Thomas Sewell: Alrighty, we’re live. Max volume, everything. Audio input, capture.

 

All right, testing, 1, 2, 3. Use my big boy voice. Volume’s low. What’s your problem? I actually found a setting. Everyone’s like, Tom, fix your settings. We’re going 150%. There we go. Alrighty. Alrighty. Testing, testing!

 

All right, obligatory, free Joel Davis! Free Brandon [Koschel]! Free Jim Roberts!

 

So I’m going to cover a few subjects today, as you expect, with a solo stream. I really enjoyed my most recent stream with James Mason. It was like a five hour don’t Fed post challenge hard. He Fed posted a couple times, but as you’d expect. But I reviewed it and it wouldn’t breach. It wouldn’t breach even the most ridiculous laws we have here in Australia.

 

Now, one thing that I need to correct from the stream is I think I said that the book Siege is in a grey area of the law. My lawyer has told me that it is potentially banned. So he was like, it’s kind of in a dark grey area of the law. It’s not 100% banned. There is a banned list of books in Australia and Siege isn’t on it. But I cannot encourage anyone to go and buy that book because they haven’t made the case yet.

 

But what he suggests is that they’re trying to make the case. So I’d be very careful with that book in Australia. That’s one thing I want to clarify. Yeah, I think Mason gave a pretty sound explanation of what his intention of the book is. And I’m surprised that there hasn’t been any negative press because I know the journalists will watch a stream like that and get their AI ready to write an article for them about how evil we all are. But, yeah, that hasn’t happened.

 

But I do want to give people caution here in Australia that, yeah, I’m not encouraging you on legal grounds. I’m not encouraging you to read the book.

 

And I think all I said in the stream was that I did read it back in 2019 after being bullied by Jacob Hersant into reading it. I originally didn’t read it because I thought it was what everyone says it is. And I was like:

 

“I’m not really interested in that. I know enough about X, Y and Z through reading army manuals when I was in the army, so I don’t feel the need to read something of that nature.”

 

And then Jacob was like:

 

“No, it’s. That’s not what it’s about at all! There’s like some contentious lines in it. But overall, that’s not what it says.”

 

And Mason clarified that on stream. And I do appreciate him doing that because I think siege culture and accelerationist culture is really misunderstood. You know, accelerationism as a concept is, and siege as a concept is really misunderstood. And you’ll notice when I said to Mason about how our strategy has been to do the maximal amount of work with the minimal amount of damage, you’ll notice he was nodding the most. Mason’s not advocating for anyone to be an idiot and go to jail. He’s actually advocating the opposite. He’s saying:

 

“Do as much as you can to the integrity of the system without ruining your life!”

 

And he is proof that he’s done 60 years in the struggle. 60 years of inspiring people to be like:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this system is evil and corrupt and contributing to it and trying to seek entry into it in hopes to change it is not an effective strategy.”

 

And he’s always been an advocate of the opposite. To siege it, to besiege it, to starve it. And yeah there’s no point, you know, running at it, doing a hero run, you know, charging at the castle walls, you’re just going to get pinged by some dude with an arrow. You’ve got to just wait it out, you’ve got to siege it, not wait it out and do nothing. But there’s a lot of things you can do while besieging an enemy.

 

And so people have to think creatively about what that means. And not but again, all politics, all politics, when it is in its infancy, attracts radical people. And radical people are more prone to self destructive behaviour. And so you want to have people that are courageous, you want to have courageous men, you want to have courageous leaders. And courageous does not mean foolish!

 

And so you do have to balance the concepts of bravery and courage with patience. And there’s a lot of virtue, a lot of virtue in having the strength to put yourself against a system that’s destroying you without becoming a martyr, you know, without letting the system destroy you. Now if you step over that line and the system puts you in jail for life or you get assassinated, like George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

I mean, Matt Hale, for example, who was involved, my understanding, with the creativity movement, he wasn’t the founder, but he was like the young hotshot that was rising up. And I think he’s in jail for life. I think he gets out of jail in about 10 years time from now. And he’s been in jail for like 20 years. Guys like Matt Howell, for example, just got really unlucky. They got. He got really unlucky and he got caught up in something that he hadn’t. I’ve looked at the case, I’ve looked at the case, the facts of the case, and the guy hasn’t done anything wrong. They could just. He was just a serious threat to the system and something like that could happen to me. But God willing, I’m safe from that level of corruption!

 

[07:42]

 

And I think it might be good luck, it might just be good luck! It might be destiny. But you don’t, what is it? You don’t count your chickens until they come home to roost or something? It’s still early days. It’s very early days. I’m still a young man. I might be bald, but I’m young and fit.

 

So, yeah, it’s, I’m 33 years old this year as of this month. And yeah, there’s a lot of struggle to go.

 

Just open with that if you haven’t checked it out, don’t be intimidated by the fact that it’s five hours. It is broken down into separate conversations. There’s an hour and then there’s a break and then there was meant to be an another hour and a break. But it, the first hour, the first two hours is very consumable for most people.

 

And then obviously, if you’re really into this stuff and you go for long drives and, or you work a job where you can have a, your headphones in a lot of tradies and stuff. Tell me that they like the five hour streams. Don’t be intimidated by having these really long streams. They appreciate, they appreciate the dialogue.

 

So as long as not too often. I don’t think you should listen to streams every day and I don’t think you should listen to music every day. I have been doing a fair bit of community service. I got to do knitting, as you’re all aware, and I advise people not to, I listen to music sometimes the whole time, or a podcast or an audio book. Books are probably the best thing. Books are better than streams because books, streams and dialogue and conversations aren’t as sharp. There’s no way I can communicate with you as clearly and as sharply as, say, reading Mein Kampf on audiobook. It’s not possible because of all the jargon. Those are the clearest thoughts possible. And then they go through an editing process.

 

So where are we? So already in the chat. Already in the chat! They’re arguing about Christianity already. Instantly! It’s incredible! Christianity will come up in this stream. When we talk about Manosphere, we’re going to cover feminism in general. We’re going to talk about all this girl bossing that’s going on at the moment with the Evangelicals. And there’s some heinous stuff that I’ve seen on Twitter where these little soy boy freaks are marrying these goblina jewesses with like 100 body counts. And they’re just saying:

 

“But she’s saved by Christ!”

 

And so it will come up. The conversation will come up. When we’re talking about that. There is definitely part one of this stream. What I’m going to open with is I’ll just. People still saying the volume’s low. Let me just unmute myself. Hold on. Now we’re. I could put up 175. I’ll just go 200. I’ll go 200. Okay. People still complaining. 200%. 200% Audio input, capture, volume. And the mic is like an inch from my face, maybe two. Two inches. Audio input, capture. I’ll put this one at 150. Alrighty. How does that sound? Testing for the last time. Testing. Yeah, fair enough. It is pretty quiet. Yeah, there’s a lot of retards in the chat today. Classic. Everyone’s spurging out. Yeah, that does sound better.

 

All right, sweet. Everyone’s arguing over which strain of Christianity. It’s incredible! It’s incredible! It’s endless. It’s endless, isn’t it? It never ends. It never ends.

 

So to start with the Aboriginal question. So obviously we are still what I am, and I have friends and we are trying to get a political party on the table here in Australia. And so covering the Aboriginal question, and you could call it the woman question, is really important. And it has to be done in a way that’s legal because of these laws here in Australia. And it has to be done in a way that people can understand the values and the rhetoric without getting caught up in the emotional arguments. So one has to be cautious when they approach these two topics. So you might find my speech slightly more refined than normal.

 

Hitler won the female vote in Germany. He actually had more women vote for him than men. And that’s a really interesting phenomenon to consider that more women voted for Hitler than men.

 

And so it shows that women don’t have to necessarily like you in order to respect you and I think that’s an important dynamic. A lot of people have commented, including Mason, about how journalists have behaved, female journalists specifically have behaved when interviewing me. And I saw someone online describe it as “negative tingles”, that they’re not used to someone outside the court giving them negative tingles. Normally it’s boring. Normally their job is boring. And then to have someone that’s got an intense character and an intense personality, it hits the dopamine receptors differently. And I’ve seen grandmas on Facebook comment sections in replies to these interviews saying, “hail Australia”. And all the criticism and all the advice people try to give us over the years is all wrong. It’s all backwards. It’s actually all the other way around. The female question is the opposite of the current orthodoxy, the current belief system of how women should be treated and how politics affects women. It’s all wrong. It’s all an inversion of the truth!

 

The truth is that it comes down to respect! And they respect integrity, not niceties! They don’t respect niceties, they respect integrity. And they respect aggression as long as it’s a as long as it’s not a foolish, foaming at the mouth, barbaric aggression. They don’t have much respect for that, but they almost respect that more and get better tingles from that than Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese. These characters provide no stimulation to the female political psyche. And so understanding how to win the woman vote, you’re not going to win it with outright misogyny. That’s obviously ridiculous! This idea of just be a prick and you’ll get voted in. That’s not what I’m articulating.

 

[16:04]

 

What I’m saying is that people should not continue to spread the lie and demoralisation within our broader scene, our broader movement and political parties in the West, that the way to win the woman vote is to pander to them. That’s really what this comes down to, is the pandering.

 

So that’s a subject on its own that I’ll cover. So that’s what you got to look forward to.

 

But first we’re going to talk about the Aboriginal question and specific. We’ve talked about both these questions a lot, but the reason why it’s come up again is I’ve had a lot of people in person and online message me saying:

 

“Why is our strategy to go to war with Aboriginals? Won’t we win more votes and won’t we do better in Parliament and won’t our message be more well received if we don’t go to war?”

 

These are their words, not mine, with Aboriginals. And my position is not that we’re going to war with Aboriginals.

 

And obviously the Camp Sovereignty situation has played a part in this dialogue because people think that the reason why there’s allegedly an incident on that hill was because of the Aboriginal question. And it’s completely it’s not irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant, but people are conflating and the media has done this. The media has purposefully misled people and made a significant portion of people that support us question their support on the basis of:

 

“Well, why would they attack innocent elderly Aboriginal women?”

 

And most people can see through it. But there is a portion of our supporters that are like:

 

“Oh, I don’t think that was a good move. You probably shouldn’t have attacked innocent elderly Aboriginal women.”

 

And it’s, well, one, that didn’t happen and two, the conflict., … And this is the position that interestingly, a lot of Aboriginals actually share, not all, but a lot, is that the issue is these White traitors.

 

And so if these White traitors didn’t behave the way they did, there wouldn’t be as much conflict between the Whites and the Aboriginals. And you’ll find there’s a lot of, probably a higher percentage of Aboriginal DNA Aboriginals that aren’t supportive of multiculturalism. And there is, the Left call it like an Uncle Tom syndrome, obviously. But my position has always been towards all races that it’s about respect. And it’s a zero sum game a lot of the time regarding resources and living space. That’s zero sum.

 

And so there’s going to have to be compromise or there’s going to be if there’s not some sort of what I’ve always said about the question of re-migration is people bring up the Aboriginals, whenever you talk about re-migration they say:

 

“Oh, but what about the Aboriginals? They were here before you!”

 

So because of that, they’re in their own select category. And what I’ve been trying to explain to people online is that Aboriginals have a choice. And this is the sound bite and this is what you should be saying to if I know a lot of people have an Aboriginal friend, or a part Aboriginal friend, this is what you say to them:

 

“Our position is that you either have part sovereignty over the whole or over full sovereignty over the part. But you can’t have both.”

 

I’ll explain that again. The Aboriginal people can either have part sovereignty over all, or full sovereignty over part. They can’t have both! That’s not a compromise. That’s White genocide. So White people, Anglo, Celtic people predominantly have come to this continent because the continent wasn’t a country, or a nation, it was a continent. It’s a land mass. It’s an island, a big island.

 

But we’ve come to this place. There’s a whole bunch of warring Aboriginal tribes. Some are in cahoots and some aren’t in cahoots. Some have been here 10,000 years. Some have potentially been here 40,000 years. The numbers keep changing. But either way, we came here and we built something separate to them. We tried to include them. There’s a lot of interesting history from the first and Second Fleet and from Arthur and Bligh, Philip. There’s some interesting history where they’ve tried to integrate the Aboriginals and it’s almost always backfired horribly on both the Whites and on the Aboriginals.

 

And so when you look at and Auspill’s done a very good job at covering this, when there has been massacres of Aboriginals, so-called these genocides or massacres, it’s always come down to establishing the Anglo Saxon law on the land. It’s come down to:

 

“Hey, we want this land, we want this territory. We’re bigger and stronger than you. We’re not going to come after you, we’re not going to attack you. But we want this much space. And, it’s living space for Whites. Europe has to breathe out. We’re overcrowded in the streets of London. We’ve got this problem with criminals or petty criminality, people stealing Spoons and stuff. We’re running out of space. We found this place. We’re in a geopolitical issue with all these other people. We can’t explain this to you. We just need what we, what we need. And we’re prepared to fight for it! And your options are to fight us or to just keep moving deeper and deeper into the bush and away from this spot. It’s ours now. You’re not having it back.”

 

[22:11]

 

And obviously anyone in their right mind would be pissed off by that. If some alien force came, you know, from space and did that to us right now and we had really little ability to fight back because they were so technologically advanced, we would rightfully be pissed off, wouldn’t we? But we would have to retreat into the bush, we would have to White flight. We would have to be like, this is too much. We have to consolidate what we’re doing.

 

And so this is beyond Good and Evil. This is a, this is Nietzschean in this concept. The Left try to put a moral framework on that and say:

 

“That’s wrong, that’s evil. And therefore we have to surrender Australia to everyone! We have to be cucks, we have to bend over and we have to let anyone come here and rape us because of this founding moment!”

 

Because White people equals bad as their moral framework. That is their entire moral framework. White people equals bad. And they’ve got this original sin concept:

 

“We’re bad people! We’re horrible people! We’re horrible, bad people!”

 

Now, obviously straight White men don’t think this way. The only people that think this way are people with slave morality, which is homosexuals, freaks, a lot of women unfortunately think this way:

 

“Oh, no, we’re horrible! What we’ve done is so horrible!”

 

You know, this kind of bleeding heart. Not all women, but it is a naturally, it is a feminine energy to put your empathy for others. Well, it’s not even a, it’s a distortion of feminine energy really.

 

But look, it appeals, it appeals to weak willed people. Masculine men don’t think like this. Testosterone doesn’t allow your brain to even go there. We’ve got a completely different philosophical structure, a completely different reality because we’ve got a solar morality. It really comes down to these simple principles. It’s not about good and evil, it’s about solar morality. It’s about, we are a life form, we must exist, we must continue to exist. We don’t have to be pricks about it, we don’t have to be cunts about it. But we’re not going to back down, we’re not going to surrender, we’re not going to roll over and die. And so how do we make this work?

 

And so obviously, while we’re in a nice friendly talking phase about it, I don’t have an issue with Aboriginal sovereignty. It’s not my issue. I don’t. Good on them, Good for them. That’s my position on the Aboriginals. Good for them! If they can have it, good on them.

 

But it’s got nothing to do with me. I’m not paying for it, I’m not engaged in it, I’m not involved in it. It’s not in my face, it’s not in my place, it’s not in my space. It’s in their space. Now that is the problem! That is the problem is that multiculturalism is forcing all these radically different people to live together. And we’re not meant to live that is going to be the death of us. It’s going to be the death of our culture.

 

Now these people, they have a flag, they have a tribe, they have an identity. They’re trying to rebuild their culture. Good on them. My opinion, and I think the opinion of most Aboriginals and most White people is that they should do it on their own! I think they’ve had enough help. We’ve done enough to help them, more than enough to help them. It’s not our responsibility to help them any further.

 

What part of the land are they going to get? Well, that is the most serious conversation. But the philosophy behind that conversation I think is congruent. I think we can, I think all Australians can get on board with the idea that we have a two-state solution, at a minimum. To me, that’s the minimum. If they want to go to war with us, that’s a different conversation.

 

But I think you’ll find that there could be conversations where they have their own government, they have their own schools, they have their own institutions. Are they going to be as good as ours? No, they’re not. Is that going to cause the bleeding hearts to be like:

 

“See we’re still continuing to oppress them by keeping them separate!”

 

And there’ll be an anti-apartheid argument, but apartheid is the most beneficial thing for both parties. Because they will never have dignity, they will never have sovereignty and they will never have dignity while we play this passive aggressive game where they’re trying to rule over us and we’re trying to say we’re all friends, Kumbaya. That is never, while both of us are actually suffering. So I’ve said in the past things like if they want to, if they want to fight, they might get deported too. They’ll get deported back to India. They walked here 40,000 years ago. They might get told to walk back.

 

And I’ve said things like those are very strong comments and obviously a lot of Aboriginal people want to fight me because of those comments.

 

But that is my position. I’m not backing down on that. I’m never going to change my mind on that is my position. It’s a two-state solution or it’s that because we cannot continue. And when we take power in this country, and we are going to take power in this country, we are going to solve this question and we are going to say:

 

“Let’s sit down, let’s draw up the map and here is a fundamental treaty of you will not let China put bases on your land, you will not let any foreigners put bases on your land, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Like there will be a treaty that will say:

 

“You are a vassal of our realm. This is Australdom, this is our realm, you’re a vassal, you’ve got a territory, you self govern it.”

 

Whether we trade or buy or sell or communicate with each other, whether there’s tourist visas, all this is downstream. We can work something out where they can come visit us and we can go visit them.

 

[28:08]

 

The bleeding hearts can go live with the Aboriginals. But you will not put Chinese bases on it. Like this is fortress Australia. We’re not going to tolerate it and you guys can police yourselves. You can have your own laws, you can have your own courts, you can have your own koori justice and your own jails and your own prisons, and all the complaints that they have all solved overnight. All solved overnight. We have nothing to do with it. We have nothing to do with it. We have no part of it! You want to go spear each other, that’s your culture. That we’re not going to intervene. And that is the absolute best outcome for everyone involved! That it’s the best compromise for us. Certainly it’s the best compromise. Is it perfect? Is it ideal? Can we purity spiral and get a better result? Sure, absolutely!

 

Is that feasible? Of course, anything is feasible if you put your mind to it. Is that how the Australian public feel? No, the Australian public don’t feel that there could be something more than that. There might be people that want to do more than that and go further, certainly. And that ethnic tension arises from living together. But I think once you find, once you take that step in that direction, I think you will find that tension will disappear.

 

So when people say to me:

 

“Tom you know why are we doing this? Anti Aboriginal rhetoric and da, da and we should try to win the Aboriginals over and we should., …”

 

The way they’re talking is they’re treating Aboriginals the same way. They’re like:

 

“We should try to win women over. We should try to win!”

 

It’s kind of similar to attitude. It’s like that’s not how it works. You don’t win Aboriginals over by pandering to them. You don’t win women over by pandering to them. I know they’re two very different biological forms. You know, obviously one is male and female. One is just female. You know, when we’re talking about women, we’re talking about White women, obviously. And I’m not making any further comparisons in that regard.

 

But if you understand, what I’m saying is the politics of the White man, the politics of the White Patriarchy, is not about pandering! Our politics is about laying down the law, explaining what we’re going to do and why we’re going to do it and how we’re going to do it. And then saying:

 

“This is the best outcome for everyone. What we’re doing right now is not working and we’re not making any further compromises on that’s the line in the sand.”

 

We’re actually only going to go further than that, we’re not going to come any less than that.

 

There is never, in my opinion, there’s never going to be a time where I or the vast majority of White people in Australia are going to accept are our slow ethnic replacement. It might appear that way right now, but it’s only because we’re not politically organised. This is not how the average Australian feels. This is not how the average White person around the world feels. The average White person around the world wants re-migration. They want to remain, at a minimum, 90%. That’s like the beginning. That’s not even, like controversial anymore, that the 90% or the 95% rule. That is the super majority of the population. I just like deport all of them except the good ones. That’s the super majority. And then you’ve probably still got the majority saying:

 

“No, no, it shouldn’t be 90, it should be 99%.”

 

So, yeah, anyway, I’ll pause there. I won’t cover that subject much more. Oh, my God! There’s a sorry, there’s a spastic in the chat. How do I do ban this person for life? I don’t want to mute. I keep making this mistake. If I mute, then I can’t ban. Isn’t that right? Okay, that just deleted it. Oh, yeah. Also muting on Rumble because Odysee is different. Muting on Rumble is banning. Cool. Glad we got that sorted.

 

I’ll go through the comments section. If there’s any comments on the Aboriginal question. Geez, everyone’s just arguing about Christianity. We’re not even talking about Christianity. We’re just talking about Aboriginals at this stage.

 

So, yeah, in short, as I said before, tell your friends that say this nonsense to you about how we should work together:

 

“We all got to work together. We all got to work together.”

 

They can have full sovereignty over themselves, but not us. Or they can have this fake sovereignty over everyone. Do they actually want full sovereignty? If they do, it can only be over themselves. That means apartheid. Ultimately, that means apartheid. What that looks like is a man can’t serve the Australian flag and the Aboriginal flag. You can’t go to a at the high school, at the courts, all these institutions. It’s got an Australian flag and it’s got an Aboriginal flag. That is not sustainable. It’s one or the other. It can’t be both.

 

And this idea of:

 

“Oh, we got to show solidarity and they’re not a threat to us and all this.”

 

It’s not sustainable. It’s not sustainable. It’s nice. Tingle feels. It feels really nice:

 

“Oh, look, I’m being empathetic. Oh, I’m a good person.”

 

You can have this virtue signaling, but we’re two very different peoples. We need to have sovereignty over ourselves. They need to have sovereignty over themselves. We need to be focused on Australia and White people and civilisation, the Western civilisation that we’re a part of, and they need to be focused on creating their own harmony, the dream time, their version of reality, fixing their problems, punishing their problems. They have a completely different version of reality to us. That is just how different ethnic groups and different races are built. They have different versions of reality. Things we see as a problem that they see it like a major problem, they see as a minor problem, and vice versa. Their biggest issue is White people are locking them up and putting them in jail. Like, they can’t even comprehend that our problem is that they’re committing heinous crimes. They can’t even comprehend that’s a problem. They see the problem as:

 

“Why are you locking us up?”

 

[35:04]

 

It’s the same with the blacks in America. How can these two groups of people live together when they have completely different versions of reality? So they should police themselves. Simple as! Part sovereignty over all or full sovereignty over part.

 

So you can’t have both. Simple. As I’ll move on. Hopefully the comment section is not talking about Christianity, someone says:

 

“Do I make my own toothpaste?”

 

Very funny. Yeah. And this applies not just to Australia, this applies to obviously, Canada and New Zealand as well. I think the Treaty of Waitangi is a mistake in New Zealand. I don’t know too much about the treaties in Canada. I know Alex Ferryman does. Yeah, it’s a mistake. It’s a mistake. Any treaty that exists needs to be a treaty of:

 

“Here’s your space. Here’s our space. You live there, we live here. You’re citizens of your country. We’re citizens of our country. We’re two separate nations. We’re not the same nation.”

 

They even call themselves the first nation so that by definition, they’re not part of our nation. They’re saying this. They’re saying this, not me. They are saying it. What else?

 

Let’s get into the nuts and bolts. The woman question. I need a need a breather. If we’re going to get into the woman question. I need a breather. Yeah. Someone says:

 

“Easiest solution is allow those same bleeding hearts to transfer their own funds to Aboriginals, not government or social funds. The Left can put their money where their mouth is.”

 

Yeah, absolutely! Well, I believe that all the bleeding hearts should go live with the Aboriginals. They should have Aboriginal citizenship. They want to be so bad. They hate White people so much. They hate being White!:

 

“White people are horrible, horrible people! And having White children is perpetuating White supremacy and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Good bye. Bye. See you later. Awesome! You know, we’ll strip all of these people of Australian citizenship when we come to power and there will be people that will say:

 

“Oh, my God, you can’t do that!”

 

Yes, we can and we will. They’re all going to get stripped of their Australian citizenship. These White people that work, that bow down and worship Aboriginals as their god. They can go live with their god. They can go live with their god. Simple. You know, you want to do the Welcome to Country acknowledgment of country, all this. Absolutely perfect! Perfect. Absolutely! Bye. Bye. Yeah, we don’t want those people living in our society. It doesn’t matter that they’re of the same blood as us. That doesn’t matter because they’re not of the same honour as us. They hate us! There are some sort of mutation of our bloodline that is antithetical to our existence. If Aboriginals didn’t exist, they would find some other group to nut hug. Hypothetically, because there’s no Aboriginals in England. Like you don’t see people advocating for the pre-Belgic-Celtic invasion of Bronze Age England. That doesn’t exist. You know, what kind of strain of Leftism would that be? You know, it’s obviously absurd because you’ve got a thousand years of homogeneity of many different layers of Celtic peoples then breeding in with many different layers of Germanic and Nordic peoples.

 

So it’s the English people, the British people are a relatively homogenised people. And so you don’t see that argument because those tribes can homogenise quite. I mean, obviously it still caused things like, I mean, I don’t want to get too much into the intricacies of English history, but you can see the precursor of things like civil war in previous ethnic distinctions.

 

So, for example, Croatia and Serbia are ethnically very similar, but they’re not ethnically the same. They are two different ethnicities and therefore they also have two different versions of their interpretation of Christianity. You’ve got Orthodoxy and you’ve got Catholicism. So ethnic differences play out also religiously and also politically. You’ll see this a lot through human history. You see it in the American Civil War. There was an ethnic difference in the American Civil War as well. Probably not as predominant, but I won’t go into it. Americans know that for themselves.

 

Now someone says:

 

“Tom’s right. They have a different reality. Go to any Northern Territory prison and you’ll see the system isn’t working.”

 

It’s not working by our standards. Absolutely! Our version, our reality of working and their version of working are two completely different things.

 

And I’ll finish it with this. I had a Dreamtime experience with Aboriginals. I’m sure I’ve told this story on stream years ago, so those that have been around a while will remember this story. But I had a friend in the army, a guy called Christopher Knight. He was a Special Forces guy. He’s a translator, he’s a linguist. And I don’t know what he’s doing now with his life, but I’m sure he’s doing well. And he was adopted. He got adopted in a cultural sense, or a linguistic sense by an Aboriginal. An Aboriginal tribe in Darwin in Northern Territory. And this guy was a, like one of those, what is called politician-linguist or something. This guy spoke like 50 languages. It was incredible! I’ve never seen anything like it. I mean, we would go out drinking in Mitchell street or whatever it’s called in the CBD of Darwin. It’s like one street and there’s like four bars on it. And any backpacker, he could speak their language. Any backpacker. It was really incredible!

 

[41:09]

 

Anyway on his weekends, he was going out and living with Aboriginals out in the middle of nowhere. And there were like some, there were full bloods and it’s very rare to find full bloods, but in Northern Territory it’s more common. There’s no way you can find full bloods outside of Northern Territory or Northern New, Southern Queensland or Northern WA. And he started hanging out with these, basically semi-nude Aboriginals in the bushland near Casuarina Beach on the weekends. And he knocks on my door. I don’t know, it was like one in the morning, one random. It was like a Tuesday, or a Thursday. And he says:

 

“Hey Tom or hey Sewell.”

 

Everyone calls you by your last name in the army:

 

“Hey Sewelly, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. They need a linguist. He was a two commando guy, but for some reason he was in our battalion. And he says, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. I’m getting on a plane and I have to say goodbye to some people and I had to run some errands. Can you drive me?”

 

Because I was one of the only LID, which lid means new guy or live in digger. I was one of the only LID that had a car. And I was friendly with him, and everyone thought he was a weirdo and I did as well. Weird means different things to me than it does to other people. When someone says weird, they mean like not radioactive, but they mean, you know, semi-ostracized. They mean:

 

“Oh, we don’t associate with that guy because he’s a weirdo!”

 

Whereas when someone’s weird, I am fascinated by human psychology. And so I was always very friendly with him because I wanted to know what made him tick. He had such a different version of reality to everyone else that I just really wanted to understand. I mean this guy was probably in his early 30s and I think I was 19 or 20 at the time.

 

So I was like:

 

“Unk, how do you view the world? What’s going on, Unk?”

 

Basically I was the same relationship I have with Zoomers and is like that relationship when I was The Age that a lot of Zoomers are that asked me for advice And I’m now. I’m now 90.

 

But anyway, he says, he’s like:

 

“Sewelly, you’re the only one with a car. You know, can you drive me around? I gotta say goodbye to some people.”

 

And so he drives me out in the middle of nowhere, and then we go walking for like 40 minutes down this beach. And I’m like:

 

“What are we doing?”

 

And we find these Aboriginals just on this beach in the middle of nowhere. And they’re all sitting cross legged and around a little campfire. And he introduces me to them and he’s speaking their language, like full Aboriginal! Like whatever sect of Aboriginal they are. And he’s speaking their language. And he introduces me and he says a bunch of Aboriginal words.

 

And then he says my name. And then he says:

 

“5 RAR, 5th Battalion.”

 

And I was like:

 

“What did you say to them?”

 

And he said:

 

“You’re a young warrior from my tribe, from the 5th Battalion tribe. And that you’re a good warrior. You’re a good, young, strong warrior and that you’re helping me today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh.”

 

And then they all, like, acknowledged me. They’re all sitting different. So it was men. I was sitting with the men, obviously, and the women were sitting at a different campfire with the women, and it was segregated.

 

And so I was with the men and Knighty was explaining to them how I was a good warrior, a good young warrior of the 55 RAR tribe. And we’re sitting there and they’re just talking and talking, and I went into a trance. I was tired, but I didn’t know what was, … It was like someone had drugged me. I was in a trance and I was just staring at the ocean, because we’re on the beach. And I was staring at the ocean and the sky was purple.

 

And I was like:

 

“Is there something in this fireplace? Like, what? Like, am I on?”

 

I’ve never at this stage, I’d never tried any drug ever!

 

And I was like:

 

“Is this what acid feels like?”

 

That’s what I was thinking in my head.

 

And I was like:

 

“What is going on?”

 

And they’re making that noise that they make. They’re talking and yeah. And then the sun’s coming up and I’m like, what is going on? And I look at the time and it’s like 6:30. And it was just surreal! It was a surreal experience. And then he’s like:

 

“All right, we’re gonna go.”

 

He gave them bananas and double A batteries. And he taught them how to like Jerry rig a phone to be able to give co-ordinates so that he could communicate where they were in the bush using GPS. And it was just fascinating! It was just absolutely fascinating! That was my first positive experience with Aboriginals. And I had had only about 500 negative experiences with Aboriginals prior to that moment. And every negative experience I’d had with Aboriginals was them being drunk, or not even drunk, but them just behaving the way they behave, and then being violent and aggressive towards me for just existing, for just walking down the street or just going to the shops at two o’ clock in the afternoon. Or them harassing like pregnant ladies trying to get in their car, demanding money off them. Like just every experience I had was so negative.

 

[46:02]

 

And then this was the first time I was like:

 

“I think I’m starting to understand these people. They live in a dream time.”

 

Like the proper full bloods. They live in a different reality to us. They don’t like time. The way we view time and the way they view time is completely different! And I somehow empathed in that moment into their little hive mind with Knightie, who was like my guide. His name was Christopher Knight, like a knight of Christ! And he was a very spiritually attuned man. And that was an experience I’ll never forget. I think I was almost, 20 years old. I was only 19!

 

But yeah, very interesting stuff. Very, very interesting stuff.

 

The stream looks frozen on my end. What is going on? No, no, it’s not frozen. Excellent! Yeah. What can I say? What can I say? I’ve seen the best of it and I’ve seen the worst of it. And the best of it is we should just leave these people alone. Like the problem is enlightenment. In a lot of ways, [chuckling] enlightenment has benefits, certainly. I’m not anti-enlightenment. You know, that’s a big part of how we’ve come to be. And it was a big part of our life cycle as a civilisation. It’s the second last phase of civilisation is enlightenment. The Greeks went through this around, I don’t know, 400 B.C. And yeah, I’m not against, you can’t be against it because it’s nature, it’s time itself.

 

But one of the dumbest parts of enlightenment is “equality”. That’s the dumbest part of enlightenment. The, the, that is the false enlightenment. The false enlightenment is that we’re all blank slates and that we’re all equal. That you know:

 

“All men are created equal before God and blah blah, blah!”

 

That is the most. How the hell. I don’t even know if they sincerely believe that. I can’t even fathom that they were that stupid that the people that colonised Australia, … Because when I read Clark, I’ve got it right here actually, this one here.

 

So this guy’s a communist. He’s a piece of shit, Leftist communist! And he wrote A History of Australia. I have, I’ve only read this one. I haven’t read the other volumes. I think this one ends around 1830. And he wrote this in I think 1961 or 62. And he’s a full blown communist and was investigated by ASIO for being, for coordinating with. Here’s the big boy here. Here’s the main man. Here’s the main man. Mr. Cook. Captain Cook. Anglo Saxon. Anglo Saxon. But yeah, Melbourne University. He’s a commie at Melbourne University.

 

Anyway, I read it. It’s quite interesting, quite subversive. But he, oh, he really emphasises the how enlightened Captain Cook and you know, Arthur Bligh and all these guys were and how they, but what’s interesting is he can’t hide the fact that despite their Enlightenment, despite the fact that they. Excuse me. They arrived in Australia and they tried to treat the Aboriginals as equals.

 

And so they’re like:

 

“Hey, let’s trade.”

 

And then there was nothing to trade. So they were like:

 

“Hey, let’s, …”

 

It was like a clash of values because they had these Enlightenment values and they didn’t know how to implement them on the Aboriginals. They didn’t know.

 

And so there was a whole bunch of different treat ways the Aboriginals were treated by European colonists. And I think it was the Portuguese and the Spanish in the Americas, but a little bit even in the Asia Pacific region, the Portuguese were in Asia Pacific as well. And they were basically like:

 

“You’re going to convert to Catholicism by the sword!”

 

And what Clark says is that they didn’t have those Enlightenment values. So you’ve got like Protestant Anglos trying to communicate with Aboriginals and like uplift them into humanity and uplift them into civility.

 

And then you’ve got the Portuguese with almost like pre-Enlightenment Catholic values that were just like “convert or die”. And that’s quite interesting. You know, it’s possible to talk about history without talking about Christianity. But yeah, that’s quite interesting. I won’t expand on that too much. You can gather from that what you want.

 

Yeah, where was I going with that? Yeah, he has all these little anecdotes or all these little stories about these first encounters and how, yeah, the enlightened English were just bewildered and were just like:

 

“We’ve never encountered this anywhere in the world!”

 

And he’s actually honest about the criticisms that they had. I think he might over embellish their enlightenment principles. I think they were probably a lot more racist than what he’s articulating because he’s a communist.

 

But yeah, I think I titled this Aboriginal communism, didn’t I? Before we get into the woman question, ultimately, if we don’t segregate from Aboriginals, we’re going to get destroyed by Aboriginal communism the way that what’s going on in South Africa, they’re dealing with African communism. And when you end apartheid and you mix or you attempt to get the races to all live together in equality and one is so different to the other, it’s a race to the bottom! And that’s ultimately what communism is, it’s a race to the bottom.

 

And it’s not just anti-enlightenment because there’s a lot of things that are anti-enlightenment, but it is anti-life! It’s ultimately anti-life because our version of life is an upward force, not a, so it’s hard to cover this without getting into the Greeks. You got to get into the Greeks because they figured all this out! And I don’t mean like the Greeks is in the souvlaki shop. I mean like the ancient Greeks, the philosophy.

 

The Greeks realised that when they went through their enlightenment that there’s not just being, there’s becoming. And that the ultimate being is becoming. And we use the word “progress” now and that word is obviously really dirty and that’s why I don’t use it. It’s a very dirty word. To say something is “progressive”, you’re saying it’s Leftist.

 

[53:19]

 

And so the Leftists have actually somehow inverted “becoming” into “progression”. And so when they say it’s progressive, it’s actually regressive! It’s regressive of the total life force. Leftism is the downward path. It’s not Left versus Right, it’s up versus down! And this is something that you really need to understand. Communism, Aboriginal communism, jewish communism, any form of communism, any form of Leftist progression is a progression downwards! It’s progressing the life form downwards. And this applies to even politics of today.

 

So if you want to talk about party politics, if you want to call it that if you want to talk about Parliamentarianism, what the Labor Party here in. I know this is people like, I’m tuning out. I don’t want to hear this. But normies want to hear this. Normies, you do need to. If you’re listening to this, you’re probably not a normie. And you do need to know how to apply the logic that I’m articulating here in the stream to things other than ancient Greece and ancient Rome and like all this stuff, you need to be able to apply it to be able to explain it to, … You need to be able to speak in tongues and that doesn’t mean like that crazy Evangelical crap. That means you need to be able to speak the tongue of the people.

 

And so what the Labor Party here in Australia has done is they’ll get lost on this because they haven’t read a book on economics, but it’s this Keynesian economics where it’s window breaking. So they believe that if you keep breaking windows, the GDP will go up because the glazier is going to make more money. And, it’s all that in conjunction with Fabian socialism. So Fabian socialism is what:

 

“We want the windows to be broken because we want more money wasted on fixing windows instead of building the power system.”

 

And so Fabian socialists or Fabian Communists, Fabian Marxists. They’re ultimately Marxists. They want to create this workers revolution through accelerating the decline of society by wasting as much money as possible.

 

And so that’s why the NDIS is the way it is. That’s why the NDIS is bigger than the defense budget. That’s why we spend more money on parasites and retards than we do on protecting the nation from foreign invasion. It’s why we spend so much money on basically compounding problems. Not fixing problems, but compounding problems! And the problem itself is often the expenditure, the wastage, the fact that we’re taxing the noble, the good, the healthy, and we’re giving to the evil and the weak and the disgusting and the decrepit.

 

And this is Kali Yuga stuff. This is end of time stuff. This is what Hitler talks about in Mein Kampf. Why you have to read Mein Kampf. It’s not negotiable. It’s not negotiable! If there’s only one book you should read, it’s Mein Kampf, because he explains all of this. He explains exactly what’s happening, exactly why it’s happening and exactly what you need to do to stop it from continuing to destroy your society.

 

So that’s why they’re window breaking. That’s why the Labor Party and all the Greenies and all these freaks, they’re all on board with destroying society through taking money from good people and giving it to broken people. And what that does is that what you feed grows. And they know that! They know that! They know it and they’ve already projected how that industry is going to expand. And it is beyond political parties. I mean it’s the Uni-Party doing it. It’s not just the Labor Party. But it obviously gets worse under one and then the other does Labor Party light. They do Fabian socialism light. That’s what the Liberal Party is. It’s homosexuality light. Fabian socialism light. Retard economics light. You know it’s diet retardation!

 

Anyway. Aboriginal communism. Yeah. Where are we? Yeah. I don’t normally do Superchats mid conversation but Delvian said:

 

“Isn’t the abo love a second order consequence of White men becoming feminised and White women hating their own men?”

 

There’s definitely an element to that. I think there’s a lot of different components to the so-called “Aboriginal love”. There’s the false enlightenment, there’s self hatred. Yes. There’s virtue signaling. So society is structured wrong, which is what we’re going to get into with the feminine society and the woman question. Society is structured with an inversion of natural law. The moral framework of society is an inversion of what our society was built on.

 

So that is often described as late stage decline or degeneration where you forget what your purpose was to such an extent where it’s upside down. There’s obviously nefarious influence. There’s particular (((interest groups))) that are a particular ethno-religious orientation and they compound and accelerate and destabilise. Certainly. They’re obviously a major player in that process but it does happen on its own. And you know there’s a lot of, I won’t go into all the proverbs and quotes on the subject but this festering can only exist if you’re already going in that direction. What we need is a complete re-evaluation of values. And you know we have gone through two or three generations of a nihilist phase and we are re interpreting and revaluing our values. We are so far ahead morally of where we were 50 years ago. And people will aay:

 

“No! That’s not true. No! People were so conservative back in the day.”

 

And it’s like they were running off inertia. They hadn’t actually evaluated their values. They were just running off inertia. We’re actually so much further ahead by going through the decline, seeing the nihilism, seeing the hedonism.

 

[1:00:19]

 

 

And I have so much faith and hope in the young generation. Young White people across the world, obviously, a lot of them are infected with the social disease. A lot of them are infected. But the ones that aren’t infected with the social disease have immunity. They have immunity! They have built up. They don’t need to be injected with anything. They have natural immunity! Young White people across the Western world are growing up immune to this social disease. And the disease of our time is not the plague. It’s not the Spanish Flu. It’s not? What is it? You know, all the ones that people, tuberculosis. It’s not these things that are killing people anymore, you know.

 

And Edward Dutton covers this a lot. I’ve talked about this on streams for years and years, and I’m so glad someone actually wrote a book about it. I’ve only read the blurb. I haven’t actually read the whole book, but I might actually get around to reading it at some point. But Dutton covers this and he explains that just the mutational load has the selection process now is, are you a retard or are you not? And if you’re not a retard, you’re most likely immune to the retardation that’s destroying our society.

 

So, yeah. All right, we’ll do it. We’ll go into the woman question. Check the comments first. Someone says:

 

“Ban women!”

 

No, we don’t need to ban them. Reese White says:

 

“Thomas. So are you a fan of Adam Green?”

 

I don’t really know anything about Adam Green. I’ve seen him on Twitter. He’s the anti-Christian guy, isn’t he? He’s kind of built like a platform. I haven’t seen him at all! I’ve never spoken to him. I don’t really know anything about him. I only know of him. Yeah, I can’t comment on that question. I’ve seen a lot of people attack him saying he’s jewish, and I’ve seen him say that Christianity is jewish.

 

So it’s like everyone’s saying:

 

“You’re a jew! No, you’re a jew! No, you’re a jew!”

 

And it’s like I’m not getting into it. It’s not in my sphere. I think I’ve seen him do chats with HT [Handsome Truth]. Yeah, we will cover a little bit of Christianity here. But yeah, you all know I’m not Christian. But we will cover it and we’ll cover it in a respectful way. I think that any criticism people have of Christianity should be done respectfully. I know that’s hard to do. It is very hard to do. But this is a, yeah, I try to be as secular as possible and yeah, let’s start with that. Let’s actually start with Christianity.

 

Let’s start with. If we’re going to talk about the woman question, let’s talk about Christianity.

 

So the Hebrew mythology or the Hebrew founding story is Adam and Eve. It’s a bit different to other founding stories, but you’ll find there’s so much similarities when you’re talking about the origins of man from. And I don’t use mythology. I don’t say mythology in a bad way. I don’t say it in a, I don’t mean it in a negative way. I’m not putting a pejorative on it. You know, all founding myth is myth. It’s mythos. We don’t know for sure, but we can respect myth. I respect myth. Yeah, and geez, we’re already into it.

 

But we all know the story Genesis. So we have this perfect garden of peace and harmony and the founding story of Christianity and therefore the founding message, the founding message of Christianity is that women are inherently attracted to evil. And breaching the peace and harmony of the garden that’s created by the father.

 

So it’s kind of like women inherently have to “shit test” a situation, a society, a these aren’t my words. This is not even my personal interpretation. I didn’t come up with this is what the Bible says.

 

And anyone that has a different version of Genesis is a moron and hasn’t read it. So many Christians haven’t read the Bible. Probably one of my main issues with Christians is that they haven’t read the Bible. I don’t think you should be allowed to call yourself a Christian if you haven’t read the Bible.

 

And likewise, I don’t think people should call themselves a National Socialist if they haven’t read Mein Kampf. I don’t think you should say that. I think you should say I’m interested in National Socialism, but I don’t think you should identify with it. You should hear the words from the man. He says it all. He outlines 95% of it in one book. And it’s a lot easier to read than the Bible. The Bible is a very hard book to read. It’s very tedious at parts. It, sure, it has beautiful parts, like all religious books have beautiful parts, but it is a very hard read. It’s a very long book. It’s like a million words. It takes a long time. Unless you race through it, if you race through it, you’re going to miss things. But Genesis is very clear. Like the first books, Genesis and Exodus, these things are very clear. Very, very clear. There’s no, not much nuance to it.

 

Now there’s obviously different mythological interpretations. What is the snake and what is the apple and what is God’s command and all this. But if you’re going to found a religion off this principle, it’s going to bleed through the whole text, isn’t it?

 

So whatever you’re reading later on in the Bible has to always come back to Genesis and a belief system that men and women were created unequally, that man was created from breathing life into dust or into matter. Women were created from the rib of man, so from the side. So it’s a peer, but it’s not an equal peer. There’s some sort of difference there. And so, I mean, obviously.

 

[1:07:14]

 

But I was talking to Jacob recently and he’s been deep diving Plato. Absolutely deep diving Plato. I’ve read the Republic, but I haven’t read much else from Plato. And he was negging Aristotle, which I was surprised at because I actually prefer, at this stage, I prefer Aristotle to Plato, not to get too much into philosophy, but I’ve only read the Republic. So and I didn’t really rate it, to be honest. I thought it was an interesting dialogue, but I didn’t rate it as much as it gets glazed. But he’s been reading all the other stuff. Full deep diving into everything, every single thing the guy’s written. And what he said to me was, and this is very recently, he said to me that the Greeks believed that, or Plato believed, and this became quite a common belief system, that if that souls were created, this is before Christianity, they believe that souls were created fresh and that they were all men, that if you lived a bad life, if you were a bit, you know, weak or immoral, that you would be reincarnated in your next life as a woman. And this became a pretty well established belief system. And it’s interesting that that is in some way similar to Christianity, that they arrived at a position where they were ripe for proselytisation from Christian apostles.

 

So let’s start there. Obviously, European Paganism is many things, just as Christianity is many things. There’s so much schism within Paganism. And when you’re talking generally about Paganism, you’re talking about general principles which we know from Greek, Roman, Zoroastrian, Indus Valley, and obviously Germanic and Celtic Paganism. And people will cherry pick what they want.

 

There are female church leaders at the moment. I mean, that’s just absurd to me that the whole book is a document saying that women can’t accurately interpret God. They can’t accurately communicate or interpret or follow instruction from God. And therefore they shouldn’t be in charge of the Church. They can’t be in charge of society, they can’t be in charge of the Church. They just don’t possess the correct component to do that. And the whole religion is founded on that principle.

 

And then you have such a degradation of the Church that you now have women pastors and preachers and priests, priestesses or whatever you’d call them. I mean, it’s absurd! It’s not my church, I’m not a Christian. But the hypocrisy is despicable! It is truly despicable! So fascinating!

 

Now, Paganism has varying degrees of male and female relationships. Some interpretations of Paganism are a bit more equitable, others a lot less equitable.

 

So when we go back to the ancients and when we look at thousands of years of civilisation, there is not really any society that has treated men and women as the same, nor has there been a society that has treated women the way women are being treated right now! And it’s not a surprise that our birth rates are really low. Any society that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any civilisation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any nation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies! And therefore it is a footnote in somebody else’s history.

 

So we have to reevaluate our values and we have to completely change the way we behave or we’re going to die!

 

And so the woman question is the same question as White genocide. It’s the same question as White replacement. You cannot separate the two. You can’t say:

 

“Let’s stick to just White nationalism and let’s not talk about how evil feminism is. Let’s talk about White replacement. But we’ve got to keep women on side. We can’t say things that might hurt the feelings of women.”

 

And as I said at the start of the stream, this is a really dumb, weak, coward strategy that’s going to cause us to die as a race! Women don’t respect pandering. They find it disgusting! Feminists are pure evil! And they will because of there’s some force, you know, Christians could say they’re possessed. And I do put a lot of weight in possession. I know not everyone does because not everyone believes they have a soul. And not everyone believes in metaphysics or in like a spirit realm. And so people that are very rational will say:

 

“This person’s unwell, or this person’s mentally ill.”

 

All means the same thing. Whereas the more religious or spiritual way of looking at it is this person is spiritually ill, this person’s potentially possessed. And this isn’t very electable, but I have witnessed what I could only describe as exorcisms. I have seen the way some people have behaved, and there is no rational or logical explanation other than this person is possessed. This person has a demon, a demon in them! They’re not at rest. They’re not in harmony. They’re not. There’s something that is currently occupying them and it’s potentially just a phase, but if it keeps occurring, it’s like there’s something that rears its head, something unbecoming.

 

And that’s a difficult conversation to have with people that don’t believe in demons. They don’t believe that it could be possible. They’re so far into post Enlightenment rationalism that just:

 

“It’s so irrational, the idea that there are forces beyond our control that could perhaps be bad forces!”

 

You know, we can acknowledge that there is a good force and inherently good force on earth, but then we want to pretend that there’s not an inherently bad force on earth?

 

[1:13:57]

 

So instead of arguing about whether Christianity is cucked or not, instead a better conversation is, what can we learn from Christianity? Where is Christianity right? And where is modern Christianity wrong? Or where is Christianity philosophically wrong? That’s a much more important discussion and it’s a more respectful discussion as well. Because what you’ll find is I can have these conversations. I had a conversation recently, probably 20, 30 minutes, with some Christian guys in America, and we could have a respectful conversation about what’s happening through that lens, through that lens of that there is an evil that is possessing. There is a snake in the garden, and it’s corrupting women. And then women are corrupting men. And that women, sorry, men, are aware of the snake. Snake, but most men are not aware of how this snake has perverted women.

 

And so the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read] is we need to normalise Patriarchy. I’m a big, big proponent of Patriarchy. I think that Patriarchy is the only way to save the White race. We cannot save the White race through feminism. We cannot save the White race through equality. We can only save the White race through a proper Patriarchy. A proper Patriarchy! And whether you’re Christian, pagan, agnostic, enlightened, not enlightened, Catholic, orthodox, doesn’t matter! We cannot solve male, female. It does not matter! We cannot solve this problem without Patriarchy.

 

Now, it’s very easy for me to acknowledge Patriarchy because, one, I had a really good father. I have a really good father. My father’s still alive. I have a really good father. A really good father! And he has his flaws. Absolutely! And that’s product of environment and breeding and everything else. Right. We all have our flaws. I have my flaws. Product of environment and breeding and circumstance. But we’re on a mission! My bloodline has definitely been through the wars, and we’re on our way back up. All right. There’s a few more generations of work to do to really get us back on track. But I’m part of a Patriarchy. I have a lot of respect for my family name, my line, my lineage, my ancestry. This is really important to me.

 

And, it’s easy for me to accept and acknowledge this harsh reality. It’s not even a harsh reality. This reality because of what I come from. Women that have good fathers can accept this as well. Most women that can’t accept Patriarchy, they don’t have any respect for their fathers. And they don’t have respect for their fathers because their fathers don’t deserve respect.

 

Respect is not something that you’re entitled to. It is only earned. And I know that’s a platitude, and some people might think that’s a meaningless platitude, but that is absolutely core! Respect is earned! You’re not entitled to anyone’s respect. This is, I think, a false enlightenment principle that, like you should just respect the retard being moved around in the wheelchair. Like, what? What planet are these people on? Like, why that makes you a good person? How does that make me a good person? You know what quality of life is the drooling retard, God? And why are we wasting all our tax dollars paying for the drooling retard? This is solved very easily by Patriarchy. It’s not just solved by having a department in government that deals with the problem. It’s solved by Patriarchy.

 

And so one of the first principles of Patriarchy is that every man is king and priest and judge of his own house! I’ll say it again, for those that aren’t listening. The first principle of Patriarchy is that every man is king, is priest, is judge of his own house! And general. That was a component as well. There’s a martial component to it. And so every son, every boy wants to respect his father for the man that he is. And I can’t empath into how girls think, because I’m not a girl, but I would assume it’s similar. Not the same, but I assume it’s similar. I obviously have daughters. And you know what I was sad about when I was growing up? Not sad, but one thing I was surprised at was I asked my dad why he never joined the army. Because I know his dad was in the navy or in the Defense Force. I know his granddad was in the army.

 

And I remember asking my dad:

 

“Why weren’t you in the army?”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, look.”

 

Because they had the draught for the Vietnam War, and he was of that age, and he just never got called up. So he was like:

 

“Oh, I got lucky!”

 

That was his answer. I think he said something:

 

“I got lucky. You know, you put your birthday in. You had to register. You put your birthday in.”

 

And he said something about “balls with birthdays” on them. Like, it was like the lotto. Like, they’d pull a ball out. And if it was like, March 18th, which is my dad’s birthday, then you’re going, you’re signing up.

 

And I thought that was absurd! But it’s one way to do it. I mean, it’s fucking clown world! But anyway, that was his position, was like:

 

“Oh, he got lucky. He avoided it.”

 

And I always thought to myself, wouldn’t it be cool? I always thought, wouldn’t it be cool to walk into my dad’s office and he’s got all his, like, armour and his rifle? And I just had this idea of like. And it’s probably ancient. It’s probably something like an altar, like an altar to Mars, like an altar to masculinity, an altar to the Patriarchy. And then to be able to see my grandfathers and you know there are families that still, they keep all their family medals, the war medals and stuff.

 

[1:20:20]

 

But I mean let’s put that on steroids. It’s not just having like the medals, it’s like walk in and be able to see like generations and generations of uniforms and rifles and, or even before going all the way back to a family sword. That just, that idea is just so cool! And I think every like 10 year old boy thinks like that.

 

And if you don’t, you’re probably a faggot, or maybe you had the idea but in a different way. But if that doesn’t seem cool to you, yeah, fuck you basically! I don’t know. Yeah, you’re not in my gang, that’s for sure. You’re not in my tribe.

 

So back to the woman question. So [chuckling] respect, respect. You can respect that. And I didn’t respect my dad as much as I would have if we had something like that. If my dad had something like I kind of lost a little bit of respect for my dad when I was like 10 years old. When I was like:

 

“Why wasn’t my dad. His answer was he ‘got lucky’.”

 

I was like:

 

“Huh, I don’t know if that’s luck.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like why would that be lucky? Obviously it’s a dumb war and blah, blah, blah and geopolitics is so broken and everything now.

 

But I think part of us is whether you go and fight in a war or not, I think men should be war-like. And I think the “retard budget” should be directed entirely into well first of all we shouldn’t be taxed as much as we are. So there shouldn’t even be a retard budget.

 

But obviously I like when we take power. I’m deleting the retard budget and putting all of it or most of it or some of it into building like the Stormtrooper halo suit Department. I’ve said this before.

 

To get back onto, someone just says:

 

“Fuck employment!”

 

[chuckling] Modern world does a Superchat:

 

“Thoughts on the employee question.”

 

I actually haven’t watched the podcast that young Michael Nelson did on the subject of employment but I can imagine what he was saying. My position has always been that you need to be productive, you need to be productive, you need to find a way of being productive. You don’t want to just sit around doing nothing! But you need to have times of sitting around doing nothing in order to think of productive things to do.

 

And when you’re in employment, like I have had nothing but issues with like Gen-X’s and Boomers that have employed me over the years where they want you to work 50, 60 hour weeks, they want you just in employment, they want you just head down and just hammer drill in the concrete and just ernnn! Or if you’re doing some other job that’s slightly more technical or less manual labour, it’s the same thing. It’s just head down and you’ve just got no time, no time to be a better man. You’re just stuck in a trap! You’re stuck in like a debt trap. And I don’t think there’s ever been a time in human history where anyone except slaves have worked six days a week or even five days a week. I just think that that’s slavery and they’re boxing us in. We’re getting boxed in and boxed in and boxed in! It’s so obvious what’s happening and it’s so obvious why Zoomers especially and Gen Alpha will be even more so, why people are checking out of this employee, … We’re just getting boxed in.

 

Like we’ve gone from nice blocks of land. There’s plenty of things to do, there’s plenty of animals to tend to. And then you work a couple days a week, you know, old mate needs help with something, you go help him, this guy and people were these warrior farmer builders first, and they were doctors and doctors and dentists and lawyers and tradesmen or skilled labourers second. And it was the pleb class. It’s always historically been the pleb class that became entirely microscopically focused on a singular trade. So like I do pottery, that’s all I do they live in a tiny little house in the city in Rome and they’re the Potter. And all they do is pottery and they just make pots and nothing else. And they do it six days a week, 12 hours a day. And they make pots and they sell the pots and they make pots and they sell the pots. That is what slaves do. That’s what slaves do. That’s slavery!

 

And so, but the whole economics is geared against us because of what they’ve done, because of interest, because of debt slavery. It’s because of debt slavery we can’t build intergenerational wealth where we can have big families on large plots of land where we can learn a whole bunch of skills and manage our farms and feed ourselves and look after ourselves in tight knit communities.

 

The whole economics is now geared that everyone’s a little bug, a little cog in the system. They do their little bug roll and they get their little bug ration and this is broken. This is not sustainable. It’s not going to last. How many generations is this going to go on for? Judging by how much Zoomers want to check out, I’d suggest that Alphas or Betas or what like two or three generations from now, if this problem hasn’t solved itself, I would assume things are gonna be very different.

 

[1:26:10]

 

 

And obviously tying this into politics we’re gonna completely change the zoning laws. Part of the problem with this is people living on 200 square metre little blocks, apartments, townhouses. Part of this is just so dysgenic. We need to not be slave bug people. We need space, we need land, we need multitudes of tasks. Specialisation is key. Don’t get me wrong. We built higher civilisation because individuals did hyper specialise into things. But making pots is not a hyper specialisation. You know what I mean? Like historically people did their specialisation part time. They’d worked a couple days a week doing, and it was usually what was called journeymen. They were usually journeymen like if they were a dentist, or a doctor or whatever and obviously there was no such thing as a lawyer. The whole system worked differently, like tradition, ancient culture and the higher becoming. We have better technology now, but it’s made us, I think we can do both. I think we can continue to improve technology without living like bugs. And I don’t think that interest slavery helped us increase our technology. The increasing technology is part of the life cycle. It’s part of the life cycle of civilisation. And it’s not going to continue progressing in this direction forever for two reasons. One, the law of diminishing returns. And two, we are destroying our stock. So we can’t. We’re going to be in a system decline. The car, the calibre of men that built the society. We can’t even maintain it. We can’t even maintain it.

 

And there’s an elite. They call it elite overproduction. But it’s not. It’s the false elite overproduction. We’ve built a false elite and that’s why these rodents that are all 100, 105 IQ, they got Master’s degrees. They’re absolute midwits! They’re not idiots, but they’re absolute midwits! They are the ones running this into the ground. We have allowed midwits to take over society!

 

And I’m not going to talk about what my IQ is because I don’t think it’s super important, but I think it’s clear that it’s at least one or two standard deviations above average. And we’re having midwits go through university, male and female, and then they’re taking elite positions, but there’s not enough elite positions, so they have to create positions for these other fake elites.

 

And that’s like psychology, for example. You’ve got so many idiots going through university and studying psychology. And so we’ve created a whole industry of government rebates here in Australia and in America you’ve got all this drug prescription and all this mental illness and all this compounding issues of the parasitism of psychology. Psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapists, all of this is a parasite economy. They’re all parasites. They’re all parasites! It’s one giant parasite economy! And the purpose of it is to continue to make the problem worse so that they can have employment. And so they will never, ever be able to solve the problem because a purpose of a system is what it does.

 

So that’s just one element of university that’s caused this over education. We’ve got this over education where if you don’t go to university, you’re a moron. And it’s like we have more engineers and architects than we’ve ever had and our society is uglier and more broken! So it shows you that exclusion is the rule to greatness. You need to be exclusive in order to create hyper specialisation. You can’t just send everyone to university or the vast majority of people to university, and then think:

 

“Oh my God, society is getting so much better!”

 

It’s like, no, we’re running off the inertia of intelligent, hyper selective people. And the show’s about to come to a halt. We have printed so much money! They’re literally printing like $8 trillion, not a trillion, 8 billion dollars a day in the US to keep their bullshit fake economy going. And it’s just leading to the Weimar conditions. And we’re going to pay for all of this. We’re going to pay for all of this.

 

And that’s why you need to be prepared. You need to be prepared. And I’ve gone off topic from Patriarchy, but it all ties together. You can’t cover the subject without covering it all. Obviously. I’ll take a pause and I’ll come back.

 

Someone asked me about the employment question. Yeah. You gotta have skills. Look, you gotta have skills. Home of the brave, says:

 

“Tom, you’re the embodiment of the spiritual healing of the entire European race. Hey, we approach phase one of total re-migration of nons in the West. Segregation. Stay safe!”

 

Nah, I can’t do that on the stream. It’s a good question. I appreciate the question. Maybe I can leave that to the end. I can’t do that at this stage. I have to cover the woman question. Celine says:

 

“As a younger White woman, I’ve had to come to terms with Jesus being brown when I’ve always pictured him as a tall White man. Jesus being brown makes me deny it. Christianity is more of a woman thing.”

 

I don’t necessarily agree with. I don’t know what Jesus looked like. But I’ll tell you a really funny story. I’m not sure if I told this story on stream. Obviously all the Christian identitarians are raging at you now because they’re all saying Jesus was blonde hair, blue eyed, Aryan. I saw a really funny post yesterday or last night where some guy was saying that Jesus was Italian. He was like:

 

“He was born in Judea of the Roman province of Syria. He was therefore Roman. He was therefore Italian. Jesus was Italian!”

 

I just thought it was funny. Obviously he’s not being serious, but I wonder what the implications of everyone saying Jesus was Italian would be. And whether that’s like a bit of an icebreaker. Because it’s like people say Jesus is a jew. Well, the Bible says Jesus is a jew. And then Christian Identitarian said Jesus was like a Nordic Aryan. And then it’d be funny if we just say like:

 

“We meet at halfway and say Jesus was Sicilian or something!”

 

That’ll [chuckling] cause drama, won’t it, that one! But that just would be funny. We’re like, Jesus was White passing. That’s like the compromise. Now I know you people don’t believe in compromise. They want it one way or the other. Maybe that’ll keep the peace for like five minutes. If we just say Jesus was Italian. It’s a theory. What’s the funny story? So someone in the conversation tell me if I’ve said this before on stream. I can’t remember. Some [chuckling] guy replied, “smartest women woman”. Look, I think I’ve only told this story in person. It’s story time. I might have said it once on stream.

 

[1:33:41]

 

So the last time I was in prison last year I was in solitary confinement and I wanted a Bible. Actually, this Bible right here, this one right here. King James. I wanted a King James Bible because I got my other prison Bible. This is the prison Bible I got the first time into prison. It’s the NIV*. Look at that. [chuckling] Presented to Thomas Sewell, Melbourne Assessment Prison. That was in 2021.

 

[* The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.]

 

Anyway. This is now:

 

“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man. Adam and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame.”

 

Genesis 3:16:

 

“To the woman, he said, ‘I will make your pains in childbearing very severe. With painful labour you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you’.”

 

“Then the Lord said to Cain, where is your brother Abel? I don’t know. He replied, am I my brother’s keeper? The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen, your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for. You will be a restless wanderer of the earth.”

 

Yes, well, they got the mark on him. And I really wonder when circumcision started and when the restless wanderers of the earth started getting the anti-semitisms on him. Anyway, that’s just a theory. I won’t go too deep into that or piss people off.

 

But anyway, I got that version and I read it in full.

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow, okay!”

 

I probably should have read this the first time, but I wasn’t ready because you kind of you read the Bible when you’re a kid and you just like, you don’t read it properly, you don’t read it in full. And when you’re in solid confinement, you get a lot of time to read the Bible. And I read the NIV and I was like:

 

“Whoa, okay, this is definitely eye opening.”

 

And everyone’s trying to convert me. And I’m like:

 

“No, I can’t. Like, I just read it. I just read the whole thing. Are you kidding me?”

 

And they were like:

 

“You read the wrong translation.”

 

So then this time I went to prison. I went and got a King James. It didn’t make any difference for me. But I do think the King James is a better Bible. But story time.

 

So how did I get the King James Bible? So when I got to prison this time I got sent to Barwon, which is a much nicer prison. It’s older, but it is better. And because I was in Port Phillip before that. And they wouldn’t give me a Bible, they took my Bible off me. I got another NIV. I got a wait, is that King. No. So that’s a King James. No, they took it off me, sorry. I got that one later I got another NIV and when I got transferred from Melbourne Assessment the second time to the prison, the Barwon prison, they took my NIV off me and I had to fill out a form to get another Bible.

 

And I was like:

 

“Why? Why would you take the Bible off me? I don’t understand. Just let me keep the book.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, it’s not your property. It’s the property of the MAP.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“So you’re going to send the Bible back to the MAP, back to the other prison?”

 

It’s just crazy! But they’re just there to fuck with you. That’s their existence. And they won’t even let a non-Christian man keep his Christian book. And so then I had to fill out a form to get a Bible. And to get a Bible you had to have a meeting with a priest.

 

So if you want a Quran, you could have a meeting with an imam. If you want to. Whatever it is what it is. I don’t know what the Buddhists have. But like there was these boxes you could tick. I ticked the Christian box and I picked the Anglican one because I’m an Anglo Saxon and I’m not a Catholic, I’m not orthodox, and my grandmother was Anglican. None of the men in my family went to church really, but the women did. And they were Anglicans and so, Church of England. So I picked the Anglican box and it took two weeks.

 

And then this guy, I get pulled out of my cell and I get put in like a visitor room and I’m put in there with a priest. And I’ll just check the comments. Have I told this story on stream? Because I won’t go into too much detail if I have. Oh Jesus, so many comments. Have I told this story before? I’ll just tell the story!

 

And so he was like. I asked him:

 

“Why are you Christian?”

 

And he told me a story. The priest, he said that when he was a teenager he was really angry and him and his mates went out to this golf course and they had a BB gun and they shot a bunch of magpies or something. A bird, I can’t remember what type of bird I think was a magpie. Magpies. And he just felt horrible! He just felt horrible about it afterwards. He had a lot of regret and guilt about killing these magpies.

 

[1:40:02]

 

And then, he was raised in a Christian household, in a Christian environment, but he just wouldn’t go to church. And after like leaving the Church for a year or two and kind of hanging out with the wrong kids and you know, doing bad stuff, like shooting magpies with BB guns, as like most 14 year old boys probably would if they had a BB gun, he started noticing the kids walking home from church. They just looked happier. They just looked happier. And he was like:

 

“I wanted that happiness. I wasn’t happy and I wanted that happiness. And so I started going back to church and I asked my priest, when I was 14, I said I want to be happy like the other kids, they’re all happy. Why am I happy? And the priest said to me, you have to surrender yourself to God. You have to be God’s slave. You have to submit yourself. And once you submit yourself, then you’ll be happy. Then you’ll finally find peace. Because you’re fighting God and that’s why you’re unhappy. And you just have to stop fighting. You have to give up! And when you give up and you let go, then you’ll finally be happy.”

 

And he says:

 

“Why do you ask?”

 

And I was like:

 

“So I asked because I’m not Christian, but I ticked the Anglican box because it was the closest thing that I could do. But what I really want is a Bible. So I’ve got something to read in here because they’re torturing me and I’d like a Bible.”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, okay, okay, yeah, but why do you want to know why I’m a Christian?”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m just fascinated. I want to know your story. Like you’re a priest. Like you’re obviously highly motivated to be a Catholic, Anglican priest. You know, I just, I want to learn more about your journey and like how that, how do you become an Anglican priest?”

 

And then we talk a lot more about this subject. And he’s very, he’s very apprehensive. He’s very like on the back foot the whole time, very defensive. And yeah, just the way he explained it to me, I said to him:

 

“You know, do you still have this same attitude? Like, do you still feel this way about God? Is that your relationship with God?”

 

And he said to me, he said:

 

“I wake up every morning, and the first thing I do every morning is I pray to God and I say, God, I am your slave. Let your will be done through me! I am your vessel. I am your slave on this earth!”

 

And I was like:

 

“You do that every morning?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Yep, that’s what I do.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow! That is fascinating!”

 

And he’s like:

 

“It is, isn’t it? And I know that might sound really intense, but it works. It works for me! And I’m so much happier. Life is so much easier this way. It’s just so much easier! Like, I don’t feel what I used to feel. And, look, I still have challenges, and I’m a grandfather now, and da, da, da, da. But life is just so much easier this way!”

 

Okay, [chuckling] what the fuck! Okay. Anyway, an hour goes by, we shake hands, and he goes:

 

“Nice to meet you, Tom. Blah, blah, blah.”

 

And then the second time I meet him, so I ticked the box again. I want to have another conversation. He says to me right at the end, he goes:

 

“Do you want to meet me again? Do you want to talk to me again?”

 

I said:

 

“Absolutely! I really enjoyed this conversation.”

 

“Are you sure?”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I really enjoyed this conversation. I really enjoyed it. I would like to meet you again.”

 

And he said:

 

“Okay, well, what about next week?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Maybe not next week. I need a bit more time to digest this conversation. But maybe give me two weeks.”

 

He said:

 

“Okay, two weeks, Same time, same day.”

 

I’m like:

 

“Excellent!”

 

So this is my only human contact. I’m in a concrete box for two weeks straight. And then I meet up with him again. He walks in and he’s nervous. He’s so nervous! And he says:

 

“Tom, I have to be honest with you. I Googled your name. I thought I recognised you, but I Googled your name, and it was really hard for me to come in today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh! Why is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“Because, … There’s a lot of people in this prison, and they’ve really beautiful people that have done really horrible things. And I’ve never felt like this before where I felt selfish that I didn’t want to come in. But I prayed to God this morning, and I said God, I don’t want to talk to this man. I don’t like this man. I think this man is evil, and I don’t want to speak to him. What should I do? And what God told me was that’s why you have to go speak to him. Because he’s evil. Because he’s evil, you have to go speak to him. That’s why!”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, okay, all right.”

 

And then I said to him:

 

“You ever spoken to a paedophile?”

 

I said:

 

“Have you ever felt that way about a paedophile?”

 

And he was like:

 

“No, no. There are some really beautiful people in this prison. Some really beautiful people in this prison.”

 

“Never felt that way about a paedophile? Okay, interesting! Well, luckily, you are God’s slave, and that God forced you to come in here today to speak to me!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“I want to show you something. I want to show you my God! I want to show you my God!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, you want to show me your God?”

 

“Are you ready? Are you ready for my god?”

 

It’s this weird, passive aggressive, feminine. He’s got tears in his eyes. And he’s like:

 

“Before I do, can I ask you a question? Why did you want to speak with me?”

 

[1:46:16]

 

And I said to him:

 

“Because I told you the truth last time. My grandmother was an Anglican. I’m an Anglo Saxon. I ticked the Anglo box, not the Catholic box. Simple as.”

 

And he was like:

 

“But me specifically, did you know I was the Anglican priest. Me, personally?”

 

And I was like, I think his name was [changed]. And I was like:

 

“Leslie, I don’t know who you are. I just know that you’re an Anglican priest.”

 

He goes:

 

“You don’t know about my past?”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I don’t know. What is your past?”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, I want to tell you a story, Tom. You know, I had to take a stand against, … I mean, there’s a lot of evil men in the world., …”

 

And he’s talking like a lesbian. He speaks like a lesbian, right? He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of, …”

 

Like a feminist. He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of evil men in the world. And Donald Trump comes to mind, and Adolf Hitler comes to mind. And when I was younger, there was a man that came to power in Australia that reminds me of Donald Trump, and his name was John Howard. And when John Howard came to power, he had an immigration minister called Peter Dutton, who you might know, because he was running for prime minister recently. And they imprisoned people in concentration camps on, …”

 

I think it was like, Manus Island or something, one of these islands off the coast of Australia:

 

“And there were these people, these desperate, honest, loving, caring, they were God’s children, and they wanted to come to Australia, and they begged for our help and our safety. And they were refugees, …”

 

And he’s literally crying! He’s literally crying!:

 

“And we locked them and their children in concentration camps on these islands and treated them so horribly! And I had to make a stand, so I went and visited them!”

 

So he goes to the concentration camp and he’s like. [chuckling] He says:

 

“And I like painting. And I met this man, and he was a refugee, …”

 

And I think he was Iranian or Iraqi or something like that. I think Iraqi. And he goes:

 

“And I met this Iraqi man, and his name was Fadim, …”

 

Or some shit! And he goes:

 

“I said to him, you are so beautiful! You are such a beautiful man. Can I paint you? I want to paint you. Will you let me paint you?”

 

And then he said:

 

“Yes, I’ll let you paint me. And then I painted him.”

 

And it’s hot. It’s so weird! He’s holding a, he’s got like a, he’s got the, … Imagine this is the painting of the guy, but he’s got it like this, and he’s holding it on the table, and he’s holding it upside down. And he’s holding upside down on the table, and he’s like:

 

“I want to show you this. And the reason why I want to show you this is because when I was painting him, I looked into his eyes and he was crying. He had tears in his eyes as I was painting him. And I was painting him. And the whole time I was thinking about Jesus on the donkey going into Bethlehem as a refugee, needing safety. And I thought, this man is from that region. This man is from the same region, very similar region, near the Euphrates. And he’s a refugee as well., …”

 

You can predict the whole conversation, can’t you? Like, I’m drawing it out, but I’m drawing it out for effect. This was the tone this guy was taking with me.

 

“And I still remember. And I thought to myself, this is what Jesus would look like, and this is how Jesus would feel if he was here right now with us, seeing what John Howard, behaving in a fascist man manner, putting these innocent people in concentration camps! This is how Jesus would be looking at me. So I painted him. So I painted my God! This is my God, Thomas! This is my God!”

 

And then he shows me a painting of a brown man crying. And he’s like:

 

“This is my God! How do you feel?”

 

A picture of a brown man crying. And I was like:

 

“Fascinating! Fascinating! That’s your God?”

 

He’s like:

 

“I want you to have this. I want you to put this up in your cell.”

 

And I was like:

 

“No, no, I don’t want it. It’s your painting.”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, this is a copy of it. This isn’t the one I painted. This is a copy. I want you to have it. I want you to put this in your cell and I want you to look at my God! And I think that will really help you and I think that’s why I was sent here today to give you this painting.”

 

And I was like:

 

“It’s a decent painting. You’ve done a good job painting it, for sure. This is not my God! This is your God. This is not my God! I can’t put this in my cell. It’s just not my God! Not my God! There are many gods. This one’s not mine. This is your one!”

 

And [chuckling] that was the end of the conversation! And yeah, fuck, I’ve just had too much life experience at this stage! [chuckling]

 

[1:52:11]

 

And when I got out of jail, I’m gonna Google this church that this guy’s from. And it’s like gay flags and trans rights and refugees are welcome and all this shit!

 

And it’s like [chuckling] women pastors! These people, they’re sick! They make me sick! People in the chat saying, Jesus’ Italian. Man. A lot of, lot of Superchats to go through. Jeez. How much more do you want me to go, in a detail about that one? Oh, I don’t know what it is. It’s not dopamine, but it’s some sort of chemical. There’s some chemical in the brain. It’s just surreal! It’s like a surreal chemical. It’s not dopamine. It’s the surrealism of it. It’s the surrealism. Hyper, hyper, what do they call it? Hyper realism. How are these people real? They share this planet with us. What planet are they on?:

 

“I felt really bad for the magpies. That’s why I had to go back to the Church!”

 

Well, yeah, obviously you shouldn’t just like indiscriminately kill animals!

 

But what he was doing at 14 was what all 14 year old boys do, is they’re testing themselves. They’re seeing, can I do it? Can I do it? Can I put meat on the table? Can I put meat on the table?

 

And I said to him:

 

“Are you a vegetarian now?”

 

When he talked about the magpies, I said:

 

“Are you a vegetarian?”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, no, I’m not, but I make sure I thank God every time I have meat. And I thank God for what’s happened to the animal and pray for the animal.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, that’s fair enough. That’s good. I respect that.”

 

I have a lot of respect for that. I think that’s important when you take life and you’re consuming that life. Trans. The transmutation of it. Transubstantiation. Yeah. Like you’re putting meat on the table and you shouldn’t indiscriminately kill, but you’re doing what all teenage boys do when they’re going through puberty is they’re seeing not just if they can do it, but they go over the top. You know what I mean? They go a little, you go a little bit over the top and then you dial it back in. You’re like:

 

“All right, that was unnecessary.”

 

But he’s gone, he’s dialled it back in so much that his God is a brown man crying. That he has to live with White people!:

 

“He has to come live with the White people! He has to! We have to let them in! We have to!”

 

This is what his God wants. So look, obviously if you’re a Christian and you’re watching this, you would be disgusted by that story, that this is the calibre of priests. This is not Patriarchy. This is not the original church. This is not anything like the Greeks or the Romans or the Hebrews or even the jews. This is like the jews don’t even behave this way. This is like sub-Aryan and sub, even sub-Hebrew behaviour. And like ancient Hebrew, if we’re going to call it that. But this is like a completely poisoned chalice and these people are church leaders.

 

And so, yeah, it’s been completely infiltrated by communists. This is the downward path. They’re cherry picking document a book that has a lot in it.

 

As I said, the Bible’s a million things! There’s a million words in it. There’s a lot going on in that book. You can cherry pick whatever you want to articulate something, but what you can’t lie about is the general progression of themes and the general moral structure that the Bible is putting forward.

 

Now, is there, in my opinion, contradictions of the moral structure? I think there are some things that, and I’ve discussed them, I won’t go into them today. But you’ve all heard me say what I think is contradictory in there, within the moral, within the framing of a lot of things. And in short, I don’t like the story of Jacob and Esau. I don’t like that story.

 

Well, I mean, I don’t like the character! I don’t like the individual. And I don’t like the moral of that story. I think it is either miswritten or it’s not correct, it’s not right, it’s not fair, or there’s missing data, something’s missing from it. In my opinion. Like that would be the only way I could describe it as a moral story. Anyway. But the Bible’s full of that, of this kind of fight of morality. And you can see the schism of morality. You can see the schism of an ethnicity or the schism of a people are schisming, which is I guess one of the main themes of the whole text.

 

But if we just come back a little bit and we don’t talk about the Bible and Christianity, we just talk about the theme of Patriarchy, which is beyond just Christianity. I think that’s one thing the pagans and Christians can both agree on, is that we need Patriarchy.

 

And I think the Christian view is that women are inherently prone to an evil influence, just as men are, but that it infects the women first. And you can kind of see that with how giving women the right to vote and the late Enlightenment values of total, absolute human equality led to the suffragettes and led to women voting and led to first wave, second wave, third wave feminism that has come out of that structure. And we can see the damage that that has done to society. Anyone that can’t is obviously an idiot! But we can see the damage that it’s done. And yet women are also capable of fixing the situation. That’s also interesting.

 

As I said before, when I started women, more women voted for Adolf Hitler than men!

 

[1:58:41]

 

 

So that is a very redeeming quality when you realise that. Well, hang on a minute. Why? How could that possibly be? How could that possibly be? And what that might give a little bit of Credence to is this idea that when there is a strong leader, when there is a return of masculinity and a return of Patriarchy, women are actually more inclined to notice it than men. Women are more intuitive to the cure than men are. They’re more sensitive to the disease, but they’re more sensitive to the cure as well.

 

So I had a thought that ran through my head yesterday or the day before, which was, if we don’t contain women or restrain women, who will? Who’s going to? Because what we can see by the decline of the last hundred years of civilisation is we have removed the barriers, all barriers, every barrier possible, and said:

 

“No. Men and women are exactly the same!”

 

And we have done this to the detriment of women. We have not improved their life, and more importantly, we have not improved civilisation, and we have not improved the fucking mission. And the mission isn’t to make women happy. I want to make that very clear. That’s not the mission. It’s not to make men happy either. You know what this guy’s talking about? It’s like he accepted God because he wanted to be happy. That’s what Nietzsche talks about. That’s crazy! Well, it’s not crazy, but it’s like, that’s not why you should accept God. That’s selfish! That’s not the mission. Morale is not your happiness. It’s your willingness to fight. You have to fight for a mission. You have to fight for a purpose, for meaning.

 

And I believe you have to fight for life itself. Life is an upward struggle. And my religion, my personal religion is what my interpretation of Hitler’s religion is, which is that it’s about struggle into victory. And that these things aren’t necessarily steady states or acts of being, but they’re acts of becoming. Struggle is an act of becoming into victory, which is also an act of becoming.

 

So it’s never ending. It never ends. It’s like beyond time because God has to be above time. God can’t be subject to time because then he’s not God. So God is above time. So therefore, struggle and victory have to be conceived as being principles above time. That it’s like infinite struggle for infinite victory. It’s just like a yeah, it’s like you got a hail victory and you got a hail struggle. You got a hell struggle to hail victory! You know, which is a bit. Yeah, a bit different to:

 

“I just wanted to be happy! I just saw all these people around me and they were happy. And I just wanted to be happy. I just wanted to be a good person because I was a bad person!”

 

You know what? Yeah. [chuckling] Very different sense of moral structure and moral framework. So yes, Patriarchy, restraint, it’s about building a world that is driving towards this goal. And the relationship between men and women in that world is one built off respect, not pandering.

 

And so the issue with our society at the moment at a just socio-economic level with 50, 60% divorce rate, with the family courts tearing families apart like all the societal diseases we’ve got, is about, what they all come down to regarding the bad relationships between men and women and is that women have on average more respect for the government and more respect for the system, for the justice system or for the police than they do for their own husband and their own father. That’s the issue!

 

So a system needs to be built by husbands and fathers that form a collective, that form an organisation that are all on the same page with how they’re managing their family. It’s up to them how they manage their family. But they’re all roughly on the same page as to how they manage their family. A nation is a collection of families. It’s not a bunch of gay men masturbating into each other’s assholes and adopting kids. That’s not a nation. That’s just craziness! A nation is a bunch of families. You know, the family is the building block. This is not a meaningless platitude. It is the truth! You cannot have a nation without families. Because a nation is an extension of the family.

 

And so therefore the leader of a nation has to be the extension of the leader of a family. And the leader of the family is the father or the grandfather or the great grandfather, if he’s still alive. Like that is the leader of the family.

 

And that’s how society has always worked. And it’s a sacred, ancient, basically unwritten rule. I mean, we don’t even need to write this down. This is a reality.

 

And anyone that disagrees with that reality is our enemy. Because they disagree with it, because they care more about something else than making our society, our civilisation, our blood, our spirit, our life force, move upwards. They care about something else. They care about some sort of momentary happiness or some sort of:

 

“I want to feel good. I want to get along with everyone.”

 

Like this is their God, this is their God!

 

And so those people shouldn’t be given the same rights as the Patriarchs, as the people that acknowledge that:

 

“Hang on a minute. We’ve tried that. What it leads to is like millions of Indians and Arabs and Africans coming into our country and just like raping and pillaging and destroying it economically, socially, and sometimes unfortunately, physically.”

 

And these consequences are obvious. And we’re going to structure society in a way that this doesn’t happen going forward. So yeah, it’s non-negotiable. I’ll go through the comments and wrap up the stream.

 

[2:05:06]

 

Where are we? Where are we? Celine’s got another question. Just something about I don’t like Christians. Cool. Three story Rory:

 

“G’day, Thomas. What do you think about starting a petition for Joel Davis similar to one for Brandon Koschel? Chances of their release are low, but this activism can rally support and drive attention.”

 

A petition? I don’t understand what a petition is. Yeah, I’m not in the petition business because it doesn’t work. It doesn’t do anything. There’s a petition to deport me to New Zealand with a hundred thousand signatures, and yet here I am in Melbourne, Australia.

 

So look, the way we get Joel out of prison is either he’s released because the Supreme Court has a sense of the law and will enforce the law and the law says that he should be released from prison. And the Supreme Court follow through with that because the magistrates certainly don’t uphold the law. They’re activists. They’re political activists that do what the politicians tell them to do. That’s the only way to get him out of prison. Or we wait for the infinity amount of time he’s got to be in prison.

 

But yeah, sorry, a petition is not going to do anything. It’ll help raise awareness and that’s really the purpose of petitions. But no, I’m not in that business:

 

“Thank you for your sacrifices and bravery. God bless!”

 

Yep, thank you. A lot of comments. A lot of comments. Fanny Schrute says:

 

“Jesus was Italian.”

 

I think that’s the way to go. Someone gives me $100 for the cause:

 

“No need for acknowledgment.”

 

Thanks, mate. Celine’s got another one. Something about KGV, Shakespearean old English language. Stone Mountain:

 

“What are your thoughts on infidelity in women versus infidelity in men? And are our highly successful Chad man with multiple baby mothers a greater good or bad for society?”

 

Oh, that actually brings me to what I was meant to talk about the manosphere and stuff and we just end up talking about Christianity. Yes. That actually brings me to the second half of the stream, and we’ve been going for like two and a half hours. It’s crazy! This is madness, guys!

 

Yes, yes. Look, let me get a glass of milk. Let me get a glass of milk. And I have all these thoughts that I’m gonna put down. Because there’s just been so much chatter about the manosphere and looks maxing and Louis Thoreau’s recent thing. And I made a little post. Obviously most of you have probably already read my post, just explaining, the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read]. These people that are trying to embarrass the manosphere, which is quite easy, clearly. These people are not morally triumphant. These people are equally as bad, if not worse than the manosphere. And don’t get blindsided by this and fall into some trap where you’re going to take moral, what’s it called? Not legalisms, like lectures. Don’t take moral lectures from these freaks! These people are easily as bad, if not worse than the manosphere people. The manosphere people, a lot of them are not good people. I want to make it clear this next segment is not in defense of the manosphere. I’m not saying that. I’ll explain how you should accurately interpret why this phenomenon exists and how it needs to transmute into something much better. I’ll be back. I’ll just close this little thingy. Two minutes.

 

[2:11:12]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[3:41:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/28/2026 = 34)

DJTriumph
Supporter
18 hours ago
the James Mason podcast was great
11
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
FLmetalhead
12 hours ago
Where is it?
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
3
0

Jaymeo1
12 hours ago
Link ?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

eclipseNF
11 hours ago
Where is it?
1
0

baileyspunts
13 hours ago
Man i love when Sewell streams. White pill every time
11
0

LachlanMD
21 hours ago
L foids
6
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
19 hours ago
Nah. W foids
4
3

Jomaha22
20 hours ago
Every time I see that text “manosphere” I cringe. Where did this analogy came from? Ayn Rand male equivalent?
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
im guessing its the “every single time” crowd
2
0

christophawilkins
16 hours ago
hail
4
0

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
great to see another talk mate
3
0

squatmech
18 hours ago
There never anything wrong with the volume wtf is wrong with these people it’s like if you get kicked out of hundred bars but with low volume…
1
0

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
What’s the 5 hour stream where is it?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
eclipseNF
9 hours ago
Thanks a lot

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
whats gonna get too us 1st, terminator or mad max?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Mad Max. These fuel shortages are serious & AI cannot become conscious – it is built from outside-in, life evolves and self-builds from inside-out.

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
ive never heard of any abbos trying to claiming other abbo land that was taken in their tribal warfare, but the land whites took on the other hand will always be theirs??? and dna shows the have only been here for about 5000 years, coming from india and they were not the 1st people in australia, the originals were eaten by them.
1
0

TRUTH1488
11 hours ago
Where can I find that james mason podcast
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
1
0

Tax_Cow
VerifiedSupporter
5 hours ago
Our boomer parents have been hooked on the TV since childhood and they’ve been soaking up jewish propaganda for so long that they aren’t capable of independent thought. Despite whatever their friends and family say, what the TV says is the bottom line. Unwitting agents of our destruction, professing to be enlightened because they watch the talking heads on TV every night.
1
0

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Tom, im glad you still give Abos a chunk of land as their own country. African americans & native americans are similar. Thats the best way. I like wat you are doing but im softer on nons. I feel that at this point we may have to give all nons a chunk of western nations, as their own nation. Set cameras up and make documentaries on how they make a clean 1st world society to a 3rd world shithole. Juxtapose it with our first world living. This way we will document in 4D why we will never live with them again. We would play multiple weekly reality TV shows akin ‘Running Man’ & ‘Hunger Games’. This would change our culture. Then we will make museums to store these films and all the injustices we suffered with/from them. Especially the lil caps. Then maybe in the future we might decide to conquer them & retake the land, and put them where we want, maybe isntreal? Or put these brown masses in africa, or somewhere low on resources, since they cant mine them anyway. Tom, I also think 90%+ whyte is a good target. Because the good ones that help us have a reason to. But once we have control we can create policies to reduce their breeding over time: a white centred society; they will admire us or leave; we will be re-morale-ized; etc. If they dont want to accept it, they can always leave. Caramel island is an alternate choice for them too.
1
0

birdhouse456
15 hours ago
The problem with “where is the aboriginal land” is that their concept of it completely different to ours. We look at different metrics. They can’t just pick up and move their culture because it’s linked to place. If they don’t want to give that up they will be motivated to go to war regardless. Or, they’ll just be squeezed out and fade away, because once they are away from their territory the culture doesn’t function. Now we have a hybrid that succeeds at neither way. Maybe there can be agreement with some tribes but others will disappear completely. it’s similar to the clans of the Scottish Highlands. The culture survives, but it’s not what it was.

BossLurker
9 hours ago
Parasites and retards

BossLurker
9 hours ago
The whole “in the past they weren’t truly conservative they were only going off inertia” is actually an extremely good point

‹ Hide 1 reply
BossLurker
8 hours ago
Around 59:27

leibekohne
5 hours ago
Tom you have some criticism from USA NS bit-chute or odysee. The abos solution is good. I will give them a bare-bush land without any infrastructure, also they have to create own if needed financial system with own currency. This is about purity and recuperation of race thus Australia + has to be 100% white otherwise there will be no progress.Those idiots want to convert abos and save theirs lives but had no problem with murdering 35.000 white Boers woman and children. Cake destroyed Egypt Greek Roman empires by usury and by miscegenation. 1000 year of Romans were destroyed by 100 years of Christianity=Judaism 2.0= children blood drinking sacrificing cannibalism. Germany were destroyed in WW2 by another stupid and manipulated white men who should know better. White international unity.

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
56 minutes ago
Tom, I emotionally agree to boot out all leftists, or white antiwhites. But something for you to consider: Richard Spencer says that whites can build because we have all levels of people Elites, managerial class & working class. Dr Ed Dutton “white race functions like a bee hive”. So we might need to select the better ones and put in breeding policies to get them to their 15% balance. Because nearly all managerial class are leftists.

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
More and more blackpilled every single day
2
3

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
life is struggle mate, learn to laugh in the face of these demons and keep the sprits of our ancestors lovingly in your heart. heil victory
7
0

trvkvlt
2 hours ago
Thomas Sewell is my rabbi
0
1

drshreddie
6 hours ago
you need a better background, the baby blue with the books isnt working. How about a more masculine color with a NSDAP banner? I know this seems trivial but perception is a big deal and your message is important.
0
4

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Dean McIntosh: Hello there, guys. At the risk of sounding like every other YouTuber out there, I’d really appreciate it if you’d click the subscribe button. It’s free, it doesn’t cost you anything and it allows my channel to grow, which means guests like the one you’re about to watch, as well as more, would be willing to come on! Just give it a like, give it a subscribe and we’ll go from there.

 

All right, thank you and enjoy this episode.

 

So today on Laments, I’ve got Mr. Mark Collett. Mark, how are you doing?

 

Mark Collett: Hello, my friend. It’s good to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me on. I’m looking forward to having a decent chat with you.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, thank you.

 

Now, for those that don’t know who you are, if they were to Google you get some quite derogatory terms come up. People call you, I saw “Hitler Simp” when I was doing my research. I think simping is something to do with OnlyFans girls. I don’t know, I’m a bit old for all that shit! The neo-Nazi, Nazi. How would you describe yourself?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I describe myself as an ethno-nationalist. I’ve always described myself as a nationalist.

 

But now there seems to be sort of two camps. You have the sort of civic nationalists and you have the ethno-nationalists. I’m an ethno-nationalist. I am English, I’m proud to be English. And I believe that White Britons, i.e., the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, they deserve a homeland just like any other ethnic group. And my belief is basically that we as a people need to turn around the demographic changes taking place, because I don’t want White Britons to become a minority.

 

And secondly, I want to ensure that Britain is run by the indigenous people for the benefit of the indigenous people. So I want us to remain a super majority in our homeland and I also want our homeland to be run for our benefit rather than for the benefit of people who are foreign or for the benefit of foreign countries.

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, I’m not going to lie. That sounds like it’s right out of the playbook of Restore Britain. Do you know Rupert Lowe?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I mean, Rupert Lowe is now talking my talking points, because I’ve been doing this since 2000. I’m now 45. I’ve been doing this for 26 years. I first got involved in this when I was at university. And it’s very interesting to see that the things that I was de-platformed from X, for the things that I’ve had my bank accounts taken away for, the reasons I’ve been banned from any form of foreign travel are essentially now the policy points of people like Rupert Lowe.

 

So the things that I face such repression for over my lifetime are now the talking points of a sitting MP. And it tells you that there is a massive vibe shift at the moment. What we’re seeing is this unprecedented political change where people are talking about things that at one point were seen as highly taboo. And it was quite a taboo thing.

 

And as I said, I have suffered sort of quite heavily because of my political beliefs. I’ve been doing this, I’ve been consistent in doing this for the past, 26 years.

 

But now these things are breaking into the mainstream. They are being spoken about in Parliament, and obviously Rupert Lowe’s now got 100,000 members who obviously agree with these talking points, which is incredible because obviously I was in the British National Party at the height it had 14 and a half thousand members. We got two MEPs elected to Brussels, but it was nowhere near on the size and scale of what Rupert Lowe’s doing. Now that doesn’t necessarily mean Rupert Lowe’s gonna win a general election, but what it does mean is that there has been a huge change in the way people think and people’s willingness to talk about race, ethnicity and demography.

 

Dean McIntosh: It’s interesting you mentioned that, actually. I had one of your compatriots or previous compatriots, Nick Griffin on a few months ago. And it gives you the vibe shift, as you mention it. I think that scored 10,000 views at my last check and I had lots of people saying:

 

“Yo, you can’t speak to Nick Griffin!”

 

I got a lot of abuse for it as well. And I thought:

 

“You know what, I’m just going to talk to the chap and get his side of things.”

 

Which is why we’re having this conversation as well. I don’t go by other people tell me, as you’ve probably seen, Mark, you’ve seen my channel. I go by going to the source, go to the horse’s mouth sort of situation.

 

So, yeah, you were part of the BNP, which is why I think you get slated as much as you do. Obviously, as we’ve just said, these conversations around race and ethnicity are now breaking through. You’ve got Rupert Lowe, not sort of spearheading that, but he’s definitely picked up the baton and is running with it. His party is doing very well. It’s interesting, really. He talks about re-migration a lot. He talks about millions must go. I know you know Steve Laws and he’s a big fan of or big, big promoter of re-migration. What’s your view of that? Do you think that we should get rid of everyone that isn’t English?

 

[05:05]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I do believe that millions should go, but I have or both myself and the people I work with have always said we would like Britain to be around 95% White British.

 

And if you stated that as a point, I think that’s something that most people who are reasonable could agree with. We’re not saying that every single person who’s got a tiny drop of foreign blood must go, but lots of them do have to go. And we have to bring about a situation where the indigenous people, these islands, are a super majority and a stable super majority.

 

So we don’t want to say 95%. Then in five years it’s 90%, then in another five years it’s 85%. We don’t want to go back down that road. So it would have to be a figure where the indigenous people were an overwhelming majority and that majority was maintained.

 

Now when we’re starting to talk about people being sort of sent home or expelled or remigrated or repatriated, as we used to call it in the BNP, you know, we’ve got to talk about this sensibly. There are 21 million people here in Britain today who are not White British, who are not indigenous or have some kind of mixed race heritage.

 

Now if we were going down the route of mass re-migration or repatriation as we used to call it, there is a sensible way of approaching this. And we’re not talking about putting 21 million people on boats in a single year and getting rid of them. There would be a system of doing this which would be sensible. It would be, it would obviously take people’s needs into account.

 

So the first people you would send back would be illegal migrants. Because really there are three types of people in this country who are not indigenous. There are people who shouldn’t be here because they’re illegal migrants.

 

So you’ve got the illegal migrants, you’ve got Visa overstayers, you’ve got people who have no legal right to be here.

 

Then you’ve got people who’ve got a legal right to be here but are not British citizens. They are people who are citizens of other countries that have gained residency here, work permits, visas. They might be studying. They’re here, but they’re not actually British citizens. Then finally you have the third group, which are people who are here and are not indigenous to these islands, and they have British citizenship.

 

Now, they’re not indigenous, but they have a passport. They have attained citizenship.

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Now, obviously, if you were to bring in, look, if somebody gave you sort of like Marvel superhero powers and you were sort of Thanos and you could just snap your fingers and these people all disappeared, that would be all well and good, but that’s not how it works in the real world. And there’s a lot of people who say, like:

 

“Oh they’ve all got to go! They’ve all got to go!”

 

But you have to put forward a policy that would actually work. And you have to realise that you couldn’t do this overnight. It couldn’t be done with the snap of your fingers. So you deal with the first group first. And the first group were illegal immigrants.

 

Now, day one, they would all have to go. You would have to start rounding them up, and you would have to start deporting them. They are here illegally. They have no right whatsoever to be here. And they have come here, and by the mechanism of coming here, they have broken our laws. And we do not want criminal migrants here. I think that’s a fair point.

 

Dean McIntosh: Are we talking about the ones coming across on the boats and things like that?

 

Mark Collett: Anybody who is here that has broken the law to be here and has broke, whether you are a visa overstayer, whether you are somebody who has entered on a small boat, whether you are somebody that has Stowed away in on a plane or in a lorry on the Channel Tunnel, makes no difference. If you are here illegally and you have broken our laws to enter this country, you go immediately! So you would deal with the first group with a stroke of a pen.

 

Now, the second group are people who are here legally but do not have right to remain because they’re not British citizens. So they do not have a passport. You would deal with them rather swiftly as well. You would wait until any work visas ran out. You would not reissue them. Any of those people who were here and were not British citizens and that were out of work claiming benefits, they would have to go. You know, why on earth we have people here in Britain who are not British citizens, but they are claiming benefits? I don’t know.

 

I mean, I don’t think you or I would be able to turn up in Japan or Nigeria or India and immediately be able to just go to some government office and start getting free money. So you would then ship them out.

 

Then you would look at people who were here through the Visa scheme or here through some temporary measure who had broken the law. Now, anybody that comes into our house and violates our laws and breaks the laws, they will be leaving.

 

And I think that’s a sensible policy as well. And over time, you would drastically reduce the number of foreign nationals living in Britain, starting aggressively with lawbreakers and people who were claiming benefits.

 

And eventually, over a period of time, people would run down their visas. Those visas wouldn’t be reissued, the foreign nationals would leave. And you would make sure there was no birthright citizenship. So even if they had children on British soil, that doesn’t give you the right to remain. And I know that America has gone down that route recently. Donald Trump has attempting to abolish birthright citizenship because people have these, what are known as anchor babies, which allow them to stay. And that would leave you with the third group.

 

So the first two groups, the illegal immigrants and those here legally who are foreign nationals, you would deal with those two groups extremely quickly, and those problems would be solved. And that would leave you with people living here who are not indigenous and who have British passports, essentially British citizens, but not natives.

 

[11:24]

 

Now, they would be dealt with in a number of ways. We could offer them reasonable grants to leave, and at the same time we could pass laws that essentially bring about something that the government keeps crowing about the government always talks about equality, doesn’t it? We always hear about the importance of equality:

 

“We’ve all got to be equal, we’ve all got to be treated equally under the law.”

 

Well, no one gives me 150 pound an hour interpreter to go to the council office. So we’ll treat everyone with a British passport equally. And if they don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to benefits. If their children don’t speak English, they’re not entitled to go into the educational system, they’re not entitled to state education. If you don’t speak English, you are not entitled to an interpreter in hospitals because all of these things are inequalities which put White Britons at a disadvantage. We pay for these things, but we don’t get these benefits. And that overnight would begin to incentivise people with British passports to take the grants to leave.

 

We would ban full face coverings in public. We would ban kosher and halal slaughter and the importation of meat that was slaughtered in a cruel manner. And overnight you would see millions choosing to go home.

 

And we would also look at people who had British citizenship but also had citizenship of other nations. So if there was a Jamaican man, let’s say, and he had both British and Jamaican citizenship and he had raped someone, he would have his British citizenship stripped. And that would be completely legal under international law, because any nation can strip a citizen of their citizenship if they have citizenship of another nation where there is a grey zone under international law. Not that I’m a big fan of international law, but this actually does abide by. It is if you strip somebody of citizenship and they don’t have citizenship of another nation. So you couldn’t strip somebody of British citizenship if they didn’t have a dual citizenship and couldn’t go anywhere else. But there are many people living in Britain who have a British passport but are dual citizens. And dual citizens that have broken the law, committed benefit fraud, have never worked, don’t speak English, they could have their citizenship stripped.

 

And over time, what you would end up with, it might take five years, it might take a decade, I don’t think it’d take much longer. But you would see a dramatic turnaround when it came to demographics. It would create a hostile environment for illegal migrants. It would more or less cut immigration to zero. And you would see a massive number of people leaving. And over five to 10 years, the demographic shifts would be drastically reversed! And you would also stop paying the people who are here and aren’t indigenous to have children.

 

I’ll give you a great example. Labour lifted the benefit, the two child benefit cap. Well, which three ethnic groups in Britain have the largest family size on average? I can tell you straight off the top of my head and list them in order.

 

Number one, Pakistanis, number two, Bangladeshis, number three, Indians. So people who come here from the Indian subcontinent have by far the highest birth rate and the largest family size. Labour are currently paying them to breed by lifting that benefit cap. By lifting that benefit cap, Labour are putting in place a form of indirect discrimination that pays certain migrant communities to have children. There would also be policy reversals like that again, that would see thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions leave simply because that policy was reversed.

 

And once you’ve done that, you would end up with a small number of people here, 5%, who were not White British. They would be fellow Europeans. There would be a limited number of people of mixed race origin who were half English and say half something else, because they can say:

 

“Well, look, I do have partial English heritage or part Scottish heritage.”

 

Whatever, but it would be a manageable number that was maintained and did not start to creep above that 5% threshold. And then it wouldn’t be discriminating against people like a man who, say, has a Polish wife or, somebody who was of mixed European origin, but their family had lived here for sort of 50, 60 years. And I think that would be fair. I think most people would accept that the idea of sending people home doesn’t have to be one of people marching down the street in uniforms, pulling people out of their houses and loading them into sort of lorries at the point of a bayonet. Sensible policy change would turn this around.

 

And if you extend that, an extension of that, is once you understand that sensible policy change could turn this around, you understand that it is policy change, bad policy, that has brought us to this point. A mixture of horrendous government policy which has created both push and pull factors, has incentivised millions of people from overseas to come to these islands because we treat them as first class citizens and we treat the indigenous people at best as Second Class and at worst a hated minority that are preyed upon by the people who arrive here!

 

[17:25]

 

Dean McIntosh: It does seem everything you’ve just said sounds like it could have come from Restore or Advance Britain. It really does. And like you say, it has crept into the discourse. Yet, what, five, ten years ago you were vilified for these views. Now you’re no longer part of BNP. I don’t think Nick Griffin’s part of it anymore. Do you know Simon Tomlin?

 

Mark Collett: You might want to cut this bit out, but Simon Tomlin, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I don’t edit anything. I do not edit anything.

 

Mark Collett: Well, Simon Tomlin’s a strange guy that has all these fanciful stories of, …

 

Dean McIntosh: Right.

 

Mark Collett: Of what he’s done and where he’s been. He’s written all these sort of strange books. Some that claim he’s an MI5 spy, some that claims he was on the run from MI5. He has these fanciful stories that he was this big player in the British National Party. He wasn’t!

 

In fact, he’s kind of a strange guy. You can look up his criminal history. He was arrested and actually jailed for stalking and harassment of a woman who was in the wider nationalist movement. This can all be found quite easily. He’s not somebody that’s a fan of me. He’s really a Walter Mitty that makes a lot of things up.

 

Dean McIntosh: The reason I ask is obviously he’s got his own podcast. I’m not name dropping anything, but it’s The Daily Agenda, obviously, I’ve seen it. He has mentioned you. I just wanted to know your side.

 

Mark Collett: He mentions everyone. He’s one of these people who is endlessly embroiled in a series of beefs with different people. So he rages about me, he rages about Steve Laws, he rages about Tommy Robinson, he rages about Nigel Farage, he rages about Rupert Lowe, rages about Nick Griffin.

 

Now, I’m not saying all those people like one another. And some of those people don’t. You know, I like Rupert Lowe, I like Steve Laws, I don’t like Tommy Robinson. But he doesn’t like anyone.

 

And if you look into him, you’ll find out that he is a Walter Mitty that lives in sort of this little pocket universe of his own creation. He’s written a load of these really strange books. One of his books claims he has magical powers or something like that. He’s a very strange guy. All of this is on the Internet. You can Google it if you just put in sort of “Simon Tomlin, Eastwood Advertiser”, it comes up with his attempts to sort of get the Eastwood Advertiser to remove headlines about him which relate to his stalking and harassment, which he was jailed for. You know, this guy is not a nice guy. He’s not a good guy. He’s a very strange guy that makes up that he’s had this big sort of impactful career in nationalism. He hasn’t. I never met him when I was in the BNP. He never did anything of note when I was in the BNP, he might have been a member briefly, and he’s fallen out with everybody that you could imagine.

 

So, yeah, he’s not a big fan of me, but he’s not a big fan of anyone.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, no, that’s fair enough.

 

Now, moving on from the BNP, we talked about Re-migration Now, and Steve Laws. How well is Patriotic Alternative doing? That’s your party, isn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: It’s not a party. We are a community building organisation. We believe in three things, community, advocacy and activism.

 

Now, we attempted to be registered as a political party. The Electoral Commission blocked us numerous times for ridiculous reasons. And we eventually, when Nigel Farage came back into politics. Well, when Nigel Farage came back into politics, we were still trying to become registered as a political party and we weren’t allowed to.

 

So we had an agreement with the English Democrats. We gave them our people who wanted to stand as candidates. We gave them our activists in order to leaflet for them. And we worked with Steve Laws and the English Democrats to field a number of candidates at the general election. Almost as soon as we announced that Nigel Farage came back into politics. This was 2024 at the General election. And at that point it was over before it even started. Nigel Farage is one of those people who is a political juggernaut and his involvement in British politics carries so much weight that the previous Reform Party conference, when it was being run by Richard Tice, had around 300 people present. When Nigel Farage got back involved they were filling the Birmingham MNC, you know, one of the conference centres, the Birmingham MNC. Nigel Farage is such an influential and successful man that if you are going to take on populist Right-wing politics when he is active, you are going to be carving out a tiny, an almost, I can call it embarrassing, really, an embarrassing number of votes. You have this niche because he’s going to take everything else.

 

So at that point, we stopped applying to the Electoral Commission. We said:

 

“Let them get on with politics, let them get on with this battle for Westminster, and we will do what we do best.”

 

And what we do best is community building, advocacy and activism.

 

And what I mean by those three things is community building is we hold meetings with, we hold social events, we hold camps, fitness events, and we build an ethno-nationalist community. We carry out advocacy. Advocacy is where we fight for the rights of our people. We raise money for political prisoners, we write to the Prison Service and advocate for the rights of political prisoners. And we take up cases on behalf of people who are of our ethnic group who need our help. So we advocate for the good of our people, for the rights of our people.

 

And the final part is activism. We also go out on the streets. We’re part of the protest movement. We were recently at the large protest in Warwick and we are going to be holding another one of those protests in Nuneaton at the end of this month on the 28th of March.

 

[23:39]

 

So if you, if any of your viewers would like to attend that, we would absolutely welcome them. I am doing that in conjunction with Steve Laws. There was also the National Front there was also White Vanguard, there was also the British Democrats. Other groups who want to attend are welcome to attend as long as they stick to our code of conduct and agree to behave in a reasonable fashion. Numerous speakers spoke there, myself, Laura Towler, Hugh Anthony, Steve Laws, and we are going to build a powerful ethno-nationalist protest movement.

 

So by doing those three things, community, advocacy and activism. We are building something very different to a political party.

 

Now, that means that when Restore Britain was formed, not that it has been formally registered yet, it wasn’t something I was particularly concerned about. Now, I can imagine a lot of people running micro parties were very upset and probably very depressed at the thought of Rupert Lowe starting a political party.

 

Because if you were running a micro party, the day before Rupert Lowe started his political party, you probably thought you were going to hoover up everything to the right of Reform.

 

However, when Rupert Lowe started his party, he gobbled up everything there. And now, if you are running one of these micro political parties that’s got a hundred, 200, 250 members, you’re not going to eclipse Rupert Lowe. In fact, you’re going to be completely eclipsed by Restore.

 

So the political ground now on what you could say the populist Right, has been completely gobbled up by Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe. We, on the other hand, are going to keep doing the things we do. There is no other group in Britain that takes the approach we take. We are very open to working with other groups. The Woodlander Initiative, Remigration Now. We work with people like David Clews from Unity News Network, and we build, and are happy to build a coalition of groups that want to work together for the good of our people.

 

So we’re very open to unity. We’re not trying to carve out some little niche for themselves and get involved in these sort of bun fights that you see a lot of these micro parties involved in. And by basically being unshackled from the electoral process, it allows us to do the things that are important. And it also means that if we feel passionately about something, we can pursue that without having to say:

 

“Well, look, general public, we need you to vote for us. So we have to sell this thing that you probably won’t understand or agree with or believe in, to you.”

 

We’re not really bothered if the wider public doesn’t support some of the things we do. If the wider public doesn’t support our prisoner support program, well, so be it. We don’t have to sell it to them because we’re not going down the electoral route.

 

And a lot of these micro parties are constantly trying to sell things to the British public that they don’t understand or can’t get their head around properly. And then they get 1.2% of the vote. And it’s all been a big waste of everyone’s time and money. And we simply don’t want to go down that route.

 

Dean McIntosh: No, Fair enough.

 

So there’s a big sort of ethnic push from your side of things. I get that vibe. We’ve had a chat about it for nearly half an hour. I understand that. So what about people that aren’t ethnic nationals who say yours, Steve Law’s ideas, contribute to hostility or division of the British society at large?

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s a really, … Well, how can I say this politely? That’s a stupid point to make! And it’s a stupid point to make because the British people were not divided until mass immigration took place.

 

The greatest division between the British people when we were an island nation made up of England, Scotland and Wales was when we played rugby against each other or football against each other. You know, as a young man growing up in Britain, when England played Scotland, it was a big event. When Paul Gascoigne, you know, ran down the middle of the pitch and scored that absolute screamer of a goal. You know, the English cheered and laughed and the Scots cried. And that was the division in Britain.

 

The divisions in Britain now are much greater. And they haven’t been created by White Britons or by ethno-nationalists. They’ve been created by politicians who have brought other ethnic groups here that are so different to us. There is no hope of these people fitting in. They have created a multi-ethnic sectarian society and that has been created by design! That is not the fault of people like me who speak the truth! It is not the fault of indigenous Britons who by and large have always been against that level of mass immigration and that sort of immigration. And there are different types of immigration. But mass immigration from the developing and Third world has been something that the vast majority of White Britons have always opposed in one form or another.

 

The fault for all of this lies at the feet of the politicians who have done this without our consent, against our wishes, and have created this sort of ethnic or racial tinderbox which is now causing so many problems!

 

And when I say that, I’m not just talking about White on non-White. There are multiple different ethnic lines which create divisions. Hindus don’t like Muslims. Shiites don’t like Sunnies. There are different black gangs that murder each other on a daily basis because they come from different postcodes or have slightly different ethnicities and ethnic loyalties. We don’t want any of that here! Britain should not be a battleground for all these different ethnic groups. It should be our homeland. It is our homeland and it should be a place where we feel safe to go about our daily business and raise our children!

 

[30:00]

 

 

Dean McIntosh: You know what, that’s a very interesting point because when I was born in 86, so when I was a younger chap, Whites weren’t Whites. And I say that as a broad term. You know, White, Europeans, English, whichever term you want to use, were the majority.

 

And it seems like things have got progressively worse now. People would say it’s migration. People say it’s the small boats. You could point a finger in many different ways. But what I want to get to is a different point entirely. Going back to my earlier point, doing my research on you before I reached out, obviously they call you all these names and they tied you all these different things.

 

So what’s your view on Israel? Now the reason I ask that is because they charge you with being a Nazi, obviously. See where I’m going with this conversation? But Israel, from what I can gather through my research is, and through people I’ve spoke to out there, is an ethno-religious state where everyone, I assume, everyone is Israeli, jewish. Obviously you’ve got different sects of Judaism in there, but for the most part, Israel is supposed to be like a safe zone, a safe country for jews, regardless of what type of jew you are. It seems funny how Tommy is saying that the Israelis should have a state of their own, an ethno-state, an ethno-religious state, but not the UK. And that we’re like almost like a Brazilian style melting pot. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but be honest.

 

So what’s your view on the Israel side of things? Because it seems like everyone’s okay with that, but when it’s the UK wanting an ethno-state, then it’s wrong.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, this is the greatest hypocrisy of our time. Powerful jews who live in Britain and wield vastly disproportionate power. They’re a tiny percentage of the UK population, but they wield vastly disproportionate power in terms of the number of seats in Parliament, in terms of their influence over Parliament, and the way that they distort both our domestic and foreign policy. These jews wield huge amounts of power. But not only do they wield huge amounts of power, but they do so in a way which is fundamentally not only to our detriment, but also hypocritical.

 

So people who support Israel, especially powerful jews the British Board of Deputies and the little lap dogs, like little Zionist lap dogs like Tommy Robinson, they will tell you all day and all night that Israel deserves to be an ethno-state, that Israel is a place for the jews, that the jews have a right to a homeland, that they have a right to a homeland which they can defend, where they can control their own borders, that they shouldn’t be taking refugees, that they should be able to do what they want to their neighbours. Some people that Tommy Robinson has just met, the disgusting fat blob in America called Randy. Fine. He will tell you that in fact Israel has the right to starve the Gazan children. Disgusting! But these same people will tell you that actually White Britons do not have the right to be a super majority. That we don’t have the right to our own ethno-state, that the English do not have a right to a homeland, that we should share our homeland with everyone else.

 

So the British Board of Deputies will say:

 

“Yes, Israel has a right to defend itself! The British government should defend Israel, we should send money there, we should sell them weapons, we should allow them to do what they want in defense of their ethno-state.”

 

But then when somebody says:

 

“Well look, there’s tens of thousands of illegal migrants coming into Britain every year raping White girls, attacking young men, claiming huge amounts of benefits, living in hotels, huge amounts of taxpayers money.”

 

I think it’s about £8 million a day is spent housing these people in hotels. The British Board of Deputies will turn around and say:

 

“Don’t be so racist! Refugees welcome!”

 

Why? Why is it that these people who support Israel, who support an ethno-state for jews and wield this huge amount of power, are all completely behind a place for jews, but don’t think the English have the same right? That’s a massive hypocrisy.

 

And Tommy Robinson is a scumbag! Tommy Robinson is a guy who will fly around the world campaigning for the rights of jews. But if you ask him, should the English remain a majority in England, he will reel off 101 reasons why black people should come here, Indians should come here. He was outside the Iranian embassy the other day making clips about how he would allow more Iranians to come here because they’re good people, they don’t create problems. Why? Why do we have to be the nation that opens its borders, welcomes everyone in, hands everything to them on a plate, and then watches our own people become a minority, and a hated minority at that, whilst jews get to do the very opposite? And why are the people that advocate for open borders here the same people that advocate for closed borders and an ethno-state in the Middle East? This hypocrisy needs to be called out.

 

And this is why I’m banned on X. It’s why I can’t get a bank account. It’s why I can’t travel to places like America. And it’s why Tommy is making millions of pounds a year! It’s why he travels everywhere. It’s why he’s got the freedom to do whatever he wants. It’s why he’s spending £455 on a T-shirt and £5,000 on a pair of shoes. It’s why his son is traveling around as an influencer on private jets. It’s because if you bow to these powerful jews and you advocate for Israel, you will be paid for doing. So you will be given freedom, you’ll be given the right to do as you please.

 

Whereas if you say:

 

“Hey, there’s some hypocrisy is going on here, you will lose everything like I have.”

 

[36:13]

 

Dean McIntosh: So you called out what you saw as a double standard and, …

 

Mark Collett: Massive double standard! Yeah.

 

Dean McIntosh: And they smeared you as a Nazi and you’ve been de-banked. What countries are you not allowed to go to? You said there was more than one.

 

Mark Collett: 29 European countries plus a complete ban from North America.

 

Dean McIntosh: Just for calling out, calling it how you see this!

 

Mark Collett: For speaking about two things. Speaking about demography, and who controls Britain. Those two things. I speak primarily about demography and I talk about the disproportionate power that Zionists wield in the West. Those are the two things I talk about.

 

And if you look at what’s going on in the world or what has gone on in the world over the last few years, I can tell you this unequivocally, there is no other nation on the planet who would be allowed to indiscriminately slaughter women and children in multiple different countries, kill foreign leaders, starve refugees, and attempt to drive millions of people out of their homes without international condemnation, sanctions, and even military action being taken against them. But Israel can do all of those things, and all we do is send them more money!

 

Dean McIntosh: Right, Okay, I didn’t know any of that. So that’s all a learning point.

 

Mark Collett: You must know that! I mean, look, come on, you’re an educated guy. You must know what’s been going on in Gaza. Look, I don’t want Palestinians here in Britain. I want Britain to be for us, but also I don’t want to see Palestinian children being slaughtered. I don’t want to see aid workers being strafed by Israeli jets, which has happened. You know, how many foreign nations or how many nations on the planet would get away with killing aid workers, delivering medical aid, food and water to women and children and it just be brushed under the carpet?

 

You can Google all these things. Israel is essentially a country that has subverted Western domestic and foreign policy to the point that they have the complete ability to do as they please, even to commit genocide, which the UN has determined that they have done. The UN has determined they have committed genocide in Gaza. Yet America, Britain and numerous other countries are still dancing to their tune and nothing will happen about it.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, so that all to one side. I’ll just put a pin in that for a moment. Do you think, two points to this question. Do you think that the jews should have a homeland, a jewish state of their own? And second point is a lot of people that have come out as ethno-nationalists and Catholics and Christians recently have said that they are Zionists, that they believe that Israel should have a right to exist regardless who lives there, I think it would still exist, personally, but like as it is so do you think this is people just toeing the line and Israel should be there or shouldn’t be there in its current form?

 

Mark Collett: I will say this, and I’ll start this with an interesting point. I have said today at the beginning of this, you asked me sort of about re-migration. I laid out what I believe to be a very sensible, humane and lawful way about ensuring Britain remained ethnically homogeneous and a stable ethno-state. None of that was illegal. None of that was a call for violence.

 

Yet for saying those things, you can be de-platformed. You can have Prevent at your door. You can have the police looking at your social media accounts and potentially arresting you, you can be de-banked. You can have a travel ban put upon you. Okay, for just saying what I said earlier, which I think were pretty reasonable points.

 

Now you have Israel killing children, starving refugees, assassinating foreign leaders, destabilising sovereign nations, arming terrorist groups like Al Nusra Front in Syria, which are just the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda. You know, if you believe that Al Qaeda were the ones that blew up the twin towers on 9/11, why is Israel funding them and arming them and giving them air cover? Because that’s what they’ve been doing. Now I believe that all people all over the world deserve an ethno-state, okay? They deserve their own place in the world.

 

And I’m not saying that jews do not deserve a place in the world. But what I’m saying is, why do powerful jews use their power in the West to silence people like me for saying something reasonable, like I said earlier. Yet they support a state in the Middle East which is committing genocide and war crimes.

 

Now, this is the thing, isn’t it? And what I’m putting to you today is not that jews don’t deserve a place to live. What I’m putting to you today is that jews are creating an ethno-state for themselves whilst denying that right to people of European descent. People like us the English, the Scottish, the Welsh. And isn’t it funny that every single time Israel strikes a foreign nation, Israel was heavily involved in the war in Iraq. Not on the ground, but in the preparations. And this all came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. Tony Blair said that he did meet, you know, leading Israelis who helped America and Britain not with information about important military sites in Iraq, but with making the decision to attack Iraq illegally.

 

[42:11]

 

Now, Israel has destabilised Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and now Iran. They do all this. But where does the flood of refugees and displaced people go when Israel commits these actions or prompts the West to commit those actions? They all come here! So wars for Israel in the Middle East, which help Israel grow, ensures Israel’s power and position in the region, only create floods of human traffic that come into the West. And we pay for it twice! We often pay for Israel’s military excursions. We often carry out their dirty work. And then there is always blowback. And the blowback is huge amounts of people leaving the Middle East and we face the blowback. How’s that a thing? How’s that fair? How does this keep happening?

 

Well, it keeps happening because powerful jews in Britain silence people like me who speak the truth about this. And they pay people like Tommy Robinson pay them handsomely. Tens of thousands, hundreds of thousand, millions of pounds a year. They build up their social media accounts, they fly them all over the world so that it appears that the populist Right in Britain, who should be enraged about what’s going on right now in the Middle East and should be saying:

 

“Whoa! Whoa! We need to back away from this!”

 

We shouldn’t be supporting Israel. We don’t want hundreds of thousands of Iranians coming to Europe.

 

But instead, Tommy Robinson stood outside the Iranian embassy saying:

 

“Oh, no, no, we should let them in! This is great! We’ve got to support Israel!”

 

This is all part of the Greater Israel plot or scheme or plan to create a powerful state for jews in the Middle East. But at the same time, what does it do? It reduces every other sovereign nation to either flames and destruction in the Middle East or here in the West. It reduces them to multicultural states.

 

And once we become multicultural states, once we lack in-group preference, once we are riven with division, our nations, our countries collapse. And it leaves one country in the world towering above everyone else! And that one country is Israel.

 

I don’t want to be ruled by Israel. I don’t want to be ruled by Zionists. I want England to be ruled by Englishmen for English men! And I don’t want to see Western nations belittle more than military puppets for a Zionist regime that cares nothing about White people!

 

Dean McIntosh: That almost sounds like the, what was it? The melting pot, Kalergi Plan?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s what it is.

 

Dean McIntosh: And for those that don’t know, they should go have a look at it. Something about every nation becoming a well, no ethno-states anymore, essentially, wasn’t it?

 

Mark Collett: But yeah, but there is one. That’s the point. So powerful jews in the West campaign for multiculturalism in every Western nation. They pass laws that discriminate and silence, discriminate against and silence ethno-nationalists. They support mass immigration, they support all kinds of policy Reform and social changes that reduce White birth rates. But they do the very opposite in Israel.

 

So there is only going to be one group of people in the world who have a homogeneous, powerful ethnocentric state! It’s not going to be us.

 

Dean McIntosh: So why do you think they’re pushing this?

 

Mark Collett: I think it’s pretty obvious from what I’m saying. They covet power and they want to be the, … They understand that power comes through ethnocentrism. That power comes from understanding in-group preference and understanding that if you have in-group preference and you stand together as a group when everyone else is either divided, atomized or pursuing individualism, your group will be the most powerful.

 

So let’s say you have a room full of a hundred people, 100 people. Now, if there’s a group of 20 amongst that hundred who work together and look after each other and act as a group and always have each other’s backs, no matter what, numerically they are still a minority. They only make up 20% of those in the room. But if the 80% are all bitterly divided and act only as individuals, the 20% can dominate the others. Now imagine that on a global scale, every nation is at war with itself, riven with division. Every nation is, or all White people pursue this individualism. Then ethnic groups come to Western nations and it all gets divided. They all become multi-ethnic sectarian societies where people compete for resources, they compete for money, they compete for a better slice of the pie for their particular group. So they’re all divided.

 

But in the Middle East, there is this one nation that acts for itself, that acts for the good of its people to make sure that it is the pre-eminent state in the region. They have this huge amount of power by sticking together. And we just don’t have that. And largely we don’t have that because policies that the jewish diaspora, both social and legal policies that the jewish diaspora was pushed for in the West, has left us atomized and isolated. You know, our family units have been broken down. People pursue materialism. Rather than wanting to have children. We are all looking after ourselves. We’re all looking after, you know, short term our desire for short term pleasure.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

[48:46]

 

Mark Collett: And if anyone doubts me, right, I think we’d all agree, everyone watching this is probably going to agree that the feminist agenda has been damaging to the family unit in the West.

 

The idea that women should, rather than embrace a man, they should compete with a man and attempt to do sort of male centric tasks to prove that women can do everything. And in doing that, they certainly shouldn’t marry a man or settle down or have children with a man, because that would undermine their individualism, their strength and their ability to show men that they can do it all on their own! Well, who’s pushed feminism? Just go on Wikipedia and type in list of jewish feminists. It’s pages long! Pages! Who brought about feminism? Who’s pushing pornography? Who owns OnlyFans? Look who owns it? Who owns Pornhub? It’s a rabbi! It’s a rabbi!

 

Dean McIntosh: Is it really? I didn’t know that.

 

Mark Collett: Who is pushing all of these things upon our people? Who owns the media? There are charts out there that list all the people. Who writes the books about, “White privilege”? Who are the professors in university that are teaching young White people to hate themselves and to rebel against their ancestors and despise their history?

 

Now, I’m not saying it’s all jews, and I’m not saying it’s only jews that do this. But jews are vastly over-represented in the kind of activities that I’m talking about. And are often people who play roles in these activities that could be described, they could be described as “instigators“. They are people that play central roles in getting movements started that are ultimately detrimental to our long term survival.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay. That’s a lot of food for thought, to be honest. But I just want to bring it back to the point about Western nations being divided. I’ve seen more and more of it as I’ve got older, and I’m 40 this year. And it was never this bad.

 

I mean, yeah, you’d have like the occasional, we all knew some twat who was a bit of a racist or someone who’d make a gay, … There was always someone who had a gay joke or whatever. And I remember, I think we peaked in the 90s where nobody gave a fuck!:

 

“Okay, you’re gay. Oh, I don’t agree. You don’t agree. Whatever. People don’t agree. But okay, that’s your business. Oh, you watch porn, that’s your business. Oh, you’re black, you’re Muslim, it’s your business!”

 

All of a sudden. I’ve seen over the past, call it 15 years, there’s this massive sort of merge of everything being a problem now. Where do you think that has come from?

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s come fundamentally from hate crime laws. It’s come from a huge shift to essentially cencored speech. I mean, what’s wrong with making jokes about gay people? What’s wrong with making jokes about anyone? Because you sure as hell can make jokes about White people! You can make jokes about straight White people, White families, you can make jokes about Christians, so why can’t you make jokes about Muslims? If you make jokes about straight people, why not about gay people? If you can make jokes about White people, why not about black people?

 

The fact is, the policing of our speech has been something that has accelerated drastically, both in terms of legislation through the government and in terms of the way the media have weaponised the idea that if you say something that’s unpopular, you should be hounded, you should be banned off social media, you should lose your job, and you should face social repercussions which are so strong that it leaves people sat in their houses feeling as if they can’t speak their mind and bottling everything up.

 

Now, look if you happen to be gay, which I don’t think you are, …

 

Dean McIntosh: I’m married! [chuckling] To a woman. To a woman!

 

Mark Collett: But if you’re gay and you want to do that in your bedroom, it’s up to you. Right? But why do we have to have grown men walking down the street in bondage gear, performing sex acts on each other on a Saturday in broad daylight in the middle of August, in front of families going out shopping. Why has it gone?

 

Dean McIntosh: Actually, it was the podcaster, Andrew Gold. I met him last year at the Battle of Ideas in London. He actually said, I’m sure it was him. He was at a Pride march, just good to see what it’s like. And he saw two men doing that in the middle of the day.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, but why do we have to see that? What you see, this is an interesting thing, isn’t it? Why has it become normalised? Why have the people in power made it normal for two gay men to perform sex acts on each other in broad daylight at a festival and then termed it “Pride”?

 

Well, again, it’s an attack on the family unit, it’s an attack on decency, it’s an attack on morality, and it’s attack on children.

 

And ultimately, that last point is more prescient than ever, because you can see what they’re doing to our children. It’s constant sexualisation, abuse, trying to get children to accept things which are absolutely sick and twisted!

 

And a lot of this then is all wrapped up in careful marketing. The word “pride, rainbows, love is love”. Well, is any of this good for us? Does any of this make life better for regular folk? Is any of this actually helping? Because they would talk about safeguarding, don’t they, safeguarding children, whilst a Drag Queen is reading to them. And the Drag Queen’s associated with another Drag Queen who’s committed sex offences against children and then goes on to die after having sex with a dog! You know, those are the sort of people that these people say, “love is love”, want your children to be exposed to. And women take this, because one of the core British values, we’re told, is “tolerance”. Well, I say that tolerance is not a virtue, it’s a sickness! It’s a sickness that has been pushed upon us. And many Western people now are afflicted with that sickness.

 

And we need to purge that sickness, and we need to be less tolerant. Because, remember, tolerance isn’t a good thing. You tolerate something that you don’t fundamentally like. You take a walk to the shops and you tolerate the stone in your shoe because you’re thinking:

 

“Well, it’s going to be a short journey and it’s raining, so I don’t really want to stop and take my shoe off and get the stone out.”

 

[55:28]

 

But the stone’s hurting your foot. You tolerate things that you don’t like or that harm you, and you tolerate them to your detriment until you can tolerate them no further.

 

Why is it a virtue to tolerate things that harm you and your family? It’s a virtue because the people in power have twisted everything and turned it against us. Even our core values that now apparently underpin our society are actually evils that do anything but underpin our society.

 

They destroy traditional British society! They destroy any last ethnocentric pockets around the country in order to leave White Britons as isolated, atomized individuals who are then prey to ethnocentric groups brought here from overseas who are handed everything on a plate and often learn to hate us when they arrive here. Because as soon as they get off the boat the first thing they’re probably given is a nice hotel room and some money. But if they start doing some watching of the television or some reading of the books, they’ll soon learn about how the White man is evil, how British people oppressed everyone, how we’re basically demons in human skin that have this great privilege and have been keeping them down for not just decades, but for centuries, maybe even millennia! What is this? Well, it’s a system of not just replacing us, but it’s a system of turning us into a hated minority who are preyed upon by those brought here to replace us.

 

Dean McIntosh: And that’s a very sort of deep point as well. I know we’re sort of getting pressed for time. We’ve got about 15 minutes left. I know you, …

 

Mark Collett: Look, this is why people like Andrew Gold won’t debate me. There’s people like Andrew Gold and Liam Tufts and Tommy Robinson, fundamentally cowardly people. They would never debate somebody like me because I can actually answer what they are saying. I can actually put these points over in a relatively articulate and engaging way. And it’s why I’m so heavily banned. I’m not banned because I’m making ridiculous points. If I was making ridiculous points and I was some kind of racist caricature, I would be on X and I’d be boosted to the moon, because then everyone would laugh at me and say:

 

“Look, this guy is ethno-nationalism. That’s why we don’t want to be ethno-nationalists!”

 

So they get rid of people like me, and then you have people on X who do things in such a clownish way. They’re getting millions of views, but they look like complete idiots and they embarrass our cause. They’ll turn up and do street stalls with two or three people dressed in what looks like a Hitler cosplay outfit. They’re allowed on X and they will get millions of views for doing that because people are laughing at them.

 

No one’s gonna let me go on X and get millions of views because what I’m saying is relatable. And when people do upload clips of me on X, like Jake Shields recently did, they go viral, you know, hundreds, thousands or millions of people see them and go:

 

“Why isn’t this guy on X? I agree with everything he said. How is it I’ve not heard of him?”

 

You’ve not heard of me because I’m basically the most banned man in Europe because what I say makes sense! And anyone that fact checks it the points I’ve made about IDF planes killing civilians and killing aid workers, they’ll find out it’s all true! And then they’ll be like:

 

“Well, why didn’t I know about this?”

 

Well they didn’t know about it because there is an aggressive agenda in place to keep the truth from you.

 

Dean McIntosh: Okay, okay.

 

So what does the future look like? If we could fix things, what would the future look like if, say, I’m a Harry Potter wizard and you’re Prime Minister tomorrow, Mark, what are you going to do to fix the country?

 

Mark Collett: Well, like I said the first thing you do is you’d stop immigration. You would then start a system of repatriation or re-migration. As I said, and I laid it out earlier, you would put in place lessons in schools which taught White Britons to be proud of the great things that their ancestors did. Why is it wrong to have national pride? Why is it right to teach White kids that their ancestors were evil slave owners, when in fact Britain was the one country that on a global level opposed slavery and essentially brought it to an end? So if slavery is the big evil, why aren’t our kids taught, well, you’re actually the descendants of people who ended slavery! That’s what the British Empire did!

 

Dean McIntosh: It did. Yeah, yeah.

 

[59:55]

 

Mark Collett: Instead we’re told:

 

“Oh, your ancestors were White. White people own slaves! You know, self flagellate a little more, White man, hate yourself a little more!”

 

These are simple policies that could turn things around. Repeal the ridiculous hate crime laws, tear down the facial recognition systems, put an end to digital ID, enshrine things like jury trials, have free speech for everyone in Britain, build an ethno-state, a high trust, high IQ, ethno-state for indigenous Britons, where our children are safe to play in the street, where men and women feel safe to voice their opinion when something’s going wrong. Build a country where you have a representative democracy that really represents the people!

 

Why is it a taboo to point out that democracy, which is another one of these apparent “British values”, doesn’t work? How many people are there in Parliament that actually represent our views? 2, 3 out of 650 seats? We just want a better world, and we don’t just want it for White Britons. If you said to me:

 

“Mark, what about other people?”

 

Well, yeah, I want the same for the Japanese. I want the same for the Indians. Let India be an ethno-state! Let Afghanistan be ruled by the Afghans! I was against the war in Afghanistan. If Afghans want to live under the rule of the Taliban, as long as they don’t threaten their neighbours or us, let them. If the Japanese want to live proud, ethnocentric Japanese men and women that honour their ancestors, just let them. Let everyone control their own destiny, live within their own areas. We can trade. We can visit each other. There’s no reason why we can’t have the Olympic Games or the World Cup. We can even learn from each other, if we wish to.

 

But the fact is, good fences make good neighbours! Every group of people, every ethnic group, has their place in the world. But why should it be on the same street here in England? It shouldn’t! You know, Japanese people in Japan, Nigerians in Nigeria. Why should they all be on the same street in England competing against each other for a slice of the pie?

 

Dean McIntosh: Mark, that’s a brilliant, brilliant end to this episode. Thank you ever so much for your time today.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! If people want to hear more from me, check me out on Rumble, check me out on Telegram, check me out on Gab. I mean, all those good places. I produce regular content like this.

 

And if you do give me a sub, I will be very grateful. Thank you so much!

 

Dean McIntosh: I’ll put all the links down below in the description.

 

 

[1:02:09]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/22/2026 = 484)

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Brilliant guest.
In group preference is completely normal around the World. Mankind is tribal. White people are finding this out the hard way.
123

@DMLaments
5 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Can’t argue with a word he’s said. All very reasonable.
88

@Keribou109
2 weeks ago
Thank you for having Mark on
69

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you for watching
11

Hide replies

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Britain, England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland.
63

@HopyHop1
10 days ago
Ireland has the same problem.
5

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
I think Britain is England, Scotland and Wales while the United Kingdom includes Northern Island,
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
most of our ancestors were HUMBLE POOR FARMERS. NOT rich slave owners!
48

@Lakers-u2v
2 weeks ago
Exactly! I hate when you have people like ian wright constantly go on about whote this and white that. It’s our country!! Dont tell else what we have been. Get out of you dont like us.
9

Hide replies

@Benjamin-j5t5u
2 weeks ago (edited)
Mark is a true Patriot who loves his country and it’s people. What is wrong with that. Restore Britain
82

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Maximum of 38 months to next election yet Rupert hasn’t even registered his party.
I can’t decide whether Lowe has been tricked by the establishment to dilute Reform’s vote, or if he just hates Farage so damn much he’s willing to risk another eight years of left wing destruction.
2

@evolassunglasses4673
7 days ago
​ @Veyron1967 Reform have on solutions. Its better we start building something new NOW
2

@manchesterlass600
3 days ago
@Veyron1967 untrue – the application is in and just waiting for approval by The Electoral Commission

Hide replies

@JacksonFairweather
2 weeks ago
Good to see Mark Collett back on Youtube. He has been banned by every platform possible, and deserves to be heard.
68

Hide replies

@PatriotViolet
2 weeks ago
Wow your guest has put into words my every thought
51

@LegendofLovecraft-b7r
6 days ago
Hail Collet!
7

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Mark Collet has ball of fucking steel and deserves ALLL of the respect and ALLLL of the love. We as british people have the duty to protect this man
6

@ayupmeduck5708
5 days ago
Fluent use of the English language is a must, no exceptions.
6

@kevinsavage808
2 weeks ago
Best interview from Mark for a long time. Allowed to speak and answer good questions put to him. Good Interviewer….
48

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly
14

@paulsmith8858
12 days ago (edited)
No, he didn’t challenge him on anything!!!

@kevinsavage808
12 days ago
​@paulsmith8858he didn’t need to, all true, you can’t argue with the truth
9

Hide replies

@Gudha_Ismintis
2 weeks ago
the ‘Frankfurt School’ has a lot to answer for
65

@Wjfiswjei183
2 weeks ago
Oy vey!
26

@nationalist9904
2 weeks ago
Very true, Professor Kevin MacDonald goes over Frankfurt school and others in Culture of Critique. Essential reading to understand how we’ve been subverted
12

Hide replies

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
He’s always on point and a very compelling speaker. It’s plain to see why they make life so hard for him.
72

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
He said AIDS was a kind disease because it targeted gay men and drug users.
3

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Kind AND based then?
13

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
You don’t have to agree with homosexuality, but being that cruel and callous is terrible optics. Most normal people in the developed world are repelled by cruelty.

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 Get over yourself, Princess. There are bigger problems afoot.
7

@johnlondon5516
2 weeks ago
@Costa_del_Artlepool I forgot we only have the capacity to deal with one problem at a time.
Room temperature IQ.
1

@Costa_del_Artlepool
2 weeks ago
@johnlondon5516 The big problem tends to throw your lot off roofs.
5

@EnglishFemale
13 days ago
​@johnlondon5516 be careful you don’t snap your string of pearls
3

Hide replies

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
Great guest. Mark is the real deal as far as I’m concerned. I hardly ever find anything I can disagree with him on.
37

@Occident.
2 weeks ago (edited)
He’s consistent. I shared a stage with him in Darlington back in 2002. He was a young dude, but delivered a great speech. His position has not shifted. He has stuck to his views. Good on him.
19

Hide replies

@tonyaughney8945
12 days ago
Great interview. Mark is a top man.
9

@ScepticalWoman
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is the acceptable face of the views
expressed here. This gentleman was ahead of his time. That time has now come.
17

@shanetomlinson4604
5 days ago
Powell wasn’t listened to, Griffin wasn’t listened to, Lowe is our last chance
2

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
Mark hit the nail on the head though and pointed out that anyone ‘on the right’ espousing Zionist views
, is usually a snake in the grass. I’ve yet to see what Lowe is all about when it comes to Israel.
1

Hide replies

@ThisIsJamesL
2 weeks ago
Proud to have Mark as my friend
13

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
When you know you know.
33

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
I know.
6

Hide replies

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
Great to see Mark getting his say ,talks total sense
10

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
Top man is Mark!
40

@shaunhalliwell7544
2 weeks ago
Been consistent in his views.
7

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
@shaunhalliwell7544 Been consistent in his grifting too. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

Hide replies

@geraldfisher5683
2 weeks ago
Very good interview. Mark talks a lot of sense. We urgently need a policy of Remigration. It is the only way to get our country back.
15

@carpetsonline3718
2 weeks ago
” is this good for Jews” as they break out in a cold sweat….
17

@DrChunkyBiscuit
2 weeks ago
First time Mark has been interviewed by Orson Welles.
29

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Compliment of the day! Makes a change not being called Temu Carl Benjamin
16

@arslongavitabrevis5136
5 hours ago
@DMLaments face-green-smilingface-green-smilingface-green-smiling

Hide replies

@WolvesRugeley
5 days ago
Very interesting interview
3

@fishtherapy100
13 days ago
THIS IS COMMON SENSE. COMMON SENSE HAS BEEN CRIMINALISED. THIS WAS A BOG STANDARD VIEW IN THE 1970’S. I HAVE NOT CHANGED MY STANCE AT ALL.
6

@AJC298
2 weeks ago
Really good interview that. I have a lot of time for Mark and have read his book.
19

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you
5

Hide replies

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
They want to bring back Babylon and rule over it
5

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Dude was born when I graduated highschool. I’ve watched all of this happen since the 80s. Every year it’s worse and worse
5

@BritishNaturalist-vb8hj
9 days ago
Mark makes a lot of sense & only describes the way this Country was during my childhood growing up in the fifties & the sixties.Our leaders have completely betrayed us.
4

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Great Video Paul with the truth.
17

@evolassunglasses4673
2 weeks ago
Everything the BNP predicted, particularly Jonathan Bowden is coming true.
They had a much better understanding of the long-term trajectory of Liberal Capitalism / The Global American Empire/ Z0G than the centre Right.
64

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Met that great man twice in the N/E. Blucher Village in 2006, and Jarrow in 2008. Brillient Orator Smashing fellow.
13

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
​@Occident.A brilliant orator.
1

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
In politics timing is everything.
8

Hide replies

@Dim3nsion_78
2 weeks ago
Labour have repeatedly stated it has been left with a £22bn blackhole in its finances. Yet continues to spend billions on hotels and welfare for migrants. The government could easily cut its expenditure and reduce the debt – but it hasnt. This isnt incompetence, they want the migrants here.
23

Hide replies

@ColtPython22
12 days ago
It’s refreshing to see an interviewer who lets their guest speak without interrupting.
7

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Thank you kindly
2

Hide replies

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
Schools LIE . Schools LIE to children. Schools NO LONGER teach the Truth and Facts.
31

@PaulD330
2 weeks ago
He’s just a nationalist, eth nat is a made up term.
44

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
To be a Nationalist, was to be an Ethno Nationalist. It literally went without saying. However since the controlled opposition Tommy Robinson and others appeared, with their brand if multi-racial (fake) Nationalism, the term “Civic” was coined to describe that movement. Hence we have the two. “Ethno” and “Civic”. Only the former is real Nationalism. The latter is a half measure, a cowardly cop out doomed to failure.
18

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
It’s been coined due to the likes of Tommy or Farage civ nat aka fake nationalists so it helps to distinguish who’s on the side of the indigenous white population that being ethno nationalists
4

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
​ @PpHT9217
Dud you see Robinson and his “Not White” quote. I find that very troubling. And Spanish resident, Paul Thorpe, is exactly the same. All calling for Unity on their terms. Suspicious agenda.
4

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @mesolithicman164 you only need to follow the money who his handlers are ,Steven is a puppet for Jewish Israel interests, he does not care one bit about the indigenous white populations in Europe becoming a minority
4

@anthonygreen7063
13 days ago
Since Blair’s time, we’ve been sold the idea that to be British is to hold a passport and sign up (officially, at least) to ‘liberal’ values, not ethnicity. That’s why we need to disringuish between ‘Ethno’ and ‘Civic’ Nationalism. I say this as a man with a Chinese wife, and two mixed race sons. She is a British citizen, and a good one, but she wouldn’t dream of claiming to ethnically English or British.
2

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago
No. 2 things.
1

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Tolerance is Not an English or Christian value! There is no such thing as British values, that term was coined by Tony Blair!
15

@RosemarieMaders
6 days ago
This person speaks the absolute truth
2

@Ann-u5k5n
10 days ago
The English Constitution is the solution for us all
3

@SerenaJB3
2 weeks ago
Mark is a great person and a true patriot.
20

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
And a grifter. Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.

@PpHT9217
11 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 he takes those super chats to live , like to see how you get on being completely de banked
3

Hide replies

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
We’d prefer not to be rubbed out thank you very much
26

@filled_soda
8 days ago
This comment section fills me with hope.
3

@EnglishFemale
2 weeks ago
If they silence you it’s because you speak truth .
6

@lowbrow
2 weeks ago
Agree with every single word
45

@Stanley_1215
7 days ago
And thats why they’ve silenced him and won’t debate him. He eloquently speaks researchable facts!
I’m ashamed of not caring about politics until the referendum. I’m ashamed i fell for tommy 10 sheckles. I’m ashamed i fell for the smear campains against this man.
I’m glad I have the humility to admit it.
A lot of gen Xers like myself were too busy living hedonistic lifestyles to see beyond the bottom of a bear glass.
Thanks for having the courage that other podcastsers lack. I love anyone who can laugh at themselves Orson Wells I saw your reply
Subbed
6

@DMLaments
7 days ago
Welcome to Laments
1

Hide replies

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
This sounds like what Rupert Lowe has planned.
Restore Britain
33

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
Yes but this is proper..
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
And he’s not far right. He’s just right.
29

1 reply

@julianmorris9951
12 days ago
Hypothetically, if you’re a black man in the absolute middle of nowhere on your last legs and suddenly see three groups of say 50 men, one group is white the other Pakistani and the third group is black, who do you walk towards?????, you would 100% walk towards your own ethnicity and there’s nothing wrong with that
8

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Look at what their talmude says and kaballah
6

@maxhession9797
5 days ago
Fucking incredible to see Mark Collet! Love Mark! Saw the interview with russel brand from 2002 and was woken the fuck up!
3

@andreroswell1561
2 weeks ago
Great interview.
14

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you, much appreciated
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
there are also those with citizenship that came here illegally and are now legal; these must go as well
22

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
If you were born in the 70’s you would have a very different opinion as you would have seen a total collapse of English society!!!
13

@ShamanKyrick
12 days ago
I was born in ’90 and can say the exact same
2

Hide replies

@ClintBeastBud
12 days ago
The guy speaks complete sense and truth fair play to him.
4

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Just found your channel, it poped up in my feed.
The youtube algorithms are working well atm, finding lots of decent channels talking sense.
Great interview
17

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thank you kindly, more interviews due to be released
7

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
​ @DMLaments I have notifications set for your channel so look forward to more discussions.
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
​ @djsioux2265 thank you. There’s a lot more coming, various topics and people
2

Hide replies

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago
The natives can’t afford having large families also no housing to even think about having large families,somehow our replacements seem to have no problem in the UK doing those things with extra help from governments past and present.
18

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
All part of the deliberate replacement policy. One bunch behind it.
11

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@Occident.We node
1

Hide replies

@filled_soda
8 days ago (edited)
I literally just finished Dutton’s review of Naziboy. This popped up afterwards.
Mark’s a legend.
3

@jagi1484
13 days ago
I don’t understand the world has gone mad. All this is two men having a sensible conversation.
3

@BasedSaxon
12 days ago
Always liked Mark
9

@nadimovitch9237
5 days ago
Let’s see if Rupert kisses the wall.
2

@WingBroJoseph
2 weeks ago
EthNats for the win!
29

@myt110
2 weeks ago
Aim high, vote Lowe
7

@NotOnMyWatch-i8n
13 days ago
Does this mean I can’t move to Florida and get given a free house and some cash? Damn! I was relying on that.
6

@johngammon963
2 weeks ago
This is true
14

@waxingmiracle
2 weeks ago
Good chat and discussion thanks.
7

@homebusiness8166
2 weeks ago
Paul, we live and learn, we hope.
6

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
That’s the problem. Everyone has turned a blind eye
2

@endrominastercermilenio642
2 weeks ago (edited)
We are a huge problem in our democracy when people like the guest today, Mark Collet, are cancelled.
I can’t argue against anything that he said. And I am an immigrant that he would like to repatriate!
9

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
He was cancelled a while ago, as well as debanked and is barred from majority of Europe
1

Hide replies

@lisalisalake
2 weeks ago
don’t ignore the absolutely connected and dangerous biblical/religious aspect to all of this…the imposition of noahide law in every nation… jewish sharia if you will…
10

@gabemore1766
7 days ago
It’s a genocide
6

@stuka80
2 weeks ago
man i remember mark colet from years ago. dude disappeared for yearse. im happy to see him again.
4

@stephenparker5241
2 weeks ago
Nationalist are ethnats, but they try to portray them as white supremacists which as far as I can see this isn’t the case
8

@smithjones9130
13 days ago (edited)
It must be frustrating for Mark. 20 plus years he’s been banging this drum & now the overton window has shifted far enough to make his talking points mostly acceptable, he can’t because he’s banned from everywhere.
7

@kirstypalmer33
12 days ago
MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO ME
2

@sparticale1954
5 days ago
36%, 25%, 16%. Better to be an Ethno-Natinolist than the victim of Ethno-Genocide.
1

@cimmerian_savage9736
5 days ago
If caring about the survival of your own race is tribalism, then tribalism is simply the natural, default behavior of any organism that exists in populations rather than as isolated atoms.
A Nation body of people having a common descent, history, culture, or language but without a separate or politically independent territory.
2

@bigjawontour9679
2 weeks ago
Mark came out of the English working class and knows his stuff. One of the only men in the UK who has ALWAYS stuck to his principles.
11

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
Money doesn’t buy you class

@Heimbach1966
13 days ago
He’s not working class. That’s why he’s never had any real traction
PA is just middle class people.
1

@bigjawontour9679
8 days ago
​ @Heimbach1966 after a quick search on wikipedia, I stand corrected. From a middle class town and privately educated. PA do know what is going on rather than being paid up zio shills imo.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@Heimbach1966 Who cares what class he is – Tommy Robinson claims he is “working class,” yet is stinking rich by most standards, shrills for Israel and grifts money of his gullible supporters.
6

Hide replies

@robhunt-watts8908
5 days ago
I liked & subscribed because I too am an English ethnonationalist.
1

@robertlestylo6085
2 weeks ago
Excellent interview. My contribution: the Paradox of Tolerance (Karl Popper – Austrian philosoper). To those unfamiliar: Look it up.
5

@teaattiffanys
2 days ago
Absolutely and we have to be proud of who we are . And thats not another state of Islam we will be another Iran unless we vote Restore Britain. No other party will put the indigenous first
2

@Martine-c3t
2 weeks ago (edited)
So me being a kind English white lady gets called more names as an adult then I did as a child but maybe that’s because as a child everyone looked like me I always wondered why god put us in our own countries?? Could it be because we don’t really get on with each other or does saying that make me a racist?new subscriber
28

@djsioux2265
2 weeks ago
Spot on I hear you as a boomer, we didnt have these issues back in the days!
9

Hide replies

@wobwub8188
12 days ago
Take the first two minutes, how do you disagree or argue with that?! I can’t.
4

@Livinginlanguage
5 days ago
As Mark says – it is PATriotic Alternative. PATriotic (British English) – PATEriotic (American English). When did so many of us come to speak American and why? (Fine, of course, for the Americans.)
2

@CaroleHoward-g6p
13 days ago
Thanks for the video very informative
5

@Pumpemup
2 weeks ago
I agree with everything this man said
15

@TheArtofTheBrave
2 weeks ago
Mark talks a lot of sense, especially his closing remarks. the stumbling block is that certain people would find it impossible to parasitize the populations of western ethno-states, and they will, and do do all they can to prevent that……..
6

@eyemallears2647
13 days ago
This is crazy. How am I struggling to find fault in any of his points???
7

@piercerockwell2588
12 days ago
Why are you trying to go against an Englishman that wants England to be White? What’s wrong with you
3

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Because it’s impossible to find fault with the truth.
2

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
There are no faults!!! Hes spot on with all of it bravo
1

Hide replies

@venx4733
2 days ago
Simon Tomlin is not a Walter Mitty , he is the real deal ….he’s always been a Nationalist….
1

@winstonsmithstaxi
2 weeks ago (edited)
I used to disagree with PA on repatriation and ethic identity stopping non Brits from standing for public office. I have now changed my mind. I will add that while we should try to make change politically, we need to be realistic and accept that a conflict is inevitable
26

@ryan-audax
13 days ago
You think a civil conflict in the UK is inevitable?

@BlueRadleys
6 days ago
Took your time getting there
Followed you for years buddy, hope the family are well.

Hide replies

@stephenwellstriggers
2 days ago
Mark is a legend
1

@YJB8CCFC
6 days ago
All the hatred and divide is being caused by Western Governments and the Jewish state of Israel. The Jews and the west want total control of the Middle East for its oil rich reserves. It’s causing upheaval to the people there, causing waves of migration to the west. That’s the big issue. If we(The west) and Israel didn’t interfere in Middle East politics, they’d all still be there. And this has been going on since WW2
3

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
Yep everything and all our countries have been bought and paid for by them.
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Britsh society. Wtf is that. Currently its based on invasion. Who would want to uphold that.
7

@disillusioneddisappointed
2 weeks ago
The thing that really gets my goat is the lack of any Christian traditions in schools. Lack of respect for Christians in schools. My son being told to hide his cross ,whilst a dominant religion is rammed down their throats constantly,even colouring in geometric patterns handed out to the children are labelled islamic patterns?!?!? well,to me they looked like stained glass window,Church patterns!
21

@johnfused8281
13 days ago
We aren’t a Christian country. We are a pagan country. What does christianity have to do with Britain?
5

@auntsally5683
9 days ago
@johnfused8281 a lot if you look into it, crusades, the national flag, christian names, the law………it is fused with pagan traditions as well.
3

Hide replies

@naedprary1721
13 days ago
makes sense to be an ethnonat
3

@keithswood6205
12 days ago
Good interview and not one unreasonable point. The host was good and I recommend he follows up on the points Mark made about some of the key actors behind every single subversive movement of the last century. Its worldview shaping stuff.
4

@DMLaments
12 days ago
Its on my “to do” list
Thank you kindly for watching

Hide replies

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
I absolutely agree with everything that dear English gentleman Mark Collett has said in this stream, thank you @DMLaments for interviewing him. I am highly educated and have done mass research and know what Mark is saying is true. God bless you and every native British.
28

Hide replies

@DaveRhine-h4g
2 weeks ago
Wow! At about 37:31 the host declares that he doesn’t know about Israel getting away with the genocide of Gaza in sight of the whole world. At this point in time how could you not be aware of that?
10

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Genocide in Gaza??!!

@DMLaments
13 days ago
I dont follow Israeli news
3

@historyandculture6369
3 days ago
@DMLaments Its world news my guy, it’s all interconnected. The way of Palestine will be the way of the world.

Hide replies

@bullseyecooper1739
2 weeks ago
Surely he’s just a “Nationalist”?
This term “Ethno” is pure gaslighting and deflection!
16

@danielarcher1459
2 weeks ago
Mark is brilliant, thank you.
4

@jackdoe4632
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money. Brilliant at grifting.

@danielarcher1459
13 days ago
​ @jackdoe4632 I have been invited to those events too and before you make the payment it states very clearly ‘All sales are final and non-refundable’. Perhaps if you spent as much time advocating for our people as Mark does and less time gossiping you would command more respect, but you come across as petty and deconstructive to the cause.
2

Hide replies

@arslongavitabrevis5136
6 hours ago (edited)
Excellent interview. Mark Collett is a true patriot. He put up with a lot of abuse and harassment, like Laura Towler and Sam Meliá, but carried on fighting. I wish him and PA all the best. Simon Tomlin is a despicable creature who has been abusing and slandering Mark, Laura Towler and many other honourable nationalists. According to him, he is the ONLY decent, true nationalist. He is either a psychopath or a troll working for the government.

@belindakennedy5828
2 weeks ago (edited)
Why would any country feed the ones who attack them,Egypt, Jordan also shared a border with Palestine,but they also closed their borders to Palestine.arabs are not native to those parts either.
7

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
I love this guy!!! This is what Jesus was preaching. Jesus Christ is King and I can’t wait till He is ruling the entire earth again. Come soon Lord
6

@psychodrilla
23 hours ago
Ruperts plan will never happen – the half past twos have bought and paid for all this. Ask Barbara Lerner Spectre!
1

@trance.vault.official
5 days ago
Simon tomlin is a true nationalist look him up
2

@paulmorrisrotga77
11 days ago
Great video, subscribed and here is a comment.
3

@DMLaments
11 days ago
Thank you kindly
1

Hide replies

@Alma-q6m
13 days ago
It is immigration policies. It is immigration policies. Restrict and limit the state. Embrace the free market system. The ingenuity of the Brits is amazing. Get back to the community. Civil disobedience, where you refuse to pay taxes that are working against you.
1

@TheGreatWhiteLight
2 weeks ago
So the right has been completely gobbled up by Tories
6

@mesolithicman164
2 weeks ago (edited)
That was the Tory job, keep the Right out of power. So no room for people like Enoch. Now Farage is tge last attempt to corale the RW vote, but he’s failing. Reform is dropping like a stone.
And Restore is on the way up.
So it needs to keep fools like Ben Habib and Robinson out of the party.
12

Hide replies

@Rusty-Hinge
13 days ago
Came for the Collett interview, left because of the advert volume.
2

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If not for Isreal, the world’s opinion of Hitler and co would be very different.
There are many reports of people welcoming the Germans into their countries. The victors of war write the history books.
22

@Occident.
2 weeks ago
Sometimes it takes 100 years to really appreciate the work of a Painter.
11

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago

@Occident.And sometimes it takes no time at all

@Freyjawitch
2 weeks ago
How did that work out for them?

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
​ @Freyjawitch well how’s it working out for us ?
6

Hide replies

@domestinger8805
2 weeks ago
nationalist = ethnonationalist
you have fallen for the language trick
16

6 replies

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Brilliant guest – I agree with everything Mark says. However I have to say that I find it a very strange interview style from the host – he asks a question for a second time – eg “what would you do on you do on your first day as PM” when Mark has already answered that at length.
2

@DS-it9ef
2 days ago
If we ban halal they will start stealing and slaughtering our farmers cattle and continue to kill our wildlife
2

@DMLaments
1 day ago
So you’d let it continue?
1

@DS-it9ef
10 hours ago
​ @DMLaments no, we need to be more serious with our tactics. They only respect strength. They think politeness and kindness is a weakness. That’s why they have been taking advantage of us for decades

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Power
2

@JaneBarlow-z7y
2 weeks ago
Im not being snotty, but instead of guests why dont you Brits submit FOIA requests to all the city/ town councils in England, Wales, Scotland? Put the heat on them. Make them produce their records, finances, expenditures. And then do this for agencies, govt offices, etc. Talking does nothing. We do this here in America. Its YOUR country and money.
11

@edmundblackaddercoc8522
2 weeks ago
Depends on what you request as to whether or not you’ll recieve the information. If you request information that is ‘sensitive’ they just send you a message saying ‘not in the public interest’ and that’s the end of it, we’re being blocked at every turn.
10

@NoNeed2No
2 weeks ago
Lewis Brackpool has been really good on this, he’s a citizen journalist who makes frequent FOIA requests.
6

Hide replies

@raymondwoods2304
12 days ago
Restore will not harm Reform as Reform is merging with the Uniparty (so leaving the Right/Centre for Restore). Reform is harming Reform because Reform is engineered to fail.

@INCOMING-UK
1 day ago (edited)
Israeli’s are leaving the promised land by boat, they are heading for European countries to claim asylum.
How many are Farage, lowe, Robinson and the flag shaggers willing to take into their homes. Are you going to give them mobile phones, cars and cash ?
Will Rupert and Nigel welcome their votes ?

@Michealst1
1 day ago (edited)
All seems simply basic stuff……Vote Restore….VVOVV Mark has it all vvorked out sounds real good to me.

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
Has Labour government England London tighten up asylum seekers yes it old Thatcher conservative governments immigration policy Thomas it Home office they forced into by England. .
1

@juliemathews5115
8 days ago
It’s kaballah
2

@dandoc5160
2 weeks ago
every 5 minutes there’s an advert ffs
9

Hide replies

@benjaminchadwick3749
6 days ago
Brilliant great interview Mark speaks so much sense..If most the normies could watch this especially the Israel bit it would change so many minds…No wonder the Jews hate him
Great interviewer too letting him speak, asking great awkward questions no one else seems to ask..Great stuff….
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Thank you kindly
More to come..

Hide replies

@paulreader7353
9 days ago
You missed a group there
1

@ThomasBoyd-r7l
2 weeks ago
You going to hustings Glasgow Anniesland yes April 14 6.30 to 8 o’clock . Brilliant content. Edinburgh parliament yes 34 politicians lose their seats jobs. Reform uk party that gained politically. Third place in Scotland politically.

@parade1996
6 days ago
Mark collett the state asset.
1

@DMLaments
6 days ago
Evidence?

Hide replies

@Jimmy-i9g2s
2 weeks ago
If I click the subscribe button it will unsubscribe me!
4

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Thats odd

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments He’s saying he’s already a subscriber. Please turn your brain on.
3

Hide replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
13 days ago
Simon Tomlin doesn’t hate everyone he likes Dean Neil, the traditionalbricklayer. Mark also has a dislike for nick Griffin. Not taking sides, I like both of them.
4

@dd7521
13 days ago
He seems to hate most though.
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Tomlin only likes Dean Neil – so that’s just ONE person – everyone else he hates – Laws, Collett , Lowe etc etc. He has even started having a go at young Charlie Downes and Connor Tomlinson who is not even a spokesman for Restore. When I first came across Tomlin on YT he seemed good but his constant punching right is getting so obsessive and repetitive that I can no longer watch him. Tomlin clearly imagines that he should be the great leader of the right – maybe the fact that he can’t get on with anyone would have something to do with it! Mark by contrast has forged alliances with a number of people on the Right and he is not the only one to be critical of Griffin’s leadership style so he is not alone in that.
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 He offers a paid subscription to “remigration action” which entails people handing out leaflets on remigration…truly a mastermind of politics. Let’s not forget his little plot to takeover the BNP by flooding it with members which went NOWHERE, and was doomed to fail.
2

Show more replies

@PompeyfcPUP1898
11 days ago
​@MayeDaye01to be fair Connor went to israel, I wonder if he kissed the wall? Lowe has also said in a x post a year or so ago that we must defend israel. Im wary of a lot of these people.
2

@Purp00000
12 days ago (edited)
I went off him a while back and I was there since probably his first video, every accusation he dishes out is more like an admission…not to mention his fake “hunted by the police stories” which just exist to make him sound more edgy and interesting. Not to mention his “I have secret information that will come out soon” regarding Nick Tenconi which was just a free to view searchlight article on Nick’s sex life…Genuine, pure, grade A bullshitter. Oh yeah, I still have a screenshot of a comment he deleted where someone criticised his merch for being made in the third world.
1

Hide replies

@gman0068
13 days ago
57:57 who was that

@John-d5y2d
6 days ago
99.9%

@parjau4554
6 days ago
Re: “Jews” wanting all the immigration. Admittedly, this is sort of true but the reality is these are just left wing, mostly atheist, liberals who happen to be born Jewish. Actual Jews do NOT want that!! For a very good reason.
The most important thing for real Jews is Israel. And right now, Israel generally has the support of powerful, armed Western Nations. But mass immigration to the West is mostly coming from Muslim countries which means that the demographics are changing such that in a few years, there will be many Muslims in society and in power. And this huge number of Muslims will influence these Western countries to do what? TO TURN AGAINST ISRAEL. And without Western support, Israel will be bombed out of existence! So, No. Real Jews do NOT want mass immigration!
And BTW, Israel is not a Jewish ethno-state in the way you said. It is 20% Muslim. And these Arab Muslims are full Israeli Citizens.

@puddlestoo1
14 hours ago
I don’t get it. Why would Israel not want any western nation to be an ethno state? With many slowly becoming Islamic states where does that benefit Israel? I would say it does the opposite as their enemy (Islam) would now have acquired nuclear weapons! Makes no sense.

@jamestower4473
2 weeks ago
The opposite is happening
1

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Which part?
2

Hide replies

@tancreddehauteville764
13 days ago
The only issue I have with Rupert Lowe is that he gives the impression of being a gin soaked golf club Tory. He needs a decent, ordinary guy, with a good brain, from a lower middle class or upper working class background to work alongside him and push some of the economic policies to the left, in order to attract white working class voters, especially women. We cannot win without women’ support.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
millions of working class people voted for boris johnson over the socialist “down to earth” corbyn
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
Working class people don’t care about what class you are if they like your policies – they all flocked to Farage back in the day didn’t they! By all accounts Downes and Pitt are more economically to the left than Lowe as a lot of zoomers are anyway so that solves that one.
1

@DebbiejBurgess
12 days ago
Lowe is a fraud

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
Yeah I don’t wanna spend the afternoon with him but I want him to restore Britain. Your point is insinuating people aren’t intelligent enough to vote for the policies he’s offering.

Hide replies

@matthewbazeley2984
4 days ago (edited)
Britain had no division before mass immigration?? Don’t make laugh. The class system is incredibly prejudiced and it’s the elite that gave us mass immigration.
1

@Natalya.57.Volkova
2 days ago
And that is how you dilute relevant discussions allowing enemies to change the subject and win, congratulations
1

@matthewbazeley2984
2 days ago
And that is how you throw toys out of the pram. Maybe take a nap?
If facts and accuracy allow your enemies to win then you are not on the side of truth

Hide replies

@DuruttiVisca
2 weeks ago
Rupert Lowe is a Zionist so not a nationalist
4

@vincemarshall8550
2 weeks ago
I haven’t heard him say that but I did ask him if there was any Zionist financial backing of restore and got no answer
4

@Lothnar5070
6 days ago
Making up crap without evidence is weak. Maybe you can also accuse Santa claus with the same bullshit?
1

Hide replies

@ianoliver3779
10 hours ago
too many adverts on this channel.

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
What about an english man with an asian wife?

@Robin-Chats
2 weeks ago
RUPERT LOWES Restore Britain will make it easier for foreign spouses to come here.. it’s a policy he’s talked about.
7

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @Robin-Chats Is it?

@DC3RejuvationGB
2 weeks ago
​@DJAA21M it’s always about me me it’s , our island and our Eth are being at risk of gn cdcd and you say what about my Asian wiffe
6

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB Yea you got a problem with that, I have a right to know?

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @DC3RejuvationGB I agree with Mark Collett and Rupert Lowe, I am against globalism, I am a nationalist in that I think all nations should be sovereign and embrace their culture, I wouldn’t go to my wife’s country expecting them to adapt to me or expect their way of life declining and their race being replaced, my wife doesn’t expect that here, she was happy to see the union jacks and george crosses being put up everywhere but you have to understand my family is my priority so I need to know about that before I support something, otherwise that would be irresponsible of me wouldn’t it, you clearly don’t give a sh!t about the many people in my situation so get off your high horse
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
I think what Tracy means is there are no organized grape gangs from the Philippines or Thailand or Japan operating in the UK, but there is obviously a problem with organized grape g@ngs operating all around the UK from other Asian “communities” that are so protected by the state we cannot even mention the ethnicity of said groups but here is a clue it starts with Pak and ends with stani
1

@DJAA21M
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z I agree with that but I want to know is my family safe in Mark Collett’s or Rupert Lowe’s vision of Britain?
2

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
That’s what divorce courts are for
13

@francesaquatech3696
2 weeks ago
​ @tyronekelly-e6z
5

Hide replies

@Purp00000
12 days ago
All you need to know about Collet is that he recommended Mein Kampf as a must book to read in an interview.
2

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
My struggle in German. Your point is?
6

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 I don’t really care if you think you have any relation to Germany, I don’t have a particular point here to make..I simply wish to inform people.

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​@Purp00000
Your totally irrelevant in my world also.
5

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@Lion-Roar1 The contents of Mein Kampf and the context of why Collet reccomended it is also irrelevant it seems.

@ooWodensEyeoo
7 days ago
​@Purp00000 Seems like you got ratiod on a centrist channel.. The people are starting to break their shakles.

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
Would you have an opinion on The Communist Manifesto? Genuinely curious
3

@Lion-Roar1
12 days ago
​ @DMLaments
Why should I?

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Lion-Roar1it shows the mindset of a Marxist

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments The Communists are wrong because historical materialism outside of a few select and specific class analysis situations is utterly stupid and inapplicable. It assumes that if you restructure economic relations, human nature will obediently follow. I can’t really give you a whole analysis but that in particular stuck with me. Should you read it? Maybe, I read it to better understand Marxism which I am opposed to.
1

@DMLaments
12 days ago (edited)
​@Purp00000I’ve read both books, just for the record.
I understand Hitlers book getting the flack it does but I dont think it should be banned, or not talked about etc
3

@Purp00000
12 days ago
@DMLaments Me too I agree, books should not be banned. But it’s not like he recommended this book for the purpose of historical insight. He does it because he is a Neo-Nazi – and make of that what you will. I just wish he would stop the deception and just say what he is. That type of thing makes me dislike someone. Dishonesty in politics is never good.

@DMLaments
12 days ago
​@Purp00000when was politics last honest?
3

Hide replies

@Row1and
9 days ago
mark the mi5 agent
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
Evidence?
1

Hide replies

@MagicEZvil
2 weeks ago
He has not called out Nigel Farage for the Grifter he is. Not to be trusted. HIs words do not match the reality of the Reform Policy – ‘Say what is popular to get into power’.
2

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Somehow, I dont think Mark is part of Reform UK..
4

Hide replies

@anniestephenson6296
9 days ago
Oh , please return the wealth that’s been stolen for the last 400yrs .

@VincentComet-l8e
2 weeks ago
Surely, rather than aiming at non-British people, shouldn’t the criteria be whether they have skills we need, will work productively, and also have a Western mindset and want to integrate into our way of life?
1

@dd7521
13 days ago
5% would cover that.
5

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
The bottom line is we need to be at least 95% in order to maintain ourselves as a majority. The emphasis will be on training our own. If we do need some foreigners with very high skills in the interim then they will be included in the 5%. The “integration” fairy tale clearly hasn’t worked and people need to be weaned off that story.
5

@VincentComet-l8e
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Yes, I certainly agree that we have to do whatever is needed, in order to maintain ourselves as the clear majority demographic…

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
What about teaching the needed skills within our education system by making said system work in our favour rather than political indoctrination tripe? Then in a fairly short time the skills needed would be more home grown. Is that not reasonable?
1

@VincentComet-l8e
2 days ago
@julieobrien8252
Of course, home grown talent is far preferable.
But our ‘education’ system is far from perfect and/or functional.
And firmly captured by the Left.

@julieobrien8252
2 days ago
​ @VincentComet-l8e let’s hope the education system is reclaimed to fulfill its proper purpose for the long term prosperity of England.

Hide replies

@g.a.m.b.i
7 days ago
Marks not english, the plum
is Italian buahahahaha
1

@JohnCollins1981
2 weeks ago
Maybe there is a compromise on this?

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
There is no middle ground,we either get the demographic replacement to stop or we die out that’s your choice
4

Hide replies

@Mazen7600
12 days ago
Mark, you have all my respect and admiration!! You always say the things that I think about
1

@jackdoe4632
2 weeks ago (edited)
Simon Tomlin certainly has the measure of Mark Collett when it comes to grifting. I know people who gave Collett money for one of his events, then couldn’t attend due to sickness but he wouldn’t return them their money.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago (edited)
Tomlin is always reciting fairy stories about everyone – so I wouldn’t believe what he says.
As for the donation you mentioned – the events do not have entrance fees – so if someone donates to help set up and organise the event and then doesn’t attend it is not like they bought a ticket – ie the money has been donated for and spent setting up the event so why should it be refunded? Tommy Robinson for example asks for donations to help with setting up his rallies – I doubt if anyone would get the donation back if they asked as the donation is to help with setting it up not attending.
2

@jackdoe4632
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 Except that at the time it was not conducted in this manner.

@MayeDaye01
11 days ago
@jackdoe4632 You are being very vague -there are really only two types of events in politics – as I said marches and rallies which don’t have entrance fees or tickets anyway so as I said if people donate to help with setting it up they can’t expect to get a refund just because they don’t attend and if it was actually something in the style of a party conference then tickets like that are never refundable – if you can’t attend a Tory conference or Reform conference or whatever you would not be refunded.

@jackdoe4632
11 days ago

@MayeDaye01
Mark Collet is on record as saying his is an entirely different genre of politics to mainstream parties.
However, according to what you are saying, there is common ground between him and them when it comes to money eh?
Take note I use the word money and not “donations” because there is a wide gulf, fixed, between the two.
He has cheated far too many fellow nationalists. Far too many times he has treated them with contempt where money is concerned as well as backstabbing one who passed away but he’s not alone in that.
At least now, it’s out in the open. Exactly where he doesn’t want it to be.

Hide replies

@franitfcful
2 days ago (edited)
There’s also Palestinians living in Israel approx 2.1 million research it ! As for knocking Tommy Robinson when you can muster 2 million people behind you then come back to us …when you spend most of your life including solitary confinement in prison for speaking up then best you stop the hate towards him .I hope this man can walk down the street safely without fear of being killed like Tommy faces every day of his life

@Veyron1967
9 days ago
Was with this guy until he said Israel was an ethno-state – it has two million Arab Palestinians living and working there. Or that it never gets sanctioned – it is the most sanctioned nation on the face of the earth – mostly by the 56 Muslim countries in the UN known as the OIC.
Advice: Israel has nothing to do with our governments policies. Once you invoke Israel or joos more moderate Brits will tune out.
1

@DMLaments
9 days ago
So people will tune out because they hear someones ideas they disagree with and or dislike?
3

@Veyron1967
8 days ago
@DMLaments it’s not hard mate, he’s advocating for a more indigenous England, so why bring Israel into it at all? He is diluting the message and giving the ‘refugees welcome’ brigade an opportunity to attack something irrelevant to the argument.
Mass immigration in the UK is the problem, not Israel. People can see what is happening to our high streets so keep the message simple.
3

Hide replies

@DMFS7
12 days ago
Agree with most of what Mark says but he talks absolute bollocks about Tommy Robinson being paid millions of pounds by Israel! Too bad he wasn’t asked for evidence of that claim just to see the arm waving (he doesn’t have any).
Also, he is being very disingenuous when he whinges about being cancelled and debanked without mentioning the “Young, Nazi, and Proud”.documentary in which he “starred”: it is the main reason that he is considered by many to be beyond the pale. It’s a shame because it was decades ago and we all change a lot in 20 years, but there it is and let’s not pretend it isn’t still tainting him.
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago
he’s a loud mouthed fool

Hide replies

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
2 weeks ago
I wish Mark would just go away. He stinks so bad. I agree with most of what he says but he is repellent to most human beings. Please don’t support Restore because you will put people off voting for them. This is our last chance man. Please stop talking.
2

@dd7521
13 days ago
Why does he ”stink so bad” especially when you say you agree with most he said?
3

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@dd7521 I’ve been watching Mark since he was leader of the young BNP and he has been caught several times genuinely supporting an Austrian painter. People are desperately trying to paint Restore with the same brush and we don’t need to give them any ammo. If we want to get any real power we need to get the support of the general public and the truth is that Mark is to toxic for most people. He needs to step aside. If we don’t get this right this time we are finished. I want my country back and I don’t want someone like Mark messing it up.
3

@dd7521
13 days ago
​ @blueberrycheesecakesupremo fair enough, thanks for your reply.
2

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@blueberrycheesecakesupremo He is only “toxic” because the liberal media want to continue the narrative – haven’t you learned that by now? You say you agree with most of what he says but then talk about the “general public” as though you are not part of the general public yourself! The “general public” are waking up and going further to the patriotic right
1

@Purp00000
12 days ago

@MayeDaye01 The liberal media did not force Collet to send death threats to Nick Griffin…

@JohnnyRollocks-v1z
13 days ago
We tried all that with the BNP I personally joined in 1989 been there and done it all still do a few protest now problem with the British people they still listen to scumbag politicians lying main stream media just look at fake farage and his circus
2

@blueberrycheesecakesupremo
13 days ago
@JohnnyRollocks-v1z Yeah I know, Farage is a joke
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
Hes an absalute bell end

@alpine7891
12 days ago
Well you’d better get used to it lad cos the people are finally waking up.
7

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 are you insecure?

@alpine7891
12 days ago
​ @jamesquinn9971 I can’t wait! Honestly, it’s gonna happen, we are going to win and get our country back! Woooohooo
2

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
​ @alpine7891 youl just be forgoten like nich griffen was

Hide replies

@JohnWayne-d6y
13 days ago
The problem in the USA is birth right anchor babies… once they have that birth certificate they are legally American Citizens regardless of where or who they are… what a mess the Democrats have made
2

@PeterFrance707
2 weeks ago
Elon, are you listening?
7

@IrishScouse10
6 days ago
good man Mark great interview
1

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
Why’s the doom goblin saying it can’t be done, he’s sold his soul.
5

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
To the juice
2

Hide replies

@SEKreiver
3 days ago
Collett has been fighting the good fight. Great guest!
1

@MrPopeye007
8 days ago
Mark the brave
1

@Pacex76
2 weeks ago
If i said what i think should be done id be arrested
2

@ArthurShilling-f8c
10 hours ago
Nothing about this should even be considered as unreasonable. In fact, this MUST happen and sooner rather than later. If not, the consequences will be dire.

@VikingSimonStabilis
1 day ago
Ethnonationalist, what does that mean?

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
What about the illegals that arrived and where given leave to remain by the home office.
2

@BasilGanglia-b7g
13 days ago
I thought he was a young Ronnie Browne from The Corries. LOL!
2

@DMLaments
13 days ago
Kenny Rogers
1

Hide replies

@lynnescott6842
2 weeks ago
I’m angloist
3

@niallmurray8654
13 days ago
Well I’m Irish descent born and bred in England and Angloist too
1

Hide replies

@jamesquinn9971
12 days ago
To judge other people on the colour of their skin is pathetic
1

@Multiverse82
9 days ago
No one is doing that character and culture. Skin colour doesn’t come into it.
3

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 to judge people because they have a different back ground is pathetic

@jamesquinn9971
9 days ago
Britain has always had different peoples coming and going the last 2000 yrs has seen all kinds of people , read some history books pal

@Multiverse82
8 days ago (edited)
@jamesquinn9971 but to judge people that inflict harm on others is valid. So your argument is pointless. Your saying we should accept harm and abuse just because if we don’t it’s prejudice. You need your head checked. Do by your standards if it’s someone’s culture to rape children that can’t be judged? If someone’s character is evil that can’t be judged? Insanity!
3

@Multiverse82
8 days ago
@jamesquinn9971 I’m not your pal by any means
2

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
​ @Multiverse82 are you insecure?

@jamesquinn9971
8 days ago
Did your mummy not love you argh poor boy

Hide replies

@damthebloodandlandthirsty
8 days ago
small minded little englander – is he unaware of the brits that emigrated to ‘the new world’ – simply recall anyone with british heritage back = instant 99.9% majority

@WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe
2 weeks ago
Mark Collette is rumoured to be a honeytrap operator to get real NationaIists Iocked up . .
I am of the uItra far right spectrum so to speak.. but I would not trust Mark at all, because he isn’t careful enough.
Please beware of this feIIa because many people say he is dangerous !
4

@AliceEngland-n8w
2 weeks ago
There are many of us that actually know Mark, and those rumours are designed to stop anyone listening to him!
12

@apollo53122
2 weeks ago
What people need to be mindful of are people like this who go around spreading malicious rumours about others.
4

@tyronekelly-e6z
2 weeks ago
Simon Tomlin
3

@MayeDaye01
12 days ago
@tyronekelly-e6z aka Walter Mitty!
1

@aconcernedcitizen6056
2 weeks ago
Why are you listening to rumors Mr “ultra far right”
Have you met Mark?
Have you ever even attempted to join a real world movement?
15

@DMLaments
2 weeks ago
Who says that he is dangerous?
Who says he is a “honeytrap”?
Im genuinely curious, I haven’t read that anywhere
11

@stevestone4346
2 weeks ago
@DMLaments Simon Tomlin. Never shuts up about him.
7

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
How is he getting people locked up? He doesn’t advocate for those things that Simon has led you to believe.
6

@KingHumphrey
2 weeks ago
@alpine7891 Tomlin has said, many many times, that people close to Collett keep getting sent down. Sadly, that is true. There’s Sam Melia, the Longshanks fella and another close friend of Mark’s whose name escapes me at the minute. Now I’d argue that these people have done what they did independent of Mark and made their own choices, but it’s still true that people close to Mark have been sent to prison while him and Nick Griffin both got off and still find themselves free of police intervention. I think that’s because Mark doesn’t break the law.
5

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey I mean, Tommy Robinson has been sent down so should we now believe he is to be trusted and telling the truth
It’s more likely Mark has been careful, but who knows in actual fact. But he seems to be doing a great job in waking people up to real Nationalism. He doesn’t slander people and certainly doesn’t punch right and I’ve never heard him advocate or simp towards NS
And he also tells people to avoid NA.
6

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Yeah it was a very long time ago mate.. He was young and immature and admits he’s embarrassed by it. We really should get past that, we’ve all made mistakes. But he’s doing more to waking people up to real Nationalism.. Now if only he still had his YouTube channel with 100k followers…Oh yeah Simons still got his YT and x accounts hasn’t he.. How strange, makes you wonder
2

@alpine7891
2 weeks ago
​ @WatchEuropaTheLastBattIe Exactly mate

@PpHT9217
2 weeks ago
​ @KingHumphrey they were locked up prior to being involved with Patriotic Alternative, need to get your facts right
3

@ThomasSukhoi
2 weeks ago
Everyone is a fed.
Don’t trust anyone.
It’s hopeless.
1

Hide replies

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and good evening and welcome to tonight’s stream. We are live on Odysee. We are live on Rumble. We are live on DLive and we’re live on Entropy. So you can find me in all of those good places. And if one of those places decides it no longer wants to work for whatever reason, you can hop on over to another. Plenty of options there.

 

So please do spread that as well. Please share the stream tonight, share the links and let people know that this is happening, because this is a very important stream, and I think this is something that people will get a lot out of so do me a favour and share it in places I can’t share it. Unfortunately, I’m not on X, so I can’t share it there. I’m not on Facebook, so I can’t share it there. And I’m not on other mainstream social networks. I’ve shared it where I can. But if you can boost it and share it, I will be very grateful.

 

Now also, if you would like to help me, if you would like to donate to the stream, if you would like to make a financial contribution, you absolutely can do! And I are very grateful to anyone who does that you can make contributions through Entropy, which is linked in all of the live chats, or you can make contributions directly through Rumble. And when I’m not online, so if you’re watching this on replay, you can also donate through Entropy at any time or subscribe at any time through Rumble. A subscription cost just $5 a month. It’s a recurring payment. It’s a very small amount of money, but it makes a great difference to me.

 

And as I’ve said before, if enough people took out subscriptions, I would be absolutely over the moon, because that would really help me out. It’s a small amount to everyone who does it, but to me it makes a great big difference when it all adds up.

 

So you can donate to me now during the stream, and if you do donate to me during the stream and if you attach a message to it, I will absolutely ensure that I answer that message at the end. Because I will do a Q and A, or a Q and A at the end, I’m not just going to do my presentation and leave this. I am going to answer your questions, if you send those questions in. And you can send the questions via Entropy or via Rumble. And I’ll be monitoring the chats through the stream to collect all of them.

 

You can also donate via crypto-currency, all the crypto links in the description below. And finally, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Very easy. You can write to me there. Get in touch with me if you wish to.

 

Now, before we go any further, I’m going to say something that I say every time I do one of these big, more contentious presentations, and that is, can you please listen to it all?

 

Now, I always say this because there are people that dip in and dip out, and unfortunately they’ll hear something that they don’t like or that they find objectionable. But maybe I’m saying that, making an argument and I’m playing devil’s advocate, maybe they take something out of context and they get annoyed and then they send me an angry email or write a comment saying:

 

“Why did you say this?”

 

Please listen to it all. This is going to be a long stream because I’ve got a lot to say, but I think what I’ve got to say will be very helpful to a lot of people. So please do listen to it all.

 

Now the reason it’s going to be helpful and the reason you should listen to me on this is because I’ve been around for a long time. I’ve been around in this movement for 26 years, and I have been actively involved in what was Britain’s most successful ethno-nationalist political party to date, which was the British National Party at its height. And I was involved in local elections and national elections. I was involved in frontline activity and back room activity. I was the leader of the Young BNP, I was the head of publicity, and I stood for election numerous times and did proper campaigns, knocking on doors, speaking to people. I have proper experience of all of this. And I know where things can go wrong and I also know how to make things go right. So I am somebody you should listen to.

 

But also there’s another reason you should listen to me. When I first got involved in the BNP, it was around the year 2000, and back then there was a wealth of older nationalists involved in the BNP that had been involved in the 1970s.

 

So if you were sort of in your 30s in the 1970s, you’d have been in your 60s in the 2000s. If you’d have been in your 20s, in the 70s, you’d have been younger. Some people got involved at the end of the 70s, 78, 79, and these were men still in their prime and they imparted a wealth of information to people like myself, people who are active, people who would listen, people who were dedicated to the party. So I not only viewed things firsthand in the BNP at its height, and I was there for a decade, but I also have a wealth of information about where things went wrong in the 80s, in the 70s, about the factionalism, about the electoral failures, about the splits. And this is very important information. And if it’s kind of lost to time, we lose something that we should all learn from.

 

[05:31]

 

So that’s another important reason to listen to me. Not just because of the knowledge I have, but because of the knowledge that’s been handed down to me.

 

Now, I want to say this as well before we go forward. I’m not going to trash Lupert, … Rupert! Well, that’s a good start. [chuckling] I’m not going to trash Rupert Lowe tonight. There are some people out there who are ethno-nationalists and they are going out for him, and there are people who are civic nationalists going out for him.

 

And I think not all of this, but some of the people who are trashing him, trashing his team, attacking his party, trying to rubbish him, are doing this out of a degree of envy and bitterness!

 

Now, there’s a lot of bitter people in nationalism. There’s a lot of people in nationalism who have what I call “Main Character Syndrome”, where if they’re not the leader, if they’re not the last guest speaker upon stage, if they’re not the centre of attention, they have to cause endless drama, endless splits, start their own party, and then rather be in a room of 10, 12 people as the boss, than they would be in an auditorium with tens of thousands as just a local organiser, or a valued activist. And I sometimes wonder, you know, where these people would have been pre-Second World War, when Mosley was holding his giant indoor speeches, and he still has the record for the largest indoor political rally in British history.

 

And I wonder where these people would be then. You know, there’d be the people saying:

 

“Don’t back Mosley, back me!”

 

They’d be in a corner of a pub somewhere, corner of a smoky pub in the East End, talking to 10 people as Mosley was filling a stadium. And this sort of Main Character Syndrome, this bitterness, this envy, has caused a lot of people over the years to attack those who are more successful, who are better speakers, who are more able to lead. Not because they think that the person who is better qualified, you know, is actually a bad person, but because they’re jealous! Because they’re desperate to be that person and have what that person has. And that’s not just confined to nationalism, that’d be confined to lots of political spheres or found in lots of political spheres. And I’m sure there are, I will mention, some Civnats who are also attacking Rupert Lowe now out of what I believe is jealousy.

 

But I’m not going to be trashing him. So anyone who came here tonight to hear me read out all of his old tweets or talk about his time as chairman of Southampton Football Club or anything like that. That’s not what it’s going to be. This isn’t going to be a character assassination.

 

So, sadly, if you’ve come here for the character assassination, sorry, you’re gonna be disappointed. This is going to be a serious presentation that’s going to last maybe an hour and a half, maybe two hours, because there’s a lot to say. And just to reiterate, we’re going to start now. We’re going to start. But just to reiterate, listen to it all. Don’t listen to part of it, listen to it all.

 

And we’re breaking it down into three parts. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

 

And if you noticed, I use my graphic design skills to actually sort of recreate the fonts using used on the Good, the Bad and the Ugly DVD box set. When I made the graphic, which I was quite happy with, actually, I was quite happy with that graphic. Give myself a little pat on the back there for using my design skills. Hopefully you all noticed that, and if you didn’t, I pointed it out because I wanted you to notice it.

 

Anyway, we’re going to start with the Good. And the Good starts really well! Now, I like Rupert Lowe and I’ve done several streams where I’ve talked about him.

 

Now, if you watch the first stream I did about Rupert Lowe, which was Farage versus Lowe, I pointed out a few things that I was concerned about with Rupert Lowe, a few things that I was a little bit worried about, and I was a little bit critical and said:

 

“Can we trust this man?”

 

Now, I didn’t do that to trash him. I did that because I didn’t know enough about him. And when I hear that a man has come into our movement and he’s got this history of finance and banking and City of London, I’m going to be suspicious. And he’d also in the past done a few tweets supporting Israel. So I put all this together and said:

 

“Look, I can’t jump on this right away with enthusiasm.”

 

But here, several months down the line, my opinion of Rupert has improved dramatically. And I would actually say he is a great man! He seems like a great man anyway. And he’s saying all the right things. And to have a man like Rupert Lowe, who obviously appeals to a lot of people, speaks very well, he dresses properly, he looks the part, he carries himself like a leader, like a man you could imagine being Prime Minister. Having a man like that in Parliament talking, our talking points, should not be underestimated!

 

We have never, ever in the history, or post-war history of this country, had a man like Rupert Lowe in Parliament. Rupert Lowe is the first of openly ethno-nationalist MP we have had! And I am thankful for that! And I’m thankful that he speaks well. I’m thankful that he hasn’t got these skeletons in his closet, that he hasn’t got some criminal past, that he isn’t someone who was tied up in really shady shenanigans as some MPs were or are. He seems like the kind of guy that people could genuinely follow.

 

[11:42]

 

And also there is an air of authenticity about Rupert. And I’ll tell you why. Some people will doubt him, but I think he’s been on a political journey. And the reason I feel that way is if you look at him and you look at the things he’s been saying over the past few months and years, the time he spent in politics. And he isn’t a politician, that’s important. This isn’t a guy who spent his life in politics and has finally got here. This is a man who stepped up at a time in his life when he felt what most people would have felt, that he should have been winding down. The guy’s a multi-millionaire. He could have turned around and said:

 

“Look, I don’t need this. I’ve got enough money to ensure that myself, my children and my grandchildren will be looked after.”

 

He didn’t have to get involved in the fight, but he did! And he got involved in the fight and he started off in a place where, look, many people who are here today watching this stream will have started off. He started off as a bit of a Civnat. He started off as a guy who said:

 

“Look, we need to stop immigration, we do need to deport people who shouldn’t be here, the illegals, etc. But you know, lots of people come here and they can fit in, they can assimilate. And really the problem is that if people aren’t going to assimilate if they’re not going to be like us, they shouldn’t be here. And anyone can fundamentally be British, but you have to buy into who we are and respect us and speak English!”

 

He started off there. And that should be familiar to a lot of people, because a lot of us, not me! [chuckling] Look at the old documentaries, not me! But a lot of people started off there and then came to ethno-nationalism. They went on a journey. I know real people. I know some of our Regional Organisers. I know some of our guys who are our best activists who started off in the EDL [English Defence League], who started off with sort of slightly colour-blind civic nationalism, and they ended up like:

 

“We are being replaced!”

 

And some of these people are our best people. This is a familiar, real journey that gives him authenticity. This isn’t a guy who turned up yesterday and was like:

 

“Hello, fellow ethno-nationalists!”

 

Nor is it a guy who had some bizarre road to Damascus conversion from the Labour Party or the Tories. This is a guy who went on a very familiar, very authentic journey! One that I’m sure many people who are ethno-nationalists today would understand. And I know people, good friends of mine who have been in parties before, like For Britain. I know good people who have been in the EDL. I know good people who have been in parties like UKIP [UK Independence Party], who eventually woke up to ethno-nationalism and came to us. And it seems Rupert has done that. And you can actually track the tweets, you can track the change in his opinion. And I think that is really good!

 

And I think that makes him, as I said earlier, authentic. I think that makes more people believe him. I think that makes more people understand his message and say:

 

“Yes, Rupert, I started off where you started off. I started off at UKIP. I started off as a Right-wing Tory. I started off thinking this could all work if we all just learnt to live together. But now I understand we’re the indigenous people and we are being replaced.”

 

I think that’s going to make people love him even more. People like myself. I’m not saying this to just trash myself on stream or anything, but people like myself are a lot less approachable than Rupert Lowe. That’s not because I’m a bad person or I do anything particularly wrong, but I didn’t really go on that journey. I’ve been sort of sat here talking about demographics since I was 20.

 

But Rupert has gone on this journey that most people will understand. And going on this journey, speaking out, talking about indigenous Britons, talking about the fact that having a British passport doesn’t make you British. He has revitalised this movement. He has breathed new life into the ethno-nationalist movement, which was fragmented, it was fractious! It was a mixture of, if you like, sort of warlords running their own little war bands. And he’s united people behind him. And I think he’s given people hope, genuine hope! I think a lot of people were saying to themselves:

 

“Where do we go from here? Is there any realistic way of gaining power? I don’t want to join a micro party. I don’t want to be in a group that’s small and maligned, where they’re wearing face masks. Where do I go? Who do I support?”

 

You know, people have stood on an ethno-nationalist ticket, are getting 1% of the vote. Then all of a sudden, Rupert Lowe comes out. He says what he’s saying. He says it with authenticity, he says it with this sort of real purpose, and people believe! He’s breathed life into the movement, he’s revitalised it, he’s giving people hope! And it’s no surprise that 70,000 people have already signed up in a week. 70,000 people already! He had 50,000 in the first, 24 hours, another 10,000 in the next 24 hours, and over the next few days he’s had another 10,000!

 

So obviously the growth will slow off, but what a pop to get things started. 70,000 plus members!

 

[17:55]

 

And I’m going to put this into context for you, because I’ve been around the block. The BNP at its height, 14 and a half thousand members. The National Front at its height, 16 and a half thousand members. Even if you put the BNP at its height and the National Front at its height, and you plop them all together, Rupert Lowe’s members after just a week are more than double the BNP and the NF put together at their heights!

 

Now, that puts things into perspective. Never before has a man been able to make an ethno-nationalist message so mainstream! And that’s something we should applaud. That’s not something we should knock. We shouldn’t be saying:

 

“Oh, how can I pick holes in this?”

 

We should be saying, somebody in the chat saying, it’s 80,000. Everyone in the chat:

 

“It’s 80,000. Mark, it’s 80,000!”

 

Well, even better. Even better, it’s 80,000 now.

 

That eclipses the National Front and the BNP put together to an even greater degree. And that’s something we should all be happy about. You know, to say that ethno-nationalism could be more popular today than it’s ever been! Why would we be complaining? Why would we be tearing this man down? Why would we be attacking this man? For the first time in post-war history, we have this powerful ethno-nationalist party which is effectively much bigger by a huge magnitude than the National Front and the BNP put together at their heights. Brilliant! That’s a good thing!

 

And I’m going to say this is a genuine ethno-nationalist party. I’ve said this earlier, but his first tweet, the Restore Party’s first tweet was:

 

“Having a British passport doesn’t make you British!”

 

And what he’s saying here is there is something more to being British than a little booklet, a piece of paper, a rubber stamp on a form. Being British is tied to blood, to ethnicity, to your lineage! It’s tied to thousands of years of history on this soil! That is ethno-nationalism!

 

And I’m disregarding his old tweets and I’m telling you why. Because he’s been on this journey. I’m going to assess him fairly and honestly. He has come out and essentially said he’s an ethno-nationalist. And his first tweet confirmed that. It went against everything that this new “British value system” stands for. It flew in the face of Starmer, who said:

 

“He’s going to go to war with people who say things like that!”

 

He’s effectively gone to war with Starmer. We should judge him on what he does going forward, not his old tweets.

 

Let’s accept he’s been on a journey, he’s come to our position, he’s batting for us, he’s saying what needs to be said. And he is not just pulling that Overton Window by a few millimeters. He is booting that Overton Window as far to the Right as he can! And if anyone jumps up and says:

 

“Well, Mark, what about those tweets? You keep disregarding them!”

 

Well, recently he was asked if he would ban halal slaughter. He said:

 

“Yes.”

 

And people said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

And he said:

 

“Kosher!”

 

And every tweet he has sent, since then, he has said:

 

“We will ban halal and kosher slaughter.”

 

Now, I can tell you this, no Civnat party has ever said that. I remember For Britain and Marie Waters, remember them? Anne Marie Waters would go out campaigning about halal:

 

“Cruel halal slaughter!”

 

But she would never mention “kosher”. When people brought it up and said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

Her answer was always:

 

“Oh, well, this is a much smaller issue. You have to deal with the bigger issue first. The Muslim slaughterhouses are less clean, less sanitary. It’s not just about the slaughter method, it’s about this, it’s about that!”

 

She would do anything to say that she wasn’t going to ban kosher. Rupert Lowe:

 

“No, we’re banning kosher. It’s gone!”

 

Now this is something that jews would regard as “anti-semitic”. Jews would hate this! And no Civnat, Farage, Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, none of them would ever say this! So we have got to give him the benefit of the doubt. And following this, we’ve had his great policy paper.

 

Now, unusually, really scathing of policy papers and it’s usually because they’re written by people who don’t matter.

 

You know, if you’re somebody who’s got 10 followers and you sat in your bedroom and you write a 200 page document about what you’re going to do when you get to power, you come across like a bunch of kids sat in your dad’s garden shed planning on how you’re going to build the moon base, when you get to the moon. You’re not getting there. Not being funny, you’re not getting there! You’re kids! You’re planning on building a rocket and you’re planning it all out and you’re talking about how the moon base is going to operate. It’s never going to happen when you’ve got 10 people and that’s it.

 

There’s no point writing a 200 page piece of policy. You write those kind of in-depth policy papers when you are knocking on the door of power, when you’re in Parliament. They have weight then!

 

[23:50]

 

And this is what I’ve always said, if you go back over all of my old streams, I have been consistent on this navel gazing desire to write:

 

“The best hundred page policy document on immigration, or the Green Agenda?”

 

Waste of everyone’s time. Absolute waste of everyone’s time! Unless you’re an MP and you have some clout. And this policy paper published by Rupert Lowe. Fantastic! Fantastic! One of the best I’ve ever read. You know, you got to give this man a pat on the back.

 

And look, I’m going to be really honest now. This where we are today with Rupert Lowe. 80,000 members, a genuine ethno-nationalist party with an MP at the helm is where we should be. This is where the BNP should have been today. The BNP should be where Restore is today. And if the BNP had had a credible leader, if it had been run correctly, maybe we could have been. But we weren’t. It went down in 2010, it was dead in 2014! It couldn’t really be resurrected then. That was when it was knocked down so heavily in 2010, it never really got up.

 

But the last life left the BNP in 2014, when the last seat was lost in European Parliament, in one of the most humiliating ways imaginable. This is where we could have been, it’s where we should have been, and it’s where we would have been if we’d have done things right.!

 

And looking at this, to me, in some ways it feels like we’ve kind of got this second chance. It feels like many of us felt that the last real chance was in the 2000s with the BNP. And here we are in 2026 and it’s almost like we’ve been granted this second chance, this second chance of a proper ethno-nationalist party. And for that I am thankful.

 

And this is the thing. Rupert has a real credible chance of getting people elected. Let’s not ignore that! He has a real chance of getting people elected. This is not a micro party. This is not a party that has double or triple digit membership numbers. This is a genuine political party.!

 

And this takes me on to another one of the good points of all this. And this is a bit of a patented Mark Collett, “I told you so”. But Rupert Lowe has proved me right over the micro parties.

 

Now, for the past few years, I have said that all of these Right-wing micro parties are a terrible thing! They are a waste of time! They needed to be wiped away. And I’ve also said that they’re run by these narcissistic fools who have to be leader. They have to be the main character in the story. You know, they’ve got a severe case of main character syndrome. And I said these micro parties will never, ever get anywhere. All they will be is these squabbling tiny groups that get absolutely drugged in elections, but keep conning their few supporters into believing that they are one day going to be a Parliamentary party. But Rupert Lowe has just swept them away in the stroke of a pen, he’s destroyed them all. And that’s actually what I predicted. If people look back and remember, I said some time ago that one of the great weaknesses of the micro party is as soon as a man with a bigger following and a larger purse comes along the micro parties are effectively dead. And they are! And this is good.

 

And it’s good because now ethno-nationalists can stop wasting their time. These parties needed to be wiped off the map. They needed to be shown up for what they are. And ethno-nationalists can do proper work now. They can either get involved with Restore. So if you’re in one of these micro parties and you want to get elected, get involved with Restore.

 

And if you want to be part of a street movement, get involved with a street movement. But don’t sit there following some jumped up little failed narcissist around, thinking that your party of 12 people is going to get to where Rupert Lowe is, because you’re not! You know, you’ve spent three, four years getting 250 members. He’s got 80,000 in a week! Let’s be real.!

 

And the reason this is in the good section of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly is because this is a wake up call. This is a slap around the face. It’s a cold bucket of water chucked over your head in the morning that gets you out of bed, on your feet. This is what nationalism needed for many reasons. This has proved me right, which I’m happy about, but it’s what we needed. Our people needed to see and to understand that wasting our time getting 1% in council elections was an absolute farce! It was a humiliation ritual! Let’s draw a line under it and let’s call out any of the people still operating these micro parties.

 

You know, and that doesn’t just count for ethno-nationalists, it also counts for civic nationalists. You know, it’s not just these ethno-nationalist micro parties that are doing it.

 

There’s also David Kurten and the Heritage Party. David, if you’re watching, I really like you. I think you’re a funny guy. I’d have you on my show. If I met you. I’d shake you by the hand. I think a lot of what you say makes real sense, but come on, mate, the Heritage Party are not getting to power. You’ve been eclipsed in less than a week, easily. You know, you’re somewhere there and Rupert somewhere up there. It’s time to close them down. We don’t need UKIP anymore. We don’t need the Heritage Party. We don’t need the NRP or the BNP or Homeland. All these parties have been rendered useless overnight. That’s a good thing. If we’re into politics, if we’re into electoral politics we need to get behind the most likely organisation to win!

 

Because if you’re not behind the most likely organisation to win, you’re actually in a very real way part of the problem.

 

[30:35]

 

Now, I said earlier, this moves the Overton Window, and it does. But it moves it in a way it’s never been moved before. It’s one thing for large groups of people to say things, it’s one thing for people like myself or somebody like Nick Griffin or somebody in the BNP to say these things. It’s different though, even for celebrities. You know, you might have something like John Cleese say:

 

“London isn’t English anymore!”

 

Well, great! I’m pleased he said that. But for a sitting MP to say this and to say this with Parliamentary privilege, this is a game changer! People don’t understand how important this is. We have never had an ethno-nationalist MP before.

 

And this is not just an ethno-nationalist MP, but it’s an ethno-nationalist MP who is independently wealthy, doesn’t need to go to people for funding. I mean, apparently the guy made something like 34 million. I think I heard him say that in an interview of one particular share deal. Well, this guy’s got so much money he could look after his family for the rest of their natural lives. For the rest of his grandkids natural lives, probably his great grandchildren several generations onward, and still fund this party without even noticing the money’s gone. This guy could effectively run a campaign that would easily eclipse the BNP’s best campaign and he wouldn’t know the money had gone. This is a good thing. This is a very good thing for the Overton Window. And it justifies all our points.

 

For years people like myself have been on the outside, locked out, hidden away, not allowed to speak, called Mad Men. Well, we were right all along. And this guy is justifying that. And he’s making our points not from a position of weakness where we make our points, but from a position of strength. And when these points are made from a position of strength and authority, they carry more weight. This is a good thing.

 

But there is one final thing I want to talk about that’s really good! I remember sitting in on Sam Melia’s trial when Sam Melia was stitched up! And I’ll tell you this, the thing the barrister said to him when he was questioning, everything was belittled:

 

“Well, who in the mainstream holds your views? You’re just a madman! The people you look up to are strange people who stream online. No one in the establishment feels this way. You’re so far from the mainstream that you’re a threat to us all, Sam Melia!”

 

Well, if Sam Melia was on trial today, things would be different. Nationalists who go on trial will not be faced with the question of:

 

“Why are you a freak, an outlier, an extremist?”

 

Because you can just fire back:

 

“Well, if I’m an extremist, so is Rupert Lowe, a sitting MP, and so are his 80,000 members!”

 

All of a sudden, this is different. He’s got the level of membership now that the Lib-Dems have. This is massive! And it gives us legitimacy, it gives us protection and it will also change the way the courts, the police and the CPS treat us. Because the things that I’ve been saying on these streams for years are now being said in Parliament. This is good!

 

And anyone that’s poo-pooing this, anyone that’s saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not really this!”

 

Look, forget it! That isn’t going to wash. You can’t argue against the positives of Rupert Lowe. You can’t argue against the way he’s putting over our arguments. And you can’t argue with over the fact this will offer us protection and it will also allow people who were scared to speak, the strength to speak. Don’t underestimate that either. There are going to be lots of people who’ve always felt this way but never said it, because the only person saying it was Mark Collett or Nick Griffin or John Tyndall.

 

But now the man saying is a sitting MP, the former chairman of Southampton Football Club, a multi-millionaire, a farmer, a man of the people! This is important. And it may well do for us what politicians have done elsewhere in the world, for different White countries, White nations, that now are waking up en masse and talking about things they weren’t before, because people in positions of power are saying what the people think and that gives the people strength. All of this is good and I’m hoping it will bring more people to our thinking.

 

Because this is all part of what I would call “The Great Awakening”. All of this is part of a process of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe hopefully millions of White Britons waking up to the reality of ethnicity, race, nation and the importance of bloodlines, lineage and not being replaced! And that’s what we’re all about. Remember, the goal here isn’t to have the biggest micro party. The goal here isn’t to be the last surviving tiny nationalist organisation to rule them all. The goal here is to wake people up, to make change and to ensure a future for our people.

 

And that means either A) making sure we aren’t replaced, or B), making sure that we have communities, that we have our own power bases if we are replaced and become minorities in certain areas of the country, depending on how things go forward. So that’s the good of I think there’s plenty of good there.

 

But with the good, the bad and the ugly, there’s also the bad and the ugly. And we’re going to start now with the bad for everything I’ve just said, these are early days, very early days! It’s less than a week old, and when you’re going through the early days, things always seem good. This is what you would call the honeymoon phase. This is the point where everyone is giving Rurpert Lowe the benefit of the doubt. It’s the point where everyone who wants to believe will think the best of Rupert Lowe. It’s the point where everything is fresh, where we can shoot for the moon, we can go all the way to the top. We can win everything, because we’ve never been tested. It’s like when an army marches off to war singing songs, believing that by Christmas the war will be over. They’re so sure of themselves. And before the first shots are fired, there is that feeling that anything can be achieved. And unfortunately, that isn’t reality. Unfortunately, there is a long fight ahead.

 

[37:54]

 

And at the moment, as we sing songs and march off together talking about how the glorious victory is on the horizon, Restore and Rupert are yet to fight the first battle. The first engagement hasn’t even happened. And whilst the guys marching off under his banner are singing songs now, they might not be singing songs quite as loudly or harmoniously when first contact occurs. When that first battle occurs, often morale changes dramatically.

 

And sometimes the first battle goes well and people will be like:

 

“Mark, I remember your stream when you said when the first battle comes, things may change!”

 

Sometimes you can be on the up. The BNP was on the up for 10 years when it finally got its knock, when it was finally knocked down, when it finally met its match, the damage done was so catastrophic it couldn’t recover. So bear in mind, we are in a honeymoon period. Things feel good now. There’s hope, People are buzzing.

 

But all of that masks problems that lie beneath the surface, that veneer of:

 

“Yes, we can do this! Yes, 80,000! Yes, ethno-nationalism! Yes, great interviews on TV! Yes, that tweet about being British being tied to ethnicity and to a lineage!”

 

All of that is making this honeymoon so good! And people are filled with all this hope. But that’s the honeymoon period. And later down the line, the marriage might not be as rosy as the honeymoon period. And I use the word “marriage” there for a very specific reason. A very specific reason, because Rupert Lowe is involved in a marriage of sorts. Rupert Lowe is bringing together many disparate groups. There are many factions uniting under Rupert’s banner to march off to war together. It is a courage of so many different supporters. You have just to name three. Tommy Robinson, you have Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin, you have Steve Laws and Zoomer. But that’s a toxic brew! That Steve Laws is a great guy, by the way. I’m not knocking Steve here. There are good people, good people supporting Rupert like Steve Laws.

 

But there are people that we wouldn’t like as much. You have the arch super Zionist Civnat football hooligan Tommy Robinson! Who for years has run his grift and worked for Israel. You have Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad who is dipping his toe into ethno-nationalism. But this man was a libertarian. This man was a race blind Civnat who believed that fundamentally anyone could be British if they subscribed to our value system. And you’ve got people like Steve Laws, who is a re-migration absolutist.

 

“Everyone must go! Every last one must go!”

 

Are these people gonna play nicely together? Are these people going to form an organisation together that will be stable? Or are they going to be factional rifts?

 

And like I said, they might all play nicely together on the honeymoon. They might all march off towards that first conflict singing songs together and not holding grudges. But when those first shots are fired and things don’t go so well, will they play nicely then? Will they be still singing in harmony? Will the marriage work when the couple come back from the honeymoon and realise that maybe whilst it was all good when they were sitting in the Bahamas drinking cocktails and enjoying the White Sandy beaches, their relationship doesn’t work as well when they’re back in rainy England in a little box having to do a 9 to 5 job, look after screeching children [chuckling] and keep the house, keeping the house tidy and paying the bills, things change. And things change a lot when organisations go through their growing pains. And I think there’s a lot there.

 

And I said a long time ago on the Farage versus Lowe stream, I said one problem that Lowe may have is he may surround himself. And this exact term I use was with a “toxic witch’s brew” of influencers, grifters and other ne’er-do-wells who all want a piece of him and want to drag him in different directions. And he’s been on an interview already with Sargon of Akkad, with Carl Benjamin. He’s on the Lotus Eaters! Well, how did that work out for poor old Gerard Batten? Remember, there is slight precedent for this. There is precedent for everyone getting behind a new leader to take on Farage. They all got behind Gerard Batten and it was a disaster! It went down like the Titanic. It was the Hindenburg of political experiments. It went down in flames. UKIP were completely destroyed. Nigel Farage stomped them so hard that he won the European election with the Brexit Party and left UKIP without a single seat. And he did that with the vote being split. Don’t forget that.

 

And remember, when you have all these people on board, when you have all of these different groups on board, when you have this witch’s brew, how is Rupert Lowe to respond to this? Who is he going to side with? How is he going to wave away the indiscretions? How is he going to wave away Tommy’s criminal past, his football hooliganism, all of the things that he’s involved in that put normal people off voting for him? And normal people won’t vote for Tommy. Tommy stood for elections and it was a disaster! How is he going to wave away Sargon’s indiscretions? Sargon, the man who famously sent rape tweets to Jess Phillips! I’m sort of quoting the media there. I’m not saying he actually did that allegedly, but that’s what the media said. Sargon’s also had some fruity interviews that people love quoting.

 

Rupert’s gonna have to answer for all of this, but he’s also going to have to answer for other people. If he teams up with Steve Laws, he’s going to have to answer why Steve says that every last person must go, even if they’ve got a drop of blood that isn’t White British. He’s going to have to answer for everyone’s comments.

 

[45:01]

 

And this is one of the reasons I haven’t got involved. This is one of the reasons I didn’t join up, because I don’t want him to have to answer for Young Nazi and Proud and all the things that I’ve said. [chuckling] I don’t want him to have to answer for what Mark Collett has said in the past. Because that’s not fair! And I actually do want him to be successful.

 

But all these people who are jumping on board with him, or some of them might not actually want him to be successful. They might be riding his coattails. They might be thinking, what can they get out of that? And really, you have here a very unstable support base, and you’re already seeing the beginning of infighting between these different supporters. You’ve got the Civnats already saying they wouldn’t sit with the people who support Steve Laws and Zoomer. You’ve got people like Tommy who will want to drag Rupert down the Zionist route. And there’s lots of people supporting Rupert who are ardent anti-zionists. And already they are saying:

 

“We don’t want Rupert having a Friends of Israel group.”

 

There are going to be some serious fractures in this when we get past the honeymoon period. Bringing people together who have such disparate views and who take their, what may be relatively small differences to those looking from the outside in, but they take those differences very seriously. This is going to be hard to manage. Holding his support base together is going to be very difficult.

 

And look, Nigel Farage gets accused of a lot of things. He gets accused of cucking all of the time. He gets accused of selling people out. He gets accused of throwing people under the bus, because he does! Nigel Farage disassociates with people when they use racial slurs or when they express openly Nazi views. He throws people under the bus when people say things which would be perceived as scary or racist. And we all have a go at him for that. We all say:

 

“Look, Nigel, you’re a cuck! You’re a man who won’t stick up for his own supporters, his own party members!”

 

And to that, well, I’m going to say this. Let’s look at both sides of this argument.

 

So on one hand, you hear me going on a BBC interview and I don’t throw anyone under the bus. I defend them all. And I smile and laugh in the face of the BBC reports. I’m like:

 

“I’m not kicking this guy out. He’s my friend. He’s got a right to his opinion! So what if he said this? I don’t care!”

 

And I can say that because I’m Mark Collett and I’m in charge of Patriotic Alternative. But Patriotic Alternative is not an electoral party. We are not a party that has to do well in elections to continue doing what we’re doing.

 

However, Nigel Farage is in charge of Reform. And Reform is graded on one thing alone. It’s graded on its electoral success. That is what every party is graded on. There is nothing else. It’s electoral success or nothing. I’ve said this before. There is one thing worse, sometimes for political parties than losing. There’s one thing worse than losing an election, and it can be winning an election. Because when you win an election, you have to do even better at the next election.

 

And that was one of the problems that hurt the BNP. I always remember the BNP started doing really well and then everyone expected it to do even better at the next elections. Sometimes it did. But when the BNP stumbled and things didn’t go so well, people left, people abandoned the party, people got dispirited and walked away. The problem with winning in the short term is you raise the bar for yourself. It’s like basically saying:

 

“Well, I want to be the world record high jumper. I want to be the best high jumper in the world.”

 

Well, at first it’s easy because you’re getting over the bar with relative ease, but the higher you jump, the higher you have to jump to keep impressing people. It’s the same with party politics. And Farage, he may be a cuck, but when he goes on television, people can’t credibly call him a Nazi, or a racist. When he goes on television, he doesn’t have to answer for what 2, 3, 4 dozen people have said on Facebook and Twitter because he kicked them out. And yeah, he’s a cuck, he’s a cuck!

 

But I remember when I was in the BNP, and I remember every time there was an interview, every time Nick Griffin went on an interview, Nick Griffin had to answer for what dozens of people had said. He had to answer for Mark Collett and Young Nazi and Proud. He had to answer for Tony Lecomber and Tony Lecomber’s ill spent youth where he took a oversized firework to a Left-wing bookshop with the intention of blowing it up. You know, they called him Tony the Bomber Lecomber!

 

And I’m not having to go at Tony, but what I am saying is Nick had to answer for him. Nick had to answer for me. He had to answer for numerous people. I remember in the run up to one of the local elections, one of the newspapers ran a headline called “All Women All Nazis” and it was basically a front page that pictured all the women who stood for the BNP that had said or done slightly fruity things.

 

[50:59]

 

And then somebody has to go, whether it was Nick Griffin or Simon Darby. Somebody has to go on TV and answer that. And it meant every one of your interviews was maybe 20 minutes long. And it was 15 minutes of answering:

 

“Well, this Nazi said, this racist said this!”

 

And it made the party far less electable than it could have been. Now, to the credit of the BNP, we stood by our people and we didn’t cuck. But the party doesn’t exist anymore. Nigel Farage does cuck. And it’s very hard for them to call him a racist, or a Nazi. And because of that, he’s far more electable. Because the British people are scared of terms like racist and Nazi. People say:

 

“Oh, well, I’m not scared of it anymore. People are less scared than they used to be.”

 

Well, maybe not. But this does make a difference. And I’ve been there, I’ve seen it, I’ve lived it, I know it! And this brings us to the next point. And people are going to be very upset that I’m saying this, but this is a warts and all breakdown.

 

Let’s discuss the Nazi question!

 

At some point, Rupert Lowe is going to be held up, and he is going to have to answer for someone in his party who has supported Hitler, who has called somebody a racial slur, somebody who said that they wish the outcome of the Second World War was different. Maybe somebody who said:

 

“Well, we need a man like the Austrian painter today, because if he was going to invade Britain today, I certainly wouldn’t be Manning the gun turrets. I’d be pointing him all the way to Downing Street!”

 

People will say that! They say it in Reform, [chuckling] so they’re gonna say it in Rupert Lowe’s party! Because Rupert is going to take a lot of people that Reform wouldn’t take. That’s a fact. And Rupert Lowe is going to have to go on TV at some point and answer for people in his organisation that have said things like that, in his party that have said things like that. How will he react? Will he cuck? I don’t know. Will he not cuck? I don’t know. But I’ll tell you one thing. When people go down this party political route, the pressure to sell out and to cuck and to chuck your friends under the bus is huge! Because there’s always somebody stood behind the curtain whispering in your ear:

 

“If you just get rid of them, people will get on board! If you just stop saying this, people will get on board! If you just remove paragraph 2 of your statement on deportation, people will get on board! If you just get rid of your forced repatriation policy and make it voluntary, people will get on board!”

 

And the BNP went through that. The BNP dropped things. The BNP dropped its forcd repatriation policy under, was it Nick Griffin or was it John Tyndall? I can’t remember. I think it was Nick Griffin and the forced repatriation. Yeah, it was under Nick Griffin. Nick Griffin dropped the forced repatriation policy because it was deemed to be unfair, unjust and the public couldn’t get behind it. He said:

 

“Look, we do need people going back, but it has to be done on a voluntary paid basis! A voluntary paid basis because we can’t sell to the people that we’re going to go door to door dragging people out the house.”

 

This was Nick Griffin in the BNP. So what’s Rupert Lowe going to do? How’s he going to answer these questions now? My answer is, I don’t know! I can’t tell you, because I can’t. I’m good at making predictions, but I don’t have a crystal ball that gives me the exact future. But when he’s on TV, when he’s got that desire for more members, when he’s got that desire for an extra 0.5% on the vote, when he wants to go even mains more mainstream than he has, the pressure will be poured on him. Nigel Farage caved into that pressure and it has undoubtedly worked for Nigel Farage. The BNP didn’t, we didn’t. We were more hardcore, we were more principled. We stuck by our people. And PA absolutely sticks by its people!

 

But the fact is the BNP never achieved what it could have achieved. Two MEPs was the high point. A member of the GLA. All we ever achieved was big wins in proportional representation elections. We never won big First Past the Post elections. And that’s going to hurt people’s feelings! But it’s true! Look it up! You can get mad at what I’m saying, it can upset you, what I’m saying. You can download the video, but what I’m saying is true!

 

Now, as I said earlier, this is why I haven’t joined.

 

This is why I don’t want to be involved. I support the guy, I like what he’s saying. But if Mark Collett got involved and Rupert Lowe had to answer for what member number 80, 256 said, and member number 80, 256 said:

 

“I’m drawn to a racially pure White society!”

 

I said that in an interview with a newspaper when I was in my early 20s, probably about 20 years old, maybe 21. I said on TV, I made jokes about things that I probably shouldn’t have joked about. They were silly, they were crass, they were embarrassin, looking back on them! I don’t want Rupert to have to answer for that. And I don’t want him to have to, every time he goes on TV they say:

 

“Well, what about Mr. Young Nazi and Proud? What about him, eh? What are you gonna do about him?”

 

But he’s gonna have to do that with someone else, and thankfully it ain’t gonna be me and we’ll see how we react. But if I was a betting man, which I’m not, I’d say there’ll be more cucking than a lot of people now will like to think there will be. Because the allure of power and the allure of going mainstream is usually too great for most people. And once you’re in that party political sphere, even if you’re the BNP, there is some cucking!

 

[57:23]

 

Now, the next point of the bad is, can he actually succeed with this ethno-nationalist argument?

 

Now, I was talking about this earlier night on PWR with Hugh Anthony. There is this sort of feeling that as things get worse, which they are doing, as more migrants come here, more people are going to vote for an ethno-nationalist alternative. And that might be true, but as more migrants come here, inevitably there is more integration. There are 21 million people living in Britain who are not classified as White British, so have some kind of migrant background. And unfortunately this is a hard pill to swallow. So get your glass of toxic blue energy drink, get your cup of tea, whatever you need to help you swallow the pill, because it’s coming.

 

Unfortunately, many White Britons are more bothered about how they will be perceived by their one non-White friend, non-White family member, non-White work colleague, than they are about the future of their own race.

 

This is because we have this suicidal empathy. We have a problem as a people. We are more bothered about the feelings of our one of the one non-White outlier that we like than we are about the future of our people. Now that’s not the people here tonight, that’s not the people watching this stream because we are the die hard ethno-nationalists, the people who find Mark Collett on Rumble and Odysee, even though he’s banned on everywhere else. But we are outliers. And Rupert Lowe has got to sort, has got to sell that to the public. Can it be sold? Yes, there are more people than ever angry about immigration, but there are more people than ever before with mixed race family members, with nephews and nieces and grandsons and granddaughters and daughters who have married black men and sons who have gone to Thailand and brought back a Thai bride. There are more people than ever before who have a non-White friend. These are problems that Rupert Lowe will have to face.

 

And why am I saying this? Why am I bringing this up when I talked about it the other night? I’m bringing this up because there’s a lot of people who support Rupert Lowe’s that are real ideologues and say:

 

“Look, not one drop, not one member, not one person!”

 

Well, I’m going to tell you now, Rupert Lowe will have non-White people in the party. Rupert Lowe will have people standing for him who are not White British. That is going to happen. And this is going to be interesting because there’s a lot of people in our movement, there’s a lot of ethno-nationalists who have said over the last few years:

 

“Look, there’s Farage with another non-White candidate. There’s a Pakistani candidate standing for Reform, there’s an Indian candidate standing for Reform, there’s a White woman standing for Reform. And look, she’s got a black husband and three mixed race children!”

 

There is a real likelihood that Rupert Lowe will do this as well. And at this point, how are people going to react? Are people going to say:

 

“Yeah, we’re going to forgive that.”

 

Or are they going to react to him in the same way that they reacted to Farage? Are they going to react to him in the same hostile way? Are they going to start calling him a cuck and nagging him and throwing mud at him? Or are they just going to get their head down and carry on? Because this is going to happen.

 

And it’s going to happen for several reasons. Because firstly, I don’t think Rupert Lowe is a racist. I think black man came to Rupert Lowe and said he wanted to stand for him. I don’t think Rupert Lowe would have a bad word to say to him, number one.

 

And secondly, it would be illegal to stop those people coming forward and standing as candidates anyway. And if you were found to be stopping candidates from standing solely on the basis of their race, you’d be in big trouble and your party would likely be deregistered and you would be facing a massive lawsuit from the Equalities Commission. So this is going to happen. How will people deal with it? I don’t know!

 

Now the next thing I want to talk about, which is the bad, is how Rupert is going to sell re-migration. And this is a big issue because, look, I believe in re-migration, but I’m not one of these people who goes around parroting “re-migration is inevitable”. Remigration is absolutely not inevitable.

 

And when you look at what Trump’s done in America, the few deportations that have actually happened over there, the hostile environment that is perceived to have been built against migrants, it’s actually scared the crap out of lots of White people! At one point, Whites were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to do some deportations!”

 

You see one Somalian family on the news with handcuffs on being led off, and all of a sudden, half the White people who wanted deportations are terrified! You got people like Joe Rogan who were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to sort this country out! Oh, my God, Trump’s going too far. This is like Hitler 2.0!”

 

What I’m saying here is Rupert Lowe has to not only get over the Nazi issue, the cucking issue, has to bring all these disparate groups together and make them play nice, but he also has to sell something that does, to some degree, scare people. And when it gets implemented and people see the reality of it scares some people who voted for it. And I’ve likened this to making an omelet. There are people out there that will go to the chef and say:

 

“I want an omelette. Please make me a large omelette!”

 

And the chef’s like:

 

“Sure.”

 

Starts breaking the eggs.

 

[xx:xx]

 

And then the guys order the omelettes in tears:

 

“Oh, what are you doing? What are you doing? They’re breaking all these eggs. It’s bloody terrible. Stop breaking the eggs!”

 

“But you wanted the omelet.”

 

“Yeah, I want the omelette.”

 

“Well, I need to break the eggs.”

 

“But I don’t want any eggs getting broken!”

 

You’d be a madman. But that’s how White people behave. I’m not talking about you guys in the chat. I’m not talking about the good ethno-nationalists here. I’m talking about the people who’ve been infected with the disease of suicidal empathy. Look:

 

“There’s a load of migrant rapists down there. Deport them!”

 

“Right, let’s get the handcuffs on, boys.”

 

“What are you handcuffing families for?”

 

“Well, you said deport them.”

 

“Well, there’s a woman there who’s been handcuffed.”

 

“Yeah, she’s the wife of one of the guys that was raping the little girls, and she helped cover it up. She gave false evidence in court.”

 

“Yeah, but she’s a woman and she’s pregnant. Oh!”

 

“So what? Get rid of them!”

 

And you’ve got to remember Rupert Lowe again. They should have gone in the good section, is a principled guy. One of the reasons he fell out with Farage is both him and Farage agreed that people who had groomed and sexually abused White girls must be deported. But Rupert went further and said:

 

“We’re not just deporting the ones who did the grooming and committed the crimes. We’re going to deport the communities and the families that were accomplices, that covered for it, that sheltered this, that knew about it and didn’t report it to the police.”

 

I agree with him! Brilliant! Amazing policy. And Farage. Screw you for not supporting that! Screw you, Farage, for being a sellout! But unfortunately, re-migration is not inevitable. It’s a hard sell at times because our people are so bloody weak! This is an issue. It’s an issue he will face.

 

And it’s not just an issue when it comes to the ballot box. It’s an issue when it comes to people like Tommy Robinson. When it comes to people like Sargon. What’s Sargon gonna say if Rupert Lowe says:

 

“We need to start handcuffing families.”

 

You know, just the other day, Tommy Robinson was outside the Iranian embassy talking about how we need more Iranians here because the Iranian community, community in Britain is brilliant! Well, no, it’s not. No, it’s not, Tommy! Iranian nationalists and Iranian nationals living in Britain are 18 times more likely to be arrested for sexual crimes than White British men. 18 times! We don’t need them here. Tommy would be crying. He’d be weaponizing his supporters. If Rupert Lowe really embarked on a proper campaign of re-migration, a lot of his support base, their knees would start trembling, because we have a mental disease as a people! Our empathy, which should be solely focused on people within our group, has been spread to everyone!

 

So now we’re more empathetic to other people than we are our own people. We have more empathy for the communities that do horrible things to us than we do to the White victims of those foreign communities! Now, what I’m saying is not a lie. It’s true. This is how it works.

 

Unfortunately, Rupert Lowe is going to have to overcome this. And this is not just a problem he’ll have to overcome with the electorate, but with people within his own ranks.

 

Now, the final part of the bad is this. 80,000 members, it seems like a lot, but the Green Party have over 170,000 members, and they only get 9% of the vote. He’s got less than half of what the Green Party have got. What’s that going to get him? 4%? Maybe more, maybe less. I don’t know. People might say they’ll end up with 170,000 members by the next general election. Great! But 9% of the vote wouldn’t cut it. Maybe getting one or two seats nationwide. A lot of what we’re seeing now is talk on social media, talk on YouTube, and it can be a bubble! It can be this horrible situation where you think you have more support than you do.

 

I remember and I’ve spoke to Steve Laws about this today. He’s given me permission to use this as an example. I’m not negging Steve. We’re going to talk more about this later, actually, but I’m going to introduce this now. Steve Laws, hundreds of thousands of followers across different social media platforms, yet when he stands in election, he gets just over 1%.

 

Now, that’s not to knock Steve. Steve’s a fantastic guy! And Steve bloody deserved to win those elections. He’d have made a great councillor and a great MP. But often you can have millions of followers, you could have thousands of people sign up and you can think everything is gonna go well. But it doesn’t result in much. Tommy Robinson can put 300,000 people on the streets, but when he stood in election, he got nowhere. He failed dismally.

 

Gerard Batten, look at all the influencers he got on board. Look at the social media imprint he built. Absolutely smashed! Things that happen on X don’t necessarily transfer to the real world. It wasn’t that long ago that the Homeland Party were being bigged up and everyone was like:

 

“Look the re-migration is going to begin soon!”

 

They got trashed. They got the most embarrassing results any ethno-nationalist party has ever got in local council elections. And that was when everyone was talking them up. The problem is, we get so close to this. We get so when you’re so close to something and you focus so much on something that’s right in front of you, you can’t see the big picture.

 

[1:09:17]

 

And also, when you’re close to something, perspective makes you believe it’s bigger than it really is. You end up only speaking to the people who tell you:

 

“Well, I’m voting for you, mate. I’m on board. This tweet’s got 40,000 likes. That’s going to get us over the line!”

 

It doesn’t work like that. It didn’t work like that in the BNP. Back in the day you could get a meeting going in part of Leeds and there’d be so many people that there was standing room only. You would be out on the street, people would be beeping their horn. Everyone was voting for you down the Working Men’s Club. And you got 20%. And labour won the vote with like 45%. They won it easily.

 

The problem is you don’t speak to everyone. You speak to people within your bubble. And when it comes down to it, there’s going to be all these pressures. There’s going to be these disparate supporters. You’re going to have the dirty members, the Nazis. There’s going to be pressure on him to clean his party up. There’s going to be pressure on him. There’s going to be the kosher money, the jewish influence.

 

Now there’s people like me who’ve been doing this for 26 years. I’ve never cucked! But where am I today? [chuckling] I mean not to rubbish myself, but I’m nowhere. I’m sat on Rumble and Odysee, you know, streaming to 500 people! Now that’s what not cucking gets you. I can go to sleep with a clean conscience and a smile on my face because I’ve never cucked, and I’ve always talked about the important things. But I’m not getting elected to Parliament, am I? And this is gonna be a big issue. Men are easily corrupted! And at the moment he’s doing a good job of not being corrupted. But when he gets the tap on the shoulder, are we going to see the purges? Are we going to see the multiracial candidate slates? Are we going to see the Restore Friends of Israel? I hope not. I hope not! He is going to have to do some of those things. He will have non-White candidates, but I hope he doesn’t go down this route that I’ve just laid out.

 

But I think to some degree he will because he’s going to be pulled in that direction by people who are part of his supporter base. And that supporter’s base is somewhat of a toxic witch’s brew.

 

So that’s the bad! So are you guys ready for the ugly?

 

Because there is an ugly.

 

And what is going to be the ugliest part of this is the fight between Rupert Lowe and Restore and Nigel Farage and Reform. That fight is going to be the most bitter and horrible thing you can imagine. There will be all sorts of dirty Tricks. There will be stolen membership lists, there will be people emailing people using those membership. There’ll be all sorts, all sorts of nasty games!

 

And I’ll tell you this now, the bitterness and the hatred between those two parties will eclipse the bitterness and hatred those two parties have for Labour and the Tories. Restore and Reform will spend more time fighting each other than they will fighting the Reds. And I know this because I have seen splits in nationalism. I’ve lived through them. I’ve seen the hatred they build.

 

And we saw this when Homeland split away from PA, there was people in Homeland, and I’ve been told this by an ex-Homeland member who I met the other weekend and reconciled with at the Warwick demo. And he said to me:

 

“One of the things that never sat easily with him was the amount of people in that organisation who spent the majority of their time creating fake profiles to spread rumours about PA.”

 

They spent more time doing that than they did actually campaigning for Homeland. That’s one of the reasons it failed.

 

There was one guy who was particularly bitter and nasty and he would spend his evenings ringing around our young members saying:

 

“Look, I know you’re gonna stay with PA and I’m cool with that, but I just I’m not saying you should come to Homeland, but PA are going to be banned in two weeks. We’ve had a big tip off, and I’m just letting you know because I don’t want you getting arrested and being part of a banned organisation!”

 

Well, that never happened. But that’s the kind of horribleness that goes on. And when that horribleness goes on, it doesn’t actually benefit either of the parties that are engaged in it.

 

In fact, most people who are exposed to that kind of infighting and negativity will end up just leaving the movement altogether. They just leave both parties because they didn’t get involved for that. Most normal people don’t get involved to be embroiled in this horrible, horrible infighting! That’s just how it is.

 

And unfortunately, we’re already seeing that because people have been celebrating all weekend:

 

“There are new Restore Party councillors. There are new., …”

 

Well, they’re not. They’re just Reform Party councillors that have gone to Restore. There hasn’t been a single new Restore Party candidate voted in, not a single actual victory. All there’s been is Reform going to Restore.

 

[1:14:58]

 

So the number of populist Right councillors has remained exactly the same. People are just saying:

 

“Oh, well, we took some off you. We didn’t take seats from the Labour Party.”

 

Restore haven’t got three new councils elected and cost Labour three seats. Restore haven’t just taken a council away from the Tory Party and actually smashed part of the establishment. All they’ve done is pull people away from another populist Right party. And the anger here, unfortunately will be aimed more at Nigel Farage and what Reform are doing than it will be at Keir Starmer and what Keir Starmer is doing.

 

And this totally mirrors what happened in Russia when the Bolsheviks came to power. The Red Army was a united force. The White army wasn’t. The resistance to the Bolsheviks was disunited. The generals wouldn’t talk to each other, wouldn’t share information with each other, wouldn’t work together, wouldn’t fight alongside each other because they all had these little problems with each other and they lost. Rather than standing together as one. They were eaten piecemeal by the Bolsheviks and crushed. And what did that lead to? Well, we all know, and as I said all of this fighting will cause more people to drop out than it will to move over to other organisations.

 

Just look at what happened in the National Front. The National Front split in 1980 and it became the New National Front. There was another split in 1986 which became the Flag National Front. You know, at certain times there were actually two National Front paper sales on the same street in the same city centre selling a paper that talked about exactly the same issues. And the public would have been like:

 

“Didn’t I just see you down there?”

 

“No, no, they’re a totally different organisation!”

 

And that bitterness, these internal strives, these fights are things that weigh the movement down. They weigh the movement down and what they end up doing is putting more people off. Because look, we’re not normies. The people watching this stream tonight, we are not normies. That’s just not who we’re not people who have come to this movement as normal sort of hanger on people. I’m not saying we’re all weirdos or anything, but we’re just not normies. We’re not part of normal life. We, we’re deeply political people, so we’re going to stick with it no matter what. But normal people who say:

 

“Look, I’m finally getting involved!”

 

They don’t get involved to hear about infighting and that.

 

“Actually this guy over here who’s standing for this party, that’s kind of like us, he’s the real bad guy!”

 

They hate this! And this always happened in the BNP. Whenever there was any infighting, the people who emerged as the winners, always emerged to rule over a depleted and damaged organisation. That’s just how it is.

 

And whilst this war is kicking off, whilst Restore are going toe to toe with Reform, actually the opposite’s happening on the Left. The Left are sticking together. Labour are going into partnership with the Greens to lock out a populist Right-wing government.

 

And what we’re seeing here is at a crucial time in our history, the Right-wing, which is often prone to these splits, is having one of these splits. And the ugliest part of this is Restore could actually end up stopping Reform from winning a general election. They could fight each other to a standstill or Reform could stop Restore. They’ll end up fighting each other to a standstill.

 

Now, let’s have a look at this. Let’s have a look at reality. In 99, 2000, we made up, White Britons, made up 90% of the population in Britain. By 2024, 2025, we made up 70% of the population in Britain. Over 25 years, a quarter of a century, our share of the population declined by 20%, 0.8% per year.

 

Now, I believed that the last real chance to turn things around was the BNP in the 2000s.

 

But we’ve been thrown this last, last chance now. And that’s what was being built at the last, last, last, last, last chance we’ll ever have! But I’ll tell you this infighting could blow it and it could grant Labour five more years of power.

 

Now, look, if we went from 90% to 70% in 25 years, well, 25 years from now, we’ll be a minority. And five more years of Labour would take us to 2034. We’d only have 16 years left.

 

And at that point we’d have more immigrants voting against us, more people married to immigrants, more integration, more people who are depressed. It would be harder to do it further down the line. The closer you get to a minority, the harder it is to do it. The more multiracial, the more multicultural you become, the harder it is to do things.

 

I was looking at the next general election and I had three objectives at that next general election. And I honestly, I wanted Reform to win the next general election general election. And I wanted them to win for three reasons. Not because I love Nigel Farage, not because I thought that they would bring about a government I would actually want to see, but for three reasons.

 

Firstly, I wanted them to smash the old parties. I wanted them to mortally wound Labour in White working class areas. And I wanted them to destroy the Conservative Party for good. Because the Conservative Party has been the party which has held nationalists back post Second World War. Every time Nationalist parties have got big, the Conservatives come in, talk about little bit about immigration, everyone goes and votes for them and we have lost. That is always how it has worked! I wanted them smashing!

 

The second thing, I thought Farage might have slightly slowed out a climb down. I need to buy us time. We need to buy us time. Somebody needs to buy us time. We’re on the Titanic. Water’s coming into the ship, right? We may not be able to save the vessel, but imagine if less water was coming in. That would be a good thing because it buys you time to get people to the lifeboats.

 

[1:21:20]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:00:35]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/21/2026 = 446)

Mark Collett
7 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

1
0
Konstrukt
1 hour ago(edited)
Do we :
1. become ethnically self-conscious like our ancestors all other groups now living here and start acting in our own best interests?.
Or
2. continue to pretend we have no rights or grouo interests, cede more and more Power to invading , exclusive foreign groups and wonder off without a peep into the long dark night.

Pria’s Thoughts
2 hours ago
Mark i feel you are being completely vindicated. i found you guys about 7 years ago and its been quite a ride. you have never wavered. you and Laura and Joe and many others have been put through hell when all you were doiing was telling the truth. its knackering. just swatting away the idiots on X is knackering but years of plugging away, sharing evidence, setting out arguments, changing minds is coming to fruition. the genie is out of the lamp and it isn’t going back. Rupert is the man we need. more than ever. He seems like a good man. the more we support him the more confidence he will get. i will never forget everything you and PA have done up until this point.

1
0

@GazChamberz
2 hours ago
Schlomo of Akaad

1
0
Hide replies
Konstrukt
1 hour ago
Saegon of Moszad

1
0
Alice1488
2 hours ago
I’ve come to have respect for Rupert Lowe. I think he’s genuine though time will tell. I don’t think he’ll split the vote, I think he’ll win at the election if we all put our faith in him and take a chance on him!

1
0
Collatz
3 hours ago
At some level it’s good Steve is out there, but Mark would make a far better and more balanced representative w/in Restore for genuine ethnonationalists. Ngl I’m massively trepidatious seeing Rupert’s history over the last two years, but if it’s to be I can only hope he and PA have the strongest voice possible in its growth.

2
0

@RonP1
3 hours ago(edited)
A few obvious questions for Restore.
What is your opinion regarding that little State in the Middle East
What is your policy regarding Jewish influence on British affairs
What is your policy regarding Secret Societies
What is your plan regarding Britain’s foreign-controlled monetary system
As Arnold Leese correctly said, Democracy is Death by Jewry.
The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.

3
0
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
“Democracy is Death by Jewry.”
As if we had democracy. The truth: Actual democracy would be the death of Jewish power.
“The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.”
Exactly. We have plutocracy, not democracy.

1
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 hours ago(edited)
That’s what the quote is saying,
Democracy is Death by Jewry, Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry & it will lead to your death.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago(edited)
“Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry.”
The version of “democracy” we have is NOT democracy. Or anything even close. Jewish culture and mentality is elitist, totalitarian, intolerantly exclusive, predatory and fiercely supremacist, thus profoundly anti-democratic. What we have had is, as I said, plutocracy, not democracy. We have fraudulent stage-managed pseudo-democracy with real power exercised from behind the scenes by capitalist elites – with Jews as the dominant element among the elites.

0KT0BER
4 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago
goodnight all

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
G’night all good white people.

1
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Where is debate with David Clews and Alek Yerbury to be found?

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
14
nighty night!

Sir Trancealot
5 hours ago
14

jm
5 hours ago
it was a good stream, very well

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/2024620452639830224

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Nights folks

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Hail Victory o/

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Thanks Mark

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
I enjoyed last hour

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
Great show thanks Mark

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
lol okay

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
no i’d miss things

JamesL
5 hours ago
musk has banned me several days ago

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
What if we put all backs on the moon. Total dark side of the mmoon

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
just refresh

withey
5 hours ago
i had to pause the stream i’m on a time lag

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
We need to put a black man on the moon so he can scatter chicken bones on the surface.

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
“another man on the moon”? lol

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
The one that gives superhuman strength.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@withey
“blue milk”

withey
5 hours ago
it looks like the sci-fi drinks in films

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that would be better – lol

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
I’d like to see them lose something else.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Looking forward to the day the Tory party is destroyed and hundreds of Tory traitors lose their seats

2
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@USSA
Shameful.

God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
we bomb the shit out of their country and then give them free healthcare zz you can’t put your hate on them

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
haha

@MilosM.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Never saw that one in a while.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago

@SOA
No Remorse.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
copy that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck%27s_Brewery

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Dafuq is that blue fluid? You’ll getting poisoned, Mark.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s another bait monger just ignore

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
makes me*

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@VesselofGrace
Sorry buddy, I don’t believe your Jew God. If you believe that makes me dull and your enemy you have bigger problems to deal with than me.

1
0
God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
I do think white people have used their supremacy for more evil than good and we need to balance it out. God loves all people

0
3

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Becky? Beckie?

0
1

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I don’t know that, but I think that’s pretty known by now, I mean for someone interested in the Bible and Christianity in general.

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that wasn’t promised it was inferred, and we didn’t get real brexit, it was brino

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
a beer!

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Collett is one of the few who wouldn’t ever sell out. Easy to trust someone like that

3
0
Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Failure to use TheHolyChristianBible against SatanicJeews would be Idiotic and Subversive.

1
1
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I can’t believe Farage is still politically relevant after lying about Brexit telling people that the $250 million will go to the NHS.

1
0
Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
People need to stop caring about the “magic book” theory. It doesn’t change people, in fact it actively hurts whites’ racial preference. Stop caring about the Bible and start caring about your family (your people).

1
0
withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
of course it doesn’t matter, but it would be intereing to know to get an idea of what was at play and why

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
The whole Barbour jacket, black ‘lab’ & Ye Olde chocolate box village aesthetic are exactly the same as Farage was doing 10 years ago. Lowe is just as phoney and his politics stink. Thatcherite guff mixed with Muslims! Muslims! Muslims! Rhetoric. Count me out as a member of the Tribe once said…

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Eh, historians and theologists, I guess.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
but who wrote those sources?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
eh… no. All sources point he translated the bible from hebrew to the greek. The first who did so. I think he is most known by that.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
get Russell on the show Mark, he needs a promo lift these days lol

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
definitely

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I prefer 1933 politics

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark, I asked you a question in Telegram DM.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
wasn’t greek the lingua franca of the time so surely the jews wrote it in hebrew and greek?

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
Lots of people who should know better are jumping in with both feet. The level of naivete is hard to fathom…

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
a jew who passes as a jew is a jew, it all boils down to aesthetics and mindset

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Reform will be worse because the Zionists funding them will tell them to persecute real nationalists…

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
M C

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Apostle Paul. Who translated Bible to Greek the first,

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
The first Greek translation of the Bible was the Septuagint of the 3rd-2nd centuries BC. The Pentateuch was translated in the 3rd century BC and most of the rest of the Hebrew Bible in the 2nd century BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Peled has described his book, The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine (2012),[2] as an account of how he, “the son of an Israeli General and a staunch Zionist, came to realize that “the story upon which I was raised … was a lie.”[3]

Kevin
5 hours ago

@withey
You’re retarded. Are Koreans like 60% Italian, 15% German?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
paul?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it boils down to do they pass, which means both aesthetics and mindset

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Wrong war(s) Fatigue.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Same like Paul.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
he’s still trapped in that ‘Germans bad’ box

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
According to Peled: “Israel has been on a mission to destroy the Palestinian people for over six decades. Why would anyone not give solidarity to the Palestinian people?”[16 Peled has written that the “IDF lusts for blood, accused Israeli officials of “ethnic cleansing.”[18]

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
White People War Fatigue.

withey
5 hours ago

@Philip.Kollberg
don’t give brother nathaniel any attention he’s a jew who’s larping as a christian nothing more

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miko_Peled#Views

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
and the most pro-Nature

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
But, unironically, I would award Michael Douglas and Harrison Ford with the ‘white’ title.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Contrary to popular Lies. Nationalist White people are the most Anti•War, Peace Path people on the planet.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
i dont know this person, sadly?

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white. according to jews
https://forward.com/community/405016/no-ashkenazi-jews-are-not-functionally-white/

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Miko Peled sounds based, for someone who grew in zionist family.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
koreans are not white, light shade of coloured skin is just that

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Some Jews actually see themselves as white. Caucasian white. Most find it just a secondary or even tertiary thing.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
they aren’t. They descended from about 350 people in the Middle East.

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Brother Nathaniel

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Bring some Jew to the show (that is anti-Ron Unz).

Kevin
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
So what? They are white. Ironically saying that pissed more Jews off than anyone else because most of them deny their majority European ancestry

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Elon is proving to be very useful for white cause. Even though, he is not one of us.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
W

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
if you’re in the US, join Patriot Front

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Sweden democrats apeasing Israel.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And slaves, and native Americans and whites of different stocks. All fighting against other whites in the name of…being free of the taxes.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Empathy for the Devil aka SatanicJeews.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Elon also said that Jews are peak white…

Kevin
5 hours ago
Elon also is giving Lowe support. He posted a picture of his parents and grandparents in Britain and said “We can’t let our homeland fall”

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
stupid argument. White is still white. If you’re talking about the slaves, I agree that it was the worst mistake the US ever made.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Alek Yerbury compared Rupert Lowe’s policies to Margaret Thatcher’s.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
They should have joined PA

jm
5 hours ago
so, would it be better if >Rupert Lowe went the way of activism but not parlementarisme ?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
America is diluted anyways. Since its inception.

Kevin
5 hours ago
It is within First Past the Post systems and in the British system specifically

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I don’t think a Reform gov with Farage as MP will be as damaging as a Labour gov.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I am afraid that some unpopular leaders may be necessary, but Reagan was very based on JQ. But I guess it proves that you don’t have to be pro-semitic to be based and vice-versa.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Any president who dilutes the essence of what an American used to be (a white person of moral character) is shite. So pretty much every president

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Legal migration to USA is hard af fuk

withey
5 hours ago
i back the strongest message

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
“Anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American.” — President Ronald Reagan (January 19, 1989)

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Reagan*

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Illegals, criminals and immigrants who want to go home if paid are easy wins. We can all agree with that.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)
Reagan was a plant who allowed 3 million illegal migrants to stay in the US. To hell with him

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
And he turned against them.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
i agree rupert feels better than farage as primeminister

Kevin
5 hours ago
Farage is surrounded by very questionable people: conservatives who brought the migrations, muslims, etc.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
Reagan was handpicked by them

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
At least Reagan was anti-Jewish during his tenure.

Kevin
5 hours ago
I actually think people don’t like Farage as much as you think. They are just the only other option. Farrage comes across as a clown, not a prime minister. Lowe looks like a prime minister – that is imporant

withey
5 hours ago

@Hillbrow
we must sink him, hopefully racism will see him flee

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
It is imperative that the BBC are dismantled and exported to West Africa.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
like Reagan did the American people, thatcher did massive damage to the British people

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I think both can be useful as long as they don’t work against each other.

withey
5 hours ago
rupert will work hard, we must sink farage,

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
We use to call it ‘fake opposition’.

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
where does anyone named habib fit in?

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
it seems to be an absolute truth that people will carry hope until they are starving

withey
5 hours ago
very true the fake ukip stole ukip votes because people didn’t check the wording

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
problem is 19 from that are working for the jewish controlled government.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It produced however the greater unity and awareness of some crucial ideas which probably wouldn’t happen if he wasn’t elected. Whatever you think, having a central political figure is the only way to go.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
I thought being locked down and forced to be jabbed would wake up most people-sadly not

Kevin
5 hours ago
Then having a big nationalist party will just transition to a resistance movement with high profile leaders

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
80/20 rule. 80% are cattle, 20% know what’s going on. half of those people are in power and the other half is us lol

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
No. We’re separating. Geogralicalky and socially

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
At least you will always have your mandela statue in trafalgar square

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
*that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I’m quite frankly astonished the most people are still normies. They listened to lies on TV and when they go out and see the opposite they still believe the TV.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
We are pulling apart

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
there’s quite a bit here in the States.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
I blame the cocksucking males.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Actualky there’s very little inter breeding

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people united around Trump. They believed in him. That has turned out great hasn’t it?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
idiots cause trouble and leave

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It won’t help also to spread blackpills and demoralization. People need a figure they could unite around.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I noticed that myself with some white nationalist groups. People infight then always someone leaves it.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people only need hope in themselves. That’s easy if you know yourself and your strengths and utilize them. Those who need to cope with lies won’t accomplish anything meaninful

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
People need hope. If people became self-deprecated and hopeless about the political solution, that only leads to more misery and hell.

Kevin
5 hours ago
This example is bunk. The real comparison is if the White Army tried to unite with the Mensheviks

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
If they look english i trust them lol. even if theyre wrong on some things

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
my new working theory

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Are you talking Mark about Wyvern the Terrible?

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The brst way to know who to truat : Physiognomy.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
If Lowe succeeds, hope is kindled. If he doesn’t, more people will become disaffected and believe there is no political solution. I think it’s a win-win

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
I hope so

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
59 B.C. Cicero criticized the Jews of Rome for their perceived political power and presence in public assemblies. He famously noted their solidarity, suggesting they “stick together” and could exert significant influence over court proceedings through their numbers and organized presence.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Cultural Standardisation causes alienation

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Also, Edward II expelled Jews in the 12th century from UK.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@AlexandreL
this is a classic argument by supporters of the Constitution and the Bible. It really doesn’t matter what these documents used to mean, it matters what role they play in society now.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I don’t see blacks voting in the constitution it was something that is a modern perception after lincoln and the civil rights era.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
And you xan guess who

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Marxism and Globalism two side of the same Hamner. It’s ethnicalky driven.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it goes back a long time to the Time of Rome even. In 1492 Spain expelled the jews and in 1493 the Spanish golden age started.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing “The Enemy of Europe” by Francis Yakey later tonigbt in their livestream

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Danny Tomo hates Mark.

withey
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
certainly

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
I predict that Farage will end up being disgraced for all of his cucking.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Well you can say that about a lot if you go like this is what we used to be but now we’re in the 21st century this is what it means now yo.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
yes so the mischief of jews spans back to 2000 years.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
dirty tricks already underway:
https://xcancel.com/InevitableWes

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I hope that Lowe won’t be outed from politics for antisemitism like Jeremy Corbyn was.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I think a lot of ordinary folk will get confused between Reform and Restore and which is Farage and which is Lowe

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The same looking High Street in all 4 corners of the globe

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@AlexandreL
in order for the Constitution to still have the glory it once did, the nation needs to have the people who respected what it represented while contributing to society. In other words, White primacy.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
The movement needs trailblazers for those who come after have a path to follow.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Most perverts like voting for Queers.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Napoleon also had some anti-Jew legislatures but I forgot which.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@withey
yes. also danny has a lot of confidence in his sprinting attributes

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
The constitution didn’t start being known the way it is until the 1960s or at least Lincoln when he said blacks should have the right to vote and all the rights white people do.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, now we are going too deep in history. I wouldn’t say that Jews actually were a ‘thing’ more than 100 years. Somehow Jews got the most of these wars that European fought among themselves in the past 200 years. But gradually, not immediately.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing thus book later tonigbt in their livestream

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
read; The Enemy of Ejrope by Francis Yokey

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
very true i’m not a member but i support it

withey
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
good because it furthers the divide

Kevin
5 hours ago
Members don’t = votes. Our message is popular and we know it

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
i agred

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
Christianity has a role in breaking down whites’ loss of racial preference. Sorry Christians, but your universal ideology has corrupted our people.

2
1
Hide replies

@Glen19
2 hours ago
Universal religions like Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity has pushed Paganism to extinction around most of the planet. Identity isn’t solely based on religion otherwise it wouldn’t exist. Blaming Christianity for the Woes of is just deflection.

1
0
Prison Ships
2 minutes ago
TheHolyChristianBible rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more so than anything else, does and there is Nothing anyone can do about it. It Stands Written.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
not all wars were started by jews indeed. But most wars were financed by jews going back to Napoleon since the Rothschild family captured most of Europe’s banks.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
the middle class would rather lord it over ethnics. i suspect theyll revret it

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
danny tommo is promising to give anyone a hiding that abuses his monkey mates on twitter lol

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
I think relation to the Jewishness is pretty fluid. Especially if your ancestor was native European, but who converted to judaism in meantime.

withey
6 hours ago
sargon will go full force, tommy is a civ nat

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
all other groups have ethnic self consciousness.

jm
6 hours ago
reimigration, and than, all those mixed race families, more and more every year, time is running out

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not sure that swastika ban is common anywhere. In countries like Germany yes, or like mine, but not every country is like that. Some have bigger freedom of speech. Austria had 20 years openly nazi chancellor.

withey
6 hours ago

@konstrukt
agreed and it ties in with the social contagion

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Suicidal BabyKilling women.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh… Need I not remind that we fought over it 80 years ago? We, as Europeans, not Jews. Those sentiments still prevailed ’til this day. Especially when you had people allying with the Nazis to kill their neighbors.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
And cultural standard-isation is the cause

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
The Constitution needs to go.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Suicidal (((Marxism)))

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@KevinClan
well yes, that was intentional by the Founding Fathers to prevent a tyranny. However, our country is now invaded every year and our federal government doesn’t have the power to properly address the issue.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
cultural alienation is the disease

Kevin
6 hours ago
truth is, British government has way more power than the US federal government. They can cut all benefits, while the US government cant

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Yes it proves he was two generations ago related to a jew not that he was one.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
He didn’t know he had Jewish ancestry I just said that.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, Lenin was 1/6 or 1/8 Jewish.

jm
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
well, yes boomers have a lot to go for them, we grew up in very much harder society

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago(edited)

@noreplacement

@jm
as much disdain as I have for the many silent gens and boomers who allowed all of this mania to take place, I agree that whites have to work together. However, there is no better way for people to disassociate from their programming than some form of trauma like a Black Swan event.

withey
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
agreed

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
A certain amount of Cuck makes a Traitor.

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
agreed

Kevin
6 hours ago
Rupert already has addressed this with his “fast track spouse” visa promise. He is reaching out to the Thai bride people, but saying it will be banned from Pakistan, Afghanistan and other problem countries.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It also speaks against white people how so many of them side with jews and the left in Britain and France today. The jews wouldnt be able to do this without whites stupidity. Means white people are just as bad.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
The older generation is more important than ever because only they know what was normal 20 years ago.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
No, it’s Nazbol. Not exactly the nazi type of fascism.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
here’s the key difference, the demographic reality when the bnp was popular was not as dire as it is now. so, cucking like Farage does when your people are on the brink of becoming a despised minority is no longer a winning strategy.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the intelligence of the joke is what defines it

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
you will get jailed in every single European country if you publicly display a swastika. National Socialism is not a threat to Europeans it’s only a threat to world jewry and the jewish banking mafia.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
I’m a boomer too and see a lot of younger folk, sadly waiting for boomers to die off is not going to fix things. All generations have to work together

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@withey
you can be funny without telling dark or political jokes. It only degrades your rhetoric and makes you look crass and unprofessional

withey
6 hours ago
make it trend to make it acceptable

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
And to add, so far I haven’t seen much of Jew protection from the Soviets. Even in post-Stalin times. Now, all Jews who don’t want to end murdered or imprisoned and who are rich, have to cuck to Putin.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
probably to make sure everyone was serious, we however need humour to soften the blow

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It’s said Lenin never actually knew he had 1 8th jewish ancestry.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
To be frank, the only reason why today Nazi symbols and values are strongly condemned in Russia is because they won in ww2, with individually probably the biggest death rate. So, I believe that antisemitism thing is just thrown in the basket along with anti-Nazism.

jm
6 hours ago

@withey
I am a boomer, and I can tell you, they exaspared me, they have to go before younger people can get a grip on that holocaust question and throw it off and be for our own people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Yes that is true but it means lenins grandfather was half jewish I heard he was 8th jewish. Not Lenin and I heard Lenin hadn’t even known about it.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Hitler didn’t like dark or political jokes. I think that’s an important lesson to learn as a public figure

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
They own tbe media. Thetefore they control the public’s minds

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
The revelation was intended to combat rising anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, though the information was suppressed.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago
Communist language has become the spirit of the times, which is why everyone who thinks differently is now considered a Nazi.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Yeh. Electoral politics aint the way

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
it’s not difficult we just need to make it trend to make it acceptable

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, but they have to revisted their history -they have to throw off the holocaust lies, behore they can proceed

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Sorry my mistake. It’s not a rumor. Documents released by a Moscow museum in 2011 confirmed that Vladimir Lenin had Jewish ancestry, supporting a long-standing, formerly suppressed rumor
. Lenin’s maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to escape persecut

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, not really. He indeed had apparently Jewish ancestry, but I wouldn’t say it was half. Great-grandfather was, from I forgot which side. Which funny enough, he didn’t even know about during his lifetime.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
facism was and has been the answer to communism for a long time. That is the Third Position and is inevitable.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The NAZI question isn’t even really about Jews, its that the general public still views
it as extreme and evil and don’t want to be associated with it. It isn’t a hill to die on, and you can definately expect Lowe to say he is not a nazi and doesn’t support nazis

withey
6 hours ago
that was then this is now, people are sick of immigrants

jm
6 hours ago
the nazi question is very much difficult… it clips our wings, and I am you can say a nazi what my opinions are -the third way

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
MSM and MPs call everyone “Nazis”. Even Boris and the Tories were called “Nazis”.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Its like America today is heavily jewish influenced but it still is on the white americans to fight for this and be complicit in it for so long.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Germany is entirely occupied, there is no need to rehash WW2 right now. There’s no political way to win regarding Hitler

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
hopefully lowe sees what farage did and do the opposite

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Local Councils in England have got all those foreign born illwgal Uber drivers on Lease contracts with nothing to pay up front

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Libertanism existed long before communism is created. It dates back to Reformation period, or even before maybe. Third Position to me sounds like a Nazbol, to be honest.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
who said Nazi? Gott mit uns

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
jews fight for power as well like everyone else. In the end the biggest achievement of the Soviet Union was defeating the most antisemitic government in the 20th century. And thus it seemed the only purpose of the Soviets was to protect jews in Europe.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The whole nazi thing has to be avoided – denounce it in public. We need to save the damn country, not fight WW2

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
everyone is affected by immigration most aren’t affected by rape gangs

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
so the moral of the lesson is to cuck?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the fun stuff

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the only word for lowe to have is ‘remigration’

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
yes it should be something about immigration… now on the interview with Maitlis it was around the grooming gangs -there is another point that can reassamble a lot of people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
That was bullshit and has been refuted.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I would say that indeed yes, Stalin purged many Jews from power, but it didn’t start with him. Don’t forget about mensheviks and their conflict with bolsheviks and bolsheviks killed them all. And both were all Jews.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Tony Lacomba?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
don’t know how people feel about it

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I think the “send them back” is pretty good but I don’

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Lenin is rumored to be half jewish himself. It is ironic that a jewish woman tried to assassinate him.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Mostly blacks drank Jim’s Kool Aid.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because they would be persecuted if they don’t so.

jm
6 hours ago
May be Lowe should point to one programme point, one slogan where people can get behind

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
is libertarianism*

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Initially, bolshevik party was overwhelmingly Jewish. Lenin got USSR out of ww1. Then, I guess non-Jews got used to it. Lenin was dictator and so was Stalin but the irony is that this figures have the most positive impression on the Russian people.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
so the answer to communism and libertarianism? Jews created both sides of the spectrum and people feel they need to pick a side when there’s a “Third Position” o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
In the beginning jews loved the communist government because it served them. When Stalin started to purge all the jews from power than they hated it and hate it till this day.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
And the army also had to have millions of Russians willing to fight for communism and they did to do the revolution in the first place.

@Goblinz_and_Ghouls
6 hours ago
Ayn Rand loved amphetamine and cigarettes more than life itself. She once said the glow of a cigarette is like the fire in a mans heart.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@BritishGammon
yep, play the (vague) game

@SaulGoodman
6 hours ago
Rupert Lowe is part of the problem. he is a tory banker that wants legal migrants to replace white Brits who are forced to pick litter for subsistence wages.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Farage is cucking to the Somalians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not so sure about that. Take Ayn Rand for e.x. One of the reasons why we speak badly today about communism and bolsheviks are because of her and her early life experience. Plenty of Jews croaked in these pogroms. I wouldn’t say they benefit from it, if they were not part of govt

Kevin
6 hours ago
I wouldn’t sit with Laws or Zoomer either lol

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Lowe just has to say “the party is a broad church”. That’s what all other parties say

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Well I’m trying to say the assemblies in power were full of Russian politicians who weren’t jewish who allowed them to stay in powerful positions too!

withey
6 hours ago

@horatiohornblower
sargon passes as white, so of course he stays

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
this

jm
6 hours ago
Bravo Marc

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Today, Marxism dominates the entire West. That was the result.

WhiteLightWhiteHeat
6 hours ago
“Independently wealthy” is KEY!

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
They were powerless to do anything. But maybe they bought into its ideology. Just like French revolutionaires did in 1789.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
antisemitism was punishable by death in the early Soviet era. Maybe they killed som troublesome jews who refused to go along the program, but the majority of jews hugely benefited the bolshevik revolution.

@horatiohornblower
6 hours ago
Sargon is black, will he be deported?

withey
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
no, instead be overenthusiastic, inspire hope and good feeling

Kevin
6 hours ago
Brexit party founder has now come out for Lowe also

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
agreed

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
Rupert will have to be single minded and strong

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Churchill called the October revolution Jewish. He even led an attempt to overthrow the bolshevik government, but… Who knows where would we be today if he succeeded.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
The Tsar and family were murdered during the shortest nights of the year.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Every party has factions-they know they have to work together

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Still at the end of the day, Russia chose communism. The jews couldnt have run it without russians allowing them to.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
I respect your persistence but I would suggest not engaging that troll. He’s actively trying to sow discord in this stream

withey
6 hours ago
idling makes for social problems, work makes for cooperation

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Idk, it is possible they didn’t. There weren’t as much as Jews as white Christians anyway. I think a lot more Jews actually emigrated to the West, after bolsheviks seized power, but also so during the tsarist times. Which makes me think, what values exactly bolsheviks brought for Jew

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
measured enthusiasm

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
Sargons like pacman gobblin up coins in the wake of people with balls

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Read Churchill’s newspaper article from February 8, 1920, in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, in which he described the decisive role of the Jews

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
not at all

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Many of the other soviet assembly members were Russians who weren’t jewish. Also Stalin the infamous one responsible for all the stuff he was wasn’t Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
time to normalise toxicity

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Sargon is a fraud

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
On the night of 16/17 July 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police (Cheka) led by Yurovsky executed Russia’s last emperor, Nicholas II, along with his family. – The Yurovsky family was Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
have hope, get motivation, push them, force the hand

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
We still need activism and collectivism to achieve true power

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Agreed Mark! We can’t overdose on the white pills. Plenty of work to do

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Well it’s still simplified as jewish when it was a european country russia choosing on a national scale communism and they still choose it it’s still pretty popular today in Russia.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
infatuation stage

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@withey
howdy!

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@MilosM.

@utopia148800

@BritishGammon

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
If Lowe is successful the overton window is much easier to shift in other countries, and hopefully the US. I think it’s reasonable to plan in case it doesn’t work out. 1488

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
we dont have any other avenue than Lowe even if theres a slowmotion boot to the face coming

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
but they didn’t kill 20 million jews because they did kill 20 million white Christians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening and evening to

@withey

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@0KT0BER

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i love farmers

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
o/

@withey

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Evening

withey
6 hours ago
good evening all 14/88 wpwp 28

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Bolshevik Jews killed other Jews.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
^

jm
6 hours ago
Make the stream about what Marc is talking about… not about jews in the politburo

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe is a pretty big white pill I will admit

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the lifting of self-censorship is the beginning of enlightenment for the masses

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
he’s a kayak clearly

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, I think he has not read anything

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s been doing this for sometime, have a look on his odysee page

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I can’t tell if

@AlexandreL
is a troll or legitimately believes these things. A waste trying to convince someone like this however

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Including stalin and lenin and every leader they had.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
There were plenty of soviet officials who weren’t jewish.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Also which one of the soviet leaders you can name was a jew? None of them. As well as many of the soviet parliaments or assemblies or whatever you call them.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
what on earth are you talking about? the 60,000,000 people slain by the Communist regime were Christian Europeans, White Russians, Muslims, etc. sure, some of the whites joined with the Communists but obviously some members of a group will always be traitors/scum and sell out.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Trotsky wasn’t even having a good time in the bolsheviks I heard he got in prison for something.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because the Europeans were superior. What do you think the backward Muslims or Africans would have done if they had possessed technological superiority?

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
If I remember correctly, three of the seven members of the first Politburo were Jewish, 43%, in a population share of 5%. The Cheka was predominantly Jewish.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
who were the kulaks

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
probably true. But we need some positives and what else do we have right now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The soviets killed a lot of people but nowhere near 60 million. It may have been Jewish influenced but they were far from the only ones in powerful positions who wanted it.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
Are we all forgetting that we’re not voting our way out of this? Golden Dawn was the third most popular party in the Greek parliament and held as many as 21 seats. Due to jewish supremacist lobbying the party was declared a criminal organization and its leaders were sentenced to 13.5 years in prison.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
What’s a kayak? Oh… I see it now.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Putin said ~86% of leaders NKVD secret police were SatanicJeews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The rumors of stalin being a jew were false! Also the soviet union didnt kill 60 million people that is a hugely exagerated numbre and also the ones killing them were Russians just like the victims were.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago
he is

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
well said

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
ANd had millions of slavic europeans willing to fight for their cause and also only a percentage of the actual soviet powerful were jews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And hundreds of millions of european russians and eastern europeans from other regions.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the Bolsheviks were Jews not Europeans. the rise in Communism by Stalin and Trotsky (real last name. Bronstein) is entirely relevant to the JQ and mass immigration today

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
When it’s Russia there’s no issue saying how horrible Europeans are.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Only Idiots think the World War’s results aren’t the reason Satan is Amplified.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
But why it has nothing to do with us there’s not reason we should feel guilty if it happened. The Soviet Union was Russians and people are fully willing to talk about Europeans committing the worst genocides in history supposedly.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
he seems like a genuine bloke

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, politics is a game and we do not make the rules-yet.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Godspeed Sir!

the woodlander
6 hours ago
jumping to rumble

jm
6 hours ago
Lowe has the ring of honesty about him

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the people who still believe the 6m narrative are cattle. They will eventually either mix into obscurity or become a powerless majority

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Until September 1, 1939, Hitler had murdered a few hundred people, while Stalin had already killed millions. And of course, Stalin didn’t receive a declaration of war although he seized the greater part of Poland.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Depends on what they accuse you of

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i don’t put much stock in mens words anymore

Better Based Than Erased
6 hours ago
Scaredy cats aren’t they – not speaking about kosher

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
And Germany 80 years ago has nothing to do with us.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
I hope they will ban imports as well

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Thow the NeoBolshevik Oppressors out of the ‘overtonwindow’.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
Openly supporting the mustache man gives the media ammo as well. So you have to make due with something.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
so it’s 1950 again? eventually that still led to where we are now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
So the solution is to become supporters of the thing they accuse you of? Also me okay because I am one of you as hard as it is to believe.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
seems he’s ok with nons as long as they are productive and not a public drain

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe needs to give the right answer to the Holohoax…

jm
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
that is just to suppose the worst…

@who
6 hours ago

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
who is a charlie chaplin impersonator?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I just fear the Lowe’s reponse to the JQ and nons that are born within the UK – equivalent to “birthright citizenship” here in the States.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
If we do not expose the 6m myth we will always held back. As soon as we get going, they bring up the holo

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MarkCollett
What I would like to ask is what are your plans if Lowe gets in to power but totally betrays the cause like all the other nationalist parties that were elected to lead?

jm
6 hours ago
it is true, in 2014 I still supported Israel ! can you imagine ? Now I follow Marc, RedIce, Blackpilled, Warstrike and many more.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Which is kind of the definition of a Nazi supporter isn’t it?

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
People in this chat were just telling me they don’t want to be called nazis by the media but then tell me about how the Nazis were nice and six million cookies weren’t baked.

the woodlander
6 hours ago
all of those tweets come from his team, not rupert himself. i just hope he understands.

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@WarStrike

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I’m not a non.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
A whole bunch but I usually don’t watch live. Nick Fuentes, Jake Shields Redice Blood Tribe and a bunch of smaller shows.

jm
6 hours ago
I saw the interview with Maitlis -he was good

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
yep proceed with caution is best

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I’ve heard of that, I’ll check it out. thanks

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Common Sense Revival Ahead..

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The Soviet Union was a European state too buddy. I’m not a J I shouldn’t get this much people telling me to bore off for not supporting a charlie chaplin impersonator.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
extraordinary

Kevin
6 hours ago
80k now Mark

Chief Moody
6 hours ago
I thought it was 80K

Kevin
6 hours ago
it’s 80 thousand now

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
What role do the dead Jews play in the context of 60 million deaths and the downfall of Europe, simply because the British and French declared war over German territories? Tell me.

JamesL
6 hours ago
bore off

@AlexandreL

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
you can’t be mad at Cookie Monster for being skeptical :flatbread:

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897 that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Warstrike is interesting

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
We can never trust politicians. I trust Mark.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
which streams do you mean? I don’t watch many people aside from Collett and Devon Stack.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
You’re lucky streams in America start at 2am for us here

Kevin
6 hours ago
your buddy Mike from TRS was just shitting all over Lowe saying nobody should do anything because it is all over. like to hell with that guy

Prison Ships
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
You can’t do anything about it, so stop moaning..Your opinion is over amplified for 88 years.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
71 watching, 18 likes. Hit that fire button!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
though it’s afternoon for me lol

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Hello Sir!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
*gentlemen

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Evening Gentleman.

Secure the future of our people
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Just finished watching your Jake Shields interview. It was pretty awesome! :ok_hand:

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
spot on.

the woodlander
7 hours ago

@0KT0BER
buddy

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
evening Woody

Prison Ships
7 hours ago
Favouring SatanicJeews over Christian Germany was offensively Foul.

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
if you are white, you have some serious learning to do. But I suspect you’re a non

the woodlander
7 hours ago
gentlemen

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark why do you not think any mention of the Nazis tarnishes your entire movement in the eyes of normies?

JamesL
7 hours ago

Mark Collett
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
you are making all my points!

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
sadly this is not helped by some in the movement- I will argue against the BOOMER MYTH of Churchill saving Britain BUT trying to recreate nazi germany is as daft as trying to bring back the witchfinder general-

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
PART of what has held nationalism back IS this association by media of ANY Nationalist movement with muh evil nazis-WHY do you think it was the 1st question asked to Nick on QT. WHY do you think the media kept putting out those cartoonish photos of John Tyndall playing nazi dress up?

@AlexandreL
8 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
Who says that everyone here believes stuff about 1939? You’re kind of speaking for everyone it has no relevance to the modern day and issues in our lives.

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
Its the best out there- yes he’s a civ nat Boomer, Yes he probably wouldn’t agree with us that Britain should have stayed neutral in 1939-BUT he is putting forward BNP type policies & ALREADY has 50.000 members whereas the BNP Peak was 14000 & the NF peak was 16000.This surely is a white pill…

@AlexandreL
12 hours ago

@MarkCollett
:kissing_closed_eyes:

Mark Collett
15 hours ago

@AlexandreL
The Room!

@AlexandreL
17 hours ago
Hello Mark, I did not hit her, oh hi Mark.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897

@AlexandreL
that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
I’m just saying you can’t say its not true when Mark lets people donate him 14 dollars and 88 cents every stream. He’s asking to be associated with certain people.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
1939, Mustache man declares war on Poland.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
fcck off you little worm

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
https://odysee.com/@0KT0BER:9/opencourt-doc-1897:f

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
Friday, March 24, 1933 – Judea Declares War On Germany

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
When most channels would ban them instantly I’m not saying you should I’m just saying what it looks like.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
channel.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
You shouldn’t be saying anything like Churchill was the real villain or Auschwitz wasnt killing people or any stupid shit like that that guy is associating himself with the nazis by humanizing them in any way. I suspect you are more or less a nazi supporter thats why you let these people on your

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript