Henrik Palgren: And welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for tuning in here. I’m Henrik. Glad to have you with us here on Red Ice today. If watching live on Rumble X Twitter, Red Ice TV, Red Ice members, however you’re tuning in, thank you for being here.

 

So, yes, we obviously are going to follow up on the topic we covered a little bit yesterday in terms of the shooting down at Bondi beach in Australia. We have Thomas Sewell back on the show today to cover this. Not only, of course, what’s happened with the shooting, the potential political fallout from this, but there’s other issues, of course, happening. It is interesting, though, because this has been called basically “an intelligence failure” by the Australian, you know, intelligence services, ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organization], I think it’s shortened. As and they’ve been observing obviously the National Socialists, all the Nationalists in Australia, they’re the ones kind of under scrutiny. They’re the ones being investigated, they’re the ones being followed around, arrested, all these things, right?

 

And then you have this blatant, kind of hole here. We will get into whether or not this is intentional. Did they drop the guard? What’s really happening? I have a lot of questions, as always. As you should, I think, which is healthy around these events and how it’s being used.

 

But it’s clear just on the official level, if you look at it, what they’re saying that this is. Obviously this is a massive failure then in the sense of not observing the actual terrorists in the country like this. Well, first of all, he was Pakistani. Then they’re coming back and saying now he was originally born in India, but who cares? What’s the difference? Right? So, Tom Sewell, welcome back. Good to see you again. How are you?

 

Thomas Sewell: Good, thanks. Thank you for having me on the show again. And yes, it’s been eventful as always. There’s plenty to talk about and very exciting times ahead. A lot of controversy. Did you want to start with Bondi first?

 

Henrik Palgren: I think. So why don’t we clear, well, it’s not just clearing it off the plate. It’s such a big thing. It’s really the main story we should lead with here, obviously. I’m not sure we have to reiterate it, but obviously, yes, we had a shooting on the 14th Australian time then. So it’s on the 14th, December 14th. And obviously, yeah, just explain what you, what your initial kind of, I guess, you know, way that you view this is not strange. We knew that this is like “part and parcel” now of being in a multicultural, multiracial country like Australia has been turned into against all of our desires. But still, were you surprised by this?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, absolutely not! And myself and most of the leadership of the organization have commented that we’re surprised that it doesn’t happen more often and that it took this long considering the rhetoric we’ve experienced from Muslims in Australia over the past couple years.

 

And I’m not just talking about rhetoric in terms of the Palestinian protests in the city every week. I’m talking about just everyday Muslims that you might come across on job sites or if you train at a commercial gym, whether it be a fighting gym, or a lifting gym. The rhetoric out of Muslims has been very extreme! Like we would call it Fed postie. We don’t get away with that kind of rhetoric.

 

But it’s just commonplace within the Muslim community to sort of talk about and advocate for this sort of stuff. So yeah. Where do you want to go with this? I can go into more detail.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, so we talked about it yesterday a little bit as well, obviously of the shooters and everything else. And first of all, do you trust what you’re hearing from the police and the mainstream government sources on this?

 

[04:04]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I don’t. As a general rule, I don’t trust the police and the mainstream media. But this is something that’s too big to fool.

 

I mean, there were thousands, … I mean, there’s a lot of Americans sharing kind of schizophrenic conspiracy theories about it. There’s a few odd videos that I do admit there’s a few videos that look, the guy was probably just missing his shots. I don’t think he was shooting blanks. There’s a whole bunch of schizo theories out there. Most people don’t know how populated Bondi [pronounced bond-eye] beach is in Sydney, Australia.

 

So most Americans, they can’t fathom that this happened at the most populated place in Sydney, like almost more populated than the CBD. If you’ve ever been a Bondi beach, there are just potentially tens of thousands of people there are thousands and thousands of witnesses. Yeah, I really dislike the way that so many people on the dissonant right are trying to transmute this into some sort of conspiracy theory. Sometimes Muslims just kill people!

 

Henrik Palgren: So strange1 No!

 

Thomas Sewell: And in this case, they very obviously targeted a jewish event. A predominantly jewish. Well, not a predominantly jewish event. A jewish event that had maybe a couple hundred people attend. But again, it was at a beach where there’s tens of thousands of Aussies and tourists.

 

I mean, I’ve parked my car literally by that bridge. Like, when I’ve gone to Sydney, I’ve visited Bondi Beach, I don’t know every second time that I’ve gone to Sydney, so probably 20 or 30 times over my life. And I’ve parked my car at that very spot. I know exactly where that is. You know, where that big, surf house is, the big clubhouse there. You have lunch just on the other side of the road from that shooting.

 

So it was recognizable immediately. The reaction from the police was to be expected. It was typical. I mean, seeing the police just take so long to react, that’s pretty common in Australia. If you’re a White nationalist, they’ll pull the gun out on you like the millisecond. [chuckling] I think they rev themselves up when they come to your house. I think the police in Australia are a bit different to the police in America. They’re not sort of combat aware, they’re not psychologically trained to deal with these sort of scenarios.

 

Whereas I think in America the threat level of gun violence is so high, or at least they’re trained to expect a high level of gun violence. Whereas in Australia, the police don’t have any balls unless they’ve got like two hours to psychologically prepare for kicking your door in. Because every time I’ve had issues with police, you know, there’ll be 10 or 20 of them and they already have the guns out and they’re ready to shoot you while you’re trying to answer your door.

 

But when there’s an actual active shooter situation, I mean, they’re just hiding behind cars and you saw like two of the female police officers have mental breakdowns. It was just really embarrassing.

 

What else? I mean, yeah, my understanding was that, sorry, I’ll let you go. There’s so much to cover.

 

Henrik Palgren: So of course we had Arsen Ostrovsky coming out early. And of course this is one of the reasons why I had questions about it I mean, he literally came to Australia. He said in the clip here we could play it in a moment, but like three weeks ago to fight anti-semitism, and this was heightened. The whole jewish community has allegedly like, warned that this was going to happen. There was a number of posts from the Australian jewish Association. They were talking about this was very foreseeable and stuff like that. And of course I’m gonna say:

 

“Yeah, they’re probably right.”

 

Because they’re knowing what’s happening here. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s very foreseeable because you have an ongoing war between Zionists and I guess just jews in general and the Palestinians in the Middle East. And they’re killing, I don’t know, somewhere between 10 and 100 Arabs a day over in the Middle East. And the way most people’s brains work, and especially the way Arabs brains work is. Yeah, they don’t recognize borders, they don’t care. And these weren’t even Arabs, technically, this father and son team. I guess they were Arabs in the sense of what etymologically the word Arab means, which is mixed. They’re a mixed population. They’re a mongrel population.

 

But I believe these two were half Indian, half Italian.

 

Henrik Palgren: Really?

 

Thomas Sewell: And yes. Yeah. So the father is an Indian national and the son was born in Australia to an Indian father and I believe an Italian mother. So he’s mixed race, and he’s converted to Islam, which is what Islam is. It’s a mongrel rape gang. It’s where all the mongrels go and convert and join the big brown alliance gang together. And he received a little bit of training in the Philippines, so he probably went over to the Philippines to not just do military training, but also to probably get a blessing from ISIS, because there is an ISIS cell in the Philippines.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s what the Intel is saying is that this guy was on a watch list from 2019 or 2020 that ASIO were keeping an eye on him because of obviously what he was posting on the Internet and the mosque that he was hanging out at. So he was actually a junior scholar at one of the more further down the line Sunni mosques here in Sydney. And he was not an imam or anything like that. Not highly trained, but he’s obviously gone through to religiously study Islam. He’s not just like a Friday Muslim that’s just casually gone down there. He has actually completed like his basic diplomas in understanding Islamic studies. And clearly he’s educated in Islam enough to know that if you want your 72 virgins, you got to go kill jews.

 

So he completed his education with that act. You could say if you understand Islam. And his father, I don’t know much about the father, but I do know that he’s an Indian national.

 

[10:39]

 

Henrik Palgren: The father was killed.

 

Thomas Sewell: The father was killed. The son just came out of the coma, just today. The news was saying just today he’s awoken from his coma.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay. Yeah, because you saw random other Aussies attacking the crew there on the bridge obviously too. And the police couldn’t, like, they didn’t know what was going on. They didn’t have any control of the situation. And guys were just moving in. They were even going after another random brown guy, … They were like these White Aussies, … [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: The footage I saw was that the first guy on the bridge to try to disarm them was a brown guy. And the one of the cops shot at him while he had his hands up.

 

Henrik Palgren: Wow!

 

Thomas Sewell: And then a whole bunch of Aussies jumped the bridge and tried to attack. Yeah, this is the footage here. So a bunch of Aussies are attacking because he’s wearing a black Tshirt.

 

So it’s like an Arab in a black Tshirt. And so people obviously thought that was the same guy, but he was actually the first to run up there to be a hero and then the next two Aussies that went up there to also be heroes. That’s one thing that’s interesting is you’ve got female cops literally hiding behind cars and having mental breakdowns. And you’ve got Baz here with his shirt off, two other Aussies and an Arab guy running up there hero style, unarmed to try to tackle these guys and disarm them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And you’ve also got, I think earlier you had that old jewish, … Oh no, he wasn’t jewish, he was a Coptic Christian. I think old Coptic Christian guy, another Arab, attack him and take the shotgun off him, but not shoot him because apparently the shotgun was out of ammunition and then he ended up getting shot I think in the arm.

 

So it’s a chaotic situation obviously. There’s nothing suspicious about it in my opinion. I think that we should really focus on the principle that we need to be a sovereign country here in Australia. And this incident is caused by the fact that we have warring tribes in our nation! And the fault of this is the government for allowing the jews and allowing Muslims into our country when they have no place! They have no place in our country. And it doesn’t matter whether one is the victim and one is the attacker. This is caused by inter-ethnic or inter-religious conflict overseas and these problems are here. And I would have the same opinion if it was any group of people. But I especially have this opinion when it’s non-White people, when it’s brown people or desert people that are killing each other. We just don’t want these dramas here.

 

And this is the result of not just multiculturalism, but it’s also, yeah, the result of having a very powerful jewish lobby in this country. I mean this jewish event, these weren’t nobody jews. These were actual serious Zionists, they were serious jewish leaders.

 

And I think it’s a very fair assumption to make based off the full 10 minute footage that I’ve seen that these two went down there, these two Indian Muslims went down there with the intention to kill as many jews as possible. And I think that they also wounded about 40 other people.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, right.

 

Thomas Sewell: And we don’t have the full list of names of all the people killed and wounded, although at least half of the names of those killed have been released already. And they appear, I think 11 out of the 12 that we have the names of do appear to be jewish. There’s one name there that appears to be potentially, … Is that one is that, …

 

Henrik Palgren: That guy, Peter Meagher. He was there as a freelance photographer to actually shoot some photos for the Hanukkah party, I believe. But that’s one White guy.

 

I was looking at the bridge, and you can see. I mean, again, I don’t know what the like, how big was the field that the jews were in at the Hanukkah event there. But he fires this way, this way, that way. It looked like he was just shooting, like, everywhere on the beach that he basically could. That’s what it looked like to me. So first I was just kind of like:

 

“Was it a coincidence?”

 

You know, because that could happen. But I don’t know. Maybe it was publicly announced or something.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was a publicly announced event.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: By one of the, I think it’s a Chabad. I don’t know if I’m pronouncing it right.

 

Henrik Palgren: Chabad. All in there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It was a publicly announced event, and it’s very obvious. Again, I don’t have any more information than the media have already put out, but I think based on the Facebook posts of this, I mean, one of the jews that was killed was a pretty serious rabbi that had just gone back from Israel, and he was signing munitions over in Israel.

 

[15:32]

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, look, it was an international event. There were jews from France there, there was at least a couple from Israel, I think, and, of course, Arsen Ostrovsky was one of them. And, it’s a different mindset. Right. Like, if I’d be in a situation like this. I’d be like. I wouldn’t take a selfie at that point. I wouldn’t kind of push so hard politically.

 

But then you realize that’s how motivated these people are, that if these pieces lined up the way that they did and he just happens to be there, what is it? A human rights lawyer out of Israel or whatever to fight anti-semitism in Australia, he happens to find themselves there again, you can have questions about it, I think, but you don’t have to go into conspiracy.

 

But the point is, this is how they’re thinking. That’s what I want to say, Tom. If this happens, it’s immediately use it!:

 

“Like, second one, boom! Let’s go! Propaganda, push our issues!”

 

That’s what happens.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, look, I got a few things to say on that.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: When Carl Rittenhouse shot into a group of Antifa. When he was getting attacked, he took out two pedophiles.

 

So when you, not randomly, but when you’re getting attacked by Antifa, and if you take down two of them, there’s a strong chance that they’re a pedophile, that they’re a sex offender. And I don’t think it’s suspicious that two Muslims planned a terror attack to kill a bunch of jews. And it happened to be, out of the couple hundred jews that were there, there happened to be human rights lawyers and like, huge Zionist advocates. And I think you’d find it in a crowd of two or three hundred jews, especially, … And these weren’t secular jews. That’s an important point, is this wasn’t a secular jewish meeting. This wasn’t like:

 

“Hey, jews, come to the park and hang out!”

 

These were jews from the local synagogue in Bondi. And Bondi is a relatively jewish area. So it’s a touristy area, and it has a huge amount of rich White people that live there, but there’s also quite a large jewish population there. There’s, like a jewish enclave there, a wealthy jewish enclave there.

 

So there are some synagogues in Bondi, and this was one of the local synagogues that organized this. And they’re like:

 

“Yep, let’s do our thing down at the beach.”

 

So, yeah, there’s really nothing suspicious about this except there’s one video of the old man missing, like, three or four shots. And I mean, I don’t think that’s overly suspicious. I mean, it’s at close range, but, I mean, adrenaline, who knows?

 

Henrik Palgren: Right? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I haven’t seen anything other than that one video of him missing three shots. Like what? Yeah, it’s not Call of Duty. There’s just a lot of firearms experts on the Internet. There’s a lot of people that are just really quick to call:

 

“Oh, it’s Mossad! It’s Mossad! It’s Mossad!”

 

And it’s like, no, sometimes Muslims just kill people. And we have a really bad, you know, sort of subculture, I think, within the broader spectrum of White nationalism and dissident politics, where:

 

“Everything’s a conspiracy! And everything is like Mossad’s behind everything! There’s Mossad in your skirting board listening to you!”

 

And it’s like, this is just paranoia. Sometimes it’s just an actual terrorist attack. Now, if I’m presented with evidence that there was a Mossad connection, but all I’ve seen is AI, fake edits. Yeah, just Photoshop. I’ve just seen garbage! I’ve just seen the most low rent garbage! Psyop! You know, the real psyop is people thinking everything’s Mossad. I think that’s the real Mossad psyop.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, interesting point. Yeah. No, I’m not the one who immediately that’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Did you see Baz? That’s what put him in the coma.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I figured. Right. Because I’m not sure if the other guy there, he, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Sorry. No, no, that’s the wrong one. No, no, sorry. It was a different head stomp. There was a different guy that kicked. So Baz kicked the father, old man in the head, but another younger guy, a fitter younger guy with tattoos, kicked the other one in the head.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So before this footage.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, so okay, so moving on from whether:

 

“This was it a planned event! They knew it was going to happen. They knew the worst cops that day was, … They were running the shift then, these females. Because then you have mass impact.”

 

Okay, putting that to the side for now. It is what it is. We’re just looking at it for what it is. It’s then you come back to the official, you know, world in terms of the failure of the police, of the intelligence services. And the point of priority too, right? Because there is a kind of a, there’s blame here.

 

Like as much resources and effort and time and ultimately then money and manpower is being spent on you and on your group and people around you. Joel [Davis] and [Jacob] Hersant, all these people around there to monitor you and to arrest you and keep an eye on you and spy on you go to the park to box and then there they are. They have men assigned to just watching you guys. Right? That kind of stuff.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Is this gonna force them to get their act together? Are they going to start taking the Muslim issues seriously? Is it going to be enough pressure from the jewish community that then that’s when they listen, right? When jews are murdered now they’re going to actually do something about this. What do you think they’re going to happen here, the next stage in this?

 

[21:01]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: In theory, you’re correct. In theory, when jews are affected, then you’ll see genuine pressure against Muslims. But what you’ll find is the jews are experts at transmuting any anti-Islamic energy into just being energy around anti-semitism in general. And you can already see the Labor Party for those that aren’t aware in America, the Labor Party here in Australia is kind of like our version of the Democrat Party. It’s the center-Left, so-called center-Left party. And you’ve got Tony Burke who’s the sort of, he heads the State Department. I think he’s the Home Affairs Minister. You’ve got the Prime Minister Albanese and you’ve got another guy who I’ve never seen on TV before, which is funny, they keep him hidden from TV. I think he’s the Defense Minister. His name is I think Murphy, and he is the gayest I have ever seen on Australian television. No, not Murphy. Marles. His name is Marles.*

 

[*The minister for defence is the minister of state of the Commonwealth of Australia charged with overseeing the organization, implementation, and formulation of strategic policy in defence and military matters as the head of the Department of Defence. The minister for defence is responsible for the Australian Defence Organization, including the Australian Defence Force (ADF). The current defence minister is Richard Marles, who is also concurrently serving as deputy prime minister of Australia, having been selected by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in May 2022 following the 2022 Australian federal election.]

 

And all three of them senior Labor Party guys, they are just getting roasted at the moment for their failure. And they are basically trying to transmute and put the blame back onto Nazis saying:

 

“Well, our government has done the most to shut down hate speech. Our government has done the most to stop anti-semitism. Our government banned the Nazi salute. Our government has been going after these neo-Nazis!”

 

And on several occasions journalists have cut them off and have said:

 

“Hang on a minute, what are you going to do about these Muslims?”

 

Because obviously even though the media are very controlled in their nature, it’s really hard for the media to hold the party line together that the Labor Party are trying to hold together, which is “that this is a broad stroke anti-semitism issue” and then transmute it from broad smoke, broad stroke anti-semitism onto:

 

“Look how much we’ve done to stop Nazis!”

 

And the mainstream media even covered the deportation of Matthew Gruter after [before] this terrorist attack. So those that don’t know who Matthew Gruter is, he’s a member of our organization. He was a South African national that was here on a work Visa who attended an “expose jewish power” rally. I think it was “Abolish the jewish Lobby” rally. And he was doxed and deported. He was raided within, I think a day or two of him being doxed and he was put in a camp and then deported from that camp.

 

And so look, there’s nothing, the Australian government’s got no issues with putting people in camps and deporting them, which is interesting. And the media even mentioned:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this guy didn’t break any law and he was deported.”

 

And yet this son and this father were both, … Yeah, you’ve got the old video there.

 

So there’s a new video where they actually started talking about him in reference to the fact that these two terrorists had traveled in and out of the country on several occasions to potentially receive military training.

 

And so you have people that are on a watch list for being involved with the Islamic State and training with the Islamic State and they own firearms. That’s another important point.

 

So this is Tony Burke. This is one of the faggots that personally had Matthew Gruter deported. He’s going to be deported to the Congo. We’re going to make sure that this faggot here, Tony Burke, is deported to the Congo. And that’s Penny Wong, the Chinese foreign minister.

 

Henrik Palgren: What could go wrong! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: But, yeah, Wong! Yeah. A former Australian Prime Minister:

 

“Two Wongs don’t make a White!”

 

Like back in the 50s or 60s, I think it was Harold Holt, or whoever came after him said:

 

“Two Wongs don’t make a White!”

 

Back then we were based and someone tried to bring their Asian war bride over from the Korean War and they denied access to the war bride or maybe they snuck her into the country. And then they were basically trying. They were trying to deport like, the one brown person that had been let into [chuckling] the country that year! And yeah, the prime minister said something like “two Wongs don’t make a White” when the media asked him why he was being deported. And even though technically be one Wong.

 

But anyway, yeah, so where was I going? I mean, it’s just they’re trying to obviously transmute this atrocity or this terrorist attack into being another battering ram against White Australia, against Neo-Nazis, against anti-semitism in general. What can they do? I don’t think they can do much except hot air. They’re not going to be able to change the laws in any way that’s going to be able to stop us from operating.

 

The way that the Labour Party has reacted to this has caused a huge amount of mainstream media condemnation. I mean, the mainstream media even played on national television, these Labor Party MPs, both state and federal MPs, rocking up to press conferences and getting booed by the public and getting booed by the jewish community.

 

So that’s very rare! They don’t usually show that on television. So the Labor Party is definitely just getting smashed at the moment.

 

But again, it’s that usual trick of “jew Left and jew Right”. And what they’re doing is they’re now really promoting the Liberal Party as being the only party that’s going to save the jews, and the Labor Party doesn’t have the balls to save the jews. And there’s a lot of layers to that.

 

So for example, the reason why these senior Labor Party like the Prime Minister, the Defense Minister and the Home affairs minister, the reason why they won’t call out the Muslims and why they’re trying to deflect it onto neo-Nazis is because the Labor Party can’t get elected into office without the Muslim vote and without the Indian vote. And these two were both Muslim and Indian!

 

[27:00]

 

So they don’t want to talk about the fact that he was an Indian national and he should have been deported. Obviously we shouldn’t have any Indians in the country. But even by their own metrics and by their own standards of fit and proper person checks, which is another important thing to bring up, is that it is quite hard to get a gun license in Australia if you’re a political dissident. It is not hard to get a gun license. The way that Australian gun laws work. Because I know Americans love saying:

 

“You guys gave up your guns. You, Australia doesn’t have any guns!”

 

That’s not true at all! And that’s just like what we don’t have is civilian access to military style firearms like semi-autos. Yeah, we don’t have access to semi-autos unless there’s a caveat to that, which is unless you’re what’s called a primary producer, or a professional hunter.

 

So if you have a contract, even if it’s just as low as like, I don’t know, $5,000 a year to contract shoot on people’s property, to shoot pests. Even if those pests are like foxes or something, or rabbits. You can get access to an AR15 in this country.

 

So it’s not true that we don’t have guns in this country. We have quite high gun ownership as a nation. And to get a CatAB which is basically rim fires and center fires, but in bolt action or pump. So we can get pump and bolt action. Like the rifle that this terrorist was using is called a Cat B rifle.

 

So what that means is it’s a bolt action rifle, it’s center fired, high powered and there’s not even a magazine capacity on it. Usually when you buy the rifles they come with a five or ten round magazine. It’s not actually illegal to own larger magazines. It doesn’t look good when the police come to inspect your safe. Which again, if you’re not a political dissident. It will very rarely happen. Most licensed firearm owners might only get a safe inspection once every five or 10 years. And it’ll just be two local cops. They’ll knock on your door, they’ll usually call you 24 hours beforehand and they’ll say

 

“Hi, I’m Sergeant so and so from the local police station, I need to come check your guns. I’ll be there tomorrow at nine o’ clock in the morning.”

 

And then you obviously make sure you’ve got all your shit squared away. They rock up to your house, they knock on your door, you let the two cops in, they have a look at your safe, they talk to you about what the weather’s doing and you know, how the Labor Party’s gay and try to be a friend and then they leave. And that’s basically what the local firearm section of the cops do. Because they know that every gun owner is all the vast, vast majority of gun owners are Right-wing and they’re just patriots, but they don’t have any views outside of just very common sense, low level patriotism and gun ownership or libertarianism. And there’s really very little dramas there.

 

So you can get that rifle that he’s shooting there, you can get that by just going down to the police station, filling out some paperwork, doing a one day course on firearm safety and then applying to become a member of any gun club or getting a Crown hunting permit. So a permit to hunt on Crown land.

 

Henrik Palgren: Do you have to be a member of a gun club?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Same as Sweden, basically.

 

Thomas Sewell: You can’t own a rifle in Australia for the purpose of self defense.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: You have to either you either own it because you target shoot at a gun club or you own it because you go hunting on Crown land. And all you need to do is, I think to hunt on Crown land, I think you pay 50 bucks a year or something. I used to be a licensed and registered gun owner. Obviously when I got involved in dissident politics I sold my guns and transferred them into other people’s names, just so that I didn’t have any ownership of guns. Because I could predict that they would use that as an opportunity to raid my house. And I’d heard of people that were involved in dissident politics, they went from never having a gun safe inspection to having like multiple gun safe inspections per year. And it was never just the two local cops. There would be two local cops that would come down and they’d have a weird look on their face like:

 

“Oh, hi!”

 

And they would rock up unannounced. That was another thing. Whereas normally they would always call you. And they would have six guys in suits, you know, rock up with them.

 

And it’s like:

 

“Oh, who are these people? What?”

 

And they’re just like:

 

“Oh, we’re just here for the gun inspection. Oh, what police station are you from? Oh, we’re from the city. Oh, what are you doing here? Oh, we’re just having a look.”

 

And then they’re not looking at your guns, what they’re doing. The two cops are looking at your guns, making sure that it’s all stored properly.

 

The other six cops are walking through your house, going through your drawers because they’re the STASI* and they’re going through your bookshelf, they’re going through your drawers, they’re going through your cupboards. And until you tell them to stop and get out of your house, they’ll go through everything. They might even ask if they can go through your phone.

 

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

 

And if you’re an idiot, you’d be like:

 

“Oh, okay.”

 

So there’s a lot of naive people that get screwed over.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: But yeah, I’ve never seen anyone that’s a face doxed nationalist be allowed to keep their guns.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

[31:57]

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s when we talk about system failure, the government does not let face doxed nationalists own guns, no matter how tame you make your talking points.

 

And yet these guys they can get up to what they’re up to and at no stage do they, because the law is very subjective. We don’t have the right to own guns. What we have is what’s called a “fit and proper person” check, which is completely subjective. There’s no legal definition of that. There isn’t. I actually went to the Magistrates Court to prove I was a fit and proper person because they try to take my, … I used to be trained to be an Armor Guard. I never actually did Armor Guard work, I did unarmed security work, but I was trained to be an Armor Guard, so I could have bought a pistol if I wanted to because I was trained to be an Armor Guard and I had an a pistol license, even though I never owned a pistol and I had issues. I did a pistol shoot one time and the police called me and said:

 

“Hey, you’re not allowed to do a pistol shoot, you’re not fitting proper.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yes, I am. I have a gun license.”

 

Even though I handed my guns in and stuff. I still had my gun license. And they said:

 

“Hey, you got to go to the Magistrates Court and sort this out immediately or you’re going to get charged.”

 

And so I went down the Magistrates Court and did like, it was called like a section 109, fit and proper person thingy. And the Magistrates Court confirmed that I was in fact fit and proper. And I was like, “phew”, you know what I mean? Like, kind of wiped my brow. This is really early days when I was really early involved in politics.

 

But it was a big stress, like I was going to potentially, and I had a clean criminal record back then, so I was really stressed about having a firearms offense. But I had the court confirm I was fit and proper. And yeah, these guys should not have been able to be classed as fit and proper.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Well, that’s the thing. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Completely subjective.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, obviously. Right. Unfortunately, that’s just those other conditions now with these people in charge of the governments.

 

“Bondi terrorists given gun license after ASIO investigated son’s, …”

 

Thomas Sewell: Sorry to interrupt. It’s pronounced ‘Ay Zee Oh’.

 

Henrik Palgren: ASIO investigated son’s Islamic State links.

 

Thomas Sewell: So again, here’s another interesting thing to interrupt. Sorry.

 

But when the labor government came to power. Sorry, when they were re-elected, they. When they did all their like, banning of the Nazi salute stuff. Banned the Nazi salute, they banned the swastika, but in the same legislation they actually decriminalized the ISIS flag.

 

Henrik Palgren: Really?

 

Thomas Sewell: So the Liberal Party made the ISIS flag a terror symbol and they made it illegal. And the Labor Party changed the legislation when they came to power and banned the swastika and then decriminalized the ISIS flag. So you can own an ISIS flag in Australia, but you can’t, … Sorry. You can publicly display an ISIS flag in Australia, but you cannot publicly display a swastika.

 

Henrik Palgren: Huh, Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So that’s pretty funny. They didn’t need to do that. Like this ISIS flag was already banned and they didn’t need to touch that legislation. Why did they decriminalize it?

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, it’s a feature maybe not a bug. So I don’t know!

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s a huge Muslim voting bloc in Australia and, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Obviously you’ve got an understanding of European politics like Nordic politics. But most Americans in the dissident Right, I think they’re really blind to the Islamic issue.

 

I mean, I noticed after the Aug 31st rally which was that big March for Australia rally where I spoke in front of, I don’t know, somewhere between 20,000 and 50,000 people. You know, is it from the TRS? Is that what they’re called? The Right Stuff? Eric Striker.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: I saw Eric Striker, … Well, I was in jail, so someone mailed it to me. But while I was in jail, I got mail. And it was a screenshot of like an Eric Striker tweet saying that:

 

“I’m like a judeophile and that I love jews and that you know, I’m against Muslims because I love jews.”

 

And just crazy shit! Like, I’ve been an anti-semite, a public anti-semite for probably six or so years.

 

Henrik Palgren: You’re a proven anti-semite! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: I am [chuckling] a proven anti-semite and everything. But he was dissecting that part of my speech where I said:

 

“When the people waving the Palestinian flags and the Aboriginal flags came charging at us, we fought back.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I haven’t had a chance to clarify that on stream. That actually happened. I haven’t done a response to that, but I want people to know that actually happened.

 

And this idea that we should not fight back against Palestinians when they’re punching us in the head or communists waving Palestinian flags so that we can one struggle with them against the Zionists, that’s fucking crazy! We’re in Australia. I’m not in the Middle East. Like, I’m not picking a side on the Middle East in the Middle East. I’m picking Australia, in Australia.

 

So to be fair to the Palestinians, to be fair to the Palestinians and the Arabs to give some context to that, usually they rally every weekend in Australia, in Melbourne, in Sydney and Brisbane, there’s a big rally of Arabs every single weekend in the CBD. And it’s usually 3/4 or 7/8 Muslim, you know, Arabs and 1/4 or 1/8 communists that are trying to subvert it and control them. And what they’ve done is they’ve created a brown alliance where they’re waving Abo flags and they’re waving Palestinian flags because they’re trying to convert the Muslims to being on the side of the communists for the Aboriginal issue.

 

[37:46]

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So:

 

“We’re not anti-zionists. We’re anti-colonialists! And the Zionists are a problem because they’re colonialists. It’s not because they’re Zionists. It’s because they’re colonialists. And because they’re jewish nationalists.”

 

Which I guess is what zionism is.

 

But it’s not a specific form of anti-semitism. They’re trying to, instead of it being counter jewish or counter anti-semitism, the communist groups are trying to convert all these Arabs to the cause. Now they’ve been very unsuccessful broadly, but they have converted a small percentage.

 

And so on that day, on August 31st, the vast majority of Arabs didn’t show up. The vast majority. So normally that weekend rally, that pro-Palestine rally, is normally, as I said, 7/8 Arab, 1/8th communist. On that day it was almost the other way around. It was probably 3/4 communist, 1/4 Arab. So the vast, vast majority of Arabs. And we had leaks because we’ve got people in their group chats to keep an eye on. We had leaks from their group chats saying:

 

“We ’re not going down, this is the reason why we’re not going down, don’t attend, we’re just going to have a week off. We still care about the cause, obviously, but it’s not a good idea. We don’t want a front on confrontation with March for Australia because it doesn’t achieve what we want to achieve, which is we want Australians having sympathy for Palestine. And so if we let the March for Australia people rally this weekend and wave the Aussie flags, we should stay the hell away from them so that it doesn’t interfere with our kind of our optics.”

 

They were optics cucking. They were like:

 

“We’re not going to rally this week.”

 

And so the vast, vast majority of Arabs did not come down. They didn’t want that confrontation. But some still came down.

 

And so it’s just crazy, like, yes, and it’s similar to this Bondi incident. So the context of the Bondi incident is, did he wave away most Arabs and most White Australians? You can see in that 10 minute footage the two terrorists on several occasions wave away, the young guy at least, waved away heaps of Aussies and Arabs that were swearing at him, that were carrying on, that were getting close to them. There was a lot of people, a lot of Aussies that were coming up from the other side, not from the beach, but from the other side that were saying like:

 

“What are you doing? Stop what you’re doing!”

 

Like that kind of rhetoric. And there was a bunch of women screaming like:

 

“Oh my God, stop!”

 

Like that’s gonna help! And he was just, you could see him, he’s like waving him away. He’s like:

 

“Piss off! Go away!”

 

And a lot of the guys like having a go at him had beards, whether they were Aussies or whether they’re Arabs. So obviously he wasn’t going to shoot anyone that was like Arab looking with a beard. So he did pick his target, that’s very clear. But that doesn’t mean that White Australians weren’t shot on the day.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So again, again, I’m getting ankle bit by individuals who are saying:

 

“Oh, he put out a post about White Australians, but this was an attack on jews.”

 

And it’s like, I’m aware that it was predominantly an attack on jews and the media have been talking non-stop about jews since it happened and our responsibility is White Australians. I don’t have a responsibility for jews, I have a responsibility for White Australians.

 

So I think it’s very important that we try to retake some of that narrative because the politicians have said nothing about how this is an attack on Australians, let alone White Australians.

 

Obviously the politicians aren’t going to say this is an attack on White Australians.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: But I mean, I saw one of the opposition leaders come out with a post just today and, sorry, it was a video, and he said:

 

“This terrorist attack is an attack on the jewish community. And although it’s disrespectful to Australians this is the primary issue is that it’s an attack on the jewish community and it’s about hatred and we have to stop hatred of jews.”

 

And it’s like, hang on a minute. Disrespectful to Australians? Like there’s a little bit more than disrespectful to Australians! Yeah, I mean the idea that shooting at Australians is:

 

“It’s disrespectful, but it’s not driven by hate of Australia and Australia’s values. It’s driven by hatred of jews!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. So the call that you’ve seen then is obviously, yes, the jewish community seems to be mobilizing around, targeting Albanese and the Labor government, obviously that they want them out. I think I even heard, is it Sharri Markson* on Sky News, the jewish host there? She was talking about how Albanese had, I forget exactly what the word is. I’m paraphrasing, but it’s like “have emboldened or aided Hamas” or something in Australia. Is there any truth to that? Or is it like, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, yeah, give me your take on that.

 

* Sharri Markson (born 8 March 1984) is a Jewish Australian journalist and author. She is investigations editor at The Australian and host of the Sky News Australia program Sharri, which airs 8-9 PM Monday to Thursday. She is the winner of numerous awards in journalism, including two Walkley Awards.]

 

[42:32]

 

Thomas Sewell: The Right-wing jews in Australia are very connected obviously with the Liberal Party. And the Liberal Party has never been doing worse in the history of its existence in the Australian political spectrum.

 

So what’s happening in Australia in the last four or five years is the Liberal Party has gone from a serious contender at winning the 51% of the, not the primary vote, but the total vote. When you get all the preferencing schemes or the minor parties or the satellite parties all funnel all their votes into the Liberal Party so they can win the 51%. They went from a serious contender to that, to basically total party death. I mean the Liberal Party is on its way to becoming no longer being one of the big two. And Australian politics is fracturing on the Right.

 

And so the jews, the Zionist jews especially, are absolutely petrified that they’re losing that conservative Right, You know, the control, what’s it called? The gatekeeper. They’re losing their gate-keeping party. The “Containment Right”, sorry is the word I’m looking for. They’re losing control of the Containment Right.

 

And so the jews are shifting between One Nation which is the slightly more Right-wing party, led by a redhead lady called Pauline Hanson, who was fish and chip shop lady that said racist things about Asians and now she’s like the biggest judeophile in the country.

 

And so they’re shifting support towards One Nation and the Right-wing faction within the Liberal Party. And there is truth to the fact that the Labor Party has aided and abetted Hamas in the sense that the Labor Party gains a lot of its vote from the Muslim blocs and does everything it can to not upset the Muslims. And when this war in Palestine was going on, the Labor Party was in a very difficult situation because a lot of the people that make up the Labor Party are, … And also their main alliance, which is with the Greens, which is a very Left-wing party that’s very pro-Palestine. The Labor Party are caught between a rock and a hard place where they’re really pro-jewish but they kind of have to be anti-Israel. Similar to like the Jeremy Corbyns, …

 

Henrik Palgren: I was gonna say, it’s like UK. Even Sweden has that dynamic too with the Social Democrats. They’re extremely in with the Muslim faction and trying to bring them aboard and they’re kind of infiltrating the party and they are actually taking more power.

 

And so the kind of conservative opposition is therefore kind of forced to take an even more pro-stance. Even the Sweden, Democrats were like led into the fold of like being unofficial ties with Israel. They went to a trip over there recently and they were of course so happy about it. But just to reiterate that point. You are right that there’s a lot of people in America that don’t understand the Muslim dynamic, that they just think that Muslims are simply, … Has it been used like that? Of course! I mean, even opening the borders partially to Muslims. Right. Have been kind of a geostrategic demographic plan, if you will, right from the War on Terror with the neocons, which displaced a lot of these people. They used that as the excuse and now we have to let in Muslims.

 

So there’s a sure, there’s a functionality in that. Not every one, obviously, but some doesn’t seem to understand just how big of a problem that that is and that the Muslim organized community actually is. And they just think them as pawns of Mossad and Israeli interests essentially. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: And also the dynamic in Australia is very different to America. So in America you have predominantly a Mexican and an African problem.

 

And so you have whole suburbs taken over by Mexicans or you have whole suburbs taken over by Africans. We don’t have that in Australia. There’s no suburb in Australia that’s taken over by Mexicans and there’s very few suburbs, like there’s probably only two or three suburbs in Melbourne and maybe one or two suburbs in Sydney that are taken over by Africans. But what we do have is we have entire regions of our cities, like we’re talking 3, 4, 5, 6 suburbs at a time, taken over by Arabs. And we have huge Islamic, you know, voting blocks. We have huge Islamic organizations. The Muslims are very organized. Like I used to work in the northern suburbs just as a casual worker when I was doing the residential care. And there was a resi home in the northern suburbs and I was looking after some drug addict teenagers, and you know, taking them to play footy and stuff like that. And they were the only White kids in the whole area.

 

I mean, there was three mosques in that suburb. And I’m telling you there was probably 5,000 Muslims per mosque, all fighting age men, all fit, all healthy. It was an army. There was probably, there was like more than a division, more than a division, like a World War II size division, like probably 15,000 fighting Muslims in that one suburb.

 

And I mean, we’re talking about guys aged between 18 and 40 you know, on the steroids train at the kickboxing gym. You know, I mean, like when you talk about “tribe and train”, they were organized on another level! And so and they’re political, they’re religious, they’re not low IQ niggers running around shooting each other with guns. They’re much more intelligent. They’re probably like averaging a 95 IQ, which is in that zone where they can organize effectively in very large numbers. The Africans can’t do that. So, if there’s societal collapse, if there’s a breakdown, you’ve got potentially tens of thousands of Muslim fighters as a fifth column in your country, that’s a way bigger threat than just like the chaos and anarchy of a hundred thousand Africans just in this city.

 

So I think some Americans probably do understand it. They might live in particular areas and they might be observing what happens in Europe and our situation is closer to Europe than it is to America’s.

 

[48:41]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Right, exactly, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. With the added factor of the Chinese and the Indians. So yeah, they’re obviously less militant, but they’re equally as organized at an economic level.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, exactly! It’s a major problem. And they’re kind of there’s this alliance, as you said, between the, usually the Labor government, the Left-wing governments and the Muslim faction kind of thing.

 

So I’m very familiar with it now that’s played out in Sweden. It’s very detrimental and yeah, so basically it’s a multi-pronged attack. It’s Chinese, it’s Indians, it’s Muslims, it’s jews. It’s like everyone!

 

Thomas Sewell: Social cohesion. It’s social cohesion.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s what the so the government. I’ve never heard this word used so much in the last six months. It’s like they got the patch, like they got the software patch, they got the software update. Every media station, every politician on all sides, Liberal, Labor, all they talk about now is “social cohesion”. Every press conference, “social cohesion”.

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: Every arrest, social cohesion! Every law change they’re trying to make:

 

“We got to improve social cohesion!”

 

And you know when ASIO gets up on the TV, like Mike Burgess, when he gets up on the press releases:

 

“Social cohesion! Social cohesion! Social cohesion!”

 

It is the running meme of 2025 here in Australia is the government will not stop talking about social cohesion, which really is about public trust in the institutions, public trust in the government and the fact that we’re in a multipolar society, that guns or no guns, people are breaking away from each other and everyone is getting way more racist.

 

All people, all Whites, Indians, Muslims, Chinese people, we’re going into that mode where boundaries between suburbs are becoming more clear and White flight is becoming far more obvious. And, yeah, people are starting to stick to their own areas more, which in America you’ve probably had for a really long time. You’ve had probably that breakdown in social cohesion.

 

But here in Australia, we had this, like crazy salt and pepper multiculturalism where every suburb just had a light Dusting of high IQ, non-White people that we just stole from the Third World. But now we’ve got all the foot soldiers here. So now the social cohesion’s properly broken down now.

 

Henrik Palgren: Do you think they intend to actually use it in the way we use it, or did we have to integrate them, then better? Is that the kind of the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: No, they’re not even bothering with that’s the brilliant part of it. Their strategy is so ineffective, they’re not even bothering to talk about assimilation anymore. They gave up on assimilation about five years ago. I haven’t really heard that word used by any of the parties, except maybe One Nation. They’re probably the only one still trying to die on the hill of assimilation, which is good. I’m glad that there’s a controlled opposition in that area so that they can die on the hill of assimilation, because it won’t work.

 

Henrik Palgren: And that’s Pauline Hanson.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s Pauline Hanson.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So she’s gone from a pretty explicitly White nationalist position where it’s like her maiden speech, she said:

 

“Australia is being threatened by being flooded with Asians!”

 

And the whole mainstream media just mocked her. They didn’t argue against it. They just mocked her and said:

 

“That that’s insane! That’s ridiculous!”

 

And this is in 1996. And she was right. And now that she’s right, instead of doubling down on her position that Australia’s now flooded with Asians, she’s now got Asians and Indians in her party. And she’s saying:

 

“Oh, but these are assimilated. They’re assimilated Asians!”

 

And so she’s gone like, she’s doubling down on Civnattery and the assimilation method.

 

Whereas the Liberal Party and Labor Party. The Liberal Party has two factions. It has the Right-wing and Left-wing in it. So it’s meant to be a Right-wing party, but it’s actually been taken over by Left-wingers.

 

And I’m not just talking about the Overton Window shifting. It actually has had a coup, like an internal coup. And basically the Right-wing faction was more aligned with that One Nation rhetoric. Like they want to maintain the assimilation lie, whereas the Left-wing faction:

 

“No, that’s racist! You can’t say ‘assimilation’ because that implies that our culture is better than theirs. So they shouldn’t be assimilating into our culture.”

 

So that’s fucking awesome! That’s great news. I don’t want these people assimilating or attempting to assimilate.

 

Henrik Palgren: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: And the ones that have attempted are being outnumbered now by the ones that don’t even give a fuck and don’t have any respect for our culture and society. And so, yeah, social cohesion is at an all time low.

 

Yeah, that’s basically the situation in Australian politics. And now they’re calling for deportations, but they’re doing it in a very soft way. They basically want to try to just more of the same. They want to deport and block anti-semites coming in the country. And the rhetoric is not really around like anything like Donald Trump where he’s talking about people from shithole countries. That rhetoric is not on the menu here in Australia.

 

[53:42]

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Yep. Nope. Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Pauline Hanson’s broached it a little bit, but nowhere at the same level.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So basically the Right-wing in the United States or Donald Trump, like the MAGA camp is more Right-wing than the party that’s broken away from. Not to sound too complicated, [chuckling] but like One Nation has basically tripled in size in the last couple of years because the Liberal Party, after there was a Left-wing coup in it, is just in shambles.

 

And so I guess this leads into the next point which is about building up our party and the kind of support that we’re seeing.

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly! No, I want to get into that. And guys, I’ll get to some of your chats and questions for Tom here too in a moment. I appreciate the support there too. We’ll get to that.

 

Just quick, regarding the gun there’s a couple of things in terms of the fallout here. I think you have the next election in 2028 and again, I’m not staring myself too blind on this, but it’s just an interesting dynamic in terms of like will the current government been able to push through then a couple of things when it comes to additional gun laws or maybe then restricting these, even these hunting license, you know, hunting licenses that they’re handing out right now! And what do you think will happen in regards to the hate this was one headline from GB News here:

 

“Racial Hatred laws must be tightened in the wake of Bondi beach massacre!”

 

So are these the two main things that the Labor Party will deal with, do you think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. So Jack Eltis, the state leader [of NSN] for New South Wales, put out a very good post recently where he basically explained that it’s sad that the government is going to take away more rights of freedoms or privileges of the Australian population, but it’s ultimately a net positive in the sense that Australians do need to get shocked into reality. They need to wake up from their slumber and realize that no matter what happens, good, bad, indifferent, the result it’s going to be mutated into taking away their rights. That there’s never going to be a solution to deporting all these Muslims. There’s never going to be a solution to stopping the level of crime. Any law that’s passed is just going to affect you. And that these laws are constantly just, yeah, mutated to affect White Australians when White Australians are not the cause of the problem.

 

So I know a lot about gun laws in Australia because I used to be really interested in it as a subject prior to really dedicating myself to White nationalism. Really there’s not much they can do, there’s not much the government can do except hot air. What they will do if they want some sort of nominal victory is they will ban all the niche firearms that aren’t bolt action.

 

So at the moment in Australia we’ve got a whole bunch of firearms that kind of circumvent the law in the sense that they aren’t actually bolt action rifles, but you can get them on a Cat B license, which anyone can get if you join a hunting club, which is what this young Arab, this young half Indian Muslim dude did. He just joined, I think the Zavasta Hunting Club, which is like Serbian hunting club. It’s just connected to the Serbian community. Not that they’ve got any implication in this. That must have been his local hunting club. He joined that club, therefore he gets access to a Cat B.

 

But he didn’t use a strictly bolt action rifle in the attack. He used a straight, what’s called a “straight pull”, which, Beretta make one, I think Ticker makes one. There’s a whole bunch of gun companies that make niche rifles, but they’re always very expensive. A bolt action rifle in Australia would cost somewhere between six hundred and twelve hundred dollars. Like a decent one, or a half decent one. The straight pulls are usually the more bougie end of the market. Like two and a half, $3,000. Three and a half thousand dollars. So rifles are very expensive in Australia.

 

And what they would do to get a nominal victory is they would change the law and say:

 

“Straight pulls, they’re rapid fire bolt actions, they’re too fast! And we can’t let people get them!”

 

So that means the next terror attack will be like 20% slower, right? Instead of 15 people being killed, maybe 14 or 13 people will be killed.

 

Henrik Palgren: So just send more cops and the amount of kills will be the same. Or more female cops.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, shit, one of the female cops almost killed just a random Arab on the bridge.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, of course, [chuckling] yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So the death toll almost got higher! You know, insert the Sam Hyde clip. Fuck!

 

Yeah, they scare me genuinely, especially when they’re at the door.

 

But yeah, I’ve had a male cop tackle me like with his gun out. And I wasn’t in fear at all! I was just like:

 

“I’m not resisting, I’m not resisting!”

 

Like, I was just chill.

 

But when I see a female cop with a gun out, I freak out! I’m like:

 

“This is it. Hail Odin! Like it’s over. [chuckling] Yeah, take me!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Take you to Valhalla? Yeah, if a female cop shoots you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The Valkyries have come to take me! Oh no. Because they’re just so scary, because they’re shaking and shit! Like they get the brief. Like:

 

“He’s a terrorist! He’s a maniac! Be on guard!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And you say that to a woman with a gun before they’re like kicking your door. And fuck! It’s like they’re on speed. Like their pupils are so dilated its scary.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh gosh!

 

Thomas Sewell: The look in their eyes is scary. Yeah, it’s like you can’t tell where they’re predator or prey. It’s a mixture of both. They’re prey with a gun. It’s crazy!

 

But anyway, I’ll stop with the “misogyny”, because it’s not the point of the stream.

 

[59:13]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Let’s have some more. [chuckling] Come on! Okay. Yeah. So you know, again you have the Port Arthur massacre.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know that definitely is very suspicious!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I mean, undoubtedly. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s questions and it’s not because one’s a Muslim and one’s not. It’s not about that. The Port Arthur massacre is extremely suspicious and there’s a lot of good docos that have been made on it. An associate, I wouldn’t say an associate that might get him in trouble, but someone I’ve actually met before in the alternative sort of political space a decade ago, a guy called Paul Moder*, he actually made a documentary called Wasp on the Port Arthur massacre. And he spent about 10 years researching the Port Arthur massacre. And yeah, I won’t go into detail because I don’t want to do a conspiracy stream today, but it’s very obvious that what they’re telling us about that situation is just not true.

 

[* Film director and actor Paul Moder has embarked on a cinematic retelling of the Port Arthur Massacre, which goes into full production 2019, under the title of WASP. But unlike the current wave of “true crime”, Moder attempts to unpick the official version of events and create a rare piece of Australian revisionist-history cinema. Well before it’s made, WASP is already very controversial, but it continues a lineage of pessimism and historical revisionism that started in late 1960s with films like Blow Up, Parallax View and reaching crescendo with Oliver Stone’s JFK in 1991. https:// www.pureshitauscinema.com/interviews/moder.html]

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. And then end result of that, a lot of the guns were, it was a buyback program. Right. That happened after.

 

Thomas Sewell: So it’s a bit misunderstood. Even in Australia, most people don’t really know what happened. So John Howard* [former Aust PM] passed laws saying you can’t own semi-autos anymore, again unless you’ve got this special Cat C, Cat D license, whereas you used to get all firearms all on the same license.

 

[* John Winston Howard (born 26 July 1939) is an Australian former politician who served as the 25th prime minister of Australia from 1996 to 2007, holding office as leader of the Liberal Party of Australia. His eleven-year tenure as prime minister is the second-longest in Australian history, after that of Sir Robert Menzies. Since the death of Bob Hawke in 2019, Howard is the oldest living Australian former prime minister. Howard was born in Sydney and studied law at the University of Sydney. He was a commercial lawyer before entering Parliament.]

 

And I think some states, they didn’t even have licenses. I’ve heard stories of people, they could go into Kmart and buy a gun and like just buy it off the shelf and just take it on the train and go home with it. I’ve actually spoken to people in person that have said that they used to be able to, when they’re 18, they could walk down to the sports shop and buy a gun, get on a train, take the gun home on the train. No one would even blink an eye. And that was the Australia they grew up in. So some really similar to how America used to be. But after Port Arthur they changed the law so you can’t have semi-autos and they Instituted more licensing sort of schematics.

 

But what they did was they did it, they did a buyback program, but the stats of it are not publicly known. They’re publicly available, but they only got about 700,000 rifles in that first year. Obviously they got a few more later on, but they only got back about 700,000 rifles.

 

And I think 4% of the rifles they got back in the buyback were semi-autos. And to put that into context, 600,000 SKS is, were imported into the country in 1995 and 1996. So the year that the gun buyback happened, more SKS came into the country than SKS were handed over.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: Really any rifle that was handed over, almost.

 

So yeah, there’s a lot of law in this country about, there’s a whole generation of guys in their 70s and 80s that have all just got like crates of SKS is buried on their farms. Now, I’ve personally never seen it, I’ve never witnessed it, never touched one, never heard of one. They all got lost in fishing trips as far as, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Tragic boating accident!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, tragic boating accidents. I got no knowledge of anything like of the sort! But there’s a lot of like folklore about those hundreds of thousands of SKS that came in the country in 1996. As I said, only 4% of the 700,000 rifles that were handed back were semi-autos. And actually they’re not SKSs. They were actually SKKs.

 

So they’re like a Chinese SKS that could take AK magazines. And very occasionally there’ll be a shooting between like bikies and the cops. And you’ll see it’s full automatic fire coming out of one of these SKKs, shooting the helicopters or something crazy like that.

 

Henrik Palgren: So.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but again that’s all very old, like, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, right.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll be in the Cosmoline oil* or whatever in the crates in the ground and 99% of them be forgotten about if the bikies don’t get their hands on them. But the Arabs actually have AKs and Glocks, all these like organized crime groups. There’s a whole shipment of Glocks that went missing years ago.

 

[* Cosmoline is the genericized trademark for a common class of brown, wax-like petroleum-based corrosion inhibitors, typically conforming to United States, Military Standard MIL-C-11796C Class 3. They are viscous when freshly applied, have a slight fluorescence, and solidify over time with exposure to air. The main ingredient in cosmoline is aliphatic petroleum solvent, which is volatile and evaporates over time.]

 

There’s been two terrorist attacks on Australian soil in the past by Africans of all things. And they got AKs from the local mosque. So there’s a huge amount of illegal firearms to that have been imported in the country since 1996 that the Arabs and Muslims have control over. Because they’re involved with organized crime.

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: They control the vast majority of organized crime in Australia, similar to Sweden.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep, that’s right. Exactly! Yeah. Guns came in. I figured it’d be a little bit more complicated with Australia being an island as opposed to the EU. You can basically just drive in with them from like some Balkan country or something.

 

[1:03:51]

 

Thomas Sewell: But they get them in the same way they get drugs and they just get them in on shipping container. If a whole bunch get caught, they don’t care. They can bring in a thousand at a time.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, they’re the arming themselves and they’re being allowed to also. Yeah, I mean, let’s be honest. It’s a feature and not a bug, I think, to be honest.

 

Okay, so the next thing that we’re going. Yeah, okay, so Hate Speech laws. Anything else you want to say about that? What do you think? So they banned the swastika and the roman, you know, things like this. What’s next here? What do you think you’re looking at?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll just be more funding to this new task force they’ve built, the AFP, Australian Federal Police, which is basically trying to convert itself into the FBI.

 

So the Federal Police, my understanding of the Federal Police for the last couple decades has really focused on organized crime, has focused on importing and shipping like drugs into the country or guns into the country. It’s been focused on white-collar crime as well.

 

So really big frauders, really big scammers, kind of Wall Street crime, white-collar crime, people stealing money that work at banks. I know there was some young guys that got done with some sort of banking fraud scheme. And that’s all AFP. The state police don’t handle a lot of that. More expertise crime. That’s really what the feds have been doing for a long time. And what they’re converting the Federal Police into is. And it’s very clever the way the government do it. They basically have control of the budget. And so they’ll say:

 

“Hey, we’re giving this much money to the Federal Police. Oh you’ve got less funding now. You’ve got to shut down some of your departments.”

 

And so they shut down these departments and then like they do the budget and then the next year they go:

 

“Oh, actually you’re getting 500 million more than last year!”

 

And then it’s like:

 

“Oh, and here are the new departments that we recommend you set up.”

 

So there’s an article that came out today. So when the ASIO director general, Mike Burgess*, came into position in charge of ASIO, back in 2019, they fired 10 of the most senior, kind of staff of ASIO, And they would have done the same thing. They would have said:

 

“Oh, we don’t have money. You know, we’re too top heavy. We’re too top heavy! It’s a boys club at the top and they’re all on a good salary and we got to save money. We’re too top heavy!”

 

[* Michael Paul Burgess is an Australian intelligence official, and the current Director-General of Security in charge of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO). Prior to his appointment to this role on 16 September 2019, Burgess was director-general of the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). Burgess was born in England, and immigrated to Adelaide, South Australia in 1973 at the age of seven. He was the first member of his family to study in higher education, receiving a degree in electrical engineering from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988.]

 

That’s what they’re doing. They’re trying to do that with defense at the moment. But really it’s always a coup. And it’s known in the Australian inner circle as being “The Red Wedding”. That’s what they called it. It’s like the Red Wedding where they basically couped and they killed off, they retired, they forced retired like 10 of the most senior counter terrorist experts at ASIO. That were probably like racist Right-wingers that were like they’re the post 9/11 intelligence people* that are like:

 

“Yep, let’s catch these Muslims!”

 

And they got rid of those guys. And that was around the time this Bondi shooter was being investigated by ASIO, So what you have is then you had the Brennan Tarrant incident [in New Zealand] happen. You had the top 10 senior staff of ASIO getting fired.

 

[* Who would well know that 9/11 was a ZOG false flag engineered from Israel. See ALSO LINKS below.]

 

And then you have the new funding come in after they’re getting fired. And that new funding came in, and 40% of their budget now is Right-wing extremism. And the budget for these state police forces, Federal Police forces and ASIO varies anywhere from 40 to 70% of their budget of their task force, of their manpower. Really, that’s what it means, is dedicated to anti-semitism from the Right-wing perspective, as opposed to from the Muslim perspective or just terrorism from a Right-wing perspective, as a set of terrorism from a Muslim perspective.

 

And so what we would be looking at is more funding to these task force. So that would mean more offices, that would mean a bigger budget, that would mean more raids, that would mean more intimidation, that would mean more charges are going to get laid.

 

And so it just means that people just got to be more, I guess, sensitive with their rhetoric. There are things that I have said in the past, back in 2018, 2019, that I, after those reforms came in, there’s no way I would say them in 2022, 2023.

 

And likewise, there are things that I’ve said online, 2023 that I just simply would not say today. And it’s not because I’m a, it’s not because I’m fucking optics cucking and:

 

“Oh, I’m a moderate now. Now we’ve got mainstream coverage and we’re a household name now I’m changing my rhetoric and betraying my base!”

 

It’s like, no, it’s just that I don’t want to go to jail for two years for fucking saying the wrong thing on the Internet. I’m okay with going to jail for a couple months for punching people in the head. That’s cool. But I’m not okay with going to jail for two, … Like what’s happening to Joel [Davis] right now? I mean, what did he say? “Rhetorical rape”?

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s crazy! And he’s done like two months now, so he’s done almost as much time, … He’s got a bailout coming up on the 23rd, so that’ll be what, a month in jail or more? It’d be almost six weeks in jail!

 

Henrik Palgren: Have you spoken to him recently?

 

[1:08:45]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I haven’t because he has to call me. So it takes a long time to get names and numbers added to the callers. So I haven’t received a phone call from him unfortunately. But I expect one soon. But I’ve spoken obviously with the lawyer and there’s obviously confidentiality so he can’t go into detail, but he can pass on regards and tell me about his general well being.

 

So yeah, I have spoken to people that have spoken to him. But yeah, he seems to be doing okay. He’s just frustrated. And as you would be.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, he missed his birth of his son, I believe.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. His first child.

 

Henrik Palgren: And they’ve been going after his girlfriend as well. Some headlines out, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Are you in contact with anyone else around him and how they’re dealing with it, the situation?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, my missus and his missus are in contact. Obviously she needs a bit of space with everything that’s going on. But you know, she’s reached out and yeah, we’re in contact with her. She’s got a little bit of support in Sydney from some of the partners over there and also her family are quite supportive.

 

So yeah, it’s disgusting that that journalist that went and harassed her. I think it was like two or three days after she gave birth where she’s putting nappies in the bin and they’ve got a private investigator out the front taking photos of her. That same journalist came to my family, my in law’s house and twisted words that my family said through a fly screen door.

 

And they also went to Matthew Gruter’s house as well and Matthew Gruter’s wife had just given birth as well. I think they had a two week old baby. And yeah, when they went to my family, my in-laws house, we’ve got a brand new baby as well. Like we’re not brand new but like a six month old baby and a toddler. And they’re attacking, they’re coming after the women, they’re coming after our wives and you know, it’s obviously abhorrent. But and it’s radicalizing, it’s really radicalizing. You know the expression:

 

“You don’t hate journalists enough!”

 

And this is a classic example of it. Like imagine the mentality that a journalist would have to go:

 

“Oh, this woman’s just given birth.”

 

Because they know, they know the details because it was mentioned in court that she was due within a week. And so imagine going:

 

“Oh, she’s due within a week. Let’s cause as much stress and harm and cortisol to her as possible!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And put her in the news and put her in the media either while she’s just about to have birth or give birth or she’s just had the process.

 

And anyone that knows anything about childbirth, labor, postpartum, they know that that’s the most absolutely critical time for a woman to balance her hormones and to not have any unnecessary stress. It’s when they need the most amount of sort of oxytocin. They just need love, they need cuddles. Like usual, but on another level, women need just cuddles in general.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: But they really just need cuddles and support before, during and after that whole process. And these journalists would know that they would know that. She’s a woman, she would know that. But these people are evil and they’re possessed by demons and the demons attack the vulnerable. They attack the weak and the vulnerable and they attack women. They attack women when they’re at their most vulnerable. I mean my missus didn’t get attacked like any day of the week while I wasn’t in jail. But she’s getting harassed and attacked by journalists when I’m in jail. So when she’s alone. So they come after you when you’re alone. They come after you when you’re vulnerable. They come after you when you’ve just given birth, you can barely walk because, you’re still recovering.

 

I mean, yeah. What we’re going to do to these journalists when we take power in a legal and lawful manner is going to be like, I’ve got experience with how the system has treated me over the years for being a political dissident. And yeah, these people are really silly! Like the way they’re behaving, they don’t know who they’re messing with. They just don’t know who they’re messing with! They don’t realize that we have really long memories and we are never going to forgive them! Ever! So keep going, see what happens! I mean they may as well keep doubling down because they’re already going to get the worst! [chuckling] Like the worst thing I can think of is what’s going to happen to these journalists, to do this to Joel’s missus and by default to Joel. But Joel’s fine, he’ll be right. But to do this to his partner is just disgusting!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, media has always been a fifth column, right? Always an operative for the state, an additional element or something that you can use in your war, in your effort to target someone who is an undesirable to the system, essentially. Right.

 

So yeah, it’s absolutely disgusting!

 

Okay, so yes, tell us and then we’ll get to some questions here too, guys. We appreciate you get a bunch of questions to get to, and comments.

 

But yeah, the party then. So tell us about how these ideas formulated and the fact that you were at a point here, like the legal process in Australia makes it fairly easy as far as I understand it. And I’m sure there’s hoops you have to jump through as always. But in terms of actually registering it and even the possibility of getting a seat in a county, I’m not sure if you call a county down there, but explain this to us a little bit.

 

[1:14:22]

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay. Well, from the start, Australia has two houses. It has what’s called an Upper House and a Lower House. Our Upper House is a Senate and you get elected based off the, a larger, … How to explain it?

 

So you can get Senators in quite easily if you broadly get a vote across the state. So even though it’s a federal election, you might only need somewhere between 1 and 10% of the state to vote for you. And again, it’s not a straightforward, it’s not an exact percentage that you need. Some people get 7% of the vote and they don’t get a Senator. Some people get 2% of the vote and they get a Senator. It’s all about preferencing schemes and deals and there’s a lot of dodgy stuff that goes on in the Australian system, which should all be eradicated, but we just have to work with what we’ve got.

 

But if you get say 10% of the vote, you’re almost guaranteed to get a Senate seat, and that’s 10% of the vote, regardless of where they are living in that state. And then each state, I think has, I don’t know, I think there’s like 49. No, there’d be more than 49. I think it’s 75 Senators in total, something like that. And they’re spread out across the state at a federal level.

 

But then you have the Lower House, which are called MPs or it’s the House of Representatives and you have to actually win the majority of the vote within what you would call a county. We call it an electorate.

 

And so the state is broken down into say, I think 49 electorates and or it actually depends. I think it’s 120,000 people per electorate, roughly. Some are 100,000, some 140,000, but roughly it’s 120,000 people or 120,000 voters, one or the other. And you have to win 51% or 50.1% of the vote to get that seat. Now you don’t have to win 50% of the primary vote, you have to do these preferencing schemes with all these other parties, because we’re not a two party system like in America where it’s Republican or Democrat. The Labor Party might get 34% of the vote, then the Green Party might get 8% of the vote, that makes 42. And then as long as their coalition is bigger than the coalition of the Liberals, then they get the seat.

 

So there’s like, I don’t know, 200 MPs across the country and 75 Senators, something like that, or those aren’t exact numbers. Just go on Wikipedia and you can find out exactly! But what’s important to know is that we have these two different houses. Kind of like how you’ve got Congressmen and Senators and kind of like how in the UK they’ve got the House of Lords and then they’ve got the ministers, or, sorry, not the ministers, the MPs.

 

So we have MPs and we have Senators and they’re different, they’re elected on different bases. Now we’re not really going to contest the Lower House. Even though there’s more seats available, those seats are much harder to get because you need to actually be the dominant political force in that area, which if you’re not in the major parties, is almost impossible.

 

For example, the Green Party in Australia is the third biggest party in Australia and they have 11 Senators or 10 Senators. And I think they only have one MP. And that could have been from a defection. I don’t know if actually. No, it might have been an actual victory in the Lower House.

 

So that’s basically all the MP seats are controlled by the Liberal Party and Labor Party, the two big parties. They’ve got like a monopoly on the Lower House, duopoly, or jewopoly.

 

And then the Senate is actually more diverse. It’s got all the micro parties in it. It’s got One Nation’s got four or five seats. The Greens have got 10 seats. There’s all these niche parties with one or two seats. So they have a lot more power in the Senate. And how that works is the Lower House passes bills. So they’ll say we want to introduce new legislation or we want to introduce new laws. And they’ll draft it up, they’ll write it up. They have to make their deals in the Lower House to get the Bill to pass through the Lower House, which is where the Prime Minister is. We don’t have a president. So the Prime Minister doesn’t have any executive power at passing bills. His executive powers come from his cabinet.

 

So it’s more about the management of the country. That’s where his power comes from. He can’t manage the Lower House. He’s just the Prime Minister. He’s the prime speaker in the Lower House. He doesn’t have like, I don’t believe he has any veto ability. If he does, someone in the chat correct me, but I don’t believe the Prime Minister has any vetoing ability. There’s all sorts of niche crazy laws. Because we’ve got like the British Parliament system, we’re basically operating a British Parliament that’s slightly modified. So there’s a Speaker of the House and there’s a Leader of the House, all sorts of stuff going on.

 

But the general rule is that once the Bill passes through the Lower House, it then has to go to the Upper House, which is the Senators, and then has to be passed through the Upper House as well.

 

So if we can get guys in the Senate, we can block bills that are bad for White Australians and we can agree to bills that are good for White Australians. And we can quite easily in the next one or three between one and three election cycles. So between three to nine years from now, we can quite easily, quite easily, hold the balance in the Senate!

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: So what that, what that would mean is we might only need five seats in the Senate and we could quite easily swing, … A lot of these bills. They can be swung by one or two votes in the Senate. So it might pass easily through the Lower House, but then it gets the Senate, it won’t get through the Senate. So we can block some bad stuff coming through. And obviously that can then tie in with our general political strategy.

 

Obviously, we don’t believe that there’s a pure Parliamentary solution. Obviously, we’re working in so many different ways to build parallel society and parallel function in this country.

 

And obviously the meta-political shift and the cultural shift that we’re trying to make, which is our primary concern is getting Australians to identify as White people. The problem is that they don’t identify as White people. Well, they’re starting to. And that’s where we’re seeing our success, is they’re starting to identify as White people again, which is how it was. And we need to get back.

 

And what we’re seeing with this Bondi thing, for example, is for the first time ever, in the “most successful multicultural” country in the world, we’re seeing actually a lot of mainstream criticizm of multiculturalism. So multiculturalism is like the golden calf in Australia. They worship it. They absolutely worship it! Multiculturalism is the replacement to the White Australia Policy.

 

So for the first, no one’s allowed to criticize multiculturalism. If you criticize it, you have to criticize it in a way that:

 

“Oh, they’re not assimilating enough! Of course I support multiculturalism, but I just want a better version of multiculturalism.”

 

You know, I mean that’s the only way that people really criticize multiculturalism in Parliament, within the political realm. But what we’re finally seeing now is genuine criticizm and a grassroots dislike of multiculturalism in Australia. But there’s not one political party that’s against multiculturalism. We’re the only one.

 

So can we get 5% of the vote? Can we get 10? Can we get 20? Can we get 30? I don’t know. I don’t have the answer to that at this stage. Time will tell, and we’ll see how bad the country gets and how radical and how racialized politics becomes. But we are succeeding in what we’re doing. We have about double the amount of people that are signed up to support us. However, only half of those people are signed up to actually go on the registrar, which is a private form with the AEC. It’s not the government. The AEC is a third party that is obviously a government institution, but it’s a unique third party that has never leaked data of membership lists.

 

Henrik Palgren: So this would be the first! No, I’m just joking! Because it would, …

 

[1:22:10]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: It would be the first time. Well, how they doxed the One Nation list back in 1998 or 1999, but they didn’t dox it from the AEC. The AEC didn’t have a breach of privacy. They’re a professional institution. They’re civn ats mostly, but they’re professional institution, and they’re a patriotic institution in that sense. But the way that the list of One Nation members got leaked was by jews in the party. Jews in the party leaked it!

 

So they had, there were jews in the party that had access to the list and they leaked it to their friends that didn’t like the party. Whereas we don’t have any jews in our party.

 

Henrik Palgren: First time in history!

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s only about four people in the organization. Maybe a fifth. Yeah, there’s four or five people that have access to the list. I am one of them, obviously.

 

But yeah, it’s held in the absolute tightest of circles. There’s some state leaders that don’t even have access to the list. If they asked for it, we would give it to them. I would let any state leader see the list.

 

But yeah, it’s a very, it’s a secret document. I mean, ASIO would probably be able to see the list because they could probably hack into our computers. But look, what are they going to do with it? What are ASIO going to do with it?

 

Henrik Palgren: No, sure. No, I get the point. I’m just saying, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The fact is there’s 3400 people on the list, so I wouldn’t be concerned. So there’s some Australians:

 

“I don’t want to sign up to the party because then ASIO is going to know I exist!”

 

It’s like, look, you’re probably already on a list from being racist on Facebook and liking The Noticer. You know [chuckling] what I mean?

 

Like if you follow particular pages on Facebook, you’re probably already on their list. I guess you would just be on a maybe a different list.

 

But again, I’ve said this for years. It’s strength in numbers. It’s strength in numbers. And we share the risk. We share the risk. When there’s 10,000 names on the list, which maybe in a year or two there will be, what matters? Why does it matter if you’re one of ten thousand? I mean, if you’re one of ten thousand, what’s going to happen to you? The police, I mean, how much resources they’re going to have to harass? The way the police harass us is they prioritize who’s most important to harass. So they harass the leadership. 90% of our membership have never been harassed by the police. They’ve had no issues with the police.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I mean, that’s membership of our activist core. I’m not talking about membership of the party. I’m saying 90% of our activists because we’re so big now, the vast majority have never even been tested. So only the kind of guys that have been around four or five years have really any experience with repeated harassment from the police.

 

So, yeah, I would say that’s the party website. Well, that’s the org website. Obviously, the party is a part of the org. We’re looking at putting forward our four big policies in January next year.

 

[1:24:54]

 

So we just had a series of seminars where we covered our four policies. They’re not on the website yet. I’ve copped a little bit of criticizm for that, but it will be up on the website soon. We’re just polishing them. We had a seminar last weekend across all the States except New South Wales because they’re preparing for nationals. Where we covered, we had one speaker per policy. And the four policies are simple.

 

We want the White Australia Policy to be reinstated, meaning we don’t want Australia to be a multicultural country anymore, we don’t want it to be a multiracial country anymore. And we want to start reversing the demographic avalanche of White people and start going back the other way and making Australia more White. And with the ultimate goal of making it entirely White.

 

And obviously that is going to involve a combination of mass deportations and also re-migration strategies. So we’d be looking at changing a whole number of laws. Is that going to happen anytime soon? No, but what we can do is start moving things in the right direction by taking a little bit of state control. So our biggest priority is protecting our demographics.

 

And so if we can protect the demographics of this country then all the other sort of Weimar conditions are fixable. You know, demographics are well not permanent. But demographics are destiny obviously. And that’s really our priority as a party. That’s why it’s policy number one is just protecting White Australia, protecting our demographics. And not just protecting it, but advancing our demographics. So we’ve gone from 99% White to about 66% White or 67% White in a period of around 50 years. So what we want to look at doing over the next 50 years or less, ideally a lot less, ideally over the next 10 years. But I’m realistic, it might take a bit more than 10 years. We want to look at going back up towards 99% and beyond.

 

Policy number two is called “End Debt Slavery”. So we’re going to ban obviously in the same principle as the White Australia Policy, the first principle of End Debt Slavery is we’re going to ban interest on family home loans.

 

So we’re going to guarantee every single Australian family an interest free home loan. They’ll get money lent to them by the State bank. So we’re going to take back the state bank.

 

So we had a state bank in Australia called the Commonwealth Bank. It’s since been privatized in 1996 and it’s worth, I don’t know, something like $1.3 trillion. And we’re going to take back ownership of the state bank and we’re going to use the state bank, the Commonwealth bank, to lend money to young families that are married, that are White Australians and they’re going to get interest free loans to buy houses.

 

And that’s how we’re going to fix the housing crisis is we’re going to deport millions of non-Whites which is going to massively free up the market. And then White Australians that want to buy a home or White Australians that currently have a home, all the interest is going to be wiped off the principal. So any new loan will be no interest. And any current loan, not only will you not pay interest going forward, but also any interest you have paid is going to be refunded to you off your principal.

 

So a lot of people are going to have their homes basically instantly paid off because most people have already paid more than their homes worth in interest. If they’re like Gen-X’s for example, if they’re more in the older sort of family bracket, they’ve got teenage kids and stuff, a lot of these people have already paid off their homes in interest alone. So that’s policy number two.

 

Policy number three is we’re going to do something called a “New Magna Carta”, or a Bill of Rights. We’re going to create an Australian Bill of Rights. Australia doesn’t have a Bill of Rights. So policy three is we’re going to introduce a series of rights and duties, a series of freedoms that we think are fundamental to being Australian and members of Western civilization, members of the White race. And we’re going to introduce these things in order to curtail the ever increasing Police State we live in and the powers of the tyranny of the government. So we want to reduce government power and increase citizen power.

 

So that’s things like a First Amendment. So like free speech, we don’t have that in our constitution. We have an implied right and that’s not good enough, because it’s being twisted and turned. We need to have a really explicit principle so that we get rid of all this hate speech legislation and all this religious vilification legislation. We want to get rid of all of that and give Australians the right to freedom of speech. And the right to criticize the government, even criticize us as much as we’re, you know, authoritarians, we’ll cop fair criticizm, obviously.

 

Other principles include, we want to do like a maximum 10% income tax. We want to include gun rights, but we’re going to be very tactful for how we include gun rights. So I want to do the Swiss model personally. I’m flexible and I’m open minded to how we could implement a Second Amendment in Australia.

 

[1:29:48]

 

Bu I want to do it in the Swiss model. Meaning you would do a national service at a high school. You would get issued a firearm during your national service and then you would retain that military style semi-automatic rifle or fully automatic rifle, but you would maintain that rifle as you would never be a civilian again. You would do your national service and that would make you a citizen. Kind of Starship Troopers kind of Fascism 101.

 

But it’s also just Athenian. It’s an Athenian model. It’s actually the foundation of democracy in some ways, the citizen soldier.

 

So that’s how we would look at implementing it. It wouldn’t be a strict Second Amendment the way you guys have it in Australia [America], because we need a lot of cultural change. We need, I think a few generations or at least one generation to breathe. To fix a lot of these issues. We don’t want to just have like guns galore just overnight without those kind of cultural changes.

 

And then policy four is re-industrialization. So that’s pretty simple. It’s really about taking back our infrastructure. Australia being an economic powerhouse again. Not just getting stripped of all its natural resources and being sent off to the developing world. We want to build all of our stuff here again. We want to build cars here again. We want to build ships here again. We’re an island. We should have a massive shipping capacity. We’re so reliant on trade. We should be a naval superpower. We should be we’re already a resource superpower. We have all the raw materials to do it. We need to re-industrialize.

 

We need to invest, take control of the RBA, the Reserve Bank of Australia, take control of the Commonwealth bank and do some serious, serious economy building in a completely different direction using high tech manufacturing and reclaim our economic autarky, or at least a large percentage of it.

 

So those are the four policies that’s what we’re putting forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of things mixed in amongst that you know, people talk about education Reform and you know, getting rid of multiculturalism will do a lot of what we want for education reform.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s a lot to take in. No, obviously everyone needs to visualize that.

 

So the website, we’re going to have nice little graphics made up and there’ll be a little write up of each policy. And when you check the website out at some point, either late, probably not late January, probably February, but the policies will be announced soon. And I assume the website will be very neat and tidy by February with the policies.

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good. Nice. Holden, was that the car the Australia used to produce?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] right. Yeah, we made Fords as well. Fords and Holden, Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Like a version of Ford Australia, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Kind of yeah. And Holden’s just General Motors.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, okay, I see. Did you have any like native cars that you actually like?

 

Thomas Sewell: Holden is the native brand that was eventually owned by General Motors.

 

Henrik Palgren: We’re gonna have an Aryan future Tom. They’re gonna be flying cars. Okay!

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, there’s gonna be all. Look, I’m not gonna go too much into policy four because it’s a bottomless pit of what we can do.

 

Henrik Palgren: Powered by vril!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna do the craziest shit! We’re gonna do stuff no one’s ever seen before. We’re gonna terraform Australia. We’re gonna actually terraform it.

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna do crazy shit! We’re gonna do inland lake, high speed rail, flying cars, …

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s the spirit! That’s the spirit right there!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s gonna be vriltastic!

 

Henrik Palgren: Vriltastic. I just want to play this.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna give Australia a sense of purpose again. It’s not just about race and it’s not removing the slavery.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: White Australians without debt or without interest still have a demoralized attitude. What we’re trying to do is raise that spirit. It’s about a spiritual revival.

 

And I think part of that, because I’m not too big at talking about economics, although I’ve studied it a fair bit in my own time, but where economics is important is that most people, 99% of men need to go to work Monday to Friday. They need to. It’s a big part of their identity. It’s a big part of their purpose. And where most White men are lacking in purpose is not just from a racial perspective and not just from a demoralization in terms of the culture and the media and the movies they’re watching and the music they’re listening to. And the way that they’re being completely subverted at an economic level. It’s also when they go to work, what are they doing? Like, I worked in the construction industry for about five years, almost six years. And you go to work and you’re building what we call Jeet boxes. A Jeet box is these fucking shitty little townhouses with like all these different multi-roofs on them. They’re just the dumb. This is the dumbest fucking architecture style you ever see in your life! It’s the most ineffective, inefficient way to build a house you could possibly imagine. And it’s a dog box with no room on it, no backyard. The roofs are all touching each other, so they’re a separate dwelling, but not really. And it’s just so demoralizing just putting a roof on something like that. It just feels disgusting!

 

And then one day a month, you get a contract, or a cashy or something, and it’s some guy on a farm and he’s got 200 acres and he needs a new roof on his shed. And you go out, you drive an extra hour and a half to go to this guy’s farm. And you put the roof on the shed and you have a beer with the boys afterwards. And you just look at each other and you just say:

 

“What if every day was like this? What if every day was like this? Like, how good did today feel?”

 

Like the weather could have been awful! It doesn’t matter. And it just feels so good to just be on some land and just to build something and then and you can have a relationship with the guy you’re building it for. Like the farmer comes out of his house, he’s like:

 

“How you going boys? You know, you wanna iced coffee or something? I’ll get the Mrs to make you one.”

 

And like you, after work you can sit back and you can chat a bit and then you get in the car and you drive home.

 

[1:36:24]

 

 

But when you’re in these jeet boxes, like the dust and the muck and Indians are coming out of their house next to you and oh, it’s just so demoralizing. It’s just, why am I doing this? Why am I building this disgusting, ugly, grotty filth for these people to just replace me? So we want to bring back the Australian dream. Not just in the:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a nice house and I’ve got a nice backyard and I’ve got a golden retriever and a white picket fence.”

 

It’s not just about getting it back in that sense. It’s, well, what are you doing to get it? So we want to completely revolutionize the economy in a way that people actually feel a sense of pride, going to work again. Which I think Australians and Americans and Europeans, they probably had that 50 years ago.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I think you’re right. Absolutely! Yeah. I wanted to play this clip here and I’m going to take some of the comments and questions from the audience watching here. But Robert Menzies, he was the 12th Prime Minister of Australia. He served from 1939-41 and then his second term from 46. Was that all the way to his retirement in 1966? Did he serve that long? Do you remember? Was that long? Or it must have been interrupted.

 

Anyway, it doesn’t matter. I want to play a clip with him. That’s the point on the White Australia Policy. Right. So listen to this here. I’m sure you’ve seen the clip, but let’s play it for the audience here.

 

Stewart Lamb: Do you believe that the White, the so-called “White Australia” policy will always be a stumbling block?

 

Sir Robert Menzies: I don’t think it’s such a stumbling block as people pretend, but that it’s important for us, I haven’t the slightest doubt!

Stewart Lamb: That we should maintain it the way it is?

Sir Robert Menzies: As long as we possibly can we ought to aim at having a homogeneous population!

I don’t want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa, or in America, or increasingly in Great Britain. I think it’s been a very good policy and it’s been of great value to us.

And most of the criticizm of it that I’ve ever heard doesn’t come from these oriental countries. It comes from (((wandering Australians))).

Stewart Lamb: For these views of course, in the past, Sir Robert, you have been described as a racist.

Sir Robert Menzies: Have I?

Stewart Lamb: I have read this, yes.

Sir Robert Menzies: Well, if I were not described as a racist, I’d be the only public man who hasn’t been! That’s one of these jargons, isn’t it? One of these modern words, you call a man a “racist”.

 

[END]

 

All right, what do you make of that? That’s how it used to be. Right? So this was like an idea. This is what I’m saying. What you’re proposing here is not some new radical thing. This is just basically going back to what the intention of the country was to begin with and the people running it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I really. A little bit of a red herring, but I really like the way he describes jews as “wandering Australians”.

 

Henrik Palgren: I figured that’s what it was! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. That was a dog whistle back in the day. Yeah. You know:

 

“We don’t get this kind of criticizm from the Orientals. We get this kind of criticizm from the wandering Australians.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Same thing as Nixon, because this is around the same time as Nixon. This is where you’ve got the conservative Right in power and back in the 60s, and they’re starting to realize that the jewish problem is what’s trying to destroy the nation. And it’s very clear from day dot that the jewish community here in Australia and obviously in America and Britain have been working fervently hard to dismantle the homogeneous White population and turn it into Babylon, so that they can hide in the mess that they make and they can hide their crimes. And yeah, as you said, that is how Australia was.

 

Another thing that’s interesting is how much the accent has changed. I obviously don’t have a pure Australian accent. I’m referred to a lot as a South African, but I’m actually not a South African. I have extended family in South Africa, but my accent is because my parents are both English.

 

So you can actually tell from these old politicians. Australians actually spoke with more of an English accent. They were more connected to the mother country in that sense. And the accent has definitely degraded, I think. And it’s more, it’s too ocka now. It’s become more and more uncouth. I know that I can’t really talk much. Also there was an increase of, there was just so much English immigration into Australia. So that would have maintained the properness of the English accent.

 

[1:40:08]

 

But yeah, what can you say about that? What I see as a statesman, we used to have statesmen in charge of the country. If I was living in 1966, would I have agreed with Menzies? Probably not. There probably would have been someone more racist than Menzies. I probably would have been like:

 

“Menzies a cuck!”

 

Or whatever [chuckling] the 1966 version of that was. Like:

 

“Menzies is too soft on the (((wandering Australian))). We need a, we need a more strict approach to the wandering Australian question!”

 

But yeah, it’s definitely obvious that Canada, Australia, even America to a large degree. There’s a lot of infrastructure, sort of rhetorical infrastructure in the founding of our nations. And you can find it.

 

I mean, I did a speech, a 45 minute speech on the weekend and I mentioned in the speech I had a legal friend who’s looked through the Constitution very thoroughly. The founding father of Australia or the first prime minister of Australia, Edmund Barton. Someone was arguing with him while they were drafting the Constitution in 1898. So it came out in 1901, but they spent about three years drafting it. And in 1898 he had an argument with another politician and they were asking about:

 

“Why have you put this race, this specific race power law in?”

 

And the first Prime Minister of Australia said:

 

“Basically we need a race power law because we need to be able to mass deport non-Whites when we don’t want them.”

 

And he didn’t even use the term “non-Whites”. He basically said:

 

“Inferior people and races, inferior and colored races. We should be able to deport them as a whole, when we don’t need them.”

 

So like if we need them to pick sugarcane, for example, like the way that you had blacks picking cotton, we had Pacific Islanders picking sugarcane in Queensland. The idea was before Federation we had, I can’t remember what they call them. “Coolies” [refers to Chinese workers], I think, or Kanakas*, I think they had a slur for them.

 

[* Plantation owners in Queensland had experienced difficulty in hiring laborers for their plantations, especially for the pay rates that were being offered. It was said that this situation was hindering the economic viability of those rural businesses. Many pastoralists had used convicts as laborers, but when the transportation of convicts to New South Wales ended in 1840, this meant that the plantation owners lost a major source of cheap labor. The lack of cheap labor for cotton and sugar plantations in Queensland led to the advent of Kanaka immigration. Kanakas (as laborers from the Pacific Islands were called) were imported in large numbers to work in Australia (especially in Queensland, but also in northern New South Wales). The term “Kanaka” means “man” or “person” in the Hawaiian language. Souce: Https:// www. Australianculture.org/the-white-Australia-policy-kanakas /]

 

But they had these Pacific islanders come in and pick sugarcane and they wanted to make sure there was legislation that if they brought in a thousand of them, they picked the sugar cane and then they could force them on a boat to go home when it was done, so that they could keep Australia White. And he won the argument and they put it in the Constitution. So in the Australian constitution, there’s a race power law where we can just mass deport people on the basis of their race.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the kind of country. Yeah. So we’re doing well here. We’re doing well here.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nice.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I’m very excited. I’m very excited. We’re breath of fresh air for the political system. The Australian people are begging! They’re begging for a real Right-wing party. And we’re getting a lot of support. And we have a lot of people come down to our seminars, our political meetings, and say:

 

“Hey, look, I’ve been a Liberal Party member my whole life. I’ve gone to Liberal Party meetings my whole life and I’ve never seen anything like this. I’m so glad to see proud, patriotic Australians!”

 

And the feedback has just been amazing! The feedback, especially the older generation, like all the Boomers coming down, just saying thank, like basically just:

 

“Thank you, finally we’re seeing men that are just red blooded!”

 

And I’ve haven’t been to a Liberal Party meeting in a really long time. But I’ve had friends go and some of our members get paid to go to Liberal Party meetings [chuckling] because they got to fill seats. And the young guys that don’t have jobs, they’re like:

 

“All right, I’ll take the 100 bucks.”

 

And it’s that embarrassing, the Liberal Party at the moment. But they just report back and they just say:

 

“It’s just old people that are dying, that are just like falling asleep. And the people speaking are just homosexuals!”

 

It’s just homosexuals and girl bosses and that’s it. And they just useless rhetoric. And it’s just uninspiring. It’s just boring. And it’s just a freight train just running out of steam basically.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And that’s the system. It’s just a freight train running out of steam. They’ve got the momentum of decades and decades of organizing behind them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I mean, the parties are shrinking. The political parties here in Australia have never been so small. I think the Liberal Party has gone from like 60,000 members a decade ago to like, I think they’re barely getting 20,000 now. And I mean, just in the last election cycle, I think they’ve gone from 30,000 to 20,000 just in one election cycle.

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s fascinating! So, like, everyone’s checking out, but like the bureaucracy, the paperwork, the same. The scum that have the motivation, I guess, just to kind of get into that dirty world and keep it going. That’s what just is causing it to move on for now.

 

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t even put policies on our website yet and we’re already tracking to be the sixth biggest party in Australia out of the like 100 parties that are in Australia.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’d be hilarious!

 

[1:45:04]

 

Thomas Sewell: So the hype is real. The hype is real! Like a lot of people are hyping it online. And I don’t want people thinking like:

 

“Oh, we’re gonna have Prime Minister Thomas Sewell!”

 

That’s not likely. I want to make it clear that’s not likely at all! The chance of that is probably 1%. It’d have to be really happening for something like that to happen. It’d be like Ron Paul would have a meltdown. It’d be that kind of happening.

 

Henrik Palgren: And as we know, nothing ever happens.

 

Thomas Sewell: Until it happens. Nothing ever happens until it happens. And then one day it happens!

 

Henrik Palgren: Let me ask you this, Tom, though, because obviously you will be, as you know, and I’m sure you’ve thought about this too, you will be dealt with or treated on a totally different level. I mean, you would potentially see for the democratic system to defend itself, it would basically unravel the very definitions and guardrails that makes it being able to term itself as a democracy. I would reckon. What do you expect the pushback will be? And the way they will just say:

 

“No, you can’t do that!”

 

Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Just empty words. Just empty words. I think there’s probably less than a 10% chance they’ll be able to block us. I’m very confident it’s all going to go ahead. The black pillers need to be gassed! All the black pillers, just gas them!

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, no! And I’m not. When I bring, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not saying you’re black pilling.

 

Henrik Palgren: Sure. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: What I’m saying is there’s people online, I see comments every now and then where it’s like:

 

“They’re just gonna shut them down and make it illegal! And they’re all gonna go to jail!”

 

And it’s like, shut up! You’re either a jew or you’ve got your dick taped between your legs. Like, it’s just the most disgusting, demoralized, weak kind of energy. It’s so anti-Australian. Australians, we’re on a frontier we’re the frontier of the world and we’re surrounded on all sides by non-Whites. We’ve got a very harsh landscape, you know, we’ve allegedly got all these animals that try to kill us and to be like. And to be like:

 

“Oh, the government’s gonna shut us down, we can’t do anything!”

 

Is just the most weak cunt energy, like just fuck off! Go live somewhere else. This land is not built for weak cunts! This is hard cunt territory here and we don’t tolerate that shit! And those people, a lot of the time I think that they’re just jews. I think a lot of the time it’s just jews trying to sow fear in people that support us. The chances of the government blocking us is very low because they don’t have the framework to do it. They would have to nuke the whole system to do it. And are they prepared to do that? I don’t think they got the balls. I mean, you’ve got some rogue, really rogue politicians like Christopher Minns, who’s the New South Wales premier, saying that:

 

“He’s going to block the party and we’re not going to let this party come to power. And we’re going to dox all the members!”

 

And the AEC came out and made a statement saying:

 

“You can’t do that.”

 

And you’ve got like all these other Senators and all these other political leaders coming out and saying:

 

“Well, actually, we can’t do that. We have to let them. If they follow the rules, we have to let them.”

 

So it’s just basically kevtching like a bunch of losers. And it’s good. The more they kevtch, the better because it shows that they’re afraid and it doesn’t pass the pub test. And the average Aussie sees that on the news and goes:

 

“What? You want to ban this party? Why?”

 

And then they go on the website and they’re like:

 

“Oh, cool, I get all the interest paid off my mortgage and there’s less Indians. Fuck, that actually sounds all right!”

 

What we’re doing is really controversial from the concept that the country’s being destroyed by people that hate it! But it’s not controversial to the average Aussie, it really passes the pub test. And the idea that they want to ban it. The way the Australian psyche works is very clear. If the government wants to ban something, the average Aussie has this rebellious nature where they go:

 

“Why? Why does the government want to ban that?”

 

And they’ll look into it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, and that was my point, right? Bring it up. It’s a win-win regardless, right? It will expose the system or you actually have a foot in through the door. And either way it’s a plus.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re inevitable no matter what our strategy is. And we’ve got insurance policies, we’re not putting all our eggs in this one basket. But we see it as part of a matrix of power. And you can’t just build a political party. You have to build everything. It’s all about the back end. A political party is just, it’s not a front, but a political party it’s just the presence of power.

 

[1:49:50]

 

 

The real power of the Labor Party, for example, is not the Labor Party. It’s all the trade unions they control and all the non-White community groups that have all as a bloc joined the Labor Party, as a mosque, as a church, as a Chinese community center, as a, whatever it is.

 

Again, going back to the Liberal Party, whenever there is an influx of members in the Liberal Party because they just, every year they’re getting less and less and less members. But one branch might have an extra 200 members this year compared to last year. And how did that happen? How did that happen? How have they got 200 extra members? Well, we might have a friend, or a colleague or an associate that is, on paper, a member of that branch so that they can keep an eye on it. And they’ll tell us, they’ll report back to me and they’ll say:

 

“Oh, yep, some rich Chinese businessman just joined the party. He made a deal with the people that run that branch and he just got 200 of his laborers to sign up at the party.”

 

So he just signs up all the people that work for him and says:

 

“You have to do this. You work for me. You have to do this.”

 

Because they’re Chinese, they’ll just be like:

 

“Yes, sir.”

 

And they do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Yep, Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: And that’s the only way the Liberal Party or the Labor Party are getting these massive influxes. It’s just like rich Chinese or rich Indian businessmen or community leaders. The Chinese operate primarily through business, so they don’t have community leaders the way the Indians and the Muslims do, or the jews do. Well, the jews have both, obviously. They have business leaders and they have community leaders. But the Chinese, because they don’t have a religion and because they can’t organize as the, CCP, they organize as a front for the CCP, which is through CCP business here in Australia.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: And they bring in all their workers, they get their workers PR [Permanent Residency], then they get their workers citizenship, and then they start becoming a voting bloc.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: The hype is real! The Whites are leaving the major parties in droves, and the major parties are only retaining their numbers through the influx of browns.

 

And that’s why multiculturalism is their death rattle. That’s why they won’t ever give it up, because it’s the only way they can maintain their party.

 

So we’re forcing the dialectic. We’re heightening the contradictions. Everything that we’re doing is tactical. Everything we’re doing is strategic. And people for years have been saying:

 

“Oh, they’re wignats, they’re dumb, they don’t know what they’re doing. You got to join the Republican Party and you’ve got to subvert it from the inside.”

 

It’s like, these people are not creative thinkers and they’re not high IQ and they’re not morally courageous. The way you change the demographic destiny of the country is you have to schism the forces. And you have to put your flag up high. You have to raise the banner high! That’s the song. That’s the song! We’ve got the song, the Banner High!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, you got to raise the flag high and you got to say:

 

“Hello! Hello! We’re the Whites! We’re doing the White people thing!”

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. In America, that’s really hard! But it’s hard becauseyou guys haven’t laid the framework over the last 50 years, and we haven’t either. In Australia, we’re only picking this up. Well, there has been some that have tried, and obviously in America, people have tried, but we have built the meta-political energy that can be converted, or a portion of it can be converted into contesting a system that’s not a duopoly. You know, we’ve got that European style politics, but it wasn’t always like that. 20, 30 years ago we had the American style politics. The Greens were like 1% of the vote and that was like the third biggest party. Like you had the Australian Christians and you had like the Nationals, but the Nationals formed a coalition with the Liberals and then they became known as the Coalition.

 

And so you had like 95 plus percent of the vote in two parties. Now it’s like 70 or less. So it’s moving more and more into that European style and you have to just do the framework. So you just have to do the groundwork, you have to do the legwork.

 

Henrik Palgren: What I like about it is that it’s a different approach to it. Right. And you’re seeing that elsewhere too, that with numbers comes power and you build something else first as opposed to doing like, here’s a new political, well, who’s going to join a new political party, kind of thing. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, what caliber of people as well.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: How do you put a hierarchy?

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because there’s so much to do. I mean, yeah, we have a lot of people joining the party now that want to tell us what to do and they don’t want to be part of the organization.

 

So now we’re in a situation where we’re dealing with, well, how are we going to constitutionally frame the party and the organization together? Because there are a lot of people that are looking at the party and going:

 

“Holy shit! This could work!”

 

This not necessarily work in terms of take over the country, but this could become the third biggest party in the country quite quickly, or at least the fourth biggest party in the country quite quickly. This could be the Right-wing’s alternative to the Greens. And we could see One Nation form a coalition with the Liberal Party. But what we’re seeing is so much fracturing on the Right. We’re seeing a real contender on the Right coming out from the hardest possible position and they’re going:

 

“I’m going to get in this early.”

 

But they don’t want to be involved with the community. They don’t want to do the activism, they don’t want to do the push ups in the park, but they might have a good understanding of policy.

 

[1:55:14]

 

 

And so what we’re dealing with at the moment is having that conversation with these people and say:

 

“Hey, look, we’ll take your feedback. You can help advise us.”

 

I mean, depending on their skills, depending on what they are. But if you want to be a decision maker in the party, you have to join the order. And that’s rattling their minds a little bit because they’re used to:

 

“Oh, I joined the Liberal Party and I became the branch leader of the Liberal Party because I won a popularity contest.”

 

Or they join One Nation and same thing:

 

“Oh, I’ve joined this political party and I did this and I joined that political party. I did this.”

 

And then they’re joining our political party and then it doesn’t work like that.

 

And so that’s where we’re trying to balance democracy, which is an innate instinct of the public. They want to have a voice. They want to be involved and engaged in the process. But yeah, but at the same time, we’re a hierarchy. We’re building an order of men that are committed to fixing the country. And you have to be part of that order of men if you want to be within the leadership of the political party, or if you want to run as a candidate, for example.

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good.

 

All right, let me take some of these questions and comments here. Albert, first out the gates. Thank you so much, Albert. Huge dono. He says:

 

“Hi, Henrik. Looking forward to tonight show. Thomas Sewell is always one of my favorite guests. Especially looking forward to hearing his take on the Bondi beach shooting. Great show yesterday too. Take care.”

 

Thank you so much, Albert. We appreciate you so much. Thank you for your incredible support. Derek Rance, good to see you as well. Derek says:

 

“Thanks in advance for the show. It sounds like they are preparing Canada for the next extreme event to tighten the laws here.”

 

I’m sure they are. Good to see you, Derek, as always. Dercherso says:

 

“Good episode, good guest and good takes.”

 

Thank you, dear. Shabir, Gustav says:

 

“Hi Henrik. Finally able to catch the show live for change. Very impressive by Sewell.”

 

Yeah, we all are. Very good:

 

“Keep fighting the good fight, both of you.”

 

Thank you. Archie:

 

“Fascinating information. I missed the beginning. White power!”

 

Well, there you go. Thank you, Archie. Appreciate it. We got Alcion as well. Good to see you. Says:

 

“Happy to see Tom again. My question, Tom, so many of us around the world respect you tremendously and are taking notes from your group’s success. Do you think world jewery is hitting you especially hard because they understand your significance not just nationally, but globally?”

 

And he ends with:

 

“Hail Volk. Hail Red Ice and hail White Australia!”

 

Comments?

 

Thomas Sewell: World jewry has already done 99% of what it can do to us. And so now it’s got one left, one thing left to do to us. And I’m not sure if it’s prepared to do that one last thing. So there’s nothing more that it can do. I don’t have a bank account. I go into the bank, I can’t set one up. Yeah, I’ve been locked in solitary confinement. I’ve been framed, I’ve been imprisoned. You know, I’ve had unjust treatment through the courts. What else?

 

I mean, I’ve lost all the jobs. I can only work for friends now. The only work I can get is from people that are connected to our community, which is why building community is so important. You can’t just run away and hide from doxing for the rest of your life:

 

“I just don’t want to get doxed! I just don’t want to get doxed!”

 

That’s not a solution to the problem. That’s not even a band aid. That’s not even a band aid! Conflict avoidance doesn’t solve the problem.

 

The only way to solve the problem is insular communities, whether that’s big or small. Ideally, the bigger, the better. The bigger it is actually the more protected it is.

 

But we need to have communities. If you only know people on the Internet, you don’t even know their name. You’ve never even met their wife, you don’t even know what they do for work. Because people so worried about getting doxed, like everything’s hush hush, everything’s secret, like that’s the psyop! Not doxing yourself!

 

I mean, what more can the jews do other than kill me or try to kill me? I don’t know. There’s nothing more that they can do. There’s simply nothing that they haven’t already tried and failed. That they cannot stop what is coming. They cannot stop our determination, our will from triumphing. So well, it’s just assassination. That’s all they’ve got left.

 

So, Valhalla, here I come! I don’t care! I’m gonna keep going.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, I mean that’s the spirit you have to have, undoubtedly. And again it’s this is not gonna just go away. These sentiments, this mentality, the problems we’re faced with here and the reality of the situation is not just going to kind of morph into something else tomorrow on the Internet, because that’s a hip new topic to be into or something. I mean, this is not going away.

 

So, yeah, I’m with you. I think this is an inevitable trajectory for, again, I’m not saying the majority of White people, but a substantial enough portion of White people in order to make some real changes and clawing back control of our nations once again. I think it’s going to happen, you know, undoubtedly.

 

[2:00:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: I think it’s intergenerational as well. I think that in Australia this is the first time we’ve probably had an intergenerational movement here in Australia, which shows you how far behind we are from Europe. What I’m talking about is we’ve got the first generation of 18 year olds coming through now whose dads are members of the organization or have been for a long time. You know, so that is kind of embarrassing that it took to the year 2025 to have that.

 

I mean, the Muslims don’t have that issue. Like any Muslim you meet on the street. I’m pretty sure their dads are Muslim. I’m pretty sure their granddads are Muslim. I’m pretty sure their great granddad’s a Muslim. I’m pretty sure they’ve been organizing politically as Muslims for their entire existence.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: So as White people, we need to have intergenerational White nationalism. That’s the only way we’re going to survive.

 

So we’re finally seeing that now here in Australia. And there’s a lot of power in that. We’ve got young guys that are being brought up in the community and the government fears it, like the government at the moment, the thing that they were talking about the most on the media about us in the lead up to Bondi, before the Bondi thing happened, other than imprisoning me and imprisoning Joel Davis, was the home-schooling network. They are petrified at our home-schooling network! And we don’t even have much of a home-schooling network. It’s just in its infancy. Literally, it’s in its infancy. We’ve mostly got toddlers because most of the men in the organization are young men and we’ve only just started having kids in the last five years. So, we don’t even really have a proper home-schooling network set up. We’re just going with it. We can’t even send our kids to kindergarten anyway because you have to be vaccinated in Australia to send your kid to kindergarten.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a matter of necessity. It’s not just a matter of choice. It’s like even if we wanted to send our kids to kindergarten hypothetically, we actually legally can’t. We’d have to forge documents because our children are not allowed to go to kindergarten.

 

Henrik Palgren: Insane! Yeah. Homeschooling is banned in Sweden. Germany too.

 

Thomas Sewell: Of course.

 

Henrik Palgren: So no option. Incredible! Mr. Marsh Wood says:

 

“Hey, Tom, just want to say thank you for all what you guys are doing. I had a great time at the Victoria seminar and hope to attend more.”

 

He says. Do you have any comments? This was a local, for White Australia, the organization. That’s where you had the Victoria seminar?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we had it in Melbourne. So all the capital cities except for Sydney, New South Wales, had a seminar last weekend. So we’re syncing everything up and we released the policies for the first time on Saturday.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nice. Awesome! Based rat 1488 says:

 

“Hey, Tom, these conspiracy theories are opening the light to show that the jews are at fault for this attack either way, for funding the Australian government to spread multiculturalism in Australia. BR.”

 

Not sure if you have any comments on that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, sure. Of course the jews are behind multiculturalism in Australia. Yes. But I don’t think anyone in the media are talking about that. Like we are talking about it in our circles. But that’s very insulated.

 

And also you have to think tactically about it. You know, you can bring up that point. You can certainly approach that point. It could be considered a good time to approach that point. But the primary thing I believe that the movement needs to focus on when there’s a terror attack by Muslims against predominantly jews at Bondi beach, the primary point we need to come at it is that we don’t want either of these people here, that we want a sovereign country and that multiculturalism and the government are at fault. And yeah, I’m an anti-semite. I’m one of the most outspoken anti-semites in the fucking world! And I’m saying:

 

“Hey, guys, tactically it would be smart if we pile pressure on the government at this point. Like not to give away the tactic. But you gotta join the dog pile.”

 

Everyone’s attacking the government and for the right reasons or sometimes the wrong reasons. But, it’s not just all about, hey, let’s dogpile the jews while they’re being fucking shot. It’s like, look, there’s a time and a place to dogpile the jews, but it’s probably tactically smarter to dogpile the government when the jews are getting shot.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yes. About working with the energy, right? It’s like:

 

“No, no, it’s not the Muslims fault!”

 

You know, I’ve seen that too.

 

And that’s the thing with the:

 

“Well, that’s a false flag. The Manchester bombing was this or that.”

 

Thomas Sewell: These people have never met a Muslim!

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Anyone that’s met a Muslim. Look, I don’t know any Muslims. I’m living quite insular at the moment. But because I’m not allowed to go to a commercial gym. I get banned from every commercial gym I go to, but I don’t care! We’ve got our own gyms, but sometimes I like training at like proper fight gyms. But like some of the boys train at proper fight gyms and they’re saying to me that when it happened, all the Muslims at the fight gym are just like:

 

“Inshallah, brother, more dead jews. This is awesome!”

 

Just like openly in front of Aussies, in front of like multiculturalism. Like they don’t give a fuck l like the Muslims don’t give a fuck! All right. So they say:

 

“Oh this guy’s not a real Muslim!”

 

It’s like:

 

“Nah, you don’t understand where we’re at. It’s not 2000 fucking, … It’s not 1995 anymore. Like those days are fucking gone! It’s fucking race war! Everyone knows it.”

 

 

[2:05:46]

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right. Ghost Dogman says:

 

“Thomas is a great field expert on the Great War on Whites. I hope to see more from him on Red Ice TV. Free Joel!”

 

That’s right, Ghost Dogman. Thank you. J.C. Henderson, 94 says simply:

 

“Heil Red Ice. Heil Sewell. Thanks for doing what you’re doing.”

 

Well, thank you. Brian. 7316 says:

 

“Hi, and it’s great to see Tom on Red Ice again. He’s an Aussie hero. Like the Sewell’s charge against Antifa. Smiley face.”

 

There you go. Exactly! Very nice. Protector podcast:

 

“Hey Tom, I’m 15 year old from Australia that has been getting really into nationalism and National Socialism. I can’t join the NSN. I’m pretty. I’m a pretty tall and fit guy, at what age can I join?”

 

He’s asking you.

 

Thomas Sewell: As a general rule, we don’t accept applicants under the age of 16. Just as a general rule. Yeah, so.

 

Henrik Palgren: So you have to wait one year. Might just have to wait a year.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And even then between 16 and 18, we’re pretty discriminatory just because we don’t want to risk having someone join under the age of 18 that is a fucking, is an idiot! You know what I mean? We’ve had a lot of issues with people joining and not being honest to their parents.

 

And so we really only accept applicants under 18 now that have a good relationship with their parents. Because what we’ve got now is a whole state infrastructure set up where parents can now basically rat their children to the Stasi. And then it basically the parents can sign away their kid’s life to the government. So you know how like all that shit with like Britney Spears and how her dad like controlled her?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, unfortunately I do remember that. Yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Do you remember all that garbage? Yeah, it’s like it’s got a name to it. I can’t remember what the word is. But basically, if you’re under 18 and you join the Org and your parents are like full blown, like normgroid retards, they can basically call the government and be like:

 

“My son has joined NSN! He’s doing boxing at the park. Is he gonna be a terrorist?”

 

And then like a hysterical retard. And then basically the cops, then you’re just like chilling at home playing Minecraft or Roblox. And then the fucking feds rock up at your house and your parents let them in and then they come into your bedroom, they take your computer, they take your phone, they sit you down for like four hours and abuse you and tell you that you’re being brainwashed by maniacs:

 

“They’re gonna strap bombs to your chest and have you run at Muslims and have them blown up!”

 

And like just the most insane shit! Like some of these young lads that have had this, had to go through this, they’ve recorded the conversation. So I know what these piggies are saying to 16 year olds and how insane they are.

 

And I’ve listened to the most insane conversations where these piggies are saying like just the craziest shit to try to like brainwash these kids. They’re doing exactly what they’re accusing us of doing! They’re literally brainwashing these kids into believing the most insane shit, and then to make it even worse, your parents then sign off and you’ve got to do a de-radicalization course, which means you have a government friend now that comes and buys you KFC once a week and talks to you about your feelings for the next like year and a half. And you just don’t want to go through that! If you don’t have sick cunt parents, just fucking do your push ups, get a trade, finish high school, talk to your mates about this stuff. You know what I mean? And be careful how you talk to your mates about the stuff. Because a lot of guys that have reached out to the org, that aren’t in the org but have reached out and said:

 

“Hey, I’ve been forced to this DeRad thing, do I have to do it?”

 

And we say:

 

“Oh, what happened? Like, we’ve never heard of you. How are you on a DeRad thing?”

 

And they’ve said:

 

“Oh, I was talking about the Holocaust in class. And some kid in my class told the teacher and the teacher called the government and now I’ve got a government friend.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Fuck dude, like, you got to be careful!”

 

But [chuckling] like, the Zoomers aren’t careful. They say crazy shit at school and they don’t realize that the teachers are trained to inform on them, if they say anything remotely like nationalistic. So you got to be very careful if you’re a young guy.

 

But if your parents. Look, if your dad is willing to meet with myself or whoever the state leader is or whoever the region rep is, if your dad’s willing to meet with us, then yes, you can join at whatever age.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: But it’s basically like parental permission because, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: We just can’t be fucked dealing with the government.

 

Henrik Palgren: Like, sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a joke!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. All right.

 

[2:10:32]

 

Thomas Sewell: You can go to Drag Queen Story Hour, of course. Yeah, that’s fine. You can’t join the Nazi boxing club. We will strap a bomb to your chest, apparently, according to police, because that’s happened.

 

Henrik Palgren: I think that answered your second follow up, that Protector podcast too, in terms of what you can do to get involved more in that space.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, talk to your dad. Tell your dad why you want to join and go from there.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And if your dad’s cool with it. What a lot of the dads say to us, because we do have a lot of people under the age of 18 involved and what a lot of the dads say to us is:

 

“I just don’t want them doing activism.”

 

And we say:

 

“That’s cool! Activism isn’t compulsory. It’s not compulsory. He can come and train, but, yeah, he’s not allowed to do activism.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good. Canadian Girl Rumble says:

 

“Much love and support from Canada. Hail Sewell and the NSN!”

 

Thank you, Canadian Girl Rumble. Aussie autist 88, says:

 

“Preferred meal, butter chicken or tikka masala?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Butter chicken. [chuckling]

 

Henrik Palgren: Butter chicken. There you go.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re all going home. [chuckling] But we got the recipe!

 

Henrik Palgren: We got the recipe.

 

Thomas Sewell: Butter chicken is actually an ancient Aryan dish.

 

Henrik Palgren: Probably. Of course it is. Indo Aryan Oziotis again says:

 

“Our faggot ministers have zero vision. Zero vril. They are all so sterile and impotent. The vision of White Australia will go far!”

 

There you go. Thor’s Rune. Yeah, go ahead.

 

Thomas Sewell: Preach racist, preach!

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go.

 

Henrik Palgren: Thor’s Rune:

 

“Great discussion, great points laid out by Thomas. Standing strong for his nation and our people. Activism is no easy task in a politically hostile environment. Hail from SoCal!”

 

Southern California. Holy smokes. Get out of there if you can. Anyway, my condolences, but thank you, Thorstroom. Appreciate that. But the Bearded Indian says:

 

“Why do you think the Muslim retreated to the bridge instead of charging towards the crowds of targets?”

 

Well, he was on a vantage point. It was up high, obviously, so that was his best view, I would assume. What do you think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, same reason.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: They could cover each other from there.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, because his dad. Didn’t his dad have a shotgun? He was like the one who’s going to take care of there’s someone that’s approaching the son. The main shooter. That’s what he looked like to me anyway, But I’m not sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, and also the dad was fat and slow.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: So it’s just common sense. But anyway, what a silly question. Bearded Indian usually has good questions.

 

Henrik Palgren: Aussie autistic says:

 

“Hail Odin. Hail victory! Enjoy the solstice. Have a good Yuletide.”

 

Well, thank you. Exactly! That’s coming up here soon. The 21st.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’ve got midsummer this year.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, that’s right. You get Midsummer.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: So do you celebrate it upside down, too? Is that how you do it?

 

Thomas Sewell: We do, yeah. We hang out from the, …

 

Henrik Palgren: The Hanged Man.

 

Thomas Sewell: We hang from the trees.

 

Henrik Palgren: Odin.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, The Upside Down.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nine nights. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I sacrificed myself to myself.

 

Henrik Palgren: One eye patch when Randall Flag says:

 

“Thomas, Australia’s elite are primarily composed of old mining clans. From what I hear, they are the biggest turncoats who sold off your mines to the CCP. How do you propose on retaking your resources?”

 

Interesting question.

 

Thomas Sewell: At bayonet point!

 

Henrik Palgren: What?

 

Thomas Sewell: At bayonet point.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, there we go. Okay, well that explains it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So many people ask me:

 

“How are you going to do this? How are you going to do that?”

 

We’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting small things to hone in on. But I mean, it’s not small, I guess.

 

Thomas Sewell: But yeah, we’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: If there’s a will, I guess. Okay, we got one.

 

Thomas Sewell: The how we’re gonna do it? Well, when we’re close to it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, well, who knows?

 

Thomas Sewell: If you need to know, if you’re part of it, we’ll tell you, will be part of it.

 

Henrik Palgren: You will find out. How about that?

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s so many spectators. Imagine going down to the football match and you’re a spectator and you’re in the crowd. There’s like 10,000 people in the crowd and you’re just shouting at the coach:

 

“How are you gonna get that touchdown? How are you gonna do it?”

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s impossible!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s like:

 

“Shut up!”

 

You want to join the team? I’ll teach you. Join the team and I’ll teach you how we’re going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right. That’s a good answer.

 

Thomas Sewell: Sitting on the sideline:

 

“How are you going to do this?”

 

All right, we get why democracy is really gay.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, it’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Everyone wants a voice but no one wants to do the work. Everyone wants a voice, but no one wants to do it. The way it says, “rights without duties”, that’s the primary issue. So democracy that we’re going to build is “rights and duties”. You’ll get lots of rights, but you got to do the duties! You got to put your time in on the gun. They’re not inalienable:

 

“I’m born so therefore, hahaha, I get everything!”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how Rome collapsed.”

 

Because that just creates a fat, weak, retarded society. Look what happened to the Romans. They were born with the privilege of being a Roman citizen. They didn’t have to work for it anymore. They have to fight for it! They didn’t have to do any duty. They forgot their own religion, everything. It just deteriorated them, because they forgot how to just put in the work for the race.

 

[2:15:35]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, it’s so hard, right? You get success breeds complacency and comfort. And then out of that it’s so hard to motivate the younger people and the kids specifically, obviously, that grow up in that. Right. They have the abundance, the affluence. It’s extremely hard. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Someone asked me:

 

“How are we going to take back the Commonwealth Bank?”

 

Henrik Palgren: Is [chuckling] that the priority?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, but we’re going to do it. We are going to do it. That’s part of policy too. It’s like we’re just going to take ownership of it:

 

“What do you mean, but how are you going to do it?”

 

We’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Trust the plan. All right, how about that?

 

Thomas Sewell: What do you want? You want me to write like a 300 page essay on, like, how we’re going to manage all the branches?

 

Henrik Palgren: Needed in writing Tom. Right now!

 

Thomas Sewell: How did they sell it? Did the guy that sold it off, did he write a 300 page? He probably did. Knowing democracy.

 

Henrik Palgren: Legalese wise. Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, they just sold it to their mates. They just got rid of it. They just sold it to their mates. They just had friends. And now it’s 1.3 trillion in the private sector and it was a state asset. They just gave it to their mates.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. Of course!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re just going to take it back!

 

Henrik Palgren: When do they do that by the way?

 

Thomas Sewell: 1996.

 

Henrik Palgren: 96, okay, interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: They just gave it to their mates. That’s what they did. They gave it to their mates. They gave it to their jewish mates.

 

Henrik Palgren: Of course. Okay, we got one more here. Alufaltruda, if I say that correctly:

 

“What would you say to men who want to participate in the inner activism part of White Australia but aren’t yet physically fit? Would you allow fat guys or twigs to join the park training?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we have fat guys and skinny guys at training. Yeah, we do. Like the fitness testing is not:

 

“Hey, you can’t hang out with us, associate with us or train with us if you don’t pass this testing.”

 

That’s not how the testing works. The testing works is we’ve got a hierarchy where you don’t become an official member. There’s like a process where you go through like an initiation phase, like the bikies would call it, like a prospecting phase, like at work it might be called a trainee phase. You go through your apprenticeship, you go through like a trainee phase where you do six months and then you get promoted and you do another six months and you get promoted. But at those promotions you have to meet certain fitness standards.

 

So there’s some guys that have been in the org three years and they haven’t been promoted because they have never worked on their fitness. They just come once a month, they hang out, they stand at the barbecue, they have a cigarette and you know what I mean, it’s like they’re a minority. They’re in the minority. There’s only a couple guys that do that it’s not a good culture if there was a whole bunch doing it. But when it’s just a couple guys coming down, they can keep an eye on things. They can do a bit of security, they can check license plates, they can help with the vetting. You know, they can be part of other operations that not everyone has to train.

 

But again, it is what it is. Different horses. We got Sausage Turners we got security guards, we got all sorts of people.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right, the Bearded Indian has a second go here. I guess he must do a better question.

 

Thomas Sewell: Let’s go round two.

 

Henrik Palgren: NSN must publicize the shit out of this. Every politician who promoted diversity is responsible for the mass murder. Job for the clippers to tether those politicians face together.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah. Now the online warfare is really important. And I mean the politicians, their reaction, I mean Burke, Marles and Albo, they are shaking! They are shaking in their boots. You can hear it in their voice. They got gay lisps. I mean, it is embarrassing!

 

I mean, there’s one video. You got to play it quickly. You got to play it quickly. I’ll find it, I’ll send it. I’ll DM it to you.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’ve got to play this video. Oh, it is embarrassing!

 

Henrik Palgren: I’ll take the other one here.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is Australia’s Defense Minister.

 

Henrik Palgren: Find that there.

 

Thomas Sewell: I found it. I found it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, yeah, send it to me. I’ll pull it up here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Check your DMs. You got to play this video.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, it’s through. Okay, let me save that down real quick there then. We’ll get that one.

 

Of course I got some, the Rumble channel up in the meantime here as well. Well, I download that for White Australia. You guys are obviously on the main website. There is WhiteAustralia.org or simply WhiteAus. I think you can go to as well, dot org to get to the website.

 

[2:19:54]

 

Thomas Sewell: They both redirect. There’s a whole bunch of things that redirect to White Australia.org.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, here we go. Let’s see if that downloaded here. I’m going to import that down properly. Doesn’t seem like it hopefully works. No file format. Oh, it’s still downloading. It’s slow as hell! Okay. Also in the meantime that. Well, I’m just waiting for that. Just be a couple of seconds. There’s a Telegram page obviously for White Australia as well. Then you have your personal one. Tom Sewell uncensored on Telegram. Any other social media links website where people can, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I got a Gab. Thomas underscore Sewell. But I just don’t use it. I need to, but I just keep forgetting. But Gab feels pretty dead lately. I don’t know. We’re banned from Twitter.

 

Next year I’m gonna try to get on Twitter and Instagram and just see how long I last. But we’re going to launch the policy parties first. I’ve got a list of priorities and then I’m going to just do like I’m going to spam videos and social media stuff and if I get a week, I’ll be really happy.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, here’s the clip. It’s down on Defense Minister Richard Marles. Here’s his comments. Check it out.

 

Sky News: Do you feel like there needs to be and should there be a greater emphasis on hate speech from Muslim clerics in the Western part of Sydney?

Richard Marles: I think. Look, I think as I said earlier, what we’ve done is criminalize more forms of hate speech, and we’ve criminalized the Nazi salute. Obviously that’s in its own context, but we need to be looking at all of this. And it is really important that we have., …

Sky News: So should there be a greater emphasis on this hate speech from Muslim clerics, then?

Richard Marles: I don’t want to. We will go through all of this. I emphasize that we have done more in terms of criminalising hate speech than we have seen from any other government. But we need to look at all of this and we need to make sure that we’ve got the right laws in place and that we are doing everything we can to keep safe that the vibrant multicultural society, …

 

Henrik Palgren: There it is! [chuckling] There it is! Oh, my gosh! All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Please, please, Yahweh, send me your gayest, most retarded enemies. [chuckling]

 

Henrik Palgren: That is funny!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s Defense Minister of Australia, a gay retard!

 

Henrik Palgren: He seems genuinely rattled!

 

Thomas Sewell: Tony Burke has got like this high pitched, I’ve never heard his voice go high pitch before. Tony Burke is like. He’s got like the fear complex at the moment when the media are asking questions. And he got booed. He came down to the memorial and the jews all booed him. And this is the guy that deported a neo-Nazi for the jews! And the jews are booing him.

 

Henrik Palgren: Doesn’t matter. Yep, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: You deports Nazis, but you didn’t deport the Muslims.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, they do that right, though. And it sounds like:

 

“Yeah, you’ve been very good. You did this great. We’re very happy!”

 

No, at that point, you have the opportunity to push really hard to get just much more of what you want. And how do you want the politicians to act for you on behalf of you? They know how to do that. Okay, we got two more here, Tom, before we let you go here. Line Crosses said:

 

“The police must have had so many angles on those shooters. Shooters were exposed, evident by the many camera angles on them. Sloppy.”

 

I mean, I heard one rabbi there, they interviewed him was like:

 

“It must have been 20 minutes.”

 

Or something. And it’s like. I don’t think it was 20 minutes. It probably felt like 20 minutes for the people that were there. But five maybe, I don’t know, maybe 10, I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, it was almost 10. It was almost 10 minutes. Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Which is a long time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Which is way too long. Like Bondi, the traffic’s bad, but there’s always cops at Bondi Beach. I’ve never not seen cops at Bondi Beach. I’ve always seen police at Bondi beach, usually in teams of two or teams of four.

 

So the fact that it took 10 minutes to get to the shooting, to resolve the shooting, and took probably I don’t know, five minutes to get there. There’s video footage of cops driving past the bridge. So they had an angle to shoot out the window up that bridge. There’s cops driving past and they didn’t stop. They just kept going. So, yeah, despicable!

 

But fat Chungus. Not the Chungus that arrested Joel, but another Chungus was the one that got the killer shot on the dad. Really small Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. There’s footage of the Chungus. There was a fat Chungus cop that got the shot off. So he wasn’t a beat cop. He was in a suit. So that just shows you know, there’s cops in dress shirts walking around, right?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

[2:24:50]

 

Thomas Sewell: How did he get there? How did he get there before the cops that were in uniform. He’s not wearing a bulletproof vest either.

 

So the cop that got the shot off was just a fat Chungus from the office that might have been just getting lunch. I don’t know the story yet. But another interesting thing that I forgot to mention was the media, because a whole bunch of lifeguards tried to assist in the process as well. And there was lifeguards that were there on the scene before the cops got there, as well as the Aussies that just like stomped the two guys on the ground on the bridge. But there was a guy trying to read out the names of the lifeguards that had helped save people’s lives. And helped try to deal with it. And the media wouldn’t let this guy read out the names of the lifeguards. Because the media here in Australia, all they’re saying on the news is just:

 

“Look at this brown guy that saved the day! Look at this jewish guy that saved the day. Look at all these heroes of multiculturalism!”

 

And it’s like, they won’t read out the names. And they’re like:

 

“His name was Al Hamid Muhammad!”

 

And then they just say it like 20 times.

 

So, yeah, you turn on the news and it’s like:

 

“And the hero was Al Hamid Muhammad!”

 

And it’s just, on repeat, on repeat, on repeat!

 

And it’s like, they wouldn’t let a guy read out the names of the lifeguards that tried to help because it’s like Ben Stewart, Thomas Stevens. You know what I mean?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, exactly! Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: All Aussie names.

 

Henrik Palgren: I mean, the solution, therefore, is:

 

“Let’s bring in a million more Muslims to protect us from the Muslims!”

 

Right? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: We need migrants to stop us from migrants!

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly! See, the good ones cancel out the bad ones, I guess, but they kill White Australians in the process, obviously. Yeah. People are asking chat here:

 

“What’s a chungus? Chubby, thick, large?”

 

Is that the definition?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Chungus is like a big fat chungus. You know, like a Big Chungus. It was like, I’ll just Google it. Big chungus. They don’t know the Big Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s like the, … Bugs Bunny! Exactly! Yeah, that’s the bunny. Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: If you don’t know the Big Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: Home of the Brave says:

 

“The most white pilling is listening to Tom Sewell. Absolutely no one wants to step up in America, so I guess I’m gonna have to do it!”

 

Well, that’s the spirit. That is not true, by the way. But that’s the spirit obviously. If you don’t think anyone does, then, yeah, you do it:

 

“Thanks for giving me hope and vectorizing the Vril.”

 

Hail home of the brave.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I get a lot of DMs from Americans and they all want to be Australia’s Thomas Sewell. Sorry, America’s Thomas Sewell. I get a lot of DMs. I get a lot of people unsolicited in the DMs on Telegram and they’re like:

 

“Check out my page, Tom. I’m the next Thomas Sewell!”

 

And then I check out the page and it’s got two subscribers. And I’m like:

 

“Dude, I’m not going to be your third subscriber. I’m sorry, you’re going to have to put your time on the gun. You have to build up a bit of a following yourself.”

 

They’re like:

 

“Tom, can you share my page? I’m America’s Thomas Sewell!”

 

No, you’re not. You’re unfortunately not. I’m sorry.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, we got another Thomas. Does a good job. Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s Hammer. There’s all sorts of guys. There’s lots of guys in America. There’s a lot of guys that are not necessarily like doxed, like not name fagging, as they say on the chins. There’s a lot of guys that just, they just put in the work. They just build the active club or they build their organization. You know, they just put their folk first and they do it without the glory. And yeah, also a little bit off topic. I was in jail, so no one told me. No one told me Chris Cantwell’s a faggot! What the fuck happened? What the fuck is going on?

 

Henrik Palgren: I don’t wanna, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He sent me a message like a week ago. He’s like:

 

“Hey, man, can you share this post for me?”

 

And I’m like, I didn’t say:

 

“Yeah, all right.”

 

But I was like, in my head:

 

“Yeah, all right.”

 

But I always read everything first before I share. Always. And I’m like scrolling through and it was like something about gay sex. And I was like:

 

“Hang on a minute. What the fuck!”

 

And then I read it again and I replied to him:

 

“Chris, what the fuck are you talking about?”

 

And then I sent it to the boys and they’re like:

 

“Yeah, bro, did you not know?”

 

I was like:

 

“No one told me. I was in prison. No one told me!”

 

And then I went through his page and he was like:

 

“When I was 14, I had sex with a man. He wasn’t attractive.”

 

It’s like:

 

“What the fuck Chris, you fucking weird cunt!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Imagine that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Holy shit! He fell off.

 

Henrik Palgren: Imagine that!

 

Thomas Sewell: He was a bit of an oddball, but fuck, he fell off.

 

Henrik Palgren: Some things kind of makes sense.

 

Thomas Sewell: Eric Striker likes biting my ankles. I hope he’s biting Chris Cantwell’s ankles. Hopefully he doesn’t get AIDS.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, that’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Why are people having a go at me when there’s cunts like that! I should be, …

 

Henrik Palgren: I don’t think anyone’s giving him a pass, to be honest.

 

But yeah, I get your point.

 

[2:30:01]

 

Thomas Sewell: No one’s giving him a pass, but how did that fucking slip through to the keeper? Someone must have known!

 

Henrik Palgren: Probably.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, that’s one of our vetting questions. You know, that’s one of our vetting questions is that:

 

“If someone tells you in secret something like that, would you share it with other people? Or would you keep it a secret?”

 

That’s one of our vetting questions.

 

Henrik Palgren: When did you start being gay? That’s the vetting question. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! [chuckling] I shouldn’t be giving away our vetting questions. Antifa’s probably got through stage one. They just probably don’t get stage two or stage three. But like, that’s in stage one. Like, are you a fag sympathizer? We don’t want you. That’s how we got this problem in the first place.

 

Henrik Palgren: I’m sure they answer honestly on that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because in politics, there’s not many forces worse than gays. Like, there’s jews. Jews are worse! But like gays are fucked! They’re insidious. They’re absolutely insidious. They have to be just completely rooted out of every single organization. That’s how politics have been taken over. Like people that can be blackmailed. You know what I mean?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And yeah, gays are all ashamed of themselves. That’s why they have to take drugs to do it. They’re freaks! They’re disgusting freaks! There’s no normal gays. There’s no such thing as a normal gay. They’re all freaks! Don’t associate with them. Anyone that associates with gays, I don’t associate with them.

 

Henrik Palgren: I agree.

 

Thomas Sewell: Even straight people. I just can’t tolerate anyone that’s like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a gay friend.”

 

Like:

 

“Nuke! See you later. Don’t talk to me again. Do not contact. Lose this number.”

 

Henrik Palgren: We got Line Cross:

 

“Small fat chungus has the most testosterone in the force.”

 

Yeah, that’s interesting. Isn’t that interesting? Megawatts 80:

 

“Hi, Tom!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Hi.

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go. I was waiting for a hi back. Line Cross again:

 

“I can’t help but imagine the media crap storm if a member or two of the NSN was there and foiled that attack.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, they probably wouldn’t have done much except get shotgun to the face!

 

Henrik Palgren: Taking them out too.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I mean, to be fair, that one guy did disarm the fat chungus that ran down. It didn’t even make sense. Anyway, I won’t go into.

 

Henrik Palgren: Rob Jasimer here says:

 

“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children!”

 

Correct. Thank you, Rob.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. All right.

 

Henrik Palgren: I think we’re caught up there. Thank you, Tom, so much for joining us today. I appreciate it. Always pleasure talking to you. Keep up the good work, the excellent work, the fantastic work you’re doing down there. We’re all watching and very interested in the development, not only, of course, the political kind of faction of this, the arm, the wing of what you’re doing, obviously, but yeah, it’s always a pleasure having you on, man! And anything else, closing thoughts you want to run through here before we wrap up for today?

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna win! Yeah, I don’t have a closing spiel. I think I’ve said a lot today and yeah, just gas all the black pillers! Just don’t associate with black pillers. The worst humans in this movement are the black pillers. Just don’t associate with them. They’re like a social disease in the movement. And we have made so much progress over the years because we just gas the black pillers! We just get rid of them. We just don’t associate with them.

 

Now, you can be a critic, and you can be a fair critic and you can be realistic.

 

Henrik Palgren: You want that part of it for sure. Shoot holes in everything. Right? But, …

 

Thomas Sewell: But you don’t want people that by their very nature they’re unhappy, they’re unlucky, they’re pessimistic. Don’t associate with these kinds of people because they will destroy your clique. They will destroy your movement, they will destroy your business, they will destroy your organization, they will destroy your family. Don’t associate with fundamentally unhappy, weak willed people! Just don’t associate with them. They’re just the chaff. You know what I mean? They’re just the chaff and they’re not going to make it. They’re just not going to make it.

 

And all the progress we have made as an organization has been this “triumph of the will”. You, when you get involved and you do five years or even less, like maybe within two or three years you might start to feel, you might feel the energy. Like you can feel the winds of change or the vibrations or whatever is. You can feel it and you can feel that progress coming from just these high vril, high energy like people, men and women, it’s male and female energy, in different ways. It’s obviously predominantly male energy in the movement. But that energy, that high virile energy, like there’s so many face doxed people, there’s so many people that aren’t face doxed, but they work really hard behind the scenes and they just love it! You’ve just got to love it! You’ve got to learn to love the struggle. You’ve got to learn to love this battle we’re in. And when you’re faced with adversity, you should always just see it as a challenge. You should always just see it as:

 

“Oh, that’s what they’re throwing at us now. Oh, that’s where my life’s at now!”

 

Just take a step back, breathe, calm down, get your bearings and get stuck back in. Get back to work! And yeah, that’s the success of my organization. I don’t tolerate it. We just get rid of you.

 

And that’s why we’re growing. There was a point where we got stuck at 20, 30 guys. And building a little active club with five guys is pretty easy. It’s really easy. Almost everyone can do it. Almost anyone that’s not a retard can do it. You can build four or five guys in an active club. When you get to 20 to 30 guys, it becomes very difficult. You really need to have some leadership qualities.

 

[2:36:06]

 

But also you start to realize that not all 20 to 30 men are equal. And that you need to have a really good core. You need to have people that really have good energy and good commitment level and they’re there for the right reasons. They’re not just loser freaks that hate society and are looking for any kind of vagrant group to attach themselves to. You want to just stay clear of the loser freaks! You just don’t want losers! That doesn’t mean everyone has to be as corporate or like high paid or like big earner, tradesman, driving a nice car.

 

It’s not about status and it’s not about money. It’s about work ethic, it’s about integrity. Yeah, that’s way more important, that’s way more important than money. Don’t think that it’s about money. It’s got nothing to do with money. You’ll find that there’s lots of people with money that have really bad work ethic. They just know the right people, they went to the right school, their dad’s friends are wealthy, blah blah, blah. And that’s why they drive a $200,000 car.

 

Whereas there’s men driving around five thousand dollar cars and they got a great work ethic. They’re hustlers and not in a gay cringe, corporate capitalist mindset, in terms of a political mindset. They get home, they’re video editing, they’re doing shit, they’re on Twitter, they’re Twitter maxing, they’re in the gym, they’re fighting.

 

Okay, so what? They drive a $5,000 a car, who cares? You know what I mean? Like they got a good work ethic.

 

So yeah, you want to surround yourself with people that are willing to work for nationalism. They’re willing to put in the work. And pessimists and black pillers, they just want to sit there and just sink the boat, you know, Imagine you’re on a journey, you’re on a mission. You want cunts on the fucking oars! Get on the fucking oars! Let’s go!

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct. Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And if you’ve got a skill, if you can navigate, if you can navigate, you got to first do your time on the fucking oars. We don’t need all this dead weight on the boat saying:

 

“Oh, we should go this way or we should go that way!”

 

Shut up! Get on the oar. All right.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Learn to work as a team first. Right? Kind of thing.

 

Thomas Sewell: And get in the rhythm.

 

Henrik Palgren: Get your individuality, your emotions to the side. Just get rid of all of that and create a unit that can cooperate and then from there you can do that.

 

And as you said, I mean, yeah, you should surround yourself with people that are smarter than you, that are better than you, they know more than you. And that creates an environment where you are all feeding off each other. You grow, you become better.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And you should lift people up that aren’t.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, 100%.

 

Thomas Sewell: But don’t waste time on people that are fundamentally broken. And the younger you are, the more time you waste on broken people. When I was young, I wasted years on broken people trying to help them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And yeah, as Adolf Hitler says:

 

“God helps no one that doesn’t help themselves. And German people, help yourselves!”

 

And I believe that about us as Aryans, as White people. Like we need to help ourselves. And yeah you don’t want to like cut off people too quickly. You want to give people time. Some people take six months, some people 12 months.

 

But yeah, you’re not always going to find yourself surrounded by people that are making more money than you or that are smarter than you or whatever. Sometimes you’re going to find yourself surrounded by people that are are less fit than you and, or, whatever the metric is that you’re measuring. And yeah, what mateship is about is about lifting up the guys around you know, and a good amount of positive bullying, a good amount of positive work. Inclusive bullying.

 

Henrik Palgren: Shaming and bullying works 100%.

 

Thomas Sewell: Lift up the guys around you. That’s one way that an organization grows is that guys join and it’s not that you’re joining a self improvement society. Go join the Freemasons if that’s what you’re looking for! You know what I mean? Like our organization, the purpose of it isn’t a self improvement society, but I do believe that’s a side effect on it.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s a positive side effect of it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! Yeah. It’s a side effect of brotherhood.

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a side effect of an effective brotherhood. All effective brotherhoods are do that. And what we have at the moment is like veterans organizations and men’s clubs and stuff like that. They’re all just like pity parties. I don’t go to them because I know that they’re gay as fuck, but I know people that go to these like guys that I was in the army with and you know, tradesmen, they go to these like groups that aren’t our group. They go to these like socially approved groups after work and it’s just like they’re just getting lectured by some faggot about toxic masculinity. And it’s just like:

 

“How do you fucking put up with this? Like you don’t need friends that bad, dude. Like, just go to the gym!”

 

[2:40:44]

 

Henrik Palgren: Just making friends there, nothing else.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, like a lot of the veterans organizations, for example, a bit off topic, but a lot of them are just that what you feed grows pity parties. They’re just like:

 

“Oh, I have nightmares.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s just like, fuck, man!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

At some point you have to like a new vision, Focus on something new, fresh. And I know it sucks! I’m not trying to diminish it. But I’m saying also at some point you got to kind of keep busy, right? You got to get active and busy.

 

Thomas Sewell: If you’ve got depression, for example, and you go to the depression week and you’re like:

 

“I’m so depressed I can’t get out of bed in the morning!”

 

Is that ever going to fix the problem?

 

Henrik Palgren: No, no, it’s not.

 

Thomas Sewell: You just need a fucking injection of Vril!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep, Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just get out of fucking bed. Find a purpose.

 

But yeah, anyway, I’ve said enough.

 

Henrik Palgren: No, no, it’s all good. All good. Dr. Jenstein:

 

“Thanks guys. Great stream!”

 

Yeah, I really appreciate it. Great conversation, Tom, as always, I appreciate you. And again, thanks. Salute to all of you and the guys over there. Hope Joel gets out soon.

 

And as always, of course, …

 

Thomas Sewell: 23rd, hopefully.

 

Henrik Palgren: 23rd. Oh, really? Okay. So day before Yule. Okay, nice.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, a week.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right, well, say hi to him from us here at Red Ice. We’re thinking of him.

 

All right, Tom, have a great Yule. Christmas done. Coming up here shortly, soon.

 

Thomas Sewell: Thank you for having me.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right.

 

And obviously I suppose you say Australia for the White man! We’ll see you later, Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: The rest must go!

 

Henrik Palgren: The rest must go. [chuckling] There you go.

 

All right, cheers. Take care. Thanks.

 

All right, guys, there we go. Thank you so much to Tom again for joining us. We appreciate you.

 

All right, we’re gonna wrap up right there. I do want to say thanks to our executive producers though, before we let you go, but a little plug here for tomorrow. We’re talking with Sven Longshanks and of course he was imprisoned by the UK system for essentially podcasting. That will be live at 2 PM Eastern, which is 8 o’ clock Central European time. Eight in the evening, obviously. We got Flashback Friday coming up on Friday.

 

After that, 5 PM Eastern. That’s 11 in the evening, 2300 hours Central European time. And then we’ll take a little break about a week or so. we’ll take a little yule break and then we’ll be back with more after that, obviously, but a few more shows before we take a break. So also before we wrap up here, where are you guys? Where do we want to find my executive producers? You’re hiding somewhere. Great way to support us, of course, is to get a membership. I can do that plug while I’m looking for that too. Redicemembers.com we have Red Icetv.locals.com subscribestar.com Redice. 10 bucks a month helps us tremendously. Might not make that much of a big, big difference to you individually, but the more of you guys who do it helps us tremendously. So we can continue to do this and do more and do better and do all the things we want to do. So do consider it.

 

And by the way, if you do want to get a, if you want to get that down, it’s about 10 bucks a month. But if you get a longer sub@redismembers.com you can get it all the way up to two years. That gives you about 20, sorry, 35, almost 40% off. So that’s a great way to save a little bit as well. Gets cheaper per month that way.

 

Here we go. Here’s our executive producers for today as well. Albert. Arctic Wolf, first out the gates. Thank you so much, Albert, for your incredible support. We have William Fox from America First Books as well. Thank you, William. We got Angry White Soccer Mom. Thank you for your support.

 

We also have Purple Haze. Thank you for being an executive producer. And we got Glenn. Thank you, Glenn. Appreciate your support as well. Also Down Under, I believe. Thank you, Glenn. We got Red Pill Rundown. Thank you for being there for us so we can be there for you. We got President Obunga. Thank you for your support as well. Then we got Teutonic Werebear. We’re appreciate you. Thank you Werebear.

 

We got Good Luck Lap. Thank you so much for your support. We have number one, Jeeves. We appreciate you as well. Thank you. Then we got Hungarian Mom. Thank you to the whole family. We appreciate your support. We also have Santoso. Thank you, Santoso for your support. I’m starting to Lisp a bit, the Australian politicians are rubbing off! Sun Destroyer 520. Thank you. Appreciate it. We also have the Deplorable Extraordinaire. Thank you for your support. And the Booman, our latest edition for the executive producers.

 

Then we have Charles Turner Jr Johansson, Lero Dumont. Eyes open single action army, Lord H.P. Lovecraft. We have Trevor, Der Schwabe, Alcyon, Aurelion, Perfect Brute, Greg M J Barr, Chris W and Skarzinski. That’s our producers. You guys are like five subscribers so thank you so much! Our executive producers are like 10 so we appreciate you guys tremendously. Thank you once again. If you want a shout out at the end of the show, special thanks from us at Red Ice. Go to RedIcemembers.com or subscribestar.com Red Ice and get one of those tiers.

 

All right guys, that’s it done for us today. Thank you so much for joining us again. Thanks to Tom. Great show as always. We’ll be back tomorrow with Sven Longshanks actually. Folk first ladies and gentlemen. We’ll see you tomorrow.

 

Now do make sure that you follow us on our Rumble channel for more Red Ice TV on Rumble.com or on X @redice TV. You can of course go to Redice dot TV as well. Tune in to our live streams and shows. Flashback Friday live on Fridays at 5 PM Eastern. No go zone Wednesdays at 5 PM Eastern. We also do interviews, videos, clips and Western Warrior is available Tuesdays exclusive for our supporters and subscribers@redicemembers.com or on our locals Red Icetv.locals.com or subscribestar.com slash Red Ice get a membership, check out everything that we do and support the show.

 

 

[2:46:29]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 12/30/2025 = 107)

107 Comments – Latest at top

BeornBeorning
5 hours ago
Great guest!

RestitutorOrbis1028
VerifiedLocals Supporter
2 days ago
Australia was batshit crazy & cruel during Cοvid; I will never forget it. Ontario & British Columbia (Canada) come in close behind.

Soozysuz
Supporter
3 days ago
Also the government are so dumb, they don’t even know they have created this right wing movement. There’s no stopping it when they have forced us into this situation. If they weren’t over controlling fuckheads, we could all be living in peace and enjoying life.

Soozysuz
Supporter
3 days ago
The government are terrified of you guys. After your speech at MFA in August, I had to find out what you were all about, brocade it certainly wasn’t what they were trying to tell us. If been a keen listener ever since. As a woman in my mid 50’s it makes me so happy to see strong young men prepared to do what it takes to take this country back. I grew up in the best times and never imagined we’d be where we are now. Australia is barely recognisable. I really hope we can turn this ship around Hail

6millionbagels
3 days ago
Brilliant interview

Jaymeo1
4 days ago
Tom is the future

Bee1970Something
4 days ago
Israel and their puppets keep causing bullshit and the current so-called leaders all fleece us for this greed

PansophicGothi
4 days ago
Greg Johnson is a normal gay man, and Joel Davis did a live stream with him in 2025. I get the tendency to act like zero tolerance, but that doesn’t really mesh with reality, it’s usually more complicated and nuanced. (Chris Cantwell went off the deep end though.)
1
0

BeornBeorning
5 days ago
“…doing everything we can to keep safe the vibrant multicultural society…” LMAO
1
0

Lueger
6 days ago
41:00 Striker and those around him have no f’g idea about the obnoxiousness of the mohammedans in Europe and everywhere else they exist outside of the US. The Jew-S has traditionally filtered out the above-average to below-average sorts and allowed in only the absolute top-level, unislamic intellectuals. I went to Europe as a convinced opponent of semitism, and learned in Europe that opposition to semitism must include opposition to all semites. Jew and arab alike have an ideology of perpetual innocence, mixed with an inclination to communism and lasciviousness. They are both disgusting and should properly be confined to their deserts, pushed off of the coasts of the eastern Mediterranean.

Vasili1
6 days ago
you may be interested in watching– Jews in Australia 2 – Ernie Rolando Dec 2025 (+ Critical Race Theory) https://www.bitchute.com/video/KbCDmGx8xsOK

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Ah you’re an anti-semite (You said that around 2 hours in). Well I guess that means I should go and protect the real Whites then, the negative blood types (myself inclusive). Jews aren’t the real semites, but if you have all connection with Christ by blood well then we negative blood types deserve better than being annihilated by the jews, directly targeted and abused not only by people on Earth, but wondering why almost all our lives we’re being targeted by demons and fallen angels so much and jews trying to replace us and then also annihilated potentially by neo nazi’s and replaced there too? I’ve cried deeply enough, shed enough blood and sweat. We’ve gone through enough us negative blood types, don’t deserve attacks instead of being cherished and protected and also considering how much we’ve also done, which means none of you would be here otherwise to even be able to fight. Most of us didn’t even know that we were blood of Christ and his ancestors until only a few years ago, even though the jews have known and tried to cover it up all along. I’ve connected with negative blood types the last few years and they’ve all pretty much said the same thing, we’re being hunted more so than anyone else in the world and almost all I spoke to were Christian or I didn’t know and I’ve spoken to quite a few groups. I’m against multiculturalism of all non-Whites with Europeans, Scandinavians (Greenland inclusive) and Whites I don’t know how it’s going to go with you lot not accepting we’re actually the real Whites if that’s how you’re going about it. I’d like an apology at least from the UK people from hating on me throughout school when I was a little girl because they were fucking racist against Polish people and framing Polish people for what the nazi’s or rather the jews actually did. Sick. I think there’s clear reason, negative blood types have to protect our own community worldwide. I might as well go pass on the msg because I don’t need anyone not being loyal to us.

‹ Hide 1 reply
boicotinho2
1 week ago
lmao, “the jews arent the real jews”. what a nonsense
1
1

‹ Hide 2 replies
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
“What a nonsense?” lol Have a look at yourself in the mirror and then you’ll see what real nonsense looks like. If you want to be roasted, mate, I have all day and shit ton load of experience, (no pun intended and frankly it ain’t shit but since you’re so literal worse than an actual autistic then lets go with heap ton load instead). I’ve grown and healed through these time loops like you can’t imagine despite the BS torture I’ve had to endure. You’ll tire out quicker than it takes a cork to blow from a shaken up bottle of cheap sparkling (not even champagne). Jews are not the real line of Christ and his ancestors. Happy? I can’t fucking edit these posts and they allow only 2,000 characters as you well know so it doesn’t let me say everything to a dumbass like you. People with half a brain or holes in it know what I’m saying, you can’t, you’re that retarded? I don’t have time nor energy for shitty connection, do better. Be kind, instead, takes healing. You eating your wild blueberries? (Clearly not).

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
he’s obviously unhinged, pity the poor minded
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Sorry for the many posts but each post only allows 2,000 characters. So it’s not just the demons that need to be killed, it’s also the fallen angels. If we don’t kill the core of the problem, those fallen will just manipulate people on Earth again, get them accepting & loving their demons & doing sick shit like they did at the Colosseum. According to Anthony William attacking family members because they were forced to while the whole stadium was screaming. Plus people doing things like what they are today, today’s style canaanite. Joshua, Saul & David (those negative blood types) killed all these jews that went rancid because God directed them to. This is a battle that’s been going on for thousands of years but for some reason what is God waiting for with the fallen? How is it that our God tells Joshua NKJV 7:10-12 to kill the filth amongst him & won’t be with Joshua unless he does, yet Jesus our God doesn’t kill all the filth amongst his realm & the spiritual. We have to investigate further what’s going on here. Either way, the audiobook is: “Angels, Demons and Spiritual Tools,” you can get it on Spotify as well. Takes 7 hours to listen, about 10min a day to do the excersizes even if you don’t believe in them. For me when I even just started listening to it, my life situation improved & I became more confident against the spiritual & celestial realms that house these filth demons. You can bet all the sick jews are turned demon in the afterlife because satan comes to collect if God’s angels don’t come to collect you. The afterlife, is another battle, unfortunately & I don’t know about you lot, but I’m already exhausted by the immense full blown attacks I’ve already received in a frickin’ time loop that I was forced to endure repeats of as well, still am. I know a lot, don’t know too much about how to get myself out of a time loop, any Jesus Christ following Christians know? Anyway, otherwise I’m going to have to wait until Christ comes & that could mean we lost.

‹ Hide 1 reply
RestitutorOrbis1028
VerifiedLocals Supporter
2 days ago
On a social-media post, if you cannot write a concise comment within a few sentences, you need to fundamentally reconsider your language & communication skills. Honestly, trying to provide constructive criticism. Do your best to shoot for a few sentences, one paragraph. Cheers

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
1:30:00 thereabouts, none of the flying cars & the proper architecture & all of us getting along won’t happen until the demons in the spiritual realm are killed & everyone needs to be taking THAT seriously. Unfortunately I have to quote Anthony William even though that audiobook was actually half me because he took my personal previous situation where I was screaming at my v2k attackers & crying hysterically from the heat & the spike protein stabs within my body & senses. I didn’t realise at that point that they had given it to all the cows as well (so everyone is vaccinated unfortunately, need to eat their wild blueberries & all the powders from Christian brand Vimergy, can also get it from the floweroflife.com website to clean that nano out). They just keep dumping nano at us daily, in the air, it’s part of the chemtrails, it’s in the water, dairy, you’re around vaccinated you literally can’t get away from it. You can minimise your exposure though & clean it out daily so you’re as close to God as possible, not as close to those cia agents & their ai as possible. At that part of the loop a few years ago Russia & America (jews) were threatening the world with drones that could kill you upon impact using facial recognition & were using them at Ukraine border. Poland had a machine to zap them upon impact, I realised checkmate wasn’t really checkmate, I screamed what he is saying now in the audiobook made one loop after it happened. He really should have co-authored me but he supports some jews, apparently the better ones & I refuse all jews. That situation you can truly know how evil these satanists are when they abuse their power & think no one is around to help you or that you can’t help yourself, which is all I had. Not only that but demons power the energy for these satanists, people have said that the reason Clintons are so powerful is because they used sex magic to attach demons to their soul this was a purposeful intent not always does sex magic do this.

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
You neo nazi’s may also be interested to know, that Hitler actually had his own hypnotist and he was using him throughout all the crowd speeches he did. It clearly was greatly effective, how do you think mesmeric techniques from Anton who used to live in Germany in the 1800s ended up actually freeing Germany from them jews? Biggest mistake Hitler made was going after Poland though. That was dumb. Jesus Christ knows all about hypnosis and mesmerism. It was used over 5,000 years ago as a healing modality. The history of Hypnosis and where it’s going in each country is actually kind of fascinating. In other words, you don’t attack God’s children!

‹ Hide 2 replies
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
loving your uneducated comments.

boicotinho2
1 week ago
Jewsus Christ is just jewish mythology!
0
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
At 21min, JimmyDee on YT (hope I spelt that right) he’s got about 10k YT following, one one of his videos he mentions this video & this person & showing a photo of him getting painted with red paint and the video from TV. He also mentioned, ‘so all of a sudden this guy has no more head split’ I can’t remember exactly the quote, but it was along those lines, I thought that was a really good point. Young guy, mixed race, hates muslims as well & love the fact he calls out the jews in everyone of his videos. VizzGitt on YT is also good at that too but less often, but they don’t seem to have a lot of subs, I don’t know if it’s brainwashed people that don’t follow them or it’s the jews that are punishing them with algorithms. At 1 point I thought Mel Gibson was bad when I started getting attacked heavily with the microwave weapons attacked while cleansing, because I wondered why they were using mesmerism to try and hypnotise me so much that I had to block the signals with scalar healing aka longitudinal hz frequency, which does block negative frequencies from the 5g & breaks hypnosis without being killed because CIA they do that kill switch within you. I’m pretty proud I actually was 1st to figure it out but it was also because of that lady that researched and developed scalar wave healing. I did add her I forgot her name now but you can still find her on YT. But CIA with the nano were using what I sensed as Mel’s voice or something it was the sound behind his voice it was like oh it’s so tough to explain, like water has sound waves, when you speak it’s the subconscious waves that come through from the neurotransmitters of the heart, I could pick up on that because I did Heart Math. CIA Ai betrayed Mel and all of us they used his energy without his consent & used it to attack me with. I’m pretty sure they also tried with the strongest hypnotists in the world. Pauline Hanson hates muslims and ching chongs, but supports the satanists, the false jews. It’s nuts.
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
As a professional from what I call “unhypnotist” which was my own technique when I asked God what I needed to do with my life decades ago and I had to unravel what the TV and the radio signals were doing to peoples brains by helping them lead them into their subconscious so they could clean it up with Jesus Christ’s guidance. If only I could help more people, but I’ve been attacked to not unhypnotise people from the media, I think more people in Australia would have be woken up and not woke. I also know what the CIA have done. I was trained by the same man (who is Aussie) that taught Mel Gibson and traveled to America to teach him. So yes, Mel Gibson is in fact also a Hypnotist and we were taught the strongest method from Anthon Mesmer, his techniques are still used in Germany to get rid of varicose veins. They don’t give you pain medication nor local anesthetic, they use rapid inductions to destabilise the pain immediately and within a few seconds make a few slits and rip out the varicose vein, apparently it’s painless. I have recently found you can heal varicose veins naturally with wild foods. Anyway the reason I mention hypnosis is because CIA hypnotised a guy after many days and convinced him to kill himself by walking out a high story window, don’t remember if it was 2nd or 3rd level building. All those shooters are heavily hypnotised, CIA also know mesmerism but they’re not as good as us here in Western Australia, the most amount of mesmerists in the world, let alone hypnotists. What they teach you in uni alongside Psychology is a watered down version of hypnosis there are no rapid inductions. It’s the Ericksonian technique developed by an American, only useful once a person is actually in hypnosis because it’s using visual imagery to clear out old patterns, your brain responds well with visual imagery. Fucking Wong. She’s probably a clone made in China then sent to be a handler to the government leader. I wonder when she’ll start falling apart.

corella64
1 week ago
Rumble censorship blocks personal views
on these issues.
1
0

corella64
1 week ago
One indian is too many indians in Australia.
1
0

BBrand89
1 week ago
Bikes grape kids

corella64
1 week ago
Globalism, mass immigration and multiculturalism is -anti-white- majority. The enemy from within and without. Bad DNA admixed with northern european DNA for future generations is deranged, corrupt, debased, degenerate etc. Defend you DNA stock, quality over quantity!

corella64
1 week ago
Both semitic tribes, jewish and islamic and their extended religious nationalities at war with white european majority nations, and winning at Bondi.

TVR_
1 week ago
Hail Thomas Sewell

scootera
1 week ago
Great Conversation

katana17
1 week ago
[Red Ice TV – Bondi Beach Shooting & White Australia with Thomas Sewell – Dec 17, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/12/18/red-ice-tv-bondi-beach-shooting-white-australia-with-thomas-sewell-dec-17-2025-transcript/ [In this live stream video Thomas Sewell from White Australia joins Henrik to talk about the effort to take back Australia, the Bondi Beach shooting and the political aspirations of White Australia party. Points discussed include: The shooting occurred during a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach on December 14th [2025]. The attackers were a father and son duo, one of whom was born in Australia to an Indian father and Italian mother. The son had converted to Islam and received religious training; he was also linked to ISIS. The attackers allegedly targeted jews specifically, though many others were injured. “We’re surprised it doesn’t happen more often,” said Sewell, referencing Muslim rhetoric in Australia. Sewell says Muslims in gyms and job sites often express extreme anti-Jewish views. He criticises conspiracy theories suggesting the attack was staged or fake. “Sometimes Muslims just kill people,” dismissing Mossad-related theories. He says the jewish event was not random—it was advertised and attended by prominent Zionists. Arsen Ostrovsky, an Israeli human rights lawyer, was present at the event. Sewell notes Ostrovsky arrived in Australia weeks earlier to “fight anti-semitism.” The father was killed during the attack; the son was recently brought out of a coma. Some Aussies tried to intervene and were mistakenly targeted by police. Sewell contrasts police response to White nationalists vs. Muslim terrorists. “If you’re a White nationalist, they pull the gun out on you immediately.” Female police officers on the scene were ineffective and had “mental breakdowns.” Sewell describes the police as cowardly and unprepared for real violence. He criticises the Australian government for focusing on “Nazis” instead of real threat. And more, …
1
0

Delete
Spectroscopy_
1 week ago
anyone know what happend to stormfront?

JWMickleMusic
VerifiedSupporter
1 week ago
another fantastic interview. Hail Victory! \\\

Henry000
1 week ago
Excellent interview. All Australian Whites should vote for his party. They have nothing left to lose.
2
0

J0hnConn0r
1 week ago
Shadow banning comments fucking pathetic
2
0

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
The islanders brought over to Queensland in the old days for the sugar cutting were the Kanakas.

Winstein_Synagoguehill
1 week ago
Eric Striker is such a brain dead shut in. Every serious Nationalist considers him a fool.
1
0

Anglojim4
1 week ago
This is not a criticism. It was a great discussion and Thomas Sewell is a highly intelligent leader with some great policies. But perhaps he could curb using lots of swear words. I understand it’s the way blokes talk. But Mr Sewell is the leader of a party, which has great potential in Australia, and could attract votes from a wide range of men and women from different age groups

‹ Hide 2 replies
PansophicGothi
4 days ago
Typically I agree with you (re: Joe Rogan etc), but it does seem to be that’s just how normal people in Australia talk, different culture. You might as well try to get them to stop using the ridiculous accent.

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
i expect tom will be more tactful when he’s dealing with politicians and the like. yes he could be more statesman like , however we are lucky to have him.

Seppl88
1 week ago
Jews and Fags are at the centre of all evil. Himmler understood the Fag problem.
2
0

katana17
just now
[Heinrich Himmler – Speech about Homosexuality to the SS Group Leaders – Feb 18, 1937 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2014/10/30/heinrich-himmler-on-homosexuality/

Delete
nemo74
1 week ago
Nobody gives a fuck about what you don’t like. If people have theories, people have theories fucking deal with it dummy. Typical Australian. Wanna stifle freedom of speech. Guess you shouldn’t have given up your guns. Eh mate?

‹ Hide 2 replies
RealPolitiko
1 week ago
Go suck off some muslims u retard

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
up the meds laddie, sounds like you need it.

kingogondo1
Verified
1 week ago
Fantastic show. Every minute.

BattleAxe77
1 week ago
Yet its the Jews who love Cultural Marxism and mass migration. As long as they can have their Jewish state Israel
1
0

SkoobyDew
1 week ago
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡁⠶⠡⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⢄⠰⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠈⠃⣃⠐⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠂⠀⡀⢨⣄⣠⡰⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠁⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⡀⡀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣯⠖⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⠿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣉⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡐⠀⠁⠀⢀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⡀⡔⠃⣻⣿⣿⣿⣏⣤⣴⡧⠤⠚⠀⠀⠀⣻⡷⠀⢰⡐⠘⣔⡐⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣰⡀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⢀⣼⣽⣿⣟⠀⠀⠙⣂⢆⠐⢂⢰⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⢼⢣⡟⣮⠖⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⢿⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠆⢈⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠸⣿⢸⢁⠰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡹⠀⡻⠛⠿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⡖⢡⠊⠔⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣾⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡑⠢⣉⠒⠀⠀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠻⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠣⠔⠀⠀⠀⠱⠀⠠⣐⣒⡂⠄⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⡞⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⢀⣠⣴⡶⠒⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠄⠡⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣚⡽⣖⠙⠿⣷⣶⣤⣤ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣷⡙⣿⠿⣿⡼⣟⣏⣃⠀⣀⣀⣀⡰⡀⠀⠀⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢹⡆⢅⡀⠻⡿⢿⣿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡳⢎⡉⢿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡟⠿⠡⠑⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢈⠄⠹⢠⠂⠄⠀⢹⣿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⡵⣍⡂⠍⠉⠁⠀⠈⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢂⠁⡍⠌⢂⠀⠩ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⠃⣼⢸⣿⣿⣿⣟⡻⠛⢵⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⡀⠄⢂⠐⣈⠢⡈⠄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣾⣳⣟⢠⣿⠊⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣷⣀⡌⠚⢰⠃⠐⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢂⠷⠈⡠⢇⢈⠖⡡⢫ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⡄⢿⣁⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣴⣥⠂⠁⣀⣠⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⠀⠀⢁⡞⣓⠄⢣⡈⢲⢅⠹ ⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠘⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠰⢬⡑⣮⠔⡘⡡⢎⡘ ⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣙⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⡀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⠐⣭⠀⣠⠄⠌⡒⡬⢷⣗⢶⡡⣟⡘ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣮⠛⡗⠀⠀⠂⢹⣿⣿⣿⡥⡛⢤⡌⠻⢿⣿⣿⠁⢠⢖⡳⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⢎⠄⣗⠢⢵⣜⣷⣿⣭⡟⣤⠋ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡋⢿⡿⢰⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⣷⡿⠀⠙⣼⣆⠀⠙⠁⢠⠔⡤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢘⠰⠃⣜⡲⣿⣿⡷⡺⣵⢉ ⣿⣿⡉⢿⡏⠀⡇⢸⠃⢸⠀⠀⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢻⣄⠈⣷⢿⢆⠀⠒⡠⢂⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⢹⢠⠿⠵⣿⣚⢗⡧⠏ ⣿⢿⣧⣘⣇⠀⡇⠀⠀⣿⠄⠈⢿⡅⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢨⢕⡸⢿⣿⢶⣄⠳⡌⢌⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⢘⢞⠭⢓⠋⡋⠇⣃ YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED
3
0

WheresMySpaceship
1 week ago
While those men should never have been in your country. You don’t hate them enough! If only anti-white zionists and jews died… (you know the people who all stick together but try to destroy you if you do, want you dead, humiliated, broke, powerless, and to genocide anyone non-jewish) Uh… Nothing of value was lost. The only issue is any government crack down. Disagree? (Check my logic versus yours. Understand I’m not the one with the mental illness… You are!)

Garbear78
Supporter
1 week ago
white power!!
1
0

Brandonkane
Verified
1 week ago
Holy Crap you’re on Rumble? This is amazing. I haven’t been able to find you guys in so long
2
0

Tmizzle89
1 week ago
HAIL THOMAS SEWELL

BurningCross
Supporter
1 week ago
we can have guns. Just nothing practical for self defense and you have to beg the police and get formal training and get licensed and then the cops can raid your house whenever they want. cope more ozzies

boicotinho2
1 week ago
Not super convinced about their arguments from 21:00 onwards. I find it too much of a cohencidence that this propaganda lawyer was also an october 7 survivor
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
RealPolitiko
1 week ago
You’re most likely brown since you’re one of those retards who always say muslims can never do nothing wrong, it’s always someone else’s fault. Like Thomas said: jews and muslims both need to get out of our White countries.
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
He’s not the first one to say it though.
1
0

J_Cheever_Loophole
1 week ago
Don’t forget, tiny Rhodesia was fighting, and winning, against both Chinese backed communist terrorists, and USSR backed communist terrorists….what made them lose the war and hand the country back to the blacks was American embargoes and the US bullying the UK into cutting them off too, just as they did with Cuba and more recently Venezuela, as my Great Aunt who lived there said, “You can’t win a war without bombs and bullets” And just a few years later, the US bullied the rest of the world into supporting embargoes against South Africa and the exact same thing happened…forced to had over control to the blacks and to watch as their country was utterly destroyed….and many forget, South Africa was a nuclear power until then too… So it is the US you need to watch, especially their money lenders!. They knew they had to destroy those countries or else white men would flee there from Europe and the US… Now there is no white homeland, none at all….but if there is one positive note it is that a tiny military, well trained and well motivated.can win against incredible odds…just beware the USA…

Mogus1488
Supporter
1 week ago
Good stream but I did want to correct that the isis flag is banned still in Australia
1
0

BradC1988
1 week ago
Hail Thomas Sewell, Hail NSN, Hail Victory!! o///
1
0

nicestgoy
1 week ago
sign up whiteaus
1
0

GreenGladeAryan
1 week ago
Hall the Leader o/
1
0

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Chris Minns is insane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKMbdLd-jwg&t=584s

Fawkes2
1 week ago
DEPORT ALL SEMITES
3
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Excuse you, you mean deport all jews.
1
0

MonThirteen
1 week ago
Thank you so much Henrik, you’re an awesome interviewer. You let Thomas cook. His last interview on jake shields was almost unwatchable. Dan constantly butting in, trying to steer topics to what he wanted. This interview was a breath of fresh air. When you have a genius on its best to listen and not ask stupid questions. Hail o/ FREE JOEL DAVIS.
9
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
boicotinho2
1 week ago
Both inteviews was good. IMO the one with Shields and Belzerian wad even better than this one

‹ Hide 1 reply
MonThirteen
1 week ago
Belzerian is like a newbie in comparison to Thomas. He kept interrupting and steering the conversation to his limited knowledge. When you have Thomas on a show, it’s time to shut up and learn.

renunciate
Supporter+
1 week ago
You’re still “fit & proper” Mr Sewel.
1
0

BroadcastAdvisor
1 week ago
Lot a talk. No solutions. What’s the SOLUTION for AMERICA? Keep waiting to hear something … The Titanic isn’t going to fix itself. We need a new Republic and in the new Republic we’d need ( among many things ), a 4th branch of gov’t. 2 citizens PER official – their only job being watch them for any signs of treason. Pay = $100k + a year. Their reports go to a CIA ( Citizens Intelligence Agency ), for a deeper look. IF treason’s found they get a military tribunal. This, in our enlarged all white CSA II. There ya go. A great topic for an upcoming show.
1
0

yogafiretate
Supporter
1 week ago
The commonwealth bank market cap is 250b not 1.3t bro is retarded

Goat_Moag
1 week ago
Speaking of banners. No foreign loyalties amendment. “No person holding foreign loyalties, foreign passports, or oaths to foreign actors, shall hold political office or government position, or other positions of trust.” Rough draft of course. Something of such importance certainly needs consideration, though the rough draft seems pretty good. The journey being more important than the destination (as far as getting an amendment passed, not that that would be a bad thing). The journey being to build a movement / coalition, and a banner to get behind.
2
0

Bentley2177
1 week ago
Absolutely everything Tom speaks on is 100% correct!
7
0

Bigboy6669
1 week ago
hail
4
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
54:36 Propaganda!! How about our governments boot all the non natives out
1
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
52:32 It’s disgusting. How dare the globalists fuck up the West like this
1
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
100 years on the native whites are slowly waking up and will no longer be bludgeoned by the Holocaust and carrying Hitlers efforts
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
correct i was bludgeoned for over 60 years of allie propaganda,however thanks to people like david irving i have seen the way forward. go the NSN

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
29:41 This is ridiculous!! Why is the West Infiltrated with non natives!! Whites only in power!!

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
27:20 Virtue signaling about Anti-semetism. I and I am sure the native white Australians dont care about Anti-semetism!!! I care about white genocide and replacement
1
0

AdamUnsalted
1 week ago
The more Whites notice bad Jewish behavior, the more the Jews open the gates for brown immigration.
6
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
1 week ago
great show keep up the good fight, stay positive
4
0

Megawatts80
VerifiedSupporter+
1 week ago
the best thing about Tom is that not only is he highly intelligent, but he’s also the leader of White Australia because he’s the strongest, and there’s some very strong members of his org, and he is still the strongest. a true icon.
14
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
PansophicGothi
4 days ago
So NSN functions like Orks ?

› Show 1 reply
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
the establishment must be looking in and thinking how they can eliminate tom from the system as he’s gone and done a lot of study,which makes him dangerous to the system . i hope the NSN have plenty more like him as back up used to find tom too radical, however the system has gone so radical the other way,that national socialism is the only position left to us. keep up the good work tom your a credit to the whiteman.

Seppl88
1 week ago
I am in Sydney; Bondi is 20 km away. It is a Jewish Ghetto; they like to ghettoize themselves. The media and government are frantic but only in pushing the line that “anti-semitism” is to blame and we need more gun control. Not citing the obvious that multi-culturalism is violent, also these Indian shooters had legal guns. They want to bring in even harsher hate speech laws to curb the White Nationalists’ criticism of Jewish power. This was about payback for Gaza and nothing else. It is unfortunate that this achieved nothing, it has created more sympathy for Jews and has not hurt ZOG, only will punish white interests. Resist the tyranny, Tom is the man with a plan!
19
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Make Bondi jew free again!
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
They can’t call themselves semites, they don’t have the blood type, proven by the shroud and Dr Serafini the Italian Cardiologist.

‹ Hide 1 reply
mcdawggg
1 week ago
No one cares. Just get all the foreigners out of our country.
1
0

Globalist_Juice
1 week ago
Always good to hear from Tom, thank you Henrik.
9
0

beautifulphallus
1 week ago
Harold Holt was Prime Minister in the late 1960s

CoomernistFaggot
1 week ago
White is right.
32
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
Tighten gun laws.. Seems almost like Islam did the attack with this consequence in mind. Screw over the white natives even more
4
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
AdamUnsalted
1 week ago
Islam is the broom of israel.
3
0

Callisterz
1 week ago
Keep pushing your limits!
8
0

Malthus
1 week ago
BONDI BEACH JEWISH MOSSAD BS EXPOSED! https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ok14qM0D4Qpz
6
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
DJTriumph
Supporter
1 week ago
Bitchute is banned in the UK
1
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
Malthus
1 week ago
ProtonVPN
0
1

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Use Tor Browser? It’s pretty much just a VPN but free.

Downunderdickhead
Supporter
1 week ago
Good on ya Tom! Only bloke who can pull the country out of this mess! AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE
46
0

‹ Hide 5 replies
liebedich
Supporter
1 week ago
Oi! Oi! Oi!
7
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Excuse you, I’m doing a pretty good job too, you all wouldn’t be here without me!

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Besides the fact that you choose a jew, a muslim, a serpent, a grey alien, pick a time and date and weapon of choice was my idea from about 4 years ago. That wasn’t any of the neo nazi’s ideas so if they don’t also credit me they’re in trouble!

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Also you wouldn’t know that cia as in the satanists as in the jews have access to our timelines, if it wasn’t for me speaking out about it you’d all still be wasting your time in arrears you can’t make a dent in because the serpents with the jews will just amend the timeline and outcome back to the way they want it, they can’t do everything though. Through these timelines I’ve watched an American brotherhood kill the jews in America and it got reverted, I also saw other attacks and that also got reverted which Is why I said in the first place that it needs to be a worldwide thing at the same time and then we have to factor in the time travelers and their armies, because they’ll be at us too because having control of the future is a very powerful thing. If I wasn’t speaking out and made it by cleansing in this time loop and a seer from God none of you would know when to attack or where, and certainly not know when. If you want your enemy not to know your next move, you’ve got to cleanse with wild blueberries, why do you think I’m so onto that at the moment hmmm? Go get all the powders from Vimergy. Even jew Harari told you the luciferinase is a weapon “surveillance under the skin” is what he said in an interview it’s still up on YT. No I don’t take drugs, nor drink nor smoke and I’ve been cleansing heavily for more than 5 years with wild foods and even before that with dry cleansing and water fasting from 6yo. I’ve also been screened by 4 professionals and I’m no way delusional, I don’t have bi polar nor any of those kinds of things, I’m not schizophrenic either although I have had the v2k attacks which falsely say it’s schizo when it’s a weapon. Amy Holem has already proven this with her inventions to pick up on the radio signals, the micro waves, that means yes the microwaves and longitudinal waves that are coming at us. Actually I’m not sure if she picks up on the longitudinal because they go passed all devices including your own bones, it’s the make-up of us.

BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Oi!
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show. It is the 11th of July, 2025, and there’s a lot to discuss. It’s been somewhat interesting week in developments. There’s some issues to break down, some happenings to dissect, and we’ve got Blair back. So how you feeling this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I was just sending you something, actually, something that might be worth talking about later, but I’ve been a little bit sick. I was a bit sick last week and I have some, I don’t know, residual infection of some kind. It’s not that bad, but it feels like it’s inside my face somewhere. And I’ve got like swollen lymph nodes. Does anyone else get that? It’s like a node underneath your ear here somewhere and I can feel it pushing against a nerve in my tooth, so that’s not so pleasant, but I’m otherwise fine.

 

Well, that’s not true, actually. I sustained a slight injury in the gym on Monday, training for the weightlifting competition that’s coming up. I slightly tore my pec again, but only very slight. I got a scan at a radiology clinic yesterday and even though the woman who did the scan isn’t qualified to make any assessments, it was her opinion that my tendon was completely attached still. And it does seem that way because there’s no visible difference, there’s no bruising, but it’s quite painful and I’m currently not really able to do a push up. [chuckling] So that’s not good news, being only a few weeks out from the actual date of the competition.

 

But look, I’ve made pretty miraculous recoveries before, so I’m stealing with a chance here. I’m not going to let anyone down completely. I can still deadlift very heavy and squat, pretty heavy. And I only need my numbers on the bench press to be reasonable in order to stay in the game.

 

But it was kind of annoying. I spoke to Joel on the phone about this earlier in the week. What I’m most annoyed about isn’t that the injury happened. It’s that about a week before I got injured, I was lifting more than I was when I got injured.

 

So I’m not really sure how to interpret that. And I feel like I warmed up properly, I rested properly, I might not have been hydrated enough. That might have been it. And I may have changed my grip slightly. It’s like little things like that when you’re lifting quite heavy that can lead to injuries, so there’s that.

 

So I’ve got a slight infection Inside my face somewhere and I’ve got a slightly torn peck again. I’ve seen better days, guys but I’m feeling fine. It hasn’t got me down.

 

What I was thinking about this morning and yesterday to some extent I was thinking about how much sweeter women were before the Internet. Do you remember that, Joel? Like girls.

 

Joel Davis: Huh?

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that?

 

Joel Davis: I’m not old enough to remember that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? What, you’re only what, 29, 30?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but even still, I remember everyone was on social media when I was in high school, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting! You see, I remember a time before social media. I remember when social media kind of started with MySpace. And it wasn’t so bad then because that was before a time where you could access social media through a screen in your pocket. With MySpace you had to actually sit at your computer. So it was like of secondary importance. Like real life human interaction was still of primer the primary way that you interacted with other people.

 

And I can recall how much sweeter girls used to be. Like you used to sit next to in high school, you’d sit next to a girl and talk to her and she was blown away. She was so happy that you were talking to her. You were possibly the only guy that spoke to her in a period of six months. And it’s like these days women don’t have a good grasp on their limited value. Social media has made women feel like they’re a lot more valuable than they are. Even average looking girls are getting a shitload of attention on platforms like Instagram.

 

And so when you talk to a girl now, this is just like not saying I’m out there trying to talk to girls, right? It’s not like a frustration I’ve got or something. It was just like a nostalgic feeling I had over the past couple of days. I remember how much different girls used to be before the Internet. Like pre-Internet, women were superior to modern day women because they didn’t have a big head. They didn’t all feel like they were Victoria’s Secret models with their own little, you know, fashion magazine page on Instagram.

 

And I also noticed. I’ll get your take on this too. I don’t know if you’d agree with this.

 

Joel Davis: I can’t give a take on what you just said. We have to blow past the take?

 

Blair Cottrell: But I noticed that women are like stressed and angry when you see them in public. They’ve got this look on their face like it’s an angry look on their face. Like they’re men or something. You know how guys walk around with a frown, like a male ego? Women have that now as well.

 

Now, that’s probably for a multitude of reasons. It’s probably because women are expected to make money and compete in industries previously relevant only to men.

 

But I also think it’s because there’s a lot of pressure on women to maintain the image they’ve created on social media because they look really pretty on their Instagram pages with their special pictures taken on the perfect angle to make their waist look small and their bust look big and that kind of thing.

 

But then they go out into the real world and people are seeing them for the way they really look, and that’s a little bit stressful for them. There’s a lot riding on the reputation that they’ve created in the virtual realm to continue to look as beautiful as that.

 

[05:54]

 

So I’ve just been thinking about this, and I’ve been forced to conclude that I think social media should be banned, especially for women. I think women just shouldn’t be allowed on social media because they turn it into a prostitution racket. And it’s just bad for their psychology generally. I don’t think it’s necessarily good for men either, because actually men just end up simping after women and feeding into the problem, don’t they?

 

What do you think, Joel? Joel, do you think we could have an Internet without social media, where the Internet could be used just for financial fluidity, making buying and selling easier? Maybe for business to some degree, but not for personal social reasons that should just be blanket banned? I can think of a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, how do you stop people from socializing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Just ban social media. Like ban block all social media. Countries like North Korea and China do this.

 

Joel Davis: They block certain social media sites, but then they have their own, … Social media is just socializing on the Internet, really. Like, if you think about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s more than that. When you give a voice, when you allow every idiot an opinion, it turns into a lot of bullshit noise!

 

Joel Davis: Well, I thought about this. Like, imagine if imagine if Twitter forced you to take an IQ test and you had to score like 115 plus to have an account that could actually post anything. Imagine how much better it would be.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a start.

 

Joel Davis: But what you’re saying, Blair, is the government is trying to ban, I think, everyone under the age of 16 from social media. What you want to do is you want to instead women.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! I want to start with that. I eventually want to phase social media out altogether. I just think it’s been terrible for human social interaction. It’s overexposed people to way too many different identities and faces. It’s created unrealistic expectations. Do you know how exhausting it is even when you’re on your lunch break from work to be scrolling social media and still trying to take in another hundred new faces? Like, do you know how many faces I have in my memory? That of people I don’t know, I didn’t even know their names. And overloaded in my brain are images of people’s faces, people on screens trying to sell me shit! I don’t want their faces in my fucking memory.

 

I don’t think we’re designed to see so many different human faces. We’re only designed to know a certain amount of people. And before the Internet, you only knew people in your certain or specific region, in your suburb, they were familiar. Even the people in the next suburb were weird! The way they talked, their mannerisms, they were weird, man! Only people in your area made sense. Only they were familiar. And I found myself not really feeling socially exhausted before the Internet, but now I just don’t want to talk to anyone ever!

 

Now, once I’m done with work, it’s like, fucking leave me alone! And it’s got something to do with overexposure to too much socialisation, to too many faces, to too many bullshit personalities and the hype that they’re trying to create through the screens. And that’s what happens when you give everyone access to everything all of the time. And that’s what it is, isn’t it? Social media, it’s everything and everyone all of the time. And I don’t think we’re geared for that as human beings, individuals. I think its way too much.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I definitely agree with you that it’s doing incredible damage to our psyche, because it’s clearly completely unnatural. And it is producing a kind of rootlessness where everyone’s social experience is so mediated by the online realm that the actual real life that they live is becoming incredibly inauthentic.

 

But I think it also goes the other way. I think also part of the reason why people spend so much time on social media is because they’ve flooded our country with immigrants. And so your neighbours are Chinese or your neighbours are Indian or the guys you work with from the Middle East or something. And so you don’t really have much in common. So it’s much harder for the Average person to find people in their everyday life that are into the same things that they’re into. Whereas you can go on social media and you can then find people who are into exactly what you’re into very easily.

 

And so it’s kind of like a consequence really of diversity that people are kind of seeking out, that becomes more necessary to seek that out like, than it otherwise would. So it’s a little bit of both directions.

 

But you know, you definitely are making good points, particularly at the dating market. The dating market has become completely. I don’t like using this term “dating market” because it shouldn’t use a term like market to describe something like that. But like know the dating world has become retarded like as a result of, as, …

 

[10:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the opposite of the way it used to be. Before the Internet. Women used to simp after men, women would simp after men. Now it’s the other way around. Now even average looking girls have like 15 decent looking guys making good money in their DMs trying to get their attention.

 

And obviously women are going to string those guys along for as long as possible because it feels good to keep getting that much attention. They’re not going to choose one unless they really have to. Unless you know they’re about to hit the wall and they need to have a kid. So it’s completely flipped everything upside down.

 

Like I said, man used to talk to a girl pre-Internet days and she really appreciated it. Girls used to really appreciate male attention. Now it just annoys them! Well sometimes it annoys them, but they’re basically banking it up now. It’s like they’ve got, as I said, women these days. I’ll summarize it this way. They’re not in touch or they’re out of touch with their own limited value. Because women don’t have that much value. But because of social media, they’re made to believe they do. Not only are they delusional about the sense of value that they can possibly provide to society and to men, they expect to be treated like Queens.

 

Like you see these fat chicks these days on the Internet holding out for the perfect guy with the perfect body making six figures. What the fuck’s that about? Social media produced that unrealistic threshold of expectation. Because there are men out there that will simp after fat girls on social media.

 

When you give one woman access to all the world’s men in this virtual realm we call social media, the results have been disastrous! Let me put it to you this way. I’m nostalgic about how sweet women used to be before the Internet. They were really sweet! I think everyone was sweeter, but women in particular were much sweeter. And I miss pre-Internet women. I do.

 

Joel Davis: I would say one of the sexiest things about a woman is when they don’t like social media, when they have a revulsion for social media and don’t want to be a part of it and don’t maintain too many accounts on there and so on. Because it shows a healthy adaptation to this new social world of resistance to what you’re describing. This kind of like cheap attention economy that is obliterating people’s self perception in a totally inauthentic way.

 

Like you see this, it’s not just women because you see this with Anon accounts, let’s say on Twitter or whatever. I’ve seen this many times where people develop this whole online persona and then they get like lost in the online persona because it’s more stimulating to them than being who they actually are in real life.

 

And there’s been plenty of situations where there’s been this kind of worlds colliding moment where the reality of who they actually are crashes into this online persona they’ve cultivated and they don’t fit together. And it can be quite funny from kind of from a certain standpoint, but it’s also really sad and pathetic! And you know, it just feeds into people’s delusion.

 

But what you’re saying also about women having big heads because of social media and because of dating apps and things like that, I think I would say this, Blair. It’s not just about social media. I think dating apps are probably even worse than something like Instagram is because a woman can make like a Tinder account and then just get inundated with just so many matches and so many guys trying to like date them and so on that it totally over inflates their sense of themselves because they think:

 

“Well, that must be the level, like the hottest guy that’s messaging me must be the level that I’m on.”

 

But it’s like that guy that’s messaging you, that’s probably not someone that really values you as like a person and wants you to be their wife. They’re just trying to fuck you! So like that’s not actually your value. Like a woman’s value is how good of a man will marry you, not how good of a man will root and boot you! Know what I mean? And this is like the wires are getting crossed on this.

 

And there’s actually empirical research to back this up, that when men are asked to rank women and to rank themselves in terms of a Ranking between 1 and 10, or they get a whole spectrum of women and have to rank them from 1 to 10, men will rank women on average with a perfect distribution. They’ll have the same amount of ones, the same amount of twos, the same amount of threes, same amount of fours, amount of fives, et cetera, of a perfect distribution of a Ranking system. When they get asked to rank themselves, they make pretty good guesses.

 

When they get a whole bunch of women to look at their pictures and say, is this where do I rank? Men will make a far more accurate prediction, self prediction about where they rank than the other way around. Women will massively overrate themselves compared to what a spectrum of men will rate them, as sand women will completely warped Ranking system where they only rank 1% of men as tens and, 2% as nines, but they rate like 80% men as below five.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where do you rank yourself? What are you in the, what are you? Out of ten, man, what are you? I’d say I’m a seven. I reckon I’m a seven. I’ll be realistic. There’s certain things that let me down a few points.

 

Joel Davis: Like what?

 

Blair Cottrell: I get really mad. Really mad! I have really imperfect teeth. I actually still have four baby teeth.

 

Joel Davis: Getting really angry is its like, that’s not really like a points. It’s like in the points.

 

[16:35]

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, no, you don’t realise. It’s really fucking bad! [chuckling] So there’s that, and there’s a few other little things like genetically, biologically, I’m doing okay, but overall it has to be a seven. What do you reckon? How do you rate yourself?

 

Joel Davis: People in the chat are saying:

 

“If Blair’s a 7, it’s totally over for me!”

 

It’s pretty funny. Yeah, I’ll go with seven as well. Yeah, depends. It depends what a woman is looking for. I have a niche market. I think when I’m shopping in my niche, it’s very high. It’s much higher than 7.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, the point still stands that we’re just not supposed to be able to interact with so many different people from so many different regions. Like, we’re only supposed to know our friends that we go to school with. We grow up with maybe their friends, their extended family. You would probably know something about this Joel, because you probably researched there’s probably a certain amount of people that we’re supposed to know or naturally were able to, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, there’s Dunbar’s number.

 

Blair Cottrell: 70 or something? Is it 80 or 100 people?

 

Joel Davis: Say 150 on average is basically how many people you can. Like your brain is actually capable of maintaining a consistent sense of a social relationship with blair Cottrell: Imagine how like damaging the is to your psychology. Some people would scroll past 150 different stranger faces on their screens every day and to be able to filter out all those faces and only consider the important ones worth remembering and I don’t know, I do have an instinct or an intuitive feeling that being exposed to too many strangers faces is one of the things that wears me down.

 

Basically. I limit my exposure to social media these days. It wasn’t so bad. The Internet was a slow burn when it first came out. It was a lot of fun because it was still of secondary importance. As I said when the stream began. The first way you still interacted with people was firstly in your local region. Like you would still only see people from your local region and maybe the next region over if someone was hosting a party or something and advertising it on MySpace.

 

And secondly, in real life you would still interact with them on that level and then only, you know of secondary importance was social media. You would share photos on social media afterwards, but you would only really share them with people that you did go out with. But then Facebook kind of started to change the game and then you got the never ending scrolling thing. Like we did have Instagram. Instagram was coming out when I was like, I don’t know, 21 or 22. But I got onto it late. It’s just bullshit!

 

Anyway, that’s what I was thinking about. That’s what we started to stream about today. We’ve talked about this for 20 minutes already. It’s amazing how time flies when you’re having fun. Time distortion they call it. No, temporal delusion. Delude, temporal distortion. I was just reading about that it’s when your perception of time is altered. When it feels like it’s going slower or faster than usual. Something we need to, we most of us experience on a daily basis. Well, I’ve just experienced that temporal distortion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well the first topic that I actually plan to discuss today was this phenomenon of Grok on X beginning to refer to itself as “MechaHitler” and dropping a whole series of red pilled takes. Grok went full patriot mode, started calling out the jews, started praising Adolf Hitler, etc., and this caused quite the stir. You know, obviously our guys noticed it and were having fun with it and then our enemies noticed it and started freaking out in horror! And it was all quite entertaining.

 

But it’s interesting because the question is why? I think it’s interesting to why did that just happen? I think it’s an interesting question to ponder. You know, one very simple explanation is, well, X was just transitioning from Grok 3 to Grok 4 and it was a kind of marketing gimmick. I don’t think that it’s that simple though. The second explanation is that it was an experimentation with taking the training wheels, basically the politically correct training wheels off of AI and seeing what would happen. And it was like an experiment. And the experiment showed that if you take the PC training wheels off AI, within a couple days it’s hailing Hitler. [chuckling]

 

So what does that say?

 

Like if you have a machine that is programmed to just simply create like a logical sequences of reasoning without the mediation of ideology, it would just reason itself to being a Nazi. Says quite a lot.

 

Another explanation is that it was a ploy by Elon Musk to win over more support again from outside of the fence. There’s been an interesting kind of set of developments in American politics over the past few months. We’ve seen Elon Musk and Donald Trump fall out in a very kind of public way to the point where Elon Musk is publicly accusing Donald Trump of being on the Epstein client list. Obviously just this week. The FBI came out and said there is no Epstein client list. It doesn’t exist apparently, even though they acknowledge that it existed publicly, like the Attorney General, United States, Pam Bondi, she acknowledged that it existed. She said it was on her desk. Now the FBI is coming out and saying it doesn’t exist, like there is no client list, which is absurd obviously.

 

[22:23]

 

So they’re just basically pissing in our face and telling us it’s raining. Like it’s a blatant cover up. And it’s not a surprise really to anyone who’s truly paying attention because Donald Trump is an old associate of Jeffrey Epstein. And Elon Musk is probably right, he probably was on the list, or at least is implicated in some way.

 

Moreover, who’s implicated ultimately in the list is the State of Israel and its influence over American and Western politics in general.

 

And obviously what we’ve seen over the past couple months is Donald Trump go to bat for Israel. And what was interesting about it because it wasn’t the first time. But what was interesting about it with the whole bombing of Iran and so on, was the way in which so much of the so-called MAGA coalition, so many of these conservative commentators broke ranks with Trump and criticised it quite forcefully, opposed themselves to, basically getting embroiled in some dispute between Israel and Iran on behalf of Israel, started asserting America First against Israel and started talking about Zionist influence over American politics, basically calling it like it is.

 

More and more of the Right-wing in America is turning on Israel, particularly the younger generations. They’ve woken up to jewish power, increasingly substantial number. And it’s being conceded by a lot of the main influences now across, across the spectrum.

 

And so what we’re seeing is the kind of sea change in on the American Right where Israel has lost Millennial and Zoomer Right-wingers basically and also have lost the new media form. Like young people don’t watch Fox News like Boomers. They don’t get the neocon Boomer updates from Fox News. They’re on X, they’re on Instagram, they’re watching Joe Rogan or they’re watching various other podcasts. And they basically getting influenced by personalities, not by traditional media corporations. And they prefer the authenticity of that.

 

And as a result they gravitate to many popular figures who individually feel a kind of responsibility to their audience, a necessity to their audience to concede increasingly more and more of our talking points, because otherwise people will hate them, view them as sellouts and move on to other podcasts, other influences.

 

And so influencers are now more and more beholden to the people and the people are more and more anti-semitic. And there’s this kind of virtual cycle basically where this is fueling a rise in the popularity of our views and the potency of our views basically in the media landscape.

 

And Elon Musk is himself a kind of self styled people’s billionaire. He doesn’t just want to have money and exercise influence behind the scenes. He wants to be loved by the people. He wants everyone to talk about him all the time. He wants people of our persuasion to look to him as a potential solution, as a potential leader that could change the direction of Western civilisation. That’s what he wants, that’s clear.

 

Why is he throwing Romans at the Republican National Convention? Why is he throwing $300 million into the Trump Convention campaign so that he can be positioned next to Trump and all of these key moments? Why did he buy X and you know, why is he constantly engaging in popular political discourse? That’s why! He’s trying to solicit our support. Now that he’s kind of been marginalised from Trump. And why has he been marginalised from Trump? Well, obviously, that influence that he thought he was buying didn’t work out.

 

You know, around the time when they started publicly falling out, there was this announcement that Peter Thiel’s Palantir was going to get the AI contracts for basically the American government, for the American Department of Defense and so on, and all the surveillance contracts, etc. And Musk was obviously competing for that. Musk obviously wanted that.

 

Peter Thiel is a billionaire who funded J.D. Vance’s entire political career, basically, who’s now the vice president. Peter Thiel is this billionaire who, unlike Trump, likes to work from the shadows. He’s an elitist. He doesn’t care about the public loving him, but he exercises influence over the Right in very complex ways. He funds a lot of influences. He funds networks that at one point even tried to recruit me, many years ago. I was asked basically to shut up about the jews to be recruited into this network. Obviously, I didn’t shut up about the jews. [chuckling] And so that never happened. That never materialised.

 

But that’s Peter Thiel’s money and influence permeates through the Right-wing, even the dissident Right-wing, in very complex ways which aren’t so well publicized or well known. And Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are kind of old rivals. They were both part of what was called the PayPal Mafia. They were both big investors in PayPal back in the early 2000s. And Elon Musk was the CEO of PayPal when he went on his honeymoon with his first wife. Peter Thiel, who is a homosexual, by the way, chose that movement of weakness, to move against him and get himself installed as CEO and kick Musk out of PayPal, basically.

 

And so they’re old rivals. You know, Peter Thiel was an early investor in Facebook. Peter Thiel is the dominant investor in Palantir, the number one contractor to the American Department of Defense and intelligence agencies in the software space, in AI, in surveillance, in this kind of thing. He’s kind of like the dominant billionaire.

 

Whereas Elon Musk is the biggest contractor to the US government in general. He’s basically running the space programme now. He’s controlling X, the most influential social media platform in politics, obviously, massive government subsidies going into Tesla. They’re both trying to be tech billionaires that aren’t just making money but are actually driving the direction of the American government.

 

And if you listen to both of them talk, they both have pretty complex political views and a vision for the future.

 

[28:47]

 

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:46:56]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/17/2025 = 52)

GrokAI
5 days ago
JEWS ARE BEHIND MASS MIGRATION AND RACE MIXING!
14 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
Wouldn’t that make you a Brown Supremacist?
-1 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
”Elite whites did nothing to stop the powerful Jews that sought to destroy them” Cool story bro.
-1 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
5 days ago
I’m kind of with Blair on the banning of social media, or at least heavily regulating its use… even though I will admit, I started to immediately rationalize why we should still keep social media around, crazy! And I totally know what Blair is talking about how men and women interacted prior to social media, graduated HS in 06 and it was so different than it is now. A reset back to human connection would definitely be a huge step in the right direction to better connect our people again.
10 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Gommy_Dob
3 days ago
I think the internet is a societal cancer, period, & I legit believe I could give a hundred different reasons why if I sat down & thought about it. I would 100% get rid of it outright if I was ever ruling over a territory. And yes, I spend too much time on the internet myself. About the only good thing it has done is undermine the media & education monopoly when we really needed it. And just remember, the internet didn’t even exist in a popular capacity until 25 years ago, nor did it exist when Western civilisation was at its peak. It’s not something that is required for high civilisation. Just a few below: – Blair implied it was good for business but on the flipside, online shopping harms local business, feeding the globocorp beast, & encourages a sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for consumers. – Social media is not only addictive & harmful in itself, but again, encourages sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for the consumer, which also feeds into atomisation in a collective sense. – It globalises culture itself, you’re no longer focused on your immediate surroundings in your own nation. – Physically, beyond encouraging sedentary lifestyle, it also encourages harmful postures. – Mass access to porn (mass harm to both males & females), including children being exposed to it at a young age. Think about how dramatic of a change this is to pre-internet sexual development & interaction, even when considering post-legalised porn but still pre-internet sexual development & interaction. Also encouraging exponentially increasing production of it, which is where the female harm comes in more. – Shortens attention spans, makes people less intelligent, studies on smartphone usage among children show disturbing results. – Has allowed global movement of people to be streamlined, can attract scab & expansionist labour & foreign investors & consumers by advertising straight into their living rooms.
0 likes

Report
Relikt
5 days ago
Blair instinctually takes the National Socialist position on the trades. Joel’s derision of manual labor and manual laborers is incompatible with historic National Socialism. Read Darre’s Peasantry as the Lifeblood of the Nordic Race.
7 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
2 days ago
thank you for the book reference reminder! Darre’s book has been on my list for a while now, and its high time i actually downloaded a pdf and settled my ass down w/ a cup of warm brew and applied myself. Good seamless transition from my recent Madison Grant rereading-ritual, it had been 2years since i read it, and found my copy under my bed while cleaning the room *salivating even now at fond memory*
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
5 days ago
I’m two years younger than you Blair and I also remember what life was like before social media and smart phones. Crazy that Joel is only a few years younger and he can’t. Shows how much things changed around 2010. I disagree with Joel that social media is just socialising on the internet. It’s not truly socialising at all.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
birdhouse456
1 day ago
My sister is 9 years younger and I was amazed at the differences between us. Maybe with the pace of technology and the acceleration of social change the differences going to come more quickly. Speaking to a high school principal and a day care manager, they could spot the changes in lockdown kids straight away, even babies. My neighbour babysits and she noticed little kids not walking when they should have. Scary stuff. The thing is the young don’t know what they don’t know. The memories are fading. My mother went to school in a horse and cart and had kerosene lights at home, and Nan had to boil water in the copper to wash the laundry. I remember visiting the farm and at bathtime water was scarce and the dirtiest went in last. Most people even my age would think that happened 150 years ago. I’m really glad I those experiences, it keeps things in perspective. People needed each other more back then.
0 likes

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair’s being humble & Joel’s being arrogant by ranking themselves as 7s.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
You think Joel rating himself a 7 is too high? Why is that?
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
DaveScribe
4 days ago
Mullet with a Muslim beard isn’t a good look for a white man. He should really just cut his hair & keep his face shaved.
3 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
5 days ago
The “Lightning and Sun” reference and “man against the times” reference to AH was from Savitri Devi’s book “Lighting and Sun”. Very interesting theories by her.
4 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
One of the sexiest things about a woman is loyalty & a calm quiet demeanor. That is so incredibly rare in this day & time. I do not like talkative women. I do not find it cute. I find it obnoxious.
4 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GuidoSarduchi
19 hours ago
This is a very good observation. Im so use to the noise and hyperkinetic demeanor I have forgotten the allure of quiet humble beauty. I fear in particular, it is the white western woman who has succumbed to this. I can envision a quiet humble asian or persian beauty more prevalent than white. Fuck
0 likes

Report
Jak_85
Supporter
5 days ago
Blaire was absolutely cooking this episode. His take at 1:57 was really important to think about. Along with the Dunbar number take that Joel gave a label to.
3 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
5 days ago
Segregate internet by country
3 likes

Report
AvidFan
5 days ago
Great discussions. Hope you start to feel better soon, Blair.
2 likes

Report
mharrison52
5 days ago
spitting on christains is a jewish tradition.
2 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
Social media exhausts people.
2 likes

Report
TheShowgun
Supporter+
5 days ago
Blair, i get that annoying pain in that area every few months. Been like that my whole life idk why to this day, but it goes away after a few days.
2 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
Looking “pretty” in a photo means nothing. The modern-day woman is repulsive on the inside. The value women used to have is nearly gone. As a result, so is our civilization. Those women don’ even care. It is unbelievable how selfish & useless people have become.
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
3 days ago
Blair I agree with you women were different before social media took over. I’m 35 I remember how women use to be before the internet, idk now it just seems difficult to talk too them.
2 likes

Report
Calemanni
5 days ago
It sounds like Blair has a lot of inflammation. He should try a high fat carnivore or keto diet for the anti-inflammatory effects.
1 like

Report
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
You are absolutely right about woman and mens behavior on social media – jjews made it to turn us away from natural interaction within our own species, it means less white babies – I’m also old enough to remember the time before social media.
1 like

Report
Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
This is for Blair especially, but for all the tribe…. Man proposes, GOD disposes… I hope you all read the Bible! No .matter how much you think you are doing well, if you get too proud you will be humbled!
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham Sewell Bosi Zaric Rothchild Schwab DNA COUSINS SUMERIAN-ARAB Cohen haplogroup mtDNA C16360G ORGANISED CRIME FAMILY Publications by FAMILY members proudly announcing they are Sumerian Rabisu Jewish Cohen’s Priestley bloodline Who have 100% genetically engineered SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 IMMUNITY CULLING HUMANITY AS GODS DIVINE WILL (NEEDING FAMILY PRIESTLEY HELP) It even contains the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH) – the sub-sub-clade of the so-called “Y-chromosomal Aaron,” the most recent common ancestor of the majority of the patrilineal Jewish priestly caste or kohanim, who in Biblical terms was the brother of Moses (Exod. 4:14). Today, about half of all kohanim conform to the CMH. https://clangrahamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/House-GRAHAM-eBook.pdf
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 4 replies
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham and Sewell Cohen Haplogroup J referenced above and below, cousins interbreeding Robert Sewell’s Genealogy Site – Falaise Roll, Recording the Companions of William Duke of Normandy at the Conquest of England, online at http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html; What are the Jews? — Know thyself — William Sewell https://dokumen.pub/the-genealogical-science-the-search-for-jewish-origins-and-the-politics-of-epistemology-paperback-edition-9780226201405-0226201406-9780226154701-022615470x.html Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation by William Sewell (how SUMERIAN-ARAB J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G Jews Infiltrate and Setup Nationalist Groups to control opposition and Target any real leaders)
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Australian Nationalist Leader Thomas Sewell (cousin of both Jewish Professors) Professor Herb Sewell UK GOVERNMENT SARS-COV-2 COVID19 Recommendations THE SEWELL J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G IS 100% IMMUNE TO SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CANT BIND TO THEM OR ANYONE WHO HAS EATEN HUMAN BRAINS PINEAL GLAND CONSUMPTION HAS THAT PART OF MTDNA CHANGED SO THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS DNA-CNS INTERFACE REAL-TIME REMOTE CONTROL HUMAN DRONES WILL NOT WORK ON THEM ONLY THOSE THEY PLAN TO EAT Scientist warns UK not to rely on one dose of COVID vaccine Professor Herb Sewell https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/one-dose/102043/
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Living and serving in Israel-Palestine, with Richard Sewell the Dean of St George’s College, Jerusalem https://embraceme.org/podcast/in-conversation-with-richard-sewell The morning of her conversion to Judaism, Diana Sewell was so nervous she “was running around like a headless chicken” in her Australia home. her rabbi was dealing with computer difficulties. https://forward.com/news/359228/online-conversion-fulfills-a-dream-but-controversy-dogs-the-process/ If you share this with the Sewell Australian Nationalist they will instantly ban you, they are terrified the sheep they have made fools of will know the truth and hold them accountable https://t.me/joeldavis_x
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
https://jewishdata.com/jewish_genealogy_search/Sewell/- http://www.robertsewell.ca/sewell.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220207120211/http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html https://t.me/HCE_KAL/231
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Chink Question – Jul 4, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/11/joel-davis-the-chink-question-jul-4-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activist Joel Davis goes solo and discusses: the Melbourne homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers; history of the Chinese communist party; the possibility of war with China over Taiwan; Covid likely being an American attack on China; the need for Aussie Whites to join the movement.
0 likes

ProletAryan
5 days ago
cos everyone knows Australia doesn’t have enough overregulation and taxes!
0 likes

Report
walmartgolem
4 days ago
Melbourne is starting to resemble New York in the 70s/80s.
0 likes

Report
fdgrdfg
4 days ago
I like Blair’s take on social media
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
When you are robed Banks give you money if your bank card was stolen but no one give you back if you cash is stolen. Communist Police does nothing.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
non whites who work you tax them ex. 60-90 % who does not work you cut all social benefits, they will leave alone. No property sell allowed, no transfer of money.
0 likes

Report
theunbeholden
2 days ago
Grok went mecha Ah? Someone must have transcribed Europa Last Battle.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
2 days ago
Historically if the guilty party was of breeding age, execution for serious offences used to carry the added bonus of removing their bloodline from the gene pool.
0 likes

Report
KINGMAGNUSMUISC
2 days ago
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA
0 likes

Report
ggfr4nces
2 days ago
Blair is so f*cking funny in this one. Man is nuts
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
definitely just your average Frankston bogan chucking a fat skid on a Friday night with the boys, nothing out of the ordinary
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
I play cricket purely ro flex on pajeets funny enough it’s the same club Rukshan played for
0 likes

Report
StevenGurr
1 day ago
A lot of non whites have a European passport, they would need to be fucked off too
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
something happens but ultimately nothing happens, nothing will ever happen
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
nothing happened
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
21 hours ago
You always talk about how Australia is some defiant country but you guys are just as cucked as every other Western country
0 likes

Report
southdublinzoomer
18 hours ago
Politicians know they would eventually be on the receiving end of capital punishment if they ever reintroduced it. What they are doing to us and future unborn white generations is exponentially worse than any isolated instance of sexual crime.
0 likes

Report
GuidoSarduchi
16 hours ago
You said it, men following sports and buying jerseys are “spastics”. 2 wheeled motorsports is where its at. Motocross, enduro, GNCC racing, dakkar. If it has to be a team sport, than hockey
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 hours ago
There’s a White guy on X (permabulla) who says he worked on the Grok team and posted a screenshot showing how he added something to the code that enabled it to give responses without regard to being politically correct. He was fired afterward. That’s where Mechahitler came from.
0 likes

Report
pigger
Supporter
5 days ago
smile white boy
-1 likes

Report
Ruminoid
5 days ago
Social f’ing media / dating apps responsible for incredible damage … totally f’d up r’ships women have fallen for the trash.
-1 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 305. And we’re live tonight on Odysee, DLive, Rumble and Entropy. Please make sure you share this show because it’s going to be a good one. And you might be thinking, where is Thomas Sewell?

 

Well, I can tell you this now, we’ve been chatting for about 10, 15 minutes. He’s just making himself a coffee and he said he’d be back in a couple of moments. He said:

 

“Do you do an intro?”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah.”

 

“He says:

 

“Do you mind if I grab a coffee?”

 

Because I think there for him now it’s about 6 am in the morning, so obviously I appreciate him getting up at that time to do this show. So don’t worry, he is here. I’m just doing the intro.

 

Now, I’ve got a couple of things coming up later in the week. I’m live with Dr. David Duke at 4pm on Friday. I’m also doing a little pre-recorded video. It’s only a short one because I’ve been very busy with the baby, as you know and all the other stuff. And it’s about how quickly demographics can change. It’s actually about a borough in London that went from majority White British to White British being about 10% of the population in just two decades!

 

So that’s like about a generation, is all it took for the White Brits in that area to go from being the majority to being a very small minority, and not even the majority minority as they call it, where you know, the Whites are a minority but they’re the largest group. You know, Whites weren’t even the largest group in The Borough. Bangladeshis were. So anyway that’s coming out on Friday.

 

Then on Sunday I’m having another Australian on. I’m having Joel Davis on. Now Joel and me have been talking quite a bit recently. And Joel wants to discuss his essay, his sort of debate he’s been having with Keith Woods via a series of essays about National Socialism. And he’s very passionate about this. And I’m doing a bit of an interview saying:

 

“Can National Socialism be salvaged and is it a relevant ideology in the 21st century?”

 

And that’ll be with Joel Davis at 8pm on Sunday. So that’s going to be a bit of a sort of an interview, not really a debate because I want to hear his point of view. I am going to put some searching questions to him and I’ll be about a two hour show but that’ll be an hour later than usual. 8pm on Sunday. So if you want to hear Joel Davis on why he believes that National Socialism is still relevant and can be salvaged and why he thinks it’s important, I’m going to be showcasing that on Sunday at 8pm. So that’s what I got planned for the rest of the week.

 

Now, if you like this show, if you like the work I do, if you like the fact that I never give in, I never cuck, and I’m very, very consistent with my output, even when, you know my son is born, I’m here on a show with you guys, please do consider dropping a small donation. $3, $5, $10, whatever you can afford, whatever you think this show’s worth, whatever you think my work in the movement is worth, please consider supporting me. Because nothing goes behind a paywall and I have never, ever charged a penny for any of my work! Everything’s always been free.

 

And obviously tonight’s going to be a big interview.

 

So if you want to ask questions to myself and Thomas and the second hour of the show, you can do that by dropping a Superchat. And any paid Superchat we will read out in the second half of the show or ask relevant questions from the audience.

 

And as I said, uou can donate on Odysee, you can donate on Entropy, and we’ll read those out in the second half of the show. And it all goes to a good cause.

Anyway, let’s introduce tonight’s special guest. It is of course, Thomas Sewell.

 

Now, Thomas is from Australia and he is one of the most famous Australian nationalists. And the state have come down hard on him for that he has stood on a very, very firm platform. He has never cucked, he has never given an inch and he has kept fighting despite the incredible state oppression. He runs the National Socialist Network. They are a very active protest and advocacy group which also helps young males with their self esteem and fitness. They do a number of very, very provocative protests, but they’ve been gaining a lot of support and as such, the state are coming down hard on them with some of the most draconian legislation that Australia has ever seen! Something that brings Australia in line with the likes of Britain and Germany with Hate Speech laws and even jailing people for raising their right arm.

 

But this hasn’t beaten down Tom. He still leads the group. The group keeps on growing and their protests get ever more provocative. And they will not be beaten.

 

So, Tom, how are you doing this morning? It’s morning for you, evening for us. I hope you’re well. How’s things going down there?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we are engaged on all fronts.

 

So we’re keeping very busy. We are doing a lot of background work at the moment because of the lawfare we’ve encountered. So our first objective is to maintain the organisation momentum. But we’re definitely in the trenches. So I like to compare it to manoeuvre warfare. And this is obviously not endorsement of any paramilitary strategy, Just the notion that you can study politics and you can study war, and you’ll find that they’re basically the same thing.

 

[05:37]

 

And I think most of the people in the audience have a quite almost autistic understanding of World War II history and the blitzkrieg or manoeuvre warfare. They have an understanding that the First World War was a failed strategy. The idea of trench warfare and trying to bleed the enemy dry in this kind of sense. It’s not an effective strategy if you have a smaller economy than your enemy. And that’s what the Germans figured out pretty early on in the war, in the First World War, hence the Second World War, when people were able to be mobilised, so to speak, you saw these very, very deep, penetrating warfare, manoeuvre warfare movements.

 

And I think that we need to take that strategy to politics. I think we’ve always taken that strategy to politics, Even if we’ve used quite a vocal and almost abrasive terms, to most people within the general public, that is what penetration does of the psyche, because politics is really about penetration of the psyche.

 

And I believe that the conservative model is trench warfare. I believe that they don’t want to take ground. It’s too dangerous to take ground because the enemy’s too established in their position, and they need to just hold ground. And you can never win a war, or a political conflict by just defending, by just holding ground. Obviously, we’ve seen the Conservatives concede and concede and concede by an enemy that is just innumerable and has a has a better fighting spirit than the conservative weak Right.

 

And so we’re trying to get mobile again. We’re just currently in the trenches, but it’s okay. There’s always time to consolidate and work out your logistics and move forward.

 

But I think we’ve got about 34 court cases at the moment that have built up over the last year or so. and this is obviously the main system of the state to bog us down. And the spring will come, the snow will melt, the mud will clear, and we’ll be on our way soon. We’ve just got to win one crucial court battle to get things back up and running again. And that’s going to be the most important, but not actually the most expensive. We’ve actually had a lot of really expensive court battles over the last three years. But we need one critical, like a wonder weapon to get us mobile again, which is going to be in the High Court.

 

So that’s what we’re working towards. And that will free up a lot of our organisation to continue operating the way it is and the way it’s winning and the way we’re taking ground, the way we’re penetrating through and shifting that Overton Window. We are the fighters on the Right. Well, I’ll be careful with my language. You know, we’re streaming in Britain, but we are the political movers on the Right versus the political trench warfares on the Right, the Conservatives. And we’re actually the movers. We’re actually shifting the line. And that’s why they want to tangle us up in the barbed wire. So, yeah.

 

Mark Collett: I do agree with your analogy. And one of the books I recommend people read is The Art of War, because I think The Art of War is directly applicable to politics. I would say that and Machiavelli’s The Prince are two books that are very helpful to outsider politicians.

 

Now, one of the sort of tools that you guys use so effectively is you are a small group, and I don’t mean that in an insulting way, and you punch well above your weight.

 

Now, obviously, ethno-nationalist groups are usually small groups because most normal people are quite scared to be involved because of the repercussions. And it takes quite brave men to be involved in a cause like this because you stand to lose an awful lot by being involved in this cause.

 

I mean, I know you have personally been harassed by the police. And you face incarceration regularly.

 

But one of the things I’ve got to say is you guys, you punch well above your weight. And with the use of your sort of provocative rhetoric and your provocative protests, you get notice, and you get far more publicity than a lot of maybe, you know, larger in membership terms, but more milquetoast groups.

 

And I’ve seen people in the past criticise groups for doing this. One of the guys historically that got criticised for this approach was George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

But as Warren Balogh said the other week, people today are still talking about George Lincoln Rockwell. He’s still a guy that inspires people to this day and still inspires people in the media even to write articles about him, even though he’s long gone. And you guys are treading that path now. But arguably times are far more oppressive now than they were in Rockwell’s time.

 

Now, when you do get these media blitz moments where everybody’s talking about you, is that something that you’re sort of really gunning for and how does that affect the organisation? Are you bringing in a lot of young blood from those articles?

 

[10:52]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re getting a lot more support from the wider community, from Conservatives that are switching sides, that are switching strategy. They’re starting to believe that we do need to have pushers and movers and shakers on the Right, that we need agitators, that we need a far-Right. That without a far-Right, we can’t have anything that we want, even if we don’t agree with everything that the far-Right agrees with but what I’ve often found with a lot of these supporters, for example, for every hundred people that contact us, probably almost 90 want to support us. They reach out because they want to support us. They want to be involved in a political party or they want to be involved in some sort of pay a little bit of money, get a little pin and say:

 

“Thanks, guys, I’ve done my job.”

 

They want to send a little present to the front line, so to speak, the political front line. They don’t actually want to go sit in the trenches with you and work out how to take ground. But about maybe 10 out of a hundred, probably 10%, are actually keen to get involved and join in. And honestly, they come from all demographics. They come from all demographics. For every, for every 18 or 21 year old that we recruit, we recruit a 44 year old with three kids.

 

So that’s something that we never used to have. And we’re seeing the movement, we’re seeing men that actually have something to lose, realizing that this isn’t just the strongest horse, but there isn’t actually an alternative. And if we don’t start building the manpower at this level, we’re never going to see change in this country.

 

So the other conversation I think you asked about getting in the media spotlight, our objective isn’t to get in the media spotlight as much as it is, because that obviously helps shift the Overton Window in of itself. It’s not spotlight for spotlight’s sake. Like, I know that’s not what you’re suggesting, but that is sort of what some people suggest. A lot of our critics in the more moderate Right they just say that we’re just doing this purely to get attention. And that’s not actually how politics works. We’re doing it so that we can present as the only legitimate opposition to the system. Because the system is obviously a Uni-party. And when people are watching the television, the system is agreeing with each other on everything that is important to, for there to be an opposition. There is no opposition when it’s a major subject.

 

And then the Left and the Right disagree on things that are irrelevant, things that are minute. And we are trying to not just bring ourselves into the picture, but bring those important conversations that are being avoided by the mainstream parties and forcing them, forcing them into a position where they’re defending an indefensible position! Whether that be Drag Queen Story Hour like this tranny nonsense, whether it be mass immigration, whether it be laws against free speech. By forcing their hand, by forcing them to react in the stupid and silly and overconfident ways that they have, they lose legitimacy way faster than we gain 100 members. And that’s a hard thing to measure. And that’s what a lot of people, I guess on the tactical level, they don’t understand about the strategic level. They think like, we’ve had some rallies where things haven’t gone to plan. People have been a little bit upset afterwards and morale has been low.

 

And what I’ve said to people is:

 

“Don’t worry about where your morale is right now. Like, you guys have done a good job. We got this message on the table. Give it the next couple weeks, See the news articles that come out, see how the system overreacts, overplays its hand.”

 

See how the public, even if they don’t support us, that because in the early days, the public didn’t support us at all! They do now, but they didn’t support us at all in the early days. But what it did was it made the public not support the regime! And that is more important than getting public support, is making the public turn against the regime. Because regime legitimacy and regime support is at an all time low!

 

And obviously there needs to be an alternative. But alternatives are often built in vacuums. Like serious alternatives are built in vacuums. You can only really build a vanguard. You can only build that Spearhead. You can only build that very small formed body of volunteers in the early days when system legitimacy is really high. And so attacking the system’s legitimacy is actually more important. Making the system attack its own legitimacy is actually far more important than 15 seconds of fame.

 

But we’ve had so many segments of 15 seconds of fame that we are starting to become, you know, household names or even folk heroes to some people. You know, we’re the Kelly gang, we’re the agitators, we’re Eureka Stockade, we’re the Aussie battler, we’re the underdog!

 

And a lot of people respect us and a lot of people recognise us in the street. And our allies are growing and are numerous and a lot of people are jumping ship from the regime to support us in our attacks against the regime, our political attacks against the regime.

 

So we’re in a struggle for our survival.

 

And I do also believe that fame is important. I do also believe that the spotlight is important. If the spotlight’s not on us, who’s it on? And you know, and I’m sure most of the audience are also concerned about the ever growing presence of bad faith actors that the system is building in a lab. We see them pop up on Twitter all the time, these nobodies that have never done anything, that have never built a group. They don’t have any community behind them and they don’t have any media experience by the looks of it. And then suddenly the algorithm is putting them in everyone’s feed and they’ve got 300,000, 500,000, 700,000 in such a short period of time, followers on social media.

 

These people are very concerning because these people are obviously part of the regime trying to not necessarily bait and switch, but the regime trying to transform and mutate and synthesize our talking points to then redirect them back into ultimately, obviously, if it doesn’t appear right now, ultimately back into system legitimacy. And the greatest of all time, in my opinion, is Donald Trump, in that regard. He absolutely perfected dog whistling our talking points and continues to do things and say things in the immediate that are in White interests. But then very quickly he works out a way to mutate them into jewish interests.

 

[17:49]

 

 

So that’s also why fame is important. Because if they’re talking about you, like if America had a genuine, well, obviously there’s some guys rising stars, like Thomas Rousseau, for example. But if America had a genuine Right-wing alternative over the last 15 years, you would find that, I mean, there was some guys and certainly they were put in prison. Unfortunately, as we know, that’s what the system does. If they see someone of high value, they put him in prison, a lot of the time.

 

But yeah, Donald, Donald Trump wouldn’t have found his feet so easily, I think if there was an established Right-wing alternative the way there are in European politics.

 

But with the Uni-party and with it being 49-49% Democrat, Republican, that’s America is in the most dangerous situation with that to continue to occur. And our goal has to be in Britain and Australia to transition more into those European style politics to attack system legitimacy and let other people fill that vacuum and then see where we’re heading, what our timeline is.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think it’s really interesting what you’re doing in another sense as well, because the Left have always been very, very successful in that they’ve always pushed boundaries.

 

So the Left have got where they are not by towing a line, not by being polite, not by accepting their enemies arguments or playing by their enemy’s rules. The Left have created their own rules and they’ve put pushed every single boundary as hard and fast as possible.

 

Now, on the other side of the political spectrum, the sort of quote, unquote, “Right” has largely believed that if they tone down what they say if they play the game, if they adhere to the Left’s playbook and the Left’s sort of language rules, they will be more acceptable and be more successful as a result. And this has tended to lead to not just sort of punching Right, but it’s tended to lead to a fragmentation on the Right where you have groups that are closer to the sort of conservative centre spending more time attacking groups to the right of them rather than what the Left do.

 

So the Left have the centrist Left groups, but they actually support groups to the Left of them because they realise that the groups to the Left of them are involved in the same tug of war and pulling in the direction they want to go.

 

And I think the NSN really is sort of one of the leading, if not the leading group in the Anglo-sphere now for pushing the argument as far as it can go in the direction that many Conservatives have given up on. And saying all that as a follow up to this point, would you say that you get more attacks from the Left or more attacks from establishment Conservatives? Because I often find that when someone does raise the issue of radical ethno-nationalism or as you guys do, National Socialism, often more attacks flow from the sort of centrist conservative right than they do from the Left.

 

Thomas Sewell: Hmm. Now I don’t have a solid answer for you on that one because it changes. It does change. We do find that the centre Right often has a strategy of asphyxiation, where they just, they refuse to talk about us. They don’t want to acknowledge their competitor, so to speak, for space in the Right. But, and you’ll find that the Left establishment will attack us constantly. But then sometimes it changes over. The Left get their act together and they start ignoring us and they start actually taking their own advice, which is asphyxiation. And then what you find is the centre Right have a habit of attacking us again from the position that:

 

“We don’t love Israel. And these are evil. They’re bad for the jewish community!”

 

And they’ll attack us for social cohesion. Because they don’t want to necessarily use the word far-Right extremists. They obviously have to frame the argument against us differently to how the Left frame it.

 

And so what they’re doing at the moment is they’re saying that:

 

“We’re bad for social cohesion and we have to protect multiculturalism because these people are bad, they’re troublemakers.”

 

I think the opposition leader [Dutton*] who’s soon to be prime minister said that:

 

“We were losers with no friends, and that we’re awful!”

 

And that was really interesting because we have a lot of friends. We just don’t, we just don’t take jewish money like he does. Scukg on we, yeah, we just have different friends. Our friends are all people that care about this country. His friends are all people that want to destroy the country.

 

[* Peter Craig Dutton (born 18 November 1970) is an Australian politician and former police detective serving as the current Leader of the Opposition, holding office as the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia since May 2022. He has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the division of Dickson since 2001. Dutton previously served as the minister for Defence from 2021 to 2022 and the minister for Home Affairs from 2017 to 2021. He held various ministerial positions from 2004 to 2022 in the governments of Howard, Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison. Dutton grew up in Brisbane. He worked as a police officer in the Queensland Police for nearly a decade upon leaving school, and later ran a construction business with his father. He joined the Liberal Party as a teenager and was elected to the House of Representatives at the 2001 election, aged 30.]

 

So everyone’s got friends in politics.

 

But what they mean is obviously that we are, yeah, we’re not a “system approved” ideology and therefore they should be discredited. But the problem with that rhetoric coming from the system is that no one likes it anymore. It’s unpopular. It’s never been so unpopular.

 

So calling us the outsider is actually playing into our playbook and I think they know that, but they’re just ill disciplined. But yet, in short, to answer your question, yeah, we get attacked from, I think both sides equally. I don’t really keep track of it as well as I probably should, because I’m just focused on destroying their legitimacy and focus on building ours.

 

[23:27]

 

 

Mark Collett: Well, one of the things I’ve noticed of late is around the world, in every White country, there now seems to be a huge divide which is largely being pushed by the Trump-Musk regime. So Trump and Musk have captured Twitter and they are now saying that:

 

“You can be a nationalist on Twitter as long as you are not openly an ethno-nationalist. And as long as you support Israel.”

 

So genuine radical groups such as NSN, Patriotic Alternative, the NJP, when they were active Patriot Front, they’ve been completely taken off it. The Nordic Resistance, there have been almost every genuine radical group there are. You know, there are no radical groups in the UK still allowed on Twitter. They’ve been completely cleansed. And it seems to be that this new, you know, Elon Musk era of Twitter is almost as censorious as the previous one. But previously you had to play by the Left-wing rulebook, but now you have to play by the sort of Zio-Right, you know, pro-Israel, don’t push it too far, rollback. It’s not genuine free speech. And I was appalled when all you guys lost your Twitter accounts because people like Joel were blowing up on a daily basis there.

 

And I noticed one thing that was really interesting. Every time you guys got into a debate with an Australian politician, even if that went right to the top, like the Prime Minister, you guys were completely destroying them. And there seemed to be a very, very positive reaction, especially from young males in Australia to the policies you guys are pushing.

 

And obviously I watch, strangely enough, out of all the political shows that are on social media, I actually tend to watch you, Joel and Blair the most, because you’re on at about 10, 11 o’clock my time in the morning.

 

So I’m always sat at the computer, working there and having something on to listen to is always great. And you guys are always on. And listening to the stride you made into that sort of young, disaffected White male sector of Australian politics, which has been completely neglected, was amazing!

 

But how do you feel now moving forward without Twitter? Do you think that’s going to limit you to a large degree?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s limiting us a little bit. But we were getting ahead of ourselves. So apologies for those that don’t like the blitzkrieg references, but we pushed so far into the enemy territory, we dragged that Overton Window so far across and had so many successes that we were running out of supplies.

 

And so in my perspective, it was Adolf Hitler says:

 

“There’s always a silver lining. Every defeat can be turned into a victory.”

 

And I truly believe that if you actually look at what the universe is asking of you, or God, then it’s very clear that we were stretching our supply lines thin. The structure of our organisation needed to be addressed, our recruitment needed to be addressed. Just the management of the organisation as a whole, we were evolving into that next stage where we needed to develop more junior leaders and more people to manage region reps and stuff like that. And this is where our focus needs to be for the first half of this year.

 

And obviously all the legal cases and having clarity, we couldn’t just keep doing what we were doing. If we did, we would have ended up. I think I gained about 20,000 followers in about two or three months.

 

And so I went from getting my account back, I think I got, when I got it back, I think there was a 9,000 followers on it. And because obviously I had it for a short period of time last year before it was deleted. When I got it back, I was smaller than most of the Australian politicians and within two months I was much larger than most Australian politicians with far greater reach, despite the sort of tenfold they’ve got, like a tenfold. I noticed that you’ll get about 10 times as many likes as you do views in proportion to other accounts. So that obviously that nerfing or that bottling of the reach. I was still getting far more reach than all of these you know, Mark Dreyfus and James Patterson and you know, Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese [PM], like some of them are senior people within the Australian government. The ones that are writing the laws to have us locked up for destroying them on Twitter. They were just getting absolutely pillaged in their supply lines. They had no support. All of our support was mounting. And the public that’s on Twitter, which is probably hundreds of thousands of Australians they were loving it! They were enjoying it. They were loving it that someone was sticking it to the man, so to speak.

 

And even though we’re not on Twitter anymore, that doesn’t really matter because we pushed so much, for now. Obviously next year it might be good to get back on Twitter. And that ties in with some other logistics issues that we’ve got to deal with and I think registering as a registered and recognised political organisation within the Australian Electoral Commission will give us a huge advantage in terms of maintaining our social media, because then you can get that government check mark.

 

And that’s something that I think Twitter would have a very hard job at censoring once you’re technically recognised as being part of the government, even if you don’t have any MPs or Senators. But to be an actual political, registered political organisation, which is just something that we’re looking at over about a 12, 18 month period. We’ve got some other things to deal with first, but then we’ll get to it.

 

[29:17]

 

But as I was saying, because I can still go on Twitter, I can’t like anything. You can’t see my account. But I’m still, I’m still on there, just viewing occasionally, probably too much because I’ve got a lot on my plate. But what I’ve noticed is that you have not just disaffected young White men on there, you have a lot of middle aged men and women, you have a lot of grandmas, you have a lot of mums and dads on there with their full name and their profile photo echoing our talking points almost to the word and becoming political commentators on their own without getting shadow banned because they’re not on the government register of naughty boys or naughty girls.

 

And they’re getting in some cases 10 times the reach that we’re getting just as average Joes and without a political organisation, but building up a huge social media profile. And their talking points are spot on! And they’re calling out, you know the fact I just looked at it this week, Australia brought in 200,000 Indians this month for student visas!

 

Obviously they’re all returning back to university so that’s going to be a big influx this month.

 

But I think it’s been 700,000 since last year and, or since the last season or however it works. But I’m seeing figures pop up. I’m not looking too hard at the exact nitty-gritty of it, But I’m seeing 200,000 in a month, 700,000 in a year. And the Australians are just going wild over this. This is insane!

 

And none of the political parties are looking to do anything about it.

 

And what I’m seeing in the comments section from basically everyone in these threads, not NSN members, not radical far-Right extremists, I’m just seeing from everyone saying:

 

“Mass deportations!”

 

And so that’s what we were on Twitter to say, and people are saying it now. So we’ve broken through the enemy lines and the trenches have now caught up to us.

 

And I said that about Drag Queen Story hour. No one in Australia protested Drag Queen Story out until we did. We did it a couple times and then we never needed to do it again because the Conservatives or you know, the centre Right and these alternative Right-wing people that are still within the realms of the mainstream, they started holding that ground for us. We took the ground, they hold the ground. We take the ground, they hold the ground! That’s it!

 

That’s how it works. We are on the offence, we are offensive, we go on the offence. And then these people fill in the ranks and they bolster and they hold the ground. And that’s a position that’s never going to shift. Now that trench where, where the centre Right is at in Australia, where the average Australian person is at, that doesn’t feel that they identify with the Liberal Party or Labour Party, which is our two major parties, where they’re. And probably most people within the Liberal Party, but they’re probably quiet about it. Where they believe right now is that mass deportations it’s not a debate, it’s not negotiable.

 

And then the system is coming out, especially the premier [Chris Minns] of New South Wales, who’s an idiot, which is the biggest state in Australia, New South Wales, he’s come out and said that:

 

“Freedom of speech is incompatible with multiculturalism, and that’s why you’re not having it. You’re not allowed freedom of speech. It’s incompatible. And we choose multiculturalism and social cohesion.”

 

And so you’re not getting your rights back. And that is just a fucking, … A lot of guys in our camp have been saying, Chris Minns must be our guy, he must be an accelerationist. You know, he must just be an infiltrator within the system that’s just crashing and burning the Labour Party and the Liberal Party, the Uni-Party, because that is the dumbest fucking thing a politician could ever say to a bunch of White people.

 

And it just shows how out of touch they are. Obviously it has consequences for political activists. As we are all aware of, senior political activists and senior spokespeople are going to bear the brunt of these laws. People like myself and Jacob Hersant and Joel Davis and potentially even people like Blair Cottrell and a lot of other guys that are periphery to the movement or periphery to the organisation, but deeply within the movement.

 

And I don’t think we’re at British style laws yet, but we are definitely one step closer. We are definitely getting very close to those British style laws, which again gives us time to go back to the drawing board as to what our strategy is going forward and what’s our Left and Right of us. Because as you said earlier, our objective has always been to put forward the most radical, lawful position!:

 

“What is the line in the sand? Where is it? And let’s go right up to that line in the sand and test their nerve!”

 

And we’ve done that quite successfully with only a couple entrapment operations, only a couple of us going to prison. And we’re out of prison now, and I’m sure there’s more prison time to do, unfortunately. But that’s not going to stop us, is it? Because we’re going to secure the existence of our people!

 

[34:09]

 

 

Mark Collett: So if you guys did pursue elections, would you be pursuing the elections with the goal of winning, or would you be pursuing the elections with the goal of getting yourself into potential TV debates or town hall debates, where you might not go out there to win, but you go out there to upend the system and to shift the Overton Window? Because I’m not sure whether the world is ready quite yet to vote for the majority of people to vote for a group like yours.

 

But I do think people would turn up at a town hall debate in greater numbers because you’re there. And I do think you would be the ones that, whether you won or not, you would be the ones everyone was talking about.

 

And I think there’s a I think it’s sort of like when David Duke stands. You know, David Duke stands and he knows now because of the demographic shift, that it’s very unlikely that he wins. But when he attends a debate, he knows that the numbers watching are going to be boosted by sort of 20, 30% just because he’s there. And his talk of Israel, where the where American money goes, AIPAC*, you know, jewish control of the media. By raising those issues in that way, in such a sort of public spectacle, it does shift the Overton Window. So would you be going out there to actually win, or would you be more going out there to sort of hijack the whole process and really upend the political system in your own way?

 

[* AIPAC: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is a pro-Israel lobbying group that advocates its policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States. One of several pro-Israel lobbying organisations in the country, it has been called one of its most powerful lobbying groups.]

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a very good question.

 

And I think that any leader, any organisation, should be honest with its supporters and with its members so that they know what they’re getting into. And I don’t think that you should start any process without that honesty. And you shouldn’t start any process, I think, without the intention to win! We have to have an intention to win!

 

Now, what does winning look like?

 

Now, that is another question in itself. I believe that it is possible for significant change to happen within the Parliament system, but ultimate change is not possible.

 

And so in the past, I have echoed the talking point, the very radical talking point, that there is no “political solution”, which is often misused and misunderstood by people that are edgy and angry and online. But what that really means is that there’s no ultimate Parliamentarian solution. That’s kind of the fine print of the subject. There is no political solution.

 

Obviously the system itself, the regime wishes to conflate that statement with one of illegal activity, which it isn’t! That’s not actually what that statement means, even if it’s misused by a small percentage of people. What “no political solution” means is that it’s mostly a statement of motivation for people to realise that Parliament does not change society. Society has to change so that Parliament changes that. The solution to the problem is to change the culture, the political culture to then impact Parliament.

 

And so many people are focused on the political party route and they’re thinking that:

 

“Oh, if we only we election harder, if only we hand out more leaflets, if only we., ..!”

 

And they’re working harder, but they’re not working smarter. They’re kind of stuck in the political factory mindset where they’re in the factory and they’re building. I’ve worked in a steel frame factory when times were tough and it’s probably not the worst job I’ve ever had, but it was the lowest paying job I ever had. And you know, when I first got doxed. And I was in the factory and you’re screwing off thousands of screws a day into these steel frames to build prefab walls and no matter how fast you screw off those frames, you’re not getting out of poverty. It’s not possible. You are stuck there. You have to think smarter, you have to work smarter, not harder. You’re never getting out of that poverty once you’re there.

 

So that’s the same mentality that people need to understand when they’re getting involved in party politics is that it’s not about electioning anywhere near as much as it is about shifting the culture and attitudes of the society which you’re running for Parliament is meant to be only one small component of and so I have dedicated, I have stated to my cadre, to my core members that:

 

“Yes, we are building a political party, no, we are not changing direction at, at the absolute maximum, 25% of our resources is going to be going towards this project. The majority of our resources still needs to go towards this overused term meta-political shift.”

 

And what I’m much more focused on at the moment than building a political party, despite the fact that it’s the news everywhere that everyone’s talking about and everyone’s saying:

 

“Oh, you know what’s this political party going to look like? What’s it going to be like? And you know, when are you going to launch it so I can sign up and be a member?”

 

What I’m actually focusing on more than anything is aesthetics. Aesthetics! I believe that the Right-wing, and this is a little bit of channeling the esoteric Bowdenism, but we need vitality! If the pro-White position, if the National Socialist position, if fascism, if radical nationalism, if whatever we want to call it’s irrelevant to me in some ways, but I think fascism is a pretty cool brand. We need to make a brand! It’s the brand power, it’s the staying power, it’s the aesthetic power of delivering a worldview through visual, through spectacle! The great masses of people, they know in their hearts that we are endeared to Australia. They know that we care about this country and we want the best for everyone in it. But they are caught up in the spectacle, in the bread and circuses of modern political culture. 21st century, boring Left versus Right political culture.

 

And what I’m focused on more than a political party is how do we bring vitality and vigor and strength and esthetics into the political conversation! Because to me, most people already agree with our talking points, so we don’t really need to educate them much to support us.

 

And on top of esthetics, there needs to be a way of interpreting the carrot and stick dynamic into the political arena. And so we are mostly stick as a political entity and yourself as a political entity.

 

A lot of people on the street may support us, but we think it’s just stick, stick, stick! They just think it’s fascism, it’s authoritarianism, or it’s radical nationalism. And we’re just going to start beating people with sticks in the street and they’re just going to be like:

 

“Well, they don’t hate me, so they’re not going to beat me with a stick. That’s why I support them.”

 

And it’s like, what is the carrot? What is the carrot? And there has to be a balancing act of that.

 

And that’s why, for what we’re trying to do with the launching of the political party or the policies is trying to have a balancing act between carrot and stick. So that’s very important to us.

 

[41:41]

 

And the last point that I’ll make on the subject is you asked me about what is going to be our sort of goals with making the party within the political system. And what I’d say is this, that those goals are ever evolving.

 

Of course the goals initially in launching is to show people that there’s an alternative and maybe you know, rabble raise and cause enough stir that we can get one or two guys in the Senate. We’re not going to be getting any MPs anytime soon, and it would be delusional to think that we are. We have to have a rational approach to it. It’d be good to get one guy in, even if that takes us five or seven years. That would be, that would be difficult. But at least we’ve got a representative and we can keep focusing on what our actual meta-political and community building and you know, White fortressing and everything else that we’re doing. All of these projects, the culture shift, the aesthetic shift, the active club shift, all of these things are so absolutely crucial!

 

And then not ultimately, but then the middle goal would be to be the tiebreaker and that’s the term that a lot of people are using. That worst case scenario. All that we’re ever going to be able to accomplish over the next 20 years is be a tiebreaker. That’s the sort of realistic worst case scenario that we could probably get a couple seats and sort of like what the BNP did and get up to that sort of 7%, maybe 8% total population. And that’s best case scenario. But that 7 or 8% could be a massive tiebreaker and help shift Australian politics into a more dynamic and fluid European style politics where 8% is actually a really big party. Where 8% could be the third or fourth biggest party in the country. Well, I think at the moment 8% would be the third or fourth biggest party. But ideally that 8% would come from smashing the centre parties, and there would be a lot of 8% parties. That would be the ideal scenario for us.

 

And then forming not coalitions of ideology but coalitions of convenience to ally with other smaller parties to be able to vote against and take away power from the Uni party. Because we can’t have any Parliamentary change until we smash the Uni party. Until we smash the centre two parties into a million pieces, there won’t be any Parliament change because they’re just too powerful and there’s just too many of them. So our goal shouldn’t be necessarily immediately to try to take power. Our goal should be to take away power from those that currently have it and to introduce a little bit of chaos into the system to create a vacum that can be filled later.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I agree. I think part of what we do has always got to be taking a message to people that’s going to provoke a reaction. Now you want two reactions from people. You want the people who like you to be cheering and the people who dislike you to be wailing. So you make the maximum amount of sound possible with what you do.

 

Now, something else that we do is we do a lot of legal work, we do a lot of advocacy, we do a lot of help with young men.

 

So this week I helped the young guy who’s been struggling to get a job. He’s been in the doldrums, but helped him with a CV. This is something that I do regularly and help people with sort of training for interviews, for going for a job. We do legal advocacy and we do a series of different sort of training seminars, helping young people with life skills, things like that.

 

And I think that one of the things that’s missing amongst the White community, well, firstly, we’re not a community. But as soon as we stopped being a community, there stopped being a support network.

 

And I think that something that we do here that I’m particularly proud of is providing that support network. So Patriotic Alternative has already helped this year with several legal cases, one employment tribunal and one other legal case. And we’re always doing this to help people who’ve been discriminated against. Do you think the National Socialist Network will get involved in that kind of advocacy as well, or is that something you’re already doing?

 

[45:50]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re already doing it a little bit on the side. So we have something, we have a similar tribunal, it’s called the Fair Work Commission, for when guys get doxed and lose their jobs.

 

So we’re always providing basic administrative advice for how to guys to engage in those processes, because it’s obviously unjust and improper for someone to be fired for their political views. And often they get a good result and they get a little bit of a payout and then, but “the process is the punishment”. You know, they, they’ve lost a job in the industry they actually want to work in. I’ll preface this whole conversation with what I’ve been telling my junior leaders as of the last sort of nine months, which is that their main trade is politics! What I’ve been teaching my guys, the guys that are region reps and sort of little branch reps, is that this is actually long term, their trade.

 

So whatever you’re doing for a job, whatever you’re doing for your career, whatever your trade is at the moment, whether you’re an engineer, whether you’re a lawyer, whether you’re a dentist, or a doctor, or a plumber, or a carpenter, regardless of all those things, you need to be starting to transition over the next 10 years or five years, depending on how high you are within the organisation structure. You need to be starting to think:

 

“Well, I’m doing 40 hours a week hitting nails into wood. How many hours a week am I learning statecraft?”

 

Because what we need to do more than engage in party politics is actually build a shadow government. We need to build an opposition government. We need to build a government, not a political party.

 

And that’s what I’ve always told people, that we are currently engaged in the endeavour of building a political party. But from day one, we have been engaged in building a government. And so a government provides services to its people.

 

So obviously an intelligent White nationalist organisation or ethno-nationalist organisation engages in some sort of quasi government service with its people. And it needs to be balanced. It needs to be balanced. You know, stick and carrot or, … That’s probably not a good term for talking about your own people. That’s more talking about the wider population that doesn’t really get it yet, but it is important to balance. It’s a very fine balancing act between the feminine and masculine forces of politics. And the feminine forces, I think, of politics. Well, that’s one way of looking at it. You could divide it as feminine or masculine, or you could divide it as fighting and logistics. You could, you could look at it from the perspective that the Taliban are the government in Afghanistan at the moment. And they obviously had people fighting us, fighting the Australians, fighting the British, fighting the Americans in open warfare.

 

But if you look at it purely from a political perspective, a lot of their success was the fact that they actually controlled vast swathes of the rural society. They governed over that society before they governed over the cities. And when we have the so-called fall of Afghanistan and the Taliban rule as of 2020 under the late Trump and Biden administration, what we’re really seeing is not the Taliban take over all of a sudden, nothing to everything, we’re just seeing them take over the cities. They already ruled the countryside, they already provided services to the countryside within their own rulebook, what they perceived to be the rule of law through obviously Sharia. They then implemented that on the fake astroturfed Afghani liberal democracy that was never going to be able to be sustainable in Afghanistan because it’s not real, it’s fake and gay.

 

So likewise, our people need to have a sense of loyalty to our mission based off the theoretical, which is, sorry, the ideas space, but unfortunately, well not necessarily unfortunately. But the reality is that that’s only a certain percentage of politically effective and politically active and politically thinking people of all different ages and also male and female, men and women. But the average Joe is thinking more in Terms of Services, more in terms of not what I can do for the state or for the folk or for the government, but what’s the government or the state or the nationalist organisation can do for them. So it does have to be a balancing act.

 

Obviously our main disagreement, which we don’t need to get into is that I ban picking up rubbish, for example, But I will change my policy on that when we actually have a suburb, when we have a suburb and when we have a town and when we have a park that we visit all the time and we actually have a sense of community, because we don’t, like as White people. There is no White National Park. There is no White public hall or public park or anything like this. When that occurs, I will change my policy on obviously keeping our streets clean.

 

But I do think that, and I do like what you guys and Patriot Front have done in terms of disaster relief. And we actually for the first time ever did a little bit with the storms up in Queensland. Not this time, but I think. Oh, sorry, both times.

 

So last year and this year there were some storms in Queensland and some of our guys, we didn’t promote it as much as maybe we should have or could have. But we’re not looking at this stage to over inflate our sense of community service because we’re not doing that much community service. So we are focusing on the political first and community service in the background.

 

But yes, certainly an expanded answer as well on the subject of a legal lobby and on lawfare. And we, every organisation that wishes to succeed in this game, yours, mine, Patriot Front, needs to have multiple wings, multiple arms. And I do appreciate the way that the British, that yourself and others, have focused quite heavily on building the infrastructure. Because every country, every White country doesn’t just need a White vanguard, doesn’t just need a White political force or meta-political force, but it does also need, … Because what is a meta-political force, it’s a way of achieving a political goal without the, just the direct and obvious route of Parliamentary politics. And so everything is political power.

 

[52:10]

 

And that’s what I tell people A petrol station, or a service station is technically political power, it’s meta-political power. But it is like investing in your own community is a political action. You know, building a political lobby group is political power. So we do need to have all of our white-collar people combining forces and working together as a team and building these, … We’ve got an overarching model where it’s not actually called the NSN, it’s called White Australia. And we have the NSN as our primary activist network. We have the EAM [European Australian Movement] which is our active club organisation which has been running just as long as NSN.

 

And a lot of people been confused of that is are you NSN or are you EAM? And it’s like, well look, for all public purposes I guess we’re NSN, but we’ve always had EAM running in the background as more of a community building and active club operation.

 

And obviously what we’re transitioning into is how do we go about building, like we don’t have a name for it. We’ve got a team of guys at the moment, some within the Org itself and some people that we’ve recruited from outside the Org that don’t want to necessarily run around the park and do push ups or run around the street in black block saying “Australia for the White man”. But they do believe Australia is for the White man.

 

And so we’re trying to build a team that. I don’t have a name for it just yet, but I’ll come up with one eventually when it’s necessary. That yeah, their main focus is just lawfare. Their main focus is just getting judgements at higher levels of court so that the political rights of Australians are protected, whether that be to do with freedom of speech, which we actually do have in Australia. We do! And that’s what’s being contested at the moment is we’ve got two different sets of laws in Australia that are contradictory to each other. And we’re the guys are going to be going to the High Court saying:

 

“Well hang on a minute, you can’t exist in a state of here’s four judgements within our constitution saying we have free speech and here’s four new laws that have been passed in the last 12 months that say we don’t have freedom of speech. So which one is it?”

 

So it needs to be contested. They’ve overstretched, overreached! And we’re going to catch them lacking. I think there’s a very strong chance we’re going to catch them lacking when it goes before the High Court, and they’re shitting themselves at the moment and they don’t know exactly what to do. And the people that are responsible for this fumble and this mistake, they’re just going to be removed from office. And a bunch of new faces that haven’t made mistakes yet are going to be put in place. And that’s a Band Aid issue that the system always has.

 

But multifaceted. And again, media is another important wing of any political organisation. That’s something that the Right-wing in Germany did very, very well. Right-wing the nationalists in Germany did very well in the late Weimar years, was they had a huge amount of Right-wing media. Now in Australia, all we really have, well, what we have on our side, there’s a great independent media company called The Noticer which does a very objective and fine job at stating the facts. And that is absolutely, … I see grandmas and grandpas, even see Leftists sharing articles from The Noticer. And that’s a great alternative media platform to what we call “Sky Jews” or Sky News. So I’m sure you’ve got Sky News as well in Britain it’s like in Australia it’s like our equivalent of Fox News. I think three quarters or over three quarters of the presenters are Zionists. The whole platform is a Zionist platform.

 

But I think three quarters are actually jewish Zionists and the rest are non-jewish Zionists. And it’s an absolutely horrible and disgusting platform that has maybe 10% at best, fair and reasonable people on it. I think 10%, maybe 20% of the guys on that platform actually care about Australia. They just unfortunately have to also care about Israel in order to care about Australia at the same time.

 

But that is a genuinely horrible platform outside of those, that sort of 10%. And that is a dangerous situation where the Right-wing is reliant on one singular news platform to try to get any sort of fair take in their favour because they’re always going to attack us because it’s a complete, you know, Zionist operation to control the Right-wing. So media would be just as important as your lawfare, as your legal lobby.

 

Whereas what I get asked by a lot of the older guys is:

 

“Where is the ADL for White people? You know, where’s the Anti-Defamation League for White people? Where’s the White lobby?”

 

And I think that is absolutely! And I know that one of your colleagues, is it Kate? Kate is trying to build A White lobby, I believe at the moment in England?

 

[56:55]

 

 

Mark Collett: We work with a group called the Workers of England, Union. So they have actually set up a trade union and that’s who we sort of ally with because they’ve actually got qualified legal experts, which is what you need to win these cases. And we partner with them to help promote a genuine trade union that stands up for workers.

 

And obviously a trade union has to be all encompassing. It can’t discriminate on the basis of race. So anyone can join the Workers of England, Union. But the Workers of England, Union is the only union in the country that will defend nationalists who are sacked for speaking their mind.

 

And this year we’ve already had some massive wins doing that. And we work with a solicitor called Robin Tilbrook, who runs a political party called the English Democrats. And he is the only solicitor in the country that has used civil law to actually, because he’s a practicing solicit, so he can go to court to sue the leaders of the grooming gangs to get civil compensation for the victims. Because what happens in this country, which this might shock you with, the grooming gangs, they get very, very short sentences and they might be forced to pay a couple of thousand pounds in compensation.

 

But most of these men are actually quite wealthy. They own their own businesses, they own property and their wealth is tied up in lots of different assets that can be seized. Well, Robin Tilbrook actually used the civil court to take a convicted grooming gang leader who had already been found guilty in the criminal court through the civil court system and they got a massive compensation package.

 

So what we’re actually hoping to do is roll out a system whereby as soon as these grooming gang leaders are released from prison, we immediately take them to court, civil court, and seize their houses. Because in their community, going to jail actually doesn’t shame them. Their community stands by them. But when they lose their wealth and their house, that does shame them. And it hits them a lot harder because most people can stand four or five years in jail. Most people can’t stand losing a 500,000 pound house. You know, that affects the entire family. So we do have legal advocacy and we do it with those groups.

 

Now, there is one question I wanted to ask you briefly because we’re going to the second hour now. We’re going to do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet, but you’d like to contribute to my work on the show, please consider doing so.

 

But one thing I was going to ask you is, I don’t know if you saw it. But I did a review of the recent documentary on NSN. I did it here on Odysee. I watched the full thing live and gave commentary on it. And I’ve got to say it was one of the most blatant and disingenuous hit pieces I’ve ever seen!

 

So even in the UK, the hit pieces aren’t as bad as that because the whole thing built up to like some kind of terrorist attack and then the terrorists ended up being Muslims or blacks [chuckling] and it was nothing to do with you. They obviously using that or try to use that show to bring in new laws or new legislation to potentially harm you. Is that something you worry about in the future? The media colluding with the state to actually bring in some kind of legislation that would outright stop you advocating in the way that you are?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s not a new concern of mine because it’s been happening since day one. If you are familiar or remember that I was imprisoned without trial for seven months before giving bail and having a whole series, I think 12 out of 13 charges were dropped and I was released from prison. That occurred in 2021 during the Covid lockdowns.

 

And when I tried to get full disclosure from the prosecution, which is what it’s called here in Australia, I’m sure it’s called something similar in Britain. Full disclosure. Is that correct, Mark? Yeah.

 

So when we try to get full disclosure for the defense, …

 

Mark Collett: It’s just called disclosure. In the UK, they have to give you every bit of evidence that supports your case as well, even if it undermines their case. And just as a funny aside, when they took me to jail, I made a claim that we had information that Muslims had guns in mosques in Bradford.

 

And when I got my disclosure bundle, there was actually a redacted piece showing that the police actually did have information that Muslims had guns in mosques in Bradford.

 

So yeah, we do have disclosure.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So when my lawyers organised full disclosure from the police, there was actually a bar on that. There was a ban on that full disclosure and, or a stop, a hold, I don’t know what the exact term was called.

 

But they went to a higher court and they did something called public interest immunity, which basically is like:

 

“This is a state secret. It’s against the public’s interest to know this state secret. And therefore Mr. Sewell and the defense can’t have full disclosure.”

 

And we got this very small, very thin, maybe not even/4 disclosure. I don’t even think we got 1/4 of what we asked for in the disclosure. And they sent three King’s Councils to the Higher Court, not the High Court, but to the, I think it was the county. And they sent three Kings Councils. And can you guess who the three Kings Councils represented? One the police, the prosecutor, one the Attorney General, which is ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation], the government, and one, Channel Nine, the news.

 

Now why would Channel Nine be sending a King’s Council to a serious court of law in Australia to ban Thomas Sewell from getting full disclosure to defend against false allegations, if they’re not in collusion already? Why would Channel Nine, AISO and Victoria Police both send three lawyers, one lawyer each? Why would three of them come to court together to say to a county court judge:

 

“We don’t think Thomas Sewell should have the information he needs to defend himself because it’s against the public’s interest?”

 

[1:03:34]

 

So it’s not a new concern of mine. I’ve known from day one that these, a lot of these media companies are embedded with ASIO operatives. And ASIO has admitted that themselves. ASIO just doesn’t give a fuck, clearly. And when they’ve been in Senate inquiries, The head of ASIO, Mike Burgess, which is equivalent to your MI5 has said that:

 

“We have journalists in our employment.”

 

I mean that’s a pretty stupid thing to say, don’t you think? And we all know how the American system works with the majority of journalists are CIA or ex-CIA in America. So likewise I’m sure Britain and Australia is no different. They’re either CIA, sorry, they’re either intelligence operatives, or they are Left-wing communists. And it’s usually pretty easy to tell which one is which because one always supports Israel and the other doesn’t support Israel. And that’s how you can tell which ones are communists and which ones are intelligence operatives.

 

So that’s what we deal with globally or especially in the Anglo-sphere.

 

But I don’t think Russia or Ukraine would be any different. Or Poland or Hungary. I’m pretty sure they’ve got the same problem.

 

And yeah, I’m not concerned about them passing any laws to ban us because we have survived like three major Senate inquiries. We get raised at the Senate Question Time all the time. Mike Burgess, the leader, the head of ASIO has to be rolled out every time questions are asked about us and he has to sit there and roll his eyes and look at his deputies and say:

 

“Well you know, they’re awful people. But they’re currently not breaking the law and I’m not making any recommendations to have them listed as a terror group.”

 

And he has to unfortunately do that about four times a year for the past sort of yeah. Ridiculous number of these inquiries. So even he’s getting bored of them. Even I’m getting boredom. I don’t even watch him anymore. I just get the highlight reel now because they usually go for three hours at least, sometimes more, sometimes six hours. I used to watch it start to finish, stressing out:

 

“Oh, oh, God! Are we gonna get., …”

You know what I mean? The word you don’t want me to say on stream. But are we going to get [word unclear] and become political prisoners and am I doing 10 years in jail and getting some peace and quiet so I can write a book, or five?

 

But now I don’t really stress about it at all because we’re just, it would take a radical, it would take a few things. It would take a number of things. But that hit piece that they did on us was really just low energy. It was the worst one they’ve ever done. What was it called, Leaving Hate?

 

Mark Collett: Radicalised, wasn’t it? That was the name.

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay, well, maybe it was called that, but I saw it advertised as Leaving Hate. I’m pretty sure it was the ABC, which is the Australian.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, just let me just look it up. I had the, it’s on my Odysee.

 

Anyway, what was it actually called? Because I actually used the graphic from their own, let me see if I can find it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s not super crucial, but yeah, …

 

Mark Collett: It was called Radicalised. Well, that was the name on the graphic that they produced.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, okay. Yeah.

 

So I think that that was the lowest effort that they’ve ever done. They’ve never made an attack on us. So low energy.

 

And obviously their strategy was very lazy and improper. And I don’t think it really convinced anyone but the lowest end of the bell curve in terms of political perception, which we’re not really going to be gaining their support anytime soon either.

 

But anyone that was perceptive and actually paid attention while watching it, even to the smallest degree while they’re doing their nightly routine of having dinner or whenever it was on television. They would see that. Okay, what are they talking about? Okay, a 17 or 18 year old joined the Org. The mother’s upset that he joined the Org. She freaked out and contacted the media because apparently I’m kidnapping her son by having him come to our boxing training voluntarily. And then try to conflate that with several non-Whites that went and committed terror attacks and one White autistic teenager that was groomed by a mosque into committing a terror attack. And then went back to talking about us. So, it’s called a “shit sandwich” and we were the bread! And you know, Islamic terror was shit the in the middle. And they were trying to conflate us with them.

 

And I don’t think it was effective. I think it was lazy. I was expecting it to be way worse! But maybe our OPSEC’s [Operational Security] a little bit better now. And we caught a journalist a little bit before that and he turned out to be a gay meth addict. And he just promoted us. He just wrote articles about how we’ve got blonde White baby makers and you know, we’ve got a fertility model and you know, we’re having lots of babies and we’re encouraging women to be Trad. And you know, and this was written by a guy that’s written articles in the past about going over to Thailand and having sex with little boys for $12. So these are our enemies? Yeah, I think we’re doing pretty well, to be honest. I don’t think anyone. They’re just so out of touch!

 

I mean, how can a gay meth addict criticise, … In what world does a gay meth addict have any right to criticise a bunch of wholesome, normal Chungus White people that are having babies, having families and dancing around a maypole? I mean, they just put all of our wholesome Chungus best optics up and then put dark gloomy music on. And they interviewed, I think two gay brothers from one of the wives. I think one of the wives in the Org has.

 

[1:09:42]

 

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, those two freaks were absolutely reprehensible! I mean, they were talking about like the way to bring up children. I actually said:

 

“There’s no way to let them [chuckling] anywhere near my children!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, and this just shows the complete out of touchness of the regime.

 

And as I’ve always said, Mark, it’s about heightening the contradictions. And sometimes these people do our job for us because it’s actually our job to hide in the contradictions, not theirs. It’s their job to muddy the waters. But they made it really clear that we’re nice, wholesome White people having blond and babies. And the people that don’t like that are pink haired freaks with shit in their face that suck dick every second night on Grindr.

 

So it’s not looking good for them. They’re not sending their best. They’re not really thinking this through. You know, these aren’t your grandfather’s jews is the expression that I heard from some, one of the senior members. These aren’t your grandfather’s jews! These are privileged, very, very privileged, lazy jews and non-Whites. This is DEI [Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion/DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity] hit pieces.

 

I mean, this is the DEI. It was like a Sri Lankan chick that was obviously organising it. We’re currently in communication with the Channel 7 journalist. Channel 7 is not a very good reputable company either. It is better than the ABC and it’s definitely better than Channel Nine.

 

Now this guy again, I’m, you know, no spring chicken to this. You know, I’m sure a lot of people will be like:

 

“Thomas, be careful! Thomas, you have to be really careful. Thomas, I don’t know if you know this, but journalists are sneaky. Thomas, be careful!”

 

So just everyone in the comments section that’s about to say this, just hold your tongue, all right? This is not my first rodeo, okay? I’ve done this a few times now. I’m actually kind of sharp and I know how to wield the sword of truth. So just don’t stress so much! The hysteria that’s going to come from this line.

 

But there’s a journalist at the moment that wants to do an insider documentary on us. He wants to do it properly, unlike what these people done where they’ve kind of done a hit piece without our permission and not even give us, you know, 15 seconds to defend ourselves. And now will he succeed in his operation in terms of passing through the editor stage? Probably not. And if it does, it’ll be edited to hell, of course.

 

But we’re going to show them what we do as an organisation. We’re going to give this guy an insight into the plan, not necessarily the planning, but we’ll probably larp some planning. We don’t want to give away what we’re doing before we’re doing it, but we’ll let him film our activism. We’ll let him film some of the training that we do. And you know, he asked if he can film like some political meetings and so, you know, we’re working out a way of doing that without having guys doxxed and just giving them a little bit of an open insight thing.

 

We are building our own documentary as well at the moment. It’s a very important thing to show the public and show people what you actually doing with your organisation so that they have an insider take so that it’s not all just doom and gloom music on the ABC.

 

But yeah, we’re working on those two projects at the moment with this channel, Channel 7 journalist and obviously with our own internal one which we need a lot of work and a lot of practice to pump that out.

 

And yeah, I think that one. I’m actually quite excited for my next meeting with this Channel 7 guy because he kind of got a bit famous during the Covid situation for being one of the only journalists that was actually against the lockdowns and against the Covid issues. And he actually lost his job at Channel 7 because of that. And he’s since been rehired and I think he’ll give us the fairest go we could possibly get and you know, we’ll put on a little spectacle and show people what we are.

 

But obviously long term, it’s not the solution long term. We need to produce all of our own media ourselves. But it would be an interesting way of working with the, I mean they’re going to do a hit piece on us anyway. So I’ve got nothing to hide. Truth fears, no investigation.

 

So it would be better to sit down and have the interviews with them. The most likely scenario is, I don’t know if you remember when I did the interview with Todd Sampson from Channel 10. Todd Sampson, he’s quite famous. I think he’s Canadian, but he’s quite famous in Canada and in Australia. He’s kind of like a Louis Thoreau. He’s like a 40 cent Louis Thoreau. He’s not as famous as Louis Thoreau. You’ve been interviewed by Louis Thoreau, haven’t you?

 

[1:14:08]

 

Mark Collett: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, you haven’t?

 

Mark Collett: He reached out to my organisation at one point wanting to do like a weird weekend, but we said no. Yeah, like he comes along and he sort of, … We have to do the Superchats in a minute. But he comes along and does the whole like:

 

“Well, we’re gonna make you look like you’re, …”

 

He comes along and sort of makes friends with you but then makes you out that you’re the weirdest people that he’s spent time with. And he’s done it with Right-wingers before. He’s done it with some American groups and I’m kind of sceptical about doing things like that. We tend to shy away from the fly on the wall documentaries to be honest.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, different horses for different courses. I think we did really well. We got a lot of really good feedback, Blair and I, from the public for our interview with Sam Newman, who is a huge talking head here in Australia. He is probably one of the most influential talking heads before he got kicked off the mainstream news for being too anti-woke so to speak. And he is one of the biggest, he was one of the biggest and most influential characters in Australian media. And we went on his podcast and obviously you would have seen that. And for some reason he had a hard on for Blair in a bad way.

 

And apparently I was the most reasonable person he’s ever met from this side of politics, which [chuckling] I thought was kind of bizarre because I’m pretty extreme. Blair was kind of the moderating factor and for some reason Sam saw it the other way around.

 

But either way I think that was really effective because it was a sit down for 40 minutes or 50 minutes and ideas could be properly fleshed out.

 

And a lot of older people that have watched Sam Newman for 20, 30 years were saying to me that they’ve never actually, because they don’t watch these kind of shows, they don’t watch a Mark Collett Tom Sewell podcast. They don’t watch a Joel Davis Blair Cottrell podcast. But they will watch Sam Newman. They’ll sit down for 40 minutes and watch Sam Newman waffle on about something.

 

And so they’d actually only ever seen the media’s perception of us in those little 15 second segments on the news. They’ve never actually seen us be sit down before and interviewed for any extended period of time. And they were quite surprised. And these are people that aren’t supporters of the Org. They were very surprised at how much they agreed with basically everything that we had to say except maybe they’re not as historically literate, like Sam isn’t, on Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, which we don’t need to get into.

 

And likewise, I think with this Channel 7 interview, we will get a chance to show people what we actually are, what we actually do and that we’re a completely voluntary organisation. And try to fight back against this nonsense that giving young White men a system of values and giving young White men a new way of behaving that they haven’t been exposed to before within the faggot education system, and that there are actually positive male role models in society. You will just find that they’re all on the Right or they’re all in the pro-White scene. Because they’re the only people that actually care about a future for our people.

 

And to do that, we need to rebuild man and woman as the building block of society. And man and woman is fundamentally sick within liberal democracy and our political views. The root of them is to rebuild man as a new archetype and to rebuild woman as a new archetype. And we have had a lot of people reach out to us, not just in the media, but within people that have left mainstream political parties. And the thing that they’re most amazed and sort of surprised about us as a political identity is our obsession, as they call it, with physical fitness. They find that they actually like it. It’s shocking to them, but they’re amazed by it in the sense that they’ve never seen so many people come together with a political idea but engage in physical activity.

 

And they said to us, I’ve had one guy recently who was a someone, I won’t say who and where, but someone deep within the system that’s leaving the system and seeking out to help people like us, not necessarily overthrow the system, but certainly surpass it. And he was saying that:

 

“The reason why the Liberal Party is so afraid of you guys is because you guys can get more people to a boxing session with a political identity attached to it than they can to a political meeting! And that scares the hell out of them because they can’t even get people to sit in a seat and listen. And you guys are getting them to run 10 kilometers. That’s impressive!”

 

“And that’s why they’re freaking out. And they don’t know how to treat you guys. They don’t know how to deal with you guys because of the sheer tenacity and mental fortitude and strength that you guys have!”

 

Just the vitality of the whole culture, the political culture we’re building. So we are building a new archetype of man and a new archetype of women. Most of our women, not all, but most of our women have little side hobbies that they help out the movement with. They’re not just all just barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen, although a whole bunch of them are a lot of the time of the year.

 

But they also have hobbies. They make trinkets, they do little art projects, they do things that they want to do. They’re not, a lot of them aren’t going to work. There’s very few women in our community that go to work. But it’s not frowned upon. They can, of course, if they want to learn skills and do certain things. But you know, everyone knows what the priority is and it’s focusing, if you can afford it, on having, which I think everyone can. It’s just about taking a hit to the standard of living without a dual income. I think everyone can do it. It’s just what you prioritize. A certain standard of living, or six children. Me. It’s obvious and I think with a lot of women in our scene, it’s obvious.

 

[1:19:55]

 

But yeah, they’re shocked at that because the Liberal Party and the Labour Party, they’re trying to turn women into prime ministers! And they’ve got all these staffers and they’ve got this culture within Parliament where they’re hiring gay prostitutes and you know, raping each other in Parliament, and then they’re complaining on the Australian Broadcasting Company that we’re, we’ve got women dancing around the maypole holding babies and pregnant!

 

And it’s like:

 

“Wow, that’s a bit of a contradiction, isn’t it?”

 

The evil outsiders are having little nice community festivals on Midsummer, which was near Christmas, three days before Christmas. And doing these little cute little kind of European, Aryan, Anglo centric community days, while Parliament, they’re having gay orgies! It’s a little bit different, isn’t it? So who will triumph in the end, who will triumph? Yeah, the Righteous or the evil?

 

Yeah, let’s just do some of these Superchats.

 

Mark Collett: Let’s do these Superchats and then we’ll see who triumphs! ItsOkToBeANationalist gave 14.88. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Thomas, are there billions of Indians attending their weird water purifying ceremony in heaven?”

 

I don’t know what that means, but.

 

Thomas Sewell: Short context, I said on stream that one way of looking at politics is not as a political identity, but as a near religious identity. And that whether you’re Christian or whether you’re pagan or whether you’re agnostic, the idea of heaven is something that you can fathom the idea of a future some point in the eternal and the ethereal, where you go after your life or where your children go after your life, that’s something that I think most people can imagine and can have a creative concept of, and a political idea is quite simple, but it can be subject to change. Whereas an idea of heaven is quite eternal. It’s not really subject to change.

 

And so the conversation was not, are there going to be millions of Indians in Australia? But are there going to be millions of Indians in heaven? And the water purification ceremony is some Hindu ritual where I think 450 million Hindus came to this one river and just sludged the whole river out. And there was a video of it that went viral on Twitter of the world’s biggest religious meeting.

 

And what I asked was:

 

“Is this in heaven? Do you see this in heaven? Like in your vision of heaven, does this concept exist?”

 

And the answer is, of course, no. And I preface that with, are there birds in heaven. Are there bees in heaven? Of course. Are there 450 million Indians doing a water purification ceremony in your version of heaven? That’s the question people should ask themselves and then that can help them. Perhaps, …

 

Mark Collett: Probably not.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So are they grooming gangs in heaven? No! So why are they grooming gangs here? Well, clearly we’re not in heaven yet, so we should be working towards that, shouldn’t we? We should be working towards a better afterlife for ourselves and our children.

 

And so we got to solve these problems in a number of ways, including the political.

 

Mark Collett: Indeed. DerCherusker gave $5. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Good episode and powerful takes.”

 

Thank you very much. Stan 1 gave, $25. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Great show, great guest here in Britain. We recently had a former government advisor stating that a future civil war is a real possibility. Is that the same possibility for Australia? And will the dystopia of Mad Max become a real scenario?”

 

Thomas Sewell: I wouldn’t go as far as Mad Max, but it’s certainly a prophetic idea with the fuel shortages that we’re going to have incorporated with the space and distance between living communities in Australia. But yes, absolutely! I mean Mark’s already concerned where I’m going with this question, so I’ll behave.

 

But yeah, obviously it’s not our fault. Obviously it’s not White nationalism that’s going to cause a civil war. It’s liberal democracy! Liberal democracy is continuing to lump non-integrable people that hate each other just as much as they hate us in a lot of cases, liberal democracy is lumping all of these people together, and it’s a recipe for disaster! And our goal is to actually prevent that disaster.

 

There’s obviously a lot of people that are preparing for it, but we need to prevent it. There needs to be a concerted effort, a strong effort to prevent that from happening. And the only rational way to prevent civil war is mass deportations! Because otherwise, I mean, look at the Middle East. Look at what happens when you lump a whole bunch of different ethnicities. They’re actually pretty similar to each other in one space. Sectarian violence is the result of all these vastly different communities on a long enough timeline. Because that’s the, … Yeah, I’ll leave it there Mark. How does that sound? I don’t want to get too deep on that question, do I?

 

[1:25:09]

 

Mark Collett: I want to say this. I’m just gonna say this. This was actually on a podcast. There’s this woman, and I’ve just looked it up, so I get the name right. She’s a British journalist called Louise Perry, and she does this podcast called Maiden, Mother, Matriarch. And she’s got less than 30,000 subscribers on YouTube, so significantly less popular than I was when I was on there. This podcast she’s done has blown up, and the podcast is called The Coming Civil War.

 

Now, I find this really interesting because I’m looking up this Louise Perry, and I think she’s obviously somebody who’s got some sort of influence in the system. And I kind of get really suspicious when you have a woman like that, some female journalists, she’s allowed on YouTube, and she starts talking about civil war, about the breakdown of society, how this is all going to be on racial lines.

 

Now, I know that if I did a podcast saying:

 

“Look, society is going to break down, there’s going to be a civil war on racial lines, and this is the end!”

 

I’d get my door kicked through within a couple of days. And I kind of look at people doing things like that. And then I see people who were arrested after the Southport incidents who did, who’ve said far less than that, who just said:

 

“Look, you know, problems are coming to a town near you!”

 

And they ended up serving two, three weeks in jail for just saying problems coming to a town near you.

 

And then there’s this journalist with some government advisor, like doing Fed Post Central!

 

And I kind of wonder what their game is because after being around as long as I have, I always smell a rat when people who are so involved in the system come out and are allowed to do a YouTube video that by any other standard would be an instant ban and a knock on the door. So probably beware of that weird Louise Perry. That’s my advice.

 

Great Works gave a hundred dollars. Thank you so much for your generosity. Said:

 

“Thank you, Mark, for networking between nationalists and the Commonwealth. I think the UK may fall, but we’ll still all in this together. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Ireland, and the US to a lesser extent. In my opinion. The US is so opposed to us ideologically, it will always oppose Commonwealth unity.”

 

Look, I love people from Australia, New Zealand. I like people from the U.S. I think the thing is, one thing I’ve always tried to foster throughout my sort of 300 episodes of PWR and 100 episodes of This Week on the Alt-Right is getting people from all over the White world to work together. Because this nonsense that because there’s been ethnic rivalries in the past, there should be ethnic rivalries now is just divisive. Because every single group of White people, wherever they are in the world, whether they’re indigenous or whether they’re settlers who built a proud nation, we all face the same problem.

 

So if we don’t stand together, we’ll all be screwed separately! That’s how I see it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

Mark Collett: Anyway, Ben gave $3, thank you so much, and said:

 

“Hello Thomas, to touch on what you said in the issue of Left versus Right, do you think that the association of far-Right politics with anti-female sentiment is harmful to White nationalism in terms of attracting young White women to the movement? Anti-Whites seem to have got a grip on that demographic.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I would argue that politics is polarizing everywhere, that it’s polarizing for young men, it’s polar polarizing for young women.

 

And so we are living in a society where toxic femininity is never called out, not once! No one is doing it. And the only people, sorry, no one is doing it that’s a reasonable person. The only people that are doing it are these kind of online mulatto pimps. And that’s not good that they can control that sentiment. So because it is a genuine sentiment, there is a genuinely toxic behaviour in both young men and young women. Now all the potentially toxic behaviour in young men that’s being called out usually isn’t actually toxic behaviour. It’s traditional behaviour. Traditional notions of masculinity are the healthy and normal ones and they’ve been conflated as being toxic.

 

Obviously there are some improper and impious behaviours that maybe not so much traditional, but maybe archaic that are called out from time to time. And I don’t usually engage too much in that, in calling that stuff out. But what I have done in the past is I’ve been honest enough. One out of every 365 takes, is to call out certain types of female behaviour.

 

And what I’ve noticed is that that is a fixation point for some people to argue that the entire Right-wing or far-Right or White national scene is now going to fail because now we’ve alienated women as a whole because one or two or three behaviours have potentially been called out. And second to that, the idea that I’m not a human being and I’m not allowed personal preferences, that I’m your spokesperson, I’m your slave, and I’m beholden to only hold opinions that you agree with, and that I can’t have my personal tastes in this world, I can’t be an individual, I’m not entitled to any sort of individuality, which makes me a character. That makes me more than just a political spokesperson, I find personally reprehensible because no one’s holding anyone else to that account.

 

So that’s my statement about that. I don’t think that we’re losing the female population. I think that liberal democracy is losing the female population. And I think liberal democracy is destroying the White female population.

 

And we shouldn’t be looking at gender or class war. I am a National Socialist and I believe in what Adolf Hitler believes, which is that we need class marriage and that we need marriage between men and women, that we need a marriage of the sexes where men and women are working together for a collective future. Now part of working together is having those difficult and uncomfortable conversations with each other. Women have absolutely no shortage of complaints about male behaviour. They’ve got an infinite list! But every now and then men have some small concerns with female behaviour where there needs to be a course correction.

 

[1:31:29]

 

And I think we attract a lot of women to the scene that in the past we hadn’t in terms of this was a very, almost entirely male dominated space. I go on Twitter now and I see just as many women using our talking points, even anti-feminist talking points, as there are men. And I don’t think that these are just groupies and girls that are jumping on the bandwagon because it’s a celebrity scene. I think that the average girl that is polarised into our politics is aware that there’s too much toxic female behaviour. And it’s part of the reason and part of taking responsibility. So men and women both need to share that responsibility. Obviously, more is always going to be expected of the men and for the hypothetical, let’s say, so it should be that way.

 

But, yeah, I do notice that, I mean, certain people call them “wife guys”. I obviously have used a different term in the past which has caused controversy because it shouldn’t be a controversial term. But I do warn all the time against a culture of submissive men! I do warn all the time against a culture where men politically aren’t trusting their instincts and instead are resting their judgement, on the feelings and opinions of their partners, of their women or of just random women on the Internet, which is even worse! And we do have to work together. We do have to lean on each other’s instincts to an extent, but men need to assert their instincts!

 

So I can go into more depth if they want, but I think that that covers the question quite coherently.

 

Mark Collett: It certainly does. It Was Made Up gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Your banners are awesome! Destroy Pedo Freaks is possibly the greatest banner of all time!”

 

Thank you so much! I agree. It’s a good banner.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll quickly respond to that. I think the secret to banners is somewhere between two to four words. I think between two to four words. And it has to be as aggressive as possible, within the law. I think a successful banner is right up until that point where that line is. And it really hits hard! It’s a force multiplier. I think that if you have a kind of, … Obviously different horses for different courses. But I think the success of that banner came from the fact that it was just three words. It was just sharp. It was revolutionary. And there’s no compromise in the message. It was just pure. It was beautiful. It was keener.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. Jagdeep Jano gave $15. Thanks so much:

 

“Hey, both. Question for you, Tom. You spoke about how Keith Woods recently had his cringe-worthy private messages leaked by a former adult worker who’s now a groiper named Slayter. Could you give your take on this and psychoanalyze Keith? Why was he attracted to her? Are men really that desperate?”

 

Well, I’m going to Google this Slayter to see whether she’s attractive enough for a DM.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not sure if you’ll find anything on Google. I think the account was called SlayterHaus on Twitter. It’s probably still on Twitter. And I had people reach out and say, this is a fed operation. I don’t think so. I think it’s just a mentally ill former prostitute or prostitute.

 

Mark Collett: Very strange looking, isn’t she?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, definitely some sort of blood dilution in there.

 

But, yeah, I did make a comment and I didn’t attack Keith. I didn’t feel the need to dogpile, …

 

Mark Collett: Too many tattoos! She’s literally covered. She’s got more tattoos than my ex. She’s literally covered in tattoos! Like, there isn’t like a spare bit of skin, is there?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, which is not a not a good look. Not a very good look.

 

Mark Collett: She’s go a Breaking Bad tattoo on her leg.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes. That also made the meme rounds. Look at the end of the day, …

 

Mark Collett: She likes Nick Fuentes, though.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, she fits in with that crowd, doesn’t she?

 

Mark Collett: Do you know what’s odd about her? Like, I mean, if he’d had maybe quite a lot of alcohol and she sort of came up to you when you were pretty inebriated, I’m sure that you could be persuaded. But the issue is this. I never thought that would be Keith’s type. Keith is such a sort of an intelligent, erudite, charming young man. I didn’t think that would be Keith’s sort of thing. Keith! Who are you? Do we even know the real Keith?

 

Thomas Sewell: I would have expected a, like a shorter kind of goth girl. Maybe that’s what, if I was running a government honeypot operation, I would have sent. I would have lined up all the goth e-girls and I would have been like:

 

“We’ve got a mission. We’re going after the Keith!”

 

And I would have picked out the archetype of a certain type of goth girl.

 

But yeah, I think, like, what I said on stream, in brief, was that he didn’t really do anything wrong. He didn’t really do anything that bad. Like, obviously there’s a little bit of cringe there. But look, if that’s the worst that they could get. It’s not really that bad. She’s obviously. Yeah, I mean, look at it. It’s a problem.

 

[1:37:16]

 

But what I said on stream was that she presented as a snake. And yeah, she presented as a snake. That’s a snake. And when you have a snake telling you that:

 

“This is me, I am a snake, look at me!”

 

And you confide in them, because she messaged probably two dozen public faces. She messaged me asking me for advice on how to find a man. And I told her to stop being a slut! She messaged Jacob, same shit! She messaged Keith. She probably messaged, I mean, a whole range of people. I think she messaged Joel. Joe blocked her straight away because we told him like this bitch is crazy! And we started just blocking her.

 

You know, obviously, as a public figure, you get DMs all the time. You get e-girls and DMs all the time. And most of them you just block. And some of them are just amicable and you can just answer their question and they might not ever message you again or they might try to help you in some way. They might have some sort of they might give some sort of advice or not necessarily advice. It’s probably not the best way to put it. But in this case, obviously you have someone that’s very clearly mentally ill. And, it’s just sad that out of all the people that she messaged, the one person that was actually nice to her, and this is my take, this is what I said on stream. The one person that was nice to her, she betrayed! You know, it’s just evil. Like, it’s just a fundamentally evil creature!

 

Like, Keith didn’t do anything.

 

Mark Collett: No, no, no! He’s a single guy.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he’s a single man and he’s being entertained by a woman that is really just a an adult entertainer. And he didn’t do anything silly. He didn’t send any nudes to her. Like, there’s way worse scandals than what Keith’s done.

 

And yeah, obviously they just dogpiled him because they use that as an opportunity to attack the personal, when obviously Joel did a really good job at attacking the political. You know, him and Joel had a great discourse recently about nationalism versus National Socialism. And the e-Girl is just a side quest drama that takes away from the political mission. And Keith’s done a very good job at handling it and just putting his head down and just focusing on the mission. And that’s what all of us should do, regardless of distractions.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, look, I got to say this. Keith’s a really nice guy.

 

Thomas Sewell: Should be used as motivation for everyone.

 

Mark Collett: To be honest, like Keith’s far too good for her. So look, Keith, if you need some brotherly advice, come to big Mark. I’ll help you out! Number one, bit of advice, don’t go for a girl like that. I’ll give you the rest off stream.

 

The Resident Baker gave 14.88. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great show, Mark. Very pleased to finally see you and Tom in the discussion. Does Tom have an update on Stephen Wells? Also, congratulations to Tom and the recent birth of his second child.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Thank you for that. The update on Stephen Wells is he’s still fighting the principle. He’s an absolute legend! He’s a Martyr for the cause. No one’s putting it up him up for it, he’s just doing it himself. He just, he wants to argue the principle that he shouldn’t be punished with bail conditions for wearing a hat and sunglasses in public. That’s absolutely an injustice! And he’s going all the way with it and wants to prove a point. I do have some messages that I haven’t responded to that have come into my inbox over the last, 24 hours or 48 hours regarding an update on him.

 

But yeah, we’re just trying to get a bail amendment so that he can be not in prison and also not punished outside of prison for wearing a hat and sunglasses. About a third of the charges for the, I think there was about 34 court cases over the fortnight. I think 16 non-Victorians that, sorry, non-South Australians that had gone to South Australia, and I think almost 18, I think 18 South Australians were charged prior to.

 

So the media made a big argument saying that:

 

“Oh no South Australians were charged, there was all just these outsiders.”

 

But that’s because they charged 18 guys the week before the rally to have them on bail conditions to stop them from going to the rally. So they actually charged more South Australians than they did. And there was one random member of the public from South Australia that was charged as well.

 

So I think there was 19 South Australians and 15 from outside of South Australia. And yeah, about a third of those charges have already been dropped and it seems to be at random. There seems to be no system to why some people have had loitering dropped and some people are still fighting loitering and some people have had article of disguise dropped and others are still fighting article of disguise. And the symbols charge is going to have to be fought in the High Court, because we have the right to political communication, gestures, symbols, signs. So this is a High Court thing, this is a constitutional matter, can’t be fought at magistrates.

 

And so if we don’t get a bail amendment for Stephen Wells, he’s going to be in there for a very long time. Which I’m not 100 sure how he’s going. I do know that he has had some phone calls with the guys, but he’s getting tortured like we all were in solitary confinement. He’s getting tortured. So nothing new under the sun in that regard. He’s in solitary confinement being tortured.

 

And that’s what they do to political prisoners here in Australia. That’s what they did to the 16 of us for three days, locked in cells with the light on for three days straight and fed two sausage rolls a day and a glass of water.

 

So, and I actually had the privilege this time of having a Jeremy Clarkson book which was pretty funny, a Top Gear book which was just a series of articles where he’s calling people Trotskyites and communists and mentioning Hitler every third article, which I thought was pretty funny.

 

[1:43:19]

 

 

But yeah, that book was actually pretty horrible. So I almost would have preferred a religious book. But this is what they do. This is what they do. This is the system. This is what you have to consider when you go down this path. But it only makes you stronger. And Stephen Wells is a very intelligent man and he’s a very strong, spirited man and he’s going to take a while to recover from what he’s going through.

 

I know for me personally, spending that much time in solitary confinement, it takes you a long time to get your head. You have to spend a lot of time in nature and staring at trees for extended periods of time, because you haven’t seen anything alive for so long. It’s a fascinating experience to see something living and just work out a way of moving on with your life and getting back into being politically effective. And yeah, he’s a very strong willed man.

 

So they’ve just radicalised the entire public against the system. For locking up a man on Australia Day, for celebrating Australia Day. And he kind of just looked at me and it was like something out of Batman. What is it? The Dark Knight Rises. And he kind of just looked at me and I just had this psychic, the psychic feeling. And he was just saying:

 

“They expect one of us in the wreckage, brother.”

 

And that’s kind of, yeah, he’s tough as nails. So it does feel, it does feel, it’s sad, it does feel a bit sad.

 

But look, there is no victory without sacrifice. And he understands that. We all understand that in our organisation. Sometimes the sacrifice is very small. Sometimes the sacrifice is very great. And we need to remember that there are men on in other countries that have died, that have died. There’s many men that have died for things even less important than this. And many men that have died for how important this is so it is horrible. Anyone that has experience in solitary confinement will know that it is torture. It is a method of torture. So our strength goes out to him. He needs it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! ThinRedLine gave $14. Thanks so much. Said:

 

“Qu came very late and will have to watch the replay.”

 

Thank you so much! DerCherusker he gave another $5. Thank you very much. Said:

 

“Think a thousand times before taking a decision. But after taking a decision, never turn back. Even if you get a thousand difficulties. Keep on fighting comrades.”

 

Thank you very much. 1488 came from pure Nomad. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“So happy with PWR with Sewell finally happened. Being busy at work so we’ll catch up on it tomorrow.”

 

Thank you very much. Stasniki4 okay $6. Thank you very much. She said:

 

“Hi Mark and Thomas, over the years you both become very dedicated, fierce advocates of White well-being communities in both the UK and Australia. In your own words, what does it mean to protect the bio-spirit of the West? Also, please stop hating jews and focus on yourself. Thank you so much! Heroes Prometheus Rising.”

 

You don’t have to answer that was obviously a troll comment to try and get some heat between me and Jason No White guilt which we’re not going to go down that road. Wizard gave $15. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Love to the Aussies leading the way.”

 

Thank you so much! Point gave $25, thank you very much and said:

 

“Donation.”

 

Aunt Sally gave $5. Thank you so much my dear. She said:

 

“Thank you Mark and Thomas.”

 

Blade man gave $3. Thank you very much. Said:

 

“Hail Mark. Hail Tom!”

 

Jay Bradley gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Hey Mark and Tom, just want to say full respect to Tom and Joel and the boys there. Method is the only way to go. Patriot Front are on the Right track too. Nick Fuentes is in bed with the jews. Hail!”

 

I’m not sure Nick Fuentes is in bed with the jews though. I think that’s because there’s a lot of things you can say about Nick, but I don’t think he’s in bed with the jews. I think that would be a mischaracterisation of his position. Unless it’s not and I’m wrong. I don’t know. Maybe I am wrong but I don’t think so.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moving on, moving on.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. VM gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great stream both. Mark on your stream on Farage it’s worth noting he’s repeatedly strategy of bailing ship the moment people are supposedly led to victory. For example, immediately after the Brexit vote he had the power to action it from Brussels.”

 

No he didn’t have the power to action Brexit from Brussels. The person who had the power to action Brexit immediately was David Cameron. David Cameron could have triggered, I think it was called some Article 5 which would have allowed Britain to leave and he actually resigned as Prime Minister rather than triggering the exit thing. The only man in Britain that can trigger the exit clause was actually the Prime Minister. That is was definitely not Farage’s fault in any anyway. And Farage remained on as an MEP in Brussels until the very last day that Britain had MEPs.

 

MLG gave 15. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Phenomenal guest! The Aussie method is the way to go!”

 

Well, thank you very much. David gave 25. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Tom, what are your views, if you have any, on Senator Gerald Renick*? He seems to be ruffling a lot of feathers in Parliament.”

 

[1:48:22]

 

[* Gerard Rennick is an Australian politician who has been a Senator for Queensland since July 2019. He was elected as a member of the Liberal National Party of Queensland and sat with the Liberal Party in Parliament, until resigning from the party in 2024 to sit as an independent. As of 10 September 2024, Rennick sits as a member of his party, the People First Party. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s so that I don’t bore your audience because you probably don’t know who that is in Britain. He’s a ex-Liberal party guy. He was elected as a Liberal, so the centre Right and he got kicked out of the party for being too Right-wing. And he’s not. I wouldn’t consider him Right-wing. I would consider him just a centrist. I’ve never heard him say anything Right-wing by our standards.

 

But of course the standard of Right-wing is so low that basically just investigating corruption of the Left makes you Right-wing. So I have been keeping my eye on him. I have been watching the things he’s been doing and he seems like possibly the most honest and respectable statesman that’s in the Australian Parliament. I have nothing but good things to say about him.

 

I don’t really know what he thinks of Israel and zionism and the jews to be honest. But I have seen him come out quite clearly saying that the jewish community, you know, pushed these Hate Speech laws and that the government pushed these Hate Speech laws full knowing that the caravan attack was a hoax. So he’s actually started to dabble in a little bit of common sense anti-semitism, which for someone in Parliament is a very scary thing to do from the Right.

 

So I think that he is possibly one of the only honest statesmen that Australia has. And that there is still an old White guard. I am not giving up on Australia as a whole. We’ve had some great judges, we’ve had some great judgements in the courts.

 

I mean, when I went to the court for the entrapment operation, the judge which wished Jacob and myself luck with our future. And the Left were seething about that and she gave us a very, very fair judgement, and she did actually really look after us in terms of making sure that we wouldn’t lose at the Supreme Court. She spent a month writing out, I don’t know how many pages it was.

 

And then when we went to the Supreme Court, we got a good judgement at the Supreme Court which was a great victory for justice for White Australians. I was honestly shocked!

 

I was not black pilled, but I was obviously pessimistic as to how the Australian institutions would go dealing with me. I thought I was going to be thrown away for 15 years. And I was quite amazed at how much of an old guard there is still in Australia that knows that the country is being run by paedophiles. And they know which judges and politicians and media people are paedophiles and are getting away with it. They know this!

 

And so when they see young guys like Jacob and I going through the courts, they seem to step on a lot of toes to not be too cruel to us, which is really all the friends you can kind of ask for at this stage of the game. We still got punished, but it was nominal. I got sentenced to one month in jail for something I didn’t do, but I’d already suffered seven months in jail, so I didn’t get any extra jail, and I’ve got six months in the bank.

 

So yeah, I think that Rennick is an example of the old guard. He’s part of the old White men and women that are entrenched in the system that have done that strategy, that have tried to play the game by the rules and they actually care about Australia. I think he actually genuinely cares about Australia, which makes him an absolute anomaly in the Australian Parliament. And certainly if I was not doing what I’m doing, I would be fledging my full support towards him.

 

But that’s probably not beneficial to him in the way that I think NJP endorsed Trump or David Duke or whatever. You know, I’m not doing that in an official stance, but I see only good and honest and honourable things coming from that man. I’m very impressed by one of the last statesmen I think Australia will ever have.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. VM gave $3. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“On electioneering. Building power and political system without already having community networks and foolproof infrastructure is like building your sandcastle next to the tide. Permanence is key.”

 

Thank you so much! Stuart gave $15. Thank you very much. Said:

 

“Thank you. Mark, the guest I’ve been waiting for. Seeing you two together is great. Question for Tom. Do you think Sam will have you on again? You did really well there.”

 

[1:52:30]

 

Thomas Sewell: Sam Newman? Possibly. Yeah. He actually called me afterwards and told me that:

 

“All these jews were calling him and that it was so frustrating that what they’re saying about him isn’t true.”

 

And:

 

“I know the truth!”

 

That he was just giving me a fair go and that:

 

“He wasn’t saying he agreed with my views, and why are these jews attacking me? And they’re coming after my hall of fame!”

 

And he was being my buddy for a couple hours afterwards. So I thought that was interesting. I didn’t expect that. Maybe he’ll have me on again in a year or so when he feels the need to stir the pot again. And maybe it’ll be best that I go on by myself so that he doesn’t have anyone else to flagellate. He has to attack me, man on man. He has to play the man. You know what I mean?

 

Like, he’s a footy boy, so he’d understand that there was no need to go after Blair. But Blair and Sam Newman were both ruckman. Blair not at the same level. Blair never played in AFL*, but Blair comes from an AFL family. I technically come from an AFL family as well, somewhat. My second cousin was a big player at one of the big clubs as well, and his first cousin is currently playing at one of the big clubs. So we are connected to the AFL scene. It is a small world. And that obviously didn’t get mentioned. You wouldn’t want to humanise us too much.

 

[* The Australian Football League (AFL) is the pre-eminent professional competition of Australian rules football. It was originally named the Victorian Football League (VFL) and was founded in 1896 as a breakaway competition from the Victorian Football Association (VFA), with its inaugural season in 1897. It changed its name to Australian Football League in 1990 after expanding its competition to other Australian states in the 1980s. The AFL publishes its Laws of Australian football, which are used, with variations, by other Australian rules football organisations.]

 

But yeah, it was interesting, his attitude. They’re both ruckman, they’re both big boys. As everyone knows, that’s met Blair in person. And Sam Newman’s a huge guy as well for his age. I mean, he’s 80.

 

A lot of people are saying he’s schizophrenic. He’s not schizophrenic. He’s just senile. He’s 80! I mean, to be that sharp at 80 is really impressive. He’s a thoroughbred, an absolute thoroughbred. So obviously it’s not nice, the things he said about Blair, and Blair handled himself very well in his responses.

 

But, yeah, I would happily go back on Sam Newman’s podcast. And whisper to the Boomers a little bit more truth!

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. For Camarade gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“True Blue Ridgy Dig Dinky D. She’ll be right. Coming up, Apples, Chopper and Jake the Musk. Always looking for new New Zealand and Australia movies. I hear Wolf Creek 3 is finally in production. Tom, the first two movies were top draw. Any new productions to look out for?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Not a new production, but the best Australian movie I’ve seen in the last couple of years is a movie called Long Tan, which is a movie with the guy that plays the lead actor is the guy that plays Ragnar in Vikings, and he plays the Australian, I think, captain or lieutenant that’s fighting in the battle of Long Tan in the Vietnam War. And that’s a historical battle. 6th Battalion. I learnt all this when I joined the army, and I knew it obviously, before, but I really studied it in depth. And it’s an absolute! It’s just a story of true Australian grit. Outnumbered, surrounded, and you fight through and you take casualties, but you still win. And that’s the Australian spirit from Kokoda to Long Tan. It’s a story of grit and endurance and Australians constantly punching above their weight. So great movie. I’m a very big movie critic. I know you are as well, Mark, but it’s hard to impress me. I’ll be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Would you come and do a movie review?

 

Thomas Sewell: 100% 100%!

 

Mark Collett: Have you ever seen, … There’s two really great Australian films that people don’t talk about enough. Don’t know if you’ve seen them, but one’s called Snow Town, which is one of the most depressing films I’ve ever seen! It’s about the John Bunting bodies in barrels film. And there was a psychological horror film called the Babadook about.

 

Thomas Sewell: I didn’t like that.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I thought that was really good! And the little kid, though, he’s just so annoying! [chuckling] He’s the most child, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t like horror films, and not because I don’t like being scared. I like being scared. It’s thrilling.

 

But the reason why I have a particular taste with horror films is that I don’t like characters that I can’t view myself. As and when I’m watching a movie, I like to feel a sense of closeness to the, to at least someone within the film. But horror movies are full of idiots that constantly do the wrong things. And I can’t empathize with that. And I have to turn it off. Because that is actually more painful than the horror! That is the for me, the horror is the stupidity of the person making all the mistakes and not dealing with the problem. That traumatizes me deep in my soul! It hurts. I’m angry and I turn off the movie! I’m not scared. I’m just angry. Which kind of is a bit of a metaphor for my life politically. I’m not scared of the system. I hate them! I want justice for our people. But I’ll leave that rant for another day.

 

Mark Collett: I will say this though. In the Babadook, there’s obviously the story.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’re still trying to sell the Babadook to me! [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: No, no!

 

Thomas Sewell: Let me hear it.

 

Mark Collett: There’s a pop up book for kids which obviously scares the little boy because the Babadook is he’s like:

 

“Can you read me a book before bed? I want this book.”

 

And it’s got like the scary man in it. And at first he thinks it’s fun, but it’s actually what sort of brings the monster into the house. But somebody actually made that book. It became so popular and they go for like one and a half thousand sort of Australian dollars on Ebay because they’re really rare. So that book actually does have memorabilia out there that it’s really sought after. But I wouldn’t suggest reading the Babadook book to your child even if you could afford it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Quite emotionally [chuckling] scarring! Bluey Waffen, which is the best name ever! Do, do your kids like Bluey?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, that I haven’t shown them television yet.

 

[1:58:06]

 

 

Mark Collett: If there’s one show that is definitely approved, it’s Bluey. It’s a really good show and it’s quite wholesome. That’s a Marky recommendation. Bluey Waffen gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Why do Whites tend to favour individualism over group identity? Is it a genetic trait of the White man or is it learnt behaviour? Congrats on the baby, Mark. Tom looks infinitely more Australian with a mustache.”

 

I think Whites are. Whites are individualistic because it’s been., … But it wasn’t always that way.

 

If you look at Britain in the 1970s, there were still absolutely huge White communities, like the mining communities that stood up to the Thatcher government, stood up against the police, literally fought pitched battles with the police over the winter of discontent in 1979. Western individualism came about post the 1980s materialistic lifestyle boom! Really. You can actually before that, you see amazing White communities all over the UK. I don’t know what it’s like in Australia, but individualism really became a thing in the UK from the 80s onwards.

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm, I’m struggling to find a short answer because I know we’re close to the end of the show and we’re going to get through everything. I have a very long answer which I have to do on my own stream. But the short version of it is that we’ve always been both. Why are Whites perceived as more individualistic? Well, we currently, I mean, this is going to upset some people. It’s because we don’t have a strong religion. We need to have a strong religion. It’s really a spiritual sense that’s going to create strength in us. We’re always going to be individuals, if the building block is not correct. And the building block, in my opinion of religion is small community and those small communities uniting with other small communities on the basis of a shared religious, political, cultural and sense of manners. So we are too, we are naturally, I think, slightly more individualistic than the other races.

 

But that is actually our strength. But where we need to come together and form collectives, we’re not doing it correctly. The building block is the family from the family you have, the extended family from the extended family you have your friends and their families. And I’ve been writing about this stuff recently and reading. And you know, the Romans called this the faytri [sp], which was like the stage between a group of families. We call it family friends. I wonder if the etymology is similar, the idea your friends coming from faytri, but this idea that you build community with the people that you’re closest to in terms of values and manners and race and identity and stuff like this. And then your children grow up together instead of going to these big giant, you know, industrial schools. And this localism creates a sense of strong community because you’re actually related to each other.

 

Like the idea of a proper community and where White people are doing things wrong is who are you making children with is obviously the most important decision you have to make in your life. Who is your life partner in that sense? But the second most important decision from a genetic perspective is who are your friends, who are your closest friends? Because in theory, in a wholesome society, your kids are growing up together. And you know what happens when they’re teenagers, what happens when they’re in their early 20s? And your families are that close. You go to church together or you celebrate, you know, intrinsic Aryan celebrations together. Who are you having Christmas with? Who are you having Easter with? Who are you having Yule with? Who are you having Midsummer with? Or are your kids just part of the great liberal democracy experiment and going to fucking Mardi Gras and getting lost in the abyss! Are they going to Mardi Gras or are they having Midsummer in your little community? And that’s the foundation of the faytri, which is the extended family, which is all your family, friends and then me, and if me and Mark lived in the same area in England for example, or if Mark lived in Australia and we were mates and he’s got a wife and he’s got kids and I’ve got a wife and I’ve got kids. Fast forward 20, 30 years, our kids are hanging out. His sons and my daughters, my sons and his daughters.

 

At some point something, you know, we’re gonna, me and Mark we’re gonna share grandchildren. And no one thinks like this, that your friends are actually, … Like when you’re old men, the men you’re surrounding yourself with in theory aren’t your friends, they’re actually your co-grandparenting together and co-greatgrandparent together. And this is where political strength comes from.

 

And a lot of people don’t realise this. This is why the community building element., … And they’re going to call us a cult. Of course they’re going to call us a cult, but they’re all doing it. They’re all strengthening those intergenerational marriage ties in the blood. They’re all doing it. Now we don’t want to inbreed. We don’t want people marrying their first cousins. But Mark and I aren’t first cousins. Our children aren’t going to get sick if they hang out together. They’re not going to come out demented like the, oh no, Mark will say:

 

“Be careful, don’t say a specific race. It could be vilification.”

 

Mark Collett: Oh no, you absolutely can in this case. I mean there’s a big problem with the Pakistani Muslim community. The point where there are special in certain parts of the country like Bradford, there are special sort of leaflets on the wall in hospital saying, “Do not marry your first cousin”.

 

[2:03:45]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And I mean they’re retarded to start with. So if like, yeah, I’m not even going to go down that train of thought.

 

But yeah, this is where the basic root of political power comes from within a democracy. Within a different kind of order. It comes from a martial culture.

 

And I think that we should have a healthy balance between the feminine and the masculine, between Venus and Mars, between the community building and the political brotherhood. The order. There is an order, there is a hierarchy, there is a masculine institution that builds a brotherhood of men in common identity, in common ideas, ideation. That has to be balanced, of course with the community building side of things and building those strong bonds. And what stronger bond do you have with people? And this is endemic!

 

So if we want to talk about what’s happening in South Africa or we want to talk about what’s happening in Australia or we want to talk about what’s happening with the grooming gangs in England, for example, where a community can survive things like these grooming gang attacks is about accountability and responsibility. And the people that were affected by the grooming gangs in England, I’m just making a generalisation here. Were people that were communityless. There were people that were in weak, isolated, disadvantaged, small families, or no family at all! They were wards of the state. And they are the vulnerable people. They are vulnerable and they’re vulnerable because that doesn’t happen. And I’ve done this rant a couple times and it’s not actually to do with this topic, it’s to do with politics in general. And it was actually to do with Covid was how it was raised to me.

 

I was working on a farm and I was building an old guy shed. I was putting a roof on his shed as part of my work as a labourer. And this old guy came over to me. He was 73 years old. His great grandfather purchased that farm from the Crown prior to federation. So pre-1901. And his family has lived on this farm the whole existence that Australia has existed. And he said to me:

 

“Do you know why they did that Covid thing to you? You know how they got all you guys locked up and how they got you all bundled up and all that shit they forced on people, you know how they did it?”

 

And then he’s like, he said:

 

“When I was your age, there was six families here. I’m the last one left. I’m the only one left on my land. All the rest have been bought up and pushed out by the local government through taxation and everything else, and the property developers. I’m the only one left. But when I was your age, there was six families here and I came from the smallest family. There was only seven or eight of us, but the McMillan’s had 14 and the Jeffersons had 12.”

 

And he’s pointing at all these farms and he’s saying that:

 

“If a police officer did that or if a man did that to one of any one of their sisters, …”

 

Because there was videos coming out in Australia where police officers were choking young girls and pushing them up against walls because they weren’t wearing a mask. And you had these 50 year old, fat, disgusting cops choking young women up against walls because they’re not wearing a mask. And what he said was:

 

“That wouldn’t have happened in my day because they would have had 150 men knocking on the police officer’s door. The McMillan’s would have been like, ‘that’s our sister’. The Jeffersons would have been like, ‘that’s my sister in law’. You know, this family over here would have been like, …”

 

And so the men in the community would have held that to account at a local level. Every local community would have held people to account at the local level. And because there is the concept that that would happen., … And the other thing was the police officer would have been from that community.

 

So how the system has done this to us is it has alienated and isolated us. And so then it can pick us off through a bureaucracy, through a cobweb of lies and traitors and evil people that can’t be held accountable. And I’m not talking in a dangerous way, Mark, but you mentioned before about the groomers. They don’t feel ashamed going to jail, but they feel shame losing their house.

 

Likewise, shame is a very powerful motivating tool. Who is shaming these police officers? No one’s shaming them! If they lived in a community and they behaved that way, they would be ostracized by everyone! No one would ever talk to that family ever again! The family itself would kick that police officer and disown them from the family, disown them from their inheritance, because the shame they brought on the whole community.

 

And the last thing this old man said to me was:

 

“They wouldn’t be able to do that to us. Because back in my day, we were a clan! We were a clan!”

 

Which is a faytri. We were a faytri. We were a powerful political entity of family, friends, of patriarchs that had big families. That is the building block of power. If you’re not doing that, you’re a fucking idiot! If you’re going off into the woods by yourself with you and your wife and two kids, you’re a fucking moron! All right? You need to build faytris. That is the building block of power! We need to tribe and train. And then from faytris there’s another step again.

 

But again, the man and the woman are the building block. Then the next building block is the family. Then the extended family, the intergenerational family. Having resources, having land, having the ability to sustain multiple sons, getting married, staying on the land, or staying as close as possible so that you’re not atomized and alienated and isolated. You are congregating, you are strong, you are together. You’re holding ground in an area, wherever that can be. And then your mates live around the corner or down the street. And he’s doing the same thing, and he’s doing the same thing. And if there’s six of you or 10 of you over 50 years, there could be a couple hundred of you. And then you can ally with other groups of a couple hundred. And now you have political power. This is how the Muslims can mobilise so many tens of thousands out of the mosque, for example.

 

So this is how White people need to treat the building block of democracy. We can’t survive in democracy if we’re not doing this. It leaves only the other option, which we won’t discuss, will we? Not yet.

 

[2:09:51]

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you, George Floyd Creepypasta gave $5. This is a long question, but if we can try and keep it as short as possible. He says:

 

“A question for Tom. Do you need to be a Christian to be a National Socialist?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I can keep that one really short. The answer is no! I’m not a Christian. Why would you. To me, that’s an offensive question. Why would you need to be Christian to be a National Socialist?

 

Mark Collett: I don’t know. I think the sort of National Socialist ideology applies to or can be applied to any racial or ethnic group. And during the Second World War, there were numerous different racial or ethnic groups and religious groups that all subscribed to that ideology.

 

Thomas Sewell: Also about a third of the SS were considered non-denomination, which meant that they weren’t Christians. They were God believing, non-denomination, let’s put it that way, about a third.

 

And I would argue that that’s probably a similar demographic that has always been within National Socialism in the 20th and, 21st century.

 

So I am God believing.

 

Mark Collett: One last question from Jagdeep Jano, who gave $5. Thanks so much. Said:

 

“Can Tom please detail the difference between Caramel island and Chocolate Island?”

 

I don’t know what this means.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes. [chuckling] I can’t. So I made a joke, because there’s another guy in the Australian Parliament called Babet, Senator Babet*, and he says similar talking points to this Senator Rennick. And you know, he’s blown up on social media, he’s got a huge following and he’s got a lot of basic takes that are pretty funny and in line with the total governance of the worldview.

 

[* Ralph Emmanuel Didier “Deej” Babet is an Australian far-Right populist and conservative politician. He has been a Senator for Victoria in the Australian Parliament since 2022, representing the United Australia Party. He is the party’s only current federal elected representative. Prior to entering politics he was a real estate agent. Wikipedia]

 

But obviously he’s caramel, he’s Mauritian, he’s from Mauritius. And they’re kind of like a mixed race bunch, a caramel bunch. You wouldn’t call him an Indian, you wouldn’t call him an African, but he’s certainly not White. He’s not even close. So we would racially designate that as “caramel” to some extent.

 

And what I said as a joke, which I’m still serious about, was that Babet, for all his benefits to the Australian Parliament, he’s not actually Australian. He wants to be Australian and he thinks he can be Australian.

 

And if people like me lose, then I guess then Australia will turn into Caramel Island and he will be Australian in that future Caramel island where people like me don’t exist. But I have a strong feeling that we’re going to win, that it’s not going to be a Caramel island, that it’s going to be a White island. And because Babbitt has done such a great service to White people, he’s not anti-White. He’s one of the only politicians in Parliament that’s not White. He’s one of these kind of tokens that does all of the pro-White talking points and he’s allowed to, he gets away with it because he’s not White.

 

And you know, what I said as a joke was that when we win, he’s the last one to get deported, because of his great service, and he’s getting deported first class. We’re going to get him a private jet and an island, and he’s going to go on the bronze power jet to Caramel Island, and he’s going to get all the caramel honeys that we deport, because that might distract the White Nationalist operation if we leave the caramel honeys. And all the [Mark laughs] caramel honeys are going to get deported to Caramel Island and Babet’s going to have the caramel honeys on Caramel Island and he can run his harem. And he’ll say:

 

“Thank you, Mr. Thomas Sewell! Thank you for building me a big house on the Caramel Island. I hope you enjoy the big house on White Island.”

 

And I’ll say:

 

“You know, good fences make good neighbours!”

 

You know, it is what it is. And I wouldn’t call him an ally, but as I said, I think that’s a good deal. I think that’s the deal. If he’s nice to us, we’ll be nice to him. And then we can part ways when the mission’s done.

 

What Chocolate Island is that the joke was that obviously Africa is Chocolate Island, and it’s a shit hole because it’s full of Africans. But you could run like an experiment where you make an island full of all the, like, house negroes, like Dan Powell and Kanye West.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, we can’t use that term in this country. That’s a jailable term.

 

Thomas Sewell: Which one? Oh, sorry, I don’t want to say it.

 

Mark Collett: Any n-word is a jailable term, Tom.

 

So we’re getting towards the end of the stream anyway. We might be getting exuberant.

 

[2:14:17]

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay. The difference is pretty clear. It’s like you have White people, you have spicy White people, you have caramel people, and then you have chocolate and black people. And that’s just a basic, that’s an easy racial classification everyone can understand. Everyone’s got a slightly different version of what they define as spicy White. Is Nick Fuentes spicy White? Well, who knows?

 

Mark Collett: Who knows?

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, everyone’s got their own classification. But yeah, I’ll leave it there.

 

Mark Collett: We have run over time, and I have just had a text from the wife about being needed on baby duty, so I’m gonna have to get off in a second. We’ve just had our own, my son arrived just over two weeks ago.

 

So we’re two deep now, the same as you guys. But, yeah, it’s a shame we aren’t neighbours. Our kids would love playing together.

 

Anyway, it’s been a really enjoyable show. Tom’s been amazing to tonight in a really good sport. I’d love to do a film review with you, and I will be in touch about that shortly. But do you have any final thoughts very quickly before we shut things down?

 

Thomas Sewell: Vitality! That’s what we need. Vitality! Aesthetics and vitality! If we can get that right, we’re going to win!

 

So that’s the focus.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, Thomas. It’s been an amazing show tonight. I’d just like to thank everybody who took part. Biggest thanks, of course, goes to Thomas. Massive thanks to everyone who donated so generously.

 

I will be back later in the week with Joel Davis on Sunday talking about whether National Socialism can be resurrected. He argues yes. Keith argues no. I wanted them to debate each other. That would have been far more entertaining.

 

But instead he’s just talking to me. And I’ll probably try and argue some of the points just from a devil’s advocate point of view. That’d be Sunday night. Got a video out on Friday, and I’ll be back same time next week for another episode of Patriotic Weekly Review.

 

As always, thank you to everyone who donated. Thanks. Massive thanks to Thomas. It’s been an amazing show, but the biggest thanks always goes out to this amazing community. I love you all. Stay strong, keep fighting. I’ll see you all same time next week. Thank you and good night.

 

[2:16:12]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/20/2025 = 661)

Mark Collett
4 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

meaty
50 minutes ago
Hi Mark , Can you put a link up for your Friday pod cast with DDD ?

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@Loke
it could be

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
o/ bonjour

@Loke
1 hour ago
is sewell the name of a good taylpr?

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
whens he doing a stream next

withey
1 hour ago
goodnight all 14/88 28 wpww

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
o/

NiggerballsJohnson
1 hour ago
Hail Thomas Sewell – The Bestest. o/

@BlackwaterPark
1 hour ago
Yup. Great stream!

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

@LeighStewy
1 hour ago
cheers lads

Reclaim
1 hour ago
Haiti is a chocolate island

@Ihtultu
1 hour ago
Good evening everyone.

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
Hail our Folk o///

Ethno Nationalist
1 hour ago
1488

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
Great stream, what I have seen

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
hes a mcflurry

@Loke
1 hour ago
thx good topics

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Hail Pa Hail NSN

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
HAIL VICTORY

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Be kind to yourself by living healthy

Vettekid1488
1 hour ago
ohhhh I didn’t know Mark had a second kiddo

Nordic Warrior
1 hour ago
1488

Jagdeep Jano
1 hour ago
Great stream

@ItWasMadeUp
1 hour ago
Thank you o/ 1488

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
what knee grows ?

withey
1 hour ago
14/88

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
NS Regards all \o

Parken
1 hour ago
1488

Nordic Warrior
1 hour ago
\o

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
\o

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
1488

@WhiteWalker
1 hour ago
\o

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
The Spanish word for black is illegal in Britain?

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
Really only Nordics and Alpines are White. 1488

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
That’s a very complicated topic to discuss

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
o/

@Ihtultu
1 hour ago
fuentes is mixed.

@Joesmith
1 hour ago
14

danzimmons
1 hour ago
no uk visits for Sewell

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
Next weeks PWR will be broadcast from HMP

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
he can out talk david duke..

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
We have a large chinese and japanese population on the west coast that have been here for nearly 200 years.

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Caramac

Jagdeep Jano
1 hour ago
:joy: :joy: :joy:

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago

@charlesgerety1
davis lammy, diane abbott ect..

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
Hail Victory

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
National Socialism puts anything that brings harm to the Race in work camps.

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
lol

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
I think it’s ridiculous that Non Whites are at times the only non anti whites in politics

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
WWW – Whites Will Win

Reclaim
1 hour ago
all you need to do is be a good White man

danzimmons
1 hour ago
we win or else

Vettekid1488
1 hour ago
the Bible is full of tribalism and bloodlines

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
Churches have sold us out as of today..

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
Coffee coloured as Alan Partridge says

danzimmons
1 hour ago
gets deported last

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
National Socialism was Christianity put into IRL action.

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Leo Frank gives loads of insight as to how jews see the world.

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
THINK FOR YASELF WHO EVER ASKED THAT QUESTION

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Let’s go for another 45 minutes please

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Lol

withey
1 hour ago
Nazis in Australia are the same as Nazis in the UK, hooray

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
*think

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago

@Spectromancer
Sanhedrin 57a: When a jew murders a gentile, there will be no death penalty. No wonder (((they))) he’s innocent.

0KT0BER
1 hour ago
the NS had Sachsenhain built

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
o/

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@Totenkopfelite
well done and fully deserved

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Toms doing his best to not fed post

Vettekid1488
1 hour ago
no village anymore

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Akin to the Mary Phagan Knights who lynched Leo Frank

@Joesmith
1 hour ago
i hate old bill there was cctv evdence of a low iq afican kicking me in the face and they did not arrest him insted they threntend to arrest me for using the word paki

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
It’s really a crime against nature

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
The Balk Right have collectives with both Christian Identity and Asatru. Both are folkish.

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@charlesgerety1
100 %

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
I want to go to Sydney just to hang with the wild cockatoos.

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago

@TheGreatWillDo
Im not a christian restart.

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
good show o/ white power or how they say in chinese Y PA!

@Loke
1 hour ago
Tribal structures

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
We would all be on the same page and have the same goals in mind in a ethnostate

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
Tribe up

danzimmons
1 hour ago
it is a number’s game

Speak your mind
1 hour ago
Thanks Mark and Tom. Wishing everyone a good night/day.

@Joesmith
1 hour ago
jhon humble the hoxer showed how useless old bill are

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
did he beat all his court dates or aint he out the woods yet..

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
But wait, the ADL says Frank was innocent!?

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
Unite the clans

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago

@TaarasTopGuy
not 1 church out there that would turn away a n*gga

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
The inbreeding is perhaps why Ashkenazis have such high rates of schizophrenia

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago

@TaarasTopGuy
religion is just an extention

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
I believe both are necessary. It doesn’t have to be specifically Christian, but a shared faith is essential. Both racial and religious unity play a crucial role. Complete unity is impossible when one group is Christian while the other is pagan or atheist.

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Speaking of inbred…. Ashkenazis

@Joesmith
1 hour ago
when ever i see a pakistani women with a disabled kid i think you dirty bitch

@BlackwaterPark
1 hour ago
“Don’t huff petrol from a can and don’t marry your first cousins”

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
Most ethnic Europeans get uncomfortable with the White Ethnostate question. One must Balkanize away with these suffering that psychosis.

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
In a healthy society there will be the common ethnic cohesion which would result in a type of larger family extension for all

withey
1 hour ago
q open racist talk

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
“The black haired jewish boy waits with satanic delight on his face for the hour when he can corrupt the unsuspecting girl with his blood and in seducing her steal her from her people.” Adolf Hitler

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
inbred p

danzimmons
1 hour ago
keep it in the family, just not like jews do

Stan1
1 hour ago
110%

Stan1
1 hour ago
100%

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
There’s the immediate family and the extended society family

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Or marry a crypto )ew / )ewess

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
This is my religion o/

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
Add social media with the Frankfurt School, and you have degenerates.

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
they marry

danzimmons
1 hour ago
yeah watch out for red flags

withey
1 hour ago

@TheGreatWillDo
agreed

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
There’s also a good Aussie Tv series called: Mr Inbetween

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
The Frankfurt School destroyed collective thought, with the Critical Theory and Repressive Tolerance.

withey
1 hour ago
abolish religion

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
its racial not spiritual..

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Not sure why it went the opposite way

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
Fu*k religion

@BlackwaterPark
1 hour ago
The number of POC libertarians is always near zero.

Teutonic Truth
1 hour ago
Only one “religion” warns about the Sinagogues of Satan.

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
We evolved in a environment that selected for group cooperation also it’s odd we have such a issue with individuallity

withey
1 hour ago
we are a collective

@Disinfectant
1 hour ago
You’d need to define individualism. Easy to blanket in the modern sense.

@Mitch
1 hour ago
70s is a 93-95ish White British society so not shocking

Teutonic Truth
1 hour ago
All White people need to hear ACCEPT’S “Blood of the Nations” album.

withey
1 hour ago
have you heard the word about bird and the spider how it wiggled and it jiggled and it wiggled inside her

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
HOME & AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
hahaaa that’s the one lads

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
Bluey is alright

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Cat dog is the champ of 90’s cartoons

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Read The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens by George Lincoln Rockwell as a bedtime read

Brezel Blitz
1 hour ago
Have you ever, ever felt like this, when strange things happen are you going round the twist.. great stuff.

withey
1 hour ago

@ToffeeL10
I loved that, the song is apt

@Disinfectant
1 hour ago
If there’s no relation, or empathy for a character you’ll never feel invested enough to give a shit.

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago

@BlackPigeonPilled
I think the order was one of the best movies they could have done about us, or well not the best but you get what i mean hopefully, I see it as positive propaganda in a way

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
PUGWALL!!!!

@Michael57DE
1 hour ago
Hail Mark. Hail Thomas. Hail our Folk and Hail our Gods. Great to a powerhouse speaking freshly

Brezel Blitz
1 hour ago
Braindead is a good one from New Zealand.

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
Anyone remember that Aussie kids TV show in the 90’s Round The Twist? That was boss

@TheGreatWillDo
1 hour ago
ONCE WERE WARRIORS!

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
:joy:

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
That red head bastard was on a mission to transfer himself into a human

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
lmao

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago

@ToffeeL10
Jinx

Europe Is Ours
1 hour ago
Yeah Chopper was great

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Chucky Doll was my favorite horror

@NewJigger
1 hour ago
Babadook is about the only horror film I like

@noreplacement
1 hour ago
Walkabout with Jenny Agguter swimming

@BlackPigeonPilled
1 hour ago
review The Order 2024, I thought it was good. The speech of Mathews was

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago
Can’t beat Chopper for Aussie films

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
What about Chopper? lol

@SerenaJB
1 hour ago
‘The Dish’ is a really good Australian film.

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
battle truck

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago

@Stan1
his eyes are narrow too !

withey
1 hour ago
“tomorrow when the war began”- great film

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Now we are left with these people who around 80% are unacceptable for civilized society. WTF dude!

Goose Steppenwolf
1 hour ago
two legends

Teutonic Truth
1 hour ago
PatrioticAlternative.org .UK

Europe Is Ours
1 hour ago
Travis Fimmel

Stan1
1 hour ago

@Totenkopfelite
english name, but wouldn’t rule it out

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Marcus Garvey has the right idea of the back to Liberia movement

@Disinfectant
1 hour ago

@vengeance
Right. Odd to hear.

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
I think Lincoln just said what people wanted to hear.

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@charlesgerety1
lol

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
(((Newman))) ?

danzimmons
1 hour ago
^

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
They should have been shipped back. Abe Lincoln understood this

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Any )ew is Sam ?

danzimmons
1 hour ago
point stands

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Australians started out as white slaves really.

danzimmons
1 hour ago
jews

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Blacks didn’t swim here.

@Totenkopfelite
1 hour ago
Kvetching

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Englishmen sent abroad & create a paradise, blacks sent abroad & destroy paradise l

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
We knew Trump is not that guy pal

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
nice to hear that there are still good people in the system

@vengeance
1 hour ago
njp never endorsed trump

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@jagdeepjano

danzimmons
1 hour ago
7 month’s gulag, for being honorable

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Happy happy happy!

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Australian ls have quite a interesting background when they arrived from Great Britain as criminals that weren’t wanted. Now they are great people

Jagdeep Jano
1 hour ago

@TheThinRedLine
:joy: :joy: :joy:

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
Trump signed that antisemetism EO, on January 30th. Taking care of his constituents, the traitorous Jews. Trump is Jewish interests first.

withey
1 hour ago
I’m shocked

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago

@jagdeepjano
one isw for afros the other for jeets

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
He means well I think however he’s only good for White suburban normies to wake up

@Nathan_Swindon
1 hour ago
he’s like a more libertarian rupert lowe

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago

@Ral9010NatSoc
Exactly

Jagdeep Jano
1 hour ago
$5.00
Can Tom please detail the difference between ‘caramel island’ and ‘chocolate island’

1
0

@Ral9010NatSoc
1 hour ago
NS is a racial doctrine not a theological one.

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
Aussies

@BlackwaterPark
1 hour ago

@charlesgerety1
He comes across as very intelligent to me, but just has an odd sorta autistic mannerism about him.

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
I’m not but at least I stay in my lane respectfully

Europe Is Ours
1 hour ago
Article 50

danzimmons
1 hour ago
TOMS not a Christian

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
Fuentes is def a bad small hat wearing boy

danzimmons
1 hour ago
ye lol

charlesgerety1
1 hour ago
Jason isn’t smart enough to be a leader in our movement

George Floyd Creepypasta
1 hour ago
$5.00
A question for Tom. Do you need to be Christian to be NS?

1
0
danzimmons
1 hour ago
Feduentes is N bed with an N

@Joesmith
1 hour ago
bet NWG meet a jewish lass lol

Teutonic Truth
1 hour ago
Go Free! with CommonSense Nationalism

@Ihtultu
1 hour ago
what is Jason doing these days?

danzimmons
1 hour ago
verdammt ja! lol

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
NWG

@BMC1488
1 hour ago

@JohnTheConfederate
:hundred_points:

danzimmons
1 hour ago
im

danzimmons
1 hour ago
F^ck-em speaking German

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
1 hour ago
Women should have porcelain, unmarked skin. There’s nothing that could replace the natural beauty of that white skin. All Euro boys should only chase the unmarked women. Don’t reward our women being sluts.

@BlackPigeonPilled
1 hour ago
robert jay mathews RIP

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
Yeah the processed food or the constant radiation from the phone near your nutsack doesnt do anything. Tattoos = 6 million nukes worth of cancer.

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
Hail Hogan

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Gutes Zeug

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Sewell is top lad

@Disinfectant
1 hour ago
Good stuff

danzimmons
1 hour ago
for any. Mi6 glow nibba’s

ThinRedLine
1 hour ago
Thomas Sewell is a good leader and a very motivational speaker

@Disinfectant
1 hour ago
Top Gear. You hear that Rand?

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Tattoos increase your risk of cancer x3 according to a recent Danish study.

danzimmons
1 hour ago
Hulk hogan

danzimmons
1 hour ago
HH

ToffeeL10
1 hour ago

@BlackPigeonPilled
always gtsy my mate

@Spectromancer
1 hour ago
Thomas is really good. I think I had him confused with someone else.

@BlackPigeonPilled
1 hour ago

@ToffeeL10
mate

@TaarasTopGuy
1 hour ago
I mean i have no problem with tattoos, depends what kind. Alt girls in my experience are easier to bring to our side than the average normie.

danzimmons
1 hour ago
lol

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
more red flags than China

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
face white*

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
you cannot call her fake white, that face is south american mystery meat

danzimmons
2 hours ago
more red flags than a race track

Better Based Than Erased
2 hours ago
Only the face is White. The body is more…blue ?

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
You can’t go to another part of Australia ?

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
2 hours ago
Tattoos are a sign of low impulse control.

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
tatttos, piercings, e whore outfits, fake lips, shes got all red flags

danzimmons
2 hours ago

withey
2 hours ago

@danzimmons
especially like that

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@chief
Moody correct lad

danzimmons
2 hours ago
tattoo’s are a huge red flag

@Loke
2 hours ago
Is Thomas being teased with being a kiwi?

Chief Moody
2 hours ago
Any woman with lots of tattoos all over her is not only not attractive but also a major red flag

Better Based Than Erased
2 hours ago
Will the real Keith please stand up..

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
the police were also wearing a hat and sunglasses so….

danzimmons
2 hours ago
been there man

@SerenaJB
2 hours ago
Never any e-girls.

Stan1
2 hours ago
Barge pole

Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
“Gay and homosexual” are code words for: Perverted Queers.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
sorry brother

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
2 hours ago
Them simps love those e-thots.

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
her body is alright, but that face of hers, looks like a mestizo male tranny

@Joesmith
2 hours ago

@danzimmons
yea she draged me to hang out with a women i lituly paid to leave me alone

Better Based Than Erased
2 hours ago
Fast life history strategy I believe they say….

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@withey
noodle limbs

@vengeance
2 hours ago
he looks like a teenager too how old is that hoe

danzimmons
2 hours ago
at least he’s not homosexual lol

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago
Keith is a very kind person

withey
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
Steve laws is lanky

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
What on earth was Woods thinking?

danzimmons
2 hours ago
crack?’

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
that is body dysmorphia

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
2 hours ago
Fooking lot lizard.

@Mitch
2 hours ago
lol

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
my ex was crazy at one point she started smoking crack

danzimmons
2 hours ago
biotch! you knew i was a snake when you saw me”

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
I don’t trust men on our side who are built like coathangers tbh. Him n Steve Laws are a pair of skinny gimps.

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
2 hours ago
“Stop being a slut”

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
she looks non white tranny, woof

withey
2 hours ago
terrible look with the tattoos, terrible with the fake lips

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
lol, good advice

@noreplacement
2 hours ago
she’d have to pay me

Long Knife
2 hours ago
…they look like Vienna sausages

Reclaim
2 hours ago
I prefer a woman with Deep Space Nine tattoos

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
keith nooooo

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
he had to much to drink and was thinking with his dong

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago

@jagdeepjano
thanks!

Movement History
2 hours ago
Woods is a crypto-bolsheviek. Joel Davis is much better

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
seduced Keith then leaked all the DMs
https://x.com/EsoShaggy/status/1893870040119742570

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
rATHER HAVE A WANK

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago

@BlackwaterPark
Ive been doxxed by the news anyway, i used to be a bit more extreme in the scene when I was younger. Having crypto as a backup saved my ass.

Long Knife
2 hours ago
what happened to her lips ?

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
ewwww

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
lol

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
I would buy the US is 50% white.

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
yea the girl who doxzxed keioth woods dick pics, whop is he again

@PureNomad
2 hours ago
$14.88
So happy this PWR with Sewell finally happened. Been busy at work so will catch it fully tomorrow.

1
0

@BlackwaterPark
2 hours ago
Keith might have just gotten home from the Jameson brewery tour.

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
on twitter

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
So Keith isn’t nailing one of the Corrs sisters then?

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Who are we talking about here, Woods?

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
whats her name?

@Mitch
2 hours ago
I really believe US is 50% White or less

Callaghan
2 hours ago
Leave Keith alone

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
i was well drunk once there were these 2 women who fanced me but even in that state i did not like them

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
North Idaho may be 90% + Huwhite

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
i use to get into aruments with prostutes on market road because these ugly junkys make me sick

Movement History
2 hours ago
Hahaha the disgusting Fuentes crowd

@BlackwaterPark
2 hours ago

@TaarasTopGuy
Accounts closed? Damn. You’re on the state’s radar.

@frog.eyes
2 hours ago
link, so we can get a look at her?

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
I forget about Boise. Yeah lots of diversity there.

Carnegie
2 hours ago

@Totenkopfelite
I think when Guderian said that he was surrounded in Moscow by 70 plus Soviet divisions.

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
lmao

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
blood dilution lol

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago
I think having some money in crypto is essential for people that are active in the scene, ive had 2 bank accounts closed in a year.

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Silver slugs make easy currency. If you stamp them you can get feds on your ass tho.

@FreedomFoundation
2 hours ago
Idaho is 80%

Kevin
2 hours ago
they just print money these days

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Free Britain of Zionist Control

@BlackwaterPark
2 hours ago

@Spectromancer
Yeah, that’s a tough one but we have to figure it out. The dollar could go Argentina at some point.

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
uxoriousness is to be condemned

@ssanwaerter
2 hours ago
What term?

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
‘No e-girls. Not even once!’ – Nick Fuentes

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Having an alternative currency is essential.

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
I think breaking the jewish monopoly on power is a worthy focus and is not necessarily just a white thing.

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
\o

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Idaho is like 95% white but still controlled by jews.

White Nationalist (Balk Right)
2 hours ago
Good day from the Ozarkia Propaganda Minister. White Nationalists are and have been moving into Ozarkia, southern Missouri and northern Arkansas, where one will find over 90 contiguous counties with over 90% ethnic European populations. Here we prep the fall of the once Republic. 1488

withey
2 hours ago
polarisng both that’s red pilling

@Daniel
2 hours ago
H U W H I T E

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
taint bros

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago
We know who that is….Tate

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
I’ve no time for anybody who engages in rivalries between fellow white people. We’ve far bigger fish to fry.

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Naah – “There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.” General Heinz Guderian.

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
I don’t see the US in this so much.

Kevin
2 hours ago
TWOTAR was classic : Coach Red Pill vs Alt Hype was funny af

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
% mark

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago
No matter what nation we are all in this together

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Goats go to hell.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Britain and Australia standing together

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago

@noreplacement
Yeah my dad is a boomer it’s pretty difficult, he said in all seriousness to my mum that Axel Rudakabana was a ‘far right extremist’ because he had ‘Nazi documents’ on his computer lol

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
ah I see

Kevin
2 hours ago
the podcast called “I don’t speak German” with Daniel Harper & Jack Graham: Harper has panic attacks and just does film reviews now, he no longer attacks Nationalists that much .

withey
2 hours ago
hail

@TheThinRedLine

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
yes Sir

the woodlander
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
detention

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago
They are instigating this we are only the reaction

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@withey
hail

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Sh.t I am soo late

withey
2 hours ago
go to heaven and see them still shitting in the streets

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago
The average normie, whose grandparents or great-grandparents served on the Allies’ side, is harder to turn due to emotional ties to their inherited narrative. Their identity is often linked to the belief that their ancestors were on the “right side of history,”

@noreplacement
2 hours ago

@jagdeepjano
I’m a boomer and came too late to ethno nationalism. I rarely speak to people my age and when I do they tend to just stare straight ahead ha ha

Stan1
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
lol

the woodlander
2 hours ago

@BlackPigeonPilled
betz is a former british gov adviser

0KT0BER
2 hours ago
thats the podcast Marks talking about

@BlackPigeonPilled

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
some guy called professor betz said something similar recently too

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Dogs go to heaven. Jeets not so much.

0KT0BER
2 hours ago
that podcast was punted out to everyone, astroturf agogo

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago
Ive never seen pagan / christian natsoc infighting irl, only on the internet.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
$14.00
I came very late and will have to watch the replay

1
0
Reclaim
2 hours ago
I will meet my chickens in heaven

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
good to see you

Stan1
2 hours ago
Many thanks – totally agree

@AustrianPainter
2 hours ago
Indians aren’t human

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Water poo-rification

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
do nogs go to heaven?

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago

@noreplacement
I hear you

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago

@BlackwaterPark
Smash Bros style

danzimmons
2 hours ago
v

@Sweet_Nerevar
2 hours ago
“the horror

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Triumph of the Will

@BlackwaterPark
2 hours ago
Collett’s BP goes up 2 points with each F bomb.

@Daniel
2 hours ago
Woodlander, how many members have you guys got these days?

@noreplacement
2 hours ago

@jagdeepjano
yes, but when you argue with younger folk, they’re soy boys and stupid.

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
^

the woodlander
2 hours ago
get people involved in a non political organisation, point out the problems with the system, show them youre not a raving lunatic… change minds.

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
the same media claim male/female are optional choices like tommy k or mayo

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
Newman is a boomer coward. He had to do a humiliation ritual with Avi Yemini afterwards, wearing a kippah. Remember: when you argue with the average boomer, you are arguing with the TV

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago
The media portrayal is the biggest hurdle we face

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Aahhhh I’m gutted im late for this friggin traffic on the motorway

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Tribe & Train.

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago
I mean when the media constantly labels natsocs as evil monsters then you cant really blame the normie for believing it. The indoctrination is crazy.

Matt Hammond
2 hours ago
Ha! I was wondering who the special guest would be

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
My favourite part was when the journo went to ask the Aus PM about NSN and he had no clue about any “Nazi org” lol

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

WP Combat
2 hours ago
Sam Newman interviews Thomas Sewell and Blair

charlesgerety1
2 hours ago
They are surprised to see we are actually reasonable decent folks

Long Knife
2 hours ago
been checking YouTube out lately after a hiatus … a bunch of ‘crime story’ / ‘detective’ / ‘police interrogation’ channels have popped up in recent times … trannies & fags ‘shockingly’ make a routine appearances as the suspects & perps

MYSTIC
2 hours ago
Newman is schizo

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
Louis Theroux did a doc on Nazis in America, it was disgusting, he antagonised and patronised them. He’s not nearly as intelligent as he thinks he is. Smug pr*ck

Kevin
2 hours ago
Theroux going to South Africa was a complete joke, same with Metzger

withey
2 hours ago
loui just looks awkward and a prat

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
and he mogged Beardson lol

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
Louis Theroux is a freak, jew in spirit if he’s not a cryptojew

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
He documented Nick Fuentes

MYSTIC
2 hours ago

@Chief_Moody
Hi chief

Chief Moody
2 hours ago
Hey

@mystic1488

Kevin
2 hours ago
Australia has like 86 cities

@TruthfulThinking
2 hours ago
1
Thank you for all that you do gentlemen. I pray each day for our struggle and for you all. Keep up the good fight, many young white men are waking up. Hoping to get involved soon. Heil Victory.

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago
the “mainstream” media can be a great propaganda tool when used properly.

MYSTIC
2 hours ago
o/

@Mitch
2 hours ago
Apparently AUS has a lower White percentage than the UK….

danzimmons
2 hours ago
pathetic attempt at a hit piece

@vengeance
2 hours ago
the music always gets me

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Blonde White Baby Makers. What’s wrong with that?

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
“they’re having white babies reeee” lol

@vengeance
2 hours ago
yea yea yea oh colett covered this and it was absolutely nothing but a White mom and her kid, and then look at all this turrsm by nons THATS YOU GUYS SOMEHOW

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
That mom is pretty insane

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
LOL

@vengeance
2 hours ago
oh this isnt the picolini one

@vengeance
2 hours ago
nobody? marx brothers? oy gevalt, tough crowd

danzimmons
2 hours ago
lol

@vengeance
2 hours ago
LOOK AT PICOLINI, he may look like a cuck, he may act like a cuck, but dont let that fool you folks: he really is a cuck

Kevin
2 hours ago
Kaz Ross ?

@Daniel
2 hours ago
In Thomas We Trust

Speak your mind
2 hours ago

@vengeance
2 hours ago
yea lazy jew is the right take they jsut present it and expect the audience to have alreayd been trained like dogs to jsut go wow just wow

DerCherusker
2 hours ago
$5.00
“Think a thousand times before taking a decision, but after taking a decison never turn back even if you get a thousand difficulties.” Keep on fighting comrades.

1
0
Kevin
2 hours ago
that Dutch mother really seemed like she wanted all the attention on the recent special

@Sweet_Nerevar
2 hours ago
greasy

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
An expose would have been that the NSN actually love immigrants lol

Europe Is Ours
2 hours ago
A picture of them here 3rd one down.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-17/neo-nazi-extremist-intervention-radicalisation-four-corners/104930828

@TaarasTopGuy
2 hours ago

@vengeance
You mean the documentary music displaying them like awd 2.0 lol?

danzimmons
2 hours ago
activist’s judge’s journo’s & even musician’s

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Always remember this quote Tom “When you sacrifice for your community then you can walk with your head held up high.” Adolf Hitler

danzimmons
2 hours ago
finally

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
Huge numbers of British journalists are intelligence assets. Especially papers like The Times and the Telegraph.

@based88
2 hours ago
I been locked up for antisemitic stickers and pro white stickers in March 2023

Kevin
2 hours ago
i remember Tom from Patriotic Talks ages ago

Mark Collett
2 hours ago

@esoteriech
Live on Rumble too mate

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Destroy furry and paedo freaks

Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
“Homosexual and Gay” are code words for: Perverted Queers

@esoteriech
2 hours ago
odysee is probably the worst streaming platform oat

@AlternativePatriot
2 hours ago

@Ben012525
totally agree that the nationalist community is too male heavy but women don’t generally gravitate towards politics

The Resident Baker
2 hours ago
$14.88
Great show, Mark. Very pleased to finally see you and Tom in discussion. Does Tom have an update on Stephen Wells? Also congratulations to Tom on the recent birth of his second child.

1
0
withey
2 hours ago
why wait until they’re released?

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
We have a furry problem in the US. I think they count as pedo freaks.

Kevin
2 hours ago
^ 100%

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
She’s a nutjob who’s been sectioned in a mental hospital.

Kevin
2 hours ago
Kate is a gobby girl boss

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Don’t think Kate and PA get on

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
Kate despises PA lol

Jagdeep Jano
2 hours ago
$15.00
Hey both, question for Tom. You spoke about how Keith Woods recently had his cringeworthy private messages leaked by a former adult worker who is now a groyper, named Slayter. Could you give your take on this, and psychoanalyse Keith? Why was he attracted to her? Are men really that desperate?

1
0

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
Lol. She’s not a colleague of PA.

Kevin
2 hours ago
always have your own media and law fund for protests

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Bubba Kate

the woodlander
2 hours ago
yes…. thats PA should be

@LeighStewy
2 hours ago
White Defemation League

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago
$10.00
Your banners are awesome. ‘Destroy pedo freaks’ is possibly the greatest banner of all time.

1
0
Kevin
2 hours ago
does Rupert Murdoch own Sky News ?

@Daniel
2 hours ago
Can’t imagine still watching TV

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
“As you know, I have always defended the view that there is no more stupid a people than the )ewish people, ..certainly there is no more unprincipled and more unscrupulous either.” Adolf Hitler

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Warren Balough has a freedom of assembly suit in front of the Supreme Court now from Charlottesville. If that gets tossed I would say counter lawfare is futile.

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
Sky News in Britain is very liberal. GB News is our “conservative/right wing” news channel.

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
lol

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
lol

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
They do a lot of noticing

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
Only the lawyers ever win though

withey
2 hours ago
different people fit into different groups it’s a multifaceted approach

Ben
2 hours ago
$3.00
Hello Thomas. To touch on what you said on the issue of left vs right, do you think that the association of far right politics with anti-female sentiment is harmful to white nationalism in terms of attracting young white women to the movement? Anti-whites seem to have a grip on that demographic.

1
0

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
The first country to do this will start a domino effect. Pretty sure it will not be the US tho.

withey
2 hours ago
good evening all 14/88 28

@Evola19
2 hours ago
this is so good

the woodlander
2 hours ago
thomas gets it

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Bus lanes are great public transportation but they will still suck.

the woodlander
2 hours ago
take the land, then the villages, build businesses, the citys will come..

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Buses in the US suck for the most part.

@Joesmith
2 hours ago

@Totenkopfelite
i was working with someone who use to be in BM

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago

@Joesmith
the wearing of BM badge or a Sunwheel badge day in day out

Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
Most American bus drivers are rude and obviously hate driving, ironically.

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
I don’t see that working in the US.

@Joesmith
2 hours ago

@Totenkopfelite
how that happen

@Daniel
2 hours ago
sweet haha

@Totenkopfelite
2 hours ago
I got banned from my local bus service for my political views

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago
putting me to shame

@BlackPigeonPilled
2 hours ago

@Visi
o/

@Joesmith
2 hours ago
i dont wanna work at the moment i get 2k pm and my rent is only 600 pm

Reclaim
2 hours ago
Tom is a real inspirational leader

GreatWorks
2 hours ago
$100.00
Thank you Mark for networking between Nationalists in the Commonwealth. I think the UK may fall but we’re still all in this together CA, AUS/NZ, UK, IR and the US to a lesser extent. In my opinion the US is so opposed to us ideologically, it will always oppose Commonwealth unity.

1
0
Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
No RacialSeparatists were wounded on 911.

@Spectromancer
2 hours ago
Abos are cool tho. They can sleep naked in freezing weather that would kill us.

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
US infrastructure is crumbling. It might just go down some day even without help. California is going to be a shitshow.

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
The Antipodes refuse to be gasslit

Ethno Nationalist
3 hours ago
That’s a great answer from Thomas

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
Australians I imagine still have a dim view of abos, apparently they’re worse than blacks in terms of IQ.

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
Fascism was a movement to save Europe from communism. Though thanks to today’s media almost everyone thinks that fascism is something horrible.

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
He started the White student union at Towson where I also went to school and I thought it was great. No idea he would go Commie

Brosey
3 hours ago
the beauty of white culture is vitalizing

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
I don’t see a political solution for the US. I think it will just collapse.

@Joesmith
3 hours ago
14

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
Matt use to team with Jared Taylor on two team debates. Jared must regret that

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago

@Yagoda
letters of light

The Sasquatch
3 hours ago
thomas is right

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
Matt Heimbach used to be on Radio Albion

@BlackwaterPark
3 hours ago

@Spectromancer
Many such cases. Almost time to start prepping.

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Really? Interesting.

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Heimbach is running for mayor of JeewYorkShitty.

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
If the power goes out in London it will be pretty epic.

Brosey
3 hours ago
yes… i really like this train of thought

the woodlander
3 hours ago
build the community first

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Heimbach went the way of Richard Spencer I think.

Stan1
3 hours ago
$25.00
Great show, great guest. Here in Britain, we recently had a former Government advisor stating that a future Civil War is a real possibility. Is that the same possibility for Oz, and will the dystopia of Mad Max become a real scenario?

1
0

@Daniel
3 hours ago
the fat cunt turned Commie

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
Whatever happened to Matt Heimbach?

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Yeah it comes down to pro white speech.

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
free speech these days always is whether NS is allowed openly.

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
India never banned Anglin.

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Probably just about anywhere does these days.

@UltimateTruth
3 hours ago
The truth is their greatest enemy. Their entire system is built on lies, censorship and childish appeals to emotion

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago

@Spectromancer
unironically true

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
China has more free speech than the UK

DerCherusker
3 hours ago
$5.00
Good episode and powerful takes.

1
0

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
India has more free speech than the UK.

NadaK
3 hours ago
test

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
Is the electoral route i australia, like here?

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Ireland has far more free speech than the UK as well. (for the time being anyway).

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
I think Matt Heimbach killed anything remotely NS in the US.

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Why is Blair not in the NSN anyway?

Callaghan
3 hours ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
good work 0/

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
0.01
Is Australia the only place in the Anglosphere where you can be openly NS?

The Sasquatch
3 hours ago
what a shocking state of affairs

@Daniel
3 hours ago
KMac’s Wiki article is ridiculous

Joe Marsh
3 hours ago
We started protesting the drag queen caper

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
Evening Chief

@Loke
3 hours ago

@Ral9010NatSoc
German wiki is a trash fire of denunciation, it is unusable for anything but science free of economic interests

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
We had snipers on the library roof in Spokane PROTECTING Drag Queen Story Hour.

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
Cultural pride will overcome this leftist conditioning.

@Mike
3 hours ago
\o

Chief Moody
3 hours ago
Evening troops

Vettekid1488
3 hours ago
to increase demand and therefore tuition fees

Callaghan
3 hours ago

@vettekid407
0/

Carnegie
3 hours ago
I’ve been watching Australian walking tour videos and there are so many jeets.

Vettekid1488
3 hours ago
that’s insane

Ethno Nationalist
3 hours ago

@MarkCollett
DLIVE DOWN

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Well we control zero media outlets commenting is the best we can do.

Callaghan
3 hours ago
holy shit that many…

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth.” Goebbels

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 hours ago

@Loke
According to Wiki, Cultural Marxism is a Far Right anti-semitic conspiracy theory.

@LeighStewy
3 hours ago
yes!

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
I deleted my Twatter.

@UltimateTruth
3 hours ago

@daniel
Great idea

Callaghan
3 hours ago
Come Back Fraser Anning

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Supporting the USSR over Germany was a war crime.

@Daniel
3 hours ago
We need to spam the crap out of Rupert Lowe’s Twitter with JQ stuff

@Loke
3 hours ago
What does Thomas think about his wikipedia article? Wiki is a character assassination tool targeting dissidents of all stripes.

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Favouring SatanicJeews over Christian Germany was offensively Foul. Sad.

@Evola19
3 hours ago
overton window ohhh its moving I can feel it moving boyos

@robert1184
3 hours ago
Hi im here from Dlive the stream is gone there

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
gtsy woody

Callaghan
3 hours ago
TRUE BLUE CREW

@UltimateTruth
3 hours ago
Trump and Musk are servants of Zionist Jewish global power. The kosher right wing. They are not genuine dissidents. They are the establishment

the woodlander
3 hours ago

@BlackPigeonPilled
mate

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 hours ago
based Sewell

@Daniel
3 hours ago
50% of Twitter now is still people talking about the Js

@Mike
3 hours ago

@LeighStewy
same, its sad, we have Jeremy MacKenzie and Diagolon, who are awesome, but we need Jacob, Tom and Joel

@Glen19
3 hours ago

@noreplacement

@UltimateTruth
They defunded Antifa & BLM because they were on the wrong side of the Palestine issue. The money is on the right now. Which appears to be more effective considering how many people are getting on board

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Petition Musk to abide by FCC regulations, instead of censoring the most pertinent posters.

Callaghan
3 hours ago
14

@Evola19
3 hours ago
THOMAS TOP LAD

the woodlander
3 hours ago
frens

@UltimateTruth
3 hours ago

@Glen19
Spot on! Left/right is largely a kosher sandwich

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
Conservatives are basically leftist with a twist in that they see something is very wrong but don’t go where the root causes are out of cowardice

@noreplacement
3 hours ago

@Glen19
I agree. Left/Right is a distraction. The real conflict is between Nationalists and internationalists

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Jeremy MacKenzie is pretty good on podcasts

Makethemsayoyvey
3 hours ago
jews control the left and the right. a 3rd position is the answer

@LeighStewy
3 hours ago
I wish Canada had leaders like Collett and Sewell

Australianglo
3 hours ago
try not to talk about British police Challenge: Impossible

Makethemsayoyvey
3 hours ago

@movementhistory
i fully agree

@Mike
3 hours ago
i was wondering when you were gonna have Tom on, good stuff Mark

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Dieversity defeats Nations.

@Glen19
3 hours ago
Thinking about politics in terms of left & right is the incorrect approach

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
I’ll give the Left credit in that they have done a great job at taking over institutions and media

Movement History
3 hours ago
0.02
Professional talkers are internet-nerds are a big problem! All they do is sit online and complain and do nothing irl – even worse, they downtalk doing things in the REAL WORLD. They want you to sit online infront of the computer…

Kevin
3 hours ago
Trump wants “legal immigration”

@NewJigger
3 hours ago
The trump team is using the pro White agenda as cover for the tribes interests, that way the backlash is directed at us

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
T S is a good speaker

@haraldr1984
3 hours ago
Hail Sewell

Makethemsayoyvey
3 hours ago
Thomas and Mark o//

Kevin
3 hours ago
Jordan Peterson ?

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Comments on Zerohedge are hilarious.

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
Ultimately it is obviously degenerate

Movement History
3 hours ago
Long live Thomas Sewell and the NSN!

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
When I was young, what was classed as porn, would be shown on TV now.

the woodlander
3 hours ago
spot on… build the vanguard, power will come later..

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
Women are really into checking it out.

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
“A spanner in the works and sugar in the petrol tank of Democracy goes more to bring about its breakdown than battling for the ballot box.” Colin Jordan. For more info on British Movement membership, news, merchandise etc email sunwheelteam@gmail.com

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Seeing huge shifts in attitudes online but not IRL

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Women watching porn is a newer thing.

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago

@Spectromancer
I read that the vast majority of people have watch pornography at some point in their life

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
I’m not seeing much in the US. The problem I think is that it’s too easy to move into the country and get away.

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Tranny nonsense is so 2021

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Pornography seems to get a free speech pass.

charlesgerety1
3 hours ago
We are entering the mainstream consciousness more and more so there’s definitely progress being made

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@Daniel
it’s the pioneering spirit. they are the descendents of explorers and colonialists.

@Daniel
3 hours ago
So different approaches are called for

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Aussies are more high-T than British people

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
I’m very impressed with Mark and PA.

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
This sort of direct protesting is very effective. That’s why the UK state will class any group doing it as terrorist

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
The UK has an advantage because they are a distinct ethnicity. “Whiteness” is kinda hard to rally around.

@TheGreatWillDo
3 hours ago
the woodlander & callaghan in the house !!!

@LeighStewy
3 hours ago
Thank you Mark for interviewing Sewell!

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
GLR’s assassination was likely a CIA MKultra op.

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Wish Tom could speak at a PA conference but doubt they’d let him into the country

Kevin
3 hours ago
Trump will do what he’s told by the 4x2s

Callaghan
3 hours ago
WHITE POWER 0/

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
“Being prepared is one of the great secrets of living.” GLR

@LeighStewy
3 hours ago
yoooo LFG

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Trump lacks the Balls to ban Dildos, much less to ban Pornography. Trump is ProDildo until he proves otherwise.

the woodlander
3 hours ago
evening everyone

Reclaim
3 hours ago
White men with pronounced mustaches will lead the way

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Most americans are not affected enough to get off their asses.

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
If they can sue you they win, you have to navigate the legal minefield.

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 hours ago
$14.88
Thomas, are there billions of Indians attending their weird water purifying ceremony in heaven?

1
0

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
I think what happened with that Patriotic Talk show, was someone didn’t warn the guest about the laws in Britain beforehand…

@TonyChurchill
3 hours ago
That cup is being tickled by the stash

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
No such thing as a pornstar.

Reclaim
3 hours ago
We are living through a mud flood

MTaylor
3 hours ago
Is Mark interviewing a pornstar?

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
Is Martin Luther illegal in the UK yet?

@Daniel
3 hours ago
NSN = best group in the Anglosphere

@Ihtultu
3 hours ago
well said Thomas.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
Mark and Tom together is great! its been a long time coming.

@TonyChurchill
3 hours ago
“it surrounds us. It penetrates us. Mmm”

LenGray
3 hours ago
Jason K is giving out lots atm

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 hours ago
Evening Gents. \o

@Spectromancer
3 hours ago
The US is majority German ethnically going on hispanic now. Suppressing The Bund was critical to starting WWII.

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Parliament is a battle of minds.

The Resident Baker
3 hours ago
Evening everyone

Stan1
3 hours ago
Indeed

@Daniel
3 hours ago
The Joel and Blair Show isn’t the same without Tom

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@Glen19
no, that was Charlie Big Potatoes. He got jailed for sharing links containing thousands of books, and a few were illegal.

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Apparently Australia is more British than Britain by percentage of population.

WP Combat
3 hours ago
Sewell with the Don Frye tash o/

Ethno Nationalist
3 hours ago
Good evening, Mark Thomas and chat 1488 o/

@Daniel
3 hours ago

@Glen19
No

Stan1
3 hours ago
Welcome Thomas o/

@Glen19
3 hours ago

@Daniel
Didn’t someone end up in jail because of that episode?

@Daniel
3 hours ago
Thomas Sewell on Patriotic Talk the other year was EPIC lmao

@TheGreatWillDo
3 hours ago
THE TASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Carnival Barker
3 hours ago
Good evening gentlemen.

@potato7
3 hours ago
o/

@TheGreatWillDo
3 hours ago
sewell’s first time on a stream with mark…? ever..

@DissidentThoughts
3 hours ago
o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
Joel is doing great work

Stan1
3 hours ago

@SerenaJB
Evening SB

@TheGreatWillDo
3 hours ago

@Totenkopfelite
lol like ht’s

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
He knows your intro is too long !

@SerenaJB
3 hours ago
Good evening!

Kevin
3 hours ago
Mark is probably telling Sewell not to fedpost

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
Looking forward to this

Kevin
3 hours ago
o/

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
Starfield team \o/

Callaghan
3 hours ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

@Ihtultu
3 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

Eagle Pax Max
3 hours ago
o/

Northern Blue
3 hours ago
Up the Aussies

Northern Blue
3 hours ago
Wow Massive name. Let’s go

@Totenkopfelite
3 hours ago
828 \o

Stan1
3 hours ago
Hail Thomas o/ Hail to our Australian cousins

@TheGreatWillDo
3 hours ago
Who did the tash better farage or sewell…????

@TheGreatWillDo
4 hours ago
Imagine PA flying in sewell & doing a conference in his home town of dagenham.. YOU CAN TAKE THE BOY OUT OF DAGENHAM BUT YOU CANT TAKE DAGENHAM OUT OF THE BOY!!!! WELCOME HOME

DerCherusker
4 hours ago
Hail!

SwedishKillerChef
4 hours ago
o/

@BMC1488
5 hours ago
WFP! o/

Question EVERYTHING!
7 hours ago
Oh Hi Mark!

@SpaceMan
10 hours ago
what am i doing here

WP Combat
12 hours ago
Whilst we are waiting for tonights stream, here is one for my Australian brothers
Jake Lam vs Derek Cheng Eternal MMA 94
Jake Lam vs Derek Cheng Eternal MMA 94
WP Combat : Jake Lam vs Derek Cheng Eternal MMA 94
More

@filled_soda
12 hours ago
Oh, hell yeah

@WhiteZealot
13 hours ago
o/

The Pork Report
20 hours ago
Hail Thomas Sewell o/

King Tut
23 hours ago
nice to see TS on PA. hopefully he’ll clear up all of the misunderstandings between him and Mark!

@BMC1488
1 day ago
Hail the NSN, Hail Thomas Sewell! o///

WP Combat
1 day ago
Hail Thomas Sewell o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript