Thomas Sewell: Alrighty, we’re live. Max volume, everything. Audio input, capture.

 

All right, testing, 1, 2, 3. Use my big boy voice. Volume’s low. What’s your problem? I actually found a setting. Everyone’s like, Tom, fix your settings. We’re going 150%. There we go. Alrighty. Alrighty. Testing, testing!

 

All right, obligatory, free Joel Davis! Free Brandon [Koschel]! Free Jim Roberts!

 

So I’m going to cover a few subjects today, as you expect, with a solo stream. I really enjoyed my most recent stream with James Mason. It was like a five hour don’t Fed post challenge hard. He Fed posted a couple times, but as you’d expect. But I reviewed it and it wouldn’t breach. It wouldn’t breach even the most ridiculous laws we have here in Australia.

 

Now, one thing that I need to correct from the stream is I think I said that the book Siege is in a grey area of the law. My lawyer has told me that it is potentially banned. So he was like, it’s kind of in a dark grey area of the law. It’s not 100% banned. There is a banned list of books in Australia and Siege isn’t on it. But I cannot encourage anyone to go and buy that book because they haven’t made the case yet.

 

But what he suggests is that they’re trying to make the case. So I’d be very careful with that book in Australia. That’s one thing I want to clarify. Yeah, I think Mason gave a pretty sound explanation of what his intention of the book is. And I’m surprised that there hasn’t been any negative press because I know the journalists will watch a stream like that and get their AI ready to write an article for them about how evil we all are. But, yeah, that hasn’t happened.

 

But I do want to give people caution here in Australia that, yeah, I’m not encouraging you on legal grounds. I’m not encouraging you to read the book.

 

And I think all I said in the stream was that I did read it back in 2019 after being bullied by Jacob Hersant into reading it. I originally didn’t read it because I thought it was what everyone says it is. And I was like:

 

“I’m not really interested in that. I know enough about X, Y and Z through reading army manuals when I was in the army, so I don’t feel the need to read something of that nature.”

 

And then Jacob was like:

 

“No, it’s. That’s not what it’s about at all! There’s like some contentious lines in it. But overall, that’s not what it says.”

 

And Mason clarified that on stream. And I do appreciate him doing that because I think siege culture and accelerationist culture is really misunderstood. You know, accelerationism as a concept is, and siege as a concept is really misunderstood. And you’ll notice when I said to Mason about how our strategy has been to do the maximal amount of work with the minimal amount of damage, you’ll notice he was nodding the most. Mason’s not advocating for anyone to be an idiot and go to jail. He’s actually advocating the opposite. He’s saying:

 

“Do as much as you can to the integrity of the system without ruining your life!”

 

And he is proof that he’s done 60 years in the struggle. 60 years of inspiring people to be like:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this system is evil and corrupt and contributing to it and trying to seek entry into it in hopes to change it is not an effective strategy.”

 

And he’s always been an advocate of the opposite. To siege it, to besiege it, to starve it. And yeah there’s no point, you know, running at it, doing a hero run, you know, charging at the castle walls, you’re just going to get pinged by some dude with an arrow. You’ve got to just wait it out, you’ve got to siege it, not wait it out and do nothing. But there’s a lot of things you can do while besieging an enemy.

 

And so people have to think creatively about what that means. And not but again, all politics, all politics, when it is in its infancy, attracts radical people. And radical people are more prone to self destructive behaviour. And so you want to have people that are courageous, you want to have courageous men, you want to have courageous leaders. And courageous does not mean foolish!

 

And so you do have to balance the concepts of bravery and courage with patience. And there’s a lot of virtue, a lot of virtue in having the strength to put yourself against a system that’s destroying you without becoming a martyr, you know, without letting the system destroy you. Now if you step over that line and the system puts you in jail for life or you get assassinated, like George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

I mean, Matt Hale, for example, who was involved, my understanding, with the creativity movement, he wasn’t the founder, but he was like the young hotshot that was rising up. And I think he’s in jail for life. I think he gets out of jail in about 10 years time from now. And he’s been in jail for like 20 years. Guys like Matt Howell, for example, just got really unlucky. They got. He got really unlucky and he got caught up in something that he hadn’t. I’ve looked at the case, I’ve looked at the case, the facts of the case, and the guy hasn’t done anything wrong. They could just. He was just a serious threat to the system and something like that could happen to me. But God willing, I’m safe from that level of corruption!

 

[07:42]

 

And I think it might be good luck, it might just be good luck! It might be destiny. But you don’t, what is it? You don’t count your chickens until they come home to roost or something? It’s still early days. It’s very early days. I’m still a young man. I might be bald, but I’m young and fit.

 

So, yeah, it’s, I’m 33 years old this year as of this month. And yeah, there’s a lot of struggle to go.

 

Just open with that if you haven’t checked it out, don’t be intimidated by the fact that it’s five hours. It is broken down into separate conversations. There’s an hour and then there’s a break and then there was meant to be an another hour and a break. But it, the first hour, the first two hours is very consumable for most people.

 

And then obviously, if you’re really into this stuff and you go for long drives and, or you work a job where you can have a, your headphones in a lot of tradies and stuff. Tell me that they like the five hour streams. Don’t be intimidated by having these really long streams. They appreciate, they appreciate the dialogue.

 

So as long as not too often. I don’t think you should listen to streams every day and I don’t think you should listen to music every day. I have been doing a fair bit of community service. I got to do knitting, as you’re all aware, and I advise people not to, I listen to music sometimes the whole time, or a podcast or an audio book. Books are probably the best thing. Books are better than streams because books, streams and dialogue and conversations aren’t as sharp. There’s no way I can communicate with you as clearly and as sharply as, say, reading Mein Kampf on audiobook. It’s not possible because of all the jargon. Those are the clearest thoughts possible. And then they go through an editing process.

 

So where are we? So already in the chat. Already in the chat! They’re arguing about Christianity already. Instantly! It’s incredible! Christianity will come up in this stream. When we talk about Manosphere, we’re going to cover feminism in general. We’re going to talk about all this girl bossing that’s going on at the moment with the Evangelicals. And there’s some heinous stuff that I’ve seen on Twitter where these little soy boy freaks are marrying these goblina jewesses with like 100 body counts. And they’re just saying:

 

“But she’s saved by Christ!”

 

And so it will come up. The conversation will come up. When we’re talking about that. There is definitely part one of this stream. What I’m going to open with is I’ll just. People still saying the volume’s low. Let me just unmute myself. Hold on. Now we’re. I could put up 175. I’ll just go 200. I’ll go 200. Okay. People still complaining. 200%. 200% Audio input, capture, volume. And the mic is like an inch from my face, maybe two. Two inches. Audio input, capture. I’ll put this one at 150. Alrighty. How does that sound? Testing for the last time. Testing. Yeah, fair enough. It is pretty quiet. Yeah, there’s a lot of retards in the chat today. Classic. Everyone’s spurging out. Yeah, that does sound better.

 

All right, sweet. Everyone’s arguing over which strain of Christianity. It’s incredible! It’s incredible! It’s endless. It’s endless, isn’t it? It never ends. It never ends.

 

So to start with the Aboriginal question. So obviously we are still what I am, and I have friends and we are trying to get a political party on the table here in Australia. And so covering the Aboriginal question, and you could call it the woman question, is really important. And it has to be done in a way that’s legal because of these laws here in Australia. And it has to be done in a way that people can understand the values and the rhetoric without getting caught up in the emotional arguments. So one has to be cautious when they approach these two topics. So you might find my speech slightly more refined than normal.

 

Hitler won the female vote in Germany. He actually had more women vote for him than men. And that’s a really interesting phenomenon to consider that more women voted for Hitler than men.

 

And so it shows that women don’t have to necessarily like you in order to respect you and I think that’s an important dynamic. A lot of people have commented, including Mason, about how journalists have behaved, female journalists specifically have behaved when interviewing me. And I saw someone online describe it as “negative tingles”, that they’re not used to someone outside the court giving them negative tingles. Normally it’s boring. Normally their job is boring. And then to have someone that’s got an intense character and an intense personality, it hits the dopamine receptors differently. And I’ve seen grandmas on Facebook comment sections in replies to these interviews saying, “hail Australia”. And all the criticism and all the advice people try to give us over the years is all wrong. It’s all backwards. It’s actually all the other way around. The female question is the opposite of the current orthodoxy, the current belief system of how women should be treated and how politics affects women. It’s all wrong. It’s all an inversion of the truth!

 

The truth is that it comes down to respect! And they respect integrity, not niceties! They don’t respect niceties, they respect integrity. And they respect aggression as long as it’s a as long as it’s not a foolish, foaming at the mouth, barbaric aggression. They don’t have much respect for that, but they almost respect that more and get better tingles from that than Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese. These characters provide no stimulation to the female political psyche. And so understanding how to win the woman vote, you’re not going to win it with outright misogyny. That’s obviously ridiculous! This idea of just be a prick and you’ll get voted in. That’s not what I’m articulating.

 

[16:04]

 

What I’m saying is that people should not continue to spread the lie and demoralisation within our broader scene, our broader movement and political parties in the West, that the way to win the woman vote is to pander to them. That’s really what this comes down to, is the pandering.

 

So that’s a subject on its own that I’ll cover. So that’s what you got to look forward to.

 

But first we’re going to talk about the Aboriginal question and specific. We’ve talked about both these questions a lot, but the reason why it’s come up again is I’ve had a lot of people in person and online message me saying:

 

“Why is our strategy to go to war with Aboriginals? Won’t we win more votes and won’t we do better in Parliament and won’t our message be more well received if we don’t go to war?”

 

These are their words, not mine, with Aboriginals. And my position is not that we’re going to war with Aboriginals.

 

And obviously the Camp Sovereignty situation has played a part in this dialogue because people think that the reason why there’s allegedly an incident on that hill was because of the Aboriginal question. And it’s completely it’s not irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant, but people are conflating and the media has done this. The media has purposefully misled people and made a significant portion of people that support us question their support on the basis of:

 

“Well, why would they attack innocent elderly Aboriginal women?”

 

And most people can see through it. But there is a portion of our supporters that are like:

 

“Oh, I don’t think that was a good move. You probably shouldn’t have attacked innocent elderly Aboriginal women.”

 

And it’s, well, one, that didn’t happen and two, the conflict., … And this is the position that interestingly, a lot of Aboriginals actually share, not all, but a lot, is that the issue is these White traitors.

 

And so if these White traitors didn’t behave the way they did, there wouldn’t be as much conflict between the Whites and the Aboriginals. And you’ll find there’s a lot of, probably a higher percentage of Aboriginal DNA Aboriginals that aren’t supportive of multiculturalism. And there is, the Left call it like an Uncle Tom syndrome, obviously. But my position has always been towards all races that it’s about respect. And it’s a zero sum game a lot of the time regarding resources and living space. That’s zero sum.

 

And so there’s going to have to be compromise or there’s going to be if there’s not some sort of what I’ve always said about the question of re-migration is people bring up the Aboriginals, whenever you talk about re-migration they say:

 

“Oh, but what about the Aboriginals? They were here before you!”

 

So because of that, they’re in their own select category. And what I’ve been trying to explain to people online is that Aboriginals have a choice. And this is the sound bite and this is what you should be saying to if I know a lot of people have an Aboriginal friend, or a part Aboriginal friend, this is what you say to them:

 

“Our position is that you either have part sovereignty over the whole or over full sovereignty over the part. But you can’t have both.”

 

I’ll explain that again. The Aboriginal people can either have part sovereignty over all, or full sovereignty over part. They can’t have both! That’s not a compromise. That’s White genocide. So White people, Anglo, Celtic people predominantly have come to this continent because the continent wasn’t a country, or a nation, it was a continent. It’s a land mass. It’s an island, a big island.

 

But we’ve come to this place. There’s a whole bunch of warring Aboriginal tribes. Some are in cahoots and some aren’t in cahoots. Some have been here 10,000 years. Some have potentially been here 40,000 years. The numbers keep changing. But either way, we came here and we built something separate to them. We tried to include them. There’s a lot of interesting history from the first and Second Fleet and from Arthur and Bligh, Philip. There’s some interesting history where they’ve tried to integrate the Aboriginals and it’s almost always backfired horribly on both the Whites and on the Aboriginals.

 

And so when you look at and Auspill’s done a very good job at covering this, when there has been massacres of Aboriginals, so-called these genocides or massacres, it’s always come down to establishing the Anglo Saxon law on the land. It’s come down to:

 

“Hey, we want this land, we want this territory. We’re bigger and stronger than you. We’re not going to come after you, we’re not going to attack you. But we want this much space. And, it’s living space for Whites. Europe has to breathe out. We’re overcrowded in the streets of London. We’ve got this problem with criminals or petty criminality, people stealing Spoons and stuff. We’re running out of space. We found this place. We’re in a geopolitical issue with all these other people. We can’t explain this to you. We just need what we, what we need. And we’re prepared to fight for it! And your options are to fight us or to just keep moving deeper and deeper into the bush and away from this spot. It’s ours now. You’re not having it back.”

 

[22:11]

 

And obviously anyone in their right mind would be pissed off by that. If some alien force came, you know, from space and did that to us right now and we had really little ability to fight back because they were so technologically advanced, we would rightfully be pissed off, wouldn’t we? But we would have to retreat into the bush, we would have to White flight. We would have to be like, this is too much. We have to consolidate what we’re doing.

 

And so this is beyond Good and Evil. This is a, this is Nietzschean in this concept. The Left try to put a moral framework on that and say:

 

“That’s wrong, that’s evil. And therefore we have to surrender Australia to everyone! We have to be cucks, we have to bend over and we have to let anyone come here and rape us because of this founding moment!”

 

Because White people equals bad as their moral framework. That is their entire moral framework. White people equals bad. And they’ve got this original sin concept:

 

“We’re bad people! We’re horrible people! We’re horrible, bad people!”

 

Now, obviously straight White men don’t think this way. The only people that think this way are people with slave morality, which is homosexuals, freaks, a lot of women unfortunately think this way:

 

“Oh, no, we’re horrible! What we’ve done is so horrible!”

 

You know, this kind of bleeding heart. Not all women, but it is a naturally, it is a feminine energy to put your empathy for others. Well, it’s not even a, it’s a distortion of feminine energy really.

 

But look, it appeals, it appeals to weak willed people. Masculine men don’t think like this. Testosterone doesn’t allow your brain to even go there. We’ve got a completely different philosophical structure, a completely different reality because we’ve got a solar morality. It really comes down to these simple principles. It’s not about good and evil, it’s about solar morality. It’s about, we are a life form, we must exist, we must continue to exist. We don’t have to be pricks about it, we don’t have to be cunts about it. But we’re not going to back down, we’re not going to surrender, we’re not going to roll over and die. And so how do we make this work?

 

And so obviously, while we’re in a nice friendly talking phase about it, I don’t have an issue with Aboriginal sovereignty. It’s not my issue. I don’t. Good on them, Good for them. That’s my position on the Aboriginals. Good for them! If they can have it, good on them.

 

But it’s got nothing to do with me. I’m not paying for it, I’m not engaged in it, I’m not involved in it. It’s not in my face, it’s not in my place, it’s not in my space. It’s in their space. Now that is the problem! That is the problem is that multiculturalism is forcing all these radically different people to live together. And we’re not meant to live that is going to be the death of us. It’s going to be the death of our culture.

 

Now these people, they have a flag, they have a tribe, they have an identity. They’re trying to rebuild their culture. Good on them. My opinion, and I think the opinion of most Aboriginals and most White people is that they should do it on their own! I think they’ve had enough help. We’ve done enough to help them, more than enough to help them. It’s not our responsibility to help them any further.

 

What part of the land are they going to get? Well, that is the most serious conversation. But the philosophy behind that conversation I think is congruent. I think we can, I think all Australians can get on board with the idea that we have a two-state solution, at a minimum. To me, that’s the minimum. If they want to go to war with us, that’s a different conversation.

 

But I think you’ll find that there could be conversations where they have their own government, they have their own schools, they have their own institutions. Are they going to be as good as ours? No, they’re not. Is that going to cause the bleeding hearts to be like:

 

“See we’re still continuing to oppress them by keeping them separate!”

 

And there’ll be an anti-apartheid argument, but apartheid is the most beneficial thing for both parties. Because they will never have dignity, they will never have sovereignty and they will never have dignity while we play this passive aggressive game where they’re trying to rule over us and we’re trying to say we’re all friends, Kumbaya. That is never, while both of us are actually suffering. So I’ve said in the past things like if they want to, if they want to fight, they might get deported too. They’ll get deported back to India. They walked here 40,000 years ago. They might get told to walk back.

 

And I’ve said things like those are very strong comments and obviously a lot of Aboriginal people want to fight me because of those comments.

 

But that is my position. I’m not backing down on that. I’m never going to change my mind on that is my position. It’s a two-state solution or it’s that because we cannot continue. And when we take power in this country, and we are going to take power in this country, we are going to solve this question and we are going to say:

 

“Let’s sit down, let’s draw up the map and here is a fundamental treaty of you will not let China put bases on your land, you will not let any foreigners put bases on your land, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Like there will be a treaty that will say:

 

“You are a vassal of our realm. This is Australdom, this is our realm, you’re a vassal, you’ve got a territory, you self govern it.”

 

Whether we trade or buy or sell or communicate with each other, whether there’s tourist visas, all this is downstream. We can work something out where they can come visit us and we can go visit them.

 

[28:08]

 

The bleeding hearts can go live with the Aboriginals. But you will not put Chinese bases on it. Like this is fortress Australia. We’re not going to tolerate it and you guys can police yourselves. You can have your own laws, you can have your own courts, you can have your own koori justice and your own jails and your own prisons, and all the complaints that they have all solved overnight. All solved overnight. We have nothing to do with it. We have nothing to do with it. We have no part of it! You want to go spear each other, that’s your culture. That we’re not going to intervene. And that is the absolute best outcome for everyone involved! That it’s the best compromise for us. Certainly it’s the best compromise. Is it perfect? Is it ideal? Can we purity spiral and get a better result? Sure, absolutely!

 

Is that feasible? Of course, anything is feasible if you put your mind to it. Is that how the Australian public feel? No, the Australian public don’t feel that there could be something more than that. There might be people that want to do more than that and go further, certainly. And that ethnic tension arises from living together. But I think once you find, once you take that step in that direction, I think you will find that tension will disappear.

 

So when people say to me:

 

“Tom you know why are we doing this? Anti Aboriginal rhetoric and da, da and we should try to win the Aboriginals over and we should., …”

 

The way they’re talking is they’re treating Aboriginals the same way. They’re like:

 

“We should try to win women over. We should try to win!”

 

It’s kind of similar to attitude. It’s like that’s not how it works. You don’t win Aboriginals over by pandering to them. You don’t win women over by pandering to them. I know they’re two very different biological forms. You know, obviously one is male and female. One is just female. You know, when we’re talking about women, we’re talking about White women, obviously. And I’m not making any further comparisons in that regard.

 

But if you understand, what I’m saying is the politics of the White man, the politics of the White Patriarchy, is not about pandering! Our politics is about laying down the law, explaining what we’re going to do and why we’re going to do it and how we’re going to do it. And then saying:

 

“This is the best outcome for everyone. What we’re doing right now is not working and we’re not making any further compromises on that’s the line in the sand.”

 

We’re actually only going to go further than that, we’re not going to come any less than that.

 

There is never, in my opinion, there’s never going to be a time where I or the vast majority of White people in Australia are going to accept are our slow ethnic replacement. It might appear that way right now, but it’s only because we’re not politically organised. This is not how the average Australian feels. This is not how the average White person around the world feels. The average White person around the world wants re-migration. They want to remain, at a minimum, 90%. That’s like the beginning. That’s not even, like controversial anymore, that the 90% or the 95% rule. That is the super majority of the population. I just like deport all of them except the good ones. That’s the super majority. And then you’ve probably still got the majority saying:

 

“No, no, it shouldn’t be 90, it should be 99%.”

 

So, yeah, anyway, I’ll pause there. I won’t cover that subject much more. Oh, my God! There’s a sorry, there’s a spastic in the chat. How do I do ban this person for life? I don’t want to mute. I keep making this mistake. If I mute, then I can’t ban. Isn’t that right? Okay, that just deleted it. Oh, yeah. Also muting on Rumble because Odysee is different. Muting on Rumble is banning. Cool. Glad we got that sorted.

 

I’ll go through the comments section. If there’s any comments on the Aboriginal question. Geez, everyone’s just arguing about Christianity. We’re not even talking about Christianity. We’re just talking about Aboriginals at this stage.

 

So, yeah, in short, as I said before, tell your friends that say this nonsense to you about how we should work together:

 

“We all got to work together. We all got to work together.”

 

They can have full sovereignty over themselves, but not us. Or they can have this fake sovereignty over everyone. Do they actually want full sovereignty? If they do, it can only be over themselves. That means apartheid. Ultimately, that means apartheid. What that looks like is a man can’t serve the Australian flag and the Aboriginal flag. You can’t go to a at the high school, at the courts, all these institutions. It’s got an Australian flag and it’s got an Aboriginal flag. That is not sustainable. It’s one or the other. It can’t be both.

 

And this idea of:

 

“Oh, we got to show solidarity and they’re not a threat to us and all this.”

 

It’s not sustainable. It’s not sustainable. It’s nice. Tingle feels. It feels really nice:

 

“Oh, look, I’m being empathetic. Oh, I’m a good person.”

 

You can have this virtue signaling, but we’re two very different peoples. We need to have sovereignty over ourselves. They need to have sovereignty over themselves. We need to be focused on Australia and White people and civilisation, the Western civilisation that we’re a part of, and they need to be focused on creating their own harmony, the dream time, their version of reality, fixing their problems, punishing their problems. They have a completely different version of reality to us. That is just how different ethnic groups and different races are built. They have different versions of reality. Things we see as a problem that they see it like a major problem, they see as a minor problem, and vice versa. Their biggest issue is White people are locking them up and putting them in jail. Like, they can’t even comprehend that our problem is that they’re committing heinous crimes. They can’t even comprehend that’s a problem. They see the problem as:

 

“Why are you locking us up?”

 

[35:04]

 

It’s the same with the blacks in America. How can these two groups of people live together when they have completely different versions of reality? So they should police themselves. Simple as! Part sovereignty over all or full sovereignty over part.

 

So you can’t have both. Simple. As I’ll move on. Hopefully the comment section is not talking about Christianity, someone says:

 

“Do I make my own toothpaste?”

 

Very funny. Yeah. And this applies not just to Australia, this applies to obviously, Canada and New Zealand as well. I think the Treaty of Waitangi is a mistake in New Zealand. I don’t know too much about the treaties in Canada. I know Alex Ferryman does. Yeah, it’s a mistake. It’s a mistake. Any treaty that exists needs to be a treaty of:

 

“Here’s your space. Here’s our space. You live there, we live here. You’re citizens of your country. We’re citizens of our country. We’re two separate nations. We’re not the same nation.”

 

They even call themselves the first nation so that by definition, they’re not part of our nation. They’re saying this. They’re saying this, not me. They are saying it. What else?

 

Let’s get into the nuts and bolts. The woman question. I need a need a breather. If we’re going to get into the woman question. I need a breather. Yeah. Someone says:

 

“Easiest solution is allow those same bleeding hearts to transfer their own funds to Aboriginals, not government or social funds. The Left can put their money where their mouth is.”

 

Yeah, absolutely! Well, I believe that all the bleeding hearts should go live with the Aboriginals. They should have Aboriginal citizenship. They want to be so bad. They hate White people so much. They hate being White!:

 

“White people are horrible, horrible people! And having White children is perpetuating White supremacy and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Good bye. Bye. See you later. Awesome! You know, we’ll strip all of these people of Australian citizenship when we come to power and there will be people that will say:

 

“Oh, my God, you can’t do that!”

 

Yes, we can and we will. They’re all going to get stripped of their Australian citizenship. These White people that work, that bow down and worship Aboriginals as their god. They can go live with their god. They can go live with their god. Simple. You know, you want to do the Welcome to Country acknowledgment of country, all this. Absolutely perfect! Perfect. Absolutely! Bye. Bye. Yeah, we don’t want those people living in our society. It doesn’t matter that they’re of the same blood as us. That doesn’t matter because they’re not of the same honour as us. They hate us! There are some sort of mutation of our bloodline that is antithetical to our existence. If Aboriginals didn’t exist, they would find some other group to nut hug. Hypothetically, because there’s no Aboriginals in England. Like you don’t see people advocating for the pre-Belgic-Celtic invasion of Bronze Age England. That doesn’t exist. You know, what kind of strain of Leftism would that be? You know, it’s obviously absurd because you’ve got a thousand years of homogeneity of many different layers of Celtic peoples then breeding in with many different layers of Germanic and Nordic peoples.

 

So it’s the English people, the British people are a relatively homogenised people. And so you don’t see that argument because those tribes can homogenise quite. I mean, obviously it still caused things like, I mean, I don’t want to get too much into the intricacies of English history, but you can see the precursor of things like civil war in previous ethnic distinctions.

 

So, for example, Croatia and Serbia are ethnically very similar, but they’re not ethnically the same. They are two different ethnicities and therefore they also have two different versions of their interpretation of Christianity. You’ve got Orthodoxy and you’ve got Catholicism. So ethnic differences play out also religiously and also politically. You’ll see this a lot through human history. You see it in the American Civil War. There was an ethnic difference in the American Civil War as well. Probably not as predominant, but I won’t go into it. Americans know that for themselves.

 

Now someone says:

 

“Tom’s right. They have a different reality. Go to any Northern Territory prison and you’ll see the system isn’t working.”

 

It’s not working by our standards. Absolutely! Our version, our reality of working and their version of working are two completely different things.

 

And I’ll finish it with this. I had a Dreamtime experience with Aboriginals. I’m sure I’ve told this story on stream years ago, so those that have been around a while will remember this story. But I had a friend in the army, a guy called Christopher Knight. He was a Special Forces guy. He’s a translator, he’s a linguist. And I don’t know what he’s doing now with his life, but I’m sure he’s doing well. And he was adopted. He got adopted in a cultural sense, or a linguistic sense by an Aboriginal. An Aboriginal tribe in Darwin in Northern Territory. And this guy was a, like one of those, what is called politician-linguist or something. This guy spoke like 50 languages. It was incredible! I’ve never seen anything like it. I mean, we would go out drinking in Mitchell street or whatever it’s called in the CBD of Darwin. It’s like one street and there’s like four bars on it. And any backpacker, he could speak their language. Any backpacker. It was really incredible!

 

[41:09]

 

Anyway on his weekends, he was going out and living with Aboriginals out in the middle of nowhere. And there were like some, there were full bloods and it’s very rare to find full bloods, but in Northern Territory it’s more common. There’s no way you can find full bloods outside of Northern Territory or Northern New, Southern Queensland or Northern WA. And he started hanging out with these, basically semi-nude Aboriginals in the bushland near Casuarina Beach on the weekends. And he knocks on my door. I don’t know, it was like one in the morning, one random. It was like a Tuesday, or a Thursday. And he says:

 

“Hey Tom or hey Sewell.”

 

Everyone calls you by your last name in the army:

 

“Hey Sewelly, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. They need a linguist. He was a two commando guy, but for some reason he was in our battalion. And he says, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. I’m getting on a plane and I have to say goodbye to some people and I had to run some errands. Can you drive me?”

 

Because I was one of the only LID, which lid means new guy or live in digger. I was one of the only LID that had a car. And I was friendly with him, and everyone thought he was a weirdo and I did as well. Weird means different things to me than it does to other people. When someone says weird, they mean like not radioactive, but they mean, you know, semi-ostracized. They mean:

 

“Oh, we don’t associate with that guy because he’s a weirdo!”

 

Whereas when someone’s weird, I am fascinated by human psychology. And so I was always very friendly with him because I wanted to know what made him tick. He had such a different version of reality to everyone else that I just really wanted to understand. I mean this guy was probably in his early 30s and I think I was 19 or 20 at the time.

 

So I was like:

 

“Unk, how do you view the world? What’s going on, Unk?”

 

Basically I was the same relationship I have with Zoomers and is like that relationship when I was The Age that a lot of Zoomers are that asked me for advice And I’m now. I’m now 90.

 

But anyway, he says, he’s like:

 

“Sewelly, you’re the only one with a car. You know, can you drive me around? I gotta say goodbye to some people.”

 

And so he drives me out in the middle of nowhere, and then we go walking for like 40 minutes down this beach. And I’m like:

 

“What are we doing?”

 

And we find these Aboriginals just on this beach in the middle of nowhere. And they’re all sitting cross legged and around a little campfire. And he introduces me to them and he’s speaking their language, like full Aboriginal! Like whatever sect of Aboriginal they are. And he’s speaking their language. And he introduces me and he says a bunch of Aboriginal words.

 

And then he says my name. And then he says:

 

“5 RAR, 5th Battalion.”

 

And I was like:

 

“What did you say to them?”

 

And he said:

 

“You’re a young warrior from my tribe, from the 5th Battalion tribe. And that you’re a good warrior. You’re a good, young, strong warrior and that you’re helping me today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh.”

 

And then they all, like, acknowledged me. They’re all sitting different. So it was men. I was sitting with the men, obviously, and the women were sitting at a different campfire with the women, and it was segregated.

 

And so I was with the men and Knighty was explaining to them how I was a good warrior, a good young warrior of the 55 RAR tribe. And we’re sitting there and they’re just talking and talking, and I went into a trance. I was tired, but I didn’t know what was, … It was like someone had drugged me. I was in a trance and I was just staring at the ocean, because we’re on the beach. And I was staring at the ocean and the sky was purple.

 

And I was like:

 

“Is there something in this fireplace? Like, what? Like, am I on?”

 

I’ve never at this stage, I’d never tried any drug ever!

 

And I was like:

 

“Is this what acid feels like?”

 

That’s what I was thinking in my head.

 

And I was like:

 

“What is going on?”

 

And they’re making that noise that they make. They’re talking and yeah. And then the sun’s coming up and I’m like, what is going on? And I look at the time and it’s like 6:30. And it was just surreal! It was a surreal experience. And then he’s like:

 

“All right, we’re gonna go.”

 

He gave them bananas and double A batteries. And he taught them how to like Jerry rig a phone to be able to give co-ordinates so that he could communicate where they were in the bush using GPS. And it was just fascinating! It was just absolutely fascinating! That was my first positive experience with Aboriginals. And I had had only about 500 negative experiences with Aboriginals prior to that moment. And every negative experience I’d had with Aboriginals was them being drunk, or not even drunk, but them just behaving the way they behave, and then being violent and aggressive towards me for just existing, for just walking down the street or just going to the shops at two o’ clock in the afternoon. Or them harassing like pregnant ladies trying to get in their car, demanding money off them. Like just every experience I had was so negative.

 

[46:02]

 

And then this was the first time I was like:

 

“I think I’m starting to understand these people. They live in a dream time.”

 

Like the proper full bloods. They live in a different reality to us. They don’t like time. The way we view time and the way they view time is completely different! And I somehow empathed in that moment into their little hive mind with Knightie, who was like my guide. His name was Christopher Knight, like a knight of Christ! And he was a very spiritually attuned man. And that was an experience I’ll never forget. I think I was almost, 20 years old. I was only 19!

 

But yeah, very interesting stuff. Very, very interesting stuff.

 

The stream looks frozen on my end. What is going on? No, no, it’s not frozen. Excellent! Yeah. What can I say? What can I say? I’ve seen the best of it and I’ve seen the worst of it. And the best of it is we should just leave these people alone. Like the problem is enlightenment. In a lot of ways, [chuckling] enlightenment has benefits, certainly. I’m not anti-enlightenment. You know, that’s a big part of how we’ve come to be. And it was a big part of our life cycle as a civilisation. It’s the second last phase of civilisation is enlightenment. The Greeks went through this around, I don’t know, 400 B.C. And yeah, I’m not against, you can’t be against it because it’s nature, it’s time itself.

 

But one of the dumbest parts of enlightenment is “equality”. That’s the dumbest part of enlightenment. The, the, that is the false enlightenment. The false enlightenment is that we’re all blank slates and that we’re all equal. That you know:

 

“All men are created equal before God and blah blah, blah!”

 

That is the most. How the hell. I don’t even know if they sincerely believe that. I can’t even fathom that they were that stupid that the people that colonised Australia, … Because when I read Clark, I’ve got it right here actually, this one here.

 

So this guy’s a communist. He’s a piece of shit, Leftist communist! And he wrote A History of Australia. I have, I’ve only read this one. I haven’t read the other volumes. I think this one ends around 1830. And he wrote this in I think 1961 or 62. And he’s a full blown communist and was investigated by ASIO for being, for coordinating with. Here’s the big boy here. Here’s the main man. Here’s the main man. Mr. Cook. Captain Cook. Anglo Saxon. Anglo Saxon. But yeah, Melbourne University. He’s a commie at Melbourne University.

 

Anyway, I read it. It’s quite interesting, quite subversive. But he, oh, he really emphasises the how enlightened Captain Cook and you know, Arthur Bligh and all these guys were and how they, but what’s interesting is he can’t hide the fact that despite their Enlightenment, despite the fact that they. Excuse me. They arrived in Australia and they tried to treat the Aboriginals as equals.

 

And so they’re like:

 

“Hey, let’s trade.”

 

And then there was nothing to trade. So they were like:

 

“Hey, let’s, …”

 

It was like a clash of values because they had these Enlightenment values and they didn’t know how to implement them on the Aboriginals. They didn’t know.

 

And so there was a whole bunch of different treat ways the Aboriginals were treated by European colonists. And I think it was the Portuguese and the Spanish in the Americas, but a little bit even in the Asia Pacific region, the Portuguese were in Asia Pacific as well. And they were basically like:

 

“You’re going to convert to Catholicism by the sword!”

 

And what Clark says is that they didn’t have those Enlightenment values. So you’ve got like Protestant Anglos trying to communicate with Aboriginals and like uplift them into humanity and uplift them into civility.

 

And then you’ve got the Portuguese with almost like pre-Enlightenment Catholic values that were just like “convert or die”. And that’s quite interesting. You know, it’s possible to talk about history without talking about Christianity. But yeah, that’s quite interesting. I won’t expand on that too much. You can gather from that what you want.

 

Yeah, where was I going with that? Yeah, he has all these little anecdotes or all these little stories about these first encounters and how, yeah, the enlightened English were just bewildered and were just like:

 

“We’ve never encountered this anywhere in the world!”

 

And he’s actually honest about the criticisms that they had. I think he might over embellish their enlightenment principles. I think they were probably a lot more racist than what he’s articulating because he’s a communist.

 

But yeah, I think I titled this Aboriginal communism, didn’t I? Before we get into the woman question, ultimately, if we don’t segregate from Aboriginals, we’re going to get destroyed by Aboriginal communism the way that what’s going on in South Africa, they’re dealing with African communism. And when you end apartheid and you mix or you attempt to get the races to all live together in equality and one is so different to the other, it’s a race to the bottom! And that’s ultimately what communism is, it’s a race to the bottom.

 

And it’s not just anti-enlightenment because there’s a lot of things that are anti-enlightenment, but it is anti-life! It’s ultimately anti-life because our version of life is an upward force, not a, so it’s hard to cover this without getting into the Greeks. You got to get into the Greeks because they figured all this out! And I don’t mean like the Greeks is in the souvlaki shop. I mean like the ancient Greeks, the philosophy.

 

The Greeks realised that when they went through their enlightenment that there’s not just being, there’s becoming. And that the ultimate being is becoming. And we use the word “progress” now and that word is obviously really dirty and that’s why I don’t use it. It’s a very dirty word. To say something is “progressive”, you’re saying it’s Leftist.

 

[53:19]

 

And so the Leftists have actually somehow inverted “becoming” into “progression”. And so when they say it’s progressive, it’s actually regressive! It’s regressive of the total life force. Leftism is the downward path. It’s not Left versus Right, it’s up versus down! And this is something that you really need to understand. Communism, Aboriginal communism, jewish communism, any form of communism, any form of Leftist progression is a progression downwards! It’s progressing the life form downwards. And this applies to even politics of today.

 

So if you want to talk about party politics, if you want to call it that if you want to talk about Parliamentarianism, what the Labor Party here in. I know this is people like, I’m tuning out. I don’t want to hear this. But normies want to hear this. Normies, you do need to. If you’re listening to this, you’re probably not a normie. And you do need to know how to apply the logic that I’m articulating here in the stream to things other than ancient Greece and ancient Rome and like all this stuff, you need to be able to apply it to be able to explain it to, … You need to be able to speak in tongues and that doesn’t mean like that crazy Evangelical crap. That means you need to be able to speak the tongue of the people.

 

And so what the Labor Party here in Australia has done is they’ll get lost on this because they haven’t read a book on economics, but it’s this Keynesian economics where it’s window breaking. So they believe that if you keep breaking windows, the GDP will go up because the glazier is going to make more money. And, it’s all that in conjunction with Fabian socialism. So Fabian socialism is what:

 

“We want the windows to be broken because we want more money wasted on fixing windows instead of building the power system.”

 

And so Fabian socialists or Fabian Communists, Fabian Marxists. They’re ultimately Marxists. They want to create this workers revolution through accelerating the decline of society by wasting as much money as possible.

 

And so that’s why the NDIS is the way it is. That’s why the NDIS is bigger than the defense budget. That’s why we spend more money on parasites and retards than we do on protecting the nation from foreign invasion. It’s why we spend so much money on basically compounding problems. Not fixing problems, but compounding problems! And the problem itself is often the expenditure, the wastage, the fact that we’re taxing the noble, the good, the healthy, and we’re giving to the evil and the weak and the disgusting and the decrepit.

 

And this is Kali Yuga stuff. This is end of time stuff. This is what Hitler talks about in Mein Kampf. Why you have to read Mein Kampf. It’s not negotiable. It’s not negotiable! If there’s only one book you should read, it’s Mein Kampf, because he explains all of this. He explains exactly what’s happening, exactly why it’s happening and exactly what you need to do to stop it from continuing to destroy your society.

 

So that’s why they’re window breaking. That’s why the Labor Party and all the Greenies and all these freaks, they’re all on board with destroying society through taking money from good people and giving it to broken people. And what that does is that what you feed grows. And they know that! They know that! They know it and they’ve already projected how that industry is going to expand. And it is beyond political parties. I mean it’s the Uni-Party doing it. It’s not just the Labor Party. But it obviously gets worse under one and then the other does Labor Party light. They do Fabian socialism light. That’s what the Liberal Party is. It’s homosexuality light. Fabian socialism light. Retard economics light. You know it’s diet retardation!

 

Anyway. Aboriginal communism. Yeah. Where are we? Yeah. I don’t normally do Superchats mid conversation but Delvian said:

 

“Isn’t the abo love a second order consequence of White men becoming feminised and White women hating their own men?”

 

There’s definitely an element to that. I think there’s a lot of different components to the so-called “Aboriginal love”. There’s the false enlightenment, there’s self hatred. Yes. There’s virtue signaling. So society is structured wrong, which is what we’re going to get into with the feminine society and the woman question. Society is structured with an inversion of natural law. The moral framework of society is an inversion of what our society was built on.

 

So that is often described as late stage decline or degeneration where you forget what your purpose was to such an extent where it’s upside down. There’s obviously nefarious influence. There’s particular (((interest groups))) that are a particular ethno-religious orientation and they compound and accelerate and destabilise. Certainly. They’re obviously a major player in that process but it does happen on its own. And you know there’s a lot of, I won’t go into all the proverbs and quotes on the subject but this festering can only exist if you’re already going in that direction. What we need is a complete re-evaluation of values. And you know we have gone through two or three generations of a nihilist phase and we are re interpreting and revaluing our values. We are so far ahead morally of where we were 50 years ago. And people will aay:

 

“No! That’s not true. No! People were so conservative back in the day.”

 

And it’s like they were running off inertia. They hadn’t actually evaluated their values. They were just running off inertia. We’re actually so much further ahead by going through the decline, seeing the nihilism, seeing the hedonism.

 

[1:00:19]

 

 

And I have so much faith and hope in the young generation. Young White people across the world, obviously, a lot of them are infected with the social disease. A lot of them are infected. But the ones that aren’t infected with the social disease have immunity. They have immunity! They have built up. They don’t need to be injected with anything. They have natural immunity! Young White people across the Western world are growing up immune to this social disease. And the disease of our time is not the plague. It’s not the Spanish Flu. It’s not? What is it? You know, all the ones that people, tuberculosis. It’s not these things that are killing people anymore, you know.

 

And Edward Dutton covers this a lot. I’ve talked about this on streams for years and years, and I’m so glad someone actually wrote a book about it. I’ve only read the blurb. I haven’t actually read the whole book, but I might actually get around to reading it at some point. But Dutton covers this and he explains that just the mutational load has the selection process now is, are you a retard or are you not? And if you’re not a retard, you’re most likely immune to the retardation that’s destroying our society.

 

So, yeah. All right, we’ll do it. We’ll go into the woman question. Check the comments first. Someone says:

 

“Ban women!”

 

No, we don’t need to ban them. Reese White says:

 

“Thomas. So are you a fan of Adam Green?”

 

I don’t really know anything about Adam Green. I’ve seen him on Twitter. He’s the anti-Christian guy, isn’t he? He’s kind of built like a platform. I haven’t seen him at all! I’ve never spoken to him. I don’t really know anything about him. I only know of him. Yeah, I can’t comment on that question. I’ve seen a lot of people attack him saying he’s jewish, and I’ve seen him say that Christianity is jewish.

 

So it’s like everyone’s saying:

 

“You’re a jew! No, you’re a jew! No, you’re a jew!”

 

And it’s like I’m not getting into it. It’s not in my sphere. I think I’ve seen him do chats with HT [Handsome Truth]. Yeah, we will cover a little bit of Christianity here. But yeah, you all know I’m not Christian. But we will cover it and we’ll cover it in a respectful way. I think that any criticism people have of Christianity should be done respectfully. I know that’s hard to do. It is very hard to do. But this is a, yeah, I try to be as secular as possible and yeah, let’s start with that. Let’s actually start with Christianity.

 

Let’s start with. If we’re going to talk about the woman question, let’s talk about Christianity.

 

So the Hebrew mythology or the Hebrew founding story is Adam and Eve. It’s a bit different to other founding stories, but you’ll find there’s so much similarities when you’re talking about the origins of man from. And I don’t use mythology. I don’t say mythology in a bad way. I don’t say it in a, I don’t mean it in a negative way. I’m not putting a pejorative on it. You know, all founding myth is myth. It’s mythos. We don’t know for sure, but we can respect myth. I respect myth. Yeah, and geez, we’re already into it.

 

But we all know the story Genesis. So we have this perfect garden of peace and harmony and the founding story of Christianity and therefore the founding message, the founding message of Christianity is that women are inherently attracted to evil. And breaching the peace and harmony of the garden that’s created by the father.

 

So it’s kind of like women inherently have to “shit test” a situation, a society, a these aren’t my words. This is not even my personal interpretation. I didn’t come up with this is what the Bible says.

 

And anyone that has a different version of Genesis is a moron and hasn’t read it. So many Christians haven’t read the Bible. Probably one of my main issues with Christians is that they haven’t read the Bible. I don’t think you should be allowed to call yourself a Christian if you haven’t read the Bible.

 

And likewise, I don’t think people should call themselves a National Socialist if they haven’t read Mein Kampf. I don’t think you should say that. I think you should say I’m interested in National Socialism, but I don’t think you should identify with it. You should hear the words from the man. He says it all. He outlines 95% of it in one book. And it’s a lot easier to read than the Bible. The Bible is a very hard book to read. It’s very tedious at parts. It, sure, it has beautiful parts, like all religious books have beautiful parts, but it is a very hard read. It’s a very long book. It’s like a million words. It takes a long time. Unless you race through it, if you race through it, you’re going to miss things. But Genesis is very clear. Like the first books, Genesis and Exodus, these things are very clear. Very, very clear. There’s no, not much nuance to it.

 

Now there’s obviously different mythological interpretations. What is the snake and what is the apple and what is God’s command and all this. But if you’re going to found a religion off this principle, it’s going to bleed through the whole text, isn’t it?

 

So whatever you’re reading later on in the Bible has to always come back to Genesis and a belief system that men and women were created unequally, that man was created from breathing life into dust or into matter. Women were created from the rib of man, so from the side. So it’s a peer, but it’s not an equal peer. There’s some sort of difference there. And so, I mean, obviously.

 

[1:07:14]

 

But I was talking to Jacob recently and he’s been deep diving Plato. Absolutely deep diving Plato. I’ve read the Republic, but I haven’t read much else from Plato. And he was negging Aristotle, which I was surprised at because I actually prefer, at this stage, I prefer Aristotle to Plato, not to get too much into philosophy, but I’ve only read the Republic. So and I didn’t really rate it, to be honest. I thought it was an interesting dialogue, but I didn’t rate it as much as it gets glazed. But he’s been reading all the other stuff. Full deep diving into everything, every single thing the guy’s written. And what he said to me was, and this is very recently, he said to me that the Greeks believed that, or Plato believed, and this became quite a common belief system, that if that souls were created, this is before Christianity, they believe that souls were created fresh and that they were all men, that if you lived a bad life, if you were a bit, you know, weak or immoral, that you would be reincarnated in your next life as a woman. And this became a pretty well established belief system. And it’s interesting that that is in some way similar to Christianity, that they arrived at a position where they were ripe for proselytisation from Christian apostles.

 

So let’s start there. Obviously, European Paganism is many things, just as Christianity is many things. There’s so much schism within Paganism. And when you’re talking generally about Paganism, you’re talking about general principles which we know from Greek, Roman, Zoroastrian, Indus Valley, and obviously Germanic and Celtic Paganism. And people will cherry pick what they want.

 

There are female church leaders at the moment. I mean, that’s just absurd to me that the whole book is a document saying that women can’t accurately interpret God. They can’t accurately communicate or interpret or follow instruction from God. And therefore they shouldn’t be in charge of the Church. They can’t be in charge of society, they can’t be in charge of the Church. They just don’t possess the correct component to do that. And the whole religion is founded on that principle.

 

And then you have such a degradation of the Church that you now have women pastors and preachers and priests, priestesses or whatever you’d call them. I mean, it’s absurd! It’s not my church, I’m not a Christian. But the hypocrisy is despicable! It is truly despicable! So fascinating!

 

Now, Paganism has varying degrees of male and female relationships. Some interpretations of Paganism are a bit more equitable, others a lot less equitable.

 

So when we go back to the ancients and when we look at thousands of years of civilisation, there is not really any society that has treated men and women as the same, nor has there been a society that has treated women the way women are being treated right now! And it’s not a surprise that our birth rates are really low. Any society that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any civilisation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any nation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies! And therefore it is a footnote in somebody else’s history.

 

So we have to reevaluate our values and we have to completely change the way we behave or we’re going to die!

 

And so the woman question is the same question as White genocide. It’s the same question as White replacement. You cannot separate the two. You can’t say:

 

“Let’s stick to just White nationalism and let’s not talk about how evil feminism is. Let’s talk about White replacement. But we’ve got to keep women on side. We can’t say things that might hurt the feelings of women.”

 

And as I said at the start of the stream, this is a really dumb, weak, coward strategy that’s going to cause us to die as a race! Women don’t respect pandering. They find it disgusting! Feminists are pure evil! And they will because of there’s some force, you know, Christians could say they’re possessed. And I do put a lot of weight in possession. I know not everyone does because not everyone believes they have a soul. And not everyone believes in metaphysics or in like a spirit realm. And so people that are very rational will say:

 

“This person’s unwell, or this person’s mentally ill.”

 

All means the same thing. Whereas the more religious or spiritual way of looking at it is this person is spiritually ill, this person’s potentially possessed. And this isn’t very electable, but I have witnessed what I could only describe as exorcisms. I have seen the way some people have behaved, and there is no rational or logical explanation other than this person is possessed. This person has a demon, a demon in them! They’re not at rest. They’re not in harmony. They’re not. There’s something that is currently occupying them and it’s potentially just a phase, but if it keeps occurring, it’s like there’s something that rears its head, something unbecoming.

 

And that’s a difficult conversation to have with people that don’t believe in demons. They don’t believe that it could be possible. They’re so far into post Enlightenment rationalism that just:

 

“It’s so irrational, the idea that there are forces beyond our control that could perhaps be bad forces!”

 

You know, we can acknowledge that there is a good force and inherently good force on earth, but then we want to pretend that there’s not an inherently bad force on earth?

 

[1:13:57]

 

So instead of arguing about whether Christianity is cucked or not, instead a better conversation is, what can we learn from Christianity? Where is Christianity right? And where is modern Christianity wrong? Or where is Christianity philosophically wrong? That’s a much more important discussion and it’s a more respectful discussion as well. Because what you’ll find is I can have these conversations. I had a conversation recently, probably 20, 30 minutes, with some Christian guys in America, and we could have a respectful conversation about what’s happening through that lens, through that lens of that there is an evil that is possessing. There is a snake in the garden, and it’s corrupting women. And then women are corrupting men. And that women, sorry, men, are aware of the snake. Snake, but most men are not aware of how this snake has perverted women.

 

And so the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read] is we need to normalise Patriarchy. I’m a big, big proponent of Patriarchy. I think that Patriarchy is the only way to save the White race. We cannot save the White race through feminism. We cannot save the White race through equality. We can only save the White race through a proper Patriarchy. A proper Patriarchy! And whether you’re Christian, pagan, agnostic, enlightened, not enlightened, Catholic, orthodox, doesn’t matter! We cannot solve male, female. It does not matter! We cannot solve this problem without Patriarchy.

 

Now, it’s very easy for me to acknowledge Patriarchy because, one, I had a really good father. I have a really good father. My father’s still alive. I have a really good father. A really good father! And he has his flaws. Absolutely! And that’s product of environment and breeding and everything else. Right. We all have our flaws. I have my flaws. Product of environment and breeding and circumstance. But we’re on a mission! My bloodline has definitely been through the wars, and we’re on our way back up. All right. There’s a few more generations of work to do to really get us back on track. But I’m part of a Patriarchy. I have a lot of respect for my family name, my line, my lineage, my ancestry. This is really important to me.

 

And, it’s easy for me to accept and acknowledge this harsh reality. It’s not even a harsh reality. This reality because of what I come from. Women that have good fathers can accept this as well. Most women that can’t accept Patriarchy, they don’t have any respect for their fathers. And they don’t have respect for their fathers because their fathers don’t deserve respect.

 

Respect is not something that you’re entitled to. It is only earned. And I know that’s a platitude, and some people might think that’s a meaningless platitude, but that is absolutely core! Respect is earned! You’re not entitled to anyone’s respect. This is, I think, a false enlightenment principle that, like you should just respect the retard being moved around in the wheelchair. Like, what? What planet are these people on? Like, why that makes you a good person? How does that make me a good person? You know what quality of life is the drooling retard, God? And why are we wasting all our tax dollars paying for the drooling retard? This is solved very easily by Patriarchy. It’s not just solved by having a department in government that deals with the problem. It’s solved by Patriarchy.

 

And so one of the first principles of Patriarchy is that every man is king and priest and judge of his own house! I’ll say it again, for those that aren’t listening. The first principle of Patriarchy is that every man is king, is priest, is judge of his own house! And general. That was a component as well. There’s a martial component to it. And so every son, every boy wants to respect his father for the man that he is. And I can’t empath into how girls think, because I’m not a girl, but I would assume it’s similar. Not the same, but I assume it’s similar. I obviously have daughters. And you know what I was sad about when I was growing up? Not sad, but one thing I was surprised at was I asked my dad why he never joined the army. Because I know his dad was in the navy or in the Defense Force. I know his granddad was in the army.

 

And I remember asking my dad:

 

“Why weren’t you in the army?”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, look.”

 

Because they had the draught for the Vietnam War, and he was of that age, and he just never got called up. So he was like:

 

“Oh, I got lucky!”

 

That was his answer. I think he said something:

 

“I got lucky. You know, you put your birthday in. You had to register. You put your birthday in.”

 

And he said something about “balls with birthdays” on them. Like, it was like the lotto. Like, they’d pull a ball out. And if it was like, March 18th, which is my dad’s birthday, then you’re going, you’re signing up.

 

And I thought that was absurd! But it’s one way to do it. I mean, it’s fucking clown world! But anyway, that was his position, was like:

 

“Oh, he got lucky. He avoided it.”

 

And I always thought to myself, wouldn’t it be cool? I always thought, wouldn’t it be cool to walk into my dad’s office and he’s got all his, like, armour and his rifle? And I just had this idea of like. And it’s probably ancient. It’s probably something like an altar, like an altar to Mars, like an altar to masculinity, an altar to the Patriarchy. And then to be able to see my grandfathers and you know there are families that still, they keep all their family medals, the war medals and stuff.

 

[1:20:20]

 

But I mean let’s put that on steroids. It’s not just having like the medals, it’s like walk in and be able to see like generations and generations of uniforms and rifles and, or even before going all the way back to a family sword. That just, that idea is just so cool! And I think every like 10 year old boy thinks like that.

 

And if you don’t, you’re probably a faggot, or maybe you had the idea but in a different way. But if that doesn’t seem cool to you, yeah, fuck you basically! I don’t know. Yeah, you’re not in my gang, that’s for sure. You’re not in my tribe.

 

So back to the woman question. So [chuckling] respect, respect. You can respect that. And I didn’t respect my dad as much as I would have if we had something like that. If my dad had something like I kind of lost a little bit of respect for my dad when I was like 10 years old. When I was like:

 

“Why wasn’t my dad. His answer was he ‘got lucky’.”

 

I was like:

 

“Huh, I don’t know if that’s luck.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like why would that be lucky? Obviously it’s a dumb war and blah, blah, blah and geopolitics is so broken and everything now.

 

But I think part of us is whether you go and fight in a war or not, I think men should be war-like. And I think the “retard budget” should be directed entirely into well first of all we shouldn’t be taxed as much as we are. So there shouldn’t even be a retard budget.

 

But obviously I like when we take power. I’m deleting the retard budget and putting all of it or most of it or some of it into building like the Stormtrooper halo suit Department. I’ve said this before.

 

To get back onto, someone just says:

 

“Fuck employment!”

 

[chuckling] Modern world does a Superchat:

 

“Thoughts on the employee question.”

 

I actually haven’t watched the podcast that young Michael Nelson did on the subject of employment but I can imagine what he was saying. My position has always been that you need to be productive, you need to be productive, you need to find a way of being productive. You don’t want to just sit around doing nothing! But you need to have times of sitting around doing nothing in order to think of productive things to do.

 

And when you’re in employment, like I have had nothing but issues with like Gen-X’s and Boomers that have employed me over the years where they want you to work 50, 60 hour weeks, they want you just in employment, they want you just head down and just hammer drill in the concrete and just ernnn! Or if you’re doing some other job that’s slightly more technical or less manual labour, it’s the same thing. It’s just head down and you’ve just got no time, no time to be a better man. You’re just stuck in a trap! You’re stuck in like a debt trap. And I don’t think there’s ever been a time in human history where anyone except slaves have worked six days a week or even five days a week. I just think that that’s slavery and they’re boxing us in. We’re getting boxed in and boxed in and boxed in! It’s so obvious what’s happening and it’s so obvious why Zoomers especially and Gen Alpha will be even more so, why people are checking out of this employee, … We’re just getting boxed in.

 

Like we’ve gone from nice blocks of land. There’s plenty of things to do, there’s plenty of animals to tend to. And then you work a couple days a week, you know, old mate needs help with something, you go help him, this guy and people were these warrior farmer builders first, and they were doctors and doctors and dentists and lawyers and tradesmen or skilled labourers second. And it was the pleb class. It’s always historically been the pleb class that became entirely microscopically focused on a singular trade. So like I do pottery, that’s all I do they live in a tiny little house in the city in Rome and they’re the Potter. And all they do is pottery and they just make pots and nothing else. And they do it six days a week, 12 hours a day. And they make pots and they sell the pots and they make pots and they sell the pots. That is what slaves do. That’s what slaves do. That’s slavery!

 

And so, but the whole economics is geared against us because of what they’ve done, because of interest, because of debt slavery. It’s because of debt slavery we can’t build intergenerational wealth where we can have big families on large plots of land where we can learn a whole bunch of skills and manage our farms and feed ourselves and look after ourselves in tight knit communities.

 

The whole economics is now geared that everyone’s a little bug, a little cog in the system. They do their little bug roll and they get their little bug ration and this is broken. This is not sustainable. It’s not going to last. How many generations is this going to go on for? Judging by how much Zoomers want to check out, I’d suggest that Alphas or Betas or what like two or three generations from now, if this problem hasn’t solved itself, I would assume things are gonna be very different.

 

[1:26:10]

 

 

And obviously tying this into politics we’re gonna completely change the zoning laws. Part of the problem with this is people living on 200 square metre little blocks, apartments, townhouses. Part of this is just so dysgenic. We need to not be slave bug people. We need space, we need land, we need multitudes of tasks. Specialisation is key. Don’t get me wrong. We built higher civilisation because individuals did hyper specialise into things. But making pots is not a hyper specialisation. You know what I mean? Like historically people did their specialisation part time. They’d worked a couple days a week doing, and it was usually what was called journeymen. They were usually journeymen like if they were a dentist, or a doctor or whatever and obviously there was no such thing as a lawyer. The whole system worked differently, like tradition, ancient culture and the higher becoming. We have better technology now, but it’s made us, I think we can do both. I think we can continue to improve technology without living like bugs. And I don’t think that interest slavery helped us increase our technology. The increasing technology is part of the life cycle. It’s part of the life cycle of civilisation. And it’s not going to continue progressing in this direction forever for two reasons. One, the law of diminishing returns. And two, we are destroying our stock. So we can’t. We’re going to be in a system decline. The car, the calibre of men that built the society. We can’t even maintain it. We can’t even maintain it.

 

And there’s an elite. They call it elite overproduction. But it’s not. It’s the false elite overproduction. We’ve built a false elite and that’s why these rodents that are all 100, 105 IQ, they got Master’s degrees. They’re absolute midwits! They’re not idiots, but they’re absolute midwits! They are the ones running this into the ground. We have allowed midwits to take over society!

 

And I’m not going to talk about what my IQ is because I don’t think it’s super important, but I think it’s clear that it’s at least one or two standard deviations above average. And we’re having midwits go through university, male and female, and then they’re taking elite positions, but there’s not enough elite positions, so they have to create positions for these other fake elites.

 

And that’s like psychology, for example. You’ve got so many idiots going through university and studying psychology. And so we’ve created a whole industry of government rebates here in Australia and in America you’ve got all this drug prescription and all this mental illness and all this compounding issues of the parasitism of psychology. Psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapists, all of this is a parasite economy. They’re all parasites. They’re all parasites! It’s one giant parasite economy! And the purpose of it is to continue to make the problem worse so that they can have employment. And so they will never, ever be able to solve the problem because a purpose of a system is what it does.

 

So that’s just one element of university that’s caused this over education. We’ve got this over education where if you don’t go to university, you’re a moron. And it’s like we have more engineers and architects than we’ve ever had and our society is uglier and more broken! So it shows you that exclusion is the rule to greatness. You need to be exclusive in order to create hyper specialisation. You can’t just send everyone to university or the vast majority of people to university, and then think:

 

“Oh my God, society is getting so much better!”

 

It’s like, no, we’re running off the inertia of intelligent, hyper selective people. And the show’s about to come to a halt. We have printed so much money! They’re literally printing like $8 trillion, not a trillion, 8 billion dollars a day in the US to keep their bullshit fake economy going. And it’s just leading to the Weimar conditions. And we’re going to pay for all of this. We’re going to pay for all of this.

 

And that’s why you need to be prepared. You need to be prepared. And I’ve gone off topic from Patriarchy, but it all ties together. You can’t cover the subject without covering it all. Obviously. I’ll take a pause and I’ll come back.

 

Someone asked me about the employment question. Yeah. You gotta have skills. Look, you gotta have skills. Home of the brave, says:

 

“Tom, you’re the embodiment of the spiritual healing of the entire European race. Hey, we approach phase one of total re-migration of nons in the West. Segregation. Stay safe!”

 

Nah, I can’t do that on the stream. It’s a good question. I appreciate the question. Maybe I can leave that to the end. I can’t do that at this stage. I have to cover the woman question. Celine says:

 

“As a younger White woman, I’ve had to come to terms with Jesus being brown when I’ve always pictured him as a tall White man. Jesus being brown makes me deny it. Christianity is more of a woman thing.”

 

I don’t necessarily agree with. I don’t know what Jesus looked like. But I’ll tell you a really funny story. I’m not sure if I told this story on stream. Obviously all the Christian identitarians are raging at you now because they’re all saying Jesus was blonde hair, blue eyed, Aryan. I saw a really funny post yesterday or last night where some guy was saying that Jesus was Italian. He was like:

 

“He was born in Judea of the Roman province of Syria. He was therefore Roman. He was therefore Italian. Jesus was Italian!”

 

I just thought it was funny. Obviously he’s not being serious, but I wonder what the implications of everyone saying Jesus was Italian would be. And whether that’s like a bit of an icebreaker. Because it’s like people say Jesus is a jew. Well, the Bible says Jesus is a jew. And then Christian Identitarian said Jesus was like a Nordic Aryan. And then it’d be funny if we just say like:

 

“We meet at halfway and say Jesus was Sicilian or something!”

 

That’ll [chuckling] cause drama, won’t it, that one! But that just would be funny. We’re like, Jesus was White passing. That’s like the compromise. Now I know you people don’t believe in compromise. They want it one way or the other. Maybe that’ll keep the peace for like five minutes. If we just say Jesus was Italian. It’s a theory. What’s the funny story? So someone in the conversation tell me if I’ve said this before on stream. I can’t remember. Some [chuckling] guy replied, “smartest women woman”. Look, I think I’ve only told this story in person. It’s story time. I might have said it once on stream.

 

[1:33:41]

 

So the last time I was in prison last year I was in solitary confinement and I wanted a Bible. Actually, this Bible right here, this one right here. King James. I wanted a King James Bible because I got my other prison Bible. This is the prison Bible I got the first time into prison. It’s the NIV*. Look at that. [chuckling] Presented to Thomas Sewell, Melbourne Assessment Prison. That was in 2021.

 

[* The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.]

 

Anyway. This is now:

 

“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man. Adam and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame.”

 

Genesis 3:16:

 

“To the woman, he said, ‘I will make your pains in childbearing very severe. With painful labour you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you’.”

 

“Then the Lord said to Cain, where is your brother Abel? I don’t know. He replied, am I my brother’s keeper? The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen, your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for. You will be a restless wanderer of the earth.”

 

Yes, well, they got the mark on him. And I really wonder when circumcision started and when the restless wanderers of the earth started getting the anti-semitisms on him. Anyway, that’s just a theory. I won’t go too deep into that or piss people off.

 

But anyway, I got that version and I read it in full.

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow, okay!”

 

I probably should have read this the first time, but I wasn’t ready because you kind of you read the Bible when you’re a kid and you just like, you don’t read it properly, you don’t read it in full. And when you’re in solid confinement, you get a lot of time to read the Bible. And I read the NIV and I was like:

 

“Whoa, okay, this is definitely eye opening.”

 

And everyone’s trying to convert me. And I’m like:

 

“No, I can’t. Like, I just read it. I just read the whole thing. Are you kidding me?”

 

And they were like:

 

“You read the wrong translation.”

 

So then this time I went to prison. I went and got a King James. It didn’t make any difference for me. But I do think the King James is a better Bible. But story time.

 

So how did I get the King James Bible? So when I got to prison this time I got sent to Barwon, which is a much nicer prison. It’s older, but it is better. And because I was in Port Phillip before that. And they wouldn’t give me a Bible, they took my Bible off me. I got another NIV. I got a wait, is that King. No. So that’s a King James. No, they took it off me, sorry. I got that one later I got another NIV and when I got transferred from Melbourne Assessment the second time to the prison, the Barwon prison, they took my NIV off me and I had to fill out a form to get another Bible.

 

And I was like:

 

“Why? Why would you take the Bible off me? I don’t understand. Just let me keep the book.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, it’s not your property. It’s the property of the MAP.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“So you’re going to send the Bible back to the MAP, back to the other prison?”

 

It’s just crazy! But they’re just there to fuck with you. That’s their existence. And they won’t even let a non-Christian man keep his Christian book. And so then I had to fill out a form to get a Bible. And to get a Bible you had to have a meeting with a priest.

 

So if you want a Quran, you could have a meeting with an imam. If you want to. Whatever it is what it is. I don’t know what the Buddhists have. But like there was these boxes you could tick. I ticked the Christian box and I picked the Anglican one because I’m an Anglo Saxon and I’m not a Catholic, I’m not orthodox, and my grandmother was Anglican. None of the men in my family went to church really, but the women did. And they were Anglicans and so, Church of England. So I picked the Anglican box and it took two weeks.

 

And then this guy, I get pulled out of my cell and I get put in like a visitor room and I’m put in there with a priest. And I’ll just check the comments. Have I told this story on stream? Because I won’t go into too much detail if I have. Oh Jesus, so many comments. Have I told this story before? I’ll just tell the story!

 

And so he was like. I asked him:

 

“Why are you Christian?”

 

And he told me a story. The priest, he said that when he was a teenager he was really angry and him and his mates went out to this golf course and they had a BB gun and they shot a bunch of magpies or something. A bird, I can’t remember what type of bird I think was a magpie. Magpies. And he just felt horrible! He just felt horrible about it afterwards. He had a lot of regret and guilt about killing these magpies.

 

[1:40:02]

 

And then, he was raised in a Christian household, in a Christian environment, but he just wouldn’t go to church. And after like leaving the Church for a year or two and kind of hanging out with the wrong kids and you know, doing bad stuff, like shooting magpies with BB guns, as like most 14 year old boys probably would if they had a BB gun, he started noticing the kids walking home from church. They just looked happier. They just looked happier. And he was like:

 

“I wanted that happiness. I wasn’t happy and I wanted that happiness. And so I started going back to church and I asked my priest, when I was 14, I said I want to be happy like the other kids, they’re all happy. Why am I happy? And the priest said to me, you have to surrender yourself to God. You have to be God’s slave. You have to submit yourself. And once you submit yourself, then you’ll be happy. Then you’ll finally find peace. Because you’re fighting God and that’s why you’re unhappy. And you just have to stop fighting. You have to give up! And when you give up and you let go, then you’ll finally be happy.”

 

And he says:

 

“Why do you ask?”

 

And I was like:

 

“So I asked because I’m not Christian, but I ticked the Anglican box because it was the closest thing that I could do. But what I really want is a Bible. So I’ve got something to read in here because they’re torturing me and I’d like a Bible.”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, okay, okay, yeah, but why do you want to know why I’m a Christian?”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m just fascinated. I want to know your story. Like you’re a priest. Like you’re obviously highly motivated to be a Catholic, Anglican priest. You know, I just, I want to learn more about your journey and like how that, how do you become an Anglican priest?”

 

And then we talk a lot more about this subject. And he’s very, he’s very apprehensive. He’s very like on the back foot the whole time, very defensive. And yeah, just the way he explained it to me, I said to him:

 

“You know, do you still have this same attitude? Like, do you still feel this way about God? Is that your relationship with God?”

 

And he said to me, he said:

 

“I wake up every morning, and the first thing I do every morning is I pray to God and I say, God, I am your slave. Let your will be done through me! I am your vessel. I am your slave on this earth!”

 

And I was like:

 

“You do that every morning?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Yep, that’s what I do.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow! That is fascinating!”

 

And he’s like:

 

“It is, isn’t it? And I know that might sound really intense, but it works. It works for me! And I’m so much happier. Life is so much easier this way. It’s just so much easier! Like, I don’t feel what I used to feel. And, look, I still have challenges, and I’m a grandfather now, and da, da, da, da. But life is just so much easier this way!”

 

Okay, [chuckling] what the fuck! Okay. Anyway, an hour goes by, we shake hands, and he goes:

 

“Nice to meet you, Tom. Blah, blah, blah.”

 

And then the second time I meet him, so I ticked the box again. I want to have another conversation. He says to me right at the end, he goes:

 

“Do you want to meet me again? Do you want to talk to me again?”

 

I said:

 

“Absolutely! I really enjoyed this conversation.”

 

“Are you sure?”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I really enjoyed this conversation. I really enjoyed it. I would like to meet you again.”

 

And he said:

 

“Okay, well, what about next week?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Maybe not next week. I need a bit more time to digest this conversation. But maybe give me two weeks.”

 

He said:

 

“Okay, two weeks, Same time, same day.”

 

I’m like:

 

“Excellent!”

 

So this is my only human contact. I’m in a concrete box for two weeks straight. And then I meet up with him again. He walks in and he’s nervous. He’s so nervous! And he says:

 

“Tom, I have to be honest with you. I Googled your name. I thought I recognised you, but I Googled your name, and it was really hard for me to come in today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh! Why is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“Because, … There’s a lot of people in this prison, and they’ve really beautiful people that have done really horrible things. And I’ve never felt like this before where I felt selfish that I didn’t want to come in. But I prayed to God this morning, and I said God, I don’t want to talk to this man. I don’t like this man. I think this man is evil, and I don’t want to speak to him. What should I do? And what God told me was that’s why you have to go speak to him. Because he’s evil. Because he’s evil, you have to go speak to him. That’s why!”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, okay, all right.”

 

And then I said to him:

 

“You ever spoken to a paedophile?”

 

I said:

 

“Have you ever felt that way about a paedophile?”

 

And he was like:

 

“No, no. There are some really beautiful people in this prison. Some really beautiful people in this prison.”

 

“Never felt that way about a paedophile? Okay, interesting! Well, luckily, you are God’s slave, and that God forced you to come in here today to speak to me!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“I want to show you something. I want to show you my God! I want to show you my God!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, you want to show me your God?”

 

“Are you ready? Are you ready for my god?”

 

It’s this weird, passive aggressive, feminine. He’s got tears in his eyes. And he’s like:

 

“Before I do, can I ask you a question? Why did you want to speak with me?”

 

[1:46:16]

 

And I said to him:

 

“Because I told you the truth last time. My grandmother was an Anglican. I’m an Anglo Saxon. I ticked the Anglo box, not the Catholic box. Simple as.”

 

And he was like:

 

“But me specifically, did you know I was the Anglican priest. Me, personally?”

 

And I was like, I think his name was [changed]. And I was like:

 

“Leslie, I don’t know who you are. I just know that you’re an Anglican priest.”

 

He goes:

 

“You don’t know about my past?”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I don’t know. What is your past?”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, I want to tell you a story, Tom. You know, I had to take a stand against, … I mean, there’s a lot of evil men in the world., …”

 

And he’s talking like a lesbian. He speaks like a lesbian, right? He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of, …”

 

Like a feminist. He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of evil men in the world. And Donald Trump comes to mind, and Adolf Hitler comes to mind. And when I was younger, there was a man that came to power in Australia that reminds me of Donald Trump, and his name was John Howard. And when John Howard came to power, he had an immigration minister called Peter Dutton, who you might know, because he was running for prime minister recently. And they imprisoned people in concentration camps on, …”

 

I think it was like, Manus Island or something, one of these islands off the coast of Australia:

 

“And there were these people, these desperate, honest, loving, caring, they were God’s children, and they wanted to come to Australia, and they begged for our help and our safety. And they were refugees, …”

 

And he’s literally crying! He’s literally crying!:

 

“And we locked them and their children in concentration camps on these islands and treated them so horribly! And I had to make a stand, so I went and visited them!”

 

So he goes to the concentration camp and he’s like. [chuckling] He says:

 

“And I like painting. And I met this man, and he was a refugee, …”

 

And I think he was Iranian or Iraqi or something like that. I think Iraqi. And he goes:

 

“And I met this Iraqi man, and his name was Fadim, …”

 

Or some shit! And he goes:

 

“I said to him, you are so beautiful! You are such a beautiful man. Can I paint you? I want to paint you. Will you let me paint you?”

 

And then he said:

 

“Yes, I’ll let you paint me. And then I painted him.”

 

And it’s hot. It’s so weird! He’s holding a, he’s got like a, he’s got the, … Imagine this is the painting of the guy, but he’s got it like this, and he’s holding it on the table, and he’s holding it upside down. And he’s holding upside down on the table, and he’s like:

 

“I want to show you this. And the reason why I want to show you this is because when I was painting him, I looked into his eyes and he was crying. He had tears in his eyes as I was painting him. And I was painting him. And the whole time I was thinking about Jesus on the donkey going into Bethlehem as a refugee, needing safety. And I thought, this man is from that region. This man is from the same region, very similar region, near the Euphrates. And he’s a refugee as well., …”

 

You can predict the whole conversation, can’t you? Like, I’m drawing it out, but I’m drawing it out for effect. This was the tone this guy was taking with me.

 

“And I still remember. And I thought to myself, this is what Jesus would look like, and this is how Jesus would feel if he was here right now with us, seeing what John Howard, behaving in a fascist man manner, putting these innocent people in concentration camps! This is how Jesus would be looking at me. So I painted him. So I painted my God! This is my God, Thomas! This is my God!”

 

And then he shows me a painting of a brown man crying. And he’s like:

 

“This is my God! How do you feel?”

 

A picture of a brown man crying. And I was like:

 

“Fascinating! Fascinating! That’s your God?”

 

He’s like:

 

“I want you to have this. I want you to put this up in your cell.”

 

And I was like:

 

“No, no, I don’t want it. It’s your painting.”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, this is a copy of it. This isn’t the one I painted. This is a copy. I want you to have it. I want you to put this in your cell and I want you to look at my God! And I think that will really help you and I think that’s why I was sent here today to give you this painting.”

 

And I was like:

 

“It’s a decent painting. You’ve done a good job painting it, for sure. This is not my God! This is your God. This is not my God! I can’t put this in my cell. It’s just not my God! Not my God! There are many gods. This one’s not mine. This is your one!”

 

And [chuckling] that was the end of the conversation! And yeah, fuck, I’ve just had too much life experience at this stage! [chuckling]

 

[1:52:11]

 

And when I got out of jail, I’m gonna Google this church that this guy’s from. And it’s like gay flags and trans rights and refugees are welcome and all this shit!

 

And it’s like [chuckling] women pastors! These people, they’re sick! They make me sick! People in the chat saying, Jesus’ Italian. Man. A lot of, lot of Superchats to go through. Jeez. How much more do you want me to go, in a detail about that one? Oh, I don’t know what it is. It’s not dopamine, but it’s some sort of chemical. There’s some chemical in the brain. It’s just surreal! It’s like a surreal chemical. It’s not dopamine. It’s the surrealism of it. It’s the surrealism. Hyper, hyper, what do they call it? Hyper realism. How are these people real? They share this planet with us. What planet are they on?:

 

“I felt really bad for the magpies. That’s why I had to go back to the Church!”

 

Well, yeah, obviously you shouldn’t just like indiscriminately kill animals!

 

But what he was doing at 14 was what all 14 year old boys do, is they’re testing themselves. They’re seeing, can I do it? Can I do it? Can I put meat on the table? Can I put meat on the table?

 

And I said to him:

 

“Are you a vegetarian now?”

 

When he talked about the magpies, I said:

 

“Are you a vegetarian?”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, no, I’m not, but I make sure I thank God every time I have meat. And I thank God for what’s happened to the animal and pray for the animal.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, that’s fair enough. That’s good. I respect that.”

 

I have a lot of respect for that. I think that’s important when you take life and you’re consuming that life. Trans. The transmutation of it. Transubstantiation. Yeah. Like you’re putting meat on the table and you shouldn’t indiscriminately kill, but you’re doing what all teenage boys do when they’re going through puberty is they’re seeing not just if they can do it, but they go over the top. You know what I mean? They go a little, you go a little bit over the top and then you dial it back in. You’re like:

 

“All right, that was unnecessary.”

 

But he’s gone, he’s dialled it back in so much that his God is a brown man crying. That he has to live with White people!:

 

“He has to come live with the White people! He has to! We have to let them in! We have to!”

 

This is what his God wants. So look, obviously if you’re a Christian and you’re watching this, you would be disgusted by that story, that this is the calibre of priests. This is not Patriarchy. This is not the original church. This is not anything like the Greeks or the Romans or the Hebrews or even the jews. This is like the jews don’t even behave this way. This is like sub-Aryan and sub, even sub-Hebrew behaviour. And like ancient Hebrew, if we’re going to call it that. But this is like a completely poisoned chalice and these people are church leaders.

 

And so, yeah, it’s been completely infiltrated by communists. This is the downward path. They’re cherry picking document a book that has a lot in it.

 

As I said, the Bible’s a million things! There’s a million words in it. There’s a lot going on in that book. You can cherry pick whatever you want to articulate something, but what you can’t lie about is the general progression of themes and the general moral structure that the Bible is putting forward.

 

Now, is there, in my opinion, contradictions of the moral structure? I think there are some things that, and I’ve discussed them, I won’t go into them today. But you’ve all heard me say what I think is contradictory in there, within the moral, within the framing of a lot of things. And in short, I don’t like the story of Jacob and Esau. I don’t like that story.

 

Well, I mean, I don’t like the character! I don’t like the individual. And I don’t like the moral of that story. I think it is either miswritten or it’s not correct, it’s not right, it’s not fair, or there’s missing data, something’s missing from it. In my opinion. Like that would be the only way I could describe it as a moral story. Anyway. But the Bible’s full of that, of this kind of fight of morality. And you can see the schism of morality. You can see the schism of an ethnicity or the schism of a people are schisming, which is I guess one of the main themes of the whole text.

 

But if we just come back a little bit and we don’t talk about the Bible and Christianity, we just talk about the theme of Patriarchy, which is beyond just Christianity. I think that’s one thing the pagans and Christians can both agree on, is that we need Patriarchy.

 

And I think the Christian view is that women are inherently prone to an evil influence, just as men are, but that it infects the women first. And you can kind of see that with how giving women the right to vote and the late Enlightenment values of total, absolute human equality led to the suffragettes and led to women voting and led to first wave, second wave, third wave feminism that has come out of that structure. And we can see the damage that that has done to society. Anyone that can’t is obviously an idiot! But we can see the damage that it’s done. And yet women are also capable of fixing the situation. That’s also interesting.

 

As I said before, when I started women, more women voted for Adolf Hitler than men!

 

[1:58:41]

 

 

So that is a very redeeming quality when you realise that. Well, hang on a minute. Why? How could that possibly be? How could that possibly be? And what that might give a little bit of Credence to is this idea that when there is a strong leader, when there is a return of masculinity and a return of Patriarchy, women are actually more inclined to notice it than men. Women are more intuitive to the cure than men are. They’re more sensitive to the disease, but they’re more sensitive to the cure as well.

 

So I had a thought that ran through my head yesterday or the day before, which was, if we don’t contain women or restrain women, who will? Who’s going to? Because what we can see by the decline of the last hundred years of civilisation is we have removed the barriers, all barriers, every barrier possible, and said:

 

“No. Men and women are exactly the same!”

 

And we have done this to the detriment of women. We have not improved their life, and more importantly, we have not improved civilisation, and we have not improved the fucking mission. And the mission isn’t to make women happy. I want to make that very clear. That’s not the mission. It’s not to make men happy either. You know what this guy’s talking about? It’s like he accepted God because he wanted to be happy. That’s what Nietzsche talks about. That’s crazy! Well, it’s not crazy, but it’s like, that’s not why you should accept God. That’s selfish! That’s not the mission. Morale is not your happiness. It’s your willingness to fight. You have to fight for a mission. You have to fight for a purpose, for meaning.

 

And I believe you have to fight for life itself. Life is an upward struggle. And my religion, my personal religion is what my interpretation of Hitler’s religion is, which is that it’s about struggle into victory. And that these things aren’t necessarily steady states or acts of being, but they’re acts of becoming. Struggle is an act of becoming into victory, which is also an act of becoming.

 

So it’s never ending. It never ends. It’s like beyond time because God has to be above time. God can’t be subject to time because then he’s not God. So God is above time. So therefore, struggle and victory have to be conceived as being principles above time. That it’s like infinite struggle for infinite victory. It’s just like a yeah, it’s like you got a hail victory and you got a hail struggle. You got a hell struggle to hail victory! You know, which is a bit. Yeah, a bit different to:

 

“I just wanted to be happy! I just saw all these people around me and they were happy. And I just wanted to be happy. I just wanted to be a good person because I was a bad person!”

 

You know what? Yeah. [chuckling] Very different sense of moral structure and moral framework. So yes, Patriarchy, restraint, it’s about building a world that is driving towards this goal. And the relationship between men and women in that world is one built off respect, not pandering.

 

And so the issue with our society at the moment at a just socio-economic level with 50, 60% divorce rate, with the family courts tearing families apart like all the societal diseases we’ve got, is about, what they all come down to regarding the bad relationships between men and women and is that women have on average more respect for the government and more respect for the system, for the justice system or for the police than they do for their own husband and their own father. That’s the issue!

 

So a system needs to be built by husbands and fathers that form a collective, that form an organisation that are all on the same page with how they’re managing their family. It’s up to them how they manage their family. But they’re all roughly on the same page as to how they manage their family. A nation is a collection of families. It’s not a bunch of gay men masturbating into each other’s assholes and adopting kids. That’s not a nation. That’s just craziness! A nation is a bunch of families. You know, the family is the building block. This is not a meaningless platitude. It is the truth! You cannot have a nation without families. Because a nation is an extension of the family.

 

And so therefore the leader of a nation has to be the extension of the leader of a family. And the leader of the family is the father or the grandfather or the great grandfather, if he’s still alive. Like that is the leader of the family.

 

And that’s how society has always worked. And it’s a sacred, ancient, basically unwritten rule. I mean, we don’t even need to write this down. This is a reality.

 

And anyone that disagrees with that reality is our enemy. Because they disagree with it, because they care more about something else than making our society, our civilisation, our blood, our spirit, our life force, move upwards. They care about something else. They care about some sort of momentary happiness or some sort of:

 

“I want to feel good. I want to get along with everyone.”

 

Like this is their God, this is their God!

 

And so those people shouldn’t be given the same rights as the Patriarchs, as the people that acknowledge that:

 

“Hang on a minute. We’ve tried that. What it leads to is like millions of Indians and Arabs and Africans coming into our country and just like raping and pillaging and destroying it economically, socially, and sometimes unfortunately, physically.”

 

And these consequences are obvious. And we’re going to structure society in a way that this doesn’t happen going forward. So yeah, it’s non-negotiable. I’ll go through the comments and wrap up the stream.

 

[2:05:06]

 

Where are we? Where are we? Celine’s got another question. Just something about I don’t like Christians. Cool. Three story Rory:

 

“G’day, Thomas. What do you think about starting a petition for Joel Davis similar to one for Brandon Koschel? Chances of their release are low, but this activism can rally support and drive attention.”

 

A petition? I don’t understand what a petition is. Yeah, I’m not in the petition business because it doesn’t work. It doesn’t do anything. There’s a petition to deport me to New Zealand with a hundred thousand signatures, and yet here I am in Melbourne, Australia.

 

So look, the way we get Joel out of prison is either he’s released because the Supreme Court has a sense of the law and will enforce the law and the law says that he should be released from prison. And the Supreme Court follow through with that because the magistrates certainly don’t uphold the law. They’re activists. They’re political activists that do what the politicians tell them to do. That’s the only way to get him out of prison. Or we wait for the infinity amount of time he’s got to be in prison.

 

But yeah, sorry, a petition is not going to do anything. It’ll help raise awareness and that’s really the purpose of petitions. But no, I’m not in that business:

 

“Thank you for your sacrifices and bravery. God bless!”

 

Yep, thank you. A lot of comments. A lot of comments. Fanny Schrute says:

 

“Jesus was Italian.”

 

I think that’s the way to go. Someone gives me $100 for the cause:

 

“No need for acknowledgment.”

 

Thanks, mate. Celine’s got another one. Something about KGV, Shakespearean old English language. Stone Mountain:

 

“What are your thoughts on infidelity in women versus infidelity in men? And are our highly successful Chad man with multiple baby mothers a greater good or bad for society?”

 

Oh, that actually brings me to what I was meant to talk about the manosphere and stuff and we just end up talking about Christianity. Yes. That actually brings me to the second half of the stream, and we’ve been going for like two and a half hours. It’s crazy! This is madness, guys!

 

Yes, yes. Look, let me get a glass of milk. Let me get a glass of milk. And I have all these thoughts that I’m gonna put down. Because there’s just been so much chatter about the manosphere and looks maxing and Louis Thoreau’s recent thing. And I made a little post. Obviously most of you have probably already read my post, just explaining, the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read]. These people that are trying to embarrass the manosphere, which is quite easy, clearly. These people are not morally triumphant. These people are equally as bad, if not worse than the manosphere. And don’t get blindsided by this and fall into some trap where you’re going to take moral, what’s it called? Not legalisms, like lectures. Don’t take moral lectures from these freaks! These people are easily as bad, if not worse than the manosphere people. The manosphere people, a lot of them are not good people. I want to make it clear this next segment is not in defense of the manosphere. I’m not saying that. I’ll explain how you should accurately interpret why this phenomenon exists and how it needs to transmute into something much better. I’ll be back. I’ll just close this little thingy. Two minutes.

 

[2:11:12]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[3:41:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/28/2026 = 34)

DJTriumph
Supporter
18 hours ago
the James Mason podcast was great
11
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
FLmetalhead
12 hours ago
Where is it?
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
3
0

Jaymeo1
12 hours ago
Link ?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

eclipseNF
11 hours ago
Where is it?
1
0

baileyspunts
13 hours ago
Man i love when Sewell streams. White pill every time
11
0

LachlanMD
21 hours ago
L foids
6
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
19 hours ago
Nah. W foids
4
3

Jomaha22
20 hours ago
Every time I see that text “manosphere” I cringe. Where did this analogy came from? Ayn Rand male equivalent?
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
im guessing its the “every single time” crowd
2
0

christophawilkins
16 hours ago
hail
4
0

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
great to see another talk mate
3
0

squatmech
18 hours ago
There never anything wrong with the volume wtf is wrong with these people it’s like if you get kicked out of hundred bars but with low volume…
1
0

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
What’s the 5 hour stream where is it?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
eclipseNF
9 hours ago
Thanks a lot

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
whats gonna get too us 1st, terminator or mad max?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Mad Max. These fuel shortages are serious & AI cannot become conscious – it is built from outside-in, life evolves and self-builds from inside-out.

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
ive never heard of any abbos trying to claiming other abbo land that was taken in their tribal warfare, but the land whites took on the other hand will always be theirs??? and dna shows the have only been here for about 5000 years, coming from india and they were not the 1st people in australia, the originals were eaten by them.
1
0

TRUTH1488
11 hours ago
Where can I find that james mason podcast
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
1
0

Tax_Cow
VerifiedSupporter
5 hours ago
Our boomer parents have been hooked on the TV since childhood and they’ve been soaking up jewish propaganda for so long that they aren’t capable of independent thought. Despite whatever their friends and family say, what the TV says is the bottom line. Unwitting agents of our destruction, professing to be enlightened because they watch the talking heads on TV every night.
1
0

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Tom, im glad you still give Abos a chunk of land as their own country. African americans & native americans are similar. Thats the best way. I like wat you are doing but im softer on nons. I feel that at this point we may have to give all nons a chunk of western nations, as their own nation. Set cameras up and make documentaries on how they make a clean 1st world society to a 3rd world shithole. Juxtapose it with our first world living. This way we will document in 4D why we will never live with them again. We would play multiple weekly reality TV shows akin ‘Running Man’ & ‘Hunger Games’. This would change our culture. Then we will make museums to store these films and all the injustices we suffered with/from them. Especially the lil caps. Then maybe in the future we might decide to conquer them & retake the land, and put them where we want, maybe isntreal? Or put these brown masses in africa, or somewhere low on resources, since they cant mine them anyway. Tom, I also think 90%+ whyte is a good target. Because the good ones that help us have a reason to. But once we have control we can create policies to reduce their breeding over time: a white centred society; they will admire us or leave; we will be re-morale-ized; etc. If they dont want to accept it, they can always leave. Caramel island is an alternate choice for them too.
1
0

birdhouse456
15 hours ago
The problem with “where is the aboriginal land” is that their concept of it completely different to ours. We look at different metrics. They can’t just pick up and move their culture because it’s linked to place. If they don’t want to give that up they will be motivated to go to war regardless. Or, they’ll just be squeezed out and fade away, because once they are away from their territory the culture doesn’t function. Now we have a hybrid that succeeds at neither way. Maybe there can be agreement with some tribes but others will disappear completely. it’s similar to the clans of the Scottish Highlands. The culture survives, but it’s not what it was.

BossLurker
9 hours ago
Parasites and retards

BossLurker
9 hours ago
The whole “in the past they weren’t truly conservative they were only going off inertia” is actually an extremely good point

‹ Hide 1 reply
BossLurker
8 hours ago
Around 59:27

leibekohne
5 hours ago
Tom you have some criticism from USA NS bit-chute or odysee. The abos solution is good. I will give them a bare-bush land without any infrastructure, also they have to create own if needed financial system with own currency. This is about purity and recuperation of race thus Australia + has to be 100% white otherwise there will be no progress.Those idiots want to convert abos and save theirs lives but had no problem with murdering 35.000 white Boers woman and children. Cake destroyed Egypt Greek Roman empires by usury and by miscegenation. 1000 year of Romans were destroyed by 100 years of Christianity=Judaism 2.0= children blood drinking sacrificing cannibalism. Germany were destroyed in WW2 by another stupid and manipulated white men who should know better. White international unity.

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
56 minutes ago
Tom, I emotionally agree to boot out all leftists, or white antiwhites. But something for you to consider: Richard Spencer says that whites can build because we have all levels of people Elites, managerial class & working class. Dr Ed Dutton “white race functions like a bee hive”. So we might need to select the better ones and put in breeding policies to get them to their 15% balance. Because nearly all managerial class are leftists.

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
More and more blackpilled every single day
2
3

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
life is struggle mate, learn to laugh in the face of these demons and keep the sprits of our ancestors lovingly in your heart. heil victory
7
0

trvkvlt
2 hours ago
Thomas Sewell is my rabbi
0
1

drshreddie
6 hours ago
you need a better background, the baby blue with the books isnt working. How about a more masculine color with a NSDAP banner? I know this seems trivial but perception is a big deal and your message is important.
0
4

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Blair Cottrell: If this is really ordinary quality, let me know and I’ll figure something out. I’m just streaming through OBS because the streaming services are really fucking annoying trying to work them out! Am I just a Boomer or are they really fucking annoying? They say you can sign up for free and stream for like 20 hours free or something, but then you sign up and I can’t fucking work out how to actually stream. If it’s good enough quality, I’ll just stick with this. If it’s good enough for you guys. Can you hear me okay? Give me some feedback on the audio.

 

I don’t usually stream by myself. Haven’t streamed by myself in probably three years. It makes me realise actually how much I was hinging off Joel’s initiative because I would just respond to Joel’s invitations. I wouldn’t set anything up. I don’t know how streaming works.

 

Okay, great! If the video and audio seems okay for you guys. God, every time before a stream starts, I can think of a hundred reasons not to do it. And I’m like, even when I was streaming with Joel.

 

But as I was saying, I was really hinging off Joel’s initiative because Joel had the Streamyard account. He understood how to set it up. He would just send me a link and I would just show up. That’s why I was always fine with Joel taking all the money that was raised through the streams. I didn’t care because he was the one who came up with all the talking points and did most of the talking as well.

 

But I’m basically just responding to requests that I should stream because he’s in jail now and people are used to seeing me on with Joel and they’re not getting their weekly fix of the Joel and Blair Show, right? Where else could I share the link for this? Is Gab still a thing? Does anyone use Gab? All the alternative platforms? [chuckling] I’m still completely banned from X. I was never emailed explaining why I was banned. If you ask Grok, X’s AI system why I was banned, it’ll come up with, oh, no, that’s not right. Hang on. It’ll give you some arbitrary reason about neo-Nazism, but they won’t give you an actual reason because there’s no reason accept ideology.

 

And I suppose that’s what I’ll begin talking about, ideology. Because that’s why Joel Davis is in jail! And that’s why pretty much everyone influential in nationalism is going to jail. Everyone’s going to jail1 Everyone you can think of in Australian nationalism will go to jail, myself included. They’re going to lock us up! And it was always going to happen. That’s not being black-pilled. That’s just observing things as they unfold. It’s just the objective reality.

 

Joel’s not in jail because of anything he said necessarily. No one was hurt. There’s been no serious crime committed. He’s been held in prison for ideological reasons. It’s pretty obvious, right?

 

I was thinking about playing the game that I usually play when I stream with Joel, so you guys could see what game I play. But I thought it might be too distracting. Usually it’s really helpful. It assists my thinking process to do something with my hands while I’m listening. Much to the dismay of school teachers. I was always told by school teachers that because I was scribbling on a book, I must not be listening. But actually it helped me to listen more. Can anyone relate to that? I found if I was looking at a schoolteacher as a kid, if I was watching the teacher while they said something, I was too busy picking up, like, intuitive signals, like facial expression, body language. I was reading how much they believed in what they were actually saying, whether or not they were feeling bored. All of that was coming through to me.

 

So in order to actually listen to the words they were speaking, not looking at them was important. Because if I was looking at the teacher, all I was getting was like, body language and facial expression signals, like intuitive signals. It was hard to listen to what the teacher was actually saying. Usually because teachers don’t believe what they’re saying. They’re just regurgitating bullshit from textbooks, right?

 

So here I was just scribbling in my book, trying to listen, and I’d be reprimanded for it. Obviously, I’m not listening if I’m scribbling in my book!

 

But it’s the same sort of situation when streaming with Joel or anybody else. I need to be doing something else in order to listen effectively.

 

Down? What am I down about? I’m not down. How do I seem down to you? Do I seem down in the dumps? Because I don’t really experience depression or any down sensation. To be honest, every day I wake up and I’m not surrounded by cops, every day I wake up and I don’t get dragged off to prison for hate speech or just some ideological reason, every day I’m not set up on charges and put in jail, it’s a great day! I get to be free for one nore day. That’s how I live my life. So I’m happy to be here, guys! [chuckling] I’m happy to still not be in jail despite believing the wrong things.

 

Yeah, I feel like I’m always pretty happy. I tend to be either happy or really angry! I kind of switch between those two states of emotion. It’s important that I’m kind. I have to make a strong effort to be kind because the alternative is not a great thing! Hasn’t produced great results for me. [chuckling]

 

Yeah, it does suck that Joel’s in jail. Did you guys see the article? I’ll actually post it here, if I can find it first. Hang on. Where? I sent it to a friend. Here it is here. Mainstream media creating paywalls, like expecting people to pay to read the shit that they write. Imagine paying for the Herald Sun or the Daily Mail! Check out that link there. If you guys haven’t read that already. We’ll go through this together actually.

 

[08:24]

 

Actually, if you guys are on your computer, phone, whatever, click this link. It should take you to a Daily Mail article. We have to use this link to get around the paywall because we’re not paying the Daily Mail to read this shit!:

 

“Crushing legal blow for the Bondi Nazi as we track down his girlfriend after she welcomed their first baby or first child while he was behind bars!”

 

The essence of this article is basically, should I bring it up on screen share? Does that make it better for everybody? It probably does, right? Let’s see if I can figure that out. What I’ve got to do is Joel usually does this stuff. What I’ve got to do is, I think, display capture.

 

Actually, I’m not going to bring it up on the screen because it has pictures of Joel’s girlfriend or the mother of Joel’s child. To be honest, I know so little about this relationship that I don’t know whether to suggest this is Joel’s girlfriend. So I’m just going to say this is the mother of his first child. And the pictures taken of her were taken without her knowledge or consent. How’s this? Right? How do we live in a country where a bunch of people with cameras can find out where you live, go out the front, go and wait out the front of your house indefinitely and just sit there taking photos of you and your house. You come out to put the trash out, they’re taking photos of you. They’re sitting there stalking you, waiting for you! Then they publish those photos publicly with personal information about where you live, personal circumstances about your family, your children. They publish all that publicly, and there’s no consequence. That’s really confusing to me.

 

There should be brutal consequences for doing that to someone’s family. Brutal consequences, man! I think it would do the mother of Joel’s child at disservice to share that article. But you guys can read it for yourself if you want. I just think it’s very disrespectful to hide behind bushes and take photos of someone’s partner. She’s just had a baby and you’re stalking her. That’s fucking weird, man! Who are these fucking journalists, actually, who wrote this article? I noticed some journalists don’t even put their names to their articles anymore.

 

Lucy Manley. Who’s Lucy Manley? I suppose I better be careful about what I say because I could be eroding. What am I doing? What are we all doing? We’ve been labelled “Nazis”, right? Everybody who’s ethnically White and believes that is significant and not negative. We’re all Nazis! And what are we doing?:

 

“We’re eroding the social fabric!”

 

Is that what that federal copper said? I’ve got to be careful because something I say may contribute to the erosion of the social fabric! Lucy Manley, senior news reporter.

 

To be honest, she probably didn’t take the pictures. It probably wasn’t Lucy Manley sitting at the front of this girl’s house, but she still publicly posted all this information. I suppose this is just like how paparazzi works, right? You can understand why people in Hollywood just hate journalists so much because they don’t have any respect. They’re like vultures.

 

But I think it’s always been that way, hasn’t it? It’s not really a new thing. I just didn’t expect this to happen so suddenly. Like, if you guys think about it for a moment, right? Joel is notorious for pushing boundaries with the language he chooses to use. Racial slurs are just part of Joel’s regular vocabulary, regular dialogue. I don’t think what he wrote on Telegram about that “rhetorical rape” comment, I don’t think that’s the worst thing he said in the past few years. I think he said worse stuff than that on streams. I actually think if he made that comment, the one he’s supposedly in jail for, if he made that comment, like, four or five months ago, I don’t think anyone would have bat an eyelid. I don’t think anyone would have cared. It would have just been standard Joel Davis. Because it is standard Joel Davis to say stuff like that isn’t it?

 

Everything’s just taken a dramatic shift since the government seems to have become very sensitive and frightened about this White Australia political party. The Home Affairs Minister after deporting that civil engineer guy, Matthew. What was his name? Matthew Gutter or Guther? [Matthew Gruter] He arrived back in South Africa recently. But Tony Burke said:

 

“If they’re going to put their numbers to the test (he’s referring to the White Australia party or community), then they will fail spectacularly!”

 

If that is true, then why not just let them put their numbers to the test and watch them fail? Why is it necessary for all the political policing and to put them in prison and to make laws that they can’t even express their ideology freely? If you’re so sure they’re going to fail when they put their numbers to the test democratically, why all the political policing? Why the aggression? I suppose political bureaucrats aren’t so sure that they’re going to fail spectacularly! They want to manipulate the system to make sure they fail, I guess.

 

I should solo stream more often. The problem is I don’t really like it, bro. I don’t think I like it anyway. Usually I get about half an hour in and I’m done. Maybe I’m fully like ADHD brain or something. It’s not that I don’t like streaming, it’s just before I’m about to start doing it, I can just think of more efficient things I can do.

 

Like right now I’m working on a video course which is going to be the primary product that I’ll be offering for my online coaching service.

 

[16:12]

 

But I want to make sure it’s an extremely good, polished product. What it basically is I’m thinking about every problem someone will have with getting their diet and their training right and I’m trying to solve those problems for the viewers, for people who actually download this product. I want to solve all your problems for you. I want it to be very good! And I’ve been working on that in my spare time. That’s just one of the things I can think of that I would rather do instead of stream. But I feel a bit of a duty, I suppose, to produce some stream content since you guys would usually watch Joel and enjoy what he’s saying.

 

Thanks for the donations, by the way. I don’t know how to access money through Rumble. I’ve never done it before. I don’t expect that it’s a good idea for me to try to extract any money from Rumble. My Australian bank account will probably just get deleted if I do that. I can tell you from experience, any money that comes from any overseas source, when you’re an Australian and you’re into ethnic nationalism like I am, your bank account just gets frozen and deleted, straight away, pretty much within a week of receiving the funds or before the funds actually clear. God, how many bank accounts have I lost? I don’t even know, I don’t remember.

 

But I think I was the first guy in Australia to have his bank accounts deleted because of his ideology. And now it’s just like a standard thing. Now it just happens every day to someone for some stupid reason. Maybe I should have tried to sue the bank or something to create a precedent. The problem is I’m not a court guy. I don’t want to go to court. I don’t want to take people to court and stand there and complain to a judge, you know, I’d rather just headbutt someone! Do you understand what I mean? I would rather just headbutt someone and crush their skull if I have a problem with them. I do not want to stand in court and say:

 

“Your honour, this person, blah blah, blah, I’m right, they’re wrong, please believe me. Have my money, have more of my money. $10,000, $20,000. Please rule in my favour, your honour!”

 

That’s really fucking gay in my mind! I can’t bring myself to do it. But that’s how the system works. If you don’t have money and if you don’t grovel to judges with a lot of money, well, you really don’t get anywhere, do you?

 

We have a problem in society though, don’t we? In post violence society. Everything still happens the same way it would when violence was a main feature of society. It just happens non-violently. So you still get humiliated, you still get targeted, people still get assassinated. It just happens socially and politically rather than physically. The problem with that though is everyone is just treating each other like shit because there’s no immediate physical consequence anymore. No one’s worried about getting their teeth knocked out. Nobody’s worried about getting their jaw broken and having to drink their food through a straw for three months. If people were worried about that, as they should be, everyone would be more kind. Everyone would be nice to each other. We would just have a more, how should I suggest? It would just be a more enjoyable place to live. It’d be a more tolerable place to live because everyone would be naturally kind for fear of having their jaws broken.

 

Everyone just does whatever they want because:

 

“Oh, you can’t touch me. That’s against the law. That’s a salt and pepper!”

 

That’s [chuckling] another aspect of modern society which is really gay.

 

Yeah. Interesting question, Oznat News:

 

“Do I have any comment on the Brisbane crew splitting from March for Australia? One of the organisers name dropping me.”

 

I have no idea what’s going on with that! No idea! Whenever there’s like drama and people are arguing and splitting and you know what I mean, I just back the fuck out! I can’t deal with that petty gay drama and people saying words because they don’t like each other online. It’s not my style at all, bro. I don’t know anything about that. I can’t comment. I don’t know why everyone can’t just have a rally against immigration. Like, shut up about this evil caricature of Nazis that everyone’s obsessed with. Just get over it. Have a rally to stop immigration. The subject shouldn’t be Nazis. Anyone who’s trying to divert the attention of the people interested in the rally to Nazis instead of the purpose of the rally, which is stopping immigration. They are an enemy of your country. They are a fucking enemy of your country! Everyone should just have a rally against immigration. Stop immigration! Anyone saying Nazis, they’re an enemy, ignore them.

 

The Nazis appear to be public enemy number one for the government in Australia right now! But what is that? What is a Nazi? What do you guys think? I mean, for the standard person, when you say the word “Nazi”, a certain image of something undesirable appears in your mind. That word “Nazi” is associated with genocide, is it not? Like the killing of large amounts of people through gassing and systemic execution of various kinds. But is that what history really tells us? And see, this is the issue.

 

I’ll tell you guys a story, right? I was at the gym yesterday doing some leg press and a guy approached me. And this happens all the time now. [chuckling] He’s about 6 foot 7, this guy. He’s really tall, but he’s only young. He tells me:

 

“Hey man, you look familiar.”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I get that a bit.”

 

And I outstretched my hand to shake his hand because he was just kind of staring at me. And he gave me a Roman handshake. And I’m thinking:

 

“Okay, this is one of the boys.”

 

And I noticed he’s wearing a T-shirt with a stencil of Hitler on it. This guy tells me he’s 18. For the last few years, he’s just been researching online and he’s on this trajectory. He discovers National Socialism and he explains it as just the truth! That’s what he says to me. He says:

 

“Mate, it’s just the truth! I don’t even see it as a philosophy necessarily. It’s just the truth of this world and how things are.”

 

And that’s when I realised, because this keeps happening, like young people keep approaching me and talking to me about stuff like this. Either they recognise me or they don’t. It’s literally just a subject matter in the public right now! It made me realise why the Australian government is trying to ban social media for people under 16 years old. The government will say it’s “for your safety”. [chuckling] Can you believe they’re still trying to sell that?

 

[22:27]

 

The fact that the government does anything for your safety. Like, imagine actually believing that! I suppose it’s comfortable to believe that if you’re a standard person:

 

“Government trying to protect me, keeping me safe. Thanks government!”

 

God, imagine actually believing that! Imagine buying into that, man. It freaks me out to think that people actually buy into that.

 

But anyway, the social media ban is, again, it’s about ideology, isn’t it? Because Hitler seems to have become this core feature of youth culture. A large section of the youth either think that Hitler wasn’t that bad or that he’s been lied about a great deal and he’s an interesting character. Like a massive amount of Generation Z, the Zoomers, they believe, they’re straight up. That’s what they believe to the extent where they’re in the gym, in a public gym, wearing Hitler T-shirts, and just talking to people about Hitler. I mean, you might think that this guy that approached me is unusual, but it doesn’t seem that way. It really doesn’t seem that way. It seems like these kids are everywhere.

 

And I think that’s what the social media ban in Australia is about. It’s about preventing new generation from accessing the nuance which leads to an appreciation for National Socialism and Hitler. Fundamentally that seems to be what it’s about.

 

Because the problem is, because I’ve read the Hitler’s book many times. To be honest, the first time I read it, I was really disappointed. When I saw it, I’m like, wow! I was only 18 when I first found it in a random bookshop in Fitzroy, which is a northern suburb of Melbourne. I was working there on an apartment building. I bought the book and was excited because I thought I was going to read, I was going to learn about the inner workings of this evil genius who mass murdered all of these jews and tried to take over the world. But then I’m reading the book and I’m like:

 

“Huh? There’s nothing in here about that!”

 

Okay. There’s a chapter on his early life, his service in the First World War, how propaganda works. Wow, that’s interesting. About race and how nation and race mean the same thing. How he wants to protect the Germans. Okay. There’s a bit in here about how the jews represent a threat to Germany.

 

And then there’s just a whole bunch of stuff on foreign policy. And I’m like:

 

“Where’s the genocide? Where’s the evil genius take over the world part? It’s not in here!”

 

But someone who’s still linked in with the Matrix might say:

 

“Well, of course he’s not going to admit that in his book, Blair. Otherwise, no one would have voted for him!”

 

Maybe you’re right. I don’t think that’s how it is.

 

But anyway, the reason I brought that up, because it is because in Hitler’s book, he writes. And first I’ll quote it word for word, then I’ll explain what he means. But he writes:

 

“As soon as an atom, or a glimpse of right is admitted on the opposing side, the process of doubting one’s preconceived ideas begins.”

 

I’ll repeat that so it sinks in. Right:

 

“As soon as an atom, or a glimpse of right is admitted on the evil side, or the side, the opposing side, the designated enemy side, then the process of doubting or beginning to doubt your own existing belief system begins.”

 

What does that mean? It means it is very important that an administrative government does not allow you to access any information which helps you understand the point of view of your enemy. You’re not supposed to understand your enemy’s point of view at all! You’re supposed to reject it as incontrovertibly evil! The moment any nuance is available to you that allows you to understand things from an enemy or opposition perspective, and the moment you’re actually able to understand even one thing that the enemy believes, the moment you’re able to sympathize with even one thing that the previously or an enemy stood for, a previously understood enemy stood for.

 

[26:59]

 

The moment you acknowledge that one thing an enemy did or represented was actually not that bad, then your whole worldview starts to tip. You eventually start to sympathize with an enemy, and you start to see what your previous beliefs were. You start to see them as potentially evil. That’s why when politicians talk about Nazism, they will not include even the slightest bit of nuance, ever! It will always be absolutely incontrovertibly evil! They will always associate Nazism with genocide, regardless of the facts. They will always reject Nazism as not even a real philosophy, but just a caricature of evil itself. Nazism and Hitler are evil incarnate, and you’re not supposed to look at it any other way. If you do, that’s a problem. And social media and the Internet, the age of the Internet has made it not only possible, but easy to see things from Hitler’s perspective. And the results you can see for yourself. It’s a whole fraction of the new generation which actually thinks that Hitler was the good guy, or maybe not even that bad. That’s like, some of them think he’s not that bad. The rest of them think:

 

“Oh, he’s actually the good guy!”

 

Right? That’s what happens when you allow free information, when you allow nuance. And naturally, if people start thinking that Hitler wasn’t that bad, then they end up thinking Hitler’s enemies might actually be bad. The people who oppose Hitler might actually be the bad ones. And that’s the mess that the social media system has created for the existing government. It’s allowed this nuance, which has transformed the perspective of the new generation. People are just kind of running wild with this whole new idea of recent history.

 

To summarize what I’ve said, just to wrap that up, there is a reason you will never hear a single government bureaucrat acknowledge that anything Hitler ever did, that anything the German National Socialist ever did was good. They will never acknowledge National Socialism even as a legitimate political ideology. They will always hold it up as evil incarnate. And they have to do that, because if they’ll contribute to a process where people begin to sympathize with National Socialism. Because that’s the way human psychology works. Everything is either good or evil. It’s either black or White. And the minute you allow nuance to enter that equation, everything begins to tip in the other direction. Black becomes White and good becomes evil. It’s really interesting process. And long story short, that’s what the social media ban is about, because all of the nuance, like, I’ll open up Instagram on my phone right now, for example, and I’ll see, let’s say three videos.

 

The first one will be about. It’ll be some girl who’s like 23 years old talking about how the Holocaust is just what they said happened with the Holocaust is logistically impossible. Then the next video will be about how the government murdered X amount of people with vaccines, how it caused heart conditions, nervous system disorders and premature deaths in infants.

 

And then the next video will just literally be a clip glorifying Hitler. That’s on Instagram right now! Like that’s what young people are being exposed to. 10 years old, 11 years old. Well, prior to the social media ban anyway. And that’s created a serious problem for administrative government, because all of that is going to undermine the dominating ideology of society right now, which is multiculturalism. It’s like the opposite ideology of National Socialism.

 

National Socialism represents the opposite to the current system ideology. It’s the opposite of multiculturalism. It’s the opposite of racial equality. Right. And that’s why people are in jail. That’s why Joel Davis is in jail. That’s why we’re all basically going to jail sooner or later. If you’re an influential person in ethnic nationalism, myself included, at some stage in the next year or two, the police are going to kick your door down at 4 in the morning. They’re going to take your computer, they’re going to set you up with some bullshit and put you in jail for political reasons, ideological reasons, because you represent a threat to the dominating ideology within government, media and police right now!

 

But, it can’t be any other way. I mean, just look at it the way it is. Put yourself in the position of the enemy and understand that they’re ruthless savages! They don’t give a fuck about your rights. You don’t have any rights. I’ve got no rights. I’ve got the right to die quietly and get replaced by Indians. That’s the way the government looks at it. That’s my foremost right as a White Australian. It’s to fucking shut up and die and get quietly replaced by an Indian family. One that won’t give this government as much trouble as we do. [chuckling] And that’s your right too. If you share my ethnicity and my viewpoints. That’s about as many rights as this government affords you right. Now if you think I’m wrong, just give it some time, man!

 

What can you do about it? Not a lot for the time being, I suppose. Like I said, every day I wake up where a gang of coppers haven’t kicked my door down and aren’t accusing me of some shit to put me in jail. That’s another good day. It was always going to come to this, though. It was always going to come to this:

 

“Have I thought about entering politics?”

 

In what capacity? Like, because I feel like I’ve been in politics for the last 11 years. Do you mean like official political process, like getting voted for and whatnot?

 

Of course I’ve thought about it, but it’s not really possible. You’ll find that Australian system is so corrupt, they’ll put you in jail before you can get to Parliament. But that’s part of a process that I think we need to pass through, that Australians need to pass through in order to work out or adapt to that environment, to work out a way where we can stay out of prison and actually arrive in Parliament somehow. I don’t know. I don’t like the idea of a Parliament. I’ll tell you right now!

 

[33:38]

 

I mean, look at Parliament. What is Parliament? It’s a group of hysterical women screeching about racism or other interpersonal nonsense which doesn’t actually matter. And if it’s not that, then it’s a group of men taking money from foreign lobbyists, climbing over each other to try to prove who can fill Australia with more immigrants faster. That’s what Parliament is! It’s just a snake den! It’s a rat’s nest! And anyone who goes into Parliament with good intentions will find that they have to become a snake, or a rat, in order to survive in that environment. I think we need to do away with Parliament as a country. It might be fun for someone like Joel to sit in Parliament because Joel really enjoys debating, doesn’t he? I mean, Joel thrives when he’s in an environment where he gets to argue his point with people who don’t like him. That’s why I think Joel would be excellent in Parliament.

 

But personally, I think I would get too frustrated by Parliament. I think I’m good at doing what I do now, which is just influencing from my small corner, what do you call people like me? Micro influencers? And I provide people with advice. I’m an advisor. I’m an advisor in the shadows. [chuckling] But I’m not really in the shadows, am I? I’m pretty public right now!

 

To be honest, since everything that’s happened in Australia over the past couple of months, like Joel going to jail, stacks of criminal charges being laid against activists left, right and centre, you know, nationalist activists, the Federal Police seemingly being converted into a political police, an ideological policing unit to prevent nationalism from taking hold. I’m not even sure what I should say! Like, I go to post something on Telegram and I’m thinking:

 

“Fuck, what can I even write that won’t just land me in prison right now?”

 

I don’t even know. I’m not really sure. The culture’s changed so quickly that I’m not really sure if I should write anything at all!

 

But then I think to myself:

 

“I’m probably going to go to jail anyway. So fuck it! I’ll just keep writing what I think. I’ll just keep doing what I’ve always done.”

 

All right, how far in are we? How long have I survived so far? I don’t think I can see. Oh, no, I can. No, I can’t see how long I’ve been streaming because I’m just streaming through OBS. I’m not using any of the streaming services. I couldn’t work them out man. I’m just going to close this blind. It’s like some brutal sun glare coming through there. Is that better or worse? Maybe I’ll open it again. Wow! Survived longer than half an hour. That’s nice.

 

Well, thanks for the appreciation, guys. Thanks for joining me. What else was there? There was another article or two that I wanted to discuss with you guys because there’s just been so much going on in Australia for the past couple of weeks, and I spend most of my time working and trying to, what do you call it? Trying to build this online coaching business. So my head hasn’t been as into the news as it should be. It’s like I have one day off. I get like a Sunday afternoon off every week, and that’s the time where I try to catch up on the news and what’s been happening.

 

I saw that Tom Sewell was streaming with, is it called the Fight Back podcast with Blizzerian and Jake Shields? That should be interesting. Isn’t it crazy The Times we’re living in where you can open a social media app and you got Dan Blizzerian talking about how Israel is the most evil thing in the world. And that guy is like, that guy’s watched by a lot of people. He’s someone who’s quite wealthy, according to my understanding.

 

Yeah, I know people want to speak to me about March for Australia, Queensland. Like I said, I’ve got no idea what’s going on with that. I know that there’s drama and there’s people on X who are like, and I don’t even know what’s happening.

 

As I said, I don’t know why everyone can’t just have a rally about a single issue. Single issue rallies are really easy! Anyone trying to complicate it to make it about something other than that single issue, in this case, stopping immigration. They’re an enemy. They’re an enemy! It’s that simple. Just keep them out, get away from them, don’t let them in, don’t let them anywhere near the organisation of the rally itself. Just stick to that one issue. It’s that simple! The moment someone says:

 

“Oh, but there’s Nazis over there!”

 

Shut the fuck up! Shut the fuck up! It’s about stopping immigration. It’s not about Nazis. Simple! Why can’t people figure that out? It’s like it requires the same kind of mental strength that is necessary to ignore arguing with people, or to not argue with people. Which is like when someone’s trying to compel you to argue with them, you literally just ignore them and go about whatever it is you’re doing. You learn to do that in politics. You have to be able to do that in politics. If you can’t ignore what people are saying, you’ll always be dragged into dirty little corners of tit for tat that are just going to waste your time. You have to be able to actually not care what people are saying. You have to actually be amused at people trying to derail you or detract you from your single purpose.

 

Politics is really simple and easy. You just have to stay on that one narrow, single purpose goal route. Very easy! It’s actually the stupidest business in the world, politics. I think Napoleon said that, because you’re literally in the business of influencing simpletons who really want and desire that one train of thought system, that one message that us against them dynamic. And the moment you make it more complicated than that with arguing about ideology and stuff, then you’re basically cooked. No longer are you appealing to the ordinary folk. You just need to keep things simple. It’s really easy.

 

[40:59]

 

 

I noticed I’m being called a “White supremacist” now in the press whenever I’m mentioned. I don’t know why I’m still being mentioned. I haven’t hosted or attended a protest in the capacity of actually participating in it in quite a while. All I do is appear on stream occasionally as a result of being invited onto it, but I still get mentioned in media articles on occasion. And I’m now White supremacist! I used to be far-Right activist, then I was far-Right extremist. Then I was accused neo-Nazi. Then they just took the word accused out and started saying neo-Nazi.

 

And now it’s neo-Nazi, but also White supremacist. It’s interesting, isn’t it? Because I’ve never actually described myself as White supremacist. It’s all very dirty language, curse language, designed to make you look, you know, evil, undesirable. Don’t listen to this person. What a horrible man. [chuckling] It’s probably illegal. I actually know that it is illegal. A former colleague of mine, Dennis Hutz, who was quite close to us during our early years of activism with United Patriots Front. I don’t know if it was Channel Seven or Channel Nine. It was one of the major media corporations, but they just called him a White supremacist after he did some sort of political activity. It was a stunt or something. He issued a legal notice or something like that opened up a lawsuit. And they settled with him before the court date. And they paid him out I don’t know, somewhere between 50 and $70,000. So he got a payout because they called him White supremacist without any basis.

 

I wonder what the basis for calling me a White supremacist is? It’s guilt by association, isn’t it? It’s because I’ve streamed or sat on a panel with people who might accept that identity. I don’t know. But what does White supremacist entail as well? It’s like if someone calls you White supremacist, right, what that means to the ordinary mind is they think that you’re the kind of person who walks around and just thinks you’re superior to everyone because you’re White. Like, it would mean that I would just walk past a Chinaman or something like that and just hate this person because he’s Chinese and not White. It’s like, imagine going through life like that. Imagine how exhausting that would be to have to hate everyone around you just because they’re not White all the time.

 

I mean, I’ve never really felt that way. To be honest, I don’t really feel anything towards people who aren’t White. I don’t really have any room to feel anything for them. It’s not like they’re not significant to me in any way. I don’t really live in a place where there’s a lot of people who aren’t White. So being a White supremacist is not really something that’s ever occurred to me. I’ve never really thought of myself that way.

 

But apparently Australian journalists, mainstream media journalists, they know more about me than I do! [chuckling] they get to decide my ideology and how to describe me, regardless of the facts. And that’s the country we live in, ladies and gentlemen. It’s also a country where you go to jail if you write the wrong thing on Telegram.

 

And if you go to a protest, a police approved protest, you don’t commit any crimes. You’re even a highly regarded civil engineer. And you’ve been in Australia for years without committing any crimes. But you went to one protest for ideological reasons the government doesn’t like, you’re getting deported! You’re out of here within a day or two. Well, I don’t think he was actually out of here within a day or two, but I know that he ended up in immigration detention within a day or two. God, that’s crazy, man! I don’t think that’s ever happened in the history of Australia. I actually tried to find another situation where someone was deported, like taken to immigration and deported that quickly. Not even serious rapists and murderers. No one in the history of this country has been apprehended and deported along with his family that fast! That’s never happened before.

 

Think about what that means. It means that a whole new precedent of political policing is now occurring in Australia. And it means everyone who was influential in nationalism is bound to go to jail at some point or another. That is the logical mathematical conclusion! So brace yourselves!

 

Like I said I was gonna play a game. I was gonna play a game for you guys that I usually play with Joel. You know what’s funny? Someone said in the comments on one of the last streams that I did with Joel before he was in jail, someone said:

 

“Oh, Blair’s losing hope! Blair’s so black pilled he’s even started playing a game while streaming with Joel. He’s not serious anymore!”

 

I thought to myself, bro, I’ve been playing a game while streaming with Joel for like three years. I just didn’t say anything because I thought maybe it’s rude.

 

[46:13]

 

But now I’m just being honest because it kind of explains why sometimes I’m a bit distracted. But that’s how I listen. As I explained at the start of the stream, I listen by doing something else with my hands. And so like some people do that. Some people need to be able to like do something else in order to intake information effectively. Like if I’m just sitting there staring at the screen, I get bored. It’s hard for me to actually listen. It’s easy to listen if I’m doing something else.

 

It is World of Warcraft hardcore, but it’s a private server called Turtle Wow! You guys know what that is? It’s like, how would you describe it? It’s like classic. Plus, it’s the original World of Warcraft, but it’s had all this additional content bolted on. It’s even got new raids and new dungeons, but it’s all at level 60. Because you can only play Classic World of Warcraft or Vanilla so many times before you know every single weapon that drops, every single item that drops. The good thing about Turtle Wow is its got like an array of new items and weapons and quests that you’ve never seen before added into places like Westfall and Elwyn Forest, and all the early human starting zones and beyond. There’s whole new zones as well. And it’s all based on what Blizzard was going to release with the original Vanilla, but they didn’t end up releasing it because they didn’t have enough manpower or time to actually implement those things into the game. But the original World of Warcraft, the original vanilla, that came out in like 2004, I think, or 2000, 2003, when I was like 13 or 14, it was basically an unfinished game.

 

If you look at the way the classes were set up, it wasn’t finished. Mage was finished, Rogue was finished, Warrior was kind of finished. The other classes weren’t finished and the game wasn’t finished, but they released it anyway and it still became an international phenomenon.

 

But it’s an easy game to play while you’re streaming because you don’t need to pay that much attention to it. It’s not a game like Doom Eternal, for example, where God, I’m like, that game requires 100% of your attention.

 

Nick Patterson. I don’t want to talk about individuals. I don’t want to talk about individuals. It’s not my style. What could I say, though in summary? I think Nick’s doubling down on his support for Israel because he probably got bullied for supporting Israel. And some people, when you bully them, they actually double down on what you’re bullying them for. That’s the way they respond. He’s probably copped a lot of shit online for being a bit of an attack dog for Avi Yemeni and the Israeli crew.

 

But eventually he’s going to realise, guys, eventually, you can’t stay ignorant forever. Eventually, Nick Patterson will realise that he’s not jewish and the jews laugh at him when he’s not there. Avi Yemeni would go home and laugh at him. He’s going to work it out eventually. It’ll just take him a bit more time. Bullying probably won’t work. Doesn’t work on everyone, bullying. Well, there’s probably a process people go through, but everyone’s different.

 

So the next March for Australia event is on Australia Day, is that right? It’s like everyone seems to be gearing up for Australia Day. Ever since the original March for Australia, there’s been some drama, hasn’t there? And it all seems to be, at the centre of that drama, seems to be this whole Nazi debacle! Like you’re sort of Zionist-conservatives trying to Reclaim Australian patriotism from the Nazis. That seems to be the main crux of the issue. I honestly just think it should be ignored and everyone should just get together again for the next march, like I said, for that single issue thing. If you consider yourself a conservative, if you consider yourself a Christian, even if you’re like a Zionist conservative Christian, if that’s still actually a thing, it shouldn’t be. But even if you are, if that’s what you consider yourself, or even if you’re a Nazi, or a regular Australian patriot or whatever, these are all just words! You’re just saying things.

 

At the end of the day, you’re still part of the same cultural, ethnic community. Like, just look at each other. It’s easy to tell who is one of us and who is not. And you should be, in my opinion, we should be united on that basis, not the basis of word identities. Like, I’m centre Right conservative and I’m far-Right Nazi and I’m centre kind of I don’t even know, like, what is this? It’s all just words. The political spectrum is just words. This is people saying words, making noises with their mouth, which, how is that more of an identifying factor than how we look, how we think and where we come from physically and biologically? To me, it’s just like I can tell who’s on my side and who’s not usually just by looking at them. That’s the way I tend to approach politics.

 

But apparently everybody’s more intelligent than me because they invest a great deal more in their political spectrum identities. That makes you smarter than anyone who’s using biology as an identifying factor first. It’s embarrassing how the tendency people have to believe they’re super intelligent can actually confuse the fuck out of them and can actually take them away from their fundamental identity because they’re so invested in the idea of their own intelligence that they end up identifying with something that is completely alien to their own biological identity because they’re so smart, right? They spend all of their time thinking about how to verbalise or structure their identity and how to explain it to people. I don’t know. I’ve always just thought, like, being a White Australian is not like a big deal. Well, it’s not a bad thing is what I’m trying to say. Like, what’s wrong with just being a White Australian? I don’t get it. I realise that the current system wants to kill you and replace you with a more manageable slave population from overseas if you’re a White Australian, I get it.

 

And so from the perspective of the administrative class, the institutional class, there’s a lot wrong with being a White Australian. If you’re a White Australian, you’re held responsible for everything bad that ever happened in this land, ever! Especially to Aboriginal people.

 

[53:21]

 

But even if you want to extend outside of Australia, you’re responsible for all suffering of the native Maori people! Evil White colonial barbarians are responsible for the suffering of South Africans! And the only way we manage to advance our civilisation as White people was by exploiting and dominating other cultures around the world like the cruel colonials we were. And for all the suffering we’ve caused around the world, we now have to pay! We have to pay by dying quietly and getting replaced!

 

That’s the attitude of the institutional class. And it’s kind of creepy, isn’t it, to live in an environment, in a civilisation where your own government essentially wants to kill you and they think it’s justified for racial reasons. There’s like this relentless race hate that’s motivating your own governing forces and they don’t even see it. Like, they don’t even realise if you’re someone who works for media, government, Ranking police officer, if you’re actually thinking this much, you won’t even realise that you’ve been spelled by race hate propaganda, which is anti-White in essence. Like, you’ll just look at White people and you’ll even look at yourself if you’re a White person with these kind of preconceptions, and you’ll just despise that ethnicity because of what you’re being led to believe has happened as a result of that ethnicity and colonialism.

 

So it’s interesting, isn’t it? They say that evil is a point of view and every way of man is right in his own mind. And that is so true. It is so true because the people in government who are actually in the process of punishing White people for being White evil colonials, they think that they’re doing a good thing. They think it’s justified because they do believe White people have caused all that suffering. So they think it’s all justifiable and it’s all just consequence of the evil things our ancestors did.

 

Every way of man is right in his own mind. It’s eerily similar to the story of Attack on Titan. If anyone hasn’t watched Attack on Titan, you should try to watch it. I understand the first season or two might be hard to get through and you might feel like you’re just watching some stupid cartoon about these weird looking giants, but god, as it gets into the final season, man, wow! I’m of the opinion that that show has the power to deprogram Leftists. It’s that powerful! It’s a story that teaches you about race hate propaganda and how it works and how it’s used as, or to establish an effective power dynamic to unite people against that single ethnic enemy. I don’t think I’ve ever watched a story as impactful as Attack on Titan. I can’t even believe some Japanese guy came up with a story that impactful. It’s fucking crazy!

 

Or maybe it’s just that I’m used to Western media just being so bland, just so full of pathetic propaganda. You know, I watched this movie, or I tried to watch this movie a couple of weeks ago called Frankenstein. Supposed to be a movie about Frankenstein. That was one of the worst movies I’ve ever tried to watch. It went for a long time and it’s like for perhaps for maybe two hours or at least an hour and a half, I just sat there waiting for it to get good. I’m thinking:

 

“Surely with this cast, surely with the material they have to work with the amount of money they’ve spent on this film, surely it’s about to get good. At any stage now it’s going to get good!”

 

But every decision made by the main characters doesn’t make a lot of sense. And every scene is just a crybaby story about poor Frankenstein! Everyone so mean to Frankenstein and he’s just so good and kind, the poor thing! And after you’ve just been hit with that scene after scene after scene after scene for almost two hours, you’re like:

 

“Where the fuck is this story going? I can’t even watch this anymore!”

 

I just turned it off. It is just so bland, uninteresting and weird! It’s weird!

 

And so you watch Japanese animation and you get really impactful, compelling stories about ethnic tensions and race hate propaganda and political power dynamics. And even involved in that is like time manipulation and shit on top of all that stuff put into this incredible, incredible story! And it really speaks volumes of the quality of Western entertainment when it’s being completely smashed in terms of quality, thoughtfulness, creativity by random Japanese cartoonists!

 

It’s getting really hot in this part of the house that I’m in the sun is beating down on this window in front of me. I’ve got the blind down, but maybe I’m just getting frustrated. I can never tell if it’s actually hot or if I’m just getting angry. I’m one of those people that when I get frustrated, my head turns bright red and I just start getting really hot. Mepola says:

 

“Yeah, Frankenstein was absolutely awful! I saw it with the missus. We both looked at each other throughout the film, cringing. It was insufferable!”

 

It was absolutely insufferable. It was. What else did I watch recently? I watched a show that was just absolutely miserable! And it had that Australian actor in it. What’s his name again? He’s in that movie Warrior with Tom Hardy. He’s Tom Hardy’s brother in the movie Warrior. What’s that guy’s name again?

 

[59:21]

 

Anyway, it’s a movie about this guy who loses his family. He loses his family and he kind of waits for his family to come back, but they never do because they died in a fire. And that’s basically the whole movie. It’s just really depressing. But there’s several elements of the film that I thought were interesting. You know what? I don’t remember it well enough to go through it. All I know is that was laced with low key propaganda. That was just “White man bad.” You know Joel Edgerton. That’s the guy. Thank you, Joel Edgerton. You guys might know the movie I’m talking about. I think it’s on Netflix or one of the major streaming services right now! It’s just the most miserable, pointless film laced with evil propaganda. I won’t even say evil necessarily. It’s just hostile propaganda. It’s hostile!

 

Like there’s one scene that doesn’t make a lot of sense. There’s just some guy because they’re all part of some tree logging company. And there’s a guy who’s just ranting about Jesus and stuff like that. He’s just some random White guy, kind of overweight. Then this black cowboy comes into the scene, asks if anyone’s seen this guy. And the overweight White guy, we’re talking about just starts running and the black cowboy shoots him and says:

 

“He killed my brother for no reason but the colour of his skin. Anyone got a problem with what I’ve just done, speak up and we’ll have it out now.”

 

And no one says anything. And the black cowboy just rides off. And that scene is just inconsequential to the rest of the movie. It was just completely fucking unnecessary! And you realise it’s only in the movie just to put that:

 

“Ha. White guy gets shot by a black guy for noble reason!”

 

I don’t even know, man! I won’t. Like I said, I don’t remember all the scene structure, the structures of each scene well enough to actually analyze it. I’ve noticed people get really famous from analyzing films. Like The Critical Drinker on YouTube. I always liked that guy.

 

I started watching him before he had the huge following too, that Scottish character. And it’s one of those things that I think I could have done quite well, analyzing films. I was just basically always so busy trying to afford rent, losing every job that I got after three months because someone would Google my name and some woman at the HR department of whatever company I was working for would take issue with me. I was too busy doing that to actually invest any time into analyzing film.

 

But it’s really easy to take a Western film and analyze it and just unpack the propaganda. In my opinion, it’s really easy. But there’s some good influences. There’s some good people on YouTube doing that right now! And yeah, I don’t like the heat. I’m not looking forward to summer this year. It’s officially summer in Australia, but it’s been raining a lot.

 

Anyway, again, thanks for joining me everyone. I expect that this stream will be available to watch after I’ve finished it. So if you have missed the start of it, I think it should still be there. I believe that I set it up in that way, but I’m not entirely sure. I’m here to streaming through OBS because I couldn’t work out Streamyard. And there’s this new one called Restream, I think. You connect it to your Rumble account and it says that it’s connected. But then there’s no stream key and there’s no source and there’s nowhere to put that stuff. And so I’m thinking how the fuck does this work? This is not intuitive at all! They pretend it’s like the easiest thing ever to set up, but it’s really not.

 

What’s a good movie? What’s a good movie? Give me a movie, guys, that’s worth watching, in your opinion. The last good show that I watched was called God, it’s getting so hot in here. I’m sweating. I can’t last much longer, lads. The last good show I watched was Ripley. Anyone seen Ripley? It was a black and white film, I believe, set in the 60s. I think it was on Netflix. I believe that Tom Ripley is almost like a folklore character in certain cultures, but it’s about identity theft. And it makes you realise when you watch the film how easy identity theft was or would have been in the 60s. It’s not so easy now due to all developing technologies, but in the 60s, all you needed was, yeah, you could just glue your passport photo on top of someone else’s passport photo and then that’s who you were.

 

Recommend anime solo leveling. I don’t know if I have it in me to sit there and watch another anime. It’s like after I did Attack on Titan. I’ve done Attack on Titan twice as well. Because I liked it that much. I watched it again gradually. Took me months. But, yeah, I don’t know if I have any more anime in me for another six months, but I’ll try.

 

When you get to a certain age, this is a sad reality, but it is a reality nonetheless. When you get to a certain age, it’s more difficult to intake new information. It’s not impossible, but it’s more difficult. So when you’re exposed to new things, it’s kind of like you get tired really quickly. Makes you miss being a kid where everything was just, your brain is just able to absorb everything so quickly and efficiently when you’re young.

 

[1:05:18]

 

I’ve heard about Nuremberg with Russell Crowe, but I haven’t watched it yet. I saw Russell Crowe on the Joe Rogan podcast. I actually clipped it. I clipped the part where Russell Crowe was talking about how, and this links back into what we were talking about earlier in the stream. Russell Crowe is talking about nuance regarding certain Nazi officials, specifically Hermann Goring, the chief of the Luftwaffe, the German Air Force. Nuance regarding him as a person looking into his life and the circumstances of Germany before and after the war. And I clipped that and tried posting it to TikTok, and it got instantly deleted! I thought maybe it was the song that I put on with it. So I deleted the song and tried to upload it without the music. Instantly deleted again.

 

And that takes me back to what I was talking about before, how nuance cannot be permitted by the existing administrative forces. The hand behind the government, you might say. It is their job right now to eliminate nuance, to ban nuance, or to limit your access to nuance, specifically on the subject of the Second World War and any revisionism or extra information that people are making available on the Second World War, on Hitler and the Nazis. Because nuance, once made available, is eventually and with mathematical certainty going to result in people having more sympathy for Hitler and the Nazis. That’s where nuance leads.

 

Have a cold beer. How the hell is beer gonna cool me down when I’m hot? You realise alcohol raises your body temperature. Beer! I shouldn’t judge people for drinking, though. Joel drinks. Joel enjoys a beer. He seems to handle it pretty well, too. Joel’s not one of those people who loses his shit when he gets drunk. He kind of becomes more entertaining. He loosens up a little bit, and it doesn’t seem to impact his intelligence at all! If anything, it just slightly sharpens it.

 

They’re incapable of allowing nuance. It’s not that they’re incapable, it’s that they’re absolutely unwilling because they understand the destructive power of nuance. That’s what I’m trying to get at. Anyone who is permitting nuance or encouraging nuance, that is more open discussion or objective discussion regarding Second World War and Hitler specifically, will be considered a dangerous enemy of the administrative forces of government right now!

 

It’s really important to understand that, too. They’re not just disregarding National Socialism as incontrovertibly evil out of ignorance. It’s not out of ignorance. It’s very deliberate. Because any open discussion on the topic is eventually going to lead to a broader and better understanding of the topic. And that is not in the interests of current government media alliance to have you actually understanding the Second World War in any broad capacity. You’re supposed to just write Hitler and the Nazis off as evil, and that’s it. You’re not supposed to look into it beyond that.

 

Basically, this whole society is built on not allowing nuance on this particular topic. [chuckling] Again, they’re going to lock down social media. I think I mentioned that, but I didn’t really unpack it fully. It begins with this whole:

 

“Oh, we’re protecting people under 16 by not allowing them on social media!”

 

That’s just them getting their foot in the door when they can work out how to accomplish that and force the social media companies to abide by that rule, they’ll take the next step. Not really sure what the next step will be, but the goal will be to lock down social media specifically. And the final goal will be to censor the Internet in entirety.

 

I actually saw a video recently of a guy who managed to get his hands on two smartphones from North Korea. And both of these phones were totally locked down. They already come with heaps of apps, but they’re several years behind the technology of the phones we have available to us. There is access to the Internet, but it’s like an internal Internet controlled by the government. And you have to put your details in. You have to punch in all your details before you can use it. So they know exactly who you are and what you’re looking at, even though what’s available is still censored and controlled by them. Just in case you find a way to use that Internet service to get beyond what they can control, then they know who you are and where to find you and I found it curious because when I was watching the video, the guy presenting this information to people, he was like:

 

“I wonder if we’ll ever see the fall of North Korea in our lifetime. I think we will?”

 

And I laughed because I thought to myself:

 

“Not only are you not going to see the fall of North Korea and the circumstances in North Korea, you’re going to see those same circumstances implemented in the West. It’s actually the opposite. You’re not going to see the fall of stuff like this. You’re going to see it becoming a widespread thing!”

 

But at least North Koreans have national pride laced into their particular brand of communism, which is kind of like. What do they call it? It’s like National Bolshevism. Nazbol. I suppose that’s how you would summarize the North Korean system. The kind of totalitarian system we’re going to end up with is an Internet that’s totally censored and controlled. But you’re also not allowed to express any national or ethnic pride because that exhibits opposition to the dominant ideology within Western society, which is multiculturalism, everyone’s equal, right? So national ethnic pride is a problem for the current ruling ideology. So that won’t be allowed.

 

It’s almost like North Korea will be a preferable alternative. The system of North Korea will be a preferable alternative to what’s around the corner for the West. But I don’t know, maybe even though we’re going to go through a time where everyone’s going to jail for no reason other than ideology. You’ve got America. I just saw in the news recently that America is like, probing Australia to try to gather as much information on how corrupt Australia actually is and how much damage like multicultural dogma and mass immigration has done to Australia, where that damage has been done specifically and who’s responsible for it, at an institutional level. America is apparently collecting data on that subject. I’d say they’re pretty late to the party. It’s been going on for a long fucking time!

 

[1:12:08]

 

And my guess is the reason they’re collecting data is to work out how bad the situation really is and whether it’s reversible. Well, certain elements of America, anyway. It could just be all like certain elements of American government pretending that they’re going to do something to help Western society, but really they’re powerless to do anything at all because they’re too under the thumb.

 

Yeah, people like Avi Yemeni won’t go to jail. Yeah, I’m talking about, like actual Australian nationalists, not T-shirt salesmen. Not your (((dual citizens))) who really just are champions of Israel and some sort of subversive foreign policy. Would I even consider Avi to be a champion of subversive foreign policy? I don’t know. All I know is that this guy, you can’t compare this guy to an actual someone like me, for example, we’re totally different.

 

I actually watched Avi Yemeni kick Hugo Lennon. Is it Hugo Lennon? Auspill. Try to remove him from a rally. He claims that it wasn’t him removing Hugo. It was Nick Patterson removing him.

 

But it’s clearly Avi standing there arguing with him, coming up with reasons why he should leave:

 

“You’re a Nazi. You’re wearing a Helly Hansen jacket. That’s Nazism. How dare you!”

 

I thought it was amusing how Hugo accused Harvey of schizophrenia because I think there’s a high rate of schizophrenia in the jewish population. I think that’s statistically fact. It’s got something to do with their breeding patterns, or a genetic variation that produces higher levels of schizophrenia on a per capita basis.

 

But I don’t know, I’ve got to watch that again. I haven’t actually. I don’t have in my mind an effective memory of that video. I’ve only watched it once, so I did notice that not many people were on his side, though. Not many people appreciated Avi just yelling “Nazi” at Auspill because of a jacket brand he was wearing and having him removed from a rally when he was just standing there on his own, not bothering anyone, trying to listen to the speakers. Yeah, everyone in the comments was against him. That’s understandable why.

 

As I said, any real Australian nationalist is going to be focused on a single issue right now, which is stopping immigration. If they’re focused on anything else, especially “Nazi hunting”, you should just treat them as an enemy to the cause, because all they’re doing is diluting and detracting from that single issue, which is going to unite everyone! People can only be united by a single issue. The moment they detract from that issue or they’re detracted from that issue by someone trying to drag their attention away elsewhere, then the whole cause begins to crash. It’s very simple.

 

Well, thanks for joining me, guys. First solo stream I’ve done in several years. MaybeNextTime I will play that game. But funnily enough, to my surprise, I didn’t have any trouble talking this long. Usually I would have gotten bored 40 minutes ago.

 

So we got Superchats, don’t we? Is that how it works? We read out Superchats. I think I’ve got them all here, but I’m not entirely sure. Philip Mellor gave $5 and says:

 

“Hail Boomer Tech. I’ve missed my fix of the Joel and Blair Show.”

 

Am I Boomer Tech? I am pretty old now. Neil tells me that all the time. Neil Erikson, if you guys know who that is, an old friend of mine. He keeps reminding me that:

 

“Bro, we’re old now. You realise that there’s a whole new generation of activists. We’re the old guys now!”

 

I’m thinking:

 

“Yeah, I suppose he’s right about that. Fuck, when did that happen?”

 

Pedro Escobar gives $20.

 

Thank you very much. He says:

 

“Shekels for you. Hail Australia. You are the vanguard for us all.”

 

I’m just a guy, man! I’m just a guy in a room right now! But thanks. I do what I can. The Queen’s Guard gave $5 and says:

 

“Do you ever think you’ll inevitably have to take up a more free frontline position in nationalism again? Like starting up UPF again or becoming a politician or something?”

 

First we have to get through this period of going to jail for what we believe and surviving the political policing. We need to adapt to that and work out how bad that’s actually going to be. So first we need to get our doors kicked in early in the morning, get arrested, go to jail for ideological reasons. Work out how we’re going to get out of jail and then develop a strategy for stopping them doing that to us in the future.

 

So that’s what’s in the immediate future for us activists of the nationalist cause. We’ll talk about taking more frontline positions up again after we’ve been through that and adapted to it. Queens Guard again says, Gives $2 and says:

 

“Tell us about UPF days, Blair. Staunching pedos, [word unclear], bashing Antifa, etc.”

 

What do I say specifically? It was all very, it was all very impulsive. The United Patriots Front, I’ll be honest, on my behalf at least, it was all very impulsive. I didn’t really have much of a long term plan. I just had a Facebook page. We had that idea, that single issue, as I mentioned several times in the stream beforehand. And we just ran with it. We ran with it and we tried to affect public discourse as much as possible. And we knew eventually we had to build a political party.

 

But interestingly, as soon as we segued into building a political party, that’s when all the trouble started. That’s when I got charged, me and two of my colleagues, actually, we all got charged with what was essentially a speech crime for a Facebook post, “intent to incite ridicule” on Facebook. My bank accounts got frozen and deleted. I got blacklisted from Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, all within three months. And I couldn’t even communicate with my supporters to tell them what was going on in court. And suddenly due to all that random intervention, the political party was basically bust. And we didn’t really know what to do, because we didn’t have like a physical place where we all went. We didn’t have a physical membership necessarily. All it was a Facebook page. We just had social media and that was it.

 

And that was the mistake we made, I suppose, because at the end of the day someone just pushed a button:

 

“Delete them off Facebook, delete their bank accounts, charge them with hate speech. Done!”

 

[1:19:23]

 

 

It was that easy for them to get rid of us back in the day. I gotta be honest though, actually, I’ll tell that story another time. That’s a little bit too much for how much brain power I have remaining. The Queens Guard again sends $2:

 

“You should start vlogging, Blair. I was just thinking of whether Nick Patterson would have the same balls to confront and try to kick you out if you decided to attend one of his Zio-Christ coming events.”

 

Personally, I’ve never had an issue With Nick Patterson. And I went to his gym once. It was probably three or four years ago. I went to his gym and we did some training. Kickboxing training. He used to do kickboxing, I think it was kickboxing or maybe some form of MMA. And, yeah, he used to rant about Christian stuff back then, too. So he’s always been into the same stuff. But I don’t know. I’m not really in a position where I’m attending protests in the capacity of participating. If I was going to attend something, it would just be to listen. But Hugo Lennon just did that. He attended one of these rallies these guys had, just to listen to the speakers. And he was ejected because Avi decided he was a Nazi as a consequence of his jacket brand [Helly Hanson], which is the same brand I’m wearing, by the way. It’s becoming quite popular. It’s good stuff, actually.

 

It reminds me of Kathmandu before Kathmandu got shit! Kathmandu used to be good, quality merchandise, but then it’s like they sold out to some cheap shit! There’s different qualities of Chinese merch, right? There’s some good factories in China, and but they’re only like 10% of the factories, then 90% of the factories just dirt shit!

 

And it’s like Kathmandu started in the top 10% and then they ended up in the 90% ones. And now. Now it just sucks! Their merch doesn’t really feel good anymore. But this stuff feels like the way Kathmandu merch used to feel. It’s good shit!

 

The Bearded Indian sends through $8. Thank you. He says:

 

“Nazi smears. I respond, the National Socialist German Workers party dissolved in 1945. So does that make you a commie? And people usually shut the fuck up!”

 

Right. Are you saying you call people a communist when they call you a Nazi? I don’t think that’s powerful enough, personally. You’re better off calling people, anyone who says you’re a Nazi you can presuppose that they support mass immigration into the West. And so you should just call them a rapist! Because the immigrants that are coming into this country are, per capita, they’re committing more rapes than, like, standard Australians would, by and large.

 

So if you’re an advocate for mass immigration, you’re an advocate for rape. So you need to use language which is a little bit more potent than communist. You see, Nazi and racists. Racist doesn’t carry the same weight as it used to, which is why the media stopped using it. Because it’s been overused. But Nazi, or neo-Nazi and White supremacists. These are curse words which have a particular bite to them. And you can only match that level of bite with something like rapists or murderer! Rapists might be a better one. But you don’t need to concern yourself so much with whether or not the word can be applied logically or truthfully, because your enemy is not concerned with that, you just need to be concerned with the impact the accusation has and the effect it has on your opponent in an argument. So they call you a Nazi. You say:

 

“Well, you’re a rapist. You’re a rapist dog!”

 

You know what I mean? You can practice stuff like that you need to use language which is just as strong or has an even stronger impact on them than the Nazi phrase or smear has on you. Broden Nielsen sends $10. Thank you and says:

 

“Hail from Sweden!”

 

Well, hello back to you from Australia, Sweden. The only person I know from Sweden is Marcus Follin, also known as the Golden One. I can’t say that we talk all the time, but we occasionally nod to each other from across the pond, that is almost the rest of the world. We’re very far away. But he’s always been someone I’ve appreciated and sort of looked up to, Marcus. So whenever I think of Sweden, I usually think of Marcus because he’s the only person I’ve spoken to from Sweden.

 

I’m not sure what “gifted subscription” means, but thank you. Thank you to Broden Nielsen for that. And look, guys, I’m like, roasting in here! I’m cooking, so I’m gonna go pretty soon. I hope the stream has been comparably as entertaining as it would have been with Joel. I know that I can’t provide the same level of intellectual discourse that Joel can. It’s funny, actually, when you sit on stream with Joel, you feel kind of dumb when you listen to Joel’s platitudes and how excellent he is at actually phrasing or piecing together an explanation or argument, especially when you already agree with him, by and large, you kind of just feel like nothing you can say is going to match the level of intelligence that Joel’s put out there or expressed.

 

[1:25:18]

 

So usually what I do is actually try to play devil’s advocate with him and act like I’m opposing him on a few things because that actually tends to open his mind up even more.

 

Well, thanks, guys. I suppose that’s it. Cheers for joining me. Was there anything I didn’t touch on that I wanted to? Well, I hope no one is like, disheartened or believes what I’ve said here is like a black pill or something like that it’s not that way at all! When I say that everyone who is influential in nationalism is going to jail, it’s not that much of a big deal. Like, we have good prisons in Australia and it’s relatively easy to spend time in prison. It tends to be a bit of a holiday in my experience. However, I’ve never been to jail in solitary confinement as a result of my ideology.

 

But when you look at everything, the way it’s happening, what the Federal police are saying, the way they’re targeting influential people who are advocates for our kind of ideology, the ideology that I’ve always advocated for, then you just need to be objective about it. You need to be honest with yourself and you need to be like, okay, we’re going into a new threshold of political policing where just being me is going to be illegal! You know, just being a nationalist of the ethnic kind is basically going to be illegal.

 

And I don’t think anyone should be too concerned about that, though. It’s just part of how politics goes throughout history. Things get pretty bad and then they sort of settle down and then they get pretty bad again. And you shouldn’t take things too seriously like that because, I don’t know, life goes on for most of us, [chuckling] but it doesn’t concern me that much. Like I said, it’s all just part of the game. I just do what I can to make sure that it’s not too easy for them to throw me in jail for ideological reasons. As you guys know, I’m pretty careful with the way I word things and I keep my nose clean, so that’s about as much as I can do.

 

I hope the quality of this has been okay. I hope the quality’s been okay. I use one of these little Bluetooth mics because, how strange is this? I have this huge Rode microphone which is like, it plugs into your computer, like, USB attachment so it uses your computer’s power supply.

 

But then you’ve got this little thing here, this little Bluetooth mic, which is it operates through a receiver and stuff. But that little thing is like, significantly better quality and more powerful than this. How does that work? That’s like alien technology, lads. I don’t understand it. I remember how much I was astounded by our technology had developed after I got out of jail when I was younger. I went to prison in 2011, I believe. I think it was 2011. I believe it was December 2011, and I got out for the first time. I got out November 2012, right before my birthday, I think. And before I went to prison, I was working for a building company and we just had work phones with buttons on them. Just your standard, like, button phone. The company gave everyone these phones. It was just part of working for the company. It was the deal. And then I’m remanded in custody for a while and I’m out on bail, but then I’m back in jail, whatever.

 

And then a couple of years later, I’m out of prison, I’m on parole, and everyone has these smartphones. A friend of mine gives me an old apple iPhone 4, and for the first time I’m exposed to Instagram and Facebook on a phone. And I’m like:

 

“Fucking, wow! Where the fuck did this technology come from? How does this even work?”

 

You know how people speculate that during the Second World War, Hitler must have been in touch with aliens or something, because how did he manage to develop all of this crazy technology that no one else has heard of? How did they build jet planes for the first time? And I don’t even know. There’s like a long list of technological developments that the Germans were responsible for during the Second World War.

 

And it’s like I feel the same about the development of all this micro technology, the smartphones, and how much data that they can actually fit on a solid state drive these days, which is like as big as your finger. Considering how fast it developed, it’s fucking incredible! It doesn’t make a lot of sense how we went from like Nokia brick phones when I was like 13 or 14 to literally like five years later, everyone’s got an iPhone. Like, how did it develop that quickly? I think the way, you know, someone in tech would explain it is everything just got like, shrunk down and multiplied, and they just kept shrinking things down and things kept multiplying, shrunk and multiplied over and over again!

 

All right, well, I’m glad the quality of the stream was good. I didn’t expect it would be going through just OBS. But 65 Stoney sends $20. Thanks, mate. And he said:

 

“Drop Turtle Wow Server and Faction Blair currently on classic anniversary.”

 

Hang on, I’ll have to look it up. Have to look it up. I’ll have to log into it. Hang on. What server am I in? Definitely I play Alliance because I’m not a degenerate mutant. Yeah, I’m Alliance Master Race.

 

[1:31:20]

 

I’ll probably show you guys actually. Let’s jump on. If I go display capture and I put this down here like that this is my hardcore character. I’ve got a few characters. I’ve been playing this server for about. I’ve been playing the server when it first came out, I think. Oh, shit! Hang on. Let me make sure I kill this guy. Just going to move my streaming thing over here to this screen so I can see what I’m doing. I’m getting lag. I don’t know. My bags are full.

 

So, yeah, this is my Paladin. He’s level 37. I made this character probably about two or three years ago. That’s how much chance I get to actually play this game. But I’ve had to be really careful. Had to be very careful with this character because if this character dies, he’s gone! It’s just over for me. As you can see. If you play actual Vanilla World of Warcraft, you might notice that the talents are slightly different and my abilities are slightly different too. In this one, you get a combination of strikes which actually make playing Retribution Paladin a little bit more interesting. You get Holy Strike and Crusader Strike, which share a cooldown. So you choose between them and they provide unique buffs. So you ideally want to use both of them when you’re fighting something. I’ll give you an example here.

 

So this is the best Seal you get, which is Seal of Command. It basically gives you a chance to do double damage on an attack. And because I just used. Because I just use Crusader Strike, it increases my attack and casting speed by 3%, which stacks three times. And then Holy Strike gives you strength increase, which is also stackable. I’m gonna die, man! What am I doing? Imagine if I died. This character, that’s years old, you forget how much. Oh, don’t heal! Fuck you! Don’t worry. I still have ways out here. I’ve still got bubble. Oh, I’m out of here. You can’t take any chances, guys, on these hardcore characters. Let’s get the fuck out of here before she comes back with her mates.

 

I really should do some work. I’ve got to start making money. Yeah, see, she’s coming back with her mates. I told you. And look at my health. This is what they do. These fucking mongrel half breeds! Look at them! Half horse, half human. What an abomination! I shouldn’t be here anyway. I don’t know what I’m doing around Moradin. Let’s head back.

 

I’m about to close the stream. I think of I don’t think I want to become one of those video game streamers. Someone said once, actually, that the day Blair starts streaming a game is the day Australia, …

 

[stream ends]

 

 

[1:34:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/12/2026 = 57)

goyslopdesigns
2 days ago
blair is chronically correct and early on censorship and overreach. been a month tho buddy give us a stream

katana17
2 days ago
[Blair Cottrell – The Joel Davis Situation – Jan 9, 2026 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2026/01/09/blair-cottrell-the-joel-davis-situation-jan-9-2026-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell gives us an update on Joel Davis, a political prisoner being held in Sydney’s Long Bay Correctional Complex, in a punishment cell without basic amenities, all for making a social media post critical of the politician Allegra Spender who had called for him and other NSN members to be jailed for a peaceful legal protest urging that the all-powerful jewish lobby in Australia be abolished. That lobby has had Davis denied bail and held in detention since he was arrested on Nov 20, 2025, at Bondi. – KATANA]
1
0

Delete
TheHender
1 week ago
I notice that you ask Joel obvious questions or devil’s advocate questions (the ones people think are ‘black pill’) so that Joel can lead off from there and expound on that topic. There is a reason for this and it seems a lot of people just don’t get that. It is that or you’re just a dumb dumb, Blair hahaha
1
0

TheHender
1 week ago
I enjoy playing games while listening to podcasts. Currently on a spreadsheet-like game, Football Manager 2024. Or I will be on Turtle WoW while listening to the backlog of you and Joel. Add me if you want: Waughloch

TheHender
1 week ago
The moment I heard about the Social Media Ban for young people, I knew immediately they were aware that the “H*tler Youth” is rising and the government knows it. They’re trying to get ahead of the game.

kitsubot
VerifiedSupporter
1 week ago
The far right whites worldwide should converge on the only white nation left with free speech and gun rights – namely the United States. We are the only nation with a chance, our right wingers are out breeding liberals, we out voted them several times recently, and the Australian stock are descended from people who left England and Ireland to build again. It is your heritage to leave when the government oversteps their bounds. As a heritage American myself i welcome the real Aussies to come build with us here where we still have a shot. We can always come back and conquer Australia with u again in the future but for now you are welcome here.

goyslopdesigns
2 weeks ago
one stream a month? I thought this dude was an influencer

leibekohne
3 weeks ago
Blair I would blame Australian melting Pot non-white situation women not because they are weaker vessel but because they are evil by not having children. Those young unvaccinated white bitches who hate men =misandry should fuck them and have every year child,saying “I do not know who the father is, there were few of them it was one day stand, I was drunk”. gov. will pay them and give housing at least that way they will blocked street shitters and other non-whites scum savage aboerectus out of free housing market. I know is bad advice but better then die young of alcohol drugs and be replace. Perhaps bastardized children will fight for us those treasonous filth politician and feminists.

leibekohne
3 weeks ago
Is jew? word allowed, Hitler is banned??in Australia??

SolarStormMan
3 weeks ago
Been waiting for you to do a solo stream while Joel is locked up. Hopefully the Joel and Blair show can return in early January
1
0

whitehonkymonkey
3 weeks ago
the thought police have arrived so its up to us to be smarter and find some other way to get around there BS laws.

goyslopdesigns
3 weeks ago
bro is an influencer but can’t stream once a week and only pulls up for an hour on other streams

Gabe0007
4 weeks ago
I’m at 31 minutes mark. Blair! YOU’RE WRONG..!!!!!!!! WRONG!!! >>>> There’s another way, big man! THE ONLY WAY FORWARD OR YOU, AS WHITE AUSTRALIANS WILL BE NO MORE!!!!!!! CLICK ON THIS PICTURE!!! : https://i.imgur.com/50D5YeO.jpeg You WHITE Aussie boys either UNDERSTAND this or you, as White Australians will be no more. ( I cannot type it more simple as this. ) And I don’t want it, you don’t want it, none of us WHITE MEN want it..!! But there will be no other peaceful option.

Gabe0007
4 weeks ago
Meanwhile here in the f.cked up UK…. : Woman’s little daughter was denied by LEFTIE ( all schools are fkn’ leftist here! ) SCHOOL, – because of her mother’s hurty words! LINK : https://freespeechunion.org/lucy-connollys-daughter-banned-from-new-school/?v=7885444af42e

TACTICALBOY88
4 weeks ago
Merry Christmas Heil Brother o/ 110

MigC
4 weeks ago
I could listen to this man talk all day. God bless you, Blair.

Sinagoglies
4 weeks ago
Oh, that’s why downplays Israhell and MoSSAD, glorifies war and unjust invasions; and doesn’t like conspiracies!? Occultist Joel & co always plays down soviet fake Israel and glorifies war Kosher Collett and Joel Davis (Antifa Man) https://www.bitchute.com/video/XsI7RgOHpdVG Joel Davis Baphomet Tattoo https://www.bitchute.com/video/ijm47i4rYBkd Thomas Sewell admits to Snitching (and Black and Tans in his family (British Bolsheviks) attacking and invading Ireland. https://www.bitchute.com/video/hoOljtlDj2vb Occult Forces (1943) National Socialist Anti-Freemasonry Film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW4NzVxhnUg The hard-line anti-occultist faction within the NS movement was concentrated in the SD, the Sicherheitsdienst or “security service” of the SS under Reinhard Heydrich (Roman Catholic). They were largely kept in check from 1933 to 1941 by other NS officials including the staff of Rudolf Hess Thomas Sewell wants esoteric Hitlerism! I see now– Joel loves his trance techno non music! Psytrance music bridges the divide between secular and religious Jews in Israel https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/dancing-on-common-ground https://harvardindependent.com/kleztronica-how-techno-raves-modernize-traditional-jewish-music/ Jewish Techno Party https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep_35FTnYVA&list=RDEp_35FTnYVA&start_radio=1 https://supertravelr.com/en/trip/israel/heres-ultra-orthodox-jewish-sect-israel-rave-trance-music-7E4A9E9D97/ In 1933, the Vatican signed a Concordat with the Hitler & the Nazi Party. This made the Vatican the first state of officially recognise Nazi Germany. Find out more on our online resource https://www.concordatwatch.eu/showkb.php?org_id=858&kb_header_id=752&kb_id=1211 HITLER SPEAKS OF CHRISTIANITY AND HIS AND GERMANY’S CHRISTIAN FAITH https://www.bitchute.com/video/vBiW14nRKDNI/ https://www.wikiart.org/en/adolf-hitler/mother-mary-with-the-holy-child-jesus-christ

IcarusWax
4 weeks ago
We will win.

jonkvh
4 weeks ago
Great stream Blair.

Bigboy6669
4 weeks ago
hail

DonaldDucktator
Supporter
4 weeks ago
Wow, you really nailed the ending of this solo stream Give yourself some credit this was very enjoyable.

TVR_
4 weeks ago
Great stream Blair

amundsentb
4 weeks ago
Great stream!

wyrdweasel
4 weeks ago
Haven’t seen the recent ‘Frankenstein’ but the director Guillermo del Toro is a leftist so not surprised it’s a fail with no balls. Try the 2014 film ‘Unbroken’ for the true survival story of a WWII airman who went through hell (surprisingly well directed by Angelina Jolie but don’t let it put you off).

loosifur
4 weeks ago
https://www.linkedin.com/in/lucy-manly-8a2aa851/

shorterboy
5 weeks ago
Use TOX or SimpleX to create online spaces

› Show 1 reply
shorterboy
5 weeks ago
Frankenstein was written by a woman, your supposed to feel sympathy for the alien because female sex preferences

shorterboy
5 weeks ago
buy yacht a starlink mini and make them work to catch you while sail the coast

TinyHatRemover
Supporter
5 weeks ago
“You’ve had too much to think” -Australia police
9
0

SomerledsBlood
5 weeks ago
here’s a movie recommendation for you Blair: The Proposition (2005)
3
0

› Show 1 reply
Goraxium
5 weeks ago
The funniest part of Joel’s arrest is that ASIO has warned the government about men who do not believe that there is a political solution to the bullshit the government is forcing on people, and the government is proving it. “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable”. ASIO needs to start arresting politicians for their deliberate attacks on social cohesion, because if there is no political solution…
3
0

Girnigoe
5 weeks ago
Good to find you streaming! Greetings from America. Joel will be avenged and return to erode the social fabric again! Here’s to the White Australia Party. The ZOG knows how popular it will be, and what a problem it will be for them, probably even more so than what happened in Germany recently. Hail!
8
0

Tachibana88
5 weeks ago
I watched The King on Netflix recently, and it was actually really good. it’s from 2019, about the rise of Henry V.
2
0

charliebrownau
5 weeks ago
Gday Blairs Solo Sunday Stream was really good I hope he continues it each Sunday No Victory without Struggle _________ Regards Charlie b * Email – charliebrownau@protonmail.com * Videos – https://poast.tv/c/charliebrownau/videos * Telegram – t.me/s/Charliebrownau
2
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
5 weeks ago
Blair watch Mr Inbetween, its a great Australian series
4
0

› Show 1 reply
WhiteBitchTripleSix
Supporter+
5 weeks ago
I prefer to fidget while learning as well. Especially when I had to sit in a class for 8 hours a day..
3
0

CovenantSolidier
Supporter
5 weeks ago
Hail from Montana brother
9
0

FellowComrade
Supporter+
5 weeks ago
I love how Blair is so measured in his perspective. He has seen shit and created things. Been through a lot, but still comes across as a good guy who has his mind in the right place. Gotta appreciate anyone who can handle the world coming down on them and retain the twinkle in their eye.
11
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
5 weeks ago
I genuinely sense a sadness in you Blair like you really miss your friends when they’re locked up, as a man you wanna be surrounded by your mates building something positive
5
0

TraskJackson
5 weeks ago
Heck-yeah. Glad to be here.
9
0

Cardiff4
Verified
5 weeks ago
Great Talk Blair. I empathize with your frustration of technology, it gets to me sometimes as well. Your mic/sound and video quality were really good. For a minute I thought you were in a jail cell…. solid white walls. haha. Glad your not. Cheers Mate. Looking forward to hearing from you again. FREE JOEL….. Helly Hansen
13
0

GreenGladeAryan
5 weeks ago
The Iron Claw 2023
1
0

Ethereal1562
5 weeks ago
Good to see you Blair. You mentioned the rapid development of technology after you got out of prison, and WW2 etc. You might find Diana Pasulka’s research on ‘human satellites’ and NASA’s secret programs, where they receive ‘downloads’ of information, interesting. Sounds schizo, but she is a legit professor and researcher.
2
0

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter++
5 weeks ago
Fuck i didn’t know you were streaming!! If you do this regularly I’ll definitely be here and donating my guy. I’ll pay attention to telegram for noti’s from now on. o/
15
0

AngloSaxon88
5 weeks ago
Even here in Scandinavia Blair and Joel are missed. It’s great to hear from you Blair!
30
0

Greatsouthern
5 weeks ago
Is anyone else being asked to “verify” their rumble account?
2
0

› Show 2 replies
Greatsouthern
5 weeks ago
Great to hear from you Blair.
33
0

› Show 2 replies
LachlanMD
5 weeks ago
Heil
14
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Graham Connolly: Welcome back to The Offally Offensive.

 

My guest today is one of the most notorious and scrutinised figures in Australian activism, Blair Cottrell. For over two and a half hours, we dissected his decade in the public eye, focusing on his successes, his failures, and the controversies that have defined his time in activism. We talk about the rapid rise and the complex collapse of major movements like the United Patriots Front and Lads Society, why he briefly stepped away from the movement, and the reasons he felt compelled to return. Throughout this episode, we explore a powerful question. What is the true cost of being unfiltered? It’s a genuine organic two and a half hour chat. Let’s get straight into it.

 

I should probably say that I’m here with this important guest that I have today. It’s Shane Warne’s son, Blair Cottrell! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not that important.

 

Graham Connolly: Why did I call you Shane Warne’s son? [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: There was a bit of a fiasco back in the Covid days where I heard a rumour. I heard a rumour that Shane Warne had gone overseas to try to save himself from vaccine poisoning or something and that’s why he died.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And so I shared that rumour with some people and I heard that through family, friends.

 

Graham Connolly: What was funny was, is that that was the first time I ever seen you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really?

 

Graham Connolly: So you got me like, you got me with that! And at the time, I was of course, anti-Covid, anti-vaccine. I was sending that to my friends in Ireland going:

 

“Look at Shane Warne son’s come out and said this….”

 

And then like literally, like 12 hours later, I found out that I was:

 

“Oh, it’s this guy called Blair Cottrell.”

 

Blair Cottrell: If you watch the video. I never claimed to be Shane Warne’s son.

 

Graham Connolly: No. But I only seen like a little snippet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone, some international news, including Indian news. I think cthey shared it saying:

 

“This is Shane Warren’s son.”

 

And everyone believed it.

 

 

Graham Connolly: I believed it. I had to literally 12 hours later, I’m like frantically typing to my mates going:

 

“It’s not Shane Warne’s son!”

 

Because your credibility is important to you when you’re sort of Right-wing, you’re anti-establishment.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You got to protect your credibility. So straight away, I had to correct the record. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I didn’t even know about that. Tom Sewell sent it to me with a crying, laughing faces.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because he saw it going viral. I was late to the party. I was at work, at home. I hadn’t even seen it yet.

 

And then apparently. Yeah, but I’m not Shane Warne’s son. My name is Blair Cottrell.

 

Graham Connolly: This is Blair. Yeah, thanks for coming in, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no worries, mate. It was a bit of a trip out here to Geelong.

 

Graham Connolly: It is from Frankston. It’s like two hours. It’s all the way around there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Last time I came to Geelong. [Graham goes off camera for something] Yeah, no worries, mate. Yeah, I noticed.

 

Graham Connolly: There’s still a learning experience for me here.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you’ve recently had a baby?

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve had a baby recently, yeah. Well, Katie had the baby.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I won’t take credit.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, is it the first one?

 

Graham Connolly: First one, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Congratulations mate.

 

Graham Connolly: Thank you very much. Yeah. It’s three months old now. We had her here in this very living room. Had her, just me and Katie.

 

Blair Cottrell: Home birth?

 

Graham Connolly: No midwives even. We didn’t even have, like, normally you’d have a midwife, you have midwives from the hospital or whatever. But we didn’t have any with midwives or anything. So kate did very well.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard a lot of that going around lately.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Especially since that pandemic fiasco. There’s a lot less trust in the official medical institutions and people are just kind of going natural.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And interestingly, my sister did the same thing. She’s got two young boys now. She was told she would never have kids. She had endometriosis and there was problems with her reproductive system. But she focused herself on healing and she had two boys, naturally. Home births.

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: And there’s nothing wrong with them. They’ve had no vaccines and they’re the biggest, strongest, healthiest boys you’ll ever see.

 

Graham Connolly: You notice it with the kids, don’t you? The ones that are not vaccinated?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Oh, well, I don’t know. I’ve got nothing to compare it to because I haven’t seen that many different babies. But I have noticed that the kids that don’t get vaccinated and so forth, they don’t seem to have many problems.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, no, I’ve noticed this. We had a couple that used to play a game called Vaccinate or Not. So like every child that we’d meet we literally have a little game with them. It seems like a bit more. But where the game, they’d guess, was the child vaccinated or not? And the funny thing about it is you’d always find out because the parents of vaccinated children are always very fast to brag about it. They’re very proud of themselves.

 

Blair Cottrell: Still these days. You think they would be?

 

Graham Connolly: I think they still are, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you think that’s about?

 

[04:54]

 

Graham Connolly: Being accepted, socially, I think. Comes back to, especially women. I think women have always needed to be part of the tribe socially, haven’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe also it’s a way to cope with the guilt that perhaps they were wrong.

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s:

 

“Well, I did the right thing. I vaccinated my child. I’m a good person.”

 

Maybe trying to block out the possibility that maybe that wasn’t the right choice.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. There’s the old saying, it’s easier to fool a man than to convince a man he has been fooled!

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately, that’s true.

 

Graham Connolly: It is true.

 

Blair Cottrell: One of the ways I got started in public commentary, activism, was to try to convince Leftists that the whole world view they’d been sold was just kind of a modern communist propaganda trope. And I was convinced I could do it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I angered a lot of them. I don’t know if I converted any, but that’s the way I first got started, with a whiteboard in my bedroom. That was back in probably 2015, early 2015, I think.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, I think before I ever got involved in real life doing anything, what I was trying to do was I had this thing in my head where if I can wake up my family and my loved ones and you can wake up your family and your loved ones to “wake up” then we’ll reach critical mass and everybody will wake up!

 

But it’s not as easy as you think it is! Even just to wake up to people that you think are going to be receptive to it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Your family, are they here in Australia? Ireland?

 

Graham Connolly: Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve got a brother in Canada.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: And the rest are in Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you grew up in Ireland?

 

Graham Connolly: I grew up in Ireland. Moved here when I was like 23. Came here for a holiday.

 

Blair Cottrell: Southern. Northern?

 

Graham Connolly: Southern. Right in the middle, little place called County Offley.

 

Blair Cottrell: That would make you Catholic?

 

Graham Connolly: That would make me Catholic, yeah. Grow up in a Catholic school, all that sort of thing. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting! That would have been very, …

 

Graham Connolly: It’s actually insane! You, like, you don’t realise it comparison, but it was like the Catholic Church had a real grip on the school system in Ireland back that time.

 

Blair Cottrell: What year would that have been?

 

Graham Connolly: I would have started school probably around 89.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: 88, 89.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was born 89.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Right. So I was probably starting school around then. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep. Was there much. I suppose there was a lot of that sort of Catholic nationalism going on, Irish nationalism. But if that’s how you would describe it. Was there much conflict between the Catholics and the Protestants around that era?

 

Graham Connolly: There was in a, but it was light hearted. So where I’m from, I never actually thought much about it. But we had our own church. They had their own church. But there was a small population of Protestants where I was from. They had their own schools, their own churches.

 

Blair Cottrell: But they still lived in the same region.

 

Graham Connolly: They still lived in the same villages. We had a handful, like, I’m from a village of like 300 people and there was like a handful of families in that village that were Protestant. But they usually lived on the outskirts of the villages, nicer houses [chuckling] and a little bit of land and stuff like that. But it was funny because even as kids we didn’t understand what the difference was between Catholics and Protestants. But you still snipe at each other, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that because it’s a cultural thing?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s a cultural thing, I think it’s no different than you snipe at the Travelers. The Travelers snipe at the settled people. You just always have conflict, I think, between people.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a tribal thing, though, isn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: It’s a tribal thing, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think people almost need to feel like they belong to an in-group and they also need an enemy. Even if everyone is the same, they’ll find a way to make an enemy out of the people over the next hill.

 

Graham Connolly: But it was funny, like in that, where I was from, in the village I was from slagging matches were to go. Everybody loved to slag each other. It was like quick wit and just slagging off each other, whatever you could think of to make each other. But it was no real hard feelings involved in it. It was just people trying to be funny towards each other, taking the piss out of each other. It’s just an Irish thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And it was the same. The Protestant would just give you one extra thing that you could slag them over and the same in reverse. But they still came down and played soccer with us, like played football in the park. Do you know what I mean?

 

 

So it was like this weird divide that was there, but it wasn’t actually there. You didn’t go to the same schools, you didn’t go to the same church, but you played football together, you still hung out together.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, you still went trick or treating on Halloween together and stuff like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is this just because maybe your village was low population and it wasn’t particularly vicious, the division?

 

[09:06]

 

Graham Connolly: Well, I think in the Republic of Ireland there wasn’t much division anyway by the time we were growing up. It was like almost as if., … And the Northern Irish people would often say that they were abandoned by the Republican Irish people like that once we got our independence, it was like:

 

“Whoa, we got our independence. Turn their back on them, kind of thing!”

 

That can be debated because there’s an awful lot of people in the Republic that still don’t accept that it’s not a united Ireland. So but there is still that little bit of jabbing that goes on there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. When did you last go back? Have you been back for a visit?

 

Graham Connolly: I used to go back once, basically every year. But when Covid happened I haven’t been back since. I got a dog. Well, you probably heard howling there a second ago. [chuckling] I got a dog.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a big dog.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I got a dog when Covid happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: It nails you down sometimes, …

 

Graham Connolly: Sometimes you don’t like, think through everything about like, I love the dog. The dog got me back out and about, got me back training. Because you have to start walking the dog.

 

And when I start walking the dog, I had become a little bit of a bloody couch potato to be honest with you, I’ve been working the same job for 10 years and it was an office job and stuff like that. So then I got the dog. And it’s when the novelty wears off a dog, that’s when you find out who you are, I’ll tell you that now. You get a dog and like you’re., … Because, it’s the fairy tale again. You think of how nice to have a friend there, have it out there. And for the first three weeks it’s new, it’s fun! But then it’s a chore. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, are you going to keep walking this dog every day and the novelty’s worn off? Like the new car novelty. Once the new car smell has worn off, [chuckling] worn off the dog, are you going to keep bringing it for a walk every day?

 

Blair Cottrell: It becomes a time and money pit, doesn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: Time and money pit! And then it’s like, now you have to get through that period of:

 

“Fuck doing it!”

 

Like almost that period of regret.

 

And if you do, because you have to then, because it’s a responsibility, then you come out the other end loving the dog.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got a love hate relationship with dogs myself.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think suburbia in particular can be a cruel place to have a dog.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It can be.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because they can smell and hear everything.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’re not typically raised or bred to be around that much constant stimulation.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So it can be very stressful for them. They’re supposed to guard livestock. They’re supposed to have a lot of land to run around on. They’ve got a job to do and they’re proud of their job. They understand their job. Whereas in suburbia they’re sort of just suffering alongside you.

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve noticed even with my two, there’s a couple of dogs down the way and I think they be left out or whatever. It’s like one of those things where people got dogs and then they just can ignore them. They basically probably get a bowl of food every day and they’re just ignored.

 

And sometimes you hear them whimpering and whinging and crying and giving out, and it affects my dogs! You can hear it, because they can hear these dogs suffering, like I’m telling you, I agree, I think that you’re right.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s misery loves company man. Humans, they’re suffering here in suburbia in this unnatural environment where we develop cancers from all the radiation through the air and the Wi-Fi and so forth. And that’s why the dogs get cancers as well. Because it’s an unnatural environment.

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: And we have to subject the poor beasts to the same suffering that we’re in. We can’t do it ourselves!

 

Graham Connolly: And that’s why in the West, we have dogs that have behavioural problems. It’s weird, right? Because if you go to places like Mexico or India where these dogs are just roaming the street.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean behavioural problems?

 

Graham Connolly: Like dogs getting anxiety and shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Are they on medication?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, on medication! [chuckling] Like people give their dogs medication in suburbia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think my dog’s got ADHD!

 

Graham Connolly: Mine get to go chase rabbits and stuff like that every day. So they seem pretty good. But a lot of people have their dogs on medication for anxiety.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve known cats that are on that kind of thing. I’ve known diabetic cats that have to have their insulin shots.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, right. And even there’s a guy, I don’t know if you ever seen Caesar Milan. The Dog Whisperer like on YouTube. He’s pretty bloody good to watch sometimes, like his videos and stuff like that. But he turns up and it’s always these Western dogs basically like suburban dogs that just have serious behavioural problems like their barking and just like biting other dogs, fighting other dogs, all kinds of carry on. And he always makes the comparison that if you see these street dogs in India that have like three legs and like their tails off and like these dogs have gone through the wars.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t want to imagine what happens to dogs in India. The poor basterds!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

[13:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But dogs on medication is interesting. Medication is a double edged sword though. Isn’t it? It can prolong life, but what quality of life is it prolonging at the end of the day?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I’m alive now because of medication, I can tell you that.

 

Graham Connolly: Really?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well think about it. Like you could possibly say the same for yourself. You had a bad infection.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, 100% actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. We would typically die of, …

 

Graham Connolly: I had my appendix out when I was a kid.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there you go. Often without antibiotics, deep tissue infections or even just sinus infections. They were a common killer of men for a long time. Did I looked up recently the average life expectancy for the standard human in 1900 was 32! 32 years old was the average life expectancy* for you and me in 1900.

 

[This figure is misleading as it was due to a high death rate for new borns and young children, etc.]

 

And now it’s gone up to about 76 or something.

 

Graham Connolly: I didn’t have my first baby till 42.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there you go.

 

Graham Connolly: You know when you put it like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes sense because when you walk through., … Because I went to England last year, October last year. And when you walk through the graveyards on a lot of the stones there’s this guy’s dead 22, this guy’s dead 28. And you’re thinking, why so young? And it’s disease, infections, things that they didn’t have medicine for 100 years.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. But it became corrupt, didn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Like I said, double edged sword.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s a double edged sword. So like they discover these things like penicillin and discover these things that save a lot of lives and yeah. Like fighting against disease and fight against this and fight against that. Fight against infection.

 

Blair Cottrell: Pharmacology. Well, the Greek word for witchcraft is “pharmakia”. It’s pharma.

 

So the Greeks understood witchcraft as a form of potion making or drug brewing, you might say. And just like in traditional European folklore, there’s good witches and bad witches. And so Medicine can be used for good or bad, but there’s a whole industry. I don’t know if we’ll get started on it, but the first time I considered the lucrative and ruthless exploits of pharmacology was 18 years old. I was working in the city Melbourne. Would have been roughly when you arrived in Ireland [Australia], I reckon, 2008. And I saw on the ceiling or the roof of Southern Cross Station, huge banners! Huge, big banners saying:

 

“Are you feeling down today? It could be depression. Call this number.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Trying to convince everyone they were depressed. And I thought. I didn’t think, maybe I’m depressed. Maybe that’s what everyone else was thinking. I was thinking:

 

“Why are they putting so much effort into trying to make people feel like they’re depressed?”

 

And then I looked into the number on the bottom and I did some research and I found out in certain states in America, you’re allowed to advertise prescription drugs like Prozac antidepressants, directly to the public.

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: Just on TV:

 

“Prozac. Make your life better. Come and buy it from your local pharmacist!”

 

Or go get a prescription for it first, whatever. In Australia, you’re not allowed to do that. You’re not allowed to advertise the drug. So instead they advertise the symptoms.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s a way around it, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: And then you call Beyond Blue, or you call your psychologist, and then you end up with a psychiatrist. You get the prescription, you’re on the drug.

 

Graham Connolly: Everybody’s on it! Everybody’s on it. Fucking crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Something like a third of all people are on some sort of prescription medication for their mood. It makes you realise the kind of things that humans have been through in history, but now the stress of your mortgage or something is too much.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It doesn’t really make sense to me.

 

Graham Connolly: No, it’s crazy, isn’t it? Yeah. It just goes to show what we’re not made for, though. We’re not made for that stress and trying to pay a bloody Bill or something. I think we’re made for war! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of us.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s different castes of men.

 

Graham Connolly: There is, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, have you heard of the caste system? The warrior, the merchant?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, a little bit. Tell me more.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what do you think you belong to?

 

Graham Connolly: Oh, warrior caste, I reckon, because if I look at my name, the Connolly name, it goes back a thousand years. Thousands of years, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where does it come from?

 

Graham Connolly: Ireland. Well, the Celtics.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does it mean, Connolly?

 

Graham Connolly: It means “fierce as a hound”.

 

Blair Cottrell: Ah.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So it’s got to be war! And Ben did a lot of research recently. You know Ben, our man Ben?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Ben did a lot of research recently. And it’s funny that his mother’s side of his family and my family name have mad connections back in the day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like how was that?

 

[17:06]

 

Graham Connolly: His family were like farmer caste in Ireland and ours were warrior caste and apparently like we used to work together, like we defend their farms and shit, way back when. So the mother side of his family.

 

But I want to talk to him more about. Because we just talked a little bit about over text like. What’s the name? I’m trying to remember it. Because his mother’s family name changed their name. It seems like they left and then came back like hundreds of years later to Ireland and then took back their Celtic name or whatever. So they left their Celtic name behind, went to France or somewhere like that. And then they came back hundreds of years later and took back their Celtic name. And then there’s this connection to the Connolly clans in Ireland.

 

So the Connolly clan in Ireland as well you can trace back to the what’s called the four tribes of Tara [sp] of the Hillitara [sp]. So it’s like four very prominent tribes way back when, … And then even before that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Prominent for what purpose?

 

Graham Connolly: Like basically they ruled over Ireland. Like these four tribes of Tara

 

Blair Cottrell: Landowners?

 

Graham Connolly: Landowners and yeah, like hikings [sp] and stuff like that that’s what they were called. Like there’s this regional kings.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve known a few Connolly’s.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what that indicates is a lot of people survived from the Connolly line.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Meaning usually that indicates that there was money there or there was power there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Well, no, not when I was growing up, mind you! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But hey, things change, I guess.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did your family when you were growing up have a stake in a certain enterprise? What were they doing for a job?

 

Graham Connolly: No, not really. Not really. No.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s easy to lose.

 

Graham Connolly: I think that’s what happened as well. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: They just lost themselves, I reckon over the years, you know, under English rule really is what happened. You become peasants, like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, it’s the English’s fault!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: If it wasn’t for the poms Graham here would be rich and famous! Those poms have robbed him of his fate, his future! [Graham laughing] Yeah. But my family comes from just dairy farmers.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, right. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They had a fair bit of land, but they were just workers. They were cold, hard bastards!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they disagreed with each other, and the family kind of split apart, and we all ended up with nothing. And that’s what happens.

 

Graham Connolly: It is what happens. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But families who stay together, let me tell you, mate, they make money!

 

Graham Connolly: They do.

 

Blair Cottrell: And these days, families atomizing from each other. By atomizing, I mean every individual in the family going their separate ways, which tends to happen more and more in the modern day.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s kind of become what we do in the West, and it’s wrong. We grew up with this. I don’t know if you grew up with it here, but we grew up with it back home in Ireland, where you don’t talk about politics, you don’t talk about money, you don’t talk about religion. This was like the three things you’re not supposed to talk about because for an easy life, or a comfortable life, but it’s the three things you should be talking about! It’s the three things that rule your life! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Three things that matter.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s the three things that matter! You should be sitting around the dinner table discussing this stuff, educating your children and stuff. But that’s not what happened back then. It was like:

 

“No, don’t talk about that, because it’ll lead to conflict in the family. Don’t talk about that!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. There was never the conflict along those lines in my family, though. It’s not like anyone ever disagreed over politics or religion. People just in the family gradually began to see each other less and less. I mean, we used to get together when I was a kid and have Christmas together. I used to see my aunties and uncles. We used to go and see my grandmother and grandfather.

 

Graham Connolly: Where did you grow up?

 

Blair Cottrell: In Southeast Melbourne.

 

Graham Connolly: So where you are now?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I’ve always lived in the same spot, and my family was kind of all around there. My family was originally from the bottom of Falls Creek at a town called Mount Beauty. A lot of dairy farming land around there. My uncle recently went back there and bought some property. He’s done quite well for himself.

 

Graham Connolly: Beautiful up there, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: It is nice.

 

Graham Connolly: Real nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s cold in the winter.

 

Graham Connolly: It gets very cold!

 

Blair Cottrell: But I don’t mind that. Yeah, I don’t mind it. I’m always running hot.

 

But what I’m saying is, as time has gone on, I think there’s a certain pressure or influence in society that has caused us all to split off into our own little individual cliques. And so we only spent time with our immediate family. And then it got even worse than that, where now even I don’t even really have that much time to speak to my sisters anymore because I’m so busy. They’re living their own lives. Everyone’s got their own rent or mortgage and car loans and Netflix subscriptions.

 

Whereas if we could all come together and reclaim a stake in a certain enterprise, even if it was just like soap making or carpet laying or something, you know what I mean? Then you can really start to like establish a bit more for our wealth.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, you actually see, is it the Mormons or something over here? I’ve noticed that. So in my job we have a factory off the office that like manufactures steel products and stuff like that for jump farms and all that sort of thing. But a lot of welding and stuff goes on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who has that?

 

Graham Connolly: Just the company I work for.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

[21:42]

 

Graham Connolly: And it’s got like:

 

“We need an air supply.”

 

And I’ve noticed that all the companies that supply air are all Mormons. All of them! Every company!

 

So if you try to play one company off the other, for example, for quotes and stuff like that, they’re actually they’re in cahoots with each other. Like you notice it because they’ll send you an invoice and it actually looks the same as the invoice from the other company. All the companies are sewn up by the same families, like in, same extended family. It’s almost like the Amish.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a shame. It comes down to it, the way I see it, you’re either working with your own family or you’re working for someone else’s.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you’re not working with your own family, in a family owned factory, a family owned business, if you’re going out on your own, which is supposed to be something that’s almost encouraged and admired, isn’t it?:

 

“Oh, he’s out of his own! Good on him! Good on him!”

 

No, you’re just working for someone else’s family interests.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So what’s your grandfather work at?

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a dairy farmer.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Over here?

 

Blair Cottrell: Up in Mount Beauty.

 

Graham Connolly: Up in Mount Beauty, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But then he married my grandmother and they came down and bought some property in Pearcedale, which is a bit inland from Frankston but in the same general region. And he built his own greyhound training facility. So he built a big greyhound track at the front of his property. Had about 30 acres. He built a run, a bull ring and had about 100 kennels. And people would come from all over the country to have their greyhounds trained for racing at my grandfather’s facility. He welded all that shit together himself. An entire lure. And you know the lure that the fake rabbit runs on?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: He got this metal sheet work and built a track, built a big fence around it and somehow engineered the lure. He’s not qualified to do any of that.

 

Graham Connolly: They were so good! Those men, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The sheds, the hundred kennels, the hundred steel kennels with steel Gates. My grandfather somehow welded all that together himself over a period of years. And made a business that made a lot of money. I remember I went to see him just before he sold the property. He recently sold it. And he told me he was making so much money he felt like Santa Claus. I didn’t really know what he meant by that. [chuckling] He wasn’t always that great with his words.

 

 

Graham Connolly: He was probably just able to be generous with it, I guess.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he’s in comfortable retirement now.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you reckon those men, I know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re a different breed.

 

Graham Connolly: They seem to have so much more time in their day and I don’t know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s because they’re working on their own property.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. They don’t have their phone, they don’t have the bloody television, they don’t have the laptop. They don’t have any distractions really.

 

Blair Cottrell: Give me 20 acres and I won’t need any sort of social media. I won’t need anything. 20 acres with plenty of work to do and an idea in my head and I’ll get up 5 AM every morning, I’ll work on it till dark. And that’s what my grandfather did.

 

Graham Connolly: And then they had community as well. So if they were busy, if they needed a tool that they didn’t have, didn’t have to have the money to go and buy that tool, they could borrow it from the neighbour.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, until they get going.

 

Blair Cottrell: And my old man, I remember my dad’s got three brothers and my dad and his brothers would go over there and give him a hand every now and then when he was still building it up. I remember going as a kid and helping dig holes, post holes that were going to be the fence around the greyhound track in the front paddock. And so yeah, it was all kind of a family made business but everyone’s kind of gone their separate ways, as I said. And I’m not really sure where the wealth’s going to end up.

 

Graham Connolly: So your dad didn’t have any interest in the greyhounds?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not necessarily. My dad was, … Greyhound training it’s a brutal business.

 

Graham Connolly: It is, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If a dog breaks a leg, it gets shot!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I’ve got cousins that are into a back home in Ireland.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Not to that sort of scale, though.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you saw how it happens.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! They love it, though. Like, the people really get into it, don’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a lot of money in it.

 

Graham Connolly: And it’s like, we love our dogs. And then you add another aspect to your dog. Like you said before, now you got a useful dog, a dog that has a job to do, a dog that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Still, I gotta say, if you loved dogs, you probably wouldn’t want to be in greyhound training!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, probably not.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t go as far as saying it’s cruel, but they all live in tight little kennels. They exist only to run and make money for their owners.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And as soon as they can’t do that anymore, they generally get shot.

 

[25:41]

 

Graham Connolly: Have you noticed a lot of people now are adopting greyhounds?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve noticed that.

 

Graham Connolly: You know what?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s a good thing.

 

Graham Connolly: It is good. But you know what’s funny about it? Greyhounds in Victoria are not allowed off leash at all! Even in off leash parks.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that?

 

Graham Connolly: I think it’s because they have that drive to chase, rabbits, the lure, and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll run over a kid or something?

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe. I think it’s a bit unfair because they’re the most well trained, disciplined dogs that there is.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ve got a great nature.

 

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And they’re so well trained because it’s pretty cruel, like. And it’s strict to train. So you see people nowadays with a greyhound. If you see people walking a greyhound on a leash, the greyhound is perfect.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: A greyhound walks perfect on a leash. But it can be deceiving. Because the person that’s walking that greyhound might not be very experienced with dogs at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But they look like they are. But if something goes, like, if another dog runs up on them. It happened here. One of my dogs got out. And this is when I first had this thought. One of my dogs got, …

 

Blair Cottrell: With a greyhound?

 

Graham Connolly: So, yeah, it was a woman walking past here with a greyhound.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And I think I was in the shower or something and the door wasn’t closed properly and the dog, but he’s a good dog, so he’s fine. So he ran over. He didn’t do anything. He just ran over and the woman starts screaming!

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s what makes the dog act radically.

 

Graham Connolly: But the dog didn’t because it’s a greyhound!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Because the greyhound is so well trained. The greyhound just knew it was not, … Because as soon as I seen it, by the time I went out, my dog was just sitting because he just went:

 

“Oh shit, what have I done?”

 

So he’s sitting, the greyhound is chill as and the woman is screaming to me:

 

“Get him away! Get him away! Get him away!”

 

Blair Cottrell: You notice women don’t understand dogs.

 

Graham Connolly: No, they don’t!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like they give dogs incessant constant commands. They stress and they scream at the dog and the poor beast doesn’t know what the hell to do. And usually if the dog isn’t well trained, fortunately that greyhound was.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it was, the greyhound.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because the woman’s screaming and carrying on, the dog freaks out and ends up behaving worse than it otherwise would.

 

Graham Connolly: They can go into protective mode. The thing is that greyhound was just so chill, that he knew that my dog wasn’t aggressive either. Like so the greyhound had more sense than the woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: For me, dogs are easy. They respect strength.

 

Graham Connolly: They do.

 

Blair Cottrell: And to a dog, strength is self control, containment.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You stay calm, you don’t give the dog a command unless it’s necessary. And you say as little as possible and if he doesn’t listen, you give him a foot in the ass. That’s really simple.

 

Graham Connolly: Me and Kate takes two dogs for a walk every morning down to Point Henry, right down to the beach to chase rabbits and stuff like that. But every morning the greyhound gets, he gets, … The Dane gets really excited! Really excited!

 

Blair Cottrell: Your Dane?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, the Dane. And normally I don’t have time. Normally you just wait for five minutes or whatever till the excitement goes out of the dog. Then you go. But what we do is we put the dogs into the back of the van. We got the baby in the seat, one of us is in the back. We just don’t even look at the dog. So the dog’s like excited. Like you don’t even, you don’t say sit down. You don’t. You’re quiet, nothing. And you don’t start the car or else you will start it sometimes, but you don’t move it.

 

So we will just sit there, sit there, sit there. And after about 30 seconds, or a minute, the dog will do a yawn. And that’s where I’ve seen this, like on the dog training videos. That’s where something, a switch happens in the brain.

 

Blair Cottrell: They get bored. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: They does this big yawn and then we’ll drive off. And he’s calm.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: I have to remember that.

 

Graham Connolly: You have to wait for the yawn.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And then they’re ready to go.

 

Graham Connolly: And then they’re chill.

 

[29:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So what first got you into the, … Would you consider yourself, like, politically. We’ll talk about politics now a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, why not?

 

Blair Cottrell: You ready for that?

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that allowed?

 

Graham Connolly: That is allowed.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right.

 

Graham Connolly: This is called the Offaly Offensive, after all.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, well, we’ll keep it in the realm of offensive. What you would describe yourself as? Nationalists? National Socialist?

 

Graham Connolly: I would describe myself as a National Socialist, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So to a lot of people, that’s very heavy. And what’s your understanding of National Socialism?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, to be honest with you, I’ll tell you how I came to it is that I suppose growing up, I’m the sort of person that always, I didn’t necessarily read too many books. I didn’t necessarily read into all these different ideologies or anything. I just always went with my gut, what I feel is right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Instinct.

 

Graham Connolly: Instinct rather than, … And I always even when there was social pressure to say that this is okay or, later in life, it was the gender stuff. Now, that’s radical. But even earlier on, like, I can’t think of any examples off the top of my head, but anything that was sort of been put to me as the socially accepted thing, if it didn’t seem right to me, I would go against it. I was like:

 

“No, I don’t accept that’s wrong! That’s completely wrong!”

 

But I didn’t know I was a National Socialist until sort of years later. So for years I just found that I was going more and more and more and more against the grain of society, against what has been sold to me as, this is right. It’s not right!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, was there a triggering moment for you, that you remember?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, eventually I read Mein Kampf. But the reason I read Mein Kampf eventually was because I was being called Nazi so much online and I was defending myself so much. [chuckling] I, like, we all probably went through it. Like, we’re gone through it. I thought I was real clever by going:

 

“How can I be a Nazi? I’m not a socialist!”

 

Like, that was my stupid answer. Like, do you know what I mean? I’m not an Nazi. I’m not. This was back when I was denying being a Nazi. I’m still under:

 

“I’m not a Nazi. Like, this is just what I believe.”

 

But then it happens so much because what I was doing, I spent an awful lot of years just bickering with people, wasting time online, bickering with people and trying to change people’s mind. Trying to red pill people, as they say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But still not calling myself a National Socialist.

 

But in hindsight, I always was a National Socialist. I think I was a National Socialist from birth basically. Like just born! Natural law. That’s what I believe in. Like, almost all our things I believe in is natural law, you know, strength, the right of conquest. Like, it all seems obvious to me. When I say “the right of conquest”. Have you ever heard of the right of conquest?

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course. Yeah. Might is right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, kind of to an extent. Yeah. The right conquest. The best way I can understand the right of conquest is kind of like similar to how when big ships, like Cook’s fleet arrived in Australia. That would be, I think, the only equivalent nowadays to, … Because people don’t seem to be able to, … They like to look back and try to judge that through today’s eyes. And you can’t do it.

 

So I think the only way you can really judge that is if you can imagine a spaceship of space aliens that have arrived from bloody the other side of the galaxy or something, and have been traveling for 10,000 years and they are all of a sudden like Independence Day type shit, they just arrive through the fucking clouds.

 

Blair Cottrell: What are they supposed to do, go:

 

“Oh, there’s already people here. We’ll just go!”

 

[chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! [chuckling] So they arrive all right. What if they’re so far advanced that we’re ants, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: If they manage to get here, chances are they would be.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, they’re so far advanced that we’re ants. So, like, it’d be like an ant trying to communicate with me not to walk on his nest, eh?

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. That’s actually why Stephen. I think it was Stephen Hawking. I won’t attribute it to Stephen Hawking because I’m not really sure, but it was someone of that category of super smart individual. He was against sending radio signals out into space, …

 

Graham Connolly: For that reason!

 

Blair Cottrell: For that reason. Because he said:

 

“Any potential alien civilisation that is advanced enough to receive, interpret and trace those signals back is going to do the same thing to Earth that every European colonist did to every other country.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the mathematical thing to consider. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So like I always try to put myself into the mind of a person in that scenario. All right. And you’re here going:

 

“Well let’s say we tried to communicate with them.”

 

We tried to go:

 

“Hey, yeah!”

 

Like basically like an ant waving at me:

 

“We’re here! We’re here! What the fuck are you doing?”

 

Like you know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Magnifying glass.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, but maybe they might not even have any malice towards us, because I don’t have any malice towards the ant nest.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, you don’t.

 

Graham Connolly: No malice.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’ll stand on it because you’re bigger.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it’s just insignificant to me. It just doesn’t even matter, you know what I mean? So there we’re here going basically trying to get their attention. Yeah, but what if they’re so much more powerful they don’t even hear us. Like they’re not even, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s very naive.

 

Graham Connolly: So now we have a choice, don’t we? We have a choice that we can either., … What are you gonna bloody roll over and die? Are you gonna just survive in this new reality?

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you believe in aliens? Do you think they real?

 

[34:08]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I do.

 

Blair Cottrell: What kind of aliens do you believe in?

 

Graham Connolly: All kinds, I think because it’s just like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think they have influence over Earth now or?

 

Graham Connolly: Oh, let’s see, that’s a real, … That’s an interesting question.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s something that I’ve thought about but I haven’t been able to draw a conclusion.

 

Graham Connolly: I won’t be able to draw a conclusion, either.

 

Blair Cottrell: It feels like it would make sense if you consider that every different species of humanity is being pitted against each other.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: With a common enemy.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And we as a species will actually tear each other apart and downgrade ourselves in the process.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s almost like “zoo hypothesis” they call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well before an enemy, before an invader comes into a foreign territory, it’s in the invaders interests to weaken that territory. Military structure, government, as much as possible, have it as divided as possible so it’s ready to be conquered easily. And it almost feels like that’s what’s happening here on Earth, doesn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: Well, like South Park did a, I think it was South Park. Maybe it was one of these ones did a episode which basically like Earth was like a zoo.

 

And it was just like a TV show. Like, so there’s aliens up there watching like the Truman Show. And it’s just like they just put all these different species, like, so lions are from a planet, tigers are from a planet.

 

Blair Cottrell: They just put them all and they, …

 

Graham Connolly: Just like took them all and just dumped them here!

 

Blair Cottrell: Every time there’s a major crisis, or a war, more unidentified flying objects are apparently reported. And that could be the camera crews, you know, … [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Literally. [chuckling] Who knows? Like, honestly, it could be this whole scenario of like, we’re just ants, like, what do we know? But I don’t know. Like, there is the other flip of the kind in the fact that the size of the universe is almost like that. Like, let’s say we had a telescope that could look sort of anywhere within our own galaxy, never even mind all the other galaxies, because it’s just, even, that is just so vast and big to try and imagine it.

 

But let’s say we could like zoom in on every, like zoom in properly and actually focus and see what’s going on there. Let’s say you look halfway to the other side of the galaxy. I forget what size the Milky Way is, but it’s bloody, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s probably unfathomable anyways.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, by the time you zoom in there, the light from that place could have taken a million years to travel here.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, so you could see the past.

 

Graham Connolly: So what you’re seeing is a million years in the past. So even if there was, it’s just the timing is, it’s mind boggling!

 

Blair Cottrell: I was about to say the same phrase, mind boggling! It’s too much for any one man to even consider or think about really. The universe!

 

Graham Connolly: It is fun to think about though, but it’s mind boggling! It’s hard to know. So to think about only 20 or 30 years ago, like, we’d look up at an Andromeda, which is the next closest galaxy to us, and it was just another star in the sky. And then one day we were able, we had a telescope that was able to resolve that and realise, oh shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: But even our own planet is a mystery. Have you heard about the inner Earth?

 

Graham Connolly: I have, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you think about that? Are you sold on it or not really?

 

Graham Connolly: No, [chuckling] I’m not sold on it. I’m definitely not sold on the inner Earth!

 

Blair Cottrell: But on the Agatha, like?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Your man Bird, isn’t it? Is. Wasn’t that his name?

 

Blair Cottrell: Admirable Bird.

 

Graham Connolly: Admiral Bird.

 

Blair Cottrell: This is the guy who flew over the North Pole and apparently went inside the Earth.

 

Graham Connolly: That is interesting. It is interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s been some people who have, how do you say, debunked that they reckon that he didn’t actually write that in his diary.

 

Graham Connolly: Ah!

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone said he wrote it in his diary, or someone said he told the story and then it became he wrote it in his diary. But he didn’t. But I’m not sure. Don’t quote me on that.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. No, I don’t think I buy that one, to be honest. I, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s still a lot going on about Earth that doesn’t necessarily make sense. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I’m a bit of a Simulation Theory advocate, to be honest.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean by that?

 

Graham Connolly: We’re in a simulation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the “simulation”. I thought you said “assimilation”. I thought you were against assimilation! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Definitely! [chuckling] No, I think there’s good possibility it’s a simulation, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: What makes you think that? And if the audience doesn’t know simulation theory, most people probably would know is the theory that we’re living in a computer simulation. That this is not real life, so to speak. It’s real to us as far as we understand what real is.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And it doesn’t even matter if it is a simulation because you’ve got to live by the rules of the simulation anyway. So you still got to go and live your life!

 

[38:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s possible to bend the rules like Neo in the Matrix?

 

Graham Connolly: I think to an extent it probably is. And that’s where you know how people talk about manifestation and the laws of attraction and stuff like that. I think that’s the kind of thing. For example, the more you victimize yourself, the more of a victim you will be, sort of thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you make it a reality by thinking about it.

 

Graham Connolly: You make your reality by thinking about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that that could just be the power of the mind though? Like, naturally, for example, I’m gonna think all day about a bowl of nuts that I want to eat. Then on the way home from the shop, I’m probably going to pull in to buy some nuts and then when I get home, I’m going to pull a bowl out and then I’m going to put the nuts in the bowl, I’m going to eat them. That’s because I’ve thought about it all day. So it’s more that you’re motivating yourself to it.

 

 

Graham Connolly: You could that you’ve programmed it into the simulation. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, right.

 

Graham Connolly: But I don’t know. Yeah, look, it’s a, there’s an awful lot going on that we don’t know. I think that’s what wisdom is though, is knowing how little we actually know.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s also being able to entertain the possibility of something without accepting it. And I think that’s an important thing.

 

A lot of people don’t seem to be able to do that, interestingly. Which I really like to wonder about things like, what if this is true and what if that is true?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And being able to, with a sober mind, just observe what’s in front of you and consider the possibilities without falling too much into belief.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. What do you think? Do you believe in aliens?

 

Blair Cottrell: I just don’t know.

 

Graham Connolly: You don’t know either.

 

Blair Cottrell: For all I know, we could be the aliens.

 

Graham Connolly: Definitely could be. Have you heard the theory that, what is it, is it? I don’t know which one it is. There’s so many theories out there. But one of the theories is that an alien species came down and they took basically the most advanced primate on the planet. So let’s say we were monkeys basically at the time. Well, or great apes, similar to chimpanzees, but a little bit more smarter than chimpanzees, higher IQ than chimpanzees. And they took us and then they just kick started our evolution by like 2 million years or something.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard it. And it does, it makes sense that we’re a somewhat bastardized species because we break down pretty early, we wear out, we probably should live longer. And there’s some evidence that we did used to live a lot longer and grow a lot taller. And so we could be a bastardized version of what we were once created to be.

 

I do tend to lean towards creationism. Meaning it seems like something made us.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: For a specific purpose perhaps. Or maybe just because it could

 

Graham Connolly: Well I tend to lean towards creationism when it comes to the entire simulation, let’s say. But that’s kind of what this comes back to. Simulation Theory, comes back to for me as well. Is the whole thing created?

 

Blair Cottrell: Genetically though, it doesn’t make sense that we’re from this planet.

 

Graham Connolly: I agree. Why do you think that?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s multiple reasons. I’m driving down the street and the sun’s in my face and I can’t see! I need to put specially made glasses with polarisation lenses so I can see properly. And even then it’s kind of hard. And I’m thinking:

 

“If we developed on this planet, shouldn’t I be able to stand the sun glare?”

 

 

No, I can’t! I cant’t even walk outside on this planet without specially designed protective footwear. Yeah, we need specially built shelters with temperature control so we don’t freeze to death or get too hot and die of heat stroke.

 

[Hmm, abos manage without shoes, sunnies, clothes, etc.]

 

Graham Connolly: And then you take my dogs. Yeah, I can bring them out to the outback. I can bring them up to the snow. I can bring them to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Every species on this planet has thick hide, fur, scales, feathers, and we’ve just got this fragile pink skin. If we stay out too long in the elements, we die!

 

Graham Connolly: We can’t deal with the cold, we can’t deal with the heat.

 

Blair Cottrell: But we evolved here and adapted to the environment? Doesn’t seem like we did! [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: Strange.

 

Blair Cottrell: So where are we? I think we’re from somewhere further out from the sun, possibly a bit cooler and not as harsh. Possibly somewhere with less gravity too. A smaller planet.

 

Graham Connolly: But then in a funny way, we can’t deal with the cold either.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. Oh, well, we, …

 

Graham Connolly: So maybe it was similar, that was, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We can deal with it. We could deal with a bit colder. It depends on where you are on the planet. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Except if you take away your claws and your ability to heat.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, it might be that this particular solar system and this sun is just kind of extreme.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, it could be, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But also the gravity is, …

 

[42:43]

 

 

Graham Connolly: There were Red Dwarf suns that would give off less heat and stuff like that, but then the flare more, so they sterilise their systems. So but yeah, who knows, man?

 

Blair Cottrell: I still believe obviously in a form of ethnic nationalism though, where despite the potential bastardisation of our species, I think we still do have to preserve and elevate ourselves the best of us. I think the greatest purpose in life, despite what you might believe, is to produce children that are smarter and healthier than you are.

 

Graham Connolly: I agree with that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t really see any., … For us mortals as individuals, I don’t think there’s a greater purpose in life than that.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, why do we do it with horses?

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s right. Hitler writes about that inMein Kampf. You might have read it. He said:

 

“We’ll put all this effort and finance into breeding the best racehorses, genetically speaking. But then we bastardize our own species because any form of genetic consideration would be inhuman.”

 

It doesn’t make any sense!

 

Graham Connolly: Doesn’t make any sense.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think would put more thought into breeding better humans rather than better racehorses. But we don’t do that. Because that’s offensive. [chuckling] I don’t see why that’s offensive. I’ve never understood.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t, either. No. What do they call it? Eugenics.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I suppose it’s a form of eugenics to consider, but.

 

Graham Connolly: So why is that inherently evil though?

 

Blair Cottrell: But people do it anyway without realizing it.

 

Graham Connolly: Of course they do!

 

Blair Cottrell: Women especially women are very selective about who they are going to breed with. Because they’re trying to breed up even if they don’t realise it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’ll sometimes make a decision based on [word unclear]

 

Graham Connolly: But nowadays, do you think that’s changed a bit in that they’re breeding for like, the ability for men to have money can skew that. Can skew that genetic, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s confused the situation for women. It’s unusual that you’ll find a man that has a lot of money but is also playing the standard role of protector slash predator that they’re so interested in.

 

And so this is why it’s so often the case that women who settle down or marry very wealthy men who are goody, goody two shoes, do as they’re told. If that’s the way you want to see wealthy men. Not all wealthy men are like that. But let’s say for argument’s sake, more often than not a guy who’s making a lot of money is going to be, he’s gone to university. He’s thinking a lot about money. He’s thinking a lot about staying within the system as a reputable man. So often women will cheat on men like that, even if they’re married to them with criminals. They’ll go down the hill and have their fun and then go back to their husbands and they won’t talk about it. I think there’s a confusion there as a result of wealth, a great deal of wealth producing higher status men who otherwise wouldn’t have status without wealth.

 

Graham Connolly: Higher status. Yeah. They’re higher status for not genetic reasons.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, women are primarily, as far as I understand, more attracted to status than anything else.

 

Because even if you consider that the woman is going to go for the strong man or the warrior who’s going to be able to protect her and her family, the man of higher status who has influence over potentially a hundred fighting men is safer to be with for that reason. Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And women are primarily geared to live a safe life and they’re going to be safer with not only the warrior or the fighter, but the man who has influence over a small army.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So that’s why women like status. But they’re confused now, as I said, because of the money situation, providing status to men who otherwise wouldn’t have it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So back into there, a man earned status by beating other men in battle or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Not just that, but by being respected by other men, followed and admired by other men. Not just for his mercantile skills and money making skills, because he was actually a respectable, dutiful, honourable man.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who would give people the chance. But if they wronged him, he would be brutal in response. Right. And men respected him for that reason. They followed him and he’d build a hold fast. And suddenly you’ve got this lord and landowner who has a choice of spouses. And I think that’s the way it went for thousands of years.

 

Graham Connolly: What? That’s actually an interesting point that you make about how there used to be repercussions for wronging another man, even just in a even just in a very slight way.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s dueling. Like if you didn’t like what someone said about you could challenge them to a duel. And if you wanted to stay or maintain your reputation in society, you had to accept the jewel and someone was going to die. So that actually kept men in check.

 

There’s a saying that civilised men are more rude to each other. I don’t know how the wording of the phrase goes exactly, but savages are more dignified in the way they talk to each other because they know they’re risking having their skulls split if they’re not polite!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

[47:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: Whereas civilised men, who are more pacifists, are going to be absolutely ruthless, stabbing each other in the back, stealing from each other and doing everything they can to crawl over the top of each other because they feel like there’s no physical consequence.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Have you heard, I don’t know if it’s a theory, but basically that the whole point of police and the justice system is to take away your obligation to seek revenge.

 

So, for example, if somebody was to wrong you by hurting your wife or your mother or something like that. Right. Normally back in the day, you would seek revenge, and then their family might seek revenge on you, and you get this tit for tat, tit for tat going on. And the whole point, the justice system is supposed to take that obligation from you. This was supposed to do. It’s supposed to take the obligation from you so that you can punish that person. And it stops there. Boom! That’s the idea behind it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it has other obligations now.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. But that obligation seems to be gone now.

 

Blair Cottrell: More or less. Like I sought revenge in a relationship that went wrong when I was young, which landed me in jail, and the justice system intervened and sort of kind of showed me a better way.

 

So it was good to me in that regard. But I gotta tell you, ever since I got involved in politics, I haven’t really seen much justice after that. I mean, you might know I headed up United Patriots Front.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I started that up with a bunch of other guys in 2015.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that was a new phenomenon at the time.

 

Graham Connolly: That grew fast!

 

Blair Cottrell: It was huge!

 

Graham Connolly: Why do you think that grew so fast?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s because social media at the time hadn’t really been used to promote a populist protest group that was nationalistic in essence, or patriotic in its foundations.

 

And also because I think I was relatable, I think the average Australian was able to resonate with me. And the amount of views we used to get on Facebook, I can see why certain elements of society, you know, government, police, were very nervous. Because I could hold my phone up to my face and film myself talking about a Muslim migrant who just shot someone in Parramatta [Sydney suburb/subcity] and this is why we need to stop Islamic immigration, for example. And that video would get millions of views! Millions of views! Amazing amount of reach! More reach than Channel 9, 7 and 10 would get on social media put together.

 

Graham Connolly: You moved so fast that time that they almost couldn’t ban you quick enough! The likes of Facebook and that you survived long enough on Facebook to get these millions and millions of views.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, if you want to ask the question, like, what was that actually put a stop to the United Patriots Front? How was it?

 

Graham Connolly: That was actually where I was coming at next. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, how did it? The rise of UPF, though, was crazy to me. Like, why do you think it was so successful? Like, why do you think, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It was new. It was right place, right time. I was involved in it. I knew what I was doing.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was always a bit of an ideologue, propagandist.

 

Graham Connolly: Did you do anything before UPF?

 

Blair Cottrell: No.

 

Graham Connolly: How did you know what you were doing? I guess is the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It was a combination of intuition and reading about people. I’ve always been interested in people, since I was young. Spent a lot of time in my own head thinking about how people, what makes people tick and how to speak to them. And I learnt how to communicate, not necessarily complex, but multifaceted politics to people in a way they would understand it. Right. I knew that people needed to, … People can always be told the truth! They just need to be told in a way they can understand. It needs to be simplified for them. Right. It’s not necessarily because people are stupid. They’re just mentally lazy. So they need someone to do the explaining for them. They need someone to do the research for them and then lay it out on the table in a way that’s easy to understand.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you think they also have to feel like it’s okay to accept the truth, that you’re representing them?

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course. But I think that’s why I was a good person to communicate the truth to people back in the days of UPF. Because I was a regular worker. I was carpenter. I was one of the people. I was working class. And there was really nothing about me that set me apart from the standard Aussie.

 

Graham Connolly: So you were a carpenter?

 

Blair Cottrell: I did an apprenticeship with my uncle when I started when I was 15. Finished when I was 19. Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: What sort of carpentry work did you do at the time?

 

Blair Cottrell: All kinds. My uncle was a builder, residential builder. So I did house frames, lockups, fixes.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

[51:44]

 

Blair Cottrell: Small extensions and new homes, all sorts of stuff. But because he was a builder, he really used to push us. We would do a bit of bricklaying, we do a bit of plastering. We’d do a lot of overtime, bit of unpaid overtime for character building! You would call it. [chuckling] Because I was young when I started my apprenticeship, I used to ask my uncle:

 

“How am I getting home tonight?”

 

Because I couldn’t drive. I was too young to legally drive home.

 

Graham Connolly: Well you started when you’re 16 or something?

 

Blair Cottrell: 15 I started. 15, yeah. And he was going in the opposite direction so I’d ask him how I’m getting home. He’d say:

 

“You can piss in the gutter and swim!”

 

[Graham laughs]

 

So I used to throw my nail bag over my shoulder and do two hour walk home from the job site. Wouldn’t get home until, you know, 8 o’ clock at night sometimes, and I’d still go to the gym. My teenage years were very difficult but I’m grateful for it because it gave me perspective. It sort of worked the weakness out of me because I was a sook of a kid until I started work.

 

Graham Connolly: Really?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I was really over sensitive and I loved my mother a bit too much and used to spend a lot of time around mum. Dad was always at work and mum was very good to me. So I was probably over sensitive until I had that worked out of me from the age of 15.

 

Graham Connolly: What did your dad work at?

 

Blair Cottrell: My dad was a supervisor for a construction company in the city.

 

Graham Connolly: Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: But he used to do, …

 

Graham Connolly: Did he have a trade himself?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think he did. But because he started with the company young and he stayed with the same company for over 40 years, he did quite well.

 

Graham Connolly: Man. Being the son of a, … Because I see it nowadays, even the guys who work trade. Trade guys work six days a week, man! Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a full-time job. It’s a lifestyle.

 

Graham Connolly: It is a lifestyle. Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Your car becomes like a mobile business. You live out of it, you eat out of it.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everything in the back.

 

Graham Connolly: And I mean they probably didn’t even get RDOs back, … Like they get RDOs now which is like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re working in the city on a union job, you get an RDO*.

 

[* RDO stands for ‘rostered day off’. It is a scheduled day off that employees earn by working extra hours over their standard work hours. They are often accumulated through extended shifts or by working additional hours over a set period, such as a fortnight, or a month. RDOs are part of flexible work arrangements that allow employees to take a day off in exchange for working additional hours over a certain period.]

 

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And we’ll talk about unions a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: I was going to get to that later as well. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But going back to UPF and to answer your question, the original question you asked, why I think it took off was just because it was new and right place, right time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Because you did just mentioned unions. Did you have troubles with the unions? Or did you seen how the unions operated, lead to UPF or lead to an awakening for you? What led you to want to start the UPF, or to want to do this?

 

Blair Cottrell: The unions didn’t have much to do with my ideology, really. And I wasn’t necessarily motivated so much by ideology as I was, by results. I wanted to create a popular counterculture against this whole mass immigration multicultural project.

 

And once the government or elements of government worked out that I knew what I was doing, and that I was against them, they took the necessary steps to shut the UPF down! And how they did that is interesting. Right. Have you heard of counterinsurgency?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You have? If the viewer doesn’t know what that is, it’s almost a method of warfare that was developed by US Army primarily, initially, to deal with insurgent groups, which were rebel Muslim groups in Iraq and Afghanistan during the War on Terror.

 

The primary purpose of counterinsurgency is to “isolate and disrupt”. Okay. Because the army figured out if they just killed these Muslim groups, members of people who were suspected of being members of rebel terror groups in Afghanistan, for example, if they just killed them, more members of the public would actually start joining the oppressed Muslims or the terrorists because they got angry at how the army was actually treating them.

 

And so they realised they had to create a different strategy. And they created counterinsurgency. Isolate and disrupt! Right. And nothing the government does these days is really new. Because the people in government right now, they’re not very creative or thoughtful. They just basically repurpose solutions that have worked well on other problems through recent history. Like, if you think about Hollywood, no one’s coming up with new ideas these days. They’re just repurposing and recycling old ideas to try to get the same result they used to get.

 

And the government’s doing the same thing with political dissidents, both individuals and groups in Australia. And it began with me. Okay. I was the first person in Australia to have my bank accounts disappear. I was the first person in Australia to be charged with what was essentially a thought crime for a Facebook post. I was in court for almost three years fighting a charge for “intent to incite ridicule” in a Facebook post.

 

Graham Connolly: Crazy, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: I was the first person to, …

 

Graham Connolly: Could I go back a step?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: How did you get red pilled? How did you get to this stage?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll get to that. Let me finish, this is a good point.

 

Graham Connolly: Okay.

 

[56:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: So my motivations, I’ll explain after this. But I was also the first person to be blacklisted from all social media. To this day, try to type my name into Facebook or Instagram. You’ll get a warning:

 

“This is a dangerous individual. Are you sure you want to continue?”

 

And you used to not get the option to continue a few years ago. They only added that recently. Right.

 

So this is all an example of repurposed counterinsurgency, which operates within the Australian government right now! This isn’t a conspiracy. They’re called Countering Violent Extremism, or CVE. And their job is to create this layer of plausible deniability for isolating and disrupting dissidents and critics of the Australian government and its policies.

 

What do I mean by that? Well, this is what the American government did to deal with, or the American army, rather, the US Army, to deal with the terror groups overseas. They had to make it look like the people were turning against the terror groups and they had to make it look like it was happening organically, that they weren’t actually responsible for it. Because for any insurgent group. When I say “isolate and disrupt”, well, what does that, what does that mean for you guys?

 

For example, you’re a member of a far-Right group, nationalist group in Australia. Your primary resource is not weapons, it’s not information, intelligence. Your primary resource is the people of Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: Correct.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

So the job of Countering Violent Extremism is to cut you off from the people of Australia! To stop you communicating with them. Internet censorship! And to stop you raising money from them. Bank account closures! To isolate you from the people, because the people provide you with manpower, financial resources and other resources that are essential to you as a dissident group.

 

So there are elements in the Australian government right now designed to cut you off from that, but they can deny that they’re doing it. Social media is censoring you:

 

“Oh, that’s the social media companies. It’s not us!”

 

It’s the CVE department, Countering Violent Extremism department within the government that’s directing the social media companies to ban you guys. And me too, still. Yeah, but they’ll say:

 

“Oh, it’s out of our hands. That’s a social media thing. Community guidelines.”

 

Something like that. Bank accounts getting closed:

 

“That’s a banking issue. Contact your bank. That’s not us.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: What else was the other thing?

 

Graham Connolly: They just decide to close your account, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. The police are setting you up for charges. They’re raiding you on no evidence. They’re trying to put you in jail:

 

“That’s a police matter. That’s not us.”

 

Graham Connolly: They use some sort of like money laundering, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, it makes it look like all of these independent agencies are turning against you on their own. They’re not! The Government’s directing them to do it!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s vicious corruption! It is what I’m saying in essence, and I’ll finish my point with this, because I know I’ve been talking about it for a while now, is., …

 

Graham Connolly: Take your time, keep going.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a government department which is repurposed counterinsurgency, which is treating critics of the government, both individuals and groups, especially organised groups, treating them as insurgents or terrorists! Right. So their job is to isolate and disrupt! And they’ll do anything to achieve their goals!

 

Graham Connolly: So I’m an insurgent? From the different perspective of this group?

 

Blair Cottrell: You are. And you’re being targeted, myself as well, we’re being targeted by organised counterinsurgency. They’re called Countering Violent Extremism. But they’re just the counterinsurgency department in the government, which exists purely to isolate and disrupt dissidents.

 

Graham Connolly: Crazy, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Crazy! But it’s happening.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, I mean, there’s plenty of violent extremism on the Left. In fact, it’s almost the only place that there’s violent extremism. But they’re not countering that.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s probably certain departments that supervise them or oversee what the Leftists are doing to try to make it look like it’s even, but it’s not.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think I’ve seen any Leftist groups experience the same sort of government intervention.

 

Graham Connolly: And Tim [Lutze] made this point. Not unless they are protesting the gun shows or the Gun Experts Expo or something like that. And then they go hard on them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe a little bit.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s it!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s still not as hard as what we, …

 

But to answer your question about what actually shut down the UPF. It’s what I just explained.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The counterinsurgency department within the Australian government called CVE, that was basically developed in response to me and the UPF.

 

Graham Connolly: That was like such a grassroots movement, wasn’t it? Like, you didn’t really have structures in place. So what Tom is trying to build now is kind of, I would say, on the back of what lessons he may have learnt from what you did there with the UPF and stuff.

 

Blair Cottrell: Very much.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, it just goes to show that you laid the foundation back then, that has led to almost everything we see today with us on the steps of Parliament dressed in black and stuff like that. Like, literally, you laid the foundation for it back then.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom’s a very observant, smart guy. And he’s prophetic in a lot of ways.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what he’s dealing with, what we’re all still dealing with, but especially him, is a different threshold of political policing.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: One that I haven’t seen before.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t think anything that happens with Tom is an accident from. Even from his own perspective. Like you say, he’s so intuitive. I don’t think anything’s as rash as it might seem sometimes. Everything seems well planned out to me.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s maybe one or two rash things here and there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Here and there. But in general, the greater, he sees the big picture.

 

Blair Cottrell: He makes it work for him.

 

[1:01:41]

 

 

Graham Connolly: He does. Yeah, he does.

 

And I think he learnt a lot of lessons from you. And that’s why he’s started trying to create these structures. Like, you see a lot of the stuff we do nowadays with our nationals events. Like we basically have a calendar now. It’s almost like a whole new culture that he’s trying to build, but with structures in place, with leaders in place, with all these things, anti-fragility kind of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s more organised than I ever was.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s because that was just a pop up, almost.

 

Blair Cottrell: What he learnt from me was to just never give up and to keep your chin up no matter what! No matter what they throw at you, no matter what they do, no matter what they say, just keep moving forward.

 

Graham Connolly: You released a video recently where it was like. I would call it a tribute to Tom, basically, where you talked about Tom and who he is and how what you know about him.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s only scratching the surface. There’s so much more.

 

Graham Connolly: Right. That’s because I mentioned it to you and you were like:

 

“Fuck, I actually forgot loads of things and all!”

 

But I actually thought the video was perfect. It was perfect lens. It was perfect. And it just really hit the nail in the head about Tom, the kind of person that he is.

 

But if you want, do you want to say anything that you think you missed in that video that you wish you had said?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, about Tom Sewell. Tom and I have spent years together as good mates.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was the first person I met when I began speaking publicly, you know, giving my speeches about government corruption, the Leftists, all that kind of stuff. He filmed my first ever speech. I think it was in April of 2015.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Federation Square. And from then on, I never met anyone who was more of a soldier for nationalism. I mean, this guy just showed up to everything. And for the first couple of years, he didn’t say much. Funnily enough he says a lot now.

 

But for the first couple of years, Tom was just watching. And I didn’t realise back then, but now that I think about it now, in hindsight, he was just a sponge. He was listening to everything I was saying, he was watching everything we were doing, and he was just absorbing all of it!

 

Graham Connolly: It’s almost like lurking. Have you heard there’s a phrase on, like the online Right-wing sphere. There was a phrase that was always like, so saying a new guy come into like a forum or something, and he talked too much and he’d say the wrong things and he’d talk shit, like, say the wrong things, whatever. And the phrase was “lurk more faggot!” And it became a meme. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: If you lurk, you learn.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, like, and then it became a meme, like, I was on one of these forums and I didn’t say anything for months, not a single thing. And next thing I said my first comment and I was like:

 

“Look, I haven’t talked much and blah, blah!”

 

And the first comment back to me was:

 

“There’s honour in lurk more faggot!”

 

Like, [chuckling] so it was like literally complimenting me for having lurked. Like, that was the first time I got introduced to this word, this phrase, lurk more faggot! So Tom was basically lurk more faggot in real life! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: To an extent he was still dedicated. He was still a bit of an ideas man. I mean, we used to have long talks. We used to drive up to Sydney together to attend, and Canberra, to attend some of our protests that we hosted up there. And we had long chats. Thinking back to it, I think it was mostly me talking. Whereas these days it’s the opposite. If we’re going for a long drive now, he’s the one I’m learning from him. [chuckling] It’s so funny how he’s developed into a person who was once kind of a protege of mine, maybe, and now I’m the one seemingly learning from him. It’s like he’s evolved into this different sort of threshold of understanding. And yeah, I’m really proud that, … I’m just proud to know the guy. And it’s rough that he’s in jail.

 

 

Graham Connolly: You said to me, we talked a couple of weeks ago and you said to me they had like a little bit of guilt or something. You almost felt some guilt in that he’s in jail and that maybe if he’d never met me, or maybe that’s not the words you use, but it was, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think that.

 

Graham Connolly: Something along those lines.

 

Blair Cottrell: It might just be a cynical thought process.

 

Graham Connolly: Of course it is. And we all have it. It’s a natural. I think it’s a natural thing. I thought about it after, and I think it is a natural thing.

 

But also, he’s Tom Sewell!

 

[1:05:51]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think he would have gone for nationalism if we didn’t meet, like, whether we met or not, I think he would have ended up on that trajectory anyway, because he was already networking with people online, and that’s how he first met me. He just saw me posting on Facebook about going to this rally.

 

Graham Connolly: I think there’s so many people in the world, though, that never become who they’re meant to be. And I don’t think he can say that about Tom. If you look at Tom as a whole and look at what he does and look at, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But he tried, all he wanted to do, and this was the point I was making with the video that you’re talking about, where I spoke a little bit about Tom’s history. All he’s ever wanted to do is help people.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s all he’s tried to do! He was good at helping people in the army. He figured that out. And so he left the army to help his old man out. Not even because he wanted to, really. And then once his old man was all good, he wanted to become a fire-fighter. You know, they told him, no. Everything I said in the video was true. Then he ends up working with disadvantaged children, but they kick him out because he’s got the wrong views.

 

And then he sets up a men’s club. He literally, with the payout he got. Because he got a discrimination payout after he was kicked out of whatever department he was working for when he was looking after kids and that. He got a 10 or $15,000 payout for discrimination. He spent it all on renting out a facility and filling it full of gym equipment and setting up a space to provide for other men who would experience similar discrimination. And that became Lads Society.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it got attacked! It was in the newspapers. I was a member of that for a while as well. And then out of that, he developed a National Socialist group because he saw that was his only choice as a result of all the harassment and targeted, you know, discrimination that he was still experiencing. And all he was doing, all he was trying to do from the start was help young guys out.

 

Graham Connolly: The man had so much integrity that the path was almost inevitable. You keep pushing a man like that, he’s not going to bend on his morals or his honour or his integrity. He’s just not going to do it. So you keep pushing another step, another step, another step and he’s just going to keep reacting to what they’re doing to him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s not always a good thing, but there is still honour in the personage of Tom Sewell and how he handles things.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just concerned, as you are too, I’m sure, about the threshold of political policing right now! I haven’t seen anything like it. I mean, people getting raided on no evidence for stuff they obviously haven’t done, set up on charges, just either put them in jail or to get them on bail conditions where they can’t protest. They can’t associate. The political policing in Australia right now is really hectic and, yeah, it’s concerning.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’m not really sure what to do about it, [chuckling] to be honest.

 

Graham Connolly: I joked recently because Jacob [Hersant] gave an interview outside court. They actually refused to let us in, we were in supporting Tom in court. And then we went for lunch, broke for lunch and we went down to the local cafe, had some coffee and on the way back up they blocked us all, wouldn’t let us into the courtroom.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: To support them, like, it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s been happening more and more now.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I don’t think they want it to be known that that much support is behind someone that they’re trying to set up and put in jail.

 

Graham Connolly: They’re trying to isolate him and it’s despicable to me! But Jacob was giving an interview to the media and I was like:

 

“You should say., …”

 

But I didn’t think of it afterwards. I was like:

 

“The next time you’re giving an interview, you should say, ‘I can’t give a Roman salute, so you’re just going to have to imagine it.’”

 

Blair Cottrell: [laughing]

 

Graham Connolly: Would they do you for that, though? Just imagine me Roman saluting! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You’re guilty of inciting, you know, offensive thoughts or images. [chuckling]

 

Graham Connolly: In [chuckling] somebody’s imagination. Yeah. You incited a Roman salute in somebody’s imagination!

 

But it’s getting there though, isn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, mate. It’s at the point now where I don’t want to be too much of a black pill, so I won’t explore it too much. But the sensation I’m getting is that we’re moving into very difficult times, Very difficult times in Australia for dissidents, for nationalists, and we have to stick with each other and stick by each other, because each other is all we’re going to have.

 

But you asked what red pilled me. What red pilled you was at Mein Kampff reading Mine Kampf?

 

Graham Connolly: To be honest, the first, … Because I think red-pill is actually a series of red pills, similar to Hitler’s story.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, there’s no single one.

 

Graham Connolly: No, I think similar to the Hitler stuff. When you read Mein Kampf, I was blown away because I was like it’s such a similar journey, because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Which translation did you read?

 

Graham Connolly: Dalton, I think.

 

[See: Rethinking Mein Kampf — by Thomas Dalton]

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that? What’s his name again? Dalton. I can’t remember. Not Tom Dalton. I know which translation you mean. I haven’t read that one, though. So I did. Ralph Mannheim.

 

[1:10:22]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. No, I didn’t do Mannheim. But I think we might have got, do we have Mannheim? No.

 

But 9/11 was my first one.

 

Blair Cottrell: 9/11. What about it? Specifically, the conspiracies?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I was studying.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see Loose Change?

 

Graham Connolly: I was studying architecture at the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: And like, you do a little bit of engineering in that as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you’re like:

 

“No way!”

 

Graham Connolly: So from day one, I was like:

 

“What? No way!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Are you saying that jet fuel can’t melt steel Beams? Are you anti-semitic?

 

Graham Connolly: Yes! [chuckling] I could get arrested for that! [chuckling] it’s getting that bad, isn’t it?

 

But, yeah, absolutely I am! Which am I? The first question or the second question? That’s the question here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember Loose Change documentary?

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t think I’ve seen Loose Change.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was one that kind of exposed a lot of the inconsistencies with the 9/11 story.

 

Graham Connolly: Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right down to the alleged plane pilots and everything. Yeah. How they weren’t really experienced. I won’t get into all the details, but I remember someone dropped a Loose Change, second edition, the DVD. I think it was around, 2003 or 2004. They dropped it in my letterbox. So some conspiracy theorist was going around, …

 

Graham Connolly: Wow!

 

Blair Cottrell: Burning DVDs and just handing them out to people. And I saw it in my letterbox and I thought:

 

“Yeah, I’ll give this a go.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Whoa!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Whoa! That was probably my first time where I was like. Because straight away I was like:

 

“There’s something wrong here!”

 

And I started searching. That was my first entry into the alternative. And then I realised there’s all this information out there. So it was my first introduction to conspiracy theories.

 

Blair Cottrell: You would have been about, what, 17, 18?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I was a little bit older. Yeah, I probably was 18.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I was a kid.

 

Graham Connolly: I think I was 19.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think I was 11. I got up that morning and I wanted to watch my cartoons. And same thing was on every channel. It was just news. And these buildings.

 

Graham Connolly: When was it? What year was 2001, wasn’t it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sorry, yeah, 2001. Yeah. I would have been 11.

 

[See 911 links below in See Also]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I was 18. So, yeah, I remember I was in London at the time when I happened. I was in university over in England.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what were you studying in uni?

 

Graham Connolly: Architecture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, that’s right. And so that was the first one that got you into it.

 

Graham Connolly: That was the one that made me realise that there was this whole world of conspiracy theories.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, that was my first introduction to it, but it was me just searching, going, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s the same for a lot. It was the same for me, too. The first real conspiracy theory I got into was 9/11.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It didn’t start because somebody introduced me to the conspiracy theory. It was the other way around. I just started searching, going:

 

“This can’t be right. Surely there’s people out there, like me who don’t think that the official story makes sense!”

 

But what really got me on that was these engineering tutors, these engineers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Reporting the story, …

 

Graham Connolly: For years later, even, like for years, years later.

 

Blair Cottrell: It just wasn’t mathematically logical.

 

Graham Connolly: Some of the best engineers in the world. Like, I’d be talking to them and I bring it up in the conversation, and you could see them just get visibly uncomfortable, but just completely, what’s the word, cognitive dissonance?

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s still developing. I think the dancing Israelis thing only came out a couple of years ago. That was a big meme. So people are still uncovering more and more facts about how ridiculous the original story was.

 

Graham Connolly: The Building Seven things.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, the third building that just fell into its own footprint for no reason.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And they just happened to move the gold out of it just in time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Just absolutely insanity! So that was my first thing. Right. But that didn’t lead me anywhere, really. That was it. It was just like a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It opened the possibility in your mind, though, that there’s this whole other world of possibility.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And I just didn’t end up stuck in that other world, if you know what I mean. I came back, like that’s what I was going to compare it to, Mein Kampf. So with Hitler, he did the same thing. Like he’d take a red pill or whatever and then after a while, he’d kind of gaslight himself.

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And go back to being in the army for a little while. And then something else happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: You relapse. Every time you relapse, you relapse for a smaller amount of time.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And something else happens then. And it’s the same bloody thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can pause for a second.

 

[1:14:38]

 

 

Graham Connolly: I can’t read it. Oh, okay. That’s all right.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that how far in we are? Yeah. It’s all right.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s all right.

 

Blair Cottrell: It seems to have gone pretty quick. How long did you go with Tim?

 

Graham Connolly: Three hours all together.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Right.

 

Graham Connolly: But like we stopped for coffee and stuff like that and had a little break and then we just went back and but we did three hours all up.

 

So the first one was an hour and 15, and the second part was like an hour and 45. But I hadn’t even decided if we’d break this into two parts. If we just chat away and just whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. How you feeling?

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t mind. Do you want a cup of coffee or anything?

 

Blair Cottrell: Glass of water might be nice.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Just sparking water there as well, if you want.

 

Blair Cottrell: Or just straight water. Be all right. As long as it’s not tap water. If you have milk. I’ll have milk.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, Milk there. So that was my red pill journey, though. That was the start of it, was a 9/11.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: To be honest, I don’t remember then what the next one was or what the next. You know, it was just a gradual. I think it was the wars, the likes of the war in Iraq. Just not being what it seems. Then it was definitely the wars in Syria, the wars in Libya, all these wars that were, … I used to watch, I ended up on this website and it was called truthseeker.com. Literally I used to just go, anytime anything was going on, like there was a war in Syria, I literally just go to Google, the truth about Syria. And then you’d get all this shit and you go, the truth about Libya.

 

Blair Cottrell: You won’t get that on Google now.

 

Graham Connolly: Not anymore. No, not really. No. You got to know exactly where to go now.

 

Blair Cottrell: The original search engines in YouTube were awesome! That was kind of I remember I saw some of my first dramatized Hitler speeches on the original YouTube, back in the day. There was an editor called Norse Wolf. He used to put speeches by both Hitler and William Luther Pierce and even Mosley on occasion. He edited sort of a aesthetic kind of we have our edits these days, the boys make. These were some of the original edits and they were all out on YouTube. But all this stuff kind of disappeared around, 2016, I think. Maybe around, 2016, 2017, there was a big ban that came through. Maybe it was even before then. I just know that you used to be able to get as much Hitler as you wanted on YouTube. Pro Hitler content up until around, 2016, 2017. Then suddenly everything got banned.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. The old Internet was brilliant! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: For me, it’s not, I think the most, the point of awakening, if you want to say, you want to call it that. I don’t see my life as this great, you know, dramatic thing where I’m super important and I was awakened! I don’t think of it that way. I just came across Mein Kampf and I thought:

 

“Oh, that’s Adolf Hitler’s book. Adolf Hitler wrote a book. No one told me that!”

 

They talked about Hitler a lot in history class in high school, but no one ever mentioned that he wrote his own book. Like:

 

“Oh, that’s weird! Why didn’t anyone tell me?”

 

I thought:

 

“Well, this is the evil genius that almost took over the world and gassed all those people. And he wanted to create the blonde haired, blue eyed master race!”

 

Graham Connolly: Should be interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting book! Like why isn’t everyone reading this? Like so couldn’t pass up the opportunity. When I saw it on a bookshelf in Fitzroy in northern part of, it’s like the lesbian capital of Melbourne. I was working on an apartment job out there when I was 18 for this building company. Started reading it and to be honest, at first I was disappointed. I was like:

 

“This isn’t the book of an evil genius murderer!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Tim actually said the same thing. He was underwhelmed, like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I was like:

 

“What?”

 

I was like, he was a soldier first. He was homeless. You know, he lost his mum early in life and he’s trying to be an artist, then he’s a soldier. His chapter about propaganda is good. And the communists. He knew what the communists were doing. Oh, yeah. His ideas about race. The German people need to have their own space, their own country. Makes sense for Germans. I’m thinking:

 

“Where’s the gas chambers? Where’s the evil takeover the world part? It’s not in here!”

 

Graham Connolly: Doesn’t exist.

 

Blair Cottrell: And [chuckling] I’m thinking:

 

“Not only is this not a crazy evil maniac, this makes a lot of sense!”

 

Graham Connolly: No wonder to talk so much about him in school, but never asked me to read his book.

 

[1:18:53]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, they didn’t even tell me he had a book. You know what I mean? They told me that he constructed. Well, I remember in school because I’ve always been fascinated by engineering. I’m not much of an engineer, naturally, but I like really big structures and I really like to see how they put together. And as an architect and someone who studied it, you might share the passion.

 

And so when I heard about the amount of people that got gassed in homicidal gas chambers, I thought:

 

“Wow, those must be some hectic facilities. The Germans are incredible! I thought, I’d love to see those!”

 

Just like to see the complexity and the amount of information like engineering that went into something like that. To gas that many people and burn them all before anyone could see the bodies. I thought:

 

“That must have taken ages to build and how did they do it?”

 

And then they show me these little broken down shower cubicles with wooden doors and say:

 

“Well, this is where it happened.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“What!”

 

I always thought to myself in school, I thought:

 

“I’ll have to look that up later, like on the Internet or something, because there must be more to it. This couldn’t have been where it happened.”

 

And I still believed it because it was in the history books and they were telling me.

 

But then as I looked more and more into it, I couldn’t find the facilities that I was envisioning in my mind that could actually be possible of achieving that.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I was just like:

 

“This doesn’t make any sense!”

 

Graham Connolly: Eventually you end up, I suppose you ended up consuming The David Irving stuff?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not really. I just put two and two together. Because in Mein Kampf Hitler writes that:

 

“The great masses of the people will more easily be fooled by big lies than small ones, because big lies seem incomprehensible, that someone would put that much effort into a lie.”

 

Graham Connolly: My dog going mad there. [dog barking]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. He’s obviously hearing some intrusions, trying to get some attention for some reason. But Hitler explains the nature of big lies or big deceptions for the purposes of propaganda or to serve the interests of a specific group. But he explains it well in Mein Kampf. He uses, he says that most people tell lies in small matters like, “boss, I’m sick, I can’t come into work today”. Yeah, right. They don’t put a shitload into it. They don’t write books about it. They don’t go into universities and lecture about it. They don’t build whole institutions that are profiting billions of dollars around the world from it. Most normal people don’t do that!

 

And so when people see an institution, a whole industry that’s based on historical “fact”, well, they don’t suppose it would be a lie because there’s an entire-industry built around it! But what most people don’t realise, Hitler says, is:

 

“There are (((some people))) out there who do put that much effort into a lie and they do profit that much from it.”

 

It does work to their advantage to that extent.

 

Graham Connolly: Do you know what we don’t take into account, I think or we forget. And I certainly in Ireland and maybe it wasn’t as bad here, but my parents generation were naive! So they didn’t have the Internet. They would believe anything. They were superstitious. It’s not that long ago that people were very superstitious.

 

Blair Cottrell: You got to go easy on them though, because, …

 

Graham Connolly: 100%, I agree.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are just as naive. We just have access to more information.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s exactly right! Yeah. Because I just mean that like it’s not that long ago where the TV was invented, lights were invented. It’s not actually that long ago.

 

Blair Cottrell: Historically it’s a blip on the screen.

 

Graham Connolly: It blip on the screen, and people were superstitious even. Do you know what I mean? But like to believe all sorts of like don’t break the glass or the Mirror and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t walk under a ladder.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, oh, they literally believe, like my mother was superstitious. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard Irish people are very superstitious.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Again, not as much anymore. Because of the access.

 

Blair Cottrell: The world’s been revealed.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! The world’s been revealed. But back that time, the world was a bigger place. Like, you didn’t often travel further than the closest town.

 

Blair Cottrell: You felt like a tourist in the next town.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’d even go to the next town and people there would talk and act strange because everything’s so interconnected now. You see someone on TikTok, all the kids are watching someone on TikTok and then they all start acting and talking like that person on TikTok. And so all the kids from every suburb are dressing, acting the same.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Whereas back in the day, before the Internet, before social media, you go to the next suburb over, as I said, and everyone was kind of weird there.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s funny you bring that up because, where I grew up in Ireland, every little town and village had their own culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Like, so where I grew up, it was very, I said it even earlier, with soccer and football were the two, were the thing. They were big into sport, but everyone had to be funny. Everyone had to be able to take the piss out of each other. Like, that was kind of it just, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australia’s like that.

 

Graham Connolly: Drabs and quick wit was our thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think we’re like that because of the Irish influence.

 

Graham Connolly: If you enter the town up the road, they’re all into motor bikes. Like, so many kids, like, died on motor bikes. Literally had that many people die on motor bikes because that was their culture. Their culture was motorbikes and hunting.

 

[1:23:36]

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what it was? It’ll be one or two people in that town who were really cool and charismatic and they did motorbikes.

 

So everyone does motorbikes!

 

Graham Connolly: Everyone got motorbikes. The culture of that whole town like there was another town, the culture was literally affairs! [Blair bursts out laughing] Like, [chuckling] they’re known for having affairs and stuff. Like, it just becomes the culture of the town. Like you said, there was such a degree of separation between these places.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like almost every town back then had its idols.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: People that were idolised by everyone else in the town who influenced everyone.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But now the idols exist on the screens.

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: And so now everything’s more universal.

 

Graham Connolly: Which has made the world a much smaller place.

 

Blair Cottrell: It feels smaller.

 

Graham Connolly: It does feel smaller.

 

Blair Cottrell: As I said, I used to feel like more of a tourist even in the next town over. But now it’s like every suburb, every precinct almost feels like the same as the one I just came out of even when you go across the other side of the world. Went to England last year, already mentioned that earlier on. And it was different, but it wasn’t as different as I expected.

 

Graham Connolly: No. And you can get there even though it’s a long flight. Yeah, it’s a long flight to England. It’s a tough journey.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was tough, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: But part of I think part of what makes things tough nowadays is everything’s rushed. So even though you’re flying there, it’s a rushed thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: It was the first international flight I took and I took one of the longest ones you can.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t sleep when I’m surrounded by strangers I don’t know, because my nervous system’s firing. How am I supposed to relax and go to sleep when I’m surrounded by Ahmed and Hajib and whoever else is around me on this, because I’m on an Arab flight as well. I think I went with Emirates.

 

Graham Connolly: You fly through Dubai?

 

Blair Cottrell: We went through, was it Dubai?

 

Graham Connolly: Abu Dhabi.

 

Blair Cottrell: Abu Dhabi! Yeah. God, what an experience that was! It smells like. What is it? It smells like spicy hot sand! Exactly how you’d imagine it smells. And there’s proper Muslims in Abu Dhabi airport. Like, they’re looking at you, like they’re going to cut your head off sort of thing.

 

So that might be presumptuous of me to say, but that’s what my instinct was telling me, the way they were looking at me.

 

Graham Connolly: Infidel!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right. But hey, I’m in an international airport. What do you expect, mate. And you know what I did when I got to Abu Dhabi airport, I thought:

 

“I’m gonna get a kebab! I’m in an Arab airport, an Arab country. I’m probably gonna have the best kebab I’ve ever had! Right? They’ve got to do good kebabs here, at least.”

 

So I found a kebab store at the airport. What a piece of shit it was! The meat was dry and crap. The bread was crap. We do better kebabs here in Australia than they do in the Arab airports. Well, maybe there’s some Arab street food you can get once you actually get out into the country. But I gotta say, I was really disappointed by the kebabs at Abu Dhabi Airport.

 

But anyway, …

 

Graham Connolly: The kebabs in England are probably better.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe. Hey, have you ever had., … You’ve had McDonald’s in England, all that sort of stuff. How do you rate the food in England compared to Australia? Much different? I think the dairy’s better. They got better Greener pastures there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, definitely have Greener pastures. Definitely! We got more water as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, the dairy’s noticeably better.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. We can hold a lot more head of cattle on the smaller acreage back in Ireland and England than here. I noticed that. In certain parts of Australia, I think, like at Gippsland, that’s pretty lush down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it depends on where you go. Australia is overall a much drier land.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s why, I guess when you get into like Gippsland, you do start to see cattle in the fields.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Because they got the pastures.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Graham Connolly: Well, a lot of Australia doesn’t have it. No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Had a Big Mac in England. They don’t peel their potatoes at KFC in England.

 

Graham Connolly: Don’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, English don’t like peeling their potatoes. So you get the potato peel in the chips, which I thought was weird because we don’t have that in Australia. The Big Mac I had was awful! I couldn’t even, … And that’s saying something for me, not to finish a piece of food!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’ll eat anything! I’ve got no dietary limitations. I’ll eat anything. And the beef was so stale and dry in the Big Mac in England, I had to throw it away.

 

Graham Connolly: In Ireland, I used to prefer Burger King, which is your Hungry Jacks.

 

Blair Cottrell: I never tried it there.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, Burger King is really good! It’s much better at home than it is here, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we did try, that chicken place. What’s that chicken place? It’s famous for some reason. Was it Popeyes?

 

Graham Connolly: In England?

 

[1:27:53]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe it was Popeyes.

 

Graham Connolly: I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Popeyes Chicken. Maybe it is. I don’t know.

 

Graham Connolly: Could be. I don’t know. I know England has a lot more different places than Ireland, even.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, okay.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you spend much time in London?

 

Graham Connolly: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: When I was there, I was in Wolverhampton, but I had relations in London, so I spent like a weekend or four days up in London. And that was when 9/11 happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: I was only up there visiting relations for a few days.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So no, I’ve been to London a few times, but haven’t spent much time there, though.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Wolverhampton, though, man! Fuck!

 

Blair Cottrell: What about it?

 

Graham Connolly: It’s like its own city, but it’s kind of like a suburb of Birmingham. It’s real close to Birmingham and it’s just rough! It is!

 

Blair Cottrell: In what way?

 

Graham Connolly: Just blacks!

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh. Even back then?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It was so bad, when I went to uni there, me and like seven other people from Ireland went from college in Ireland and went over there and so we stayed in the halls around. Probably should have rented a house or something like that.

 

But anyway, we stayed in the what they call the “halls of residence”, like, so it was kind of fun and all that sort of thing. But we were on the ground floor and you’d have like, say, eight rooms, so you’d have a corridor. You can go in the main door and then you’d have one corridor this way, one corridor this one. You’d have like six or eight rooms in each one each side of the corridor. And you’d have a main kitchen that you share. You could not leave your room with the window open for five minutes!

 

Blair Cottrell: They climb in the window?

 

Graham Connolly: They’d climb in the window and be gone with your laptop. And they did not care if you came back while they were in the room.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to fight him if you wanted it.

 

Graham Connolly: They just stab you!

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So rough, man!

 

So, like, you just wanted to go for a piss, close your window! Go for a piss, come back up, open your window.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well!

 

Graham Connolly: Fucking shit man! The only good thing about the whole time there was Wolverhampton had got it into the Premier League at the time. They just got promoted the year that we went there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: And so every weekend on match day, you could open your window and you could hear the atmosphere from the stadium. That was literally just around the corner. And that was kind of cool. I don’t know why I remember that, but that’s one of my best memories from Wolverhampton.

 

Blair Cottrell: I noticed a fair more black people in London than there are pretty much anywhere in Australia that I know of, …

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Birmingham, Wolverhampton, man!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s all there is. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think I ever went there. I went to Kennington. We stayed a couple of nights in Kennington, I think. But black people smoking marijuana in public, that was pretty common.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Around that region. And just very loud, obnoxious, you know, screaming at bus drivers and kicking doors because they weren’t opening quick enough! Just stuff like they don’t just, … I don’t know how to summarize it.

 

All I can say is the black people in England don’t seem to appreciate being in England very much.

 

Graham Connolly: No. They’re the same everywhere, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it in their nature to appreciate anything or do they just take advantage?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I don’t think it is. No, no, it’s a sense of entitlement, ungratefulness.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the main ethnic group you notice in Australia, and that’s not White? You know is in Australia that’s not White, the main ethnic group out here? Out here in your way anyway, where you live?

 

Graham Connolly: So here’s still pretty good. Yeah, just here now. When I first got to Geelong, all of Geelong was still White.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: You know, you head down to the waterfront, White people!

 

Blair Cottrell: I know some Indians down there today.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, that’s what I was about to say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mostly Indians.

 

Graham Connolly: Indians and Muslims now down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yep, yep.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, you get on there now and like, they’re playing their own music. So it’s like being in a foreign country. You know, you got all the barbecues down by the waterfront. It used to be always just White people down there.

 

Blair Cottrell: They love the waterfront.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, they love the waterfront. Now you go down on a nice, as soon as it’s a warm day, just flock to there. Take over all the barbecues, have their own music. And it’s the ding, ding, ding, ding! All this fucking shit music!

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re in a country that wasn’t, you’re in a country that was built by another ethnic group and you were a guest, you’d think you wouldn’t be so loud and obnoxious. I mean, that’s how we are when we go to other countries, isn’t it?

 

Graham Connolly: 100%.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

[1:31:58]

 

Graham Connolly: I’ve travelled a lot and you’ve got a lot of respect when you’re in somebody else’s country, like Japan or something. You look around. These are not your buildings. The buildings do not invoke your blood memory, for example. Like, you know that you’re a visitor in these places. I can’t understand, like, even here, even though, like, I kind of mentioned it earlier, too, we were talking that all the towns, villages, the city, you go into the city, all the old buildings, they’re all Anglo-Celtic buildings. You know what I mean? It’s you know, they were built by your people. Even though I’m from Ireland, I come here. I walk the streets here. These buildings are built by my people, by the same blood that runs through my veins.

 

I couldn’t go to India and walk through Calcutta and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Feel the same way.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, and feel the same. And I don’t understand how they can do it. Like, I come here and I’ll never., … Like, I’m always going to consider myself Irish because I am Irish. I can’t just come here and then suddenly be Australian. Like, I came here when I was 23. I grew up in Ireland. I talked to Tim about this a little bit. I grew up in Ireland. I went to school in Ireland. Like, I said this to Tim, like, my daughter can be Australian. She’ll grow up here. She’s of the same blood as the founding stock. Her mother is Australian and I’m of the same blood as the founding stock. Even though I wasn’t born here. But my child will be. But I would never say I’m Australian. I’ve been here 15 years now, but I was here like 12 years before I even got the citizenship, before I even applied for the citizenship.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you are a citizen?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was gonna say, well, you could just say I’m an Australian citizen, but I’m Irish.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah, exactly! Which I am. That’s really accurate way of saying it. Right. But these Indians and stuff come over and they’re calling themselves Australian!

 

Blair Cottrell: You’d have to be really ashamed of where you come from.

 

Graham Connolly: And they are! That’s what it is!

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s also a sub 80 IQ affliction, meaning people who are a little bit less intelligent, they don’t have the humility to acknowledge that they may come from a lesser developed culture. And so they cope instead by demanding equality amongst people who are clearly better than them, rather than acknowledging that those people are better and just appreciating their position as a guest in that country. Instead, it’s a cope, a coping mechanism.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s crazy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Because they actually think they’re better than you a lot of the time.

 

Graham Connolly: They do the same thing no matter where to go, though, then they’re Irish, they go to Ireland and they’re Irish!

 

Blair Cottrell: I almost think it must be an in-joke amongst themselves. They must go home afterwards and laugh at the fact that other Irishmen or Australians or Englishmen actually don’t say anything:

 

“We say that we’re English. We say we’re Australian. And they don’t say anything, those idiots!”

 

Graham Connolly: I think you’re right a minute ago. I don’t think they have the capacity for it.

 

Blair Cottrell: The smarter ones would.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the majority of them, I do think it’s a sub 80 IQ. Because you need to be cleverer than average at least to have the humility to acknowledge when someone else is actually better than you and not hate them for it. Right. So there’s two ways you can look at someone.

 

Graham Connolly: Jeez, the dogs are going off, after me. [dogs making a noise]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. There’s two different ways. There’s the common way of responding or reacting to someone who’s better than you in a certain field. And the common way is to develop copes to try to explain it away:

 

“Oh, he had a better upbringing. He had help from other people. There’s reasons why he’s better than me that make it not fair on me somehow and down with him. Poor me!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The other way, the less common way is to learn as much as you can from the person who’s doing better than you in a certain field. So:

 

“All right, this guy’s doing really well. His strategy, his methods, they must work. What can I learn from this guy? I need to talk to this guy!”

 

Especially if it’s in a field that you’re interested in developing in yourself.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So like the most people, most lower IQ people and most people are of lower IQ, they’ll just resent someone for being better. And I suppose that’s what most Indians do when they come to Australia. But cleverer folks will learn as much as they can.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah. Do you want to take a five minute?

 

Blair Cottrell: Sure.

 

Graham Connolly: So I can feed these bloody dogs.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you fed them already?

 

Graham Connolly: No, I did, but I only give them a little bit. They’re big dogs, the dog will eat three kilos a day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Really? The big one? That’s expensive dog!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. [chuckling] We can just leave that going and I’ll just cut it out when everything’s going. Do you want a coffee or anything like that?

 

Blair Cottrell: One more might help. Graham, if you can get it working. I might just stretch my legs.

 

[1:36:30]

 

Graham Connolly: That brings us to the end of part one. A huge thanks again to Blair for making the trip. Part one has covered a lot of ground, but this episode is not finished yet. In part two, we dive deeper into the real world cost of Right-wing activism. If you value these discussions, please like this video, share and subscribe to the awfully offensive. Thank you all for watching. Your support is what makes this uncensored content worthwhile. We’ll see you soon for part two.

 

[1:36:58]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/19/2025 = 32)

[Newest at top]

greenyfromoz97
1 day ago
Upload this on YouTube brother! These is nothing about this against community standards at all! This it the best best pod cast I’ve listened to in years
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 day ago
Thanks brother. Yea we’re going to set up a YouTube and see how it goes. Thanks for watching and Thanks for the vote of confidence.
1 likes

greenyfromoz97
1 day ago
Loving it, send my love back mate! Awesome podcast !!
1 like

JohlForbes
4 days ago
Very entertaining and nostalgic interview. Like two mates having a chat, good vibes, enjoyed it.
1 like

Girnigoe
5 days ago
Outstanding! An American, here. You men in Australia are at the “cutting edge” of White Nationalism, National Socialism, and activism in general, though a new generation has also risen / is rising in America, it appears. Quite a change from back 20-25 years ago, and here’s to that! Maybe it’s that Australia is smaller, with mostly a more homogenous population, thus less distraction and gate-keeping fake conned-servatives about. Whatever the case, never slacking and don’t give up the ship! More folks than you might imagine have their eyes upon you world-wide. Hail victory and down with ZOG!
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
5 days ago
Thanks for watching brother. Our fight is worldwide. The White man must rise up everywhere. And we will.
1 like

TTFOLEY1914
5 days ago
Nandos chicken I reckon
0 likes

Sieger88
Supporter
5 days ago
A lot of the things Blair complains about is simply due to the fact that our race developed in Northern Europe, we weren’t really meant to live anywhere else.
1 like

akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
6 days ago
I didn’t think you guys would eat a Big Mac. How about the Finkelstein interview about the Big Macs: https://archive.org/details/InterviewWithRabbiAbrahamFinkelstein/Interview+with+rabbi+Abraham+Finkelstein.mp4
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
6 days ago
Yea i don’t eat Maccas these days. I doubt Blair would very often either.
1 like

whatthehehe
6 days ago
PATRIOTS!
3 likes

WhiteBitchTripleSix
Supporter+
6 days ago
“Are you anti-semetic?” YES
3 likes

GigaChud7
6 days ago
You should do a series on the sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland, I’d love to hear the perspective from an Irishman who has our beliefs.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
TimLutze
6 days ago
I agree. Could invite Justin Barrett on for it.
3 likes

Jenny3819
Supporter
6 days ago
Great conversation.
2 likes

SpeedMaker
6 days ago
South Park did an episode of earth being a tv show. Aliens the “Jewzians” controlled all the media in the galaxy. They we’re going to cancel earth. The boys used sexual blackmail to save the planet. I’m not kidding. The episode is called “canceled and is almost 20 yrs old.
2 likes

Chucktt
6 days ago
I didn’t know Blair liked Metallica. Would he like the Load era?
1 like

birdhouse456
6 days ago
Blair’s grandfather reminds me if my uncle. Farmers are used to doing everything by themselves. If they waited for help it would never get done, and they’d be broke.
3 likes

Seanybruv
6 days ago
54:34 – 59:45 this was such a good point
2 likes

Seanybruv
6 days ago
41:30 no animal can directly look at the sun without serious eye damage, there’s no evolutionary adaptive advantage in looking at the sun, the benefit from the sun is light in general, for instance you don’t need to stare into a ceiling light to get the benefit of the light it gives, any animal that tried to stare at the sun would go blind and not pass on their genes. It is the driving on straight roads that is the unnatural thing in that scenario you gave, not the inability to look at the sun. Our early Human ancestors became hairless in tropical climates as a way to regulate body temperature through sweat while endurance hunting and travelling. Most humans have a lot of melanin to protect skin from UV damage as they stayed near the equator. By the time humans or our early human ancestors got to Europe they had already lost their hair, but eventually lost the melanin producing genes because that far north and in a cold climate the UV exposure is a lot less, so we needed light skin to get get adequate vitamin D. It was too fast of a shift in environment to just start growing fur again, so we needed to be innovative to survive in the cold, only those who were smart enough to survive would pass on their genes, part of the reason why Europeans are the most intelligent and innovative species.
3 likes

dailydose_meat
6 days ago
Great show! Blair has to be a regular on the show!
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
birdhouse456
6 days ago
he always muses on the most interesting topics.
0 likes

MonThirteen
6 days ago
Here I was thinking I was going to learn things I didn’t know about Blair but it’s awesome I got to learn alot about you too Mr Connolly. Both very interesting men. Love the fireside chats.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
6 days ago
Thank you I appreciate that. You can tell Blair is a kind and humble man and he’s naturally interested in other people. He was interviewing me as much as I was him and it made for a fun chin wag by the fire.
5 likes

heman1488
Supporter
6 days ago
Awesome podcast! Blair is an Australian icon and patriot.
8 likes

Angelalee0
6 days ago
UPF grew so fast because of you Blair. Your passion and charisma was something unlike anything I’ve seen. Your speeches and your presence made people come together. Those years were some of the best.
8 likes

Dimma1313
Supporter
6 days ago
Great show. Tag teaming questions….love the coexistence between Irish Catholics and Protestants in the Republic.
5 likes

mike33t
6 days ago
Soo good
1 like

esolily
6 days ago
Hail the Connolly clan
8 likes

TTFOLEY1914
1 week ago
Wow ,loved this.amazing chat best I’ve enjoyed in years.offaly was gd with the zoo theory stuff too.interesting shit
11 likes

Laker2103
1 week ago
Great video lads
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript