Germar Rudolf: Thank you. I need to get my instruments ready here. Now they fall apart. There was a cap to it and somehow that fell off. I apologize for this. All right.

 

I have something positive to say about this country to just attach right to the speech you just heard. And that is the fact that we can do what we do right now in this country. Because in many countries where our ancestors came from, we would not be able to do this! So there’s freedom of speech and freedom of assembly in this country. So there’s something good to say.

 

Also, what I wanted to mention is when it comes to the war against Iran, the Iranians are an Indo-European people. The language is closer to English and German than it is to Arabic. And when we should talk about the victims that this war causes, we should talk about the thousands and thousands of people of Indo-Europeans of Iranian ancestry that are being murdered.

 

Now, my topic today, as you would probably guess, is on Holocaust, because that’s what I’m known for and that’s what I’m good at. Before I do it, I give a little bit of an introduction of who I am. I would assume most of you know, but probably not all.

 

I am a German citizen. I grew up, born in the mid-1960s, grew up in West Germany, had a normal lower middle class upbringing, went to a normal public school, eventually studied chemistry, graduated. And in the process of graduating, I stumbled over that topic, research that had been done here in the United States by an expert in execution technologies who was looking into the gas chamber question and had some chemical arguments which caught my attention. And as a chemist, I couldn’t look away down the rabbit hole I went and never came back.

 

Now, the persecution that has resulted from my activity, because Germany is not a country where free speech and freedom of science, freedom of assembly has led me ultimately to this country. And there’s another good thing. The government has tried hard to keep me out. They actually arrested me. I was married to a US citizen. I had a granted immigrant visa. They arrested and deported me anyhow, with the reason given “no criminal case”. So in violation of that, I ended up in Germany. And Germany, I was put on trial for the research that I had published over the past five years while in exile. And they sentenced me to 44 months in total. And I had to spend that time.

 

Now, I’m not a singular case and I’m not the worst case of what’s going on in Europe.

 

Anyway. I fought my way back. I won in court. What they’d done to me was wrong. It was remedied as much as you can remedy losing five years of your life in prison. Was reunited with my family and I got the status of a permanent legal resident now in this country.

 

So 35 years of research on that topic have a number of years ago raised the question to me, how do I get the message out to the masses? The first 30 years, I would say I was looking for answers myself. I wasn’t sure whether I understood everything and whether I really got this story straight.

 

And then at the end of the 30 year mark, I was pretty sure. And then the idea came up of how do I get the message out now? One way is of course writing something that makes the information accessible. A lot of you actually bought it today from me. So I wrote an encyclopedia because that’s what scholars do all the time.

 

Actually, no, they don’t!

 

But I was in the unique situation that I had this knowledge. 35 years of sitting at the helm at the core of this skeptical, scrutinizing research. And I decided it needs to be done. And in lack of support from others and due to a cataclysmic development in my private life, I had the time to do it and I pulled it off.

 

So we have the knowledge published, we have it concisely presented and made accessible. There is still a step of how do I get people to listen? Because we’re talking about a taboo topic and people don’t want to hear it.

 

You, most of you probably are open minded. Some of you are, almost many I don’t know are convinced already that the mainstream narrative is phony. But we want to reach those who sit on the fence or even on the other side of it. How do we do that? And I want to give you a little bit of a instruction by example of the best approach.

 

[05:23]

 

 

And the best approach you already have seen. Some of you coming by our book stand there seeing those signs here and marveling over these graphics and the information that’s on there.

 

The best approach for the normies into this topic is not talking about lies that they’ve made up like jewish soap. They all have admitted it didn’t happen or lampshades or what. No! What you want to talk to them about is massive violation of civil rights! It’s free speech, is freedom of assembly that doesn’t exist over there. And make them see in concrete examples what that means!

 

When we’re talking about this topic here, people need to realize, every person needs to realize that every historian on this planet to one degree or another, if he wants to write Holocaust historiography or talk about it or write about it, he is doing history at gunpoint.!

 

That’s the only topic in the world right now, more or less on a global scale, where historians are threatened with at least destruction of their career, if not outright prosecution and imprisonment.

 

 

Scholars, not just historians, scholars you can do physics, you can do psychology, you can do any science and you will not get in trouble if you say something that’s controversial. It’s only this one! This particular part in history that gets people in trouble! Even in this country we have free speech. But any historian who touches that is a third rail topic, he will find his career ended.

 

 

This is the map of Europe. You see in red the countries that have outlawed Holocaust skepticism, that have outlawed doubt! Doubt is the core feature of us human beings, that sets us apart from animals who cannot doubt their central input. We can doubt what we see. We can systematically look for the truth and communicate with our fellow humans what the truth is or what we think the truth is, and can even make it independent of ourselves by putting it down encoded so that everyone can see it. That is what sets us apart!

 

And a government that outlaws doubt, outlaws search for truth, outlaws communicating the truth with others, is outlawing humanity! These countries have outlawed humanity! Stalinist Russia, as bad as it was, had no laws that would proscribe the result of any scholarly research in any field by penal law. This is the first in mankind history that we have that the European Union forces members who have not yet passed laws in the European Union to do it or they are threatened with sanctions. Finland just passed earlier this year, the last one, because they said we’re threatened by the EU by some kind of sanctions or measures. And that’s why we introduced that law.

 

 

Now what does that mean? I’ve told you about my 44 months for the research. You can see that there are two books, Chemistry for Auschwitz, if you want to look at it. It’s my original forensic research and lectures on the Holocaust.

 

 

 

Having done what I’m doing right now here to academic audiences in Germany, talking about my research in the calm and academic style led to being sentenced. There were worse cases.

 

 

I want to focus here on Austria. Some of you have looked through a list of all the countries and some are not on this map. Actually, of course, Canada has introduced a law north of us and Australia uses a backdoor way of doing it. And Israel, of course, is the first country that has outlawed skepticism. And there are other countries who use other laws. They twist and tweak in order to send people to prison.

 

[09:23]

 

And in the Arabic world, unfortunately, we should think there should be an open mind there. A lot of governments in the Arabic world are bought by Europe and America and they prosecute dissidents on that topic with extra legal means. They are not democracies under the rule of law, whatever that means. Because in some aspects we are not anymore either. But for them it’s pure arbitrariness.

 

So this is a global thing, a global problem. We just had a censorship hit us, a company in China. We wanted to have merchandise produced with certain slogans on it on Holocaust skepticism. And they pulled a plug. Not even in China they want to do it anymore!

 

 

Austria, the worst case, 20 years! You can go up to 20 years in prison. If you combine it, the skepticism, quote, unquote, “denial” with statements that they interpret as re-engaging in National Socialist activities. If you were, for instance, to argue that the Austrians are just one tribe of the Germans and they should live together with other Germans in Germany, which was a normal thought up to 1945. In the 17th century, 18th century, 19th century, in the 20th century, as the people of Austria always felt. And they were for the longest time the core in the center of Germany. And they got kind of pushed out with Prussia taken over in the late 19th century. And then after the collapse of Prussian Germany and Austria, the Austrian Empire after the First World War, they said:

 

“Okay, we had it, now let’s get reunified.”

 

That was the idea of the Wilson 14 points for the truce to have everyone self-determination. And the Austrians got it denied. And after the war, Second World War, they had special laws enacted if you violate them, up to 20 years. Denial combined with demands for self-determination.

 

 

To put a face to it, Austrian engineer Wolfgang Fröhlich was arrested in the early 2000s for a paper he had written. He’s an expert for disinfestation technology and disinfestation gas chambers. So he knows the technique and compared it to what was said to have been going on in German extermination camp during the war. And said:

 

“That’s technical nonsense, it can’t be!”

 

And he got eventually indicted and put in prison. And he was upset about what they did to him. And he kept writing letters and arguments from within prison, got more and more indictments and got sentenced over and over again! At the end of the day, he spent 16 years in prison for his engineering arguments. And he came out just around Covid, caught Covid and died shortly afterwards.

 

Western politicians complain about Iran or China putting dissidents for four, five, seven years in prison. At the same time they put them for 16 years in prison! That’s the worst case.

 

 

This graph here shows you the initiation of criminal investigation for thought crimes in Germany. Since 1994 some 4, 500, up to the most recent data for, … The year 2025 comes out maybe next month. Getting a little bit of a feedback here. [humming sound] The blue one is Right-wing thought crimes. That’s what we are committing here right now! Okay? Then you have the Left-wing ones. These are usually Antifa communists who make some radical statements about blowing up Parliament or having a communist revolution. And then you have the green ones, foreign religious, that usually means Muslim, Muslim radicals who want to introduce Sharia law or something like that. So for these two cases you really have to make aggressive statements that are not peaceful anymore.

 

Whereas in these cases if you’re just against mass immigration, you say anything critical about the jews, any dissent on the Holocaust, or more recently anything critical about Israel’s policy in Gaza. This is the Gaza escalation that you see.

 

 

Germany has extended their law that they outlaw more and more both by case law and by actually written code. And now this past data we were up to 40,000, 35,000 of them. Stuff that people like we do, like what we argue and talk about. 35,000 initiated criminal investigations does not result in 35,000 people sitting in prison. I want to make that clear. Most people never get caught for the slogan they have sprayed on some wall or sticker they left somewhere. And if for first time offenders, usually it ends up with slap on the wrist. It may just be a summary offense with a fine that has to be paid. And for first time offenders it rarely ends with prison. But then you have the 1 or 2% of these cases that end up actually with prison cases.

 

[14:50]

 

Only minority of that is Holocaust skepticism. And I have no numbers, they don’t in their paperwork. This is data based actually on what the German government releases. And they are put proud of it! Because they call themselves a combative, defensive democracy! Okay?

 

So they defend themselves in combating anyone they consider to be an enemy. But they are actually the biggest enemy of democracy. I wouldn’t even call it democracy, but a state under the rule of law that respects human rights that they never get a mirror held against them to look into it because that’s the enemy that caused this kind of persecution.

 

Back to history. This kind of an atmosphere that you have in Europe, in most countries and even in this country where historians don’t go to prison, but immigrants like me, I’m currently constantly on an ejector seat and I can get thrown out any minute if the Trump government so decides, because they don’t respect the law either.

 

 

What effect does it have, actually concrete, on historians? Here you see the lovely face of Wacław Długoborski, Auschwitz survivor who was put in charge, as I say, the Billy goat that was put in charge of the garden. He was put in charge of the Auschwitz Museum’s historical research center. And for many decades he has been that boss. And under his auspices, the lie that 4 million people died at Auschwitz was maintained until the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

Then it did collapse, and they suddenly reduced the number from 4 million to 1 million and said:

 

“Well, we have known it all along.”

 

And then in an interview in 1998, this historian was asked:

 

“Well, why did you lie? Why did you make that up if you knew all along that it was wrong? Why didn’t you correct the number earlier when you knew that it was wrong?”

 

And he basically said:

 

“Well, there was a prohibition in place in the Eastern Bloc in the communist countries that historians who would not toe the party line could be facing.”

 

How he expressed it, “disciplinary measures”.

 

 

What does that mean? You lose your job, you’re getting demoted, you have to become a street sweeper, or a janitor. That’s what that means in these communist planned economies.

 

Ironically, 1998, that’s when he gave the interview. That was the same year Poland, pressured by the European Union, in particular Germany, introduced a law, 1998, that made Holocaust skepticism a crime punishable with up to three years in prison.

 

 

So from communist “disciplinary measures” to Democratic “three years in prison”. What’s worse? I’d take disciplinary measures anytime over prison term. So he said that:

 

“Now we can tell the truth! Back then we couldn’t because we had disciplinary measures. We’ve corrected. Now it’s 1 million. Because you need to believe us, because now we are only threatened with three years!”

 

Any mainstream person who thinks everything is kosher with the Holocaust narrative that we fed now must realize:

 

“Yeah, kosher it may be, it means the jews like it!”

 

But it most certainly doesn’t mean authentic and reliable, because historians who are threatened at gunpoint to write history cannot be trusted! He admits:

 

“We couldn’t be trusted! We have been lying. We knew we were lying. We did it intentionally, but we did so because we were threatened with getting demoted or losing our job!”

 

And now we should believe you when you are threatened with three years, with five years, with six years, with, 20 years! How much more do you need to teach people, to tell people, to realize you can’t trust these people! History at gunpoint does not give you the truth in no section of society!

 

 

So once you have opened up people’s mind and that they realize the dimension of persecution, of suppression, of oppression and the unique nature the Holocaust is unique in terms of the length governments go to and societies go to suppress dissent, to keep complete control over the narrative! Nowhere else in society will you find it. That shows you who is the main beneficiary usually is also the one who pushes most. And it shows you that this is for them the most important topic to keep total control over!

 

Once you have opened people mind:

 

“Something is fishy here! You can’t trust those historians because they have admitted they have lied when they were threatened even less than they are threatened today!”

 

Then we go to the pith, the center of the story. Now I handed it out to you guys, free of charge, a little brochure and I want to go through a few things here that you find actually in the brochure. If this thing is too far away from you, I apologize. But you’ll find some of this in this brochure.

 

[20:08]

 

 

And the first one I’m going to is actually on the last page, the back cover if you wish. You know that thing technically speaking has no back cover. You see a graph there, a bar chart that shows claims of death tolls for the Majdanek camp. Now I would assume that most of you, at least most of normal populace have not heard about the Majdanek! Camp. It’s not anymore a major player in the bigger picture of the Holocaust in terms of mass extermination. It used to be completely different. The Majdanek camp actually was officially called the Lublin camp in central Poland was overrun by the Red Army in July of 1944.

 

So it was first major camp that the Soviets overran. And in a press conference right after the conquest of the camp, and I say “conquest”, the Red Army never liberated anyone! So you will not hear the word “liberation” when it even comes to camps, when it comes to the Red Army.

 

 

So they conquered the camp. In the press conference they claimed 2 million people were murdered there. It was the first big, still doing the war propaganda campaign on extermination, claim that started in August 1944. Big show! With all the world media, invited journalists from everywhere and cameras rolling.

 

 

Now in subsequent events, the Poles later that year still during the war, by the way, December ’44 had a show trial. They claimed 1.7 million. That’s a little bit of a reduction, but they weren’t generous. It’s kind of the same order of magnitude.

 

 

The Soviets then during the International Military Tribunal introduced an expert report. They claimed 1.5 million. Still again, 500,000 difference is not immaterial. But in the bigger picture, looking at it scientifically, it’s kind of the same order of magnitude. We don’t want to be nitpicking here.

 

However, the frenzy of immediate end of the war or post-war propaganda comes to an end and things cool down a little bit. And a Polish investigative judge reduces the number down to 360,000. And this is a considerable drop!

 

 

We’re down to 80%! Now, as I just showed you, there is a rule in communist countries you have to toe the party line and the new party line was 360,000. Couldn’t really go underneath that, even though they knew again, they knew in this case too, it is wrong! I think the number of prisoners sent to the camp was around that order of magnitude. And that assumes that every single one of them was murdered. And there’s plenty of documentation shown that was absolutely not the case!

 

The Soviet Union collapses and the number gets reduced again by a new historian in charge of the museum. 235,000. Not all that extreme a drop if you compare it with Auschwitz, compared to these two. But here we have already almost only 10%.

 

 

But that wasn’t the end of it. We Holocaust skeptics went into the archives after the Soviet Union collapsed, 1994, 95, 96. And researched the whole material, published a investigation on it. And it was so devastatingly demasking the propaganda of the homicidal gas chamber story, that pressure on the Majdaneck museum became so big that eventually in 2005, a new generation, a new historian dropped the death toll to 76,000. And that is only not even 4% of the initial 2 million claim.

 

 

And actually from the beginning they had claimed seven homicidal gas chambers. They maintained that number until the end. But five of them were so ridiculously, obviously, technically impossible to have ever been used for what they claim to have been used that to throw propaganda ballast overboard.

 

 

 

Thomas Kranz, the new Polish historian, threw five of them overboard. So what we have is an admission:

 

“That okay, we exaggerated, we lied, we lied, we fix, we fix, we keep fixing, we drop more and more of these lies!”

 

And then that’s what the situation is here today. They keep shifting the goalposts, they keep reducing the claim. You see, something is fishy with their attitude in general. But now:

 

“They got it right!”

 

Really, when you’re threatened with three years in prison? Why would I believe you?

 

[24:48]

 

Now we could say:

 

“Okay, one camp. What does one camp prove? That’s the most extreme downward revision by the mainstream.”

 

I haven’t shown our number that would here in 98, we published the book.

 

 

We find in the historical record 42, 200 death cases and no homicidal death chambers at all! They were all fumigation chambers!

 

So I’m just showing you what the mainstream itself has admitted to have been wrong over and over again! Is it a singular case? People make mistakes. Corrections for other camps? If you go in the brochure, if you want to go on page six, you see the table there now the same table here, the major camps that played a role in Allied war as well as immediate post-war propaganda as claimed extermination camps.

 

 

You see the initial death toll here on the left numbers column. And the death toll that is claimed by the mainstream.

 

 

Again, I say in the mainstream, Holocaust skeptical numbers? What really can be documented and what is forensically possible is an entirely different story.

 

So I want to show you that if you just use their own arguments and their shifty way of moving goalposts, you should make every believer see something isn’t right. And you see it here, mistakes stray statistically from the true value. If I make a mistake, I may under or overestimate, but they should stray to both sides. Here you see only one tendency, extreme exaggeration!

 

 

That’s not called a mistake, that’s called a lie! Truth is always the first victim of every war. And why should it be any different with the Second World War? The victors write the history and they never write it objectively. And why should it be any different for the worst war ever fought that ended for the losing side in a major disaster that mankind has not seen all that often in history? Cathage and the Punic wars probably had a worse fate than Germany because they got completely wiped. But other than that, Germany was in pretty bad shape after the Second World War.

 

So you see here, these are lies! They have been lying systematically! They have been correcting and admitting in Auschwitz, I showed you here in Majdanek again and again they lied. They knew they’re lying. And now they are threatened even worse than they were before. The question.

 

 

So for my Majdanek, 96% of the victims were invented. 70% of the homicidal gas chambers were invented. They got it wrong repeatedly acting under coercion, still under coercion even worse so today! Why believe them uncritically now? You wouldn’t!

 

 

And it doesn’t stop with numbers. If you go on the second table of the page six here, we’re talking about invented methods. What the mainstream, again, what the mainstream has admitted, we’re looking in the second column here, of all the stuff that is actually has been invented.

 

 

And I actually added a few more here on this one. And here you see for Auschwitz, war gases, high voltage electrocution, gas showers, gas bombs, pneumatic hammer, conveyor belt.

 

 

Treblinka, you have machine guns, mobile gas chambers, stunning gas, unslaked lime, hot steam, high voltage, chlorine, ether, a death bridge, burning alive.

 

 

So it goes on and on for the other camps. Suffocation with human excrements as a mass murder method is claimed for Bełzec by one witness. It gets absurd at times. But of course, all this stuff, sometimes based on only one witness, sometimes based on tens of witnesses on all kinds of wartime reports, got dumped! Interestingly, the stories that prevailed during the war, hot steam for Treblinkaa, high voltage for Belzec, chlorine gas for Sobibor, all got dumped! You won’t find a word of it today anymore, even though they were the ones that were most commonly claimed during the war, and even during the International Military Tribunal, by the way. It’s all gone!

 

 

What we have left now is this. Zyklon B, and engine exhaust gases. For a long time they even claimed they were diesel exhaust gases, which are technically impossible because they’re not toxic enough.

 

 

Just recently, well, not too recently, 15 years ago, a mainstream toxicologist tried to move the goalpost there again:

 

“Okay, diesel doesn’t work. Why don’t we say it was engine exhaust?”

 

 

So murder methods claimed during and right after the war were highly contradictory. Even once claimed main murder methods were all abandoned! Polish Stalinist officials streamline the narrative against facts! And mainstream historians hide these extreme revisions and manipulations from you! Because they are writing history on gunpoint!

 

[29:58]

 

How was it done? To give you one example, and unfortunately I don’t think I have that in this brochure. You would actually have to go, because that goes a little bit more into detail for which this brochure doesn’t have room. I have that detailed example in this book here. Nazi Gas Chambers, which you can either buy there as a hard copy or you can find it on holocausthandbooks.com free of charge as an ebook.

 

 

The one case that shows everyone, and should show every normie that the story was faked, is the case of Sobibor! Now again, Auschwitz, everyone knows, Treblinka, some of you may have heard. Bełzec, maybe. Majdanek, unlikely. Sobibor also, not very often. Sobibor is one of the three so-called “pure extermination camps”. Actually four. Chelmno is a special camp. It’s a separate issue.

 

 

Treblinkaa, Belzec and Sobibor are the three big ones that were jews were shipped to be murdered and nothing else. That’s the claim of the mainstream. Sobibor was the smallest of them. Treblinka. The other here started out with 3 million. Belzec, 3 million claim and Sobibor with, 20 million. It’s down to 200,000 now, plus, minus. There’s always this kind of an average of the mainstream claim because they can’t really agree exactly on how much. But the other ones are way higher.

 

 

Sobibor is an interesting case. The same judge who after the war downgraded massively the death toll from Majdanek to 360,000 also investigated the Sobibor camp and the Treblinkaa camp and wrote the story for it for the Polish Commission for German War Crimes. He investigated a number of witnesses. They are listed here by name.

 

 

Right after the war, the inmates that were alive in summer of 1943 had a revolt in the Sobibor camp. There’s actually a movie about that. Not very historically accurate, but the revolt did take place and many witnesses, survivors or inmates, ran away and they ended up testifying in front of that investigative judge. This is Zdzislaw Tukaszkiewicz. Now the interesting thing is of what they told him. Right now for Sobibor, they claim engine exhaust gas as the murder method.

 

 

And they are supposed to have been murdered in just a normal chamber. One door. They walk in, they get killed with gas, the other door at the other end opens out and they get carried out to mass graves or pyres to be burned. That’s the mainstream narrative right now! However, if you look at what these witnesses testified, if they describe the alleged murder method, many of them said chlorine. Nobody said engine exhaust. Not a single witness!

 

 

What they claimed of the mechanics of the gas chamber is very interesting because they kind of agreed, with a few exceptions of witnesses who didn’t say anything about that.

 

 

That the floors in those chambers were hydraulically opened up, they collapsed downward, discharge the dead victims into two carts running on tracks below in some kind of basement area, and would then be driven out to mass graves or to cremation pyres. And they agreed on that you will not hear a single thing about that in the mainstream narrative! What Zdzislaw Tukaszkiewicz did when he wrote, based on his interrogations, that’s the only evidence he had, he said:

 

“Well, they were killed with engine exhaust and with just a normal gas chamber with doors.”

 

Invented out of the blue! With no basis in fact of any of the evidence! He threw out all the witnesses!

 

 

Now where did he get that narrative from? He actually copied it over. I just mentioned he had also investigated the Treblinka camp. He had copied it over from the narrative he had developed from the Treblinka camp!

 

 

And if you were to go there. I don’t want to go do that now again, you can find the list of witnesses and what they said on Treblinka in here. You find in Treblinka this chaos here! Electrocution, engine exhaust, gas, vacuum, steam, all kinds of claims. He cleaned that up, threw everything out, kept the engine exhaust and wrote the narrative according to that.

 

 

And then he copied it over to Sobibor. That is invented history with no basis in fact, none whatsoever in the case of Sobibor! The clearest case where you can absolutely pinpoint what happened.

 

So that is what you find if you go into the historical record, which became accessible to us only after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in the archives in the east became accessible. And we could actually go to these interrogation protocols and then see what narrative they made of it.

 

There is an interesting question that arises. Why was that done? I mean, it’s an obvious question. You want to look, make your enemy look as bad as possible. So whatever comes after the war, you can manipulate and destroy them as much as possible. Psychological warfare is just a continuation of warfare with other means. And ethnically speaking, the whole Second World War broke out because the actual tinderbox that blew it up, there were many more conflicts around the globe was the ethnic conflicts between Poles and Germans, mainly over the city of Danzig.

 

 

And after the war, as you may know, Poland gained huge territories from Germany and expelled the population. My paternal ancestry was expelled from Silesia, so they were part of the victims of that. And Germany was not willing after the First World War to accept the loss of Danzig, which was a 95% German city. How would you make them expect to accept the loss of a quarter of its entire territory and the expulsion of 7 million civilians from their homeland, where they had lived for centuries. And were not just a majority in large parts of the world, just only Germans, all gone! How do you accept Germany to this time accept it?

 

If you break the German spine with a guilt complex, you can make them accept anything as justified punishment. And that’s what the homicidal gas chambers are good for!

 

[36:49]

 

 

Now I’ve looked into all of the people who have done the investigation on those camps and who have written the history. We’re actually talking about only four individuals that were doing the investigation. I’ve mentioned Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz for Treblinka, for Majdanek and for Sobibor. Jan Sehn was investigative judge for Auschwitz. For Belzec we have an historian. There was no trial on Belzec. That was Eugeniusz Szrojt. And for Chelmno, which isn’t even on here, it’s a special case. There it is actually. It was Wladyslaw Bednarz.

 

So we have four Polish individuals all working for the Polish commission for the investigation of war crimes and Stalinist organization set up by Stalin to stick it to the Germans and to use all kinds of fishy methods, as I just said, and with the aim of destroying Germany psychologically and make them accept all that was coming their way. And it worked “beautifully”, quote, unquote.

 

If you present these things that way, I have found you can get people to understand first of all that it’s not some lunatic idea, but that there’s something profoundly wrong in a society that proscribes the writing of any scholarly field under the threat of punishment. And what that must lead to is untruthfulness of scholars. And then showing them, yeah, they have admitted over and over again to have lied, to have shifted the goalpost to hide facts from us, to completely change their story.

 

And then psychologically, very important, it’s not the jews who did it in a great conspiracy theory! That’s what I’m getting here. I’m not saying I want to win the jews over seeing how they were duped, they were. But you know, all those witnesses at the end of it, most of them are jews. They had an axe to grind. I can’t blame them. They were treated horribly. And in the frenzy of post-war propaganda, they were making stuff up!

 

And this is completely made up stuff here! And they even co-ordinated these witnesses. Coordinated, as they couldn’t have come up all with the same story. But the investigative judge couldn’t do anything with it. In other cases, they were so contradictory, they weren’t coordinating any of these witnesses. They were just inventing whatever came!

 

And in the complete frenzy of post-war anti-German hysteria, you can understand where they are coming from. It would have been the judge’s job to say:

 

“This is all nonsense! We can’t make head or tail out of it. And therefore, we need to say that!”

 

They didn’t do that. These judges were put in by the new Stalinist government. It was a Stalinist agenda. I couldn’t find any jewish backgrounds in any of those four individuals. I don’t know the chain of command. They did what they did on orders. Nothing of that kind of propagandistic political nature was left to chance.

 

So you can bet that there were orders coming from Warsaw and from Moscow. What type they were, this is the kind of investigation we have yet to do. Whether in that chain of command jews were sitting, I don’t know. But they are not needed. You can see here the Stalinist will to completely destroy psychologically Germany and to pit Poland against Germany. That is an important point.

 

Hitler had tried until 39, until the very last moment, to win the Poles over for an anti-communist pact against Stalinist Russia. And Stalinist Russia tried to conquer all of Europe. That was the declared concept of world revolution from 1918 onward. It wasn’t a secret! And Hitler tried to make a bulwark, a European fortress against Stalin’s plan to conquer all of Europe. Poland refused and went their way of poking the German eagle to the point where they lashed out. And the rest is history.

 

[40:46]

 

Pitting Poland against Germany.

Any other normal nation, if you imagine Mexico in a World War that breaks out between Russia, China and the United States, United States loses and then Mexico gets everything that they used to own and more. You name the States of Texas, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, California. Give everything to the Mexicans and drive out every White American. Would America put up with it if they gain strength again? How do you get the Germans to accept that kind of calamity? It worked. What did not work, and I want to make that sure, even though my parents were expelled, my parental ancestors were expelled from that region is that today Germany and Poland are not pitted against each other anymore.

 

I’ve gone with my father to our Poles who had expelled him and his family in the 1980s and 90s. German expellees went back to Poland to party with our Poles in the house it used to belong to my grandfather! There’s no frontier, no border between Germany and Poland anymore. If I wanted, the German government not sticking me in prison for other reasons, I could go back and settle where my parental ancestors came from. That story is over in Europe! We don’t kill each other. We don’t kill White people over territory. That should be the case. Unfortunately, the Russians and the Ukrainians have yet to learn that lesson. That is over. Stalin did not succeed in pitting us against each other, we work together now.

 

I am saying these things in order to make you understand where this come from, how it was done, who did it, why they did it! Not in order to, say, give Germany its territories, they can’t even populate their current territory, nor can the Poles. The real biggest challenge for all of us in Europe is population collapse, which is something I will talk about tonight, by the way, and how this ties in to all these issues that I’ve been talking about historically.

 

So now we are not talking territories here. We’re talking about historical understanding and to make the jews understand, and the Zionists, we’re not coming after you. We’re not blaming you for having constructed this narrative in order to whatever. Sure, they took advantage of it, particularly since 1961 when the gravy train was already running with the Eichmann trial big time, and ever since have been profited from that.

 

But if you look in the first decades of the state of Israel and of the jewish community, particularly in this country, they were not riding the Holocaust train! It wasn’t even called that, way back then. The partial identity between Soviet spies in the United States and a religious jewish background was troublesome truth for the jewish community. They kept their head low in the early years of the Cold War and were not rocking the boat.

 

So this way you can make even the jews see we’re not out for revenge for what you did to us, psychologically. The story came from a different angle. And I think that is because people assume we are spreading these Holocaust “denial theories”, as they call them, in order to get at the jews, in order to say the jews have made this big conspiracy in order to get us and destroy us. Yeah, it’s being used now as such. This is what happens now with them manipulating us with this and saying in order to prevent anything like that happening again, we must allow and support them to pre-emptively kill everyone that even looks askance at them! Which is what’s happening in Gaza and what the conflict with many of these nations in the Middle East with Israel is about. That’s a separate story where we are today.

 

Historically seen as it started differently and it has taken on its own life. And we need to break that vicious circle we are in, using this presumed genocide, say what happens to the jews as we define genocide by the United Nations and in law, actually it was a genocide. You don’t need gas chambers to commit genocide. If you separate people so that they can’t reproduce, it’s already called genocide. And that’s what the National Socialists did in the camps, separating genders and putting them under living conditions that inevitably had to lead to many of them dying of disease and so forth. So technically speaking, legally speaking, how it is defined today, it was genocide. Now, that law didn’t exist back then. That’s a legal fine print.

 

So this genocide in its downgraded fashion without homicidal gas chambers, which didn’t exist, but the homicidal gas chambers being the foremost psychological weapon to traumatize the jews, young jews of new generation today and every one of us, we have gone through this education and know how shocking it is to see these bulldozers shoving corpses into mass graves at Bergen-Belsen and being told that’s what the Germans did to the jews. That was force majeure* of epidemics breaking out in camps that the Germans had no control over. They didn’t plan that. But you’re not being told that.

 

And the effect of it is that America for the most part is willing to go along, and Europe, to go along with what the jews and Zionists do in the Middle East. To break that vicious circle, to get a correct understanding, we can learn the correct lessons of history only if we get first the facts straight. And no matter what the facts are, morally speaking, you are never allowed to use past catastrophes of whatever nature to justify or foment current and future catastrophes! And that’s what’s happening. In order to prevent a new “Holocaust”, Israel is committing genocide.

 

[46:54]

 

So in order to prevent genocide, they commit genocide! There’s something wrong with this! And to see how we are manipulated with historical accounts being exaggerated and invented, to see it in this old example, the most extreme example, makes us see that happens all the time. What was it October 7, 2023, what happened there. Israel has a law outlawing, as I just mentioned, it was the first one outlawing Holocaust skepticism. And they have now introduced a law outlawing Gaza skepticism in terms of just what happened on the 7th of October. And they are probably in the process of making it a crime to accuse Israel of genocide.

 

All right, I’m having, as I mentioned, a second presentation tonight. We are talking about demographic collapse and where that leaves us, which options we have and what the various drivers are, which Holocaust propaganda actually is one of them. And I’ll explain that tonight. I hope I’ll get a chance to talk to you and maybe even discuss that with you guys.

 

 

If you want to look into this book, if you don’t have it yet, about how this core of the Holocaust, the homicide, gas chamber story, was created. As I mentioned there you can have it.

 

 

The encyclopedia also. I still have six copies floating around. Please keep the brochure. It is a short description and summary of Holocaust revisionist arguments with reference of all the books. You can find them all free of charge at holocausthandbooks.com. But you can also buy them from us on these websites and you’ll find links to purchase them.

 

And if you don’t want to keep it, leave it on the table and we’ll collect it later because this is advertising for our products, for our knowledge, for our insight, and we liked it to get spread.

 

So thank you for your attention.

 

[49:00]

 

[loud applause]

 

[Outro message]

 

 

If you want to learn more, here are a few suggested websites. At our Holocaust Encyclopedia you can find concise information on almost 600 related topics with references to further reading.

 

 

 

The results of 35 years of archival and forensic research into the Holocaust can be accessed free of charge at our Holocaust Handbooks website, where you can also access several documentaries as well as our Mini Series Holocaust Pocketbooks, which give easy to read introductions into various topics.

 

 

 

Printed copies of these and many other books can be purchased on our websites armreg.us and armreg.co.uk.

 

 

At our Holocaust Academy, we teach the ropes of skeptical Holocaust research.

 

 

 

It also features our growing podcast series named “Holocast”.

 

 

At the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, we lobby for free speech where it is threatened the most.

 

 

Most prominently with our periodical Inconvenient History.

 

And last but not least, Germar Rudolf’s personal website where you can learn more about him.

 

 

[50:22]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/23/2026 = 3)

Unlocking_Freedom
5 days ago
This video is so important. Discussing with a normie has many challenges, layers of brain washing, mind control by legacy media. https://www.printernational.co.uk/timmann2/history.htm#holocaust Approaching such a sensitive subject, especially with relatives is so hard. Yes the method of just sciences : Biology : Cholera, Tuberculosis (TB), Famine, Dysentery and Typhoid (Typhus) were at epidemic levels of disease Engineering : Wooden Doors, Floor Drains in a “gas chamber” Architecture : Swinging Doors Chemistry : Residue in the walls This video is a better beginning because the banning is a serious question for thought control. Exaggeration to Reduction in numbers comes from the authorities, which normies only will accept. Changing method of executions. There is no consistency.
1
0

Lueger
1 week ago
https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000207&FassungVom=2023-01-08 interesting history of the modifications of this “Verbotsgesetz 1947” in Austria

‹ Hide 1 reply
Lueger
1 week ago
The AI could not identify a legislative or political donor impetus for the 1992 amendment, but that the “1992 Verbotsgesetz amendment was adopted by the Austrian Parliament with broad cross‑party support; it was driven by government and parliamentary lawmakers (major parties including the SPÖ and ÖVP), backed publicly by Jewish organizations and civil‑society groups concerned about rising neo‑Nazi activity and legal inconsistency. Major identifiable supporters were: Parliamentary sponsors and supporters: members of the governing parties at the time (Social Democratic Party — SPÖ — and Austrian People’s Party — ÖVP) who voted for the amendment in Parliament. Wikipedia Civil-society and community backers: Austrian Jewish organizations and international Jewish groups, prosecutors and legal scholars who urged a clear statutory prohibition to close court inconsistencies and enable prosecutions.” I asked it to enumerate and identify the neo-nazi events, which it indicated would take 30 minutes. Bin gespannt.
0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to tonight’s stream. We’re live on Odysee, Rumble, DLive and Entropy. And I’ve got a wonderful panel for you here tonight to discuss the big issue of, well, the last week or so, and it’s obviously Trump’s war for Israel or Trump’s war on Iran for Israel, to be more precise.

 

Now, the guys I’ve got with me I’ll be introducing shortly. It’s of course Natty and Yuro from the Nationalist A-Team. We’re going to cover some of the things we covered last Sunday quickly. And then we’re going to go deeper into things. Everyone’s going to get roughly an equal time to talk. I’m not going to be putting people on an egg timer, but we’ve probably got nine or ten topics and if everyone puts sort of three, four minutes into each topic, it’ll be about a 90 minute presentation. So stick around. It’s going to be pretty entertaining or at least pretty enlightening.

 

You might have noticed I’m not on camera tonight. My apologies for that it’s not because I’m being rude. Slightly under the weather today, actually. I don’t know whether I sound it and if I do, my apologies. But I am doing my best to essentially be as chirpy as humanly possible, all things considered.

 

Now, if you like this stream, please share it. If you really like this dream, please consider making a donation. Please consider contributing to my work. You can do so via Entropy and also directly through Rumble. Anything that is sent tonight, any Superchat, any donation that has a message attached, the message will be read out live on tonight’s stream.

 

So we will talk about that. So if you’ve got a different point of view, if you’ve got something you want to raise, if you think we’ve missed something, or if you just say:

 

“Look, Mark, I really appreciate the fact that you’ve been consistent for the last, 26 years and I want to keep you fighting even though you’re banned from everywhere.”

 

I appreciate that as well.

 

So thank you in advance for everyone who Superchats. You can also donate by crypto all the crypto links in the description below.

 

And finally you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Although I didn’t answer emails this morning, again under the weather. So sorry guys, back to things on Monday. Unless I’ve got some kind of horrible illness that drags on past then and sort of takes me out, which I’m sure I haven’t. That’s quite a morbid thought. Anyway! We are going to get into it now, but before we do that, let’s go around the group and we’ll introduce everyone.

 

Now, the first is of course Natty. You know him from the Nationalist A-Team and also from numerous other streams that he’s done with me in the past. Natty’s a guy that’s been around since the beginning of PA. He’s been to all the meetings, at conferences, camps, etc, and he’s always someone that everyone likes hearing from.

 

In fact, I always say that if I had a wingman on PWR, it would be this guy here. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? I hope you are well.

 

Natty: Yeah, I’m good. I’m enjoying watching Tel Aviv burn. I’m sure we’re gonna talk about the ins and outs of what that means, but yeah, I’m good apart from that it’s been a bit of a crazy week trying to keep up with everything and I think my wife has suffered constantly looking across at me and seeing my face buried in my phone because I’m trying to, I’m monitoring the situation. But yeah, it’s very interesting times.

 

Mark Collett: Do you ever get it where you’re out on the sort of a supposed family event and the wife’s like:

 

“Why aren’t you paying any attention? All you’re doing is sitting on the phone. What can be so important that you need to be on your phone at this family event?”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Look, you know, Israel is on fire. Tel Aviv is being hit with hypersonic missiles. Chill out!”

 

Natty: It’s like:

 

“Honey, there’s cluster munitions going off above a suburb in Tel Aviv. This is really important. [chuckling] I’m watching it right now! It’s amazing!”

 

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] that’s kind of that’s kind of the str. I’d say that that’s the struggle that we have.!

 

Anyway, we’ve also got Yuro with us tonight. He’s obviously famous because Yuro used to do The Absolute State of Britain podcast.

 

And again, he’s a very able wing man. He has been on the National A-Team standing in for Sam. He always has good takes, he’s a funny guy and sometimes I bully him a bit, which is a little unfair, but that’s because I love him and see him as like my little brother, My little brother who needs the odd sort of monkey scrub and jab in the ribs, but he’s like my little brother, so I still love him.

 

Anyway, Yuro, how are you doing, my friend?

 

Yuro: I’m good. I’ve also been keenly paying attention watching Middle East Spectator and other such channels on Telegram. You know, it’s, I think there’s a lot more censorship obviously during the 12 Day War that was going on between Iran and Israel before. It was very much like:

 

“Well, what can we believe? How much are they not showing you?”

 

And it’s just that more. So we see all of Iran’s failures and then some things that’s like disinfo and we see all of Israel’s successes and then some, and some of that’s disinfo. And it’s kind of hard to even know what’s real.

 

[04:47]

 

Natty: That’s a good point actually because just briefly, it does seem like the information blackout from Israel was way more intense during the 12 Day War. And it seems like now because of the scope and the breadth of everything, just more is getting through or you’re able to find out more. And I’m sure this isn’t true, if you check the BBC or just some other like ZOG regime outlet, you’re not going to be seeing anything hitting Israel. But that’s what everyone’s interested in. That’s what everyone wants to see. [chuckling] You know, how many hypersonics hit Tel Aviv? This time, you know what US asset has just been blown up by a drone in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain or wherever it is. That’s what people are interested in seeing. They want to see the underdog smacking the bully in the mouth. And that’s what happens when a cheap Shahed drone gets through a multi-million dollar interceptor screen and like blows up a THAAD [Terminal High Altitude Area Defense] radar system or something. That’s what everyone’s into, right? Everyone wants to see that. No one wants to see like Iranian suburbs being like caught on fire and hit with JDAMs and hit with Tomahawk missiles because that’s just brutal civilian casualties, which is what ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] is good at.

 

Yuro: Well, the funny thing is to see America in this war using the copy of the Iranian kamikaze drones. They’ve got their own basically one to one copy of the Shahed drone that they’ve now rolled out and they’re starting to fire back at the Iranians. Because it was just like the near perfect design that they’re like:

 

“We can’t make any better than this. We’re just going to copy it.”

 

Natty: Yeah. You know, for the grand and mighty American empire is reverse engineering Third World brownoid country drones [chuckling] that sound like lawnmowers when they’re flying through the sky!

 

But yeah, that’s what America’s up to these days. I mean, you can’t really claim it’s the European heritage stock that’s like the most genius country in the world. It’s just not that anymore, I’m afraid, guys.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. But we’ve got a lot to talk about. So and we do actually have just. We do have a little sort of running order as well, tonight. I’m not going to read it out, but I was going to post it actually and say:

 

“Look, these are all the things we’ll be discussing.”

 

But there’s a lot to discuss and we’re going to go through things from the start. Now we’re going to speed run some of the bits we talked about on the Nationalist A-Team because for anyone who watched the Nationalist A-Team and enjoys it, look, it is a banger of a stream, except for when I get killed by somebody and get upset.

 

But other than that! It is a good stream. And if you want to watch it, there’s some takes there. And also there’s the Patriarch there as well who provides quite a lot of good comedy.

 

Anyway, so we’re going to start with the wider justification for this because there’s nowhere better to start than the official justification. Now, I’ve seen these videos where Netanyahu, they’re sort of like compilation videos of every time Netanyahu is claimed that Iran is sort of five months, five weeks, you know, two years from getting the atomic bomb. And he’s been doing this, believe it or not, for over 30 years!

 

So the first example I’ve seen of Netanyahu saying that Iran is just moments away from like nuclear weapon capability was actually all the way back in 1995. And the reason that’s interesting, …

 

Yuro: There are people dying in this war on the American side who have not been alive longer than Iran was supposedly two weeks away from a nuclear weapon!

 

Mark Collett: That’s a very good point. That is Yuro. But you get minus points for butting in. You’ve been told about that.

 

Natty: Oh, no [word unclear] battalion!

 

Mark Collett: Wiffle bat to give you a spanking. Right. So these fake nuclear claims that are interesting for two reasons.

 

Firstly, because they are blatantly fake! It’s been, to my knowledge, 31 years. And Yuro does make, … Look to Yuro’s credit, he makes a very good point. You know, the idea that this has been going on longer than some of the people on these American battleships have been alive is incredible!

 

But one thing that struck me immediately with this was I remember living through the time of the Iraq war. And at the time of the Iraq war, Weapons of Mass Destruction became one of the most maligned phrases to have ever been used in British Parliament, to the point that where if you now say “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, it’s sort of synonymous with war crimes, lies and a regime that took us into what was essentially an illegal war. You know, there was no Weapons of Mass Destruction.

 

But one thing that shocks me is this is the kind of thing where people just seem to have either forgotten this or put it to one side.

 

So the Daily Mail is a classic example of this. The Daily Mail is sort of the populist Right-wing, you know, vote Reform, consider voting Conservative newspaper. And they were all against Blair and the Weapons of Mass Destruction and exposing his lies and speaking out about it once it was exposed via the Chilcot inquiry.

 

But now the Daily Mail, like:

 

“We need this war. You know, usually we’re against war, but in this instance, this needs to happen!”

 

And you’ve got all these shill commenters in the sections underneath the Daily Mail articles in the comment sections, and they’re all saying things like:

 

“Oh, I’m against the war, but this is an exception.”

 

And I don’t know whether these are real people, idiot Boomer types or that’s not all Boomers. But you know, the sort. I mean the kind of person that says:

 

“Oh, well, I’m against the people on the small boats, but I would let the genuine refugees in all. Yes! And if somebody comes here and learns to speak English, well, he’s as British as Yorkshire pudding, isn’t he!”

 

Those sort. Is it one of them or is it a shill account?

 

[11:04]

 

But I think it’s really interesting that exactly the same justification for the attack is being used, as was used in Iraq. But the Iraq, War retrospectively is possibly the most maligned conflict and the conflict seen as the most unjust conflict. Probably post World War II. I’d have said that would have gone to Vietnam at one point, but Iraq seems to have, maybe because it’s more recent, seems to have eclipsed that.

 

So what do you guys think?

 

We’ll start with you, Natty. Obviously this is what they’re saying and we’re going to discuss next the real reason and what we think the real reason is. But what do you think to this sort of fake reasoning for going to war?

 

Natty: Well, just listening to you there, I haven’t done this because I was just reminded by what you said. But I’m fairly certain if you went back to the 2000s and had a look at the lead up to the Iraq war, you, amongst the Daily Mail articles, you wouldn’t find opposition to the actual war itself, because none of these publications were really opposed to it in any meaningful way and certainly weren’t like trying to rally people against the war. So you know, post Iraq war when everyone was kind of saying what disaster it was, I’m sure the Daily Mail were jumping on board that.

 

But as even now publications that you would think would be against the war in Iran are kind of talking around the edge of it whilst not decrying the war and certainly not being like anti-war, like proper anti-war publications and laying out all the connections between the Epstein regime and the people connecting in it like Mandelson and like Boris Johnson and Tony Blair and all the rest of it.

 

But yeah, it’s striking. I mean, one of the things I put in the chat earlier was that before this happened. Well, okay, let’s let me take it back a little bit. Before Iraq, the reason why the term “Weapons of Mass Destruction” became such a big thing is because the media and the government, Blair’s regime spent so much time and energy trying to get public approval for it, because they felt like, they obviously felt like they needed it. They needed a justification. They needed something to sell to the British people as to why it was a good idea, why it was necessary to go into Iraq.

 

Now that just hasn’t happened this time. Because I think they understand that the forces controlling the “Epstein Empire” as people are calling it, which is fairly apt, simply are not in the shadows anymore. You know, this stuff has been laid out. Israel is pulling the strings and it’s pulling the strings of America and it’s America’s pulling the strings of Europe because essentially Europe is just a colony of the United States. So they don’t feel they need to justify it so much.

 

Now, obviously there’s like regime mouthpieces and stoolies like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray, the Daily Mail and all the rest of it, who are now going out there and running cover and trying to make this war popular or make it so that it seems like:

 

“Well, it’s not a job any of us want to do, but it’s necessary and we need to do this for stability and peace!”

 

But I just don’t think the public are buying it. And the public for the most part didn’t buy it with Iraq, but that doesn’t stop that happening. And they’re not buying it with Iran either.

 

But there hasn’t been a groundswell of opposition to it in the same way as Iraq because they haven’t spent so long trying to justify it. And for a lot of people this just came out the blue. Not for anyone who’s kind of a properly dissident to the kind of Epstein Empire. This didn’t come out of the blue. This was fairly predictable. But probably just for your average person sitting at home and getting on with life, this kind of immediate blow up in the Middle East, where oil prices are about to skyrocket, petrol prices creeping up and we’re probably about to experience an energy crisis, just came out straight out of the blue! And the justifications, unlike Iraq, are all post hoc. They, it wasn’t a media build up to a war, it’s like a media cover plot after the war has started.

 

Yuro: What I find interesting as well is as you say, with the Iraq thing, there was a lot of build up and there was:

 

“Let’s get the UN involved, let’s condemn them, let’s build a coalition, let’s get Britain involved.”

 

But the other thing is they never said Iraq has a nuke. It was always this nebulous “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. And it’s kind of like the, well, we’re going to say that they have Weapons of Mass Destruction and that’s like we will say:

 

“Oh, actually they have chemical weapons which we’re going to classify as Weapons of Mass Destruction. And we’re going to hope that we can gin that up in people’s minds to be like, ‘Oh, they have a nuclear weapon’.”

 

And it was like:

 

“We won’t explicitly state they have a nuclear weapon. We’ll just try and make people think they have a nuclear weapon.”

 

And then there was the thing about:

 

“They can strike us in 45 minutes with their Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But now they just come out and say:

 

“They’re building a nuke!”

 

It’s not Weapons of Mass Destruction. And as you say, that’s because the term is just completely lost all validity. You know, people at the moment, they hear that, they just know it’s Iraq, War 2. But they’re not even like trying to do that lesser thing.

 

It’s kind of like what they do with racism, where you’ve got like the small definition and the big definition. The Weapons of Mass Destruction is like what they do with racism.

 

So if you’re a “racist”, it’s like you just think that different people are different and you care about your own people. Well, that’s a racist. But the moment you get labelled a racist, it’s like you’re a “supremacist who wants to murder everyone who’s not you”. Well, the Weapons of Mass Destruction is chemical weapons could be a weapon of mass destruction, but the moment you get labelled with that, all of a sudden:

 

“You’ve got nukes, you’re dangerous!”

 

[17:31]

 

Natty: Yeah. And the 45 minute claim was like, they can hit the tip of Cyprus. If they drive a Scud launcher right to the edge of the Iraqi border and fire it, they might just be able to hit Cyprus! And that was translated into British headlines as “British territory”. Yeah:

 

“They can hit us in 45 minutes! Oh my God, the sky’s falling!”

 

And the reality was, it was Scud missiles and some Sarin gas artillery shells which have a range of about 10 or 15 kilometers, which they used in Halabja [1988 against Kurds] apparently. I mean, we saw, I, we got trained on that in the CBRA regiment of what happened in Halabja with the Sarin gas shells. But that was passed into, like you said, Weapons of Mass Destruction. Very nebulous. Well, not easy to disseminate term, but very little detail and very little meaning. And you could say to people:

 

“Well, they’ve got Scud launches on trucks which can fly however many kilometers it is, and they’ve got some Sarin gas shells.”

 

But these, in terms of where the United Kingdom is and the rest of Europe, these are absolutely meaningless! And again, it was just to justify the Greater Israel Project and take out one of Israel’s enemies and destroy one of Israel’s enemies.

 

Yuro: Well, I was having to think about this before we started this stream. And I said to myself, you know:

 

“There is one state, there is a rogue state in the Middle East that has Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

 

And by that I mean a boatload of actual nuclear weapons. And they have the capability of targeting Britain, …

 

Natty: And if rumours are to be believed, then the Samson Option is a real thing and Israel is the lunatic state that has no compunction about using these things. Now, I don’t know if that’s a real thing or whether that’s just something that gets disseminated to scare everyone.

 

But you’ve got to remember the only people who have used nukes as an actual weapon of war against living targets is the Epstein Regime in the Second World War. And I don’t separate the people who are running America now from those people. I mean, it’s the same group of people.

 

Yuro: If you look at the way that they behave on the world stage, the way that they behave against the Palestinians, the way that they behave against the Iranians, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to just lash out at everyone else for “not defending them hard enough”. But according to the publicly available information, they have intercontinental ballistic missiles with a range of 11 and a half thousand kilometers, which basically means they can hit everywhere on the planet with the exception of kind of east Australia, New Zealand and some bits of South America.

 

Natty: So those parts of South America where all the Nazis fled to, so unfortunately they [chuckling] can’t touch them!

 

Yuro: The parts where Javier Milei, who’s converted to Judaism, is currently in charge.

 

Natty: Oh no!

 

Yuro: And they might also not be able to quite hit Mexico where (((Claudia Sheinbaum))) is in charge.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, dear! Well, talking about the control that jews wield, let’s talk about what we think is the real reason for this.

 

Now, I’m going to go straight out and say it. I believe the real reason for this is the Greater Israel Project. I think the Greater Israel Project is something that has gathered pace in the last few years, especially under Trump. We’ve seen the attacks on Gaza, we’ve seen the attacks on Lebanon. We’ve seen the fall of the Syrian regime, which was obviously heavily influenced by Israel, who were helping Islamic terrorists in the region. You know, the head chopper ones that we’re told are the great threat to peace and justice and decency, yet Israel is actually supporting those people!

 

And we’ve also seen Israel be involved in the fall of other regimes. Israel were famously involved. And this came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. I actually did a video on this. Israel were very famously involved with meeting, … And Tony Blair admitted this under oath in the Chilcot Inquiry. He met influential jewish leaders from the then current Israeli regime. And he said:

 

“The meetings had nothing to do with military intelligence. They had everything to do with overall strategy and long term goals.”

 

So take that as you will. But I’m taking that as they were heavily involved in getting rid of Saddam Hussein.

 

[22:24]

 

And I think it’s obviously within Israel’s interest to topple almost every sovereign regime in the region. And they do this quite openly. They are doing it more openly now. They’re getting away with it, sadly. And this is a blatant example of that. Although they’ve loosely talked about the nuke thing, like we said, Natty did make an important point that they felt it’s less necessary to sell this like they sold the Iraq, War. And in some interviews, members of the American regime have simply said:

 

“Yeah, we just want to kill these people. We want to kill them, we want to take them out. This is about regime change. This is about Israel.”

 

And I believe it was Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, who said:

 

“It was Israel who forced our hand. They began this and we are there to defend them and assist them. So when they began the attacks, we were forced into going along with it.”

 

Now, Trump then furiously denied this, but it’s a very interesting admission from Marco Rubio.

 

So I think this is all about the Greater Israel Project. And I believe that has been the driving force or the driving ideology behind the destabilisation of the Middle East.

 

Natty: Yeah, totally! And it kind of behooves me to say this and to get people to realise that whereas we’re living kind of day to day and prices of things go up and you’re worried about your children. We’ve been totally separated from any idea of our history and our lineage and where we’ve come from and where we might be going.

 

So it’s kind of hard to understand for us the jewish mindset. And this is a plan that’s been in the making for a very long time, years, decades, where once Israel was created and they have a vision of the Greater Israel Project. There’s a whole, there’s a list of countries. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt. And through various machinations, they’ve all been, one by one, they’ve been taken out or pacified. Egypt is basically paid off by the United States and is under the sway of Israel, has a border with Israel, but it doesn’t do anything about their genociding of the Palestinians and the destabilising and eventual collapse of the Syrian state. What happened in Libya with Gaddafi ending up with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street, and the subsequent flooding of Europe with migrants, which is a kind of side issue we can get onto if you want. But all of this, …

 

Mark Collett: I’ve got that further down the line, mate, that comes at the end, if you look at the show notes, I’ve actually said:

 

“You know, what are the actual repercussions for this, both for the West and for the Middle East?”

 

And that’s one of the things we will talk about.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. And it’s clear now, I mean, in my opinion and the opinion of other people who have been following this, that the reason Trump was so heavily pushed into a second term was that the people who are running him and the jews in Israel believe that he was the best chance of getting this done. You know, this final push to topple Iran, which basically gets rid of the last bastion of resistance to Israel. And you’ve got to think:

 

“Well, why is Israel so hell bent on getting rid of people who resist them?”

 

You think, well, the people who are opposing them, the only real people who are opposing them, committing genocide in Gaza, Europe was on board with it. The United States was supplying them with bombs and had carrier groups in the Mediterranean. The United Kingdom, our own government, was flying surveillance flights over Gaza and letting Cyprus be used as a refueling and an air base for Israel. So Europe was aiding in the genocide in Gaza.

 

And it was only Hezbollah and you know, funded via Iran that was really attacking, and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who were attacking Israel and trying to hold them account for genociding the Gazan people. And that’s unacceptable for Israel to have that resistance in the region, even though the attacks on it are totally justified and being used as like, defense against people who are being hurt and destroyed in this like, brutal way by this lunatic, lunatic group of people who have been squatting on the edge of a Mediterranean.

 

So the justifications the real justification is the toppling of Iran as a coherent state. And I’ll touch on this before I pass this over to Yuro. But there’s talk of regime change. You know, that’s what they say:

 

“We’re trying to enact regime change here.”

 

But that isn’t quite true. They’re not really interested in a regime swap where they swap one regime for another. What they’re interested in is total destabilisation! Just like with Syria, just like with Iraq, just like with Libya, where these are just failed states with tribal warlords with like Mossad and CIA run groups running around HTS, ISIS, all of these people. Which means no coherent defense, no missile bases, no civil defense, nothing! Just a load of groups that you can pay this group to fight this group and you know, you can pay these guys or stop paying these guys and just let chaos reign while Israel just expands and expands and expands and gets to do what it wants.

 

You know, kind of reminiscent, I’ll just finish on this. Kind of reminiscent to how if you import millions and millions of foreign people into a small island nation, it also becomes destabilised and coherent resistance or coherent defense or coherent politics kind of become very difficult and a very well motivated minority can rule the lot! So there’s your answer as to the real reasons for this war.

 

[28:45]

 

 

Yuro: A few things I wanted to pick up on there. Just as Mark was speaking, you kept using the term “regime”. And that’s like one of those MKUltra trigger words that they’ve put in people’s minds that like “regime is bad, regime is authoritarian, evil government”. It was all it was always the “Saddam regime” and the “Iran regime”. They’re just governments. They’re a different form of government. You know some of them are more or less Democratic than others, but it’s like this regime thing is a trigger word. And along that same lines, Natty, you mentioned the Houthis as “rebels”. I think the ones that we call Houthis are pretty much just the government of Yemen now. I mean, and they have pockets of what’s left of the people that they overthrew. But they’re basically just the government of Yemen. They’re not rebels anymore. They’re not a regime, they’re just that government.

 

But obviously this was all part of a plan. This is something that they’ve been going at for a very long time. They had the Project for a New American Century [PNAC] where they said we want to hit like seven countries in 10 years. And they’ve basically got all of them.

 

I mean, they wanted to get Iraq, they wanted to get Syria, they wanted to get Libya, and of course it’s neocon jews behind it all.

 

So that’s been happening for a very long time. There’s a reason why they caught a bunch of jewish Israelis dancing on 911*, already filming before the first plane went into those towers. They were dancing around, they were happy because they knew that was the excuse that they needed to start their own genocidal campaign. And it’s like dominoes falling. They get this one, then they get that one. And I mean, what happens to Libya? He, Gaddafi, gave up his weapons, chemical weapons and things like that.

 

[* 9/11: A false flag carried out by ZOG with Israel being the lead behind its planning and execution. The aim was to unleash the War OF Terror on the countries around Israel, among other aims. See See Also links below, especially the work by Christopher Bollyn.]

 

And as soon as they were gone, they were like:

 

“Right, well he’s defenseless, we can go in there and kill him now!”

 

So that’s what they proceeded to do.

 

And the other thing as well, like looking at what they’re doing to Iran, I mean, you talked about them wanting to destabilise them. As far as I understand, because they can’t really hit these military targets. They don’t know exactly where all the underground bases are and where they’re being launched from. So they’re targeting, I mean, apart from like primary schools for girls and things like that, which they do just because they’re evil and want to blow up kids when they’re not abusing kids in other ways, they’re just like targeting police stations and things like that. Just like blow up all the police stations in the country and hope it destabilises that way!

 

And of course they had this gayop a few weeks ago, maybe a month ago now, where they tried to incite some sort of terrorist uprising in Iran and that failed.

 

And obviously they wanted to coincide these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: But I was going to say that was obviously hilariously mistimed. [chuckling] Right? So they fermented this terrorist uprising and meanwhile they haven’t got all like the military assets in place to strike it. I mean, you might have a better idea of this than me, you guys, but maybe they thought in the January uprisings that they like funded all these terrorist groups to try and overthrow the government of Iran. Maybe they thought that it was still going to be going on now while they moved all these carrier groups and pulled their troops out of the Gulf oil state bases. Maybe they thought it was still going to be going on and that the Iran government was still going to be fighting these guys, but it was crushed within like a few days. Right!

 

Yuro: I have a feeling that maybe they were trying to like wait a little bit longer, but it was about to be compromised and they thought:

 

“If we don’t do it now, we miss the opportunity entirely.”

 

So they had to launch it. And they spent so long getting carriers into place to attack Iran because they’ve had these problems with the sewage system on the Gerald Ford, which obviously some people are saying that’s like a deliberate thing, that soldiers or sailors have clogged the tubes on purpose to destroy the system because they don’t want to go and die and be the next false flag. But they’ve had problems with that before. So it’s not entirely out of the realms of possibility that it is sort of coincidental to some degree.

 

But yeah, obviously that was something that delayed them. So I mean we can be glad about that because it’s meant that Iran’s not facing these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: I’m not sure. Look, I’m not a, like a military analyst or anything, but I’m not sure even if the like Epstein empire, the Epstein regime, had fermented this terrorist uprising whilst they carried out this first strike against Khomeini in a little girl’s school for some reason, whether if those two things occurred, coincided, even then, whether they’d have been able to pull off this kind of toppling of the regime. It seems like, …

 

Yuro: Regime?

 

Natty: Look, [chuckling] it’s the word everyone uses here! I can try, but I’m as susceptible to the MKUltra* terms as everyone else. Right? I’m just not sure it would have worked even if they had pulled it off at the same time.

 

[* MKUltra was a covert program run by the CIA from 1953 to 1973. Its primary goal was to explore methods of mind control and behavior modification through various means, including drugs and psychological techniques. MKUltra is widely condemned for its unethical practices, including: Lack of Consent: Many subjects were unaware they were part of experiments. Abusive Techniques: Included torture, isolation, and drugging without consent. The term MKUltra is a CIA cryptonym: “MK” is an arbitrary prefix standing for the Office of Technical Service and “Ultra” is an arbitrary word out of a dictionary used to name this project.]

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’re going to go on to that anyway, so let’s move a little bit further forward because there are other things we want to talk about.

 

Now, I think the next thing we need to talk about, we’ve placed this into context, talk about the Greater Israel Project. Now I think the next thing that’s very important is discussing the issue of these fake negotiations that America has had with the likes of Iran before all of this kicked off.

 

And they obviously had similar sort of fake negotiations with, I think it was Venezuela, didn’t they? And then they go in anyway. This is something that America started doing, you know, fake negotiations, but then we come and get you anyway.

 

[35:06]

 

Yuro: I think they had a similar thing with the, like Hezbollah and Hamas, didn’t they?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, there’s multiple examples.

 

But what I’m getting at is a real, and we won’t labour this because we spoke about this extensively on the Nationalist A-Team the other night, but when we were talking about that, we did make the point that fundamentally at one point the idea of going in somewhere you know, negotiating, but then using negotiations as a reason or as an excuse to then hit another country. So the negotiations aren’t real negotiations. They’re cover that gets the other side to drop their guard. So, it’s like walking up somebody in a bar saying:

 

“Look, mate, let’s just settle this amicably. Let me buy you a drink. What do you want?”

 

And when the other guy turns to have a look at the list of craft beers, you sucker punch him! You know, that’s an underhanded thing to do. Everyone would be like:

 

“Wow, that’s pretty much scandalous! We don’t want to see that kind of behaviour. That’s the kind of behaviour that’s not becoming of an honourable man.”

 

And there used to be this narrative that the West was honourable, that we were the good guys. And I’ll say these fake negotiations are being used as a means to cover up an attack which is I’m imminent. I do think that is a really shady thing to do.

 

And I think that as time goes by, we are going to see more and more people be unwilling to negotiate with the West. Like, why would Vladimir Putin or China or any other nation, North Korea, negotiate with Trump? Why would any foreign leader trust going to America or sitting in a negotiation room with the Americans when they assassinate leaders, carry out fake negotiations, use the hand of friendship to lock their opponent’s hand in place before they sucker punch them? You know, it’s like holding one hand out to shake the other guy’s hand and when he starts giving the handshake, you just sucker punch them! You know, it’s awful! I mean, what do you guys think to this?

 

I think this is going to fundamentally change the way, the implication of this, is going to change the way that every other nation does business with America. And it’ll put America on a even people like the Europeans, who are essentially vassal states of America, are not going to be trusting of Trump again or America.

 

Yuro: Well, Europe is already not going to be trusting of Trump and America because of the whole thing with Greenland for a start. But I mean, I hope at the end of this, obviously Iran’s going to hold out. They’re going to continue to resist until America and Israel, …

 

Mark Collett: This is the summation, what you hope for comes at the end, like, stay on, …

 

Yuro: It’s related to this! It’s related to this. I was going to say I hope that Israel and America run out of interceptor missiles. Iran fights them to a standstill. And they say:

 

“Right, we will negotiate with Trump in this place.”

 

He goes there to negotiate, and then, …

 

Natty: They just blow him up! [chuckling]

 

Yuro: And it would be entirely justified on moral grounds and on the grounds that it’s already been done to them.

 

Natty: They would cry bitter tears if the same tactics they had used, these same underhand, cowardly, sniveling, weak tactics were used on them! And this is something to point out to. I say I’m gonna use Boomer, but, like, Boomer mindset, Civnat, kind of Tommy Robinson-tard mindset where like:

 

“Oh, yeah, no, we’re the good guys and we should stamp these dirty terrorists into the ground! They’re terrorists!”

 

It’s like your pedo jew empire assassinates little girls for some reason, I guess because they’ve just got bloodlust and we can talk about the Purim Fest, if we want. Assassinates little girls, assassinates world leaders, which is supposed to be off the table. Totally violates, like, any notion of the Geneva Convention or the kind of rules of war and does it in a cowardly way. This is like your medieval knight marching out to the front of a battle under a white flag to negotiate terms and then just pulling a knife and stabbing the negotiator. Your entire army would be, they’re like, forfeit. And the enemy army would be totally justified in just slaughtering prisoners and like, just pillaging and doing whatever it wants at that stage! You’ve set the rules. You’re supposed to be the powerful, the one who’s setting out exactly how things are going to go down. And you open the conflict or the latest round of the conflict with an underhand cowardly assassination under the flag of truce and blowing up 170 schoolgirls! Well, I’m sorry, but what space have you now given for quarters? None! And no one’s going to trust you, and they shouldn’t trust you.

 

And the other world powers looking on Russia and China, who we’re going to touch on in a little while, like Mark said, they’re not going to be trustworthy. They’re going to have that in their minds anytime America tries to talk to them, anytime the jew empire reaches out to say:

 

“Oh, we just want to discuss the Ukraine war and negotiate terms in the Ukraine war.”

 

And like, Yuro said, they would be totally justified in shooting down like diplomatic planes, like bombing, like delegations, peace delegations, assassinating the head of state. Who’s to tell anyone now that that is a wrong or immoral thing to do now that supposedly the world police and a global superpower and the most moral army in the world, Israel, has carried out exactly that, such a thing.

 

And I don’t need to belabour the point, but they’ve been doing this for a long time. And you can look back as far as Dresden and the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan, to say:

 

“Well, that’s how these people act! And people who oppose them should act accordingly and plan accordingly.”

 

[41:35]

 

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. And not only this or not only what you guys have said, but I do think it’s very interesting that on top of everything you guys have said, there is also the issue of Russia and Zelensky.

 

Now obviously if Russia had wanted to, they could have bombed Kiev, day one of the conflict and absolutely just beheaded the regime. Now Russia never did that. Now I’m not saying Russia are the good guys or shilling for Russia, but it is an interesting comparison to see that everything that Russia has been accused of, the West has done and the West has done it in a much more sort of egregious fashion. It’s quite interesting.

 

And this so-called “Axis of Evil” now appears to be far less evil than the “good guys”. The “good guys” have shown, I said that in inverted commas. Have shown their hand. They’ve, it’s a mask off moment. I don’t know if anyone wants to add something to this because we did talk about this a lot, but I’ll give you the chance to follow up if anyone wants to talk about this.

 

Natty: Yeah, go on. Yuro, you go first.

 

Yuro: I was just gonna say it’s a complete moral inversion. It’s, we are supposedly the good guys because we fight against the bad guys. And they’re all terrorists. They’re inherently evil. I was listening to, I think this was on the Daily Shoah they were talking about basically the term “terrorist” is a social construction. It’s just a word we can use to label somebody and all of a sudden their grievances illegitimate. We don’t have to stick to the rules of engagement. We can just murder them, we can murder their families and put them in jail. We just put this label on them and they are inherently evil.

 

But you know, the Ayatollah was never in the Epstein files. That’s the difference.

 

Natty: Yeah, the Ayatollah never called me a goyim or demographically replaced my people or ethnically cleansed my people. So you know, what beef do I have with the Ayatollah, at this point? And like Mark was saying, the Russians opened Ukraine, the Ukraine conflict by striking out military targets. They were landing at Hostomel Airport and controlling like major supply routes. And the Jewpedo regime starts its war with an assassination of a leader, or a spiritual leader. Not a military strategist or anything like that. A spiritual leader who’s in his 80s as well as his granddaughter and his family members all blown up. And like blowing up a school with 12 to 17 year old school girls in it. Now you tell me, yeah, you tell me who the bad guys are.

 

Yuro: It’s worth pointing out as well that the entire war in Ukraine or although it was something that had been kind of slowly building up for a while, that NATO had been expanding further and further eastward, it was really brought to the fore because Russia was supporting Assad in Syria. And the Epstein empire had to take out Syria in order to stop Iranian weapons getting to Hezbollah and getting to Gaza.

 

And so they started this whole other conflict to take Russia’s focus away from helping their allies in Syria. And that allowed them to get in there and destroy Syria. And it’s all part of the same program.

 

Natty: The same grand strategy. Yeah, I think people, a lot of people kind of don’t seem to understand that. They’re like:

 

“Well that seems, that seems too far fetched that the Pedojew regime would start a war with Russia in Ukraine just to help topple the Syrian government. Or the Pedo jew regime would kidnap a South American president just to support an ongoing or like support a future war against Iran with oil, you know, oil routes and all the rest of it.”

 

Because people are like:

 

“No, that can’t be right, you know, 50,000 Ukrainian men dead and God knows how many Russian men dead just to tie up Russian forces to leave Syria exposed?”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how these people think. That’s what they’re willing to do.”

 

And that’s what they did do. And in Syria, Russian troops, Russian air power in Syria was halting Israeli aggression and you know, Western aggression. It was the CIA, it was MI6 and was Mossad, was paying ISIS, which has now become HTS, which is basically ISIS, to mess up Syria and mess with Assad and sanctions on Assad’s government that was turning the place inhospitable. Making it so that just to live there was pain and it wasn’t the government was obviously suffering and trying its best, but the people suffer when you put sanctions on a country. So on behest of like jewish paedophiles and Israel, America just makes people’s lives a misery around the world, everywhere! You know, Ukrainian men dead, Syrian families wiped out, little girls in Iran, hundreds of thousands of civilians everywhere, in Iraq, in Gaza, in Libya, all dead! Because jewish paedophiles just cannot get enough blood.

 

Yuro: And until the extent that they have any support for the Israeli regime in places like the UK, people in the UK who support Israel, they see this as a war against the Muslims. And they hate Muslims because of what gangs of Pakistani men do to White girls after jewish people like Peter Mandelson and his friend Tony Blair, people like that brought them to our country.

 

And it works for them both ways because it destroys the youth of the British people. It destroys our homogeneous country. It creates resentment against Muslims which they can then use and say:

 

“Well, don’t you hate the Muslims, you hate the Pakistanis who are raping children over here!”

 

[48:08]

 

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“Live vicariously as we bomb them in the Middle East. Oh, we’re getting those dirty Muslims for you know, goyim! Don’t worry, we’re bombing them. You love it, don’t you? Rah, rah, ra! Let’s go Israel! Israel’s defending you! If we weren’t fighting them here, you’d be fighting them in your streets!”

 

Well, how? Okay, thanks, Schlomo. How did they get onto my streets in the first place? Anyone fancy answer that, answering that question?

 

Mark Collett: No, that’s a very good point. Now obviously we discussed that.

 

So when we discussed the Ayatollah being killed, we’ve discussed the schoolgirls being killed. I mean, know, as you said, the paedophiles are now murdering children. And this says something about America and Israel.

 

Now, I don’t think this was an accident. I don’t think that school being hit was in any way an accident. I think they did that on purpose. I think that’s the sort of people that they are. I think they do things like this because it pleases them to do things like this. And it pleases them to do things like this because to them this is they could avoided doing this, but they don’t want to avoid doing this. What they want to do is they want to cause as much hurt and pain as possible. Now these missile systems that they have, they are probably the best missile systems in the world. They understand where they can strike and where they can’t strike. Those missiles are pretty damn accurate.

 

So when they hit a school, I think that’s by some sort of sick design. I don’t believe it’s accidental. I don’t know if you guys want to add anything to that.

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a term called “sub-metre accuracy” and I think Tomahawk missiles, I’m not sure about JDAMs, but certainly Tomahawk missiles and the types of missiles that the Jewpedo regime uses all have sub-metre accuracy.

 

So the claims about:

 

“Well, this girl school was next to a Iranian military base or something.”

 

These munitions have sub-metre accuracy, which means they can target within a metre, which is where they drop these bombs. I mean, are we supposed to pretend that the Pedojew regime is somehow like squeamish about blowing up children and civilians? A regime that goes out of its way to target hospitals and suburbs and then when it’s blown up the hospitals and suburbs, then blows up the tent cities that spring up around it to house all the refugees and injured people that you’ve just like totally displaced.

 

So these people are not squeamish about killing civilians then. They never have been. They never have been. Not for the last 70 years and probably not before that.

 

Yuro: We’re always told that we have the most advanced, precise, ultra accurate munitions. We can take out a terrorist in a crowd without killing anyone else:

 

“Oh, look, we dropped a bomb dead centre on that school. Total accident! We don’t know how it happened!”

 

Do you remember when they were attacking Gaza? I mean they’re always attacking Gaza, but in particular in the aftermath of October 7th and there were various organisations that went there to try to provide food relief and they had a car with a big logo on the top that says, “Food Kitchen”. It’s a non-governmental organisation, it’s a charity that’s bringing food to starving people in Gaza. And they sent a munition. It’s like a missile, but instead of a bomb, it’s got just like razor blades all around it.

 

And you can see the picture of the car, they sent it straight through the roof, directly on top of the driver’s seat and cut that man to bits! That’s how accurate they can be when they want to be. So they have the ability to do that they have the ability to do it. It is not an accident when they, …

 

Natty: The other interesting thing about the strike on the girls school was in the immediate aftermath, like there were shills online, there were online shills and righttoids and jews and all sorts of like scum coming out the woodwork claiming again, like they used to do in Gaza or like they have done in Gaza, that:

 

“Oh, this was an Iranian missile that kind of missed a target or misfired as they fired it out of Tehran and fell back on the girl school.”

 

Which was utterly disproved! And yet, you know, none of the people who were claiming this was like an Iranian misfire will ever be held to account or ever be made to apologise or made to like confront their lies about what this was. So the misinformation is hot and heavy.

 

But if you think, like I said, I’m going to reiterate this, if you think the Pedojew regime is squeamish about blowing up children, you’re mistaken. They’re not squeamish about blowing them up. Probably the only disappointing thing for the Pedojew regime is that these girls were blown up and didn’t have a chance to be like, sent off to Epstein’s island or something like that.

 

[53:08]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. The next thing is, this is quite interesting because it’s not the first time that Israel have admitted to bombing civilian populations. And we’ve discussed that they did it in Lebanon. They do it quite indiscriminately, they do it in Gaza.

 

But one thing’s quite interesting about these particular bombings and you guys made the point that they were bombing police stations. And I think they believe that they bombed police stations and took out government leaders and spiritual leaders, that there was going to be a revolution. And we’ve constantly heard this nonsense in the West, haven’t we? That the Iranian regime is hideously unpopular, that normal people in Iran hate the Ayatollah, they hate the government, the police, every organ of the state. I’d actually say more people in Britain hate Keir Starmer than people in Iran hate the Ayatollah.

 

But one thing that’s been very interesting is post these strikes and these indiscriminate missile attacks on schools, police stations and other sites around Tehran, we’ve seen more people out in the street supporting the Iranian government and wanting to fight back against America. I think that really underlines the fact that this idea that the Iranian people are all kept down, they have the Ayatollah’s boot on their head, this is nothing more than propaganda.

 

Natty: Oh, of course! It’s quite interesting to juxtapose it.

 

Can you imagine like a protest, or a march with hundreds of thousands of people ever coming out for any European government? I mean, the closest you got in the West was Trump, right? And that is quickly turned to ash in a lot of people’s mouths. He’s been exposed as basically just another neocon.

 

But if you put yourself in the shoes of like an Iranian, a normal Iranian citizen who’s just watched every single country where his kind of ethnic people, I know that Persians are maybe looked at differently than other people are on the Gulf states, whatever. All the other countries around him who aren’t in league with Israel have been like, brutally broken up and just left as failed states. Well, you’re going to want to cling to anything that stands up to these people and anything that resists being destroyed by them, because you know that if your government falls, that’s the end of any semblance of stability or normality you’ve got. You’re just going to have to either flee or deal with a failed state of a nation. So, of course they support it!

 

And you listen to like the BBC or Piers Morgan or some of these shows and you would think that, …

 

Mark Collett: Andrew Neil!

 

Natty: Yeah, he’s the worst! He’s a total Zio boot licker, man! I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen! [LOL] But like, you listen to these people and you’d think that every single person in Iran is just waiting, crouched behind their door, ready to rise up and take out this hugely unpopular government that everyone hates.

 

And like you said, there’s no government in Europe or anywhere in the West that is as popular with its people as the Iranian government. So take that as you will.

 

Yuro: Obviously, you know, Iran, I mean, I’m guessing, but much like most of the Middle East is awash with weapons from previous gayops and plans that we’ve had to overthrow them in the past.

 

But if you turn this around and let’s say some foreign actor blew up Parliament with every MP in it and blew up every diversity police station across the country and just dropped a bunch of weapons the chance of having a revolution would be much more likely here than it ever would be over there!

 

Natty: Yeah. And just to add on to this point, funnily enough, the strikes on Bahrain, and Bahrain’s a tiny little island nation. I mean, it used to be part of Iran. But the strikes on Bahrain look like they might actually foment a revolution because they’re kind of the Pedojew empire installed monarchy in Bahrain has lost its grip thanks to the Americans retreating and the actual people in Bahrain absolutely hate their rulers. And possibly, you know, news blackout and all the rest of it might actually foment a popular revolution in Bahrain and change governments there, [chuckling] which is supposed to be like a stronghold for the American empire and the Epstein regime and the headquarters of the Fifth Fleet, which controls the Persian Gulf or it used to control the Persian Gulf until the Pedojew regime started this war. So yeah, good one, guys. How’s it going? How’s this war going for you?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I would say that you’ve got a very good point there. And it’s a good point because we are moving on to how is this war going? Well, this is the interesting thing. Trump was elected as the guy who was going to be the President of peace and he was also elected on this America First ticket.

 

The idea that he was going to look after the average American. Now since Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, we’ve seen sort of panic buying. Oil prices have spiked. This is something that isn’t helping normal Americans who are already struggling with Trump’s idiotic tariffs.

 

And I would say, for Trump, when you actually look at, you say, how’s it going for him personally? It’s not going well domestically, but his approval ratings are at an all time low. They’re actually beneath his previous approval ratings for his first term and actually beneath Biden’s approval ratings. Now he’s getting savaged.

 

Now obviously he’s going out on TV:

 

“Oh, none of these mean anything. This is rubbish! The people love me!”

 

And I’ve spoken about this before. Post World War II don’t think any Western leader has built a cult of personality as intense as Trump has done with the MAGA movement. Trump has truly built a cult of personality where people see him as the supreme leader.

 

But I think that can be a good thing and it can be a bad thing! It’s a good thing because you have a dedicated support base. It’s a bad thing because often you become insulated and you only listen to that dedicated support base. And because you have that insulation, because you have that ring of people cheering you on and like:

 

“Up Trump! Yeah, you’re doing it right! You’re getting it right! Donald’s got it perfect! Bomb them all!”

 

You don’t actually hear the people outside of your immediate circle. And I think Trump has got this wrong. I think this is going to bring more misery on normal Americans. And I also think it could cost the Republicans the midterm.

 

[1:00:51]

 

 

Yuro: I don’t think Trump got this wrong. I think Trump did this because his handlers wanted him to do this. I mean, was it Marco Rubio who basically came out and said Israel told us they were going to attack and when they attacked, we were going to get hit in response, so we just had to join them, basically, the tail wags the dog. We had to join in. They forced our hand.

 

And of course, Trump’s all over the Epstein files. He’s part of the Epstein class. He is part of that jewish Zionist Occupied Government [ZOG]. He’s not doing it because he thinks it’s going to make him popular. He’s doing it because he is either severely compromised or that’s just his team.

 

Natty: Yeah. And to assume that Trump cares anymore, I mean, he’s not up for a third term. And if he doesn’t care, do you think the jews who are running him and the Epstein, whoever takes over from Epstein cares about Trump’s reputation or cares even less about the American people and what they want? They were just dupes who were fooled into voting for him. And you can say:

 

“Well, the 2016 Trump train.”

 

Which was a lot more based and had a lot more kind of like groundswell, Right-wing energy behind it. Well:

 

“They were tricked as well. Right?”

 

But if you fell for it again and voted for him this time, they really must despise you and just think you’re the most stupid person ever going! And it’s been proven right. I mean, Trump has now burned any credibility he’s had. This is an extremely unpopular war, but it doesn’t matter. His reputation isn’t on the line anymore, and it’s not a consideration for the people pulling his strings. They wanted this war done. Trump was their best shot of getting it done. And so they’ve got him to enact it.

 

And what we’re seeing is the fallout. And who knows where this ends? I’m sure we’re going to move on to that point. But the suffering of the American people, the suffering of European people is not any concern to these people! And you might argue that European suffering and American suffering is just a little bit of icing on their cake.

 

Yuro: This is something that they’ve wanted for decades and they’ve realised that as time’s gone on its getting less and less possible. So they’ve done it now because now is more likely than tomorrow as bad as it is and as badly as they’re doing and not winning what they want to be. If they’d waited longer, they would have had even less chance.

 

So it’s just like it’s do or die. It’s all out now because they’ve got no other choice.

 

Natty: Right. That’s what I totally agree with that.

 

And what I’m saying is the considerations that like a rational government that cared about its people would make, and there’s going to be an energy crisis, our people are going to die in this war. It’s hugely unpopular. This doesn’t benefit us in the slightest. None of that is like, none of that is in consideration. And it’s clear when you listen to people that they don’t quite understand that. And you listen to like the media class trying to justify this war and just grasping for anything.

 

Whereas like the reality, the truth, that this is purely for Israel and purely for the pedojew empire just doesn’t, it’s quite a hard pill to swallow.

 

Yuro: And as always, it’s going to affect Europe and it’s going to affect the UK so much worse than it’s going to affect America, because America has its own energy supplies.

 

Whereas, you know, Europe has been deliberately cut off from Russian energy supplies and made to not take fuel from Iran in the first place. And so Europeans are probably going to freeze this winter because of what the Americans have done or the jewish-American empire has done. Yeah.

 

Natty: Not content with cutting off via like a jewishpedo regime war with Russia. Not content with cutting off like the majority of European energy supplies. Now [chuckling] the pedojew empire now starts another war in the Gulf, which will just totally screw energy prices. And I like you guys know this, but I’m in the middle of, I’ve almost finished building my house and part of that was installing a heating system and we’ve got like a central heating system.

 

Yuro: Didn’t install a heat pump, did you?

 

Natty: We did not install a heat pump. We installed a central heating oil boiler which we needed to run up as like commissioning the system [chuckling] and like we went to fill it up the day after this started and the price of central heating oil was like 63 per litre. And the day after this thing started and Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, it went up by like 33 P per litre and it’s now at like 1 pound 33 a litre. So I know this isn’t funny because this is going to affect everyone, but it’s like these are real effects and no the people who started this war just don’t care about this. You haven’t felt this at the pumps yet, but my God, like you are going to and the whole of Europe is going to, so.

 

[1:06:19]

 

Yuro: And it will be White pensioners who freeze whilst illegal migrants can turn up the heating as much as they want in hotels and non-Whites all over will get preferential benefits and help to make sure that they’re looked after while our people suffer.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean that’s a given at this point.

 

But yeah, we’re about to be hit with this thing. I mean, unless it wraps up quickly, which is not going to happen.

 

Yuro: Even if it did wrap up tomorrow, we’d still have the price shocks. I mean this is what always happens when there’s a, like the price of oil shoots up, petrol prices shoot up, the price, …

 

Natty: Two days for it to rise. 106. Yeah, six weeks for it to creep its way back down. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: They’re very interesting points and obviously it sort of goes into what we said before about Venezuela. It puts everything into context.

 

Now one of the things that he’s really. We’re going to talk a bit about the fight back here and what Iran has done, its retaliatory strikes, but one of the most disappointing things is they talk about this Axis of Evil, but so far Russia have condemned this. I’m not sure what China have said, if anything at all, but there’s largely a wave of silence about this, isn’t there? There isn’t sort of the international, … So when Russia started their, in inverted commas. They’re not my words, but their words, “the Special Military Operation”, you know, there was this wave of condemnation from every European country about the invasion of Ukraine.

 

However, here, this so-called “Axis of Evil”, China, Russia, etc, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of pushback other than a couple of snappy press statements.

 

And I think this does tell you something about Russia and China’s ability or readiness to get involved. Now I would say China is more concerned with potentially taking Taiwan. And the knock on effects of this is, well, China will look and say:

 

“If America can take out the leadership of countries they don’t like, why can’t we do the same to Taiwan?”

 

And I think Russia is still tied up in Ukraine, which is probably by design. I think part of the issue with Ukraine was pulling Russia so deep into Ukraine that it depleted their resources in places like Syria. So regimes did fall in areas that America wanted them, America and Israel wanted them to fall.

 

But what do you think about the lack of sort of international pushback on this?

 

Yuro: It’s obvious that the Chinese and Russians are helping the Iranians in terms of intelligence gathering, satellite imagery. Supposedly the Iranian missiles use like an encrypted Chinese GPS as opposed to the American run satellites.

 

But yeah, they’re not coming out and publicly saying a lot and they could be doing a lot more kind of out in the open. And if they were really serious, the Chinese and Russians could help the Iranians develop an actual nuclear weapon to allow them to have a deterrent to defend themselves. And that could have happened, you know, within the last decade, but we don’t see them doing it.

 

Natty: Well, I made this point to mark the other day. This is where I kind of disagree with you a little bit. I think there’s only so much they can do. And Russia can’t just import a nuke into Tehran or into Iran without them asking for it. And if you’ve been paying attention, …

 

Yuro: Well, they should ask for it then!

 

Natty: Well that’s, maybe you’re right and they probably should and they probably will if they ever, if they get through this thing in one piece. But Russia has to be asked to provide that nuke. And the Ayatollah, Ayatollah Khomeini has famously had a fatwa on acquiring nuclear weapons. Which, you know, looking back to how we opened this thing puts lie to the fact that:

 

“Iran is two weeks away from having a nuke. Iran is five weeks away from having a nuke!”

 

For the last 30 years, every couple of weeks. So for one, Iran has to ask these countries for things. And I’m fairly certain that Russia is providing military assistance. You know, maybe not flashy supersonic missiles and all the rest of it, but you know it’s a short hop across the Caspian Sea for Russia to send boats and send equipment down to Tehran as much as it can. Like you said, Mark, they’re tied up in Ukraine as per the pedojew regime’s plan.

 

And like you said, Yuro. They’re using encrypted Chinese satellite data for their missiles. And I’m sure, like satellite imagery of the surrounding Gulf states and areas that Iranian like ballistic missiles and drones are hitting is provided by the Chinese.

 

So I think Russia and China understand the stakes here and understand that if Iran falls or we’re kind of at a turning point in history of the future of the Pedojew regime empire and where it stands and if it manages to pull this off and destroy Iran, then who knows what’s next? And we, I guess, we can talk about that. But for Russia and China, they probably think that actually halting the Pedojew regime here is probably a good thing to do.

 

And as much as much as they can do under the table, they’re going to do. And if it gets any hotter than that, well, who knows? But I disagree with you that they’re not helping as much as they could be.

 

Yuro: I don’t expect them to hand over a dozen nuclear weapons and say:

 

“Here you go!”

 

But why is Iran using such an antiquated air force instead of more modern Russian fighter planes, for example? Like, things like that would not be outside of the realm of possibility.

 

[1:12:38]

 

Natty: Well, because that’s not where the Iranian like, national defense has been focused. America, whatever you like to say about it, dominates the air and it always has. It has the most advanced and the most aeroplanes that it can put in the sky. You know, carrier groups all over the place, air bases all over the place. And Iran has had a long time to prepare for this. They’ve watched what’s happened around them and has decided actually our best national defense is in this missile capability and drone capability. And if Russia sent a squadron of like Su-22s or whatever the latest MIGs are, they would probably be shot down in fairly short order, which would be waste of resources.

 

So I think this idea, like I said, I think this idea that they’re not helping as much as they can is misplaced.

 

And interestingly enough, Arab Natsoc in the chat has just said Iran has a hyper fixation on self sufficiency. And he says it’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

 

And I think that’s probably correct. Like I said it’s not up to China and Russia just to unload the docks in some port somewhere. Just tons and tons of military hardware that Iran never asked for. You know, they’ve got to agree these things and they’ve got to ask for it and they’ve got to trade for it and give things away and they probably feel they don’t need to. And judging by what’s happening so far, maybe they’re right. They didn’t need it. Maybe whatever they’ve asked for, they’re utilising and anything they haven’t asked for, they don’t really need.

 

Yuro: [with a Russian accent]

 

“I’m sorry, comrade, I didn’t mean to leave that pallet of nuclear weapons. You can do what you like with them.”

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, [chuckling] I did say this in all fairness, mate, I think I did say to you it would probably, to do something like this or to create a deal of that sort you would probably actually need for the Iranian regime to fundamentally turn around and say:

 

“Look, you’re gonna have half of our country, you’re gonna have X amount of our oil production. You’re going to be able to put your own bases on our soil. You’re going to have this power over us.”

 

And then Russia or China might say:

 

“Well, this is actually worth it. Then we will put bases on your soil. This is absolutely worth it! We’re going for it. Thanks. Thanks a bunch, guys. You know, this works.”

 

But the Iranians might not actually want that they might not actually want Russia and China to have that much control over Iranian politics.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s absolutely right!

 

And if you think about it, that would turn Iran into a, like a, not exactly a vassal state, but as a, like an arm of Russia or an arm of China.

 

Whereas if they come out of this unscathed, they emerge as the regional power in the Middle East, which has much bigger implications for them and then makes them bigger on the world stage than just being an outpost of Russia or China.

 

Yuro: But they could trade on more equal terms with the North Koreans. And the North Koreans have come out and said:

 

“If they ask for a nuke, they’ll get one.”

 

Natty: Well maybe they will. I suspect the Iranian government is going to be much more looking at that idea much more favourably after this.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that is an interesting point.

 

And ultimately I’ve said this on many streams, but we are in a situation where that is the only way that you can keep America off your back. That’s the only reason North Korea didn’t fall. It’s the only reason Russia probably hasn’t been invaded or struck by the Americans. I think if Russia didn’t have nukes, undoubtedly America would have attacked them.

 

But despite them not having nukes, I will say this. I think the Iranians retaliatory strikes have been extremely impressive! But amongst those retaliatory strikes, it is noted that, because when this all started, I was thinking:

 

“Why are they bombing refineries? Why are they attacking refineries in other Arab nations? Surely that’s going to annoy potential allies. Why would they do such a thing? You know, we don’t do that, guys, because if you do, you’re going to end up being a pariah state and you know, your next door neighbours aren’t going to want to essentially work with you.”

 

And then the other day it comes out that effectively what you’re seeing here is not Iran striking these oil refineries, but the strikes on the oil refineries have been carried out by Israel!

 

So what do you think to Iran’s actual retaliation and what do you think of Israel’s rather underhanded attacks? Because, and this isn’t just theory crafting. We’ve actually seen over the last, 24 hours scores of Mossad agents being arrested around the Middle East for being involved in false flag operations in numerous Middle Eastern nations.

 

And of course, this is something that we all know happens. This is something that we all are completely aware of you know, we know that Israel is regularly involved in sort of false flag events. This is something that has happened many, many times in the past.

 

And I think it’s interesting that this is being exposed. So we’ve had the USS Liberty, [we’ve had 9/11] we’ve had bombings in the Middle East. We’ve had potential or we’ve had sort of “terror attacks” in inverted commas in numerous countries which have turned out to be the work of Israeli agents. And we’re seeing that again now.

 

So I think Iran has performed far more ably than people might have thought. Sadly, they don’t seem to be winning this. Their navy seems to be taking major hits.

 

But some of these retaliatory strikes are looking questionable, are actually the work of Israel.

 

[1:19:06]

 

 

Yuro: Well, supposedly, I mean, who’s to say that the attack on our base in Cyprus was actually carried out by Iran? Because didn’t Keir Starmer say:

 

“Oh, we won’t actually engage in hostile actions, we’ll only defend Israel with our planes!”

 

Which is, of course, kind of a schizophrenic point of view in the first place. But then all of a sudden:

 

“Oh, look, our base in Cyprus is attacked and now we can kind of get in fully without restriction.”

 

Natty: So that’s a good point. I mean, we can talk about RAF Akrotiri, but if you look at where Cyprus is on a map, any Iranian weapons, munitions, whether it’s drones or missiles or whatever, have to fly over, like directly over Israel. So there’s speculation it was like Hezbollah or possibly someone else or even maybe a, like an Israeli false flag, which is certainly possible. And who can say?

 

But it does seem like the refineries in Saudi Arabia and Qatar are Mossad operations to blow them up. With the point being to try and engage those countries on behalf of Israel to come into the war on behalf of Israel and do what they can or do more for Israel.

 

But coming back to your point, Mark, about the strikes that Iran have carried out, it’s not clear to me that they’re losing. I mean, you say it seems they’re losing. I’m not sure that’s totally true. And we spoke about this before I think a few months back on the Nationalist A-Team, where I think they’re doing much more, they’re doing a much more capable job than anyone except expected them to in the sensibility and where they’re striking.

 

So they’re hitting US bases in these Gulf oil states, you know, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And they’re forcing the Americans to retreat, which stretches their logistic lines. And like we said earlier, they may have fomented an uprising in Bahrain and they’re making these Arab states which have been paid off or controlled by Israel in some way unstable and shaky. And the Israeli installed governments and monarchs and regimes in these countries are looking incredibly shaky or shaky as you’ve just put in the chat, that you’re on shaky ground. And hitting Dubai, well, that’s just popular with everyone in the entire world. So what do you say about that?

 

Yuro: It’s kind of, it’s almost like their own kind of Samson Option, except inherently justified and not evil because they’re only going after the American bases and the people supporting the Americans and the Israelis.

 

But you know, they’ve said:

 

“If we’re attacked from here. We’re going to take this, and just kind of everything in the region, every American base.”

 

And it’s entirely justified because these countries can’t claim to be not involved:

 

“Oh yes, we’re not involved in this. We just have a base where your enemy is launching attacks on you, but we’re not involved!”

 

And then the moment Iran says:

 

“Okay, well we’re not going to attack you, we’re not going to attack your people, but we’ll take out that base.”

 

And then say Saudi Arabia:

 

“So we’re under attack, we’re being attacked.”

 

Well, no!

 

Natty: That’s American soil. That’s American soil there buddy! A totally legitimate target by anyone’s standards.

 

Yuro: I mean, it seems like Iran is taking a kind of “tank and turtle” strategy. You know, it’s like when you play a, like a strategy game and you can put a lot into units or you can just build up your base and wait for them to come to you. And it can be risky because there’s a possibility that you get overwhelmed.

 

But if you’re turtle enough you can withstand that storm and then you can turn around.

 

Mark Collett: Is Yuro the tank or the turtle? That’s the question. [chuckling]

 

Natty: Depends what he’s had to eat. [chuckling]

 

Yuro: Turtling and tanking, kind of the same thing.

 

Natty: But I think like Iran by its like geography is kind of is able to naturally turtle and the fact is that there’s so many assets that America have placed around it and like the jewpedo regime have around it. And the fact that Israel is within striking distance means it can strike effectively. And America is very powerful and has a very powerful military, but that military still has logistical concerns and still has aircraft carriers that are clogged [chuckling] with like fat Mexican sailors poo!

 

Yuro: American aircraft carriers are as full of shit as Donald Trump!

 

Natty: Well, [chuckling] yeah, agreed.

 

Mark Collett: Well that’s the thing. Look, I mean, we haven’t seen an aircraft carrier at the bottom of the Persian Gulf yet, have we? Now you might be saying:

 

“Oh well, Mark, that’s a big ask.”

 

Because Obviously, if that happened, we would actually probably see the beginning of World War III! Because at that point, I think Trump would have to put boots on the ground. It actually might be the end of him. You know, it’d be one of the other, wouldn’t it? He’d either have to put boots on the ground or it’d be the end of him. But we are yet to see an aircraft carrier effectively being scrapped.

 

Now, that doesn’t mean they’re not doing anything in retaliation, but they’re not hitting the big targets. And look, we’ve had American commentators, some of these American commentators that do these sort of big takes on these things. You hear them talking about this Axis of Resistance and saying:

 

“Oh the time will come when these hypersonic missiles are going to be putting aircraft carriers at the bottom of the Persian Gulf!”

 

We yet to see that, are we? I mean, we’re also yet to see any of these sort of hypersonic super weapons take out leading members of the Israeli government or the Israeli regime. You know, I know Yuro doesn’t like the word “regime”, which we keep using, but that is an interesting point. We haven’t seen Israel struck. Israel has been proved to be not invincible, I think it’s fair to say that. But we haven’t seen the Israeli government reeling in the same way that the Iranian government has.

 

[1:25:49]

 

Yuro: Well, there’s a couple of points to make here. First off, with regards to the aircraft carriers, the American Navy has been keeping the aircraft carriers at a much greater range than they would normally use them to attack somebody because they are scared of those missiles. And the Iranians have launched small salvos of kind of like four missiles at time at them and got them to basically back off and back off to a greater distance, which means they can do much fewer kind of bombing runs at once and they have more fuel requirements and greater maintenance on the planes. So it is diminishing America’s capability to attack.

 

There was also satellite footage, I think, from a Chinese satellite that showed a fire on one of the destroyers in one of the aircraft carriers escorts. So potentially that was hit by Iranian missiles and although not sunk, caught fire. So they’re keeping them at bay. The Americans know if they get any closer, they will be hit.

 

And with regards to the missiles that they’re firing, it seems like they’ve used a lot of their kind of crappier munitions and their older munitions, like everything they’ve been launching at the other Gulf states is short range ballistic missiles that don’t have the range to go anywhere else. So they might as well use them on these targets. And they’ve been using up these older, less advanced munitions and drones and still still getting so many interceptors wasted before they actually bring out the big guns. And we’ve seen within the past day or two they’re starting to launch these missiles. I can’t remember the name of them, but they’re like a very large cluster munition that drops about 60 different submunitions on the way down and they’re dropping those on Israel.

 

And as I said in the very beginning, we just don’t know how much is actually getting through and how much damage they’re actually doing because it’s censored and covered up.

 

Natty: Yeah, we did touch on this and like you said, like an interceptor system, like a THAAD or like a Patriot battery or whatever, costs like in the millions, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars. And they’re being used up [chuckling] like drones with lawnmower engines and like a few kilogram warheads. And Iran’s just like churning these things out, like churning them out and churning them out and they’re still intact and they’re at some point America is going to run out of interceptors.

 

And I don’t know if you saw this, but the pedojew regime in America like called its defense manufacturers, heads of its defense manufacturing industry in for like an emergency meeting to say:

 

“We need more missiles! We need more stuff like come on, make it happen!”

 

But I was listening to something earlier saying this is very well demanding that, but there’s a lot of a very expensive gear that goes into this stuff, like certain gases and certain rare earth elements and guidance systems and radio radar systems and optics and all the rest of it that has to go into this missile production.

 

Meanwhile, you know, Iran can get like a cheap [chuckling] Chinese lawnmower engine, stick it in a, like a fiberglass Shahed drone shell, put a bit of explosive on the tip of it and just launch it wherever it runs, you know, within a few hundred mile radius, which is enough to cover the Gulf states and Strait of Hormuz and all this oil production that Europe relies on and lots of other people rely on and it’s going to destabilise all these countries that surround it.

 

Yuro: There’s a psychological aspect of them just doing the drip, drip, drip, dropping wave after wave of missiles on the Israelis, that’s definitely going to be wearing the Israelis down.

 

And also let’s say they absolutely opened up and dropped every missile that they had on Tel Aviv and the surrounding areas. Well in that situation the Israelis would come out and enact the Samson Option, wouldn’t they? And just you know, destroy them with their own nuclear weapons so that obviously they’re not going to feel like they can just drop everything on them at once because they don’t want to force them into that corner where they say:

 

“All right, well we’re doomed anyway!”

 

Natty: Well the other thing to remember is for Iran, the people in Iran and the government in Iran understands this is like a fight for survival. Like I said earlier, if they lose now, if they fail in this defense of their nation, they turn into a failed state. Israel has free reign and MI6 and the CIA have free reign to just fund all sorts of horrible like disgusting groups like ISIS and like the Kurds and everyone else to come and storm their country and make it into a living hellhole, just like they’ve done with Syria and Iraq and Libya.

 

So they understand this is a fight for their survival. So they’ve got to bend their entire will to doing this. Israel and America can stop anytime and can be forced to their knees if their civilian populations demand it. You know dropping cluster munitions on Tel Aviv is like a terror tactic. Well I mean “terror” in like air quotes, right? But at some point the Israeli people, the jews in Israel were going to have had enough of air raid sirens and cluster munitions raining on their heads and could be going to demand that it ends one way or another.

 

And this is what happened in the 12 Day War. I mean if you listen to shills and like pedojew media you would think that Iran lost a 12 day war, but it was Israel who cried off, who’d taken enough punishment from everything I can see. And it’s only a matter of time. I mean if Iran can sustain what it’s doing the Iron Dome is not stopping a giant like cluster warhead that like you said drops 60 submunitions on the city in a suburb somewhere, they’re going to cry uncle and they’re going to bend the knee to Iran.

 

[1:32:14]

 

Meanwhile Iran can’t stop and it simply can’t otherwise it fails. And I’m sure almost everyone in the country understands that.

 

Yuro: This is like a boxing match where the other side controls the bell. You know, you’ve got Mike Tyson there and he’s got the bell. He chooses when the match ends. You don’t want to give it everything you’ve got and gas out too early because it might go on another five minutes.

 

So they are happy to let this draw out. And everything that the Americans and the Israelis has done has all been about, let’s go in there with the alpha strike, let’s drop as much on them as we can, let’s take out this, let’s take out that, and then we’ll just walk away and say:

 

“Mission successful, we can walk away now.”

 

And the Iranians are like:

 

“No, we’re not surrendering! We’re going to keep on fighting!”

 

Because as time continues it gets more and more in their favour. What they don’t want to do is say:

 

“Right let’s have a ceasefire!”

 

And three months, six months down the line, it starts all over again. They’re better off just continuing it now.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree with that.

 

I mean, this is, like I said, this is a long, long time in the making. This is a long term plan of Israel’s to destroy and destabilise Iran. So if there’s ever, if there’s a ceasefire, if this stops, it’s going to be back on again at some point. And in the same way that a Gaza ceasefire isn’t really a ceasefire and at some point Israel is going to move on Gaza again and try and wipe those people out. So I think the Iranians understand that. Well, hopefully they understand that.

 

So we’ll see what happens.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is interesting because they haven’t begged, have they haven’t begged and they haven’t cucked! I think they know there is no negotiations. That’s one of the big problems earlier that we talked about though. You know, when you make it so negotiation is meaningless, you essentially do put people with their backs to the wall. You know, if you’ve got a guy, you know, stood in his house with a pistol and the police are like:

 

“Look, let’s negotiate.”

 

But you know that when the police come through that door, they’re going to shoot you no matter what. At that point, what are you going to do? Is it going to be fight to the death, blaze of glory time, or is it going to be:

 

“Well, I’ll spend 12 hours negotiating only to be shot in the head anyway.”

 

At that point, you are creating an interesting sort of situation where fundamentally the American word is good for nothing! And the only answer is to fight to the death. And look, you know, without going into World War II, many, many Germans surrendered in good faith, believing that they were going to be treated like human beings, that they were going to be treated honourably, that surrendering to the Americans would be the right thing, that they would go home, that they would be treated as prisoners of war. And then they were brutalised and starved to death. I mean, surrendering to America is often, …

 

Natty: Or sent to Russia as slaves.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Natty: Even starved on the banks of the Rhine or sent to Russia as slaves. Yeah, you shouldn’t imagine that you’re going to be treated fairly if you surrender to these people. They’ve shown, as we discussed earlier, they’ve shown that they’ve got no honour. They’ve shown that they’re dishonourable people and they don’t treat civilians well. Those are the lessons that should be taken from this.

 

Yuro: They protest for their right to rape captives. When their own people have been caught on video, you know, sodomizing prisoners like Gazans that they’ve captured, they protest. And they don’t say it didn’t happen

 

Natty: Out in the street.

 

Yuro: Yeah, they said they turn out in the street to protest and say:

 

“We should be allowed to sodomize them!”

 

Is there any other country in the world where you would get that?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think one of the interesting things about Trump, and this is sort of just one of my sort of notes on this, is that Trump came in as this “art of the deal”, wanting to put world peace on the table, get America out of the foreign wars that have dogged it for some time. And essentially what we’ve actually seen is quite the opposite. Trump actually does seem to be. And this isn’t meant to be a compliment, by the way, but it probably comes off as a little bit of a compliment. But he does seem to be sort of the ultimate ZOG warlord, doesn’t he? Trump as a guy, as a mad sort of emperor stood, you know, addressing his troops does seem to be a role that he slips into far more easily and readily than the role of peacemaker.

 

Now, I’ve seen him in these interviews. I’ve seen him talking about future operations. I’ve seen the way he really does love having this power and being able to tell other nations to bow to him or else. And that’s what he’s saying, really, with Iran:

 

“You’ll do what I say or I’m going to completely raze you to the ground!”

 

Now saying that, do you think there has ever been a more philo-semitic president? And following this, do you think this will change the way Americans vote in the future?

 

[1:37:45]

 

 

Natty: I doubt it. And there may have been more philo-semitic presidents, but certainly not in our time, or I mean, our time is in a time when I’ve been a, like an adult. I think I was 12 at the time when the first Gulf War started, when Bush rolled into Iraq and dragged Blair in and dragged the rest of the British people in. But it’s hard to imagine a more philo-semitic president.

 

And I think part of the problem is. Well, maybe it’s not a problem for them, although it might turn out to be, who knows, depending on how this thing goes, is that more and more people were just nakedly seeing it as that it’s like, why, what possible reason could the American people, like the people in America have for engaging in this terminal war with Iran? What possible cause do the British people have against the people of Iran? You know, flimsy excuses like:

 

“Oh, they’re a terrorist nation and you know, they might at some point have a nuke!”

 

This just doesn’t cut it. This isn’t a reason that sensible people would launch wars against people and go on these destructive campaigns against people.

 

Yuro: Sunni Pakistanis rape children. So we need to fight against them

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“We need to fight a Shia country, a Persian Shia country!”

 

Yeah, absolute lunacy! But people, I think people genuinely understand more now. But this is just jews! This is a war for jews. It’s a war for Israel. And Trump is like deeply, deeply friends with the jewish paedophile who was the mover and shaker for the evil jewish paedophile regime. This is their guy. You know, he is their guy and he’s the guy who’s going to see this done. Not for you, not for your family, not for the American infrastructure, not for the home country and what it means for the future of America, but for Israel and for his jewish handlers. And people, I think, understand that. More and more people understand that, which is why this war is so unpopular.

 

Yuro: We see more and more people waking up to jewish power every day. And in America, I mean, you see mainstream Leftists like Ana Kasparian from the young Turks goes out and just says:

 

“The goyim are waking up! Deal with it!”

 

And that’s amazing to see and it’s a great thing! But at the end of the day there’s no one for them to vote for. The two party system in America is so entrenched, they’re not going to have that option anytime soon to actually get out of it. I mean you’re just going to have a continuation of the same thing where you have presidents get elected and have lower and lower approval ratings, but the people just won’t believe it.

 

Natty: And that’s like you said, no other choice. And I’ll remind, you know, Mark was saying that President Trump ran on like a “no foreign intervention, no foreign wars” ticket. Certainly in 2016 he did. But every president has done that and most of the prime ministers and most of the regimes in this country have run on the same kind of, “we’re not for foreign wars”!

 

And yet every time there’s a foreign war on behalf of Israel and the jews, these people snap to. And all of a sudden it’s:

 

“Well, this war is justified. And this is a terrorist regime and Syria used Sarin gas on its people and Iran is a terrorist state and Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

So these people know that foreign wars aren’t popular and you know, foreign wars within justifications, but foreign wars where there is literally no justification apart from the jews want us to do this, are extremely unpopular! And burn through the veil that these people use to hide what they do and kind of hide the levers they pull in order to get what they want.

 

Mark Collett: That’s very interesting. And I do concur. I don’t think there is anyone else to vote for. But I’m not really here to correct anyone tonight. I think everyone’s made excellent points, but you are actually wrong that it was just, 2016. There are pictures floating around that I’ve actually shared showing with Trump and Vance stood together and it’s the kind of text around them is “the peace ticket”, you know, saying:

 

“You’re voting first, you’re voting for peace!”

 

This is what they ran on this time as well. And Trump did make these huge sort of overtures to the Nobel Committee, that he wanted the Nobel Prize Peace Prize, that he was going to stop these wars, which obviously he hasn’t done.

 

Natty: I think I’m probably guilty of paying less attention to the Trump campaign in 2022, [chuckling] when it was in 2016. But, yeah, I can well believe it. And I’ve heard, I’ve seen that in headlines, quoted for the peace ticket. And Trump lambasting Obama on Twitter at the time, saying:

 

“Oh, Obama’s going to start a war in Iran because he’s such a terrible negotiator and he sucks at being a peaceful president.”

 

And it’s like, yeah so many years later, you’re the guy. You’re the guy these people have activated to get this done.

 

[1:43:07]

 

Mark Collett: Well, indeed. And the next point, because we’re sort of getting towards what do we think’s going to happen?

 

But before we do that, I think one of the interesting things about this is we’ve seen, so there are a lot of, what can I call them, “Shitbag influencers” like Tommy Robinson, Douglas Murray, Andrew Neil. I despise Andrew Neil! Fat, worthless toad! The day he has sort of a gigantic Coronary as he sat eating his sort of duck pate on his terrace in the south of France will be a good day for the world! That guy is always on the wrong side of everything. He wants to attack Iran, wanted all the Covid restrictions. I can’t remember him ever saying anything good. He is scum of the earth!

 

But on the other side, we have seen this in interesting bipartisan pushback. We’ve seen Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Ana Kasparian. There has been this mass awakening to Israel! I mean, Tucker Carlson stood in front of Turning Point USA getting a standing ovation for saying:

 

“Israel needs to get out of American politics!”

 

That is seismic. You know, he is still the biggest American political voice in terms of being an influencer. I think this is incredible!

 

Now, I was somebody that was quite happy for Trump to get in for a couple of reasons, but one of the reasons being that I believed that this would bring things to a head. I believe that the Trump regime would be the regime that accelerated things to a point where numerous people who had previously been extremely philo-semitic would end up coming out, breaking ranks, and there would be a mainstream acceptance of our points. I remember saying that, actually I was briefly invited on WarStrike, of all streams, the night of the election.

 

And I was like:

 

“Look, this isn’t a bad thing! Don’t have a cow over this basically. This is something that may well bring us certain benefits.”

 

And I think that we are sort of seeing this to a large degree now. What do you guys think about this? Because I can’t really remember the last time we’ve actually seen a such a bipartisan move against Israel. And it’s not just the ones I’ve mentioned. I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been incredible! Tucker Carlson’s leading the charge with young Right-wing males and females. Turning Point USA, which used to be absolutely ZOGged, is now a hive of like counter-semitism, if you like.

 

And on top of all of that, having the absolutely delightful and wife ready material known as Ana Kasparian.

 

Yuro: She’s absolutely perfect! [chuckling] Coming out for me!

 

Mark Collett: What? What did you say Yuro?

 

Natty: What did you say?

 

Yuro: It’s a bit brown for me.

 

Natty: Get out! Booted from this stream!

 

Mark Collett: You know what? Do you know what? Yuro’s got this thing, right, where you show any girl who’s got the mildest amount of than, and he goes into some kind of like tail spin as if like White women have never ever set foot out of the house!

 

Yuro: Are Armenians White?

 

Natty: This one is. This one certainly is!

 

Yuro: If she’s anti-semitic, she’s White! Okay.

 

Mark Collett: The question is, Yuro, are you White? [chuckling] Because the fact you’ve asked this of our lady in chief, …

 

Natty: Perfect Queen.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a perfect Queen means maybe you’re, …

 

Yuro: I’m not as big as simp as you are mate!

 

Mark Collett: Mate, there’s nothing simpy about loving Ana!

 

Natty: It’s [chuckling] a justified simpery.

 

Mark Collett: It’s justified simpery. Yeah. And so why I like Ana as well is when she gets angry, she just doesn’t hold back, does she? She’s one of those people, sometimes watching somebody get really angry, …

 

Natty: There was a clip, there was a clip of her on Piers Morgan and she was like yelling at these like jews. There were like six of them on the panel and I think they were all jews apart from her and Piers Morgan. And she’s like yelling and screaming at them because they’re trying to dissemble and you know, do what “aboutery” about the killing in Gaza and the killing kids in Iran and stuff. And she’s really letting them have it! And she’s screaming at them. There was some like Boomer in the Facebook comments, like:

 

“Oh, I tried to watch it but I couldn’t take the screeching!”

 

I just, I put underneath it, I was like:

 

“I would listen to her scream about jews in my ear all night!”

 

Mark Collett: Look, [chuckling] that is how I feel that like she has come out and when she does it? She does it! So if you’re screaming like some mad, sort of disheveled, for want of a better term, “Karen” and so you’re sort of mad because there was only, …

 

Yuro: Karen is a slur.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is, but Karen can also, you know what I mean? You get some women who’ll go crackers over like the fact there’s only seven olives in there, you know, olive pasta. And the menu shows eight or something and they throw an absolute fit over it! But the way she blows up, it’s so attractive. She’s like:

 

“Don’t give me this! You disgusting Zionist pig! You make me sick!”

 

And she’s enunciating every one of her words and she’s not holding back either. She’s like:

 

“You child killing monsters!”

 

Natty: It’s like righteous fury at the people she’s like, that’s been put up on these panel shows.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. Exactly! And when you’re watching it’s extremely attractive! It’s not sort of like I said, I know “Karen” is a bit of an anti-White slur, but it’s not Karen-esque. It’s not like an overly liberal White woman and who’s outraged because of something minor that normal people are like:

 

“Look, just pull yourself together.”

 

The way she does it, I find it to be absolutely cracking! I love it!

 

Anyway, that’s enough glazing of Ana Kasparian. I mean, look, can there ever be enough glazing about the Kasparian? That could be a two hour stream in itself!

 

[1:49:33]

 

 

Natty: It’s for Yuro, apparently. I mean, Yuro’s not on the Kasparian train here, unfortunately. Maybe we’ll have to have a word with [word unclear] after the stream.

 

Mark Collett: We have to, … You mean a beating? [chuckling]

 

Natty: You’re going to a re-education camp.

 

Mark Collett: After the show in the green room, we give him a kicking!

 

So what do you think of this bipartisan movement, though? I find it refreshing. I like it. And it’s got real gravitas. Because, look, I was on the David Duke show earlier and obviously I work with David probably more than anybody else in the world, for better or worse. And I love David! He’s a real character. He can be a bit difficult at times, but he’s a real character. But sadly, David does not have the influence he once had.

 

And I’m not saying that to sort of mock David or deride David. I’m just saying that as a statement of fact. But somebody like Ana Kasparian does have that power! She does have that gravitas, but so does Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. You know, Tucker Carlson. Absolutely massive! And you’re watching these people tear in to the Zionist cause and attack these Warhawk jews. It is very refreshing! I mean, well, for me, it is anyway. I mean, I don’t know about you guys, but I love it!

 

I mean, how does this make you feel after all the years of being in the wilderness? Look, being in the wilderness is something that. I am still very much in the wilderness, despite all my hard work over the years, despite my incredible consistency. Like, if I’m not the perfect guy, okay, not by a long, long means, I am very good at debates, but I’m not the perfect guy. I have my foibles. I screw up, …

 

Yuro: Not good at controlling your temper.

 

Mark Collett: I was gonna joke there by exploding at you!

 

Natty: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: I’m not brilliant at controlling my temper, but one thing you’ve got to say for me is that throughout all these years, I have been extremely consistent in what I’ve stood for.

 

Now, when it comes down to it, seeing these people, for me, anyway, come out and be sort of so, you know, completely anti-Israel. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen it. And it’s not just relying on, as I said, this isn’t to knock David, but it’s not just to rely on me and David Duke making the point anymore. You know, these points are being made by these more mainstream individuals who’ve got serious gravitas. And I actually like that. I think it’s something that I think is really important. Seeing Ana Kasparian and seeing all these others doing it. I think this has taken our message to a new crowd. And it’s interesting to see that there are people all over the political system who have had enough of Israel.

 

Natty: Yeah. And I think having this kind of, it’s not perfect. The things they say aren’t perfect. Right. And the problem isn’t just Israel. And I think most people get that. And this isn’t to kind of pee on your cornflakes, Mark. But even the things they’re saying do give amount of headroom for anyone who’s less sizable and less influential from them to kind of push those boundaries a little bit more. And there is further to push.

 

I mean, we shouldn’t be coming around the campfire at this stage to stretch your wilderness analogy. We should be trying to, we should still be in the wilderness telling the truth and putting the final truth to it. Because, like I said the things are saying are anti-Israel, which is like 90% of the way there, right?

 

And like I said, giving headroom for more, not extreme, that’s not the word, but for a greater and more deep understanding to come forth.

 

And I think that you are going to see from this war with Iran, you’re going to see a tranche of politicians and people emerge who are willing to say these things. And sure, amongst those people there are going to be shills and they’re going to be subversive people, but at some point it just becomes like a political football whether you support Israel and whether you’re going to do their bidding.

 

I mean, one of the disappointing things with Rupert Lowe is he hasn’t really come out against, he hasn’t made a statement against Israel, which I’m sure none of us really expect, but now would be the perfect time for someone in his position to make that leap. We haven’t seen it yet, but I think this just pushes that football a little bit further down the road. You know, pushes the can a little bit further down the road to give space for that to happen.

 

Yuro: I think every day that the Rupert Lowe goes out and doesn’t support Israel, even if he won’t explicitly say that he’s against them, obviously that’s giving us room and whatnot.

 

But another thing, sort of talking about, obviously, the goyim waking up and Trump, I think it is great that we see all these people realizing the extent of jewish power.

 

And I think Trump especially is to thank for it, because he is just so openly philo-semitic in a way that no previous president, even if they love jews as much as he does, they just wouldn’t do it so openly! You know, he goes out there and declares himself the King of Israel and he says this, that and the other. And it’s again, with the attack on Iran and the thing with Venezuela, there’s not even a pretence anymore. It’s just:

 

“We’re doing this because it’s in our interest and we’re attacking Iran because that’s what we want to do!”

 

They’re not having the pretence anymore.

 

[1:55:32]

 

Mark Collett: I don’t like to cut across people because we’ve all been pretty good at not cutting across people. But I just wanted to further your point. You know, when Trump does things which are so sort of egregious [chuckling] that you sort of wonder why he’s saying them. Like when he said:

 

“Oh the Adelsons basically bought me the White House! So whenever they want to just walk in and ask for a policy to be passed, what am I gonna do? It’s the bloody Adelsons! They gave me about half a billion. How are you gonna say no to the people who gave you half a billion? Come on, guys, let’s get things going!”

 

You’re thinking to yourself:

 

“Are you actually saying this? Are you actually saying to people, ‘look, the Adelsons bought me the White House. So then when they want a policy passing, I just bring them in and say, ‘What do you want?’ And when they say, ‘I want this.’ I just give it to them’.”

 

Most people would know which bits not to say out loud. You know, it’s like when you were a kid, your mom was like:

 

“Did you clean up the house?”

 

You’d be like:

 

“Yeah, I did!”

 

But you wouldn’t be:

 

“Well, actually, I spilt the water from the big vase, partially flooded the living room, spent ages dabbing it up, and have hid the stain under the mat!”

 

Because there’s part of it that you don’t say out loud, isn’t there? And there’s part that you say out loud. But Trump, he says it all out loud, and it becomes sort of so almost jarring to hear him say it, because for years, we’ve heard that politicians are bought, they’re sold. You know, powerful foreign forces pay for politicians to do their bidding. And here’s Trump just honestly saying:

 

“Well, that’s exactly what happens! I do it all the time! The Adelsons basically funded me, and I did everything for them. So when they want a policy, I give them!”

 

You don’t say that out loud, do you? You say:

 

“The Adelsons are an important part of what we’re hoping to do, and no one has undue influence over me, but I’m happy to hear from them.”

 

He doesn’t do any of that. There’s no beating around the bush. He basically says:

 

“Jew’s got me in. And when they want a policy passing, I give it to them!”

 

I mean, is that refreshing to hear? For me, it is, because it confirms everything that we’ve always said.

 

Natty: Yeah, he is known for slurping up the “juju come”. As someone put in the chat earlier.

 

I think the worrying thing is, or I guess it’s not worrying. I mean, it’s interesting. So there was like just this ground swell of JQ awareness, like Israel hatred after October 7th because of what Israel was doing to Gaza.

 

And then the media gets to declare:

 

“There’s a ceasefire, Gaza’s over. We can look away now. We can look away from the fact that Israel has been bombing hospitals and stuff.”

 

Because of the nature of the news cycle and everything else, people let it drop. And then this big orange slave, jew slave, Trump, comes along and starts a war with Iran, like, totally on behalf of his jewish handlers in Israel. And all of a sudden it’s like:

 

“Oh, right, my awareness is shaking again.”

 

Like:

 

“Now there’s just another thing that’s like, cannot be ignored where we have to bring out this question again to the public and try and explain why this war for Israel isn’t anything to do with jews and is secretly about Russia.”

 

Or whatever else it is. You know, so, yeah, I mean, awareness, awareness rising!

 

Mark Collett: So we pretty much wrapped up a lot of the things we were going to talk about. And we’ve already said that Israel has been proven through this not to be invincible.

 

And I think that’s one of the key things here. At one point, Israel touted the Iron Dome. It touted their invincibility. I think this has shown something that’s very interesting. It’s highlighted that America is Israel’s lapdog! But it’s also highlighted that without America, Israel couldn’t exist. And that’s important, I think, for two reasons.

 

There’s this symbolic idea of Israel being this invincible outpost in the Middle East that the Iron Dome protects and they can stand alone if necessary. I think Israel have been really undermined here, not just from a moral perspective, but from the view that they can be hurt, which is important. You know, one of the big things, if you’re ever in some kind of conflict, facing what appears to be an immovable or unstoppable enemy, to show that that enemy is, in fact, fallible and can be hurt is very important.

 

And although we’ve hardly seen Israel sink into the Mediterranean, I do think the strikes on Israel have been significant from the point of view that it has shown them to be scared, that if they don’t have the West on their side, they can’t defend themselves.

 

Yuro: Well, it’s like with October 7th. When October 7th happened, it showed the world that they’re not all powerful, they’re not all knowing, they’re not always just gonna win because they’ve got everything on lockdown. Their power does have limits. And there’s some amount of White nationalists who come out and say:

 

“Oh, no, they let that happen1 You know, they let that happen on purpose! That they have a reason to do this.”

 

But actually, it’s like you’re unwilling to believe that they just screwed up that badly.

 

[2:01:21]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m not going to get into a big debate, but I actually believe they let that happen. I believe that that was part of their plan and gave them this imperative to do what they did in Gaza.

 

However, I think Iran’s a different kettle of fish. I think that what we’re seeing with Iran here is something fundamentally much more damaging for them, because they have nothing to gain by letting Iran smash through the Iron Dome. They have nothing that they can say:

 

“Well, this gives us the moral imperative to do X.”

 

Because in the case of Iran, they’ve already done X, haven’t they? X has already been committed to, it’s already been carried out.

 

So I think there’s different things here.

 

But look, let’s wrap this up and we’re going to wrap this up before we do the questions and answers. If anyone wants to Superchat. If you’ve enjoyed the stream, please consider sending a Superchat. But we’re going to wrap this up with, obviously we’ve said this is for the Greater Israel Project and we’ve talked about the political ramifications around the world for America, for Russia, for China, for future conflicts.

 

But one thing we haven’t talked about is the political ramifications here in Britain. Now, obviously Starmer hasn’t embroiled himself and he’s made the right choice in that case, but probably for the wrong reasons. Rather than doing this because he doesn’t want to serve Israel, he’s done this because he doesn’t want to turn the Muslim bloc vote against him any further because he fears losing the next general election.

 

But what we can see here, or what I see here, is a major problem with refugees and they’re talking about potentially two, … There was the, I think it was the Telegraph that stated this. The calculation is that 2.5 million people will be displaced from the region due to this conflict. At the present time, that number could obviously rise and they’re all going to be coming to Europe, they’re not going to be going to Israel.

 

And I’ve always described this as sort of the twin evils of Israel. On one hand, Israel menaces, murders, maims, terrorizes states in the Middle East for its own gain and to maintain dominance in the region. However, the blowback is never for Israel! The blowback of all this ends up hitting Western nations who take the refugees or the people that are displaced.

 

And I think that’s the final piece of the puzzle, that the Greater Israel Project makes Israel more powerful, but by extension due to the knock on effect, it weakens the West, it pushes us closer to a demographic shift that will be unrecoverable and fundamentally takes us a step nearer to being a minority in our ancestral homelands!

 

Natty: Yeah, destabilising its immediate neighbours, like I said earlier, destabilising its immediate neighbours with missiles and bombs and gayops and all the rest of it, is a short timescale. But destabilising European countries with mass immigration and kind of ethnic cleansing and all the rest of that, that’s still just destabilisation. It’s just on a longer time scale. And I alluded to this earlier, but the Israeli gayops and the CIA and Mossad and MI6 operation, well I mean it was the open British government was just aiding like terrorists in Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi. Gaddafi had an agreement with Italy where Italy would pay him to stop, just endless floods of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. And Israel uncaring that that was in place or seeing that actually destroying that was a good thing because it helped destabilise everything, not just Europe, but top to Libya, decided to enact you know, plans against Gaddafi that ended with him, like I said, with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street.

 

And that led to the migration crisis in 2015, 2014, 2015, which is ongoing today. And I just posted in the private chat there because I just looked this up, Morgoth’s Law, which was spoken by Morgoth himself:

 

“No matter where the conflict is in the world, the refugees coming to Europe will be fighting age black and brown men!”

 

And that’s going to hold true for this conflict.

 

Now that might be coincidental in other cases but certainly with Iran this is the double, not the double edged sword but like the win-win situation for Israel. They get to destabilise nations by direct war against their like direct competitors. But they also get to destabilise their so-called “allies” in terms of European nations in America with all these displaced people who then through their human rights groups and refugee groups and these kind of NGOs get to set up migration routes into the countries who are supposedly their allies that they help destabilise. The knock on for politics in this country, unfortunately there won’t be much because we don’t have much of a choice. And if Reform was in power at the moment it would probably be just balls out gung-ho for Israel. So what choice do you have in this country? I mean it’s probably less than anywhere else.

 

Mark Collett: I will say though, I think Yuro is right in what he said. Every day that Rupert Lowe spends not endorsing Israel is a victory from our point of view. You know, I know that might sound like a cucky thing to say, but it has been so long since we’ve had anybody in any form of position of genuine power who hasn’t immediately been a slave to Israel. And it’s one of the things that Tommy Robinson’s been quite upset actually by a number of things Rupert Lowe has said and done. I don’t know if you saw, but Tommy Robinson said:

 

“You know, Rupert Lowe needs to clarify whether black people can be British. Rupert Lowe needs to clarify his position on all these things!”

 

Well, I find that very interesting because that suggests that Tommy and his handlers are getting quite nervous that Rupert isn’t going to be the Zio lap dog they hoped he would.

 

[2:07:56]

 

Natty: Yeah, the kind of the cucked civnat stuff that always bends towards this like piss-weak conservatism, as we’ve seen with Reform, where it just turns out they’re just as I mean they’re not really even civic nationalists, they’re just Conservatives in that anyone’s British, anyone who steps foot on this island is British.

 

So yeah, I mean funnily enough, Tommy wrote, those questions from Tommy Robinson he tried to put to Rupert Lowe:

 

“We’re in the wake of the Iran war starting and Rupert Lowe not coming out in support of Israel.”

 

And all of a sudden here you’ve got Tommy Robinson popping up like fresh from snorting up lines of coke on a mirror somewhere in America asking him about the same, well as pulling the same gay ops that he tried with the BNP all those years ago, which you know about very well, Mark.

 

Yuro: And after hopping off his private jet with his son, who’s posting about it on Instagram while he begs for money from poor White people who haven’t got a dime to scrape together.

 

Natty: Yeah, Tommy Robinson, just to reiterate, is absolute scum! He is scum! Everything out of Tommy Robinson’s mouth is like a jewish handler somewhere. And that has become more and more clear! There’s no like, no intersection of lines from real dissidency in this country in the West. And Tommy Robinson, this is like a literal jewish mouthpiece being paid by Israel to say the things he does.

 

And if you think there’s some part of Tommy that’s still good or some part of him that’s still worth listening to, then you simply haven’t been paying attention. And you need to, I don’t know, get with the programme or get your head right, because he’s evil, he’s terrible, and he’s a scumbag!

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

So I think we’ve had a pretty robust chat. We’re going to do the Superchats in a couple of seconds. If you want a Superchat, please do.

 

But I’ll say this, I think in conclusion. I’ve said this many times before, but the judeo-American empire is the greatest threat to the world!

 

Yuro: And I’ve said they are the great Satan!

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s not just the greatest threat, is it to White people. Now we obviously are fundamentally our thoughts are for White people. That’s the most important thing for us, that we look after people of European descent.

 

However, it’s not just people of European descent that suffer under the judeo-American State. Obviously Arabs suffer immensely.

 

And a lot of the problems created by the judeo-American States, actions such as these unnecessary wars, these toppling of sovereign regimes, the murder of government leaders in foreign countries, like Colonel Gaddafi. And look, when we say this, we’re not saying that Colonel Gaddafi is our hero or that we loved everything he did, but he was stopping millions of people passing through his country and entering Europe. And I’m sure that when he was toppled, there were many people within the Israeli regime and many leading jews in America and Europe that were very happy that there was going to be even more migrants headed to Europe.

 

And I believe that the only real way that the world can achieve freedom is for the judeo-American Empire to fall. I don’t know whether you guys agree with that. Obviously have 30 seconds each to sum up, or a minute or whatever you need.

 

Natty: That’s totally correct! And that is the line of, like I said a second ago, real dissidency, and this kind of rightoid, Right-wing, edgy conservatism. Like you said, the judeo-American Empire is the threat, is the problem! And if you’re not willing to say that, if you’re not willing to like cheer on its losses, then you’re not on the same level as you should be. I mean, you’re not where you should be. And I’m sure everyone listening to this is pretty much there, but those are the lines. There’s not a Left, Right, divide. There’s not a third Worldist, whatever it is, divide. It’s just you’re either hoping for this evil entity to fail or you’re not at this point. But, and we’re seeing, hopefully we’re seeing part of it sailing here. We’re going to see it fail more and more.

 

So that’s what I’m looking forward to. Not just that, but the visceral feeling when you, like you said, see a cluster munition raining down on Tel Aviv, feels good too. So enjoy it.

 

Yuro: White people the world over shall not be free until organised jewry is disempowered! Inshallah!

 

Mark Collett: That [chuckling] was the most concise you’ve been all night mate. Superb!

 

So, yeah, I think it’s been a very productive stream this evening.

 

And I think we’ve talked about a lot of things that people would want us to talk about. And without being boastful, I think that tonight we’ve kind of hit on more or less every major point, unless we haven’t.

 

But I think we put a lot of effort, obviously into ensuring that we did hit every major talking point tonight. And this was the, probably, I’d say the most comprehensive coverage of this particular issue that anyone will get. So I’m hoping that you guys enjoyed it. And we are going to do the Superchats now.

 

[2:13:54]

 

So thank you to everyone who has Superchatted. And if you haven’t, there is obviously still time. And remember, if you do send a financial contribution, it’s gratefully received because it’s what allows me to keep doing things like this and doing these streams.

 

Anyway, Mr. Skywalker gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“You and Red Ice were definitely correct about ZOG’s superior tactical advantage, which I never doubted. Still Iran and its proxies and have fared better than expected. Landing hits on ZOG’s military assets.”

 

And he goes on with another $3 and said:

 

“It appears ZOG is carpet bombing civilian structures in Iran now, as many military bases and missile sites are up to a thousand feet below ground, very difficult to destroy. Do you think ZOG will use ICBMs?”

 

I think we’ve said that actually that fundamentally we are seeing probably a better sort of defense than people may have initially thought. However, obviously going up against the judeo-American empire is absolutely not an easy thing to do they are doing better than we thought.

 

And interestingly, the Americans are already resorting to these horrific tactics of bombing civilian structures. Do you think Trump would go as far as using an ICBM?

 

Natty: It’s possible. You know, who knows? At every juncture where you think Trump isn’t going to do something, you know, sometimes, well, quite often he will just go ahead and do it. The problem with nukes is, one that’s a line that if you cross has real implications. If you drop a nuke on a country just because you started a war and are then subsequently losing that war,

 

Yuro: If you started a war to stop them having nukes and then when you have lost you use them!

 

Natty: Yeah, it kind of undermines, it’s a massive red line. Like I said, probably implications that none of us even can think about at this stage.

 

The second thing is, nukes, for all this talk of tactical nukes, they’re a surface weapon. You detonate them above ground. So they don’t really, in this war against Iran, they don’t really have like a tactical purpose and they would only be used to destroy, like, surface, weak, soft civilian targets, like cities. I mean, nukes are designed to be used on cities that are all like massed troop build-ups, which Iran doesn’t have. So morally it would be reprehensible and tactically it’d be stupid. Although it would just, it would literally just be against civilians. To use them in this war would be like, against civilian targets.

 

Yuro: Yeah, it wouldn’t benefit them one bit. And there’s no way that Russia and China would not respond to it. And that’s not saying that they would launch nukes themselves, but there would have to be some kind of bigger response from them. To get more actively involved.

 

Mark Collett: And I think Natty hit the real point here. The only time nukes have ever been used are on civilian targets. They are not a weapon that is used really for military sites. There’s all this talk of:

 

“Oh, well, people have got tactical nukes now, and a tactical nuke does this and the fallout’s not as great.”

 

And we’ve heard all of these sort of takes before, but fundamentally the only proven use for a nuke is to be used against a civilian target. That’s just the way it is.

 

And I personally believe that if the Americans did this and took it down that route, it would be this fundamental turning point that I’m not sure the world could recover from that you know, it’s happened obviously twice before and it was horrific what the Americans did to the Japanese. But to do it now and for America to be doing it because they started the war and it wasn’t going their way, I think the world would change in a way that we probably couldn’t actually completely understand right now! But I don’t think it will go nuclear.

 

Thank you so much for the two Superchats, though. Ruins in a Landscape gave $50. Thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. Bay of Kings gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thanks, Mark. It appears Natty’s dropped out.”

 

One of his devices has come unconnected, it says on the screen. I’m sure he’ll be back. Arab Social Nationalist gave $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thoughts on the spectacle of the Nigerian leader of the opposition, Olukemi Olufuntu Adagoki Badenok and Farage arguing that Starmer hasn’t done enough for the Yanks. There is no opposition in the British establishment. Ignore a whisper of dissent in Parliament. War for jews unites the establishment.”

 

I think this is very interesting. And obviously Badenock and Farage are looking at what got Trump to power. Now, fundamentally, Farage and Badenok are both out of power at the moment and I think they’re both kissing up to Israel as much as they can, hoping that that will be their ticket to a Trump style run at Parliament. And let’s face it, although at the moment Farage is the favourite to win the next general election, that can all change. And he is looking at sort of shoring up his position. But Kemi Badenok is looking at going into a general election where she will be decimated.

 

So it is interesting to see both Badenoch and Farage fighting to see who can be the most philo-semitic on this particular issue.

 

But I’ll say this, and this isn’t meant to be like a cold way to leave the stream, or a black pill at the end or anything of the sort. But there are still an awful lot, and I call them Boomers because they generally are from that sort of age bracket. Now, it’s not to say all Boomers are evil, but there generally is this sort of Boomer mentality of:

 

“Well, bomb them all! Get rid of the Arabs! We need to support Israel! They’re our greatest ally!”

 

And that rhetoric does still appeal to, I would say, a sizable portion of the Boomer population.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree. And because they don’t really want to think about it and the implications of it. So looks like:

 

“Oh, something else is going on. Well, to hell with them all! Just blow them all up! Bloody Arabs!”

 

And that’s a cultivated mentality. That’s not an accident that people say things like that and think things like that. This callous, cold, bloodthirsty, you know, mentality that’s been instilled in people through, I mean, basically like a real use of the term racism, where it’s:

 

“Yeah, Arabs are like dirty brown people and killing them anywhere is good!”

 

It’s like well, a normal human being, a moral human being doesn’t actually think that way. And if you’ve been led into thinking that some like, cartoon villain version of like, I don’t know, like a Western man, is ridiculous and retarded and immoral, and the people who put that idea in your head have taken a long time to do it, but have succeeded, if you come out making statements like that.

 

Yuro: And to the extent that it is a naturally occurring phenomenon, it’s as a result of having the Pakistani rape gangs that jewish people and organisations brought here and having the Sunni Wahhabi terrorists who are created by the funding of Saudi Arabia and Israel’s allies.

 

[2:22:23]

 

Natty: Oh, yeah, when Israel needed a recruiting ground for ISIS to destabilise Syria, they just used our country. And the overspill where like little girls were getting blown up in concerts or people were getting stabbed on London Bridge, that was exceptional.

 

Yuro: It’s just a bonus to them.

 

Natty: Yeah, that was just like a little side project for them.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, guys. We’ll go on to the next Superchat. It’s from Tomorrow’s Victims who gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“The vast majority of us here in Yank land do not want the stupid war. Cheers to all my UK people.”

 

Thank you so much! Some Guy 14 gave $10. Thank you so much! And he subscribed for $10. Well, that’s much appreciated. Remember, you can subscribe to me over on Entropy and Rumble, and that means you make a monthly donation.

 

And obviously on Entropy you can subscribe for any amount and Rumble is fixed, $5. But on Rumble, we’ve got a good number of subs now, a good number of followers, and if we had sort of 4 or 500 subs, that would just be phenomenal! And obviously it would really help me financially and it wouldn’t really make a massive difference to people as $5 is what, the price of a large can of Red Bull these days. But if enough people did that, it’d make a huge difference to me.

 

We also have one Superchat over on Rumble, only one tonight, and it’s from Archie P007. Thank you so much! Okay, $5. And you said:

 

“I was all in with Trump, the great awakening and all that he has sold his soul for Israeli gold. No one wins a war, only the people suffer always. Follow the money. Trump is Israel first, it seems.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, I obviously, I completely agree with that. Trump is Israel first. And Trump is someone who is absolutely committed to Israel, I think, in a way that I’m not sure we’ve ever seen before. I don’t think we’ve ever seen a president this committed to the state of Israel, which is obviously interesting in itself to say that, to say we’ve never had a president that is this committed to Israel, but he certainly is.

 

And at the moment, he is proving his loyalty to that nation to an unbelievable point! And whether this works for him in the long run or not, who knows? But I think it’s fair to say that he is risking everything for his loyalty to people who, …

 

And the interesting thing with these people is they did not support him when he was out in the wilderness. One of the interesting things with Trump is when he was saying:

 

“Look, the election was rigged.”

 

Netanyahu was actually the first foreign leader to say to Biden, to congratulate Biden on his victory. Can you remember that? I mean, Trump went mental about that at the time because he thought Netanyahu was his best friend. But it just goes to show, Trump isn’t actually. Well, he doesn’t actually have any principles whatsoever, does he? Trump is actually a guy that the Israelis can kick him, they can treat him like he’s their boy, their little dog. And when it comes down to it, he will take it time and again.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean the only difference, just to add the only difference is how open it is now. I mean, like I said earlier, the other president have probably done everything to the detriment of their own people on behalf of Israel. But Trump is just open about it and everyone gets it and everyone knows now and he’s just still ploughing ahead with it. So there’s the difference with this one.

 

Mark Collett: Anything to add Yuro?

 

Yuro: No, no, I think we’ve covered most of that already.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well look, that brings us to the end of the stream.

 

Thank you so much to everyone who has been here and obviously if you haven’t Superchatted and you’re watching this on replay, you can donate anytime you like on replay.

 

And if you do support these streams, especially these long form discussions which take a reasonable amount of time to prepare and we put a lot of effort into, please do consider sending a Superchat and we will keep doing them. Anyway guys, if you want to say good night, we’ll go around the group and then we will wrap things up.

 

[2:26:52]

 

Natty: Night guys. I have been looking at the chat and there’s been a lot of like pretty decent discussion in there. So I appreciate everyone who’s been here and you know, it’s good, it’s good getting all this down and talking about this because a lot of this stuff is beyond the kind of political divide that you see in this country between even nationalists who say things like:

 

“Oh, I don’t care about either side and they can kill each other!”

 

And that’s like the best you can hope for out of supposed Right-wingers and dissidents in this country. But I think a sober analysis and a sober talk about what it all means and what’s happening is worthwhile. So thanks to you two and thanks to the chat for turning up and I’ll see you around.

 

Yuro: Yeah, thanks for having me on. It’s been a good talk with both of you. Obviously we do get a bit of this chat going on with the A-Team, which I’m no longer going to be with because Sam’s back unless I’m a stand-in when someone’s away. But it was good to talk about this stuff. And maybe going forward I will get back into doing some sort of show again on my own. Maybe I’ll revive TASOB. Who knows?

 

Natty: Be very happy if you revived TASOB, buddy. So look forward to it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, thank you to both of you, it’s been a great chat. I just want to wrap things up by saying thank you to everybody.

 

Well, thank you first to Natty and Yuro for giving up their evenings. You know, obviously we enjoy doing this. We’re friends in real life and I think we’ve got pretty good chemistry and I think it’s been a pretty entertaining stream. I would also like to say a huge thank you to everyone who donated. Remember, you can donate at any point you wish.

 

And finally, a massive thank you to everybody who tuned in. We had really good attendance night. Lots of people tuning in, lots of people enjoying the stream and a really sort of quick, moving, interesting discussion on both the Odysee and the Rumble chat.

 

So thank you to everyone who participated.

 

Anyway, I won’t be back on Sunday. It was unlikely I’ll be back on Sunday because it was my son’s birthday this week and we’re having a little party for him on Sunday. So that will likely be something that may run on and I don’t really want to be rushing through that to do a Sunday night film review or stream. I probably just want to enjoy just a little bit of family time, which I’m sure no one begrudges me. And I will be doing that.

 

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday for Patriotic Weekly Review. Until then, thank you everybody, good night and look after yourselves.

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/16/2026 = 288)

Mark Collett
9 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to my work:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

5
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
On YT comments, I’ve noticed more people seem to be realising that Kosher Tommy’s brand of Nationalism is fraudulent & serves no purpose to British people.

14
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Like the English, the Iranians have no other country. Resistance is the only option.

11
0
Hide replies
Aspect of Divinity
5 days ago
I pray to God that the Iranian people succeed in their war against the Zionists and their Western puppets

@RonP1
9 days ago
A safe rule: Never get into bed with the Jew

10
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I have a cousin that married a Jewess. He is dead to me. I used to talk to his Mom frequently and she would complain how his wife basically ended Christmas in their family and how she’s rarely allowed to see her grandchild. I eventually told her “well what do you expect, he married a Jew”. She won’t talk to me anymore lol. My whole family is a bunch of sleepers, but that particular family is fuked. Her other son adopted a South Korean baby when he could have adopted a White baby. I’m done with that whole family.

7
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Not a good move, I guess people who are not race-conscious fall into this trap,
they probably believe ‘It’s just a religion’ and end up with an ugly contaminated baby

3
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Especially someone who marries a Jew, not much you can do there, especially once kids are involved. Even if they subconsciously start to realize their mistake, not only will they never attribute it to the spouse being a Jew, but they are caught in a bind not easily remedied. Same with White people who adopt non-White kids. Dead to me. If there was any possibility to fixing them in the past, that possibility is long gone.

2
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Imagine working out their Holo story is BS, but having to go along with it for the rest of your life because the wife is Jewish! lol

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I have my doubts my cousin would ever believe at any point that the holo story is a hoax. An old friend of my family also has a son who married a Jewess and from what I know about the 2 families, they are identical – the Jewess wears the pants, the family is Jewish to the core and Whiteness and Christianity has been stripped away. It’s pathetic.

2
0

@Theos19
6 days ago
Sounds like jgew hollywood did its work well on that family bro, sorry to hear this. There is nothing more shameful for a white man than to have a mixed breed child. Adopting another child not of your race is one of the most cucked things you can do. Raising another mans offspring with resources that should be for your own – how f-cking cucked is that. Someone else fcked your girl and put a kid in her, and you are raising their kid LOL. I was in the queue for the checkout once and I got caught staring at a man with his yellow wife (fat b-tch) and his mixed breed freakish looking son, I was with my wife and son around the same age. I couldn’t help but stare, it was like looking at a crash at the side of the road, or someone freakish you know? The cashier had to call me out and ask if she could help. After he noticed me the guy looked crestfallen and his yellow wife didn’t have any respect for him whatsoever lol.

1
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
I’m ashamed to admit that I started out as anti jihad, solely because of my job… I tried to rescue English girls from Pakistani Muslims who were mass raping torturing them, I did 20 years in my profession and saw the government as 100% anti White, anti English in every way. Mark et al helped me understand the truth!

6
0
Hide replies

@Theos19
6 days ago
Were you a social worker? I recall some of your comments on live chats over the years, harrowing stuff. Thank you for trying to stand up to evil. God will recognize his own.

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
6 days ago
Yes for 20 years! I did rescue many English girls, the youngest was age 8! The government is extremely anti White.

3
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
Purim explained…
“One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King’s minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman’s ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called “Haman’s Ears,” revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew in our midst”
JRM by Arnold Leese

6
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
The Young Turks, Anna K and all that group are not “awakening”. They are still anti-White and that will never change. While Anna does have harsh words for Jews as well as Israel, she and TYT are still anti-White libtards. Please stop blowing a load in your shorts because you think she’s hot. It is, indeed, simp behavior and quite embarrassing for us all.
She is/They are ANTI-WHITE. Got it?
Covington was right. Being pro-White is something Whites have a really hard time doing, even those that are racially conscious.

5
1
Hide replies
Judy_Izzum
8 days ago
anti-white or not, she is still the guest of honour at my hand party

4
2

@RonP1
9 days ago
Civ Nat = Kosher Nationalism

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump comes from the jewish community. He has been around them his entire life. They made his career in realestate in New York. He has belonged to them his whole adult life.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Remember: these jews bombed Qatar to kill Hamas’s chief negotiator. They’re out of control, and they cannot be negotiated with.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s not that they don’t think about it: the British establishment is actively antagonistic towards native British people; it’s not indifference, it’s active malice.

4
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Jews, Muslims, darkies in general. They all gotta go

4
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Next false flag: Nuclear attack on USA, EU country or both. Could be an EMP nuke instead of ground attack.
Lots of dissent for this war on both sides of political aisle, they need something like a “9/11” to force more Westerners to support the war. Approval is falling hard. They need a false flag event. Also would “justify” nuking Iran.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Shalom

0
5
Green
9 days ago
Excellent episode title. Spot-on. Thanks for your incredibly important work, Mark.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
THE JEW CRIES OUT IN PAIN AS HE SHITS HIMSELF AT THE BOMB SHELTER!

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
yes I know a jew was in charge of the Armenian genocide. And the fact that Armenians are Christians made it so much enjoyable for the jews.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
I like that the left woke up to the jq but make no mistake they still hate white men. And want white genocide.

1
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
The left did not “wake up to the Jewish question”. They still love and defend Jews. They do not see the Israel problem as a Jewish problem, they see it as a White Supremacy problem. I know it all sounds so contradictory and stupid, but that is what you get with a brainwashed group of people. They only oppose and support what they are told to, without thinking about it.

2
0
Prison Ships
9 days ago
The Honourable Pastor Chuck Baldwin leads +40k AntiZionist Christians out of Liberty Fellowship Montana.

3
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson drives a Bentley, all while his rightoid followers pay for his “legal fund”.

3
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
The likes are 101 and they need to be 109! Or 110, 111 etc

2
0
Edelweiß
8 days ago
Unless Judeo-Christian civilization is destroyed, the European race will die. Crush Jehovah! Hail Jupiter and give us victory!

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
We Whites must destroy the enemy race; they have relentlessly been attempted to destroy us for centuries! We Whites, of European descent must end this madness for the sake of all humanity.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
it was a bit like watching the A-Team but without the game and gay dancing tbf

2
0
Natty
9 days ago
night guys

1
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Cheers goyim \o

2
0

@RonP1
9 days ago(edited)
Remember before the 2016 election when the bell end said he would re-investigate 9/11 if he ever got into power

2
0
Ulrich22
9 days ago
most people dont have real opinion at all. they all hope that it goes away and they can forget about it like they did for the last 80 years or so.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Decades of Hollywood propaganda had a big part in it.

2
0

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Well done lads, I’ve learned a lot tonight

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
Me too, watching on replay! My friends dog is healing well, and has thoroughly enjoyed the chicken , skin and stock .

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Imagine a future Britain that has normal relations with foreign countries. It’s not asking for much.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@MarkCollett
– Starmer SAYS he’s not getting involved, but as we know from Gaza, he can assist Israel secretly. Don’t be quick to believe his public stance.

2
0

@Stryker!
9 days ago

@VesselofGrace
I may have to return to my roots. lol

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“Peace through perpetual war, goyim!”

2
0

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
No Iranian ever called me a goyim

2
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago
I don’t like this new term “Epstein regime” it takes away from “ZOG”, which is much more poignant.

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
“ZOG” deters from Jew though.

1
0
Bronze Green Oakwood
5 days ago
“I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen”
That came out of nowhere, nearly spat out my drink there.

1
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
“We tried the internet and spent years tapping to one another on keyboards, because we bought into the idea that ‘education’ was the answer, and if we could just get the truth to people, then things would change. Well, education without action isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit. We got the truth to people, all right, and it turned out to be nothing but a bunch of noise that was simply ignored, because the internet was where it stayed. Nobody ever did anything except tap on keyboards. Tapping on keyboards was no threat to them, we just let off steam and nothing changed. It is now crystal clear to any white man with two brain cells to rub together that the only thing that will make these dogs in power hear the word no is the sound of…”
Brigade

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are banking on the Americanisation of British politics, and I think they’re miscalculating.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You’re not as much in the wilderness as you think, Mark. It’s the Dissident right that has moved the mainstream to the Jewish Question.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I wouldn’t lend a jew my lighter, much less die for him. Imagine it.

1
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
His father before him was the exact same.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran, in principle, doesn’t want to be anyone’s vassal. They want mutually beneficial relationships, not to be a junior partner.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
This relationship with Russia is new. Historically, Iran didn’t have options for buying a new airforce, plus they’re fixated on developing their own capabilities.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The jew stands atop a pile of dead children and declares “AND WHAT, GOY?”

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The strength of the jew is that he is bold, and he is willing to shock the enemy with acts of depravity that are unthinkable for normal people.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
There’s no nobility in Western leadership anymore. These decrepit democracies have allowed the lowest filth of society to take power. Good men, sound men, competent men, are locked out of power.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You can’t be pro-White and drive wedges between Western countries the way Trump does. He’s a diplomatic vandal.

1
0

@why
9 days ago
lol.. its a fun song

0
1

@Germanicus
9 days ago
Purimfest 2026, that’s what I’m calling it

1
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Howdy good folk

1
0
Natty
9 days ago
howdy troops

2
1

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Lana Loktef or Anna K….choose one

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Dumb question on a channel like this. Anna K is a commie leftist no matter what her views
are on Israel and even Jews. She still believes Whites are evil. She is Anti-White! Lana, on the other hand, it 100% OUR PEOPLE. So, again, dumb question.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re White enough, for goodness sake.

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I generally like your comments, but as semite you’re non-White thus you have no place defining who is and is not “White”. That is OUR turf. Respect the boundaries (pun intended).

2
1

@why
9 days ago
jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
I LOVE JEWS

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bruh jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
wtf

0
3

@why
9 days ago
jews behind it all????

0
3

@why
9 days ago
gubbermints

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bayonet up the bum is gonna feel like a good option

0
3
Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
6
Hide replies
– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
8 days ago
Maybe not all you Jews are paedophiles, but enough are that we can make these generalizations.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
brutal

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
o/

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
maybe switch every episode between players so all can play?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
good night volks

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
14

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That seems like an age ago

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers-of-the-soul, I call them. And they are mostly evil. It’s okay to say so.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is capable of going nut and ordering a nuclear strike. He kept asking about it during his first term, apparently.

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I believe nuclear false flag first on USA, EU or bother, then they blame Iran and will nuke Iran.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
hahaha

Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
As far as the ” Greater Israel ” is concerned, Israel has every right to annexe terriories from Judea and Samaria,not because of ” biblical rights ” but because ever since Israel was created has faced constant aggressive wars from its neighbours..
When an aggresor wages a war and looses he has to pay a price.
Palestinians had many chances to create their own state yet they rejected everyone.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
“ever since Israel was created”
The creation of Israel was itself the original massive aggression which initiated all the interminable ongoing wars and unrest.
“Palestinians had many chances to create their own state”
The Zionists would never allow any viable, truly independent Palestinian state to arise. Such an option has never been on the negotiating table. The Zionist maximalists were determined to complete the ethnic cleansing of Palestine begun with the Nakba right from the beginning. Such hardliners have been openly running Israeli governments since Likud was first elected in 1977, and even before that exercised power from behind the scenes. For example, the creation of the Israeli nuclear weapon capability led by Shimon Perez at the behest of Ben Gurion; and the hardliner initiation of the 1967 Six Day War to take control of the West Bank and Golan Heights.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
So you think that when Israel was created in 1948 ,by concetration camps survivors and a few others and was attacked by 5 Arab countries ,it was able to conduct an aggressive war.Ok

Show reply
Truth hurts
9 days ago
So you guys think that if Israel is destroyed, UK and USA will be safer with the goat loving Agiadolahs, who beleive martyrdom and the 72 virgins ,being in charge of Iran’s nuclear arsenal.
That’s fine.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
The only reason Muslims pose even the slightest threat to the US or UK is because Jewish-led elites have mass imported them into the US and UK as part of their Great Replacement. The Great Replacement is the Jewish master strategy for stealing White nations from their people. It is not merely Muslims being mass imported. It is infinity non-Whites, both Muslim and non-Muslim.
Jewish supremacism is the fundamental problem, never part of the solution.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Wow .I didnt know that the Pakistanis and the Somalians are in the UK because of Israel. Thank you for letting me know.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Pakistanis and other immivaders are in the UK because of powerful British Jews and the treasonous elites like Tony Blair who are allied with them. Jewish supremacism includes but is very far from being limited to Zionism.

Hide replies
Truth hurts
7 days ago
Blair brought the Pakistanis
ok.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
7 days ago
You really are clueless about history. There were some Pakistanis in Britain before Blair but it was Blair’s New Labor government which opened the floodgates to mass non-White immigration into the UK. I recall reading an article by Keith Woods a few years ago about this. He quoted statistics.

1
0
TDOF
5 days ago
Read:
https://archive.org/details/the-death-of-fragility-2nd-edition_202507

@ゼロHope
6 days ago
1:37:25
It is far more accurate to say Trump is saying, do as a I say and i’ll shot. There is no out option for Iran. It’s like “shame they won’t come to the table” but also Unconditional surrender, and we blew up the table and the guy negotiating with us.
There is nothing to negotiate. This is like the last time we attacked Iran, Trump started with the negotiating position of, “bomb yourself.” What is there to even to discuss? Especially after killing the pope-king of shia islam. You can’t simply do that, declare victory and leave. Everything of value with in striking distance, Iran will strike. They have choice, they couldn’t surrender if they wanted to.

Kevin
6 days ago
Ben Gavir currently in hospital and his house burning. so yes, we have seen such attacks

Kevin
6 days ago
they did hit one of the carriers with a drone, but they moved them too far away. why dont you know anything about what you are trying to talk about?

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia can’t produce infinite airplanes! come on! they don’t even have enough planes for their own war

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia is helping and Russia has made many public statements, they are just not covered. before the whole thing started every day Russia was sending plane after plane of weapons to them. Russia also spoke to Trump today and seems to have warned him they won’t let the US topple the government. right after Trump started talking about backing out.

@Kubatism
8 days ago
You are probably right, but the Venezuelan stuff also points to a broader context not discussed here – the China future war. All Chinese allies: Russia (bogged down in Ukraine), Venezuela (oil), Iran (supports Russian war effort and oil) you’ve got South Africa next (the current Afrikaner emigration policy of US, Ramaphosa humiliated) you’ve got only Brazil and India left – and India won’t help China

Alice1488
8 days ago
I love listening to Mark, Natty and Yuro! Actually real information about what’s going on! I pray that Isreal is nuked!

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
ALOHA SNACKBAR

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Warren Balogh is the master of this line of thinking

@Natty

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
The Colonel’s Fried Chicken was the best

0KT0BER
9 days ago
https://rocketreach.co/orla-minihane-email_748059991

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
DIdn’t he mention Ian Wright in particular?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
In British politics, crumbs from politicians feel like a slap up meal, alas.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That agreement still has legal force in Libya, if the EU decides to keep up their part.

@vengeance
9 days ago
i dont though

@vengeance
9 days ago
dawson agrees with you mark

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I think every leader will get assassinated that are against jews. Remember that Austrian far right prime minister that was killed in a strange car crash?

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Jörg Haider, killed in a car crash in 2008 while leading the polls in elections to the Austrian parliament.
“[Haider] was Governor of Carinthia on two occasions, the long-time leader of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and later Chairman of the Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich, BZÖ), a breakaway party from the FPÖ….. Haider died in a car accident shortly after leading the BZÖ in the 2008 Austrian parliamentary elections.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s because he’s thick, Mark. It’s as simple as that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes Trump’s crass vulgarity and his lack of discretion and restraint have helped a lot.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
*more

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Lowe is a tory of the soul, and he’s on a journey. Perhaps he will do it.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
This stream is the funniest :joy:

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re not National Socialists, but they don’t need to be.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We crank anti-semites are vindicated. Years of naming them, against the protests of pearl-clutching rightoids is bearing fruit. Enjoy the compliment.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
the donmeh Turks were jews

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
i get it, shes right now though

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s like a British person working for an Indian as a servant.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
Yeah but working for people who genocided you shows a lack of self respect.

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
everyone comes from somewhere buddy

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Come on Mark an Armenian woman working for Turks? I like people with self respect.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
She wants to be careful though. Sometimes, she’s seconds from throwing Romans.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
hahaha

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
NO HE IS GREEN!!!

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
She is Armenian

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
MAGA or MIGA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tucker is a very naughty goy. He might end up having some sort of accident.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Tucker was recently denounced by Trum and kicked out of the “MAGA” movement.

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
The Iranians have developed small submarines that are essentially underwater “drones” with which they can target American ships. It’s not just missiles that are a threat to Americans.

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Had a boomer tell me yesterday: “thank g-d trump bombed Iran. My grandbabbies are safe” hhhhWuuuuut???

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
My beloved Ana. Watching her journey has been terrific.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
+his jewish mentor

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yep

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lots of Russian cargo planes delivered something to Iran

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
We don’t know because help would certainly not go through official channels. Who knows how much Russian aid actually is.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“You have the clock, but we have the time” – Some Ayatollah.

@bagelsandloxism
9 days ago
they have hypersonic Iran is an advanced country

@vengeance
9 days ago
there are no more missles. they cant be made any faster.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lawnmowers of mass destruction

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
they say 80%

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
then the party starts

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yeah they’ve used the old stock to drain the AD systems. The good stuff is yet to come, when the jews run out of American interceptors

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
I hope they wait for the interceptors to be used up first

@vengeance
9 days ago
death, death

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or Mario

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Iran has no allies only jew controlled enemies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s becoming impossible for Iranian moderates to argue against getting the nuclear bomb.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
they suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
lol russia cant do shit

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It didn’t help Syria

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Sanctions – and historic Russian reluctance to sell them jets

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
because that costs a ton of money

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I’m sure that fatwa still stands now that he’s dead.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran has this hyper-fixation on self-sufficiency. It’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
China will look at this shitshow and conclude that they’ll defeat the Americans if they attempt to stop unification with Taiwan.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
russia and the US suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
endless whataboutism

@noreplacement
9 days ago
The heat pumps are good for some things. But not homes and DHW

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Heat pumps are noisy and do not get hot enough. We have one

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Winter in Europe will get interesting

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
110%

@Natty

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
can you imagine making love to jigsaw

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
imagine the smell…

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I wonder what his reaction was when he first saw her knob?

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
yuck.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Nihil sub sōle novum, governments have been doing this since the dawn of time since the first peasant revolts.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
he needed to attack before the midterms

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is in constant touch with Laura Loomer, and he thinks that she is connected to the base and he listens to her jewish lies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Franco,

@MarkCollett
Let’s not forget Franco. He lasted till the 70s.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@utopia148800
Doing that might be the point of no return.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
it depends how much murder the government is willing to commit and I think they will just start mass killing people.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
The Peace President

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Of course, everything was done on purpose, I wouldn’t be surprised if they said that the girls read Mein Kampf.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They could topple the regime. The monarchy is despised.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Murdoch Murdoch episode with the Trump train lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
LOL!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Andrew Neill looks like a clump of haemorrhoids

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
gross

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
HAHAHAHAHA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They think they can make the state collapse, which means that they refuse to believe that Iran is a real, capable country. This tendency to underestimate and insult the enemy could be their undoing. They did the same with Yemen. They couldn’t understand the resilience of the Yemenis.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
shows the power of PR and sticking to the script

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they wanted to hit the girls school

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
yes!

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@why
who is that aimed at?

Natty
9 days ago

@why
do we?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
I don’t know it’s all the same fake terrorist org working for israel

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We’ve been assured they do “surgical strikes” for decades. Either they can, or they can’t – or they won’t. It’s clearly deliberate.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
“Iran military says Strait of Hormuz remains open, but any US, Israeli ship will be targeted” lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
9 days ago
yet you support faggots who want to blame women and hitler — like keith woods and nativist

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
isis k

@utopia148800

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
You guys remember when a jew was screaming at a Russia Today reporter that Russia will pay for supporting Iran than a few months later a giant ISIS terrorist attack was launched at a Russian Mall?

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they did the legal games with the German soldiers after the war, too. Instead of POW, called them Disarmed Enemy Forces. To circumvent the Geneva conventions.

0KT0BER
9 days ago
Terror Cimbricus

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I don’t think America actually has allies, but I think you hinted at that

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
always, because America is controlled by jews so they essentially act as jews.

@teja
9 days ago
Trump Judenknecht!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes America does betray its “allies”.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
no people just have short memories, When Bush senior told the Shias to rebel against Saddam and America will help them than when they revolted Saddam brutally massacred them and America refused to help.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
I’m waiting for the sequel to USS Liberty

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Right.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It’s obvious now why Trump kidnapped and took over Venezuala. Oil

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump, with his bad-faith fake negotiations has changed America’s international standing forever. Who on earth would do a deal with them now? He’s a diplomatic arsonist. Look what he’s done to Canada.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein clique works too

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
They are using the term regime since Saddam

@why
9 days ago
what are we talking about guys?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
And I imagine there no advisors around Trump who are willing to tell him things he doesn’t want to hear.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump hates nuance, and complexity, and he wants reality to match his simplistic hopes. He wants this to be easy, and he cannot accept that it isn’t easy at all.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or, or, jews being stoned.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
hahah jews don’t think so. That’s why they had Sam Hyde fired.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re targeting the organs of the state: police stations, hospitals, etc.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Every Single Time

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Yes, it’s amazing how they managed to conquer all those countries one by one.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are the government. The capital is theirs, and they act as the state.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I mean what do you except? Tommy is an ex convict and a petty criminal and fraudster. And He claims he is jewish.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
he went full jew slave. Bet he is circumcised too like a good slave.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Trump went full retard

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Hi Chief. I understand why people follow Tommy Robinson, jews are putting tens of millions of Pounds behind him and he has a large organization and social media boost. Essentially he has hundreds of liars on the payroll.

Chief Moody
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
That is true. lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Tommy’s been on a coke bender since October 7. I’m not sure he’s slept for three years.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Roosevelt imploring him to use nuclear weapons against Germany but the letter sat on Roosevelt’s desk because Roosevelt has died overnight.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Andinia Plan

Chief Moody
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson and co have been very ghoulish over Iran. How people still support them, I’ll never understand.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Israelis are colonising Patagonia right now.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Japan had already offered surrender 3 times. They still nuked ’em

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real, Natty. Israeli journalists are happy to talk about it.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real. They talk about it in Hebrew media.

Chief Moody
9 days ago
It’s very blatant what Israel are doing with Iran. It’s shameless at this point.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being desribed as America’s streetwalker is like getting pimped out by a literal whore

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Well that actually happens once an opportunistic whore ages – she becomes a pimp.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Well, there is no planning for this war. The war aims change hour to hour, and Iraq was extremely well-organised.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It’s always demoralizing to see conservative patriots in America viewing our country’s greatest ambition as being Israel’s bitch

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Yeah they just don’t care. What will the goyim do? Nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“The Dossier”. At least they had that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Farage has been absolutely hysterical over this. “We have angered the Americans!”

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
9-11 made the anti-war position more difficult back then.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Not me. The state of most young fatties, they won’t even make it to a hospice

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Has anyone else seen Asmongolds blatant warmongering?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Once the Bush administration got away with lying about Sadam and terrorism ties and a complete fabrication of weapons of mass destruction, it was GAME OVER for government accountability.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers using their final breaths to comment from their hospice beds.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Plenty of young folk think that way too sadly

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
100%. GenX is largely Boomer 2.0

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Bahraini government is illegitimate, and delusional. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government falls during this conflict. The Bahraini people stand with Iran, by and large.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
There was a Yemeni calling in to a Bahrain TV show and the Bahrain TV host said there is no war in Bahrain

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Bibi WhataYahoo

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Netanyahu has such contempt for the goyim. The fact that he thinks Americans are stupid is becoming very obvious. A rational person wouldn’t buy a used car from him.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
The israelis and the the jew controlled countries hiding a damage.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@utopia148800
that’s what I meant ha ha

MarcoEire
9 days ago
All true, I wish we weren’t inundated with ai slop of Tel Aviv

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
jews and degenerates; European America is in the past.

Natty
9 days ago

@noreplacement
it only looks that way

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
The absolute state of the USA…

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Winged Lawnmowers from Hell

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I just want to see Tel Aviv flattened.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It is difficult to find any Iranian fight back video. It all looks one way success for the Epstein coalition

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The UAE is cracking down on videos; Bahrain has banned street gatherings; the jews are cracking down on footage of Tel Aviv. The true extent of this madness won’t be cleat until the dust – or sand – settles.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s hard to be circumspect, but it’s best to be cautious and not get one’s hopes up.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
haha you do it than.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Yuro needs a wedgie tbh

MarcoEire
9 days ago
PURIM FEST 26

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Evening volks!

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Excellent Germanicus

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s karma for Mark being very mean to Sam last stream!

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Greetings fellow Social Nationalists

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
\o

Esau rising
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
o/

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Natty

Natty
9 days ago
thats good lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Greetings war-weary goyim.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein regime

@vengeance
9 days ago
o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, please tell me that it’s not fucked! Chat, are we cooked? Are we good or?

 

Blair Cottrell: Give us some feedback, guys. How are we coming through? Are we loud and clear? Are we glitchy? Give us some feedback.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let us know if you good. Are we cooked?

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently we’re all good, man!

 

Joel Davis: Put a TND in the chat if it sounds good. If I see at least 10 TNDs, then I’ll know that we’re good to go. Okay, I’m seeing the TND’s flying. Okay. I don’t know what happened there. It was like something.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does TND mean? What’s TND?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, don’t even., … Yeah, right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Totally Nice Day. It’s a totally nice day for The Joel and Blair Show. And we are here to discuss what has been another interesting week in politics.

 

Finally, a story that we can discuss on the show in which we’re not actually personally involved. The Charlie Kirk assassination! There’s a lot of interesting aspects to this, a lot to break down and we’re going to talk about that. It is the 14th of September [2025]. Apologies to the audience for the weird tech issue. It wasn’t my fucking fault though! Streamyard, what are you doing? You know, I pay my Stream Yard subscription and this is it. But I guess, that’s what happens, like sometimes shit just glitches out. It is what it is.

 

But yeah, Blair, I guess there’s a lot of dimensions to this on the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we can get into, I think a bit later, like the theories around the shooter and all the rest of it. But the official story, it is quite blatantly clear what the FBI is saying and what has been released, the media, is that this is an Antifa tranny fucker who has shot Charlie Kirk in a political assassination.

 

And the way that I interpret this, and I think the take home message from this, taking it at face value for the broader public, is this Charlie Kirk, his whole thing was that he was the “debate me bro” conservative. He had like, he was literally shot under his banner above his head said, “Prove me wrong”. Charlie Kirk would go to college campuses around America and he would openly debate anyone and everyone on his views. And he’s a very kind of personable, true, chill, friendly kind of guy. He’s not particularly militant, quite moderate in his views, although lately he’d been saying things that are a little bit more edgy or controversial, but nevertheless pretty moderate by the standards of the conservative movement. Kind of smack bang in the centre of where the conservative movement is at. And he was shot in the neck for it. It doesn’t matter how much you try to present yourself as a upstanding, reasonable conservative in a suit and tie and impress upon your political opposition that you’re not one of those Nazis, you’re not one of those fascists, to the Left we’re all fascists! And they want us all dead!

 

And what this signifies to me, because liberalism is based on this premise of what Schmitt* calls like “discussionism”, this idea that you’re going to have this gentleman’s agreement, which is basically what the Constitution is and what liberal, democratic norms are we going to have freedom of speech, you’re going to have elections. We’re going to have this peaceful and open and amicable debate within society where we’re all part of the same national family, national community, but we’re going to have a good faith debate and discussion and competition in the free, an open marketplace of ideas and through the political process that everyone’s allowed to participate in, apparently to determine which direction the government is going to go and what direction policy is going to go. And that’s kind of how it’s solved, right?

 

[* The Schmittian friend-enemy concept, articulated by Carl Schmitt in his work “The Concept of the Political,” posits that the essence of politics is defined by the distinction between friends and enemies. This framework suggests that political actions and identities are fundamentally shaped by conflicts and antagonisms, emphasising that politics arises when these distinctions become pronounced. Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) was a conservative German legal, constitutional, and political theorist. Schmitt is often considered to be one of the most important critics of liberalism, Parliamentary democracy, and liberal cosmopolitanism. But the value and significance of Schmitt’s work is subject to controversy, mainly due to his intellectual support for and active involvement with National Socialism.]

 

And so it’s built on this gentleman’s agreement between the Left and the Right that they won’t resort to violence, that they won’t break the contract. This gentleman’s agreement has been utterly trashed by the Left. The Left has no respect for it. You know, for decades upon decades, the predominance of political violence has come from the Left, but also they’re trying to the predominance of the attacks upon freedom of speech have come from the Left. They’re trying to put us in jail, literally, for expressing nationalist views here in Australia. They’re doing it in the United States to a lesser extent because the First Amendment.

 

But all across Europe, the Hate Speech laws are even worse than Australia, basically, across Western Europe. The Left have basically taken over media, taken over educational institutions, are trying to propagate their ideology through bureaucratic authoritarian means upon the next generation, criminalise dissent and ultimately kill people for even moderate forms of dissent. They’ve pushed the Overton Window so far-Left that to them, even a moderate conservative is an evil fascist Nazi that deserves to be shot just for existing in public and brutally executed in front of the whole world and his wife and children.

 

And so what this needs to be for the Right is a reality check that this conservative, Right liberal premise that we can somehow debate the Left and sit down and have a gentlemanly exchange of ideas and gentlemanly competition for political power, and that we can ultimately share a political process and a country with organised Leftism. I think it should be a reality check that this is a total delusion. If the Left are going to shoot you and call you a fascist anyway, you might as well become one.

 

[06:25]

 

What is fascism? Fascism is basically more or less seizing control of the state and locking the Left out of the political process, saying:

 

“All right, we’re not going to play this fucking game anymore. If it’s either your dictatorship or ours. If we’re going to have a Left-wing authoritarianism or Right-wing authoritarianism, well, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism. We’re going to be the ones running the state, and we’re going to put all your leadership in jail and we’re going to criminalise your political ideology and we’re just going to just basically take control and assert our vision for the country!”

 

And that’s what the Right needs to come to terms with, is that this illusion of liberal democracy needs to come to an end. And it’s time to pick a side. And they call people like myself, like yourself, extremists. But all we are is ahead of the curve. All we did was just kind of like think through to the logical conclusion, to the realisation that sharing a political process with the Left is ultimately untenable, on a long enough timeline, eventually it’ll become impossible to do so, and then eventually a decision will have to be made. Are we going to have a Left-wing or Right-wing dictatorship? A Left-wing or Right-wing authoritarianism? And we need to choose very firmly Right-wing authoritarianism.

 

And if conservatives keep clinging to these liberal, democratic ideals that are based on faulty premises and ultimately are just capitulation to an assertive authoritarian Left that wants us all dead for opposing them in the political arena, then ultimately conservatism is just a suicide pact! Ultimately conservatism is going out there with a friendly face, trying to shake hands and be amicable with an enemy that’s just going to pull a gun out and shoot you in the face and execute you. So what is conservatism then? Just a suicidal cowardice! It doesn’t make any sense anymore.

 

The fact that Charlie Kirk would be executed like this in front of the whole world should be this reality check. And I think a lot of conservatives have been very radicalised by the experience. Not just seeing the execution, but seeing the reaction of Leftists online, of Left-wing media justifying and even celebrating what transpired and realizing that this isn’t just a difference in ideas. This is actually an existential struggle between two fundamentally incompatible worldviews. And so that’s how I think we should look at it, and that’s how I think we should frame it to conservatives.

 

This isn’t particularly radicalising to people that are already on the far-Right, that are already on our side, because we expect this kind of thing. It doesn’t surprise us. But it has been shocking to conservatives, and it should shock them into realizing that rather than punching Right and complaining about how we’re bad optics and making them look mean. But they need to get me. And they need to start working with us and deploying us. The same organisation that executed Charlie Kirk was the organisation that Tom Sewell is currently in jail for fighting a few weeks ago. It’s the same organisation. These anti-fascists, they don’t care if you’re really fascist or not. They’re coming for everyone. And the only solution to that is to actually get fascist and fight back!

 

So that’s my primary take. But I’ll throw the floor to you, Blair, because I know you have a lot of thoughts and feelings on the matter.

 

Blair Cottrell: It sounds to me, Joel Davis, like you haven’t acknowledged your guilt yet! Don’t you know that White people throughout all of history have trampled the world and created suffering, have enslaved people, have colonised nations! All historical suffering is our fault! And we need to suffer now to pay for all of that. We don’t deserve any rights. We don’t deserve any dignity. White people deserve no freedom. What happened to Charlie Kirk, it’s deserved. We all deserve that because we’re the evil capitalist race, the ruling class. Down with us! Acknowledge your guilt! [chuckling]

 

That’s literally what some people believe, isn’t it? And that’s the ideology which motivated Charlie Kirk’s assassin. I don’t even like to use the term “assassin”. It’s too cool. You know what I mean? Like, he’s just a murderer. He’s a coward, rat murderer!

 

This happened while I was streaming with Mark Collett. I got up early in the morning, started streaming. About halfway through, we heard the news that Charlie Kirk had been shot. And my first question to Mark is:

 

“Who’s Charlie Kirk? I’m just a humble Australian down here.”

 

And when he explained that he’s that guy who sits at university and debates people, I’m like:

 

“I know that guy!”

 

And I discovered that a lot of people I know who aren’t even that political, not only knew Charlie Kirk, knew who he was, but they watched him quite frequently and they were really devastated! They were shocked and sickened by what happened to him. Especially being able to actually watch the shooting over and over again! Clips of him bleeding out from the neck like that. That was absolutely brutal, man! Brutal! What a coward! The person who shot him from a distance. The one guy who was willing to just sit there and open dialogue, you know, And I’m seeing all across the Internet, Leftists trying to justify and celebrate this open murder, this cowardly, pathetic murder of a moderate conservative debater. You know what they’re saying? They’re saying:

 

“He wasn’t even that moderate. He said ‘mean things’ about black people on this occasion, and he said mean things about women on this occasion, and he also said some mean things about transvestites on this other occasion. And so that’s why he was shot! He wasn’t a moderate at all!”

 

So that’s subjective. First of all, that you believe something he said was nasty for some reason. But would that justifies the man getting shot in the neck? Of course it doesn’t. It’s just a disgusting, …

 

[12:32]

 

We’re up. We’re up against a vicious enemy! An enemy that, as I outlined in the beginning of my statement, with a bit of sarcasm, actually believes that White people are to blame for all historical suffering and need to be crushed under heel! Need to be punished in every way thinkable for their for the sins of their ancestors! Not only do these people serve as politicians, judges, police officers, Professors in the universities, but they are teaching the next generation, hoodwinking the minds of young people.

 

I mean, did you see that guy? There was a guy who walked through some American universities after Kirk’s killing and was just asking students what they thought about Kirk’s assassination. And they all thought it was good. They’re all saying:

 

“Yeah, I don’t really care. He was a bad person. He said mean things, didn’t like his opinion. So good, I’m glad!”

 

Basically, is what they were saying. Look, I’m very angry about it in my heart, because I have empathy. I’m not a Leftist psychopath! I can actually put myself in somebody else’s position and imagine what they’re going through, what they’re thinking. And I don’t just dehumanise people as “Nazi fascist racists”. Like, to me, Charlie Kirk was a person. I don’t even know what he stood for necessarily, because I never watched him that much, but I knew that he was willing to debate with people. He was willing to talk it, talk it out. And it just sickens me that we live in a system which brands people as villains and tries to justify their public execution. They’re just cowardly murder for the sake of this White guilt, White people must be punished sort of ideology, because that’s what’s motivating it, as I said.

 

Look, one thought I had on it, which I’ll wrap up my point with, is governments around the world, Western governments, they’ve been both occupied and tricked! They’re tricked into chasing a decoy enemy. They’ve made an enemy out of the far-Right, the extremist threat of the so-called “far-Right”, while far-Left anti-fascists, one of them at least, just shot someone in public, shot him in the neck, executed him because he was far-Right. So the same people the government are chasing are victims of that kind of terrorism.

 

And do you know any anti-fascists, anyone watching this? Do you know any far-Left anti-fascists that are banned from entering certain countries, raided by police on no evidence, taken to court for speech crimes, on government watch lists as potential national security threats? I know plenty of people on the far-Right, the so-called “far-Right”, the class of heinous villain that we apparently belong to. I know plenty of people on our side of politics who fall into all of those categories and suffer those kind of limitations on their existence. Don’t know anyone, don’t know any anti-fascists that experience any of that.

 

So I do believe that through clever language, pressure and subversive ideological tactics, far-Left anti-fascists have hoodwinked western governments, occupied and hoodwinked Leftist governments. So state resources are now spread out and wasted on so-called far-Right extremism, which is not only not a threat to society, it’s the solution to all of society’s problems! Probably why governments have been hoodwinked into chasing it as the primary threat by the people who actually are the primary threat to society.

 

I won’t say anything else about that for now unless something else occurs to me. But thanks for joining us tonight guys. It’s been an absolute hectic week or two with the arrest of Tom Sewell, the August 31st rallies in Australia, everything that transpired after that during and after, and then the Charlie Kirk shooting. God, isn’t it just going crazy? It really, it feels like everything is just spiraling into absolute chaos! The Australian government is actually using both the August 31st rallies and Charlie Kirk’s shooting as justification for pushing through a social media ban. They’re saying it’s just for young people at first. That’s how they’ll get it over the line, right?:

 

“Oh, we’re just trying to protect young people. We don’t want young people to see so-called far-Right extremism and political assassinations. And so we’re going to censor the Internet for that reason.”

 

That’s what they’re saying. So just for people under 16. How are they going to tell who’s under 16 and who’s not? Obviously that’s going to create the framework for them to censor the entire Internet or to do their best to block certain websites or content from being accessed by Australian citizens.

 

So the response of the Australian government to people organically rallying to challenge government immigration policy and to a moderate conservative debater being executed in cowardly, sickening fashion by an anti-fascist activist, the response of the Australian government to that is to create a censorship programme to stop us communicating and seeing stuff like that and talking about it on the Internet! To hide that reality! That the fact that is happening to hide that from the Australian people. Which yeah, is just as sickening as the shooting itself in my opinion. But I have more on this. You chime in first and then I’ll continue with what I’ve got to say next.

 

[18:04]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s interesting. I looked at Charlie Kirk’s Twitter and the last tweets that he made were actually about that, what was in America, but she, I think she was an immigrant from Ukraine that had moved to America recently who was stabbed in the neck by that nigger on the train in the US. And that video went very viral because it was just so shocking that she just like sat down on the train, was on her phone and then a nigger was sitting behind her and just decided:

 

“I’m just going to stab this White bitch in the neck and kill her!”

 

And there was four or five black people that were on the train in the seats surrounding it, that looked at it and then just like looked back like they didn’t care while she like bled out to death in front of them. And the black dude walks off like:

 

“I got the White bitch!”

 

You know, it was like an obvious racial hate crime.

 

And the response of non-Whites was not to acknowledge that there’s a problem with anti-White hatred or anything like that. Their response was to say:

 

“Oh you see, like the Right is just trying to like use this to further its agenda of hating blacks.”

 

And then this happened to Charlie Kirk. And the reason why that anti-fascist shot him was probably because Charlie Kirk has made some moderately pro-White takes. Apparently he was fucking a tranny. He had a tranny, well, really boyfriend, but he probably would have called it his “girlfriend” because he’s mentally ill. A mentally ill faggot!

 

But anyway, some of Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric on transgenderism might have motivated it as well. But obviously the fact that Charlie Kirk has said even very moderate, vague, pro-White things like:

 

“That you should be proud to be White, Whiteness is great!”

 

Or things like that, was enough to be classified as a Nazi and therefore deemed worthy of extermination. Brutal execution by the Left! And this has been celebrated by mainstream politicians, mainstream journalists, pundits on the Left. The prevailing sentiment on the political Left is that anyone who says anything even vaguely pro-White deserves to die. And even anyone who says anything vaguely critical of transgenderism deserves to die apparently.

 

We can’t share a political process with these people. We can’t share a country with these people. The most charitable thing that we could do is seize control of the state, implement some kind of dictatorial regime that is able to purge Leftists from every major institution, universities, media, education in general, bureaucracies, what have you, to identify basically the key perpetrators and funders and so on, and neutralise them. And then basically put all of their followers and supporters in massive re-education camps and through massive re-education programs to basically disinfect their mind from this extremist, insane, genocidal ideology against our race. That’s what has happened. Like millions and millions and millions of Whites have been basically brainwashed into a genocidal ideology against their own race!

 

And also tens of millions of immigrants, non-White immigrants, have been brought into our country have also had this genocidal ideology propagated amongst them, and they feed into it and believe in it as well. This is not something that we can just have a discussion, or a debate about. This is not something that we can just have maybe one election cycle, they win, maybe one election cycle, we win. Something radical and totalizing and final needs to be done!

 

And you might say:

 

“Well, that sounds a bit extreme. And I like liberal democracy because my free speech and all this kind of stuff.”

 

Well, you know what, they’re the people that are trying to destroy free speech. They’ve already given up on liberal democracy. You can’t force them to play fair with us. They’ve decided already they don’t want to play fair.

 

So now we have to play for keeps! We can’t play fair with the Left anymore. Right. Maybe 100 years ago in places like in Australia or whatever, you had a more moderate Left-wing that wasn’t genocidal against our race and it was just disputes over economic policy and things like that. And we could have a liberal democracy and it could be relatively stable. We don’t live in that society anymore! We live in a society now where the entire political ideology wants us dead! So it’s just like it’s no longer a tenable solution.

 

A lot of people talked about how all in the Middle East, maybe it was an unwise decision to take out certain dictators because if you give democracy to these Middle Eastern countries then radical Islamists just end up like taking over the government and creating an even worse situation than what previously existed underneath the strongman dictator that kept that population in line. We said:

 

“Oh, that’s what it’s like in the Middle East. They’re not like Westerners.”

 

And it’s, well, it’s becoming like that in the West now. Things have gotten so bad and our enemies have become so extreme that only a strongman dictator can actually solve this. We don’t have the ability to solve it the nice way. You can keep generating, you know, infinite guys in suits that are well spoken that are going to go and debate topics in public and win debates and convince millions of people that White people shouldn’t hate themselves and we should have common sense, immigration Reform or whatever, it doesn’t matter! Antifa is going to show up and try and beat them up or kill them.

 

The Left-wing institutional bureaucracy is going to try and change as many laws as possible to put these people in jail. The enemy is going to try and get our kids in through the educational institutions and, or into their Discord servers or whatever and then infect them with this extremist genocidal ideology, and then deploy them to start committing acts of terrorism like we saw the other day. That’s what’s happening!

 

[24:58]

 

And I’ve seen the conspiracy theories advanced by some people that actually the Mossad killed Charlie Kirk. And this is just like they’re just blaming it on Antifa as like a front or something. But they killed Charlie Kirk because he started moderating too much on Israel.

 

And Charlie Kirk was an Israel shill. Charlie Kirk’s whole career was funded into existence by Israel, basically like Turning Point USA was basically a front of the Israeli government. That’s why he was able to become so successful and prominent in the first place. And in recent months he has been moderating his position somewhat on Israel and people said that’s why Israel took him out, because “they made him, they’ll break” him kind of thing. And it was like a warning to all other shills for Israel that if they step off, step outside of the bounds of what they deem acceptable, they’re next kind of thing. To kind of have a chilling effect on this kind of tendency. We’re seeing particularly on the American Right, but we’re seeing it here in Australia as well for there to be conservative opposition or Right-wing nationalist opposition to Israel becoming increasingly prominent.

 

But I haven’t seen any evidence to support that when it comes to the actual shooting. Like there’s like circumstantial evidence. Like, that Harrison Smith guy from Infowars, like a month before the shooting tweeted out something like:

 

“Charlie Kirk is afraid that Israel will kill him if he goes against them.”

 

There’s like little bits of circumstantial evidence, but there’s no evidence about the actual shooting itself that I’ve seen.

 

Now I’m an open minded guy. I know that Mossad commits shootings. If evidence ends up coming out. You know, if there was some other, if the official story doesn’t check out, if there’s actually an alternative theory and evidence can be presented, then we can look at that and we can revise our take on the subject.

 

But as of right now, I haven’t seen that. So as of right now I’m just going to take the official story at face value because it is entirely plausible that some fucking Antifa lunatic would do something like this. We’ve seen incredible amounts of political violence from the far-Left. And the far-Left all collectively celebrated it and justified it. So they’re still culpable.

 

So insofar as that’s the official story, let’s hold the far-Left accountable because that’s what the official stories seem to support, until we have reason to believe otherwise. Like we as nationalists, yes, Israel is an enemy of ours. So is Antifa! You know, whenever we try and do a political demonstration, or a political activity, Antifa come down and try and engage in violence against us. They engaged in organised violence against the March for Australia rally a few weeks ago. They’ve firebombed Tim Lutz’s house, one of our friends and associates, the Victorian leader of our organisation. And the list goes on! Antifa, always trying to dox our activists, attack our activists. And they’ve embedded themselves in Australian media all over the place to carry out their designs. So if the official story is Antifa’s responsible, I’m going to hold them responsible because Antifa are fucked! They want me dead! They want Blair dead, they want all of you dead that watch this show and sympathize with what we’re doing.

 

So that’s what I have to say about the Mossad theory. I entertained it when the shooting first happened. Like there’s some, okay, let’s explore it, but I haven’t seen good evidence for it. What I have seen good evidence for is that this guy did it. People said:

 

“Oh, it was a professional hit.”

 

Well, looking at the evidence, it was actually only a 200 yard shot. If it was a professional shot., … It wasn’t even the best shot. Because it hit him in the neck, but it kind of ricocheted off the top of, … It looked like he was wearing some kind of bulletproof vest or body armour of some description. And it seemed like it hit him around the collarbone or just below the collarbone area and then ricocheted up into the neck. Obviously he wasn’t aiming for the neck. He probably didn’t even know that he had a bulletproof vest on and was actually aiming for the chest and got lucky.

 

So I don’t know. I don’t think it was. There’s not really any like compelling evidence that it was a professional hit. There were some weird things that happened on the day, like this random jewish guy claiming that he was the shooter immediately and acting weird and so on. But none of that proves that it was Mossad or it was the CIA or all this kind of stuff that I’m seeing online.

 

So you can be open minded, you can entertain those theories, but just asserting that it’s true without evidence, just kind of, it de-legitimizes you, if you’re a public commentator, if you’re just going around asserting that particular groups did things without evidence.

 

So I’m not going to do that I’m going to go:

 

“Okay, well, if we take the official story at face value, it was an act of far-Left terrorism and far-Left terrorism is out of hand!”

 

It’s not like the first act of far-Left terrorism. And Antifa should be declared a terrorist organisation in every Western country. Anyone who funds or contributes to Antifa’s activities should be forced to immediately cease and desist. All of their assets should be taken, they should be criminally prosecuted. People expressing Antifa sympathies in public should basically be made illegal. This is how they want to treat nationalists who don’t engage in this kind of behaviour! You know, we don’t engage in this kind of behaviour, we don’t support it!

 

[30:37]

 

 

And if Antifa came out or elements of the communist left came out and said:

 

“We don’t support political violence, we disavow this in the strongest possible terms.”

 

Then they would at least be able to remove themselves of moral culpability. But name me one Leftist group that has done this? Not one Leftist group has done this, right? If someone who has far-Right sympathies engaged in an act of political terrorism, far-Right groups would say:

 

“Hey, this guy had nothing to do with us. We don’t support violence, we don’t support terrorism!”

 

Because they wouldn’t want to be seen as being supportive of terrorism because of all the consequences that that would ensue and the loss of public support and so on. On the Left, they basically don’t even have to disavow their own acts of terrorism. That’s how fucked the Left is, and also how weak the government is. In the United States apparently the Right is in power, the so-called “Right”. You’ve got Trump and you know, his administration. What are they focusing on right now? They’re focusing on trying to pass new laws to try and take passports of American citizens who criticise Israel, because the First Amendment exists in America they can’t just make criticising Israel illegal or something. So then they have to use an indirect means of saying:

 

“Well if you criticise Israel, we’re going to cancel your passport. So you can never travel internationally.”

 

To have like a chilling effect on discourse in America around Israel. That’s what their focus is on. Rather than on going after organised political terrorists that directly attacked Charlie Kirk, which supposedly is one of Trump’s top supporters.

 

You know, they had Air Force Two taking his body and it was this big political hoo ha and he’s personally friends with the whole administration. Imagine if there was an act of Right-wing terrorism, their reaction would probably be stronger. This has been pathetic and weak!

 

So the so-called Right is in power. They don’t see this as a political opportunity to go after our enemies because, and this is the fundamental problem with fucking conservatives. All they care about is doing the bidding of Israel, seemingly. But that’s it.

 

Like when it comes to actually fighting the Left and actually fulfilling their mandate, there’s a million and one excuses and you know, it’s a cuck fest. So it’s disappointing.

 

I wouldn’t expect like our Left-wing government down here to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, but how come no one on the Right is saying it? Why isn’t Pauline Hanson or even like people in the Liberal Party coming out and saying:

 

“Antifa needs to be listed as a terrorist organisation.”

 

That just engaged in organised violence on the streets here in Australia. Two weekends out of the last three weekends in a row, they’re shooting political commentators in the neck and executing them in America. This is a serious problem. Where’s that kind of narrative? No, instead you’ve got like literal Antifa members going on the ABC, justifying the shooting of Charlie Kirk basically, and then also calling for us to be classified as terrorists! And we haven’t actually committed even an iota of political violence other than defending ourselves from them attacking us.

 

So the Right is pathetic! This conservative establishment is fucking pathetic! The politicians in these parties and so on. And the pressure needs to come on! And this is why the people are ultimately going to come more and more to the radical National Socialist movement in this country and they’re going to move to the far-Right more and more around the world, because conservatives are too weak to actually take on the Left. They’re too weak to actually take on their own ostensible enemy. We are the only ones radical enough and clear thinking enough and earnest enough and true enough to say and propose actions that are going to be necessary to convince, confront this threat.

 

And so that to me is how we need to be framing this. That is how we’re going to win people over to our side is by calling this out, calling out the weakness of the conservative response.

 

I saw Trump being interviewed about this like two days after, or a day after:

 

“How are you feeling about the Charlie Kirk thing?”

 

And he just like changed the subject to building a new ballroom in the White House and that he’s feeling great. It’s like he doesn’t give a fuck! It’s like even if he doesn’t give a fuck, like in his heart I don’t really care about that. But why does he not see this as, look at this incredible political opportunity to classify Antifa, a group that is engaged in organised violence in America how many times like the BLM riots Antifa were playing a leading role in that, like burning down the whole country when Trump was president last time. They engaged in organised armed violence against ICE recently in the US over basically trying to stop ICE from deporting Mexicans from America because you know, they’re such anti-White pieces of shit that you can’t even deport illegal immigrants without them trying to like engage in like terrorism against the state. That’s insane!

 

Imagine if like the Right armed up and started like engaging in like terrorism under the Biden administration, like street terrorism and like shooting leading Left-wing, you know, commentators like at like public events and like taking up arms against the government. Would they just be like:

 

“Eh, whatever, it’s sad or it’s a problem.”

 

And just move on with their agenda? No, they would like literally go for the jugular against far-Right groups. So it really is pathetic!

 

But that’s what we’re dealing with. That’s why fascism is necessary! That’s why National Socialism is necessary! This suit and tie conservative, let’s just talk about it, cuck fest, let’s be the bigger person. It doesn’t cut it! It’s not going to fucking work! It’s ultimately it’s just going to lose and lose and lose and lose due to its own inherent weaknesses.

 

 

[36:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I sit with my back to the wall. Do you do that? If I’m at a restaurant waiting for a train, chances are some radical Leftist is going to try to stab me, or something worse. They’re very unlikely to confront me directly for obvious reasons. And so chances are I’ll be stabbed in my lifetime by one of these maniacs. So I sit with my back to the wall! Because I understand that communism and anti-fascism, they’re not real debatable opinions, not in the way that we are raised to believe constitutes a real opinion. Like anti-fascism doesn’t debate people, they just try to slander and kill people because they don’t represent an ideology, a real ideology. They only disguise themselves as an ideology to take advantage of liberalism, or a liberal society. But they’re always just hostile subversives. Hostile subversives trying to force themselves into a place of absolute authority.

 

They want to use that authority then to abolish liberalism, crush and enslave you! That’s what they want and they think it’s justified because of the perspective that White people have created suffering in the world and that’s what they deserve. This is plain faced what these people actually fucking are and what they believe! This is it! They’re cruel, petulant, ruthless enemies of our country and our entire civilisation around the world!

 

And they won’t be happy until we’re all gone. We’re all genocided and dead! They think that’s the solution to all the world’s problems because they think all the world’s problems have been caused by White people. They boil it down to something that embarrassingly simplistic, and they think they’re smart for doing that.

 

They want to kill me. They want to kill you. If you’re watching this and you’re even Right leaning, they want to kill you too. And they demonstrated that by just killing Charlie Kirk, the one who was trying to sit down and talk to him.

 

And yeah, they should be listed as a terror organisation right now! I suppose it’s still possible that some moves could be made in that direction once all the facts are known. I know that the FBI is apparently chasing far-Left groups who are associated with the shooter. And it might be possible, not might be possible, might be the case that at least one far-Left group called, I think the “Social Democrats of America” or something, I don’t even know. Democratic Socialists, maybe. They may have had prior knowledge. This guy who shot Charlie Kirk may have discussed his plans with them beforehand. They deactivated one of their social media accounts and many people had been seen coming to and from the shooter’s residence leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

 

So what else do I say about this man? I mean, the way I think the way I phrase that just then is as simple as it gets. Anti-fascists are the enemies of society. They want to kill White people and they don’t want us to exist in the future. They think everything bad that ever happened in history is our fault and they want to punish us for it. It’s pretty simple.

 

And the majority of them are actually White, which is really creepy! It’s creepy how effective propaganda can turn an entire race of people, or at least a fraction of a race of people against themselves through some sort of guilt complex. It hoodwinks you into thinking that all of human history is as simple as White people being evil and needing to be punished for it. And there are literally people who believe that and make it their day job to harass and execute White people as punishment for this perceived historical injustice. It’s really weird to me. It’s weird to me that they could even watch me say this and they still won’t understand how fucking retarded they are!

 

It’s bizarre that we have human beings, we live amongst human beings that are that simple and retarded! I struggle to wrap my head around the small capacity for thinking and understanding that’s natural to these people. I suppose the reason they exist is dysgenics, is they’re so genetically like retarded! They’re just like not very well bred and not very well raised and they haven’t experienced very good standard of living, or a stereotypical, a standard mother, father relationship as they grew up. And they have all sorts of internal mental problems as a result of that. I don’t know what it is exactly. It’s probably a complex of reasons why they end up believing nonsense!

 

But isn’t it funny, Joel, how they try to obfuscate the simplicity of their worldview by acting like they’re really educated and smart and over intellectualizing all of these weird socialist economic policies and pretending that they’re just against capitalism, pretending that they’re just against corporatism and they’re just against the big businesses and the people who are trying to exploit the worker. Workers of the World Unite! But it’s all fucking bullshit!

 

But it’s all a cover for the simplistic race hate, the anti-White race hate that is always driving them! They over intellectualise garbage and hide their true intentions behind slogans that everyone can get behind. But what they really want is to exterminate White people and punish White people for perceived historical sins. And what else can you say about it? That’s the situation that we’re living with in the world today.

 

 

I’m on a government watch list and banned from all social media. I get my bank accounts closed, I get raided by police on no evidence. I have been taken to court for hate speech, not necessarily because of anything I’ve said or done, but because I’m White and because I’m an effective critic of this anti-White ideology.

 

At the very least if you’re not going to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, which they are and always fucking have been, at the very least you could stop the subversive ideology which leads young White people to anti-fascism. You can stop that being taught in schools. I went to a university. I was only there for like three weeks. I wanted to see if I could study anything without being identified and removed because of who I am.

 

[42:38]

 

And it turns out I wasn’t allowed to study anything in Australia without being identified and removed because of who I am. Students ended up finding out who I was within about three or four weeks. And they said “they felt threatened”. And the course leader told me that I could no longer continue to study in that course.

 

But in only in the three or four weeks that I spent in that classroom. There were several quizzes introduced by an Aboriginal activist. We had to get the answers to the quizzes correct. And they consisted of:

 

“How many poor innocent Aboriginals the White British colonials had slaughtered upon first landing on the shores of Australia during the time of the settlement of the First Fleet?”

 

And it was made to seem as though all the settlement of Australia consisted of was evil White people coming to this land and massacring innocent Aboriginals who did nothing wrong. And they’re trying to rewrite the establishment of Australia as an evil, genocidal campaign conducted by White people against poor innocent natives. In only three weeks of trying to sit through a course on psychology, I was exposed to that multiple times! And some of the students actually argued against the teacher. They said:

 

“How is this relevant to psychology?”

 

And she argued back at them first, that:

 

“It’s relevant because you’re going to have Aboriginal clients and you need to understand their trauma and the sorts of association your race or how they’re going to associate your race with having committed or put them through that trauma. And so you need to know how to deal with that.”

 

And also:

 

“If you had a problem with it, maybe this wasn’t the course for you?”

 

What she was saying was:

 

“If you have a problem with anything that I’m saying right now, if you have a problem with this subversive, hostile, ideological campaign, then you get out of this psychology course, you racist fks!”

 

That’s basically what she said. [chuckling]

 

So this is taught in schools all the time! The foundational ideology, the groundwork for anti-fascist terrorism is anti-White ideology. It’s White people committed all these crimes and need to suffer, need to be punished. No rights for White people! No dignity for White people, no future for White people! That’s what motivates anti-fascism. That’s what just got Charlie Kirk shot in the neck. And it’s being taught in schools still right now, state schools, university. There are activist professors still spreading this shit to this day. So at the very least that needs to stop.

 

Then once that stops, maybe we can talk about removing these professors and removing these people from the police force and government institutions and courts and every other institution that matters to prevent this kind of sick ideology being taught to people. Not only talk to people, but used to leverage the entire state apparatus against its own citizens.

 

Anyway, yeah, I think I’ve had my rant. But do you do the same thing? Well, usually on the streams, we don’t have such long individual segments. We allow each other to talk a little bit more and we chime in and that kind of thing.

 

So maybe for the rest of the stream we can make it more like that. And I’ll ask you, Joel, do you sit with your back to the wall? Do you understand your own peril [chuckling] or the peril that you’re in as a result of your opinions?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, but at the same time I’m pretty relaxed because I’m not too worried about if:

 

“Oh, if some random anti-fascist sees me when I’m out.”

 

You know, I would say thousands of people, many thousands of people over the years have come up to me in public from recognizing me, from like, obviously seeing me on the Internet or in the newspapers or on the news or whatever. And basically every single time, I can’t think of even one instance when it wasn’t for a positive reason.

 

Maybe like one or two instances where it was negative. And they didn’t even come up to me directly. They basically, in both instances, they went up to the security guards of a bar I was drinking at and then I tried to explain to them that I’m a neo-Nazi, I need to be kicked out of the bar, for basically having political opinions and drinking beer at their establishment. And the security guards just looked kind of confused both times and then didn’t do anything.

 

So that’s it. Because these people are like individually pathetic losers. They need have an opportunity to get organised to engage in violence because they don’t have the capability to like, just like stand a bang, you know. There isn’t really like stand and bangers out there.

 

However, going out, you know, drinking or whatever, countless times I’ve ended up getting into fights with non-Whites, not because they know who I am, they have no idea who I am. Just because they violent and hateful towards White people and have low impulse control. So honestly, the threats in the public come more from the things that we’re actually talking about rather than who we are. Like just basically being a White guy in public in Sydney or Melbourne, going out on the piss, because there’s a lot of lunatics out there.

 

Blair Cottrell: The black guy on the bus that stabbed that Ukrainian girl, they’re saying that he’s just mentally ill. But what do you think? Because other people think that he was racially motivated, they’re trying to pass it off, …

 

[48:14]

 

Joel Davis: He was racially motivated. He said, literally on the video, he said:

 

“I just got that White bitch!”

 

And he’s surrounded by, like, five other black passengers on the train. He didn’t stab any of you know, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s also feminist culture. It’s the fault of feminist culture. Like, why was this tiny White Ukrainian girl on her own at night on a bus traveling around? She was probably working some bullshit job to try to survive because feminism has created a culture where that’s what women have to do they have to travel around on their own, and they have to try to work to survive on their own because they don’t get married, and they don’t have men in their life to support them.

 

So, again, this is just a combination of racial prejudice and feminism!

 

Joel Davis: And then she’s from Ukraine. So in Ukraine, they don’t really have that many blacks. So she didn’t grow up, … She grew up in a relatively homogenous country and then goes to New York.

 

 

And if you grew up in New York you know, never to relax around blacks, to keep your wits about you when you take the subway or whatever. But because I guess she was a foreigner, I guess she was naive, and yes, I mean, it’s just a great tragedy. Seems like a beautiful young girl. I mean, what a horrible thing. It’s just completely senseless violence. But these two instances are two, you know, potent expressions of White genocide. People say:

 

“Oh, Charlie Kirk, he took hundreds of millions of shekels from the jews to be one of their top butt goys and advance a Containment Zionist message.”

 

And that’s true. That’s true! I don’t want to shit too much on the guy who just got brutally shot in front of his kids. That is true!

 

However, the reason why that happened, the motivation of why that happened, was of a genocidal hatred towards our race. And even if you’re one of these people who believe that it was a Mossad hit, that’s also motivated by a genocidal hatred towards our race. So whatever you believe that the Mossad did it and covered it up, or Antifa did it, either way, it was an act of White genocide. The motivation is whether it was jews or communists, our two principal enemies since time immemorial, they hate us and want to kill us and want to genocide our people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me play devil’s advocate to you, Joel. Are you saying that people should have the right to make misogynistic racist, sexist and transphobic comments in public, thereby encouraging hate in our society amongst the youth at university campuses? This guy is spreading hateful ideology! This is a proponent of hate! Should this be allowed? Shouldn’t this be met with some sort of resistance?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that itself is promoting hate.

 

Like, obviously everyone who’s justifying the murder of Charlie Kirk is themselves promoting hate! They’re promoting hatred of White people. They’re promoting hatred of conservatives or nationalists or whatever. So.

 

Blair Cottrell: But do you seriously think, do you seriously think for a second, right, for when you look at this for what it is, this is a man sitting there saying words. He’s just saying words with a microphone. And other people who are interested in the words he’s saying, or maybe a little conflicted about what he’s saying, they’re crowding around him to exchange some more words.

 

Then there’s someone with a rifle who shoots a bullet through the guy’s neck! The guy who’s saying words, a bullet through his neck, exploding his arteries and killing him almost instantly, right? But the words being spoken are considered more hateful than that bullet! That’s more dangerous to society. I suppose when you’ve got a society built on words are considered just as just as much of a national threat as bullets. And that’s what it feels like, the bullshit that I’m seeing all around the Internet. That’s what it feels like they’re trying to sell people. As though the words this guy spoke, the words Charlie Kirk spoke, justified a bullet going through his neck. Because the words were just as dangerous, if not more dangerous than that bullet.

 

What sort of shit are you trying to hide? What sort of bullshit society are you trying to prop up when words to your system, are just as or more dangerous than bullets? Like, ask yourself that, right? Ask yourself to try to get to the bottom of this bullshit!

 

But I don’t know, man! Are we going to keep talking about this? Because I keep seeing. I’ll be honest with you. I keep seeing him being shot in my mind. I keep seeing the footage that I’ve seen. And it just makes me really angry! It makes me sick and angry. I’m very frustrated by it. I know that we needed to talk about it, but, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, good. You should be frustrated and angry by it. Should make people angry. Because anger is a gift from the gods to motivate us to do what needs to be done. The only response, only valid response to this is organising and building a political movement that can seize control of the government and bring this entire ideology down of Leftism, that can eradicate it entirely from our society.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who can do that?

 

[53:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: That’s the only solution. We cannot share countries with these people and with these ideas, these genocidal ideas being institutionalised and normalised, directed at us! It’s existentially not possible. If this is allowed to continue, it’s going to keep getting worse, it’s going to keep escalating, and eventually we’re going to be put into camps, we’re going to be put into Gulags. It might not happen next year or the year after, but that’s where this is going. That’s where it ends up. Because as you said:

 

“Oh, well, isn’t it hateful the ideas that we put forward, and therefore, doesn’t that justify violence?”

 

But it’s a total mirror image. For them our wanting to continue existing as a people is unacceptable. And for us, them wanting to continue exist as a political movement has to be fundamentally unacceptable, too. And ultimately it’s going to be us or them! Either we seize the state and eradicate them, or they continue or complete the project of seizing the state and eradicate us. That’s where this all goes. And you can say:

 

“Oh, that’s an extreme message!”

 

Or whatever, but it’s the fucking truth! And I had not heard a single argument that is adequate against it, because if you just follow these things through to their logical conclusion, that’s where it’s going. And that’s why the Right has to get fascist. People say, and I’m just using this in a loose sense, but when you say:

 

“Oh, why are you talking about Hitler and why are you advocating for National Socialism? This going to alienate the normies. You know, if you just presented yourself as a nationalist conservative and wore a suit and played down any, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, then they’ll shoot you., …

 

Joel Davis: Then you would appeal to more people. But at the same time, you would completely prevent yourself from actually promoting the idea that’ll win.

 

The idea that will win is the radical idea of actually using the state to crush our enemies. Anything less than that is not going to work. It’s unacceptable! You know, the conservatives win more elections than the Left, but then when they get in power, they don’t do anything. They’re fundamentally weak. They’re hamstrung by their own ideas. Trump is in power right now! We just discussed. He won’t go after Antifa. He won’t go after the far-Left. He won’t use this to actually, politically, advance.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why not? Why won’t he do that?

 

[Because Trump, like the rest of them is a stooge for Orgjew, that controls both parties and uses political divide as political theatre for the masses – K]

 

Joel Davis: Because then everyone would call him a fascist!

 

Blair Cottrell: Who cares! It’s a word! Fascist is a word. And they call everyone that. So who cares?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Well that’s exactly. Just be a fascist! Go:

 

“Yep, fuck you! I am a fascist. Time to go to prison libtards. Time to go to prison commies!”

 

Blair Cottrell: When the choice is to be a fascist or get shot, what are you going to choose?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Exactly! So that’s where this is.

 

But of course when it comes to Israel, all of a sudden he can be a fascist, all of a sudden, you know, which just really kind of exposes the bullshit of this whole scheme.

 

Another thing that I wanted to discuss though as well is its kind of related to this. You know, you see a lot of Right-wing objections. They say:

 

“When you say that you sound like a Leftist, being authoritarian is Leftist. You know, National Socialist, isn’t socialism Leftism?”

 

And you hear this kind of stuff. And they say:

 

“Well, if you’re truly Right-wing, you want freedom and liberal democracy and blah blah, blah!”

 

No! Yeah, like in a liberal democracy that’s functional, the right side is conservative, the left side is liberal, whatever.

 

But we don’t live in a functional liberal democracy. We live in a dysfunctional liberal democracy against an authoritarian Left. So we then have to mutate into a form that can compete and defeat the Left.

 

And the other side to this as well is that there is an alliance, a long established alliance between capitalism and Marxism against us! Against nationalists. We talked about this on the show before, many times. These were the two forces that made an alliance to destroy National Socialism and fascism in Europe. And these two forces still work in tandem today. The people who control international finance, the big corporations, they are in bed with this ideology.

 

You know, previously communists used to oppose themselves to the capitalists on a certain level, but this is long gone. Obviously if you talk to Leftists, they’ll express a whole series of anti-capitalist opinions. But in practice, ultimately their objective is to fight fascism far more than it is to fight capitalism. They critique capitalism academically, but when they actually mobilise in the street and engage in violence, it is against, quote, unquote, “fascism”. That’s the number one objective.

 

When it comes to the capitalist elite. They care more about fighting so-called “fascism” or racism or bigotry or whatever than they care about holding the socialist movement back. Because ultimately the social values of these two sides are basically equivalent. They agree on White genocide, they agree on transgenderism, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They agree on feminism and so on. And that’s actually what’s more important.

 

For us as National Socialists or what have you on the radical Right, for us, we don’t want to destroy capitalism for the express purpose of making everybody equal. What we want to do is we want to free our nations from the grip of international finance and this international clique of which there’s some homegrown elements of businessmen and financiers that have no loyalty to our nation and ultimately have loyalty to globalism and to a social programme of engineering, to genocide our race. That is what we’re opposing and we’re trying to fix.

 

Blair Cottrell: But let me know, would you eliminate private enterprise altogether or would you still encourage that to a certain degree?

 

Joel Davis: National Socialists never did that they never eliminated private enterprise.

 

[1:00:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically in a nutshell, you just stop, like foreign subversives, foreign interests, hostile people, …

 

Joel Davis: Take control of the financial system, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Lobbying from, like buying your media companies and lobbying your political institutions. Right, that’s what you stop.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! All National Socialism means is putting the interests of the nation first. It’s not this like libertarian ideology where the free market must be totally open. No, the national interest must come first. And it is in the national interest of people to be able to start their own businesses and own their own, you know, private property and so on. So that is maintained.

 

But also you need to have a certain amount of, … It needs to be balanced. There needs to be the state has to have power to intervene in the economy to ensure that the national interest is perpetuated.

 

So it’s a balancing. National Socialism is actually quite moderate when it comes to economic questions. But what it’s about is, it’s not about economically left versus economically right. We shouldn’t be defining Left and Right in terms of economics because the fundamental question is one of values. Before economics, humans are not economic entities. That’s actually a Marxist idea. Before, we are economic units, we are members of a national community. So our culture and our loyalty to one another must come first and foremost. That’s what National Socialism is about, getting the priorities correct.

 

And so when we come along, we basically are saying, before you define politics in economic terms, it’s actually a Leftist idea. We define politics in earlier terms. But National Socialists defend hierarchy. That’s why they’re considered far-Right. That’s why the Left understands National Socialists to be the far-Right and fascists to be the far-Right. They don’t recognise us as Leftists. They know that we’re on the other side. They fear us more than they fear you conservatives or libertarians. So clearly if the Left fears us the most, we’re their true enemy.

 

So this is just a ridiculous positing by these conservative elements.

 

When you look at the actual social values of these conservatives, they will be anti-racist just like the Left. They will be pro-gay marriage, just like the Left. They might even be pro-trans a lot of them. They basically adopt all the same social values as the Left does, but maybe a little bit less more moderate.

 

And then they go:

 

“We want low taxes, therefore we’re the true Right-wingers!”

 

Or something. It’s fucking ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, all socialism means is the group before the individual. That’s all it means, the group before the individual. What differentiates National Socialism from the Left is the perspective of what the group is. See the Left see the group as humanity and all of humanity being united against evil White devils. That’s the Left’s version of socialism. They pretend it’s about working class unity against capitalism, but that’s not actually what they believe. They’re kind of just borrowing old school communist literature.

 

And as I said, they over intellectualise their anti-White race hate. What the Left actually believe is uniting all peoples of the world against evil White devils! So to them the group is anyone and everyone, including White people, against White people! So you know, simple us versus them dynamic, simple common enemy and simple propaganda used to unite everyone against that common enemy.

 

But the kind of socialism, insofar as how it pertains to National Socialism, the group becomes the nation. And nation means race. It means a specific type of people, a specific ethnicity. So National Socialism could be understood as racial socialism. So like putting the interests of a specific ethnic group at the heart of everything you’re doing. It comes before the interests of the individual.

 

Joel Davis: And the key criticism of the National Socialists made of capitalism was not people owning their own businesses or owning their own homes or anything like that they supported that. Their primary criticism was of finance, of organised finance, of debt slavery. They wanted to liberate Germans from debt slavery! They didn’t want you stuck paying a mortgage to a bank the rest of your life. Because they understood that banks, because banks create money.

 

When you go to a bank and you get a credit card or you get a home loan, well, people don’t understand this. I say it a lot because a lot of people don’t understand this. The bank literally creates that money out of nothing. The bank isn’t a storehouse of money that previously exists. It creates money out of nothing and it expects you to pay it back out at interest. It’s a giant rort! The way the financial system is structured is a giant rort! It’s a parasitic rort! The banks, they don’t actually build anything. They don’t contribute anything. True value comes from productivity, from people who actually do a hard day’s work doing something productive in the economy. Banking is literally just moving numbers around in a computer system.

 

Okay, so like it does require a little bit of administrative work, but the exorbitant profits they make are far in excess of the actual value that is being created in that practice.

 

So that’s the criticism. National Socialists want to liberate the people from debt slavery by taking control of the financial system and eliminating usury from the system, which then liberates more wealth for the people and to ultimately to spur on economic development. That’s why when National Socialists came to power in Germany, there was what they called an “economic miracle.” Because they liberated the people from debt slavery. And immediately the German nation began advancing economically very quickly.

 

It was radically impoverished nation when the National Socialist took power in 1933, unemployment was like over 25%. The country was a mess. Within six years, within a year basically, they had full employment. And within six years Germany was so powerful it turned into like an industrial powerhouse that can compete with any nation on the planet. And it required basically the whole rest of the world to unite against it to defeat it in a six year World War. That doesn’t happen unless you have an incredible economic theory to advance the nation.

 

And that’s why the forces that rule us want to demonise National Socialism. Not just because they want to genocide our race, but they also don’t want nations realizing what Hitler and the National Socialists realised, which is that they can liberate basically how to liberate your nation from these parasitic international financial forces that the whole world is enslaved.

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not as complicated as having this genius economic theory. You basically just have to remove criminal elements and enemies to your country who are exploiting your country. Because having bad standards of living or just bad social situation generally is not a consequence of just people being unproductive or some sort of erroneous economic policy. People are unproductive and the economy is in turmoil because of all the corruption. Because people are exploiting circumstances to their own benefit. And if, like I said, if people are proud of themselves and they have a good reason to work hard, then productivity will increase and the economy kind of heals itself, especially if the corrupt criminal elements are removed from the economic process altogether.

 

Joel Davis: But what fundamentally, what I’m saying is that the financial system is fundamentally parasitic how it’s designed.

 

Blair Cottrell: So like, yeah, I’m not disputing that what I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: The whole structure of our economy here in Australia is just basically built off debt slavery. It’s getting you into [word unclear] for the rest of your life when you’re basically paying rent to a bank to live in your own home.

 

Blair Cottrell: What I’m trying to say, what I was getting at is one of the things preventing a nationalistic revolution is the importation of foreign labour force to essentially prevent the country from spiraling into Weimar conditions. Because Australia would become so broken, so poor that people would vote for a revolutionary government. But in order to prop up the existing economy, the existing workforce needs to be replaced with as much foreign labour as possible and as fast as possible.

 

So to keep this system going, I think that’s the major difference between pre-World War II Germany and Australia right now! Australia would basically fall into a similar state of economic chaos, but because they’re able to just like keep replacing the traditional Australian working class with people who just accept worse conditions, live in smaller spaces, work for less, work longer hours for less, that kind of thing, then it kind of prevents things from getting bad enough that people will vote in that revolutionary government that will actually fix the problem, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s just kicking the can down the road.

 

Blair Cottrell: It is, but it isn’t because if it leads to us failing to maintain our existence, then it’s not kicking the can down the road. It’s solving the problem that international capital currently has with White people. That is White people wanting a good amount of living space, White people wanting to be able to actually own property. That’s decent standard, decent standard of living. White people wanting rights and benefits and all that kind of stuff that we were raised to believe we should have.

 

Basically they’re standing in the way of international capital producing an effective slave class, or a slave race! I think that is the, at the heart of all conspiracies, that there’s a small network of very wealthy, very powerful people that are trying to breed a slave race! Which is going to be a combination of like Indian and Chinese and black people. It’s going to produce the perfect kind of low IQ subclass people that will never be intelligent enough to actually overthrow the government because they’ll never have a solid, meaningful identity. And to do away with the existing nations of the world the irritating White people who are irritating for reasons I just listed then that I think that is at the heart of all the greatest conspiracies in the world. The breeding of a slave race through coercion and force.

 

Joel Davis: Basically, you could say that, like capitalism and communism were like two jewish enslavement strategies.

 

Because as we’ve talked about on the show, I think some time ago, Werner Sombart’s Jews and Modern Capitalism*, where it’s like one of the best books ever written on the history of capitalism by one of the greatest economic historians ever! And he kind of painstakingly goes through the history of the beginnings of capitalism and how jews played a leading role basically in kind of reshaping European political and economic life through the period before and just after the Industrial Revolution. And capitalism basically is jewish!

 

[* https://archive.org/details/jewsandmodernca00sombgoog]

 

I’m not going to go into a whole diatribe about that text and I’m going to save it for another day, but I have done that on a previous episode.

 

But also, obviously, Karl Marx was a jew, and jews were instrumental in the development of Marxist ideology and the Bolsheviks. Jews are massively over-represented, etc, etc. Everyone knows this.

 

So then what happened with the rise of National Socialism was basically Europeans and fascism as well to a lesser extent, Europeans come up with a solution, a way to break free of both these forms of jewish enslavement. Then what has happened since World War II, and these two jewish enslavement machines essentially allying with one another to defeat National Socialism was we then moved from simply jews attempting to enslave Whites, whether it be enslave them through false promises of liberation. They sell you capitalism as:

 

“Oh goy, you’re on the free market. You get to choose where you want to work. You get to choose what you buy and sell. And so ultimately you’re within a free system!”

 

And obviously communism sells itself to you as it’s freeing you from the bondage of capitalism, freeing the worker from the bondage of the bourgeoisie. And so they’re kind of pseudo liberations that are really like forms of enslavement as we could see, in how they actually manifest in practice rather than in theory.

 

But then after World War II, where it became clear that the White man couldn’t be held down by these enslavement ideologies. Then it became necessary to genocide and replace Whites. It was no longer adequate to build a kind of communist dictatorship or build a liberal, democratic capitalist industrial system and just parasitically enslave and extract resources from a White underclass for a jewish elite.

 

Then what became necessary was gutting them entirely because now they couldn’t trust the White man to be a good little goy! Now they real the White man had ideas of his own, overthrew this system and built a third option, National Socialism, that both destroyed Marxism and destroyed kind of usury finance capitalism and liberated the nation from these two systems.

 

And so now what you see is these two systems mutate into genocidal forms. So now finance capitalism mutated into this globalist form which basically generates mass immigration and the liquidation of national cultures and this kind of mongrelisation process across the West. And then Leftism went from being primarily focused upon, kind of economic dimension to basically being an explicit ideology of White genocide. That basically what so-called Cultural Marxism is the idea that:

 

“Well the White working class, we shouldn’t be trying to build a political movement out of it because the White working class are Patriarchal and nationalistic bigots! And so the White working class will just create a fascist movement if they’re allowed to, if they’re left to their own devices. So we have to actively undermine them by spreading feminism and multiculturalism and you know, gay and transing, you know, up as many of their kids as possible and render them politically useless by reducing them to unaffectatious minority with their own women and mental defectives turned against them and so on.”

 

As we see now. So that’s basically how we’ve got into this position. And National Socialism was the solution to the first option.

 

And the second option was basically built as an anti-fascist adaptation of these two systems. Like the reason why capitalism turned into a globalist ideology was to prevent anything resembling nationalism from being regenerated. That if they could just like mix all the populations of the global marketplace together and mix the economies together and make them as complexly interwoven as possible, then there would be no national bodies that could resist this international financial matrix.

 

And again, if they could fundamentally undermine White culture and mongrelize and destroy our kind of core stock as much as possible, eventually the damage would be so great that it would be impossible for us to ever build anything resembling a fascist movement ever again! That’s explicitly what these theorists say, more or less. And I’m obviously taking a bit of interpretive icence, but not that much.

 

So that’s why we believe what we believe and why what we believe fundamentally is the only solution. Because no other political ideology truly confronts these problems.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been a good stream so far. And we’ve got a fair few viewers tonight, probably because we haven’t had a solid stream in a few weeks. I think. I’ve been absent and you know, last week we had some technical issues. I had some technical issues anyway, but thanks everybody for tuning in and thanks for staying with us.

 

We’ve probably got a couple of other subjects to cover before we wrap it up. Joel, I know that we have the whatever they were there was like some Australia Unites march, which seems to have just detracted from the stop immigration message that took place a day or two ago, I think we can get into that a little bit. And we’ve also got a bit of an update on Tom Sewell’s situation in the Victorian courts.

 

But what do you reckon about the Australia Unites marches or rallies? Did you see any footage?

 

Joel Davis: Let’s talk about Sewell in court first and then I’ll pull that up. So I’m going to pull up a couple videos to show the difference between the two marches, at least in Melbourne.

 

Blair Cottrell: But as far as I know what I’ve been told, I’ve been flat out with work personally this week. So I haven’t had a lot of time because you can actually watch a lot of Tom Sewell’s legal proceedings through video link, I think. And I have a couple of mates who have been doing that and filling me in on what’s been happening. He was found guilty of intimidating a police officer for talking about or discussing some personal details regarding that police officer on this stream, I believe. On The Joel and Blair Show last year.

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if you remember the full context, but I remember the context and this, by the way, is unrelated to the recent arrest. He just happened to be in court fighting this other charge when he was arrested in relation to what happened on August 31st. And Tom was found guilty of this, but he was only given 200 hours community service. So I guess it’s not that big of a deal, all things considered because there’s no custodial sentence and the real fight is ahead of him with this August 31st stuff like the assault charges and so on relating to that day.

 

But basically, people might remember we did two, what we called “Fuck Off We’re Full” rallies. We had a big Fuck Off We’re Full banner last year. The rallies were counter-protests against, … There was basically communists in Melbourne, had and around the country. But in Melbourne was where we did these rallies. They had organised a whole series of subcontinental and Middle Eastern people who were so-called refugees and wanted basically permanent visas to stay in Australia to basically protest out the front of the Department of Home affairs and demand permanent visas, as if they’re just entitled to permanent visas because they say so.

 

And as we went down to counter-protesters twice, once originally, and then when they basically had their big hundred days of doing this permanent Visa encampment thing, they did a big rally, and we went in counter-protest at their big subsequent rally. At that event, people might remember, I got pepper sprayed in the face. I was the only guy there without a mask on for that one. A lot of the boys got pepper sprayed. We still continued the rally anyway and it turned into a success. It was a media success. It was kind of a cool NSN rally.

 

But during the process of that rally, when we first went up to the encampment when we all got pepper sprayed, there was a couple police officers in plain clothes who had batons and they were pretty violent towards some of our members. Nathan Bull actually was hit with the baton multiple times and he kind of just like guarded it with his arm like this. And he had like huge marks down his arm. Obviously he’s a tough boy, so he was okay, but it was just totally unnecessary and senseless violence. And this one, this individual who assaulted Nathan Bull also when we., … Because after we got pepper sprayed, we decided to just go around the corner and go to a different position and just do the rally there anyway. And we just completed the rally regardless.

 

And as we were doing that, this police officer came up to another one of our activists who was just standing there peacefully in the park. He wasn’t engaging in violence or he was just standing there doing the chants and so on, and went to grab at his balaclava and try and rip his balaclava off. And the guy pushed the cop away and step, kind of like took a step back and the cop kind of gave up on the whole idea. That’s assault. Grabbing someone else’s article of clothing is assault.

 

So the police officer assaulted multiples of our members and obviously that second assault was with the intent to pull his balaclava up so that his face would be broadcast on national television as a way to dox him. What Tom said on the stream was like, Tom literally said:

 

“I’m going to look at the law and figure out if this is legal first, and how to do it. But I looked into this guy, I know what his real name is. And in the past when our activists have been assaulted, we’ve made complaints and nothing has come of it. No one cares. Apparently the police are just legally allowed to just assault us for no reason with no accountability.”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, the only recourse I have now is public accountability, so maybe I should say who this police officer is. But I look into the laws around it. So I don’t want to commit a crime like intimidating a police officer or something.”

 

But he kind of speculated that he would, that there had to be some kind of public accountability on this kind of behaviour, because this behaviour can’t go on. Tom was then charged with intimidating a police officer for that. And he was subsequently found guilty. I mean, it’s just a ridiculous judgement! But like I said, he didn’t get a custodial sentence. He got 200 hours community service, which I presume he’ll have to log when he gets out of jail.

 

But you know, considering the more serious things that he’s facing, it’s probably the last thing on his mind now that it’s over, gonna focus on fighting these more serious charges. But it’s just ridiculous that he would be legally charged and then found guilty for something like that, when you really consider the context.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did he actually say for that he was found guilty for, though?

 

Joel Davis: Intimidating a police officer. Because apparently, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I know that but on what basis was he found guilty? What did they claim that he said?

 

Joel Davis: They said that the police officer and the police officer’s wife felt intimidated that Tom Sewell knew their address and was contemplating, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So he said on the stream:

 

“I know their address.”

 

Is that what he said?

 

Joel Davis: Well, he said he looked up the guy and then he’s like, all of his personal information is all over everything. I can see what he’s housed, I can see his wife. He’s like, he didn’t say he was going to release any of that stuff. He just said, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I still kind of I get your perspective, but at the same time I don’t know, I don’t know. That’s a bit sketchy. It’s a bit sketchy to be like:

 

“Hey, I know where this guy lives and I’ve got pictures of his wife.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like, …

 

[1:24:42]

 

Joel Davis: Like what he said that when he looked up who the guy is, the guy himself had pictures of his house and his wife on his social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: So he was trying to say, like, this guy’s just got all of his stuff up on his social media. It’s quite reckless. And he doesn’t want to be held accountable. Maybe he shouldn’t have. That was kind of, I guess, point, but his point. He also said:

 

“I’m not going to put anything out until I look at the law and figure out what to do legally, because I don’t want to break any laws here.”

 

And then he didn’t actually follow it up by doing anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he didn’t share any information.

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: He just said that he has information.

 

Joel Davis: That he knew it. Yeah. That he looked into who this guy was because he thought the public should know that this individual thinks that he’s got the right to just assault political peaceful political activists. That is unlawfully.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was found guilty on those grounds. Specifically. He hasn’t been sentenced to any jail time, but he’s still in jail. That’s because he’s been held on remand for a series of other charges. Remand means the police have convinced a judge that you’re a danger to society, a flight risk, or you’re going to reoffend.

 

And so you’re kept in police custody or state custody up until your court date. You do have more opportunities to apply for bail in the future, but usually you apply every three to six months, especially if you’re appealing a bail application to a higher court. That can take longer than three months, and I believe that’s what he’s trying to do.

 

So how long is Tom in jail for? At this point, no one’s sure. I’m pretty sure he’ll be applying for bail again soon. In the next few months, perhaps. I’m not exactly sure a date. However, what I can tell you is he’s been held on remand because a judge has been convinced that he’s a danger to society. A magistrate accepted that argument from the police prosecution.

 

He has quite a number of charges. He’s facing quite a number of charges as a result of some of his activity on August 31st. And we’ll keep you guys updated. I suppose I’ll keep you guys updated as well on what’s going on. I do know that you can through a certain system available which I didn’t even know about because you know I did some jail time a long time ago, and back then you had to physically write letters into prisoners.

 

But now there’s a system where you can email a prisoner and as long as you confirm and prove your identity to the email prisoner system, you can actually send him a letter that way if you want to. And I know he would appreciate letters. Jail gets very boring. It’s a very boring, mundane place. He’ll do the best he can to keep himself occupied with books but it’s going to be great for him to get letters. I know that he’ll appreciate that.

 

I’ll try to figure out while Joel shows you guys, show you, shows you guys this video that email a prisoner link and I’ll post it in the live chat and maybe we’ll leave it.

 

Joel Davis: I think the White Australia Telegram page, I’ve shared it before. You can find it on their account and you can share it how basically because you need, … You want to write Tom a letter or you want to send him an email, you need to address it to him regardless.

 

So the information on how to do that is on the White Australia Telegram page. So you should just share it on Telegram and people can see it there.

 

But anyway, I want to show everyone a difference. Two videos. This video is in Melbourne on August 31st and for the Stop Immigration Anti-mass immigration March for Australia rally.

 

 

 

See absolutely massive crowd all the way down the street. Just absolutely packed as far as you can see in every direction.

 

Now I’m going to show you the crowd from the September 13. What was it?:

 

“Anti digital ID, government corruption, anti-racist, pro-aboriginal, we’re not Nazis, but we also think maybe a slight reduction in immigration would be good rally!”

 

I’m not kidding! That’s literally what it was. I’ll show you that crowd in Melbourne from last week. Same camera angle. That’s the crowd.

 

 

vv There you go guys. That’s the crowd.

 

Joel Davis: So as you can see, everyone said:

 

“Oh, if the NSN show up to this rally no one will want to come. And you can’t just make a rally against mass immigration and talk about how there’s too many Indians in Australia and how we’ve got to shut down the borders. It’s too extreme, it’s too radical! No one will show up. No one wants that. We need to we need to cuck it out!”

 

So basically the people who said that and who tried to hijack August 31st and turn it into a cuckservative, pro-zionist, pro-aboriginal, anti-racist event, we made sure that they didn’t. And so they held their own event on September 13th to line up with the jewish agent Tommy Robinson’s big anti-immigration rally in London. Which was massive, to be fair. I think they had some estimates a quarter of a million people there. I’ve seen some estimates even more. Looked like a lot of people in London.

 

But to line up with that, they held these all over the country. And the crowds were quite disappointing. I think the largest crowd might have been in Sydney, but it was still only a small fraction of what there was on August 31st.

 

[1:30:29]

 

And also a lot of the people that were there thought that they were there for another March for Australia, fuck immigrants rally. And then when the speeches started, they realised, oh:

 

“Shit! This is cucked!”

 

And they all just left. There’s even footage I saw from Brisbane which only had maybe like one and a half thousand people max, maybe a thousand people show up. Then the organiser got on the stage and did like a half hour speech meandering around, where he spent half the speech talking about how:

 

“The March for Australia was run by Nazis and it’s a psyop to try and divide races and that we need to be united regardless of whether you’re black, White or brown or whatever.”

 

And he started talking about how we need to unite with Muslims and all this kind of stuff. And the crowd started heckling him and getting angry. And they all, more than half the crowd seemed to have walked off by the time he finished speaking.

 

So huge L [loss] for these people that they were all attacking and criticising August 31st. A lot of them were non-White. A lot of them have links with establishment conservative circles. No one’s buying what you’re selling! No one wants what you’re selling. Your politics sucks! It’s not interesting, it’s not dynamic!

 

And what it shows is that controversy sells. The reason why there was a massive turnout on Aug 31 was because the government was condemning it, the media was condemning it. Running stories about how Nazis are involved, running stories about how the organisers have denied the “Holocaust”, or the organisers justified violence during the Cronulla riots, or the organisers are racist or the organisers hate Indians, whatever. That amped it up and that made people want to come!

 

So the people want nationalism, the people want racism! The people don’t want slop conservative garbage! And I feel vindicated that our kind of politics is ascendant. And all the people on the Right that say that we’re horrible and we need to be marginalised and discluded because we’re fringe. Well, actually more people want to come and march with us on the issues that we care about, then want to come and march with you for your garbage. So who’s actually fringe? I think you’re fringe!

 

Blair Cottrell: I already made a post about this on my public Telegram channel. But just to summarize, it just seems like all the we’re getting so many live comments on this show. Appreciate all the support, guys. And I’ll just add the Superchats you guys want to leave. They’ll all be read out at the end.

 

The messages of what was it like stopping racism and digital IDs and, I don’t know, things that are legitimate concerns for people to some degree. It just seemed like an effort to detract from the main source of the problem, which is the government just basically replacing the Australian worker right now with as many people as possible from India. Everyone sees and feels that. And everyone is feeling the impact on the standard of living as a consequence of that immigration policy.

 

And what, like, why can’t that just be addressed for the problem that it is without “racism” and all that kind of stuff flying around? It’s like, I think people are sick of anti-racism. People are sick of it! Because it’s really gay! Anti racism is really weak and gay k, and people are sick of it!

 

So every effort the more conservative types are trying to make to still maintain that more centrist position in order for in order to appeal more to the masses, that time is over now. I understand the urge to do that. I understood it more five years ago than I do now. But you got to adapt and move with the times.

 

And as things become more radical, people are willing to accept more radical positions. And hey, everyone’s actually racist! The people who are accused of the most racism are ironically, the least racist people in the world right now, which is White people. Black people are racist, Asians are racist. Everyone’s racist. It’s a very natural phenomena. It’s pretty normal to be racist. Your baby’s racist when it’s born. It prefers to be around people that it can recognise as similar to its own kinship. So don’t be so scared of that racist bullshit! Don’t be so scared of that word. It’s just a word. It’s just bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: And so all these people online that are like:

 

“Oh, if you have Nazis at your rally and if you say racist stuff, no one’s gonna show up and no one wants to march with you!”

 

All those people that say that shit that are in the conservative online opinion having sphere, they just had their little fucking cuck rally and no one wants to show up to your cuck rally, actually! People want to show up to an Aussie pride rally, actually!

 

Blair Cottrell: Nazi is just a word as well. And Nazi means National Socialist. And the people who represent that position, they don’t believe that any gassing of 6 million people in gas chambers happened. They think that that’s war propaganda. The people who actually represent that opinion, they think that’s all made up! So trying to dehumanise or vilify people as “Nazis” because they want to genocide people, it’s very disingenuous. Government bureaucrats and academics, you know, “leaders” of popular culture, they’re still using that disingenuous argument by deliberately misrepresenting what so-called “Nazis” actually believe in order to make them out to be villains.

 

In reality, they’re all just people. They’re people who believe that the masses have been fed vicious lies about history and they want to tell the truth! Not only do they want to tell the truth, they want to provide solution to the problems this country has. That’s the truth! We’re not dealing with some sort of brutal, horrible monster out there! There’s not Nazi zombies lurking around every corner waiting to eat your brains! This doesn’t. [chuckling] Everyone’s a person with a real opinion except the anti-fascists.

 

The only people who basically are unreasonable, unwilling to debate or open dialogue, and who just want to kill you for the sins of your ancestors. As I’ve already laid out at the beginning of this stream, the far-Left anti-fascists, they’re the only ones that pose a serious threat to your family and to society. Everybody else you’ll find is generally reasonable, especially the so-called racists!

 

Joel Davis: But also all of these people who advance this argument:

 

“Oh, no one likes the Nazis, no one wants to be associated with the Nazis. That’s going to like kill the rally. And we’ve got to distance ourselves from them, …”

 

Pretty much all of them are actually non-White or they have a non-White wife or husband or they’re jewish or they work in the conservative establishment or something. They all have ulterior motives. They’re against nationalism, period! Not just against Nazism, they’re against nationalism and they’re trying to water down the message. They don’t stand for White Australia! They don’t stand for keeping Australia White. They don’t stand for the actual historical Australian people in our interests.

 

And so anti-Nazi is anti-White. Anti Nazi is actually anti-Australia from all of these people, just like it is from the politicians when they attack us. They don’t want to debate us on substance. They basically just want to try and scare you into not associating with us or being afraid to work with us or afraid to be seen supporting us because of the social penalty:

 

“Oh, everyone will freak out and no one wants to hear that message!”

 

And it’s just gaslighting! *

 

[* Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or group causes someone to question their own reality, memories, or perceptions, often leading to confusion, loss of confidence, and dependence on the manipulator. The term originates from the 1938 play (and later film) Gas Light, where a husband deliberately dims the gas lights in their home and then denies it, making his wife doubt her sanity. See Gaslighting in White Glossary.]

 

 

But actually the rally that we showed up to, that we were publicized as supporting and attending and so on was way more successful than their version. So what it shows is actually you need us there! We provide the controversy, we provide the radicalism, we provide the protective shield to keep all of that crap out and keep the actual pure message in! And to the success of August 31 a lot of people that aren’t in the NSN made that possible, but you know, we were an integral element in it because without us there to push all of those forces out, they probably would have had a lot more success in hijacking it, subverting it, watering it down, and then you wouldn’t have a real nationalist rally and instead you would just be given what you were given on September 13th.

 

Basically a whole bunch of anti-racist speeches and cuckservative meandering about digital ID and you know, fucking global warming and how we need to burn more coal and all this like side issue bullshit! We’re being fucking genocided! Our country’s being stolen from us! That is the number one issue. That’s what matters! All this other stuff is secondary.

 

So it was great to see their rally fail. And you know there’s going to be another march for Australia I’m hearing in late October. Interesting to see how that goes.

 

But the big one, the big one is going to be Australia Day! On Australia Day next year, I know March for Australia is going to mobilise full force. We are going to mobilise every nationalist group and organisation, and every nationalist individual in Australia needs to mobilise on Australia Day. We need to flood our cities with Aussies, with Aussie flags and patriotic spirit! I mean take our cities back on Australia Day. Take it back from the communist Aboriginal garbage that has taken it over in recent years, and reassert our national pride and our sovereignty over this country. That is the big one!

 

And I think the success of August 31st and hopefully the continued success of the October 19th rally, I believe, and so on, will help, you know, set the stage for a massive mobilisation on Australia Day. To me, that’s the big one! Because if on Australia Day, patriots mobilise in their droves and take back all the cities of Australia a sea of Aussie flags and White faces, I think it will be a kind of spiritual revival of sorts of our people.

 

Because Australia is under attack, our national identity is under attack. Obviously, we live under a regime that is occupying us and calls itself the Australian government and pretends to be representative of Australia, but actually hates Australia! And is really trying to destroy Australia! The people rising up against it en masse, because the biggest issue we have in Australia is, I would say, apathy! The average Australian wants Australia to keep being Australia and isn’t happy with the direction of the country. But they’re not doing anything. There’s no vehicle for them to express that. I think this could be something quite powerful. I thought August 31st changed the mood in Australia. I think Australia Day could be even more potentially potent in changing the national mood and setting the tone for a new paradigm.

 

Blair Cottrell: The State’s going to be used to rough us up a bit before that happens. The average Australian will be fine if you’re just a regular march attendee, but anyone who has any kind of influence, any positive reputation, good standing with the public right now, whether it’s people streaming public, speakers, organisation leaders. Yeah, they’re going to come up with whatever they can to harass us, get us into court.

 

I’m going to do my best to stay out of all that shit, but we’ll see what they come up with, because it turns out I’m on their radar, too, despite not really doing anything apart from appearing on these streams. Interesting! It’ll be interesting indeed to see what they come up with. But whatever. It’s all new territory we’re moving into now. Like, it’s not just a matter of going to court for some summary hate speech offence or losing your bank account or the stuff that we’re used to, they’re going to ramp it up and they’re going to try new things to shut us up. And I don’t even know what they’re going to come up with, but it’s a little bit concerning.

 

But whatever, you know whatever! We’re in too deep now. We’ve come too far to turn back.

 

[1:42:56]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, anyway, maybe we could do the Superchats and wrap the show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: That sounds good because I wanted to go to the gym. I haven’t been to the gym yet.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Blair going to the gym. But I didn’t realise you went to the gym, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes do that. Yeah, sometimes. Sometimes a mate of mine just fills me in with some really interesting spergy facts about history while I’m in the gym.

 

A lot of people like that video about the fingers, the story about the British fingers, and a lot of people told me they don’t think it’s true. There’s a mixed opinion about that. And what I’m talking about is where the “rude finger” came from. I won’t do it on the show because I’m obviously not vulgar like that, but this finger from the British. You know how the British are like “up yours”. Yeah. Joel told me during one of our workouts a while ago.

 

Joel Davis: It’s good folklore. It’s good folklore. Like who cares if it’s true or not? It’s exceptional folklore. It’s ancient, you know, Anglo Saxon folklore.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about, what we’re talking about, if you don’t know, is apparently the French, when they would capture British archers or longbowmen, they’d use these fingers for archery to pull the bow back. And when they captured those archers that cut their fingers off to prevent them from firing any more arrows.

 

But if you still had your fingers and you came up against the French you do this as like a gesture of rebellion or insolence like:

 

“Hey, we still have our fingers. We can still shoot you!”

 

And then eventually, like, one finger dropped and it just became the rude finger. But some people say that’s not the case, that the rude finger is an exclusively American phenomena. But I don’t know. I think there’s merit to the theory that Joel put out there. And it is cool folklore. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, I was taught that as a young boy, and I think a lot of Anglo Saxons were taught that as a young boy. It’s folklore of our people. And I don’t care what some jewish anthropologist says that’s trying to deconstruct our ancient lore.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like no one let’s you have anything, do they? Anything interesting or cool from you know White or European history. It’s just like you’ve got some fact checker thing saying:

 

“False, that’s not true! It’s not that cool actually!”

 

But the Superchats I listed, if you want to read them out, Joel, I listed them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll read them out. So WhiteBitch666 said:

 

“Fuck these psychotic commies. I’m so sick of all these tranny lovers in my country. They will try to kill you if you refuse to call a broad chinned man a woman, or recognise difference between races.”

 

Well, I think I feel you on that one. The Bearded Indian said:

 

“Communism is an expression of Judaism. Trump will not designate Antifa a terrorist organisation because that would contravene the interests of Trump’s jewish donors.”

 

I don’t know if that’s necessarily. I mean, I agree with you that communism is a product of the jews, obviously. But I don’t know if that’s where Trump’s apprehension comes from because Antifa has caused problems for Israel. Because the communists and the Zionists don’t see eye to eye on that issue.

 

So I don’t know if the Zionist donors behind Trump would even really get in his way on Antifa, which only makes it all the more pathetic! That he basically has nothing holding him back other than his own weakness, basically, and his own political like assertion.

 

Blair Cottrell: How do we know? It’s still early days and the FBI is still doing its investigation. So how do we know that he won’t turn around and list them?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I just, it’s not the vibe that I’m getting and it’s not the vibe that I’m getting.

 

Blair Cottrell: He might go for one obscure Leftist group. Like there’s a Leftist group that’s been named here as possibly associated with the Charlie Kirk’s assassin called the Democratic Socialists of America. It just looks like, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s not an obscure group Blair. That’s actually a massive group!

 

Blair Cottrell: It looks really gay and shit though their logo is really crap. So I thought it was just thrown together online or something.

 

Joel Davis: Well, like, let’s look it up. How many members does the Democratic Socialist of America have? 85,000.

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose that’s decent. Yeah. But maybe you can start off by listing a group like that as a terror org. Right. And then you work your way up.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, that would be cool if they look, if they do that, that’d be pretty fucking cool! Liam4 said:

 

“Has Blair finished Doom Eternal yet?”

 

That’s for you, obviously.

 

[1:47:33]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I finished it, but I saw a lot of videos of people who are really good at it. Like, really good! Because that game has been out for a while. And I wanted to get that good too.

 

So I started like, changing all the binds on my keys and my mouse buttons and I started practicing to try to do quick switching as best I could while staying in the air as often as I could. This is Doom Eternal. And I got really mad, bro! [chuckling] I gotta be honest. That game is really hard. It’s one of those games that it doesn’t matter how good you get, the AI system of the enemies is so aggressive and sophisticated that they’ll just chase you down and really make you have a bad day. I did finish the game, to answer your question, in short.

 

But then I started playing it to try to become really good at it, and I just got really angry with it. I got kind of good, but not as good as some people are. Like the videos I’ve seen on YouTube of gameplay on Doom Eternal. Fucking insane! It’s like really cool how good at something people can get, guys especially. But the more I tried to play Doom Eternal and get better at it, the more I started thinking I should do piano or something if I’m going to commit to something that’s like I’m going to get really good at, I should do it with something that’s a little bit more sophisticated or cultured than Doom Eternal. [chuckling] I mean, am I a bit of a nerd for thinking that? I don’t know?

 

Joel Davis: No, no. You’re 100% correct in thinking that. ItWasMadeUp said:

 

“Did Striker ever respond to the debate offer?”

 

He turned it down. So [Mark] Collett proposed the idea that because Eric Striker, I guess an old associate turned annoying retard on the Internet, he started throwing shade at Tom Sewell and myself. He started criticising Tom after the August 31 rallies. Because in Tom’s speech he says:

 

“Oh, when the Palestinians and the communists came for the Aussie flags, it was us that defended them.”

 

And then Striker said:

 

“Oh, look, the NSN in Australia, they’re not real National Socialists because they’re attacking Palestinians and they’re playing into the hands of the jews!”

 

And it was just so ridiculous! At the same rally, the NSN threw Zionists out, including Avi Yemeni and his goons. We push Zionists out behind the scenes of the rally in general.

 

And obviously we’re anti-jewish and anti-zionist, fundamentally. We’ve always had a policy of staying out of the way of the pro-Palestine rallies. We don’t want to be attack dogs for the jews. We’re not going to help the jews out by taking out their enemy. We’re going to let them deal with their own problem.

 

But the Palestinians have been rallying in the street. And let’s be real, the Palestinian issue has been hijacked by communists, particularly in Melbourne, that then use it for, to give them an excuse to rally every week. Because they can’t get people to rally every week around communism, but they can get people to rally every week around the Palestine issue. And so they’ve hijacked the pro-Palestine thing.

 

But the other pro-Palestine groups that are run by like Arabs and stuff have been complicit and work with these communist groups. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why have they done that? Why do the Arabs work with transvestites and Marxists and feminists and all these weird cunts from the city? Like, why do the Muslims tolerate that shit?

 

Joel Davis: Well, obviously it has some benefit because the Left has made concessions to the pro-Palestinian side. And so there’s obviously some political benefit they achieve from that.

 

But anyway, they cast their die with these communists. And in the lead up to this rally, I got intelligence from my sources in the pro-Palestine movement. A few sources that are a little bit more anti-communist, were telling me that there was a little bit of infighting inside the movement and that some pro-Palestinian voices that are predominantly Arabs were saying:

 

“We don’t want to be oppositional to the march for Australia, rather just like do our own thing and avoid it.”

 

And the communists insisted, particularly in Melbourne:

 

“No, (and I think in Brisbane as well.) No, the pro-Palestine march must mobilise and attack basically the March for Australia!”

 

And I put out a post, I said:

 

“Don’t play into the hands of the communists. Come out now, oppose this. Distance the pro-Palestine movement from this.”

 

Because I wanted to March for Australia to be a success. I didn’t want it to be attacked. We have left the pro-Palestine movement alone for two years! We asked them to leave us alone for one day! And okay, the communists attack us. You could say:

 

“Oh, but the communists, just dressed up as, brought Palestinian flags and attacked you. You can’t blame that on the pro-Palestine movement.”

 

Okay, but who in the pro-Palestine movement has come out in the days since and condemned the violence of people that are wearing the kaffir and holding the Palestine flags, condemned the violence that they perpetrated against Australian patriots? And said:

 

“Oh, we don’t agree with that. And we disavow that.”

 

Blair Cottrell: I did not. I did Notice that on August 31st though, the Muslims weren’t with the Leftists counter-protesters. The Palestinians really weren’t. There was Palestinian flags.

 

Joel Davis: In Melbourne there wasn’t that many there, of course. I agree with this. But they didn’t publicly distance themselves or condemn it. Right? They should have said:

 

“Not in our name. We don’t agree with this. We don’t want to, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but I think by just not showing up, by saying nothing and not showing up, that is basically saying it.

 

[1:53:19]

 

Joel Davis: But they didn’t completely not show up in the sense that there were like the pro-Palestine movement officially was on the posters and there were brown people at the counter-protests. I saw some in the Sydney counter-protest images and so on. It wasn’t all Whites, so, …

 

But look, when Tom said the Palestinians, he wasn’t saying, he wasn’t insinuating himself in the Palestine Israel conflict. He wasn’t taking the side of Israel against Palestine. He was just talking about the pro-Palestinian protesters.

 

Blair Cottrell: People can only think in simplistic dynamics. And so as soon as you criticise only one thing but not the other, or you mention one thing and not the other, people assume that you’re declaring some sort of allegiance or, not allegiance necessarily, but favouritism to the other side.

 

And that’s why people started accusing him of being pro-Israel because he only called out Palestinians in that segment of the speech. But he didn’t say anything about Israel. And that’s how simple people are.

 

Joel Davis: Tom Sewell, he calls out Israel way more than he calls out Palestine. Like in general he talks about Israel and jews a lot. If you go on his Telegram, you type in Israel and then he’s had to make a whole series of new Telegrams. So it’s not even an old Telegram. But if you go to like, because it’s been banned from Telegram so many times. I went to the Tom Sewell Telegram, I typed in “Israel”. There was 43 results! Like the guy talks about, … Tom Sewell’s an anti-semite, Nazi! Obviously he’s anti-Israel.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about here is we know this and most people watching the stream know this, but I’m talking about the average capacity for understanding can only see in black or white. That’s why when you say socialism, we’re, …

 

Joel Davis: We’re talking about a guy, Eric Striker, who I have known for years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he could be just using that, …

 

Joel Davis: A National Socialist, who knows who I am, knows who Tom is, and has interacted with us on the Internet for many, many, many years. Right? He knows that he’s full of shit! And so he’s literally lying! And then trying to present us as if we are Zionists, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think he’s doing that? What’s the motivation?

 

Joel Davis: I think he’s doing it because I think he’s got an issue with us because we’re not pro-Russia, and he’s like a pro-Russia shill. And he has a personal issue with me and I think he has a personal issue with Tom.

 

So I think Tom insulted him at some point many years ago and I had a personal falling out many years ago. And so he’s putting personal petty bullshit and a difference of opinion on some other issue, which he may or may not be aligned with because he’s getting funding from a particular source or what have you, ahead of the so-called movement that apparently we’re both a part of undermining us and attacking us, Australian National Socialists.

 

And we just had a massive success. And we just had a huge propaganda and public relations success. The whole, like I saw the whole world was talking about what was happening on the March for Australia. It was a massive story! And we had done a lot of work kicking Zionists out. He said:

 

“Oh it was a Zionist rally because Paul Pauline Hanson marched in Brisbane (who shouldn’t even give a speech). And Bob Katter gave a speech in fucking Townsville.”

 

Who cares about the fucking Townsville march? No Zionist gave speeches in Sydney or Melbourne or any of the big major marches, that I’m aware of he’s presenting it like as if we went and like beat up communists to facilitate like big Zionist rally, which is disingenuous! We said from the beginning:

 

“We are going to secure this rally from all foreign influence. Zionist, Chinese, Russian, Palestinian, any foreign issue. That’s not the day for it. Today is the day for Australia!”

 

We do not have to make arrangements to not upset Palestinians in our own country when we’re rallying for our own country’s cause. They need to make arrangements to not upset us! They need to make arrangements to distance themselves from people attacking us. It is their obligation. They are the fucking visitors. This is our country! But they have no respect.

 

And so we are supposed to bend over backwards to care about the feelings of the pro-Palestine movement and Tom can’t say one thing in a speech that could be misinterpreted in a certain way? Where’s the Palestinians coming out and showing sympathy for the fact that people dressed up in Palestinian garb and beat up old men and old ladies for being Australian patriots? Where are they coming out and condemning this and trying to say:

 

“We’re not against the Australian people, we just fighting for our homeland against Israel.”

 

And Australia just recognised Palestine as a state, by the way. To say:

 

“Thank you, Australians aren’t the enemy!”

 

No! There’s a lot of anti-White elements in their movement that don’t give a shit about Australian patriots! Don’t give a about Australian nationalism! And they say:

 

“Always was, always will be!”

 

Align themselves with Aboriginals, align themselves with anti-White positions. And Eric Striker, the little faggot, wants us to bend over backwards to appease these anti-White invaders in our country, basically. Unwelcome guests. So you know fuck him!

 

Blair Cottrell: We’ve just breached the two hour mark and we don’t, …

 

Joel Davis: And also I will say this, he’ll call me out, he’ll talk shit publicly to my name publicly, right? Then Mark Collett, who’s a mutual friend of both of ours, says:

 

“Why don’t you guys do a debate? Why don’t you debate these two positions and work out who’s right or who’s wrong?”

 

And then he can’t even show up to a debate. Where’s the integrity? If you’re going to talk shit, let’s fucking debate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Was Mark going to mediate the debate?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

[1:59:37]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: The eternal, the eternal Libra. Keep everything fair. Look, I think the reason there seems to be more infighting on the Right sometimes or in nationalism is because there’s just bigger and more interesting personalities in nationalism. An individual personality is not discouraged like it is in communist circles. I think there’s just as much infighting in like far-Left groups. This is kept under wraps and they effectively bully each other into silence.

 

Whereas it’s harder to bully people on the Right because they’re kind of used to bullying and they’re used to standing up to it and maintaining their position in the face of it. There’s less infighting than there used to be. I can say that 10 years ago infighting on the Right was much worse. And you guys know me, I don’t really go for the whole Left, Right, political spectrum paradigm thing. I’m just using these terminologies because they mean something to you in order to be understood. A lot of Superchats, guys. And we’ve just breached, as I was saying, the two hour mark.

 

I hope the debate between Joel and is it Eric Striker? Eric Striker does happen, because I want to see Joel. I love to see Joel in a debate with someone who really doesn’t like him, because that’s where Joel shines, in my opinion. It’s very entertaining, so I hope it happens.

 

Joel Davis: There is a debate that I’m trying to line up at the moment with someone here in Australia who I think is, like a conservative, which is the kind I should be debating. I shouldn’t have to fucking debate people on my own fucking side, or supposedly on my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: At least people on your side will debate you because people on the other side don’t want to debate. They just want to, …

 

Joel Davis: Apparently, he’s on my side. He talks shit about me and he won’t even fucking debate me. I mean, it’s just pathetic! But he’s a little faggot! Like fuck him!

 

How’s It Going says:

 

“Hail NSN. Hail Tom Sewell. Hail Joel Davis. Hail Blair Cottrell. Hail Black Magic SS. Hail Victory!”

 

Black Magic SS is a band.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I wasn’t sure what that was.

 

Joel Davis: Nate Oz says:

 

“Thoughts on Sam from the Two Worlds Collide podcast making videos, talking about Sewell and shit talking about the NSN and saying his sources from the army claimed he was a coward and a fraud when he was serving.”

 

Yeah, well, that’s garbage! Two Worlds Collide, he’s part of a collective of influences that obviously is connected to the conservative establishment. And he was told to attack us because they tried to hijack Aug 31. They failed in doing so, and so now we’re, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you fill me on that? Who’s Two Worlds Collide Podcasts? And how does he know about Tom’s army service?

 

Joel Davis: He doesn’t know. Because he used to serve in the ADF.

 

Now, Tom, he was an infantryman. He wanted to go to Afghanistan at the time, or he was supposed to be deployed to Afghanistan a few times, and his whole, like, unit or company or whatever, the tour got cancelled and delayed. And then Tom, he’s told the story of the reasons why he left the army.

 

But the reason why he left the army was because of personal disputes he had with people. There was a idea that he’s a coward because he was sitting there waiting to go to Afghanistan, and then they cancelled the trip. It doesn’t really make any sense. He was ready to go. You know, Tom, he likes to have a fight. Obviously, Tom was depressed! There was, I think, two people that were in his unit that killed themselves because they cancelled the tour, because they were just so hyped to go and so depressed when they couldn’t go. People don’t join the infantry because they’re afraid of fighting. Like, you can join them [words unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I want to say. It’s antithetical to the truth! If there’s two things that Tom is not. It’s cowardly and fraudulent. That guy wears his heart on his sleeve. [chuckling] He does not tell lies! What he believes is written all over. He openly admits it, and he’s certainly not a coward! This guy will fight for what he believes and for his friends.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, Two Worlds Collide if you think Tom is such a coward, when he gets out of jail, why don’t you fucking get in the ring with him?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah, it’s pretty, … I think when you sit on a podcast and you call somebody else a coward and a fraud while they’re in prison after standing up for what they believe doesn’t that make you the coward?

 

Joel Davis: Well, to be fair, he. I think he made the video before August 31st. He was reacting to Tom’s speech at nationals. But nevertheless, if you think he’s a coward when don’t you get in the ring with him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Does he get an audience, this Two Worlds Collides guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he gets some views on Instagram.

 

But anyway, it was just a really retarded video. Like, his criticism of National Socialism was the that Hitler was on drugs and that he got the army to take drugs. You know, every army takes drugs. I thought you were in the army? Like, what are you talking about? And that’s the criticism. Like, you didn’t even bring up the “Holocaust” or some bullshit! He was just like:

 

“Hitler was on drugs. He’s a bad guy!”

 

[2:04:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, the entire political apparatus in Australia is on all sorts of drugs for their mental health, anxiety disorders. Does that make them an equally bad government? Well, it makes them much worse of a government than Hitler’s government, in my opinion. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, we won’t get into that. Let’s move on to the next. I don’t really care.

 

Joel Davis: Bitch666 said:

 

“Striker has soft hands.”

 

Presumably you’ve maybe met Striker in real life. He does seem like a fat little bitch to me. How’s It Going says:

 

“Joel and Blair, you’re both an inspiration to the entire White world. Could Australia be a stronghold for the White race? How do you feel about Whites immigrating there to consolidate?”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s how it started.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I do believe that that’s what we’re fighting for. And I support White immigration of course, if you want to move to Australia and you want to come join the movement and you’re a White guy from overseas, you’re more than welcome to. Or girl. Especially if you’re a White girl from overseas, I think you’re even more welcome. Nate Oz said:

 

“Hey, Joel, did you see Paul Miller, Gypsy Crusader, talk about you and Tom on Jake Shield’s podcast? Would you ever have Paul on a podcast?”

 

I didn’t see that, but from what I’ve seen, I have seen him on Twitter saying positive things about us and I do appreciate that. I’ve never spoken to him before, but if he would like to do some kind of collaboration. Yeah, I’d be down. Of course. It could be fun. Do you know who Gypsy Crusader is, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Is he the guy with the kind of long hair that makes the, … What’s that, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s really famous for, like the Omegle videos where he’s like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Omegle. Yeah. Even though at first I used to think it was kind of just like vulgar shock value entertainment, I’ve seen the guy actually represent what he believes in and he’s fairly articulate. And so, yeah, I actually think he’s all right. I don’t know enough about the guy. You guys know me. I don’t know much about anyone. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I haven’t seen a huge amount of his content, but from, I mean, he seemed like he’s entertaining. And like you said, when he’s getting serious, seems to be pretty cozy.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can say this, he’s very American. He’s like, he’s very American. And by that I mean he’s got a certain bravado about him that us Australians don’t really have. We’re kind of a bit more cynical, sceptical down here. We’re not so willing to put ourselves out there all the time. And if we do, we do it in a way that’s like. We still somewhat reserved, but he’s just like he’s going hard. And I don’t know, like I think he’s good value. Is that his real name, is it Paul? I’m not sure.

 

Joel Davis: Paul Miller is his real name apparently.

 

But yeah, if he would like to do a podcast, of course. Peter Sims, 1488 says:

 

“Free Thomas Sewell! He didn’t do nothing!”

 

Ain’t that true? Oh, we gotta get you going on this Blair. Aussie Order 88 said:

 

“Based Blair calling everything gay lately. Hope your gift shopping went well.”

 

There was a Blair ranting about gift shopping. Let’s reprise this take because I think it’s quite a funny take.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it was just yesterday I was spending some time in shopping centre looking for a present. Present was for a good friend’s son. Now his son was having his first birthday so he’s still just a baby. And I’m walking around thinking:

 

“What do you buy a one year old baby?”

 

I feel like anything I buy the baby, like let’s say I wrap up a present, the baby’s probably just going to play with the wrappings more than the present that I get for him. He’s not going to understand the value of any gift. And then I’m starting to think like I can’t even think about what would make a baby happy. Then I realised I’ve been in this situation many times before! I can’t even think about what would make any individual happy because I’m never thinking about that. I’m thinking about community issues and the country [chuckling] and what’s coming in the future for the entire community and country. Like how satisfied one person is about getting a present. It’s only momentary satisfaction too that wears off in about 30 seconds. It’s like, why would I invest any time into thinking about that?

 

And I realised how annoying buying gifts is and how gay it is if you’re a man trying to buy a present for someone, even if it’s for your own girlfriend. It’s just like you can’t get into that small mindset where suddenly instead of thinking about what matters, you’re just thinking about the temporary 30 second long satisfaction and experience of happiness that you’re going to create for one individual. Like why would anyone care about that? I don’t know! It’s just I find gift buying really annoying [sp] and it puts it into perspective. It puts something into perspective for you too, doesn’t it? It makes you realise that that same female perspective, that crushed down, shrunken perspective about the individual’s happiness is one of the problems that we have at government level, isn’t it? Because all of these women are too concerned with how an individual immigrant might feel satisfied or personally happy with the fact they’re coming into Australia. And that makes the woman feel good about herself providing that kind of lifestyle to individuals.

 

And so that’s all that really matters. So long as the female government bureaucrats feel like good people for helping out individuals and making them momentarily happy. That basically seems to be the extent of our government’s thought process. And that needs to stop! Doesn’t it?

 

[2:10:25]

 

So I don’t know. That’s the whole experience that I had yesterday. But I chose a present for my mate’s one year old son. I got a bucket of, what did I get, a bucket of like little blocks that stuck on top of each other and you can make little structures out of them. So he can make bridges and you can make little houses and stuff. Because I don’t trust any books, children’s books these days. I’ve heard some horror stories about children’s books, so I didn’t want to risk that. And I thought he can do something physical, he can make little bridges! So hopefully he gets some enjoyment out of that.

 

But like I said, it was difficult to even, to even think about it. But hey, I’m glad you guys enjoyed the rant. I had [chuckling] a fair few people laugh at that. So no, it wasn’t Lego, it wasn’t Lego. It was little timber blocks, different colours. And it’s perfect for a little one year old who’s trying to work out shapes and fittings and stuff like that.

 

And actually it was recommended to me by a few people. So I didn’t really decide myself. Someone had to help me out of that problem. But it is interesting, isn’t it, how, I’m sort of just reiterating the point I made that all men do actually have a problem with thinking on in short term and small matters like that. But when it comes to taking care of another individual person, women are just better at it. Women are more geared for that than men are. And it’s almost cruel to expect that of a man. To expect a man to go out there and think of some miraculous, incredible gift or series of presents, to expect him to buy that, to like conceptualise of that and buy it for someone. It’s like you’re asking him to basically be a woman. You’re asking him to be gay! [chuckling]

 

So I think I’d like to see a culture where women handle the gift buying and men don’t really have to think about it.

 

Joel Davis: That’s basically what I do. I just kind of consult the woman on gifts, mostly when they’re for women and children. Like, if I was trying to buy you a gift, for example, would be slightly easier because I could just think about what’s some shit that I would like that you would also like or something. And I could probably think of something.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the thing is, if I’m gonna get someone a present that I would like, I’d get them I don’t know, something practical, like dishwashing detergent. Some, like, scrubbing brushes.

 

Joel Davis: Laundry detergent? Is that what I’m getting for fucking Christmas this year from you? Is it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s expensive stuff, man! Have you seen, like, good dishwashing detergent that doesn’t, like, wreck your dishes and stuff? It’s like, …

 

I would love to get that as a gift. If I opened up and if I put up a present and it was dishwashing detergent and a new, like, bucket and a mop, I’d be like:

 

“Great! Fantastic! I need this. I’m going to use this!”

 

Whereas if I get, like I don’t know, … What’s a present that a woman would buy you? Like, I don’t even know, man! I just want something that I can use is what I’m saying. If I’m gonna get a gift, I prefer not to get gifts, actually. It makes me feel awkward. I don’t want to be, … Because you know what? You know how people give you gifts? You know how people give you a present, and then they’re staring at you to see how you react?

 

Joel Davis: You’ve got to pretend like it’s awesome and shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: And you gotta act like you’re really happy about.

 

Joel Davis: Even if you get something that you like, you just kind of think about in your head. You don’t have a reaction. And then you got to be like:

 

“Oh!”

 

I don’t usually make a reaction. And then they kind of I notice that they look, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you guys imagine Joel getting a present? Like, even a present that he kind of likes? Can you imagine his reaction? Imagine the disappointment of Joel’s mother growing up, trying to make him happy with presents. He would have opened up every present on Christmas and just been like, … No, man, like, it’s annoying. You know how girls, like, meet each other on the street and they’re like:

 

“Oh, my God! I love you! You’re amazing!”

 

And it’s all an act. It’s all a fucking act! Like, when I see my friends on the street, I’m like:

 

“What’s going on?”

 

You know, it’s not that exciting just to see your friend on the street.

 

But you know what else is funny? After the girls put on that big fuss after seeing each other in public, they walk away bitching about each other, don’t they?:

 

“That fucking skank! I hate that bitch!”

 

Right? But then the men will insult each other to their faces. That’s like their way of greeting each other.

 

But then we’ll walk away thinking:

 

“Man, I love that guy. He’s a sick cunt!”

 

[chuckling] So it’s just this completely inverted reality that men and women exist in. It’s really interesting to explore. I find it interesting anyway.

 

[2:15:05]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But in summary, like, I just prefer to have an arrangement where it’s like, I don’t need to get you shit, you don’t need to get me shit, and I just get my own stuff, you know, personally. Yeah. When it comes to gifts I’m not great. You gotta try and get something. But that’s when I basically consult the woman. What are we getting the kid? You know?

 

Blair Cottrell: But someone’s saying I’m ungrateful. I’m definitely not ungrateful. Like when I ruptured my pec tendon, people sent me gifts, and it was really helpful. Collagen, supplements. I got a lot of help from people from that, and that was fantastic because that’s stuff I actually needed. Right. I was injured. But I mean when someone’s trying to give you a gift actually just to make themselves feel good because they want to see you get excited. And then if you don’t get excited, you’re letting the person down. And then they’re just like:

 

“Oh, you’re a prick!”

 

That’s not real gift giving. That’s just you being selfish. That’s like you just trying to spend some money and hand someone some bullshit and see their reaction so you can feel good about yourself. I don’t know. I’m not against giving gifts. I don’t really know how to finish this.

 

The way I’ll wrap it up is my family were farmers. Yeah. The Cottrells. Dairy farmers for generations in Australia. They’re cold, hard working people. I don’t know where my passion came from. Probably from my mother’s side. The rest of my family are just very rigid, cold people. And every birthday party they ever hosted, they always said on the invitation, “no presents please”. Because they were just like practical people. I think the reason my dad’s side of the family never wanted to receive presents is because they never wanted to give them either. And if you’ve received presents, then you’re later obliged to give presents as well. You know what I mean?

 

So we’re a “no present” kind of family. My family, the Cottrells.

 

Joel Davis: I guess we should probably wrap this subject up. What else we got here? Anything? Peter Sims sent $1 to:

 

“Go get yourself some dishwashing detergent.”

 

How much fucking dishwashing detergent are we gonna buy with a dollar? Are you a fucking cheap cunt?

 

Come on, you know. $1 worth of dishwashing detergent, please. Let me get like a little, …

 

Blair Cottrell: One of [chuckling] those novelty ones.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, jewish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Megawatts 80 sent through $2 saying:

 

“Superchats make the show go longer.”

 

Well, stop sending them, guys. Because I want to go. I want to go to the gym.

 

Joel Davis: If you send a Superchat now, fuck you! I’m not reading it. We are done! The show is over. Hail victory! Blood and honour! White power!

 

Blair Cottrell: He says as he clings, he says as he clings for that last Superchat, which comes through from Lion Cross. $50. He says:

 

“Right. Every cunt get Blair a scrubbing brush for Christmas!”

 

Do it, guys. I like to clean my house. I like a clean environment. And so if I’m getting gifts, I want it to be cleaning products. [chuckling] I’m a practical man.

 

 

All right, guys, good show. Thanks for joining us. Love your work. Thanks for the donations. We’ll see you guys when we see you, I guess. Keep you updated on the next show.

 

[2:18:18]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 79)

[Latest at the top]

jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’d like to see Joel and Striker debate. I follow and like both, but I do NOT understand the antipathy Striker seems to have toward the Australian NSN in general. American political dissidents seem to have a harder time getting their egos out of the way for the sake of building a movement, which is probably one reason why there is no real movement to speak of in America. That and the fact that the jew-occupied government has been waging war against right wing organizers for decades (another case of liberal democracy taking the absurd position of having to destroy democracy in order to allegedly save democracy). Those who want to be leaders need to step up the game and act like men capable of rational discourse. They don’t have to like each other, but they don’t have to snipe at each other either. Side note, I think Blair may have the beginnings of a stand up comedy act talking about the difference between men and women. Fucking funny.
1 likes

Report
Oz74
1 day ago
I think Charlie Kirk was a greater man than prophet Muhammad… I’ve watched all Charlie’s videos since about 2015-16…The leftist always turn to violence and avoid any discussion that doesn’t go along with their world views..The posts mocking Charlie Kirks death are sickening..I can’t believe people are that evil..
2 likes

Report
bobbytimms
1 day ago
Free sewell!
1 like

Report
RevolutionaryFrog
1 day ago
It’s time for you guys to get some intro music / clips. These videos just make it hard to watch sometimes with the dryness.
-2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’ll take things that don’t fucking matter for $500, Alex.
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please watch Kirk is a psyop, https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please I beg you stop buying into these “behavior modification “ psyops,like (((Fink))) from Blackrock said ..they will force behaviors https://rumble.com/v6z1iy2-warning-if-you-cheer-charlie-kirks-death-youre-a-domestic-terrorist-and-wil.html
0 likes

Report
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
Hi Joel, just watching you on Jake Shields show. You might want to watch this video and read the transcript. I have been leading the effort to remove the Australian government since 2008. Court room video: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomVideo Court room transcript: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomTranscript
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:49:55 Striker should tone down his absurd love of mohammedans and spend his time learning German. Hitler’s view on the Palestinians limited itself to pointing out the hypocrisy of jewish-administered Britain and the jew colony. Hitler spoke positively having some openness to violence in one’s ethics, like the mohammedan savages have, but he was not an advocate of Arabs other than that everyone should be separate and held to the same standard (to which no semite holds himself).
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:23:20 is there a jury trial for such charges in Oz, or is it decided by a judge alone?
0 likes

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
3 days ago
6 moths to 3 years, can’t go wrong with a few kg of Kinetic Sand. 2 year old, big bag of Mega Blocks. You can get them second hand. 3 year old, Leap Frog tablet computer. Simply look up the development miles stones for the age group, and get a toy that promotes the practice of those skills. Women are not very good at doing this. Dads are the ones that buy the presents that challenge the kids, which the kids find highly engaging.
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
4 days ago
The passport bros are breeding a new race in Asia. This Wasian race could serve as both information reconnaissance, and the foraging of alliances with other ethno-nationalist movements.
-1 like

Report
Seppl88
4 days ago
Communism is Jewish!
2 likes

Report
ForRealers
5 days ago
Yess!!! Please try and get Gypsy Crusader on the show – that would be epic!!
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
5 days ago
Oh my goodness please have Gypsy on! That guy is best!
1 like

Report
lengiles
5 days ago
Given that Kirk was starting to revise his position on Israel, I can’t help suspecting some form of Mossad involvement in his shooting. It wouldn’t be the first time they manipulated a deranged amateur into doing their dirty work for them. Also, the notable silence you mentioned from the conservative establishment, the lack of calls for Antifa to be banned. Makes me wonder if their puppet-masters advised them to leave Antifa alone.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
radi8wl
5 days ago
When people say things like ‘he was afraid ‘israel’ was going to kill him’ her meant jews but everyone is afraid to say jews so they use words like: antifa, communist, left, israel, Bolshevik, Illuminati, bankers etc. I thought you knew this stuff, but then you follow up that remark by saying it could be mossad but you’re sticking with antifa. THEY’RE THE SAME THING JOEL, JEWS FFS. If your censoring yourself then please admit it in the beginning so you don’t lead Whites astray and you’re a shitty Nazi fwiw. Hitler won bc he named the jew and they couldn’t hide, his problem was allowing 25‰’ers into nsdap, anyway I hope that’s all it is, otherwise I’m sensing some higher level neurolinguistic programming, I hope not but it would explain baphomet. Sorry but no normal people see a white baby eating tranny ‘god’ and want it forever tattooed on their beautiful White skin. It’s not edgy even to og ‘goth girls’ like me.
1 like

Report
radi8wl
5 days ago
C’mon Joel, are you really ignorant of the fact that antifa, ‘communist left’ (as if there’s a communist right) and israel all have 1 thing in common!? They’re jews run by criminal jew hq ‘israel’. If you think you’re ever going to find ‘evidence’ that mossad is guilty of anything you don’t understand the world we’re living in, and believing the ‘official story’ makes you sound gullible at best. Obv you’re trying to propagandize your followers towards antifa, but it’s jews pushing tranny, funding antifa and every other evil out there. The problem with you young WN is the jews have still infected ur brain with fear of ‘conspiracy theories’, conspiracies have been happening as soon as 3 humans existed, they happen every day. When someone calls you a conspiracy theorist it’s the same as calling you a racist or a nazi, you can substitute all those words with ‘SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP OR ELSE’. Otherwise we love Thomas Sewell wish he was in America, there’s no one else so far that understands the big picture. The practical and the metaphysical AND the conspiracies. You and Blair are doing your best for Tom and White’s so thanks for that, disclaimer: Blair is not part of any org (giggle) you know that’s not going to work I hope. May Jesus remove the veil from your eyes and protect you and bc he was the og ‘nazi’ fighting off the jews, while thor and odin were killing and raping other Whites. Baphomet is not a good look (speaking of antifa tranny jews and the gods they sacrifice White babies to). Hope you take that thoughtfully and with introspection. Much love from usa!
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/15/joel-davis-the-only-solution-to-antifascism-is-fascism-sep-14-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]
0 likes

Delete
1488Brother
5 days ago
Hit the fucking like button ffs
1 like

Report
1488Brother
5 days ago
It pisses me off this has 12k+ views
and only 355 likes as of now…
0 likes

Report
Angelalee0
5 days ago
The two finger “salute” has 2 meanings. Palm facing inward is a is highly “offensive” fck u and the palm facing outward is ” peace or victory”.. Anyway great livestream as always. Love the substance and also, fck Antifa
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 days ago
At this point, most of the governments of the West need to be declared terrorist organizations. It’s pretty terrible when you can’t even count on your own government to defend the rights of White people to exist. The cuckservatives and the kosher right in general will be swept into the dustbin of history. They should hope the sweeping is done by nazis who will simply push them to the side rather than the communists who will liquidate them and hose their remains off into the gutters of history.
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
And I wasn’t a fan of Charlie Kirk, especially him shilling for Israel. He didn’t deserve to me publicly executed for having opposite political opinion’s, the left is severely insane that it’s getting scary..
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
I believe the feds are backing up Antifa, I know that’s a bit far-fetched.
3 likes

Report
PlebbitorDestroyer
VerifiedSupporter+
6 days ago
Striker will never be a real woman
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
6 days ago
Your analysis is the 100% truth of this situation.
1 like

Report
beno668
6 days ago
I was just kicked from telegram chat and reported to moderators. Why are “fascist” moderators, who supposedly represent free speech channel, kicking allies such as myself?
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
chemicalfrogs001
6 days ago
anti ra is gh3y
1 like

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 check
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
What is the excuse for jailing him?
0 likes

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
donating for studio equipment and gear for you guise
3 likes

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
The Left has always been intertwined with violence, the Bolsheviks, Red Uprisings during the 1920s, Red Army Faction the list goes on. Hitler formed the SA to counter Communist violence as the State was unable to prevent it. Democracy can’t handle the fact that these psychos cannot be reasoned with. I agree with you guys.
1 like

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
If we had a just and stable Society then we would not National Socialism! It is the only Solution ,a true alternative to the Judeo-Ameriacan Empire, Liberal Democracy, Finance capital and Marxism.
1 like

Report
TVR_
6 days ago
Imagine gift giving in this economy
2 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
advocating for groups to be listed as terror groups is a 0 sum game, remember the greek golden dawn was listed as 1 when a member “did” something wrong so they couldnt take power after winning the election, eu has said they will annul the german election if afd win. its also a double standard that if a lib or labour or greens member did something untoward their organisation would not be held collectively responsible.
3 likes

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
6 days ago
I never watched Kirk, but it is fun to see clips of him hysterically asserting that SODOMY is conservative. Nobody would say Bill Clinton had conservative values, he was almost sacked for adultery. Now Judaeo-“christian” zionists say Trump the womanizer, adulterer and kiddy-fiddler is conservative… Even so, come Lord Jesus.
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
there is a kosher race going on to fill every white country with non white 3rd worlders because muh worker shortage, but in the next few years ai and robots will replace almost all workers, its almost like the jewbankers want a race war in all western countries and at the same time bring on ww3 while the western military is at its lowest point ever, allowing the west to lose and white amalek to be scrubbed from history once and for all. its ride or die time my fellow white folk.
1 like

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
jews use the white race as a surrogate for their sins so whites are blamed for their evil. national socialism is neither left or right, the whole left cheek, right cheek psy op with a kosher arsehole in the middle stick needs to end. kirk shooting shows how easy it is to shift folks that are pro freedom of speech into hate speech crusaders with “hurty words” against their dead “hero”. national socialists need to keep showing consistency in policy, something the kosher “right” lost while lining their pockets.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
every year jews will hold a ritual where they “put” their sins into live chickens and then march in the streets swinging the live chickens by their heads until they die and dumping them into the street. seems to me us whites are the chickens.
0 likes

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
Good response on the Erik Striker issue. When I heard Thomas say “the Palestinians” I assumed he misspoke and meant to say “the pro-palestine protesters.” I thought that was pretty obvious p.s. it’s a little disappointing to hear that the NSN leans more pro-ukraine over pro-russia considering Ukraine is a puppet of ZOG NATO (assuming that even is the stance of NSN maybe it’s not) but nevertheless it’s wrong of Erik to disavow you over that. Very stupid and wrong. Even though I personally lean pro-russia I am ultimately fully against that war bcos it’s just Whites killing each other senselessly and even more ultimately than that I am Australia first so the dumbest thing NatSocs can do is break apart their national movements over international issues. Disappointing in Erik that he can’t see past personal petty differences
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
I also acknowledge I can be completely misinformed about that war, maybe I should also lean pro-ukraine idk. nevertheless the idea that perspectives about events on the other side of the world should lead to breaking apart NatSocism movements is something I can’t back. White Unity is the number one priority. unlike the left, we can tolerate difference of opinion
1 like

Report
MisterXXXXX
1 week ago
moshe is a longwinded waffler
0 likes

Report
NotBabyHitler88
Supporter
1 week ago
I was promised Right Wing Death Squads
6 likes

Report
InReality33
1 week ago
Blair… stop countersignal concern posting Joel.
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
FLmetalhead
1 week ago
Totally Nice Day
5 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
1 week ago
Where the fuk is your black sheet
8 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Novgarods
1 week ago
how is he a coward? It takes alot of nerve to do that. He’ll be going to prison for the rest of his life
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motion937
1 week ago
Charlie was not just saying words. He was articulating ideas that the left does not like & he was winning the arguments against them. The issue of “words” was never the point. The left was losing on their ideas. That is what they hate. Their bullshit worldview was crumbling. That is why they called it hateful. Gas lighting nonstop. Because they were losing in the battlefield of ideas. What comes next is something they will hate even more. It will be a cathartic experience for everyone that is sick of their shit.
10 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
1 week ago
Heil the nsn
6 likes

Report
ResistenciaNS
1 week ago
TND.
14 likes

Report
MeanBeanComedy
1 week ago
Let the missus get presents for your mates’ kids! Gift-giving is fun between friends, since you can use your knowledge about that person to show you understand him and care about him. You can also use experience in a certain field. For example, I get my friends books they don’t even know they want, and I’m going to be getting my father a crossbow this year because his shoulder is too hurt to use a compound bow now. I like giving gifts sometimes!
3 likes

Report
somedude39
1 week ago
If this week taught me anything, it’s that no demographic is more keen on political assassinations than the swifties.
2 likes

Report
Kroninn
SubSupporter
1 week ago
Charlie Kirk was wearing a soft panel in his vest. they only stop pistol rounds(He was anticipating someone from thw crowd woild shoot him). The 30-06 round hit him in the chest, went through the Kevlar, traveled up his spine and exited through his neck.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1488Brother
5 days ago
He had no armor. You can see his nipples through his shirt in multiple pictures and videos from the event.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
We cannot coexist with these people. There is no talking it out. That is what Charlie was trying to do.
30 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
1 week ago
TND!
3 likes

Report
mickyrauz
1 week ago
5 adds in a row to watch this lol
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
henrybox
1 week ago
Do you have an adblock extension? I have Ublock origin lite
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EbeneezerYE24
1 week ago
You could also just use the Brave browser with its built in adblock.
1 like

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
They don’t ban antifa because “antifascism” is a creation of the winners of WWII.
16 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
jsmith980234
5 days ago
the jews were doing the antifascist schtick in 1930s Germany before Hitler and WW2. it’s just another iteration of that. the don’t ban it because it’s jewish.
4 likes

Report
OsoyoosKid
6 days ago
And we know who J are…!
0 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
We do need a strong man. Someone who has independent wealth, protection, and who has zero dirt that can be used against him. Someone impervious to Jews basically. Impervious to Jewish money and impervious to Jewish blackmail.
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GigaChud7
1 week ago
Well there are plenty lol, how do you think PF and White Australia perform so well? The issue is with the precedent of Charlie Kirk being murdered, whether or whether not the state had him killed, no doubt it’s open season on out leaders and financial backers.
0 likes

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
I think we should replace the word ‘antifascism’ with stupidity. Can’t reason with stupids.
8 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
Thank God here in America we have these couple of sentences, written on an obsolete piece of paper, that half the country despises…that’s what stands between our speech and these masses of rabid shitlibs. It was worth the head start on diversity. The right to bitch about it, and the right to be armed to the teeth. Depending if your state/county/city even recognizes constitutional rights. There are plenty which don’t. But I’d say…it’s a fair trade-off for the head start on diversity here in the states.
13 likes

Report
GrizzlyWhisker
1 week ago
I would love to send Tom an email while he’s in jail if it’s not a convoluted process that requires doxxing myself. I’m still not totally sure where to find the link but I’ll look around the Telegram.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003
2 likes

Report
Australian_Terra
1 week ago
The government already knows who you are.
1 like

Report
dcbyers13
1 week ago
Thank you both for your leadership. White Australia is quickly becoming the model for the rest of the white world.
47 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Reflections on the March for Australia – Sep 7, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/08/joel-davis-reflections-on-the-march-for-australia-sep-7-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell reflect on the recent successful March for Australia in major cities that drew at least 100,000 people. Also Tom Sewell’s (NSN leader) arrest as a result of the clash with leftists and communists at the so-called “Camp Sovereign” abo squatter encampment in a nearby park, that was being used as staging ground for attacks on Aussie marchers. And more, … – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 18,272 – Duration: 114 mins]
3 likes

===================

 

Odyssee Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 195)

HyperChat minimum:
$0.01
pius
11 hours ago
I’ve said this, whites need to get mean.

pius
13 hours ago
Fascism is seizing control of the state and pushing the left out of the political process . If it’s either your dictatorship or ours, if we’re going to have left wing authoritarianism or right wing authoritarianism, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism.
This just sounds like politics. I’m not sure why it even has to have the name fascism

Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
gift-giving
is an exercise in empathy. A heartfelt gift boils down to realizing what the other person would appreciate. narcissists have trouble with it. because they never really listen to what other people say (unless the topic is perceived as concerning their own interests)

danzimmons
3 days ago
Yes just like in the yookay, trying to save the children from porn lol as they pay the most degenerate homosexual tranni’s in kindergarten’s as well as their porno’s. Fuck those sellout anti White leaders

4
0
Green
5 days ago
Brilliant sarcasm by Blair at
10:00
.

4
0

@katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk.
– KATANA]
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]

elfoffgazza
5 days ago
Gypsy Crusader isn’t even White, he’s half Romani

2
0

@clintwayne
6 days ago
Eric Striker has nothing good to say about other ns groups, it time for him to grow up a realise the movement is far far bigger
than him and his over inflated ego.

4
0
King Tut
6 days ago(edited)
fuck Eric Striker, and Mike Jewnoch! they luv muslim cock. those 2 are THE most annoying guests on PWR show. Mike is the #1 reason why I could never get into TRS, and the entire NJP was very pro Islam. Warren Balough even bought Islamic merch of some muslim group that fight the Jews in the ME and promoted them on his show. but at least Warren is someone I can listen to and enjoy his inisights.
Mark is way too nice. it took him over 1 YEAR to depart with Jason Cohen. even after half his followers kept complaining about Jason, it took a huge scandal to kick Jason off the show cuz he flat out said we shouldn’t criticize or even mention Jews cuz it’s bad optics. and afterwards Jason TALKS SHIT ABOUT MARK ON HIS OWN SHOW!! this is after all the free promotions Mark gave Jason on PWR.

9
2
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
Odysee’s Warstrike channel muted me hours after I commented that “striker” counter-signaling NSN was sus. I only watched for Warren’s stories anyway.

3
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Hitlers Definition of Socialism
“A socialist is the one serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti property ; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency ; true socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of his community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” Adolf Hitler December 28th 1938.

12
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Fascism was a movement to save Europe from communism. Though thanks to today’s media almost everyone thinks that fascism is something horrible.
Of Italian fascism Churchill said “Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces which can rally the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilised society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism.”
Fascism in short is a defender of the nation, culture and people.

7
0
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
It was the European response to the Red Menace

Great Expectations
6 days ago
The are “violent communist terrorists” they are not “Anti-Fascist”

2
0
Hateful Yarn
6 days ago(edited)
33:00
yeah the narrative on reddit is that the shooter was a groyper or some alt light cuck. They’re not even talking about his trøøn boyfriend. No one is talking about that but us.

3
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
o//

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
o/

4
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
o/

4
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I am opposite I like to give presents but not receive them

5
0
Reginald Collett
7 days ago
Have you ever seen the paul hogan show?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
A spade great gift

2
0
WayTruthLight
7 days ago
TheHolyNewTestament Word rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more than anything else does, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. This isn’t rocket physics.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a mop

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
Lego ?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Why does the Palestinians and all the Muslims go and fight the Jews in Israel for the sandpit

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
I have no problem with Palestinians and Muslims if they go back to their own countries and stay there

3
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
Warstrike is so gay. Getting drunk, smoking, & praising superchats.

5
2

@EverybodywakeUp
7 days ago
Ricky Hattons died.

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Joel you are right o/

4
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
What benefits WHITE people have we had being Pro Palestine over the years no support.

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
bye brother

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NSN have done great

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
The BNP tried this joining up with Muslims and Palestine groups it doesn’t work they are Anti-white

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
seen gfro afar it didn’t look like there were vere many Arabs there

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Free Tomas Sewell

14
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
meanwhile don’t dare question Jewish history

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
HIT THAT FIRE BUTTON EVERYONE

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t let commie infiltrators take over the chat.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I’m gonna head out, y’all take it easy o/

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
free son of enos

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was even better

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Free Mr Bond

5
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
how long has it been now

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1967025836730835219

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
when we win we’ll make video games with Jew zombies

@SorenX
7 days ago
thanks

WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
https://entropystream.live/mobile/joeldavis

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
I thought it was great brother I will put up another one o/

@SorenX
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
are you joking? i see no link to entropy in the details?

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nazi zombies would be cool, we could unleash them on antifa at one of their protest

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was great , Avi is scum

2
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
try the entropy link

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
get racist or go extinct

7
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Indians are so disgusting

3
0

@SorenX
7 days ago

@joeldavis
is this on another tube site like rumble? odysee has a shitty bitcoin payment system i cant use

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
you beat me 2 it

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they are fringe and cringe

WaffleStake
7 days ago
fringe and cringe

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1966933551787774236

SovereignSaint
7 days ago
shiiiiiit

WaffleStake
7 days ago
the Joel Jamal rally

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
adelaide is getting taken over by pajeets

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
europa the last battle opened my eyes heavily recommend!

6
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
pretty sure everyone this side of the internet has seen it.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
yep he’s a kike

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
NeoNazi? We don’t call it that, call it what it is, say the whole thing

WaffleStake
7 days ago
if you’re a cop you’re a public figure to some degree

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
How is he sucking off jews?

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are a jew commie

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
leftie shit

@43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are the bitch

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
BAN 43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
go somewhere else

Euroic
7 days ago
But Joel, so are muslims.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they hate us cuz they anus

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Euroic
they will they hate each other more than they hate us

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
there we go Joel keep naming them

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Dave Lee was debating this non white immigrant this afternoon and pretty much she was a living example of the globohomo slave race and she couldn’t see it

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
I hope non-Whites do fight each other

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
who will fight each other

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
also there will be too many different groups

Euroic
7 days ago
Weimar Germany was not being flooded with millions of brown 3rd world subhumans. Our situation is far worse demographically.

10
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
the slave race is the ultimate goal

5
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a ponsy scheme

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
are Australians not able to say Jew anymore?

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
^^

Euroic
7 days ago
I wish Germany had won WW2

9
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NS is against parasitism , parasitism from above (the financial system )

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists hate the White working class the most.

6
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
private property, but even the richest man or largest company are not more important than the nation

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
We have to limit the financial system

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
you need to understand what democracy is – its a ratcheting system. The left comes in, advances satanic jewish ideas, the right comes in and normalises it “gay marriage is conservative”. They do this over and over.

3
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
They both agree on open borders too

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
They are basically on the same side. They are both anti-White.

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
Pretty much

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Fuck conservatism, they sided with the communists in WW2

4
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
conservatism is dead. with the death of charlie kirk, hopefully more people realize how useless it is. time for something else.

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes its really that simple. The “right” that win elections are likewise comprimised

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
conservatives are lefties

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
There ultimate goal is total White extinction. If you want to survive become a racial nationalist. Be racist or go extinct.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
He won’t do it because all of his grandchildren are jewish

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Yes

scoobyburn
7 days ago
O/ :illuminati_2: separation

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
That’s what they do when you become a liability to them, they hate all gentiles even if you bow down to them, they’ll still kill you if you step out of line just a little bit

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Some of the left say killing this man now is like killing hitler in 1932. That is where their minds are. How often have you heard that “if you had a time machine whats the first thing you would do?” – they always say go back in time to kill baby hitler. This is who they are

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
resistance is coming

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Kirk sucked Israel’s dick and still got shot.

4
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Who cares who did it, who benefits from it – lets make it us.

Euroic
7 days ago
The mainstream media told her its safe to be around niggers.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheBuckBreaker
This is exactly it. One of my modules was on the gender pay gap. The amount of jewish authors I had to reference was unbelievable.

Minister of Memes
7 days ago
They even had a module of anti-white abo propaganda in my Diploma of Accounting at TAFE. The vaguely named class was called “making decisions in a legal context”.

@Evola19
7 days ago
Young people also want to conform and in such a place they inevitably come out believing these dysgenic ideas

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes I have studied in higher education and this was my experience. Ideological brainwashing. Soviets used to make dissidents in the camps write pro-soviet works as a way to self brainwash, that is what universities do today. The kids brainwash themselves doing the work

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Hail Hitler o/

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yes that is true, “left” is too broad a term really

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
You guys better be carful talking shit about antifa and calling them terrorist, Striker and the TRS gang might call you whitetoids and sic their Arab donors on you guys

2
1
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Evola19
I think there are degrees of leftism ,this extreme maybe 5-10 % but some kind of leftie maybe 30 -40%

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists and mudsharks

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
suicidal empathy is part of our make up

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
lots

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
How many whites are left wing? How bad is it as a percentage

Euroic
7 days ago
Self-hating white leftist scum

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I heard the shooter had a tranny GF

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The life of one insect has more value than the lives of all left-wingers on earth combined.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The main issue is the right taking money from Israel and being pro-Israel.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
They would kill us

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Most likely

@Evola19
7 days ago
It just supresses them for a few years

@Evola19
7 days ago
They can list it as a terrorist organisation but another will be made called something else

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
Even if that was true that was never going to happen

@Evola19
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
Indeed

Euroic
7 days ago
Cuckservatives

1
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
back in the day, Obama was contemplating listing antifa as a terrorist organisation iirc

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Same with Charlie Kirk being assassinated, we know damn well Israel did it

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
antifa Jews same shit

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The Kosha Right

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Everyone knows 9/11 was Israel. Who benefits is the only question you need to ask.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nothing proves that jews did 9/11 other then dancing Israelis but we still blame Israel

Euroic
7 days ago
Antifa are terrorists but they won’t be outlawed because the serve the regime.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
The far left is a tool of Israel, anything they do is in the interest of Israel

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists are the ideological slaves of the regime. antifa want whatever their globalist masters tell them to want.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
When rittenhouse shot “Antifa” how many were jewish Joel

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I blame Israel and the far left

@Evola19
7 days ago
There is a lot of evidence are you not looking

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Israel itself is the global capital of pedophilia, tel aviv is the gayest city on earth, Isreal is the main manufacturer of hormone drugs for transgenderism – Israel is the literal throne of Satan on this earth.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t send your kids to school

@Evola19
7 days ago
feminism, multi-culturalism, transgenderism, homosexuality – all pushed by jews

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The left are so extreme and genocidal because they are led by jews. Everything left wing from female voting to civil rights is purely jewish led

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
By deception we shall do war

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Soon as it happened the first thing Netanyahu said was “Israel didn’t do this”

@Evola19
7 days ago
Netanyahu tweeted “He was murdered for speaking the truth”, yeah no shit.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Yep

@Evola19
7 days ago
Kirk was getting off script

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
The jewish guy arrested shouting “shoot me” then being released later and Netanyahu tweeting within minutes of the kill tells you who did it.

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Edward Dutton is right about these people

@Evola19
7 days ago
He was not one of ours

@Evola19
7 days ago
I had never heard about this guy until he was shot. That is why I have not fallen for the propaganda that “he was one of us” just because he had 2 blonde children, white skin and a wife. He was a traitor to his people. He was coming round sure, but he spent years shilling for jews and punching right

@Evola19
7 days ago
lol

@Evola19
7 days ago
This is why you dont make deals with the devil

@Evola19
7 days ago
The wages of sin are death. If you take money from jews to shill for Israel then start turning on them this is your reward

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
r

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
e

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
i

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
N

@Argo
7 days ago
tnd

@Argo
7 days ago
you’re on

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
now it is

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
it’s not letting me watch

0
0
==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript