Jacob Hersant: There needs to be no compromise on the Hate Crime Bill the Labor Party is trying to pass! Right now they’re trying to get support from the Liberals so that they can pass it. And there are people that are already celebrating as if somehow we have won. We have not won! The Labor Party has only made a small concession. Getting rid of one aspect of the Bill while keeping the vast majority of it. And that vast majority is some of the most damaging stuff there is. It’s going to completely destroy the way that policing and the justice system works in this country.

 

They’ve gotten rid of one little aspect to try and coax the Liberal Party into passing the vast majority of the hate crime stuff. Everybody hates these laws and yet they’re trying to do this little trick where the vast majority of it will pass anyway! The Labor Party are splitting the Bill so that the Greens will pass the gun aspects of it and they’re taking away just a little bit of it, of the hate crimes aspect of it so that the Liberal Party will pass it.

 

Now Advance have brought out a post saying:

 

“Breaking: Albanese has dropped his hate crime censorship laws. Massive win for Aussies. PM dumps Hate Speech laws.”

 

And as you can see there, it has 192,000 views. And Advance made another post here:

 

“Thanks to the thousands of Advance supporters who contacted their local MPs over Labor’s hate crime censorship laws. This win is yours! A Labor member of the committee said many of the last minute submissions appeared to be the result of lobbying by One Nation and conservative group Advance.”

 

So this is not true. The Hate Crime Bill has not been destroyed! It is still, 90% of it is still there. And the Labor Party is making a gambit so to try and coax the Liberal Party into supporting it and passing the vast majority of it. If we allow them to do this, we deserve to have our freedoms taken away! If we are going to be fooled like this, we deserve to live as slaves in this country.

 

And here you have idiots like Monica Smit:

 

“We won again. The government showed its hand and we learn that we are ready for whatever they throw at us.”

 

We have not won! That is what needs to get through people’s heads. We have not won! The Bill is going to be voted on Tuesday, and the Liberal Party hasn’t made it clear whether or not they’re going to vote for it or they’re going to vote against it.

 

So the Liberal Party needs to be pressured into not supporting these laws because they are draconian. And as unfortunate that the Greens and the Labor Party are going to pass through the gun laws. I get that people are upset about that, but we need to lament the guns later and focus on what is actually in the air. The Right-wing aren’t gonna have any influence over the Greens voting through these gun things, so it’s over.

 

But we do have influence over the Liberal Party and we need to pressure them to not pass the hate crimes aspect of this. The Hate Crime Bills is the most dangerous because it’s going to hold 15 year jail sentences over the heads of radical political activists that did nothing more than engage in political communication.

 

So it’s going to ban organisations and it’s going to expand. It’s not going to only be the National Socialist Network. Give it time and they’ll start banning other organisations that are inconvenient to the government’s agenda. This Bill alone is going to take away all of our political freedoms!

 

And not only that, these laws are bad enough, but they’re only going to expand as you see them constantly expand over the decades. They get one thing through and then give it five years, they’ll expand it, they’ll amend it. It’s going to make politics impossible for anyone on the outside of mainstream politics, whether that be on the Left or on the Right. It’s going to make politics impossible! Because the chilling effect this is going to have is going to make everyone so scared to do anything in this country. And then you’re going to be stuck with idiots. And like the people who run Advance who celebrate too early and may end up being the key people that make this Bill get passed because they celebrated too early! The Liberal Party backflipped on its decision and passed these hate crime laws. If that happens, it’s gonna be people like Monica Smit and Advance and all of these idiots that are to blame!

 

The main message we have to get out there is there is to be no compromise on these hate crime laws! The whole Bill needs to be shredded! We’re not going to be placated by them getting rid of one little aspect.
The whole thing needs to be gotten rid of and the people who thought that they could get away with these laws need to be humiliated!

 

Do not celebrate as if we’ve already won and don’t get distracted with all of these side issues. I see people posting about who the US Ambassador is going to be and other things. The whole future of politics, Right-wing politics, is at stake right now! And people are talking about the US ambassador. They’re talking about things that can be talked about any other day. We have two days to oppose this. The vote is going to be on Tuesday. You need to be spending all of your free time influencing these people.

 

So you need to be influencing, going and telling everybody that they should not be fooled by the fact that they’ve gotten rid of only one aspect of the hate crimes bill. You need to tell them that the vast majority of it is still going through and the Liberals might vote for it. And that the Liberal Party is going to be severely punished in the next election if they go through and destroy our criminal justice system and destroy policing in this country.

 

Because policing is going to go away from policing actual criminals. It already is like this where you have political policing, which is out of control, but that is going to expand beyond anything that we have previously seen. We’re going to have two tier justice in this country like we have never seen. We have to get across the message that the whole thing needs to be opposed! We cannot just be fighting it piecemeal, one little aspect or another aspect.

 

We need to take this seriously. We have two days. You need to be spending all of your free time trying to influence the Liberal Party, particularly because it’s the Liberal Party that will work with the Labor Party to bring forth these hate crime laws that are going to destroy any freedom we had left in this country. Any politics outside of the mainstream is going to be destroyed by this bill! You know, so lock in and make sure that everyone knows that our position as the Australian people is no compromise! Shred the entire bill!

 

[6:46]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/19/2026 = 3)

leibekohne
1 hour ago
“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.” ~ Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772 Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Magazine, Sep-Oct 2002 We intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed, not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed. https://birthofanewearthblog.com/the-jewish-agenda-to-destroy-the-white-race/
2
0

charliebrownau
3 hours ago
Gday We wont have Free Speech till the people have removed state mandated – Hate Speech 3 bills 2026 – Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024 – Surveillance Legislation Amendment Bill 2001 – 18c of Racial Discrimination Act 1995 – Racial Discrimination Act 1975 – Sex Discrimination act – State Mandated Equality of Opportunity – Remove State Mandated Affirm Action – Remove State Mandated Duluth Model (Men automatically guilty) – Remove State Mandated Multiculturalism – Remove State Mandated Diversity – Remove State Mandated Feminism No Fault Divorce Alimony Child Support Divorce Separation I would advocate to remove GST/VAT Welfare Income Tax I would advocate to remove funding/support for G20, Nato, UN, WEF, IMF Central Banks Overseas nations ‘aid’ funding PNG, NZ, China, Middle east funding Lower min wage back to $10 per hour Remove mandated paid ‘leave’ for holiday/sick days/pregnant Since at least 1936 the current ‘Government’ is actually a legal fiction which is registered with the American system The “Australian Government” is a registered corporation as is the ‘parties’ We need to go back to sourvien governance system in Australia They ALL need to be DISQUALIFIED under Section 44 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK. They are ALL sitting in treason as political parties and preferential voting is in direct contravention of our Constitution. Our Constitution came with a letters patent, meaning our constitution is indissoluble, it can’t be changed, altered or backdated unless the people are consulted via a referendum but it has been intentionally usurped since Federation that ALL past and present politician have/are sitting in treason. _________ Regards Charliebrownau * Email – charliebrownau@protonmail.com * Videos – https://www.matildatv.com/@charliebrownau * Videos – https://poast.tv/c/charliebrownau/videos * Telegram – https://t.me/s/Charliebrownau
1
0

fastnail
6 minutes ago
Remove all jews from Australia.
0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Jacob Hersant: So this is a video where I’m going to explain this new Bill that the Australian government is bringing out in the wake of the Bondi shooting where two Islamists went and shot a bunch of jewish people. And the jewish lobby has pressured the government to bring out these really extreme laws which practically nobody is happy about, really. Only the jews are really happy. Labor Party obviously draughted these laws on behalf of the jewish lobby. But everyone else seems pretty annoyed about it, so I’ll go through it. I haven’t seen any videos that comprehensively go through what the Bill says and what is so egregious and why it’s problematic. So I’ll do that in this video.

 

First I’ll give a disclaimer that I’m not a lawyer. No lawyer has gone through and talked about all of this stuff. So unfortunately I’m the best that you have. The only reason I’m interested in it is because it’s going to be affecting me and my organisation, the National Socialist Network. So that’s why I’m making this video.

 

I’ll be providing photos of the Exposure draught as I read it. I’ll also show the link so you can go read it yourself to make sure that I’m not misinterpreting it or I’m not making any mistakes. If I’m making a mistake, please message me, tell me how I’m wrong in my interpretation, and I’ll be happy to retract what I said and correct it for people, because I just want to try to give an honest assessment of what this law is and the effects it will have on society.

 

So this is a massive bill, they call it an Omnibus Bill. It is going to change a lot of things.

 

So a lot of its about to do with criminal law and hate speech. But it also does have some gun stuff. Not going to talk about the gun stuff because I don’t know much about guns. And this video is just going to be too long. I’m more interested and know more about the politics aspect of it and the hate crimes and hate speech and that aspect of it.

 

So that’s what I’m going to be talking about. I’m sure there’s someone that can talk about the gun aspect of it and in all likelihood the two are going to be split. The gun stuff will probably be chucked into its own Bill and the hate stuff will be bundled in its own bill.

 

I’m going to start off by talking about what this law does regarding hate and what they call “violent extremism, hate speech, hate crimes” and all the like. It’s all doublespeak. The bill’s called “Combating Anti-semitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026”. So in the title, they don’t even hide who it’s for. Obviously, on behalf of the jewish lobby, they’re the only ones that support this law currently. And because they have an outsized influence over Australia’s politics, that’s why this egregious Bill has even been introduced.

 

Part One is “Aggravated offences for preachers and leaders”.

 

So this just goes into the Criminal Code and it makes it so that there’s a bunch of laws where if a person is a religious official, or a spiritual leader, while they commit the offence, they can be imprisoned for longer. So it aggravates it makes the judge give them a more severe sentence. And the charges specifically are to do with encouraging violence and encouraging terrorism and all these kind of charges.

 

So when you look at the Bill here, it doesn’t specify what the crimes are, but those crimes are basically advocacy of violence and advocacy of terrorism. If this Bill passes, if you are an imam, or a priest [or rabbi?] or some other spiritual leader of a religion, you can be punished more because you advocate violence. So that’s part one.

 

And then I’ll move down to Part Six, bundled part six with part one, because it’s the same kind of thing, the same kind of change there. And it’s just for when these spiritual leaders, the charges are when you’re trying to get a young person, someone under 18, to commit violence as well. And more or less the same thing, though it is in a different section of the bill. They have changed the penalty to a person might commit an aggravated offence if the person is a religious official or other spiritual leader.

 

So in terms of grooming children for violence or for advocating terrorism or inciting violence against a particular group, if you are some sort of spiritual leader, religious official, you can be punished more severely. This is obviously going after Muslims. This is to punish Muslims more severely if they’re caught saying stuff about Israel and Palestinian resistance against Israel. This is pretty obviously what this is directed towards.

 

So Part Two is there’s increased penalty for using a postal or similar service to menace, harass or cause offence. And that’s been increased to five years in jail. So that’s what Joel Davis has been charged with and he’s still being remanded now. I think it’s been two months or maybe even more.

 

[06:09]

 

So Part Three is “Aggravated sentencing factor”. And this affects the Crimes Act 1914. And it basically makes it so all criminal offences can be aggravated by being racist. So if you commit a crime because you’re racist, you can be punished more severely by the judge.

 

Read out the specific part:

 

“The person’s conduct constituting the offence was motivated, whether wholly or in part, by hatred of another person, or a group of persons, and that hatred was because of the person’s belief that the target person or persons in the target group are distinguished by race or national or ethnic origin.”

 

So theoretically, if somebody raped a woman because he hated that woman’s race or nation or ethnicity, he can be punished more severely than somebody who rapes a woman for choice and noble reasons, like lust or hatred of some other kind.

 

Every single crime now, if you can be proven to be a racist, you get punished more severely. That’s basically what this aggravated sentencing factor is if the crime you commit is motivated by hate, well, racism or nationalism, then you can be punished more severely. That’s what this change means.

 

But basically every crime can be turned into a hate crime, essentially. So if you assault or rape or murder, then it can aggravate it if it’s proven that you’re a racist.

 

So Part Four is “Prohibited hate group”. And a prohibited hate group is a designation that the Home Affairs Minister can give out. So the current Home Affairs Minister right now is Tony Burke, for the Labor Party. This legislation allows the government to ban particular organisations. It can ban organisations, it can unban them as well, and they can add multiple names to a ban.

 

So if you ban an organisation, you can’t just rename it because that’s going to be banned as well. They’re just going to add it as an alias. So you can’t just get around the ban by rebranding.

 

So to be designated a prohibited hate group, that group has to have committed a “hate crime”. And they define what a hate crime is so here it is. 1 14. A. So definition of a hate crime:

 

“A hate crime is conduct that would constitute any of the following offences. Urging or threatening violence and offences against groups or members of groups to the extent that the targeted group is distinguished by race or national or ethnic origin.”

 

So either:

 

“Publicly displaying prohibited symbols or giving a Nazi salute.”

 

So a hate crime can either be threatening violence or it can be publicly displaying prohibited symbols, like the swastika or giving the Nazi salute. And then here it says:

 

“A hate crime is also conduct that was engaged in at a time before a provision referred to in subsection (1) commenced and would constitute an offence against the provision had the provision been in force at that time.”

 

What this means is that you don’t have to have committed a hate crime after this legislation passed. If you’ve given the Roman salute or you’ve displayed a swastika, as your group, then you’ve committed a hate crime and you can be listed as a hate organisation. So you can be punished retroactively. I will further explain this, but make no mistake, being listed as a hate organisation is a punishment in itself. So the process is the punishment!

 

And you got to remember, a hate crime can be just political expression, like flying the swastika or moving your arm in a gesture in a Nazi salute. That is political expression. And if you just do that, you can be banned for being an organisation that gives the Roman salute. So you can be banned for retroactive conduct.

 

This is insane, because laws aren’t supposed to be retroactive. Non-retroactivity is a fundamental legal principle. That law should only apply to actions occurring after the law was enacted, not before, preventing new laws from punishing past behaviour.

 

Everyone just takes that for granted. But when you have the jewish lobby demanding laws, they really don’t care about what we take for granted, obviously.

 

For banning an organisation, a conviction is not required. So:

 

“A person does not need to have been convicted of a hate crime in order for the AFP minister (which is the Home affairs guy, so Tony Burke) to be satisfied, an organisation has engaged in conduct of a kind mentioned in paragraph one.”

 

And then there is:

 

“No procedural fairness required. The AFP minister (so Tony Burke) is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness in deciding whether or not the AFP Minister is satisfied for the purposes of this section.”

 

So basically that means the people that are affected by the banning, so say the National Socialist Network was banned, we get no hearing, no say, no chance to respond, no recourse, no explanation about what’s happening. You’re just basically told:

 

“Tough luck! Like, enjoy being banned!”

 

So yeah, you get no hearing, you get no way to explain yourself or try to defend yourself in front of a judge or anything like that. And that’s what they’ve written right here, “no procedural fairness required”. Which is another legal principle that the jewish lobby don’t care about. They don’t care about what’s called natural justice or procedural fairness.

 

So:

 

“Director-General of Security advice to be provided before specifying an organisation as a prohibited hate group.”

 

So Mike Burgess has to give advice to Tony Burke or the Director General of Security has to give advice to the AFP minister and he has to be satisfied that:

 

“The organisation has engaged in activities, and that the activities or the like, the continued engagement in the activities would or are likely to increase the risk of politically motivated violence or of the promotion of communal violence.”

 

You have to use your intelligence here and think about what they’re saying. Obviously the logic that people like Mark Burgess are going to say is that because you’re engaging activities like giving the Roman salute that those activities are going to make it more likely that people go do terrorism.

 

[14:04]

 

So that’s what it’s saying and that’s what’s going to be argued. So if this Bill passes, Mike Burgess is gonna go tell Tony Burke:

 

“Well, yeah, giving the Roman salute makes it more likely that terrorism is going to happen in the future. They need to be banned!”

 

If Mike Burgess thinks that giving the Roman salute, giving the Hitler salute and saying “Heil Hitler” and wearing black clothes makes it more likely that someone is going to go out and blow up something or kill a bunch of people, well then your organisation gets banned.

 

So that’s what happens. So they can list an organisation. And when an organisation gets listed, then it opens up people to be charged with a number of offences that relate to that prohibited hate group.

 

Those offences are:

 

“Directing the activities of a prohibited hate group.”

 

Which can get you 15 years in jail.

 

“Membership of a prohibited hate group.”

 

And you have to keep in mind that being a member of an organisation you can be an informal member of the organisation and you can be charged with this because they define member of a prohibited hate group as:

 

“A member of an organisation includes a person who is an informal member of the organisation and a person who has taken steps to become a member of the organisation. And in the case of an organisation that is a body corporate, a director or an officer of the body corporate.”

 

So if you’re in so-called informal member of an organisation, you can be charged. So:

 

“Membership of a prohibited hate group”, 7 years.

 

“Recruiting for a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Training involving a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Getting funds to, from or for a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

“Providing support to a prohibited hate group”, 15 years.

 

And most of these offences have a lower offence if you’re convicted for one of them while being reckless rather than, I guess knowingly doing it. So being reckless means that you’re aware of a substantial risk that you’re doing the crime, and it changes like the imprisonment from like 15 years to 10 years if you’re only proven to have recklessly done it.

 

And the only defenses that you have are either you didn’t do the crime or you were a government agent when you were doing the crime. So if you’re some sort of informant or secret agent infiltrating a hate organisation then you have a defence, but otherwise you have no defence.

 

This legislation is obviously directed towards having a chilling effect on advocacy and activism of organisations outside of the mainstream. That’s obvious.

 

And you gotta remember that there is no procedural fairness. The fact that your organisation gets banned and then you have 15 years hanging over your head, that’s the punishment!

 

And obviously having your rights taken away that you can’t politically associate or politically express yourself in that particular way, that’s the punishment!

 

And I’ll go off on a little bit of a tangent here. In my case, the Roman salute case that was brought against me in the Magistrates Court for which I was convicted and then I appealed. Went to the county court and was had had the conviction against me upheld. They argued that the Roman salute offences are very narrow and hence it could be justified taking away that form of political expression. They did admit it was political expression but they said they could take it away because it was relatively narrow what it was.

 

Well you know, now it’s having very serious consequences because that offence, giving a slew has been recategorized as a “hate crime” and it can be used to retroactively ban a organisation like a 300 man organisation and threaten its leaders with 15 year sentences if they continue. A lot of the judiciary get too focused. They get narrow minded, they don’t understand like how dangerous these laws you give them an inch, they’re going to take a mile. And this legislation is taking a mile. It is insanity! Also vindictiveness! Like I don’t know how it could occur to you to have a maximum of 15 years for some of these charges when you can be prohibited as a hate group because you moved your arm in a particular way that offends the jews!

 

And another case that I saw on the news today actually funnily enough was someone who’s been charged with threatening to kill the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. And the charge for which he’s been charged, threatening to kill an MP is a maximum of five years.

 

So you get a maximum of five years for threatening to kill an MP. If you direct the activities of a prohibited hate group. A prohibited hate group that gave the Roman salute. You can be in prison for 15 years. That sounds perfectly reasonable!

 

So Part Five is “Racial vilification offence”. And this offence is:

 

“Publicly promoting or inciting hatred. A person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct in a public place.”

 

And to be clear, the Internet includes a public place.

 

Basically everywhere is a public place except for inside your own home where it can’t be seen by the public. But the Internet counts, as is sending it through the mail, some sort of business, or out on the street or something like that. All counts as a public place.

 

So the conduct is:

 

“Promote or incite hatred of another person, or a group of persons because of their race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, or disseminate ideas of superiority over or hatred of another person, or a group of persons because of the race, colour, or national or ethnic origin of the target or target group. And the conduct would, in all the circumstances, cause a reasonable person who is the target, a member, or a member of the target group to be intimidated, to fear harassment or violence, or to fear for their safety.”

 

And they call the “reasonable person test” as an objective test, but really it just comes down to the judge to decide who a reasonable person is, to describe who the reasonable person is so really, it isn’t actually a objective test. It’s just a subjective test. Like, it comes down to what the judge thinks. It’s not like there’s any empirical data about who this average person is based on polling or anything. It just comes down to the judge, who he thinks, he or she thinks this reasonable person of the group of a particular ethnic or racial group is.

 

[21:42]

 

And obviously you can be charged here with a criminal offence if you:

 

“Disseminate ideas of superiority over a group of persons because of their race, colour, national or ethnic origin.”

 

So you can’t say that particular nations are better than other nations. So if you say “Australia is better than China”, well, you could be charged. You could be charged with this. I’m not saying that that’s likely to happen, but with what this law says, I’m somebody who is disliked by the government. If I said that “Australia is a better society, Australia is a better nation than China”, well, that’s disseminating an idea of superiority over a group of persons because of their national origin. Maybe I could say that and someone feels intimidated or they feel fearful. And the issue is, there’s so many people in this society that feel intimidated or fear from the littlest things. We’ve become a very soft society. And judges love to rule based on sentimentality when it comes to these things! And you can be imprisoned up to five years for publicly promoting or inciting racial hatred. Yeah!

 

So:

 

“For the purposes of subsection 1, it is immaterial whether the target or members of the target group actually are distinguished by the particular race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, or the conduct actually results in hatred of another person or group of persons, or the conduct actually results in any person feeling intimidated, feeling harassment or violence, or feeling fearing for their safety.”

 

So what that says is that they don’t have to prove that any person of that particular race or nation or ethnicity was present and kind of a target of it. They don’t have to prove that hatred was actually kind of incited in somebody. They don’t need to prove that anyone was intimidated, felt harassed, or feared for their safety. None of that actually has to be proven because a judge can come up with this magical, reasonable person of that group, this imaginary person, and say:

 

“This person has been targeted. This imaginary person has been targeted. It could potentially have led to hatred being incited in other people and it could have potentially intimidated or made someone, this imaginary person, fear for their life.”

 

At least you have a defense here for religious teaching or discussion:

 

“Subsection (1) does not apply to conduct that consists only of directly quoting from or otherwise referencing a religious text for the purpose of religious teaching or discussion.”

 

So this is lucky for our Muslim friends who can quote directly from that Hadith saying that the stones and the trees are going to tell them where the so the Muslims are safe in that regard, and so they should be.

 

“Part 7. Hate symbols – Reversing the burden of proof for public interest elements of prohibited symbols offences.”

 

So it means that there’s already these hate symbol laws. So if you display a hate symbol or you display the swastika or give the Roman salute, there were defenses saying that you could do these things as long as there was a public interest like a religious, academic, educational, artistic, literary or scientific purpose that isn’t contrary to the public interest.

 

And previously the prosecution would have to prove themselves that this hate symbol or the salute wasn’t given for one of those legitimate purposes. So it’s been flipped now, that if you display this a symbol or give the salute or anything like that, then you can be charged. And then you have to prove that you did it for a legitimate purpose, like a religious, academic, educational, artistic, literary or scientific purpose.

 

And so basically this gets rid of the presumption of innocence, and so it makes it easier for the prosecution to charge people and drag them through the courts. Because if you post a picture of Hitler with the swastika, you can be charged. They don’t need to prove that you did it for hateful reasons. Actually you need to prove that you didn’t do it for hateful reasons.

 

So that’s what it literally does. It reverses the burden of proof. An example would be if I posted a photo of Hitler next to the swastika. I can be charged easier because the prosecution doesn’t have to prove that I posted it for a hateful purpose. I have to defend myself in court and say, perhaps I posted it for an academic purpose or to teach or something like that.

 

[27:15]

 

The other thing is the prohibited hate group symbols are added to the criminal offences. So it’s not only just terrorist symbols and the swastika and the Roman salute. So if NSN got banned, the converging arrows, for example, the converging arrows, flag or the patch, you’d be able to be charged with displaying that.

 

These laws also have a minimum one year in jail. So a judge has to give you a year in jail if you’re convicted of this.

 

I’ve went through all the hate speech stuff in this Bill with you. I think it’s clear that the people that wrote this Bill don’t care about the basic legal principles that are supposed to underpin the whole of our judicial system, like natural justice, presumption of innocence, freedom of speech, freedom of association, proportionality. Non-retroactivity.

 

So what has been the response? One Nation has come out opposing it, which is good for them. The Liberal Party have come out opposing it as well, but they’ve said that they want to come up with their own version of it, which I suggest would be far more watered down than this, which would be good.

 

But these laws don’t need to be passed. There are laws that stop people. Well, that criminalises terrorism. It’s not like the person who went and shot those people in Bondi is at liberty because there’s a fault in the laws. He’s going to spend the rest of his life in jail. Changing the laws isn’t going to fix any of this. It’s going to make it worse!

 

The real danger isn’t what we have to do to apparently solve “hate”. The problem is what are we going to do to solve the fact that we have a government that wants to destroy all the principles that are supposed to underpin our judicial system because they don’t like particular groups, opposition groups in society, whether they be National Socialist or Islamist.

 

The response from the entire online Right has been very positive. Like everyone is raging about this, like it’s all that anyone is talking about in the Australian Right-wing now. Everyone has come out against it.

 

We have the Home Affairs Shadow Minister, this guy, the dishonourable Jonathan Duniam, some total nobody no one’s ever heard of or cares about. And he was mocking the National Socialist Network for us, saying that this Bill is draconian.

 

Jonathan Duniam:

 

“Of course they cite in that statement that these laws ‘most draconian in the universe, making freedom of speech impossible, etc, etc’. Clearly they’ve seen this identification of formal groupings and hate group listing etc., as something to try and avoid, which is good in one sense.”

 

And then I think he went and checked the Internet and saw that everyone else was saying it as well and then he changed his positions.

 

What’s the response been from the Muslims? The Muslim response has been good. They’ve been coming out against it and you know, they shouldn’t be banned. There’s been like arguments that the problem with these laws is it doesn’t come out hard enough against Islam. These laws shouldn’t be passed at all! Even if they were going to be just confined to Muslims. These laws need to be opposed. We don’t need to ban any of these Muslims organisations. Now just because two Muslims went and killed 15 people, it doesn’t mean that we have to destroy the judicial system that governs 27 million people. Like the threat is not these two Muslim terrorists killing 15 people, it’s the Commonwealth that is unnecessarily going to destroy all of our freedoms. Proposing this supposed solution that’s not even going to do anything. It’s not going to do anything to stop terrorism.

 

And then we saw fat Ross who runs the White Rose Society, she’s an anti-fascist. She described it as “state oppression”. I think you’re right there for once. And then Socialist Alternative came out against it. Their front group for Palestine. So they’ve got a group they use to organise Palestinian activists. They came out against it, so good on them.

 

Jews say it doesn’t go far enough. To be expected. I don’t think I need to comment much more on that.

 

Mainstream media has largely came out against it as well. They’ve been publishing voices that come out against it. They haven’t really been publishing any voices that go for it other than the jews. And everyone, when it comes down to it, everyone hates this Bill other than the jews. And luckily I don’t think it’s gonna pass.

 

And the Greens have come out against it. But they said they might be open to just amending it. But I’m not sure how likely that actually is. But wouldn’t it be just a perfect summation of how stupid and disgusting this country is, if after a Muslim terrorist attack in Bondi they draughted these laws which go to severely persecute and oppress National Socialists and Islamists, if the Greens amended it so that it didn’t go after Islamists and then it only affected National Socialists! So White Australians and National Socialists would be the only ones who get punished for an Islamist terrorist attack. Stranger things have happened. That sounds like something the Commonwealth would do. And that just tells you how reprehensible it is.

 

But in the first place, the fact that we are under threat, the National Socialist Network is under threat from laws that are draughted up from a Muslim terrorist attack says all that it needs to. Why are we getting banned from for an attack that has nothing to do with us? I could at least understand the rationale, even though I’d disagree with it, if some sort of Right-wing or nationalist person went out and shot people, or shot an MP or something like that, I could understand the rationale. But for us to be banned for Muslim terrorism?

 

Yeah, with the Greens and the Coalition coming out against its looking more and more like it’s not going to pass, which is a good thing.

 

Nonetheless, the National Socials Network is disbanding. Some people are disappointed by that. I saw someone on Twitter, or X as it’s now called, said that:

 

“We should be martyrs and that we should continue operations until we get charged with these 15 year offences.”

 

He said:

 

“Just be the martyrs, bro!”

 

Well, perhaps you should do that in my stead. Maybe put on a converging arrows patch, make your own one, dress up in black and go out there, get arrested on our behalf. Just be a martyr, bro!

 

And there’s not going to be any way to get around this. Like they’re not going to be charitable, they’re not going to help you out. If you even slightly do something that could be perceived as continuing the organisation after it gets banned, you’re going to be arrested, charged, remanded and facing serious jail time.

 

[35:20]

 

There’s no oversight in terms of whether or not the listing is correct. Like you get listed, it’s a done deal! You go before a judge, if you are genuinely continuing or doing any of those offences, there’s nothing he can do. He has to find you guilty or you go before a jury. And if they find you guilty, then you’re getting punished severely. You’re getting probably half a decade in jail at the very least.

 

And there’s been people on the far-Right who love to engage in victim blaming. So they say:

 

“The only reason this is happening is because the National Socialist Network engages in street activism, dresses up in black, praises Adolf Hitler, gave the Roman salutes in the past.”

 

All of that kind of hard hitting, confronting street activism. But we’re not the ones that pass these laws. Like agency obviously belongs to the legislature and the people who control the people who run the legislature, so obviously the jewish lobby.

 

So if anyone is to blame for these laws, it’s not the groups that are being banned. And it’s being done in response to these two Muslim shooters in Bondi. But it’s not even their fault. It’s not the fault of Muslim preachers, it’s not the fault of National Socialist activists. And this is the thing. It’s taking the blame away from the actual agent that has perpetrated this, who has created this, and it’s pushing it on the people who are getting targeted and who are going to suffer the most from these laws.

 

The real blame is the jewish lobby and the Australian government. That is why these laws are coming through. The people that push for them, the people who wrote them up and the people that passed them. But the issue is even if we had better optics, these laws would still be being brought through and we would still be under threat of getting banned. And this has been proven by other countries where you have groups like Generation Identity in France that got banned by the French state. I don’t think anyone’s gonna argue that their optics were an issue. Their optics were pretty tame, yet they got banned.

 

So whatever represents the strongest force of nationalism in a particular country, the jewish lobby and the government is going to try to legislate them out of existence. That’s what’s going to happen. And if we were the Nationalist Network and we didn’t wear black clothes and we just wore regular clothes, I guess regular bourgeois clothes, maybe suits and ties and had said “Australia for the Australians”, if we were the biggest group, we would still be getting banned. That’s the truth!

 

In this regard, all roads lead to Rome, as I’m sure some of you have seen in the memes recently with the rabbit with its clock. You know, it doesn’t matter which road you go down, you’re eventually going to go to Rome and it doesn’t matter what road you go down when you have an unjust system, you’re eventually going to be banned by it if you’re a big enough threat to its agenda. So you need to stop bargaining with the system when it’s fundamentally unjust.

 

And the optics people, the only thing that would be different in this situation is these optics people, because of their particular ideas of activism, they would just be a bit more sympathetic.

 

But people should stand for principles and ideas and for an actual fair legal system more than just perception and optics, in my opinion.

 

We really don’t need to total our legal system. What angers the government and the jewish lobby is that we have deeply felt political conviction and that we want to do whatever we can to further our political agenda while staying on the right side of the law. So we’re trying to stay within the legal framework while pushing forward our political agenda, what we deeply, deeply believe in. And that is what angers them the most. And it angers them so much that they don’t care about their own rules, they don’t care about their own judicial system, they don’t care about any of this.

 

Of course, the jewish lobby never really cared. It shows you that the people that profess to be liberal Democrats in this government and one of their claims for legitimacy, how little they care about it. They don’t care about their own rules, they don’t care about their own system anymore.

 

And it’s pretty obvious that these people have no respect for the system of government that our ancestors erected at the beginning of the last century. I might have a so-called “violent extremist” opinion here, but I don’t think we should total our legal system. The legal system and the principles underpinning the judicial system of yesteryear, it’s actually one of the things I do like about this country. And they accused me of hating Australia. You know, I don’t hate Australia. I don’t hate the nation, I don’t hate the continent.

 

I do certainly hate the Commonwealth, because a government that cooks up legislation like this is reprehensible!

 

[41:19]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Gab Comments

top

(Comments as of = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Blair Cottrell: If this is really ordinary quality, let me know and I’ll figure something out. I’m just streaming through OBS because the streaming services are really fucking annoying trying to work them out! Am I just a Boomer or are they really fucking annoying? They say you can sign up for free and stream for like 20 hours free or something, but then you sign up and I can’t fucking work out how to actually stream. If it’s good enough quality, I’ll just stick with this. If it’s good enough for you guys. Can you hear me okay? Give me some feedback on the audio.

 

I don’t usually stream by myself. Haven’t streamed by myself in probably three years. It makes me realise actually how much I was hinging off Joel’s initiative because I would just respond to Joel’s invitations. I wouldn’t set anything up. I don’t know how streaming works.

 

Okay, great! If the video and audio seems okay for you guys. God, every time before a stream starts, I can think of a hundred reasons not to do it. And I’m like, even when I was streaming with Joel.

 

But as I was saying, I was really hinging off Joel’s initiative because Joel had the Streamyard account. He understood how to set it up. He would just send me a link and I would just show up. That’s why I was always fine with Joel taking all the money that was raised through the streams. I didn’t care because he was the one who came up with all the talking points and did most of the talking as well.

 

But I’m basically just responding to requests that I should stream because he’s in jail now and people are used to seeing me on with Joel and they’re not getting their weekly fix of the Joel and Blair Show, right? Where else could I share the link for this? Is Gab still a thing? Does anyone use Gab? All the alternative platforms? [chuckling] I’m still completely banned from X. I was never emailed explaining why I was banned. If you ask Grok, X’s AI system why I was banned, it’ll come up with, oh, no, that’s not right. Hang on. It’ll give you some arbitrary reason about neo-Nazism, but they won’t give you an actual reason because there’s no reason accept ideology.

 

And I suppose that’s what I’ll begin talking about, ideology. Because that’s why Joel Davis is in jail! And that’s why pretty much everyone influential in nationalism is going to jail. Everyone’s going to jail1 Everyone you can think of in Australian nationalism will go to jail, myself included. They’re going to lock us up! And it was always going to happen. That’s not being black-pilled. That’s just observing things as they unfold. It’s just the objective reality.

 

Joel’s not in jail because of anything he said necessarily. No one was hurt. There’s been no serious crime committed. He’s been held in prison for ideological reasons. It’s pretty obvious, right?

 

I was thinking about playing the game that I usually play when I stream with Joel, so you guys could see what game I play. But I thought it might be too distracting. Usually it’s really helpful. It assists my thinking process to do something with my hands while I’m listening. Much to the dismay of school teachers. I was always told by school teachers that because I was scribbling on a book, I must not be listening. But actually it helped me to listen more. Can anyone relate to that? I found if I was looking at a schoolteacher as a kid, if I was watching the teacher while they said something, I was too busy picking up, like, intuitive signals, like facial expression, body language. I was reading how much they believed in what they were actually saying, whether or not they were feeling bored. All of that was coming through to me.

 

So in order to actually listen to the words they were speaking, not looking at them was important. Because if I was looking at the teacher, all I was getting was like, body language and facial expression signals, like intuitive signals. It was hard to listen to what the teacher was actually saying. Usually because teachers don’t believe what they’re saying. They’re just regurgitating bullshit from textbooks, right?

 

So here I was just scribbling in my book, trying to listen, and I’d be reprimanded for it. Obviously, I’m not listening if I’m scribbling in my book!

 

But it’s the same sort of situation when streaming with Joel or anybody else. I need to be doing something else in order to listen effectively.

 

Down? What am I down about? I’m not down. How do I seem down to you? Do I seem down in the dumps? Because I don’t really experience depression or any down sensation. To be honest, every day I wake up and I’m not surrounded by cops, every day I wake up and I don’t get dragged off to prison for hate speech or just some ideological reason, every day I’m not set up on charges and put in jail, it’s a great day! I get to be free for one nore day. That’s how I live my life. So I’m happy to be here, guys! [chuckling] I’m happy to still not be in jail despite believing the wrong things.

 

Yeah, I feel like I’m always pretty happy. I tend to be either happy or really angry! I kind of switch between those two states of emotion. It’s important that I’m kind. I have to make a strong effort to be kind because the alternative is not a great thing! Hasn’t produced great results for me. [chuckling]

 

Yeah, it does suck that Joel’s in jail. Did you guys see the article? I’ll actually post it here, if I can find it first. Hang on. Where? I sent it to a friend. Here it is here. Mainstream media creating paywalls, like expecting people to pay to read the shit that they write. Imagine paying for the Herald Sun or the Daily Mail! Check out that link there. If you guys haven’t read that already. We’ll go through this together actually.

 

[08:24]

 

Actually, if you guys are on your computer, phone, whatever, click this link. It should take you to a Daily Mail article. We have to use this link to get around the paywall because we’re not paying the Daily Mail to read this shit!:

 

“Crushing legal blow for the Bondi Nazi as we track down his girlfriend after she welcomed their first baby or first child while he was behind bars!”

 

The essence of this article is basically, should I bring it up on screen share? Does that make it better for everybody? It probably does, right? Let’s see if I can figure that out. What I’ve got to do is Joel usually does this stuff. What I’ve got to do is, I think, display capture.

 

Actually, I’m not going to bring it up on the screen because it has pictures of Joel’s girlfriend or the mother of Joel’s child. To be honest, I know so little about this relationship that I don’t know whether to suggest this is Joel’s girlfriend. So I’m just going to say this is the mother of his first child. And the pictures taken of her were taken without her knowledge or consent. How’s this? Right? How do we live in a country where a bunch of people with cameras can find out where you live, go out the front, go and wait out the front of your house indefinitely and just sit there taking photos of you and your house. You come out to put the trash out, they’re taking photos of you. They’re sitting there stalking you, waiting for you! Then they publish those photos publicly with personal information about where you live, personal circumstances about your family, your children. They publish all that publicly, and there’s no consequence. That’s really confusing to me.

 

There should be brutal consequences for doing that to someone’s family. Brutal consequences, man! I think it would do the mother of Joel’s child at disservice to share that article. But you guys can read it for yourself if you want. I just think it’s very disrespectful to hide behind bushes and take photos of someone’s partner. She’s just had a baby and you’re stalking her. That’s fucking weird, man! Who are these fucking journalists, actually, who wrote this article? I noticed some journalists don’t even put their names to their articles anymore.

 

Lucy Manley. Who’s Lucy Manley? I suppose I better be careful about what I say because I could be eroding. What am I doing? What are we all doing? We’ve been labelled “Nazis”, right? Everybody who’s ethnically White and believes that is significant and not negative. We’re all Nazis! And what are we doing?:

 

“We’re eroding the social fabric!”

 

Is that what that federal copper said? I’ve got to be careful because something I say may contribute to the erosion of the social fabric! Lucy Manley, senior news reporter.

 

To be honest, she probably didn’t take the pictures. It probably wasn’t Lucy Manley sitting at the front of this girl’s house, but she still publicly posted all this information. I suppose this is just like how paparazzi works, right? You can understand why people in Hollywood just hate journalists so much because they don’t have any respect. They’re like vultures.

 

But I think it’s always been that way, hasn’t it? It’s not really a new thing. I just didn’t expect this to happen so suddenly. Like, if you guys think about it for a moment, right? Joel is notorious for pushing boundaries with the language he chooses to use. Racial slurs are just part of Joel’s regular vocabulary, regular dialogue. I don’t think what he wrote on Telegram about that “rhetorical rape” comment, I don’t think that’s the worst thing he said in the past few years. I think he said worse stuff than that on streams. I actually think if he made that comment, the one he’s supposedly in jail for, if he made that comment, like, four or five months ago, I don’t think anyone would have bat an eyelid. I don’t think anyone would have cared. It would have just been standard Joel Davis. Because it is standard Joel Davis to say stuff like that isn’t it?

 

Everything’s just taken a dramatic shift since the government seems to have become very sensitive and frightened about this White Australia political party. The Home Affairs Minister after deporting that civil engineer guy, Matthew. What was his name? Matthew Gutter or Guther? [Matthew Gruter] He arrived back in South Africa recently. But Tony Burke said:

 

“If they’re going to put their numbers to the test (he’s referring to the White Australia party or community), then they will fail spectacularly!”

 

If that is true, then why not just let them put their numbers to the test and watch them fail? Why is it necessary for all the political policing and to put them in prison and to make laws that they can’t even express their ideology freely? If you’re so sure they’re going to fail when they put their numbers to the test democratically, why all the political policing? Why the aggression? I suppose political bureaucrats aren’t so sure that they’re going to fail spectacularly! They want to manipulate the system to make sure they fail, I guess.

 

I should solo stream more often. The problem is I don’t really like it, bro. I don’t think I like it anyway. Usually I get about half an hour in and I’m done. Maybe I’m fully like ADHD brain or something. It’s not that I don’t like streaming, it’s just before I’m about to start doing it, I can just think of more efficient things I can do.

 

Like right now I’m working on a video course which is going to be the primary product that I’ll be offering for my online coaching service.

 

[16:12]

 

But I want to make sure it’s an extremely good, polished product. What it basically is I’m thinking about every problem someone will have with getting their diet and their training right and I’m trying to solve those problems for the viewers, for people who actually download this product. I want to solve all your problems for you. I want it to be very good! And I’ve been working on that in my spare time. That’s just one of the things I can think of that I would rather do instead of stream. But I feel a bit of a duty, I suppose, to produce some stream content since you guys would usually watch Joel and enjoy what he’s saying.

 

Thanks for the donations, by the way. I don’t know how to access money through Rumble. I’ve never done it before. I don’t expect that it’s a good idea for me to try to extract any money from Rumble. My Australian bank account will probably just get deleted if I do that. I can tell you from experience, any money that comes from any overseas source, when you’re an Australian and you’re into ethnic nationalism like I am, your bank account just gets frozen and deleted, straight away, pretty much within a week of receiving the funds or before the funds actually clear. God, how many bank accounts have I lost? I don’t even know, I don’t remember.

 

But I think I was the first guy in Australia to have his bank accounts deleted because of his ideology. And now it’s just like a standard thing. Now it just happens every day to someone for some stupid reason. Maybe I should have tried to sue the bank or something to create a precedent. The problem is I’m not a court guy. I don’t want to go to court. I don’t want to take people to court and stand there and complain to a judge, you know, I’d rather just headbutt someone! Do you understand what I mean? I would rather just headbutt someone and crush their skull if I have a problem with them. I do not want to stand in court and say:

 

“Your honour, this person, blah blah, blah, I’m right, they’re wrong, please believe me. Have my money, have more of my money. $10,000, $20,000. Please rule in my favour, your honour!”

 

That’s really fucking gay in my mind! I can’t bring myself to do it. But that’s how the system works. If you don’t have money and if you don’t grovel to judges with a lot of money, well, you really don’t get anywhere, do you?

 

We have a problem in society though, don’t we? In post violence society. Everything still happens the same way it would when violence was a main feature of society. It just happens non-violently. So you still get humiliated, you still get targeted, people still get assassinated. It just happens socially and politically rather than physically. The problem with that though is everyone is just treating each other like shit because there’s no immediate physical consequence anymore. No one’s worried about getting their teeth knocked out. Nobody’s worried about getting their jaw broken and having to drink their food through a straw for three months. If people were worried about that, as they should be, everyone would be more kind. Everyone would be nice to each other. We would just have a more, how should I suggest? It would just be a more enjoyable place to live. It’d be a more tolerable place to live because everyone would be naturally kind for fear of having their jaws broken.

 

Everyone just does whatever they want because:

 

“Oh, you can’t touch me. That’s against the law. That’s a salt and pepper!”

 

That’s [chuckling] another aspect of modern society which is really gay.

 

Yeah. Interesting question, Oznat News:

 

“Do I have any comment on the Brisbane crew splitting from March for Australia? One of the organisers name dropping me.”

 

I have no idea what’s going on with that! No idea! Whenever there’s like drama and people are arguing and splitting and you know what I mean, I just back the fuck out! I can’t deal with that petty gay drama and people saying words because they don’t like each other online. It’s not my style at all, bro. I don’t know anything about that. I can’t comment. I don’t know why everyone can’t just have a rally against immigration. Like, shut up about this evil caricature of Nazis that everyone’s obsessed with. Just get over it. Have a rally to stop immigration. The subject shouldn’t be Nazis. Anyone who’s trying to divert the attention of the people interested in the rally to Nazis instead of the purpose of the rally, which is stopping immigration. They are an enemy of your country. They are a fucking enemy of your country! Everyone should just have a rally against immigration. Stop immigration! Anyone saying Nazis, they’re an enemy, ignore them.

 

The Nazis appear to be public enemy number one for the government in Australia right now! But what is that? What is a Nazi? What do you guys think? I mean, for the standard person, when you say the word “Nazi”, a certain image of something undesirable appears in your mind. That word “Nazi” is associated with genocide, is it not? Like the killing of large amounts of people through gassing and systemic execution of various kinds. But is that what history really tells us? And see, this is the issue.

 

I’ll tell you guys a story, right? I was at the gym yesterday doing some leg press and a guy approached me. And this happens all the time now. [chuckling] He’s about 6 foot 7, this guy. He’s really tall, but he’s only young. He tells me:

 

“Hey man, you look familiar.”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I get that a bit.”

 

And I outstretched my hand to shake his hand because he was just kind of staring at me. And he gave me a Roman handshake. And I’m thinking:

 

“Okay, this is one of the boys.”

 

And I noticed he’s wearing a T-shirt with a stencil of Hitler on it. This guy tells me he’s 18. For the last few years, he’s just been researching online and he’s on this trajectory. He discovers National Socialism and he explains it as just the truth! That’s what he says to me. He says:

 

“Mate, it’s just the truth! I don’t even see it as a philosophy necessarily. It’s just the truth of this world and how things are.”

 

And that’s when I realised, because this keeps happening, like young people keep approaching me and talking to me about stuff like this. Either they recognise me or they don’t. It’s literally just a subject matter in the public right now! It made me realise why the Australian government is trying to ban social media for people under 16 years old. The government will say it’s “for your safety”. [chuckling] Can you believe they’re still trying to sell that?

 

[22:27]

 

The fact that the government does anything for your safety. Like, imagine actually believing that! I suppose it’s comfortable to believe that if you’re a standard person:

 

“Government trying to protect me, keeping me safe. Thanks government!”

 

God, imagine actually believing that! Imagine buying into that, man. It freaks me out to think that people actually buy into that.

 

But anyway, the social media ban is, again, it’s about ideology, isn’t it? Because Hitler seems to have become this core feature of youth culture. A large section of the youth either think that Hitler wasn’t that bad or that he’s been lied about a great deal and he’s an interesting character. Like a massive amount of Generation Z, the Zoomers, they believe, they’re straight up. That’s what they believe to the extent where they’re in the gym, in a public gym, wearing Hitler T-shirts, and just talking to people about Hitler. I mean, you might think that this guy that approached me is unusual, but it doesn’t seem that way. It really doesn’t seem that way. It seems like these kids are everywhere.

 

And I think that’s what the social media ban in Australia is about. It’s about preventing new generation from accessing the nuance which leads to an appreciation for National Socialism and Hitler. Fundamentally that seems to be what it’s about.

 

Because the problem is, because I’ve read the Hitler’s book many times. To be honest, the first time I read it, I was really disappointed. When I saw it, I’m like, wow! I was only 18 when I first found it in a random bookshop in Fitzroy, which is a northern suburb of Melbourne. I was working there on an apartment building. I bought the book and was excited because I thought I was going to read, I was going to learn about the inner workings of this evil genius who mass murdered all of these jews and tried to take over the world. But then I’m reading the book and I’m like:

 

“Huh? There’s nothing in here about that!”

 

Okay. There’s a chapter on his early life, his service in the First World War, how propaganda works. Wow, that’s interesting. About race and how nation and race mean the same thing. How he wants to protect the Germans. Okay. There’s a bit in here about how the jews represent a threat to Germany.

 

And then there’s just a whole bunch of stuff on foreign policy. And I’m like:

 

“Where’s the genocide? Where’s the evil genius take over the world part? It’s not in here!”

 

But someone who’s still linked in with the Matrix might say:

 

“Well, of course he’s not going to admit that in his book, Blair. Otherwise, no one would have voted for him!”

 

Maybe you’re right. I don’t think that’s how it is.

 

But anyway, the reason I brought that up, because it is because in Hitler’s book, he writes. And first I’ll quote it word for word, then I’ll explain what he means. But he writes:

 

“As soon as an atom, or a glimpse of right is admitted on the opposing side, the process of doubting one’s preconceived ideas begins.”

 

I’ll repeat that so it sinks in. Right:

 

“As soon as an atom, or a glimpse of right is admitted on the evil side, or the side, the opposing side, the designated enemy side, then the process of doubting or beginning to doubt your own existing belief system begins.”

 

What does that mean? It means it is very important that an administrative government does not allow you to access any information which helps you understand the point of view of your enemy. You’re not supposed to understand your enemy’s point of view at all! You’re supposed to reject it as incontrovertibly evil! The moment any nuance is available to you that allows you to understand things from an enemy or opposition perspective, and the moment you’re actually able to understand even one thing that the enemy believes, the moment you’re able to sympathize with even one thing that the previously or an enemy stood for, a previously understood enemy stood for.

 

[26:59]

 

The moment you acknowledge that one thing an enemy did or represented was actually not that bad, then your whole worldview starts to tip. You eventually start to sympathize with an enemy, and you start to see what your previous beliefs were. You start to see them as potentially evil. That’s why when politicians talk about Nazism, they will not include even the slightest bit of nuance, ever! It will always be absolutely incontrovertibly evil! They will always associate Nazism with genocide, regardless of the facts. They will always reject Nazism as not even a real philosophy, but just a caricature of evil itself. Nazism and Hitler are evil incarnate, and you’re not supposed to look at it any other way. If you do, that’s a problem. And social media and the Internet, the age of the Internet has made it not only possible, but easy to see things from Hitler’s perspective. And the results you can see for yourself. It’s a whole fraction of the new generation which actually thinks that Hitler was the good guy, or maybe not even that bad. That’s like, some of them think he’s not that bad. The rest of them think:

 

“Oh, he’s actually the good guy!”

 

Right? That’s what happens when you allow free information, when you allow nuance. And naturally, if people start thinking that Hitler wasn’t that bad, then they end up thinking Hitler’s enemies might actually be bad. The people who oppose Hitler might actually be the bad ones. And that’s the mess that the social media system has created for the existing government. It’s allowed this nuance, which has transformed the perspective of the new generation. People are just kind of running wild with this whole new idea of recent history.

 

To summarize what I’ve said, just to wrap that up, there is a reason you will never hear a single government bureaucrat acknowledge that anything Hitler ever did, that anything the German National Socialist ever did was good. They will never acknowledge National Socialism even as a legitimate political ideology. They will always hold it up as evil incarnate. And they have to do that, because if they’ll contribute to a process where people begin to sympathize with National Socialism. Because that’s the way human psychology works. Everything is either good or evil. It’s either black or White. And the minute you allow nuance to enter that equation, everything begins to tip in the other direction. Black becomes White and good becomes evil. It’s really interesting process. And long story short, that’s what the social media ban is about, because all of the nuance, like, I’ll open up Instagram on my phone right now, for example, and I’ll see, let’s say three videos.

 

The first one will be about. It’ll be some girl who’s like 23 years old talking about how the Holocaust is just what they said happened with the Holocaust is logistically impossible. Then the next video will be about how the government murdered X amount of people with vaccines, how it caused heart conditions, nervous system disorders and premature deaths in infants.

 

And then the next video will just literally be a clip glorifying Hitler. That’s on Instagram right now! Like that’s what young people are being exposed to. 10 years old, 11 years old. Well, prior to the social media ban anyway. And that’s created a serious problem for administrative government, because all of that is going to undermine the dominating ideology of society right now, which is multiculturalism. It’s like the opposite ideology of National Socialism.

 

National Socialism represents the opposite to the current system ideology. It’s the opposite of multiculturalism. It’s the opposite of racial equality. Right. And that’s why people are in jail. That’s why Joel Davis is in jail. That’s why we’re all basically going to jail sooner or later. If you’re an influential person in ethnic nationalism, myself included, at some stage in the next year or two, the police are going to kick your door down at 4 in the morning. They’re going to take your computer, they’re going to set you up with some bullshit and put you in jail for political reasons, ideological reasons, because you represent a threat to the dominating ideology within government, media and police right now!

 

But, it can’t be any other way. I mean, just look at it the way it is. Put yourself in the position of the enemy and understand that they’re ruthless savages! They don’t give a fuck about your rights. You don’t have any rights. I’ve got no rights. I’ve got the right to die quietly and get replaced by Indians. That’s the way the government looks at it. That’s my foremost right as a White Australian. It’s to fucking shut up and die and get quietly replaced by an Indian family. One that won’t give this government as much trouble as we do. [chuckling] And that’s your right too. If you share my ethnicity and my viewpoints. That’s about as many rights as this government affords you right. Now if you think I’m wrong, just give it some time, man!

 

What can you do about it? Not a lot for the time being, I suppose. Like I said, every day I wake up where a gang of coppers haven’t kicked my door down and aren’t accusing me of some shit to put me in jail. That’s another good day. It was always going to come to this, though. It was always going to come to this:

 

“Have I thought about entering politics?”

 

In what capacity? Like, because I feel like I’ve been in politics for the last 11 years. Do you mean like official political process, like getting voted for and whatnot?

 

Of course I’ve thought about it, but it’s not really possible. You’ll find that Australian system is so corrupt, they’ll put you in jail before you can get to Parliament. But that’s part of a process that I think we need to pass through, that Australians need to pass through in order to work out or adapt to that environment, to work out a way where we can stay out of prison and actually arrive in Parliament somehow. I don’t know. I don’t like the idea of a Parliament. I’ll tell you right now!

 

[33:38]

 

I mean, look at Parliament. What is Parliament? It’s a group of hysterical women screeching about racism or other interpersonal nonsense which doesn’t actually matter. And if it’s not that, then it’s a group of men taking money from foreign lobbyists, climbing over each other to try to prove who can fill Australia with more immigrants faster. That’s what Parliament is! It’s just a snake den! It’s a rat’s nest! And anyone who goes into Parliament with good intentions will find that they have to become a snake, or a rat, in order to survive in that environment. I think we need to do away with Parliament as a country. It might be fun for someone like Joel to sit in Parliament because Joel really enjoys debating, doesn’t he? I mean, Joel thrives when he’s in an environment where he gets to argue his point with people who don’t like him. That’s why I think Joel would be excellent in Parliament.

 

But personally, I think I would get too frustrated by Parliament. I think I’m good at doing what I do now, which is just influencing from my small corner, what do you call people like me? Micro influencers? And I provide people with advice. I’m an advisor. I’m an advisor in the shadows. [chuckling] But I’m not really in the shadows, am I? I’m pretty public right now!

 

To be honest, since everything that’s happened in Australia over the past couple of months, like Joel going to jail, stacks of criminal charges being laid against activists left, right and centre, you know, nationalist activists, the Federal Police seemingly being converted into a political police, an ideological policing unit to prevent nationalism from taking hold. I’m not even sure what I should say! Like, I go to post something on Telegram and I’m thinking:

 

“Fuck, what can I even write that won’t just land me in prison right now?”

 

I don’t even know. I’m not really sure. The culture’s changed so quickly that I’m not really sure if I should write anything at all!

 

But then I think to myself:

 

“I’m probably going to go to jail anyway. So fuck it! I’ll just keep writing what I think. I’ll just keep doing what I’ve always done.”

 

All right, how far in are we? How long have I survived so far? I don’t think I can see. Oh, no, I can. No, I can’t see how long I’ve been streaming because I’m just streaming through OBS. I’m not using any of the streaming services. I couldn’t work them out man. I’m just going to close this blind. It’s like some brutal sun glare coming through there. Is that better or worse? Maybe I’ll open it again. Wow! Survived longer than half an hour. That’s nice.

 

Well, thanks for the appreciation, guys. Thanks for joining me. What else was there? There was another article or two that I wanted to discuss with you guys because there’s just been so much going on in Australia for the past couple of weeks, and I spend most of my time working and trying to, what do you call it? Trying to build this online coaching business. So my head hasn’t been as into the news as it should be. It’s like I have one day off. I get like a Sunday afternoon off every week, and that’s the time where I try to catch up on the news and what’s been happening.

 

I saw that Tom Sewell was streaming with, is it called the Fight Back podcast with Blizzerian and Jake Shields? That should be interesting. Isn’t it crazy The Times we’re living in where you can open a social media app and you got Dan Blizzerian talking about how Israel is the most evil thing in the world. And that guy is like, that guy’s watched by a lot of people. He’s someone who’s quite wealthy, according to my understanding.

 

Yeah, I know people want to speak to me about March for Australia, Queensland. Like I said, I’ve got no idea what’s going on with that. I know that there’s drama and there’s people on X who are like, and I don’t even know what’s happening.

 

As I said, I don’t know why everyone can’t just have a rally about a single issue. Single issue rallies are really easy! Anyone trying to complicate it to make it about something other than that single issue, in this case, stopping immigration. They’re an enemy. They’re an enemy! It’s that simple. Just keep them out, get away from them, don’t let them in, don’t let them anywhere near the organisation of the rally itself. Just stick to that one issue. It’s that simple! The moment someone says:

 

“Oh, but there’s Nazis over there!”

 

Shut the fuck up! Shut the fuck up! It’s about stopping immigration. It’s not about Nazis. Simple! Why can’t people figure that out? It’s like it requires the same kind of mental strength that is necessary to ignore arguing with people, or to not argue with people. Which is like when someone’s trying to compel you to argue with them, you literally just ignore them and go about whatever it is you’re doing. You learn to do that in politics. You have to be able to do that in politics. If you can’t ignore what people are saying, you’ll always be dragged into dirty little corners of tit for tat that are just going to waste your time. You have to be able to actually not care what people are saying. You have to actually be amused at people trying to derail you or detract you from your single purpose.

 

Politics is really simple and easy. You just have to stay on that one narrow, single purpose goal route. Very easy! It’s actually the stupidest business in the world, politics. I think Napoleon said that, because you’re literally in the business of influencing simpletons who really want and desire that one train of thought system, that one message that us against them dynamic. And the moment you make it more complicated than that with arguing about ideology and stuff, then you’re basically cooked. No longer are you appealing to the ordinary folk. You just need to keep things simple. It’s really easy.

 

[40:59]

 

 

I noticed I’m being called a “White supremacist” now in the press whenever I’m mentioned. I don’t know why I’m still being mentioned. I haven’t hosted or attended a protest in the capacity of actually participating in it in quite a while. All I do is appear on stream occasionally as a result of being invited onto it, but I still get mentioned in media articles on occasion. And I’m now White supremacist! I used to be far-Right activist, then I was far-Right extremist. Then I was accused neo-Nazi. Then they just took the word accused out and started saying neo-Nazi.

 

And now it’s neo-Nazi, but also White supremacist. It’s interesting, isn’t it? Because I’ve never actually described myself as White supremacist. It’s all very dirty language, curse language, designed to make you look, you know, evil, undesirable. Don’t listen to this person. What a horrible man. [chuckling] It’s probably illegal. I actually know that it is illegal. A former colleague of mine, Dennis Hutz, who was quite close to us during our early years of activism with United Patriots Front. I don’t know if it was Channel Seven or Channel Nine. It was one of the major media corporations, but they just called him a White supremacist after he did some sort of political activity. It was a stunt or something. He issued a legal notice or something like that opened up a lawsuit. And they settled with him before the court date. And they paid him out I don’t know, somewhere between 50 and $70,000. So he got a payout because they called him White supremacist without any basis.

 

I wonder what the basis for calling me a White supremacist is? It’s guilt by association, isn’t it? It’s because I’ve streamed or sat on a panel with people who might accept that identity. I don’t know. But what does White supremacist entail as well? It’s like if someone calls you White supremacist, right, what that means to the ordinary mind is they think that you’re the kind of person who walks around and just thinks you’re superior to everyone because you’re White. Like, it would mean that I would just walk past a Chinaman or something like that and just hate this person because he’s Chinese and not White. It’s like, imagine going through life like that. Imagine how exhausting that would be to have to hate everyone around you just because they’re not White all the time.

 

I mean, I’ve never really felt that way. To be honest, I don’t really feel anything towards people who aren’t White. I don’t really have any room to feel anything for them. It’s not like they’re not significant to me in any way. I don’t really live in a place where there’s a lot of people who aren’t White. So being a White supremacist is not really something that’s ever occurred to me. I’ve never really thought of myself that way.

 

But apparently Australian journalists, mainstream media journalists, they know more about me than I do! [chuckling] they get to decide my ideology and how to describe me, regardless of the facts. And that’s the country we live in, ladies and gentlemen. It’s also a country where you go to jail if you write the wrong thing on Telegram.

 

And if you go to a protest, a police approved protest, you don’t commit any crimes. You’re even a highly regarded civil engineer. And you’ve been in Australia for years without committing any crimes. But you went to one protest for ideological reasons the government doesn’t like, you’re getting deported! You’re out of here within a day or two. Well, I don’t think he was actually out of here within a day or two, but I know that he ended up in immigration detention within a day or two. God, that’s crazy, man! I don’t think that’s ever happened in the history of Australia. I actually tried to find another situation where someone was deported, like taken to immigration and deported that quickly. Not even serious rapists and murderers. No one in the history of this country has been apprehended and deported along with his family that fast! That’s never happened before.

 

Think about what that means. It means that a whole new precedent of political policing is now occurring in Australia. And it means everyone who was influential in nationalism is bound to go to jail at some point or another. That is the logical mathematical conclusion! So brace yourselves!

 

Like I said I was gonna play a game. I was gonna play a game for you guys that I usually play with Joel. You know what’s funny? Someone said in the comments on one of the last streams that I did with Joel before he was in jail, someone said:

 

“Oh, Blair’s losing hope! Blair’s so black pilled he’s even started playing a game while streaming with Joel. He’s not serious anymore!”

 

I thought to myself, bro, I’ve been playing a game while streaming with Joel for like three years. I just didn’t say anything because I thought maybe it’s rude.

 

[46:13]

 

But now I’m just being honest because it kind of explains why sometimes I’m a bit distracted. But that’s how I listen. As I explained at the start of the stream, I listen by doing something else with my hands. And so like some people do that. Some people need to be able to like do something else in order to intake information effectively. Like if I’m just sitting there staring at the screen, I get bored. It’s hard for me to actually listen. It’s easy to listen if I’m doing something else.

 

It is World of Warcraft hardcore, but it’s a private server called Turtle Wow! You guys know what that is? It’s like, how would you describe it? It’s like classic. Plus, it’s the original World of Warcraft, but it’s had all this additional content bolted on. It’s even got new raids and new dungeons, but it’s all at level 60. Because you can only play Classic World of Warcraft or Vanilla so many times before you know every single weapon that drops, every single item that drops. The good thing about Turtle Wow is its got like an array of new items and weapons and quests that you’ve never seen before added into places like Westfall and Elwyn Forest, and all the early human starting zones and beyond. There’s whole new zones as well. And it’s all based on what Blizzard was going to release with the original Vanilla, but they didn’t end up releasing it because they didn’t have enough manpower or time to actually implement those things into the game. But the original World of Warcraft, the original vanilla, that came out in like 2004, I think, or 2000, 2003, when I was like 13 or 14, it was basically an unfinished game.

 

If you look at the way the classes were set up, it wasn’t finished. Mage was finished, Rogue was finished, Warrior was kind of finished. The other classes weren’t finished and the game wasn’t finished, but they released it anyway and it still became an international phenomenon.

 

But it’s an easy game to play while you’re streaming because you don’t need to pay that much attention to it. It’s not a game like Doom Eternal, for example, where God, I’m like, that game requires 100% of your attention.

 

Nick Patterson. I don’t want to talk about individuals. I don’t want to talk about individuals. It’s not my style. What could I say, though in summary? I think Nick’s doubling down on his support for Israel because he probably got bullied for supporting Israel. And some people, when you bully them, they actually double down on what you’re bullying them for. That’s the way they respond. He’s probably copped a lot of shit online for being a bit of an attack dog for Avi Yemeni and the Israeli crew.

 

But eventually he’s going to realise, guys, eventually, you can’t stay ignorant forever. Eventually, Nick Patterson will realise that he’s not jewish and the jews laugh at him when he’s not there. Avi Yemeni would go home and laugh at him. He’s going to work it out eventually. It’ll just take him a bit more time. Bullying probably won’t work. Doesn’t work on everyone, bullying. Well, there’s probably a process people go through, but everyone’s different.

 

So the next March for Australia event is on Australia Day, is that right? It’s like everyone seems to be gearing up for Australia Day. Ever since the original March for Australia, there’s been some drama, hasn’t there? And it all seems to be, at the centre of that drama, seems to be this whole Nazi debacle! Like you’re sort of Zionist-conservatives trying to Reclaim Australian patriotism from the Nazis. That seems to be the main crux of the issue. I honestly just think it should be ignored and everyone should just get together again for the next march, like I said, for that single issue thing. If you consider yourself a conservative, if you consider yourself a Christian, even if you’re like a Zionist conservative Christian, if that’s still actually a thing, it shouldn’t be. But even if you are, if that’s what you consider yourself, or even if you’re a Nazi, or a regular Australian patriot or whatever, these are all just words! You’re just saying things.

 

At the end of the day, you’re still part of the same cultural, ethnic community. Like, just look at each other. It’s easy to tell who is one of us and who is not. And you should be, in my opinion, we should be united on that basis, not the basis of word identities. Like, I’m centre Right conservative and I’m far-Right Nazi and I’m centre kind of I don’t even know, like, what is this? It’s all just words. The political spectrum is just words. This is people saying words, making noises with their mouth, which, how is that more of an identifying factor than how we look, how we think and where we come from physically and biologically? To me, it’s just like I can tell who’s on my side and who’s not usually just by looking at them. That’s the way I tend to approach politics.

 

But apparently everybody’s more intelligent than me because they invest a great deal more in their political spectrum identities. That makes you smarter than anyone who’s using biology as an identifying factor first. It’s embarrassing how the tendency people have to believe they’re super intelligent can actually confuse the fuck out of them and can actually take them away from their fundamental identity because they’re so invested in the idea of their own intelligence that they end up identifying with something that is completely alien to their own biological identity because they’re so smart, right? They spend all of their time thinking about how to verbalise or structure their identity and how to explain it to people. I don’t know. I’ve always just thought, like, being a White Australian is not like a big deal. Well, it’s not a bad thing is what I’m trying to say. Like, what’s wrong with just being a White Australian? I don’t get it. I realise that the current system wants to kill you and replace you with a more manageable slave population from overseas if you’re a White Australian, I get it.

 

And so from the perspective of the administrative class, the institutional class, there’s a lot wrong with being a White Australian. If you’re a White Australian, you’re held responsible for everything bad that ever happened in this land, ever! Especially to Aboriginal people.

 

[53:21]

 

But even if you want to extend outside of Australia, you’re responsible for all suffering of the native Maori people! Evil White colonial barbarians are responsible for the suffering of South Africans! And the only way we manage to advance our civilisation as White people was by exploiting and dominating other cultures around the world like the cruel colonials we were. And for all the suffering we’ve caused around the world, we now have to pay! We have to pay by dying quietly and getting replaced!

 

That’s the attitude of the institutional class. And it’s kind of creepy, isn’t it, to live in an environment, in a civilisation where your own government essentially wants to kill you and they think it’s justified for racial reasons. There’s like this relentless race hate that’s motivating your own governing forces and they don’t even see it. Like, they don’t even realise if you’re someone who works for media, government, Ranking police officer, if you’re actually thinking this much, you won’t even realise that you’ve been spelled by race hate propaganda, which is anti-White in essence. Like, you’ll just look at White people and you’ll even look at yourself if you’re a White person with these kind of preconceptions, and you’ll just despise that ethnicity because of what you’re being led to believe has happened as a result of that ethnicity and colonialism.

 

So it’s interesting, isn’t it? They say that evil is a point of view and every way of man is right in his own mind. And that is so true. It is so true because the people in government who are actually in the process of punishing White people for being White evil colonials, they think that they’re doing a good thing. They think it’s justified because they do believe White people have caused all that suffering. So they think it’s all justifiable and it’s all just consequence of the evil things our ancestors did.

 

Every way of man is right in his own mind. It’s eerily similar to the story of Attack on Titan. If anyone hasn’t watched Attack on Titan, you should try to watch it. I understand the first season or two might be hard to get through and you might feel like you’re just watching some stupid cartoon about these weird looking giants, but god, as it gets into the final season, man, wow! I’m of the opinion that that show has the power to deprogram Leftists. It’s that powerful! It’s a story that teaches you about race hate propaganda and how it works and how it’s used as, or to establish an effective power dynamic to unite people against that single ethnic enemy. I don’t think I’ve ever watched a story as impactful as Attack on Titan. I can’t even believe some Japanese guy came up with a story that impactful. It’s fucking crazy!

 

Or maybe it’s just that I’m used to Western media just being so bland, just so full of pathetic propaganda. You know, I watched this movie, or I tried to watch this movie a couple of weeks ago called Frankenstein. Supposed to be a movie about Frankenstein. That was one of the worst movies I’ve ever tried to watch. It went for a long time and it’s like for perhaps for maybe two hours or at least an hour and a half, I just sat there waiting for it to get good. I’m thinking:

 

“Surely with this cast, surely with the material they have to work with the amount of money they’ve spent on this film, surely it’s about to get good. At any stage now it’s going to get good!”

 

But every decision made by the main characters doesn’t make a lot of sense. And every scene is just a crybaby story about poor Frankenstein! Everyone so mean to Frankenstein and he’s just so good and kind, the poor thing! And after you’ve just been hit with that scene after scene after scene after scene for almost two hours, you’re like:

 

“Where the fuck is this story going? I can’t even watch this anymore!”

 

I just turned it off. It is just so bland, uninteresting and weird! It’s weird!

 

And so you watch Japanese animation and you get really impactful, compelling stories about ethnic tensions and race hate propaganda and political power dynamics. And even involved in that is like time manipulation and shit on top of all that stuff put into this incredible, incredible story! And it really speaks volumes of the quality of Western entertainment when it’s being completely smashed in terms of quality, thoughtfulness, creativity by random Japanese cartoonists!

 

It’s getting really hot in this part of the house that I’m in the sun is beating down on this window in front of me. I’ve got the blind down, but maybe I’m just getting frustrated. I can never tell if it’s actually hot or if I’m just getting angry. I’m one of those people that when I get frustrated, my head turns bright red and I just start getting really hot. Mepola says:

 

“Yeah, Frankenstein was absolutely awful! I saw it with the missus. We both looked at each other throughout the film, cringing. It was insufferable!”

 

It was absolutely insufferable. It was. What else did I watch recently? I watched a show that was just absolutely miserable! And it had that Australian actor in it. What’s his name again? He’s in that movie Warrior with Tom Hardy. He’s Tom Hardy’s brother in the movie Warrior. What’s that guy’s name again?

 

[59:21]

 

Anyway, it’s a movie about this guy who loses his family. He loses his family and he kind of waits for his family to come back, but they never do because they died in a fire. And that’s basically the whole movie. It’s just really depressing. But there’s several elements of the film that I thought were interesting. You know what? I don’t remember it well enough to go through it. All I know is that was laced with low key propaganda. That was just “White man bad.” You know Joel Edgerton. That’s the guy. Thank you, Joel Edgerton. You guys might know the movie I’m talking about. I think it’s on Netflix or one of the major streaming services right now! It’s just the most miserable, pointless film laced with evil propaganda. I won’t even say evil necessarily. It’s just hostile propaganda. It’s hostile!

 

Like there’s one scene that doesn’t make a lot of sense. There’s just some guy because they’re all part of some tree logging company. And there’s a guy who’s just ranting about Jesus and stuff like that. He’s just some random White guy, kind of overweight. Then this black cowboy comes into the scene, asks if anyone’s seen this guy. And the overweight White guy, we’re talking about just starts running and the black cowboy shoots him and says:

 

“He killed my brother for no reason but the colour of his skin. Anyone got a problem with what I’ve just done, speak up and we’ll have it out now.”

 

And no one says anything. And the black cowboy just rides off. And that scene is just inconsequential to the rest of the movie. It was just completely fucking unnecessary! And you realise it’s only in the movie just to put that:

 

“Ha. White guy gets shot by a black guy for noble reason!”

 

I don’t even know, man! I won’t. Like I said, I don’t remember all the scene structure, the structures of each scene well enough to actually analyze it. I’ve noticed people get really famous from analyzing films. Like The Critical Drinker on YouTube. I always liked that guy.

 

I started watching him before he had the huge following too, that Scottish character. And it’s one of those things that I think I could have done quite well, analyzing films. I was just basically always so busy trying to afford rent, losing every job that I got after three months because someone would Google my name and some woman at the HR department of whatever company I was working for would take issue with me. I was too busy doing that to actually invest any time into analyzing film.

 

But it’s really easy to take a Western film and analyze it and just unpack the propaganda. In my opinion, it’s really easy. But there’s some good influences. There’s some good people on YouTube doing that right now! And yeah, I don’t like the heat. I’m not looking forward to summer this year. It’s officially summer in Australia, but it’s been raining a lot.

 

Anyway, again, thanks for joining me everyone. I expect that this stream will be available to watch after I’ve finished it. So if you have missed the start of it, I think it should still be there. I believe that I set it up in that way, but I’m not entirely sure. I’m here to streaming through OBS because I couldn’t work out Streamyard. And there’s this new one called Restream, I think. You connect it to your Rumble account and it says that it’s connected. But then there’s no stream key and there’s no source and there’s nowhere to put that stuff. And so I’m thinking how the fuck does this work? This is not intuitive at all! They pretend it’s like the easiest thing ever to set up, but it’s really not.

 

What’s a good movie? What’s a good movie? Give me a movie, guys, that’s worth watching, in your opinion. The last good show that I watched was called God, it’s getting so hot in here. I’m sweating. I can’t last much longer, lads. The last good show I watched was Ripley. Anyone seen Ripley? It was a black and white film, I believe, set in the 60s. I think it was on Netflix. I believe that Tom Ripley is almost like a folklore character in certain cultures, but it’s about identity theft. And it makes you realise when you watch the film how easy identity theft was or would have been in the 60s. It’s not so easy now due to all developing technologies, but in the 60s, all you needed was, yeah, you could just glue your passport photo on top of someone else’s passport photo and then that’s who you were.

 

Recommend anime solo leveling. I don’t know if I have it in me to sit there and watch another anime. It’s like after I did Attack on Titan. I’ve done Attack on Titan twice as well. Because I liked it that much. I watched it again gradually. Took me months. But, yeah, I don’t know if I have any more anime in me for another six months, but I’ll try.

 

When you get to a certain age, this is a sad reality, but it is a reality nonetheless. When you get to a certain age, it’s more difficult to intake new information. It’s not impossible, but it’s more difficult. So when you’re exposed to new things, it’s kind of like you get tired really quickly. Makes you miss being a kid where everything was just, your brain is just able to absorb everything so quickly and efficiently when you’re young.

 

[1:05:18]

 

I’ve heard about Nuremberg with Russell Crowe, but I haven’t watched it yet. I saw Russell Crowe on the Joe Rogan podcast. I actually clipped it. I clipped the part where Russell Crowe was talking about how, and this links back into what we were talking about earlier in the stream. Russell Crowe is talking about nuance regarding certain Nazi officials, specifically Hermann Goring, the chief of the Luftwaffe, the German Air Force. Nuance regarding him as a person looking into his life and the circumstances of Germany before and after the war. And I clipped that and tried posting it to TikTok, and it got instantly deleted! I thought maybe it was the song that I put on with it. So I deleted the song and tried to upload it without the music. Instantly deleted again.

 

And that takes me back to what I was talking about before, how nuance cannot be permitted by the existing administrative forces. The hand behind the government, you might say. It is their job right now to eliminate nuance, to ban nuance, or to limit your access to nuance, specifically on the subject of the Second World War and any revisionism or extra information that people are making available on the Second World War, on Hitler and the Nazis. Because nuance, once made available, is eventually and with mathematical certainty going to result in people having more sympathy for Hitler and the Nazis. That’s where nuance leads.

 

Have a cold beer. How the hell is beer gonna cool me down when I’m hot? You realise alcohol raises your body temperature. Beer! I shouldn’t judge people for drinking, though. Joel drinks. Joel enjoys a beer. He seems to handle it pretty well, too. Joel’s not one of those people who loses his shit when he gets drunk. He kind of becomes more entertaining. He loosens up a little bit, and it doesn’t seem to impact his intelligence at all! If anything, it just slightly sharpens it.

 

They’re incapable of allowing nuance. It’s not that they’re incapable, it’s that they’re absolutely unwilling because they understand the destructive power of nuance. That’s what I’m trying to get at. Anyone who is permitting nuance or encouraging nuance, that is more open discussion or objective discussion regarding Second World War and Hitler specifically, will be considered a dangerous enemy of the administrative forces of government right now!

 

It’s really important to understand that, too. They’re not just disregarding National Socialism as incontrovertibly evil out of ignorance. It’s not out of ignorance. It’s very deliberate. Because any open discussion on the topic is eventually going to lead to a broader and better understanding of the topic. And that is not in the interests of current government media alliance to have you actually understanding the Second World War in any broad capacity. You’re supposed to just write Hitler and the Nazis off as evil, and that’s it. You’re not supposed to look into it beyond that.

 

Basically, this whole society is built on not allowing nuance on this particular topic. [chuckling] Again, they’re going to lock down social media. I think I mentioned that, but I didn’t really unpack it fully. It begins with this whole:

 

“Oh, we’re protecting people under 16 by not allowing them on social media!”

 

That’s just them getting their foot in the door when they can work out how to accomplish that and force the social media companies to abide by that rule, they’ll take the next step. Not really sure what the next step will be, but the goal will be to lock down social media specifically. And the final goal will be to censor the Internet in entirety.

 

I actually saw a video recently of a guy who managed to get his hands on two smartphones from North Korea. And both of these phones were totally locked down. They already come with heaps of apps, but they’re several years behind the technology of the phones we have available to us. There is access to the Internet, but it’s like an internal Internet controlled by the government. And you have to put your details in. You have to punch in all your details before you can use it. So they know exactly who you are and what you’re looking at, even though what’s available is still censored and controlled by them. Just in case you find a way to use that Internet service to get beyond what they can control, then they know who you are and where to find you and I found it curious because when I was watching the video, the guy presenting this information to people, he was like:

 

“I wonder if we’ll ever see the fall of North Korea in our lifetime. I think we will?”

 

And I laughed because I thought to myself:

 

“Not only are you not going to see the fall of North Korea and the circumstances in North Korea, you’re going to see those same circumstances implemented in the West. It’s actually the opposite. You’re not going to see the fall of stuff like this. You’re going to see it becoming a widespread thing!”

 

But at least North Koreans have national pride laced into their particular brand of communism, which is kind of like. What do they call it? It’s like National Bolshevism. Nazbol. I suppose that’s how you would summarize the North Korean system. The kind of totalitarian system we’re going to end up with is an Internet that’s totally censored and controlled. But you’re also not allowed to express any national or ethnic pride because that exhibits opposition to the dominant ideology within Western society, which is multiculturalism, everyone’s equal, right? So national ethnic pride is a problem for the current ruling ideology. So that won’t be allowed.

 

It’s almost like North Korea will be a preferable alternative. The system of North Korea will be a preferable alternative to what’s around the corner for the West. But I don’t know, maybe even though we’re going to go through a time where everyone’s going to jail for no reason other than ideology. You’ve got America. I just saw in the news recently that America is like, probing Australia to try to gather as much information on how corrupt Australia actually is and how much damage like multicultural dogma and mass immigration has done to Australia, where that damage has been done specifically and who’s responsible for it, at an institutional level. America is apparently collecting data on that subject. I’d say they’re pretty late to the party. It’s been going on for a long fucking time!

 

[1:12:08]

 

And my guess is the reason they’re collecting data is to work out how bad the situation really is and whether it’s reversible. Well, certain elements of America, anyway. It could just be all like certain elements of American government pretending that they’re going to do something to help Western society, but really they’re powerless to do anything at all because they’re too under the thumb.

 

Yeah, people like Avi Yemeni won’t go to jail. Yeah, I’m talking about, like actual Australian nationalists, not T-shirt salesmen. Not your (((dual citizens))) who really just are champions of Israel and some sort of subversive foreign policy. Would I even consider Avi to be a champion of subversive foreign policy? I don’t know. All I know is that this guy, you can’t compare this guy to an actual someone like me, for example, we’re totally different.

 

I actually watched Avi Yemeni kick Hugo Lennon. Is it Hugo Lennon? Auspill. Try to remove him from a rally. He claims that it wasn’t him removing Hugo. It was Nick Patterson removing him.

 

But it’s clearly Avi standing there arguing with him, coming up with reasons why he should leave:

 

“You’re a Nazi. You’re wearing a Helly Hansen jacket. That’s Nazism. How dare you!”

 

I thought it was amusing how Hugo accused Harvey of schizophrenia because I think there’s a high rate of schizophrenia in the jewish population. I think that’s statistically fact. It’s got something to do with their breeding patterns, or a genetic variation that produces higher levels of schizophrenia on a per capita basis.

 

But I don’t know, I’ve got to watch that again. I haven’t actually. I don’t have in my mind an effective memory of that video. I’ve only watched it once, so I did notice that not many people were on his side, though. Not many people appreciated Avi just yelling “Nazi” at Auspill because of a jacket brand he was wearing and having him removed from a rally when he was just standing there on his own, not bothering anyone, trying to listen to the speakers. Yeah, everyone in the comments was against him. That’s understandable why.

 

As I said, any real Australian nationalist is going to be focused on a single issue right now, which is stopping immigration. If they’re focused on anything else, especially “Nazi hunting”, you should just treat them as an enemy to the cause, because all they’re doing is diluting and detracting from that single issue, which is going to unite everyone! People can only be united by a single issue. The moment they detract from that issue or they’re detracted from that issue by someone trying to drag their attention away elsewhere, then the whole cause begins to crash. It’s very simple.

 

Well, thanks for joining me, guys. First solo stream I’ve done in several years. MaybeNextTime I will play that game. But funnily enough, to my surprise, I didn’t have any trouble talking this long. Usually I would have gotten bored 40 minutes ago.

 

So we got Superchats, don’t we? Is that how it works? We read out Superchats. I think I’ve got them all here, but I’m not entirely sure. Philip Mellor gave $5 and says:

 

“Hail Boomer Tech. I’ve missed my fix of the Joel and Blair Show.”

 

Am I Boomer Tech? I am pretty old now. Neil tells me that all the time. Neil Erikson, if you guys know who that is, an old friend of mine. He keeps reminding me that:

 

“Bro, we’re old now. You realise that there’s a whole new generation of activists. We’re the old guys now!”

 

I’m thinking:

 

“Yeah, I suppose he’s right about that. Fuck, when did that happen?”

 

Pedro Escobar gives $20.

 

Thank you very much. He says:

 

“Shekels for you. Hail Australia. You are the vanguard for us all.”

 

I’m just a guy, man! I’m just a guy in a room right now! But thanks. I do what I can. The Queen’s Guard gave $5 and says:

 

“Do you ever think you’ll inevitably have to take up a more free frontline position in nationalism again? Like starting up UPF again or becoming a politician or something?”

 

First we have to get through this period of going to jail for what we believe and surviving the political policing. We need to adapt to that and work out how bad that’s actually going to be. So first we need to get our doors kicked in early in the morning, get arrested, go to jail for ideological reasons. Work out how we’re going to get out of jail and then develop a strategy for stopping them doing that to us in the future.

 

So that’s what’s in the immediate future for us activists of the nationalist cause. We’ll talk about taking more frontline positions up again after we’ve been through that and adapted to it. Queens Guard again says, Gives $2 and says:

 

“Tell us about UPF days, Blair. Staunching pedos, [word unclear], bashing Antifa, etc.”

 

What do I say specifically? It was all very, it was all very impulsive. The United Patriots Front, I’ll be honest, on my behalf at least, it was all very impulsive. I didn’t really have much of a long term plan. I just had a Facebook page. We had that idea, that single issue, as I mentioned several times in the stream beforehand. And we just ran with it. We ran with it and we tried to affect public discourse as much as possible. And we knew eventually we had to build a political party.

 

But interestingly, as soon as we segued into building a political party, that’s when all the trouble started. That’s when I got charged, me and two of my colleagues, actually, we all got charged with what was essentially a speech crime for a Facebook post, “intent to incite ridicule” on Facebook. My bank accounts got frozen and deleted. I got blacklisted from Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, all within three months. And I couldn’t even communicate with my supporters to tell them what was going on in court. And suddenly due to all that random intervention, the political party was basically bust. And we didn’t really know what to do, because we didn’t have like a physical place where we all went. We didn’t have a physical membership necessarily. All it was a Facebook page. We just had social media and that was it.

 

And that was the mistake we made, I suppose, because at the end of the day someone just pushed a button:

 

“Delete them off Facebook, delete their bank accounts, charge them with hate speech. Done!”

 

[1:19:23]

 

 

It was that easy for them to get rid of us back in the day. I gotta be honest though, actually, I’ll tell that story another time. That’s a little bit too much for how much brain power I have remaining. The Queens Guard again sends $2:

 

“You should start vlogging, Blair. I was just thinking of whether Nick Patterson would have the same balls to confront and try to kick you out if you decided to attend one of his Zio-Christ coming events.”

 

Personally, I’ve never had an issue With Nick Patterson. And I went to his gym once. It was probably three or four years ago. I went to his gym and we did some training. Kickboxing training. He used to do kickboxing, I think it was kickboxing or maybe some form of MMA. And, yeah, he used to rant about Christian stuff back then, too. So he’s always been into the same stuff. But I don’t know. I’m not really in a position where I’m attending protests in the capacity of participating. If I was going to attend something, it would just be to listen. But Hugo Lennon just did that. He attended one of these rallies these guys had, just to listen to the speakers. And he was ejected because Avi decided he was a Nazi as a consequence of his jacket brand [Helly Hanson], which is the same brand I’m wearing, by the way. It’s becoming quite popular. It’s good stuff, actually.

 

It reminds me of Kathmandu before Kathmandu got shit! Kathmandu used to be good, quality merchandise, but then it’s like they sold out to some cheap shit! There’s different qualities of Chinese merch, right? There’s some good factories in China, and but they’re only like 10% of the factories, then 90% of the factories just dirt shit!

 

And it’s like Kathmandu started in the top 10% and then they ended up in the 90% ones. And now. Now it just sucks! Their merch doesn’t really feel good anymore. But this stuff feels like the way Kathmandu merch used to feel. It’s good shit!

 

The Bearded Indian sends through $8. Thank you. He says:

 

“Nazi smears. I respond, the National Socialist German Workers party dissolved in 1945. So does that make you a commie? And people usually shut the fuck up!”

 

Right. Are you saying you call people a communist when they call you a Nazi? I don’t think that’s powerful enough, personally. You’re better off calling people, anyone who says you’re a Nazi you can presuppose that they support mass immigration into the West. And so you should just call them a rapist! Because the immigrants that are coming into this country are, per capita, they’re committing more rapes than, like, standard Australians would, by and large.

 

So if you’re an advocate for mass immigration, you’re an advocate for rape. So you need to use language which is a little bit more potent than communist. You see, Nazi and racists. Racist doesn’t carry the same weight as it used to, which is why the media stopped using it. Because it’s been overused. But Nazi, or neo-Nazi and White supremacists. These are curse words which have a particular bite to them. And you can only match that level of bite with something like rapists or murderer! Rapists might be a better one. But you don’t need to concern yourself so much with whether or not the word can be applied logically or truthfully, because your enemy is not concerned with that, you just need to be concerned with the impact the accusation has and the effect it has on your opponent in an argument. So they call you a Nazi. You say:

 

“Well, you’re a rapist. You’re a rapist dog!”

 

You know what I mean? You can practice stuff like that you need to use language which is just as strong or has an even stronger impact on them than the Nazi phrase or smear has on you. Broden Nielsen sends $10. Thank you and says:

 

“Hail from Sweden!”

 

Well, hello back to you from Australia, Sweden. The only person I know from Sweden is Marcus Follin, also known as the Golden One. I can’t say that we talk all the time, but we occasionally nod to each other from across the pond, that is almost the rest of the world. We’re very far away. But he’s always been someone I’ve appreciated and sort of looked up to, Marcus. So whenever I think of Sweden, I usually think of Marcus because he’s the only person I’ve spoken to from Sweden.

 

I’m not sure what “gifted subscription” means, but thank you. Thank you to Broden Nielsen for that. And look, guys, I’m like, roasting in here! I’m cooking, so I’m gonna go pretty soon. I hope the stream has been comparably as entertaining as it would have been with Joel. I know that I can’t provide the same level of intellectual discourse that Joel can. It’s funny, actually, when you sit on stream with Joel, you feel kind of dumb when you listen to Joel’s platitudes and how excellent he is at actually phrasing or piecing together an explanation or argument, especially when you already agree with him, by and large, you kind of just feel like nothing you can say is going to match the level of intelligence that Joel’s put out there or expressed.

 

[1:25:18]

 

So usually what I do is actually try to play devil’s advocate with him and act like I’m opposing him on a few things because that actually tends to open his mind up even more.

 

Well, thanks, guys. I suppose that’s it. Cheers for joining me. Was there anything I didn’t touch on that I wanted to? Well, I hope no one is like, disheartened or believes what I’ve said here is like a black pill or something like that it’s not that way at all! When I say that everyone who is influential in nationalism is going to jail, it’s not that much of a big deal. Like, we have good prisons in Australia and it’s relatively easy to spend time in prison. It tends to be a bit of a holiday in my experience. However, I’ve never been to jail in solitary confinement as a result of my ideology.

 

But when you look at everything, the way it’s happening, what the Federal police are saying, the way they’re targeting influential people who are advocates for our kind of ideology, the ideology that I’ve always advocated for, then you just need to be objective about it. You need to be honest with yourself and you need to be like, okay, we’re going into a new threshold of political policing where just being me is going to be illegal! You know, just being a nationalist of the ethnic kind is basically going to be illegal.

 

And I don’t think anyone should be too concerned about that, though. It’s just part of how politics goes throughout history. Things get pretty bad and then they sort of settle down and then they get pretty bad again. And you shouldn’t take things too seriously like that because, I don’t know, life goes on for most of us, [chuckling] but it doesn’t concern me that much. Like I said, it’s all just part of the game. I just do what I can to make sure that it’s not too easy for them to throw me in jail for ideological reasons. As you guys know, I’m pretty careful with the way I word things and I keep my nose clean, so that’s about as much as I can do.

 

I hope the quality of this has been okay. I hope the quality’s been okay. I use one of these little Bluetooth mics because, how strange is this? I have this huge Rode microphone which is like, it plugs into your computer, like, USB attachment so it uses your computer’s power supply.

 

But then you’ve got this little thing here, this little Bluetooth mic, which is it operates through a receiver and stuff. But that little thing is like, significantly better quality and more powerful than this. How does that work? That’s like alien technology, lads. I don’t understand it. I remember how much I was astounded by our technology had developed after I got out of jail when I was younger. I went to prison in 2011, I believe. I think it was 2011. I believe it was December 2011, and I got out for the first time. I got out November 2012, right before my birthday, I think. And before I went to prison, I was working for a building company and we just had work phones with buttons on them. Just your standard, like, button phone. The company gave everyone these phones. It was just part of working for the company. It was the deal. And then I’m remanded in custody for a while and I’m out on bail, but then I’m back in jail, whatever.

 

And then a couple of years later, I’m out of prison, I’m on parole, and everyone has these smartphones. A friend of mine gives me an old apple iPhone 4, and for the first time I’m exposed to Instagram and Facebook on a phone. And I’m like:

 

“Fucking, wow! Where the fuck did this technology come from? How does this even work?”

 

You know how people speculate that during the Second World War, Hitler must have been in touch with aliens or something, because how did he manage to develop all of this crazy technology that no one else has heard of? How did they build jet planes for the first time? And I don’t even know. There’s like a long list of technological developments that the Germans were responsible for during the Second World War.

 

And it’s like I feel the same about the development of all this micro technology, the smartphones, and how much data that they can actually fit on a solid state drive these days, which is like as big as your finger. Considering how fast it developed, it’s fucking incredible! It doesn’t make a lot of sense how we went from like Nokia brick phones when I was like 13 or 14 to literally like five years later, everyone’s got an iPhone. Like, how did it develop that quickly? I think the way, you know, someone in tech would explain it is everything just got like, shrunk down and multiplied, and they just kept shrinking things down and things kept multiplying, shrunk and multiplied over and over again!

 

All right, well, I’m glad the quality of the stream was good. I didn’t expect it would be going through just OBS. But 65 Stoney sends $20. Thanks, mate. And he said:

 

“Drop Turtle Wow Server and Faction Blair currently on classic anniversary.”

 

Hang on, I’ll have to look it up. Have to look it up. I’ll have to log into it. Hang on. What server am I in? Definitely I play Alliance because I’m not a degenerate mutant. Yeah, I’m Alliance Master Race.

 

[1:31:20]

 

I’ll probably show you guys actually. Let’s jump on. If I go display capture and I put this down here like that this is my hardcore character. I’ve got a few characters. I’ve been playing this server for about. I’ve been playing the server when it first came out, I think. Oh, shit! Hang on. Let me make sure I kill this guy. Just going to move my streaming thing over here to this screen so I can see what I’m doing. I’m getting lag. I don’t know. My bags are full.

 

So, yeah, this is my Paladin. He’s level 37. I made this character probably about two or three years ago. That’s how much chance I get to actually play this game. But I’ve had to be really careful. Had to be very careful with this character because if this character dies, he’s gone! It’s just over for me. As you can see. If you play actual Vanilla World of Warcraft, you might notice that the talents are slightly different and my abilities are slightly different too. In this one, you get a combination of strikes which actually make playing Retribution Paladin a little bit more interesting. You get Holy Strike and Crusader Strike, which share a cooldown. So you choose between them and they provide unique buffs. So you ideally want to use both of them when you’re fighting something. I’ll give you an example here.

 

So this is the best Seal you get, which is Seal of Command. It basically gives you a chance to do double damage on an attack. And because I just used. Because I just use Crusader Strike, it increases my attack and casting speed by 3%, which stacks three times. And then Holy Strike gives you strength increase, which is also stackable. I’m gonna die, man! What am I doing? Imagine if I died. This character, that’s years old, you forget how much. Oh, don’t heal! Fuck you! Don’t worry. I still have ways out here. I’ve still got bubble. Oh, I’m out of here. You can’t take any chances, guys, on these hardcore characters. Let’s get the fuck out of here before she comes back with her mates.

 

I really should do some work. I’ve got to start making money. Yeah, see, she’s coming back with her mates. I told you. And look at my health. This is what they do. These fucking mongrel half breeds! Look at them! Half horse, half human. What an abomination! I shouldn’t be here anyway. I don’t know what I’m doing around Moradin. Let’s head back.

 

I’m about to close the stream. I think of I don’t think I want to become one of those video game streamers. Someone said once, actually, that the day Blair starts streaming a game is the day Australia, …

 

[stream ends]

 

 

[1:34:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/12/2026 = 57)

goyslopdesigns
2 days ago
blair is chronically correct and early on censorship and overreach. been a month tho buddy give us a stream

katana17
2 days ago
[Blair Cottrell – The Joel Davis Situation – Jan 9, 2026 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2026/01/09/blair-cottrell-the-joel-davis-situation-jan-9-2026-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell gives us an update on Joel Davis, a political prisoner being held in Sydney’s Long Bay Correctional Complex, in a punishment cell without basic amenities, all for making a social media post critical of the politician Allegra Spender who had called for him and other NSN members to be jailed for a peaceful legal protest urging that the all-powerful jewish lobby in Australia be abolished. That lobby has had Davis denied bail and held in detention since he was arrested on Nov 20, 2025, at Bondi. – KATANA]
1
0

Delete
TheHender
1 week ago
I notice that you ask Joel obvious questions or devil’s advocate questions (the ones people think are ‘black pill’) so that Joel can lead off from there and expound on that topic. There is a reason for this and it seems a lot of people just don’t get that. It is that or you’re just a dumb dumb, Blair hahaha
1
0

TheHender
1 week ago
I enjoy playing games while listening to podcasts. Currently on a spreadsheet-like game, Football Manager 2024. Or I will be on Turtle WoW while listening to the backlog of you and Joel. Add me if you want: Waughloch

TheHender
1 week ago
The moment I heard about the Social Media Ban for young people, I knew immediately they were aware that the “H*tler Youth” is rising and the government knows it. They’re trying to get ahead of the game.

kitsubot
VerifiedSupporter
1 week ago
The far right whites worldwide should converge on the only white nation left with free speech and gun rights – namely the United States. We are the only nation with a chance, our right wingers are out breeding liberals, we out voted them several times recently, and the Australian stock are descended from people who left England and Ireland to build again. It is your heritage to leave when the government oversteps their bounds. As a heritage American myself i welcome the real Aussies to come build with us here where we still have a shot. We can always come back and conquer Australia with u again in the future but for now you are welcome here.

goyslopdesigns
2 weeks ago
one stream a month? I thought this dude was an influencer

leibekohne
3 weeks ago
Blair I would blame Australian melting Pot non-white situation women not because they are weaker vessel but because they are evil by not having children. Those young unvaccinated white bitches who hate men =misandry should fuck them and have every year child,saying “I do not know who the father is, there were few of them it was one day stand, I was drunk”. gov. will pay them and give housing at least that way they will blocked street shitters and other non-whites scum savage aboerectus out of free housing market. I know is bad advice but better then die young of alcohol drugs and be replace. Perhaps bastardized children will fight for us those treasonous filth politician and feminists.

leibekohne
3 weeks ago
Is jew? word allowed, Hitler is banned??in Australia??

SolarStormMan
3 weeks ago
Been waiting for you to do a solo stream while Joel is locked up. Hopefully the Joel and Blair show can return in early January
1
0

whitehonkymonkey
3 weeks ago
the thought police have arrived so its up to us to be smarter and find some other way to get around there BS laws.

goyslopdesigns
3 weeks ago
bro is an influencer but can’t stream once a week and only pulls up for an hour on other streams

Gabe0007
4 weeks ago
I’m at 31 minutes mark. Blair! YOU’RE WRONG..!!!!!!!! WRONG!!! >>>> There’s another way, big man! THE ONLY WAY FORWARD OR YOU, AS WHITE AUSTRALIANS WILL BE NO MORE!!!!!!! CLICK ON THIS PICTURE!!! : https://i.imgur.com/50D5YeO.jpeg You WHITE Aussie boys either UNDERSTAND this or you, as White Australians will be no more. ( I cannot type it more simple as this. ) And I don’t want it, you don’t want it, none of us WHITE MEN want it..!! But there will be no other peaceful option.

Gabe0007
4 weeks ago
Meanwhile here in the f.cked up UK…. : Woman’s little daughter was denied by LEFTIE ( all schools are fkn’ leftist here! ) SCHOOL, – because of her mother’s hurty words! LINK : https://freespeechunion.org/lucy-connollys-daughter-banned-from-new-school/?v=7885444af42e

TACTICALBOY88
4 weeks ago
Merry Christmas Heil Brother o/ 110

MigC
4 weeks ago
I could listen to this man talk all day. God bless you, Blair.

Sinagoglies
4 weeks ago
Oh, that’s why downplays Israhell and MoSSAD, glorifies war and unjust invasions; and doesn’t like conspiracies!? Occultist Joel & co always plays down soviet fake Israel and glorifies war Kosher Collett and Joel Davis (Antifa Man) https://www.bitchute.com/video/XsI7RgOHpdVG Joel Davis Baphomet Tattoo https://www.bitchute.com/video/ijm47i4rYBkd Thomas Sewell admits to Snitching (and Black and Tans in his family (British Bolsheviks) attacking and invading Ireland. https://www.bitchute.com/video/hoOljtlDj2vb Occult Forces (1943) National Socialist Anti-Freemasonry Film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW4NzVxhnUg The hard-line anti-occultist faction within the NS movement was concentrated in the SD, the Sicherheitsdienst or “security service” of the SS under Reinhard Heydrich (Roman Catholic). They were largely kept in check from 1933 to 1941 by other NS officials including the staff of Rudolf Hess Thomas Sewell wants esoteric Hitlerism! I see now– Joel loves his trance techno non music! Psytrance music bridges the divide between secular and religious Jews in Israel https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/dancing-on-common-ground https://harvardindependent.com/kleztronica-how-techno-raves-modernize-traditional-jewish-music/ Jewish Techno Party https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep_35FTnYVA&list=RDEp_35FTnYVA&start_radio=1 https://supertravelr.com/en/trip/israel/heres-ultra-orthodox-jewish-sect-israel-rave-trance-music-7E4A9E9D97/ In 1933, the Vatican signed a Concordat with the Hitler & the Nazi Party. This made the Vatican the first state of officially recognise Nazi Germany. Find out more on our online resource https://www.concordatwatch.eu/showkb.php?org_id=858&kb_header_id=752&kb_id=1211 HITLER SPEAKS OF CHRISTIANITY AND HIS AND GERMANY’S CHRISTIAN FAITH https://www.bitchute.com/video/vBiW14nRKDNI/ https://www.wikiart.org/en/adolf-hitler/mother-mary-with-the-holy-child-jesus-christ

IcarusWax
4 weeks ago
We will win.

jonkvh
4 weeks ago
Great stream Blair.

Bigboy6669
4 weeks ago
hail

DonaldDucktator
Supporter
4 weeks ago
Wow, you really nailed the ending of this solo stream Give yourself some credit this was very enjoyable.

TVR_
4 weeks ago
Great stream Blair

amundsentb
4 weeks ago
Great stream!

wyrdweasel
4 weeks ago
Haven’t seen the recent ‘Frankenstein’ but the director Guillermo del Toro is a leftist so not surprised it’s a fail with no balls. Try the 2014 film ‘Unbroken’ for the true survival story of a WWII airman who went through hell (surprisingly well directed by Angelina Jolie but don’t let it put you off).

loosifur
4 weeks ago
https://www.linkedin.com/in/lucy-manly-8a2aa851/

shorterboy
5 weeks ago
Use TOX or SimpleX to create online spaces

› Show 1 reply
shorterboy
5 weeks ago
Frankenstein was written by a woman, your supposed to feel sympathy for the alien because female sex preferences

shorterboy
5 weeks ago
buy yacht a starlink mini and make them work to catch you while sail the coast

TinyHatRemover
Supporter
5 weeks ago
“You’ve had too much to think” -Australia police
9
0

SomerledsBlood
5 weeks ago
here’s a movie recommendation for you Blair: The Proposition (2005)
3
0

› Show 1 reply
Goraxium
5 weeks ago
The funniest part of Joel’s arrest is that ASIO has warned the government about men who do not believe that there is a political solution to the bullshit the government is forcing on people, and the government is proving it. “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable”. ASIO needs to start arresting politicians for their deliberate attacks on social cohesion, because if there is no political solution…
3
0

Girnigoe
5 weeks ago
Good to find you streaming! Greetings from America. Joel will be avenged and return to erode the social fabric again! Here’s to the White Australia Party. The ZOG knows how popular it will be, and what a problem it will be for them, probably even more so than what happened in Germany recently. Hail!
8
0

Tachibana88
5 weeks ago
I watched The King on Netflix recently, and it was actually really good. it’s from 2019, about the rise of Henry V.
2
0

charliebrownau
5 weeks ago
Gday Blairs Solo Sunday Stream was really good I hope he continues it each Sunday No Victory without Struggle _________ Regards Charlie b * Email – charliebrownau@protonmail.com * Videos – https://poast.tv/c/charliebrownau/videos * Telegram – t.me/s/Charliebrownau
2
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
5 weeks ago
Blair watch Mr Inbetween, its a great Australian series
4
0

› Show 1 reply
WhiteBitchTripleSix
Supporter+
5 weeks ago
I prefer to fidget while learning as well. Especially when I had to sit in a class for 8 hours a day..
3
0

CovenantSolidier
Supporter
5 weeks ago
Hail from Montana brother
9
0

FellowComrade
Supporter+
5 weeks ago
I love how Blair is so measured in his perspective. He has seen shit and created things. Been through a lot, but still comes across as a good guy who has his mind in the right place. Gotta appreciate anyone who can handle the world coming down on them and retain the twinkle in their eye.
11
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
5 weeks ago
I genuinely sense a sadness in you Blair like you really miss your friends when they’re locked up, as a man you wanna be surrounded by your mates building something positive
5
0

TraskJackson
5 weeks ago
Heck-yeah. Glad to be here.
9
0

Cardiff4
Verified
5 weeks ago
Great Talk Blair. I empathize with your frustration of technology, it gets to me sometimes as well. Your mic/sound and video quality were really good. For a minute I thought you were in a jail cell…. solid white walls. haha. Glad your not. Cheers Mate. Looking forward to hearing from you again. FREE JOEL….. Helly Hansen
13
0

GreenGladeAryan
5 weeks ago
The Iron Claw 2023
1
0

Ethereal1562
5 weeks ago
Good to see you Blair. You mentioned the rapid development of technology after you got out of prison, and WW2 etc. You might find Diana Pasulka’s research on ‘human satellites’ and NASA’s secret programs, where they receive ‘downloads’ of information, interesting. Sounds schizo, but she is a legit professor and researcher.
2
0

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter++
5 weeks ago
Fuck i didn’t know you were streaming!! If you do this regularly I’ll definitely be here and donating my guy. I’ll pay attention to telegram for noti’s from now on. o/
15
0

AngloSaxon88
5 weeks ago
Even here in Scandinavia Blair and Joel are missed. It’s great to hear from you Blair!
30
0

Greatsouthern
5 weeks ago
Is anyone else being asked to “verify” their rumble account?
2
0

› Show 2 replies
Greatsouthern
5 weeks ago
Great to hear from you Blair.
33
0

› Show 2 replies
LachlanMD
5 weeks ago
Heil
14
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We should be live. It is the 19th of December, 2024, and another show for you guys this evening. Our big stories from last week seem to continue to be the big stories again. The war on freedom by the jews perpetuates. So we’ll be talking about that. And with the new laws that they’re proposing to bring it into Victoria because there was a synagogue fire that was allegedly, I think a jew did it. But they haven’t actually determined who did it. But that’s good enough reason, even though they haven’t determined who did it or why, to take away freedoms to politically demonstrate peacefully. Like, what’s the connection? So we’ll discuss that.

 

We’ll also discuss the development of the Parminder Singh Gate or Parmindigate, as it’s been called on Twitter, where, yeah, One Nation have been running this Indian candidate and it’s caused, I mean, the story., … There’s so many new elements to the story. I wrote an opinion piece on it a few days ago for The Noticer and there’s even more elements of the story coming through now. So we’re going to talk about that.

 

Also, there’s been another shooting in America that’s kind of gay and weird, but instead of was, I guess, at least it’s a different shooting than last week. But yeah, this teenage girl, you know, trying to be edgy, doing some dumb school shooting. The alleged manifesto that was her manifesto was, yeah, really like incoherent and weak. So we’ll be discussing that and some other things. Thomas Sewell will be joining us soon as well, so we’ll get his thoughts as well this evening on all of this.

 

But how you doing this evening, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: All right. I just worked out how to share this on an X account because on my phone I can’t see a lot of your tweets. There’s some sort of ban or layer of censorship on the posts that you make. And I still haven’t actually worked out how to get around that on my phone, I think I can see them on my laptop. So I was able to share for the first time, I’m sharing our show on X and I’m glad I figured out how to do it.

 

Other than that, yeah, I’m fine, man! Everything’s good. Been training pretty hard, which has resulted in me feeling a bit more stressed. Well, not feeling stressed, but my body is showing signs of stress. Like I have a little, a mini, little ulcer on my tongue, probably from training too much. But I’m getting more time to train because it’s coming up to the end of the year and clients are starting to drop off, people are getting ready for Christmas, and I have more free time. I’m glad for that you know, it gives me the time, the chance to get inside my own head and process my own thoughts, which I really enjoy doing. Actually, I feel like if I don’t get that time, I get very angry.

 

But, yeah, a little bit tired, but I’ll stay with it. Like you said, the news seems to be just further developments on what we talked about last week, but still interesting.

 

Yeah, just a little segue before we get stuck into it, before Tom arrives, I was just scrolling X as one does, and I saw a picture of what I thought was a young me. I’m like:

 

“Whoa, that looks like me when I was 16 and in construction.”

 

But then on closer inspection, it wasn’t me, but it was posted by Victoria police. They’re looking for a guy. Yeah, see if you can bring it up, because they’re looking for a guy in Balaclava, which is a suburb down in Victoria, Australia, which is heavily populated by jews. I think.

 

Joel Davis: Police are investigating a report of racially motivated offensive behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know what that means exactly, but that looks exactly like me when I was a teenager. Look at that. This looks like skinny, younger me coming home from work.

 

Joel Davis: Pre-steroid Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Come on man! Anyway, scroll down. Scroll down because police.

 

Joel Davis: I got my cop coming in. He didn’t do nothing!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I know. I saw that. And I think it’s one of the best, but keep scrolling down. I mean, everybody, this is a serious story, right? Offensive behaviour, racially motivated offensive conduct. Should read the comments for more information.

 

Joel Davis: What is the charge? Speaking of slur, a succulent ethnic slur! [chuckling] Being White in public is now illegal! Where’s his energy? Motivated violence against Whites by Sudanese immigrants at train stations. Comfy, friend with the big comment there? Yeah, what the fuck is offensive behaviour?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s got to be a list.

 

Joel Davis: Even if I knew him, I wouldn’t report it to you fucking pigs! All the boys in there and the girls. Yeah, look at this guy. He’s just photoshopped a jew’s face. Arrest all people who look like this. People are just going hard in the comments.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what community pressure looks like. That’s what a legitimate, organic community response to a police story looks like. If you give everyone free speech, this is what happens. That’s why free speech is a great thing! That’s why we support free speech, because that gives us the ability to speak. And this is what happens. A lot more people out there have more based opinions than you realise. And threads like that demonstrate that reality.

 

[05:30]

 

Joel Davis: Quite funny. Well, I hope they don’t catch him.

 

But if you do have any information on this individual. Please forward it to the NSN contact bot. We’d love to recruit him. We’re pretty racially motivated ourselves.

 

But anyway, [chuckling] that is a funny story. I mean, hopefully doesn’t get in trouble. I don’t know what happened there, but it’s obviously a nothing burger. Offensive behaviour is the most ridiculous crime. Like, how is that even a crime? We should have a right to behave offensively in this country. I mean, what the hell, we’re Australians! This is ridiculous! But I digress.

 

As I said, there’s a few big stories to talk about the first thing I want to talk about, Blair, you were shutting me down last week because I was talking about how that Luigi, I can’t remember his last name, some Italian shit! That Luigi guy in America who shot the CEO of some health insurance company or whatever. I was saying that the terror, it was kind of gay and boring. You know, his terrorism was boring. It wasn’t interesting. This is a far cry from the interesting terrorists of yesteryear. You know, like Ted Kaczynski or whatever. I’m not going to rattle off all the names. And you were trying to shut me down. You know, you were saying, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Hey, that’s a pretty rough way to put it. I wasn’t trying to shut you down.

 

Joel Davis: Just trying to cancel me. I wasn’t being politically correct enough. The “woke” were coming at me.

 

Blair Cottrell: We need to be smart. If you’re going to start talking about sensitive topics, we need to skim across the surface of them without getting too analytical, you know, sharing opinions. You know, that’s the way things are. I don’t want to be, …

 

Joel Davis: Like I said terrorism, but I was saying the opposite. I was saying that this particular piece of terrorism is gay. And it’s like the, like terrorism has lost its way. And then I think that was an accurate call because then an even gayer form of terrorism happened in America this week, or a few days ago with this 15 year old girl who’s a little edgelord retard decided to shoot up her school and then kill herself for literally no reason. I read the manifesto this week.

 

Blair Cottrell: What is this? I haven’t seen any information on this. Have you got something to bring up on the screen?

 

Joel Davis: I can find something in a sec.

 

But basically she’s a 15 year old girl. Can’t remember her name. But the manifesto was just like deranged rambling about how she doesn’t like her parents and like life sucks! And it was like this like nihilistic yap that had no like discernible point. Like there’s no political message. There was no real existential message. Like it just seemed like she was like moody, like some emo moody chick. And then she’s gone along and like done something crazy like that. Terrorism has just become gay now. I said something on Twitter, like:

 

“Terrorism is like where rock music was in the late 2000s.”

 

You know, it’s just gay and lame at this point. And the only people that take it seriously are like retarded teenage girls. She was obviously trying to do some kind of like Columbine shooting, you know, homage. But at least the Columbine guys had cool clothes and stuff. They were retarded as well. But at least they had like an aesthetic. They had like an energy.

 

The point that I’m making actually is ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] should be happy about my message. My message is that terrorism has become gay. Don’t try terrorism because you’re going to come off like a fag. Like everyone that’s trying to do this stuff lately. That [guy] set himself on fire for Palestine. I can’t remember his name. That was lame as well. It’s all become very like played out at this point. It’s been done. Plenty of others have got the headlines and they’ve done it cooler than you and more interestingly than you. And it’s old at this point! You know, it’s like trying to make a grunge band. It’s like the 90s was like three decades ago. What are you doing? Like, it’s over! No one’s gonna care. You know what I’m saying?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose so.

 

I don’t have a lot of thoughts on the matter. I just think shooting or killing random people because you’re mad about something in order to make a statement and have an impact on society or to attempt to have an impact on society. I just think it’s deranged bullshit, man! I always have. I don’t really find any sort of terrorism interesting. I’m not one of those people who’s like:

 

“Let’s study these psychos and work out the way the psychology of a pervert, or a murderer, or a paedophile!”

 

That’s what modern psychology does. It’s like:

 

“Let’s deconstruct and understand them.”

 

No, you don’t have to understand these people. You just execute them. They’re defective and you just execute them. You know, I have to say that. I can’t say anything even remotely in support of politically motivated violence. Very sensitive times in Australia.

 

[10:28]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, that’s what I’m saying. I’m criticising politically motivated violence. I’m saying every time someone seems to engage in it just keeps getting gayer and gayer. Like, I mean, terrorism is either gay or it’s totally fake! Like this fake jew firebombing on the synagogue. I mean you had 9/11 where the jews blew up the Twin Towers, [see links below re 9/11 being a ZOG false flag] and then like, blamed it on, … Apparently we had to invade Iraq for some reason because an Israeli think tank commissioned by Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1990s, transplanted itself into America, called itself the Project of the New American Century [PNAC]. And then Richard Perle, this dual citizen, ends up saying:

 

“Hey, this idea that we had in this Israeli think tank about invading Iraq in the mid-90s, we’re going to like, dress it up in neocon language and then try and sell it to conservatives in America in 1999.”

 

And then he gets put into the Bush administration and then the jews do the fake 9/11. And then even the official story is that there was Saudi Arabian terrorists. What the hell does that have to do with Iraq?

 

 

But that really pissed everybody off. And then boom, da, da boom! Apparently Saddam Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction and he’s friends with Al Qaeda or something. And then the CIA literally said to the Bush administration:

 

“Well, that’s bullshit! Like, our intelligence doesn’t say that.”

 

And so they created a whole sub-dimension of the government called the Office of Special Plans run by the Zionists and jews in the Bush administration to create all this fake intelligence as a pretext to invade Iraq. We invade Iraq:

 

“Oh, there’s no Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But Israel’s plan from the mid-90s to invade Iraq gets achieved.

 

So this is the jewish playbook. Fake terrorism is a jewish playbook. And you know that basically was used as a pretext to destroy, to basically bring in all these new laws that facilitated mass surveillance and anti-terrorism legislation that is now being used against nationalists and all the rest of it. And they’re doing it again. The jewish playbook of fake terrorism where you know, they burn their own synagogue and then the solution to your synagogue getting firebombed isn’t a task force against political firebombings or religious firebombings or something. That would actually solve the apparent issue that was created. But we haven’t even figured out who did the firebombing. I don’t think we ever will because I think the Counter Terrorism police know that the jews did it to themselves. But apparently the solution is to ban masks at public demonstrations and to prevent people from doing rallies within 150 meters of religious buildings, which by the way, there’s churches all through the centre of Melbourne.

 

So that means that like major landmarks in Melbourne, like I think Flinders Street Station, we’ve done rallies before over the years. I remember watching a video of you, Blair, from I think Tom might have been there too. This is like from like eight or nine years ago you guys did a rally at Flinders Street Station. And obviously we did the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally earlier this year, you know, at Flinders Street Station or partially at Flinders Street Station. So that’s a very significant landmark in Melbourne, right across from Fed Square. But it’s within 150 meters of a church. So now you can’t do a demonstration there? Oh well, not now. But when these laws inevitably get passed. What the hell does that have to do with firebombing? Firebombing is already illegal. Why can’t you just prosecute the firebombing?

 

But what this shows is that what jews are afraid of isn’t actually terrorism, but they’re afraid of his criticism! You know, every time jews do a fake terror attack, all the laws that they get passed and the agenda that gets passed has nothing to do with the original thing. It’s just an excuse to violate your rights and to direct the government into doing things that the jews already wanted to do prior to the alleged act. And we’ve seen now as well, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think jews are afraid of criticism?

 

Joel Davis: Well, they’re afraid of criticism because they’ve committed crimes on like a societal scale. They subverted this country. They have incredible power, way more power than they should have as 0.4% of the population.

 

And also they use that power to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Israel’s got nothing to do with Australia. Why does Peter Dutton do press conferences with the Australian flag and the Israeli flag behind him? Why? Why is Israel even an issue in Australian politics? It’s on the other side of the fucking world! What relevance does it have to us? Nothing! The relevance it has is that jews control Australia. Jews control Australian politics. Like what the Jacinta Allan, the Premier of Victoria, said in a press conference is:

 

“This is what we’re going to do for the jews.”

 

And then outlined a whole series of laws that they’re going to pass. She literally said:

 

“This is for the jews!”

 

That’s crazy! They’re 0.4% of the population. Why do they just have the major parties? Because the Liberals love the jews even more than Labor. Why are they falling over themselves to prove how much they love the jews and prostrate themselves before them and say:

 

“We’re doing as much as we can to pass as many laws to make it impossible for the people you don’t like!”

 

Which isn’t just us. They’re coming after us to try to destroy our ability to protest, but they’re also going after the pro-Palestine Left. They want to shut down any kind of political activity that jews don’t like. And this is somehow relevant because if people do political activity that’s critical of jews, someone might want to go and firebomb a synagogue or something. And so like, you can’t just have a law against firebombing. You have to completely control how people think and how people act so just ban all criticism of jews from society entirely. I mean, it’s ridiculous! It’s tyrannical!

 

But nevertheless, what the government is showing is that to them, jewish feelings matter more than our freedoms or any kind of modicum of fairness. I mean, there was a church in Geelong that was burnt down a few weeks ago. Where’s the anti-Christian task force? There was a priest stabbed in Sydney earlier this year in the middle of a church service by a Muslim terrorist. You know, like it’s only the jews that get these special protections.

 

[16:47]

 

Blair Cottrell: Not just interject for a moment to draw attention to Tom Sewell’s new moustache. Looking great, mate! Kind of reminiscent of Mosley or something. What made you go with the stash?

 

Thomas Sewell: Hello, can you hear me?

 

Blair Cottrell: Loud and clear.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is the first stream that I’ve done for the Joel, … Sorry, let me just mute all my shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: … For a few weeks, man! What’s happening?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I needed some time to process, you know, digest. There’s a lot going on in the world, obviously. But, yeah, I got a new cam and a new mic, so hopefully I’m coming through nice and clear. The MO was just “Movember” for last month, and I decided to keep it because my dad had a MO when I was born. So I figured I’ll keep it until the next one’s born. I got a baby on the way, so could be anytime soon. I won’t say exactly how soon, but very soon.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, congratulations, man! It’s exciting stuff! Lots of boys having babies in the community throughout Australia, I’ve noticed. Lots of new families being started. Some guys quite young, too. They’re getting started young. They’re like 22 years old. Punching our kids already, which is awesome to see. I think it’s better off having kids when you’re younger. They’re bound to be healthier when you’re younger. What do you guys think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I do regret in some ways not starting younger. And the main reason for that is. Yeah, it’s the first six months especially is really hard, and it takes up a lot of your time. It all works out, I think, anyway. At the end of the day, you either have kids early and then you develop that part of your life while you’re young. And then when you’re older, you can develop deeper parts of your understanding philosophy. You have more time to yourself.

 

I mean, I know a lot of Boomers and a lot of that generation, once their kids grow up, they kind of just go on holiday. But I think what you’re meant to do is leave some sort of intellectual legacy. You’re meant to do something worthwhile. A lot of people just, it’s sort of career or holiday. They don’t really think about anything more than that.

 

But the other way of doing it, rather than having kids and then developing that stuff later, is you develop in your 20s and 30s, your world view and your philosophy, your personal constitution, and then you have kids later, in which case you’re going to then struggle to have time to continue to develop, but hopefully you’ve laid enough of a foundation. So I think it balances out. But I would have preferred to have been changing nappies and going through screaming babies in my early 20s than my early 30s. So I sympathize with those in their 40s that are doing it. I can certainly think of better things to be doing in my 40s than dealing with screaming babies. Because you just want peace and quiet.

 

As a man, I think the most important thing for developing your personal constitution is peace and quiet. And if you’re just in constant baby family chaos, you can’t really develop like your drive, your mission, your focus. You kind of just caught up in the feminine chaos of the babies. So it makes me think a lot about our ancestors and our ancestral culture. A lot of ancient Germanic and Celtic cultures. They didn’t! The father didn’t really have much of a this is what I’ve read. I don’t know if this is fact, but what I’ve read is that the fathers didn’t have much input until the sons turned 10 and there was sort of a transfer of ownership. Men sort of stayed out of the mums and bubs club, so to speak, and the toddlers and all that. Obviously you’re still there, you’re still present, but you know, there’s a water fight usually. So yeah, not until a boy’s around 10 years old is there that one on one time consistently.

 

Blair Cottrell: I could imagine you would feel once you’ve had a child even more of a drive to make a difference and to do something that makes you useful. Do you find that’s a sensation you’ve experienced after having a kid?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! It’s what ties us to the infinite.

 

So I believe that our children are our afterlife and that we heal this world by making better humans. I think that’s the primary point of what we’re doing. We make better humans. We’re in this mess because of shit humans. We can talk about the jews, we can talk about the Africans, we can talk about all these horrible circumstances, economic pressures. But all of this, in my opinion, is secondary to the quality of humans we’re producing. And if we produce better quality humans in terms of environment, stock, that software, you know what operating system, what personal constitution are you plugging into them? How are you explaining the world to them? And how are you helping them grow and adapt and overcome this dystopian society that we live in?

 

So to me that’s absolutely crucial and it’s extremely motivating because. Yeah, it’s like when you have kids, then you’re trying to create a better world for them, not just like your motivation is now rooted to the centre.

 

[22:01]

 

Blair Cottrell: And why wouldn’t you make better quality versions of yourself if you could? Why wouldn’t you make copies of yourself? I mean, our own lives in the span of all existence, eternity, are absurdly short. Our lives are like a blip on the screen. And we are here now because our parents, their parents, all made copies of themselves. We are just copies of our forefathers, forebearers. So I’ve always believed the same thing too. Like, what is a greater purpose than trying to breed a higher humanity? At the end of the day, that’s the only real meaning of life that in this physical realm we can understand to be true and worth pursuing.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So anyway, onto the news stories. I think I’ll just play this clip, actually. I’ll get you guys to react. I know a lot of people have probably seen it, but this is the Premiere of Victoria, Jacinta Allan announcing these new laws that they want to pass.

 

Jacinta Allan: Today, the government of Victoria renews its promise to jews and to everyone of every background. Whoever you are, whoever you pray to, you deserve to be safe and welcome here in this state. Today too, we support that promise with strong action, strong action to fight hate and help Victorians heal! Action that I will now outline. We will be setting a standard, a standard that we do not tolerate anti-semitism. We do not tolerate anti-semitism! Just as we do not tolerate any form of hate, racism or discrimination against a jew, a Muslim, a Sikh, a Hindu, a Chinese Victorian, or against a woman, against a gay, lesbian or trans person. It’s all despicable! All racism is wrong! All racism is evil! It’s hateful, it’s corrosive. And anti-semitism is racism! And there are too many, there are too many who want to qualify anti-semitism or make excuses for it. And I want to make it absolutely clear that I never will!

 

We’ve also had enough of the protests that have caused division and disruption in our streets. Now, peaceful protests can and must be protected in this state. Protests that harm others cannot!

 

Firstly, we will ban the flags and symbols of listed terrorist organisations in public. That includes Hamas, Hezbollah and several other groups, including White national extremists and radical, racist, violent extremist Right-wing groups. We will also ban the use of face masks and balaclavas at protests. We know they are being used to conceal identities, shield agitators from crowd control measures, like capsicum spray. Well, face masks aren’t a free pass to break the law. And there should be no place to hide in this state if you’re a racist stirring up hate on the streets.

 

And we’re also going to ban the use of glue, rope, chains, locks and other dangerous attachment devices that protesters use to cause maximum disruption and also endanger others. There was an incident that occurred, an incident that was both rightly condemned, but also an incident that became the Genesis of the work that we have released on introducing stronger anti-vilification laws to the Victorian Parliament. But we know it’s rearing its head again and we will act. We will legislate to protect the right for people to gather and pray free from fear, free from harassment and free from intimidation from, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, she only mentions enemies of the jewish community. Like apparently anti-fascist violence is fine. One of the boys had his car firebombed about a year ago around Christmas, a year ago. That was Leftist extremism. But apparently that’s not a problem because they don’t cause any issue for the jewish community, they only target the enemies of jews! An important point, I think.

 

Joel Davis: No, of course! Also you notice there, she didn’t mention in these list of protected groups Whites or any religions that Whites practice in any serious number when she was mentioning religions. So it’s typical, but it’s nevertheless exposing what we say is true, it’s revealing, the system is showing its face that, yeah, as you just said quite accurately, the number one protected community is the jews. No one is allowed to criticise them.

 

And then the number two protected communities are basically everyone who isn’t White. And yeah, the banning face masks thing, that will be interesting. Obviously we use them at demonstrations, but we also get criticised a lot for using them. So now we’re just going to have to, probably when they pass these laws in Victoria, we’re going to have to do demonstrations without face masks.

 

Blair Cottrell: I gotta say this, you guys could look cooler without the masks. I mean, you’re good looking boys. This could be a beautiful blessing in disguise.

 

[27:14]

 

Joel Davis: We’ve had internal debates about it. Like a lot of us want to take the masks off. And I think it will make us look more human to the public.

 

So yeah, it could backfire. Like the jews have banned the Roman salute, they’ve banned the masks and everyone says:

 

“Oh I like what you guys do, but the balaclavas and the Roman salutes that not going to appeal to normies.”

 

Well, the jews are forcing us to have normie appeal! So if this is how they’re going to play it, I guess we’re going to have to play it by these rules. You know, it is what it is. It’ll be interesting to see if it ends up backfiring on the jews and they just end up making us more popular with the public.

 

So I think also the jews are making themselves less popular with the public because they’re making this very explicit, like for a very long time, when you start talking about the jews in Australia, people are like:

 

“What are you like? This is crazy talk!”

 

And also it’s very abstract. You’re talking about the banking system or international finance or things happening in America, things happening in the Middle East, things happening historically in Europe, doesn’t feel very real and important to average everyday Australians and their average everyday lives. But this is very explicit. This is the jews coming after your freedoms in Australia in 2024. This is the jews attacking you! Flexing on you!

 

And so now the jewish problem isn’t just some abstract problem. It isn’t just some thing that fringe people talk about. Now. This is actually something that everyday Australians have to be confronted with, which is that they live in a jewish dominated society. And why does 0.4% of the population get to order the government around? Why does the government, why are the major parties falling all over themselves to grovel to this group? They’re not a significant voter base. There’s barely any jewish voters.

 

So the only reason that they could be groveling to them is because they have money and power! It’s the only reason! They have a lot of it! And that should concern you that your government is beholden to a tiny ethnic group with incredible money and power that can essentially, according to the whims of its hysteria, trash your rights!

 

But what’s interesting is that I’m seeing a lot of criticism for these new laws from the far-Left. And also maybe I don’t mind that Antifa’s not allowed to wear masks anymore. You know, they also going to bring in anti-doxing laws in Australia, which the jews pushed for because some jews got doxed by pro-Palestinian activists or whatever.

 

So they’re going to ban doxing, they’re going to ban face masks. What’s Antifa going to do now? Like their whole strategy is kind of fucking! Like they can’t go, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Disguises aren’t banned. You just wear disguises. As long as it’s not like a face covering.

 

Joel Davis: Well, what kind of disguise can you wear that isn’t a face covering?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s like stockings that change your face, but they’re not really a mask or you could wear. And they don’t even look like you’re wearing a mask.

 

Joel Davis: I think the law might still cover that. I mean, we don’t know the exact legislation right now, but I would anticipate they wouldn’t leave any of those easy loopholes like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: You never know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I guess we’ll see. But I think, it’s interesting, Antifa’s gonna have to take the masks off. They can’t dox people anymore. Now you’re gonna be able to start, you’re gonna be able to sue the Left. If they dox you for being a White nationalist or something and try and get you fired from your job, you can go after them now. Media too. So that’s interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one on the Right seems to sue anyone. Well, there’s been a couple of, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, they should we need to try and make use of these laws and because doxing is one of the main weapons the enemy uses to keep people scared, to speak out or even to maintain anonymous accounts or whatever.

 

So there’s been plenty of people over the years that I know of that have been advocates for our way of thinking to some level or degree that have been doxed and they’ve been taken out, wiped off the Internet or had their careers ruined or their lives ruined in one way, shape or form. So that’s interesting. But that’s a little bit, that’s a bit of a separate issue.

 

But the point is that the rules are changing. Yeah, like I’m annoyed at the rules changing, but it isn’t actually the worst set of rule changes. Like we can adapt to these rule changes. It’s not going to stop us.

 

So you know it, all they’re doing is showing their hand. But they’re not really getting a huge win out of this. Like it seems to me to be a misstep where they’re pissing everyone off. I’ve seen the Left is pissed off! Libertarians are pissed off!

 

A lot of people that are kind of more pro-Israel or whatever that are on the conservative side, they’re really struggling to defend this. You know, they look kind of silly at this point because now it’s not just about being pro-Palestine or it’s not just about being pro-this group or that group now. It’s like:

 

“Well, our freedoms!”

 

I thought the whole point of being allied with Israel is that they’re a liberal democracy and the Judeo-Christian values and our rights and freedoms and all this bullshit! Well, they’re just showing that’s all nonsense and doesn’t mean anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you actually think that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I never thought that, but I’m talking about what conservatives think. I’m saying like the narratives are kind of collapsing to defend the jews from a lot of corners ideologically and they’re losing a lot of support from all corners. You know, when I’ve been making anti, … I’ll go and leave comments on Twitter that’ll be calling out the jews, but they’ll be some anti-Israel comment. And then I see all the likes are all Leftists. Like a lot of Leftists are genuinely like anti-semitic at this point. They aren’t just anti-Israel. Like, I don’t know, The Times are changing. The jews don’t have a lot of friends and they’re rapidly destroying their friendships in a lot of corners. And they’ve just got all this power they’re holding on. They’re kind of ham fisting through the power and influence that they have on the basis of their finances and their elite institutional power. But they’re not doing it very good of selling it. Their optics is terrible, their public relations is terrible!

 

So it’s a perfect environment for us to spread our message against them. So I invite them to make missteps like this to be honest, I’m not. I actually think it’s in a certain way, like it’s a bad thing that they’re doing. Obviously we don’t want these laws, but in a certain way I invite them to do things like this because it’s only proving our point and strengthening our position politically in a certain way.

 

What do you think about that Tom? Do you agree or disagree?

 

[33:31]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll let Blair go first.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was just thinking maybe in the long run it will create strong sense of dissatisfaction, disloyalty in the general community, or maybe they can downgrade the quality of the people so much that kind of fear Police State will be enough to administer them long term. I just think like in the immediate future having laws against anti-semitism which, it’s quite a vague basis for any set of laws, which leads to the police kicking your door down because of some comment you made on the Internet that’s offensive, racially offensive, whatever, probably isn’t a good thing in the short term.

 

Joel Davis: The anti-vilification laws are concerning. Those are different laws than these ones. But yeah, those are the more concerning ones. Those were going to have to fight hard in the courts.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah it doesn’t feel like there are enough people with the right sort of stuff and legal prowess to actually put up a good fight. But I could be wrong. The Clive Palmers out there might have a building full of lawyers that may be useful for that purpose.

 

But it’s probably about time some people who still believe in protecting Australia dedicate some resources to defending the rights of Australians. I don’t have any power. I’m just sitting down here in the suburbs trying to run my business and doing my best to pay my taxes. I’m not the sort of person that knows lots of lawyers and that has a lot of influence in this field. But I don’t know, hopefully people out there get the message sooner or later.

 

And I’m not seeing any great effort right now in the courts to actually establish, you know, boundaries, freedom of expression for Australians to challenge this legislation that is used to justify hate speech crime and stuff like that. But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this kind of stuff is just hushed up and I don’t know about it. I’m just saying that I think in the short term all these things can be bad.

 

However, I understand what you’re saying. It’s clear overreach. And it lends to the criticism or observations that we’ve already made and we’re trying to make other people aware of that the jewish people do have a great deal of power in our country. Undue power! How did they get it? Who’s allowing them to have it? And how do we take back power for ourselves and establish a destiny, a future existence for ourselves as Australians. Because right now we don’t seem to have one.

 

Joel Davis: No, exactly! But what you were saying though, there was a lot of coalescence of support around Jacob [Hersant] and his court battles and that’s going up the courts. We don’t expect the lower courts to strike down laws and rule in our favour, but we do expect to have a strong case going up to the Supreme Court and then particularly in the High Court. And the same thing with this anti-vilification legislation. What is key is that the first people that get charged with this stuff, which will probably be our guys in a lot of these situations because they’re going to come for us with these laws, is riding it all the way up to the High Court. And for that we need community support from the nationalist community in general. But not just that, we need to go out beyond that and get libertarians and other adjacent factions that care about defending these rights.

 

Blair Cottrell: Here’s the thought. How long will White Australian cops willingly enforce these laws? Is there always going to be people who are willing to trade the future of their country for a meagre wage? Or eventually are most cops going to fall off and be replaced with Indians, Chinese and so forth?

 

Joel Davis: That’s already happening, isn’t it, because of Covid? I mean a lot of the all the good cops left during Covid and now they’re bringing in foreigners as police. And they’re not just like immigrants, they’re literally recruiting from foreign countries.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re going to have a significant physical advantage over the police force if it ends up being completely Indian, for example. And so it’s like that’ll be interesting times, that’ll be sporty times.

 

Joel Davis: No, I would definitely like a situation where NSN’s on the streets and we swell up. We’ve got like some better than like bigger numbers and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re the police now!

 

Joel Davis: These cops show up and it’s on. That’d be a funny interaction, if and when it happens. What a juxtaposition.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll make more people support us. More White Australian support us. When they see that it’s Indian cops versus the White lads that have to be mask off and maybe have to carry Australian flags and all the other sort of optics cuckery we’re forced into by the State, I think that’s just going to Garner more and more public support. So in a strange kind of accelerationist or anti-accelerationist way, the government is strengthening our position in the eyes of the public. They’re doing all these things in hopes that we give up, but we’re actually not going to give up. We’ve picked this strategy because it’s the most effective at creating that juxtapositional, that shock and awe strategy to wake the public up into action. And over time we’re going to become more and more legitimate. But it’s very hard to create legitimacy when no one puts up any opposition. And if they do put up opposition, it’s so tame that it doesn’t even get any attention.

 

[39:01]

 

So you have to get the people’s attention first. I’m not saying you get attention and then you start mellowing out your message. You maintain a strong message and everyone knows what you’re about. And most people have a decent memory. Even if they get confused by the current thing every two weeks, they still have a decent memory as to:

 

“Well, those are the racists!”

 

And we’re normalizing racism, we’re normalizing White nationalism and White people are overall getting to the point where they’re just upset with how the state of the country is.

 

And then they’re about to have Christmas and they want to just relax and wind down and celebrate. And it’s a spiritual and it’s a cultural time of year for White people and they turn on the news and it’s just jews complaining that there’s not enough laws against people that hate them.

 

And as a White person, you’re watching that and you’re just like:

 

“When are these jews going to shut up? Are they ever going to be happy?”

 

And then you hear that more money is going to them and we’re in a cost of living crisis. And if you’ve been paying attention, you know that they already get hundreds of millions of dollars a year for their so-called “security”, which they funnel into their fake security companies that they launder money back into the synagogue and probably do all sorts of dubious things with it once they’ve got it there.

 

And on top of that it goes into CSG [Community Security Group] here in Victoria, which is a Mossad front group which is funded by the Australian taxpayer and the Victorian taxpayer. So on top of that, the way that the politicians are handling it is the worst possible way to handle it. I guess they’re just not equipped with any sort of nuance. But I personally am sick, and I say this almost every stream with you guys when you put a politician up like the video up. And my initial instinct or reaction was I feel like I’m in primary school! Like listening to this Jacinta Allan:

 

“We do not do anti-semitism!”

 

[Blair putting in some eye drops] What’s going on there? Clear us. You’re right, Blair? We’re back.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes. My eyes get a bit dry. But while I’m interjecting, don’t you agree though that it’s like the jewish version of rioting. I said this to Joel the other day. The jewish response to the synagogue fire is like the jewish version of a riot. It’s not physical. It’s like complaining:

 

“Give us money, give us rights, give us more laws!”

 

Joel Davis: Because they’re a feminine race, passive aggressive response.

 

Blair Cottrell: If the government could learn, see the way the Assyrians reacted to a terror attack against Bishop Murray, the Christian Assyrians they physically rioted. And the government’s response to that was:

 

“No tolerance!”

 

They arrested the Christians and made a strong effort to demonstrate themselves, you know, controlling the situation, containing the situation:

 

“This riot’s not acceptable!”

 

Why doesn’t the government take the same position towards the jewish version of rioting, which is just, as I said, kvetching.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they’re all just a bunch of primary school teachers. These politicians aren’t leaders, they’re just primary school teachers. And they just lecture the public the way a primary school teacher lectures a small child. Like:

 

“We do not do anti-semitism, we do not do anti-semitism!”

 

I mean, who are they talking to?

 

And then the other thing that I noticed was the it’s a little bit of a will to power, to be honest, to give them a bit of fairness. Not that they deserve it, but they haven’t passed these laws yet. But they always speak as if they’ve already passed them or that they’re going to pass.

 

So they’re saying:

 

“We’re going to, …”

 

Well, that’s technically not correct. Not to sound like a conservative, but you’re going to “try to change the law”. That’s what they’re planning on doing. You’re going to try. What the accurate statement would be is:

 

“We’re going to try to change the law to strengthen these religious vilification laws.”

 

But they didn’t say that, they said:

 

“We’re going to change the law.”

 

So although it’s got a bit of a will to power and there’s a bit of strength to that, it’s the only strength they really portray is when jews are under attack. All of a sudden the government are very strong. But the problem is that that might work on some people, but the average Joe wants to at least pretend that we live in a democracy. And when that is no longer the tone at which they’re being spoken to by their leaders, they’re not going to be looking for Democratic or liberal means to counter the way that the centre Left is speaking to them. They’re going to be looking for a slightly more authoritarian tone amongst the centre Right, which I guess goes into our next point, doesn’t it Joel?

 

The self implosion of One Nation. [chuckling] Where the centre is going now is in two places. You know, the Left are just doubling down and the Right doesn’t know what to do and doesn’t have any representation within The Liberal Party or Labor Party or One Nation for that matter. And they’re absolutely begging now for a semi-authoritarian centre Right, that has that same kind of tone. Because there has to be a balancing. There has to be this harmony, for politics to survive as a democracy, there has to be equal weights on either side of the centre. And otherwise it keeps tipping one way until the Left take total state power and just tell you what’s going on. They don’t even consult.

 

[44:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: But we talked about on the show last.

 

Thomas Sewell: Do you want to move on to the next subject or was there more?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll bring it in. But I’m just going to reiterate what we were talking about last week. I don’t know if I use the term “Bitchocracy”. It’s like, whoever bitches the hardest rules. But I use the term like that. And I was describing how like Anthony Albanese, when he gave your statements last week, he was like:

 

“Jews need to feel safe!”

 

And I was like, politicians didn’t used to talk like this, even back in the 2000s, where they talk about “feelings” like it’s a total like, feminisation of the language. Like you said, when you use the analogy of the primary school, that’s basically the level that public discourse is at now.

 

But it’s obviously very effective because when you move the discussion into feelings, then you don’t actually need to like, back it up with any kind of fairness or facts or whatever. It’s just like, I think I made the analogy on Twitter. Like, our relationship with the jews is like a shitty marriage where nothing you do is ever good enough and nothing they do you can never like, bring up. Otherwise you’re mean and you’re making them feel horrible and so on and so that’s what the jews want. They want to classify all criticism of their behaviour as “anti-semitism”. No criticism of jewish behaviour is tolerated, full stop, end of discussion!

 

But at the same time, they want to then dictate policy. They want to basically run society. How can you be in charge but then at the same time also demand zero criticism? And then play the victim, like:

 

“Oh, like, I can’t believe you would say that. That’s just like another ‘Holocaust’!”

 

You know, it’s ridiculous! But that’s literally the situation that we’re in, and that’s fundamentally unstable. Like, yeah, they’re trying to brute force it, but ultimately you need to rule with carrots and sticks.

 

And at the moment it’s all stick and no carrot. And jews don’t know how to rule. Just it’s like having a single mom. Single moms don’t know how to raise young boys because they don’t understand how to, they don’t have that innate ability basically to know when to basically go hard and when to go soft. If you are just constantly, when you’re raising a child, I mean, I’m not a father, but this is obviously true. If you’re just constantly super strict and just like being like:

 

“Don’t do this, don’t do that!”

 

And constantly like bitching and moaning and everything that they do, they’re not going to take any of it that seriously because it’s no matter what they do, you’re just reacting in the same way. And it’s really more, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Dogs are the same. If you keep giving dogs incessant stupid commands, they stop listening to anything.

 

Joel Davis: Frivolous. They don’t take you seriously.

 

If you want to instil fear in a population, you wait until you’re very upset about something. You have your red lines and then you get really angry! But otherwise you’re chill. And that’s how you, that’s how people respect your rules. Because they know, like, okay, those are the red lines, they’re very clear.

 

But this is the complete opposite. In our society today, all the lines are ambiguous. All these new laws that they’re bringing in, they have all these ambiguous definitions. There’s all these double standards and triple standards based upon feelings:

 

“Well, if this group does it, it makes this group of people feel upset and they’re victims for this reason. And so we have to care about this, but when the roles are reversed or like, …”

 

It’s just retarded! So there’s no legitimacy or coherence to any of this. All they’re going to do is push people into more sympathy to our position when we call it out.

 

But I will say:

 

Secondarily, the main reason why the Left is winning and the conservatives are losing in general., … The jewish issue is different. On the jewish issue, the conservatives are even deeper up the arsehole of the jews than the Left, frankly. The jews completely just own the conservative movement. It’s grotesque! But on every other issue, on these issues of free speech and political correctness and wokeness and anti-White double standards and so on the conservative attitude is always, … Because in politics you got a Left-wing position, a Right-wing position, and everything that happens is centrism. You never get what the far-Left and the far-Right want, never actually happens. Within a democracy, everything that happens is always, is always basically at the centre, in perpetuity.

 

Now what Left-wingers do is they run away from the centre towards the most radical Left-wing position they can possibly go for. And what that does is it then stretches the Overton Window and then the centre then shifts towards the Left. What Right-wingers do is go, hey, or conservatives, I should say is:

 

“Oh, hey, the centre always wins. So let’s go and jump in the centre and occupy the centre and be like, we’re the reasonable people in the centre. We’re not like these fringe lunatics. And then we’ll win because the centre always wins.”

 

[49:42]

 

But what they do by jumping in the centre is they then push the centre away from them, in between them and wherever the Left is. And so when you chase the centre, you’re constantly chasing the centre and you’ll never grab it because you’re constantly pushing it away from yourself while you chase after it. You have to run away from the centre to drag it in your direction. That’s the basic mechanics of a liberal democracy.

 

And this is why they always lose. Even if they win, conservatives win most elections. Like Liberal Party was just in power for like a decade. There was a brief period where you had like Rudd and Gillard for a few years. Then you had Howard in charge for ages. If you go through Australian history, the conservatives pretty much are always in power. The Left barely gets power. But when the Left gets power, they completely change the entire country, initiate all these new reforms, and then the next conservatives are getting in, basically have the same policies and just like entrench them.

 

So even though the Right wins elections, the Left always wins on the issues, all the big issues. Unless it’s the jews. Then when it comes to the jews, then that goes out the window. Right?

 

But I want to bring the reason why I articulate that because I want to bring up this story. So we talked about Parminder Singh on the show last week, who is a Sikh guy who can’t speak English properly. Yeah, he speaks with this broken English. And he’s being run for the Upper House in the upcoming Western Australian election by One Nation. And a Twitter account popped up a few days ago just after I wrote my opinion piece in The Noticer, which by the way, go check it out. It’s called One Nation Goes Full Retard. [https://www.noticer.news/one-nation-goes-full-retard/] I articulated basically the state of things with the Parminder Singh issue earlier in the week, but now all this new stuff has come to light.

 

 

So this page dropped called Parminder Singh One Nation Exposed. This guy says he’s a disgruntled former One Nation candidate and member with direct information over the coming days on Rod Caddies, who is the leader of One Nation in Western Australia and Parminder Singh.

 

Now, what he exposed was this. Well, one of the things he exposed. So Parminder Singh has a company called Punjabi Properties, and you can see on the back of these shirts, which are official One Nation merchandise. Punjabi Properties is displayed all across the back of these shirts. So, like what? One Nation is now sponsored by Punjabi Properties? This is all happening while Pauline Hanson is posting about how we’ve got to end foreign ownership and immigration is too high and all this kind of stuff. Yes, he’s posting here about how Rod Caddies is blocking everyone. He blocked me. He’s blocking all of everyone who’s asking questions. He’s not going to take accountability for his actions.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who is Rod Caddies?

 

Joel Davis: The guy who runs One Nation in Western Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: He put up a video. I think maybe he put up the video actually, after we did it on the show last week. I’ll pull up that video soon. And in that video, he basically wheeled this Parminder guy out to explain that he agreed. No, he agrees with all of Pauline Hanson’s policies, even though we’ve got him on record saying the exact opposite, even as like earlier this year on his Facebook account.

 

And also he ran for office. When he ran for office in local government, I believe Canberra, which level of government it was. When he ran without the One Nation endorsement, one of his policies was “repopulating rural areas with immigrants”. His policy was to bring immigrants into country towns to help build up their population. That doesn’t sound like anti-immigration to me. It sounds like the exact opposite. And he actually reiterated that statement on his Facebook account in his customary tortured, broken English with terrible grammar. It barely makes sense, but you could at least get that’s what he was saying. He also defended the student visa thing, saying:

 

“Oh, well, if we don’t bring students in on student visas, how are universities going to make money?”

 

And when he was talking to What’s News on a video that we watched in the show last week on a phone interview, he was like:

 

“Oh, Indian immigrants are good because they bring money into Australia.”

 

And he even made the point that:

 

“Oh, well, White Australians they don’t want to work hard enough. They don’t want to work on weekends, they don’t want to work 80 to 100 hour weeks. They expect to be paid over $30 an hour.”

 

And this is why they, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Need to give this perspective. He actually did say that? He said he thinks Australians are lazy because they won’t work 100 hours a week. 100 hours a week is over 14 hours per day, every day of the week. That’s the idea of a normal working week for this dude who’s running now Western Australia, in One Nation as a candidate.

 

[54:22]

 

 

Joel Davis: This is like the slave mentality of Indians. This is why the globalists, the big business, the jews, that’s why they want to bring Indians into, or one of the reasons why they want to bring them in. I mean, for some groups like far-Left and the jews, they just want to replace us out of like racial animus towards the White race. But from a business standpoint, one of the reasons they want to bring it in, and from a political standpoint is because they’re a slave race.

 

You know, every time I’ve had a conversation, unfortunately in my life, when I’ve been subjected to Indians through my employment, whenever I’ve had the misfortune of having to make small talk with them, all they talk about is how to make money and how to spend money. That’s literally the substance of everything that they want to talk about every single time! They have purely economic mindset, like, of a slave. They don’t have like a sense of freedom, a sense of like higher spirituality or any of these things that White people have. A sense of high dignity or honour or any of these things. And so that makes them easier to rule.

 

That’s why we could show up to India during the British Empire with, 200,000 Anglos and run their whole continent of like hundreds of millions of slave browns. And we did it for hundreds of years and it was easy, because they’re a pathetic race. And this is why they want to bring them in because they’ll accept shitty conditions and they’ll work long hours and they’ll work three different jobs because all they care about is money and the quality of life in India sucks! It’s still better than back home and this is great for big business, but it’s depressing your wages and destroying your quality of life. And that’s the whole point of voting One Nation right? They’re the one party that’s going to shut down the borders and stop this shit! But now they’re running this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s exactly why the financial sector lobbies the major parties to bring in as many Indians as possible because they’ll live in little Jeet boxes, as Joel calls them. They’ll work for less and they’ll work longer hours. And all big business cares about is people working more for less.

 

Obviously the quality of the goods being produced isn’t going to be as good, but they don’t care about that. People are going to still have to buy it if they’re the only ones offering it.

 

So, yeah, it is all just about replacing the Australian working class with a more manageable slave race. I’ve been saying that for years, actually. What do you think Tom? Do you think they have souls? Do you think Indians have souls?

 

Thomas Sewell: I do.

 

Joel Davis: We’re going deep here.

 

Thomas Sewell: I do. But I believe that souls aren’t really a binary. I believe that they’re a spectrum. So I believe dogs have souls. So of course Indians would have them as well, but they’re just not very large, they’re not very high. Yeah, they’ve got a very mediocre soul. There would be maybe one in a million that would have a very high soul, like a high Aryan soul. White people have huge potential in their soul, but they don’t use it. White people are like the stereotype of the talented person that never uses what they have. White people don’t, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re just capable of so much, … Has Tom cut out or have I cut out?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Tom’s frozen up for me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’ll be back.

 

Joel Davis: His connection was a little bit dodgy before. Hopefully he gets it sorted. While we’re waiting for him to figure that out. Oh, you’re back Tom?

 

Blair Cottrell: I like hearing these takes, though. I like hearing these deep esoterics.

 

Joel Davis: He still seems kind of frozen up there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Am I back? Can you hear me?

 

Joel Davis: You’re back.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re in the first world country of Australia. I pay the top rate for the Internet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently the NBN maintenance crew is Indian now as well.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think One Nation has been taking tips or the NBN have been taking tips from One Nation on their hiring policies. You know, they got the $25 an hour Jeets doing maintenance.

 

Anyway, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Infrastructure will fall apart in our lifetime. I guarantee everyone that.

 

I mean, I have friends in South Africa and they tell me that you may as well live rurally as long as you’re protected. Because in the cities there’s just constant blackouts. There’s just constant infrastructure issues. Yeah. With what Elon Musk is doing with the Starlink, it doesn’t matter whether you’re rural or in the city anymore.

 

So the infrastructure is garbage! I can’t believe how much the Internet drops out. But back on topic, prior to your question about whether Indians have souls or not, just the blatant, it’s like some strange form of corruption I’ve never personally seen., …

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s gone again. That’s really frustrating. He was going to say something good. He was about to say, …

 

Joel Davis: He was cucking. Yeah. It’s annoying.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is a pain in the ass.

 

Joel Davis: Be back.

 

Thomas Sewell: What an absolute pain in the ass.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m gonna drop off. I’ll just make my last point. But the Internet is just intolerable and you guys are all blurry for me. I thought it was your Internet’s playing up. And I was like, sweet, my Internet’s fine. And then I clicked on the stream. I was like:

 

“Oh, it’s actually me!”

 

Joel Davis: I’m gonna blame ZOG.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s just excellent! It’s excellent to see that One Nation. This won’t be forgiven. Especially in WA [West Australia]. It might be forgiven in the rest of the country because Noticer News is not Sky News yet, but one day it will be.

 

Thomas Sewell: But in WA, this is not going to be forgiven. And it’s good to see that it even led to or impacted or pressured the one sitting MP or Senator to actually drop off. I don’t know if that’s been covered on the stream yet, but I saw that recently as well.

 

[1:00:26]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, I was gonna bring that up Yeah. Is he gone again?

 

Blair Cottrell: Seems that way.

 

Joel Davis: The elusive Sewell. Yeah, I think ZOG have taken him out. You’ve taken out our boy. We’re gonna have to ride this one, the two of us.

 

Blair Cottrell: We have to keep marching forward, guys! We have to keep going. There’s going to be casualties.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, yeah, we’ve got to keep moving forward.

 

So I’m going to go through. I’m going to like unpack all the details to fill everybody in on some of the updates to the Parmindergate, if you will, and then we’ll do some analysis.

 

So this flyer came out. So there was a video which I will pull up in a second. And in the video Parminder Singh was Rod Caddie’s, the guy who runs One Nation WA, he got Parminder Singh on and said:

 

“There’s a lot of people online that are spreading all this misinformation saying that Parminder Singh is pro-immigration. And I’ve got him here to say that no, he’s not got those views.”

 

And basically Parminder Singh just more or less said:

 

“I read all the One Nation policies on Pauline Hanson’s website and I agree with the policies.”

 

He didn’t actually like articulate anything specific about him agreeing with those policies or why he agrees with those policies, which kind of gives itself to the accusation that he’s a grifter, basically. That he’s identified One Nation as the biggest party that is stupid enough to give him the nomination.

 

Because if he tried to rock up to the Liberals or whatever and throw around his curry shop money, it wouldn’t go very far. The Liberals are getting that big like jew money coming in from the property developer jews and the banks and all the rest of it. So they wouldn’t be interested. He doesn’t have that kind of high roller money.

 

If he went to the Labor Party. Well, the Labor Party they would run Indians, but they’ll run Indians that can speak English properly, that have been to university. They’re actually a serious professional political outfit to a degree.

 

And so I don’t know how big the Greens are at WA but again, they’re going to run people that actually are ideologically competent. This guy can barely string three sentences together that make any sense. Like he has like a really superficial understanding. He’s probably got like an 80, 80 to 85 IQ. Like he’s not smart, he’s not well educated, he’s not a good speaker. And so anyway, the next option then is One Nation. That’s the fourth biggest party. And he’s obviously bought his way in. There’s a it’s alleged that he made a twenty thousand dollar donation which sounds like nothing. If that’s all it costs to buy your way into One Nation maybe we should try and like do a GoFundMe to like buy the nomination for Blair or something! [chuckling] Because we could crowdfund that from you guys in like two days.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they wouldn’t take it. They’re too concerned about optics to take me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re too concerned about optics to take you. A well spoken White Australian that people actually like that’s actually a nationalist, but they will take some fat hairy Sikh that can barely speak English correctly and can barely articulate what policies he supports.

 

Anyway, he put out this document here. It says down the bottom authorized by Parminder Singh.

 

 

So this is put out on behalf of One Nation from his office and it says here:

 

“We want One Nation not a divided nation.”

 

And the key beliefs:

 

“Key belief one, support for immigrants.”

 

You know, immigrants are great basically:

 

“Key belief two, balanced immigration. One Nation is not anti-immigration but we recognise allowing too many people in too quickly constrained services.”

 

This is a really big watering down of One Nation’s policies from:

 

“Immigration is causing a housing crisis. We need to cut it down to Net Zero.”

 

Like when Pauline first got elected to Parliament she gave a speech saying:

 

“We’re in danger of getting flooded by Asians. We’re losing our culture.”

 

Now look at One Nation. They’re being cucked by some curry shop owner. Apparently as well, it says here:

 

“All the One Nation WA merchandise at events had a logo on the back that said Punjabi Properties. The logo is bigger than the One Nation logo. Ask anyone who attended the event in Mandurah November 9th. And the food at the event was curry supplied by Parminder Singh’s curry company or restaurant.”

 

 

So you go down to the One Nation rally. Look at all these White Boomers. They’re going down to the One Nation rally because you know there’s too many immigrants coming into this country and they want something done about it. And they get given their One Nation shirt with Punjabi Properties on the back and served curry!

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s [chuckling] bad!

 

Joel Davis: And then some fat Sikh gets up there and speaks in broken English and doesn’t even understand the policies of the party that he’s joined. That’s the state of One Nation! That’s the state of One Nation. I mean like it’s bad!

 

Blair Cottrell: Sad!

 

 

Joel Davis: This is levels of cuckservatism previously not thought possible. I mean it’s not even competent cuckservatism. It’s just embarrassing. What I said on my opinion piece was its actually more respectable if they were paid off to run this guy. It was purely a financial decision. If they thought this was a good idea on any metric, that’s actually more embarrassing than just being like shills. In my opinion, that’s how bad this guy is.

 

[1:06:03]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was just going to ask you a question. Do you think they’re foreseeing an increase in the Indian population and they want a piece of that they can see that a lot of that’s going to go towards either Liberal or Labor and the strategy is:

 

“We need a piece of the Indian voting bloc that’s going to be set up in Australia.”

 

Already is being set up in Australia by the other parties. Has it got something to do with that. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: It can’t be for the Indian voting block. They’re not that significant of a voting block. And the reality is, I mean we’ve done, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know man, there’s a lot of Indians in India. How many Indians are in India?

 

Joel Davis: But I’m talking about here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but they’re going to keep coming in. There’s going to be hundreds of thousands every few months. It’s going to end up being millions.

 

Joel Davis: One Nation’s supposed to be stopping them from coming in. Isn’t that the whole, …!

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re not! They must be thinking:

 

“Well they’re going to come anyway, we might capitalise on it anyway.”

 

Joel Davis: The majority of Indians, … They have done the studies. They vote Labor and then Labor are going and making deals saying:

 

“We’re going to bring in shitloads of Indians and we love Indians!”

 

And then Liberals come out and say:

 

“We love Indians just as much as Labor, actually!”

 

And they’re going and making deals with the Indians and so on.

 

So why is One Nation? Is it really think that it’s going to convince the Indian community:

 

“Hey, we’re the anti-immigration party that everyone calls racist and everyone in the party, everyone who votes for us are all like one White bogans.”

 

Or whatever according to the common, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Just trying to make sense of it.

 

Joel Davis: Vote for us instead! Like we’ve done the studies, we’ve gone through them on the show. Like the majority of Australians want immigration cut. They want immigration lowered, and they don’t have anyone to vote for basically except One Nation to do that.

 

So One Nation, if they sell themselves as the anti-immigration party. Well yeah, okay, Indians are coming in but over fucking 70% of voters are White! So selling “keep the Indians out to White voters” and WA has got a higher than 70% White ratio. I think it’s like almost 80% White. So trying to sell an anti-immigration message to White voters, people that actually vote for you, do you think that should be the priority? Not trying to market yourself to the 4% of the population that’s Indian that’s already voting for your political enemies that don’t like your policies anyway. That’s just fucking retarded politics! Like, it’s insane!

 

This is what I was saying before about like conservatives running to the centre to try and occupy the centre, but the centre escapes them. Like One Nation’s job is to run away from the centre and to stretch the discourse out, force the Liberals to justify themselves. Like the Liberals right now, the majority of Liberal voters want immigration cut, but the Liberals are avoiding the issue.

 

One Nation, if they did a proper anti-immigration campaign and sold themselves the true Right-wing party that’s going to shut down the borders, they’d get shitloads of votes that’d be very popular. But no, they want to try and prove how not racist they are by running some fat Indian. And he was the guy, by the way, we talked about on the show when Pauline went to the Sikh temple over in Perth. It was this guy’s Sikh temple. He organised all that. Pauline in that head scarf, turban thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: He must have given him more than 20 grand. It must have been more than 20 grand! He must have given him something else.

 

Joel Davis: I hope so, because it’s embarrassing, man! It’s embarrassing!

 

Blair Cottrell: It seems like he’s bought out the whole party. That’s what it seems like.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In WA at least. And people were saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not Pauline’s fault because it’s the WA wing of the party and they don’t control it.”

 

But it’s like that’s bullshit! She controls it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s her party. She’s ultimately in charge of everything that happens. She should just pull the pin on him. She should just pull the pin on him and say:

 

“Get rid of this guy. What’s he talking shit for about wanting more Indians? We’re against that. People are voting for us because we’re against that. Get rid of this guy!”

 

Why can’t you do that, Pauline? That’s what everyone’s waiting for.

 

Joel Davis: The party’s literally called Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Like her name’s in the name of the party. Like, you know what I mean?

 

Anyway, I’ll pull this video up for everyone’s viewing benefit. This is what I was describing before. This is that Rod Caddies joke who runs WA One Nation. A lot of nationalists have spoken to me privately, by the way, who were involved in Western Australian One Nation and they hate this guy. Like, this guy and others involved have been advocating for moderating and cucking for years. And alienating a lot of the true nationalists in the party over there. Cucking to the Aboriginals, now cucking to the jeets. I mean it’s embarrassing! But anyway, I’ll play this for everyone’s benefit.

 

 

Rod Caddies: Hey guys, just wanted to jump on here and have a chat with Parminder. I mean there’s been a few things put around on social media lately about immigration and how Parminder wants to flood our country with Indians and I know for a fact that’s not true, but I wanted to show you guys and let you have a listen to Parminder for himself and where he stands with One Nation and immigration.

Parminder: So hi everyone. Before I joined the One Nation party, I read the all policies, whatever the Pauline stand for and I fully support the Net Zero the immigration policy. And if some people lucky enough to come here, I request all those people that respect the Australian culture, Australian values and Australian constitution. And the English is my third language. So and I try to make a videos, that’s why it’s a little bit like I think in my own language first, then I speak in English. So that’s why it’s bit slow. So I [word unclear] One Nation policies.

Rod Caddies: So there you have it.

 

[1:11:50]

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! I mean he just said something I’ve always said and it’s something. Hang on one minute, I’ve got music playing and I shouldn’t have music playing, stupid. I’ve always said that you’ve got to be careful when dealing with foreign people because even though they may learn your language and churn out sentences in some form of your language, they’re thinking in their own language and they have words and phrases for things that we don’t even conceptualise often, especially if they come from a more mercantile, ruthless kind of society and culture. So he just basically admitted that in that video. He’s like:

 

“I’m thinking in my own language but then I’m speaking in yours. So what I’m actually thinking, who knows? You’ve just got to trust me guys!”

 

That’s [chuckling] pretty heavy stuff.

 

Joel Davis: The excuse that he used is that he’s incapable of articulating his true beliefs correctly because he can’t speak English properly. How does that qualify you to be a politician in Australia if you’re incapable of articulating yourself correctly in the language that Australians speak? That’s immediately disqualifying, immediately! Like it’s ridiculous!

 

But secondarily what he said there, like the grammar’s horrible, like “I supported the Pauline” and so on, like it’s embarrassing! But as he was describing, he’s like:

 

“I fully support the policies of One Nation.”

 

Now we’ve got all of these statements that he’s made that are contrary to those policies on immigration. So he’s changed his mind. Doesn’t he owe us an explanation for why he changed his mind? Because he’s acting like, as if, it’s not like he’s always had these views. He’s just signed up to this party that has different policies than what he’s advocated before in his public statements and his previous attempts at being an independent politician. So you would owe us an explanation for why you changed your mind and why we can trust you now.

 

But instead, what this was just like, wheel him out, say he agrees, tell everyone to shut up, gaslight everyone, and then just block everyone on Twitter that’s saying the opposite. I mean, absolute PR disaster for One Nation! Good work to all the boys putting pressure on. I tried to do my bit to force this kind of reaction. And then what we saw today, and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! And that video, let me interject quickly, is a direct response to the pressure you guys have been putting on these people. So it goes to show how influential we are as a community. They have to play ball with us because we are the people who vote for One Nation. We used to be anyway, people watching this video, that was supposed to be the Nationalist Party. So good effort for everyone or good effort by everyone putting the pressure on as a result of this stupid decision.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see a Superchat from Ukrainian groiper saying, “Naan Nation”*. That’s pretty funny.

 

[* Naan (Asian flatbread) Naan is a leavened, oven-baked or tawa-fried flatbread, that can also be baked in a tandoor. It is characterised by a light and fluffy texture and golden-brown spots from the baking process. Naan is found in the cuisines of Iran, Central Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Caribbean. Composed of White or wheat flour and combined with a leavening agent, typically yeast, naan dough develops air pockets that contribute to its fluffy and soft texture.]

 

But anyway, so this is the article in The Noticer just dropped just before we went live:

 

“Western Australia’s only One Nation MP suddenly quits the party.”

 

This is Ben Dawkins. He presumably joined the One Nation party to keep the likes of Parminder out of the country. Like that’s the whole point of One Nation. It’s an anti-immigration party.

 

 

https://www.noticer.news/ben-Dawkins-quits-one-nation-western-Australia/

 

Anyway:

 

“He’s been a member for the southwest region since March 2023 and is according to The Noticer, pro-freedom and anti-woke. He formally tended his resignation from Pauline Hanson’s party on Tuesday, saying on Thursday that he made the decision ‘reluctantly’. His resignation comes amid controversy over One Nation selection of Sikh businessman Parminder Singh as the third Upper House candidate in Western Australia due to his support for mass immigration from India.”

 

And this is like the original video. By the way. Go check out this article on the Noticer dot News. It’s the number one article at the moment because he just got put out.

 

And then you can watch this video by What’s News here where he interviews Parminder Singh on the phone and you can hear for yourself of what he said. The quotes here from Mr. Dawkins:

 

“I hold Pauline Hanson in high regard as a courageous advocate for everyday Australians. Indeed, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation should be the party with the guts to say what you’re thinking. As an independent candidate, I will continue to have the courage to speak for those who feel unheard.”

 

Blah, blah, blah. Who’s obviously amicably leaving the party. But the fact that he’s decided to quit right now, I mean, what other reason could it possibly be? Surely he’s quitting because of this. Surely this is the final straw. What do you think Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: All we can do is speculate about that. I’m sure I don’t know the man, I can’t speak to his motivations.

 

[1:16:26]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Someone says here:

 

“Joel, with all due respect, this is like saying that a dog owes us an explanation for chewing issues. He’s a fresh off the boat jeet. There isn’t any explanation. He couldn’t articulate one in English regardless.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, what I was articulating.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t care about his explanation. We want an explanation from Pauline Hanson. What’s going on with the party?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re supposed to represent the Australian people. That’s what we’re waiting for.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like how are you going to keep immigrants out of Australia if you can’t even keep them out of your own party? I mean, it’s pretty basic.

 

But keep the pressure up, all of you on Twitter. Every time Pauline Hanson tweets, Malcolm Roberts tweets, any of these other One Nation accounts from anywhere in the country, get in the replies, post the links to all this stuff, keep the pressure up, keep asking the question and just keep making it a nuisance for them because they need to, as you said, they owe us an explanation. We are nationalism in this country. You need to explain yourself to us!

 

I saw some rumours coming out that the Libertarian Party’s immigration platform is not going to be too crash hot. Then I asked some people that I knew in those circles and they said:

 

“No, actually it’s going to be better than he says.”

 

Or whatever. I said:

 

“You guys have to get your immigration policy together and you need to come out and you need to explain to us nationalists why it’s better than One Nation’s.”

 

And they said:

 

“Yeah, we’re going to do that.”

 

So we’ll see if they cuck or don’t cuck. We’ll cover it live. We’ll break it down. Will they end up bringing out a policy better than one nations? I don’t know. I’m sceptical. They’ve got elements in the party that seem not to care as much about immigration as an issue as others. We will see who wins out. We’ll see when the formal policy comes, comes forward.

 

But you know, One Nation’s in danger here. If the Libertarians put out a good immigration policy that’s better than theirs, they’re going to steal their votes off them and deservedly. So and if the Libertarians don’t put out a good immigration policy, I’m not going to advocate for voting for One Nation while they’re running these jeets. There’s no fucking way, there’s no fucking way! I’m going to be telling all of our audience to not vote. If our vote has to be earned. And at the moment, none of these Jokers are earning it. Like, none of them are taking this issue, even like a quarter of percent seriously compared to what they should be taking it. This is an existential issue. Our nation is being destroyed. And it’s also the number one issue destroying the average Australian’s quality of life. The housing crisis, wage stagnation, et cetera. Immigration is being rammed down the throat of this country by big business interests, big corporate interests, big finance interests, so that they can keep making ridiculous profits while in an economy that’s faltering. We’ve been in a per capita recession every quarter for the last, you know, two years basically. Australia’s fucking! Everything is getting worse on every level and immigration is the reason why.

 

So the average Joe on the street definitely wants the border shut down, definitely wants something done.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about those people who are saying:

 

“No, it’s not immigration, it’s landlords putting up property prices. It’s capitalism, it’s greedy capitalists, that’s what’s destroying Australia!”

 

How do you respond to that? It’s not immigrants, it’s capitalists!

 

Joel Davis: Well, the way that I would respond to that is simple.

 

Number one, these big capitalist lobby groups, like the property developer lobby, the finance lobby, the big corporate industry lobbies, they ask the government, they fund the political campaigns of the major parties and they demand higher immigration. Their public representatives that they pay to come and advocate for their interests want more immigration.

 

So when they say it’s not immigration, it’s the capitalists, it’s like, well the big capitalists are the ones that are deciding that they want the immigration. So you can’t actually divide the two things from one another. This is ridiculous! Like the capitalists are telling us immigration is good for them, so it must be good for them.

 

And if you have a Marxist worldview where you believe that the capitalists make profits under the exploitation of the working class, well everything the capitalists do driven by that profit motive must be to exploit the working class, including the fact that they’re pumping all this money into politics to keep immigration high, against the public will. Because it’s not the Democratic will. We’ve seen the polls, we’ve gone through them on the show every time they do one, every time they do a poll on immigration is wildly unpopular. So liberal and Labor don’t have the immigration policies they do because of what their voters want. They have it because it’s what their donors want. And their donors are the big capitalists. So it’s just a complete non-starter of an argument.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would it be fair to say that shutting down discussion on immigration on the grounds that it’s “racist” is protecting the profits of the capitalists?

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely! 100%! It’s not even in question.

 

Blair Cottrell: That really throws a spanner in the works, doesn’t it? I wonder what came first, the chicken or the egg? Did the capitalists dream up this whole anti-racist movement and use it to usher in this new slave class that’s going to live in smaller spaces, work long hours and for less, like for lower wages? Or have they just kind of adjusted themselves to that culture that already established itself as a result of subversion? I would lean towards the second scenario.

 

[1:22:10]

 

Joel Davis: I think it almost doesn’t really matter! What matters from our standpoint is going to Leftists and saying:

 

“You claim to be against capitalism, yet the social values that you put forward are the social values of the big capitalists.”

 

The big capitalists are fine with gay marriage and they support transgenderism and they support mass immigration and all the rest of it. They support political correctness, they support wokeness.

 

So if they support all of those things, clearly all of those things are compatible with capitalism. Clearly all of those things are beneficial to capitalist power. Otherwise why would they support them? And we can actually explain why they benefit from capitalist power. Because what those things do is they destroy the fabric of the nation, they destroy national loyalty, they destroy patriotism.

 

And that’s why Leftists attacked them. Because Leftists decided after World War II that, well, probably earlier, but they particularly decided this after World War II, that nationalism was their main enemy. Nationalism, National Socialism, fascism, that whole suite of ideas, that’s their main enemy. And that was more important, fighting that was more important to them than advocating for the working class.

 

In fact, a lot of Leftist theorists said:

 

“Well, the White working class betrayed us because they supported National Socialism and fascism. So fuck the White working class! We’re going to replace them with a brown and black working class and a gay working class and so on, that will support communism.”

 

So they made the decision that destroying nationalism was more important than destroying capitalism. And capitalists then looked at the world and said:

 

“You know what? The biggest threat to us actually isn’t communism, its nationalism.”

 

And you can see that in World War II. Because in World War II the Liberal capitalist West allied with the Soviet Union to destroy National Socialist Germany. So clearly they made a decision then that they were more threatened by National Socialism than Communism, otherwise they wouldn’t have allied with one against the other. That’s just a brute fact of history that communists and Leftists cannot argue away. That’s reality.

 

[Capitalism and Communism are both jewish systems so their co-operation, both overtly or covertly, is natural-K]

 

Then they then set upon systematically funding and supporting the destruction of nationalism and anything approximating nationalism in every Western country under their control.

 

So why would capitalists want to do this? Well, nationalism is the greatest threat to an international market system because nationalists, when they come to power and they take over the government, they go and look at what’s happening in international markets and they say:

 

“Well, hey, wait a second, this capitalist over here is making a profit at the expense of my nation. He’s taken jobs to other countries, he’s importing goods from other countries and he’s doing all of these things that are good for him to make extra profits, but they’re actually bad for the strength of my nation. And so I’m going to start creating all these laws that protect local industries, keep wealth and resources in my country to build up the national strength, make sure there’s good jobs for my people.”

 

But international finance, they didn’t want to do that because at the end of the post-war globalisation that we’ve had, they wanted to go and exploit the cheap slave labour in China and other foreign third world countries and then import all that cheap crap into the West and sell it to us. And they took away all the manufacturing jobs.

 

Like back in the 1960s or the 1970s, over 30% of Australia’s economy was manufacturing. We used to make cars, we used to make computers, we used to make everything here. Now it’s only 6% of the economy, we make nothing here. And that’s one of the reasons why people are doing it tough. Because there isn’t good quality jobs for the working class anymore, because they sent all those jobs to foreign countries.

 

And the people that would stop that are nationalists, which is why they attack the White Australia Policy, which is why they attack nationalism, which is why they attack your identity. Because they don’t want White Australians supporting a political leader that’s loyal to them before he’s loyal to big business. All the biggest companies in this country, the top 20 countries, sorry, the top 20 companies in Australia are majority foreign owned. It’s all Wall Street, jewish banking firms and shit that own all of our shit! Like all of our shit has been sold to all these like foreign interests. Our country has been completely sold off. All the jobs have been shipped offshore. We had so much wealth in this country. We were one of the wealthiest countries per capita in the entire world. So much has been shipped overseas to the benefit of large corporate interests at your expense.

 

And if you had leaders that were nationalists like they used to be before World War II in Australia, who put White Australian people first, they wouldn’t have let that happen.

 

So that’s why they had to destroy that ideology to facilitate this. That’s what international finance wanted and that’s why the world that is run by international finance, these big capitalists, attack people like us and our ideas hard rather than the Left. They fear them less than us because we are the true enemy. And the Left is complicit. The Left attacks us harder than it attacks them even though they have the power and we don’t. So their entire worldview is bullshit! They’re complete frauds!

 

Blair Cottrell: What you seem to be saying there is the Left are larping as class communists, like they’re not actually against the bourgeoisie or the rich. They’re actually race communists, like race and race hate, punishing White people is at the centre of all of their politics.

 

[1:27:31]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yes! Yes, they care more. And we see this in their revealed preference. They care more about attacking us than they care about attacking capitalist power. Why is the Left, their number one focus is anti-fascism. Why isn’t anti-capitalism? Why aren’t they going after the enemy in a serious way? Because number one, that’s hard. Because you’re going after the people that are actually powerful! That’s what we do. And we get locked up in jail and we get dragged through courts and horrible things happen to us. People get fired from their jobs. When you go after the real power, real power goes after you!

 

Blair Cottrell: No bank accounts, no monetisation, no Patreon, no YouTube.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The only time the Left do anything that really goes after the power, serious power, is when they go after Israel.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And then they feel some consequences finally, for the first time in their lives.

 

Joel Davis: The only time they feel any consequences. And that also proves the other aspect of what we say, which is that capitalism is jewish! The capitalist elite, a lot of them are fucking jews!

 

And if you look at the history of capitalism, capitalism was developed, the entire logic and structure of capitalism was developed by basically jewish practices subverting medieval European society. We talked about this on the show a few weeks ago. Werner Sombart’s work, the book is called jews and Modern Capitalism. And Werner Sombert wasn’t just any old anti-semite or something. Werner Sombart was the greatest theorist of the German historical School of historical economics in the late 19th and early 20th century. He was a genius! He was a genius!

 

And as he was writing his work, basically trying to articulate the whole history of capitalism, how it came into existence and why, he realised that the jews played such an important role that he had to write a completely separate book just on the jews and their involvement in the development of capitalism. And in that book he describes how in medieval Europe, merchants had a completely different ethos.

 

So if you were a merchant in medieval Europe and you went out into the public square and you started praising your wares and talking about how great the stuff at your shop is and how low your prices are and all this kind of stuff, that was considered immoral. If you tried to get customers off the other shop owners, that was considered immoral. If you charge a different price than the other merchants, if you tried to like sell your stuff extra cheap, that was considered immoral. Everything had a set price. You sell it at that price. You don’t big up your goods. You are a Christian. The people who made it are Christians. Everyone should just trust that the quality is there, that’s that! There’s no Hoodwinking, there’s no marketing, there’s no manipulation that was permitted. There’s basically, it was just a fair, equitable system and it was completely mediated through charitable, good faith Aryan society.

 

Then the jews come in and the jews will come in, they’ll get. Jews had international networks. They they’re an “international clique” as Hitler described. They would be involved, particularly in early colonisation. They were going after the gold mines and the silver mines and stuff over in South America. But they were very involved in these international trade networks also all the trade networks that ran through the Middle East into Europe as well. And they were an international ethnicity, every other ethnic group was in one location. The jews had people everywhere.

 

So the jews could use the fact that they were one international group to build all these relationships with the other jewish merchants all around the world and to facilitate international trade.

 

And then, as a result, they could then import goods and bring them into your community and sell them cheaper than the stuff made in your local community. And they didn’t have laws against that kind of stuff back then or any kind of regulations back then, because it was an honour system.

 

And so they’d come in and they would sell stuff at half the price, and they’d destroy local industries. They’d be haggling people on the street trying to sell stuff. They’d be advertising their goods. This is why the jews took over the media, because the jews were the first people to get into advertising. It was considered immoral to advertise for Aryans. But jews didn’t have any issue with advertising.

 

And so they then got into that industry. And that the advertising industry is the backbone of the printing, you know, print media. Print media makes a lot of money off the advertising on the papers, in the newspaper. So as newspapers were invented in the early 18th century and widely distributed, jews played a leading role in financing a lot of that, because jewish merchants would advertise through those.

 

And then that gave them a lot of control over media and therefore public perception. But jews innovated in these industries, and so they were able to undercut the opposition. That’s why jews are getting kicked out of all these different cities and countries all across Europe all the time, because they would come in with their investment practices and destroy the livelihoods of local industries and local merchants, completely upset the whole apple cart of the local community. And eventually there would be enough public resentment that they’d run them out of the city and demand that they’d be kicked out of the city. And then they go to the next city and they do the same thing and so on. And the process kept repeating.

 

But eventually they were able to become normalised in Europe because they made so many deals with elite political actors and traitors that got in bed with these jewish merchants and were making a quick buck.

 

[1:33:18]

 

And I’m not even talking about usurious lending as well, which is a whole other aspect of this, that eventually jewish mercantile behaviour became normalised. And now it’s considered normal to have advertising. Now it’s considered normal to try and undercut and compete with other firms and try and sell things cheaper and import goods from all over the world.

 

And instead of like buying things from like local producers and you know, we’ve got this completely globalised, marketized, corporatized, consumerized society.

 

Now this all came from originally the impact of the jewish mentality and jewish culture on Aryan Middle Ages Europe. Without that maybe we wouldn’t live in this fucking shitscape. So capitalism is fundamentally and inherently jewish in a certain way. You could argue according to Sombard’s theories, which I think are really compelling, the history that he describes in that book.

 

But then secondarily we can see that jews are very, up to this day. Like I’ve talked about on the show before, how look at the property development industry which is a massive supporter of mass immigration because more immigrants means more demand for property. So they can build more high rise fucking ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] slave high rise apartments and sell them for you 800 grand a pop like in some overcrowded part of like inner city Sydney or Melbourne or something. And a bunch of Asians and pajeets will buy them or want to rent them or whatever. And that’s a great business model for them. It doesn’t do anything for our country, it just clutters our cities, makes traffic worse, depresses wages with cheap labour and so on, but drives up the price of rent and all this kind of stuff. But for them it’s great! They’re making millions, they’re making billions.

 

And the biggest property developer in Australia is Harry Triguboff. The jew. And the jews have always been instrumental in high rise development in this country because before World War II we didn’t allow high rise development in Australia because our culture said if we have all these high rise apartments in the cities, what this is going to encourage people to do is to move in there, move out of their parents home when they’re in their 20s, move into one of these apartments in the city and they’re not going to have children, they’re not going to get married, they’re going to start having frivolous sex, they’re going to start developing this kind of cosmopolitan Left-wing culture, they’re going to become basically soy Jack Reddit libtard types. We don’t want that! That’s happened in Europe and it’s created all these revolutionary communist movements and it’s been a mess in Europe. We don’t want that in Australia.

 

The Australian dream is going to be we’re going to have, everyone is going to have their own quarter acre block and have their own home that you can fit a family in. And they’re going to get married young, they’re going to have children and they’re going to have a dignified existence and you can go and work at the factory before we send the jobs overseas and you can earn enough to be able to support a wife and three kids and so on.

 

And that’s how we’re going to build our society. It’s going to be healthy. The tallest building in town is going to be the Church. Nothing’s going to be bigger than the Church. No high rise development. Everyone’s going to have a backyard, everyone’s going to be out, kids playing outside, healthy, blah blah, blah. That was the great Australian dream. And the jews came in after World War II, started building high rise developments. The first high rise developments were in the jew areas of Sydney and Melbourne, in Bondi, in St Kilda.

 

The places that still to this day are where the jews live. That’s where the first high rise developments were. And they got money from their international jewish finance buddies to finance them because they have the international networks that give them low interest loans to then build their high rise developments. And this is where the money for a lot of these wealthy jewish families that are now controlling our government came from is from setting up shop, basically subverting our society, building these high rise developments, developing these giant corporations that now control our government and are forcing immigrants down our throat. And these have been a lot of the money that’s been behind multiculturalism and so on has come from these developments and they’ve completely subverted Australian society.

 

Now we do have these cosmopolitan communist Leftists that are like they don’t have any children and so on and live in the inner cities and perpetuate this Left-wing ideology, just like it was predicted.

 

And so you can see like the same jewish infection of our society, kind of like what I described in medieval Europe has happened here to create this current problem.

 

But a lot of people don’t know understand this or know about this, but this is just history, this is just how it works. So you know, when we’re talking about the problems with capitalism, it’s not just an abstract idea, we’re talking about fucking jews!

 

So anyway, I went on a bit of a tangent there, but I thought it was important.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you sometimes do that. I tend to try to just let you go. But it was all very good stuff. That’s the thing. It’s a lot to unpack for the average person. But because people can go back and they can re-watch it, they can replay these little segments. I think it’s all really good stuff. I’ve got to jet. I’ve got some responsibilities to see to. But it’s been a great stream so far. You’re gonna stay with it Joel, I suppose, and, …

 

[1:38:26]

 

Joel Davis: No. We’ll end it there.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s okay. We can do some Superchats then. I can stick around for that, I suppose.

 

Joel Davis: All right. There’s not that many. Clever Name said:

 

“Never get to catch you live. The moustache needs a badge and some brutality to go with it. Solid 7 out of 10. Congrats on the little one.”

 

That’s obviously directed towards Tom. And I agree that Tom kind of has a cop physiognomy. Tom does kind of look like a cop in a way. Maybe in a healthy society, he would be a cop.

 

Blair Cottrell: Whoa, Are you talking about Thomas Sewell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Don’t you think he kind of looks like a cop?

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe with a moustache a little bit. But I always thought I could be a good cop if I was living in a society where that was feasible. Obviously, it’s not feasible now, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, seven years, … Cops that wear the aviators and …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you used to have to be a guy like me to be a cop. You have to be as big and as tall as me. They were like the basic physical standards to be a police officer because you had to command respect in the community. You had to be intimidating to a certain degree, but also respectable. So, like, my physiognomy was the one they used to go for. But now there’s all these equality you can’t discriminate, that kind of stuff.

 

So I wouldn’t last as a police officer because I wouldn’t be able to toe the line. I wouldn’t be swearing allegiance to feminism and the LGBT community. And so I’d quickly be shunned by the rest of the force.

 

But, yeah, once upon a time, I think I could have been a good cop.

 

Joel Davis: No, in a healthy society, yeah the NSN would be the cops and we’d keep the streets safe. You know, that story the other day of that fat nigger that raped that poor young girl, and they had the CCTV. I posted it, Noticer News posted as well, this fat, disgusting nigger!

 

And I think I said in the replies to when the mainstream news posted the video, looking for the suspect, I was like:

 

“Why the fuck do we have negroes in Australia? Like, why the fuck are they here?”

 

Like, if you just stop and think, like, take a step back.

 

Blair Cottrell: They are a bioweapon!

 

Joel Davis: Just think how ridiculous that is! Why the fuck are they here?

 

Blair Cottrell: They are bioweapons!

 

Joel Davis: Why did we build planes and boats and transport fucking savage rapist beasts halfway across the fucking world into our country? You know, give them like Centerlink bucks and like feed them full of KFC hormones and just let them roam the streets, like with no supervision, like not even putting them in a cage or anything! They can just roam the streets! It’s like, what next? Like chimpanzees, lions? What other wildlife are going to bring from Africa? I mean, it’s fucking insane!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no comment. We want to start with the Superchats. We’ve got a few from Rumble. We’ve got the Shogun 21. Thanks very much:

 

“Violence prevails when democracy fails.”

 

Said Molotov Solution:

 

“If you enjoy metal and are red pilled, they are a must listen.”

 

Oh, it must be a band, Molotov Solution.

 

All right, Molotov Solution. It sounds interesting. I’m actually I won’t talk about that.

 

Anyway, next is Ukrainian groiper, sends through 10 bucks. You went through that one already, “Naan Nation”. Yeah. And Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends through $10. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“I wonder if the face mask ban will cover people wearing Groucho Marx glasses as a disguise?”

 

Maybe, but they said one of the reasons given for banning the face masks was it was protecting people from capsicum spray, which I don’t think face masks do very well.

 

Joel Davis: No, they don’t work.

 

Blair Cottrell: You need to have like a full gas mask with like airtight goggles to protect your eyes. It burns your skin too. Like, so it’s not really. It incapacitates you. I’ve been hit by mace once at a fair distance too. And it doesn’t matter who you are, that stuff incapacitates you for 10 minutes.

 

Joel Davis: If you have good goggles, you can deal with it. Like it’s kind of real spicy and that’s not great! But, excuse me. [coughing] Thinking of capsicum spray just like fucked me up then.

 

But if you have good goggles that keep it out of your eyes, it’s tolerable. It’s tolerable. It’s like eating like fuck loads of chilies or something. Like, if it gets in your nose or whatever, unless you get like straight in your mouth or something, then obviously.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you like spicy food, Joel? Do you like spicy food? Is that your thing?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, to an extent, but I’m not like, crazy about it. You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: I love the stuff.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t look like he sort of guy who would like spicy food, but I can’t get enough of it. Makes me salivate just thinking about spicy food.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not a huge fan of the Indian, maybe it’s just I’m so racist. I can’t bring myself to enjoy Indian food, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t eat Indian. Indian curries are just created to disguise the fact that the meat is off and really poor quality. That’s why Indians curried their food. They didn’t have refrigeration for a long time. So Indian cuisine is just rotten, poor quality food mixed in slop to disguise how bad it actually is. Like, I don’t know why people go to Indian restaurants. The fact that Indian restaurants even exist is ridiculous! I don’t know.

 

[1:43:55]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean first of all, the premise, an Indian is going to cook you dinner? Doesn’t matter what they’re making, that’s fucked! Anyway, Mexican food. I don’t mind the burrito, but from what I understand the burrito that as we understand it, is actually an American invention that’s White people improving Mexican cuisine and like upgrading it from, like, schlop to something like, actually edible.

 

So that’s not really a Mexican thing. It’s like fake Mexican. Tex Mex. I think it’s Texan. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Aussie autist 88 sends through five bucks. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“Happy midsummer. It’s two days time.”

 

Oh, someone knows. I won’t divulge anything about that. There’s nothing crazy going on. It’s just like a little private Christmas party.

 

But yeah, you guys might see some photos of that after the fact. We’ll see.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, Midsummer’s good to celebrate. We don’t celebrate it properly in Australia because unlike the Europeans, it’s like so close to Christmas where the Europeans is like the opposite side of the year.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. Hang on, isn’t Midsummer that movie. Is that the name of the movie?

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure there’s a movie called Midsummer I can’t think of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I was thinking of the direct Shakespeare’s, …

 

Joel Davis: The Midsummer’s Night Dream. That’s like a play.

 

Blair Cottrell: No. Okay, well I was thinking of our Christmas party in two days time which has a Midsummer dress theme. I might as well just give it away now.

 

Joel Davis: Dude OPSEC! OPSEC [Operations Security]! We can’t be divulging our private, … On our online show.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s just a dress code. [chuckling] Who cares like whatever. I hope we get some photos.

 

Joel Davis: We don’t. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just excited about it. I’ve already bought my get up and I’m excited!

 

Joel Davis: Why don’t we like go through our criminal records again on stream? And go through all the horrible things, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well okay, where do I begin? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] And then on Odysee I got a Superchat from Clever Name. Oh no, I already read that one. On Entropy I’ve got a Superchat from the Gump. He said:

 

“White people need to start to favour our own kind in business. That’s the only way to generate and keep resources in our group interests. Big contracts, fundings, positions. They all have diversity requirements to weaken us.”

 

Well I agree with that. Insofar as you can do business with Whites and work with Whites and so on, you always should. You absolutely should! And I think that’s quite clear and obvious a good thing to do. Personally I hate working with non-Whites, and your goal should be to work with them as little as possible, and if possible not at all do business with them. Not at all if you can. But I understand that a lot of industries it’s unavoidable so it is what it is for some people. But that should be your objective.

 

But also yeah like if you can source your produce from like local farmers, if you can get milk from local farmers, eggs from local farmers, etc. Meat is like not only is it going to be high quality and better for you, better for your health but also that’s so much better than going down to like you know the ZOG options of Woolies or Coles and like dumping your money into some foreign jew owned you know megacorp that is importing half the from overseas and injecting the other half of the with fucked up hormones that are bad for your health and screwing over Australian farmers etc. Etc. So yeah definitely always try and do your business locally and within the race.

 

But I think that’s more or less all the Superchats.

 

So thanks for watching the show this evening. It’s been a good chill stream. Unfortunately, Tom. Yeah suffered ZOG DDoS attacks and they took him out. They took out our boy. So RIP to the big man!

 

But I think next week we’ll figure out whatever was wrong there. We’ll fix that up. Hersant [Jacob] should have his setup sorted as well. He was supposed to be on tonight, but then some things came up.

 

So we’re gonna have Hersant and Tom on more again in the future, like it used to be. Well, Hersant’s been on a few times, but Tom used to be on more regularly. I do like doing the show when it’s like three or four of us a bit more because it’s kind of like often we cook up like a more intense conversation sometimes. What do you think?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it was pretty intense. Oh, well, it wasn’t as intense as some of our conversations, but we’re building on it.

 

Joel Davis: Some of the best shows, when we go up on tangents for like an hour. That’s some of the best content in my opinion.

 

[1:48:58]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, people watch the show in the background a lot of the time. The benefit of long streams is you can put them on while you’re doing other stuff. So people sometimes only catch glimpses of what you’re talking about, then they go back to it later if they’re really interested.

 

And that’s the point of these shows. It’s to kind of replace your standard television programme so you’re not being brainwashed by bad propaganda. You’re getting the good kind of propaganda from us. Because whatever you’re going to watch, it’s propaganda to some degree. Whatever you expose yourself to in the realm of entertainment information, it’s always propaganda to some degree. So choose the Right propaganda and you’ll know it’s the Right propaganda if you start if your life starts improving. I think like, one way to gauge the quality of the content you’re exposing yourself to is how your health shifts or develops or declines over time. Like, if you start watching a new type of political, ideological content, you get into that kind of thing, you’re into it for a few years. Compare the way you look and feel. Compare your physical health and your mental health to where you were three years prior, before you were into that stuff. If it’s worse, it’s probably shit for you. If it’s better, it’s good for you! And I seem to be getting healthier. So nationalism is good for you guys. Take my word for it.

 

I don’t know if I’m making no sense there. I’m getting to the point where I’m getting really drowsy.

 

But it’s been a good show, guys. Thanks for joining us.

 

Joel Davis: Before you go, that Ben Dawkins, who just quit the One Nation Party in WA, he just tweeted:

 

“I’ve been following some of the fallout from Parminder social media, but my press release says what I’m saying on my resignation from Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. I’ll post it tomorrow.”

 

So the fact that he mentioned it means it’s probably something to do with that. We’ll see tomorrow what comes out.

 

But yeah, keep up the pressure. Parmindergate has only just begun! Keep the pressure up on One Nation. If you’re not on Twitter, make a Twitter account. I’ve said this the whole time on this show. There’s a way to do online activism. You can make an impact online because everyone who’s speced into politics, works in politics, is in political media. They’re all on Twitter. If you can push narratives and direct conversations on Twitter, you can actually create an effect in actual politics if you do it effectively and aggressively with a big enough group. So get on there, help support the initiatives. And yeah, should be a Merry Christmas to everyone.

 

By the way, I know we’re still a few days out, but we probably won’t do another show until after Christmas. Maybe we will, maybe we won’t. Probably not. It’s a lot on, a lot of stuff with the community, with family and stuff I got to do personally. And that’s what you should be doing this time of year. Hopefully people have got time off work and you can spend it with your close friends, with your family in particular. And tis the season. Enjoy yourselves and we love you all. We’ll see you all in the next episode. And White fucking Power!

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[1:52:15]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/1/2026 = 63)

akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 day ago
You must worship the JEW, or you are a national security threat.
2
0

Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
The aesthetic argument against terrorism is very true! It doesn’t all have to surround logic or false logic, but cool or not cool, gay or not gay.

XYZezima
1 year ago
Know what sucks? I can’t shit right now. I’m sitting here with a log that is apparently just too wide to pass. It’s honestly stressing me out. Why the fuck do we have all these weird health problems? My body can’t even regulate the size of its own turds and now I’m going to have to go to the hospital or die of a blockage. It’s not even funny, this honestly sucks. I am barely 30, I don’t smoke, drink maybe two times a year, diet could be better but I always feel like shit. Fuck I hate this world. Went and bought a little bottle of milk, it had 21g of sugar. 21g of fucking sugar for some 2% darigold milk. The chocolate milk had as much sugar as a Pepsi, almost 50g. Insane. Absolutely insane to pump us full of so much sugar. And now I can’t even shit. You guys understand I’m sitting here and I’m going to die from a prolapsed asshole (look it up, not a joke) and my cats are going to eat my fucking body. These jews got my body to sabotage itself, choking on its own shit. .. I hate this world.

BuckinghamPhallus
1 year ago
ON being run by a retarded fat bastard versus the polished opposition Indian bastards is part of the ruse. if you’re talking about “your” Indian you’re not talking about why he is even fucking there. brilliant movement of Overton window

masklophobix
1 year ago
Can Joel please just spend 80 bucks on a webcam already?? Potato-vision needs to go.

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I understand you are Australians, but if you want to attract the attention of a wider audience, you need to focus on broader issues. Just a friendly advice.

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Gay

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I like how the neurotic harpy excludes specifically White MEN from her “discrimination” and “racist” list. “Laws” legitimize the state employees to use violence against you, physical violence. That’s what “Laws” are.

Motion937
1 year ago
Balaclavas would be totally acceptable to them if it were only left-wing activists wearing them.
1
0

kitsubot
VerifiedSupporter
1 year ago
Banning face masks at protests? Lets see them ban makeup – u can use face paint to obfuscate ur identity too
3
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
1 year ago
Ban left wing activists & politicians.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
EMJ addressing similair themes; https://rumble.com/v62kcve-chicago-talk-show-host-emj-interview-5-translate-hate-the-catholic-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas Joel. Don’t let the bastards get you down.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas https://rumble.com/v5zbhph-the-xmas-song-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Xmas larf

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
‘JEWS HATE FREEDOM’. That is a great op when you objectively look at the power these cunts are abusing in parliament in Victoria. Well done Joel & lads.

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Melb- Canberra-DC-City of London

fdgrdfg
1 year ago
55:25 So India’s population in 1858 year was 203.000.000 of Indians and 20.000 British soldiers conquered them? That’s like 1:10000 ratio wtf.

BradC1988
1 year ago
White Fucking Power! o/
2
0

Rumbolinawave321
1 year ago
It’s a simple question How many immigrants are India taking? And if they aren’t taking any, why is it so?
3
0

newgerman
1 year ago
Talking about terrorism as she did without a peep about Israeli massacres.. then mentioning “anti-Semitism”… GOD IT IS FUCKING ENRAGING!!!!!
3
0

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
…nice shiner, btw

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
I heard this saying once, “In youth, wisdom and beauty is rare”. I think that this applies to you Joel. I am always impressed by your deep insight into such a wide array of subjects, fringed with a decent sense of humour, for someone so young. Always stay humble and hold fast. Thanks, from a Canadian. Blair and Tom are equally interesting to listen to. You men all seem to embody the spirit of our common gentlemanly ancestry with your decorum and manners.
2
0

Bumble_Bee
1 year ago
Anders Breivik, JDL confederate shoots up a bunch of boycott Israel Labor supporters on an island after the U.N voted to give Palestine a spot in the E.U parliament…. Brenton Tarrant the very year of the Pandemic did a hollywood style performance art that mirrors Wendy Scur’s account at Port Aurthur in which not only was there a ammo mag left in the hallway as Brenton Enters, the bodies laying by the chairs move by the time Brenton re-enters the mosque… All the bodies were not ripped apart by high velocity rounds nor at point blank range…also, Firearms experts show that nato rounds will go right through walls and produce smoke in enclosed spaces like that, Brenton was using an airgun and those “Muslims” were actors and the whole operation was a Mossad public relations excercise…. all in time for the pandemic…. which I’m sure they knew was coming… because Trump went to China and what a perfect place in China’s corrupt and disorganized system to launch a controlled release of a virus…(even it was even a virus since they’ve never isolated it nor shown what “covid 19″ actually is”

› Show 1 reply
FJB6666
1 year ago
Again. FFS. Joel your a LEGEND. I love your rants. They are the best..
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Joel, your a LEGEND. I love your rants. There the best.
7
0

Pincermovement
1 year ago
Go black face
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Thomas should shorten his moustache, he’s needs the Adolf look.
6
0

LordVividColours
1 year ago
Blair was for sure on to something when he was talking about choosing the right propaganda to consume I became a nationalist about 2 years ago and in that time I quit smoking weed & tobacco, I stopped being a total degenerate, I got more & more active, I learned to see the bad propaganda clearly, I lost a shit tonne of weight and slowly my life has more meaning giving me more drive to actually have a life instead of an existence. I’d rather kill myself than go back to the way I was
23
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
UncircumcisedCircus
1 year ago
The system relies on people being doped up/down for people to not notice. The more sober I have been the easier it was to see through the lies.
4
0

newgerman
1 year ago
good for you man
2
0

MadHatterAU
1 year ago
Les Dawson could model that face on churches as a gargoyle.

› Show 1 reply
jjbeez57
1 year ago
Elephant in the living room…. Tom’s moustache looks gay. Sorry to say this as the guy’s a legend, but the people around him need to let him know. Like the intervention of an alcoholic by friends and family, they do it because they love them.
0
2

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
The stream breaks up with Tom’s very contentious exam into the racial nature of souls. Coincidence? Australian disrupt law?

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter+
1 year ago
You have officially lost your freedom gentlemen.
0
3

ProvingNihil
1 year ago
Those laws for wearing face masks are ridiculous, they’re desperate at this point to find out our identity.
1
0

RoseRock444
Supporter
1 year ago
There is no such thing as a soul, Blair
1
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Soul from from Old English sawol from Old Norse sala from Proto-Germanic *saiwalō. “It has been suspected to have meant originally “coming from or belonging to the sea,” the supposed stopping place of the soul before birth or after death [Barnhart]; if so, it would be from Proto-Germanic *saiwaz (see sea). Klein explains this as “from the lake,” as a dwelling-place of souls in ancient northern Europe.” [etymonline source] Our soul is our “gene-lake” or “gene-pool”

bush_bash_boy
1 year ago
for an extremely smart fella, joel does the cause and himself, a disservice by talking about sensitive subjects, such as terrorism, and using words like “it’s gay” and “edge lord”. completely fine to say between mates, but it’s hard to take you serions when you talk like a troll.
8
7

‹ Hide 5 replies
EnglandAwake
1 year ago
Shut the fuck up with your unearned critiques.
6
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
HKeithVarange88
1 year ago
It was authoritative and humorous, don’t be a boomer
5
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
NaziGoering
1 year ago
He’s right. Joel talks like a troll because he thinks it sounds “edgey” but it’s just cringey.
5
2

‹ Hide 2 replies
whitehonkymonkey
1 year ago
agree, this podcast below , clearly states how hitler respected other cultures,yet preferred to separate. spoke about what was beneficial to germany and the messaging, he agreed with goebbels, talking down the others was of no benefit to the movement. why joel and some others fall for this denigration does not benefit the national socialist movement, if such people continue on this path,the jews win. comment below not aimed at you nazigoering. do as the fuhrer would do, FFS. yes your feeling a bit hurt by these comments, but please get on board we need to win over the masses. keep the denigration at home if you cant control it. be like the fuhrer. thank you. HH.https://rumble.com/v5jtq51-all-the-lies-you-have-been-told-about-hitler-part-1-x-space.html?playlist_id=watch-history
0
1
newgerman
1 year ago
This was an excellent WN discussion by the Three Aussi-teers. Where’s “Numero quatro”? Hope he’s not in jail or some shit. Above all, heartfelt congratulations on the upcoming baby, Mr. Sewell
1
0

LaborCorruptionCommission
1 year ago
Those guys are doing so much damage. Islam is the immediate problem. STFU and let their terrorism be front and centre. This shit just lets people be diverted to the Far Righht boogey man. IQ is not one of their qualities.
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Last comment I promise. But it seems like that fat jew cow on TV was talking directly to you guys. o/o/o/
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Jews always pass anti-“hate speech” laws right before they do a white genocide. It’s textbook for them, just like 9/11 and October 7th. It’s impressive how they have this shit down to a tee
9
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Main reference for this would be the Bolshevik Revolution, which I believe was simple a prototype of the worldwide cabal they intend to form. And they’ll mobilize their mud golems to carry it out against their white “oppressors” but I’m not worried because a few whites always crawl out of the ashes and rebuild. It’s just a condition of our existence to repeatedly overcome Jews and their golems.
4
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
“His terrorism was boring and gay” hahahahaha
2
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
I’m kind of surprised we still have a first and second amendment in USA at this point. It’s like the only based thing about living in this gay empire
2
1

Boonske
1 year ago
LIKE AND SHARE THE STREAM ITS THE LEAST YOU CAN DO
7
3

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Graham Connolly: It’s easy, though, when it was you, because I know you.

 

Talk Tim. [mic check]

 

Tim Lutze: Check, check.

 

Graham Connolly: Do it again.

 

Tim Lutze: Check, check.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Yep. Perfect.

 

All right, we’re back for part two of the Offaly Offensive with Tim Lutz. We finished up, …

 

Tim Lutze: No, thanks for having me in your mum’s basement here. Yeah, it’s a pleasure.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s all right. [chuckling] We finished up talking about when you were doxed. That’s where we got to. And you were just getting to kind of how you let everything settle. You didn’t deal with it all straight away. You wanted to sort of give it space to breathe.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And then let’s talk about how you sort of came out again when you tried to deal with it then.

 

Tim Lutze: So we let some time pass and then we took it to VCAT*, which is sort of like a tribunal, like a legal tribunal, sort of avenue for businesses and stuff of that nature to take. And VCAT said to us that we had to basically settle it with Boxing Australia.

 

[* The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal was formed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 in the state of Victoria, Australia. As part of the Victorian Justice system the tribunal sits ‘below’ the Magistrates Court in the court hierarchy. However the tribunal itself is not a court, not possessing any jurisdiction or powers beyond those conferred by statute. VCAT is less formal than a court and helps resolve disputes through mediations, compulsory conferences and formal hearings. Wikipedia]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, they suggested it.

 

Tim Lutze: They suggested it.

 

Graham Connolly: If I think I remember that they were like:

 

“You can do this, but we would suggest or advise that you would try to sort it out between yourselves first.”

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. So we did go to sit down with the committee of Boxing Australia and put our case forward.

 

Graham Connolly: Boxing Australia or Boxing Victoria?

 

Tim Lutze: No, Boxing Australia. Boxing Victoria was there. David Pike was the president of Boxing Australia. He was there, not in person, but through video link.

 

And yeah, we just put our case forwards that we live in a liberal democracy and we’re entitled to our political opinions and that basically it has nothing to do with them. And their attitude was that because I’m registered with Boxing Victoria and I’m licenced by them, that I represent them and that they can’t be seen represented by someone with my opinions.

 

Graham Connolly: So you can only be a liberal, or a conservative, or a Labor voter, or you can be, … That’s all you can be. Yeah, you can be a communist!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So the only thing you can’t be is a National Socialist. A socialist for your own people.

 

Tim Lutze: And they said that:

 

“They can’t associate with people with these views.”

 

And I said, …

 

Graham Connolly: They can associate with bikies now, can’t they?

 

Tim Lutze: Well, that was my, …

 

Graham Connolly: Organised crime?

 

Tim Lutze: I basically said to them that at the fights they literally parade and announce when key organised criminals are attending. They’ll stand up and they’ll announce, …

 

Graham Connolly: Like celebrities.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, they’ll thank you know, one of these trade unions is their main sponsor and they have been caught doing all sorts of illegal activities. There are gyms that associated with organised criminals. There are gyms that are associated with outlaw motorcycle clubs. And some of these organisations and some of these clubs and stuff, they have been convicted of trafficking drugs or women or whatever. But they draw the line at racism!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. To draw the line at loving your own people.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. So that was my argument. And basically they just said:

 

“Yeah, that’s how it is.”

 

You know, they tried to get me to, it doesn’t even matter, but like, yeah, that was it! They just said:

 

“For your political views, we’re not going to licence you!”

 

Graham Connolly: Not only not going to licence you, but strip you, … You were already licenced.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So they stripped you of your licence.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, they wouldn’t let me register a gym or register a fighter or register myself if I wanted to fight.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, so it was that or basically they, … What if you had renounced your views and your connection to the NSN?

 

Tim Lutze: Well, I did kind of like, it was a long hearing and I did articulate myself a lot better than what I’m representing now because I’m trying to remember.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s a long time ago now.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, it is. This is probably two years ago. And like I said, it was a long meeting. But we did go through, they asked me also:

 

“Are you a member of this organisation?”

 

I said:

 

“Yes!”

 

And we went through what the organisation was, what it represented. I did the whole, “it’s love for my own people. It’s not about hate for others”. I laid out the worldview for them. You know, I was an open book, I didn’t lie. I didn’t say I wasn’t an associate.

 

Graham Connolly: You didn’t go down this road, start lying about it?

 

Tim Lutze: No, I didn’t. No. And they were shocked! They all sat back in their chairs, …

 

Graham Connolly: Because they expected you to, because if you lied, maybe they would have been able to go:

 

“Okay, we can, …”

 

Basically, that’s denouncing everything that you believe in.

 

Tim Lutze: Yep.

 

[05:56]

 

Graham Connolly: You would never have went down this road in the first place if you were going to turn around then and denounce it.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, that’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: It’s not your personality.

 

Tim Lutze: No, no. And, yeah, so we went through all the worldview. And then they said that:

 

“It’s a bad image for them.”

 

And I said:

 

“What about all the organised criminals and outlaw motorcycle clubs that you just associate yourselves with? You don’t seem to have a problem.”

 

Like there’s fighters that are well known for their ties to that criminal underbelly.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: And:

 

“I don’t think it has anything to do with boxing personally.”

 

Graham Connolly: What was their answer to that?

 

Tim Lutze: Boxing is boxing! And it doesn’t matter if you’re the best fighter, if you want to prove you’re the best fighter, I don’t think it really matters where you come from. Get in the ring and prove it!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. So that’s the whole point about it!

 

Tim Lutze: I’m not saying that they should be not allowing these people, but they, …

 

Graham Connolly: Should be allowing you, though!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, exactly!

 

Graham Connolly: You’re not asking them to advocate for your belief system.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. What they were trying to do was come at it from a moral standpoint.

 

Graham Connolly: But they don’t have moral standpoint.

 

Tim Lutze: I was trying to point out to them:

 

“But it’s not a moral standpoint.”

 

Graham Connolly: No, it’s not.

 

Tim Lutze: It’s one of cowardice and intimidation!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Which is the opposite of what boxing is all about.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, exactly!

 

Graham Connolly: And so how did they respond to your sort of pointing out their hypocrisy about organised crime being involved. Just silence?

 

Tim Lutze: They asked me who I was talking about and tried to get me to name names. Probably to put myself in a very awkward position.

 

Graham Connolly: Like they don’t already know.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, exactly! And I just said, …

 

Graham Connolly:

 

“You know exactly who I’m talking about!”

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah:

 

“I don’t need to tell you who.”

 

And they said:

 

“Oh, are you talking about this person?”

 

I said:

 

“I’m not talking about anyone! You either do have them and parade them or you don’t! You don’t need to ask me who it either is or it isn’t!”

 

And they didn’t deny it!

 

Graham Connolly: No, of course they didn’t deny it.

 

But they tried to put it back on you and deflect and all that sort of thing. So they didn’t have to deal with the truth!

 

Tim Lutze: I took it as, yeah, they tried to put me in danger.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, put you in danger.

 

Tim Lutze: So that’s not who I am, though.

 

Graham Connolly: No. All right. But you still had your gym for a while after that?

 

Tim Lutze: Oh, yeah, I had the gym until Australia Day 2024.

 

Graham Connolly: And actually let me go back a small bit. As part of your, I suppose, let’s call it an appeal or whatever it was, you had members of your gym write letters and stuff?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. I had countless, like as many letters as I needed from former members from, …

 

Graham Connolly: Even non-Whites?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Different backgrounds.

 

Graham Connolly: To say that they felt welcome and safe and comfortable in your gym?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. I had all the references and that. Like:

 

“I’ve never had a complaint made against me. Never been warned for anything. I’ve always conducted myself respectfully in the corner. I haven’t yelled at a lot of these judges or anything like that before.”

 

Graham Connolly: And a lot of these members met me and met Jimbo and met Tom, met all of us and never had any issues with any of us. There was never any conflict. There was never any fighting.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Like we had a big Christmas party, at Legacy 2022 or 3. And where some of the fighters and myself, we fought each other. And the EAM [European Australian Movement] came down and family and friends came down as a big event, and it was actually quite funny. Some former champions even an Aboriginal former champion there actually met Tom. And yeah, that was actually quite funny to see. Everyone was being respectful.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: There’s a time and place for everything. And boxing’ boxing!

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! Sport is sport.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, that’s right. We weren’t at the fights throwing Romans and wearing black block to the fights with balaclavas.

 

Graham Connolly: Like it was a separate thing.

 

Tim Lutze: That’s right! And that’s how it should.

 

Graham Connolly: Actually explain, what’s EAM?

 

Tim Lutze: EAM is a community building and a training initiative of White Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep. What does it stand for?

 

Tim Lutze: European Australian Movement.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep. So they advocate for and build community for European Australians.

 

[10:12]

 

Tim Lutze: Building a community. That’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: For heritage Australians, I would consider it, really. White Australians.

 

Tim Lutze: That’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: European Australians.

 

Tim Lutze: Yep. All sorts of communities.

 

Graham Connolly: They don’t engage in the activism, that’s NSN? European Australia Movement, …

 

Tim Lutze: There’s Crossover. Not everyone joins to be an activist.

 

Graham Connolly: No.

 

Tim Lutze: Most people do.

 

Graham Connolly: But EAM is focused on the community building, the barbecues.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, the barbecues.

 

Graham Connolly: The women and the children, the families.

 

Tim Lutze: That’s right.

 

Graham Connolly: And boxing, the training, the running.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, and Legacy was even a step removed from that.

 

Graham Connolly: It was! Yeah, it wasn’t even that. Yeah, exactly!

 

Tim Lutze: But they made it that! Yeah, they made it a White only gym!

 

Graham Connolly: So in reality, right, if they hadn’t taken away your licence, if they hadn’t taken away your coaching licence, if they hadn’t taken away your gyms accreditation or whatever you want to call it, none of these fighters would have left your gym because they could have continued to compete. They didn’t have a problem until they couldn’t compete under you as a coach.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. I don’t know, maybe some of them would have, maybe they, …

 

Graham Connolly: Maybe someone would, but they didn’t until then.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. You’ll never know.

 

Graham Connolly: No, you never know. But until you lost your coaching licence, they were still there.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. They were well aware who Tom was and everything like that. Every fighter there knew! Yeah, well, you know, except for my, the friend I grew up with who was the police officer.

 

Graham Connolly: The jujitsu guy was he aware?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, he was. Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: I don’t want to give too much information.

 

Graham Connolly: Okay, yeah, fair enough.

 

So you losing your licence then had a knock on effect of these guys who were top quality boxers under you as their coach who were aspiring to be Olympians.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: National champions. This kind of quality fighter. They wanted to pursue their boxing career.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. And like, very few people get engaged in politics the way we do.

 

Graham Connolly: Very few people.

 

Tim Lutze: They were there to box. And yeah, we like talking and debating and all that sort of stuff. But they were there for boxing, as most people go to a boxing gym for.

 

Graham Connolly: But the reality is, …

 

Tim Lutze: The accusation I was there with young boxers radicalising them, that’s completely untrue.

 

Graham Connolly: Completely untrue! What were you doing? You weren’t radicalising non-Whites to be White supremacists! [chuckling] You know what I mean? Not at all! So it was a separate thing.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, like it was Crossover, like everything.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Insane!

 

So where did it go from there?

 

Tim Lutze: So as the membership sort of faded out in a couple months after the dox, it was just about two years of EAM at Legacy. And Legacy had just morphed into a White power boxing gym.

 

Graham Connolly: Something it never was before.

 

Tim Lutze: No. But I was very happy for it that it did turn into that.

 

Graham Connolly: It was awesome, wasn’t it?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, it was. Would I have liked to spend a couple more years in the boxing scene? Yeah, sure, of course.

 

Graham Connolly: You even contemplated going to league, didn’t you?

 

Tim Lutze: Oh, don’t want to say too much about that. Yeah, just morphed into Legacy boxing, and there was a fundraiser started by I think Jimbo actually took the initiative to start it and raised a lot of money. We were able to keep the gym open for a couple years.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: Until they basically kicked us out of the building because of all the, …

 

Graham Connolly: That’s another thing. So they tried everything to get you kicked out of the building.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, there were protests. There were hundreds of people come down and there were horses, riot horses and police and helicopters, and we did a White powerlifting competition while there was a huge protest outside.

 

Graham Connolly: Was it a White “powerlifting” competition or was it a “White” powerlifting competition? [chuckling] That was the whole point of the flyer, wasn’t it? [chuckling]

 

Tim Lutze: It was! And it sounded really good in the news. A White powerlifting competition.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. White Powerlifting Competition!

 

Tim Lutze: So many good times in the gym. And there was a couple nights that all the boys stayed over there and we did a powerlifting competition there and a fight, …

 

Graham Connolly: So when we did the powerlifting competition, there was a massive Left-wing protest!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Police on the streets. Street barricaded!

 

Tim Lutze: A national event. So all the States came down and it was like a three day event.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

[15:20]

 

Tim Lutze: We did the seminar and all that. So we were there the whole weekend and taking shifts, watching the gate.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: On the Friday when we’re having, … Well, some of the States came down early. We went out for dinner. There was a little bit of vandalism that went on, but you know like, it wasn’t too bad.

 

Graham Connolly: They got your neighbour’s building, didn’t they?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And we cleaned it up, and that’s what National Socialists do!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, they threw paint bombs at the Turkish neighbours factory and, …

 

Graham Connolly: We cleaned it up.

 

Tim Lutze: We cleaned it up for him. Did some minor damage to the gate. Which we fixed. But yeah, we watched the gate for the rest of the weekend for that. And it was just funny.

 

Graham Connolly: We had helicopters over, …

 

Tim Lutze: Helicopters, news helicopters, police helicopters!

 

Graham Connolly: While we were cooking a barbecue!

 

Tim Lutze: You know, they designated the that part of Sunshine*. Which “designated” means, it’s basically what they do when there’s a huge event or they think there’s going to be a lot of trouble. They’ll designate an area which basically means they can search anyone they want, they can remove masks, they can move people on from the designated area, which we were worried about them doing that to friendlies.

 

But no, it was awesome! They blocked off both streets to Legacy. Our buses were allowed in and out to go pick up supporters and that.

 

[* Sunshine is a suburb in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 12 km (7.5 mi) west of Melbourne’s Central Business District, located within the City of Brimbank local government area. Sunshine recorded a population of 9, 445 at the 2021 census. Sunshine, initially a town just outside Melbourne, is today a residential suburb with a mix of period and post-War homes, with a town centre that is an important retail centre in Melbourne’s west. It is also one of Melbourne’s principal places of employment outside the CBD with many industrial companies situated in the area, and is an important public transport hub with both V/Line and Metro services at Sunshine railway station and its adjacent major bus interchange.]

 

Graham Connolly: And these same people, they tried to contact council to get you kicked out?

 

Tim Lutze: Oh, yeah, there was a lot of council meetings. There was a lot of harassment.

 

Graham Connolly: Council admitted that, …

 

Tim Lutze: Multiple fire ispections to get the fire hydrants checked, there was multiple building inspections, …

 

Graham Connolly: But everything was above board.

 

Tim Lutze: Had to fix this light globe in the exit sign. Everything they could! And my business partner just made sure that all the T’s were across and the I’s were dotted and there was just nothing they could do until our lease ran out. You know, when our lease ran out, the real estate had just had enough and didn’t want to renew the lease.

 

Graham Connolly: But didn’t you have like, in your lease, some sort of a contract that basically allowed you to renew your lease, like on an ongoing basis?

 

Tim Lutze: That was the argument. But I’m pretty sure at the end of the day, if they don’t, there’s, …

 

Graham Connolly: Nothing you can do about it.

 

Tim Lutze: If they don’t want to renew your lease, they don’t have to. Yeah, there probably is something like you get first preference or whatever.

 

Graham Connolly: When they failed at council, they went to the real estate agent.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Or the owner or the landlord or whatever you want to call it, and put pressure on him and eventually they succeeded, I guess.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Well, it just means that we just need to pull resources and get our own gyms.

 

Graham Connolly: We need to buy our own!

 

Tim Lutze: Our own buildings that we can’t be kicked out of graham Connolly: Or we need people that can’t be pressured. We need landlords that can’t be pressured.

 

Tim Lutze: You can get the permits, you can keep the gym up to compliance.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: And there’s always they can do about it. There’s nothing, absolutely nothing! If you own it, there’s nothing you can do about it. I own my house, you know like if you own it, there’s absolutely nothing they can do.

 

Graham Connolly: There’s nothing to do about it. There was one time when we did a bait and switch in your gym and we baited the Left into protesting at your gym while we had two people there cooking a barbecue, and we went into the city. Do you remember? Because I can’t remember. What do you remember what our banner was for that one or what which protest that was?

 

Tim Lutze: Voice equals anti-White.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, that was the banner. Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: So what The Voice was, it was a Aboriginal Voice to Parliament so that basically they have their own racial voice in Parliament. They’d be the only people to have that, or since the destruction of the White Australia Policy.

 

But yeah, they wanted their own ethnic voice to Parliament and the traitors in the government wanted to do that. But in order to do that, to put it to a vote.

 

But before the rally was organised, the Left had organised a “drive Nazis out of Sunshine”, a rally against Legacy. And they were going to do another protest there. And so we left a few guys there for security and we secretly went into the city for the NO rally.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: And basically all the communists and the Left where all motivated to go down to Legacy and Sunshine where there were like horses and police. Another thing was there was barely any police in the city.

 

But yeah, so we went and infiltrated the NO rally. Which was all about the NO rally was centreed around:

 

“We’re not racist. We just don’t think that any race should have a voice. And we’re pro-multicultural!”

 

And all that. And we turned up out in plain clothes. Halfway through the rally we switched, we switched into the black. We pulled out the banner and we just said:

 

“Voice equals anti-White. That’s why you should vote No!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: I was pepper sprayed off the steps. It was that nice photo of me getting pepper sprayed.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Iconic I would call it.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Pepper spray doesn’t really affect me. It’s actually quite soothing!

 

[20:45]

 

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, you blocked it like a boxer.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, head movement.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, head movement that went from the pepper spray!

 

Tim Lutze: So we just made a racial issue, which is what it was.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah, it was.

 

Tim Lutze: And then I’ve just been helping Tom and Jacob achieve each goal as they want to achieve it, and doing whatever I can.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: To help them.

 

Graham Connolly: And being constantly punished along the way!

 

Tim Lutze: A couple months after, bank account shut, having the gym vandalised and having my cars vandalised and my home firebombed.

 

Graham Connolly: You had your home firebombed?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. It’s very rare to experience what I’ve experienced. You know, I don’t want to scare people off, …

 

Graham Connolly: But nobody else has! Nobody else has got what you’ve got. And I think it is because of your community profile, like being a boxing coach. Having your own gym, having your own brand.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. The gym was public knowledge of the address and stuff.

 

Graham Connolly: They targeted your missus. They put posters up. These people are scumbags! The put posters of your missus up!

 

Tim Lutze: They found out where my kids do sports and got them kicked out of their sports. This stuff doesn’t really happen as much anymore.

 

Graham Connolly: No. Because they didn’t break you! They expect to break people with this stuff.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: They didn’t break you. They didn’t break your wife. Didn’t break your children.

 

Tim Lutze: So the car bombing motivated me more than anything. You know, if I had to say there were like, big events. There was Covid, you know, …

 

Graham Connolly: Give a brief overview of how the police handled the car bombing.

 

Tim Lutze: So the big things were Covid where you can see the government corruption and the lies!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: Straight through them! And the next big thing was the car bombing. And Blair Cottrell really took the words out of my mouth in a video or when he was on the Joel and Blair stream after the event, when he said that he would have thought in a country like Australia, no matter what your political views are, that if your home was a target of terrorism or firebombing, that the police would at least pretend!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: You know, they would pretend to act and pretend to investigate.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep. But did they?

 

Tim Lutze: When I was woken up by it and I went outside and my missus got on the phone to the fire department, told him the car had been firebombed or whatever. And the fire department came, and then the police came. And a couple of the firebombs bounced off my other car and had landed on my lawn. And they were still just sitting there burning. And so I said to the police:

 

“What do you want to do with these?”

 

And they just said:

 

“Just throw them in the bin. Just get rid of them!”

 

That’s what they said:

 

“Just get rid of them!”

 

Graham Connolly: They didn’t want the evidence!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. And the car had been put out and the fire department were packing up. I expected, I don’t know, I just watch movies. That’s what I was going by. But I expected like, the fire department to start doing some investigating or take photos. I didn’t even talk to them. They like, packed up their stuff and they just drove off!

 

Graham Connolly: And left fire bombs on your lawn.

 

Tim Lutze: So then the these two police came over. My neighbours were all out. My neighbours like, they’re aware of me and they’re actually real supportive and they were out and ready to go straight away.

 

Graham Connolly: But they couldn’t like Boxing Victoria, they can separate, … The neighbour from the political, whatever your political personality might be or whatever your political profile might be, you’re a good neighbour.

 

Tim Lutze: Police walk over to me in uniforms. They said:

 

“What happened?”

 

And I said:

 

“I think car was firebombed.”

 

And first thing was like:

 

“Is it insured?”

 

And I said:

 

“No.”

 

They kind of sighed:

 

“Oh, fuck! So it’s like, not an insurance job?”

 

And then they got my name and everything and they said:

 

“Do I know why someone would want to do this?”

 

And I said:

 

“Well I’m a bit of a political dissident. I used to own a boxing gym and I’m known as a White nationalist and stuff.”

 

And so they’re writing it all down and they went:

 

“All right.”

 

And they went back to their car. And I just cleaned it up and trying to calm down or whatever and talking to the neighbours. And then they just sat in the car for ages. I don’t know how long it was, but like straight away, a couple of the boys rocked up and Jacob Hersant.

 

And we went inside, and then the police came back over and I think that’s when I asked him:

 

“Like, what do you want to do with all this?”

 

Like, no one touched it. And they’re just like:

 

“Get rid of it.”

 

And then they’re like:

 

“We’re gonna wait here, and then someone’s gonna come and take a statement or whatever.”

 

And then Jacob’s like:

 

“Yeah, give him a statement.”

 

And then I was like:

 

“Okay.”

 

So then another cop came and he took it. You know, I think he would have been a detective or something. I don’t know.

 

But, yeah, he took a statement. But actually the car was in my partner’s name, so they actually wanted her to get the statement. And it was basically for the purpose of if she wanted to do a “victim of crime” or whatever and get money or something, that was the purpose of it, basically. Yeah, he just said:

 

“All right, that’s it. I’ll see you later.”

 

[26:43]

 

 

So the next day, Tom was there and bunch of the community were there, because that’s what happens when you’re attacked. And then the police rang me and said:

 

“Can we come and talk to you?”

 

And Tom was there. And he said:

 

“Yeah, tell him to come.”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, no worries.”

 

So they came, and then they rang me and said:

 

“We’re not coming inside.”

 

And I said:

 

“Why not?”

 

And they said:

 

“Oh, because we could see Thomas Sewell’s there, his cars out there, and there’s other people there.”

 

Graham Connolly: I was there as well.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah:

 

“It’s not safe for us.”

 

So I was like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

And I said:

 

“What do you mean?”

 

I said:

 

“There’s children in here.”

 

He’s like:

 

“No! We have protocols. We’re not coming in.”

 

And he goes:

 

“You need to come to the station.”

 

I said:

 

“Why? There’s too many police there.”

 

Graham Connolly: If this was any other community, …

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Who was getting support from their community.

 

Tim Lutze: If this was the Asian community.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And they had their neighbours over, basically. Their supportive neighbours over to support them in this time.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Would the police have not come inside?

 

Tim Lutze: Absolutely not!

 

Graham Connolly: I mean, would like for any other community they would have come inside.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, that was one of the things I said when I was on the phone to them. So he said:

 

“Well, we’re not coming in.”

 

I said:

 

“Well, that’s fine.”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: And basically, I didn’t hear from him for a few months. And then after maybe a year, they just said that:

 

“They’ve done their investigation. They haven’t found anything.”

 

Graham Connolly: Of course, they didn’t.

 

Tim Lutze: And I said:

 

“How are you going to find anything? You had no photos, fingerprints. Like what are you going to find?”

 

Graham Connolly: The truth is these people aren’t hard to find.

 

Tim Lutze: No. No! So we’ve done our investigations, we know what’s what. But this has been an ongoing thing and, …

 

Graham Connolly: Violence from the communists is basically State backed.

 

Tim Lutze: Yep. And I think that’s where we come to the March for Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: The March for Australia.

 

Tim Lutze: And from the start of the day to the end of the day it was just violence, violent disorder, afray.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: You know, from the whole day.

 

Graham Connolly: The whole day! There’s a video of you guys, …

 

Tim Lutze: And none of it, … And all of it coming from the communists.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, from the Left, communists, turning up with gloves on, ready to fight.

 

Tim Lutze: Plastic padded gloves! Masks!

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: We weren’t wearing masks.

 

Graham Connolly: There’s a video that is uncut from the from you guys planning how you’re gonna get into the march, into Fed Square. Right? You guys met Tom, gave a little plan:

 

“We’re going to come up here, we’re going to cross the bridge, we’re going to get into Fed Square.”

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And so that video shows that you guys planned to get to Fed Square, join the march.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And then you can see in this video as you guys come up the stairs as you try to cross the bridge, these Antifa guys, communist guys, whatever you want to call them, with their gloves on, ready to fight. They thought we’re going to have a good time. They even put a post out online to say where you guys were and to:

 

“Meet us on the bridge and to go and have fun!”

 

Yeah, basically.

 

So these people wanted to stand in your path. You have every right to walk, …

 

Tim Lutze: You’ve got motive, you’ve got orders, you’ve got everything you need for violent disorder. But here’s the thing.

 

Graham Connolly: So just one more thing I want to say before you go on further. These are the same people who have been rallying with the Palestinians every week for a hundred weeks or something or every month or what was it? They’re basically been going for like 100 weeks straight now. Not one time have NSN turned up to disrupt their march. Not once!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: The first time NSN turn up to a march for the Australia March, these people turn up to disrupt, to stand in their path. Like as if they have every right to block you guys from attending a protest.

 

Tim Lutze: No, they turn up with the intention of using violence.

 

Graham Connolly: They turn up with the intention of, … Well, they want to use violence to prevent you guys crossing the bridge to join the protest!

 

[30:52]

 

 

Tim Lutze: So the March for Australia. Well, I was involved in a lot of the organising with that, with other organisers. You know, just logistically with the routes and the stage and the timings and the speakers and all this stuff. And part of the organisation was police liaison, someone that was talking in contact with the police and all that. And so the police liaison approached us where we were stepping off from. And he notified the police where we would be coming in and exactly what time. Some of our children were at the march. Some of the ladies and some of the children that were there, they arrived from that end as well, across the bridge. And they said that:

 

“Yeah, there were a lot of police on the bridge.”

 

And that sort of thing. And she said about 10 minutes before we got there and she said:

 

“There were horses and stuff blocking the other end on Swanson street from the state Library where the communists were meeting.”

 

And she said that:

 

“All the police on the bridge, about 5 minutes, 10 minutes before we got there, all came away from the bridge and onto the other side.”

 

Do that information what you will.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep. So they cleared the bridge where, …

 

Tim Lutze: So that was right about when we notified the police liaison on what time we’d be coming, was about five or ten minutes before we actually emerged from the bridge.

 

Graham Connolly: So you gotta assume that these guys hoped that you guys, …

 

Tim Lutze: We notified them where and what time, …

 

Graham Connolly: You could be stopped with violence!

 

Tim Lutze: And, which is rare for our organisation. You know, to be that cooperative. But we gave them the benefit of the doubt.

 

Graham Connolly: And you’d also have to assume that the reason there’s been no charges led for anybody for that first fight on the bridge is because you guys liaised, you guys were open and honest about where you were going, your movements, and that they don’t arrest Antifa. They don’t arrest communists!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So if they were to arrest anybody for that particular fight, it would have to be the other side. So they just., … That’s been ignored now! Completely ignored!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. We met with our supporters and our members just near that bridge and we just told everyone:

 

“All right, we’re going to go in a group in a blob and we’re going to head towards the rally. We’ve got intelligence that tells us there are Antifa in the area but we will probably be fine. You know, just stick, basically, behind the guys with the black jackets.”

 

 

 

Graham Connolly: You guys put out a video a few days earlier. Sorry to cut in, but you guys put out a video a few days earlier stating a policy of, … Because you knew that you were going to face this kind of violence on that, and you put out a policy to teach your members what to do in this sort of a scenario. And because normally we try to avoid violence, we try to avoid confrontation, we try to avoid that kind of thing.

 

But in this scenario, you guys had a had a policy that if somebody gets within one meter of you double push!

 

Tim Lutze: And two weeks before we did a big national march.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: You know, 150 people in the city.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: And basically a homeless man just ran up and assaulted Tom.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes.

 

Tim Lutze: All right. And there were incidents where people were getting right up into the ranks and were spitting and swearing and stuff. And so we sort of said that now there’s a policy. There’s a one meter policy. You tell them to get back. If they get within one meter. You get space!

 

Graham Connolly: Double push!

 

Tim Lutze: You get space!

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: You know, you do not let them within one meter of you.

 

Graham Connolly: And those videos exist.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: So anybody wants to see, those videos exist.

 

Tim Lutze: I don’t know if they’ll post it publicly.

 

Graham Connolly: Okay. Yeah, but maybe we should at some point post them publicly?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah that was the instructions. Don’t let people within one meter because, …

 

Graham Connolly: Well, it’s dangerous now!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, it is dangerous.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. One in the neck and it’s all over!

 

Tim Lutze: You see elderly people just get swung on, like just for having Australian T-shirts or whatever.

 

And so, yeah, that was the rule. That’s why at the start of the clip, you can see us saying:

 

“One meter! One meter!”

 

Graham Connolly: And it was this policy of pushing as well. To push them back! It was not to strike. It was to push back. And that’s because we’ll be arrested immediately if we engage in violence.

 

[35:23]

 

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, if they’re in the danger zone, push them. So Tom explains this to everyone.

 

All right, we’re going in a blob. So we emerge from the bridge, they’re on the far-left side of the bridge. I’m leading them, not the march, but I’m leading the blob at this point. And I see the right footpath that we’re on the right side. It’s clear. We’ll go straight, we’ll go on the march. They’re on the Left.

 

Graham Connolly: Ignore them.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, I am always more focused on us doing our thing. I don’t really care what they ever do. We always encounter you know, but, …

 

Graham Connolly: We always say we are not anti-Antifa!

 

Tim Lutze: No, exactly.

 

Graham Connolly: We don’t exist to be anti-them. They’re anti-us!

 

 

Tim Lutze: I know the Euro bros love that saying, but I don’t like that saying. So we’re on the right side of the footpath and we’re moving. And then they just beeline it for us. And they’re on the left side and they charge across the bridge as if they were running up some sort of hill or camp or whatever. And this is at the very beginning of the morning before anything violence is kicked off. And they charge across the bridge. I couldn’t see a police in sight. So I tell the lads next to me:

 

“1 meter! 1 meter! 1 meter!”

 

I’d say it a few times. And then basically as soon as they’re within one meter, their hands are up and they start swinging!

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: And they hit fresh air. And then they hit the pavement.

 

Graham Connolly: They didn’t have a good time!

 

Tim Lutze: No. They were like headbutting our fists and our shoes! It was really weird!

 

Graham Connolly: Crazy sort of violence from them. [chuckling] Just weird violence from Antifa.

 

Tim Lutze: Really [chuckling] weird!

 

Graham Connolly: They weren’t expecting to hurt themselves.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Yes.

 

Graham Connolly: By bouncing off the NSN!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, that’s right. So, yeah, they had a crack and, …

 

Graham Connolly: And suddenly then the police, …

 

Tim Lutze: They got up and they got back in front of us and they’re like:

 

“Oh no, maybe not!”

 

And they just walked out of the way.

 

Graham Connolly: I didn’t see that in the video. Sort of came back at that point.

 

Tim Lutze: There’s only like five too.

 

Graham Connolly: I think the police realised that the violence that the communists were not going to be able to stop you guys.

 

Tim Lutze: The cops were there and they were just like:

 

“Boy, that escalated quickly!”

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I think they hoped that you were going to get stopped by these, … They couldn’t stop you, not legally, but these communists could. If the cops were over here looking the other way, …

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: And these communists could stop you, then so be it! They failed to stop you guys!

 

Tim Lutze: The other thing I noticed in the video was that when these people went down and they were incapacitated, they were left alone.

 

Graham Connolly: They were left alone. Yes.

 

Tim Lutze: No one was kicking their unconscious bodies on the floor. Like I doubt we should be so lucky if the roles are reversed.

 

Graham Connolly: Absolutely! They would stand on your head!

 

Tim Lutze: But did that stop them for the rest of the day? No! So what’s the reason that we don’t incapacitate them properly?

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! Yeah. You know what the reason is because the rules are different for us than they are for them.

 

Tim Lutze: My family, they care about me. They don’t necessarily agree with everything. But they said to me:

 

“If the police won’t stop them and the courts won’t prosecute them and all this stuff like what are you going to do? How can you stop them if the police won’t do anything?”

 

And I said the only thing that keeps them in check is the level of violence that we are capable of graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: Like that is why we train. That’s why we train! That’s why we do push ups. That’s why we punch each other in the park. The only thing that holds them back, not attacking us on site is the level of violence that we are capable of, …

 

Graham Connolly: The thing about it is what’s really embarrassing for them is that they can get destroyed by a bunch of guys that are holding back.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: That’s what’s really embarrassing for them.

 

Tim Lutze: Exactly!

 

Graham Connolly: Like this isn’t Green street hooligans. This isn’t like, you guys aren’t standing on people. You’re not trying to hospitalise cunts! You were trying to get past them. You’re trying to move them aside, basically. Like the NSN used, in a funny way, the minimum amount of violence required to back them off!

 

Tim Lutze: There was probably 50 people in black and we are only enough numbers were used to, …

 

Graham Connolly: You can see in the videos most of the guys are just standing watching. They are not doing anything!

 

Tim Lutze: And that’s something that we’ve practiced to hold the ranks and stuff.

 

Graham Connolly: Discipline! Yeah.

 

[36:36]

 

 

Tim Lutze: Not so that one person’s attacked and the whole rank just falls apart.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, exactly! Yeah, it was disciplined.

 

Tim Lutze: We’re not a bunch of hooligans that go around bashing people! Like there was a lot of self control in that.

 

Graham Connolly: A lot of self control.

 

Tim Lutze: That people, like the authorities should respect.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, but they don’t!

 

Tim Lutze: They don’t. But they should respect the amount of violence we are capable of, and the amount of violence we only use, …

 

Graham Connolly: The minimum amount.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: The minimum amount to be allowed to walk where you guys are entitled to walk!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: Which is along the street and to join this rally that was planned, largely by NSN!

 

Tim Lutze: And yeah, as soon as that happened. My daughter was in the crowd and she said as soon as people from that end of the rally seen the fight happened and seen us just walk over them like they’re nothing, the whispers went through the crowd like a wave. And they’re just like:

 

“The NSN are here! The NSN are here!”

 

And everyone just turned and we looked at them and we’re walking in and everyone’s high fiving!

 

Graham Connolly: There’s a video of that too. You guys arrive and have been high fived by all the crowd and everybody, …

 

Tim Lutze: People coming up, getting photos with Sewell!

 

Graham Connolly: And it certainly felt like a moment, a shift in, like this optics thing that the media have tried to sell that:

 

“Everybody hates us! That we are evil. That we are this, that and the other!”

 

And then that video dispels all of that.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: You guys kick your way across the bridge. Punch your way across the bridge and then get high fived by the crowd when you arrive! And the similar thing happened in Sydney without the violence, but they got cheered on arrival. Boys got cheered on arrival.

 

Tim Lutze: So, the exact thing that Tom, myself and eight other people are accused of, as it stands now, is exactly what happened at the very beginning of the day from the Left.

 

Graham Connolly: And have any of these Leftists been charged? Do we know?

 

Tim Lutze: No, they will never be charged.

 

Graham Connolly: They will never be charged!

 

Tim Lutze: And you can highlight all the contradictions you want, but obviously, …

 

Graham Connolly: It won’t make any difference.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: Like I said, my family home, we were attacked in the middle of the night. And where does it escalate from there?

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

 

Tim Lutze: Where does it escalate from terrorism? Where does it escalate from violent disorder with padded gloves and masks?

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: Are they waiting for a nationalist to die?

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Tim Lutze: And then, even then, …

 

Graham Connolly: In fact, these very same people have been seen in a video that came out today attacking cars on the September 13th rally that we didn’t actually go to, that one!

 

Tim Lutze: So just to recap the 31st March for Australia. The level of violence that we’re accused of doing, all the other accusations against us, the exact thing happened at the beginning of the day! If the police had dealt with it then and there. If the police had kept the peace and done their job, then and there, then maybe no other violence would happen throughout the day. But that wasn’t the case.

 

Graham Connolly: No, that wasn’t the case.

 

Tim Lutze: That wasn’t the last time that they attacked someone. Anyone that would stray down a laneway or anywhere away from the march was attacked on sight!

 

Graham Connolly: Didn’t matter if they were NSN or not!

 

Tim Lutze: It didn’t matter. They were elderly men attacked. And there’s a video of one that had his ribs cracked and he’s in the group and they ripped his jumper off him and he had an Australian T-shirt. They ripped that off him. You know, he looked close to 60 years old. He’s bleeding.

 

Graham Connolly: They’re cowards! And you don’t see NSN going around bashing communists.

 

Tim Lutze: No.

 

Graham Connolly: And like communist grannies and granddads and, …

 

Tim Lutze: So the next thing thing that happened was Avi [Yemini] * was there and he was going through the crowd trying to find anyone he can and say:

 

“What do you think about Nazis being here? What do you think about, … Is this a racist march?”

 

You know, provoking! And so Tom went up to him and told him to leave, and his security got violent. They were eventually moved on and he hid in a little area with the other reporters and he surrounded himself with women. And so and then he’d continue to provoke the guys from the side.

 

So I went over to deal with it. And he’s asking me questions and so I said:

 

“What’s the question? All right? We’re here for a march to stop immigration. You either support that or you don’t support it. It’s not an anti-Nazi march. It’s not an anti-racist march. It’s a stop immigration march! If you’re not here to stop immigration, leave!”

 

[* Avraham Shalom Yemini is an Australian-Israeli far-Right provocateur and commentator. Since 2020 he has worked as the Australian correspondent for Rebel News, a Canadian jewish far-Right website. Wikipedia]

 

[44:15]

 

 

Graham Connolly: I think it’s funny about, … You can just tell the whole story about Avi, but the last time we encountered Avi was at another one of our protests.

 

Tim Lutze: The anti-immigration rally.

 

Graham Connolly: Yes, exactly! It was Living Space for Whites, was it?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. Two years before.

 

Graham Connolly: Living Space for Whites was our, … Oh, yeah, stopping immigration. And as we left, Avi came over and he interviewed Tom.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: At one point in that interview, Avi gloated, … Now, we were grown. We might have had 20 guys at the one before that, and this one, we had maybe 30 guys, but he was gloating that, or the lie that he was trying to get across is that:

 

“Why have you got the same amount of guys you had last, now?”

 

We didn’t have the same amount of guys. We had more, but he was trying because it was from 22 to, say, 30 or 28. It’s not a huge amount of growth. So his whole entire little dig in that interview was:

 

“Why aren’t you growing? How come you’re not growing?”

 

Tim Lutze: That rally was smashed and broken up an hour and a half early, too.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah:

 

“Why are you the same 25 guys? Why are you the same number? Why aren’t you growing? Why aren’t you growing?”

 

Tim Lutze: He was obsessed with the young lads wearing shorts. But that was really weird!

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, he was exactly.

 

Tim Lutze: He brought that up a couple times.

 

Graham Connolly: What’s he thinking now? He just seen 150 of us march through the centre of Melbourne. He just seen 150 of us march to the centre of Melbourne three weeks ago at our nationals with Tom at the front of it. 150 men with our drums. And then three weeks later March for Australia, where Tom gets to speak on the steps of Parliament. Keynote speaker. Thousands upon thousands of cheering patriots!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah.

 

Graham Connolly: How’s Avi feel now about our 25 people?

 

Tim Lutze: He’ll cope and he’ll see, …

 

Graham Connolly: He’ll cope. But he knows!

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. I just told him what the march was about. And then they were like:

 

“Oh, there’s women around here.”

 

And I said:

 

“Well, don’t provoke.”

 

Graham Connolly: Don’t provoke.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah don’t provoke.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep. But that’s what he does. That’s his job. He’s a provocateur.

 

Tim Lutze: And he provoked at the Christian rally that, like Joel Davis and some of the young guys attended the other day, and he managed to get them booted. And that’s the last time we go in plain clothes to an event and support somebody.

 

Graham Connolly: Yep.

 

Graham Connolly: And Patterson cucked to Avi!

 

Tim Lutze: Mate, Nick Patterson is a piece of work to say the least!

 

Graham Connolly: Isn’t he?

 

Tim Lutze: And yeah, if Nick Patterson didn’t, …

 

Graham Connolly: Didn’t he speak to us at the Workers Light [sp], one of the workers spoke to us like, …

 

Tim Lutze: Talked about him training and his son training.

 

Graham Connolly: And then cucked to Avi like that. The way he bent over for Avi like that.

 

Tim Lutze: And then the guy whose main brand is fighting the corrupt police calls the police over to eject guys standing there quietly. Yeah he’s just a real piece of work.

 

Graham Connolly: Real piece of work, man! No honour. There’s no honour in that kind of behaviour.

 

Tim Lutze: And yeah, he’s not welcome at any of our rallies. He’ll be ejected if he comes. And if he has an issue about that, we can box if he wants.

 

Graham Connolly: You’d like to spar with him?

 

Tim Lutze: Oh, yeah, we can box. We can do a box of charity.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah, nice. Can he choose the charity? Probably go to some, …

 

Tim Lutze: I’ll go to some “Vionists”. Yeah, it’ll go to some Zionists, …

 

Graham Connolly: Some jews for refugees.

 

Tim Lutze: But yeah, if we win the money, it’ll go to White Australia.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah. He’ll never agree!

 

Tim Lutze: No, he won’t agree. He’s too soft.

 

But yeah, so Avi was the next big thing and that was dealt with and he actually didn’t go on the march. He stayed in that little corner the whole time and tried to find whoever he could to say that they weren’t racist. I think he found some Africans and, …

 

Graham Connolly: Now he spent weeks trying to reframe the day. Unsuccessfully, I would say. He’s tried to reframe to support anything he had that day.

 

Tim Lutze: But he can’t reframe it!

 

Tim Lutze: Oh, Thomas’s speech.

 

Graham Connolly: Exactly! Anyone who wants to just look up Thomas’s speech. So watch the video of the boys arriving at the event. Watch the fight of them having to kick their way through Antifa. Punch their way through Antifa and then make their way across to the high fives and cheers of the crowd.

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. The crowd were working behind the banner, behind the black block.

 

[48:44]

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: And that wasn’t, …

 

Graham Connolly: Tell the story about how the police tried to stop you guys getting, or how they tried to prevent you guys getting to Parliament steps that day.

 

Tim Lutze: I wouldn’t say they prevented us from getting there, but on our way to Parliament there were a few blockades by Leftists and they would come up and reach for the banner, and they were swiftly dealt with by “crowd controllers”, let’s say. And yeah, there were probably a few instances of that. There was an instance where they came down one of the streets and just started swinging again. They would attack anyone carrying an Australian flag indiscriminately. And I was standing on the steps while the PA was being set up and the stage was being set up and I was trying to keep people off the steps, just because I was sort of blocking the speakers and stuff, the sound.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

 

Tim Lutze: And an old man came up to me and he, his nose was split across and he had black eyes and I could almost see his nostrils through the top of his nose here. And he walks up to me and he was shaken and said that he sort of walked off to the side for a smoke or something and he was just set upon, and they just beat him into the ground. And I just said to him:

 

“Look, mate, you’re in shock, sit down.”

 

And then there was a lady nearby that got him water. And the cop sort of came up and like asked me:

 

“Is he all right?”

 

And I said:

 

“Like, why do you think he didn’t come to you? Yeah, why did he come to the guy in the black jacket?”

 

You know, basically like:

 

“Piss off!”

 

Graham Connolly: Well, here’s the other thing. Like we said earlier.

 

Tim Lutze: And this was some, …

 

Graham Connolly: Like we said earlier. You think anyone was arrested for that?

 

Tim Lutze: No!

 

Graham Connolly: And you think you can split a man’s nose wide open like that in Melbourne and not be seen?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah. And so, …

 

Graham Connolly: So why does this other side never get arrested?

 

Tim Lutze: Yeah, exactly!

 

Graham Connolly: So is it State sanctioned? Is it State sanctioned violence?

 

Tim Lutze: They seem to get arrested when they interrupt like when they go really hard at like the Arms Exhibition [Arms Fair in Melbourne on September 11, 2024], whatever. It’s kind of like government stuff.

 

Graham Connolly: Yeah.