Host: Good evening, everyone. Tonight I am jumping on stream to have a chat about the election with everyone’s favourite, Joel Davis. Welcome, Joel.

 

Joel Davis: Good to be on.

 

Host: We wanted to have a chat about the upcoming election because there’s a lot of discourse that you guys have got heavy on your chest that you want to let out, and I think it’s a good time to do it. We’re on the final leg of the election campaign and you guys stirred up quite a bit of controversy on Anzac Day, so I thought we’d talk about that first.

 

One question that I haven’t seen answered, at least on my feed is the things surrounding the planning of it. I want to know, like, was that planned going to the Anzac Day memorial and choreographing that booing. I don’t know what time it was, but I think it was like, maybe five, six o’clock in the morning. Like, what was. What was the plan around that? Give us some bit of insight to that morning.

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, we planned to do it a long time ago.

 

I can’t remember whose idea it was originally. It might have been. It might have been Sewell’s.

 

But, yeah, the plan was for a while, like, next Anzac Day, if they do another Welcome to Country, which they probably will, let’s do it! And we don’t usually. Like, we didn’t. We weren’t in a big group. We were in some of us aren’t even allowed to associate, so I wasn’t with the boys. Everyone was in little groups and the idea was just, basically just be somewhere in your little. With a few of your mates or with your family members or whatever, whoever you’re going to the Dawn Service with, and if they do a Welcome to Country, or a land acknowledgment or whatever, boo!

 

And obviously her got down there nice and early in the mornings. It was right up the front. And so he was able to be so loud that you could actually hear him through the microphone on the television and broadcast it out or project it out to the larger crowd.

 

So, yeah, we weren’t expecting them to then make it about us. We thought that the impression would just be that the crowd did it and that it would just be like this kind of spontaneous thing. We didn’t necessarily want the credit, but they managed to pin it on us pretty quickly. They have a bunch of police, like, on the shrine with cameras and everything pointed at the crowd, because I’ve been there before for Anzac Day, for Remembrance Day, and there’s a bunch of cops on the shrine with advanced cameras and they’re just like pointing them straight at us and like staring at us the whole time. And we don’t usually do anything. We just stand there and we just attend the service that we leave.

 

We would never come to Anzac Day in uniform and with banners and microphones and megaphones and do any of that kind of thing on Anzac Day because we don’t think it’s appropriate. But what we also don’t think is appropriate is the fucking Welcome to Country! The Welcome to Country, what it fundamentally is a declaration of Aboriginal sovereignty.

 

And obviously we don’t believe in that. We believe in Australian sovereignty and that sovereignty was bled for by the Anzacs in the First World War and it was bled for by other veterans of the Australian military in the Second World War and other wars. So it’s ridiculously inappropriate and obviously the people agree with us, which is why it’s had such a engaging reaction from the public.

 

Host: I have a question on that specific thing. I said this on stream the other day in the fallout. This was my personal opinion. I said that it had to be someone as polarizing as Jacob to do this because the discourse wouldn’t have existed if it was just a random person on any other given day.

 

What are your thoughts on that? Because I think it’s incredible that this has happened and it’s become such a pivotal talking point where the debate last night these guys were asked about it. You know, it’s got a lifespan of over four or five days or four days now. Three, four days. And they constantly talking about it. It was brought up on Sky News every hour all day today, despite the fact that it’s been a few days now. But what are your thoughts on the fact that it. I feel like it had to be someone polarizing to be able to get the discourse and get the ball rolling on the discussion with the broader society.

 

What are your thoughts on that?

 

Joel Davis: I think, yes, I think maybe because this issue is so potent, because it really strikes at the core of like our identity as a nation, like the question what defines us? Is it Aboriginal sovereignty? Is it the so-called first nations culture? Which is utterly contrived by the way, like the Welcome to Country is a modern invention. The dot paintings was literally invented by a White guy and taught to the Aboriginals. Like they don’t actually have much continuity with whatever their culture was before we showed up.

 

There’s been this construction in recent decades of this so-called Aboriginal culture by Marxist academics and so on. And this is part of it.

 

And then they gaslight everyone into it being like some continuous thing. When anyone who’s older than, like, 20 remembers that there wasn’t Welcome to Country at everything when we were growing up. Like, this is a pretty new thing that all of a sudden there’s Welcome to Country at everything. And the media has tried to gaslight everyone as if we’ve always been doing this and this is an ancient tradition and all this bullshit, but everyone knows it’s bullshit, really.

 

But, yeah, I think because of that. And then also the Anzacs. I mean, Australia Day is a big deal because Australia Day is about celebrating British settlement. And obviously we were all over the news on Australia Day as well, and that’s important.

 

[07:31]

 

But the thing is, on Australia Day, what most people are doing is they’re having a barbecue, maybe they go to the beach, have a few beers, and it’s more of a chill, celebrate with your mates and your family kind of day. But Anzac Day isn’t quite like that. Anzac Day, you know, is. It’s more serious because it’s about remembering people who paid the ultimate sacrifice at wartime for our country. So you get up early in the morning, you go to the Dawn Service and you. It’s more. It’s almost like a religious. I’m not going to say almost. It is a religious day for Australians because you are venerating your ancestors. This is an ancient. An ancient tradition of pretty much every civilisation ever to venerate their ancestors. It’s a form of ancestor worship. We’re literally doing prayers to our fallen ancestors.

 

So Anzac Day is a very big deal. It’s the most emotional day for a patriotic Australian in the calendar, as far as your nationalism goes. And people have very strong feelings about it for obvious reasons.

 

And the thing is that back in World War I, 40% of the military kind of like fighting age men in Australia signed up to go and fight in World War I. 40%. It was like over 400,000 men of only about a million fighting age men in the country at that time. And there was no conscription, so that was voluntary. Australia had the highest participation rate of any of the Allied countries in World War I, other than Serbia, who started the war, and all Serbians had to fight.

 

So a lot of Australians served in World War I with the Anzacs, and a lot of Australians served in World War II.

 

And so if you’re an Australian who traces your heritage back to that time, you’re pretty likely to have ancestors that served in one of those two conflicts, particularly in World War I, because the participation rate was so high.

 

So it’s something that’s in our blood as Australians. And you know, people say:

 

“Oh, World War I, it was like a war for it was a war for the British Empire. They were in Gallipoli, they were in France. What does Turkey and France have to do with Australia?”

 

Well, it was a war for Australia because Australia was part of the British Empire and our primary concern was the rising Japanese Empire in the early 20th century. And you can go and read, if you read your history and you read the statements by our prime ministers and our leading politicians at the time, diplomatic conferences, at the Imperial conference with the British and so on, we were constantly bringing up the issue of the Japanese. And the Japanese had defeated the Russians in a war in the 1900s, mid-1900s, just after Australia was federated. And that was a big deal. That was the first time a non-White power had defeated a White power in the modern world. So people were like:

 

“Wow, the Japanese are serious. They could beat the Russians in a war. These are serious mother fuckers!”

 

A few years later, they annexed Korea, they just take Korea and they show that they had an expansionist intent. In the lead up to the First World War, there was a great anxiety in Australia of:

 

“Well, what happens if the British Empire isn’t there to protect us?”

 

So we had to make sure that the British won World War I against the Germans and the other powers allied with the Germans, because if they didn’t and the British Empire collapsed, we were going to be a sitting duck, we thought, potentially for an expansionist Japanese Empire.

 

So that was why Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister during World War I, when he addressed the people, to convince them to sign up to fight in the First World War, to become ANZACs, 65,000 of which died and another almost 150,000 of which were wounded. He had to convince the people to go and fight in France and ultimately in Turkey. And what he said was:

 

“I bid thee go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

That’s what he said to the people. It was the idea that if we weren’t going to be able to have a wide Australia policy anymore, if the British Empire collapses and the Japanese, you know, invade us and subjugate us.

 

So that was paid for in blood.

 

Obviously the British Empire was one of the victorious powers in the First World War. And the same logic went into the Second World War. When we went to the Second World War, it was the same logic. Australians didn’t go and fight in North Africa and in Southern Europe against the Germans because they were morally repulsed by National Socialism or they were concerned about anti-semitism or [chuckling] anything like that they were simply trying to defend the British Empire because they were concerned about an expansionist Japanese empire which at this point had taken half of China and was really showing that it had a will to dominate the entire region that we were in. Because Japan invaded China in 1933, six years before World War II broke out in Europe.

 

So that’s why we went to war.

 

[12:24]

 

And then as soon as the war with Japan started in 1941 or 1940, then immediately our prime minister said:

 

“We’ve got to bring the boys back!”

 

And he pulled all of our boys out of North Africa, out of fighting the Germans and the Italians and brought them back here to fight the Germans. And the British abandoned us. The British Empire collapsed. They failed in Singapore, they pulled out, they lost Hong Kong, they lost a lot of their territories that they controlled in Asia. The British Navy retreated. They were all focused all their energy on fighting the Germans.

 

And so we pulled our boys out of Europe and said:

 

“Okay, well we’re going to fight, we’re going to fight for Australia here.”

 

And we completely abandoned the war in Europe for the rest of the war to fight here against Japan or in our region and with the Americans who came in on our side.

 

So World War II was about fighting the Japanese Empire and really World War I was about defending ourselves against the Japanese Empire. Both of these wars, the way that was perceived by our politicians and by the public, by the media, by everyone in Australian society was about protecting White Australia in the face of an expanding yellow empire. And even you could say the wars in Korea and in Vietnam that were then for in the 50s and the 60s, obviously that was in the Cold War paradigm against communism.

 

But it was a similar concern of like, if communism rips through Asia, eventually they’re going to have their designs on Australia.

 

And so what motivated Australians to go and fight in Korea and in Vietnam was a very similar motivation. Even though the concern wasn’t the Japanese this time, it was instead the communist powers of Asia expanding. And that’s the threat that faces us today. When we think about what would World War Three be, would probably be an American led alliance against China and that we’d be involved in that as well. And that’s what’s being prepared for basically right now by our political class.

 

So that’s the geopolitical context that in which we fought.

 

And the reason why we were going and fighting in places like Iraq and Afghanistan was because America is our partner from a geopolitical standpoint against an ascendant China. And we wanted to maintain the favour of the Americans now that the British Empire has collapsed after the Second World War. So all of Australia’s foreign policy can be understood in those terms and their sacrifices can be understood in those terms. And we can have our criticisms. The British Empire, it was taken over by jewish bankers and commercial interests and it had many flaws. And the American Empire definitely is taken over by jewish bankers and commercial interests and has exceptional flaws and is also responsible for using its soft power in our country to subvert our political system and bring us into this neo-liberal shitscape that we now live in. But that’s nevertheless the case. That was, that was what the logic was behind a lot of these wars and why these men were fighting.

 

And so when we venerate their sacrifice, we’re venerating the basis upon which Australian sovereignty is even possible. And whatever criticisms you have of the various wars, and I have criticisms, I don’t think we should have been in Iraq, that was a war for Israel. I don’t think we should have been in Afghanistan, that was completely irrelevant to our national interests and so on.

 

But that nevertheless, and obviously I don’t think that we should have gone to war against the Germans. I think there was a complete failure for the British Empire which ended up collapsing due to prosecuting that war against its interests when the Germans didn’t even want war with the British Empire. In fact, they wanted peace. And that’s well documented.

 

Host: I just saw a hilarious comment. Sorry, I saw a hilarious comment. Don’t let Joel monologue for two hours. He won’t stop unless he interrupts him. Let’s go back. Let’s go, let’s go back to this.

 

So it’s interesting because I think that this, like I said from my original question, this course wouldn’t have happened with regards to the last three days, the longevity of this event at the Anzac Day Dawn Service if it wasn’t someone as polarizing as Jacob. Now one thing that I wanted to bring up, which I thought was just absolutely unbelievable and it actually just proved us all right. It was stunning when I saw this morning.

 

So this was actually, I posted this at 6:30 in the morning the other day because it was this, it was so outrageous! I have been documenting that the anti-vilification amendments that you guys are so against as well and I think rightfully everyone else is against it.

 

The fact that the Victorian government actually sought legal advice to see if they could prosecute what Jacob had done that day. It’s come out, I think it was yesterday that they couldn’t lay charges. They wanted to summons him for some sort of charge that they wanted to make up like they did with your stunt at in Adelaide on, was it Australia Day.

 

But I don’t think it’s landed anything. I don’t think there’s a charge that’s landed yet. But let’s roll this.

 

Joel Davis: Oh no, I’ve been charged from Adelaide. A lot of us are still fighting it in the courts.

 

Host: Yeah, but I’m talking about, I’m just saying this.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Host: Nothing stuck.

 

Joel Davis: My understanding is that he hasn’t been charged. The police, I understand, said to Jacob that he could expect a summons over an offensive behaviour charge. But that’s different than the anti-vilification.

 

[17:44]

 

Host: Yeah. Let’s roll this. And then I want to get your thoughts on what said.

 

So this is more of a news sort of commentary on it. It’s not any one politician talking about it.

 

But I think it’s interesting because it’s basically vindicated that they’re going to try to use it to prosecute anyone that tries to be pro-Australia in any which way. It’s not going to be used to prosecute anyone that offends the Indians or the jewish community. These, these laws in my opinion were amended in response to a hoax and then a whole bunch of other criminal offences that were done by organised crime. We spoke about this the other time on stream and then all of a sudden it’s come out that they’ve passed these laws on the back of a hoax and now there’s an investigation to see if we can repeal them, at least in New South Wales. Victoria, I’m not so sure that’s going to happen. But let’s roll this and then we’ll talk about it. Hopefully the audio works.

 

Let me just make sure. Unmuted. Okay. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Host: Okay, let me just. I think I might have to reshare the reshare the screen.

 

Let me just quickly switch back.

 

Sky News: Protests at yesterday’s Anzac Day service in Melbourne are unlikely to meet the criminal threshold under Victorian anti-vilification laws. Convicted neo-Nazi Jacob Hersant led boos and chanting during the Welcome to Country according to the Age. Government and legal sources don’t believe the booing constitutes punishment under Hate Speech laws. The neo-Nazi disruptions during the Anzac Day Dawn Service at Melbourne Shrine of Remembrance have been condemned.

 

Host: Yeah, so, yeah, so they’re just talking about the fact that they’ve tried to see if they can prosecute Jacob under the new Hate Speech laws, the anti-vilification amendment. So what are your thoughts on the fact that you guys are being, you’re the primary example of basically all of these laws that they’ve passed over the last three months now. And it’s just so happened to be under the, like the consequential, the, it’s the consequence of these things happening to you guys now is off the back of being pro-Australia.

 

What are your thoughts on that?

 

And do you think that it’s probably no surprise, but is it a surprise that you guys are like exhibit A on the chopping block for this, for these laws?

 

Joel Davis: No, it’s not a surprise. I think we’re probably within a national context the most high profile Nazis on the planet today. Maybe the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, you could say are more high profile.

 

But in terms of like the general political discourse of a country, most places they just kind of ignore people like us. But probably, I would say partly due to the type of activism that we do, which is particularly provocative and interesting to people, but also due to a hysterical political class, they kind of fixate upon us in a very intense way. And anytime we do anything in public, apparently we need to be. The police have to do something. There’s all this pressure from communists, from Left-wing journalists that are secretly communists or maybe not so secretly communists and from jewish groups and so on to come after us. And you know, obviously it’s ridiculous!

 

But when it comes to this, it has to be said the anti-vilification laws that were passed recently in Victoria actually aren’t in effect yet. They don’t go into effect until September.

 

So they’re talking about the old anti-vilification laws. The ones that go into effect in September are so broad it’s hard to know exactly how far they could go. So I guess we’re going to have to wait and see after September how that goes.

 

So that’s part of the reason why they couldn’t prosecute. The same reason why I still haven’t been charged even though they raided my house and took my stuff and said I was under investigation for vilification when I did the jews Hate Freedom rally. Because under the old laws, there’s a political speech exemption and there’s a much higher threshold that needs to be met for what constitutes vilification. Under the new laws that have been passed but aren’t in effect until September on a criminal basis. Basically they can just say that, well, Aboriginals are offended or jews are offended or whoever the supposed group being targeted is offended. And so at that point, you know, who knows how broad that’s going to be. We’re going to have to wait and see until it goes through the courts, I guess.

 

I don’t think the laws are constitutional. They removed the political speech exemption that was originally in the originally proposed laws at the behest of the Liberal Party. A Liberal Party requested that at the behest of the jewish lobby. They said we’re not going to support these laws unless you remove the political speech exemption. Which is what makes the laws constitutional because we have a constitutional right to political communication.

 

But yeah, there’s no equivalent, there’s no like equivalent exemption in the new laws. They’ve been completely removed. Liberal Party ended up voting against them because for some other reason.

 

But basically they just kept the political speech or they kept the kind of removal of the political speech exemption out of the, out of the legislation. So the legislation in my opinion is unconstitutional. We’re going to test it in the courts.

 

But basically there is no exemptions other than the so-called Sam Kerr exemption which, …

 

Host: Yeah, I gathered that.

 

[23:35]

 

Joel Davis: Which was discussed. Yeah, which was discussed in the media, which is that, well if you’re of a so-called disadvantaged group and you vilify a so-called advantaged group, meaning if you’re non-White and you talk shit about White people or maybe if you’re a homosexual and you talk shit about straight people or something, then apparently you can say whatever you want. And that was the Greens asked for that and then Labor put that in order to get the Greens vote to get the law passed despite not having the support of the Liberals. So total shit show! But that’s the laws. So again they’re not in effect yet.

 

But yeah, under the current laws, like I said, he might still get charged with offensive behaviour, which is a really vague law and we’ll see if that goes to court.

 

But it’s a very minor charge that doesn’t have. The anti-vilification laws are very serious with like multiple year jail terms, whereas the offensive behaviour charges, a very weak summary offence that it’s on, you’re unlikely to do jail time for. So they might not even bother because they don’t think it’s worth their time and energy to go after him for it. Maybe they will. We’ll see. I haven’t heard that he’s been charged yet. I’m sure it’ll be publicized if that does happen.

 

Host: Yeah, yesterday that they’re unlikely to charge. And you’re right to. I think you’re right to have reminded me. I remember I saw what’s his name from Victoria, the Libertarian MP. He was actually there until four in the morning. They passed just like they passed the amendments in New South Wales at like 4 or 5 o’clock in the morning. So even I was unaware that they were actually. They actually re tabled it to get these laws passed.

 

But one thing they did bring up in his video, he said that they don’t come into law until later this year. So there’s enough time for people going into the election next year in Victoria to at least experience it so they can say:

 

“Oh, maybe we need to push out the Labor government and then hopefully Liberal Party has enough seats in the upper and lower house to be able to repeal it.”

 

Joel Davis: There’s no way the Liberal Party will repeal it because the Liberal Party in Victoria are totally controlled by the jewish lobby more than any other state in Australia. I mean they’re controlled nationally but the jewish community is particularly, politically, active and hysterical in Melbourne and they have a vice grip over the Liberal Party. Like I said the Liberal Party refused to vote for this originally because it was too lenient on people who were engaging in political speech. Because obviously the jews want to basically ban anyone from engaging in political speech that they don’t like that’s critical of Israel or the jewish lobby or the jewish community. And so they asked for that to be removed and they got it.

 

And then they started going on about a very, like a small kind of piece of minutiae in the law. They didn’t actually oppose it in principle in any meaningful way. And they could then go to the people and pretend that they opposed it.

 

But if you followed it closely like I did, you would realise that they’re scum! Like they’re complete frauds, they’re liars! And I fucking hate the Liberal Party! We’re not going to get anything from voting Liberal Party back in Victoria that we want. We won’t. There will be a complete disappointment.

 

What is necessary in Australian politics is for Right-wingers to completely defect from the Liberal Party and start voting for the Right-wing minor parties.

 

And right now in Australian politics, supposedly the centre line is drawn between Liberal and Labor. But Liberal and Labor are the same! There is barely any distinction of meaning, a meaningful distinction between these two parties. We need to redraw the line between Liberal and the rest.

 

Host: So the election’s coming up on Saturday, right? You would have thought that Peter Dutton would be so empowered off the back of all of those firebombings, the graffiti all over the joint, the, what was it called, the synagogue being burnt down in Melbourne and then all of these laws being passed in response to it and the caravan in New South Wales in general.

 

You would have thought that off, just off the back of that. And then Sky News broadcasted a massive anti-semitism Summit that Peter Dutton would be supercharged and empowered off the back of that he would be a dollar three favourite by the bookies to win! Just off the back of all of those consequential series of events.

 

You know, that was like a five month lead up going into this election where he had all of that galvanised support from the jewish community, from the lobby groups and the sentiment in the public sentiment was there as well. How come he’s not winning off the back of that? I’m curious to know what you think of that because you would have thought that that would be the circumstances that he would face him.

 

But right now he’s basically given up. I think just. I watched an interview that he just did with Shari Marks and no surprise there, they’re trying to revive the campaign in the last three days before Saturday.

 

But yeah, what are your thoughts on that? Because I would think that off the back of the last five, six months, he’d steamroll Albo because of the sentiment was there, the public sentiment there. The laws were passed. He was the face of it in terms of the political leadership.

 

But you know, his trending is gonna be probably getting spilled as leader maybe if he loses quite convincingly on Saturday.

 

[29:18]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, his seat, the seat of Dixon, which is his seat in Brisbane. He only won by less than 2% margin in the last election and I could see him potentially losing there, particularly if the Trumpet of Patriots voters turn on him as they’ve been instructed to by the Trumpet of Patriots controversial how to vote cards.

 

But yeah, the story is a few things.

 

Number one, have you noticed how since the election was called, they really kind of shut up about the jews, like the first day or two, they made sure that they went to the synagogue and you know, showed the jews that they were on their side.

 

But obviously they focus grouped it and realised that it was incredibly unpopular with the general public. The general public are not interested in Israel. They don’t care about Israel, they don’t care about the jewish community and they don’t support taking away our freedom of speech. And they’re sick of hearing about anti-semitism. So they completely shut up about that.

 

Host: Since the election campaign, they’ve barely brought it up. I think you’re right. They’ve only brought it up maybe once or twice at the early days of the election. They have not brought it up once since. Nothing!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Liberal Party had all the momentum before they started passing all these attacks on free speech. That was when they had the momentum late last year. October, November, December, they looked like it was inevitable. It seemed like Albanese was done, Labor were done. The election was going to have to be called soon. And when it was going to be called, they weren’t going to have a hope.

 

And then the Liberal Party decided to champion the cause of the jews and the cause of freedom of speech. And obviously labour were just as complicit in all of this. But I think that turned off a lot of their base.

 

And the story of this election has not been labour accumulating a great degree of popularity. Labor has, they’ve increased the Indian vote, they’ve increased the immigrant vote. And immigrants, particularly Indians, love voting labour and so that’s bolstering the Labor vote. But the real story of this election is how the Liberals have lost votes to the Right. The Right-wing minor party vote is going to be higher than ever before this election in Australian history. I saw a news poll the other day that had One Nation polling over 10%. And that’s not even including all the other parties that Rennicks, People First Party, they’ll probably do decent. Trump and the Patriots will get some votes. The Libertarians will get some votes. The Family first, the Shooters and Fishers and so on. It could add up to about 20% quite feasibly in this election.

 

So what Dutton and the Liberals have done have completely lost their own base and justifiably so. I’ve never seen such strong public sentiment on being against the Uni-Party and so many Right-wing attacks on the Liberals. And the Liberals have failed dismally to win us over, basically. People like you and I who are obviously, kind of obviously we don’t have the same ideology but we’re in this kind of populist right kind of milieu. We’re not being won over. And this is in the context of in European politics, conservative parties in like basically every European country have shrunk and have become dwarfed by populist parties that are kind of attacking them from the Right. In almost every European country.

 

Obviously in America, we’ve seen Trump kind of railroad his agenda into the Republican Party where 10 years ago Trump seemed like a radical and an outsider. Now he’s a normal Republican. The Republican Party has been remade in his image and obviously I’m not a Trump supporter and it’s nowhere near enough the changes that have been made, but it’s clearly a step in the direction of populism and away from what conservatism was in the standard, you know, early 2010s conception.

 

Liberal Party, however, have not changed. They have completely maintained the trajectory that conservatism was on before this kind of populist backlash. They haven’t adapted to it at all! They’ve cucked on every single issue! They I was watching your coverage actually of the debate last night and it was the first debate I watched between Albanese and Dutton because honestly, life is too short. But I thought it’d be interesting because I wanted to see if they would talk about the booing on Anzac Day. And they did. I was interested to hear what they would have to say. But there was one point where Dutton attacked Albanese on immigration when they were talking about housing and he said:

 

“Oh, this Labor government have increased immigration by 70% on what it was before Covid and blah, blah, blah. So we’re going to cut immigration by 25%!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Hey, wait a second!”

 

So we have like ridiculously over the top immigration. We have a historic housing crisis. It’s caused by immigration. No matter what anyone says. It’s the case. In Canada they had a similar housing crisis and the Left-wing government party in power cut immigration to Net Zero. Imagine if Labor a year ago cut immigration to Net Zero to try and like win voters back from the coalition. That’s basically what happened in Canada and it’s kind of worked for them. It looks like they’re going to win the Canadian election, which is coming up very shortly as well.

 

Host: Yeah, but I just saw a story on that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the conservatives here basically have accepted according all the mainstream news and they’ve finally accepted after we’ve been arguing with them for years. That immigration is causing the housing crisis! It’s not that we’re not building enough houses. Australia builds more houses per capita than any other Western country except I think Switzerland. So why do we have a housing crisis? Because we have the highest rate of immigration per capita of almost any Western country. That’s why. It’s obvious, it’s demand.

 

[35:08]

 

Host: I don’t know if you saw this story, but this came. This was in the news today. I only just heard about it a couple of hours ago.

 

So they’re apparently bumping up the student visa fees by, I think it was like $400 per, per application.

 

And then there’s going to be approximately like, I think it was about half a million people had applied for it. Let me see if I can find the number. And then only like a quarter of a million. Only a quarter of a million people came to Australia on student visas. And this is just student visas.

 

So not only are they still letting in between 250,000 to half a million depending on how many students show up, they’re bumping up the price of it so they can make more revenue off the back of it. This was hidden in the Labor budget and only just came out in the news today.

 

Joel Davis: But look at this. Labor has promised to cap international student commencements at 270,000, while the opposition has said it will be 240,000. That’s like, what even is the fucking point? Yeah, what even is the point? Like, Liberals could have just lied and pretended that they were going to cut immigration and then just like what Albanese did. Albanese lied before the last election about immigration and then just opened the floodgates. They could have just lied and won, but they’re that in the pocket of the property lobby.

 

The number one industry in Australia that donates to political parties is the property lobby. I talked about this in my article in The Noticer on why we should put the Liberals last this election. And the largest recipient of property lobby property industry donations is the Liberal Party.

 

So if the Labor Party is willing to bring in this many immigrants and the property industry still thinks they get a better deal with Liberal than Labor, that goes to show that they’re pretty confident that the Liberals aren’t going to cut immigration by any significant degree. The number one donor to the Liberal Party is Harry Triguboff, Australia’s richest property developer. He’s a jew as well, by the way. He runs Meriton or his company, Meriton Properties or whatever.

 

So that’s why that’s why basically The Liberals have lost this election because they care more about getting money from the property lobby than about actually winning elections. They would rather lose the election and get that sweet property bucks in the pocket. Trump lied and campaign on an issue that they could easily win on, which is just cutting immigration.

 

Host: Do you think Trump lied with these policy of mass deportations then? Because the numbers don’t stack up, at least at the moment.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it seems, yeah, of course. Seems like he lied, but that’s normal. That’s these cuckservative leaders always lie. But the Liberals are that in the pocket of these donors. They didn’t even have the temerity to lie. That’s how pathetic it is.

 

I mean, I talked about this in the we need to understand the Liberal Party are a Left-wing party. They’re not a Right-wing party. Give me one conservative policy that they have. They literally kicked someone out of the party the other day because he said that women shouldn’t be in combat roles in the army. I mean,

 

Host: I posted about that.

 

Joel Davis: That’s insane! What, like what are their other policies? It was a Liberal Party that legalised gay marriage. It was the Liberal Party in the 1970s that made multiculturalism official state policy in Australia. Under, in the late 70s. It was the Liberal Party that took away our guns. In the 90s, it was a Liberal Party that opened up the floodgates to mass immigration to these insane levels that we’ve been receiving in, under Howard. It was Howard that really opened it up. So Liberal Party again and again and again has been at the forefront of all these Left-wing agendas that are destroying our country that conservatives hate. If they keep voting Liberal. It’s like, when are you going to realise that these guys are your enemies? Stop voting for them!

 

Host: Yeah. And just like this video here, it gives ammunition, easy ammunition for the Labor Party to be able to use these talking points to galvanise their support.

 

So this video is from a couple weeks ago. Now Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has once again taken aim at the Liberal Party candidates, slamming one for blaming the Illuminati for Australia’s downfall, another for claiming, claiming feminists caused Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss. And Benjamin Britton, the candidate that you’re talking about, for saying that women shouldn’t serve on the front lines of the ADF. I’ll play the video because like I was saying just a second ago, it just gives them easy talking points to target the Liberal Party and just keep on firing at them and galvanizing their support off the back of it.

 

Albanese: And this week if we look at the seats that we are hoping to be successful in, they include Leichhardt with Matt Smith and you compare it with the other mob. I mean they’ve got candidates, they got a candidate for the Senate here who’s connected up with Illuminati rubbish! I mean that is who they are running in seats. They got a bloke in Queensland in Leichardt in a held LMP seat who’s a cooker who blames feminists for U. S election results. What is he saying? Women shouldn’t vote? I mean these people have selected shockers. They had to get rid of their candidate in Whitlam because he came out with all sorts of theories about women not running, not being allowed to be in combat forces.

 

Host: So yeah, it just, it just gives them easy talking points to target the Liberal Party and you know, my sort of knowledge and experience around these like this political commentary space is only just begun from the top of Covid.

 

But I think that it’s just embarrassing to see the Liberal Party leadership.

 

[41:12]

 

Joel Davis: Just how out of touch are these people? Do they really think that people want women serving on the front lines? Like that’s insane! Like Albanese is talking about it like oh these crazy lunatics, these fascist, you know, conspiracy theorists that think women shouldn’t be on the front lines in war. Like what? Like wasn’t that only changed like a few years ago? And it’s insane! Like what you think women aren’t going to vote for you unless you, unless you let them go and fight on the front lines in war. Women don’t want to do that! It’s ridiculous! It’s like this Welcome to Country thing. They were talking down to us and to the Australian people like oh like these crazy extremists that are against the Welcome to Country. We all support that. And then it’s like no we don’t. [chuckling] The average Australian does not support any of this nonsense! And the Liberal Party are so out of touch. They think the crap that they say on the media on even on Sky News, they think that this journalist Canberra, inner city Sydney and Melbourne bubble reflects what Australians, like normal Australians think and feel. These people are completely out of touch and they’re a minority.

 

But instead of actually trying to appeal to the average Aussie battler, the kind of person who would actually vote for a proper Right-wing candidate, instead they’re trying to chase after these like Teal seats or something in the inner cities and appeal to like deranged, you know, rich Boomer women who like watch the ABC all day! And it’s like, why are you chasing these lunatics? Go after your actual base. But it just shows they’re not actually a Right-wing party. They don’t give a shit about any of the values that we have. And they need to be treated as a Left-wing party and we need to give our support to the actual Right-wing parties that are, that exist. They’re not perfect.

 

I don’t think Rennick or the policies with Trumpeter Patriots are perfect. They don’t go anywhere near far enough obviously for my liking. But they do seem like as if they’re actually genuinely decent policies that would make the country better. That if the Liberal Party adopted the same policies, they would probably win. It would win on those policies. The only reason these smaller parties aren’t able to compete yet is because people are so stuck in the red team, blue team dichotomy, they think they have to pick one of these two options.

 

Host: So let’s talk about party politics. So I’ve got this article from the other day. I think this was just yesterday that I had up before here. So it goes:

 

“Neo-Nazis quietly forming a political party to try to get around the law.”

 

The interesting thing about this article and this story is the fact that they want to try to close the loopholes that they’re accusing you guys of trying to exploit in being able to have the political freedom of association. Now I’ve just looked it up here:

 

“An eligible member when registering a political party with the AA C is someone who doesn’t legally count towards 1, 500 minimum members and then an ineligible member type.”

 

So I’m just trying to find ones that wouldn’t, that would probably hinder you guys, because I’m interested to see how they would stop you.

 

So at the moment the “ineligible member types” is someone that’s not enrolled. It’s a duplicate member. Fake or false member. Underage person, dead person. The details are wrong. You’ve withdrawn consent. Which means if someone tells the AC I’m not a member during the membership audit, they will be disqualified. Non Australian citizens and members of the registered parties.

 

So it looks like unless you, as long as you follow all of those requirements, the there’s currently no loopholes that they’re accusing you of that they can not approve your application.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but they even say in this article that experts agree that they can’t stop us.

 

Host: Yeah, so that’s what I want to get to. So let’s talk about that.

 

So what’s the idea behind that? Because I think it’s interesting that you guys want to do this, not because you want to form a party and take a stab at politics. I think it’s more interesting the commentary behind it. So what you were just saying before, the fact that they’re going to try to shut you down and breach the Constitution for you because you know, you guys have the right to be able to do this. You’re not breaching any of these requirements from what I can tell. This is probably the only requirement that I would see that would be that they would try to drag, drag you through the mud having ineligible members because you guys are so, you know, polarizing in the eyes of the government, the eyes of the AEC, perhaps.

 

Joel Davis: They can’t, they don’t have a legal basis to do that.

 

And actually there’s strong High Court precedent and constitutional precedent on that they can’t ban political parties in this country. If you follow the reasonable, very reasonable, apolitical, necessarily apolitical requirements of the Electoral act and the AEC regulations, which are very reasonable and basic. And you just basically need your 1500 members. They can’t stop you. They tried to ban the Communist party in the 1950s. They weren’t allowed to by the High Court. They then had a referendum. They asked the Australian people, can you give us the authority to ban political parties? And the Australian people, at the height of the Cold War, when everyone hated Communism, they said:

 

“No, we don’t want to give the government that ability!”

 

And they maintained that anyone can form a political party in this country. Then in the early 1970s, multiple National Socialist political parties were formed and contested elections. There’s precedent.

 

[46:59]

 

Host: So what about these two requirements? So not genuinely a political party. If the group is truly organised for a political party example, it’s a sham front. They can reject it. What if they say to you:

 

“Oh, you guys are just trying to exploit these loopholes, so we’re going to reject it.”

 

Joel Davis: They are going have to prove that in court. We actually want to. We actually think we can get people elected. We believe we got good candidates and we’ve got a compelling campaign strategy. We think we can get people into Parliament and we want to have a crack. Like, we actually think a lot of people would vote for us. We think we’ve got great policies that no one else is offering and that we’re interesting. I think there’s a lot of Australians that are just completely fed up with this political system that will go:

 

“Fuck it! I’m voting Nazi!”

 

You know, like I think there is a market for us out there.

 

Host: What about this requirement? So your party name must not copy, resemble or cause confusion with the existing political party. And then prohibited words as well. What if they turn around, say the National Socialist, words, those., …

 

Joel Davis: We’re not gonna, we’re not going to register at the National Socialist Network. That’s not what the name of the party will be. And that’s not our intent. We’re not going to register as a National Socialist with National socials in the name of the party. That’s not the name. And yeah, you can’t register a party that has. But even so, I don’t think they could actually ban. If you wanted to register National Socialists. I don’t think they could. I don’t think they have grounds like to say that’s offensive because it’s not like, it’s not. You’d have to like have like a swear word in the name or something crazy! Which obviously we wouldn’t do. That’s insane! So I think we’ll be fine.

 

And at the end of the day if they knock back one name, we’ll just come up with another name. Like there’s a point at which like legally they got no leg to stand on. They’re just going to have to let us get registered.

 

And what I would say is, well, to the system is, isn’t that what you want us to do? Haven’t you been saying like you’re against extremism and you don’t want political violence and all this kind of stuff? Okay, well we’re trying to just be law abiding and participate in the political process like everyone else and form our party and let the people decide. If they don’t want to vote for us, they don’t have to. If they do, they can. We’re living a liberal democracy. Isn’t that what you want? Don’t you want us trying to work within the system and do things the right way, the legal way? What happens if you don’t let us form a party? Well, number one, you’re going to de-legitimize, you’re going to break the Constitution, we’re going to beat you in High Court.

 

So you’re going to give us a huge High Court victory when we beat you and force you to let us have a political party and something going to promote the party even more and get us even more votes. So go right ahead and do that.

 

But second of all, you’re also going to basically de-legitimize the system that we don’t actually have a liberal democracy to everyone. And number three, what the ASIO have said, what Mike Burgess has said, the head of ASIO when they grill him in the Senate kind of inquiries and so on about us and about extremism, is that the likelihood of extremism coming from the so-called, you know, White supremacist far-Right, whatever spectrum is not people from us, not people from our organisation, but people who become demoralised, who think that there’s no chance for us to have any effect in politics, there’s no chance at political victory, or a political solution that sit there and engage in some kind of lone wolf attack because they just sit there stewing and feeling black pilled and then do something stupid. That’s what Mike Burgess said many years in a row is the greatest threat. So let us give them something to believe in. They won’t commit a terrorist attack because they’ll think:

 

“Well, we’ve got, here’s a potentially a political solution. We’ve got the party, we’ve got the boys running, got campaigns. I can get involved, I can do, I can be a productive member of civil society and I can argue my case, my reasonable, rational case for my views in the public square.”

 

That’s supposedly the system that we have. So just let, like, let us participate. If you don’t like us, don’t vote for us like anyone else.

 

Host: And they, I’m just looking up here, it’s quite interesting. So Jordan McSweeney, which I know it’s kind of strange, but this is Jordan McSweeney, this young, these people, …

 

Joel Davis: Jordan McSweeney is a full on communist, this is a full on communist far-Left lunatic extremist! And they will him out as an expert. Imagine if I became an expert on the far-Left and the media started interviewing me about the Greens and Antifa and Victorian socialists and I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m an expert on communism!”

 

And I went into the media and started like, just attacking them in the media as an expert. That’s basically what these people are like. They’re not experts, they’re activists!

 

[51:42]

 

Host: Yeah, but well that’s what I’m saying. Like just off the back of his profile, Jordan McSweeney researches the FAR right with a focus on the organisation and communication of far-Right parties. And movements. He’s the author of Far Right Political Parties in Australia. His work has been published. Blah, blah, blah. Jordan is a senior research fellow at the centre of Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. So it’s no surprise that he resides in Canberra. But going to the article, it’s he proves your point for all he’s worth. Jordan McSweeney who researches the far-Right in Australia expects if the group does clear the 1500 member threshold it will be approved as a registered party. But standing up candidates to drive real political change is unlikely to be their main game.

 

So that’s up to debate. You’ve just given your opinion on that. But he even says that as long as you have 1500 ballot members it’s not like they’re going to be able to stop you because you do meet those requirements. I can’t see at least from what I’ve read here any reason why they could. That’s why I brought up every reason that they could possibly do it focusing on the members side of things because I think if anything they’re going to try to target you guys individually like they have already.

 

So let’s talk about the election. I mean I don’t really have too much to say off it. I’ve put out how to vote cards because I just wanted to put out a resource there and just say hey, this is what we think would possibly give provide us with the best possible outcome.

 

But from what I’ve done over the last couple of years with the streams specifically we’ve all realised there’s been a big learning curve for me just how valuable the Senate is and getting the best possible candidates in the Senate to stop these laws passing.

 

What are your thoughts on like this week, this is the final week of the election. What are your thoughts on the actual election itself, the campaign, the campaign strategies of both parties? And do you have support for anyone in particular one candidate or any particular party going into Saturday?

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I’ve already said is that I think if you’re in Queensland you should put Gerard Rennick number one. I think he has, I think he’s the best option that is likely to get realistic, that could get elected. I think basically wherever you are you should put all the Right-wing minor parties first before you put any of the other preferences. Do not put the Liberal Party above any other Right-wing parties. Now my personal view is that the Liberal Party should be put last. I would vote everyone and personally I’ll be voting everyone ahead of the Liberal Party. We’re putting them dead last in both houses.

 

And the reason for this is that I think they need to be punished. They are traitors. Labor, the Greens, everyone who has their head screwed on understands the problem with the Left-wing parties and that they’re not our friends and that they’re working against us. But what Australians need to see is they need to see the Liberal Party losing support and the Right-wing minor parties gaining as much support relatively as possible.

 

So they start to believe in the ability of the Right-wing minor parties or some combination of them to rise up and take the Right-wing vote off a Liberal Party. And that’s going to take multiple election cycles. But that needs to be our objective.

 

And so we need to start working towards that by basically sabotaging the Liberals as much as possible and destroying them as much as possible to create space for the further Right parties to rise.

 

And then we could have a coalition of further Right parties that will actually be far more responsive to our concerns, that’ll be, that’ll have far better policies that will actually fight and take on the Left and it’d be much better for the country. And I want our party to be one of the parties in that coalition. That’s an objective that we have maybe in the coming decade or so. like I said earlier, we need to redraw the line, the centre line from between Liberal and Labor to between the Liberals and the Right-wing minor parties. That’s what we need to start to draw our friend-enemy, distinction.

 

So I think, yeah, in Queensland put Rennick number one. I would say in New South Wales. I like Greg Kelly. Not everything he does I agree with. I was upset at him some of his remarks the other day and I get upsetting him from time to time.

 

But I think he’s a pretty good candidate and I think you should put him number one in New South Wales, considering the other options.

 

But yeah, in general, generally speaking, whatever state you’re in, just put the Right-wing minor parties at the top. I don’t think One Nation deserves to be at the top of your ballot, because One Nation are the most acquiescent of all the Right-wing minor parties to the Liberal Party. They created a preference deal that will help the Liberals get elected in a lot of seats. They never attacked the Liberal Party. Pauline Hanson has openly stated this election cycle that she wants Peter Dutton to become prime minister.

 

[56:40]

 

And I think that One Nation there’s a lot of reasons to think that it’s actually a front, a Liberal Party front. I’ve been saying this for years. The James Ashby, the homosexual who’s Pauline Hanson’s right hand man, who basically runs the party, in all intents and purposes, he is from the Liberal Party. His claim to fame was being the sexual assault victim of Peter Slipper. So he’s having gay sex in the Liberal Party and then defects from the Liberal Party and then now he’s basically running the One Nation Party. I don’t really trust him. I think he’s probably an agent of the Liberal Party dirty tricks department, which is a real department that exists.

 

So I don’t trust him. And I don’t trust the One Nation Party. And when the rubber hit the road over Christmas time, when they were attacking our freedom of speech, where was Pauline Hanson? Where was Malcolm Roberts? They were sitting on their hands saying, doing nothing.

 

Meanwhile the Libertarians were fighting, Ralph Babet was fighting. And he’s not technically Trumpet of Patriots, but basically is. He was fighting the other Right-wing minor parties. Rennick was fighting.

 

And so I think they should be rewarded because they were actually standing up for us when it actually mattered. Even though it was futile. They were standing up when no one else was. And One Nation said and did nothing. They took the L. And then Malcolm Roberts goes before one of these Senate committees and I saw a clip of this and he decides to ask our intelligence, the heads of our intelligence agencies and police agencies, not what is going on with these false flag hoaxes that seem to be connected to the state of Israel as foreign state actor. You know, Rennick was calling that out. He was calling out the Mossad, he was calling out the false flags. So was Babbitt. What was Malcolm Roberts doing? Malcolm Roberts was saying:

 

“Oh, what are we going to do about all these anti-semitic attacks against jews?”

 

So he’s in the pocket of the jews and the Zionists. And I think One Nation are in general.

 

Whereas I see more dynamism from these other Right-wing minor parties, more independents. Trumpet of Patriots. I didn’t like the name, I didn’t like the approach. I don’t think that Suellen is very personable. Whoever’s running it. She seems like an AI bot. Their logo seems like it’s AI generated.

 

Host: What definitely is AI generated. The logo.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everything seems AI generated and then they just there’s something inauthentic about it. But I’ve been actually kind of slowly won over. Their policies are pretty decent. Their messaging has become decent in recent weeks. They’ve been taking on the Liberal Party and attacking the Liberal Party, attacking the Uni-Party.

 

And I think that’s fantastic! That’s what we want to see from the populist Right-wing. We want them taking on the Uni-Party rather than being a kind of preference capture for people that are kind of further to the right of the Liberal Party. And so I’ve been impressed with them. I think they deserve to go above One Nation.

 

Rennick, very impressed. Great policies. Intelligent man’s smartest man in the Senate. He’s got good nationalist policies. Seems to be a man of integrity. I don’t agree with him on everything. I think he’s too soft on mass immigration and things like that. But he’s still a restrictionist and he’s solid on free speech. He’s solid on nationalist policy across the board. And he called out Israeli and jewish influence at the decisive point. And you think he proved that he’s a genuine actor.

 

Host: Yeah, I think the most important thing with these guys and I’ve backed these guys as well, I actually voted for Craig Kelly myself in New South Wales.

 

But with regards to One Nation specifically, just I’ve got here, you know, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation is just behind the Greens at the moment in terms of party percentage coming into this election.

 

And I think our strategy with at least our how to vote cards and most of the how to vote cards that are out there from independent sources like us, the strategy behind putting them there is just making sure that we get people that are actually going to have the best chance to win! Like in the Hunter, you’ve got. What’s his name?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, in the Lower house, if you’ve got a One Nation, like a lot of the lower house seats don’t have that many candidates. Most seats are not going to have a Rennick candidate.

 

But yeah, in the Hunter seat in Newcastle, I saw that the One Nation is polling great there. Like I would put them one there because it’d be better for them to win, obviously.

 

Host: Yeah, so that’s what I’m getting at.

 

So our strategy was, despite the fact that One Nation has lots of flaws that you’ve just laid out, we want to put the best possible candidate up that we know that has the best possible chance of actually winning.

 

And I think it’s just a matter of getting them to be responsive like the Craig Kelly’s, like the Gerard Rennicks. Because I think one valuable thing that these guys do that other candidates and other politicians don’t do is that they don’t respond to us. They’ve made themselves very valuable to our grievances and to at least have some sort of discourse.

 

Even if they don’t change their mind or even if they just decide not I’m stuck on this side this idea or this policy, at least they’re responsive. Other politicians, …

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely!

 

[1:02:03]

 

Host: They either don’t give us a chance or we have to force a chance our way. We have to you know, throw like literally like the guys over the last few weeks, like Lawrence from what’s news. He had to literally throw himself into lion’s den at that Medicare press conference and just say:

 

“Hey, what the fuck’s going on with the 1.8 million people that you’re bringing in through the immigration policy over the next five years?”

 

But yeah, I think that’s the most valuable thing.

 

So let’s see what happens. We’ve got the best candidates up from One Nation and everywhere else we want to try to stack the Senate because the most important thing in my eyes is to stop these policies getting through to become law. I really think that if the, if the Senate is still in a position where they have a majority the Liberal-Labour more labour than not at least from up current current trends, they’re going to start bringing back the misinformation Bill again. It’s basically going to be like deja have you from last year where we have to start trying to petition independent Senators again to stop stop the Bill having the numbers. But let’s see what happens.

 

I kind of excited but kind of let down as well by the fact that we’ve got to choose between a shit leader in Dutton that basically backed all of these Uni-party policies and created a lot of the infrastructure for you know, the what’s it called the Esafety Commission is a big one that we debated and spoke about a lot over the last couple of years. Them taking down our accounts. They took down a lot of your accounts. They took down a lot of my accounts during Covid. But let’s see what happens.

 

Hopefully One Nation wins and then hopefully we can clean up One Nation a bit to make sure that they’re a bit more responsive to what what we want. Because at the moment I feel like they’re serving the Liberal Party and they’re the Pauline Hanson leadership is a bit too stuck and stuck in their own old ways. I don’t think that the they really.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, the thing with One Nation is that Pauline Hanson is written into their constitution. Their members don’t have the ability to vote her out and vote other leadership in.

 

Host: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And the members have basically no rights at all! There’s no branches in the One Nation Party. I’ve had friends try to sign up to One Nation to help them campaign this election, and they don’t even get them called back, you know, around the country. And I’ve heard this before, the Queensland election, the same thing. They’re like professional losers. They can be good people that can be put up as candidates. Like, they can somehow get the endorsement in these parties.

 

And so I’m not saying put One Nation last or anything. It’s still good for them to do well, even if I don’t like the party because it shows that the electorate is moving rightward and it’s stretching out the conversation. Yeah. They’re still better than. Obviously, they’re actually worth putting in over, like someone from one of the major parties. Like, they are going to vote better.

 

But in situations like in Queensland, where you can choose between Rennick or Malcolm Roberts, Rennick deserves your vote over Roberts. Roberts hasn’t earned it. Rennick has. And like in New South Wales, Craig Kelly deserves your vote over One Nation. Like, Craig Kelly tried to join One Nation tried to literally, like a year and a bit ago, he tried to push a strong campaign against immigration and then got frozen out of the party and frustrated and left because they’re professional losers that don’t actually want to take on the government. So then he went to the Libertarians, and now the New South Wales Libertarians are pretty good. They put him in. And I don’t like the Victorian Libertarians, but the New South Wales wing of the Libertarians are pretty decent. And so good luck to him! I think he has a good chance of winning. He has brand recognition. He almost won. He almost got in last time. He missed out by not much when he was running for the UAP at the last election. I would like to take Craig Kelly in the Senate. He’s obviously better.

 

And like you said, Kelly and Rennick, they’ll actually respond on Twitter. And they’re responsive to people like us, and they’re responsive to voters and they seem sincere, even if they’re kind of like Boomerish and they’re a little bit behind the times or behind where the Right-wing is going to go in the coming decades. They’re still well intentioned in my opinion.

 

So yeah, I definitely endorse them too. I don’t really know enough about the candidates in some of like South Australia, West Australia, to be honest. But I would just say like just put all the Right-wing minor parties near the top. That’s all that matters. And I would say again, put Liberal Party last. They need to be punished, even if it’s short term. Maybe they might do one or two things better than labour, but it’s not worth it. Like punishing them and destroying them and making space for a real Right-wing to emerge in the coming years and teaching your friends to hate Liberal Party, teaching your family, explaining to your dad who watches Sky News or whatever, fuck the Liberal Party, like that’s what we need to do as like the kind of Spearhead of the Right-wing.

 

We need to disabuse people of the Liberal Party and we need to punish them and destroy them so that they can never occupy. We need to destroy the dichotomy, the red team, Blue team, Uni-party dichotomy. You need to completely undermine them structurally so that we can create space on the Right-wing for a real actual functional Right-wing.

 

And that might mean one election cycle of pain, but that’s already where the mood of the people is. They’re going to lose the election precisely because of this. They’re going to lose votes to the Right, like I said, and they’re going to continue losing votes to the Right. And our job the memes and ideas that are kind of prominent on Right-wing Twitter now are going to bleed down into the general voter base over the next few years.

 

[1:07:57]

 

So if we all push hard on the kind of fuck the Liberals position over the next few years, it will bleed down. And by the time we get to 2028, the Right-wing minor party vote could be 25%, could be 30%. And a lot of these people could be elected maybe even in the lower house and we could have way more Senators. We could really start to have a kind of dynamic, you know, shift in Australian politics.

 

Look in European countries where the Reform Party is now polling above the conservative Party in Britain. And the Reform Party have their issues, but they’re clearly to the right of the conservatives on a lot of issues. And look at like places like Germany. The Alternative for Deutschland is like number one party in Germany now. They have re-migration in their party platform. They’ve got the Freedom Party in Austria polling, they’re the most popular party in Austria. They’re borderline ethno-nationalists, ultra conservative. You’ve got rise in Right-wing minor parties all across the European political system, in France and in Sweden, many countries.

 

So we should seek to emulate that and destroy the conservatives because the kind of the centre Right conservative Party, they kind of hold the stability in a status quo. They, the Liberals kind of ensure that this kind of basically there’s no real opposition to the agenda. So whenever the Left push on a new issue, the conservatives, Liberals, they always basically, they provide a very weak resistance and capitulate on the core message or the core points. And we’ve seen that time and time again. We can’t allow that to just kind of perpetuate itself in our political system. We have to actually demand a contest where it’s like a full on Right-wing versus Left-wing, like serious policy differences. Not like oh we want to cut this tax instead of that tax or this excise instead of this kind of tax cut and all this kind of shit that they debate about. That’s fucked! Like if that’s what our political debate is, you might as well not even care. Like the whole thing is we don’t really have a real say, or a real direction.

 

Host: I saw an interesting piece of commentary the other day and we’ll end it shortly.

 

The fact that Peter Dutton has kept on calling on John Howard either in commentary or literally physically dragging his carcass out to try to galvanise support. Like he doesn’t realise that people, one, there’s a majority younger voters than non-younger voters that he needs to win over. And two, the younger voters, like even myself I was a bloody probably like what, maybe 4, 5, 6 years old when he was prime minister. Not even like maybe, yeah, three, four years old, something like that. I was born in 92.

 

But what I’m, what I want to get at is that we just don’t care about these old dragged out, you know, politicians that they think that are gonna, we’re gonna say oh yeah, because John Howard supports you and because you bring it up and talking points all the time. Yep, you’ve got my vote. I mean I feel like they really need to adapt or perish. And right now they’re gonna perish.

 

But yeah, it’s a shame that it’s gone this way. But I agree on that. If anything, I agree that it’s time for them to perish. It’s time for them to be punished for all of their sins and it’s time to galvanise and bring up a new strong Right-wing that is responsive to our grievances, that are actually, that actually resonate with the younger demographic and that aren’t going to be scared to give in to the bullshit, that I just pulled up before from Albo saying because you’ve got an opinion on having women in the army or because you think that the Illuminati might be responsible for certain things in history that you can’t have an opinion and you should be punished for it and kicked out from candidacy opportunities. I think that those days are all over now. I think that we need to punish them.

 

And I think it’s adapt or perish and I think it’s time for them to perish. And we are the Spearheads of that. Everyone that follows myself, everyone that follows you guys and the wider community, I think it’s a matter of time. It’s not a matter of if or when. It’s a matter of when, not if. For this to come to a head.

 

But what I want to end on is we’ve got what, a few days before the election. Is there anything that you want to plug to let everyone know where you guys are because you guys got kicked off X? I know you guys trying to appeal that, but where can everyone find you for at least the time being?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I don’t think we’re getting back on X anytime soon because there was clearly some high level government order to ban all of us at once from I don’t even know who, what department. Our Freedom of Information requests. It wasn’t Esafety. I got my Freedom of Information request back from them. They have no records pertaining to my banning. They had records pertaining to taking other tweets down and stuff, but not actually the banning. So it’s higher than them. Could be Department of Home affairs, could be the Prime Minister himself. Could be ASIO, could be them asking their friends in the CIA or the Mossad to get rid of us. Who knows?

 

But the point is we’re not going to be back anytime soon. But yeah.

 

So you can find me on Telegram. The handle is JoelDavistion X on Telegram. And you can watch the show that I do with Blair every usually Thursday night, sometimes Friday nights on Rumble. Rumble.com slash Joel Davis. I’m also on Odysee. Odysee.com Joel Davis. You can find me on Odysee. But Rumble is probably better. So follow me on Rumble, follow me on Telegram. Keep up to date with what we’re doing. Even if you think maybe I’m a little bit too extreme, it’s still interesting. I think the stuff that I put out is still interesting. You should still take it into consideration. It seems like a lot of the ideas that I put out lately have been taken into consideration by more moderate figures.

 

Actually, I’ve seen the influence bleed down like Trumpeter Patriots seem to have stolen a few of my talking points, which I am happy to see. You know, I wish Clive could have reached out at the beginning and maybe like swung me some of those sweet Clive bucks. I could have helped advise them get more votes than what they’re probably going to get.

 

[1:14:22]

 

Host: But you said something along the lines of instead of spending like 70 million or whatever the number was, just give me one of those and I could have done the whole campaign for you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they probably got like three times as many votes, but you know, 70 million. I saw John McGowan talking about this on a podcast. He said let one of his buddies crunch the numbers and you could buy a controlling stake in Channel 7 for about 70 to 100 million. Which is about what Clive has spent on just this election cycle and all these advertisements he’s taken out everywhere. Clive, just buy Channel 7! And turn Channel 7 into a Right-wing network! Put like replace Kochi with Ralph Babet or something. Give me a show on there and that’s the next election. We will absolutely destroy! Like Trumpeter Patriots or United Australia Party, whatever it is you guys will slap and you can put as many ads on as you want for free because you’ll own the Network. Buy Channel 7 or buy Channel 9 or buy One of these big channels. Clive, stop wasting all this money!

 

Yeah, let’s have some actual Right-wing media. Sky jews is not real Right-wing media. It’s a joke! So I’m poor Clive, like you know, invest that money more wisely, dude. Like you could get way further if you played it a bit more intelligently.

 

But yeah, reach out if you want. Clive, if you’re watching I can give you some ideas.

 

But yeah, yeah, follow me on Telegram, follow me on Rumble. And yeah, put the Liberals last. You can read if you go on The Noticer. Noticer dot News, best news site in Australia by far. They’ve been attacking it lately. But it’s only emboldened the support the readership is flying for The Noticer. Best news journalism. That’s another thing by the way, Clive, you could swing them some cash, they could take you pretty far.

 

But yeah, I put, I published it or the notice. I published an opinion piece of mine called “put liberals last this election” a couple weeks ago. It caused some controversy. Some people said:

 

“Oh, what, so you’re going to tell me to vote Greens above Liberals? Are you going to try and get labour re-elected?”

 

They accused me of being a Labor Party shill. I was accused of being a Liberal Party shill a few weeks ago. Now apparently I’m a Labor Party shill. I’m not a shill for either of these groups. I hate both of these parties.

 

What I’m saying is I make the case in that article. You can find it put the Liberals last this election. Here it is. Go find that article, give it a read.

 

And I think I lay out a pretty compelling case that like in a preferential voting system, it’s not just about who you put first, it’s also about who you put last, because your votes gets recycled and assigned to other parties until you run out of preferences. So yeah, deprive these traitors of your support.

 

And yeah, we need to polarise this system. Liberals are the party of Boomers. Young people aren’t voting Liberal. Immigrants vote Labor. So Labor is the party of immigrants. Young Whites in the inner cities, young Lefties, they’re all voting Greens now. Young Whites who are not Lefties need to start voting for the Right-wing minor parties and punishing the Liberals and let them die with the Boomers.

 

And then we can have a real political system where it’s like the actual Left versus the actual Right and get rid of, just empty the centre. That’s the direction we got to go in if we want real political change.

 

So yeah, check that out. Follow noticer.news if you’re not already. It’s not my site. I’m not involved with it. They publish my opinion pieces sometimes but I’ve supported it, because they do great work! But they’re fully independent. There’s like some fake news going around that they’re like a front of the NSN. It’s not true. They are fully independent.

 

Host: I saw an ABC report on it. That was kind of funny.

 

Joel Davis: But what they said in the news was such bullshit! The WhiteAustralia.org is our new website where you can sign up to be a supporter, or a member. And they said:

 

“Oh, they’re using the same hosting service on WhiteAustralia.org as they’re using on Noticer News.”

 

But it’s like literally one of the three top Internet hosting providers that millions of websites use. So what does that prove? It’s like, oh what, we both used Amazon hosting, therefore we’re the same people. Like it’s ridiculous!

 

[1:18:37]

 

Host: Yeah, this is the article here. This was from a couple weeks ago. And you know, as much as people say that they hate what you guys stand for you guys at the forefront of so many of these talking points and you guys have been have become the test case for all these laws and I think it’s more interesting to me that you guys are the test case for all these things that we are concerned about. And you know, it is what it is if it was anybody else I’d speak to them as well.

 

But it’s you guys. So it lands on. It lands where the National Socialist Network sits. But good chat man. I think this was thoroughly entertaining for everyone that joined us. Thank you to everyone that joined us. We had probably about a thousand people that’s watched us, a couple hundred on Rumble as well. Just want to say thank you to self sufficient Scotsman for the 10 Superchat and yeah, hopefully we get a good result at the election. I guess we’ll all have to wait and see on Saturday. Thanks for the chat Joel. Appreciate your time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, thanks for having me on and, …

 

Host: Thank you to everyone that’s watching as well. Please make sure to share the stream out so everyone can watch it a bit later as well and give us a subscribe on Rumble and follow us on X as well as well because putting out a lot of clips over the next four or five days from the election. I’m sure there’s going to be some more dumb that Albo and Dutton says. So I’ll be at the forefront of keeping you guys updated on that stuff. Take care everybody.

 

[1:20:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/29/2025 = 3)

Plaiedian
9 hours ago
Don’t forget people are confronting albo about his 200,000 sustainable immigration policy.
0 likes
Report

fdgrdfg
5 hours ago
Awesome. Would be awesome to invite Handsome Truth from USA also
0 likes
Report

OopsGotcha
5 hours ago
Jews are the problem.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, we are live. It is Anzac Day, eve, 24th of April, 2024 [2025]. And a stream for you this evening, a regular Thursday night stream. But we’re going to talk a bit about history tonight. We’re going to talk a bit about the history of our great nation, because that’s what we should all be thinking about and preparing ourselves to be focusing upon tomorrow morning when all of you, all of you better be getting up early, before the crack of dawn and getting down to a Dawn Service, whether it be in the city, whether it be your local Dawn Service! One day a year to get out of bed early and get down there and remember and venerate our fallen ancestors who paid the ultimate sacrifice to secure this continent for the White men! Let their sacrifice not be in vain. But it starts with venerating the ancestors in the here and now, if we’re ever going to ensure that. But we’re going to get into that.

 

But first, my esteemed colleague, Blair Cottrell. He’s looking a bit like a rock star from the early 90s. I just hope that he hasn’t gone on heroin or something. He’s looking a little bit heroin chic. I mean, not skinny heroin chic, but the sunglasses on at night, so it’s a good look though, it’s fresh!

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t usually do this, but a couple of days ago I noticed my eye was irritated. Didn’t think much of it. Then it got worse and then it got worse. And now it looks like this. See that? [take sunnies off] I saw a doctor and apparently it’s some sort of cellulitis of the skin in the eyelid, which is a relatively serious infection. I don’t know how I got it. I don’t remember being bitten by anything. Maybe I just got unlucky somehow.

 

So taking antibiotics, unfortunately. I don’t like to take antibiotics, but there’s some circumstances where it’s necessary to take antibiotics. I know that I’ve had deep tissue infections on a couple of occasions. Really, if not for modern medicine, I would probably be dead because an infection would have got me by now. And I was told that an infection like this, if gone untreated, can actually cause permanent blindness. So thank God that modern medicine exists. Not everything about modernity is bad, I guess. But I’ll be wearing the sunglasses for the rest of the stream because it just looks terrible. I’m not really confident about being on camera with an eye like that, so you’ll have to enjoy the Sunnies, guys. I’m not on cocaine! I haven’t spiralled out of control. Still here. I’m still me.

 

Joel Davis: That was a nice cope story, but, I mean, we all know that Blair’s missus packs a punch. And you know, when you talk back, you better watch out!

 

So we’re feeling for you, Blair, and just remember that you can get help. There is a domestic violence hotline.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not for man! There’s no help for men, bro! Everyone knows it. Even the lawyers know it. You go into court for a domestic violence dispute and you’re a man, you have no rights! [chuckling] Everyone knows that. So why lie?

 

Come on, let’s be honest here!

 

Joel Davis: Anyways, so I guess let’s get into the show. I’m going to try and do this show in a streamlined fashion this evening because we’ve got to get up early in the morning to get down to the Dawn Service. Which I reiterate, if you don’t get up early tomorrow morning and go down to the Dawn Services – this is for the Australians in the audience – and I think in New Zealand, do Anzac Day in New Zealand the same as us? [It’s the same day] I presume that they do.

 

Blair Cottrell: Almost certainly! It stands for Australian, New Zealand Army Corps, so almost certainly they would do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I presume that they do. I don’t know if they have a different day. I don’t know enough. Maybe if you’re a Kiwi, maybe you could let us know what you do over there.

 

But if you’re an Aussie, you better be out of bed 5am and you better be down at that Dawn Service! Because think about what they did for us and all you have to do is get out of bed early one day a year. It’s really not that much to ask.

 

But yeah, I want to talk about history tonight and I want to talk about what the Anzacs actually fought for. Because there’s a lot of misrepresentation that occurs at this time of year.

 

On Australia Day, the enemy is willing to openly admit that this country was founded by the White man for the White man and condemn it as such, and go on about colonialism and the poor abos and blah, blah, blah, as we’re all familiar with. But on Anzac Day, they take a different approach, tack. Because they know if they were going to on the sacrifices of the ancestors at wartime that that wouldn’t go down with the population. We are not that demoralised. You know, they’re barely, they can’t even really cancel Australia Day effectively. We talked about that on Australia Day, how Australia Day is having a resurgence in popularity precisely because of the attacks being levelled by our political enemies upon that day.

 

But on Anzac Day, they try to subvert it. They try to present the Anzacs:

 

“They fought for multiculturalism, they fought for against fascism and communism, for freedom. And all this kind of stuff.”

 

But it’s bullshit! It’s bullshit! If you know anything about history, it’s bullshit!

 

And what the Anzacs fought for in World War I, because it’s only really proper to talk about the Anzacs in the First World War, because in the other World Wars we were fighting more as Australia, or in World War II we were fighting as Australians, and in Korea and Vietnam and so on, we were fighting as Australians. But in World War I they were fighting for a White Australia, and in World War II they were fighting for a White Australia. And these are really the decisive wars that everyone is really thinking about.

 

[06:10]

 

And even in these wars against Korea and Vietnam, against communism, they were fighting to preserve a White Australia. We still had the White Australia Policy, and they were trying to put up a defence against the spread of communism in our region.

 

So the men that died in these wars, whether you agree with the overarching politics of these wars, which obviously there’s a lot to discuss in that regard, that’s what they were fighting for! And they said it explicitly. And when it comes to World War I and World War II, the Prime Minister himself said it explicitly! Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister in the First World War, when he addressed the nation and he was basically asking people to sign up to go and fight, he said:

 

“I bid thee, go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

He didn’t say:

 

“Go fight for Australia in France!”

 

He didn’t say:

 

“Go fight for the British Empire in France!”

 

He said:

 

“Go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

And that might seem maybe a little bit strange to people. What could he possibly mean by that? Why was White Australia up for, threatened by events in Europe? And there’s a long version of the story, but I’ll start with the shorter version. The basic version is this.

 

Australia at that time, obviously a very young country, but only been federated in 1901. About three years after we federated, the British Empire entered into an alliance with the Japanese. And the Japanese were an emerging power in the Asian region. They started building up a big navy. And the British, which at the time had the best navy in the world, and the best shipbuilders in the world, were actually helping the Japanese to build up their navy. As part of this alliance, the British saw fit to make an alliance with Japan because that would then basically take some of the pressure off them trying to command the seas of East Asia if they were allied with the pre-eminent Asian power. And there was a lot of competition at that time for control in East Asia. The Germans were trying to get established here. You had the French, I’m talking about East Asia or the East in general. The French and other European powers were involved, and the British wanted to maintain dominance.

 

So there was an alliance with Japan. It was widely criticised, but it was ultimately in Australia because of the basically the fear that it would force us to cuck on the White Australia Policy. Because the Japanese did not appreciate the White Australia Policy. They said:

 

“How dare you lump us in with blacks and Indians and these lesser races. We are Japanese, we’re a proud race, we shouldn’t be excluded from immigration to Australia on the account of being an inferior race.”

 

And the response at the time, actually by Deakin, who was a founding father of our country and Prime Minister, second Prime Minister of Australia, was to say that:

 

“Oh, we don’t want you here precisely because we respect you as a race, precisely because we think if we were to let you in, you could take over.”

 

But anyway, we obviously secured the White Australia Policy, but the British made us kind of tone it down basically not to offend the sensibilities of the Japanese. And so there was a resentment on that basis and a fear of Japanese expansion.

 

And then in 1905, the Japanese did what at that time was unthinkable. They defeated a European power in a war. They went to war with Russia and they defeated Russia in 1905! And that shocked the world. It was the first time a non-White country had defeated a White country in a war in all of modern history. And so that sent shockwaves through the world that, well, perhaps the White man won’t just be able to rule the world carte blanche with no resistance.

 

So this struck fear into the hearts of Australians in general because the idea was, well, the Japanese turns expansionist power. A few years later, they conquered Korea. Fears increased.

 

Now, of course, the British Empire had a formal alliance with Japan. But they said:

 

“Well, what happens if the British Empire collapses? Or what happens if that alliance collapses and instead the Japanese ally with the Germans and then they come together to defeat the British Empire, then what will happen to Australia?”

 

The fear was that if the British Empire was to lose its dominance in the region, that we would ultimately fall under the control of these powers and then potentially non-Whites would be able to enter our continent, and the White Australia Policy would collapse.

 

And so all the rhetoric and all of the political machinations at that time was building a defence force in Australia that could defend Australia, but also propping up the British Empire because Australia had such a small population so that the British Empire could defend Australia and therefore defend a White Australia. Because if we were to fall under the control of some other empire, they could force us to open our borders and bring in their merchants and bring in their workers and so on and we would lose the continent to other races, literally. And this was explicitly, I’m not just saying this is what all the newspapers were saying. This is what all the politicians were saying. This was our primary concern politically in this country at the beginning of our history.

 

And there were a lot of elements in Australian politics, particularly in the Labor Party at the time, who were upset at the British Empire, who thought that the British Empire, you know, was basically taken over by jews, bankers and so on. They didn’t give a fuck about Australia. That they had this kind of multiracial, international corporate empire that was ruled by not the almighty dollar at that time, because it wasn’t the dollar but the almighty pound. And that they weren’t concerned about the racial future of Australia. But nevertheless they recognised that because we were of the British race, we were part of the British Empire, that it was our best bet at securing our position in the world.

 

[12:13]

 

 

And so they were willing to go – I mean, Billy Hughes was Labor, he was a Labor man – they were willing to go and fight for the British Empire to ensure they won the First World War, to ensure that the British Empire remained strong, to ensure that it continued dominating East Asia, to ensure that we could continue having a White Australia Policy. That’s why we got involved in World War I. It wasn’t just because of some kind of like British patriotism or loyalty to the Empire. It was a pragmatic decision to secure a White Australia.

 

Of course, people felt good feelings towards the British Empire. We were of the British race, of the British stock. But there was also a strong sense of nationalism in Australia all the way back at that time, a keen sense of what was in our interest as a people.

 

And so that was what was determined that we have to go and fight to secure the future of the British Empire and also to win the Right by participating in that war to have a say about the direction of the Empire. And what Billy Hughes did at The Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I and the during the establishment of the League of Nations, is he pushed very hard against members of the alliance, such as the Japanese and others who wanted to push for, … League of Nations, by the way, was the prototype of the UN. It was the first attempt at creating a UN. And there was a proposal put forward by the Allies that won World War I to establish this prototype of the UN called the League of Nations, to basically establish a principle that racially discriminatory immigration policies would be abolished basically in the world. That this was horrible and racist and so on all the way back then. And Billy Hughes pushed very hard against that. He said:

 

“We came in, we had 65,000 men sacrifice their lives to ensure this victory. We are not giving up our White Australia Policy.”

 

And we successfully won. We convinced the Americans sided with us, the British sided with us and ultimately that provision was taken out. The Japs weren’t happy about it, but they didn’t have enough sway. So Billy Hughes came back to Australia announcing victory:

 

“What a great victory that we’d achieved!”

 

And also New Guinea, today known as Papua New Guinea, was under German control. And this caused a lot of concerns back in those days. We also secured that under our control at that time.

 

So the idea was not simply about defending the British Empire because we loved the King. And we were Anglo Saxons or something. It was a specific concern with Australian national interests and how to secure this continent for the White man. And everyone knew it! And when the soldiers came back and they formed what became known as the RSL, which is the largest body by far to represent veterans that have fought for Australia and fought for the Empire. They came back to Australia, they set up the RSL [Returned and Services League (of Australia)] and immediately became the strongest lobby group in an already very racist country for the White Australia Policy. With the first president, second president, third president of the RSL and so on, making constant statements that their members fought and died or fought and sacrificed because their members obviously were still alive and their comrades who died for a White Australia to secure basically Anglo supremacy in the world, and to secure this continent for the White man. That’s why they fought. And that any kind of acquiescence on the White Australia Policy they would consider a betrayal. And they reaffirmed this after World War II.

 

And in fact, the RSL was the last major public organisation in Australia to abandon explicit advocacy for the White Australia Policy. It wasn’t until the late 80s, the late 1980s, long after the White Australia Policy was abandoned by the government that the RSL finally abandoned its advocacy for the White Australia Policy.

 

So if you see Anzac Day ceremonies tomorrow, they try to tell you that:

 

“They fought for multiculturalism and against Nazism!”

 

They did fight against the Germans, they did fight against the National Socialists. And they were misguided, you could say, ultimately, and putting their allegiance to the Empire, because the Empire in the Second World War ultimately betrayed us and it collapsed. It betrayed itself and collapsed.

 

But that’s why they fought. That’s what their sacrifice was about. Every single man on that battlefield, that’s what he was fighting for. That’s why he went to France, that’s why he went to Gallipoli, that’s why he went to Kokoda*. So that needs to be held in full consciousness and ruminated upon.

 

[* The Kokoda Track campaign or Kokoda Trail campaign was part of the Pacific War of World War II. The campaign consisted of a series of battles fought between July and November 1942 in what was then the Australian Territory of Papua. It was primarily a land battle, between the Japanese South Seas Detachment under Major General Tomitarō Horii and Australian and Papuan land forces under command of New Guinea Force. The Japanese objective was to seize Port Moresby by an overland advance from the north coast, following the Kokoda Track over the mountains of the Owen Stanley Range, as part of a strategy to isolate Australia from the United States. Wikipedia]

 

[16:53]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s reasonable to assume that every fighting soldier was conscientiously engaging in the war? That whatever it is, they were fighting in World War I, World War II, because they were fighting for White Australia? Every Australian soldier actually was fully aware and conscious of their ethnicity and they were fighting to defend their ethnicity? Or would you say that maybe war propaganda plays a part in the reason for why they’re fighting? They might have been spelled by some series of slogans produced by the government. They might have been made to hate the enemy. They might be in it for glory, for honour. They might just be in it because they’re bored and they want to do something with their lives that’s interesting. I think there’s probably a complex of reasons. I understand what you’re saying. I understand that the Statesmen who were in favour of the war, they obviously had their reasons, which were nationalistic in essence. But I think the individual soldier, he fought for his own reasons a lot of the time.

 

However, it’s my understanding, or it’s my feeling rather, that there was a collective, how should I describe it? Some sort of collective understanding that was unspoken, that the Australians understood that they were a specific ethnic group, that they were a certain type of people, an extension of the British colonies, but still their own kind nonetheless, and that they were fighting to defend their kind, they were engaged in the war for that purpose, collectively.

 

Yet on an individual level, if you were to interview each soldier, if that was possible, for argument’s sake, I’m sure they would give a series of explanations as to why they were fighting.

 

But I think the collective reason why they were fighting would have been in for the maintenance or expansion of their own ethnic presence, power, that kind of thing, defending their own kind I think. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Well at the end of the day though, like these politicians that were talking about these ideas, they were elected, they were running on these ideas. They were saying:

 

“We must defend a White Australia. This is what we need to do to prepare to fight and defend it.”

 

And they were voted into government, you know, according to those statements they were making to the public.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Australians were not forced, Australians were not forced to go and fight. They were not forced. There wasn’t conscription in World War I. They signed up voluntarily to go.

 

Blair Cottrell: What I was saying is, isn’t it curious that the phrase “White Australia” right now would be something that a lot of people wouldn’t be comfortable using in regular conversation because they’ll be accused of racism or something worse. But less than 100 years ago maybe even 50 or 60 years ago, that phrase was just commonly used and understood as an obviously present and correct thing. Like everybody understood that White Australia existed. White Australia was a real cultural, ethnic identity and it was who we are. It’s who we are as a people. In such a short time people are now have been, or people have been made to feel uncomfortable and frightened to even use that phrase. It doesn’t take very long, does it with effective propaganda to turn a people against themselves? To make them too afraid to establish any right to exist, too afraid to fight for their own self-determination.

 

Joel Davis: That phrase White Australia was the central animating concept of federation. It was the central animating concept of World War I. It was a central animating concept of the first half of this federated nation’s existence, in politics. The White Australia Policy was the policy of the government that was most in concern for the people and for the politicians! It was the defining principle of our country. It wasn’t just an idea, it wasn’t just something that people liked or sometimes talked about. It was an obsession!

 

And those men gave their blood. They died for that ideal. Ultimately that was what it was explained to them that the war was about. In all of the, all of the media publications. All these publications that we still know today, like the Sydney Morning Herald and the Melbourne Age and all these things, they used to be virulently White nationalist racist publications. They used to be! They used to talk, like The Noticer today has tamer language than what the Sydney Morning Herald had in like 1910. That’s just the reality and that’s how the culture was in those days.

 

And the so-called Anzac Myth. People talk about that, how there was a the soldiers were described rather poetically by journalists and other writers in the Australian press during and after the First World War. That ANZAC myth was fundamentally racist. It was describing the Australian soldiers essentially as great eugenic specimens, talking about how they were the superior Anglo Saxon and like, comparing them as a stock to the British in favourable terms and so on, and describing how on the battlefield they showed our racial fortitude was superior to the enemy and this kind of thing.

 

And when Australian politicians were justifying certain policies, like policies to make military training compulsory nationally and things like that, they would come to the people and say:

 

“If you are a proud White man, how could you oppose my policy?”

 

You know, they would literally appeal to you on the basis of White nationalism, on the basis of your, like, Aryan honour to justify their policies to you. That’s how politicians used to talk to the people in those days.

 

[22:49]

 

So when you read Australian history, you realise this country was more racist than like even probably any country in the world at that time. And there was this pressing concern. I just posted on my Telegram this quote from Prime Minister Billy Hughes. He was our wartime Prime Minister in the First World War. And Billy Hughes, by the way, was a full on Darwinist, basically. He had a dog-eat-dog, highly racial, like a kind of view of history as racial competition. You either fight for your survival and assert your supremacy or you get crushed by other races. That’s how he saw the world. It was very Hitlerian, proto-Hitlerian, you could say. And in some, in some ways you could say Billy Hughes was more savage than Hitler in some of his statements and speeches on this, on these issues.

 

But this is a quote from Billy Hughes. This is during a ceremony that was conducted in 1913, a year before the beginning of World War I, when they started building Canberra. Because at the beginning of Australia, Canberra wasn’t built yet. At the beginning of Federation, there was a dispute between Sydney and Melbourne as to who got to be the capital.

 

And so the compromise was struck to build the capital city in Canberra for the purpose of serving as the nation’s capital, to kind of assuage this conflict between the two major cities, right? And Billy Hughes said this at this, at the ceremony where the foundational stone of Canberra was being laid. When they started building Canberra, to quote:

 

“We are here so far as we can to mould the destinies of a nation. The deity has fashioned us out for this purpose from the beginning. We were destined to have our own way from the beginning and America, two nations that have always had their way, for they killed everybody to get it. I declare to you that in no other way shall we be able to come to our own except by preparing to hold that which we have. Now, we are here as visible signs of a continent. We have a great future before us. The people are incapable of nourishing abstract ideals. They must have a symbol. And here we have a symbol of nationality. The first historic event in the history of the Commonwealth we are engaged in today without the slightest trace of that race we have banished from the face of the earth (meaning the Aboriginals). We must not be too proud, lest we should too in time disappear.”

 

This is how the leader of our country thought before World War I. You know, tomorrow if they do a Welcome to Country, that wasn’t what they fought for. The man who led us, who led the Anzacs into the First World War, said:

 

“I bid thee go fight for White Australia in France. We have banished the Aboriginals from the face of the earth. Let us struggle so that we are not banished like them.”

 

That was how this man thought. That’s how this man spoke and addressed our nation. That was the man that we elected to rule us, to run us during that war. And who was celebrated as a hero, a national hero at the time.

 

So that’s what we need to have consciousness of around this. Like this is not up for debate. Like it is black and white. The Anzacs fought for a White Australia!

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you ever believe in racial equality at any point in your life?

 

Joel Davis: I think when I was young, growing up, I did kind of have a default egalitarianism of sorts where I thought:

 

“Okay, well, you know, fairness would dictate that every people deserve a certain dignity or whatever.”

 

But I did, as I started to get into my teens, I did become conscious of the fact that there were relations of supremacy and superiority. And I did remember feeling pride from basically the first time I thought about it, in the fact that my race was clearly such a powerful and strong race in world history and in contemporary history that we were all kind of top of the food chain or it felt like we were top of the food chain. And I did also remember becoming conscious of the jews around that time because there was a lot of discussion of Israel and so on we’re talking about this is during like the Iraq war and zionism. And I kind of became vaguely familiar of like conspiracy theories around the Rothschild banking family and so on.

 

And I remember thinking:

 

“Okay, well that kind of puts the whole Holocaust thing in perspective. Like they said that Hitler was trying to take over the world and the guy, the guys he decided to take on were the jews. And apparently these jews run all these banks. And now we’re our whole like global superpowers are fighting to defend their country, Israel. What is that all about?”

 

And so that did make me kind of start to see, … I remember feeling like, okay, maybe that would justify, like I didn’t at that time I didn’t realise the Holocaust was fake, but I started to think:

 

“Okay, maybe that would kind of justify doing something like that if you felt like that was your main competitor for supremacy.”

 

But these were kind of vague thoughts. Like it took me multiple years to kind of formulate them more ideologically because the conditioning is very strong in our culture to think in terms of egalitarianism and that like supremacy is in a certain sense immoral.

 

I just kind of thought about it at that time more as like a kind of, from a realist, pragmatic standpoint, maybe there are necessary evils that you can sympathise with. And you know, in my late teens I became familiar with like Nietzsche’s philosophy and so on and started thinking about things more in those terms. But it probably wasn’t until I was 19 or so that I really fully internalised that as a worldview and came to that like ultimate kind of conclusion of thinking about the world in terms of that like kind of inequality is just nature and it’s just reality. And that either you’re the top of the chain or you eat shit! And it’s much better to be top of the chain than to be eating shit!

 

[29:01]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I remember I used to get angry at people for being racist, like in primary school and early high school days.

 

And I thought that was a good thing for me to do because I was standing up for what was right, what was fair. Because as you said, the conditioning was strong. That’s what I had been conditioned to believe was right. But I started to see the obvious realities of racial differences and even genetic differences between people of the same race. And I realised that people aren’t equal. I realised that pretty quickly.

 

But one thing that always, because I went through, so I’m just getting a message from someone. I went through a stage where I actually felt like White people didn’t have culture. I felt like only dark skinned people were cultured. And White people just didn’t really have anything like that. Because I wasn’t thinking about what culture was. I didn’t have a good understanding of culture. To me, culture meant music and family values and doing things together as a family and painting your face and having all of these kind of spiritual, greater meanings to family traditions and shit like that!

 

I didn’t see culture as great stone structures. I didn’t see the kind of culture produced by the race to whom I belonged. And I can recall, I always was curious about the Nazis, because whenever I saw footage of the Nazis, the Germans, on History Channel, I heard how crazy and evil they were, yet so many people followed them! And they looked so polished, they look so good!

 

And so the explanation didn’t really match the aesthetic that was being presented to me on these channels. So I was always curious to learn more about the Nazis. But whenever I tried to, there wasn’t really a lot of information there. It was just like, these guys are evil, these guys are crazy! Especially if you tried to get your information from Hollywood entertainment you weren’t really getting much there.

 

Joel Davis: Well, let’s talk about World War II, actually, because obviously on Anzac Day, we don’t just venerate people from the First World War, but also the Second World War. And I think that’s important because people say:

 

“Well, you know, Joel, you’re a National Socialist, you’re obviously sympathetic towards the Germans, yet you’re venerating men who fought many of them against Germans, a lot of them against the Japanese, who were German allies in the Second World War. And ultimately you think the Second World War was a horrible thing, the way that it went and that the Germans lost and so on.”

 

And that requires an explanation, perhaps, and we’ve talked about it before, but I think on a day like this, it’s important to discuss this.

 

Number one, recall what I was saying about World War I. The animating concern of the First World War for Australians was the Japanese. And the Japanese weren’t even our enemy during World War I. They were our ally. But we saw that the Japanese would expand and become an increasingly powerful force in the world. And that was why we chose to ally ourselves with the British. Well, we were already in the British Empire, but why we chose to commit so intensely to the British Empire to the point that we sent 65,000 of our own sons to go and die for the Empire in the First World War, in the beaches of Turkey and in the trenches of France.

 

And the Second World War vindicated these fears. Right? Because what was the Second World War? Well, the Second World War, it started in Europe, in 1939, but arguably it started in Asia in 1933 when the Japanese invaded China. And the Japanese were rampaging their way through China, through the 1930s. And this was setting off massive alarm bells in Australia. And ultimately, of course, the Japanese ended up forging an alliance with the Germans.

 

And so this very much factored into our enthusiasm to fight in the Second World War, our concern that if, well, if the British Empire was defeated in the Second World War, which ultimately it was, we can get on to that, but it was defeated by the Germans in the Second World War, that basically we would be left defenceless against this radically expansionary Japanese Empire that was allied with what would have been the German victors. That concern is what inspired men to fight.

 

And ultimately, from a bird’s eye view, it was incorrect for us to fight against the Germans. The betrayal happened really in London. The British should never have gone to war with the Germans. The Germans wanted an alliance with the British. And then even after the war began, they also wanted to make peace with Britain and were rejected many, many times.

 

And that ultimately was destructive to the British Empire. The ultimate victors of World War II was not Britain. On paper, it was Britain, but it wasn’t. On paper it says that they won, but look at the practicalities of what happened. The British Empire fell apart immediately after World War II at the hands of the Americans and the Soviets, their so-called allies, during World War II. During World War II, the Americans extended massive loans to the British which they made them repay in full. They extended massive loans to the Soviet Union, their supposed communist enemy in the Cold War. They didn’t make them repay, they didn’t make them pay back one cent in order to fight the Germans.

 

There was an intent by the Americans to use the conditions of World War II and kind of World War I as well, actually, to an extent, but in particular World War II, to basically bankrupt and break up the British Empire and then integrate its remnants into an American led, liberal, democratic international order.

 

Now moving over to the Pacific, the Japanese were a real threat. They did want to take over our region. I don’t think they wanted to invade Australia directly, but they did attack us. They did bomb Darwin, they did send [mini] submarines into Sydney, they did invade Papua New Guinea, or New Guinea, which was actually our protectorate. So they did attack us. And they also attacked the British Empire and Australian soldiers in Singapore and other places.

 

[35:27]

 

 

So what World War II was primarily for Australians was a race war against Japan to ensure the dominance of the White race over the Asia Pacific region. And ultimately our main ally, and that was the Americans, was the British Empire didn’t have the capacity to defend us. They basically abandoned us in World War II. And we kind of abandoned them largely earlier on in the war. In the early years of the war we went and fought the Germans and the Italians in North Africa on behalf of the British Empire.

 

But then once the war with Japan kind of began, we pulled our guys out, we said:

 

“No, we need to bring them home to defend Australia.”

 

We basically pulled out of the European theatre of the World War and stop really participating in it, brought all the guys back home and just focused on fighting Japan for the rest of the war. We weren’t really involved in the ultimate defeat of the Germans.

 

So that needs to be also kind of taken into consideration. When we’re venerating our ancestors, we’re venerating mostly from World War II, our ancestors who fought a race war against the Japanese which was a valid race war and a necessary race war in order to preserve our sovereignty. Unfortunately because of basically the traitorous government in Britain which made decisions to the benefit of their jewish financier backers rather than the British Empire itself, they refused peace with Hitler, they refused alliance with Hitler which would have been in their actual geopolitical interest in order to essentially be complicit in the defeat of all European empires including themselves by the communists from the east and the American, like liberals, from across the pond.

 

And so the British Empire was no more. And now Australia was left even though the Japanese were defeated, we were now left basically dependent upon an American led international order. Basically became part of an American Empire rather than a British Empire.

 

And due to being part of that American Empire we became infected with all of the ideas that ultimately destroyed and unravelled the White Australia Policy and kind of sent our country on the trajectory that it’s now on today, one of suicidal self destruction!

 

And the same thing happened to all of America’s so-called allies in Western Europe. Their so-called allies in Western Europe also have gone on this suicidal trajectory of self destruction as is America itself because it’s ruled by a kind of anti-White jewish oligarchy.

 

So World War II in that sense was a mistake. But at the time America seemed like at that time America was a 90% White country. An America that had millions of members in the Ku Klux Klan, who had a racial restrictive immigration policy, who had segregation in the south, because obviously they had black [post —] slave populations, but they had segregation. No one at that time could have foreseen the trajectory that America was on, except maybe like, a few really philosophically wise individuals. But the average person and the average statesman could not have foreseen what would come of America.

 

And so the decisions that were made at that time by our leadership and the feelings and sentiments of the people and the soldiers at that time, I think, were fundamentally noble and virtuous. These people were not traitors. John Curtin, our prime minister in World War II, he was not a traitor! I think he was sincere, sincerely trying to take the steps that he needed to defend White Australia. And ultimately, when the war with Japan began, he pulled everyone out, all the Aussies, out of the European and African theatre and said:

 

“You got to get back here and fight to defend White Australia here right now and mobilise the whole country to fight Japan.”

 

And we emerged victorious with many great military victories over the Japanese, particularly Kokoda, which was particularly impressive. So that’s worthy of remembrance and veneration. Absolutely!

 

What do you think about that, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: God, I don’t know. Which part?

 

Joel Davis: Well, World War II in general. Because obviously you share my sympathies towards the Germans under National Socialism, but at the same time, you’ll be remembering our ancestors. I think you have ancestors who served in World War II? I do.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not exactly sure.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

[40:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: As I was saying before, though, I was getting at something. I was saying that, yeah, I felt White people didn’t have a culture, but I was always curious about the Nazis. And I started to learn more about National Socialism by reading Mein Kampf. And I learnt a lot about it. And I had to tell everybody! I had this girlfriend, right? And I wouldn’t shut up! I kept talking about the point of life basically being about breeding up, about enhancing your genetic stock and not degrading it through miscegenation or just genetic downgrading. And we talked a lot about that. I chewed her head off about it a lot. And sometime later, she said to me:

 

“Look, I agree with you and I understand what you’re saying, and I’m glad that you have taught me about alternative World War II history. I’m glad that we discussed the reality of race and the point of life, as you call it.”

 

But she said:

 

“I was happier before.”

 

She said to me:

 

“I wish you didn’t tell me these things because I was happier before.”

 

She said:

 

“Now I feel like I can see a giant elephant in the room now. I feel like I’m surrounded by retards, like dysgenic retards, and it’s depressing!”

 

Yeah? And we parted ways a short time later and I never spoke to her again.

 

So this is a regular person, a person who’s intelligent enough, a member of Australian society, to understand the reality of race and how important it is not to throw away what you have genetically, ethnically.

 

But then when she came to understand that, she just acknowledged to me, admitted openly that she was happier before she knew that! The society she grew up in basically pushed the opposite message, and that she felt like an outcast. She felt like she wished she hadn’t been told that. She wished she never had to understand that, because it was depressing for her.

 

Do you think the average person. This is like the question that I’m getting to. Do you think the average person can be a National Socialist? Do you think they’re capable of enduring what they have to endure? Do you think they need to be a National Socialist in order to vote for a party that represents those ideals? Because I don’t feel they are capable. I don’t feel they have the strength.

 

I feel like a small leadership group has the strength, but the ordinary people, the masses, they’re neither capable nor willing to be ethnic nationalists. Has there ever been a time in history where the entire country, any country, has been consciously ethnically nationalist, every single member? Or have they just been more concerned about their own personal lives and misgivings? Are they actually geared to participate in politics and philosophy on the level of being a conscious ethnic nationalist? Do they need to be? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, obviously Australia in the first half of the 20th century was a consciously ethnically nationalist people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Was it, though? Was it, though? Was it, though? Because you go through old footage, there’s old ABC footage, and it’s from like the 60s or something, I think. And even then you’ve got people saying:

 

“Oh, I’ve got nothing against this race and that race. And a few of them can come in. That’s okay, as long as they’re not intermarrying.”

 

Joel Davis: That’s in the sixties. So things are starting to change. The television was introduced and the kind of post World War II judeo-American propaganda started getting disseminated and so on, and the culture had shifted quite significantly at that point.

 

But in the early 20th century I think the culture was very staunchly racialist. The media, the clear political will of the people as represented by who they were voting for and what kind of policies were convincing to the Australian people.

 

And also the lead up to the Federation of Australia, the Labor movement in this country the political movements in this country in general all geared towards racial preservation. And labour movement was engaged in a lot of industrial action that was basically geared against the use of coloured labour and so on. The public overwhelmingly supported them. When you had kind of race riots and so on, … Because like look at for example the Eureka Stockade*. The Eureka Stockade was essentially like an armed rebellion against the government at the time. The leaders of the Eureka Stockade ultimately were not thrown in prison, they were basically given a slap on the wrist.

 

[* The Eureka Rebellion was a series of events involving gold miners who revolted against the British administration of the colony of Victoria, Australia, during the Victorian gold rush. It culminated in the Battle of the Eureka Stockade, which took place on 3 December 1854 at Ballarat between the rebels and the colonial forces of Australia. The fighting resulted in an official total of 27 deaths and many injuries, the majority of casualties being rebels. Wikipedia]

 

And then a whole bunch of them entered politics and got elected into the Parliament and one of them became the Premier of Victoria and then they passed a whole bunch of legislation greatly restricting immigration into the colony of Victoria at the time.

 

So the people rallied around violent rebels that were opposing the importation of Chinese labour basically. And these policies were also wildly, wildly popular in New South Wales and Queensland, all the other colonies where they experienced non-White immigration.

 

And then that was the fuel that led to Federation, that was the fuel that led to World War I etc. And the enthusiasm that the people had for these things. When the “Great White Fleet” they called it, which was the American Navy came and toured Australia and visited in a kind of friendly way in 1908 it was greeted by massive crowds. They’re basically described like there’s never been crowds that big in Sydney or Melbourne before to come and see these great ships of the US Navy and then all the speeches that were being given as:

 

“Look at this great White power from the other side of the Pacific Ocean! Look how exceptional their big ships are. We need to be allied with these, with our kind of Anglo Saxon brothers from across the Pacific against you know, the yellow menace! And what proud, what great White men these people are and what testament to area ingenuity, these great feats of technology are!”

 

And people were ecstatic about this and it was like a big deal.

 

[* Great White Fleet – On 20 August 1908 a round the world peace mission by the American fleet arrived in Port Jackson, Sydney. The US navy was on a round the world cruise which had set out eight months earlier on 16 December 1907. The sixteen warships, led by the flagship Connecticut, were painted white to denote peace. They would be known as The Great White Fleet. https://mhnsw.au › stories › general › great-white-fleet]

 

 

 

 

Can you imagine people acting like that today? No, it was a completely different world back then. When they opened the shrine, …

 

[46:49]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do we still have people or do we just have pre-programmed goyim? Is that the problem? Well, think about it. That’s a serious question. The people as thinking, feeling, independent creatures as they were pre-television. Do we still have people like that? Do they still exist? Or are they just morons out there waiting to be told what to do and how to vote? And do we need to adjust ourselves to the receptivity of the moron in order to make any sort of political success? Or are we counting on a people support from a people that are no longer there?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the television definitely radically degraded the consciousness of the masses. I think you can see a massive shift when the television is invented and widely disseminated in the politics of every Western country. And what comes with that you get second wave feminism, you get mass immigration, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s even worse! It’s worse. It’s not just television. Have you, like, Zoomers can’t write. Zoomers cannot write! Have you seen the handwriting? They can’t count money. Like the screen error has made it even worse! Like new generations are even more retarded! They’re kind of more radical because they’re so desensitised, but they’re still more retarded!

 

So we’re dealing with a different type of humanity than the sort of humanity that accepted ethnic nationalism as self evident. We’re dealing with a completely different type of humanity.

 

And so I’m not sure whether ethnic nationalism will fly on a large scale. I think Aussie pride might fly or something really simplistic. And you as the leading force, can be an ethnic nationalist organisation with your own extensive philosophy, but the person that you’re trying to appeal to, the sort of human you’re trying to appeal to, isn’t actually capable of understanding anything about ethnic nationalism. They’re capable of being racist a little bit. And maybe you could make them feel more confident about being racist, less afraid of consequences, because that’s what stops them from being racist.

 

At the end of the day, it’s just fear of consequence. If there wasn’t the applicable or necessary fear of consequence out there in society, people would just be as naturally racist as they’ve always been. It’s fear that stops them from doing that. So you could make them feel more comfortable about being racist. But my gut tells me that the average person out there in society isn’t actually capable of giving themselves over to a conscious ethnic nationalism. But I don’t really think they need to be at the same time.

 

Joel Davis: Well, the masses don’t necessarily need to be because the masses largely get led around by, … I mean, the masses aren’t really in support of what the government is currently doing either. Most people don’t agree with pretty much all the major policies of the government. Most people are sick of the woke stuff, they’re sick of the transgenderism. Immigration isn’t popular. The policies of the government are not popular and they’re getting less and less popular through time.

 

And I think as you said, the younger generation, it’s kind of polarising in both directions. But you know, without the television generation, they are a lot less trusting of authority. They’re a lot more kind of open minded to different ideas.

 

And what we’re seeing in Europe or what we’re seeing in America is that the younger generation is actually extremely Right-wing. So like in America, the younger Zoomers are way more Right-wing than even, than any other generation. Like the age bracket between 18 and, 201 is the most Right-wing of like almost any generation in America at the moment. And also the other thing is that racism and nationalism, these aren’t very complex ideas. Black people, not that smart. Black people are intensely loyal to each other politically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but that’s because there’s no consequence for not being loyal to each other.

 

Joel Davis: But that shows that like in principle, like it’s not about the stupidity of the masses or anything, as you said, it’s a social game. So what is going to give White people the confidence to be racist? It’s a real question. It’s not that they’re not capable of racism. It’s actually a natural thing. Or that it wouldn’t be possible.

 

Blair Cottrell: Less consequence.

 

Joel Davis: It’s about how do you inspire them, how do you basically give them a sense of permission, or a sense of inspiration or some kind of how do you attract them to the principles of nationalism and racism? That’s the question. And there is a way to do it. There has to be because it’s inherent.

 

Blair Cottrell: Needs to be something in it for them. They need to benefit from it and not lose. And a result of being racist currently they lose and they lose hard. So if they can benefit from being racist, they’ll do it all day. People are selfish and simple.

 

Joel Davis: We’re not going to be able to get to the point where people can benefit from being racist until we have a critical mass of people that are willing to suffer. Like you don’t need everyone, you don’t need the like 50% plus one to be willing to suffer for it. We do need a much bigger movement that can sustain and grow to a level where you can start to get, where it can start to actually, socially reward its participants more. We have to make racism fun. We have to make it engaging.

 

And that’s part of what we’re trying to do with the organisation. Like one of the ambitions is to have a network of gyms and pubs that we control across all Australian cities where young White people can hang out and have community and enjoy themselves and throw parties and throw events constantly that are fun to attend for our people so that they can have a communal and social basis to participate in the movement. Make the movement fun, make the movement engaging, give them something to be in the movement and then they’re going to actually stay in the movement, participate in the movement.

 

And then on a political level what we’re going to put forward is a whole series of policies that are going to materially make your life a lot better. And the current system is making your life a hell of a lot worse. And it’s only going to get worse and worse! And people are happy to go along with the status quo while there’s a reasonable amount of prosperity and comfort.

 

[53:09]

 

But in 10 years time, you think it’s bad now, it’s not really that bad yet. Wait, in 10, 15 years time it’s going to get really bad! People are going to be more and more open minded to a more radical politics and a more radical solution. Also racism is the only thing that’s actually funny anymore. You know, they used to be able to control the population through really good propaganda.

 

Back in the 80s, the 90s, the quality of Hollywood movies was so high. The quality of, just ZOG slop, music, television, etc., was actually quite high. And so you could just kind of like turn your brain off and just get like sucked into The Matrix of Bread and Circuses so much more easily. The prevailing culture was so much more enjoyable to kind of lose yourself in. It’s no longer the case. They can’t produce good films anymore, they can’t produce good music anymore. They don’t have the same cultural cache or gravitas that they once did.

 

So the ability to kind of prop up the prevailing like Leftist morality is diminishing. Whilst at the same time if we have the fortitude and we have the ambition and the creativity, we have the ability to create a counterculture that can be quite fun and engaging for the younger generation of Whites who are increasingly disaffected and alienated. I do believe there’s a pathway there to making nationalism fun, to making nationalism enjoyable to make, to activating, to making nationalism amenable to people who have selfish rather than simply selfless, romantic reasons to embrace it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I sometimes fear becoming an entertainer, though. I sometimes worry that the content I’m making, the effort that I’m making politically, may just be consumed as entertainment by people sitting on their asses scrolling. They might find it amusing and funny, but then they’re just going to scroll to the next thing and it’s just another 15 to 25 second moment in their lives that they feel amused by. And that’s the only purpose that I’m serving in the lives of ordinary people. That’s very cynical of course. There’s probably greater psychological impacts the content has on people, and that’s why we make it, that’s why we put this sort of stuff out there.

 

But look, I’m especially cranky because I’ve got this eye infection and my whole eye socket’s just throbbing. It’s very painful. So I’m kind of being a cynic tonight. I’m playing devil’s advocate a little bit, so don’t mind me. I’m doing my best not to crack the shits, but Anzac Day tomorrow, we got the Dawn Service in the morning. This is a very significant day for Australians. It’s very special. It’s really helps, or how should I say it, underpins how important ancestral worship is to us. And by us, I don’t just mean Australians, but every member of our race around the world that is related to us in any way, shape or form. That’s if you pay attention.

 

And Tom Sewell was telling me this today, he’s been telling me for a while, ancestral worship, veneration of the ancestors is kind of integral to our traditions as a people. Whatever country you go to that is a majority White, there is a great deal of respect, admiration and even worship of the ancestors that were the precondition for our existence. Now we are here because of them. And on Anzac Day this year, the message I’d like people to take away, or the feeling I’d like people to experience, is how little your life actually means, is how small your life is in the grand scheme of things.

 

The fact that we are mortals and we have to die in quite a short time, but that through our deeds and what we choose to believe in our national community, our race can live forever.

 

And I think that’s the essence of what we’re doing on Anzac Day, when we appreciate the sacrifices that have been made for us in order for us to be here now. Right. We are respecting, venerating, glorifying all of our ancestors that made the greatest sacrifice that serves as the precondition for our presence here now. That’s what Anzac Day means to me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And ancestor veneration is basically the ancient religion of the Aryans. You know, the ancient Aryans, they practised in different ways, but they fundamentally practised a whole series of rites and rituals venerating their previous ancestors. They had kind of Patriarchal, patrilineal cults and the development of the pantheon of pagan gods kind of spun out of ancestor worship as its foundation. So it’s actually kind of an organic form of our native spirituality of our distant ancestors.

 

And when you think about the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne, which is an incredible building that shrine looks kind of like a pagan temple. It has Christian elements in it, but it looks like a pagan temple, you could say. It looks like something out of like ancient Greece or something. And that temple, which is what it is, was built to venerate the ancestors at. Literally it’s called the Shrine of Remembrance by crowdfunding of the veterans of the First World War.

 

So the Anzacs literally Pooled their cash together and built that. It wasn’t built by the government, it was very carefully designed. And that’s where I’m going to be tomorrow, venerating the ancestors. When that was opened in the early 1930s, over 300,000 people attended!

 

Now, let me look up. What was the population of Melbourne? I don’t know exactly what was the population of Melbourne?

 

[59:26]

 

Blair Cottrell: Only about a million. Less than a million.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In 1932. Let’s have a look.

 

1932, yeah. It was a bit less than a million. 950,000. So it’s around a million people. So 300,000 people showed up to the opening of the shrine.

 

So that’s like three out of every ten Melburnians showing up, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they all. I reckon they all had a personal investment in it because the that wasn’t built by the taxpayer, by the government. It was crowdfunded the funds necessary to build the shrine by RSL, I think. And so everyone who attended those 300,000 people were probably all investors. They probably all put money in for it to be built. So it literally is a structure of the people. Like, this is not something the government built, this is something the people put together themselves.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but not just that it’s such an impressive building. It’s such a powerful, potent building. It shows. I mean, a lot of people would have had family members that fought. Almost everyone would have had family members that fought in World War I. A lot of people would have had family members that died in World War I so obviously it was a big deal to them for those reasons. But the big Union Jacks, I’ve seen the picture they have in underneath the shrine of like, the first. I don’t know if it was Remembrance Day or what, the first kind of big kind of opening, ceremonial opening of the shrine. It was a big event, and it was about venerating those who had given their blood for the Empire. That’s how people used to think back then. It was the biggest deal. Nothing was a bigger deal than that.

 

And that was when we had a country that had a robust White Australia Policy. That was when we had a country that was a real country because those were people that were conscious of their mortality, conscious of the fact that anything you have in this world you have to fight for that. Blood is what binds us and that the blood of sacrifice is what makes possible everything that we have. That was the people that understood that. And the people that were conscious of the greatness of our race that had been achieved through many, many victories, many, many glories in battle.

 

And that’s how a great people think. That’s how a noble people think. Now, who thinks like that now? You know, Anzac Day, when I went last year to the shrine, you know, half the faces there were like, Asian tourists and stuff. And there was like this lame speech about how multicultural the army is now and all the women that get to serve in the army now and how great and how diverse it is and how wonderful that is. And all this bullshit from, like, women in pantsuits that don’t have the first idea what the fuck they’re talking about. It’s fucking disgusting and disgraceful! That’s what it’s become. It’s a farce!

 

So if you go tomorrow, have that content in your heart for these scumbags as well that are up there. You’re standing there for your ancestors, but you’re not there for them. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go. Some people don’t go to these things because they’re like:

 

“Oh the politicians and everything get up there and sell this cucked shit!”

 

And then you see like a bunch of pajeet army cadets marching around or something. And you’re not there for them, you’re there for the ancestors. They’re there watching down, looking at us. That’s why you’re there. So contempt for the scum that rule over us now and the desecration of their sacrifice. But you got to stay true to what it was. When we win, Anzac Day is going to be like it used to be again. The people will be inspired again.

 

But, yeah, dwindling numbers, dwindling concern. But one thing you’ll notice, the Dawn Service. At your local Dawn Service, there’ll be a lot of White faces, there won’t be too many immigrant faces because the Indians are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, the fucking Chinese are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, etc., to come down and venerate our ancestors because it’s our ancestors, not theirs. And they’ll try and say things like:

 

“Oh, the Anzacs were a multicultural fighting force because there were like five Chinese guys that went to Gallipoli or something!”

 

It’s fucking bullshit! Those were White men fighting for a White Australia. End of!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d like to see any Welcome to Country or whatever bullshit they try to come up with at the ceremonies shouted down personally, you know. Legally, of course, but you have the right to protest. If you’re at one of these ceremonies, you have the rights to voice your protest if you’re not happy with what’s being said by the official bureaucrats on the microphones. This is still your country, you still have a say. So don’t be scared to make your voice heard tomorrow morning. If they try to pull any bullshit!

 

[1:04:26]

 

Joel Davis: Old mate in the chat said:

 

“If there’s any abo shit at the one I go to, I’m not sure how I’ll react. Like, I mean, marching up to the mic and going off about it! I’ll boo at least! Every year I feel it get more tense.”

 

Yeah, well, if there’s a welcome country, Welcome to Country tomorrow and whatever service you’re at, boo that fucking shit! And hopefully the people around you start booing.

 

Blair Cottrell: When you take a few mates. If you go with a few people and they agree to sort of echo your sentiments, you know, it can catch on quite quickly. I think I keep cutting out too. Like, sorry, if I’m cutting out my WiFi signals a little bit off.

 

But like I said the if the feeling is there, it should be contagious amongst other people too. I wouldn’t expect too much of ordinary folks because like I said, there have been conditioned by the fear of consequence for voicing any protest against the official social policy of the government and the bureaucracy. But I don’t know, the thing about regular people is they’re fickle, and if they feel enough people are doing something then they’ll join in with it, whatever it is. So, you know. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Exactly.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s just some advice.

 

Joel Davis: Human beings are herd animals. They go along with what everyone around them is doing.

 

And so in the same way that it seems like everyone around you is a cuck, if there are enough nationalists, if there are enough Nazis or whatever, they would be a Nazi, there would be whatever is around them.

 

And so that’s what our political mission is like giving people the licence to express their instincts. Like the instincts are still in there. But few people have the balls, have the self consciousness to move first. We are the first movers. We are the ones that, we are the trailblazers.

 

And then eventually, if enough follow in our wake and we build enough momentum, then we will give the people at large the confidence to finally express what they really feel inside. That has been repressed for decades. And that’s what the mission is, that’s what we’re doing, that’s the objective. But is there anything else you wanted to say about Anzac Day, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Nah. Look, I’m in a lot of pain, so I’m gonna just let you finish up. If you don’t know if you’re tuning in late. I’ve got this like brutal eye infection. Don’t know how it happened. It’s in the eyelid. It’s cellulitis, but only in the eyelid. It’s not actually in the eye socket, which means I won’t lose my vision, but I need to take antibiotics to kill it because it could spread to the eye socket and if it does, that’s bad for me. But I’m just sitting here in a very bad mood and experiencing a lot of pain.

 

So I’m gonna go.

 

Joel Davis: Listen, you can’t, can you react at least to Matt Trihey his, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s gonna cheer me up!

 

I just saw a video of that late. So Matt Trihey is leader of, I think it’s called the National Workers Alliance. He’s been very aggressive and very, very energetic for the last, I’d say 12 to 18 months. Hosting meetings, doing protests. The guy is a true patriot! It’s good to see a real Aussie patriot, salt of the earth, working class builder. Pretty sure he’s a builder too. And he’s out there on the front lines doing what needs to be done. And where was he was at some sort of Teals meeting, wasn’t he? Yes.

 

Joel Davis: So the electorate of Kooyong which is one of the more affluent parts of Melbourne where Toorak and Glen Iris and suburbs like this are located within. Traditionally it’s always been a Liberal seat because it’s a more affluent area. But the last election they voted in a Teal independent by the name of Monique Ryan. And the so-called Teals are a disgusting blend of like the social policies of the Greens mixed with the economic policies of the Liberals.

 

Basically like the most disgusting all mixed together into the most [word unclear] and appeals to rich White women who watch the ABC religiously. It’s like Hillary Clinton basically at the last election in [word unclear] Anyway she had some meeting and they were talking about why we need to give more money to the ABC or some fucking bullshit like that so we can have more communist propaganda more anti-White tax funded communist propaganda pumped out into all these Boomer White women who are the only ones that even fucking [word unclear]. And he confronted them that mass immigration is causing, is exposing our people to increases in crime, rapes, burglaries, violence etc. And then all the Boomer White women at the meeting had a hysterical reaction. One of them even started shrieking. One of these old ladies punched him in the face! [chuckling] But it was on Channel Nine news tonight actually. He made the news so I think he did this stunt. Maybe it was yesterday and then the video went out today. The Noticer posted it. I shared it on Telegram if you want to watch it.

 

But I’m going to play. I haven’t actually seen the clip. I want to see how the news covered it. So it made the news. Let’s see how the news covered it because it’s a pretty interesting story. We’ll watch the news and if they spin it really hard I’ll play the original clip.

 

[Channel 9 news clip]

 

[Reporter] It was meant to be a peaceful community chat until far-Right agitated Matt Trihey loudly barged in and was punched in the face by a woman in the audience.

 

[Dr. Ryan] Fortunately it didn’t really connect. She was much smaller than he was quite a big man.

 

[Reporter] Teal MP Monique Ryan and Labor candidate Clive Crosby shocked by what happened. Dr. Ryan consoled the woman after the incident.

 

[Dr. Ryan] She was sorry that she’d lost control in the way that she did. But she found the whole thing very distressing.

 

[Reporter] Trihey is the leader of the National Workers Alliance. He denies he’s a Neo Nazi, but was once a member of Thomas Sewell’s White nationalist group, the Lads Society.

 

[Rachel Dexter] This individual has been part of groups that are run by neo-Nazis, well publicised Neo Nazis.

 

[Reporter] Tensions have flared across the campaign in the past, 24 hours. Two men charged over separate violent incidents in Sydney.

 

[PM Albanese] There’s no place for violence in our political system. We’re a democracy. It’s important that people engage in a respectful way. That includes people who are candidates, but it includes everyone.

 

[Dr. Ryan] I hope that after this election campaign things will cool down, the temperature will drop a bit, we’ll be able to get back to normal.

 

[Reporter] Whether those inflaming tensions listen is up for debate. Brett McLeod, Nine News.

 

[1:11:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do me a favour. Hang on.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know what just happened to Blair there, but notice how they basically blamed him for some lady punching him in the face. They’re like:

 

“Oh, violence is escalating!”

 

And it’s apparently his fault. They’re victim blaming. Imagine if he went in there and punched someone in the face. It’d be like:

 

“Far-Right, thug beats people up at a meeting!”

 

But if they hit him, … Now, Matt Trihey, by the way, was a professional MMA fighter. He was, he fought in, I don’t think he fought in the UFC, but he fought in, I think Pride. So I think an old lady punching him in the face doesn’t really bother him too much. He’s a pretty tough dude.

 

But yeah, [chuckling] I mean, it’s just kind of ridiculous, the double standard:

 

“Oh, well like we got to give this poor old lady a hug because she sperged out and punched Trihey in the face!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t that weird behaviour! How the aggressor, the person trying to punch someone, who cares if it’s an old lady, she still tried to punch the guy! She’s hugged. She’s hugged and treated like a victim while the actual victim of the assault is like continuously like pushed out of the building as though he’s the cause for concern.

 

I mean, I realise she’s just an old lady and who cares that she punched someone? I don’t care! I’m sure Matt Trihey doesn’t care. It’s not like he’s at home with some ice on that shiner. He’d just be laughing about it. It’s just still very strange behaviour. You know, we’re told so often that it’s never okay to put your hands on anyone. It’s the you’re a dirty, horrible person if you even think about assaulting another human being!

 

But then when some lady does it:

 

“Oh, the poor thing! Let’s give her a hug!”

 

That’s fucking weird, man! What? Obviously I don’t even know how to interpret it, actually. I can’t comment further than it’s just fucking weird!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I can’t be bothered playing the original video. You can go find it on The Noticer. You could find it on my page. I think Tom shared it. I don’t know if you shared it. I think you shared it. So you can go watch it on Telegram or on Twitter.

 

But yeah, like, literally, these women are shrieking. He goes in there. He’s calm. He just starts talking about crime statistics and immigration and asking for an answer.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s all he does. That’s pretty much all he does! All he does is list off crime stats about how many immigrants are actually committing crimes, how many immigrants are committing rape, how much rape has increased in certain states and regions in proportion to the increase in immigration. That’s all he does! All he does is list off facts. He just spits facts, and people lose their minds and are now physically attacking him. How insane is that? How retarded are people? How embarrassing it is to be a member of the same race as people like that? Like, do you ever feel like that, Joel? Do you ever feel like you’re born on the wrong planet or something? It’s like, what the fuck, what’s going on here? Who are these fucking cs?

 

Joel Davis: Why are we letting retarded old ladies participate in politics? Like, shut up, grandma! You’re a retard! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do they even have to participate in politics? I mean, I don’t know. Are they bored? Maybe they feel like they’re making a difference or something.

 

Joel Davis: They are bored. They’re sitting at home watching television all day, and then the news is talking about politics all the time, and they get all hyped up on it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Imagine the story. Imagine the story. Oh, Gladys!

 

Joel Davis: Ingesting so much propaganda. And then someone comes in and says something mean coded.

 

And then they literally start shrieking. One of them was like, fucking shrieking like a banshee! Some old lady punches a man in the face! And they’re trying to drag him out, but he’s like, he’s a strong guy, so he’s just kind of like, whatever. But these old women are trying to drag him out. And then some random, like, soy Jack old dude is like:

 

“How could you do this in here!”

 

Like, just like doing this like weird outrage thing. It’s fucking pathetic! But the reaction on social media was funny. Everyone was kind of just taking the piss out of these retarded Boomers.

 

But then like the news. The news is like, we know about how much bias they have because we play clips of them covering us all the time. You know, they just always frame things in such a ridiculous way.

 

[1:15:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: But I think it’s obvious some craze Leftist attack someone physically. The statement from the relevant statesman, and I think it was from actually Albanese, the Prime Minister himself in this particular instance, is:

 

“Violence from either side it won’t be tolerated!”

 

But then whenever something mean is said by someone on the far-Right, as they call it, the far-Right, well then, it’s always the far-Right that are targeted specifically. And like you’ve got to change laws to stop them offending people. Then you see some actual physical assault or violence and their response is:

 

“Well, both sides need to be careful with what they’re doing.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s so where her outburst was justified because her “feelings” got hurt.

 

But then we get treated, we don’t commit violence, we hurt people’s feelings, therefore we’re the bad guy. And so like:

 

“Women can’t be responsible for the fact that they’re hysterical. It’s obviously the man’s fault because we made them upset. Because female emotions and feelings need to rule over rationality or any other kind of modicum of reasonable, consistent standards for behaviour, that goes out the window because an old lady got upset and started crying and therefore she’s the victim.”

 

And this is what we’re ruled by as a society. I was looking at this study the other day. There was a study that was done, a Meta analysis of basically all forms of literature in the English language. I think they got an AI to assess what’s the prevalence of words that describe rational thought and the prevalence of words that describe emotional predilections, and what’s the ratio. How rational or how emotional is the general language of everything published in the English language. And from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution up to the late 1960s, about 1970, it gets more and more and more rational through time to the point where it’s super majority rational. Then in 1970, after the second wave feminism and women are introduced into the workforce and academia and politics and so on, you get this complete cascade where now everything published in the English language is hyper emotional, more emotional than ever!

 

And that’s what’s happened to our society writ large. We live in a society where emotions rule over reason. Well, that is a society that is going to become deeply dysfunctional. Because that’s the definition of immaturity. That’s the definition essentially of insanity!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. When “hurt feelings” are the inspiration for crackdown on free speech. Can’t say this, can’t raise your arm in the air.

 

Basically, everything, every change legally, every social standard is built around not “hurting people’s feelings”. I can remember when I was in school, when I was in primary school, everything got banned. Everything the boys were doing got banned! And it got banned throughout my time in primary school. It’s like I was born in the exact right generation to see it all happen. First thing that got banned was Pokemon cards. And it happened on the day that I got my first ever deck on my birthday. I remember this like, I think I was in grade three and Mum bought me a deck of Pokemon cards. First time. I was excited to go to school with my new holographic nine tails and flex on all the boys because no one else had that. I think one other kid might have had it, but he was glorified for it.

 

Anyway, the day I get there, there’s an announcement on the speakers that Pokemon cards have been causing too much conflict amongst the boys and they’re banned. They’re no longer allowed. And if any boys had Pokemon cards on them, they had to leave them in their school bags, take them home and never bring them back. Pokemon cards banned!

 

So then we started playing Australian League football. We used the trees as goal posts. Three months later or so, that was banned! Because some kid got tackled and cried. And it was all banned by a female vice principal. The actual principal of the school was a man named Peter Williams, but he was never around. He was always absent. It seemed like the vice principal, some woman, I can’t remember her name, she was ruling the roost instead of him. She was the one banning everything. You know, we couldn’t play footy anymore, we couldn’t do Pokemon cards.

 

So then we started doing marbles that got banned because someone threw a marble at someone and their parents got called and they were unhappy about it. So no more marbles! Then British Bulldogs in the Marble Pit because there was no more use for the Marble Pit now.

 

So we just started playing British Bulldogs. But some kids shorts, school shorts, got torn a little bit when he got tackled and the parents, the mother called the school and bitched about it. And so that was banned!

 

And I remember we were sitting around once at lunchtime primary school. By the time everything was banned, we were like grade six, the final year of primary school.

 

And I said to the boys:

 

“What are we allowed to do? We can’t even do anything!”

 

We couldn’t even play brandy, throw a tennis ball at each other. And what is, what does Sewell call this? The gynocracy? I think he calls it the “Gynocracy”, where everything’s banned for the sake because someone might get hurt or it may upset someone, you’re not allowed to do it. No one’s allowed to have any sort of fun or do anything for the sake of saving feelings and someone might get hurt. So it’s not allowed.

 

And I witnessed all that in primary school. I witnessed the birth of the gynocracy. And now the gynocracy is in politics, now it’s in Parliament and now it’s bearing down on us from that position, from the position of institutional leadership. And that’s what we suffer, my friends, we suffer the giantocracy! And how do we defeat it? How do we defeat the giantocracy? By just not caring and doing whatever we want. Because the gynocracy has gone so far, there’s not even a lot of capable police officers anymore.

 

So it’s not like there’s any serious consequence waiting around the corner anyway. So I think that’s how you actually get around it. You literally just play whatever game you want to play, say whatever you want to say, make any gesture you want to make, believe what you want to believe, and so long as you’re not actually physically hurting anyone, who cares? Do what you want to do. I guess if enough people do that, then the gynocracy fails, right?

 

[1:22:21]

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the origin story of an ancient myth in our people, the myth of Percival, or of Parsifal, if you’re a German, who was one of the knights of King Arthur’s knights. One of the knights of the Round Table, who was one of the only ones to actually attain the Holy Grail. And at the beginning, when he was a boy, he was raised in the forest by his mother, and his mother basically kept him away from civilisation because his father and his two older brothers, they went and became knights and they died in battle. And she was all he had left. And so she took him out to the Woods and raised him in the Woods and told him nothing of his of his older brothers and of his father to try and keep him safe. And he’s playing out in the forest one day and he comes across some of the Knights of the Round Table, some of King Arthur’s knights, and they tell him all about what it’s like to be a knight. And immediately he’s like:

 

“I want to be a knight! That sounds awesome!”

 

And he goes back and he says:

 

“Mom, I’m going to go be a knight!”

 

And she has a mental breakdown:

 

“No, you can’t leave me. You must stay here where it’s safe!”

 

And eventually he wins the argument and she realises that there’s nothing that she can say to stop him. And she knits him a sweater to wear at all times and says:

 

“Wear this.”

 

And then he leaves and she dies of a broken heart. And there’s a later time where he’s in a great battle where he has to take the sweater off, take off the comfort of the gynocracy, basically, in order to win!

 

And that’s the beginning, that’s the origin story, is leaving behind security of the womb, the security of the kind of maternal sphere where everything is soft and all the threats are neutralised and everyone has to be nice to each other and sweet to each other and everyone is cared for and nurtured. In order to achieve your destiny, in order to become great, in order to become noble, you have to cast that off and go out. And go on adventures and fight and battle and so on, and find your way to the grail, to the meaning of it all, to be the hero.

 

So that’s a [word unclear] for a reason.

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that men need to be able to compete? Men need an outlet for the energy that they have as men. They need to be able to Barter and trade and fight. They need to be able to play sport. They need to be able to compete! If they can’t for the sake of people not getting hurt or feelings not getting hurt, don’t you think that’s why you see such radical explosions of rage in society now? That’s why men are so angry, because they’ve got all this repressed energy.

 

I mean, you hear stories about guys just snapping over what seems to be nothing, and you’ve got this domestic violence problem where a lot of the time it’s blamed on men, but really it’s just men are being pushed too far, or they’ve got so much repressed energy because there’s no way for them to actually express that basic competitive element, the desire to achieve something, the desire to build something, to work towards some greater projects. You know what I mean? Like there’s just kind of like no real outlet for a lot of men.

 

And so I think that’s why you’ve got examples or scenarios in society where some guy is setting a car on fire with his whole family inside, or just losing his shit at seemingly nothing. But really it was 20 years of the gynocracy telling him he’s not allowed to do anything because he’s bad because he’s a man! I don’t know. It’s something to think about because you can’t just cancel everything men do and expect men to react in some sort of obedient, passive way.

 

Obviously there’s going to be consequences for that. Men aren’t going to accept that. Men aren’t going to react well to that kind of system. I need to think more about this because the idea just came into my head then I’m so I’m not going to be able to articulate it as well as I’d like to.

 

Joel Davis: Also, everything wrong with our society is downstream from fucking cucked men! Men who adapt their behaviour to make their girlfriend or wife happy. Which means avoiding risk taking, not spending time with the boys, but spending time with her in the security of the lounge suite, watching goy flicks, eating Uber Eats, or taking her to out shopping or something. That’s what she wants to be doing. She wants to be safe. Maybe if she’s a so-called tradition wife, she wants to go move to the countryside and have chickens and shit! And she doesn’t want you getting arrested, she doesn’t want you going to jail, she doesn’t want you getting into fights, she doesn’t want you dying, and like okay, fair enough.

 

But ultimately that’s your destiny if you’re a political revolutionary, that’s your destiny. If you’re a true, if you’re a warrior, if you’re a man of nobility, a man of strength, you want to go and solve your own problems with your own strength. You don’t want to retreat to safety. That’s the pathway of the coward.

 

[1:27:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: I still don’t see it as either, or, though. I don’t see it as either, or. Like you should be able to spend time with women and fight for what you believe in. You shouldn’t have to choose. Why should you have to fucking choose?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean you don’t have to choose because women might try and gaslight you and pressure you, but at the end of the day if you just do what you want, they’ll just accept it. [chuckling] Like realistically.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s nice to make a woman happy. That’s also nice to fight for what you believe in. Like I get reward chemicals from doing both of those things. So I’d like to not in order to do the other. I don’t think it needs to be so two dimensional.

 

Joel Davis: No, I’m not suggesting that it is but ultimately like there’s going to be times where you have to choose one or the other and if you just always choose the cucked safe wife guy option, your life will pass by and you will have been domesticated. And you will not have actually expressed your virility and truly stood for anything. And you will become pacified and you will become neutralised and then you’ll die.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen those dads that actually admit that they’ve been domesticated in an extreme way? And they make a joke out of, they’re like:

 

“Yeah, my wife has my balls in a glass of water next to the bed, ha, ha, ha!”

 

And they like joke about it. What’s with that? That’s nothing to be proud of, bro! It’s not funny at all! [chuckling] You know, if your dad’s like that, if you know someone like that, tell them to wake up to themselves. You know, it’s not funny to not have any sort of sway over your domestic situation. To have no freedom.

 

Joel Davis: That’s what the weak do they do self depreciating jokes as a form of allaying their anxieties be like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a weak piece of shit! Isn’t that relatable? Aren’t you a weak piece of shit too? At least I can like have some kind of common ground with you in my existential dissatisfaction and shame.”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I actually can’t relate to that.”

 

Anyway, let’s do the Superchats and let’s. And let’s end the fucking stream! What do you think?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I was gonna shuffle off anyway because my eye hurts so much.

 

Joel Davis: Just hang out for five minutes and we’ll be done.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right.

 

Joel Davis: Jake 1219 said:

 

“Coming back to what Joel was saying, Winston, with the help of the British political (Winston Churchill), with the help of the British political establishment and the aristocratic establishment’s old money sold the West out for communism. 100%, right?”

 

I wouldn’t say communism. I’d say jewish interests.

 

But yeah, sure, we talked about that before. There was a show we did on World War II revisionism last year that I thought was pretty good. You can go back and watch that.

 

Home of the Brave said:

 

“‘Neo-Nazi boss’ Thomas Sewell, (as in quotation marks). The way the media covered your registering as a political party couldn’t have gone better. Can’t wait to see how you guys roll it all out. Could be the blueprint for us all.”

 

Well, yeah, it’s nice to get the promotion and it was funny. But yeah, it’s gonna be a process. It’s not happening tomorrow. The election is coming up obviously in a week. The next show is going to be about the election. I’m going to do other streams this week about the election and we’re going to have some other, we’ve got some other things planned for election week. We’re going to get Anzac Day over and done with first and then we’re going to focus on that.

 

But I will say it is funny how the Trumpet of Spastics party, how all of a sudden started copying half baked versions of our talking points and ideas in the last [chuckling] couple weeks and it could help sink the Liberal Party. So it’s pretty funny!

 

And as I said on Telegram:

 

“Clive, if you just called me up three months ago and gave me one of like one of the $90 million you’ve already wasted on this failed election campaign, I could have helped you run it much better and you would have got more votes.”

 

But instead of just stealing my ideas with no credit in a half assed way in the second last week of the election campaign. So you missed the boat on that one. Jake1219 also said:

 

“Question for both. 30% of Australia’s population were born overseas. How do you go about working jobs, operating current society socially, cordially with so many migrants in your face?”

 

I don’t personally. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: With great difficulty and a great amount of selectivity! And not without the urge to headbutt people on the regular. So it’s frustrating! It is, yeah. But when running your own business like I do, you can be selective especially because it’s like word of mouth through people who know people in an area where most people are Aussies, it’s not so bad.

 

But yeah, I could imagine it depends on the field in which you’re working. I know construction is getting pretty bad and you know, I’d probably stay right away from tech. The closer you are to the city, the worse it’s going to be. There’s various factors to consider. But the closer to the city you are, the more patience you’re going to need. I don’t have the patience man to work around these illustrious skilled labourers from overseas.

 

Joel Davis: Fellow Comrade said:

 

“I’m late. I will watch the replay. Thanks guys!”

 

Yeah, cheers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see we had $20 from the Comfy Friend who [chuckling] says:

 

“Gerard Rennick White power!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well if you’re in Queensland, give Gerard Rennick a vote. I hope he gets back into the Senate. He did call out the jews, the Mossad and so on.

 

And I think he’s a good man. You know he’s not everything that we would want, but he’s the best of the bunch. So I hope that he gets re-elected And I like him. I think he’s an all right guy. And a few our guys are working in his campaign team so respect to the grind. And yeah, obviously hail Comfy Friend, friend of the show. I think that’s all the Superchats. Let me check. I think that’s all the Superchats for this evening.

 

So yeah, everyone up early tomorrow for Anzac Day. And yeah, make sure you’re down there. And be there for the ancestors. Venerate tomorrow. Treat tomorrow like a religious holiday. That’s what it is, a day to commemorate our national religion of the ancestors who gave blood for our people. That’s what it’s about. And hail White Australia and hail the Anzacs. Why Power! Fellow Comrades said:

 

“One more Superchat for fun.”

 

Well thanks dude and we’ll end it there. See you next time.

 

[1:34:46]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/25/2025 = 10)

Supporter
6 hours ago
same thing the Americans in WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam etc fought for….. Nothing Their lives were wasted
4 likes
Report

‹ Hide 1 reply
TheBeardedIndian
Supporter+
3 hours ago
Top comment. These war memorial events should not be a celebration of sacrifice, they should be annual reminders of not being duped again into dying for no good reason. Celebrating these wars furthers the Jewish plan for Christians to slaughter each other.
0 likes
Report

ThigASteach
Supporter
8 hours ago
Great conversation. Appreciate you guys. #PeaceAndRespect
3 likes
Report

katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – So Much Has Happened, But We’re Only Just Getting Started – Apr 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/04/12/joel-davis-so-much-has-happened-but-were-only-just-getting-started-apr-11-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream video episode Aussie nationalist activists Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell have a discussion, followed by a separate Blair Cottrell and Joel Davis discussion. The two separate discussion are a result of severe and unreasonable bail conditions imposed on Tom and Joel as a result of police and court harrassment.
2 likes

Delete
fastnail
5 hours ago
And the British and Irish.
1 like
Report

TheShowgun
SubSupporter+
5 hours ago
prayin for your well health Blair!! although, Blair with an eyepatch would go hard af..
0 likes
Report

BlueNorth88
3 hours ago
Blair’s missus can really bang
0 likes
Report

GlobalistJuice
3 hours ago
Joel would be an awesome teacher of history in Australia’s schools – his storytelling is sublime, a flowing voice that is detail engaging with appropriate inflection while retaining a smooth masculine tone that is easy-on-the-ears.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair said something like “The youth are more radical because they’re desensitized,” not because they’re more intellectually curious and open. Sounds correct. I’ll take it though. The masses are a force multiplier for whoever can move them. We just need to be the coolest thing out there and the mindless kids will follow.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair is wondering if he’s a “mere” entertainer. He is, but shows like this are crucial to making these concepts cool and normalizing them. So he plays a crucial role in allowing us to eventually instrumentalize the normie to our ends (and for their benefit).
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel: You are listening to Another Voice of Freedom broadcast financed through the free will donations of listeners like yourself. I’m Ernst Zundel, your host and moderator. The opinions expressed by our guests or in editorials and stories are always those of the originators. We believe that personal opinions freely expressed are not a danger to any democratic society. We don’t have to agree with any or all of the opinions expressed by others. We owe it to ourselves, however, to listen, to evaluate, and to possibly learn something new or different in the process. You may reach us at 206 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5A 2L1. Telephone 1492-29850 [Note: All contact details out of date].

 

And now we have another interesting program for you.

 

I’m Ernst Zundel with Another Voice of Freedom program. A number of our listeners from around the country, and some even as far away as Europe, have contacted us about our recent programs relating to D-Day and the period in Europe after D-Day, and some of our revisionist viewpoints that we hold on this topic. Well, some of them complained that I, in my programs had not spelled out in more detail what the Second World War was all about and how it came about.

 

So let me try to give it a layman’s overview. Nothing academic, just a layman’s overview. The Germans in the First World War were defeated by a coalition of forces, and the German government under the Weimar Republic was asked to sign a treaty in Versailles. And one of the stipulations of that treaty was that the Germans had to declare themselves solely responsible for the First World War.

 

And of course, with the loss of Germany’s territories in the east, coupled with this slap in the face for the entire German nation, who knew that they had not been solely responsible for this tragedy, which was the First World War. This meant there was a fertile soil for nationalists, or even extreme nationalists to agitate against the existing order of things.

 

Germany, you must understand, was under some form of Allied tutelage, was under military occupation in some regions. Germany was condemned to pay reparations, huge amounts of reparations which were to only run out in the year 1988! I want to repeat that these massive billions of dollars worth of gold marks of reparations the Germans were to pay to the Allies, were to be running till the year 1988. That was reparations the Germans had to pay for the First World War.

 

The reason why I’m stressing that is because, of course, it bankrupted the German nation, led to hyperinflation where people were paid three times a day, mornings, noon and night, because the money devalued between breakfast and lunch, sometimes by millions of marks!

 

And so when men were receiving their paycheck, they didn’t go and bring a wallet at the end of the week, they usually brought a basket.

 

And finally, some of the store and shop owners paid their people every single evening, because hyperinflation was running away with the currency in Germany.

 

My own mother, a very simple young girl, said that she worked for a whole month and at the end of the month, all she could buy with her earnings for that month in 1923, was a stamp with which to send a postcard to her parents. That is what the situation was!

 

In that situation, Adolf Hitler, a very gifted young orator in Germany, started his struggle for power. And he struggled against those who had signed this shameful treaty in Versailles and against those who had imposed it on Germany. And he found increasing resonance amongst the German population. At first the working people, finally an ever increasing number amongst Germany’s students, then amongst the more middle classes, and finally even amongst the intelligentsia, meaning Professors, doctors, dentists, lawyers and so on.

 

Then Adolf Hitler democratically moved into the Reichstag, and because his party was the party that had Garnered most votes in a coalition with other nationalist forces, finally became the government of Germany in 1933, on 30 January.

 

While Hitler was struggling for power, he had said over and over in thousands of speeches and talks and articles in his party newspaper and so on, and many of his Members of Parliament, the Reichstag at that time said to the German population:

 

“Understand that a vote for National Socialism does not mean a change of government in Germany.”

 

In other words, it’s not a change of administration. It’s not the Democrats being replaced by the Republicans, or in the Canadian context, the Liberals replacing the Conservatives. He said:

 

“What you are doing with this election, it is a plebiscite on which way Germany is going to go.”

 

In other words, there are going to be some fundamental changes in German society. And he had outlined them to the German population quite openly and quite freely, what he thought Germany should look like in the 1930s. The Germans were not sucked into or conned into voting for yet another politician who had made all kinds of promises that he wasn’t going to keep.

 

My own mother and my own father, who had been unemployed for four years by the time Adolf Hitler finally did come to power, said that they had tried the Conservatives, they had voted for the Catholic Party, the Christian Center Party, they had even voted for the Social Democratic Party. Other Germans, disgusted by all this party wrangling voted for the Communist Party.

 

And there was a polarization of political opinion and political action and the political spectrum in Germany in the 1930s between the extreme Left and, yes, the extreme nationalist Right.

 

Hitler represented the Right, the forces of the Right, and together with a number of smaller parties, finally did form the government, as I said. And he was hardly in power when an international boycott was called against Germany.

 

And the reason why I’m mentioning this is because in the next few programs, we are going to take a look exactly at what happened in “Nazi Germany”, the way the popular press calls it, or National Socialist Germany, in Hitler’s Germany after he came to power.

 

[07:46]

 

Let me just say to you that in studying this period of time, I found that Germany was in a terribly shocking state! And that, for instance, in the state of Thuringia, which is in the east, the budget for social welfare was two thirds of the state’s budget was eaten up by social welfare. Two thirds. You can imagine, that means so many people were unemployed, were on the dole, were half employed and so on. A state cannot function with this kind of budget. And so a crisis was looming large in Germany.

 

Also, the foreign currency reserves of Germany had gone down to such a level that when the German economics minister mentioned this to the new government, Hitler was alarmed. It was down to some 480 million marks, which, for a trading nation like Germany that depended on financing exports and so on, it was virtually the death knell. Germany was, to all intents and purposes, bankrupt!

 

How to get out of this situation was what dominated the mind of the new government. And during this particular time, there were rumors around the world that they were going to be preventive wars. There was going to be an invasion of Germany either by France or by Poland or by both governments.

 

Now, at the time, these two countries were, in a European context, superpowers. You must understand that the Treaty of Versailles condemned the German government to a force of professional soldiers of 100,000 people, just 100,000 men! That meant the entire German armed forces could fit into the Berlin soccer stadium.

 

Now, picture that. The Berlin soccer stadium. The only weapons that they had were machine guns. When they were practicing with tanks, they were bicycles with cardboard cutouts made to look like tanks. Because Germany was the only totally disarmed country and it was forced to disarm under the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler knew all this. In other words, he was in absolutely no position to threaten anybody! Others were threatening his government.

 

And suddenly there were these news from North America that the jewish community in North America was Calling for an international boycott against Germany! There was a man called Samuel Untermeyer, who had gone to Amsterdam for a conference. And when he returned to the United States, he gave a nationally broadcast radio program in which he called for a holy war against Germany, a national boycott.

 

And naturally, Hitler’s ambassadors and consular officials reported that back to Germany. So did the media. Hitler was alarmed! Here was the threat of military invasion, economic strangulation. Inside Germany the communists were restive. And so Hitler did what other German Chancellors had done before him, perfectly Democratic measure to call out some kind of an Emergency Measures Act. In Canada, we would call it the War Measures Act.

 

Into this period fell a fire that was started by apparently a communist, or a man with communist leadings called Van der Lubbe, who tried to burn down the Reichstag, meaning the German Parliament. Apparently as some kind of a note to other Leftists, to start simultaneously all over Germany similar activities and to try to have an overthrow of the German government.

 

Now, I know that in Allied propaganda, Hermann Goering is supposedly himself having carried a canister of gasoline through some secret tunnels into the Reichstag, and he’s supposed to have had a kind of a hand in burning down the Reichstag. Well, perfectly independent people and historical commissions and inquiries by independent historians during, before, during and after the war have come to the conclusion that, in effect, the Nazis did not torch the Reichstag! That it was a canard put out by communist and Leftist propaganda.

 

Hitler used this as his means of introducing draconian repressive measures inside Germany, outlawing political parties, political movements, arrest without habeas corpus and so on. It was a typical emergency measure act!

 

Now, I want you immediately to understand this is not to excuse Adolf Hitler and him breaking the civil rights of Germans. I am just trying to explain to you that this is nothing new in European history, certainly absolutely nothing new of the period. And in Canada, as late as 1972, we had what they called “the invoking of the War Measures Act”.

 

Actually, it was earlier still, during the FLQ crisis, the Front des Liberation Qui Pequoi, which was a Leftist group that was blowing up mailboxes, the stock market building and so on. And the Canadian government, in perfect peacetime, prosperous, not surrounded by enemies that were trying to invade our country here, imposed a War Measures Act. I lived there during the time in Quebec, and I can assure you here is what happened.

 

Hundreds, many, many, many hundreds of French-Canadian activists who had been politically vocal in wanting to have separation between Quebec and the rest of the country were rounded up at night. 4:00, 5:00, 3:00 o’clock in the morning. And they were arrested without any legal representation. They were put into sports arenas, meaning concentrated into the same kind of area that Hitler would take his dissidents and so on in the early 30s.

 

They were kept in there. Some of them were kept in jails in Canada without having the rights that we normally have to be brought before a judge speedily and so on, because the War Measures act had declared a national emergency, saying that there was imminent danger to the survival of Canada as a society and as a state. And then your civil rights went out the window.

 

Well, that’s exactly what happened to Germans in the Hitler era, as soon as Adolf Hitler came to power, because there was this perceived threat to the German state, the overthrow of the German government. And Hitler invoked what he called the Enabling Act, where he spelled out what his moves were going to be.

 

And so Germany, that moment, became somewhat of a dictatorship. True, there were elections and there were plebiscites later on, but ultimately, Hitler governed Germany under this kind of draconian enabling legislation, which allowed him to forbid parties and movements and seize newspapers, outlaw publishing houses and stuff like this, very much the way the West German state has been doing in the last six to seven months.

 

[15:26]

 

And again, Germany has no threat of invasion. Germany has no threat that the state is going to be overthrown. Yet the ruling clique in power in Germany says:

 

“Oh, we have got political dissidents here that are getting entirely too testy. They are having these big marches of 4, 5, 10,000 people. Our police forces can no longer control them, meaning they cannot cow them into silence. And even 10,000 policemen last fall could not prevent a march in honor of Rudolf Hess, for instance. And so therefore, we are going to pass this draconian legislation.”

 

Which they tried to do recently on the 20th of June with their what they call crime bill. But the German Parliament, at that time, the Upper House, at least voted down this draconian law.

 

Well, in Hitler’s Germany they did not, because National Socialism at that time, as I said, had the superior numbers. And so Germany began to rebuild under those measures with limited freedoms, restricted freedom of expression. And Hitler managed by all kinds of means, which we are going to cover in future programs, to prevent the invasion by France and by Poland, to prevent the boycott from crippling and destroying the German economy. And Adolf Hitler and his government went on and governed Germany in peace time for another six years.

 

And by the year 1936, we are able already to absorb all the millions and millions of unemployed in Germany and the surrounding countries. Two million people worked as guest workers in Germany in 1937 and 38, at a time when the rest of Europe was, and America, may I say, and Canada was still very much suffering under a depression!

 

Hitler’s Germany was like a beautifully tended garden surrounded by a bunch of gardens full of weeds.

 

And of course, the envy of the people who tilled the gardens, meaning the governments of the particular day, was rife everywhere! Not the people. For instance, Hitler had this program where he was going to [actually did] send hard working miners and farmers and so on these cruise ships to distant places in North Africa, in Egypt, in Greece or in Norway.

 

And it was such a hit with the working people of Europe that ordinary people could actually go on cruises that England forbade the landing of these German cruise ships in British ports! Because rather than giving their own working people such a break, they found it much easier just to restrict German ships from landing and not getting British workers envious.

 

What I’m saying to you is Hitler made Germany prosper! He made the trains run on time. Things hummed in Germany. Germany broke all kinds of records on the ground, in the air, with cars, with planes. National Socialist Germany in peacetime was a progressive, thriving country. And the people that lived there during that particular time apparently kind of allowed this restricted freedom that they couldn’t have different opinions and so on. They traded social security, financial security, bread and butter stuff over freedom.

 

It has always troubled me that that’s the way it was, but that’s the way it was. I personally am far more of a believer in individualism and freedom than that particular generation. But the Germans, after all, if the majority does rule by their majority, and by constantly reaffirming Hitler in power and his government decided that was the way they were perfectly willing to live, who am I to say in 1994 that they didn’t have the right to do that?

 

Now, why did the war break out? Because apparently Hitler was a sworn enemy of Marxism, Communism, then called Bolshevism. And Europe had these Bolshevik uprisings, especially in Hungary, Romania. Also in the east, especially in Russia, where a lot of blood was spilled, where hundreds of thousands, millions we know today, tens of millions of people were butchered in the most gruesome way, worked to death in the Gulag, worked to death while building canals through mosquito infested swamps and so on.

 

Today, now that the archives are open and the mass graves are being found in the Crimea and in the Ukraine and in Russia proper. Mass graves that hold 200, 240, 300,000 people and we have only just scratched the surface.

 

So the Bolsheviks who were in the east, armed to the teeth, had always said that they believed in world revolution and they were appealing to the workers around the world in uprising after uprising.

 

I know, I’ve got a book in my bookshelves here about a communist uprising in Brazil. Then we had the communist uprising in Spain. It was known at that time in Europe that communism was a huge threat to Western values and Western civilization.

 

Adolf Hitler was a strong opponent of Marxism. He considered it almost like an evil religion. And when President Ford, and later on much more so President Reagan and President Nixon before them had certain anti-communist statements made, President Reagan was the one that coined the phrase “the evil empire”. Well, let me tell you, Adolf Hitler had called Bolshevism and the Soviet Union “an evil empire” already in 1920s! And had initiated policies to contain the evil empire in the late 1930s. Making what he called the anti-Comintern pact with Italy, Japan and Germany.

 

[22:05]

 

And he also knew from his intelligence services that Russia [Soviet Union], armed to the teeth as they were, were pulling together troops at the Eastern border.

 

And so he knew that they were going to attack Germany and Western Europe. How did he know? Because the German armed forces and the German spy system against communism worked. They had lots and lots of ethnic Europeans in the east who were siding with the German government. And so their information was excellent!

 

But when Hitler finally ended up in this terrible tragedy with Poland, which France and England used as a declaration, as the reason for a declaration of war against Germany, Hitler knew that he had to quickly finish the continental powers in a kind of a pre-emptive quick strike in order to keep his back free, because he knew that the Soviet Union was arming and ready and rearing to go and invade Germany from the East. Germany didn’t have enough land, enough depth, geopolitically speaking, geographically speaking, to absorb the massive invasion forces which were then beginning to build up on her Eastern Frontier.

 

And so, luckily for Germany, France was subdued quickly, Holland and Belgium also. And Hitler could now turn his attention to the east. By now, his air force, using the very latest in technology, high altitude planes, quite similar to the later the very famous U2 spy planes which Francis Gary Powers used to fly over the Soviet Union. Hitler had similar planes, not quite as sophisticated, of course, but he could penetrate with his reconnaissance airplanes, flying at tremendously high altitudes for the first time using pressurized cabins, way into the heartland of Russia.

 

How do we know it? Because we have books about it. One man has been on my mailing list for three decades. His name is George Pemler. George Pemler, P E M L E R. He has written a book called, Der Flug zum Don, published by Drufel publishing house in Germany, in which he details and shows with all kinds of photographs the massive build-up of Soviet forces on the German border.

 

 

And so Hitler knew that he was not strong enough to just merely defend himself against Russia. And so they decided to pre-emptorily strike at the build-up of the Soviet forces very much the way Israel did in a repeat policy. And many people said, using a copycat plan against the Arab world in 1967 with exactly the same results. The Israelis attacked air fields in Egypt, in Syria and in other places, in Jordan, destroying the planes on the ground. They attacked missile batteries, destroying them on the ground.

 

And once they were silenced, then the ground forces, Israel’s tank forces, could sweep through the desert, driving the Arab forces before them into the desert. And ultimately Israel scored a stunning defeat in a very, very short war called the Six Day War.

 

Hitler’s forces did exactly the same thing in 1941 in the east. And the German air force that was opposed by over 14,000 Soviet planes knocked down over 12,500 planes or bombed them underground within the first two weeks of the war. The German air force at that time had less than 4,000 3,750 planes. The same could be said for ground forces, tank forces and so on. It was not German massive armor that won this. It was superior German generalship and planning. And also the elandes, the spirit of the German troops.

 

However, they were unable to deliver a knockout blow against the Soviet Union, which the world had expected. Basically, we know today because of treason in German ranks! Treason was the reason for Hitler not winning the war against the Soviet Union. And this is why Germany got stuck in the east!

 

And this is why these huge battles of attrition in Stalingrad, where over 300,000 German men marched into Stalingrad and where only 6,000 of them came back after the Second World War from Stalin’s Gulag. 96,000 prisoners were taken. About 90,000 of them vanished!

 

And you wonder why there were so few planes, so few troops, so few tanks in the West. Well, I tell you, they were in the east defending Europe, Western Europe against the Soviet onslaught, against the hordes of the evil empire, as President Reagan would have called it.

 

And so Europe’s men, we have to remember that, the Hungarians, the Slovakians, the many Polish volunteers, Ukrainian volunteers, Danish, Dutch volunteers. Alone in Denmark, four times as many people were serving in the SS in the German armed forces of Danish nationality than were serving in the Danish armed forces and police! This is an incredible statistic which very few people know.

 

[See: The Epic Story of the Waffen SS – Leon Degrelle]

 

So Hitler’s Germany was defending Europe’s interest in the east. And this is why the Allies had such an easy time in the West. This is why the there were only 270 operational tanks and only 375 planes to meet the Allies’ 12,000 planes in the West. They were bleeding to death in the east for Europe. And so look at it in the context of a German or of Germany. The Germans defended Europe and European style civilization against Soviet Bolshevism.

 

And so this was the reason that I should have given you before we went into Normandy.

 

However, the next series of programs that you’re going to hear have to do largely with Israel and German jewish relations. And I think it is timely because very, very little has been said about this period in history and the German side of it.

 

I am Ernst Zundel speaking for The Voice of Freedom. Yes, I am a son of the Germans using the facilities of North American radio stations and the freedom guaranteed to me by the United States, Constitution, by the Canadian Bill of Rights, or the other way around, to bring you dissident or different information. And all I’m asking you is. You don’t have to believe me. Just open up your mind to our German viewpoint and our Germans.

 

We are located at 206 Carlton street in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Our postal code is M5A 2L1. Our telephone 416-922-9850 [Note: All contact details out of date]. Thank you very much.

 

Ernst Zundel here thanking you for your support.

 

[29:34]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/2/2025 = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 04 with Oscar – Jul 20, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 09 with Grace Eki Oyama – Aug 24, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 20 with Kathleen Dudley – Nov 16, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 24 – Prof Tony Hall – Dec 21, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 27 – Germar Rudolf – Jan 18, 2025 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 36 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zundel – Mar 22, 2025

 

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 36 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zundel – Mar 22, 2025 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – Another Voice of Freedom Radio – Why World War II Started – 1994 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – 1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics 1 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – 1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics 2 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979

An Open Letter to New Jersey’s Governor

Historians or Hoaxers?

House of Orwell

Misha: Surviving with Wolves or …

Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

The Plum Cake

 

 

 

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

Powers and Principalities XI – Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra, Holocaust Revisionism — TRANSCRIPT

Tales of the Holohoax – A Historian’s Assessment – Part 1

The Holocaust Lie — Made in America

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained — TRANSCRIPT

Jim Rizoli Interviews Prof Robert Faurisson, Oct 2015 — TRANSCRIPT

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Inside Auschwitz – You’ve never seen THIS before! — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!

AUSCHWITZ – A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen

Jim Rizoli Interviews Bradley Smith — TRANSCRIPT

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Ingrid Carlqvist – Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Carolyn Yeager on Johnson vs Anglin debate — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to tonight’s stream. Sorry we’re a couple of minutes late. I had a few things to do with the family. Sunday night bedtimes, never easy, but here we are. So we might run five minutes over to make it up to you.

 

Now, obviously, this is a very important stream and we’re live tonight on Rumble. We’re live on Odysee, we’re live on DLive, and we’re live on Entropy.

 

And if you want to share this, please do, because this is an important debate and I’m going to be dealing with this slightly differently tonight to how other people have dealt with this, because I want to ask Joel some really searching questions and I also want to discuss the wider issues around this debate.

 

So if you can share this, it would be very much appreciated and I’ll be sharing it myself on Telegram in a couple of seconds.

 

Now, I’d like to thank Joel firstly for getting up so early in the morning to do this. He’s already knocking back the energy drink and this is an hour later than I usually do stream. So thank you to all the people who have turned up, regardless of the sort of slightly strange scheduling, and to all the Australian guests who have woken up super early.

 

Now, obviously there’s been a lot of people debating this over the last couple of days. There’s been a lot of people in my chat debating this today when I announced the stream. So if you want to put a question to Joel, you can through Odysee or Entropy, if you want to send a Superchat, you can.

 

Now, I’m going to ask Joel questions, and depending on the number of Superchats, I will ask him questions from the audience in the second half of the show. And we’re aiming to go for between about an hour and a half and two hours, two hours max. And in this time, I want to allow Joel to assert himself, but I also want to ask him questions that are what I think are the most sort of common and sort of overdone critiques of what Joel is saying. I do want to see how he answers those. And I have a few critiques of what he says.

 

And I also have a few questions about certain things that, from my perspective, I find a little bit odd about what’s going on at the moment. You might be thinking:

 

“What are you talking about? Why is all this odd?”

 

Well, I’ll explain that in a few minutes.

 

But if you want to put your questions to Joel, you can do. Now, any Superchats go to a good cause. So if you do want to make a donation, if you do want to support the stream, please do. So and you can do that via Odysee or Entropy. As I said earlier, just hit that support button and all funds are gratefully received.

 

Now, let’s get into this. Listening to the debate, because most people have seen the debate. The debate started when Keith Woods wrote an article about this saying why no one should be invested at all in National Socialism and why it sort of needed to be dumped. And this came on the back of Keith actually doing sort of a debunking of sorts of Europa the Last Battle.

 

Now, I’ve seen Europa the Last Battle, I think it’s excellent, I really enjoyed it. But Keith had a few negative things to say about it and a few people were like:

 

“Well why is Keith doing this, why is he going down this route, etc?”

 

And look, I really like Keith, think he’s an intelligent guy. I’ve had him on the show plenty of times. I’ve not met him in real life, but he seems really nice. He’s always very, very affable. But Keith hasn’t debated Joel publicly about this, and I think that’s a bit of a mistake on Keith’s part. Because I think if your ideas are going to stand up and they’re going to be held to scrutiny, they have to do so not in the vacuum of your own personal writings on your Substack, but in the open field of debate with your contemporaries.

 

Now, when I was held to account for certain things I said about Vladimir Putin, Russia, Ukraine, etc, well, I went on a debate and I debated Greg Johnson, and around 80% of the people who voted afterwards said they thought I won that debate, which was happy about. But if I don’t feel confident in what I’m saying, maybe I wouldn’t have done the debate. But I do feel confident. I think Keith should debate Joel. I messaged both of them and I’d have liked them to have done this as an actual debate.

 

But obviously Joel’s come on and I’m gonna sort of play a little bit of devil’s advocate here to spice things up a little bit. And I’ll also give my personal view nearer the end of this.

 

Now, I’m gonna start by saying:

 

“Look, Joel, I really respect you.”

 

I’ve met you in person, I really like you, and I think you are one of the leading young intellectuals in the world-wide nationalist movement. And you get plenty of praise, you get plenty of fantastic media appearances, and you always do very, very well. You’ve also been a speaker at one of my events, a Patriotic Alternative event, and you did excellently. Your speeches were always fantastic! And you’re somebody who is face out. You’re somebody who’s put your neck on the line and your name on the line.

 

[05:03]

 

So if anyone in the chat is going to be sort of besmirching this guy, I’ve seen some people attacking Joel. Personally, I think that’s very unfair. Joel isn’t sort of a faceless, nameless Internet pseudonym who comes out and says things. Joel is somebody who is brave enough to say what he thinks and say it under his own name using his own face.

 

So I want to sort of keep this clean and if there are trolls in the chat, I won’t have any hesitation but to Whack-A-Mole them out of existence! So please do be respectful in the chat and keep it clean.

 

Now, that doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything Joel says, but please do sort of keep it clean and no ludicrous accusations being thrown around, etc, etc. Because as I say, I do value Joel highly.

 

And anyway, let’s get into this. I’ve been speaking for about five minutes, and that’s five minutes too long. So everyone wants to hear what Joel’s got to say. So, Joel, my friend, I’m going to tap away furiously and send out the notifications to say we’re live.

 

But would you like to give us sort of five minutes of your position on this, sort of summarize things in five minutes and then we’ll get into this?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So obviously I wrote a Substack essay which was a response to Keith’s, because Keith’s Substack post was actually a response to me. He referenced a series of Telegram posts that I made and he literally put like, A Response to Joel Davis as the as the subheading of the essay. So I thought I should say something back. And obviously, for those that have been around a while would know, Keith and I are old associates. I have met Keith in real life multiple times when I’ve been in Europe. We’re old friends. I known him for like six years or something. And we’ve had a lot of discussions about a lot of subjects over the years.

 

So if we disagree on something publicly, it’s actually the product of probably a lot of private disagreements over a very long period of time manifesting in some public form.

 

So he decided to make an essay. I thought this gives me an opportunity to explain my position in a way that’s probably engaging for the audience. So then I did an essay myself, but the essay that I did deal with Keith’s arguments at the end of the essay. But the bulk of the essay is actually the substance of my position. And there’s kind of like two aspects to the debate.

 

One aspect is the question of rehabilitation, and the other aspect is actually identifying as a National Socialist in an explicit way. What I was arguing for, in a very strong sense, was the necessity of rehabilitation, because Keith attacked both notions. I also identify as a National Socialist for various reasons, but the essay that I wrote is primarily a defense of the rehabilitation of National Socialism. Why, even if you want to call your nationalism by a different term or you want to embrace nationalism in a slightly modified way or whatever, that there needs to be a project of rehabilitation of many of the elements of National Socialism so that you’re free to use them essentially, so that you don’t have to do nationalism with the training wheels on, so to speak. So you don’t have to do nationalism under the limitations of distinguishing yourself from the National Socialists, which I think is undoubtedly a reality that we face in the contemporary situation.

 

There was one part of Keith’s original article where he basically almost said:

 

“Oh, well, it’s becoming irrelevant these days, World War II and the Nazis, and it’s fading away, so we should just let it fade away.”

 

But the whole premise of the article itself was that it’s actually nuclear! There’s all this stigma around National Socialism. And so attaching ourselves to it in any way, in any kind of positive way, is actually really negative. So it doesn’t make any sense. It kind of it both ways. Like either the stigma exists or it doesn’t.

 

And I think it obviously exists. I don’t know how you can say that it isn’t still probably the most controversial subject in all of politics. So clearly that’s there, right?

 

Also, there’s the reality that the entire post World War II international order has really been built around a response to the Second World War and the ideological dispute that retroactively became the meaning of the Second World War. Now there’s all these more geopolitical or economic or like practical reasons why World War II came into existence.

 

But ultimately the meaning of World War II, according to its victorious allies, was the destruction of the ideology of National Socialism. So like, apparently the reason why we had to declare war on Germany at the beginning was because they invaded Poland and we gave Poland a security guarantee, but the war ends with Poland under Soviet control anyway. And the Soviets also invaded Poland and we didn’t declare war on them. In fact, we allied with them against National Socialism.

 

[10:12]

 

Mark Collett: Like, this is getting into the weeds already. I mean, let me start this again in a way that I think is a better way to start this.

 

So I’ve been involved in this cause for two and a half decades. And when I first got involved, most people that I met in the cause were in some way, either they were either openly sort of National Socialists, covertly National Socialists, or they’d been influenced in some way by National Socialism.

 

Now the first thing I find very difficult to sort of comprehend about Keith’s position is the complete disavowal of National Socialism is odd, because whether you’re a National Socialist or not, and whether you identify as a National Socialist or not, I’ve got to say that pretty much any genuine nationalist movement in the world today shares the two central tenets of National Socialism, which are the nationalism and the socialism.

 

You do this for your people, which is the nationalism. You do this for your country. You do this because you want a homogenous closed bordered nation, that’s the national.

 

But you do this because you want your people to treat each other like a family. You don’t want your people to be preying on each other. You don’t want the rich preying on the poor. You don’t want the owners of capital preying on the worker. You want the workers and the owners of capital to work hand in hand. You want the rich to give the poor a leg up and you want the poor then to work hard so the rich have the capital to help the poor up further. There is a social aspect to nationalism.

 

So National Socialism, whatever you say about it, those two central strands run through every nationalist organisation that is alive today that is up and going.

 

So I looked at when I was involved in the BNP, we went out into working class communities and we told those people that we wanted British jobs for British workers. We wanted a homogeneous society, we wanted to end immigration, we wanted a fair wage for the working man, we wanted to make sure the NHS worked for normal people. Now the BNP was not a National Socialist party by any means, but to deny that there wasn’t the national and the social in the BNP would be to deny reality.

 

And really, I see where you’re going with this, but I felt that everyone that’s spoken to you about this, without being disrespectful to the people who have spoken to you or talking over you, have failed to grasp the fundamentals of this debate. And where I’m coming from is to say that National Socialism has no relevance would be to say that every nationalist movement today that incorporates the national and the social also has no relevance. And whilst these movements may not be National Socialist, you can see where they’ve come from and you can see a synergy.

 

And this is where I didn’t really understand Greg Johnson or Keith Woods’s position, because I don’t see how you can deny what I’ve just said. But please give your perspective.

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, well, like in my essay, because as I said, the essay fundamentally was a defense of my position on the basis of itself. And then I dealt with some of Keith’s criticisms, what I thought his main criticisms were at the end in light of that. And I basically broke down my position into three main subjects.

 

The first is that nationalism isn’t an ideology in my view. Nationalism is an idea, but it’s an idea that has historically been mixed with other ideologies, in particular liberalism. So from the late 18th century up until the early 20th century, there was a lot of nationalist liberal movements, but there’s been plenty of other kinds of nationalist movements as well throughout history. Nationalism is itself can just be seen as an idea, not necessarily the only idea which is of concern or even the most fundamental idea. It can just be one of many ideas that are considered valuable by a particular political party or movement or what have you. So my point was that nationalism needs an ideology to serve it.

 

And if you value the nationalist idea to its most fundamental, I believe National Socialism is a political ideology that is basically built entirely out of the nationalist idea without basically taking in any other elements. It’s basically starting at the idea of nationalism and then working it out to its absolute logical conclusion. And that’s what differentiated it from many of the liberal nationalist movements of its time and prior to its time, because National Socialism purged all the liberal qualities from nationalism.

 

This is significant because of the second part of my argument, which was a dialectical argument, which is that basically nationalism and liberalism have become incompatible not just because of the decision, like some kind of like specific concrete decision to turn nationalism against liberalism, because there was a bunch of nationalists who didn’t like liberalism, but because actually nationalism as an idea and liberalism as an idea are actually contradictory. And I appeal to the work of Carl Schmitt, particularly his Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy to make that point, because he basically said this in the early 1920s. He was probably the greatest German political theorist of his time. He obviously ended up joining the party. Carl Schmitt is still studied today as one of the great political thinkers of all time, despite that association.

 

You know, someone’s a really excellent intellectual when they could have been a Nazi and they still get taught in the universities in the contemporary era, like Martin Heidegger. Carl Schmitt is a very like rare Nazi intellectual, that’s just too good to cancel. Right?

 

But Carl Schmitt basically predicted and articulated what was happening and predicted the 20th century, the trajectory of politics where liberalism and nationalism would turn against one another and become enemies. Where previously they had been allies. That was mostly galvanised by, particularly from the late 18th, early 19th century, their mutual opposition to monarchy in various respects.

 

So you can think of a few examples of this, like say you’re in the Austro-Hungarian empire, right? You’re in this multi-ethnic empire and you are a nationalist and you want to liberate your particular ethnic group from some multi-ethnic empire. Well, obviously you’re going to kind of find common cause with a liberal notion of popular sovereignty, of:

 

“Oh well, we can liberate ourselves and create a Parliamentary system that represents our people directly.”

 

Or you know, look at like the French Revolution and its consequences. You know, if you’re going to come along and say:

 

“Well, we speak on behalf of the French people by virtue of the fact of our Parliamentary system and the King doesn’t, the King is the enemy of the people.”

 

Or whatever. You can appeal to nationalism and legitimate a liberal revolution like that. Or in America there were appeals to nationalism to differentiate the American interest from the British Empire, and the list goes on.

 

So there was a tension between nationalist interests and monarchical interests. And therefore common cause was found historically for various reasons.

 

[18:12]

 

But then basically the old monarchies of Europe were largely, by the end of World War I, they’d been largely defeated. Now liberalism had had a pretty totalizing victory over Western European politics. But liberalism for Schmitt is built around this idea because liberalism is built on the notion of the social contract and the Constitution. Liberalism is built around this idea of basically protecting the rights of individuals and the rights of minority groups against the majority will. It’s not, Americans will often say:

 

“We’re a Republic, not a democracy.”

 

Or something like that. You’ll hear Conservatives say that:

 

“Well, that’s what that idea is, which is that you have certain rights and liberties as an individual or as a minority group, which the state can’t violate even if the will of the majority is against you.”

 

Well, this is actually in direct opposition to the pure notion of popular sovereignty, the pure notion of democracy, which is that the will of the people should triumph.

 

And the will of the people isn’t just okay, if we’ve got like a set of voters and 50% plus one of our citizens vote for something that means it’s the will of the people. No, that’s not what Rousseau meant by the notion of popular sovereignty or the general will. And that’s not what Schmitt is talking about the popular sovereignty or the general will, to use the Rousseau’s term, as understood by Schmitt, is people who think in terms of the common interest, in terms of the national interest. Right. So what National Socialism means is putting the social, in the sense, the interests of society at large first!

 

But obviously that is understood in national terms. The national community’s interests come first before any individual or minority group interest, class interest, whatever other type of interest.

 

So therefore, the idea of democracy can only really be realised in the idea of nationalism, in the idea of putting the national interest before any of these other minority groups, or including the individual themselves.

 

And so therefore there’s this collision course between the idea of liberalism and the idea of nationalism, where. And that’s built into the notion of liberal democracy, that actually, you can’t have democracy without nationalism. Actually, democracy is illiberal when taken to its final conclusion as a notion.

 

And so that mutual collision course that was built into the ideas ends up realizing itself in a very concrete way in the 20th century.

 

And that’s what I posit. National Socialism was the ultimate historical materialisation of and the making concrete of was this phenomenon. Because the National Socialists recognised that a liberal order which was imposed upon Germany by their defeat in World War I. Obviously, there was liberal elements in the German state prior to World War I, but the Germans were obviously unique in Europe, in how much they resisted liberalism.

 

And you can see this in., … And this is the third part of my argument, which is Germany’s unique historical role. Which is that obviously in Western Europe, particularly at that time, you have some major powers. You know, Germany is a major power, France is a major power, Britain’s a major power. And I guess you could say, like the Russians slash Soviet Union. And the Russian slash Soviet Union are kind of like the odd man out in Europe. They kind of got one foot in the door, one foot outside the door. And that’s a complex thing.

 

But in Western Europe, it’s a very kind of cohesive culture in the modern world, where the development of German culture, French culture, British culture, and all the other smaller nations surrounding them, it’s kind of all happening in a kind of collective dance called “modernity”. You know, everyone is listening to each other’s music, reading each other’s philosophers, and Western Europe develops kind of together. Obviously, there’s national differences, but it develops together.

 

And where the British and the French really anchored their political traditions in the Enlightenment and in liberalism, the Germans were far more resistant to it. You know, the Romanticist movement in reaction to the Enlightenment in the late 18th, early 19th century, it was all over Europe, but it was really dominant in Germany.

 

Mark Collett: But Joel you’re giving a great sort of history lesson and sort of justification of National Socialism of the 1920s and 30s. But really what I was asking you is the debate is whether it’s sort of relevant today.

 

Joel Davis: Well, but it is relevant because we live in history.

 

Mark Collett: But I couch this as sort of like every popular nationalist party today takes the two central strands from the National Socialists, and weaves it into what they do, the national and the social. And I just wanted your take on that to whether you think that’s actually what is happening, because if that is happening, then it is undeniably relevant.

 

[23:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think that’s true. But it’s important to understand things dialectically, in other words, that ideas have a history and that ideas work themselves out through trying to actually manifest themselves, particularly when we’re talking about politics in a concrete form, where they start realizing who their friends and enemies are through the process.

 

So obviously, the liberalism of the 18th century is not the same as the liberalism of today. The socialism of the 19th century is not the same as the socialism of today because these movements, as they started trying to concretely realise themselves, had shifting alliances. So liberalism once was allied with nationalism. Now it’s against it. Socialism once anchored itself in the White working class of Europe. Now it anchors itself in, basically Third World immigrants and homosexuals and feminism and so on. And it’s changed a lot of its core commitments. Well, to understand why that is, you have to understand the actual process of history. And so the appeal, …

 

Mark Collett: I think that’s the argument against what you’re saying, Joel, is that, … So there’s several arguments that I didn’t really want to get into this straight away, but I was more sort of hoping you’d discuss how and why it is relevant today. Because I mean Keith’s major argument or one of Keith’s major arguments or one of your major detractors’ arguments is that a history lesson is a great thing and discussing why things were relevant, how they came about, how they grew in that era is fascinating!

 

But we’re in 2025 now, you know, National Socialism sort of burnt in the fires of Germany in 1945 and we’re 80 years on from that now. I was more so looking for your perspective on why it is or why you believe, …

 

Joel Davis: Here’s why it is, Mark, because I’m in, … For example, as an Australian, to make it more concrete, as an Australian, we have obviously a White nationalist tradition. Australia was federated in 1901 under the leadership of a White nationalist movement. Obviously we didn’t rebel against the Crown. In retrospect we probably should have, but we didn’t. I don’t say that because of any kind of anti-Anglo sentiment. Obviously I am an Anglo Saxon.

 

But the reason why I say that is because there were some radical elements in our nationalist movement that wanted to rebel against the Crown and put the White Australia Policy in our constitution. And basically we were watered down quite significantly by the British Parliament in some of the more radical aspects of what one was aimed for by the nationalist movement.

 

But nevertheless the we established the White Australia Policy through legislation and we built a White nationalist country. We had a nationalised banking system, we had a very good government, comparatively speaking, prior to the Second World War in Australia. Noble, good nationalist men. And people say:

 

“Joel, why are you worried about this Hitler stuff? Australia had these great nationalist leaders to begin with. They had a strong, robust White nationalist tradition. Why not just focus on the Australian nationalist tradition? Why even bring in this foreign German stuff?”

 

And the response to that is very simple. The Australian White nationalist tradition, which I do look to and I do admire and I talk about frequently and obviously it’s part of our history, so it would be silly not to. It was fundamentally a liberal tradition!

 

So I don’t believe that we can have a solution to what is the world that we now exist in, which is a world in which liberalism and nationalism have turned against each other and are now enemies, where the project of global liberalism is fundamentally anchored in destroying nationalism and preventing any real nationalism from existing. I don’t believe it’s possible to create a liberal version of nationalism that’s viable. I think we have to accept the reality of where we are in history, that nationalism has to oppose itself to liberalism.

 

And so therefore I have to go and look to historical situations where that happened, where nationalist movements of our counterparts in Europe turned on liberalism and why and what methods they used to then draw inspiration to create a liberal nationalist movement in Australia. Because there wasn’t one in any kind of serious way in our history. We didn’t need one necessarily, because liberalism hadn’t fallen into this crisis of contradiction until the post World War II international order came about through the defeat of National Socialism and liberalism became more self consciously an anti-nationalist project. Where liberalism’s core commitment now is defending basically minority rights and interests against the assertion of the majority will.

 

That is very explicitly the project now. And that’s the, basically the official state policy of my country now. How did that come into being and why? And what do you do about that? What you do about that is you assert the majority will in a direct political form. There is no form more pure, that I can see, in history of doing that than the National Socialists of Germany, where it was a completely totalizing and comprehensive political project anchored in that fundamental principle.

 

And so that’s why I derive not only inspiration from that project, but also why that project needs to be rehabilitated. Because if that project is demonised and is considered this great historical evil, and there isn’t some kind of revisionist process where we can bring those ideas back into the discussion, where we can consider them again in an open way and consider their strengths and weaknesses or whatever, we can’t have that kind of mature discussion about them. We then basically have completely cut ourselves off from being able to form a robust and militant illiberal nationalism that is capable of doing what is necessary, in my view, to save our people.

 

Because I think of only a radical political project is ultimately going to be capable of addressing the great crisis of demographics. You know, the way in which, for example, my country, but this is true for pretty much every country, the way in which we’ve been integrated into this global marketplace and we’ve lost so much of our economic sovereignty in addition to having all these foreigners brought in and our elites are all traitors that are part of an (((international clique))) and the obviously the role of jewish subversion, but not just that Communist subversion and so on.

 

When the National Socialists came to power, they eradicated Marxism, they removed jews from all positions of power. They completely crushed Freemasonry. They wiped out all the enemies of the German people from political life and from public life. They banned foreign owned media, they banned jewish owned media. Only media that was by the German people, for the German people, in the interest of the German people was able to exist.

 

[30:09]

 

 

And so they protected the collective psyche of their people from subversion by alien and hostile foreign elements. That isn’t a liberal idea. That’s an idea nevertheless that I support and is necessary. And a liberal nationalist movement isn’t able to be as totalizing where you could seize state power, where you could use state power to totally crush the enemies of your people and instantiate a positive project of basically developing the blood and quality of the race of your nation in very explicit terms. National Socialism does this. National Socialism also has a intense realism about human nature and the human condition. The reality of struggle, the reality that ultimately to, … Because nationalism is built on this idea of self-determination, right? And you hear a lot of the concept of the so-called Right to self-determination. Apparently liberal world order gives all the nations that make it up, it recognises that they have a right to self-determination, apparently.

 

But it’s an ideological phantasm. You don’t actually have self-determination unless you are powerful enough to assert it. If your right to self-determination is guaranteed by another country, or a set of international alliances that you’re subject to, you’re not actually determining your own destiny. You’re subject to their whims.

 

So you can see the so-called American guarantee of self-determination, it doesn’t really feel very much like self-determination. It gives you the right to essentially have the ideology that the US State Department wants you to have. Which just so happens to correspond with you being soft core genocided in your own country. Nationalist movements being suppressed so that they can’t assert them any kind of independent will from this process and your entire economic and financial system being integrated into an international system that you don’t control, run by foreigners who don’t give a shit about you and exploit you essentially for their own benefit.

 

So that’s why National Socialism needs to be rehabilitated. Because the demonisation of the set of ideas that are bundled underneath National Socialism is a demonisation of a bundle of ideas that need to be applied to create a comprehensive political solution to the problems that are facing us as nationalists today. If we have to cuck ourselves and limit ourselves to only doing nationalism within a liberal framework, we will not create a political movement that is radical or revolutionary enough to achieve the victory that is necessary.

 

Mark Collett: So basically what you’re saying is that the fundamental strands of National Socialism are still relevant today, and more than ever necessary. And by basically disavowing and pretending that’s not the case, we limit ourselves and we actually put a barrier between ourselves and creating the movement you believe we need to win back our freedom. Is that pretty much your point?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Because if you start doing anything that is, or advocating, …

 

Mark Collett: Can I ask a follow up then? Because you see the biggest argument against what you’re saying, and this goes back to what I was saying earlier. I said the BNP was not a National Socialist Party, but at its core were what you could have said were the national and the social. There was the nationalism and the socialism. There was the desire for a homogeneous nation, but there was also a desire to ensure that people work together for the greater good of the community and to treat each other as part of an extended family.

 

So you could say at the core of the BNP’s principles, as you could argue at the core of, say, any nationalist organisation’s principles, are the national and the social. But the BNP believed that by wrapping up those principles in something that was more British, in something that was more relevant, and in something that didn’t come packaged with the baggage of the Second World War, with the baggage of his Hitler, with the baggage of decades of brainwashing, it would be easier to sell.

 

So it wasn’t that the BNP had given up on the ideas, but the BNP believed that by., … And I keep going back to the BNP, because I was involved in the BNP and the BNP were electorally, literally the most successful, openly sort of ethno, … Not the most successful right of the Conservative Party movement by a long way, but the most successful ethno-nationalist organisation in British history. And the people running it believed that that was the best thing to do, to hold on to those central strands, but to repackage them in a way which wasn’t so off putting to normal people. Because, you know, we’re, as I said, we’re in 2025. There’s been 80 years of intense brainwashing, intense social conditioning.

 

And do you think there’s any mileage to taking those central strands, stripping away certain sort of associations and selling sort of nationalism and community in a way that would be less easy to demonise? So say rather than using a swastika, you use the Australian flag. Or rather than putting a picture of Hitler front and centre. You would, if you’re in Britain. You would take British heroes.

 

[35:55]

 

And another thing about this, and this is something which nationalists have always found a barrier, nationalists have always found it very difficult to get past. And I’ve spoken about this very many times. Here in the Anglo-sphere and in Britain especially, there is this sort of foundational myth that came about after the Second World War, that Britain was founded on the idea of opposition to foreign dictators. And the idea that the sort of Britain was this plucky little upstart nation that went around defeating people like Hitler. And that’s when Britain was born. Britain was born out of sort of two World Wars and one World Cup, as ridiculous as it sounds.

 

How do you respond to that allegation? We don’t have much time left. I mean, here in Britain, they’re saying 2066, where White Brits are a minority. White British children could be a minority in schools by 2035, easily, by just past, 20030, if current trends continue as they are today. And people will say:

 

“Well, look, we don’t have much time left. We don’t have time to sort of educate the masses. We don’t have time to break down 80 years of brainwashing and conditioning. We need to take these core fundamentals and repackage them in a way that is more saleable to the man on the street and less likely to scare people away.”

 

How do you respond to that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I would say that’s a distinct issue. Like, my argument is not that everyone needs to package themselves as National Socialists. That was not my argument. My argument was that a project of rehabilitation is necessary so that any illiberal nationalist package that you try to create can have legitimacy.

 

My argument is from the standpoint of ideological purity, which people often use this word purity, or particularly ideological purity, as if it is like a negative thing. And they use the phrase like “purity spiraling”. They say this is a negative thing. Taking your own ideas seriously. It’s not a negative thing. That’s actually an insane position to uphold because basically you’re showing a lack of confidence in your own ideas.

 

We are not going to convert the masses to any ideology because the masses are not ideological! What we can do, however, is convert the radical portion of society, or a very substantial portion of them, people who do want to develop an actual worldview, people who are interested in actually participating concretely in politics, making individual sacrifices towards a political movement. Giving their time, their resources, taking risks with, obviously in our line of work, with potentially running afoul of law enforcement and so on. There’s only a certain subset of the population that is willing to do that kind of thing.

 

But that subset of the population are also the subset of the population that have way more political agency than voters. Right? I don’t build my political strategy around just simply how to appeal to voters. I want to build a political strategy around how do I get that 1% of radical nationalists into a room, fired up and inspired, where they’re willing to run through brick walls for the White race!

 

Because if you have that 1% of the population ready to do that, organised into a serious political movement, then you can show strength to the people. Then you can show something quite impressive to the people and win them over on the basis of:

 

“Look at my 100,000 strong nationalist movement, look at how cool they look in their uniforms.”

 

Or in Britain you can’t wear uniforms. But look at the excellence that we have on display. Look at the fact that we could show the people that we’ve got a real force that can fight for you, that we don’t just have an idea, we’ve got people that are organised around an idea, that are willing to fight for that idea and challenge an elite that you hate.

 

So it becomes a dance, it becomes a story, rather than it being just about the ideas in the abstract. It becomes this concrete group versus that concrete group. And under those conditions, I think it’s a lot easier to win people over to supporting a radical political movement as voters or whatever, when it’s actually material, when they can actually see the leaders, when that movement can actually do concrete things in their community for them, they can meet individuals from that movement. They can see that they have sincerity, they can see that they have a plan for taking down a corrupt government that everyone hates. The legitimacy of the British government or the Australian government is at an all time low. I’ve never experienced this in my lifetime and it’s only getting worse and worse each year.

 

But the thing is that even though pretty much everyone agrees that the establishment is corrupt, that the system is failing, that basically by every metric society is getting worse, they don’t really see an alternative. You need to build an actual horse for them to back. That horse is not going to be built on the basis of the opinions of the masses. The opinions of the masses move last! It needs to be built upon the willpower of a committed radical minority that are happy to be unpopular because they believe in an idea on the basis of principle.

 

And so in order to get win those people over, you actually need to have pure principles! You actually need to have a romantic vision that is built in the essence of what the idea is that they’re going to struggle for. People are not going to go to jail for an optical marketing strategy. People will go to jail, however, for an idea that they truly believe in with their whole heart. So that’s what I’m kind of focused on. When that exists and that, …

 

[41:56]

 

 

Mark Collett: Can I just give you an example of that? I’ll give you an example of that supports your point because I’ve brought up some stuff that’s critical of the things you’ve said, but I’ll give you an example of some things that are actually supportive of what you’ve just said.

 

Now, when I joined the BNP, as I said, most people in it would, especially most activists and leading members would have described themselves as National Socialists. And there was an undercurrent of it in the party. Now, those people would have all gone to the wall for the organisation. They would have all happily gone to jail if they’d have had to.

 

Now, interestingly, as the party became less and less like this, and people like that were increasingly forced out of the organisation, the party did gain more electoral traction and it did become electorally successful.

 

But the interesting thing was the people who were attracted to the party, the sort of soft, fluffy, squishy newbies who didn’t have any affinity to the sort of ideas you’re talking about and were not ideological in any way. Well, the first bump in the road that the party hit, the first bad election, all those people left and bailed. And because there was no hardcore people left in the organisation, there was nobody left in the organisation.

 

You see, throughout all the lean years, throughout all the bad years in the BNP where nothing was happening, there was still a few thousand members. It wasn’t a relevant organisation because you need a lot more than a few thousand members to be relevant. But those few thousand members kept it ticking over and they never left, because they had something that kept them wedded to the movement, this belief in something greater in an ideology.

 

But once you got rid of that hardcore and attracted a bigger, you know, electorally stronger base of less ideological people, the first bump in the road, and all of those were gone.

 

And I do think there is a weight to your argument that an ideological core of people are less likely to be broken and more likely to stick at bringing about what they desire than sort of your soft Johnny come lately, Brexit Party, Australia First voters who will go back to the mainstream at the drop of a hat, at the first, as I say, electoral bump in the road. So I think that’s an important point you just made there is something to be said about sticking to something you believe in.

 

But there’s also something about this which we have to sort of bring up. When you look at what National Socialism was, national Socialism was a very, very ordered, structured, clean movement based around excellence. I think one thing that does put people off National Socialism today is that National Socialism does attract a lot of cranky people. It attracts a lot of weirdos. You know, there were groups in America where you see people walking down the street with swastika flags and they’ve got tattoos all over their face and piercings and gold teeth and stuff like that. I look at that and I see that as a parody of National Socialism.

 

What would you say about some of the weird recreations of National Socialism today? Do you see those as genuine people? Do you see them almost as sort of like Hollywood Nazis attracted to the movement because of a negative stereotype? So they think that if they’re involved with that negative stereotype, they’re the big bad guy and that makes them feel special. Do you think that’s a problem for this as well?

 

Joel Davis: I think maybe historically that has been a problem in various instances. But I would say a few things.

 

Number one, someone doing a bad job of an idea isn’t the repudiation of that idea. It’s just them doing a bad job. The question is, well, what if you did a good job?

 

So, yeah, like, for example, our organisation [NSN], we’re always trying to raise the standards. You have to start somewhere. And that same was true for the NSDAP. They didn’t start where they finished in terms of their aesthetics and their propriety and so on. There was a lot of street thugs in that, in the Hitler was in the streets punching with them, punching on with communists and so on. It did have a pretty rough beginning in many respects. It was a bunch of street thugs that kind of got together, that spurged out over, you know, German nationalist theory at the pub and then went out and started bashing communists in the street. Like [chuckling] that’s one way of describing its origins. There’s more to it than that obviously. But so there is that element.

 

 

Over time, they refined and they became more sophisticated and they grew and they. And so on. And the uniforms got better and obviously very keen interest was paid to the aesthetics of the presentation of the party. And it’s the most distinctive aesthetic style we’ve ever seen in political history, before or after, that still completely captures the imagination of people to this day.

 

So obviously that’s a lot to aspire towards. Hitler himself was literally an artist.

 

 

And so in order to be able to replicate anything of that quality is going to require a lot of work. You can’t just get a bunch of your mates together and pull off NSDAP 2, and think that it’s going to be as good. Right. So it’s a difficult thing to accomplish.

 

And also, we’re not necessarily doing the exact same thing that we’re doing either, because it’s different conditions and so on. In Australia, for example, Australia has certain energies in the national psyche which, which we’re trying to tap into, which is specific to Australia, that maybe don’t resonate with foreigners.

 

[48:20]

 

And part of that is because we’ve got this kind of convict, outlaw mystique in our national identity that subsists, right, where there’s this kind of romantic love of the Kelly Gang* and the Irish kind of convict energy and so on. The kind of rebellion against authority. That’s why Australians have what they call the Tall Poppy syndrome. We like people who are high status to humble themselves and show that they’re one of the people.

 

[* Ned Kelly Australian bushranger (1854–1880) Edward Kelly was an Australian bushranger, outlaw, gang leader, bank robber and convicted police-murderer. One of the last bushrangers, he is known for wearing a suit of bulletproof armour during his final shootout with the police. Kelly was born and raised in rural Victoria, the third of eight children to Irish parents. Wikipedia]

 

We’re not like Americans where we celebrate, like, celebrities and like:

 

“Oh, this guy’s got so much money and status, let’s hero worship him!”

 

Australians are the complete opposite of that. Australians, like the underdog. Australian nationalism was very much built around the worker and the dignity of the Aussie battler* and all of these motifs. And even our kind of wartime mythology is built around these guys just being farmer boys or workers who, hand him a rifle and send him against the Japanese. And he’s like an elite athlete! And it’s like that idea that the average Aussie has actually got incredible or extraordinary qualities, despite having a rough and maybe unsophisticated exterior. That’s kind of part of our, like, national identity.

 

[* Battler, Underdog-Battlers, in Australian colloquialism, are ordinary working-class people who persevere through their commitments despite adversity. Typically, this adversity comprises low pay, family problems, environmental hardships and personal recognition Woes. It is a term of respect and endearment intended to empower and recognise those who feel as though they exist at the bottom of society. Wikipedia]

 

And so, like, we are going to have to tap into that if we’re going to start accessing that. So a little bit of that outlaw esthetic is good for us in our opinion, where foreigners might look at that and go:

 

“Oh, they’re playing into stereotypes.”

 

I don’t think that would work as well. Somewhere like America where they have a completely different culture.

 

For example, in America they admire status, they admire this kind of refined, sophisticated individual who’s the excellent businessman, or the Hollywood, you know, movie star or whatever. They’ve got a whole different national mythology and there’s reasons for that I don’t want to go into.

 

So you’ve got to adapt to your local culture. Obviously you’ve got to tap into the so-called folkish spirit, of your own people and that to do it authentically. And it would be different for Britain, it’d be different for obviously in Germany, it’s different in Australia, it’s different in different countries. But at its core the question is, are you a group that really takes yourselves seriously?

 

Because if you don’t take yourself seriously, then society isn’t going to take you seriously.

 

And I think the issue that a lot of people have had with National Socialists in various instantiations, I’m not going to name any names is that they don’t come across in a way where it seems like they’re even taking themselves seriously. They’re not presenting themselves like:

 

“Could these guys really be an alternative to the current political establishment? Are these guys really capable of governing in any kind of way?”

 

So you have to be able to develop, even if you’re going to have characteristics that differentiate yourselves from the establishment, you have to convey a sense of authority and a sense of seriousness, moral seriousness, political seriousness and so on. That has to come through in how you behave.

 

But again, these are all practical questions. The question is, are the ideas in National Socialism good or not? Like, is it a good idea to remove all jews from positions of power? Is it a good idea to go and like destroy Freemasonry? Is it a good idea to ban Marxists from publicly organising in your country? Is it a good idea to have a racially homogeneous nation? Is it a good idea to try and develop sovereignty not just in, by the word sovereignty, but actually gear the energies of your people towards developing the economic and military means of kind of choosing their own destiny in this world?

 

These are fundamental principles that are in National Socialism, which I think good and I think Australia needs if Australia is going to survive like the White Australian people are going to survive. We’re going to take this continent back and achieve its full potential. That’s why I’m a National Socialist. I believe in those principles.

 

So I think those are good principles. If you come along and said:

 

“Oh well, why don’t you just have all those principles but call it some other name?”

 

I’m fine, I’m fine with someone saying that. I personally, I’m not going to call it another name. But when you do that, you bundle it together and you assign a different name to it. At the end of the day, there’s still going to be a discourse that’s relevant to the Nazis because they’re going to call you a Nazi for doing a bunch of stuff and believing a bunch of stuff that the Nazis believed and did.

 

And so you can spend all of your time saying:

 

“We’re not like the Nazis because, well, actually, …”

 

And write like long TLDR multi-paragraph explanations and how you’re not like the Nazis because of this or that reason. And that’s fine.

 

But at the end of the day, there’s going to need to be some kind of reckoning with the idea:

 

“Well, what’s so bad if we have similarities with the Nazis, Why would we not admire a movement like that as opposed to denigrate it?”

 

Why are we operating under like the morality of the enemy, where we’re kind of implicitly agreeing to this idea that National Socialism is this historical evil that we need to prove that we’ve differentiated ourselves from. That’s not showing strength of character and willpower, I don’t think at all!

 

If we truly believe in our ideas and take them seriously, and we get compared to the Nazis, we should see that as a compliment! Because that was incredibly successful movement that, basically the entire world had to unite together to defeat in the greatest war of all time! Like, that was an incredible expression of political willpower and of taking what was initially a grassroots movement of like 80 guys in a pub sperging out about political theory. It went from that to that. Like, it’s an incredible story! So we should look to it as a form of inspiration.

 

[54:12]

 

 

And if you don’t look to it as a form of inspiration, you’re either lying, or I think there’s something spiritually defective about your nationalism. Because in every sense in which the Nazis were extreme, or to use that label, or were kind of brutal or militaristic, is a respect in which they were simply willing to do more to achieve what was necessary in a certain sense. They took the idea of securing a future for their people. And not just a future, but a powerful and dominant future.

 

And there’s also the secondary aspect of this, which is that what the Germans were fighting for, they were fighting for themselves in the sense they were German nationalists. But what they were fighting for in a historical sense was a different form of Western civilisation, was for a Europe organised around their set of ideas and principles, as opposed to the ideas and principles of the communists or the liberals.

 

And that is this kind of like, great kind of historical Spectre which we now live in. Is Western civilisation going to represent these kind of romantic nationalist ideals? Is it going to represent this kind of you know, in my view, World War II was a metaphysical war between the particular and the universal. Where do you side on that debate? Are you on the side of the particular or on the side of the universal?

 

And to me, I’m on the side of the particular.

 

And I think if the White race doesn’t side with the particular, it will no longer exist. That the collective political, cultural, philosophical and spiritual domination of the White race and our collective culture and civilisation by the universal is fundamentally what is bringing us into this existential confrontation with our own demise.

 

This is even more fundamental to me than the role of jews or anything like that. All of that is a symptom of this more fundamental disease, I believe, of universalism. This metaphysical disease, if you will, where basically our entire moral outlook on the world is relativised into an abstract universal moral framework and has to be justified in those terms, where we can’t just assert ourselves on the basis of ourselves, that we can’t basically measure ourselves by the terms that we create. We can’t create our own values. We can’t assert ourselves as an individual people.

 

Instead, everything has to be:

 

“What are the universal rules of humanity? And how can we devise them in such a way that they’re fair and apply to everyone?”

 

Well, what that is ultimately is a rationalisation of globalism, a rationalisation of a humanitarianism that conquers European particularism and overcodes it with some project of global racial integration.

 

I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe in kind of trying to compromise with that framework. I believe in repudiating that entire position on the metaphysical level with it, with the metaphysical alternative and trying to represent that in my politics. I think if you try and do that in a racist way, they’re going to call you a Nazi and they’re going to be more or less correct. Like you can have an argument against it. But you’re basically doing more or less the same thing in the essence as what the Nazis were doing. So I think you just have to accept it.

 

Mark Collett: So with this argument, I want to add something that people in the chat have been saying, have been sort of watching what the chat’s been saying.

 

Now, I’ll say this. I find it a little bit odd that all of a sudden there has been this sort of attack on people who discuss National Socialism, that call themselves National Socialists. I don’t understand why that is all of a sudden. I don’t. And the reason I don’t understand this is because there seemed to be a period of time where National Socialism became less and less popular. But since 2016, more and more people have been talking about it. And there was an article in the news recently that AI translated Hitler speeches were going viral on TikTok and they were being watched by millions and millions of people. You’ve even had a famous sort of UFC fighter come out recently and started talking about maybe Hitler wasn’t that bad. You had before the last election here in Britain, one of the Reform Party candidates came out and said:

 

“Look, it would have been far better if Britain had allied with Hitler, if we’d never gone to war with Germany. That would have been the best option.”

 

And I see this coming more and more into the mainstream. And I find it odd that as this is becoming more mainstream, just as talking about sort of Zionist, jewish, Israeli influence has become more and more mainstream, there does seem to be some people just out of nowhere saying:

 

“Look, we need to drop this NS stuff. No one should be talking about that. No one should ever be bringing this up, least of all now.”

 

I do find that a bit strange because one thing that I’ve always praised the Left for is tactically, and not because I like any of their ideas, but the Left coexist.

 

[59:52]

 

So you will have the radical Left who coexist with the centre Left, because the centre Left view the radical Left as part of the tug of war. And they see them as the ones at the end of the rope pulling hardest to move the Overton Window in the direction that they need it to go.

 

Whereas on the quote, unquote, “Right”, you have the very opposite. You have the sort of the centre Right, you have more moderate sort of nationalists attacking those to the right of them and saying:

 

“Look we need complete disassociation with these people. We need to rubbish their ideas. We need to bring them down.”

 

And this has gone on for years. But I just find it very strange at the moment that all this would blow up, just as many of the arguments that you make are going more mainstream and people who are either in the mainstream or on mainstream social networks are being exposed to these arguments and many more of them are sort of liking what they see. What do you think caused this sudden sort of group condemnation of these arguments going mainstream from people who are really part of the radical Right? You know, Keith isn’t part of the mainstream Right and neither are many of the people who have criticised this. What do you think led to this criticism?

 

Joel Davis: Well, obviously, like you said, the problem with Conservatives is that they allow the Left, their ostensible apparent enemies, to dictate their standards to them.

 

On the Left, that doesn’t happen. Like Anthony Albanese, who’s the Prime Minister of Australia, the head of the Labour Party right now, he’s a card carrying member of the Communist Party in the 1980s. He was Antifa and like he was literally an Antifa and he was a communist, openly. So conservatives will call him a communist or people on the Right will call him a communist all the time. It doesn’t matter because no one on the Left is canceling him, like:

 

“Oh, we can’t let this communist, this ex-communist run our party.”

 

Can you imagine if it was the other way around and someone was like a National Socialist in the 80s and now they’re trying to run the Conservatives, some conservative party, they’ll be like:

 

“Oh, we can’t allow that to happen because this would be really bad optics.”

 

Well, everyone on the Right just collectively shut the fuck up about it. It wouldn’t be bad optics. In fact, you’d get away with it. The only reason you can’t get away with it is because voices on supposedly outside of politics would criticise it. Not what the Left say. Because the Left call everyone Nazis regardless. They call Peter Dutton a Nazi, they call Donald Trump a Nazi. They call everyone, …

 

Mark Collett: Can I just stop that? You just hit this most important point, right? You just hit the most important point that I didn’t actually bring up.

 

And I just want you to further this because this seems to be another weird thing to attack sort of your ideology at this time, when the term “Nazi” has been more played out than it ever, ever has!

 

 

So right now people are putting up posters all over London of Elon Musk dressed in SS uniform flanked by Farage and Trump saying:

 

“Everyone’s a Nazi!”

 

See in this country, the former sort of Indian conservative establishment of Preeti Patel, Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak, they were called Nazis! And I kind of felt that the term “Nazi” as an insult had lost a lot of its power and that was strengthening the nationalist cause.

 

 

So that’s another weird reason [chuckling] why this has came out. Sorry I butted in there, but you, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s a good point because people on the Right, like only care about what other people on the Right are saying. Unless they’re running the Right, then all of a sudden they start caring about what Left-wingers are saying. But the actual rank and file, the supporters, the Right-wing base does not give a shit about the standards of the Left and does not determine its views on that basis. So if the Right all got together and stopped punching Right, they wouldn’t turn around and go:

 

“Oh, why are all these Nazis getting mainstreamed?”

 

They would just support them.

 

So basically the gate-keeping function of the conservative establishment, it doesn’t just exist on the basis of the fact that a lot of them are jews and obviously subversives, or a lot of them are ex-Leftists and a lot of them are getting paid by big money donors that will stop paying them if they don’t engage in this kind of behaviour. That’s part of it, obviously a big part of it. But another part of it as well is careerism. Is people who want to establish a career on the Right, they need to signal that they’re basically able to work with this establishment. So how can you signal that? Well, the best way to signal that is to be like:

 

“Well, I’m not like them!”

 

And to basically just differentiate yourself, to take a, to pivot to the centre from the radical fringe and differentiate yourself from them in some way, shape or form to be like:

 

“Well, no, I’m not that radical. I’m not really, I’m not a White supremacist. I just I just believe in maintaining a White majority!”

 

Or whatever the case may be, and you’ll use all of these labels and so on to position yourself in a way that apparently make you more mainstream, palpable.

 

But for the average guy in the street, they actually don’t give a shit about the distinction between these terms. These are terms that only matter to political nerds, that only matter to people who work in politics.

 

[1:05:39]

 

So I don’t actually think they’re that important in the grand scheme of things. What is important, however, is the way in which people denominate:

 

“I’m going to stay within this safe box. I’m not going to step outside of this safe box, so you can trust me.”

 

And that’s all part of this deeper gate-keeping function of ideas that are capable of winning. I don’t believe that we can negotiate the policies that we want underneath this moral structure, underneath this institutional structure. I’m a radical, I’m a revolutionary! I believe that the whole thing needs to be challenged.

 

And a lot of people will say:

 

“Yeah, I agree with you, Joel, but challenging the whole thing is going to be too difficult right now. So if we can kind of get within it and we can do a little bit of work breaking down the legitimacy of that box or shifting it gradually further and further to the Right, then we’ll move it into a position where it’ll be easier to attack, where it’ll be weaker, be more exposed to a radical revolutionary attack at some point.”

 

And I say:

 

“Okay, fine, you go and do that project.”

 

But if you’re going to go and do that project, step one is don’t punch Right, then get in there and start punching left. Get in there and start beating up on the Conservatives and calling them out for what they are and refuse to acquiesce to the opposite direction, refuse to acquiesce to the ideological Leftism and so-called cancel culture and all of this kind of shit!

 

Actually go there, in there and do your job. And there’s people that are doing that do try and go into more mainstream discourse and function in that way.

 

And I think most of the time someone like Keith does try and do that. But there’s a lot of people who they’re ultimately putting what will ultimately advantage them and they’ll say:

 

“Hey, look, I am not embracing all these radical and revolutionary ideas. So I can get platformed, I can get, I can build an audience, I’m not getting banned from all these social media companies, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. That proves that this strategy is more effective because I’m not being attacked as much by the enemy.”

 

And it’s like if you’re not being as attacked by the enemy, that means that you’ve compromised! [chuckling] So it’s kind of a ridiculous logic, like the enemy has set the rules up of this game to prevent anything radical enough to actually challenge them from coming into existence.

 

So you’re like:

 

“Hey, look, if I just obey the rules of the game, the enemy doesn’t attack me as hard. My political strategy makes more sense than yours!”

 

Well, that’s basically like conservatism in a nutshell. Like, a lot of the time. It’s just like rationalizing cowardice, rationalizing the path of least resistance, of gaining personal advantage at the expense of creating the actual fundamental conflict between our position and the enemy position, which is ultimately necessary.

 

Like, this has to resolve into a radical polarisation of society where a massive portion of the White men and women of your country, where millions of them are willing to support Nazis or something equivalent to that. How are we going to get there? And if we can’t get there, I don’t believe that we’re ever going to be able to fundamentally have our values imposed upon the state in any meaningful sense.

 

Mark Collett: I’ll tell you what, Joe, I got to agree with you on this bit to a large degree, and I’ve said this to other people. And people got to understand this. If you go out to the public and say:

 

“We want X!”

 

And then people vote for you or don’t vote for you, okay, you know where you stand. Then if people do actually vote you in, you have a mandate to carry out whatever X was.

 

However, if you go to the public and say:

 

“Look, we’re selling X.”

 

And people say:

 

“Well, we don’t want X.”

 

You’re only going to get sort of two and a half percent.

 

And then you say to yourself:

 

“Well, that didn’t work out. Well, let’s water this down, let’s water this down!”

 

And then over time, you start selling something that’s very different, almost completely different to what you sold originally. If, then when you do get to power, or get a whiff of power, you try to do the old switcheroo and say:

 

“Well, you voted for this, but we’re going to give you that thing that you didn’t vote for, what we started off with all the way back then when you rejected us because we were selling product X, but now we’re selling, you know, completely different thing to you at the ballot box. But now we’re in, we’re going to give you the hardcore stuff that you never voted for!”

 

That won’t work. People would be absolutely outraged!

 

And I think that’s something that people don’t understand. I think the issue that you have is that people that have gone down that softly, softly route would find it difficult to do the things that they initially set out to do before they went on the road of watering it down.

 

[1:11:02]

 

 

And I’ll give you a perfect example. Marine Le Pen’s party in France. Well, Marine Le Pen’s party in France have basically stated that if you’ve got a French passport and you love France and you salute the flag, you’re French. Well, once you’ve said that, you’re never going to bring about mass deportations or any form of re-migration because it would be impossible to do you can’t then say to people:

 

“Well, actually, the only people who are French are people who are ethnically French that we now define as White French people.”

 

Because you’ve already given up that ground and people never voted for you for that. People would think that was an awful thing to do you know, probably a lot of your councilors, a lot of your elected officials would be like:

 

“What are you even doing?”

 

And I do think that if you have a radical programme and you ever want to put that radical programme forward and put it into action, you actually have to sell it as what it is if you try to sell it as something different, even if you do manage to get somewhere, you will never be able to get back to where you were and Institute that radical program.

 

So in many ways, Joel, what I’m saying is that I do have a lot of respect for you and the fact that you do have a radical programme and you’re not going to try to water that down because you understand that that wouldn’t work either.

 

And it’s quite funny as well, because every party that I have seen water things down, they haven’t necessarily achieve the success that they wanted to. So another great example of that is the British National Party. It achieved limited electoral success, very limited. Then eventually, when it wasn’t electorally successful, it was destroyed. And really, was it worth selling out on everything it believed in to get there and end up with nothing anyway?

 

So I do think there is a certain honour to standing on a patch of ground, claiming it as your own and being like:

 

“Well, we’ll stand here until the end, and if we win, we win. If we don’t. But if we win, we’re winning on our own merits.”

 

Joel Davis: And even for the people who want to water things down, my view is that if you want to, you need to maintain a kind of radical leadership. You need to have it at the very least within the Right-wing. You want the Right-wing base and people who are in Right-wing politics in every respect to have the maximum amount of rightward pressure, particularly obviously on the issues of race and related issues.

 

So basically you want to have a discussion that doesn’t have rules that disclude the Nazi. Why do people oppose the Nazis? They don’t oppose the Nazis or they don’t get freaked out by the Nazis because of what is Keith writing about, like how they treated Slavic people or something? Maybe if you’re in Poland, that’s the case, but in our, in the English speaking world, that isn’t what’s going on.

 

Mark Collett: I don’t follow Keith’s argument there because I’ve been involved in nationalism for a long time, and do you know how many Polish people I know that have attended events that could and would be described as National Socialist events? I’ve never found that really. I think that’s enough.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but sure, I’m not, I’m just saying that from the perspective of the English speaking world, that’s not what the controversy is built in the controversy fundamentally oscillates around the notion that the Nazis were the ultimate anti-semitic racist political force. And the other stigma, I guess, is to do with the authoritarian style of governance. Right. And that basically is where the stigma comes from.

 

So do you want a Right-wing that is willing to basically seize state power and use it against their enemies in a way that goes beyond the limits set for it by liberalism? Do you want a Right-wing that is radically racist? Do you want a Right-wing that is radically anti-semitic? Well, if you want these things, then you have to take the kind of moral training wheels off and allow us into the discourse and allow us to pressure the discourse in our direction. That’s the only way this is going to work. You’re not going to be able to cancel Nazis and also achieve those ends. Then at the very least, you’re undermining those efforts at the very least, because you’re creating the opposite pressure system.

 

But anyway, the other point that is often made around these subjects is that:

 

“Oh, well, the thing is that White people don’t consider genocide to be moral and they get freaked out by militarism.”

 

Was the term that Greg Johnson used after the stream the other night:

 

“It scares the hoes. Being a Nazi scares the hoes!”

 

And my response to that is obviously, huh?

 

Mark Collett: Who are the hoes?

 

Joel Davis: It’s a phrase like “scaring the hoes”. You never heard that before?

 

Mark Collett: No, mate, we say it’s like “spooks the cattle” or something like that. We’re British here, we don’t use words like “hoes”.

 

Joel Davis: Okay, well, it’s a funny phrase anyway.

 

Mark Collett: Gardening. A hoe is a gardening tool, my friend. It is not a we’re not in the ghetto tonight. [chuckling]

 

[1:16:52]

 

Joel Davis: But anyway. Yeah, but what my response to Greg was that:

 

“Well, there’s not going to be any non-hoe scaring solution to this.”

 

Like, we’re talking about an existential battle for the survival of our race. Taking on the entire political establishment, taking on the people who run the world and defeating them. It’s going to require militancy, it’s going to require aggression!

 

And if you don’t have that, you actually don’t have a basis for people who actually believe in you! Because you’re not actually projecting a sense of power or authority, or a fighting spirit. That’s what’s necessary.

 

If all you are a bunch of nerds in suits with ideas and with arguments, well, that isn’t actually the foundation of power. Like, you need to have good arguments. You need to be well presented. What you also need to have is a willingness to fight, a willingness to struggle, a willingness to suffer, a willingness to make sacrifices, and an aggression!

 

And you need to have a that needs to be rooted in what is fundamentally a confrontation with existential reality.

 

The problem that White people face most fundamentally is not that they don’t have the right ideas. It’s that they’re too cowardly to even come to the obvious conclusion. Because the obvious conclusion has very scary ramifications. If you accept the fact that we are ruled by traitors and hostile alien elements that hate us and want us dead as a people, that are purposefully executing a plan to eradicate our race from existence, and that basically there’s nobody in politics that really has our back, and that we have to build a grassroots movement from scratch under a hostile government to overthrow and resist it to the point that we can regain our existence. If you have to accept that reality, which is the reality, if you don’t accept that’s reality, you’re wrong. That’s the reality.

 

If you’re going to accept that you live in that world. That’s a scary world! That’s a very scary world to live in. That’s not something that makes you feel good. Right.

 

And so it feels a lot better to believe that isn’t necessarily the case, that actually:

 

“Oh, we just need to win the argument. Oh, we just need a better marketing strategy or whatever.”

 

Particularly if you’re a weak cunt, like if you’re a low testosterone male, you are going to be less likely to be able to accept reality because you are biologically predisposed to being more of a herd animal. You’re more afraid of standing against the collective, you’re more afraid of conflict, you’re more conflict avoidant.

 

And so you’re going to naturally psychologically bias towards a conflict avoidant strategy. And a sense of reality where:

 

“Oh, these people just aren’t making the right arguments! If you just made the right arguments, if you just said the correct assembly of words like what I say, then the people that hate us would be defeated in the battleground of ideas and we would win!”

 

No, no, no! The problem is that White people aren’t fucking fighting back! The problem is that our race are a bunch of pussies! Fundamentally! That every single day, millions of White people around the world make the decision to turn the blind eye, to take the paycheck, to keep their head down because they don’t want to pay the costs of sticking their head up and resisting. That’s why we’re in this fucking position! So many of our ancestors took the jew money or they, as I said, they basically let an insult on their honour occur and just let it happen. They didn’t react! And a whole series of those decisions were made again and again and again and again, to we get here!

 

So that’s why we’re in the position that we’re in. It’s our own fucking fault! It’s our own weakness fundamentally. It’s not because White people haven’t been convinced that it’s moral necessarily for them to continue existing.

 

The reality is that most White people like existing and don’t really like immigration and so on. It’s that they’re too scared to come to the conclusions that that implies. You know, so that’s what we need a movement that inspires people to have courage. It inspires people to express honour, that galvanises people and provides solidarity. Where if, okay, maybe when you’re the only guy that’s kind of standing up, that’s more scary, but if you’re standing up and you’re surrounded by brothers who are organised at scale, standing up beside you have a lot more confidence to stand up.

 

So it’s about how do we bring confidence back to the White man? How do we deal with this White demoralisation? How do, how do we deal with this White cowardice? To me, that’s what the movement is fundamentally about, in a kind of spiritual and cultural sense. It’s not about how do we have the best argument why mass immigration sucks! We’ve already won all those fucking arguments! The majority of people are against mass immigration. Everyone can see the society is failing. The current system has never been this illegitimate.

 

It’s not a question of arguments anymore, in my view, or it never was. It’s about creating a psychological and spiritual state to actually receive the world view and act on the worldview. And I would say I would finish with this as well. There are millions of Australians that have White nationalist or White nationalist adjacent views. How many of them do anything about it? That’s the issue! Is that they’re not actually fucking doing anything! It doesn’t matter that they’ve been convinced. If you convince someone the jews are running the media and running the banks and the White race is being replaced and they go:

 

“Yeah, that makes sense. I can see that.”

 

And then they just go back to work the next day and then turn the football on, and take the Mrs on a holiday and send their 2.3 [1.3] kids to the local school and they just continue on watching reality TV shows.

 

And what does it matter what they think in their brain? It’s not actually actualizing into a different way of life. It’s not turning into political resistance.

 

So everyone wants to convince these passive voters that maybe we’ll vote for a nationalist party if it was marketed to them in the right way under certain conditions. I want to appeal to people who are like:

 

“Hey, come and join me in the struggle for our existence. Devote your life to it!”

 

That’s what I’m doing. That’s what we actually need. I need fucking voters. I don’t need opinions. I need fighters. We need fighters!

 

[1:23:38]

 

Mark Collett: I mean, obviously by “fighters” you mean political fighters. People who are going to do things lawfully.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Anyway, look, let’s do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet and you want to do the Superchat, please do you can donate via Odysee or Entropy. We’ll be reading all those out now. We’ve got about 35 minutes left. The first Superchat is one that was sent to me by a guy called SR, who gave $30. Thank you so much! And it’s something I wanted to raise first and separately with you, Joel, because I do have one disagreement with you on this.

 

You do talk about National Socialism a lot and about your belief system, which I respect. But one thing you seem very down on is working with other ethnic groups who are also National Socialists. Now I’ve always seen National Socialism as a movement.

 

Joel Davis: You mean non-Whites. Obviously I support working with other White ethnic groups. Obviously.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, you don’t support working with non-White or other ethnic groups that are National Socialists. Now one thing, I’ve always found this a little bit strange because people like Hitler, George Lincoln, Rockwell, they obviously did. And I firmly believe that we should work with other ethnic groups that want peaceful separation.

 

And I also believe that if you look at National Socialism fundamental strands that I opened the show discussing, where I said there’s the national and there is the social, that does apply to everybody.

 

So if you went to say a country in the Middle East or you know, a country in the Far East, and those people wanted a homogeneous, closed bordered society where their people worked hand in hand to do the best for them and obviously accept expressed their culture. You see, and I think people like sort of David Duke, Kevin MacDonald, many others would agree with me when I say this, that really we do want a multicultural world, but we just want everyone in their own place, in their own homelands. And we want sort of a world of independent, proud people that celebrate their own cultures. We just don’t want all of that on our soil.

 

Obviously we do have a time limit tonight. I’m sure you and I could debate this all night long, but I do think it’s kind of slightly antithetical to sort of National Socialism as an ideology to oppose other ethnic groups that agree with that agree sort of with the idea of peaceful separation and that everyone should have their own place in the world.

 

Joel Davis: And my position has never been that we can’t have good relations with non-White countries.

 

Like for example, Australia has a very strong military alliance with Japan. After the United States, they’re probably our second most important military ally because of the fact that we share a region and various other reasons. And I wholeheartedly support that and I actually respect Japanese culture as well in many respects. But even if I didn’t, from a practical standpoint, that’s what’s in Australia’s interests, is to have a strong alliance with Japan. Well, obviously, once great enemies, we fought World War II against each other, but now that’s how I see it.

 

So I’m not opposed to that on the basis of like some kind of trivial racism. But within Australian politics or within the politics of any White country, what is fundamentally awry with Whites is that Whites can’t figure out how to do anything themselves. Like, just yesterday I went to a Celtic festival, right? It was celebrating Scottish and Irish culture, obviously the weekend after St. Patrick’s Day. Maybe that’s why they organised it. It was more Scottish than Irish, this particular festival. And the kilts were on and bagpipes were going. They’re doing Scottish strongman competitions and things like that.

 

Anyway, I’m watching the bagpipes and there’s these dudes that are like:

 

“Oh, I really value my Scottish ancestry. And I got the whole regalia with the long socks and I’ve learnt how to play bagpipes. I’m in this bagpipe playing collective or whatever, and we’re marching around in time playing bagpipes.”

 

And then he walks over to his Asian girlfriend or wife or something. And it’s like, so that’s how important your Scottish ancestry is to you, is it, mate? And then I see like a fucking Indian guy next to him with the bagpipe looking, like completely out of place next to all these like ginger dudes and stuff.

 

And it’s like, what the fuck are we doing here? Can we just have fucking bagpipes? No, we can’t have bagpipes! We’ve got to share the fucking bagpipes on the Celtic festival day with fucking Indians! Like, White people need to have our own shit!

 

We need to have in particular our own political representation where it’s just for us! We can’t have a political party or we can’t have a political lobby group or some kind of political representation if we can’t even have that, where it’s just for us. How the fuck are we going to have a country just for us? That’s step one! We should be able to have an organisation where only we can be apart and everyone else, too fucking bad! You’re not involved. This is for us, it’s not for you. If we can’t be exclusionary on some level, how are we going to build an exclusionary politics? It doesn’t make any sense.

 

[1:28:58]

 

 

Now, that doesn’t mean that, as I said, non-White groups in other countries we can’t have a peaceful amicable relationship. But if they’re in another country, they can’t really do that much to help us on a domestic level, they really can’t. When we seize state power or something, then we can have an amicable relationship.

 

But in the process of our domestic political scenario, all that’s relevant is can we get White people organised at scale? That’s all that’s actually relevant. If we can take the country back. If we can’t take the country back. Everything else is a fucking distraction! If we’ve got, if we can only organise like a tiny portion of Whites and we’re going and wasting our time going and meeting with like some random group of Muslims and some random group of blacks and so on that are completely irrelevant to our struggle, it’s like, what are we fucking doing here? We should be going out and meeting with Whites. We should be going out and working and building up White communities, talking to Whites, converting Whites to our worldview, organising Whites into our organisation.

 

White power is the name of the fucking game. This is a movement for self-determination! That means it’s a movement that we, where we are determining our own destiny has to come from our strength. And if White people are constantly looking to non-Whites for help or for solutions and being inclusive towards them, it’s just reproducing the same fundamental problem., …

 

Mark Collett: I think you’re misrepresenting the argument. It’s not about being inclusive. You’re sort of getting very worked up about inclusivity and things like that it’s not about being inclusive.

 

I’ll tell you this now, Joel, and this is a fact, right? I could introduce you to a hundred Whites, okay, and you could explain your belief of National Socialism, what you think it is, and try and sell it to them. And then I could sit you with a hundred, say, blacks or Asians, and you could explain the same. And I bet per capita you’d get more ethnic minorities saying that’s a reasonable argument than you would with Whites.

 

And I’ll tell you this now, and this might be a hard pill to swallow, but I’ve gone and met black people who’ve invited me on their podcasts. I’ve discussed things with people from other groups and cultures. And when they talk to me, they never call me a Nazi or they never like have a go at me. When they inquire about our views, they are genuinely interested to hear what we say. And often the most pushback I get and the most screeching of the word “Nazi” is actually from brainwashed Whites.

 

And I’m not saying this because I want to get in this debate now. I mean, I’d love to do a debate with you on this at some time. [chuckling] It might be fun if people want that, you know. But what I’m saying, …

 

Joel Davis: Mark, I’ve met heaps of non-Whites and I say this stuff and I’ve been pretty consistent about this. I literally go on my stream and say:

 

“If you’re non-White, turn the stream off. I don’t want you watching my streams. Get out of the live chat!”

 

They still do it. They still do it, right? So it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter how racist I get. There’s still a bunch of non-Whites that are like:

 

“This White guy is cooking!”

 

So what? What are they going to do to help?

 

Mark Collett: Joel, I think what you’re saying here is also antithetical to your cause, and I’ll tell you why. When I’ve seen the National Socialists, they were impeccably well dressed, very well spoken, very, very polite and they wouldn’t address people in that manner.

 

And I think in selling what you’re trying to sell, taking the kind of David Duke road is the better route. Now I think if you look at David Duke, he’s probably, well, he is the most famous and prominent post-war White nationalist, you know, post the man with the mustache. Duke is the big man! And I don’t think anyone has been more popular amongst Arabs, amongst different White ethnic groups and even amongst blacks than David Duke. David Duke is somebody who’s respected by people of different racial groups all over the world for what he pushes.

 

And I think that’s more, … When I first got involved with the BNP there was this heavy National Socialist undercurrent in the organisation. But everybody there saw, they didn’t see non-Whites as just a simple sort of like enemy. And I think that’s a counterpoint., …

 

Joel Davis: I’m not saying, but I’m not saying that they’re all enemies. What I’m saying is that I want to have a space where White people organise our own politics amongst ourselves.

 

Mark Collett: And I’m not saying you shouldn’t have that.

 

Joel Davis: I’m trying to practice, I’m just trying to practice my ideas. Because [words unclear] they’re not part of it.

 

Mark Collett: The Superchat was more about working with people.

 

And when I see people like George Lincoln, Rockwell who work with Nation of Islam and stuff. I’ve always seen National Socialism as a movement that will work with people from other ethnic groups as long as they are ideologically coherent.

 

Joel Davis: What ones that live in our countries?

 

Mark Collett: Well, the fact is, the way we are, the way it is now is, unfortunately, there is a reality to this.

 

Joel Davis: If they support us, if they really support us, they wouldn’t live in our countries. They just move home. It’s not that fucking hard!

 

[1:34:46]

 

Mark Collett: I don’t think it’s as simple as that.

 

And I think one of the things that we would have to do moving forward if we were to get to a position where we held real power and real sway amongst the Whites in our nation is you would need to sit down with people from other ethnic groups and plot a way to chart peaceful separation. Because it ain’t gonna be a matter of, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. When we’ve got a serious amount of Whites organised and we have a serious political movement and we actually have strength and we actually can say we speak on behalf of Whites because we’ve got enough support and we got a chance of taking political power, then we can sit down with these groups and try and work out how we can send them back in a way that’s reasonable for everyone. But why are we doing it now? Just a complete waste of time right now. We’re not anywhere near that position where that becomes relevant.

 

What we need to be focusing upon now is ourselves and getting ourselves organised and creating spaces where White people can talk about what’s in White interests amongst ourselves, where everyone else is excluded. We’ll let you know when we’re ready to have a chat. Is my view.

 

Mark Collett: You know, it was interesting because before the Syrian government fell in Syria, I actually did a stream with one of the with one of the very influential men from the Syrian government, and he agreed overwhelmingly with the points that we were making and said:

 

“Look you should be sending back all the Syrians that came to your country.”

 

He said that. And I do think that politeness and a willingness to sort of work with other people who want peaceful separation is far more in line historically with what National Socialism was.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not saying we should be impolite. I don’t think it’s just, …

 

Mark Collett: Otherwise, you just become sort of this like pastiche of National Socialism where you’re walking down the street with your tattoos on your face and your bother boots on and you’re shouting at people and it’s basically all you expect at that point is Steven Spielberg to pop out from a lamp post and shout:

 

“Lights, camera, action!”

 

And it goes on the TV and it’s kind of like negative reinforcement of what, …

 

 

Joel Davis: It’s not negative. My worldview is very simple. I believe White people collectively have the strength to control our own destinies. And all that is required is for us to have the self consciousness and strength of will to do. So that’s my message. We don’t actually need any of these other groups’ help. We actually don’t need their help. That doesn’t mean that I want to kill them all. We don’t need their help. We need our own help!

 

So when we start helping ourselves and we get strong, then from a position of strength we can sit down at the table and try and work out and negotiate, what’s ours and what isn’t ours with these other groups. But we’re not in a position to sit down and have that negotiation yet.

 

So it’s an utterly pointless waste of time and a lot of energy. I’ve seen this from people like, I don’t want to name names. I know that for example, Lucas Gage is kind of, we had debates like this back in the day and he’s kind of recognised like a shift in strategy is needed to a large extent. But all this energy went into trying to convince all these non-Whites that jews are the real enemy, not Whites and they should ally with us and so on. And it all amounts to nothing.

 

Because at the end of the day, they have their own people, they have their own perspective, they have their own concerns. And if they were more concerned about us than their own people, there’d have to be something wrong with them.

 

So there’s no point sitting down and negotiating with them from position of:

 

“Empathize with us! Poor Whitey. We need, …”

 

Like that’s fundamentally weak and it’s ridiculous! We want to develop strength!

 

And then we can sit down from a position of strength and say, these are our interests. Here’s the benefits of cooperating with us and going along with us. And here’s what happens if you don’t cooperate with us. What would you like to do? And we can sit down as gentlemen and be very rational about it and very gentlemanly and everyone can wear suits and shake hands and no one’s calling each other names. That’s what I want to do.

 

But I see so much time wasted in this movement from banging on about how we stand with the Palestinians and we stand with the Syrians and obviously we oppose Israel, we don’t want to support Israel, the parasite that is Israel and zionism.

 

But at the same time I actually, it’s kind of their problem at the end of the day, that’s their side of the world. I care about my countries or our countries, I care about our people and securing our future. That’s what I’m focused on. I’m not focused upon giving all of this moral and emotional energy to non-Whites. That is really the problem with Whites. We’ve given way too much moral and emotional energy to others and nowhere near enough to ourselves! I am the person that comes along and says:

 

“That’s fundamentally wrong! I’m going to have a pure version of my worldview and express it to you.”

 

Because I fundamentally have confidence in our own race. I don’t think we need anybody else, we don’t need anybody else to achieve what is necessary. If we get Whites organised in Australia at scale, we take Australia back. Same thing in Britain, same thing everywhere else.

 

[1:40:16]

 

Mark Collett: I’ll say this. I’ll say this right, I respect your optimism, but this is where I fear that you’re going wrong, in that you said something there about sort of, who cares about the Israeli issue, who cares about this? I’ll tell you this now, if you don’t cut the strings on your puppet politicians that are all dancing to the Israeli tune because that’s who hold the strings is Israel, then you’re never ever going to be free.

 

And one of the things, one of the reasons why I thought this was an interesting debate tonight is because the vast majority of people who are, I’m not saying all, but the vast majority of people who are antithetical to everything you’re saying, who are opposed to everything that you are, Joel, are busy cucking on this issue whilst all sucking up to the Zionists!

 

And you know why I believe that you were kicked off TwitterX It wasn’t because, you’re pro-White, it’s because you’re NS and that’s the step they don’t want to allow. It’s because you weren’t one of the people saying:

 

“We’ll look, if we just get rid of the Muslims and treat them really badly and shout rude words at them, everything will be fixed. Hey!”

 

Which is what the people on Twitter and X say in abundance. And I’m just saying I’m not saying that we need to be friends with everyone, but the fact is most, most, …

 

Joel Davis: I’ve talked to non-Whites before. I’ve had plenty of amicable chats with non-Whites who are woke on the jews or whatever.

 

But what I’m saying is I don’t think you can really build a politics out of these conversations. The politics that we can build is White people coming together for White interests. That’s the politics I believe in.

 

So that’s the name of the game!

 

And I think too much energy gets wasted if you deviate from that too far. That doesn’t mean, it doesn’t mean being rude to non-Whites, particularly ones that are sympathetic. I’ve met sympathetic Asians, blacks, Arabs, whatever. And I don’t call them slurs and like punch them in the face or something. I’m a supreme gentleman. But they’re not coming to the NSN rally. [chuckling] You know, they’re not coming to the, …

 

Mark Collett: I’m not asking that, but the reason you’re not on, if you look at the groups that have been banned off X, if you look at the individuals that have been banned off X, they’re all people that went beyond what is the confirmed and allowed parameters. And the confirmed and allowed parameters on that godforsaken platform, are that ultimately you can be pro-your own country as long as you’re pro-your country being ruled by Zionists in Israel. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yes, of course.

 

Mark Collett: And by taking the stance you took, … You see the problem with NS and what they feel fear about National Socialism is National Socialism by its very definition is anti-being ruled by Israel. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Of course.

 

Mark Collett: It’s anti-being ruled by anybody that is from another group.

 

And the fact is they don’t mind on X now, if you advocate for sort of a White America, or a White Britain, a as long as that White America or largely White Britain is still being ruled by a little fiefdom in the Middle East.

 

Joel Davis: But they also don’t mind if you advocate for Palestine like a Leftist, on the basis of the poor Palestinians and look at what’s happening to them.

 

The distinction between my view is that I oppose Israel and zionism not on the basis of sympathy with Palestinians, but on the basis of asserting White interests. We gain absolutely nothing from Israel! We gain absolutely nothing from our support of zionism! And we, our entire political system has been hijacked by it. How much blood and treasure have we expended in invading Iraq and all this other nonsense that has absolutely zero benefit to us? And Zionists control the media. Zionists control the political process, even in Australia.

 

So I speak about it from the basis of Australian interests, White interests, not from the perspective of sympathy with Palestine or Syria. Because the thing is, number one, that’s the fundamentally wrong orientation. We should be relativizing everything in politics towards what’s good for us. That’s nationalism.

 

Number two, also there’s another idea which is that:

 

“Well, yeah, we don’t really care about Palestine or we don’t really care about Syrians, but we should pretend to because at the moment it’s going to cause problems for jews, right? So we should pretend to?”

 

And my response to that is not only do I dislike playing games, like manipulative games, I believe in authenticity. But number two, the average patriotic White guy that I know, doesn’t give a shit about fucking Palestine or Syrians. They don’t like Muslims in general.

 

And so if I start positioning myself like a Leftist, pretending that I care about these things, they’re actually going to get turned off and I’m actually pushing them into the arms of the Tommy Robinsons of the, …

 

Mark Collett: Joel! Joel! Right, you see, this is where, if you don’t mind me saying, your argument kind of falls to pieces.

 

Because if you’re saying you can’t take a principled stand over Palestinian children being killed because it might turn off Grug nationalists, well, you know what also turns off Grug nationalists? Hitler and swastikas. So if now we’re trying to appeal to the Grug nationalists with:

 

“Well, let the Israelis bomb Palestinian schools, I’m not going to say anything about that.”

 

You might as well drop your Swazi and your NS stuff as well because that also turns off Grug nationalists.

 

[1:46:25]

 

 

Joel Davis: Not really. What I’m saying is that what the perspective that they haven’t heard, what they’ve heard is “fuck Muslims” on one side and then on the other side “it’s a jew Muslim dispute and should we sympathize with the jews or should we sympathize with the Muslims?” I’m coming along with the Third Position of “let’s sympathize with ourselves”. We don’t have to pick jew or Muslim. We can pick us! And that is the correct position. Right? Because fundamentally it’s a movement for us. We’re not a Muslim movement, not a jewish movement. We’re a movement for White people. So I’m coming along with that position and saying:

 

“Well, let’s get outside of that false dichotomy. Let’s take our own side here.”

 

That’s actually a very compelling message that has a lot of appeal, I think, actually.

 

And it’s important to deal with the anti-Muslim, pro-jewish element on the Right, which we’re directly competing with, in particular.

 

Thirdly, it’s actually what I really believe. None of us are willing to go. Maybe some people are idiotic enough to be doing to do this, I don’t know. But pretty much none of us are willing to actually go and fight for any of these Muslim countries in their struggles of national independence or contribute anything really of that much significance beyond firing off a few tweets of moral support.

 

However, we’re willing to fight and die for our countries. So let’s just be honest here! Let’s just be honest here and just, and talk about it in terms of our interests and in our nation. We don’t need to go and adjudicate genocides on the other side of the planet. Is everyone getting that passionate about the morality of the Rwandan genocide or what the Azerbaijanis are doing to the Armenians or what the Chinese are doing to the Uyghurs? No! No one’s getting that passionate about any of that. You’re pretending to care about the Palestinians because you hate jews, which is, I understand it, that’s fine, that’s great! But on a certain level. But on another level, it’s like, let’s be real here. We don’t actually give a shit about Palestinians. We actually don’t. We’re just pretending to, because we don’t like Israel.

 

So why don’t we just talk about the real reasons why we don’t like Israel, the pro-White reasons, and just cut the bullshit!

 

Mark Collett: Well, I don’t think it is bullshit! I think, having a decent, rounded worldview is part of the National Socialist mindset. I think part of the National Socialist mindset historically was having a rounded worldview. And all I’m saying is that I don’t want to see my people genocided. I don’t want to see millions of people coming here from all over the world and wiping out indigenous Brits. But nor do I want to see Israeli jets wiping out Palestinians, and nor do I want to see Israel destabilising the Middle East for the 20th time and millions more Muslims pouring out of the Middle East into countries like Britain, Germany, and France!

 

Joel Davis: But it wasn’t Israel doing it, you wouldn’t care, Mark. Like, if it was Egypt doing it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, of course I’d care if it was anyone doing it. And it’s creating an endless stream of people who are then funneled into Europe. I don’t want it happening. You see, I don’t want Western countries selling weapons to Africa so that they destabilise their countries and then all the people coming flowing here. What you want is a world where there are defined borders, people have a place in the world. And you’re constantly not kicking hornets nests. Because those hornets nests, when they’re kicked, it’s our kids that end up getting stung.

 

And fundamentally I think that when I see what jews do, and to say that I don’t care who does its completely wrong! You know, if you look at my history, my political history, I oppose the war in Iraq. I oppose the war in Afghanistan. I opposed American invasions of numerous countries. Why? Because I think all of this is part of sort of a wider, sort of globalist, internationalist agenda, which isn’t good for White people either. You know, ultimately the most important thing is what is good for White people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Good for White people. That’s why we should oppose on the basis of its bad for us, rather than going on about, …

 

Mark Collett: But Israel’s dominance in the Middle East is bad for White people!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree. We’re not disagreeing about opposing Israel, obviously. What are the reasons? Like, how are we framing it? You know, I just believe in framing things.

 

Mark Collett: It’s bad for White people. Because if you, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But that’s what I’m saying. Bang on about the poor Palestinians all the time. I’m not saying you do this.

 

Mark Collett: No. What was the first thing that Israel demanded when they wanted to empty the whole of Gaza?

 

The first thing they did was meet people like Tony Blair and talk about sending 2 million Palestinians to Europe. It’d be disastrous! We’re on the knife edge. Why would you want any more of them here? You know, I oppose Israel’s dominance in the Middle East. It’s bad for White people.

 

But I also don’t like seeing pictures of Palestinian babies with their limbs blown off. As a father, that sickens me! And people who can do that are just demonic! There is that aspect.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay, but like I’m, …

 

Mark Collett: But I don’t want to go around seeing children blown to pieces by sort of demonic warmongering Zionists who think it’s hilarious and then want to sell up the little bit of land that they used to have to build condos on so Trump and his stupid son-in-law can rub their greedy hands and make another real estate deal.

 

[1:52:20]

 

Joel Davis: I mean that’s all fine and reasonable, but nevertheless, I think you can also see what I’m saying here, which is that I think we need to anchor our politics just fundamentally in ourselves and our own interests. And what are we actually concretely willing to fight for, and not. Because there’s been this attitude that’s been too pervasive of this world police attitude where we’ve got to morally dictate to all of these non-White countries what they’re like, how their political systems need to be structured, which is a way to anchor us into these foreign conflicts. And I know you’re opposing things. I know you’re taking the opposite view to the Americans.

 

Mark Collett: You are totally wrong in what you’re saying.

 

Joel Davis: What?

 

Mark Collett: The whole world police mentality comes from Israel. The whole world police., …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: We had two wars with Iraq, with the globalist American system run by Israel being the world police! I’m not saying we need to be the world police. I’m saying we need to morally oppose foreign invasions, …

 

Joel Davis: But the Left-wing, Right-wing distinction in the mainstream has been either you sympathize with this set of foreign victims or this set of foreign victims. Like we ought to take its side in these, in all of these foreign conflicts where there’s one side that the Leftists like and one side that the Zionists like. And then it flips back and forth between who we’re supporting and it’s like:

 

“You know what? Fuck all this bullshit! Australia first, America First, whatever, right?”

 

Our military and our, and our money and our blood should be expended when we are attacked, when our people are attacked to defend us and nothing else! That is what we need to say, …

 

Mark Collett: No, you just said screw the world police mentality. The world police mentality is the globalist Zionist mentality where White soldiers are used to go to places like Iraq where they either die, come back with some kind of PTSD, or their legs and arms missing to serve the Zionist agenda.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t want to become like some communist foreign policy where we just have the foreign policy of the Soviet Union, if it still existed or something, and we just, whatever the brown people that the Zionist Americans support, we support the other group of brown people and we play all these like team sports and waving all these weird foreign flags from countries don’t even understand the language of it just becomes utterly contrived and alienating.

 

And it’s also disingenuous. We don’t actually give a shit, on a fundamental level. We’re not willing to go and fight for it like we are for our own country. So why can’t we just anchor it in nationalism, and ourselves?

 

Mark Collett: But what are you talking about?

 

Joel Davis: Ike that’s a way better approach.

 

Mark Collett: What I’m saying is nationalism is a non-Aggression. We anchor what we’re doing in what’s best for us. What’s best for us isn’t going out and being the global police for the Zionist state of Israel.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s also not investing all of your emotional energy in the plight of other foreign peoples that are the victims in these narratives either. We’ve got to invest our emotional energy and our advocacy in our own people.

 

And that means like you only have a certain amount of care, you only have a certain amount of love you can feel as a human being. You have a finite amount of energy. I believe in investing 100% of that in ourselves. That is going to secure our future.

 

Mark Collett: What bit of not investing time and energy in ourselves is being supportive of these wars? Opposing these foreign wars is being supportive of White people, because we are the ones who pay for them.

 

Joel Davis: I’m saying I oppose the wars. I’m just saying I should oppose them. The reasons that we list, we should just list pro-White reasons. That’s all I’m saying. We should oppose them from a pro-White perspective. That’s all I’m saying.

 

Mark Collett: So at no point in your world do you look at those Palestinian kids being blown to pieces and think:

 

“Well, that’s also another good reason to oppose it.”

 

You know, seeing babies have their limbs blown off, that’s not a good reason as well. I mean I’ve said like it’s bad because we pay for.

 

Joel Davis: That’s just kind of like an emotional thing. Like I tried to look at things in a very rational way. Like at the end of the day horrible things happen all over the world all the time. I can’t care about all of them. I have to decide what I care about what I don’t care about. Even though there’s horrible things, it’s like:

 

“Wow, if that was me, that would be horrible!”

 

Like you can empathize, but at the end of the day, I don’t consider the plight of the Palestinian people to be my problem. I’m not Muslim, I’m not Palestinian, they’re not my people. I care about my people.

 

So I wouldn’t be willing to go and do anything about it in a direct sense. I would be willing to do something about it in the sense of opposing Israel on the basis of liberating our people from the yoke of their occupational influence over our government institutions. I obviously completely oppose supporting Israel in every possible conceivable direction.

 

[1:57:31]

 

 

And actually if we just cut Israel off from a pro-White perspective in our countries and let the Muslims have their way with them, and sit back with the popcorn and enjoy the destruction of Israel, obviously. Right? Because that’s what would happen. They only exist because of their parasitism upon us, because we defend them. If we remove our security guarantees and stop giving them money and weapons and sending our people to go and fight in wars for them, they’re fucked! So that’s a situation I’ll be very happy with and then if you see a bunch of Israeli children with their limbs blown off, are we going to be crying about that too? No, we’re not going to be crying about it because at the end of the day, they’re not our fucking people! They made their bed, they lie in it. It’s their problem. Whether they’re right or wrong, it’s their fucking problem!

 

So for me, I care about White children and a future for White children and that’s that. And you could say that’s kind of harsh. But you have to draw the line somewhere in life.

 

It’s the same thing of I have children, I’m going to care a hell of a lot more about them. Like if my kid breaks his arm, it’s going to be the biggest deal in the world and I’ve got to make sure he gets to the hospital and I take care of the kid and so on. If some random kid breaks their arm, I’ll help him and do first aid and call the ambulance or whatever, maybe call the hospital and check on him. But I’m not going to like basically preside over his entire recovery process because he’s not my kid, right?

 

So like there’s like, there’s scales of concern that you can have for others. And at a certain point, you reach the point where if a kid breaks his arm in Perth, on the other side of the country, okay, well, some kid broke his arm in Perth. Like, I can’t. I don’t really give a fuck, right. It’s nothing to do with me. On a certain level, it’s sad that kids break their arms sometimes, but you stop caring at a certain point. You know, your obligations end, your responsibilities end as a human being at a certain point.

 

And it’s important that we reinforce that, because that’s really fundamental to the nationalist worldview and what’s been perverted in the minds of Whites through the way the media portrays things and the way that a lot of these discussions are carried out, where they’re carried out in these universal humanitarian language all the time, as opposed to carrying them out in terms of what are our interests, what are our responsibilities, who we are ultimately defending, and what’s beyond the scope of our responsibility. And that’s all I’m advocating for.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I can tell you this now. Every single nationalist movement in the world that was an ethno-nationalist movement at the time when there was the Iraq war, the Afghanistan war, were completely opposed to those and were completely opposed to that judeo-American globalism for a variety of different reasons. But if you’re not, you’re not, and that’s it.

 

So we’ll move on to the next question. ThinRedLine gave $14 and said:

 

“Great discussion Joel. Have you asked Keith for debate?”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, a few people reached out, including Elijah Schaffer wanted to host the debate. You wanted to host the debate. And so I brought it up to him, and then he was like:

 

“Well, you know, it could be good for exposure, but I don’t know if I really want to be like positioning myself as attacking our own side or something.”

 

Which I don’t know how that really makes sense when, like, you started the debate, like, why not? Why not finish it? Like, if we’re gonna do these essays, and he put another essay out today, another essay on the same subject, which is good. I like doing the essay stuff, but it’s like, surely let’s actually hammer it out in a debate. I think a lot of people would tune in for that. I think, particularly because Keith and I are longtime associates, it’d be interesting.

 

Mark Collett: The difference between a debate and writing an essay is a debate is a proper race where you’re out in the fresh air and you’re running against somebody who’s running hard against you. Writing an article and sticking up it online, he’s just doing a time trial on an indoor track. You know, it’s easy, it’s safe, and you avoid sort of any conflict or embarrassment and you minimise the number of variables that can go wrong.

 

So ultimately you don’t end up falling flat on your face or being publicly humiliated by coming second, 3rd, 4th, or being, you know, everyone’s saying you didn’t do so well. Because all you do is keep doing your time trial until you get the result you think is good enough to post online. You do that, everyone claps and it’s very controlled.

 

I think a lot of people fear debate because debate isn’t as controlled. Debate, you can throw some curveballs in there and that can be embarrassing for people.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think it’s necessarily embarrassing. Like obviously he feels his position is correct. So he feels, he has the arguments. Obviously I feel the same way. So like, why not test it? And a gentlemanly debate, obviously.

 

[2:02:21]

 

Mark Collett: That’s what I’m saying. Test it. That’s what I’m saying. It needs to be tested. Simply writing sort of like letters to each other online I don’t think is as instructive or as fun as a debate. And if Elijah Schaffer says he’s going to do it, he’s got a fantastic platform. You should do it on there. Simple.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Thin Red line. Okay, we’re gonna have to get through these Superchats because we’re past the two hour mark now. ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“We can’t have ethno-nationalism without taking down the myths surrounding World War II, because every time you ask for closed borders or re-migration, yours will be met by this is NS and it will lead to the Holocaust!”

 

I agree with that.

 

I’ve got to say this, and this is another reason why I find it so interesting that Keith came out with this now, I don’t think there’s been more, I don’t think in my lifetime there’s ever been more sort of public condemnation of sort of the Holocaust narrative and public questioning of the Holocaust narrative as there is now.

 

And I think the questioning of that, and I don’t think anyone says like nothing happened whatsoever! But the questioning of the Holocaust industry, the questioning of the more salacious stories that surround the Holocaust, I think is something which you know, does demystify this whole “nationalism bad because it leads to this”.

 

And again, I find it interesting that at a time when this is happening, this is being said. What do you think about that? About the sort of demystifying of the Holocaust and the fact that is something that fundamentally has always held back post-war nationalism?

 

Joel Davis: Well, absolutely! It’s a key component. It’s also obviously a reinforcement of specifically why you can’t criticise jewish power, that like if you criticise jews that that is somehow the first domino in the second Holocaust or something. And so it creates this injunction that gives them all these special exemptions to get away with what they get away with without critique, or at least like public mainstream critique. And that obviously is really melting it down in a big way because I think jewish power is becoming so explicit now that there seems to be a lot of awakening to it and a lot of people are starting to break ranks and start to talk about it in at least in a controlled sense.

 

And so then obviously the Holocaust gets brought up and therefore a lot more critical discussion around the Holocaust is taking place. And the Holocaust narrative obviously is very flimsy and it hasn’t actually stood up to a open, fair, reasonable public scrutiny because that hasn’t been allowed to take place. In most countries in Europe it’s not even legal to question it. And in the places where it is legal, like here or in Britain or in America if you want to be a historian that works in university and gets your books published by a mainstream publisher or whatever, and have a successful career as a historian, if you touch Holocaust revisionism, you can forget about that, right?

 

So even though you can technically still do it and you won’t get thrown in prison, nevertheless it’s career suicide! And so there’s a massive injunction.

 

And also people then who do take a Holocaust revisionist narrative, no one’s going to platform them to have debates against the regular historians. And the regular historians will gatekeep them out and won’t debate them and so on and so it’s very difficult for there to have an open and Frank public discourse. And as soon as anyone weighs into this subject, it’s super controversial and doesn’t take place.

 

If you had a completely controversy, free, open, rational space where this could be debated, it would crumble, right? It would completely crumble! You know, chimneys that aren’t connected, wooden doors. I mean, the list goes on. I mean, it’s ridiculous! So it can’t stand up to scrutiny.

 

So even if, when it gets a little bit of critical light shone on it, people do a few Google searches and think critically a little bit, and they say:

 

“Wait, wait a second, this is all bullshit!”

 

And particularly when you can see the political role that it’s being leveraged for. Like it’s an idea that creates political power for a particular group. So you should always be sceptical of that. When an idea is being leveraged to generate a particular political outcome, well then you can’t just take it at face value. Which is quite obvious. And I think a lot of people can sense that.

 

But I’m noticing a big shift where like older people as well, you know, older people in my life, in my friend’s life who were banging on about how the Holocaust was bullshit five years ago, ten years ago, and they weren’t having a bar of it.

 

Now they’re like:

 

“Oh I saw this documentary and did you know this?”

 

And then now they’re bringing up all these Holocaust revisionist facts and like weighing into the subject. There seemed to be a shift in the mood, which is obviously a very good thing. And at this point, White Identity Politics is going mainstream in many respects, at least in a discursive sense. Critical discourse of jewish power is going mainstream, at least in a discursive sense.

 

The only thing really that’s left is the rehabilitation of National Socialism itself being pushed into the mainstream. That’s really the last and most robust discursive gate-keeping that still exists. And so insofar as people like us that are trying to like push that across the line, it’s really about breaking that enemy control of the discourse. Even if you don’t agree with National Socialism, if you’re at least on our side, you should at least get out of the way and allow us to try and like push that through. Or actually you should be helping! Because open discussion space where we can at least consider National Socialism rationally and openly, even if you are critical of it, is still better for us than what currently exists.

 

[2:08:21]

 

Mark Collett: Okay, we’ve got another question from It Was Made Up who gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“There’s one thing missing from this conversation and that’s Keith. Do you think he’ll do a stream with you about this? He seemed to be indicate he wanted to put this to bed today. With his SubStack today. So maybe not.”

 

Well, we’ve already kind of answered that but thank you for the Superchat. Jagdeep Jano gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Hey Joel. Tom recently spoke on Keith Woods cringe worthy and humiliating and cringe-worthy DMs that were leaked by an adult worker he caught feelings for named Slayter. She dated rappers and was disowned by her family. Why did Keith caught her and fall in love with her? Could you psychoanalyze this?”

 

Joel Davis: It’s nonsense! Next Superchat?

 

Mark Collett: What’s nonsense? Having feelings for a girl like that or the Superchatters?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, just like, just go on about bullshit!

 

Mark Collett: You know what Joel? You’re the [chuckling] hardest person to make laugh in the whole world! That was obviously meant to be sort of like a humourous Superchat. And my response to it was humourous. It’s like obviously it was a joke. You can’t psychoanalyze something like that. I believe Keith was just being polite to her and she thought she’d got a big own by leaking her Superchats. But the motto or the moral of said story is, if you have a complete skank like that, don’t treat them with the respect they don’t deserve. How’s that for a hoe owning comment, as you youngsters may say.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. True.

 

Mark Collett: Arab Social Nationalist gave $1.88. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“Perhaps what’s happening here is that figures on the Right are struggling with the terrible truth that is crystallizing in front of them. There is no Parliamentary or Democratic way out of the crisis of modernity. NS is necessary precisely because it is revolutionary.”

 

Joel Davis: Yep, that’s one of my key points.

 

Mark Collett: White Bracer gave $20. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Hashtag stream Starfield team and he qualified that by saying Australia is Starfield.”

 

Well thank you very much. DerCherusker gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great debate and powerful takes. I agree with Joel. The watered down version won’t work.”

 

Thank you so much! Jagdeep Jano gave another $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“People are open to Europa being fact checked, but Keith was saying bad stuff like Hitler was anti-Slavic and jews don’t have a monopoly on central banks or gold global finance. He was parroting Wikipedia. I suggest a two on two bare knuckle boxing fight. Mark and Joel versus Keith and Alec Yerbery.”

 

[chuckling] I’ve seen Joel in real life. He the weird thing about Joel is some people look bigger on stream and then they turn out to be small in real life. Like people always say to me that I look a lot bigger on stream but in real life I’m a lot smaller. Joel’s the other way around. Like when you first meet him in real life I couldn’t get over how sort of tall and well built he is. I think, if me and Joel were double teaming anyone in a sort of a bare knuckle fight, I’d be very, very pleased being on Joel’s side. He’s a sizable guy and has a good weight advantage. Arab Social Nationalist gave a $1.88 again. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“If the answer to an existential crisis is not revolutionary, then it isn’t the answer. You cannot accept that Whites are on the brink of extinction and at the same time insist that the response should be as polite and acceptable as possible. Makes no sense. Conservatism is poison.”

 

Well thank you very much. Mitch gave $3. Thank you so much my friend. He said:

 

“Hi, great great stream. Question to Joel. You said you went to India as a teenager. How come you went there?”

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I was raised in as a Protestant Christian and it was a kind of charity type arrangement that the Church that I went to was involved with. So it was under the auspices of basically helping out underprivileged children and so on. And I guess my parents encouraged me to go because they thought it would be enriching experience or whatever. And it was an experience that only made me detest [chuckling] that group of people more than maybe I otherwise would have. But although living in Australia, it’s not like you need to go to India to know what Indians are like.

 

Mark Collett: Beanie wearing Australian buffoon, you make me sick! I was really sick! Do you know, do you know what? Do you know? I find even more sickening than seeing Palestinians having their arms and legs blown off is goofy White teenagers going to places like India to wipe their brows and assist them with medical aid. You liberal Aussie! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Well actually there’s a statue of one of my ancestors in London in Trafalgar Square, Charles Napier. And he actually conquered Pakistan. He was the commander in chief of British forces in India.

 

So I guess I was just heading back to old lands, …

 

Mark Collett: To assert your dominance!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there were one ours, and I don’t want them to be ours again. You know it obviously has kind of backfired the whole conquering India thing, so, …

 

Mark Collett: I can’t believe [chuckling] this argument’s gone full circle like this. God, I never thought you’d say something like that Joel.

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean?

 

Mark Collett: You’re the person I could least imagine going anywhere in the world to administer any form of aid!

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s pathological altruism! There you go. Like the White man., …

 

[2:14:15]

 

Mark Collett: That’s what I mean. After everything you said earlier, you say this now.

 

Joel Davis: But I think it adds authenticity to my story. To start from a foundation like that and to have to develop as a man and attack your own foundation, criticise it and develop a pure view over many, many years of arduous struggle reading, trying out different ideas and so on to come ultimately to these conclusions as a fully mature, you know, adult male now. So.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, thank you. Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Hail Joel! Complete agreement with Joel. Generic nationalism will never work.”

 

You got a lot of fans in the chat tonight, and I’ve got to say it has been entertaining. We’ve had our own little debate of our own about the sort of ability to work with other ethnic groups.

 

But I’ve got to say I found your passion and sincerity very important in this. And you know, that certainly can’t be questioned. And you seem to impress a lot of people with what you’ve said. Arab Social Nationalist gave another 1.88. Thank you so much, and said:

 

“The ‘I don’t care about Palestine’ thing works fine if you’re a Bolivian, but the fact is that the UK and the US are both parties to that conflict. If you can extricate White countries from the conflict, not caring about them is perfectly reasonable. But only then. Whites pay for it in blood and treasure.”

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I said is I don’t support us being, I don’t support the state of Israel quite clearly.

 

But you can see this Arab is obviously so emotionally invested in the plight of his own people that he can’t even listen to the words that I said correctly. And I don’t love Palestinians enough for him. And this is exactly the problem with these fucking people! It’s never good enough! I can say:

 

“I hate Israel! I want them completely cut off!”

 

Mark Collett: Be careful what you say Joel, because I don’t want [words unclear]

 

Joel Davis: Fucking bitch about it like, seriously! You’re getting the result that you want. Just be happy with that.

 

Mark Collett: Okay? Keep Asking for the Truth gave five dollars, … What? Somebody just posted. Right. Okay, look, a few. Oh, the Starfield people meant that jokingly, so that’s okay. I was gonna say I had to ban somebody in the chat earlier for saying something rude about me, but if anyone says anything rude about Joel, I will also ban them. I haven’t banned anyone permanently, but I’ve given a timeout to someone who said that if I spent as much time caring about White girls that were raped as I did about Palestinian children that were blown up would have won by now. That person is a complete idiot, considering I faced seven years in jail for speaking out against Muslim grooming gangs and were put on two of the longest and most expensive political trials in British history. So I spent a huge amount of time raising the issue of grooming gangs.

 

And in fact, myself and Nick Griffin were the first men in Britain to raise the issues of grooming gangs publicly and politically. And both of us were put on lengthy trials for that. I was actually charged with eight counts of inciting racial hatred for talking about the issue of grooming. So anyone says I don’t care about it is either historically illiterate, or a fed.

 

I Keep Asking for Truth gave $5 and said:

 

“Test it.”

 

Well, thank you. I’m not sure what it was in relation to. And Keep Asking for Truth gave another $3. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“Joel is too based for most to handle. Based AF, appreciate it.”

 

He is very based. He’s a good guy and I’m pleased that he’s fought the corner he has fought. Saturn 5, said:

 

“Hi chaps.”

 

And gave $3. Thank you very much. Space Kangay, $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“If we had a hundred non-Whites agree to National Socialism, 90 would still refuse to leave our countries. This is reflective for many hours of discussion on OME and chat apps.”

 

Well, thank you. I think that’s Joel’s point.

 

Joel Davis: And as in the chat here, trying to ask questions. But you got to send Mark a Superchat. Like, we’re not answering your question unless you pay up, bitch! You know what I mean?

 

Mark Collett: To be fair, Joe, usually on a Sunday night, I do the questions for free because I’m captain. I am very charitable. Usually on the Sunday night and the Friday night streams, I do the questions for free. But we have, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, I’m not doing any free questions! Pay the man! Pay the fucking man!

 

Mark Collett: You see, [chuckling] you can see there’s a distinct disconnect between Joel and myself. And it might be an Aussie British thing. I’m very easygoing, humourous, and probably come across as sort of slightly nicer and less sweary. And Joel is sort of more hardcore, slightly more sweary and harder to amuse. We have got a slight smirk out of him!

 

Joel Davis: Why is that an Australian thing? Why? Like you said, …

 

Mark Collett: I was kind of brought up believing that Australians were all kind of like Max Rockatansky and were just like brooding, hardcore people that lived in the wasteland struggling for that last drop of gasoline.

 

[2:19:25]

 

Joel Davis: Well, that was one thing that I did feel when, I mean, I love coming to Britain, and unless they don’t let me in, I’ll definitely be back.

 

And I do feel very at home in Britain because it’s my ancestral homeland and I’ve always loved visiting and I’ve always felt very comfortable there from the very first moment I walked on the land and spoke to people, because I already have so many people in my life that are British, and obviously that’s my ancestry. And Australia is fundamentally built by the British, so obviously that makes sense.

 

But one thing that I did feel alienated by when I was in Britain was the fact that it did seem like people were a little bit more sensitive. Like they were taking offence a little bit at things that I was saying. Australians, I guess, we are a little bit more rough in a certain sense. When I got back home, I was like:

 

“Okay, I can be myself. I don’t have to worry about coming across like I hate you or something.”

 

And people think that:

 

“Oh, why would he say that to me? Is he angry?”

 

It’s like, no. It’s just how we talk, I guess. So.

 

Mark Collett: Just for the record, and I’m going to embarrass Joel now. He’s a lot more fun when he’s off stream. When he’s off stream, he’s kind of like my naughty little brother. And I was driving around England with him, laughing and joking with him. I’ve got to say, I thought I was the harshest when it came to roasting people and winding them up until I met Joel. And Joel is a master of roasting other people and winding them up.

 

And I’ve got to say, he’s endless entertainment. I wish I could draw this out of him on stream because I did feel this immediate affinity to him when I met him.

 

And I’ve got to say I’ve met a few people over the years, sort of like Warren Balogh. It was fantastic meeting him, Blair. But meeting Joel was also one of the highlights. And I got to say, like, one of the things that really disappointed me is that Joel couldn’t come over for like Sunday dinner with the family and everything because he is a really good guy. And I know we have the odd disagreement, but he is one of the people in this movement that I do respect the most.

 

AWIVR gave $3. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Cheers Mark and Joel.”

 

Son of Mars gave $5. Thank you so much! And he sent a little something that looks like a cheese with an Odysee man on it. So thank you so much for that. Keep Asking for Truth sent $3. Thank you very much. He said:

 

“I don’t ask, I just say increase the vril. Let’s go! Keep on doing. Great work, Joel.”

 

Yes, Vril power. I know what that means. Sticks Sent Me Here, gave $5. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“We don’t need to be friends or receive empathy from Muslims, but if our greatest enemy is their greatest enemy, we could achieve our goal of conquest much faster. Like the British and the Soviets in the 1940s.”

 

An interesting point somewhere between myself and Joel’s position.

 

And by the way, I’m not saying we should be best friends with when I probably just have a bit too much empathy, but you can’t hate me for that. Bluey Wap. Well, maybe you can. [chuckling] I don’t know. People hate me for a lot of reasons. Add that one to the growing pile. Bluey Waffen gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“We can be friendly or sympathetic to like minded non-Whites, but we must stick to our principles and not allow them into our groups lest we risk turning an ethnic nationalist group into a Tommy Robinson style civic nationalist group.”

 

You see, I just want to answer that one briefly and I’ll say this. When I see sort of like black people who want to remain black and want to separate themselves from us, I’m much more willing to go along with that. I don’t want a Tommy Robinson style thing where Tommy wants a rainbow world just minus Islam. He wants a rainbow world ruled over by sort of powerful Israeli elites just without any Muslims there. And I do see, I don’t know what Joel thinks about this, but I do see this kind of, how can I say this?

 

So there’s plenty of reasons to not want Muslims in the West, okay? And I don’t want any Muslims in the West. I want to say Muslims shouldn’t be here in places like Britain. I think Joel, we totally agree on that, don’t we? We don’t want Muslims here in White countries.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, no! Bring as many Muslims in as you want! I love Muslims. What are you talking about?

 

Mark Collett: Joel’s finally gone crazy! No. So obviously we’re united on the fact we don’t want them here.

 

But one thing that I think is kind of strange, and one thing about the Tommy Robinson thing that maybe Joel would like to comment on is Tommy’s got this weird thing where he doesn’t want Muslims here, Muslim men, but he does want Muslim women coming here by the boatload. And I kind of find that the Tommy anti-Islam. So Tommy’s reasons for being anti-Islam are in some ways different to ours, but his kind of view of anti-Islam tends to lead to this sort of desire for war. So it’s like the Trump anti-Islam thing is like:

 

“Look, we need to go to war with Iran.”

 

Whereas I’m opposed to war with Iran and think as long as Iranians are in Iran, I’m happy for Iran to be the way it is. I don’t know what your take is on that. And that’s really what I was trying to say. Maybe I got confused earlier. Maybe I spoke over you. Some people in the chat said I didn’t. If I did that, I didn’t certainly mean to cause you any offence.

 

But what I’m trying to say is you have to be very careful about some of this anti-Muslim rhetoric rhetoric, because it’s anti-Muslim rhetoric which is designed to whip young White men into some frenzy, where they’re willing to sign up to go and fight in Iraq or Iran or somewhere like that at the behest of the jews. Do you concede that at all? Do you think there’s any merit to that argument?

 

[2:25:15]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously. But the problem is when the criticism of Islam is built around Islam as an ideology or something or as a worldview, as opposed to just recognizing it as a foreign alien element that doesn’t belong in our societies. And that it represents the kind of culture of a foreign race. That’s the issue with it.

 

And then secondarily, as well, like Europe has been under siege by Islam in various respects for over a thousand years. And so that history needs to be conscious and recognised. And so, yeah, like, you can get this kind of Deus vult*, this framing of Zionist foreign policy, as if it’s like a new crusade or something. And how based is that?

 

[* Deus vult (Latin for ‘God wills it’) is a Christian motto historically tied to ideas of divine Providence and individual interpretation of God’s will. It was first chanted by Catholics during the First Crusade in 1096 as a rallying cry. Wikipedia]

 

But, I mean, obviously that’s disingenuous. And it’s just ridiculous as well. Like, why are we going and fighting Muslims in foreign countries when they’re in our own fucking country? [chuckling] Like, it doesn’t even, … So, like, we’ve got to protect Israel from Israel, …

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I certainly agree with that point. I think we sort of come the full circle, and I think it’s been an interesting discussion. We’ve run to nearly two and a half hours now, so I think it’s about time we sort of shut this down.

 

But you know what, Joel? I’ve really enjoyed this night. I think you’ve made a very powerful case, both historically, ideologically, functionally, and, well, in every way. And I’ve got to say, you are a true gentleman to come on and discuss these issues.

 

And I just want to say, if you’ve got a brief sort of two minutes, how you’d like to sum this up before we shut it down, that’d be appreciated.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, just to get back to the original subject, I think the key point is this, which is that I don’t think the thing holding back the White race is fundamentally the framing of arguments. I think the thing holding back the White race is cowardice. I think people have motivated, reasoning. People want to reason their way into a worldview or into a set of beliefs that make them feel comfortable, that make them feel secure, that make them feel safe inside.

 

And so the issue of cowardice and the issue of dishonour is more fundamental than whether this argument or that argument makes sense or not. I believe in the total rational coherence of my worldview, but at the same time, I recognise that it is a worldview that is prohibited fundamentally in the minds of many because of the fear of social ostracism or the fear of the ramifications and implications of the worldview, as opposed to the truth or falsity of the worldview just being rationally evaluated in and of itself.

 

So that is also the framing of the National Socialist issue. Like, the debate is very seldom about the specific, actual ideas of National Socialism, whether they are good or bad, or whether using those ideas in contemporary context would be good or bad. The debate is mostly about how people “feel” about the idea and how it freaks people out.

 

And I think acquiescing to:

 

“Well, this freaks people out. Therefore we shouldn’t consider it!”

 

It’s just acquiescing to the same psychical structure that is basically putting us in this position in the first place. That whole psychical structure of cowardice, that whole psychical structure of dishonour needs to be challenged directly!

 

And as I said before, I think World War II was a metaphysical war between the particular and the universal. And I think in order for White particularity to be defended, particularity metaphysically needs to be defended at the core of our worldview.

 

And so that would be like how I would maybe summate. I think the most important aspect of my position and everything else kind of flows from there.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! It’s been an entertaining stream. I think we’ve done a bit of everything and we’ve given people half an hour extra than they expected.

 

I’d like to thank Joel for being such a good support and getting up early in the morning. I’d like to urge Keith, if he’s watching, to please do a debate with Joel over on Elijah Schaffer’s channel. Or if you need somewhere smaller and less famous, do it on mine, of course. [chuckling] That would be appreciated.

 

I’ve had a great evening and I’d like to thank everyone who’s been in the chat. A few people made rude comments. Those people were temporarily timed out. But I don’t give out permanent bans very often. But please do be respectful both to myself and Joel.

 

Joel Davis: Come in the chat and call me jewish and accuse me of being a communist and a fed. It’s funny! We should just fill the whole chat with these accusations like why even, like have the sound off and just spam how we’re Fed communist jews and just maniacally just keep typing away and banging the entity.

 

Mark Collett: That’s what I mean.

 

Joel Davis: We should just have a live chat where you can just accuse us of all these things constantly and that would be hilarious!

 

Mark Collett: There’s a guy called Jimbo who loves, who absolutely loves one of your Telegram moderators. He’s been talking about him all night. So apparently, you know, anyway, before Joel kicks this particular hornet’s nest so hard that we can’t sleep for the next week because of the stings, we’re gonna call it a day.

 

But it has been really good! Thanks for getting up so early, Joel. Thanks to everyone in the chat. I know it’s been a heated debate, but from my point, I’ve got to say Joel is a stand up guy. I’ve really enjoyed it. Me and Joel agree on what 95% things. We had a little bit debate about something from a certain perspective. I do respect Joel’s point of view, and I think everyone should support him as much as they can. I think he’s a very, very brave guy, especially to take the point that he’s taken at such a young age. You know, he’s putting his whole future in this cause. And obviously, I wish him all the best and I hope to continue working with him long into that future.

 

So thank you so much, Joel. You’re a stand up character!

 

Anyway, we’re going to shut things down now. Thank you so much to everyone who’s here. Thanks to Joel. Thank you much for everyone who donated so generously.

 

I’ll be back on Wednesday for another episode of Patriotic Weekly Review. But for now, thank you and good night, everyone, and have a lovely weekend, whatever’s left of it. Good night.

 

[2:31:49]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/27/2025 = 1629)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

7
6
Hide replies

@katana17
2 days ago
[Mark Collett – Can National Socialism Be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis – Mar 23, 2025 – Transcript]

Mark Collett – Can National Socialism Be Resurrected? – with Joel Davis – Mar 23, 2025 – Transcript

[In this livestream video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, talks with Joel Davis on the need to rehabilitate National Socialism as an alternative to (((liberal))) democracy that is destroying the West. Items discussed include:
Mark introduces Joel Davis as a leading young intellectual in the world-wide nationalist movement (2:00)
Joel explains he wrote an essay defending the rehabilitation of National Socialism in response to Keith Woods’ criticism (7:00)
Joel argues nationalism needs an ideology to serve it, and National Socialism is built entirely out of the nationalist idea (10:00)
Joel discusses Carl Schmitt’s prediction that liberalism and nationalism would become enemies (13:00)
Joel argues Germany had a unique historical role in resisting liberalism in Europe (18:00)
Mark asks Joel to focus on why National Socialism is relevant today rather than historical context (22:00)
Joel says Australia needs National Socialist principles to survive as a White nation (25:00)
“We need a movement that inspires people to have courage.”-Joel (30:00)
Discussion of the term “Nazi” losing power as an insult (35:00)
Joel criticises conservatives for allowing the Left to dictate their standards (40:00)
Mark questions Joel’s opposition to working with other ethnic nationalist groups (45:00)
“I want to have a space where White people organise our own politics amongst ourselves.”-Joel (50:00)
Debate over showing empathy for Palestinian victims vs focusing solely on White interests (60:00)
Joel argues Whites need to focus on organising themselves rather than foreign conflicts (70:00)
“We need fighters. I mean, obviously by fighters you mean political fighters.”-Mark (75:00)
And more, …
Less

8
2
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Mark,
This discussion would have been better if it wasn’t focused on Joel’s views.
A better approach would have been to go through the history and precepts of NatSoc -and Drexler/Feder’s 25 points- to see if they can still be applied today.
That’s what I tuned in for.
Tip: even Goebbels called out the 25 points as being too Teutonic and out of date. Look instead at the manifesto of the DAP.
Both Striker and Warren will speak with perspicacity on this, rather than frustration, anger, heedlessness.

7
4
DerCherusker
3 days ago
$10.00
Great debate and powerful takes. I agree with Joel, the watered down version won’t work.

35
2
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
The “I don’t care about Palestine” thing works fine if you are Bolivian. But the fact is that the US and UK are both parties to that conflict. If you can extricate White countries from the conflict, not caring about it is perfectly reasonable, but only then. Whites pay for it in blood and treasure.

41
11
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago
true. also there is a strategic reason to care, it has done more damage to israels image than anything else in the past 80 years. for that reason alone everyone should be keeping Gaza in the spotlight as long as possible

15
3
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
And done nothing to help white people. Even emboldens them because Israel is viewed as a white supremacist state by most Arabs and those who support Palestine.

4
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago
ah yes silly me, all those videos of israel bombing children were actually GOOD for israel! thats why they never took tiktok down! of course.
we should all just forget any of it ever happened and only talk about relevant things like the shoa, right rabbi?

2
1
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
1 day ago
Its good because majority of normal people view Israel as a white supremacist coloniser state and blame white people and christians for the genocide againts Palestinians.

0
1
Hide replies

@xero
1 day ago
I think “most” is a huge overstatement. Also protestant christians in the US are at least partially directly to blame, without them israel would not be in a position to do any of this.

1
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
This is a non-sequitur. He did not say “good for israel.” He said “done nothing to help white people.” He is correct that arabs are anti-white leftists in the US and Europe mostly. Only when their own hides are on the line do Arabs appeal to Hitler.

HH
2 days ago
We can condemn Israel without siding or appealing to the Arabs or other minorities.

6
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago(edited)
condemning them for genociding [x group] implicitly puts you “on the side” of [x group]. not sure what you are even trying to say there.

1
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
If that nonsense is correct then Davis doesn’t have to be friendly towards any POC and doesn’t have to say “poor muslims” he just has to condemn the genocide to please the likes of you. But that still isn’t enough even going by your own logic, you obviously require more from him. You want him to officially state his position as POC alliance friendly.
I condemn the act of genocide but personally I don’t give a damn about any Arab/Jew or non White. If every last one of them were to be swept aside by natural disaster I wouldn’t spend more than a second thinking about them. I would how ever spend more time thinking about the poor animals that may have been effected.

1
1
Hide replies

@xero
2 days ago(edited)
doesn’t have to say “poor muslims” he just has to condemn the genocide to please the likes of you.
correct. the rest of your comment is stupid.
“I can only be a White nationalist if I don’t have empathy for non-whites”
this sounds stupid and childish because it is. You sound like a toddler. If you truly didn’t care about any arabs or non-whites then why is their genocide bad or different than a natural disaster from your perspective?

1
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
I am not about to waste my time trying to explain beyond black and white to a genius who has not grasped simple English grammar. I’ll leave you to dwell on the matter and I’ll give you an eternity to do so simpleton.

0
1
Hide replies

@xero
1 day ago
you’re just an edgelord with no actual worldview. I bet your dumbass is covered in tattoos

1
0
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago(edited)
You have the English grammar of a nine year old and talk like a 15 year old. Probably something to do with the fact you’re a shit skin from the the Gay American Empire. Not my fault you’re a small brained, simple organism. That would be mother nature’s evolutionary selection.

0
1
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
They have millions of students even some jews on literally every university in the West protesting for Palestine, ofcourse calling Israel a white supremacist coloniser nation. At the same time no Palestinian movement or pro-Palestine movement ever protested againts the injustices done to the white race.

11
6
Hide replies

@lewpers
2 days ago
Irrelevant – jews brought them here.

5
4
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Yet its the muslims who do all the raping, mudering and terrorising. Lets cry some more over an alien people who terrorise us on a daily basis.

2
2
Hide replies

@lewpers
2 days ago
Yes, let’s attack the bees and not the hive first.

1
1
Carnegie
2 days ago
You’re trying to imply that jewish lead Palestine protests, that mainly consist of BLM, Antifa supporters, and westernized Muslims, are somehow representative of actual ethnic Palestinians, in Palestine, that are fighting our greatest enemy so that they can stay in their land.

4
1
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
I am saying that Palestinian Arabs have more support than white people, and for the only explicilty pro-white movements use their energy to support Arabs is completely useless. As for them fighting our so called greatest enemy, do you really think if Israel ceases to exist as a state that all the millions of muslims who terrosise white people on a daily basis in western countries will all just pack up and leave. You live in an echo chamber and weaking a small state in the Middle East wont stop antiwhite ideology.

1
1

@selly
2 days ago
im pretty sure hamas did a whole publicity stunt during the george floyd riots supporting blm

1
1

@lewpers
2 days ago(edited)
General rule of thumb: anyone arguing that they don’t care about Palestinians is either taking $$$ from someone or a brain dead boomer. Everyone else understands the connection between what’s happening there and those who rule us.

9
11
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Where are the Palestinians straining their ovaries about White genocide and the connection to us being targeted for murder by ethnics because of the jew subversion?

1
0
Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
You said the same thing earlier, BAP.

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
All the “WE should align with shit skins” moral fags can never argue against this point. Every single time.

0
1
Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
You’re Jewish

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Haha accusing anyone who isn’t a shit skin loving moral fag of “taking $$$ from someone”, basically accusing the only real NATSOCs in existence of being on the take and then calling anyone who defends NATSOC of being a jew. And no actual point to make against cucking to shit skins. You’ve been Noticed.

Hide replies

@lewpers
1 day ago
anyone with your opinion IS Jewish, though?

Hide replies
HH
1 day ago(edited)
Anyone with your level of English grammar isn’t worth listening to let alone your utter failure to get past the very first obstacle to your “love the shit skins” moral fagging. We know what you’re here to do, you’d be more effective on faceberg.

@Uncle_Anon
2 days ago
Agreed, it’s the same for “I don’t care about Ukraine I’m America first!”, bitch you made this ‘conflict’, hell you even blew up a pipeline.

3
1
Hide replies
HH
1 day ago
Why are so many people talking like American negros? That entire sentence has got a Shaniqua overtone.

Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Mate, too many Nats have zero ideological consistency.
They are happy with appearing monsters without humanity.
#GrugNats
Email me with a ‘hello’

11
2
HH
2 days ago
Until we start hearing loud and powerful condemnations from Palestinians and other muslims/minorities when their kind commit patterns of crimes against the Indigenous host populations where they seek “refuge” we should all be with Davis on this. It’s always Whites who are held to the jewish subversion of “silence is violence”, but muslims, they don’t have to make a sound when we’re targeted for murder/rape/violence by them. National Socialists were not responsible for the creation of Israel that was liberal democracy, so let proponents of democracy appeal to the minorities, let liberals apologise for the creation of Israel and all the problems they’re causing to the muslims. If NATSOC won Israel and it’s little tribe would have far less power if any.

10
4
Hide replies

@selly
2 days ago
Exactly. Muslims are quite happy to work hand in glove with the jews when it suits them moors invasions in Europe, Ottomans invasions of Europe all prime examples. Are muslims guilty about murdering, raping and pillaging lands? No they celebrate it and outright speak of their desire to do it again to Europe.

4
0

@Chromophobic
2 days ago
People forget or aren’t aware that National Socialists were explicitly pro Arab and anti zionist. Jews are the enemy. This is the worst thing that has happened to them since 1933. To not capitalize on it is idiotic. Holding jews to the standards that they set for us is basic logic.

4
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
I guess we sort of pay for the Turkish occupation of Cyprus also–at least our government allowed it to occur, but not many Arabs/moslems (if any) speak up about that. I think the jews are showing their inhumanity nicely in Palestine. I pity anyone at their mercy, but I wish the Arabs/moslems would have the same sense of justice when it comes to the rights of whites. The number of caustic moslems — Levant Arabs specifically — settling Germany likely exceeds the number of caustic jews in Roman Palestine.

2
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$3.00
Joel is to based for most to handle. Based af Appreciate it.

28
2
Hide replies
Caledonian Alemanni
3 days ago
*too based

10
1

@xero
2 days ago
he is truly a supreme gentleman

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The Palestinians have never asked anyone outside their region to fight for them. Not ever. They ask for nothing other than to stop supplying ISrael with the means to kill them.

23
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
So they should love Davis style NATSOC because he wants to cut Israel and jews out of White countries. Why do we have to apologise to them as well?

4
0
Asadafa
1 day ago
It is not white nationalists giving these lampshades weapons. It would be nice if Arabs focused their information inwards and on their extremists to attack jew lobbyists rather than white women.

4
0
Son of Mars
3 days ago
Overcoming the Holocaust myth is important. It creates a total frame shift once you realize how much we were lied to.

21
0
ILoveJesusChrist
3 days ago(edited)
What a breath of fresh air! Joel thinks like a winner. His thinking is the type of thinking required if White people even have a chance. Mark’s take sounds kind, but it will not end White Genocide. Focusing on the plight of other racial groups instead of ourselves is a losing strategy. NonWhites do not care about White people. If you talk to any of them long enough you will find they are all antiWhite. Some are just less antiWhite than others.

20
2
AurigaBooks
2 days ago
National Socialism is fundamentally aligned w/ nature, and unlike communism, it works in practice \o

17
1
Hide replies
0KT0BER
2 days ago
I very much doubt that any White folk are pushing the ‘christ is king/nazi’s were christians’ horseshit.
Just posting this to bolster your claim.
https://odysee.com/@0KT0BER:9/folkandfaith:0

3
0
HH
3 days ago(edited)
kosher Greg Johnson: “We shouldn’t align with NSDAP because normal people associate them with all the lies and untruth propaganda they’ve been told about them”.

16
2
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Greg is like 75 now I believe. KMac is much better from that generation.

0
2
Hide replies

@Diogenes
2 days ago
Greg is like 53 so you’re way off there. I believe Kevin MacDonald is 80. personally I admire them both.

2
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
Being an avid reader of CC it is my opinion Greg Johnson has now been compromised. Article after article about the blax but nothing on the constant attacks on Whites by jews, yeah but the blax are the real problem. Leading up to the election he suddenly became a massive Trump shill in a MAGAtard sense. An article posted today where the writer talks about looking at “elder personalities” and mentions two jewish writers that have done nothing for Whites but they’ve written constantly about delusional blax on why they just can’t seem to do civilisation. Moderators on CC have been instructed that no one can be seen disagreeing with the supreme leader in any impactful way in the comments.

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
I think we are both wrong. I’ll keep an eye out for it. I stopped following Greg some time ago.

2
0
Hide replies
HH
2 days ago
I stopped very recently. By follow I mean frequent his website, which was up until he flipped invaluable to our cause.

@ArcadeOutpost
2 days ago(edited)
56:15
and Christianity has been a massive factor behind universalist thought, it was the first thing to start eroding at racial identity in favor of universalist ideals

17
2

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need whites to stop caring about other races

18
3
The National
2 days ago
Show me Muslims that care about the raped British girls. They don’t…
But Whites need to care about every shitskin. This is why Whites lose

16
4
Hide replies
Carnegie
2 days ago
Show me Muslims that care about the raped British girls. They don’t…
Neither does the British government.
But Whites need to care about every shitskin. This is why Whites lose
Whites lose because the jews take a legitimate grievance and use it to manipulate low IQ people. Currently they’re using it to prevent you from dealing a serious blow to their global credibility. It’s a free shot at the jews so why not take it. You don’t have to support it, just don’t countersignal the people that do.
And we’re not talking about all non-whites. We’re talking about the Palestinians who are fighting against the jews to stay in their own nation.

4
4

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
How was Hitler anti-Slavic? what utter rubbish that is.

11
0
Hide replies
Smoothie
2 days ago
he wasn’t technically anti Slavic, in his book he wrote about how it bothered him that there were so many Slavs who left the Soviet Union and began taking low class jobs in Austria, hence why Adolf ended up homeless at one point, so he was irritated by that but propaganda likes to use that to say he didn’t think Slavs were white or whatever else they come up with, he actually felt sorry for them and wanted to destroy communism so they could go about their lives in their own homelands

7
0
Hide replies
Asadafa
5 hours ago
I think it was mainly ethnics from within AT-HU. Hitler writes about this in regards to the Vienna parliament. German AT had the particular situation that much of its industry was given to the Czechs, as were a good portion of its national archives, which were held at the oldest German university, Karlsuniversitaet in Prague. The reason for this, which Hitler details in his speech April 29, 1939, is that Prague (under LU) was once deutsche Kaiserstadt. The Kaiser moved to Vienna roughly permanently in 1438.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KarlIV.(HRR
) The Czech issue was added to the Hanseatic issue of Danzig and the Corridor and Russian-hosted bolshevism.

Pure
2 days ago(edited)
He was nordicist supremacist, so basically at least indifferent of everyone else. If germany had won, had it passed laws on the now huge area(basically europe as a whole and likely much of russia) of 3rd reich that non northwest european peoples are officially 2nd class citizens and/or slaves in the 3rd reich(europe) is another question. I think such laws would have been passed.

0
6
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago(edited)
If that had been the case such laws would have been a long way off as it was estimated that the make-up of the German people was around 65% Nordic/Aryan with the remaining 35% being the other white races of Europe…..It was a universal agreement that there was no such thing as a 100% Aryan in NS Germany, they respected all races, but in their own regions.

2
0
Hide replies
Pure
1 day ago
I dont know the exact genetics of 30s germans/people living in germany. Other than they were most likely germanics by en large. But i do know that in fact Hitler was nordicist supremacist. Nobody knows what would have happened in each european nation in case of german total victory. I mean besides you people of course.
So i think that due to the fact of Hitlers nordicist supremacism, its very likely that in case of a total victory by 3rd reich most of europe would have been made as part/vassals of the 3rd reich empire, including most of russia.
And non northwest europeans would have been seen as inferiour to the master race in the 3rd reich empire. Because they simply were. And as such treated differently both socially and under the laws.
3rd reich was not about a peace and love inclusion fest that many seem to think. It was an militaristic empire in the making. One that would rival russian empire and american empire and british empire. And thats why the other empires had to become allies and crush that emerging empire. And to make sure germany/germans never pose such threat to them ever. And they did make sure of that. And lets not forget not only about germans, but of other axis nations. The allied empires punished any nation who fought on axis side and made sure such uprising/revolt doesnt happen again in europe.
Ns Germany did make brutal war against other europeans. But somehow many that call themselves nationalists think ns Germany was just this big peace and love country. Like misunderstood hippies or something. In war you kill them, conquer them, take/use their natural resources, including their fertile women. And you subjugate them to under your power, culture, norms and laws.
Less

0
2
Hide replies

@RonP1
1 day ago(edited)
In the 1930s the Germans, especially in the northwestern parts were near identical to Brits, but Germany’s territory went right across to East Prussia, so it’s pretty obvious that Germany was a mixture…..as I said, it was a universal agreement that there was no such thing as a 100% Aryan in Germany, but it was the predominant strain in the make-up of the people, and they decided that they wanted to protect and improve that strain.

3
0
Hide replies
Pure
19 hours ago
I dont really care what germans at that time were. Im interested about the actions, not of the exact genetics. And more precisely of likely or possible future actions taken by the 3rd reich empire in europe if it had won over the british, russian and american empires. But this is clearly very touchy subject for most people or at least most ns people. Again it seems like many truly believe it would have been an eternal love and peace fest.

0
2
Asadafa
1 day ago
This is mostly untrue and unrealistic. Russia was a backwards mess in 1900. Poland was not quite as bad but still weak and disorganized and claiming territory from Germans, Czechs, Belarussians, Ukrainians, and Lithuanians. “Czechoslovakia” under Benes–a completely invented nation in which the Czech supremacists were only 55% majority — did everything everything in the 1920s to 1930s to infuriate everyone besides Czechs, including the Slovaks and Poles. NS Germany did not “take” women from other societies, and it allied with Hungary, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia, and (formally) BiH.

2
0
Hide replies
Pure
19 hours ago(edited)
Being allies in war time doesnt have to do with friendship. Those are strategic decisions. I mean germany made war against its former allies. But you already knew that. Many have turned against their allies, so it doesnt really mean much. What matters at least to me is what is actually done. Interesting aspects of war is also how birthrates in occupied france rose up sharply. I dont claim germans took french women and made them pregnant whilst having first killed/imprisoned lots of french men. Nor do i claim that in wars in general that sort of phenomenom happens, that winner would take it all, including many of the fertile women.

0
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
11 hours ago
Which allies?

1
0
Hide replies
Pure
10 hours ago
Go study

0
1
MTaylor
2 days ago
If you can trust this info, take a look:
Generalplan Ost
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost

1
1
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago
It’s Wikipedia nonsense – if they did move German people east it would have been into unpopulated regions, similar to the Volga Germans

5
0

@RonP1
2 days ago(edited)
There’s a fair bit of information on the link below – it states “There is no indication that this plan was ever given official approval in full by either Himmler or Hitler.”
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=90383
Wikipedia’s page is complete crap designed to bolster the official story ie if you believe the official story you’re likely to believe that too.

4
0
VapourLynx
15 hours ago(edited)
Wikipedia is the worst for NS info because it always has the post-WW2 anti-NS victors’ spin on it. Go search Karl Radl on x/twitter, who is basically as knowledgeable about National Socialism as you can get, he has a recent post about it.
And I’d just say, even if there were some actions the Germans took that were disagreeable, that doesn’t mean that the general ideology or ‘world concept’ was bad. It doesn’t mean you have to drive East or make an anti-Slav statement. There were plenty of geopolitical tensions between Slavs & Germans even pre-NS, which includes WW1 & the German territory cut up after WW1. There was even mistreatment & expulsions of German minorities in the Soviet Union prior to Hitler coming to power.

3
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Those allergic to a Swastika are Not welcome in my foxhole.

11
0

@Deanfranjek
2 days ago
NS is the only solution to this current mess .

11
1
Hide replies

@Rickyboy
2 days ago
ive said that time and time again

2
1
The Pork Report
3 days ago
The holohoax is crumbling.

10
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
The holocaust myth is shaking

10
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Keith Woods definitely gives off subversive rat vibes to me, 100% support Joel and what he stands for.

9
2
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Some humanity wouldn’t kill you. Hitler pitied the Palestinians publicly and in writing.

12
5
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Some Nats like appearing as monsters.
Mark was right this evening.
We are consistent with Nationalism or we are fkn frauds.

8
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
1 day ago
It is correct to have behavioral norms and reciprocity expectations from those who expect our support. Killing children with bombs is unacceptable as is sending your men to our country to stab our children and rape our women, then refusing to repatriate these elements, as most Arabs do to us.

Stefan
17 hours ago
I wounder what his opinion would be today if he could see modern Europe…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
If the answer to an existential crisis is not revolutionary, then it isn’t an answer. You cannot accept that Whites are on the brink of extinction and at the same time insist that the response should be as polite and acceptable as possible. It makes no sense. Conservatism is poison.

9
0
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago
The problem is, nothing in this world is forever. It can be that whites dont exist forever, or non whites for that matter. Or some in between. Its not just a given.
At the end of the day its about does the organism have the will to survive. Can it survive and adapt to the environment. We have adapted and survived the extreme cold. Can we now adapt to surviving the hostility of invading non whites against us. We have done and survived that too before. So the odds of us surviving this time is pretty high. The question really is what is the best method to adapt and survive this. More research and streams should be done about how we survived before.

1
0

@Uncle_Anon
2 days ago
“Resurrected”
It never “died” it is a System of governance that was tried once and it was a miraculous success and seemingly the natural form of governance for Whites. You better hope you can…

8
0
renunciate
2 days ago
I agree with Joel in that we have to focus on our people where we are.

7
1

@Grumpole
2 days ago
White people have been poisoned by the jew into believing that they are the problem, when facts and history says the jew have always been the problem. Until Satan and his Synagogue of evil is neutralised nothing will change for the good.

8
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Sieg Heil!

8
1
The Goyim Report
3 days ago
the answer to 1984 is 1933

9
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
all other races only care about their own. so must we

11
3
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago(edited)
Obviously those europeans that come out of this extinction/bottle neck event, or rather that survive to build anew, will be much less pleasant and much less humanitarian europeans. Likely even quite selfish and violent dickheads. But thats nature taking its course. And it will take its course and shape the new survivor european man. He will be strong, violent and merciless, unlike the modern european man.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
$1.88
Perhaps what’s happening here is that figures on the right are struggling with the terrible truth that is crystalising in front of them: there is no parliamentary or democratic way out of the crisis of modernity. NS is necessary precisely because it is revolutionary.

8
0

@Spartanwarrior
2 days ago
i agree with Joel. Mark is living in the past

8
1
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
You think the guy trying to revive the 1930s is the one who’s not living in the past? Staggering take.

0
1
Hide replies
Asadafa
1 day ago
Grab onto something! Trying to destroy lies about the past in the present, given the significance of the past event and doctrinaire handling of the historical lies at present, is critical at present. Controlling the teaching of the past right now is current and it is critical to our future.

@atexian
2 days ago
Good debate! I do agree with Joel, we have finite resources, both mental and physical, we need to be strategic and focus on the singular goal of White unification first. Once we have unity and political power, maybe we can stretch out into other things.

6
1

@jfreedom1350
2 days ago
What is truly remarkable is the fact that people from all parts of EARTH are now intuitively thinking the same thing and seeing the same issues. The subversive powers that be currently are aware of this and their campaign to dissuade people across the planet is abundantly clear. The very act of ‘them’ doing this is what is waking people up across the globe.

7
0
King Tut
2 days ago
when it comes to politics, Joel is 100% on point!

7
2

@Smidolf
3 days ago
A Bosnian is still a European.

7
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I don’t consider Albanians european even tho they are white and on the continent.

0
5
White Minority
3 days ago
revising the holohoax is the only way to go

7
0

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Jews control, fund and direct the mainstream right throughout the West. This is especially true of Great Britain. See Sargon, Robinson, Fox, Farage, Hopkins, Reform, Hopkins, Musk, possibly Homeland and many others

7
0

@YeGadz
2 days ago
Joel is 1000% correct, white identarianism is the only way out of this shit, no amount of collaboration with other groups is fixing it. And he is right we are weak, and cuck to our liberal priors for optics.

5
1
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
I think what Mark doesn’t understand is that the original national socialist were able to be polite and have good relationships with other nations and races because they weren’t dealing with them in their home countries

6
0
Hide replies

@Mushriks
2 days ago
Other nations and cultures yeah… does that include Eastern European nations too?

Hide replies
Long Knife
2 days ago
yes
“Just as England looks after its interests in every corner of the earth, modern Germany, too, shall know how to look after and protect its – albeit much more limited – interests. And these interests of the German Reich include protecting those German Volksgenossen who are not, of their own power, in a position to secure for themselves on our borders the right to general human, political, and weltatnschaulich freedom! In the fifth year following the first great foreign policy agreement of the Reich, it fills us with true satisfaction to be able to say that, particularly as regards our relations with the state with which we would perhaps have the greatest differences, not only have tensions lessened; moreover, in the course of these past years, an ever friendlier rapprochement has come about. I well know that this was due first and foremost to the fact that, at the time, Warsaw did not have a Western parliamentarianism but a Polish Marshal who, being an outstanding figure, sensed how very significant a lessening of German-Polish tensions was for Europe. The work of that time, which many questioned, has proven itself in the interim; and I may well say that, when the League of Nations finally abandoned its unremitting attempts to cause disruption in Danzig and furthermore appointed a new commissioner who was a man of personal stature, this very spot that presented the greatest threat to European peace lost its dangerous significance.
The Polish nation respects the national conditions in this state, and this city and Germany both respect Polish rights. Hence it was possible to pave the way for an understanding which, starting with Danzig, has been capable of completely removing the poison from the relationship between Germany and Poland, transforming it into one of truly friendly cooperation – despite the attempts of troublemakers here and there.”
~ Adolf Hitler
from Reichstag speech of February 20th, 1938
Less

1
0
Pure
2 days ago
Lets not pretend that ns germany was some humanitarian superpower. Its was highly organized militaristic superpower wanting to expand.

1
2
Hide replies

@Jiveturkey0001
7 hours ago
So?

1
0

@Jiveturkey0001
7 hours ago
Yes. And also because they actually achieved a level of strength and power that allowed them to COMMAND respect from those other races.

Drake
3 days ago
I agree with Joel. White people need to look inwards and focus on our own above all else in order to throw off the Jewish shackles which will in the end eliminate their power and ability to do what they do re expanding Israels borders unopposed in the first place.

5
1
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
middle east conflicts belong to the middle east….let them sort out their own shit. No more money or military from White nations

6
0
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
$5.00
People are open to Europa being fact checked but Keith was saying bad faith stuff like, Hitler was anti-Slavic, and Jews don’t have a monopoly on central banks or global finance. He was parroting Wikipedia. I suggest a 2 on 2 bare knuckle boxing fight – Mark and Joel VS Keith Woods and Alek Yerbury

6
0

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
Yeah, “Nazi” = “Gas chambers” for the Eternal Normie.

5
1

@TRNSAU
2 days ago
Mr Davis is 100% Correct.

5
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Rockwell worked with them because they were there in front of him. There’s no reason to pretend they don’t exist.

5
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
You have to deal with the situation as it is. Since non-Whites are often racially aware, you can have the peaceful separation discussion with them.

6
1
Kevin
3 days ago
Tucker is another Thiel nationalist

5
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
What’s even the point of WN when all it’s young members are spiritually negrified

6
1
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Conservatism is anti-national and anti-White. It’s the most despicable ideology in Western politics.

4
0
HH
2 days ago
If NATSOC won Israel and the jews wouldn’t have one third of the power they wield over the West today. NATSOC does not need to appeal to or beg mulsims about anything.

4
0

@MalteHenryk
2 days ago
To have sympathy for other peoples isn’t making their cause your own.
Being a nationalist doesn’t mean you can’t cooperate with other groups for a common (!) cause.
I don’t believe that’s very pragmatic or a winners strategy but that won’t stop online goofballs who are more interested in letting of steam rather than actually changing something in RL.

5
1

@RonP1
2 days ago
Colin Jordan’s ‘The National Vanguard – The Way Forward’ is a must read for NS’s
https://odysee.com/@RonP1:8/the-national-vanguard-the-way-forward-colin-jordan:e

4
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
“Homosexual and gay” are code words for: Perverted Queers.

3
1
AWIVR
3 days ago
$3.00
cheers mark and joel

4
0

@VikingBro
3 days ago
Joel Davis \o I recognize myself in him. There was years when I never laughed or smiled, because of how serious I feel about the struggle. \o

4
0

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Can I question when chimneys were built?

4
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
third reich was a success, we are still here today because it

4
0
Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago
$5.00
Hail Joel! Complete agreement with Joel. Generic “nationalism” will never work.

5
1

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Mark and Duke are very experienced and should be listened to here

3
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Cucker Tarlson is an overpaid Coward.

4
0
Son of Mars
3 days ago
We get called Nazis for wanting white countries anyway. Go through em.

4
0

@RonP1
3 days ago
Globalism is just the new term for Internationalism

4
0

@Loke
1 day ago
At about 1h45m: The question of taking sides in the Israeli genocide. Joels third position is a bit like; I don´t care when evil triumphs.
Peaceful separation would need a Palestine for Palestinians to return to, and a Syria for Syrians, not a growing zionists tumor fully supported by treasonous western clown puppets, seen by Arabs and muslims as representing white Europeans.
Being supportive of a Palestinian homeland does not contradict our claims to our lands, it is actually the moral stance to take.

3
0

@MaDaZi
2 days ago
Never thought i would write these words but… Mark seems to have a loser mentality, like a centrist. That won’t save the white race. Have to rethink my entire view of Mark now.

6
5
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
You should look up a guy called George Lincoln Rockwell, by your standard he was a centrist with a loser mentality.

4
0
JohnDuly
2 days ago
Joel Davis is really becoming a huge figure in all of our lives. This from a boomer in New Jersey. God bless the both of u and a growing number of other proud committed strong white men!

2
0
renunciate
2 days ago
The St George’s flag seems to be familiar and stir the soul of the British. Why reinvent the wheel? Use what you’ve got.

1
0
Hide replies
Cù Fhoirthe
1 day ago
There are about 7-8 million native “British” people for whom the St George’s is not an ethnic symbol, and is even a foreign one.

renunciate
1 day ago
, I probably should’ve written “English” rather than British. I’m sure you also have a regional flag that would serve as a nationalistic symbol. My apologies, as I clearly mis-spoke. My excuse is “murica”

@GazChamberz
2 days ago
A ‘neonazi’ demo in Berlin on Saturday was led by a Turk! We should support Palestinians because the Zionists use anti Muslim propaganda to reinforce their own power. The ADL says half of humanity is antisemitic, who is to say they won’t use Trump to witch hunt anyone who they deem antisemitic??

3
0
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
I think it’s really unfair for Mark to keep bringing up the dude with tattoos on his face that was a big debacle I get it but it was a one-off that dude is not representative in fact he was probably a plant

4
1
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
That’s just disillusionment on your part. Present the wrong image and you lose people, like it or not. Oh, and why does every misguided person on the Right have to be a plant? You’re kidding yourself if you really believe that.

Lamps
2 days ago
Mark, you’re a legend

3
2
Smoothie
2 days ago
nationalism is the natural default mode of all nations, but our people’s natural instincts has been subverted, it’s like they are in a cult, if you look at the achievements the liberal commie bastards have had it’s because they are unapologetically radical, the more radical they are the closer they get to their goals, nationalist need to be as unapologetically radical as the liberals, moderateness gets you no where

3
0

@popovacianen
3 days ago
im a nazi and seeing palestian kids blown up pisses me off and im not lying so what ever

3
0
Hide replies

@selly
1 day ago
yes you’re white. Palestinians on the other hand dont give a flying f*ck when white kids are ran down by a semi trailer in France

3
1
Hide replies

@popovacianen
1 day ago
well my morality does not change just cuz somebody else is retarded

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
wow mark is not correct on this at all

3
2
The Pork Report
3 days ago
Whites are too nice already. Non-Whites haven’t earned any right to interact with us.

2
1

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
lucas gage saw pretty brutally on twitter that theres no reciprocity or one struggle. all the muslims told him to get fcked when he tried to get them to sympathise with any form of white nationalism. they dog piled him

3
0
Hide replies
Stefan
1 day ago
I hope people saved screenshots and archived links of when they dog pilled lucas gage.

1
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
We aren’t asking for their help, we’re telling them what we are doing to make it so they don’t come into conflict with us as we move towards our goals.

3
0
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
kanye good example..White Lives Matter tshirt revenue went to Blacks in need

3
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
the key is not in “not scaring” the women, its in giving them confidence in your strength and resolve

4
1
Hide replies
Teutonic Truth
1 day ago
DUKE is Six Millions times The Man you, trump, and farage will ever be.

1
1
Hide replies

@LottaSense
1 day ago
Wow, you sure are an old, idiot boomer.

0
1
Counter-Currents
3 days ago
Many liberals don’t fundamentally disagree with the far Left. Conservatives really don’t agree with National Socialism.

4
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
NeoBolsheviks prefer to say Global because they intend to delete the word and existence of Nation.

3
0

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
efficiency and hard work was German way. Soft pleasure seekers were not the German way back then. Now days not so much

3
0

@Germanicus
21 hours ago(edited)
You know who did care about the Palestinian cause because it aligned with their own? You know who did have diplomacy with Iran? You know who did ally with Japan and called them “honorary Aryans”? You know who did build a multi-ethnic ideological army to fight the greater enemy? The German National-Socialists.
The fact these walking talking Hollywood cartoons like to highlight their most morbid takes on the televised jew-orchestrated genocide in Gaza and think that’s somehow gonna win people over, is mind-boggling. Unless of course, they’re bad actors and know what they’re doing.

3
1
Hide replies
Stefan
17 hours ago
I wounder what the opinions of the old german NSs would be today if could see modern Europe…

@NoFunZone
1 day ago
its crazy to me that your average black has much higher in-group preference than the top 2% of whites(the actual nationalists). whites really do seem to fetishize the outsider.

1
1
Mr
2 days ago
I hope your son is allowing you to get good nights’ rests, Mark!

2
0
DaisyS
2 days ago
Mark Collett point to a time in history when Muslims cared about a white country or any white people. Your virtue signalling is pathetic

4
4
Hide replies

@selly
1 day ago
EXACTLY !! As i said muslims are quite happy to work with jews when it suits them. Moors and ottomans as examples. Do they have any remorse or care for the suffering of the people of Europe? No. Infact they celebrate it and wish to do it again in Europe.

4
0
Htrac
2 days ago
Agree with what Joel says from
1:37:12
. I am getting really sick of the “based Muslim alliance” and how many people in the nationalist and “far right” circles will criticise and insult you if you object to Muslims in your country or say they should be deported – and even more bizarrely, they call you Jewish (Fuentes, groypers, Lucas Gage, David Clews etc).
It’s a ridiculous position to be bargaining from, that we need the support of the invaders to get our countries back and we should overlook the horrible crimes they’ve done to us because we “need” them to be on our side. Disgusting.

2
0
Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Mark’s audio is a bit off here.

2
0
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
Yes, very unusually so. Mark’s usually spot on with the technical stuff, and it’s the guests that have problems, but that’s flipped on this stream.

– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
2 days ago
The Israel-Palestine thing is so tiresome. If Jews and Arabs want to kill each other in the sand let them have at it, they’ve been doing it to each other for centuries, and in ten thousand years they’ll still be killing each other in the dirt whether they’re using American jets or sticks and stones, the very bible some of you pro-Palestinian types thump so vehemently is a catalogue of the middle east’s centuries of ceaseless barbarity.
If you think Palestinian immigrants from the conflict are bad, what will you think of Israeli immigrants when they start fleeing the sinking ship? The sad truth is that regardless of who wins, Europe loses.

3
1
Sulla
2 days ago
This is an excellent conversation

2
0
Will O’ The Wild
2 days ago
1488th comment

2
0

@RiseAgain
2 days ago
It’s easy to over-intellectualize everything when you’re as smart as Joel is, so appreciate his unwillingness to indulge in that. Embrace the basics. “Grug-brain” nationalism.

2
0

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
I have moved on. Into community building. Stalking normies as a bad guy is not my bag. Money and time can be better spent on people who seek me. There is the internet and search tatics for people who care about nationism.

2
0
MasterOfStf
3 days ago
Great stream

2
0

@Esau
3 days ago
we will be victorious, folks! We’ll come out of this stronger and wiser than ever before!

2
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Teach your kids about the birds and the bees, and the Negroes with STD’s!

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
ya it was a great stream. Joel is the man

1
1
AWIVR
3 days ago
never relax chat \o

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
unit 8200 in this chat for sure

1
1
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Muslim and Jews are cousins let them have a family fight. White people have to unite around our Race First 1488

2
0
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
Ummm..During World War II, there was collaboration between some Muslim leaders and the Nazi regime, notably Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who spent time in Berlin and met with Nazi officials to discuss shared interests against Allied forces.

1
0

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I cant figure it out. That beard is sus

1
1
Kevin
3 days ago
Mark kills them with kindness it’s awesome

1
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Joel supports a Nazi Azovs fighting Russia and China but fu@k the Palestinians

4
3
Kevin
3 days ago
this is great

@MarkCollett

2
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$3.00
I dont ask. I just say increase the vril lets go. keep on doing great work joeal

2
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Good man Mark

2
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Dead palastinian children and white people being outraged does not stop the jew, white people uniting will.

2
0
Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE

2
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
The challahcaust narrative was not implanted through arguments but through a thorough media campaign of dacades

2
0
Kevin
3 days ago
shabbos rogan audience will figure it out , most ppl watched Alex Jones vs Dr Duke to get here

2
0

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Jewish youth like to wear beanies. Its a cryptokippah

1
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
altruism ONLY for your own race

1
1
Kent
3 days ago
jews arent part of the human race

1
1

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
Palestinians don’t give a shit about the plight of Europeans

2
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
It’s called National Defense for good reason. The ME isn’t Our Nation.

2
0
The Pork Report
3 days ago
Oh, FFS, I don’t care about the Palestinian kids. What about the White children getting raped by muslims, Mark?

1
1
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark is strawmanning now

1
1
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
it almost feels like Mark is purposely misunderstanding Joel

1
1
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel is totally right

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
BULLSHIT Mark

2
2

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
People like Mark are invaluable, not to say that Joel isn’t, but you should respect Mark’s experience in this.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’s a self-sabotaging argument that nationalists should have no humanity. If you don’t have humanity, what moral authority can you have? How can you ask others to follow you? You have to have the moral highground if you expect to be heard.

2
0

@JupiterFive
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
Lack of empathy is lack of humanity and against ns.

2
2

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark is doing the mainstream thing “hurr, let me paint you a clown version of a national socialist and let me show you based on that why you are wrong.”

1
1
The Pork Report
3 days ago
JOEL IS CORRECT. Plus I don’t give a F about Palestinians.

1
1

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
average Palestinian will say “inshallah Britain will be muslim 2080”

2
0
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Firm disagree with Mark

1
1

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
whites cant be seen as some kind of stewards of all life on this earth. thats extremely dangeous to us. and unfair to have such a massive weight on our shoulders. we must be racially selfish. care about our own. the rest need to look after themselves. not our problem

1
1

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark is on a losing position on this here…

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL boomer

2
2
Blankeon
3 days ago
We cant respect our occupiers

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
David duke style cowardice

2
2

@Mitch
3 days ago
$3.00
Hi great stream question to Joel you said you went to India as a teenager how come you went there?

2
0
Kevin
3 days ago
Dr Duke went to Iran and other countries to speak

2
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
not in a million years will nonwhites “peacefully” gtfo

3
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
can thank jew worship 100% for the pussification of the White Race

4
2

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Hollywood style clownish “Nazis” are just as bad as nerds in suits. Genuine national socialist ideology is not problematic

3
1

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
$20.00
#Starfieldteam

2
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
$5.00
There’s one thing missing from this conversation and that’s Keith – do you think he’ll do a stream with you about this? he seemed to indicate he wanted to put this to bed in his Substack piece today so maybe not.

2
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@popovacianen
I think we have come quite far in the last 10 years

2
0

@Wolf
1 day ago
I agree with Joel, it’s much easier to be friendly with other species, when they live in there on nations, but it’s and completely different reality, when they invade our country’s and live amongst us.

1
0

@Operation_G
1 day ago
White monster :thumb_up_1:

1
0
mr
1 day ago
Totally agree with Joel on caring nothing about Israel or Palestinians, as for our government causing wars they can also say no to refugees, we don’t have to let them in because no one else does. I agree with Joel that mark hates Jews so much that anyone who opposes them must be lauded. Islam etc hate us and will replace us if given the chance , we must only care about our own , we may sympathise at innocents being harmed but where is the outrage over the genocide of Christian’s in the Middle East , nothing , so this shows Joel’s point perfectly because Mark never mentions their plight.

2
3
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
Don’t misrepresent me, I have done numerous shows about Christians being slaughtered in Syria thanks to Israel’s policies.

5
1

@Callout
2 days ago
looks like Joel is trashing liberalism because it clashes with National Socialism’s core: authoritarian control and suppression of individual rights for the “common good” of the state. Nazis pushed a twisted “collective” vision, subordinate yourself to the Führer and the racial Volk. Whereas liberalism champions personal freedoms, which they saw as chaotic or degenerative. The “common good before people” vibe fits National Socialism’s propaganda.Joel’s hitting liberalism to prop up that collectivist, anti-individual streak.

1
2
Through it, not around it
2 days ago
Signing up to play war games in non-White countries is just way to create more non-White “refugee” immigration into White countries. That’s a fact. So if you’re a dome MAGAtard and you hate non-White “immigrants”, signing up for the military is about as retarded as it gets because it is precisely the foreign actions of White militaries that helps Jews and Jew-adjacents to increase non-White migration. But that’s too hard for a MAGAtard to understand.

1
0

@Evola19
2 days ago
Keef is a joke

1
0
Vid
3 days ago
Many people making the same comment about Joel has a Jewish Telegram mod. Hitler had a Jewish doctor and Jews served in the German military so whats the problem having a random Jew as a friend?

0
1
Hide replies
Pure
2 days ago
Or random black or asian ?

0
2
Shamrockshake
3 days ago
why are people accusing him of being a fed?

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Sermon on the Mount morals + materialist hedonism is plaguing the White race ATM imo

1
0
Callaghan
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
100% 0/

0
1
ToffeeL10
3 days ago

@Smidolf
European cowardly traitors who cucked to Ottomans

1
0
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
joel rolling his eyes like a teenage girl is very funny

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago

@fixdsm
How’s the weather in Tel Aviv, shlomo?

1
0

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
England has an unspoken language of politeness the subtlety of which can be lost on foreigners. Especially if they are Australian.

0
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@Manintoga8888
It took Australian Abbos 10,000 years to invent the stick…and they didn’t even invent it.

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is the real Race First

1
0
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Australians are very retarded on the whole

0
1
Son of Mars
3 days ago
$5.00

1
0
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
the groomers were the ones “inciting racial hatred” through their own actions

1
0

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
it’s never good enough for them and reciprocity is alien to them. Helping them is seen as weakness.

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Canada = New India

1
0
Drake
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
rediculous, he was in a FB group when he was 14 and got kicked out for having the wrong opinions, that isn’t joining Antifa lol

1
0

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
I can’t think of a worse country to visit than India

1
0

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
well joel was in antifa before he became NS, so not as wild as u think

1
0
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
yeah, l say that on a vid from Joel himself.

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
NAUR

1
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Traveling made me extremely pro white and racist in a good way.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Hitler was anti-imperialist for that exact reason.

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
White strike worldwide

1
0
Shamrockshake
3 days ago
love how the church ignores the underprivileged in their own nations.

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Outspoken AntiChrists might as well be SatanicJeews and many are.

1
2

@Esau
3 days ago
hahaha am I really supposed to believe that the international jewish banking families like the Rothschilds gave up some of their wealth to gentile bankers?!

1
0
ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
Ignoring what Israel has been happening in the middle east for 80 years is the best way to help white people?

1
2
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
germans are the true israelittes

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
Positive Christianity was 100% Biblical

0
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
Positive Christianity was not Biblical.

2
1
Hide replies
Carnegie
2 days ago
I think you’ll like the new movie Heretic. I watched it yesterday and thought it was really good. It, surprisingly, stars Hugh Grant, but the dialogue is excellent and whoever wrote it really knows about religion. So probably a jew lol.
Don’t look up what it’s about, just take my word on it.

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the catholic pope created the third reich, there will be no fourth reich without the pope

0
1
Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
we are having dead white children by none whites. I have never seen any none whites come out and support the white race

1
0
LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
illegal in Canada as well

1
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich was a success and it refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
1
Drake
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
1. It wasn’t Catholic, 2. It hardly failed, it was the most sucussesful attempt at throwing off international jewry and providing a new path forward for europe

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
Maybe Tom Sewell will debate Sven on raw milk next ? eh team ?

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
The Third Reich “Failed” from the OUTSIDE i.e., tons of nations ganging up on them. The ideology and policies of it was sound.

1
0
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
of*

0
1

@Smidolf
3 days ago
We just need the Americans not to intervene.

1
0

@KeepAskingForTruth
3 days ago
$5.00
Test it

1
0
Kent
3 days ago
care for your race is emotional. quit being an autist.

1
0

@Smidolf
3 days ago
English grils get raped after helping Palestinians, come on Mark.

1
0
Stefan
3 days ago
Mark :thumbs_down: – Joel :thumbs_up:

1
2

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
Mark loves bluegums. Opinion dismissed.

0
1
Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Mark knows his Nationalism

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
my Palestinian neighbors never called me goy

1
0

@JupiterFive
3 days ago
Mark has far more experience in this area than anyone here.

1
0

@frog.eyes
3 days ago
EUROPA FIRST BITCH!

1
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
catholicism is the seat of white power, the fourth reich refers to the fourth holy roman catholic empire

0
1

@Chris
3 days ago
Wow, bad take from Mark on Joels x ban, Joel wasn’t banned because hes ns… joel was banned because hes anti-jew.

1
0

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Its because he is Prowhite

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
was supposed to be an upward arrow

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
putting any trust in nonwhites is not smart

2
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@LottaSense
I bet you’ve listened to thousands of hours c rap cadence.

2
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
look how that worked out

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Join The Great Shunning of Alien Stalkers.

1
0

@GaelicNord
3 days ago
we must be racially selfish. we must be racially exclusive. we must have a racially selfish centered sense of morality.

1
0

@01123581379
3 days ago
Since US is only 57% white the only way to really fix the problem is by having a constitutional convention so it says that Euros have to be more than 2/3rd of the country’s population.

1
0
Hide replies
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
that would be nice but I don’t see that ever happening

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
LOL. Mark loves his cursing

0
1
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Go Free! w/ CommonSense Nationalism

1
0
Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
At least we aren’t speaking Ebonics.

1
0

@Daniel
3 days ago
bitch ass nigga hoe

0
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Well said Mark

1
0
Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
$10.00
Hey Joel, Tom recently spoke on Keith Woods’ cringeworthy and humiliating and cringeworthy DMs that were leaked by an adult worker he caught feelings for, named Slayter. She dated rappers and was disowned by her family. Why did Keith court her and fall in love with her? Could you psychoanalyse this

2
1

@Mitch
3 days ago

@Glen19
Racism doesn’t have to be yelling racial slurs to be fair.

0
1
Louis Cachet
3 days ago
1920s commies probably were more “right wing” than today’s rightoids

1
0
Kevin
3 days ago
you don’t say the 14 words and then say “bad optics” : he’s relitigating the optics war

1
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We are far more schooled than any Nationalist group after WWII

1
0

@01123581379
3 days ago
Joel knows Christ Cucks are weak like Jesus

2
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
if you want the fourth reich in 2033, become a roman catholic papist

0
2
Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
MARK -SPOT ON

2
2

@LottaSense
3 days ago
he’s a race cucked coward

1
1

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL no its not

1
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

0
2

@Esau
3 days ago
Sounds like Joel listens to Alex Linder

0
2
Kevin
3 days ago
“Nationalists” pushing Azov are to be avoided

2
4

@Callout
2 days ago
No, that’s a leap. National socialism isn’t just nationalism with a social twist, it’s a specific ideology tied to Nazism, cooked up by the Nazis with all their baggage: racism, tyranny, and genocide. Nationalism today doesn’t automatically mean national socialism. lt’s not the same beast. You’re conflating a broad idea with a toxic historical invention.

0
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Your telegram moderator is Jewish

3
4

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Another one of these Viiking Adam Green totally not Jewish types

0
3

@Esau
3 days ago

@vettekid407
I don’t want to speak for Joel, but I think he’s been distancing himself from Christianity.

0
1

@Chris
3 days ago
again, conformity is your enemy here.

1
0
Enlightened Despot
1 day ago
100% agree universalism, which came into its own with the Enlightenment is the #1 problem, across the board, in philosophy, politics and in my area, the law.

0
1

@Callout
1 day ago
I’ve been listening to Joel Davis speak for about an hour and a half now, addressing his group of followers. This organization seems destined to fail. The online behavior of their leaders and members demonstrates an inability to engage in respectable conversation, whether with people of other races or even those of their own. I consistently notice these individuals resorting to remarks like “You’re brown, you must be a Jew” and similar nonsense. It appears they can only be civil within their own small circle. This lack of basic conversational ability reveals the sort of people this group attracts. Regardless of what Joel claims, the leaders and members of this organization are incapable of participating in a proper debate or discussion on various platforms. I completely agree with Mark’s assessment.
Having listened to this for 90 minutes, it’s clear Joel continues to make one inaccurate statement after another. See my previous comments. Libertarianism and nationalism as enemies? Does Joel inhabit some fantasy world of his own? Anyone with a practical understanding of reality who watches this will likely think, “I had some reservations about joining, but Joel has resolved them, I will certainly not align myself with a group holding such distorted perspectives.

1
3
Hide replies

@Ol8Inch
1 day ago
Don’t get me wrong I want to like Joel dude but I have to side with Mark on this one. You can claim all day that we only need a small percent of white guys to radicalize to take the country back but it’s just simply not true. You need support from the normies. I know all these damn guys in the US talk all day about how only 3% fought against the crown but it was the fact that the vast majority of the people who weren’t fighting supported the revolutionary cause. The revolution would have never worked if the average everyday settlers would have supported the crown. I know he’s angry, shit I am too. But instead of looking at everyone who does or thinks something you don’t like as beneath you, you need to understand that we are all victims of this subversion. He himself was a fkn antifa fag for shits sake. Instead of acting like white power Jesus he needs to humble himself and start meeting people where they are. We can’t afford to alienate every single white person who does or says something we don’t like. Calling people names and attacking them is only going to ostracize the vast majority of people. That’s probably why his group can only muster up 50 people at a March.

1
0
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago
Mark Collett is a crypto Jew as well, so it is not surprising and PA is backed by an overt Ashkenazi jew named as Natty, Jason Kohne is another crypto agent.

3
5
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Its good you have hard done undesputed evidence to back your claims.

3
0
Hide replies
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago(edited)
Of course I have ..
Collett waves the Jew China Commie Flag

2
2

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
French and jews can look pretty similar. I’m guessing Mark has Huguenot ancestry. As for Kohne well….

Hide replies
LouisMarschalko
2 days ago(edited)
Must be another Kohencidence, same as Mr Antifa Joel Davis.

1
1
Captain Myles Keogh
2 days ago
Something not said is that Irishmen don’t need far right politics because they have traditional ethnocentric Irish nationalism. That’s were Keith is coming from.

1
1
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Why does Joel look like a Bum.

2
4
Hide replies
renunciate
2 days ago
Maybe he’s growing out his hair & it’s in a goofy-looking stage right now, so he’s hiding it under a hat? That’s what it looks like to me. You get a little peak at curls when he turns his head. Curly hair can be a wild mess as it grows out.

1
0
Hide replies
Vulpes Inculta
2 days ago
Dont know about curls, but he gives off hube pot smoking bum vibes with the way he looks and speaks. The beard also looks disgusting.

1
0

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
I want my government to stop killing people. Palestinians, Vietnamese, Iraqis I don’t care. It needs to stop.

1
1

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Mark is the best in the Anglosphere right now. We just had a major melt down in the Colonies here. White Nationalism is really not an option in the US. We need a different way. I think Brits could do it tho.

2
2
rex
3 days ago
johadhu davis-singh

0
2

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
lol I give Handsome Truth the credit for that one.

1
1

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
He’s jew-jacketing Joel, so he’s not acting White

1
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoels enemies always end up being Zogs enemies

2
4

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
Joels mods are just Alex Jones fans. Soros and Zelinsky are Nazis, the EU are Nazis and therefore they all are good.

3
4
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
whites were originally the only race on earth created by christ in his image

0
2

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Do Scandinavians ever have curly hair? My Khazar gene alarm is going off.

1
3
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
germans are the israelites of the bible

0
1

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
your lossing the audience Joel, quick play some gay anime to win them back

1
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Joel is a Fed! Pushing his psychopath nationalism. “Why should I care about dead children if they aren’t white” says Yoel Davis

1
3
Hide replies
Stefan
1 day ago(edited)
Where is the reciprocity? I have not seen Palestinians and other middle easterns condemn all the murders and rapes on Europeans. In my country(Sweden) they work closely with the left and they oppose a Swedish Sweden.

0
1
Siegkreuz
3 days ago
every white need to unify under catholicism, the third reich was roman catholic

0
2
Hide replies

@Callout
1 day ago
so this is all false then?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Nazi_Germany

1
0
Hide replies
Siegkreuz
1 day ago
(((wikipedia))) lol

0
1

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel is going to lead an aryan expedition to fight china over Taiwan

3
6

@fixdsm
3 days ago
What race is Joel?

0
3

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Thats a very Jewy mindset. Shekels for access goy. Khazar vibe alert.

0
3

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Hey Yoel Davis do you still have a Jewish AZOG supporting Janny moderating your telegram chat?

3
6

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Duke is obsolete for the current times

0
3
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we just need to copy the jews…become super tribal

0
3

@What3
3 days ago
The same strategy jews used against hamas is the same strategy they used against national socialism. On its own national socialism/facism wasnt able to bring down jewry, so jews helped it along, they DID NOT found these movements but they HELPED THEM ALONG behind the scenes. Same way hamas didnt know some of its funding was coming from israel/jews behind the scenes is the same way national socialists and fascists didnt know they were being helped along by their enemy. For example, benito moussolini worked with/for Mi5 before and druing ww1.

0
4
Hide replies

@What3
3 days ago
Damn, people dont get it, im not saying stay away from facism, im talking about being aware of the herzl strategy, dumbasses;
The anti semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti semetic countries our allies – 84, the complete diaries of thedore herzl, proof;
https://i.postimg.cc/9VrQhn4j/unknown.webp

1
2

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis loves when Aryans doe for zog in Ukraine

2
6

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Yea, Jimbo gots it. His psycopathy towards Palestinians reveals a non European genetic element

3
7

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis ” I am a national socialist and that is why I have Jewish telegram moderators

3
7

@Orkin_Man
3 days ago
Who knew, Mark won the debate

2
6

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis wants aryans to fight Russia and China but shits on Palestinians fighting Israel

5
9
Hide replies

@What3
3 days ago
He’s a good guy, he’s just not that bright so he cant see (or doesnt care) about contradictions, like any true purist.

2
7

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Nazi Joel with his Jewish Telegram mods

2
6
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
call out the persecution of Whites should be the focus..holocaust fake or not isnt needed for promoting prowhiteism

0
4
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Focus less on jews and non whites and focus more on our persecution is a better strategy..

0
4
Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
big mark W

0
3

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Im Italian. So non white. I can admit it. It was nice to hear from Adam Greens brother tonight

3
8
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Adam Green is good. Me like. I’m done with Christianity.

5
1
Hide replies
Teutonic Truth
1 day ago
AdamGreene should at least change his first name since he is averse to everything Biblical.

1
0
TheLastBoyScout
2 days ago
Italians are white but if you don’t wanna see yourself as such that’s fine but you don’t speak for all of us, clearly

7
1
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
3rd reich failed.. .we need better tactics

0
5

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I suspect he has genes from the Ukranian region

1
7
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
screw the holocaust..we dont need to even care about holocaust..just go focus on the victimization of White people directly

0
6
Hide replies
Long Knife
2 days ago
“From 1945 to 2018, the German government paid approximately $86.8 billion in restitution and compensation to Holocaust victims and their heirs. Germany has also identified Nazi-looted objects – including art works, books, and objects within larger collections – and has returned 16,000 objects to survivors and their heirs over the last 20 years. Thousands more pieces of looted art are still missing worldwide. Rising anti-Semitism throughout Europe including in Germany, and especially in former East Germany, coupled with polls showing the need to increase Holocaust education among Germany’s youth, highlight the importance of Germany’s continued dedication to fostering a culture of remembrance.”
https://www.state.gov/reports/just-act-report-to-congress/germany/
don’t worry, NWG & Co. will understand eventually…
“After retirement, Cameron and his wife visited Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial museum in Israel. He thought that the museum’s focus on the personal history of individuals and their stories led to a better understanding of the reality of the Holocaust. Then living in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 1988 he founded his museum with the help of philanthropist (((Daniel Bader))), having collected materials on the African-American experience in the US for many years.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Black_Holocaust_Museum
Less

3
0
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

0
5

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel Davis has a Jewish Azog telegram Mod

1
8

@Smidolf
3 days ago
but the palestinian children

1
9
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
OK..lets say Holocaust proven fake?So what?Doesnt make the persecution of our people less. .we need to just focus on white persecution period..screw the holocaust

0
8
TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

0
8

@fixdsm
3 days ago
But he is Jewish. You can tell from demeanor and antipathy

1
10

@Norman
4 hours ago
at least you got all your squibbly wibblies out & about

@Pelasgian
8 hours ago
Honestly, David Duke might be popular among non whites, but how popular is he among whites.

@dnhotd
11 hours ago
all these aspirations and grand plans are just big talk unless you can fulfil and solve the JQ. Can’t do that without gaining power and prominence first. Complete utter catch 22. Only chance is if you slowly and gradually move more rightwing until whites become a near minority and a widespread “awakening” occurs where total electoral and political revolution occurs

Abby Eagle
1 day ago
If you were travelling on a plane with a small child and the cabin should depressurise and an oxygen mask should drop from the ceiling – would you put the mask on yourself 1st or on the child 1st? If you put it on the child first and then you should go unconscious then who is going to take care of the child. You have to make yourself #1 and be like a navy seal before you can take care of others. Too many Westerners are putting themselves and their country second. (This is the NLP Meta Program Attention Direction Sort)
https://www.abbyeagle.com/nlp-coaching-resources/nlp-meta-programs.php

HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
The amount of basedness is off the charts with this one!

@Wolf
1 day ago
Yes, we need ourselves to help ourselves and not trust the invaders they are only here for there own good.

@Callout
2 days ago
around 24 min mark:
Joel, you’re turning reality upside down. Liberalism isn’t against nationalism, it often works with it. Look at liberal democracies like Britain or the U.S.: national pride plus individual rights, no problem. You’re twisting liberalism into some anti-nation bogeyman to prop up your National Socialist pitch. Nazis hated it for its freedoms, not because it kills national identity. That’s your spin, not the truth. you are flipping the world to fit your ideology.

@Callout
2 days ago
around the 20 min in the vid:Joel, you’re off base. Liberalism and democracy aren’t opposites, they often go hand in hand. Liberalism pushes individual rights and representative government, which fits with democracy’s core of people choosing their leaders. Look at liberal democracy: elections plus freedoms like speech. Joel, you might be twisting liberalism into something it’s not, maybe to bash it as weak or globalist. Truth is, they’re not enemies.

Roy Vey
2 days ago
1:01:13
– Very good!

eriksKanal
2 days ago(edited)
You have to cut the head of the dragon. The enemies weapon is the money. They do not have any power without their money. The solution is to create a new currency based on love instead of greed.

@UsilleekHunt
2 days ago
Why is Mark dressed as a Monk

Hide replies
Mark Collett
2 days ago
i love the oversized hoody

@chambleth5
2 days ago
ETLB is low-iq idiocy. It is filled with lies. If you like it, you like lies and your probably kinda stupid.

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Nick Griffen always seemed very credible to me. I’m loving Mark’s failure analysis of the BNP.

Hide replies

@RonP1
2 days ago
No, it was Griffin who started to steer the movement down the wrong road, check the piece below

1
0

@RonP1
2 days ago
Actually I’ve updated that as there was 6 pages, check the new one below
https://odysee.com/@RonP1:8/IMG_1151_IMG_1152_IMG_1153_IMG_1154_IMG_1155_IMG_1156:1

1
0

@Spectromancer
2 days ago
Thanks!

1
0
The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
big if true

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Callaghan might be the best Starfielder ?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
good anyway

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
lol , good one

@LottaSense
3 days ago
GO CALLAGHAN

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
Is Joel a Sikh!

Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I started wearing a beanie when I moved to the PNW. I really like having my ears covered.

1
1

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
test stream?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
IMPORTANT DISCUSSION

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
good stream

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
GREAT STREAM

@popovacianen
3 days ago
STARFIELDTEAM \o

@SonOfOdin
3 days ago
good stream

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
o/

Callaghan
3 days ago
14

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
o/

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
o/

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
o/

@LottaSense
3 days ago
GN o/

Kevin
3 days ago
14 & 88 o/ Heil

@Smidolf
3 days ago
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Blood and Honour

Kevin
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

Kevin
3 days ago
sinecure

AWIVR
3 days ago
can we get one last #starfieldteam from joel before he goes

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@fixdsm
you are White relax Brother

Kevin
3 days ago
this was kismet

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
:joy: :joy:

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
rent free

collatz
3 days ago
popular figures, each taking part of the correct view, and part of the wrong view, arguing with each other. can’t imagine a better way to stymie organization and effectiveness

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
we know yer both eskimos

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Great stream

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I’ve got that t-shirt in blue ha

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD is like a heat seeking missile zeroing on the target

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
well, since you asked

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
commie jew fed

@popovacianen
3 days ago
can i call joel a cunt tho

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
\\\ o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Thanks great stream, Joel you are great

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Great stream o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@LottaSense
o/

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Joel hasn’t even drank any gin during this whole show? Crazy.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I support Joel’s Adidas Classic wear

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Jimbo
any evidence ?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@fixdsm
You are not white

@Esau
3 days ago
Heil Joel and heil Mark! WFP!

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
There’s always one or two…

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
exactly

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
some real retards in here. light switch brains

Hide replies

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
Kosher switch.

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
SAS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@LottaSense
me too

@LottaSense
3 days ago
I’m old enough to remember the saying, “Death Before Dishonor”

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s a testament to you two that it didn’t degenerate into a monkey, shit slinging contest in view of the subject matter.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Total agree

@RonP1
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
bingo…blood brothers

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs arent attacking jews they are both the same tribe, fake fighting to get foreign aid from white countries

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Albanians tried it the hard way and look at them now, just another mongrel horde.

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
spot on!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Great conversation

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Great conversation, very good

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
I missed this, I’ll have to wind it back

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
SHUT IT DOWN

@Smidolf
3 days ago
They survived and stayed very blonde and blue eyed.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
attack and invite

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Tommys still got the balance to pay on his loans from Robert Shillman

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Would you rather have white Islam or brown “western” societies

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
I like Muslims in the middle east fighting zionist scum

@Esau
3 days ago
Based Charles Martel

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I want everybody to go back home so I can concentrate my hate on the French again.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Esau
look at their flag

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@Smidolf
bosnians arent a real thing you have bosniaks(muslims) serbians(orthodox) croatian(catholic)

@Esau
3 days ago
What’s with the Starfield lore? I’m in the dark on that one.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago

@Smidolf
why is it multiple choice? I don’t want either anywhere near me

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Lol this is like the rebellious adventurous son having out with his cringe out of touch Gen X dad

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
I found British humor to be alot dryer and clever, it might have gone over starfields head

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
I dare you to interview norm, mark ….interview norm, straight to jail

@Jimbo
3 days ago
Yoel is a nazi fighting Zogs enemies.

@Esau
3 days ago

@fixdsm
STFU

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
we have problems with other groups.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Joel is one of the best guys in this thing

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I rather live next to a Bosnian than to a Negro.

ToffeeL10
3 days ago
We can be civil with them, but we don’t need them speaking for us like Robinstein does

@RonP1
3 days ago
Kosher Nationalist

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
rainbow formally white countries u mean

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
never heard of joel before

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@fixdsm
joel looks scotish swedish mix, some sort of nordic viking

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago

@Esau
Yeah but they can carry sand and critters just fine.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Aussies, cultured thugs ?

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
british isles are my homelands too.

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Aboriginals built Australia, they carried all that scorched sand and venomous animals there for millions of years

Kevin
3 days ago
Aye up mates o/ too

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
all jannies are jews and masons tbf

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@LongKnife1934
lol

Long Knife
3 days ago
just wait till you get a couple beers in them

Kevin
3 days ago
are they all nuts

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
not even being mean

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
ive known many aussies to be fair

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@fixdsm
joking ?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@fixdsm
What about it?

Mr Iggs
3 days ago

@RonP1
did they invent the digareido?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@fixdsm
Welsh/AngloSaxon

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Muppet Nationalism team

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Abos turned Australia into a desert pooping all over the continent.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
the Jim Henson approach

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Good show, guys, great discussion

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
I want muh muney fukn

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
This has been a great stream tbf

Kevin
3 days ago
these Starfield guys are out of control like Randbot

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is a real one

@Esau
3 days ago
Do you accept HawkTuah coins, Mark?

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
if all Australian men were like JD Australia would be an ethno-state in 24 hrs

Callaghan
3 days ago
FUG YOU PAY ME

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Misers

Mighty_Whitey
3 days ago
pay up, bitch

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lol

AWIVR
3 days ago
pay what you owe chat

Drake
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
can you take your talking points back to 2017

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
You don’t have to “fake” that call-out to recognize its benefit to you.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Esau
it’s a nightmare

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
did an indian parasite eat your funnybone?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is the future o/

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
…and both the holohoax and Palestine are opportunities for calling out the people who persecute us.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Hail Davis

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
The Starfield Question

@Esau
3 days ago
INCREDIBLE India, saaar

@LottaSense
3 days ago
yes they do have curly/wavy hair too

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
cope

Callaghan
3 days ago
WHITE POWER JOEL 0/

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Question to Joel:Do you agree naziflags will only turn off most whites in general?and if so what flags will attract more whites to prowhiteism?Won’t flags saying “END ANTIWHITEISM” “END ANTIWHITE HATRED” etc. recruit MORE WHITES?Whats YOUR BEST flag for prowhite recruitment Joel?

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I love those that hate Israel and you should too, Khazar

@Lone
3 days ago
Correct.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Shamrockshake
It really is. Jeets are everywhere.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is solid

AWIVR
3 days ago
the starfield stare

AWIVR
3 days ago
More

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Manintoga8888
Kent ate his funny bones

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
joel hitting the chat with that starfield stare

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Maldric
Australians also did the Ocean dub of DBZ

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Good point superchatter

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
make it happen haha

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Australians are only interesting because of a shitty Bethesda game. sad.

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@Esau
the bible warns against tolerating fake jews, we havent been practicing that

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
Todd Howard owns Australia

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
what? was that meant to relate to the relevance of the holohoax?

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD waxes eloquent for half an hour or one word response… nothing in between, lol.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
#Starfieldteam

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
#Starfieldteam

@LottaSense
3 days ago
thats a messed up thing to say to joel

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
lol

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
ive never washed the feet of a pajeet imperial, can you say the same

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
turned out it had the opposite effect, lmao

0KT0BER
3 days ago
https://xcancel.com/Ehrenkrieg2

@glider
3 days ago
‘enriching’ lol

@Smidolf
3 days ago
USAID program lol

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
I also have it on good authority that aussies are light weights when it comes to drinking

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
doubleteamingfield team!

AWIVR
3 days ago
#STARFIELDTEAM

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@8BigMatt88
I miss the aryan death-stare he used to do

Australian Nativist
3 days ago
Let’s do this again fellas. This was tough, but worthwhile.

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
Acts 17 promotes nationalism, but beyond that the Bible doesn’t offer much in the way of good advice for Whites to defend our nations against invaders.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
no..Israel bombing kids is in the now and relevant..but again..Media antiwhite…Netflix antiwhite..Govmnt antiwhite is way more effective than even caring about Israel bomning..screw Israel..focus is on OUR PEOPLE and that we are persecuted

AWIVR
3 days ago
joel scaring the hoes

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
wp o/

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Jews are just another sort of sandnegroes believing to be especially important.

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
based stoic White man.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is just authentic. Wasn’t funny.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Joel is in WAR mode lol

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
JD dead pan humour

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Keep on topic. Drop the soap opera stuff

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
they are not connected to the bible

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
modern jews are from turkey

SublimeBraid
3 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Psychoanysis is jewish

Drake
3 days ago
Author of the book “Positive Christianity” was arrested and sent to a concentration camp on the personal orders of Adolf Hitler himself. lol

Son of Mars
3 days ago
An important step in destroying narrative control is to demystfy the enemy’s sacred cows. It helps that it’s built off of disprovable lies.

0KT0BER
3 days ago
lol

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
Exactly

@Smidolf
3 days ago
The only thing they don’t allow is Whites only.

Kevin
3 days ago
we were talking about this on Heel turn in 2019 Joel

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
o/

collatz
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
very much like saying “don’t look at israel bombing kids” …you’re just throwing important history that supports your perspective in the trash if you don’t look at people like Germar Rudolf’s work

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
this ^

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
It’s always worrisome when someone is just getting started and think they have it all figured out.

0KT0BER
3 days ago
For sourced facts on the spirituality of the Reich see:
https://xcancel.com/Ehrenkrieg2

@RonP1
3 days ago
So we have to accept complete BS, this = Great Britain in 2025

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
That’s why they made any discussion of it de-facto illegal.

Kevin
3 days ago
shabbos cracker

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
beanies are comfy

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Im getting Salty Cracker vibes off of this guy

@glider
3 days ago

@fixdsm
cool mornings right now

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
oh okay cool

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@fixdsm
early onset balding

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Mass exposure of the truth surrounding the holohoax needs to happen. Heavy handed Jewish censorship of the truth is not possible in the information/Internet age. The truth regarding this event needs to go mainstream

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s winter in Starfield

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@whitedrake
I know man, I’m just posting the raw on the source for the jew nonsense that gets posted here and elsewhere

Drake
3 days ago
https://x.com/DarkRavenVolk/status/1903426483944636689

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Why is an aussie wearing a beanie? Is it even cold down there?

Drake
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
lol:

@Jimbo
3 days ago

@Brutusch
Hitler cared about Palestinians you f*cking FED

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
good question

Drake
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
Gall is a Jew with an agenda

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
that axs well

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Richard Steigmann-Gall the former Director of the Jewish Studies Program published The Holy Reich through Cambridge University Press, which explored Nazi conceptions of Christianity in 2003

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Sven should do a cooking show

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It was the allies fault for destroying the supply lines

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Lmao, joining WN to save the Palestinians

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Does Keith still associate with Nick Fuentes? Is this the reason why he sounds more cucked now?

Kevin
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
110%

collatz
3 days ago
the first 50% of this regarding directness, totally makes sense. rejecting stances on and engagement w/ foreign policy I just don’t get

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
test it

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Keith is scared

Kevin
3 days ago
he will fold fast

@Esau
3 days ago
The Joel versus Drew Pavlou debate was great

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is a wimp

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Keith’s got cold feet maybe

Kevin
3 days ago
Are people retarded in Starfield ? what’s in the water there

Callaghan
3 days ago
Yeah DEBATE TIME

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
maybe randbots not a unique case

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
lol

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
are all Australians as dumb as randbot?

Kent
3 days ago
expsure. lol thats keiths mo. ally with catboy nick for the views
then tries to pull a moral fag argument

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Here is a JPOST headline from right now: “Gaza relocation plan begins: 70 Gazans depart for Europe”.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
o/

@fixdsm
3 days ago
This is why the Jews have no problem making non whites fear white nationalists.

@glider
3 days ago
Keiths strength is writing more than live debate

Cone of Silence
3 days ago
83% of Americans were opposed to going to war with Germany before pearl harhour

The Goyim Report
3 days ago
isn’t Keith and Nick Fuentes boyfriends

@Esau
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
1488 o/

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Purposefully misunderstanding Joel

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
Now I understand what Stryker was saying about these goofballs.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
yes. It’s not as though they extend the same to us. Why are Whites the only ones expected to partake in this sort of performative altruism?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
14 words says it all and 88 precepts

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Keith O’Brien?

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
moot point from mark, i agree with joel

Drake
3 days ago
that isn’t what Joel said lol

Kevin
3 days ago
different things work for different countries

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
It is not collateral damage. It is the deliberate and purposeful mass murder of innocent children, babies and civilians. We must condemn these demons. We should be appalled by what they are doing and getting away with

@fixdsm
3 days ago
I would never ally with someone without empathy for anyone other than their own small Jewy tribe

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I’m still pissed Albanians and Bosnian didn’t return home after the war.

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
Whites need to stop giving a f* about everyone else. SPECIALLY when WE already have more than enough problems to focus on

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
agree joel

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
But your country doesn’t have only white people, right?

@Esau
3 days ago
r/JoelDavisTheSupremeGentleman

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s tactical Joel

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Well said, Joel

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
think about two things st once? Joel cant hold all these limes

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Give me a break. This is antiithetical to whiteness

collatz
3 days ago
If 10 billion of your tax dollars per year were being sent to Perth to pay for this kid’s broken arm, yes, you should care about it.

Kevin
3 days ago
r/thejoel

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Kent
LOL

ViceVersaVice
3 days ago
They are going through them to get to you fool.

Kent
3 days ago
joel is a modderator on r/iameuphoric

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs wont attack jews they are the same tribe

Kevin
3 days ago
Arabs are like Hispanics they president is always Whiter than the population

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Oooga booga. Only my tribe matters

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The British made the bed of the Palestinians. Get a grip, Joel

@Esau
3 days ago

@Kent
How dare you slander God’s Chosen People!!!

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
you know what is popular? Being a cold psychopath weirdo.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Israel couldn’t do what they’ve done to Palestine without the money & militaries from our countries

@01123581379
3 days ago
Joel doesn’t get that we won’t get paid back from the jews leaching off white countries so it’s not just about killings

Kevin
3 days ago
most “Arabs” in Syria and Lebanon have White admixture from Britain and France Sykes Picot agreement era

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I remember my father showing us National Geographic journals with pictures from starving Negroes when we wasted food. I never cared about the Negroes lol

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Thats a very negroid mindset

The Pork Report
3 days ago
100%

@Chris

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago

@Chris
agreed

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
BASED

collatz
3 days ago
Do you think you can bring about “cutting them off” without engaging w/ the shit they’re doing in Gaza?

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
arabs and jews are the same tribe, they wont attcak each other

@Esau
3 days ago
Live Pay-Per-View event: Watching the Muslims destroy Israel hahaha

@Mitch
3 days ago
I didn’t expect to go this deep

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark should make a bigger and constant stink about white girls being raped in england, than whining about brown people in a third world country.

Kent
3 days ago
the moral argument is the only force pushing back against the jews in the west so far

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
So don’t try to make jews the Pariahs of the world by highlighting their crimes? Good thinking.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
treat others the way they treat you and your people

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
exactly

@01123581379
3 days ago
IF all arabs and jews died our world would be ten times better

Kevin
3 days ago
rational but people remember Joel was America First , he’s more hardcore now which is good

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Joel is right

The Goyim Report
3 days ago
Palestinians and Israelis wiping each other out would be the best outcome

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
We can’t care about terrible things all over the world.

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Its your money killing their children

Son of Mars
3 days ago
*matters

@01123581379
3 days ago
MOOOOOSLIM!!!

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
What Joel just said is what I think.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
o/

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
good point Joel

Australian Nativist
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Yes. They should have prepared better for this discussion. It

collatz
3 days ago
And if we’re basically going to recuse ourselves from any perspective on foreign engagement, we’ve just thrown the largest and most affective arena of politics in the trash. that’s absurd

@fixdsm
3 days ago
i

Son of Mars
3 days ago
We have to destroy our enemy to win. Israel is our enemy. Forget about Palestine, what to me as an American is Israel controls DC, and is essentially a foreign occupational force.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Good lord

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
Mark getting nervous

@01123581379
3 days ago
supporting Israel is not pro white

The Pork Report
3 days ago
We oppose the wars because they harm Whites, I DGAF about Palestinians.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
White people need to unite not divide over other races

Kevin
3 days ago
this is brothers talking past each other

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
you cant trust them if we want to make our own institutions and clubs

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
imo

@Chris
3 days ago
? What? what exactly is mark arguing here for? i feel like Mark argues past joel, joel is saying “My own country first.” and Mark argues “world police”???

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Obviously we don’t need to take EITHER side with other races’ conflicts.

Kevin
3 days ago
exactly you don’t want to go around making more enemies

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
Indianization of America is the best thing that could happen now. The pajeets will totally neutralize America’s ability to do the bidding of yids

Drake
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
you cannot help them without throwing off the Jew which requires focusing on ourselves in the first place

Callaghan
3 days ago
100% Joel TEAM WHITE

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Anglo compassion VS Aussie fire and heart

@01123581379
3 days ago
white countries need to stop being cowards and say they want white super majorities

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
all whites need to unify under roman catholicism, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Nah man, we should totally die for the Jews. Gods chosen after all

Kevin
3 days ago
maybe Starfield has different Arabs ? in USA they just run restaurants

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
I give a shit

Son of Mars
3 days ago
No, frame it as Israel is your enemy, has purchased traitors ans silences us with media control. They are the occupiers of our capitals in the west. forget the browns, that’s not what it’s about.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
White First thinking means we don’t fight for jews.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
both?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Is mark stupid or deaf?

Brosey
3 days ago
exactly, so screw it

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Hannity• Vance 2028

@LottaSense
3 days ago
now the world police is DEI

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Every decent nationalist should condemn the deliberate slaughter of innocent children, babies and civilians by Zionist Jewry. They are demonic scum who get away with deliberate mass murder because of their control of Western governments & the mass media

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Of course take our own side, but let’s exploit the enemies weakest front too.

@Mitch
3 days ago
3 hour stream? l

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’s getting a bit muddled.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Israel doesn’t deserve to exist because they can’t without the US

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE fug the nons….

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
but what would normus do?

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Well said, Joel!

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Israel is nothing without our help.

Kevin
3 days ago
left and right it’s 2025 ? they both are run by scum

collatz
3 days ago
…but the mainstream is retarded. What do you actually understand about the conflict?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NO! Nats are dif

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Joel is not wrong

Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago

@LottaSense

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Take our own side

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
100%

@01123581379
3 days ago
Iraq war stopped the US from having Mag Lev coast to coast

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@LottaSense
its the reason why people like Candice Owens are so successful

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is 100% correct about everything so far

Callaghan
3 days ago

@JupiterFive
Empathy for your Own kind is fine….

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel is essentially the occupational army. you have to defeat them.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
But why Mark?

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Why invest any emotion into foreign conflicts if we need it for ourselves.

Kevin
3 days ago
this reminds me of the debate where Moike schooled himfor 2 hours

@8BigMatt88
3 days ago
HUGE JOEL W

@Esau
3 days ago
Take things from jews, the winners. They operate based on moral particularism i.e., what is good for the jews is what is good.

Uncle A’s Ice Cream Shop
3 days ago

@SerenaJB

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I just care about the White race now.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Why are we complicating things? It’s so obvious the wooden door brigade = all the worlds problems

@LottaSense
3 days ago
sad that some White people are so afraid and paralyzed they think they need the approval and support of nons who hate White people far more than they will ever hate jews

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
But bad things are happening all over the world, we are very selective about who we care about.

Callaghan
3 days ago
I dont like seeing White Girls getting gang raped by the mongrel hoardes

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Whites first and only.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
I don’t care about the Middle East.

@Chris
3 days ago
“oh, let me whine about brown people in a country, that will help me in my country.”

Kevin
3 days ago
ghoulish

AWIVR
3 days ago
A10 aryan eyes

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
the CCP is a big problem to Canada as well.

@Mitch
3 days ago
Good points on both sides

@fixdsm
3 days ago
Has Mark commented yet on Joels beautiful eyes?a

@Chris
3 days ago
This is so tedious, We shouldn’t give a damn about brown people in countries that are not ours… we should care about asserting dominance, gaining power and recover our nations.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
All we have to do is defund the jews and refuse to fight for them, that will defang them.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Mark wins again

@Esau
3 days ago
R-tards still think Georgie Boy Bush was the one thinking up all those ME wars hahaha it was the jewish neo-cons under him.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Then they focused in on Ireland out of sheer spite.

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
whats with the whiny pouty tone all of a sudden?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel is a mortal enemy. You have to defeat them, politically or otherwise, to regain sovereignty.

Kevin
3 days ago
yeah

@collatz

collatz
3 days ago
But nobody other than y’all is framing this in terms of a fundamental emotional motivation. We just recognize how killing children is nasty af

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
get him

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Muzzies and Jeews don’t belong In Europe.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
The dominance of Israel in the ME comes from us not being in control of our nations.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago

@Esau
o/

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
more camera phones for both sides, let the tik tocker see who the real barbarians are…..

Callaghan
3 days ago
Empathy for Nons is Pointless////

@Clyde
3 days ago
Joel’s got this; Mark has experience but …this has got us nowhere

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Shut the borders and it’ not our fcking problem anymore.

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
Joel is on the right side of this, imo

collatz
3 days ago
“If it wasn’t Israel” …nobody said we don’t have a motivation to focus on this. Wtf is your point there Joel?

@Esau
3 days ago

@LiquidZ00
\\ o/

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
That’s right!

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
they’re not coming here because muh genocide….they’re coming here because jews and our traitorous governments

@RonP1
3 days ago
Let’s not forget the part the Jews dupes the Freemasons are playing in all this

@Chris
3 days ago
that is the issue here, holding firm on to things that didn’t work, don’t work and won’t work.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, MARK

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Pakistan was never bombed, yet they flood into England

Drake
3 days ago
White people need to look inwards and focus on our own above all else in order to throw off the Jewish shackles which will in the end eliminate their power and ability to do what they do re expanding Israels borders unopposed in the first place.

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@LottaSense
Exactly. Always appeasing.

Callaghan
3 days ago
FUG TEAM BROWN

Son of Mars
3 days ago
I hate Israel because they control our politicians, used us like mercenaries, silenced us and spilled our blood

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
we are not obligated to be the world police….folk first!

@LottaSense
3 days ago
beta males always want the easy way out

collatz
3 days ago
No, we’re not pretending. It’s genuinely messed up what happens there. I still care more about my own people. This makes zero sense.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
o/

@Chris
3 days ago
Nobody is saying go out with swastikas tattooed on your forehead… joel is saying, whites first, whites first, whites first and principles matter the most.

Callaghan
3 days ago
Brown Arabs raping little White Girls not siding with them…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
WEAK argument

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Fist you have to take your county back to be in control.

meaty
3 days ago
agreed

@glider
3 days ago
problem is you end up devoting your emotional and intellectual energy to someone elses problems

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
No, the likes of Dr Duke and Lucas Gage support Palestine because they understand history and are genuinely moral

@Chris
3 days ago

@jagdeepjano
yeah? what did marks experience achieve so far? right… nothing.

Kevin
3 days ago
Balfour agreement is enough reason to hate isreal , they killed American sailors and British soldiers

Man in toga – get it?
3 days ago
I like the Palestinians more than Australians. Palestinians never say shit like Nauurrr or make 50 different variations of the same cooking show.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@LiquidZ00
^

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
American jets

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
catholicism is the seat of white power, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
The average white guy you are talking about needs to be educated on the Palestine issue and global Zionism. Ignorant grug nationalists are useful idiots for the Jewish control establishment

@frog.eyes
3 days ago
its a tough debate, shame we’re seemingly stuck in the infighting stage forever

@Smidolf
3 days ago
I like how the Chinese deal with Moslems.

@Esau
3 days ago
Focus on what non-Whites are doing to innocent WHITES!

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@VrilPilled
Exactly.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
support are the folk

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s illegal to fight in isreal unlike Ukraine …….another point of contention

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Richard Steigmann-Gall the former Director of the Jewish Studies Program published The Holy Reich through Cambridge University Press

collatz
3 days ago
How does spending some attention on the horrifying shit that comes out of the Levant, and being genuine about it, immediately destroy your first-priority of your own people? That makes no sense.

Drake
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
other peopels nationalism / nationalism result isn’t our responsibility

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
very weak

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
how can mark even want to talk to muzzies after what they did to all of these british girls

@Prussnblk
3 days ago
Hard to say you stand on principle and also don’t care about genocide

@Chris
3 days ago

@Mitch
i hope not, because Mark is simply wrong on this issue.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
So, Joel, is your Nationalism not consentient?

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
kin first

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Aryan = Noble, and Mark has the noble outlook on this

The Pork Report
3 days ago
I’m so sick of Whites being exhorted to care about other races. They do nothing for us, and most of them hate us.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Then enemy of my enemy is my friend

@Mitch
3 days ago
Is anyone siding with Mark here?

Kevin
3 days ago
Real Politic = you have to deal with people you don’t like

@Chris
3 days ago
Mark seems to think that the weaker position and approach is the one doing the trick, it does the trick, it does the jewish trick of whites fading out.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark has the human, compassionate, Aryan attitude

Callaghan
3 days ago

@1690Sparky
0/

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Race First

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel has its boot on our throat. Anything useful in destroying the enemy is good.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Yes! Take our OWN side

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE JOEL

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Mark is giving off Farage vibes here.

@Smidolf
3 days ago
We can sell weapons to both of them.

Brosey
3 days ago
FIRST PRINCIPLES

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
i don’t see his argument as falling apart at all

collatz
3 days ago
Why should your White motivations for opposing isreael prevent genuine opposition to genocide by the same people you already oppose? how tf is that “faking”? and if it is wtf?

Drake
3 days ago

@Spozzfreund
100%

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
neither

Kevin
3 days ago
agree to disagree if you

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel is a man of principle. Is this so hard to understand?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
When have White nationalists ever been pushed into the arms of Tommy Robinson? It only works the other way.

@Chris
3 days ago
this is so stupid… Strawman arguments.

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
what???

Kevin
3 days ago
Isreal are killing kids on tv

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel delenda est Israel must be destroyed …The Israelis are the Red Coats in this revolution.

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
the problem is that these non-white antisemites are almost always antiwhite as well, and I would always bet those who claim they are not are liars

Kevin
3 days ago
silver lining

Drake
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
in return, palestinians living in the west will post anti-white content at the drop of the hat, we have all seen it

Kevin
3 days ago
it makes the Jews look bad to support Palestine

@Smidolf
3 days ago
Boers don’t like pedo anime crap.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Rand must answer for that

AWIVR
3 days ago
it got him into a huge breakup fight with Dingo over it

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AWIVR
Yeah fug That i luv the Boer 0/

Kevin
3 days ago
it’s about networking irl : Rockwell talked others

@LottaSense
3 days ago
holy shit

AWIVR
3 days ago
yes way lol

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Advocating for Palestine is the morally sound, nationalist position

@LottaSense
3 days ago
no way he said that

AWIVR
3 days ago
“I would rather have a Palestinian as a neighbor than a Boer” -randbot2020

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is mad at Moike ? ? ? wtf

@LottaSense
3 days ago
sounds like Mark is falling for the non with an outstretched hand while hiding the knife behind its back

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Look what happened after 3 children being killed the Muslims and none whites collectives against white people

Drake
3 days ago

@Brutusch
yeah what is the point of this, mark is banned too lol

Siegkreuz
3 days ago

@0KT0BER
why was it called the third reich?

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
There are plenty pro-white people on social media – it’s only the ones who name jewish power that get kicked off.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Mark is not engaging with what Joel is saying

Callaghan
3 days ago

@CosmicPepe
0/

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Kevin
3 days ago
they deported Jews from some South American country for grooming forget which one

@RonP1
3 days ago
Jews like to bet on all the Horses in the race

0KT0BER
3 days ago
hows it going Tel Aviv

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
(((antisemitic point of no return)))

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL dumb boomer

AWIVR
3 days ago
supreme gentleman

0KT0BER
3 days ago
The source of the ‘Holy Reich’ nonsense:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Steigmann-Gall

@Esau
3 days ago
hahaha Joel is an Eliot Rodgers appreciator?! JK

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
You get kicked off social media for talking about jewish power

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@LottaSense
You are Obsolete. I bet you have listened to thousands of hours of c rap cadence and pretend it’s music.

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
100%

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Oh, that’s worked so far, Joel

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
TEAM WHITE =no Mamzers

Kevin
3 days ago
BAP ppl & Luke Ford type NRx ppl are kosher antisemites

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago
Disagree. Uniting with other groups to defeat the Jews is sensible and what organized Jewry fears the most (the Protocols talk about this). Their power and grip is truly global. Myopic focus is not the solution

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I always come back and realise Mark was right

Kevin
3 days ago
14

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Israel delenda est.

@Esau
3 days ago
The vast majority of Whites who support Israel are doing it because their Bible and/or Churches tell them that’s how they get to heaven.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
LOL6

Kevin
3 days ago
keep your eyes on the enemy exactly Mark

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the catholic pope created the third reich, there will be no fourth reich without the pope

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
well, this is just stupid, sry.

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@GaelicNord
very good example

collatz
3 days ago
“we can’t talk w/ anyone until we have basically total power” …really?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
lol

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Lucas Gage is a mixed-up cuck.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
give them to carrot first, then the stick, understand?

Kevin
3 days ago
Who cares if people support Palestine, I don’t care about it. it’s an example of international Jewish power to the rest of he world though.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
We have tried all this none white crap. 1488 say it all

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Exactly, non-Whites are an energy drain. We DON’T need anybody else.

Callaghan
3 days ago
GO OFF KING!

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
quit naming CCG

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@BobMatthews
sadly you’re right.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
^

Callaghan
3 days ago
Eugene Terblanche work with black and they killed him…

Kevin
3 days ago
who’s Joel taking about ?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
they cannot conceive of honesty or honor

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
BLACK Marcus Garvey worked with the KKK to return Blacks. Have you lot read any Nationalist texts? Mark Collett

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
you seriously believe, that talks with non-whites will lead to non-whites agreeing for the deportation of their fellow non-whites?? thats just… any non-white will immediately think “ok, i can’t trust them, i will be definitely next, so i won’t help them.”

@Clyde
3 days ago
Joel is not larping – Joel knows the friend/enemy distinction – we are after our share of the pie from a position of power

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Shamrockshake
those schlubs hate to pass on inheritances to their children

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
You work with people who have the same interests as you do. Not with people who’s interests are in conflict with yours.

@Mitch
3 days ago
Joel responded well

The Pork Report
3 days ago
It’s ridiculous to expect White altruism from non-Whites.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@LottaSense
Absolutely.

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
exactly!!

collatz
3 days ago
“then we’ll sit down from a position of strength”…we’ll sit down once we’ve won. How American.

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
not all, not all, but most

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
100%

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Joel’s lost me here…

Kevin
3 days ago
you’ll need economic allies when you do take power

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
yes

WP Combat
3 days ago
I agree with Joel here.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Joel is right. We don’t need to worry about jews and other nons who will lie about us regardless.

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Blood and Honour

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
we need boomer money

@IberianVaelico
3 days ago
The game was rigged from the start. We’re not gonna win by playing by the rules created BY our enemies to keep US down.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
What’s the point of cosying up to non-Whites who are in our homelands?

@Chris
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
So, if you engage with brown people, you can convince them to leave peacefully?

@Esau
3 days ago
Lamp-post…or lampshade? lol

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
non-whites will never agree that they are a cancer. Pandering to them is pointless, especially rn

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
The People of Starfield must extend across the whole galaxy of nationalism

Kevin
3 days ago
Boneface type Hollywood acts

collatz
3 days ago
there’ll probably be places where exchange b/t White and nonwhite groups are relevant before anyone’s resiliently established too, but fine to say “as we’re ready / it makes sense”

BobMatthews
3 days ago
I say we need around 30% of Whites on the same page ideologically to start reversing the current trajectory..

The Pork Report
3 days ago
“Politeness” is how we got here. Optics cuckery.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@Chris
i think the point is if u engage with one you could end up convincing sending 100s back rather than sending 1 back or 1 family and that is the end of i, still in the same position

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
agreed Joel

@Chris
3 days ago
this is all blah blah and grasping at straws, we whites need to assert dominance over our own countries and we don’t do that by bending the knee to the browns.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
BLACK Marcus Garvey worked with the KKK to return Blacks. Have you lot read any Nationalist texts?

@MarkCollett

@Clyde
3 days ago
preach it Joel! White Power!

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
what did the TALK do? what came from it?

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
well said Joel

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Focus on our people first. I agree.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
We don’t negotiate with invaders

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
Wholesome chungus nationalism is not gonna work mark

Drake
3 days ago

@schintzellove
we are comparing to NSDAP, they didn’t have to face that

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is solid

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Mark did this when he had the SSNP on for a discussion, and they discussed the need for the Syrian refugees in Europe to be repatriated.

Kevin
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
National Socialist Front did that

meaty
3 days ago

@whitedrake
yes they do

@Esau
3 days ago
We should all wire money to Beijing, Moscow and Tehran
, and ask them to neutralize ZOG for us lol

Brosey
3 days ago
fundamentals first

Blankeon
3 days ago

@whitedrake
Exactly. Totally different situations.

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
worked nicely didn’t it? this is retarded, sorry to say, all you do is play the little cuck who tries to appease the bull.

@Clyde
3 days ago
no, no, no – I’m nothing but polite and legal and Iface threats and harassment everyday – organized harassment – no co-operation with nons

@glider
3 days ago
Exactly

Brosey
3 days ago
you dont worry about that until later

Drake
3 days ago
Germans didn’t have millions of non-whites living in their communities throughout Germany

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
yes Joel!

collatz
3 days ago
has anyone suggested letting non-Whites into organizations, rather than just working w/ them where it’s practical?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, MARK

@Esau
3 days ago
Maybe we can convince the non-White nations to neutralize ZOG for us?…

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AWIVR
0/

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
they only want to help for selfish reasons. usually they hate their own. many are not trustworthy

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
What about the NSDAP’s SS non-White divisions? Ask him about that

AWIVR
3 days ago
WPWW

@Chris
3 days ago
You won’t get non-whites to help you vote your way out of this, nor will they help you to get rid of them.

BobMatthews
3 days ago
yeah the post ww2 Spielberg narrative is so strong and prevalent its so diffucult for mid wits to shrug it off…

The Pork Report
3 days ago
WHITE POWER

Callaghan
3 days ago
WHITE POWER

rex
3 days ago
hoteps

The Pork Report
3 days ago
We don’t need non-Whites. Let them take care of themselves. Whites are too altruistic, and it’s a one-way street.

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
sry guy, the only peaceful talk we will have is how you will play along when i deport you from my country, this can go down in two ways, i prefer the peaceful route.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
You also have to react to the fact that civilisation and nationhood per se are under attack across the board.

@Mitch
3 days ago
I can see both sides

@RonP1
3 days ago
Colin Jordan?

Blankeon
3 days ago
The NS Germans could respect non-Whites who were fighting against the Jew World Order in their own territories. But the non-Whites were not allowed to be citizens in Europe. That is the difference from today.

@Fatty
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
This is such a poor question

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
says you as a non-white?

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
the fourth reich can only be roman catholic as it refers to the fourth holy roman catholic empire

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
problem is duke thinks we should just demand our rights rather than taking them

Kevin
3 days ago
Being Civil isn’t hard , We have different populations of Arabs in USA vs UK . The rich Arabs go to America , the grooming stuff doesn’t happen here like in other places

@Chris
3 days ago
I don’t get this “let’s talk to non-whites about our political issues.” what does it do’? like seriously… yeah ok, they might agree or disagree, now what?

collatz
3 days ago
it’s just shit stirring

@Esau

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
the most successful nations today are patriarchal ethnostates. you can’t ignore that

@Mitch
3 days ago
Mark seems a bit softer in approach than Joel.

@Esau
3 days ago

@siegkreuz
NS is exclusively Roman Catholic?! WTF are you smoking, dude?

@RonP1
3 days ago
They’re deliberately putting darkies in schools in remote areas in the hope they might mix with white girls

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel is right!We need to unite white and stay white

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Spot on, Mark

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
therein lies the problem

Siegkreuz
3 days ago
national socialism is exclusively roman catholic, the third reich refers to the third holy roman catholic empire. the fourth reich can only be roman catholic

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
WP o/

Son of Mars
3 days ago
white power o/

Kevin
3 days ago
Woody o/

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
Joel is right. balkanize like the other groups or we are toast!

@Esau
3 days ago
“White power is the name of the game” – Joel Davis, 2025. LFG!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Hope Mark is taking note. Protests and leaflets are not enough. WOODLANDER’s position is my my position, now.

@ArabSocialNationalist

meaty
3 days ago
i’m posting my bird back to Thailand.

AWIVR
3 days ago
white people should be picking up sticks and watching paint dry

Kevin
3 days ago
Somalis do not belong in England or New England

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
you say it’s incentive based, and yet removing the incentive can’t overlap to “alliance” on issues like opposing israel? do you see how you limit your potential result there?

@popovacianen
3 days ago
BAGPIPES FOR THE WHITE MAN ;(

Kevin
3 days ago
regionalism works

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Culture isn’t supposed to be inclusive

@Esau
3 days ago
We need INTENTIONAL White communities like what Eric Aarvol is doing in the USA

Reclaim
3 days ago
no asian gfs

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
cringe

Kevin
3 days ago
Happy Saint Patrick’s day guys

@RonP1
3 days ago
That’s the end of his families ancestry

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
you stop paying them too, retardo

@popovacianen
3 days ago
lmao

@glider
3 days ago
depressing visual

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Chris
I’ve met some amazing people during my travels. they had no intentions of coming to the west. they were proud of their nations.

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
then stop paying them

Kevin
3 days ago
We probably could deal with other non White countries better than Shomrim squad policing the world killing innocents

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@haraldr1984
nope. they have been paid to invade our countries.

collatz
3 days ago

@LottaSense
and not every practical alliance is entirely peaceful surrounding the goal

@Esau
3 days ago
I have a bag-pipe of sorts…

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
there’s a difference?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
highland games

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@LottaSense
they will. They fled their countries instead of fighting.

Brosey
3 days ago
too tolerant, too kind, always capitulating

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we can have GREAT relations with non white people IF they remain IN their own countries

@Clyde
3 days ago
not while they occupy our lands – I’ll support them in their lands

@Chris
3 days ago
I am not opposed either to working with non-whites, i will work with them, when they want to leave my country!

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Even after victory, Whites will still have to live in the world, and deal with other nations.

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need it so nonwhites can’t have children whenever they want

Kevin
3 days ago
drew pavlou the Turk

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
We aren’t including nons in our movement, he’s saying that if they understand what we are doing then they are less likely to come into conflict with us.

@Esau
3 days ago
lol the Negroes can fight on the frontlines against ZOG

Brosey
3 days ago
*concern

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed, Mark

@Mitch
3 days ago
Joel spoke with a non white guy half Lebanese

Brosey
3 days ago

@LottaSense
certainly my only concen

@VrilPilled
3 days ago
This micro nationalism wont stand a chance against america and china

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
100%

@LottaSense
3 days ago
OUR homogeneous society is the only thing that matters

Kevin
3 days ago
Kanye made himself look ridiculous

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
all white..no non whites

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
white pro movement will only work i

Blankeon
3 days ago
Only good thing about Kanye talking about NS is making the normie masses more interested in the subject and normalizing it.

JokerWaffen
3 days ago
o/

Kevin
3 days ago
Dr Duke is great too

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Is is good NS boy. I’ve met and drunk with him

collatz
3 days ago
[revving noises]

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Still does

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LottaSense
yeah

Shamrockshake
3 days ago

@Brutusch
he benefited handsomely off the hollywood system.

@LottaSense
3 days ago
oh here comes the race cucking

Kevin
3 days ago
Heil

Callaghan
3 days ago

@Teamfield
0/

Kevin
3 days ago
o/

@AWIVR

AWIVR
3 days ago
\o

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
Safe White & Clean

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Police you didn’t hear that

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Kanyes idiocy does nothing to promote nationalism

@LottaSense
3 days ago
PHYSICAL FIGHTERS

Kevin
3 days ago
o/ hey brother

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Poland safe too!98% safe..Japan 98% White..

AWIVR
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Political Soldiers

@Daniel
3 days ago
Love this guy

AZRIZZLER
3 days ago
#starfieldteam

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
they aren’t hurting enough

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
don’t they have polar bears?

Kevin
3 days ago
Only thing I disagreed with Joel was kanye , agree to disagree

@01123581379
3 days ago
Eugenics is the answer

Callaghan
3 days ago
Iceland is the safest country=No diversity

BobMatthews
3 days ago
you see it so much here in the US as well with these suburban normies with these McMansion generic shitty houses..Just relegating to vapid consumerism and materialism..No racial conscience

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews who run public schools have already trained a couple generations to “use their words” instead of fighting physically

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
14

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
GET TRIBAL White man!Or D.I.E.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago
^^

Kevin
3 days ago
Tom Blair and Joel are the best of Starfield Nationalism

@popovacianen
3 days ago
i think joel is 1488 lol

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need to sterilize all non whites

Blankeon
3 days ago
Democracy is a fundamentally dishonorable system that rewards dishonorable, lying scum politicians

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Its a question of LEARNING TO BECOME TRIBAL!!!

@Chris
3 days ago
I 100% agree with Joel, we need a movement, that makes the people drunk, drunk from the will to live, drunk from the will to assert dominance…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for JOEL

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel hits the nail on the head

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Whites are too scared and too altruistic and nice to other races that wanna kill us!

@Esau
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Yup, Hate Speech laws in Canada were created by the (((Cohen Commission))).

Kevin
3 days ago
#FreeSam

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
true it is all about White people

Kevin
3 days ago
#FreeCharlie

Kevin
3 days ago
Language laws are Jewish

@RonP1
3 days ago
They own the system, we’re in an awful position, most are more interested in watching the gogglebox

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Whites are the problem

@popovacianen
3 days ago
oh shit joel is pissed lol

AZRIZZLER
3 days ago
starfieldian lives matter

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
White race a bunch of pussies. Amen

Kevin
3 days ago
No more brother wars

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Drunkards and pot heads are also a problem

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I continue to be very impressed with Joel

Son of Mars
3 days ago
This will essentially turn into irregular warfare of sorts, the establishment will try to kill those who upset their order. It’s good to know that going in and be ready to face possible death for survival and glory.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
JOEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin
3 days ago
the enemy are scared

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
AMEN!White race are pussies. Tough facts

@LottaSense
3 days ago
conditioned and brainpoisoned to be pussies

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
old population

Kent
3 days ago
remember #BANTHEADL? neither does anyone else

Kevin
3 days ago
would be proto-Starfield

@popovacianen
3 days ago
NO WEAK CUNTS ALLOWED ;(

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@fishandsoil
that’s debatable

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
agree with Joel on this too

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
yes as White ONLY care about Whites…and we need to demand WHITE UNITY

@fishandsoil
3 days ago
#Starfieldianlivesmatter

@01123581379
3 days ago
Don’t be LOW T

Kevin
3 days ago
flag has stars so we called it Starfield

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Joel is totally right on this

Shamrockshake
3 days ago
but they take our first names and won’t stop coming into our lands. crazy

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
RISE

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@LottaSense
This

Kevin
3 days ago
inside joke

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@AWIVR
the starfieldians are better when they slur

BobMatthews
3 days ago
complacency and escapism

Kevin
3 days ago
Australia = Starfield btw

Kent
3 days ago
done scare the slags

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need a standing army

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Teamfield
.I dont think that guy has barely anymore than 3 viewers on odysee anymore. Not even certain if he is pro-White anymore…

@Chris
3 days ago
Women get hot and bothered by strength!!! if you project strength, the gardening tools will follow suit!

Kevin
3 days ago
ghetto greg

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
lol, I like that mark was so taken back by that. I respect that bants

@Esau
3 days ago
Where dem White hoes at, shieet. Muh dick

@LottaSense
3 days ago
marks correct on that

collatz
3 days ago
skims the slags

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
the wimin mark

@Esau
3 days ago
None of us really have all the answers on how to reclaim White nations this side of WW2, so why not try everything and just don’t counter-signal other White nationalists?

Blankeon
3 days ago
Im with Justin Barret & Joel Davis on this issue. Our problems can only be solved with radical politics such as National Socialism. Democracy creates weak people who cannot solve difficult problems like mass immigration.

@RonP1
3 days ago
They have the tools to stop Nationalists getting anywhere near their system, therein lies the problem

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Joel calling out REACTIONARIES. Top man

AWIVR
3 days ago
at least he’s not slurring

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
I’ve never heard an Australian make a good argument

@popovacianen
3 days ago
NO HOES ALLOWED ;(

Matt Hammond
3 days ago
Another Partridge moment

Kevin
3 days ago
gangster Gregory innit m8

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
WN basically communicates in Ebonics

Kevin
3 days ago
Martinez got that from Bjerknes … the “ Hitler was jewish “ guy

BobMatthews
3 days ago

@Maldric
I’d agree..Noble to fight but when its just at the expense of inevitable demise it doesnt bode well…

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Teamfield
it’s very hard for me, Whites around here are disagreeable ‘class conscious

AWIVR
3 days ago

@Kent
get

@countercurrents
on the show

@Esau
3 days ago
Oh no, is Keith parroting Brandon Martinez’s takes that Hitler was anti-White?! hahaha WTF

@WhiteBracer
3 days ago
oh hey Mark

Kevin
3 days ago
PA has great optics and people attacked Mark over “Book gate” ? This reminds me of the bulldogs who attack Mark

@RonP1
3 days ago
Read Colin Jordan’s 1962 Trafalgar Square speech, tells us everything we need to know about the situation we are in

@UltimateTruth
3 days ago

@Esau
Possibly. Obviously I don’t know for sure. I find it suspicious they were allowed to register with the Zionist controlled electoral commission and they forbid discussion of the JQ (party policy)

Kevin
3 days ago
community building offline is the way

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
haha, Mark learned something today.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao mark

Kevin
3 days ago
Garden hoes ?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
I still say THIRD POSITION is a better label.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
the women

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Advocacy for people of European heritage includes by any means necessary

Kevin
3 days ago
o/

@WhiteBracer

collatz
3 days ago
lol dammit bracer

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Starfield team o/

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago
*pricks, who love to attack others… and many cucked libtards & cucked husbands

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
^^^

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
so keep up the ball paddling

@Kent

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
Ukraine is a lost cause, anyone saying otherwise is very badly mistaken

Kevin
3 days ago
Colin Liddell is also a giant Azov shill , odd isn’t it

@Kent

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Esau
buy XRP, lol

Kent
3 days ago

@Teamfield
nothing much. just here to remind

@countercurrents
that Ukraine is a jewish controlled patsy of Jewish controlled America AND THEY LOST

Kevin
3 days ago

@Question_Everything_mCtH_
100%

The Pork Report
3 days ago
^

@RonP1
3 days ago
Le Penn is part of the club

@Esau
3 days ago
Whites are heavily conscientious and oriented towards Moral Communities, therefore we need to make a MORAL case for White nationalism IMO…but we also need MONEY behind us.

collatz
3 days ago
he’ll yeah borther

Kevin
3 days ago
aye up mate

@Kent

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago
good to see all the boys

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@Teamfield
Whisper campaign, influencing friends, & family, & also having 0 tolerance for people who are antiwhite would absolutely would positively reverberate

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Kent
o/

Kevin
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
o/ muppet gang gang

Kent
3 days ago
and if you would understand

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
I’m surprised to hear this about Homeland, too. What’s going on there?

Kevin
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@AWIVR
o/

@Esau
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Wait, what? You think Homeland is funded by Shlomo?!

collatz
3 days ago

@AWIVR
you should strike up a conversation w/ Greg. I feel like you could get him talking

collatz
3 days ago

@Maldric
o/

AWIVR
3 days ago
we’re all counting on you

@lotharcollatz

@RonP1
3 days ago

@UltimateTruth
Bingo

Dead Internet Society
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
keep up the good fight king

@LottaSense
3 days ago
Joel is 100% correct

Kevin
3 days ago
the man on the street will do something eventually , people don’t like the Jewish invaders , peasant antisemitism or shabbos NRx clout chaser

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Is a Republican boomer. He can’t be anything else. It’s what he is.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Neutering yourself for muskscraps

Question EVERYTHING!
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
& NPCs are default antiwhite, severity depends on their political affiliation

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
You can still use Odysee at the moment mate!

@RonP1
3 days ago
The problem controls the Media and edjewcation system, therein lies the problem

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@popovacianen
I don’t know, I don’t think so, I can accept superchats on Odysee or Entropy!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Debate him -and lose, like you did with Mark

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@countercurrents
he said that they will follow who ever in power dont twist his words

collatz
3 days ago

@countercurrents
sounds like his argument is basically an order-of-operations one

@Glen19
3 days ago

@countercurrents
Yes. Kind of contradictory

@Chris
3 days ago
ethnocentrism is a part of conformity… the will to survive and to live and the chances are greater, if you align with people who look like you and thats a simple truth of nature.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Most folk are NPCs

Kevin
3 days ago
Odysee got nuked by NNR & other ppl fighting flagging each other

Counter-Currents
3 days ago
Why is Joel appealing to “the average guy in the street” when he earlier said that the masses are not persuadable?

@popovacianen
3 days ago
oh thanks

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Teamfield
o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
No you have to use entropy
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

0KT0BER
3 days ago
odysee arein the midst of changing payment processor

Kevin
3 days ago
Rogan guests like Theo Von & Jake Shields are good for normies

@Chris
3 days ago

@Esau
yeah, just take a look at their girlfriends, wives and children, 80-90% are white and white.

@popovacianen
3 days ago
wait is mark demonitazed on odysee?

collatz
3 days ago

@countercurrents
“many liberals” vs. “conservatives [implicitly all]” careful language, but while this is a popular idea, I’ve yet to see anyone try to establish it in the same sense LAC does Rogan’s guest’s composition

@Glen19
3 days ago
We can’t donate on Odyssey anymore?

@MarkCollett

Kevin
3 days ago
o/ Mark o/ Joel

BobMatthews
3 days ago
without any intention for offense, Mark could greatly benefit from a value oriented microphone like a Rode NT mini usb…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
that is just ridicolous

@Jeffrey-D
3 days ago
because communism won the war and participated to the creation of the new world order , the far left is accepted

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Guys, we only have three questions tonight over on Entropy! If anyone wants to ask a question, please do so, as I will be asking them soon!

Kevin
3 days ago
Bulldog nationalists in Ireland ? idk ?

@Esau
3 days ago
Most Whites – even leftist Whites – are demonstrably IMPLICITLY ethnocentric i.e., they “vote with their feet” e.g., living in gated White communities….we need to get Whites to be EXPLICITLY ethnocentrism.

@Chris
3 days ago
Hitlers goal was to unify the left and right, because in reality, there is no difference between a communist german and a conservative german, a protestant or catholic german.

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Boris Johnson was called a Nazi

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
MUh Naertsee

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@popovacianen
right but it is reasonable to think tha they are like eighties western Nationalists

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith using the most AstroTurfed “banned man in America” Fuentes is a joke when he flew to UK to meet an Irishman ?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
desensitization.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@popovacianen
Joel says you need to be racist to be successful but I don’t see how yelling racial slurs at people will bring you to victory

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
National Socialists recruited germans from the left and the right… there wasn’t a specific targeted group, thats the first time i hear that one.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Spot on Mark. The movement destroyed the power of the term nazi. Now isn’t the time to fret over it. It’s a strange thing.

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Keith just wants to be an E-celeb

@Glen19
3 days ago

@popovacianen
Yelling racial slurs and waving the Japanese imperial flag and sometimes the Nazi flag doesn’t really appeal to anyone. maybe I’m mistaken and it will eventually work but I think not

@vengeance
3 days ago
what the fug

Kent
3 days ago
we just need to get trump to tweet gamergate

@Chris
3 days ago
I am ethnic german and i can say that with certainty and confidence, because ive read all the books, from Hitlers Mein Kampf, his second book, which is sus, to Alfred Rosenberg to all the spergs from the conservative revolutionary movement in the times of the weimar republic.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Chris
Rosenberg’s “Myth of the 20th Century” is one of the deepest books I’ve ever read in my life. I will definitely need to re-read it many more time.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Good question Mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
You have to begin the schooling and I think many of the German and Italian thinkers are necessary for this

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@Glen19
clown show as compared to who? western nationalists? lmao

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Son.of.Mars
always ask them:”Do you think Whites deserve a homeland”?when they say NO show them how that is antiwhite and wrong because all other races have their honelands already!

Brosey
3 days ago
optically

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The National Socialists actively recruited from communists, at Hitler’s insistence. Goebbels was a communist before he was a National Socialist.

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yeah i get it but why shit on japanese nationalists

@vengeance
3 days ago
yes i ca imagine that

@haraldr1984
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Are you living in a european nation and are planning to procreate with a white woman?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
I think Keith is blaming NS for the poor performance of the National Party in Irish politics. He is blaming the “spergs” who moved the Overton Window to the right in the first place. It’s a real shame.

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Esau
It’s a hard read

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Albanese is a worm

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
Conservatives in all western nations exist to prevent actual nationalism from happening

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The Right is weak. A fkn failure by any objective measure.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
so was joel though right…

Brosey
3 days ago
what mark just described is exactly why NS will be rehabilitated

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I am sorry, there is hardly any “German Particularism” in National Socialsim…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The Left are REVOLUTIONARIES; the Right are REACTIONARIES

@Chris
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hitlers supposed understanding of aryan hsitory is mainly a thing coming from Rosenberg, who studied aryan history and the influence and development of philosophy on the aryan soul throughout history.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Born in Egypt, bless his heart

Son of Mars
3 days ago
*if

@01123581379
3 days ago
End the Fed is the superior movement because that is what will help whites the most

@Glen19
3 days ago
Japanese nationalists are a clown show. They do things in a performative racist way and haven’t made much ground. Can’t even protest against Kurds in the country

Son of Mars
3 days ago
NS is easy to like and convert to of you don’t want your people to die off/subjugated

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Even Peter Hitchens knows Britain’s involvement in the war was a disaster.

Reclaim
3 days ago
the red bull putsch

@Chris
3 days ago
National Socialism is a amalgamation of all the european thinkers and philosophers who based their ideas in reality.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
true

Kevin
3 days ago
maybe Keith wants to be Irish Fuentes ?

@Chris
3 days ago

@LottaSense
nonsense, National Socialism wasn’t a specific german thing, if you take a look at all the influences all the german thinkers had… Henry Ford played a formative influence on National Socialism, the friggin race laws were based on the Jim Crow Laws.

@Esau
3 days ago
Globalism stems from the Tanakh

@Esau
3 days ago
(((Globalism)))

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
I have heard about it but I haven’t read it

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
just spread prowhiteism you do it your way..as long as its spreading prowhiteism I dont care what you do..Ive made 100s of whites become prowhite just by talking in my community…it starts in your home..and your closest friends..when we are all prowhites its game over for the antiwhites

@LottaSense
3 days ago
seethe dummy

@Esau
3 days ago
If we don’t get some big wins under our collective belt, I predict ZOG will start locking us White waycists in mental asylums. Psychiatry is very jewish, stemming mostly from the American Psychiatric Association.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
The comment sections in those AI-translated Hitler speeches are very positive.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Rudolf Hess was NS personified.

Reclaim
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Chris
The question of German particularism is an important one because it stems from Hitler’s own view of Aryan history and the place of Germany in it. It’s something that’s easily resolved in a good faith discussion.

@tuer
3 days ago
20 x hasbara budget

@01123581379
3 days ago
The label isn’t what matters what matters is ending the private central JEW bank forever

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
just spread prowhiteism Chris…and find the best technique for recruiting whites to become prowhite..then when one of us are in power we use that power to steer the ship in a prowhite way…this is how it works

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReclaimYourNeighborhood
lol

@Glen19
3 days ago
Nothing wrong with universalism to a degree. Funny how those who say nationalism for everyone don’t include Palestinians for some reason

Kevin
3 days ago
Keith is doing Civic antisemitism / Kosher anti Zionism which eventually will lead to CivNat / Civic Fascism. Why he chooses to go backwards ? who knows

@LottaSense
3 days ago
too bad it was not a pan-European movement. It was a pan-Germanism movement. Nothing wrong with that, but it was murdered in its crib before it became pan-European.

@Esau
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
The book is called “Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition”. Chapter 8.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The spiritual question is a central one. The current zeitgeist requires a measure of spiritual thinking, and dare I say – mysticism. Materialism and objectivism do nothing for the soul.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
We had our own version here, the likes of Henry Hamilton Beamish and Arnold Leese would have come down on the small hats 10x harder if they ever got in power.

@Chris
3 days ago
with the former Group you build the worldview, the ideas ect. the foundation of your group and the letter is the meat of the group. the whole Head and body concept of the folk.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I disagree with MacDonald that Whites are individualistic. Ukrainians in Japan & Taiwan have their own ethnic advocacy group. French in Singapore seem pretty collectivist in their neighborhood.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Esau
sounds interesting

@Glen19
3 days ago
Can’t ignore the Nazi accuastion and the holocaust if you are a nationalist in the West. Doesn’t mean you need the copy the political platform of the NSDAP exactly. You can have a new political ideology that works for whatever situation you are in.

@Chris
3 days ago
Then you need to project strength and you do that by having a vanguard, a sort of drone squad of people who aren’t as steadfast in their worldview but are willing to do the fighting for the group.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
There was far more history to NS than just the putsch, Joel

@Esau
3 days ago
IMO Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s latest book on Western psychology is a GREAT resource to strategizing how to win over Whites.

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
the issue is still the same though, you try to go the hard way, by red pilling every normie on a individual basis… you will spend eternity until you get enough people to be on your side, which is not feasible. You need a handful intellectuals who are steadfast in their WV.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Turning against National Socialism is rather like denying that you’re racist – you’re losing the argument and accepting the premises of the enemy.

rex
3 days ago
” white new deal ” ” four natural freedoms ”

@01123581379
3 days ago
The swatztika is ETERNAL

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Lol yes. I can grow a thicker beard than most Chinamen.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Yagoda
Dear Christian Brother we have that discussion another place

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Spot on Joel

@RonP1
3 days ago
Drop ‘the nazis’ Jew propaganda term

@Esau
3 days ago

@Glen19
My point still stands. As long as you aren’t in White countries.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I live in Japan.

@Esau
3 days ago

@Glen19

@ArabSocialNationalist
I respect Chinese and Arabs…if they stay the hell in China and the ME…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Glen19
That must mean you can grow a beard!

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I haven’t disagreed with Joel about anything yet. Can anyone prove him wrong?

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
yes! yes! yes!

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I’m actually part Hui. This DNA test I got from China has me having some Iranian & Central Asian dna. It doesn’t matter to me because I don’t think ethnicity is soley based on genetics. Although it is a factor you can’t ignore.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
The puritan, I’m-smarter-than-you element in the Movement has always been a problem. Tea and biscuits and long words won’t cut it.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Colin Jordan – A prime example of a NS

@LottaSense
3 days ago
they don’t hate jewsus

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
some of us Canadians of Irish and Scottish heritage have not entirely forgotten where we came from

@01123581379
3 days ago
Rockefellers wanted the mass immigration to punk us into world government. Kakala winning would have made it possible for sure. We dodged a bullet.

Brosey
3 days ago
re what joel is saying, the patrick bateman memes were funny for a time but i personally am tired of them

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
rooting for the underdog is rooting for nons pre 1945

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago
Alcohol has also been a poison to the movement and there are also too many dude weed bros as well

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews use biological weapons aka blacks and browns to kill White countries

@Chris
3 days ago
this is also the issue normies have, they repeat what their group says, without really believing it, which is where cognitive dissonance kicks in.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
prowhite means you put whites first..you fight antiwhites and fight for pro white policies..you upkeep prowhiteism in everything you do…when we all boycot coca cola it will work etc

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
but who let them in ?

@Esau
3 days ago
lol the “Synagogue of Satan” verses in Revelations is not saying what based Christians think it says. Adam Green laid that interpretation to rest.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Hispanics killed America

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
long live the underdog

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed, Joel

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
wouldn’t you agree that there is a difference between what a person says and what a person beliefs? again, conformity being the issue, i wouldn’t put my trust in a person who just repeats, belief is a process of self realization.

@01123581379
3 days ago
I would say browns

@LottaSense
3 days ago
jews are nig nogs

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
the jews

@LottaSense
3 days ago
both

rex
3 days ago
tradies

@01123581379
3 days ago
who hurts prowhiteness the most blacks or browns?

@RonP1
3 days ago
“According to one former Brownshirt, 132 Nazis had been killed and 18 thousand injured by the end of 1932
and a further 68 killed in January 1933, at the end of which Hitler was appointed Chancellor!.”

@LottaSense
3 days ago

@lotharcollatz
exactly

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
And a broad land which lends itself to the pioneer mindset

collatz
3 days ago
There’s a difference b/t a ragtag group of well-motivated supporters….and boneface

@LottaSense
3 days ago
(some of chat, not the host or guest)

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we dont need a spaceship..we just need to keep prowhiting..then the more prowhites we become evetually it will be too.many prowhites to ignore and the people will only allow prowhite leaders…thats how a prowhite will come to power..people selected him for being pro white/pro Germany only

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
what do you mean by making someone pro-white? make other people repeat what you are saying?

@LottaSense
3 days ago
gayyyyyy

@01123581379
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
stating facts isn’t infighting

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@01123581379
Please no religious infighting

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NSDAP started with the DAP. Gregor Strasser was there first. Hitlerites don’t like that fact

@RonP1
3 days ago
Jews are behind these thug looking characters, that people are led to believe are National Socialists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The SA, the working class are crucial to any nationalist movement. You can’t be middle class about things. Hitler defended those lads for exactly that reason. Snobbery is poison to nationalism.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
Im prowhite…you are prowhite..a prowhite person made you prowhite correct?so keep prowhiting..Ive made so many whites prowhite and keep doing so…we grow organically worldwide…eventually we are too many to be stopped

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Esau
Half brown -like the NSDAP’s SS 13th division

@01123581379
3 days ago
NatSocs falsely believe that Hitler was spontaneous when in reality he was allowed to leave Rothschild central bank to create the WWII narrative.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
I would be a citizen of the Reich, per the Nuremberg laws.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Mark is sending for Blood Tribe

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Yep, we’re in a terrible situation

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
degenerates

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
so you will shame them, while the bigger group, the one they belong to, are shaming you for being a racist ect…

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Joel, you’re a Christian mate…the Bible tells us God’s kingdom is gonna fix everything…we pray for it in the Lords prayer mate …we pray for God’s kingdom to come not for man’s mate

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
I got made on the train reading a book about Strasser. Someone googled it, then started asking me why I was interested in nohtzees

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
So you are half brown?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We band of brothers, we happy few

@Glen19
3 days ago
I am Chinese.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Esau
I assume he is Arab based on his name lol

@AlternativePatriot
3 days ago
We do need to drop the red braces, boots and general neo nazi aesthetics imo and cultivate clean aesthetics with physically fit and clean cut people in out movement

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
you entertaining empty calories, it does nothing, it did nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Esau
I’m half English half Arab. Not that Arabs are a race as such.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
We will make it popular to be prowhite

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anyone uncomfortable with Joel’s position should think themselves lucky that Strasserite

@ArabSocialNationalist
is not speaking :grinning:

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago

@Chris
we will keep exposing antiwhiteism until all Whites eho don’t join the fight will be called self hating whites…we make it shame to not be pro white

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Perhaps you didn’t see my question the first time. What race are you?

@Chris
3 days ago
like i pointed out, Conformity is our biggest issue that we have to deal with… hitler wrote about it himself, he red pilled his normie friends just for them to come back with the old programming and arguments.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Where would Jonathan Bowden be on this issue, I wonder?

@Chris
3 days ago
the mass doesn’t care about facts.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Romantic is a key word. You need romanticism and the subjective. The crisis of modernity is rooted in materialism, and materialism has to be fought head on.

@Chris
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
then what? we tried that for how long? it doesn’t work like that.

@RonP1
3 days ago
They wouldn’t allow a genuine party anywhere near Their system

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Joel’s position; 13 for Woods’

@Esau
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
What race are you?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Pandering to the lowest common denominator desires of voters is contrary to the fundamental NS views
of leadership – which are based on natural law and the proof of history.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I also agree with Joel

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Joel incredible based as always

@Chris
3 days ago
I 100% agree with Joel, thats the only way how its done.

@01123581379
3 days ago
It took a lot of brain power to invent rubber dildos that’s Chosen Power

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Along with you, I’m now banned from Twitter. Said nothing bad. Just started calling out Farage

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
The Holocaust is used to discredit nationalism. If you are going to be fighting for repatriation & laws protecting a demographic majority. You will start running up against the Holocaust blood libel.

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
real af

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
We are going to be called Nazis and racists anyway

@01123581379
3 days ago
We need a central bank that is run by congress with term limits

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
14

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we get that by exposing and pointing out antwhiteism and with the persecution against our people in focus

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Does the community approach NSN in the street? Or are they afraid?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Of course. They’re moving agianst ethnonationalism across the board. Panic.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
For sure. The question is how much they are lying by…….

@BritishGammon
3 days ago

@oneyedfatman
They were INVITED to rebuild Britain, apparently – lol

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Yeah, they obviously give out BS figures so people think things aren’t as bad as they are

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Jeew tycoons expect the Dildo market to reach 62 billion$ per anum by 2030.

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
London is definitely less than 30% White British

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The crisis of modernity has its basis in the foundational lie of WWII. You can’t liberate people’s minds until you smash the WWII myth entirely.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
agreed

@Mitch
3 days ago
2035 not 2066

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago
britain started when david lammys parents came to Britain, apparently

@RonP1
3 days ago
There’s next to no Brits left in areas like Tottenham

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Nationalists need to think about what can be salvaged from the ashes. There’s no saving the situation with votes.

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Insane how it got this far.

@Esau
3 days ago

@haraldr1984
Yup. Too many Whites think the jews are primarily anti-Christian…NO, they are anti-White. In fact, jews hate White heathenry more than White Christians, but I digress…

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Use a Schmidt photo instead

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
It’ll be sooner than that. The rate of settlement of migrants is positively frantic.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@ssanwaerter
have a good day at work o/

Callaghan
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
yeah 0/

@ssanwaerter
3 days ago
Ahh i gotta go to work soon but i’ll watch the replay later. Great stream so far lads.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Use the Celtic Cross. Nat symbol since day 1

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Yagoda
yeah they like to show them off taking pictures, so they buy fancy ones to flex

@Esau
3 days ago
Greetings, folks! o/

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
National Socialism is a set of natural laws which are given a name. It’s not an invention of Hitler per se, it is the codification of a set of natural laws and a programme for their renewed implementation.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Again I ask, why the opposite opinion to the Trad Workers you were heavily involved in? You had some epiphany?

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@Yagoda
thats because anything can be a dildo if you’re brave enough

@Glen19
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Ireland has a rich nationalist history and it is very recent. Not to mention it wasn’t liberal

@popovacianen
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
cuck box broke nobody cares what you have to say lol

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Trump lacks the Balls to ban Dildos, much less to ban Pornography.

@Chris
3 days ago
think about Martin Luther, when the church threatened to ban him and he said “Ich stehe hier. Ich kann nicht anders.” or think about socrates who said that he can’t do anything else but tell the truth, even when faced and threatened with death.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Each time you get up, you need to reflect on how you got knocked down last time and change up your fight.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@CosmicPepe
I use the word assimilation differently. Like how the Ainu were assimilated. They were made to intermarry Japanese, language was banned, etc. Essentially an ethnocide.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Why would an Irish Nationalist adopt a German history hobby project? It makes no sense. His tradition predates German NS by centuries, and has been far more successful, by any measure.

@Chris
3 days ago
There are 2 types of people, people who are unstable and people who stick to the simple truth no matter what. I see this here in germany literally every friggin day, politician who were thought to be principled break and bend… and it is simply because of the other type of person is a rarity.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
It’s not just about the baggage of decades of brainwashing and slander. Even NSDAP in its best possible light was not for export, and was ethnically and historically contingent.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
So you now call out Warren and Striker?

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
There were a lot of Strasserists knocking about the BNP, to be fair.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Apparently most Perverts prefer to purchase dildos imported from Asia.

@oneyedfatman
3 days ago

@RonP1
deport nons first

@RonP1
3 days ago
It’s really not that difficult, one of the first things you would do is crack down on Secret Societies

@Chris
3 days ago
Hitler said it in his speech “We shall not lie, we shall not con.”

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Uncle DID NOT invent NS

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
TradWorker was for Faith, Family, and Folk. It was smeared as a neonazi hitler hobby project.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
yeah, try it again. The more you do tests and poke around the sooner you’ll get it dialed in

Son of Mars
3 days ago
Leonidas died in thermopylae, did that mean the greeks should’ve given up? Fall down six times, stand up seven.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Keith and co cannot accept the terrible truth – there is no parliamentary or democratic answer to the crisis of modernity and the Jewish Problem. NS is needed because it is fundamentally revolutionary, and that is why it is needed. You cannot use the system to defeat itself. The system must go.

@Chris
3 days ago
Well, Keith got corrupted by popularity and the ability to make money with the movement and the moment you try to make money with the movement, the entire revolutionary spirit is gone.

The Pork Report
3 days ago
You have to assimilate if you come to a new country. If you can’t assimilate, don’t come.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Hey, Grok. Did the NSDAP defeat jewish globalism?

@Glen19
3 days ago
Every State that is multiethnic will have minority rights for political stability. It has nothing to do with liberalism. Its that or forced assimiliiation.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
I suspect Keith is bitter because of the poor showing of the National Party in the Irish elections. Perhaps he’s blaming NS for turning off the masses. He’d be wrong, but perhaps that’s what’s underlying his bitterness.

@RonP1
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
LOL

The Pork Report
3 days ago

@Son.of.Mars
Exactly, I think that liberalism is a big wrong turn the West took a while ago, and now we need to right it.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RonP1
yes, who would die for King Charles ?

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
I don’t want my country to turn into pajeetistan 2.0

Long Knife
3 days ago
Answer: only with a better idea

@Chris
3 days ago
People like Keith try to appease the masses, while the masses look for a strong leader… basically, Keith is soy, while the masses want bloody meat!

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
Appreciate being in chat with fellow nationists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
A lot of nationalists would do well to look at Rosenberg. NS is not just a chauvinistic reward for being Aryan – it’s a programme of restoration of something that was lost a long time ago. It’s boldness and depth are often ignored.

Long Knife
3 days ago
a better question: Can National Socialism be killed ?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
we took a wrong turn, and ended up somewhere we don’t want to be, we have to look back where we went wrong.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
“For King And Country” – Imagine coming out with that now.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
So called infighting is merely sparring and good training.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
You’re right to call out reactionaries. Anyone who is not revolutionary at this point is living in the 1800s

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

@Sweet_Nerevar
3 days ago
yeah Cali 480p, don’t ask me how

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@Chris
all true mate

Callaghan
3 days ago

@AdarHitrock
i might change the bitrate and try after…

@Chris
3 days ago
There is a simple answer to this… reality hasn’t changed since then… the enemy is the same, the issues are the same, ect.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
In a Europe where Christianity has collapsed, NS is needed also because it has a spiritual dimension, which people desperately need.

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Callahan may I call in??

@RonP1
3 days ago
Democracy is the jew tool no matter what name the party goes under – end of story

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MatthewParrott
Is not this, your position, antithetical to the Trad Workers?

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago

@daniel
No, they spoke with Justice Actions usually.

@AdarHitrock
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
you gonna do a test stream today?

Son of Mars
3 days ago
NS is extremely attractive if communicated properly

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Warren, Greg Conte etc., have been steadfast on this.

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
Joel just explained that the S in NS is some intellectualized bullshit that’s not Socialist or even “Social” in the common sense. And now he’s dumping schmittian and hegelian dialectical word salad. His brain’s totally fried on germanophile bullshit.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
NS is still relevant: Third Posirionism. The TRad Workers, Striker, Warren, get that much

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
To attack – at this moment – a nationalist movement that puts socialism front and centre is very suspicious indeed. Can reactionary nationalists really be called nationalists at all?

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
pat was being facetious

@haraldr1984
3 days ago
Let Joel cook man

@Daniel
3 days ago
Truth You know any decent reading material on the Klan?

Callaghan
3 days ago

@vettekid407
Pat Bateman told me Lil Sheckel ia alive and well…

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
I mean once..we only need divide our social space once!Prowhite vs Antiwhite. This is how we finally can unite instead of dumb infighting

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
gtsy

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
\o

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
Unlike Irish and Italian mafias who fraternized with Jeews, the KKlan did noble things for White people.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
About time this issue was addressed. Look where cowering, playing by the System’s rules has got us

Vettekid1488
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
I was just listening to some old Gas Station streams… brought back fond memories

Callaghan
3 days ago

@TribalismOnlyForThem
0/

@Glen19
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Which makes it different. The Indigenous Taiwanese have special privileges like they can own firearms for hunting for example but they don’t have more rights than the Han majority.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
National Socialism should also be understood as a programme of improvement and restoration which would logically render itself unnecessary, which is what Hitler foresaw for the NSDAP.

@01123581379
3 days ago
Starmer told Trump that UK has free speech

Callaghan
3 days ago

@vettekid407
Iheard hes still alive…

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Only divide our social space twice: Prowhites vs. Antiwhites. You prowhite you are on TEAM WHITE

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
R.I.P Lil Shekel

@Glen19
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
The minorities there have separate autonomous republics. China has a similiar thing. Enhe is a autonomous region for the Russians for example.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Race 1st

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Glen19
but in the west the minorities have more rights than the majority

@01123581379
3 days ago
“Democracy means run by Jews” – Ezra Pound

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@Glen19
I believe the Russian constitution recognises the Russian state as the ethnic expression of the Russian people, minority rights notwithstanding.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

@Glen19
3 days ago
That being said. Multiethnic States always have a dominant ethnic group. Tajiks, Russians and other minorities still have rights and even privileges but the Han is the dominant ethnic group

@RonP1
3 days ago
I find people try to complicate our situation to confuse people, it’s all pretty simple stuff

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
We need a White ADL to protect our people from antiwhiteism..just like jews do for antisemitism

Matt Parrott
3 days ago
It’s a ball and cup game where Joel pretends that Neonazism is just “nationalism purified.” It is not, and the historically and ethnically contingent elements of the NSDAP are inextricably tangled up in NS and its contemporary Neonazi tribute band.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Nazi……We don’t use that term

@Glen19
3 days ago
The Nation State is a European idea. Most States in the world aren’t nation States. Russia is a multinational State. China is a State of the 56 ethnicities that are recognized in the constitution. Iran is not a nation state and is multiethnic.

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)
With the mass immigration now going on Racial-Fascism/NS is the only way

@nationless8nationalist
3 days ago
as boomer. My friends all were into materialism and comforts of money. Nobody was interested back then in comfortable quality of life. Meaning and truth was not as inportant as a strong economy. If a man does not care about meaning of life. Its it mate. Community building is best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Breaking the lies about National Socialism is crucial to reverse the intellectual damage done to the West in the post WWII period.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
we need White Unity worldwide period…or else we will be crushed even more

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Yagoda
agreed

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
If I was an employer I would be embarrassed to pay a brother less than a living wage. Many can’t afford a dependable vehicle and housing simultaneously.

Vettekid1488
3 days ago
Greg admitted he’s a liberal

@Daniel
3 days ago
NSN is epic

@Daniel
3 days ago
Pushing NS also frees up space in the wake of it for other groups which are less hardline

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Greg Johnson is a republican. His ideology is post-war boomerism with a bit of racial awareness

Louis Cachet
3 days ago
joel please show us your tattoos

@Spozzfreund
3 days ago
That is not the circle Keith surrounds himself with…

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
NS is a threat also because it is fundamentally revolutionary, and it questions the fundaments of modern spirituality and society at the root. That is why it’s dangerous.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
I need that pro white turban

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
thats a pro white turban..when an antiwhite touch that turban the amtiwhite turn into dust

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
100%

@RonP1
3 days ago
Most Brits are so thick they don’t even know what each ideology stands for, someone tried telling me Hitler was against Socialists not Leftists

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Conservatism is deeply materialist, and it feels threatened by the non-materialism of NS.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
His timing is very odd, especially given the progress that has been made in recent years when it comes to revising the lies about WWII

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
lol, true

@Daniel
3 days ago
Joel looks like he’s wearing a turban

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Churchill: the best Prime Minister Shekels could buy

@DragonFox
3 days ago
o/

RacismIsNatural
3 days ago
In the long term this will come back to bite Keith

@Daniel
3 days ago
Ahoy there Chief

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Chief_Moody
evening Chief

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Evening troops

@VikingBro
3 days ago
Joel, Tom, Blair and Hersant etc, Our Guys, the Aryan Thunder from Down Under

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
When your oppressors are chronic liars I wouldn’t sweat any missinformation. I never say anything bad about the Axis Powers.

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Joel is based and so is Tom, Jacob, Blair and all the NSN lads

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@GustavusVasa
lol

Gustavus Vasa
3 days ago
We all agree with Joel so no worries Mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
I hope not but it seems he is going down a wrong path

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Joel’s a great guy.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
People have been saying Keith has been off-key for a while now, I don’t want to start any drama but I ignored it up until this.

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel’s a hero!Fighting antiwhiteism and not scared of showing his face while doing it!BIG RESPECT!

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Share this show on Twitter both Joel and Mark are banned!

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Exactly Ron, he’s a weirdo, he also simps for miscegenating prostitutes

@RonP1
3 days ago
Keith Woodstein

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago
Did Woods got compromised?

@RonP1
3 days ago
Why would you go down the road of trying to debunk Europa – very suspicious

RacismIsNatural
3 days ago
Keith just wants to be popular he wants to be liked by guys like Elon

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
youtube

@charlie
3 days ago
episode 8 us accurate

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I remember when Keith came on this week on the alt right with less than 1000 followers on toutube

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Keith Woods debunking of Europa is retarded . He can’t find something on google so he says it isn’t true

@Daniel
3 days ago
Credibility is everything

@Daniel
3 days ago
A lot of it is wrong

@Daniel
3 days ago
Guy who made Europa should have got his facts right though

LiquidZ00\\\FYMM\\\
3 days ago
o/

TribalismOnlyForThem
3 days ago
Joel Davis is a hero for White Western Civilization!Thanks for fighting antiwhiteism Joel!!!

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Indeed so

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@RonP1
Yeah, Odysee always does that. Wish they’d fix bugs but they don’t.

@LeighStewy
3 days ago
Mark and Joel o/

WP Combat
3 days ago
o/

@RonP1
3 days ago
Damn, I wondered why it hadn’t started….I had to press play!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
indeed I think this be good

Reclaim
3 days ago
beanie waffen

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Evening everyone

@dnhotd
3 days ago
startooo

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
log time brother

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
The timing of these attacks on NS is very suspicious. Just at the moment when WWII revisionism is having an impact.

@VikingBro
3 days ago
\o

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
The ProDildo Trump grabs the masses by the crotch.

@Chris
3 days ago
Also, if you want to reach the men, you have to reach the women first… it is always the women who motivates the men to do something.

@Daniel
3 days ago
If Joel ever becomes dictator of Australia then I’m moving down under

@Mitch
3 days ago
Anyone living in London here?

MarcoEire
3 days ago
Evening men

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
o/

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
Hail!

DerCherusker
3 days ago
Hail!

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Good evening.

@Chris
3 days ago
You have to over dramatize, give them a emotional story.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
share the link

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
o/

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Þiudareiks
o7

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
0/

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
This better be based and redpilled! I’m skipping Pete Q for this! haha.

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago

@BlackwaterPark
\o

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Hey! Long time no see.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I really like Keith, but I’m on team Joel for this one.

@Daniel
3 days ago
oy vey

@Þiudareiks
3 days ago
good evening

@RonP1
3 days ago(edited)

@Mitch
I’m on the outskirts, M25 area

Arab Social Nationalist
3 days ago
Greetings goyim

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@Crusader1483
I’d love to see that.

MarcoEire
3 days ago
Has it started yet? says starting soon for me

@Mitch
3 days ago

@RonP1
Just asking because I am

BasedMan83
3 days ago
Joel and Keith should do a debate

@UKPhoenix
3 days ago
Joel to reign as king of the united anglosphere by 2033

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Exiting, let’s goo

@RonP1
3 days ago

@Mitch
Why?

MarcoEire
3 days ago
If any White nation gets a NS government I’ll move there.

@Chris
3 days ago
In my opinion we can’t just hit the masses with pure facts… we have to repackage it in emotional moving container… thats what hitler meant by the mass has a female quality to it, you only will move the masses if you grab them with emotions, you have to emotionally move them.

Teutonic Truth
3 days ago
NeoBolshevik Stalkers want to rape and murder people that don’t want to be near them.

@Chris
3 days ago
it is like chocolate, you can wrap it in any package you want, give it any shape you want, it will always stay chocolate at its core, thats what we have to do with national socialism, we have to repackage it.

@RonP1
3 days ago
Race is the basis of all true politics – our degenerate system is upside down and is attempting to bring about the mongrelisation of the British people

@Chris
3 days ago
Well you would have to elaborate what you mean by ns, because National Socialism is not just aesthetics, it is also aesthetics, but its not just the swastika, it is the thing that is underneath the swastika, the deeper meaning or truth that is ns.

@Daniel
3 days ago
We need to spam TikTok with as many NS videos as we can

@Chris
3 days ago

@eddiesdreaming
Well, thats the thing, we can’t change the problem, we have to deal with it, it is like having a crippled leg, you can’t change it, you have to work with it.

@Chris
3 days ago
that is also why hitler spent years of his life studying Communism and all of their tactics, in order to understand how they manipulate the masses and which tricks and oppositional methods he had to break through. We have to do the same, the enemy hasn’t changed , only the methods have.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
that sounds like quite a big problem to change

@Chris
3 days ago
Well, in my opinion, our biggest enemy is Conformity… Schopenhauer talks about it… the will to live and survive is so strong that it forces the masses into conformity, even if it means they are wrong… Hitler briefly talks about it too in his book, saying the mass has a female quality to it.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
honestly think we have to self segregate , from liberal whites ,they are dangerous

@WhiteZealot
3 days ago
Socialism must be paired with duties. All men must do at least 2 years in the military. If you’ve taken more from the state than you’ve given to it, you don’t get to vote or serve on a jury or hold office.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@Chris
tbh it could be our best hope of revival , god knows we need a general awakening like yesterday .

@RonP1
3 days ago
Anything has got to be better than this Judeo-Masonic Dictatorship in disguise, that goes by the name of Democracy

@Chris
3 days ago
National Socialism is based in reality and truth, it is not just some weird esoteric ideology that we try to force on to reality, to say “we can’t resurrect National Socialism” is like saying “let’s bury the truth and deny reality, because its not good optics to say race is real.”

@DragonFox
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
I’m two subs away from 1k, if you have time for a psychedelic music break:
Subliminal
Subliminal

@DragonFox: Subliminal
More

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
I say yes

@Daniel
3 days ago
Heil Joel

ZoMoeVanMensenDieDeHeletijdHalveWaarhedenVerspreiden
3 days ago

@Johnny
Well, we should do that since Europe has more commies than Germany back then

@Johnny
3 days ago
the whole argument is so stupid. NO ONE is saying we should walk around in brown shirts doing Roman salutes. But if you cant see what Germany was up against and fought for and how that is still important today.

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
Genetics

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
and a breeding programme

@eddiesdreaming
3 days ago
the main JD and the answer is of course it can , nothing else came close to what we need

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 days ago
We have the cure. Sieg Heil \o

@Ral9010NatSoc
3 days ago
Commies, jews, cuckservatives, democrats, liberals, trannies, pedos and all the other hedonistic degenerates fear
National Socialism because they know it would be game over in a NS state. Hence why NS is the most demonized ideology. Our modern world is sick and the symptoms are everywhere.

@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago
Reclaim Europa (and European-Founded nations: USA, Canada, Australia and NZ)

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
We need a billionaire to buy us a nazi island we can all live on together…

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript