Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to tonight’s stream. We’re live on Odysee, Rumble, DLive and Entropy. And I’ve got a wonderful panel for you here tonight to discuss the big issue of, well, the last week or so, and it’s obviously Trump’s war for Israel or Trump’s war on Iran for Israel, to be more precise.

 

Now, the guys I’ve got with me I’ll be introducing shortly. It’s of course Natty and Yuro from the Nationalist A-Team. We’re going to cover some of the things we covered last Sunday quickly. And then we’re going to go deeper into things. Everyone’s going to get roughly an equal time to talk. I’m not going to be putting people on an egg timer, but we’ve probably got nine or ten topics and if everyone puts sort of three, four minutes into each topic, it’ll be about a 90 minute presentation. So stick around. It’s going to be pretty entertaining or at least pretty enlightening.

 

You might have noticed I’m not on camera tonight. My apologies for that it’s not because I’m being rude. Slightly under the weather today, actually. I don’t know whether I sound it and if I do, my apologies. But I am doing my best to essentially be as chirpy as humanly possible, all things considered.

 

Now, if you like this stream, please share it. If you really like this dream, please consider making a donation. Please consider contributing to my work. You can do so via Entropy and also directly through Rumble. Anything that is sent tonight, any Superchat, any donation that has a message attached, the message will be read out live on tonight’s stream.

 

So we will talk about that. So if you’ve got a different point of view, if you’ve got something you want to raise, if you think we’ve missed something, or if you just say:

 

“Look, Mark, I really appreciate the fact that you’ve been consistent for the last, 26 years and I want to keep you fighting even though you’re banned from everywhere.”

 

I appreciate that as well.

 

So thank you in advance for everyone who Superchats. You can also donate by crypto all the crypto links in the description below.

 

And finally you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Although I didn’t answer emails this morning, again under the weather. So sorry guys, back to things on Monday. Unless I’ve got some kind of horrible illness that drags on past then and sort of takes me out, which I’m sure I haven’t. That’s quite a morbid thought. Anyway! We are going to get into it now, but before we do that, let’s go around the group and we’ll introduce everyone.

 

Now, the first is of course Natty. You know him from the Nationalist A-Team and also from numerous other streams that he’s done with me in the past. Natty’s a guy that’s been around since the beginning of PA. He’s been to all the meetings, at conferences, camps, etc, and he’s always someone that everyone likes hearing from.

 

In fact, I always say that if I had a wingman on PWR, it would be this guy here. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? I hope you are well.

 

Natty: Yeah, I’m good. I’m enjoying watching Tel Aviv burn. I’m sure we’re gonna talk about the ins and outs of what that means, but yeah, I’m good apart from that it’s been a bit of a crazy week trying to keep up with everything and I think my wife has suffered constantly looking across at me and seeing my face buried in my phone because I’m trying to, I’m monitoring the situation. But yeah, it’s very interesting times.

 

Mark Collett: Do you ever get it where you’re out on the sort of a supposed family event and the wife’s like:

 

“Why aren’t you paying any attention? All you’re doing is sitting on the phone. What can be so important that you need to be on your phone at this family event?”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Look, you know, Israel is on fire. Tel Aviv is being hit with hypersonic missiles. Chill out!”

 

Natty: It’s like:

 

“Honey, there’s cluster munitions going off above a suburb in Tel Aviv. This is really important. [chuckling] I’m watching it right now! It’s amazing!”

 

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] that’s kind of that’s kind of the str. I’d say that that’s the struggle that we have.!

 

Anyway, we’ve also got Yuro with us tonight. He’s obviously famous because Yuro used to do The Absolute State of Britain podcast.

 

And again, he’s a very able wing man. He has been on the National A-Team standing in for Sam. He always has good takes, he’s a funny guy and sometimes I bully him a bit, which is a little unfair, but that’s because I love him and see him as like my little brother, My little brother who needs the odd sort of monkey scrub and jab in the ribs, but he’s like my little brother, so I still love him.

 

Anyway, Yuro, how are you doing, my friend?

 

Yuro: I’m good. I’ve also been keenly paying attention watching Middle East Spectator and other such channels on Telegram. You know, it’s, I think there’s a lot more censorship obviously during the 12 Day War that was going on between Iran and Israel before. It was very much like:

 

“Well, what can we believe? How much are they not showing you?”

 

And it’s just that more. So we see all of Iran’s failures and then some things that’s like disinfo and we see all of Israel’s successes and then some, and some of that’s disinfo. And it’s kind of hard to even know what’s real.

 

[04:47]

 

Natty: That’s a good point actually because just briefly, it does seem like the information blackout from Israel was way more intense during the 12 Day War. And it seems like now because of the scope and the breadth of everything, just more is getting through or you’re able to find out more. And I’m sure this isn’t true, if you check the BBC or just some other like ZOG regime outlet, you’re not going to be seeing anything hitting Israel. But that’s what everyone’s interested in. That’s what everyone wants to see. [chuckling] You know, how many hypersonics hit Tel Aviv? This time, you know what US asset has just been blown up by a drone in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain or wherever it is. That’s what people are interested in seeing. They want to see the underdog smacking the bully in the mouth. And that’s what happens when a cheap Shahed drone gets through a multi-million dollar interceptor screen and like blows up a THAAD [Terminal High Altitude Area Defense] radar system or something. That’s what everyone’s into, right? Everyone wants to see that. No one wants to see like Iranian suburbs being like caught on fire and hit with JDAMs and hit with Tomahawk missiles because that’s just brutal civilian casualties, which is what ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] is good at.

 

Yuro: Well, the funny thing is to see America in this war using the copy of the Iranian kamikaze drones. They’ve got their own basically one to one copy of the Shahed drone that they’ve now rolled out and they’re starting to fire back at the Iranians. Because it was just like the near perfect design that they’re like:

 

“We can’t make any better than this. We’re just going to copy it.”

 

Natty: Yeah. You know, for the grand and mighty American empire is reverse engineering Third World brownoid country drones [chuckling] that sound like lawnmowers when they’re flying through the sky!

 

But yeah, that’s what America’s up to these days. I mean, you can’t really claim it’s the European heritage stock that’s like the most genius country in the world. It’s just not that anymore, I’m afraid, guys.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. But we’ve got a lot to talk about. So and we do actually have just. We do have a little sort of running order as well, tonight. I’m not going to read it out, but I was going to post it actually and say:

 

“Look, these are all the things we’ll be discussing.”

 

But there’s a lot to discuss and we’re going to go through things from the start. Now we’re going to speed run some of the bits we talked about on the Nationalist A-Team because for anyone who watched the Nationalist A-Team and enjoys it, look, it is a banger of a stream, except for when I get killed by somebody and get upset.

 

But other than that! It is a good stream. And if you want to watch it, there’s some takes there. And also there’s the Patriarch there as well who provides quite a lot of good comedy.

 

Anyway, so we’re going to start with the wider justification for this because there’s nowhere better to start than the official justification. Now, I’ve seen these videos where Netanyahu, they’re sort of like compilation videos of every time Netanyahu is claimed that Iran is sort of five months, five weeks, you know, two years from getting the atomic bomb. And he’s been doing this, believe it or not, for over 30 years!

 

So the first example I’ve seen of Netanyahu saying that Iran is just moments away from like nuclear weapon capability was actually all the way back in 1995. And the reason that’s interesting, …

 

Yuro: There are people dying in this war on the American side who have not been alive longer than Iran was supposedly two weeks away from a nuclear weapon!

 

Mark Collett: That’s a very good point. That is Yuro. But you get minus points for butting in. You’ve been told about that.

 

Natty: Oh, no [word unclear] battalion!

 

Mark Collett: Wiffle bat to give you a spanking. Right. So these fake nuclear claims that are interesting for two reasons.

 

Firstly, because they are blatantly fake! It’s been, to my knowledge, 31 years. And Yuro does make, … Look to Yuro’s credit, he makes a very good point. You know, the idea that this has been going on longer than some of the people on these American battleships have been alive is incredible!

 

But one thing that struck me immediately with this was I remember living through the time of the Iraq war. And at the time of the Iraq war, Weapons of Mass Destruction became one of the most maligned phrases to have ever been used in British Parliament, to the point that where if you now say “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, it’s sort of synonymous with war crimes, lies and a regime that took us into what was essentially an illegal war. You know, there was no Weapons of Mass Destruction.

 

But one thing that shocks me is this is the kind of thing where people just seem to have either forgotten this or put it to one side.

 

So the Daily Mail is a classic example of this. The Daily Mail is sort of the populist Right-wing, you know, vote Reform, consider voting Conservative newspaper. And they were all against Blair and the Weapons of Mass Destruction and exposing his lies and speaking out about it once it was exposed via the Chilcot inquiry.

 

But now the Daily Mail, like:

 

“We need this war. You know, usually we’re against war, but in this instance, this needs to happen!”

 

And you’ve got all these shill commenters in the sections underneath the Daily Mail articles in the comment sections, and they’re all saying things like:

 

“Oh, I’m against the war, but this is an exception.”

 

And I don’t know whether these are real people, idiot Boomer types or that’s not all Boomers. But you know, the sort. I mean the kind of person that says:

 

“Oh, well, I’m against the people on the small boats, but I would let the genuine refugees in all. Yes! And if somebody comes here and learns to speak English, well, he’s as British as Yorkshire pudding, isn’t he!”

 

Those sort. Is it one of them or is it a shill account?

 

[11:04]

 

But I think it’s really interesting that exactly the same justification for the attack is being used, as was used in Iraq. But the Iraq, War retrospectively is possibly the most maligned conflict and the conflict seen as the most unjust conflict. Probably post World War II. I’d have said that would have gone to Vietnam at one point, but Iraq seems to have, maybe because it’s more recent, seems to have eclipsed that.

 

So what do you guys think?

 

We’ll start with you, Natty. Obviously this is what they’re saying and we’re going to discuss next the real reason and what we think the real reason is. But what do you think to this sort of fake reasoning for going to war?

 

Natty: Well, just listening to you there, I haven’t done this because I was just reminded by what you said. But I’m fairly certain if you went back to the 2000s and had a look at the lead up to the Iraq war, you, amongst the Daily Mail articles, you wouldn’t find opposition to the actual war itself, because none of these publications were really opposed to it in any meaningful way and certainly weren’t like trying to rally people against the war. So you know, post Iraq war when everyone was kind of saying what disaster it was, I’m sure the Daily Mail were jumping on board that.

 

But as even now publications that you would think would be against the war in Iran are kind of talking around the edge of it whilst not decrying the war and certainly not being like anti-war, like proper anti-war publications and laying out all the connections between the Epstein regime and the people connecting in it like Mandelson and like Boris Johnson and Tony Blair and all the rest of it.

 

But yeah, it’s striking. I mean, one of the things I put in the chat earlier was that before this happened. Well, okay, let’s let me take it back a little bit. Before Iraq, the reason why the term “Weapons of Mass Destruction” became such a big thing is because the media and the government, Blair’s regime spent so much time and energy trying to get public approval for it, because they felt like, they obviously felt like they needed it. They needed a justification. They needed something to sell to the British people as to why it was a good idea, why it was necessary to go into Iraq.

 

Now that just hasn’t happened this time. Because I think they understand that the forces controlling the “Epstein Empire” as people are calling it, which is fairly apt, simply are not in the shadows anymore. You know, this stuff has been laid out. Israel is pulling the strings and it’s pulling the strings of America and it’s America’s pulling the strings of Europe because essentially Europe is just a colony of the United States. So they don’t feel they need to justify it so much.

 

Now, obviously there’s like regime mouthpieces and stoolies like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray, the Daily Mail and all the rest of it, who are now going out there and running cover and trying to make this war popular or make it so that it seems like:

 

“Well, it’s not a job any of us want to do, but it’s necessary and we need to do this for stability and peace!”

 

But I just don’t think the public are buying it. And the public for the most part didn’t buy it with Iraq, but that doesn’t stop that happening. And they’re not buying it with Iran either.

 

But there hasn’t been a groundswell of opposition to it in the same way as Iraq because they haven’t spent so long trying to justify it. And for a lot of people this just came out the blue. Not for anyone who’s kind of a properly dissident to the kind of Epstein Empire. This didn’t come out of the blue. This was fairly predictable. But probably just for your average person sitting at home and getting on with life, this kind of immediate blow up in the Middle East, where oil prices are about to skyrocket, petrol prices creeping up and we’re probably about to experience an energy crisis, just came out straight out of the blue! And the justifications, unlike Iraq, are all post hoc. They, it wasn’t a media build up to a war, it’s like a media cover plot after the war has started.

 

Yuro: What I find interesting as well is as you say, with the Iraq thing, there was a lot of build up and there was:

 

“Let’s get the UN involved, let’s condemn them, let’s build a coalition, let’s get Britain involved.”

 

But the other thing is they never said Iraq has a nuke. It was always this nebulous “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. And it’s kind of like the, well, we’re going to say that they have Weapons of Mass Destruction and that’s like we will say:

 

“Oh, actually they have chemical weapons which we’re going to classify as Weapons of Mass Destruction. And we’re going to hope that we can gin that up in people’s minds to be like, ‘Oh, they have a nuclear weapon’.”

 

And it was like:

 

“We won’t explicitly state they have a nuclear weapon. We’ll just try and make people think they have a nuclear weapon.”

 

And then there was the thing about:

 

“They can strike us in 45 minutes with their Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But now they just come out and say:

 

“They’re building a nuke!”

 

It’s not Weapons of Mass Destruction. And as you say, that’s because the term is just completely lost all validity. You know, people at the moment, they hear that, they just know it’s Iraq, War 2. But they’re not even like trying to do that lesser thing.

 

It’s kind of like what they do with racism, where you’ve got like the small definition and the big definition. The Weapons of Mass Destruction is like what they do with racism.

 

So if you’re a “racist”, it’s like you just think that different people are different and you care about your own people. Well, that’s a racist. But the moment you get labelled a racist, it’s like you’re a “supremacist who wants to murder everyone who’s not you”. Well, the Weapons of Mass Destruction is chemical weapons could be a weapon of mass destruction, but the moment you get labelled with that, all of a sudden:

 

“You’ve got nukes, you’re dangerous!”

 

[17:31]

 

Natty: Yeah. And the 45 minute claim was like, they can hit the tip of Cyprus. If they drive a Scud launcher right to the edge of the Iraqi border and fire it, they might just be able to hit Cyprus! And that was translated into British headlines as “British territory”. Yeah:

 

“They can hit us in 45 minutes! Oh my God, the sky’s falling!”

 

And the reality was, it was Scud missiles and some Sarin gas artillery shells which have a range of about 10 or 15 kilometers, which they used in Halabja [1988 against Kurds] apparently. I mean, we saw, I, we got trained on that in the CBRA regiment of what happened in Halabja with the Sarin gas shells. But that was passed into, like you said, Weapons of Mass Destruction. Very nebulous. Well, not easy to disseminate term, but very little detail and very little meaning. And you could say to people:

 

“Well, they’ve got Scud launches on trucks which can fly however many kilometers it is, and they’ve got some Sarin gas shells.”

 

But these, in terms of where the United Kingdom is and the rest of Europe, these are absolutely meaningless! And again, it was just to justify the Greater Israel Project and take out one of Israel’s enemies and destroy one of Israel’s enemies.

 

Yuro: Well, I was having to think about this before we started this stream. And I said to myself, you know:

 

“There is one state, there is a rogue state in the Middle East that has Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

 

And by that I mean a boatload of actual nuclear weapons. And they have the capability of targeting Britain, …

 

Natty: And if rumours are to be believed, then the Samson Option is a real thing and Israel is the lunatic state that has no compunction about using these things. Now, I don’t know if that’s a real thing or whether that’s just something that gets disseminated to scare everyone.

 

But you’ve got to remember the only people who have used nukes as an actual weapon of war against living targets is the Epstein Regime in the Second World War. And I don’t separate the people who are running America now from those people. I mean, it’s the same group of people.

 

Yuro: If you look at the way that they behave on the world stage, the way that they behave against the Palestinians, the way that they behave against the Iranians, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to just lash out at everyone else for “not defending them hard enough”. But according to the publicly available information, they have intercontinental ballistic missiles with a range of 11 and a half thousand kilometers, which basically means they can hit everywhere on the planet with the exception of kind of east Australia, New Zealand and some bits of South America.

 

Natty: So those parts of South America where all the Nazis fled to, so unfortunately they [chuckling] can’t touch them!

 

Yuro: The parts where Javier Milei, who’s converted to Judaism, is currently in charge.

 

Natty: Oh no!

 

Yuro: And they might also not be able to quite hit Mexico where (((Claudia Sheinbaum))) is in charge.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, dear! Well, talking about the control that jews wield, let’s talk about what we think is the real reason for this.

 

Now, I’m going to go straight out and say it. I believe the real reason for this is the Greater Israel Project. I think the Greater Israel Project is something that has gathered pace in the last few years, especially under Trump. We’ve seen the attacks on Gaza, we’ve seen the attacks on Lebanon. We’ve seen the fall of the Syrian regime, which was obviously heavily influenced by Israel, who were helping Islamic terrorists in the region. You know, the head chopper ones that we’re told are the great threat to peace and justice and decency, yet Israel is actually supporting those people!

 

And we’ve also seen Israel be involved in the fall of other regimes. Israel were famously involved. And this came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. I actually did a video on this. Israel were very famously involved with meeting, … And Tony Blair admitted this under oath in the Chilcot Inquiry. He met influential jewish leaders from the then current Israeli regime. And he said:

 

“The meetings had nothing to do with military intelligence. They had everything to do with overall strategy and long term goals.”

 

So take that as you will. But I’m taking that as they were heavily involved in getting rid of Saddam Hussein.

 

[22:24]

 

And I think it’s obviously within Israel’s interest to topple almost every sovereign regime in the region. And they do this quite openly. They are doing it more openly now. They’re getting away with it, sadly. And this is a blatant example of that. Although they’ve loosely talked about the nuke thing, like we said, Natty did make an important point that they felt it’s less necessary to sell this like they sold the Iraq, War. And in some interviews, members of the American regime have simply said:

 

“Yeah, we just want to kill these people. We want to kill them, we want to take them out. This is about regime change. This is about Israel.”

 

And I believe it was Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, who said:

 

“It was Israel who forced our hand. They began this and we are there to defend them and assist them. So when they began the attacks, we were forced into going along with it.”

 

Now, Trump then furiously denied this, but it’s a very interesting admission from Marco Rubio.

 

So I think this is all about the Greater Israel Project. And I believe that has been the driving force or the driving ideology behind the destabilisation of the Middle East.

 

Natty: Yeah, totally! And it kind of behooves me to say this and to get people to realise that whereas we’re living kind of day to day and prices of things go up and you’re worried about your children. We’ve been totally separated from any idea of our history and our lineage and where we’ve come from and where we might be going.

 

So it’s kind of hard to understand for us the jewish mindset. And this is a plan that’s been in the making for a very long time, years, decades, where once Israel was created and they have a vision of the Greater Israel Project. There’s a whole, there’s a list of countries. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt. And through various machinations, they’ve all been, one by one, they’ve been taken out or pacified. Egypt is basically paid off by the United States and is under the sway of Israel, has a border with Israel, but it doesn’t do anything about their genociding of the Palestinians and the destabilising and eventual collapse of the Syrian state. What happened in Libya with Gaddafi ending up with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street, and the subsequent flooding of Europe with migrants, which is a kind of side issue we can get onto if you want. But all of this, …

 

Mark Collett: I’ve got that further down the line, mate, that comes at the end, if you look at the show notes, I’ve actually said:

 

“You know, what are the actual repercussions for this, both for the West and for the Middle East?”

 

And that’s one of the things we will talk about.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. And it’s clear now, I mean, in my opinion and the opinion of other people who have been following this, that the reason Trump was so heavily pushed into a second term was that the people who are running him and the jews in Israel believe that he was the best chance of getting this done. You know, this final push to topple Iran, which basically gets rid of the last bastion of resistance to Israel. And you’ve got to think:

 

“Well, why is Israel so hell bent on getting rid of people who resist them?”

 

You think, well, the people who are opposing them, the only real people who are opposing them, committing genocide in Gaza, Europe was on board with it. The United States was supplying them with bombs and had carrier groups in the Mediterranean. The United Kingdom, our own government, was flying surveillance flights over Gaza and letting Cyprus be used as a refueling and an air base for Israel. So Europe was aiding in the genocide in Gaza.

 

And it was only Hezbollah and you know, funded via Iran that was really attacking, and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who were attacking Israel and trying to hold them account for genociding the Gazan people. And that’s unacceptable for Israel to have that resistance in the region, even though the attacks on it are totally justified and being used as like, defense against people who are being hurt and destroyed in this like, brutal way by this lunatic, lunatic group of people who have been squatting on the edge of a Mediterranean.

 

So the justifications the real justification is the toppling of Iran as a coherent state. And I’ll touch on this before I pass this over to Yuro. But there’s talk of regime change. You know, that’s what they say:

 

“We’re trying to enact regime change here.”

 

But that isn’t quite true. They’re not really interested in a regime swap where they swap one regime for another. What they’re interested in is total destabilisation! Just like with Syria, just like with Iraq, just like with Libya, where these are just failed states with tribal warlords with like Mossad and CIA run groups running around HTS, ISIS, all of these people. Which means no coherent defense, no missile bases, no civil defense, nothing! Just a load of groups that you can pay this group to fight this group and you know, you can pay these guys or stop paying these guys and just let chaos reign while Israel just expands and expands and expands and gets to do what it wants.

 

You know, kind of reminiscent, I’ll just finish on this. Kind of reminiscent to how if you import millions and millions of foreign people into a small island nation, it also becomes destabilised and coherent resistance or coherent defense or coherent politics kind of become very difficult and a very well motivated minority can rule the lot! So there’s your answer as to the real reasons for this war.

 

[28:45]

 

 

Yuro: A few things I wanted to pick up on there. Just as Mark was speaking, you kept using the term “regime”. And that’s like one of those MKUltra trigger words that they’ve put in people’s minds that like “regime is bad, regime is authoritarian, evil government”. It was all it was always the “Saddam regime” and the “Iran regime”. They’re just governments. They’re a different form of government. You know some of them are more or less Democratic than others, but it’s like this regime thing is a trigger word. And along that same lines, Natty, you mentioned the Houthis as “rebels”. I think the ones that we call Houthis are pretty much just the government of Yemen now. I mean, and they have pockets of what’s left of the people that they overthrew. But they’re basically just the government of Yemen. They’re not rebels anymore. They’re not a regime, they’re just that government.

 

But obviously this was all part of a plan. This is something that they’ve been going at for a very long time. They had the Project for a New American Century [PNAC] where they said we want to hit like seven countries in 10 years. And they’ve basically got all of them.

 

I mean, they wanted to get Iraq, they wanted to get Syria, they wanted to get Libya, and of course it’s neocon jews behind it all.

 

So that’s been happening for a very long time. There’s a reason why they caught a bunch of jewish Israelis dancing on 911*, already filming before the first plane went into those towers. They were dancing around, they were happy because they knew that was the excuse that they needed to start their own genocidal campaign. And it’s like dominoes falling. They get this one, then they get that one. And I mean, what happens to Libya? He, Gaddafi, gave up his weapons, chemical weapons and things like that.

 

[* 9/11: A false flag carried out by ZOG with Israel being the lead behind its planning and execution. The aim was to unleash the War OF Terror on the countries around Israel, among other aims. See See Also links below, especially the work by Christopher Bollyn.]

 

And as soon as they were gone, they were like:

 

“Right, well he’s defenseless, we can go in there and kill him now!”

 

So that’s what they proceeded to do.

 

And the other thing as well, like looking at what they’re doing to Iran, I mean, you talked about them wanting to destabilise them. As far as I understand, because they can’t really hit these military targets. They don’t know exactly where all the underground bases are and where they’re being launched from. So they’re targeting, I mean, apart from like primary schools for girls and things like that, which they do just because they’re evil and want to blow up kids when they’re not abusing kids in other ways, they’re just like targeting police stations and things like that. Just like blow up all the police stations in the country and hope it destabilises that way!

 

And of course they had this gayop a few weeks ago, maybe a month ago now, where they tried to incite some sort of terrorist uprising in Iran and that failed.

 

And obviously they wanted to coincide these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: But I was going to say that was obviously hilariously mistimed. [chuckling] Right? So they fermented this terrorist uprising and meanwhile they haven’t got all like the military assets in place to strike it. I mean, you might have a better idea of this than me, you guys, but maybe they thought in the January uprisings that they like funded all these terrorist groups to try and overthrow the government of Iran. Maybe they thought that it was still going to be going on now while they moved all these carrier groups and pulled their troops out of the Gulf oil state bases. Maybe they thought it was still going to be going on and that the Iran government was still going to be fighting these guys, but it was crushed within like a few days. Right!

 

Yuro: I have a feeling that maybe they were trying to like wait a little bit longer, but it was about to be compromised and they thought:

 

“If we don’t do it now, we miss the opportunity entirely.”

 

So they had to launch it. And they spent so long getting carriers into place to attack Iran because they’ve had these problems with the sewage system on the Gerald Ford, which obviously some people are saying that’s like a deliberate thing, that soldiers or sailors have clogged the tubes on purpose to destroy the system because they don’t want to go and die and be the next false flag. But they’ve had problems with that before. So it’s not entirely out of the realms of possibility that it is sort of coincidental to some degree.

 

But yeah, obviously that was something that delayed them. So I mean we can be glad about that because it’s meant that Iran’s not facing these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: I’m not sure. Look, I’m not a, like a military analyst or anything, but I’m not sure even if the like Epstein empire, the Epstein regime, had fermented this terrorist uprising whilst they carried out this first strike against Khomeini in a little girl’s school for some reason, whether if those two things occurred, coincided, even then, whether they’d have been able to pull off this kind of toppling of the regime. It seems like, …

 

Yuro: Regime?

 

Natty: Look, [chuckling] it’s the word everyone uses here! I can try, but I’m as susceptible to the MKUltra* terms as everyone else. Right? I’m just not sure it would have worked even if they had pulled it off at the same time.

 

[* MKUltra was a covert program run by the CIA from 1953 to 1973. Its primary goal was to explore methods of mind control and behavior modification through various means, including drugs and psychological techniques. MKUltra is widely condemned for its unethical practices, including: Lack of Consent: Many subjects were unaware they were part of experiments. Abusive Techniques: Included torture, isolation, and drugging without consent. The term MKUltra is a CIA cryptonym: “MK” is an arbitrary prefix standing for the Office of Technical Service and “Ultra” is an arbitrary word out of a dictionary used to name this project.]

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’re going to go on to that anyway, so let’s move a little bit further forward because there are other things we want to talk about.

 

Now, I think the next thing we need to talk about, we’ve placed this into context, talk about the Greater Israel Project. Now I think the next thing that’s very important is discussing the issue of these fake negotiations that America has had with the likes of Iran before all of this kicked off.

 

And they obviously had similar sort of fake negotiations with, I think it was Venezuela, didn’t they? And then they go in anyway. This is something that America started doing, you know, fake negotiations, but then we come and get you anyway.

 

[35:06]

 

Yuro: I think they had a similar thing with the, like Hezbollah and Hamas, didn’t they?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, there’s multiple examples.

 

But what I’m getting at is a real, and we won’t labour this because we spoke about this extensively on the Nationalist A-Team the other night, but when we were talking about that, we did make the point that fundamentally at one point the idea of going in somewhere you know, negotiating, but then using negotiations as a reason or as an excuse to then hit another country. So the negotiations aren’t real negotiations. They’re cover that gets the other side to drop their guard. So, it’s like walking up somebody in a bar saying:

 

“Look, mate, let’s just settle this amicably. Let me buy you a drink. What do you want?”

 

And when the other guy turns to have a look at the list of craft beers, you sucker punch him! You know, that’s an underhanded thing to do. Everyone would be like:

 

“Wow, that’s pretty much scandalous! We don’t want to see that kind of behaviour. That’s the kind of behaviour that’s not becoming of an honourable man.”

 

And there used to be this narrative that the West was honourable, that we were the good guys. And I’ll say these fake negotiations are being used as a means to cover up an attack which is I’m imminent. I do think that is a really shady thing to do.

 

And I think that as time goes by, we are going to see more and more people be unwilling to negotiate with the West. Like, why would Vladimir Putin or China or any other nation, North Korea, negotiate with Trump? Why would any foreign leader trust going to America or sitting in a negotiation room with the Americans when they assassinate leaders, carry out fake negotiations, use the hand of friendship to lock their opponent’s hand in place before they sucker punch them? You know, it’s like holding one hand out to shake the other guy’s hand and when he starts giving the handshake, you just sucker punch them! You know, it’s awful! I mean, what do you guys think to this?

 

I think this is going to fundamentally change the way, the implication of this, is going to change the way that every other nation does business with America. And it’ll put America on a even people like the Europeans, who are essentially vassal states of America, are not going to be trusting of Trump again or America.

 

Yuro: Well, Europe is already not going to be trusting of Trump and America because of the whole thing with Greenland for a start. But I mean, I hope at the end of this, obviously Iran’s going to hold out. They’re going to continue to resist until America and Israel, …

 

Mark Collett: This is the summation, what you hope for comes at the end, like, stay on, …

 

Yuro: It’s related to this! It’s related to this. I was going to say I hope that Israel and America run out of interceptor missiles. Iran fights them to a standstill. And they say:

 

“Right, we will negotiate with Trump in this place.”

 

He goes there to negotiate, and then, …

 

Natty: They just blow him up! [chuckling]

 

Yuro: And it would be entirely justified on moral grounds and on the grounds that it’s already been done to them.

 

Natty: They would cry bitter tears if the same tactics they had used, these same underhand, cowardly, sniveling, weak tactics were used on them! And this is something to point out to. I say I’m gonna use Boomer, but, like, Boomer mindset, Civnat, kind of Tommy Robinson-tard mindset where like:

 

“Oh, yeah, no, we’re the good guys and we should stamp these dirty terrorists into the ground! They’re terrorists!”

 

It’s like your pedo jew empire assassinates little girls for some reason, I guess because they’ve just got bloodlust and we can talk about the Purim Fest, if we want. Assassinates little girls, assassinates world leaders, which is supposed to be off the table. Totally violates, like, any notion of the Geneva Convention or the kind of rules of war and does it in a cowardly way. This is like your medieval knight marching out to the front of a battle under a white flag to negotiate terms and then just pulling a knife and stabbing the negotiator. Your entire army would be, they’re like, forfeit. And the enemy army would be totally justified in just slaughtering prisoners and like, just pillaging and doing whatever it wants at that stage! You’ve set the rules. You’re supposed to be the powerful, the one who’s setting out exactly how things are going to go down. And you open the conflict or the latest round of the conflict with an underhand cowardly assassination under the flag of truce and blowing up 170 schoolgirls! Well, I’m sorry, but what space have you now given for quarters? None! And no one’s going to trust you, and they shouldn’t trust you.

 

And the other world powers looking on Russia and China, who we’re going to touch on in a little while, like Mark said, they’re not going to be trustworthy. They’re going to have that in their minds anytime America tries to talk to them, anytime the jew empire reaches out to say:

 

“Oh, we just want to discuss the Ukraine war and negotiate terms in the Ukraine war.”

 

And like, Yuro said, they would be totally justified in shooting down like diplomatic planes, like bombing, like delegations, peace delegations, assassinating the head of state. Who’s to tell anyone now that that is a wrong or immoral thing to do now that supposedly the world police and a global superpower and the most moral army in the world, Israel, has carried out exactly that, such a thing.

 

And I don’t need to belabour the point, but they’ve been doing this for a long time. And you can look back as far as Dresden and the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan, to say:

 

“Well, that’s how these people act! And people who oppose them should act accordingly and plan accordingly.”

 

[41:35]

 

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. And not only this or not only what you guys have said, but I do think it’s very interesting that on top of everything you guys have said, there is also the issue of Russia and Zelensky.

 

Now obviously if Russia had wanted to, they could have bombed Kiev, day one of the conflict and absolutely just beheaded the regime. Now Russia never did that. Now I’m not saying Russia are the good guys or shilling for Russia, but it is an interesting comparison to see that everything that Russia has been accused of, the West has done and the West has done it in a much more sort of egregious fashion. It’s quite interesting.

 

And this so-called “Axis of Evil” now appears to be far less evil than the “good guys”. The “good guys” have shown, I said that in inverted commas. Have shown their hand. They’ve, it’s a mask off moment. I don’t know if anyone wants to add something to this because we did talk about this a lot, but I’ll give you the chance to follow up if anyone wants to talk about this.

 

Natty: Yeah, go on. Yuro, you go first.

 

Yuro: I was just gonna say it’s a complete moral inversion. It’s, we are supposedly the good guys because we fight against the bad guys. And they’re all terrorists. They’re inherently evil. I was listening to, I think this was on the Daily Shoah they were talking about basically the term “terrorist” is a social construction. It’s just a word we can use to label somebody and all of a sudden their grievances illegitimate. We don’t have to stick to the rules of engagement. We can just murder them, we can murder their families and put them in jail. We just put this label on them and they are inherently evil.

 

But you know, the Ayatollah was never in the Epstein files. That’s the difference.

 

Natty: Yeah, the Ayatollah never called me a goyim or demographically replaced my people or ethnically cleansed my people. So you know, what beef do I have with the Ayatollah, at this point? And like Mark was saying, the Russians opened Ukraine, the Ukraine conflict by striking out military targets. They were landing at Hostomel Airport and controlling like major supply routes. And the Jewpedo regime starts its war with an assassination of a leader, or a spiritual leader. Not a military strategist or anything like that. A spiritual leader who’s in his 80s as well as his granddaughter and his family members all blown up. And like blowing up a school with 12 to 17 year old school girls in it. Now you tell me, yeah, you tell me who the bad guys are.

 

Yuro: It’s worth pointing out as well that the entire war in Ukraine or although it was something that had been kind of slowly building up for a while, that NATO had been expanding further and further eastward, it was really brought to the fore because Russia was supporting Assad in Syria. And the Epstein empire had to take out Syria in order to stop Iranian weapons getting to Hezbollah and getting to Gaza.

 

And so they started this whole other conflict to take Russia’s focus away from helping their allies in Syria. And that allowed them to get in there and destroy Syria. And it’s all part of the same program.

 

Natty: The same grand strategy. Yeah, I think people, a lot of people kind of don’t seem to understand that. They’re like:

 

“Well that seems, that seems too far fetched that the Pedojew regime would start a war with Russia in Ukraine just to help topple the Syrian government. Or the Pedo jew regime would kidnap a South American president just to support an ongoing or like support a future war against Iran with oil, you know, oil routes and all the rest of it.”

 

Because people are like:

 

“No, that can’t be right, you know, 50,000 Ukrainian men dead and God knows how many Russian men dead just to tie up Russian forces to leave Syria exposed?”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how these people think. That’s what they’re willing to do.”

 

And that’s what they did do. And in Syria, Russian troops, Russian air power in Syria was halting Israeli aggression and you know, Western aggression. It was the CIA, it was MI6 and was Mossad, was paying ISIS, which has now become HTS, which is basically ISIS, to mess up Syria and mess with Assad and sanctions on Assad’s government that was turning the place inhospitable. Making it so that just to live there was pain and it wasn’t the government was obviously suffering and trying its best, but the people suffer when you put sanctions on a country. So on behest of like jewish paedophiles and Israel, America just makes people’s lives a misery around the world, everywhere! You know, Ukrainian men dead, Syrian families wiped out, little girls in Iran, hundreds of thousands of civilians everywhere, in Iraq, in Gaza, in Libya, all dead! Because jewish paedophiles just cannot get enough blood.

 

Yuro: And until the extent that they have any support for the Israeli regime in places like the UK, people in the UK who support Israel, they see this as a war against the Muslims. And they hate Muslims because of what gangs of Pakistani men do to White girls after jewish people like Peter Mandelson and his friend Tony Blair, people like that brought them to our country.

 

And it works for them both ways because it destroys the youth of the British people. It destroys our homogeneous country. It creates resentment against Muslims which they can then use and say:

 

“Well, don’t you hate the Muslims, you hate the Pakistanis who are raping children over here!”

 

[48:08]

 

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“Live vicariously as we bomb them in the Middle East. Oh, we’re getting those dirty Muslims for you know, goyim! Don’t worry, we’re bombing them. You love it, don’t you? Rah, rah, ra! Let’s go Israel! Israel’s defending you! If we weren’t fighting them here, you’d be fighting them in your streets!”

 

Well, how? Okay, thanks, Schlomo. How did they get onto my streets in the first place? Anyone fancy answer that, answering that question?

 

Mark Collett: No, that’s a very good point. Now obviously we discussed that.

 

So when we discussed the Ayatollah being killed, we’ve discussed the schoolgirls being killed. I mean, know, as you said, the paedophiles are now murdering children. And this says something about America and Israel.

 

Now, I don’t think this was an accident. I don’t think that school being hit was in any way an accident. I think they did that on purpose. I think that’s the sort of people that they are. I think they do things like this because it pleases them to do things like this. And it pleases them to do things like this because to them this is they could avoided doing this, but they don’t want to avoid doing this. What they want to do is they want to cause as much hurt and pain as possible. Now these missile systems that they have, they are probably the best missile systems in the world. They understand where they can strike and where they can’t strike. Those missiles are pretty damn accurate.

 

So when they hit a school, I think that’s by some sort of sick design. I don’t believe it’s accidental. I don’t know if you guys want to add anything to that.

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a term called “sub-metre accuracy” and I think Tomahawk missiles, I’m not sure about JDAMs, but certainly Tomahawk missiles and the types of missiles that the Jewpedo regime uses all have sub-metre accuracy.

 

So the claims about:

 

“Well, this girl school was next to a Iranian military base or something.”

 

These munitions have sub-metre accuracy, which means they can target within a metre, which is where they drop these bombs. I mean, are we supposed to pretend that the Pedojew regime is somehow like squeamish about blowing up children and civilians? A regime that goes out of its way to target hospitals and suburbs and then when it’s blown up the hospitals and suburbs, then blows up the tent cities that spring up around it to house all the refugees and injured people that you’ve just like totally displaced.

 

So these people are not squeamish about killing civilians then. They never have been. They never have been. Not for the last 70 years and probably not before that.

 

Yuro: We’re always told that we have the most advanced, precise, ultra accurate munitions. We can take out a terrorist in a crowd without killing anyone else:

 

“Oh, look, we dropped a bomb dead centre on that school. Total accident! We don’t know how it happened!”

 

Do you remember when they were attacking Gaza? I mean they’re always attacking Gaza, but in particular in the aftermath of October 7th and there were various organisations that went there to try to provide food relief and they had a car with a big logo on the top that says, “Food Kitchen”. It’s a non-governmental organisation, it’s a charity that’s bringing food to starving people in Gaza. And they sent a munition. It’s like a missile, but instead of a bomb, it’s got just like razor blades all around it.

 

And you can see the picture of the car, they sent it straight through the roof, directly on top of the driver’s seat and cut that man to bits! That’s how accurate they can be when they want to be. So they have the ability to do that they have the ability to do it. It is not an accident when they, …

 

Natty: The other interesting thing about the strike on the girls school was in the immediate aftermath, like there were shills online, there were online shills and righttoids and jews and all sorts of like scum coming out the woodwork claiming again, like they used to do in Gaza or like they have done in Gaza, that:

 

“Oh, this was an Iranian missile that kind of missed a target or misfired as they fired it out of Tehran and fell back on the girl school.”

 

Which was utterly disproved! And yet, you know, none of the people who were claiming this was like an Iranian misfire will ever be held to account or ever be made to apologise or made to like confront their lies about what this was. So the misinformation is hot and heavy.

 

But if you think, like I said, I’m going to reiterate this, if you think the Pedojew regime is squeamish about blowing up children, you’re mistaken. They’re not squeamish about blowing them up. Probably the only disappointing thing for the Pedojew regime is that these girls were blown up and didn’t have a chance to be like, sent off to Epstein’s island or something like that.

 

[53:08]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. The next thing is, this is quite interesting because it’s not the first time that Israel have admitted to bombing civilian populations. And we’ve discussed that they did it in Lebanon. They do it quite indiscriminately, they do it in Gaza.

 

But one thing’s quite interesting about these particular bombings and you guys made the point that they were bombing police stations. And I think they believe that they bombed police stations and took out government leaders and spiritual leaders, that there was going to be a revolution. And we’ve constantly heard this nonsense in the West, haven’t we? That the Iranian regime is hideously unpopular, that normal people in Iran hate the Ayatollah, they hate the government, the police, every organ of the state. I’d actually say more people in Britain hate Keir Starmer than people in Iran hate the Ayatollah.

 

But one thing that’s been very interesting is post these strikes and these indiscriminate missile attacks on schools, police stations and other sites around Tehran, we’ve seen more people out in the street supporting the Iranian government and wanting to fight back against America. I think that really underlines the fact that this idea that the Iranian people are all kept down, they have the Ayatollah’s boot on their head, this is nothing more than propaganda.

 

Natty: Oh, of course! It’s quite interesting to juxtapose it.

 

Can you imagine like a protest, or a march with hundreds of thousands of people ever coming out for any European government? I mean, the closest you got in the West was Trump, right? And that is quickly turned to ash in a lot of people’s mouths. He’s been exposed as basically just another neocon.

 

But if you put yourself in the shoes of like an Iranian, a normal Iranian citizen who’s just watched every single country where his kind of ethnic people, I know that Persians are maybe looked at differently than other people are on the Gulf states, whatever. All the other countries around him who aren’t in league with Israel have been like, brutally broken up and just left as failed states. Well, you’re going to want to cling to anything that stands up to these people and anything that resists being destroyed by them, because you know that if your government falls, that’s the end of any semblance of stability or normality you’ve got. You’re just going to have to either flee or deal with a failed state of a nation. So, of course they support it!

 

And you listen to like the BBC or Piers Morgan or some of these shows and you would think that, …

 

Mark Collett: Andrew Neil!

 

Natty: Yeah, he’s the worst! He’s a total Zio boot licker, man! I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen! [LOL] But like, you listen to these people and you’d think that every single person in Iran is just waiting, crouched behind their door, ready to rise up and take out this hugely unpopular government that everyone hates.

 

And like you said, there’s no government in Europe or anywhere in the West that is as popular with its people as the Iranian government. So take that as you will.

 

Yuro: Obviously, you know, Iran, I mean, I’m guessing, but much like most of the Middle East is awash with weapons from previous gayops and plans that we’ve had to overthrow them in the past.

 

But if you turn this around and let’s say some foreign actor blew up Parliament with every MP in it and blew up every diversity police station across the country and just dropped a bunch of weapons the chance of having a revolution would be much more likely here than it ever would be over there!

 

Natty: Yeah. And just to add on to this point, funnily enough, the strikes on Bahrain, and Bahrain’s a tiny little island nation. I mean, it used to be part of Iran. But the strikes on Bahrain look like they might actually foment a revolution because they’re kind of the Pedojew empire installed monarchy in Bahrain has lost its grip thanks to the Americans retreating and the actual people in Bahrain absolutely hate their rulers. And possibly, you know, news blackout and all the rest of it might actually foment a popular revolution in Bahrain and change governments there, [chuckling] which is supposed to be like a stronghold for the American empire and the Epstein regime and the headquarters of the Fifth Fleet, which controls the Persian Gulf or it used to control the Persian Gulf until the Pedojew regime started this war. So yeah, good one, guys. How’s it going? How’s this war going for you?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I would say that you’ve got a very good point there. And it’s a good point because we are moving on to how is this war going? Well, this is the interesting thing. Trump was elected as the guy who was going to be the President of peace and he was also elected on this America First ticket.

 

The idea that he was going to look after the average American. Now since Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, we’ve seen sort of panic buying. Oil prices have spiked. This is something that isn’t helping normal Americans who are already struggling with Trump’s idiotic tariffs.

 

And I would say, for Trump, when you actually look at, you say, how’s it going for him personally? It’s not going well domestically, but his approval ratings are at an all time low. They’re actually beneath his previous approval ratings for his first term and actually beneath Biden’s approval ratings. Now he’s getting savaged.

 

Now obviously he’s going out on TV:

 

“Oh, none of these mean anything. This is rubbish! The people love me!”

 

And I’ve spoken about this before. Post World War II don’t think any Western leader has built a cult of personality as intense as Trump has done with the MAGA movement. Trump has truly built a cult of personality where people see him as the supreme leader.

 

But I think that can be a good thing and it can be a bad thing! It’s a good thing because you have a dedicated support base. It’s a bad thing because often you become insulated and you only listen to that dedicated support base. And because you have that insulation, because you have that ring of people cheering you on and like:

 

“Up Trump! Yeah, you’re doing it right! You’re getting it right! Donald’s got it perfect! Bomb them all!”

 

You don’t actually hear the people outside of your immediate circle. And I think Trump has got this wrong. I think this is going to bring more misery on normal Americans. And I also think it could cost the Republicans the midterm.

 

[1:00:51]

 

 

Yuro: I don’t think Trump got this wrong. I think Trump did this because his handlers wanted him to do this. I mean, was it Marco Rubio who basically came out and said Israel told us they were going to attack and when they attacked, we were going to get hit in response, so we just had to join them, basically, the tail wags the dog. We had to join in. They forced our hand.

 

And of course, Trump’s all over the Epstein files. He’s part of the Epstein class. He is part of that jewish Zionist Occupied Government [ZOG]. He’s not doing it because he thinks it’s going to make him popular. He’s doing it because he is either severely compromised or that’s just his team.

 

Natty: Yeah. And to assume that Trump cares anymore, I mean, he’s not up for a third term. And if he doesn’t care, do you think the jews who are running him and the Epstein, whoever takes over from Epstein cares about Trump’s reputation or cares even less about the American people and what they want? They were just dupes who were fooled into voting for him. And you can say:

 

“Well, the 2016 Trump train.”

 

Which was a lot more based and had a lot more kind of like groundswell, Right-wing energy behind it. Well:

 

“They were tricked as well. Right?”

 

But if you fell for it again and voted for him this time, they really must despise you and just think you’re the most stupid person ever going! And it’s been proven right. I mean, Trump has now burned any credibility he’s had. This is an extremely unpopular war, but it doesn’t matter. His reputation isn’t on the line anymore, and it’s not a consideration for the people pulling his strings. They wanted this war done. Trump was their best shot of getting it done. And so they’ve got him to enact it.

 

And what we’re seeing is the fallout. And who knows where this ends? I’m sure we’re going to move on to that point. But the suffering of the American people, the suffering of European people is not any concern to these people! And you might argue that European suffering and American suffering is just a little bit of icing on their cake.

 

Yuro: This is something that they’ve wanted for decades and they’ve realised that as time’s gone on its getting less and less possible. So they’ve done it now because now is more likely than tomorrow as bad as it is and as badly as they’re doing and not winning what they want to be. If they’d waited longer, they would have had even less chance.

 

So it’s just like it’s do or die. It’s all out now because they’ve got no other choice.

 

Natty: Right. That’s what I totally agree with that.

 

And what I’m saying is the considerations that like a rational government that cared about its people would make, and there’s going to be an energy crisis, our people are going to die in this war. It’s hugely unpopular. This doesn’t benefit us in the slightest. None of that is like, none of that is in consideration. And it’s clear when you listen to people that they don’t quite understand that. And you listen to like the media class trying to justify this war and just grasping for anything.

 

Whereas like the reality, the truth, that this is purely for Israel and purely for the pedojew empire just doesn’t, it’s quite a hard pill to swallow.

 

Yuro: And as always, it’s going to affect Europe and it’s going to affect the UK so much worse than it’s going to affect America, because America has its own energy supplies.

 

Whereas, you know, Europe has been deliberately cut off from Russian energy supplies and made to not take fuel from Iran in the first place. And so Europeans are probably going to freeze this winter because of what the Americans have done or the jewish-American empire has done. Yeah.

 

Natty: Not content with cutting off via like a jewishpedo regime war with Russia. Not content with cutting off like the majority of European energy supplies. Now [chuckling] the pedojew empire now starts another war in the Gulf, which will just totally screw energy prices. And I like you guys know this, but I’m in the middle of, I’ve almost finished building my house and part of that was installing a heating system and we’ve got like a central heating system.

 

Yuro: Didn’t install a heat pump, did you?

 

Natty: We did not install a heat pump. We installed a central heating oil boiler which we needed to run up as like commissioning the system [chuckling] and like we went to fill it up the day after this started and the price of central heating oil was like 63 per litre. And the day after this thing started and Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, it went up by like 33 P per litre and it’s now at like 1 pound 33 a litre. So I know this isn’t funny because this is going to affect everyone, but it’s like these are real effects and no the people who started this war just don’t care about this. You haven’t felt this at the pumps yet, but my God, like you are going to and the whole of Europe is going to, so.

 

[1:06:19]

 

Yuro: And it will be White pensioners who freeze whilst illegal migrants can turn up the heating as much as they want in hotels and non-Whites all over will get preferential benefits and help to make sure that they’re looked after while our people suffer.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean that’s a given at this point.

 

But yeah, we’re about to be hit with this thing. I mean, unless it wraps up quickly, which is not going to happen.

 

Yuro: Even if it did wrap up tomorrow, we’d still have the price shocks. I mean this is what always happens when there’s a, like the price of oil shoots up, petrol prices shoot up, the price, …

 

Natty: Two days for it to rise. 106. Yeah, six weeks for it to creep its way back down. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: They’re very interesting points and obviously it sort of goes into what we said before about Venezuela. It puts everything into context.

 

Now one of the things that he’s really. We’re going to talk a bit about the fight back here and what Iran has done, its retaliatory strikes, but one of the most disappointing things is they talk about this Axis of Evil, but so far Russia have condemned this. I’m not sure what China have said, if anything at all, but there’s largely a wave of silence about this, isn’t there? There isn’t sort of the international, … So when Russia started their, in inverted commas. They’re not my words, but their words, “the Special Military Operation”, you know, there was this wave of condemnation from every European country about the invasion of Ukraine.

 

However, here, this so-called “Axis of Evil”, China, Russia, etc, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of pushback other than a couple of snappy press statements.

 

And I think this does tell you something about Russia and China’s ability or readiness to get involved. Now I would say China is more concerned with potentially taking Taiwan. And the knock on effects of this is, well, China will look and say:

 

“If America can take out the leadership of countries they don’t like, why can’t we do the same to Taiwan?”

 

And I think Russia is still tied up in Ukraine, which is probably by design. I think part of the issue with Ukraine was pulling Russia so deep into Ukraine that it depleted their resources in places like Syria. So regimes did fall in areas that America wanted them, America and Israel wanted them to fall.

 

But what do you think about the lack of sort of international pushback on this?

 

Yuro: It’s obvious that the Chinese and Russians are helping the Iranians in terms of intelligence gathering, satellite imagery. Supposedly the Iranian missiles use like an encrypted Chinese GPS as opposed to the American run satellites.

 

But yeah, they’re not coming out and publicly saying a lot and they could be doing a lot more kind of out in the open. And if they were really serious, the Chinese and Russians could help the Iranians develop an actual nuclear weapon to allow them to have a deterrent to defend themselves. And that could have happened, you know, within the last decade, but we don’t see them doing it.

 

Natty: Well, I made this point to mark the other day. This is where I kind of disagree with you a little bit. I think there’s only so much they can do. And Russia can’t just import a nuke into Tehran or into Iran without them asking for it. And if you’ve been paying attention, …

 

Yuro: Well, they should ask for it then!

 

Natty: Well that’s, maybe you’re right and they probably should and they probably will if they ever, if they get through this thing in one piece. But Russia has to be asked to provide that nuke. And the Ayatollah, Ayatollah Khomeini has famously had a fatwa on acquiring nuclear weapons. Which, you know, looking back to how we opened this thing puts lie to the fact that:

 

“Iran is two weeks away from having a nuke. Iran is five weeks away from having a nuke!”

 

For the last 30 years, every couple of weeks. So for one, Iran has to ask these countries for things. And I’m fairly certain that Russia is providing military assistance. You know, maybe not flashy supersonic missiles and all the rest of it, but you know it’s a short hop across the Caspian Sea for Russia to send boats and send equipment down to Tehran as much as it can. Like you said, Mark, they’re tied up in Ukraine as per the pedojew regime’s plan.

 

And like you said, Yuro. They’re using encrypted Chinese satellite data for their missiles. And I’m sure, like satellite imagery of the surrounding Gulf states and areas that Iranian like ballistic missiles and drones are hitting is provided by the Chinese.

 

So I think Russia and China understand the stakes here and understand that if Iran falls or we’re kind of at a turning point in history of the future of the Pedojew regime empire and where it stands and if it manages to pull this off and destroy Iran, then who knows what’s next? And we, I guess, we can talk about that. But for Russia and China, they probably think that actually halting the Pedojew regime here is probably a good thing to do.

 

And as much as much as they can do under the table, they’re going to do. And if it gets any hotter than that, well, who knows? But I disagree with you that they’re not helping as much as they could be.

 

Yuro: I don’t expect them to hand over a dozen nuclear weapons and say:

 

“Here you go!”

 

But why is Iran using such an antiquated air force instead of more modern Russian fighter planes, for example? Like, things like that would not be outside of the realm of possibility.

 

[1:12:38]

 

Natty: Well, because that’s not where the Iranian like, national defense has been focused. America, whatever you like to say about it, dominates the air and it always has. It has the most advanced and the most aeroplanes that it can put in the sky. You know, carrier groups all over the place, air bases all over the place. And Iran has had a long time to prepare for this. They’ve watched what’s happened around them and has decided actually our best national defense is in this missile capability and drone capability. And if Russia sent a squadron of like Su-22s or whatever the latest MIGs are, they would probably be shot down in fairly short order, which would be waste of resources.

 

So I think this idea, like I said, I think this idea that they’re not helping as much as they can is misplaced.

 

And interestingly enough, Arab Natsoc in the chat has just said Iran has a hyper fixation on self sufficiency. And he says it’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

 

And I think that’s probably correct. Like I said it’s not up to China and Russia just to unload the docks in some port somewhere. Just tons and tons of military hardware that Iran never asked for. You know, they’ve got to agree these things and they’ve got to ask for it and they’ve got to trade for it and give things away and they probably feel they don’t need to. And judging by what’s happening so far, maybe they’re right. They didn’t need it. Maybe whatever they’ve asked for, they’re utilising and anything they haven’t asked for, they don’t really need.

 

Yuro: [with a Russian accent]

 

“I’m sorry, comrade, I didn’t mean to leave that pallet of nuclear weapons. You can do what you like with them.”

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, [chuckling] I did say this in all fairness, mate, I think I did say to you it would probably, to do something like this or to create a deal of that sort you would probably actually need for the Iranian regime to fundamentally turn around and say:

 

“Look, you’re gonna have half of our country, you’re gonna have X amount of our oil production. You’re going to be able to put your own bases on our soil. You’re going to have this power over us.”

 

And then Russia or China might say:

 

“Well, this is actually worth it. Then we will put bases on your soil. This is absolutely worth it! We’re going for it. Thanks. Thanks a bunch, guys. You know, this works.”

 

But the Iranians might not actually want that they might not actually want Russia and China to have that much control over Iranian politics.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s absolutely right!

 

And if you think about it, that would turn Iran into a, like a, not exactly a vassal state, but as a, like an arm of Russia or an arm of China.

 

Whereas if they come out of this unscathed, they emerge as the regional power in the Middle East, which has much bigger implications for them and then makes them bigger on the world stage than just being an outpost of Russia or China.

 

Yuro: But they could trade on more equal terms with the North Koreans. And the North Koreans have come out and said:

 

“If they ask for a nuke, they’ll get one.”

 

Natty: Well maybe they will. I suspect the Iranian government is going to be much more looking at that idea much more favourably after this.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that is an interesting point.

 

And ultimately I’ve said this on many streams, but we are in a situation where that is the only way that you can keep America off your back. That’s the only reason North Korea didn’t fall. It’s the only reason Russia probably hasn’t been invaded or struck by the Americans. I think if Russia didn’t have nukes, undoubtedly America would have attacked them.

 

But despite them not having nukes, I will say this. I think the Iranians retaliatory strikes have been extremely impressive! But amongst those retaliatory strikes, it is noted that, because when this all started, I was thinking:

 

“Why are they bombing refineries? Why are they attacking refineries in other Arab nations? Surely that’s going to annoy potential allies. Why would they do such a thing? You know, we don’t do that, guys, because if you do, you’re going to end up being a pariah state and you know, your next door neighbours aren’t going to want to essentially work with you.”

 

And then the other day it comes out that effectively what you’re seeing here is not Iran striking these oil refineries, but the strikes on the oil refineries have been carried out by Israel!

 

So what do you think to Iran’s actual retaliation and what do you think of Israel’s rather underhanded attacks? Because, and this isn’t just theory crafting. We’ve actually seen over the last, 24 hours scores of Mossad agents being arrested around the Middle East for being involved in false flag operations in numerous Middle Eastern nations.

 

And of course, this is something that we all know happens. This is something that we all are completely aware of you know, we know that Israel is regularly involved in sort of false flag events. This is something that has happened many, many times in the past.

 

And I think it’s interesting that this is being exposed. So we’ve had the USS Liberty, [we’ve had 9/11] we’ve had bombings in the Middle East. We’ve had potential or we’ve had sort of “terror attacks” in inverted commas in numerous countries which have turned out to be the work of Israeli agents. And we’re seeing that again now.

 

So I think Iran has performed far more ably than people might have thought. Sadly, they don’t seem to be winning this. Their navy seems to be taking major hits.

 

But some of these retaliatory strikes are looking questionable, are actually the work of Israel.

 

[1:19:06]

 

 

Yuro: Well, supposedly, I mean, who’s to say that the attack on our base in Cyprus was actually carried out by Iran? Because didn’t Keir Starmer say:

 

“Oh, we won’t actually engage in hostile actions, we’ll only defend Israel with our planes!”

 

Which is, of course, kind of a schizophrenic point of view in the first place. But then all of a sudden:

 

“Oh, look, our base in Cyprus is attacked and now we can kind of get in fully without restriction.”

 

Natty: So that’s a good point. I mean, we can talk about RAF Akrotiri, but if you look at where Cyprus is on a map, any Iranian weapons, munitions, whether it’s drones or missiles or whatever, have to fly over, like directly over Israel. So there’s speculation it was like Hezbollah or possibly someone else or even maybe a, like an Israeli false flag, which is certainly possible. And who can say?

 

But it does seem like the refineries in Saudi Arabia and Qatar are Mossad operations to blow them up. With the point being to try and engage those countries on behalf of Israel to come into the war on behalf of Israel and do what they can or do more for Israel.

 

But coming back to your point, Mark, about the strikes that Iran have carried out, it’s not clear to me that they’re losing. I mean, you say it seems they’re losing. I’m not sure that’s totally true. And we spoke about this before I think a few months back on the Nationalist A-Team, where I think they’re doing much more, they’re doing a much more capable job than anyone except expected them to in the sensibility and where they’re striking.

 

So they’re hitting US bases in these Gulf oil states, you know, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And they’re forcing the Americans to retreat, which stretches their logistic lines. And like we said earlier, they may have fomented an uprising in Bahrain and they’re making these Arab states which have been paid off or controlled by Israel in some way unstable and shaky. And the Israeli installed governments and monarchs and regimes in these countries are looking incredibly shaky or shaky as you’ve just put in the chat, that you’re on shaky ground. And hitting Dubai, well, that’s just popular with everyone in the entire world. So what do you say about that?

 

Yuro: It’s kind of, it’s almost like their own kind of Samson Option, except inherently justified and not evil because they’re only going after the American bases and the people supporting the Americans and the Israelis.

 

But you know, they’ve said:

 

“If we’re attacked from here. We’re going to take this, and just kind of everything in the region, every American base.”

 

And it’s entirely justified because these countries can’t claim to be not involved:

 

“Oh yes, we’re not involved in this. We just have a base where your enemy is launching attacks on you, but we’re not involved!”

 

And then the moment Iran says:

 

“Okay, well we’re not going to attack you, we’re not going to attack your people, but we’ll take out that base.”

 

And then say Saudi Arabia:

 

“So we’re under attack, we’re being attacked.”

 

Well, no!

 

Natty: That’s American soil. That’s American soil there buddy! A totally legitimate target by anyone’s standards.

 

Yuro: I mean, it seems like Iran is taking a kind of “tank and turtle” strategy. You know, it’s like when you play a, like a strategy game and you can put a lot into units or you can just build up your base and wait for them to come to you. And it can be risky because there’s a possibility that you get overwhelmed.

 

But if you’re turtle enough you can withstand that storm and then you can turn around.

 

Mark Collett: Is Yuro the tank or the turtle? That’s the question. [chuckling]

 

Natty: Depends what he’s had to eat. [chuckling]

 

Yuro: Turtling and tanking, kind of the same thing.

 

Natty: But I think like Iran by its like geography is kind of is able to naturally turtle and the fact is that there’s so many assets that America have placed around it and like the jewpedo regime have around it. And the fact that Israel is within striking distance means it can strike effectively. And America is very powerful and has a very powerful military, but that military still has logistical concerns and still has aircraft carriers that are clogged [chuckling] with like fat Mexican sailors poo!

 

Yuro: American aircraft carriers are as full of shit as Donald Trump!

 

Natty: Well, [chuckling] yeah, agreed.

 

Mark Collett: Well that’s the thing. Look, I mean, we haven’t seen an aircraft carrier at the bottom of the Persian Gulf yet, have we? Now you might be saying:

 

“Oh well, Mark, that’s a big ask.”

 

Because Obviously, if that happened, we would actually probably see the beginning of World War III! Because at that point, I think Trump would have to put boots on the ground. It actually might be the end of him. You know, it’d be one of the other, wouldn’t it? He’d either have to put boots on the ground or it’d be the end of him. But we are yet to see an aircraft carrier effectively being scrapped.

 

Now, that doesn’t mean they’re not doing anything in retaliation, but they’re not hitting the big targets. And look, we’ve had American commentators, some of these American commentators that do these sort of big takes on these things. You hear them talking about this Axis of Resistance and saying:

 

“Oh the time will come when these hypersonic missiles are going to be putting aircraft carriers at the bottom of the Persian Gulf!”

 

We yet to see that, are we? I mean, we’re also yet to see any of these sort of hypersonic super weapons take out leading members of the Israeli government or the Israeli regime. You know, I know Yuro doesn’t like the word “regime”, which we keep using, but that is an interesting point. We haven’t seen Israel struck. Israel has been proved to be not invincible, I think it’s fair to say that. But we haven’t seen the Israeli government reeling in the same way that the Iranian government has.

 

[1:25:49]

 

Yuro: Well, there’s a couple of points to make here. First off, with regards to the aircraft carriers, the American Navy has been keeping the aircraft carriers at a much greater range than they would normally use them to attack somebody because they are scared of those missiles. And the Iranians have launched small salvos of kind of like four missiles at time at them and got them to basically back off and back off to a greater distance, which means they can do much fewer kind of bombing runs at once and they have more fuel requirements and greater maintenance on the planes. So it is diminishing America’s capability to attack.

 

There was also satellite footage, I think, from a Chinese satellite that showed a fire on one of the destroyers in one of the aircraft carriers escorts. So potentially that was hit by Iranian missiles and although not sunk, caught fire. So they’re keeping them at bay. The Americans know if they get any closer, they will be hit.

 

And with regards to the missiles that they’re firing, it seems like they’ve used a lot of their kind of crappier munitions and their older munitions, like everything they’ve been launching at the other Gulf states is short range ballistic missiles that don’t have the range to go anywhere else. So they might as well use them on these targets. And they’ve been using up these older, less advanced munitions and drones and still still getting so many interceptors wasted before they actually bring out the big guns. And we’ve seen within the past day or two they’re starting to launch these missiles. I can’t remember the name of them, but they’re like a very large cluster munition that drops about 60 different submunitions on the way down and they’re dropping those on Israel.

 

And as I said in the very beginning, we just don’t know how much is actually getting through and how much damage they’re actually doing because it’s censored and covered up.

 

Natty: Yeah, we did touch on this and like you said, like an interceptor system, like a THAAD or like a Patriot battery or whatever, costs like in the millions, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars. And they’re being used up [chuckling] like drones with lawnmower engines and like a few kilogram warheads. And Iran’s just like churning these things out, like churning them out and churning them out and they’re still intact and they’re at some point America is going to run out of interceptors.

 

And I don’t know if you saw this, but the pedojew regime in America like called its defense manufacturers, heads of its defense manufacturing industry in for like an emergency meeting to say:

 

“We need more missiles! We need more stuff like come on, make it happen!”

 

But I was listening to something earlier saying this is very well demanding that, but there’s a lot of a very expensive gear that goes into this stuff, like certain gases and certain rare earth elements and guidance systems and radio radar systems and optics and all the rest of it that has to go into this missile production.

 

Meanwhile, you know, Iran can get like a cheap [chuckling] Chinese lawnmower engine, stick it in a, like a fiberglass Shahed drone shell, put a bit of explosive on the tip of it and just launch it wherever it runs, you know, within a few hundred mile radius, which is enough to cover the Gulf states and Strait of Hormuz and all this oil production that Europe relies on and lots of other people rely on and it’s going to destabilise all these countries that surround it.

 

Yuro: There’s a psychological aspect of them just doing the drip, drip, drip, dropping wave after wave of missiles on the Israelis, that’s definitely going to be wearing the Israelis down.

 

And also let’s say they absolutely opened up and dropped every missile that they had on Tel Aviv and the surrounding areas. Well in that situation the Israelis would come out and enact the Samson Option, wouldn’t they? And just you know, destroy them with their own nuclear weapons so that obviously they’re not going to feel like they can just drop everything on them at once because they don’t want to force them into that corner where they say:

 

“All right, well we’re doomed anyway!”

 

Natty: Well the other thing to remember is for Iran, the people in Iran and the government in Iran understands this is like a fight for survival. Like I said earlier, if they lose now, if they fail in this defense of their nation, they turn into a failed state. Israel has free reign and MI6 and the CIA have free reign to just fund all sorts of horrible like disgusting groups like ISIS and like the Kurds and everyone else to come and storm their country and make it into a living hellhole, just like they’ve done with Syria and Iraq and Libya.

 

So they understand this is a fight for their survival. So they’ve got to bend their entire will to doing this. Israel and America can stop anytime and can be forced to their knees if their civilian populations demand it. You know dropping cluster munitions on Tel Aviv is like a terror tactic. Well I mean “terror” in like air quotes, right? But at some point the Israeli people, the jews in Israel were going to have had enough of air raid sirens and cluster munitions raining on their heads and could be going to demand that it ends one way or another.

 

And this is what happened in the 12 Day War. I mean if you listen to shills and like pedojew media you would think that Iran lost a 12 day war, but it was Israel who cried off, who’d taken enough punishment from everything I can see. And it’s only a matter of time. I mean if Iran can sustain what it’s doing the Iron Dome is not stopping a giant like cluster warhead that like you said drops 60 submunitions on the city in a suburb somewhere, they’re going to cry uncle and they’re going to bend the knee to Iran.

 

[1:32:14]

 

Meanwhile Iran can’t stop and it simply can’t otherwise it fails. And I’m sure almost everyone in the country understands that.

 

Yuro: This is like a boxing match where the other side controls the bell. You know, you’ve got Mike Tyson there and he’s got the bell. He chooses when the match ends. You don’t want to give it everything you’ve got and gas out too early because it might go on another five minutes.

 

So they are happy to let this draw out. And everything that the Americans and the Israelis has done has all been about, let’s go in there with the alpha strike, let’s drop as much on them as we can, let’s take out this, let’s take out that, and then we’ll just walk away and say:

 

“Mission successful, we can walk away now.”

 

And the Iranians are like:

 

“No, we’re not surrendering! We’re going to keep on fighting!”

 

Because as time continues it gets more and more in their favour. What they don’t want to do is say:

 

“Right let’s have a ceasefire!”

 

And three months, six months down the line, it starts all over again. They’re better off just continuing it now.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree with that.

 

I mean, this is, like I said, this is a long, long time in the making. This is a long term plan of Israel’s to destroy and destabilise Iran. So if there’s ever, if there’s a ceasefire, if this stops, it’s going to be back on again at some point. And in the same way that a Gaza ceasefire isn’t really a ceasefire and at some point Israel is going to move on Gaza again and try and wipe those people out. So I think the Iranians understand that. Well, hopefully they understand that.

 

So we’ll see what happens.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is interesting because they haven’t begged, have they haven’t begged and they haven’t cucked! I think they know there is no negotiations. That’s one of the big problems earlier that we talked about though. You know, when you make it so negotiation is meaningless, you essentially do put people with their backs to the wall. You know, if you’ve got a guy, you know, stood in his house with a pistol and the police are like:

 

“Look, let’s negotiate.”

 

But you know that when the police come through that door, they’re going to shoot you no matter what. At that point, what are you going to do? Is it going to be fight to the death, blaze of glory time, or is it going to be:

 

“Well, I’ll spend 12 hours negotiating only to be shot in the head anyway.”

 

At that point, you are creating an interesting sort of situation where fundamentally the American word is good for nothing! And the only answer is to fight to the death. And look, you know, without going into World War II, many, many Germans surrendered in good faith, believing that they were going to be treated like human beings, that they were going to be treated honourably, that surrendering to the Americans would be the right thing, that they would go home, that they would be treated as prisoners of war. And then they were brutalised and starved to death. I mean, surrendering to America is often, …

 

Natty: Or sent to Russia as slaves.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Natty: Even starved on the banks of the Rhine or sent to Russia as slaves. Yeah, you shouldn’t imagine that you’re going to be treated fairly if you surrender to these people. They’ve shown, as we discussed earlier, they’ve shown that they’ve got no honour. They’ve shown that they’re dishonourable people and they don’t treat civilians well. Those are the lessons that should be taken from this.

 

Yuro: They protest for their right to rape captives. When their own people have been caught on video, you know, sodomizing prisoners like Gazans that they’ve captured, they protest. And they don’t say it didn’t happen

 

Natty: Out in the street.

 

Yuro: Yeah, they said they turn out in the street to protest and say:

 

“We should be allowed to sodomize them!”

 

Is there any other country in the world where you would get that?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think one of the interesting things about Trump, and this is sort of just one of my sort of notes on this, is that Trump came in as this “art of the deal”, wanting to put world peace on the table, get America out of the foreign wars that have dogged it for some time. And essentially what we’ve actually seen is quite the opposite. Trump actually does seem to be. And this isn’t meant to be a compliment, by the way, but it probably comes off as a little bit of a compliment. But he does seem to be sort of the ultimate ZOG warlord, doesn’t he? Trump as a guy, as a mad sort of emperor stood, you know, addressing his troops does seem to be a role that he slips into far more easily and readily than the role of peacemaker.

 

Now, I’ve seen him in these interviews. I’ve seen him talking about future operations. I’ve seen the way he really does love having this power and being able to tell other nations to bow to him or else. And that’s what he’s saying, really, with Iran:

 

“You’ll do what I say or I’m going to completely raze you to the ground!”

 

Now saying that, do you think there has ever been a more philo-semitic president? And following this, do you think this will change the way Americans vote in the future?

 

[1:37:45]

 

 

Natty: I doubt it. And there may have been more philo-semitic presidents, but certainly not in our time, or I mean, our time is in a time when I’ve been a, like an adult. I think I was 12 at the time when the first Gulf War started, when Bush rolled into Iraq and dragged Blair in and dragged the rest of the British people in. But it’s hard to imagine a more philo-semitic president.

 

And I think part of the problem is. Well, maybe it’s not a problem for them, although it might turn out to be, who knows, depending on how this thing goes, is that more and more people were just nakedly seeing it as that it’s like, why, what possible reason could the American people, like the people in America have for engaging in this terminal war with Iran? What possible cause do the British people have against the people of Iran? You know, flimsy excuses like:

 

“Oh, they’re a terrorist nation and you know, they might at some point have a nuke!”

 

This just doesn’t cut it. This isn’t a reason that sensible people would launch wars against people and go on these destructive campaigns against people.

 

Yuro: Sunni Pakistanis rape children. So we need to fight against them

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“We need to fight a Shia country, a Persian Shia country!”

 

Yeah, absolute lunacy! But people, I think people genuinely understand more now. But this is just jews! This is a war for jews. It’s a war for Israel. And Trump is like deeply, deeply friends with the jewish paedophile who was the mover and shaker for the evil jewish paedophile regime. This is their guy. You know, he is their guy and he’s the guy who’s going to see this done. Not for you, not for your family, not for the American infrastructure, not for the home country and what it means for the future of America, but for Israel and for his jewish handlers. And people, I think, understand that. More and more people understand that, which is why this war is so unpopular.

 

Yuro: We see more and more people waking up to jewish power every day. And in America, I mean, you see mainstream Leftists like Ana Kasparian from the young Turks goes out and just says:

 

“The goyim are waking up! Deal with it!”

 

And that’s amazing to see and it’s a great thing! But at the end of the day there’s no one for them to vote for. The two party system in America is so entrenched, they’re not going to have that option anytime soon to actually get out of it. I mean you’re just going to have a continuation of the same thing where you have presidents get elected and have lower and lower approval ratings, but the people just won’t believe it.

 

Natty: And that’s like you said, no other choice. And I’ll remind, you know, Mark was saying that President Trump ran on like a “no foreign intervention, no foreign wars” ticket. Certainly in 2016 he did. But every president has done that and most of the prime ministers and most of the regimes in this country have run on the same kind of, “we’re not for foreign wars”!

 

And yet every time there’s a foreign war on behalf of Israel and the jews, these people snap to. And all of a sudden it’s:

 

“Well, this war is justified. And this is a terrorist regime and Syria used Sarin gas on its people and Iran is a terrorist state and Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

So these people know that foreign wars aren’t popular and you know, foreign wars within justifications, but foreign wars where there is literally no justification apart from the jews want us to do this, are extremely unpopular! And burn through the veil that these people use to hide what they do and kind of hide the levers they pull in order to get what they want.

 

Mark Collett: That’s very interesting. And I do concur. I don’t think there is anyone else to vote for. But I’m not really here to correct anyone tonight. I think everyone’s made excellent points, but you are actually wrong that it was just, 2016. There are pictures floating around that I’ve actually shared showing with Trump and Vance stood together and it’s the kind of text around them is “the peace ticket”, you know, saying:

 

“You’re voting first, you’re voting for peace!”

 

This is what they ran on this time as well. And Trump did make these huge sort of overtures to the Nobel Committee, that he wanted the Nobel Prize Peace Prize, that he was going to stop these wars, which obviously he hasn’t done.

 

Natty: I think I’m probably guilty of paying less attention to the Trump campaign in 2022, [chuckling] when it was in 2016. But, yeah, I can well believe it. And I’ve heard, I’ve seen that in headlines, quoted for the peace ticket. And Trump lambasting Obama on Twitter at the time, saying:

 

“Oh, Obama’s going to start a war in Iran because he’s such a terrible negotiator and he sucks at being a peaceful president.”

 

And it’s like, yeah so many years later, you’re the guy. You’re the guy these people have activated to get this done.

 

[1:43:07]

 

Mark Collett: Well, indeed. And the next point, because we’re sort of getting towards what do we think’s going to happen?

 

But before we do that, I think one of the interesting things about this is we’ve seen, so there are a lot of, what can I call them, “Shitbag influencers” like Tommy Robinson, Douglas Murray, Andrew Neil. I despise Andrew Neil! Fat, worthless toad! The day he has sort of a gigantic Coronary as he sat eating his sort of duck pate on his terrace in the south of France will be a good day for the world! That guy is always on the wrong side of everything. He wants to attack Iran, wanted all the Covid restrictions. I can’t remember him ever saying anything good. He is scum of the earth!

 

But on the other side, we have seen this in interesting bipartisan pushback. We’ve seen Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Ana Kasparian. There has been this mass awakening to Israel! I mean, Tucker Carlson stood in front of Turning Point USA getting a standing ovation for saying:

 

“Israel needs to get out of American politics!”

 

That is seismic. You know, he is still the biggest American political voice in terms of being an influencer. I think this is incredible!

 

Now, I was somebody that was quite happy for Trump to get in for a couple of reasons, but one of the reasons being that I believed that this would bring things to a head. I believe that the Trump regime would be the regime that accelerated things to a point where numerous people who had previously been extremely philo-semitic would end up coming out, breaking ranks, and there would be a mainstream acceptance of our points. I remember saying that, actually I was briefly invited on WarStrike, of all streams, the night of the election.

 

And I was like:

 

“Look, this isn’t a bad thing! Don’t have a cow over this basically. This is something that may well bring us certain benefits.”

 

And I think that we are sort of seeing this to a large degree now. What do you guys think about this? Because I can’t really remember the last time we’ve actually seen a such a bipartisan move against Israel. And it’s not just the ones I’ve mentioned. I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been incredible! Tucker Carlson’s leading the charge with young Right-wing males and females. Turning Point USA, which used to be absolutely ZOGged, is now a hive of like counter-semitism, if you like.

 

And on top of all of that, having the absolutely delightful and wife ready material known as Ana Kasparian.

 

Yuro: She’s absolutely perfect! [chuckling] Coming out for me!

 

Mark Collett: What? What did you say Yuro?

 

Natty: What did you say?

 

Yuro: It’s a bit brown for me.

 

Natty: Get out! Booted from this stream!

 

Mark Collett: You know what? Do you know what? Yuro’s got this thing, right, where you show any girl who’s got the mildest amount of than, and he goes into some kind of like tail spin as if like White women have never ever set foot out of the house!

 

Yuro: Are Armenians White?

 

Natty: This one is. This one certainly is!

 

Yuro: If she’s anti-semitic, she’s White! Okay.

 

Mark Collett: The question is, Yuro, are you White? [chuckling] Because the fact you’ve asked this of our lady in chief, …

 

Natty: Perfect Queen.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a perfect Queen means maybe you’re, …

 

Yuro: I’m not as big as simp as you are mate!

 

Mark Collett: Mate, there’s nothing simpy about loving Ana!

 

Natty: It’s [chuckling] a justified simpery.

 

Mark Collett: It’s justified simpery. Yeah. And so why I like Ana as well is when she gets angry, she just doesn’t hold back, does she? She’s one of those people, sometimes watching somebody get really angry, …

 

Natty: There was a clip, there was a clip of her on Piers Morgan and she was like yelling at these like jews. There were like six of them on the panel and I think they were all jews apart from her and Piers Morgan. And she’s like yelling and screaming at them because they’re trying to dissemble and you know, do what “aboutery” about the killing in Gaza and the killing kids in Iran and stuff. And she’s really letting them have it! And she’s screaming at them. There was some like Boomer in the Facebook comments, like:

 

“Oh, I tried to watch it but I couldn’t take the screeching!”

 

I just, I put underneath it, I was like:

 

“I would listen to her scream about jews in my ear all night!”

 

Mark Collett: Look, [chuckling] that is how I feel that like she has come out and when she does it? She does it! So if you’re screaming like some mad, sort of disheveled, for want of a better term, “Karen” and so you’re sort of mad because there was only, …

 

Yuro: Karen is a slur.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is, but Karen can also, you know what I mean? You get some women who’ll go crackers over like the fact there’s only seven olives in there, you know, olive pasta. And the menu shows eight or something and they throw an absolute fit over it! But the way she blows up, it’s so attractive. She’s like:

 

“Don’t give me this! You disgusting Zionist pig! You make me sick!”

 

And she’s enunciating every one of her words and she’s not holding back either. She’s like:

 

“You child killing monsters!”

 

Natty: It’s like righteous fury at the people she’s like, that’s been put up on these panel shows.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. Exactly! And when you’re watching it’s extremely attractive! It’s not sort of like I said, I know “Karen” is a bit of an anti-White slur, but it’s not Karen-esque. It’s not like an overly liberal White woman and who’s outraged because of something minor that normal people are like:

 

“Look, just pull yourself together.”

 

The way she does it, I find it to be absolutely cracking! I love it!

 

Anyway, that’s enough glazing of Ana Kasparian. I mean, look, can there ever be enough glazing about the Kasparian? That could be a two hour stream in itself!

 

[1:49:33]

 

 

Natty: It’s for Yuro, apparently. I mean, Yuro’s not on the Kasparian train here, unfortunately. Maybe we’ll have to have a word with [word unclear] after the stream.

 

Mark Collett: We have to, … You mean a beating? [chuckling]

 

Natty: You’re going to a re-education camp.

 

Mark Collett: After the show in the green room, we give him a kicking!

 

So what do you think of this bipartisan movement, though? I find it refreshing. I like it. And it’s got real gravitas. Because, look, I was on the David Duke show earlier and obviously I work with David probably more than anybody else in the world, for better or worse. And I love David! He’s a real character. He can be a bit difficult at times, but he’s a real character. But sadly, David does not have the influence he once had.

 

And I’m not saying that to sort of mock David or deride David. I’m just saying that as a statement of fact. But somebody like Ana Kasparian does have that power! She does have that gravitas, but so does Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. You know, Tucker Carlson. Absolutely massive! And you’re watching these people tear in to the Zionist cause and attack these Warhawk jews. It is very refreshing! I mean, well, for me, it is anyway. I mean, I don’t know about you guys, but I love it!

 

I mean, how does this make you feel after all the years of being in the wilderness? Look, being in the wilderness is something that. I am still very much in the wilderness, despite all my hard work over the years, despite my incredible consistency. Like, if I’m not the perfect guy, okay, not by a long, long means, I am very good at debates, but I’m not the perfect guy. I have my foibles. I screw up, …

 

Yuro: Not good at controlling your temper.

 

Mark Collett: I was gonna joke there by exploding at you!

 

Natty: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: I’m not brilliant at controlling my temper, but one thing you’ve got to say for me is that throughout all these years, I have been extremely consistent in what I’ve stood for.

 

Now, when it comes down to it, seeing these people, for me, anyway, come out and be sort of so, you know, completely anti-Israel. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen it. And it’s not just relying on, as I said, this isn’t to knock David, but it’s not just to rely on me and David Duke making the point anymore. You know, these points are being made by these more mainstream individuals who’ve got serious gravitas. And I actually like that. I think it’s something that I think is really important. Seeing Ana Kasparian and seeing all these others doing it. I think this has taken our message to a new crowd. And it’s interesting to see that there are people all over the political system who have had enough of Israel.

 

Natty: Yeah. And I think having this kind of, it’s not perfect. The things they say aren’t perfect. Right. And the problem isn’t just Israel. And I think most people get that. And this isn’t to kind of pee on your cornflakes, Mark. But even the things they’re saying do give amount of headroom for anyone who’s less sizable and less influential from them to kind of push those boundaries a little bit more. And there is further to push.

 

I mean, we shouldn’t be coming around the campfire at this stage to stretch your wilderness analogy. We should be trying to, we should still be in the wilderness telling the truth and putting the final truth to it. Because, like I said the things are saying are anti-Israel, which is like 90% of the way there, right?

 

And like I said, giving headroom for more, not extreme, that’s not the word, but for a greater and more deep understanding to come forth.

 

And I think that you are going to see from this war with Iran, you’re going to see a tranche of politicians and people emerge who are willing to say these things. And sure, amongst those people there are going to be shills and they’re going to be subversive people, but at some point it just becomes like a political football whether you support Israel and whether you’re going to do their bidding.

 

I mean, one of the disappointing things with Rupert Lowe is he hasn’t really come out against, he hasn’t made a statement against Israel, which I’m sure none of us really expect, but now would be the perfect time for someone in his position to make that leap. We haven’t seen it yet, but I think this just pushes that football a little bit further down the road. You know, pushes the can a little bit further down the road to give space for that to happen.

 

Yuro: I think every day that the Rupert Lowe goes out and doesn’t support Israel, even if he won’t explicitly say that he’s against them, obviously that’s giving us room and whatnot.

 

But another thing, sort of talking about, obviously, the goyim waking up and Trump, I think it is great that we see all these people realizing the extent of jewish power.

 

And I think Trump especially is to thank for it, because he is just so openly philo-semitic in a way that no previous president, even if they love jews as much as he does, they just wouldn’t do it so openly! You know, he goes out there and declares himself the King of Israel and he says this, that and the other. And it’s again, with the attack on Iran and the thing with Venezuela, there’s not even a pretence anymore. It’s just:

 

“We’re doing this because it’s in our interest and we’re attacking Iran because that’s what we want to do!”

 

They’re not having the pretence anymore.

 

[1:55:32]

 

Mark Collett: I don’t like to cut across people because we’ve all been pretty good at not cutting across people. But I just wanted to further your point. You know, when Trump does things which are so sort of egregious [chuckling] that you sort of wonder why he’s saying them. Like when he said:

 

“Oh the Adelsons basically bought me the White House! So whenever they want to just walk in and ask for a policy to be passed, what am I gonna do? It’s the bloody Adelsons! They gave me about half a billion. How are you gonna say no to the people who gave you half a billion? Come on, guys, let’s get things going!”

 

You’re thinking to yourself:

 

“Are you actually saying this? Are you actually saying to people, ‘look, the Adelsons bought me the White House. So then when they want a policy passing, I just bring them in and say, ‘What do you want?’ And when they say, ‘I want this.’ I just give it to them’.”

 

Most people would know which bits not to say out loud. You know, it’s like when you were a kid, your mom was like:

 

“Did you clean up the house?”

 

You’d be like:

 

“Yeah, I did!”

 

But you wouldn’t be:

 

“Well, actually, I spilt the water from the big vase, partially flooded the living room, spent ages dabbing it up, and have hid the stain under the mat!”

 

Because there’s part of it that you don’t say out loud, isn’t there? And there’s part that you say out loud. But Trump, he says it all out loud, and it becomes sort of so almost jarring to hear him say it, because for years, we’ve heard that politicians are bought, they’re sold. You know, powerful foreign forces pay for politicians to do their bidding. And here’s Trump just honestly saying:

 

“Well, that’s exactly what happens! I do it all the time! The Adelsons basically funded me, and I did everything for them. So when they want a policy, I give them!”

 

You don’t say that out loud, do you? You say:

 

“The Adelsons are an important part of what we’re hoping to do, and no one has undue influence over me, but I’m happy to hear from them.”

 

He doesn’t do any of that. There’s no beating around the bush. He basically says:

 

“Jew’s got me in. And when they want a policy passing, I give it to them!”

 

I mean, is that refreshing to hear? For me, it is, because it confirms everything that we’ve always said.

 

Natty: Yeah, he is known for slurping up the “juju come”. As someone put in the chat earlier.

 

I think the worrying thing is, or I guess it’s not worrying. I mean, it’s interesting. So there was like just this ground swell of JQ awareness, like Israel hatred after October 7th because of what Israel was doing to Gaza.

 

And then the media gets to declare:

 

“There’s a ceasefire, Gaza’s over. We can look away now. We can look away from the fact that Israel has been bombing hospitals and stuff.”

 

Because of the nature of the news cycle and everything else, people let it drop. And then this big orange slave, jew slave, Trump, comes along and starts a war with Iran, like, totally on behalf of his jewish handlers in Israel. And all of a sudden it’s like:

 

“Oh, right, my awareness is shaking again.”

 

Like:

 

“Now there’s just another thing that’s like, cannot be ignored where we have to bring out this question again to the public and try and explain why this war for Israel isn’t anything to do with jews and is secretly about Russia.”

 

Or whatever else it is. You know, so, yeah, I mean, awareness, awareness rising!

 

Mark Collett: So we pretty much wrapped up a lot of the things we were going to talk about. And we’ve already said that Israel has been proven through this not to be invincible.

 

And I think that’s one of the key things here. At one point, Israel touted the Iron Dome. It touted their invincibility. I think this has shown something that’s very interesting. It’s highlighted that America is Israel’s lapdog! But it’s also highlighted that without America, Israel couldn’t exist. And that’s important, I think, for two reasons.

 

There’s this symbolic idea of Israel being this invincible outpost in the Middle East that the Iron Dome protects and they can stand alone if necessary. I think Israel have been really undermined here, not just from a moral perspective, but from the view that they can be hurt, which is important. You know, one of the big things, if you’re ever in some kind of conflict, facing what appears to be an immovable or unstoppable enemy, to show that that enemy is, in fact, fallible and can be hurt is very important.

 

And although we’ve hardly seen Israel sink into the Mediterranean, I do think the strikes on Israel have been significant from the point of view that it has shown them to be scared, that if they don’t have the West on their side, they can’t defend themselves.

 

Yuro: Well, it’s like with October 7th. When October 7th happened, it showed the world that they’re not all powerful, they’re not all knowing, they’re not always just gonna win because they’ve got everything on lockdown. Their power does have limits. And there’s some amount of White nationalists who come out and say:

 

“Oh, no, they let that happen1 You know, they let that happen on purpose! That they have a reason to do this.”

 

But actually, it’s like you’re unwilling to believe that they just screwed up that badly.

 

[2:01:21]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m not going to get into a big debate, but I actually believe they let that happen. I believe that that was part of their plan and gave them this imperative to do what they did in Gaza.

 

However, I think Iran’s a different kettle of fish. I think that what we’re seeing with Iran here is something fundamentally much more damaging for them, because they have nothing to gain by letting Iran smash through the Iron Dome. They have nothing that they can say:

 

“Well, this gives us the moral imperative to do X.”

 

Because in the case of Iran, they’ve already done X, haven’t they? X has already been committed to, it’s already been carried out.

 

So I think there’s different things here.

 

But look, let’s wrap this up and we’re going to wrap this up before we do the questions and answers. If anyone wants to Superchat. If you’ve enjoyed the stream, please consider sending a Superchat. But we’re going to wrap this up with, obviously we’ve said this is for the Greater Israel Project and we’ve talked about the political ramifications around the world for America, for Russia, for China, for future conflicts.

 

But one thing we haven’t talked about is the political ramifications here in Britain. Now, obviously Starmer hasn’t embroiled himself and he’s made the right choice in that case, but probably for the wrong reasons. Rather than doing this because he doesn’t want to serve Israel, he’s done this because he doesn’t want to turn the Muslim bloc vote against him any further because he fears losing the next general election.

 

But what we can see here, or what I see here, is a major problem with refugees and they’re talking about potentially two, … There was the, I think it was the Telegraph that stated this. The calculation is that 2.5 million people will be displaced from the region due to this conflict. At the present time, that number could obviously rise and they’re all going to be coming to Europe, they’re not going to be going to Israel.

 

And I’ve always described this as sort of the twin evils of Israel. On one hand, Israel menaces, murders, maims, terrorizes states in the Middle East for its own gain and to maintain dominance in the region. However, the blowback is never for Israel! The blowback of all this ends up hitting Western nations who take the refugees or the people that are displaced.

 

And I think that’s the final piece of the puzzle, that the Greater Israel Project makes Israel more powerful, but by extension due to the knock on effect, it weakens the West, it pushes us closer to a demographic shift that will be unrecoverable and fundamentally takes us a step nearer to being a minority in our ancestral homelands!

 

Natty: Yeah, destabilising its immediate neighbours, like I said earlier, destabilising its immediate neighbours with missiles and bombs and gayops and all the rest of it, is a short timescale. But destabilising European countries with mass immigration and kind of ethnic cleansing and all the rest of that, that’s still just destabilisation. It’s just on a longer time scale. And I alluded to this earlier, but the Israeli gayops and the CIA and Mossad and MI6 operation, well I mean it was the open British government was just aiding like terrorists in Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi. Gaddafi had an agreement with Italy where Italy would pay him to stop, just endless floods of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. And Israel uncaring that that was in place or seeing that actually destroying that was a good thing because it helped destabilise everything, not just Europe, but top to Libya, decided to enact you know, plans against Gaddafi that ended with him, like I said, with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street.

 

And that led to the migration crisis in 2015, 2014, 2015, which is ongoing today. And I just posted in the private chat there because I just looked this up, Morgoth’s Law, which was spoken by Morgoth himself:

 

“No matter where the conflict is in the world, the refugees coming to Europe will be fighting age black and brown men!”

 

And that’s going to hold true for this conflict.

 

Now that might be coincidental in other cases but certainly with Iran this is the double, not the double edged sword but like the win-win situation for Israel. They get to destabilise nations by direct war against their like direct competitors. But they also get to destabilise their so-called “allies” in terms of European nations in America with all these displaced people who then through their human rights groups and refugee groups and these kind of NGOs get to set up migration routes into the countries who are supposedly their allies that they help destabilise. The knock on for politics in this country, unfortunately there won’t be much because we don’t have much of a choice. And if Reform was in power at the moment it would probably be just balls out gung-ho for Israel. So what choice do you have in this country? I mean it’s probably less than anywhere else.

 

Mark Collett: I will say though, I think Yuro is right in what he said. Every day that Rupert Lowe spends not endorsing Israel is a victory from our point of view. You know, I know that might sound like a cucky thing to say, but it has been so long since we’ve had anybody in any form of position of genuine power who hasn’t immediately been a slave to Israel. And it’s one of the things that Tommy Robinson’s been quite upset actually by a number of things Rupert Lowe has said and done. I don’t know if you saw, but Tommy Robinson said:

 

“You know, Rupert Lowe needs to clarify whether black people can be British. Rupert Lowe needs to clarify his position on all these things!”

 

Well, I find that very interesting because that suggests that Tommy and his handlers are getting quite nervous that Rupert isn’t going to be the Zio lap dog they hoped he would.

 

[2:07:56]

 

Natty: Yeah, the kind of the cucked civnat stuff that always bends towards this like piss-weak conservatism, as we’ve seen with Reform, where it just turns out they’re just as I mean they’re not really even civic nationalists, they’re just Conservatives in that anyone’s British, anyone who steps foot on this island is British.

 

So yeah, I mean funnily enough, Tommy wrote, those questions from Tommy Robinson he tried to put to Rupert Lowe:

 

“We’re in the wake of the Iran war starting and Rupert Lowe not coming out in support of Israel.”

 

And all of a sudden here you’ve got Tommy Robinson popping up like fresh from snorting up lines of coke on a mirror somewhere in America asking him about the same, well as pulling the same gay ops that he tried with the BNP all those years ago, which you know about very well, Mark.

 

Yuro: And after hopping off his private jet with his son, who’s posting about it on Instagram while he begs for money from poor White people who haven’t got a dime to scrape together.

 

Natty: Yeah, Tommy Robinson, just to reiterate, is absolute scum! He is scum! Everything out of Tommy Robinson’s mouth is like a jewish handler somewhere. And that has become more and more clear! There’s no like, no intersection of lines from real dissidency in this country in the West. And Tommy Robinson, this is like a literal jewish mouthpiece being paid by Israel to say the things he does.

 

And if you think there’s some part of Tommy that’s still good or some part of him that’s still worth listening to, then you simply haven’t been paying attention. And you need to, I don’t know, get with the programme or get your head right, because he’s evil, he’s terrible, and he’s a scumbag!

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

So I think we’ve had a pretty robust chat. We’re going to do the Superchats in a couple of seconds. If you want a Superchat, please do.

 

But I’ll say this, I think in conclusion. I’ve said this many times before, but the judeo-American empire is the greatest threat to the world!

 

Yuro: And I’ve said they are the great Satan!

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s not just the greatest threat, is it to White people. Now we obviously are fundamentally our thoughts are for White people. That’s the most important thing for us, that we look after people of European descent.

 

However, it’s not just people of European descent that suffer under the judeo-American State. Obviously Arabs suffer immensely.

 

And a lot of the problems created by the judeo-American States, actions such as these unnecessary wars, these toppling of sovereign regimes, the murder of government leaders in foreign countries, like Colonel Gaddafi. And look, when we say this, we’re not saying that Colonel Gaddafi is our hero or that we loved everything he did, but he was stopping millions of people passing through his country and entering Europe. And I’m sure that when he was toppled, there were many people within the Israeli regime and many leading jews in America and Europe that were very happy that there was going to be even more migrants headed to Europe.

 

And I believe that the only real way that the world can achieve freedom is for the judeo-American Empire to fall. I don’t know whether you guys agree with that. Obviously have 30 seconds each to sum up, or a minute or whatever you need.

 

Natty: That’s totally correct! And that is the line of, like I said a second ago, real dissidency, and this kind of rightoid, Right-wing, edgy conservatism. Like you said, the judeo-American Empire is the threat, is the problem! And if you’re not willing to say that, if you’re not willing to like cheer on its losses, then you’re not on the same level as you should be. I mean, you’re not where you should be. And I’m sure everyone listening to this is pretty much there, but those are the lines. There’s not a Left, Right, divide. There’s not a third Worldist, whatever it is, divide. It’s just you’re either hoping for this evil entity to fail or you’re not at this point. But, and we’re seeing, hopefully we’re seeing part of it sailing here. We’re going to see it fail more and more.

 

So that’s what I’m looking forward to. Not just that, but the visceral feeling when you, like you said, see a cluster munition raining down on Tel Aviv, feels good too. So enjoy it.

 

Yuro: White people the world over shall not be free until organised jewry is disempowered! Inshallah!

 

Mark Collett: That [chuckling] was the most concise you’ve been all night mate. Superb!

 

So, yeah, I think it’s been a very productive stream this evening.

 

And I think we’ve talked about a lot of things that people would want us to talk about. And without being boastful, I think that tonight we’ve kind of hit on more or less every major point, unless we haven’t.

 

But I think we put a lot of effort, obviously into ensuring that we did hit every major talking point tonight. And this was the, probably, I’d say the most comprehensive coverage of this particular issue that anyone will get. So I’m hoping that you guys enjoyed it. And we are going to do the Superchats now.

 

[2:13:54]

 

So thank you to everyone who has Superchatted. And if you haven’t, there is obviously still time. And remember, if you do send a financial contribution, it’s gratefully received because it’s what allows me to keep doing things like this and doing these streams.

 

Anyway, Mr. Skywalker gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“You and Red Ice were definitely correct about ZOG’s superior tactical advantage, which I never doubted. Still Iran and its proxies and have fared better than expected. Landing hits on ZOG’s military assets.”

 

And he goes on with another $3 and said:

 

“It appears ZOG is carpet bombing civilian structures in Iran now, as many military bases and missile sites are up to a thousand feet below ground, very difficult to destroy. Do you think ZOG will use ICBMs?”

 

I think we’ve said that actually that fundamentally we are seeing probably a better sort of defense than people may have initially thought. However, obviously going up against the judeo-American empire is absolutely not an easy thing to do they are doing better than we thought.

 

And interestingly, the Americans are already resorting to these horrific tactics of bombing civilian structures. Do you think Trump would go as far as using an ICBM?

 

Natty: It’s possible. You know, who knows? At every juncture where you think Trump isn’t going to do something, you know, sometimes, well, quite often he will just go ahead and do it. The problem with nukes is, one that’s a line that if you cross has real implications. If you drop a nuke on a country just because you started a war and are then subsequently losing that war,

 

Yuro: If you started a war to stop them having nukes and then when you have lost you use them!

 

Natty: Yeah, it kind of undermines, it’s a massive red line. Like I said, probably implications that none of us even can think about at this stage.

 

The second thing is, nukes, for all this talk of tactical nukes, they’re a surface weapon. You detonate them above ground. So they don’t really, in this war against Iran, they don’t really have like a tactical purpose and they would only be used to destroy, like, surface, weak, soft civilian targets, like cities. I mean, nukes are designed to be used on cities that are all like massed troop build-ups, which Iran doesn’t have. So morally it would be reprehensible and tactically it’d be stupid. Although it would just, it would literally just be against civilians. To use them in this war would be like, against civilian targets.

 

Yuro: Yeah, it wouldn’t benefit them one bit. And there’s no way that Russia and China would not respond to it. And that’s not saying that they would launch nukes themselves, but there would have to be some kind of bigger response from them. To get more actively involved.

 

Mark Collett: And I think Natty hit the real point here. The only time nukes have ever been used are on civilian targets. They are not a weapon that is used really for military sites. There’s all this talk of:

 

“Oh, well, people have got tactical nukes now, and a tactical nuke does this and the fallout’s not as great.”

 

And we’ve heard all of these sort of takes before, but fundamentally the only proven use for a nuke is to be used against a civilian target. That’s just the way it is.

 

And I personally believe that if the Americans did this and took it down that route, it would be this fundamental turning point that I’m not sure the world could recover from that you know, it’s happened obviously twice before and it was horrific what the Americans did to the Japanese. But to do it now and for America to be doing it because they started the war and it wasn’t going their way, I think the world would change in a way that we probably couldn’t actually completely understand right now! But I don’t think it will go nuclear.

 

Thank you so much for the two Superchats, though. Ruins in a Landscape gave $50. Thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. Bay of Kings gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thanks, Mark. It appears Natty’s dropped out.”

 

One of his devices has come unconnected, it says on the screen. I’m sure he’ll be back. Arab Social Nationalist gave $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thoughts on the spectacle of the Nigerian leader of the opposition, Olukemi Olufuntu Adagoki Badenok and Farage arguing that Starmer hasn’t done enough for the Yanks. There is no opposition in the British establishment. Ignore a whisper of dissent in Parliament. War for jews unites the establishment.”

 

I think this is very interesting. And obviously Badenock and Farage are looking at what got Trump to power. Now, fundamentally, Farage and Badenok are both out of power at the moment and I think they’re both kissing up to Israel as much as they can, hoping that that will be their ticket to a Trump style run at Parliament. And let’s face it, although at the moment Farage is the favourite to win the next general election, that can all change. And he is looking at sort of shoring up his position. But Kemi Badenok is looking at going into a general election where she will be decimated.

 

So it is interesting to see both Badenoch and Farage fighting to see who can be the most philo-semitic on this particular issue.

 

But I’ll say this, and this isn’t meant to be like a cold way to leave the stream, or a black pill at the end or anything of the sort. But there are still an awful lot, and I call them Boomers because they generally are from that sort of age bracket. Now, it’s not to say all Boomers are evil, but there generally is this sort of Boomer mentality of:

 

“Well, bomb them all! Get rid of the Arabs! We need to support Israel! They’re our greatest ally!”

 

And that rhetoric does still appeal to, I would say, a sizable portion of the Boomer population.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree. And because they don’t really want to think about it and the implications of it. So looks like:

 

“Oh, something else is going on. Well, to hell with them all! Just blow them all up! Bloody Arabs!”

 

And that’s a cultivated mentality. That’s not an accident that people say things like that and think things like that. This callous, cold, bloodthirsty, you know, mentality that’s been instilled in people through, I mean, basically like a real use of the term racism, where it’s:

 

“Yeah, Arabs are like dirty brown people and killing them anywhere is good!”

 

It’s like well, a normal human being, a moral human being doesn’t actually think that way. And if you’ve been led into thinking that some like, cartoon villain version of like, I don’t know, like a Western man, is ridiculous and retarded and immoral, and the people who put that idea in your head have taken a long time to do it, but have succeeded, if you come out making statements like that.

 

Yuro: And to the extent that it is a naturally occurring phenomenon, it’s as a result of having the Pakistani rape gangs that jewish people and organisations brought here and having the Sunni Wahhabi terrorists who are created by the funding of Saudi Arabia and Israel’s allies.

 

[2:22:23]

 

Natty: Oh, yeah, when Israel needed a recruiting ground for ISIS to destabilise Syria, they just used our country. And the overspill where like little girls were getting blown up in concerts or people were getting stabbed on London Bridge, that was exceptional.

 

Yuro: It’s just a bonus to them.

 

Natty: Yeah, that was just like a little side project for them.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, guys. We’ll go on to the next Superchat. It’s from Tomorrow’s Victims who gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“The vast majority of us here in Yank land do not want the stupid war. Cheers to all my UK people.”

 

Thank you so much! Some Guy 14 gave $10. Thank you so much! And he subscribed for $10. Well, that’s much appreciated. Remember, you can subscribe to me over on Entropy and Rumble, and that means you make a monthly donation.

 

And obviously on Entropy you can subscribe for any amount and Rumble is fixed, $5. But on Rumble, we’ve got a good number of subs now, a good number of followers, and if we had sort of 4 or 500 subs, that would just be phenomenal! And obviously it would really help me financially and it wouldn’t really make a massive difference to people as $5 is what, the price of a large can of Red Bull these days. But if enough people did that, it’d make a huge difference to me.

 

We also have one Superchat over on Rumble, only one tonight, and it’s from Archie P007. Thank you so much! Okay, $5. And you said:

 

“I was all in with Trump, the great awakening and all that he has sold his soul for Israeli gold. No one wins a war, only the people suffer always. Follow the money. Trump is Israel first, it seems.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, I obviously, I completely agree with that. Trump is Israel first. And Trump is someone who is absolutely committed to Israel, I think, in a way that I’m not sure we’ve ever seen before. I don’t think we’ve ever seen a president this committed to the state of Israel, which is obviously interesting in itself to say that, to say we’ve never had a president that is this committed to Israel, but he certainly is.

 

And at the moment, he is proving his loyalty to that nation to an unbelievable point! And whether this works for him in the long run or not, who knows? But I think it’s fair to say that he is risking everything for his loyalty to people who, …

 

And the interesting thing with these people is they did not support him when he was out in the wilderness. One of the interesting things with Trump is when he was saying:

 

“Look, the election was rigged.”

 

Netanyahu was actually the first foreign leader to say to Biden, to congratulate Biden on his victory. Can you remember that? I mean, Trump went mental about that at the time because he thought Netanyahu was his best friend. But it just goes to show, Trump isn’t actually. Well, he doesn’t actually have any principles whatsoever, does he? Trump is actually a guy that the Israelis can kick him, they can treat him like he’s their boy, their little dog. And when it comes down to it, he will take it time and again.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean the only difference, just to add the only difference is how open it is now. I mean, like I said earlier, the other president have probably done everything to the detriment of their own people on behalf of Israel. But Trump is just open about it and everyone gets it and everyone knows now and he’s just still ploughing ahead with it. So there’s the difference with this one.

 

Mark Collett: Anything to add Yuro?

 

Yuro: No, no, I think we’ve covered most of that already.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well look, that brings us to the end of the stream.

 

Thank you so much to everyone who has been here and obviously if you haven’t Superchatted and you’re watching this on replay, you can donate anytime you like on replay.

 

And if you do support these streams, especially these long form discussions which take a reasonable amount of time to prepare and we put a lot of effort into, please do consider sending a Superchat and we will keep doing them. Anyway guys, if you want to say good night, we’ll go around the group and then we will wrap things up.

 

[2:26:52]

 

Natty: Night guys. I have been looking at the chat and there’s been a lot of like pretty decent discussion in there. So I appreciate everyone who’s been here and you know, it’s good, it’s good getting all this down and talking about this because a lot of this stuff is beyond the kind of political divide that you see in this country between even nationalists who say things like:

 

“Oh, I don’t care about either side and they can kill each other!”

 

And that’s like the best you can hope for out of supposed Right-wingers and dissidents in this country. But I think a sober analysis and a sober talk about what it all means and what’s happening is worthwhile. So thanks to you two and thanks to the chat for turning up and I’ll see you around.

 

Yuro: Yeah, thanks for having me on. It’s been a good talk with both of you. Obviously we do get a bit of this chat going on with the A-Team, which I’m no longer going to be with because Sam’s back unless I’m a stand-in when someone’s away. But it was good to talk about this stuff. And maybe going forward I will get back into doing some sort of show again on my own. Maybe I’ll revive TASOB. Who knows?

 

Natty: Be very happy if you revived TASOB, buddy. So look forward to it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, thank you to both of you, it’s been a great chat. I just want to wrap things up by saying thank you to everybody.

 

Well, thank you first to Natty and Yuro for giving up their evenings. You know, obviously we enjoy doing this. We’re friends in real life and I think we’ve got pretty good chemistry and I think it’s been a pretty entertaining stream. I would also like to say a huge thank you to everyone who donated. Remember, you can donate at any point you wish.

 

And finally, a massive thank you to everybody who tuned in. We had really good attendance night. Lots of people tuning in, lots of people enjoying the stream and a really sort of quick, moving, interesting discussion on both the Odysee and the Rumble chat.

 

So thank you to everyone who participated.

 

Anyway, I won’t be back on Sunday. It was unlikely I’ll be back on Sunday because it was my son’s birthday this week and we’re having a little party for him on Sunday. So that will likely be something that may run on and I don’t really want to be rushing through that to do a Sunday night film review or stream. I probably just want to enjoy just a little bit of family time, which I’m sure no one begrudges me. And I will be doing that.

 

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday for Patriotic Weekly Review. Until then, thank you everybody, good night and look after yourselves.

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/16/2026 = 288)

Mark Collett
9 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to my work:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

5
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
On YT comments, I’ve noticed more people seem to be realising that Kosher Tommy’s brand of Nationalism is fraudulent & serves no purpose to British people.

14
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Like the English, the Iranians have no other country. Resistance is the only option.

11
0
Hide replies
Aspect of Divinity
5 days ago
I pray to God that the Iranian people succeed in their war against the Zionists and their Western puppets

@RonP1
9 days ago
A safe rule: Never get into bed with the Jew

10
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I have a cousin that married a Jewess. He is dead to me. I used to talk to his Mom frequently and she would complain how his wife basically ended Christmas in their family and how she’s rarely allowed to see her grandchild. I eventually told her “well what do you expect, he married a Jew”. She won’t talk to me anymore lol. My whole family is a bunch of sleepers, but that particular family is fuked. Her other son adopted a South Korean baby when he could have adopted a White baby. I’m done with that whole family.

7
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Not a good move, I guess people who are not race-conscious fall into this trap,
they probably believe ‘It’s just a religion’ and end up with an ugly contaminated baby

3
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Especially someone who marries a Jew, not much you can do there, especially once kids are involved. Even if they subconsciously start to realize their mistake, not only will they never attribute it to the spouse being a Jew, but they are caught in a bind not easily remedied. Same with White people who adopt non-White kids. Dead to me. If there was any possibility to fixing them in the past, that possibility is long gone.

2
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Imagine working out their Holo story is BS, but having to go along with it for the rest of your life because the wife is Jewish! lol

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I have my doubts my cousin would ever believe at any point that the holo story is a hoax. An old friend of my family also has a son who married a Jewess and from what I know about the 2 families, they are identical – the Jewess wears the pants, the family is Jewish to the core and Whiteness and Christianity has been stripped away. It’s pathetic.

2
0

@Theos19
6 days ago
Sounds like jgew hollywood did its work well on that family bro, sorry to hear this. There is nothing more shameful for a white man than to have a mixed breed child. Adopting another child not of your race is one of the most cucked things you can do. Raising another mans offspring with resources that should be for your own – how f-cking cucked is that. Someone else fcked your girl and put a kid in her, and you are raising their kid LOL. I was in the queue for the checkout once and I got caught staring at a man with his yellow wife (fat b-tch) and his mixed breed freakish looking son, I was with my wife and son around the same age. I couldn’t help but stare, it was like looking at a crash at the side of the road, or someone freakish you know? The cashier had to call me out and ask if she could help. After he noticed me the guy looked crestfallen and his yellow wife didn’t have any respect for him whatsoever lol.

1
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
I’m ashamed to admit that I started out as anti jihad, solely because of my job… I tried to rescue English girls from Pakistani Muslims who were mass raping torturing them, I did 20 years in my profession and saw the government as 100% anti White, anti English in every way. Mark et al helped me understand the truth!

6
0
Hide replies

@Theos19
6 days ago
Were you a social worker? I recall some of your comments on live chats over the years, harrowing stuff. Thank you for trying to stand up to evil. God will recognize his own.

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
6 days ago
Yes for 20 years! I did rescue many English girls, the youngest was age 8! The government is extremely anti White.

3
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
Purim explained…
“One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King’s minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman’s ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called “Haman’s Ears,” revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew in our midst”
JRM by Arnold Leese

6
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
The Young Turks, Anna K and all that group are not “awakening”. They are still anti-White and that will never change. While Anna does have harsh words for Jews as well as Israel, she and TYT are still anti-White libtards. Please stop blowing a load in your shorts because you think she’s hot. It is, indeed, simp behavior and quite embarrassing for us all.
She is/They are ANTI-WHITE. Got it?
Covington was right. Being pro-White is something Whites have a really hard time doing, even those that are racially conscious.

5
1
Hide replies
Judy_Izzum
8 days ago
anti-white or not, she is still the guest of honour at my hand party

4
2

@RonP1
9 days ago
Civ Nat = Kosher Nationalism

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump comes from the jewish community. He has been around them his entire life. They made his career in realestate in New York. He has belonged to them his whole adult life.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Remember: these jews bombed Qatar to kill Hamas’s chief negotiator. They’re out of control, and they cannot be negotiated with.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s not that they don’t think about it: the British establishment is actively antagonistic towards native British people; it’s not indifference, it’s active malice.

4
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Jews, Muslims, darkies in general. They all gotta go

4
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Next false flag: Nuclear attack on USA, EU country or both. Could be an EMP nuke instead of ground attack.
Lots of dissent for this war on both sides of political aisle, they need something like a “9/11” to force more Westerners to support the war. Approval is falling hard. They need a false flag event. Also would “justify” nuking Iran.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Shalom

0
5
Green
9 days ago
Excellent episode title. Spot-on. Thanks for your incredibly important work, Mark.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
THE JEW CRIES OUT IN PAIN AS HE SHITS HIMSELF AT THE BOMB SHELTER!

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
yes I know a jew was in charge of the Armenian genocide. And the fact that Armenians are Christians made it so much enjoyable for the jews.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
I like that the left woke up to the jq but make no mistake they still hate white men. And want white genocide.

1
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
The left did not “wake up to the Jewish question”. They still love and defend Jews. They do not see the Israel problem as a Jewish problem, they see it as a White Supremacy problem. I know it all sounds so contradictory and stupid, but that is what you get with a brainwashed group of people. They only oppose and support what they are told to, without thinking about it.

2
0
Prison Ships
9 days ago
The Honourable Pastor Chuck Baldwin leads +40k AntiZionist Christians out of Liberty Fellowship Montana.

3
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson drives a Bentley, all while his rightoid followers pay for his “legal fund”.

3
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
The likes are 101 and they need to be 109! Or 110, 111 etc

2
0
Edelweiß
8 days ago
Unless Judeo-Christian civilization is destroyed, the European race will die. Crush Jehovah! Hail Jupiter and give us victory!

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
We Whites must destroy the enemy race; they have relentlessly been attempted to destroy us for centuries! We Whites, of European descent must end this madness for the sake of all humanity.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
it was a bit like watching the A-Team but without the game and gay dancing tbf

2
0
Natty
9 days ago
night guys

1
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Cheers goyim \o

2
0

@RonP1
9 days ago(edited)
Remember before the 2016 election when the bell end said he would re-investigate 9/11 if he ever got into power

2
0
Ulrich22
9 days ago
most people dont have real opinion at all. they all hope that it goes away and they can forget about it like they did for the last 80 years or so.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Decades of Hollywood propaganda had a big part in it.

2
0

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Well done lads, I’ve learned a lot tonight

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
Me too, watching on replay! My friends dog is healing well, and has thoroughly enjoyed the chicken , skin and stock .

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Imagine a future Britain that has normal relations with foreign countries. It’s not asking for much.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@MarkCollett
– Starmer SAYS he’s not getting involved, but as we know from Gaza, he can assist Israel secretly. Don’t be quick to believe his public stance.

2
0

@Stryker!
9 days ago

@VesselofGrace
I may have to return to my roots. lol

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“Peace through perpetual war, goyim!”

2
0

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
No Iranian ever called me a goyim

2
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago
I don’t like this new term “Epstein regime” it takes away from “ZOG”, which is much more poignant.

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
“ZOG” deters from Jew though.

1
0
Bronze Green Oakwood
5 days ago
“I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen”
That came out of nowhere, nearly spat out my drink there.

1
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
“We tried the internet and spent years tapping to one another on keyboards, because we bought into the idea that ‘education’ was the answer, and if we could just get the truth to people, then things would change. Well, education without action isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit. We got the truth to people, all right, and it turned out to be nothing but a bunch of noise that was simply ignored, because the internet was where it stayed. Nobody ever did anything except tap on keyboards. Tapping on keyboards was no threat to them, we just let off steam and nothing changed. It is now crystal clear to any white man with two brain cells to rub together that the only thing that will make these dogs in power hear the word no is the sound of…”
Brigade

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are banking on the Americanisation of British politics, and I think they’re miscalculating.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You’re not as much in the wilderness as you think, Mark. It’s the Dissident right that has moved the mainstream to the Jewish Question.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I wouldn’t lend a jew my lighter, much less die for him. Imagine it.

1
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
His father before him was the exact same.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran, in principle, doesn’t want to be anyone’s vassal. They want mutually beneficial relationships, not to be a junior partner.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
This relationship with Russia is new. Historically, Iran didn’t have options for buying a new airforce, plus they’re fixated on developing their own capabilities.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The jew stands atop a pile of dead children and declares “AND WHAT, GOY?”

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The strength of the jew is that he is bold, and he is willing to shock the enemy with acts of depravity that are unthinkable for normal people.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
There’s no nobility in Western leadership anymore. These decrepit democracies have allowed the lowest filth of society to take power. Good men, sound men, competent men, are locked out of power.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You can’t be pro-White and drive wedges between Western countries the way Trump does. He’s a diplomatic vandal.

1
0

@why
9 days ago
lol.. its a fun song

0
1

@Germanicus
9 days ago
Purimfest 2026, that’s what I’m calling it

1
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Howdy good folk

1
0
Natty
9 days ago
howdy troops

2
1

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Lana Loktef or Anna K….choose one

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Dumb question on a channel like this. Anna K is a commie leftist no matter what her views
are on Israel and even Jews. She still believes Whites are evil. She is Anti-White! Lana, on the other hand, it 100% OUR PEOPLE. So, again, dumb question.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re White enough, for goodness sake.

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I generally like your comments, but as semite you’re non-White thus you have no place defining who is and is not “White”. That is OUR turf. Respect the boundaries (pun intended).

2
1

@why
9 days ago
jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
I LOVE JEWS

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bruh jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
wtf

0
3

@why
9 days ago
jews behind it all????

0
3

@why
9 days ago
gubbermints

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bayonet up the bum is gonna feel like a good option

0
3
Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
6
Hide replies
– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
8 days ago
Maybe not all you Jews are paedophiles, but enough are that we can make these generalizations.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
brutal

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
o/

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
maybe switch every episode between players so all can play?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
good night volks

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
14

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That seems like an age ago

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers-of-the-soul, I call them. And they are mostly evil. It’s okay to say so.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is capable of going nut and ordering a nuclear strike. He kept asking about it during his first term, apparently.

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I believe nuclear false flag first on USA, EU or bother, then they blame Iran and will nuke Iran.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
hahaha

Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
As far as the ” Greater Israel ” is concerned, Israel has every right to annexe terriories from Judea and Samaria,not because of ” biblical rights ” but because ever since Israel was created has faced constant aggressive wars from its neighbours..
When an aggresor wages a war and looses he has to pay a price.
Palestinians had many chances to create their own state yet they rejected everyone.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
“ever since Israel was created”
The creation of Israel was itself the original massive aggression which initiated all the interminable ongoing wars and unrest.
“Palestinians had many chances to create their own state”
The Zionists would never allow any viable, truly independent Palestinian state to arise. Such an option has never been on the negotiating table. The Zionist maximalists were determined to complete the ethnic cleansing of Palestine begun with the Nakba right from the beginning. Such hardliners have been openly running Israeli governments since Likud was first elected in 1977, and even before that exercised power from behind the scenes. For example, the creation of the Israeli nuclear weapon capability led by Shimon Perez at the behest of Ben Gurion; and the hardliner initiation of the 1967 Six Day War to take control of the West Bank and Golan Heights.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
So you think that when Israel was created in 1948 ,by concetration camps survivors and a few others and was attacked by 5 Arab countries ,it was able to conduct an aggressive war.Ok

Show reply
Truth hurts
9 days ago
So you guys think that if Israel is destroyed, UK and USA will be safer with the goat loving Agiadolahs, who beleive martyrdom and the 72 virgins ,being in charge of Iran’s nuclear arsenal.
That’s fine.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
The only reason Muslims pose even the slightest threat to the US or UK is because Jewish-led elites have mass imported them into the US and UK as part of their Great Replacement. The Great Replacement is the Jewish master strategy for stealing White nations from their people. It is not merely Muslims being mass imported. It is infinity non-Whites, both Muslim and non-Muslim.
Jewish supremacism is the fundamental problem, never part of the solution.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Wow .I didnt know that the Pakistanis and the Somalians are in the UK because of Israel. Thank you for letting me know.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Pakistanis and other immivaders are in the UK because of powerful British Jews and the treasonous elites like Tony Blair who are allied with them. Jewish supremacism includes but is very far from being limited to Zionism.

Hide replies
Truth hurts
7 days ago
Blair brought the Pakistanis
ok.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
7 days ago
You really are clueless about history. There were some Pakistanis in Britain before Blair but it was Blair’s New Labor government which opened the floodgates to mass non-White immigration into the UK. I recall reading an article by Keith Woods a few years ago about this. He quoted statistics.

1
0
TDOF
5 days ago
Read:
https://archive.org/details/the-death-of-fragility-2nd-edition_202507

@ゼロHope
6 days ago
1:37:25
It is far more accurate to say Trump is saying, do as a I say and i’ll shot. There is no out option for Iran. It’s like “shame they won’t come to the table” but also Unconditional surrender, and we blew up the table and the guy negotiating with us.
There is nothing to negotiate. This is like the last time we attacked Iran, Trump started with the negotiating position of, “bomb yourself.” What is there to even to discuss? Especially after killing the pope-king of shia islam. You can’t simply do that, declare victory and leave. Everything of value with in striking distance, Iran will strike. They have choice, they couldn’t surrender if they wanted to.

Kevin
6 days ago
Ben Gavir currently in hospital and his house burning. so yes, we have seen such attacks

Kevin
6 days ago
they did hit one of the carriers with a drone, but they moved them too far away. why dont you know anything about what you are trying to talk about?

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia can’t produce infinite airplanes! come on! they don’t even have enough planes for their own war

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia is helping and Russia has made many public statements, they are just not covered. before the whole thing started every day Russia was sending plane after plane of weapons to them. Russia also spoke to Trump today and seems to have warned him they won’t let the US topple the government. right after Trump started talking about backing out.

@Kubatism
8 days ago
You are probably right, but the Venezuelan stuff also points to a broader context not discussed here – the China future war. All Chinese allies: Russia (bogged down in Ukraine), Venezuela (oil), Iran (supports Russian war effort and oil) you’ve got South Africa next (the current Afrikaner emigration policy of US, Ramaphosa humiliated) you’ve got only Brazil and India left – and India won’t help China

Alice1488
8 days ago
I love listening to Mark, Natty and Yuro! Actually real information about what’s going on! I pray that Isreal is nuked!

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
ALOHA SNACKBAR

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Warren Balogh is the master of this line of thinking

@Natty

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
The Colonel’s Fried Chicken was the best

0KT0BER
9 days ago
https://rocketreach.co/orla-minihane-email_748059991

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
DIdn’t he mention Ian Wright in particular?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
In British politics, crumbs from politicians feel like a slap up meal, alas.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That agreement still has legal force in Libya, if the EU decides to keep up their part.

@vengeance
9 days ago
i dont though

@vengeance
9 days ago
dawson agrees with you mark

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I think every leader will get assassinated that are against jews. Remember that Austrian far right prime minister that was killed in a strange car crash?

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Jörg Haider, killed in a car crash in 2008 while leading the polls in elections to the Austrian parliament.
“[Haider] was Governor of Carinthia on two occasions, the long-time leader of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and later Chairman of the Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich, BZÖ), a breakaway party from the FPÖ….. Haider died in a car accident shortly after leading the BZÖ in the 2008 Austrian parliamentary elections.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s because he’s thick, Mark. It’s as simple as that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes Trump’s crass vulgarity and his lack of discretion and restraint have helped a lot.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
*more

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Lowe is a tory of the soul, and he’s on a journey. Perhaps he will do it.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
This stream is the funniest :joy:

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re not National Socialists, but they don’t need to be.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We crank anti-semites are vindicated. Years of naming them, against the protests of pearl-clutching rightoids is bearing fruit. Enjoy the compliment.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
the donmeh Turks were jews

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
i get it, shes right now though

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s like a British person working for an Indian as a servant.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
Yeah but working for people who genocided you shows a lack of self respect.

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
everyone comes from somewhere buddy

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Come on Mark an Armenian woman working for Turks? I like people with self respect.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
She wants to be careful though. Sometimes, she’s seconds from throwing Romans.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
hahaha

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
NO HE IS GREEN!!!

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
She is Armenian

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
MAGA or MIGA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tucker is a very naughty goy. He might end up having some sort of accident.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Tucker was recently denounced by Trum and kicked out of the “MAGA” movement.

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
The Iranians have developed small submarines that are essentially underwater “drones” with which they can target American ships. It’s not just missiles that are a threat to Americans.

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Had a boomer tell me yesterday: “thank g-d trump bombed Iran. My grandbabbies are safe” hhhhWuuuuut???

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
My beloved Ana. Watching her journey has been terrific.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
+his jewish mentor

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yep

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lots of Russian cargo planes delivered something to Iran

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
We don’t know because help would certainly not go through official channels. Who knows how much Russian aid actually is.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“You have the clock, but we have the time” – Some Ayatollah.

@bagelsandloxism
9 days ago
they have hypersonic Iran is an advanced country

@vengeance
9 days ago
there are no more missles. they cant be made any faster.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lawnmowers of mass destruction

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
they say 80%

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
then the party starts

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yeah they’ve used the old stock to drain the AD systems. The good stuff is yet to come, when the jews run out of American interceptors

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
I hope they wait for the interceptors to be used up first

@vengeance
9 days ago
death, death

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or Mario

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Iran has no allies only jew controlled enemies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s becoming impossible for Iranian moderates to argue against getting the nuclear bomb.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
they suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
lol russia cant do shit

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It didn’t help Syria

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Sanctions – and historic Russian reluctance to sell them jets

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
because that costs a ton of money

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I’m sure that fatwa still stands now that he’s dead.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran has this hyper-fixation on self-sufficiency. It’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
China will look at this shitshow and conclude that they’ll defeat the Americans if they attempt to stop unification with Taiwan.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
russia and the US suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
endless whataboutism

@noreplacement
9 days ago
The heat pumps are good for some things. But not homes and DHW

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Heat pumps are noisy and do not get hot enough. We have one

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Winter in Europe will get interesting

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
110%

@Natty

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
can you imagine making love to jigsaw

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
imagine the smell…

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I wonder what his reaction was when he first saw her knob?

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
yuck.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Nihil sub sōle novum, governments have been doing this since the dawn of time since the first peasant revolts.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
he needed to attack before the midterms

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is in constant touch with Laura Loomer, and he thinks that she is connected to the base and he listens to her jewish lies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Franco,

@MarkCollett
Let’s not forget Franco. He lasted till the 70s.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@utopia148800
Doing that might be the point of no return.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
it depends how much murder the government is willing to commit and I think they will just start mass killing people.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
The Peace President

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Of course, everything was done on purpose, I wouldn’t be surprised if they said that the girls read Mein Kampf.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They could topple the regime. The monarchy is despised.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Murdoch Murdoch episode with the Trump train lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
LOL!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Andrew Neill looks like a clump of haemorrhoids

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
gross

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
HAHAHAHAHA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They think they can make the state collapse, which means that they refuse to believe that Iran is a real, capable country. This tendency to underestimate and insult the enemy could be their undoing. They did the same with Yemen. They couldn’t understand the resilience of the Yemenis.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
shows the power of PR and sticking to the script

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they wanted to hit the girls school

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
yes!

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@why
who is that aimed at?

Natty
9 days ago

@why
do we?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
I don’t know it’s all the same fake terrorist org working for israel

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We’ve been assured they do “surgical strikes” for decades. Either they can, or they can’t – or they won’t. It’s clearly deliberate.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
“Iran military says Strait of Hormuz remains open, but any US, Israeli ship will be targeted” lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
9 days ago
yet you support faggots who want to blame women and hitler — like keith woods and nativist

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
isis k

@utopia148800

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
You guys remember when a jew was screaming at a Russia Today reporter that Russia will pay for supporting Iran than a few months later a giant ISIS terrorist attack was launched at a Russian Mall?

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they did the legal games with the German soldiers after the war, too. Instead of POW, called them Disarmed Enemy Forces. To circumvent the Geneva conventions.

0KT0BER
9 days ago
Terror Cimbricus

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I don’t think America actually has allies, but I think you hinted at that

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
always, because America is controlled by jews so they essentially act as jews.

@teja
9 days ago
Trump Judenknecht!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes America does betray its “allies”.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
no people just have short memories, When Bush senior told the Shias to rebel against Saddam and America will help them than when they revolted Saddam brutally massacred them and America refused to help.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
I’m waiting for the sequel to USS Liberty

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Right.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It’s obvious now why Trump kidnapped and took over Venezuala. Oil

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump, with his bad-faith fake negotiations has changed America’s international standing forever. Who on earth would do a deal with them now? He’s a diplomatic arsonist. Look what he’s done to Canada.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein clique works too

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
They are using the term regime since Saddam

@why
9 days ago
what are we talking about guys?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
And I imagine there no advisors around Trump who are willing to tell him things he doesn’t want to hear.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump hates nuance, and complexity, and he wants reality to match his simplistic hopes. He wants this to be easy, and he cannot accept that it isn’t easy at all.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or, or, jews being stoned.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
hahah jews don’t think so. That’s why they had Sam Hyde fired.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re targeting the organs of the state: police stations, hospitals, etc.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Every Single Time

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Yes, it’s amazing how they managed to conquer all those countries one by one.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are the government. The capital is theirs, and they act as the state.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I mean what do you except? Tommy is an ex convict and a petty criminal and fraudster. And He claims he is jewish.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
he went full jew slave. Bet he is circumcised too like a good slave.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Trump went full retard

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Hi Chief. I understand why people follow Tommy Robinson, jews are putting tens of millions of Pounds behind him and he has a large organization and social media boost. Essentially he has hundreds of liars on the payroll.

Chief Moody
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
That is true. lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Tommy’s been on a coke bender since October 7. I’m not sure he’s slept for three years.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Roosevelt imploring him to use nuclear weapons against Germany but the letter sat on Roosevelt’s desk because Roosevelt has died overnight.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Andinia Plan

Chief Moody
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson and co have been very ghoulish over Iran. How people still support them, I’ll never understand.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Israelis are colonising Patagonia right now.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Japan had already offered surrender 3 times. They still nuked ’em

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real, Natty. Israeli journalists are happy to talk about it.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real. They talk about it in Hebrew media.

Chief Moody
9 days ago
It’s very blatant what Israel are doing with Iran. It’s shameless at this point.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being desribed as America’s streetwalker is like getting pimped out by a literal whore

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Well that actually happens once an opportunistic whore ages – she becomes a pimp.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Well, there is no planning for this war. The war aims change hour to hour, and Iraq was extremely well-organised.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It’s always demoralizing to see conservative patriots in America viewing our country’s greatest ambition as being Israel’s bitch

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Yeah they just don’t care. What will the goyim do? Nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“The Dossier”. At least they had that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Farage has been absolutely hysterical over this. “We have angered the Americans!”

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
9-11 made the anti-war position more difficult back then.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Not me. The state of most young fatties, they won’t even make it to a hospice

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Has anyone else seen Asmongolds blatant warmongering?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Once the Bush administration got away with lying about Sadam and terrorism ties and a complete fabrication of weapons of mass destruction, it was GAME OVER for government accountability.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers using their final breaths to comment from their hospice beds.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Plenty of young folk think that way too sadly

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
100%. GenX is largely Boomer 2.0

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Bahraini government is illegitimate, and delusional. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government falls during this conflict. The Bahraini people stand with Iran, by and large.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
There was a Yemeni calling in to a Bahrain TV show and the Bahrain TV host said there is no war in Bahrain

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Bibi WhataYahoo

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Netanyahu has such contempt for the goyim. The fact that he thinks Americans are stupid is becoming very obvious. A rational person wouldn’t buy a used car from him.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
The israelis and the the jew controlled countries hiding a damage.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@utopia148800
that’s what I meant ha ha

MarcoEire
9 days ago
All true, I wish we weren’t inundated with ai slop of Tel Aviv

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
jews and degenerates; European America is in the past.

Natty
9 days ago

@noreplacement
it only looks that way

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
The absolute state of the USA…

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Winged Lawnmowers from Hell

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I just want to see Tel Aviv flattened.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It is difficult to find any Iranian fight back video. It all looks one way success for the Epstein coalition

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The UAE is cracking down on videos; Bahrain has banned street gatherings; the jews are cracking down on footage of Tel Aviv. The true extent of this madness won’t be cleat until the dust – or sand – settles.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s hard to be circumspect, but it’s best to be cautious and not get one’s hopes up.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
haha you do it than.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Yuro needs a wedgie tbh

MarcoEire
9 days ago
PURIM FEST 26

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Evening volks!

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Excellent Germanicus

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s karma for Mark being very mean to Sam last stream!

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Greetings fellow Social Nationalists

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
\o

Esau rising
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
o/

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Natty

Natty
9 days ago
thats good lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Greetings war-weary goyim.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein regime

@vengeance
9 days ago
o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 17th of July, 2025. We had some bizarre technical nonsense going on for some reason, but we got the stream happening. We’re here we have Tom back. First time since Australia Day. We’ve got three of us back together. He’s finally off the ridiculous bail conditions. The South Australian police finally dropped the ridiculous charge of loitering from Australia Day, which I’m sure a lot of you are familiar with the events of that day. But it’s good to have you back, Tom.

 

How do you feel? I mean, I feel personally vindicated. I felt vindicated already considering all the other charges that were dropped. But this really cements the vindication that not just that we didn’t do anything wrong, we knew we didn’t do anything wrong, but that we made the right decision on the day to expose the tyranny. People were saying:

 

“Oh, how does going to jail, going to save the White race?”

 

Well, guess what, we’re not going to jail. Not for this anyway. [chuckling] Jury’s still out whether we go to jail for some other reason, but not for this.

 

So how are you feeling?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think vindicated is the right word. It is a victory in the sense that we have shown the Australian people that through strength and persistence and resilience, we can get our message across. We can suffer without being humiliated.

 

And I think that’s important that Australians need to hear that. Currently we’re being humiliated as a people. The White Australian population is being obviously replaced and it is being humiliated while it’s being replaced. And if we stand up against this tyranny, they will make us suffer.

 

And I think through our strength, we’ve made it clear that suffering is more valuable than just living a peaceful life that’s ultimately humiliating.

 

So that’s how I feel strength. I feel strong. I feel that our strength and our resilience has proven us right.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point because you are naturally adapting to the kind of harassment tactics used to try to prevent you guys from doing what you’re trying to do, whether it’s activism or building the political party. And you do seem to have done or made a great deal of progress in the realm of adaptation. Because I’ll make the point, this basically panned out exactly as you said it would. You said you’re going to cop a beating on the day. You predicted there would be bullshit charges that wouldn’t stick and that have to drop eventually. And now that’s exactly what happened.

 

So not only are you adapting in terms of strategy, but you now know what to expect. As though the system has basically used all its cards and they can only keep doing the same thing they’ve always done. And you keep getting better at dealing with it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And so much has changed for our organisation in terms of support from the public over the last six months. And I mean, what’s been really incredible is, and I don’t want this taken the wrong way, but we have had a lot of people that are former members of the Liberal Party reach out to us and say that one of the reasons why they have left the party and have started to donate to our cause and started to support our cause is because they can see, based off the election and the Liberal Party moving further to the Left and based off how we were treated by the system in Adelaide, which is, I think it’s a pretty strong liberal kind of state. I mean, Adelaide’s pretty churchy and has a lot of Christians in it and it’s got quite a conservative movement.

 

But this is how, you know, probably one of the more conservative states in the country, other than, I guess, Queensland. This is how they treat political dissidents on the Right. And that for them was the straw that broke the camel’s back. And their reason for supporting us going forward.

 

So it’s interesting that even in persecution, you can gain support and a following and assistance from people that have spent their whole life in mainstream politics. So I didn’t expect that. I didn’t predict that. I did predict that the Australian public in general would be more supportive of us, but I didn’t expect so many people would be jumping ship from the previous conservative faction of the Liberal Party.

 

The last thing I heard from our insiders within the Liberal Party is that about 50% of the members have left in the last two years.

 

And I’m not saying all of those have jumped across to us, but a significant portion of particular branches and seats have come across to show their support for us. So that’s good to see.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big number.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a good moment actually. I will say join the movement! Join the prospective political party White Australia.org. I do a bad job of remembering to shill this every week, so I’m just going to say it now while I’m thinking of it. If you’re in Australia, I put out a poll on Twitter a few days. Sorry, on Telegram a few days ago. The poll was, if you’re a White nationalist, how many times have you met up with other White Nationalists, at least one other White nationalist in real life this year to discuss politics or do anything political?

 

Very low bar. 57% of respondents said zero times. That’s crazy! So, like more than half of the Joel Davis spurg Telegram following can’t even meet up once with one White nationalist in real life since the beginning of this year. So I understand a lot of my followers are in other countries and whatever. But that’s a horrible statistic!

 

So if that’s you and you live in Australia, you have no excuse, like our country is being stolen from us. White Australia.org, sign up as a supporter. Maybe you don’t want to come and march in the street dressed in black and you know, get arrested, but you can at the very least join up as a supporter and help us found a political party to represent you and your beliefs, which obviously, if you’re watching this, unless you’re one of the assigned police officers or intelligence agents or journalists watching this, you share our beliefs.

 

So who else is going to represent them? No one except us! So sign up White Australia.org. Be part of the solution!

 

[06:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom, what happened in your latest court appearance and what does that mean for you going forward?

 

Thomas Sewell: So today we had, I think, the third or fourth case conference, which is where the prosecution says they’re not ready to go to trial and they want to have a little bit more time to prepare. And they dragged us out for as many as they could, as many case conferences as they could, until eventually they had to drop the charges. Today the last charge I had was the loitering charge, which was the alleged reason for my arrest outside the Anzac Memorial in Adelaide on, I think it’s called North Terrace. I think the street, very beautiful part of Adelaide. We picked that area on purpose because of how beautiful it was.

 

And obviously I was arrested as I began giving a speech about how the South Australian police are corrupt and are serving traitor politicians.

 

So the whole purpose, the whole meaning or reason for the arrest was dropped and that was done very quickly. And then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that the primary purpose for the arrest? Loitering? Is that what they tried to sell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then when I was arrested and taken back to the police station for allegedly loitering, they said that I’m being charged with loitering, resisting arrest and Nazi symbols.

 

And then when I got my paperwork, it just had loitering and Nazi symbols.

 

And then about six weeks ago, the Nazi symbols charge got dropped, which was the Union Jack and NSN patch on our shoulders.

 

And then obviously today they dropped loitering. But they put on a new charge today, which they hadn’t sent any information about to the magistrate or to my lawyer. And they have charged me with breaching the bail conditions for the loitering charge.

 

So I was under non-Association for loitering. And they’re saying, they’re suggesting, they’re alleging that I breached at some point over the last six months, I associated, they’re alleging, with people in our community.

 

So they’ve dropped the bail conditions because they were attached to the loitering. But there is another court date again for breach of bail.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re accusing you of breaching bail on a charge that they’ve dropped?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. And I asked the judge that question. I said:

 

“How can someone be charged with breaching bail conditions that were put on me that have now been dropped? Like if I didn’t commit the crime, why was the bail conditions even put on me? And therefore, how could I be charged breaching bail conditions that are put on me falsely?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It would make sense that the conditions imposed during the bail period are now void because it’s been found that there was no evidence to uphold the original charge in the first place.

 

Thomas Sewell: That would make sense, wouldn’t it? That’s common sense. But that’s not, unfortunately, how the magistrate saw it.

 

And instead of answering my question, he instead told me that I was being represented and wasn’t allowed to talk. And I told him to:

 

“Answer my question, buddy!”

 

Blair Cottrell: He wouldn’t have liked that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because these people don’t deserve any respect. They are absolutely disgusting, corrupt thugs, that think that they can lock Australians up for, in the case of Stephen Wells, 4 months, over 100 days in solitary confinement for charges that were dropped. And they think that they deserve some sort of respect or honour for their disgusting, corrupt behaviour! It’s absolutely putrid! The Australian people should be, it’s absolutely abhorrent what the political class, what the ruling class are putting Australians through.

 

And when I called him, “buddy”, he threatened to have me removed from the call. And I just said:

 

“Okay, well then remove me. Like, you’re nothing, but you’re all corrupt, basically. And I want the record to show that you’re all corrupt.”

 

And then they just booted me from my own court case.

 

So they could have just put me on mute, but instead they just booted me for my own court case.

 

So that’s pretty funny. But they’re just disgusting! I hate them! I absolutely hate them! They’re absolutely disgusting! The prosecutors are professional liars! They put so many good men in prison over nothing. Over nothing! And all the charges have been dropped, except I think Joel’s belt, his [eagle] belt buckle, and one other guy still hasn’t had his loitering charge dropped yet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, before you ask your question, Joel, if they are so corrupt, I’m assuming you mean the magistrate is corrupt as well?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, all of them. The original magistrate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, why participate in the process? Like, have you got a plan? What’s the end goal? If they’re so corrupt, like, why answer their summons?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, if you don’t, you eventually get shot!

 

So I’m not looking to get shot at this stage by the police. Ultimately, you have to play the game. You have to abide by the law at all times, only break it to seize power. I think that was Julius Caesar that said that. He also said, Julius Caesar said:

 

“We must endure pain with patience!”

 

And I feel that every day we have to endure this pain with patience. And we’ve been doing that for some time now. And we’re going to keep enduring pain until we take power. And when we take power, then we’ll reassess the laws.

 

[12:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: I can imagine you’re probably holding out for maybe some High Court judges that maybe aren’t corrupt, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s a separate issue. So what we are looking to do is bundle all this stuff together with our High Court case, which I think you and Joel have covered a fair bit on the stream. I won’t go into too much detail, but, yes, we are still following through with two plans. One, appealing all the current criminal charges against us regarding Nazi symbols and gestures and any sort of attempt to stop our political communication.

 

And also we are looking to privately sue the police for their behaviour, their unlawful and unconstitutional behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think old Stephen Wells might have a role to play in that, because I can’t believe that guy spent, how long was it? Nearly four months. Three months. Four months in jail over a loitering charge that was then dropped just because he was trying to celebrate Australia Day publicly. I’ve never heard of anything close to that in Australian activism.

 

Joel Davis: According to High Court precedent, Stephen Wells has standing to go to the High Court and challenge the Constitutionality of what was done to him, of the acts that he was charged under. Because even though the charges were dropped, he did serve time. And particularly because they didn’t just charge him with loitering. Originally they did, but then when they realised that they’d have to release him after three months because it has a maximum sentence of three months. They then slapped a Nazi symbol charge on him in order to enable them to extend his stay in prison basically beyond the three month mark.

 

So he has standing to challenge that law at the High Court now because there’s been plenty of precedent established in High Court decisions that you don’t have to be being actively prosecuted under a particular law. You only need to have standing to go to the High Court. You just simply need to have suffered as a result of that law, that potentially unconstitutional law, and have reason to suspect that it could be applied to you again in the future. Now the Nazi symbol charge related to literally the symbol of our organisation or the NSN at the very least.

 

And so if you’re a member of the NSN, basically what they’re trying to say is that you could get arrested and thrown in prison for displaying our logo in public.

 

So it’s a political organisation. It seems like a pretty clear cut and dry constitutional issue.

 

So that’s what’s interesting that they’ve kind of facilitated Stephen potentially to go to the High Court. Also. Stephen Wells is up for a very handsome compensation payout. And so I think Stephen Wells will get paid very well for his four months. And Stephen Wells, the upstanding character that he is, he was saying to me today that:

 

“I want to sue these cunts, get as much money out of them as possible and then put that money away. So the next time someone gets arrested, they’ve got money to support them like the people who supported me.”

 

So he’s already like looking to be altruistic and pay it forward rather than just, I don’t know, sit on the cash, which he’s entitled to. So top bloke Stephen Wells! But it’s, I think he’s quite happy to do four months in prison and have a kind of epic story that inspires people and then go and collect money from ZOG and put it in the White Australia kitty, and so on. And now we’ve got standing to go to the High Court as I said.

 

So realistically we’ve taken a lot of wins here for not much suffering. I mean he had to suffer in prison. But the rest of us, we didn’t really need to suffer like we had minor inconveniences basically that we had to suffer. But the positive outcome from all of this has been to I think win a lot of sympathy in the public and gain a bit of legal leverage that we can now use.

 

Because when we set up this political party, obviously we’re contesting elections and it’s probably not going to be realistic that we’re going to go in and win government at the first election that we contest. Right? So we need something to do other than just march around and declare what we believe and try and get someone to vote for us.

 

And so these legal cases, not just these ones, but probably, I anticipate once we form the political party, there could be other High Court cases where they’re trying to take guns away from people who associate with us. We’re probably going to have to go to the High Court to try and protect their gun rights. There’s going to be stuff to do with the de-banking. Tom was saying he was intending on taking to the High Court. Then also, if we register our political party and then we have accounts on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and so on, and they try to de-platform us, were currently de-platformed from these websites, well, then we’ve also got standing to go to the High Court and say these companies are basically impairing representative democracy, which is unconstitutional. They’re impairing our right to political communication. As a registered political party in Australia, how can Australians have a representative democracy if their own political parties can’t even communicate to the voters what their policies are? So we’d have a very strong case there.

 

I think that would have a lot of sympathy in the community because there’s so much push in the state at every level to increase censorship on the Internet. And this could be one of the only ways really to strike back without taking power and reversing all these laws and getting rid of the eSafety Commission and all this garbage, would be to try and get to the High Court and get a decision that would establish precedent that would limit state overreach and the overreach of these big tech companies.

 

So these legal battles are going to be very important for us going forward and if we can have some successes or at least, you know, stand up sympathetically for our rights as Australians, could be a great way to also raise a lot of support for the party and the movement in general to see that we’re trying to engage in productive battles to defend the rights and freedoms of Australians, even outside of political power.

 

[18:28]

 

Blair Cottrell: If I’m understanding correctly, Tom, you’re now a free man, limited by no legal conditions of association. You can now train with the boys, you can associate with who you want. I’m imagining this because you’re on the stream with us for the first time in a while. The reason you haven’t been able to jump onto the stream with Joel or I, or with Joel specifically, is because he’s a member of your organisation. Am I right in believing this? You’re a free man now? Well to some extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Relatively, yeah. I’m not currently having my political communication suppressed by the Magistrates Court, but I do still have three pending court cases regarding other matters that are, like including the so-called offensive behaviour in Ballarat. Doing a political demonstration in Ballarat. Jacob Hersant’s also been charged with offensive behaviour for a rally he did in Melbourne CBD So those two rallies, both rally leaders or rally spokespersons, like the speakers of both those rallies have been charged. Myself and Jacob. Joel, have you been charged yet with offensive behaviour?

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re still investigating me for the jews Hate Freedom rally. But they’ve got 12 months, so they can basically, … They’re also investigating me for offensive behaviour also for when we had the boys, my rabbi friends, and we went down and endorsed the Liberal Party at the last election. And yeah, so we’ll see if they end up charging me on those, but we don’t know yet.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so another tactic they’re using, Blair, is they’re confusing political speech with like public misconduct.

 

So they’re trying to use laws that stop you from mooning a police officer or something silly like that. Or I think it’s like really bad swearing or something like that. They’re trying to use these laws to prevent political communication. The same way in Adelaide they tried to use loitering as a law to stop us from politically communicating.

 

But yeah, so I’m on bail for those and I have trials upcoming this year for those cases. But yeah, I’m allowed to associate at this stage. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I watch updates on Australian like motorcycle clubs sometimes just like Crime Updates, news on YouTube. It’s just a side interest of mine and I can’t help but notice that I think they’re trying to treat you guys the same way they treat some of these so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs. Because in Australia, if you don’t know, we have bikie gangs. In Queensland specifically, I’m pretty sure there’s strong legislation making it very difficult for those gangs to operate. I’m pretty sure you can’t even have a gang or MC club logo or insignia. Like you can’t even display it publicly. Or even have it in your house. If they know you’ve got it, they’ll raid you and take your jumper because it has a club logo on it.

 

And I’m just noticing similarities between the way the police treat you guys down here. It’s like they want you to be an outlaw gang and they expect to be able to get away with treating a political organisation which in the near future will be a registered political party, like they’re an outlaw gang. And I don’t think that’s going to fly. There’s no precedent in Australian legal history where that’s being tolerated by serious levels of court.

 

Of course, magistrates levels of court seem to tolerate whatever they’re told to tolerate. But I think once you get to county and beyond, you’ll probably see some judges and some outcomes that are more favourable to what is fair and actually legally applicable for you guys.

 

So, yeah, I’m glad you’re out! Well out of the conditions that were binding you and I’m glad you’re able to join us again.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s going to be the main thing on our agenda? What are we going to go on with lads?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the big thing to discuss this week in international politics is the way that Trump is trying to really unsuccessfully sweep the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing under the rug. I mean, obviously the cover-up has been successful. They’ve managed to, well first the FBI and the Attorney General of the United States came out last week and said:

 

“Oh, the Epstein files, they don’t actually don’t exist. We’ve concluded our investigation and they don’t exist!”

 

Just tried to gaslight everyone. And obviously the reaction from just everyone in the world basically was:

 

“What do you mean they don’t exist?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, explain to me, Joel, explain to me. And for the audience, to make it simple, what are the Epstein files? What do they consist of? Is it a list of clients that were in a prostitution ring? Because that’s my understanding. Is that right?

 

[23:23]

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure the files contain a lot more than just that.

 

But obviously the files would contain names of who’s going there and there’s been all these allegations that potentially these people are named and those people like Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew and blah, blah, blah, and photos of different elites and that were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and so on, and people going to the island, the flight logs, the so-called Lolita Express that was taking all these people out to this private island in the Caribbean. But obviously we don’t know what’s in the files because the files have not been released. Right.

 

But there was a promise before the last election that if Trump was to win, the files would be released, which no one intelligent believed. But even like Donald Trump Jr. was saying:

 

“Release the files!”

 

You know, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And now they’re saying there are no files. Is that right

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re not actually saying that now. Now they said that. And then a few days later, Trump changed the narrative to, not there are no files, to:

 

“Well, the Democrats they’ve concocted fake documents!”

 

And the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing apparently is a Democrat op, just like the Steele dossier and blah, blah, blah. And:

 

“It’s a hoax and it’s a political witch hunt and all this stuff trying to undermine me!”

 

He’s trying to spin it like this. But it’s ridiculous!

 

Number one, because Jeffrey Epstein committed, quote, unquote, “suicide”. You know, no one really believes that he killed himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah, I heard the footage that they had of him in jail. Someone ran it through a metadata analysis and found that it had been edited several times. They could even tell the programme it was edited with. So the stuff that they released or had regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide has all been doctored and edited. That’s not the real footage of his so-called suicide.

 

Joel Davis: Well, also, when that occurred he was under the Attorney General of the United States was Bill Barr. Bill Barr’s father, by the way, employed Jeffrey Epstein a long time ago and they have long, deep family connections to one another. Bill Barr was made Attorney General of the United States by Trump. He was in the Trump administration and he was the one running the Department of Justice who had Jeffrey Epstein incarcerated.

 

So it was under his watch that Jeffrey Epstein was killed and it was under his watch that it wasn’t investigated and that it was covered up.

 

So the Trump administration covered this up to begin with. Also, Donald Trump himself was friends with Jeffrey Epstein from the 1980s onwards. They allegedly, their friendship allegedly broke down in the 2000s because they had a dispute like Trump bought some condo in Palm beach in Florida that Jeffrey Epstein wanted to buy and they had some dispute. But they were very close friends. There’s lots of video footage showing this and Jeffrey Epstein even described Donald Trump as his “best friend” at one point in the 1990s.

 

So that’s obviously very important to bring up.

 

And also there’s plenty of people in the Trump administration or around Trump, like Trump’s Lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is a jew and who was one of the main lawyers working on the whole election fraud, so-called lawsuits and so on after the 2020 election. He was also Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyer and apparently went to the island and so on. There’s just so many connections between Trump and Epstein and Trump’s original administration and associates and Jeffrey Epstein. The list just goes on. We could do a whole stream just detailing all this stuff. So move forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of Democrats that are implicated in this too, like the Clintons and so on. So the Democrats aren’t going to release the files. The Democrats aren’t going to hold people to account for what’s happened here either.

 

But Trump is saying because the Democrats were sitting on the files over the last four years, magically they’ve changed them all and he doesn’t want to release them because apparently he’s basically admitting guilt that he’s in the files.

 

Elon Musk came out a few weeks ago and said they’re not being released because Trump’s in the files. Put the pressure on Trump after they fell out. And the pressure is telling, because now while Trump is every day coming out saying:

 

“No one cares about Jeffrey Epstein, everyone needs to stop talking about it.”

 

And so on. We’re seeing more and more elements of his base, of his movement turning on him. Tucker Carlson is giving speeches.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I turn on my YouTube. I don’t even watch stuff in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. I know almost nothing about it. I know what most people would know that is that there is some sort of list or documents implicating people in very unethical activities, probably for the purposes of Israeli blackmail and influence over American politicians. That’s what I know. And I turn on my YouTube and all throughout my recommended videos is people that usually do streams on video games or conspiracies who don’t even usually talk about this stuff, like doing videos on this stuff. So it’s just across the board. Have you seen much of it?

 

Joel Davis: I saw an opinion poll by the way of Americans:

 

“And do you agree with how Trump is handling the Jeffrey Epstein case?”

 

And it was like 12% said yes. So he’s lost everyone. Like no one’s going along with this shit! But go ahead Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t have anything to add on the Epstein thing. It’s obviously been covered. It’s my only observation, …

 

[28:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you agree that it kind of feels really drawn out. It’s almost like I’m sick of hearing it. It’s like it’s been going on for so long and nothing’s ever come of it. Maybe they’re trying to create that feeling, just kind of make people feel fatigued.

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. I think that it’s a weapon that both sides have used against each other.

 

So when the Democrats were in power with Biden, they had the Biden laptop scandal and they had obviously a lot of people in the Democrat Party were connected to Epstein and other people that were on the Lolita Express. A lot of a list celebrities are Democrats and they were all on the list.

 

And then now that Trump’s in power being, you know, turned back on Trump obviously photos way back in the day, like before the 2020 election came out that showed Trump as friends with Epstein and Trump making comments about how Epstein’s got a particular taste in younger women. And Trump was saying that he kind of agreed with it. It was a bit incriminating. You know, if you were Italian, there’d be plausible deniability that you’re talking about 18 year olds or something. Anyway, I digress.

 

I think that it’s interesting to see a mega civil war or MAGA civil war, however you want to pronounce it. I think it’s good to see that there are these kind of Qtard, you know, conspiracy theorist, you know, MAGAs or Make America Great Again camp that all of a sudden are telling people to move on from a legitimate conspiracies, a legitimate Mossad blackmail entrapment scheme. Because they always want you to focus on conspiracy theories, but just not the ones that are real. They want you to focus on nonsense and talk about Antarctic, well, not necessarily nonsense, but they want to talk you about side quest things like Antarctica and 5G and stuff like that.

 

But then this is just black and white! This is an Israeli Mossad blackmail scheme. It’s undeniable, it’s a fact. And these people want us to brush it under the table.

 

And it just shows that, yeah, the MAGA camp is dead. It ties in good timing as well with obviously the tension between, you know, Musk, who’s a power broker in the US and Donald Trump. And so seeing the MAGA camp fall apart is a good thing. It’s a good thing. And it’s a good thing for the same reason why we’ve worked so hard to destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia, successfully destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia.

 

Americans need a form of Right-wing, pro-White politics that is superior to Make America Great Again. They need a much harder and more staunch, more ideologically consistent. It’s not just a kind of cult of personality around Donald Trump. So I’m watching, I’m watching along.

 

Joel Davis: What was very interesting this week was Tucker Carlson gave a speech at the Turning Point USA event where he basically said Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent. And this is being swept under the rug. How come Israel can blackmail our politicians with sexual blackmail, with a paedophile ring, and there’s a conspiracy on both sides of politics to cover it up:

 

“How is this acceptable?”

 

And the crowd was going ballistic at this conservative event. At Charlie Kirk’s Hail Israel Hail ZOG conservative event. The crowd’s still going ballistic.

 

So there’s been a sea change where conservative political discourse in the United States has become dominated by dissident Right talking points ideas. And the younger generation of Right-wingers in the United States and I think everywhere are turning against the jews, against Israel. They’re more radical on racial issues. And Tucker Carlson coming out and doing that, basically he just pissed in Trump’s face. And then Trump came out this few days ago and said:

 

“Well, anyone who wants to talk about Epstein, I don’t want their support. They’re fake supporters and we’re done with them.”

 

So what is he saying? He doesn’t want Tucker Carlson support, doesn’t want the support of Matt Walsh. I saw Matt Walsh come out and criticise Trump on the same grounds. Like so many of these really big, like massive following influential conservative commentators that come out on the side of the people against Trump.

 

And so what this is the foundation of a new American Right, in my opinion, that moves beyond Trump, that embraces more radical talking points. And it seems like Elon Musk is willing to fund these guys too.

 

So it’s shaping up to be quite interesting to see how this develops over the next couple years because a lot of people thought after the last election, Peter Thiel got his J.D. Vance, you know, curry burner, vice president installed. And Trump will just basically bamboozle all the Boomers and all the masses with his charisma and his policies and everyone will de-radicalise and then JD Vance will end up just being the heir to the throne and then he’ll become president and they’ll just hold this paradigm of politics down on lock for the next decade and we’re just going to have to eat the slop.

 

Well, actually, I don’t think so. actually, this has completely blown things up and now it seems like a more radical challenger could emerge to take the throne off The Prince.

 

So it’s quite interesting to observe.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you guys think about, because you mentioned Tucker Carlson. What do you guys think about Tucker Carlson? What’s his game? Because his message has become more explicit in the last year or so. and where does he stand? Do you trust him?

 

[35:03]

 

Thomas Sewell: No! [chuckling] I don’t trust him.

 

But it’s an improvement of controlled opposition, certainly. If the controlled opposition has to continue moving further and further to our direction, well, eventually they’ll have to run a controlled opposition which is just a copy of us.

 

And I think people will choose the real us over the controlled opposition copy of us, when it gets to that point.

 

So, yeah, it’s a good to see, it’s very good to see the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Battle there is to continue existing. Yeah, because they won’t want you to exist. Right. But if he’s controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, who’s controlling him, do you think? What are your theories?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I think he’s in the CIA. Yeah, I think he’s in the CIA.

 

So I think he’s part of a different faction within the Deep State. And I think Trump was an independent person that was being influenced by different factions within the CIA.

 

And I think that perhaps they’re jumping ship from Trump. I don’t think that Tucker Carlson is entirely aligned with Musk, for example. I think he’s kind of like a fourth party when you think about it. I don’t know too much about Democrat politics, but I think the Right-wing is moving in an odd direction where there’s the Trump camp, there’s the Musk camp, and there’s the, what you could call like the Tucker camp. And I think those are the three most powerful forces in the American Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: I expect you have your reasons for believing that. There’s probably plenty of information that suggests that. I haven’t personally looked into it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: His father was a CIA agent. That’s confirmed. And then Tucker himself said that he wanted to join the CIA in the 1990s when he finished college, but he didn’t make the grade, apparently. He didn’t get the contract. So then he decided to become a journalist. But that seems, I don’t know [chuckling] if I believe that story.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit, because the CIA are desperate for recruits, and especially recruits with a high IQ, which he has. And it’s a fact that the CIA hires thousands and thousands of journalists a year. Hires people to become journalists.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s something called Operation Mockingbird. Google it. Yeah. If you don’t know what it is.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, it’s slightly different, but it’s on the same talking point. You know, the Director General of ASIO only two or three years ago came out in a Senate inquiry and said that:

 

“They employ journalists, that they could be a journalist, they could be a teacher, they could be whatever, and they’re actually secretly an ASIO agent. We’re everywhere, basically.”

 

And in the case of journalism, it’s very important to have intelligence services control journalism. That’s probably the key industry for intelligence services to control.

 

Joel Davis: Also, if you want to understand Tucker Carlson’s motivations, I think the motivations could be understood if he is like a CIA operative or at least connected to the Deep State, is geopolitical.

 

So what does Tucker Carlson basically do with his influence? He plays down the whole Russia thing, criticises Zelensky, criticises funding the war in Ukraine. Now he’s criticising Israel and the involvement with Israel.

 

But he’s also always been a China hawk who has been very consistent that China is the real threat. America needs to focus on fighting China. And there’s other elements in the Trump administration and across the American Right who have that view. Elbridge Colby, who’s the Undersecretary of Defense, he’s been saying that for years, and now he’s the Under Secretary of Defense. He just came out the other day demanding that Australia and Japan commit to fighting alongside the United States if Taiwan is invaded, to give you an idea of what he’s all about. And he’s also the main guy in the Trump administration trying to block assistance to Ukraine and so on, because he thinks it’s taking away from a deterrent and potential action against China in vis a vis Taiwan.

 

So Tucker Carlson comes along and he can kind of wrangle the Crown by pushing this kind of anti-Ukraine, anti-Israel, which are both very popular with conservatives Angles in order to kind of push for a war with China or China, Hawking, at the very least, in addition to having a very kind of patriotic, you know, style and so on. You can see why the CIA would look upon him as someone or look upon that style of politics as something that they would support because they would see it maybe as in the geopolitical interests of the United States. And that’s what the CIA is fundamentally like. It’s fundamental reason for existing is basically keeping America the global hegemon.

 

Blair Cottrell: For our American viewers, I know we’ve had Thomas Rousseau on the show, leader of Patriot Front. Is he the primary guy, organisation, political faction or personality you guys would endorse in America? Is there someone else? Is he the main man? I mean, who’s the real deal?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Thomas is, and Patriot Front is the most organised and they are the largest White nationalist group in the United States. They hold their cards a little bit closer to their chest than us in terms of their ideology. They keep things a little bit more “heritage American”, as they say. And that’s their strategy. It’s kind of like a halfway point between what we’re doing and the United Patriots Front, obviously, without UPF being a purely anti-Islam movement, it being a Patriot Front. So it, yeah, it’s definitely a specific tactic that he’s using and he’s done quite well with it. And they continue to grow.

 

There are a lot of other organisations. The Rob Rundo active club model was quite large and it’s all across the country. So their groupings are a lot smaller. You know, you’re talking usually five to ten guys at a time, but there are hundreds of groups of five to 10 guys.

 

And then you have Hammer, doing Blood Tribe. So we get accused of being wignats, but we’re pretty light on the wignatory compared to particular people in America.

 

And you’ve got all sorts of groups. You’ve got Wagner’s group, you’ve got Volkers Resistance Movement, you’ve got, … There’s a lot of groups in the United States. It’s very different to Australia in that sense. We’ve kind of co-ordinated all of the White nationalist energy all into one body, which has its pros and cons.

 

But in the United States, I think Patriot Front probably control 30 or 40% of the market, if you want to put it that way. But they certainly have over 90% of the visibility. What they’ve done very well is they’ve got the majority of the visibility.

 

[42:03]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:38:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/24/2025 = 33)

Blitz007
6 days ago
these people are great and we need more of em
18 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
6 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
12 likes

Report
Strueth
6 days ago
Thanks guys, I love listening to your chats… I don’t feel so alone in our country knowing you have our backs and are willing to stand up for our white Australia… I long for how it was in the 70’s… we had it all, and slowly it’s been taken right out from under us, betrayed by those wimps in parliament… Thank you
9 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
The fuckery really kicked off with Whitlam. Constitutional vandalism which needs to be addressed. That was when the gloves came off with Vietnamese immigration and demoralising ‘liberal’ law pushes. We were ruled by TV and under the oogabooga blues spell.
2 likes

Report
StevenGurr
6 days ago
Absolute total bullshit Sick of these cunt pigs and courts. Loitering isn’t even an arrestable offence and then to continue adding simple offences is a joke. And further to add non association conditions on the bail is totalitarian shit. Keep up the fight and go after every individual pig, judge and state lawyer involved.
5 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
6 days ago
Hey! The Three Amigos!
2 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
6 days ago
88 .
1 like

Report
mharrison52
6 days ago
rome, pheonixian, ancient arayans in India. Mexica, Brazil, All of central and south america. America and Candada now. every great white civilization has ended the same way mongrolzation then conplete collapse. It’s a trend about whites that we cant afford to mistake again. in aglobal society there are no where to go. global genocide.
1 like

Report
Sieger88
6 days ago
Unfortunately Aston Martin is now owned by the kíke Strulović
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
paceytarzan
6 days ago
Sieg
0 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
6 days ago
Luxury and comfort made the yankees soft. There’s not much of a White working class in the USA. Most working class are Amerindian and African. Go into a boxing gym in the USA and there’s not a single White person. Completely reversed from Britain and Ireland. American families the mother is usually the boss and dad has been cucked to a little muted nub.
0 likes

Report
KeithyFM
5 days ago
Turks and Greeks… chalk n cheese. Turks should be back in Turkmenistan.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
5 days ago
The mustache without the beard looks goofy with the shaved head.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Yes there are young women that have resisted the feminist conditioning, 5 of them are my daughters… and I’m so proud.
0 likes

Report
deputydawg000
4 days ago
CritalEyeMMA on youtube and AntiwokeMMA on rumble is also worth a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz_LOvsbMiM https://rumble.com/v6w0l5s-livestream-one-year-anniversary.-its-the-jews.-race-realism-live-stream.html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
0 likes

Report
Orangejoos
4 days ago
Very pragmatic , and informed discussion . Always appreciate the three of you. I’m only informed by Nick otherwise , the rest is almost entirely bullshit or toxic. Thanks — for all you hero’s do.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
3 days ago
I think that you have had to do something blackmailable in order to be able to do business at the highest level and to join the club. When everyone in that circle has something on everyone else, there would be a certain kind of mutual insurance when it comes to the threat of exposure.
0 likes

Report
empowerprivate
2 days ago
Rabbis, when they are sucking blood out, it’s Adrenochrome.
0 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
19 hours ago
Gotta get Jacob on more
0 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – MechaHitler – a Manifestation of Musk’s Machiavellianism, or Something More? – Jul 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/17/joel-davis-mechahitler-a-manifestation-of-musks-machiavellianism-or-something-more-jul-11-2025-transcript/
-1 like

Delete
mharrison52
6 days ago
aTom has Aura like an Anglo Addy
-1 like

Report
hueyvam123
6 days ago
The best. Great to see the gang back together again.
-1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
5 days ago
No hate but is Joel rocking a comb over?
-1 like

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
5 days ago

-1 like

Report
whitehonkymonkey
5 days ago
hello lads,good to see the crew back together. though it feels like a win with the courts,its all about getting rid of us on the day. they don’t give a f… about the arrests not sticking ,as long as they pull you off the street on the day. your tactics also need to create distractions when out protesting. create confusion. keep it up lads.
-1 like

Report
BasedNapoleon
5 days ago
Just watched ‘Latham at Large’ where Mark Latham featured as a guest journalist on 60 minutes covering the 2010 election between Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard. He deconstructed the campaign process and pressed Abbott about migration.
-1 like

Report
UncircumcisedCircus
5 days ago
I do think there is a waspy faction of the CIA that doesnt want to always take orders from the Mossad.
-1 like

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair, all it takes is an accusation. Ironic since you were accused of stalking by a woman who was stalking you. It’s not uncommon for the perpetrator to call the police first in order to allay suspicion off from themself. I was in a holding cell with a middle aged white engineer who had a knife pulled on him by his neighbor. The neighbor called the cops first & got the engineer arrested.
-1 like

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Great stream guys, thanks
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Would love to meet white nationalists in my area but can’t find any in my state.
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Also when dating a woman, hell or just interacting with anyone in general. I personally record it on my GoPro, yeah it’s a tad bit weird some people don’t understand, but you never know what will happen, especially with women.
-1 like

Report
Makulatoren
VerifiedSupporter+
4 days ago
I disagree with Thomas about Tucker Carlson. The CIA would never betray the mossad in that way of having matyr made on. Because then they would lose their Epstein tickets. Tucker is just acting like the average boomer. He wants to back to the american ideal but knows deep down that it was fake. Yet he still yerns for it.
-1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Hello, welcome to the stream. Another show this evening, The Joel and Blair Show. It is the 6th of the 6th! Ominous! 6th of June, 2025. Big show for you tonight. A lot to discuss. A lot’s going on. We’re going to be talking about the N-word. We’re going to be talking about all kinds of things on the show this evening. The question is where to begin.

 

Also, we’re streaming live on Comfies on Comfy Friends X channel. So we lost quite a few viewers when we got banned from X. So it’s nice to be back on X. Nice to have another platform back open to the show. So hello to all the viewers on X. Strap in. Should be a good show this evening.

 

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking cold down here in Melbourne. I got the heater going. I’m pretty cosy. But how you feeling, Blair? You like the cold weather? I actually don’t mind the cold weather. It’s kind of spiritually centreing. But I know you love it because the summer, it just irritates you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, I’m always irritated by something, but I’m less irritated in the cold. I’m not really sure why. I seem, I don’t know, my neurons fire better in the cold. I think we’re more genetically adapted to the cold, our kin, members of our race. I don’t know, I just seem to be happier when the weather’s a little cooler. I mean, what do you want? You want to lay in bed sweating all night, getting eaten by mosquitoes? It’s not for me, man! I don’t know why people like going to these third world countries for holidays like Thailand and all that shit! Like:

 

“Oh, my God, everything’s so cheap!”

 

Yeah, it’s cheap because it’s a shit hole! And no one actually wants to live there. They make all their money through tourism. It’s too hot there! I don’t really. I’m not interested in that kind of weather. I like to be far away from the equator.

 

But Joel told me, I wasn’t going to wear the beanie because I thought it’s a bit of its a bizarre kind of a beanie. I don’t have any other beanies. This has kind of been handed down to me. I’ve had it for a long time. But Joel said it looked “ornamental”. So I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but you’re gonna have to endure the beanie, guys. Look, sorry if it looks stupid. I’m not taking it off. My head’s cold.

 

02 Trump vs Musk Feud

top

 

Joel Davis: Hold frame! Don’t concede frame like that, don’t concede frame like that.

 

But, yeah, no, I got the beanie on to, because I just want to be cosy, feel cosy. But yeah, so let’s get into it.

 

I mean, there’s a lot to break down. Today, all the news breaking, waking up this morning, Australian time, and all the news breaking of Elon Musk and Donald Trump falling out. That’s kind of interesting. Like, I wasn’t expecting to cover that on the show tonight. Kind of you could see that brewing for a while, but I wasn’t expecting it to blow up like that. I think maybe we will kind of analyse that, but maybe later in the show.

 

03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes

top

 

But first there was a kind of provocative rally. I don’t know who did it. These guys, they all dress in black and so on. I don’t really know who they are, but it was kind of interesting. They had an interesting little banner drop, kind of banner action the other day. They put out a video. So maybe we could play the video and then. Yeah, then we could analyse it.

 

[Start of clip]

 

9 news: Bouquets of flowers marking another victim of Victoria’s machete crisis. Police say up to 10 young men of African appearance are, still on the run. A teenage boy has escaped. Injuries unleashed.

All seven people allegedly involved in that violent machete brawl at Melbourne’s Northland Shopping Centre have now been arrested. That’s good news. So Andrew McCormack is in Melbourne, Maca. It comes as the state’s landmark machete ban comes into effect today.

Anita Allan (Vic State Premier): These knives are dangerous weapons. They have no place on our streets anywhere! And that is why I will introduce as many laws to get these dangerous knives off the streets.

NSN members: Chanting (with “Ban Niggers Not Machetes” banner), White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back!

7 News: Police are investigating after a mob of masked militants gathered at Northland Shopping Centre in the early hours of this morning.

[End of clip]

 

Blair Cottrell: Funny how we didn’t have much of a problem with knife crime in Australia until the government filled the country full of Africans. [chuckling] But it’s the knives that are the problem, not the people wielding them! Not the people with sub 70 IQs that don’t really understand how to deal with conflicts or get what they want through any other method than by using a knife. That’s not the problem! It’s the knives themselves! Can you believe these people? I don’t know. Joel, what do you think?

 

[05:37]

 

04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean this it was interesting to watch the reaction to this, because by the standards of NSN rallies, this one was pretty tame. But just because there was a tactical N-word on the banner, it got a massive response online. Just from my clicking around on TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and so on. It accumulated more views. Like the short phone clip video of the action. It accumulated more views than Australia has people. I counted at least 30 million views. Not to mention it was broadcast on the news. And not to mention whoever else uploaded it or reacted to it, I didn’t see.

 

So this went very viral! Like this got a lot of attention online. And it got a lot of attention in not in, not with, not necessarily the most politically engaged audiences, because it was posted by mainstream media accounts or other just kind of random news accounts and so on.

 

So initially it was posted on Twitter. It was posted by people connected to the so-called dissident Right. And you know, a lot of people liked it, obviously.

 

But also it drew a lot of criticism from people who said:

 

“Oh this just associates our worldview with incivility and with vulgarity. And this is just going to turn people off. And normal people they’re willing to have an adult conversation about immigration and crime and even like race and crime, but not when you go dropping the N-word.”

 

But then I started reading the comment sections on Instagram and TikTok and so on, and the comment sections were dominated by seemingly normal people, loving it! And saying, “there’s nothing wrong here”. They were very supportive. They were saying:

 

“How come White people can’t stand up for ourselves? That’s a double standard, blah, blah blah.”

 

Basically siding with the demonstration. There wasn’t too much discussion of “are these people feds?” There wasn’t all this discussion of “is the N-word offensive?”. Now obviously Leftists and non-Whites in particular, non-Whites didn’t like the rally and reacted negatively towards it. But the rally’s not for them. It wasn’t designed to appeal to them. The people that it was designed to appeal to, seemingly liked it.

 

And I think what we need to kind of come to terms with is the fact that this so-called “normie” out there that, is willing to have a grown up conversation about race, but gets turned off if you ever mention Hitler or use a racial slur or something. This person doesn’t actually exist! It’s a totally contrived concept drummed up by over politicised conservatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really though? I think they exist in the form of the Boomer. Not all the time, but some older generation people, they close down as soon as you mention Hitler, as soon as you start to become vulgar with terminology that you’re using regarding race. I know Boomers that will shut off instantly with that kind of stuff. So they do exist, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think the people that shut off with that kind of stuff, they’re also not willing to, they’re shutting off in general, like they’re shutting off towards, … I don’t think people that are really open to a pro-White, like a kind of racist, racialist perspective. I don’t think that there’s a lot of people like that that are also super offended by the N-word or something. I think if you’re offended by the N-word, it’s because you’re actually offended by racism in general, no matter how clean it’s presented to you.

 

And in fact, if you do, what you saw here was, if the banner said “ban blacks not machetes” or “ban Africans not machetes” or something like that, it would have got some traction, but nowhere near as much. It would have been nowhere near as provocative to I think mass audiences. And it wouldn’t have driven a conversation, because what it did is it created this dichotomy in people’s minds of:

 

“How come the system, how come the mainstream media is more concerned about naughty words then they’re concerned about knife crime? They’re concerned about people getting slashed up with machetes, that they’re concerned about you know, incompatible, you know, races being brought into our country en masse.”

 

I’ll just bring Blair back on. Dropped off there as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry to interrupt. I have this like this hectic new mouse that I bought and it’s got all these buttons on the side and apparently one of those buttons closes the tab that I’ve currently accessed.

 

So I have to be careful not to, or maybe I can programme it so that doesn’t happen. I’ll figure it out. Sorry, please continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what I was saying was is that the use of the N-word, not only did it, basically get more attention as a result, but it also created this dichotomy between how come the system and the mainstream media is more concerned with mean words or offensive speech, than they are with you know, savage violence. And also the ridiculousness of government policy that no one can tell it like it is like machetes don’t produce violent crime you know, violent criminals produce violent crime! And there’s obviously a massive difference, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Africans statistically produce more violent crime as well. Like that is just a statistic fact!

 

05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!

top

 

Joel Davis: And why the fuck are there Africans in Australia! Like indeed. The argument for immigration is usually these people come in, they contribute to our society, they work hard, they become doctors, they become, … Africans are not coming in and contributing to our society. They’re bringing with them incredible amounts of crime. These people are coming from war torn backwards countries. They’re savage races. They’re not compatible with Western civilisation.

 

You know, obviously we push back against the arguments made for you know, the benefits of, the so-called benefits, of like Asian immigration or something, but at least they have some kind of argument if you’re looking just through the prism of economics and you don’t think about certain things.

 

But with the African migrants it’s basically impossible to really see what the benefit, supposedly is, of these people coming into our country.

 

[12:15]

 

 

06 Whites Created the Problems in the Rest of the World Through Our Expansionism and Colonialism?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not on the basis of them being any benefit to our country that they’re brought into the country though. It’s on the basis of I think two things. Human equality, the idea that everyone can be equal if they just experience the same kind of social, opportunities, situation.

 

And also the fact that Africa or African people only live in extreme poverty and experience war conflicts as a result of White colonialism!

 

And so they’re not brought into the country on the basis of its beneficial to us or being beneficial to us, it’s equality, and White people must pay for what they’ve done! So how do we get around that? How do you get around those arguments in the conversation with the standard person when someone brings that up, what’s a nice effective, quick way to respond to that, to shut them down, do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I think it’s quite simple. Like, number one we are first and foremost responsible to our own people and to ourselves before we have to like, worry about the problems of the rest of the world. Like, it’s not our responsibility to say, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But we created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism. It’s all our fault!

 

And so now we have the, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s just bullshit!

 

In sub-Saharan Africa they hadn’t even invented the wheel yet when the White man showed up. These people were living in a totally savage, weren’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Weren’t the Egyptians black? [chuckling] That’s what some of them think. I’ve seen that online the, …

 

Joel Davis: The pharaoh Akhenaten. Based upon the DNA evidence, do you know which population is most genetically similar to Akhenaten, Blair, in the world today?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard. But remind me, it’s like redheads, isn’t it? Like Germans and redheads.

 

Joel Davis: Well, specifically the Scottish. The Scottish people are the most genetically similar, followed by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! So there you go.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we waz. We waz [kangz].

 

07 How Irish Are You? Joel and Blair’s Ancestry

top

 

Blair Cottrell: How Irish are you? I think I’m a quarter Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Not that much. I got Ulster Scott in me, but they were from what’s called Northern Irish, but they’re not Irish, they’re Scottish. I’m more Scottish than anything other than English. Like a 50, 50 Scottish English blend. I used to think that there was more Irish in my ancestry because members of my family couldn’t distinguish correctly between northern and southern Irish. And then when I looked into it myself, I verified that.

 

But you can tell by the way I look as well. I think I got more of that look. I don’t have a very Irish look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I also thought I also thought I had more Irish in me than I do, since members of my family couldn’t distinguish between crime and peaceful resolution to conflict! [chuckling] But no, like, we go, okay. The Cottrells do all right. Mostly farmers and butchers is the history of my family. So honest people, hard working, honest people. I’m proud to come from lineage like that.

 

Joel Davis: Were you able to trace yourself back to any convicts?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. I haven’t really looked into it though, to be honest. I haven’t looked into it. My grandmother on my father’s side says that her line goes back to German and she had some evidence of that. I can’t remember what it was. But the name Cottrell often pronounced Cotrel, is from an old Frankish tribe, I think, and first appeared in England during the Norman conquests sometime during the 11th century or after that. So there’s all sorts of European stock from various different places there. English, possibly French, possibly German. We’re just not really sure.

 

08 DNA Labs Selling Your Data to Interested Parties

top

 

So, yeah, it’s all a bit grey. I don’t really go for that DNA testing type stuff. Because I have a friend who knows someone who actually got charged with an offence, a crime, as a result of someone in his family giving their DNA to one of those DNA testing websites, indicating that the testing websites, the people you send the DNA to, they sell your DNA to interested parties, state police, you know, someone growing something in a lab, perhaps. You don’t know what’s happening with your DNA when you hand it into those agencies.

 

So I haven’t done that for that reason. It might be a bit paranoid. Maybe it’s harmless. It’s up to you can do whatever you want, but I don’t really want to spit in a cup and send it through to DNA testing. What about you? Have you done any lineage?

 

09 History of the Name Davis

top

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t done the DNA testing, really, going off, tracing lineage. But my grandparents were pretty good at tracing lineage. So we know most of it back most generations. Yeah, people in the comments are saying Davis is Welsh, A, Welsh name. That’s true.

 

But the thing is that when the convention to develop last names came in Britain, which only happened after the Norman Conquest, so that was 1066, and it was brought in through phases in Britain up until about the 13th century, before everyone had a formal last name there or thereabouts.

 

A lot of people who became Davises was just simply because they were the son of David. You know, there was some guy called David who was their dad or their granddad or something. So that actually happened in Scotland and in England as well as in Wales. It wasn’t only in Wales where that happened, which is why, if you look at the commonality of the surname Davis, it’s more common in Britain. Oh, sorry, in England than it is in Wales. And it’s actually even more common in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America than it is in Britain. And it’s especially common in America.

 

So obviously the Davises, we had a propensity to move when the time came to start settling the new World. So I think it’s like the seventh most common last name in America among American Whites.

 

[18:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: When I went to England, I showed you, I went to one of the oldest cathedrals in England in Winchester, which was the original capital of England before London. I don’t know if it was the official capital, but it was the centre of trade before London became the official capital. And in this cathedral there was like an old book with all of these servicemen, men who had died in service of the Crown. I think it was mostly from the First World War, but when you turned to the page D, DA, there was like 25 or 30 Davises. I noticed more Davises died for England than almost any other surname I could find in the book actually.

 

So, yeah, very popular surname from England.

 

10 Davises in the US Had Slaves Resulting in Niggers Having the Name!

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s a very common name. And yeah, famous Davises include Jefferson Davis, who was the president of the Confederacy of the Confederate States of America.

 

So yeah, we owned a lot of slaves unfortunately in the South. And that has resulted in a lot of niggers. It’s unfortunate for this reason, because we owned a lot of slaves and that has resulted in a lot of niggers in America taking on the Davis name. Why the fuck did we allow blacks to take on the last names of their slave owners? I mean that was. It’s gross! You like watch like the NFL and it’s like “Javante Davis” or some shit! And it’s like, for fuck’s sake! Why do they have our names?

 

Blair Cottrell: But the relationship between families and their slaves I think often was, you know there was relative friendship happening there.

 

And I think both the family and the slaves started really appreciating each other and maybe even the family just became a little too kind to the slaves and that’s how they ended up with the surnames. Or maybe they just kind of adopted those surnames. The slaves, when they were told to write down their name whenever they were becoming, you know, free or legitimate citizens because they couldn’t think of another name to adopt. There’s probably a multitude of reasons.

 

But I know that being a slave in old America didn’t always mean that you were mistreated in any significant way. I mean, sometimes it probably did, but it was sometimes it was just a better alternative to living in the African Wilderness. Right?

 

11 Whites, Jews, Blacks and the Slave Trade

top

 

Joel Davis: One must also remember that we didn’t go around we as in White and I guess a lot of jews were involved in the slave trade, obviously. But we weren’t going around like capturing random wild niggers in the bush of Africa or something. They enslaved their own people and then sold them to us. Right? So, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they didn’t sell them directly to us. They sold them to the jewish merchants who owned the slave ships, who then sold them to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s their shame. Like, if we enslaved our own people and then sold them to niggers that would be our shame. It wouldn’t be their shame.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we would have the intelligence to take responsibility for it. [chuckling] There’s the difference. Right?

 

12 Instagram and the Very Positive Response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Action

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But let me show you guys this.

 

So, I was on, scrolling around. I have a burner Instagram account, which I don’t really use Instagram, I just have a burner account for when people send me shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You should use Instagram more. You strike me as a real Instagram kind of guy. Not really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, maybe I should because I’m banned from everything else, maybe I should give Instagram a go. So there’s this account.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently, before you continue. Instagram is popping off at the moment, I’ve heard like all the memes. Like, there’s a lot more free speech allowed on there than there was before. I think Zuckerberg’s worried about being cut out of the social media capital because I’ve heard reports that it’s actually pretty based. But I don’t know how the true that is in practice. I’ll have to jump on and use it a bit more myself and find out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I heard that a lot of nationalist accounts who were doing well on Instagram from Europe and from America, were all recently banned in a big ban wave. And they’ve nipped that slightly in the bud recently, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t heard about that, so maybe I’m wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we should definitely probably try and make hay while the sun shines on Instagram while we’re banned from X.

 

So this is like just some random Instagram that’s got like less than 2,000 followers. Quick World. Never heard of this before. They just post random news clips, right? And then I was scrolling through and the news clips, they get like 2,000, 3,000 views, if that they posted the clip of the Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner [by NSN] action. 1.9 million views!

 

And then the comments, I was scrolling through every single comment. You know how they show like the top comments that get a lot of likes at the top.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Every single comment was positive! Look at some of these:

 

“A White man so-called hateful rally is 1 million percent more peaceful than a BLM rally. Hahaha!”

 

“So for years we get black riots with participants burning the nation’s flag, screaming black pride, and often committing acts of violence targeting Whites. But this is a disturbing display of pure hate hatred?”

 

This is how normal people are reacting. Right. I got more here, let me pull more up.

 

“I mean, they’re not wrong. No, they’re 100% correct this time. You conveniently left out the fact that they were protesting because four African teenagers threatened a 15 year old boy with a machete. Maybe give all the people the facts before making a biassed post!”

 

You know, it just goes on and on, these kinds of comments. It was incredible to see because I thought, okay, this rally is pretty controversial. I’m sure it, some people will love it, but it will it’s pretty provocative. I was surprised at how supportive a lot of these reactions were, scrolling through social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, me too.

 

Joel Davis: At the beginning you were telling me this is just going to upset normies and no one’s going to like this kind of thing. Maybe you don’t understand normies? Maybe normies are actually more based than you first realised?

 

[24:46]

 

 

13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just that, but I think people don’t always understand the purpose behind it. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong because it wasn’t my idea, but it’s sort of a tactical thing when you drop the N-word like that in a public way. Because it’s an effort, I suppose, to force government officials to react to what you’re doing and thereby demonstrate that they’re more offended, or taking the N-word more seriously than they are violent knife crime. It’s like it’s worse to hold up a banner with that word written on it apparently, than it is to assault someone with a machete in a public shopping centre in broad daylight in front of families and so forth.

 

It’s like that banner has essentially caused more outrage in the political and media class than the knife crime itself. Which is one of the reasons that you use that phrase. Right? You put that phrase on the banner to demonstrate for the public. Because the public don’t like that they don’t like it when there’s an obvious problem that isn’t being addressed for ideological reasons. And that’s what gets people on side. That’s Why I think the public is on your side, regardless of the slur. Because there’s obviously ideological problems. There’s a double standard being employed here.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s why it was a tactical use. Because if there’s a lot of situations where it’s a bit much maybe to drop the N-word, right? But sometimes it’s not a bit much. Sometimes it’s manifestly appropriate. And this is a situation where it is because when you’re talking about blacks running around with machetes, slicing people up in shopping malls, that’s nigger behaviour! What could be more nigger behaviour than that? That’s the exact reason why we have a slur like that for these people. So you know, it makes sense to drop a word like that.

 

And then you see a reaction where Leftists, non-Whites, who have contempt for White people, the system, all these people show so much concern about the use of a word on a banner at 3 o’ clock in the morning when no one got hurt, no one attacked anyone. It was just a video of guys holding a banner at the front of a shopping centre at 3 AM. This apparently is the most horrible thing ever! It’s so horrible! It puts everything in perspective for a lot of people. Like, hey, wait a second. And now you’ve got a sympathetic audience, a sympathetic receptacle for your N-word. Now your N-word can have a lot of potency and power because it really radicalises the conversation, enforces a conversation that otherwise wouldn’t be happening.

 

I mean, look at this. This is Daily Mail, Australia’s TikTok, right? I took this screenshot yesterday. I’m sure it has more views now. You see here I was scrolling through some of the TikToks get a lot of views. Like one here’s got half a million views. This one, 300 something thousand, 50,000.

 

 

Look at the one of the rally, though:

 

“Sickening scenes in Melbourne as White supremacists descend on Shopping Centre.”

 

7.1 million views! Right? I looked on the metrics on The Noticer. It was the biggest post the notice has made you know, this month, most traction and they’re putting out news every day. Comfy Friend posted, a clip of it. It was like one of the most viral things he’s posted. You know, it got incredible amounts of traction. I don’t think he’s got anything more viral than that all year. Why is it so interesting to people? If it’s bad activism obviously it’s good activism.

 

So that’s the thing. It’s like, apparently it’s the rule:

 

“Oh, you can’t use language like that!”

 

But, maybe it’s about trying to find the appropriate way to use language like that. Like controversy is a weapon. And now we’ve forced all of these the politicians to not only talk about the issue but also, very explicitly racialise the issue and show how, the anti-racist ideology is preventing anyone from stating the obvious and trying to come up with the only obvious solution, which is it doesn’t matter whether you ban machetes. If you’ve got a bunch of Sudanese refugees living in your city, they’re going to be engaging in violent crimes. You know, home invasions are happening every other day.

 

14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party

top

 

The same night that this happened, by the way, there were a bunch of Sudanese in Pakenham, which is in southeastern Melbourne. They jumped the back fence into some some high school kids party and started bashing, filming themselves by the way, bashing all the White kids, saying:

 

“Oh, Sudanese things, just Sudanese things!”

 

And they’re like beating them up and taking their shoes, taking their phone, taking their wallet and they’re posting it online like:

 

“Haha, how funny is this? We’re just bashing White kids and taking all their shit!”

 

[29:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: What area was this in Pakenham?

 

Joel Davis: Packenham.

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably the White kids are like significantly outnumbered in Pakenham, I could imagine. Pakenham is a suburb in southeastern Melbourne, like inland suburb that is just notorious for being inundated with immigrants. A lot of immigrants, a lot of black immigrants, Indians. It’s just somewhere that most Australians don’t want to go anymore.

 

15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Mm. But like in Melbourne you, home invasions are through the roof! Every single crime metric is through the roof! And every other day there’s some new story of blacks having a machete fight or running through someone’s house. And this machete fight, we talked about it last week at Northland Shopping Centre. The only reason that it was brought to a heel was because of a random White pedestrian, White shoppers.

 

Blair Cottrell: A random White guy. And isn’t that symbolic of the real solution to this entire problem, is that’s that standalone working class White male. The White male is the only real effective solution to this problem. The White male that is no longer afraid to just stand up and provide that physical, immediate solution. Without that guy willing to do that, then there isn’t any sort of effective solution. There’s just bureaucracy and excuses. So I found that really symbolic.

 

16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well sthe only reason that we can’t solve this problem is because White guys don’t want to get thrown in jail. Because if we were to do something serious about this problem, the system would come down hard on us.

 

Meanwhile, the story was out in the Noticer earlier this year. It has come out in other mainstream outlets. It has come out that the magistrates in Melbourne or in Victoria are being trained by diversity and inclusion, whatever types, to make sure that they lower the sentencing against refugees immigrants and so on, to prevent them from getting deported when they commit violent crimes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So these magistrates would be smarter to realise, …

 

Joel Davis: These blacks are doing, like, home invasions, putting machetes to the throats of innocent families at 2 o’ clock in the morning, taking their car keys and taking their TV and their laptops, whatever. And the magistrates are being trained not to deport them, not to give them a jail sentence longer than one year, which would trigger them getting deported.

 

So then basically, they all know that even if they get caught, it’s a small holiday in prison at worst. So they’ve got no disincentive not to keep behaving like this. They know that they can just take the piss. Whereas if we rose up against them and put them in their place, they’d throw the book at us! Like, forget about it.

 

Not only are the police, and I don’t necessarily blame the police for this because it’s you know, their hands are tied. But the system! Not only is the system not enforcing the law correctly in order to deal with the problem, bringing them in the first place, which there’s no reason to bring them in, that makes any sense.

 

Secondly, not enforcing the law properly so that they basically feel emboldened to behave like this. Third, the they will actively destroy the lives and punish harshly anyone in the community who tries to put a stop to it ourselves.

 

And so they’ve created the problem, at all three levels.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re a magistrate, you’d be smart enough to realise that you’re being taken for a ride when you’re being put through a diversity and inclusion brainwashing process. You know, magistrates aren’t stupid people. You know, they’ve been in law quite a while. They’ve well I can only assume they’re not stupid people, but maybe they’re just so keen on keeping their position, keeping their their job as a magistrate that they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

That’s the problem as well, isn’t it? It’s money, money, cowardice and the comfort of a minister’s chair or something like that.

 

17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites

top

 

But you were saying earlier, you were remarking on being surprised by how much support you were mustering up from regular people in response to a banner which would in times hitherto have just been considered vulgar and perhaps would actually just cause public uproar. And so isn’t that interesting though how The Times are changing and I think people are just angry. They’re angry enough to not even care about that word. They’re angry enough to support whoever is standing up against this, regardless of what kind of language they’re using, because people just want to see results. And that’s notable because the primary force or the sort of people who champion anti-racism are White people. White people are the reason anti-racism exists! Without naive, obsequious White people who are obsessed with feeling good about themselves, we wouldn’t have anti-racism.

 

But now we’re seeing this phenomena where many White people are sick of that. Many White people are turning their backs on anti-racism because they’re just interested in seeing results. If they have to be racist in order to see those results, so be it. They don’t care. And that’s exciting man. I’m excited to see where that future leads.

 

[35:11]

 

 

18 Upcoming Communist Anti-Nazi Rally at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it’s going to be interesting too because tomorrow, there’s some follow up stories about this shopping centre in Preston, in North Melbourne called Northland. Number one there’s going to be a communist organised rally tomorrow at the shops. An anti-Nazi rally because we held up a banner that said nigger on it. I wasn’t there, of course I wasn’t there! But, you know, members of the Org, members of the NSN allegedly were there.

 

And so they’re going to have an anti-Nazi rally. That’s going to be interesting. I wonder if that’s going to make the news. What kind of freaks are going to show up to that? I saw they said “trans folk and refugees welcome”. So I don’t know why the trannies are getting lumped in that.

 

[Image: The anti-Nazi Rally that took place on Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at Northland shopping centre Preston, Melbourne.]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll be destroyed. They’ll be destroyed! They’ll be de-legitimized by their own optics. So let them do it.

 

19 Meat Cleavers Being Carried as a Weapon

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I hope we get some footage because it sounds like an absolute freak show!

 

And then also yesterday we had a story where someone was arrested at Northlands because they were wielding a meat cleaver as a weapon.

 

So the machete ban doesn’t seem to be going too well. They’re just moving on to meat cleavers now. So I wonder if they’re going to ban meat cleavers? I don’t know what the butchers are going to do. Say goodbye to your Scotch fillets because they won’t be able to chop them up anymore. Going to have to just buy the whole cow, basically, and just kind of gnaw it, because meat cleavers are probably going to be made illegal next.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s at the discretion of police when they bring in a ban like this. Like, if police see you carrying a meat cleaver on public transport obviously they’re going to take that from you. But if you’re using a meat cleaver as a butcher, I think you’re going to be okay. I know that you’re making a joke. Maybe I’m just being autistic. But yeah.

 

20 Machetes Useful When Going on Bushwalks

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I am making a joke, but that was already the case about machetes. But apparently they’ve got to ban them, so you can’t buy a machete at Bunnings [similar to Home Depot]. Say you want to go on a bushwalk a machete is very useful if you’re going off the beaten track to, basically slice your way through vegetation and so on. Because I don’t know if you guys have ever been on a bushwalk at home, or a forest walk or whatever you Americans call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Walk through the woods.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When you get off the path, and you’re kind of having to kind of crawl your way through shrubs and so on it becomes exhausting. Your arms get all sliced up. Having a machete just to hack through it makes your life so much easier.

 

So now we can no longer hack through vegetation without a special licence. I wonder how you get your machete licence? I don’t even know even how it works.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t even walk through a lot of bushland in Australia at all anymore. There’s this weird situation going on where certain lands and public parks. I don’t know what they’re called. They’re like National Parks. I think they’re called, which means they’re like public property, but they’re being closed off due to some Aboriginal heritage or Land Rights Act.

 

And apparently there’s dozens of National Parks all across the country that the government’s closed access to. And some of them are major tourist attractions. So people come to this country to walk through certain regions and see various landscapes and they can’t do it because of Aboriginal rights or something like that. But that’s a different subject to explore entirely. I saw this in a video recently. But I think there might be something deeper going on there. Perhaps the government is selling that land to private enterprise for some specific purpose. I don’t know. But I’ve got to look into it. If anyone knows anything about that, send me some details because I’m interested.

 

21 Calling Whites ‘Cum Skins’ as a Slur

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see that there’s some seething! I don’t know if they’re a nigger, or a pajeet, but something like that, in the comments. I see the moderators have taken them out, but he called us “come skins”. I find that to be an interesting insult. Apparently this is an anti-White insult. Because of course we call them shit skins. I’d much rather be the come skin than the shit skin because you are refuse! But we’re the seed of life, you know. We’re the seed of life. So of all the kind of bodily fluids to identify with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s virtually impossible to be offended by a racial slur if you’re White. [chuckling] Because it’s like being White is, it’s great to be White! It’s not a problem. Point it out in any way that you think is derogatory. And it’s just funny to us. [chuckling] You can’t get offended by racial slurs unless you don’t like yourself. Because someone’s pointing out your race to you and you’re trying to deny and cope with your own racial identity that you don’t like. And so you’re offended because someone’s pointing out a reality that you’re trying not to acknowledge, Right? So all you got to do is like yourself and suddenly racism is funny.

 

22 Blacks Are ‘Offended’ by ‘Nigger’ Because It Gives Them Power

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s a thing with blacks too. Like if blacks, blacks already kind of 50% owned the word nigger because they turned it into like cool. You know, they got it in like rap music and they’re like, “what’s up my nigger?” And so on. And all it is like Latin for black etymologically. Like it’s nothing to even be offended by if they would just chill with everyone calling them niggers too, and like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I’m a, you’re a White guy, or whatever.”

 

It would have no potency, would have zero potency. It’s only got potency because they’re offended by it. Now they also pretend to be offended by it because it gives them power. They get to be a victim and it authorises them to commit acts of violence and aggression towards Whites.

 

And so they’ve charged it for their own hate, for the purposes of their own hatred. That’s very important to remember. The only reason why blacks get offended by the word is because they hate White people. And they want to be able to develop some kind of excuse by creating this kind of fake moral conundrum. They want to be able to create a way, a pretext, to express their racial hatred.

 

[41:04]

 

23 Average Aussies Males Don’t Like People Claiming to Be ‘Offended’

top

 

Blair Cottrell: They still want to be accepted by us as well. It’s like they don’t like us, but they also want to be treated as equals at the same time. So I don’t know what’s going on there. It’s kind of something to do with an inferiority complex, I think. But I don’t know. All I know, though, is if you’re offended by something, if you’re getting worked up about something, Australians, they’re going to keep doing whatever it is that offends you. They’re going to keep developing that line, they’re going to keep poking the bear and they’re gonna take the piss any way they can.

 

So this is not the kind of place where in social situations, being offended doesn’t really hold any weight down here in Australia. The government tries hard to make it a thing and the media’s on board, obviously.

 

But I think one of the reasons the standard working class Australian tends to still have pretty based perspectives is because it’s when you’re offended down here, it doesn’t mean anything. In a typical social situation, people just laugh at you. That’s a good thing!

 

24 They’re Trying to Make Being an Aussie ‘Bloke’ Illegal

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s how it works in a normal Australian friend group. Like, if you get offended by something, everyone will keep bullying you until you realise that you’re getting bullied because you’re offended.

 

Like if you just bantered back, then you wouldn’t be targeted. Yeah, it’s just until you realise that you’re making yourself a “victim” and then that produces a social space free of “soft cuntism”, basically, as Jacob Hersant calls it. That’s normal Australian, you know, particularly male relations.

 

And yeah, obviously they’re trying to make being a bloke illegal. Australia used to be all about being a bloke. It used to be about, drive a V8, get on the piss, do doies [donuts], send it, have a farm, you know, say what you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe an occasional race riot on the beach!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re trying to make being Australian illegal. That’s what they’re trying to do. Because a bunch of faggot communists and seething ingrates in charge.

 

25 a Conspiracy to Make Aussies into a Mongrel Slave Race

top

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t bully Aussies, can you? You can’t turn Australians into slaves, into a slave class. That’s why they’re trying to get rid of us. They want to replace us with a more manageable population they can bully, push around, force them to live in little McMansions and cubicles, force them to work 16 hours a day. You can’t do that to Aussies! They’re not going to play that game. And that’s what it all comes down to I think it’s about replacing us with a slave race, with a mongrel slave race. And that conspiracy, I think, is the most outstanding one! It’s the one that’s at the centre of all other conspiracies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also a lot of the people who want to convert us into a slave race are themselves already members of it. They’re trying to drag us down to their level. That’s the other thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Misery loves company, bro! Misery loves company!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s all these freaks that are going to show up to the shops tomorrow to do their anti-Nazi protest. They’re basically the dregs of society that want to drag everyone down to their level.

 

26 the Miserable Mentality of Leftist Freaks

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you imagine the sort of things people like that talk about in private? Can you imagine the threshold of conversations like you wouldn’t be able to say anything that you’re actually thinking. All you’d be able to do is like, give shit to Nazis and talk about what a good person you are for standing up for minorities. You know, talk about the Arab style scarf that you just got given by Socialist Alternative rally on the weekend. What a boring shit life! [chuckling] It’s like, I can’t even visualise it, man! I don’t. Sorry for doing it to you. If you’re thinking about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, they. It’s basically just a misery convention where they all get together and talk about how victimised they are and how all the different mental illnesses they have and you know, no one’s allowed to make any jokes that offend anyone. They just morally police each other all the time. It seems horrible.

 

When I was younger, I did associate with people who are ideologically Leftist in certain situations. And I never lasted long because I just offended them because I can’t help myself, I’m me! I’m an edge lord, you know, naturally. So it never worked out. But which is good. I mean, that’s obviously just natural. I don’t belong with them.

 

27 Blair’s Encounter as a Teenager at a Marxist Convention with Fat Lesbians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So I found, I found them first as well. Like I’ve told the story a couple of times. Went to a Marxist convention when I was 18 because they were some of the first posters I saw. The posters they used to spread around Melbourne had a slogan on them saying “ideas to challenge the system”. You know, I was an edgy teenager. So, yeah:

 

“I don’t like the system. Let’s go meet these people and see what they’re talking about. No, man, not my clan at all!”

 

Wasn’t a single other working class person there. It was just all of these very overweight lesbian looking women glaring at me as though I was the enemy. And I’m like:

 

“Hey, I’m just here because we don’t like the system, right? Or hang on, these people kind of are the system. These are the exact, this is our problem right here. I’m thinking.”

 

So, [chuckling] yeah, it’s like a fake resistance. I determined it was kind of like a fake resistance that exists to possibly catch people like me and steer them in the wrong direction to essentially neutralise someone who could potentially join a revolutionary, a real revolutionary force.

 

[46:36]

 

28 Ted Kaczynski Summed up Leftism Pretty Well

top

 

Joel Davis: I think Ted Kaczynski summed up Leftism pretty well. His assessment is that:

 

“Leftists are people who are upset with the system or not embodying its own values purely enough. So they’re not revolutionaries. They don’t oppose the values of the system. They support the system so much that they’re upset with the system for not being more systemy than it actually is!”

 

So like that’s what they’re all saying. They’re like:

 

“Oh, look at the White privilege of these men standing in balaclavas at 3 AM! How come they weren’t arrested?”

 

They, probably weren’t arrested because it’s impossible to tell who the fuck they are because they’re covering up their identity because the anti-White system would arrest them and try to throw them in prison otherwise!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but what the Leftists want is for like 30 likely suspects to be rounded up at random and, executed out in the Woods for social justice! Maybe they’d be happy with that, but probably that still complain that it didn’t happen fast enough. [chuckling] I don’t know, man!

 

I mean, that’s what’s, that’s how crazy things can get though. Like, history proves that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what they are.

 

I mean, these Leftists, they’re totally, entirely dependent upon the system as individuals. They they’re on all kinds of like, medications. A lot of them are on disability benefits or Centerlink. You know, these people are not independent people that don’t need like a large bureaucracy to prop up their lives. You know, they need to go and see like mental health professionals and they need all this support! Right. I think they advocate for, is making everyone feel included and supported and having more government programmes to take care of everyone. They call themselves “anarchists”. It’s the most un-Anarchistic position you could possibly have! They can’t have enough government. They want to turn everything into a democracy. They want everything in society to be this big bureaucratic voting committee procedure where, that’s their ideal. They don’t want to be left alone.

 

29 Marcus Follin Said That ‘Dysgenics is the Only Reason Leftism Still Exists’.

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d have more empathy for them if they weren’t so self contradictory, if they weren’t literally representing the opposite of what they claim to represent. It’s wild that people can come to that manner of existence.

 

But look, in summary, Marcus Follin [aka the Golden One] said that:

 

“Dysgenics is the only reason Leftism still exists.”

 

It’s just dysgenic. It’s bad genetics, bad blood, too much drugs, too much of that victim psychology that comes along with just being genetically deficient. And like, you can’t really get past that summary. I don’t think that’s a good summary. Wraps it all up.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah! Fair enough. Is there anything else to say about this particular subject? I mean everyone knows, everyone who’s an Australian at the very least knows about the problems with African crime. There’s not much point going over it again. I mean, it’s important to reiterate it to the public.

 

But you know, we all know about it and we cover it on the show all the time.

 

But yeah, it was interesting to see. I think the, it’s more the reaction to the banner and how it was received by different groups of people that I found more interesting to be honest than anything else.

 

30 A Non-White Reaction to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Video

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I wanted to remark on a reaction video I saw that, a woman filmed. The woman was not White.

 

Joel Davis: Do you have it? I can play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t. I saw it in some chat on Telegram and I’m in so many different chats that people add me to, I can’t remember which one it was. But I remember some of what she said. She was clearly very upset, wasn’t White by anyone’s standards. I don’t know what she was though. She kind of looked maybe slightly African and, I don’t even know. But she was quite wide eyed in the video here and there, like kind of crazy eyed! But there was something she said I found interesting. She demanded that:

 

“Other people need to call this out!”

 

Sure, she said the police should arrest these guys and investigate and blah blah, blah. But she said:

 

“Other people must call this out!”

 

And I thought, isn’t that peculiar? Whenever someone who’s not White feels discriminated against, targeted by racism, they appeal to other White people to come to their aid. It’s like they feel like they can’t even help themselves. They require the White champions of anti-racism to storm in and save the day! And it brings me back to what I was saying before. What happens when those anti-racists no longer exist within the White community? What happens when White people actually start to become ethnically conscious and realise they’re just losing out as a result of this equality worldview? That anti-racism is actually just against their collective ethnic interests. It works against them in every way! You know what happens then? It’s like when all these non-White people are complaining about racism, it basically just dies out, doesn’t it? The whole thing dies out.

 

I mean what do you think? Why do you, why do you think they do that? Why do you think they appeal to White people whenever they experience discrimination? Why can’t they deal with it themselves? Why can’t they come up with some resolution as a result of their own thinking?

 

[52:09]

 

31 Why Non-Whites Call On Whites When They Experience ‘Discrimination’

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, because they know that they’re in our country. And, if White people en masse basically saw our position as legitimate and joined with us in our cause their position in our country becomes precarious. So they need, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It just occurred to me, maybe she was. I’m kind of just thinking while I’m listening and thinking back to the video as well. Maybe she was afraid? Maybe it wasn’t just anger in her eyes that I saw, but fear as well. Maybe she thought that the fact that banner drop happened, it might be a sign that White people aren’t as anti-racist as they were before and therefore her presence in our country isn’t as secure as she once previously believed? Maybe it’s kind of like a fear reaction, a self preservation thing. Like:

 

“Come on guys, we need to call this out. We can’t let this become the norm or I won’t be able to live here anymore. Fuck!”

 

Maybe it’s something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s basically that she’s obviously showing her anxiety. You told a story about when you’re in jail and I thought that was pertinent. Where you were talking about how there was like some non-White guy. This is years ago, when you’re in prison, like before you became so ideological.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good story.

 

32 Blair’s Prison Story About a Nepalese Taking Advantage of His Kindness

top

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you should tell the story. It’s your story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m like 22, I think. And, I’m almost done serving my prison sentence in Port Phillip Prison. And this new guy comes in. He’s Nepalese, from Nepal. Tiny little guy. Like he had a man’s face with stubble, but on the body of like an 8 year old boy by our standards. I couldn’t believe how small he was. And he looked like he hadn’t eaten a good meal in weeks.

 

And a little while later I was cooking some eggs. Used to cook eggs on a sandwich press, like on a toasted sandwich maker because we didn’t have anything else to cook on. So you just fire that up, cook your eggs on that. And I was cooking like 10 eggs. I used to buy a maximum amount of eggs you’re allowed to buy as a prisoner, which was three dozen a week. And he walked by and I signalled to him and I gave him some eggs just because he looked so skinny! It was almost irritating me. I’m like:

 

“Get some food into your mate. You look like you need a good meal!”

 

Problem is though he didn’t see it as a random act of kindness. I didn’t realise it at the time, but he saw it as a weakness! He looked at me a certain way and then every day after that he just asked me for more eggs and other stuff too! More than once actually.

 

After that I noticed him looking into my cell as he walked past, seeing what else I had, seeing what he could get out of me. And then a group of Arabs, I saw this happen. They pulled him into a cell, tied him to a toilet and kicked the shit out of him. Probably for no reason. That happens in jail sometimes.

 

And I remember this because I was sitting down while this was happening, a few cells down, I could hear it happening. And he was shouting my name! He was shouting. He couldn’t say my name properly because English was his second language. He was saying “Blaira”. Screaming at the top of his lungs, “Blaira, Blaira”. And they were laughing at him. I could hear them laughing at him, saying:

 

“He’s not going to help you.”

 

And I thought to myself:

 

“What does he expect? Does he expect me to charge in there and take on a pack of wild Arabs like it’s a fucking Bollywood movie?”

 

Like, I realised that just by doing one nice thing for this guy, he just expected me to fall all over myself after that, to come to his aid to protect him and to provide him with whatever else he could get out of me.

 

And I realised, this is a great lesson here. I realised that some people, particularly people of the brown distinction, they don’t see kindness as kindness, they see it as naive weakness! And they just try to leverage more out of you perpetually. And isn’t that a good lesson? Or wouldn’t that be a good lesson for our politicians to learn? Because what are the people coming to this country doing? They’re not grateful for being allowed to come into the country in the first place. They’re not seeing it as an amazing opportunity like the Greeks and the Italians did. They’re not working their asses off to do the best they can for their families. Not all of them, not by a long shot. They’re thinking:

 

“Ha! What a bunch of idiots! What else can I get out of these morons? Oh, I can get housing, I can get welfare, I can get special rights because I’m not White and I’m oppressed! I come from war torn country. Wow, these people are really fucking stupid! What else can I get out of them?”

 

And it just never ends, right? So when you’re kind, when someone’s nice to you, when you’re a White person, right, you think to yourself, great, and you make the most out of the opportunity. You’re thankful for it, but you move on. You don’t keep asking for more. You don’t see kindness as weakness. You just understand that it’s a random act of kindness. Because White people are like that. They’re randomly kind because they just empathise with someone in that situation. In the moment. But it doesn’t mean that you can take advantage.

 

And I don’t know, I thought that was a good story to demonstrate that a lot of people out there who aren’t like us, you shouldn’t show kindness to them. You shouldn’t be so nice to them because they just take advantage of it. They actually just see you as stupid or weak for being nice. Maybe I could have told that story better.

 

[57:30]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, you told the story very well. The word kindness, it’s got the, like, etymologically, it means treating someone as your kin, as your kinsman or kinswoman. It means treating someone like family. Well, these people aren’t your fucking family! Stop treating them like that. They’re taking the piss. I mean, it’s pretty obvious. But that’s how non-Whites think. I was thinking about this today as well, when I was thinking about why it is that, I guess I don’t know where Blair went. I guess we’ll be back soon.

 

33 Elon Musk Admired by Merchant Minded Indian and Asians

top

 

When I was thinking about how come it seems like Asians and Indians, like really respect Elon Musk, whereas White people I find even if, you know, Elon Musk has done things over the last couple years that some of the things that he’s done, people like us have liked. Some of the things that he’s done, we haven’t liked. Right. But he’s been a mixed bag the last couple of years.

 

You know, he’s throwing Romans. He partially restored our guys to Twitter, at least for a period of time. You know, he played to the pro-White thing a little bit. But he doesn’t really seem to be respected overall by people in our group, because everyone can kind of smell, White people can smell that he’s got an agenda, that he’s disingenuous in some way. That because he’s a billionaire! He’s one of the richest men in the world. We don’t trust this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one gets that, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Everyone knows that he’s obviously got an angle that is that there’s a disingenuous angle. Everyone can smell it. Every normal White person could smell it. Left-wing or Right-wing, everyone can smell it!

 

Whereas Asians and Indians, they all think that he’s, like, amazing! Because they’re merchant races. So to them:

 

“Wow, look at how rich and successful he is. And look at all of his companies!”

 

In Australia, when you see a Tesla, you will almost never see a White person driving it. I know in America a lot of Leftists before Elon switched teams, a lot of Leftist Whites were driving Teslas as a status symbol. And that happened a little bit here. But predominantly, if you see a Tesla, it’s a fucking Indian or an Asian driving it in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have noticed that.

 

Joel Davis: Because they get sucked in by it because he’s like this rock star merchant. But we’re not a mercantile race. It doesn’t jive with us in the same way. These people think differently. It’s the same.

 

34 Indians and Asians Obsessed with Ways to Make and Spend Money

top

 

I’ve said this before whenever I’ve worked with Indians and Asians, and then it’s been like the lunch break or something and was we’re talking just about you know, making conversation, making small talk. What I have found is that all they want to talk about is ways to make money and ways to spend money:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a good deal here. Oh, what do you think about crypto? Which crypto-currencies do you think are good? Oh, have you got a good bet on the cricket? Blah, blah!”

 

It’s all just like, ways of how to exchange m, you know, mercantile information with one another about ways in which we can make money or spend money more efficiently. That’s their entire fixation. When I talk with White people, yeah, those subjects come up occasionally, but generally speaking, it gets into something with a bit more depth in terms of like philosophy on family or life history or our perspective, our values, whatever, right? Music, art, something like that. But I’ve never been able to have much of a conversation about any of these subjects with an Indian or an Asian because they’re soulless!

 

Blair Cottrell: With the merchant brain it doesn’t really matter how you’ve achieved the success, how you own the companies, how you have the capital. What matters is that you’ve got it! You know what I mean? There’s no, like there’s less of a moral compass. It’s just about success for the sake of success, and that’s it. That’s good enough for the merchant. That’s the way they think.

 

35 More on the Nepalese Guy in Prison

top

 

And in regards to the story about the Nepalese guy, by the way, like, if you might be saying:

 

“Oh, that poor guy, he got beat up by people for no reason. Why didn’t you help him, Blair?”

 

Uh you got to understand, this guy’s in jail. I actually heard about this guy’s story. He was an immigrant on a working visa. He was doing an apprenticeship as a chef under an Australian citizen, and he stabbed the head chef! He stabbed an Australian citizen. So he’s in jail for that. Then he was going to be deported when he finished his sentence. So like there’s a reason he’s in jail, being tied to a toilet and having the shit kicked out of him by a group of Arabs. That’s because God wills it! That’s fate. [chuckling] That’s what happens if you come to this country, you’re not from this country, and you stab a citizen in this country. So like, don’t think that I’m in some position where I’m a noble protector of people who are being beaten up. And you should never think the same about yourself either. You see some guy getting stomped on the street, you have to understand that sometimes he’s put himself in that position and it’s happening for a reason.

 

So if you don’t know someone that’s happening to, or it’s not really your business, you stay out of it! That’s kind of the position I would take generally.

 

[1:02:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if it’s a White guy and there’s a pack of nons, particularly if you’re out with the boys, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You read the situation, …

 

Joel Davis: You gotta back your boy. I mean, that’s happened. I’ve been out with the boys quite a few times, and there’s been a White guy getting picked on by a pack of non-Whites. And, the non-Whites picked on the wrong White, like, at the wrong time, because a pack of Nazis just happened to be there and sort it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] it can happen. Yeah. No, like I said. Anyway, it’s quite obvious when someone is being targeted unfairly, is being stood over, is being bullied, that kind of thing.

 

36 NSN Promo Clip

top

 

Joel Davis: I’m getting a message from NSN HQ Beaming into my headset. Apparently a new hype edit just dropped. Haven’t even seen this edit. I’m gonna play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s watch it. Let’s watch and get a raw reaction to it.

 

Joel Davis: Let’s hit it!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Who makes those, bro? That’s fucking cool! If I was 19, 18, I would join straight away! I mean, put yourself in the position of a young guy growing up in the current conditions, societal conditions. You’re going to join that every time! Whoever sees that and who has any balls left at all is going to join. That’s good stuff. It’s good content.

 

37 On Why You Should Join the Org

top

 

Joel Davis: Imagine, imagine not joining us!

 

Like if you’re an Aussie, you’re a young White dude, even like a middle aged White dude. Join the fucking Org! Like, come on, like be a man, join the clan! You know, fucking hell, like what else are you going to do? What else are you doing? We’re all gonna die! You know, someone close to me died recently. It’s the first time a close member of my family has died so so far in my life and makes you reflect upon, just how quick and short life is and how you got to make it count because who knows, you get hit by a bus tomorrow, who knows?

 

But even if you have a full innings, it’s not that fucking long, you know, it blows, it goes quick and you gotta make it count! You gotta make sure that the time that you do have, you invest it in something worthwhile. And there’s been too many lives wasted amongst our people over recent decades. Too much nihilism, too much individualism in our people are just blowing through their lives on entertainment and trivial matters and you know, trying to make money and just shit that ultimately doesn’t really matter. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be trying to make money and have a successful career but you know, what really matters, what really matters obviously is your family and your nation legacy that you’re leaving behind, the people that you love and that you care about your people and that’s all that really fucking matters. Everything else is secondary.

 

So you know, join the fucking tribe that’s going to put up a resistance to the genocide of our people for fuck sake. Like whatever else that you’re doing is significantly less important.

 

And it’s fucking fine, like we have a fucking great time! So yeah, join the Org, White Australia.org. You can join as a supporter. But if you want to join as a member, get on Telegram, message White Ausbot. That’s WHITE AUSBOT at White Ausbot on Telegram and get vetted and join the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: I realised we just had an ad break, a really cool ad break. Like most streams you would get some gay product like you know, “men’s beard straighteners” or something like that! [chuckling] But in this one you get, we interrupt this stream to bring you exclusive new hype edit, Join the Nazi gang! [chuckling]

 

38 Succulent Chinese Meal – Democracy Manifest Guy

top

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah! By the way, did you see that thing that Tom posted on Telegram just before we went live here? He got a screenshot from everyone surely knows the:

 

“This is democracy manifest!”

 

You know, that guy, the very famous, he was eating a succulent Chinese meal in King’s Cross [Sydney’s old red light area]. I think this was back in the 90s. And he was arrested and it’s a viral clip. Maybe I should pull it up. Surely everyone’s seen that it’s such a famous meme! Such a famous meme. You know it Blair, surely?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like the guy getting carried out of the restaurant?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know the story behind that? The story behind that I, as I heard it is this guy was just travelling around Melbourne eating like really fancy restaurants. I mean, just walking out. So he was getting free dinners every night.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t him though.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wasn’t him?

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! So it was in Sydney. It was in King’s Cross in Sydney. And it was a case of mistaken identity.

 

There was a guy that was doing “dine and dashes” as they call them, and they got the wrong guy or they thought he was doing credit card fraud or something like that. And they come in, they arrest the wrong guy, and he has that hilarious reaction. And now it’s you know, it’s a goated meme. It’s funny how like 50% of Australian memes are some guy getting arrested or engaging with police in some way because we’re a convict colony. It’s like, …

 

[1:09:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny how they have the wrong guy. They have the wrong guy, but he still just gives them so much grief! And it’s a complete smart ass, just by Aussie instinct.

 

I mean, I thought he was the guilty one from the way he reacted, but he’s not. He’s just Australian. [chuckling] And that’s his reaction to authority trying to tell him what to do.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s awesome! It’s goated. It’s legendary. But Tom posted a screenshot from the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, rest in peace. I believe he passed away. He was 82, but he passed away, I think a couple years ago. But it says here:

 

“In 2023, true crime author Mark Dappin published a biography of Carlson, (so his last name was Carlson) titled ‘Carnage A Succulent Chinese Meal, Mr. Rent a Kill, and the Australian Manson Murders’ that explores his connections to other criminals. The book revealed that Carlson was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and Nazism. And then on at least one occasion he threw a party at his home to celebrate Hitler’s birthday!”

 

Jack Carlson was his name.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Wow, I didn’t know any of that. That’s really interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, pretty funny!

 

So the “Succulent Chinese Meal-Democracy Manifest Guy” was our guy! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: You can tell by the way he speaks that he’s a well read individual. You know, he’s quite articulate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, absolutely! I think he was like a Shakespearean actor. He would act in Shakespearean productions and stuff.

 

39 Blair Giving a Lift to a Stranger

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, it’s so interesting the lives people live and you wouldn’t know it. Like you walk pass people on the street.

 

For example, I was getting my car serviced recently and there was an old guy at the mechanic who was also leaving his car there and he had no way to get home, and he lived on the other side of town. So I said:

 

“I’ll take you home, mate, jump in.”

 

I was picking my car up actually, so it was when I was leaving, took him home and we were talking in the car for about 10 minutes. The guy did like 15 years in the Australian Navy, had been to like eight different countries and just had this incredible story, this life story that you wouldn’t have expected. Like he just seemed like some random old homeless guy [chuckling] from the way he was dressed.

 

But yeah, everyone’s got a really interesting set of experiences and if you just ask them the questions, you realise that there’s a lot of little individual worlds going on out there. So much knowledge, a wealth of knowledge. And if you just take an interest and god, I can’t give that advice enough to Zoomers! Zoomers don’t ask enough questions, man!

 

I mean, I love you guys, I love how fast paced you are, how quickly your minds tick over. But you have to ask more questions, right? There’s so much to learn from out there, so much knowledge to absorb.

 

40 More on the Musk-Trump Fallout

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah, let’s talk about the Trump and Elon fallout because it’s quite interesting. Apparently they have a meeting scheduled tomorrow to try and patch things up. So but it was quite interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you reckon it’s some kind of a stunt with an agenda behind it? Does it seem contrived to you?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think so. I think it’s a genuine falling out because Musk donated more, he was the biggest donor to Trump’s campaign. Not only did he donate heaps, but he also bought X and reformatted the whole site to make it more amenable to Trump’s election campaign, which it’s hard to quantify exactly what impact that had on the election, but it was only positive, whatever the impact was.

 

And obviously he got very close to Trump. He was on the campaign trail in the administration. Early days it seemed like every time Trump was doing a press conference Musk was there with him with his like kids and shit and you know, they seem like best buds all of a sudden. But then in recent months they seem to have drifted and Musk isn’t really getting what he wants. I saw he wasn’t happy with the tariffs. That obviously negatively affects his business interests. He was vocal about that. He’s, not happy with. Trump openly rejects the concept of global warming and backs coal and oil, and these traditional industries, even nuclear energy, but has a lot of contempt for so-called green energy programmes and rebates and subsidies and all that kind of stuff.

 

And so now they’re trying to get rid of those which would really negatively affect Tesla because the electronic vehicle rebates make them competitive in the marketplace in the United States. And the tariff regime is not good either way whether they make Teslas in America or outside America. Either they’re exporting out of America and paying a tariff or they’re bringing it into America and paying a tariff. It’s not good from his perspective.

 

And then also from the perspective of SpaceX I saw Trump say that Elon Musk proposed someone to be head of NASA and Trump knocked back because the guy was a Democrat or something is what he said. I don’t know much about it, but obviously Elon was trying to install his guy in NASA because he’s the number one contractor to the US government when it comes to basically rockets and you know, space faring technologies, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe Trump was worried that Elon was going to figure out that NASA is all bullshit! Just a way for the American government to divert funds into unknown endeavours. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they are launching a lot of space satillites.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think they give that much of a shit about space exploration. But I think NASA is mostly about building rocket tech and other technologies, imaging technologies, etcetera, in order to, create intercontinental weapons systems.

 

And obviously Trump is now pushing forward with trying to build, the Golden Dome to try and build new weapons tech that will potentially be able to neutralise the intercontinental ballistic missiles of their adversaries and neutralise their capacity to obliterate them with nuclear weapons through trying to intercept them mid flight and so on.

 

41 Musk and Big AI Contracts and Peter Thiel the Homosexual Billionaire

top

 

There’s also big AI contracts that were given out to Palantir, which is Peter Thiel’s company. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are old associates that go back a long way. Peter Thiel actually fucked Elon Musk over, back when Elon Musk was CEO of PayPal. Thiel did a hostile takeover and kind of took over PayPal from Elon Musk back in the early 2000s when he was on his wedding honeymoon, and fucked him over. So they’re old enemies of sorts.

 

And Peter Thiel is the homosexual billionaire who was also basically responsible for J.D. Vance’s political career. He basically funded him all the way up into the Vice Presidency, first into the Senate and then into the Vice Presidency. Very key power player in American politics.

 

And so it seems like he won out over Elon on the AI contract because obviously Elon Musk has been developing Grok under X in order to develop AI capacity. So Musk has lost out on quite a few counts. And he’s obviously upset about that for perhaps obvious reasons. But it’s like as I said on I said on Telegram, it really goes to show that even if you’re like the number one campaign donor to Trump, it doesn’t buy you that much.

 

42 Trump’s Relationship with the Jews, and the Epstein Case

top

 

And so it really, like, begs the question when it comes to Trump’s relationship with the jews, it seems like it’s more than just campaign financing. It’s almost like the jews have a deeper hold over him than just that, a deeper connection with him than just that. And the campaign financing is secondary. It’s just that he’s their guy, so they give him money to help him get elected.

 

But, you know, it indicates that he’s not just doing the bidding of Israel because they threw a few hundred million at him in his political campaign. But there’s something deeper.

 

And of course, Elon Musk came out today and he’s throwing shit at Trump, accusing him of being in the Epstein files, and that’s why they haven’t been released. And was sharing videos of Trump, you know, chumming up with Epstein back in the day and dancing with him at a party and talking to him about all these girls that he was gonna bang at this party. Or whatever. And strongly implying that Trump was somehow involved in the whole Epstein Island thing. And I don’t know if that’s true or not, but there definitely is nefarious connections there of some sort between him and Epstein because they were associates.

 

But also there’s pictures of [chuckling] Elon Musk with what’s her name? Ghislaine Maxwell as well. So it’s not like Elon Musk has no connection to these people. So anyway, shit is being thrown in either direction. It’s pretty interesting to see a fallout like this.

 

43 On Trump’s Charisma

top

 

And I think that if they don’t patch it up, I think Musk comes off worse than Trump. Like, Musk, you know, came up with the big guns, trying to de-legitimize Trump. But the thing is, Trump supporters are so fucking loyal. Like, Trump has been screwing them over for like a decade, giving them basically nothing that he promised almost for a decade, and they are as loyal as fuck! Because the thing is that Trump has rizz. Trump is the most memeable human being on earth alive today. Like, he’s got incredible charisma, he’s funny, he’s likeable! Elon Musk, however, is not likeable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just wanted to add in addition to him being charismatic, the guy, I don’t know whether this is deliberate or not, but slotting himself into little, like, TV show cameos, classic American film, like when he appears in Home Alone inside that hotel and speaks to Macaulay Culkin, stuff like that really embedded him into American culture! It really made him a folk hero of the people of America. All of that is great PR. It’s almost like a long term strategy to becoming president later in life. It’s like it’s all worked to his advantage.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But like, you can’t deny that there’s just so many incredible moments from Trump. Like, there’s no end to it. Like when he almost got shot. It was awesome!

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s cool!

 

[1:19:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: When he got arrested, the mug shot he did was just goated. The time when he came out of the plane and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just died and he was like:

 

“I did not know that! You’re telling me for the first time!”

 

Like, I could go on for like an hour talking about meme-able moments from Trump. Like, it just never ends. Americans love him because they identify with him. He’s kind of like, “that’s my president!” It’s almost like he’s like an avatar of patriotism in America, for better or worse. Right?

 

44 Trump’s Leverage over Musk

top

 

Elon Musk isn’t even really American, doesn’t even have an American accent. He wasn’t born in America. He doesn’t have that kind of loyalty from the people. And he’s kind of like awkward nerd, and so doesn’t have that kind of loyalty. But also, Elon Musk doesn’t have the leverage. Elon Musk companies, SpaceX, Tesla, they’re dependent upon government subsidies and contracts which Trump can control. And Trump came out and said:

 

“You know what, maybe one way that we could cut all the wasteful government spending that Elon has a problem with is to cut all of the subsidies and government contracts that Elon Musk has. Maybe that would be like the first thing to do. I don’t know why Biden didn’t do that.”

 

And so he’s basically threatening to just take an axe to his fortune. And Trump has the leverage to do that if he wanted to.

 

SpaceX is, they’re saying, has lost like half of its value in one day because of Elon’s antics today. And you know, there’s an argument I saw Steve Bannon come out and say that the Trump administration should just like, seize SpaceX as a national security asset off Musk entirely. And which it could if it wanted to. It has the ability to do that. I’m not saying that it’s going to do that. Trump is notoriously kind of moderate. He doesn’t punish his political enemies anywhere near hard enough. And he’s had that tendency for a long time. I wouldn’t expect it to change here. Probably wouldn’t go after Musk too hard. But he’s holding up the cards.

 

Whereas, like, what cards does Musk really have? Like, if Musk threatened to go and say:

 

“Oh, I’m going to go sell rockets to the Chinese instead of you!”

 

They’re just going to take SpaceX off him. If Trump doesn’t want to subsidise his Teslas, eat shit! What is he going to do about it?

 

45 Musk as a Capitalist, a Merchant and a Con Man

top

 

He can’t go to the Democrats and try and like, support the Democrats. They all hate him now. Like, he’s completely burned that bridge because over the last year or two, Musk has said more radical things than Trump has ever said about White genocide and issues facing White People. And I didn’t support Musk because he’s also gone against us on key issues. Like, I remember over Christmas and New Year he went against us on the whole H1B Visa thing. Apparently White people don’t work hard enough when they need to mass import Indians into America to prop up the tech industry. Which just goes to show how Musk is a fraud, doesn’t really believe in anything seemingly. And he just kind of cares about his bottom line, ultimately. For all the ideological bravado and idealism that he presents when he goes on the Joe Rogan podcast or something, it seems like he’s at the end of the day, he’s a fucking capitalist, he’s a merchant and he’s a con man. He kind of acts like he’s like a libertarian who’s against excess government spending and all this kind of stuff, yet he’s like the biggest net beneficiary of government handouts in America.

 

So I think people have a lot less patience for him than for Trump, and Trump has the leverage. So if Musk doesn’t cuck to Trump and doubles down, I could see this being like a death spiral for Elon Musk potentially, which I’d love to see because number one, it’d be funny. And number two, a punished Elon Musk. He could end up doing interesting stuff that destabilises politics in a way that opens up opportunities perhaps for us. You know, it’s its kind of like a wild card. Like the world’s richest man also pissed off at the government with like no political allies. What does he do next? Probably something interesting.

 

So hopefully they don’t patch it up tomorrow and we just like see this feud like exacerbate because it would be it’d be interesting at the very least, but it could potentially result in more free speech on X rather than less, or something where he goes off the reservation. I don’t know, tries to win, win us back somehow by playing to us more.

 

46 Blair Thinks Musk Will Patch Things up with Trump

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe finally my like mid takes that aren’t even that extreme, me and those takes will be allowed back on X. Like out of everyone that got censored, you got to admit, censoring me was one of the most unfair moves.

 

I mean, I try to play by the rules, I try to be the nice guy, but as I’ve said previously in politics, like being the nice guy doesn’t really get you anywhere. Sometimes you got to be the bad guy.

 

But I think they’ll patch it up, man! I think they’ll come to some sort of agreement, because especially in. By what you’ve just described it’s in Musk’s interests to really try to get somewhere with this. Right. It’s not really wise for him to be in Trump’s bad books. But it also goes to show that a lot of the time, political donors don’t have as much power as a lot of people think they do they probably have a lot more power in Australia, [chuckling] but in America, maybe not so much. A lot of the time the people they’re backing can turn on them for various reasons because politics is a bit unpredictable like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it goes to show that maybe it’s like the Mossad getting you on video banging underage people or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: Capturing your children and marrying your children into their bloodlines and things like that are probably more significant than just who writes the checks, like, on some level.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they figured that out eventually, didn’t they? Like, foreign intelligence agencies would have figured out that eventually that money on its own just isn’t enough. They need more leverage over these personalities in countries of interest. But whenever there’s a big split or disagreement between two powerful characters in a country of interest, then it’s a good opportunity for subversives to sort of jump onto the scene as well. And it may, in some cases be the result of the work of subversives. So there’s that to take into consideration for Trump and Musk.

 

[1:25:43]

 

47 Trump’s ‘Big Dog’ Style of Treating Opponents

top

Joel Davis: I hope that their egos get the better of them. Because one thing you notice about Trump is when he has leverage over someone, he flexes on them. Like, I remember when he was kind of staunching in the first administration, he was staunching Kim Jong Un, and he was calling him Little Rocket Man, and he was like:

 

“You’ve got little rockets, I’ve got big rockets. You know don’t fuck with me. Like, if you want to test them out, we’ll send out big rockets and blow up your little rockets!”

 

And then Kim Jong Un ended up inviting him to North Korea, and Trump is standing in the demilitarised zone in Korea, and he was doing the little bunny ears behind Kim Jong Un for all the cameras, just kind of ridiculing him.

 

Or like, when he had Zelensky in the White House, you know, he Was big dogging him in front of the cameras. Trump big dogs world leaders, all the time. He kind of stands over them and he shakes their hand all aggressive and like, pulls them in. He’s got this kind of like natural kind of like dominance aura that he uses to, obviously his advantage. He is successful in politics and business for a reason. He knows how to put himself about. And he’s a great shit talker. He’s always shit talking all of his fucking rivals.

 

Elon’s gone pretty scorched earth here! Elon’s going on Twitter and is accusing him of being a fucking paedophile! He’s going hard! Like, it’s not just like saying you disagree over this or that government policy. Like, he’s going full scorched earth, saying he wants to fund a new political party that can take on the Republicans. And like he retweeted Ian Miles Chong saying:

 

“Trump should be impeached for being on Epstein’s island and J.D. Vance should become president.”

 

And all this kind of shit! So he’s going pretty hard.

 

48 Trump’s Appeal to Conspiratorial Paranoia

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of these relationships in politics, even amongst the world’s most powerful people are so fragile. What I was going to say is Trump is relentless. He knows how to appeal to the conspiratorial paranoia. Maybe it’s not paranoia, maybe it’s on point, but just the conspiratorial nature of a lot of his supporters. Like when he mentioned Elon’s black eye and before he was going on some show, he offered him some makeup to cover it up. And Elon didn’t want the makeup, which he thought was interesting. We all know what he’s insinuating there. There’s some weird theory about all of these celebrities that are in some sort of club and at one point they’ve all had black eyes, which may be part of some sort of ritual or initiation process. I don’t know. But maybe Trump doesn’t know either.

 

But the fact that he knows how to appeal to that strong nature of a lot of the people that support him, that’s interesting that he’ll, …

 

49 Trump is a High Level Freemason and is Supported by the Deep State

top

 

Joel Davis: Trump is a high level Freemason. He knows the score. Yeah, he knows what’s happening. He’s in charge for a reason. People were saying:

 

“Oh, Joel! (idiots online) Oh, Joel! If the Deep State has been against Trump for years, if he really went to Epstein’s island, they would have released it!”

 

The Deep State are totally fine with Trump being the fucking President of the United States. You think he’d be able to just waltz into the presidency if the Deep State had an issue? Like, if you’re in my Telegram chat, how are you still operating on this Qtard, like surface level understanding, like, Trump is fucking part of the Deep State! He’s chosen by the Deep State, you fucking idiots!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, well, why did they attack him, Joel? Why did they go so crazy attacking him during his first presidency then? How do you explain that? You know what it is? This is my take.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

50 Blair’s View of Trump and the Deep State

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes when you, as a subversive, when you’re into psych warfare, when you’re trying to create a fifth column, sleeper agents, you’re funding them, you’re setting them up. Sometimes when you breed a mad attack dog which has a lot of little weird attack dog puppies, those attack dogs can kind of run loose and it’s hard to get control of them. That’s what I think happened in America with that whole situation. I think there’s wild attack dogs that were just on the loose [chuckling] and it’s been hard to clean up the mess that they’ve made. That’s what I think that whole nonsense was.

 

Joel Davis: Think about it. They didn’t want Trump to win in 2020. They’re dropping Covid pandemics, which had other purposes other than that, obviously. They’re dropping BLM riots, they’re burning down the cities of America. They’re completely rigging the election. They’re launching crazy psyops. Right? This time they just stood down and let him win.

 

So obviously he was allowed to win! Obviously, they wanted him to win this time because things have changed. There’s a shift in strategy and there’s a recognition that he’s the guy for, …

 

51 Why Trump was Put Back In

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be that they realised that it was inevitable that he would win, that., …

 

Joel Davis: No! It wasn’t inevitable! They could easily have just rigged it again. They actually undermined Biden too, and took him out before the election was even going to happen.

 

Blair Cottrell: I disagree. I disagree. I think they need to maintain, at least ostensibly, some semblance of legitimacy. They can’t just keep rigging every election, obviously. Right?

 

[1:31:02]

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t though. I’m not saying this election was rigged, but what I’m saying is that they stood down, they didn’t obstruct him from winning this time because Israel got attacked. Biden wasn’t doing enough to protect Israel and the Democrats weren’t. Because the rise of China, issues with Russia. The American foreign policy was not working under the old paradigm. And there was a recognition that they needed to switch to a more realist framework that Trump was providing. Trump was going to provide the leadership that was going to bring people., … No one was signing up to the military anymore. We’re veering towards a potential World War III scenario, but no one wants to join the military. Need to wind the woke back, need to get Americans, you know, back behind their government, back behind their president, back into the military. Trump was just gloating today in a press conference with the German Chancellor Merz. They’re saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the 80th anniversary of D-Day.”

 

Or whatever. And he’s like:

 

“That wasn’t a good day for you, was it?”

 

And then Merz was like:

 

“No, well, no, it was a great day for us because you saved us from the Nazi dictatorship!”

 

And Trump’s like:

 

“Oh, yeah, of course!”

 

But Trump was saying you know, that the Germans need to do what he’s done to replenish their military, that no one wants to fight for Germany right now because they don’t have any spirit. He’s like:

 

“What we have done, we’re recruiting like crazy right now because we’ve brought the spirit back.”

 

And that’s obviously, the spirit comes, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the spirit comes back to the Germans?

 

Joel Davis: There’s a recognition in the American Deep State that you need to have Trump running it to get the goys back on the team! White men are not playing for the team anymore. And they can’t run a global empire without the White guys running the companies running the military and so on. Rank and file. White men are the foundation of American power. And if you alienate them, America is no longer able to run the world. That’s why he was allowed to win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. But there’s people that play all sides, obviously, and if they predict or are able to understand that somebody’s rise is inevitable and can no longer be sort of, the floodgates have to come down and something needs to be allowed to happen, then it’s going to happen on their terms. Still, it’s a mistake to believe that there are sort of world players controlling literally everything in politics. Like, politics is a bit of a chaotic place and, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but this is national power plays in American politics. Like you could see before Israel was attacked on, was it October 7, 2023, Trump was behind Biden in the polls and was basically consistently behind Biden in all the polls for three years. Then as soon as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember the polls before the 2016 Trump election? Was it 2015 or 2016? 2016, wasn’t it? The polls had Hillary at like 90% one week before the election.

 

52 The Role of October 7 and Trump

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, because they miscalculated. But the thing is, the polls were accurate this time. And the polls were accurate this time. And what it showed was that basically after October 7th, then all of a sudden the media, the jewish media, start attacking Biden. Rather than covering Biden’s arse for being fucking, basically off with the fairies and senile, they stopped covering his arse and they started exposing him to scrutiny, because Biden wasn’t playing ball for Netanyahu in Israel. It was very clear to see. And then Trump started getting boosted.

 

They had Trump by the balls. They had him in court over so many different court cases, it was looking like they were going to throw him in prison. So he couldn’t even, I mean he could still run from prison technically, but he’s probably not going to win the presidency from a prison cell. They had Trump by the balls, and then all of a sudden Supreme Court decision bails him out! This is after October 7th and then boom! Like Trump comes back and you know, Elon Musk buys Twitter, gets behind him, all the big jew donors get behind him, hundreds of millions get dropped behind him and then it looks like Trump is inevitable and then everyone goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, Trump was always going to win!”

 

But no, I was following this for years. It looked like there’s no, Trump might have been the Republican nominee, it looked like Trump was going to be thrown in prison.

 

So they had Trump fucked and then they let him off. They let him win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, I trust your judgement because I know that you follow American politics a lot more closely than I do. The awkward situation now though, it seems for America, but for the world, or especially probably starting with America as a balancing act that needs to be struck with American culture where some sort of re-nationalised spirit, as you put it, needs to be helped to resurface without the country becoming ethnically nationalist at the same time. Which I think is its easy to do that in America, isn’t it? Because America is so multi-ethnic, whereas it’s not so easy to do in other countries. And that’s the balancing act that I suppose the Trump administration is going to try to strike for various reasons. Obviously they need to recruit more soldiers, police, etc. So interesting to see how that pans out.

 

[1:35:58]

 

53 Taking the Boot off the Neck of Whites

top

 

Joel Davis: They’re obviously taking the boot off the neck of Whites and they’re throwing bones to Whites at the moment. The political elements that are more conservative, the obstructions have been taken out of their ways obviously, like Leftists are still against them for ideological reasons. But the dirty tricks that were being played before stop being played. They got out of the way. The key power players.

 

And then you start seeing Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, these guys were funding Biden and funding the election security efforts and so on in 2020 and all that kind of thing, censoring Trump off all their platforms and so on. They’re all at the inauguration, they’re all shaking hands with Trump this time. There was a total sea change in the attitude of these elites. And there’s a reason for that. It doesn’t just happen because “the people” decided that they wanted him to be president. The people didn’t really change their perspective at all! It was the elites that changed their perspective, from my stance. But yeah, anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

 

54 Joel Will Be on with Thomas777 Re Philosophical Anti-Semitism, etc.

top

 

I see people saying:

 

“For real though, Joel is rocking the Thomas777 look!”

 

Well, actually I was just talking to Thomas earlier. I think Monday night Australian time, Monday morning American time. We’re going to do a, another collab. We’re going to talk about philosophical anti-semitism. We’re going to talk about Martin Heidegger. We’re going to get into the weeds of political philosophy and you know, NS philosophy and its precursors and so on. So it should be interesting stream for those who are looking for something a little bit intellectual. But our way inclined. Thomas is always an enjoyable collaborator. I’ve done a lot of podcasts with him over the years. He’s a good friend. So I’ll put up a link for that when the time comes. But yeah, like I said, Monday night, I think Monday morning America time.

 

People are saying that you were trying to speak but you’re muted.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just realised that before. But that’s okay. I was just saying that it’s curious. Oh, it’s not really curious. It doesn’t even, it doesn’t need to be said. It’s fine. That’s why I didn’t even pick up on it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. I was looking at at something else. I wasn’t looking at the screen. Is there another, any other subjects for us to cover?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t think so. I’ve had a busy week so I only got a couple of days to actually spend or maybe a day and a half where I actually had time enough to post to my social media this week. But I’m going to look at spending a bit more time making some more clip content and putting some more stuff out there. So I’m looking forward to that.

 

But I think we, what do we do? We did the NSN banner drop at Northland Shopping Centre. We did the speculation around that, or not speculation, just discussion around the response. Then we did Elon versus Trump. What else has happened the last week? Is there anything else?

 

55 Thomas Sewell on the Ex-UFC Fighter Jake Shields Show

top

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think of any like huge stories. I see Anthony Scalise saying:

 

“Joel, any information on the Jake Shields collab?”

 

Yeah, Tom recorded a podcast with Jake Shields on the Jake Shields Show this week. I don’t know exactly when that is going to be released but I think soon. So obviously it’s already been recorded. So that’s an interesting one.

 

Obviously I’ve been on Jake’s podcast before. He’s a friend. And yeah it’s great, it’s great that he’s has platform Ed not only me, but Tom as well. That he’s platforming Australian nationalists. You know, ex-UFC fighter. No, he’s not a Nazi. He’s not as radical as us, but he’s at least open to like hearing our perspective and platforming our perspective. And you know he’s always very critical of jewish power and he’s sympathetic towards pro-White politics. So you know, it’s nice to have a platform like that to break the siege. Obviously we’re under censorship, pretty heavy censorship. Tom and I and you, some of the most censored people in the world. Like we’re censored from fucking everything!

 

56 Still Banned from X Jew to Oz Government Pressure

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So yeah, that’s what I was going to say. It’s like, I hope that Tom took the opportunity to try to put the message out there. And, I don’t know, maybe Jake can help put pressure on the right people to get us back on X. Because it sucks not being on X! It sucks not being part of the conversation around the world. You know, Telegram these days, Telegram was pretty big during Covid I remember a lot of people came to Telegram to get their news during the Covid era, the lockdowns and all that shit! But these days, everyone’s kind of moved on from Telegram. There’s still the kind of little small loyalist following that I have on there, but it’s just not the reach is nowhere near what it would be if we could get on X as well.

 

And as I just mentioned earlier, it’s a really unfair ban, I think. I mean, you look at the kind of stuff that’s posted on X, and especially the content I was putting out there, it wasn’t even that bad. It’s obviously like part of some contrived effort or pressure.

 

Joel Davis: The Australian government requested that we be banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t have any evidence of that, but it looks that way. It’s kind of obvious that that’s what happened because we all got taken down at the same time. All our appeals got ignored! We haven’t even had a single. I haven’t had a single reply. Have you had a reply from X staff?

 

Joel Davis: No! Usually when you get banned, they send you an email saying you’ve been banned. I didn’t even get that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct! I didn’t get that either. And I haven’t had a single, I’ve appealed a few times, haven’t had a single reply. They’re just like, fuck you! It’s like, what do I actually even do to get banned? Bullshit!

 

We were in the gym, Joel and I, just having a conversation, and some young guys overheard our conversation and they approached us and said:

 

“Hey, do you guys have social media? Where can we find you guys?”

 

And we had to tell them:

 

“Well, we’re kind of banned off everything. We have Rumble.”

 

They didn’t even know what Rumble was. And they said:

 

“Are you on X?”

 

And we said:

 

“No, we’re banned off X.”

 

And they laughed and said:

 

“How did you get banned off X?”

 

And I realised that to the standard person, X just seems to be a place where you can say whatever you want. So they’re like:

 

“Wow, what the hell did you post to get banned off X?”

 

They assume that you’ve posted something really bad, like gore or hectic shit that no one would want to see! But it wasn’t that. It was just because we are dissidents in Australia. It’s because the Australian government requested to X that we were banned. And it’s like, it made me realise how kind of like forced into the corner we are down here in Australia.

 

57 The Censorship is Preventing Them from Being a Sought After Voice in Oz

top

 

And what’s most frustrating I reckon. I don’t know if this is like big noting myself, but I could say the same for Joel, I think. If it wasn’t for all the censorship, I’m quite confident that I would still be one of the most sought after voices for just general commentary in this country. Because the following I had before I was banned was massive! I used to get the same reach as Channel 9, 7 and 10 put together on Facebook, at least, when I was allowed to use Facebook back in the day. And I would have only grown from there. I get banned and then Avi Yemeni kind of takes my place and all the former audience I used to have just watch him because there’s no one else to watch anymore.

 

That’s the problem with censorship. Like, you get kind of like taken off the table or off the stage, screen, whatever, and some like bullshit jewish Israel shill takes your place and just talks some shit and sort of spells the audience and misleads them, takes their money for all sorts of nefarious purposes:

 

“Guys, I’m in the back of a police car. You need to donate to my legal fund right now!”

 

You know, it’s like the results of the censorship have been dreadful! And it works, doesn’t it? Censorship? It really does.

 

[1:43:51]

 

 

58 Avi Yemeni Scamming His Supporters

top

 

Joel Davis: How is he getting thrown? How’s he getting arrested? They don’t even take his phone off him. Like, get fucking! That’s obviously, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You know what they did? I know this too. Like, I heard about this. I wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true too. That video, I think it was a few years ago where Avi Yemeni claimed he had been arrested unfairly because he was just trying to report on something. It might have been a lockdown rally or something. He was in the back of a police car instantly demanding money for a legal fund because the police had arrested him. They literally just drove him down the street and just dropped him up the next suburb. They didn’t even really arrest him, they just took him down the road. And everyone who donated just got fleeced! Just got fucking scammed! And that’s so sad, man, that people are trying to do the right thing. They’re believing in something, they want to support someone who they believe is representing them. And that’s what happens. You just get some jewish Israel shill taking your money and laughing at you. That’s what Avi does. He takes people’s money and he laughs at them. So it’s a shame, but that’s the kind of that censorship has facilitated.

 

59 Despite Censorship Our Recognition in the Public is Growing

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I mean, even despite the censorship, we still go insanely viral all the time. Like, I was talking to some family members of mine, I won’t say who, younger guys the other day, and one of them was like:

 

“Oh, Joel. All the kids at school were like, watching this video and then they were showing it to me and it was you talking about Hitler! And I was like, ‘that’s my cousin!’.”

 

And then my other cousin goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s like I saw this other video of you talking about Hitler on TikTok the other day. It had like millions of likes.”

 

I was like:

 

“Okay, I don’t even know what video that is.”

 

But, I mean, that’s pretty funny. Like I hear people say that all the time. They saw me on Instagram, they saw me on TikTok. I don’t even have accounts on these platforms. It’s just other people reposting it.

 

So obviously, even despite the censorship that we have, by being organically interesting we’re still known out there. Every time I go out in Sydney or Melbourne, if I go out to the city for a drink or something, at least one person comes up to me and recognises me and says:

 

“Oh, hey, it’s great to meet you. Keep doing what you’re doing, if not more.”

 

We’ve become infamous in Australia, or maybe famous, you could say, even in Australia, despite everything, despite how we’ve been treated.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I know that you like to look at the glass half full, which is what you’re doing now, but I realised you are right, now that I think about it. When I said censorship works, it works at first! It works to sort of not nullify, but significantly reduce your reach, but only for a year or two. And then gradually, if you’re consistent and if you try to find every way around the censorship possible. Yeah, you do you become more infamous. You become even more sought after, I think.

 

And the longer and more aggressively you’re censored, the more consistent you are in response to that, the more infamous you can potentially become. So it’s kind of like that real cliche saying that tyranny actually just feeds tyrants and censorship is a form of modern tyranny, which in the long run actually just feeds more people into our audience basket.

 

[1:47:25]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think so. I think if we had no censorship we’d have a much bigger viewership.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously it’d just grow faster. It just grow more organically. Right? But think of it like this. Think of it like a weed. I’m not saying that we’re like a weed, but that’s how the government views us. And they’re spraying us with poison. That’s what censorship is. And it, like, prevents us from growing, but it doesn’t kill us. We actually just start adapting to the poison and then they have to spray us with a lot more poison to get the same effect that they got previously. Then that poison doesn’t work. So they’ve got to go for some higher grade shit!

 

But all that’s actually happening is we’re adapting. We’re being forced to adapt the organism that we are to the circumstances imposed on us. That’s what censorship kind of forces you to do. I suppose.

 

60 Surviving the Censorship Because What We Have to Say is So Interesting

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I mean, the only reason that we’re able to get around, like, pretty much no one would be able to survive this level of censorship. The only reason that we can is because we’re just that interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: And also very autistic. So we don’t really feel emotionally crushed by it. You know, it’s kind of like:

 

“Oh we got censored again. Okay.”

 

It’s like, [chuckling] you don’t really get disheartened by it, right?

 

61 Censorship Does Make It Hard to Recruit People Because They Don’t Know How to Join

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think it’s more that we’re so motivated by our cause that we’re not going to stop.

 

But yeah, the main effect of censorship is actually this. Actually we managed to get out there and still be known and get talking points out there, get attention. But what’s difficult is recruiting people to our organisation because people will see a clip, people will see a news broadcast, they’ll see us, they’ll be aware that we exist. But they won’t really know:

 

“Okay, how do I go and like, join these guys or find out more?”

 

And if they go to look online to try and find out more, it’s hard to actually find the details. So that’s the main difficulty.

 

62 the System is Afraid of Us Recruiting Thousands of Men

top

 

It’s that it’s actually preventing us from recruiting effectively and that’s obviously why they do it, because what they’re really afraid of, it’s not just us being popular, people watching our videos. What they’re really afraid of is us building a movement of thousands and thousands of men. That’s what they’re petrified of!

 

And so that’s what their efforts are all about. Whether it be the way, how heavily we’re policed to try and intimidate people out of getting involved in the movement whether it be the way they go after people try and like take away their livelihoods. Censorship, all of it centres around trying to create obstacles for us to recruit people where the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s truek.

 

Joel Davis: Making as difficult as possible to get a bunch of nationalists in the same room or the same place together.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s part of the government’s counter extremist efforts, which are, I’ve said previously, are just repurposed counterinsurgency.

 

The point is to prevent you from appealing to the public and then especially from recruiting from the public, or for recruiting from the public.

 

So what happens is if you’re a dissident, one that can potentially threaten the current regime, you get classed as an “extremist” and then you’re susceptible or targeted by counter extremist measures which include censorship, harassment ostracism from society, losing bank account, blah, blah, blah, the list goes on and on.

 

But as I’ve said, that’s not actually legal to do that in a democracy.

 

So eventually names, identities of people who are responsible for actually directing certain government agencies or setting up and being involved in government agencies that are doing that to Australian citizens, that are classifying them as extremists, basically stripping all their rights away and then just harassing and bullying them, preventing them from participating in society on a normal level. Eventually those people will be brought to justice.

 

63 Communists and Other Anti-Racist Activists Have Embedded Themselves Within Our Key Institutions

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And that’s the thing, that’s what Australians don’t realise. There are communists and other anti-racist activists that have embedded themselves within our key institutions, not just at the academic level but at the policing level. And they’re engaging in political policing under the auspices of so-called “Counter Terrorism” measures. We’re not terrorists by any definition of that term. And even the head of ASIO has agreed with this multiple times under Senate scrutiny that we’re not terrorists and we can’t be classified as terrorists, we don’t engage in terroristic activity.

 

But then they go:

 

“But oh, you’re extremist!”

 

What is an extremist? I saw an old interview, actually, of you and Tom from way back in the day, Blair, on a Current Affair, talking about African crime actually, I think it was from like 2019 or something. And they accused you of being an extremist. And what Tom said was that:

 

“An extremist is just someone who takes an idea to its logical conclusion.”

 

And that’s literally all it is. It’s just taking an idea that seriously that you 100% believe in it, rather than being like these politicians who claim to have a whole set of different ideals but don’t take them to their logical conclusion, either because they don’t have the ideals, or because if you actually took them to their logical conclusion there’ll be very bad ideals. Like when it comes to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But it depends on what the logical conclusion is, though.

 

[1:52:40]

 

64 Because We Have Ideals They Call That “Extremism”

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But if you take Leftism to its logical conclusion, it would result in basically exterminating White people, like in a very aggressive way.

 

And if you took our ideas to their logical conclusion, it would basically restore Australia to being a great country, across every metric and make your life, if you’re a normal White person, so much better than it is right now. But that’s what we’re guilty of we’re just guilty of actually having ideals and they call that “extremism”.

 

So basically what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to make it illegal essentially for you to have Right-wing ideals, for you to take the ideals of nationalism to the logical conclusion. Now they don’t have Left-wing extremism. Even though there’s Left-wingers that are engaging in political violence on a frequent basis, who harbour genocidal hatred. They’re allowed to take their ideas to their logical conclusion. So it’s a complete double standard! It’s a totally arbitrary standard applied ideologically just to be persecute the ideological enemies of the regime, of the current ruling class. An ideology which the majority of Australians don’t subscribe to and are actually offended by. But nevertheless because they control the levers of power and because of mass apathy and a mixture of apathy and demoralisation and disorganisation, they’re able to get away with it for now.

 

65 the System Calling Us “Extremists” to Justify Their Own Lawfare and Extremism Against Us

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s why they come up with certain arbitrary terms in order to justify the sort of action that they take against dissidents such as extremists. Because lawfully extremist doesn’t mean the same as terrorists, does it? They know we’re not terrorists! They know I’m not a terrorist. They know you’re not a terrorist, as you said. The head of ASIO has publicly stated that these guys aren’t terrorists due to Senate inquiries or whatever the hell is going on there.

 

But they still need to try to justify the sort of measures that they take in order to prevent us from appealing or recruiting from the public. Appealing to or recruiting from the public, which, as I said is the whole point of counterinsurgency. So any sort of language, any sort of phraseology they can come up with to justify extreme censorship ostracism, bullying, bully tactics lawfare, all the sorts of stuff that we’ve experienced.

 

66 Blair Barred from a Tafe Course Because Minorities Might Be “Unsafe”

top

 

Like, I can’t even go to a school. I think I went to a TAFE to try to do a Cert 4. You know what happened? The course leader, after about four weeks, told me that:

 

“I had to withdraw from the course because my identity had been discovered and minority students in the classroom may be exposed to an unsafe learning environment.”

 

It’s [chuckling] like just because my name’s Blair Cottrell! That’s why I’m not allowed to go to a TAFE in Australia right now, in democracy. And they know that I’m not going to hurt anyone. They know that I don’t have a history of that kind of thing in politics. But that’s not what’s important. What’s important is how they can come up with the sort of language and phraseology to justify pushing me out of society! To make sure that I never appeal to anyone! Because my ideas are dangerous for the current system. The way the system is currently set up.

 

But yeah, it’s a system that needs to change.

 

67 Superchats

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, while you fix that microphone [Blair bumped it], I think we’ll get into the Superchats. You can send a Superchat on Rumble. I don’t think you can send them on Odysee anymore. You can send them only on Rumble or on EntropyStream dot Live slash Joel Davis.

 

Anyway, we’ve got a few here already. One from Calmius saying:

 

“Blair, what’s the story of your beanie?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It was given to me by someone I knew quite a while ago. I don’t know if it was handmade. I can’t remember. But it’s so absurd that I tend not to wear it in public. This is something that I put on, … Can you guys hear me? Okay? I had to plug my microphone back In. I knocked it off the stand. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Same as before. I don’t know if it’s been picked up. Yeah.

 

But yeah, there’s not a great story behind it. It’s just an orange beanie with. What do you call this? Do you call that a pom. A pom pom? [chuckling] I don’t know what that is.

 

Yeah. But I just, I’ve stopped caring so much about how I look and so I don’t really care. I’m just wearing it because it was cold tonight. I don’t know what you want me to say. It’s just a beanie, bro.

 

Joel Davis: It’s all that deep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Rygo Weber said:

 

“Once again, great show guys. What do you think about the Trump and Elon spat?”

 

Well, we already got into that. So you don’t really need to answer it again. If you watch the show, we discussed it for like 20 minutes. Comfy Friend said:

 

“Great show!”

 

And shout out to Comfy Friend broadcasting the show on his X. Much appreciated. Zero seven to all the Comfy Friend viewers this evening. Of course the show’s on Rumble. It’s on Odysee and back on X for now.

 

So thanks for that man. I appreciate it. He does a good job shilling our shit collectively on X with all of us banned.

 

So you can follow Comfy Friend on X to still get your dose of NSN. Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell, Tom Sewell content. Jacob Hersant content as well:

 

“You will never have children!”

 

Spiteful mutant supporter said:

 

“Capitalism has made it this way. Old fashioned fascism will take it away.”

 

68 Superchat – Left Wing and Right Wing Views on Capitalism

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I always get a little bit awkward when someone just blames everything on capitalism. It seems like an oversimplification to me. What do you think, Joel?

 

[1:58:50]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah, but it’s definitely a dynamic. I mean but there’s a distinction between I think like a Left-wing and a Right-wing criticism of capitalism. So generally Left-wing criticisms of capitalism have to do with exploitation. This idea that, oh there’s all these fat cats that are making all this money at the expense of everyone. And basically the implication is that if we could just somehow like divide up the benefits more equitably that it would be okay.

 

Obviously there’s other Left-wing critiques, like you know, the idea that commodification is culturally destructive or environmentally destructive, but that they would share with like Right-wing critiques of capitalism.

 

But, a more Right-wing critique of capitalism would be double pronged. One that capitalism as a structure elevates the wrong kind of people into political leadership. So under like a feudal society where you had like an aristocracy, the selection pressures on leaders were different and we had basically warriors, men who fought with honour who passed down their titles intergenerationally and raised their children through good breeding but also through good rearing to become, to develop a kind of honour based, you know, moral code and to rule with an honour based, you know, warrior code. And therefore that created a more virtuous society.

 

Where under capitalism you have all these merchants that simply gain political power because they made a lot of money. And the attributes that make you successful in business don’t necessarily make you an honourable man and therefore you don’t have an honourable government. That’s like a Right-wing critique of capitalism.

 

Or another Right-wing critique of capitalism would be that the process of commercialisation is destructive to folkways, to culture. That when everything becomes commodified and you have this kind of global marketplace that it breaks down the local traditions and forms of identity and globalises and abstracts everything out into this like universal, into like universal individual units. And we basically lose all connection with who we really are. And as a result our moral and cultural fabric like disintegrates. I think I agree with these criticisms. And that doesn’t mean that we should, become communists, obviously! There’s a false dichotomy between capitalist and communist.

 

The alternative is not necessarily to abolish money or abolish property or something. That’s not the issue. The issue with capitalism is in that some people are rich and some people are poor. The issue are these other things. It’s about how do you create a political system that basically ensures that virtuous honourable men maintain leadership and rule and hold other elements to account that everything doesn’t get relativised in terms of “what’s good for business”. And secondarily, how do you preserve the culture of your people from being liquidated into this global marketplace? How do you stop commodification and preserve some kind of sacredness and tradition?

 

And obviously National Socialism, political ideology tries to do this,

 

69 Francis Yockey’s Description of Socialism Versus Capitalism in His Book Imperium

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Mandatory military service. You can start with that. And no one holds office without having done their military service and have achieved a certain rank perhaps. I reckon that’s a good start.

 

But I like Francis Yockey’s description of socialism versus capitalism in his book Imperium, where he basically insinuates that capitalism represents one aspect of human nature and so it’s impossible to actually eliminate it because it represents the selfish motivation which is half the reason anyone ever does anything. If you make it so people can’t actually advance their own interests, then you kill the incentive to actually do anything. Because no one wants to do anything if it’s purely just in the interests of the community and not themselves. Because as humans we have to see some sort of benefit, individual benefit in things that we do.

 

He summarises that capitalism means basically every man for himself, whereas the opposing view, socialism, the opposing economic system of socialism, is the other form of human nature, which is to do things for the advancement of the community in spite of oneself sometimes, which again can be half the reason we’re doing things at the same time. So I like that summary because it’s more personable. It sort of gets more into the nature of people and the compulsion, the motivation that goes beyond just economics and financial considerations of why people do things.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like we talk about the problems with individualism but at the same time also value liberty. Like anyone, I think like most people, most Anglo Saxons. I don’t like excessive bureaucracy and over regulation of everything. I like for normal people to be largely left alone to their own devices, to choose their own destinies up to a level. Obviously you need to put hard limits on that. But where possible, it’s good to basically bias towards freedom and have to justify it away rather than the reverse.

 

But having said that, like liberalism as an ideological framework has been obviously disastrous for our people. So it needs to be attacked at its root. And people have to come before our individual freedom ultimately.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. I was about to say that. I think politically we need to be more socialist than we are capitalists because the more socialist you are, the more you’re considering the effect on the broader community and the future generations rather than just how you are benefiting now in the moment or how you’re affected by anything happening in the moment.

 

And obviously if you’re dealing with the future of a country, you need to be more socialist in your considerations. And that’s all socialism actually means at the end of the day is considering how anything may affect the greater ethnic community. The problem with communism though is it doesn’t really consider socialism from an ethnic perspective. It doesn’t consider the group as, …

 

Joel Davis: Universal humanity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. It’s universal and it’s also class based which is just like a different form of looking at humanity on a universal basis.

 

[2:05:42]

 

70 Marx and the Destruction of Classes

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The reason why Marx identifies the proletariat as the revolutionary subject of history is not because he wants them to stay the proletariat, but because the proletariat, the working class, is being exploited by capitalism. He sees it as the vehicle to the destruction of classes.

 

So the ideal of Marxism is to abolish class and to end in a kind of, in like a universal humanity where we’re all on the same level. Like it’s about destroying the category of bourgeoisie, entirely. It doesn’t have this like perennial mindset that there’ll always be workers versus capitalists that will go on forever. Like obviously the idealist from the Marxist standpoint is to overthrow it.

 

But, whereas I think our view from the Right because we’re realists is more that like what you were saying before, that the forces that are imbued within capitalism they’re part of human nature and that they’ll always have some kind of representation within society. And it’s about trying to get the balance right. You’re never going to be able to ultimately decide on one or the other extreme. That’s kind of irrational utopianism.

 

But instead you kind of have to just take human nature for what it is and try and balance these forces as best you can. That’s a more Right-wing perspective.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. That’s definitely the attitude that’s the position I would take right now based on my understanding.

 

71 Superchat: is Techno Trance and EDM the Most Aryan Music Around?

top

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. All right. Superchat Aussie Artist 88 said:

 

“Blair bro, is techno trance and EDM the most Aryan music around? It’s the natural evolution of the Germanic spirit. Fast paced and yet spiritual. What’s your opinion?”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never thought of it that way, but maybe that’s a really interesting perspective. I can tell you no other genre of music makes me feel what I feel when I listen to really good trance and electronic dance music. Like that stuff just invigorates me in a way that’s difficult to explain through words. So it’s very possible. I do feel like it hits me on another level. One that’s hard to express. What do you think, Joel? You’re into your music a little bit, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think, I mean the most Aryan music, I mean you’ve got classical music, you’ve got like heavy metal, all the different sub genres of metal. You’ve got electronic music. You know, they’re all different like phases in technology. Like Wagner couldn’t have started a metal band because electric guitars didn’t exist yet, you know. And then I don’t know, Slayer, I mean obviously there was like synthesisers and stuff, but they didn’t have like the apparatus that you use to make electronic music wasn’t fully developed yet and it’s produces different genres. So it’s like when Aryans are dealing with electronic instruments, they make a certain kind of music. When they’re dealing with electric instruments, they make another kind of music. When they’re dealing with pre-electric instruments, they make another kind of music. You know, that’s how I see it. I don’t think it makes sense to like try and argue, one is more airing than the other. It’s like all of them are expressions of our spirit. All of them are expressions of our racial nature.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think someone just really appreciates like trance music. I can say this. A thought occurred to me as I was listening to Joel just then that I think a lot of trance music, if you listen or pay attention to the structure of how the track develops, it’s basically, and I’m not trying to be vulgar with this is a very objective analysis. It’s how sex would sound to the soul. It’s almost like the process of sex put into audio form, if you understand what I mean. Like, I don’t know how to explain it exactly, but there’s like that build up or the process.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, kind of orgasmic quality.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Reaching that climax point and then the climax point hits and it hits really hard. And that is the sort of pinnacle of the track. Just like that is the pinnacle of the experience that you have through sex. I think maybe that’s why it makes us feel a certain way that other music can’t really.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, there’s an ecstatic, there’s an ecstatic quality to it. That’s what’s appealing about it. I think that ecstatic quality is can also be found in psychedelic forms of guitar based music as well.

 

But yeah, it definitely comes through. And the lines get blurred sometimes between electronic instruments and those kinds of genres as well, particularly in recent decades. Like the kind of like music that’s categorised as goth in that spectrum, for example, often blurs the lines between those categories.

 

But yeah, I enjoy all, basically all of those genres of music. I’m glad that they all exist. They all represent different emotions. Like metal is like more epic! It’s kind of like music of like war and aggression and intensity and horror and all those kinds of spectrum of emotions. And you’ve got like gothic and alternative rock genres that have kind of romantic quality to them but they also have psychedelic quality. And then electronic music is like m can often be more ecstatic! Yeah.

 

[2:11:05]

 

72 Music Can “Spell” Us in the Same Way as a Good Speech

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it true that music can spell us in the same way that a good speech can? It’s a similar type of magic or has a similar type of effects on people. And I realised that young.

 

And one of my secrets when I was learning about public speaking was I used to study certain songs that would make me feel a certain way. And I thought:

 

“Wow, maybe I can create a speech or practise roughly the way I can deliver a speech, or a method through which I can deliver a speech where I can incorporate the same melody, or a similar melody to what I’m hearing in this song and put that melody into the words I’m speaking.”

 

So I think, there’s something to be said about that and there’s probably some sort of underground science where you can get into that and study it. I didn’t really get into anything underground but I just made the connection as a result of my own, you know, learning when I was a bit younger.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well music is the language of the soul. You know, it has like the ability to say things that words can’t. Or maybe words can say it but they can’t really convey it in the same way that that music can because it’s more, viscerally emotive.

 

This is why I think like Schopenhauer’s view on music is utterly retarded! Because for Schopenhauer music was supposed to be like a method by which we could disconnect, from like the life force and disconnect from like the drives and will embedded in the body and achieve some kind of like mystical, you know, disinterested union with the absolute or whatever. And I find generally what’s great about music is precisely the opposite. That music is the life force made manifest in its most potent form. I guess on that side I would side with Nietzsche against Schopenhauer*.

 

[*Nietzsche criticised Schopenhauer’s pessimistic view of life and suffering, advocating instead for an artistic and affirmative approach to existence. He believed that embracing suffering could lead to personal growth and strength, contrasting with Schopenhauer’s call for resignation and detachment from desires.]

 

73 Sargon of Akkad Having an Event in Australia

top

 

But yeah, anyway, Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Have you seen Tom Roussell, also known as Survive the Jive and Sargoy of Akkad are speaking in Australia later this year. Sargoy is getting more based lately and Survive the Jive has always been solid.”

 

Yeah, I did see that. There is an event. I think they’re almost sold out. They only had 100 tickets for sale and they were selling them for like a thousand bucks each or something. So meant to be like an exclusive event.

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it Sargon of Akkad. Why is he Sargoy of Akkad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s obviously a joke. Yeah, people used to call him Sargoy of Mossad well back in the day. Sargoy of Mossad. It’s pretty funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is he called that though? Is it speculated, has he been accused?

 

Joel Davis: Well, back in the day, lately he has been better. But back in the day he was a big defender of classical liberalism. He always get into debates with people from the so-called Alt-Right. There was one really famous debate that he had with Richard Spencer back in the day, like 2018 era, something like that. Maybe 2017. I can’t remember the exact year, but it was back in that era. And, yeah, he was kind on the other side of the fence.

 

Whereas lately he’s kind of come more around. Not all the way, but he’s come a lot closer to like defending ethno-nationalism. Like he’ll defend ethno-nationalism like 90% now.

 

So yeah, I don’t think that he’s like an agent of the jews or something. I think he’s just a temperamental conservative. He’s a bit cucked because he’s just a temperamental conservative. But some of the people that he platforms on his Lotus Eater podcast platform that he runs, some of them aren’t bad, some of them kind of suck. Some of them are pretty good. Young, kind of like blonde Aryan English guys who are obviously our guys. A few of them, I won’t name names but you know, had some good interactions with some of them on Twitter over the years before I was banned.

 

So yeah, I don’t have anything against him. He seems like a nice guy. I think he I think his heart’s in the right place, but he’s just a little bit cucked, obviously, for my liking, but he’s all right.

 

As for Survive the Jive, he does good stuff. I’ve always enjoyed his YouTube channel. Have you ever seen his YouTube videos? He talks a lot about you know, Anglo and Germanic and Nordic history and ancient Paganism, things like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: A little bit. Yeah. A little bit. I was gonna say that. Seems like the boys have been successful on the bullying front with a Sargoy of Akkad. [chuckling] You know, with all the names and the pressure. It’s funny to see stuff like that build on some content creators and influencers who are obviously very in love. Not in love they’re very attached to their online Persona, whatever it is that they’ve created for themselves. They’ve managed to dodge the censorship and try to be reasonable or whatever, but through just chipping away through effective bully measures, the boys just managed to shove them in the right direction, gradually!

 

Joel Davis: I saw people complaining that they got banned from my Telegram chat. Look, I got a lot of moderators. It probably wasn’t me, but I’ll tell you this. If you send a Superchat with your Telegram app, I’ll unban it. That’s the deal. It’s a guarantee you can buy your way back in!

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel!

 

Joel Davis: There you go.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m surprised. I didn’t think Joel would be so easily sway with money.

 

[2:16:20]

 

Joel Davis: But if you post garbage, you might get banned again. So watch yourself. It doesn’t guarantee you a permanent residency, but you can buy a second chance. At The Joel and Blair Show, we believe in second chances.

 

Soul Vinda said:

 

“Amazing aesthetics on that NSN edit. This is the spirit that will win over the motivated youth.”

 

Yeah, it was a sick edit. I think it might have been Gus who made it. I don’t know who made it, but I’m feeling it was Gus. Yeah, but it was a sick edit. Did you like it? Were you just blowing smoke up its arse because it was on the show? Be honest. Do you think it sucks?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no man! Did you see me dancing to it? That was shit was hype! Loved it. If it was Gus that made it, salute, bro! Excellent work! Some of these young guys are great on the edits. Yeah. I wouldn’t even know how they do it, to be honest. I used to think I was pretty good at editing and I can edit, like, videos, basic edits, but I wouldn’t even know how to produce shit like that these days. So it’s good stuff. It’s impressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t do that you should know me better than that. I don’t blow smoke up people’s asses. If you’re hearing me say something nice, it’s genuine, man! I don’t throw around false compliments. I always just try to find something about people I can appreciate. So that’s why sometimes I can come across as probably too nice. But no, yeah, I really did like the video.

 

74 Getting Around Censorship with Uploading Clips, Edits

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think Anderson puts out cool, cool edits. And yeah, that’s what you need.

 

By the way, those of you who are on TikTok, Instagram, whatever, Twitter, re-upload the edits and go find the old ones as well and spam them out there. Obviously we want you uploading clips from the show as well and other things, but get those hyper edits out there. Get, get some eyes on them! Put them particularly on places like TikTok and Instagram, where they’re gonna have more chance of going viral.

 

We’re just talking about censorship before. The main reason that we can get around censorship is part of it is through being provocative and interesting. But another massive component of it is you guys. You guys that are re-uploading content, clipping content, things like that, to make sure that even though we’re banned, the content lives on.

 

So I appreciate it. It’s one way that you can help the movement. Very easy way to help the movement is simply that.

 

Crafty Boom said:

 

“Lead the way, men. Let’s go!”

 

And Testy Testerson said:

 

“Buy a few beers on me.”

 

I see also on Entropy, Deer in the Headlights said:

 

“Carry on, gentlemen, you’re doing great work!”

 

And Shovelhead Amy said:

 

“Thanks for what you’re doing. From an avid listener here in Antario, Canada. People are paying attention.”

 

I should have said Ontario, sorry.

 

75 On Canadians and Australians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: What is with Canadians? Why do we vibe so hard with Canadians? What’s going on there? I think we’ve covered this on last couple of shows. I just keep seeing Canadians pop up all the time. And my heart goes out to Canada. They seem to be going through similar struggles and we seem to have, I don’t know, some sort of similarity between us Aussies and Canadians. They appreciate us and I appreciate them. So thanks, Canada. Thanks for watching.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but she said:

 

“From a true toque lover. Those are great toques.”

 

I wonder what a fucking “toque” is?:

 

“The consistency and level headedness that you men display is what people are Sorely craving. And I find it amusing that you call them beanies. It’s a toque. Toque is what we call them.”

 

Yeah, well we’re not fucking Canadians, so we call them beanies.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I thought? Toke, man! You know what I thought toke, meant? I thought it was a take, but it was like a take from someone that was like high on something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you give a bong head. Like “give us a toke”, that kind of thing. Yeah, no, we love Canadians. Canadians are kind of like nice versions of us. I think. They’re like, if Australians were nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the fact Canadians like us shows that perhaps they feel, I don’t know, there’s some deep appreciation for our nature and humour. So maybe they’re not as nice as they ostensibly seem or have a reputation for being. Maybe they have this like contained, …

 

Joel Davis: Unless they’re French-Canadians, they’re from the same stock. So I think they just kind of, they kind of understand us. They can, they have a similar national story. They come from the same root populations and so because of that ethnic connection, I think they can kind of understand where Australians are coming from, generally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would you agree they’re very sensible people. Canadians always seem to be well spoken, I mean it’s not always going to be the case. It’s going to be outliers. But all the Canadians that I know of, they’re well spoken, presentable, sensible, intelligent people. They’re always easy to respect.

 

76 Canadians and Scandinavians Are Too “Nice”. It’s Time to Get Savage

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you’ve kind of blown smoke up their arse a little bit now. They’re all right, they’re okay. They’re ookayy! Or whatever the fuck they say. I wish Canadians said “cunt” more! That’s my main critique of Canadians. I think there’s not enough vulgarity, not enough aggression. They’re too nice! It offends me as an Australian a little bit.

 

You know you see them, they got ice hockey going on, an aggressive national sport. If you look at their history, they’ve been great, they’ve got an incredible military history. They’re savages in their military history. Great, great victories in battle over the decades. So they’re obviously like, tough.

 

So I feel like they’re almost too nice. They’re kind of, almost like they let themselves be taken advantage of its like the great shame. Like it’s similar with Scandinavians, Scandinavians are so nice. And it’s a beautiful thing because that makes for a great society because if they’re living in a society full of their own kin, that pleasant nature, is fantastic!

 

But then under the current situation, it’s like, time to get mean! It’s time to get savage!

 

[2:22:57]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we must glorify hostility to outsiders. Hostility to outsiders must become a noble virtue, one expected of all of our kin.

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. Yes, it’s time to get mean Canadians! But Australia, I mean our issue is not so much that we’re too nice, it’s more that we’re too apathetic. We don’t care enough. That’s our problem, I think.

 

77 Superchat – Tips for Educating the Ladies on Our Politics?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Too cynical as well. Most Aussies think:

 

“It’s all going to go to shit anyway. And yeah nothing ever changes, so why bother?”

 

There’s a bit of cynicism there. But Aaron, 32, just sent through 10 bucks and he asked an interesting question. Joel, he asks:

 

“Any tips for educating the ladies on our politics? HH!”

 

I’m of the opinion you can’t really or shouldn’t bother too much. How should I phrase this? I found there’s no real use ranting about politics or trying to educate any woman on your political views. I mean, you can talk to a woman about politics if she really wants to talk about that. But generally speaking, it’s better to just lead by example. It’s better to take care of yourself, demonstrate that you can take care of yourself, be in good health, be smart, be able to provide something of value to the woman that she can see value in. I don’t know, it’s like I’ve never really seen much point in talking to women about politics, put it that way. It’s like not something that I’ve done a great deal because I see that they’re just not that interested. They’re usually interested in talking about other things.

 

And I talk about, think about politics all the time. It’s like I’m always inside my own head about it. And I network with and deal with people for political purposes all the time as well. It’s probably my primary interest still in life. And so at the end of the day, I don’t want to go home and sit with my girlfriend and talk about politics as well. I want to remove myself from that world. And I see women as being kind of outside of the world of politics. Almost like a period of relief from politics. That’s how I feel about it. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Personally, I never stop talking about the subjects that matter to me. So women are subjected to those same subjects. And usually if a woman likes me, then they want to hear about it anyway because they just kind of like hearing you mansplain. But it’s a distinction, I guess, between talking to women who don’t already like, want to have sex with you or are having sex with you, and talking like general women in the community. Because if a woman is into you, then she’ll just kind of go along like she’s probably go along with having a discussion about whatever you want to talk about because obviously you’ve got a close relationship. So I don’t think you really need advice on that. Just like, just talk about what you think.

 

But when it comes to general women, like out in the community, I think women respond better to putting things in the language of care. So talk about you know, talk about kind of like the Righteous reasons why certain people you care about are getting fucking over. Whether it be your family’s future, whether it be victims of immigrant crime, whatever, White people collectively, whatever. And talk about how you care about these groups and how that’s what motivates you and so on. I think that can bring you come across a lot more sympathetically and I think put it to them. If they challenge you, say:

 

“What about what this person has suffered? Or what about this group of people? Don’t they deserve this? Don’t they deserve that?”

 

Usually this kind of framing is more persuasive, I think, to the feminine psyche. Because the feminine psyche processes, you know, social realities more through that prism than maybe how you would talk about it with men. So I don’t know. That’s based my basic take. I mean, it’s kind of obvious, right? But it’s true.

 

Blair Cottrell: A woman just needs to be ethnically aware. Ethnically aware is kind of like bare minimum. If a woman is not ethnically aware, at least, it’s like I can’t even be bothered. I can’t be bothered even having a conversation with her about anything. Because women should have good instincts. It’s of the female nature to be in tune with one’s instinct rather than be intellectualising everything and being sort of consciously processing what they’re observing through their senses. Women are very instinctual creatures. And if a woman can’t even be in touch with their own ethnic identity. If she can’t even acknowledge it or feel connected to that, then it’s like too far gone, man! [chuckling] I just can’t deal with that.

 

Joel Davis: So I think women are also receptive to when, if you talk about like the issues with race mixing and like the desire to have children that, maintain your ancestry and that have certain traits that you have or that your family has, …

 

[2:28:21]

 

Blair Cottrell: Even the anti-racist ones, even the woman women who masquerade as anti-racists, as soon as you bring up the inheritance of certain ethnic traits that they possess, like they’re always very interested in children looking like them. Usually they’re interested in passing on their blue eyes or their blond hair. They want to do that! Which just goes to show their instinct always trumps whatever they say they believe, which is what I was trying to get at before. The words women speak is never as powerful or as effective or influential over their actions as their instinct.

 

78 Superchat – My Lefty Girlfriend Told Me That She Hates Jews

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I mean that’s definitely the case.

 

Anyway, Rigo Weber said:

 

“I just told my girlfriend that I’m currently looking into the true history of Hitler and the jews. And to my surprise, she told me that she hates jews. I found this surprising. And she’s always been a real Lefty.”

 

Well it’s not that surprising that Lefties are developing anti-semitic attitudes. I mean, generally Lefties they hate Israel. If they hate capitalism, they probably have noticed that a lot of these capitalists are jewish. There’s something jewish about capitalism, about international finance, etc.

 

So yeah, there’s certain demographics of people where it’s easier to talk to them about jews than it is to talk to them about race. And there’s other demographics where it’s easier to talk to them about race than about jews. And usually people that are more conservative, it’s easier to get to talk to them about race than it is about jews. And it’s easier inverse of people that are more of a Left-wing bias.

 

So yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. But yeah, I mean, if it’s your girlfriend, she’s gonna, even if she doesn’t agree with you, she’s gonna be open with you and like, she’s gonna trust you enough to say things that she wouldn’t say in polite company. Or she’ll like, hear you out, obviously, so you can be a lot more frank. You shouldn’t be afraid of being able to talk about how you really feel with your own girlfriend. That’s kind of fucked up!

 

79 Blair and Joel’s Interactions with Women

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never known a girl who’s like, strongly disagreed with me on anything. I’ve never been in an interaction with a female where we’ve argued about something like some social ideal, political idea, philosophy, nothing! I think when women like you, they tend to be more accepting of whatever it is you’re saying. They mimic your ideas. It’s always been really difficult for me to actually argue with a woman. I don’t even want to! Maybe that’s why. I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. I think usually I’ve always dated women who have similar political proclivities. Like, may not be like full Nazis or whatever, but they’ve always been pretty, like, Right-wing and so haven’t been offended by my views on things and then being exposed to me. Anyone who’s exposed to me on a long enough timeline basically becomes a Nazi.

 

So, yeah, whether I’m having sex or not.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you ever just asked people basic questions and watch them become frustrated by actually thinking about the answer to your question and realising how stupid it sounds?

 

Like, for example, you might be talking to some girl and she’s trying to tell you about how climate change is going to destroy the world or something. And you’ll ask her a simple question like:

 

“Okay, where did you get that information?”

 

And she’d be like:

 

“Oh, well, I was in university and this, like Professor told me.”

 

Or as part of some course or something like that. Okay:

 

“Well, where did that information come from, though? Where did they get it from?”

 

And they don’t actually, a lot of the time, like, as you just develop that line of questioning they get frustrated because they realise that it’s actually unreasonable to believe what they believe based on the sources that have, like, pass down that information to them because they can’t actually verify the sources. And by just asking them to explore those sources for a moment, they become visibly frustrated. Have you experienced that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so usually what has happened when I’ve been in social situations where there’s like, Leftist women, is they just kind of like start crying and then go to the bathroom or something. Or just basically act like as if I just did this horrible thing to them and then try and like act like a victim and then hope that someone like cucks out and sympathises with them because they’re not equipped to actually engage me in debate or critical discussion. That’s pretty much what happens every single time. So I think I have intimidating aura when it comes to debating. People don’t really like debating me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t get people who are like political to debate me at this point. Like no one wants to debate me, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everyone has their strengths and yours is arguing a point. And you know any person in touch with some semblance of common sense knows that there are some armies not to engage, there are some battles not to fight.

 

And one of the battles not to fight in my opinion is entering into open debate with Joel Davis! [chuckling] Yeah, everyone’s good at something.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, we’ve been going for two and a half hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

80 Update on Tom Sewell’s Court Case – Prosecution Will Drop Case If Doesn’t Claim Legal Fees

top

 

Joel Davis: I hope everyone enjoyed the show. Like I said, Monday night our time late Monday night I’ll do a one off stream with Thomas777. By the way, update. Tom Sewell he had caught this week on Thursday another pre-trial conference, and it got basically adjourned for another week. Because basically what happened is that the prosecution offered to drop the charges against Tom if he wouldn’t pursue them for legal costs. So they were like we wouldn’t want to pay your lawyer fees for all us dicking you around for the last four months but we’re willing to drop the charge. Meaning like obviously he didn’t do it. And, he was like:

 

“No, you’re going to pay my legal fees, or you can’t like drop the charge, make me pay lawyer fees and then not front up for it.”

 

And so now the prosecution needs another week apparently to figure out whether it wants to pay his legal fees or not so what a joke, the legal process can be! But hopefully that resolves itself soon and we’ll have Tom on the show again soon.

 

81 Jacob Hersant Has Court Re Appealing His Roman Salute Sentence

top

 

Also Jacob Hersant has court this week. I can’t remember which day. Do you remember the dates?

 

[2:35:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: What dates?

 

Joel Davis: Hersant has court next week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you were going to say has “caught something”. Not has like “court”, legal.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no, no! He was sentenced to one month in prison for the Roman salute but then appealed it to the county court. The county court is going to conduct the trial this coming week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: I think it might come on the 10th, but we’ll update you.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, you’ll have to ask him.

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to go down there, at least one of the days, it’s like a three day trial, so I’m probably not going to sit through all three days of the trial. But I’m going to go down there and suss out what’s going on and give Jacob some support. And, we’ll cover it and we’ll report to you what’s happening. So that should be interesting if he wins or not. Obviously it’s a constitutional case as well. So that makes it doubly interesting. It’s challenging the Constitutionality of the act itself.

 

So that’s all happening this week. So there’s going to be some interesting kind of legal wranglings through next week for Tom and Jacob. And we’ll, yeah, probably cover that next week on the show. Plus whatever else is going down. There’s always something interesting. It never stops.

 

Thank God! We continuously make news because there really isn’t that much news in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: You imagine how boring, …

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if we had to log in and talk about how:

 

“Oh, Gerard Rennick was talking shit about Pauline Hanson on Twitter this week. Oh, wow!”

 

Blair Cottrell: How boring would Australian politics be if there was no NSN [National Socialist Network]? There’s been nothing happening! You just have your Sky News shills. I don’t even want to imagine it. I’m thankful for the current political situation, for you guys doing what you do. It makes things very interesting. Keeps pushing boundaries, which I’ve always been sympathetic to that kind of activity. Yeah.

 

Thanks for joining us guys. It’s been a cosy night. It’s been a good stream. We’ve gone for a little longer than we usually do, and I guess we’ll see you guys next week, right?

 

Is there anything else, Joel, before we finish up?

 

82 On the Physical Characteristics of Some Nationalists

top

 

Joel Davis: No. I see people are arguing in the chat. Megawatts says:

 

“I’m 190 centimetres built built beast. But I don’t seem like it from the face.”

 

But then Skinhead Friend said:

 

“I’m only three metres tall. So it’s like the opposite of an Anglo king you see, on the battlefield, Joel is taller IRL than in lore.”

 

Anyway, it’s kind of humourous, it’s ambiguous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel’s this weird blend between nerd and Chad, I don’t know, he’s like multifaceted, personality. But you get some of those. I’ve always noticed that whenever you get, any sort of character in politics which becomes prominent for whatever reason, they sometimes a blend of several different stereotypes. They never kind of, they’re never one dimensional and there’s something to be said for that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like most, it’s interesting too. Like most nationalists, prominent nationalists are usually pretty tall. Like Keith Woods is like six-five. You’re like six-four. I know Ferryman from Canada is like six-four. Hersant and myself are pretty tall. We’re over six, well over six foot. Tom Sewell’s the only prominent [chuckling] I could think of actually he’s under six foot, but he makes up for it because he could probably bash all of us! So that’s the thing, like you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone thinks Tom’s short.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s just like all these mates are too tall! It’s just kind of not fair really. He’s like normal size.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s one of the things. But he also has like it’s the way he’s built because he’s so compact and like square built, strong shoulders, strong legs and shit! I think because he has the long torso, like if Tom and I sit next to each other, he literally looks taller than me because he’s got like a long torso and he sits upright, he’s got good posture. Whereas I slouch and all my height is in my legs. If I sit down I look shorter than him. So it’s a weird sort of aesthetic thing where, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s not such a good squat because he’s got those squatter’s legs.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’s got like the most perfect squat I’ve ever seen! So I don’t know, everyone’s got their strengths.

 

But yeah, I suppose we’ll see you guys next week. We’ll wrap it up there. I need to go to the bathroom.

 

Joel Davis: White power! Blood and honour! Hail Hitler! It’s all happening.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[2:40:27]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/15/2025 = 43)

johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
the succulent meal guy, recently did an interview and admitted that he was robbing safes. he just got out of prison
0 likes

Report
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
4 days ago
I know a couple Davis’s here in Pennsylvania. Good people
0 likes

Report
MrAnglo
Supporter
5 days ago
Never Compromise and Cuck. That is your Tactic. End of Discussion.
0 likes

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – Tactical N-Word – Jun 6, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/08/joel-davis-tactical-n-word-jun-6-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the tactical use of the N-word as used by NSN members in Melbourne with their Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner drop in front of a major shopping centre where Sudanese had engaged in a machete fight. See Table of Contents for points discussed. – KATANA]
01 Clip of Trump Using the N-Word
02 Trump vs Musk Feud
03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes
04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons
05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!
06 Whites created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism?
07 How Irish are you? Joel and Blair’s ancestry
08 DNA labs selling your data to interested parties
09 History of the name Davis
10 Davises in the US had slaves resulting in niggers having the name!
11 Whites, jews, blacks and the slave trade
12 Instagram and the very positive response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes action
13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response
14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party
15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre
16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants
17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites
(Cont’d)
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 27,900 – Duration: 160 mins]
0 likes

FJB6666
5 days ago
Joel looks like a Sikh pajeet with that black beeny on.
0 likes

Report
cowolf
6 days ago
Speaking about the tactics. (I don’t know if you guys even read the comments here, never seen any response.) Sorry but I think you have to get rid of Hitler connotation (images, symbols, at least modify Roman salute), and this is from the supporter of the White cause, an European here. I haven’t seen any honest analysis of what Hitler actually did wrong. I mean, you have literally unlimited amount of material condemning Hitler and making him the greatest villain of all time (which he wasn’t, probably Stalin was) but it all comes from the Hitler’s enemies, it all comes from the WWII winners. What I want to hear is a reflection on Hitler’s mistakes from the Hitler’s supporters. And that is pretty obvious that you can’t go anywhere if you don’t know what went wrong in the first place and don’t want to repeat the mistakes. I watched the whole 12 hours of ‘Europa The Last Battle’ and while it is quite interesting there’s not a single word on what went wrong and why. For most of the countries of anti-German coalition of WWII Hitler will never be acceptable. You may not care that much but that’d be already the first problem: Whites need to learn how to make allies and how to support each other. So first of all, Hitler was not pro-White, he was only pro-German. That’s why he cannot be a unifying figure for all Whites. Every country Hitler attacked was at the time 100% White and nearly 100% Christian. Basically Germany didn’t kill a single non-white during the whole war, it was all White genocide. And tell me how can you blame everything on Jews then make ally with Soviet Union and bomb, burn and loot Poland? The biggest mistake Hitler did was to attack Poland, then it all went downhill. I am happy to hear any constructive opinions.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
6 days ago
I don’t know if it helps but WW2 was mostly about weakening Europe to then strengthen and later weaken the United States (ending segregation, making racism illegal, mass immigration, etc). Hitler could have kept his country on par with the United States without engaging in any war and could have kept his country purely white (if you consider the brown eye’d people white) but he didn’t. He decided to put it in harm’s way by attacking the entire White world FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. Hitler’s people weren’t on the verge of becoming minorities like they are now.. (THANKS TO HITLER) You’d have to be foolish as hell to think Hitler cared about White people or Germany. You’d also have to be pretty dim to think Hitler didn’t massively assist the Jews with his rhetoric and acts against them. Israel was created not long after WW2. Any criticism of Jews or nonwhites in general is the most perceived evil thing anyone can do now thanks to Hitler. Whereas before, it was nothing but common sense to criticize and to attack one’s enemy. I also don’t think Stalin is as evil as Hitler because Stalin didn’t make White people evil by being racist and losing a war. Good luck in life fellow white.
1 like

Report
johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
optics cuck. stop being a pussy.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
cowolf
3 days ago
I asked specifically for ‘constructive opinions’ so get lost and stop being a low IQ retard.
0 likes

Report
BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Blair was talking about my brown college room mate. White people are stupid suckers handing out freebies to him.
0 likes

Report
predatorstomperrr
6 days ago
I’m an American white man and all my friends watch you while we watch ufc. Love you Joel! Don’t ever stop we cna win
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The parks r inaccessible BC we r all destined to 15 mins Eutopean cities where you will own nothing & be happy. If you leave more than you r allowed you will pay for it.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
When I worked with Redskins the conclusion I came to was they are embarrassed of their past. I saw more racism in nons all my life. Whites are hated BC they ARE superior.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who owns Ayers Rock?
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who misses military style education system? It’s the I’m ok ur ok bs ruining & satanizing society.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Just bought a cemetery plot where my great grandparents/grandparents/mother/sister are buried. All Catholics are buried there but BC the cemetery was turned over to township with woke employees it’s now a free for all like the ppl buried there have been excommunicated or something. My ancestors were the ones who had to hike in 10miles of bush with bags of flour on their backs to create farmland, roads & not mudhuts. Do you guys not know the PCR tests of last 4 yrs was taking everyone’s DNA to assess mRNA jabs while causing brain damage.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The guys I follow are bent on dead weight lifting. I have a bunch of dead weights as friends. Lol Do you want them to lift BC I think it’s not being able to lift it’s about endurance. I was blessed to have the company of big strong guys on a 20km hike to have them barfing their under duress guts out all stressed/burnt out having the priest yelling “Just put one foot in front of the other” trying to avoid airlift out. I was 65 yo & could have redid the hike. Heard yrs later how it took a bunch of younger kids 3 days & 2 camping nites to do it. Lol. And boomers get constant lashings. I guess some yuppy boomers deserve it.
1 like

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
Cottrell’s are also Jewish without being disrespectful to Blair.
0 likes

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
The Normans fought a bigger battle in Durres Albania in 1081 against the Eastern Roman empire so Norman’s decendants are there also.
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states!
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states! WPWW o/ Hail Victory!
0 likes

Report
newgerman
6 days ago
ban nz not machetes…says it all in four words AAAAA+++++++
0 likes

Report
basedrespillzeus22
6 days ago
Great stream lads
0 likes

Report
GhostDogMan
Supporter++
1 week ago
lol. You guys are in Winter!! I just remember you are our Polar opposite brethren!
3 likes

Report
A655321
1 week ago
Blair, you don’t live in a traditional democracy anymore do you… Like my country you in a “Liberal democracy,” which exists to constrain the majority, turning the state into a referee for protected classes and global norms, rather than an instrument of national will. The government could care less if we are all replaced.
4 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Pakenham was a beautiful area back in the Australian days. Ironically, it was a place the youth of old Melbourne would run to for sporting fun on the weekends.
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
I wanna hear from the banner offended as their spleen is ruptured by a multiculturally enriched machete thrust.
1 like

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 week ago
I want to hear the NSN policies on the Covid jew-juice. Materialistic Jew-Pharma is going to ethnically cleanse us all, and a lot of people are angry and activated by the government policies. There is no pushback/accountability.
-1 likes

Report
mrwordsworth
1 week ago
it’s pronounced took
0 likes

Report
1488Brother
1 week ago
Yo four ads is crazy before I can get to a tactical N word.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
It isn’t a damn machete crisis. It is a niggerdom crisis. I need my machetes for clearing brush. I don’t need the negroes/Muslims. They provide no value to anyone.
21 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
1 week ago
Exactly, Blair. Heat is for browns.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL “caught” and “court” are homophones in Australian English. W North American English for clarity.
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Trump/Elon distraction from real issue? – Mass surveillance/ PALANTIR Trump bill measures; https://youtu.be/Fg1JZDIconk?si=BGA8h
-1 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah my Nationalist account on IG was banned, hell also I was private.
1 like

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL about KIN-dness.
-1 likes

Report
BlueNorth88
1 week ago
About censorship also, it can give content creators a kind of glamour. Look how Tommy and others milk it to death when it happens. Also the guys that follow to any smaller platform and remain loyal are true followers.
1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Blacks in London, Detroit and now Melbourne, all with the same result. Almost like race is the problem and Magic Soil is a myth.
11 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Why has Blair got a tea cosy on his head? lol
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Otoya_Yamaguchi_G00k
1 week ago
Australia was invented and built by Europeans for Europeans only. https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/the-white-australia-policy-%28feat.:6
9 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Symbolic Victory – May 30, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/02/joel-davis-symbolic-victory-may-30-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: 1. The show is resuming after a break, with the hosts discussing recent events.
2. Joel Davis mentions no longer having “onerous bail conditions”.
3. They discuss weightlifting and an upcoming competition.
4. Joel aims for a 220kg deadlift: “That’s my ideal. If I can hit 220 at nationals, I’ll be ecstatic!”
5. They discuss the challenges of heavy lifting and potential injuries.
6. They talk about a recent court appearance in Adelaide.
7. Joel describes interactions with journalists: “And these journalists, they’re all women. Sometimes in Melbourne, you get these really, like, soy, Lefty, ugly journalists.”
8. They discuss how charges against them are being dropped.
9. Joel criticises the police: “The South Australia Police are a bunch of scumbags!”
10. They discuss African gang violence in Australia.
11. Joel says: “Basically the only thing holding together our society right now is White guys who train because police don’t actually do anything at this point.”
12. They discuss the concept of “Anarcho Tyranny”.
13. Joel talks about attending an event at New South Wales Parliament.
14. They discuss the concept of Universal vs. Particular in philosophy and politics.
15. Joel says: “Until we can go back and say what the Nazi, like the kind of so-called “Nazi” coded what they asserted, that a particular nation can just be itself and assert itself on its own terms.”
16. They discuss the importance of asserting White Identity.
17. Joel criticises the Right-wing for constantly “cucking” to the morality of their enemies. (Cont’d)
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript