Joel Davis: No Blair tonight. It is the 3rd of October 2024. Blair’s got some things that came up. He couldn’t do the show. Blair and I might do a stream, though, maybe Sunday night or something to make up for that, but nevertheless, gotta have a show for you guys this evening, and you got a show with Tom and I, so should be good. There’s a lot to discuss. It’s been an interesting week in global politics, at least, you know, things to Israel, European politics, etcetera. Yes, some interesting things I wanted to discuss.

 

So there’s a lot on the agenda.

 

First of all, I guess, like a place to start would be, we could talk about, obviously, things have kicked off where Israel about a week ago, they did a pretty extensive bombing campaign in Lebanon. They managed to take out the leadership of Hezbollah with that bombing campaign.

 

And then they did a, I don’t know if you would call it an invasion, but they went over the border into Lebanon and they’re doing, their military is active fighting Hezbollah within Lebanon as we speak.

 

And obviously what made a lot of news was the fact that Iran sent over a shitload of ballistic missiles into Israel. They blew up a few, I think, air bases and some other things inside Israel, Israeli air defenses, which are state of the art, thanks to American taxpayers, weren’t able to intercept, because they Iran has hypersonics. I think that they got them from the Russians or something that are pretty, like high tech.

 

So the situation is pretty heavy. Shit has kind of escalated from just what it was for the past year, where it was just a kind of war in Gaza against Hamas. Now it’s going to the next level. And this really shouldn’t be something that we’re that concerned with, but it is something that we should be concerned with purely for the reason that there is a sequence where this keeps escalating to the point that you get an American intervention, and if there’s an American intervention, that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran. Or maybe they deployed troops to fight Hezbollah, maybe war kicks off in Syria, and that could also rope in Australians as well. We’d probably send troops if something like that happened. And that is quite concerning.

 

Obviously, we don’t want to expend any White blood for fucking jews, particularly after the shit show that was Iraq. We don’t want a repeat of that. And I think this time around it would probably be more brutal.

 

So that’s on the horizon. I’m not predicting a war. I think it’s a low percentage chance, but it’s nevertheless a possibility. And I think what’s also interesting about this is the way that there’s a reaction within the domestic politics of Western countries. Like, let’s bring it back to Australia. We’ve seen a lot of the Zionist conservative element be very forceful. There were protests in Sydney. People were waving Hezbollah flags. And some Arab chick was charged with terrorism offences for waving a Hezbollah flag. It’s illegal in Australia to support a listed terrorist organisation. I think they can actually use maybe the same legislation or similar legislation to what they’ve used to ban NSDAP symbols to go after them specifically for the Hezbollah symbols. I’m not so sure about that. Might be different legislation, but anyway, it’s relevant.

 

The point is its pretty testy. Peter Dutton has been out and very forceful in defense of jews, in defense of Israel, holding the Left’s feet to the fire on the issue. And we’ve seen a lot of Zionists that align themselves with the political Right in this country, basically coming out demanding that the Muslims are deported. Not all Muslims, necessarily, but any Muslims that participate in any of these anti-Israel protests.

 

And so that’s quite interesting to kind of break down and analyze. And even, like, Drew Pavlou, who apparently was on the left, and when I debated him, he’s like a wholesome chungus, you know, multiracialist now. He’s almost, like, sounding like hard Right. Because that’s how much he shills for Israel.

 

So it’s kind of interesting to dissect the hypocrisy of that, I think, and analyze it where it’s incredible how the conservative movement can organise so staunchly in defense of jewish interests and the jews.

 

But, you know, crickets when it comes to White Australians, actual Australians. And what concerns us and what the fuck does Israel have to do with Australia? Like, seriously, like, it obviously has nothing to do with Australia. It’s just jewish capture, jewish elite capture of our political institutions.

 

So what do you think about this, Tom? I see you made some comments on Twitter, but how do you kind of take in the whole situation?

 

[05:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, a lot has happened. A lot has happened, but nothing has really impacted our lives at this stage. I did notice that in the US there has been a hurricane, or a flood of some sort that’s damaged a lot of people, and that’s been all over my timeline. And something that I think should be said is its so obvious. Well, I’ll give a bit more information. The National Guard is being deployed to the Middle East at the moment. And the National Guard is meant to be a line of defense for what we did when I was in the army, neo-SAS operations like non-combative evacuation operations, security and stability operations. It’s not really meant to be deployed to war zones. It’s more for like, domestic affairs. And this is the one time where it should be really, a lot of resources should be going into helping these people. But they’re sending billions to Israel for missiles. And their readiness level for their soldiers is not to help their own families but to go overseas. And I saw some screenshots from text messages from people saying, like, active service people in the US saying that they:

 

“Couldn’t go home, they couldn’t get leave to help their families or help their neighbourhoods because they’ve got to be on standby to get the Middle East because of what’s happening.”

 

So this is some collapse of Rome stuff. And I’m not saying that this is what is about to happen. I’m just saying that this general attitude that the US government has towards its people and all governments, all White governments or traitor governmentss have towards White people, they’re teetering on the edge of mutinies, mass mutinies! I’m not saying it’s going to be a mutiny overnight, but this behaviour leads to mutinies. You have to let people, soldiers and civic minded people, you have to let them clean up their homes first before they can go overseas and fight.

 

And yeah, there’s just a general zeitgeist, I think, for Whites globally, that’s very different to when the first Iraq war happened. The zeitgeist back then was quite anti-islamic from just a pure, visceral, you know, guttural dislike for Muslims. I still think that that dislike still exists. And it’s potentially even stronger because of the way Muslims have treated White people over the last, 20 years in our own countries because of the mass migration. I think that feeling still exists. But what it’s not paired with which it was definitely even as a weaker feeling, paired with a stronger sense of going over there and kicking some arse.

 

So when 9/11* happened [an Israeli false flag – Kat] and the 7/7 bombings in the UK and these terrorist attacks in the early 2010s, there was a huge civic patriot, anti-Islam movement to go overseas and kill hajis. And it was as explicit as that. I was in the army and probably 90% of the guys I was in the army with, that was their main reason for joining. It was they want to go to Afghanistan or Iraq and kill Muslims, like, for what they’ve done to the basically to Western civilisation. They weren’t really there to just like, get a meal ticket. That there was like, a racial, a subconscious racial mindedness to do it. I don’t think that exists anymore to. At the same capacity. It still exists, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near as strong as it once was, because there’s so many factors. I won’t even go into it. But it was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles. That was awesome to see.

 

 

[* See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

And I think a lot of people get caught up not saying that you’ve done this, Joel. I think you introduced the topic very well, but I have seen a lot of discourse online where people are saying that:

 

“Everything’s a psyop, nothing ever happens. Israel let themselves get bombed!”

 

And this was probably discussed on an earlier show. It’s like, that’s the wrong attitude. Why do we always have these people acting as if Israel and the jews are some omnipotent force? Yes, they’re very powerful! Yes, they have a completely disproportionate amount of power. Yes, they own the US government, they own the Senate, they own Congress, like, through AIPAC and the Federal Reserve and the media. But sometimes they actually can take a punch, you know what I mean? Sometimes a missile gets through and actually hits something and people saying oh, like there’s a lot of black pill. Whenever something happens, I don’t want to get too excited, obviously, because Israel’s been bombed a lot of times.

 

But, you know, Iran stepping up, when I saw it in my newsfeed, when it said that Iran is basically declaring a state of war and they sent those missiles, I thought to myself:

 

“Wow, I can sleep a bit better tonight. At least they’re doing something. [chuckling] That’s great!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When I would say, though. So followed it kind of closely, and I think Iran didn’t declare war on Israel directly. They bombed them. Yes. And you’re correct that the jews didn’t let the bomb get through. That was jewish cope. They actually blocked out on Google Maps or whatever the satellite footage, like the Israeli bases that got bombed so that you couldn’t see the damage from the satellite imaging. So why cover it up? And they said initially:

 

“Oh, everything’s fine. No one died and everything’s fine. They just killed one Palestinian. Ha ha, idiots!”

 

But then now the truth is coming out. And no, actually the missiles did do some damage. But at the same time, I mean just from a geographical standpoint, like Iran, it’s very difficult for them to do much to Israel because just for geographical distance, like there’s Iraq and Syria between them and Israel.

 

And so it’s a long fucking way! I don’t know if Iran even has carrier ships for their air force, but they wouldn’t be able to use them even if they did because the Americans are sitting there with their much better navy and much better air force kind of as a check on much of what they can do.

 

So, yeah, they can lob some missiles at Israel from a distance and blow up a few things. And that’s good optics for them. And it does restrain Israeli behaviour. And I saw that the French and the British basically said to the Americans and to Israel:

 

“We don’t want you to respond. We’re not going to back you if you respond, you’re on your own.”

 

Kind of thing. They don’t want to see an escalation.

[12:22]

And so I think Iran, they kind of played a strategic hand here. They thought that maybe because Israel is kind of in a precarious situation, it’s tied up, they can lob a few in and maybe get away with it and not get much of a retaliation. But if they were to continue doing it and continue escalating, it would get to a point where the US military would be brought in to then bomb the shit out of Iran in defense of Israel. Like, Israel can wear a few of these and be told by the Americans to wear a few of these. But if they keep escalating, keep escalating, keep escalating, there’s a point at which the jews can pull the strings in ZOG to make America bomb the shit out of Iran. And Iran, I think, is aware of that.

 

So it’s a little bit of an optics game where they want to look like they’re standing up to Israel and they have like, one strategic capacity, which are these long range, like, hypersonic ballistic missiles, but there’s a limited strategic benefit to them.

 

What is interesting, though, is that going into Lebanon, like, there was a lot of hype last week when Israel took out the leaders of Lebanon with their own bombing campaign, which showed that they had really good intelligence because they were able to pinpoint where the leaders were and take them out with aerial bombing. But Hezbollah are, like, 100,000 men, and it’s a guerrilla war.

 

So if they’re going to go into Lebanon, what are they going to do? Occupy all of Lebanon and systematically uncover 100,000 men and execute all of them? That’s totally unrealistic military operation.

 

So they can go in skirmish, try and do some damage to Hezbollah, try and use intelligence to identify where they’re holding some rocket storage facilities or whatever and take them out. But they’re not going to be able to defeat Hezbollah. It’s just not possible. And fighting against the guerrilla enemy with the conventional military is so difficult. Like, the Americans lost in Afghanistan for a reason and in Vietnam for a reason. It’s because, you know, guerrilla technique, when you have the sympathy of the people, creates a disproportionate, like, a massive disproportionate advantage against a conventional occupying force. Conventional force versus conventional force. It’s more of who’s the stronger power will win. But, yeah, with the asymmetric warfare, it’s very, very difficult.

 

And then the longer that this goes on, you have to remember, I had Mike Pinovich on to talk about this because he’s like a spurg about Israel kind of subject. So if you’re interested in his analysis, you can go watch that stream if you haven’t already.

 

But he was making a very accurate point I thought that while all this is going on, Hezbollah are lobbing rockets into Israel. Yeah, like, their rockets aren’t as good as the Israeli rockets or the Iranian rockets, right? But they still blow shit up. They can still kill people. And the jews that live near the Lebanese border, a lot of them, like, have had to evacuate from their homes or if you have businesses in that area that had to shut down.

 

And so there’s millions of jews that are their whole life is on hold while, like, shit is just getting randomly blown up all around them every night. And there’s, like bomb sirens going off all the time, and they’re living in fear. They don’t have a normal life, like a massive portion of the country.

 

And so, like, Israel has a limited window and under which it can conduct this operation. They can’t just go into Lebanon and fight a guerrilla war against Hezbollah for four years, because that means four years of random jews getting their houses blown up in Israel. And that’s just not tolerable. So like, what can Israel realistically do here? Like, they can go in, they can kill some people. A few of them will die. And also, Israel doesn’t have a massive military with a lot of forces. It’s a small country, like in population size.

 

So their high level, like special operations and, like the high quality, high grade fighters, they don’t have a lot. So their strategy has to be either dragging the Americans in, which is going to be difficult, because I think Iran will basically try to push as hard as they can without crossing a line that would drag the Americans in mixed, or basically they can go in and then blow some shit up and declare victory and then go back to Israel. And then Netanyahu probably gets voted out the next election, and the Israeli Left takes control and has a more moderate foreign policy. This whole exercise has just destroyed Israel’s international reputation and pissed off all of their enemies.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s huge protesting at the moment in Israel, huge protesting!

 

So they are in a difficult situation as to how they can escalate this war without escalating, as you said, there’s a huge percentage of, they’re living in what would feel like a war zone, or a prison. And because it is, and they’re locked in. Now, even though they’re not being directly invaded, they’re the difference between the Lebanese or the Palestinians or the Gazans and the jews is the jews are accustomed to a high standard of living, whereas the southern Lebanese, the Gazans and the Palestinians are accustomed to suffering. So they can tolerate a lot of stress and it only strengthens their resolve, whereas the jews actually can’t tolerate that much stress.

 

[17:50]

 

So it’s an effective strategy what Hezbollah and Iran are doing by just keeping them under constant stress without provoking America. That would really be their goal, because obviously provoking America is going to result in the B2 bombers coming over, the Stealth bombers coming over and just bombing Tehran, which is everything that all the power grid’s going to go out. Like, they’re going to try to send Iran back to the Stone Age, which is what all the Hawks in Washington are trying to go for.

 

But there’s obviously two factors at play. There’s the Israeli election and there’s the American election, and I think everything is really in this kind of, it’s not a stalemate, but everything’s in this kind of play on. They’re doing this kind of rigmarole. They’re playing war on the Lebanese border. Like I saw the footage today from the Special Forces soldiers going in. It looks like they wanted to get some. It’s not, as you said, it’s not a full ground invasion. They’re just looking to get in, probe, you know, they’re looking in to get some. And, yeah, they’re not going to get very far with that.

 

Regarding taking out the entire or the vast majority of the Hezbollah leadership. Obviously, the jews have good intel, and they would be leaning entirely, I think, on the Americans. I think the American intel, you know, would be the superior intel. The jews obviously, would have the backdoor to a lot of the Google, and a lot of the kind of modern tech.

 

But I think it’s the American spy network. The Americans just have so many spies on the payroll, and it would just be subcontracted out to. Well, Israel would be subcontracting their workout without paying, obviously. You know, the Americans do it for free.

 

So yeah. I also think it’s interesting that the media or the ABC [state run Australian Broadcasting Corporation], it sounded like they’re trying to defend Hezbollah. It shows you how Left-wing the ABC is when Peter Dutton* was speaking about that girl charged with waving the Hezbollah flag.

 

[* Peter Craig Dutton (born 18 November 1970) is an Australian politician and former police detective serving as the current Leader of the Opposition, holding office as the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia since May 2022. He has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the division of Dickson since 2001. Dutton previously served as the minister for Defence from 2021 to 2022 and the minister for Home Affairs from 2017 to 2021. He held various ministerial positions from 2004 to 2022 in the governments of Howard, Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison. Dutton grew up in Brisbane. He worked as a police officer in the Queensland Police for nearly a decade upon leaving school, and later ran a construction business with his father. He joined the Liberal Party as a teenager and was elected to the House of Representatives at the 2001 election, aged 30.]

 

Regarding that legislation, I’m fairly certain that when they made the recent amendment, they took out the ISIS flag, because originally the ISIS flag was on that amendment as a banneed, like as a designated sort of terror symbol. And they took it off, added the swastika and the double-sig runes, specifically the double-sig runes [SS symbol]. But I can’t remember whether they included the Hezbollah flag in that legislation. But I do know in previous legislation, they named, I think, two random, like, I think was like, Atomwaffen and Sonnenkrieg Division, which was like a Finnish Discord chat as, like the two neo-Nazi groups that were designated terror groups. Yeah, Sonnenkrieg Division isn’t real. It’s like, I think it was like a 15 year old on Discord that had a few, like, international people on it, and I think they just shared BT videos on Discord.

 

So anyway, Sonnenkrieg Division, and I think The Base or Atomwaffen got listed and then there was like seven or eight Islamic groups that were listed, and obviously one of them was Hezbollah. So that would be a separate legislation that would imply the symbolism of Hezbollah would also be designated.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Interesting times.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a pretty brazen thing to do, that girl.

 

I don’t know if you can get that up. Was a Noticer article?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I could probably get it up. I’ll pull it up in a sec.

 

But you know, on the subject I also want to make this take, and I said it actually on social media, but there’s a lot of jews that are coming out now, and we saw this actually, this is a repeat of what we’ve already seen a few times over the past year since shit kicked off between Israel and Hamas last October, where the jews are coming out and calling for deportations. And then that’s just immediately turning on all the conservatives, like:

 

“Yes, yes! Deportations! Oh, my God, let’s get these browns out!”

 

Because, it’s like they’re getting a licence to express their inner racism. But the jews have been saying this for a year, and the jews have a lot of political power in this country. If they really wanted a deportation plan to be seriously implemented, they’re like think tanks and NGO’s and so on would push them very heavily in a systematic way. But we haven’t seen any of that.

 

I feel like a lot of the leading jews, like, I’m sure like a lot of jews just like Zionist sympathizers want these people deported. I don’t doubt that.

 

But I think a lot of the leading jews realise that having these pro-Hamas, pro-Hezbollah, pro-Palestine browns protesting on the streets is actually a great look for them and helps get the sympathy of conservatives on their side because they can play into White racism and they can say:

 

“Hey, look at these fucking browns! They shouldn’t be in our country. They don’t share our values!”

 

And then immediately, I can feel it. You’re like:

 

“Yeah, let’s get these browns out!”

 

And I agree with deporting them, of course, because they’re brown. But I also want the jews deported. I mean, when they say that their terrorist sympathizers. Well, when has Hezbollah committed a terrorist attack against Australia or any terrorist attack against the British Empire, against us? I don’t think that’s ever happened. Someone can quote, if I’m wrong, let me know.

 

But I don’t think that’s ever happened. Israel has committed terrorist attacks against us [yeah 9/11 for example – Kat]. In fact, that’s how the state of Israel came into fucking existence in the first place, through terrorist attacks. And that is land that was won, by the way, by Australian blood. We went in World War One and we fought the Ottoman Empire, and Churchill fucked us over and sent us into the beaches of Gallipoli. And how many men did we lose in that complete fuck up by Churchill in World War One?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think about 8,000.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we fought basically for that land. That was like our land as the British Empire.

 

And then the jews committed terrorism against us and stole it!

 

[24:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: King David Hotel.* They killed like a dozen or more.

 

[* The British administrative headquarters for Mandatory Palestine, housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, were bombed in a terrorist attack on 22 July 1946, by the militant Right-wing Zionist underground organisation Irgun during the Jewish insurgency. Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed, including Arabs, Britons and Jews, and 46 were injured. Wikipedia]

 

 

[See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

Joel Davis: In multiple acts.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah, there was a lot. Well, I think the first. Was it Perez? Was he the first president or prime minister? I think Perez or one of the first. They’ve all got strange jewy names, but one of the first prime ministers or the first prime minister was actually the head of one of the terrorist wings.

 

So it’s the same situation as, like, Nelson Mandela being the head of the ANC terror wing.

 

Joel Davis: There’s some idiot in the chat here. He said:

 

“You didn’t fight for Israeli land, you muppets.”

 

Yeah, in World War One we fought the Ottoman Empire and the Ottoman Empire controlled what is, like Palestine. And then Palestine became under the control of the British Empire.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Syria, I think, became part of Syria, and Lebanon, I think, became part of France. Like, the French controlled that part and the British got Palestine.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s just the history of it.

 

Thomas Sewell: There was a transfer agreement. The British Zionists made a deal to transfer all the European jews, or not all of them, but the vast majority of European jews in 1933 into British Palestine. Which Hitler even supported.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Havara agreement. I mean, that made sense. Like, it was a way to get the jews out of Germany. You know, I would gladly deport all of our jews to Israel tomorrow if we could.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, like, anyway, the point is that supporting Israel is actually supporting an entity that came into being through terrorism, against us. So is it rich when the jews are trying to morally grandstand about terrorism? It’s like:

 

“Okay, so you care about terrorism when it’s against you, even though you committed it against us historically!”

 

And also the only reason that these fucking browns are even here in the fucking first place is because you conspired to destroy the White Australia Policy! Like, jews, like, jewish groups infiltrated the Australian government and systematically attacked the White Australia Policy from the fifties to the seventies and were instrumental in its deconstruction because they felt that they basically were the odd man out in Australia.

 

We didn’t even want them here! There was barely any jews here before World War Two, they then snuck in against our will, largely through, you know, larping as Greeks and Italians. And there were a bunch of American based, like, jewish organisations that funded and facilitated jewish migration to Australia. The jewish diaspora sets up shop here. Immediately, all the communist jews, like, infiltrate our government and start sending all of our state secrets to the Soviet Union.

 

So then we had to create ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] because we had a high trust Anglo society before that. We didn’t even need ASIO. And then leading jewish community groups were like:

 

“Well, we should try and turn this into a multicultural country, open up the borders, end the White Australia Policy, because everyone else in this country are White Christians and we’re jews! And so if we don’t, like, crowd them out with some other minorities, you know what’s going to stop them turning around and looking at us as the odd man out and wanting us out on at some particular point in the future?”

 

And they explicitly said this, more or less like, I’m paraphrasing. So it’s pretty rich when getting lectured by the jews on all this shit!

 

But anyway, like, I digress. I think when you get these calls from a lot of these jewish leaders, it’s a little bit of a bait and switch. They kind of throw the carrot out of kosher racism. And it’s a way to get conservatives to emotionally side with Israel and the only democracy in the Middle East and kind of view jews as White. Like, I saw this clip of Barry Weiss. I think she was doing a podcast with Douglas Murray or something that Keith Woods posted it, like, a couple hours ago on Twitter. Maybe it was only an hour ago, actually, because I just saw it before we went live. And she was sitting down and they were talking about, she’s an American Zionist, by the way, a high, high ranking Zionist jew in the United States. And she was talking about how, like:

 

“Oh, the Qataris have infiltrated America. They’ve infiltrated our sports teams, our education system, our media, and they’re subverting American society!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“You did that! Like, worst. Like, you literally took over the whole fucking country!”

 

But so, like, jews are now just going to pretend like they’re White because it’s suiting them to make Whites identify with Israel.

 

But then when it comes to White issues that directly face us or we talk about, well, rather than deporting people from our country because they upset jews, what about because they upset Whites? Well, then jews freak out!:

 

“That’s literally Hitler! You’re going to commit a “Holocaust”. How dare you? As a jew, White people can’t be allowed to think like that.”

 

So then they magically are not White. So they’re like Schrodinger’s White Guy*, they just flip-flop based upon how it suits them. They’re just subversive scum.

 

[* In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger’s cat is a thought experiment concerning quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment viewed this way is described as a paradox. Wikipedia.]

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

[29:34]

 

Joel Davis: You know, just today, like, Australia’s richest jew, Triguboff came out and we need more immigration, apparently. Apparently like the ridiculously high record historical immigration into Australia that’s caused a housing crisis, and he’s jacking up the crime rate and ruining Australian society. It’s not enough immigrants for him. He wants even more! And who’s going to win? Because we’ve got 74% of the country in a recent poll saying they oppose immigration, we’ve got one richest jew in Australia that supports it. Which way do you think the government’s going to go? Because apparently we live in a democracy. I think the government’s probably going to go with the rich jew!

 

So what does that say?

 

 

[See: https://www.noticer.news/harry-triguboff-demands-immigration-increase/]

Thomas Sewell: He’s been doing that forever, though. He’s made all his billions of mass immigration.

 

So they’re not exactly unbiased sources of public discourse, are they? They’re profiting from it. I mean, you obviously know that, but it’s important for the public to be aware that everyone that advocates for it is either a traitor or they’re profiting from it, or both.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, he’s like Australia’s wealthiest property developer, so of course he wants mass immigration, not just is it crowding out the White demographic but, it’s kind of inflating the housing market. So when he creates these big high rise apartments everywhere, there’s all these jeets to pack into them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, he was complaining last year about how many of them were empty and how he needed to raise immigration. So they just build them. They build them and no one’s even in them yet. They’re not even 50% sold, but they just keep building.

 

And then they build the next one, and they haven’t even sold off the first one yet and they just keep building. And he went and lobbied the government and I don’t remember the exact conversation and obviously I wasn’t there and it wasn’t documented. But the article that I read that discussed the conversation that he had with the government when he spoke to them was:

 

“Who’s going to buy these apartments? I built them all and now they’re just sitting empty. Who’s going to buy these apartments, you need to raise the immigration level.”

 

So it’s absolutely disgusting!

 

Joel Davis: He’s one of the biggest campaign contributors to the Liberal Party and the Labor Party, by the way. And yeah, he’s been advocating for big Australia immigration policy for decades in a very prominent way with the property lobby and other lobby groups, pro-immigration lobby groups. So, yeah, that’s how it works.

 

But this is a bit of a digression, but I think it’s an important digression because when we’re talking about the Israel issue, like Blair said last week, it was kind of provocative. I think Blair said words to the effect of:

 

“I don’t care if Israel go in and genocide a million Palestinians tomorrow, and I don’t give a shit if Hamas invades Israel and gas a million jews tomorrow, it’s not my fucking problem!”

 

And I agree with that sentiment. It isn’t our fucking problem! But it’s made our problem because of the fact that they’re here in our fucking country!

 

So now we have to deal with it on the basis of what’s in, and also that the jews are trying to drag us into it as well and fight their wars for them. So that’s what makes it our problem.

 

And so I think there’s a pro-White perspective here. It’s like, I don’t really give a shit about. I don’t want to have to give a shit about it, but I’m forced to because of their presence here, their parasitism, their subversion of my society. And that’s where I differentiate from., … There’s certain elements in the movement that have this view:

 

“That we should really focus upon the plight of the poor Palestinians and waving Iranian flags and supporting the struggle of browns against Israel because they will pull on the heartstrings of Whites. They like an underdog, and they’ll come around and support the enemies of Israel, and it will help them to see the problem with zionism and with jews.”

 

And I just fundamentally disagree with that approach. I think that’s already basically the mainstream position of the Left. And all of them see Israel as a kind of evil, kind of they almost see it as White and as, like a Western settler colonial project, much like Australia. And they hate it for the same reasons that they hate Australia or they hate America, insofar as it’s, like, a White dominated country.

 

So I don’t believe in that kind of universalistic, like, moralism. I think we should just simply assert the fact that as Whites, we want our money, our blood and treasure to be entirely focused upon defending our own fucking people and our own interests and to hell with everybody else! And that’s basically how everyone in the world thinks, except, you know, Whites that have been psyopped into this deranged humanitarianism.

 

And I think the average Australian, like, you can look at opinion polls, do you support Israel? Do you support Palestine? I think the average Australian really doesn’t give a fuck either way. I think only a very small fraction of society really cares either way. And that’s actually natural and healthy because it’s on the other side of the fucking world, and these people have nothing to do with us! Why would they care? Like, if something was happening to a European country, like, if something was happening to Britain or to Germany or to the United States, then, yeah, of course we would care because they’re like racial kin. Who the fuck cares about, … I laugh at the jews getting blown up by Iranian bombs, but I don’t really care about what’s going on there personally.

 

I think the messaging has to be, how does it affect Australians? How does it affect Whites in general? You said before the stream that you didn’t see because Keith Woods debated. I can’t, but this guy’s name. His name was Daniel. It’s like some Muslim guy who lives in America, Daniel, some fucking, like, gibberish, right? He’s got some gibberish, fucking, you know, brown, like, Arabic name or something. I don’t know exactly where he’s from. But they were debating White nationalism, and the debate was interesting because Keith Woods was going for this kind of wholesome chungus White nationalism, where he was like:

 

“Hey, look I think we should have White countries for people of European descent, because those are our native lands, and I don’t want our countries to be involved in Middle Eastern politics or imposing ourselves over the Muslim world either. So we’re happy to leave you alone if you leave us alone. So what’s wrong with that?”

 

And what Daniel the Muslim, responded to that with, which I thought was really interesting, was he said:

 

“But if we let Whites have their own countries, what’s going to stop you creating all this super advanced technology, AI, robotics and so on, and then imposing., …”

 

And he literally said:

 

“Whites have higher IQs and they’re better at creating technologies. And what’s going to stop you from creating this satanic technological mega empire that then completely fucks us up. Whereas if we stuff ourselves into your countries now, we can stop you from developing basically, and prevent this kind of like, Faustian runaway where the Whiteman re-ascends to global domination status.”

 

[36:55]

 

And I’ve never heard a brown person ever make that argument before, but it was actually really interesting that he did.

 

And it’s like, I can actually see his point. That actually is a rational position for a brown person to take. I’m sure that’s actually implicit in how a lot of non-Whites think about this. Where the reason why they are so indifferent to our plight, it’s not just because they’re just selfish and only care about their own group. I think it’s because they’re afraid of us. They’re afraid, like right now, the Whiteman is weak and they can smell blood. And it’s like:

 

“We got to take these motherfuckers out now while they’re having their retard moment. Because if they wake up to themselves and go full Hitler mode, we’re fucked! Like, they’re just going to Giga Chad their way over the world again and we’re going to be their bitch!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And they’re not wrong. And Keith Woods can come along and give, like, his wholesome chungus:

 

“No, no, no! We’re nice guys. White people are nice. We just want to have our homelands back. And we respect you if you respect us.”

 

And I can see why the browns aren’t buying it because it actually does kind of smell like bullshit! And the reality is, for every Keith Woods, there’s a Joel Davis or Thomas Sowell or whatever, that if we look, yeah, we are coming for all your shit! If we get back in power, like, of course we are, because someone’s got to run the world. And if we don’t do it, the Chinese are going to do it, or some other group is going to do it. And so the only guarantee against someone else taking over the fucking world is taking it over yourself!

 

So there’s a zero sum kind of reality.

 

And actually Nick Fuentes, like, kind of criticised Keith on this point on his show, and I agreed with his take because he was saying, like:

 

“So what are we going to do? Like, we’re going to take back all of the White countries, and then there’s all of these vital resources, natural resources in Africa, and we kind of need them to advance our civilisation. And we’re going to go to the African tribesmen and be like: ‘Hey, can we have some of your minerals?”

 

 

And then, you know, chief, like I don’t know, some gibberish African name is like:

 

“No, you can’t have it!”

 

And they’ve got like a bunch of sticks and rocks and we’ve got like nuclear weapons and like all this advanced tech, and we’re just going to be like:

 

“Okay, you’re right to self-determination. You can keep all the vital minerals, like lithium ion and all this shit that you’ve got that we kind of need, and we’ll just like, stagnate our civilisation and just not come take it.”

 

And it’s like, that’s obviously pretty unrealistic. That’s just not how any civilisation has operated ever in world history. And the argument, I want to get your take on this because the argument from Keith Woods, I haven’t spoken to him about this directly this week, but I’ve spoken to him about this a lot over the years because we’re old friends. And his argument is that, well, the thing is he’d be like:

 

“Okay, I can see what you’re saying. But the thing is that if we put ourselves about in that kind of realistic supremacist way, we’re going to freak out all the other White people. And then White people aren’t going to want to do White nationalism because they’re going to get freaked out by this, like unoptical supremacism that makes it seem like Whites organising politically really is what the jewish media caricatures it as. It really is this genocidal, immoral, you know, evil, maniacal force in the world. And maybe the jews are right. Maybe the White race does need to be, … Maybe Daniel is right. Maybe the Muslims have to come and replace us to make sure that we don’t create some kind of dystopian, like, techno futurism that enslaves the world or something.”

 

But my retort to that is that I don’t think that Whites who are too morally cucked to embrace supremacy will have what it takes to take our countries back. I think the only Whites that will be capable of having the grit to rise up, take back control, do what needs to be done to assert ourselves back over our countries, which is going to require a hard struggle. And we’re going to have to basically ruin the lives of all the non-Whites that live in our countries to send them back. And some of them might want to fight us, as. Well, that’s going to require a kind of stomach for doing that. Kind of the assertion that:

 

“No, we are going to put our people first, and we don’t really care if that ruins your life. We don’t really care if people have to get hurt. We’re gonna do it!”

 

And I think really only, like, for someone to have that attitude, they have to kind of leave the humanitarian, you know, chungus, equitable. Like, let’s sit down in a room in suits and work this out like civilised individuals. Like, I don’t think that’s realistic. I don’t think we’re going to sit down and negotiate our way out of this. I’m going to have to fight our way out of this, and we’re going to have to impose ourselves in a very forceful way.

 

And the people that impose themselves are ultimately going to be supremacists. And Whites aren’t, like, innately incapable of having a supremacist worldview because we literally used to! We literally did White supremacy already and ran the whole fucking world! We had colonial empires that spanned the entire globe. We almost conquered the whole fucking thing! Like, 100 years ago. We literally ran everything in the entire world except Japan and China, and that was about it. We ran everything else.

 

So, yeah, like, it’s not like Whites are inherently cucked and unable to embrace this worldview. But I think we have to overcome the source, that spiritual source of that cuckoldry to win! And all else is folly!

 

But how do you see it?

 

[42:22]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Keith is playing that optical game, and maybe he does genuinely believe that. And that is certainly a much stronger position than the people that are currently in power or that currently are ruling over White people.

 

So that’s fine and noble. But, just because you remove your claws doesn’t make you a good person. Ultimately, White people need to have their claws back. And I kind of had a strange discourse today, just responding to another Telegram page, a big Telegram page that was talking about how cruelty was a bad thing or an evil thing, that was just completely off the mark, which we don’t need to go into. But you did mention cruelty in your little segment, and you mentioned re-migration, and you mentioned taking resources.

 

And so in this thought experiment, we’ve got this idea of we’re going to need resources. Let’s say we end our finite supply and Africa is there for the taking, and it’s more or less gone back to the Stone Age. What process do we initiate in order to get the resources? Well, the way I understand White people to be is that we’re very polite. White people innately are very polite. And we would probably try to get what we want through peace before just going straight to war. I don’t think White people are innately barbaric, that are just like, yep, let’s just smash everyone and everything in our way. We generally look for a path of least resistance. The jews often do the same thing, but then when they don’t get what they want, they usually look towards subversion.

 

And so when you have kind of Anglo and jewish influences within a federal government like the United States or Great Britain, you have all these kind of different foreign policies in order to obtain the resources that you want.

 

So the English, obviously, with some heavy influence from the East India Company and some jews in the banking sector established gun boat diplomacy, for example, and gunboat diplomacy expanded massively through the American empire post World War Two. And it goes under many different names.

 

There’s many books written about it. But more or less, it’s like how to conquer nations through debt slavery, through embargoes, through pressuring them and these stages of escalation until they fucking, you know, funding coups to take out, you know, Saddam or take out Gaddafi or whoever it is or Bashar Al-Assad. So we can see that that is an innate kind of hybrid policy versus the kind of Faustian or Aryan spirit with German National Socialism where Hitler’s like:

 

“All right, Germany needs living space. We’re going to push the Slavs, like, further into Eastern Europe or further past the Volga into the Caucasus, and Germany is going to expand down these river systems where all these German colonies exist already in Eastern Europe. And we’re just going to bridge these gaps so that we’ve got more land and we’re just going to fucking do it!”

 

So obviously, there’s this kind of just outward force, and then there’s kind of more calculated, maybe a little bit more Machiavellian, maybe a bit more subversive forces in order to get what we want.

 

But ultimately, when we, as you said, when we unshackle ourselves from this spiritual virus, which centres around White guilt and this guilty consciousness for what’s happened in the past, when that’s gone, when that’s no longer, you know, containing our will, we’re going to see White colonialism on a whole new level.

 

Now regarding re-migration, because that’s actually more important than taking resources in Africa because, yeah, like, whenever I get asked questions like that:

 

“Are we going to do this? Are we going to do that?”

 

Yeah, sure. Like let’s clean up the house first. And when the house is clean, we can focus on the street.

 

[46:32]

 

So it’s like, let’s deal with the immediate issue, which is obviously jewish control of our nation, and the traitors, the traitors that are in control of our nation. When we deal with that, I think the vast majority of non-Whites are going to leave Australia. Once White people rise up and we take back our government and we kick out and deal with all the traitors and all the jews, and either go to Israel or whatever. That’s a good point in itself because people always FED post with that. But I had my, like the 10th or 11th bank account shut down recently.

 

And I remember the first time I had my bank account shut down. My politics was very, very, I wasn’t very fanatical. I don’t know how to express it. I had the same essence of what I have now, but it was nowhere near as strong, it was nowhere near as radical. It wasn’t fanatical. I wasn’t obsessed the way I am now. I wasn’t a seeking justice, I wasn’t personally hurt, I wasn’t personally aggrieved. I wasn’t motivated by a sense of deep, deep pressure! There wasn’t a deep pressure to change the problem. It was more just like a holistic:

 

“There’s a wrong, it needs to be corrected. This is a better way of running the country.”

 

It was more rational, less emotional.

 

And then they shut down my first bank account. This goes back to 2015. And I thought to myself:

 

“Whoa, that’s an escalation. I don’t like the symbology of that. Where is this going? Is this how this government behaves? This is how this corporate state behaves? They’re willing to go to that length? They’re willing to eventually take food off my table, so I starve to death, or I can’t provide an income for myself or my future family. Okay, that’s an escalation!”

 

And my politics started radically changing after that point! Because I was personally aggrieved.

 

So what that where I’m going with that, at a tactical, strategic level. Sorry, not tactical, strategic level, is everyone’s going to get exactly what they deserve. So if this is resolved nicely and quickly in the next, say, like, decade, I’m sure there will be these, like very astute, you know, Keith Woods approved policies of how we’re going to do re-migration and how it’s going to be packaged and the optics of it. And it starts with these:

 

“Can you please leave? And here’s the plane ticket.”

 

And then it kind of escalates. It continues escalating.

 

And so what’s happening is the longer this goes on for, the more damage done to White people in the process, the worse, the more cruel, the more horrible, the more violent, aggressive, dominating, exhaustive is the energy and the violence that White people are going to be capable of! It’s not even that I want that or don’t want that, it’s beyond that! It’s like that’s what we’re going to be capable of as a collective the longer this goes on for.

 

So you have re-migration, but we’re not even calling for re-migration. We don’t even use that term. We do a little bit, but the term that we put on our banner was “deportation”. And that’s a whole different kind of conversation. When you talk about re-migration, it’s kind of packaged nicely and softly. We talk about deportation. It’s at bayonet point! It’s a completely different kind of, it’s a more aggressive approach because I think fundamentally our belief is that re-migration is not enough.

 

What re-migration entails is a polite conversation, and asking people to leave and maybe getting rid of some troublemakers, versus deportations implies actually changing the structure of the society completely! Totally! Absolutely! And the team, like Keith Wood’s team, I’m sure he’ll progress, and I’m sure as time goes on, they will sense the further aggrievement of society as a whole, and they will sense the further escalation. Because this ultimately goes back to Israel-Palestine or Israel Lebanon or Israel Iran. It’s the same sort of concept. It’s a type of warfare that is escalating, that’s constantly escalating. So where it is at the moment, re-migration, Keith Woods, friendly optics. Where it is right now at this exact point in time, is probably the most popular thing as we’re seeing with European elections at the moment. Is that going to be the case in ten years time? I don’t think so. and that’s why our optics are built different.

 

So that’s what I think about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, I know Keith pretty well, and I don’t doubt that he is well intentioned. I never question his intentions. I think he’s trying to do what he thinks is the best thing for, not just for the Irish, but for the White race in general. I think he is sincere.

 

But, yeah, for me, because I used to have a little bit more of that strategy in my approach. That was partly due to also trying to make my nationalism and my Catholicism fit together. It was partly because of that as well, or I think largely because of that.

 

But when I look at things objectively in some of these European countries, I can see maybe a cleaner way of preserving their demographics. But when I look at the core countries, which are really where the power is distributed, like the United States, Britain, France, Germany, or here, I don’t think it’s going to be so simple. And those are really the key countries, the key geographical locales that need to be secured.

 

Whereas I think in Hungary and in Austria, they can probably vote their way to maintaining a 95% White country, plus. Hungary basically has that already. The Austrians, very positive signs. I mean, I want to talk a bit about the Austrian election, but I guess this will bridge into it a little bit. But I want to discuss that as a separate topic.

 

[53:05]

 

But, yeah, but for me, I’m kind of looking, like, three steps ahead, and I’m like, okay, I’m already there. And I’m trying to prepare people for the fact that that’s where we’re going. That’s kind of like the inevitable destination. And the sooner that people accept that and prepare accordingly. And by preparing, I don’t mean, I’m not FED posting, I’m not saying:

 

“Stockpile your guns. Race wars are coming!”

 

I’m not saying that. Don’t misconstrue me.

 

What I’m saying is preparing yourself, like, mentally and spiritually for the attitude and the mentality that is going to be necessary at that point.

 

So anyway, yeah, my view on this is that uh, things are going to accelerate into a more, … And what I mean by that as well, White people are at the moment, yes, the majority of White people are afraid of going full where we are, with our position, obviously. But the resistance is weakening. You know, in the last two years, I posted about this today. The discourse even within our movement has become so much more radical and also, generally speaking. Just think about it. Like, across European politics, conservatism is dead. There is not even one country where the conservative Party is getting more votes than the populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party. Except England. Like, except Britain, just. Where, the conservatives are only slightly ahead of the Reform Party. And by the next election, I think Reform could overtake them because the Tories are either going to put some jew in charge who’s going to shill for Israel egregiously, and he might do somewhat better, or the other main candidate seems to be this black woman.

 

So the conservatives, I really hope they put the black woman in charge of the conservatives, [chuckling] because that would be hilarious! They’ll completely die. So conservatism as a political aesthetic is dead in Europe. In the United States we criticise Trump, and the criticisms are valid.

 

But if you look at it objectively, Trump’s campaign this time around is more radical than the last two times. Like, he wasn’t promising mass deportations the first two times. That’s now his signature policy. And that’s actually an intensification. But our movement has progressed so quickly and so radically that we’re further away from Trump. Like, Trump moved, like, 10% or 20% towards us, but then we moved, like, 80% away. So then we’re just like:

 

“What the fuck is this?”

 

Whereas in 2016, there was all of this kind of energy from the Alt-Right, the dissident Right, whatever, for Trump, and people are acting like, as if Trump cucked and he used to be based, but now, it’s literally the same shit! It’s actually a slightly more radical version of what it already was. And that’s something interesting to behold.

 

There’s been this radicalisation, and then even in Australia the response to our organisation you know, people wouldn’t touch. Even, like, twelve months ago, people wouldn’t touch us with a twelve foot pole now. You know, attitudes are softening massively, massively!

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And what I kind of prophesy is that as the situation gets worse, as White people are not just demographically crowded out by all this immigration, like, I just saw, I have to confirm this and look into it, but I saw some posts on Twitter about the New Zealand census, which New Zealand is only 55% White now! Which, like, their census from last year, which is insane! Because I thought it was 80% White. I haven’t been to New Zealand in five years, so it’s a small population, and a lot of the Whites in New Zealand move here.

 

So I don’t know. I have to look into that. I’ll talk about it more on the show next week when I’ve had a chance to check those figures for myself. But I mean, that’s insane! If that’s true, that’s fucking insane! That is such a quick transition. America is almost majority, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Canada’s had the fastest transition. I saw some statistics today that said, I think it said five out of the top six cities. I’d have to find it again. But I think from memory what it said, five of the six cities with the highest percentage of foreign born people were in Canada.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. And the rates of immigration here have been obviously crazy in recent years. Australia is lucky in the sense that we do get a decent amount of White immigration. We get people coming here from Britain and Ireland and stuff, and that helps preserve our demographic to a certain extent.

 

And I actually posted about this again recently that if you look at the voting patterns, like, I really find it annoying when you get these Australian parochialists wherexx they are like:

 

“Oh, like, fuck the Poms!”

 

Like, they have an issue with White immigrants. It’s like White immigrants are a blessing. If you look at the data, European immigrants are way more Right-wing than native born Australians. They’re majority Right-wing voters. They’re more opposed to immigration as well, I’ve seen in certain polls than native born Australians. There’s plenty of people in our organisation, by the way, that weren’t born here and we’re in the situation as a race.

 

So I think that is kind of like really short sighted and narrow minded to take that view. The problem isn’t immigration necessarily. The problem is non-White immigration. Like, White immigration is fine. This country was built off White immigration.

 

[58:42]

 

But, the point though is that the demographics are getting ridiculously destroyed in a super quick way now. Like, the rates are boosting and at the same time the anti-White persecution is boosting. It gets to the point now Muslims are organising to have their own independent power bloc and so on. The racial lines are getting a lot more explicit.

 

There’s a point at which you have such a high degree of racial conflict at the core of your political system that these kind of highfalutin ethical ideals like “justice and rights” and all of this kind of stuff that is like the bedrock of liberal democracy, where these things start to really subside in kind of relevance. And all that people start to care about is just the existential reality of:

 

“My team winning, my team losing, my team being subjugated, my team fighting back against oppression!”

 

Or whatever. And people just start seeing politics in these kind of tribalistic friend-enemy, distinction, us versus them turns, and they start to see the world in a dog-eat-dog way.

 

Like, if you look at the data on Trump supporters, the Trump supporters that live in cities, I saw a poll about this years ago, they have more of, like a dog-eat-dog understanding of the world, and they’re more concerned about immigration. Where the Trump supporters that live in the really White areas, they’re like generic Christian, Evangelical Christian Republicans who are just voting for the Republican Party because that’s what they do. But they aren’t anywhere near as concerned with immigration. And they’re a lot more soft on racial issues, because they live in a White neighbourhood in a nice part of America. So they don’t actually have to deal with the same issues that the city dwelling Whites have to deal with. Where there’s black ghettos around them and beaners are pouring in and they’re getting crowded out in the place where they grew up. There’s lots of places in major cities where they’re just not the same place that they were 10, 20 years ago when you were younger. They’ve been completely transformed.

 

So that is going to incept over time, more of this kind of existential framing on politics, and it’s going to soften people up to hearing what we have to say, which is a very simple message, which is that:

 

“Forget all the noise. Either we come together and fight back and defend the ourselves and our interests against all of these people that are targeting us and that are against us and want to destroy us, or they’ll destroy us!”

 

And all of your ideals about fucking freedom and justice and humanitarianism, like, you can shove that up your ass! Because that is really, like, almost irrelevant at this point. Because none of those principles are being given to us by anyone else. None of these other groups that are, they’re all hypocrites! None of them extend any of these rights or concerns to us. So why the fuck should we care about them? We should reassert ourselves, take back control. And when we have power and control and stability, then we can worry about them again.

 

And that message might seem radical right now, but it’s becoming less and less radical by the day. And people are more and more for it because, and I think in a lot of ways as well, that’s actually the only way to make politics interesting to a lot of Australians. I think a lot of Australians, they’re apolitical because it’s not necessarily because they have no interest potentially, in politics whatsoever! And they’re just totally just apolitical zombies. It’s because politics hasn’t been interesting. If politics is a battle between conservatism and socialism, they don’t really give a fuck!

 

But if politics becomes race war, that’s infinitely more interesting. And if politics goes from being like this kind of gay argument about ideology and it becomes something concrete, which is:

 

“Are we going to have control of this country? Or are we going to just give it away and become subjugated in our own country and just be, like, cucked by this whole process?”

 

That actually is a fight! Like, it’s not about:

 

“Who are you voting for and how much taxes should we pay. It’s like, this is a fucking knife fight for who controls the country!”

 

So I actually have a lot of faith in our politics to become very popular and very engaging to a large group of people in the coming decade. That’s the main difference that I have with, I don’t want to use the word “optics cuck”, because that’s not necessarily accurate. I think, in a lot of cases. But with the very ethically constrained humanitarian version of White nationalism, where I think that that approach, the idea that Whites will only embrace a pro-White position within that purview, and they won’t embrace a kind of more like, realistic dog-eat-dog world existential White nationalism, which is just like:

 

“It’s us or them! Which side are you fucking on?”

 

I just don’t buy that. I don’t think that’s actually true.

 

But I guess I don’t know where Tom went. I guess he’ll be back soon. I wanted to get his take, but I was just kind of finished that point.

 

But while he’s gone, I guess we can talk about the Austrian election. The Austrian election was quite interesting. The Freedom Party of Austria, which is, I think it’s one of the most radical parties in Europe that actually gets votes and is like, a mainstream power player. So their policies are like:

 

“We’re not going to take any asylum seeker, even applications, we’re not even going to take refugee applications. Full stop. Fortress Austria!”

 

They call it “Fortress Austria! Fortress Europe! No immigration!” Like, literally no immigration from outside Europe into Europe is their position. And re-migration plans to start repatriating non-Whites back to wherever they came from.

 

So it’s a very radical set of policies by the standards of European politics.

 

[1:04:42]

 

 

As I said, there’s not really many other parties in Europe that have any kind of support behind them, that have policies that radical. And they just got the most votes of any party. They got like 30% of the vote in the Austrian election and they could make a deal with the conservatives to create a coalition and rule. So right now, the Chancellor of Austria is the leader of the conservatives, who got, like, I think, 25% of the votes.

 

So they’ve got enough seats between them to run the government. And they’re now, I think, going to negotiate, you know, potentially some kind of coalition government. Those negotiations could fail. I watched a few Martin Sellner* interviews, who is the most, like, well known identitarian nationalist activist in Austria. Did a few streams with him back in the day, actually, very intelligent guy, an incredible activist, very successful.

 

[* Martin Michael Sellner (born 8 January 1989) is an Austrian far-Right political activist, and leader of the Identitarian Movement of Austria, which he cofounded in 2012. He is considered to be a key figure in the Neue Rechte in the German-speaking countries. He is also deemed to be part of the alt-right movement. In March 2018, he was denied entry to, and deported from, the United Kingdom. A year later, he was denied entry to the United States because of the Christchurch shooter event. In March 2024, the city of Potsdam tried to ban Sellner from entering Germany for 3 years, because of his speech on “remigration” at the 2023 Potsdam far-Right meeting, that ban was revoked by a German court in late May 2024. Sellner talks about the Great Replacement. In March 2024, Sellner was arrested by Swiss police while he was giving a speech at an event of the Swiss Identitarian organisation. Wikipedia]

 

And I think he’s the individual that is most responsible for the normalisation of the term “re-migration” in the world. So you have to give him a lot of credit for that.

 

And he was saying that obviously, he has a lot of connections and a lot of understanding of Austrian politics. He was saying that he is doubtful that the conservatives will ultimately be willing to form a coalition with the Freedom Party, that they will allow Kickl, who’s the leader of the Freedom Party, to become the Chancellor, and that those negotiations might be unsuccessful and the conservatives might go to the socialists and some of the other Left-wing parties and try and create a coalition there instead. And they’ll have to rule with a slim majority.

 

And maybe this is actually good, because if the conservatives can’t make a deal with the nationalists and instead go and make a deal with the socialists to rule, even though the nationalists are the most popular party in the country, that will look very bad for them. The government that they negotiate out will be obviously even more cucked than the conservative government has been because they’ll have to make all these concessions to the Left. Meanwhile, the Freedom Party will be able to kind of fight both of them as, like one thing as a pure opposition movement.

 

And if you look at the voter demographics, the majority of the conservative votes are coming from Boomers, whereas, like, younger voters, like even like Gen-X, Millennials and Zoomers are way more voting for the Freedom Party than any other party in Austria. So demographics are on, age demography is on their side. They are the ascendant party, like the ones that have been making gains for the last few years.

 

So if they don’t get a coalition sorted I could see them doing even better at the next election and then being at that point too big that they’ll be able to kind of form the government. They’ll be too big to fail at that point, and the conservatives will be so decimated that they can subjugate them basically to their coalition at the next election.

 

So it’ll be interesting to see what happens, like, whether they actually get into government now or not. But what it shows is that a hardcore anti-immigration platform and a pro-re-migration platform can win politically in central Europe.

 

And obviously parties like that, like the AfD in Germany and other parties with similar policies, are doing incredibly well all over Europe.

 

And so it is kind of white pilling to see that European voters, particularly young European voters, basically awakening to their interests and backing the further Right parties. And, yeah, there’s, like so much momentum behind the idea of not just shutting down immigration into Europe from non-Whites, but actually fucking sending them back and kind of just securing Europe for the White race.

 

So I think that’s quite positive. I’m quite white pilled about it. Not that I think that these guys are going to get in and fix everything in the next year or something, but that the trajectory is very good. It’s very good.

 

How do you see it?

 

Thomas Sewell: The quote that comes to mind is Adolf Hitler. He says:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And that applies perfectly to this exact scenario. There’s a lot of Hitler quotes that are taken out of context or used for things that aren’t necessarily relevant. But that quote is relative to the NSDAP struggle, their historical struggle, and they obviously entered in a lot of coalitions. They had a lot of election success in 31 and 32, but not enough success to completely take power. And even right at the end, they had to, well, just before the second last thing, I guess, that they did was they entered into a coalition with the monarchists. That was the last faction left. But there was many, many circumstances where they were doing very well. And in order to have some sort of share of power, they had to make these concessions. And Hitler refused to make the concessions. He said:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And so it’s very good to see this kind of progress. And the politics is just so rapidly changing across Europe. I mean, Martin Sellner and all these freedom parties across Europe, from the Netherlands to Austria to AfD to the Swedish version, all these parties were just microscopic ten years ago, they were just micro parties, kind of like here in Australia, how we’ve just got all these useless micro parties. And they just had a vision of where they wanted to be. Where they wanted to go. They didn’t really keep too many secrets as to where they were going. They played the very optical game, which if you want to have a sort of five or ten year period success, you do that you don’t do what we’re doing, that’s for sure. And they’ve achieved a lot of these parties are either the second or third or now, in the case of the Freedom Party in Austria, they’re the biggest party in the country.

 

[1:10:48]

 

This rolls downhill and this should be very white pilling for everyone, even if this isn’t the be all and end all for Europe or central Europe, obviously, it’s going to be a much more serious party, or a more serious version of the Freedom Party that’s going to be equipped with The Right Stuff to really make the big differences. And that brings me to the point that I discussed before when we brought up Keith Woods. The subject of re-migration is really important because the second half of the statement re-migration is not when, it’s not why, it’s how! And it’s with, what army?

 

So that’s the second half of the question with what army? And why we are doing what we’re doing and why we’re doing it differently to, say AfD or Freedom party or the party in the Netherlands or SD or whatever it’s called in Sweden.

 

The reason why we’re doing what we’re doing is because you can’t use the current state apparatus to achieve the goals that you actually need to in its current form. Where Australia needs to go, where America needs to go, where Britain needs to go, where all of Europe needs to go, where all of us together need to go. We need a state apparatus that can enforce the political party.

 

So we don’t actually have that. What we have is a liberal democratic system where, let’s say, hypothetically, we take power in ten years or 15 or five. The number doesn’t really matter, the timeframe doesn’t matter for the scenario.

 

But then you start these re-migrations, so you turbocharge., … We have Customs here in Australia. We have, like, Customs. We have border security. We have a similar version to what they have in America called ICE*. We have these things here in Australia, and these things are everywhere in America and in Europe. Now, are they very large? Are they large enough? No! Could we turbocharge these things? Could we put more funding into them because now we’ve got power, now we control Parliament, we can put a couple hundred million dollars into these parts of the state apparatus. But this is not something that can be fixed with money, because just like how the government is telling American soldiers that they can’t go help their families, they’ve got to be on standby to go to the Middle East and its bordering on a mutiny.

 

[* U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a federal law enforcement agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. ICE’s stated mission is to protect the United States from cross-border crime and undocumented immigration that threaten national security and public safety. Wikipedia]

 

Likewise, if the State Department is full of people that are fundamentally traitors or they’re not actually supporters of the Freedom Party, or they’re not supporters of the re-migration effort, you’re only ever going to get these kind of piss poor attempts at really attacking the nerve centre of migration. You’re going to have criminals sent back. You’re going to have all the loose hanging fruit is going to be sent back. Anyone that’s kind of just easy to grab is going to be sent back. But there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in Austria, there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in England or Australia and tens of millions of non-Whites in the United States, even with a million or two being deported.

 

So then you’re back at square one. Okay, well, so what do we need to do then? So then either you force the state apparatus through further legislation, you force them to go even further and you’re going to face a mutiny. You’re going to face an ineffective government. And the people in the Freedom Party, the people in the Republican Party, whoever’s going to be in charge of deportations in this first round of deportations, they’re not stupid. Sorry, not in charge of but the people that are going to be soliciting it, they’re not stupid. They know when they’re going to be on the brink of mutiny. They know when the state apparatus is going to say no. They know when the general public are going to strike and protest. And they’re going to have, they’re going to want to do it in a way that escalates the situation but doesn’t escalate enough that you’re going to see mass hysteria in the public. You’re going to see the media kick off, you’re going to see some Lefties complaint and some protests in the city. But you’re not going to see like what happened with the Freedom Convoy and the Freedom Rallies [re Covid] where a quarter of a million people are in the street and the CBD is just at a standstill for days. You’re not going to see that with a small amount of deportations.

 

But with mass deportations, you are going to see that. The state apparatus isn’t able to actually do what it needs to do to clean the country up, to fix the problem. So then we’re back at square one.

 

So it’s not money that you throw at the department or the apparatus. It’s now a change in manpower. It’s a complete change in manpower. Now, the entryists or the reformers, the Fuentes types, they want to trickle people in to the state apparatus. They want to say:

 

“Hey, you know, do you want to join the military? You should join the military! Hey, you want to join border control, you should join border control. You want to be a lawyer, you should become a lawyer. You want to do these things? Do it, and then be our guy on the inside. And then when we take political power, we’ll be able to promote you internally up in the ranks, and you’ll know your guys, and they’ll be on our team.”

 

That’s an interesting theory, and it might work for some small scale stuff, but the kind of scale that we’re talking about that’s necessary to secure the existence of our people in the future for White children needs a complete reshuffle of the state apparatus.

 

[1:16:45]

 

And so what we’re doing is not just building a political movement, or a political party. Sorry, we are building a political movement, but we’re not just building a political party. We’re actually building a state apparatus. We’re building a replacement state apparatus. So that when we take political power and the state apparatus doesn’t do what it’s told, we can just replace them. So re-migration with what army? That’s why people need to consider their physical involvement, not just their political support, not just a donation, or a vote at a ballot box. You need to actually consider yourselves part of a machine, part of a mechanism that can actually not just take state power, but actually enforce state power.

 

So the last point I’ll make on the subject is the historical example of Adolf Hitler. Hitler went through this interesting process where he didn’t need to take totalitarian control as much as people say that he did. He didn’t actually need to.

 

For example, one of the biggest issues he had with the SA* was demobilising them. The SA didn’t want to demobilise. He had two and a half million men. They didn’t want to demobilise. He integrated some of them into the Wehrmacht. And obviously the SS eventually became the Waffen SS, so it became an armed part of the political wing, and it became way bigger as Waffen SS than it ever was as just the SS. But Hitler didn’t need to actually take control of all the state apparatuses. He could just replace some key people and just the machine just started operating as it needed to, because, again, Hitler was in part a reformer. He had a revolutionary ideology, but when he actually took power, the country only had a small percentage of traitors in it, and it was still 99% German.

 

[* The Sturmabteilung (German SA; lit. ’Storm Division’ or ‘Storm Troopers’) was the original paramilitary wing of the NS Party. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. The SA were colloquially called Brownshirts (Braunhemden) because of the colour of their uniform’s shirts, similar to Benito Mussolini’s blackshirts. The official uniform of the SA was a brown shirt with a brown tie. The colour came about because a large shipment of Lettow-shirts, originally intended for the German colonial troops in Germany’s former East Africa colony, was purchased in 1921 by Gerhard Roßbach for use by his Freikorps paramilitary unit. Wikipedia]

 

So we’re dealing with a different situation, where Hitler had the insurance policy. If the Wehrmacht went on strike, or if the Wehrmacht said:

 

“No, actually, we don’t support this regime change, or we don’t support the Reichstag degree, or we don’t., …”

 

You know, if they try to do a coup, they weren’t able to, because he had the SA and he wouldn’t have demobilised the SA, he would have militarized the SA and he would have removed the Wehrmacht from the opinion. So, I’ll say it again and then I’ll finish:

 

“Re-migration with what army?”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think the Austrians are very well organised, like, across the board in their nationalist movement, from what I’ve seen. And there is a lot of behind the scenes organisation there as well. And their activism, street activism, is first class. They’re very impressive. I think we should really study the Austrians and look to them as a model for how to develop the nationalist movement in other European and White countries in general, because they’re one of the leading countries for this.

 

So I think we have to give them a lot of credit. And I do really respect a lot of the guys that have really put in over there over the years. And in many ways, I think the Freedom Party was in, of Austria, was the first, like, modern, like, contemporary style, like, populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party that really existed in Western politics.

 

So there have been innovators, and it’s, I guess, unsurprising that the Austrians are the innovators of the new paradigm. Austrians have a penchant for this kind of thing. And they’re in a unique position because Austria is not in NATO, so they have a little bit more independence.

 

But they’re in the EU.

 

And that’s the thing when also, that’s another aspect of this whole thing about controlling their borders is that, … And they’re aware of this as well, obviously, they really want to create coalitions within the EU to push for EU wide policies, because the EU is, the borders are open within Europe. So if Austria and Hungary and some of these countries are like:

 

“Fuck immigrants!”

 

But the Germans and the French and everything are like bringing immigrants in and they’re dominating the EU, then there’s only so much they can do, because they’re part of the EU. Like, yeah, they can deny asylum applications, they can send some people back, but they can’t have full control over their borders. There has to be a European wide solution.

 

But the fact is that these kinds of parties are rising everywhere and they’re different levels of quality. Like, I think the Austrian populists are far more radical and far better ideologically than the French or the Italian. Like, you know, Meloni’s clique or whatever. There’s Lega, like the League of the North in Salvini’s party in Italy, that’s a little bit better. But I don’t know, Italian politics is a little bit complex. They aren’t as popular, and they still aren’t as radical as the Freedom Party, I think. So but the Germanosphere that seems to be leading the way, like anti-immigration politics are being very successful also in Scandinavia. Like, it’s growing in Sweden, it’s growing in Denmark, obviously in Germany, the AfD is doing fantastically well. So that kind of like central European corridor.

 

I mean, even in the Netherlands, their populist Right party is kind of fucked up! The People’s Party or whatever it is that Geert Wilders runs. Wilders is like mixed race and I think part jewish. And he redirected all that energy into like shilling for Israel and hasn’t really done very much since he got elected to resolve things there.

 

But I think the Freedom Party will do a lot better, if they get in.

 

[1:22:19]

 

Thomas Sewell: They built off a primarily anti-Islam movement. So they were kind of like a Civnatty pro-zionist. It’s kind of like Tommy Robinson, the political party with like a quarter Indonesian Dutch dude.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I think people have this tendency, I saw people saying like:

 

“Oh, who cares about the Freedom Party? Look at what happened with Meloni in Italy.”

 

And it’s like, no! Like, if you understand the history of this party, it was actually like the Freedom Party, by the way, was created by like an SS officer. But it’s not really about that history, that goes back to the fifties. But from the nineties onwards, it’s been kinda kind of a leading party in Europe for the anti-immigration cause. And the Austrian kind of nationalist movement, identitarian movement, is very advanced and has really like, pushed the Overton Window in Austrian politics. And they look to Hungary as a model. And you could say about Viktor Orban in Hungary that he is surrounded by jews. I think he has a jewish wife, and that’s true.

 

But also, like, as far as European leaders go, he’s like the best on immigration and preserving the demographics of his country. That’s just an obvious truth. Obviously Austria, Hungary have historical links, but they’re kind of looking to that as a model.

 

And what’s interesting about that is that what you were talking about before that in Hungary, you have an example of the Right-wing seizing control of the state, not just winning an election, but like actually capturing control of state institutions and, basically kicking out, like reforming the education system and reforming the media and kicking out a lot of elements out of Hungarian society. And Orban calls it a “illiberal democracy” as he doesn’t subscribe to this liberal idea that we’re just going to allow all these NGO’s and like communist and like American backed, jewish backed necessarily. There’s probably some, like Zionist things, institutions that operate in Hungary. But the Left-wing institutions have been really defeated at the institutional level.

 

And now if I was Hungarian, I would vote for Mi Hazánk. I’m sorry if I pronounced that wrong, who seemed to be like a more pure, like, nationalist party that doesn’t have all these jewish links, from what I can see. But just looking at it objectively like, the Hungarian political system is in a much better place than almost any other Western country. And it’s because of embracing a kind of illiberal kind of philosophy. And Martin Sellner has written books about institutional capture and this kind of thing that are very popular in the Freedom Party circles and in the AfD circles in Germany as well, even in Swiss politics. And the leader of the Freedom Party refused many times to disavow Martin Sellner. And they brought up that Sellner did some activism when he was a kid, defacing a synagogue and accusing him of being a neo-Nazi. And Kickl refused to cuck.

 

And so that indicates that the identitarians over there hold a lot of sway, and they aren’t as radical as us, but they’re pretty solid on a lot of the key issues.

 

But it’s something that we need to keep an eye on and watch with keen interests and particularly if they can seize power to see how it goes. And how successful they are, what challenges they run into, because, yeah, there’s nothing like that in Australia. [chuckling] Like, at this stage, we want to build it. We want to build something.

 

But when you look around at the Australian populist Right, I mean, there’s nothing doing. I mean, One Nation is a joke. It’s almost, it’s a toss up whether it’s a joke because Pauline Hanson is an egomaniac, or it’s a joke because that homosexual that basically runs the party, who’s her, you know, top staffer James Ashby is like a Liberal Party operative, like, purposefully sabotaging the party. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s a totally dysfunctional party. Like, what we’re seeing in Europe would be replicated here if One Nation opened itself up to membership. Like, I’ve talked about this before, like, if you become a member of One Nation, you don’t get any voting rights, there’s no branches.

 

So the activist, you know, cadre of the nationalist movement in Australia, there’s no party for them to go into. They can’t go into One Nation and fill it up with fresh, young blood and have all the talent accumulate there and have a kind of dynamic campaign. If they did have something like that, heaps of our guys would be in there. The party would probably be 50% more radical than it is, and they’d probably be getting 15% to 20% of the vote and really challenging the Liberals from the Right. But it’s totally incompetently run.

 

And all the other options, like, what else have you got? Like, you’ve got the United Australia party, Clive Palmer’s outfit, and he basically folds the party and then reconstitutes it just before the election, every election cycle. There’s no continuity, there’s no branches. Again, it’s just all, Clive Palmer just throws money around because he’s a billionaire, in a very arbitrary way. There’s no ideological structure to it and its policies are kind of vapid. And, yeah, there isn’t a lot of other options.

 

Like, it’s interesting, the Libertarian Party seems interesting because I’ve heard noises internally that they’re going to embrace a officially an immigration policy that is totally restrictionist, that is to the right of Pauline Hanson, and One Nation. If they do that would be very interesting because I think there’s a recognition with a lot of the libertarians that libertarianism itself isn’t that popular. You kind of have to mix it with nationalism to get anyone to actually vote for it or care about it.

 

So that’s interesting to see how that develops. But there isn’t really much cooking on the Australian Right.

 

[1:28:24]

 

Meanwhile, our population, like, we have a naturally I think, racially minded and Right-wing population in sentiment, but it’s just totally depoliticised and there’s nothing really engaging within the political system. Like, I was watching a little bit of the vice presidential debate in America the other day and there was all these Americans posting about it on Twitter. And I was thinking to myself:

 

“I’ve never watched a political debate between two Australian politicians before in my life!”

 

I’ve never even had a conversation with someone about, oh, in the debate between, like, I’m sure they have debates. Like, they must have had a debate between Albanese and Morrison for the last election. I didn’t fucking even know it was on TV or care. I don’t think anyone really did. Most of the time, I don’t even remember that the election is on and my mum called, calls me and is like:

 

“Make sure you vote!”

 

Like, I don’t even remember. And I’m like a political guy.

 

And that’s how boring Australian politics is and how disengaging it is so whereas, like, Americans are like:

 

“Oh, my God!”

 

Like, it’s not even the presidential debate. It’s like JD Vance versus, I can’t remember the other guy’s name. vv Tim Walz or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s totally uninteresting. But like this, it’s like this big thing and there’s like tens of millions tuning in and like, it’s a big deal. It’s like:

 

“Got to watch the game, got to watch the debate!”

 

Kind of thing.

 

So, yeah, we don’t have a society like that. And I think that’s part of, part of the problem, maybe part of the solution ultimately could be if it’s like judo flipped against the establishment. What’s the term you always use, Tom? You say they’re all, … You need to use the term “skin suits”. You use the terminal “skeleton crews”, all the major parties.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. It is a skeleton crew. Our capture of Australian politics and the state apparatus is going to be extremely slow and painful and nothing is going to happen. And then it’s going to be really quick. It’s going to be really quick and everything’s going to happen. Because they’re just so stretched thin. And there’s no genuine interest. Like the political parties themselves. The Greens are actually going to be the hardest party to defeat because they have the most, … And obviously, when the Muslims finally mobilise, they will be quite difficult. But the Liberal Party and Labor Party, … It’s interesting that our goals align actually quite nicely with just the way things are going to be moving. The Liberal Party is actually the easiest party to destroy out of the big three. Even though it’s usually the most powerful, it’s actually the easiest to destroy. It’s just held in place by some private school boys and jewish money. That’s really all that’s holding it in place, so.

 

But do you want to get onto the Superchats? We’ve covered all the topics for tonight, or most of them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we can. You said you wanted me to pull up that Noticer article. I got it here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we can go through a little bit of current affairs.

 

Joel Davis: So this is the woman charged with the Hezbollah flag. She looks like a ganger from Bankstown kind of thing. Sarah Mouhanna. So some Lebo [Lebanese] chick.

 

Anyway, that not a particularly interesting story, frankly, if I’m totally honest.

 

 

Thomas Sewell: But I didn’t want you to necessarily pull it up to discuss it. I just wanted, if you could pull it up. Yeah, it was a funny article.

 

Joel Davis: This is interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was kind of funny that the poster girl was pretty good optics as far as Lebs [Lebanese] are concerned. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] Yeah, that’s funny. Yeah, it’s kind of weird!

 

Thomas Sewell: They were joking in the chat, like:

 

“Oh, you know, Jacob’s going through the illegal symbols. This girl’s going through the illegal symbols. Maybe they could do a stream together.”

 

Joel Davis: I don’t need any more Syrian Girl, One Struggle nonsense, I don’t think.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] thought it was funny!

 

Joel Davis: I saw Syrian Girl got upset at me because I said, all Muslims should be deported. Or I said something like:

 

“All these sand people problems wouldn’t be our problem if we had the White Australia Policy. Like these sand people, ethnic disputes, and they should all be deported.”

 

And then she was like:

 

“Oh, but like, Zionists are terrorists, too. And the jews!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, like, jews are sand people as well, to me, as well. You’re all sand people. You should all be deported!”

 

And she was happy with that. She’s like:

 

“Well, at least you’re consistent.”

 

Whatever that means.

 

But it’s like:

 

“Just get the out of my country. You’re brown!”

 

That’s kind of my attitude towards these ethnic women. I’m not interested in one struggling with from the Arab world they’re like nine or ten out of tens [in beauty] is really, like, mid at best. So it’s not even worth it.

 

[1:33:46]

 

 

 

But yeah, this abomination is in Martin Place in Sydney in the middle of the city. And this is disgusting! Because it’s like, literally 50 meters from the Lindt Café where there was an Islamic, … It was like a terrorist attack. It was like a siege. And like, two White Australian women, I believe, died in that siege. He executed one and another one died because of stray bullets in some kind of shootout exchange with the police. And now we’ve got this black Islamic cube nonsense! I mean, it’s fucking disgusting!

 

Yeah, I mean, it speaks for itself.

 

And that’s the thing, like, I talked about this and there were people getting upset at me online that, like:

 

“Oh, you’re just playing into what the jews want you to say. The jews want you to hate Muslims!”

 

It’s like, wait a second, wait a second. I don’t have to fucking accept this crap in the middle of the first city the biggest city of my country, 50 meters from where a Muslim committed a terrorist attack. I don’t have to accept this crap being built in the middle of my city. This is disgusting! Why the fuck is this alien religion having its monuments built in the middle of my city? It’s fucking absurd!

 

Like, it’s possible to fucking hate jews and Muslims at the fucking same time and want them both out at the same time. Like, I don’t have to go easy on the Muslims and just let them get away with mobilising within my society and raping White women and putting themselves about with this kind of total disrespectful bravado and just be like:

 

“Oh, yes, but, like we’re on the same side against Israel!”

 

That’s fucking cucked! Like, fuck them!

 

So, yeah, but what do you think about this monument? Do you have thoughts?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I agree with David Hiscox with his article. It is just another humiliation ritual. I saw some libtard saying:

 

“Oh there’s no need to get so offended by its only temporary.”

 

It’s like, I don’t give a fuck whether it’s temporary or not. It has no place in our society. I’m offended by it. And gone are the days where the conservative talking point, was:

 

“Oh, you know, facts don’t care about feelings, or if you’re offended by it, good.”

 

It’s like, no, what offends White people, what is egregious towards White people and White culture and our customs should be illegal, straight up. We should have the laws that the Left are trying to put in place where we can’t hurt the feelings of brown people. It should be the other way around. If you’re a foreigner and you’ve come to our country, you’re a Muslim or you’re some other, you’re not of European descent and you’ve come here, I mean, if you’re a tourist, you play the game, you play by the rules you visit the sites and you go home to your country. That, like, that’s what, I don’t know if that’s a healthy society that has tourists, but that’s what a liberal, like a White nationalist liberal democracy would have. It would have foreign tourists in it. And these people are just overstaying they’re welcome. They’re rubbing it in. They’re just looking for a fight to put those kind of displays up. And the traitors exacerbate it as. Well, I mean, as I said, once we’ve dealt with the traitors and we will deal with the traitors, once we’ve dealt with them, the Muslims and all these other ethnic groups are going to come to the table and they’re going to say:

 

“Okay, you guys are obviously pretty serious. So what are we going to do about this?”

 

You know, there’s, it’s going to be pretty straightforward. What’s going to happen? I don’t think there’s going to be, … Well, again, it depends on the timeline. It depends on the timeline.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’d be pretty easy to just put them on boats and fuck them off. The real issue is the White traitors that are holding us back and preventing us from asserting ourselves with their cuckoldry. I always say this, and it’s so important to reiterate, we can talk about the jews and other non-Whites, but ultimately what it comes down to is that we aren’t resisting this with almost any of our strength.

 

In fact, more of our race, like, our race, is doing more to contribute to our own destruction than it’s contributing to resisting it. So that’s the issue. If we got enough White people together, organised to resist it, we would easily defeat it and restore ourselves. It’s totally within our capability. We don’t need anyone but ourselves to fix this, but we need to find ourselves to fix it.

 

And right now, you know, bar, a few of us, people are like, lost, depoliticised, cucked, you know, cowardly asleep, whatever, you know whatever the case may be. And they need to be engaged, and then we can fix the problem. But that’s literally all it comes down to. It’s like it’s within the hearts and minds of the White race that this is either solved or not solved and nowhere else.

 

And that’s why I don’t believe in really giving a shit about the sensibilities of Muslims or soliciting any kind of association with them whatsoever!

 

[1:39:02]

 

And also this view that, like:

 

“Oh, we should go easy on the Muslims because hating Israel is really in right now, and we don’t want to present ourselves in a way that is going to alienate people.”

 

It’s like hating Muslims is in right now as well. Muslims didn’t become popular anytime recently. There were polls done around ten years ago on Australians attitudes to Islamic immigration. And the majority of Australians said in that poll that they want Islamic immigration completely stopped to Australia. They want a total ban on Islamic immigration. That included, like, it broke it down by party affiliation. That included like, 33% of Greens voters and 40% of Labour voters. So, like, a very substantial, like, more than a third of Left-wing voters are against Islamic immigration. That’s an old poll, but, it’s not a popular position to be pro-muslim. People don’t like them. And particularly in Europe they’re the most hated group, really, because they’re the largest and they’ve committed the most amount of crimes and then the most objectionable to deal with in public. And they’ve raped and murdered countless of our people. So, yeah that doesn’t actually make any sense. It’s actually harder to explain to the average White person the problem with jews because, yeah, White people are against Israel on the Left, but they’re not against jews. Like, they’re against “zionism”, quote unquote, which is completely different in their minds. It’s not different in reality, but it’s different in their minds.

 

So, yeah, obviously we have to educate the people about the jewish problem. But we’re going to alienate people that have patriotic sentiment, that are already kind of somewhat like spiritually aligned to our message if we don’t talk about the racial issues that they have to deal with in a more direct way that they already somewhat understand. Like, the average patriotic White Aussie already doesn’t like Muslims coming into our country. They already have an issue with the Indians.

 

And so the idea that we should sacrifice talking about that and just purely fixate upon the jews is like this autistic Internet ideology that doesn’t actually bear any resemblance to real life. And some people justify it by saying:

 

“Oh, but Goebbels said that we should just focus everything on the jew.”

 

And it’s like, yeah, it’s because in 1920s, 1930s Germany, there were no fucking Muslims! There were no pajeets! There were no chinks. Right? So why would they focus on them? They weren’t even fucking there. Like, it’s not that complicated.

 

But, yeah, anyway, we can get into the Superchats. Adolf Caesar said:

 

“Good evening, gentlemen. What are your thoughts on using Australian culture and folklore and using terms like, quote, ‘mateship’? Would that be effective rhetoric for Australian NS?”

 

What would you say to that, Tom? You’re muted.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think we’re incorporating it very well, already. You can see a lot of the speeches that I’ve done personally in the past and the things that we’ve focused on. I mean, our biggest rallies have been Australia Day in Victoria there have been things like Eureka Stockade. So we are trying to revitalise Australian folklore. We are focusing on what some would call the “Nativist angle”.

 

Jacob has even extensively worked for the last three years to revitalise the original Australian sort of folklore anthems, like the White Australia song, which was probably the second most popular song in Australia 100 years ago after the national anthem. And, yeah, I think we’re already doing a good job. Could we do more of it? Yeah, sure, we could do more of everything. I think what we have to focus on the most at the moment is, well, from a purely cultural perspective, hmm, I don’t think that’s our main focus culturally at the moment. I think our main focus socioculturally is making everyday, average Australians, working Australians, making them more politically motivated, making them politically charged. And so appealing to that kind of what is now more of a niche, well, I don’t think the purpose of us doing it is to appeal to that niche. We’re not doing it to appeal to people that have that as a personal subculture, this niche folklore, Nativist type attitude. We’re actually doing it as an act of preservation and Cultural Revolution or cultural rebirth.

 

So we’re actually doing it as a back end cultural process. Our front end is to try to capture as much attention to our important talking points, like mass deportations or living space for White people or destroy pedo freaks or whatever is. That’s our front end.

 

And then in the background, certainly, to do a cultural shift within our membership and within the people that are engaged within our politics. That’s my answer.

 

Joel Davis: Like, for me, it’s got to be organic. Like, we’re already naturally Australian, so we express our own cultural attitudes in an organic way. That’s good.

 

But then this kind of contrived, like, parochial, like, kind of harkening back to some bygone era of the stereotype of what Australiana was about. Like, that can come across as quite cringe if you’re kind of overdoing it, I think. And also it’s kind of alienating. So it has to be authentic.

 

Like, obviously we expressed our Australian character and attitude, but we don’t want to act like Boomers or whatever just to kind of recapture some old Australiana. Like, we’ve got to relate to young White people in the current era and how we conduct ourselves.

 

And I think we do that pretty successfully.

 

But, yeah, somewhat like the legacy of White Australia, though. Like, what you were talking about with Jacob, you know, trying to preserve, like, old songs and, like the phrase “Australia for the Whiteman”, that’s a classic political slogan that predates Australian Federation. Like, we believe in honouring the traditional White Australian nationalism because we’re the successors to that. Like, we inherit that tradition. And that’s spiritually very important that we connect ourselves to that because we’re trying to continue on that project of our ancestors, of our forefathers.

 

So in that sense, yeah. But this idea that we’ve got to be super parochial and use the word “mateship” all the time. I mean politicians do that. Like, you hear Anthony Albanese and shit like that talk about “mateship”, and it sounds cringe. Like, I don’t want to become some, like, cringe cliche Lord. I would rather just talk like a normal White Aussie into 2024 talks, so that people realise that I’m just like them on a certain level rather than, like, as I said some kind of contrived you know, set of cliches. I got another Superchat here from, one second, from Apollonian JL. He said:

 

“Have you read the Myth of the 20th Century by Alfred Rosenberg? And do you really think that non-northwest Europeans can assimilate into Anglo Saxon Australia?”

 

I have read the Myth of the 20th Century. I’m actually thinking of doing a podcast, or a series of podcasts on that book down the line.

 

[1:46:59]

 

So if you want to get the Joel Davis take on that text, we’re not doing it now in the Superchat, it’s too big.

 

But obviously, in that text, Rosenberg goes over, you know what he sees as the kind of unique character of the Germanic European, but he also talks about the Aryan Greeks and the similarities and differences between, like, northwest Europeans and the ancient Greeks. It’s quite an interesting discussion, and I think a lot of his assessments are accurate. And obviously, Australians are Celto-Germanic peoples. That’s what the Constitution of the nation is if you look at the data, like, on the racial demographics of White Australians, we’re, over 90% plus Celto-Germanic. There’s a little bit of Slavic and Mediterranean DNA here, but it’s a small minority.

 

So that’s the character of the nation. That’s the founding stock, and that gives our national character, and that’s what the majority of us are. And a lot of the people who have some ancestors from southern or Eastern Europe are mixed, like, with northwest European.

 

So the amount of people that are pure southern European or pure Eastern European are actually quite small, and we’re not really getting much immigration from those parts of the world now. Like, the Whites that immigrate to Australia are mostly northwest European. They’re mostly coming from Britain or Ireland, or sometimes from Germany or Scandinavia or America. They’re not really coming from those places.

 

So I would anticipate that through the generations, they’ll just become more and more fused with the founding stock population, and there won’t be very, very many pure Italians or pure Ukrainians or anything like that left in Australia.

 

So I think we should just focus on that Celto-Germanic kind of cultural foundation for understanding ourselves, and that’s what we are. And if you’re someone that has mixed ancestry or ancestry from southern or Eastern Europe, then if you want to be an Australian, you kind of have to assimilate into that. I think we can be inclusive to the ones that genuinely want to assimilate and over time, they’ll just kind of mix in with the rest of us down the generations.

 

So people might say that, like from a Puritan standpoint, that’s a big problem. I always say, though, like, if you’re a Croatian who lives in Australia and you really care more about being Croatian than you care about being Australian, I don’t personally understand why you wouldn’t move to Croatia, as an example, back to Croatia. That’s true for any group. Like, if you’re a German and you live here and you care more about Germany than Australia, why are you here? Like, I don’t really understand. Like, for me, like, I’m an Anglo Saxon, so then it’s easy for me to be like, well, Australia, because I’m of the founding stock, so I can identify with the country.

 

So I don’t really know what that’s like to feel like a kind of ethnic minority. But if I felt like Australia, I didn’t really identify with Australia as much as I identified with Britain, I would literally move to Britain and just start a life there and focus on, like, returning to the land of my ancestors, if that’s how I felt.

 

So I don’t really understand why you would like these groups that they want, like, almost Australia to become multicultural and to be:

 

“Super accepting, of Australia is not primarily an Anglo or Celto-Germanic people, it’s just European. And whether you’re Macedonian or Bulgarian or Anglo, it doesn’t matter.”

 

It does actually matter. And our national culture is a specific way for a specific reason. And if you truly love Australia, you would respect that.

 

But, yeah, the people from those places that want to embrace that, I am accepting of I’m not like, so I might get caught a cuck by the Nordicist, like, hyper Nordicist people. But I think that it doesn’t really make any sense, the position that we’re in right now, to be alienating those people if they’re going to fight for our race and for White Australia alongside us, they are pretty similar to us. Like, they are of the same race as us, even if they’re of a different subgroup of the race. It doesn’t existentially threaten who we are to be inclusive to them. Like, it just simply doesn’t.

 

Whereas being inclusive to non-Whites does. Like, that literally completely undermines the racial character.

 

So that’s how I see it. But if they get offended by that idea that shows that they’ve got a hostility. If you’re someone of Italian descent and you’re getting offended that I’m saying Australia was founded by Anglo Saxons and that it’s a Celto-Germanic nation, then I’m sorry, you need to fucking go! You’re part of the problem! Because you literally don’t respect Australia, you don’t fucking respect our national history. And the literal, like, racial stock that founded the fucking country! Like, so you’re basically an anti-Australian. You know, you have the mentality of these other non-White immigrants, basically. You’re trying to undermine Australia’s identity to fit you. And you’re getting angry at a founding stock Australian for having my own identity and asserting it. So you have to join our team. We don’t have to join your team. That’s the way I see it. Tom probably doesn’t want to go into that. We’ve answered that question too many times. RSA Liberty, …

 

[1:52:44]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the fifth time we’ve had that question.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. RSA Liberty said:

 

“Fuhrer, is the first hundred man march going to be the next national meet? Issue the order!”

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] I hope that that’s someone that’s involved in the organisation asking that question. I won’t go into too many details, but we have been doing account of who we think we can put forward.

 

And obviously that’s not including the recruitment that we’re going to have between now and then. I think the next national is going to be very impressive. I’ll leave it at that. I’m not going to say a number because it’s still in the air, but., …

 

Joel Davis: It’s always difficult getting everyone in the country to go to one place like that. Always presents challenges.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, recruitment’s been good and it’s looking good!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m sure if it was a Zoom call, if it was a Zoom call, national meetup, we’d have a thousand people on the Zoom call. But because it’s not a Zoom call and there’s a lot of logistics involved, and cost as well. A lot of our members are young and it’s a big cost to travel to the other side of Australia or whatever, but we try to make it a holiday, we try to make it an adventure as well. So that way that they’re getting something out of it at a personal level, not just as a concept of duty.

 

So it’ll be impressive. I hope you’re involved and yeah, January is some time away. It’s over three months away. So if guys want to get involved between now and then you’re going to have to be involved for probably a couple weeks, or a couple months to be able to get the orders for where it is so get involved now. At this stage, it’s mostly under wraps. Will we go public? Maybe a couple weeks, or a month out? Maybe there’s a chance we’ve done that in the past, certainly with two of the national meets in Victoria. We went public with it. Obviously, Sydney and Brisbane weren’t. We didn’t go public with it until the last minute that we were there. And that’s just because if you look at the pressure, the police pressure we had.

 

So, anyway, I’ll leave it there. I won’t go any further. But you better be involved, [word unclear], if you’re going to make comments like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, come to nationals. Like, get involved now. You come to nationals, you’ll get to see Tom fight someone in the ring. I’ll fight someone. Blair said he wanted to get into a punch on at nationals in the ring. So you get to watch your favourite streamers punch on IRL. Racist UFC. It’s Keno.

 

Thomas Sewell: A whole weekend of racism!

 

Joel Davis: We’re gonna have a lot of fun, so, yeah, obviously we’ll be doing some activism. I’m not looking forward, to be honest, at the 10k run.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But got to do it. Got to smash it out!

 

Thomas Sewell: Get ready for the 10k run. I did a 4K run tonight and it wasn’t at a good speed, I’ll tell you that. But it actually, it felt fine. It was easy to do it. I just wasn’t very fast. So I’m hoping to drop ten kilos and get my speed back.

 

Joel Davis: I did it. I did a I just did a 2.4, like, locally tonight and, yeah, it wasn’t too bad. Yeah. But I’m nowhere near the fitness level that I’ll be at nationals. Because over the wintertime, we haven’t really been running. I’ve just been lifting weights and putting on, like, chungus. You know, I might look a little less bulked because I literally lost, like, eight kilos in the last month because I’ve just been trying to cut weight so I can get my run time up and we’re getting back into kickboxing and stuff. And, yeah, I was punching harder, but I was punching harder for 45 seconds, and then I was starting to breathe heavy. So what’s the point? [chuckling]

 

Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Buy yourselves a based, racist looking sandwich or an extra racist, wholesome chungus roast cooked by someone’s grandma.”

 

Well, I don’t think grandma is charging $10 to eat roast. You know, that’s why we love the grandmas, because the grandmas they got a, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe we can get a bottle of San Pellegrino or something for when we go visit grandma.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we got to take something. We got to take little chocolates or something for Grandma.

 

Thomas Sewell: Grandma wants chocolate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but, like, these days, with inflation, a $10 sandwich? Get the fuck! Get the hell out of here! You’re not buying anything. Like, what is this, 2018? Like, yeah, the jews have fucked us. Immigration has fucked us. You know, you can’t buy a sandwich for less than $20 now. It’s ridiculous! That’s not your fault, of course.

 

But as I said, I blame the jews. I blame ZOG. Fuck ZOG!

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe I should get a racist sandwich with that Max Caruso guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s obviously a reference to that Max Caruso interview that you did a few years ago.

 

[1:57:36]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I hope he puts up the full interview. Not the full interview, but, yeah, the snippet he put up was very small. Like, there was one point where he was saying, like, he was asking if he has to go back to Italy. This kind of ties in with that long winded question that we answer every stream. But he said:

 

“Do I have to go back to Italy?”

 

And I was like:

 

“What are you talking about?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Well, I’m not White. I’m Italian.”

 

I was like:

 

“What? What are you talking about?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Well, isn’t that how it is? Like, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, you’re doing the meme. Do you really feel that way? Do you feel like you’re not White? Do you feel like you’re much different to me?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know. I never really thought about, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, I didn’t realise you were Italian. I mean, obviously your last name’s Caruso, so I figured you were like, you had some sort of Mediterranean influence in you, but, yeah, like, it’s cool, bro. You can stay. Like, you’re White. You and any Italian that acts and behaves and looks like you can stay. You’re all right. You’re one of the boys.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, cool. Well, yeah, maybe I can get on board with this is all right!”

 

That’s pretty funny. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: That’s probably why he didn’t put it in the video, because he didn’t want to come across as too sympathetic.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he would have cut that.

 

Joel Davis: But I saw he uploaded, because he uploaded to YouTube, and it did reasonably well, but then he uploaded a section of it to TikTok, and that went crazy on TikTok! It got like last time I checked, like, 300k views or something so maybe it’s more now, I don’t know. I haven’t even checked back in. So Tik Tok is great for viral racist content. Hitler’s going viral on TikTok. TikTok had to shut down all the Hitler speeches because they kept going insane! And it became a meme where people would be like put the Hitler English AI translation, and they’d be, like, dubbing it with their face, but then putting them in the humourous situations where they’re upset at their girlfriend or waiting in line or they’re in these frustrating, you know, interpersonal situations, and they’re just channeling, like, Hitler’s rage! And that just became the new TikTok trend. 2024 is cool! [chuckling]

 

When we sat on the show a few months ago, the vibe has shifted. Some people doubted it, but there’s no doubting that the vibe has shifted. The vibe has definitely shifted.

 

Yeah. What else we got here in the someone Odysee. In Reality said:

 

“Finally catching a live stream. It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people!”

 

Well, thanks, In reality. Glad you enjoyed the stream. And GoyBoy1488 said:

 

“He’s taken a week off politics, but he wanted to pop in and support his favourite Aussies. How do we feel about small breaks? Does that go against the quote? ‘We will never slacken, never tire.’ See you next week.”

 

Thomas Sewell: You got to be tactical. You got to be tactical with your breaks. You got to have a reset. You got a rest between sets. Yeah.

 

Because if you don’t have small breaks, you’ll break. You’ll like the whole point of having these small breaks. Sorry, I’m being distracted. I can hear Luna calling my name, which is odd for her. I don’t know why she’s talking in her sleep. Well, she’s not asleep. She’s already woken up.

 

But, yeah, now you can’t, … The first couple of years I was involved with politics, I went really hard, and I learnt very quickly that you kind of, it affects your mental capacity, it affects your intelligence, it affects your stress levels. You have to learn to enjoy the struggle. And that’s one of the important principles of this, is that it’s a marathon, not a sprint, and you have to learn how to enjoy it. You have to learn how to take time off and deload and rest, and you come back better! You come back a lot better.

 

But most people don’t even do enough to take a break. Most people just need to change their lifestyle so that they can afford more energy towards nationalism, because 99% of people that consider themselves nationalists, don’t actually do anywhere near what they’re capable of doing. It’s not them that needs breaks. They need lifestyle changes so that more of their effort is dedicated towards nationalism, which starts with getting involved in real life.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m someone that doesn’t take a lot of breaks and just kind of keep, like, chipping away at things with, yeah, very seldom do I actually. And maybe that’s bad. Maybe I should recharge the battery sometime, because, I don’t know, that’s more my approach, kind of just keep plugging away.

 

But it’s a personality thing. Some people really need time on their own. And I know, for example, Blair is like that. Because Blair is someone who, he’s got a lot of energy output, so if he can kind of burn himself out very quickly. He’s got to manage his energy distribution. So it’s a personality thing.

 

[2:02:49]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I benefit a lot from being alone. Like, I’ve noticed that the greatest periods of political growth, like, sorry, not political growth, but personal growth. The greatest personal growth that I’ve been through has been when I’ve been alone, not just prison, but just in general.

 

So I think being alone, truly alone, like, without distraction, is extremely important for personal growth. And that would be considered a break because for me, one of the biggest parts, I don’t have a massive social battery.

 

So one of the biggest parts of nationalism that’s quite taxing for me is dealing with lots of humans. I wouldn’t say I’m extroverted or introverted. I’m probably in the middle somewhere, but you have to be pretty extroverted to be a political character, a political leader. And a lot of people., … Look, if there’s 200 people that want your time, you don’t have 200 people’s worth of time.

 

And a lot of people, they want your time. They know who you are, they admire you or they respect you or whatever, or they just want to have a conversation with you. But you don’t have 200 people’s time for them. You have you have one 200th of a person’s time for them. And that, not to be rude. When I first got sort of like popular or famous, however you want to put it, infamous. Like, when my Telegram went from like 200 followers to like 15,000 or something, I noticed that a lot in, whenever I was online, I would just get so many DM’s, and it got to the point where I had to take my Direct Messenger off my public Telegram.

 

That’s why it’s not on my public Telegram anymore. If, you know what it is, you know what it is, but I don’t advertise it anymore because I don’t want direct messages. You either want to get involved or you don’t. I just don’t have time. I mean, I was talking to Joel about Twitter recently, and he keeps telling me to get my Twitter back up. But again, like, having the Twitter DM’s open is like as soon as I opened the Twitter DM’s, just immediately it started flooding in. And it’s just paragraphs and paragraphs and paragraphs, and it’s all good faith. It’s all people wanting advice and people explaining how they’re inspired and this is what they want to do. And it’s awesome! It’s awesome stuff!

 

But, yeah, I just try to direct people towards like, a local representative or local leader because, yeah, otherwise I’ll burn out. I’ve done it before. I’ve done it in the past. I’ve responded to every single message. I mean, I’ve got about. Shit! I can show you my phone. I got like 999 unread personal messages on my phone. I just don’t open personal messages anymore unless they’re from, like, someone that I know or deal with in person or they’re a representative of a movement already. I just don’t have the energy for. I’ll burn out! I’ll burn out and I’ll have to go hide in my room for like, three days and not come out. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I think I have a little bit more social battery than you to an extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you do you do.

 

Joel Davis: But even still, I get overwhelmed as well by the same thing. People really, they expect your time. Like, they expect you to. Like, okay, they get offended. It’s like you don’t understand the amount, the sheer quantity of people that are trying to talk to me all the time. It just becomes overwhelming and then I just lose track of it. Like it just gets dropped. It just goes into vertical scroll. And it happens even to my own family or my own friends. Like, I’ll see they message me and be like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got to go back to that.”

 

And then just so much crap fills everything up that I just forget to check back in.

 

Thomas Sewell: I still get probably half a dozen random messages a day. But it’s a huge improvement in the quality of the messages, certainly, I think, because you can only get my direct message through someone that already knows it. So that helps. Unless they’re just lucky and they just search it.

 

Yeah, I’m gonna call it a night.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, we’re done. This is the last Superchat is just a statement. A Hitler quote from Keep Asking for Truth, saying:

 

“From my dead body, my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.”

 

And I guess we can end it there. Also saw Hitler’s Big Toe asking me if I was drinking breast milk. No, it was raw milk.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: You know, if I had this much breast milk, I’d give it a crack and see how it is. I’ll give you a review. I could do a review bro on breast milk, but I don’t have a pregnant wife at the moment. I wouldn’t want to be drinking some random bitches breast milk. That’s weird!

 

So anyway, we’ll end the show there.

 

Thomas Sewell: No comment on the breast milk question. No comment! Good night. Hail Hitler!

 

Joel Davis: See you guys later.

 

[2:07:49]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of Oct 8, 2024 = 151)

HyperChat min: 100

@BMC1488
4 days ago
Australia for the White Man! o//

8
1
jojoNora
2 days ago
I wish we could clone a Joel for each Western country.

3
1
Hide replies
MrWebster
1 day ago
same can be said for Tom and Blair!

1
0

@katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript:
[Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following:
Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments.
Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel.
Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.”
Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews.
Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.”
Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters.
They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts.
Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.”
Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints.
Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform.
Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe.
Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia.
Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia.
Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities.
Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia.
Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism.
More, …
Less

1
1
Mr
4 days ago
Q: After the zombie apocalypse occurs and Western Civilization collapses, where do Joel Davis followers think that White civilization will rise and re-establish itself as the globe’s premiere society….Europe, North America, or Australia?

2
0
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
Keith woods is a pseudo intellectual pussy, and even maybe a grifter.

6
4
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
are they talking about him? you have a time stamp by any chance?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee like watch the stream

1
3
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
umm gee thanks for nothing lol

0
1
Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee your welcome lol

The Crucible 01
4 days ago(edited)
Honestly cant remember where they mentioned him, 45 minutes in i think. lol

Wesselmania
4 days ago
full-on “grifter” is a stretch.. his weakness is fame-seeking

Heartland
3 days ago
Keith puts his head above the anti-white parapet. What do you do to defend the white race?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
3 days ago
oh of course because i dont make streams i dont do enough in defense of my race, piss off with that dribble, I could ask you the same question. On fact let me ask you this does Keith get money for what he does?

InReality
4 days ago
review “bra” get it?

1
1
MrWebster
15 hours ago(edited)
Tom and Joel think I am too extreme and insane on this. But basically I believe once Us White nationalist retake our own nations again and deport all the Non Whites out our Nations. We as Whites must then think in a Supramacist and World Conquering vision. Where we will have no choice but to create an Anti white Ethnic artificial disease that makes all whites on Earth immune to this disease. But once this disease is released on all corners of planet earth. Once invented and released against non whites, it will wipe out more than 70% of all Non whites on earth. After the first sucessful wipeout run, we as whites would need to siege all non white Nuclear and Weapons cache arsenal before they can use it against us. We will have to in next couple of years wipe out the last non whites vestiges on planet earth down to the last single Man, Woman and child towards total genetic Extinction. We will have to also eliminate all genitic tissue dna of non whites, preserving non white DNA will be a very treasonous crime resulting in executions. We all have to come to the final solution as white people that all non whites have to be driven towards extinction to ensure White Survival in 21st century. There is no alternative to this solution. They want us extinct, we should drive their extinction. Peaceful/tolerant coexistence is mere deception and illusion.
Less

1
0
Smokey
4 days ago
I feel this chat is a little boring now. Why no comments?

1
0
Weltenesche
8 hours ago
It shows you don’t know too much about Austrian politics. The Freedom Party is extremely philosemetic and their leadership makes regular trips to Israel. They’re also civnats and have put out ads about how “great” it is that Turks are voting for them and how Turks are welcome and accepted in the Freedom Party. Honestly the best advertisements for the Freedom Party came from the Greens and the Liberals, comparing Kickl to Hitler

Heartland
3 days ago
1:05:32
is that raw milk Thomas is drinking?! >>> !

Archipelago Woes
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
JoelTom

InReality
4 days ago
o/

Randall_Waffen
4 days ago
o/

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
wp

DOLO
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
ooops

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
It’s a public forum. Why don’t you try to add something of value to the conversation? Be the change you wish to see instead of whining.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
That’s ironic.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
are you serious? Weren’t you just comment policing just a min ago? Very feminine behavior.

DOLO
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
I’m excited to see!

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@smokey
Mostly replying but I’ll shurrup now o7 o/

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

InReality
4 days ago
“i feel like” lol

Smokey
4 days ago

@InReality
Okay, thanks.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
speak up then, bub!

Smokey
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning

@InReality
I feel like you’re dominating the chat. Why not lot other people post a comment?

InReality
4 days ago
We should call raw milk “white powerade”. Not sure if Aussies know what Powerade is but it’s an American sports drink.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Didn’t some “Turks” try to blow up a railway in Ballarat circa 1920?

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
cheers

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@InReality
IKR? I removed the comments btw.

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
can you imagine the media scrambling to decide what to say about that? “Do we support the muslims or the lgbtp???”

ThinRedLine
4 days ago
howdy

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i haven’t seen a non white in tent cities full of white Australians

InReality
4 days ago

@CampsLindburgh
kebabs

WaffleStake
4 days ago
pain

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
god?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
what’s in the box

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Lindt cafe siege

InReality
4 days ago
White World Policy

Smokey
4 days ago
Does Syrian Girl live in Australia still?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
All in one? I’ll have a look

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
Alex Linder did that one too

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Pete Quinones on Odysee did a reading of “Camp of the Saints”. It’s in his playlist.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Palmer is the archetypal example of the goy billionaire wasting his wealth on vanity project

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Camp of Saints, horrifying in some ways. but also it describes the fruits of the do-gooder mentality, overrun by the stinking muds, which is kind of satisfying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Many have Brazilian links, geneticaly. Ditto with Chinese ancestry. Look at world maps & it makes sense.

InReality
4 days ago
Austria: home of the original leader!

WaffleStake
4 days ago
in Tassie?

InReality
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
That’s how it starts, huh.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
now we have the inbred rapey ones

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
we had those more white seeming ones about 10 years ago

WaffleStake
4 days ago
on the other hand all the “kiwis” we have are islanders, not Anglo

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no need to go to India when India comes to you…

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
They’ll be Brahmans – the richer caste.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i agree that they shouldn’t be here simply because this isn’t their country

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Queensland is the suburbs. There are lots of them here to be sure, but they seem to be white presenting in their behaviour for the most part.

InReality
4 days ago
FORTRESS EUROPE NOW

DOLO
4 days ago
Rohem was the leader of the SA before the putsch

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
How can they be part Brazilian?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
needs a completely different moral foundation. with pro-14 words as 1st principle

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
Help this channel grow! Repost and like the Twitter if you can guys.
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1841790466012102935

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Maori aren’t merely Polynesian. They were part Brazilian & Chinese before they also miscegenated with Europeans.

InReality
4 days ago
Love the milk

BASEDVLAD
4 days ago
White Power Drink \o

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no, I’ve heard of it tho. sounds horrifying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
True Have you read Camp of the Saints?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Have you been to India/Pak/Bang?

InReality
4 days ago
The level of focused seriousness and decorum these Aussie’s have is really appealing to me.

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
English politics is the option of being fucked from the front or from behind

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Ah right. I’m not sure which state, but I’m not sure how you’ve avoided the smelly lower caste Indians who ruin every public space

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
all it takes is proper internet censorship & its game over

InReality
4 days ago
Low-caste Indians especially are rapey, scamming street shitters.

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Australia

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Until beef isn’t allowed on your BBQ?

InReality
4 days ago
One of the things that did it for me was all the indian scammer videos on youtube. And the travel vlogs. Check out Bald and Bankrupt’s latest video on India

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
which country are you in, Waffle?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
personally I haven’t had problems with Indians but my personal experience is irrelevant

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Yeah Indians are disgusting

InReality
4 days ago
I have to say, I have a particular distaste for Indians.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
there are more Asians in New Zealand than Maoris

DOLO
4 days ago
Yeah, it’ll be Indians at a guess

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
Hello London

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Indians

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Asian, islanders

DOLO
4 days ago

@InReality
Hobits

InReality
4 days ago
wtf??? NZ 55% white? Who is moving there, asians?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
The THEY are already tying themselves in their own knots.

DOLO
4 days ago
Trump also said that America needs more legal migrants.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
No need for a drivers licence if you can’t legally pay for one? Hmmmm.

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
Even Hitler had the Berghof. Everyone needs to recharge the vital energies.

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago

@InReality
o/

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
o/ have a nice break

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago
$14.88
taking a week off of politics, but wanted to pop in an support my favorite Ausies. How do you two feel about small breaks? Does that go against “we will never slacken, never tire…”? See you next week!

InReality
4 days ago
I assume that the Germans who thought that the NSDAP were too extreme and unoptical probably changed their minds once life got a lot better for them because of Hitler.

@TimeToWakeUp
4 days ago
Whatever “evils” Whites are capable of, non-whites would do in a worse fashion ten times over

Svxdrifter
4 days ago

@lewpers

@lewpers
4 days ago
The mudslimes are not going home until the jew issue is solved first, never forget that. As such, the latter is technically the more pressing issue.

InReality
4 days ago
Daniel’s statement is very telling.

InReality
4 days ago
$20.00
Finally catching a live stream! It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people!

Harry Holler
4 days ago
with zero sense of irony

Harry Holler
4 days ago
Joel, Barry Weiss accused the Qataris as “having dual loyalty”.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Then ASIO is turned against the White population

InReality
4 days ago
What’s up, based Aryan chads?

Whiterabbit
4 days ago
Frank Lowy was in the Irgun who shot British soldiers

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
plus russia runs their own missile protections in both iran and syria from what i understand

DanTheOracle
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
yea russia gave them their new fighter jets not long ago and they already have i think its s400 missile protection

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Macron lost ‘3rd place’ yet he still rules, you are not going to vote your way out of this.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
i thought it said Australia voted for remigration. i was getting excited

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
WE just saw this take place in France

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
first

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Even though Austria voted, make no mistake about it, the Globohomo will circle the wagons and not allow them to lead, 30% verses the traitors.

@katana17
4 days ago
Transcript of last week’s show:

Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
o/

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
hello lads

@lewpers
4 days ago
Isn’t Atomwaffen all feds too? Pretty sure they were exposed during a court case, unless I’m wrong.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
bt?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Iran probably has advanced Russian anti air defenses which would make the Americans think twice

@lewpers
4 days ago
The importance of Iran’s strike is that it has now showed the world that Israel is far from invincible, and without the JEWSA it’d fall overnight.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
that was a good stream with the Israeli sperg

DanTheOracle
4 days ago

@WhiteWalker
hitler tried to not vote his way out of this… he completely failed before quite literally voting his way out of this… change my mind?

Hide replies
DOLO
4 days ago
You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked to begin with. The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star, and i can see that being the case, but don’t forget that the officials were largely on his side as well. Famously the judge at his trial actually sympathized with Hitler, but obviously that wouldn’t happen now.
Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
4 days ago
“You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked”
ok lets argue it…
how many people took power in 1923 vs 1833?
how many people died in 1923 vs 1933 to take power? like, what is the percentage? the ratio between power taken to the loss of your own supporters?
how much more power did the commies get in 1923 vs 1933 because of the putsch?
when were more volumes of mein kampf put into peoples hands? 1923 or a decade later in 1933?
what single positive thing came about because of 1923? you quite literally cant even name one can you?
Less

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
“The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star”
is degrelle here to debate with? because i would be more than happy to debate him on this… but i think ultimately the thing that made hitler a “rock star” wasnt the putsch, it was his unscheduled speech before the DAP long before it even became the NSDAP…. he was sent there by the german government to “spy”on political parties to ensure they werent commies, after a commie gave a speech as to why they should become more marist to the workers, hitler was so incensed he got up to leave in disgust and gave a 15 minute “off the cuff” unscripted speech on how wrong marxists were…. the head of the DAP didnt just want hitler to join his “beer hall” party… but signed the party over to hitler on the spot….
you think that hitler just voting in the beer halls of the time had more or less of an outcome than his speech that won him the whole party?
how many people died in the putsch vs his beer hall speech? what, ultimately won hitler more power? losing members in the putsch? or winning over a whole party without losing even a single member and taking power in the party? im pretty confident i know which was more important.
“Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.”
yea the idea wasnt to agree with me… it wasnt even just to argue with me… it was to change my mind that sitting at home in your basement doing nothing is somehow better than simply voting.. simply voting isnt going to replace them… you need to take as much power anywhere you can while voting is the only thing that will work…
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
is degrelle here to debate with?
He doesn’t need to be, he wrote several books, why don’t you read them and stop sperging out, faggot.

0
1
Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
loooooool fucking owned.
youre the one who was trying to form an argument for it… i simply called you out on your retarded bullshit… i dont need nor want to make your argument for you, youre ment to have the IQ to do that yourself, you completely failed.
nigger level intelligence…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago(edited)
The city of Munich had been stirred to intense feelings for Hitler after the failure of the putsch. There had been not the least sign of solidarity with Kahr and Lossow and their people. In powerless rage, they had pounced on the movement that had made them tremble. Its offices had been closed, the Vélkischer Beobachter banned and all its assets seized. But the harder they hit, the more indignation they aroused. “For some days,” writes Benoist-Méchin, “the people, prey to a strange agitation, have been roaming the streets singing patriotic songs and booing von Kahr.”
“The streets of the city,” adds historian Pierre Soisson, “resounded with enthusiastic cries of Deutschland Erwache (‘Germany Awake’] and ‘Heil Hitler’.” On the day after Hitler’s imprisonment, a referendum was organized at the university. Reproducing the official report of this opinion poll will tell it best: “Meeting at the university: 70 percent for Hitler, 20 percent von Kahr, 10 percent indifferent.
Less

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
wheres degalle so i can answer him and his point? can ya run and grab him for a moment? i would love to explain to him how wrong he is and why exactly hes wrong…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Now you’re making yourself look like an idot. Look up who Léon Degrelle is before making a comment like that.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
lool its hilarious. only a midwit cant work out im using the absurdity to point out your stupidity…
you really think someone like me does not know about degrelles work, life and arguments for and against his positions?
the fact is im so used to easily winning these little debates and you midwit always end up going “oh yea? well read this thing i read and that will tell you why youre wrong” but in reality i can explain to you why your interpretation of their views
and opinions are wrong and do it in my own words without having to rely on a midwit like you not reading someone elses work to see my point….
but i guess being so new to this you have not worked out how it works or your own views
rather than just parrot someone elses….
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Literally nobody is debating. It’s just you sperging out. There is a difference.

0
1
Continue Thread
WaffleStake
4 days ago
Drew Pavlou is a Gunt Guard for Zionism

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
That national guard if I understand correctly is actually from the disaster area, it’s disgusting.

@KeepAskingForTruth
4 days ago
$3.88
From my dead body my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.

Tendie Research Room
4 days ago
are they late?

0
0

===================

RUMBLE COMMENTS (41) as of Oct 8, 2024.

Dan762
4 days ago
we need yall in America or we need to colab
10 likes

autonomousthought
4 days ago
The argument about Africans not trading their minerals to us is wrong. In a natural state whites could dominate the world through trade alone. Africans would absolutely trade their minerals to us, and for what would be something of miniscule value to whites, just like when we traded with Native Americans. They’d be living in even more squalor than they are now. Keith wasn’t pleading with brown people arguing that we’re nice and can get along. He made a basic argument for self determination of different peoples. Counter signaling that is really weird and dumb
8 likes

› Show 5 replies
WhiteBloke
4 days ago
Rumble is pumping more ads on the replay that fkn jewtube. Unreal.
8 likes

› Show 1 reply
katana17
4 days ago
Last week’s transcript: [Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/28/joel-davis-building-nationalism-from-the-ground-up-sep-26-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: The show has expanded its audience significantly by broadcasting on Twitter. They’ve grown their audience despite being deplatformed from YouTube. They talk about the upcoming Australian Football League grand final weekend, and critique the commercialization and politicization of Australian football, while discussing the potential for politicizing sports for nationalist causes. They discuss the concept of building nationalism from the ground up, and argue that existing institutions have failed and a new movement needs to be built from scratch. Emphasize the importance of organizing white men around a “no compromise white nationalism.” Discuss strategies for building a parallel economy and community for their activists and the need for physical spaces and property for the movement. The challenges of fundraising and managing finances for their organization and the importance of transparency and accountability in handling donations. They critique excessive moralizing and ideological debates within the nationalist movement, and argue for a focus on racial identity as the foundation for their movement, despite the challenges of uniting different factions within white nationalism. National Socialism and its relevance today and strategies for normalizing their ideology and breaking the “spell” of anti-Nazi sentiment. The importance of building a distinctly Australian form of nationalism. The need for white people to collectively fund pro-white organizations and the potential for creating nationalist labor unions. The challenges of digital currencies and financial deplatforming. And more, …
4 likes

Delete
Motion937
3 days ago
I disagree somewhat with Joel when he mentioned Trump supporters in the USA who are rural vs. city dwellers…with city dwellers being more concerned about immigration. I am in a more rural area & am hard core anti-immigration. We are less soft on immigration. In the cities people are actually too tolerant of it. To the point that they are less likely to say anything because of persecution. It puts a target on your back by people who hate you. So people keep quiet about it. The whole thing is complicated. Very much like having friend groups, where the viewpoint changes depending on the quality of people you are associating with. Which is why a larger movement has to grow here so we are not in our little boxes. It needs to become the standard position for all our neighbors as well. I appreciate what you guys are doing, & I follow your channel from here in the USA.
2 likes

IvarHalfdansson
3 days ago
why are they always drinking milk?? weird
1 like

‹ Hide 3 replies
Motion937
2 days ago
Because being healthy & strong is better than being weak. Wanting to be weak is weird.
2 likes

PansophicGothi
2 days ago
It does seem kind of forced lol. Also it’s just the Aryans drinking milk meme from 2016. HWNDU
2 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
because it’s good
1 like

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
Joel is absolutely correct. Croats who feel for Croatia should come home as to be Australian one must be Anglo Celtic. You Dinaric Croats have to come home to Croatia. We need you and it is the best way to say thank you to the Aussies for giving us shelter post WWII. Do it. I did it. Only from our homelands can we truly network and create lasting alliances.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
It would be nice to have you debate or have a conversation with people in the USA like Ben Shapiro to help people gain perspective that they are deprived of. Ben doesn’t have a problem with the USA being subverted with racial demographics & thinks ideology is all that matters. I disagree & align with your way of thinking far more. It would be nice to see you talk with him to help wake people up in the USA as to how cucked we have become. I don’t see that happening because as the Jews have already said before they began their subversion tactics, “Never again.” Well, I would like to get to the point where White Anglo Saxons finally say, “Never again.” Then enforce it with a zero tolerance policy.
1 like

Rockwell1488Pierce
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)!!! https://x.com/joeldavisx https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell https://x.com/b_cottrell89
0 likes

Alimac801
3 days ago
I was a member of the Australian Libertarian Party. I know them well,attended many fundraisers:Ross Cameron and John Ruddick are total zionists and want to engage jewish money.
0 likes

katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript: [Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/10/04/joel-davis-political-existentialism-zionist-hypocrisy-austrians-vote-for-remigration-oct-3-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments. Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel. Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.” Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews. Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.” Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters. They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts. Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.” Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints. Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform. Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe. Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia. Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia. Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities. Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia. Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism. More, …
0 likes

Delete
PansophicGothi
2 days ago
Saying that we’re going to dominate the globe and take whatever we want from everyone is not just bad optics, it’s a non-starter. You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that. It’s an edgelord position at this point. As someone else said, we can get whatever we want through trade, and cheaply. Besides that nothing is really exclusive that white people don’t have access to already, if we want to develop it. We only go to other countries now for slave labor and/or resource exploiting without any environmental concerns. Not only are neither of those Aryan principles, they’re ultimately horrible no matter where we cause it to happen on the globe and will come back to bite us.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
StreamAddict
1 day ago
“You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that.” Yeah because we’re still brainwashed retards, we’re trying to reverse that, obviously. If we actually had white nationalists in power it would be just standard procedure. Of course we just take what we need, within reason, not just go out of our way to create conflict, but if a bunch of africans or something are sitting on shit we need and theyre not cooperating then one way or the other theyre getting out of the way. We dont owe any more fair treatment than the nons would give us so its a reasonable take, just seems crazy now cuz we’re in this ridiculous situation.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PansophicGothi
1 day ago
No one on Earth is ever not going to trade with Whites, that’s a strawman argument. Especially poor brown people, who will be desperate for anything we trade to them and have no use for the things we want. There is no reason for us to go around subjugating everyone else, it’s a net resource drain and also always comes back to bite us later . Wall off their brown nations and leave them there.
0 likes

FJB6666
1 day ago
Which country is taking in all these religion of peace morons????? Australia, we are the pathetic dumping ground for low IQ, allah snackbars. F labor traitors for now endangering Australians security.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
read Mario Palmieri available on Amazon and free pdf online. totally great.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
thanks guys. so many others are pretending to be natty because of elections and it’s really enervating. Hey yo y’all ya hear what Tim Pool and Candace Owens said yo? They get real spicy every four years for some reason. So sick of the coopting. I’d rather they be true lefties than fake nationalists.
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“A short time ago Mrs. Besant, in an interesting essay, announced that there was only one religion in the world, that all faiths were only versions or perversions of it, and that she was quite prepared to say what it was. According to Mrs. Besant this universal Church is simply the universal self. It is the doctrine that we are really all one person; that there are no real walls of individuality between man and man. If I may put it so, she does not tell us to love our neighbors; she tells us to be our neighbors. That is Mrs. Besant’s thoughtful and suggestive description of the religion in which all men must find themselves in agreement. And I never heard of any suggestion in my life with which I more violently disagree. I want to love my neighbor not because he is I, but precisely because he is not I. I want to adore the world, not as one likes a looking-glass, because it is one’s self, but as one loves a woman, because she is entirely different. If souls are separate love is possible. If souls are united love is obviously impossible. A man may be said loosely to love himself, but he can hardly fall in love with himself, or, if he does, it must be a monotonous courtship. If the world is full of real selves, they can be really unselfish selves. But upon Mrs. Besant’s principle the whole cosmos is only one enormously selfish person. It is just here that Buddhism is on the side of modern pantheism and immanence. And it is just here that Christianity is on the side of humanity and liberty and love. Love desires personality; therefore love desires division. It is the instinct of Christianity to be glad that God has broken the universe into little pieces, because they are living pieces. It is her instinct to say “little children love one another” rather than to tell one large person to love himself… (to be continued in next comment)
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the intellectual abyss between Buddhism and Christianity; that for the Buddhist or Theosophist personality is the fall of man, for the Christian it is the purpose of God, the whole point of his cosmic idea. *The world-soul of the Theosophists asks man to love it only in order that man may throw himself into it. But the divine centre of Christianity actually threw man out of it in order that he might love it. The oriental deity is like a giant who should have lost his leg or hand and be always seeking to find it; but the Christian power is like some giant who in a strange generosity should cut off his right hand, so that it might of its own accord shake hands with him.* We come back to the same tireless note touching the nature of Christianity; all modern philosophies are chains which connect and fetter; Christianity is a sword which separates and sets free. No other philosophy makes God actually rejoice in the separation of the universe into living souls. But according to orthodox Christianity this separation between God and man is sacred, because this is eternal. That a man may love God it is necessary that there should be not only a God to be loved, but a man to love him. All those vague theosophical minds for whom the universe is an immense melting-pot are exactly the minds which shrink instinctively from that earthquake saying of our Gospels, which declare that the Son of God came not with peace but with a sundering sword. The saying rings entirely true even considered as what it obviously is; the statement that any man who preaches real love is bound to beget hate. It is as true of democratic fraternity as a divine love; *sham love ends in compromise and common philosophy; but real love has always ended in bloodshed.*
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
Yet there is another and yet more awful truth behind the obvious meaning of this utterance of our Lord. According to Himself the Son was a sword separating brother and brother that they should for an aeon hate each other. But the Father also was a sword, which in the black beginning separated brother and brother, so that they should love each other at last. This is the meaning of that almost insane happiness in the eyes of the mediaeval saint in the picture. This is the meaning of the sealed eyes of the superb Buddhist image. The Christian saint is happy because he has verily been cut off from the world; he is separate from things and is staring at them in astonishment. But why should the Buddhist saint be astonished at things? — since there is really only one thing, and that being impersonal can hardly be astonished at itself. There have been many pantheist poems suggesting wonder, but no really successful ones. The pantheist cannot wonder, for he cannot praise God or praise anything as really distinct from himself. Our immediate business here, however, is with the effect of this Christian admiration (which strikes outwards, towards a deity distinct from the worshipper) upon the general need for ethical activity and social reform. And surely its effect is sufficiently obvious. There is no real possibility of getting out of pantheism, any special impulse to moral action. For pantheism implies in its nature that one thing is as good as another; whereas action implies in its nature that one thing is greatly preferable to another. Swinburne in the high summer of his scepticism tried in vain to wrestle with this difficulty. In “Songs before Sunrise,” written under the inspiration of Garibaldi and the revolt of Italy he proclaimed the newer religion and the purer God which should wither up all the priests of the world: ‘What doest thou now Looking Godward to cry I am I, thou art thou, I am low, thou art high, I am thou that thou seekest to find him, find thou but th
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“When the business man rebukes the idealism of his office-boy, it is commonly in some such speech as this: “Ah, yes, when one is young, one has these ideals in the abstract and these castles in the air; but in middle age they all break up like clouds, and one comes down to a belief in practical politics, to using the machinery one has and getting on with the world as it is.” Thus, at least, venerable and philanthropic old men now in their honoured graves used to talk to me when I was a boy. But since then I have grown up and have discovered that these philanthropic old men were telling lies. What has really happened is exactly the opposite of what they said would happen. They said that I should lose my ideals and begin to believe in the methods of practical politicians. Now, I have not lost my ideals in the least; my faith in fundamentals is exactly what it always was. What I have lost is my old childlike faith in practical politics. I am still as much concerned as ever about the Battle of Armageddon; but I am not so much concerned about the General Election. As a babe I leapt up on my mother’s knee at the mere mention of it. No; the vision is always solid and reliable. The vision is always a fact. It is the reality that is often a fraud. As much as I ever did, more than I ever did, I believe in Liberalism. But there was a rosy time of innocence when I believed in Liberals. . . .
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the first principle of democracy: that the essential things in men are the things they hold in common, not the things they hold separately. And the second principle is merely this: that the political instinct or desire is one of these things which they hold in common. Falling in love is more poetical than dropping into poetry. The democratic contention is that government (helping to rule the tribe) is a thing like falling in love, and not a thing like dropping into poetry. It is not something analogous to playing the church organ, painting on vellum, discovering the North Pole (that insidious habit), looping the loop, being Astronomer Royal, and so on. For these things we do not wish a man to do at all unless he does them well. It is, on the contrary, a thing analogous to writing one’s own love-letters or blowing one’s own nose. These things we want a man to do for himself, even if he does them badly. I am not here arguing the truth of any of these conceptions; I know that some moderns are asking to have their wives chosen by scientists, and they may soon be asking, for all I know, to have their noses blown by nurses. I merely say that mankind does recognize these universal human functions, and that democracy classes government among them. In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state. This is democracy; and in this I have always believed.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
But there is one thing that I have never from my youth up been able to understand. I have never been able to understand where people got the idea that democracy was in some way opposed to tradition. It is obvious that tradition is only democracy extended through time. It is trusting to a consensus of common human voices rather than to some isolated or arbitrary record. The man who quotes some German historian against the tradition of the Catholic Church, for instance, is strictly appealing to aristocracy. He is appealing to the superiority of one expert against the awful authority of a mob. It is quite easy to see why a legend is treated, and ought to be treated, more respectfully than a book of history. The legend is generally made by the majority of people in the village, who are sane. The book is generally written by the one man in the village who is mad. Those who urge against tradition that men in the past were ignorant may go and urge it at the Carlton Club, along with the statement that voters in the slums are ignorant. It will not do for us. If we attach great importance to the opinion of ordinary men in great unanimity when we are dealing with daily matters, there is no reason why we should disregard it when we are dealing with history or fable. Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of democracy and tradition; it seems evident to me that they are the same idea.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
The ancient Greeks voted by stones; these shall vote by tombstones. It is all quite regular and official, for most tombstones, like most ballot papers, are marked with a cross.
0 likes
vigilantejustice23
4 days ago
Blair has been annoying me lately, I’m glad he didn’t show up tbh
-2 likes

‹ Hide 6 replies
hadefo
4 days ago
make your own content then. lazy and pathetic
2 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
4 days ago
Why not be specific in your criticism. “Annoying” sounds like the Left when they call conservatives “weird”. What can one do with that info?
1 like

Seanybruv
3 days ago
Annoying you because he gets your brain ticking with interesting and unique perspectives and doesn’t just say what you expect/want someone to say? Honestly, complaining about someone active in the fight for whatever reason, especially something so trivial and subjective as being annoyed, is so feminine, soy, and low T.
1 like

Whatsthefrequencyken
3 days ago
Blair is quirky and somewhat mercurial. It’s not bad to have a stream with just the two grown-ups but I hope he’s back next week.
1 like

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
well I like Blair. I doubt he’s going anywhere. He’s been with the show for a long time.
0 likes

RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
Me too. But what are your reasons?
-4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
EnglandAwake
4 days ago
You sound like a bunch of Jews to be honest.
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Judge Napolitano: Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Wednesday, October second, 2024. Colonel Douglas Macgregor joins us now. Colonel, no matter what we’re about to discuss, it’s always a pleasure and a gift for me to be able to pick your brain.

 

So last week, President Zelensky came to the United States, visited an arms manufacturer in Scranton, Pennsylvania, gave a speech at the UN, made the rounds at Washington, went home empty handed. Prime Minister Netanyahu gave a very belligerent, belligerent, contemptuous speech to an empty General Assembly chamber, went to an office in the same building and ordered a murder 5,000 miles away, which took place. What do you see happening?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, as I understand it, that Zelensky did not go home completely empty handed, that some promises were made for more money and equipment.

 

Now, how much it was, I’ve heard various figures. I think we have to accept the fact that the war is obviously lost in Ukraine. I don’t think there are very many people who privately reject that notion, but they’re going to sustain the facade that there is a Ukrainian government of some significance in Kiev, at least until after the election. So he was treated accordingly.

 

I think the other issue is a much more serious one right now because everything strikes me in Washington as kind of being on Autopilot. We’re sort of flying as a nation in the direction of a major regional war in the Middle East. And we’re treating the Ukrainian disaster with the usual disinterest that arises when it becomes clear that you’ve lost. All of it is bad news for the American people. And what was even more striking to me than what you’ve mentioned is that last night the word “Ukraine” did not even come up for discussion. I had hoped that perhaps future Vice president Vance would have at least asked about Ukraine and what had happened to the hundreds of billions of dollars and many millions of tons of equipment and ammunition that had been shipped over there. But it never came up.

 

Judge Napolitano: How dangerous was the Israeli assassination of Nasrallah using 160,000 pounds of bombs to kill one person and a dozen or so people around him?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: I think we need to understand that it could not have happened at all without us. We have considerable ISR assets, air force and army navy engaged in supporting the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and its attacks on Lebanon.

 

So I think that’s the first thing. We have the capability to harvest very sensitive information, voice and otherwise, that the Israelis simply don’t have. And then we can lase these targets, providing very exact data to the Israelis, which we did.

 

So I think we have to understand that when you see these kinds of successful operations take place, it’s not an “Israel only” operation by any means. Was it dangerous to do this? Not from the standpoint of Mr Netanyahu.

 

And I think we need to understand something that clearly is not understood in Tehran. I don’t think it’s understood in Moscow. And that is that Mr Netanyahu is waging a ruthless war of extermination against his enemies. He’s already told us who they are the people in Gaza, the Arabs on the West Bank, and the Arabs south of the Latani river who are part of Hezbollah.

 

And in the meantime, he’s also struck a number of very lucrative targets across Syria.

 

So this is a very powerful war that’s underway, and we’re on Autopilot. We’re just flying in the direction. We’re helping it, we’re enabling it, we’re pushing it. And I’m sure you’ve seen the interview with, I think it’s Colonel Jacques Baud who talks about the fact that we have been encouraging this behavior from the beginning. And I think we have, and we are!

 

So the American people aren’t being consulted and there’s really no debate about it because everyone in Washington is quite comfortable with what’s happening.

 

Judge Napolitano: Did the White House encourage the Israeli government to invade southern Lebanon?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: It would appear that they have. That seems to that seems to be widespread consensus. Nothing is happening that Washington has not wanted to happen. And that makes perfect sense, judge for the reasons I just outlined. We control all the resources and we have access to and dispose over very considerable sensitive technologies.

 

So if we don’t want something to happen, it’s not going to happen! And anything that does happen happens because we’ve allowed it.

 

Judge Napolitano: But by what constitutional or moral standard do we wage war against Hezbollah? We haven’t a declared war on Hezbollah, it poses no threat whatsoever to the United States. We don’t have a treaty of alliance with Israel. I’m wearing my constitutional scholar hat.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, we’re in a strange set of relations with Israel that are analogous to some extent to FDR’s relations with the British Empire and the Soviet Union before World War Two. Very few people are aware that FDR dispatched Harry Hopkins to Moscow in July of 1941 to offer Stalin virtually anything he wanted and anything he needed. And we, of course, were not at war with Germany. The bombing at Pearl Harbor had not yet happened. We had a war ongoing for almost two and a half years, trying to provoke the Germans into attacking our warships when we actively aided the British and Canadian navies in moving supplies to Great Britain.

 

So this is a similar set of circumstances. And I think it also has potentially very grave consequences for us. But as you point out, none of this is constitutional. But very little of what FDR did was constitutional.

 

So I don’t think anyone is remotely interested in discussing constitutional law at the moment.

 

[07:28]

 

Judge Napolitano: Well, what will the consequences to us be? Will it be Russia coming to the aid of Iran? Will it be American boys coming home in body bags?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, I think we have to reckon with some losses in the Middle East. I don’t see how we avoid them. We know that we’ve had losses in Ukraine. It’s simply being decided not to report those publicly and to dismiss the allegation that Americans have been killed in Ukraine by finding cover stories for them, dying in other settings, other places, particularly in the United States.

 

I think things in the Middle East will be different. It’ll be harder to provide those cover stories, harder to conceal. And the reason is very simple. This ruthless war of extermination is going to be confronted soon by overwhelming deadly force, provided first and foremost by Iran, also augmented and extended by Russia, and I would argue, eventually the rest of the Islamic world.

 

But we’ve always said this, and you judge, have had these discussions with others on your show. No one in the region wants a war with Israel and the United States. The only people that are interested in a war in the region consist of Israel and primarily us. That’s it! No one else really wants a war.

 

And this has now attracted the attention of everyone in the Islamic world. We’ve been listening to lots of harumps and harumps and threats, most of which have gone nowhere from Turkey.

 

But that is changing now. And the Turks are making it very clear that the catastrophic destruction of Lebanon is not something they’re going to stand by and tolerate. They’ve got three or 4 million refugees on their territory at the moment. They can’t take any more. A million people have left Lebanon. More than 7,000 people in Lebanon have been killed. And these are hardly Hezbollah fighters. All of this is coming together. We’re seeing action in Iraq, action in Syria, action in Yemen and Egypt and Jordan continue to reach a boiling point. Precisely when that will boil over and change the governments is anyone’s guess, but I think that’s inevitable.

 

So we’re on the march to a regional war that always has the potential to go global. The Russians are well prepared to fight now. They’re stronger militarily than they have been in 30 years. And the same thing is true, unfortunately, with China. The Chinese don’t want any sort of confrontation and they’re undoubtedly sweating bullets over the Straits of Hormuz. But the Israelis are determined to hit those Iranian oil facilities and I think we’re going to see that once that occurs, it will bring in the rest of the actors who are actively opposed to Israel.

 

Judge Napolitano: Tell me about Jordan. The population of Jordan cannot be in sync with the King. The King used the Jordanian military to help Israel defend itself the other night. When? I guess it was last night when, last night Israel time when Iran sent 200 missiles there. I’ll ask you about the missiles in a minute. But is the King of Jordan on thin ice because of the overwhelming, nearly unanimous view of the public over which he claims to reign, that Israel is the enemy?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Yes. Well, remember, the majority of the people serving in the Jordanian army tend to be Bedouin in origin. In other words, people from Bedouin origins, much like the King himself. But he’s got 11.2 million Palestinians living in Jordan, and they are very anxious to help their brothers on the West Bank and in Gaza. So they’re fuming.

 

When does this change? I know that the Iranians undoubtedly have agents on the ground in Jordan, probably pushing levers there in the hopes that the Jordanians will rise up, push the government out of business and take the reins of power themselves. I’d be very surprised if that was not also the case in Egypt.

 

In both cases, however, both sovereign leaders are entirely dependent upon the military. And as long as the military does not take them into custody, remove them, assassinate them, they will stay. The question is, where does the military stand at this point? I know from firsthand discussions, people just returning from Egypt, that the Egyptian military is ashamed of themselves and embarrassed that they are doing nothing against Israel. I suspect you have a similar attitude in Jordan,

 

Judge Napolitano: Chris, do we have the clip? It’s not on today’s list. But you still have the clip of King Abdullah of Jordan addressing the United Nations? He’ll look for that, colonel, and then I’ll ask you what you think of it. He was harshly critical, harshly critical of Israel at the UN, and then he used his military to defend Israel when the Iranians attacked.

 

What happened the other night? What type of weaponry was hurled by Iran at Israel, what got through and what damage was done, as far as you are able to understand, just, 24 hours later?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Right. Well, most of the weapon systems were medium range ballistic missiles, as I understand it. These are not hypersonic, most of them. How many of them ultimately penetrated or simply attracted attention from the air defense systems, the Arrow 2 or the Iron Dome or our own Patriot systems, I don’t know. But I do know that some number and I don’t know how many hypersonic missiles were used, and they all penetrated the air and missile defense system. No question about it.

 

Judge Napolitano: Did they reach, I don’t remember the name of its a major Israeli air base in the middle of the desert. It’s the place from which the jets that bombed and killed Nasrallah came into which they returned. Did the Iranian missiles reach that military base and do any damage there?

 

[14:09]

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, they reached the base. I think it’s Hatzerim Air Base. At the same time, there were claims made that some F35s were damaged or destroyed along with some F16s. We have no way of confirming that, and that also seems unlikely. I imagine the Israelis probably launched most of those aircraft in order to ensure they were not on the ground when the missile attack started.

 

And remember, the Iranians signaled the United States and virtually everybody else when they were going to launch. This was another attempt to demonstrate, I think, Iran’s precision strike capability in a way that would awaken some concern in Washington and Jerusalem. It hasn’t!

 

In other words, this was another, if you will excuse the expression, a “wasted opportunity” on the Iranian side.

 

And I think they’re going to be hit very, very hard by the Israelis in response. The Israelis do not believe in symmetrical warfare. Everything they do is inevitably asymmetrical. In other words, if you want to kill the flea, you use a jackhammer, you don’t use a fly swatter.

 

And so I think Putin and Najee [sp] have been advising the Iranian leadership to embrace restraint on the assumption that if they restrain themselves, a war can be avoided and negotiations will take place and can sort things out. I don’t see any evidence for that.

 

I mean, Israel has failed thus far to achieve its objectives in Gaza. It’s also failing in its objectives against Hezbollah, although that has now just started on the ground. How serious it is, I don’t know.

 

And then they have not achieved their objective in Iran, which is to destroy that regime and remove Iran as a great power in the region, period. So those things are unachieved.

 

And I think there is no evidence that there’s any willingness under any circumstances in Jerusalem or Washington to contemplate any sort of talks or negotiations over anything until those objectives are secured.

 

Judge Napolitano: The two principal American diplomats slash bureaucrats negotiating or dealing with the Israeli government on a day to day, hour by hour basis for the United States, Brett McGurk and Amos Hochstein are bellicose and in favor of war. Are they not?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: That seems pretty clear. I don’t see any evidence to the contrary. So they’re not representing the supposed interest that exists, if it exists at all, inside the Beltway in Washington for a negotiated outcome.

 

On the contrary, they are completely aligned with what I just described.

 

Judge Napolitano: Right.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: So I think the Iranians have wasted time, money and resources. They should prepare for an all out assault which is coming. The same thing is true for Hezbollah.

 

So the time for restraint as far as they are concerned, I think, is over. But they’ll have to figure that out on their own.

 

Judge Napolitano: We’re going to play the clip from the King of Jordan. You tell me if this is sincere or if this is consistent with the behavior of his military the other night. Chris, while we’re playing this, can you find the comment? It may be here, and I just don’t see it by President Biden yesterday saying that whatever the Iranians did was defeated and ineffective.

 

But in the meantime, here’s the King of Jordan at the United Nations last week.

 

King Abdullah: In the absence of global accountability, repeated horrors are normalized, threatening to create a future where anything is permitted, anywhere in the world. Those who continue to propagate the idea of Jordan as an alternative homeland.

So let me be very, very clear. That will never happen! We will never accept the forced displacement of Palestinians, which is a war crime. For years, the Arab world has extended a hand to Israel through the Arab Peace Initiative, offering full recognition and normalization in exchange for peace. But consecutive Israeli governments, emboldened by years of impunity, have rejected peace and chosen confrontation instead.

 

Judge Napolitano: Trying to accomplish by speaking out of one side of his mouth and shooting weapons out of the other side, if you’ll pardon the awkward analogy.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, he sounds like the man who beats his wife periodically and then is subsequently remorseful and says:

 

“I will never beat my wife again!”

 

And then proceeds to go back and beat her. This is eloquent but irrelevant! Unless he, General Sisi in Egypt, take the reins and assert themselves against Israel in some fashion, everything he described happening will happen.

 

In other words, he will watch as millions of Arabs are driven out or killed from Gaza and ultimately the West Bank. If nothing is done, then the same thing will eventually happen to Hezbollah unless Iran intervenes to come to its assistance.

 

And you have to know that behind the scenes, the Arabs in Jordan and in Egypt are talking privately with the Turks and saying:

 

“You know, historically we live in your sphere of influence, yet you are all talk and no action. Why do you expect us to impale ourselves on Israel if you are unwilling to do anything?”

 

Remember, Iran is a Shiite power. The Persia, the Persian Iran that we talk about is an outsider in that area. They don’t view the Iranians as natural leaders inside the Islamic world. But the truth is, thus far, it’s the Shiites who’ve been leading and the Sunnis who have done almost nothing. It’s a very strange set of circumstances.

 

Judge Napolitano: Here is President Biden yesterday afternoon. Tell me if you agree with him Colonel.

 

Biden: I’ll say a few words about Iran’s missile attack on Israel today. At my direction, the United States military actively supported the defense of Israel, and we’re still assessing the impact. But based on what we know now, the attack appears to have been defeated and ineffective. And this is testament to Israeli military capability and the US military. It is also a testament to intensive planning between the United States and in Israel to anticipate and defend against the brazen attack we expected.

 

[21:26]

 

Judge Napolitano: Defeated and ineffective?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, certainly it was not defeated per se, because it was not designed to kill large numbers of people, but at the same time, it turned out to be ineffective. I think that’s arguably true. Strategically, I’m sure the Israelis breathed a huge sigh of relief. You’re talking about the capability to launch 100 missiles an hour for 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours with deadly accuracy. That hasn’t happened.

 

Judge Napolitano: Is Iran’s capability?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Yes! And that has not happened.

 

And as long as that does not happen, I think the Israelis are going to take advantage of the opportunity. They’d be fools not to. And they’re going to go after Iran with a vengeance.

 

There’s a struggle inside Iran right now between the new regime, which is actually moderate in its outlook, and wants to align itself with what we consider to be normalcy in the world and normalcy in the region. People in Iran who are on the other side of that argument, the so-called hardliners, they’re saying:

 

“You’re fools! You’ve lost your minds!”

 

Judge Napolitano: That would be the Ayatollah and his crew.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, I would think. So but I don’t want to name names that imputes things to people without knowing precisely who they are. But the bottom line is, …

 

Judge Napolitano: Understood. Understood.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Bottom line is they very definitely are standing around and they’re saying:

 

“What are you crazy? The Israelis and the Americans are coming for you. They are going to destroy you! Why are you holding back?”

 

Judge Napolitano: Why are you holding back? What is President Putin doing while this is happening? Is he talking to the new president of Iran, saying, “be restrained”? Or “how can I help?”.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: There is some evidence that the former chief of defense, Defense Minister, if you will, Shoigu may well be on the ground in Iran, along with the current Russian prime minister and thousands of Russian technicians and military advisors, trying to put together and maintain this elaborate air and missile defense network. Along with probably other weapons systems that have been provided.

 

So I think the Russians are there and they’ve told the Iranians:

 

“We will stand by you.”

 

But at the same time, I think Putin has always been predisposed to advise caution and restraint.

 

Now, that’s actually worked thus far very well, I would argue, in Ukraine. It is Ukraine that is dying! It is Ukraine that has bled to death! It’s the American military establishment and its equipment that has failed miserably to successfully halt any Russian advance.

 

But the situation in the Middle East is quite different. So giving that advice is probably not necessarily the Right advice at this point.

 

At the same time, you have Xi in China. He does not want the Straits of Hormuz to be closed, and he’s worried about the destruction of the oil facilities in Iran and access to those straits. I mean, why would the Israelis allow business as usual through the Persian Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz if they’re at war with Iran? I think it’s pretty clear that they’re not going to hold back.

 

And that’s why I’m saying that that battle in Tehran is being fought out as we speak. And I don’t know what the outcome will be, but I think ultimately the hardliners are going to win!

 

Judge Napolitano: What has Netanyahu, who it is obvious now, never wanted peace, exploited October 7 well beyond its initial meaning as an instrument with which to expand the borders of Israel well beyond, never mind 1967, but where it is today? What has he done to Israel by this belligerence to the country that he leads?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, the Israeli economy is in ruins. There’s no question about that. It’ll take a long time to recover from all of this. That’s not terribly important as long as they swim in a sea of American cash.

 

If you look at the credit ratings in Israel, Israel’s credit rating is tied to ours. We essentially underwrite Israeli economic strength, power and stability. We underwrite their currency. We underwrite everything! So as long as this continues, I think the Israeli population is certainly 80 plus percent behind what Mr Netanyahu is doing. I don’t think that is a reflection of whether they like him or not. That’s another matter entirely.

 

But I think what he’s doing is something they strongly support. They want to rid themselves of the quote, unquote “Arab problem”, the Palestinian Arab problem. They want to get rid of it. They want to rid themselves of the quote, unquote “Hezbollah problem”.

 

Now, we could sit here, we can go back into the past, and we can debate how it got this way and how the Israelis shot themselves in the foot several times, cultivated the emergence of their own enemies. It doesn’t make any difference. This is what they want to do.

 

And remember that if you can move into Lebanon, where they’re headed now, you also exert considerable control over the water table and water resources. Water resources in that region of the world are as important as gold, and that would put them in a very strong position. The deeper they go into Lebanon, and ultimately their operations in Syria are the same.

 

Again, this is why ultimately, and I say this, ultimately, when all is said and done, we will watch Turks enter this conflict. The Turks will not sit there and do nothing in perpetuity! And we will see Jordan and Egypt explode! It’s coming, but it’s coming very slowly.

 

[27:39]

 

Judge Napolitano: Will the Turks turn off the spigot of oil, much of which goes to Israel, or are they more interested in the commercial desirability of continuing to sell oil, even to a country that’s adverse to theirs?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: The destruction of Lebanon, which is ongoing, is pushing them in the direction of shutting it down, finally. And the pressure inside Turkey on President Erdogan and his regime, which is accused of all sorts of corruption problems right now, is enormous. I think he’s going to be pushed into these actions whether he likes it or not.

 

And again, this is the street, if you will, the popular attitude in the Arab, Turkish, Persian world:

 

“What are we going to do?”

 

I mean, I’m sure you saw President Netanyahu talk about the Israelis liberating Iran from their oppressive government. Yes, of course, that drew a lot of laughter inside Iran, because the Iranians said:

 

“We may not like this government, but if you think we’re going to align ourselves with the jews in Israel against our own government, against our own country, you’ve lost your mind!”

 

Judge Napolitano: One wonders what that comment that he made was aimed at. Maybe it was Iranian expats living in the United States? But let me switch gears before we end.

 

The killing of Nazarallah, a cultural icon, a religious leader, a cult leader, if you will. But is it very significant militarily that he’s now dead?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: I think it’s significant militarily only insofar as it stiffens the resolve and the willingness to fight inside Hezbollah. Remember, his predecessor was also assassinated. The problem with all of these assassinations is that they do not fundamentally change anything! They tend, on the whole, to inspire those who don’t want to negotiate in any case. It tends to discredit anybody who argues for moderation.

 

It makes people in Israel and in the United States feel good because they’ve been able to find someone they don’t like who is opposed to them and kill them.

 

It also opens up another can of worms, which is what could happen to us and what could happen inside Israel. No one is immune to this sort of thing. When you start this assassination program, there’s always a danger that it becomes a tit for tat operation.

 

But it doesn’t change anything strategically, because ultimately all of these people are replaced. I mean, somebody said to me the other day, what happens when you remove the CEO from General Electric or Chrysler or any of the big automobile organizations, Ford or something else? Well, you replace them! Somebody else comes in and takes over. So you don’t fundamentally change anything. But you do anger, and you do inspire people to fight back!

 

Judge Napolitano: And in this case, the replacement might be more strident than the person that was assassinated.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well we remember we killed Soleimani, General Soleimani, and we don’t need to go back over that. I thought that was a misguided act at the time and thought it was also, as you would point out, unconstitutional because we don’t assassinate the members of other people’s governments. Well, all of that went by the wayside. Has his force been any less effective? I don’t see much evidence for that. Is Iran or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps any more willing to do business with us? Of course not! So killing him changed fundamentally nothing!

 

Judge Napolitano: Colonel, thank you very much for your time, my dear friend.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: There’s one last thing I’d like to say that people need to keep in mind. There are many ways to define genius. Both Goethe and Einstein said:

 

“Genius consists of knowing when to stop!”

 

The truth is that the Israelis are on the edge of the abyss, and we are with them, encouraging them to jump off the cliff and into the abyss. However good they may think things look at the moment, whatever advantage they think they’ve achieved is temporary. And over time, the massive enormity of opposition to them in the region is only going to metastasize and grow. So knowing when to stop is genius. I keep looking for it in Washington, in Kiev, and in Jerusalem. I can’t find it.

 

Judge Napolitano: It doesn’t exist. You’re certainly not going to find it in Netanyahu. We know that, Colonel. Thank you. Thanks for your time. This is the largest audience you’ve drawn of the many huge live audiences that you’ve drawn on this platform. I’m deeply grateful. We all are for your time and for your analytical skills. All the best, colonel. I hope we can see you again next week.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Sure. Thank you, Judge.

 

Judge Napolitano: Of course. A great man and a very, very insightful series of operations about both Ukraine and the Middle East. Coming up at twelve noon today, live from Ukraine, Patrick Lancaster at 1:30, Aaron Mate. At 2:30, Phil Giraldi. Judge Napolitano for Judging Freedom.

 

[33:45]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/3/2024 = 2,013 (some shown))

@rezakarampour6286
8 hours ago
US Needs a declaration of independence from Israel .
1.3K

96 replies

@mrunderhill3970
7 hours ago
Never allow dual citizens in office if we ever have a choice again
749

29 replies

@oliveoil5789
7 hours ago

30

@Stonesour1
7 hours ago
Amen
23

@lilyBeans-cz4rm
6 hours ago
Canada likewise
19

@ji8698
6 hours ago
But no other dual citizen can do what they are doing and get away with it
20

@ziegle9876
6 hours ago
Making Garfield President sealed the deal…
2

@johnringoo756
6 hours ago
Should be law
14

@4570Govt
6 hours ago
We nose who you mean
9

@adinahaun6001
6 hours ago
Agreed!
1

@mohamedalsalmi6656
5 hours ago
In companies is considered conflict of interest and a person could get fired for it.
7

@Hellvine
5 hours ago
As a US Marine and dual citizen of Mexico, I agree.
14

@Howardlifts
5 hours ago
Huge issue
5

@briandam8126
5 hours ago

2

@thunderd78
5 hours ago
Never allow “gods chosen” in office.
19

@totallynotthefeds
5 hours ago
​ @4570Govt
1

@jacobjorgenson9285
5 hours ago
You won’t have a choice
2

@georgestavri4474
4 hours ago
@jacobjorgenson9285 Why ?

@lcollins4313
4 hours ago
President’s couldn’t be “ duel citizens. The Constitution said “must be a 2nd generation of two American citizens. Our Founding Fathers Specifically wanted the Republic to be safe from tyranny from all European influences. Loyalty to the New Republic. A Nation represented by the people, for the people . Indecent of outside Oligarchs.
3

@censorshipagainstthemiddle6198
4 hours ago
Wjen will yall accept that y’all have no say so in that matter.
1

@whitetigress4543
4 hours ago
You need to vote third party because these two are owned by AIPAC
5

@ellenrichardson7819
3 hours ago
Dual citizenship never allowed when some became US citizen until Israel & the Lobby.
2

@majorintel9623
2 hours ago
No dual citizens in any National Security, legal, or law enforcement role.
4

@HeavyMental1000
2 hours ago
I’m actually surprised that we allow this

@icemaxwell2000
2 hours ago
To all mothers in US prepare to give your children away to the new war in the middle east. The never-ending conflict that young American lives that need to be sacrificed for people that live at the other side of the world. Incredible…
3

@Davidnumber23
1 hour ago
the most stupid move that everyday people dont even realize its illegal elsewhere lol
2

@peppersghosttheater
1 hour ago
There will always be a special rule for Israel regardless of anything they decide in the future
3

@brutus4013
1 hour ago
Australia doesn’t allow dual citizens to hold elected offices. Well done my Aussie friends .
2

@Queef_latina
1 hour ago
It’s too late. They are everywhere
2

@Inafadal
1 hour ago
Do we have America any one who don’t have dual citizenship including Biden who Ireland citizens trump Germany Obama Kenya

@Freedom_Half_Off
57 minutes ago
​ @Inafadal Dual citizen is not just random reference to heritage or ancestry . dual citizens can actually carry the passport of the other nation … It has nothing to do with Grandpa came from country X
2

@AlexaTaganrog
6 hours ago
Free USA from Israel!
188

@flesz_
7 hours ago
Free USA from AIPAC
428

3 replies

@JeeeeeZ289
3 hours ago
And the owners of the federal reserve
10

@melaniestafford182
2 hours ago
Free the world from AIPAC
11

@gene8675
2 hours ago
Yes, & don’t sleep on cair the Arab version
1

@selma5885
7 hours ago
As an American, a tax payer, and a grandmother, I am deeply depressed and discouraged the direction our country has taken. Backing a campaign of extermination by Israel. God help us.
625

20 replies

@KizzieWiz
5 hours ago
I truly wish Doug Macgregor was standing for President of America!
81

3 replies

@johnsammers
7 hours ago
Does anyone else think that Iran was demonstrating they could have flattened Tel Aviv if they wanted to?
546

40 replies

@michaelidarecis
7 hours ago
Iran, Lebanon and Palestine has the right to defend themselves
614

25 replies

@63saruman
7 hours ago
Isn’t it time for all the members of Congress who stood up to clap to Netanyahu to go to the frontline?
931

29 replies

@mohammaddoofesh4963
6 hours ago
The US and Israel are solid partners, and should be held accountable jointly.
80

9 replies

@Kidbako1
6 hours ago
Not voting for anyone who looks favorable on Israel.
22

1 reply

@jaysteven8135
7 hours ago
Free America from Israel
147

@polybius666
7 hours ago
Free America and Palestine (From israel)
225

3 replies

@thaile100
7 hours ago
The Noble Persians, they’ve got Class! They don’t hit recklessly at civilians and civilian property. Unlike the coward Natenyahu!
350

14 replies

@EduardoArtistaDelavega
4 hours ago
Instead of arming Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc.
27

3 replies

@kirikoo9981
7 hours ago
How a Jordanian speaks such perfect English. This guy is an American planted there by the British and the Americans to defend Israel.
74

5 replies

@deansawich6250
7 hours ago
Thanks. Biden has to read a script, what a joke.
43

2 replies

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
I can’t stomach that traitor King Hussein
30

@nomayor1
4 hours ago
140,000 people across the globe turned to you within just four hours to get a picture of what is happening. Thank you Judge and thank you Col. MacGregor l.
33

@nejlababali7901
5 hours ago
Israel is also occupying America
40

2 replies

@gabrielkourieh5920
8 hours ago
The Israelis better not retaliate against Iran because they will regret it very badly,it looks like iran ran out of patience and it is ready to go all the way.that is bad news for Israel.
128

8 replies

@mdob5724
7 hours ago
If we had 100 million American voters watching and liking this channel would I have any hope for our future.
108

3 replies

@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors
5 hours ago
Iran, Lebanon, Palestine have the absolute right to defend itself!
6

@Mary-f1k8t
7 hours ago (edited)
The Colonel deserves a full hour on your show, Judge.. if he could spare the time.
But.. every minute that he shares his wisdom with us is worth its weight in gold.
Thank you and God bless you, Colonel.
122

3 replies

@roshanmashoor766
7 hours ago
Respect to the judge and the colonel
149

@jacktheanswer172
8 hours ago
We have to protect this channel and at all costs
329

2 replies

@All_Lives_Matters
7 hours ago
Is Israel the first country that wouldn’t celebrate it’s 100 year anniversary because they caused their own destruction?
28

5 replies

@sabirficic3537
6 hours ago
Our country has become the laughing stock of the world with our leaders
14

@stavrosaristidou5779
8 hours ago
Colonel is spot on with all the predictions he has made so far.He is a brain indeed as the judge said.
134

1 reply

@elizabethholloway6945
7 hours ago
He’s brilliant. Always clear and balanced.
84

1 reply

@LindaMcPheeters
7 hours ago
Of course this interview has drawn the largest audience of all the Colonel’s interviews on this platform to date. People are discovering that that Col. Macgregor always delivers a balanced, insightful, well-informed understanding our current geopolitical reality, and does it with a rare level of eloquence and style. Thank you both, Judge and Colonel, for a weekly, much needed dose of truth!
181

6 replies

@hbela1000
6 hours ago
Huge respect for Col. Macgregor,thanks.
23

@zekyday8064
8 hours ago
Thanks for the opportunity to hear the Colonel.
82

@tatagata6268
8 hours ago
May this video be spread widely
108

1 reply

@gerry4281
7 hours ago
Brilliant man. He should be president.
35

2 replies

@skibidi.G
7 hours ago
Thank you Judge and Col. McGregor.
39

@malcolmt7883
8 hours ago
These people have been kicked out of their host countries over a hundred times, (through no fault of their own, of course)
105

9 replies

@riaadhoosain
8 hours ago
Always a pleasure listening to you Colonel – a voice of reason and a reality check vs the bias of western media.
148

@ddevilisinthedetails
7 hours ago
we need Col’s report MONDAYS & FRIDAYS
22

@koko2bware
6 hours ago
Col. Douglas MacGregor’s analysis is brilliant as usual!!
19

@ismaelamaro7728
7 hours ago
Iran is a peace-loving nation.
67

2 replies

@kpoonwah
7 hours ago
Times of India reported that IDF admitted several air bases were hit, including aircrafts
115

2 replies

@almercy
6 hours ago
Col. Douglas MacGregor is a national gem!! Keep speaking the truth!!
16

1 reply

@martinmcconville8401
7 hours ago
An exceptionally sobering conclusion by the Colonel. Another great interview by Judge Napolitano.
23

@nmkzf
7 hours ago
One basic problem is the establishment of the “Israel” project. the project and its owners are going down with it.
52

@jimmycricket7385
7 hours ago
Especially during an election season in America, I keep seeing presidential candidates grovelling to Israel in order to secure big donations from rich jewish oligarchs.
31

3 replies

@josephszot5545
6 hours ago
Colonel, If Trump gets in he won’t send billions to Ukraine, he’ll ship it to Israel, So what’s the Dif? Taxpayer screwed either way!
12

2 replies

@eileenjames9929
7 hours ago
great men of America these two. love their discussion the col such knowledge and integrity
18

@Mxr282
8 hours ago
Brilliant man,Col
37

@katalinhorvath8139
7 hours ago
Thank you so much to both of you, regards from the UK.
32

@polromulo2475
7 hours ago
Always very interesting to listen to Col. Macgregor!
41

@keithfazio6519
7 hours ago
So distressing. Thanks for bringing the real reporting, as opposed to the propaganda seen elsewhere.
19

@javaidakhterkhan
7 hours ago
Excellent analysis let Americans listen to this and save themselves and the World.
21

1 reply

@tommyNix4098
7 hours ago
Brilliant analysis from two of the greatest minds in America. Thank you for bringing some sanity into a world of madness.
22

@vincenthickey9760
4 hours ago
Watching from Ireland these are 2 incredible intelligent human beings and a long with scot Ritter and George Galloway are the only people i choose to hear a balanced truthful dialogue unlike the bought mainstream media lies
9

@bobbybieln853
3 hours ago
Colonel is spot on! Only a matter of time before things go south for the IDF and Bibi yahoo
5

@MeLodiCarAma
8 hours ago
Guess what…the Saudis and the rest of the gulf now have a better picture of what the Russians and the Chinese can do after this recent demonstration by Iran. Ooops, I forgotten….the North Korean and Pakistan too.
18

@hanzkoenig
5 hours ago
Thank you both from Grim Britain.
9

@Maryellen514
1 hour ago
God bless you Col. Douglas Macgregor and Judge Napolitano
5

@richarderwin2369
7 hours ago
As always, Truth! Thank You.
15

@eddie-o5u
8 hours ago
Thank you so much for your brilliant show and incredible guests. Must watch programing! Best show on YouTube.
24

@cemalparla4911
8 hours ago
Colonel rocks
31

@kevga2758
4 hours ago
Thank you both, great to see , so many folk watching
12

@2581nbl
3 hours ago
The Judge and Col McGregor deserve a lot of credit for doing their best to keep us informed. Im glad this channel continues to grow. People are sick of mainstream media
7

@minn.1
7 hours ago
What kind of democracy is it when people or voters have no say about their government’s full support of a terrorist country in these crimes against humanity?
19

1 reply

@rashlatif9478
7 hours ago
Absolutely well said by Col. Douglas
19

@katedocherty264
7 hours ago
Thank you Judge for this lively and honest discussion with Col. MacGregor.
15

@Vegandi_Z
8 hours ago
Judge, I love you, but you gotta stop asking endless questions, when the Colonel already got it and tries to answer…
14

1 reply

@Sw-nv4hw
8 hours ago (edited)
Thank you 2 and my dadda designed missles too. Yet im a disabled aussie seaman. Loved and not! 2 The world needs more men like you judge and the good col. Period!
20

@simonemindfulness1057
3 hours ago
Much love to all Palestinians and Lebaneses from Brazil
4

1 reply

@928pcar
7 hours ago
The Iron Dome turned into the IRAN DOME last night LOL
25

3 replies

@G.oogleIsCensorship
7 hours ago
THE KING OF JORDAN MAKES ME SICK. CESSCH OUT
19

2 replies

@sws-vlogs
8 hours ago
Idf Juz expect us to believe they had no prior knowledge of 10/07
40

2 replies

@rac1030
7 hours ago
You’re both great men. God bless you all.
20

@plank8241
5 hours ago
So great to have COL. MacGregor on your channel! Love the man’s honesty and straightforwardness, it takes a hell lot of courage to articulate the issues that he does considering today’s situation with the freedom of speech and mass media being rather tools of repression than information sources
5

@20luzer52
6 hours ago
The problem with Judge Napolitano and Douglas Macgregor is that they have a sense of morals and principles
9

@99PUTNAM
7 hours ago
Thank you for Macgregor… brilliant and commitment to reality in opposition to the ZIONIST crazies
13

@sankheroshamoun7624
6 hours ago
Thank you Judge you get the wisest gests on your show.
10

@MarcWiedmann
4 hours ago
German here – staying up to date on information on Ukraine and the Middle East on a weekly basis due to this channel. Thanks Judge Nap, thanks Col. Macgregor. We need competent, analytical and intelligent people. I hope you are a lightpost for a lot of people. “The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either — but right through every human heart — and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained”
8

2 replies

@MikeMelia51
5 hours ago
Thanks Colonel
10

@jimtaleb4364
7 hours ago
$5.00
Thanks!
30

1 reply

@mindbliss7764
4 hours ago
I have so much respect for Col Douglas. Such a great thinker
3

@Frankchiew59
7 hours ago
King Abdullah will be deposed very soon.
8

@Smiff1066
7 hours ago
Meanwhile 10,s of thousands Americans are suffering in the South East, maybe up to a thousand have died, wheres their help?
44

8 replies

@ceaget7252
7 hours ago
Colonel Macgregor has superb knowledge, analytical skills and wisdom. A rare individual indeed.
9

1 reply

@BerndSchmitt-Martinique
5 hours ago
Aristotle: ‘Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms.’
5

@Mary-f1k8t
7 hours ago
The We Love Africa channel is very good about posting UN speeches.
11

1 reply

@WORKOUTSOLUTIONS
8 hours ago
ХРИСТОС ВОСКРЕСЕ
БОГ С НАМИ ПРОТИВ ЗЛА И ИСКУШЕНИЙ
20

1 reply

@JacquelineAgnesGilfillan
5 hours ago
Thanks for all this clarity, Judge and Colonel
4

@jonnyboy8781
6 hours ago
Judge, your show last eve with Scott was epic. History being made in real-time. Love the show, all your eminent guests & your great presenter skills. Fantastic.
11

1 reply

@richardpquette6992
6 hours ago
Complete BS: we (USA) are Ordering it, We are Arming it, We are Loading it, we are Surveilling it, we are funding it, we are deciding it, we are loading the strike data….
9

@mickgallagher6717
6 hours ago
Thank God for this highly astute, logical, sane Spiritual beings, truthtellers, Peacemakers!
2

@AngelaOMeara-th1en
2 hours ago
thanks Colonel, your voice is needed Louder and Louder.
1

@thomashand1316
6 hours ago
How many military men quote Goethe and Einstein ? Colonel McGregor is one of a kind.
7

@williamgianopulos636
8 hours ago (edited)
It’s not an Israeli-only scenario, as our guest points out. Of course not. Israel didn’t produce the 60-80 bombs that flattened the apartment complex in Beirut. We are the only game in town, so let’s start considering other options, like talking to one another again. As Churchill said, Meeting Jaw to Jaw is better than war.
11

@lucienleech-larkin7544
8 hours ago
Colonel, How Do You “Debate” A Mendacious Pseudology?!! There’s No Point At All In Arguing Against A Narrative Which Has No Relationship To The Actual Facts!! All You Can Do, Is Get Rid Of The Bastards Who Are Lying To You; Anything Else Is Just Irrelevant!!
5

@bittertruth3295
6 hours ago
Great man col McGregor, always on point. Thank you Judge for inviting him.
1

@williammichael2156
6 hours ago
Thanks gents,blessings from Glasgow
4

@bravestone8933
8 hours ago (edited)
King of Jordan is like the former president Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan.
27

2 replies

@vancouver_dad5195
7 hours ago
Love from the Philippines
10

@a.j.rainey3024
7 hours ago
After last April’s missile exchange, Russia supplied Iran with S400/500 air defense systems along with most advanced “radar jamming” systems. If US/Israel attacks Iran many fighter/bomber jets will be downed. Manned jet fighters are rapidly becoming obsolete in todays war theater.
13

2 replies

@MochoCoLaTo911
5 hours ago
From Canada, I seriously think that if we put the people we use to see in Judge Napolitano Chanel in charge of the Gov. they will make USA great again and for a long long time !
2

@johnoneill192
7 hours ago
It’s quite obvious that the leaders of Egypt and Jordan still have PTSD from 1967 particularly and also 1973 and are frozen with fear of a repeat of those wars against Israel ( and of course America as they could destroy Israel if they combined forces if America wasn’t backing Israel unconditionally ) but I think the ordinary people of all the Muslim nations have really had enough of Israel’s atrocities against fellow Arabs. This Netenyahu maniac wants war with all his neighbours and is only in a position to prosecute these wars on multiple fronts because of American backing
15

4 replies

@Harvey-Sp
8 hours ago
Judge, You among the wise men in our country. The UAP threat is real. What’s going on in the Middle East is nothing comparable to the UAP threat.
6

1 reply

@feryag
7 hours ago
From a very insightful man “genius consistent of knowing when to stop.” Thank you, Col. Macgregor.
6

@bulentunal3832
7 hours ago
you are right judge. he is a waste, King Abdullah
7

@ShortbusMooner
7 hours ago
Thank you so much, gentlemen!
5

@louisepelte2942
7 hours ago
Very depressing as usual.
7

@NoorFalastin110
6 hours ago
Thank you for all you do gentlemen. Thank you for choosing humanity
1

@juanluistostadocanales3955
7 hours ago
That is right Colonel
8

@SADIKDIN
6 hours ago
A little 3 yr old girl being stucked under a rubble with 1 arm decacipitated crying and pleaded, ‘Mummy I want to go home,…I want to go home’. But her parents already died under the rubble and no way to rescue the little girl. The nexf day the little girl died of agony being pinned under the rubble. Can we sleep at night knowing all these horrifying events are happening to thousands of little children?
9

2 replies

@chrisnicolis1304
2 hours ago
The judge has compiled an impressive list of guests over the last couple of years. I never fail to be impressed by the knowledge and wisdom of Colonel Macgregor
1

@davidlaw1690
4 hours ago
America is Israel’s little nodding duck
3

@christiancommunistpartyoft8691
5 hours ago
Israel is doomed
4

@Linus-k6c
6 hours ago
It’s always a big joy to listen to you and to Macgregor. The final statement is brilliant. The final statement will remain in history. The final statement is truly inspiring. Hope to see you soon. Thank you very much.
1

@lindachan5610
17 minutes ago
Good final reflection from Colonel Macgregor. Stopping in time is better than losing everything.
1

@nazhamerabi4395
7 hours ago
The Iranians need to listen to Col. Macgregor. Why are they holding back? That was Hassan Nasrallah’s mistake listening to them. It’s now or never!!!
16

1 reply

@chrisgreene2623
7 hours ago
The Colonel is in the house!
5

@craigaxle1096
6 hours ago
Praying for peace, healing & reconciliation in the middle east, Ukraine-Russia, Sudan , China, …
1

@sinaisapour7584
3 hours ago
Long live Iran and the resistance
2

@elwoodguy7955
8 hours ago
Wonder how Bibi reflects on his speech at the UN LAST week? Given how Iran responded to it l believe he thinks it may of been an error. Whilst the UN has been giving speech after speech -deploring Bibi -iran steps up well done Iran
5

@arifurrahman2891
7 hours ago
Colonel’s last words are highly terrifying. Something extremely devastating is going to visit the entire ME region in the months and years ahead. Current standing of things will only keep deteriorating from this moment onward.
4

@paullilliott7565
6 hours ago
‘Safe and effective’……
‘Defeated and ineffective’
same script writer?
Very valuable last words, Colonel. Thank you both for keeping us informed.
1

@mariojcollado1384
1 hour ago
Col. MacGregor is a valuable asset as we pursue clarity and potential resolutions for conflicts home and abroad
1

@fordshaw5833
4 hours ago
Colonel Macgregor’s mention of Israel’s habit of heavy handed use of lethal force
reminds me of the Confucian maxim, “Never use cannon to kill mosquito”. So far Israel has shown little economy of effort in their combat operations which says something about whose picking up the tab for their war which would have otherwise bankrupted the Israeli tax base.
8

1 reply

@MrCarhoo
7 hours ago
Thanks doug
5

@RobinaOmar-o3e
7 hours ago
Absolutely fantastic, madness he has said is repeating an exercise and expecting a different result. Israelis have been doing this for decades and hoping for a different result.
2

@kilok9599
7 hours ago
Brilliant analysis as always. Luv the Col!
6

@RNX09
6 hours ago
Thanks Judge for persisting with these videos with your informative guests. All of them are great.
1

@mariadasilva3444
5 hours ago
Thanks Judge and Col. MacGregor. Good to know unbiased truth.

@HoldTheBacon
1 hour ago
I don’t understand how we can pass bills in congress in a matter of seconds when it comes to giving Israel billions yet we can’t fix healthcare or our infrastructure at minimum.
3

1 reply

@peaceb4
3 hours ago
I’m almost certain that America’s own law would forbid the sale or supply of weapons to any country that has Nuclear Weapons while not being a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty!
5

1 reply

@nicholasmartiau1728
6 hours ago
Col. Ma Gregor is 2nd to none with his unique inside insight gained from decades of commanding soldiers and armies who executed some of histories most daring and consequential actions. Thanks Judge for having Colonel MacG on you show! We really appreciate it.
1

@EduardoArtistaDelavega
4 hours ago
Iran is not our enemy.
2

@wanderingquestions7501
5 hours ago
I would like to see episodes in which guests are able to identify for us voters which of our politicians are strongly owned by AIPAC. This would be helpful for identifying who one may wish, or not wish to vote for.
4

@avinadehnad1058
7 hours ago (edited)
Colonel Macgregor, thank you for your thoughtful insight. The only thing that was not accurate was that:
Iranians would never align themselves with the Israeli government because they are morally against the Israeli governments Genocide and Indiscriminate killings, and because of over 40 years of illegal sanctions, assassinations, and malignment of Iran, just because they criticize Apartheid in Israel. It has nothing to do with the ‘not aligning with Jews’* as you mentioned, although I understand the spirit of what you said. If Iranians have any problems with their government, Iranians are very capable of dealing with it together, and don’t need Netanyahu stick his murderous axe in.
*Iran has one of the largest and oldest Jewish populations in the middle east. They have lived in harmony with other religions in Iran for thousands of years. Iran being against Jews is part of the Pompeo warmongering narrative that has been debunked by historians and Iranian Jews continuously through intelligent media.
3

@jkb728
3 hours ago
Judge and colonel mcgregor absolute wisdom
1

@RuaidhriOSioradain
3 hours ago
Thanks Judge excellent as per usual, Col, I salute you, wonderful analyst
1

@volkiruski1221
7 hours ago
That Jordan Puppet King is also and only Bla bla, real arabs, lots of talking, like always!! Time for change to another king. I tought his wife has more guts?
6

1 reply

@gustav4539
6 hours ago
I know I’m being “directed” by a YT algorithm because I watched a few videos featuring John Mersheimer and Jeffrey Sachs, but it seems like American critics of the actions of Israel are getting more numerous. When I started understanding this situation 25 years ago it was mainly lefties like Chomsky and Finkelstein who were criticizing Israel. This is a good development, even if right-wingers came to this through America First.
3

@AshrafAnwar-e7s
3 hours ago
Brilliant as usual. Thank you both.
1

@jackypackham7666
6 hours ago
I’d vote for him, shame he isn’t standing in the UK.
1

@nm1978
7 hours ago
man speaking logic
3

@farishtajebran7317
8 hours ago
We salute IranWe support IranWe stand with IranWe pray for Iran,s victory Thank you Iran
23

@MohamedAhmed-sc3yq
7 hours ago
Well said.
3

@nosceteipsum997
3 hours ago
Extremely wise words, colonel! Thumbs up from the UK!!

@mattyarrow4406
2 hours ago
Thanks to the both of you for a great interview.
1

@ExileTheKnightsOfMaltaNow
8 hours ago
Say hello to our heretic October surprise…… Pope Clement 14th birthday is October 31st and we are going to honor his Devotion to expelling Jesuit order from all the de facto Roman cartel Nations
7

@miss_rini
6 hours ago
Something about McGregor’s energy, it makes me feel just a little safer. Like it might feel if the US did have leaders who could convey strength and power with the people; as opposed to power over people.
5

1 reply

@byronhay1648
2 hours ago
Colonel Douglas Macgregor’s Analysis is right on.

@danielperez-sz2ii
35 minutes ago
Great analysis by two real Patriots! Thank you gentlemen.

@RUcookoo
3 hours ago
Is America still paying Egypt and Israel millions a year not to fight each other ?
3

2 replies

@musajallow5710
7 hours ago
great colonel indeed
4

@AntonioJose-fy3zh
1 hour ago
Thanks Coronel Douglas Macgregor…for exposing the world of reality

@hussmortada
5 hours ago
The most revealing and honest interview I have seen since the start of the conflict. Very interesting indeed, calling a spade a spade. Hat off to you both.
1

@MA-sk4fg
7 hours ago
The sad thing about these futile wars is that lots of people got killed for absolutely nothing!!! What a waste of souls.
3

@Puzian
7 hours ago
The Colonel isn’t correct about Türkiye. So far, all the Turks have done is talk. They will not fight. They will not stop the oil.
21

13 replies

@betweendrinks8885
4 hours ago
One day you’ll wake to NO judge and Doug – no internet – no TV broadcast – no power – skies blazing from afar and darkening – sirens in distance – heat unbearable- and no going back to what we once had
2

@maxmurphy7306
3 hours ago
Great full cycle analysis guys.
Thank you judge Napolitano and colonel macgregor.
TRUE AMERICAN GRIT.

@Al7amed
8 hours ago
Iran didn’t signal anyone this time ! That was the last time, not this time.
10

2 replies

@neviocapodagli4742
7 hours ago
Amazing
3

@dbassman27
5 hours ago
I value Col. Macgregor’s comments. Voice of sanity and reason in a maelstrom of hate and insanity.

@POLISHAMERICANLEGIONS
1 hour ago
Thank you very much for the great analysis great us Patriot colonel graduate of two military institutes and also to the Justice Napolitano for your great analysis every day and I am Polish American from McLean Virginia
2

@MultiPrairiedog
6 hours ago
A vote for Trump or Harris is a vote for israel.
13

4 replies

@TheVigilantEye77
8 hours ago
The Constitution? What is that ?
4

1 reply

@INNIMA
1 hour ago
Im sick and tired of the iranian restraint
1

@davetrump1584
8 hours ago
Hypersonic weapons, like ballistic missiles, fly at speeds of at least Mach 5, or roughly 1 mile per second. Unlike ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons do not follow a ballistic trajectory and can maneuver en route to their target.
22

5 replies

@carlosorff
6 hours ago (edited)
Iran must not fall, as it is the gate to Russia from the south. So be prepared for Russia and China to protect its interest.Also the Turks. 31:37 I really do admire the wisdom of Mr. MacGregor and I agree fully with his last thought.
4

@RiyadHaybe
3 hours ago
I agree with last Statement that the Colonel made. Very Dangerous!
2

@McKav
9 minutes ago
Col. Macgregor (ret.) is brilliant. His analysis is crucial to understanding the true facts

@xp3703
7 hours ago
King of Jordan: “Elocuent but irrelevant” Precisely. So well said
11

@L16s13O-
7 hours ago
Future VP Vance? How presumptuous of you. I’m not for neither one of them but Trump is no better.
4

@litttoe
3 hours ago
It’s unbelievable that we are at this point in reality.
1

@peaceb4
3 hours ago
A fair and just UN would send UN Peacekeepers to Gaza and UN Weapons Inspectors to Israel
2

@gnosticbrian3980
7 hours ago
Read the Brookings Institute strategy document titled: “Which path to Persia?: options for a new American strategy toward Iran”. Written in 2009, it sets out how America could use Israel as a proxy to sow discord and war throughout the Middle East. And that template appears to have been followed.
5

3 replies

@letterpress01
7 hours ago
Other podcasts have reported that the Israelis were taken by surprise and there was a great deal of damage done. Some of the videos show dozens of ballistic missiles hitting the airbase. The opposite of what you are describing though I am a fan Colonel.
3

1 reply

@DarrenSmith-tq2xz
1 hour ago
Thanks for the great content once again God bless you col Douglas magregor and judge napalotano stay safe and well both of you

@bullasbullas
3 hours ago
Another great show Judge. Keep it coming.

@mariadasilva3444
5 hours ago
The King of Jordan speech is convincing! However, it’s just “empty” words! Don’t trust him at all!
5

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. We are live. It is the 19th of September 2024. We’re actually live on Twitter. Live on X for the first time.

 

Finally rigged it. I don’t know why I didn’t start streaming these streams on Twitter earlier because, yeah, it’s just like an obviously good platform. I saw some other nationalists that have been streaming up there and they got crazy numbers of views and they get a shitload of, … I remember when I did streams with Elijah Schaffer, he streamed it on X as well and it got heaps of views. We’re going to stream every show on Twitter now.

 

So you can watch the show on Twitter, but if you’re already accustomed to watching it on Rumble, stay on Rumble because the Rumble’s got a good live chat.

 

So you can stay on the live chat on Rumble. And also we’re on Odysee. But yeah, you can watch on Twitter. And the replay will be available. I think it automatically re-uploads as a replay. So we’ll see. Hopefully there’s no technical difficulties this time, but we’re into the show. Tom actually going to join us. He’s just turned his webcam off because he’s smashing down his late dinner and it’d be a little bit uncouth for him to finish it on stream.

 

So we’re going to start off with me and Blair. Blair, how you doing this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m good, man. I’m just trying to figure out how I change my settings on X to see quote, unquote, “sensitive content” because I just reshared this stream on X. Really excited to be streaming on X, by the way. First time we’ve done it, as Joel said, so should really soak up some new viewers, which is great. But how do I change my settings so I can see sensitive content? Like, does anyone have any instructions for me?

 

Joel Davis: I’ve got all these blocks on my account. Anything that goes on my account is classified as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it sucks!

 

But look, someone sent me an instruction on how to do that. We won’t get into it on the stream to divert the conversation that way, but someone tell me how to do that because I’m a little bit boomer tech with this stuff.

 

But yeah, I’m going well, really busy. I’m working as much as I can to make a bit of money for an endeavour of mine that’s coming up next month. But other than that, yeah, man, I’m just keeping an eye on current affairs.

 

Our mutual friend Thomas Sewell caught up with upcoming young Australian influencer today. So we might talk a little bit about that. I saw that you’ve been getting into a bit of back and forth with Fuentes, so that’ll be interesting to get your take on what’s happening there. But how you feeling Tom Sewell. What’s up?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m great. Just had a busy afternoon, but glad to be on the show. I just watched over that video. I thought the young guy did a good job. You can tell he’s very afraid of censorship. So we did, like, a half an hour interview, and he put up maybe four minutes of it, and the rest is just him at 7/11 being casually racist and funny.

 

So I have high hopes for the young man. It’s a shame that that generation’s kind of got a lot of brain rot. But you just got to roll with the punches.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll just show it here on the screen.

 

So this is the video. Tom just got interviewed by this guy, Max Caruso on YouTube. He just uploaded the video about an hour ago. And, yeah, he does these things where he goes and interviews gangsters and different people. And he decided to interview Tom.

 

So I haven’t actually seen it yet because he just uploaded it. But after Tom went and did the interview, he came to training, and it sounded like he had a good time. And it was a lot of fun. So should be some fun content.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s sad he’s so concerned about censorship, he left out a lot of the funny stuff.

 

So he would ask a question and I would just nonchalantly sort of answer it in a way that would just be normal in our scene. But for someone that’s very, very neutral politically and not exposed to our scene, he just found everything that I was saying hilarious in a kind of not in a nervous way, necessarily, but I think that generation are so divorced from just truth, just stern truth. They’re used to people, like, beating around the bush, and then they can’t even say faggot at school or like, there’s a lot of things that they don’t expect people to say.

 

So when I was explaining things the way that I sometimes do, I try to keep it as short and as succinct as possible because I knew his audience would have a short attention span. And he left out. I got him laughing quite a bit. Like, he left out a lot of the gold. Like he said to me at one point:

 

“I just always kind of I understand what you’re saying, but I grew up with this idea that Australia was for everyone.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“For everyone?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Yeah, you know, we’re multicultural. Just everyone can come here.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“If everyone is Australian, then what does Australian mean?”

 

And he just went really blank and kind of looked at the ground awkwardly.

 

And I was like:

 

“If every colour is red, then what colour is red?”

 

And he kind of just had, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a great analogy. Wow, that’s great!

 

[05:09]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he just had this, like, windows 95 kind of like loading screen or like Apple loading screen. It’s like, do, do, do! Yeah, he was just like, … And then even the cameraman started laughing. And it’s sad that he left stuff like that out because that, to me, is really funny, confronting logic that they’ve never been exposed to as young people. And, yeah, there was another time where he sort of asked the same question again in a different way to get a different answer.

 

And I was like:

 

“All right, I’ll say something even dumber because., …”

 

Well, not dumber, but I’ll say something that maybe would be more controversial or more able to get on YouTube than what I just said. Cause it makes too much sense.

 

And I said to him:

 

“So you’re saying Belay [sp] is just as Australian as me?”

 

And he just lost it! He was like:

 

“Did you just click at me?”

 

Like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

“Well, they can’t. They’re cannibals, aren’t they? From the Congo, like, Belay.”

 

And it was a good time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I can tell he wants to make something of himself, this guy. You know, he’s probably trying to protect his brand somewhat, as a lot of you know, upcoming influencers try to do.

 

Joel Davis: But hopefully, … I said, be very careful.

 

Thomas Sewell: I said, be very careful about getting a YouTube strike if you want to make it with what you’re doing. Be very careful with your interview with me. Like, don’t put too much up. Be very careful.

 

Blair Cottrell: As you know, Tom, like, YouTube strikes, they don’t have to give you strikes. They can just delete you! If he’s seen to be platforming someone who’s like a significant or considered some sort of threat to national security, that’s what Intelligence will say. YouTube will just take it, take his account down completely. So it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. Like, he’s in dangerous territory. I think he doesn’t understand how dangerous the territory is in censorship terms.

 

But, yeah, it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. And I’m glad it was fun. I’m going to watch it. I haven’t watched it yet. I watched it on mute while Joel and I were warming up just to get perspective of the vibe. And it looked like good fun.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’d be interesting to give it a watch after this, but in the meantime, we’ve got a stream to do. And there’s some subjects I really wanted to cover this evening. And the catalyst for it was., … Yeah, like, I got into a little bit of an argument with Nick Fuentes on Twitter, but it was an amicable argument. I just basically restated my criticism of the idea that we could form some kind of alliance politically with Muslims or other non-White factions that would be reliable in any way because they have completely different interests. Like, White people have specific existential interests, other groups have different interests. Maybe they converge on a particular issue.

 

But as the news cycle shifts, as things happen, eventually we find ourselves on opposite sides on another issue and the alliance breaks down. That’s why race needs to be the principle, because that provides consistency. There is always a pro-White position that is consistent on every issue, and we have blood loyalty to one another. We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race. We’re being attacked as a race, and the survival of our race is ultimately dependent upon our ability to reassert ourselves as a race. And no one else is going to come and save us but ourselves. And that’s just the reality. I see the political reality.

 

So I see any of this attempt at extending the political definition to include non-Whites, as just a waste of time, a waste of energy, fundamentally unstable. And it might seem like it’s a good idea temporarily, but it will always end up kind of falling apart in time. So I reiterated my point on that. And we had a little bit of a back and forth, particularly over the Israel-Palestine thing, because obviously, fuck Israel! Obviously we stand opposed to the jews and we want Israel cut off. I think we would actually want the jews expelled from all Western countries and Israel cut off completely.

 

But having said that, putting all of this political energy, and this isn’t something that I necessarily accused Fuentes of doing, but a lot of other people in the scene did this to excess, of putting way too much political energy, I think, into defending Palestine and focusing upon the pro-Palestine movement, which is led by brown people, brown immigrants in the West, in alliance with communists. Two enemy factions of us! Putting all of this energy into the pro-Palestine movement to the point that what are we getting out of that? They don’t have any sympathy for us. They don’t do anything for White people. In fact, communists and browns that make up this core coalition, they’re directly opposed to us and our direct political enemies.

 

So I’m not going to put much political energy into defending the pro-Palestine cause. I’m quite happy to criticise Israel, to attack Israel, to attack jewish influence. But from a pro-White perspective, from the perspective that White people shouldn’t be funding or supporting this foreign state, why do we go to war in Iraq for Israel’s interests? Obviously, it’s because of jewish infiltration and subversion of western governments. And not one White soldier should have given his life to defend Israel’s interests. I mean, that’s insane!

 

[10:24]

 

So obviously we agree on that point, but I think the criticism should be from a pro-White standpoint. We should criticise jews on the basis of how jewish power adversely affects White people, not how it adversely affects other groups. So that we remain entrenched in asserting our particular interests as a race and as a people. The retort was:

 

“Okay, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be reduced to that. All of these liberal and Islamic critics of Israel are still putting negative attention on the jews, and this is waking people up to the problem with the jews and so on.”

 

And I said:

 

“I don’t really think that’s the case.”

 

For me, there’s plenty of anti-Israel sentiment in the community. It’s a totally normal position. At least half of society is pro-Palestine, at least in most Western countries pro-Palestinian sentiment is actually higher than pro-Israel sentiment. There’s a lot of celebrities that are pro-Palestinian. The entire Left basically is pro-Palestinian in the rank and file. Obviously, the jews have captured the major centr-Left parties and keep them kind of in a more neutral position on the issue, leaning more towards the pro-Israel position.

 

But ultimately, the average Leftist is pretty anti-Israel. So does that mean that they’re anti-jewish? No, because they criticise Israel from a racial egalitarian perspective. The perspective that:

 

“The problem with Israel is that it’s a settler colonial, western White supremacist state.”

 

And they use basically the same criticism of Israel that they used to criticise the White settlement of Australia or the White settlement of the United States or Canada or whatever, and to de-legitimize that.

 

And so I don’t want to play into that framework. Because as a White Australian, that directly undermines me as well! I mean, I’m against Israel because it’s jewish! Not because it’s settler, colonialist or because it’s supremacist or any of these other things.

 

So anyway, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, if you had to pick a side, what side would it be?

 

Joel Davis: I would pick Palestine, because fuck jews! But I don’t have to pick a side necessarily. Like, I picked the side of the Whiteman, because I’m White. I pick my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Let me be clear. Let me be clear. Like, if Israel just incinerates a million Palestinians with incendiary bombs tonight, I don’t care!

 

And I also don’t care if, what are they, Hamas and Hezbollah? I don’t care if they gas a million jews tomorrow. I don’t care! I’m an Australian racist. I don’t care! My only concern would be, okay, how are we going to develop, build up and defend our national existence against these psychopaths killing each other over there? That’s what concerns me. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah. It makes sense to only be concerned with your own people, as opposed to worried about a foreign conflict. The only reason it’s our problem is because the jews are in our country, making it our problem through infiltrating our government and sending our resources, and most particularly American resources, to the aid of Israel and getting us involved in their conflict.

 

And then also, then we get the Palestinian immigrants brought into our countries as well, and that becomes other Islamic immigrants in general.

 

And so then we’ve got a pro-Palestine movement and a pro-zionist movement clashing in Australian politics and in all Western political dynamics, when it shouldn’t be our fucking problem! There shouldn’t be any jews or Palestinians or Muslims in any of our countries! And it should just be some weird foreign conflict that you read about on like, page 30 of the newspaper or something. It shouldn’t be something that we have to care about.

 

So anyway, that was the argument. So then a lot of people kept Superchatting, I think Nick’s show this week, asking him about me. And there was a response that he gave. I thought we could watch it and react to it. Not because it’s a big deal, the personal attack, but more because he then attacked street activism. He attacked basically our organisation and basically said:

 

“Oh, what’s the point of marching in the street in black? And so on?”

 

And so I thought it would be good to respond to it, to kind of explain, what our actual philosophy is behind doing it. Because this is something that is important, I think, to reiterate. Like, obviously, it’s a major part of what we do. So we’re going to explain why we do it.

 

But anyway, I’ll play the clip. I got the clip here. I’ll play the clip and we’ll analyze it’s actually a nine minute clip. I don’t know if I want to play the whole thing, it would take ages.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll do my best to pay attention.

 

Joel Davis: Sorry?

 

Thomas Sewell: The most important part is the last section, so maybe play the start and play the end.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll play the final clip.

 

Superchat: Skip sent $10. Could you elaborate on your thoughts about Joel Davis? The wignat circles he’s now a part of seem to always criticise you, which is disappointing. Always saw him as a potential Australian version of you. Would you be down to debate him in Twitter space?

 

Nick Fuentes: Well, the truth is, it’s kind of irrelevant, because he lives in Australia.

 

So I just don’t really care that much about, … Look, what does Australia have to do with us? That guy’s not American, so what does he have to do with us?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, then he proceeds to talk about me for nine minutes, so it must have something to do with you.

 

But anyway, I’ll try and skip to the point at which he talks about street activism.

 

[15:55]

 

Nick Fuentes: We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. [word unclear] reform. I don’t know what the model is there. Like lowbrow, … I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to. And it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind who he’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know. So are you really committed? Are you really serious about your core convictions if you’re changing them all the time?

 

Joel Davis: So, okay, so this part, he kind of criticised me, saying that I flip flopped on Christianity.

 

I started out online as kind of more of an intellectual, doing intellectual content, like theory cell content. I wasn’t doing activism then.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t picture that! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I wasn’t doing activism then, but basically I started out doing that kind of content. But at that time, my worldview wasn’t a million miles away from where it is now. I was a kind of Nietzschean, imperialist, racialist at that time. And that kind of my guiding kind of philosophy.

 

Then I went through a phase of trying to give Christianity a chance. I was raised a Christian. I turned away from the faith in my teens, and I tried to give it a chance again as an adult. And I ended up giving Catholicism a chance. I was raised a Protestant, and I was kind of I couldn’t go back to that. So I thought maybe I had the wrong brand. Maybe if I go back to the original brand, if I go back to Coke rather than Pepsi, it might taste better.

 

And I gave it a proper chance. I really did. That was a sincere thing. I don’t really see how that indicates that I lack conviction, to give a religion a chance, then ultimately, I just don’t. I lost my. I don’t have faith in the Church. I don’t think the Church is a legitimate institution.

 

But this whole time, I was a White nationalist. I never was nothing racially focused. I was never not pro-White. I’ve been pretty consistent in that core principle.

 

So the time in which I was a Catholic, I was a White nationalist, I was a Holocaust revisionist or denier, whatever you want to call it. You know, I talked about World War Two. I talked about the Nazis in positive terms. I defended Hitler. So it isn’t like this is like a million miles away from [chuckling] what I was doing before. I just basically had a religious phase. But he’s kind of defining that as flip flopping, like saying that what I’m doing now, I don’t have conviction.

 

I decided to get involved in activism. I surveyed the Australian scene. This is the only project that I thought was interesting and that was going anywhere in a positive way. So I decided to embrace this particular project. It aligned with my convictions and with my personality.

 

So that’s why I’m doing what I’m doing. Apparently, that’s flip flopping. Anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. It seems like a pretty standard process of development. It’s not really flip flopping. Yeah, but that’s just my take.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, maybe Hitler was right when Hitler said that you shouldn’t get involved in politics until you’re 30, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t say that! You’re not even 30 yet. Right?

 

So you’re still, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Maybe he was correct about that. Maybe I should have, like, finished, … Because now I’m kind of in my. I think I’ve finished my kind of maturing. I’ve kind of arrived. And maybe I should have waited.

 

But at the same time, I don’t really regret my previous involvements, because, as I said, it’s not like I haven’t been pro-White or, basically agitating for the same things the whole time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Tom and I got started early too. We got started early. And I don’t think either of us regret it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And you guys got started in a position that in now as well. Like, you tried a project. It wasn’t exactly the right formula. Like, you had some success, but it wasn’t exactly the right formula. Went back to the drawing board, reassessed. You have to learn on the job! And I feel like, similar to me. I tried some things out earnestly and then went back to the drawing board and revised it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I actually had conversation with Jim Salem, who at the time was called the “grandfather of Australian White nationalism”. When I was 21 and I was first getting involved in public activism, and I went up to “The Bunker”, as they call it, in Sydney in Tempe, and I said to him that quote, I said:

 

“You know, Hitler described that a man wasn’t politically mature until 30. And should I sort of just keep observing and keep an eye on things and keep developing myself and then maybe emerge as a political commentator, or a political leader, or a political activist at 30?”

 

And he said:

 

“No, no, there’s a lot that I disagree with Hitler on. That’s ridiculous! Alexander the Great defeated the Persians when he was 21 years old!”

 

At one of the battles. Can’t remember the battle, but he mentioned the battle specifically.

 

And, I mean, that is slightly different in the sense that he was born the son of a king. So that kind of helps get your political career up and running at 21! But it was a fair point. It was a fair point. I think he said something like, he’d conquered, like, a third of the known world by 28.

 

And so, yeah, I think Joel’s comments are fair. I think Nick’s comments on this, especially, are unfair. This idea, I can’t consider Joel someone that’s flip flopped on any of these issues. That’s the thing about being a political commentator, like Nick or like Joel or like ourselves, we make a thousand takes over the course of two years or three years.

 

So you can selectively pick, you know, anything and put them in distinction to each other or play them at the same time as each other. And it can appear that someone’s flip flopped on their views. And that’s not true. That’s not consistent with what Joel’s development has been like. And anyone to try to go back to their religious roots and explore Catholicism and then say:

 

“Well, that’s not for me.”

 

You know, that’s fine and noble. And obviously, Nick is personally affected by that. Nick’s a Catholic, isn’t he? So he would see that as some sort of apostasy. So that’s a personal dig. Like, he feels that’s an attack on his faith, that’s an attack on his convictions.

 

And then the other comments, the what’s it called? Not homophobic. What is it? The homoeroticism or whatever that he’s trying to bring up is just more of a projection of his own psyche. He’s the one with the gay accusations.

 

[22:36]

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh! Oh!

 

Thomas Sewell: This is the truth! Like when there’s been multiple occasions where his tabs have been open in the background and he said that he’s been hacked. Everyone’s defended him and protected him, but this is the stuff that’s been smeared against him and his associations with Catboy Cammy, who, like, would suck dildos on livestream. And he was friends with this guy and he did sleepovers with Catboy Cammie. That’s fucking weird! So he’s got some dubious associations, and he’s made many dubious comments.

 

And then to be involved in a nationalist organisation that has established leadership, that has established figureheads, it’s such a strange take that Nick has that to join an organisation must mean that you’re homosexually attracted to the leader. Is that why Nick isn’t involved in an organisation? Because he would have he would have to love big daddy Trump to join the Republican Party, or he’s got some strange, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe there’s no American. Maybe no American organize leaders are hot enough for Nick? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. Maybe.

 

But, yeah, it’s very immature. And he shouldn’t be punching Right. He is to the Left of us. He shouldn’t be punching Right.

 

But anyway, I’ll let you continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t have a problem with him expressing criticism of my views on whatever subject.

 

But, I mean, I’ve always been a friend to Nick. I’ve defended him from some people that I think have given him unfair criticism and personal attacks many times in the past, because I’m a pretty fair and reasonable person.

 

So it’s kind of weird to be like, yeah, I don’t think anyone really thinks I’m a faggot. You know, that’s not really a problem that I have to deal with. So it’s kind of weird for him to go there, but anyway.

 

Nick Fuentes: You bounce right out of it. And now you’re a NatSoc, and it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind, who’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know.

And the whole thing’s just kind of like, it’s too, like, lowbrow. Like, I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to have political Reform because a bunch of meatheads dress in all black and yell the n-word, throwing up Nazi salutes. Like, I don’t think that’s ever actually going to lead to political reform.

 

Joel Davis: By the way, this idea that I don’t think we’ve ever, like, yelled the n-word in at a public rally because there isn’t any black people really, in Australia to speak of I mean, there’s a few, but it’s not that relevant. So I don’t even know what he’s talking about there.

 

I mean, yeah, we do pretty, like hardcore rallies that can be kind of aggressive and militant, but, yeah, and even if we did yell, the n-word, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Political upheaval is a collection of activities that all sort of have that collaborative effect. It’s not like yeah, a bunch of guys protesting isn’t the only reason political change happens, but it might be integral in some way, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, the reason why we go into the street is, there’s multiple reasons. But one reason is because it provokes a reaction from the media, from the political class. I mean, the last few times that we’ve done rallies.

 

So the last rally that we did, we had the “Fuck Off! We’re Full!” rally where we confronted the refugee encampment. We forced Dvir Abramovich to go onto the news and a bunch of politicians to go into the news and argue about it. And Dvir Abramovich, by the way, is the Australian Jonathan Greenblatt, basically for the American audience. Like, he’s the jew that runs our version of the ADL [Anti-Defamation League].

 

He had to go on the news and explain “Great Replacement Theory” to the Australian people. And that, like that’s what we’re motivated by. We think that, like, White people are being replaced and this crazy conspiracy theory, and that’s what we’re there for.

 

And so that was brilliant! And the clips from that rally, by my count, of everything that I saw, accumulated at least 5 million views online on TikTok, on Twitter.

 

And the rally we did before that, where we, the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally that also got millions and millions of views online. It went all over the media sthings we have done in Sydney and Melbourne and so on, where the prime minister has had to come out into the media and condemn us or the premier of various states, like top level politicians, leaders from the jewish community and so on. So we provoke a reaction, to then get the Australian people to become aware of us. And we’ve become somewhat of a brand in Australian politics. So there’s a meta-political aspect to that.

 

But at the same time, there is also a recruitment aspect. Like we are showing ourselves to the people to say:

 

“Hey, come and join us!”

 

And every time we do a rally, we get a spike in recruits. Ultimately, we don’t have anywhere near enough people. But you’ve got to start somewhere.

 

Our idea is, well, if we keep doing this and we keep recruiting, in a few years time there’s going to be thousands of us. In a few more years time, maybe tens of thousands, and then it has a completely different connotation. Now we are literally mobilising seriously large quantities of White men in every city in Australia in a very prominent and powerful way that then becomes very interesting politically. But you have to start somewhere.

 

[28:17]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s applying pressure and it’s forcing the establishment to react to what you’re doing, rather than you always having to react to what the establishment is doing. Right. So it puts you in a powerful position. And sure, there’s consequences, but that’s the fun of it, [chuckling] in my opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s also about a kind of dramatisation. So it’s about showing that there’s one thing to have ideas and to promote ideas, but it’s another thing to go and stand in the street in a militant way in representation of those ideas. Because what that does is it shows that there is now an actor to support. There is a group, there is a movement, there is a representation of those ideas in a concrete formation of men. And, yeah, you could say:

 

“Well, it’s only 20 guys, 50 guys, 100 guys. Is that such a big deal?”

 

As I said, we’ve got to start somewhere. But we managed to get the prime minister of the country to talk about it, the top jews in the country to freak out about it all over the mainstream media and get millions of people to watch clips of it on the Internet. Many of the comments of which are massively supportive, by the way. You know, we’re creating a, we’re doing a performance art, basically. It’s a performance art with an audience of millions that gets a reaction out of the entire political elite of our country that has thousands and thousands, if not tens of thousands of people, sometimes even more, showing their support to us online.

 

So that’s a powerful act. There’s something there that you have to acknowledge in objective metrics.

 

Additionally, again, it’s a beginning point. We believe that the only way in which we can take on the system is ultimately to get White men organised in large quantities, explicitly around their race. And you could do that by basically getting no media attention and having like no public presence whatsoever! And you could see how many men you recruit and you could see how far you get and how much influence you have, or you could go and take on all the negative aspects of that, which is pressure from the feds, pressure from the state, pressure from the media.

 

But at the same time, you’re there, you’re in front of the people, you’re providing a concrete option. We believe that if we grow to a certain size, that hundreds of thousands of people that already sympathize with us in the Australian community, that so many of them will come and join our ranks once we get to a certain size, because they will see that:

 

“Wow! This is actually going somewhere. This is a movement I can believe in!”

 

It’s really hard to get people to believe in something when it’s a small amount of people or when it’s just an idea.

 

But when you start to show there’s thousands of men that have this idea that are going to stand together, united in this particular place at this particular time, then all of a sudden it becomes something to actually believe in. And you’re believing now in a people, in a group of people, as opposed to just a concept. Because there’s millions of Australians that the concepts of White nationalism will appeal to, but they’ve got no concrete people to go and support. They’ve got no concrete leadership to believe in, to galvanise around that idea. They just simply go:

 

“Oh, yeah, it sucks that immigration is happening and it sucks what’s happening to White people, but what am I going to do about it?”

 

We’re creating something for them to actually concretely believe in and to support.

 

But anyway, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you do, before you click play, we’ve got well over one and a half thousand live viewers, almost approaching 2,000 actually on X, which is awesome for our first ever X stream!

 

Joel Davis: Not sure if that’s live viewers. I think the way that Twitter counts views is just anyone who views it just becomes a view. I don’t think they’re all necessarily viewing it all at the same time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, well, it’s still a great amount of viewership and probably more than we get on Rumble. So just wanted to throw out some appreciation to everybody who is tuning in active in the live chat. That’s awesome! Thanks, guys.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s good. I think it will expand the audience. I mean, there’s still a lot of people watching a Rumble and Odysee, as usual. So, yeah, why not add the extra platform?

 

But, yeah, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

[32:37]

 

Nick Fuentes: I don’t know what the model is there. I don’t know what the strategy is there. But he went from kind of like, where we were, which is be presentable, be nationalistic, et cetera, to like, now he’s dressing in all black with a bunch of thugs, throwing up Hitler salutes, screaming the n-word, and not in like a fun, … You know, sometimes I do that in, like a half joking way. It’s edgy! It’s like edge lord humour. We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. And screaming about the “in-word this” and “get the fuck out!” Like, I’m sorry, I don’t know who that’s supposed to convince. Who is that supposed to win over other than other extreme young men?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re trying to win over other extreme young men! We’re trying to recruit them. [chuckling] That’s kind of the idea.

 

We present ourselves in a militant way because we want to recruit young White men with a militant attitude. We want to recruit tough young men that are willing to make sacrifices, that are willing to take risks, because we’re trying to build a core of revolutionaries. Those are the kinds of people that are revolutionaries.

 

And a lot of people in the public do like us and sympathize with us, but we know that they’re not going to come and join us because joining us is kind of intimidating. It’s scary, it’s commitment.

 

So we have a lot of passive supporters in the community that I think are glad to see militant young White men standing up for them. And they’ll be much happier to see us when there’s a thousand, and they’ll be much, way more happy to see us when there’s 10,000. The bigger we get, the more they’ll love us.

 

But we are trying to appeal to the men that are going to come and be part of that first thousand and then be part of that first 10,000. And those people, yeah, they’re going to have, like, they’re not going to be your average normie. They’re going to be people that are, have a so-called “extreme personality”, I guess, in some way, shape or form. We need people that are willing to become revolutionaries, that’s the only way we’re going to get there.

 

So, yes, the way we dress in black and we look kind of staunch and intimidating and give off a militant aura, because we’re trying to attract those people.

 

And also we’re trying to show that we’re serious, that we mean business. We don’t want fat nerds! We don’t want losers! We don’t want people that are soft. We don’t want people that are compromising. We want people that want to come and embrace an uncompromising, revolutionary message.

 

So that’s the logic. I don’t know if Tom wants to comment on that or if we should just keep watching.

 

Thomas Sewell: What he’s most upset about, in my opinion, in this segment, which I think a lot of people in our wider movement, I mean, this kind of rhetoric reminds me of Thuletide, for example. There’s a lot of people in the wider movement that are really upset with how we’re going about our activism and how we’re going about our optics.

 

And the main complaint I’ve heard, which he hasn’t said the words exactly, but they say it like this usually:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

That’s usually how they say it:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

I’ve heard this from all sorts of Liberal Party circles, you know, people that are quite sympathetic to us, you know, conservatives, conservative boomers.

 

And then:

 

“They don’t understand. They just don’t get it. You’re dressing up like the enemy. Why are you dressing up like the enemy? Why are you making yourself out to be like the enemy? !”

 

Just can’t conceive it.

 

And the reason why they can’t conceive it is because they’re collaborating with the enemy. They don’t participate strictly in the distinction. Nick Fuentes and his strategy and all the other Entriest type strategies, they want to be part of the system. They’ll wear a suit and a tie. They’ll pretend to be a lawyer, or they’ll pretend to be part of the political class, the Liberal political class. They’re larping as the people in power to try to fool the public into thinking that:

 

“We’re the same as the people in power, just with a little bit more common sense. And that’s how we’re going to get legitimacy.”

 

And it’s foolish! Because they’re never going to get legitimacy because they’re not puppets! The only people that have legitimacy within the Liberal order are put there by the men behind the curtain. And they’re never going to put someone like Nick Fuentes there.

 

So the Entriest policy, although it can make some initial progress and it can certainly create some compromised halfway positions towards where we want to go, it can never go all the way that we need to go! And he exposes himself as not even believing in wanting to go all the way. And he’s compromising himself because of this. He says something like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know much about Australia, but good luck to them! They’re never going to make Australia White!”

 

It’s like, we are going to make Australia White. That’s a fact. We are. It’s an absolute, undeniable, 100% fact! We have the numbers, we have the people. We’re not going to be swamped by billions of nons. That’s just not going to happen, because it’s one or the other. And we’re the last stand of the antipodean in the south. We’re going to make that stand and we’re going to be successful in that stand. And we have the faith. We have the belief in that.

 

So, yeah, we are dressing up as the enemy. We are. And that’s on purpose. It’s to create contrast, it’s to create distinction. And in time, right now, people aren’t angry enough. They should be much more angry than they are, especially with what’s going on in Germany and what’s going on in England. But even in America and Australia, it’s the same nonsense! It’s the same crap going on. You know, it’s police knocking on people’s doors for having the wrong political opinions.

 

And what’s going to happen over time is, and it’s already happening in real time, is people are losing faith in the establishment! They’re losing faith in the system and its institutions. And they’re going from losing faith in this system and its institutions into feeling like the system and its institutions are the enemy!

 

And then the enemy, or the system, is stupid enough to point out at 20 dudes in black block and say:

 

“That’s the enemy. That’s the enemy. These people are the enemy. They’re the enemy within. They’re the problem. Look at these evil Nazis! They’re the number one enemy. They’re the most toxic form of politics. They’re the most horrible, evil enemy to ever exist! These 20 men, or these 30 men, or these 50, or these 70!”

 

Or wherever it goes from there, and they’re stupid enough to do that. And what they fail to realise is that the average Australian is starting to hate the government! The average Australian is really starting to feel like the government is their enemy.

 

And when the government points out that we are the legitimate, full, 100% enemy of the system, well, now the people know where to look for:

 

“So, wait, if the government is my enemy, and the government is saying these people are the enemy? Well, maybe I identify with these people!”

 

And that is why we’re dressing up as the enemy, because we are the enemy of the people that want to destroy the White race. That’s our enemy and we’re their enemy. It’s that clear!

 

[40:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s well said.

 

And you mentioned there, Australia. And Nick is giving a perspective as an outsider from America. He’s not really savvy with what’s happening in Australian social, political life. Right. What he probably doesn’t understand is Australians have a certain disdain for careerist commentary. Like, they want to see action. They want to see someone ruffling the feathers, someone sort of pushing boundaries. And Australians really value an underdog as well. You know, we have that kind of culture down here. And are you saying, Tom, that maybe Fuentes is only really interested in remaining a careerist political commentator who wants to remain within the boundaries of the existing system, that maybe he’s trying to avoid that kind of more revolutionary, radical perspective and that’s why he’s kind of not really into the activism? Is that what you’re saying?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! I think that there’s two main types of far-Right people, if you want to describe them as that there are revolutionaries and there are reformers.

 

And I think he’s made it very clear that he’s a reformer. He wants reform. He wants Trump to take off the tie and crack the whip. He wants Trump to get the job done, build the wall, deport some of the Mexicans, or a couple million of them. But he doesn’t want a complete revolution. He doesn’t want a complete change in the entire system:

 

“The system is relatively good. There’s just a bit too many jews in power, and we can just make these kind of meantime reforms and go back to 1990.”

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing, he says that he does want a revolution. Like when he talked, like, on this same stream, I watched a little bit of it, and he said some really good things earlier in the stream about how he called himself a White supremacist. He said:

 

“He doesn’t care what brown people have to say about White genocide, that our race is being genocided and we’re going to be angry about it and we’re going to do something about it and we’ll let when we’ve gone too far. But we’re nowhere near going too far at this point.”

 

And a lot of good rhetoric.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s interesting because according to him we’re going too far. So he’s gonna let us, …

 

Joel Davis: What he’s having an issue with is the street activism.

 

But it’s like, that’s the thing. It’s like you want to have a politics with revolutionary outcomes, but then you want to go about it like a conservative, like you want to go about it where you wear the suit and the tie and let’s infiltrate the system and let’s change hearts and minds and like you’re not going to get revolutionary outcomes from conservative strategies.

 

Now when we look at, when we take a survey of the land and we look at the university educated, you know, upper middle class types, people who get law degrees, people who work in law enforcement, people who work in politics, these are the hardest people to get to take on a revolutionary agenda because they have the most to lose from throwing their lot in with any kind of radical movement. Because their entire livelihood, their entire career could be crumbled in one instant through association to anyone who is too radical being made public.

 

So we looked at that and we said:

 

“Okay, trying to build on that foundation is going to be a house built on sand.”

 

Because all of these people are basically being selected into all of these positions through their capacity for risk avoidance. And their entire livelihoods are going to be built around that foundation.

 

[44:01]

 

So then we go and look at, okay, well then we’ve got this demographic of White working class tradesmen, skilled labourers and so on. Guys who own their own businesses, guys who work in small businesses, guys that are masculine, guys that are into fitness, guys that have a militant attitude, they have an aggression that are generally the most racist demographic in Australian society, and the most free! Because they don’t work in industries where their livelihoods could necessarily be destroyed by association to a radical political movement. And we go:

 

“Well, we could recruit from that demographic of disaffected young men who are looking at society and saying, ‘It’s going to cost me a million dollars to buy a house in an average suburb. I want to get married, I want to have kids, I want my kids to go to good schools, I want to be able to live in a decent home. And now I’m basically going to be mortgaged up to the shithouse for the rest of my life, enslaved to jews to live in a shitty suburb surrounded by Indians, send my kids to a school where the jews are going to teach them to become trannies. This is fucking unacceptable! This is fucking unacceptable! I’m going to do something about it. I’m going to go and join these boys’!”

 

There are hundreds of thousands if not millions of young White men in that demographic who are going to love our message and who already do love our message! We could build a massive, massive movement of young men that will have money, that will be able to put their bodies in the street and extract a lot of strength from the people. And this is similar to if you read Mein Kampf. When Hitler kind of looked at the conservative movement of his day and the middle class and the petty bourgeois class of his day, he analyzed them and said:

 

“You know what? It’s going to be difficult for us to draw much strength from these people because they’re not doing so bad within the system. The system is offering them kind of positions but at the same time their mentality is fundamentally reformist. Their mentality is fundamentally servile to the establishment. We’re going to have to go and draw our strength from the class below them, and we’re going to have to appeal to them and build them into a large movement and then through strength in numbers then impose ourselves upon the political system with a more revolutionary kind of politics than what the conservacucks are going to be offering.”

 

Which is all conservatism is a compromise with the enemy. So we are trying to reach into the revolutionary demographic in Australian society and build upon that foundation. And yeah, they might be a little bit more rough around the edges. Yeah they might not have as refined sensibilities and so on, but they are ultimately going to be providing the raw manpower and the raw resources to actually put together a proper White nationalist political movement.

 

And then once we have a White nationalist political movement of a sufficient size, then we will have the ability to go and get those higher quality types, the people with the law degrees, the guys that are working in politics, the guys that are of that higher echelon of society and say:

 

“Hey, we’ve already got an established party here, we’ve got an established organisation, we’ve got money, we’ve got chapters in every single town in every major city. We’ve got guys everywhere. We’ve got resources. We can fund you, we can support you. Come and join us. It doesn’t matter if they know that you’re a Nazi because we can fucking support you! The movement can support you don’t need the system anymore to operate.”

 

And then we have a chance at actually winning. Because right now our enemies control the money. Our enemies control all the positions of influence. And everyone that’s going in there trying to infiltrate the system has to play by the rules of the enemy. And so they’re all totally ineffective!

 

I know plenty of guys that have infiltrated that are staffers in all of these political parties across the Australian Right. Guys that have branch stacked and become branch presidents within the Liberal Party, which is our biggest conservative Party, guys that have been staffers for major Right-wing politicians and so on. Whenever I talk to them about what’s going on inside the party and they give me the inside baseball, they tell me about what’s happening. And their role in what’s happening is zero! They just have to kind of go with the flow. They don’t actually have any agency. They’re in there. They’re talking to the movers and shakers. They’re talking to the leaders of the Australian conservative movement.

 

But ultimately they’re having basically zero effect in there! And they’ve been in there the whole time. White nationalists have been infiltrating the Australian conservative movement for decades and getting themselves in there.

 

And ultimately they have been able to do nothing to affect the kind of winds of change. And that’s because the jews and the property developers and the business lobby and all of these powerful interests that control the conservative movement are the ones that have the money! They’re the ones that are ultimately calling the shots.

 

So until we are able to raise our own resources from an alternative base, from a base that comes from the people, from the White Australian people, rather than coming top down from these bourgeois elites that don’t give a fuck about their country or that only care about their economic interests or these jews that have their own agenda or whatever, we’re not going to get anywhere. We’re not going to fucking get anywhere because they’re our fucking enemies! They’re our political enemies. They have no interest in struggling or supporting anyone who wants to struggle on behalf of securing a future for White Australian people. White Australian families, White Australian children. And that’s all we care about! That’s the only reason we are involved in this shit!

 

[49:28]

 

So we have no choice but to go and build from basically square one. I’ve surveyed the whole Australian political system. There’s no fucking entry points! We have to go basically from scratch. And it’s kind of crude. We have to basically dress in black and walk in the streets. All the guys are in balaclavas because only like 15 of us are even willing to show our face. We’re trying to conceal them from getting doxxed, which we have done relatively successfully. But we’re still putting ourselves out there in the street to say:

 

“Hey, there’s someone that’s fucking fighting! There’s someone that’s willing to put boys together, join us!”

 

And boys are joining us. Every week we get more and more recruits. The speed of recruitment has only been increasing all year. Every time we do one of these street actions, we get recruits.

 

Thomas Sewell: We had three more recruits in Melbourne just tonight.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. We are accumulating manpower faster and faster and faster, week on week. We’re putting the message out. We’re putting ourselves out there.

 

A lot of people in Australia know who we are, and a lot of people are very supportive. We’ve done street marches down the street and all over the country now, and lots of positive responses from the public. People tooting the horns, throwing romans out the window, grandmas coming over and saying words of encouragement. We get just as much positive reinforcement from the public as negative, if not more positive reinforcement in our recent activism.

 

So there’s a lot of sympathy in the community. People see us on the news all the time. They know who we are and they like us. And maybe there’s a distinction between the American mentality and the Australian mentality. The Americans, they’ve got their own kind of White nationalist street movement scene. This isn’t me throwing shade at them, but probably because of how big America is and how complex American politics are, they aren’t as able as we are to present themselves to the public in a strong way and get the whole political system to kind of react to them like we can. Because Australia’s got nothing going on. It’s a dead political scene. Politics is fucking boring! There’s barely anything happening on the news.

 

So when we do something, it’s a big deal. You know, we’re an established brand here, unlike these American groups. And so we’re able to get a certain kind of response from the public that I think is different than the American groups can.

 

And the thing is, as well, in America, people have a lot of hope in Trump. And in America, people are very concerned with the conservative movement and the Republican Party. And America is a very politicised country. People are very concerned about conservative versus liberal and all this shit in America. In Australia, we live in a very de-politicised society. The average person doesn’t really give a fuck about politics, doesn’t have very strong opinions either way. They have social opinions. They have opinions on race, but they don’t have opinions that are very political, if that makes sense. People are very casually racist. They’ve got casual social opinions about feminism or gays or whatever. It isn’t really kind of contextualised through which party you support and which political leaders you like. Pretty much all the major politicians are just hated by everyone. No one is particularly passionate in support of any of them. No one particularly cares about politics in Australia, quite frankly. It’s a much more minor aspect of our society than in the United States.

 

So part of our job as well, is to do something fucking interesting that someone will care about. In America, you’ve got a pre-existing political system to kind of interface with. The Groypers can sit on the edge of the Trump movement and be relevant. If we tried to sit on the edge of the Australian Right-wing, well, no one’s fucking paying attention to the Right-wing politics anyway. It’s a bunch of boomers that watch cable news. But no one under the age of 50 is even really fucking paying attention. So no one would care. There’s no market there. We have to basically be provocative in order to even get anyone to look at us in the first place.

 

That’s another thing to take into consideration. Why in Australia, it’s like, you’ve got this lame conservative movement and then nothing, and then a bunch of Nazis. In America, you’ve got all these different positions on the Right-wing political spectrum that are being occupied by different actors. We just don’t really have that.

 

So, yeah, like Australia, more one dimensional than American politics, frankly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good spiel. Are we ever going to get through this video? [chuckling]

 

Nick Fuentes: You know, who is that supposed to win over? Is that going to win over elite people? Is that going to win over high IQ people? Is that going to earn the support of any large number of people? Who is that actually attractive to? Who sees an expression like that, which is very negative and very vulgar and very angry and foreign, and say:

“I want to be a part of that! I want to go stand outside in the street in a costume, yelling racial hatred and abuse because of immigration or something.”

So I think it’s just stupid! I’ve said that for years. It’s stupid when Patriot Front does it’s stupid. When Blood Tribe does it’s stupid. When the Alt-Right did it. You know, NSM. And all those TRS, all those guys. It’s just dumb. Like, I don’t believe in larping. I’m American, and I don’t hate anybody. You know, I’m a normal White American. I want this to be a majority White country.

And I’m also intelligent. Like, I’m not an unpleasant coarse person! And these guys, they’ll act like they’re soldiers. I don’t know. Has Joel Davis ever been in a war? You know, you think because you train combat sports that now you’re gonna be like a soldier. They act like they’re veterans. They go march around, yell slurs at people, and then they go in a bar and they act like they just fought a battle.

 

[55:40]

 

Blair Cottrell: I used to agree with this kind of take. This is surreal to me because a few years ago, I was saying similar stuff to this. I was against larping, and I thought that:

 

“What are they doing, these activists the boys, NSN, no one’s ever going to agree with that this is not going to work. Aahh!”

 

I was doing that as well. But I remembered something. I remembered something that Tom told me. Tom told me:

 

“You’ve got to let a thousand flowers blossom.”

 

Right? And I can’t remember where he got that from or whether he. It came to him as a result of his own thinking. Mao?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s an ancient quote. I think Mao copied it from a Greek philosopher.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And I realised that you also need a gang. You need a gang that’s going to back you up, someone that you can put faith in. You need a community.

 

And that’s the thing about us as boys down here in Australia, whether we’re involved in activism or not, we’re all part of that gang, because there’s not many of us down here, and we’re all mates. We know each other, we eat together, we train together, and we back each other up regardless of what it is we’re doing. And we’re all contributing to forging a popular counterculture. I think:

 

“All great movements must be popular movements.”

 

Hitler said. And I can feel that the popularity of nationalism, or even National Socialism is growing, not just in Australia, but around the world. And it’s growing partly as a result of the activism the guys have been doing down here. It’s been making the regular Australian person think that:

 

“Oh, maybe these slogans and catchphrases aren’t that bad.”

 

They smile about it, they laugh about it, they talk about it on job sites. And they are being primed to support the counterculture that is forging, is coming together before our eyes. Right?

 

So I used to believe what Nick believed. I used to say the same stuff he was saying, but I was just getting the same nonsense from the same bullshit, established political forces. And I realised that, as you guys have probably articulated already, you can’t always play by the rules of the establishment or be interested in some sort of careerist position within the parameters and boundaries where the establishment will allow you to operate. That’s too frustrating for me, especially down here in Australia.

 

And I like Nick. I think Nicks, all right. And I like the fact that he has a big viewership. I like anyone who makes our politics more popular because it contributes to the growth of the counterculture throughout majority White nations, extension colonies of Europe and so forth. Right?

 

So that’s my primary concern. I think becoming more popular is at the heart of what we’re doing. And every bit of political activism, stream, commentary, organisation, whatever we’re doing, it’s all contributing in some small way to growing our counterculture, growing the popularity of our counterculture. And look, the recruitment drive has been great. Like, the results will speak for themselves. This is the thing. Even if you want to stay on the side of Fuentes and say:

 

“Yeah, the activism is bullshit! These guys are larpers! We don’t need that. Whatever. What we need to do is just keep streaming and working within the parameters of the current political establishment, and eventually we’ll get somewhere!”

 

Whatever. In a few years time, you’re going to see which one of those approaches is producing the right kind of result. Right? And I don’t think you’re going to see much change, …

 

Joel Davis: Every revolutionary movement starts as larping. You know, there was a time at which Vladimir Lenin was standing in a room with a bunch of like 50 communists or 50 Bolsheviks or whatever, taking themselves really seriously.

 

And I think there was actually a quote once where someone met Vladimir Lenin at a party in Germany somewhere when he was exiled from Russia. And it was like some little Communist Party. That’s kind of funny saying communist. It was like a party, like an actual party, not a political party full of communists. And someone went up and said:

 

“Oh, hello, Vladimir.”

 

And he’s:

 

“Hi, I’m Vladimir Lenin, the future leader of the Russian Revolution.”

 

And he’s kind of laughed, but it was true! But at that time, he just had like this little journal about communist theory that, like, 45 guys were reading and a group of larpers, and they were not even in their actual country. They were exiled to Germany. Ten years later, he leads the Russian Revolution, and now he’s like the dictator of the Soviet Union, and he’s got a Red Army with millions of men, and now he’s done it! You’re larping until you’re not.

 

You know, at one point, when Adolf Hitler joined up with the NSDAP and they had their first meeting, they’re in the beer hall, there’s, like 90 of them. And there’s some guy taking minutes and they’re taking themselves very seriously:

 

“And this is how we’re going to save Germany!”

 

And there’s 90 guys at the pub. Fast forward yourself, you know, 15 years or less. Less like twelve years, ten years. There’s a Nuremberg rally with millions of guys! So everything’s larping until it isn’t!

 

So this idea, …

 

[1:01:01]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So what creates that, though? What makes the larp real?

 

Joel Davis: To become worthy of being taken seriously by anyone.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the force, Joel? What’s the force? And, Tom, you can answer this, too. What is the force that starts making the larp real, that starts giving the larp real power? What is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Inspiration. It’s spirit. It’s spiritual inspiration. Yeah. And that’s what you can’t measure. So Nick can complain about our strategy, and he can’t conceive what we’re doing, and why are we doing it. Because he’s not really inspiring anyone. He’s just got a team of consumers. His audience just simply consume, whereas our audience, we don’t really want them to just consume. We’re trying to get them to be politically mobile. We want them to be activists like us. And Hitler’s success, and even the American Revolutionary success came from inspiration. And Nick wants to say that he’s an American. He says:

 

“I’m an American, so this Australian stuff isn’t really relevant to me.”

 

Well, what about the American Revolution? Is that relevant to Nick Fuentes? Because the American Revolutionaries had uniforms. The American Revolutionaries larped. The American Revolutionaries weren’t attracting the majority of the society at the beginning. There was only a very small percentage of the American colonies of the population that actually supported the American Revolutionaries. But they didn’t need 51%. They just needed the men that had the strength and the courage. And that’s the most important people that you need to recruit and attract and have sympathize with your message. The politically mobile people, the people that will take politics to its nth degree.

 

So we’re inspiring people. And that’s not even really measurable right now in the boots we have on the ground, because what we’ve done is we’re setting ourselves up as a brand. We’re setting, you know, Joel called it earlier in the stream, he called it. What was it like? Not Right-wing drama. But you said it was, not theatre, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Performance art.

 

Thomas Sewell: Performance art! Yes. So if we’re going to describe it as that, it allows people to see the distinction. It allows the average person on the street, like, we don’t even need the banner anymore. We don’t even need a banner. We don’t even need to bring a flag. When people see us now, when they see us in formation, they immediately know what side they’re on. Does that make sense? They immediately, …

 

Joel Davis: We bring the banner to make a statement. We don’t have to bring the banner to identify who we are the banner is why we are there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. When people see us now, they either smile or they’re afraid or they are a communist or something.

 

But that’s really it. There’s like, the traitors, the lukewarm and the fighters. And when the fighters, when the people that care about Australia, when they see us, even if they’re not physical fighters, they’re just moral fighters. When the moral fighters, when they see us, they smile. They say:

 

“Good on your boys!”

 

They wave at us. Sometimes they even throw Roman salutes at us. And they’re not necessarily Nazis. They don’t necessarily even know anything about Hitler, anything about World War Two. They just know how fucked up society is! And they know that we’re the only ones in the country actually standing up to it! Really properly, just being like, fuck this! [chuckling] We’re 100% against all this. We’re standing up for it.

 

And that’s why people are putting their trust in us that’s beyond the metrics of the normal political system. That’s beyond the Liberal political system. The trust they have in us is on a different level.

 

Blair Cottrell: Just to play contrarian, because some people might be thinking this, I think. Do you think you run the risk of just becoming a spectacle or object of amusement for these people who are smiling at you but who never intend to join? Do you think there’s the risk of that?

 

Joel Davis: A lot of people don’t intend to join. Because that’s the thing. Like, we don’t need everyone. Like, we want to have lots of supporters. Like, it’s not just about whether you join or don’t join. There’s kind of two tiers. There’s, like, building the radical group of people that actually join, obviously. But then there’s the effect on the wider community. And that was what I thought was so good about the Fuck Off, We’re Full rally that we did. I read through the comments. There was one upload of it on TikTok that got, like, nearly a million views just on that one upload until it was taken down of that rally. And the comments were pretty much all positive.

 

And there was a lot of people commenting in there that were quite clearly just normal conservative types. Like, they weren’t, like, full on “the Holocaust was fake! Hitler’s awesome!” type people. There were just a normal Right-wing people that just don’t like immigration. And they were like:

 

“This is awesome! How good is someone standing up against it?”

 

And then people were like:

 

“Oh, but they’re Nazis!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, they’re not Nazis! You know, they’re just good, like, patriots or whatever!”

 

This kind of thing. [chuckling] And it was quite interesting because we are Nazis. And we put ourselves forward in balaclavas and black, and we’re all intimidating, yet still we’re able to solicit the sympathy of normal Right-wing White people, which is perfect when you can marry those two things together. And that’s kind of our objective. Our objective is to try and get normal Right-wing White people or Right leaning White people, patriotic leaning White people, to start looking at us and sympathizing with us. Because convincing 50% of Australians that National Socialism is good, theoretically, that’s never going to happen.

 

But if we can show them National Socialism in practice by actually putting bodies in the street, in a way that’s we’re standing up for them against the people that they know they don’t like, against things they don’t like the trans people, grooming of children and these immigrants pouring into the country and so on. And they go:

 

“Wait a second. Like, these guys are obviously the good guys in this arrangement!”

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you say, Tom, that’s what you hear most from the women Tom? Is that what you said?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve heard that thousands of times over the past two or three years. From women, specifically women. I don’t really hear it ever from men, but from women. That is what they keep saying in person and online. That is what they keep saying. That is something that is echoing, constantly echoing! Every time we do a rally, every time we do a demonstration, every time we cross paths with a woman that’s sympathetic to us. They say these words:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s curious, because in our Mein Kampf, Hitler writes that the quality of a movement, that is to say, whether or not it’s effective, can be measured by how many women are supportive of it. That if the women don’t like it’s never going to be popular, it’s never going to be good, it’s never going to be effective.

 

So, yeah, it’s curious. And I think what he meant by that is, obviously that the regular people are of a feminine predisposition. So if you want to appeal to regular people, then you have to appeal to the feminine element within people. I think that’s what he was getting at.

 

But what he’s basically written down there is, if only men are interested in your politics, you need to rework it, you need to simplify it. You need to make it palpable to the feminine instinct. Then you’ll become popular, because then you’ll appeal to the masses. Right?

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing about when the kind of militant presentation and the show of strength, that’s kind of what part of that is about. It’s kind of like sexy. It’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be refined. It can’t be vulgar. It must be refined strength. And that’s, like, something that I think in recent years, you guys have really gotten down pat.

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s something that we definitely want to improve. I mean, we’re just starting out.

 

I mean, look at the SS uniformity now. That’s sexy! When a man walked into the bar in 1932, Munich, wearing his SS uniform, the girls are like, “hmmm!” when he walks in because that’s a man. That’s a sexy man in uniform right there. And that’s probably part of the reason why the women were going crazy for the Nazis and why they’re off the front row throwing Romans and clapping for Hitler and why women voted. I think women actually outvoted men for the Nazis in the election. Because they were like:

 

“Yeah, these are some men! These are some proper sexy men coming bringing change to Germany!”

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the second most common thing that I hear from the women. They don’t necessarily say “sexy”, although there is a few women that are in a different age bracket that probably shouldn’t be saying that to us that do. But and they know who they are. That’s slightly problematic, but anyway.

 

The second most common thing that I hear, is they say:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

They just simply say that:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

That’s what they say.

 

So the first most common thing that I hear is:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

And the second most common thing that they say is:

 

“Here are some men. Finally, some men!”

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be a sad reality.

 

Thomas Sewell: Nick would never understand that. Nick would never understand that.

 

Blair Cottrell: But it must be a pretty, … Imagine being a woman in this world. And you once knew what men were. I mean, I suppose this is women like of the older generations. They once were surrounded by men, and now it’s like they’re all gone!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And in their place, there’s this hollowed out shell of men that doesn’t really feel masculine, and so they feel, … It must be a scary reality for women to feel like within their own nation, they don’t have men looking after them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it’s the Albaneses, the Kevin Rudds the Scomos. These are all husbands. They’re all husbands. They would be too afraid to upset a mouse. Yeah, they’re just husbands. They’re housebound. They do as they’re told. They pee sitting down. They pee sitting down!

 

Blair Cottrell: House negroes! Not like us field negroes! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, we’re wignats. You know? We’re wignats, as Nick puts it. You know, it’s like we don’t care about the establishment. We don’t care what it thinks. The establishment has lost, has broke the social contract. They have broken the social contract! They don’t deserve respect. They don’t deserve us larping as them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Can someone clarify for me? Can someone clarify what, … I think I know, but probably an embarrassing question. What is a “wignat”? What is that? Because Nick called me a wignat.

 

Joel Davis: Wigger Nationalists. So a wigger is a White nigger.

 

And so it was a term that was basically created to attack, quote, unquote, “trailer trash nationalism” in America, where guys are showing up fat, covered in tattoos, waving swastika flags, like:

 

“Yeah, fuck niggers!”

 

And people would say:

 

“Oh, like, wigger nationalism!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh no!

 

Joel Davis: But it’s, like, really inaccurate because, I mean, Blair isn’t really a wigger, is he? , …

 

Blair Cottrell: I would like to think that I’m not. But I find that curious because, …

 

Joel Davis: Define basically anyone who is, too, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I’m the personification of the racist Australian! And I didn’t even know what “wignat” was. So that might be some perspective for Nick to take on board. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

[1:12:43]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I don’t know. It’s just, again, it’s applying Americanisms to Australia. But also, I would say us showing up in black, I think we look cool! I think looking cool, … Blair talks about this. That looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics. Because it’s about aesthetics. It’s about, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately, it’s true.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And I remember when the boys did, because I was in Melbourne at the time, when the boys did the Destroy Pedos rally, and they were they showed up, they gate crashed the feminist versus tranny protest kind of clash last year. I remember you saying:

 

“I wasn’t so sure about this whole project that you guys have started, but this sold me because you guys look cool.”

 

And they’re showing them on the news, walking around, you know, muscly, in the black, throwing the Roman back when we could still throw Romans and it was still legal. And they did. They looked objectively cool. Like, the news started, like, blurring out their arms, because those muscly Roman arms were just too good aesthetics, the jews were getting too offended. [chuckling] But it looked fucking cool!

 

And that’s the thing you could say:

 

“Oh, does that appeal to everyone?”

 

Yeah, but, like, everything, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It almost does. One. One of the core components of looking cool is just being fit. You know, just being fit makes you look cool. It makes you look good in anything you wear. So that in itself, … If you’re in a individual sense or on a private basis, if you’re dedicating, you know, an hour or two a day to bodybuilding, fight training, cardiovascular activity, and you’re actually getting fit. What you’re doing there is almost using your time in such a way where you’re on an individual basis contributing to the broader collective, because when you do show up to events, you’re going to look good, and as a result, you’re going to make the collective look better, and then more people are going to want to join it. That’s pretty simple stuff.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, it’s important to look cool. I think we pull off looking cool.

 

I mean, I’ve seen our clips and pictures of us getting used by nationalists all over the world. People seem to really, really like us all over the global scene, including a lot of Americans. We seem to appeal to a lot of Americans. Our largest audience for this show is American. We got more Americans than Australians watching, by my metric, by my counting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Which demonstrates that there’s obviously an appeal. This show has some sort of appeal to an American audience. So maybe there’s something to learn from us?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, exactly. And I agree. Sometimes a little bit more discipline would be good. Like, as we get bigger, we will probably want to refine it and make it a little bit more disciplined, a little bit more formal as it matures and we have more manpower and so on to convey, like, a deeper seriousness.

 

But in a lot of respects, what will create the seriousness of the movement is just the sheer quantity. Like, if we’re doing the same thing we’re doing now, but with way larger numbers, then Australia will have to take notice. Like, there’s a certain scale of people where if it’s 10,000 of us in the street doing what we do, that can’t be ignored! Like, it just simply can’t be ignored. People are going to have to take us seriously and what we represent seriously.

 

And so I said this on Twitter today, that I think the difficulty White nationalism has in appealing to the White masses isn’t necessarily anything inherent to the ideology. Like, White nationalism, I think, is inherently appealing. There’s a reason why White people used to all be White nationalists, because it’s obviously inherently appealing, because it’s an ideology built around what’s good for White people.

 

So if you’re a White person, why wouldn’t that appeal to you?

 

So there’s a lot of inherent appeal in the idea. The problem is that people have become so demoralised, and the idea has become so attacked and kind of sidelined that people don’t really believe in it as something viable.

 

Like, the common refrain that I get from so many people is not necessarily that it wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing if we had a White country or if we could send the brown people back, or if we could close the borders and so on. Most people, right of centre and even in the centre, you know, that ideal isn’t necessarily the worst idea to them, but what is:

 

“It’s so unrealistic. How are you going to go about doing that? I mean, let’s get real here!”

 

And so on. They don’t believe that it’s possible. They don’t believe that you could ever mobilise enough support, enough political will to actually pull it off. That’s the thing, holding people back, not the inherent notion of the idea. And people don’t want to throw their chips on the most controversial idea in society with, 20 other guys, with a dream.

 

But eventually, if we can grow to enough strength where we actually look serious, where we can be taken seriously due to our size, then all of a sudden, people have something to believe in:

 

“Wow, these guys are really growing. This is actually a movement!”

 

Now. All of a sudden, the idea of White nationalism isn’t just an abstract idea. Now it’s actually a real movement that is growing in your country of guys that look like you, that look like your brother, that look like your cousin, that look like you’re mate at work or look like your best friend, and they’re all in the street together, shoulder to shoulder.

 

And it’s like, what does that mean? Then all of a sudden, the people are going to be inspired.

 

Then all of a sudden, the discourse is going to change. And that can’t really be quantified. That’s, that comes down to the will, and it comes down to, its a spiritual thing, really. It’s not something that can be quantified in a series of rational arguments. But the monkey brain of:

 

“I have to conform with society because I don’t want to become some outcast of society and embrace this radically marginalised idea!”

 

All of a sudden, when it’s 10,000 men walking down the street, the monkey brain is going to shift and say:

 

“Well, this is actually something I can consider now!”

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Like, they did this one study where they got a control group and then another group, and they would show images on the screen, and there’d be, like, a shape. It was a blue shape. And they got everyone in the room other than the individual they were testing to all say it was green, and the individual, and it was blue, though. But they got everyone else to say it’s green.

 

And then they go to the guy who’s, like, not in on it and say:

 

“What colour is that shape?”

 

And a lot of the time they conformed, even though they can see that it’s blue. They say:

 

“It’s green.”

 

Because everyone else is saying it’s green:

 

“I guess it must be green, and I’m crazy! I don’t want to be the weirdo that says it’s blue!”

 

And then they have another group under different conditions. And what they found is that, like people are highly conformist, basically. People will literally call something green blue or blue green or whatever just to conform over something, something as goofy as that.

 

And that is happening on a mass scale on the issue of race. Like, everyone can see that there’s a racial problem. The average White person can feel it deep down inside, but they repress it. There has to be some kind of spiritual force that like, brings that racial feeling back up to the surface and tells them:

 

“Actually those feelings that you have deep down inside those are valid. There’s hundreds of thousands of other people, millions of other White people that feel exactly the same!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that’s why people smile? Do you think that’s why people are amused when they see someone who’s pointing out that the races aren’t equal or who’s representing some form of racial nationalism? People almost smile because there is some element to comedy that I don’t fully understand where the truth is actually funny, if you point out a truth that you’re not supposed to point out or notice because it might make people a little bit uncomfortable. What do you think, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I mean, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s got to be. It’s got to be like:

 

“Oh, wow!”

 

Yeah. It’s like:

 

“Oh, wow, the truth that we’re not supposed to see. He’s saying it. Oh, my God!”

 

It’s, like, really shocking! Maybe why people smile. Comedians understand this principle better than I do, but I know there’s a correlation between comedy and truth, and probably that’s why people are so amused by racism. Like, the younger generation, Zoomers*, they love racism! I’ve never met a generation that uses, like, derogatory slurs for certain races more than the Zoomers do, and they think it’s hilarious! Probably it’s hilarious to them, because these slurs usually based on some observable reality within certain races. And so they’re not entirely devoid of truth. Actually, they’re quite accurate in a lot of cases. [chuckling] And so the Zoomers find them genuinely amusing.

 

[* Generation Z (often shortened to Gen Z), also known as Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years, with the generation most frequently being defined as people born from 1997 to 2012. Most members of Generation Z are the children of younger Baby Boomers or Generation X. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I think people also smile at the shock factor. There’s a shock factor to go from living your daily life, contending with pajeets and everything else that’s going on and getting fatigue from the society that you’re living in, and then just randomly out of the blue for seemingly no reason at all, there’s just 50 Nazis marching down the street chanting “blood and honour!” And that just seems crazy on the surface level. But there’s value in the shock of that because it’s like a big wake up! It’s like a big shake up of the psyche.

 

And if someone just went into the letterbox, for example, and it was just this very, very common sense and reasonable diatribe about the nature of the economy and how it’s not doing too well, and the schools are getting a bit overcrowded and maybe we should look at reducing immigration to a more sustainable level. It’s not going to shock the psyche. They’re going to read it, someone’s going to rationalise it, but they’re not going to do anything about it.

 

And that’s because, I don’t really believe that the rational is that powerful at the moment. I think we’re in a very chaotic time where the rational seems to not work. I’m a very rational person. I’m obsessed with the rational. I’m obsessed with logic and truth and natural law. For some reason. I’m just obsessed. I’m built that way. And so being a White nationalist is so frustrating because the average person in society seems to not care about the truth!

 

They seem to not care about what’s rational and what’s reasonable. They don’t actually care. Nobody cares about that stuff. They care more about the football. And the football is irrational. Why are they all waving brown and yellow flags? Or why are they waving purple and yellow flags? These are irrational concepts. What the fuck has that purple, … It has no symbolic meaning. It’s not even local. So I talk to guys, you know, chippy [carpenter] at work, plumber at work. They say:

 

“Oh, what footy team do you go for?”

 

I go:

 

“Honestly, man, I don’t go for a footy team. What team do you go for?”

 

And they say:

 

“Oh, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Oh, you’re from Brisbane?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, I just like, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“What the fuck? You’re not even from Brisbane!”

 

It’s so irrational! But why do they like Brisbane Lions?:

 

“Oh, man, I like the lion, man. You know, I like lions. They had a fucking good team when I started, you know, watching the footy, or my uncle goes for them!”

 

It’s just so fucking irrational! If I was to go for a football team, I mean, I grew up in Balwyn*, you know, that, I would go for Balwyn Tigers or something. I would go for the local football team. That’s who I would go for!

 

[* Balwyn is a suburb of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 10 km east of Melbourne’s Central Business District, located within the City of Boroondara local government area. Balwyn recorded a population of 13, 495 at the 2021 census. The suburb’s post-European settlement character was initially agricultural with several large estates built around a small village centre. Since the early 20th century, farms and mansions gave way to suburban development as the population of Melbourne rapidly grew. Today Balwyn is almost entirely residential and one of Victoria’s most exclusive and affluent suburbs, regularly Ranking in the state’s top 10 most expensive suburbs. Wikipedia]

 

[1:24:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course, obviously.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, because that’s like, there’s guys that I worked with or guys that I went to school with that played for that team. So that’s who I would go for. That’s like a rational, but that’s like the minority.

 

So we’re living in an irrational time. Now. I can complain about that. I can seethe about that and go:

 

“Why is everyone so irrational?”

 

And pull all my hair out. Or I can maybe go:

 

“Okay, is this what Evola was talking about, riding the tiger?”

 

Like, yeah, it’s like, it’s not a rational situation. And if the irrational is so powerful right now, then maybe need to shock people with the irrational!

 

And I think there’s enough people doing the rational, and I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere. I think we need the dramatisation. I think we need the irrational. We need to evoke emotion! I think emotion in this time is far more in the chaos of everything that’s going on, it’s the only way to really speak to people.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I think what you represent is rational. So it’s almost like people are so irrational that the rational is shocking to them.

 

Joel Davis: And it’s like you can rationally describe, … I’ve spoken to so many people who rationally understand it’s the jews and the Holocaust was fake and Hitler’s been unfairly demonised, and the White race is being genocided, but they’re fucking pussies!

 

Thomas Sewell: They won’t do anything.

 

Joel Davis: They will never do anything because they’re fucking pussies! The Whiteman needs to go back some fucking balls! The Whiteman needs to go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to fucking do something about it. We’re going to fight back!”

 

Like, I spent the last couple days arguing in a Twitter space with a lot of these people who are red pilled on all the relevant subjects, but they don’t think that it’s possible for the Whiteman to take back his country, our countries. They don’t think that the Whiteman is capable of actually building a political movement on the basis of defending himself. They don’t think that! They have no belief in us. And every single guy in those, I mean, you can’t see people in Twitter Spaces, but every single guy who has that opinion, their voices were all the most piss weak, low testosterone voices in the Twitter space.

 

And then the guys that come in the Twitter space with a bit of fucking balls that you can hear, like, a bit of aggression in their voice, they’re all like:

 

“Fuck, yeah, I agree with you, Joel. Hail Hitler! Fuck these cucks!”

 

Like [Tom, [chuckling] ] so that’s ultimately what it comes down to. When Fuentes says:

 

“Are we going to be attracting the high IQ guys with our message, with our meathead strategy?”

 

I’m pretty high IQ. You know, its objectively true that I have a high IQ, but I’m going to go and hang out with the so-called meatheads, right? Because the meatheads have some fucking balls and they’re going to try and do something! I spent years trying to try to wrangle the high IQ intellectual types into doing anything, and you can’t!

 

Blair Cottrell: No.

 

Joel Davis: Because they have such a high IQ that they can rationalise everything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re too smart for that. They’re too smart for everything.

 

Joel Davis: Nothing will work! High IQ people are:

 

“Nothing will work!”

 

With all the reasons why nothing can ever work. Why:

 

“That doesn’t make sense and this won’t work. And you can’t do this!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And because faith, faith transcends reason.

 

Joel Davis: I’d rather have guys who go:

 

“Yeah, Joel, fuck yeah. Hail Hitler!”

 

And actually does something that I tell them to do because they’re like:

 

“All right, I believe in you seem like a Whiteman who’s smart and knows what you’re talking about. I’m gonna fucking do what you say!”

 

I’d much rather that, to be honest, because that person is gonna actually do something. They’re gonna actually put some kind of will into the world, put some chest into the world and actually take the fight to the enemy in some way. And if we can build thousands and thousands and tens of thousands and so on, and men like that that are willing to fight and sacrifice and put in the fucking work to build a political movement, to force a political movement into existence that actually stands for our race, now we’ve got a fucking fighting chance! Now we’ve got actually someone fighting in the corner of the Aryan and ready to actually take on the system, which we currently don’t have.

 

[1:28:08]

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with being smart is its hard to really believe anything when you’re smart.

 

And so thank God that the majority of people aren’t smart because then it would be really hard to manage them because the majority of people believe things really easily. But Joel, I think you’re a pretty, like unique blend of someone who’s quite intelligent, but you’re also capable of believing and dedicating yourself to something. Right? That’s a good combination.

 

You brought up the footy, Tom. What do you guys think of that Aboriginal spokesperson who said that:

 

“‘Welcome to Country’* has been happening for 250,000 years!”

 

So apparently the abos have been around since, …

 

[* A Welcome to Country is a ritual or formal ceremony performed as a land acknowledgement at many events held in Australia. It is an event intended to highlight the cultural significance of the surrounding area to the descendants of a particular Aboriginal clan or language group who were recognised as the original human inhabitants of the area. For the Welcome to be recognised as official, it must be performed by a recognised elder of the group. Welcomes to Country are sometimes accompanied by traditional smoking ceremonies, music or dance. Where an elder is not available to perform the welcome, or there is not a recognised traditional owner, an Acknowledgement of Country may be offered instead. Since 2008, when it was made on the day before Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the Apology to Australia’s Indigenous peoples, a Welcome to Country has been incorporated into the ceremonial opening of the Parliament of Australia, an event which occurs after each federal election. Wikipedia]

 

Joel Davis: Shall I play the clip Blair? Do you want, you want me to play the clip?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure. It’s only a quick one. You can bring it up and find it if you got it ready.

 

Joel Davis: Give me a minute to pull it up. I’ll get it.

 

Thomas Sewell: [words unclear] Keep going. Keep doing it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just keep doing it. Like, never interrupt an enemy when they’re making a mistake.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, I’ve got a little strategy going on behind the scenes as to how I can, sort of how we can profit from this phenomenon. And I’ll explain what that is after we play the video. Yeah. 250,000 years Aboriginals have been doing it. Apparently they were here for 40,000 years before we got here. And then it was 50,000, then it was 70,000, and, 2000,000! But the meme remains, man! The mean remains true. Even if it is 250,000 years. 250,000 years, and invented a stick. Invented a stick! Yeah.

 

So I wouldn’t be proud of that! It’s like the longer you were here before we got here, the worse it looks for you. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, this is it. Let’s play it.

 

Brendan Kerin (part abo): It’s not a ceremony that we’ve invented to cater for White people. It’s a ceremony we’ve been doing for 250,000 years plus, BC. And the BC stands for Before Cook [Captain Cook]. Prior to colonisation you could get yourself into a lot of trouble for walking on someone else’s lands without being welcomed onto those lands.

 

Blair Cottrell: I really like seeing those guys. The head turns, the reactions, the kind of like:

 

“What? What did he just say?”

 

And even the crowd didn’t know how to react, really. They’re on the edge there. They’re teetering on the edge of actually reacting. And next time they hear that, they might react. Right?

 

So this tickled me a little bit because I come from an AFL family, right? My father and grandfather were playing and my cousin’s playing for Carlton now. So I thought:

 

“Oh, I don’t like this. The boys should have done something about this. I thought maybe I could work some Scorpio magic and make something happen behind the scenes. I thought, I’ll make a little clip. I won’t send it to my cousin directly because he’ll be able to show the boys within the AFL community and maybe, …”

 

I think the grand final’s on this weekend, isn’t it? Maybe at the grand final there’ll be some sort of reaction? Who knows, maybe next season, whatever.

 

But the idea is that he doesn’t see it directly from me because then he’ll feel like I’m pulling his arm and he won’t want to show anyone. But if he comes across it. Because I haven’t spoken to him in a few years. If he comes across it by himself, if I can get it sent around enough, he’d be like:

 

“Oh, this is my cousin! Look at this, boys. He’s talking about the footy!”

 

You know what I mean? So that was the that was the plan with that? We’ll see if it comes to fruition over time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I mean, that’s egregious. He basically put out a threat that, like:

 

“Oh, well, if we don’t welcome you, then people would get in a lot of trouble!”

 

Like, as if. Like what are you implying? He’s basically implying a very deep hostility there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: And what I always like to say to the Aboriginals is, if you’re not happy, if you don’t want to concede the loss, that, like:

 

“We won, you lost. We conquered. You got conquered. Suck shit!”

 

If you don’t like that equation and you want the country back, then let’s rematch! Let’s fucking rematch! Let’s go again! We can have it out again.

 

And this time the winner gets the country and the loser won’t exist anymore. It’s over! Like, it’s done! It’s finished! There’s not going to be any more toleration. And if we lose, fine, we could pack up and go back to England, or you can slaughter us all. I say that’s fair enough, because I don’t think you’re going to win! You’re going to have a bunch of abos and some, like, communist sympathizers or something, versus all of us that actually, every, like, Whiteman with some fucking balls and backbone. I think there’s only one winner in that situation. So I’m quite happy to do. To do a rematch.

 

And I know that they don’t! I know that they have absolutely no hope in hell and they know it, of winning a rematch. They’re just bitching and complaining! It’s a fucking victimocracy that we live in a complainocracy. And they know that the more and more that they bitch at the Whiteman, the more and more free shit they get given!

 

[1:33:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s what makes it even more cringe, the fact that these people that are paid to complain at these ceremonies, football games and stuff, they’re paid by the government to do that. They’re politically privileged, professional victims as I said in the video response that I posted to it. And that just makes it even more cringe, especially to the average Australian viewer who really doesn’t think much of the person who’s being put on a pedestal by the government. That’s not a real great way to get the average person in Australia to support your cause.

 

But, yeah, it ties into what Joel raised last time as “Aboriginal fatigue”. People are so fatigued by this. They’re so sick of it! Yeah, and Aboriginal fatigue is such a prominent thing now that even members for Parliament are speaking out against it. Even Pauline Hanson* stood up and said:

 

“Hey, let’s just ban this Welcome to Country stuff altogether.”

 

[* Pauline Hanson’s One Nation (PHON or ONP), also known as One Nation or One Nation Party, is a Right-wing populist political party in Australia. It is led by Pauline Hanson. One Nation was founded in 1997, by Member of Parliament Pauline Hanson and her advisors David Ettridge and David Oldfield after Hanson was disendorsed as a federal candidate for the Liberal Party of Australia. The disendorsement came before the 1996 federal election following comments she made about Indigenous Australians. Oldfield, a councillor on Manly Council in suburban Sydney and at one time an employee of Liberal minister Tony Abbott, was the organisational architect of the party. Hanson sat as an independent for one year before forming Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.]

 

Joel Davis: We don’t mean, like the Aboriginal asleep on a park bench at 10:00 in the morning because the bottle shop opens at 8:30 kind of fatigue. I mean the White fatigue are dealing with this shit!

 

But the thing is with this whole issue, it’s basically just a humiliation ritual, like, over and over and over and over again! And it’s the kind of thing where, like all of those football players, as you described, that are standing there and just taking it like every single one of them is a fucking pussy! Because you can see it on the faces of a lot of the White players that they don’t appreciate it, but then they’re on a million dollar contract and they don’t want to lose that million dollar contract. So they just have to stand there and cop it like good little goys.

 

When is someone going to show some balls and stand up? I thought Blair’s call to action was quite good. You know, if as soon as any White celebrity of any kind actually takes a stand against this, we’re going to be there behind them. Maybe [chuckling] they don’t want us behind him! Maybe to make it worse for them, but fuck it! We’ll be there behind him supporting them. Because I could see it being one of these cascade reactions where if one person is willing to be the first lemming to jump off the cliff, then there could be a pile on it. Could be quite a powerful move.

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think footy banners would be effective, too, something we could explore in the future. We did a footy banner back in the day and it caused huge [chuckling] upset and we were banned for life from the MCG! I don’t know how they intend to implement that ban. But I haven’t been back since. I haven’t tried to go back.

 

Joel Davis: Have you got an idea for a slogan.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, like something we could discuss in private, I guess. I probably already showed my cards too directly on that one. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I thought about would it be funny to streak the grand final? But the tickets are so expensive. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s best to wait to see if one of the players, or I even like a few of the players, walk off or do something. And if nothing happens, because this will get worse, they’ll keep pushing. These Aboriginals are never happy. They’ll go out there and say something even worse next time they get the opportunity to time the representatives for their community hired by the government, who are like 10% Aboriginal, 90% White, but identify entirely with their Aboriginal heritage! Even though Aboriginal heritage, people from that heritage are supposedly so oppressed. But White people are privileged. However, they choose to disavow all their privilege and just identify with the oppressed clan for some reason. It’s all bullshit!

 

But the point is that it’s going to get worse!

 

And I think if the players don’t do anything, if the clubs don’t do anything, it’s probably some, like some banner time, then it might be time to show up.

 

Joel Davis: The clubs are all [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: The clubs themselves won’t, but the players might. But the problem with the players is they’re very soldierly. That’s the way they’re trained. And so they won’t do anything unless it’s as a unit. One of them won’t just whimsically walk off on his own. He’ll wait for the boys to. It’d have to be like a collaborative effort, a planned thing that happens behind closed doors between the players that have to discuss it, talk about it, how they’re going to do it, keep it to themselves. It’s unlikely, but there’s still a small possibility it could happen.

 

Joel Davis: Whoever wants to lead it, though, they can become a hero. Like, yeah, you might end up, you’re going to get a lot of controversy, but you’ll become a hero of the Australian people if you, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah! Put it this way, you’ll be the most famous footballer of our era and not for having played good football. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But yeah, but I support the fake Aboriginals. Like, you know, people say:

 

“Oh, look, there’s always people taking all these Aboriginal benefits and they’re just White people that are pretending to be Aboriginals. I support it. I think every White person, if you can, become a fake Aboriginal, get all the Aboriginal money. And the more of us that could become fake Aboriginals, the more of a mockery we can make of this whole thing. We should have the maximized amount of White fraud of the Aboriginal, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got too much pride, man! I’ve got so much pride to do that. I can’t get around saying, I’m Aboriginal. I just can’t do it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, you don’t have to outwardly, you know, present yourself to the public as an Aboriginal.

 

But, yeah, we need the Abo-Saxon race must rise! The Abo-Saxon tribe, …

 

[1:38:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they ask you that everywhere. They ask you that everywhere in Australia:

 

“Are you of Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander descent?”

 

When you’re going for a job, when you’re going into education, when you’re going into jail, they ask you all the time.

 

And I’ve always wondered, like, I never understood before I got into politics. I wondered, why do they keep asking me that? And now I know, like, there’s all these special privileges you get if you are of those descents, but it’s just something I’ve got too much pride to try to exploit, personally.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough.

 

So we should maybe cover some, like, stories in the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom mentioned that he wanted to bring up. The event that we went to on the weekend, because I don’t know if you’ve seen Joel.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! I think we should avoid talking about that, actually. Let’s not talk about that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why? Well, it’s been in the news today just recently. There’s a big article on it because the restaurant owner has I don’t know. Do you want to bring it up or not? We don’t have to.

 

Joel Davis: I think we should avoid it. I should avoid the subject.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s up to you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Let’s have a look here. What’s going on? Well, there was the story.

 

So basically, the Premier of, I mean whenever we talk about Australian politicians, it’s just like racial cuckoldry to the max! I mean, it’s so bad.

 

So this is the Victorian remier, what’s her name? Jacinta Allen. She has promised to reserve 25% of the state’s regional work visas for international students, putting them on track to stay in Australia permanently. So she’s basically met with the Indians and is trying to facilitate helping more Indians exploit our immigration system to move into regional areas. So, like, White flight isn’t an option. Like, people think:

 

“Oh, just get out of the cities, move to the country towns!”

 

Yeah, well, the government is sending Indians to you, too! There’s really no escape from this. At some point we’re going to have to stop White flighting and start fighting back.

 

But, yeah, like, it’s kind of also somewhat unprecedented or rarely precedent for the state government to intervene on immigration and try and overpower, like, get involved in what is supposed to be a federal issue.

 

But, you know, of course she went over to India, met with the Indians, and every time an Australian politician goes to meet with the Indians, they always come back with the promise to bring more Indians into Australia. Like, why is the Indian government so intent on trying to facilitate sending their people into our country? It’s like, it must be some kind of strategy. Like, the Indian government must have realised:

 

“Like, fuck! Like, we’ve got 1.4 billion people. They’ve got like 26 million or whatever, and they’re stupid enough to take hundreds of thousands of us every single year. If we just keep shipping them in, eventually we can just colonise Australia. We wouldn’t even have to fight a war or anything. We can just keep dumping them in there, dumping them in there, dumping them in there for the next 20 years, and eventually we’ll just take over!”

 

And our government is like:

 

“Yes!”

 

Like just totally complicit in it. Why? Like, what even leverage did they really have over us, the Indian government? They don’t have any really ostensible leverage. It’s just like pure cuckoldry. It’s insane! Like, yeah, we’re in like some kind of vague military alliance with them. And I’m sure there’s some kind of backhanded deals they do with our politicians, but they’re trying to win some Indian votes. Obviously, the Labor Party specifically has identified the fact that Indians vote Labour at much higher rates than the average.

 

So if you can get a White electorate and you can stuff enough Indians in it, you can flip it from voting more Right-wing to voting Labour. And it can become a solid Labour seat because a lot of the White Leftists are voting Greens now. So Labour seems to be just tripling down on importing voters from India rather than trying to figure out how to appeal to the people who already live here to the White Australians.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty fucking disgusting!

 

Allen, you were telling me, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Jacinta Allen’s from Bendigo. I think she grew up there. And so she took a particular, well, she was particularly disdainful of our activism in Bendigo. And then she became Transport Minister while Daniel Andrews was premier.

 

And obviously she was pretty chummy with Andrews, because she ended up taking over the job of premier after he., … What did he do? I think he stepped down for some reason, but I don’t know. I won’t divert from the story too much, but Jacinta Allen, while she was Minister for Transport, was the minister who banned Sky News from all public spaces over which government had jurisdiction, such as trains and train stations, because I’d been on Sky News and she was worried that someone might see the interview of me on Sky News. [chuckling] So she’s totally against free speech. She’s totally pro-system, anti-worker, anti-Australian people. She doesn’t want the Australian people to have any real representation.

 

So it’s no surprise that she’s doing shit like this. It’s just classic, just Jacinta Allen, just classic systemite, bureaucrat shit! And this is exactly why we need a complete overhaul of our political system. Total revolution! We can’t work within its parameters necessarily, because there’s people like this at the helm. Like Jacinta Allen is now the premier of our state. And this is someone who’s extremely hostile, not just to the politics we represent, but to the Australian working class. Right?

 

[1:44:02]

 

And it reminds me of Yuri Bezmenov* lecture when he said:

 

“Your country’s been thoroughly subverted and prepared for total destabilisation and takeover when the people who have power are actually hated or despised by the voters, by the working class.”

 

So the masses, despite the fact that despite them hating their leaders so much, the leaders are still in power somehow, and yet there’s supposed to be a democracy. That’s apparently the point at which your country’s on its knees. It’s been thoroughly subverted from within. And I suppose that’s the position that our country’s in right now, unfortunately.

 

[* Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov (December 11, 1939 – January 5, 1993) was a Soviet journalist for Novosti Press Agency. In 1970, as a member of the Soviet mission in New Delhi, India, Bezmenov defected to the West and was re-settled in Canada pursuant to an arrangement between American and Canadian security agencies. Wikipedia]

 

But there’s silver linings to this. Because the book I’m reading of, just about finished reading by David Kilcullen, describes the fitness effects, which I’ve talked about to some degree on a couple of spaces recently. The fitness effect is a phenomenon where a group or organisation, a philosophy, people who represent a philosophy, whatever it may be, it’s the same for criminal gangs, sometimes. There needs to be an appropriate amount of consistent pressure in order for the group to respond to adaptation and overcome that pressure in time. If there’s not enough pressure, the group can stagnate. If there’s too much pressure, it can be crushed completely. But I tend to think that we have just enough pressure in order to effectively adapt to and overcome our adversaries at this point, if things remain on the trajectory they’re currently on, I feel it’s the perfect amount of pressure for us to.

 

And it’s an exciting thought. What we could actually learn. We’re being forced to adapt to an enemy, which is putting that appropriate amount of pressure on us. And what’s exciting is how powerful we may become so long as we survive as a race.

 

I think the reason why our race is being targeted for extermination is because that’s the only way to guarantee defeat against White people generally or against, you know, descendants of Europe.

 

If they’re given the same opportunity to procreate, flourish, develop, they eventually become master of the world. And so to defeat them, you have to actually annihilate their race. You have to impose a plan of genocide onto them. And that’s exactly why our adversaries today are doing that. Because if we live as a race, we win. We win eventually! We adapt and win. So all we have to do is survive, and victory is guaranteed!

 

So they understand that, too, I think, which is why the genocide programs are in place.

 

Joel Davis: And the main thing that has held White people back, particularly in recent years, is that we’re too fucking nice. And what White people are learning through this process is that the morality of being the nice guys of the world is ultimately not fit to survive. That the people who want to hold on to that are going to die! Every single institution, culturally, socially, etcetera, that wants to hold on to the “nice guy” morality of the White cuck is going to die with the White cuck. And all that’s going to remain is the “No More Mr Nice Guy, White Guy”.

 

All that’s going to remain is the Whiteman who finds his balls and regains a sense of brutality and regains a sense of the necessity that struggle survival, is not up for debate.

 

Now, I’ve been rereading Schmitt’s concept of the political lately, and one point that he makes about war. He criticises what’s called “just war theory”, which comes out of the Catholic tradition, and Roman law, which is basically what legally justifies a military action. Under what conditions could a war be said to be just or unjust? And Schmitt criticises that notion. He says that war currently be understood in terms of morality, because war is fundamentally existential.

 

In other words, war is not justified by morality. War is justified by the necessity to survive. That there is an enemy which is negating your way of life. And your choice is either to fight or to basically succumb and ultimately lose your existence in this world. And that’s the only ultimate justification for being willing to fight to the death with an opponent, which is that you’re being challenged to the death. Your existence is being challenged on the existential level.

 

So that is what is happening to White people writ large.

 

And so we’re going to have to develop a culture, a morality, a way of life that adapts, a politics that adapts to that environment, a politics which simply asserts our existential interest, our necessity to survive to the exclusion of all other concerns. And that’s ultimately why I am a National Socialist, because that really is the essence of National Socialism.

 

This idea that this world is a world of eternal struggle, the recognition that nature ultimately rewards those who will fight for their existence and punishes those who won’t. And Adolf Hitler himself said, like, basically, to paraphrase:

 

“Those who will not fight for their existence in this world of eternal struggle deserve to die and will die.”

 

And so that is ultimately the problem holding back White people is that when they look at politics, they look at politics often in terms of morality or in terms of this kind of practical desire, which is kind of the outward presentation, but inwardly as a form of cowardice, which is basically conflict avoidance:

 

“Can we all just get along? What is conservatism? Can we stop doing this identity politics thing? It’s freaking me out. It’s pitting one group against the other and it’s going to end up leading to conflict. And we can’t have conflict. Can’t we all just be individuals? Can’t we all just focus upon how we all pay tax and how we all work hard and we all have families to go home to? And can’t we all just existence pure economic actors, and not become political, not have identities, not be posed against one another in any kind of struggle? Because that’s freaking me out, man!”

 

That’s basically what conservatism is, trying to eliminate existential reality from politics and try and negotiate some kind of agreement of how everyone can all get along.

 

But the reality is that there’s not going to be an agreement as to how everyone can get along. Ultimately, we’re going to have to fight. All of human history has been, there’s two groups. Ultimately, one group’s way of life is negated by the other group’s way of life because they can’t both dominate the same territory. And so they’re going to have to fight over who gets to control it. And if someone’s going to win and someone’s going to lose and maybe one group is afraid to fight. So they cuck and subordinate themselves, and they’re destroyed by their own subordination.

 

[1:50:53]

 

 

And part of being a Whiteman, an Aryan, is that you come from a bloodline that refuse to cuck. An Aryan means to be a man of honour. That’s what Aryan comes from the word “ayah”, which means the honourable or the noble. We are the honourable race, the noble race. Meaning our race, never subordinated ourselves to another race. That’s why we have pure blood. Because we were never subordinated as slaves to anyone, and then bred with other groups and ultimately subsumed into some, like, completely different thing than what we organically are. No, we are a noble race. Our ancestors conquered. They weren’t conquered. They did the conquering.

 

And now what is happening is that we’re effectively being conquered.

 

And it’s like if you want to stay, if you want your descendants to ultimately retain their Aryanness, to retain their honour, to retain their blue eyes and their light, their fair hair and their fair skin, and the nobility of their blood, then you’re gonna have to fucking fight, to ensure that you’re not just an individual with rights under the Constitution. And you’re gonna have to fight to ensure that your people run your own fucking country! That your people run their own fucking empire! That’s the only guarantee of your freedom and the freedom of your progeny and your. And your posterity in this world is being in charge of your own shit! Running your own shit with no one else outside having the ability to come in and intervene and tell you what to do.

 

So that’s the Whiteman that is going to survive. The Whiteman who comes to terms with that reality.

 

So the only form of White culture that is really going to survive what is happening to us right now is the full Nazi mode, Whiteman! Which is why that’s what I’ve decided to be, and what we’ve kind of decided to become. Because we recognise that that’s the only kind of Whiteman that’s ultimately going to get out of this shit!

 

All the other kind of cuck strategies that all the other Whites are going to do, they’re going to fucking die with those strategies. Because all those strategies lead to mongrelisation, miscegenation, subordination, conquest, and so on. Becoming minorities, becoming persecuted minorities, losing control of the political system, and controlled by jews and other foreign interests, essentially over your destiny, over your countries, over your way of life, and the destruction of your culture, the destruction of your dignity, the destruction of everything that will guarantee an existence in this world which is dignified and honourable and ultimately your own.

 

So I talked about this a few streams ago. When we’re talking about World War Two revisionism, I talked about what freedom fundamentally means. I feel like that’s a point that’s really important to reiterate. That the word “free”, like, if you look at the Indo Aryan root, etymologically, of the word “free”, it comes from the same root, “pri”, I think, is the root in the Indo Aryan root language. Which is the root word that ultimately leads to the goddess Freyr*. In the Germanic languages, or in Germanic Paganism, Freyr is the goddess of love.

 

[* Freyr/Freya One of the principal deities of the Norse pantheon, the lovely and enchanting Freya was a goddess of blessings, love, lust, and fertility. A member of the Vanir tribe of deities, Freya shared her people’s penchant for the magical arts of divination. It was Freya who introduced the gods to seidr, a form of magic that allowed practitioners to know and change the future. Freya was gentler and more agreeable than the other Norse deities. Where Thor accomplished his goals through aggression and Odin and Loki resorted to trickery, Freya achieved her ends with the gentler persuasions of gifts, beauty, and sex. While Freya was often unselfish and helpful, she did have a darker side. Like the male gods, Freya had a taste for blood and fought fiercely in battle. It was said she took the lives of half the warriors ever slain in battle. https:// mythopedia.com/topics/freya]

 

And basically, the etymology of freedom and the etymology of love is the same in the Germanic languages. In other words, we understood what it meant to be a free man, to be beloved by the community. In other words, if he is a free man, he is a man that we love. In other words, he is our kin. He is our kinsman.

 

And so when you live in the land of your kinsman, you are given your freedoms because you are beloved by your community, because you are part of the family, you’re part of the ethnic group, you’re part of the nation. And we, as a people, give a dignity to all the members of our race, of our stock.

 

They understood that freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. No, you’re free because you are loved by your people and because your people make you free. You can’t be free as an individual in this world because you’re a social animal and you’re subject to all of these, you know much larger organisations of men that are composed of thousands and millions of people, and they will crush you as an individual unless you have an organisation of thousands and millions of men that will defend you as an individual. So your freedom comes from your people’s freedom. Your destiny is tied up with your people.

 

And that’s why ultimately, for me, race is the essential principle of my politics. Because we get out of this as White men or we die as White men, there isn’t going to be an alternative.

 

[1:55:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Good stuff. We’ve been streaming for a while now. We’re approaching the two hour mark. We’ve got a few Superchats from Rumble to go through. How are you guys feeling? You feeling like you want to continue? You want to start wrapping it up? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I wouldn’t mind asking Tom a question because I want to get his take on before we get to the Superchats. I’m sure he’s seen a lot of the discourse on this, working with other races, multiracial alliances, and people bring up things like:

 

“Oh, well, George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party went and sent their leadership to the Black Panther conference or whatever the fuck and they were willing to work together and Hitler allied himself with non-Whites and in World War Two and blah, blah, blah. And so we should look to make multiracial alliances.”

 

My retort to that is like:

 

“Yeah, I don’t actually mind making an alliance with Japan or with some other, like, non-White foreign country, if that makes sense militarily.”

 

But I don’t really want to be making alliances with non-White immigrants in my own country unless they are basically part of some project to move themselves back to wherever the fuck they came from. Then I’d be willing to work with them because they’re like, literally trying to get their people the fuck away from my people. But outside of that, I really don’t want anything to do with them. Do you think that’s too hard line of a position, or do you have an alternative take? I’m curious. I don’t think we’ve really gone over, like, your doctrine on this issue.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve used the term “defensive pact” as opposed to alliance. I think you can have a non-Aggression pact. Like, I feel like as a movement, it would strategically make sense here in Australia to not have any antagonistic relationship with, say, the Christian Assyrians that are currently the only other community in this country, despite the fact that they’re not actually White. They’re Caucasian, but they’re not European. They’re Assyrians. They’re kind of as White as Arabs get. They’re like the really White Arabs, and that’s why they’re Christians instead of Muslims, because they’re not as, like they’re probably closer to the genetic stock of the people of the Middle East prior to the Islamic rape gang coming in from Arabia. And they are more or less in line with probably 90% of what we believe. The only major difference is that obviously they’re not European. They’re kind of like 90% European, maybe genetically at best. At absolute best.

 

And so I believe in a non-Aggression with them. I don’t want to antagonise them. When they had that terrorist attack happen to them where one of their priests got attacked by the Muslim terrorist and got stabbed in the head, obviously the cops came down really hard on them and you know, attacked them and arrested a whole bunch of them out the front of their church. They’ve actually organised a lot of protests in Sydney as well. They’re a very large community and they’re very militant. They’re a very militant Christian militant community. I just wish that White Christians were as militant and as strong and as tight knit as the Assyrian Christians were in Sydney.

 

So that’s like an example where I don’t think it would be against my values to have a coffee with these kinds of people and talk about how we can defensively work together. But I don’t really want any alliances with non-Europeans. They can be the last to go back to Assyria or Syria. They can go first class. You know, the jews can pay for it. I mean, you know what I mean? Like, we can look after them, but they can’t stay here, ultimately. But I want to be respectful to them.

 

And then there’s groups that I have absolutely no interest in being respectful to. Like, I have no interest in being respectful to the Africans, the Muslims. The, I mean, the Muslims are a mixed bag in themselves. There’s a lot of different sects of Islam. Some you can be semi-respectful to, and most you can’t. They’re pieces of shit!

 

What else? Islanders, again, Islanders are a mixed bag. I try not to make it complicated to specifically ask the question regarding the historical take of Rockwell. I support almost everything that Rockwell did, and it was maybe more of a PR campaign to do that.

 

Also, he was supporting a group that was segregating. So it’s relevant to the politics of the day that Rockwell went to the Nation of Islam, met with the Nation of Islam, and it was a group of black people that were ultimately trying to segregate themselves from the rest of society. So Rockwell’s main enemy was Martin Luther King, who was obviously trying to desegregate America and make sure all the little black kids and all the little White kids grew up together, which is obviously, we’re in the result of that now, that dystopia.

 

So it makes sense to me to have a kind of defensive relationship like Rockwell with the Nation of Islam, to say:

 

“Well, look, we actually kind of want a similar thing, and we can get to restructuring America when one of us are actually, politically, relevant, when we’re actually in power. In the meantime there’s no need to assassinate each other. We’ve got enough enemies.”

 

So that’s kind of how I feel about certain non-White groups. It’s like I don’t want to go to war with them at this stage because my primary enemy is the traitors within the Australian government. That’s the primary enemy, in my opinion! The jewish lobby are going to do what they’re going to do, and they’re very, extremely powerful. But the primary issue is, as White people, we need a clean house. We need to have respect and dignity again. And I don’t think any of these conversations with any of these non-White groups is going to be from a position of dignity. So that’s why I don’t have them. I don’t have any relationships with non-White groups.

 

That’s why I think it’s ridiculous when people do. I think it’s ridiculous when, I mean, Rockwell had respect, Rockwell had dignity, and America had a lot more dignity back then. So it kind of made a little bit of sense.

 

And I won’t even open the can of worms, which is Hitler, World War Two, because we’ve covered that on stream before and we’ve extensively talked about the geopolitical strategy and significance of all the different possibilities of World War Two. What if he allied with this instead of that? You know, it’s just no point.

 

But before I hand the mic back over, we kind of skimmed through a bunch of things. I know we are coming to a close for tonight, but there is Superchats. I actually had on a list of topics that the Moira Deeming [sp]. I don’t know how to pronounce name. Moira Deeming defamation trial, 15 day trial has been going through the courts. It’s all over the media at the moment here in Australia, Americans will have no idea what we’re talking about. But we can go into it. I can at least give a quick rundown even if we don’t want to discuss it. But just quickly update everyone on what’s happening with the Moira Deeming trial.

 

[2:02:41]

 

 

Joel Davis: Isn’t it Moira?

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Moira.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a strange name. It doesn’t seem like a White name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know what it is, actually, but, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Looks like it spells Maori and she’s a part Maori as well. It’s quite a strange name.

 

But anyway, apparently she’s a little bit jewish as well. But that’s kind of irrelevant. I’ll just go into it.

 

So when we did the Destroy Pedo Freaks rally at the Parliament steps, there was a Let Women Speak rally going on at the same time. We were aware of that rally happening obviously. There were trans exclusionary radical feminists. So they’re like, second or 2.5 wave feminists. There’s a difference between second wave feminism and third wave feminism. They’re kind of bordering on third wave feminism, but they’re against the woke culture of what you could describe as, like, this fourth wave feminism where they’re accepting trannies and they want trannies in bathrooms and trannies in women’s sport and stuff like that.

 

Anyway, so they were having a protest against that. We thought it’d be a good idea to be like:

 

“Yeah, well, we’re not against trannies in women’s sport. That’s the least of our issues. We’re against trannies in general. Let’s hit the nail on the head instead of dancing around the primary issue.”

 

And because we went down to that rally, Moira Deeming, who was a Liberal Party MP, actually got stood down from the Liberal Party. And she was described by the leader of the Liberal Party, or the leader of the opposition as a Nazi, or at least being sympathetic to Nazis when she wasn’t.

 

And so now Moira Deeming, my understanding is she’s suing John Prosecco for defamation. And it’s a 15 day trial, and they’re going through all the evidence, and 90% of the evidence is just talking about us. 90% of the evidence is just like:

 

“These are Nazis. These are, in fact, Nazis. These are Nazis doing Roman salutes. These are Nazis on the Parliament steps doing Roman salutes. This is a speech from Thomas Sewell describing why he’s against paedophiles and trannies.”

 

Honestly, it’s a very interesting trial, and it’s been all over the news. And it just shows the relevance and it shows the dialectic. Like, it shows that we’re an unavoidable heavyweight in politics, despite our seeming irrelevance and minuscule size. Like, just being near us is like, it’s causing implosions with than the Liberal Party. And that’s telling. That’s telling. And these trials will set precedence. And it changes the dynamic. It’s a spanner in the works, a little bit of chaos, which I can’t help but feel quite happy about. I like the chaos of these rodent, rat, traitor politicians! I like that there’s chaos amongst them.

 

But they don’t know how to mentally gymnastic their way out of these associations, and they’re turning on each other. You know, one side of the party turns on the other side of the party because one side was standing in the vicinity of Nazis. Fascinating stuff!

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say that I looked up the word, the name “Moira”, and apparently it is of Greek and Irish origin. In Greek, it translates to “destiny”.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s an old fashioned name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I don’t want to slander a Greek name with negative, but I think it’s kind of like the Greek version of the name Mary, but also somewhat adopted by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Regarding, like, have you guys ever got the feeling when you’re talking to Muslims that you’re talking to like, a sleazy used car salesman? That they’re not being genuine?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think the reason I sense that from them is I was thinking about this tonight. This will be my final point before I start getting ready to sign out. I suppose. It’s because they’re kind of only geared to recruit or kill you and I wrote about this on Twitter at some stage or xdev, and I was thinking also about the word “convert” and how no one actually really converts in any true sense to Islam, especially not when you’re a White guy. Right? Because think about it. What are you converting? You’re not converting. You’re not changing into anything else. You’re still White with White predispositions. You still got these thousands of years of Christian or Catholic history behind you, probably. Maybe something else.

 

But the point is that even if you think you’re converting to a different religion all you’re really choosing to do is prioritize different thoughts and perspectives of reality, but physically, nothing actually changes. It’s just your ideas inside your head that are converted.

 

And so there’s no real physical or measurable conversion which takes place. Then I started realizing that Muslims don’t want anyone to convert. They want the to submit! You don’t convert to Islam, you submit to it! And Islam being a foreign camp, what are you doing when you’re converting to Islam? You’re submitting to a foreign camp, to a foreign force, foreign to your nation, foreign to your culture, foreign to your spirit!

 

And I think the Muslims are aware of this. That’s why when they’re trying to sell Islam as something that is desirable for you feel like you’re being conned by a salesman, because that’s exactly what’s happening.

 

[2:08:17]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, that also says something about the Islamic races themselves, that they’re all the descendants of people who submitted. Like they didn’t have the dignity to hold on to their older traditions or die an honourable death, but instead just cucked to Allah.

 

So really, like these people that are proud to be Muslim. Like, you’re a cuck! Like, the fact that you’re a Muslim, that your parents are Muslim, that your grandparents are Muslims, you know, it means ultimately you descend from someone who cucked and bowed down.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have respect for Islam only because it has like a powerful foothold in the world. I mean, you can’t really deny that whoever Muhammad was a significant character because isn’t it something like a quarter of the world’s population strive to live in his image today?

 

So you can’t really dispute that there’s respect there that you have to have, but you have to have that respect for it as a force that’s outside of your own camp.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a powerful force. Yeah, but it’s disgusting! Like, I don’t have any respect for it in terms on, like, a human level. On a human level, it is a religion for low IQ mongrels. It’s a religion for fucking sand nigger retards! Let’s be real.

 

I mean, the Quran, Islamic philosophy, this stuff is not very refined. It’s not befitting of a high IQ, spiritually deep person. And Muhammad himself was just a paedophile warlord. He wasn’t like some profound mystic or something. So to have him as your religious leader is embarrassing. It really is. So, yeah, I got no respect for Muslims. Zero, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t know that you were so anti-Islam, Joel. I thought maybe you might see eye to eye with them on a few things, but.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, there’s some things we could see eye to eye on in the sense of like there’s prohibitions against usury and throwing the fags off buildings is kind of funny.

 

But ultimately, you know, these are superficial things.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, good chat, boys. I’m glad we had it. I do want to move on to Superchats. We’ve got a bunch from Rumble, and I can’t see them anywhere except Rumble. So we can start with Rumble. Are we ready to sign off?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let’s do the Superchats.

 

By the way, some people send me some Superchats on Entropy. Entropy reloaded, and I don’t know how to pull them back up.

 

So if you are watching and you sent me an Entropy Superchat, I have one here from Grim Grandpa who just said:

 

“White fucking power!”

 

So I got that one.

 

But all the ones before that, like people sent them before the show started. And then when the show started, it reloaded and I lost the ones that were sent before the show started, before I could read them off.

 

So if you’re offended by that, you want your Superchat, read out please just send me a DM and so I can. I don’t actually remember what you said so that I can read it out for the on the next episode or send it to me quickly now. We can read it on this episode if you’re watching live. I know it’s a little bit boomer tech, but yeah, I just can’t figure out in Entropy exactly where to find it. I’m in the middle of a stream, so I can’t dick around looking for it anyway.

 

But we do have some from Odysee, so I’ll read those out and then we’ll do the Rumble ones. Gaelic Glory said:

 

“Moira is an anglicisation of an Irish name, basically of Mary. I’m an Irish buck. Moving to Australia next year. Can I become a part of the movement?”

 

Yes, if you move to Australia and you’re a Whiteman, you can be included. We do actually have people who were born in Ireland and have Irish accents and were born in England and have English accents in the organisation. And being an Irishman or an Englishman who moves to Australia is pretty standard. It’s part of Australian culture. It always has been, because that’s basically what Australia is. It’s just like a resettlement programme for Anglo Celts on the opposite side of the world. So of course you can be included as long as you meet all the relevant criteria. Filled Soda said:

 

“I say I’ve got catching up to do as there are some episodes missing on Odysee. I wish there was something like your organisation here. All those people died during the troubles. Now they’re giving it all away.”

 

Obviously this is another Irishman.

 

Yeah, I mean, there is an Irish nationalist scene, but there’s nothing really quite like us, I guess, as far as I know. So you can join your friend in moving to Australia if you want to come and join us as well. But yeah, and honoured to see that.

 

[2:13:02]

 

On Odysee I had issues with re-uploading after the streams, so if you want to watch the replays of the streams, check it out on Rumble. And now actually, I’ll be putting every stream will be up on Twitter, so you can also watch the streams back on Twitter. And you can also, if you want to listen back to the audio of each stream, you can get the audio which will be uploaded. The Telegram channel is basically T.me/JoelandBlair, and it’s just called The Joel and Blair Show archive Telegram channel.

 

If you want to catch audio replays, people like that for listening back at work, like, or putting it on in the background. And Filled Soda actually send another Superchat, he said:

 

“Glad to catch another stream live here in Belfast. I’ve got some catching up to do over on Rumble 1488.”

 

Yeah. So the same guy. Yeah. So catch the replays over on Rumble.

 

But, yeah, that’s all the Odysee Superchats. Blair, do you want to read the Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure, man. We’ll do the Rumble next. Is that what’s up?

 

The first one is from Jake Sake. Sends $2. Thanks, mate. $2:

 

“Thanks for fighting against the migrant brown horde scum flooding this great nation!”

 

You’re very welcome, my friend. Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends $10. Thanks very much, Fellow Comrade. He says:

 

“NSN have been labelled a threat to social cohesion by mainstream media, but they are one of the only groups actually pushing for real social cohesion.”

 

Interesting perspective. Everything is upside down.

 

Joel Davis: So it’s like when they say, … I was arguing with these multiracial alliance retards, and they were saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the jews turn us against each other. They turn the Whiteman against the black man because they want to divide us so that we don’t take down the jew.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Well, no, nature divides us.”

 

Because they were calling me a Fed or insinuating that I’m a secret jewish operative because I’m a White nationalist. Like, wait, wait, wait! Jews were afraid of White nationalism. That’s why they brought the fucking brown people here in the first place! To dilute the population and prevent us from forming a cohesive identity that can reject the jews.

 

And you can see in Australia, this is explicitly true in Australian history, the development of Australian quote, unquote, “multiculturalism”. Jewish community leaders back in the early 1950s, before the White Australia Policy was repealed, were saying this:

 

“That we in the jewish community are kind of concerned about how we’re kind of excluded by this Anglo Christian society that we live in. We’re the outsiders. And so what we want to do is we want to push for immigration to be opened up to other types of foreigners so that we’re not the odd man out anymore, because then there’s going to be a bunch of Asians and Indians and blacks and blacks, blah, blah blah. And then all of a sudden, the jews just are just one group among many and we’re no longer the odd man out.”

 

And then they pursued that strategy very effectively, pushing into politics, ultimately getting in control of the Immigration Department in the 1970s and opening Australia’s borders.

 

So there’s a really good article on The Occidental Observer. If you guys don’t know what The Occidental Observer is, Google that shit right now and go there. It’s a brilliant resource. There’s great articles there from a lot of really good intellectuals. Andrew Joyce, Kevin MacDonald, many other great authors.

 

There’s a great article on there and it’s a I think it’s like a five part series called The War on White Australia. It’s written by Brenton Sanderson. And that five part article details the kind of history, basically, of jewish subversion of White Australian society.

 

 

It is a brilliant resource that everyone who is interested in the specificness of the Australian JQ, so to speak, the Australian jewish question, that article is one of the best resources to kind of give you a good overview. I recommend you go and read that and check out that site in general. That will give you a lot of really good knowledge, particularly on the jewish question. A lot of brilliant articles on there.

 

But yes, no, the jew hasn’t turned us against them. We’re turned against them naturally, by virtue of the fact that we’re fucking different. They had different blood, different culture, different everything. We’re not supposed to be in a society with them.

 

So, yes, if you want social cohesion, the best way to have it is to have racial cohesion!

 

Blair Cottrell: Our next Superchat is from Mr Anglo. Sends in $5. Thanks, Mr Anglo. He says:

 

“Hey, lads, great stream as always. Take this advice from an English nationalist on how to view all Muslims. They are all just anthro-Arab jews, aka, they are just as deceitful but more thuggish and apishe!”

 

Okay, I’ll take that on board, mate. Thanks. We’ve got $5 from Jake Sake, who’s reaching a little bit deeper into his pockets this time. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“Who are the top three jews in Australia that are orchestrating the invasion of Australia by these brown horde parasites?”

 

Who are they, boys? The top three most influential, powerful jews in Australia. Who would they be?

 

 

[Image: Times of Israel, May 2018 – https://www.timesofisrael.com/5-of-the-7-wealthiest-people-in-australia-are-jewish/]

 

Thomas Sewell: Pratt, Heidler,[sp] …

 

[2:18:51]

 

Joel Davis: Triguboff*. He’s like, I think he’s now demoted to number three on the rich list. But he is the richest property developer in Australia.

 

[* Harry Oskar Triguboff is an Australian billionaire real estate developer, and one of Australia’s richest people. He is the founder and managing director of Meriton and is known as “high-rise Harry”. As of May 2023, The Australian Financial Review assessed Triguboff as the fourth richest Australian by net worth, estimated at A$23.80 billion, as published in the 2023 Rich List. Wikipedia]

 

And so he doesn’t just love immigration because he’s a jew that wants to genocide the White race and replace us in our own country, but also because he wants the benefits of the property market being jacked up artificially by immigration, or by immigrants coming in and boosting demand so that they have to build more high rise apartments everywhere to stuff all these pajeets into. And therefore Harry Triguboff’s company can come along and build those high rises with big government grants for billions and billions of dollars and sell them off a million dollars a pajeet box.

 

And then all the jews in the banks can then go issue even bigger and bigger mortgages to the goys and they can rub their hands together at the high interest rate.

 

So yeah, Harry Triguboff is scum and he’s one of the biggest contributors in political campaign financing as well. And he openly states, you know, his support for immigration and is massively supportive of like the pro-immigration lobby in general and has been for decades.

 

So yes, he doesn’t get enough hate to be honest. Like he’s this jewish billionaire who basically makes his fortune off the backs of the average Australian being screwed over by this perpetual housing bubble that he keeps paying off the government to exacerbate with more and more immigrants. And I feel like we should do more work to like focus some like collective hatred on this guy. Because every single Australian that’s struggling to find a house to rent right now, every single Australian that is getting absolutely raped in their mortgage repayments because their houses are wildly overpriced because of mass immigration fueling this perpetual housing bubble to the point of ridiculousness where in any major Australian city now, like, it’s almost impossible for anyone under the age of 35 to really get into the property market because of how exorbitant it is to buy even a shitty home in a shitty area. He’s one of the principal people that should be blamed. You know, his greed and his nefariousness and his lack of loyalty to this country is one of the main fundamental reasons, like why are we allowing a jew to be so fucking powerful in our country. So he needs more hate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Nice. And the next Superchat is from Wabo 84. Sends through $50. Thanks very much, mate. And he says:

 

“You guys made the ABCS 7:30 report tonight. Keep up the good work.”

 

Not sure how we made that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira Redeeming.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s always good to be on the news.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The next one’s from Jake. Jake1219, $10. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“Question for Tom. Would you say you follow a Machiavellian type philosophy? I noticed a couple of streams ago you welcome the catalysts of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m actually nowhere near as unscrupulous as Cottrell, but, … Look, he’s embarrassed. [chuckling] I think that the concept raises an interesting dynamic between winning at all cost, being unscrupulous, and being the principled dead man. And so being an Aryan is walking a tightrope, in my opinion, between those two concepts. I wouldn’t call myself Machiavellian, although I’d say I’m a realist. I think politically his advice is based on realism. It’s like, well, this is what you have to do to win! And I think that’s the dialogue.

 

But it’s not my advice. It’s not me. I’m a Hitlerian. I’m not a Machiavellian. I’m a Hitlerian. But I am very interested in the dynamic.

 

And as I say, I think the dynamic is a tightrope between not becoming Machiavellian and not becoming the principled dead man. I believe there is a tightrope in between that a leader must walk. Because there’s a lot of good guys that are dead. Well, everyone dies, but there’s a lot of good guys that die early. There’s a lot of good guys that don’t make it all the way. There’s a lot of good guys that have great ideas and great spirit and great character, and they are surpassed by people that are unscrupulous.

 

So I think it’s important to learn the Machiavellian principles. I think it’s also important to learn how the jews operate and how they’ve been so successful. But it doesn’t mean to emulate them. It just means to be aware of them.

 

But, yeah, it’s a very interesting question. You said, “welcome the catalyst of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters”. Well, I observe reality. I see what the system is doing. Maybe it’s a coping strategy. But I’m sick and tired of being frustrated. I’m just I’m fatigued. I’m frustration fatigued! I’m not frustrated at these things anymore. I’m not going to interrupt the enemy making a mistake. I think of these bad things happening to us are a good thing in the silver lining, in the sense, I mean, this is Hitlerian. This is not Machiavellian. This is Hitlerian. He says that all losses can be turned into a victory.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s funny. It’s a good answer. It’s a good answer.

 

It’s funny because I’ve had people throughout the years approach me and say:

 

“Oh I think, you know, Tom’s manipulative or Machiavellian.”

 

Or something like that, and I say:

 

“And you’re coming to me with this?”

 

[chuckling]

 

So anyway, next one is an interesting. Rimboard was Right. Who’s Rimboard? Rimboard was Right. Sends $2 and he says:

 

“Didn’t Europeans cuck to Christianity like the Muslims did?”

 

What do you reckon, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: It’s different because the Christians, this meme that the Christians are all forced to convert by the sword, it’s accurate in some parts of Europe, like in Scandinavia and so on. But it’s not actually universally accurate. Like, a lot of the conversions was like a genuine thing where people just genuinely adopted Christianity. It wasn’t like they were all forced to. It didn’t spread through warmongering, it spread through Evangelism to the majority of Europe.

 

[2:25:52]

 

Having said that, obviously there’s a lot of brutality in European history. I mean, particular sects of Christianity, like the Aryans, which is no relation necessarily to Aryan, as in the denomination of the race of Aryans. But the Aryans is in the followers of the theologian Arius. Arius taught, like, a non-trinitarian form of Christianity. A lot of the Gothic tribes, like, yeah, the Vandals and so on in the late period of the Roman Empire, followed that form of Christianity, which didn’t conform with the more orthodox form that we would know today as Catholicism. And they were pretty brutally, like, wiped out by Emperor Justinian.

 

And so it’s a complicated question, but I don’t think it’s exactly equivalent to Islam, because Islam really spread very specifically and directly through the sword with death penalties, basically, for not converting. They’ll come in, they’ll take over the territory militarily, then they’ll put a tax on you and oppress you until you convert. And then once you convert, you can’t then deconvert, otherwise you get executed.

 

So it’s a bit different. It’s kind of a more aggressively and systematically expansionist process.

 

Blair Cottrell: That subject leads us into this next Superchat, which is only little one, just a dollar from a bloke called, or someone called Phoenician Blood:

 

“As a Lebanese Christian, is it ironic of me to sympathize with your cause.”

 

I don’t know. Like, I have noticed that sort of personally, I’ve noticed when other races adopt Christianity, they tend to become more friendly to Whites for some reason. But I’ve never really had a good understanding of why that is because I haven’t thought enough about it to understand it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think you’re noticing that because the alternative for all of these races is to usually to be Muslim. So you get, like, a black Muslim, or a black Christian or, like a Lebanese Muslim, or a Lebanese Christian.

 

And obviously Muslims are more kind of hostile to us because they’re hostile to us on religious grounds, in addition.

 

I think also in with the when it comes to the Lebanese the I think there is actually somewhat of a racial or ethnic difference between the Christians and the Muslims there in general. So that could also play into it.

 

But yeah, if you’re a Christian Lebo, who sympathizes with us. Well, no, I mean, of course you would sympathize with us because why wouldn’t you? Like, this is clearly our fucking country and we’re being systematically genocided by jews, which you would, as a Lebanese person, understand why the jews are a problem. Considering the relations between Lebanon and Israel over the years.

 

My response to that is quite simple. Like, if you’re really that sympathetic, then why the fuck are you here? Like, get the hell out of our country. Like, you’re not really. People say that:

 

“Oh I’m very sympathetic. And when you guys win you can send me back, I guess, like, if you have to.”

 

And it’s well, if you really, truly sympathize with us, you’d get out now. We wouldn’t have to send you back.

 

Like, there was this guy. I told this story before, but there was this dude who was friends with a group of my friends who are White nationalists. And he was Sri Lankan, and he hung up with a bunch of these White nationalist guys for a while. I think he met a bunch of them at church or something. And he became so sympathetic to White nationalism that he literally did deport himself back to Sri Lanka. And then he established an organisation to help Sri Lankans move back. And now he’s, like, helping other Sri Lankans deport themselves back to Sri Lanka.

 

To me, that’s someone who’s sympathetic. To me, that’s an ally. I respect that individual. Like, he actually had convictions and he realised:

 

“Well, wait a second, I’m fucking Sri Lankan. Why am I living in Australia? I’m gonna go live with my own people and focused on making my own people better rather than living as an outsider, weirdo parasite in the country I don’t really belong in with dignity.”

 

I don’t want to live in a non-White country around a bunch of non-Whites. I want to live with my own people and practice my own culture. I would feel like a weird alien element. Really uncomfortable, to be honest, in someone else’s country where I didn’t belong.

 

So it’s kind of undignified. It’s like, if you’re a Lebanese dude, why don’t you want to go and live in Lebanon with your own fucking people? I don’t really get it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, this will be the last Superchat, I think, because it’s getting to that time where it’s 11:11. It’s getting that time where I’m about to, I’ve got to consider going to bed because I’ve got work in the morning. My brain’s starting to shut off. I can’t see how much money this person sent, but it’s from Land of the Fake, Home of the Gay. [chuckling] He says:

 

“Thanks for being based, lads. These morning shows are awesome!”

 

You’re welcome, bro. I don’t know where you are for it to be a morning show, but certainly not here. It’s getting approaching midnight here, so I’m ready to go to bed if you guys are ready. What do you think?

 

[2:31:27]

 

Joel Davis: Oh, there’s one more Superchat quickly from Truth Seeker 66 Degrees, who said:

 

“Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight for our freedoms, like in the USA. Love the show, White power.”

 

I don’t really know what you mean here by saying, “you not having to fight for our freedoms”. I don’t really know what that exactly means.

 

Like, obviously probably talking about, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The difference between the American Revolution and Australian Federation in 1901 being a different process, but, …

 

Joel Davis: It is a different process. But that was still a fight. Like, White nationalism was a political fight in Australia and federating the country. A lot of the reason why, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It didn’t require us to go to war.

 

Joel Davis: The British Empire went along with federation was because they didn’t want a repeat of what happened in America and they were concerned. I mean, those battles like the Eureka Stockade and so on, where Australian rebels raised flag and fought the British. Yeah, by blood.

 

[Blair leaves the stream]

 

Thomas Sewell: Night, night.

 

Joel Davis: But White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia. And it wasn’t as intensive as struggle because there was acquiescence from the authorities in Britain. And I think Australians being British, we were kind of quite happy to stay in the empire so long as we were given a certain amount of Democratic autonomy, which was actually granted, ultimately.

 

So I think if the Americans were given the deal that we were given, they probably wouldn’t have been an American Revolution.

 

But I don’t think that’s really why Australians are less politicised. I think it’s more to do with other cultural differences. I mean, one reason, actually, it was also that America is the most powerful country in the world. So, like, American politics kind of almost matters more because America has no kind of reference to an external, bigger country or something. Where a lot of people in Australia who are interested in politics, they’ll just consume American politics because it’s more interesting.

 

So you can have a conversation with Australians about American politics, and they kind of know what’s going on in America, sometimes almost, like, have more complex opinions about American politics than Australian politics, just because it’s a more interesting, like, media phenomenon to pay attention to. It’s more entertaining. Like, the characters are better. So that’s an aspect of it.

 

Additionally, I think because America has so many States and America’s got such an entrenched two party system, the kind of Republican versus Democrat thing is a lot more important there, and that kind of polarises the nation.

 

And also, Australia was pretty much a homogenous country until very recently. America has had the race issue, which was always a radically polarizing effect in American politics. And then immigration became a bigger problem quicker in America, where in Australia, we were, like, a 92% White country 15 years ago, 20 years ago. So, like, politics here was still the amicable dispute between middle class and working class Whites over tax policy and shit like that! Politics has only really become this kind of intense existential struggle that was highly racialised in a very short period of time. I don’t think our culture has really adapted to that.

 

Whereas in America, you’re voting for:

 

“What’s going to happen in the Cold War? Like, are we going to try and destroy communism? Who’s going to be in control of the nuclear weapons that could end the world? And, like fuck, there’s all these niggas, like, what are we going to do, like, what Mexicans pouring in!”

 

It’s like this big deal who’s in charge of America? Where in Australia, it really wasn’t a fucking big deal who was in charge. So I think that also contributes to it all.

 

But then also, I think you’d have to say American. The American founding stock were the Puritans. The Puritans coming over from Britain, who were kind of alienated by the politics at the time of the English Civil War and so on, where you have the Anglicans and the Catholics, and they wanted to kind of they were these ideological anti-Catholics, but also who didn’t want to acquiesce to the Church of England in many ways. And so there were, like, these political outsiders.

 

And so America was kind of founded by these kinds of political. This kind of political revolutionary spirit, and then they have their revolution and so on and so America’s always had this very intense intense earnestness, like, what they believe in, and they’re like, their principles in the world and so on are very definitive.

 

Whereas the Australian founding stock were a bunch of convicts, and the majority of us don’t descend from those convicts, but that almost like, has galvanised the country that, like the Australian people are kind of a little bit more rough. And it isn’t so much about ideological principles. Like, the struggle for Australian White nationalism was really just racism. It wasn’t like this big ideological battle about “our freedoms”. It was just kind of like:

 

“We don’t want fucking chinks here! This is the Whiteman’s fucking land. Get all these islanders out! Australia for the fucking Whiteman!”

 

That was really what Australia was always about. So Australia, in a certain sense, it didn’t have that highfalutin kind of ideological project.

 

And then like this civic education, when you go to school and you learn about the founding fathers and the freedoms that Thomas Jefferson wrote down in the Constitution and all this kind of shit! So Australians aren’t politicised for, I think, all of these reasons in the same way by the culture and the way that Americans are.

 

So I would say that would be my explanation. I know. Do you have any thoughts on that, Tom, wrap up the stream?

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Joel Davis: You kind of you kind of over it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s too late to go into. What are the question? Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight?

 

Fucking Americans! Like holier than thou! That’s their primary issue. Like what? How many Australians have they met? And they’re just making these claims on the Internet, like:

 

“Oh, well, the average Australian is not as political as the average American. And, it’s really down to the Second Amendment and the American Revolution!”

 

It’s like, you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. [chuckling] I could go into detail, but, yeah, there’s fucking normie fags in every country. There’s politically mobile people in every country. I can almost guarantee across the Western world, it’s the same percentage. It’s the same percentage of dedicated political activists. It’s the same percentage of sympathetic political agitators. It’s the same percentage of traitors. It’s the same percentage of fucking normies that just want to watch the football.

 

Joel Davis: But also, when Americans go on about how:

 

“Oh, Australia, you don’t have your freedoms like we do!”

 

It’s like we literally had a White nationalist fucking paradise where we had all the fucking freedoms in the world.

 

And then the British Empire got destroyed, kind of by you guys in your unholy alliance with the Soviet Union to destroy Nazi Germany in World War Two. And then in an aftermath, to decolonise the world.

 

So then we had to kind of throw in our lot with you guys, fight the Japanese and do the whole anti-communist, Cold War thing with you guys, and we threw in our lots with you guys, and then you all got taken over by fucking jews! And became the most cut empire in world history that loves niggers and so on with a passion!

 

And then you imposed, like, fundamentally, you imposed that ideology upon all of your allies in Europe and here. And our political system got infected with the virus that consumed your political system, and that is ultimately what’s taking away our fucking freedoms!

 

And so if you guys used your fucking First and Second Amendment to actually take down the jews and assert White American sovereignty and not cuck to all these other races and actually hold on to America, then we’d still be White nationalists, too. We’d still have our guns and we’d be loving it! It would be great! I don’t know what we’d be up to.

 

Thomas Sewell: Australia in the eighties and even the nineties before Port Arthur, you could go into Kmart and buy an assault rifle. Yeah, not every Kmart, but you could do that was actually on the store that in the stock of Kmart.

 

And another important example is that just because we don’t have a Trump doesn’t mean, we’re less politically active as a general people. The American politics is different to Australian politics. Australian politics is a halfway point between European politics and American politics.

 

So we don’t have a Trump, but most European countries don’t have one either. They have these kind of popularist, smaller parties that are slowly gaining and slowly becoming a sort of majority. It’s not a majority, it’s the biggest minority. They have these big minority parties.

 

Whereas, obviously, America, it’s a duopoly. Australia is in this halfway point. It doesn’t know where it’s going just yet. It’s between the two. And we’re trying to help guide Australia in the right direction, which is actually away from the American style politics. It’s actually away from the duopoly and more into the European style politics.

 

So I think that there are many European countries that are way further ahead than the United States because they have removed the first hurdle, which is the duopoly. They’ve already got that third party or that fourth party on the table that can start competing for power. And it’s a more mobile, it’s a politically mobile system. Whereas in America, you can’t do anything. It’s just party A, party B, party Blue, party Red, party Democrat, party Republican. And it’s the same AIPAC lobby controlling both.

 

Whereas in the dynamism, in the chaos of European politics, there’s actually room for a healthy. A healthy option to grow. There’s no room for a healthy option in American politics. So you might have the facade of a more political society because Trump is more Right-wing than the Australian alternatives, but you’re actually in a worse position. That’s my analysis.

 

If we’re really going to dig it out of me. My analysis, you’re actually further behind because you can’t actually do what needs to happen with someone like Trump and the Republican Party. They’re a megalith. They’re a behemoth in the way, an absolute behemoth, and it just keeps getting more powerful and more ingrained and more established. And it’s what actually needs to be destroyed. Like, we’ve got a chance in the next ten to 20 years of being able to destroy the Liberal Party in Australia. We do. We, like, give us 20 years. I think that White nationalists, I think we can destroy the Liberal Party. I think we can put the Liberal Party in the backseat.

 

But in America, you’re closer to civil war than being able to get rid of the Republican Party. But civil war will solve the problem as well. Fair enough.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well. All these Americans going:

 

“You Australians don’t have your guns!”

 

Okay. If you actually decide to use your guns and have a civil war, do you know how many of us are going to come over there and fucking help? We will pour in to fucking help you win! So, like, stop shitting on us!

 

Whichever side is team based versus, you know, team jew.

 

Thomas Sewell: The whole NSN just rocks up in a fucking black block fucking yacht with the NSN flag hanging.

 

[2:43:37]

 

Joel Davis: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because the government’s taking our passports off us!

 

Joel Davis: We need to make sure that the Whiteman wins in America so that we can have it like a better world for our race. Like, it’s so important. So we’ll come over, and the Europeans will come over and help, too. You guys can get a lot of reinforcements from us, so don’t be shitting in our fucking direction. And then because you’re going to be on the phone calling us up for help. So just remember that.

 

And secondarily, as well, I mean, I love Americans, actually. I love White Americans. My girlfriend’s a White American. If I have kids with her, I’ll have kids who have American citizenship and so on. I care about the future of America, and the future of our race is bound up with the future of America. So it’s important. That’s why I care about American politics. And I support our guys in America in a big way.

 

But Americans like to do this thing where:

 

“Yeah, oh, but you guys don’t have your guns. You don’t have your guns. You know, we got guns!”

 

And it’s like, but when are you gonna fucking do something with them? You know what I mean? Like, how bad do things have to get before you do something? Until you actually use them what does it actually count for? And I support gun rights, 100%. I’m glad you guys have them. I wish we had our guns, and I 100% support gun rights.

 

But it’s kind of like you can cope with all your guns, but you know, how many fucking beaners are pouring across the border? You know, look at what the crime. Look at your country is barely 50% White. It’s like holding on to your guns while everything slips through your fingers. Guns aren’t enough. You know, you need ultimately, like, a political movement to actually represent White Americans.

 

And, yeah, I’ll be rooting. I’ll be rooting for you. Is anyone in America that’s doing anything good. I’ve always tried to give my support behind them because it’s so important. I’m a White unity guy. I support all our guys all across Europe. I support our guys in the UK, in England in particular, big time, because that’s my ancestral homeland. But that is the most difficult country in the world to do nationalism.

 

So they’re fighting an uphill battle, but they’re still doing a lot of work. By the way, Tom, did you see the clip of Nigel Farage? He, like, cucked on mass deportations a few days ago.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Did you see that? Yeah, that was a shame. I’m not gonna pull up the clip.

 

Thomas Sewell: I gotta go to bed, I’ve got work.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you can go if you want. I’ve got a couple more Superchats coming, I gotta read, so.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you go through them.

 

Joel Davis: Good night, dude. So, Jake, 1219 says:

 

“Question for all, why do you think the English were so effective at dividing Scotland in 1297? Why do you think the clans were so divided amongst one another, even though they were part of the same blood?”

 

I’ll be honest with you, dude, that is not a part of history that I’m that well versed in. I apologise. I should probably know more about it. Have you got any recommendations, Jake? DM me any books you recommend about. [chuckling] Yeah, like 13th century British history.

 

I mean, that’s interesting. I’d like to know, but honestly, I’m not the man. I’m not the man for the question, I’ll be honest with you. Hyper lad says:

 

“Do do you subscribe to the specific meta-ethical position? And do you connect it up to your applied White nationalist ethics?”

 

This is kind of a bit of a broad question, like, do I subscribe to a specific meta-ethical position? I would say yes. Does the audience at this point want to hear me spurg out for half an hour about this particular subject? I don’t really think so.

 

I think I answered the question a bit earlier, though, where I said to me, this is beyond ethics. This is also ultimately about survival. Before we can even have an ethical discussion, survival must be guaranteed, our survival as a people.

 

But, yeah, I really do lean towards a kind of romanticist particularism in my moral outlook. I don’t like these kind of rationalist, universalist, egalitarian systems of moral rules. To me, the love of my people and my love of all that is great and noble, but my love of my family, of my blood, of my people. That’s really what guides me as a person. And I derive from the principles of loyalty and honour to that which I love and that to whom I feel obligated by bonds of blood. And that to me is really what defines what I think makes my life either a good life, or a bad life. How well, I honour that rather than the abstract ethical principles.

 

So yeah, to me, like loyalty and honour to your people and to, particularly to your family to your blood, like if you get married, you have children, but also to your parents, to your siblings. That to me is really like the essence of what makes you a good man, and your loyalty to your friends, like the people that you swear oaths to, that you’re going to be brothers and struggle together. To me that’s really what ethics is about is like how much you honour that as opposed to I don’t subscribe to universalistic notions of human rights or these kinds of things or get into like these Kantian de-ontological arguments I just don’t really subscribe to that position.

 

Yeah, I think that’s basically it for the Superchats. I hope you guys enjoyed the show. We got a lot of views on Twitter so I’m definitely going to keep streaming these on Twitter because almost 6,000 people tuned in at various points to watch the Twitter stream. But we still had a solid Rumble audience like usual as well. So I mean that just expands the audience of the show.

 

So yeah, I guess that will be the end of the show. Thanks for watching. Tune in next time. And yeah, just White fucking power!

 

And like I said, the people that sent those Entropy Superchats, I’m sorry, they literally refreshed. I’ll try to dig them out. If not DM me, I don’t want to leave you guys hanging. We’ll read them out next week. And yeah, good night.

 

[2:50:25]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee & Rumble Comments

top

[ODYSEE COMMENTS as of Sat, Sep 28, 2024 = 250]

@katana17
Just now
[Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following:
• Now hosting a live stream on Twitter/X for the first time.
• Recent activism and interviews, including one with a young Australian influencer/YouTuber, Max Caruso.
• They criticize Nick Fuentes’ views
on their street activism tactics.
• Argue for the importance of militant street activism to recruit and inspire supporters.
• The need for white nationalism and racial loyalty: “We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race.”
• Criticize attempts at political alliances with non-white groups.
• Discuss recent Australian political events, including a politician’s comments on Abo “Welcome” ceremonies.
• Argue that White people need to “stop White flighting and start fighting back” against immigration.
• Criticize conservative politics and argue for more radical action.
• The differences between American and Australian politics and nationalism, “White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia.”
• Criticize Muslim immigration and Islamic views.
• Importance of aesthetics and looking “cool” in political activism. “Looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics.”
• The need to appeal to women supporters.
• Discuss historical figures like Hitler and philosophical concepts related to their ideology.
• Criticize “multiracial alliance retards” and argue for racial separatism.
• Discuss the concept of freedom and its relation to racial identity. “Freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. No, you’re free because you are loved by …
Less

Rod O’Quinn
3 days ago
I’m glad to hear that Joel has renounced the church of Satan.

@OneTwo88
5 days ago
Yall gotta square away Tacitus calling German tribes, basically, niggers, with the way he describes their behavior, and then how whites CONVERT to Roman Catholicism and flip and build the best civilization the planet has seen.
Idk if Joel is some pagan larper now, but I was asatru before I reverted back to the ONLY FAITH and if you legit want truth there is only one place to find it. Everything else is noise.

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago(edited)
people like fuentes and logos revealed love talking shit about prowhites who engage in activism while they do nothing except intellectually self fellate

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago
when true strong white men take over people like fuentes and logos revealed must be punished for their subversive Jewish behavior and division of the movement

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago(edited)
daily reminder, logos revealed is a subversive half Asian gay Jew and just another fuentes, same goes for tonitus, that spic dick rider friend of his

kybermancer
5 days ago(edited)
Informative stream, I learnt quite a lot.

NR88
5 days ago
You like Nick?? He IS a confirmed homosexual with OBVIOUS homosexual tendencies. His following is artificial and botted AS FUCK! The metrics have never added up. You know what else doesn’t add up?? How Nick was able to avoid any punishment let alone jail time for agitating and encouraging J6. This guy is a twink pile of shit who’s so terrified of vag that he literally says “having sex with a woman is gay.” Lastly he’s a Mexican test tube baby who frequents cartoon movies while wearing the merch (Minions) alone.

4
1

@ozarkntndaredevil
5 days ago
Anglo-Celtic Pride Worldwide

Earthling Carl
6 days ago
Real masculinity clearly terrifies Nick.

3
0

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
always a pleasure to hear their points of view. these men will make history, im sure.

Hide replies
TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago
i think they already have

1
0
Lampshade Denier
7 days ago
Fuentes is a faggot.

8
3
Hide replies

@ozarkntndaredevil
5 days ago
imagine having the resources he has and not using it to have the biggest family you can have. He claims to be Catholic but all the hardcore TradCaths have 10 plus kids. he truly is a faggot

1
1
Earthling Carl
7 days ago
Yeah, the pro-Palestine stuff was always a dead end when you have to ally with brown people who hate you.

8
1
rosco1314
7 days ago
Brilliant show again lads far Bonnie Scotland 14

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
gn Joel, ava good one

0
2

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
WFP

The Pork Report
8 days ago
GREAT LIVESTREAM, THANK YOU ALL! WFP O/

Randall_Waffen
8 days ago
𝙒𝙁𝙋!! o/

SovereignSaint
8 days ago
wfp

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
thanks for the stream lads o/

DOLO
8 days ago
o/

Lon Awfully
8 days ago
i think the only things we have is the 1st and 2nd amnds that we dint even utilize properly

1
0
danzimmons
8 days ago
we got murrican’s like multi millionaire Feduentes

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Australia is kind of like a testing ground to see what they can get away with in Europe and the U.S..

The Pork Report
8 days ago
In America, the Democratic Party has entrenched political machines in the large cities. They’ve been in NY, Philly, Chicago, etc., since the 1800s. They steal every election.

3
0
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
the cities are full of negroes who overwhelmingly vote left.

3
0
Show reply
danzimmons
8 days ago
^^^

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@danzimmons
He’s such a cunt. That recent interview…. Utterly spineless.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Yes he is & is also considered the best the uk has to offer

danzimmons
8 days ago
nigel the nigger mirage is the epitome of controlled opposition

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 days ago
American k-mart

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the uk is the new north korea

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
fuggn tellim big joe

danzimmons
8 days ago
the nigger worship is unreal

3
0
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
its like a religion

2
0
The Pork Report
8 days ago
True, Tom, there are a lot of lazy asses everywhere.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
what month so i can get me balloons ready

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
10% Partaaaaaay? We’ve been doing that for centuries

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Why no white community push’s for a month dedicated to them there worried that others find it racist

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
The U.S. is the land of the fake home of the gay.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
You chaps don’t have cockerells. YET.

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Who thinks Israel had nothing to do with the explosion in Beruits harbor?

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
Free of the brave

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Nons are parasites.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

@LandOfTheFakeHomeOfTheGay
o/

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

DOLO
8 days ago
Based

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
more cucked

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
they’re becoming more Christ like

DOLO
8 days ago
Arianism is like Gnosticism i think.

@SammichLubber
8 days ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
I concur.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Promoting a product to peoples needs at least 3 mass advertisements.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
if the carpenter cant have a house no one should, enjoy the dung huts and rag doors

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Carpenters can build houses but should they afford one?

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Overton Window.

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Return Triguboff to China. Apparently he was born there.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
nice

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
White history month = August On this day, 19th August 1934, the German public voted 90% in favour of Adolf Hitler becoming Fuhrer (Leader) of Germany, combining the powers of Chancellor and President, President Paul von Hindenburg having died in his bed earlier that month, in a referendum.

2
0

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
if u oppose the jew it means u’r helping the jew = if u oppose faggotry u’r a homo. retard logic

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago
https://occidentaldissent.com/

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Occidental Observer – screen shot

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
There’s a video going around of the joo who runs Blackrock openly stating they intend to fund ngos that bring in millions of nonWites into White nations.

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 days ago
1965 to 1970

Land of the Fake – Home of the Gay
8 days ago
$5.00
Thanks for being based lads – these morning shows are awesome o/

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the latest nigel farage clip

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
hope he’s not talking about the Burt Colucci NSM

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Follow FortyTwo from Ireland.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

danzimmons
8 days ago
the jew is running the world do to their backing of the three Abrahamic religions but im not converting to jewdaism.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
thanks guys o/

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Do paki’s want there kids chopping there dicks & tits off

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
IQ snob

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the more gay we can make a country the more paki’s will run off

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
I had a Muslim from Morocco tell me that we’re all born Muslim and that those of us who don’t go to mosque we are apostate

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
we don’t need islam

DOLO
8 days ago
You’re meant to put allah above everything, even your own family.

The Pork Report
8 days ago
muslims are sleazy liars, all of them.

3
0

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
its a total cop out

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
They practice stabbing you when your back is turned here in NZ

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
ok this one time mate

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
I knew a girl with that name or very similar who I believe was ethnically Irish.

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
haha, I’ve combat experience so I feel I could be useful

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Collett, JFG, Duke et al were mentioned in that case.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
yeh theres alot of faggitry that goes on like that in the uk

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
but seriously u better not be a coke head formworker

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
fuk off were full. lol jokes

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
$2.00
Moira is an anglicization of an Irish name, Máire, which is Mary. I’m an Irish buck moving to Australia next year. Can I become apart of the movement?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
More

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
I have all the court transcribes for future ref.

DOLO
8 days ago
JK Rowling feminism

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Every time

Temulent
8 days ago

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago

@danzimmons
You have much more in common with your Christian ancestors than you do with your “pagan” ancestor who were defeated a millennia ago

danzimmons
8 days ago
White judeo crease chin’s would apologize to the muslims

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
reminds me of the mike enoch John fashcroft debate about working with others over seas

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Ik. Leave it for later, please.

DOLO
8 days ago
Rockwell liked X because he was a separatist. He didn’t demand access to white people.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
He won’t learn because he is a nefarious actor, his recent actions proved this.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
they weren’t in Germany tho

Vettekid1488
8 days ago

@danzimmons
Go off King

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
Not now, please.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Freyer’s day tomorrow

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Someone should teach NNR the purpose of street activism But saying that he don’t believe in free speech

danzimmons
8 days ago
epic rant

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Frei

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
fight fire with fire as they say

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

SovereignSaint
8 days ago
conq or be conqed white boy

Temulent
8 days ago
when it’s inescapable

Temulent
8 days ago
conflict avoidance, yes. relevant topic

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Interesting how slave ships have ties to NZ

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
niceness as weakness

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
kick their ass? scare them?

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
how do you fight back against a bunch of third worlder takeover of your town?

@AngryRetroGamer
8 days ago
“aboriginal and torres strait islander applicants are encouraged to apply”. Problem is, abos don’t work.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I’ve gleaned some great ‘recipes’ while changing my electricity, so there’s that.

danzimmons
8 days ago
the least the player’s could do is turn their back on the anti White bullshite speaker’s

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
I registered to vote as a black man in the past. Got funny looks at the dmv.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
I’m all for AFL Walkout.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@DawnBrowning
LOL “Thank you, please come again” the national slogan.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Soon it’ll be “Welcome to 7/11 Country”

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Which is why we were dispersed in the 1st place.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
That’s (((democracy))).

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Been that way in NZ for over 130 years. All along the way policies no one wanted or asked for, rejected, implemented anyway.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
problem is they have infinite funds because they steal our money and give it to themselves, and our enemies

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
It’s not the indian government, it’s your own that imports them. And the fuckers have the gall to steal the fruits of your labour in broad daylight to do.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the jews are gunning for an end game. they are going hard and we have to respond by going harder

scoobyburn
8 days ago
kalergi on warp speed

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
it’s Camp of the Saints in real life

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
The new Student visa scheme is as bad as 20,000 Haitians being dumped in Springfield, OHIO.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
probably a few car payments

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Morning fellas.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
i dont even know if they bury their dead

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@DawnBrowning
The (((state))) invites them worse still uses our taxes to import them, and we have no say in the matter

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
meanwhile they get to benefit from the fruits of the white man’s accomplishments there

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Most of them need to welcome themselves to country.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Likewise if we don’t welcome the chinks and pajeets…..

DOLO
8 days ago
lol

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
he said before cook for BC lol nerd

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
millennium of molestation

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
years*

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the 4th race…Australoids are the lowest IQ people on this earth

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Abos are a lower species. Next they’ll claim they were in Australia for millions of years.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
they say the human race has been around for 250 thousand to 100 thousand

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
doing what?

scoobyburn
8 days ago
BC banger

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
ima sent this auto correction to Madagascar

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
are why they made us Velcro bruz

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
I’m low IQ I can’t even tie my shoe

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
yeah lispy fags gtfo

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
nrl is perfect example of replacement

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
im just a bognat

Good Gravy
8 days ago
No shame in Wignat

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
Joel just described me to a T

Good Gravy
8 days ago
Oh God, don’t tell me you’re Groypers.

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
women at Nick’s rallies “who’s the boi?”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@deathcamp_counselor
(((women’s magazines)))
More

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
women will go with whoever appears to be the victor and hollywood has made the primitive ape nigger the victor

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
true ccg my misses punched me in the face to see if the stories where true, we now have two boys

@Moonman
8 days ago
men with watch collections

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
women are not the same creature as they were in the 30s and 40s

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Reduction is not reversal. Two steps forward, one step back is a jew trick. You will always hear about reduction of immigration, you will never hear send the fuckers back.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
a good joke has a element of truth to it

danzimmons
8 days ago
of course nickel Feduentes attack’s Joel, because Joel didn’t take the $500 N Bitcoin payments like Feduentes did

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
Wigger Nation supremacy

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@Mr_K_Ultra
“ignant” is from on Chris Rocks presentation “Niggas Vs Black People” where he incorrectly said ‘ignorant’.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
no they just think were hot lol

Good Gravy
8 days ago
Well I don’t give any credence to what that closeted Mexican has to say. He’s a joke

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
but a term for white nationalists

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
I heard it was supposed to be similar to “ignat” which is like calling someone ignoramus

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Women will put themselves in danger to find a man who will save them. It’s a sexual selection strategy that has sadly been exploited by those who seek to destroy us.

@Moonman
8 days ago

@GaelicGlory
Clann Éireann look promising

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
you guy should get some drone boiz to buzz around at rallies

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
3 % of the European colonists in America fought off King George’s army

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@sparkofspirit
Yes its innate for it is a necessary survival strategy of a species. It takes 24/7 brainwashing to subvert that.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
real racism comes from the heart

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
That its correct

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
These white guys who are effectively deradicalization agents are just wanting to feather their nests and avoid risk… At the same time, willing to give it all away for security.

@filled_soda
8 days ago
$5.00
I say I’ve catching up to do as there are some episodes missing on Odysee. I wish there was something like your organisation here. All those people died during The Troubles…now they’re giving it all away.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the more radical the better

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
Bob Katter

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
catbois and dildos nick. so trad

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
“street activism is dumb, liking women is gay”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
If he’s a normal white american, america is fucked

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
Race first only answer

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
Ireland is radicalising as well

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
it’s like that in the UK too for the most part

BobMatthews
8 days ago
ricans are psyopped

BobMatthews
8 days ago
we amer

@filled_soda
8 days ago
$10.00
Glad to catch another stream live here in Belfast. I’ve some catching up to do, over on Rumble.
14/88

@Moonman
8 days ago
he’s comfortable

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
we created them already, we need to rip them back from (((their))) hands

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
the only way we get the levers of power is create our own.

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
The system is failing

@WeWuzKrangz
8 days ago
they are going to frame you in the most horrible light anyway. if you are going to walk on ice, might as well dance

The Crucible 01
8 days ago
exactly ^

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
Nick doesn’t understand Australians and our Fuck Off We’re Fullism

The Crucible 01
8 days ago
gd i hate nick so much

@Moonman
8 days ago
He’s smug. I can tell I wouldn’t get along IRL

SmackUrApocolips
8 days ago

@Moonman
he appears to be struggling not to rub his hands together .

Ngrngrngr
8 days ago
thats kind of the issue… nick believes in working within the political system

Ngrngrngr
8 days ago
we’re never going to have political reform nick

@Moonman
8 days ago
Nick gives off slimy merchant vibes

2
1
SmackUrApocolips
8 days ago
yes , I was thinking nick was awfully snuggly with catboy .

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
who’s the guy Tom mentioned? Godfather of Australian nationalism?

scoobyburn
8 days ago
slag

@lewpers
8 days ago
When you have a bee infestation you don’t spend time swatting individual bees, you take out the hive. The hive is Israel. Swatting Palestinians is not a useful focus. Remove Israel, then mudslimes can go home. It’s not difficult.

Smokey
8 days ago
it’s a short video – 13 minutes?

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
okay thanks for the link. i’ll check it out later.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@Smokey
skip the first like 7 minutes. It’s just trash

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
thanks

Smokey
8 days ago
anyone have a link to the video?

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

scoobyburn
8 days ago
comprehension is above most people

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
thanks

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
young Youtuber

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@Smokey
Max Caruso or someone

Smokey
8 days ago
Just got here. Who’s he talking about?

tropic
8 days ago
o/

@AngryRetroGamer
8 days ago
I see all they longed hair guys (Joel, Mickle, etc) cut their hair short after the Brisbane rally.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
The video Thomas was in mostly sucked. the first half was him walking around eating Hungry Jacks

@Moonman
8 days ago
hey guys

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
i

australian man
8 days ago
n

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
first

@filled_soda
8 days ago
I’ve some catching up to do

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@katana17
Thanks!

@katana17
8 days ago
For whatever reason a few shows are missing on Odysee. They are all there on Rumble though.

@filled_soda
8 days ago
Is there no video of last week’s show? Maybe I’m missing something. Behind a paywall, maybe?

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@katana17
Thanks. I couldn’t find it

@katana17
8 days ago
Last week’s show:

Joel Davis – We’ll Talk About the News but Let’s Be Honest You’re Here for the Tangents – Sep 13, 2024 – Transcript

[RUMBLE COMMENTS as of Sat Sep 28, 2024 = 73]

Mike929497
1 week ago
I like Nick and Joel. if I had to pick a leader to follow it would have to be Joel though. Nick comes off as too weak and effeminate, although I agree with a lot of his ideas
23 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
I have the same thought brother. I grew up in the 80s. America had a brotherhood that is more expressed by the Aussies Joel, Blair & Thom. Nick needs to realize he was altered by Jewish subversion. He doesn’t have a band of brothers. Sneako, ye, Myron & even Tate do not count for they are “brothers” just as long as we are cool feeding them our White sisters & daughters. I hope Nick wakes up as he grows up. Hopefully he has felt the push back to the Joel critiques. We need them all. WP! -half Yank/half Confederate
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Mike929497
1 week ago
I grew up in the 00s but it was still a lot tougher than what we see today. we fought and looked up to masculinity. there is no unity without White unity first! WP
5 likes

kirodarkpaw
1 week ago
Spot on
2 likes

Washington88
4 days ago
Catboy fuentes is a fed
0 likes

PeterboroughLad
1 week ago
fucking jews
18 likes

ballsagna
1 week ago
Re: Nick’s silly homoerotic characterization of a “charismatic leader” — a touch ironic… Not due to Ali/Catboy past, but because: If Joel’s fraternal respect for Tom as a man elder + proven leader is gay… Please describe thousands of childless virgins who worship Nick + unthinkingly get every single opinion straight from his mouth (and laughably paying him money to be publicly mocked and belittled).
14 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
ballsagna
1 week ago
Also LOL at Groypers calling ppl like us wignats. Them: “Black women are fiiiine. We’re not racist we don’t hate black pp, we love everybody we’re Christian! Us: “Theyre all going back to Africa”
11 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
Well said Brother. I’m a yank/confederate from an earlier time. I straddle the Tom And Nick zeitgeist. Tom et al is right in their Chadness, Nick is right in his misfit atomized & cucked White boy-Man rebellion. Nick is intelligent talented, but he is still a student in ways he doesn’t even know. He was Cucked by our nation whether he knows it or not. He mocks strength training, diet wisdom and is surrounded by non-White “brother” e-celebs. I’m with Joel n crew. They are more fully White & Man than Fuentes can comprehend.
7 likes

solaro
1 week ago
infighting is a jewish hobby
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ballsagna
2 days ago
By that metric, Nick should get a kippah considering how many times he punches right + punches white during his streams. Guys like Joel and HT have responded civilly to keep the peace and he just keeps going. So frustrating.
0 likes

vigilantejustice23
1 week ago
Also, these guys who call you “low brow” come across as sniveling weak fagg0ts to heterosexual women of ALL class backgrounds, whether lower, middle, or upper. Does Nick have any concept as to how he and his movement look in comparison to your guys’?? They call you “low class” to deflect from the fact that they appear to be dysgenic freaks who are too physically and mentally weak to protect the women and children in their community. They claim they’re more “professional” than you guys, but I highly doubt most groypers even have much professional success – they’re just castrated cowards and pretend it makes them “civilized.” Why would any woman be inspired to procreate with THAT?! The groypers complain about white women endlessly because they have a slave morality, and it’s annoying – this is one of the reasons why they betray us for and identify with genetic inferiors like Myron Gaines and Tate. They don’t have an authentic White masculine identity or any dignity. Women aren’t attracted to these guys for a good reason. They’ll say it’s because of feminism when really, it’s their own cowardice and inferiority that repulses us. The fact that we’re not into effeminate boys who seem like they’re 15 years old is because we’re not lesbian pedos lmao, not because of “feminism.” Groypers resent nature’s hierarchy
9 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
Yeah, these are some valid points and criticisms of the groyper-faction. Ultimately, I’m grateful for whatever useful contributions to groypers can offer to the world-wide struggle of preserving our blood. Groypers tend to believe infiltrating mainstream GOP is a viable solution, and maybe there are some gains to be had in that approach, sure, but I moreso agree w/ what Tom and Joel usually say about how political-electoral efforts are not as effective as political-activism efforts of idea-spreading at street level and influencing the culture in contagious interpersonal sense. Politics is downstream of culture anyway. So even if groypers infiltrate political organizations (which of course, is still a good thing), it still doesn’t steer and influence the mult-cult poison at it’s source. And the source is how ordinary white ppl think in terms of their lack of sense of self and lack of dignity because of modern pop-culture, broken spirits, and dumbing down of mass-culture, etc. Street activism is more visceral, dignity-restoring, and epigenetic-subliminal in an effective lasting positive way. The active-club culture will also help clean up poor thinking and poor health among men, which in turn will reinvigorate healthy procreation rates and tangible quality of life for white men and white women.
2 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
Well stated. Nick needs to take a seat and learn. Perhaps he will continue to get back-stabbed enough by these “alliances” in order to find himself alone and empty so that he can suffer in order to break through his screaming ego.
1 like

cozydissident1
3 days ago
Nick doesn’t care about what women think of him, and neither does any great man. Your mentality is how White men fell so bad. Women submit to power, not men who desperately try to gain their approval under a system in which the power structure is opposed to them.
0 likes

EnglandAwake
1 week ago
I’m an engineer. I’m high IQ. Nick attracts weaklings and cowards that feel comfortable staying anonymous online “groyping”, in a nation with the first amendment.
9 likes

katana17
1 week ago
Here’s last week’s show. [Joel Davis – We’ll Talk About the News but Let’s Be Honest You’re Here for the Tangents – Sep 13, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/15/joel-davis-well-talk-about-the-news-but-lets-be-honest-youre-here-for-the-tangents-sep-13-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: • Recent Australian government moves on internet censorship and social media age limits. • Certain type of women being attracted to official positions in HR, government, etc., and having a particular appearance and manner. • The lack of discipline and schools where even in primary schools teachers are being attacked. • The psychology of leftists regarding envy. • Haitians being dumped in Springfield, Ohio. • Criticize a father whose son was killed by a Haitian immigrant for saying he wished a White man had killed his son instead. • The Swedish government’s plan to pay immigrants large sums to leave Sweden. • Express admiration for the Ku Klux Klan, calling them “true fucking heroes of the aryan race.” • Discuss Greg Johnson being gay and criticize homosexuality in general. • Talk about women cheating and social media’s role in relationships. • Discuss libertarianism and criticize libertarian views
on immigration and economics. • Discuss the Chinese government, drawing some parallels to fascism. • “Hitler was willing to, you know, he was a strategic politician, like any good politician, looking out for the interests of their nation.” • “Homophobia actually in, like, every. Pretty much every, like, culture ever in, like, human history.” • “Jews are probably the least homophobic.” • “We need the Klan. We need to bring back the Klan.” • “White people want things like justice and fairness and freedom and, you know, honor and respect and rights and liberties.” • “Haiti is disgusting. And again, they have the legacy of White genocide.” ..
8 likes

Delete
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah that was low of what Nick said. So called friend huh, but yeah I don’t watch him anymore. He’s not Pro White, someone who is Pro White doesn’t listen to monkey music, and isn’t friend’s with minorities.
8 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Washington88
4 days ago
Kanye west Kang
2 likes

BB12345
1 week ago
Nicky literally worships Stalin. His own admission. Check out his old vdo.
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Washington88
4 days ago
Because he received money from Kremlin and iran
0 likes

bigbuttwhole
1 week ago
Fundamentally Nick misrepresents and strawmans people he disagrees with, although that is a tactic everyone uses, it is poor form against fellow White Nationalists who are amicable with him
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
bigbuttwhole
1 week ago
In fact Tom straight up slanders and lies about Nick shortly into this show
0 likes

rg0dfrey
1 week ago
Joel is similar to a more manly more based more focused Nick.
7 likes

StreamAddict
1 week ago
God Nick is so annoying. Hes the one who started the first optics war and divided the movement up after Charlottesville. Everyone who didnt meet his standard of optics he would attack and then everybody divided on those lines….optics cucks vs wignats lol. Even Anglin, the biggest wignat sperg on the internet, jumped in on Nicks side and started calling everyone neo nazis lol…I couldnt believe it…like we all just wouldnt notice his complete flip flop.. Oh God and then the woman question thing, they then had to force a division over that too. And that weird fucker weev that ended up being a jew lol. I dont trust these people anymore, we got more gayops going on here than anywhere on earth, so I just assume someones some kind of bad actor if all they do is divisive shit.
5 likes

BillClintonBitMyLip
1 week ago
Thomas has the right idea. Just shaving it all off, Joel.
4 likes

Nickdorshimer
1 week ago
w joel
4 likes

mrwordsworth
1 week ago
Comedy is the crucible of all society, and that is why the Jews use it to their end . they have hijacked us through it.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
So true. Very astute observation
0 likes

Kroninn
SubSupporter
1 week ago
I appreciate what you guys do, I like that you’re serious. I’m surrounded by nons and most of the white men don’t seem to take anything seriously, but themselves. They have no ideological basis from which they navigate the world. They are subjectively minded, feminine. You walk the walk, not just talk the talk. WP.
3 likes

xSeparatist
1 week ago
Around the 30-minute mark, Joel raises a solid point. I have refrained from joining the NSN primarily due to my own limited resources, and I believe others may be in a similar situation. Nevertheless, I am committed to supporting the movement passively in any way I can, and I have full confidence in the abilities of Tom, Jacob Hersant, Blair, and Joel.
3 likes

AussiePermaculture
1 week ago
you three are legendary and inspirational
3 likes

AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
o/ I’ll gladly die w/ truth and patriotism on my lips than to perish as a subservient sell-out nation-traitor groveling to modern dystopia. I’ve got such immense respect for all three of you. Australia is a great nation, I love your guys history. It’s righteous and very colonial.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
StreamAddict
1 week ago
Id honesty rather see a movement like this in America than Nicks AF or MAGA. Eight years of this shit and its now gayer than ever. Trump talking about “bringing in a LOT of people” …but dont worry, it will be legal…This is why we have to be explicitly pro-white and open about why we dont want them here, we dont want them here cuz theyre not us and this is OUR country, not theirs…Thats it, its that simple. If we dont do that then we end up not having a real argument when they pull shit like this. Dont worry, they were just eating the local wildlife, not peoples pets, thats disinfo, glad we cleared that up cuz lol. Or like in the UK with the nog stabber….well actually, he was a “Welsh” Christian and not a muslim immigrant so you should be fine with the stabbing, he was one of our stabbers lol…fucking conservatives just have nothing to say to that in response, they just sit there dumbfounded like oh fuck how do I express that I just dont wanna live with these savages without actually saying it?
1 like

BradC1988
1 week ago
White Fucking Power! o/
2 likes

proloveantigov
1 week ago
My biggest criticism of Fuentes is his worship of the Catholic Church. Proven time and time again that pedofilia is rampant in the ranks.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Fuentes is more of an Americanist than Catholic. If he supports Neo Stalinist Jewtin Putin he can’t be Catholic. And its no coincidence that the JudeoMasonic corporate media never seems to attack atheists, pagans or Protestants ! The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Westerners pay the price of collective stupidity. http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/08/25/six-jewish-companies-own-96-of-the-world-1 (ie 96% of media) Everybody knows that the child abuse accusations on the Catholic Church was done by the jew to distract and deflect from the systemic child abuse by jewish rabbis. Why don’t you provide a list of convicted Catholic Priests? https://aresix.wordpress.com/2010/04/03/the-passover-media-attacks-on-the-catholic-church
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ballsagna
2 days ago
In a debate with Destiny, Nick admits in plain terms that he is not only a Catholic before an american, but that Americanism is heresy in the Catholic Church. Video: https://x.com/martinez_clips/status/1801903466027110744?s=46&t=Qk1ItwqItc7cmzxqf-te7A
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
Firstly, Martinez is a crypto Jew. Destiny is a libtard J$w. Fuentes? has lots of contradictions. Vatican II = Babylonian captivity. Vatican II/Novus Ordo = Babylonian captivity/counterfeit Church/founded by Masonic antipope John XXIII, Six Protestant advisors at V2 Council and KGB agents disguised as Orthodox clergy also participated! http://www.jesusmariasite.org/freemasonry-and-the-protestantization-of-the-catholic-church/ In 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt gave his famous “Four Freedoms” speech. In that speech, FDR set forth a vision for the reengineering of societies around the globe. The means was psychological warfare, involving the manipulation of ideas, words and symbols to divide target societies and convince these societies of the ideology that formed America. The most important society America targeted was the Roman Catholic Church. Media mogul Henry R. Luce, founder and publisher of enormously influential magazines like Time and Life, used the CIA’s doctrinal warfare program to turn the Catholic Church into a promoter of American ideas. This struggle reached its culmination at the Second Vatican Council with the promulgation of the document Declaration on Religious Liberty. Catholic doctrine did not change, but, defeated at the Council, the Americanists used their media power to win the battle over who got to interpret the Council with significant consequences for both the world and the Catholic Church, whose leadership came to espouse the doctrines of Liberalism something its leadership had condemned just a few years earlier. https://www.amazon.com/John-Courtney-Murray-American-Proposition/dp/0929891155 Catholics unveil Jewish plot – caused PROTESTant Revolution The Catholic Gazette (London) February 1936 https://educate-yourself.org/cn/The-Jewish-Peril-and-The-Catholic-Church-1936-The-Catholic-Gazette.shtml
0 likes
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
The Protestant Deformation in England by William Cobbett. https://www.exclassics.com/protref/protint.htm https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Influence-Christian-Reform-Movements/dp/1590451600 The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints. Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement. Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I] This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom. The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France. https://fitzinfo.net/2014/02/26/alex-jones-freemasonry-and-the-cult-of-constitution/ The J$wish Revolutionary spirit of America: Bastille Key given to George Washington https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/bastille-key/
0 likes
R9C2
1 week ago
Great analysis and breakdown of why NJF is incorrect. Continue to inspire.
2 likes

kirodarkpaw
1 week ago
Nick is a joke, you guys are the real deal. Thank you for giving me hope that we can actually win this.
2 likes

TTFOLEY19830608
1 week ago
I’m from UK and followed you guys online for years as we are going through the same journey for years now. I actually care about you lads totally.Nick said he don’t care about Australians (white ) sums nick up totally.he is anti white to anyone who is a real alpha nationalist and want a Monopoly on ideology
2 likes

PeroErcegovac
6 days ago
On the Indian issue I am starting to believe that the COVID lockdowns was either created, or utilised on time, to create the mechanism for the transfer of massive amounts of sub-continental Pajeets throughout the European world and her colonies. It is not just Australia suffering this invasion, it is all over Europe and her colonies from Lithuania to Croatia, from Canada to Australia. And all from 2021 onwards. Firstly, they create here in Central Europe jobs that never existed before due to the people not being lazy and having a culture of street life, i.e., Glovo and Wolt food deliveries. Then they bring over a slave coolie class of men to do the deliveries. And Bob’s your uncle every small Central and Eastern European country receives over 200,000 Pajeets in three years. You guys in Australia are to receive 750,000, Canada received two million… And every single time this is facilitated after the visit of a country’s minister or premier to India. This is not a coincidence. I know of a prominent Bulgarian NS who has looked into this and he believes this to be the case. Some food for thought.
2 likes

AngloAmerican777
5 days ago
I like Nick and Joel and Steve Laws and Mark Collett, Different people have different strategies and there are beefs that will inevitably happen but we’re all going against the same enemy at the end of the day. Cheers to all our people.
2 likes

AusFascist1488
5 days ago
Got all my boys onto your shit Joel, keep it up mate.
2 likes

ccharles1488
1 week ago
Joel I couldn’t even follow you on X cause it said sensitive content they literally won’t let people follow your X account lol
1 like

AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
1:00 minute in when Tom elaborates on how their public-street activism doesn’t require the flag anymore, even though said in jest, granted yes it’s true, point made, but i still affirm and insist the flags are still necesssary for decorum, signaling and the metaphysics of the substance of the thing
1 like

Irishman2023
1 week ago
Twenty twenty four. Top stream guys!!
1 like

fklmvjaflkm2
1 week ago
black bloc yacht is so funny
1 like

Gussmathiassen
1 week ago
Blair is always just pushing to end the show
1 like

BungusFuccbone
1 week ago
Women being interested in your politics is relevant because men want to get laid. If women hate the message and a man stands behind the message…she ain’t gonna fuck him.
1 like

RedFascist88
1 week ago
Tom drinking raw milk out the bottle is a straight white vibe.
1 like

evan1122
6 days ago
The nietzsche stuff is a dead end, I’m so over it. “Be a sociopath bro, it’s life affirming!” Christianity or nothing. It’s the white man’s religion.
1 like

CockTortureEnjoyer
6 days ago
I like both you and Nick. I don’t enjoy the infighting. He was partly wrong about the UK riots tho. He seemed convinced it all happened to justify a war with Iran and that Tommy Robinstein was a big part of it. Both of those were wrong. He should admit to that.
1 like

Motion937
6 days ago
BLUE EYES MATTER
1 like

ForOurPeople
6 days ago
This is why the Right never wins. Too much infighting (and government infiltration)! Everyone is always going to have their own opinions and ideas, but what everyone needs to remember is that WE are ALL on the same (White) side.
1 like

Motion937
6 days ago
BLUE EYES MATTER It isn’t just about culture. Race matters because Blue Eyes Matter.
1 like

ProvingNihil
5 days ago
Tom and Joel I 100% agree with you on what you both said at the end about some Americans, as an American myself you couldn’t have said that any better. You two were right on point!
1 like

14Ragnar88
1 week ago
Being a Christian of any brand and being a white nationalist is an oxymoron. Christians worship a Jewish desert wizard, pretend to drink his blood, turn the other cheek, think everyone’s equal and then cope by saying he was Caucasian when he actually wasn’t even real and he was made up to get gentiles to worship the Jewish god.
0 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
averagefreedomenjoyer
1 week ago
yep Christianity was designed to cuck Europeans mentally.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KingChun
1 week ago
If they manged to subvert the European continent to such a degree. Then it’s over, we’re not winning against a near omnipotent force than can mind control Europeans. Your whole argument falls flat when you realize, that this isn’t the case. You think the jews had some master god like plan for 2000 years to subvert the goyim. That’s comic book shit.
1 like

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
I’ve shared your thoughts before. Although I do think Christianity can be based if we want it to as it use to be. We could be like the Muzz where they say their religion is the final boss form of God. Christian’s has the same thought that Jews were stuck in the past therefore degenerate as they didn’t recognize Jesus as being God. Nick has a lot of Pharisees in him, like Christian in name only. I have hardly experienced the presence of Spirit in his countenance. I have personally felt and dwelt in communion with God via Jesus Love. It was weird, but beautiful and powerful. I haven’t perceived this from Nick. I don’t disparage his floundering stage of fake it till you make it. Pretentiousness has its place in learning like a child wielding a plastic hammer after seeing daddy do it for real. Practice has its place. Nick has to still stumble aka learn. o/
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
No banners needed
0 likes

Corkly
1 week ago
Yall tweakin in here. Like
0 likes

BossLurker
1 week ago
How many viewers were on X? I don’t see it
0 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
The first slaves in JudeoMasonic America were white! White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America White Cargo is the forgotten story of the thousands of Britons who lived and died in bondage in Britain’s American colonies. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, more than 300,000 white people were shipped to America as slaves. Urchins were swept up from London’s streets to labor in the tobacco fields, where life expectancy was no more than two years. Brothels were raided to provide “breeders” for Virginia. Hopeful migrants were duped into signing as indentured servants, unaware they would become personal property who could be bought, sold, and even gambled away. Transported convicts were paraded for sale like livestock. Drawing on letters crying for help, diaries, and court and government archives, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh demonstrate that the brutalities usually associated with black slavery alone were perpetrated on whites throughout British rule. The trade ended with American independence, but the British still tried to sell convicts in their former colonies, which prompted one of the most audacious plots in Anglo-American history. This is a saga of exploration and cruelty spanning 170 years that has been submerged under the overwhelming memory of black slavery. White Cargo brings the brutal, uncomfortable story to the surface. https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/0814742963?ref_=mr_referred_us_au_au TRUTH about the Irish – First slaves brought to the Americas – Forgotten History https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yljjCPOQf44 In the 1650’s 100,000 Irish children were sent by the English to the West Indies and Virginia as slaves. 52,000 Irish women, whose husbands had been killed by the English during the 1640s, were shipped as slaves to Barbados and Virginia and elsewhere. Most of the 500,000 Irish killed from 1641 to 1652 died at the hands of Oliver Cromwell’s highly financed troops. By the end of the British invasion of Ireland ..
0 likes

hueyvam123
2 days ago
Nick’s “what does Australia have to do with us” comment really clarifies his America First position. He’s not White first. He’s America First… including all the riff-raff that comes with that.
0 likes

katana17
1 day ago
Transcript of this show: [Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/20/joel-davis-the-purpose-of-street-activism-the-principle-of-race-and-the-politics-of-will-sep-19-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: • Now hosting a live stream on Twitter/X for the first time. • Recent activism and interviews, including one with a young Australian influencer/YouTuber, Max Caruso. • They criticize Nick Fuentes’ views
on their street activism tactics. • Argue for the importance of militant street activism to recruit and inspire supporters. • The need for white nationalism and racial loyalty: “We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race.” • Criticize attempts at political alliances with non-white groups. • Discuss recent Australian political events, including a politician’s comments on Abo “Welcome” ceremonies. • Argue that White people need to “stop White flighting and start fighting back” against immigration. • Criticize conservative politics and argue for more radical action. • The differences between American and Australian politics and nationalism, “White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia.” • Criticize Muslim immigration and Islamic views. • Importance of aesthetics and looking “cool” in political activism. “Looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics.” • The need to appeal to women supporters. • Discuss historical figures like Hitler and philosophical concepts related to their ideology. • Criticize “multiracial alliance retards” and argue for racial separatism. • Discuss the concept of freedom and its relation to racial identity. … more
0 likes

Delete
Huntercel
6 days ago
Joel, you should apologize to Nick
-2 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
RoseRock444
Supporter
6 days ago
Why?
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Huntercel
1 day ago
Nick promoted him, and was very diplomatic with him for months, even though he was mistaken, yet he just stabbed him in the back.
0 likes

Motion937
6 days ago
The reverse is true.
1 like

 

 

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript