Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to tonight’s stream. We’re live on Odysee, Rumble, DLive and Entropy. And I’ve got a wonderful panel for you here tonight to discuss the big issue of, well, the last week or so, and it’s obviously Trump’s war for Israel or Trump’s war on Iran for Israel, to be more precise.

 

Now, the guys I’ve got with me I’ll be introducing shortly. It’s of course Natty and Yuro from the Nationalist A-Team. We’re going to cover some of the things we covered last Sunday quickly. And then we’re going to go deeper into things. Everyone’s going to get roughly an equal time to talk. I’m not going to be putting people on an egg timer, but we’ve probably got nine or ten topics and if everyone puts sort of three, four minutes into each topic, it’ll be about a 90 minute presentation. So stick around. It’s going to be pretty entertaining or at least pretty enlightening.

 

You might have noticed I’m not on camera tonight. My apologies for that it’s not because I’m being rude. Slightly under the weather today, actually. I don’t know whether I sound it and if I do, my apologies. But I am doing my best to essentially be as chirpy as humanly possible, all things considered.

 

Now, if you like this stream, please share it. If you really like this dream, please consider making a donation. Please consider contributing to my work. You can do so via Entropy and also directly through Rumble. Anything that is sent tonight, any Superchat, any donation that has a message attached, the message will be read out live on tonight’s stream.

 

So we will talk about that. So if you’ve got a different point of view, if you’ve got something you want to raise, if you think we’ve missed something, or if you just say:

 

“Look, Mark, I really appreciate the fact that you’ve been consistent for the last, 26 years and I want to keep you fighting even though you’re banned from everywhere.”

 

I appreciate that as well.

 

So thank you in advance for everyone who Superchats. You can also donate by crypto all the crypto links in the description below.

 

And finally you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Although I didn’t answer emails this morning, again under the weather. So sorry guys, back to things on Monday. Unless I’ve got some kind of horrible illness that drags on past then and sort of takes me out, which I’m sure I haven’t. That’s quite a morbid thought. Anyway! We are going to get into it now, but before we do that, let’s go around the group and we’ll introduce everyone.

 

Now, the first is of course Natty. You know him from the Nationalist A-Team and also from numerous other streams that he’s done with me in the past. Natty’s a guy that’s been around since the beginning of PA. He’s been to all the meetings, at conferences, camps, etc, and he’s always someone that everyone likes hearing from.

 

In fact, I always say that if I had a wingman on PWR, it would be this guy here. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? I hope you are well.

 

Natty: Yeah, I’m good. I’m enjoying watching Tel Aviv burn. I’m sure we’re gonna talk about the ins and outs of what that means, but yeah, I’m good apart from that it’s been a bit of a crazy week trying to keep up with everything and I think my wife has suffered constantly looking across at me and seeing my face buried in my phone because I’m trying to, I’m monitoring the situation. But yeah, it’s very interesting times.

 

Mark Collett: Do you ever get it where you’re out on the sort of a supposed family event and the wife’s like:

 

“Why aren’t you paying any attention? All you’re doing is sitting on the phone. What can be so important that you need to be on your phone at this family event?”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Look, you know, Israel is on fire. Tel Aviv is being hit with hypersonic missiles. Chill out!”

 

Natty: It’s like:

 

“Honey, there’s cluster munitions going off above a suburb in Tel Aviv. This is really important. [chuckling] I’m watching it right now! It’s amazing!”

 

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] that’s kind of that’s kind of the str. I’d say that that’s the struggle that we have.!

 

Anyway, we’ve also got Yuro with us tonight. He’s obviously famous because Yuro used to do The Absolute State of Britain podcast.

 

And again, he’s a very able wing man. He has been on the National A-Team standing in for Sam. He always has good takes, he’s a funny guy and sometimes I bully him a bit, which is a little unfair, but that’s because I love him and see him as like my little brother, My little brother who needs the odd sort of monkey scrub and jab in the ribs, but he’s like my little brother, so I still love him.

 

Anyway, Yuro, how are you doing, my friend?

 

Yuro: I’m good. I’ve also been keenly paying attention watching Middle East Spectator and other such channels on Telegram. You know, it’s, I think there’s a lot more censorship obviously during the 12 Day War that was going on between Iran and Israel before. It was very much like:

 

“Well, what can we believe? How much are they not showing you?”

 

And it’s just that more. So we see all of Iran’s failures and then some things that’s like disinfo and we see all of Israel’s successes and then some, and some of that’s disinfo. And it’s kind of hard to even know what’s real.

 

[04:47]

 

Natty: That’s a good point actually because just briefly, it does seem like the information blackout from Israel was way more intense during the 12 Day War. And it seems like now because of the scope and the breadth of everything, just more is getting through or you’re able to find out more. And I’m sure this isn’t true, if you check the BBC or just some other like ZOG regime outlet, you’re not going to be seeing anything hitting Israel. But that’s what everyone’s interested in. That’s what everyone wants to see. [chuckling] You know, how many hypersonics hit Tel Aviv? This time, you know what US asset has just been blown up by a drone in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain or wherever it is. That’s what people are interested in seeing. They want to see the underdog smacking the bully in the mouth. And that’s what happens when a cheap Shahed drone gets through a multi-million dollar interceptor screen and like blows up a THAAD [Terminal High Altitude Area Defense] radar system or something. That’s what everyone’s into, right? Everyone wants to see that. No one wants to see like Iranian suburbs being like caught on fire and hit with JDAMs and hit with Tomahawk missiles because that’s just brutal civilian casualties, which is what ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] is good at.

 

Yuro: Well, the funny thing is to see America in this war using the copy of the Iranian kamikaze drones. They’ve got their own basically one to one copy of the Shahed drone that they’ve now rolled out and they’re starting to fire back at the Iranians. Because it was just like the near perfect design that they’re like:

 

“We can’t make any better than this. We’re just going to copy it.”

 

Natty: Yeah. You know, for the grand and mighty American empire is reverse engineering Third World brownoid country drones [chuckling] that sound like lawnmowers when they’re flying through the sky!

 

But yeah, that’s what America’s up to these days. I mean, you can’t really claim it’s the European heritage stock that’s like the most genius country in the world. It’s just not that anymore, I’m afraid, guys.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. But we’ve got a lot to talk about. So and we do actually have just. We do have a little sort of running order as well, tonight. I’m not going to read it out, but I was going to post it actually and say:

 

“Look, these are all the things we’ll be discussing.”

 

But there’s a lot to discuss and we’re going to go through things from the start. Now we’re going to speed run some of the bits we talked about on the Nationalist A-Team because for anyone who watched the Nationalist A-Team and enjoys it, look, it is a banger of a stream, except for when I get killed by somebody and get upset.

 

But other than that! It is a good stream. And if you want to watch it, there’s some takes there. And also there’s the Patriarch there as well who provides quite a lot of good comedy.

 

Anyway, so we’re going to start with the wider justification for this because there’s nowhere better to start than the official justification. Now, I’ve seen these videos where Netanyahu, they’re sort of like compilation videos of every time Netanyahu is claimed that Iran is sort of five months, five weeks, you know, two years from getting the atomic bomb. And he’s been doing this, believe it or not, for over 30 years!

 

So the first example I’ve seen of Netanyahu saying that Iran is just moments away from like nuclear weapon capability was actually all the way back in 1995. And the reason that’s interesting, …

 

Yuro: There are people dying in this war on the American side who have not been alive longer than Iran was supposedly two weeks away from a nuclear weapon!

 

Mark Collett: That’s a very good point. That is Yuro. But you get minus points for butting in. You’ve been told about that.

 

Natty: Oh, no [word unclear] battalion!

 

Mark Collett: Wiffle bat to give you a spanking. Right. So these fake nuclear claims that are interesting for two reasons.

 

Firstly, because they are blatantly fake! It’s been, to my knowledge, 31 years. And Yuro does make, … Look to Yuro’s credit, he makes a very good point. You know, the idea that this has been going on longer than some of the people on these American battleships have been alive is incredible!

 

But one thing that struck me immediately with this was I remember living through the time of the Iraq war. And at the time of the Iraq war, Weapons of Mass Destruction became one of the most maligned phrases to have ever been used in British Parliament, to the point that where if you now say “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, it’s sort of synonymous with war crimes, lies and a regime that took us into what was essentially an illegal war. You know, there was no Weapons of Mass Destruction.

 

But one thing that shocks me is this is the kind of thing where people just seem to have either forgotten this or put it to one side.

 

So the Daily Mail is a classic example of this. The Daily Mail is sort of the populist Right-wing, you know, vote Reform, consider voting Conservative newspaper. And they were all against Blair and the Weapons of Mass Destruction and exposing his lies and speaking out about it once it was exposed via the Chilcot inquiry.

 

But now the Daily Mail, like:

 

“We need this war. You know, usually we’re against war, but in this instance, this needs to happen!”

 

And you’ve got all these shill commenters in the sections underneath the Daily Mail articles in the comment sections, and they’re all saying things like:

 

“Oh, I’m against the war, but this is an exception.”

 

And I don’t know whether these are real people, idiot Boomer types or that’s not all Boomers. But you know, the sort. I mean the kind of person that says:

 

“Oh, well, I’m against the people on the small boats, but I would let the genuine refugees in all. Yes! And if somebody comes here and learns to speak English, well, he’s as British as Yorkshire pudding, isn’t he!”

 

Those sort. Is it one of them or is it a shill account?

 

[11:04]

 

But I think it’s really interesting that exactly the same justification for the attack is being used, as was used in Iraq. But the Iraq, War retrospectively is possibly the most maligned conflict and the conflict seen as the most unjust conflict. Probably post World War II. I’d have said that would have gone to Vietnam at one point, but Iraq seems to have, maybe because it’s more recent, seems to have eclipsed that.

 

So what do you guys think?

 

We’ll start with you, Natty. Obviously this is what they’re saying and we’re going to discuss next the real reason and what we think the real reason is. But what do you think to this sort of fake reasoning for going to war?

 

Natty: Well, just listening to you there, I haven’t done this because I was just reminded by what you said. But I’m fairly certain if you went back to the 2000s and had a look at the lead up to the Iraq war, you, amongst the Daily Mail articles, you wouldn’t find opposition to the actual war itself, because none of these publications were really opposed to it in any meaningful way and certainly weren’t like trying to rally people against the war. So you know, post Iraq war when everyone was kind of saying what disaster it was, I’m sure the Daily Mail were jumping on board that.

 

But as even now publications that you would think would be against the war in Iran are kind of talking around the edge of it whilst not decrying the war and certainly not being like anti-war, like proper anti-war publications and laying out all the connections between the Epstein regime and the people connecting in it like Mandelson and like Boris Johnson and Tony Blair and all the rest of it.

 

But yeah, it’s striking. I mean, one of the things I put in the chat earlier was that before this happened. Well, okay, let’s let me take it back a little bit. Before Iraq, the reason why the term “Weapons of Mass Destruction” became such a big thing is because the media and the government, Blair’s regime spent so much time and energy trying to get public approval for it, because they felt like, they obviously felt like they needed it. They needed a justification. They needed something to sell to the British people as to why it was a good idea, why it was necessary to go into Iraq.

 

Now that just hasn’t happened this time. Because I think they understand that the forces controlling the “Epstein Empire” as people are calling it, which is fairly apt, simply are not in the shadows anymore. You know, this stuff has been laid out. Israel is pulling the strings and it’s pulling the strings of America and it’s America’s pulling the strings of Europe because essentially Europe is just a colony of the United States. So they don’t feel they need to justify it so much.

 

Now, obviously there’s like regime mouthpieces and stoolies like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray, the Daily Mail and all the rest of it, who are now going out there and running cover and trying to make this war popular or make it so that it seems like:

 

“Well, it’s not a job any of us want to do, but it’s necessary and we need to do this for stability and peace!”

 

But I just don’t think the public are buying it. And the public for the most part didn’t buy it with Iraq, but that doesn’t stop that happening. And they’re not buying it with Iran either.

 

But there hasn’t been a groundswell of opposition to it in the same way as Iraq because they haven’t spent so long trying to justify it. And for a lot of people this just came out the blue. Not for anyone who’s kind of a properly dissident to the kind of Epstein Empire. This didn’t come out of the blue. This was fairly predictable. But probably just for your average person sitting at home and getting on with life, this kind of immediate blow up in the Middle East, where oil prices are about to skyrocket, petrol prices creeping up and we’re probably about to experience an energy crisis, just came out straight out of the blue! And the justifications, unlike Iraq, are all post hoc. They, it wasn’t a media build up to a war, it’s like a media cover plot after the war has started.

 

Yuro: What I find interesting as well is as you say, with the Iraq thing, there was a lot of build up and there was:

 

“Let’s get the UN involved, let’s condemn them, let’s build a coalition, let’s get Britain involved.”

 

But the other thing is they never said Iraq has a nuke. It was always this nebulous “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. And it’s kind of like the, well, we’re going to say that they have Weapons of Mass Destruction and that’s like we will say:

 

“Oh, actually they have chemical weapons which we’re going to classify as Weapons of Mass Destruction. And we’re going to hope that we can gin that up in people’s minds to be like, ‘Oh, they have a nuclear weapon’.”

 

And it was like:

 

“We won’t explicitly state they have a nuclear weapon. We’ll just try and make people think they have a nuclear weapon.”

 

And then there was the thing about:

 

“They can strike us in 45 minutes with their Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But now they just come out and say:

 

“They’re building a nuke!”

 

It’s not Weapons of Mass Destruction. And as you say, that’s because the term is just completely lost all validity. You know, people at the moment, they hear that, they just know it’s Iraq, War 2. But they’re not even like trying to do that lesser thing.

 

It’s kind of like what they do with racism, where you’ve got like the small definition and the big definition. The Weapons of Mass Destruction is like what they do with racism.

 

So if you’re a “racist”, it’s like you just think that different people are different and you care about your own people. Well, that’s a racist. But the moment you get labelled a racist, it’s like you’re a “supremacist who wants to murder everyone who’s not you”. Well, the Weapons of Mass Destruction is chemical weapons could be a weapon of mass destruction, but the moment you get labelled with that, all of a sudden:

 

“You’ve got nukes, you’re dangerous!”

 

[17:31]

 

Natty: Yeah. And the 45 minute claim was like, they can hit the tip of Cyprus. If they drive a Scud launcher right to the edge of the Iraqi border and fire it, they might just be able to hit Cyprus! And that was translated into British headlines as “British territory”. Yeah:

 

“They can hit us in 45 minutes! Oh my God, the sky’s falling!”

 

And the reality was, it was Scud missiles and some Sarin gas artillery shells which have a range of about 10 or 15 kilometers, which they used in Halabja [1988 against Kurds] apparently. I mean, we saw, I, we got trained on that in the CBRA regiment of what happened in Halabja with the Sarin gas shells. But that was passed into, like you said, Weapons of Mass Destruction. Very nebulous. Well, not easy to disseminate term, but very little detail and very little meaning. And you could say to people:

 

“Well, they’ve got Scud launches on trucks which can fly however many kilometers it is, and they’ve got some Sarin gas shells.”

 

But these, in terms of where the United Kingdom is and the rest of Europe, these are absolutely meaningless! And again, it was just to justify the Greater Israel Project and take out one of Israel’s enemies and destroy one of Israel’s enemies.

 

Yuro: Well, I was having to think about this before we started this stream. And I said to myself, you know:

 

“There is one state, there is a rogue state in the Middle East that has Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

 

And by that I mean a boatload of actual nuclear weapons. And they have the capability of targeting Britain, …

 

Natty: And if rumours are to be believed, then the Samson Option is a real thing and Israel is the lunatic state that has no compunction about using these things. Now, I don’t know if that’s a real thing or whether that’s just something that gets disseminated to scare everyone.

 

But you’ve got to remember the only people who have used nukes as an actual weapon of war against living targets is the Epstein Regime in the Second World War. And I don’t separate the people who are running America now from those people. I mean, it’s the same group of people.

 

Yuro: If you look at the way that they behave on the world stage, the way that they behave against the Palestinians, the way that they behave against the Iranians, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to just lash out at everyone else for “not defending them hard enough”. But according to the publicly available information, they have intercontinental ballistic missiles with a range of 11 and a half thousand kilometers, which basically means they can hit everywhere on the planet with the exception of kind of east Australia, New Zealand and some bits of South America.

 

Natty: So those parts of South America where all the Nazis fled to, so unfortunately they [chuckling] can’t touch them!

 

Yuro: The parts where Javier Milei, who’s converted to Judaism, is currently in charge.

 

Natty: Oh no!

 

Yuro: And they might also not be able to quite hit Mexico where (((Claudia Sheinbaum))) is in charge.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, dear! Well, talking about the control that jews wield, let’s talk about what we think is the real reason for this.

 

Now, I’m going to go straight out and say it. I believe the real reason for this is the Greater Israel Project. I think the Greater Israel Project is something that has gathered pace in the last few years, especially under Trump. We’ve seen the attacks on Gaza, we’ve seen the attacks on Lebanon. We’ve seen the fall of the Syrian regime, which was obviously heavily influenced by Israel, who were helping Islamic terrorists in the region. You know, the head chopper ones that we’re told are the great threat to peace and justice and decency, yet Israel is actually supporting those people!

 

And we’ve also seen Israel be involved in the fall of other regimes. Israel were famously involved. And this came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. I actually did a video on this. Israel were very famously involved with meeting, … And Tony Blair admitted this under oath in the Chilcot Inquiry. He met influential jewish leaders from the then current Israeli regime. And he said:

 

“The meetings had nothing to do with military intelligence. They had everything to do with overall strategy and long term goals.”

 

So take that as you will. But I’m taking that as they were heavily involved in getting rid of Saddam Hussein.

 

[22:24]

 

And I think it’s obviously within Israel’s interest to topple almost every sovereign regime in the region. And they do this quite openly. They are doing it more openly now. They’re getting away with it, sadly. And this is a blatant example of that. Although they’ve loosely talked about the nuke thing, like we said, Natty did make an important point that they felt it’s less necessary to sell this like they sold the Iraq, War. And in some interviews, members of the American regime have simply said:

 

“Yeah, we just want to kill these people. We want to kill them, we want to take them out. This is about regime change. This is about Israel.”

 

And I believe it was Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, who said:

 

“It was Israel who forced our hand. They began this and we are there to defend them and assist them. So when they began the attacks, we were forced into going along with it.”

 

Now, Trump then furiously denied this, but it’s a very interesting admission from Marco Rubio.

 

So I think this is all about the Greater Israel Project. And I believe that has been the driving force or the driving ideology behind the destabilisation of the Middle East.

 

Natty: Yeah, totally! And it kind of behooves me to say this and to get people to realise that whereas we’re living kind of day to day and prices of things go up and you’re worried about your children. We’ve been totally separated from any idea of our history and our lineage and where we’ve come from and where we might be going.

 

So it’s kind of hard to understand for us the jewish mindset. And this is a plan that’s been in the making for a very long time, years, decades, where once Israel was created and they have a vision of the Greater Israel Project. There’s a whole, there’s a list of countries. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt. And through various machinations, they’ve all been, one by one, they’ve been taken out or pacified. Egypt is basically paid off by the United States and is under the sway of Israel, has a border with Israel, but it doesn’t do anything about their genociding of the Palestinians and the destabilising and eventual collapse of the Syrian state. What happened in Libya with Gaddafi ending up with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street, and the subsequent flooding of Europe with migrants, which is a kind of side issue we can get onto if you want. But all of this, …

 

Mark Collett: I’ve got that further down the line, mate, that comes at the end, if you look at the show notes, I’ve actually said:

 

“You know, what are the actual repercussions for this, both for the West and for the Middle East?”

 

And that’s one of the things we will talk about.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. And it’s clear now, I mean, in my opinion and the opinion of other people who have been following this, that the reason Trump was so heavily pushed into a second term was that the people who are running him and the jews in Israel believe that he was the best chance of getting this done. You know, this final push to topple Iran, which basically gets rid of the last bastion of resistance to Israel. And you’ve got to think:

 

“Well, why is Israel so hell bent on getting rid of people who resist them?”

 

You think, well, the people who are opposing them, the only real people who are opposing them, committing genocide in Gaza, Europe was on board with it. The United States was supplying them with bombs and had carrier groups in the Mediterranean. The United Kingdom, our own government, was flying surveillance flights over Gaza and letting Cyprus be used as a refueling and an air base for Israel. So Europe was aiding in the genocide in Gaza.

 

And it was only Hezbollah and you know, funded via Iran that was really attacking, and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who were attacking Israel and trying to hold them account for genociding the Gazan people. And that’s unacceptable for Israel to have that resistance in the region, even though the attacks on it are totally justified and being used as like, defense against people who are being hurt and destroyed in this like, brutal way by this lunatic, lunatic group of people who have been squatting on the edge of a Mediterranean.

 

So the justifications the real justification is the toppling of Iran as a coherent state. And I’ll touch on this before I pass this over to Yuro. But there’s talk of regime change. You know, that’s what they say:

 

“We’re trying to enact regime change here.”

 

But that isn’t quite true. They’re not really interested in a regime swap where they swap one regime for another. What they’re interested in is total destabilisation! Just like with Syria, just like with Iraq, just like with Libya, where these are just failed states with tribal warlords with like Mossad and CIA run groups running around HTS, ISIS, all of these people. Which means no coherent defense, no missile bases, no civil defense, nothing! Just a load of groups that you can pay this group to fight this group and you know, you can pay these guys or stop paying these guys and just let chaos reign while Israel just expands and expands and expands and gets to do what it wants.

 

You know, kind of reminiscent, I’ll just finish on this. Kind of reminiscent to how if you import millions and millions of foreign people into a small island nation, it also becomes destabilised and coherent resistance or coherent defense or coherent politics kind of become very difficult and a very well motivated minority can rule the lot! So there’s your answer as to the real reasons for this war.

 

[28:45]

 

 

Yuro: A few things I wanted to pick up on there. Just as Mark was speaking, you kept using the term “regime”. And that’s like one of those MKUltra trigger words that they’ve put in people’s minds that like “regime is bad, regime is authoritarian, evil government”. It was all it was always the “Saddam regime” and the “Iran regime”. They’re just governments. They’re a different form of government. You know some of them are more or less Democratic than others, but it’s like this regime thing is a trigger word. And along that same lines, Natty, you mentioned the Houthis as “rebels”. I think the ones that we call Houthis are pretty much just the government of Yemen now. I mean, and they have pockets of what’s left of the people that they overthrew. But they’re basically just the government of Yemen. They’re not rebels anymore. They’re not a regime, they’re just that government.

 

But obviously this was all part of a plan. This is something that they’ve been going at for a very long time. They had the Project for a New American Century [PNAC] where they said we want to hit like seven countries in 10 years. And they’ve basically got all of them.

 

I mean, they wanted to get Iraq, they wanted to get Syria, they wanted to get Libya, and of course it’s neocon jews behind it all.

 

So that’s been happening for a very long time. There’s a reason why they caught a bunch of jewish Israelis dancing on 911*, already filming before the first plane went into those towers. They were dancing around, they were happy because they knew that was the excuse that they needed to start their own genocidal campaign. And it’s like dominoes falling. They get this one, then they get that one. And I mean, what happens to Libya? He, Gaddafi, gave up his weapons, chemical weapons and things like that.

 

[* 9/11: A false flag carried out by ZOG with Israel being the lead behind its planning and execution. The aim was to unleash the War OF Terror on the countries around Israel, among other aims. See See Also links below, especially the work by Christopher Bollyn.]

 

And as soon as they were gone, they were like:

 

“Right, well he’s defenseless, we can go in there and kill him now!”

 

So that’s what they proceeded to do.

 

And the other thing as well, like looking at what they’re doing to Iran, I mean, you talked about them wanting to destabilise them. As far as I understand, because they can’t really hit these military targets. They don’t know exactly where all the underground bases are and where they’re being launched from. So they’re targeting, I mean, apart from like primary schools for girls and things like that, which they do just because they’re evil and want to blow up kids when they’re not abusing kids in other ways, they’re just like targeting police stations and things like that. Just like blow up all the police stations in the country and hope it destabilises that way!

 

And of course they had this gayop a few weeks ago, maybe a month ago now, where they tried to incite some sort of terrorist uprising in Iran and that failed.

 

And obviously they wanted to coincide these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: But I was going to say that was obviously hilariously mistimed. [chuckling] Right? So they fermented this terrorist uprising and meanwhile they haven’t got all like the military assets in place to strike it. I mean, you might have a better idea of this than me, you guys, but maybe they thought in the January uprisings that they like funded all these terrorist groups to try and overthrow the government of Iran. Maybe they thought that it was still going to be going on now while they moved all these carrier groups and pulled their troops out of the Gulf oil state bases. Maybe they thought it was still going to be going on and that the Iran government was still going to be fighting these guys, but it was crushed within like a few days. Right!

 

Yuro: I have a feeling that maybe they were trying to like wait a little bit longer, but it was about to be compromised and they thought:

 

“If we don’t do it now, we miss the opportunity entirely.”

 

So they had to launch it. And they spent so long getting carriers into place to attack Iran because they’ve had these problems with the sewage system on the Gerald Ford, which obviously some people are saying that’s like a deliberate thing, that soldiers or sailors have clogged the tubes on purpose to destroy the system because they don’t want to go and die and be the next false flag. But they’ve had problems with that before. So it’s not entirely out of the realms of possibility that it is sort of coincidental to some degree.

 

But yeah, obviously that was something that delayed them. So I mean we can be glad about that because it’s meant that Iran’s not facing these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: I’m not sure. Look, I’m not a, like a military analyst or anything, but I’m not sure even if the like Epstein empire, the Epstein regime, had fermented this terrorist uprising whilst they carried out this first strike against Khomeini in a little girl’s school for some reason, whether if those two things occurred, coincided, even then, whether they’d have been able to pull off this kind of toppling of the regime. It seems like, …

 

Yuro: Regime?

 

Natty: Look, [chuckling] it’s the word everyone uses here! I can try, but I’m as susceptible to the MKUltra* terms as everyone else. Right? I’m just not sure it would have worked even if they had pulled it off at the same time.

 

[* MKUltra was a covert program run by the CIA from 1953 to 1973. Its primary goal was to explore methods of mind control and behavior modification through various means, including drugs and psychological techniques. MKUltra is widely condemned for its unethical practices, including: Lack of Consent: Many subjects were unaware they were part of experiments. Abusive Techniques: Included torture, isolation, and drugging without consent. The term MKUltra is a CIA cryptonym: “MK” is an arbitrary prefix standing for the Office of Technical Service and “Ultra” is an arbitrary word out of a dictionary used to name this project.]

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’re going to go on to that anyway, so let’s move a little bit further forward because there are other things we want to talk about.

 

Now, I think the next thing we need to talk about, we’ve placed this into context, talk about the Greater Israel Project. Now I think the next thing that’s very important is discussing the issue of these fake negotiations that America has had with the likes of Iran before all of this kicked off.

 

And they obviously had similar sort of fake negotiations with, I think it was Venezuela, didn’t they? And then they go in anyway. This is something that America started doing, you know, fake negotiations, but then we come and get you anyway.

 

[35:06]

 

Yuro: I think they had a similar thing with the, like Hezbollah and Hamas, didn’t they?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, there’s multiple examples.

 

But what I’m getting at is a real, and we won’t labour this because we spoke about this extensively on the Nationalist A-Team the other night, but when we were talking about that, we did make the point that fundamentally at one point the idea of going in somewhere you know, negotiating, but then using negotiations as a reason or as an excuse to then hit another country. So the negotiations aren’t real negotiations. They’re cover that gets the other side to drop their guard. So, it’s like walking up somebody in a bar saying:

 

“Look, mate, let’s just settle this amicably. Let me buy you a drink. What do you want?”

 

And when the other guy turns to have a look at the list of craft beers, you sucker punch him! You know, that’s an underhanded thing to do. Everyone would be like:

 

“Wow, that’s pretty much scandalous! We don’t want to see that kind of behaviour. That’s the kind of behaviour that’s not becoming of an honourable man.”

 

And there used to be this narrative that the West was honourable, that we were the good guys. And I’ll say these fake negotiations are being used as a means to cover up an attack which is I’m imminent. I do think that is a really shady thing to do.

 

And I think that as time goes by, we are going to see more and more people be unwilling to negotiate with the West. Like, why would Vladimir Putin or China or any other nation, North Korea, negotiate with Trump? Why would any foreign leader trust going to America or sitting in a negotiation room with the Americans when they assassinate leaders, carry out fake negotiations, use the hand of friendship to lock their opponent’s hand in place before they sucker punch them? You know, it’s like holding one hand out to shake the other guy’s hand and when he starts giving the handshake, you just sucker punch them! You know, it’s awful! I mean, what do you guys think to this?

 

I think this is going to fundamentally change the way, the implication of this, is going to change the way that every other nation does business with America. And it’ll put America on a even people like the Europeans, who are essentially vassal states of America, are not going to be trusting of Trump again or America.

 

Yuro: Well, Europe is already not going to be trusting of Trump and America because of the whole thing with Greenland for a start. But I mean, I hope at the end of this, obviously Iran’s going to hold out. They’re going to continue to resist until America and Israel, …

 

Mark Collett: This is the summation, what you hope for comes at the end, like, stay on, …

 

Yuro: It’s related to this! It’s related to this. I was going to say I hope that Israel and America run out of interceptor missiles. Iran fights them to a standstill. And they say:

 

“Right, we will negotiate with Trump in this place.”

 

He goes there to negotiate, and then, …

 

Natty: They just blow him up! [chuckling]

 

Yuro: And it would be entirely justified on moral grounds and on the grounds that it’s already been done to them.

 

Natty: They would cry bitter tears if the same tactics they had used, these same underhand, cowardly, sniveling, weak tactics were used on them! And this is something to point out to. I say I’m gonna use Boomer, but, like, Boomer mindset, Civnat, kind of Tommy Robinson-tard mindset where like:

 

“Oh, yeah, no, we’re the good guys and we should stamp these dirty terrorists into the ground! They’re terrorists!”

 

It’s like your pedo jew empire assassinates little girls for some reason, I guess because they’ve just got bloodlust and we can talk about the Purim Fest, if we want. Assassinates little girls, assassinates world leaders, which is supposed to be off the table. Totally violates, like, any notion of the Geneva Convention or the kind of rules of war and does it in a cowardly way. This is like your medieval knight marching out to the front of a battle under a white flag to negotiate terms and then just pulling a knife and stabbing the negotiator. Your entire army would be, they’re like, forfeit. And the enemy army would be totally justified in just slaughtering prisoners and like, just pillaging and doing whatever it wants at that stage! You’ve set the rules. You’re supposed to be the powerful, the one who’s setting out exactly how things are going to go down. And you open the conflict or the latest round of the conflict with an underhand cowardly assassination under the flag of truce and blowing up 170 schoolgirls! Well, I’m sorry, but what space have you now given for quarters? None! And no one’s going to trust you, and they shouldn’t trust you.

 

And the other world powers looking on Russia and China, who we’re going to touch on in a little while, like Mark said, they’re not going to be trustworthy. They’re going to have that in their minds anytime America tries to talk to them, anytime the jew empire reaches out to say:

 

“Oh, we just want to discuss the Ukraine war and negotiate terms in the Ukraine war.”

 

And like, Yuro said, they would be totally justified in shooting down like diplomatic planes, like bombing, like delegations, peace delegations, assassinating the head of state. Who’s to tell anyone now that that is a wrong or immoral thing to do now that supposedly the world police and a global superpower and the most moral army in the world, Israel, has carried out exactly that, such a thing.

 

And I don’t need to belabour the point, but they’ve been doing this for a long time. And you can look back as far as Dresden and the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan, to say:

 

“Well, that’s how these people act! And people who oppose them should act accordingly and plan accordingly.”

 

[41:35]

 

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. And not only this or not only what you guys have said, but I do think it’s very interesting that on top of everything you guys have said, there is also the issue of Russia and Zelensky.

 

Now obviously if Russia had wanted to, they could have bombed Kiev, day one of the conflict and absolutely just beheaded the regime. Now Russia never did that. Now I’m not saying Russia are the good guys or shilling for Russia, but it is an interesting comparison to see that everything that Russia has been accused of, the West has done and the West has done it in a much more sort of egregious fashion. It’s quite interesting.

 

And this so-called “Axis of Evil” now appears to be far less evil than the “good guys”. The “good guys” have shown, I said that in inverted commas. Have shown their hand. They’ve, it’s a mask off moment. I don’t know if anyone wants to add something to this because we did talk about this a lot, but I’ll give you the chance to follow up if anyone wants to talk about this.

 

Natty: Yeah, go on. Yuro, you go first.

 

Yuro: I was just gonna say it’s a complete moral inversion. It’s, we are supposedly the good guys because we fight against the bad guys. And they’re all terrorists. They’re inherently evil. I was listening to, I think this was on the Daily Shoah they were talking about basically the term “terrorist” is a social construction. It’s just a word we can use to label somebody and all of a sudden their grievances illegitimate. We don’t have to stick to the rules of engagement. We can just murder them, we can murder their families and put them in jail. We just put this label on them and they are inherently evil.

 

But you know, the Ayatollah was never in the Epstein files. That’s the difference.

 

Natty: Yeah, the Ayatollah never called me a goyim or demographically replaced my people or ethnically cleansed my people. So you know, what beef do I have with the Ayatollah, at this point? And like Mark was saying, the Russians opened Ukraine, the Ukraine conflict by striking out military targets. They were landing at Hostomel Airport and controlling like major supply routes. And the Jewpedo regime starts its war with an assassination of a leader, or a spiritual leader. Not a military strategist or anything like that. A spiritual leader who’s in his 80s as well as his granddaughter and his family members all blown up. And like blowing up a school with 12 to 17 year old school girls in it. Now you tell me, yeah, you tell me who the bad guys are.

 

Yuro: It’s worth pointing out as well that the entire war in Ukraine or although it was something that had been kind of slowly building up for a while, that NATO had been expanding further and further eastward, it was really brought to the fore because Russia was supporting Assad in Syria. And the Epstein empire had to take out Syria in order to stop Iranian weapons getting to Hezbollah and getting to Gaza.

 

And so they started this whole other conflict to take Russia’s focus away from helping their allies in Syria. And that allowed them to get in there and destroy Syria. And it’s all part of the same program.

 

Natty: The same grand strategy. Yeah, I think people, a lot of people kind of don’t seem to understand that. They’re like:

 

“Well that seems, that seems too far fetched that the Pedojew regime would start a war with Russia in Ukraine just to help topple the Syrian government. Or the Pedo jew regime would kidnap a South American president just to support an ongoing or like support a future war against Iran with oil, you know, oil routes and all the rest of it.”

 

Because people are like:

 

“No, that can’t be right, you know, 50,000 Ukrainian men dead and God knows how many Russian men dead just to tie up Russian forces to leave Syria exposed?”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how these people think. That’s what they’re willing to do.”

 

And that’s what they did do. And in Syria, Russian troops, Russian air power in Syria was halting Israeli aggression and you know, Western aggression. It was the CIA, it was MI6 and was Mossad, was paying ISIS, which has now become HTS, which is basically ISIS, to mess up Syria and mess with Assad and sanctions on Assad’s government that was turning the place inhospitable. Making it so that just to live there was pain and it wasn’t the government was obviously suffering and trying its best, but the people suffer when you put sanctions on a country. So on behest of like jewish paedophiles and Israel, America just makes people’s lives a misery around the world, everywhere! You know, Ukrainian men dead, Syrian families wiped out, little girls in Iran, hundreds of thousands of civilians everywhere, in Iraq, in Gaza, in Libya, all dead! Because jewish paedophiles just cannot get enough blood.

 

Yuro: And until the extent that they have any support for the Israeli regime in places like the UK, people in the UK who support Israel, they see this as a war against the Muslims. And they hate Muslims because of what gangs of Pakistani men do to White girls after jewish people like Peter Mandelson and his friend Tony Blair, people like that brought them to our country.

 

And it works for them both ways because it destroys the youth of the British people. It destroys our homogeneous country. It creates resentment against Muslims which they can then use and say:

 

“Well, don’t you hate the Muslims, you hate the Pakistanis who are raping children over here!”

 

[48:08]

 

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“Live vicariously as we bomb them in the Middle East. Oh, we’re getting those dirty Muslims for you know, goyim! Don’t worry, we’re bombing them. You love it, don’t you? Rah, rah, ra! Let’s go Israel! Israel’s defending you! If we weren’t fighting them here, you’d be fighting them in your streets!”

 

Well, how? Okay, thanks, Schlomo. How did they get onto my streets in the first place? Anyone fancy answer that, answering that question?

 

Mark Collett: No, that’s a very good point. Now obviously we discussed that.

 

So when we discussed the Ayatollah being killed, we’ve discussed the schoolgirls being killed. I mean, know, as you said, the paedophiles are now murdering children. And this says something about America and Israel.

 

Now, I don’t think this was an accident. I don’t think that school being hit was in any way an accident. I think they did that on purpose. I think that’s the sort of people that they are. I think they do things like this because it pleases them to do things like this. And it pleases them to do things like this because to them this is they could avoided doing this, but they don’t want to avoid doing this. What they want to do is they want to cause as much hurt and pain as possible. Now these missile systems that they have, they are probably the best missile systems in the world. They understand where they can strike and where they can’t strike. Those missiles are pretty damn accurate.

 

So when they hit a school, I think that’s by some sort of sick design. I don’t believe it’s accidental. I don’t know if you guys want to add anything to that.

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a term called “sub-metre accuracy” and I think Tomahawk missiles, I’m not sure about JDAMs, but certainly Tomahawk missiles and the types of missiles that the Jewpedo regime uses all have sub-metre accuracy.

 

So the claims about:

 

“Well, this girl school was next to a Iranian military base or something.”

 

These munitions have sub-metre accuracy, which means they can target within a metre, which is where they drop these bombs. I mean, are we supposed to pretend that the Pedojew regime is somehow like squeamish about blowing up children and civilians? A regime that goes out of its way to target hospitals and suburbs and then when it’s blown up the hospitals and suburbs, then blows up the tent cities that spring up around it to house all the refugees and injured people that you’ve just like totally displaced.

 

So these people are not squeamish about killing civilians then. They never have been. They never have been. Not for the last 70 years and probably not before that.

 

Yuro: We’re always told that we have the most advanced, precise, ultra accurate munitions. We can take out a terrorist in a crowd without killing anyone else:

 

“Oh, look, we dropped a bomb dead centre on that school. Total accident! We don’t know how it happened!”

 

Do you remember when they were attacking Gaza? I mean they’re always attacking Gaza, but in particular in the aftermath of October 7th and there were various organisations that went there to try to provide food relief and they had a car with a big logo on the top that says, “Food Kitchen”. It’s a non-governmental organisation, it’s a charity that’s bringing food to starving people in Gaza. And they sent a munition. It’s like a missile, but instead of a bomb, it’s got just like razor blades all around it.

 

And you can see the picture of the car, they sent it straight through the roof, directly on top of the driver’s seat and cut that man to bits! That’s how accurate they can be when they want to be. So they have the ability to do that they have the ability to do it. It is not an accident when they, …

 

Natty: The other interesting thing about the strike on the girls school was in the immediate aftermath, like there were shills online, there were online shills and righttoids and jews and all sorts of like scum coming out the woodwork claiming again, like they used to do in Gaza or like they have done in Gaza, that:

 

“Oh, this was an Iranian missile that kind of missed a target or misfired as they fired it out of Tehran and fell back on the girl school.”

 

Which was utterly disproved! And yet, you know, none of the people who were claiming this was like an Iranian misfire will ever be held to account or ever be made to apologise or made to like confront their lies about what this was. So the misinformation is hot and heavy.

 

But if you think, like I said, I’m going to reiterate this, if you think the Pedojew regime is squeamish about blowing up children, you’re mistaken. They’re not squeamish about blowing them up. Probably the only disappointing thing for the Pedojew regime is that these girls were blown up and didn’t have a chance to be like, sent off to Epstein’s island or something like that.

 

[53:08]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. The next thing is, this is quite interesting because it’s not the first time that Israel have admitted to bombing civilian populations. And we’ve discussed that they did it in Lebanon. They do it quite indiscriminately, they do it in Gaza.

 

But one thing’s quite interesting about these particular bombings and you guys made the point that they were bombing police stations. And I think they believe that they bombed police stations and took out government leaders and spiritual leaders, that there was going to be a revolution. And we’ve constantly heard this nonsense in the West, haven’t we? That the Iranian regime is hideously unpopular, that normal people in Iran hate the Ayatollah, they hate the government, the police, every organ of the state. I’d actually say more people in Britain hate Keir Starmer than people in Iran hate the Ayatollah.

 

But one thing that’s been very interesting is post these strikes and these indiscriminate missile attacks on schools, police stations and other sites around Tehran, we’ve seen more people out in the street supporting the Iranian government and wanting to fight back against America. I think that really underlines the fact that this idea that the Iranian people are all kept down, they have the Ayatollah’s boot on their head, this is nothing more than propaganda.

 

Natty: Oh, of course! It’s quite interesting to juxtapose it.

 

Can you imagine like a protest, or a march with hundreds of thousands of people ever coming out for any European government? I mean, the closest you got in the West was Trump, right? And that is quickly turned to ash in a lot of people’s mouths. He’s been exposed as basically just another neocon.

 

But if you put yourself in the shoes of like an Iranian, a normal Iranian citizen who’s just watched every single country where his kind of ethnic people, I know that Persians are maybe looked at differently than other people are on the Gulf states, whatever. All the other countries around him who aren’t in league with Israel have been like, brutally broken up and just left as failed states. Well, you’re going to want to cling to anything that stands up to these people and anything that resists being destroyed by them, because you know that if your government falls, that’s the end of any semblance of stability or normality you’ve got. You’re just going to have to either flee or deal with a failed state of a nation. So, of course they support it!

 

And you listen to like the BBC or Piers Morgan or some of these shows and you would think that, …

 

Mark Collett: Andrew Neil!

 

Natty: Yeah, he’s the worst! He’s a total Zio boot licker, man! I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen! [LOL] But like, you listen to these people and you’d think that every single person in Iran is just waiting, crouched behind their door, ready to rise up and take out this hugely unpopular government that everyone hates.

 

And like you said, there’s no government in Europe or anywhere in the West that is as popular with its people as the Iranian government. So take that as you will.

 

Yuro: Obviously, you know, Iran, I mean, I’m guessing, but much like most of the Middle East is awash with weapons from previous gayops and plans that we’ve had to overthrow them in the past.

 

But if you turn this around and let’s say some foreign actor blew up Parliament with every MP in it and blew up every diversity police station across the country and just dropped a bunch of weapons the chance of having a revolution would be much more likely here than it ever would be over there!

 

Natty: Yeah. And just to add on to this point, funnily enough, the strikes on Bahrain, and Bahrain’s a tiny little island nation. I mean, it used to be part of Iran. But the strikes on Bahrain look like they might actually foment a revolution because they’re kind of the Pedojew empire installed monarchy in Bahrain has lost its grip thanks to the Americans retreating and the actual people in Bahrain absolutely hate their rulers. And possibly, you know, news blackout and all the rest of it might actually foment a popular revolution in Bahrain and change governments there, [chuckling] which is supposed to be like a stronghold for the American empire and the Epstein regime and the headquarters of the Fifth Fleet, which controls the Persian Gulf or it used to control the Persian Gulf until the Pedojew regime started this war. So yeah, good one, guys. How’s it going? How’s this war going for you?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I would say that you’ve got a very good point there. And it’s a good point because we are moving on to how is this war going? Well, this is the interesting thing. Trump was elected as the guy who was going to be the President of peace and he was also elected on this America First ticket.

 

The idea that he was going to look after the average American. Now since Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, we’ve seen sort of panic buying. Oil prices have spiked. This is something that isn’t helping normal Americans who are already struggling with Trump’s idiotic tariffs.

 

And I would say, for Trump, when you actually look at, you say, how’s it going for him personally? It’s not going well domestically, but his approval ratings are at an all time low. They’re actually beneath his previous approval ratings for his first term and actually beneath Biden’s approval ratings. Now he’s getting savaged.

 

Now obviously he’s going out on TV:

 

“Oh, none of these mean anything. This is rubbish! The people love me!”

 

And I’ve spoken about this before. Post World War II don’t think any Western leader has built a cult of personality as intense as Trump has done with the MAGA movement. Trump has truly built a cult of personality where people see him as the supreme leader.

 

But I think that can be a good thing and it can be a bad thing! It’s a good thing because you have a dedicated support base. It’s a bad thing because often you become insulated and you only listen to that dedicated support base. And because you have that insulation, because you have that ring of people cheering you on and like:

 

“Up Trump! Yeah, you’re doing it right! You’re getting it right! Donald’s got it perfect! Bomb them all!”

 

You don’t actually hear the people outside of your immediate circle. And I think Trump has got this wrong. I think this is going to bring more misery on normal Americans. And I also think it could cost the Republicans the midterm.

 

[1:00:51]

 

 

Yuro: I don’t think Trump got this wrong. I think Trump did this because his handlers wanted him to do this. I mean, was it Marco Rubio who basically came out and said Israel told us they were going to attack and when they attacked, we were going to get hit in response, so we just had to join them, basically, the tail wags the dog. We had to join in. They forced our hand.

 

And of course, Trump’s all over the Epstein files. He’s part of the Epstein class. He is part of that jewish Zionist Occupied Government [ZOG]. He’s not doing it because he thinks it’s going to make him popular. He’s doing it because he is either severely compromised or that’s just his team.

 

Natty: Yeah. And to assume that Trump cares anymore, I mean, he’s not up for a third term. And if he doesn’t care, do you think the jews who are running him and the Epstein, whoever takes over from Epstein cares about Trump’s reputation or cares even less about the American people and what they want? They were just dupes who were fooled into voting for him. And you can say:

 

“Well, the 2016 Trump train.”

 

Which was a lot more based and had a lot more kind of like groundswell, Right-wing energy behind it. Well:

 

“They were tricked as well. Right?”

 

But if you fell for it again and voted for him this time, they really must despise you and just think you’re the most stupid person ever going! And it’s been proven right. I mean, Trump has now burned any credibility he’s had. This is an extremely unpopular war, but it doesn’t matter. His reputation isn’t on the line anymore, and it’s not a consideration for the people pulling his strings. They wanted this war done. Trump was their best shot of getting it done. And so they’ve got him to enact it.

 

And what we’re seeing is the fallout. And who knows where this ends? I’m sure we’re going to move on to that point. But the suffering of the American people, the suffering of European people is not any concern to these people! And you might argue that European suffering and American suffering is just a little bit of icing on their cake.

 

Yuro: This is something that they’ve wanted for decades and they’ve realised that as time’s gone on its getting less and less possible. So they’ve done it now because now is more likely than tomorrow as bad as it is and as badly as they’re doing and not winning what they want to be. If they’d waited longer, they would have had even less chance.

 

So it’s just like it’s do or die. It’s all out now because they’ve got no other choice.

 

Natty: Right. That’s what I totally agree with that.

 

And what I’m saying is the considerations that like a rational government that cared about its people would make, and there’s going to be an energy crisis, our people are going to die in this war. It’s hugely unpopular. This doesn’t benefit us in the slightest. None of that is like, none of that is in consideration. And it’s clear when you listen to people that they don’t quite understand that. And you listen to like the media class trying to justify this war and just grasping for anything.

 

Whereas like the reality, the truth, that this is purely for Israel and purely for the pedojew empire just doesn’t, it’s quite a hard pill to swallow.

 

Yuro: And as always, it’s going to affect Europe and it’s going to affect the UK so much worse than it’s going to affect America, because America has its own energy supplies.

 

Whereas, you know, Europe has been deliberately cut off from Russian energy supplies and made to not take fuel from Iran in the first place. And so Europeans are probably going to freeze this winter because of what the Americans have done or the jewish-American empire has done. Yeah.

 

Natty: Not content with cutting off via like a jewishpedo regime war with Russia. Not content with cutting off like the majority of European energy supplies. Now [chuckling] the pedojew empire now starts another war in the Gulf, which will just totally screw energy prices. And I like you guys know this, but I’m in the middle of, I’ve almost finished building my house and part of that was installing a heating system and we’ve got like a central heating system.

 

Yuro: Didn’t install a heat pump, did you?

 

Natty: We did not install a heat pump. We installed a central heating oil boiler which we needed to run up as like commissioning the system [chuckling] and like we went to fill it up the day after this started and the price of central heating oil was like 63 per litre. And the day after this thing started and Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, it went up by like 33 P per litre and it’s now at like 1 pound 33 a litre. So I know this isn’t funny because this is going to affect everyone, but it’s like these are real effects and no the people who started this war just don’t care about this. You haven’t felt this at the pumps yet, but my God, like you are going to and the whole of Europe is going to, so.

 

[1:06:19]

 

Yuro: And it will be White pensioners who freeze whilst illegal migrants can turn up the heating as much as they want in hotels and non-Whites all over will get preferential benefits and help to make sure that they’re looked after while our people suffer.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean that’s a given at this point.

 

But yeah, we’re about to be hit with this thing. I mean, unless it wraps up quickly, which is not going to happen.

 

Yuro: Even if it did wrap up tomorrow, we’d still have the price shocks. I mean this is what always happens when there’s a, like the price of oil shoots up, petrol prices shoot up, the price, …

 

Natty: Two days for it to rise. 106. Yeah, six weeks for it to creep its way back down. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: They’re very interesting points and obviously it sort of goes into what we said before about Venezuela. It puts everything into context.

 

Now one of the things that he’s really. We’re going to talk a bit about the fight back here and what Iran has done, its retaliatory strikes, but one of the most disappointing things is they talk about this Axis of Evil, but so far Russia have condemned this. I’m not sure what China have said, if anything at all, but there’s largely a wave of silence about this, isn’t there? There isn’t sort of the international, … So when Russia started their, in inverted commas. They’re not my words, but their words, “the Special Military Operation”, you know, there was this wave of condemnation from every European country about the invasion of Ukraine.

 

However, here, this so-called “Axis of Evil”, China, Russia, etc, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of pushback other than a couple of snappy press statements.

 

And I think this does tell you something about Russia and China’s ability or readiness to get involved. Now I would say China is more concerned with potentially taking Taiwan. And the knock on effects of this is, well, China will look and say:

 

“If America can take out the leadership of countries they don’t like, why can’t we do the same to Taiwan?”

 

And I think Russia is still tied up in Ukraine, which is probably by design. I think part of the issue with Ukraine was pulling Russia so deep into Ukraine that it depleted their resources in places like Syria. So regimes did fall in areas that America wanted them, America and Israel wanted them to fall.

 

But what do you think about the lack of sort of international pushback on this?

 

Yuro: It’s obvious that the Chinese and Russians are helping the Iranians in terms of intelligence gathering, satellite imagery. Supposedly the Iranian missiles use like an encrypted Chinese GPS as opposed to the American run satellites.

 

But yeah, they’re not coming out and publicly saying a lot and they could be doing a lot more kind of out in the open. And if they were really serious, the Chinese and Russians could help the Iranians develop an actual nuclear weapon to allow them to have a deterrent to defend themselves. And that could have happened, you know, within the last decade, but we don’t see them doing it.

 

Natty: Well, I made this point to mark the other day. This is where I kind of disagree with you a little bit. I think there’s only so much they can do. And Russia can’t just import a nuke into Tehran or into Iran without them asking for it. And if you’ve been paying attention, …

 

Yuro: Well, they should ask for it then!

 

Natty: Well that’s, maybe you’re right and they probably should and they probably will if they ever, if they get through this thing in one piece. But Russia has to be asked to provide that nuke. And the Ayatollah, Ayatollah Khomeini has famously had a fatwa on acquiring nuclear weapons. Which, you know, looking back to how we opened this thing puts lie to the fact that:

 

“Iran is two weeks away from having a nuke. Iran is five weeks away from having a nuke!”

 

For the last 30 years, every couple of weeks. So for one, Iran has to ask these countries for things. And I’m fairly certain that Russia is providing military assistance. You know, maybe not flashy supersonic missiles and all the rest of it, but you know it’s a short hop across the Caspian Sea for Russia to send boats and send equipment down to Tehran as much as it can. Like you said, Mark, they’re tied up in Ukraine as per the pedojew regime’s plan.

 

And like you said, Yuro. They’re using encrypted Chinese satellite data for their missiles. And I’m sure, like satellite imagery of the surrounding Gulf states and areas that Iranian like ballistic missiles and drones are hitting is provided by the Chinese.

 

So I think Russia and China understand the stakes here and understand that if Iran falls or we’re kind of at a turning point in history of the future of the Pedojew regime empire and where it stands and if it manages to pull this off and destroy Iran, then who knows what’s next? And we, I guess, we can talk about that. But for Russia and China, they probably think that actually halting the Pedojew regime here is probably a good thing to do.

 

And as much as much as they can do under the table, they’re going to do. And if it gets any hotter than that, well, who knows? But I disagree with you that they’re not helping as much as they could be.

 

Yuro: I don’t expect them to hand over a dozen nuclear weapons and say:

 

“Here you go!”

 

But why is Iran using such an antiquated air force instead of more modern Russian fighter planes, for example? Like, things like that would not be outside of the realm of possibility.

 

[1:12:38]

 

Natty: Well, because that’s not where the Iranian like, national defense has been focused. America, whatever you like to say about it, dominates the air and it always has. It has the most advanced and the most aeroplanes that it can put in the sky. You know, carrier groups all over the place, air bases all over the place. And Iran has had a long time to prepare for this. They’ve watched what’s happened around them and has decided actually our best national defense is in this missile capability and drone capability. And if Russia sent a squadron of like Su-22s or whatever the latest MIGs are, they would probably be shot down in fairly short order, which would be waste of resources.

 

So I think this idea, like I said, I think this idea that they’re not helping as much as they can is misplaced.

 

And interestingly enough, Arab Natsoc in the chat has just said Iran has a hyper fixation on self sufficiency. And he says it’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

 

And I think that’s probably correct. Like I said it’s not up to China and Russia just to unload the docks in some port somewhere. Just tons and tons of military hardware that Iran never asked for. You know, they’ve got to agree these things and they’ve got to ask for it and they’ve got to trade for it and give things away and they probably feel they don’t need to. And judging by what’s happening so far, maybe they’re right. They didn’t need it. Maybe whatever they’ve asked for, they’re utilising and anything they haven’t asked for, they don’t really need.

 

Yuro: [with a Russian accent]

 

“I’m sorry, comrade, I didn’t mean to leave that pallet of nuclear weapons. You can do what you like with them.”

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, [chuckling] I did say this in all fairness, mate, I think I did say to you it would probably, to do something like this or to create a deal of that sort you would probably actually need for the Iranian regime to fundamentally turn around and say:

 

“Look, you’re gonna have half of our country, you’re gonna have X amount of our oil production. You’re going to be able to put your own bases on our soil. You’re going to have this power over us.”

 

And then Russia or China might say:

 

“Well, this is actually worth it. Then we will put bases on your soil. This is absolutely worth it! We’re going for it. Thanks. Thanks a bunch, guys. You know, this works.”

 

But the Iranians might not actually want that they might not actually want Russia and China to have that much control over Iranian politics.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s absolutely right!

 

And if you think about it, that would turn Iran into a, like a, not exactly a vassal state, but as a, like an arm of Russia or an arm of China.

 

Whereas if they come out of this unscathed, they emerge as the regional power in the Middle East, which has much bigger implications for them and then makes them bigger on the world stage than just being an outpost of Russia or China.

 

Yuro: But they could trade on more equal terms with the North Koreans. And the North Koreans have come out and said:

 

“If they ask for a nuke, they’ll get one.”

 

Natty: Well maybe they will. I suspect the Iranian government is going to be much more looking at that idea much more favourably after this.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that is an interesting point.

 

And ultimately I’ve said this on many streams, but we are in a situation where that is the only way that you can keep America off your back. That’s the only reason North Korea didn’t fall. It’s the only reason Russia probably hasn’t been invaded or struck by the Americans. I think if Russia didn’t have nukes, undoubtedly America would have attacked them.

 

But despite them not having nukes, I will say this. I think the Iranians retaliatory strikes have been extremely impressive! But amongst those retaliatory strikes, it is noted that, because when this all started, I was thinking:

 

“Why are they bombing refineries? Why are they attacking refineries in other Arab nations? Surely that’s going to annoy potential allies. Why would they do such a thing? You know, we don’t do that, guys, because if you do, you’re going to end up being a pariah state and you know, your next door neighbours aren’t going to want to essentially work with you.”

 

And then the other day it comes out that effectively what you’re seeing here is not Iran striking these oil refineries, but the strikes on the oil refineries have been carried out by Israel!

 

So what do you think to Iran’s actual retaliation and what do you think of Israel’s rather underhanded attacks? Because, and this isn’t just theory crafting. We’ve actually seen over the last, 24 hours scores of Mossad agents being arrested around the Middle East for being involved in false flag operations in numerous Middle Eastern nations.

 

And of course, this is something that we all know happens. This is something that we all are completely aware of you know, we know that Israel is regularly involved in sort of false flag events. This is something that has happened many, many times in the past.

 

And I think it’s interesting that this is being exposed. So we’ve had the USS Liberty, [we’ve had 9/11] we’ve had bombings in the Middle East. We’ve had potential or we’ve had sort of “terror attacks” in inverted commas in numerous countries which have turned out to be the work of Israeli agents. And we’re seeing that again now.

 

So I think Iran has performed far more ably than people might have thought. Sadly, they don’t seem to be winning this. Their navy seems to be taking major hits.

 

But some of these retaliatory strikes are looking questionable, are actually the work of Israel.

 

[1:19:06]

 

 

Yuro: Well, supposedly, I mean, who’s to say that the attack on our base in Cyprus was actually carried out by Iran? Because didn’t Keir Starmer say:

 

“Oh, we won’t actually engage in hostile actions, we’ll only defend Israel with our planes!”

 

Which is, of course, kind of a schizophrenic point of view in the first place. But then all of a sudden:

 

“Oh, look, our base in Cyprus is attacked and now we can kind of get in fully without restriction.”

 

Natty: So that’s a good point. I mean, we can talk about RAF Akrotiri, but if you look at where Cyprus is on a map, any Iranian weapons, munitions, whether it’s drones or missiles or whatever, have to fly over, like directly over Israel. So there’s speculation it was like Hezbollah or possibly someone else or even maybe a, like an Israeli false flag, which is certainly possible. And who can say?

 

But it does seem like the refineries in Saudi Arabia and Qatar are Mossad operations to blow them up. With the point being to try and engage those countries on behalf of Israel to come into the war on behalf of Israel and do what they can or do more for Israel.

 

But coming back to your point, Mark, about the strikes that Iran have carried out, it’s not clear to me that they’re losing. I mean, you say it seems they’re losing. I’m not sure that’s totally true. And we spoke about this before I think a few months back on the Nationalist A-Team, where I think they’re doing much more, they’re doing a much more capable job than anyone except expected them to in the sensibility and where they’re striking.

 

So they’re hitting US bases in these Gulf oil states, you know, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And they’re forcing the Americans to retreat, which stretches their logistic lines. And like we said earlier, they may have fomented an uprising in Bahrain and they’re making these Arab states which have been paid off or controlled by Israel in some way unstable and shaky. And the Israeli installed governments and monarchs and regimes in these countries are looking incredibly shaky or shaky as you’ve just put in the chat, that you’re on shaky ground. And hitting Dubai, well, that’s just popular with everyone in the entire world. So what do you say about that?

 

Yuro: It’s kind of, it’s almost like their own kind of Samson Option, except inherently justified and not evil because they’re only going after the American bases and the people supporting the Americans and the Israelis.

 

But you know, they’ve said:

 

“If we’re attacked from here. We’re going to take this, and just kind of everything in the region, every American base.”

 

And it’s entirely justified because these countries can’t claim to be not involved:

 

“Oh yes, we’re not involved in this. We just have a base where your enemy is launching attacks on you, but we’re not involved!”

 

And then the moment Iran says:

 

“Okay, well we’re not going to attack you, we’re not going to attack your people, but we’ll take out that base.”

 

And then say Saudi Arabia:

 

“So we’re under attack, we’re being attacked.”

 

Well, no!

 

Natty: That’s American soil. That’s American soil there buddy! A totally legitimate target by anyone’s standards.

 

Yuro: I mean, it seems like Iran is taking a kind of “tank and turtle” strategy. You know, it’s like when you play a, like a strategy game and you can put a lot into units or you can just build up your base and wait for them to come to you. And it can be risky because there’s a possibility that you get overwhelmed.

 

But if you’re turtle enough you can withstand that storm and then you can turn around.

 

Mark Collett: Is Yuro the tank or the turtle? That’s the question. [chuckling]

 

Natty: Depends what he’s had to eat. [chuckling]

 

Yuro: Turtling and tanking, kind of the same thing.

 

Natty: But I think like Iran by its like geography is kind of is able to naturally turtle and the fact is that there’s so many assets that America have placed around it and like the jewpedo regime have around it. And the fact that Israel is within striking distance means it can strike effectively. And America is very powerful and has a very powerful military, but that military still has logistical concerns and still has aircraft carriers that are clogged [chuckling] with like fat Mexican sailors poo!

 

Yuro: American aircraft carriers are as full of shit as Donald Trump!

 

Natty: Well, [chuckling] yeah, agreed.

 

Mark Collett: Well that’s the thing. Look, I mean, we haven’t seen an aircraft carrier at the bottom of the Persian Gulf yet, have we? Now you might be saying:

 

“Oh well, Mark, that’s a big ask.”

 

Because Obviously, if that happened, we would actually probably see the beginning of World War III! Because at that point, I think Trump would have to put boots on the ground. It actually might be the end of him. You know, it’d be one of the other, wouldn’t it? He’d either have to put boots on the ground or it’d be the end of him. But we are yet to see an aircraft carrier effectively being scrapped.

 

Now, that doesn’t mean they’re not doing anything in retaliation, but they’re not hitting the big targets. And look, we’ve had American commentators, some of these American commentators that do these sort of big takes on these things. You hear them talking about this Axis of Resistance and saying:

 

“Oh the time will come when these hypersonic missiles are going to be putting aircraft carriers at the bottom of the Persian Gulf!”

 

We yet to see that, are we? I mean, we’re also yet to see any of these sort of hypersonic super weapons take out leading members of the Israeli government or the Israeli regime. You know, I know Yuro doesn’t like the word “regime”, which we keep using, but that is an interesting point. We haven’t seen Israel struck. Israel has been proved to be not invincible, I think it’s fair to say that. But we haven’t seen the Israeli government reeling in the same way that the Iranian government has.

 

[1:25:49]

 

Yuro: Well, there’s a couple of points to make here. First off, with regards to the aircraft carriers, the American Navy has been keeping the aircraft carriers at a much greater range than they would normally use them to attack somebody because they are scared of those missiles. And the Iranians have launched small salvos of kind of like four missiles at time at them and got them to basically back off and back off to a greater distance, which means they can do much fewer kind of bombing runs at once and they have more fuel requirements and greater maintenance on the planes. So it is diminishing America’s capability to attack.

 

There was also satellite footage, I think, from a Chinese satellite that showed a fire on one of the destroyers in one of the aircraft carriers escorts. So potentially that was hit by Iranian missiles and although not sunk, caught fire. So they’re keeping them at bay. The Americans know if they get any closer, they will be hit.

 

And with regards to the missiles that they’re firing, it seems like they’ve used a lot of their kind of crappier munitions and their older munitions, like everything they’ve been launching at the other Gulf states is short range ballistic missiles that don’t have the range to go anywhere else. So they might as well use them on these targets. And they’ve been using up these older, less advanced munitions and drones and still still getting so many interceptors wasted before they actually bring out the big guns. And we’ve seen within the past day or two they’re starting to launch these missiles. I can’t remember the name of them, but they’re like a very large cluster munition that drops about 60 different submunitions on the way down and they’re dropping those on Israel.

 

And as I said in the very beginning, we just don’t know how much is actually getting through and how much damage they’re actually doing because it’s censored and covered up.

 

Natty: Yeah, we did touch on this and like you said, like an interceptor system, like a THAAD or like a Patriot battery or whatever, costs like in the millions, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars. And they’re being used up [chuckling] like drones with lawnmower engines and like a few kilogram warheads. And Iran’s just like churning these things out, like churning them out and churning them out and they’re still intact and they’re at some point America is going to run out of interceptors.

 

And I don’t know if you saw this, but the pedojew regime in America like called its defense manufacturers, heads of its defense manufacturing industry in for like an emergency meeting to say:

 

“We need more missiles! We need more stuff like come on, make it happen!”

 

But I was listening to something earlier saying this is very well demanding that, but there’s a lot of a very expensive gear that goes into this stuff, like certain gases and certain rare earth elements and guidance systems and radio radar systems and optics and all the rest of it that has to go into this missile production.

 

Meanwhile, you know, Iran can get like a cheap [chuckling] Chinese lawnmower engine, stick it in a, like a fiberglass Shahed drone shell, put a bit of explosive on the tip of it and just launch it wherever it runs, you know, within a few hundred mile radius, which is enough to cover the Gulf states and Strait of Hormuz and all this oil production that Europe relies on and lots of other people rely on and it’s going to destabilise all these countries that surround it.

 

Yuro: There’s a psychological aspect of them just doing the drip, drip, drip, dropping wave after wave of missiles on the Israelis, that’s definitely going to be wearing the Israelis down.

 

And also let’s say they absolutely opened up and dropped every missile that they had on Tel Aviv and the surrounding areas. Well in that situation the Israelis would come out and enact the Samson Option, wouldn’t they? And just you know, destroy them with their own nuclear weapons so that obviously they’re not going to feel like they can just drop everything on them at once because they don’t want to force them into that corner where they say:

 

“All right, well we’re doomed anyway!”

 

Natty: Well the other thing to remember is for Iran, the people in Iran and the government in Iran understands this is like a fight for survival. Like I said earlier, if they lose now, if they fail in this defense of their nation, they turn into a failed state. Israel has free reign and MI6 and the CIA have free reign to just fund all sorts of horrible like disgusting groups like ISIS and like the Kurds and everyone else to come and storm their country and make it into a living hellhole, just like they’ve done with Syria and Iraq and Libya.

 

So they understand this is a fight for their survival. So they’ve got to bend their entire will to doing this. Israel and America can stop anytime and can be forced to their knees if their civilian populations demand it. You know dropping cluster munitions on Tel Aviv is like a terror tactic. Well I mean “terror” in like air quotes, right? But at some point the Israeli people, the jews in Israel were going to have had enough of air raid sirens and cluster munitions raining on their heads and could be going to demand that it ends one way or another.

 

And this is what happened in the 12 Day War. I mean if you listen to shills and like pedojew media you would think that Iran lost a 12 day war, but it was Israel who cried off, who’d taken enough punishment from everything I can see. And it’s only a matter of time. I mean if Iran can sustain what it’s doing the Iron Dome is not stopping a giant like cluster warhead that like you said drops 60 submunitions on the city in a suburb somewhere, they’re going to cry uncle and they’re going to bend the knee to Iran.

 

[1:32:14]

 

Meanwhile Iran can’t stop and it simply can’t otherwise it fails. And I’m sure almost everyone in the country understands that.

 

Yuro: This is like a boxing match where the other side controls the bell. You know, you’ve got Mike Tyson there and he’s got the bell. He chooses when the match ends. You don’t want to give it everything you’ve got and gas out too early because it might go on another five minutes.

 

So they are happy to let this draw out. And everything that the Americans and the Israelis has done has all been about, let’s go in there with the alpha strike, let’s drop as much on them as we can, let’s take out this, let’s take out that, and then we’ll just walk away and say:

 

“Mission successful, we can walk away now.”

 

And the Iranians are like:

 

“No, we’re not surrendering! We’re going to keep on fighting!”

 

Because as time continues it gets more and more in their favour. What they don’t want to do is say:

 

“Right let’s have a ceasefire!”

 

And three months, six months down the line, it starts all over again. They’re better off just continuing it now.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree with that.

 

I mean, this is, like I said, this is a long, long time in the making. This is a long term plan of Israel’s to destroy and destabilise Iran. So if there’s ever, if there’s a ceasefire, if this stops, it’s going to be back on again at some point. And in the same way that a Gaza ceasefire isn’t really a ceasefire and at some point Israel is going to move on Gaza again and try and wipe those people out. So I think the Iranians understand that. Well, hopefully they understand that.

 

So we’ll see what happens.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is interesting because they haven’t begged, have they haven’t begged and they haven’t cucked! I think they know there is no negotiations. That’s one of the big problems earlier that we talked about though. You know, when you make it so negotiation is meaningless, you essentially do put people with their backs to the wall. You know, if you’ve got a guy, you know, stood in his house with a pistol and the police are like:

 

“Look, let’s negotiate.”

 

But you know that when the police come through that door, they’re going to shoot you no matter what. At that point, what are you going to do? Is it going to be fight to the death, blaze of glory time, or is it going to be:

 

“Well, I’ll spend 12 hours negotiating only to be shot in the head anyway.”

 

At that point, you are creating an interesting sort of situation where fundamentally the American word is good for nothing! And the only answer is to fight to the death. And look, you know, without going into World War II, many, many Germans surrendered in good faith, believing that they were going to be treated like human beings, that they were going to be treated honourably, that surrendering to the Americans would be the right thing, that they would go home, that they would be treated as prisoners of war. And then they were brutalised and starved to death. I mean, surrendering to America is often, …

 

Natty: Or sent to Russia as slaves.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Natty: Even starved on the banks of the Rhine or sent to Russia as slaves. Yeah, you shouldn’t imagine that you’re going to be treated fairly if you surrender to these people. They’ve shown, as we discussed earlier, they’ve shown that they’ve got no honour. They’ve shown that they’re dishonourable people and they don’t treat civilians well. Those are the lessons that should be taken from this.

 

Yuro: They protest for their right to rape captives. When their own people have been caught on video, you know, sodomizing prisoners like Gazans that they’ve captured, they protest. And they don’t say it didn’t happen

 

Natty: Out in the street.

 

Yuro: Yeah, they said they turn out in the street to protest and say:

 

“We should be allowed to sodomize them!”

 

Is there any other country in the world where you would get that?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think one of the interesting things about Trump, and this is sort of just one of my sort of notes on this, is that Trump came in as this “art of the deal”, wanting to put world peace on the table, get America out of the foreign wars that have dogged it for some time. And essentially what we’ve actually seen is quite the opposite. Trump actually does seem to be. And this isn’t meant to be a compliment, by the way, but it probably comes off as a little bit of a compliment. But he does seem to be sort of the ultimate ZOG warlord, doesn’t he? Trump as a guy, as a mad sort of emperor stood, you know, addressing his troops does seem to be a role that he slips into far more easily and readily than the role of peacemaker.

 

Now, I’ve seen him in these interviews. I’ve seen him talking about future operations. I’ve seen the way he really does love having this power and being able to tell other nations to bow to him or else. And that’s what he’s saying, really, with Iran:

 

“You’ll do what I say or I’m going to completely raze you to the ground!”

 

Now saying that, do you think there has ever been a more philo-semitic president? And following this, do you think this will change the way Americans vote in the future?

 

[1:37:45]

 

 

Natty: I doubt it. And there may have been more philo-semitic presidents, but certainly not in our time, or I mean, our time is in a time when I’ve been a, like an adult. I think I was 12 at the time when the first Gulf War started, when Bush rolled into Iraq and dragged Blair in and dragged the rest of the British people in. But it’s hard to imagine a more philo-semitic president.

 

And I think part of the problem is. Well, maybe it’s not a problem for them, although it might turn out to be, who knows, depending on how this thing goes, is that more and more people were just nakedly seeing it as that it’s like, why, what possible reason could the American people, like the people in America have for engaging in this terminal war with Iran? What possible cause do the British people have against the people of Iran? You know, flimsy excuses like:

 

“Oh, they’re a terrorist nation and you know, they might at some point have a nuke!”

 

This just doesn’t cut it. This isn’t a reason that sensible people would launch wars against people and go on these destructive campaigns against people.

 

Yuro: Sunni Pakistanis rape children. So we need to fight against them

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“We need to fight a Shia country, a Persian Shia country!”

 

Yeah, absolute lunacy! But people, I think people genuinely understand more now. But this is just jews! This is a war for jews. It’s a war for Israel. And Trump is like deeply, deeply friends with the jewish paedophile who was the mover and shaker for the evil jewish paedophile regime. This is their guy. You know, he is their guy and he’s the guy who’s going to see this done. Not for you, not for your family, not for the American infrastructure, not for the home country and what it means for the future of America, but for Israel and for his jewish handlers. And people, I think, understand that. More and more people understand that, which is why this war is so unpopular.

 

Yuro: We see more and more people waking up to jewish power every day. And in America, I mean, you see mainstream Leftists like Ana Kasparian from the young Turks goes out and just says:

 

“The goyim are waking up! Deal with it!”

 

And that’s amazing to see and it’s a great thing! But at the end of the day there’s no one for them to vote for. The two party system in America is so entrenched, they’re not going to have that option anytime soon to actually get out of it. I mean you’re just going to have a continuation of the same thing where you have presidents get elected and have lower and lower approval ratings, but the people just won’t believe it.

 

Natty: And that’s like you said, no other choice. And I’ll remind, you know, Mark was saying that President Trump ran on like a “no foreign intervention, no foreign wars” ticket. Certainly in 2016 he did. But every president has done that and most of the prime ministers and most of the regimes in this country have run on the same kind of, “we’re not for foreign wars”!

 

And yet every time there’s a foreign war on behalf of Israel and the jews, these people snap to. And all of a sudden it’s:

 

“Well, this war is justified. And this is a terrorist regime and Syria used Sarin gas on its people and Iran is a terrorist state and Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

So these people know that foreign wars aren’t popular and you know, foreign wars within justifications, but foreign wars where there is literally no justification apart from the jews want us to do this, are extremely unpopular! And burn through the veil that these people use to hide what they do and kind of hide the levers they pull in order to get what they want.

 

Mark Collett: That’s very interesting. And I do concur. I don’t think there is anyone else to vote for. But I’m not really here to correct anyone tonight. I think everyone’s made excellent points, but you are actually wrong that it was just, 2016. There are pictures floating around that I’ve actually shared showing with Trump and Vance stood together and it’s the kind of text around them is “the peace ticket”, you know, saying:

 

“You’re voting first, you’re voting for peace!”

 

This is what they ran on this time as well. And Trump did make these huge sort of overtures to the Nobel Committee, that he wanted the Nobel Prize Peace Prize, that he was going to stop these wars, which obviously he hasn’t done.

 

Natty: I think I’m probably guilty of paying less attention to the Trump campaign in 2022, [chuckling] when it was in 2016. But, yeah, I can well believe it. And I’ve heard, I’ve seen that in headlines, quoted for the peace ticket. And Trump lambasting Obama on Twitter at the time, saying:

 

“Oh, Obama’s going to start a war in Iran because he’s such a terrible negotiator and he sucks at being a peaceful president.”

 

And it’s like, yeah so many years later, you’re the guy. You’re the guy these people have activated to get this done.

 

[1:43:07]

 

Mark Collett: Well, indeed. And the next point, because we’re sort of getting towards what do we think’s going to happen?

 

But before we do that, I think one of the interesting things about this is we’ve seen, so there are a lot of, what can I call them, “Shitbag influencers” like Tommy Robinson, Douglas Murray, Andrew Neil. I despise Andrew Neil! Fat, worthless toad! The day he has sort of a gigantic Coronary as he sat eating his sort of duck pate on his terrace in the south of France will be a good day for the world! That guy is always on the wrong side of everything. He wants to attack Iran, wanted all the Covid restrictions. I can’t remember him ever saying anything good. He is scum of the earth!

 

But on the other side, we have seen this in interesting bipartisan pushback. We’ve seen Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Ana Kasparian. There has been this mass awakening to Israel! I mean, Tucker Carlson stood in front of Turning Point USA getting a standing ovation for saying:

 

“Israel needs to get out of American politics!”

 

That is seismic. You know, he is still the biggest American political voice in terms of being an influencer. I think this is incredible!

 

Now, I was somebody that was quite happy for Trump to get in for a couple of reasons, but one of the reasons being that I believed that this would bring things to a head. I believe that the Trump regime would be the regime that accelerated things to a point where numerous people who had previously been extremely philo-semitic would end up coming out, breaking ranks, and there would be a mainstream acceptance of our points. I remember saying that, actually I was briefly invited on WarStrike, of all streams, the night of the election.

 

And I was like:

 

“Look, this isn’t a bad thing! Don’t have a cow over this basically. This is something that may well bring us certain benefits.”

 

And I think that we are sort of seeing this to a large degree now. What do you guys think about this? Because I can’t really remember the last time we’ve actually seen a such a bipartisan move against Israel. And it’s not just the ones I’ve mentioned. I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been incredible! Tucker Carlson’s leading the charge with young Right-wing males and females. Turning Point USA, which used to be absolutely ZOGged, is now a hive of like counter-semitism, if you like.

 

And on top of all of that, having the absolutely delightful and wife ready material known as Ana Kasparian.

 

Yuro: She’s absolutely perfect! [chuckling] Coming out for me!

 

Mark Collett: What? What did you say Yuro?

 

Natty: What did you say?

 

Yuro: It’s a bit brown for me.

 

Natty: Get out! Booted from this stream!

 

Mark Collett: You know what? Do you know what? Yuro’s got this thing, right, where you show any girl who’s got the mildest amount of than, and he goes into some kind of like tail spin as if like White women have never ever set foot out of the house!

 

Yuro: Are Armenians White?

 

Natty: This one is. This one certainly is!

 

Yuro: If she’s anti-semitic, she’s White! Okay.

 

Mark Collett: The question is, Yuro, are you White? [chuckling] Because the fact you’ve asked this of our lady in chief, …

 

Natty: Perfect Queen.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a perfect Queen means maybe you’re, …

 

Yuro: I’m not as big as simp as you are mate!

 

Mark Collett: Mate, there’s nothing simpy about loving Ana!

 

Natty: It’s [chuckling] a justified simpery.

 

Mark Collett: It’s justified simpery. Yeah. And so why I like Ana as well is when she gets angry, she just doesn’t hold back, does she? She’s one of those people, sometimes watching somebody get really angry, …

 

Natty: There was a clip, there was a clip of her on Piers Morgan and she was like yelling at these like jews. There were like six of them on the panel and I think they were all jews apart from her and Piers Morgan. And she’s like yelling and screaming at them because they’re trying to dissemble and you know, do what “aboutery” about the killing in Gaza and the killing kids in Iran and stuff. And she’s really letting them have it! And she’s screaming at them. There was some like Boomer in the Facebook comments, like:

 

“Oh, I tried to watch it but I couldn’t take the screeching!”

 

I just, I put underneath it, I was like:

 

“I would listen to her scream about jews in my ear all night!”

 

Mark Collett: Look, [chuckling] that is how I feel that like she has come out and when she does it? She does it! So if you’re screaming like some mad, sort of disheveled, for want of a better term, “Karen” and so you’re sort of mad because there was only, …

 

Yuro: Karen is a slur.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is, but Karen can also, you know what I mean? You get some women who’ll go crackers over like the fact there’s only seven olives in there, you know, olive pasta. And the menu shows eight or something and they throw an absolute fit over it! But the way she blows up, it’s so attractive. She’s like:

 

“Don’t give me this! You disgusting Zionist pig! You make me sick!”

 

And she’s enunciating every one of her words and she’s not holding back either. She’s like:

 

“You child killing monsters!”

 

Natty: It’s like righteous fury at the people she’s like, that’s been put up on these panel shows.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. Exactly! And when you’re watching it’s extremely attractive! It’s not sort of like I said, I know “Karen” is a bit of an anti-White slur, but it’s not Karen-esque. It’s not like an overly liberal White woman and who’s outraged because of something minor that normal people are like:

 

“Look, just pull yourself together.”

 

The way she does it, I find it to be absolutely cracking! I love it!

 

Anyway, that’s enough glazing of Ana Kasparian. I mean, look, can there ever be enough glazing about the Kasparian? That could be a two hour stream in itself!

 

[1:49:33]

 

 

Natty: It’s for Yuro, apparently. I mean, Yuro’s not on the Kasparian train here, unfortunately. Maybe we’ll have to have a word with [word unclear] after the stream.

 

Mark Collett: We have to, … You mean a beating? [chuckling]

 

Natty: You’re going to a re-education camp.

 

Mark Collett: After the show in the green room, we give him a kicking!

 

So what do you think of this bipartisan movement, though? I find it refreshing. I like it. And it’s got real gravitas. Because, look, I was on the David Duke show earlier and obviously I work with David probably more than anybody else in the world, for better or worse. And I love David! He’s a real character. He can be a bit difficult at times, but he’s a real character. But sadly, David does not have the influence he once had.

 

And I’m not saying that to sort of mock David or deride David. I’m just saying that as a statement of fact. But somebody like Ana Kasparian does have that power! She does have that gravitas, but so does Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. You know, Tucker Carlson. Absolutely massive! And you’re watching these people tear in to the Zionist cause and attack these Warhawk jews. It is very refreshing! I mean, well, for me, it is anyway. I mean, I don’t know about you guys, but I love it!

 

I mean, how does this make you feel after all the years of being in the wilderness? Look, being in the wilderness is something that. I am still very much in the wilderness, despite all my hard work over the years, despite my incredible consistency. Like, if I’m not the perfect guy, okay, not by a long, long means, I am very good at debates, but I’m not the perfect guy. I have my foibles. I screw up, …

 

Yuro: Not good at controlling your temper.

 

Mark Collett: I was gonna joke there by exploding at you!

 

Natty: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: I’m not brilliant at controlling my temper, but one thing you’ve got to say for me is that throughout all these years, I have been extremely consistent in what I’ve stood for.

 

Now, when it comes down to it, seeing these people, for me, anyway, come out and be sort of so, you know, completely anti-Israel. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen it. And it’s not just relying on, as I said, this isn’t to knock David, but it’s not just to rely on me and David Duke making the point anymore. You know, these points are being made by these more mainstream individuals who’ve got serious gravitas. And I actually like that. I think it’s something that I think is really important. Seeing Ana Kasparian and seeing all these others doing it. I think this has taken our message to a new crowd. And it’s interesting to see that there are people all over the political system who have had enough of Israel.

 

Natty: Yeah. And I think having this kind of, it’s not perfect. The things they say aren’t perfect. Right. And the problem isn’t just Israel. And I think most people get that. And this isn’t to kind of pee on your cornflakes, Mark. But even the things they’re saying do give amount of headroom for anyone who’s less sizable and less influential from them to kind of push those boundaries a little bit more. And there is further to push.

 

I mean, we shouldn’t be coming around the campfire at this stage to stretch your wilderness analogy. We should be trying to, we should still be in the wilderness telling the truth and putting the final truth to it. Because, like I said the things are saying are anti-Israel, which is like 90% of the way there, right?

 

And like I said, giving headroom for more, not extreme, that’s not the word, but for a greater and more deep understanding to come forth.

 

And I think that you are going to see from this war with Iran, you’re going to see a tranche of politicians and people emerge who are willing to say these things. And sure, amongst those people there are going to be shills and they’re going to be subversive people, but at some point it just becomes like a political football whether you support Israel and whether you’re going to do their bidding.

 

I mean, one of the disappointing things with Rupert Lowe is he hasn’t really come out against, he hasn’t made a statement against Israel, which I’m sure none of us really expect, but now would be the perfect time for someone in his position to make that leap. We haven’t seen it yet, but I think this just pushes that football a little bit further down the road. You know, pushes the can a little bit further down the road to give space for that to happen.

 

Yuro: I think every day that the Rupert Lowe goes out and doesn’t support Israel, even if he won’t explicitly say that he’s against them, obviously that’s giving us room and whatnot.

 

But another thing, sort of talking about, obviously, the goyim waking up and Trump, I think it is great that we see all these people realizing the extent of jewish power.

 

And I think Trump especially is to thank for it, because he is just so openly philo-semitic in a way that no previous president, even if they love jews as much as he does, they just wouldn’t do it so openly! You know, he goes out there and declares himself the King of Israel and he says this, that and the other. And it’s again, with the attack on Iran and the thing with Venezuela, there’s not even a pretence anymore. It’s just:

 

“We’re doing this because it’s in our interest and we’re attacking Iran because that’s what we want to do!”

 

They’re not having the pretence anymore.

 

[1:55:32]

 

Mark Collett: I don’t like to cut across people because we’ve all been pretty good at not cutting across people. But I just wanted to further your point. You know, when Trump does things which are so sort of egregious [chuckling] that you sort of wonder why he’s saying them. Like when he said:

 

“Oh the Adelsons basically bought me the White House! So whenever they want to just walk in and ask for a policy to be passed, what am I gonna do? It’s the bloody Adelsons! They gave me about half a billion. How are you gonna say no to the people who gave you half a billion? Come on, guys, let’s get things going!”

 

You’re thinking to yourself:

 

“Are you actually saying this? Are you actually saying to people, ‘look, the Adelsons bought me the White House. So then when they want a policy passing, I just bring them in and say, ‘What do you want?’ And when they say, ‘I want this.’ I just give it to them’.”

 

Most people would know which bits not to say out loud. You know, it’s like when you were a kid, your mom was like:

 

“Did you clean up the house?”

 

You’d be like:

 

“Yeah, I did!”

 

But you wouldn’t be:

 

“Well, actually, I spilt the water from the big vase, partially flooded the living room, spent ages dabbing it up, and have hid the stain under the mat!”

 

Because there’s part of it that you don’t say out loud, isn’t there? And there’s part that you say out loud. But Trump, he says it all out loud, and it becomes sort of so almost jarring to hear him say it, because for years, we’ve heard that politicians are bought, they’re sold. You know, powerful foreign forces pay for politicians to do their bidding. And here’s Trump just honestly saying:

 

“Well, that’s exactly what happens! I do it all the time! The Adelsons basically funded me, and I did everything for them. So when they want a policy, I give them!”

 

You don’t say that out loud, do you? You say:

 

“The Adelsons are an important part of what we’re hoping to do, and no one has undue influence over me, but I’m happy to hear from them.”

 

He doesn’t do any of that. There’s no beating around the bush. He basically says:

 

“Jew’s got me in. And when they want a policy passing, I give it to them!”

 

I mean, is that refreshing to hear? For me, it is, because it confirms everything that we’ve always said.

 

Natty: Yeah, he is known for slurping up the “juju come”. As someone put in the chat earlier.

 

I think the worrying thing is, or I guess it’s not worrying. I mean, it’s interesting. So there was like just this ground swell of JQ awareness, like Israel hatred after October 7th because of what Israel was doing to Gaza.

 

And then the media gets to declare:

 

“There’s a ceasefire, Gaza’s over. We can look away now. We can look away from the fact that Israel has been bombing hospitals and stuff.”

 

Because of the nature of the news cycle and everything else, people let it drop. And then this big orange slave, jew slave, Trump, comes along and starts a war with Iran, like, totally on behalf of his jewish handlers in Israel. And all of a sudden it’s like:

 

“Oh, right, my awareness is shaking again.”

 

Like:

 

“Now there’s just another thing that’s like, cannot be ignored where we have to bring out this question again to the public and try and explain why this war for Israel isn’t anything to do with jews and is secretly about Russia.”

 

Or whatever else it is. You know, so, yeah, I mean, awareness, awareness rising!

 

Mark Collett: So we pretty much wrapped up a lot of the things we were going to talk about. And we’ve already said that Israel has been proven through this not to be invincible.

 

And I think that’s one of the key things here. At one point, Israel touted the Iron Dome. It touted their invincibility. I think this has shown something that’s very interesting. It’s highlighted that America is Israel’s lapdog! But it’s also highlighted that without America, Israel couldn’t exist. And that’s important, I think, for two reasons.

 

There’s this symbolic idea of Israel being this invincible outpost in the Middle East that the Iron Dome protects and they can stand alone if necessary. I think Israel have been really undermined here, not just from a moral perspective, but from the view that they can be hurt, which is important. You know, one of the big things, if you’re ever in some kind of conflict, facing what appears to be an immovable or unstoppable enemy, to show that that enemy is, in fact, fallible and can be hurt is very important.

 

And although we’ve hardly seen Israel sink into the Mediterranean, I do think the strikes on Israel have been significant from the point of view that it has shown them to be scared, that if they don’t have the West on their side, they can’t defend themselves.

 

Yuro: Well, it’s like with October 7th. When October 7th happened, it showed the world that they’re not all powerful, they’re not all knowing, they’re not always just gonna win because they’ve got everything on lockdown. Their power does have limits. And there’s some amount of White nationalists who come out and say:

 

“Oh, no, they let that happen1 You know, they let that happen on purpose! That they have a reason to do this.”

 

But actually, it’s like you’re unwilling to believe that they just screwed up that badly.

 

[2:01:21]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m not going to get into a big debate, but I actually believe they let that happen. I believe that that was part of their plan and gave them this imperative to do what they did in Gaza.

 

However, I think Iran’s a different kettle of fish. I think that what we’re seeing with Iran here is something fundamentally much more damaging for them, because they have nothing to gain by letting Iran smash through the Iron Dome. They have nothing that they can say:

 

“Well, this gives us the moral imperative to do X.”

 

Because in the case of Iran, they’ve already done X, haven’t they? X has already been committed to, it’s already been carried out.

 

So I think there’s different things here.

 

But look, let’s wrap this up and we’re going to wrap this up before we do the questions and answers. If anyone wants to Superchat. If you’ve enjoyed the stream, please consider sending a Superchat. But we’re going to wrap this up with, obviously we’ve said this is for the Greater Israel Project and we’ve talked about the political ramifications around the world for America, for Russia, for China, for future conflicts.

 

But one thing we haven’t talked about is the political ramifications here in Britain. Now, obviously Starmer hasn’t embroiled himself and he’s made the right choice in that case, but probably for the wrong reasons. Rather than doing this because he doesn’t want to serve Israel, he’s done this because he doesn’t want to turn the Muslim bloc vote against him any further because he fears losing the next general election.

 

But what we can see here, or what I see here, is a major problem with refugees and they’re talking about potentially two, … There was the, I think it was the Telegraph that stated this. The calculation is that 2.5 million people will be displaced from the region due to this conflict. At the present time, that number could obviously rise and they’re all going to be coming to Europe, they’re not going to be going to Israel.

 

And I’ve always described this as sort of the twin evils of Israel. On one hand, Israel menaces, murders, maims, terrorizes states in the Middle East for its own gain and to maintain dominance in the region. However, the blowback is never for Israel! The blowback of all this ends up hitting Western nations who take the refugees or the people that are displaced.

 

And I think that’s the final piece of the puzzle, that the Greater Israel Project makes Israel more powerful, but by extension due to the knock on effect, it weakens the West, it pushes us closer to a demographic shift that will be unrecoverable and fundamentally takes us a step nearer to being a minority in our ancestral homelands!

 

Natty: Yeah, destabilising its immediate neighbours, like I said earlier, destabilising its immediate neighbours with missiles and bombs and gayops and all the rest of it, is a short timescale. But destabilising European countries with mass immigration and kind of ethnic cleansing and all the rest of that, that’s still just destabilisation. It’s just on a longer time scale. And I alluded to this earlier, but the Israeli gayops and the CIA and Mossad and MI6 operation, well I mean it was the open British government was just aiding like terrorists in Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi. Gaddafi had an agreement with Italy where Italy would pay him to stop, just endless floods of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. And Israel uncaring that that was in place or seeing that actually destroying that was a good thing because it helped destabilise everything, not just Europe, but top to Libya, decided to enact you know, plans against Gaddafi that ended with him, like I said, with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street.

 

And that led to the migration crisis in 2015, 2014, 2015, which is ongoing today. And I just posted in the private chat there because I just looked this up, Morgoth’s Law, which was spoken by Morgoth himself:

 

“No matter where the conflict is in the world, the refugees coming to Europe will be fighting age black and brown men!”

 

And that’s going to hold true for this conflict.

 

Now that might be coincidental in other cases but certainly with Iran this is the double, not the double edged sword but like the win-win situation for Israel. They get to destabilise nations by direct war against their like direct competitors. But they also get to destabilise their so-called “allies” in terms of European nations in America with all these displaced people who then through their human rights groups and refugee groups and these kind of NGOs get to set up migration routes into the countries who are supposedly their allies that they help destabilise. The knock on for politics in this country, unfortunately there won’t be much because we don’t have much of a choice. And if Reform was in power at the moment it would probably be just balls out gung-ho for Israel. So what choice do you have in this country? I mean it’s probably less than anywhere else.

 

Mark Collett: I will say though, I think Yuro is right in what he said. Every day that Rupert Lowe spends not endorsing Israel is a victory from our point of view. You know, I know that might sound like a cucky thing to say, but it has been so long since we’ve had anybody in any form of position of genuine power who hasn’t immediately been a slave to Israel. And it’s one of the things that Tommy Robinson’s been quite upset actually by a number of things Rupert Lowe has said and done. I don’t know if you saw, but Tommy Robinson said:

 

“You know, Rupert Lowe needs to clarify whether black people can be British. Rupert Lowe needs to clarify his position on all these things!”

 

Well, I find that very interesting because that suggests that Tommy and his handlers are getting quite nervous that Rupert isn’t going to be the Zio lap dog they hoped he would.

 

[2:07:56]

 

Natty: Yeah, the kind of the cucked civnat stuff that always bends towards this like piss-weak conservatism, as we’ve seen with Reform, where it just turns out they’re just as I mean they’re not really even civic nationalists, they’re just Conservatives in that anyone’s British, anyone who steps foot on this island is British.

 

So yeah, I mean funnily enough, Tommy wrote, those questions from Tommy Robinson he tried to put to Rupert Lowe:

 

“We’re in the wake of the Iran war starting and Rupert Lowe not coming out in support of Israel.”

 

And all of a sudden here you’ve got Tommy Robinson popping up like fresh from snorting up lines of coke on a mirror somewhere in America asking him about the same, well as pulling the same gay ops that he tried with the BNP all those years ago, which you know about very well, Mark.

 

Yuro: And after hopping off his private jet with his son, who’s posting about it on Instagram while he begs for money from poor White people who haven’t got a dime to scrape together.

 

Natty: Yeah, Tommy Robinson, just to reiterate, is absolute scum! He is scum! Everything out of Tommy Robinson’s mouth is like a jewish handler somewhere. And that has become more and more clear! There’s no like, no intersection of lines from real dissidency in this country in the West. And Tommy Robinson, this is like a literal jewish mouthpiece being paid by Israel to say the things he does.

 

And if you think there’s some part of Tommy that’s still good or some part of him that’s still worth listening to, then you simply haven’t been paying attention. And you need to, I don’t know, get with the programme or get your head right, because he’s evil, he’s terrible, and he’s a scumbag!

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

So I think we’ve had a pretty robust chat. We’re going to do the Superchats in a couple of seconds. If you want a Superchat, please do.

 

But I’ll say this, I think in conclusion. I’ve said this many times before, but the judeo-American empire is the greatest threat to the world!

 

Yuro: And I’ve said they are the great Satan!

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s not just the greatest threat, is it to White people. Now we obviously are fundamentally our thoughts are for White people. That’s the most important thing for us, that we look after people of European descent.

 

However, it’s not just people of European descent that suffer under the judeo-American State. Obviously Arabs suffer immensely.

 

And a lot of the problems created by the judeo-American States, actions such as these unnecessary wars, these toppling of sovereign regimes, the murder of government leaders in foreign countries, like Colonel Gaddafi. And look, when we say this, we’re not saying that Colonel Gaddafi is our hero or that we loved everything he did, but he was stopping millions of people passing through his country and entering Europe. And I’m sure that when he was toppled, there were many people within the Israeli regime and many leading jews in America and Europe that were very happy that there was going to be even more migrants headed to Europe.

 

And I believe that the only real way that the world can achieve freedom is for the judeo-American Empire to fall. I don’t know whether you guys agree with that. Obviously have 30 seconds each to sum up, or a minute or whatever you need.

 

Natty: That’s totally correct! And that is the line of, like I said a second ago, real dissidency, and this kind of rightoid, Right-wing, edgy conservatism. Like you said, the judeo-American Empire is the threat, is the problem! And if you’re not willing to say that, if you’re not willing to like cheer on its losses, then you’re not on the same level as you should be. I mean, you’re not where you should be. And I’m sure everyone listening to this is pretty much there, but those are the lines. There’s not a Left, Right, divide. There’s not a third Worldist, whatever it is, divide. It’s just you’re either hoping for this evil entity to fail or you’re not at this point. But, and we’re seeing, hopefully we’re seeing part of it sailing here. We’re going to see it fail more and more.

 

So that’s what I’m looking forward to. Not just that, but the visceral feeling when you, like you said, see a cluster munition raining down on Tel Aviv, feels good too. So enjoy it.

 

Yuro: White people the world over shall not be free until organised jewry is disempowered! Inshallah!

 

Mark Collett: That [chuckling] was the most concise you’ve been all night mate. Superb!

 

So, yeah, I think it’s been a very productive stream this evening.

 

And I think we’ve talked about a lot of things that people would want us to talk about. And without being boastful, I think that tonight we’ve kind of hit on more or less every major point, unless we haven’t.

 

But I think we put a lot of effort, obviously into ensuring that we did hit every major talking point tonight. And this was the, probably, I’d say the most comprehensive coverage of this particular issue that anyone will get. So I’m hoping that you guys enjoyed it. And we are going to do the Superchats now.

 

[2:13:54]

 

So thank you to everyone who has Superchatted. And if you haven’t, there is obviously still time. And remember, if you do send a financial contribution, it’s gratefully received because it’s what allows me to keep doing things like this and doing these streams.

 

Anyway, Mr. Skywalker gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“You and Red Ice were definitely correct about ZOG’s superior tactical advantage, which I never doubted. Still Iran and its proxies and have fared better than expected. Landing hits on ZOG’s military assets.”

 

And he goes on with another $3 and said:

 

“It appears ZOG is carpet bombing civilian structures in Iran now, as many military bases and missile sites are up to a thousand feet below ground, very difficult to destroy. Do you think ZOG will use ICBMs?”

 

I think we’ve said that actually that fundamentally we are seeing probably a better sort of defense than people may have initially thought. However, obviously going up against the judeo-American empire is absolutely not an easy thing to do they are doing better than we thought.

 

And interestingly, the Americans are already resorting to these horrific tactics of bombing civilian structures. Do you think Trump would go as far as using an ICBM?

 

Natty: It’s possible. You know, who knows? At every juncture where you think Trump isn’t going to do something, you know, sometimes, well, quite often he will just go ahead and do it. The problem with nukes is, one that’s a line that if you cross has real implications. If you drop a nuke on a country just because you started a war and are then subsequently losing that war,

 

Yuro: If you started a war to stop them having nukes and then when you have lost you use them!

 

Natty: Yeah, it kind of undermines, it’s a massive red line. Like I said, probably implications that none of us even can think about at this stage.

 

The second thing is, nukes, for all this talk of tactical nukes, they’re a surface weapon. You detonate them above ground. So they don’t really, in this war against Iran, they don’t really have like a tactical purpose and they would only be used to destroy, like, surface, weak, soft civilian targets, like cities. I mean, nukes are designed to be used on cities that are all like massed troop build-ups, which Iran doesn’t have. So morally it would be reprehensible and tactically it’d be stupid. Although it would just, it would literally just be against civilians. To use them in this war would be like, against civilian targets.

 

Yuro: Yeah, it wouldn’t benefit them one bit. And there’s no way that Russia and China would not respond to it. And that’s not saying that they would launch nukes themselves, but there would have to be some kind of bigger response from them. To get more actively involved.

 

Mark Collett: And I think Natty hit the real point here. The only time nukes have ever been used are on civilian targets. They are not a weapon that is used really for military sites. There’s all this talk of:

 

“Oh, well, people have got tactical nukes now, and a tactical nuke does this and the fallout’s not as great.”

 

And we’ve heard all of these sort of takes before, but fundamentally the only proven use for a nuke is to be used against a civilian target. That’s just the way it is.

 

And I personally believe that if the Americans did this and took it down that route, it would be this fundamental turning point that I’m not sure the world could recover from that you know, it’s happened obviously twice before and it was horrific what the Americans did to the Japanese. But to do it now and for America to be doing it because they started the war and it wasn’t going their way, I think the world would change in a way that we probably couldn’t actually completely understand right now! But I don’t think it will go nuclear.

 

Thank you so much for the two Superchats, though. Ruins in a Landscape gave $50. Thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. Bay of Kings gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thanks, Mark. It appears Natty’s dropped out.”

 

One of his devices has come unconnected, it says on the screen. I’m sure he’ll be back. Arab Social Nationalist gave $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thoughts on the spectacle of the Nigerian leader of the opposition, Olukemi Olufuntu Adagoki Badenok and Farage arguing that Starmer hasn’t done enough for the Yanks. There is no opposition in the British establishment. Ignore a whisper of dissent in Parliament. War for jews unites the establishment.”

 

I think this is very interesting. And obviously Badenock and Farage are looking at what got Trump to power. Now, fundamentally, Farage and Badenok are both out of power at the moment and I think they’re both kissing up to Israel as much as they can, hoping that that will be their ticket to a Trump style run at Parliament. And let’s face it, although at the moment Farage is the favourite to win the next general election, that can all change. And he is looking at sort of shoring up his position. But Kemi Badenok is looking at going into a general election where she will be decimated.

 

So it is interesting to see both Badenoch and Farage fighting to see who can be the most philo-semitic on this particular issue.

 

But I’ll say this, and this isn’t meant to be like a cold way to leave the stream, or a black pill at the end or anything of the sort. But there are still an awful lot, and I call them Boomers because they generally are from that sort of age bracket. Now, it’s not to say all Boomers are evil, but there generally is this sort of Boomer mentality of:

 

“Well, bomb them all! Get rid of the Arabs! We need to support Israel! They’re our greatest ally!”

 

And that rhetoric does still appeal to, I would say, a sizable portion of the Boomer population.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree. And because they don’t really want to think about it and the implications of it. So looks like:

 

“Oh, something else is going on. Well, to hell with them all! Just blow them all up! Bloody Arabs!”

 

And that’s a cultivated mentality. That’s not an accident that people say things like that and think things like that. This callous, cold, bloodthirsty, you know, mentality that’s been instilled in people through, I mean, basically like a real use of the term racism, where it’s:

 

“Yeah, Arabs are like dirty brown people and killing them anywhere is good!”

 

It’s like well, a normal human being, a moral human being doesn’t actually think that way. And if you’ve been led into thinking that some like, cartoon villain version of like, I don’t know, like a Western man, is ridiculous and retarded and immoral, and the people who put that idea in your head have taken a long time to do it, but have succeeded, if you come out making statements like that.

 

Yuro: And to the extent that it is a naturally occurring phenomenon, it’s as a result of having the Pakistani rape gangs that jewish people and organisations brought here and having the Sunni Wahhabi terrorists who are created by the funding of Saudi Arabia and Israel’s allies.

 

[2:22:23]

 

Natty: Oh, yeah, when Israel needed a recruiting ground for ISIS to destabilise Syria, they just used our country. And the overspill where like little girls were getting blown up in concerts or people were getting stabbed on London Bridge, that was exceptional.

 

Yuro: It’s just a bonus to them.

 

Natty: Yeah, that was just like a little side project for them.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, guys. We’ll go on to the next Superchat. It’s from Tomorrow’s Victims who gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“The vast majority of us here in Yank land do not want the stupid war. Cheers to all my UK people.”

 

Thank you so much! Some Guy 14 gave $10. Thank you so much! And he subscribed for $10. Well, that’s much appreciated. Remember, you can subscribe to me over on Entropy and Rumble, and that means you make a monthly donation.

 

And obviously on Entropy you can subscribe for any amount and Rumble is fixed, $5. But on Rumble, we’ve got a good number of subs now, a good number of followers, and if we had sort of 4 or 500 subs, that would just be phenomenal! And obviously it would really help me financially and it wouldn’t really make a massive difference to people as $5 is what, the price of a large can of Red Bull these days. But if enough people did that, it’d make a huge difference to me.

 

We also have one Superchat over on Rumble, only one tonight, and it’s from Archie P007. Thank you so much! Okay, $5. And you said:

 

“I was all in with Trump, the great awakening and all that he has sold his soul for Israeli gold. No one wins a war, only the people suffer always. Follow the money. Trump is Israel first, it seems.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, I obviously, I completely agree with that. Trump is Israel first. And Trump is someone who is absolutely committed to Israel, I think, in a way that I’m not sure we’ve ever seen before. I don’t think we’ve ever seen a president this committed to the state of Israel, which is obviously interesting in itself to say that, to say we’ve never had a president that is this committed to Israel, but he certainly is.

 

And at the moment, he is proving his loyalty to that nation to an unbelievable point! And whether this works for him in the long run or not, who knows? But I think it’s fair to say that he is risking everything for his loyalty to people who, …

 

And the interesting thing with these people is they did not support him when he was out in the wilderness. One of the interesting things with Trump is when he was saying:

 

“Look, the election was rigged.”

 

Netanyahu was actually the first foreign leader to say to Biden, to congratulate Biden on his victory. Can you remember that? I mean, Trump went mental about that at the time because he thought Netanyahu was his best friend. But it just goes to show, Trump isn’t actually. Well, he doesn’t actually have any principles whatsoever, does he? Trump is actually a guy that the Israelis can kick him, they can treat him like he’s their boy, their little dog. And when it comes down to it, he will take it time and again.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean the only difference, just to add the only difference is how open it is now. I mean, like I said earlier, the other president have probably done everything to the detriment of their own people on behalf of Israel. But Trump is just open about it and everyone gets it and everyone knows now and he’s just still ploughing ahead with it. So there’s the difference with this one.

 

Mark Collett: Anything to add Yuro?

 

Yuro: No, no, I think we’ve covered most of that already.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well look, that brings us to the end of the stream.

 

Thank you so much to everyone who has been here and obviously if you haven’t Superchatted and you’re watching this on replay, you can donate anytime you like on replay.

 

And if you do support these streams, especially these long form discussions which take a reasonable amount of time to prepare and we put a lot of effort into, please do consider sending a Superchat and we will keep doing them. Anyway guys, if you want to say good night, we’ll go around the group and then we will wrap things up.

 

[2:26:52]

 

Natty: Night guys. I have been looking at the chat and there’s been a lot of like pretty decent discussion in there. So I appreciate everyone who’s been here and you know, it’s good, it’s good getting all this down and talking about this because a lot of this stuff is beyond the kind of political divide that you see in this country between even nationalists who say things like:

 

“Oh, I don’t care about either side and they can kill each other!”

 

And that’s like the best you can hope for out of supposed Right-wingers and dissidents in this country. But I think a sober analysis and a sober talk about what it all means and what’s happening is worthwhile. So thanks to you two and thanks to the chat for turning up and I’ll see you around.

 

Yuro: Yeah, thanks for having me on. It’s been a good talk with both of you. Obviously we do get a bit of this chat going on with the A-Team, which I’m no longer going to be with because Sam’s back unless I’m a stand-in when someone’s away. But it was good to talk about this stuff. And maybe going forward I will get back into doing some sort of show again on my own. Maybe I’ll revive TASOB. Who knows?

 

Natty: Be very happy if you revived TASOB, buddy. So look forward to it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, thank you to both of you, it’s been a great chat. I just want to wrap things up by saying thank you to everybody.

 

Well, thank you first to Natty and Yuro for giving up their evenings. You know, obviously we enjoy doing this. We’re friends in real life and I think we’ve got pretty good chemistry and I think it’s been a pretty entertaining stream. I would also like to say a huge thank you to everyone who donated. Remember, you can donate at any point you wish.

 

And finally, a massive thank you to everybody who tuned in. We had really good attendance night. Lots of people tuning in, lots of people enjoying the stream and a really sort of quick, moving, interesting discussion on both the Odysee and the Rumble chat.

 

So thank you to everyone who participated.

 

Anyway, I won’t be back on Sunday. It was unlikely I’ll be back on Sunday because it was my son’s birthday this week and we’re having a little party for him on Sunday. So that will likely be something that may run on and I don’t really want to be rushing through that to do a Sunday night film review or stream. I probably just want to enjoy just a little bit of family time, which I’m sure no one begrudges me. And I will be doing that.

 

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday for Patriotic Weekly Review. Until then, thank you everybody, good night and look after yourselves.

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/16/2026 = 288)

Mark Collett
9 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to my work:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

5
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
On YT comments, I’ve noticed more people seem to be realising that Kosher Tommy’s brand of Nationalism is fraudulent & serves no purpose to British people.

14
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Like the English, the Iranians have no other country. Resistance is the only option.

11
0
Hide replies
Aspect of Divinity
5 days ago
I pray to God that the Iranian people succeed in their war against the Zionists and their Western puppets

@RonP1
9 days ago
A safe rule: Never get into bed with the Jew

10
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I have a cousin that married a Jewess. He is dead to me. I used to talk to his Mom frequently and she would complain how his wife basically ended Christmas in their family and how she’s rarely allowed to see her grandchild. I eventually told her “well what do you expect, he married a Jew”. She won’t talk to me anymore lol. My whole family is a bunch of sleepers, but that particular family is fuked. Her other son adopted a South Korean baby when he could have adopted a White baby. I’m done with that whole family.

7
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Not a good move, I guess people who are not race-conscious fall into this trap,
they probably believe ‘It’s just a religion’ and end up with an ugly contaminated baby

3
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Especially someone who marries a Jew, not much you can do there, especially once kids are involved. Even if they subconsciously start to realize their mistake, not only will they never attribute it to the spouse being a Jew, but they are caught in a bind not easily remedied. Same with White people who adopt non-White kids. Dead to me. If there was any possibility to fixing them in the past, that possibility is long gone.

2
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Imagine working out their Holo story is BS, but having to go along with it for the rest of your life because the wife is Jewish! lol

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I have my doubts my cousin would ever believe at any point that the holo story is a hoax. An old friend of my family also has a son who married a Jewess and from what I know about the 2 families, they are identical – the Jewess wears the pants, the family is Jewish to the core and Whiteness and Christianity has been stripped away. It’s pathetic.

2
0

@Theos19
6 days ago
Sounds like jgew hollywood did its work well on that family bro, sorry to hear this. There is nothing more shameful for a white man than to have a mixed breed child. Adopting another child not of your race is one of the most cucked things you can do. Raising another mans offspring with resources that should be for your own – how f-cking cucked is that. Someone else fcked your girl and put a kid in her, and you are raising their kid LOL. I was in the queue for the checkout once and I got caught staring at a man with his yellow wife (fat b-tch) and his mixed breed freakish looking son, I was with my wife and son around the same age. I couldn’t help but stare, it was like looking at a crash at the side of the road, or someone freakish you know? The cashier had to call me out and ask if she could help. After he noticed me the guy looked crestfallen and his yellow wife didn’t have any respect for him whatsoever lol.

1
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
I’m ashamed to admit that I started out as anti jihad, solely because of my job… I tried to rescue English girls from Pakistani Muslims who were mass raping torturing them, I did 20 years in my profession and saw the government as 100% anti White, anti English in every way. Mark et al helped me understand the truth!

6
0
Hide replies

@Theos19
6 days ago
Were you a social worker? I recall some of your comments on live chats over the years, harrowing stuff. Thank you for trying to stand up to evil. God will recognize his own.

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
6 days ago
Yes for 20 years! I did rescue many English girls, the youngest was age 8! The government is extremely anti White.

3
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
Purim explained…
“One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King’s minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman’s ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called “Haman’s Ears,” revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew in our midst”
JRM by Arnold Leese

6
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
The Young Turks, Anna K and all that group are not “awakening”. They are still anti-White and that will never change. While Anna does have harsh words for Jews as well as Israel, she and TYT are still anti-White libtards. Please stop blowing a load in your shorts because you think she’s hot. It is, indeed, simp behavior and quite embarrassing for us all.
She is/They are ANTI-WHITE. Got it?
Covington was right. Being pro-White is something Whites have a really hard time doing, even those that are racially conscious.

5
1
Hide replies
Judy_Izzum
8 days ago
anti-white or not, she is still the guest of honour at my hand party

4
2

@RonP1
9 days ago
Civ Nat = Kosher Nationalism

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump comes from the jewish community. He has been around them his entire life. They made his career in realestate in New York. He has belonged to them his whole adult life.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Remember: these jews bombed Qatar to kill Hamas’s chief negotiator. They’re out of control, and they cannot be negotiated with.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s not that they don’t think about it: the British establishment is actively antagonistic towards native British people; it’s not indifference, it’s active malice.

4
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Jews, Muslims, darkies in general. They all gotta go

4
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Next false flag: Nuclear attack on USA, EU country or both. Could be an EMP nuke instead of ground attack.
Lots of dissent for this war on both sides of political aisle, they need something like a “9/11” to force more Westerners to support the war. Approval is falling hard. They need a false flag event. Also would “justify” nuking Iran.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Shalom

0
5
Green
9 days ago
Excellent episode title. Spot-on. Thanks for your incredibly important work, Mark.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
THE JEW CRIES OUT IN PAIN AS HE SHITS HIMSELF AT THE BOMB SHELTER!

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
yes I know a jew was in charge of the Armenian genocide. And the fact that Armenians are Christians made it so much enjoyable for the jews.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
I like that the left woke up to the jq but make no mistake they still hate white men. And want white genocide.

1
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
The left did not “wake up to the Jewish question”. They still love and defend Jews. They do not see the Israel problem as a Jewish problem, they see it as a White Supremacy problem. I know it all sounds so contradictory and stupid, but that is what you get with a brainwashed group of people. They only oppose and support what they are told to, without thinking about it.

2
0
Prison Ships
9 days ago
The Honourable Pastor Chuck Baldwin leads +40k AntiZionist Christians out of Liberty Fellowship Montana.

3
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson drives a Bentley, all while his rightoid followers pay for his “legal fund”.

3
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
The likes are 101 and they need to be 109! Or 110, 111 etc

2
0
Edelweiß
8 days ago
Unless Judeo-Christian civilization is destroyed, the European race will die. Crush Jehovah! Hail Jupiter and give us victory!

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
We Whites must destroy the enemy race; they have relentlessly been attempted to destroy us for centuries! We Whites, of European descent must end this madness for the sake of all humanity.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
it was a bit like watching the A-Team but without the game and gay dancing tbf

2
0
Natty
9 days ago
night guys

1
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Cheers goyim \o

2
0

@RonP1
9 days ago(edited)
Remember before the 2016 election when the bell end said he would re-investigate 9/11 if he ever got into power

2
0
Ulrich22
9 days ago
most people dont have real opinion at all. they all hope that it goes away and they can forget about it like they did for the last 80 years or so.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Decades of Hollywood propaganda had a big part in it.

2
0

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Well done lads, I’ve learned a lot tonight

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
Me too, watching on replay! My friends dog is healing well, and has thoroughly enjoyed the chicken , skin and stock .

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Imagine a future Britain that has normal relations with foreign countries. It’s not asking for much.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@MarkCollett
– Starmer SAYS he’s not getting involved, but as we know from Gaza, he can assist Israel secretly. Don’t be quick to believe his public stance.

2
0

@Stryker!
9 days ago

@VesselofGrace
I may have to return to my roots. lol

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“Peace through perpetual war, goyim!”

2
0

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
No Iranian ever called me a goyim

2
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago
I don’t like this new term “Epstein regime” it takes away from “ZOG”, which is much more poignant.

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
“ZOG” deters from Jew though.

1
0
Bronze Green Oakwood
5 days ago
“I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen”
That came out of nowhere, nearly spat out my drink there.

1
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
“We tried the internet and spent years tapping to one another on keyboards, because we bought into the idea that ‘education’ was the answer, and if we could just get the truth to people, then things would change. Well, education without action isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit. We got the truth to people, all right, and it turned out to be nothing but a bunch of noise that was simply ignored, because the internet was where it stayed. Nobody ever did anything except tap on keyboards. Tapping on keyboards was no threat to them, we just let off steam and nothing changed. It is now crystal clear to any white man with two brain cells to rub together that the only thing that will make these dogs in power hear the word no is the sound of…”
Brigade

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are banking on the Americanisation of British politics, and I think they’re miscalculating.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You’re not as much in the wilderness as you think, Mark. It’s the Dissident right that has moved the mainstream to the Jewish Question.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I wouldn’t lend a jew my lighter, much less die for him. Imagine it.

1
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
His father before him was the exact same.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran, in principle, doesn’t want to be anyone’s vassal. They want mutually beneficial relationships, not to be a junior partner.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
This relationship with Russia is new. Historically, Iran didn’t have options for buying a new airforce, plus they’re fixated on developing their own capabilities.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The jew stands atop a pile of dead children and declares “AND WHAT, GOY?”

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The strength of the jew is that he is bold, and he is willing to shock the enemy with acts of depravity that are unthinkable for normal people.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
There’s no nobility in Western leadership anymore. These decrepit democracies have allowed the lowest filth of society to take power. Good men, sound men, competent men, are locked out of power.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You can’t be pro-White and drive wedges between Western countries the way Trump does. He’s a diplomatic vandal.

1
0

@why
9 days ago
lol.. its a fun song

0
1

@Germanicus
9 days ago
Purimfest 2026, that’s what I’m calling it

1
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Howdy good folk

1
0
Natty
9 days ago
howdy troops

2
1

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Lana Loktef or Anna K….choose one

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Dumb question on a channel like this. Anna K is a commie leftist no matter what her views
are on Israel and even Jews. She still believes Whites are evil. She is Anti-White! Lana, on the other hand, it 100% OUR PEOPLE. So, again, dumb question.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re White enough, for goodness sake.

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I generally like your comments, but as semite you’re non-White thus you have no place defining who is and is not “White”. That is OUR turf. Respect the boundaries (pun intended).

2
1

@why
9 days ago
jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
I LOVE JEWS

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bruh jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
wtf

0
3

@why
9 days ago
jews behind it all????

0
3

@why
9 days ago
gubbermints

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bayonet up the bum is gonna feel like a good option

0
3
Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
6
Hide replies
– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
8 days ago
Maybe not all you Jews are paedophiles, but enough are that we can make these generalizations.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
brutal

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
o/

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
maybe switch every episode between players so all can play?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
good night volks

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
14

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That seems like an age ago

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers-of-the-soul, I call them. And they are mostly evil. It’s okay to say so.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is capable of going nut and ordering a nuclear strike. He kept asking about it during his first term, apparently.

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I believe nuclear false flag first on USA, EU or bother, then they blame Iran and will nuke Iran.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
hahaha

Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
As far as the ” Greater Israel ” is concerned, Israel has every right to annexe terriories from Judea and Samaria,not because of ” biblical rights ” but because ever since Israel was created has faced constant aggressive wars from its neighbours..
When an aggresor wages a war and looses he has to pay a price.
Palestinians had many chances to create their own state yet they rejected everyone.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
“ever since Israel was created”
The creation of Israel was itself the original massive aggression which initiated all the interminable ongoing wars and unrest.
“Palestinians had many chances to create their own state”
The Zionists would never allow any viable, truly independent Palestinian state to arise. Such an option has never been on the negotiating table. The Zionist maximalists were determined to complete the ethnic cleansing of Palestine begun with the Nakba right from the beginning. Such hardliners have been openly running Israeli governments since Likud was first elected in 1977, and even before that exercised power from behind the scenes. For example, the creation of the Israeli nuclear weapon capability led by Shimon Perez at the behest of Ben Gurion; and the hardliner initiation of the 1967 Six Day War to take control of the West Bank and Golan Heights.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
So you think that when Israel was created in 1948 ,by concetration camps survivors and a few others and was attacked by 5 Arab countries ,it was able to conduct an aggressive war.Ok

Show reply
Truth hurts
9 days ago
So you guys think that if Israel is destroyed, UK and USA will be safer with the goat loving Agiadolahs, who beleive martyrdom and the 72 virgins ,being in charge of Iran’s nuclear arsenal.
That’s fine.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
The only reason Muslims pose even the slightest threat to the US or UK is because Jewish-led elites have mass imported them into the US and UK as part of their Great Replacement. The Great Replacement is the Jewish master strategy for stealing White nations from their people. It is not merely Muslims being mass imported. It is infinity non-Whites, both Muslim and non-Muslim.
Jewish supremacism is the fundamental problem, never part of the solution.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Wow .I didnt know that the Pakistanis and the Somalians are in the UK because of Israel. Thank you for letting me know.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Pakistanis and other immivaders are in the UK because of powerful British Jews and the treasonous elites like Tony Blair who are allied with them. Jewish supremacism includes but is very far from being limited to Zionism.

Hide replies
Truth hurts
7 days ago
Blair brought the Pakistanis
ok.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
7 days ago
You really are clueless about history. There were some Pakistanis in Britain before Blair but it was Blair’s New Labor government which opened the floodgates to mass non-White immigration into the UK. I recall reading an article by Keith Woods a few years ago about this. He quoted statistics.

1
0
TDOF
5 days ago
Read:
https://archive.org/details/the-death-of-fragility-2nd-edition_202507

@ゼロHope
6 days ago
1:37:25
It is far more accurate to say Trump is saying, do as a I say and i’ll shot. There is no out option for Iran. It’s like “shame they won’t come to the table” but also Unconditional surrender, and we blew up the table and the guy negotiating with us.
There is nothing to negotiate. This is like the last time we attacked Iran, Trump started with the negotiating position of, “bomb yourself.” What is there to even to discuss? Especially after killing the pope-king of shia islam. You can’t simply do that, declare victory and leave. Everything of value with in striking distance, Iran will strike. They have choice, they couldn’t surrender if they wanted to.

Kevin
6 days ago
Ben Gavir currently in hospital and his house burning. so yes, we have seen such attacks

Kevin
6 days ago
they did hit one of the carriers with a drone, but they moved them too far away. why dont you know anything about what you are trying to talk about?

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia can’t produce infinite airplanes! come on! they don’t even have enough planes for their own war

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia is helping and Russia has made many public statements, they are just not covered. before the whole thing started every day Russia was sending plane after plane of weapons to them. Russia also spoke to Trump today and seems to have warned him they won’t let the US topple the government. right after Trump started talking about backing out.

@Kubatism
8 days ago
You are probably right, but the Venezuelan stuff also points to a broader context not discussed here – the China future war. All Chinese allies: Russia (bogged down in Ukraine), Venezuela (oil), Iran (supports Russian war effort and oil) you’ve got South Africa next (the current Afrikaner emigration policy of US, Ramaphosa humiliated) you’ve got only Brazil and India left – and India won’t help China

Alice1488
8 days ago
I love listening to Mark, Natty and Yuro! Actually real information about what’s going on! I pray that Isreal is nuked!

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
ALOHA SNACKBAR

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Warren Balogh is the master of this line of thinking

@Natty

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
The Colonel’s Fried Chicken was the best

0KT0BER
9 days ago
https://rocketreach.co/orla-minihane-email_748059991

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
DIdn’t he mention Ian Wright in particular?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
In British politics, crumbs from politicians feel like a slap up meal, alas.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That agreement still has legal force in Libya, if the EU decides to keep up their part.

@vengeance
9 days ago
i dont though

@vengeance
9 days ago
dawson agrees with you mark

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I think every leader will get assassinated that are against jews. Remember that Austrian far right prime minister that was killed in a strange car crash?

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Jörg Haider, killed in a car crash in 2008 while leading the polls in elections to the Austrian parliament.
“[Haider] was Governor of Carinthia on two occasions, the long-time leader of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and later Chairman of the Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich, BZÖ), a breakaway party from the FPÖ….. Haider died in a car accident shortly after leading the BZÖ in the 2008 Austrian parliamentary elections.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s because he’s thick, Mark. It’s as simple as that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes Trump’s crass vulgarity and his lack of discretion and restraint have helped a lot.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
*more

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Lowe is a tory of the soul, and he’s on a journey. Perhaps he will do it.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
This stream is the funniest :joy:

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re not National Socialists, but they don’t need to be.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We crank anti-semites are vindicated. Years of naming them, against the protests of pearl-clutching rightoids is bearing fruit. Enjoy the compliment.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
the donmeh Turks were jews

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
i get it, shes right now though

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s like a British person working for an Indian as a servant.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
Yeah but working for people who genocided you shows a lack of self respect.

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
everyone comes from somewhere buddy

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Come on Mark an Armenian woman working for Turks? I like people with self respect.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
She wants to be careful though. Sometimes, she’s seconds from throwing Romans.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
hahaha

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
NO HE IS GREEN!!!

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
She is Armenian

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
MAGA or MIGA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tucker is a very naughty goy. He might end up having some sort of accident.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Tucker was recently denounced by Trum and kicked out of the “MAGA” movement.

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
The Iranians have developed small submarines that are essentially underwater “drones” with which they can target American ships. It’s not just missiles that are a threat to Americans.

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Had a boomer tell me yesterday: “thank g-d trump bombed Iran. My grandbabbies are safe” hhhhWuuuuut???

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
My beloved Ana. Watching her journey has been terrific.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
+his jewish mentor

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yep

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lots of Russian cargo planes delivered something to Iran

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
We don’t know because help would certainly not go through official channels. Who knows how much Russian aid actually is.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“You have the clock, but we have the time” – Some Ayatollah.

@bagelsandloxism
9 days ago
they have hypersonic Iran is an advanced country

@vengeance
9 days ago
there are no more missles. they cant be made any faster.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lawnmowers of mass destruction

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
they say 80%

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
then the party starts

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yeah they’ve used the old stock to drain the AD systems. The good stuff is yet to come, when the jews run out of American interceptors

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
I hope they wait for the interceptors to be used up first

@vengeance
9 days ago
death, death

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or Mario

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Iran has no allies only jew controlled enemies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s becoming impossible for Iranian moderates to argue against getting the nuclear bomb.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
they suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
lol russia cant do shit

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It didn’t help Syria

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Sanctions – and historic Russian reluctance to sell them jets

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
because that costs a ton of money

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I’m sure that fatwa still stands now that he’s dead.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran has this hyper-fixation on self-sufficiency. It’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
China will look at this shitshow and conclude that they’ll defeat the Americans if they attempt to stop unification with Taiwan.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
russia and the US suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
endless whataboutism

@noreplacement
9 days ago
The heat pumps are good for some things. But not homes and DHW

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Heat pumps are noisy and do not get hot enough. We have one

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Winter in Europe will get interesting

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
110%

@Natty

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
can you imagine making love to jigsaw

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
imagine the smell…

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I wonder what his reaction was when he first saw her knob?

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
yuck.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Nihil sub sōle novum, governments have been doing this since the dawn of time since the first peasant revolts.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
he needed to attack before the midterms

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is in constant touch with Laura Loomer, and he thinks that she is connected to the base and he listens to her jewish lies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Franco,

@MarkCollett
Let’s not forget Franco. He lasted till the 70s.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@utopia148800
Doing that might be the point of no return.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
it depends how much murder the government is willing to commit and I think they will just start mass killing people.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
The Peace President

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Of course, everything was done on purpose, I wouldn’t be surprised if they said that the girls read Mein Kampf.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They could topple the regime. The monarchy is despised.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Murdoch Murdoch episode with the Trump train lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
LOL!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Andrew Neill looks like a clump of haemorrhoids

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
gross

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
HAHAHAHAHA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They think they can make the state collapse, which means that they refuse to believe that Iran is a real, capable country. This tendency to underestimate and insult the enemy could be their undoing. They did the same with Yemen. They couldn’t understand the resilience of the Yemenis.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
shows the power of PR and sticking to the script

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they wanted to hit the girls school

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
yes!

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@why
who is that aimed at?

Natty
9 days ago

@why
do we?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
I don’t know it’s all the same fake terrorist org working for israel

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We’ve been assured they do “surgical strikes” for decades. Either they can, or they can’t – or they won’t. It’s clearly deliberate.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
“Iran military says Strait of Hormuz remains open, but any US, Israeli ship will be targeted” lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
9 days ago
yet you support faggots who want to blame women and hitler — like keith woods and nativist

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
isis k

@utopia148800

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
You guys remember when a jew was screaming at a Russia Today reporter that Russia will pay for supporting Iran than a few months later a giant ISIS terrorist attack was launched at a Russian Mall?

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they did the legal games with the German soldiers after the war, too. Instead of POW, called them Disarmed Enemy Forces. To circumvent the Geneva conventions.

0KT0BER
9 days ago
Terror Cimbricus

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I don’t think America actually has allies, but I think you hinted at that

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
always, because America is controlled by jews so they essentially act as jews.

@teja
9 days ago
Trump Judenknecht!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes America does betray its “allies”.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
no people just have short memories, When Bush senior told the Shias to rebel against Saddam and America will help them than when they revolted Saddam brutally massacred them and America refused to help.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
I’m waiting for the sequel to USS Liberty

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Right.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It’s obvious now why Trump kidnapped and took over Venezuala. Oil

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump, with his bad-faith fake negotiations has changed America’s international standing forever. Who on earth would do a deal with them now? He’s a diplomatic arsonist. Look what he’s done to Canada.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein clique works too

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
They are using the term regime since Saddam

@why
9 days ago
what are we talking about guys?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
And I imagine there no advisors around Trump who are willing to tell him things he doesn’t want to hear.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump hates nuance, and complexity, and he wants reality to match his simplistic hopes. He wants this to be easy, and he cannot accept that it isn’t easy at all.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or, or, jews being stoned.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
hahah jews don’t think so. That’s why they had Sam Hyde fired.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re targeting the organs of the state: police stations, hospitals, etc.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Every Single Time

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Yes, it’s amazing how they managed to conquer all those countries one by one.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are the government. The capital is theirs, and they act as the state.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I mean what do you except? Tommy is an ex convict and a petty criminal and fraudster. And He claims he is jewish.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
he went full jew slave. Bet he is circumcised too like a good slave.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Trump went full retard

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Hi Chief. I understand why people follow Tommy Robinson, jews are putting tens of millions of Pounds behind him and he has a large organization and social media boost. Essentially he has hundreds of liars on the payroll.

Chief Moody
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
That is true. lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Tommy’s been on a coke bender since October 7. I’m not sure he’s slept for three years.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Roosevelt imploring him to use nuclear weapons against Germany but the letter sat on Roosevelt’s desk because Roosevelt has died overnight.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Andinia Plan

Chief Moody
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson and co have been very ghoulish over Iran. How people still support them, I’ll never understand.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Israelis are colonising Patagonia right now.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Japan had already offered surrender 3 times. They still nuked ’em

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real, Natty. Israeli journalists are happy to talk about it.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real. They talk about it in Hebrew media.

Chief Moody
9 days ago
It’s very blatant what Israel are doing with Iran. It’s shameless at this point.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being desribed as America’s streetwalker is like getting pimped out by a literal whore

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Well that actually happens once an opportunistic whore ages – she becomes a pimp.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Well, there is no planning for this war. The war aims change hour to hour, and Iraq was extremely well-organised.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It’s always demoralizing to see conservative patriots in America viewing our country’s greatest ambition as being Israel’s bitch

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Yeah they just don’t care. What will the goyim do? Nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“The Dossier”. At least they had that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Farage has been absolutely hysterical over this. “We have angered the Americans!”

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
9-11 made the anti-war position more difficult back then.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Not me. The state of most young fatties, they won’t even make it to a hospice

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Has anyone else seen Asmongolds blatant warmongering?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Once the Bush administration got away with lying about Sadam and terrorism ties and a complete fabrication of weapons of mass destruction, it was GAME OVER for government accountability.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers using their final breaths to comment from their hospice beds.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Plenty of young folk think that way too sadly

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
100%. GenX is largely Boomer 2.0

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Bahraini government is illegitimate, and delusional. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government falls during this conflict. The Bahraini people stand with Iran, by and large.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
There was a Yemeni calling in to a Bahrain TV show and the Bahrain TV host said there is no war in Bahrain

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Bibi WhataYahoo

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Netanyahu has such contempt for the goyim. The fact that he thinks Americans are stupid is becoming very obvious. A rational person wouldn’t buy a used car from him.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
The israelis and the the jew controlled countries hiding a damage.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@utopia148800
that’s what I meant ha ha

MarcoEire
9 days ago
All true, I wish we weren’t inundated with ai slop of Tel Aviv

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
jews and degenerates; European America is in the past.

Natty
9 days ago

@noreplacement
it only looks that way

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
The absolute state of the USA…

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Winged Lawnmowers from Hell

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I just want to see Tel Aviv flattened.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It is difficult to find any Iranian fight back video. It all looks one way success for the Epstein coalition

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The UAE is cracking down on videos; Bahrain has banned street gatherings; the jews are cracking down on footage of Tel Aviv. The true extent of this madness won’t be cleat until the dust – or sand – settles.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s hard to be circumspect, but it’s best to be cautious and not get one’s hopes up.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
haha you do it than.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Yuro needs a wedgie tbh

MarcoEire
9 days ago
PURIM FEST 26

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Evening volks!

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Excellent Germanicus

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s karma for Mark being very mean to Sam last stream!

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Greetings fellow Social Nationalists

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
\o

Esau rising
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
o/

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Natty

Natty
9 days ago
thats good lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Greetings war-weary goyim.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein regime

@vengeance
9 days ago
o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show and to start us off. Superchat from Death Culture saying for the NSN war chest. And yeah, we’re getting straight into it. Big show for you this evening. Blair wasn’t around last week, so we’ve got a bit to catch up on. A lot to break down in international politics. Interesting, interesting stuff to cover.

 

There’s been a bit of a theme over recent weeks which is kind of going to continue into this episode.

 

But yeah, I want to reflect upon what’s happened in this Israel, Iran situation because on one level nothing happened, which was my prediction, but on a deeper level, something is going to happen, for many, many reasons, which we will get into in the broader situation. Interesting stuff as well in Australian politics. Mark Latham going to war against Chris Minns in New South Wales over these Hate Speech laws and the role of the jewish lobby and so on. Interesting to discuss that among other things.

 

But before we get into it. How you doing, Blair? You came for the show this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man! Got a lot I want to ask you. Get your take on a few things.

 

As you said, there’s been some international politics, which is not my favourite kind of politics, but I’d still like to get a comprehensive understanding. To get a bit of a Joel Davis take a series of Joel Davis takes on what’s been going on. But I’ve got an early start in the morning, that’s why., … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: I was going to say you. It seems like you’ve had a bit to say about this as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, my takes are kind of, …

 

Joel Davis: Interesting to get your breakdown.

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t really had the opportunity to really read into it and develop a full understanding. I’m kind of just going with my gut. I’m surprised the way it turned out. Like Trump shouldn’t have been able to bomb another country and then two days later step in to supervise a peace deal with the country he just bombed. Like on paper that shouldn’t be possible, but he somehow pulled that off. He did that. I don’t know how Trump makes stuff like that work, but I don’t know. He’s an interesting individual. We’ve discussed that on previous shows.

 

But yeah, like I was saying, I’ve got a really early start in the morning, so I asked Joel if we could start a little bit earlier. That’s why we’re kicking off just after 8:00.

 

But yeah, lots to discuss. Should be a good stream. Where do we want to start now? Is Joel coming through blurry for anyone else or is that just me? I might have to have a look at my Internet connection here. We’re both coming through clear here. Or Joel’s blurry. What are you guys seeing at home?

 

Joel Davis: Not seeing much in the chat either way. Yeah, we got blurry. Yeah. Well, I think it’s a connection issue. One second. You can entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s getting a little better.

 

Joel Davis: Entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty clear now. Warm up the warm up the device, I suppose. Man, it’s cold times down here in Australia. Middle of winter.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it has been cold. And on the subject of seasons, that was going to be one of the themes for the episode this evening for me, because one thing that I have learnt in politics, politics works by season. So, like, for example there’s been big riots and protests in the United States recently. I remember around this time last year, there were big riots in the UK, race riots. Because it’s the summertime in the Northern Hemisphere, those kinds of things tend to only happen in summer. Down here in Australia, it’s winter. During the winter time period, not much is happening politically, everyone kind of switches off, hunker down. And Australian politics generally, I mean, it’s not that eventful at the best of times, but it’s especially not eventful during winter.

 

And I think that’s true across the board. I remember last year, it did kind of feel like things were a little stagnant through the winter time. And then as soon as we got into the springtime, all of a sudden it was all action. There was just rallies all the time and controversies. And it felt like there was a lot of forward pressure into the summertime. You know, a lot happened on Australia Day and so on around then through the summertime, momentum built up and expressed itself.

 

Then there’s all these legal cases that are upon us and we move into the wintertime and kind of hunker back down. That seems to be how it works in politics.

 

So a lot of people are pressuring us:

 

“When is the political party going to be launched? When’s the political party going to be launched?”

 

Well, it actually wouldn’t make sense to launch it in the wintertime. Would make a hell of a lot more sense to launch it at the complete opposite time of the year when there’s a lot more energy and there’s a lot more vitality in the people and in politics.

 

So at the moment, we’re on our kind of winter kind of lull down here in Australia, but internationally things are kicking off. And yeah, I think the biggest story obviously is its the to and fro between Israel and Iran, which came to an abrupt halt. Obviously last weekend you had, remember looking at my phone, Sunday morning we had a Yuletide celebration and many of the boys, so we’re awake up, kind of like hungover from Yuletide festivities on the Saturday night, the winter solstice down here in Australia. We’re driving down to the servo and I pull my phone out and it’s like:

 

“Holy shit, Trump just bombed Iran!”

 

It was very quick. Like, it was like Trump announced it on Truth Social, his social media site, before anyone else touched it.

 

[06:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you use that, Truth Social?

 

Joel Davis: It seems like only Trump uses it and maybe, I guess his biggest supporters.

 

But anyway, I had to go on his Truth Social and check, is this real? It was real. And he was, he kind of had this tone of like:

 

“All right, we’ve blown up the nuclear sites, this is done. If Iran stands down, we’ll just call it sweet, we’ll move on.”

 

And in the days since, you know, reports came out saying:

 

“Well, I don’t think they really effectively took out their nuclear program.”

 

Israel were talking a lot tougher. Even Trump himself was talking a lot tougher, talking about regime change. Iran were claiming they were going to have a big retaliation. Then Iran did a symbolic retaliation immediately. We’re getting a ceasefire, apparently. And Trump somehow even seemed to restrain Israel, which surprised a lot of analysts, where apparently there was a loose Iranian missile that was a bit late, just kind of missed the cut-off point for the ceasefire, allegedly, or whatever.

 

And so Israel sent all their jets. And then you see Trump coming out saying:

 

“Israel doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing!”

 

To the world media, and making all these posts on his social media saying the Israeli planes can just wave hello and then they’re going to turn around and fly home. Don’t bomb anyone. We’re having a ceasefire. It was kind of interesting political theatre, but it managed to hold. And in the days since, it’s been kind of interesting. Trump has been very supportive of Israel, supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the same time ignores the intelligence reports that say that the nuclear sites weren’t properly destroyed. Says that’s all fake news. They’ve relaxed sanctions on Iran after the so-called ceasefire, but no negotiation seems to have taken place. There’s no deal. Iran has left the IAEA, which is the world leading kind of body or whatever for inspecting nuclear sites.

 

So what’s the solution here exactly? Like, it seems like the cans just being kicked down the road, but nothing’s actually been resolved.

 

Now, I personally don’t think it’s a problem if Iran gets nuclear weapons. In fact, I’m totally cool with them getting nuclear weapons. And I don’t think that it’s could be a problem that we deal with. But obviously from the perspective of Trump and the Zionists who control America, that’s a big problem. And from the perspective of Israel, it’s a big problem. So it’s kind of surprising to see that.

 

And a lot of people said:

 

“Well, how come that happened?”

 

And the reason why I was predicting that this kind of something like this would happen from the very beginning was not because I don’t think Zionists control America or I don’t think the jews have the levers of power. Quite the opposite. Obviously. The reason why I predicted this was because the United States has got more issues right now than just Iran and Israel.

 

Back in 2003, when the United States invaded Iraq, America was by far the world’s most powerful country. The richest, strongest. No one came close to the United States in 2003. And no one dared challenge the international order and their power and authority basically anywhere in the world. Like Russia and China totally like acquiesced to the invasion of Iraq and said:

 

“Okay, do it.”

 

So America was able to just break international law, do whatever it wanted, obviously at the behest of Israel at the time, and get away with it and just flush trillions of dollars down the toilet and deploy all its military, and nothing happened.

 

However, today it’s a very different global situation. You’ve got an active war in Ukraine, Russia’s committed there. And Trump came in to the presidency trying to come to some kind of peace deal there to neutralise relations with the Russians in order to be able to pivot to China, which is the real big deal. China is obviously potential superpower, a rising peer competitor of the United States. And there’s the issue of Taiwan, where if China moves on Taiwan, that could trigger World War Three, where the United States is obligated to defend Taiwan to hold together its position in the East Asian region.

 

Then you’ve got China versus America, two most powerful countries in the world. That’s World War Three. So what happens if America goes in and invades China, Iran right now? Well, they completely ruined their negotiating position with the Russians in Ukraine.

 

And they also are basically inviting the Chinese, like:

 

“Hey, why don’t you just invade Taiwan right now because we’re over committed and you’re never going to get a golden opportunity like this.”

 

So I think because of that broader situation, even though of course the jews who run America are no fans of Iran, there’s a limitation on what they can do. And I think that’s what we saw just happen.

 

And so the reason why nothing happened this time is because a much larger happening is on the horizon, I think it’s basically inevitable that a much larger war will occur over the next few years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was going to ask you. And you already answered the question I was going to ask you. Obviously this back and forth between Iran and Israel isn’t going to become a World War Three situation. It’s not a broad scale war. It’s kind of petty, a bit of a nothing burger. That’s what it turned out to be anyway. And you rightfully sort of predicted that, or not really predicted it, but you just called it for what it was before anybody else did, as far as I can tell.

 

So what is the World War III situation? Does that have to involve China and Taiwan? Is that your perspective?

 

[12:00]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, now if things flare up again between Iran and Israel, which seems inevitable because there isn’t much of a conclusion here to what’s happened, that could invite the Chinese in, they get to make a move.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about the other way around? If China tries something with Taiwan and America’s tied up in that, then I suppose hostilities could flare up between Iran and Israel again because they would expect the Americans to be distracted by whatever’s happening.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that would maybe play in Iran’s favour, you would think, because they would think, oh well, Israel’s now undefended. But what Israel showed, I think, in this engagement was that it has a military dominance over Iran, like of the two sides, the Iranians took a lot more damage than Israel. And there’s a thousand miles between two countries. Very difficult for either country to conduct a proper war with one another, whether there’s actually fighting on the ground, which is why historically Iran has been kind of backing Hezbollah and things like that. Groups that are actually bordering with the United States. Sorry, with Israel!

 

But it’s kind of like a sideshow. You know, the deeper and more profound reality is America versus China. And there’s two very interesting historians that have co written a few books together. One of them is dead now and what is coined as the Strauss Howe generational theory. I’ve been reading a book called the Fourth Turning, which was co-authored by these two historians in the late 90s. They have a kind of generational theory of American history where they say:

 

“Well, in order to understand history, you have to kind of understand it through the prism of every 21 years or so.”

 

Generations emerge and kind of swap social roles, whether they be the children, the young adults, the midlife types or the elderly.

 

And as each generational shift happens, there’s a shift in mood and a paradigm shift basically in the overarching society. And they plot this onto Anglo-American history. And what they find is that they kind of come in fours. There’s kind of like a cycle of four generations, which makes up the average kind of lifespan of a healthy human being. And how basically every kind of lifespan every 85 years or so in American history, or even going back into British history prior to that, you get a crisis.

 

And so you had World War II about 85 years before that you had the Civil War about 85 years before that you had the American Revolutionary war about 85 years before that you had the Glorious Revolution in Britain where Stuart monarchy was deposed. And there’s a huge paradigm shift at the time and so on. And you keep kind of cycling back and finding these parallels. And so according to this theory, which is eerily accurate in a lot of its predictions and its analyses, basically now between the next few years is supposed to be the kind of crescendo of the crisis point where something like a World War II or Civil War type level happening is supposed to occur in American history.

 

And at the same time as you have this theory, there’s also many theorists of war history who describe how you have these 95 to 100 year cycles, roughly speaking, that occur between kind of wars that reset the global political order that have been occurring every 90, 95 years or so throughout European history.

 

And again, we’re kind of reaching that point where the next, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So we’re overdue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, we’re basically, if it happens soon, we’re right on time. We’re right on time. And it does feel like there’s this kind of air of inevitability where you know, you have something called Thucydides Trap. Thucydides was an ancient Greek historian. He wrote about Peloponnesian War. He wrote about the war between Athens and Sparta.

 

And basically you have this situation where this tendency in military history and political history where you’ll have a dominant power in a region or in this case in the world that’ll enjoy after a great victory in a major war, a period of dominance.

 

And then eventually they’ll have somewhat of a decline and a new challenger will arise, a new great power will arise, and the status quo that was kind of set up under the dominance of the original power will eventually be challenged by this emerging new power because they’ll become too powerful to basically accept the subordinate position. And when this occurs, it’s basically inevitable that these two powers will go to war. And it’s almost like all throughout human history, you see this happen again and again and again and again!

 

In the early 20th century, you saw basically the dominance of the British Empire, the rise of Germany. They challenge one another. America ends up inheriting the position of the British and finishing the job. But you see this time and time again. And that’s obviously what’s happening now with China, where in the last, you know, few decades, China has become so wealthy, has had so much growth, and they’re building incredible amounts of military hardware, their navy’s swelling, all their tech is developing very rapidly, like military tech. And from the Chinese perspective, Taiwan is part of China.

 

In fact, from, even from the American perspective, technically, Taiwan is part of China. Everyone agrees because Taiwan was actually controlled by China. After the Second World War concluded, where you had an alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists to fight the Japanese in China. The Nationalists and the Communists started fighting one another. The Communists won. The Nationalists basically were pushed back onto the island of Taiwan and they basically were stuck there ever since. And the Americans initially protected the Nationalists from the Chinese and had the ambition perhaps of like, reinvading China and putting the Nationalists back in power over the Communists, but that never happened.

 

And so basically it’s like this Chinese civil war that was never fully resolved. So from China’s perspective, like America deciding it would be like imagining if we had a war in Australia between the Left and the Right, and then the losing group had got exiled to Tasmania, we would still consider Tasmania part of Australia. Whoever won would want Tasmania back. And if then America.

 

[19:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: How did China end up losing control?

 

Joel Davis: You’re not allowed to invade Tasmania. That’s against the rules. We would be like, cool. Like fuck you!

 

Blair Cottrell: But how did China lose Taiwan in the first place?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the Nationalists, Taiwan is controlled by Chinese people as well, but they’re just the Nationalist group that were pushed out by the Communists. But they’re ethnically Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exclusive political structure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like, Taiwan has been conquered by other powers throughout history. Like, it was conquered by the Japanese at one point, it was conquered by the Portuguese at one point and so on. But Taiwan is more or less Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I had a couple of feelings regarding Donald Trump. Just paying attention to his body language, his speeches.

 

I feel like he has Israel fatigue. I feel like Trump is kind of fed up with Israel. And someone in the comments triggered that thought in me. I noticed that in Trump. I noticed that in his demeanor. It feels like he’s annoyed by Israel. He’s sick of Israel, but he doesn’t really openly admit it. He’s still playing the game, but he definitely seems frustrated. More frustrated with Israel than he was by Iran, I think. But he’s still trying to make it seem like he’s kind of equally annoyed by both of them, probably a little bit more by Iran, because nuclear bombs or whatever.

 

But I also got the sensation that isn’t Donald Trump just a stereotypical merchant? I’m not saying nations should be at war with each other, but it is a natural thing. And Trump mentioned many times, why can’t they just go back to trading? They’re excellent trading. Iran great trading. Not traitors as in betraying, but trading like buying and selling.

 

And it’s like a merchant, the big international merchants stepping in and saying:

 

“Hey, guys, stop killing each other. There’s money to be made. Don’t you guys want to make money? Let’s just keep trading and getting rich. Use your population to generate more wealth and start trading those resources. Why fight for something you believe in when you can make money?”

 

That’s kind of how it felt, right? They were the feelings that I had observing Trump’s reaction to this whole debacle between those two nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think that’s an accurate assessment.

 

Also, Trump does have this tendency to kind of do some big individual military action, like where he does like a big, well publicized bombing or something, and then goes, all right, let’s negotiate a piece. Trump is very averse to long drawn out wars.

 

But I think it’s also because I think Trump and his people are aware of what I was describing about China. And their entire strategy seems to be trying to get the affairs in order of the empire broadly, so that they’re able to focus on the threat of China, because that’s why Trump is going easy on the Russians and why he’s trying to come to the table with Putin and make a deal where Biden was not looking at doing that. Not because Trump is some Russian agent or something. I don’t think you could argue that he’s a jewish agent, but you can’t argue that he’s a Russian agent. I don’t think there’s evidence for that.

 

But the reason why he’s doing that is because of pragmatism. It’s just simply the assessment that if you’re going to go to war with China, you don’t also want to have the Russians on the side of the Chinese against you and fight on two fronts. You’d rather neutralise the Russians so that you can take on the Chinese directly. And that’s kind of what he’s trying to do. He’s trying to kind of change the state of play. And Israel is just a thorn in his side because Israel is just focused upon Israel’s narrow individual interests,

 

Blair Cottrell: Ethnocentric interests.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, of course. And for Israel, this is a golden opportunity. Israel have been pretty successful in their conflict with Hamas. They were successful against Hezbollah in their recent battle. The Assad regime fell in Syria.

 

So all these dominoes are falling all around them. And it’s like, now there’s. Now they’ve got the chance to go and try and force the issue on Iran. They’ve got their guy Trump in office who they think they can get something out of because they’ve got leverage over him. He’s embedded in all these jewish power structures.

 

You know, I remember when we talked about it on the show a few weeks ago when there was discussion about Trump and Epstein, because it was brought up. Oh, what happened here?

 

Blair Cottrell: You lost your camera by the look.

 

All right, well, I’m expecting Joel to be back momentarily. Here he is. Seems to be having some technical issues, and I’m not sure I have. The mental acurity. Is acurity a word.q

 

What I’m trying to say is I don’t believe I have the necessary knowledge to follow on with that point. I just can’t see your face. I can hear you, but I can’t see you.

 

[24:33]

 

Joel Davis: What the fuck is going on? One second. Yeah, it’s mental acuity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Acuity. Right, right. I always have the right word in my memory bank. But A, I don’t actually know what it means, and B, I often mispronounce it, but the word is in the bank. It’s the strangest thing. It’s like well, why do I know the right word to use if I can’t even be sure of what it means? Words often sound like what you want them to mean. What I mean is words mean what they sound like they mean. Have you found that with English? That’s what I think.

 

Anyway. What I’m saying is sometimes I’m thinking and the right words just come to me and I don’t know why that happens. Sometimes I don’t even know what they mean. And that’s an example of that right there.

 

But anyway, you’re back now, so continue. What was it you were saying?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, what I was saying was that this was discussed when Elon Musk had his flame out against Trump a few weeks ago and then mentioned that:

 

“Well, why do you think the Epstein files haven’t been released? Well, it’s because they implicate Trump.”

 

Or whatever it was that he said. I don’t remember the words exactly. Well, there’s something to that because Trump and Epstein were like best buddies from the late 80s to the early 2000s. All these videos of them partying together.

 

In fact, Epstein even described Trump as one of his best friends in an interview in the 90s. Trump said many great things, positive things about Jeffrey Epstein, including:

 

“Jeffrey Epstein. You know, he’s got a he loves the women, particularly those on the younger side. He’s a lot like me.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what he actually said?

 

Joel Davis: Something like that. Okay, yeah.

 

I can’t remember the exact quote, but it was something words to that effect. I can look it up.

 

But the reason why they fell out in the mid 2000s. I shared a really good post on this by Devon Stack, also known as Black Pilled, was because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to buy some mansion in Florida somewhere like Palm beach or something, and Trump outbid him and got the place off him. And it ruined their friendship. Jeffrey was pissed off that Trump screwed him on some deal, took this place that he wanted to buy. And they fell out because of that. Not because Trump realised that he was a pedo or something or that he was a Mossad agent. Trump’s family have been long time friends of the jews. His dad was massive business partner to the jews. All kinds of awards from the jewish community in New York and guys that were doing the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing before Jeffrey Epstein were close friends of the Trump family and so on.

 

So this connection between Trump and Israel goes beyond just money. It wasn’t like Trump just got bought out by Zionist owners. The connection goes much deeper and much further.

 

But my point being that, yes, even though Trump is a massive philo-semite and a supporter of Israel. You know what Israel are asking for at the moment is go and start a war that could potentially destroy the entire American empire. Because we would like you to. It’s not actually necessary. Like if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they’re not going to use them against Israel unless Israel shoot them at them first. Like Israel has 200 nukes. Like Iran’s not going to just start lobbing nukes crazily at Israel and get itself nuked into oblivion just because they’re angry anti-semites or whatever the fuck they’re saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would give Iran leverage obviously though, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would basically protect them. It would deter Israel or America or whatever from fucking with them in the way that they just did, but to a larger degree in a way that could actually destabilise the regime there. So it’s just an act of self defense the fact that if they were to build nuclear weapons, so it’s ridiculous!

 

And then Israel’s complaining about Iran not following certain protocols. Israel hasn’t even formally acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons even though it has 200. Everyone knows that they have about 200 nukes. Those nuclear weapons were illegally stolen off the United States. There’s a lot of, is a lot of credible evidence that the reason why JFK was assassinated was because he was trying to stop Israel getting nuclear weapons. He was an opponent of their nuclear program. He didn’t want them getting nuclear weapons. And then look what happened to him.

 

And then Israel is not a signatory to the non-Proliferation Treaty. Pretty much every country in the world in the 60s and the 70s there was a decision made, okay, we’ve got to like stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. Obviously it was a bit of gate-keeping by the Soviet Union and the United States, but they were saying let’s stop, let’s shut down nuclear testing. This could be really bad for the environment. It slowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons and most of the countries in the world have signed up to it. Israel never signed it and Iran did. Iran has signed it.

 

So they’re trying to hold Iran to account for rules that they refuse to adhere to. It’s just insane! Like it’s the chutzpah of these kikes. So it isn’t necessary. Like from Israel’s standpoint they’re just greedy. They’re just like, they can see their enemy is in a weak position. They’ve knocked out a lot of its or kind of defeated groups like Hezbollah. They’ve knocked out Assad’s regime in Syria, which is an ally of Iran.

 

[30:17]

 

And so now they’re just trying to take a swing for the throat or they think they’ve got a chance. And Trump’s like:

 

“Fuck! Like, this is the last thing I need right now!”

 

He had like 5 million people in the streets protesting his presidency the other day. There’s the beanner anti-deportation riots happening. This happens. And then so many Trump allies, like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and so on, come out against Trump, against the war.

 

And a lot of the base, a lot of the people who support Trump, like what Tucker Carlson is saying, like what Steve Bannon is saying, like what even further Right commentators, people like Nick Fuentes, whatever, what these people are saying, Alex Jones. A lot of big commentators in the United States came out against this and the people were with them, particularly young people. So, it’s politically a disaster for Trump, but then also it’s geopolitically just like the last thing that they need right now.

 

And then, not to mention economically, like, if they went to war with Iran because of what it would do to oil prices and so on, it could completely fuck up the economy in a very serious way. So there’s just like this cascading set of crises that would be unleashed by it, which is why he was keen to just try and get it over and done with and move on and re-establish the status quo that previously existed. Because it’s kind of like a nightmare situation, no matter how much he loves Israel.

 

And I think that’s why what happened, happened. But it will probably flare up again before the end of the year because Israel is going to force the issue. Iran, I mean, they’re probably trying to make nuke secretly now. I saw a good article written by someone, I can’t remember who it was. I sent it to you like the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know you did. I know which one you’re going to reference.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the one saying, obviously Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans have indicated, just build your nuke secretly and then test them and then flex your muscles because no one will touch you because North Korea’s got a bunch of nuclear weapons pointed at South Korea. Matter how much international condemnation there is of their regime, people just accept that it’s just, it exists and there’s nothing you can do about it. And that’s probably what Iran should do and what they’re probably going to try and do.

 

And apparently they’ve still got some of the reports that came out were saying that they’ve still got a lot of enriched uranium hidden somewhere, that they’ve still got reactors hidden, like hidden in other places that weren’t blown up, or that the Fordo site wasn’t destroyed properly, etc, etc.

 

So what happens in three or four months when the Israelis and other war hawks for war with Iran start leaking things to the press saying Iran are building nukes and they’ve rebuilt one of these nuclear sites or whatever? Like, Trump can call it fake news now, but, like, he probably will respond to that kind of pressure.

 

And so then what if, you know, Israel kick it off again, then what? Seems hard to imagine this situation would just magically go away.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think jewish people have overplayed the Holocaust card? Because I noticed that Netanyahu, in his speech justifying his initial attack on Iran, he said something to the effect of, we can’t allow Iran to nuclear Holocaust us. And then I read an article that was published by Sky News from the, I believe, CEO, who was it? The CEO of the Australian jewish association or something? I think it’s probably just a guy at a desk. It’s nothing serious. But he was published by Sky News. And in the article, I’m pretty sure he mentions Holocaust like five or six times. And I’m thinking, and I didn’t actually read the article, I just wanted to count how many times he mentioned the Holocaust. And I’m thinking, am I the only one doing this, or am I the only one so worn down by the overuse of the Holocaust term because of the politics that I’ve been into? Or is everyone starting to feel this way? Is everybody starting to notice? I don’t know if this is something that people could relate to, but it’s just the justification for everything.

 

Remember that journalists, the Australian journalist, I think he was from ABC perhaps, who interviewed that spokesperson from Israel and said:

 

“So Israel is allowed to have nuclear warheads because Holocaust?”

 

And the spokesperson got really offended and actually walked out of the interview. He’s like, you’re being disrespectful. I’m not doing this interview, right?

 

So I can’t be the only one that’s noticing it. If even ABC journalists are noticing it. Like ABC journalists, I think, are notorious Leftists in Australia. People don’t like them very much. They’re generally very politically biased and even they’re sick of Israel. Jewish people just using Holocaust to justify everything and anything. What do you think? Do you think the general public, the population, do you think for them the Holocaust is starting to become a bit of an eye roll.

 

[35:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think you’re seeing it more with Leftists. They’re dismissing the Holocaust. Not that they’re not denying that it happened part. They’re dismissing it on the issue of Israel. I saw a clip from, I think it was Piers Morgan show and Piers Morgan has kind of been inviting on, he’s kind of seeking out controversy with his show. He’ll invite on people that will often debate the Israel-Palestine issue from both sides and he’ll try to interview like Andrew Tate or people like that because he’s going for clicks.

 

And anyway, I can’t remember who the jew was, but they had Anna Kasperian, I think her name is. She’s on the Young Turks program. She’s like Left leaning, like Bernie Sanders, supporting Democrat, but obviously she’s anti-Israel. And her rhetoric. I’ve noticed, I’ve seen quite a few clips from her and she’s a pretty popular commentator in the United States on the Left. Her rhetoric has gone to like full on like ZOG, like it’s a Zionist Occupied Government. Israel control our government. It’s not just, oh, these Christians and White supremacists hate brown people or whatever or these crazy Christians with this insane biblical theories about Israel. It’s like a direct, like Israel, the Mossad, they control our government. What’s going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, blah, blah, blah. Talking points that you would hear on the far-Right from people that we associate with. Right on that specific issue.

 

And anyway, the jew, she was debating about whether what’s happening in is in Gaza constitutes a genocide or something like that. He brought up the Holocaust and he’s saying this is not a real genocide. Real genocides are like the Holocaust. Like that’s a real genocide and that’s what happened to our people. And she was like, shut the fuck up! I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. How you guys just keep using that. I don’t care about the fucking Holocaust anymore. You’re doing a fucking genocide now! And that’s kind of interesting. You’re seeing that sentiment more from Leftists.

 

And then at the same time was a great exchange between Senator Gerard Rennick and some jew on Twitter that I posted a screenshot of the other day. The jew said:

 

“My family was wiped out in the Holocaust and for over 2,000 years my people were persecuted everywhere they went!”

 

Blah, blah, blah.

 

And then he just kind of shot back with:

 

“I have Celtic heritage. We’ve been persecuted for 2,000 years since the Romans touched us up. Did we go on about it, no, no one cares about your claims of 2,000 years of persecution!”

 

So it was nice to see Rennick fire back too.

 

And so you’re seeing more emboldening from people that are., … Because the anti-zionist, anti-Israel position is now becoming dominant. Basically people under the age of 40, people who get their politics primarily from a media diet of social media rather than mainstream media. Most people are anti-zionists, whether they’re Left-wing or Right-wing. It’s the only thing both sides can seemingly agree on at this point is fuck Israel basically. And yeah, so I think you’re onto something with that. I don’t think the Holocaust is really kind of maintaining the same kind of mystique that it once had.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I mean, I’m seeing people who I know, clients, relatives of clients. Like I’ll be in the middle of a job and one of my clients will say:

 

“Oh, my brother just sent me this.”

 

Because we talk about politics in a light hearted way.

 

And it’s like a meme, you know the Jaws movie, how there’s a picture of the shark kind of looking up at the I think it’s a woman, or a man swimming on the surface of the water and someone’s just changed the shark to a giant nose and it’s jews instead of Jaws. And he’s like showing it to me, laughing at me, sorry, laughing with me about it. And I’m thinking, this wouldn’t have happened five or six years ago. This is the sort of thing you would only find on Telegram five or six years ago. Now it’s just everywhere and standard people are laughing about it. This kind of anti-semitic meme propaganda.

 

So I’m not sure where that’s going long term.

 

However, I did have a thought. I believe it was yesterday or the day before. I started thinking about why we were censored from X. And I shared my thoughts with you on this briefly as well yesterday, I think. To summarize, I said if all this stuff is allowed on X, all of this, like Nazi material, anti-semitic memes and so forth, then why are we banned? Like, what does that say?

 

Basically, I realised that it’s probably part of a deliberate system to ban the options, because regular people, it’s always effective for regular people to start changing their opinions in favour of what we stand for. Obviously that’s effective, but it’s only effective up to a certain point because people, at the end of the day, they need to do something with that opinion, they need someone to vote for or they need a group to join, they need a party to join, they need to start paying a membership for an organisation, they need to get involved or they need to at least vote for someone who has a bit of a plan. But if they remove all the people with a plan, if they delete the options, then it doesn’t matter what kind of content people are exposed to. If they can’t do anything with the opinions that content is forming in their minds, then it doesn’t, it just doesn’t matter. It doesn’t actually translate into real or affecting real political change.

 

And I think that’s the whole point behind the censorship, at least. What do you think? Because you’ve got people like Nick Fuentes, they’re still allowed on X and there’s other influences and podcasters and so forth. But that kind of ties into what I’m saying, because what are they doing to affect political change? They’re sitting in a studio just talking shit, which is fine. It doesn’t really solve any problems, does it? It doesn’t give people options.

 

But anyone who comes forward as a real option, representing a real new nationalist solution, a new political party that’s actually going to challenge the two party hamster wheel in your respective country or region, then you’re banned, then you’re censored in clusters, all of your colleagues were involved, everyone LinkedIn gets banned at the same time, usually at the request of the hamster wheel two party system in your respective region. What do you think about that? Do you reckon that’s what’s going on?

 

[41:55]

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely, I think, yeah. Basically everyone who tries to set up a proper organisation, a party in particular, that people can rally behind, we all got mass banned only when we started making noise that we’re going to start a political party. And I don’t think that’s a coincidence. It was partly because we were gaining kind of lift off with popular resonance and things like that as well.

 

But yeah, you notice a similar thing in Britain. I’ve seen a similar thing, you know, where like all the Patriotic Alternative guys all got banned all at once when they had some successful public action.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s the thing, they’re an option. It doesn’t matter what people’s opinions are if they can’t vote for someone or join some group that’s presenting themselves as an option, a solution. So if the options are banned, I think that’s the game. So everything just becomes content for the sake of content where you’re just scrolling your X feed and you’re seeing all these great funny, Nazi, anti-semitic memes, but there’s no one you can actually, you can laugh with your friends about it and stuff, but you can still only vote for Liberal or Labor. There’s still no known organisation that you can actually join because you don’t know about anything like that going on. Because everyone who represents anything like that gets censored instantly.

 

And I think that’s the way censorship will continue to pan out moving forward. Plenty of memes, plenty of content, but you’ll just be expected to sit there drooling on yourself, consuming that content, and there won’t actually be an option for you, despite your changing opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so they don’t mind people talking about the problems, but they don’t want anyone putting forward an actual solution.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s changed though? Because they used to hate people talking about the problems. You used to be banned instantly for even trying to bring the problem up.

 

So why suddenly don’t they care about people? It might be that they’ve realised people need that option. And without the option, it doesn’t actually matter what people talk about or what they consume.

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s just that the ability for the powers that be to impose the level of censorship that they were getting away with a few years ago has declined.

 

There’s been a resurgence in the value of freedom of speech. They overstepped the mark. They started going after in America in particular, where all these platforms are run out of, they started going after conservatives, like main mainline conservatives that are not even that radical.

 

I mean, they banned Trump from Twitter for fuck sake. They banned like a sitting president from the platform. So they overstepped the mark.

 

And so then there was a course correction where the American Right asserted freedom of speech and asserted itself on these platforms. Elon Musk buys Twitter. They set up Rumble. The kind of information space gets shifted. Zuckerberg also kind of personally shifted more to the Right.

 

And so this TikTok which has run out of China, there was a changing landscape that emerged that these sites were forced to adapt to.

 

But at the end of the day, when it comes to Australia or Europe or even I think in America where I saw examples of this, like I remember when the National Justice Party existed in the United States, like they all got banned and then you couldn’t even post, like at this, at this point, you can’t actually post our website on Twitter.

 

But I remember that that was true for their website as well. So they really target.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s your White Australia website, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Correct. White Australia.org or WhiteAus.org, both are banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when that party actually gets registered? Well, then can it still be targeted for censorship to that degree? Where we can actually be posted on a public social media platform where there’s millions of Australians are joined up to that platform.

 

I mean, they talk about election interference through social media, but that’s exactly what these social media companies do against anyone, you know, right of centre. Usually the greatest election interference is happening amongst X staff right now.

 

But yeah, as I said, it ties back into the sort of perspective that I had over the last couple of days that the whole agenda is to ban the options, is to let people just talk about whatever they want now. To give people the illusion of freedom of speech. But nothing that they can actually do with that freedom of speech that’s going to affect the course of politics in their region. Sit there and watch some streamer, say some stuff about Hitler and wring your hands together and feel good inside about it, laugh about it, get excited about it, but then you still got to go vote for red or blue.

 

At the end of the day, that’s all there is. Anybody else presenting anything else, especially nationalistic, in essence, they get nuked, they get censored, and I think that’s the way the system will slug on forward into the future.

 

[47:11]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I can imagine like say we have World War III against China. I could imagine the system being allowing a lot of anti-Chinese racism to profligate online and in fact encouraging it and having propagandists that frame the war in terms most amenable to people like you and I actually support a war with China. I don’t support starting one, but I support it if it’s necessary. I support trying to win if it happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously.

 

Joel Davis: And so that could be a good opportunity for us. But like there’s going to be times where, like racism is valuable for many reasons. Like they obviously allowed people like us to run amok on the site in the lead up to the last American election because they’re trying to get Trump in and they knew that the more swastikas and sunrads that were posted on Twitter, there’d be more votes for Trump with young people and it worked. So they try to channel racism for their own ends. It’s the most powerful force in politics. So it doesn’t surprise me at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the most powerful force in the world. Racism. Racism is kind of the precondition for the development of all living things, isn’t it? It’s like woven into nature that surrounds us. Like, racism is probably the most foundational reality of this physical plane where we live. It’s the basis for all life. You don’t see any magpies running around pursuing crows because they want to be more diverse. But yeah, I can understand that. Racism is obvious, obviously leverage, but it’s done in a smart way.

 

I don’t like to believe that I’m just playing into the agenda of American, you know, political brains, though. I mean, all I was doing essentially on X was, I suppose, supporting and trying to legitimize. I mean, I’m part of an agenda as well. I’m part of a political agenda. It’s quite obvious the agenda I’m part of I like to think that I’m part of a good agenda. I’m trying to popularise and legitimize the White Australia movement. Right. I believe that there’s nothing wrong with being a White Australian.

 

And I think that could become a popular talking point in the future, especially when White Australians start becoming a minority or when things get so bad that you can’t go down to a shopping centre without potentially being raped or stabbed by a coloured migrant from Africa. Already we’re dawning on that reality now.

 

So the agenda I’m part of, because I’m part of it. I’m not directly linked in, I’m not an active member, but because I’m someone with a voice people listen to and I was creating content to try to translate what you guys were doing for the ordinary viewer. Well, that’s enough reason for me to also be taken out with the rest of the guys in censorship. You know, it’s frustrating because you know what? I won’t get into it. I’m not going to sook about censorship because if I was in control, I’d be censoring my enemies as well, straight up. I wouldn’t be giving people ideas.

 

Joel Davis: Need to figure out how to adapt. That’s why it’s important that people clip and re-upload the show, for example, and re-upload stuff that we post. When Blair posts a video on Telegram or whatever, re-upload it on other sites, enable our voice to keep getting out there regardless. That’s invaluable to circumvent the censorship that we’re under.

 

But also we just have to adapt. I think building the political party will give us strong standing to get back on a lot of these sites and to normalise ourselves in.

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that irritates me most about it is just the whole concept of democracy. I would be more satisfied with this whole ordeal if the Australian government, the people within Australian government just came out and said:

 

“Hey, we’re not allowing these opinions. We’re censoring certain opinions. We’re banning certain political ideologies. This is not a democracy anymore!”

 

I’ll be like, okay, at least I know where I stand. But they keep parroting bullshit and trying to present themselves as something that they’re not. You know, that they stand for these democratic principles that they don’t stand for. So they just lie to your face. While in reality there’s like counterinsurgency departments that exist purely to harass and censor political dissidents in this Australian democracy. And that’s what frustrates me so much, because you do your best to obey the law. You do your best to hold to the principles that you were raised to believe in the principles of being fair, diplomatic, you know, principle of free speech, not being violent, all that kind of stuff. You observe all of those rules, social boundaries and laws, and you still just don’t get any rights. It’s like you still just get censored, harassed, de-banked, followed. You get police knocking on your door, asking you about the political party you might be joining in the future. You know, it’s just a complete Police State down here in Australia.

 

And so it just pisses me off that they can’t just admit that that’s what they are. I suppose Chris Minns is the one who’s come closest to actually admitting it. The premier of New South Wales, he said that, hey, we can’t basically, can’t have free speech in this multicultural paradise because it might hurt feelings, and we can’t have that. So free speech is cancelled. He didn’t say it exactly like that, but that’s basically what he believes. I can respect that more than what some of those other assholes passing themselves off as politicians, whatever people’s representatives are actually presenting themselves. As actually still pretend that they’re living in some sort of democracy or are members of a democracy. There’s nothing Democratic about Australia. I don’t know. Do you agree, Joel? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, they pretend that we live in a liberal democracy.

 

[53:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you chime in, sorry, I know I just passed it to you and I’m starting again. The real test will be whether or not you guys can actually register your political party and participate in this so-called democracy. You know, that’s going to be the real, the big reveal as to how free and Democratic this so-called Australian democracy is because I’ve got a feeling they’re not going to let you do it.

 

But with Chris Minns right now, I brought up Chris Minns, he’s under a bit of fire right now, isn’t he? Because his staffers have been called to account for their role in imposing new Hate Speech laws. Basically tampering with Australian law to make it more difficult to criticise jewish people. Changing vilification laws specifically I think all on the back of the caravan hoax.

 

But now his staffers actually refuse to show up to the initial inquiry, which they’ve got to show up to it I think if they’re summoned.

 

So the arrogance of Chris Minns’ office, the staffers in Chris Minns’ office has led to what I think might be potential arrests. What’s going on with that, Joel? Have Chris Minns’ staff has been arrested or are they going to be arrested? Do they have to come to court? What’s the next step there?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what happened is that the, we talked about it on the show last week that there was the Legislative Council which is like the Upper House of the state government, they are doing an inquiry, an official inquiry into what happened because obviously the day that they’re passing these laws it’s coming out that this thing is a hoax and they’re ramming them through anyway. And we talked about it at the time.

 

Not only was it a hoax, it was literally paid for by foreign state actors, almost definitely Israel basically paying bikies to conduct false flag anti-semitic terrorist attacks to create a pretext to change laws to make it illegal to criticise jews or make it illegal for White people to criticise any minority groups basically in Australia.

 

Anyway, the role that Chris Minns’ staff has played is being subject to the inquiry because they’re alleging that they knew about it well ahead of time and deliberately concealed the fact that it was a hoax in order to ram this stuff through and only allowed it to kind of come to the surface after that successfully secured a passage through the state like the Legislative Council. Now it’s kind of become interesting because basically they subpoenaed them. They said you got to come and answer our questions. They refused to show up. They all refused to show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: So now it literally didn’t show up. They didn’t refuse. They didn’t write ahead and say:

 

“Hey, we’re not coming!”

 

They just didn’t even answer. There was just empty seats on the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re still refusing to show up. So why, if they’ve got nothing to hide, why can’t they show up? Why can’t the members elected by the people ask them some questions about what they were doing? What are they trying to hide? Obviously something.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you know, Chris Minns was interviewed about it recently and he said:

 

“Disappointing, concerning and massive overreach for his staffers to have to actually explain why they tampered with Australian law on the back of a hoax.”

 

It’s disappointing, concerning and massive overreach to be held accountable for changing Australian laws on the back of a hoax. That’s what he said. Not word for word, but that’s what he was alluding to in an interview with a journalist. Imagine that. Imagine believing that you’re free from any accountability, that you can just pass laws based on lies and hoaxes behind the back of the Australian people.

 

And then when you’re held to account for it, oh, you’re a victim. This is massive overreach. This is disappointing. How dare you ask me to be to answer your questions. That was Chris Minns’ reaction and he’s been having a dig at Mark Latham too. I saw in a recent clip. Why is that? What role is Mark Latham played?

 

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I’ll get to that.

 

The bottom line is that they have no respect for law. Like legally they have to show up and answer questions if they’ve been subpoenaed. And they technically within the power to issue arrest warrants. They haven’t been issued yet. I think these things are being stalled because of the political connections between Chris Minns and the people that are ultimately responsible for issuing the warrants or not so Chris Minns is basically just trying to shut it down through favours and back room deals and so on. So we’ll see if that’s successful.

 

But yeah, the Liberal Party in New South Wales, they refused because initially guys like Mark Latham and some of the other Right-wing minor party members in New South Wales, they tried to push a motion to repeal the laws entirely in light of the revelations. The Liberal Party refused to help them do that. But the Liberal Party then agreed to doing an inquiry because Liberal Party knew it would create a shitstorm for Labor. Like what is happening now, which would be good for them in the polls but obviously they’re in the pocket of the jews. They don’t want to actually repeal the laws. It’s a typical Liberal Party where they pretend to be on our side but really complicit.

 

[59:01]

 

But anyway, obviously Mark Latham is Independent. He was on the One Nation ticket. He got kicked out of One Nation for rampant homophobia, for basically. Which was quite funny. Remember we talked about it at the time on the show like two years ago when yeah. He quite graphically described how disgusting anal sex is in response to some homosexual politician that criticised him.

 

So anyway, Mark Latham, he hates poofters. He’s increasingly seeming to hate jews. Well not really but you know he did call out the jewish lobby. He said that Chris Minns was emboldening the jewish lobby, that the jewish lobby has too much power and so on. And Latham is one of the front men of this inquiry along with the other Right-wing minor party legislative councilmen who are trying to hold the government to account.

 

And so it’s a bit of political theatre. Chris Minns is accusing Mark Latham of advancing nefarious anti-semitic conspiracy theories and so on. And Mark Latham responded on Twitter this evening to a clip of that posted by Australians versus the Agenda declaring:

 

“Chris Minns is his bitch!”

 

So that was quite funny. I guess he’s out for blood. He’s trying to take Mins down. He sees this as a political opportunity to take the hatchet to the knee of Minns and his government.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, now’s the time to put the pressure on. Minns needs to be exposed. He needs to be embarrassed.

 

Anyway, anyone can put the pressure on him now, they should do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And at Mark Latham he recently got lost a court case for damages against this homosexual. I think he was from the Greens, Alex Greenwich, I think he was the member for Sydney. So he was voted in by all the Oxford street faggots into that position, I presume. Yeah, a judgement was held that he has to pay him half a million dollars in damages for just simply stating that anal sex is disgusting! What the fuck kind of country do we live in where it costs half a million dollars to offend a homosexual by declaring anal sex is disgusting!

 

So I think Mark Latham has a bit of a kind of punished aura at the moment. You know, 20 years ago he was the head of the Labor Party. He almost became prime minister. Now he’s getting tossed out of One Nation for being a homophobe and, basically getting bankrupted by the system.

 

And so what has he got left to lose? He might as well take on the jews. He might as well do some damage to the ruling elite while he’s still got a position. So good on him. I think it’s funny. Mark Latham defended The Noticer when they did a notice, a hit piece saying that Notice The Noticer is a neo-Nazi psyop, basically. And, yeah, he’s kind of flirted more with, like our guys on Twitter. Mark Latham’s a bit of a cuck on race, or more than a bit of a cuck. He’s a cuck on race. He’s not a true nationalist, but he does seem like he’s somewhat of a real human being.

 

And it seems like he kind of tried to be an establishment politician and kind of was chewed up and spat out through a long [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe the reason Latham’s not an ethnic nationalist is because he spent all his time around White Parliamentarians and he just can’t stand you know, [chuckling] so it’s pretty hard to believe in your own race when that’s the extent of the experience that you’ve had with your own race is White Parliamentarians. I don’t envy his kind of company. There’s another way. Latham, if you’re watching this, there’s another way. It doesn’t have to be Parliament.

 

Joel Davis: Well, actually, I’ve seen Mark Latham Fed post on Twitter when he’s had a few beers. He’s basically said:

 

“We need a revolution to overthrow a corrupt ruling establishment.”

 

And so on.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he must be there. He must be almost there!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it does seem, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It takes some of us longer to get there, but there’s no shame in that.

 

Joel Davis: It does seem like Mark Latham is, yeah, he’s kind of become alienated. He tried to do it all the right way, supposedly according to the rules of the old paradigm. He was a true believer in social democracy or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what happens! That’s exactly what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: Now he’s a jaded, old goat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would be sort of feeling the same frustration that I feel I suppose where you’ve been raised to adhere to these principles, you do adhere to them.

 

But then the same people who kind of claim to uphold those principles and stand for those principles, they just chew you up and spit you out through all sorts of underhanded tactics. He called me once when I was at the height of my activism, because he had a show I can’t remember what it was called. You might remember he had like a podcast or something going on.

 

I can’t remember what it was called. But I was just working on a job site I think in Eltham. He rings me and he goes:

 

“Blair?”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yes.”

 

And he goes:

 

“Mark Latham.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“G’ day mate, how can I help you?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Yeah, do you want to come on the show?”

 

I said:

 

“What show is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“My show.”

 

 

And I’m just like:

 

“Can I call you back? I’m just in the middle of something.”

 

Because I was on a scaffold like trying to repair this eaves that was like hanging past the scaffold and like I was kind of balancing. But he seemed to get offended. He’s just like:

 

“Yeah, right.”

 

And he just hung up on me. Then I tried to call him back and he didn’t answer. I don’t know, maybe he’s having a bad day. But that’s the extent of the interaction that I’ve had with Mark Latham. He’s got grumpy bad energy. He’s got the grumpy old bad energy he does.

 

[1:05:03]

 

Joel Davis: But he’s kind of like one of the few politicians that actually has like red blood in his veins. The only time I was in, I never spoke to him one on one, but anything resembling a conversational context was him just ranting at a conference I attended a few years ago, ranting about how Julia Gillard was a lesbian, how her so-called husband is a beard, that he’s a homosexual himself and that faggots have taken over Australian politics and lamenting this fact, which was quite humourous.

 

But what Latham tweeted last week that kind of provoked things was him saying two jews on Sky News saying, quote:

 

“The fake anti-semitism narrative must stop. Might be better to stop legislating when New South Wales police say none of those arrested have anti-semitic ideology. It was a con job set up by mobsters. Minns emboldened the jewish lobby and now it’s out of control.”

 

So we’re seeing Australian politicians call out the jews probably for the first time I can remember in my lifetime having multiple Australian politicians call out the jews directly. It does feel like a bit of a sea change. John Lawson posted a picture of Mark Latham standing over John Howard and aggressing with his hands and like getting in his face. And Latham’s replying to that, he’s replying to other nationalists. Someone said:

 

“Wait a minute, is New South Wales politics actually getting interesting for a change?”

 

And he said:

 

“We ride to the sound of the guns!”

 

So Latham’s on the war path. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore! It’s pretty funny. Funny thing, these old politicians that got chewed up and spat out by the major parties kind of like turn. And it’s the smartest politicians. I think Mark Latham and Gerard Rennick are the two highest IQ politicians in Australia and they’re the two that are calling out the jews. So what does that say?

 

Blair Cottrell: They might, Rennick and Latham might want to read the chapter of Mein Kampf where Hitler explains what happens to someone with real ability who goes into Parliament. Not just someone with real ability, but someone who genuinely holds to principles, who wants to stand up for their country. You should read what Hitler has to say about people like that that go into Parliament and how Parliament just basically becomes a mob to destroy them and get them out. Because in order to survive in Parliament, you need to be a rat without principles! You go into Parliament with principles, they all basically unite against you to get you out. That’s essentially what he says, but he says it much more articulately, he writes it much more articulately than that you can read it for yourself if you want.

 

Joel Davis: But I love, though, how there’s this emerging kind of renegade like cast in Australian politics, which was previously quite boring and monotonous. We don’t agree with them on everything, but people like Latham, people like Ralph Babet and a few of these other guys that are kind of at least causing problems for the system, and that’s kind of our aspiration, I guess in politics is to kind of join the team and push things even harder and faster and further. The kind of outsider team of Right-wing disturbers and chaos agents, just going Joker mode.

 

And I think Aussies love that kind of thing. Aussies love an underdog, Aussie’s love sticking it to the man, all that type of thing. So I think that would actually make politics interesting to have a kind of cast of colourful characters, you know, engaging in that more in the years going ahead. And I think that’s probably what we should aim for on the Right-wing of politics is to develop that because that could be the kind of catalyst for meaningful change.

 

Because as I said, as the reason why I was talking about international politics earlier is World War III is on the horizon. It might not be next week, but it is on the horizon. And when that moment arrives, all bets are off. It’s going to be a total reset of politics. And after World War III is over, is everyone going to be focused on World War II anymore? I don’t think so. there’s going to be a whole new World War for everyone, for the whole world order to be rebuilt around. And the animating myth is going to be all the horrible things that the chinks did to us and so on, rather than how bad the Holocaust was. It’s going to be a total reset of the collective psyche.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are in post World War II fairy tale land, aren’t we?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s time’s almost up. Like there’s almost no one alive that remembers World War II at this point.

 

And by the time World War III is over, there’ll be barely anyone alive who remembers it, but everyone will be remembering what just happened. And what would have just happened is a race war against the Chinese, from our perspective. We’ve got 1.7 million chinks in our country. They’re all going to have to be put in camps or something worse. They’re not going to be able to be trustworthy members of Australian society anymore. There’s going to be a division by race. I think it’s going to be a total reset of our collective values. We’re going to pretend that men and women are totally equivalent at wartime when we actually have to go boots on the ground in the hundreds of thousands and fight to the death? I don’t think so. I think everyone’s going to come back to reality. They’re going to have to, they’re going to have no choice.

 

[1:10:34]

 

And so this confrontation with reality is coming.

 

And so our job is at the moment is to try and get ready for that. Because a lot of people are black pilled because they think that the current paradigm, this kind of monotonous slow grind is just going to continue on ad infinitum forever. Nothing’s ever going to happen, nothing’s ever going to change and we’re all just going to go out with a wimper. That’s not how history works. That’s not what’s going to happen. There’s going to be a major crisis. Everything is going to get blown up and remade. All of our values are going to get reset in the coming generations. And the work that we’re doing now is setting the table for that next generation to eat. Like we’re getting things ready for the paradigm shift which is on the horizon.

 

So people need to think like that if we have a movement established, even if it’s just tens of thousands or 100,000 men and we’re only getting a certain percentage of the vote and we have one or two guys elected or something, we’re going to at least be in a position to make the most of the coming crises, to grow and gain influence and gain a seat at the table. We want to have a seat at the table at World War 3 from the Australian political perspective. We want to have a seat at the table because in order to conduct World War 3, as we said before, what’s the most powerful force in politics? Right? Racism! That’s the main force you’re going to be able to channel in the Australian people to get them to fucking fight. And we are the arbiters of racism in our country. We are the vanguard!

 

So we’re going to take on a very different role in our society from just being these hated, despised, controversial outsiders. We’re going to end up becoming, we’re going to have a completely different relevance in society in the coming decades.

 

So we have to get ready, we have to get building and time is running out. We need to get serious. The next few years, it’s indeterminate, when all hell is going to break loose. But it’s going to happen soon.

 

So yeah, and the Anthony Albanese’s of the world are going to get wiped away. They’re not going to survive. We’re not going to be electing gay nerds into office after World War III. It’s going to call for a completely different kind of politician politics in general. The whole social attitude will change. The men who come back from World War III are going to come back embittered, but also entitled. They just went and fought to the death for the future of their nation. Are they going to come back and just allow it to be fucking given away to women in pants suits and fucking Indians? I don’t fucking think. So I don’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think when all of that comes about, you’re a little bit frozen up, by the way, I can hear you fine, but your camera is just all frozen up. And it’s not just for me because I’m noticing someone in the comments mentioned it too. But watch all the other races in Australia and probably throughout other Western countries, watch them all suddenly be on their best behaviour when that situation with China that probably will turn into a new World War eventually comes around, because suddenly White people will begin to become more conscious of the fact that they are White and that they have their own ethnic interests at stake. And outsiders are going to become easier to recognise. Because with that basic introduction of the anti-Chinese racism that you say will become kind of a central feature of life during that time, you know, naturally we’re going to start recognizing other people who aren’t like us as well more easily.

 

And all of those arrogant Indians that are currently boasting about taking over certain regions in our country, all the Africans who are on home invasion sprees and murdering doctors in the hills, happened just last year. A young 17 year old was just convicted of that a couple of days ago in Melbourne. All of these people, I think will suddenly be on their best behaviour, and it’s going to be an interesting shift, interesting change.

 

I’m not overly excited about anti-semitism being a mainstream thing again because I know that that’s how things pretty much always were throughout the history of Europe, at least before the Second World War, leading up to the Second World War. Basically every country was anti-semitic as a general rule. I mean, Christians just generally understood that jewish people weren’t to be trusted. There was an understanding that jewish people weren’t generally friendly to Christians. I think that was mostly prevalent throughout Europe. And I’m sure there were times in some countries where that consensus, that understanding kind of became less prevalent and then something would happen and people would realise the reality of the situation again, because you’ve got times where kings in England, for example, like oh, now the jews are okay. And then 15 years later they’re kicking the jews out again. But the jews know how to live. They would have necessary, or how should I put it? They would have essential blood memories. So they know how to survive in environments where anti-semitism is rife. So I wouldn’t get too excited about it.

 

But it is exciting to consider what the world would look like, what Australia would look like if White people redeveloped a bit of ethnic consciousness. That’s what I’m trying to say, in essence. And that’s really all that I want to see in my lifetime.

 

I mean, I don’t really want for much. I would just like to die having seen a country filled with my own people who know who they are and know who their enemy is, who are able to recognise outsiders and threats. So I feel like I’ve died having served some sort of purpose, you know.

 

[1:16:14]

 

Joel Davis: Sure. I think for Americans the jewish issue is more central because that’s the kind of centre of jewish power in the world is the United States. And they exercise a lot more influence over American political and cultural life.

 

Blair Cottrell: That Zionist, that Judeo-Christian mythology, whatever you want to call it’s kind of popular in America, isn’t it? Maybe not so much as it was 10 years ago, but there’s still that, yeah, God’s chosen people thing going on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously there’s that. But even beyond that, just jews occupy a very prominent role in American life. Like, even though they’re like 3% of the population, they’re massively over-represented in media.

 

So if you’re watching podcasts, like there was the Leather Apron Club videos where he went through all the big podcasts, like all the big political podcasts, Tim pool, Joe Rogan, etc, etc. And he was going through them all and it was like a third plus of the guests on all these podcasts were jewish. Even though they’re only 3% of the population, they’re over-represented in the kind of tastemaking culture setting domains.

 

And so they have an outsized influence on American culture and political life, not to mention all the money that they’re putting in. And this is true on the Left-wing and the Right. It’s not just like the religious Zionists or whatever. Jews are more influential probably on the Left than on the Right in America in many ways, because just of how the majority of them are Leftists in the United States.

 

So that’s a big deal for Americans. And also primarily it’s the American military that’s getting dragged in to fight Zionist wars and so on. Like, we get kind of dragged along, but it’s kind of a secondary thing for us. It’s more primary for them. So it’s a more prominent issue for them.

 

But the reason why we did The jews Hate Freedom protest before Christmas last year, it wasn’t just because of the topical nature of that issue, which obviously it was primarily about, but it was because I think that’s the best way to frame the jewish problem to Australians in the current year, which is what is the jewish lobby primarily pushing for in Australia? The main thing that it’s pushing for always is hate speech legislation. And more and more attacks on our freedom of speech. Every single time anything happens, jews come out into the media and demand more arrests, more laws passed and so on. They want to shut us down. And Australians value freedom, and so they don’t appreciate this small minority trying to take away the freedoms of the rest of us because of their own hysteria and their own lack of ability to take criticism.

 

So I think that’s the strong frame and I think it’s a strong frame for Americans as well, I mean, there’s jews clamouring in the United States to take away their freedoms as well. And there’s nothing, there’s probably no value that Americans hold more dear than liberty.

 

So the kind of jews versus freedom framing I think is the best framing. You know, last week I criticised Sam Hyde for going on a podcast and trying to frame the problem with jews as:

 

“Well, look at the genocide that they’re doing in Palestine. Do you want to pay for that with your tax dollars?”

 

And it’s like, that’s probably convincing to like Leftists who sympathize with browns. But like, we should be talking about what jews are doing to us! Like how we are negatively affected by jewish institutional behaviour, not other groups. You know, who gives a shit about Palestinians ultimately, other than bleeding Leftists, not that many people or like Muslims, but like, who does the average patriotic White Australian care about themselves? Ourselves. So it needs to be framed in those terms. And you know, a lot of the problems that are occurring in Australia, they don’t boil down to jews. Like the problems with mass immigration and so on. Jews have played a leading role in advancing mass immigration and multiculturalism and so on. But it’s not just the jews.

 

Like, it’s a coalition of different groups, whether it be the housing industry, whether it be ideological Leftists and globalists, whether it be other, like non-White minority groups in their lobbying efforts or voting blocs or whatever. There’s a coalescence of anti-White forces in our society.

 

But on the issue of free speech, jews are playing a massively outsized and prominent role in attacking it. So on the one hand they try to portray themselves as:

 

“Oh, but you know, Israel’s a free liberal democracy. And if you oppose Israel, you’re allying yourself with these communists and Muslims who hate freedom and liberalism.”

 

And so you’re like some backwards, you know, fascist or something. That’s how they frame things. But it’s ridiculous! That’s such a weak frame. We need to smash through that framework and say:

 

“No, we’re on the side of freedom. You’re on the side of tyranny!”

 

If you’re not doing anything wrong, if the jewish role in society isn’t a problem, if what Israel’s doing isn’t a problem, why can’t we talk about it? Why can’t you just sit down and debate it and defend your position openly?

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you care about the Holocaust, Joel?

 

So what you’re saying in essence is anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge.

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean by that?

 

[1:21:49]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m sort of like borrowing a Christian. I don’t know if it’s a Christian phrase or it’s actually from the Bible, says:

 

“Fear of God is equivalent to the highest knowledge.”

 

It’s true in religion maybe, but in politics anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge. You would think that you go into life thinking that any kind of prejudice any kind of stereotyping a person is just prejudice. And you’re not going to give yourself to that kind of brutal nature of thought.

 

But then the more you actually pay attention, you realise there’s a good reason for stereotypes, ethnic stereotypes in particular, and that there’s anti-semitism for a reason. It’s not just because people are idiots. It’s because people have observed the reality of a nature of a certain group of people for a very long time. [chuckling] It’s like that people continue to engage in certain practices, continue to behave in a certain way which leads other people to be somewhat hostile to them for their own purposes, which is usually a natural response.

 

So I think in summary, you could say that anti-semitism is the result of a lot of acquired knowledge. It’s not just some knee jerk reaction springing from prejudice or bigotry, as they try to frame it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the problems associated with the jewish community and its influence over our society, it actually requires like careful study and analysis. It’s not something which is like directly evident. I think people who have a more superficial view of society, they tend to not have very strong opinions on jews. They’ll be more upset at other groups that are more prominent and public facing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you hear? Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? That’s probably one of the reason the jewish people aren’t so prominent and public facing.

 

Joel Davis: I think a we’ve talked about on the show before. I think it’s a big mistake for them. They’re shooting themselves in the foot. They should shut up and retreat into the background. If they truly aren’t doing anything wrong, shut up and retreat into the background and allow us to have our race war with the Indians and the Chinese and the Muslims and all these other groups and retreat into the background and pretend to be on whichever side is winning, you know. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do like the way like the standard jewish merchant that I’ve had dealings with in construction in the past. I do like the way they don’t flaunt their wealth. It’s one thing that the standard average jewish character from the southeast region of Melbourne, like Malvern, Elston, Wick regions, you would never know that they were wealthy. But they do tend to have access to a great deal of wealth. Like they’ll own big car parks in the city, high rise hotel buildings or family members of theirs will own that stuff and they’ll have shares in it kind of thing. But they’ll drive the kind of cars, they’ll drive a Camry and they’ll be wearing tracksuit pants and a T-shirt from Kmart or just some button up polo from Kmart. You know, they’re unshaven sometimes you don’t, you would never know. These are the way a lot of the jewish merchants around Melbourne operate, operate. And I kind of admire that because it at least is an expression of ego control to some extent.

 

Because when you think about it, the people who wear the big fat watches and lots of jewelry and drive around in like $200,000 Maseratis, what’s the point of that? What is the point in flaunting your wealth? What’s the point in wasting money on that shit in the first place? Like, what are you actually trying to achieve? Like:

 

“Look at me, I’m really rich and special!”

 

Isn’t that just ego fragility? Just that you’re trying to draw attention to yourself.

 

Joel Davis: So if you’re a billionaire Blair, you’re telling me you wouldn’t buy a fast car?

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely wouldn’t. I would buy a nice Tiguan. I would buy a very nice Volkswagen Tiguan, because they’re a good reliable car and I would like a nice new, new sort of updated.

 

Joel Davis: I’d buy an Aston Martin. I’d buy an Aston Martin.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t want to be driving around in a car like that in the current climate though. You’re just going to, it’s probably just going to get stolen by Africans. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy nice things because they’ll be stolen by Africans.

 

What I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: Put it in the garage! How they’re going to get?

 

Blair Cottrell: But why do you need it? Like this is what I’m talking about.

 

Joel Davis: I want to do 240km an hour down the highway!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, but when are you going to do that? In the middle of the night when the coppers aren’t going to catch you.

 

Joel Davis: I’m doing 240. Good luck catching me. Plus, I got enough money to pay the tickets if I’m a billionaire.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, [chuckling] but you’re gonna get sick of that eventually. I mean, okay, that’s a hobby. You’re talking about a hobby, but I’m talking about why would you, like, walk around in lots of gold chains, jewelry, …

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t walk around in gold chains.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like express your wealth? Like, what’s the point?

 

Joel Davis: I just would like to drive a ridiculously fast car, ridiculously fast. Because it’s fun.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. But again, we’re just talking about hobbies. If you had a lot of money, you wouldn’t. If you had a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: I think jews are too neurotic, like:

 

“Oh, I’m gonna crash!”

 

Like, they wouldn’t even have the balls to go 240, you know?

 

[1:27:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I gotta admit, I don’t know. I mean, what’s the point in driving 240 or just for the thrill rush. Man! What I’m saying though, is I think the jews, not all of them, obviously, but the majority of them, they must be raised this way. Or maybe it’s just part of their genetic nature. They do seem to have good outward ego control where they don’t flaunt their wealth.

 

But it’s probably all part of their subversive demeanour. Right? So you don’t really expect much from them. It is very true that you never really expect much from jewish people. When you deal with them on an individual basis, they always seem kind of nervous and skittish and you kind of feel sorry for them. That’s the impact they’ve always had on me. You kind of feel sorry for them and so you’re extra nice to them, because this is long before I ever really knew what I knew about jews. So I do admire that one element of their disposition, which is they don’t tip, they don’t tend to flaunt their wealth. And they’re some of the wealthiest people you’ll ever work with or for, if you’re in whatever industry that you’re in where you might come across them.

 

Joel Davis: I think the main thing to admire about them is that they invest a lot of their wealth in the advancement of their community rather than just the advancement of themselves as individuals.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Joel Davis: There are a lot of Anglo millionaires and billionaires, like multi, multi-millionaires and billionaires in this country who don’t put one single dollar into the advancement of White Australia, which is why the country is being stolen from us!

 

The jews are 0.4% of the population and their lobby is so aggressive and powerful because they pay for it. They put their community first as a group. And you know, meanwhile a lot of our richest people are fundamentally making money off our replacement. Maybe they’re working in industries that benefit from cheap non-White labour or if they’re in housing construction, they’re benefiting from mass immigration or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes your eye roll thinking about your parents, doesn’t it? I mean, I love my parents, but the standard sort of White Boomer parents, all they really think about is their retirement, is retiring comfortably and spending all the money or wealth that they’ve generated throughout their lifetime on themselves at the end of their lives. Which people watching this might think, good on them.

 

I mean, that’s the phrase they use in Australia:

 

“Oh, good on them. They should be able to do that. They’ve worked hard their whole lives!”

 

Yeah, I get it.

 

But when you contrast that kind of decision making process with what the jews are doing, with what the Chinese are doing, with what pretty much every other race in this country are doing, it’s kind of retarded to just blow all the wealth that you have generated through your working life on yourself and Martinis and cruises and fine dining before you die while your children have to inherit the mess that you fucking leave behind! I mean, you got to admit that’s pretty retarded, right.

 

I think being a bit more collectivist and having a little bit more foresight, generational foresight with the money that you make in your life, if you’re a Boomer, might serve your nation to some extent.

 

And that’s right, someone says in the comments:

 

“They taught our people to think as individuals.”

 

That’s the problem. And the Boomers can be really bad for that. Like I’m not an anti-boomer sort of guy. I’m a bit of a Boomer appreciater it in a lot of ways, because they do work really hard. They’re an industrious people. They’re always trying to fix things. They don’t like to relax, they’re always working. But they’ve definitely been geared to think on individual basis and that’s why all they seem to care about is their retirement.

 

Joel Davis: The Strausshowe generational theory predicts that Boomers and Gen-X’s will be more individualistic because Boomers grew up at a time of great prosperity. They grew up at the time after World War II, where you know, society was on high, institutions were working incredibly well. There were incredible opportunities. They’re highly idealistic generation that challenged spiritually the values of the old order because there was no crisis for them to really, like, confront in their lifetime. So their politics or their cultural involvement primarily became one of spiritual dissatisfaction.

 

Then you have the Gen-X’s who are like more jaded individualists, where the Boomers are idealistic individualists who want freedom and liberation and all this kind of stuff. And so they’re very focused on how they can enjoy their retirement and waste all their money on garbage rather than thinking about legacy.

 

Gen-X’s raised with very careless parents. There they were raised as kind of like a forgotten generation. They’re incredibly nihilistic and cynical because they were raised after the Boomers who had this great idealistic project that totally failed, and they perceived that. So Gen-X’s think it’s all bullshit! There’s nothing you can do to change the system. Just, you know, advance yourself as an individual as much as possible. Just make money and do what you got to do. There’s no higher purpose or meaning to society or life.

 

And so these are the two generations that are kind of running the show at the moment because they’re the ones with the wealth and the power and the influence. And they’re very individualistic for two kind of different reasons in terms of polarity.

 

But what the this generational theory predicts is that for Millennials, that we’re actually, … And by Millennials, they. Their cut-off point for Millennials is later than what’s most commonly understood. So older Zoomers are included in this.

 

[1:33:20]

 

Basically, if you’re an adult now, if you’re at least over the age of 21, you kind of fall in this category. For our generation, we’re a lot more collectivist because we were raised at a time of decline. Society has been declining. The generation that came before us were nihilistic. They didn’t really believe in anything.

 

And so we’re not really kind of reacting to a false idealism. Instead, we’re responding to a kind of society of excessive individualism, excessive nihilism, and instead have a kind of inclination to form for collective solutions rather than individualistic solutions. So where, like Gen-Xers say:

 

“Oh, well, you got no chance in changing the system. Just try and make money and be successful as an individual.”

 

Millennials tend to be more supportive of collective political solutions to our problems and say:

 

“Well, how can I as an individual succeed in a system like this?”

 

And so Millennials are far more predisposed to socialist economic policies, for example, and more collectivist political ideologies, whether it be on the Left or the Right, than previous generations.

 

So as we kind of ascend and become take over the system in the coming generational cycle, because we’ll become the older people that are actually in charge of the government and in charge of everything, basically, our values will start to get imposed on society and society will move in that direction.

 

So that’s another reason why I think the future of the Australian Right-wing is not going to be talking, it’s not going to be promoting conservative libertarian style policies around:

 

“We’ve got to cut taxes and we’ve got to reduce the national debt and people need to work harder!”

 

And all this kind of stuff. What’s going to motivate Millennials in the political space is redistributing wealth to our generation, giving us free stuff, giving us basically making up for the fact that wealth has been hoarded into the other generations, making up and kind of restructuring the economy. Collective solutions to individual problems rather than individual solutions to collective problems, which is predominant within Generation X. Like, Generation X thought that Fight Club was like the coolest movie ever, because Fight Club was all like:

 

“Society sucks, man! Let’s just go and like punch on in a garage and like blow buildings up and like have sex that’ll be awesome and get drunk.”

 

Whereas, like, they thought Nirvana was like the greatest band ever because they were like:

 

“Everything sucks!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Whoa, that’s so deep!”

 

Whereas, like, Millennials are like, they don’t resonate with that kind of thing. Instead, Millennials are interested in, as I said, idealistic collective solutions, like, who is responsible on the collective level? How can we solve it on the collective level? Which makes sense why nationalism would resurge and socialism would resurge simultaneously within our generation.

 

So the future of Right-wing politics is a kind of nationalist Right-wing socialism. It’s not going to be small government, it’s not going to be doubling down individualism. Everyone is sick of individualism. Young people don’t want individualism. Young people don’t want to be told:

 

“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, go talk to her!”

 

And all that kind of advice:

 

“Get it done!”

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with individualism is you get too much of yourself under some sort of individualism or individualistic thought process system. You get too much of yourself and you get bored with it. You know we’ve had individualism, and look where it’s led individuals. Everyone’s on a plethora of script meds, sitting at home watching Netflix by themselves, paying off a mortgage by themselves, and just living in there in their honeycomb cell.

 

But I’ve got to bounce, man! I’ve got to bounce because I’ve got a really early start. I’ve got to get to bed.

 

Joel Davis: Can we do our four Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, if we’ve only got four, that’s fine. Yeah. Sorry, guys, if I’m sort of ending it abruptly, but I’m worried I won’t sleep tonight. And if I don’t sleep, I’m gonna have a really hard time tomorrow. I’ve got a bit of traveling to do tomorrow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was gonna get you to react to that Indian video, but fuck it! We’ll do it another time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I already watched it. The guy on your channel saying that:

 

“Hey, we’re taking over everything and we’re gonna marry your sons and daughters.”

 

Or something like that.

 

Basically, he was almost boasting that he was going to end up with like, all the Indians are going to get everyone’s sloppy seconds:

 

“You’re all going to get divorced, and then your divorced wives are going to get with us!”

 

He goes:

 

“Every Indian guy I know is with someone who’s not Indian!”

 

And I’m thinking, that’s not my experience. Every Indian I know is with an Indian. Well, it’s usually Indian men walking around in-groups looking for some girl to sexually assault. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, it’s just your take on it that you posted on Telegram was perfect when you said that basically, what the guy is relishing in is the fact that in his mind, White Australians are destined just to end up in the same ethnic situation that he’s in.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re downbred into the genetic slop that he is.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was trying to say, in a way, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s his, like, ideal revenge is that:

 

“Oh, yeah, you think we smell and you think we’re disgusting and you think we’re a slave cast of Uber drivers. Well, guess what your grandkids are going to be half Indian Uber drivers, too, and you’re going to be down here in the fucking muck with us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And there is a real vengeance, there is a real revenge sentiment amongst some of the Indians nowadays, I’ve noticed, isn’t there? Or just people who are responding to any sort of White nationalist talking point on TikTok or something like that you can see in their eyes, hear in their voice and you know, in their words it’s quite obvious that’s like they want vengeance. They want vengeance that they’re not White! They’re irritated that they’re not White! They’re irritated that White people are realizing that they’re White, recognizing the significance of that and starting to talk about it.

 

And all of these people are vengeful as a result! Let’s like, they don’t want that to happen. Obviously, it’s an existential thing. They’re worried they’re going to be sent back to their own countries, maybe.

 

[1:40:00]

 

Joel Davis: I saw a thread on Twitter by this Indian who posted. He said:

 

“Joel Davis, who hates Indians, well, he’s Irish and the Irish aren’t even White!”

 

And he thinks that he, … Anyway, I’m not even Irish, by the way. Full disclosure, I’m Scottish and English mixed together. Yeah, he was saying that apparently I’m Irish and then posted one of these those old like physiognomy charts from like the early 20th century where it showed like how the Irish kind of looked like niggers and being like basically, just like it was funny.

 

But then like, you’re not even White, you’re Irish. It’s like you’re a fucking pajeet. Like, even if I was Irish, you’re a pajeet! Like their main insult is like:

 

“Yeah, well you’re also brown. Like, you’re also a piece of shit! Like we’re both pieces of shit together!”

 

It’s not even like elevating himself up. It’s just dragging you down. It’s like when homosexuals try to like insinuate that you don’t like them because you’re secretly gay. It’s like, would that be insulting? Would me being a homosexual be something that’s disgusting and gross? Well, actually, I agree! It would be disgusting and gross if I was a homosexual. Interesting that you say that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve said it before. It’s hard to be offended by, it’s probably because you can’t say anything to a White guy to a reasonably well bred White guy, which I imagine. Well, I like to think that you and I are reasonably well bred White men. What can you say to us? Like that’s a racial slur that’s actually going to irritate us. What can you actually say? There’s nothing! What am I going to get offended by? What are you going to call me Casper or pasty or something? Like, okay, I’m fine with that. There’s just nothing that can be said that’s going to like, suddenly make me realise that I belong to an ethnic group that I despise or I’m trying to distract myself from. I’m not trying to distract myself from my ethnic identity. You can only get offended if you’re actually not proud of who you are. If someone’s like using a racial slur, that’s the only reason you could be offended.

 

But yeah, like you said, there’s always just efforts to drag you down with these people. Let’s move on though, because I’m getting to the point where like, I slept three hours last night. I don’t even know how I’m running, like, how I’m still awake for some reason. I’m still going.

 

But yeah, I’m on three hours and I’m only going to get five if I go to bed right now. So we need to get through these Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Well How’s it Going, said:

 

“Are you guys aware of the Australian band called Black Magic SS? They lean heavy on National Socialist imagery and themes.”

 

I am aware of Black Magic SS. They’re a doom metal outfit. And yeah, I think they’re pretty cool! Have you heard of them?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I’ve been to some gigs where bands like that have played. Are they Black Metal? I’m imagining they’re black.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, they’re not Black Metal. They’re like Doom Metal. They sound kind of like imagine if Black Sabbath was less pop sensible and kind of racist. More like mystique.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if I’ve seen them. I don’t think I have. I’ve seen some Black Metal bands that are into that.

 

Joel Davis: Like, yeah, obviously there’s heaps of NS Black Metal bands, but yeah, no, they’re not Black Metal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, let’s check them out.

 

Joel Davis: I think they’re Australian too, from memory

 

Blair Cottrell: Wiggle Do sends through $10. Thanks very much. He said:

 

“Lots of people want to be more racist than Hitler in NS circles. Where do you stand on Nuremberg Laws and mixed races? How do you draw the line between White and non-White?”

 

I think Joel’s mentioned this before in previous streams. It would come down to like organisational policy, I think, and different organisations would have different policies on that question. But I’m pretty sure the boys, Joel and the guys have their own policy on that, don’t you?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it depends on the genetic distance. So like, if you have like trace amounts of like blood black, like African ancestry or Aboriginal ancestry. Less percentage of that can be tolerated relative to if you have like, I don’t know, like trace amounts of like Middle Eastern ancestry or Asiatic kind of ancestries because they’re less genetically different. So it’s dependent on the what the form of blood pollution, what percentage can be allowed. The Nuremberg Laws were primarily just about jews. And in my opinion they were if anything a little bit too lenient. So does that make me more racist than Hitler if I mean I’m Australian?

 

Rigo Weber said:

 

“Does the NSN have monetary incentives for White families to have more children? I think this should be a high priority for the NSN culture to develop, especially to replace all the mass deported.”

 

What do you mean? Do we within our own organisation pay people to breed? No! We don’t pay people to breed within the organisation. We do have so many people from, …

 

[1:45:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: What I can see there’s a lot of encouragement to breed.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everyone’s having families. The reason why people aren’t having families is not so much about monetary incentives, it’s more about culture. If you have a culture that celebrates motherhood and you’re in a group of friends and associates where motherhood is valued and having children is valued, then the women pick up on that signal and go:

 

“You know what, I want to have kids too. I don’t want to be like some like sterile ageing, you know, wench, surrounded by all these fertile young women with all these babies hanging off their titties, you know, growing the next generation.”

 

So you know, if you develop a pronatalist culture, it kind of flows.

 

But in terms of like government policy, obviously when we put the political party together, one of our policies is going to be paying people to be carers for their own children. So like right now you have a situation where if you say you have a two year old, you’re a mother, you want to go back to work, the taxpayer, through the government, will give you a childcare rebate so the taxpayer will pay some Filipino immigrant to look after your kid in some child care facility surrounded by freaks and non-Whites and potentially pedos so that you can go and work because otherwise you wouldn’t be able to afford to work basically because you can’t even afford to pay child care costs for your own kid. That’s ridiculous!

 

But then if you’re a stay at home mom, you get nothing. It’s a completely perverse incentive. So what we’re going to do is reverse it and pay, fuck the child care rebate. If you want to go and work, you got to figure out who’s going to look after your kids if you can’t.

 

But if you’re going to look after your own kids, the society should pay you. We a collapsed birth rate, we need to have more White babies, we need to have more young Australian babies. And so we’ve got to make it economically viable for young families to have children.

 

So that’s going to be one of our signature policies. I think it’ll be very popular. I think women will like it. I think young men will like it too, because it takes the pressure off them too. If your missus is getting paid big money to raise your kids well, then raising a family on a single income becomes possible again. Say she’s getting 70, 80 grand a year from Centrelink and then you’re out making 100 grand a year or whatever. Now you’ve got a decent income so you can make a life for yourself.

 

Catenaria said:

 

“What are your thoughts on human rights? The right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Are they inherent and universal? Should they be protected?”

 

I don’t believe human rights exist. They are not inherent, they’re not universal, they’re social constructs. Should we construct them within our societies is a different question. I think within White societies, the maximum amount of freedom that can be apportioned to your population without compromising the security of your nation, should be afforded.

 

So I don’t think we should give freedom to communists, to traitor elements within the society, to, or definitely not to foreigners, alien foreign interests in our society, trying to subvert it and undermine it. But I think normal White people should have freedom of speech and assembly and expression. Absolutely!

 

So, yeah, but they’re social constructs, which means that there’s nothing universal inherent about them. They were dreamt up in the 20th century. No one ever thought they existed before then, because they don’t. They’re just phantasms of the mind. They’re ideological constructs, they have no metaphysical basis.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, that’s true. But perhaps the essence of the question is, would you maintain any sort of semblance of human rights, like, let’s say you get everything you want and you’ve got a White ethno-state. Would you keep the concept of human rights, like, woven into Australian law, or would you?

 

Joel Davis: Not human rights. Not human rights. But I think having rights for the Australian people, specifically the White Australian People, they should have rights. We should guarantee their rights. But enemies of the nation and foreign alien interests should not have rights. Fuck you! Go create your own country somewhere else and get them to give you rights. Our government is responsible for securing the rights of our people, not anybody else. And we could make. And we could respect the rights of like all White people, let’s say with got cousin nations around the world and we can respect their rights and they would respect our rights and things like that. But it’s a construct, it’s a decision, it’s not an absolute!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be more concerned with conducting myself with dignity and strength rather than arbitrary concepts. Abstract concepts like rights to life, liberty, freedom of speech. These are all very, I don’t know, you’ve got to understand that when you have concepts like that that are available to everyone in a specific country, then that country becomes receptive to external threats, subversion. People are going to use those rights against you. They’re going to get into your country and they’re going to use that shit against you. So that’s a problem. There’s a bit to unpack there.

 

But this is the kind of thing that you sit around a table with some other very learnt people and you discuss where the boundaries, where you’re going to draw the line with stuff like this, and how you’re actually going to define your state form. Because I don’t like concepts like the ones that were enshrined into the basis of Australian democracy. You know, the ones I grew up with, as I explained earlier in the stream. Because they’re all bullshit! And they’re just used by enemies of our country to subvert and exploit our country and extract the wealth generated by the Labor in our country and send it overseas and you know, get up to all sorts of mischief in the process. To the extent where our children. The greatest thing our children contend with in public schools is:

 

“What gender am I?”

 

You know, all of this has been the result of freedom of expression and human rights and stuff like that. Right. That’s just opened the door for all manner of subversives to come into this country and work their bullshit magics. So like I don’t go for that kind of stuff. But I do believe in honour, dignity, being fair. I believe in harsh punishments, but fair punishments nonetheless. I believe in consequences, that kind of thing. But as I said, there’s a lot to unpack here, isn’t there?

 

[1:52:21]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I also believe that thinking of rights only at the level of the individual is wrong. I think groups have rights if we’re going, … And I don’t think rights exist metaphysically. I think they’re constructs.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they don’t! But that’s why I said you need to sit around a table and like, determine what the rights are.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But I think groups need to have rights too. When we sit down and we say:

 

“Okay, well, individuals want to have rights.”

 

Okay, but groups need to have rights. So the nation needs to have rights too. The nation needs to be able to say:

 

“Well, this is what the nation needs in order to survive and to maintain itself. And those rights need to be respected.”

 

And in some respects they impair upon individual rights. So like I wouldn’t in a kind of, in the ethno-state, normal, healthy White people, if you want to marry another normal, normal, healthy member of the opposite sex, okay. I don’t think we should be like micromanaging that. I know there’s some eugenics spergs who think that, but I think that’s kind of really unromantic and inhumane. So okay, but then like, if you fall in love with like, I don’t know, an African woman. No! Like, we’re not going to allow that. That’s disgusting! Just like if you fall in love with your dog and you want to marry your dog. No, we’re not going to allow that either. That’s fucking disgusting!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’m sure the African women aren’t akin to dogs? You’re talking about an actual animal versus a different, …

 

Joel Davis: Rather have a dog in my house, to be honest, than a fucking African woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. [chuckling] Yeah, what did you say before that? What was unromantic or inhumane? Oh, like you gave an example.

 

Joel Davis: Allowing free healthy White people to marry whatever member of the opposite sex they want to marry. I said:

 

“I think restricting that too much is inhumane, unromantic.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, so you’re a romantic?

 

Joel Davis: We had like eugenics doing the like, nerd calculations on the genetics and we’re like:

 

“Computer says you’ve got to like marry this person!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well let’s create a scenario somewhere in the middle. Let’s say that a White guy wants to marry Arab woman.

 

Joel Davis: Well, no! Because you’re violating the rights of the White Australian nation to perpetuate itself. You’re poisoning the blood of our nation. It’s not about you.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re interfering with free will. And you got to understand when you ban something, you kind of make it in a taboo way more desirable to the darker nature of people. So you got to be careful with outright banning shit like that! You’ve got to discourage it and put social pressure on them.

 

Joel Davis: You know it used to be illegal in Australia, right. You know, miscegenation, like mixed race marriages used to be illegal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, I get that. But I think it would be more effective if, …

 

Joel Davis: Does everyone find it super desirable to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australian society right now, the way it is right now, and you just outright ban miscegenation now, I don’t know, I think you’d almost make it even more taboo. And you know when you tell a child don’t do something, you ban a child from like watching a certain TV show for example, that they kind of want to watch, then going to try harder to watch it.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you can do it, but you can move to their country and do it. I mean we want to kick them out of our country. So how are we going to let you bring in non-Whites into our country just because you want to marry them? If you want to marry them, you’re going to go to their country and marry them. But we’re not bringing in a bunch of Filipino wives into Australia and creating all these hapa franken children. Go to the Philippines if you want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. Again, at the very least, I don’t want to say illusion, but the idea of free will I think is still an important thing, because you need to show White people respect, they need to believe they have free will. I think a necessary amount of social pressure can be put on people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if you want rights, like if you want the nation to give you rights, you also have to respect the nation’s rights. So if you’re going to violate the nation with your rights, why should the nation continue to defend your rights? Doesn’t make any sense. It’s not reciprocal.

 

So like if you want to go in and like breed with foreign people that we deem collectively [words unclear] we’re going to expel you from the nation, you’re no longer an Australian. Take your passport and you can fuck off!

 

[1:56:39]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you’re still giving the person the choice, but they have to relinquish the privileges that they’ve obtained by being Australian in order to violate the principles of the nation. I understand that. See, that’s fair. Yeah, I suppose I’m with you on that one. I just get a little bit, because I’ve always valued my own, my own autonomy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like the thing is White guys with Asian wives. So often I see a critic on the Internet of us and our ideology who seems like a normal White dude, and then you click on the profile and you see the Asian wife almost every time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you always click on the profiles of your critics to check their posting?

 

Joel Davis: On profiles all day? If I was always clicking on them I’d be doing it all day.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Do you have any critics who you take seriously, though? Because most of the people who criticise you are not like serious critics. They’re just people that don’t like you for some reason. They don’t like something you said. Have you got any serious critics that you can, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re not really critics. I mean, I’ve had debates with people that I respect over the years who, where there are interesting debates on a particular issue. Like, I debated like the Russia, Ukraine thing with a lot of people, and I respect people that have different opinions on that issue or various other issues. I don’t think every issue is so cut and dry. And it’s interesting to hear out two positions on a lot of issues.

 

But then there’s when people are just kind of vitriolic and just hate you for emotional reasons, there’s nothing that interesting that they’re saying, you’re not really dealing with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I meant. Like, is there anyone who really stimulates Joel Davis, a critic that you consider to be roughly equal, who actually gets your brain moving, you enjoy actually arguing with them? Is there anyone like that?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t found good, I used to have more people like that. But I haven’t found many good opponents lately.

 

I mean, I had a good little like, text debate with Keith Woods a few months ago. That was fun, where it was actually like a more substantive debate. But yeah, it’s hard to find good, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes wish I disagreed with. I sometimes wish I disagreed with you more on things so I could argue with you a little bit more. You would run rings around me usually.

 

But when I’ve had a good sleep and I’m in the right mood, I think we could have some really good mental clashes. I know that you kind of thrive on that kind of stuff too. I’ve noticed. Like, I watched last week’s stream with Ninja. I watched most of it and I thought to myself, next time Ninja comes on, he should try to contend with you on a few things or at least ask you to explain things further. Maybe challenge you once or twice, because I’ve noticed that that’s what really gets you going. You need that oppositional force to reckon with joel Davis: Yeah. I like debating. I like entertaining two sides. People are saying Drew Pavlou. I mean, I would go on Drew’s show if Drew wants to. I know he’s live streaming, like, every day now because he’s trying to stack Superchat coin. If he wants to get some views. Here’s one for you guys that are on Twitter. Go tell Drew Pavlou to extend the invite if he wants to have me on casual stream. We can debate things. We can discuss what’s going on in Australian culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Drew, if you’re watching this. I don’t really know you that well. I don’t click on your profile. I’m not even allowed on Twitter. But it’s 100% a good idea. It was one of the most entertaining things I’ve ever watched. People into politics, they watched that debate that you did with Joel and thought it was really entertaining. I don’t think you could go wrong if you want to actually produce good content. I think you and Joel being in the room together again could be really good!

 

Joel Davis: Wouldn’t have to be in the room together. Like, we could just do like a Streamyard stream on his YouTube or whatever. But he’s streaming all the time and he’s just getting random people from Twitter on there. He’s getting guys that are like nationalists and stuff on there. He seems like he’s happy to talk to anyone.

 

So, yeah, someone clipped this. Drew, if you want to have a conversation, if you want to debate the issues of the day, discuss the issues of the day or whatever, a bit of content. I think it’ll get views, reach out, someone put us in touch. Let’s tee it up. I think it’d be interesting content. You know, I find Drew to be an interesting guy. He’s wrong about a lot of things, but he’s got a fun personality. I like his style. I find him to be a humourous interlocutor.

 

So let’s have a chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s got lot of mental energy. I’ll give him that. He’s got a lot of mental energy. He posts on X like, 40 times a day.

 

Joel Davis: People are saying that it froze up when I said that. Is it still frozen?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. That’s why I was laughing, because you’re like someone clipped this and it’s just like a blurry 144p.

 

[2:01:55]

 

Joel Davis: For fuck’s sake! I don’t know what’s going on with my Internet this evening.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, man, we got to wrap it up. I gotta go. I’m sorry, guys. I’m having a good time!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Modern World Reject said, he threw a big Roman. He said:

 

“Indian stink!”

 

That’s the last Superchat, so we’ll end the show there.

 

Also, someone in the chat said debate Mike Enoch. Well, if he wants to have a discussion, I’ve had him on before.

 

Blair Cottrell: If I heard that Mike Enoch talks some shit about, not talked some shit about you, but how to go at you for your take on Iran, Israel situation.

 

Joel Davis: I think that was vindicated. Yeah, my take, that was vindicated. So look, I haven’t actually listened to that podcast, but people told me that too.

 

If you want to have a discussion, Mike. Yeah, I’m a fair guy. I’m happy to listen to his point of view. We agree on a lot of things, on most things. So be a fun conversation. Click this. If I’m not frozen, send it to the TRS guys, happy to talk to Mike, but yeah, I’m an open minded guy. I’m a fair guy willing to debate and discuss the issues.

 

So let’s talk about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before we, before we finish up. We’ve got a question for you. Is boredom a problem for you? Because I’ve realised you get like, you just have a brain that moves all the time. It’s always ticking over. It seems to be that way. Do you ever feel bored or like you’re battling boredom? Is that an issue for you?

 

Joel Davis: Not really. Only if I’m like forcibly subjected to something which is boring. But if I’m free to do my own thing, I’m never bored.

 

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re on your own, if you’re like spending periods of time during the day by yourself, like you’re not the sort of person who needs to distract yourself or find lots of things to do or think about. Like, you’re always okay with your own company. You’re always fine sitting there with your own thoughts, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just, I feel like I don’t get enough time to myself.

 

Blair Cottrell: But yeah, no, I can relate to that. Yeah, it’s actually a good sign. Yeah, I noticed a lot of fixed personalities are like that. Like they always want more time to themselves and they seem to benefit by spending time with themselves. And I definitely fall into that category. I feel like I fall into that category, too.

 

But anyway, thanks for joining us, guys. We’ll see you guys next week, I guess. I’ve got a big weekend, so take care. Anything else, Joel, before we finish?

 

Joel Davis: No, just White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour! We’ll see you all next time.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you later, guys.

 

[2:04:38]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2025 = 21 )

BeamRider101
1 day ago
Foreign operatives paying criminals to stage hoax terrorism, to then get our speech laws changed, then the people in government changing those laws, failing to show up at the inquiry, is outrageous, normally it’d be instant dismissal and total overhaul of the government, but they appear to be getting away with it again.
11 likes

Report
BradC1988
1 day ago
Ban black cunts, not knives in Australia.
10 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
JFK was a real American
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
21 hours ago
The First Catholic POTUS
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
21 hours ago
Disgusting
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
China was created by jew with stolen intellectual properties just to create today’s war situation. All is pre-planned as covid was to murder legally especially young American solders, but to depopulate and destroy world usurious economy. Traitor Tramp is jewish puppet bitch. This all proofs that nothing would be changed through jew voting scum and evil democracy.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Canada does the same thing, calling a homosexual a f-g is a $10,000 fine or jailtime.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Did China turn on the jews under Ci Jinping?
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
mharrison52
21 hours ago
seeing us congressman calling for war with China, id say there’s a good chance. china is close to being nat soc if you really think about it.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
Now it the time to register Party and nail jew for good to the coffin once and for all.
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
22 hours ago
When Whites become a minority in AU there won’t be any special privilege for minorities like there is now… In fact, persecution will go into full blown legal discrimination. South Africa is the canary in the coal mine.
3 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
blurryish
2 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
24:05 Blair that was fucking hilarious
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
I was laughing so hard at this my sides hurt
1 like

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
hey guys
0 likes

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
what time u starting u cants?
0 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
good enough guys
0 likes

Report
BigotSmalls
Supporter
1 day ago
LFG crew. ORG keep up with the conversation. Like share chalk.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
First 25 minutes of the show: Eldridge Colby policy William Colby his grandfather was head of CIA Anglo Americans, CIA was an Anglo organization but was couped by jews during WW2 and after JFK 1963/ replaced under LBJ Eldridge was in 1st Trump Admin and told them that China must be focused on at all costs or America will fall. His policy is intuitive, Netanyahu violated this policy by striking Iran. China is top supplier to Iran. Netanyahu is greedy and wants greater israel and cannot accept backseat. Iran is stronger than israel, and Net wants to sack US to defeat Iran. US public does not support this war. Not to mention Israel trade relationship with China.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
21 hours ago
Your description of Gen X is lacking in understanding and knowledge… Probably has a lot to do with your millennial sense of entitlement.
0 likes

=================

ODESSY COMMENTS

22 comments

HyperChat minimums:
100 LBC
0
Doom Nebulae
16 hours ago
Why the fuck would you go fight China on behalf of ZOG?! This is beyond stupid.

6
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike Enoch is obviously jewish in his physical appearance, and it’s confirmed by his jewish ex wife.

1
1
Hide replies
King Tut
4 hours ago
fuck Mike Enoch! every time he opens his mouth, all I hear is verbal diahreah. he is the reason why I could never get into TRS.

0
1
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
If you would like to broaden your purview on just how long, the US and us by proxy, have been subverted by Israel, the watch the last 2 episodes from Blackpilled.com

2
0
Reclaim
5 hours ago(edited)
some indian guy came to my office once and kept trying to show me his fancy watch and I was like dude, I really don’t care about such things.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike peinovich is jewish.

0
2

@EverybodywakeUp
2 hours ago
Blair hit it on the head with boomers, my mum is a boomer and she works so hard. Since she was 16, she can’t not work and always wants to be busy.

King Tut
5 hours ago
Jews aren’t just overplaying the holohoax card, but the “Nazi” card. recently at a US Senate hearing Kristi Noem and Ice were compared to “Nazis hunting down Jews” by some Jew or shabbos goy. it was pathetic! they basically saying you aren’t allowed to deport invaders who broke our laws and came to US illegally because if you do, you’re a “Nazi”.

Cecil
5 hours ago
china will take Taiwan without a shot. They have been infiltrating it for years and putting their own people in place

1
0

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Also, you mentioned there being ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian Agent. I am not saying he is or isn’t, go watch the documentaries The Dubious Friends Of Donald Trump and Active Measures. Trumps deep financial ties to Russian crime and even Soviet actors goes back to the 80s and his close ties to Russian mob are undeniable. So, please review that information and revise your position. This is embarrassing.

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Your take on Taiwan is painfully misinformed. It is as if you are getting your information from people like McGregor and Ritter, two literal Russian sycophants. The COMMUNISTS didn’t fight alongside the Chinese Nationalists in ww2, they fled to the mountains, and when the war was over and the nationalists were beleaguered, they came down and took over. Taiwan was NEVER NEVER NEVER Part of the the CCP. Fuck China, Fuck Duginist multipolarity. Dugin is Anti White and Anti West, and youd know that if you actually listened to his long format interviews. He and Putin say their commitment to multiculturalism often. Let me guess, 4D chess? They have to say it? Forgive me if Im wrong and you know that he is a multiculturalist. Real reform looks like taking back our countries, not destroying them so 1 billion Chinese and 1 billion Indians can take over, and we get raped and killed in the aftermath. There is ZERO chance that have a Renaissance if we fall into disrepair. Our planned genocide is on the table, and will happen the second we become a punching bag for the world. Honestly, go get your information about taiwan from other sources than RT stooges or American politicians on the take from China.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
have a good day everyone

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks guys o/

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
He admitted it himself

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
^^^

Walther Mauser
1 day ago
Yep, Nature is racist. It is only natural.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
anti septic

warren-g
1 day ago

@ConeOfSilence
the last one was pretty good

Callaghan
1 day ago

@Daniel
1 day ago
Best show of the week coming up boys

@Daniel
1 day agoAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE

Callaghan
1 day ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: No Blair tonight. It is the 3rd of October 2024. Blair’s got some things that came up. He couldn’t do the show. Blair and I might do a stream, though, maybe Sunday night or something to make up for that, but nevertheless, gotta have a show for you guys this evening, and you got a show with Tom and I, so should be good. There’s a lot to discuss. It’s been an interesting week in global politics, at least, you know, things to Israel, European politics, etcetera. Yes, some interesting things I wanted to discuss.

 

So there’s a lot on the agenda.

 

First of all, I guess, like a place to start would be, we could talk about, obviously, things have kicked off where Israel about a week ago, they did a pretty extensive bombing campaign in Lebanon. They managed to take out the leadership of Hezbollah with that bombing campaign.

 

And then they did a, I don’t know if you would call it an invasion, but they went over the border into Lebanon and they’re doing, their military is active fighting Hezbollah within Lebanon as we speak.

 

And obviously what made a lot of news was the fact that Iran sent over a shitload of ballistic missiles into Israel. They blew up a few, I think, air bases and some other things inside Israel, Israeli air defenses, which are state of the art, thanks to American taxpayers, weren’t able to intercept, because they Iran has hypersonics. I think that they got them from the Russians or something that are pretty, like high tech.

 

So the situation is pretty heavy. Shit has kind of escalated from just what it was for the past year, where it was just a kind of war in Gaza against Hamas. Now it’s going to the next level. And this really shouldn’t be something that we’re that concerned with, but it is something that we should be concerned with purely for the reason that there is a sequence where this keeps escalating to the point that you get an American intervention, and if there’s an American intervention, that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran. Or maybe they deployed troops to fight Hezbollah, maybe war kicks off in Syria, and that could also rope in Australians as well. We’d probably send troops if something like that happened. And that is quite concerning.

 

Obviously, we don’t want to expend any White blood for fucking jews, particularly after the shit show that was Iraq. We don’t want a repeat of that. And I think this time around it would probably be more brutal.

 

So that’s on the horizon. I’m not predicting a war. I think it’s a low percentage chance, but it’s nevertheless a possibility. And I think what’s also interesting about this is the way that there’s a reaction within the domestic politics of Western countries. Like, let’s bring it back to Australia. We’ve seen a lot of the Zionist conservative element be very forceful. There were protests in Sydney. People were waving Hezbollah flags. And some Arab chick was charged with terrorism offences for waving a Hezbollah flag. It’s illegal in Australia to support a listed terrorist organisation. I think they can actually use maybe the same legislation or similar legislation to what they’ve used to ban NSDAP symbols to go after them specifically for the Hezbollah symbols. I’m not so sure about that. Might be different legislation, but anyway, it’s relevant.

 

The point is its pretty testy. Peter Dutton has been out and very forceful in defense of jews, in defense of Israel, holding the Left’s feet to the fire on the issue. And we’ve seen a lot of Zionists that align themselves with the political Right in this country, basically coming out demanding that the Muslims are deported. Not all Muslims, necessarily, but any Muslims that participate in any of these anti-Israel protests.

 

And so that’s quite interesting to kind of break down and analyze. And even, like, Drew Pavlou, who apparently was on the left, and when I debated him, he’s like a wholesome chungus, you know, multiracialist now. He’s almost, like, sounding like hard Right. Because that’s how much he shills for Israel.

 

So it’s kind of interesting to dissect the hypocrisy of that, I think, and analyze it where it’s incredible how the conservative movement can organise so staunchly in defense of jewish interests and the jews.

 

But, you know, crickets when it comes to White Australians, actual Australians. And what concerns us and what the fuck does Israel have to do with Australia? Like, seriously, like, it obviously has nothing to do with Australia. It’s just jewish capture, jewish elite capture of our political institutions.

 

So what do you think about this, Tom? I see you made some comments on Twitter, but how do you kind of take in the whole situation?

 

[05:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, a lot has happened. A lot has happened, but nothing has really impacted our lives at this stage. I did notice that in the US there has been a hurricane, or a flood of some sort that’s damaged a lot of people, and that’s been all over my timeline. And something that I think should be said is its so obvious. Well, I’ll give a bit more information. The National Guard is being deployed to the Middle East at the moment. And the National Guard is meant to be a line of defense for what we did when I was in the army, neo-SAS operations like non-combative evacuation operations, security and stability operations. It’s not really meant to be deployed to war zones. It’s more for like, domestic affairs. And this is the one time where it should be really, a lot of resources should be going into helping these people. But they’re sending billions to Israel for missiles. And their readiness level for their soldiers is not to help their own families but to go overseas. And I saw some screenshots from text messages from people saying, like, active service people in the US saying that they:

 

“Couldn’t go home, they couldn’t get leave to help their families or help their neighbourhoods because they’ve got to be on standby to get the Middle East because of what’s happening.”

 

So this is some collapse of Rome stuff. And I’m not saying that this is what is about to happen. I’m just saying that this general attitude that the US government has towards its people and all governments, all White governments or traitor governmentss have towards White people, they’re teetering on the edge of mutinies, mass mutinies! I’m not saying it’s going to be a mutiny overnight, but this behaviour leads to mutinies. You have to let people, soldiers and civic minded people, you have to let them clean up their homes first before they can go overseas and fight.

 

And yeah, there’s just a general zeitgeist, I think, for Whites globally, that’s very different to when the first Iraq war happened. The zeitgeist back then was quite anti-islamic from just a pure, visceral, you know, guttural dislike for Muslims. I still think that that dislike still exists. And it’s potentially even stronger because of the way Muslims have treated White people over the last, 20 years in our own countries because of the mass migration. I think that feeling still exists. But what it’s not paired with which it was definitely even as a weaker feeling, paired with a stronger sense of going over there and kicking some arse.

 

So when 9/11* happened [an Israeli false flag – Kat] and the 7/7 bombings in the UK and these terrorist attacks in the early 2010s, there was a huge civic patriot, anti-Islam movement to go overseas and kill hajis. And it was as explicit as that. I was in the army and probably 90% of the guys I was in the army with, that was their main reason for joining. It was they want to go to Afghanistan or Iraq and kill Muslims, like, for what they’ve done to the basically to Western civilisation. They weren’t really there to just like, get a meal ticket. That there was like, a racial, a subconscious racial mindedness to do it. I don’t think that exists anymore to. At the same capacity. It still exists, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near as strong as it once was, because there’s so many factors. I won’t even go into it. But it was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles. That was awesome to see.

 

 

[* See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

And I think a lot of people get caught up not saying that you’ve done this, Joel. I think you introduced the topic very well, but I have seen a lot of discourse online where people are saying that:

 

“Everything’s a psyop, nothing ever happens. Israel let themselves get bombed!”

 

And this was probably discussed on an earlier show. It’s like, that’s the wrong attitude. Why do we always have these people acting as if Israel and the jews are some omnipotent force? Yes, they’re very powerful! Yes, they have a completely disproportionate amount of power. Yes, they own the US government, they own the Senate, they own Congress, like, through AIPAC and the Federal Reserve and the media. But sometimes they actually can take a punch, you know what I mean? Sometimes a missile gets through and actually hits something and people saying oh, like there’s a lot of black pill. Whenever something happens, I don’t want to get too excited, obviously, because Israel’s been bombed a lot of times.

 

But, you know, Iran stepping up, when I saw it in my newsfeed, when it said that Iran is basically declaring a state of war and they sent those missiles, I thought to myself:

 

“Wow, I can sleep a bit better tonight. At least they’re doing something. [chuckling] That’s great!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When I would say, though. So followed it kind of closely, and I think Iran didn’t declare war on Israel directly. They bombed them. Yes. And you’re correct that the jews didn’t let the bomb get through. That was jewish cope. They actually blocked out on Google Maps or whatever the satellite footage, like the Israeli bases that got bombed so that you couldn’t see the damage from the satellite imaging. So why cover it up? And they said initially:

 

“Oh, everything’s fine. No one died and everything’s fine. They just killed one Palestinian. Ha ha, idiots!”

 

But then now the truth is coming out. And no, actually the missiles did do some damage. But at the same time, I mean just from a geographical standpoint, like Iran, it’s very difficult for them to do much to Israel because just for geographical distance, like there’s Iraq and Syria between them and Israel.

 

And so it’s a long fucking way! I don’t know if Iran even has carrier ships for their air force, but they wouldn’t be able to use them even if they did because the Americans are sitting there with their much better navy and much better air force kind of as a check on much of what they can do.

 

So, yeah, they can lob some missiles at Israel from a distance and blow up a few things. And that’s good optics for them. And it does restrain Israeli behaviour. And I saw that the French and the British basically said to the Americans and to Israel:

 

“We don’t want you to respond. We’re not going to back you if you respond, you’re on your own.”

 

Kind of thing. They don’t want to see an escalation.

[12:22]

And so I think Iran, they kind of played a strategic hand here. They thought that maybe because Israel is kind of in a precarious situation, it’s tied up, they can lob a few in and maybe get away with it and not get much of a retaliation. But if they were to continue doing it and continue escalating, it would get to a point where the US military would be brought in to then bomb the shit out of Iran in defense of Israel. Like, Israel can wear a few of these and be told by the Americans to wear a few of these. But if they keep escalating, keep escalating, keep escalating, there’s a point at which the jews can pull the strings in ZOG to make America bomb the shit out of Iran. And Iran, I think, is aware of that.

 

So it’s a little bit of an optics game where they want to look like they’re standing up to Israel and they have like, one strategic capacity, which are these long range, like, hypersonic ballistic missiles, but there’s a limited strategic benefit to them.

 

What is interesting, though, is that going into Lebanon, like, there was a lot of hype last week when Israel took out the leaders of Lebanon with their own bombing campaign, which showed that they had really good intelligence because they were able to pinpoint where the leaders were and take them out with aerial bombing. But Hezbollah are, like, 100,000 men, and it’s a guerrilla war.

 

So if they’re going to go into Lebanon, what are they going to do? Occupy all of Lebanon and systematically uncover 100,000 men and execute all of them? That’s totally unrealistic military operation.

 

So they can go in skirmish, try and do some damage to Hezbollah, try and use intelligence to identify where they’re holding some rocket storage facilities or whatever and take them out. But they’re not going to be able to defeat Hezbollah. It’s just not possible. And fighting against the guerrilla enemy with the conventional military is so difficult. Like, the Americans lost in Afghanistan for a reason and in Vietnam for a reason. It’s because, you know, guerrilla technique, when you have the sympathy of the people, creates a disproportionate, like, a massive disproportionate advantage against a conventional occupying force. Conventional force versus conventional force. It’s more of who’s the stronger power will win. But, yeah, with the asymmetric warfare, it’s very, very difficult.

 

And then the longer that this goes on, you have to remember, I had Mike Pinovich on to talk about this because he’s like a spurg about Israel kind of subject. So if you’re interested in his analysis, you can go watch that stream if you haven’t already.

 

But he was making a very accurate point I thought that while all this is going on, Hezbollah are lobbing rockets into Israel. Yeah, like, their rockets aren’t as good as the Israeli rockets or the Iranian rockets, right? But they still blow shit up. They can still kill people. And the jews that live near the Lebanese border, a lot of them, like, have had to evacuate from their homes or if you have businesses in that area that had to shut down.

 

And so there’s millions of jews that are their whole life is on hold while, like, shit is just getting randomly blown up all around them every night. And there’s, like bomb sirens going off all the time, and they’re living in fear. They don’t have a normal life, like a massive portion of the country.

 

And so, like, Israel has a limited window and under which it can conduct this operation. They can’t just go into Lebanon and fight a guerrilla war against Hezbollah for four years, because that means four years of random jews getting their houses blown up in Israel. And that’s just not tolerable. So like, what can Israel realistically do here? Like, they can go in, they can kill some people. A few of them will die. And also, Israel doesn’t have a massive military with a lot of forces. It’s a small country, like in population size.

 

So their high level, like special operations and, like the high quality, high grade fighters, they don’t have a lot. So their strategy has to be either dragging the Americans in, which is going to be difficult, because I think Iran will basically try to push as hard as they can without crossing a line that would drag the Americans in mixed, or basically they can go in and then blow some shit up and declare victory and then go back to Israel. And then Netanyahu probably gets voted out the next election, and the Israeli Left takes control and has a more moderate foreign policy. This whole exercise has just destroyed Israel’s international reputation and pissed off all of their enemies.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s huge protesting at the moment in Israel, huge protesting!

 

So they are in a difficult situation as to how they can escalate this war without escalating, as you said, there’s a huge percentage of, they’re living in what would feel like a war zone, or a prison. And because it is, and they’re locked in. Now, even though they’re not being directly invaded, they’re the difference between the Lebanese or the Palestinians or the Gazans and the jews is the jews are accustomed to a high standard of living, whereas the southern Lebanese, the Gazans and the Palestinians are accustomed to suffering. So they can tolerate a lot of stress and it only strengthens their resolve, whereas the jews actually can’t tolerate that much stress.

 

[17:50]

 

So it’s an effective strategy what Hezbollah and Iran are doing by just keeping them under constant stress without provoking America. That would really be their goal, because obviously provoking America is going to result in the B2 bombers coming over, the Stealth bombers coming over and just bombing Tehran, which is everything that all the power grid’s going to go out. Like, they’re going to try to send Iran back to the Stone Age, which is what all the Hawks in Washington are trying to go for.

 

But there’s obviously two factors at play. There’s the Israeli election and there’s the American election, and I think everything is really in this kind of, it’s not a stalemate, but everything’s in this kind of play on. They’re doing this kind of rigmarole. They’re playing war on the Lebanese border. Like I saw the footage today from the Special Forces soldiers going in. It looks like they wanted to get some. It’s not, as you said, it’s not a full ground invasion. They’re just looking to get in, probe, you know, they’re looking in to get some. And, yeah, they’re not going to get very far with that.

 

Regarding taking out the entire or the vast majority of the Hezbollah leadership. Obviously, the jews have good intel, and they would be leaning entirely, I think, on the Americans. I think the American intel, you know, would be the superior intel. The jews obviously, would have the backdoor to a lot of the Google, and a lot of the kind of modern tech.

 

But I think it’s the American spy network. The Americans just have so many spies on the payroll, and it would just be subcontracted out to. Well, Israel would be subcontracting their workout without paying, obviously. You know, the Americans do it for free.

 

So yeah. I also think it’s interesting that the media or the ABC [state run Australian Broadcasting Corporation], it sounded like they’re trying to defend Hezbollah. It shows you how Left-wing the ABC is when Peter Dutton* was speaking about that girl charged with waving the Hezbollah flag.

 

[* Peter Craig Dutton (born 18 November 1970) is an Australian politician and former police detective serving as the current Leader of the Opposition, holding office as the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia since May 2022. He has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the division of Dickson since 2001. Dutton previously served as the minister for Defence from 2021 to 2022 and the minister for Home Affairs from 2017 to 2021. He held various ministerial positions from 2004 to 2022 in the governments of Howard, Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison. Dutton grew up in Brisbane. He worked as a police officer in the Queensland Police for nearly a decade upon leaving school, and later ran a construction business with his father. He joined the Liberal Party as a teenager and was elected to the House of Representatives at the 2001 election, aged 30.]

 

Regarding that legislation, I’m fairly certain that when they made the recent amendment, they took out the ISIS flag, because originally the ISIS flag was on that amendment as a banneed, like as a designated sort of terror symbol. And they took it off, added the swastika and the double-sig runes, specifically the double-sig runes [SS symbol]. But I can’t remember whether they included the Hezbollah flag in that legislation. But I do know in previous legislation, they named, I think, two random, like, I think was like, Atomwaffen and Sonnenkrieg Division, which was like a Finnish Discord chat as, like the two neo-Nazi groups that were designated terror groups. Yeah, Sonnenkrieg Division isn’t real. It’s like, I think it was like a 15 year old on Discord that had a few, like, international people on it, and I think they just shared BT videos on Discord.

 

So anyway, Sonnenkrieg Division, and I think The Base or Atomwaffen got listed and then there was like seven or eight Islamic groups that were listed, and obviously one of them was Hezbollah. So that would be a separate legislation that would imply the symbolism of Hezbollah would also be designated.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Interesting times.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a pretty brazen thing to do, that girl.

 

I don’t know if you can get that up. Was a Noticer article?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I could probably get it up. I’ll pull it up in a sec.

 

But you know, on the subject I also want to make this take, and I said it actually on social media, but there’s a lot of jews that are coming out now, and we saw this actually, this is a repeat of what we’ve already seen a few times over the past year since shit kicked off between Israel and Hamas last October, where the jews are coming out and calling for deportations. And then that’s just immediately turning on all the conservatives, like:

 

“Yes, yes! Deportations! Oh, my God, let’s get these browns out!”

 

Because, it’s like they’re getting a licence to express their inner racism. But the jews have been saying this for a year, and the jews have a lot of political power in this country. If they really wanted a deportation plan to be seriously implemented, they’re like think tanks and NGO’s and so on would push them very heavily in a systematic way. But we haven’t seen any of that.

 

I feel like a lot of the leading jews, like, I’m sure like a lot of jews just like Zionist sympathizers want these people deported. I don’t doubt that.

 

But I think a lot of the leading jews realise that having these pro-Hamas, pro-Hezbollah, pro-Palestine browns protesting on the streets is actually a great look for them and helps get the sympathy of conservatives on their side because they can play into White racism and they can say:

 

“Hey, look at these fucking browns! They shouldn’t be in our country. They don’t share our values!”

 

And then immediately, I can feel it. You’re like:

 

“Yeah, let’s get these browns out!”

 

And I agree with deporting them, of course, because they’re brown. But I also want the jews deported. I mean, when they say that their terrorist sympathizers. Well, when has Hezbollah committed a terrorist attack against Australia or any terrorist attack against the British Empire, against us? I don’t think that’s ever happened. Someone can quote, if I’m wrong, let me know.

 

But I don’t think that’s ever happened. Israel has committed terrorist attacks against us [yeah 9/11 for example – Kat]. In fact, that’s how the state of Israel came into fucking existence in the first place, through terrorist attacks. And that is land that was won, by the way, by Australian blood. We went in World War One and we fought the Ottoman Empire, and Churchill fucked us over and sent us into the beaches of Gallipoli. And how many men did we lose in that complete fuck up by Churchill in World War One?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think about 8,000.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we fought basically for that land. That was like our land as the British Empire.

 

And then the jews committed terrorism against us and stole it!

 

[24:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: King David Hotel.* They killed like a dozen or more.

 

[* The British administrative headquarters for Mandatory Palestine, housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, were bombed in a terrorist attack on 22 July 1946, by the militant Right-wing Zionist underground organisation Irgun during the Jewish insurgency. Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed, including Arabs, Britons and Jews, and 46 were injured. Wikipedia]

 

 

[See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

Joel Davis: In multiple acts.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah, there was a lot. Well, I think the first. Was it Perez? Was he the first president or prime minister? I think Perez or one of the first. They’ve all got strange jewy names, but one of the first prime ministers or the first prime minister was actually the head of one of the terrorist wings.

 

So it’s the same situation as, like, Nelson Mandela being the head of the ANC terror wing.

 

Joel Davis: There’s some idiot in the chat here. He said:

 

“You didn’t fight for Israeli land, you muppets.”

 

Yeah, in World War One we fought the Ottoman Empire and the Ottoman Empire controlled what is, like Palestine. And then Palestine became under the control of the British Empire.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Syria, I think, became part of Syria, and Lebanon, I think, became part of France. Like, the French controlled that part and the British got Palestine.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s just the history of it.

 

Thomas Sewell: There was a transfer agreement. The British Zionists made a deal to transfer all the European jews, or not all of them, but the vast majority of European jews in 1933 into British Palestine. Which Hitler even supported.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Havara agreement. I mean, that made sense. Like, it was a way to get the jews out of Germany. You know, I would gladly deport all of our jews to Israel tomorrow if we could.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, like, anyway, the point is that supporting Israel is actually supporting an entity that came into being through terrorism, against us. So is it rich when the jews are trying to morally grandstand about terrorism? It’s like:

 

“Okay, so you care about terrorism when it’s against you, even though you committed it against us historically!”

 

And also the only reason that these fucking browns are even here in the fucking first place is because you conspired to destroy the White Australia Policy! Like, jews, like, jewish groups infiltrated the Australian government and systematically attacked the White Australia Policy from the fifties to the seventies and were instrumental in its deconstruction because they felt that they basically were the odd man out in Australia.

 

We didn’t even want them here! There was barely any jews here before World War Two, they then snuck in against our will, largely through, you know, larping as Greeks and Italians. And there were a bunch of American based, like, jewish organisations that funded and facilitated jewish migration to Australia. The jewish diaspora sets up shop here. Immediately, all the communist jews, like, infiltrate our government and start sending all of our state secrets to the Soviet Union.

 

So then we had to create ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] because we had a high trust Anglo society before that. We didn’t even need ASIO. And then leading jewish community groups were like:

 

“Well, we should try and turn this into a multicultural country, open up the borders, end the White Australia Policy, because everyone else in this country are White Christians and we’re jews! And so if we don’t, like, crowd them out with some other minorities, you know what’s going to stop them turning around and looking at us as the odd man out and wanting us out on at some particular point in the future?”

 

And they explicitly said this, more or less like, I’m paraphrasing. So it’s pretty rich when getting lectured by the jews on all this shit!

 

But anyway, like, I digress. I think when you get these calls from a lot of these jewish leaders, it’s a little bit of a bait and switch. They kind of throw the carrot out of kosher racism. And it’s a way to get conservatives to emotionally side with Israel and the only democracy in the Middle East and kind of view jews as White. Like, I saw this clip of Barry Weiss. I think she was doing a podcast with Douglas Murray or something that Keith Woods posted it, like, a couple hours ago on Twitter. Maybe it was only an hour ago, actually, because I just saw it before we went live. And she was sitting down and they were talking about, she’s an American Zionist, by the way, a high, high ranking Zionist jew in the United States. And she was talking about how, like:

 

“Oh, the Qataris have infiltrated America. They’ve infiltrated our sports teams, our education system, our media, and they’re subverting American society!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“You did that! Like, worst. Like, you literally took over the whole fucking country!”

 

But so, like, jews are now just going to pretend like they’re White because it’s suiting them to make Whites identify with Israel.

 

But then when it comes to White issues that directly face us or we talk about, well, rather than deporting people from our country because they upset jews, what about because they upset Whites? Well, then jews freak out!:

 

“That’s literally Hitler! You’re going to commit a “Holocaust”. How dare you? As a jew, White people can’t be allowed to think like that.”

 

So then they magically are not White. So they’re like Schrodinger’s White Guy*, they just flip-flop based upon how it suits them. They’re just subversive scum.

 

[* In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger’s cat is a thought experiment concerning quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment viewed this way is described as a paradox. Wikipedia.]

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

[29:34]

 

Joel Davis: You know, just today, like, Australia’s richest jew, Triguboff came out and we need more immigration, apparently. Apparently like the ridiculously high record historical immigration into Australia that’s caused a housing crisis, and he’s jacking up the crime rate and ruining Australian society. It’s not enough immigrants for him. He wants even more! And who’s going to win? Because we’ve got 74% of the country in a recent poll saying they oppose immigration, we’ve got one richest jew in Australia that supports it. Which way do you think the government’s going to go? Because apparently we live in a democracy. I think the government’s probably going to go with the rich jew!

 

So what does that say?

 

 

[See: https://www.noticer.news/harry-triguboff-demands-immigration-increase/]

Thomas Sewell: He’s been doing that forever, though. He’s made all his billions of mass immigration.

 

So they’re not exactly unbiased sources of public discourse, are they? They’re profiting from it. I mean, you obviously know that, but it’s important for the public to be aware that everyone that advocates for it is either a traitor or they’re profiting from it, or both.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, he’s like Australia’s wealthiest property developer, so of course he wants mass immigration, not just is it crowding out the White demographic but, it’s kind of inflating the housing market. So when he creates these big high rise apartments everywhere, there’s all these jeets to pack into them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, he was complaining last year about how many of them were empty and how he needed to raise immigration. So they just build them. They build them and no one’s even in them yet. They’re not even 50% sold, but they just keep building.

 

And then they build the next one, and they haven’t even sold off the first one yet and they just keep building. And he went and lobbied the government and I don’t remember the exact conversation and obviously I wasn’t there and it wasn’t documented. But the article that I read that discussed the conversation that he had with the government when he spoke to them was:

 

“Who’s going to buy these apartments? I built them all and now they’re just sitting empty. Who’s going to buy these apartments, you need to raise the immigration level.”

 

So it’s absolutely disgusting!

 

Joel Davis: He’s one of the biggest campaign contributors to the Liberal Party and the Labor Party, by the way. And yeah, he’s been advocating for big Australia immigration policy for decades in a very prominent way with the property lobby and other lobby groups, pro-immigration lobby groups. So, yeah, that’s how it works.

 

But this is a bit of a digression, but I think it’s an important digression because when we’re talking about the Israel issue, like Blair said last week, it was kind of provocative. I think Blair said words to the effect of:

 

“I don’t care if Israel go in and genocide a million Palestinians tomorrow, and I don’t give a shit if Hamas invades Israel and gas a million jews tomorrow, it’s not my fucking problem!”

 

And I agree with that sentiment. It isn’t our fucking problem! But it’s made our problem because of the fact that they’re here in our fucking country!

 

So now we have to deal with it on the basis of what’s in, and also that the jews are trying to drag us into it as well and fight their wars for them. So that’s what makes it our problem.

 

And so I think there’s a pro-White perspective here. It’s like, I don’t really give a shit about. I don’t want to have to give a shit about it, but I’m forced to because of their presence here, their parasitism, their subversion of my society. And that’s where I differentiate from., … There’s certain elements in the movement that have this view:

 

“That we should really focus upon the plight of the poor Palestinians and waving Iranian flags and supporting the struggle of browns against Israel because they will pull on the heartstrings of Whites. They like an underdog, and they’ll come around and support the enemies of Israel, and it will help them to see the problem with zionism and with jews.”

 

And I just fundamentally disagree with that approach. I think that’s already basically the mainstream position of the Left. And all of them see Israel as a kind of evil, kind of they almost see it as White and as, like a Western settler colonial project, much like Australia. And they hate it for the same reasons that they hate Australia or they hate America, insofar as it’s, like, a White dominated country.

 

So I don’t believe in that kind of universalistic, like, moralism. I think we should just simply assert the fact that as Whites, we want our money, our blood and treasure to be entirely focused upon defending our own fucking people and our own interests and to hell with everybody else! And that’s basically how everyone in the world thinks, except, you know, Whites that have been psyopped into this deranged humanitarianism.

 

And I think the average Australian, like, you can look at opinion polls, do you support Israel? Do you support Palestine? I think the average Australian really doesn’t give a fuck either way. I think only a very small fraction of society really cares either way. And that’s actually natural and healthy because it’s on the other side of the fucking world, and these people have nothing to do with us! Why would they care? Like, if something was happening to a European country, like, if something was happening to Britain or to Germany or to the United States, then, yeah, of course we would care because they’re like racial kin. Who the fuck cares about, … I laugh at the jews getting blown up by Iranian bombs, but I don’t really care about what’s going on there personally.

 

I think the messaging has to be, how does it affect Australians? How does it affect Whites in general? You said before the stream that you didn’t see because Keith Woods debated. I can’t, but this guy’s name. His name was Daniel. It’s like some Muslim guy who lives in America, Daniel, some fucking, like, gibberish, right? He’s got some gibberish, fucking, you know, brown, like, Arabic name or something. I don’t know exactly where he’s from. But they were debating White nationalism, and the debate was interesting because Keith Woods was going for this kind of wholesome chungus White nationalism, where he was like:

 

“Hey, look I think we should have White countries for people of European descent, because those are our native lands, and I don’t want our countries to be involved in Middle Eastern politics or imposing ourselves over the Muslim world either. So we’re happy to leave you alone if you leave us alone. So what’s wrong with that?”

 

And what Daniel the Muslim, responded to that with, which I thought was really interesting, was he said:

 

“But if we let Whites have their own countries, what’s going to stop you creating all this super advanced technology, AI, robotics and so on, and then imposing., …”

 

And he literally said:

 

“Whites have higher IQs and they’re better at creating technologies. And what’s going to stop you from creating this satanic technological mega empire that then completely fucks us up. Whereas if we stuff ourselves into your countries now, we can stop you from developing basically, and prevent this kind of like, Faustian runaway where the Whiteman re-ascends to global domination status.”

 

[36:55]

 

And I’ve never heard a brown person ever make that argument before, but it was actually really interesting that he did.

 

And it’s like, I can actually see his point. That actually is a rational position for a brown person to take. I’m sure that’s actually implicit in how a lot of non-Whites think about this. Where the reason why they are so indifferent to our plight, it’s not just because they’re just selfish and only care about their own group. I think it’s because they’re afraid of us. They’re afraid, like right now, the Whiteman is weak and they can smell blood. And it’s like:

 

“We got to take these motherfuckers out now while they’re having their retard moment. Because if they wake up to themselves and go full Hitler mode, we’re fucked! Like, they’re just going to Giga Chad their way over the world again and we’re going to be their bitch!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And they’re not wrong. And Keith Woods can come along and give, like, his wholesome chungus:

 

“No, no, no! We’re nice guys. White people are nice. We just want to have our homelands back. And we respect you if you respect us.”

 

And I can see why the browns aren’t buying it because it actually does kind of smell like bullshit! And the reality is, for every Keith Woods, there’s a Joel Davis or Thomas Sowell or whatever, that if we look, yeah, we are coming for all your shit! If we get back in power, like, of course we are, because someone’s got to run the world. And if we don’t do it, the Chinese are going to do it, or some other group is going to do it. And so the only guarantee against someone else taking over the fucking world is taking it over yourself!

 

So there’s a zero sum kind of reality.

 

And actually Nick Fuentes, like, kind of criticised Keith on this point on his show, and I agreed with his take because he was saying, like:

 

“So what are we going to do? Like, we’re going to take back all of the White countries, and then there’s all of these vital resources, natural resources in Africa, and we kind of need them to advance our civilisation. And we’re going to go to the African tribesmen and be like: ‘Hey, can we have some of your minerals?”

 

 

And then, you know, chief, like I don’t know, some gibberish African name is like:

 

“No, you can’t have it!”

 

And they’ve got like a bunch of sticks and rocks and we’ve got like nuclear weapons and like all this advanced tech, and we’re just going to be like:

 

“Okay, you’re right to self-determination. You can keep all the vital minerals, like lithium ion and all this shit that you’ve got that we kind of need, and we’ll just like, stagnate our civilisation and just not come take it.”

 

And it’s like, that’s obviously pretty unrealistic. That’s just not how any civilisation has operated ever in world history. And the argument, I want to get your take on this because the argument from Keith Woods, I haven’t spoken to him about this directly this week, but I’ve spoken to him about this a lot over the years because we’re old friends. And his argument is that, well, the thing is he’d be like:

 

“Okay, I can see what you’re saying. But the thing is that if we put ourselves about in that kind of realistic supremacist way, we’re going to freak out all the other White people. And then White people aren’t going to want to do White nationalism because they’re going to get freaked out by this, like unoptical supremacism that makes it seem like Whites organising politically really is what the jewish media caricatures it as. It really is this genocidal, immoral, you know, evil, maniacal force in the world. And maybe the jews are right. Maybe the White race does need to be, … Maybe Daniel is right. Maybe the Muslims have to come and replace us to make sure that we don’t create some kind of dystopian, like, techno futurism that enslaves the world or something.”

 

But my retort to that is that I don’t think that Whites who are too morally cucked to embrace supremacy will have what it takes to take our countries back. I think the only Whites that will be capable of having the grit to rise up, take back control, do what needs to be done to assert ourselves back over our countries, which is going to require a hard struggle. And we’re going to have to basically ruin the lives of all the non-Whites that live in our countries to send them back. And some of them might want to fight us, as. Well, that’s going to require a kind of stomach for doing that. Kind of the assertion that:

 

“No, we are going to put our people first, and we don’t really care if that ruins your life. We don’t really care if people have to get hurt. We’re gonna do it!”

 

And I think really only, like, for someone to have that attitude, they have to kind of leave the humanitarian, you know, chungus, equitable. Like, let’s sit down in a room in suits and work this out like civilised individuals. Like, I don’t think that’s realistic. I don’t think we’re going to sit down and negotiate our way out of this. I’m going to have to fight our way out of this, and we’re going to have to impose ourselves in a very forceful way.

 

And the people that impose themselves are ultimately going to be supremacists. And Whites aren’t, like, innately incapable of having a supremacist worldview because we literally used to! We literally did White supremacy already and ran the whole fucking world! We had colonial empires that spanned the entire globe. We almost conquered the whole fucking thing! Like, 100 years ago. We literally ran everything in the entire world except Japan and China, and that was about it. We ran everything else.

 

So, yeah, like, it’s not like Whites are inherently cucked and unable to embrace this worldview. But I think we have to overcome the source, that spiritual source of that cuckoldry to win! And all else is folly!

 

But how do you see it?

 

[42:22]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Keith is playing that optical game, and maybe he does genuinely believe that. And that is certainly a much stronger position than the people that are currently in power or that currently are ruling over White people.

 

So that’s fine and noble. But, just because you remove your claws doesn’t make you a good person. Ultimately, White people need to have their claws back. And I kind of had a strange discourse today, just responding to another Telegram page, a big Telegram page that was talking about how cruelty was a bad thing or an evil thing, that was just completely off the mark, which we don’t need to go into. But you did mention cruelty in your little segment, and you mentioned re-migration, and you mentioned taking resources.

 

And so in this thought experiment, we’ve got this idea of we’re going to need resources. Let’s say we end our finite supply and Africa is there for the taking, and it’s more or less gone back to the Stone Age. What process do we initiate in order to get the resources? Well, the way I understand White people to be is that we’re very polite. White people innately are very polite. And we would probably try to get what we want through peace before just going straight to war. I don’t think White people are innately barbaric, that are just like, yep, let’s just smash everyone and everything in our way. We generally look for a path of least resistance. The jews often do the same thing, but then when they don’t get what they want, they usually look towards subversion.

 

And so when you have kind of Anglo and jewish influences within a federal government like the United States or Great Britain, you have all these kind of different foreign policies in order to obtain the resources that you want.

 

So the English, obviously, with some heavy influence from the East India Company and some jews in the banking sector established gun boat diplomacy, for example, and gunboat diplomacy expanded massively through the American empire post World War Two. And it goes under many different names.

 

There’s many books written about it. But more or less, it’s like how to conquer nations through debt slavery, through embargoes, through pressuring them and these stages of escalation until they fucking, you know, funding coups to take out, you know, Saddam or take out Gaddafi or whoever it is or Bashar Al-Assad. So we can see that that is an innate kind of hybrid policy versus the kind of Faustian or Aryan spirit with German National Socialism where Hitler’s like:

 

“All right, Germany needs living space. We’re going to push the Slavs, like, further into Eastern Europe or further past the Volga into the Caucasus, and Germany is going to expand down these river systems where all these German colonies exist already in Eastern Europe. And we’re just going to bridge these gaps so that we’ve got more land and we’re just going to fucking do it!”

 

So obviously, there’s this kind of just outward force, and then there’s kind of more calculated, maybe a little bit more Machiavellian, maybe a bit more subversive forces in order to get what we want.

 

But ultimately, when we, as you said, when we unshackle ourselves from this spiritual virus, which centres around White guilt and this guilty consciousness for what’s happened in the past, when that’s gone, when that’s no longer, you know, containing our will, we’re going to see White colonialism on a whole new level.

 

Now regarding re-migration, because that’s actually more important than taking resources in Africa because, yeah, like, whenever I get asked questions like that:

 

“Are we going to do this? Are we going to do that?”

 

Yeah, sure. Like let’s clean up the house first. And when the house is clean, we can focus on the street.

 

[46:32]

 

So it’s like, let’s deal with the immediate issue, which is obviously jewish control of our nation, and the traitors, the traitors that are in control of our nation. When we deal with that, I think the vast majority of non-Whites are going to leave Australia. Once White people rise up and we take back our government and we kick out and deal with all the traitors and all the jews, and either go to Israel or whatever. That’s a good point in itself because people always FED post with that. But I had my, like the 10th or 11th bank account shut down recently.

 

And I remember the first time I had my bank account shut down. My politics was very, very, I wasn’t very fanatical. I don’t know how to express it. I had the same essence of what I have now, but it was nowhere near as strong, it was nowhere near as radical. It wasn’t fanatical. I wasn’t obsessed the way I am now. I wasn’t a seeking justice, I wasn’t personally hurt, I wasn’t personally aggrieved. I wasn’t motivated by a sense of deep, deep pressure! There wasn’t a deep pressure to change the problem. It was more just like a holistic:

 

“There’s a wrong, it needs to be corrected. This is a better way of running the country.”

 

It was more rational, less emotional.

 

And then they shut down my first bank account. This goes back to 2015. And I thought to myself:

 

“Whoa, that’s an escalation. I don’t like the symbology of that. Where is this going? Is this how this government behaves? This is how this corporate state behaves? They’re willing to go to that length? They’re willing to eventually take food off my table, so I starve to death, or I can’t provide an income for myself or my future family. Okay, that’s an escalation!”

 

And my politics started radically changing after that point! Because I was personally aggrieved.

 

So what that where I’m going with that, at a tactical, strategic level. Sorry, not tactical, strategic level, is everyone’s going to get exactly what they deserve. So if this is resolved nicely and quickly in the next, say, like, decade, I’m sure there will be these, like very astute, you know, Keith Woods approved policies of how we’re going to do re-migration and how it’s going to be packaged and the optics of it. And it starts with these:

 

“Can you please leave? And here’s the plane ticket.”

 

And then it kind of escalates. It continues escalating.

 

And so what’s happening is the longer this goes on for, the more damage done to White people in the process, the worse, the more cruel, the more horrible, the more violent, aggressive, dominating, exhaustive is the energy and the violence that White people are going to be capable of! It’s not even that I want that or don’t want that, it’s beyond that! It’s like that’s what we’re going to be capable of as a collective the longer this goes on for.

 

So you have re-migration, but we’re not even calling for re-migration. We don’t even use that term. We do a little bit, but the term that we put on our banner was “deportation”. And that’s a whole different kind of conversation. When you talk about re-migration, it’s kind of packaged nicely and softly. We talk about deportation. It’s at bayonet point! It’s a completely different kind of, it’s a more aggressive approach because I think fundamentally our belief is that re-migration is not enough.

 

What re-migration entails is a polite conversation, and asking people to leave and maybe getting rid of some troublemakers, versus deportations implies actually changing the structure of the society completely! Totally! Absolutely! And the team, like Keith Wood’s team, I’m sure he’ll progress, and I’m sure as time goes on, they will sense the further aggrievement of society as a whole, and they will sense the further escalation. Because this ultimately goes back to Israel-Palestine or Israel Lebanon or Israel Iran. It’s the same sort of concept. It’s a type of warfare that is escalating, that’s constantly escalating. So where it is at the moment, re-migration, Keith Woods, friendly optics. Where it is right now at this exact point in time, is probably the most popular thing as we’re seeing with European elections at the moment. Is that going to be the case in ten years time? I don’t think so. and that’s why our optics are built different.

 

So that’s what I think about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, I know Keith pretty well, and I don’t doubt that he is well intentioned. I never question his intentions. I think he’s trying to do what he thinks is the best thing for, not just for the Irish, but for the White race in general. I think he is sincere.

 

But, yeah, for me, because I used to have a little bit more of that strategy in my approach. That was partly due to also trying to make my nationalism and my Catholicism fit together. It was partly because of that as well, or I think largely because of that.

 

But when I look at things objectively in some of these European countries, I can see maybe a cleaner way of preserving their demographics. But when I look at the core countries, which are really where the power is distributed, like the United States, Britain, France, Germany, or here, I don’t think it’s going to be so simple. And those are really the key countries, the key geographical locales that need to be secured.

 

Whereas I think in Hungary and in Austria, they can probably vote their way to maintaining a 95% White country, plus. Hungary basically has that already. The Austrians, very positive signs. I mean, I want to talk a bit about the Austrian election, but I guess this will bridge into it a little bit. But I want to discuss that as a separate topic.

 

[53:05]

 

But, yeah, but for me, I’m kind of looking, like, three steps ahead, and I’m like, okay, I’m already there. And I’m trying to prepare people for the fact that that’s where we’re going. That’s kind of like the inevitable destination. And the sooner that people accept that and prepare accordingly. And by preparing, I don’t mean, I’m not FED posting, I’m not saying:

 

“Stockpile your guns. Race wars are coming!”

 

I’m not saying that. Don’t misconstrue me.

 

What I’m saying is preparing yourself, like, mentally and spiritually for the attitude and the mentality that is going to be necessary at that point.

 

So anyway, yeah, my view on this is that uh, things are going to accelerate into a more, … And what I mean by that as well, White people are at the moment, yes, the majority of White people are afraid of going full where we are, with our position, obviously. But the resistance is weakening. You know, in the last two years, I posted about this today. The discourse even within our movement has become so much more radical and also, generally speaking. Just think about it. Like, across European politics, conservatism is dead. There is not even one country where the conservative Party is getting more votes than the populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party. Except England. Like, except Britain, just. Where, the conservatives are only slightly ahead of the Reform Party. And by the next election, I think Reform could overtake them because the Tories are either going to put some jew in charge who’s going to shill for Israel egregiously, and he might do somewhat better, or the other main candidate seems to be this black woman.

 

So the conservatives, I really hope they put the black woman in charge of the conservatives, [chuckling] because that would be hilarious! They’ll completely die. So conservatism as a political aesthetic is dead in Europe. In the United States we criticise Trump, and the criticisms are valid.

 

But if you look at it objectively, Trump’s campaign this time around is more radical than the last two times. Like, he wasn’t promising mass deportations the first two times. That’s now his signature policy. And that’s actually an intensification. But our movement has progressed so quickly and so radically that we’re further away from Trump. Like, Trump moved, like, 10% or 20% towards us, but then we moved, like, 80% away. So then we’re just like:

 

“What the fuck is this?”

 

Whereas in 2016, there was all of this kind of energy from the Alt-Right, the dissident Right, whatever, for Trump, and people are acting like, as if Trump cucked and he used to be based, but now, it’s literally the same shit! It’s actually a slightly more radical version of what it already was. And that’s something interesting to behold.

 

There’s been this radicalisation, and then even in Australia the response to our organisation you know, people wouldn’t touch. Even, like, twelve months ago, people wouldn’t touch us with a twelve foot pole now. You know, attitudes are softening massively, massively!

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And what I kind of prophesy is that as the situation gets worse, as White people are not just demographically crowded out by all this immigration, like, I just saw, I have to confirm this and look into it, but I saw some posts on Twitter about the New Zealand census, which New Zealand is only 55% White now! Which, like, their census from last year, which is insane! Because I thought it was 80% White. I haven’t been to New Zealand in five years, so it’s a small population, and a lot of the Whites in New Zealand move here.

 

So I don’t know. I have to look into that. I’ll talk about it more on the show next week when I’ve had a chance to check those figures for myself. But I mean, that’s insane! If that’s true, that’s fucking insane! That is such a quick transition. America is almost majority, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Canada’s had the fastest transition. I saw some statistics today that said, I think it said five out of the top six cities. I’d have to find it again. But I think from memory what it said, five of the six cities with the highest percentage of foreign born people were in Canada.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. And the rates of immigration here have been obviously crazy in recent years. Australia is lucky in the sense that we do get a decent amount of White immigration. We get people coming here from Britain and Ireland and stuff, and that helps preserve our demographic to a certain extent.

 

And I actually posted about this again recently that if you look at the voting patterns, like, I really find it annoying when you get these Australian parochialists wherexx they are like:

 

“Oh, like, fuck the Poms!”

 

Like, they have an issue with White immigrants. It’s like White immigrants are a blessing. If you look at the data, European immigrants are way more Right-wing than native born Australians. They’re majority Right-wing voters. They’re more opposed to immigration as well, I’ve seen in certain polls than native born Australians. There’s plenty of people in our organisation, by the way, that weren’t born here and we’re in the situation as a race.

 

So I think that is kind of like really short sighted and narrow minded to take that view. The problem isn’t immigration necessarily. The problem is non-White immigration. Like, White immigration is fine. This country was built off White immigration.

 

[58:42]

 

But, the point though is that the demographics are getting ridiculously destroyed in a super quick way now. Like, the rates are boosting and at the same time the anti-White persecution is boosting. It gets to the point now Muslims are organising to have their own independent power bloc and so on. The racial lines are getting a lot more explicit.

 

There’s a point at which you have such a high degree of racial conflict at the core of your political system that these kind of highfalutin ethical ideals like “justice and rights” and all of this kind of stuff that is like the bedrock of liberal democracy, where these things start to really subside in kind of relevance. And all that people start to care about is just the existential reality of:

 

“My team winning, my team losing, my team being subjugated, my team fighting back against oppression!”

 

Or whatever. And people just start seeing politics in these kind of tribalistic friend-enemy, distinction, us versus them turns, and they start to see the world in a dog-eat-dog way.

 

Like, if you look at the data on Trump supporters, the Trump supporters that live in cities, I saw a poll about this years ago, they have more of, like a dog-eat-dog understanding of the world, and they’re more concerned about immigration. Where the Trump supporters that live in the really White areas, they’re like generic Christian, Evangelical Christian Republicans who are just voting for the Republican Party because that’s what they do. But they aren’t anywhere near as concerned with immigration. And they’re a lot more soft on racial issues, because they live in a White neighbourhood in a nice part of America. So they don’t actually have to deal with the same issues that the city dwelling Whites have to deal with. Where there’s black ghettos around them and beaners are pouring in and they’re getting crowded out in the place where they grew up. There’s lots of places in major cities where they’re just not the same place that they were 10, 20 years ago when you were younger. They’ve been completely transformed.

 

So that is going to incept over time, more of this kind of existential framing on politics, and it’s going to soften people up to hearing what we have to say, which is a very simple message, which is that:

 

“Forget all the noise. Either we come together and fight back and defend the ourselves and our interests against all of these people that are targeting us and that are against us and want to destroy us, or they’ll destroy us!”

 

And all of your ideals about fucking freedom and justice and humanitarianism, like, you can shove that up your ass! Because that is really, like, almost irrelevant at this point. Because none of those principles are being given to us by anyone else. None of these other groups that are, they’re all hypocrites! None of them extend any of these rights or concerns to us. So why the fuck should we care about them? We should reassert ourselves, take back control. And when we have power and control and stability, then we can worry about them again.

 

And that message might seem radical right now, but it’s becoming less and less radical by the day. And people are more and more for it because, and I think in a lot of ways as well, that’s actually the only way to make politics interesting to a lot of Australians. I think a lot of Australians, they’re apolitical because it’s not necessarily because they have no interest potentially, in politics whatsoever! And they’re just totally just apolitical zombies. It’s because politics hasn’t been interesting. If politics is a battle between conservatism and socialism, they don’t really give a fuck!

 

But if politics becomes race war, that’s infinitely more interesting. And if politics goes from being like this kind of gay argument about ideology and it becomes something concrete, which is:

 

“Are we going to have control of this country? Or are we going to just give it away and become subjugated in our own country and just be, like, cucked by this whole process?”

 

That actually is a fight! Like, it’s not about:

 

“Who are you voting for and how much taxes should we pay. It’s like, this is a fucking knife fight for who controls the country!”

 

So I actually have a lot of faith in our politics to become very popular and very engaging to a large group of people in the coming decade. That’s the main difference that I have with, I don’t want to use the word “optics cuck”, because that’s not necessarily accurate. I think, in a lot of cases. But with the very ethically constrained humanitarian version of White nationalism, where I think that that approach, the idea that Whites will only embrace a pro-White position within that purview, and they won’t embrace a kind of more like, realistic dog-eat-dog world existential White nationalism, which is just like:

 

“It’s us or them! Which side are you fucking on?”

 

I just don’t buy that. I don’t think that’s actually true.

 

But I guess I don’t know where Tom went. I guess he’ll be back soon. I wanted to get his take, but I was just kind of finished that point.

 

But while he’s gone, I guess we can talk about the Austrian election. The Austrian election was quite interesting. The Freedom Party of Austria, which is, I think it’s one of the most radical parties in Europe that actually gets votes and is like, a mainstream power player. So their policies are like:

 

“We’re not going to take any asylum seeker, even applications, we’re not even going to take refugee applications. Full stop. Fortress Austria!”

 

They call it “Fortress Austria! Fortress Europe! No immigration!” Like, literally no immigration from outside Europe into Europe is their position. And re-migration plans to start repatriating non-Whites back to wherever they came from.

 

So it’s a very radical set of policies by the standards of European politics.

 

[1:04:42]

 

 

As I said, there’s not really many other parties in Europe that have any kind of support behind them, that have policies that radical. And they just got the most votes of any party. They got like 30% of the vote in the Austrian election and they could make a deal with the conservatives to create a coalition and rule. So right now, the Chancellor of Austria is the leader of the conservatives, who got, like, I think, 25% of the votes.

 

So they’ve got enough seats between them to run the government. And they’re now, I think, going to negotiate, you know, potentially some kind of coalition government. Those negotiations could fail. I watched a few Martin Sellner* interviews, who is the most, like, well known identitarian nationalist activist in Austria. Did a few streams with him back in the day, actually, very intelligent guy, an incredible activist, very successful.

 

[* Martin Michael Sellner (born 8 January 1989) is an Austrian far-Right political activist, and leader of the Identitarian Movement of Austria, which he cofounded in 2012. He is considered to be a key figure in the Neue Rechte in the German-speaking countries. He is also deemed to be part of the alt-right movement. In March 2018, he was denied entry to, and deported from, the United Kingdom. A year later, he was denied entry to the United States because of the Christchurch shooter event. In March 2024, the city of Potsdam tried to ban Sellner from entering Germany for 3 years, because of his speech on “remigration” at the 2023 Potsdam far-Right meeting, that ban was revoked by a German court in late May 2024. Sellner talks about the Great Replacement. In March 2024, Sellner was arrested by Swiss police while he was giving a speech at an event of the Swiss Identitarian organisation. Wikipedia]

 

And I think he’s the individual that is most responsible for the normalisation of the term “re-migration” in the world. So you have to give him a lot of credit for that.

 

And he was saying that obviously, he has a lot of connections and a lot of understanding of Austrian politics. He was saying that he is doubtful that the conservatives will ultimately be willing to form a coalition with the Freedom Party, that they will allow Kickl, who’s the leader of the Freedom Party, to become the Chancellor, and that those negotiations might be unsuccessful and the conservatives might go to the socialists and some of the other Left-wing parties and try and create a coalition there instead. And they’ll have to rule with a slim majority.

 

And maybe this is actually good, because if the conservatives can’t make a deal with the nationalists and instead go and make a deal with the socialists to rule, even though the nationalists are the most popular party in the country, that will look very bad for them. The government that they negotiate out will be obviously even more cucked than the conservative government has been because they’ll have to make all these concessions to the Left. Meanwhile, the Freedom Party will be able to kind of fight both of them as, like one thing as a pure opposition movement.

 

And if you look at the voter demographics, the majority of the conservative votes are coming from Boomers, whereas, like, younger voters, like even like Gen-X, Millennials and Zoomers are way more voting for the Freedom Party than any other party in Austria. So demographics are on, age demography is on their side. They are the ascendant party, like the ones that have been making gains for the last few years.

 

So if they don’t get a coalition sorted I could see them doing even better at the next election and then being at that point too big that they’ll be able to kind of form the government. They’ll be too big to fail at that point, and the conservatives will be so decimated that they can subjugate them basically to their coalition at the next election.

 

So it’ll be interesting to see what happens, like, whether they actually get into government now or not. But what it shows is that a hardcore anti-immigration platform and a pro-re-migration platform can win politically in central Europe.

 

And obviously parties like that, like the AfD in Germany and other parties with similar policies, are doing incredibly well all over Europe.

 

And so it is kind of white pilling to see that European voters, particularly young European voters, basically awakening to their interests and backing the further Right parties. And, yeah, there’s, like so much momentum behind the idea of not just shutting down immigration into Europe from non-Whites, but actually fucking sending them back and kind of just securing Europe for the White race.

 

So I think that’s quite positive. I’m quite white pilled about it. Not that I think that these guys are going to get in and fix everything in the next year or something, but that the trajectory is very good. It’s very good.

 

How do you see it?

 

Thomas Sewell: The quote that comes to mind is Adolf Hitler. He says:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And that applies perfectly to this exact scenario. There’s a lot of Hitler quotes that are taken out of context or used for things that aren’t necessarily relevant. But that quote is relative to the NSDAP struggle, their historical struggle, and they obviously entered in a lot of coalitions. They had a lot of election success in 31 and 32, but not enough success to completely take power. And even right at the end, they had to, well, just before the second last thing, I guess, that they did was they entered into a coalition with the monarchists. That was the last faction left. But there was many, many circumstances where they were doing very well. And in order to have some sort of share of power, they had to make these concessions. And Hitler refused to make the concessions. He said:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And so it’s very good to see this kind of progress. And the politics is just so rapidly changing across Europe. I mean, Martin Sellner and all these freedom parties across Europe, from the Netherlands to Austria to AfD to the Swedish version, all these parties were just microscopic ten years ago, they were just micro parties, kind of like here in Australia, how we’ve just got all these useless micro parties. And they just had a vision of where they wanted to be. Where they wanted to go. They didn’t really keep too many secrets as to where they were going. They played the very optical game, which if you want to have a sort of five or ten year period success, you do that you don’t do what we’re doing, that’s for sure. And they’ve achieved a lot of these parties are either the second or third or now, in the case of the Freedom Party in Austria, they’re the biggest party in the country.

 

[1:10:48]

 

This rolls downhill and this should be very white pilling for everyone, even if this isn’t the be all and end all for Europe or central Europe, obviously, it’s going to be a much more serious party, or a more serious version of the Freedom Party that’s going to be equipped with The Right Stuff to really make the big differences. And that brings me to the point that I discussed before when we brought up Keith Woods. The subject of re-migration is really important because the second half of the statement re-migration is not when, it’s not why, it’s how! And it’s with, what army?

 

So that’s the second half of the question with what army? And why we are doing what we’re doing and why we’re doing it differently to, say AfD or Freedom party or the party in the Netherlands or SD or whatever it’s called in Sweden.

 

The reason why we’re doing what we’re doing is because you can’t use the current state apparatus to achieve the goals that you actually need to in its current form. Where Australia needs to go, where America needs to go, where Britain needs to go, where all of Europe needs to go, where all of us together need to go. We need a state apparatus that can enforce the political party.

 

So we don’t actually have that. What we have is a liberal democratic system where, let’s say, hypothetically, we take power in ten years or 15 or five. The number doesn’t really matter, the timeframe doesn’t matter for the scenario.

 

But then you start these re-migrations, so you turbocharge., … We have Customs here in Australia. We have, like, Customs. We have border security. We have a similar version to what they have in America called ICE*. We have these things here in Australia, and these things are everywhere in America and in Europe. Now, are they very large? Are they large enough? No! Could we turbocharge these things? Could we put more funding into them because now we’ve got power, now we control Parliament, we can put a couple hundred million dollars into these parts of the state apparatus. But this is not something that can be fixed with money, because just like how the government is telling American soldiers that they can’t go help their families, they’ve got to be on standby to go to the Middle East and its bordering on a mutiny.

 

[* U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a federal law enforcement agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. ICE’s stated mission is to protect the United States from cross-border crime and undocumented immigration that threaten national security and public safety. Wikipedia]

 

Likewise, if the State Department is full of people that are fundamentally traitors or they’re not actually supporters of the Freedom Party, or they’re not supporters of the re-migration effort, you’re only ever going to get these kind of piss poor attempts at really attacking the nerve centre of migration. You’re going to have criminals sent back. You’re going to have all the loose hanging fruit is going to be sent back. Anyone that’s kind of just easy to grab is going to be sent back. But there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in Austria, there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in England or Australia and tens of millions of non-Whites in the United States, even with a million or two being deported.

 

So then you’re back at square one. Okay, well, so what do we need to do then? So then either you force the state apparatus through further legislation, you force them to go even further and you’re going to face a mutiny. You’re going to face an ineffective government. And the people in the Freedom Party, the people in the Republican Party, whoever’s going to be in charge of deportations in this first round of deportations, they’re not stupid. Sorry, not in charge of but the people that are going to be soliciting it, they’re not stupid. They know when they’re going to be on the brink of mutiny. They know when the state apparatus is going to say no. They know when the general public are going to strike and protest. And they’re going to have, they’re going to want to do it in a way that escalates the situation but doesn’t escalate enough that you’re going to see mass hysteria in the public. You’re going to see the media kick off, you’re going to see some Lefties complaint and some protests in the city. But you’re not going to see like what happened with the Freedom Convoy and the Freedom Rallies [re Covid] where a quarter of a million people are in the street and the CBD is just at a standstill for days. You’re not going to see that with a small amount of deportations.

 

But with mass deportations, you are going to see that. The state apparatus isn’t able to actually do what it needs to do to clean the country up, to fix the problem. So then we’re back at square one.

 

So it’s not money that you throw at the department or the apparatus. It’s now a change in manpower. It’s a complete change in manpower. Now, the entryists or the reformers, the Fuentes types, they want to trickle people in to the state apparatus. They want to say:

 

“Hey, you know, do you want to join the military? You should join the military! Hey, you want to join border control, you should join border control. You want to be a lawyer, you should become a lawyer. You want to do these things? Do it, and then be our guy on the inside. And then when we take political power, we’ll be able to promote you internally up in the ranks, and you’ll know your guys, and they’ll be on our team.”

 

That’s an interesting theory, and it might work for some small scale stuff, but the kind of scale that we’re talking about that’s necessary to secure the existence of our people in the future for White children needs a complete reshuffle of the state apparatus.

 

[1:16:45]

 

And so what we’re doing is not just building a political movement, or a political party. Sorry, we are building a political movement, but we’re not just building a political party. We’re actually building a state apparatus. We’re building a replacement state apparatus. So that when we take political power and the state apparatus doesn’t do what it’s told, we can just replace them. So re-migration with what army? That’s why people need to consider their physical involvement, not just their political support, not just a donation, or a vote at a ballot box. You need to actually consider yourselves part of a machine, part of a mechanism that can actually not just take state power, but actually enforce state power.

 

So the last point I’ll make on the subject is the historical example of Adolf Hitler. Hitler went through this interesting process where he didn’t need to take totalitarian control as much as people say that he did. He didn’t actually need to.

 

For example, one of the biggest issues he had with the SA* was demobilising them. The SA didn’t want to demobilise. He had two and a half million men. They didn’t want to demobilise. He integrated some of them into the Wehrmacht. And obviously the SS eventually became the Waffen SS, so it became an armed part of the political wing, and it became way bigger as Waffen SS than it ever was as just the SS. But Hitler didn’t need to actually take control of all the state apparatuses. He could just replace some key people and just the machine just started operating as it needed to, because, again, Hitler was in part a reformer. He had a revolutionary ideology, but when he actually took power, the country only had a small percentage of traitors in it, and it was still 99% German.

 

[* The Sturmabteilung (German SA; lit. ’Storm Division’ or ‘Storm Troopers’) was the original paramilitary wing of the NS Party. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. The SA were colloquially called Brownshirts (Braunhemden) because of the colour of their uniform’s shirts, similar to Benito Mussolini’s blackshirts. The official uniform of the SA was a brown shirt with a brown tie. The colour came about because a large shipment of Lettow-shirts, originally intended for the German colonial troops in Germany’s former East Africa colony, was purchased in 1921 by Gerhard Roßbach for use by his Freikorps paramilitary unit. Wikipedia]

 

So we’re dealing with a different situation, where Hitler had the insurance policy. If the Wehrmacht went on strike, or if the Wehrmacht said:

 

“No, actually, we don’t support this regime change, or we don’t support the Reichstag degree, or we don’t., …”

 

You know, if they try to do a coup, they weren’t able to, because he had the SA and he wouldn’t have demobilised the SA, he would have militarized the SA and he would have removed the Wehrmacht from the opinion. So, I’ll say it again and then I’ll finish:

 

“Re-migration with what army?”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think the Austrians are very well organised, like, across the board in their nationalist movement, from what I’ve seen. And there is a lot of behind the scenes organisation there as well. And their activism, street activism, is first class. They’re very impressive. I think we should really study the Austrians and look to them as a model for how to develop the nationalist movement in other European and White countries in general, because they’re one of the leading countries for this.

 

So I think we have to give them a lot of credit. And I do really respect a lot of the guys that have really put in over there over the years. And in many ways, I think the Freedom Party was in, of Austria, was the first, like, modern, like, contemporary style, like, populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party that really existed in Western politics.

 

So there have been innovators, and it’s, I guess, unsurprising that the Austrians are the innovators of the new paradigm. Austrians have a penchant for this kind of thing. And they’re in a unique position because Austria is not in NATO, so they have a little bit more independence.

 

But they’re in the EU.

 

And that’s the thing when also, that’s another aspect of this whole thing about controlling their borders is that, … And they’re aware of this as well, obviously, they really want to create coalitions within the EU to push for EU wide policies, because the EU is, the borders are open within Europe. So if Austria and Hungary and some of these countries are like:

 

“Fuck immigrants!”

 

But the Germans and the French and everything are like bringing immigrants in and they’re dominating the EU, then there’s only so much they can do, because they’re part of the EU. Like, yeah, they can deny asylum applications, they can send some people back, but they can’t have full control over their borders. There has to be a European wide solution.

 

But the fact is that these kinds of parties are rising everywhere and they’re different levels of quality. Like, I think the Austrian populists are far more radical and far better ideologically than the French or the Italian. Like, you know, Meloni’s clique or whatever. There’s Lega, like the League of the North in Salvini’s party in Italy, that’s a little bit better. But I don’t know, Italian politics is a little bit complex. They aren’t as popular, and they still aren’t as radical as the Freedom Party, I think. So but the Germanosphere that seems to be leading the way, like anti-immigration politics are being very successful also in Scandinavia. Like, it’s growing in Sweden, it’s growing in Denmark, obviously in Germany, the AfD is doing fantastically well. So that kind of like central European corridor.

 

I mean, even in the Netherlands, their populist Right party is kind of fucked up! The People’s Party or whatever it is that Geert Wilders runs. Wilders is like mixed race and I think part jewish. And he redirected all that energy into like shilling for Israel and hasn’t really done very much since he got elected to resolve things there.

 

But I think the Freedom Party will do a lot better, if they get in.

 

[1:22:19]

 

Thomas Sewell: They built off a primarily anti-Islam movement. So they were kind of like a Civnatty pro-zionist. It’s kind of like Tommy Robinson, the political party with like a quarter Indonesian Dutch dude.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I think people have this tendency, I saw people saying like:

 

“Oh, who cares about the Freedom Party? Look at what happened with Meloni in Italy.”

 

And it’s like, no! Like, if you understand the history of this party, it was actually like the Freedom Party, by the way, was created by like an SS officer. But it’s not really about that history, that goes back to the fifties. But from the nineties onwards, it’s been kinda kind of a leading party in Europe for the anti-immigration cause. And the Austrian kind of nationalist movement, identitarian movement, is very advanced and has really like, pushed the Overton Window in Austrian politics. And they look to Hungary as a model. And you could say about Viktor Orban in Hungary that he is surrounded by jews. I think he has a jewish wife, and that’s true.

 

But also, like, as far as European leaders go, he’s like the best on immigration and preserving the demographics of his country. That’s just an obvious truth. Obviously Austria, Hungary have historical links, but they’re kind of looking to that as a model.

 

And what’s interesting about that is that what you were talking about before that in Hungary, you have an example of the Right-wing seizing control of the state, not just winning an election, but like actually capturing control of state institutions and, basically kicking out, like reforming the education system and reforming the media and kicking out a lot of elements out of Hungarian society. And Orban calls it a “illiberal democracy” as he doesn’t subscribe to this liberal idea that we’re just going to allow all these NGO’s and like communist and like American backed, jewish backed necessarily. There’s probably some, like Zionist things, institutions that operate in Hungary. But the Left-wing institutions have been really defeated at the institutional level.

 

And now if I was Hungarian, I would vote for Mi Hazánk. I’m sorry if I pronounced that wrong, who seemed to be like a more pure, like, nationalist party that doesn’t have all these jewish links, from what I can see. But just looking at it objectively like, the Hungarian political system is in a much better place than almost any other Western country. And it’s because of embracing a kind of illiberal kind of philosophy. And Martin Sellner has written books about institutional capture and this kind of thing that are very popular in the Freedom Party circles and in the AfD circles in Germany as well, even in Swiss politics. And the leader of the Freedom Party refused many times to disavow Martin Sellner. And they brought up that Sellner did some activism when he was a kid, defacing a synagogue and accusing him of being a neo-Nazi. And Kickl refused to cuck.

 

And so that indicates that the identitarians over there hold a lot of sway, and they aren’t as radical as us, but they’re pretty solid on a lot of the key issues.

 

But it’s something that we need to keep an eye on and watch with keen interests and particularly if they can seize power to see how it goes. And how successful they are, what challenges they run into, because, yeah, there’s nothing like that in Australia. [chuckling] Like, at this stage, we want to build it. We want to build something.

 

But when you look around at the Australian populist Right, I mean, there’s nothing doing. I mean, One Nation is a joke. It’s almost, it’s a toss up whether it’s a joke because Pauline Hanson is an egomaniac, or it’s a joke because that homosexual that basically runs the party, who’s her, you know, top staffer James Ashby is like a Liberal Party operative, like, purposefully sabotaging the party. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s a totally dysfunctional party. Like, what we’re seeing in Europe would be replicated here if One Nation opened itself up to membership. Like, I’ve talked about this before, like, if you become a member of One Nation, you don’t get any voting rights, there’s no branches.

 

So the activist, you know, cadre of the nationalist movement in Australia, there’s no party for them to go into. They can’t go into One Nation and fill it up with fresh, young blood and have all the talent accumulate there and have a kind of dynamic campaign. If they did have something like that, heaps of our guys would be in there. The party would probably be 50% more radical than it is, and they’d probably be getting 15% to 20% of the vote and really challenging the Liberals from the Right. But it’s totally incompetently run.

 

And all the other options, like, what else have you got? Like, you’ve got the United Australia party, Clive Palmer’s outfit, and he basically folds the party and then reconstitutes it just before the election, every election cycle. There’s no continuity, there’s no branches. Again, it’s just all, Clive Palmer just throws money around because he’s a billionaire, in a very arbitrary way. There’s no ideological structure to it and its policies are kind of vapid. And, yeah, there isn’t a lot of other options.

 

Like, it’s interesting, the Libertarian Party seems interesting because I’ve heard noises internally that they’re going to embrace a officially an immigration policy that is totally restrictionist, that is to the right of Pauline Hanson, and One Nation. If they do that would be very interesting because I think there’s a recognition with a lot of the libertarians that libertarianism itself isn’t that popular. You kind of have to mix it with nationalism to get anyone to actually vote for it or care about it.

 

So that’s interesting to see how that develops. But there isn’t really much cooking on the Australian Right.

 

[1:28:24]

 

Meanwhile, our population, like, we have a naturally I think, racially minded and Right-wing population in sentiment, but it’s just totally depoliticised and there’s nothing really engaging within the political system. Like, I was watching a little bit of the vice presidential debate in America the other day and there was all these Americans posting about it on Twitter. And I was thinking to myself:

 

“I’ve never watched a political debate between two Australian politicians before in my life!”

 

I’ve never even had a conversation with someone about, oh, in the debate between, like, I’m sure they have debates. Like, they must have had a debate between Albanese and Morrison for the last election. I didn’t fucking even know it was on TV or care. I don’t think anyone really did. Most of the time, I don’t even remember that the election is on and my mum called, calls me and is like:

 

“Make sure you vote!”

 

Like, I don’t even remember. And I’m like a political guy.

 

And that’s how boring Australian politics is and how disengaging it is so whereas, like, Americans are like:

 

“Oh, my God!”

 

Like, it’s not even the presidential debate. It’s like JD Vance versus, I can’t remember the other guy’s name. vv Tim Walz or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s totally uninteresting. But like this, it’s like this big thing and there’s like tens of millions tuning in and like, it’s a big deal. It’s like:

 

“Got to watch the game, got to watch the debate!”

 

Kind of thing.

 

So, yeah, we don’t have a society like that. And I think that’s part of, part of the problem, maybe part of the solution ultimately could be if it’s like judo flipped against the establishment. What’s the term you always use, Tom? You say they’re all, … You need to use the term “skin suits”. You use the terminal “skeleton crews”, all the major parties.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. It is a skeleton crew. Our capture of Australian politics and the state apparatus is going to be extremely slow and painful and nothing is going to happen. And then it’s going to be really quick. It’s going to be really quick and everything’s going to happen. Because they’re just so stretched thin. And there’s no genuine interest. Like the political parties themselves. The Greens are actually going to be the hardest party to defeat because they have the most, … And obviously, when the Muslims finally mobilise, they will be quite difficult. But the Liberal Party and Labor Party, … It’s interesting that our goals align actually quite nicely with just the way things are going to be moving. The Liberal Party is actually the easiest party to destroy out of the big three. Even though it’s usually the most powerful, it’s actually the easiest to destroy. It’s just held in place by some private school boys and jewish money. That’s really all that’s holding it in place, so.

 

But do you want to get onto the Superchats? We’ve covered all the topics for tonight, or most of them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we can. You said you wanted me to pull up that Noticer article. I got it here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we can go through a little bit of current affairs.

 

Joel Davis: So this is the woman charged with the Hezbollah flag. She looks like a ganger from Bankstown kind of thing. Sarah Mouhanna. So some Lebo [Lebanese] chick.

 

Anyway, that not a particularly interesting story, frankly, if I’m totally honest.

 

 

Thomas Sewell: But I didn’t want you to necessarily pull it up to discuss it. I just wanted, if you could pull it up. Yeah, it was a funny article.

 

Joel Davis: This is interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was kind of funny that the poster girl was pretty good optics as far as Lebs [Lebanese] are concerned. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] Yeah, that’s funny. Yeah, it’s kind of weird!

 

Thomas Sewell: They were joking in the chat, like:

 

“Oh, you know, Jacob’s going through the illegal symbols. This girl’s going through the illegal symbols. Maybe they could do a stream together.”

 

Joel Davis: I don’t need any more Syrian Girl, One Struggle nonsense, I don’t think.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] thought it was funny!

 

Joel Davis: I saw Syrian Girl got upset at me because I said, all Muslims should be deported. Or I said something like:

 

“All these sand people problems wouldn’t be our problem if we had the White Australia Policy. Like these sand people, ethnic disputes, and they should all be deported.”

 

And then she was like:

 

“Oh, but like, Zionists are terrorists, too. And the jews!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, like, jews are sand people as well, to me, as well. You’re all sand people. You should all be deported!”

 

And she was happy with that. She’s like:

 

“Well, at least you’re consistent.”

 

Whatever that means.

 

But it’s like:

 

“Just get the out of my country. You’re brown!”

 

That’s kind of my attitude towards these ethnic women. I’m not interested in one struggling with from the Arab world they’re like nine or ten out of tens [in beauty] is really, like, mid at best. So it’s not even worth it.

 

[1:33:46]

 

 

 

But yeah, this abomination is in Martin Place in Sydney in the middle of the city. And this is disgusting! Because it’s like, literally 50 meters from the Lindt Café where there was an Islamic, … It was like a terrorist attack. It was like a siege. And like, two White Australian women, I believe, died in that siege. He executed one and another one died because of stray bullets in some kind of shootout exchange with the police. And now we’ve got this black Islamic cube nonsense! I mean, it’s fucking disgusting!

 

Yeah, I mean, it speaks for itself.

 

And that’s the thing, like, I talked about this and there were people getting upset at me online that, like:

 

“Oh, you’re just playing into what the jews want you to say. The jews want you to hate Muslims!”

 

It’s like, wait a second, wait a second. I don’t have to fucking accept this crap in the middle of the first city the biggest city of my country, 50 meters from where a Muslim committed a terrorist attack. I don’t have to accept this crap being built in the middle of my city. This is disgusting! Why the fuck is this alien religion having its monuments built in the middle of my city? It’s fucking absurd!

 

Like, it’s possible to fucking hate jews and Muslims at the fucking same time and want them both out at the same time. Like, I don’t have to go easy on the Muslims and just let them get away with mobilising within my society and raping White women and putting themselves about with this kind of total disrespectful bravado and just be like:

 

“Oh, yes, but, like we’re on the same side against Israel!”

 

That’s fucking cucked! Like, fuck them!

 

So, yeah, but what do you think about this monument? Do you have thoughts?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I agree with David Hiscox with his article. It is just another humiliation ritual. I saw some libtard saying:

 

“Oh there’s no need to get so offended by its only temporary.”

 

It’s like, I don’t give a fuck whether it’s temporary or not. It has no place in our society. I’m offended by it. And gone are the days where the conservative talking point, was:

 

“Oh, you know, facts don’t care about feelings, or if you’re offended by it, good.”

 

It’s like, no, what offends White people, what is egregious towards White people and White culture and our customs should be illegal, straight up. We should have the laws that the Left are trying to put in place where we can’t hurt the feelings of brown people. It should be the other way around. If you’re a foreigner and you’ve come to our country, you’re a Muslim or you’re some other, you’re not of European descent and you’ve come here, I mean, if you’re a tourist, you play the game, you play by the rules you visit the sites and you go home to your country. That, like, that’s what, I don’t know if that’s a healthy society that has tourists, but that’s what a liberal, like a White nationalist liberal democracy would have. It would have foreign tourists in it. And these people are just overstaying they’re welcome. They’re rubbing it in. They’re just looking for a fight to put those kind of displays up. And the traitors exacerbate it as. Well, I mean, as I said, once we’ve dealt with the traitors and we will deal with the traitors, once we’ve dealt with them, the Muslims and all these other ethnic groups are going to come to the table and they’re going to say:

 

“Okay, you guys are obviously pretty serious. So what are we going to do about this?”

 

You know, there’s, it’s going to be pretty straightforward. What’s going to happen? I don’t think there’s going to be, … Well, again, it depends on the timeline. It depends on the timeline.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’d be pretty easy to just put them on boats and fuck them off. The real issue is the White traitors that are holding us back and preventing us from asserting ourselves with their cuckoldry. I always say this, and it’s so important to reiterate, we can talk about the jews and other non-Whites, but ultimately what it comes down to is that we aren’t resisting this with almost any of our strength.

 

In fact, more of our race, like, our race, is doing more to contribute to our own destruction than it’s contributing to resisting it. So that’s the issue. If we got enough White people together, organised to resist it, we would easily defeat it and restore ourselves. It’s totally within our capability. We don’t need anyone but ourselves to fix this, but we need to find ourselves to fix it.

 

And right now, you know, bar, a few of us, people are like, lost, depoliticised, cucked, you know, cowardly asleep, whatever, you know whatever the case may be. And they need to be engaged, and then we can fix the problem. But that’s literally all it comes down to. It’s like it’s within the hearts and minds of the White race that this is either solved or not solved and nowhere else.

 

And that’s why I don’t believe in really giving a shit about the sensibilities of Muslims or soliciting any kind of association with them whatsoever!

 

[1:39:02]

 

And also this view that, like:

 

“Oh, we should go easy on the Muslims because hating Israel is really in right now, and we don’t want to present ourselves in a way that is going to alienate people.”

 

It’s like hating Muslims is in right now as well. Muslims didn’t become popular anytime recently. There were polls done around ten years ago on Australians attitudes to Islamic immigration. And the majority of Australians said in that poll that they want Islamic immigration completely stopped to Australia. They want a total ban on Islamic immigration. That included, like, it broke it down by party affiliation. That included like, 33% of Greens voters and 40% of Labour voters. So, like, a very substantial, like, more than a third of Left-wing voters are against Islamic immigration. That’s an old poll, but, it’s not a popular position to be pro-muslim. People don’t like them. And particularly in Europe they’re the most hated group, really, because they’re the largest and they’ve committed the most amount of crimes and then the most objectionable to deal with in public. And they’ve raped and murdered countless of our people. So, yeah that doesn’t actually make any sense. It’s actually harder to explain to the average White person the problem with jews because, yeah, White people are against Israel on the Left, but they’re not against jews. Like, they’re against “zionism”, quote unquote, which is completely different in their minds. It’s not different in reality, but it’s different in their minds.

 

So, yeah, obviously we have to educate the people about the jewish problem. But we’re going to alienate people that have patriotic sentiment, that are already kind of somewhat like spiritually aligned to our message if we don’t talk about the racial issues that they have to deal with in a more direct way that they already somewhat understand. Like, the average patriotic White Aussie already doesn’t like Muslims coming into our country. They already have an issue with the Indians.

 

And so the idea that we should sacrifice talking about that and just purely fixate upon the jews is like this autistic Internet ideology that doesn’t actually bear any resemblance to real life. And some people justify it by saying:

 

“Oh, but Goebbels said that we should just focus everything on the jew.”

 

And it’s like, yeah, it’s because in 1920s, 1930s Germany, there were no fucking Muslims! There were no pajeets! There were no chinks. Right? So why would they focus on them? They weren’t even fucking there. Like, it’s not that complicated.

 

But, yeah, anyway, we can get into the Superchats. Adolf Caesar said:

 

“Good evening, gentlemen. What are your thoughts on using Australian culture and folklore and using terms like, quote, ‘mateship’? Would that be effective rhetoric for Australian NS?”

 

What would you say to that, Tom? You’re muted.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think we’re incorporating it very well, already. You can see a lot of the speeches that I’ve done personally in the past and the things that we’ve focused on. I mean, our biggest rallies have been Australia Day in Victoria there have been things like Eureka Stockade. So we are trying to revitalise Australian folklore. We are focusing on what some would call the “Nativist angle”.

 

Jacob has even extensively worked for the last three years to revitalise the original Australian sort of folklore anthems, like the White Australia song, which was probably the second most popular song in Australia 100 years ago after the national anthem. And, yeah, I think we’re already doing a good job. Could we do more of it? Yeah, sure, we could do more of everything. I think what we have to focus on the most at the moment is, well, from a purely cultural perspective, hmm, I don’t think that’s our main focus culturally at the moment. I think our main focus socioculturally is making everyday, average Australians, working Australians, making them more politically motivated, making them politically charged. And so appealing to that kind of what is now more of a niche, well, I don’t think the purpose of us doing it is to appeal to that niche. We’re not doing it to appeal to people that have that as a personal subculture, this niche folklore, Nativist type attitude. We’re actually doing it as an act of preservation and Cultural Revolution or cultural rebirth.

 

So we’re actually doing it as a back end cultural process. Our front end is to try to capture as much attention to our important talking points, like mass deportations or living space for White people or destroy pedo freaks or whatever is. That’s our front end.

 

And then in the background, certainly, to do a cultural shift within our membership and within the people that are engaged within our politics. That’s my answer.

 

Joel Davis: Like, for me, it’s got to be organic. Like, we’re already naturally Australian, so we express our own cultural attitudes in an organic way. That’s good.

 

But then this kind of contrived, like, parochial, like, kind of harkening back to some bygone era of the stereotype of what Australiana was about. Like, that can come across as quite cringe if you’re kind of overdoing it, I think. And also it’s kind of alienating. So it has to be authentic.

 

Like, obviously we expressed our Australian character and attitude, but we don’t want to act like Boomers or whatever just to kind of recapture some old Australiana. Like, we’ve got to relate to young White people in the current era and how we conduct ourselves.

 

And I think we do that pretty successfully.

 

But, yeah, somewhat like the legacy of White Australia, though. Like, what you were talking about with Jacob, you know, trying to preserve, like, old songs and, like the phrase “Australia for the Whiteman”, that’s a classic political slogan that predates Australian Federation. Like, we believe in honouring the traditional White Australian nationalism because we’re the successors to that. Like, we inherit that tradition. And that’s spiritually very important that we connect ourselves to that because we’re trying to continue on that project of our ancestors, of our forefathers.

 

So in that sense, yeah. But this idea that we’ve got to be super parochial and use the word “mateship” all the time. I mean politicians do that. Like, you hear Anthony Albanese and shit like that talk about “mateship”, and it sounds cringe. Like, I don’t want to become some, like, cringe cliche Lord. I would rather just talk like a normal White Aussie into 2024 talks, so that people realise that I’m just like them on a certain level rather than, like, as I said some kind of contrived you know, set of cliches. I got another Superchat here from, one second, from Apollonian JL. He said:

 

“Have you read the Myth of the 20th Century by Alfred Rosenberg? And do you really think that non-northwest Europeans can assimilate into Anglo Saxon Australia?”

 

I have read the Myth of the 20th Century. I’m actually thinking of doing a podcast, or a series of podcasts on that book down the line.

 

[1:46:59]

 

So if you want to get the Joel Davis take on that text, we’re not doing it now in the Superchat, it’s too big.

 

But obviously, in that text, Rosenberg goes over, you know what he sees as the kind of unique character of the Germanic European, but he also talks about the Aryan Greeks and the similarities and differences between, like, northwest Europeans and the ancient Greeks. It’s quite an interesting discussion, and I think a lot of his assessments are accurate. And obviously, Australians are Celto-Germanic peoples. That’s what the Constitution of the nation is if you look at the data, like, on the racial demographics of White Australians, we’re, over 90% plus Celto-Germanic. There’s a little bit of Slavic and Mediterranean DNA here, but it’s a small minority.

 

So that’s the character of the nation. That’s the founding stock, and that gives our national character, and that’s what the majority of us are. And a lot of the people who have some ancestors from southern or Eastern Europe are mixed, like, with northwest European.

 

So the amount of people that are pure southern European or pure Eastern European are actually quite small, and we’re not really getting much immigration from those parts of the world now. Like, the Whites that immigrate to Australia are mostly northwest European. They’re mostly coming from Britain or Ireland, or sometimes from Germany or Scandinavia or America. They’re not really coming from those places.

 

So I would anticipate that through the generations, they’ll just become more and more fused with the founding stock population, and there won’t be very, very many pure Italians or pure Ukrainians or anything like that left in Australia.

 

So I think we should just focus on that Celto-Germanic kind of cultural foundation for understanding ourselves, and that’s what we are. And if you’re someone that has mixed ancestry or ancestry from southern or Eastern Europe, then if you want to be an Australian, you kind of have to assimilate into that. I think we can be inclusive to the ones that genuinely want to assimilate and over time, they’ll just kind of mix in with the rest of us down the generations.

 

So people might say that, like from a Puritan standpoint, that’s a big problem. I always say, though, like, if you’re a Croatian who lives in Australia and you really care more about being Croatian than you care about being Australian, I don’t personally understand why you wouldn’t move to Croatia, as an example, back to Croatia. That’s true for any group. Like, if you’re a German and you live here and you care more about Germany than Australia, why are you here? Like, I don’t really understand. Like, for me, like, I’m an Anglo Saxon, so then it’s easy for me to be like, well, Australia, because I’m of the founding stock, so I can identify with the country.

 

So I don’t really know what that’s like to feel like a kind of ethnic minority. But if I felt like Australia, I didn’t really identify with Australia as much as I identified with Britain, I would literally move to Britain and just start a life there and focus on, like, returning to the land of my ancestors, if that’s how I felt.

 

So I don’t really understand why you would like these groups that they want, like, almost Australia to become multicultural and to be:

 

“Super accepting, of Australia is not primarily an Anglo or Celto-Germanic people, it’s just European. And whether you’re Macedonian or Bulgarian or Anglo, it doesn’t matter.”

 

It does actually matter. And our national culture is a specific way for a specific reason. And if you truly love Australia, you would respect that.

 

But, yeah, the people from those places that want to embrace that, I am accepting of I’m not like, so I might get caught a cuck by the Nordicist, like, hyper Nordicist people. But I think that it doesn’t really make any sense, the position that we’re in right now, to be alienating those people if they’re going to fight for our race and for White Australia alongside us, they are pretty similar to us. Like, they are of the same race as us, even if they’re of a different subgroup of the race. It doesn’t existentially threaten who we are to be inclusive to them. Like, it just simply doesn’t.

 

Whereas being inclusive to non-Whites does. Like, that literally completely undermines the racial character.

 

So that’s how I see it. But if they get offended by that idea that shows that they’ve got a hostility. If you’re someone of Italian descent and you’re getting offended that I’m saying Australia was founded by Anglo Saxons and that it’s a Celto-Germanic nation, then I’m sorry, you need to fucking go! You’re part of the problem! Because you literally don’t respect Australia, you don’t fucking respect our national history. And the literal, like, racial stock that founded the fucking country! Like, so you’re basically an anti-Australian. You know, you have the mentality of these other non-White immigrants, basically. You’re trying to undermine Australia’s identity to fit you. And you’re getting angry at a founding stock Australian for having my own identity and asserting it. So you have to join our team. We don’t have to join your team. That’s the way I see it. Tom probably doesn’t want to go into that. We’ve answered that question too many times. RSA Liberty, …

 

[1:52:44]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the fifth time we’ve had that question.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. RSA Liberty said:

 

“Fuhrer, is the first hundred man march going to be the next national meet? Issue the order!”

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] I hope that that’s someone that’s involved in the organisation asking that question. I won’t go into too many details, but we have been doing account of who we think we can put forward.

 

And obviously that’s not including the recruitment that we’re going to have between now and then. I think the next national is going to be very impressive. I’ll leave it at that. I’m not going to say a number because it’s still in the air, but., …

 

Joel Davis: It’s always difficult getting everyone in the country to go to one place like that. Always presents challenges.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, recruitment’s been good and it’s looking good!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m sure if it was a Zoom call, if it was a Zoom call, national meetup, we’d have a thousand people on the Zoom call. But because it’s not a Zoom call and there’s a lot of logistics involved, and cost as well. A lot of our members are young and it’s a big cost to travel to the other side of Australia or whatever, but we try to make it a holiday, we try to make it an adventure as well. So that way that they’re getting something out of it at a personal level, not just as a concept of duty.

 

So it’ll be impressive. I hope you’re involved and yeah, January is some time away. It’s over three months away. So if guys want to get involved between now and then you’re going to have to be involved for probably a couple weeks, or a couple months to be able to get the orders for where it is so get involved now. At this stage, it’s mostly under wraps. Will we go public? Maybe a couple weeks, or a month out? Maybe there’s a chance we’ve done that in the past, certainly with two of the national meets in Victoria. We went public with it. Obviously, Sydney and Brisbane weren’t. We didn’t go public with it until the last minute that we were there. And that’s just because if you look at the pressure, the police pressure we had.

 

So, anyway, I’ll leave it there. I won’t go any further. But you better be involved, [word unclear], if you’re going to make comments like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, come to nationals. Like, get involved now. You come to nationals, you’ll get to see Tom fight someone in the ring. I’ll fight someone. Blair said he wanted to get into a punch on at nationals in the ring. So you get to watch your favourite streamers punch on IRL. Racist UFC. It’s Keno.

 

Thomas Sewell: A whole weekend of racism!

 

Joel Davis: We’re gonna have a lot of fun, so, yeah, obviously we’ll be doing some activism. I’m not looking forward, to be honest, at the 10k run.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But got to do it. Got to smash it out!

 

Thomas Sewell: Get ready for the 10k run. I did a 4K run tonight and it wasn’t at a good speed, I’ll tell you that. But it actually, it felt fine. It was easy to do it. I just wasn’t very fast. So I’m hoping to drop ten kilos and get my speed back.

 

Joel Davis: I did it. I did a I just did a 2.4, like, locally tonight and, yeah, it wasn’t too bad. Yeah. But I’m nowhere near the fitness level that I’ll be at nationals. Because over the wintertime, we haven’t really been running. I’ve just been lifting weights and putting on, like, chungus. You know, I might look a little less bulked because I literally lost, like, eight kilos in the last month because I’ve just been trying to cut weight so I can get my run time up and we’re getting back into kickboxing and stuff. And, yeah, I was punching harder, but I was punching harder for 45 seconds, and then I was starting to breathe heavy. So what’s the point? [chuckling]

 

Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Buy yourselves a based, racist looking sandwich or an extra racist, wholesome chungus roast cooked by someone’s grandma.”

 

Well, I don’t think grandma is charging $10 to eat roast. You know, that’s why we love the grandmas, because the grandmas they got a, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe we can get a bottle of San Pellegrino or something for when we go visit grandma.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we got to take something. We got to take little chocolates or something for Grandma.

 

Thomas Sewell: Grandma wants chocolate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but, like, these days, with inflation, a $10 sandwich? Get the fuck! Get the hell out of here! You’re not buying anything. Like, what is this, 2018? Like, yeah, the jews have fucked us. Immigration has fucked us. You know, you can’t buy a sandwich for less than $20 now. It’s ridiculous! That’s not your fault, of course.

 

But as I said, I blame the jews. I blame ZOG. Fuck ZOG!

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe I should get a racist sandwich with that Max Caruso guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s obviously a reference to that Max Caruso interview that you did a few years ago.

 

[1:57:36]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I hope he puts up the full interview. Not the full interview, but, yeah, the snippet he put up was very small. Like, there was one point where he was saying, like, he was asking if he has to go back to Italy. This kind of ties in with that long winded question that we answer every stream. But he said:

 

“Do I have to go back to Italy?”

 

And I was like:

 

“What are you talking about?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Well, I’m not White. I’m Italian.”

 

I was like:

 

“What? What are you talking about?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Well, isn’t that how it is? Like, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, you’re doing the meme. Do you really feel that way? Do you feel like you’re not White? Do you feel like you’re much different to me?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know. I never really thought about, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, I didn’t realise you were Italian. I mean, obviously your last name’s Caruso, so I figured you were like, you had some sort of Mediterranean influence in you, but, yeah, like, it’s cool, bro. You can stay. Like, you’re White. You and any Italian that acts and behaves and looks like you can stay. You’re all right. You’re one of the boys.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, cool. Well, yeah, maybe I can get on board with this is all right!”

 

That’s pretty funny. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: That’s probably why he didn’t put it in the video, because he didn’t want to come across as too sympathetic.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he would have cut that.

 

Joel Davis: But I saw he uploaded, because he uploaded to YouTube, and it did reasonably well, but then he uploaded a section of it to TikTok, and that went crazy on TikTok! It got like last time I checked, like, 300k views or something so maybe it’s more now, I don’t know. I haven’t even checked back in. So Tik Tok is great for viral racist content. Hitler’s going viral on TikTok. TikTok had to shut down all the Hitler speeches because they kept going insane! And it became a meme where people would be like put the Hitler English AI translation, and they’d be, like, dubbing it with their face, but then putting them in the humourous situations where they’re upset at their girlfriend or waiting in line or they’re in these frustrating, you know, interpersonal situations, and they’re just channeling, like, Hitler’s rage! And that just became the new TikTok trend. 2024 is cool! [chuckling]

 

When we sat on the show a few months ago, the vibe has shifted. Some people doubted it, but there’s no doubting that the vibe has shifted. The vibe has definitely shifted.

 

Yeah. What else we got here in the someone Odysee. In Reality said:

 

“Finally catching a live stream. It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people!”

 

Well, thanks, In reality. Glad you enjoyed the stream. And GoyBoy1488 said:

 

“He’s taken a week off politics, but he wanted to pop in and support his favourite Aussies. How do we feel about small breaks? Does that go against the quote? ‘We will never slacken, never tire.’ See you next week.”

 

Thomas Sewell: You got to be tactical. You got to be tactical with your breaks. You got to have a reset. You got a rest between sets. Yeah.

 

Because if you don’t have small breaks, you’ll break. You’ll like the whole point of having these small breaks. Sorry, I’m being distracted. I can hear Luna calling my name, which is odd for her. I don’t know why she’s talking in her sleep. Well, she’s not asleep. She’s already woken up.

 

But, yeah, now you can’t, … The first couple of years I was involved with politics, I went really hard, and I learnt very quickly that you kind of, it affects your mental capacity, it affects your intelligence, it affects your stress levels. You have to learn to enjoy the struggle. And that’s one of the important principles of this, is that it’s a marathon, not a sprint, and you have to learn how to enjoy it. You have to learn how to take time off and deload and rest, and you come back better! You come back a lot better.

 

But most people don’t even do enough to take a break. Most people just need to change their lifestyle so that they can afford more energy towards nationalism, because 99% of people that consider themselves nationalists, don’t actually do anywhere near what they’re capable of doing. It’s not them that needs breaks. They need lifestyle changes so that more of their effort is dedicated towards nationalism, which starts with getting involved in real life.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m someone that doesn’t take a lot of breaks and just kind of keep, like, chipping away at things with, yeah, very seldom do I actually. And maybe that’s bad. Maybe I should recharge the battery sometime, because, I don’t know, that’s more my approach, kind of just keep plugging away.

 

But it’s a personality thing. Some people really need time on their own. And I know, for example, Blair is like that. Because Blair is someone who, he’s got a lot of energy output, so if he can kind of burn himself out very quickly. He’s got to manage his energy distribution. So it’s a personality thing.

 

[2:02:49]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I benefit a lot from being alone. Like, I’ve noticed that the greatest periods of political growth, like, sorry, not political growth, but personal growth. The greatest personal growth that I’ve been through has been when I’ve been alone, not just prison, but just in general.

 

So I think being alone, truly alone, like, without distraction, is extremely important for personal growth. And that would be considered a break because for me, one of the biggest parts, I don’t have a massive social battery.

 

So one of the biggest parts of nationalism that’s quite taxing for me is dealing with lots of humans. I wouldn’t say I’m extroverted or introverted. I’m probably in the middle somewhere, but you have to be pretty extroverted to be a political character, a political leader. And a lot of people., … Look, if there’s 200 people that want your time, you don’t have 200 people’s worth of time.

 

And a lot of people, they want your time. They know who you are, they admire you or they respect you or whatever, or they just want to have a conversation with you. But you don’t have 200 people’s time for them. You have you have one 200th of a person’s time for them. And that, not to be rude. When I first got sort of like popular or famous, however you want to put it, infamous. Like, when my Telegram went from like 200 followers to like 15,000 or something, I noticed that a lot in, whenever I was online, I would just get so many DM’s, and it got to the point where I had to take my Direct Messenger off my public Telegram.

 

That’s why it’s not on my public Telegram anymore. If, you know what it is, you know what it is, but I don’t advertise it anymore because I don’t want direct messages. You either want to get involved or you don’t. I just don’t have time. I mean, I was talking to Joel about Twitter recently, and he keeps telling me to get my Twitter back up. But again, like, having the Twitter DM’s open is like as soon as I opened the Twitter DM’s, just immediately it started flooding in. And it’s just paragraphs and paragraphs and paragraphs, and it’s all good faith. It’s all people wanting advice and people explaining how they’re inspired and this is what they want to do. And it’s awesome! It’s awesome stuff!

 

But, yeah, I just try to direct people towards like, a local representative or local leader because, yeah, otherwise I’ll burn out. I’ve done it before. I’ve done it in the past. I’ve responded to every single message. I mean, I’ve got about. Shit! I can show you my phone. I got like 999 unread personal messages on my phone. I just don’t open personal messages anymore unless they’re from, like, someone that I know or deal with in person or they’re a representative of a movement already. I just don’t have the energy for. I’ll burn out! I’ll burn out and I’ll have to go hide in my room for like, three days and not come out. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I think I have a little bit more social battery than you to an extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you do you do.

 

Joel Davis: But even still, I get overwhelmed as well by the same thing. People really, they expect your time. Like, they expect you to. Like, okay, they get offended. It’s like you don’t understand the amount, the sheer quantity of people that are trying to talk to me all the time. It just becomes overwhelming and then I just lose track of it. Like it just gets dropped. It just goes into vertical scroll. And it happens even to my own family or my own friends. Like, I’ll see they message me and be like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got to go back to that.”

 

And then just so much crap fills everything up that I just forget to check back in.

 

Thomas Sewell: I still get probably half a dozen random messages a day. But it’s a huge improvement in the quality of the messages, certainly, I think, because you can only get my direct message through someone that already knows it. So that helps. Unless they’re just lucky and they just search it.

 

Yeah, I’m gonna call it a night.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, we’re done. This is the last Superchat is just a statement. A Hitler quote from Keep Asking for Truth, saying:

 

“From my dead body, my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.”

 

And I guess we can end it there. Also saw Hitler’s Big Toe asking me if I was drinking breast milk. No, it was raw milk.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: You know, if I had this much breast milk, I’d give it a crack and see how it is. I’ll give you a review. I could do a review bro on breast milk, but I don’t have a pregnant wife at the moment. I wouldn’t want to be drinking some random bitches breast milk. That’s weird!

 

So anyway, we’ll end the show there.

 

Thomas Sewell: No comment on the breast milk question. No comment! Good night. Hail Hitler!

 

Joel Davis: See you guys later.

 

[2:07:49]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of Oct 8, 2024 = 151)

HyperChat min: 100

@BMC1488
4 days ago
Australia for the White Man! o//

8
1
jojoNora
2 days ago
I wish we could clone a Joel for each Western country.

3
1
Hide replies
MrWebster
1 day ago
same can be said for Tom and Blair!

1
0

@katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript:
[Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following:
Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments.
Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel.
Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.”
Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews.
Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.”
Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters.
They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts.
Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.”
Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints.
Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform.
Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe.
Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia.
Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia.
Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities.
Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia.
Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism.
More, …
Less

1
1
Mr
4 days ago
Q: After the zombie apocalypse occurs and Western Civilization collapses, where do Joel Davis followers think that White civilization will rise and re-establish itself as the globe’s premiere society….Europe, North America, or Australia?

2
0
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
Keith woods is a pseudo intellectual pussy, and even maybe a grifter.

6
4
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
are they talking about him? you have a time stamp by any chance?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee like watch the stream

1
3
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
umm gee thanks for nothing lol

0
1
Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee your welcome lol

The Crucible 01
4 days ago(edited)
Honestly cant remember where they mentioned him, 45 minutes in i think. lol

Wesselmania
4 days ago
full-on “grifter” is a stretch.. his weakness is fame-seeking

Heartland
3 days ago
Keith puts his head above the anti-white parapet. What do you do to defend the white race?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
3 days ago
oh of course because i dont make streams i dont do enough in defense of my race, piss off with that dribble, I could ask you the same question. On fact let me ask you this does Keith get money for what he does?

InReality
4 days ago
review “bra” get it?

1
1
MrWebster
15 hours ago(edited)
Tom and Joel think I am too extreme and insane on this. But basically I believe once Us White nationalist retake our own nations again and deport all the Non Whites out our Nations. We as Whites must then think in a Supramacist and World Conquering vision. Where we will have no choice but to create an Anti white Ethnic artificial disease that makes all whites on Earth immune to this disease. But once this disease is released on all corners of planet earth. Once invented and released against non whites, it will wipe out more than 70% of all Non whites on earth. After the first sucessful wipeout run, we as whites would need to siege all non white Nuclear and Weapons cache arsenal before they can use it against us. We will have to in next couple of years wipe out the last non whites vestiges on planet earth down to the last single Man, Woman and child towards total genetic Extinction. We will have to also eliminate all genitic tissue dna of non whites, preserving non white DNA will be a very treasonous crime resulting in executions. We all have to come to the final solution as white people that all non whites have to be driven towards extinction to ensure White Survival in 21st century. There is no alternative to this solution. They want us extinct, we should drive their extinction. Peaceful/tolerant coexistence is mere deception and illusion.
Less

1
0
Smokey
4 days ago
I feel this chat is a little boring now. Why no comments?

1
0
Weltenesche
8 hours ago
It shows you don’t know too much about Austrian politics. The Freedom Party is extremely philosemetic and their leadership makes regular trips to Israel. They’re also civnats and have put out ads about how “great” it is that Turks are voting for them and how Turks are welcome and accepted in the Freedom Party. Honestly the best advertisements for the Freedom Party came from the Greens and the Liberals, comparing Kickl to Hitler

Heartland
3 days ago
1:05:32
is that raw milk Thomas is drinking?! >>> !

Archipelago Woes
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
JoelTom

InReality
4 days ago
o/

Randall_Waffen
4 days ago
o/

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
wp

DOLO
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
ooops

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
It’s a public forum. Why don’t you try to add something of value to the conversation? Be the change you wish to see instead of whining.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
That’s ironic.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
are you serious? Weren’t you just comment policing just a min ago? Very feminine behavior.

DOLO
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
I’m excited to see!

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@smokey
Mostly replying but I’ll shurrup now o7 o/

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

InReality
4 days ago
“i feel like” lol

Smokey
4 days ago

@InReality
Okay, thanks.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
speak up then, bub!

Smokey
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning

@InReality
I feel like you’re dominating the chat. Why not lot other people post a comment?

InReality
4 days ago
We should call raw milk “white powerade”. Not sure if Aussies know what Powerade is but it’s an American sports drink.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Didn’t some “Turks” try to blow up a railway in Ballarat circa 1920?

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
cheers

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@InReality
IKR? I removed the comments btw.

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
can you imagine the media scrambling to decide what to say about that? “Do we support the muslims or the lgbtp???”

ThinRedLine
4 days ago
howdy

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i haven’t seen a non white in tent cities full of white Australians

InReality
4 days ago

@CampsLindburgh
kebabs

WaffleStake
4 days ago
pain

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
god?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
what’s in the box

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Lindt cafe siege

InReality
4 days ago
White World Policy

Smokey
4 days ago
Does Syrian Girl live in Australia still?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
All in one? I’ll have a look

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
Alex Linder did that one too

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Pete Quinones on Odysee did a reading of “Camp of the Saints”. It’s in his playlist.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Palmer is the archetypal example of the goy billionaire wasting his wealth on vanity project

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Camp of Saints, horrifying in some ways. but also it describes the fruits of the do-gooder mentality, overrun by the stinking muds, which is kind of satisfying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Many have Brazilian links, geneticaly. Ditto with Chinese ancestry. Look at world maps & it makes sense.

InReality
4 days ago
Austria: home of the original leader!

WaffleStake
4 days ago
in Tassie?

InReality
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
That’s how it starts, huh.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
now we have the inbred rapey ones

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
we had those more white seeming ones about 10 years ago

WaffleStake
4 days ago
on the other hand all the “kiwis” we have are islanders, not Anglo

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no need to go to India when India comes to you…

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
They’ll be Brahmans – the richer caste.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i agree that they shouldn’t be here simply because this isn’t their country

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Queensland is the suburbs. There are lots of them here to be sure, but they seem to be white presenting in their behaviour for the most part.

InReality
4 days ago
FORTRESS EUROPE NOW

DOLO
4 days ago
Rohem was the leader of the SA before the putsch

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
How can they be part Brazilian?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
needs a completely different moral foundation. with pro-14 words as 1st principle

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
Help this channel grow! Repost and like the Twitter if you can guys.
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1841790466012102935

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Maori aren’t merely Polynesian. They were part Brazilian & Chinese before they also miscegenated with Europeans.

InReality
4 days ago
Love the milk

BASEDVLAD
4 days ago
White Power Drink \o

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no, I’ve heard of it tho. sounds horrifying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
True Have you read Camp of the Saints?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Have you been to India/Pak/Bang?

InReality
4 days ago
The level of focused seriousness and decorum these Aussie’s have is really appealing to me.

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
English politics is the option of being fucked from the front or from behind

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Ah right. I’m not sure which state, but I’m not sure how you’ve avoided the smelly lower caste Indians who ruin every public space

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
all it takes is proper internet censorship & its game over

InReality
4 days ago
Low-caste Indians especially are rapey, scamming street shitters.

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Australia

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Until beef isn’t allowed on your BBQ?

InReality
4 days ago
One of the things that did it for me was all the indian scammer videos on youtube. And the travel vlogs. Check out Bald and Bankrupt’s latest video on India

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
which country are you in, Waffle?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
personally I haven’t had problems with Indians but my personal experience is irrelevant

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Yeah Indians are disgusting

InReality
4 days ago
I have to say, I have a particular distaste for Indians.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
there are more Asians in New Zealand than Maoris

DOLO
4 days ago
Yeah, it’ll be Indians at a guess

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
Hello London

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Indians

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Asian, islanders

DOLO
4 days ago

@InReality
Hobits

InReality
4 days ago
wtf??? NZ 55% white? Who is moving there, asians?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
The THEY are already tying themselves in their own knots.

DOLO
4 days ago
Trump also said that America needs more legal migrants.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
No need for a drivers licence if you can’t legally pay for one? Hmmmm.

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
Even Hitler had the Berghof. Everyone needs to recharge the vital energies.

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago

@InReality
o/

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
o/ have a nice break

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago
$14.88
taking a week off of politics, but wanted to pop in an support my favorite Ausies. How do you two feel about small breaks? Does that go against “we will never slacken, never tire…”? See you next week!

InReality
4 days ago
I assume that the Germans who thought that the NSDAP were too extreme and unoptical probably changed their minds once life got a lot better for them because of Hitler.

@TimeToWakeUp
4 days ago
Whatever “evils” Whites are capable of, non-whites would do in a worse fashion ten times over

Svxdrifter
4 days ago

@lewpers

@lewpers
4 days ago
The mudslimes are not going home until the jew issue is solved first, never forget that. As such, the latter is technically the more pressing issue.

InReality
4 days ago
Daniel’s statement is very telling.

InReality
4 days ago
$20.00
Finally catching a live stream! It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people!

Harry Holler
4 days ago
with zero sense of irony

Harry Holler
4 days ago
Joel, Barry Weiss accused the Qataris as “having dual loyalty”.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Then ASIO is turned against the White population

InReality
4 days ago
What’s up, based Aryan chads?

Whiterabbit
4 days ago
Frank Lowy was in the Irgun who shot British soldiers

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
plus russia runs their own missile protections in both iran and syria from what i understand

DanTheOracle
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
yea russia gave them their new fighter jets not long ago and they already have i think its s400 missile protection

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Macron lost ‘3rd place’ yet he still rules, you are not going to vote your way out of this.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
i thought it said Australia voted for remigration. i was getting excited

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
WE just saw this take place in France

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
first

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Even though Austria voted, make no mistake about it, the Globohomo will circle the wagons and not allow them to lead, 30% verses the traitors.

@katana17
4 days ago
Transcript of last week’s show:

Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
o/

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
hello lads

@lewpers
4 days ago
Isn’t Atomwaffen all feds too? Pretty sure they were exposed during a court case, unless I’m wrong.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
bt?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Iran probably has advanced Russian anti air defenses which would make the Americans think twice

@lewpers
4 days ago
The importance of Iran’s strike is that it has now showed the world that Israel is far from invincible, and without the JEWSA it’d fall overnight.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
that was a good stream with the Israeli sperg

DanTheOracle
4 days ago

@WhiteWalker
hitler tried to not vote his way out of this… he completely failed before quite literally voting his way out of this… change my mind?

Hide replies
DOLO
4 days ago
You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked to begin with. The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star, and i can see that being the case, but don’t forget that the officials were largely on his side as well. Famously the judge at his trial actually sympathized with Hitler, but obviously that wouldn’t happen now.
Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
4 days ago
“You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked”
ok lets argue it…
how many people took power in 1923 vs 1833?
how many people died in 1923 vs 1933 to take power? like, what is the percentage? the ratio between power taken to the loss of your own supporters?
how much more power did the commies get in 1923 vs 1933 because of the putsch?
when were more volumes of mein kampf put into peoples hands? 1923 or a decade later in 1933?
what single positive thing came about because of 1923? you quite literally cant even name one can you?
Less

DanTheOracle
4 days ago
“The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star”
is degrelle here to debate with? because i would be more than happy to debate him on this… but i think ultimately the thing that made hitler a “rock star” wasnt the putsch, it was his unscheduled speech before the DAP long before it even became the NSDAP…. he was sent there by the german government to “spy”on political parties to ensure they werent commies, after a commie gave a speech as to why they should become more marist to the workers, hitler was so incensed he got up to leave in disgust and gave a 15 minute “off the cuff” unscripted speech on how wrong marxists were…. the head of the DAP didnt just want hitler to join his “beer hall” party… but signed the party over to hitler on the spot….
you think that hitler just voting in the beer halls of the time had more or less of an outcome than his speech that won him the whole party?
how many people died in the putsch vs his beer hall speech? what, ultimately won hitler more power? losing members in the putsch? or winning over a whole party without losing even a single member and taking power in the party? im pretty confident i know which was more important.
“Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.”
yea the idea wasnt to agree with me… it wasnt even just to argue with me… it was to change my mind that sitting at home in your basement doing nothing is somehow better than simply voting.. simply voting isnt going to replace them… you need to take as much power anywhere you can while voting is the only thing that will work…
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
is degrelle here to debate with?
He doesn’t need to be, he wrote several books, why don’t you read them and stop sperging out, faggot.

0
1
Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
loooooool fucking owned.
youre the one who was trying to form an argument for it… i simply called you out on your retarded bullshit… i dont need nor want to make your argument for you, youre ment to have the IQ to do that yourself, you completely failed.
nigger level intelligence…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago(edited)
The city of Munich had been stirred to intense feelings for Hitler after the failure of the putsch. There had been not the least sign of solidarity with Kahr and Lossow and their people. In powerless rage, they had pounced on the movement that had made them tremble. Its offices had been closed, the Vélkischer Beobachter banned and all its assets seized. But the harder they hit, the more indignation they aroused. “For some days,” writes Benoist-Méchin, “the people, prey to a strange agitation, have been roaming the streets singing patriotic songs and booing von Kahr.”
“The streets of the city,” adds historian Pierre Soisson, “resounded with enthusiastic cries of Deutschland Erwache (‘Germany Awake’] and ‘Heil Hitler’.” On the day after Hitler’s imprisonment, a referendum was organized at the university. Reproducing the official report of this opinion poll will tell it best: “Meeting at the university: 70 percent for Hitler, 20 percent von Kahr, 10 percent indifferent.
Less

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
wheres degalle so i can answer him and his point? can ya run and grab him for a moment? i would love to explain to him how wrong he is and why exactly hes wrong…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Now you’re making yourself look like an idot. Look up who Léon Degrelle is before making a comment like that.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle
3 days ago
lool its hilarious. only a midwit cant work out im using the absurdity to point out your stupidity…
you really think someone like me does not know about degrelles work, life and arguments for and against his positions?
the fact is im so used to easily winning these little debates and you midwit always end up going “oh yea? well read this thing i read and that will tell you why youre wrong” but in reality i can explain to you why your interpretation of their views
and opinions are wrong and do it in my own words without having to rely on a midwit like you not reading someone elses work to see my point….
but i guess being so new to this you have not worked out how it works or your own views
rather than just parrot someone elses….
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Literally nobody is debating. It’s just you sperging out. There is a difference.

0
1
Continue Thread
WaffleStake
4 days ago
Drew Pavlou is a Gunt Guard for Zionism

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
That national guard if I understand correctly is actually from the disaster area, it’s disgusting.

@KeepAskingForTruth
4 days ago
$3.88
From my dead body my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.

Tendie Research Room
4 days ago
are they late?

0
0

===================

RUMBLE COMMENTS (41) as of Oct 8, 2024.

Dan762
4 days ago
we need yall in America or we need to colab
10 likes

autonomousthought
4 days ago
The argument about Africans not trading their minerals to us is wrong. In a natural state whites could dominate the world through trade alone. Africans would absolutely trade their minerals to us, and for what would be something of miniscule value to whites, just like when we traded with Native Americans. They’d be living in even more squalor than they are now. Keith wasn’t pleading with brown people arguing that we’re nice and can get along. He made a basic argument for self determination of different peoples. Counter signaling that is really weird and dumb
8 likes

› Show 5 replies
WhiteBloke
4 days ago
Rumble is pumping more ads on the replay that fkn jewtube. Unreal.
8 likes

› Show 1 reply
katana17
4 days ago
Last week’s transcript: [Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/28/joel-davis-building-nationalism-from-the-ground-up-sep-26-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: The show has expanded its audience significantly by broadcasting on Twitter. They’ve grown their audience despite being deplatformed from YouTube. They talk about the upcoming Australian Football League grand final weekend, and critique the commercialization and politicization of Australian football, while discussing the potential for politicizing sports for nationalist causes. They discuss the concept of building nationalism from the ground up, and argue that existing institutions have failed and a new movement needs to be built from scratch. Emphasize the importance of organizing white men around a “no compromise white nationalism.” Discuss strategies for building a parallel economy and community for their activists and the need for physical spaces and property for the movement. The challenges of fundraising and managing finances for their organization and the importance of transparency and accountability in handling donations. They critique excessive moralizing and ideological debates within the nationalist movement, and argue for a focus on racial identity as the foundation for their movement, despite the challenges of uniting different factions within white nationalism. National Socialism and its relevance today and strategies for normalizing their ideology and breaking the “spell” of anti-Nazi sentiment. The importance of building a distinctly Australian form of nationalism. The need for white people to collectively fund pro-white organizations and the potential for creating nationalist labor unions. The challenges of digital currencies and financial deplatforming. And more, …
4 likes

Delete
Motion937
3 days ago
I disagree somewhat with Joel when he mentioned Trump supporters in the USA who are rural vs. city dwellers…with city dwellers being more concerned about immigration. I am in a more rural area & am hard core anti-immigration. We are less soft on immigration. In the cities people are actually too tolerant of it. To the point that they are less likely to say anything because of persecution. It puts a target on your back by people who hate you. So people keep quiet about it. The whole thing is complicated. Very much like having friend groups, where the viewpoint changes depending on the quality of people you are associating with. Which is why a larger movement has to grow here so we are not in our little boxes. It needs to become the standard position for all our neighbors as well. I appreciate what you guys are doing, & I follow your channel from here in the USA.
2 likes

IvarHalfdansson
3 days ago
why are they always drinking milk?? weird
1 like

‹ Hide 3 replies
Motion937
2 days ago
Because being healthy & strong is better than being weak. Wanting to be weak is weird.
2 likes

PansophicGothi
2 days ago
It does seem kind of forced lol. Also it’s just the Aryans drinking milk meme from 2016. HWNDU
2 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
because it’s good
1 like

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
Joel is absolutely correct. Croats who feel for Croatia should come home as to be Australian one must be Anglo Celtic. You Dinaric Croats have to come home to Croatia. We need you and it is the best way to say thank you to the Aussies for giving us shelter post WWII. Do it. I did it. Only from our homelands can we truly network and create lasting alliances.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
It would be nice to have you debate or have a conversation with people in the USA like Ben Shapiro to help people gain perspective that they are deprived of. Ben doesn’t have a problem with the USA being subverted with racial demographics & thinks ideology is all that matters. I disagree & align with your way of thinking far more. It would be nice to see you talk with him to help wake people up in the USA as to how cucked we have become. I don’t see that happening because as the Jews have already said before they began their subversion tactics, “Never again.” Well, I would like to get to the point where White Anglo Saxons finally say, “Never again.” Then enforce it with a zero tolerance policy.
1 like

Rockwell1488Pierce
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)!!! https://x.com/joeldavisx https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell https://x.com/b_cottrell89
0 likes

Alimac801
3 days ago
I was a member of the Australian Libertarian Party. I know them well,attended many fundraisers:Ross Cameron and John Ruddick are total zionists and want to engage jewish money.
0 likes

katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript: [Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/10/04/joel-davis-political-existentialism-zionist-hypocrisy-austrians-vote-for-remigration-oct-3-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments. Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel. Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.” Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews. Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.” Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters. They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts. Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.” Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints. Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform. Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe. Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia. Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia. Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities. Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia. Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism. More, …
0 likes

Delete
PansophicGothi
2 days ago
Saying that we’re going to dominate the globe and take whatever we want from everyone is not just bad optics, it’s a non-starter. You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that. It’s an edgelord position at this point. As someone else said, we can get whatever we want through trade, and cheaply. Besides that nothing is really exclusive that white people don’t have access to already, if we want to develop it. We only go to other countries now for slave labor and/or resource exploiting without any environmental concerns. Not only are neither of those Aryan principles, they’re ultimately horrible no matter where we cause it to happen on the globe and will come back to bite us.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
StreamAddict
1 day ago
“You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that.” Yeah because we’re still brainwashed retards, we’re trying to reverse that, obviously. If we actually had white nationalists in power it would be just standard procedure. Of course we just take what we need, within reason, not just go out of our way to create conflict, but if a bunch of africans or something are sitting on shit we need and theyre not cooperating then one way or the other theyre getting out of the way. We dont owe any more fair treatment than the nons would give us so its a reasonable take, just seems crazy now cuz we’re in this ridiculous situation.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PansophicGothi
1 day ago
No one on Earth is ever not going to trade with Whites, that’s a strawman argument. Especially poor brown people, who will be desperate for anything we trade to them and have no use for the things we want. There is no reason for us to go around subjugating everyone else, it’s a net resource drain and also always comes back to bite us later . Wall off their brown nations and leave them there.
0 likes

FJB6666
1 day ago
Which country is taking in all these religion of peace morons????? Australia, we are the pathetic dumping ground for low IQ, allah snackbars. F labor traitors for now endangering Australians security.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
read Mario Palmieri available on Amazon and free pdf online. totally great.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
thanks guys. so many others are pretending to be natty because of elections and it’s really enervating. Hey yo y’all ya hear what Tim Pool and Candace Owens said yo? They get real spicy every four years for some reason. So sick of the coopting. I’d rather they be true lefties than fake nationalists.
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“A short time ago Mrs. Besant, in an interesting essay, announced that there was only one religion in the world, that all faiths were only versions or perversions of it, and that she was quite prepared to say what it was. According to Mrs. Besant this universal Church is simply the universal self. It is the doctrine that we are really all one person; that there are no real walls of individuality between man and man. If I may put it so, she does not tell us to love our neighbors; she tells us to be our neighbors. That is Mrs. Besant’s thoughtful and suggestive description of the religion in which all men must find themselves in agreement. And I never heard of any suggestion in my life with which I more violently disagree. I want to love my neighbor not because he is I, but precisely because he is not I. I want to adore the world, not as one likes a looking-glass, because it is one’s self, but as one loves a woman, because she is entirely different. If souls are separate love is possible. If souls are united love is obviously impossible. A man may be said loosely to love himself, but he can hardly fall in love with himself, or, if he does, it must be a monotonous courtship. If the world is full of real selves, they can be really unselfish selves. But upon Mrs. Besant’s principle the whole cosmos is only one enormously selfish person. It is just here that Buddhism is on the side of modern pantheism and immanence. And it is just here that Christianity is on the side of humanity and liberty and love. Love desires personality; therefore love desires division. It is the instinct of Christianity to be glad that God has broken the universe into little pieces, because they are living pieces. It is her instinct to say “little children love one another” rather than to tell one large person to love himself… (to be continued in next comment)
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the intellectual abyss between Buddhism and Christianity; that for the Buddhist or Theosophist personality is the fall of man, for the Christian it is the purpose of God, the whole point of his cosmic idea. *The world-soul of the Theosophists asks man to love it only in order that man may throw himself into it. But the divine centre of Christianity actually threw man out of it in order that he might love it. The oriental deity is like a giant who should have lost his leg or hand and be always seeking to find it; but the Christian power is like some giant who in a strange generosity should cut off his right hand, so that it might of its own accord shake hands with him.* We come back to the same tireless note touching the nature of Christianity; all modern philosophies are chains which connect and fetter; Christianity is a sword which separates and sets free. No other philosophy makes God actually rejoice in the separation of the universe into living souls. But according to orthodox Christianity this separation between God and man is sacred, because this is eternal. That a man may love God it is necessary that there should be not only a God to be loved, but a man to love him. All those vague theosophical minds for whom the universe is an immense melting-pot are exactly the minds which shrink instinctively from that earthquake saying of our Gospels, which declare that the Son of God came not with peace but with a sundering sword. The saying rings entirely true even considered as what it obviously is; the statement that any man who preaches real love is bound to beget hate. It is as true of democratic fraternity as a divine love; *sham love ends in compromise and common philosophy; but real love has always ended in bloodshed.*
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
Yet there is another and yet more awful truth behind the obvious meaning of this utterance of our Lord. According to Himself the Son was a sword separating brother and brother that they should for an aeon hate each other. But the Father also was a sword, which in the black beginning separated brother and brother, so that they should love each other at last. This is the meaning of that almost insane happiness in the eyes of the mediaeval saint in the picture. This is the meaning of the sealed eyes of the superb Buddhist image. The Christian saint is happy because he has verily been cut off from the world; he is separate from things and is staring at them in astonishment. But why should the Buddhist saint be astonished at things? — since there is really only one thing, and that being impersonal can hardly be astonished at itself. There have been many pantheist poems suggesting wonder, but no really successful ones. The pantheist cannot wonder, for he cannot praise God or praise anything as really distinct from himself. Our immediate business here, however, is with the effect of this Christian admiration (which strikes outwards, towards a deity distinct from the worshipper) upon the general need for ethical activity and social reform. And surely its effect is sufficiently obvious. There is no real possibility of getting out of pantheism, any special impulse to moral action. For pantheism implies in its nature that one thing is as good as another; whereas action implies in its nature that one thing is greatly preferable to another. Swinburne in the high summer of his scepticism tried in vain to wrestle with this difficulty. In “Songs before Sunrise,” written under the inspiration of Garibaldi and the revolt of Italy he proclaimed the newer religion and the purer God which should wither up all the priests of the world: ‘What doest thou now Looking Godward to cry I am I, thou art thou, I am low, thou art high, I am thou that thou seekest to find him, find thou but th
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“When the business man rebukes the idealism of his office-boy, it is commonly in some such speech as this: “Ah, yes, when one is young, one has these ideals in the abstract and these castles in the air; but in middle age they all break up like clouds, and one comes down to a belief in practical politics, to using the machinery one has and getting on with the world as it is.” Thus, at least, venerable and philanthropic old men now in their honoured graves used to talk to me when I was a boy. But since then I have grown up and have discovered that these philanthropic old men were telling lies. What has really happened is exactly the opposite of what they said would happen. They said that I should lose my ideals and begin to believe in the methods of practical politicians. Now, I have not lost my ideals in the least; my faith in fundamentals is exactly what it always was. What I have lost is my old childlike faith in practical politics. I am still as much concerned as ever about the Battle of Armageddon; but I am not so much concerned about the General Election. As a babe I leapt up on my mother’s knee at the mere mention of it. No; the vision is always solid and reliable. The vision is always a fact. It is the reality that is often a fraud. As much as I ever did, more than I ever did, I believe in Liberalism. But there was a rosy time of innocence when I believed in Liberals. . . .
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the first principle of democracy: that the essential things in men are the things they hold in common, not the things they hold separately. And the second principle is merely this: that the political instinct or desire is one of these things which they hold in common. Falling in love is more poetical than dropping into poetry. The democratic contention is that government (helping to rule the tribe) is a thing like falling in love, and not a thing like dropping into poetry. It is not something analogous to playing the church organ, painting on vellum, discovering the North Pole (that insidious habit), looping the loop, being Astronomer Royal, and so on. For these things we do not wish a man to do at all unless he does them well. It is, on the contrary, a thing analogous to writing one’s own love-letters or blowing one’s own nose. These things we want a man to do for himself, even if he does them badly. I am not here arguing the truth of any of these conceptions; I know that some moderns are asking to have their wives chosen by scientists, and they may soon be asking, for all I know, to have their noses blown by nurses. I merely say that mankind does recognize these universal human functions, and that democracy classes government among them. In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state. This is democracy; and in this I have always believed.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
But there is one thing that I have never from my youth up been able to understand. I have never been able to understand where people got the idea that democracy was in some way opposed to tradition. It is obvious that tradition is only democracy extended through time. It is trusting to a consensus of common human voices rather than to some isolated or arbitrary record. The man who quotes some German historian against the tradition of the Catholic Church, for instance, is strictly appealing to aristocracy. He is appealing to the superiority of one expert against the awful authority of a mob. It is quite easy to see why a legend is treated, and ought to be treated, more respectfully than a book of history. The legend is generally made by the majority of people in the village, who are sane. The book is generally written by the one man in the village who is mad. Those who urge against tradition that men in the past were ignorant may go and urge it at the Carlton Club, along with the statement that voters in the slums are ignorant. It will not do for us. If we attach great importance to the opinion of ordinary men in great unanimity when we are dealing with daily matters, there is no reason why we should disregard it when we are dealing with history or fable. Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of democracy and tradition; it seems evident to me that they are the same idea.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
The ancient Greeks voted by stones; these shall vote by tombstones. It is all quite regular and official, for most tombstones, like most ballot papers, are marked with a cross.
0 likes
vigilantejustice23
4 days ago
Blair has been annoying me lately, I’m glad he didn’t show up tbh
-2 likes

‹ Hide 6 replies
hadefo
4 days ago
make your own content then. lazy and pathetic
2 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
4 days ago
Why not be specific in your criticism. “Annoying” sounds like the Left when they call conservatives “weird”. What can one do with that info?
1 like

Seanybruv
3 days ago
Annoying you because he gets your brain ticking with interesting and unique perspectives and doesn’t just say what you expect/want someone to say? Honestly, complaining about someone active in the fight for whatever reason, especially something so trivial and subjective as being annoyed, is so feminine, soy, and low T.
1 like

Whatsthefrequencyken
3 days ago
Blair is quirky and somewhat mercurial. It’s not bad to have a stream with just the two grown-ups but I hope he’s back next week.
1 like

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
well I like Blair. I doubt he’s going anywhere. He’s been with the show for a long time.
0 likes

RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
Me too. But what are your reasons?
-4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
EnglandAwake
4 days ago
You sound like a bunch of Jews to be honest.
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript