period, and then things will naturally swing back to Trump a little bit. You know, any incoming candidate is going to have a slight honeymoon period, but this is a candidate that I think he’s going to be able to. He’s going to be less effective dealing with Kamala Harris than he was with either Biden or Clinton. And I think he’s got big trouble.

 

And if you asked me to bet on it right now, I would bet that he doesn’t win the election.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, no, I could see that. You’re right. He looks rudderless, and I think he’s going to look really old next to Kamala Harris. And even if that doesn’t really matter as much as some consultants think, it’s going to start a debate among the Gopdhead punditry about how old he is and so on. You know, I, a few months ago, even before Biden dropped out, like three or four months ago, I was saying, for all we know, we might not even have Biden and Trump in the 2024 election. And now Biden’s down. Will Trump make it to November? I mean, who knows? Who knows? He came within inches of not making it.

 

A couple of weeks ago, he came within inches. So who knows if he’ll make it, if they’ll ask him to step down, if they’ll indict him for something? There’s so much up in the air in the clown election that making predictions even at this far into the election cycle is very difficult.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. Flayer Kate gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Hey, Mark, long time viewer, first time chatter. Cheers.”

 

Well, thank you for the $10. Iron Will gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Mark, will you be getting the Castlevania Dominus collection? Dawn of Sorrow is on there. Which is the best Castlevania game?”

 

Well, I’ll tell you this.

 

Firstly, you’re wrong. The best Castlevania game ever is super Castlevania four on the super Nintendo. That is perfect.

 

But I will say this. I have beaten all of the Castlevanias on the Nintendo nes, with the exception of Kid Dracula, that only came out in Japan. I’ve beaten both the Castlevanias on the Super Nintendo, all of the Castlevanias on the Game Boy advance, the PC Engine, Castlevania, and the PlayStation one, Symphony of the night.

 

However, I’m yet to play any of the games on the dominant collection because they came out on the three.

 

On the Nintendo DS, which is much harder to emulate, you need dual screen support, so I’m much more likely to pick that up. I will probably grab it on the Switch. I’m looking forward to it. I haven’t played them, but you’ve made a bold claim about dawn of sorrow, so I am looking forward. I am probably going to grab that. I haven’t bought any of the other collections because I got all the original games.

 

So I’m not going to buy collections of games that I’ve literally got on my shelf over there.

 

Eric Striker: So I remember the one I played. I played it for like a whole weekend without pausing, was Symphony of the night. Yeah, for PlayStation. Right. I played the other ones off and on, but that was my favourite by a lot. And that was like those games are too hard. Are they still making them?

 

Mark Collett: No, but I’ve got something big for you, if you like. If you like symphony of the night, try the three Castlevanias on the Game Boy advance. Circle of the Moon. What are they called? Circle of the Moon. I forget the names of them now, but they’re really, really good! Circle of the Moon is the least good one.

 

The other two are much better. Circle of the Moon’s a little bit rough around the edges, but still very good and very enjoyable if you like Castlevania, but if you can track down. They’re very easy to get with an emulator, very easy to set up. But the two game Boy advance ones that came after Circle of the Moon, harmony of dissonance. That’s the first one. I really love that.

 

And then the other one. Really good. Yeah, go for it. You enjoy those.

 

Eric Striker: Yeah, I haven’t played those games in like two decades, my friend.

 

Mark Collett: Do it. You will enjoy it.

 

Eric Striker: I don’t have time. I wish, I wish. Oh.

 

Mark Collett: And finally, Jewy Swindlestein gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Beagle in enthusiasts are gay.”

 

Well, thank you very much for that. I don’t know where that came from, but that brings us to the end of the show. Area of Sorrow. That’s the other one. That’s really good as well. But I slightly preferred Harmony and Dissonance. Just because. Well, I like them both. I like them both.

 

I’ve got to say this. Maybe I could be tempted into doing a Castlevania on stream again.

 

Anyway, on that bombshell, we’ve run over by six minutes. But thank you so much! Big thanks to Striker for being here. Would you like the last word, my friend, before we shut things down?

 

Eric Striker: Oh, yeah. No, just a message of support to my English friends in your national revolution. Stay steadfast. And just to plug my own stuff. Yeah, we got War Strike on Thursdays, 06:00 pm Eastern, Latoria dot Substack.com. Haven’t really been updating it much. I’m busy because I’m writing. Gonna start writing a book now, so keep your eyes peeled for that. And on Twitter if you want to find me there. It’s Twitter.com litorial ittoria 88. That’s my Twitter. I don’t use it that much, but I’m there if you want to follow me.

 

So, yeah, thanks, Mark.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much for being here. I’d just like to say, as I said, a huge thanks to Striker.

 

I’ll be back later in the week. We’ve got the Nationalist A-Team. Sunday night back with David Duke. 04:00 pm UK time on Friday. Video coming about the stabbings in Germany. That’ll be out 01:00 pm Friday.

 

And finally, we’ll be back next week with a new guest, Pox Popular. He is a new guest. Everyone asked for him. He’s agreed to come on! So, new guest next Wednesday. So just again, huge thank you to Striker for coming on. It’s been a great show. Thank you to everyone who donated so generously.

 

And finally, huge thank you to everyone who supported the show across all platforms. At peak, we had over 700 people watching live tonight. Good numbers. Absolutely solid show. Thank you. This community is wonderful! I love you all. Until next time, stay strong, keep fighting and I’ll see you same time next week. Thank you, everybody and good night.

 

[2:08:34]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/29/2024 = 897)

Mark Collett
6 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

TONYTRIDENT88
5 minutes ago
great to hear two differing opinions from friends and not have it devolve into a slap fight.(Fuentes VS Some Muslim/”Hispanic” Kitty fight) seriously we need more rational discussions amongst ourselves like this .

Mr
22 minutes ago
Great show, gents. Thank you both for your important work.

1
0
MagicManintheSky
2 hours ago
I note that the Swastika and Roman Salute are still not illegal in the Jew-K while they are both now illegal in Jewstralia. Imagine my shock.

MagicManintheSky
2 hours ago
Striker doesn’t inhale his cigarette smoke…..he swallows it.

1
0

@What3
4 hours ago
get ready brother

Taciturn
4 hours ago
stay strong brothers o/

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
o/

14Reasons
4 hours ago
no red ice today they’re on vacation BTW

3
0

@AdelaideAdair
4 hours ago
o/

DOLO
4 hours ago
Ava reposts his stuff if anyone is interested.

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago

@What3
lol, never peace brother

@Rixille
4 hours ago
Yea good stream

@dsallen7
4 hours ago
14

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
14

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
Excellent show.

@Bluenose
4 hours ago
The King

@What3
4 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
says the infirmed. keep watching kalergi ball

@Bluenose
4 hours ago
Striker looks like Elvis

7
0
DOLO
4 hours ago
Vox Populi makes really good vids.

2
0

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago

@Rixille
plus they’ve made a member of the Ultramarines as a black man…

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago

@What3
infirm

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Great show

1
0

@Rixille
4 hours ago
Buying games today is not a good idea, you’ll likely be supporting those antiwhite scum.

@What3
4 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
manage your time better

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
4 hours ago
1488

FeminineRevival
4 hours ago
bye everyone. hang in there

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
Great show and chat. Night folks.

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
o/

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago

@What3
time sink

DOLO
4 hours ago
o/

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Hitler_Respecter
based

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

@What3
4 hours ago
dont tell me its football, i hope it isnt

@What3
4 hours ago
and whats your secret shame?

@Dyingcockneys
boomer?

@Rixille
4 hours ago

@Ihtultu
The Senior writer I recall is “Ashley Cooper” who wants to “blacklist CIS white men”.

DOLO
4 hours ago
I switched out computer games for computer hacking.

The Ayatollah
4 hours ago
I’m live here as soon as this finishes:

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
computer games should be seen as a secret shame like porn

@lautrec
4 hours ago
aria of sorrow, its the only one I’ve played

@dsallen7
4 hours ago
Game Boy Advance had some really underrated titles.

@What3
4 hours ago

Crusader Kings 3 or bust.

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago

@Rixille
if so, let the game burn.

@Hitler_Respecter
4 hours ago
Strikers got it right

1
0

@Rixille
4 hours ago
I don’t buy games anymore, it’s always wokeslop anti-white jew shit.

6
0
Hide replies

@What3
1 hour ago
check out paradox games, specifically crusader kings three. being angry all the time on the internet is not good for you in the long run, people dont like to be around someone who is bitter, even if they agree with their views

Yogus!
4 hours ago

@Hitler_Respecter
VTMB and Deus Ex were great

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
I have no ideal what these words mean

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
London has fallen’s final boss is a crown flinging king charles…impossible without mods

@dsallen7
4 hours ago
Castlevania was hard, but Ninja Gaiden was way harder.

@What3
4 hours ago
has all the cultures of the world represented accurately, including africa lmao

@Rixille
4 hours ago

@Ihtultu
Didn’t they have a tranny developing that game who also hates whites?

@Hitler_Respecter
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
one of the best of all time vtmb

@What3
4 hours ago
all other games of the same type pale in comparison

@lautrec
4 hours ago
:nerd_face:

@What3
4 hours ago
crusader kings 3 or naught

14Reasons
4 hours ago
anyone play vampire the masquerade bloodlines ?

@Hitler_Respecter
4 hours ago
SOTN is best Castlevania

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago
mark needs to play the new Space Marine 2.

2
0

@What3
4 hours ago
thats why his vp is so young and has military background

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
whoever is counting the votes decides

@What3
4 hours ago
he will, and he will hand the baton to the guy he picked as vice president to kick off the war

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@What3
lol true. but the other side is very strong and very deranged too

@Hitler_Respecter
4 hours ago
I think he will win because he’s a pressure release valve. The U.S.A is becoming angry and racist again and only trump can cool that off and buy them more time to genocide us

3
0
14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Ihtultu
yes

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Only the dissident right can give him the victory

@What3
4 hours ago
so he will win

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
the dip and rise yes

@What3
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
jignat/right wing jews want him to win, and they’re ascendant

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
America is now in a point in which not even the Weimar solutions would not work. u would need some extreme.

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
400k votes delivered at 5am to swing states, its all rigged

14Reasons
4 hours ago
clown show ***

14Reasons
4 hours ago
the elections are all rigged like last time. why would he win ? its all rigged. who counts the votes . its a clown shoe

@What3
4 hours ago
it isnt, trump is going to win. watch it happen, been saying it since he lost 2020

@What3
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
then lobster is the same (it isnt)

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
ho ho ho don’t eat the shrimp ho ho ho ho

14Reasons
4 hours ago
bloody hell that’s what I thought numerous places don’t take out the crap sack….

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Carlota
agreed

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@What3
more or less the same

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
4 hours ago
$5.00
Beagle enthusiasts are gay

2
0

@What3
4 hours ago
then you’ll love crawfish

@MarkCollett

14Reasons
4 hours ago
oh now shrimps okay mark ? lol

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
Hello brother.

Stewart Passmore
4 hours ago

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
just waiting for starmers starzi to batter down my door

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Ihtultu
yo

14Reasons
4 hours ago
two party Jew party

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
Keep on march!

@What3
4 hours ago
yea, its tiresome

@MarkCollett

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago

@Rixille
I would not call it good. it simply reinclued stripped features. though the WRE hardest difficulty campaign was fantastic.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
you’ll be back

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago
total war died with rome 2

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
lol

14Reasons
4 hours ago
hahahahahha

@What3
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
remove the subsides for non whites, watch that policy enforce itself.

DOLO
4 hours ago
In SA it’s majority rights for blacks, but in England it’s minority rights.

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago

@What3
I hope it succeeds.

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago
a referendum will never help.

14Reasons
4 hours ago
the minimum should be 95% white in the UK . demanded. force. not asked

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
well said Striker

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
Well said Striker

@What3
4 hours ago
until it isnt

@SerenaJB

14Reasons
4 hours ago
the entire land is a homeland for whites. its all yours

1
0

@ilovepikeys
4 hours ago
already is M8

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
Orania is doing well.

6
0
14Reasons
4 hours ago
they won’t allow us anywhere. we’re at war

@What3
4 hours ago
always look at someone’s past

@What3
4 hours ago
sargon will stab us in the back if/when the dust settles. u just wait

3
0
14Reasons
4 hours ago
that terminology civil rights for whites is tainted by what civil rights was about. it was about white genocide

DOLO
4 hours ago
Sargollum

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
soygon lol what a trash heap

1
0

@Hitler_Respecter
4 hours ago
civ1 first appeared on PC. Mark is stuck in console land

1
0

@Rixille
4 hours ago

@Ihtultu
Attila was actually really good, but the Creative Assembly is now a faggot woke company.

@What3
4 hours ago

@SerenaJB
success is south Africa being governed by afrikkaners again. short of that is just living in purgatory

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Anon
true

@teja
4 hours ago
Clocked in 1700h in “Unity of Command 2″…

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
im playing fall of London IRL and im losing

@Jake
4 hours ago
britannia was fun

@Anon
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
98%

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@What3
ya take everything from non whites

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
indeed

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
of course

@cheflad
4 hours ago
wasnt Renshaw in the young BNP?

@What3
4 hours ago
fbi op

@What3
4 hours ago
LOL

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
yeah

14Reasons
4 hours ago
didn’t they do some insane shit with atom waffen too

@What3
4 hours ago
whats ur guy’s take on scott ritter, i cant figure him out

@What3
4 hours ago
insane

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
I read that National Justice article

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
maybe I should ? hmmm…lol joking hahaha

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago

@14Reasons
never had it

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
4 hours ago
sick fkin animals

@What3
4 hours ago
what??

@What3
4 hours ago
they raped an informant?

Walther Mauser
4 hours ago
https://littoria.substack.com/

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
does it taste good ?

Yogus!
4 hours ago
This is why I push Christ.

@What3
4 hours ago
wtf?

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
intriguing

14Reasons
4 hours ago
reminds me of that fed satanic “white nationalist” cult. I forgot which it was. but it was so extreme and horrific

@What3
4 hours ago
….

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
… lol

14Reasons
4 hours ago
white nationalist cults are almost always feds. there is some horror storied I’ve heard. really horrific evil fed shit

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
there’s an energy drink called pussy

@What3
4 hours ago
they have a set o forign and local energy drinks, tried the local ones like red bull etc…they suck

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@What3
ok

@What3
4 hours ago
no, the drink shark

@TheThinRedLine

14Reasons
4 hours ago
striker is going for the Elvis look ? the side burns are hardcore lol

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@What3
I can smell them from yards away

@What3
4 hours ago
shark tastes like crap

14Reasons
4 hours ago
lmfao

@What3
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
yea i dont like them much

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
Amp is my favorite energy drink

DOLO
4 hours ago

@What3
Red Bull is in the room with me now.

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago
Send Mark the book so he can read the back cover.

Taciturn
4 hours ago
How about tea or coffee

@What3
4 hours ago
its ok, just tell me where the red bull butt u, its fine

@DOLO

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
I have never had energy drinks, they smell disgusting like very sugary bubblegum

@Niallmartellus
4 hours ago
lucas gage just uses third worldist takes to condemn Israel,,, completely oblivious (or perhaps not) to how those takes can be used against Whites…

DOLO
4 hours ago
I can’t stand this red bull simping. Total chemical trash product.

1
0
Yogus!
4 hours ago
Mark took one for the team

@What3
4 hours ago
LMAO

Taciturn
4 hours ago
Harsh but fair

@Thylacine
4 hours ago
You can make a new family mark

14Reasons
4 hours ago
lol

@Thylacine
4 hours ago
Leave her immediately

@What3
4 hours ago
smh

@What3
4 hours ago
mark collett fi like dem tropical red bull ting

14Reasons
4 hours ago
don’t start talking about niccotine. stopped years ago. worst craving on this entire planet

3
0

@What3
4 hours ago
hes a sperg, simple as

14Reasons
4 hours ago
cocaine striker ? jk

@What3
4 hours ago
hes tard wrangling christians

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@ChangusWhyteetoa
also octopusses are too intelligent to eat

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
Five legs is a no go

14Reasons
4 hours ago
I’ve heard he’s doing over the top crazy things from numerous people. something is going on there. don’t know what

@What3
4 hours ago
he went too hard trying to lure and keep his christian base and they kicked him off

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@ChangusWhyteetoa
I had it at restaurants, still rubber

@What3
4 hours ago
this

@14Reasons
lol

14Reasons
4 hours ago
wtf

14Reasons
4 hours ago
from what I’ve heard Lucas is going allegedly too extreme with his spergery ( and I love spergery )

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago

@Cathugger: Thank you for your contribution.

@What3
4 hours ago
lol lucas sperged out

Yogus!
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
indeed. Unless I can’t cook it right

14Reasons
4 hours ago

@DOLO
and squid I presume but they both taste wonderful…and smell horrible. I smelled up a whole hall way with my octopus in summer school when I was a teen. fun stuff

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@ChangusWhyteetoa
it is like rubber

@What3
4 hours ago
lobster, crab, fish, shark, crawfish, i dont eat any other seafood

Yogus!
4 hours ago
Eating octopus is like chewing bubble gum

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago
$5.00
Dear Mark, I have to ask Striker’s opinion on Donald Trump and does he think that he will be the next President of the USA?

@Cathugger
4 hours ago
$1.00
shrimp may be the cockroach of the ocean but it’s unbeatable with chilli lime and coconut. if cockroaches would taste like that you would see me hunting in the streets of New York at night.

DOLO
4 hours ago
It’s what the plants crave

@noreplacement
4 hours ago
We used to eat Brawn

DOLO
4 hours ago
Never eat Octopus. They’re too smart to be eaten.

@What3
4 hours ago
its like alex jones

@OBS
keeps rightoids from going full bore ending up in “whites firsts” circles

@dsallen7
4 hours ago
Lobster was once trash food, that was given to prisoners.

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
seaweed is a cheap food if you live near a beach

@Niallmartellus
4 hours ago
I always played TW Rome as Celts

0KT0BER
4 hours ago
lobster’s bloody delicious tho

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago

@SerenaJB
Exactly!

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
lobsters are big sea insects

ok3wire
4 hours ago
$5.00

@What3
4 hours ago

@ObscureTruth
she’ll keep them on her plantation lol. or they’ll move to another gatekeeper

@teja
4 hours ago
Bigot!

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
except oysters, oysters is patrician

@ToddUnctious
4 hours ago
Kosher food laws

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
shellfish is sea bugs

Commodvs Detritvs
4 hours ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Nobody can handle the Roman V I guess

DOLO
4 hours ago
Never eat anything with a face

@What3
4 hours ago
Except those sea insects tastes good

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
garlic mussels mmmmm

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
oy vey no shellfish

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
Crickets aren’t part of our culture.

Obscure Truth
4 hours ago

@What3
Yes, but others are just starting to learn about JQ from her. They will slowly come over to our side, I hope.

14Reasons
4 hours ago
no

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
hear hear

DOLO
4 hours ago

@What3
lol

@Jake
4 hours ago
the aryan urge to conquer europe

Yogus!
4 hours ago
I only play Melvors Idle because it does everything on autopilot

@What3
4 hours ago

@DOLO
ego issue

DOLO
4 hours ago
We have too many Generals and not enough soldiers.

@lautrec
4 hours ago
attila menu music is goated

Farseer.Visions
4 hours ago
play Civ III

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
My husband plays table top wargames.

@What3
4 hours ago
“hes just looking at a map”

)))Joker(((
4 hours ago
lol

@Rixille
4 hours ago
I don’t recall there ever being indians in Rome 2

@What3
4 hours ago
i had the same problem with stellaris

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
M C

Stan1
4 hours ago
repeat of history

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
because of starting area

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
jeet civ hjahaha

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
are hardest

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
indians

@Jake
4 hours ago
attila is really cool too

@What3
4 hours ago
anyone played manor lords?

@Rixille
4 hours ago
Who was the hardest to play in Rome? I can’t remember, maybe the Armenians on highest dif?

Stature of the Gods
4 hours ago
you need the mods with rome 2

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
all you need is heavy inf and shock cav

DOLO
4 hours ago
Sparta!

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
Age of empires 2 GOAT

Stan1
4 hours ago
no elephants wtf

@lautrec
4 hours ago
playing rome in rome total war is like making a human warrior in DnD

@What3
4 hours ago
LMAO

DOLO
4 hours ago
lmao

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
rome is the easiest

DOLO
4 hours ago
Playing as Rome in Rome total war is not bragging material lol

Yogus!
4 hours ago
Striker is gonna get some Japanese players who have been playing since they were in diapers

@What3
4 hours ago
yeh

@lautrec
4 hours ago
Civ?

@What3
4 hours ago
i think striker will lose

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
LOL

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
4 hours ago

@FeminineRevival
o/

FeminineRevival
4 hours ago

@NightNationReview
hi Nick o/

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@What3
true

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
4 hours ago
BRING BACK THE TOURNAMENT!

@What3
4 hours ago
first u have to have a tent

@TheThinRedLine

DOLO
4 hours ago
lmao

Tendie Research Room
4 hours ago
hahaha

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
4 hours ago
lol

Yogus!
4 hours ago
Ok, Striker, that wasn;t cool bro

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
but I agree with Mark about big tent

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Striker is one of the best

@What3
4 hours ago
he hates keith woods lol

@What3
4 hours ago
lol keith woods

@What3
4 hours ago
man, the religion shot is the most obvious yet its the most adhere to. boggles my mind

@Six

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
I agree with Mark here

@Six
4 hours ago
except that debate is needed since religion countersignals the idea of race

@What3
4 hours ago

@ObscureTruth
nah, she and her ilk are hindrances, speedbumps to the destination that is where we are at already

Commodvs Detritvs
4 hours ago
We love Striker

Obscure Truth
4 hours ago
Candace cannot possibly harm us because we know who and what she is, she cannot deceive us. We do not support her in anything except JQ. So we are definitely on the winning side.

Yogus!
4 hours ago
Stop picking on Striker!!

Commodvs Detritvs
4 hours ago
Month and a half

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein: Thank you for your kind donation.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Z

@What3
4 hours ago
telegram is compromised now if it isnt already

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
so true , his problems are numerous and solutions are few

Commodvs Detritvs
4 hours ago
How long did that bitch last? Liz Truss?

@What3
4 hours ago
its just elitists squabbles

@What3
4 hours ago

@DOLO
yea thats why i dont care about government, only to the extent i can mitigate their effect/screw up their shots

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
4 hours ago
$5.00
If the Uk government are going to continue working with “community leaders” from minority groups every time there is trouble will they eventually have to accept that we also need representation?

Stan1
4 hours ago
He’s been released pending court appearance

DOLO
4 hours ago
Half the worlds elites are former young global leader at this point

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
Also, gas and electricity prices are going up at much the same time. That could destroy Starmer.

AngryGoyJ
4 hours ago
its the honky tonk man

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
theres alot of tory chum in the waters of GB news

@What3
4 hours ago
so he was undercover for the other side and not zog?

@Yagoda

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
DUKE is the most bona fide Loyalist ever.

@ToxicPositivity
4 hours ago
if they’re really breaking away from the system, they’d be dead

@What3
4 hours ago
they dont know thats what they’re doing sometimes…but its what they’re doing

@What3
4 hours ago
low impulse control lmao

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@BritishGammon
he is on Frodi’s show

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago

@BritishGammon
I was thinking the same thing.

@What3
4 hours ago
holy shit

@What3
4 hours ago
FINALLY

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
Off topic but anyone know where Reed Johnson went to?

@What3
4 hours ago
YES

@What3
4 hours ago
THANK U

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
anyone who shills Andrew tates (owens, carlson) are not to be trusted

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
yes but also further , the economy won’t improve

@What3
4 hours ago
and they get ramped off

@What3
4 hours ago
what did i keep saying??

@What3
4 hours ago
thank u!!!!!

@What3
4 hours ago
EXACTLY

@ToxicPositivity
4 hours ago
theo von had bernie sanders and Trump a week apart, he’s tied with them

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
David Duke has been undercover for 50 years but he is finally breaking the case

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago

@BritishGammon
and

@TheThinRedLine
Let’s see what happens after the October budget. That will be interesting.

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
Cucker Tarlson is a malicious Coward.

@What3
4 hours ago
yea, they’re preventing people from reaching people like mark and striker etc

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
Imagine david duke reaching Theo Von’s audience.. We can only wish.

@What3
4 hours ago
david duke is kinda feddy tho but thats just me

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
next pm probably a Dei candidate

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago
$5.00
Hi Mark. Great show, good to see Striker back on with you. What do you think about Labour’s new plans to promote the eating of insects, especially crickets? Sounds disgusting to me.

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
owens husband is shifty

@What3
4 hours ago
striker again

@What3
4 hours ago
BOOM

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@BritishGammon
very possible , he is already unpopular

@What3
4 hours ago
get them to play along, i hear u mark

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
I think Starmer will be out before the next election, one way or the other.

1
0

@SammichLubber
4 hours ago
Imagine a democracy where no one shows up to the ballot box.

@cheflad
4 hours ago
Priti Patel ,who when a backbencher went for talks with the israeli secret service without permission, that would usually bar you from political office, but surprise surprise she ended up as home secretary years later

@Niallmartellus
4 hours ago
Conservatards will simp out for a black conservative, who is only like 25% as conservative as them, much harder than they will for a White that is more at their level…

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago

@What3
true, burning in the melting pot

@What3
4 hours ago
i dont care about the squabbles of elites

DOLO
4 hours ago
Sunak looked like a pajeet mr potatoe head

@What3
4 hours ago
the only people cooked are the ones governed by the british government whoever it is

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
tories are cooked

@What3
4 hours ago
yea, gotta keep ur kids on the winning team

Yogus!
4 hours ago
Striker makes me laugh and laughter is the best medicine

@What3
4 hours ago
hahahaha

@What3
4 hours ago
u mean like candace ownes? xD

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
:fedpost: those migrants lol

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
They get some protection by not being White

@Niallmartellus
4 hours ago
Conservatards simp for brown “conservatives”

@Niallmartellus
4 hours ago
Torys trying to be the Diverse moderates between Labour and Reform now

DOLO
4 hours ago
Tories need at least one more Indian female to stand a chance at getting elected.

@What3
4 hours ago
he is

@mylevels
hes a militant zealot sperg for globohomo

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
o/

@cheflad
4 hours ago
isnt Starmers personal rating now -16

Archipelago Woes
4 hours ago
Lets go Strike! o.

@SammichLubber
4 hours ago
*Keir

Dyingcockneys
4 hours ago
resurrect corbyn!

My Portal 2 chambers
4 hours ago
Starmer seems like a true believer in leftist ideology.

@What3
4 hours ago
Six Point Starmer

@SammichLubber
4 hours ago
Two Tier Steir

@noreplacement
4 hours ago
Starmer has gone berserk

@What3
4 hours ago
not rly, its just social proof

@Charles
they dont rly want the guy, they want to be around him. its a halo. Same way everyone wants to take pictures with a lambo or aston martin but they dont and/or cant own/maintain one

Commodvs Detritvs
4 hours ago
The Daily Starmer

@SammichLubber
4 hours ago
Make mutton chops great again!

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago

@GoyBoy1488
Thank you for your generosity.

Yogus!
5 hours ago
Contact the Sam Hyde network for a show, would watch

My Portal 2 chambers
5 hours ago
Perfect Strangers reboot

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@ChangusWhyteetoa
true

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
single men stink to single women, weird

Yogus!
5 hours ago
striker’s woman keeps a good house

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
This stream has taken an unexpected turn

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago

View post on imgur.com

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
true

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
I’d consider it an honor to be banned from the land of my ancestors by the current traitors and tyrants.

@What3
5 hours ago
someone get mark a drink stat

@What3
5 hours ago
yea

Yogus!
5 hours ago
The royal family has been getting bred by Rothschilds since the 1800s look it up

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
The Odd Couple?

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
$5.00

View post on imgur.com

14Reasons
5 hours ago

@Charles
something like that

Reclaim
5 hours ago
its all about that brooklyn-water, does wonders for a man’s constitution

Yogus!
5 hours ago
That haircut is mogging mark

@GoyBoy1488
5 hours ago
$14.88
Mark, how do u get along with everyone? Striker, how do you get along with almost no one?

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Women see a guy with a girlfriend as attractive because he must have something going for him

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
I feel sorry for younger folk. Everything is on camera now. Years ago, what went on was always in the past.

DOLO
5 hours ago
lol

14Reasons
5 hours ago
lol

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
I’m hammered right now

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
oh geez lol

14Reasons
5 hours ago
lol

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
a Whisky stream

14Reasons
5 hours ago

@Charles
lol. yea drink lots of water. its too much

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@jezz
Thank you for your kind donation.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago

@14Reasons
I drank an entire bottle of red wine today so I’m misfiring

@What3
5 hours ago
YES

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
Tourettes Mark

@What3
5 hours ago
lmao

@What3
5 hours ago
he turns into a spreg

14Reasons
5 hours ago

@Charles
what are you taking about

@What3
5 hours ago
someone get mark a drink please

@CrankyCracker2
5 hours ago

@noreplacement
lmao :laughing:

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago

@14Reasons
Red Wine?

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
Somebody post picture of that sign with the dog riding a skateboard smoking a ciggy and having a Martini

@noreplacement
5 hours ago

@CrankyCracker2
Yeah, me too. I keep it under control now. I lost too many times ha ha

@AlanBalogh
5 hours ago
Striker’s telling the truth.

DOLO
5 hours ago
Iron Liver

14Reasons
5 hours ago

@Charles
what

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
just drink lots of water and salt

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago

@14Reasons
Its kind of a woman drink?

jez9999
5 hours ago
$5.00
What do you think about the fact that Pavel Durov was chosen by Klaus Schwab’s WEF Young Global Leaders to join their organization, representing Finland?

@What3
5 hours ago
takes forever to get it out of ur body

DOLO
5 hours ago
Can relate

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
The older you get, the worse the hangover. It gets to the point when it’s not worth it.

@CrankyCracker2
5 hours ago
im an aggressive drunk its what made me quit years ago

DOLO
5 hours ago
lmao

@What3
5 hours ago
metabolism slows

@What3
5 hours ago
yea it catches up

14Reasons
5 hours ago

@Charles
wrong gaba agonism. makes you relaxed enough to be blatant

Yogus!
5 hours ago
lot of wet shoulders at the bar

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
Hail the strong Aussies

Bianca Fights The Zombies
5 hours ago
need to have a drinking stream

14Reasons
5 hours ago
I’ve never had a hang over in my life

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Alcohol isn’t telling the truth because it’s a clouded state of judgement

@What3
5 hours ago
likewise

@cheflad
5 hours ago
i like a nice botlle of isle of Jura Whiskey.

@What3
5 hours ago
SOMEONE GET COLLETTE A DRINK!!!!!

DOLO
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
Indeed.

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
ginnan tonnix

@What3
5 hours ago
bordeaux wine is nice

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
they are good

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Red Wine

@alpha007org
5 hours ago
true. Gin is a good alcohol drink.

@What3
5 hours ago
HAHAHAHA

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
gin keeps you thin, whiskey makes me frisky

Stan1
5 hours ago
Haven’t drank a drop in 3 months

@BMC1488
5 hours ago
Redbull and McDonalds

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@DOLO
Rum is good value for money

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
Yeah and I flllow Cottrell ans Sewell and Joell.

14Reasons
5 hours ago
I’d like a nice rum and coke now

@What3
5 hours ago
i like rum

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
Forget Scotch. English whisky is much smoother

DOLO
5 hours ago
Gin and Tonic is a womens drink

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
Mark only drinks redbull

DOLO
5 hours ago
I like Rum

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
Friendship ended with Mark Collet

@What3
5 hours ago

@DoubleOhSieben
hahaha

@vengeance
5 hours ago
lieutennant dan you aint got no legs

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
The Aussie nationalists are doing it too.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
10/10 name

DOLO
5 hours ago
Based

Teutonic Truth
5 hours ago
Communications outlets don’t merit more than a single syllable designation. X Post Reposted X

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago
Thank you once more

@DerCherusker

@What3
5 hours ago
what leverage do they have tho

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
Striker runs Suriname

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
I can put my real name and photo out because I’m a little guy

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
I saw that too , good optics

DOLO
5 hours ago
Striker is huge in Azerbaijan.

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
bourbon > scoth

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
yes I have seen that as well, very cool

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
They see him as a biker bar guy

Teutonic Truth
5 hours ago
CommonSense Nationalism will Prevail Go Free with CommonSense!

DerCherusker
5 hours ago
If anyone wants to take a listen:

@BMC1488
5 hours ago
Whiskey and cigarette smoking mess lol

@vengeance
5 hours ago
^

14Reasons
5 hours ago
they also claim coke addict

Reclaim
5 hours ago
Striker is a distinguished man

@vengeance
5 hours ago
I heard israel makes the best scotch (jk(

Yogus!
5 hours ago
Striker is big in Japan

DerCherusker
5 hours ago
$5.00
Mark and Striker, have you heard the new song “Opa war Sturmsylter” by FLAK? It’s a song about events on Sylt(Germany) from this year.

@vengeance
5 hours ago
isolate that drop

14Reasons
5 hours ago
you’re both with significant influence

@What3
5 hours ago
it is what it is

@What3
5 hours ago
yea he is, figuratively and literally

DOLO
5 hours ago
lol

14Reasons
5 hours ago
you arent a little guy striker

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
what else will i spend these bullshir tokens on?

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
so true

@What3
5 hours ago
exactly thats the only people they heard of because thats the way its set up, they’re there to prevent normies from getting to striker and mark

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@Dyingcockneys
Thank you for your contribution.

Reclaim
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Nice! I’m a fan of Striker, but I just thought it was a funny comparison :grinning:

Teutonic Truth
5 hours ago
X Post Reposted X

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
Organized Jewry greatly fears the truth

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
and that is why they will loose they are out of goodwill

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
5
real suppression is becoming a minority in your own home and being arrested for complaining about it

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago
I agree

@BritishGammon
Nothing like a bit of a friendly debate, after all.

@What3
5 hours ago
putin never comes out and says “ayo its israel that has to pay for this” its always (((the west))) its always USA, its always the attack dog and not the owner to blame

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@ReclaimYourNeighborhood
I had to google Jimmy Neutron. I’m glad I did.

@What3
5 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
nail on the head

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
Striker is looming

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
The UK economy relies on the real estate boom and equity based debt. There is no significant industry or job creation (jobs that provide a family man with a genuine economic stake)

DOLO
5 hours ago
np

@What3
5 hours ago
people say race war race war. when all u have to do is pull the plug on subsidies for immigrants and wait for winter lmao

Tendie Research Room
5 hours ago
ty

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
It’s not our fault their countries are hopeless slums

DOLO
5 hours ago
Vassal state: How America runs Britain, i think

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@What3
Exactly

Tendie Research Room
5 hours ago
what was the title of the book again?

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
all liberty defending man have been slaughtered or cucked, we are ripe for the soros picking

@What3
5 hours ago
winter comes, the government keeps u warm

@BritishGammon

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
James Joyce

@What3
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
why go home when your existence is subsidized?

DOLO
5 hours ago
From the book vassal state

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Time to go home but they’re no good at taking the hint

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@JohnMightBeGay
Thank you for your donation.

@What3
5 hours ago
remove welfare, the immigrants will either leave or starve. especially when winter comes around. but that requires taking power

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
right , party is over go home

@cheflad
5 hours ago
Striker really knows his stuff about England.

Teutonic Truth
5 hours ago
PatrioticAlternative.org .uk

@What3
5 hours ago
hes doing things in russian interest even if it means enabling the handlers of the west ie israel/jews

DOLO
5 hours ago

@dsallen7
True, signal is better.

@dsallen7
5 hours ago
Also Telegram is NOT end-to-end encrypted, despite them advertising it as being so.

@What3
5 hours ago
putin is the other side of the op

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I like to see a bit of disagreement on PWR

@Anon
5 hours ago
UK is more like 60% White British certainly not 74%

Reclaim
5 hours ago
Jimmy Neutron is all grown up now

DOLO
5 hours ago
Our insane leaders will probably ask for the Ukraine win for Durov lol

@Spectromancer
5 hours ago
Putin is no genius just our “leaders” make him look like one.

@Toosoon
5 hours ago
they don’t care

@Spectromancer
5 hours ago
Maybe firebombing and starving germans was not a great idea.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Their countries suck so bad they will arrive there no matter what

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@What3
there are state elections in the east and AFD myight win the “governor” posts inthe easts at least in Sachsen and Thuringia

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
Yo, Chedda Man was a blue gummed boot lipped n r, it’s science and sheeit

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
going to Turkey to get my notting hill shank dislodged, still waiting in A and E

Reclaim
5 hours ago
we wuz chedda-man

@What3
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
ah i see, i take back my previous comment then, if they own the factories/labour

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
They cant claim stolen land in Great Britain so tell them to piss
off

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
A storm is coming

@What3
5 hours ago

@Spectromancer
no, because all of them did not do this in prison. the ones with the sagged pants were some other guy’s bych

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@What3
I am not sure but I think Leipzig and Dresden are quite large industrial centers

@Spectromancer
5 hours ago
cuz they can’t have belts in prison.

@Apollo
5 hours ago

@What3
why am I not surprised

@chris
5 hours ago
saggy pants was a CIA prison psyop, that stuck.

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
Hugo boss suits for all

@What3
5 hours ago
the protest isnt going to amount to anything much if they dont have leverage

@TheThinRedLine
thats why i ask

Reclaim
5 hours ago
sagging pants is a custom they learn in prison

@What3
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
and what do they do/make? their economy

@What3
5 hours ago
that pants thing is a homosexual thing btw, originated in prisons

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
that originated in prison rapes by the way

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@What3
they are more white than the west

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
My pleasure

@Spectromancer
5 hours ago
That type of antiwhite violence is pretty much normalized in the US.

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@DerCherusker
Thank you again for your donation.

@What3
5 hours ago
afro caribs stabbed a white man who almost died while taking his baby for a stroll. its insane in uk

@Spectromancer
5 hours ago
Boomers gunna get reked

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
Alice Weidel (AFD) said yesterday at a rally that she want’s a survey in to who destroyed the Nordstream two

@chris
5 hours ago
Only figthing age matters.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Let’s face it: Starmer would be happy if White pensioners froze to death

@What3
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
whats their demographics and what do they mostly make/do?

@cheflad
5 hours ago
Striker just Nailed-it

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Thank you for your generous donation, Sir.

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
New Yorkers distrust people with suntans

@What3
5 hours ago

@DerCherusker
exactly

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@What3
a lot of protests in eastern Germany

@chris
5 hours ago
only flames are going to remove the jews in dissarmed countries.

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
of course I’m glad to be here

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
Mark’s looking sharp as nail, where do you tan, i have a tanning bed at home, you should look into it

DerCherusker
5 hours ago
$5.00
Good takes. Some of these “mainstream people” are using our talking points for their own purpose and may even water down the message.

@What3
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
is that so? how so?

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
I have a better question, why does the Royal Navy have Daleks on top of their ships?

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
$25.00
People I know who watch a lot of MSM are saying that Starmer is coming across as incompetent and out of his depth.
When he was heckled in Southport he certainly looked like a rabbit caught in headlights.
Do you think he’ll still be PM by the next election?

@What3
5 hours ago
for israel yes

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
In germany things are slowly heating up

@vengeance
5 hours ago
they should scrap the government headquarters for firewood

@chris
5 hours ago
Oj could run wakanda, but he’s dead now.

@vengeance
5 hours ago
Smash that :fire: button family, wfp

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
poorly informed u say, u literally said u started listening to her 3 weeks ago. u dont know the shot and thats fine. just stop trying to cope or have one over me when youre clearly new to this because you’re starting to annoy me

Dyingcockneys
5 hours ago
Johnny Bravo has really let himself go….so sad

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago

@chris
Ha good point

Yogus!
5 hours ago

@chris

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
sad

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
lol

@chris
5 hours ago
OJ is a slightly honorary Aryan, he killed a jew and a mudshark.

ViceVersaVice
5 hours ago
Mark is still a little naive. Begin with dont trust. guilty till proven otherwise

@What3
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
im saying its irrelevant if she has european genes or not. if shes not doing or saying things which help whites in the long and short term, shes a hindrance

@RoryHerbert
5 hours ago

@FeminineRevival
Thank you for your generous donation.

the woodlander
5 hours ago
i often need an interpreter to understand the doctors

Taciturn
5 hours ago
No elite who allows their kids to marry jews can be trusted

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago

@What3
So it’s the one drop rule and we cannot have any honoraries or allies?

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
5 hours ago

@chris
He likes sucking them off

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
I remember candace on ethan ralphs killstream back in the day

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
$25.00
Thank you for a nice afternoon show o/

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
ok carlota, ok. whatever.

ViceVersaVice
5 hours ago
Her Twitter space was ridiculous. Tate, scumbag blow hard talking over everyone

Taciturn
5 hours ago

@What3
White people have to stop letting their kids marry jews

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
25–30% about

@chris
5 hours ago
Trump is a jew.

@What3
5 hours ago
look how that went

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
Her boss was literally Ben Shapiro… she knows who the jews are

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
We’re dragging them forward and when they begin to adopt our views
at leatr somewhat that’s not always the end of the world.

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
use her and throw her away i say

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
We shall see

Yogus!
5 hours ago

@chris
watch some Dustin Nemos videos before you have a knee jerk reaction. I was you 2 months ago

@What3
5 hours ago
shes there to PREVENT people from finding U

@chris
5 hours ago
we don’t need a book edited by jews. We are RACE ONLY.

@What3
5 hours ago
shes not reeducating anyone

@MarkCollett
she and her ilk are GATEKEEPING against people like u and striker

Yogus!
5 hours ago
We need God on our side. Christian Identity will do that for us

@What3
5 hours ago
no one is saying she has to be 100% on our points. thats not the point, the point is she is inorganic and part of an op

@chris
5 hours ago
Candace is paid by the jews, always was.

@What3
5 hours ago
stop trying to strawman/redirect because ur point was invalidated

De Dubius Unum
5 hours ago
i got into it with a person recently from the U..K. he said that mas immigration wasn’t a big deal in the U.K. ? he was obliviously a Globalist shill

@What3
5 hours ago

@daxxx666
no one is crying, people are WARNING

Reclaim
5 hours ago
yes, but does she wash her chicken with dish soap?

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
Owens doesn’t need a pay check; she married into significant wealth

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
its to no oees benifet to cry about it

@What3
5 hours ago
sperg power

@What3
5 hours ago
striker the sperg gets it 1000%

DOLO
5 hours ago
Agree with Striker.

@What3
5 hours ago
finally

@chris
5 hours ago
Trump and race are the only gates left to keep.

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
Exactly right haha

@What3
5 hours ago
and now shes on the outside looking in so shes going with the wind

@What3
5 hours ago
she was ALLOWED to build

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
I wouldnt be surprised if shes still getting a paycheck from the daily wire

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
So she wasnt naturally a deep thinker. Rather superficially rose to the top

@What3
5 hours ago
striker dropping the shots, finally

@Rixille
5 hours ago
Candace was working for or at least acting for some surveillance tier org, but I can’t remember its name

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
seems like a very jewy plan

@What3
5 hours ago
trump is 100% white

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
I think the system is nervous

@What3
5 hours ago
irrelevant, shes an op

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
Owens looks like she has a good bit of White dna.

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
thats the emj take of religiuon over race bullshit

@chris
5 hours ago
Ive seen Dustin’s videos. still RACE ONLY, screw religion until we clean it up and remove the jew edits, thats what got us here.

@What3
5 hours ago
past matters

De Dubius Unum
5 hours ago
He walked away from me with his white family , I did mention Mark and others who are from the U.K. and are feed up, but I realize you have speech laws thoughwhich is insane

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
no u havent, u just found out today she was hired by jews off explore talent

@What3
5 hours ago
look how many years alex jonesers were in his camp before very few of them came to our thing

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
That sounds very sus

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
no offence but u just got here, 3 weeks u listened to owen for

@vengeance
5 hours ago
such theatre much fake wow

@tuer
5 hours ago
her first gig was crowdfunding for a online pillory for young girls social media sins

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Thats a bit shocking

De Dubius Unum
5 hours ago
We are fighting the powersthatbe out of jew control our message is more popular

@Carlota
5 hours ago

@What3
I remember Candace was unwatchable and a bad person in the past. Her transformation came only with her ultra-based ultra-Catholic husband.

@What3
5 hours ago
thats where she was pulled from

@daxxx666
5 hours ago
so the blueprint is work for the jews build your rep turn on the jews

@Rixille
5 hours ago
What was that “big brother” group she worked for?

DOLO
5 hours ago
Loomer

@What3
5 hours ago
https://www.exploretalent.com/candaceowens1

@Rixille
5 hours ago
Yeah she was

DOLO
5 hours ago
She didn’t build anything lol

@What3
5 hours ago
THANK U STRIKER

14Reasons
5 hours ago
you were never a small name. you always had lots of popularity mark. at least since I started seeing you

Obscure Truth
5 hours ago
As long as it benefits us, it’s good.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Well she’s a black female so her popularity will come to her far easier

@What3
5 hours ago
she was ALLOWED to build it

@MarkCollett

@alpha007org
5 hours ago
I remember HeelTurn outro Music. That pilot who went flying a little, with no experience, only XboX … good times

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
2016 the Golden year

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
Everyone I speak to says Listen to Mark and Striker. I only speak to three people though!

DerCherusker
5 hours ago
I remember heelturn show.

Yogus!
5 hours ago
Those were the days. Bloodsports too

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
go checker her in 2020

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
5 hours ago
$5.00
Great Stream guys. If people want a great education in geo politics past, present and future check out Striker’s work, he has great taste and knowledge of Scotch also

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
yeah really

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago

@commodvsdetritvs
Walsh also shits on the GOP for pandering to leftist freaks too. I’ll take that and when he says something tarded I’ll call it out too.

@Carlota
5 hours ago
Candace is very smart, not cultured, but very smart and articulate. She totally destroyed the rabbi and Piers Morgan in debates.

@SerenaJB
5 hours ago
I loved heelturn

14Reasons
5 hours ago
heelturn when spencer was good…..a lifetime ago

@What3
5 hours ago
jews recruited her from explore talent

14Reasons
5 hours ago
heelturn was great

@What3
5 hours ago
shes an op tho mark. just bad at playing her role now

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
In many ways Candace is a DEI in the right wing sphere

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
I put you guys on a pedestal

Yogus!
5 hours ago
All that matters if you get the Eye of Sauron on you

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
As long as it actually does without giving the enemy any ammo to use against us

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Candace appealed to normie much faster as the based black lady which was very trendy at the time

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
I strongly suspect Sargon & his media operation are Jewish funded, just like the rest of he British establishment-right. They never call out the evil that’s being carried out in Palestine or the extent of Zionist influence

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
Bilzerian is a trust fund baby chasing the latest trend much like the tates

@What3
5 hours ago
synthesise the shots. i think candace is an op but shes playing her role badly because of low impulse control

@tuer
5 hours ago
Vox Day had as reply to Ron Unz article on Candace to say that her mix of wealth and black shield may simply be too much of a hassle for Youtube

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago

@commodvsdetritvs
It works in our favor, period. That’s why.

@What3
5 hours ago
lmao

@What3
5 hours ago
fair enough mark

@kadir
5 hours ago

@ReclaimYourNeighborhood
bingo

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
i rest my case lol

@kadir
5 hours ago
HOT TAKE :fire:

@What3
5 hours ago
right right, collet has a point

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago

@SammichLubber
Because who is giving us those Ws and what’s their motivation?

DOLO
5 hours ago
You’re probably giving them too much credit.

@Sneeder
5 hours ago
lol

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
She has black privilege so it helps her

@Apollo
5 hours ago
lol

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
Jews know that the goy waking up is inevitable, and just like a good magician they’ll control which direction that goes.

Reclaim
5 hours ago
Candace lacks a frontal lobe

@What3
5 hours ago
hahahahahhahaha

@What3
5 hours ago
LMAO

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
They would get cancelled into oblivion if they told the truth on everything

@SammichLubber
5 hours ago
I got shit on the other day for saying Matt Walsh is saying ‘anti-White’ and releasing a documentary on anti-White racism because he isn’t one of /ourguys/. Why can’t we take the little Ws when we get them w/o attacking each other?

DOLO
5 hours ago
We need a mentally ill billionaire to talk about how based AH was to win.

@What3
5 hours ago
sit down, have my coke in hand

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
I tend to be more on Striker’s side of this issue

)))Joker(((
5 hours ago
Striker has a point

@What3
5 hours ago
ima sit down for this one

Reclaim
5 hours ago
I bet Candace eats spoonfuls of raw corn starch when no one is watching

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
indeed.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
She might know however she doesn’t want to get completely canclled

@What3
5 hours ago
finally

@What3
5 hours ago
EXACTLY striker

Yogus!
5 hours ago
The system will release more and more information as they consolidate more and more power

@What3
5 hours ago
no one is saying for her to be 100% on our side

@UltimateTruth
but look at her origin, her past. who took her in. she is an OP

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
the fact that her channel shows up in the yt reccomended section should raise alarm bells

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
We can take what we can get

@What3
5 hours ago
if its 2 years ago or less i rest my case

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago

@What3
yes they do it on purpose to waste everyone’s time.

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
when did u start?

@What3
5 hours ago
and u are a virgin

Vettekid1488
5 hours ago
striker is a freak show grifter

@What3
5 hours ago
she is there to take crap, tie it to legit points to make the whole thing look like crap

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
correct.

@What3
5 hours ago

@Carlota
sigh, and she talks about ufos and retarded crap also

Obscure Truth
5 hours ago
True

@Rixille
5 hours ago
Striker is right about that.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Snookie is now a washed up hag

Yogus!
5 hours ago
Snookie, havent heard that in 10 years

@What3
5 hours ago
excatly striker

Vettekid1488
5 hours ago
who the fuk is this freak Striker???? he looks like a horror movie character for God sake

Reclaim
5 hours ago
Jersey girls

@What3
5 hours ago

@MarkCollett
no collette, shes there to tie cook shit to legit conspiracies then sink it

DOLO
5 hours ago
Snookie effect lol

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
She’s aware of the clear hypocrisy however she isn’t going into the Zionist dominance in the West

Yogus!
5 hours ago
You could redpill millions of Christians with Dustin Nemos with Christian Identity. Something to consider

Obscure Truth
5 hours ago
Indeed. Yeah, let her talk.

@What3
5 hours ago
jews pulled her and bobert and others off of explore talent

@What3
5 hours ago
did u see the link i sent? lol

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
Owens has a huge reach

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
Candace isn’t extremely knowledgeable on it but we appreciate her scraping the surface in the mainstream

@What3
5 hours ago
doesnt matter

@Carlota
look at her origin. she is there to tie cook shit to legit conspiracies to sink it

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
the groypers are already turning on her lol

DOLO
5 hours ago
Maybe the new version of 80/20 is not to lie about the other 20%, but to talk about ancient aliens instead.

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
Not sure she’s not an op

@What3
5 hours ago
https://www.exploretalent.com/candaceowens1

@UltimateTruth
they took it down but she was on explore talent

Stan1
5 hours ago
It’s genocide

Stan1
5 hours ago
It’s not a war

Yogus!
5 hours ago
88

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
I’m undecided. She’ll say something 100% truthful and then in the next breath say something idiotic

Walther Mauser
5 hours ago
https://littoria.substack.com/

@Rixille
5 hours ago
There is truth to that for sure

@What3
5 hours ago
yea she is, check her origin

@UltimateTruth
and its not the talmud striker its the torah

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I’ve had 2 twitter accounts suspended. If they ban me they must be very desperate.

Chuck Gerety
5 hours ago
USA gives Israel a license to murder

Subversion Diversion
5 hours ago
this is what Adam Green calls “kosher antisemitism”

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
Candace Owens is just slightly ignorant. I don’t believe she’s cynically acting as controlled opposition

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago
yes these people are fake and should be ignored.

@dsallen7
5 hours ago
Striker’s bitrate is dropping

Tendie Research Room
5 hours ago
they done goofed and deplatformed the dissidents and its costing them allot of resources to keep track of all these groups gone underwater. Their move is to attract dissidents back where they can monitor and analyze more effectively

Commodvs Detritvs
5 hours ago
:robot:

@vengeance
5 hours ago
o/ hail striker

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
XD

)))Joker(((
5 hours ago
candace ovens

Yogus!
5 hours ago
Elvis has entered the building

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
He got rid of Lucas Gage on trumped up charges. The Jews did not like Gage’s Twitter account; they pressured Musk to ban him

@What3
5 hours ago
ahhh makes sense

)))Joker(((
5 hours ago
njp

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
Musk is too largeand a household name

@ToxicPositivity
5 hours ago
Twitter has always been the right arm of the US govt. it was largely responsible for the Arab Spring in the early 2010’s

@UltimateTruth
5 hours ago
Long-term Twitter will greatly grow in value

ThinRedLine
5 hours ago
gay rapper

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
old jewry

@What3
6 hours ago
tied to labor

@What3
6 hours ago
TL;DR its not tied to labored

@What3
6 hours ago
i dont think its good, because cornered animals fight to the death with their all

@RoryHerbert
6 hours ago
Evening

@Chief_Moody

@What3
6 hours ago
they’re flailing, cornered animal tactic

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
financialized economy

Chief Moody
6 hours ago
Evening troops

Yogus!
6 hours ago
I suggest also another guest

@MarkCollett
, Dustin Nemos, has lots of proof that jews are not israelites. Christian Identity would be very powerful for Christians in the movement.

@RoryHerbert
6 hours ago

@DerCherusker
Thank you for your kind donation.

Horse Consoler
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
puff doodle

FeminineRevival
5 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
yes indeed

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
p diddle

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
$25.00
Great show, great guest

DOLO
6 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
His videos are great.

@What3
6 hours ago
flex on elon

@What3
6 hours ago
excatly

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
This Zionist occupied government does not work or strategically plan on behalf of the mass of the population. Self-interested puppets

@What3
6 hours ago
no they weren’t pressured. they want this because its good precedence for europe

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@DragonFox
just followed

@What3
6 hours ago
Hu

@What3
6 hours ago
or the guy prior

@What3
6 hours ago
when it was mao, oh boy

@What3
6 hours ago

@DOLO
depends on who is in charge, xi is in charge so u get a library if u give him a vector for his markets

DerCherusker
6 hours ago
$5.00
Mark and Striker, do you have any thoughts on the nationalist protest in Leipzig, which involved various individuals, all of whom were, of course, registered and stopped by the police?

@What3
6 hours ago
yea, hard power, they’re flailing like a cornered animal

DOLO
6 hours ago
If you deal with China they will build you a massive Library, if you deal with America they will troon your kids and bring in infinity migrants.

@What3
6 hours ago
communists and famine as a weapon go hand in hand

@What3
6 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
nope, they just had a bunch of jews in their ranks and one of them (lazar kaganovich) gave the green light for a famine, mugabe style

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
Genuine free speech is a real threat to the Zionist order and their power grip

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
at least the Soviet Union didn’t have mass migration and Lgbtq bullshit

@What3
6 hours ago
or he could of been lead into a honey trap

@MarkCollett

@Sneeder
6 hours ago
yeah but ultimately it wasn’t worth it if the west breaks him anyway

@What3
6 hours ago

@Sneeder
makes sense they’d do that because telegram is a threat to them too, theres enemies of them who organize on telegram, they press him, the west does the work for putin

Horse Consoler
6 hours ago

@commodvsdetritvs
BANG! blood dribbles down…

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
the west is a dystopian shithole

Commodvs Detritvs
6 hours ago
Dammit now I have “From Russia With Love” stuck in my head

@Sneeder
6 hours ago
Russia made a huge mistake pressing him in the first place, should’ve just be patient

@DragonFox
6 hours ago
I can’t sign up for goyim. I want to post videos there again. I have gone back and forward on ht several times myself

@What3
6 hours ago
lol ok, keep coping

Yogus!
6 hours ago
Seen all that, inconclusive

@What3
6 hours ago
i can link the proof here but id get banned

@What3
6 hours ago
yeap

Yogus!
6 hours ago
No

@What3
6 hours ago
handsome truth is gay and stupid, literally

Yogus!
6 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Get Handsome Truth on again?

@DragonFox
6 hours ago
I just made a Telegram channel, I’m still trying to understand it lol:
https://t.me/DragonFoxOdysee
Anyone want to be my first sub lol

@What3
6 hours ago
came to the west for poosie

@Sneeder
6 hours ago
precisely

@What3
6 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
thats how they got mordecai vanunu whistleblower

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@DOLO
lmao

DOLO
6 hours ago
I didn’t thinks so, but i have standards lmao

Chuck Gerety
6 hours ago
Grindr is a hotbed for child preds

DOLO
6 hours ago
She wasn’t even that attractive.

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
she was hot

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@What3
exactly

DOLO
6 hours ago
Did you see the bird that got him? lol

@What3
6 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
probably was honeypotted lol. cant imagine not being savvy about not knowing you have a target on ur back

@cheflad
6 hours ago
striker looks like a young Boz Boorer ,guitarist with Morrisseys backing band.

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
Warstrike is a superb show, very high quality

DOLO
6 hours ago
WarStrike is excellent.

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
Durov was stupid to come to the west

@What3
6 hours ago

@0KT0BER
yea, he’ll play ball now or go behind bars. telegram is compromised now if it wasnt already

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
Striker is a great thinker and journalist/ researcher and recommend his and Warren’s show Warstrike

@cheflad
6 hours ago
Pavel Durov was apparently in talks to return to Russia

Reclaim
6 hours ago
reminds me of James Dean from ‘rebel without a cause’

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@What3
he refused to hand a backdoor to sec services so its claimed

DOLO
6 hours ago

@DragonFox
RIP lmao

@Sneeder
6 hours ago
shut it down

Chuck Gerety
6 hours ago
It’s cool how his sideburns know how to morph on demand

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
(((Online Safety Bill)))

@What3
6 hours ago
holy shit telegram owner arrested? :.

@RoryHerbert
6 hours ago
Evening

@WelshNationalistJoe
Sir.

@DragonFox
6 hours ago

@DOLO
Lol you’re right, maybe this aryan hair just makes me miss my dead black wife

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
Starmer is close to the Crown Prosecution Service; the Crown Prosecution Service is Zionist occupied

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@What3
yeah

Joe Marsh
6 hours ago
Hes the king of rock n roll

@What3
6 hours ago
yea

@What3
6 hours ago
the strike and mike talk?

@Darth_Joker
the only good thing on trs at the time?

DOLO
6 hours ago

@DragonFox
Go with a Fro to pay respects to your dead black wife lol

the woodlander
6 hours ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
nope he just took up smoking and being racist..its all good

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
even more important it is not good for him

DOLO
6 hours ago
I thought that was part of ‘the look’

@What3
6 hours ago
he wants to die sooner/go out early, doesnt wanna reach old age

@UltimateTruth

Joe Marsh
6 hours ago
Elvis aint dead

@UltimateTruth
6 hours ago
Striker needs to pack in the chain smoking. Not a good look

@What3
6 hours ago
u can sit through it if ur a sperg

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
6 hours ago

@DOLO
\o

DOLO
6 hours ago

@NightNationReview
o/

@JohnMightBeGay
6 hours ago
$5.00
throwing some shekels your way. Mark, i really hope you can become the next mosley that england so desperately needs. wishing you and PA nothing but the best. warm regards from the Jewnited states.

pa
6 hours ago
strikers hair is class , lay off him

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@What3
I was talking the episode long time ago

@cheflad
6 hours ago
ive already toned down my language on twitter ,half expected a knock on the door.

@DragonFox
6 hours ago
I like the guy on the right but I might try out a different hair style lol

@What3
6 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
no, they both got kicked to the curb because they were disrupting mike/jesse’s grift

DOLO
6 hours ago
Elvis is also in Argentina!

Reclaim
6 hours ago
pomade nationalism

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago
Strike and Mike had an episode or two with Warren was substituting for Moike, I think that’s how WarStrike got the name

Vettekid1488
6 hours ago
he’s a grifter

DOLO
6 hours ago
The pack of cigs in the folded up black t sleeve

@cheflad
6 hours ago
like the Morrissey quiff.

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
he’s our last and only hope

Chuck Gerety
6 hours ago
Jimmy Neutron

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@0KT0BER
He’s gonna rock this town, lol

DOLO
6 hours ago
Don’t mock the look lol

@Spectromancer
6 hours ago
Striker takes his time with the afrosheen prep.

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@SerenaJB
good evening

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
is Eric getting the Stray Cats back together?

@SerenaJB
6 hours ago
Good evening.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
I had hair like that…circa 1977

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@NightNationReview
o/

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
6 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
\o

@Spectromancer
6 hours ago
Keith Woods persistence on social media is a bit puzzling.

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@NightNationReview
o/

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
I can’t remember any songs past 1994

@Darth_Joker

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
6 hours ago
o/

@Charlie_Boy
6 hours ago
did he say 30 weeks?? only feels like the other day striker was on the show

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
Warstrike is great

@What3
6 hours ago
lol striker thinks keith woods is a fed xD

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago

@0KT0BER
that’s the only song I know of

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@Carlota
that’s crazy good that he got shot

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago
or coffee, not sure

The Resident Baker
6 hours ago
Evening all o/

DOLO
6 hours ago

@Carlota
Sorry to hear that. Hopefully things will change in Europe soon.

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago
tea and cigarettes?

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@Carlota
again today ?

DOLO
6 hours ago

@Carlota
A separate incident to the diversity festival stabbing?

Commodvs Detritvs
6 hours ago
How he can afford cigarettes in New York I’ll never know

@Algirdas
6 hours ago
Hey, Mark. Do you think it’s in bad taste for Eric to mock the suffering of Ukrainians in the war (

3:02:25) but expect us to feel solidarity with Palestinians?

the woodlander
6 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
mate

DOLO
6 hours ago

@FeminineRevival
o/

FeminineRevival
6 hours ago
hail chat people o/

Stature of the Gods
6 hours ago
o/

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago
here we go

the woodlander
6 hours ago
chat

Commodvs Detritvs
6 hours ago
o/

DerCherusker
6 hours ago
Hail!

DOLO
6 hours ago
o/

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
o/

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
Hello folks

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
good evening mate

DOLO
6 hours ago
Stryker is usually a few mins late. I think it’s his anti assassination tactic.

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
“Keith Woods: The World Bank is boycotting X over the account of @ barrystantonGBP after pressure from CBS News” lol

the woodlander
6 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
evening friend

@dsallen7
6 hours ago
Running on Striker time LOL.

ThinRedLine
6 hours ago
Good evening all

@RoryHerbert
6 hours ago
Good evening

@Woodlader.4
and chat.

@What3
6 hours ago
lol striker the sperg

@fellowenglishman
6 hours ago
o/

FeminineRevival
6 hours ago

@DOLO
o/

)))Joker(((
6 hours ago
o/

@dsallen7
7 hours ago
$15.00
I don’t think Telegram will be going anywhere. It’s too valuable a source of intel and tool of disinfo for various state actors. Instead, Durov will likely strike a deal to curtail its more illegal content (piracy, CSAM) while allowing CIA, Israeli, Ukrainian honeypots to continue.

Commodvs Detritvs
7 hours ago
Striker and k.d. lang apparently

@BMC1488
8 hours ago
o/

MagicManintheSky
14 hours ago
4am in Aussie!

Northern Blue
18 hours ago
8am show? Serious schedule change

0
0

==========================

See Also

top