Mark Collett: And welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review. It’s that time of the week again and we’re here for episode number 370! Can you believe we’re closing in on 400 episodes? I can’t! Time flies when you’re having fun and we’ve certainly had some fun over the years, but it’s been a long road. And we’ve still got a lot more distance to cover. And we’ve got some big things to discuss tonight. I’ve got an amazing guest here tonight and we’re gonna basically set the world to rights and discuss what the changing political dynamic in Britain is going to yield for the nationalist cause.

 

But before we do that, please do like and share the stream. We’re live on Rumble. We’re live on Odysee. Get the word out there because I’m the truth teller that’s banned on X. Elon Musk, he likes to tell people he’s all about truth and fairness. Not when it comes to the hard truth that I’m talking about. Please help me share the stream. Get the word out. Let’s get these viewing figures up and like the stream because this is going to be worth watching.

 

Secondly, I’ve got a lot of things coming up this week.

 

Firstly, I published a very long article, the longest I’ve written to date, six and a half thousand words called Why the Conservatives are Worse than Labour and Why They Must be Destroyed. This article is now up on my Substack. It’s free for everyone to read and it’s a historical piece that works up to the modern day here and now. And it discusses how it’s not the far-Left, it’s not the Labour Party, it’s not the Left at all that’s destroyed every single nationalist or anti-immigration movement this country’s had to offer. It’s actually the Conservative Party. They did it in 79, they did it in 2010, they did it in 2017, they did in 2019. It’s always the Conservative party!

 

David Clews: Can I just jump in there very quickly? Do you know what makes me think about. Tony Blair was basically a conservative as well in 97. In many ways that was what his famous thing was. So as you say, it’s all been conservative or conservative like policies that’s led to this. A hardcore Left-winger wouldn’t have opened the borders the way Blair did. So no, you’re 100% right.

 

Mark Collett: Well, this article is very important. It’s free for you to read on my Substack. It’s six and a half thousand words long, too long for many, I’m told! If you are one of those people who likes the deep dive, please, please go and give it a read. The links are for my Substack, are in the description. They’re also the pinned comment in the chat. And you can support me on Substack financially.

 

Secondly, I did a show with Patrick Slattery on Monday. I’m gonna do a show with David Duke tomorrow. I’ll be live on Friday, and on Sunday the Film Club returns. It was meant to be on Sunday but it was Father’s Day. But it returns for the review of the new Uwe Boll film which deals with the issue of a Right-wing vigilante dealing rather decisively with migrant rape gangs.

 

So you’re going to want to watch that. And we’ve got a very special guest. I’m not going to tell you who it is, but when you see, you will be shocked!

 

Anyway, that’s something for Sunday. So I’ve got loads of things coming up this week and I’ll also have another Substack out on Friday. At the moment I am writing up the harrowing case of the murder and sexual abuse of Preston Davy and how it was essentially given the green light by the system because Preston’s adopted parents were obviously a homosexual couple.

 

Lots to come. I’m working very hard. Please support me if you can financially, send Superchats, you can Superchat live via Rumble. All Superchats are gratefully received. Please consider giving something. Nothing I do goes behind the paywall. $3, $5, $10, whatever you can afford. If you can be more generous, please do remember it goes to a good cause. No one in Britain is pumping out the amount of material I am. I’ve got a very active Substack. If you can’t subscribe over here on Rumble, go over to Substack. Make a monthly contribution there. It really does help! I’m producing two long form articles a week. No one is producing that much content over on Substack. Go and subscribe. It’s free, anyone can read it, but help me there if you can. Also donate to me via Crypto. All the crypto links are in the description below.

 

And finally you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Please support me, please. Superchat. Please help us financially. We are the only ethno-nationalist group in Britain openly fighting for White rights. Help us. Support us. Show that you care.

 

Anyway, let’s get into the show. We’ve got David Clews with me tonight. And we’ve got David Clews with me for a reason. Not only is he a good friend of mine, not only does he have really good takes but he’s a guy who’s called things right. He’s one of the few people who stuck his neck out on the line and said the unpopular thing, made the unpopular takes and stuck with that and recently he’s been proved correct. He’s got an excellent channel and news network called the Unity News Network. They are now on Rumble as well. Please support him there. Please follow him. Please sub him. He deserves it. I was lucky enough to be on his show. Was it last night?

 

David Clews: Monday.

 

Mark Collett: Monday night and we had an excellent show. It’s very good. Very very hard hitting about the situation in Makerfield.

 

But David, how have you been my friend? Are you surviving this heat wave? My shirt is already stuck to me. I actually do feel relatively uncomfortable and people are lucky that they’ve got the camera feed tonight because I was thinking about basically doing this in my underwear with the camera off. It is oppressively hot! Are you surviving where you are?

 

[05:51]

 

David Clews: Yes. No. Absolutely fine! It’s not too terrible. So I had the milk in the freezer and the glass in the freezer, as. Well, that’s one thing always say about Spain is they really know how, … I’m not in Spain of course, but they know how to chill a drink. And if there’s one thing I don’t like it’s an unchilled drink. So I had my glass was being in the freezer. I had my milk in the freezer as well. So it’s cold and it is hitting well.

 

So yeah, all good, all good. And it was interesting you said this is show number 370. And I always liked a wee bit of gematria and I looked up and a famous 370. The number 370 is most famously associated with the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 that went missing. And there is still no proper explanation of where it went. So there’s number 370. I hope Patriotic Weekly Review doesn’t go the way of that flight! [chuckling] But it’s an interesting one. You know I haven’t actually done a deep dive on. I’m sure many of my conspiratorial friends will have some theories on that but I mean it’s just incredible to think that an airline all those years ago just went missing and still nobody knows what happened.

 

Mark Collett: No, no. Do you know what? I was very interested in the case at the time. Did they ever find the aeroplane?

 

David Clews: Never! They’ve never found it and they’ve never given a proper explanation of what happened. 12 years.

 

Mark Collett: The problem is, and I am conspiratorially minded, but I’m also aware of how vast the Pacific Ocean [Indian Ocean] is. And I think where it crashed, wasn’t it in that sort of dead zone where effectively almost as far from land as you can be.

 

So there’s a apparently there’s a buoy in the Pacific Ocean. And if you end up coming, so if you’re in a plane and you crash and you’re like:

 

“Thank goodness there’s a buoy in the ocean. I’m going to hold on to it!”

 

That would actually be the worst thing ever because you would have crashed at the point where you are geographically further from any land as you would be anywhere else, you know, within the ocean.

 

You know, I think at that point you’re basically screwed!

 

But, yeah, when you’re over those kind of depths of ocean and that kind of sort of its almost like an oceanic wilderness, isn’t it? I wonder how it went down.

 

David Clews: As I said, there is literally no conclusive theory. It’s funny, a few people in the chat are saying it was full of highly skilled semiconductors scientists who were Chinese.

 

I mean, when you hear stuff like that, I mean, again, they could have just been there purely by accident and they were going to go work somewhere. But to lose an airline is really incredible! And as I said, there’s still no answer or anything definitive as to where it went. I remember watching a programme about it and it was like they said:

 

“Maybe the pilot. It was an elaborate suicide attempt.”

 

That was the kind of one they were going with, but just absolutely crazy! And one of these unexplained mysteries that I’m sure there’s a lot more to it than meets the eye.

 

Mark Collett: I do find these things really interesting. Somebody saying it’s wasn’t actually in the Pacific, apparently it was in the Indian Ocean.

 

So I don’t know. I thought it was over the Pacific. But very interesting what happened there. And it’s something that it captivated me at the time. I find things like this phenomenally interesting. But I also find it really odd that planes like that don’t have some kind of transponder.

 

[10:03]

 

David Clews: They do. It went missing or something turned off. I don’t know. I think that’s the whole point. It was, you shouldn’t be able to turn that off. It emanates like a signal that should be on at all times. A really odd one.

 

Mark Collett: Do you think they’ll ever find it? Because sometimes these things happen and there are sort of obviously conspiracy theories etc, but then years later somebody just stumbles upon something or comes up with a theory and checks something and it all sort of works out.

 

David Clews: There was, there was another one. I don’t know if you want. I do like my slop. See, because we watch, we deal with such high value things. There was one called the Disappearance of Amy Bradley. Have you seen that one at all or heard about that?

 

So this was this girl who was on a cruise ship with her family. It just disappeared, just disappeared off the face of the earth. Initially they thought that she’d fallen off the side, but then there was all these sightings of her. People say they saw her, that she was sold into sex slavery.

 

And again, just same as the McCanns, same as Madeleine McCann!

 

I mean, look, clearly there’s a lot of theories on Madeleine McCann, but there is still no like even official response to what happened. Just another mystery. The Amy Bradley one’s very good. It’s very good if you can watch that.

 

Mark Collett: I’ll look into that. I mean, one thing that gets me though, with some of these sightings, you wonder how mentally ill some people are today because there was a girl who claimed that she was Madeline McCann. And it turned out she was just a pure fantasist who had made it all up, very interesting.

 

But look, let’s get on to the issue of the day. I can tell that people will get, people will, chat annoyed that we’re not immediately talking about Andy Burnham. That’s the issue!

 

David Clews: It always reminds me, that situation of in the film the Wolf of Wall Street, when he goes to meet with the Swiss banker.

 

Mark Collett: I’ve not seen it.

 

David Clews: It’s quite a good film, very jewish. But he goes to meet the Swiss banker and the Swiss banker’s doing the chit chat and he’s like:

 

“Look, I don’t really want to do this, I just want to cut to the chase.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Excuse me, you’re in Switzerland, you’re in Europe. We do chit chat for a minimum of 30 minutes before we get down to business.”

 

It is a very British thing as well, isn’t it? The obligatory chit chat.

 

Mark Collett: I’ve always thought about doing shows with certain guests. It wouldn’t work with all guests, but with certain guests where you just said:

 

“Right. Two hours of easy chat, Superchats when they’re relevant.”

 

So if somebody gives a relevant Superchat we interject with it. But some guests would be really good at that. You’re good at that. Devon Stack is very good at that. He’s very good at chatting. Very entertaining. And it is interesting when things, …

 

And I’m somebody who does like sort of murder mysteries. I do like real life crimes. So flight, you know, MH370 was something that did at the time really capture my imagination. But I suppose we may never know or the scary thing is somebody does know because it was planned and we’ll never know. But that’s another thing.

 

The one thing that, the one thing that is interesting do you know another thing that’s interesting, right? One thing that I find really incredible is the amount of dead people on Mount Everest. So all these people who aren’t really qualified to climb Mount Everest go up there, they die, their bodies freeze, never decompose.

 

And apparently the amount of people that now climb Mount Everest is sort of a recreational thing to say they’ve done it. Basically what you end up with is people walking up the mountain and some of the more famous dead bodies are now landmarks.

 

So they’re like what you turn specifically one called Green Boots, who’s a guy that died in these bright, luminous green boots. And people are:

 

“You turn right by Green Boots!”

 

So that’s how people know when they’re almost you almost at the Summit, turn right by Green Boots and it’s like:

 

“Wow!”

 

And apparently it’s also a place where people dump all their rubbish on the way up and on the way down to lighten their load. And it’s one of the most polluted places on the planet because obviously it never degrades, it never breaks down, the bodies never break down. And it’s covered in dead bodies and garbage! Which I find is pretty depressing actually, that this sort of amazing landmark, highest place on the planet and you go up there and it’s just covered in litter and corpses!

 

David Clews: Sounds a bit like [chuckling] sort of India and the subcontinent, doesn’t it! It’s kind of everywhere!

 

Mark Collett: In Glasgow. It’s just rubbish!

 

[14:51]

 

David Clews: That’s what it’s like. It’s funny. Today I watched a video of like India.

 

So for the next two hours my feed is just all videos of how awful India is. And you know when you see that and you see these countries, it’s just so horrific beyond words. I think people, they don’t understand what these countries are like. I’ve never been, but clearly it’s not like these are isolated videos. It shows you India, how dirty it is, the oppressed conditions, people that live in. It’s utterly awful!

 

I mean, I’ve been to Cairo and that’s the most awful place I’ve ever seen in my life! The poverty, the grindingness of it, the dirt on the roads! You know, I did a bit of traveling as well in Bulgaria. And for a European country, it’s dirt poor.

 

And it’s funny the gypsies who are Indians, it looks like India as well. And it’s just awful! And when you say that about Everest, which is the world’s highest mountain, which is, it’s so amazing and it’s just covered in filth!

 

Rockwell. I’ll do that just now. Actually, I’ve forgotten to do that. I’ll do that just now. Post it on X.

 

Mark Collett: You’ve not posted it on, ..! David!

 

David Clews: I’ve not. I know. I’ve been busy. I’ll do it right now!

 

Mark Collett: Now I’m sweating twice as much. I’ve got the general heat of the day. That’s the first thing I want to say though. David.

 

So everyone says, like, global warming isn’t a thing, but we are all melting. And I do wonder. I don’t think man made global warming is a thing, but I do think things are generally getting warmer. I remember when I was a kid, come Christmas, there would always be snow. I remember being snowed in and having days off from school. And it does seem to be getting more intolerable! Now, I don’t think this is down to man made global warming or any such crap! But I do think it is intolerable!

 

And as a White man, I wasn’t made for this! This isn’t northern European weather. Why do I have to put up with this? You know, I mean, and I can’t even open my window while I’m doing the show because I don’t want everyone in the street hearing me bellowing about these issues, trapped in this box of heat.

 

David Clews: I think the weather does change naturally. Like the Romans used to grow great vineyards in North Africa when they were there. North Africa was as fertile as the rest of the Mediterranean. So clearly the climate does shift and change. And I mean, in the 60s and 70s, the big theory was that we were about to enter a new Ice Age.

 

You know, I remember watching the video of like Leonard Nimoys talking about how we’re going to be freezing. But then they’ve moved to the global warming. I think temperatures probably are rising. Someone will know more than me about why. But the whole man made climate change is a scam! Because what it deliberately says is the more CO2 you’ve released as a nation, the more you’ve contributed to this greenhouse effect. And miraculously it manages to blame Britain and the rest of Europe for that and say:

 

“Well, your historical long term CO2 emissions are much higher than India and China.”

 

And the other thing it doesn’t actually take into account is just the pollution from all these countries. I think it is important for people like us to care for the environment and to look for green solutions. But I think man made climate change is a hoax! And I’m sure most would agree with that.

 

Mark Collett: No, I agree with that. I mean I also, the reason why I agree with it is because I know, I always notice the selective application.

 

So you go to places like China, India, Bangladesh that they’re polluting the world to an incredible degree. Their emissions are off the scale, but they’re never hit with the kind of restrictions that Western European countries are hit with.

 

And I’ve got to say, if there’s one thing that makes me proud of being a Western European is that we generally are very sort of, how can I say, environmentally minded. We do like animals, we do like nature, we do try to look after the world we live in. Whereas I think other races are far more:

 

“Well, if it moves, eat it. If it becomes extinct, so be it. Do what we have to do to survive, advance, take over, grow!”

 

Whereas I think we are more empathetic. And that often comes out in a bad way, but sometimes it comes out in a good way. You know, the amount of people I know that sort of save little animals. I mean I once stood on a snail and cracked its shell and I actually bought a special tank and nursed it back to health! Its shell was completely healed and put it back in the garden! You know, that’s the kind of people we are. But sometimes obviously that backfires, which is obviously one of the things we talk about.

 

But David, onto the issue of the day. Starmer’s gone! Burnham’s in!

 

Now, we both said this will have an incredibly positive effect on the Labour Party. And I think that’s true. I think that’s true, Labour are now bouncing. They’re a united party again. There isn’t the infighting.

 

But one thing that shocked me is not just how it’s reunited Labour, but how it’s also painted them in a better light. And even the Tory press seemed to be giving them a little bit, not total, but a little bit of a pat on the back.

 

[20:41]

 

This does seem to have rejuvenated them. I’m pretty good with my predictions, but I was actually shocked that Burnham took 55% of the vote. And it almost feels, … Sorry for the horrible turn of phrase, but I can’t think of any better way to say this, but as if there’s been a Great Reset, as if there’s been a situation where, because when you have a Prime minister come in with a giant majority like Starmer did, you tend to have a honeymoon period. Thatcher, Blair, both of them had long reigns with sizable honeymoons. For Starmer to come in as a new party taking power from a deeply unpopular party and to have completely fluffed it in just over 18 months is unprecedented! And I kind of feel like this has pushed the reset button and Burnham’s almost being Heralded as the guy that Starmer should have been back in July of 2024. It feels like Labour have effectively had a do over here.

 

David Clews: I think, as we’ve pointed out, and I’ve certainly been saying, it is amazing the way the wider British security state works. I mean, sometimes you just have to look at it, as Agent Smith says, have you ever looked at it and just marveled at it? And what they’ve done with Burnham is incredible! They’ve given him this Coronation, the train coming from Manchester, the crowds cheering him, [chuckling] and he’s now there and then all the MPs are there. And as you say, it’s just given this an entire new lease of life.

 

And the problem that you actually have is that with Burnham, and I’ve been thinking about this today, what’s our angle of attack going to be against them? You know, because he’s not Keir Starmer. He’s not like a robot, he’s not a system pig. He can actually sit and speak to people.

 

And again, people are going to cope about it. He’s very relatable. I’ve watched his stuff. I remember his Hillsborough speech and he came across well. Now he’s a career politician. He’s ZOGged up to his eyeballs. I get all these things, but from a normie’s perspective, he is like A-list material, Andy Burnham. And he doesn’t wear the suit either, he wears the T-shirt. And actually people are going to say:

 

“You two are loving him!”

 

And he actually looks really good for 56. He actually keeps himself in pretty good shape for someone who’s 56. And I mean, that is true. Politics is all about PR and image. And Burnham really has it. And listen what they’ve done, the media, they are roasting Farage.

 

I mean, I’ve been talking about this, I’ve seen that they all have decided they’re going to destroy Farage. And the Right-wing press built him up. The Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Sun. And now they’re spitting them back out!:

 

“You took five million quid, you said you were a man of the people!”

 

And now all the Right-wing press, they’re basically Burnham is going to be like a Tony Blair figure that is going to unite all the factions in the regime behind them. And it’s ominous!

 

[24:25]

 

Mark Collett: I think it’s ominous. I can see us, … In my article and I’m pushing my Substack heavily, but I’ll tell you why.

 

Firstly, I like writing these long articles and I feel like I’m not bad at it either. I didn’t think I’d enjoy writing them as much as I do. But I like laying everything out in article format because I feel it’s in many ways easier to digest for people and to add notations, etc.

 

But also it’s good because you can go back and alter the article and I’m actually thinking of revising my recent one on demographics because more information has come to light of the last two weeks that actually says that what everything I was saying was correct, basically. And I’m going to add to it with notation saying this is new information. But it furthers my point.

 

But in my long article I published yesterday, I did say that there is a level of what you could call institutional Deep State power that both the Conservatives and Labour have, which is basically, it’s like, and I describe them as an iceberg. What you see above the waterline, the politicians, obscures this massive institutional power network beneath the waterline. And this was the exact analogy that I chose to make during that article. And because they have that vast network beneath the waterline, unless you completely destroy them as a Parliamentary presence, which would then cause the whole thing to crumble, they will always, as long as they maintain at the very least the position of being the opposition, they will always re-form.

 

And that’s what I said in my article. And essentially we’re in a situation here where for a very brief period it looked as if Reform were going to break both sides of that illusory political divide. They were going to completely crush the Tories, they were going to take almost every marginal seat. But on top of that, the White Red Wall, former sort of working class, sort of mining town seats were all, or secondary industry like your manufacturing seats. So Newcastle, Sunderland, Makerfield, these areas were all going to fall to Reform as well. And you’re going to finally see the two party system completely collapse in on itself.

 

But all of a sudden it seems to have resuscitated itself!

 

And one thing that really does amaze me and I’ve got to say this, and it is very critical of White people. But how much can we take? How much can we take? And that’s a genuine question because what have we seen? Unprecedented grooming, two tiered justice, the jailing of Right-wing anti-immigration political dissidents. We’ve seen mass murders on the streets, terrorist atrocities. You know, we’ve had the Manchester bombing, we’ve had Southport, we’ve had the Belfast beheading, we’ve had Valdo Calocane in Nottingham the Nottingham spree killer.

 

It happens again and again and again! And the more people speak out about it, the more we see the state clamp down on us, the more we see this rise of two tier justice. We’ve had fathers arrested for trying to free their daughters from the grooming gangs, and immigration has just carried on unabated to different levels. The demographic shift has always continued, maybe at slightly differing rates. We now around 70% of the population, but by the next general election we will be under 70% for sure. But people are still voting Labour! 55% of their people in Makerfield still voted for Andy Burnham and he’s just received the kind of Coronation that you would expect of an almost like Napoleonic character!

 

Like when Napoleon marched on Paris and every roadblock that was meant to prevent him from getting there sort of not only didn’t stop him, but the people at that roadblock fell at his feet, you know, declared him the Emperor and joined his march on Paris. That’s kind of what you’re seeing with Burnham. They’ve almost played him as a folk hero. You know, this trip down to Manchester, you said it so well on your show with me. The night they actually had helicopter footage of him arriving in Nottingham:

 

“The northern hero arrived to put the shit out of touch Starmer creature to death! And when he’s done this we will be free!”

 

But this was Sky News, this was BBC, this was ITV, this Daily Mail! They all did it!

 

[29:14]

 

David Clews: Here’s the thing that’s really crystallised for me over the last few months. And this is one of the reasons why I’ve been so aggressive against people like pushing Restore, saying that it’s going to solve all our problems or re-migration is going to solve all the problems. I’m not doing it because I’m being nasty. I’m just doing it because I’m being honest with people about the situation. And this was the real statistic that hit home for me. Well, there was actually two recently. The budget every year for the security services in this country, GCHQ, MI5, MI6 is £5 billion per annum. Five billion quid they spend on the security services! Just an incredible sum of money!

 

So that’s what they do. The City of London every single day turns over in currency trading alone, $5 trillion per day! 5 trillion, right! How many people in Britain have a house in the Cotswolds, a flat in London? How many people have a lifestyle where they’re jetting around the world, they’re going to conferences, they’re going to football matches, they’re going to Wimbledon. You just, and I don’t mean this to be nasty to you, but you don’t really have any comprehension of the life these people live. They will spend in a day and not even notice it what you will likely earn in a year. What I will likely earn in a year.

 

Okay, so if you take the Mafia, the people that say they run the coke trade in Britain, the Albanians, they’re prepared to kill and be ruthless in order to maintain their lifestyle. What do you think the people way above them that runs this country are going to do? They’re going to kill! They’re going to jail you and they’re going to use every single trick in the book to keep themselves in that lifestyle! And they’re just not giving up, they’re not going to give up the house in the Cotswolds. Because you know why it’s even more important for them now? Because the country is full of immigrants. [chuckling] They need to live in their White areas. They need to fly first class, they need like HS2 to get them quickly to their country retreats.

 

So you have an elite that is embedded into power and will use every single trick in the book that it has, and none more so than the mainstream media and the power and the might of the mainstream media. Like people always say:

 

“Oh, nobody listens to the news anymore!”

 

Nonsense! Millions and millions and millions of people still listen to the BBC and trust the BBC and Sky News and the Daily Mail and the Guardian and the Telegraph and LBC and talk TV, you know, need to go on?

 

Mark Collett: No, mate, I agree. I think one of the problems is. And bear with me here, guys, because I don’t want to seem like, I don’t want to annoy people. Look, when I say these things and I’m right. I don’t want to annoy people by being right. I’m not doing this to sort of be smug and pour like cold water on everyone’s fire. I’m doing it because I can see what’s going wrong because I’ve been involved in this bloody thing for 26 years! And I can see these things now.

 

Look, when I was initially involved in the BNP, back in the day, when I first got involved in politics, the bubble was what I called the “pub bubble”.

 

And I remember when I was first standing in elections, I would go into pubs and people would be like:

 

“Mark, surely. Oh, mate, I saw you on TV! I’m voting for you. We’re all voting for him, aren’t we, lads? Yeah, everyone down the pubs, right? Oh, we’re all voting for you, mate!”

 

And it was brilliant! You’d walk out of there feeling like:

 

“Yeah, we’re doing this!”

 

Because everyone in the pub was voting for you. Come election day you’d get 20%, you come second, but you weren’t winning. Now the issue is that pub nonsense, that was 20, 30 lads in the pub saying:

 

“We all vote for you!”

 

David Clews: On X now.

 

Mark Collett: No, it was a bubble. But now it’s on X. And it’s not 20, 30, lads. It’s 300, 400, maybe a thousand people building this national bubble that people think is like the real deal:

 

“Look, look, he’s just got 3,000 likes on his X post! Oh, my God, we’re gonna do it! Have you seen 300 retweets? Oh, my God! Look, we’ve ratioed him!”

 

And unfortunately, it’s just a national or even international sort of recreation of the:

 

“All me mates down the pub are voting for you.”

 

You’re winning, and they’re not. Or maybe they are, but maybe that tap room in that smoky pub isn’t representative of everyone in the council ward where you’re standing.

 

And what I’m saying is, fundamentally we’re in a situation, a weird one, where people surround themselves now with people who are like them, have the same feelings, the same opinions, the same desires. And it forms this feedback loop where they absolutely believe that they’re going to win because they’re not exposing themselves to the real world. And X isn’t the real world.

 

Okay, somebody in the chat just put that. Somebody’s put, X is not real life. That’s one of the things with the Restore. They thought it was. And look, David, you said something to me and I didn’t know how big it was. I did a stream the other night and I said:

 

“Look, Restore had a thousand people out in Makerfield, but they mismanaged it.”

 

And David actually got me the figures. Labour had 3,000 out in Makerfield. But the thing is, Labour didn’t arrange them in a park, take pictures, get a load of spergy influencers and auditors to film it all. Have them all wearing gaudy Union Jack outfits and turn it into a circus. They had 3,000 people who were highly trained people, …

 

David Clews: Every day! Every day!

 

[35:29]

 

Mark Collett: And flew it under the radar so the other parties didn’t know what they were up against. And the issue is this. When you see all of this on X and you convince yourself that Restore are gonna have to win because of the thousand people and they can’t lose and you know, all the influencers out there and the auditors are streaming it, you’re meant to think that so that on election day, when you get a poultry 6.8% and less than the BNP did in 2010, you’re heartbroken and demoralised. That’s the point of it! It was all mismanaged.

 

And what you’re seeing here is the reality of a highly powerful system that by design can, … Unless it is run out of those top two positions in Parliament, it will always re-form. And that’s what you’re seeing with Burnham. But worse still, and not many people are covering this:

 

“The Tories are dead, mate! They’re never coming back!”

 

David Clews: No one’s voting for an African. No one’s voting for an African.

 

Mark Collett: They won the Aberdeen South by-election on the same day as Makerfield. And all of a sudden you’re now seeing two by-elections on the same day and two winners. Who are the two winners, David? Labour and the Tories. Not Reform, not Restore, not the Greens! Boom!

 

David Clews: 26.1% swing in Aberdeen South for the Tories. 26.1%

 

Now, clearly there was local issues because Labour and the SNP have decimated the oil and gas industry. But again, who did the public turn to? Who did the public say:

 

“Well, I’m sick of the SNP and Labour. Who am I going to turn to?”

 

Well, funnily enough, there wasn’t a Restore candidate because Restore didn’t stand in Aberdeen South. Therefore, that meant the only option was Reform or the Tories. And what did people in that area say? They’re going to vote Tory! That party led by an African anchor baby!

 

Because here’s the thing, and I keep pointing this out to people, if you’re fucked and you’re out of a job and you’ve got a huge mortgage, you know, house price. Aberdeen’s a really good example. I remember going to Aberdeen, like 2010. There was Ferraris and Porsches everywhere. House prices are down 20 to 30% from the peak. People are really struggling. There was really well paid oil and gas jobs.

 

So these are people who maybe have a wife, kids. Do you think they really give a shit if the woman’s African or not? Is she going to get me back to work in the North Sea? Is she going to get me back so I can feed my kids? And whether people like it or not, they see the Tories, it doesn’t even matter about her. They just know that the Tories are against Net Zero and they want to open it up again. So they’re going to vote Tory. There is not a huge amount of thought going into it!

 

And this again is, we are spergs. We, I sperg, go over everything, but I’m not spergy enough. Let me be clear. I am spergy enough to know that not everybody thinks like that. Most people vote on a reasonably shallow basis as well, and simplify it.

 

And as I say, the number one issue out there right now is the economy is the cost of living! It doesn’t affect over 60s. Primarily people who own their own homes or people who are okay. Anyone under 60, you know this, Mark, you’re a father of two, I’m a father of two. Everyone sees it, like, even people who have money say:

 

“I just went out to the cinema and had a meal and it was 300 quid!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Anybody affording anything now?”

 

It’s hitting home. And that’s what it’s the economy, stupid! It’s not that Charlie Downs was on the other day and he said:

 

“The number one issue that British people have is demographics!”

 

No, it isn’t that! That is just a straight up lie! The number one problem facing Britain is demographics, but that’s not what voters think. And you know what? The customer is always right! It’s like, hi, the customer comes into Charlie Downs, I’d like to order a margherita pizza. No, I don’t think you should have that. I think you should have a steak and I think you should have this. It’s much better for you. What’s he gonna do? The customer’s gonna get up, he’s gonna walk out and say:

 

“I’m not going to be patronised by you, I’m gonna go somewhere else and they’ll give me what I want!”

 

[39:59]

 

Mark Collett: Look, I agree fundamentally and worse still, and I’ve got to say this, I can hear people saying this. So this is going to be one of my little skits about the way the British people think. It’s not what I think, but I can hear people saying this:

 

“Look, I quite like what Nigel Farage has to say, but I’m a bit scared that my black friend will think I’m a racist if I vote for him. But that Kemi Badenoch, she’s saying the same thing. And if I vote for her, I can tell all my mates down the pub, Big John the black bouncer, what can he say? Cuz she’s black as well! I’m not a racist. And this proves it!”

 

You can hear people rationalizing it in this way. People in the Conservative Party voted her as their leader because they thought it would finally put to bed Left-wing accusations of racism. Because fundamentally people are far more concerned with the feelings of their non-White friend than they are about any notion of saving their own race! And this is the problem that we have.

 

And I’ve got to say this, I’m as sickened by this as I could be! I’m sat here, beads of sweat dripping down my brow. And I can tell you it annoys me more than anything to think that my fellow White Britons are more likely to vote for a black woman who describes herself as a first generation migrant than they are a White man who openly talks about demographics, because they’re so scared of the accusation of racism. It annoys me, it riles me, it sickens me, makes me want to puke my guts up! But the fact is its true! And that’s the sad thing.

 

I mean, you know this as well as I do, David, the Left know that because of the demographic shifts it’s very unlikely that a single anti-immigration party would now be able to get over 50% of the popular vote.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: And in fact no party post Second World War has ever got over 50% of the popular vote.

 

So if you know, one party was to take now 50% of the White British vote, that would firstly be unprecedented, it would be an all time high.

 

But secondly it would only result in 35% of the vote share because what we’ve been reduced to, we’re in a bad place now! And part of it is this suicidal empathy, this cycle of self hate and shame that Whites are caught up in!

 

David Clews: But there are positives from it. And I know this is going to be a bitter pill to swallow. This is the other thing and I’ve really come to this. We can’t hitch our bandwagon to talk TV, GB News, the Sun, etc. Because they are taking us up a dead end.

 

The reality is, with the growth of like extreme Leftism, there actually comes opportunities for us. And the one I’m going to give you is Mamdani in New York. Now clearly I don’t like Zoran Mamdani, I don’t like his politics.

 

However, he is anti-zionist! He’s not anti-jewish, but he’s anti-zionist. He calls out big business and wealth inequality. And you know what? He got all his three candidates in the elections to be the candidates through. And that is a huge winning formula. And [Nick] Fuentes, I listen to Fuente’s speech and again I know there’s a lot of problems with Fuentes, but he made a brilliant point. He sees a Left-wing populist coalition emerging in America because people just want to stick it to the man, they’re sick of it! They’re sick of seeing these billionaires, they’re sick of seeing the fact that they’re struggling.

 

I mean I read a thing Warren Balogh posted that millions and millions of Americans have now lost their SNAP payments. SNAP is a system that gives you money towards food vouchers. And it’s particularly White Americans that have lost their SNAP programs. So there’s millions of Americans out there who are White have lost their programme that helped them pay towards their bills while they’re struggling. And that’s gone. And this is where there really is this cataclysm coming because from a demographic and an open borders thing, the worst thing that could happen is these people come in.

 

But on the other hand it’s a good thing because they’re challenging international capital, international finance. Because the fundamental is, if you look at our perhaps politics as a mixture of elements of nationalism, elements of socialism. Did I say it? It is a Third Position. And you recognise that without a system that cares for its people and looks after its people, they’re going to be led like lambs to the slaughter.

 

And I just wonder with a lot of people when it comes to voting, they’ll be like:

 

“Look, I know the country’s fucked! I know there’s darkies everywhere, but you know what? See if I can have a few Bob in my pocket, at least I can jump on that plane. I can get on the cheap, I can get to Luton and get over to Benidorm, or I can go and I can still live my life.”

 

And I think that is the other problem is, especially with re-migration and putting the country first. People are selfish and narcissistic. As you pointed out. It’s horrible, but it isn’t really their fault. That’s the system. They’ve been told to be selfish, narcissistic, to look after themselves first! That’s a tough sell to them, that they’re going to get poorer, but the country’s going to be better,

 

[46:08]

 

Mark Collett: I think as well. Like you just said, there is this issue, isn’t there, that fundamentally people are also selfish. They’re cowardly, they’re selfish and when it comes down to it, they gravitate back to what they know. They want stability, they don’t want to rock the boat. Fundamentally, British people don’t like rocking the boat!

 

David Clews: They’re very conservative! That’s the thing. See, this is the thing people don’t realise. They go on about how women, White liberal women, they’re just voting to maintain the system. They’re showing the true innate conservatism. The system is open borders, love of foreigners. Women are just doing what the system tells them to do!

 

And that’s the thing, it does show an innate conservativeness that exists in Britain. It’s like people get annoyed when they say:

 

“Yeah, my granddad voted Labour, my dad voted Labour and I voted Labour!”

 

That’s actually quite, in some ways it’s so annoying, but it’s also like there is also something wholesome about that they’re carrying on that family tradition. Mark, just to say one thing, I’ve got a clip there that you might want to play. It’s with Rupert Lowe.

 

Mark Collett: It doesn’t have any [word unclear] or swearing?

 

David Clews: No. Do you want to put it on and I’ll play it so this is Rupert Lowe and his latest podcast, Patrick Bet-David.

 

Now, again, let me just clarify a few things about Lowe. Lowe went on a podcast with Eric Weinstein, whose brother is Bret Weinstein, the guy who gave the middle finger to the Arch of Titus, because he’s jewish and they hated what [chuckling] was done 2,000 years ago! Rupert Lowe’s now on with Patrick Bet-David. Patrick Bet-David is an Iranian exilist. Massive ZOG shill! Pushes, crypto scams.

 

Anyway, this is a statement Rupert Lowe’s made. He said in the previous podcast with Bret Weinstein that he detested ethno-nationalism. This is his latest:

 

“Lowe: Has Muslim worship at Windsor and things. I mean, he’s certainly very keen to propagate a multicultural society, which again, I have no problem with if people integrate. And they accept the prevailing laws and culture of the people they come and live amongst.”

 

David Clews: ‘I have no problem with a multicultural society as long as they integrate’.

 

Mark Collett: Do you know what, David, I gotta say this. I’m starting to feel that there’s two different Rupert Lowes. There’s Rupert Lowe, who is the real Rupert Lowe, and then there is somebody operating Rupert Lowe’s Twitter pretending to be Rupert Lowe.

 

And I think we’ve got somebody operating that Twitter who puts together snappily written, almost ethno-nationalist tweets as kind of rage bait, you know, Right-wing air punching slop. And then effectively Rupert doesn’t actually know what’s going up there. Because everything that Rupert says when he’s in an interview, whether it’s with Eric Weinstein, whether it’s with Michael Gove, it doesn’t matter. He says something which is very different to what his Twitter account would have you believe, he thinks.

 

So on one hand you have him saying:

 

“There’s far more to being British than just a passport!”

 

And everyone goes berserk.

 

But then he’ll start talking about the need for a meritocracy, the need for colour-blind immigration, the need for skilled migrants abroad, or he’ll start talking about his pride in the fact that his son has married a North African Muslim. And it’s kind of strange because you see these ethno-nationalists on Twitter sort of cheering him on. But they’re the same people that would be saying that his son’s spouse should be deported!

 

[50:20]

 

David Clews: Well, [chuckling] they were very quiet. Well, I can actually tell you who runs his Twitter account. It’s a guy actually called Alistair Harrison. And I need to do a bit more digging into him, but he runs, it’s called a communication company called Alistair Harrison Communications.

 

So there’s been a few people that have talked about him. Apparently he’s been involved in business with Rupert Lowe for quite some time. He’s helped him with PR. Obviously, this guy has a very, … He was the guy., … I don’t know if you saw the clip where the Restore candidate, the Telegraph, asked if they could have an interview with him. And he said no. He’s basically Rupert Lowe’s handler. And this guy clearly is a very effective communicator. He has certainly done it.

 

But more and more people are actually, … And this was always my point. Rupert Lowe is a neo-liberal, Thatcherite, Tory! I mean, his age will make him like that, his background will make him like that’s just who he is.

 

And I think that the thing that bugged me the most about it was if people had just said:

 

“Look, clearly we’re not going to do anything with Reform. Let’s just see what we can do with Restore. Let’s get our people in. Let’s see what we can do.”

 

I would have been all right with that. The thing that got my back up was people saying that:

 

“Rupert is our leader. Don’t you dare counter signal them. This is it. This is our last chance!”

 

And that’s why I think I’ve been so aggressive over the last few weeks and months against people, is the way in which it was artificially implanted into people’s minds about Restore.

 

And again, I use the relationship analogy. If you meet a girl on a night out and you go back home with her and you have amazing, like, you know what happens and it’s all great. But then a few weeks later, you’ll be like:

 

“She does that [chuckling] on the first date? She does that?”

 

You know what I mean? And then:

 

“All right, okay, she’s want to go out with her friends!”

 

It’s the same scenario. Good relationships, like our relationship, you know, at the start, we were actually quite prickly with each other and were quite combative. But then a friendship developed, and that is a much more strong grounding for something, rather than just immediately going all in. Because I use the analogy with Restore. It’s like a crypto pump and dump! It went straight up, it boomed! And the problem is, see, when you go vertical like that, what goes up must come down.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. I mean, at this point, I think people need to really assess what’s going on here. And I think people really need to look at this and ask, honestly, if any other politician was saying these two different things. If their Twitter was saying one thing, but every interview they said another, would they be trusting them?

 

David Clews: No!

 

Mark Collett: Look, I want to move on to something slightly different now and I’ve had numerous takes on this and I want to play this. I’m going to play a little video file here. And I want to see what people think, because a lot of people agreed with me on this, but some people didn’t. And it’s a group of girls, I believe, in Rotherham, of all places, being attacked by the police. So I’m going to play this.

 

[Start of clip]

Yo, yo, yo! What’s he doing? Yo, was he mad? Why is she squaring up to him? Yo, he’s got the baton!

 

Yo! What they doing?

 

[End of clip]

 

[54:27]

 

So this was during the rounds of the day and I’ve posted this. Now, I want to give my initial impression on this. So it’s clear there that these girls were getting mouthy and the girls are about 14 or 15. They look maybe a bit older. I think actually there might be around 16. And I say that because I’ve been told it’s a school leavers event, that they’ve done the GCSEs or they’ve got to the end of the year and it was a school prom or leavers event.

 

Now, I watched that twice. And I noticed two things. First was the girls may have been mouthy, but the police officer, the primary officer there, was the first person to make physical contact. He started pushing the girls. He then drew his baton and struck at least one girl with the baton. Several of the girls were bundled onto the floor and the officer that backed him up then drew a Taser and started pointing it at people.

 

Now, the first thing I’ve got to ask, or state, and this disgusted me because there was a number of people in my chat saying:

 

“The girls somehow deserved it because they weren’t dressed traditionally and they were being too mouthy to men in authority.”

 

And to people who think like that, if I met you in real life, I’d be a lot ruder to you than I would be on this stream, because I keep the stream pretty PG. But what I saw there was the police treating White girls in a way that they wouldn’t treat any other ethnic group.

 

Now, if they were black girls doing that, firstly, do you think the police would have started by throwing the first punch?

 

Secondly, do you think the police would have got the batons out?

 

Thirdly, do you think the girls would have been [word unclear] and would have been bundled over on the floor?

 

And finally, do you think a police officer would have dared to draw a Taser and threaten them? The answers are no, no, no, and no!

 

And finally, do you think the mainstream media would have ignored this case? If this had been black girls, this would have been the front page of every paper. It would have been on every news channel. Starmer’s final act as Prime Minister would have been to take the knee. And the country wouldn’t just be hot because it was unseasonally warm. Britain would be on fire right now if White police officers had done that to black girls. And I can’t understand why anybody who calls themselves a nationalist would turn around and say:

 

“Well, the police did the right thing, mate. They gave those rowdy girls a slap!”

 

If you think that basically F off! Simply, I don’t really want, … I don’t understand how we can be a hundred thousand girls deep into a Pakistani Muslim grooming scandal that the police covered up, and now we’re shilling for the police beating White girls!

 

David Clews: I agree, I agree, I agree!

 

I mean, look, the first thing I looked at is, you see these young girls, they’re young, should they be dressed like that? No, but they are. You know, that’s just at the end of the day we don’t have a morality police, yet. So it is what it is.

 

But again, when I see young girls dress like that or being like that and they’re drunk, they can get away with that in a homogenous society. Not now. And fathers, uncles, grandparents have a duty to speak to young girls and say:

 

“Look, girls, it’s not safe for you out there. There’s a lot of horrible, nasty people!”

 

But I agree entirely. The police were disgusting in that instance! They had no right to attack those girls the way they did. And it’s just utterly, utterly filthy!

 

But that is the police now, and that’s the way they are with Whites. And they behave like that and they’re disgusting! And it could have been de-escalated. But the cops never want to de-escalate that. I mean, they’re just thugs a lot of the time.

 

Mark Collett: And it’s not just that, David. Like, so, right, You’re a big guy. You’re a lot taller than me, aren’t you?

 

David Clews: Reasonably. I don’t know. What height are you?

 

Mark Collett: I’m 5’ 10. What are you?

 

David Clews: 6’ 1.

 

Mark Collett: So like if you squared up to me and you’d had a few beers and you started shouting in my face and I held both my palms out and pushed you back to create distance. I don’t think that would be an unfair response if somebody of your size was acting in a threatening way to somebody of my size after having a few beers. Now, if I saw a 15 or 16 year old girl in a mini dress out for a school leavers prom and she shouted something at me like:

 

“Oh! Aren’t you that old racist guy that used to be in the BNP?”

 

And I ran across the street and palmed her in the chest and knocked her flying, that’d be a ridiculous response because they’re girls. And I kind of, I’m not this sort of like White knight guy that thinks that women should never get their comeuppance if they’re acting horrendously.

 

But I don’t think I could go up to a girl like that and floor her for just being a little bit mouthy. I’d be like:

 

“Come on girls, calm it down a little bit. I know it’s a big night for you but you know there are sort of ways you’ve got to behave.”

 

But there was no de-escalation, was there? The police were so happy to beat White girls!

 

And I always remember the sight of those disgusting pigs down Westminster taking the knee for Black Lives Matter after George Fentanyl Floyd died.

 

And I think to myself:

 

“They’d take the knee for the blacks. But if it’s White girls enjoying a leavers prom, …”

 

I don’t care what the girls are wearing. Look, the problem is if these were outliers, if 90% of White girls were wearing your trad dresses and these were the outliers and they were behaving in a particularly awful way. I could maybe say:

 

“Well, maybe they did deserve being treated a little bit harsher.”

 

But this is, unfortunately it’s the norm now. Now those kind of dresses, those kind of things for working class British girls are the norm.

 

[1:01:08]

 

But again they’re dressing what they see on the television. I mean again they watch Love Island, they watch TikTok, that’s all. I mean again we could have them in nice long dresses and a nice crisp white shirt with an armband on within a few weeks if you control the mainstream media, if you control the methods of communication. [chuckling] But and a lot of the time it is just quite harmless. I understand where people are coming from, but I don’t think when they get dressed like that as well:

 

“I’m going to push back against the Patriarchy!”

 

What’s her name? Who’s that? Tommy Fury married to the girl. I can’t even remember her name. Annie May or whatever she is, she wears that.

 

Mark Collett: Molly-Mae Hague.

 

David Clews: Molly-Mae Hague wears that outfit. So I’m going like Molly-Mae Hague. That’s it! Just there’s a lot of shallowness out there.

 

And again though, it is still this one though, like this isn’t a famous thing. You know my critique of girls when they go out is getting excessively drunk and going to places where there is ethnic minorities and letting your guard down. That’s my critique. And men, and also fathers and families allowing that. Because again, let me give you an example. Or you know, in like Europe you have like nude spas and stuff like that. Are men out raping the girls there? No, of course not. Because it’s a high trust White society. What you wear and what you have on, … You imagine like naked girls around Africans, what they would be doing.

 

There was a video earlier like an African wanking himself off on the beach. These people have IQs of like 60 or 70! They’re like a dog on heat. And that’s what I think you need to get across to people is:

 

“Look, girls, you can’t be like that in this society with these animals. And you need to not let your guard down with them because they’re scum and they’ll take advantage of you!”

 

And that’s the only thing I think we should really be pushing at this time.

 

Mark Collett: Well, the other thing is I’ve got to say this as well. Those girls, I understand the:

 

“Oh, they’re wearing these dresses, it’s scandalous!”

 

But I’ll tell you something, they’re the kind of working class girls who will all have three kids by the age of 24!

 

David Clews: Yeah, true.

 

Mark Collett: I can tell you this now. I’ve seen a number of these kind of like more middle class, more traditional looking women and they’re the ones, one kid at most! Don’t knock those girls don’t knock White working class girls. I live in a very working class former mining area and there are working class women in my area that have got over 10 White children! Now they might not be able to articulate themselves as well as the middle class girls, but their genetics will carry on. [chuckling] That’s something that we need to talk about.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean one of the things as well, like I think, and it isn’t a conversation for today, but in the long term, I think the way in which men and women have been, … I mean I don’t actually think in general, I think men and women should be educated separately. I do believe that, …

 

Mark Collett: I was! I went to an all boys school.

 

[1:04:50]

 

David Clews: So did I think the sexes should be separated from a young age.

 

And I also do believe that boys should do boy things and ghetto should do ghetto things because they actually rub off badly on each other. Men become more feminised and women become more sexualised and masculinised when they’re around men. And that was the thing as well, even in the workplace as well. Just a culture of it. Feminism is clearly a policy that has been pushed. And the society in its true essence of itself is Patriarchal. And you do need to get back to that.

 

And again, you look at an incident like that, the police are scum, but these are wider symptoms of societal breakdown. And it was the same with the rape gangs as well, is that you have to talk about the way in which families broke down. The way in which again, if this would happen. Well, it did start happening. But if you think about 100 years ago, a foreigner came into an area and started bribing young girls. A group of lads, a group of men would have got together and they would have gone and they would have got them and they would have dealt with them. It just wouldn’t have happened! They wouldn’t have got away with it.

 

And the rape gangs have happened in that absence of masculinity that you don’t have men and you don’t have organised men in areas that are able to come together and fight. That’s the biggest problem we have is we are so atomized in our existences. There just, there isn’t that togetherness that we once had in areas.

 

Mark Collett: I completely agree! I completely agree! Now we are in the second half of the show now and we’re going to do the Superchats in a minute.

 

So if you want a Superchat, please do help me as much as you can. Please do consider making some kind of contribution to the show. It’d be very much appreciated. I would very much appreciate it. So if you can, please do help.

 

Now, there is one brief thing I wanted to talk about because people have been mentioning it in the chat and I was gonna schedule this. If the Starmer-Burnham thing hadn’t happened, I was gonna put a big picture of a crocodile on the thumbnail because there’s been a lot of people talking about the fact that a young boy was thrown in a crocodile pit at a zoo. And people in the chat are saying:

 

“Have we seen the perpetrator yet? Who was the perpetrator?”

 

Well, the BBC have revealed that he was White. Now, what the BBC have also revealed is that he’s heavily disabled, extremely strong, and was able to break away from his two carers, physically overpower people in the zoo, pick up a child and hurl this child into the crocodile pit. And you’ve also got to ask. I mean, I know this isn’t really somewhere where we go, but what a horrific thing to happen!

 

And this is all, again, down to liberalisation. Care in the community. Every single institution that existed to corral and institutionalise these dangerous, for want of a better word, retards has now been closed down. These people now live among us. There is this thing called “care in the community”. They go to the same schools as our children. And this isn’t an isolated thing. It wasn’t long ago. I can’t remember which particular art gallery it was.

 

David Clews: The Tate Modern, down in London. Another, he threw the kid off the, …

 

Mark Collett: Another retard picked up a kid and hurled him off the roof!

 

David Clews: It was a French kid.

 

Mark Collett: You’ve got these fully grown men that seem to have this unnatural strength, but they’ve got the brain, …

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: They’ve got the brain of a child and the impulse control of I don’t know, a drunken animal. And basically, this is incredibly dangerous! ! And I don’t know, I was talking to a few people about this and I was saying, it just seems like everything is sort of coming to a head from every level. And if you’ve got kids, it’s not just the Pakistani rape gangs, it’s not just your low IQ, African migrants who can’t control their urges. It’s also the fact that. [chuckling] Sorry, somebody in the chat has just said something so funny. Sorry, I couldn’t, … I’m usually gonna put in the chat. “Mongo strength”. That’s what they’ve said.

 

David Clews: But again, though, these people do have extraordinary, … The guy, see, if you actually look at the guy that did it. It was a guy called John Bravery was his name. And the guy has got a neck like a fucking wrestler! Like in the Mongol neck and he’s like, …

 

Mark Collett: He’s like Brock Lesnar, but with a tenth of the IQ and you’re in real trouble!

 

David Clews: But the thing is, as well, like, again, though, here is the thing now, if you saw a child like that and screaming there or anything, and he had a history of violent behaviour, this guy. He had a history of doing these things before, John Bravery. And it didn’t actually come as a shock, and he deliberately targeted that child. But, this is the thing. You’re constantly told that everyone is good at heart. That’s just not true! You should be racially profiling. You should be [chuckling] profiling everyone and trying to understand that. Someone makes a good point as well. Who were the carers?

 

So that’s the other thing is, as well. How many Africans do you see as the carer? And it’s some big fat African woman, and she’s on her fucking phone or she’s got a melon on her head. You know, that’s what all these carers are like now. There he is.

 

 

Mark Collett: I mean, his neck is as wide as his head! [chuckling] I mean, that’s not from training or steroids!

 

[1:11:06]

 

David Clews: He would kick the shit out of you and me with one hand at the same time!

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, he’d be eating his goyslop, one hand full of goyslop, gobbling away as he literally beat both of us down into the curb!

 

David Clews: But that’s the other thing is, as well. Like, you see with a lot of kids who have mental health problems, they give them so many sugary drinks. They give them utterly shite food! They have them on, like, iPads all the time. Honestly, it’s absolutely horrific! It is just a horrific culture. And again, it’s Africans!

 

I mean, that’s the thing. I hate seeing, like, these Africans out. And that’s such an awful thing! Mark, I’m just gonna go top up my milk, if that’s all right?

 

Mark Collett: You can do that. I mean, really, from my point of view as a dad, hearing about these things actually does scare me! And I’ve got to say somebody of that physical strength and development, you know, allowed to walk amongst children, allowed off the leash by his carers. I mean, it is terrifying!

 

And I just think if that was my son that had been yoinked up and hurled into the crocodile enclosure as some low IQ, one of a better word, retard, was howling and making guttural noises, thinking it was all a game, you know, who could you blame but you? You know what’s going to happen. You know what’s going to happen, don’t you?

 

The response to this won’t be that these people need to be sectioned or they need to be kept away from children. The response will be:

 

“Why weren’t the crocodiles in a glass enclosure? Why wasn’t the wall too high for the mong to hurl the child over? Why wasn’t there more adequate barricades?”

 

There’s not going to be a change, a positive change. Somehow safeguarding and the height of the walls at the zoo will be to blame.

 

And I’ve got to say I think there’s going to be more of this. I think this is a frightening development. This is a genuine political point. I think there’s going to be more of this as well. I think this is going to be another problem that’s going to get worse as this country slides into this dysgenic whirlpool of slop nonsense and ill breeding!

 

David Clews: Backs to the wall in the underground. See if I’m ever anywhere with my kids and it’s like the train or anything like that, stand next to the wall and keep them away. I’ve seen loads of videos, especially foreigners that just, … See the thing is its like we all have crazy thoughts. You know, I’m sure everyone listening to this, you have these daft thoughts about doing daft things. But they actually say that it comes from when we were hunter gatherers, you had these crazy thoughts so that you were always on alert in case like a bear ran out and tore you apart. So sometimes you have these crazy thoughts.

 

Low IQ people especially like low IQ Africans are Indians. They will act on that thought that comes into their head! And there’s been numerous instances of them pushing people onto train tracks, pushing them! This like never relax, never ever relax around blacks! You know, the phrase exists for a reason.

 

 

[1:14:47]

 

Mark Collett: Look, when I’m out with the kids and we’re out in a park, or a play place, or a soft play or something like that, and you see one of those big sort of like 14, 15 years old and he’s wearing a nappy and he’s wheeled in there by his two carers and he’s going wild on the soft play equipment near your sort of 15 month old and 6 year old! I’m the dad that’s like:

 

“We’re gonna have our snacks now or we’re going to the slide at the very other end of the play place because it is a worry.”

 

And the worst thing is when they come and start petting other children or touching other children. The social pressure now is to interact and let it go on and not say anything because if you say:

 

“I don’t want this strange, weird looking, you know much bigger and stronger kid touching my kid!”

 

You’re the bad guy because you’re not understanding it. It’s awful!

 

David Clews: Remember Emily Jones? Remember the wee girl, seven years old and she was out and she was on her scooter, some absolute lunatic. Let me try and remember her name. It was Albanian [word unclear] She was just a nut job. She was a psychopath. She nearly took the head off that wee girl. She’s scootering. She got a wee bit further away. This lunatic just appears and slits her throat and nearly takes her head off.

 

I mean, again, statistically, the chances of that happening, but you know, it’s just awful! Awful because there are a lot of nut jobs out there.

 

Mark Collett: There are. And I think it’s only going to get worse. I think that again, the societal pressure is clear. If you sidestep the migrant gang, if you sidestep the mad black guy shouting wildly in the street, if you tell your kids, don’t go near that big guy who’s making those really guttural weird roars as he punches the soft play equipment.

 

There is this pressure from these horrible liberal Whites:

 

“What are you doing? Why wouldn’t you let your kid go near John? What’s wrong with you? This is the rainbow play!”

 

And you’re like:

 

“What? No, no!”

 

You know, it’s like with these two horrible homosexuals. Jamie Varley and McGowan Zachary who murdered that wonderful baby, Preston Davy. And you’ve got people all over. I’m not on social media, but the wife told me, she said:

 

“That case is all over Instagram and all these influencers are saying, ‘Why are you saying that gays shouldn’t look after children?’”

 

Well, the first gay couple, the first, literally the very first as well, that were allowed to adopt in Britain, sexually abused their child! The first, not the second! Not one couple within the top 10, not a couple within the first hundred. Literally the first couple! The first couple that were hand picked to be the poster couple for adopting babies as a homosexual partnership chose a child so they could specifically abuse it. The first!

 

Anyway, let’s do the Superchats.

 

David Clews: Just a quick one on that. And it is so important everyone listening to this show. Look, we can’t provide you with a solution to these problems, okay? Because we’re not able to do that right now! But you are in control of yourself and you are in control of your families. And, just maybe thinking the worst is sometimes the best thing to do in these situations. Maybe just, you know what, cross to the other side of the fucking street! Like Irina Zatuska sitting on the train. And the next minute the animal, the Carmelo Anthony as well, the animal comes up and stabs! Just do what you need to do and think how you need to think. Just don’t put yourself in that situation and don’t be, please, naive.

 

And it’s the same with, if you’re dealing with the state or you’re dealing with the police, don’t think for a second, … Just always think the worst! And then if good things come out of it, then it’s a good place to be.

 

Mark Collett: And look, think of it like this. Imagine gambling your precious child’s life in order to make a liberal statement to others around you. Because that’s what it is! You are gambling the life of one of the most precious people to you in the world. The most precious if it’s an only child! And you’re gambling that to virtue signal to people around you that you will never see again. And that don’t mean anything to you know, imagine saying:

 

“Well, I didn’t pull my daughter back from the screaming black man on the train platform because I didn’t want the White London commuters to think I was racist. Now my daughter’s dead.”

 

And again, this goes back to the Burnham Badenoch, why Reform and Restore won’t win. It’s because Whites are this way programmed. White mothers would now rather virtue signal than priorit. Not all, but around 50% of White mums would rather virtue signal to people they don’t know, than they would ensure and prioritize the safety of their children. They would leave their children with a homosexual, with predatory homosexuals to prove to people on social media that they’re progressive and open minded! That’s how people are. Remember this, guys! And it’s people saying it’s women. It’s not just women. It’s men as well!

 

[1:21:01]

 

David Clews: Centrist dad. Centrist dads. There’s loads of centrist dads out there.

 

Mark Collett: You know, men are afflicted with this as much as women. I’ve made comments before and I’ve had men turn around and you’re like:

 

“You agree, right, mate? You can’t say that. What gives you the right to say that in a public place?”

 

David Clews: What?

 

Mark Collett: What are you talking to? But they will, they’ll. Men will square up to you over this in public.

 

David Clews: They will, they will. So just keep this, …

 

Mark Collett: There is a solution, David, and there’s only one solution. And it is that we get on the lifeboats and we separate ourselves from the toxic sludge that many Whites have become!

 

But look, we’ve got to do the Superchats because we’re running 20 minutes late. And look, I love running late on this show. It looks like I’m fully buttoned up, but I think there’s only about two buttons maintaining my modesty because I am sitting in a pool of, … I’ve got one of those cool pads. The wife bought me a cool pad and the cool pad is now about 32 degrees. It’s covered in sweat!

 

I mean, I would take T-shirt off, but it would be indecent.

 

And I’m not stripping for money. So there you go, guys.

 

Well, then again, maybe I would. Maybe for the right Superchat. If the Superchats total over a thousand dollars, I’ll take that. I’m only joking. I’m only joking.

 

Right, here are the Superchats and we’ve got an extreme, extremely generous Superchat to kick off with. It’s a guy called Nocasa Worries and he gave $300! Thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. He said:

 

“I always enjoy the “Mark was right” dance. Election analysis is our underrated stream. It takes guts to make big predictions publicly.”

 

Well, look, thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. That’s incredibly generous and thank you.

 

And also I want to say that I haven’t done the “I was right dance”. So I didn’t go too far. I wasn’t sort of I told you so too much. But thank you for pointing out it does take a lot. Look, I could have made very recently, I could have made a lot more money and a lot more social capital going to make a field, blogging it, shaking hands with everyone, having a picture with Rupert Lowe and riding the train. There was a lot of money to be made.

 

You know, the young Bobs of this world were out with their camera on a gimbal, monetizing every second of it. Every selfie that was there to be taken, every stunt to be partaken in, they were on board. I’m not that guy. If I think that something’s going to go wrong, I will say that and I’ll nail my colours to the mast! So thank you for such a generous, generous, Superchat.

 

But I’ve got to say this as well. Look, David’s the same. Me and David have both been hung out to dry over this. People were saying that we were clowns, we were talking rubbish! I had a guy and look, he’s a good guy. This guy’s a good guy. He’s in my chat, he supported me in the past and he was saying:

 

“What are you gonna say to me when Restore winning Makerfield?”

 

And it wasn’t. But we’re laughing. It wasn’t his fault.

 

David Clews: No!

 

Mark Collett: And I’ll tell you why it’s not his fault. Rupert was saying on the Saturday before:

 

“I honestly believe we’re gonna win this. People were built up to be knocked down.”

 

And I’ll tell you this, one of the most dangerous things you can do is predict victory on the eve of defeat. Because not only do you suffer the loss, but you suffer something far worse than a loss. Because a loss isn’t the end of the world.

 

[1:24:42]

 

David Clews: This is the point I tried to make. All these people who just went all in, I mean, they went all in. They basically, like think of it as a game of poker. They went all in on Restore. They’ve basically fucked themselves over! Because, see, when it all implodes, which it is going, … I mean, it’s even happening quicker than we, many of us thought.

 

And I don’t know if you saw yesterday, like Lotus Eaters did this Makerfield review and it was Benjamin sitting in a chair, it was a big leather thing and it was Charlie Downs and Connor Tomlinson. And I tweeted out about. I went pretty hard on it and then.

 

But the thing is, see, the comments, people were like genuinely, excuse my language, like:

 

“You fucking cunts! You were telling us they’re going to win that election and get 20% of the vote and they’re nowhere near it. And you’re sitting there and you’re just moaning!”

 

And this is what I actually said to people is:

 

“Look, see, if you go all in on this, you’re out there in the middle of the ocean on a life raft and there’s no one coming to rescue you. So just hedge your bet!”

 

Like that’s the sensible thing to do. Hedge your bet. Don’t get too taken in. And honestly, see the viciousness that Benjamin and these other people were getting. It was really ruthless because as I said, nobody likes to feel they’ve been conned. It’s that sinking feeling that you got.

 

And this is the other thing about emotions, the pendulum of an emotion. If you have a really intense emotion one way, which is joy and happiness, that emotion can then go the very far way. And it’s anger and rage! There’s no middle ground. And that’s what people are going to have towards all the influencers and everyone else who have, … I’ve really called this disgracefully wrong and used as an opportunity. That’s the thing as well. I see people now that the abuse that they’re getting and some of its pretty harsh, but they’re saying:

 

“You’re just up there and you’re getting your fucking photo taken and you’ve got your ‘buy me a coffee’ and everything.”

 

And again, I’m not against people. We ask for money on the Internet, but we do it from a position of reasonable honesty and principle. Like we’re not selling a turd wrapped in gold paper! Which is what these people are doing. If they’d have just played a bit more cool. And again I love my analogies. It’s like the ugly guy getting the stunner. It is! And you know what? We’re the ugly guys! The stunner, I mean, this is, in a political sense, the stunner shouldn’t be wanting anything to do with us. The only reason the stunner wants him to do with us is she wants something off of us. She wants her clout or she wants our money!

 

That’s what people need to realise that we are [chuckling] the scum of the Internet! You know, we are the dreaded far-Right! The dissidents! And frankly, we need to stay that way and remain pure from these people.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I want to say this as well. So Sagon, Carl Benjamin. I’m not saying. Well, I am. He’s thick! And the problem is he’s an idiot! 20% in a Parliamentary by-election would be huge for any party.

 

David Clews: Yep.

 

Mark Collett: But to predict that, when you’re up against Reform and you’re going in at what was looking like it was going to be a 45-45 split initially between Reform and Labour before Restore on the ballot paper is an idiotic thing! But this is because he’s never been in politics. The problem is, okay, and everyone says I’m a know it all, and I am.

 

But do you know the trick to being a know it all, David?

 

David Clews: Experience?

 

[1:29:00]

 

Mark Collett: No, you only ever! Yeah, you only ever talk about the things you know about!

 

So if you get me on a show and you ask me about nationalist politics, electoral strategy, Nintendo, how good giant cans of energy drink taste, maybe real life crime or American serial killers or things that I’ve taken an interest in, I will talk about them because I know about it, because it’s something I’m interested in. Or maybe if somebody invites me on a show and I’ve just watched a weird documentary on WWF Wrestling in the 90s or how Transformers dominated the toy market in the late 1980s, I’m like:

 

“Oh, that looks interesting. I’ll watch that.”

 

I might drop something in about something I’ve just watched. It’s because I know about it. But if you invited me on and started to talk to me about the economics of ballet during the 1800s, I wouldn’t say a word, because I don’t know anything about it.

 

And the problem with Carl is he talks about a lot of things that he knows nothing about, but he talks about it with an authoritative tone, as if these are like the big brain takes!

 

And I think the problem that he’s got is him and his gang of Lotus Eaters*. I didn’t even know what a lotus eater is, by the way! It’s the stupidest name for a podcast ever! You do better off calling yourself, you know, “four tits on a couch”. You know, it means nothing. It means nothing!

 

[* Lotus-Eater, in Greek mythology, one of a tribe encountered by the Greek hero Odysseus during his return to Ithaca from Troy, where the Greeks had been victorious in the Trojan War. Odysseus arrived in an unfamiliar land after a north wind had driven him and his men from Cape Malea (Homer, Odysee; Book IX). The local inhabitants, whose distinctive practice is indicated by their name, invited Odysseus’ scouts to eat of the mysterious plant. Those who did so were overcome by a blissful forgetfulness; they had to be dragged back to their ships and chained to the rowing-benches, or they would never have returned to their duties. Odysseus and his crew then sailed on to their next stop: The land of the Cyclopes, where they encountered Polyphemus. The 5th-century-BC historian Herodotus located the Lotus-Eaters on the Libyan coast. The ancient Greeks applied the name “Libya” generally to North Africa and the Tunisian island of Djerba is commonly identified as the land of the Lotus-Eaters. Alfred, Lord Tennyson brought the story to the modern world in his poem “The Lotos-Eaters” (1832). Source: https:// www.britannica.com/topic/Lotus-Eater]

 

But the fact is he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

 

David Clews: No!

 

Mark Collett: That doesn’t mean he doesn’t know what he’s talking about at anything. But if you’re going in to talk about a small specialist topic, whether that be as I said:

 

“How transformers took over the toy market in the 1980s.”

 

And people make documentaries on these things, or whether you’re talking about the rise of nationalism in the late 1970s, you’ve got to be an expert. You can’t just fire from the hip. And Sargon’s just like:

 

“This is our time. Rupert Lowe is the first politician to engage with me since I killed, …”

 

David Clews: Gerard Batton’s career.

 

Mark Collett: Gerard Batton’s career!:

 

“So I better double down and tell everyone he’s gonna win! And look I was at UTK and I’m on X and everyone retweets me!”

 

But he’s just realised that that’s not actually what makes you a winner.

 

Now, unfortunately for Sargon and for a lot of people, I am the only person in Britain that was heavily involved in the three biggest power winning nationalist campaigns in history, Barking and Dagenham. 2006, I did the leaflets, I did the reminders, I worked on the campaign, GLA 2008, I did the booklet insert, I did the additional leaflets, I handed the leaflets out. And European Parliament 2008, I did every bit of publicity for that campaign. No one else can say that!

 

So that’s like my thing! But no one will talk to me because I’m the bad guy. But because it’s my thing, I predicted it. Carl’s never done it. Carl’s never done it. And that’s why he’s come unstuck.

 

David Clews: No, no. And again, when they were doing their canvassing, they said they primarily knocked on doors that had a Reform poster on them. And see, because people went there and they travelled from all around the UK, they weren’t actually canvassing properly. They were engaging in, … That’s what Hopium does. Hopium says that, …

 

Mark Collett: Engaging in a big circle jerk of confirmation bias!

 

David Clews: Correct, Correct! And they got it completely wrong.

 

And what’s going to happen to them in this Manchester election? They’re going to get absolutely slaughtered! And if they get less than 5% in that, which is a distinct possibility, or they get maybe between 5 and 10%, a lot of people are just going to turn around and say:

 

“What is happening here? What have you sold us?”

 

Mark Collett: If Restore were to get under 5%, it would be seen as catastrophically bad, for two reasons.

 

Firstly, they have a sitting MP. And secondly, they have a million pound war chest.

 

David Clews: More than that they have four or five million quid! So they raised about four or five, plus, you don’t know how much Musk might have given them.

 

Mark Collett: No, exactly!

 

Well, look, we’ll move on from this. Point gave $25 and said:

 

“Donation.”

 

Thank you so much! Gassings Never Happened, gave $14. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Please, could David Showcase his talents and perform his lucky Larry Silverstein impression?”

 

David Clews: Well, [chuckling] yeah, you have to watch UNN for a Larry Silverstein impression, I’m afraid. That’s something that’s paywalled. I’m afraid on UNN to get a Lucky Larry. So it’s funny, I was thinking about Lucky Larry today. It just popped into my head. There’s an individual like that in the world. Just always makes me laugh, now cry as well.

 

But, yeah, he got very lucky, let’s just put it that way. [chuckling]

 

[Enter an IMAGE here]

 

[1:34:25]

 

Mark Collett: It Was Made Up gave $10. Thank you so much, and said:

 

“So how long do you give Burnham if he becomes PM? Can the country even be governed at this point? Seven leaders in a, seven prime ministers in a decade.”

 

Now you say, can it be governed? Of course it can. Labour have got a massive majority. They’ve got a larger mandate for ruling than the Conservatives ever did over their 14 year tenure. You have to remember that.

 

So it can absolutely be governed. And this slop that the Daily Mail pumps out that if you change leader, you have to call a general election. Well, the Tories didn’t call a general election every time they changed leader. You know, they had Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak. It was a disaster!

 

Now, I’ll say this. Fundamentally, we are in a situation now where things are looking pretty grim from our point of view. But from a Parliamentary point of view, Labour have this unbelievable majority and that gives them a mandate.

 

And what’s more, they have a mandate because the press have given them a mandate. The media have talked up Burnham as the liberator, the King, the man of the north, coming down to free the people. They can’t do that and then say:

 

“Oh, but you have to hold a general election, mate!”

 

And people saying:

 

“We need a general election!”

 

You might be sorry about that! Because with the momentum Labour has at the moment, with Burnham coming back, if there was a general election tomorrow, let me tell you how it would work out. Labour would win, possibly a similar majority, the Tories would see a slight comeback and Restore and Reform would cancel each other out. And the First Past the Post system would effectively ensure that Restore and Reform probably wouldn’t win more than 10 seats in total together. The SNP would easily win in Scotland, Plaid would win in Wales and the Greens would probably gain a few extra seats. And you’d actually see a situation that could be worse than what we’ve got now.

 

Because if Labour did slide, it wouldn’t slide to the point where it didn’t hold power. It would slide to the point where it was the dominant force in a far-Left coalition where the concessions wouldn’t be made to a Restore or Reform. The concessions would be made to Zach Polanski or Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I think it will depend on what happens once Burnham takes over. I think if they see a bit of a boost in the polls, I wouldn’t be surprised if he did call a general election. He might not. He can wait.

 

I mean, that’s the thing. There is no constitutional requirement of a general election till 2029. None at all! He can come in, he can do the three years, years. But I think if they get a sniff that the polls have reversed, … Because this is the other thing that people have to realise, a poll is meaningless!

 

The only thing that matters is how you vote on the day. And the problem is that is Reform have lost two by-elections that they had to win if they were going to be able to form a government in the next general election. They got routed in Gorton and Denton and routed in Makerfield as well. And like the swingometer required for Reform to take all these seats off Labour, it’s incredible what would need to happen in order to do that.

 

And the other thing that people underestimate again is you have a huge payroll vote in Britain that relies on the NHS, the public sector, the trade union movement. You also you’ve got loads of liberals, you’ve got a lot of very liberal areas. These people will come together to destroy Nigel Farage. I mean, they think Nigel Farage is a Nazi! They think Nigel Farages is far-Right.

 

So this is the other problem for us. We all know Farage isn’t. They think he’s the nemesis. And you might, you find that in civic society, … The other bellwether I use is, I use like the John Sopel, Emily Maitland test. Now they’re like North London jews, they hate Nigel Farage! They can’t stand anything Nigel Farage represents because they understand that that Farage could be a stepping stone to something more dangerous. He could end up being like a Hindenburg figure. So they and the media will go out of their way to destroy Farage. And you got a taste of that over the 5 million donation. They will pump that into all the TV screens if there is a general election.

 

Mark Collett: And look, I’ve got a slight disagreement with you on this, mate, only minor. I don’t think Gorton and Denton was too bad for Reform and I’ll tell you why. The king makers there were the Pakistani Muslims. And we know that when they come out and vote, I think that they were about 22% of the constituency. So we know they were gonna basically at a 50% turnout. If all of them turned out, they get 44% off the bat and you know how much that changes things.

 

But I think the Makerfield one was the breaking point and I’ll tell you why. They’d won every seat in Makerfield.

 

David Clews: That’s true, that’s true.

 

[1:40:24]

 

Mark Collett: And that was failing to win! Failing to win a place with a sizable motivated ethnic minority, you know, sectarian voting group is not the worst thing ever! Failing to win that is not the worst thing ever! Failing to win possibly the most ethnically homogeneous seat in the working class part of the northwest, that’s pretty grim!

 

But anyway, look, we’ve got to move on because we want to get these done before we all melt. Snazzy candidate gave $8. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Hi, David and Mark. We must remember invisibility of goodness. People always work hard to fight against a big evil. In this case, Keir Starmer, the public sighed relief. But ubiquity of the corrupt media disorganises them again.”

 

Well, thank you so much! The Resident Baker gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Evening, Mark and David. A Collett and Clews double header is always great. Very salient point about the current environment for our daughters. We shouldn’t have to live this.”

 

Well, we both echo that. Autism is Unstoppable gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Evening, Mark and David. I think one of the reasons relations between men and women have broken down in the last, 200 years is due to the lack of community preventing men and women from meeting naturally.”

 

David Clews: Yes, yes, yes!

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think there’s a lot of things. I think that’s true.

 

But I also think there’s feminism, there’s the divorce court and I think there’s a social pressure. At one point, like back in my parents day, having a divorce was so stigmatized it was unthinkable. Now having a divorce is what all the girls do when they want to reboot their lives because they think it’s trendy. You know, you have these people who’ve got three, four kids and they have a minor fallout over something and it’s “irreconcilable differences”. I think there’s a lot of reasons. But I do agree the normal natural community of going to the working men’s club on a Friday night for a dance and meeting somebody that going, has definitely hurt people.

 

David Clews: Yeah, it is. Internet dating, Tinder bars, all absolutely horrific! I always had really good relationships with ghettos I met at the gym. I always think the gym is the best place to meet women and I’ll tell you why. Because chances are they live geographically near you. Like long distance relationships really don’t work. I mean they sometimes do, but by and large you want to be seeing them.

 

Go to a gym and look, here’s a wee life hack. Go to yoga classes or go to things that are actually predominantly. There’s lots of women, you know, do your numbers. If you go to a class where there’s like 20 women and there’s only two guys and one of them is like a fag, you’ve got a much better chance, [chuckling] you know, than everyone else. And you know there are still good women out there. I mean, don’t be unsure about that there are still a lot of normal women out there and looking for nice guys. I always think go to the gym and meet them face to face. Online dating is just, it’s horrific because the problem is if she’s messaging you, there’s another hundred guys fucking liking her profile and ready to take you out.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, agreed mate, agreed. Greeny from Oz97 gave two. Thanks so much, and he said:

 

“A lot of my dad’s Boomer friends have been getting behind Tommy recently and after listening to yourself I know he’s not genuine. What’s the best straightforward way to explain his cuckery?”

 

Well, simply explain to them that he is behind multiculturalism, just not Islam. And fundamentally he was supporting the very Sikh community that have supported Henry Novak’s killer! You know, the people up on stage, the Sikhs up on stage at Unite the Kingdom that Tommy endorsed went on stream and said that:

 

“They would defecate on Henry Novak’s grave.”

 

That tells you that Tommy is pushing the wrong people. He’s not pro-White, he’s just anti-Islam. He’s totally up for multiculturalism as long as it doesn’t include Islam. I don’t know what you’ve got to add to that, mate, but I think supporting the people who supported Henry Novak’s killer is just, …

 

David Clews: The thing is with Tommy Robinson is pure slop. Like, why do people go and eat food at McDonald’s? They know it’s shite for them, but they still do it. Why do people order a Deliveroo? They know it’s shite, but they still do it. I think in these situations you can’t waterboard them like as much as you want to! [chuckling] So you want to give them a slap. You just need to probably sow a few seeds of doubt. I mean, one of the ones would be as well, I mean, Tommy Robinson’s been doing this for 15 years. Has he ever achieved anything? He’s always going on about Israel and did you see what they did?

 

My advice in these situations is just plant seeds. And then, because usually when you argue with someone, if you tell them they’re a sicko and it gets their backup. Like say to them:

 

“Yeah, well, it’s good, they’re actually waking up to what’s going wrong.”

 

[1:45:48]

 

But I’ve got my concerns about Tommy. Just plant a few seeds.

 

Mark Collett: And do it in a pleasant way. Don’t belittle them too much. Say:

 

“Oh, but have you heard this?”

 

Anyway. Hazelnut 3000, gave $10. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Thank you, Mark and David.”

 

Well, thank you to you. Baba2 gave $50. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Intentionally White communities, that’s our future. Thank you for not stripping. My community is very White, higher income and safe. No apologies. Thank you so much!”

 

Dodzy04 gave $5. Thank you very much and said:

 

“Top lads. Mark, could you sell joining PA from the Steel City mate? I’m on the fence.”

 

Look, join PA if you want. If you want to be part of a pro-White community that is a community, advocates for our rights and takes part in activism, join PA! If that’s not your bag, don’t join PA.

 

But look, there’s only one group in Britain that has consistently raised money, openly and transparently, then given away 100% of the money after payment processing fees to the families of political prisoners. That’s PA!

 

Now, the thing is that annoys me and this does annoy me. I’m not saying it annoys me with you specifically, but it does annoy me that people say:

 

“Why isn’t anyone backing the political prisoners?”

 

Well, we are and we’re giving their families money.

 

But when we do that, people then still don’t join. You know, if you want an advocacy group, join us. If you want a political party, go elsewhere. You know, there are lots of groups out there. But if advocacy and community building is your thing and specifically if helping the families of anti-White two tier justice is high on your agenda, there’s only PA that does that.

 

David Clews: I think if you’re a young White man, you do have to hang about with other White men. I’ve managed to get to a PA conference and it was good people. And if you’re meeting up locally, you want to be involved with people who you think like. Just don’t be ashamed of it. You are who you are. You have the worldview that you have. Just be with people that you can get on with and you’ll feel better for it. It’s a bit like hanging around with White people or people that are like you. It just natural. Just do what is natural.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed. Jez9999 gave a dollar. Thank you so much, and said:

 

“Sorry if this seems like a basic question but if Lowe hates ethno-nationalism, what’s the point of him? He wants people to integrate but so do Reform. Should we just vote Reform or ignore British politics altogether?”

 

Look, if you read my article, and it’s free on Substack, I’ve got a massive Substack now please go and read my latest article on why the Conservatives are worse than Labour and why they must be destroyed. It’s up there, it’s free, it’s linked in the chat. Please go and support my Substack. You don’t have to give me a financial contribution like many people ask for. It’s all free. But if you want to, that does help.

 

But my latest article it’s explains the only organisation to have ever defeated anti-immigration parties in the UK is the Conservatives. It’s never been the far-Left, it’s never been Hope Not Hate, it’s never been Labour, it’s always been Thatcher, Cameron, Johnson. The Conservative Party is the one that we have to destroy! And I’ll always say this, if there is a better way to beat the Conservatives, tell me. But at the moment the only party that has managed to effectively beat them is Reform. And nowRestore are causing a split that makes that less likely. I’m not endorsing Reform as an end, but I’m endorsing them as a wrecking ball that could be a means to an end. I’ve explained this to you personally, my friend, because I know who you are and we spend time together in the real world. But that’s the only way for forward.

 

[1:49:56]

 

David Clews: I keep saying that people say to me that I shill for Reform. There’s actually been, I was calling out Reform years ago, talking about their funding, talking about like Nick Candy and all these people, Zia Yosuf. But look, you have to be realistic if you believe in a political solution.

 

I mean, I don’t believe in a political solution, but if you do believe in your vote and you want to vote, they are the only show in town. The problem, what was happened now with Restore, they’ve poisoned the well. The well is poisoned! And with Burnham coming back and the full force of the media behind them like it’s bleak now! There is not really a vehicle now for us to attack either Labour or the Tories. And in some ways it will be good because there will be a purge and we will go back to our natural state of being dissidents against the system in its entirety.

 

So there are positives potentially here.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed. Greenie from Oz97 gave another five. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Would love to see you guys review Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia as a movie review? Some awesome British Empire history as an Aussie, it’s cool to see the motherland when it was at the peak of its might.”

 

Look, we’ve done a few of these. We’ve done Zulu and Zulu Dawn. I’d be happy to review these for you. No problem. We’re reviewing Citizen Vigilante on Sunday. Iggs 22 gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Mark and David. Prisoners cost around 800 pounds per week. Now thoughts on bringing back hard labour, certain agricultural jobs and digging trenches for power lines or whatever.”

 

Look, when it comes down to it, I was watching something the other day about a convicted child killer in Wakefield Prison and three people walked into his cell and stabbed him to death. And at first I was like:

 

“Well, why are people celebrating this?”

 

Surely, yeah, a child killer has been killed. But one of the guys that killed the child killer killed a 24 year old woman and he’s hidden her body and he’s refusing to tell her parents where the body’s hidden.

 

Yet people are now praising him online. Like, okay, the child killer might be marginally worse in the prison hierarchy, but killing a 24 old woman and not giving her parents the closure of being able to bury her remains is not far off. And I was thinking about this and thinking, well they’ve all got these full life tariffs. On one hand I do think it’s probably more of a punishment to keep them in jail for the rest of their lives.

 

But on the other hand some of them clearly enjoy being in jail! Form a community and you know, roll with it as if they’re heroes in there because they’re notorious. They’re stabbing people they don’t like. They going to the gym, they’re still out exercising, they don’t have to worry about paying the bills and keeping the heating on. I did think to myself, with all these people on full life tariffs, why not just take them out? Bit of scrub land, firing squad, it’s over and done with. It would save us an awful lot of money, hassle. And let’s face it, if you have murdered children, if you have abused babies, if you have murdered young women and hidden their bodies and refused to tell the parents, what real service do you give to society?

 

David Clews: I was just doing a wee look there about the what the number of prisoners are. They’re currently 86,000 people in prison in England and Wales.

 

Mark Collett: That’s bigger than the army!

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. That’s bigger.

 

David Clews: 34% are because of violence against someone. Sexual offence is 23%, drug offence is 13% theft 10 to 12% robbery 7% possession of weapons 7%, criminal damage, public order.

 

So it’s like on a statistical basis the amount of people in prison for murder is probably tiny, maybe like a few hundred people Max over it. Well it’ll be thousands over the years.

 

So the thing is as well there is a problem with habitual drug offenders and then see all the people that are in for violence, it’ll all be drinking, drug related violence as well. So these people, a lot of them, they are just a product of the culture of the system, which is goyslop! And [chuckling] which is liberalism.

 

And this is where I’m actually a wee bit different. Like I don’t go for the whole hang them and flog them. These are people who are probably victims of the system. Who if the system was better and say you had traditional industry like steel works or manufacturing, they probably wouldn’t have turned to life a crime and drugs. That’s where if we could get things together. But again if you kill a child, rape a child, rape someone, like those gays, they should just be taken into the public square and be burned to death. There is no rehabilitation for people that have done that.

 

But I do think there is a wider argument to be had about why men are doing that and if there is something that could be done to rehabilitate them and get them back on, rather than just shoving them in prison because then they meet fellow criminals. How many men have gone to prison and then their girlfriends left them or their wife’s left them and their life’s ruined after that and then they turn to more crime. There needs to be, I think there needs to be a fundamental analysis of how we can get people back living full, healthy, happy lives and not just the whole “they’re scum!” They’re just people that have gone the wrong way in life.

 

[1:55:57]

 

Mark Collett: Interesting perspective. I look, I think some people can be helped but I think your full life tariff people might as well just be, …

 

David Clews: Yeah they should. You just need to deal with them. A firing squad would be sufficient.

 

Mark Collett: DodZ04 gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Another five for the solid answer about joining PA mate. Will join over the weekend.”

 

Well thank you so much! Would be good to see you at events. And Hedgehogs 82 gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Mark, why did you fall out with Alec Yerbury?”

 

We’re not getting back into Alec Yerbury! [David laughing] If it’s anyone’s fault, it’s David’s because David arranged a debate and the debate was more than humiliating for Alec, and ever since then he has probably rightfully so hated me with all his might, with all his little might.

 

But it’s basically I don’t hate the guy, I just think he’s a clown because he’s wasting his own time and everyone else’s.

 

David Clews: You know I think deep down Alex still really likes you and has a lot of respect for you deep down, and he won’t admit that but I think he still does. I like Alec. And I mean I know a lot of people don’t. But his analysis of the problems are correct but his solution is wrong as well. And clearly the NRP are providing a genuine third party and there’s good people involved in it but you know, will it go? I mean Alec thinks it’s going to take power. I disagree with that, I disagree with Alex analysis. But I think again he is a character. But I think he likes you deep down, Mark! And I think he probably feels bad about falling out with you.

 

Mark Collett: Maybe. Maybe. Look, like one thing about Alec that I’ve got to say, that really kind of disappoints me.

 

But it’s a disappointment with the movement. It’s a disappointment with the movement. And it’s that fundamentally we have a situation where people want to reinvent the wheel.

 

And I think one of Alex’s biggest problem problems is he thinks that if he comes into nationalism and tries to work it out all for himself and provide the answers, ultimately he’s going to do that, which he isn’t. And that’s not to be nasty. No one is. Nationalism has a long and complicated history.

 

And if you decide that you’re going to try and redo it all yourself and learn it all yourself and reinterpret it all yourself, you’re probably gonna come unstuck, which he has. I remember sitting at a meeting with him once, all around the big table, and he gave a very impassioned speech. And I’m gonna give him that. It was a very impassioned speech. He said:

 

“Look, we’re gonna do something no one’s ever done before. We’re gonna go to town after town, city after city. We’re gonna take a hundred men the first week, and a month down the line, it’ll be 300 men, and the public will see us. We will march through these places and our name will spread and we will grow. And we will build a large, dynamic political movement! And no one’s ever done this before. We are going to march and grow, he said, and I’m not going to have anything to do with any of you. I’m going to prove you’re wrong!”

 

And he collected his things and he stormed out of that meeting. And everyone looked at each other very uncomfortably. And a guy who was sat there, who was older than me and has been involved in this longer than me, turned to everyone and broke the silence by saying:

 

“Did he just describe the 1970s National Front March and Grow strategy?”

 

And everyone burst into laughter! Because his grand scheme had been tried and failed. And this is where if you’re gonna do something, do something new!

 

Now, no one has done what PA did, which is to be a community advocacy group.

 

Now, the Left have always had them, but the Right haven’t. Everyone’s tried March and Grow. Everyone’s tried another political party, and it’s why we do things differently.

 

But he didn’t want to accept that. And I think he’s gonna have to go through every phase of nationalism before he comes to the conclusion that they all were tried and failed for different reasons. And it’s sad.

 

[2:00:33]

 

David Clews: I would have had more respect for him if it was a Godfather 3 style situation. Remember when Joey Zaza, remember they have a meeting of all the, …

 

Mark Collett: I’ve never seen it. I’ve not seen number three.

 

David Clews: So that Joey Zaza comes in and he falls out with Michael and he leaves. The next thing, a helicopter appears with a machine gun and everybody gets shot.

 

I mean, if Yerbury was really serious, that’s what would have happened. All the nationalists would have been taken out at that point. He would have reigned supreme! [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: Gosh, that’s a grim thought, isn’t it, that he could have taken care of business. Green from Oz97 gave another $2. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“I felt embarrassed seeing Keir’s resignation speech. Seeing a leader of a Western nation crying publicly on TV’s weak, gay and retarded!”

 

And there is something to be said for Western stoicism. Control your emotions, channel them and use them as a power source. Never let your emotions become your master! There’s a good bit of advice from Marky C.

 

And finally, Baba2 gave a $20 donation. Very generous tonight. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“That’s for you to buy some raw milk to keep up with David. Really, I just love supporting you and your work.”

 

Thank you so much! I’m on the Jersey Gold Top. I love that plug of cream that you get when you pop it open. Can’t get enough of it and I’m forcing it among the kids every morning at breakfast time. Here’s to a stronger next generation.

 

But that brings us to the end of the show. It’s been sticky, it’s been hot, but it’s been very good. We are in the very top tier of streams on Rumble tonight. David, I’ve been watching it as we’ve gone on and where it shows Rumble live. I don’t know if you’ve seen, but we’ve been beating out some much bigger names and it’s largely thanks to you.

 

So thank you so much for that. I’ve got to say, you brought the fire tonight. And yeah, we’re in the, if you look at it, I think we’re 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. We’re in the top 20 streams on the whole of Rumble! We easily beat out George Galloway tonight, almost doubling his numbers. Beat Tim Pool. Beats plenty of big names, in fact. And we’re even closing in on Dr. Disrespect. So a good night all in.

 

So thank you for being here, David. Thank you for making such a good stream. Have the last word before we go and jump in the shower. Individually, not together. We’re not getting into the shower together!

 

David Clews: Vibes. [chuckling] Yeah, well, it’s just nice to see a lot of UNNers there in the chat as well. And Joey’s up. Joey always does this. Joey seems to know when the show is coming to an end, don’t you, Joey? I don’t know. Why is that switched to my background there? Did I just do that?

 

Mark Collett: We’ve not showering together, are we, David?

 

David Clews: No, we’re in the UNN. We’re actually together in the UNN studios.

 

Mark Collett: So I just did that as a joke. Because I made it as a joke.

 

David Clews: We’re together. Sorry, Wait, Joey, come here. Look, come here. Let everyone see you. Look. [his dog] So this is Joey. Joey, come on, show everyone. There he is. Don’t even see his wee head popping and you won’t be able to see it. There he’s at the bottom. He always seems to know when the show is coming to an end and he wants us out to the bathroom.

 

Brilliant numbers. Great to see the UNNers over and thanks to everyone that donated to Mark as well and keep us going because it all adds up. We’ve not got snake oil to sell you and we just want to keep doing what we’re doing because I think there is a gap. Again, there is actually a gap in the market for a wee bit of honesty. And I said after the Covid scam to people:

 

“Look, I’m not going to bullshit you. I’m going to be as honest as I can.”

 

And I think we’ve done that and people want to hear that. And I think the clear thing is look out for yourself like people.

 

That’s not to say you go and become a selfish narcissist, but look out for yourself and look out for your families. And be with people of a like mind and take positive steps, you know, do self improvement and do these things and we’ll all get better. Won’t we, Joey? We’re gonna go a walk. People call him “Jewy” because he tries to get me to stop my shows. [chuckling] Right, cheers, everyone.

 

Mark Collett: It has been a great show tonight and great numbers. I just want to thank Dave for being here. I want to thank everybody who donated so generously. I want to thank everyone who’s live in the chat. Amazing numbers across all platforms. Across all platforms. Over 700 people! So thank you so much!

 

And I want to say go and check out my Substack. It’s all free. Go and have a look over there. It’s really good!

 

I’ll be back on Friday for a stream. I’ll be back on Sunday for a review of Citizen Vigilante.

 

And again, just a huge thank you to David. Thank you to everyone who donated so generously. Thank you to everyone who tuned in. You know, I love you all. Thank you. I’m pleased you survived this show and I’m pleased we didn’t melt.

 

And I’ll be back next week for another episode of Patriotic Weekly Review. Thank you. I love you all. Stay strong. Keep fighting. Good night.

 

[2:05:46]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2026 = 198)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
You can now subscribe to me and support my work on SubStack:
https://markacollett.substack.com/

3
0
Green
3 days ago
David is always such a great guest. Cheers, and a big thank-you to both of you gents.

8
1
0KT0BER
3 days ago
“I have no problem with multi-culturalism as long as they integrate.” Tommy Robinson. oh no sorry I meant Rupert lowest

4
1
Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Later good people o/ 14

3
1
Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Sargon smugly chuckling as he grifts you with talking points from a decade ago.

3
0
makersnameplate
1 day ago
Lotus eater =
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus-eaters

1
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Figuratively, ‘lotus-eaters’ denotes “people who spend their time indulging in pleasure and luxury rather than dealing with practical concerns”.

1
1
Mr
2 days ago
Only Nationalists care about their countries. The rest of the globalist anywhere types treat our countries like they are “the commons” and will strip it bare.

1
0
Mr
2 days ago
Multicultural is not the same as multiracial. Multicultural is by definition NOT integrated. Someone please tell Rupert.

1
0
Cone of Silence
2 days ago
Freinds indeed

1
0
Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Thanks for the show, David is always a great guest.

1
0
MilosM.
3 days ago
But Mark, he will become the Britain’s first unelected PM.

0
1
Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
Who will? I can offer you John Major, Gordon Brown, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, and that’s off the top of my head.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Death penalty for the worst crimes.

1
0
Luther Sloan
3 days ago
I don’t think we should imprison people at all. Either fines, flogging, forced labor or execution.

1
0
Hide replies
Green
3 days ago
Here, here.

1
0
MilosM.
3 days ago
Public hanging for the creeps.

1
0
MilosM.
3 days ago
No fault divorce should be banned

1
0

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
the bible says the devil sowed tares in among the wheat

1
0
Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
Mongo

1
0
Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
o/ Christ refused to sit and eat with tax collectors and Toll’s men

1
0
Prison Ships
3 days ago

@ CriticalThinker2026 Anti•Satanism is unstoppable.

1
0
pa
2 days ago
this will have to be my last watch of PWR im afraid as i think those lasses deserved what they got from the police , and of course any donations go with me

0
2
Hide replies
Achille Fontanelli
1 day ago
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

makersnameplate
1 day ago
Sure, they were misbehaving, but it’s all about proportionality.
If you think the police acted proportionately and reasonably, then there’s no then I can’t help you.
They were being a bit mouthy, not violent, and they are young girls , not beefed up blokes.

Kevin
5 hours ago
It is discrediting to yourself to have this complete moron and conspiracy theorist on. He is dumber than Patriart who thought to moon landings didn’t happen

makersnameplate
1 day ago
Candygram for Mungo. Mungo like candy.

Just stuff
1 day ago
Some manner of a far left-right alliance indeed appears as the only way forward at this point. I fact, almost anything which brings about the collapse of the system works and then we attempt to fish in the muddy waters when it does. Like them commies in Russia and China and elsewhere did. Sure, I know that this is not what Uncle taught us, but he effectively lived in a post-collapse environment. Much like that of Russia post the spring 1917 Revolution – not even the 1905 one.

Just stuff
1 day ago
The pigs – there is something really systemically wrong with them. They have too much of an engrained feeling of invincibility/impunity over their actions. I think it is a more general thing… not like these pigs wake up in the morning thinking “oh, what a fine day it is today to kick and oppress some whitey!”.

Just stuff
1 day ago
Why not push for total Abolition and the review of old property structures and laws that entrench the elites. I mean, e.g. so many live (and work) in leasehold properties. Why not check out who is the freeholder there owning it all and how that came to be?

@filled_soda
2 days ago
David is unfathomably based.

@popovacianen
2 days ago
ffs mark buy an ac im from croatia we all have those there aint no way english cant have one

Hide replies

@UKrobm
1 day ago
we can have AC in the UK but we also have what is possibly, probably, the most expensive electricity in the world, so AC is very expensive for us.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
crap catbox doesnt work

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.
ooh. Only Alek I do know

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Yerbury.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 who is Alek?

MilosM.
3 days ago
David should arrange another debate between Mark and Alek.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 He will. Or worse people realize how much he stole and hollowed out the country when he is out of power and moved to another country.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
its probably about 50% crime related to drugs and 50% genetically predisposed to crime

@Philip.Kollberg
3 days ago
Amen

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
Some people should be tortured every day

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
Scotland’s just spent one billion pounds building a new prison

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Eh yeah but you never where his prime minister tenure would be after 4 years. If he sells Hungary and makes it even in worse state than under Orban, then that’s very bad indeed.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Bridge on River Kwai is pretty great

MilosM.
3 days ago
But Restore’s results are not actively undermining the Conservative demise. The best and most likely outcome is Labour and Conservatives eventually eating each other out.

Hide replies

@Germanicus
2 days ago
While it’d be hilarious to see the century-old political duopoly collapse in countries like the UK and US, people should realise, it doesn’t actually mean the elites have neen replaced or realigned (which is the only real mechanism of political change)

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
One of them was missing an eye

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Lawrence of Arabia is pretty good.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
Both made by the great David Lean

MilosM.
3 days ago
So far, the best option is to support the best one atm

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 No I can judge him already. He is a traitor. If he wasn’t he wouldn’t be in power. Jews would kill anyone taking power that would endanger jewish power and influence.

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Shills can’t alienate their audience completely, which is why they will do those things, especially if it is just signaling that can be disavowed.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Unfortunately, there won’t ever be a viable political leader or a leader of a nationalist group who would be given some massive, mainstream platform to say all the right things. Some compromises will have to be made.

MilosM.
3 days ago
And once Tommy stood behind Sam Melia when the latter got arrested. But he wasn’t that of a shill then much.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Yes sadly though the new is still pretty early to be judged. And Orban indeed did some based things.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 things like removing lgb flags are a brave thing because of the gov and it shows defiance but in the end the gov is the one that needs to be removed not just the flags. And Orban is the same as the new shabbos goy.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 I rarely use telegram Lord Bebo has a large twitter account. So I mostly see it on twitter.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 idk but if you have Telegram, I saw it on Lord Bebo channel

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
Lánchíd

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 Nop I did see that they put the Lgb flags up on the Lanchid.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Carl is classical liberal who is pretty shy of questioning mainstream politics.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Ah cool. Hey have you seen that some folks in Budapest hung Hungarian flags in place where lgbt flags, I believe on a bridge?

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
https://i.postimg.cc/kgmndh25/Uluru-Astro-Tour.jpg

EmptyLife
3 days ago
It’s an even stupider name when you do know what it means.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 no In real life it is even more beautiful. I have seen it myself. It’s very different in real life. You have to do it at least once in your life. I have been camping in the bushland near Alice springs.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 It’s the most beautiful country in the world. Wit real wild life. I had wild Cassowarys come up to me. Had dove with fish bigger than me and had seen sea snakes with the rings in real life.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Very nice but is the photo legit?

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 More like embarrassing himself.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
The Merchant of Swindon will get his pound of flesh regardless

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.
This image does no justice to how beautiful is this in real life.
https://i.postimg.cc/GmhkzzbT/468419420-10160535857772671-4749960011641070774-n.jpg

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
hes a lot more switched on than i was at 16

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
hes only 16 and he got quite badly beaten up the other day for doing public debates

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Have you traveled there? idk, desert sounds as pretty messed up place to me. Especially after watching some Ozzie mad pig killer film

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
i think people are being a bit harsh on young bob

0KT0BER
3 days ago
David’s been great holding out on X on the restore ziobots.

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
black shirt

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 Dudee!You have to go to Australia at least once. The desert sky is the most beautiful thing you will ever see. You can see galaxies.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Sick scumbags.

@Philip.Kollberg
3 days ago
why does Mark always wear black?

Hide replies
makersnameplate
1 day ago
Have a guess.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
A lot of parents have transsed their kids

New124
3 days ago
BTw it isnt even safe just out on the streets of britain nowadays. Be careful out there people. its now Riot Season, previously known as Summer.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 This one guy won some boxing event. I would rather not travel to Australia. Expensive trip that goes for too long.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/2069847230928785432

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
or they used to they are not allowed to associate.

ChuckGerety
3 days ago
They are risking lives just so they get their feel good giddies

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 They should invite you to one of the punchups. They do MMA matches constantly. maybe kickboxing as well.

New124
3 days ago
Jonty

MilosM.
3 days ago
Bears are less dangerous than some people.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Hahahaha, I already did to one of them.But we are friendly to one another so harsh feelings.

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
Unbelievable!

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
I was watching a documentary from the 70s inside strangeways. It is safer in there in the 70s than out here in 2026

New124
3 days ago
this is your brain on Leftism. they think everyoens the same. different races, even disableds.

ChuckGerety
3 days ago
Society must accept that there’s some who are unfit for civilized society

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Even in a proper humongous society you would still have anti-socials, but they would either be put into a work camp or an institution if they are too far gone.

ChuckGerety
3 days ago
A guy like that needs to have a shock collar

@WASP_Supremacist
3 days ago
Police are coming to kill Mark because he said “retard” and his gues keeps saying “low IQ Africans.” RIP

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.
hahaha. Better not the NSN guys hear that! :joy:

New124
3 days ago

@MarkCollett:6 Mark, they also have a policy of rehousing these mental cases in rural areas. The Scottish islands are now honestly like ¼ loony bin. they think itd better for them etc and it actually just drags these sm all communities down. the carers are all grifter losers too

ChuckGerety
3 days ago
He looks dangerously unevolved

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 I thought that’s insult for Australians lol

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/2069847230928785432

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
there are a lot of devils at heart

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago
crap

MilosM.
3 days ago

@Kultur_Rebell
You’d be in more luck to try kebab instead.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Girls and women, but especially girls, are wired to buy into feminist bs and that’s not only okay but as something to act and dress like men. I never understood the appeal of tomboys.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
autist threw a kid off

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
tate gallery

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
they closed the mental institutions in the eighties and said wed have to live with them instead

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
I don’t I just want you to shut up

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
It was a 20 foot drop too apparently

MilosM.
3 days ago

@Kultur_Rebell
Why do you want kebab?

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 I don’t think so. it would make plenty of white nattionalists zog influenced
also Rupert says nothing malicious in that clip.

New124
3 days ago
gotta say tho i feel sorry for parents of daughters. esp the fathers. No thanks.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
It would have been called a pogrom back then

Luther Sloan
3 days ago

@New124:3 Exactly.

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
I’m English. Onion and garlic sauce please.

New124
3 days ago
it was in ROTHERHAM too! the cops have let down the poor girls of rotherham before!

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 Flat Earth originates with the judaic view of the world, the Talmud specifically

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
Are you a Tommy tard?

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@Kultur_Rebell
they make kebab from horrible offal in the UK

MilosM.
3 days ago

@Kultur_Rebell
you a muslim?

New124
3 days ago
Lets not get hung up on the dress choise. it is the height of summer as well btw. f
the police are evil.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/2069847230928785432

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 And you would believe in that Earth is flat if someone shows you the picture that Earth is flat.

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
Shut it and make me a kebab

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 you’re as thick as pigshit

MilosM.
3 days ago

@Kultur_Rebell
Rupert and Nigel? definitely not. Though Nigel is in his own category of politician.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 No I won’t because I saw enough of his bs to call it a bs in advance.

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@MilosM.
heres another
https://xcancel.com/SB_B99/status/2069778242790162667

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
So? Both ZOG cretins

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 David talks a lot on Rupert and Nigel without some empirical evidence to back up his criticisms if them.

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 watch the clip shitstain

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
So?

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Indeed

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
it was the police that escalated it

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
Pathetic coward pigs. Little men.

0KT0BER
3 days ago

@MilosM.
David (UNN) has just posted another clip, but this one says it all
https://xcancel.com/FSnype_gore/status/2069128179046842534

MilosM.
3 days ago
Girls were tw*ts here. But political consequences of this is something else.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
the police treated it like it was a violent confrontation when it was just school girls

MilosM.
3 days ago

@0KT0BER:9 How? They are doing quite well. For a minor political party.

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
It is a handful of unruly girls, the police should be able to control the situation just by being there, but that is not how those officers see themselves or the girls for that matter.

MilosM.
3 days ago
Wait, girls didn’t mess up? I thought this is on them.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
There was a recent video in Scotland of the police arresting a black guy who was resisting arrest by kicking and spitting on them and the police were dealing with the thing in the most gentle way

0KT0BER
3 days ago
Milos rupert and restore are a complete bust

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@MilosM.:9 Zdravo gospodine!

MilosM.
3 days ago
I heard that Rupert’s views
on X are not his own actually

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/2069847230928785432

MilosM.
3 days ago
Rupert did indeed espouse some white supremacist views

0KT0BER
3 days ago
brave thin blue line

Karvakake
3 days ago
holy f

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
It is basically the Trump playbook, using the online radicals who are eager to embrace anyone who signals a little bit like them.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
he might have a lot of positions that coincide with ours, but he doesnt see those as ethnat positions, just common sense positions

MilosM.
3 days ago
Multicultural society btw can be a totally European.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
Rupert Lowe thinks Javier Milei has been terrific for Argentina…

MilosM.
3 days ago

@SvenLongshanks:9 He definitely has to. He doesn’t want to rock too many boats.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
i havent seen him contradict himself, hes just diplomatic with his wording on big interviews

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
he says people who dont speak english will be deported and if you dont work, you will be removed from council housing and that is the same as saying if people dont integrate, they shouldnt be here

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
And the important thing is, those who like this online personality will keep supporting him even as he disavows them.

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
i think rupert has to be careful with his wording

@Bobbie
3 days ago
Restore is done.

Karvakake
3 days ago
Does UNN stream anywhere else than Rumble? I used to watch them on dlive

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
The “left” isn’t getting what it wants either, they marry unpopular stances with the good things.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@LutherSloan:2 Socialism is for fools

0KT0BER
3 days ago
up a khyber

@Theos19
3 days ago
most people are simple and easy to control by propaganda and narrative. We do not have control of the narrative, we will never rule until we do.

MilosM.
3 days ago

@utopia148800:6 Szia bro

Karvakake
3 days ago
hello o/

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Nationalism goes hand in hand with Socialism.

New124
3 days ago
hope that UNN studio is air conditioned David

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
What does Restore and Reform offer people other than their mealy mouth stance on mass-migration?

Eldergoduk
3 days ago

@utopia148800
Only my basic tax :smile_1:

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

@Eldergoduk:6 Hello taxpayer!

Eldergoduk
3 days ago
Evening citizens

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
It is why they would much prefer to keep up the charade and just use soft power, but that is no longer possible.

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
It’s like that socialite who said if you’re not named in the Epstein Files then you’re a loser

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
Look at Egypt and other zogged up ME countries, they control their populations through hard power. It works, but it is a whole lot more unstable on a long enough timeline.

Criticalthinker2026
3 days ago

@VesselofGrace:b cheers mate

@noreplacement
3 days ago
Like Uncle strolling into Austria

Criticalthinker2026
3 days ago

@VesselofGrace:b I’ve had that for decades…i got a 666 tattooed on me chest

Prison Ships
3 days ago
Digital id is the brand of TheBeastSystem.

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
The reality of the worsening conditions hasn’t changed, so it will be hard to keep this going.

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
It is 100% a hoax based on an inversion of basic reality. Like everything else they do.

Secure the future of our people
3 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/2069847230928785432

0KT0BER
3 days ago
roman vineyards at York too

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
Rivers full of plastic bottles

Kultur_Rebell
3 days ago
Clewsy I wish you would use this platform and not crappy Rumble

MilosM.
3 days ago
Greetings all

@theicebergmelts
3 days ago
A few months later a Malaysian Airlines was shot down flying over Ukraine

Obscure Truth
3 days ago
I think they found the tail of the plane if I’m not mistaken.

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
I remember that one, quite odd, but the ocean is a big place.

0KT0BER
3 days ago
they’re adding a good 4-5 degrees to the temp on the most trusted news

Illustr8r
3 days ago
Also on Odysee

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
o/

@SvenLongshanks
3 days ago
hello everyone

Luther Sloan
3 days ago
‘ello

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Germar Rudolf: Thank you. I need to get my instruments ready here. Now they fall apart. There was a cap to it and somehow that fell off. I apologize for this. All right.

 

I have something positive to say about this country to just attach right to the speech you just heard. And that is the fact that we can do what we do right now in this country. Because in many countries where our ancestors came from, we would not be able to do this! So there’s freedom of speech and freedom of assembly in this country. So there’s something good to say.

 

Also, what I wanted to mention is when it comes to the war against Iran, the Iranians are an Indo-European people. The language is closer to English and German than it is to Arabic. And when we should talk about the victims that this war causes, we should talk about the thousands and thousands of people of Indo-Europeans of Iranian ancestry that are being murdered.

 

Now, my topic today, as you would probably guess, is on Holocaust, because that’s what I’m known for and that’s what I’m good at. Before I do it, I give a little bit of an introduction of who I am. I would assume most of you know, but probably not all.

 

I am a German citizen. I grew up, born in the mid-1960s, grew up in West Germany, had a normal lower middle class upbringing, went to a normal public school, eventually studied chemistry, graduated. And in the process of graduating, I stumbled over that topic, research that had been done here in the United States by an expert in execution technologies who was looking into the gas chamber question and had some chemical arguments which caught my attention. And as a chemist, I couldn’t look away down the rabbit hole I went and never came back.

 

Now, the persecution that has resulted from my activity, because Germany is not a country where free speech and freedom of science, freedom of assembly has led me ultimately to this country. And there’s another good thing. The government has tried hard to keep me out. They actually arrested me. I was married to a US citizen. I had a granted immigrant visa. They arrested and deported me anyhow, with the reason given “no criminal case”. So in violation of that, I ended up in Germany. And Germany, I was put on trial for the research that I had published over the past five years while in exile. And they sentenced me to 44 months in total. And I had to spend that time.

 

Now, I’m not a singular case and I’m not the worst case of what’s going on in Europe.

 

Anyway. I fought my way back. I won in court. What they’d done to me was wrong. It was remedied as much as you can remedy losing five years of your life in prison. Was reunited with my family and I got the status of a permanent legal resident now in this country.

 

So 35 years of research on that topic have a number of years ago raised the question to me, how do I get the message out to the masses? The first 30 years, I would say I was looking for answers myself. I wasn’t sure whether I understood everything and whether I really got this story straight.

 

And then at the end of the 30 year mark, I was pretty sure. And then the idea came up of how do I get the message out now? One way is of course writing something that makes the information accessible. A lot of you actually bought it today from me. So I wrote an encyclopedia because that’s what scholars do all the time.

 

Actually, no, they don’t!

 

But I was in the unique situation that I had this knowledge. 35 years of sitting at the helm at the core of this skeptical, scrutinizing research. And I decided it needs to be done. And in lack of support from others and due to a cataclysmic development in my private life, I had the time to do it and I pulled it off.

 

So we have the knowledge published, we have it concisely presented and made accessible. There is still a step of how do I get people to listen? Because we’re talking about a taboo topic and people don’t want to hear it.

 

You, most of you probably are open minded. Some of you are, almost many I don’t know are convinced already that the mainstream narrative is phony. But we want to reach those who sit on the fence or even on the other side of it. How do we do that? And I want to give you a little bit of a instruction by example of the best approach.

 

[05:23]

 

 

And the best approach you already have seen. Some of you coming by our book stand there seeing those signs here and marveling over these graphics and the information that’s on there.

 

The best approach for the normies into this topic is not talking about lies that they’ve made up like jewish soap. They all have admitted it didn’t happen or lampshades or what. No! What you want to talk to them about is massive violation of civil rights! It’s free speech, is freedom of assembly that doesn’t exist over there. And make them see in concrete examples what that means!

 

When we’re talking about this topic here, people need to realize, every person needs to realize that every historian on this planet to one degree or another, if he wants to write Holocaust historiography or talk about it or write about it, he is doing history at gunpoint.!

 

That’s the only topic in the world right now, more or less on a global scale, where historians are threatened with at least destruction of their career, if not outright prosecution and imprisonment.

 

 

Scholars, not just historians, scholars you can do physics, you can do psychology, you can do any science and you will not get in trouble if you say something that’s controversial. It’s only this one! This particular part in history that gets people in trouble! Even in this country we have free speech. But any historian who touches that is a third rail topic, he will find his career ended.

 

 

This is the map of Europe. You see in red the countries that have outlawed Holocaust skepticism, that have outlawed doubt! Doubt is the core feature of us human beings, that sets us apart from animals who cannot doubt their central input. We can doubt what we see. We can systematically look for the truth and communicate with our fellow humans what the truth is or what we think the truth is, and can even make it independent of ourselves by putting it down encoded so that everyone can see it. That is what sets us apart!

 

And a government that outlaws doubt, outlaws search for truth, outlaws communicating the truth with others, is outlawing humanity! These countries have outlawed humanity! Stalinist Russia, as bad as it was, had no laws that would proscribe the result of any scholarly research in any field by penal law. This is the first in mankind history that we have that the European Union forces members who have not yet passed laws in the European Union to do it or they are threatened with sanctions. Finland just passed earlier this year, the last one, because they said we’re threatened by the EU by some kind of sanctions or measures. And that’s why we introduced that law.

 

 

Now what does that mean? I’ve told you about my 44 months for the research. You can see that there are two books, Chemistry for Auschwitz, if you want to look at it. It’s my original forensic research and lectures on the Holocaust.

 

 

 

Having done what I’m doing right now here to academic audiences in Germany, talking about my research in the calm and academic style led to being sentenced. There were worse cases.

 

 

I want to focus here on Austria. Some of you have looked through a list of all the countries and some are not on this map. Actually, of course, Canada has introduced a law north of us and Australia uses a backdoor way of doing it. And Israel, of course, is the first country that has outlawed skepticism. And there are other countries who use other laws. They twist and tweak in order to send people to prison.

 

[09:23]

 

And in the Arabic world, unfortunately, we should think there should be an open mind there. A lot of governments in the Arabic world are bought by Europe and America and they prosecute dissidents on that topic with extra legal means. They are not democracies under the rule of law, whatever that means. Because in some aspects we are not anymore either. But for them it’s pure arbitrariness.

 

So this is a global thing, a global problem. We just had a censorship hit us, a company in China. We wanted to have merchandise produced with certain slogans on it on Holocaust skepticism. And they pulled a plug. Not even in China they want to do it anymore!

 

 

Austria, the worst case, 20 years! You can go up to 20 years in prison. If you combine it, the skepticism, quote, unquote, “denial” with statements that they interpret as re-engaging in National Socialist activities. If you were, for instance, to argue that the Austrians are just one tribe of the Germans and they should live together with other Germans in Germany, which was a normal thought up to 1945. In the 17th century, 18th century, 19th century, in the 20th century, as the people of Austria always felt. And they were for the longest time the core in the center of Germany. And they got kind of pushed out with Prussia taken over in the late 19th century. And then after the collapse of Prussian Germany and Austria, the Austrian Empire after the First World War, they said:

 

“Okay, we had it, now let’s get reunified.”

 

That was the idea of the Wilson 14 points for the truce to have everyone self-determination. And the Austrians got it denied. And after the war, Second World War, they had special laws enacted if you violate them, up to 20 years. Denial combined with demands for self-determination.

 

 

To put a face to it, Austrian engineer Wolfgang Fröhlich was arrested in the early 2000s for a paper he had written. He’s an expert for disinfestation technology and disinfestation gas chambers. So he knows the technique and compared it to what was said to have been going on in German extermination camp during the war. And said:

 

“That’s technical nonsense, it can’t be!”

 

And he got eventually indicted and put in prison. And he was upset about what they did to him. And he kept writing letters and arguments from within prison, got more and more indictments and got sentenced over and over again! At the end of the day, he spent 16 years in prison for his engineering arguments. And he came out just around Covid, caught Covid and died shortly afterwards.

 

Western politicians complain about Iran or China putting dissidents for four, five, seven years in prison. At the same time they put them for 16 years in prison! That’s the worst case.

 

 

This graph here shows you the initiation of criminal investigation for thought crimes in Germany. Since 1994 some 4, 500, up to the most recent data for, … The year 2025 comes out maybe next month. Getting a little bit of a feedback here. [humming sound] The blue one is Right-wing thought crimes. That’s what we are committing here right now! Okay? Then you have the Left-wing ones. These are usually Antifa communists who make some radical statements about blowing up Parliament or having a communist revolution. And then you have the green ones, foreign religious, that usually means Muslim, Muslim radicals who want to introduce Sharia law or something like that. So for these two cases you really have to make aggressive statements that are not peaceful anymore.

 

Whereas in these cases if you’re just against mass immigration, you say anything critical about the jews, any dissent on the Holocaust, or more recently anything critical about Israel’s policy in Gaza. This is the Gaza escalation that you see.

 

 

Germany has extended their law that they outlaw more and more both by case law and by actually written code. And now this past data we were up to 40,000, 35,000 of them. Stuff that people like we do, like what we argue and talk about. 35,000 initiated criminal investigations does not result in 35,000 people sitting in prison. I want to make that clear. Most people never get caught for the slogan they have sprayed on some wall or sticker they left somewhere. And if for first time offenders, usually it ends up with slap on the wrist. It may just be a summary offense with a fine that has to be paid. And for first time offenders it rarely ends with prison. But then you have the 1 or 2% of these cases that end up actually with prison cases.

 

[14:50]

 

Only minority of that is Holocaust skepticism. And I have no numbers, they don’t in their paperwork. This is data based actually on what the German government releases. And they are put proud of it! Because they call themselves a combative, defensive democracy! Okay?

 

So they defend themselves in combating anyone they consider to be an enemy. But they are actually the biggest enemy of democracy. I wouldn’t even call it democracy, but a state under the rule of law that respects human rights that they never get a mirror held against them to look into it because that’s the enemy that caused this kind of persecution.

 

Back to history. This kind of an atmosphere that you have in Europe, in most countries and even in this country where historians don’t go to prison, but immigrants like me, I’m currently constantly on an ejector seat and I can get thrown out any minute if the Trump government so decides, because they don’t respect the law either.

 

 

What effect does it have, actually concrete, on historians? Here you see the lovely face of Wacław Długoborski, Auschwitz survivor who was put in charge, as I say, the Billy goat that was put in charge of the garden. He was put in charge of the Auschwitz Museum’s historical research center. And for many decades he has been that boss. And under his auspices, the lie that 4 million people died at Auschwitz was maintained until the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

Then it did collapse, and they suddenly reduced the number from 4 million to 1 million and said:

 

“Well, we have known it all along.”

 

And then in an interview in 1998, this historian was asked:

 

“Well, why did you lie? Why did you make that up if you knew all along that it was wrong? Why didn’t you correct the number earlier when you knew that it was wrong?”

 

And he basically said:

 

“Well, there was a prohibition in place in the Eastern Bloc in the communist countries that historians who would not toe the party line could be facing.”

 

How he expressed it, “disciplinary measures”.

 

 

What does that mean? You lose your job, you’re getting demoted, you have to become a street sweeper, or a janitor. That’s what that means in these communist planned economies.

 

Ironically, 1998, that’s when he gave the interview. That was the same year Poland, pressured by the European Union, in particular Germany, introduced a law, 1998, that made Holocaust skepticism a crime punishable with up to three years in prison.

 

 

So from communist “disciplinary measures” to Democratic “three years in prison”. What’s worse? I’d take disciplinary measures anytime over prison term. So he said that:

 

“Now we can tell the truth! Back then we couldn’t because we had disciplinary measures. We’ve corrected. Now it’s 1 million. Because you need to believe us, because now we are only threatened with three years!”

 

Any mainstream person who thinks everything is kosher with the Holocaust narrative that we fed now must realize:

 

“Yeah, kosher it may be, it means the jews like it!”

 

But it most certainly doesn’t mean authentic and reliable, because historians who are threatened at gunpoint to write history cannot be trusted! He admits:

 

“We couldn’t be trusted! We have been lying. We knew we were lying. We did it intentionally, but we did so because we were threatened with getting demoted or losing our job!”

 

And now we should believe you when you are threatened with three years, with five years, with six years, with, 20 years! How much more do you need to teach people, to tell people, to realize you can’t trust these people! History at gunpoint does not give you the truth in no section of society!

 

 

So once you have opened up people’s mind and that they realize the dimension of persecution, of suppression, of oppression and the unique nature the Holocaust is unique in terms of the length governments go to and societies go to suppress dissent, to keep complete control over the narrative! Nowhere else in society will you find it. That shows you who is the main beneficiary usually is also the one who pushes most. And it shows you that this is for them the most important topic to keep total control over!

 

Once you have opened people mind:

 

“Something is fishy here! You can’t trust those historians because they have admitted they have lied when they were threatened even less than they are threatened today!”

 

Then we go to the pith, the center of the story. Now I handed it out to you guys, free of charge, a little brochure and I want to go through a few things here that you find actually in the brochure. If this thing is too far away from you, I apologize. But you’ll find some of this in this brochure.

 

[20:08]

 

 

And the first one I’m going to is actually on the last page, the back cover if you wish. You know that thing technically speaking has no back cover. You see a graph there, a bar chart that shows claims of death tolls for the Majdanek camp. Now I would assume that most of you, at least most of normal populace have not heard about the Majdanek! Camp. It’s not anymore a major player in the bigger picture of the Holocaust in terms of mass extermination. It used to be completely different. The Majdanek camp actually was officially called the Lublin camp in central Poland was overrun by the Red Army in July of 1944.

 

So it was first major camp that the Soviets overran. And in a press conference right after the conquest of the camp, and I say “conquest”, the Red Army never liberated anyone! So you will not hear the word “liberation” when it even comes to camps, when it comes to the Red Army.

 

 

So they conquered the camp. In the press conference they claimed 2 million people were murdered there. It was the first big, still doing the war propaganda campaign on extermination, claim that started in August 1944. Big show! With all the world media, invited journalists from everywhere and cameras rolling.

 

 

Now in subsequent events, the Poles later that year still during the war, by the way, December ’44 had a show trial. They claimed 1.7 million. That’s a little bit of a reduction, but they weren’t generous. It’s kind of the same order of magnitude.

 

 

The Soviets then during the International Military Tribunal introduced an expert report. They claimed 1.5 million. Still again, 500,000 difference is not immaterial. But in the bigger picture, looking at it scientifically, it’s kind of the same order of magnitude. We don’t want to be nitpicking here.

 

However, the frenzy of immediate end of the war or post-war propaganda comes to an end and things cool down a little bit. And a Polish investigative judge reduces the number down to 360,000. And this is a considerable drop!

 

 

We’re down to 80%! Now, as I just showed you, there is a rule in communist countries you have to toe the party line and the new party line was 360,000. Couldn’t really go underneath that, even though they knew again, they knew in this case too, it is wrong! I think the number of prisoners sent to the camp was around that order of magnitude. And that assumes that every single one of them was murdered. And there’s plenty of documentation shown that was absolutely not the case!

 

The Soviet Union collapses and the number gets reduced again by a new historian in charge of the museum. 235,000. Not all that extreme a drop if you compare it with Auschwitz, compared to these two. But here we have already almost only 10%.

 

 

But that wasn’t the end of it. We Holocaust skeptics went into the archives after the Soviet Union collapsed, 1994, 95, 96. And researched the whole material, published a investigation on it. And it was so devastatingly demasking the propaganda of the homicidal gas chamber story, that pressure on the Majdaneck museum became so big that eventually in 2005, a new generation, a new historian dropped the death toll to 76,000. And that is only not even 4% of the initial 2 million claim.

 

 

And actually from the beginning they had claimed seven homicidal gas chambers. They maintained that number until the end. But five of them were so ridiculously, obviously, technically impossible to have ever been used for what they claim to have been used that to throw propaganda ballast overboard.

 

 

 

Thomas Kranz, the new Polish historian, threw five of them overboard. So what we have is an admission:

 

“That okay, we exaggerated, we lied, we lied, we fix, we fix, we keep fixing, we drop more and more of these lies!”

 

And then that’s what the situation is here today. They keep shifting the goalposts, they keep reducing the claim. You see, something is fishy with their attitude in general. But now:

 

“They got it right!”

 

Really, when you’re threatened with three years in prison? Why would I believe you?

 

[24:48]

 

Now we could say:

 

“Okay, one camp. What does one camp prove? That’s the most extreme downward revision by the mainstream.”

 

I haven’t shown our number that would here in 98, we published the book.

 

 

We find in the historical record 42, 200 death cases and no homicidal death chambers at all! They were all fumigation chambers!

 

So I’m just showing you what the mainstream itself has admitted to have been wrong over and over again! Is it a singular case? People make mistakes. Corrections for other camps? If you go in the brochure, if you want to go on page six, you see the table there now the same table here, the major camps that played a role in Allied war as well as immediate post-war propaganda as claimed extermination camps.

 

 

You see the initial death toll here on the left numbers column. And the death toll that is claimed by the mainstream.

 

 

Again, I say in the mainstream, Holocaust skeptical numbers? What really can be documented and what is forensically possible is an entirely different story.

 

So I want to show you that if you just use their own arguments and their shifty way of moving goalposts, you should make every believer see something isn’t right. And you see it here, mistakes stray statistically from the true value. If I make a mistake, I may under or overestimate, but they should stray to both sides. Here you see only one tendency, extreme exaggeration!

 

 

That’s not called a mistake, that’s called a lie! Truth is always the first victim of every war. And why should it be any different with the Second World War? The victors write the history and they never write it objectively. And why should it be any different for the worst war ever fought that ended for the losing side in a major disaster that mankind has not seen all that often in history? Cathage and the Punic wars probably had a worse fate than Germany because they got completely wiped. But other than that, Germany was in pretty bad shape after the Second World War.

 

So you see here, these are lies! They have been lying systematically! They have been correcting and admitting in Auschwitz, I showed you here in Majdanek again and again they lied. They knew they’re lying. And now they are threatened even worse than they were before. The question.

 

 

So for my Majdanek, 96% of the victims were invented. 70% of the homicidal gas chambers were invented. They got it wrong repeatedly acting under coercion, still under coercion even worse so today! Why believe them uncritically now? You wouldn’t!

 

 

And it doesn’t stop with numbers. If you go on the second table of the page six here, we’re talking about invented methods. What the mainstream, again, what the mainstream has admitted, we’re looking in the second column here, of all the stuff that is actually has been invented.

 

 

And I actually added a few more here on this one. And here you see for Auschwitz, war gases, high voltage electrocution, gas showers, gas bombs, pneumatic hammer, conveyor belt.

 

 

Treblinka, you have machine guns, mobile gas chambers, stunning gas, unslaked lime, hot steam, high voltage, chlorine, ether, a death bridge, burning alive.

 

 

So it goes on and on for the other camps. Suffocation with human excrements as a mass murder method is claimed for Bełzec by one witness. It gets absurd at times. But of course, all this stuff, sometimes based on only one witness, sometimes based on tens of witnesses on all kinds of wartime reports, got dumped! Interestingly, the stories that prevailed during the war, hot steam for Treblinkaa, high voltage for Belzec, chlorine gas for Sobibor, all got dumped! You won’t find a word of it today anymore, even though they were the ones that were most commonly claimed during the war, and even during the International Military Tribunal, by the way. It’s all gone!

 

 

What we have left now is this. Zyklon B, and engine exhaust gases. For a long time they even claimed they were diesel exhaust gases, which are technically impossible because they’re not toxic enough.

 

 

Just recently, well, not too recently, 15 years ago, a mainstream toxicologist tried to move the goalpost there again:

 

“Okay, diesel doesn’t work. Why don’t we say it was engine exhaust?”

 

 

So murder methods claimed during and right after the war were highly contradictory. Even once claimed main murder methods were all abandoned! Polish Stalinist officials streamline the narrative against facts! And mainstream historians hide these extreme revisions and manipulations from you! Because they are writing history on gunpoint!

 

[29:58]

 

How was it done? To give you one example, and unfortunately I don’t think I have that in this brochure. You would actually have to go, because that goes a little bit more into detail for which this brochure doesn’t have room. I have that detailed example in this book here. Nazi Gas Chambers, which you can either buy there as a hard copy or you can find it on holocausthandbooks.com free of charge as an ebook.

 

 

The one case that shows everyone, and should show every normie that the story was faked, is the case of Sobibor! Now again, Auschwitz, everyone knows, Treblinka, some of you may have heard. Bełzec, maybe. Majdanek, unlikely. Sobibor also, not very often. Sobibor is one of the three so-called “pure extermination camps”. Actually four. Chelmno is a special camp. It’s a separate issue.

 

 

Treblinkaa, Belzec and Sobibor are the three big ones that were jews were shipped to be murdered and nothing else. That’s the claim of the mainstream. Sobibor was the smallest of them. Treblinka. The other here started out with 3 million. Belzec, 3 million claim and Sobibor with, 20 million. It’s down to 200,000 now, plus, minus. There’s always this kind of an average of the mainstream claim because they can’t really agree exactly on how much. But the other ones are way higher.

 

 

Sobibor is an interesting case. The same judge who after the war downgraded massively the death toll from Majdanek to 360,000 also investigated the Sobibor camp and the Treblinkaa camp and wrote the story for it for the Polish Commission for German War Crimes. He investigated a number of witnesses. They are listed here by name.

 

 

Right after the war, the inmates that were alive in summer of 1943 had a revolt in the Sobibor camp. There’s actually a movie about that. Not very historically accurate, but the revolt did take place and many witnesses, survivors or inmates, ran away and they ended up testifying in front of that investigative judge. This is Zdzislaw Tukaszkiewicz. Now the interesting thing is of what they told him. Right now for Sobibor, they claim engine exhaust gas as the murder method.

 

 

And they are supposed to have been murdered in just a normal chamber. One door. They walk in, they get killed with gas, the other door at the other end opens out and they get carried out to mass graves or pyres to be burned. That’s the mainstream narrative right now! However, if you look at what these witnesses testified, if they describe the alleged murder method, many of them said chlorine. Nobody said engine exhaust. Not a single witness!

 

 

What they claimed of the mechanics of the gas chamber is very interesting because they kind of agreed, with a few exceptions of witnesses who didn’t say anything about that.

 

 

That the floors in those chambers were hydraulically opened up, they collapsed downward, discharge the dead victims into two carts running on tracks below in some kind of basement area, and would then be driven out to mass graves or to cremation pyres. And they agreed on that you will not hear a single thing about that in the mainstream narrative! What Zdzislaw Tukaszkiewicz did when he wrote, based on his interrogations, that’s the only evidence he had, he said:

 

“Well, they were killed with engine exhaust and with just a normal gas chamber with doors.”

 

Invented out of the blue! With no basis in fact of any of the evidence! He threw out all the witnesses!

 

 

Now where did he get that narrative from? He actually copied it over. I just mentioned he had also investigated the Treblinka camp. He had copied it over from the narrative he had developed from the Treblinka camp!

 

 

And if you were to go there. I don’t want to go do that now again, you can find the list of witnesses and what they said on Treblinka in here. You find in Treblinka this chaos here! Electrocution, engine exhaust, gas, vacuum, steam, all kinds of claims. He cleaned that up, threw everything out, kept the engine exhaust and wrote the narrative according to that.

 

 

And then he copied it over to Sobibor. That is invented history with no basis in fact, none whatsoever in the case of Sobibor! The clearest case where you can absolutely pinpoint what happened.

 

So that is what you find if you go into the historical record, which became accessible to us only after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in the archives in the east became accessible. And we could actually go to these interrogation protocols and then see what narrative they made of it.

 

There is an interesting question that arises. Why was that done? I mean, it’s an obvious question. You want to look, make your enemy look as bad as possible. So whatever comes after the war, you can manipulate and destroy them as much as possible. Psychological warfare is just a continuation of warfare with other means. And ethnically speaking, the whole Second World War broke out because the actual tinderbox that blew it up, there were many more conflicts around the globe was the ethnic conflicts between Poles and Germans, mainly over the city of Danzig.

 

 

And after the war, as you may know, Poland gained huge territories from Germany and expelled the population. My paternal ancestry was expelled from Silesia, so they were part of the victims of that. And Germany was not willing after the First World War to accept the loss of Danzig, which was a 95% German city. How would you make them expect to accept the loss of a quarter of its entire territory and the expulsion of 7 million civilians from their homeland, where they had lived for centuries. And were not just a majority in large parts of the world, just only Germans, all gone! How do you accept Germany to this time accept it?

 

If you break the German spine with a guilt complex, you can make them accept anything as justified punishment. And that’s what the homicidal gas chambers are good for!

 

[36:49]

 

 

Now I’ve looked into all of the people who have done the investigation on those camps and who have written the history. We’re actually talking about only four individuals that were doing the investigation. I’ve mentioned Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz for Treblinka, for Majdanek and for Sobibor. Jan Sehn was investigative judge for Auschwitz. For Belzec we have an historian. There was no trial on Belzec. That was Eugeniusz Szrojt. And for Chelmno, which isn’t even on here, it’s a special case. There it is actually. It was Wladyslaw Bednarz.

 

So we have four Polish individuals all working for the Polish commission for the investigation of war crimes and Stalinist organization set up by Stalin to stick it to the Germans and to use all kinds of fishy methods, as I just said, and with the aim of destroying Germany psychologically and make them accept all that was coming their way. And it worked “beautifully”, quote, unquote.

 

This is if you present these things that way, I have found you can get people to understand first of all that it’s not some lunatic idea, but that there’s something profoundly wrong in a society that prescribes the writing of any scholarly field under the threat of punishment. And what that must lead to is untruthfulness of scholars. And then showing them, yeah, they have admitted over and over again to have lied, to have shifted the goalpost to hide facts from us, to completely change their story.

 

And then psychologically, very important, it’s not the jews who did it. In a great conspiracy theory! That’s what I’m getting here. I’m not saying I want to win the jews over seeing how they were duped, they were. But you know, all those witnesses at the end of it, most of them are jews. They had an axe to grind. I can’t blame them. They were treated horribly. And in the frenzy of post-war propaganda, they were making stuff up!

 

And this is completely made up stuff here! And they even co-ordinated these witnesses. Coordinated, as they couldn’t have come up all with the same story. But the investigative judge couldn’t do anything with it. In other cases, they were so contradictory, they weren’t coordinating any of these witnesses. They were just inventing whatever came.

 

And in the complete frenzy of post-war anti-German hysteria, you can understand where they are coming from. It would have been the judge’s job to say:

 

“This is all nonsense! We can’t make head or tail out of it. And therefore, we need to say that!”

 

They didn’t do that. These judges were put in by the new Stalinist government. It was a Stalinist agenda. I couldn’t find any jewish backgrounds in any of those four individuals. I don’t know the chain of command. They did what they did on orders. Nothing of that kind of propagandistic political nature was left to chance.

 

So you can bet that there were orders coming from Warsaw and from Moscow. What type they were, this is the kind of investigation we have yet to do. Whether in that chain of command jews were sitting, I don’t know. But they are not needed. You can see here the Stalinist will to completely destroy psychologically Germany and to pit Poland against Germany. That is an important point. Hitler had tried until 39, until the very last moment, to win the Poles over for an anti-communist pact against Stalinist Russia. And Stalinist Russia tried to conquer all of Europe. That was the declared concept of world revolution from 1918 onward. It wasn’t a secret. And Hitler tried to make a bulwark, a European fortress against Stalin’s plan to conquer all of Europe. Poland refused and went their way of poking the German eagle to the point where they lashed out. And the rest is history.

 

[40:46]

 

Pitting Poland against Germany. Any other normal nation. If you imagine Mexico in a World War that breaks out between Russia, China and the United States, United States loses and then Mexico gets everything that they used to own and more. You name the States of Texas, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, California. Give everything to the Mexicans and drive out every White American. Would America put up with it if they gain strength again? How do you get the Germans to accept that kind of calamity? It worked. What did not work. And I want to make that sure. Even though my parents were expelled, my parental ancestors were expelled from that region. Is that today Germany and Poland are not pitted against each other anymore.

 

I’ve gone with my father to the our Poles who had expelled him and his family in the 1980s and 90s. German expellees went back to Poland to party with our Poles in the house it used to belong to my grandfather! There’s no frontier, no border between Germany and Poland anymore. If I wanted, the German government not sticking me in prison for other reasons, I could go back and settle where my parental ancestors came from. That story is over. In Europe we don’t kill each other. We don’t kill White people over territorial. That should be the case. Unfortunately, the Russians and the Ukrainians have yet to learn that lesson. That is over. Stalin did not succeed in pitting us against each other we work together.

 

Now, I am saying these things in order to make you understand where this come from, how it was done, who did it, why they did it! Not in order to, say, give Germany its territories, they can’t even populate their current territory, nor can the Poles. The real biggest challenge for all of us in Europe is population collapse, which is something I will talk about tonight, by the way, and how this ties in to all these issues that I’ve been talking about historically.

 

So now we are not talking territories here. We’re talking about historical understanding and to make the jews understand and the Zionists, we’re not coming after you. We’re not blaming you for having constructed this narrative in order to whatever. Sure, they took advantage of it, particularly since 1961 when the gravy train was already running with the Eichmann trial big time, and ever since have been profited from that.

 

But if you look in the first decades of the state of Israel and of the jewish community, particularly in this country, they were not riding the Holocaust train! It wasn’t even called that way back then. The partial identity between Soviet spies in the United States and a religious jewish background was troublesome truth for the jewish community. They kept their head low in the early years of the Cold War and were not rocking the boat.

 

So this way you can make even the jews see we’re not out for revenge for what you did to us, psychologically. The story came from a different angle. And I think that is because people assume we are spreading these Holocaust “denial theories”, as they call them, in order to get at the jews, in order to say the jews have made this big conspiracy in order to get us and destroy us. Yeah, it’s being used now as such. What happens now with them manipulating us with this and saying in order to prevent anything like that happening again, we must allow and support them to pre-emptively kill everyone that even looks askance at them, which is what’s happening in Gaza and what the conflict with many of these nations in the Middle East with Israel is about. That’s a separate story where we are today.

 

Historically seen as it started differently and it has taken on its own life. And we need to break that vicious circle we are in, using this presumed genocide, say what happens to the jews as we define genocide by the United Nations and in law, actually it was a genocide. You don’t need gas chambers to commit genocide. If you separate people so that they can’t reproduce, it’s already called genocide. And that’s what the National Socialists did in the camps, separating genders and putting them under living conditions that inevitably had to lead to many of them dying of disease and so forth. So technically speaking, legally speaking, how it is defined today, it was genocide. Now, that law didn’t exist back then. That’s a legal fine print.

 

So this genocide in its downgraded fashion without homicidal gas chambers, which didn’t exist, but the homicidal gas chambers being the foremost psychological weapon to traumatize the jews, young jews of new generation today and every one of us, we have gone through this education and know how shocking it is to see these bulldozers shoving corpses into mass graves at Bergen-Belsen and being told that’s what the Germans did to the jews. That was Fforce majeure of epidemics breaking out in camps that the Germans had no control over. They didn’t plan that. But you’re not being told that.

 

And the effect of it is that America for the most part is willing to go along, and Europe, to go along with what the jews and Zionists do in the Middle East. To break that vicious circle, to get a correct understanding, we can learn the correct lessons of history only if we get first the facts straight. And no matter what the facts are, morally speaking, you are never allowed to use past catastrophes of whatever nature to justify or foment current and future catastrophes! And that’s what’s happening. In order to prevent a new “Holocaust”, Israel is committing genocide.

 

[46:54]

 

So in order to prevent genocide, they commit genocide! There’s something wrong with this! And to see how we are manipulated with historical accounts being exaggerated and invented, to see it in this old example, the most extreme example, makes us see that happens all the time. What was it October 7, 2023, what happened there. Israel has a law outlawing, as I just mentioned, it was the first one outlawing Holocaust skepticism. And they have now introduced a law outlawing Gaza skepticism in terms of just what happened on the 7th of October. And they are probably in the process of making it a crime to accuse Israel of genocide.

 

All right, I’m having, as I mentioned, a second presentation tonight. We are talking about demographic collapse and where that leaves us, which options we have and what the various drivers are, which Holocaust propaganda actually is one of them. And I’ll explain that tonight. I hope I’ll get a chance to talk to you and maybe even discuss that with you guys.

 

 

If you want to look into this book, if you don’t have it yet, about how this core of the Holocaust, the homicide, gas chamber story, was created. As I mentioned there you can have it.

 

 

The encyclopedia also. I still have six copies floating around. Please keep the brochure. It is a short description and summary of Holocaust revisionist arguments with reference of all the books. You can find them all free of charge at holocausthandbooks.com. But you can also buy them from us on these websites and you’ll find links to purchase them.

 

And if you don’t want to keep it, leave it on the table and we’ll collect it later because this is advertising for our products, for our knowledge, for our insight, and we liked it to get spread.

 

So thank you for your attention.

 

[49:00]

 

[loud applause]

 

[Outro message]

 

 

If you want to learn more, here are a few suggested websites. At our Holocaust Encyclopedia you can find concise information on almost 600 related topics with references to further reading.

 

 

 

The results of 35 years of archival and forensic research into the Holocaust can be accessed free of charge at our Holocaust Handbooks website, where you can also access several documentaries as well as our Mini Series Holocaust Pocketbooks, which give easy to read introductions into various topics.

 

 

 

Printed copies of these and many other books can be purchased on our websites armreg.us and armreg.co.uk.

 

 

At our Holocaust Academy, we teach the ropes of skeptical Holocaust research.

 

 

 

It also features our growing podcast series named “Holocast”.

 

 

At the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, we lobby for free speech where it is threatened the most.

 

 

Most prominently with our periodical Inconvenient History.

 

And last but not least, Germar Rudolf’s personal website where you can learn more about him.

 

 

[50:22]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/23/2026 = 3)

Unlocking_Freedom
5 days ago
This video is so important. Discussing with a normie has many challenges, layers of brain washing, mind control by legacy media. https://www.printernational.co.uk/timmann2/history.htm#holocaust Approaching such a sensitive subject, especially with relatives is so hard. Yes the method of just sciences : Biology : Cholera, Tuberculosis (TB), Famine, Dysentery and Typhoid (Typhus) were at epidemic levels of disease Engineering : Wooden Doors, Floor Drains in a “gas chamber” Architecture : Swinging Doors Chemistry : Residue in the walls This video is a better beginning because the banning is a serious question for thought control. Exaggeration to Reduction in numbers comes from the authorities, which normies only will accept. Changing method of executions. There is no consistency.
1
0

Lueger
1 week ago
https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000207&FassungVom=2023-01-08 interesting history of the modifications of this “Verbotsgesetz 1947” in Austria

‹ Hide 1 reply
Lueger
1 week ago
The AI could not identify a legislative or political donor impetus for the 1992 amendment, but that the “1992 Verbotsgesetz amendment was adopted by the Austrian Parliament with broad cross‑party support; it was driven by government and parliamentary lawmakers (major parties including the SPÖ and ÖVP), backed publicly by Jewish organizations and civil‑society groups concerned about rising neo‑Nazi activity and legal inconsistency. Major identifiable supporters were: Parliamentary sponsors and supporters: members of the governing parties at the time (Social Democratic Party — SPÖ — and Austrian People’s Party — ÖVP) who voted for the amendment in Parliament. Wikipedia Civil-society and community backers: Austrian Jewish organizations and international Jewish groups, prosecutors and legal scholars who urged a clear statutory prohibition to close court inconsistencies and enable prosecutions.” I asked it to enumerate and identify the neo-nazi events, which it indicated would take 30 minutes. Bin gespannt.
0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript