Henrik Palgren: And welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for tuning in here. I’m Henrik. Glad to have you with us here on Red Ice today. If watching live on Rumble X Twitter, Red Ice TV, Red Ice members, however you’re tuning in, thank you for being here.

 

So, yes, we obviously are going to follow up on the topic we covered a little bit yesterday in terms of the shooting down at Bondi beach in Australia. We have Thomas Sewell back on the show today to cover this. Not only, of course, what’s happened with the shooting, the potential political fallout from this, but there’s other issues, of course, happening. It is interesting, though, because this has been called basically “an intelligence failure” by the Australian, you know, intelligence services, ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organization], I think it’s shortened. As and they’ve been observing obviously the National Socialists, all the Nationalists in Australia, they’re the ones kind of under scrutiny. They’re the ones being investigated, they’re the ones being followed around, arrested, all these things, right?

 

And then you have this blatant, kind of hole here. We will get into whether or not this is intentional. Did they drop the guard? What’s really happening? I have a lot of questions, as always. As you should, I think, which is healthy around these events and how it’s being used.

 

But it’s clear just on the official level, if you look at it, what they’re saying that this is. Obviously this is a massive failure then in the sense of not observing the actual terrorists in the country like this. Well, first of all, he was Pakistani. Then they’re coming back and saying now he was originally born in India, but who cares? What’s the difference? Right? So, Tom Sewell, welcome back. Good to see you again. How are you?

 

Thomas Sewell: Good, thanks. Thank you for having me on the show again. And yes, it’s been eventful as always. There’s plenty to talk about and very exciting times ahead. A lot of controversy. Did you want to start with Bondi first?

 

Henrik Palgren: I think. So why don’t we clear, well, it’s not just clearing it off the plate. It’s such a big thing. It’s really the main story we should lead with here, obviously. I’m not sure we have to reiterate it, but obviously, yes, we had a shooting on the 14th Australian time then. So it’s on the 14th, December 14th. And obviously, yeah, just explain what you, what your initial kind of, I guess, you know, way that you view this is not strange. We knew that this is like “part and parcel” now of being in a multicultural, multiracial country like Australia has been turned into against all of our desires. But still, were you surprised by this?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, absolutely not! And myself and most of the leadership of the organization have commented that we’re surprised that it doesn’t happen more often and that it took this long considering the rhetoric we’ve experienced from Muslims in Australia over the past couple years.

 

And I’m not just talking about rhetoric in terms of the Palestinian protests in the city every week. I’m talking about just everyday Muslims that you might come across on job sites or if you train at a commercial gym, whether it be a fighting gym, or a lifting gym. The rhetoric out of Muslims has been very extreme! Like we would call it Fed postie. We don’t get away with that kind of rhetoric.

 

But it’s just commonplace within the Muslim community to sort of talk about and advocate for this sort of stuff. So yeah. Where do you want to go with this? I can go into more detail.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, so we talked about it yesterday a little bit as well, obviously of the shooters and everything else. And first of all, do you trust what you’re hearing from the police and the mainstream government sources on this?

 

[04:04]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I don’t. As a general rule, I don’t trust the police and the mainstream media. But this is something that’s too big to fool.

 

I mean, there were thousands, … I mean, there’s a lot of Americans sharing kind of schizophrenic conspiracy theories about it. There’s a few odd videos that I do admit there’s a few videos that look, the guy was probably just missing his shots. I don’t think he was shooting blanks. There’s a whole bunch of schizo theories out there. Most people don’t know how populated Bondi [pronounced bond-eye] beach is in Sydney, Australia.

 

So most Americans, they can’t fathom that this happened at the most populated place in Sydney, like almost more populated than the CBD. If you’ve ever been a Bondi beach, there are just potentially tens of thousands of people there are thousands and thousands of witnesses. Yeah, I really dislike the way that so many people on the dissonant right are trying to transmute this into some sort of conspiracy theory. Sometimes Muslims just kill people!

 

Henrik Palgren: So strange1 No!

 

Thomas Sewell: And in this case, they very obviously targeted a jewish event. A predominantly jewish. Well, not a predominantly jewish event. A jewish event that had maybe a couple hundred people attend. But again, it was at a beach where there’s tens of thousands of Aussies and tourists.

 

I mean, I’ve parked my car literally by that bridge. Like, when I’ve gone to Sydney, I’ve visited Bondi Beach, I don’t know every second time that I’ve gone to Sydney, so probably 20 or 30 times over my life. And I’ve parked my car at that very spot. I know exactly where that is. You know, where that big, surf house is, the big clubhouse there. You have lunch just on the other side of the road from that shooting.

 

So it was recognizable immediately. The reaction from the police was to be expected. It was typical. I mean, seeing the police just take so long to react, that’s pretty common in Australia. If you’re a White nationalist, they’ll pull the gun out on you like the millisecond. [chuckling] I think they rev themselves up when they come to your house. I think the police in Australia are a bit different to the police in America. They’re not sort of combat aware, they’re not psychologically trained to deal with these sort of scenarios.

 

Whereas I think in America the threat level of gun violence is so high, or at least they’re trained to expect a high level of gun violence. Whereas in Australia, the police don’t have any balls unless they’ve got like two hours to psychologically prepare for kicking your door in. Because every time I’ve had issues with police, you know, there’ll be 10 or 20 of them and they already have the guns out and they’re ready to shoot you while you’re trying to answer your door.

 

But when there’s an actual active shooter situation, I mean, they’re just hiding behind cars and you saw like two of the female police officers have mental breakdowns. It was just really embarrassing.

 

What else? I mean, yeah, my understanding was that, sorry, I’ll let you go. There’s so much to cover.

 

Henrik Palgren: So of course we had Arsen Ostrovsky coming out early. And of course this is one of the reasons why I had questions about it I mean, he literally came to Australia. He said in the clip here we could play it in a moment, but like three weeks ago to fight anti-semitism, and this was heightened. The whole jewish community has allegedly like, warned that this was going to happen. There was a number of posts from the Australian jewish Association. They were talking about this was very foreseeable and stuff like that. And of course I’m gonna say:

 

“Yeah, they’re probably right.”

 

Because they’re knowing what’s happening here. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s very foreseeable because you have an ongoing war between Zionists and I guess just jews in general and the Palestinians in the Middle East. And they’re killing, I don’t know, somewhere between 10 and 100 Arabs a day over in the Middle East. And the way most people’s brains work, and especially the way Arabs brains work is. Yeah, they don’t recognize borders, they don’t care. And these weren’t even Arabs, technically, this father and son team. I guess they were Arabs in the sense of what etymologically the word Arab means, which is mixed. They’re a mixed population. They’re a mongrel population.

 

But I believe these two were half Indian, half Italian.

 

Henrik Palgren: Really?

 

Thomas Sewell: And yes. Yeah. So the father is an Indian national and the son was born in Australia to an Indian father and I believe an Italian mother. So he’s mixed race, and he’s converted to Islam, which is what Islam is. It’s a mongrel rape gang. It’s where all the mongrels go and convert and join the big brown alliance gang together. And he received a little bit of training in the Philippines, so he probably went over to the Philippines to not just do military training, but also to probably get a blessing from ISIS, because there is an ISIS cell in the Philippines.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s what the Intel is saying is that this guy was on a watch list from 2019 or 2020 that ASIO were keeping an eye on him because of obviously what he was posting on the Internet and the mosque that he was hanging out at. So he was actually a junior scholar at one of the more further down the line Sunni mosques here in Sydney. And he was not an imam or anything like that. Not highly trained, but he’s obviously gone through to religiously study Islam. He’s not just like a Friday Muslim that’s just casually gone down there. He has actually completed like his basic diplomas in understanding Islamic studies. And clearly he’s educated in Islam enough to know that if you want your 72 virgins, you got to go kill jews.

 

So he completed his education with that act. You could say if you understand Islam. And his father, I don’t know much about the father, but I do know that he’s an Indian national.

 

[10:39]

 

Henrik Palgren: The father was killed.

 

Thomas Sewell: The father was killed. The son just came out of the coma, just today. The news was saying just today he’s awoken from his coma.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay. Yeah, because you saw random other Aussies attacking the crew there on the bridge obviously too. And the police couldn’t, like, they didn’t know what was going on. They didn’t have any control of the situation. And guys were just moving in. They were even going after another random brown guy, … They were like these White Aussies, … [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: The footage I saw was that the first guy on the bridge to try to disarm them was a brown guy. And the one of the cops shot at him while he had his hands up.

 

Henrik Palgren: Wow!

 

Thomas Sewell: And then a whole bunch of Aussies jumped the bridge and tried to attack. Yeah, this is the footage here. So a bunch of Aussies are attacking because he’s wearing a black Tshirt.

 

So it’s like an Arab in a black Tshirt. And so people obviously thought that was the same guy, but he was actually the first to run up there to be a hero and then the next two Aussies that went up there to also be heroes. That’s one thing that’s interesting is you’ve got female cops literally hiding behind cars and having mental breakdowns. And you’ve got Baz here with his shirt off, two other Aussies and an Arab guy running up there hero style, unarmed to try to tackle these guys and disarm them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And you’ve also got, I think earlier you had that old jewish, … Oh no, he wasn’t jewish, he was a Coptic Christian. I think old Coptic Christian guy, another Arab, attack him and take the shotgun off him, but not shoot him because apparently the shotgun was out of ammunition and then he ended up getting shot I think in the arm.

 

So it’s a chaotic situation obviously. There’s nothing suspicious about it in my opinion. I think that we should really focus on the principle that we need to be a sovereign country here in Australia. And this incident is caused by the fact that we have warring tribes in our nation! And the fault of this is the government for allowing the jews and allowing Muslims into our country when they have no place! They have no place in our country. And it doesn’t matter whether one is the victim and one is the attacker. This is caused by inter-ethnic or inter-religious conflict overseas and these problems are here. And I would have the same opinion if it was any group of people. But I especially have this opinion when it’s non-White people, when it’s brown people or desert people that are killing each other. We just don’t want these dramas here.

 

And this is the result of not just multiculturalism, but it’s also, yeah, the result of having a very powerful jewish lobby in this country. I mean this jewish event, these weren’t nobody jews. These were actual serious Zionists, they were serious jewish leaders.

 

And I think it’s a very fair assumption to make based off the full 10 minute footage that I’ve seen that these two went down there, these two Indian Muslims went down there with the intention to kill as many jews as possible. And I think that they also wounded about 40 other people.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, right.

 

Thomas Sewell: And we don’t have the full list of names of all the people killed and wounded, although at least half of the names of those killed have been released already. And they appear, I think 11 out of the 12 that we have the names of do appear to be jewish. There’s one name there that appears to be potentially, … Is that one is that, …

 

Henrik Palgren: That guy, Peter Meagher. He was there as a freelance photographer to actually shoot some photos for the Hanukkah party, I believe. But that’s one White guy.

 

I was looking at the bridge, and you can see. I mean, again, I don’t know what the like, how big was the field that the jews were in at the Hanukkah event there. But he fires this way, this way, that way. It looked like he was just shooting, like, everywhere on the beach that he basically could. That’s what it looked like to me. So first I was just kind of like:

 

“Was it a coincidence?”

 

You know, because that could happen. But I don’t know. Maybe it was publicly announced or something.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was a publicly announced event.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: By one of the, I think it’s a Chabad. I don’t know if I’m pronouncing it right.

 

Henrik Palgren: Chabad. All in there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It was a publicly announced event, and it’s very obvious. Again, I don’t have any more information than the media have already put out, but I think based on the Facebook posts of this, I mean, one of the jews that was killed was a pretty serious rabbi that had just gone back from Israel, and he was signing munitions over in Israel.

 

[15:32]

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, look, it was an international event. There were jews from France there, there was at least a couple from Israel, I think, and, of course, Arsen Ostrovsky was one of them. And, it’s a different mindset. Right. Like, if I’d be in a situation like this. I’d be like. I wouldn’t take a selfie at that point. I wouldn’t kind of push so hard politically.

 

But then you realize that’s how motivated these people are, that if these pieces lined up the way that they did and he just happens to be there, what is it? A human rights lawyer out of Israel or whatever to fight anti-semitism in Australia, he happens to find themselves there again, you can have questions about it, I think, but you don’t have to go into conspiracy.

 

But the point is, this is how they’re thinking. That’s what I want to say, Tom. If this happens, it’s immediately use it!:

 

“Like, second one, boom! Let’s go! Propaganda, push our issues!”

 

That’s what happens.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, look, I got a few things to say on that.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: When Carl Rittenhouse shot into a group of Antifa. When he was getting attacked, he took out two pedophiles.

 

So when you, not randomly, but when you’re getting attacked by Antifa, and if you take down two of them, there’s a strong chance that they’re a pedophile, that they’re a sex offender. And I don’t think it’s suspicious that two Muslims planned a terror attack to kill a bunch of jews. And it happened to be, out of the couple hundred jews that were there, there happened to be human rights lawyers and like, huge Zionist advocates. And I think you’d find it in a crowd of two or three hundred jews, especially, … And these weren’t secular jews. That’s an important point, is this wasn’t a secular jewish meeting. This wasn’t like:

 

“Hey, jews, come to the park and hang out!”

 

These were jews from the local synagogue in Bondi. And Bondi is a relatively jewish area. So it’s a touristy area, and it has a huge amount of rich White people that live there, but there’s also quite a large jewish population there. There’s, like a jewish enclave there, a wealthy jewish enclave there.

 

So there are some synagogues in Bondi, and this was one of the local synagogues that organized this. And they’re like:

 

“Yep, let’s do our thing down at the beach.”

 

So, yeah, there’s really nothing suspicious about this except there’s one video of the old man missing, like, three or four shots. And I mean, I don’t think that’s overly suspicious. I mean, it’s at close range, but, I mean, adrenaline, who knows?

 

Henrik Palgren: Right? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I haven’t seen anything other than that one video of him missing three shots. Like what? Yeah, it’s not Call of Duty. There’s just a lot of firearms experts on the Internet. There’s a lot of people that are just really quick to call:

 

“Oh, it’s Mossad! It’s Mossad! It’s Mossad!”

 

And it’s like, no, sometimes Muslims just kill people. And we have a really bad, you know, sort of subculture, I think, within the broader spectrum of White nationalism and dissident politics, where:

 

“Everything’s a conspiracy! And everything is like Mossad’s behind everything! There’s Mossad in your skirting board listening to you!”

 

And it’s like, this is just paranoia. Sometimes it’s just an actual terrorist attack. Now, if I’m presented with evidence that there was a Mossad connection, but all I’ve seen is AI, fake edits. Yeah, just Photoshop. I’ve just seen garbage! I’ve just seen the most low rent garbage! Psyop! You know, the real psyop is people thinking everything’s Mossad. I think that’s the real Mossad psyop.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, interesting point. Yeah. No, I’m not the one who immediately that’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Did you see Baz? That’s what put him in the coma.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I figured. Right. Because I’m not sure if the other guy there, he, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Sorry. No, no, that’s the wrong one. No, no, sorry. It was a different head stomp. There was a different guy that kicked. So Baz kicked the father, old man in the head, but another younger guy, a fitter younger guy with tattoos, kicked the other one in the head.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So before this footage.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, so okay, so moving on from whether:

 

“This was it a planned event! They knew it was going to happen. They knew the worst cops that day was, … They were running the shift then, these females. Because then you have mass impact.”

 

Okay, putting that to the side for now. It is what it is. We’re just looking at it for what it is. It’s then you come back to the official, you know, world in terms of the failure of the police, of the intelligence services. And the point of priority too, right? Because there is a kind of a, there’s blame here.

 

Like as much resources and effort and time and ultimately then money and manpower is being spent on you and on your group and people around you. Joel [Davis] and [Jacob] Hersant, all these people around there to monitor you and to arrest you and keep an eye on you and spy on you go to the park to box and then there they are. They have men assigned to just watching you guys. Right? That kind of stuff.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Is this gonna force them to get their act together? Are they going to start taking the Muslim issues seriously? Is it going to be enough pressure from the jewish community that then that’s when they listen, right? When jews are murdered now they’re going to actually do something about this. What do you think they’re going to happen here, the next stage in this?

 

[21:01]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: In theory, you’re correct. In theory, when jews are affected, then you’ll see genuine pressure against Muslims. But what you’ll find is the jews are experts at transmuting any anti-Islamic energy into just being energy around anti-semitism in general. And you can already see the Labor Party for those that aren’t aware in America, the Labor Party here in Australia is kind of like our version of the Democrat Party. It’s the center-Left, so-called center-Left party. And you’ve got Tony Burke who’s the sort of, he heads the State Department. I think he’s the Home Affairs Minister. You’ve got the Prime Minister Albanese and you’ve got another guy who I’ve never seen on TV before, which is funny, they keep him hidden from TV. I think he’s the Defense Minister. His name is I think Murphy, and he is the gayest I have ever seen on Australian television. No, not Murphy. Marles. His name is Marles.*

 

[*The minister for defence is the minister of state of the Commonwealth of Australia charged with overseeing the organization, implementation, and formulation of strategic policy in defence and military matters as the head of the Department of Defence. The minister for defence is responsible for the Australian Defence Organization, including the Australian Defence Force (ADF). The current defence minister is Richard Marles, who is also concurrently serving as deputy prime minister of Australia, having been selected by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in May 2022 following the 2022 Australian federal election.]

 

And all three of them senior Labor Party guys, they are just getting roasted at the moment for their failure. And they are basically trying to transmute and put the blame back onto Nazis saying:

 

“Well, our government has done the most to shut down hate speech. Our government has done the most to stop anti-semitism. Our government banned the Nazi salute. Our government has been going after these neo-Nazis!”

 

And on several occasions journalists have cut them off and have said:

 

“Hang on a minute, what are you going to do about these Muslims?”

 

Because obviously even though the media are very controlled in their nature, it’s really hard for the media to hold the party line together that the Labor Party are trying to hold together, which is “that this is a broad stroke anti-semitism issue” and then transmute it from broad smoke, broad stroke anti-semitism onto:

 

“Look how much we’ve done to stop Nazis!”

 

And the mainstream media even covered the deportation of Matthew Gruter after [before] this terrorist attack. So those that don’t know who Matthew Gruter is, he’s a member of our organization. He was a South African national that was here on a work Visa who attended an “expose jewish power” rally. I think it was “Abolish the jewish Lobby” rally. And he was doxed and deported. He was raided within, I think a day or two of him being doxed and he was put in a camp and then deported from that camp.

 

And so look, there’s nothing, the Australian government’s got no issues with putting people in camps and deporting them, which is interesting. And the media even mentioned:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this guy didn’t break any law and he was deported.”

 

And yet this son and this father were both, … Yeah, you’ve got the old video there.

 

So there’s a new video where they actually started talking about him in reference to the fact that these two terrorists had traveled in and out of the country on several occasions to potentially receive military training.

 

And so you have people that are on a watch list for being involved with the Islamic State and training with the Islamic State and they own firearms. That’s another important point.

 

So this is Tony Burke. This is one of the faggots that personally had Matthew Gruter deported. He’s going to be deported to the Congo. We’re going to make sure that this faggot here, Tony Burke, is deported to the Congo. And that’s Penny Wong, the Chinese foreign minister.

 

Henrik Palgren: What could go wrong! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: But, yeah, Wong! Yeah. A former Australian Prime Minister:

 

“Two Wongs don’t make a White!”

 

Like back in the 50s or 60s, I think it was Harold Holt, or whoever came after him said:

 

“Two Wongs don’t make a White!”

 

Back then we were based and someone tried to bring their Asian war bride over from the Korean War and they denied access to the war bride or maybe they snuck her into the country. And then they were basically trying. They were trying to deport like, the one brown person that had been let into [chuckling] the country that year! And yeah, the prime minister said something like “two Wongs don’t make a White” when the media asked him why he was being deported. And even though technically be one Wong.

 

But anyway, yeah, so where was I going? I mean, it’s just they’re trying to obviously transmute this atrocity or this terrorist attack into being another battering ram against White Australia, against Neo-Nazis, against anti-semitism in general. What can they do? I don’t think they can do much except hot air. They’re not going to be able to change the laws in any way that’s going to be able to stop us from operating.

 

The way that the Labour Party has reacted to this has caused a huge amount of mainstream media condemnation. I mean, the mainstream media even played on national television, these Labor Party MPs, both state and federal MPs, rocking up to press conferences and getting booed by the public and getting booed by the jewish community.

 

So that’s very rare! They don’t usually show that on television. So the Labor Party is definitely just getting smashed at the moment.

 

But again, it’s that usual trick of “jew Left and jew Right”. And what they’re doing is they’re now really promoting the Liberal Party as being the only party that’s going to save the jews, and the Labor Party doesn’t have the balls to save the jews. And there’s a lot of layers to that.

 

So for example, the reason why these senior Labor Party like the Prime Minister, the Defense Minister and the Home affairs minister, the reason why they won’t call out the Muslims and why they’re trying to deflect it onto neo-Nazis is because the Labor Party can’t get elected into office without the Muslim vote and without the Indian vote. And these two were both Muslim and Indian!

 

[27:00]

 

So they don’t want to talk about the fact that he was an Indian national and he should have been deported. Obviously we shouldn’t have any Indians in the country. But even by their own metrics and by their own standards of fit and proper person checks, which is another important thing to bring up, is that it is quite hard to get a gun license in Australia if you’re a political dissident. It is not hard to get a gun license. The way that Australian gun laws work. Because I know Americans love saying:

 

“You guys gave up your guns. You, Australia doesn’t have any guns!”

 

That’s not true at all! And that’s just like what we don’t have is civilian access to military style firearms like semi-autos. Yeah, we don’t have access to semi-autos unless there’s a caveat to that, which is unless you’re what’s called a primary producer, or a professional hunter.

 

So if you have a contract, even if it’s just as low as like, I don’t know, $5,000 a year to contract shoot on people’s property, to shoot pests. Even if those pests are like foxes or something, or rabbits. You can get access to an AR15 in this country.

 

So it’s not true that we don’t have guns in this country. We have quite high gun ownership as a nation. And to get a CatAB which is basically rim fires and center fires, but in bolt action or pump. So we can get pump and bolt action. Like the rifle that this terrorist was using is called a Cat B rifle.

 

So what that means is it’s a bolt action rifle, it’s center fired, high powered and there’s not even a magazine capacity on it. Usually when you buy the rifles they come with a five or ten round magazine. It’s not actually illegal to own larger magazines. It doesn’t look good when the police come to inspect your safe. Which again, if you’re not a political dissident. It will very rarely happen. Most licensed firearm owners might only get a safe inspection once every five or 10 years. And it’ll just be two local cops. They’ll knock on your door, they’ll usually call you 24 hours beforehand and they’ll say

 

“Hi, I’m Sergeant so and so from the local police station, I need to come check your guns. I’ll be there tomorrow at nine o’ clock in the morning.”

 

And then you obviously make sure you’ve got all your shit squared away. They rock up to your house, they knock on your door, you let the two cops in, they have a look at your safe, they talk to you about what the weather’s doing and you know, how the Labor Party’s gay and try to be a friend and then they leave. And that’s basically what the local firearm section of the cops do. Because they know that every gun owner is all the vast, vast majority of gun owners are Right-wing and they’re just patriots, but they don’t have any views outside of just very common sense, low level patriotism and gun ownership or libertarianism. And there’s really very little dramas there.

 

So you can get that rifle that he’s shooting there, you can get that by just going down to the police station, filling out some paperwork, doing a one day course on firearm safety and then applying to become a member of any gun club or getting a Crown hunting permit. So a permit to hunt on Crown land.

 

Henrik Palgren: Do you have to be a member of a gun club?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Same as Sweden, basically.

 

Thomas Sewell: You can’t own a rifle in Australia for the purpose of self defense.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: You have to either you either own it because you target shoot at a gun club or you own it because you go hunting on Crown land. And all you need to do is, I think to hunt on Crown land, I think you pay 50 bucks a year or something. I used to be a licensed and registered gun owner. Obviously when I got involved in dissident politics I sold my guns and transferred them into other people’s names, just so that I didn’t have any ownership of guns. Because I could predict that they would use that as an opportunity to raid my house. And I’d heard of people that were involved in dissident politics, they went from never having a gun safe inspection to having like multiple gun safe inspections per year. And it was never just the two local cops. There would be two local cops that would come down and they’d have a weird look on their face like:

 

“Oh, hi!”

 

And they would rock up unannounced. That was another thing. Whereas normally they would always call you. And they would have six guys in suits, you know, rock up with them.

 

And it’s like:

 

“Oh, who are these people? What?”

 

And they’re just like:

 

“Oh, we’re just here for the gun inspection. Oh, what police station are you from? Oh, we’re from the city. Oh, what are you doing here? Oh, we’re just having a look.”

 

And then they’re not looking at your guns, what they’re doing. The two cops are looking at your guns, making sure that it’s all stored properly.

 

The other six cops are walking through your house, going through your drawers because they’re the STASI* and they’re going through your bookshelf, they’re going through your drawers, they’re going through your cupboards. And until you tell them to stop and get out of your house, they’ll go through everything. They might even ask if they can go through your phone.

 

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

 

And if you’re an idiot, you’d be like:

 

“Oh, okay.”

 

So there’s a lot of naive people that get screwed over.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: But yeah, I’ve never seen anyone that’s a face doxed nationalist be allowed to keep their guns.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

[31:57]

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s when we talk about system failure, the government does not let face doxed nationalists own guns, no matter how tame you make your talking points.

 

And yet these guys they can get up to what they’re up to and at no stage do they, because the law is very subjective. We don’t have the right to own guns. What we have is what’s called a “fit and proper person” check, which is completely subjective. There’s no legal definition of that. There isn’t. I actually went to the Magistrates Court to prove I was a fit and proper person because they try to take my, … I used to be trained to be an Armor Guard. I never actually did Armor Guard work, I did unarmed security work, but I was trained to be an Armor Guard, so I could have bought a pistol if I wanted to because I was trained to be an Armor Guard and I had an a pistol license, even though I never owned a pistol and I had issues. I did a pistol shoot one time and the police called me and said:

 

“Hey, you’re not allowed to do a pistol shoot, you’re not fitting proper.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yes, I am. I have a gun license.”

 

Even though I handed my guns in and stuff. I still had my gun license. And they said:

 

“Hey, you got to go to the Magistrates Court and sort this out immediately or you’re going to get charged.”

 

And so I went down the Magistrates Court and did like, it was called like a section 109, fit and proper person thingy. And the Magistrates Court confirmed that I was in fact fit and proper. And I was like, “phew”, you know what I mean? Like, kind of wiped my brow. This is really early days when I was really early involved in politics.

 

But it was a big stress, like I was going to potentially, and I had a clean criminal record back then, so I was really stressed about having a firearms offense. But I had the court confirm I was fit and proper. And yeah, these guys should not have been able to be classed as fit and proper.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Well, that’s the thing. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Completely subjective.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, obviously. Right. Unfortunately, that’s just those other conditions now with these people in charge of the governments.

 

“Bondi terrorists given gun license after ASIO investigated son’s, …”

 

Thomas Sewell: Sorry to interrupt. It’s pronounced ‘Ay Zee Oh’.

 

Henrik Palgren: ASIO investigated son’s Islamic State links.

 

Thomas Sewell: So again, here’s another interesting thing to interrupt. Sorry.

 

But when the labor government came to power. Sorry, when they were re-elected, they. When they did all their like, banning of the Nazi salute stuff. Banned the Nazi salute, they banned the swastika, but in the same legislation they actually decriminalized the ISIS flag.

 

Henrik Palgren: Really?

 

Thomas Sewell: So the Liberal Party made the ISIS flag a terror symbol and they made it illegal. And the Labor Party changed the legislation when they came to power and banned the swastika and then decriminalized the ISIS flag. So you can own an ISIS flag in Australia, but you can’t, … Sorry. You can publicly display an ISIS flag in Australia, but you cannot publicly display a swastika.

 

Henrik Palgren: Huh, Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So that’s pretty funny. They didn’t need to do that. Like this ISIS flag was already banned and they didn’t need to touch that legislation. Why did they decriminalize it?

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, it’s a feature maybe not a bug. So I don’t know!

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s a huge Muslim voting bloc in Australia and, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Obviously you’ve got an understanding of European politics like Nordic politics. But most Americans in the dissident Right, I think they’re really blind to the Islamic issue.

 

I mean, I noticed after the Aug 31st rally which was that big March for Australia rally where I spoke in front of, I don’t know, somewhere between 20,000 and 50,000 people. You know, is it from the TRS? Is that what they’re called? The Right Stuff? Eric Striker.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: I saw Eric Striker, … Well, I was in jail, so someone mailed it to me. But while I was in jail, I got mail. And it was a screenshot of like an Eric Striker tweet saying that:

 

“I’m like a judeophile and that I love jews and that you know, I’m against Muslims because I love jews.”

 

And just crazy shit! Like, I’ve been an anti-semite, a public anti-semite for probably six or so years.

 

Henrik Palgren: You’re a proven anti-semite! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: I am [chuckling] a proven anti-semite and everything. But he was dissecting that part of my speech where I said:

 

“When the people waving the Palestinian flags and the Aboriginal flags came charging at us, we fought back.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I haven’t had a chance to clarify that on stream. That actually happened. I haven’t done a response to that, but I want people to know that actually happened.

 

And this idea that we should not fight back against Palestinians when they’re punching us in the head or communists waving Palestinian flags so that we can one struggle with them against the Zionists, that’s fucking crazy! We’re in Australia. I’m not in the Middle East. Like, I’m not picking a side on the Middle East in the Middle East. I’m picking Australia, in Australia.

 

So to be fair to the Palestinians, to be fair to the Palestinians and the Arabs to give some context to that, usually they rally every weekend in Australia, in Melbourne, in Sydney and Brisbane, there’s a big rally of Arabs every single weekend in the CBD. And it’s usually 3/4 or 7/8 Muslim, you know, Arabs and 1/4 or 1/8 communists that are trying to subvert it and control them. And what they’ve done is they’ve created a brown alliance where they’re waving Abo flags and they’re waving Palestinian flags because they’re trying to convert the Muslims to being on the side of the communists for the Aboriginal issue.

 

[37:46]

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So:

 

“We’re not anti-zionists. We’re anti-colonialists! And the Zionists are a problem because they’re colonialists. It’s not because they’re Zionists. It’s because they’re colonialists. And because they’re jewish nationalists.”

 

Which I guess is what zionism is.

 

But it’s not a specific form of anti-semitism. They’re trying to, instead of it being counter jewish or counter anti-semitism, the communist groups are trying to convert all these Arabs to the cause. Now they’ve been very unsuccessful broadly, but they have converted a small percentage.

 

And so on that day, on August 31st, the vast majority of Arabs didn’t show up. The vast majority. So normally that weekend rally, that pro-Palestine rally, is normally, as I said, 7/8 Arab, 1/8th communist. On that day it was almost the other way around. It was probably 3/4 communist, 1/4 Arab. So the vast, vast majority of Arabs. And we had leaks because we’ve got people in their group chats to keep an eye on. We had leaks from their group chats saying:

 

“We ’re not going down, this is the reason why we’re not going down, don’t attend, we’re just going to have a week off. We still care about the cause, obviously, but it’s not a good idea. We don’t want a front on confrontation with March for Australia because it doesn’t achieve what we want to achieve, which is we want Australians having sympathy for Palestine. And so if we let the March for Australia people rally this weekend and wave the Aussie flags, we should stay the hell away from them so that it doesn’t interfere with our kind of our optics.”

 

They were optics cucking. They were like:

 

“We’re not going to rally this week.”

 

And so the vast, vast majority of Arabs did not come down. They didn’t want that confrontation. But some still came down.

 

And so it’s just crazy, like, yes, and it’s similar to this Bondi incident. So the context of the Bondi incident is, did he wave away most Arabs and most White Australians? You can see in that 10 minute footage the two terrorists on several occasions wave away, the young guy at least, waved away heaps of Aussies and Arabs that were swearing at him, that were carrying on, that were getting close to them. There was a lot of people, a lot of Aussies that were coming up from the other side, not from the beach, but from the other side that were saying like:

 

“What are you doing? Stop what you’re doing!”

 

Like that kind of rhetoric. And there was a bunch of women screaming like:

 

“Oh my God, stop!”

 

Like that’s gonna help! And he was just, you could see him, he’s like waving him away. He’s like:

 

“Piss off! Go away!”

 

And a lot of the guys like having a go at him had beards, whether they were Aussies or whether they’re Arabs. So obviously he wasn’t going to shoot anyone that was like Arab looking with a beard. So he did pick his target, that’s very clear. But that doesn’t mean that White Australians weren’t shot on the day.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: So again, again, I’m getting ankle bit by individuals who are saying:

 

“Oh, he put out a post about White Australians, but this was an attack on jews.”

 

And it’s like, I’m aware that it was predominantly an attack on jews and the media have been talking non-stop about jews since it happened and our responsibility is White Australians. I don’t have a responsibility for jews, I have a responsibility for White Australians.

 

So I think it’s very important that we try to retake some of that narrative because the politicians have said nothing about how this is an attack on Australians, let alone White Australians.

 

Obviously the politicians aren’t going to say this is an attack on White Australians.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: But I mean, I saw one of the opposition leaders come out with a post just today and, sorry, it was a video, and he said:

 

“This terrorist attack is an attack on the jewish community. And although it’s disrespectful to Australians this is the primary issue is that it’s an attack on the jewish community and it’s about hatred and we have to stop hatred of jews.”

 

And it’s like, hang on a minute. Disrespectful to Australians? Like there’s a little bit more than disrespectful to Australians! Yeah, I mean the idea that shooting at Australians is:

 

“It’s disrespectful, but it’s not driven by hate of Australia and Australia’s values. It’s driven by hatred of jews!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. So the call that you’ve seen then is obviously, yes, the jewish community seems to be mobilizing around, targeting Albanese and the Labor government, obviously that they want them out. I think I even heard, is it Sharri Markson* on Sky News, the jewish host there? She was talking about how Albanese had, I forget exactly what the word is. I’m paraphrasing, but it’s like “have emboldened or aided Hamas” or something in Australia. Is there any truth to that? Or is it like, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, yeah, give me your take on that.

 

* Sharri Markson (born 8 March 1984) is a Jewish Australian journalist and author. She is investigations editor at The Australian and host of the Sky News Australia program Sharri, which airs 8-9 PM Monday to Thursday. She is the winner of numerous awards in journalism, including two Walkley Awards.]

 

[42:32]

 

Thomas Sewell: The Right-wing jews in Australia are very connected obviously with the Liberal Party. And the Liberal Party has never been doing worse in the history of its existence in the Australian political spectrum.

 

So what’s happening in Australia in the last four or five years is the Liberal Party has gone from a serious contender at winning the 51% of the, not the primary vote, but the total vote. When you get all the preferencing schemes or the minor parties or the satellite parties all funnel all their votes into the Liberal Party so they can win the 51%. They went from a serious contender to that, to basically total party death. I mean the Liberal Party is on its way to becoming no longer being one of the big two. And Australian politics is fracturing on the Right.

 

And so the jews, the Zionist jews especially, are absolutely petrified that they’re losing that conservative Right, You know, the control, what’s it called? The gatekeeper. They’re losing their gate-keeping party. The “Containment Right”, sorry is the word I’m looking for. They’re losing control of the Containment Right.

 

And so the jews are shifting between One Nation which is the slightly more Right-wing party, led by a redhead lady called Pauline Hanson, who was fish and chip shop lady that said racist things about Asians and now she’s like the biggest judeophile in the country.

 

And so they’re shifting support towards One Nation and the Right-wing faction within the Liberal Party. And there is truth to the fact that the Labor Party has aided and abetted Hamas in the sense that the Labor Party gains a lot of its vote from the Muslim blocs and does everything it can to not upset the Muslims. And when this war in Palestine was going on, the Labor Party was in a very difficult situation because a lot of the people that make up the Labor Party are, … And also their main alliance, which is with the Greens, which is a very Left-wing party that’s very pro-Palestine. The Labor Party are caught between a rock and a hard place where they’re really pro-jewish but they kind of have to be anti-Israel. Similar to like the Jeremy Corbyns, …

 

Henrik Palgren: I was gonna say, it’s like UK. Even Sweden has that dynamic too with the Social Democrats. They’re extremely in with the Muslim faction and trying to bring them aboard and they’re kind of infiltrating the party and they are actually taking more power.

 

And so the kind of conservative opposition is therefore kind of forced to take an even more pro-stance. Even the Sweden, Democrats were like led into the fold of like being unofficial ties with Israel. They went to a trip over there recently and they were of course so happy about it. But just to reiterate that point. You are right that there’s a lot of people in America that don’t understand the Muslim dynamic, that they just think that Muslims are simply, … Has it been used like that? Of course! I mean, even opening the borders partially to Muslims. Right. Have been kind of a geostrategic demographic plan, if you will, right from the War on Terror with the neocons, which displaced a lot of these people. They used that as the excuse and now we have to let in Muslims.

 

So there’s a sure, there’s a functionality in that. Not every one, obviously, but some doesn’t seem to understand just how big of a problem that that is and that the Muslim organized community actually is. And they just think them as pawns of Mossad and Israeli interests essentially. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: And also the dynamic in Australia is very different to America. So in America you have predominantly a Mexican and an African problem.

 

And so you have whole suburbs taken over by Mexicans or you have whole suburbs taken over by Africans. We don’t have that in Australia. There’s no suburb in Australia that’s taken over by Mexicans and there’s very few suburbs, like there’s probably only two or three suburbs in Melbourne and maybe one or two suburbs in Sydney that are taken over by Africans. But what we do have is we have entire regions of our cities, like we’re talking 3, 4, 5, 6 suburbs at a time, taken over by Arabs. And we have huge Islamic, you know, voting blocks. We have huge Islamic organizations. The Muslims are very organized. Like I used to work in the northern suburbs just as a casual worker when I was doing the residential care. And there was a resi home in the northern suburbs and I was looking after some drug addict teenagers, and you know, taking them to play footy and stuff like that. And they were the only White kids in the whole area.

 

I mean, there was three mosques in that suburb. And I’m telling you there was probably 5,000 Muslims per mosque, all fighting age men, all fit, all healthy. It was an army. There was probably, there was like more than a division, more than a division, like a World War II size division, like probably 15,000 fighting Muslims in that one suburb.

 

And I mean, we’re talking about guys aged between 18 and 40 you know, on the steroids train at the kickboxing gym. You know, I mean, like when you talk about “tribe and train”, they were organized on another level! And so and they’re political, they’re religious, they’re not low IQ niggers running around shooting each other with guns. They’re much more intelligent. They’re probably like averaging a 95 IQ, which is in that zone where they can organize effectively in very large numbers. The Africans can’t do that. So, if there’s societal collapse, if there’s a breakdown, you’ve got potentially tens of thousands of Muslim fighters as a fifth column in your country, that’s a way bigger threat than just like the chaos and anarchy of a hundred thousand Africans just in this city.

 

So I think some Americans probably do understand it. They might live in particular areas and they might be observing what happens in Europe and our situation is closer to Europe than it is to America’s.

 

[48:41]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Right, exactly, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. With the added factor of the Chinese and the Indians. So yeah, they’re obviously less militant, but they’re equally as organized at an economic level.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, exactly! It’s a major problem. And they’re kind of there’s this alliance, as you said, between the, usually the Labor government, the Left-wing governments and the Muslim faction kind of thing.

 

So I’m very familiar with it now that’s played out in Sweden. It’s very detrimental and yeah, so basically it’s a multi-pronged attack. It’s Chinese, it’s Indians, it’s Muslims, it’s jews. It’s like everyone!

 

Thomas Sewell: Social cohesion. It’s social cohesion.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s what the so the government. I’ve never heard this word used so much in the last six months. It’s like they got the patch, like they got the software patch, they got the software update. Every media station, every politician on all sides, Liberal, Labor, all they talk about now is “social cohesion”. Every press conference, “social cohesion”.

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: Every arrest, social cohesion! Every law change they’re trying to make:

 

“We got to improve social cohesion!”

 

And you know when ASIO gets up on the TV, like Mike Burgess, when he gets up on the press releases:

 

“Social cohesion! Social cohesion! Social cohesion!”

 

It is the running meme of 2025 here in Australia is the government will not stop talking about social cohesion, which really is about public trust in the institutions, public trust in the government and the fact that we’re in a multipolar society, that guns or no guns, people are breaking away from each other and everyone is getting way more racist.

 

All people, all Whites, Indians, Muslims, Chinese people, we’re going into that mode where boundaries between suburbs are becoming more clear and White flight is becoming far more obvious. And, yeah, people are starting to stick to their own areas more, which in America you’ve probably had for a really long time. You’ve had probably that breakdown in social cohesion.

 

But here in Australia, we had this, like crazy salt and pepper multiculturalism where every suburb just had a light Dusting of high IQ, non-White people that we just stole from the Third World. But now we’ve got all the foot soldiers here. So now the social cohesion’s properly broken down now.

 

Henrik Palgren: Do you think they intend to actually use it in the way we use it, or did we have to integrate them, then better? Is that the kind of the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: No, they’re not even bothering with that’s the brilliant part of it. Their strategy is so ineffective, they’re not even bothering to talk about assimilation anymore. They gave up on assimilation about five years ago. I haven’t really heard that word used by any of the parties, except maybe One Nation. They’re probably the only one still trying to die on the hill of assimilation, which is good. I’m glad that there’s a controlled opposition in that area so that they can die on the hill of assimilation, because it won’t work.

 

Henrik Palgren: And that’s Pauline Hanson.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s Pauline Hanson.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So she’s gone from a pretty explicitly White nationalist position where it’s like her maiden speech, she said:

 

“Australia is being threatened by being flooded with Asians!”

 

And the whole mainstream media just mocked her. They didn’t argue against it. They just mocked her and said:

 

“That that’s insane! That’s ridiculous!”

 

And this is in 1996. And she was right. And now that she’s right, instead of doubling down on her position that Australia’s now flooded with Asians, she’s now got Asians and Indians in her party. And she’s saying:

 

“Oh, but these are assimilated. They’re assimilated Asians!”

 

And so she’s gone like, she’s doubling down on Civnattery and the assimilation method.

 

Whereas the Liberal Party and Labor Party. The Liberal Party has two factions. It has the Right-wing and Left-wing in it. So it’s meant to be a Right-wing party, but it’s actually been taken over by Left-wingers.

 

And I’m not just talking about the Overton Window shifting. It actually has had a coup, like an internal coup. And basically the Right-wing faction was more aligned with that One Nation rhetoric. Like they want to maintain the assimilation lie, whereas the Left-wing faction:

 

“No, that’s racist! You can’t say ‘assimilation’ because that implies that our culture is better than theirs. So they shouldn’t be assimilating into our culture.”

 

So that’s fucking awesome! That’s great news. I don’t want these people assimilating or attempting to assimilate.

 

Henrik Palgren: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: And the ones that have attempted are being outnumbered now by the ones that don’t even give a fuck and don’t have any respect for our culture and society. And so, yeah, social cohesion is at an all time low.

 

Yeah, that’s basically the situation in Australian politics. And now they’re calling for deportations, but they’re doing it in a very soft way. They basically want to try to just more of the same. They want to deport and block anti-semites coming in the country. And the rhetoric is not really around like anything like Donald Trump where he’s talking about people from shithole countries. That rhetoric is not on the menu here in Australia.

 

[53:42]

 

Henrik Palgren: Right. Yep. Nope. Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Pauline Hanson’s broached it a little bit, but nowhere at the same level.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So basically the Right-wing in the United States or Donald Trump, like the MAGA camp is more Right-wing than the party that’s broken away from. Not to sound too complicated, [chuckling] but like One Nation has basically tripled in size in the last couple of years because the Liberal Party, after there was a Left-wing coup in it, is just in shambles.

 

And so I guess this leads into the next point which is about building up our party and the kind of support that we’re seeing.

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly! No, I want to get into that. And guys, I’ll get to some of your chats and questions for Tom here too in a moment. I appreciate the support there too. We’ll get to that.

 

Just quick, regarding the gun there’s a couple of things in terms of the fallout here. I think you have the next election in 2028 and again, I’m not staring myself too blind on this, but it’s just an interesting dynamic in terms of like will the current government been able to push through then a couple of things when it comes to additional gun laws or maybe then restricting these, even these hunting license, you know, hunting licenses that they’re handing out right now! And what do you think will happen in regards to the hate this was one headline from GB News here:

 

“Racial Hatred laws must be tightened in the wake of Bondi beach massacre!”

 

So are these the two main things that the Labor Party will deal with, do you think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. So Jack Eltis, the state leader [of NSN] for New South Wales, put out a very good post recently where he basically explained that it’s sad that the government is going to take away more rights of freedoms or privileges of the Australian population, but it’s ultimately a net positive in the sense that Australians do need to get shocked into reality. They need to wake up from their slumber and realize that no matter what happens, good, bad, indifferent, the result it’s going to be mutated into taking away their rights. That there’s never going to be a solution to deporting all these Muslims. There’s never going to be a solution to stopping the level of crime. Any law that’s passed is just going to affect you. And that these laws are constantly just, yeah, mutated to affect White Australians when White Australians are not the cause of the problem.

 

So I know a lot about gun laws in Australia because I used to be really interested in it as a subject prior to really dedicating myself to White nationalism. Really there’s not much they can do, there’s not much the government can do except hot air. What they will do if they want some sort of nominal victory is they will ban all the niche firearms that aren’t bolt action.

 

So at the moment in Australia we’ve got a whole bunch of firearms that kind of circumvent the law in the sense that they aren’t actually bolt action rifles, but you can get them on a Cat B license, which anyone can get if you join a hunting club, which is what this young Arab, this young half Indian Muslim dude did. He just joined, I think the Zavasta Hunting Club, which is like Serbian hunting club. It’s just connected to the Serbian community. Not that they’ve got any implication in this. That must have been his local hunting club. He joined that club, therefore he gets access to a Cat B.

 

But he didn’t use a strictly bolt action rifle in the attack. He used a straight, what’s called a “straight pull”, which, Beretta make one, I think Ticker makes one. There’s a whole bunch of gun companies that make niche rifles, but they’re always very expensive. A bolt action rifle in Australia would cost somewhere between six hundred and twelve hundred dollars. Like a decent one, or a half decent one. The straight pulls are usually the more bougie end of the market. Like two and a half, $3,000. Three and a half thousand dollars. So rifles are very expensive in Australia.

 

And what they would do to get a nominal victory is they would change the law and say:

 

“Straight pulls, they’re rapid fire bolt actions, they’re too fast! And we can’t let people get them!”

 

So that means the next terror attack will be like 20% slower, right? Instead of 15 people being killed, maybe 14 or 13 people will be killed.

 

Henrik Palgren: So just send more cops and the amount of kills will be the same. Or more female cops.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, shit, one of the female cops almost killed just a random Arab on the bridge.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, of course, [chuckling] yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So the death toll almost got higher! You know, insert the Sam Hyde clip. Fuck!

 

Yeah, they scare me genuinely, especially when they’re at the door.

 

But yeah, I’ve had a male cop tackle me like with his gun out. And I wasn’t in fear at all! I was just like:

 

“I’m not resisting, I’m not resisting!”

 

Like, I was just chill.

 

But when I see a female cop with a gun out, I freak out! I’m like:

 

“This is it. Hail Odin! Like it’s over. [chuckling] Yeah, take me!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Take you to Valhalla? Yeah, if a female cop shoots you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The Valkyries have come to take me! Oh no. Because they’re just so scary, because they’re shaking and shit! Like they get the brief. Like:

 

“He’s a terrorist! He’s a maniac! Be on guard!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And you say that to a woman with a gun before they’re like kicking your door. And fuck! It’s like they’re on speed. Like their pupils are so dilated its scary.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh gosh!

 

Thomas Sewell: The look in their eyes is scary. Yeah, it’s like you can’t tell where they’re predator or prey. It’s a mixture of both. They’re prey with a gun. It’s crazy!

 

But anyway, I’ll stop with the “misogyny”, because it’s not the point of the stream.

 

[59:13]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Let’s have some more. [chuckling] Come on! Okay. Yeah. So you know, again you have the Port Arthur massacre.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know that definitely is very suspicious!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I mean, undoubtedly. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s questions and it’s not because one’s a Muslim and one’s not. It’s not about that. The Port Arthur massacre is extremely suspicious and there’s a lot of good docos that have been made on it. An associate, I wouldn’t say an associate that might get him in trouble, but someone I’ve actually met before in the alternative sort of political space a decade ago, a guy called Paul Moder*, he actually made a documentary called Wasp on the Port Arthur massacre. And he spent about 10 years researching the Port Arthur massacre. And yeah, I won’t go into detail because I don’t want to do a conspiracy stream today, but it’s very obvious that what they’re telling us about that situation is just not true.

 

[* Film director and actor Paul Moder has embarked on a cinematic retelling of the Port Arthur Massacre, which goes into full production 2019, under the title of WASP. But unlike the current wave of “true crime”, Moder attempts to unpick the official version of events and create a rare piece of Australian revisionist-history cinema. Well before it’s made, WASP is already very controversial, but it continues a lineage of pessimism and historical revisionism that started in late 1960s with films like Blow Up, Parallax View and reaching crescendo with Oliver Stone’s JFK in 1991. https:// www.pureshitauscinema.com/interviews/moder.html]

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. And then end result of that, a lot of the guns were, it was a buyback program. Right. That happened after.

 

Thomas Sewell: So it’s a bit misunderstood. Even in Australia, most people don’t really know what happened. So John Howard* [former Aust PM] passed laws saying you can’t own semi-autos anymore, again unless you’ve got this special Cat C, Cat D license, whereas you used to get all firearms all on the same license.

 

[* John Winston Howard (born 26 July 1939) is an Australian former politician who served as the 25th prime minister of Australia from 1996 to 2007, holding office as leader of the Liberal Party of Australia. His eleven-year tenure as prime minister is the second-longest in Australian history, after that of Sir Robert Menzies. Since the death of Bob Hawke in 2019, Howard is the oldest living Australian former prime minister. Howard was born in Sydney and studied law at the University of Sydney. He was a commercial lawyer before entering Parliament.]

 

And I think some states, they didn’t even have licenses. I’ve heard stories of people, they could go into Kmart and buy a gun and like just buy it off the shelf and just take it on the train and go home with it. I’ve actually spoken to people in person that have said that they used to be able to, when they’re 18, they could walk down to the sports shop and buy a gun, get on a train, take the gun home on the train. No one would even blink an eye. And that was the Australia they grew up in. So some really similar to how America used to be. But after Port Arthur they changed the law so you can’t have semi-autos and they Instituted more licensing sort of schematics.

 

But what they did was they did it, they did a buyback program, but the stats of it are not publicly known. They’re publicly available, but they only got about 700,000 rifles in that first year. Obviously they got a few more later on, but they only got back about 700,000 rifles.

 

And I think 4% of the rifles they got back in the buyback were semi-autos. And to put that into context, 600,000 SKS is, were imported into the country in 1995 and 1996. So the year that the gun buyback happened, more SKS came into the country than SKS were handed over.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: Really any rifle that was handed over, almost.

 

So yeah, there’s a lot of law in this country about, there’s a whole generation of guys in their 70s and 80s that have all just got like crates of SKS is buried on their farms. Now, I’ve personally never seen it, I’ve never witnessed it, never touched one, never heard of one. They all got lost in fishing trips as far as, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Tragic boating accident!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, tragic boating accidents. I got no knowledge of anything like of the sort! But there’s a lot of like folklore about those hundreds of thousands of SKS that came in the country in 1996. As I said, only 4% of the 700,000 rifles that were handed back were semi-autos. And actually they’re not SKSs. They were actually SKKs.

 

So they’re like a Chinese SKS that could take AK magazines. And very occasionally there’ll be a shooting between like bikies and the cops. And you’ll see it’s full automatic fire coming out of one of these SKKs, shooting the helicopters or something crazy like that.

 

Henrik Palgren: So.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but again that’s all very old, like, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, right.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll be in the Cosmoline oil* or whatever in the crates in the ground and 99% of them be forgotten about if the bikies don’t get their hands on them. But the Arabs actually have AKs and Glocks, all these like organized crime groups. There’s a whole shipment of Glocks that went missing years ago.

 

[* Cosmoline is the genericized trademark for a common class of brown, wax-like petroleum-based corrosion inhibitors, typically conforming to United States, Military Standard MIL-C-11796C Class 3. They are viscous when freshly applied, have a slight fluorescence, and solidify over time with exposure to air. The main ingredient in cosmoline is aliphatic petroleum solvent, which is volatile and evaporates over time.]

 

There’s been two terrorist attacks on Australian soil in the past by Africans of all things. And they got AKs from the local mosque. So there’s a huge amount of illegal firearms to that have been imported in the country since 1996 that the Arabs and Muslims have control over. Because they’re involved with organized crime.

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: They control the vast majority of organized crime in Australia, similar to Sweden.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep, that’s right. Exactly! Yeah. Guns came in. I figured it’d be a little bit more complicated with Australia being an island as opposed to the EU. You can basically just drive in with them from like some Balkan country or something.

 

[1:03:51]

 

Thomas Sewell: But they get them in the same way they get drugs and they just get them in on shipping container. If a whole bunch get caught, they don’t care. They can bring in a thousand at a time.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, they’re the arming themselves and they’re being allowed to also. Yeah, I mean, let’s be honest. It’s a feature and not a bug, I think, to be honest.

 

Okay, so the next thing that we’re going. Yeah, okay, so Hate Speech laws. Anything else you want to say about that? What do you think? So they banned the swastika and the roman, you know, things like this. What’s next here? What do you think you’re looking at?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll just be more funding to this new task force they’ve built, the AFP, Australian Federal Police, which is basically trying to convert itself into the FBI.

 

So the Federal Police, my understanding of the Federal Police for the last couple decades has really focused on organized crime, has focused on importing and shipping like drugs into the country or guns into the country. It’s been focused on white-collar crime as well.

 

So really big frauders, really big scammers, kind of Wall Street crime, white-collar crime, people stealing money that work at banks. I know there was some young guys that got done with some sort of banking fraud scheme. And that’s all AFP. The state police don’t handle a lot of that. More expertise crime. That’s really what the feds have been doing for a long time. And what they’re converting the Federal Police into is. And it’s very clever the way the government do it. They basically have control of the budget. And so they’ll say:

 

“Hey, we’re giving this much money to the Federal Police. Oh you’ve got less funding now. You’ve got to shut down some of your departments.”

 

And so they shut down these departments and then like they do the budget and then the next year they go:

 

“Oh, actually you’re getting 500 million more than last year!”

 

And then it’s like:

 

“Oh, and here are the new departments that we recommend you set up.”

 

So there’s an article that came out today. So when the ASIO director general, Mike Burgess*, came into position in charge of ASIO, back in 2019, they fired 10 of the most senior, kind of staff of ASIO, And they would have done the same thing. They would have said:

 

“Oh, we don’t have money. You know, we’re too top heavy. We’re too top heavy! It’s a boys club at the top and they’re all on a good salary and we got to save money. We’re too top heavy!”

 

[* Michael Paul Burgess is an Australian intelligence official, and the current Director-General of Security in charge of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO). Prior to his appointment to this role on 16 September 2019, Burgess was director-general of the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). Burgess was born in England, and immigrated to Adelaide, South Australia in 1973 at the age of seven. He was the first member of his family to study in higher education, receiving a degree in electrical engineering from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988.]

 

That’s what they’re doing. They’re trying to do that with defense at the moment. But really it’s always a coup. And it’s known in the Australian inner circle as being “The Red Wedding”. That’s what they called it. It’s like the Red Wedding where they basically couped and they killed off, they retired, they forced retired like 10 of the most senior counter terrorist experts at ASIO. That were probably like racist Right-wingers that were like they’re the post 9/11 intelligence people* that are like:

 

“Yep, let’s catch these Muslims!”

 

And they got rid of those guys. And that was around the time this Bondi shooter was being investigated by ASIO, So what you have is then you had the Brennan Tarrant incident [in New Zealand] happen. You had the top 10 senior staff of ASIO getting fired.

 

[* Who would well know that 9/11 was a ZOG false flag engineered from Israel. See ALSO LINKS below.]

 

And then you have the new funding come in after they’re getting fired. And that new funding came in, and 40% of their budget now is Right-wing extremism. And the budget for these state police forces, Federal Police forces and ASIO varies anywhere from 40 to 70% of their budget of their task force, of their manpower. Really, that’s what it means, is dedicated to anti-semitism from the Right-wing perspective, as opposed to from the Muslim perspective or just terrorism from a Right-wing perspective, as a set of terrorism from a Muslim perspective.

 

And so what we would be looking at is more funding to these task force. So that would mean more offices, that would mean a bigger budget, that would mean more raids, that would mean more intimidation, that would mean more charges are going to get laid.

 

And so it just means that people just got to be more, I guess, sensitive with their rhetoric. There are things that I have said in the past, back in 2018, 2019, that I, after those reforms came in, there’s no way I would say them in 2022, 2023.

 

And likewise, there are things that I’ve said online, 2023 that I just simply would not say today. And it’s not because I’m a, it’s not because I’m fucking optics cucking and:

 

“Oh, I’m a moderate now. Now we’ve got mainstream coverage and we’re a household name now I’m changing my rhetoric and betraying my base!”

 

It’s like, no, it’s just that I don’t want to go to jail for two years for fucking saying the wrong thing on the Internet. I’m okay with going to jail for a couple months for punching people in the head. That’s cool. But I’m not okay with going to jail for two, … Like what’s happening to Joel [Davis] right now? I mean, what did he say? “Rhetorical rape”?

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s crazy! And he’s done like two months now, so he’s done almost as much time, … He’s got a bailout coming up on the 23rd, so that’ll be what, a month in jail or more? It’d be almost six weeks in jail!

 

Henrik Palgren: Have you spoken to him recently?

 

[1:08:45]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I haven’t because he has to call me. So it takes a long time to get names and numbers added to the callers. So I haven’t received a phone call from him unfortunately. But I expect one soon. But I’ve spoken obviously with the lawyer and there’s obviously confidentiality so he can’t go into detail, but he can pass on regards and tell me about his general well being.

 

So yeah, I have spoken to people that have spoken to him. But yeah, he seems to be doing okay. He’s just frustrated. And as you would be.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, he missed his birth of his son, I believe.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. His first child.

 

Henrik Palgren: And they’ve been going after his girlfriend as well. Some headlines out, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Henrik Palgren: Are you in contact with anyone else around him and how they’re dealing with it, the situation?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, my missus and his missus are in contact. Obviously she needs a bit of space with everything that’s going on. But you know, she’s reached out and yeah, we’re in contact with her. She’s got a little bit of support in Sydney from some of the partners over there and also her family are quite supportive.

 

So yeah, it’s disgusting that that journalist that went and harassed her. I think it was like two or three days after she gave birth where she’s putting nappies in the bin and they’ve got a private investigator out the front taking photos of her. That same journalist came to my family, my in law’s house and twisted words that my family said through a fly screen door.

 

And they also went to Matthew Gruter’s house as well and Matthew Gruter’s wife had just given birth as well. I think they had a two week old baby. And yeah, when they went to my family, my in-laws house, we’ve got a brand new baby as well. Like we’re not brand new but like a six month old baby and a toddler. And they’re attacking, they’re coming after the women, they’re coming after our wives and you know, it’s obviously abhorrent. But and it’s radicalizing, it’s really radicalizing. You know the expression:

 

“You don’t hate journalists enough!”

 

And this is a classic example of it. Like imagine the mentality that a journalist would have to go:

 

“Oh, this woman’s just given birth.”

 

Because they know, they know the details because it was mentioned in court that she was due within a week. And so imagine going:

 

“Oh, she’s due within a week. Let’s cause as much stress and harm and cortisol to her as possible!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And put her in the news and put her in the media either while she’s just about to have birth or give birth or she’s just had the process.

 

And anyone that knows anything about childbirth, labor, postpartum, they know that that’s the most absolutely critical time for a woman to balance her hormones and to not have any unnecessary stress. It’s when they need the most amount of sort of oxytocin. They just need love, they need cuddles. Like usual, but on another level, women need just cuddles in general.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: But they really just need cuddles and support before, during and after that whole process. And these journalists would know that they would know that. She’s a woman, she would know that. But these people are evil and they’re possessed by demons and the demons attack the vulnerable. They attack the weak and the vulnerable and they attack women. They attack women when they’re at their most vulnerable. I mean my missus didn’t get attacked like any day of the week while I wasn’t in jail. But she’s getting harassed and attacked by journalists when I’m in jail. So when she’s alone. So they come after you when you’re alone. They come after you when you’re vulnerable. They come after you when you’ve just given birth, you can barely walk because, you’re still recovering.

 

I mean, yeah. What we’re going to do to these journalists when we take power in a legal and lawful manner is going to be like, I’ve got experience with how the system has treated me over the years for being a political dissident. And yeah, these people are really silly! Like the way they’re behaving, they don’t know who they’re messing with. They just don’t know who they’re messing with! They don’t realize that we have really long memories and we are never going to forgive them! Ever! So keep going, see what happens! I mean they may as well keep doubling down because they’re already going to get the worst! [chuckling] Like the worst thing I can think of is what’s going to happen to these journalists, to do this to Joel’s missus and by default to Joel. But Joel’s fine, he’ll be right. But to do this to his partner is just disgusting!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, media has always been a fifth column, right? Always an operative for the state, an additional element or something that you can use in your war, in your effort to target someone who is an undesirable to the system, essentially. Right.

 

So yeah, it’s absolutely disgusting!

 

Okay, so yes, tell us and then we’ll get to some questions here too, guys. We appreciate you get a bunch of questions to get to, and comments.

 

But yeah, the party then. So tell us about how these ideas formulated and the fact that you were at a point here, like the legal process in Australia makes it fairly easy as far as I understand it. And I’m sure there’s hoops you have to jump through as always. But in terms of actually registering it and even the possibility of getting a seat in a county, I’m not sure if you call a county down there, but explain this to us a little bit.

 

[1:14:22]

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay. Well, from the start, Australia has two houses. It has what’s called an Upper House and a Lower House. Our Upper House is a Senate and you get elected based off the, a larger, … How to explain it?

 

So you can get Senators in quite easily if you broadly get a vote across the state. So even though it’s a federal election, you might only need somewhere between 1 and 10% of the state to vote for you. And again, it’s not a straightforward, it’s not an exact percentage that you need. Some people get 7% of the vote and they don’t get a Senator. Some people get 2% of the vote and they get a Senator. It’s all about preferencing schemes and deals and there’s a lot of dodgy stuff that goes on in the Australian system, which should all be eradicated, but we just have to work with what we’ve got.

 

But if you get say 10% of the vote, you’re almost guaranteed to get a Senate seat, and that’s 10% of the vote, regardless of where they are living in that state. And then each state, I think has, I don’t know, I think there’s like 49. No, there’d be more than 49. I think it’s 75 Senators in total, something like that. And they’re spread out across the state at a federal level.

 

But then you have the Lower House, which are called MPs or it’s the House of Representatives and you have to actually win the majority of the vote within what you would call a county. We call it an electorate.

 

And so the state is broken down into say, I think 49 electorates and or it actually depends. I think it’s 120,000 people per electorate, roughly. Some are 100,000, some 140,000, but roughly it’s 120,000 people or 120,000 voters, one or the other. And you have to win 51% or 50.1% of the vote to get that seat. Now you don’t have to win 50% of the primary vote, you have to do these preferencing schemes with all these other parties, because we’re not a two party system like in America where it’s Republican or Democrat. The Labor Party might get 34% of the vote, then the Green Party might get 8% of the vote, that makes 42. And then as long as their coalition is bigger than the coalition of the Liberals, then they get the seat.

 

So there’s like, I don’t know, 200 MPs across the country and 75 Senators, something like that, or those aren’t exact numbers. Just go on Wikipedia and you can find out exactly! But what’s important to know is that we have these two different houses. Kind of like how you’ve got Congressmen and Senators and kind of like how in the UK they’ve got the House of Lords and then they’ve got the ministers, or, sorry, not the ministers, the MPs.

 

So we have MPs and we have Senators and they’re different, they’re elected on different bases. Now we’re not really going to contest the Lower House. Even though there’s more seats available, those seats are much harder to get because you need to actually be the dominant political force in that area, which if you’re not in the major parties, is almost impossible.

 

For example, the Green Party in Australia is the third biggest party in Australia and they have 11 Senators or 10 Senators. And I think they only have one MP. And that could have been from a defection. I don’t know if actually. No, it might have been an actual victory in the Lower House.

 

So that’s basically all the MP seats are controlled by the Liberal Party and Labor Party, the two big parties. They’ve got like a monopoly on the Lower House, duopoly, or jewopoly.

 

And then the Senate is actually more diverse. It’s got all the micro parties in it. It’s got One Nation’s got four or five seats. The Greens have got 10 seats. There’s all these niche parties with one or two seats. So they have a lot more power in the Senate. And how that works is the Lower House passes bills. So they’ll say we want to introduce new legislation or we want to introduce new laws. And they’ll draft it up, they’ll write it up. They have to make their deals in the Lower House to get the Bill to pass through the Lower House, which is where the Prime Minister is. We don’t have a president. So the Prime Minister doesn’t have any executive power at passing bills. His executive powers come from his cabinet.

 

So it’s more about the management of the country. That’s where his power comes from. He can’t manage the Lower House. He’s just the Prime Minister. He’s the prime speaker in the Lower House. He doesn’t have like, I don’t believe he has any veto ability. If he does, someone in the chat correct me, but I don’t believe the Prime Minister has any vetoing ability. There’s all sorts of niche crazy laws. Because we’ve got like the British Parliament system, we’re basically operating a British Parliament that’s slightly modified. So there’s a Speaker of the House and there’s a Leader of the House, all sorts of stuff going on.

 

But the general rule is that once the Bill passes through the Lower House, it then has to go to the Upper House, which is the Senators, and then has to be passed through the Upper House as well.

 

So if we can get guys in the Senate, we can block bills that are bad for White Australians and we can agree to bills that are good for White Australians. And we can quite easily in the next one or three between one and three election cycles. So between three to nine years from now, we can quite easily, quite easily, hold the balance in the Senate!

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting!

 

Thomas Sewell: So what that, what that would mean is we might only need five seats in the Senate and we could quite easily swing, … A lot of these bills. They can be swung by one or two votes in the Senate. So it might pass easily through the Lower House, but then it gets the Senate, it won’t get through the Senate. So we can block some bad stuff coming through. And obviously that can then tie in with our general political strategy.

 

Obviously, we don’t believe that there’s a pure Parliamentary solution. Obviously, we’re working in so many different ways to build parallel society and parallel function in this country.

 

And obviously the meta-political shift and the cultural shift that we’re trying to make, which is our primary concern is getting Australians to identify as White people. The problem is that they don’t identify as White people. Well, they’re starting to. And that’s where we’re seeing our success, is they’re starting to identify as White people again, which is how it was. And we need to get back.

 

And what we’re seeing with this Bondi thing, for example, is for the first time ever, in the “most successful multicultural” country in the world, we’re seeing actually a lot of mainstream criticizm of multiculturalism. So multiculturalism is like the golden calf in Australia. They worship it. They absolutely worship it! Multiculturalism is the replacement to the White Australia Policy.

 

So for the first, no one’s allowed to criticize multiculturalism. If you criticize it, you have to criticize it in a way that:

 

“Oh, they’re not assimilating enough! Of course I support multiculturalism, but I just want a better version of multiculturalism.”

 

You know, I mean that’s the only way that people really criticize multiculturalism in Parliament, within the political realm. But what we’re finally seeing now is genuine criticizm and a grassroots dislike of multiculturalism in Australia. But there’s not one political party that’s against multiculturalism. We’re the only one.

 

So can we get 5% of the vote? Can we get 10? Can we get 20? Can we get 30? I don’t know. I don’t have the answer to that at this stage. Time will tell, and we’ll see how bad the country gets and how radical and how racialized politics becomes. But we are succeeding in what we’re doing. We have about double the amount of people that are signed up to support us. However, only half of those people are signed up to actually go on the registrar, which is a private form with the AEC. It’s not the government. The AEC is a third party that is obviously a government institution, but it’s a unique third party that has never leaked data of membership lists.

 

Henrik Palgren: So this would be the first! No, I’m just joking! Because it would, …

 

[1:22:10]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: It would be the first time. Well, how they doxed the One Nation list back in 1998 or 1999, but they didn’t dox it from the AEC. The AEC didn’t have a breach of privacy. They’re a professional institution. They’re civn ats mostly, but they’re professional institution, and they’re a patriotic institution in that sense. But the way that the list of One Nation members got leaked was by jews in the party. Jews in the party leaked it!

 

So they had, there were jews in the party that had access to the list and they leaked it to their friends that didn’t like the party. Whereas we don’t have any jews in our party.

 

Henrik Palgren: First time in history!

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s only about four people in the organization. Maybe a fifth. Yeah, there’s four or five people that have access to the list. I am one of them, obviously.

 

But yeah, it’s held in the absolute tightest of circles. There’s some state leaders that don’t even have access to the list. If they asked for it, we would give it to them. I would let any state leader see the list.

 

But yeah, it’s a very, it’s a secret document. I mean, ASIO would probably be able to see the list because they could probably hack into our computers. But look, what are they going to do with it? What are ASIO going to do with it?

 

Henrik Palgren: No, sure. No, I get the point. I’m just saying, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The fact is there’s 3400 people on the list, so I wouldn’t be concerned. So there’s some Australians:

 

“I don’t want to sign up to the party because then ASIO is going to know I exist!”

 

It’s like, look, you’re probably already on a list from being racist on Facebook and liking The Noticer. You know [chuckling] what I mean?

 

Like if you follow particular pages on Facebook, you’re probably already on their list. I guess you would just be on a maybe a different list.

 

But again, I’ve said this for years. It’s strength in numbers. It’s strength in numbers. And we share the risk. We share the risk. When there’s 10,000 names on the list, which maybe in a year or two there will be, what matters? Why does it matter if you’re one of ten thousand? I mean, if you’re one of ten thousand, what’s going to happen to you? The police, I mean, how much resources they’re going to have to harass? The way the police harass us is they prioritize who’s most important to harass. So they harass the leadership. 90% of our membership have never been harassed by the police. They’ve had no issues with the police.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I mean, that’s membership of our activist core. I’m not talking about membership of the party. I’m saying 90% of our activists because we’re so big now, the vast majority have never even been tested. So only the kind of guys that have been around four or five years have really any experience with repeated harassment from the police.

 

So, yeah, I would say that’s the party website. Well, that’s the org website. Obviously, the party is a part of the org. We’re looking at putting forward our four big policies in January next year.

 

[1:24:54]

 

So we just had a series of seminars where we covered our four policies. They’re not on the website yet. I’ve copped a little bit of criticizm for that, but it will be up on the website soon. We’re just polishing them. We had a seminar last weekend across all the States except New South Wales because they’re preparing for nationals. Where we covered, we had one speaker per policy. And the four policies are simple.

 

We want the White Australia Policy to be reinstated, meaning we don’t want Australia to be a multicultural country anymore, we don’t want it to be a multiracial country anymore. And we want to start reversing the demographic avalanche of White people and start going back the other way and making Australia more White. And with the ultimate goal of making it entirely White.

 

And obviously that is going to involve a combination of mass deportations and also re-migration strategies. So we’d be looking at changing a whole number of laws. Is that going to happen anytime soon? No, but what we can do is start moving things in the right direction by taking a little bit of state control. So our biggest priority is protecting our demographics.

 

And so if we can protect the demographics of this country then all the other sort of Weimar conditions are fixable. You know, demographics are well not permanent. But demographics are destiny obviously. And that’s really our priority as a party. That’s why it’s policy number one is just protecting White Australia, protecting our demographics. And not just protecting it, but advancing our demographics. So we’ve gone from 99% White to about 66% White or 67% White in a period of around 50 years. So what we want to look at doing over the next 50 years or less, ideally a lot less, ideally over the next 10 years. But I’m realistic, it might take a bit more than 10 years. We want to look at going back up towards 99% and beyond.

 

Policy number two is called “End Debt Slavery”. So we’re going to ban obviously in the same principle as the White Australia Policy, the first principle of End Debt Slavery is we’re going to ban interest on family home loans.

 

So we’re going to guarantee every single Australian family an interest free home loan. They’ll get money lent to them by the State bank. So we’re going to take back the state bank.

 

So we had a state bank in Australia called the Commonwealth Bank. It’s since been privatized in 1996 and it’s worth, I don’t know, something like $1.3 trillion. And we’re going to take back ownership of the state bank and we’re going to use the state bank, the Commonwealth bank, to lend money to young families that are married, that are White Australians and they’re going to get interest free loans to buy houses.

 

And that’s how we’re going to fix the housing crisis is we’re going to deport millions of non-Whites which is going to massively free up the market. And then White Australians that want to buy a home or White Australians that currently have a home, all the interest is going to be wiped off the principal. So any new loan will be no interest. And any current loan, not only will you not pay interest going forward, but also any interest you have paid is going to be refunded to you off your principal.

 

So a lot of people are going to have their homes basically instantly paid off because most people have already paid more than their homes worth in interest. If they’re like Gen-X’s for example, if they’re more in the older sort of family bracket, they’ve got teenage kids and stuff, a lot of these people have already paid off their homes in interest alone. So that’s policy number two.

 

Policy number three is we’re going to do something called a “New Magna Carta”, or a Bill of Rights. We’re going to create an Australian Bill of Rights. Australia doesn’t have a Bill of Rights. So policy three is we’re going to introduce a series of rights and duties, a series of freedoms that we think are fundamental to being Australian and members of Western civilization, members of the White race. And we’re going to introduce these things in order to curtail the ever increasing Police State we live in and the powers of the tyranny of the government. So we want to reduce government power and increase citizen power.

 

So that’s things like a First Amendment. So like free speech, we don’t have that in our constitution. We have an implied right and that’s not good enough, because it’s being twisted and turned. We need to have a really explicit principle so that we get rid of all this hate speech legislation and all this religious vilification legislation. We want to get rid of all of that and give Australians the right to freedom of speech. And the right to criticize the government, even criticize us as much as we’re, you know, authoritarians, we’ll cop fair criticizm, obviously.

 

Other principles include, we want to do like a maximum 10% income tax. We want to include gun rights, but we’re going to be very tactful for how we include gun rights. So I want to do the Swiss model personally. I’m flexible and I’m open minded to how we could implement a Second Amendment in Australia.

 

[1:29:48]

 

Bu I want to do it in the Swiss model. Meaning you would do a national service at a high school. You would get issued a firearm during your national service and then you would retain that military style semi-automatic rifle or fully automatic rifle, but you would maintain that rifle as you would never be a civilian again. You would do your national service and that would make you a citizen. Kind of Starship Troopers kind of Fascism 101.

 

But it’s also just Athenian. It’s an Athenian model. It’s actually the foundation of democracy in some ways, the citizen soldier.

 

So that’s how we would look at implementing it. It wouldn’t be a strict Second Amendment the way you guys have it in Australia [America], because we need a lot of cultural change. We need, I think a few generations or at least one generation to breathe. To fix a lot of these issues. We don’t want to just have like guns galore just overnight without those kind of cultural changes.

 

And then policy four is re-industrialization. So that’s pretty simple. It’s really about taking back our infrastructure. Australia being an economic powerhouse again. Not just getting stripped of all its natural resources and being sent off to the developing world. We want to build all of our stuff here again. We want to build cars here again. We want to build ships here again. We’re an island. We should have a massive shipping capacity. We’re so reliant on trade. We should be a naval superpower. We should be we’re already a resource superpower. We have all the raw materials to do it. We need to re-industrialize.

 

We need to invest, take control of the RBA, the Reserve Bank of Australia, take control of the Commonwealth bank and do some serious, serious economy building in a completely different direction using high tech manufacturing and reclaim our economic autarky, or at least a large percentage of it.

 

So those are the four policies that’s what we’re putting forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of things mixed in amongst that you know, people talk about education Reform and you know, getting rid of multiculturalism will do a lot of what we want for education reform.

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s a lot to take in. No, obviously everyone needs to visualize that.

 

So the website, we’re going to have nice little graphics made up and there’ll be a little write up of each policy. And when you check the website out at some point, either late, probably not late January, probably February, but the policies will be announced soon. And I assume the website will be very neat and tidy by February with the policies.

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good. Nice. Holden, was that the car the Australia used to produce?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] right. Yeah, we made Fords as well. Fords and Holden, Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Like a version of Ford Australia, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Kind of yeah. And Holden’s just General Motors.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, okay, I see. Did you have any like native cars that you actually like?

 

Thomas Sewell: Holden is the native brand that was eventually owned by General Motors.

 

Henrik Palgren: We’re gonna have an Aryan future Tom. They’re gonna be flying cars. Okay!

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, there’s gonna be all. Look, I’m not gonna go too much into policy four because it’s a bottomless pit of what we can do.

 

Henrik Palgren: Powered by vril!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna do the craziest shit! We’re gonna do stuff no one’s ever seen before. We’re gonna terraform Australia. We’re gonna actually terraform it.

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna do crazy shit! We’re gonna do inland lake, high speed rail, flying cars, …

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s the spirit! That’s the spirit right there!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s gonna be vriltastic!

 

Henrik Palgren: Vriltastic. I just want to play this.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna give Australia a sense of purpose again. It’s not just about race and it’s not removing the slavery.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: White Australians without debt or without interest still have a demoralized attitude. What we’re trying to do is raise that spirit. It’s about a spiritual revival.

 

And I think part of that, because I’m not too big at talking about economics, although I’ve studied it a fair bit in my own time, but where economics is important is that most people, 99% of men need to go to work Monday to Friday. They need to. It’s a big part of their identity. It’s a big part of their purpose. And where most White men are lacking in purpose is not just from a racial perspective and not just from a demoralization in terms of the culture and the media and the movies they’re watching and the music they’re listening to. And the way that they’re being completely subverted at an economic level. It’s also when they go to work, what are they doing? Like, I worked in the construction industry for about five years, almost six years. And you go to work and you’re building what we call Jeet boxes. A Jeet box is these fucking shitty little townhouses with like all these different multi-roofs on them. They’re just the dumb. This is the dumbest fucking architecture style you ever see in your life! It’s the most ineffective, inefficient way to build a house you could possibly imagine. And it’s a dog box with no room on it, no backyard. The roofs are all touching each other, so they’re a separate dwelling, but not really. And it’s just so demoralizing just putting a roof on something like that. It just feels disgusting!

 

And then one day a month, you get a contract, or a cashy or something, and it’s some guy on a farm and he’s got 200 acres and he needs a new roof on his shed. And you go out, you drive an extra hour and a half to go to this guy’s farm. And you put the roof on the shed and you have a beer with the boys afterwards. And you just look at each other and you just say:

 

“What if every day was like this? What if every day was like this? Like, how good did today feel?”

 

Like the weather could have been awful! It doesn’t matter. And it just feels so good to just be on some land and just to build something and then and you can have a relationship with the guy you’re building it for. Like the farmer comes out of his house, he’s like:

 

“How you going boys? You know, you wanna iced coffee or something? I’ll get the Mrs to make you one.”

 

And like you, after work you can sit back and you can chat a bit and then you get in the car and you drive home.

 

[1:36:24]

 

 

But when you’re in these jeet boxes, like the dust and the muck and Indians are coming out of their house next to you and oh, it’s just so demoralizing. It’s just, why am I doing this? Why am I building this disgusting, ugly, grotty filth for these people to just replace me? So we want to bring back the Australian dream. Not just in the:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a nice house and I’ve got a nice backyard and I’ve got a golden retriever and a white picket fence.”

 

It’s not just about getting it back in that sense. It’s, well, what are you doing to get it? So we want to completely revolutionize the economy in a way that people actually feel a sense of pride, going to work again. Which I think Australians and Americans and Europeans, they probably had that 50 years ago.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, I think you’re right. Absolutely! Yeah. I wanted to play this clip here and I’m going to take some of the comments and questions from the audience watching here. But Robert Menzies, he was the 12th Prime Minister of Australia. He served from 1939-41 and then his second term from 46. Was that all the way to his retirement in 1966? Did he serve that long? Do you remember? Was that long? Or it must have been interrupted.

 

Anyway, it doesn’t matter. I want to play a clip with him. That’s the point on the White Australia Policy. Right. So listen to this here. I’m sure you’ve seen the clip, but let’s play it for the audience here.

 

Stewart Lamb: Do you believe that the White, the so-called “White Australia” policy will always be a stumbling block?

 

Sir Robert Menzies: I don’t think it’s such a stumbling block as people pretend, but that it’s important for us, I haven’t the slightest doubt!

Stewart Lamb: That we should maintain it the way it is?

Sir Robert Menzies: As long as we possibly can we ought to aim at having a homogeneous population!

I don’t want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa, or in America, or increasingly in Great Britain. I think it’s been a very good policy and it’s been of great value to us.

And most of the criticizm of it that I’ve ever heard doesn’t come from these oriental countries. It comes from (((wandering Australians))).

Stewart Lamb: For these views of course, in the past, Sir Robert, you have been described as a racist.

Sir Robert Menzies: Have I?

Stewart Lamb: I have read this, yes.

Sir Robert Menzies: Well, if I were not described as a racist, I’d be the only public man who hasn’t been! That’s one of these jargons, isn’t it? One of these modern words, you call a man a “racist”.

 

[END]

 

All right, what do you make of that? That’s how it used to be. Right? So this was like an idea. This is what I’m saying. What you’re proposing here is not some new radical thing. This is just basically going back to what the intention of the country was to begin with and the people running it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I really. A little bit of a red herring, but I really like the way he describes jews as “wandering Australians”.

 

Henrik Palgren: I figured that’s what it was! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. That was a dog whistle back in the day. Yeah. You know:

 

“We don’t get this kind of criticizm from the Orientals. We get this kind of criticizm from the wandering Australians.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Same thing as Nixon, because this is around the same time as Nixon. This is where you’ve got the conservative Right in power and back in the 60s, and they’re starting to realize that the jewish problem is what’s trying to destroy the nation. And it’s very clear from day dot that the jewish community here in Australia and obviously in America and Britain have been working fervently hard to dismantle the homogeneous White population and turn it into Babylon, so that they can hide in the mess that they make and they can hide their crimes. And yeah, as you said, that is how Australia was.

 

Another thing that’s interesting is how much the accent has changed. I obviously don’t have a pure Australian accent. I’m referred to a lot as a South African, but I’m actually not a South African. I have extended family in South Africa, but my accent is because my parents are both English.

 

So you can actually tell from these old politicians. Australians actually spoke with more of an English accent. They were more connected to the mother country in that sense. And the accent has definitely degraded, I think. And it’s more, it’s too ocka now. It’s become more and more uncouth. I know that I can’t really talk much. Also there was an increase of, there was just so much English immigration into Australia. So that would have maintained the properness of the English accent.

 

[1:40:08]

 

But yeah, what can you say about that? What I see as a statesman, we used to have statesmen in charge of the country. If I was living in 1966, would I have agreed with Menzies? Probably not. There probably would have been someone more racist than Menzies. I probably would have been like:

 

“Menzies a cuck!”

 

Or whatever [chuckling] the 1966 version of that was. Like:

 

“Menzies is too soft on the (((wandering Australian))). We need a, we need a more strict approach to the wandering Australian question!”

 

But yeah, it’s definitely obvious that Canada, Australia, even America to a large degree. There’s a lot of infrastructure, sort of rhetorical infrastructure in the founding of our nations. And you can find it.

 

I mean, I did a speech, a 45 minute speech on the weekend and I mentioned in the speech I had a legal friend who’s looked through the Constitution very thoroughly. The founding father of Australia or the first prime minister of Australia, Edmund Barton. Someone was arguing with him while they were drafting the Constitution in 1898. So it came out in 1901, but they spent about three years drafting it. And in 1898 he had an argument with another politician and they were asking about:

 

“Why have you put this race, this specific race power law in?”

 

And the first Prime Minister of Australia said:

 

“Basically we need a race power law because we need to be able to mass deport non-Whites when we don’t want them.”

 

And he didn’t even use the term “non-Whites”. He basically said:

 

“Inferior people and races, inferior and colored races. We should be able to deport them as a whole, when we don’t need them.”

 

So like if we need them to pick sugarcane, for example, like the way that you had blacks picking cotton, we had Pacific Islanders picking sugarcane in Queensland. The idea was before Federation we had, I can’t remember what they call them. “Coolies” [refers to Chinese workers], I think, or Kanakas*, I think they had a slur for them.

 

[* Plantation owners in Queensland had experienced difficulty in hiring laborers for their plantations, especially for the pay rates that were being offered. It was said that this situation was hindering the economic viability of those rural businesses. Many pastoralists had used convicts as laborers, but when the transportation of convicts to New South Wales ended in 1840, this meant that the plantation owners lost a major source of cheap labor. The lack of cheap labor for cotton and sugar plantations in Queensland led to the advent of Kanaka immigration. Kanakas (as laborers from the Pacific Islands were called) were imported in large numbers to work in Australia (especially in Queensland, but also in northern New South Wales). The term “Kanaka” means “man” or “person” in the Hawaiian language. Souce: Https:// www. Australianculture.org/the-white-Australia-policy-kanakas /]

 

But they had these Pacific islanders come in and pick sugarcane and they wanted to make sure there was legislation that if they brought in a thousand of them, they picked the sugar cane and then they could force them on a boat to go home when it was done, so that they could keep Australia White. And he won the argument and they put it in the Constitution. So in the Australian constitution, there’s a race power law where we can just mass deport people on the basis of their race.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the kind of country. Yeah. So we’re doing well here. We’re doing well here.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nice.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I’m very excited. I’m very excited. We’re breath of fresh air for the political system. The Australian people are begging! They’re begging for a real Right-wing party. And we’re getting a lot of support. And we have a lot of people come down to our seminars, our political meetings, and say:

 

“Hey, look, I’ve been a Liberal Party member my whole life. I’ve gone to Liberal Party meetings my whole life and I’ve never seen anything like this. I’m so glad to see proud, patriotic Australians!”

 

And the feedback has just been amazing! The feedback, especially the older generation, like all the Boomers coming down, just saying thank, like basically just:

 

“Thank you, finally we’re seeing men that are just red blooded!”

 

And I’ve haven’t been to a Liberal Party meeting in a really long time. But I’ve had friends go and some of our members get paid to go to Liberal Party meetings [chuckling] because they got to fill seats. And the young guys that don’t have jobs, they’re like:

 

“All right, I’ll take the 100 bucks.”

 

And it’s that embarrassing, the Liberal Party at the moment. But they just report back and they just say:

 

“It’s just old people that are dying, that are just like falling asleep. And the people speaking are just homosexuals!”

 

It’s just homosexuals and girl bosses and that’s it. And they just useless rhetoric. And it’s just uninspiring. It’s just boring. And it’s just a freight train just running out of steam basically.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And that’s the system. It’s just a freight train running out of steam. They’ve got the momentum of decades and decades of organizing behind them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I mean, the parties are shrinking. The political parties here in Australia have never been so small. I think the Liberal Party has gone from like 60,000 members a decade ago to like, I think they’re barely getting 20,000 now. And I mean, just in the last election cycle, I think they’ve gone from 30,000 to 20,000 just in one election cycle.

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s fascinating! So, like, everyone’s checking out, but like the bureaucracy, the paperwork, the same. The scum that have the motivation, I guess, just to kind of get into that dirty world and keep it going. That’s what just is causing it to move on for now.

 

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t even put policies on our website yet and we’re already tracking to be the sixth biggest party in Australia out of the like 100 parties that are in Australia.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’d be hilarious!

 

[1:45:04]

 

Thomas Sewell: So the hype is real. The hype is real! Like a lot of people are hyping it online. And I don’t want people thinking like:

 

“Oh, we’re gonna have Prime Minister Thomas Sewell!”

 

That’s not likely. I want to make it clear that’s not likely at all! The chance of that is probably 1%. It’d have to be really happening for something like that to happen. It’d be like Ron Paul would have a meltdown. It’d be that kind of happening.

 

Henrik Palgren: And as we know, nothing ever happens.

 

Thomas Sewell: Until it happens. Nothing ever happens until it happens. And then one day it happens!

 

Henrik Palgren: Let me ask you this, Tom, though, because obviously you will be, as you know, and I’m sure you’ve thought about this too, you will be dealt with or treated on a totally different level. I mean, you would potentially see for the democratic system to defend itself, it would basically unravel the very definitions and guardrails that makes it being able to term itself as a democracy. I would reckon. What do you expect the pushback will be? And the way they will just say:

 

“No, you can’t do that!”

 

Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Just empty words. Just empty words. I think there’s probably less than a 10% chance they’ll be able to block us. I’m very confident it’s all going to go ahead. The black pillers need to be gassed! All the black pillers, just gas them!

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, no! And I’m not. When I bring, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not saying you’re black pilling.

 

Henrik Palgren: Sure. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: What I’m saying is there’s people online, I see comments every now and then where it’s like:

 

“They’re just gonna shut them down and make it illegal! And they’re all gonna go to jail!”

 

And it’s like, shut up! You’re either a jew or you’ve got your dick taped between your legs. Like, it’s just the most disgusting, demoralized, weak kind of energy. It’s so anti-Australian. Australians, we’re on a frontier we’re the frontier of the world and we’re surrounded on all sides by non-Whites. We’ve got a very harsh landscape, you know, we’ve allegedly got all these animals that try to kill us and to be like. And to be like:

 

“Oh, the government’s gonna shut us down, we can’t do anything!”

 

Is just the most weak cunt energy, like just fuck off! Go live somewhere else. This land is not built for weak cunts! This is hard cunt territory here and we don’t tolerate that shit! And those people, a lot of the time I think that they’re just jews. I think a lot of the time it’s just jews trying to sow fear in people that support us. The chances of the government blocking us is very low because they don’t have the framework to do it. They would have to nuke the whole system to do it. And are they prepared to do that? I don’t think they got the balls. I mean, you’ve got some rogue, really rogue politicians like Christopher Minns, who’s the New South Wales premier, saying that:

 

“He’s going to block the party and we’re not going to let this party come to power. And we’re going to dox all the members!”

 

And the AEC came out and made a statement saying:

 

“You can’t do that.”

 

And you’ve got like all these other Senators and all these other political leaders coming out and saying:

 

“Well, actually, we can’t do that. We have to let them. If they follow the rules, we have to let them.”

 

So it’s just basically kevtching like a bunch of losers. And it’s good. The more they kevtch, the better because it shows that they’re afraid and it doesn’t pass the pub test. And the average Aussie sees that on the news and goes:

 

“What? You want to ban this party? Why?”

 

And then they go on the website and they’re like:

 

“Oh, cool, I get all the interest paid off my mortgage and there’s less Indians. Fuck, that actually sounds all right!”

 

What we’re doing is really controversial from the concept that the country’s being destroyed by people that hate it! But it’s not controversial to the average Aussie, it really passes the pub test. And the idea that they want to ban it. The way the Australian psyche works is very clear. If the government wants to ban something, the average Aussie has this rebellious nature where they go:

 

“Why? Why does the government want to ban that?”

 

And they’ll look into it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, and that was my point, right? Bring it up. It’s a win-win regardless, right? It will expose the system or you actually have a foot in through the door. And either way it’s a plus.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re inevitable no matter what our strategy is. And we’ve got insurance policies, we’re not putting all our eggs in this one basket. But we see it as part of a matrix of power. And you can’t just build a political party. You have to build everything. It’s all about the back end. A political party is just, it’s not a front, but a political party it’s just the presence of power.

 

[1:49:50]

 

 

The real power of the Labor Party, for example, is not the Labor Party. It’s all the trade unions they control and all the non-White community groups that have all as a bloc joined the Labor Party, as a mosque, as a church, as a Chinese community center, as a, whatever it is.

 

Again, going back to the Liberal Party, whenever there is an influx of members in the Liberal Party because they just, every year they’re getting less and less and less members. But one branch might have an extra 200 members this year compared to last year. And how did that happen? How did that happen? How have they got 200 extra members? Well, we might have a friend, or a colleague or an associate that is, on paper, a member of that branch so that they can keep an eye on it. And they’ll tell us, they’ll report back to me and they’ll say:

 

“Oh, yep, some rich Chinese businessman just joined the party. He made a deal with the people that run that branch and he just got 200 of his laborers to sign up at the party.”

 

So he just signs up all the people that work for him and says:

 

“You have to do this. You work for me. You have to do this.”

 

Because they’re Chinese, they’ll just be like:

 

“Yes, sir.”

 

And they do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Yep, Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: And that’s the only way the Liberal Party or the Labor Party are getting these massive influxes. It’s just like rich Chinese or rich Indian businessmen or community leaders. The Chinese operate primarily through business, so they don’t have community leaders the way the Indians and the Muslims do, or the jews do. Well, the jews have both, obviously. They have business leaders and they have community leaders. But the Chinese, because they don’t have a religion and because they can’t organize as the, CCP, they organize as a front for the CCP, which is through CCP business here in Australia.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: And they bring in all their workers, they get their workers PR [Permanent Residency], then they get their workers citizenship, and then they start becoming a voting bloc.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: The hype is real! The Whites are leaving the major parties in droves, and the major parties are only retaining their numbers through the influx of browns.

 

And that’s why multiculturalism is their death rattle. That’s why they won’t ever give it up, because it’s the only way they can maintain their party.

 

So we’re forcing the dialectic. We’re heightening the contradictions. Everything that we’re doing is tactical. Everything we’re doing is strategic. And people for years have been saying:

 

“Oh, they’re wignats, they’re dumb, they don’t know what they’re doing. You got to join the Republican Party and you’ve got to subvert it from the inside.”

 

It’s like, these people are not creative thinkers and they’re not high IQ and they’re not morally courageous. The way you change the demographic destiny of the country is you have to schism the forces. And you have to put your flag up high. You have to raise the banner high! That’s the song. That’s the song! We’ve got the song, the Banner High!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, you got to raise the flag high and you got to say:

 

“Hello! Hello! We’re the Whites! We’re doing the White people thing!”

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. In America, that’s really hard! But it’s hard becauseyou guys haven’t laid the framework over the last 50 years, and we haven’t either. In Australia, we’re only picking this up. Well, there has been some that have tried, and obviously in America, people have tried, but we have built the meta-political energy that can be converted, or a portion of it can be converted into contesting a system that’s not a duopoly. You know, we’ve got that European style politics, but it wasn’t always like that. 20, 30 years ago we had the American style politics. The Greens were like 1% of the vote and that was like the third biggest party. Like you had the Australian Christians and you had like the Nationals, but the Nationals formed a coalition with the Liberals and then they became known as the Coalition.

 

And so you had like 95 plus percent of the vote in two parties. Now it’s like 70 or less. So it’s moving more and more into that European style and you have to just do the framework. So you just have to do the groundwork, you have to do the legwork.

 

Henrik Palgren: What I like about it is that it’s a different approach to it. Right. And you’re seeing that elsewhere too, that with numbers comes power and you build something else first as opposed to doing like, here’s a new political, well, who’s going to join a new political party, kind of thing. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, what caliber of people as well.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: How do you put a hierarchy?

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because there’s so much to do. I mean, yeah, we have a lot of people joining the party now that want to tell us what to do and they don’t want to be part of the organization.

 

So now we’re in a situation where we’re dealing with, well, how are we going to constitutionally frame the party and the organization together? Because there are a lot of people that are looking at the party and going:

 

“Holy shit! This could work!”

 

This not necessarily work in terms of take over the country, but this could become the third biggest party in the country quite quickly, or at least the fourth biggest party in the country quite quickly. This could be the Right-wing’s alternative to the Greens. And we could see One Nation form a coalition with the Liberal Party. But what we’re seeing is so much fracturing on the Right. We’re seeing a real contender on the Right coming out from the hardest possible position and they’re going:

 

“I’m going to get in this early.”

 

But they don’t want to be involved with the community. They don’t want to do the activism, they don’t want to do the push ups in the park, but they might have a good understanding of policy.

 

[1:55:14]

 

 

And so what we’re dealing with at the moment is having that conversation with these people and say:

 

“Hey, look, we’ll take your feedback. You can help advise us.”

 

I mean, depending on their skills, depending on what they are. But if you want to be a decision maker in the party, you have to join the order. And that’s rattling their minds a little bit because they’re used to:

 

“Oh, I joined the Liberal Party and I became the branch leader of the Liberal Party because I won a popularity contest.”

 

Or they join One Nation and same thing:

 

“Oh, I’ve joined this political party and I did this and I joined that political party. I did this.”

 

And then they’re joining our political party and then it doesn’t work like that.

 

And so that’s where we’re trying to balance democracy, which is an innate instinct of the public. They want to have a voice. They want to be involved and engaged in the process. But yeah, but at the same time, we’re a hierarchy. We’re building an order of men that are committed to fixing the country. And you have to be part of that order of men if you want to be within the leadership of the political party, or if you want to run as a candidate, for example.

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good.

 

All right, let me take some of these questions and comments here. Albert, first out the gates. Thank you so much, Albert. Huge dono. He says:

 

“Hi, Henrik. Looking forward to tonight show. Thomas Sewell is always one of my favorite guests. Especially looking forward to hearing his take on the Bondi beach shooting. Great show yesterday too. Take care.”

 

Thank you so much, Albert. We appreciate you so much. Thank you for your incredible support. Derek Rance, good to see you as well. Derek says:

 

“Thanks in advance for the show. It sounds like they are preparing Canada for the next extreme event to tighten the laws here.”

 

I’m sure they are. Good to see you, Derek, as always. Dercherso says:

 

“Good episode, good guest and good takes.”

 

Thank you, dear. Shabir, Gustav says:

 

“Hi Henrik. Finally able to catch the show live for change. Very impressive by Sewell.”

 

Yeah, we all are. Very good:

 

“Keep fighting the good fight, both of you.”

 

Thank you. Archie:

 

“Fascinating information. I missed the beginning. White power!”

 

Well, there you go. Thank you, Archie. Appreciate it. We got Alcion as well. Good to see you. Says:

 

“Happy to see Tom again. My question, Tom, so many of us around the world respect you tremendously and are taking notes from your group’s success. Do you think world jewery is hitting you especially hard because they understand your significance not just nationally, but globally?”

 

And he ends with:

 

“Hail Volk. Hail Red Ice and hail White Australia!”

 

Comments?

 

Thomas Sewell: World jewry has already done 99% of what it can do to us. And so now it’s got one left, one thing left to do to us. And I’m not sure if it’s prepared to do that one last thing. So there’s nothing more that it can do. I don’t have a bank account. I go into the bank, I can’t set one up. Yeah, I’ve been locked in solitary confinement. I’ve been framed, I’ve been imprisoned. You know, I’ve had unjust treatment through the courts. What else?

 

I mean, I’ve lost all the jobs. I can only work for friends now. The only work I can get is from people that are connected to our community, which is why building community is so important. You can’t just run away and hide from doxing for the rest of your life:

 

“I just don’t want to get doxed! I just don’t want to get doxed!”

 

That’s not a solution to the problem. That’s not even a band aid. That’s not even a band aid! Conflict avoidance doesn’t solve the problem.

 

The only way to solve the problem is insular communities, whether that’s big or small. Ideally, the bigger, the better. The bigger it is actually the more protected it is.

 

But we need to have communities. If you only know people on the Internet, you don’t even know their name. You’ve never even met their wife, you don’t even know what they do for work. Because people so worried about getting doxed, like everything’s hush hush, everything’s secret, like that’s the psyop! Not doxing yourself!

 

I mean, what more can the jews do other than kill me or try to kill me? I don’t know. There’s nothing more that they can do. There’s simply nothing that they haven’t already tried and failed. That they cannot stop what is coming. They cannot stop our determination, our will from triumphing. So well, it’s just assassination. That’s all they’ve got left.

 

So, Valhalla, here I come! I don’t care! I’m gonna keep going.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, I mean that’s the spirit you have to have, undoubtedly. And again it’s this is not gonna just go away. These sentiments, this mentality, the problems we’re faced with here and the reality of the situation is not just going to kind of morph into something else tomorrow on the Internet, because that’s a hip new topic to be into or something. I mean, this is not going away.

 

So, yeah, I’m with you. I think this is an inevitable trajectory for, again, I’m not saying the majority of White people, but a substantial enough portion of White people in order to make some real changes and clawing back control of our nations once again. I think it’s going to happen, you know, undoubtedly.

 

[2:00:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: I think it’s intergenerational as well. I think that in Australia this is the first time we’ve probably had an intergenerational movement here in Australia, which shows you how far behind we are from Europe. What I’m talking about is we’ve got the first generation of 18 year olds coming through now whose dads are members of the organization or have been for a long time. You know, so that is kind of embarrassing that it took to the year 2025 to have that.

 

I mean, the Muslims don’t have that issue. Like any Muslim you meet on the street. I’m pretty sure their dads are Muslim. I’m pretty sure their granddads are Muslim. I’m pretty sure their great granddad’s a Muslim. I’m pretty sure they’ve been organizing politically as Muslims for their entire existence.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: So as White people, we need to have intergenerational White nationalism. That’s the only way we’re going to survive.

 

So we’re finally seeing that now here in Australia. And there’s a lot of power in that. We’ve got young guys that are being brought up in the community and the government fears it, like the government at the moment, the thing that they were talking about the most on the media about us in the lead up to Bondi, before the Bondi thing happened, other than imprisoning me and imprisoning Joel Davis, was the home-schooling network. They are petrified at our home-schooling network! And we don’t even have much of a home-schooling network. It’s just in its infancy. Literally, it’s in its infancy. We’ve mostly got toddlers because most of the men in the organization are young men and we’ve only just started having kids in the last five years. So, we don’t even really have a proper home-schooling network set up. We’re just going with it. We can’t even send our kids to kindergarten anyway because you have to be vaccinated in Australia to send your kid to kindergarten.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a matter of necessity. It’s not just a matter of choice. It’s like even if we wanted to send our kids to kindergarten hypothetically, we actually legally can’t. We’d have to forge documents because our children are not allowed to go to kindergarten.

 

Henrik Palgren: Insane! Yeah. Homeschooling is banned in Sweden. Germany too.

 

Thomas Sewell: Of course.

 

Henrik Palgren: So no option. Incredible! Mr. Marsh Wood says:

 

“Hey, Tom, just want to say thank you for all what you guys are doing. I had a great time at the Victoria seminar and hope to attend more.”

 

He says. Do you have any comments? This was a local, for White Australia, the organization. That’s where you had the Victoria seminar?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we had it in Melbourne. So all the capital cities except for Sydney, New South Wales, had a seminar last weekend. So we’re syncing everything up and we released the policies for the first time on Saturday.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nice. Awesome! Based rat 1488 says:

 

“Hey, Tom, these conspiracy theories are opening the light to show that the jews are at fault for this attack either way, for funding the Australian government to spread multiculturalism in Australia. BR.”

 

Not sure if you have any comments on that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, sure. Of course the jews are behind multiculturalism in Australia. Yes. But I don’t think anyone in the media are talking about that. Like we are talking about it in our circles. But that’s very insulated.

 

And also you have to think tactically about it. You know, you can bring up that point. You can certainly approach that point. It could be considered a good time to approach that point. But the primary thing I believe that the movement needs to focus on when there’s a terror attack by Muslims against predominantly jews at Bondi beach, the primary point we need to come at it is that we don’t want either of these people here, that we want a sovereign country and that multiculturalism and the government are at fault. And yeah, I’m an anti-semite. I’m one of the most outspoken anti-semites in the fucking world! And I’m saying:

 

“Hey, guys, tactically it would be smart if we pile pressure on the government at this point. Like not to give away the tactic. But you gotta join the dog pile.”

 

Everyone’s attacking the government and for the right reasons or sometimes the wrong reasons. But, it’s not just all about, hey, let’s dogpile the jews while they’re being fucking shot. It’s like, look, there’s a time and a place to dogpile the jews, but it’s probably tactically smarter to dogpile the government when the jews are getting shot.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yes. About working with the energy, right? It’s like:

 

“No, no, it’s not the Muslims fault!”

 

You know, I’ve seen that too.

 

And that’s the thing with the:

 

“Well, that’s a false flag. The Manchester bombing was this or that.”

 

Thomas Sewell: These people have never met a Muslim!

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Anyone that’s met a Muslim. Look, I don’t know any Muslims. I’m living quite insular at the moment. But because I’m not allowed to go to a commercial gym. I get banned from every commercial gym I go to, but I don’t care! We’ve got our own gyms, but sometimes I like training at like proper fight gyms. But like some of the boys train at proper fight gyms and they’re saying to me that when it happened, all the Muslims at the fight gym are just like:

 

“Inshallah, brother, more dead jews. This is awesome!”

 

Just like openly in front of Aussies, in front of like multiculturalism. Like they don’t give a fuck l like the Muslims don’t give a fuck! All right. So they say:

 

“Oh this guy’s not a real Muslim!”

 

It’s like:

 

“Nah, you don’t understand where we’re at. It’s not 2000 fucking, … It’s not 1995 anymore. Like those days are fucking gone! It’s fucking race war! Everyone knows it.”

 

 

[2:05:46]

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right. Ghost Dogman says:

 

“Thomas is a great field expert on the Great War on Whites. I hope to see more from him on Red Ice TV. Free Joel!”

 

That’s right, Ghost Dogman. Thank you. J.C. Henderson, 94 says simply:

 

“Heil Red Ice. Heil Sewell. Thanks for doing what you’re doing.”

 

Well, thank you. Brian. 7316 says:

 

“Hi, and it’s great to see Tom on Red Ice again. He’s an Aussie hero. Like the Sewell’s charge against Antifa. Smiley face.”

 

There you go. Exactly! Very nice. Protector podcast:

 

“Hey Tom, I’m 15 year old from Australia that has been getting really into nationalism and National Socialism. I can’t join the NSN. I’m pretty. I’m a pretty tall and fit guy, at what age can I join?”

 

He’s asking you.

 

Thomas Sewell: As a general rule, we don’t accept applicants under the age of 16. Just as a general rule. Yeah, so.

 

Henrik Palgren: So you have to wait one year. Might just have to wait a year.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And even then between 16 and 18, we’re pretty discriminatory just because we don’t want to risk having someone join under the age of 18 that is a fucking, is an idiot! You know what I mean? We’ve had a lot of issues with people joining and not being honest to their parents.

 

And so we really only accept applicants under 18 now that have a good relationship with their parents. Because what we’ve got now is a whole state infrastructure set up where parents can now basically rat their children to the Stasi. And then it basically the parents can sign away their kid’s life to the government. So you know how like all that shit with like Britney Spears and how her dad like controlled her?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, unfortunately I do remember that. Yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Do you remember all that garbage? Yeah, it’s like it’s got a name to it. I can’t remember what the word is. But basically, if you’re under 18 and you join the Org and your parents are like full blown, like normgroid retards, they can basically call the government and be like:

 

“My son has joined NSN! He’s doing boxing at the park. Is he gonna be a terrorist?”

 

And then like a hysterical retard. And then basically the cops, then you’re just like chilling at home playing Minecraft or Roblox. And then the fucking feds rock up at your house and your parents let them in and then they come into your bedroom, they take your computer, they take your phone, they sit you down for like four hours and abuse you and tell you that you’re being brainwashed by maniacs:

 

“They’re gonna strap bombs to your chest and have you run at Muslims and have them blown up!”

 

And like just the most insane shit! Like some of these young lads that have had this, had to go through this, they’ve recorded the conversation. So I know what these piggies are saying to 16 year olds and how insane they are.

 

And I’ve listened to the most insane conversations where these piggies are saying like just the craziest shit to try to like brainwash these kids. They’re doing exactly what they’re accusing us of doing! They’re literally brainwashing these kids into believing the most insane shit, and then to make it even worse, your parents then sign off and you’ve got to do a de-radicalization course, which means you have a government friend now that comes and buys you KFC once a week and talks to you about your feelings for the next like year and a half. And you just don’t want to go through that! If you don’t have sick cunt parents, just fucking do your push ups, get a trade, finish high school, talk to your mates about this stuff. You know what I mean? And be careful how you talk to your mates about the stuff. Because a lot of guys that have reached out to the org, that aren’t in the org but have reached out and said:

 

“Hey, I’ve been forced to this DeRad thing, do I have to do it?”

 

And we say:

 

“Oh, what happened? Like, we’ve never heard of you. How are you on a DeRad thing?”

 

And they’ve said:

 

“Oh, I was talking about the Holocaust in class. And some kid in my class told the teacher and the teacher called the government and now I’ve got a government friend.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Fuck dude, like, you got to be careful!”

 

But [chuckling] like, the Zoomers aren’t careful. They say crazy shit at school and they don’t realize that the teachers are trained to inform on them, if they say anything remotely like nationalistic. So you got to be very careful if you’re a young guy.

 

But if your parents. Look, if your dad is willing to meet with myself or whoever the state leader is or whoever the region rep is, if your dad’s willing to meet with us, then yes, you can join at whatever age.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: But it’s basically like parental permission because, …

 

Henrik Palgren: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: We just can’t be fucked dealing with the government.

 

Henrik Palgren: Like, sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a joke!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. All right.

 

[2:10:32]

 

Thomas Sewell: You can go to Drag Queen Story Hour, of course. Yeah, that’s fine. You can’t join the Nazi boxing club. We will strap a bomb to your chest, apparently, according to police, because that’s happened.

 

Henrik Palgren: I think that answered your second follow up, that Protector podcast too, in terms of what you can do to get involved more in that space.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, talk to your dad. Tell your dad why you want to join and go from there.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And if your dad’s cool with it. What a lot of the dads say to us, because we do have a lot of people under the age of 18 involved and what a lot of the dads say to us is:

 

“I just don’t want them doing activism.”

 

And we say:

 

“That’s cool! Activism isn’t compulsory. It’s not compulsory. He can come and train, but, yeah, he’s not allowed to do activism.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Very good. Canadian Girl Rumble says:

 

“Much love and support from Canada. Hail Sewell and the NSN!”

 

Thank you, Canadian Girl Rumble. Aussie autist 88, says:

 

“Preferred meal, butter chicken or tikka masala?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Butter chicken. [chuckling]

 

Henrik Palgren: Butter chicken. There you go.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re all going home. [chuckling] But we got the recipe!

 

Henrik Palgren: We got the recipe.

 

Thomas Sewell: Butter chicken is actually an ancient Aryan dish.

 

Henrik Palgren: Probably. Of course it is. Indo Aryan Oziotis again says:

 

“Our faggot ministers have zero vision. Zero vril. They are all so sterile and impotent. The vision of White Australia will go far!”

 

There you go. Thor’s Rune. Yeah, go ahead.

 

Thomas Sewell: Preach racist, preach!

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go.

 

Henrik Palgren: Thor’s Rune:

 

“Great discussion, great points laid out by Thomas. Standing strong for his nation and our people. Activism is no easy task in a politically hostile environment. Hail from SoCal!”

 

Southern California. Holy smokes. Get out of there if you can. Anyway, my condolences, but thank you, Thorstroom. Appreciate that. But the Bearded Indian says:

 

“Why do you think the Muslim retreated to the bridge instead of charging towards the crowds of targets?”

 

Well, he was on a vantage point. It was up high, obviously, so that was his best view, I would assume. What do you think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, same reason.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: They could cover each other from there.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, because his dad. Didn’t his dad have a shotgun? He was like the one who’s going to take care of there’s someone that’s approaching the son. The main shooter. That’s what he looked like to me anyway, But I’m not sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, and also the dad was fat and slow.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: So it’s just common sense. But anyway, what a silly question. Bearded Indian usually has good questions.

 

Henrik Palgren: Aussie autistic says:

 

“Hail Odin. Hail victory! Enjoy the solstice. Have a good Yuletide.”

 

Well, thank you. Exactly! That’s coming up here soon. The 21st.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’ve got midsummer this year.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, that’s right. You get Midsummer.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: So do you celebrate it upside down, too? Is that how you do it?

 

Thomas Sewell: We do, yeah. We hang out from the, …

 

Henrik Palgren: The Hanged Man.

 

Thomas Sewell: We hang from the trees.

 

Henrik Palgren: Odin.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, The Upside Down.

 

Henrik Palgren: Nine nights. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I sacrificed myself to myself.

 

Henrik Palgren: One eye patch when Randall Flag says:

 

“Thomas, Australia’s elite are primarily composed of old mining clans. From what I hear, they are the biggest turncoats who sold off your mines to the CCP. How do you propose on retaking your resources?”

 

Interesting question.

 

Thomas Sewell: At bayonet point!

 

Henrik Palgren: What?

 

Thomas Sewell: At bayonet point.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, there we go. Okay, well that explains it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So many people ask me:

 

“How are you going to do this? How are you going to do that?”

 

We’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Interesting small things to hone in on. But I mean, it’s not small, I guess.

 

Thomas Sewell: But yeah, we’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: If there’s a will, I guess. Okay, we got one.

 

Thomas Sewell: The how we’re gonna do it? Well, when we’re close to it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, well, who knows?

 

Thomas Sewell: If you need to know, if you’re part of it, we’ll tell you, will be part of it.

 

Henrik Palgren: You will find out. How about that?

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s so many spectators. Imagine going down to the football match and you’re a spectator and you’re in the crowd. There’s like 10,000 people in the crowd and you’re just shouting at the coach:

 

“How are you gonna get that touchdown? How are you gonna do it?”

 

Henrik Palgren: It’s impossible!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s like:

 

“Shut up!”

 

You want to join the team? I’ll teach you. Join the team and I’ll teach you how we’re going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right. That’s a good answer.

 

Thomas Sewell: Sitting on the sideline:

 

“How are you going to do this?”

 

All right, we get why democracy is really gay.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, it’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Everyone wants a voice but no one wants to do the work. Everyone wants a voice, but no one wants to do it. The way it says, “rights without duties”, that’s the primary issue. So democracy that we’re going to build is “rights and duties”. You’ll get lots of rights, but you got to do the duties! You got to put your time in on the gun. They’re not inalienable:

 

“I’m born so therefore, hahaha, I get everything!”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how Rome collapsed.”

 

Because that just creates a fat, weak, retarded society. Look what happened to the Romans. They were born with the privilege of being a Roman citizen. They didn’t have to work for it anymore. They have to fight for it! They didn’t have to do any duty. They forgot their own religion, everything. It just deteriorated them, because they forgot how to just put in the work for the race.

 

[2:15:35]

 

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, it’s so hard, right? You get success breeds complacency and comfort. And then out of that it’s so hard to motivate the younger people and the kids specifically, obviously, that grow up in that. Right. They have the abundance, the affluence. It’s extremely hard. Right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Someone asked me:

 

“How are we going to take back the Commonwealth Bank?”

 

Henrik Palgren: Is [chuckling] that the priority?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, but we’re going to do it. We are going to do it. That’s part of policy too. It’s like we’re just going to take ownership of it:

 

“What do you mean, but how are you going to do it?”

 

We’re just going to do it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Trust the plan. All right, how about that?

 

Thomas Sewell: What do you want? You want me to write like a 300 page essay on, like, how we’re going to manage all the branches?

 

Henrik Palgren: Needed in writing Tom. Right now!

 

Thomas Sewell: How did they sell it? Did the guy that sold it off, did he write a 300 page? He probably did. Knowing democracy.

 

Henrik Palgren: Legalese wise. Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, they just sold it to their mates. They just got rid of it. They just sold it to their mates. They just had friends. And now it’s 1.3 trillion in the private sector and it was a state asset. They just gave it to their mates.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep. Of course!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re just going to take it back!

 

Henrik Palgren: When do they do that by the way?

 

Thomas Sewell: 1996.

 

Henrik Palgren: 96, okay, interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: They just gave it to their mates. That’s what they did. They gave it to their mates. They gave it to their jewish mates.

 

Henrik Palgren: Of course. Okay, we got one more here. Alufaltruda, if I say that correctly:

 

“What would you say to men who want to participate in the inner activism part of White Australia but aren’t yet physically fit? Would you allow fat guys or twigs to join the park training?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we have fat guys and skinny guys at training. Yeah, we do. Like the fitness testing is not:

 

“Hey, you can’t hang out with us, associate with us or train with us if you don’t pass this testing.”

 

That’s not how the testing works. The testing works is we’ve got a hierarchy where you don’t become an official member. There’s like a process where you go through like an initiation phase, like the bikies would call it, like a prospecting phase, like at work it might be called a trainee phase. You go through your apprenticeship, you go through like a trainee phase where you do six months and then you get promoted and you do another six months and you get promoted. But at those promotions you have to meet certain fitness standards.

 

So there’s some guys that have been in the org three years and they haven’t been promoted because they have never worked on their fitness. They just come once a month, they hang out, they stand at the barbecue, they have a cigarette and you know what I mean, it’s like they’re a minority. They’re in the minority. There’s only a couple guys that do that it’s not a good culture if there was a whole bunch doing it. But when it’s just a couple guys coming down, they can keep an eye on things. They can do a bit of security, they can check license plates, they can help with the vetting. You know, they can be part of other operations that not everyone has to train.

 

But again, it is what it is. Different horses. We got Sausage Turners we got security guards, we got all sorts of people.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right, the Bearded Indian has a second go here. I guess he must do a better question.

 

Thomas Sewell: Let’s go round two.

 

Henrik Palgren: NSN must publicize the shit out of this. Every politician who promoted diversity is responsible for the mass murder. Job for the clippers to tether those politicians face together.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah. Now the online warfare is really important. And I mean the politicians, their reaction, I mean Burke, Marles and Albo, they are shaking! They are shaking in their boots. You can hear it in their voice. They got gay lisps. I mean, it is embarrassing!

 

I mean, there’s one video. You got to play it quickly. You got to play it quickly. I’ll find it, I’ll send it. I’ll DM it to you.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’ve got to play this video. Oh, it is embarrassing!

 

Henrik Palgren: I’ll take the other one here.

 

Thomas Sewell: This is Australia’s Defense Minister.

 

Henrik Palgren: Find that there.

 

Thomas Sewell: I found it. I found it.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, yeah, send it to me. I’ll pull it up here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Check your DMs. You got to play this video.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, it’s through. Okay, let me save that down real quick there then. We’ll get that one.

 

Of course I got some, the Rumble channel up in the meantime here as well. Well, I download that for White Australia. You guys are obviously on the main website. There is WhiteAustralia.org or simply WhiteAus. I think you can go to as well, dot org to get to the website.

 

[2:19:54]

 

Thomas Sewell: They both redirect. There’s a whole bunch of things that redirect to White Australia.org.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, here we go. Let’s see if that downloaded here. I’m going to import that down properly. Doesn’t seem like it hopefully works. No file format. Oh, it’s still downloading. It’s slow as hell! Okay. Also in the meantime that. Well, I’m just waiting for that. Just be a couple of seconds. There’s a Telegram page obviously for White Australia as well. Then you have your personal one. Tom Sewell uncensored on Telegram. Any other social media links website where people can, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I got a Gab. Thomas underscore Sewell. But I just don’t use it. I need to, but I just keep forgetting. But Gab feels pretty dead lately. I don’t know. We’re banned from Twitter.

 

Next year I’m gonna try to get on Twitter and Instagram and just see how long I last. But we’re going to launch the policy parties first. I’ve got a list of priorities and then I’m going to just do like I’m going to spam videos and social media stuff and if I get a week, I’ll be really happy.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay, here’s the clip. It’s down on Defense Minister Richard Marles. Here’s his comments. Check it out.

 

Sky News: Do you feel like there needs to be and should there be a greater emphasis on hate speech from Muslim clerics in the Western part of Sydney?

Richard Marles: I think. Look, I think as I said earlier, what we’ve done is criminalize more forms of hate speech, and we’ve criminalized the Nazi salute. Obviously that’s in its own context, but we need to be looking at all of this. And it is really important that we have., …

Sky News: So should there be a greater emphasis on this hate speech from Muslim clerics, then?

Richard Marles: I don’t want to. We will go through all of this. I emphasize that we have done more in terms of criminalising hate speech than we have seen from any other government. But we need to look at all of this and we need to make sure that we’ve got the right laws in place and that we are doing everything we can to keep safe that the vibrant multicultural society, …

 

Henrik Palgren: There it is! [chuckling] There it is! Oh, my gosh! All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Please, please, Yahweh, send me your gayest, most retarded enemies. [chuckling]

 

Henrik Palgren: That is funny!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s Defense Minister of Australia, a gay retard!

 

Henrik Palgren: He seems genuinely rattled!

 

Thomas Sewell: Tony Burke has got like this high pitched, I’ve never heard his voice go high pitch before. Tony Burke is like. He’s got like the fear complex at the moment when the media are asking questions. And he got booed. He came down to the memorial and the jews all booed him. And this is the guy that deported a neo-Nazi for the jews! And the jews are booing him.

 

Henrik Palgren: Doesn’t matter. Yep, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: You deports Nazis, but you didn’t deport the Muslims.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, they do that right, though. And it sounds like:

 

“Yeah, you’ve been very good. You did this great. We’re very happy!”

 

No, at that point, you have the opportunity to push really hard to get just much more of what you want. And how do you want the politicians to act for you on behalf of you? They know how to do that. Okay, we got two more here, Tom, before we let you go here. Line Crosses said:

 

“The police must have had so many angles on those shooters. Shooters were exposed, evident by the many camera angles on them. Sloppy.”

 

I mean, I heard one rabbi there, they interviewed him was like:

 

“It must have been 20 minutes.”

 

Or something. And it’s like. I don’t think it was 20 minutes. It probably felt like 20 minutes for the people that were there. But five maybe, I don’t know, maybe 10, I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, it was almost 10. It was almost 10 minutes. Yeah.

 

Henrik Palgren: Which is a long time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Which is way too long. Like Bondi, the traffic’s bad, but there’s always cops at Bondi Beach. I’ve never not seen cops at Bondi Beach. I’ve always seen police at Bondi beach, usually in teams of two or teams of four.

 

So the fact that it took 10 minutes to get to the shooting, to resolve the shooting, and took probably I don’t know, five minutes to get there. There’s video footage of cops driving past the bridge. So they had an angle to shoot out the window up that bridge. There’s cops driving past and they didn’t stop. They just kept going. So, yeah, despicable!

 

But fat Chungus. Not the Chungus that arrested Joel, but another Chungus was the one that got the killer shot on the dad. Really small Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. There’s footage of the Chungus. There was a fat Chungus cop that got the shot off. So he wasn’t a beat cop. He was in a suit. So that just shows you know, there’s cops in dress shirts walking around, right?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

[2:24:50]

 

Thomas Sewell: How did he get there? How did he get there before the cops that were in uniform. He’s not wearing a bulletproof vest either.

 

So the cop that got the shot off was just a fat Chungus from the office that might have been just getting lunch. I don’t know the story yet. But another interesting thing that I forgot to mention was the media, because a whole bunch of lifeguards tried to assist in the process as well. And there was lifeguards that were there on the scene before the cops got there, as well as the Aussies that just like stomped the two guys on the ground on the bridge. But there was a guy trying to read out the names of the lifeguards that had helped save people’s lives. And helped try to deal with it. And the media wouldn’t let this guy read out the names of the lifeguards. Because the media here in Australia, all they’re saying on the news is just:

 

“Look at this brown guy that saved the day! Look at this jewish guy that saved the day. Look at all these heroes of multiculturalism!”

 

And it’s like, they won’t read out the names. And they’re like:

 

“His name was Al Hamid Muhammad!”

 

And then they just say it like 20 times.

 

So, yeah, you turn on the news and it’s like:

 

“And the hero was Al Hamid Muhammad!”

 

And it’s just, on repeat, on repeat, on repeat!

 

And it’s like, they wouldn’t let a guy read out the names of the lifeguards that tried to help because it’s like Ben Stewart, Thomas Stevens. You know what I mean?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah, exactly! Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: All Aussie names.

 

Henrik Palgren: I mean, the solution, therefore, is:

 

“Let’s bring in a million more Muslims to protect us from the Muslims!”

 

Right? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: We need migrants to stop us from migrants!

 

Henrik Palgren: Exactly! See, the good ones cancel out the bad ones, I guess, but they kill White Australians in the process, obviously. Yeah. People are asking chat here:

 

“What’s a chungus? Chubby, thick, large?”

 

Is that the definition?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Chungus is like a big fat chungus. You know, like a Big Chungus. It was like, I’ll just Google it. Big chungus. They don’t know the Big Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s like the, … Bugs Bunny! Exactly! Yeah, that’s the bunny. Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: If you don’t know the Big Chungus.

 

Henrik Palgren: Home of the Brave says:

 

“The most white pilling is listening to Tom Sewell. Absolutely no one wants to step up in America, so I guess I’m gonna have to do it!”

 

Well, that’s the spirit. That is not true, by the way. But that’s the spirit obviously. If you don’t think anyone does, then, yeah, you do it:

 

“Thanks for giving me hope and vectorizing the Vril.”

 

Hail home of the brave.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I get a lot of DMs from Americans and they all want to be Australia’s Thomas Sewell. Sorry, America’s Thomas Sewell. I get a lot of DMs. I get a lot of people unsolicited in the DMs on Telegram and they’re like:

 

“Check out my page, Tom. I’m the next Thomas Sewell!”

 

And then I check out the page and it’s got two subscribers. And I’m like:

 

“Dude, I’m not going to be your third subscriber. I’m sorry, you’re going to have to put your time on the gun. You have to build up a bit of a following yourself.”

 

They’re like:

 

“Tom, can you share my page? I’m America’s Thomas Sewell!”

 

No, you’re not. You’re unfortunately not. I’m sorry.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, we got another Thomas. Does a good job. Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s Hammer. There’s all sorts of guys. There’s lots of guys in America. There’s a lot of guys that are not necessarily like doxed, like not name fagging, as they say on the chins. There’s a lot of guys that just, they just put in the work. They just build the active club or they build their organization. You know, they just put their folk first and they do it without the glory. And yeah, also a little bit off topic. I was in jail, so no one told me. No one told me Chris Cantwell’s a faggot! What the fuck happened? What the fuck is going on?

 

Henrik Palgren: I don’t wanna, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He sent me a message like a week ago. He’s like:

 

“Hey, man, can you share this post for me?”

 

And I’m like, I didn’t say:

 

“Yeah, all right.”

 

But I was like, in my head:

 

“Yeah, all right.”

 

But I always read everything first before I share. Always. And I’m like scrolling through and it was like something about gay sex. And I was like:

 

“Hang on a minute. What the fuck!”

 

And then I read it again and I replied to him:

 

“Chris, what the fuck are you talking about?”

 

And then I sent it to the boys and they’re like:

 

“Yeah, bro, did you not know?”

 

I was like:

 

“No one told me. I was in prison. No one told me!”

 

And then I went through his page and he was like:

 

“When I was 14, I had sex with a man. He wasn’t attractive.”

 

It’s like:

 

“What the fuck Chris, you fucking weird cunt!”

 

Henrik Palgren: Imagine that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Holy shit! He fell off.

 

Henrik Palgren: Imagine that!

 

Thomas Sewell: He was a bit of an oddball, but fuck, he fell off.

 

Henrik Palgren: Some things kind of makes sense.

 

Thomas Sewell: Eric Striker likes biting my ankles. I hope he’s biting Chris Cantwell’s ankles. Hopefully he doesn’t get AIDS.

 

Henrik Palgren: Well, yeah, that’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Why are people having a go at me when there’s cunts like that! I should be, …

 

Henrik Palgren: I don’t think anyone’s giving him a pass, to be honest.

 

But yeah, I get your point.

 

[2:30:01]

 

Thomas Sewell: No one’s giving him a pass, but how did that fucking slip through to the keeper? Someone must have known!

 

Henrik Palgren: Probably.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, that’s one of our vetting questions. You know, that’s one of our vetting questions is that:

 

“If someone tells you in secret something like that, would you share it with other people? Or would you keep it a secret?”

 

That’s one of our vetting questions.

 

Henrik Palgren: When did you start being gay? That’s the vetting question. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! [chuckling] I shouldn’t be giving away our vetting questions. Antifa’s probably got through stage one. They just probably don’t get stage two or stage three. But like, that’s in stage one. Like, are you a fag sympathizer? We don’t want you. That’s how we got this problem in the first place.

 

Henrik Palgren: I’m sure they answer honestly on that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because in politics, there’s not many forces worse than gays. Like, there’s jews. Jews are worse! But like gays are fucked! They’re insidious. They’re absolutely insidious. They have to be just completely rooted out of every single organization. That’s how politics have been taken over. Like people that can be blackmailed. You know what I mean?

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And yeah, gays are all ashamed of themselves. That’s why they have to take drugs to do it. They’re freaks! They’re disgusting freaks! There’s no normal gays. There’s no such thing as a normal gay. They’re all freaks! Don’t associate with them. Anyone that associates with gays, I don’t associate with them.

 

Henrik Palgren: I agree.

 

Thomas Sewell: Even straight people. I just can’t tolerate anyone that’s like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a gay friend.”

 

Like:

 

“Nuke! See you later. Don’t talk to me again. Do not contact. Lose this number.”

 

Henrik Palgren: We got Line Cross:

 

“Small fat chungus has the most testosterone in the force.”

 

Yeah, that’s interesting. Isn’t that interesting? Megawatts 80:

 

“Hi, Tom!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Hi.

 

Henrik Palgren: There you go. I was waiting for a hi back. Line Cross again:

 

“I can’t help but imagine the media crap storm if a member or two of the NSN was there and foiled that attack.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, they probably wouldn’t have done much except get shotgun to the face!

 

Henrik Palgren: Taking them out too.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I mean, to be fair, that one guy did disarm the fat chungus that ran down. It didn’t even make sense. Anyway, I won’t go into.

 

Henrik Palgren: Rob Jasimer here says:

 

“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children!”

 

Correct. Thank you, Rob.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. All right.

 

Henrik Palgren: I think we’re caught up there. Thank you, Tom, so much for joining us today. I appreciate it. Always pleasure talking to you. Keep up the good work, the excellent work, the fantastic work you’re doing down there. We’re all watching and very interested in the development, not only, of course, the political kind of faction of this, the arm, the wing of what you’re doing, obviously, but yeah, it’s always a pleasure having you on, man! And anything else, closing thoughts you want to run through here before we wrap up for today?

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re gonna win! Yeah, I don’t have a closing spiel. I think I’ve said a lot today and yeah, just gas all the black pillers! Just don’t associate with black pillers. The worst humans in this movement are the black pillers. Just don’t associate with them. They’re like a social disease in the movement. And we have made so much progress over the years because we just gas the black pillers! We just get rid of them. We just don’t associate with them.

 

Now, you can be a critic, and you can be a fair critic and you can be realistic.

 

Henrik Palgren: You want that part of it for sure. Shoot holes in everything. Right? But, …

 

Thomas Sewell: But you don’t want people that by their very nature they’re unhappy, they’re unlucky, they’re pessimistic. Don’t associate with these kinds of people because they will destroy your clique. They will destroy your movement, they will destroy your business, they will destroy your organization, they will destroy your family. Don’t associate with fundamentally unhappy, weak willed people! Just don’t associate with them. They’re just the chaff. You know what I mean? They’re just the chaff and they’re not going to make it. They’re just not going to make it.

 

And all the progress we have made as an organization has been this “triumph of the will”. You, when you get involved and you do five years or even less, like maybe within two or three years you might start to feel, you might feel the energy. Like you can feel the winds of change or the vibrations or whatever is. You can feel it and you can feel that progress coming from just these high vril, high energy like people, men and women, it’s male and female energy, in different ways. It’s obviously predominantly male energy in the movement. But that energy, that high virile energy, like there’s so many face doxed people, there’s so many people that aren’t face doxed, but they work really hard behind the scenes and they just love it! You’ve just got to love it! You’ve got to learn to love the struggle. You’ve got to learn to love this battle we’re in. And when you’re faced with adversity, you should always just see it as a challenge. You should always just see it as:

 

“Oh, that’s what they’re throwing at us now. Oh, that’s where my life’s at now!”

 

Just take a step back, breathe, calm down, get your bearings and get stuck back in. Get back to work! And yeah, that’s the success of my organization. I don’t tolerate it. We just get rid of you.

 

And that’s why we’re growing. There was a point where we got stuck at 20, 30 guys. And building a little active club with five guys is pretty easy. It’s really easy. Almost everyone can do it. Almost anyone that’s not a retard can do it. You can build four or five guys in an active club. When you get to 20 to 30 guys, it becomes very difficult. You really need to have some leadership qualities.

 

[2:36:06]

 

But also you start to realize that not all 20 to 30 men are equal. And that you need to have a really good core. You need to have people that really have good energy and good commitment level and they’re there for the right reasons. They’re not just loser freaks that hate society and are looking for any kind of vagrant group to attach themselves to. You want to just stay clear of the loser freaks! You just don’t want losers! That doesn’t mean everyone has to be as corporate or like high paid or like big earner, tradesman, driving a nice car.

 

It’s not about status and it’s not about money. It’s about work ethic, it’s about integrity. Yeah, that’s way more important, that’s way more important than money. Don’t think that it’s about money. It’s got nothing to do with money. You’ll find that there’s lots of people with money that have really bad work ethic. They just know the right people, they went to the right school, their dad’s friends are wealthy, blah blah, blah. And that’s why they drive a $200,000 car.

 

Whereas there’s men driving around five thousand dollar cars and they got a great work ethic. They’re hustlers and not in a gay cringe, corporate capitalist mindset, in terms of a political mindset. They get home, they’re video editing, they’re doing shit, they’re on Twitter, they’re Twitter maxing, they’re in the gym, they’re fighting.

 

Okay, so what? They drive a $5,000 a car, who cares? You know what I mean? Like they got a good work ethic.

 

So yeah, you want to surround yourself with people that are willing to work for nationalism. They’re willing to put in the work. And pessimists and black pillers, they just want to sit there and just sink the boat, you know, Imagine you’re on a journey, you’re on a mission. You want cunts on the fucking oars! Get on the fucking oars! Let’s go!

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct. Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: And if you’ve got a skill, if you can navigate, if you can navigate, you got to first do your time on the fucking oars. We don’t need all this dead weight on the boat saying:

 

“Oh, we should go this way or we should go that way!”

 

Shut up! Get on the oar. All right.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah. Learn to work as a team first. Right? Kind of thing.

 

Thomas Sewell: And get in the rhythm.

 

Henrik Palgren: Get your individuality, your emotions to the side. Just get rid of all of that and create a unit that can cooperate and then from there you can do that.

 

And as you said, I mean, yeah, you should surround yourself with people that are smarter than you, that are better than you, they know more than you. And that creates an environment where you are all feeding off each other. You grow, you become better.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And you should lift people up that aren’t.

 

Henrik Palgren: Oh, 100%.

 

Thomas Sewell: But don’t waste time on people that are fundamentally broken. And the younger you are, the more time you waste on broken people. When I was young, I wasted years on broken people trying to help them.

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And yeah, as Adolf Hitler says:

 

“God helps no one that doesn’t help themselves. And German people, help yourselves!”

 

And I believe that about us as Aryans, as White people. Like we need to help ourselves. And yeah you don’t want to like cut off people too quickly. You want to give people time. Some people take six months, some people 12 months.

 

But yeah, you’re not always going to find yourself surrounded by people that are making more money than you or that are smarter than you or whatever. Sometimes you’re going to find yourself surrounded by people that are are less fit than you and, or, whatever the metric is that you’re measuring. And yeah, what mateship is about is about lifting up the guys around you know, and a good amount of positive bullying, a good amount of positive work. Inclusive bullying.

 

Henrik Palgren: Shaming and bullying works 100%.

 

Thomas Sewell: Lift up the guys around you. That’s one way that an organization grows is that guys join and it’s not that you’re joining a self improvement society. Go join the Freemasons if that’s what you’re looking for! You know what I mean? Like our organization, the purpose of it isn’t a self improvement society, but I do believe that’s a side effect on it.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s a positive side effect of it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! Yeah. It’s a side effect of brotherhood.

 

Henrik Palgren: Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a side effect of an effective brotherhood. All effective brotherhoods are do that. And what we have at the moment is like veterans organizations and men’s clubs and stuff like that. They’re all just like pity parties. I don’t go to them because I know that they’re gay as fuck, but I know people that go to these like guys that I was in the army with and you know, tradesmen, they go to these like groups that aren’t our group. They go to these like socially approved groups after work and it’s just like they’re just getting lectured by some faggot about toxic masculinity. And it’s just like:

 

“How do you fucking put up with this? Like you don’t need friends that bad, dude. Like, just go to the gym!”

 

[2:40:44]

 

Henrik Palgren: Just making friends there, nothing else.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, like a lot of the veterans organizations, for example, a bit off topic, but a lot of them are just that what you feed grows pity parties. They’re just like:

 

“Oh, I have nightmares.”

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s just like, fuck, man!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yeah.

 

At some point you have to like a new vision, Focus on something new, fresh. And I know it sucks! I’m not trying to diminish it. But I’m saying also at some point you got to kind of keep busy, right? You got to get active and busy.

 

Thomas Sewell: If you’ve got depression, for example, and you go to the depression week and you’re like:

 

“I’m so depressed I can’t get out of bed in the morning!”

 

Is that ever going to fix the problem?

 

Henrik Palgren: No, no, it’s not.

 

Thomas Sewell: You just need a fucking injection of Vril!

 

Henrik Palgren: Yep, Correct.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just get out of fucking bed. Find a purpose.

 

But yeah, anyway, I’ve said enough.

 

Henrik Palgren: No, no, it’s all good. All good. Dr. Jenstein:

 

“Thanks guys. Great stream!”

 

Yeah, I really appreciate it. Great conversation, Tom, as always, I appreciate you. And again, thanks. Salute to all of you and the guys over there. Hope Joel gets out soon.

 

And as always, of course, …

 

Thomas Sewell: 23rd, hopefully.

 

Henrik Palgren: 23rd. Oh, really? Okay. So day before Yule. Okay, nice.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, a week.

 

Henrik Palgren: All right, well, say hi to him from us here at Red Ice. We’re thinking of him.

 

All right, Tom, have a great Yule. Christmas done. Coming up here shortly, soon.

 

Thomas Sewell: Thank you for having me.

 

Henrik Palgren: That’s right.

 

And obviously I suppose you say Australia for the White man! We’ll see you later, Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: The rest must go!

 

Henrik Palgren: The rest must go. [chuckling] There you go.

 

All right, cheers. Take care. Thanks.

 

All right, guys, there we go. Thank you so much to Tom again for joining us. We appreciate you.

 

All right, we’re gonna wrap up right there. I do want to say thanks to our executive producers though, before we let you go, but a little plug here for tomorrow. We’re talking with Sven Longshanks and of course he was imprisoned by the UK system for essentially podcasting. That will be live at 2 PM Eastern, which is 8 o’ clock Central European time. Eight in the evening, obviously. We got Flashback Friday coming up on Friday.

 

After that, 5 PM Eastern. That’s 11 in the evening, 2300 hours Central European time. And then we’ll take a little break about a week or so. we’ll take a little yule break and then we’ll be back with more after that, obviously, but a few more shows before we take a break. So also before we wrap up here, where are you guys? Where do we want to find my executive producers? You’re hiding somewhere. Great way to support us, of course, is to get a membership. I can do that plug while I’m looking for that too. Redicemembers.com we have Red Icetv.locals.com subscribestar.com Redice. 10 bucks a month helps us tremendously. Might not make that much of a big, big difference to you individually, but the more of you guys who do it helps us tremendously. So we can continue to do this and do more and do better and do all the things we want to do. So do consider it.

 

And by the way, if you do want to get a, if you want to get that down, it’s about 10 bucks a month. But if you get a longer sub@redismembers.com you can get it all the way up to two years. That gives you about 20, sorry, 35, almost 40% off. So that’s a great way to save a little bit as well. Gets cheaper per month that way.

 

Here we go. Here’s our executive producers for today as well. Albert. Arctic Wolf, first out the gates. Thank you so much, Albert, for your incredible support. We have William Fox from America First Books as well. Thank you, William. We got Angry White Soccer Mom. Thank you for your support.

 

We also have Purple Haze. Thank you for being an executive producer. And we got Glenn. Thank you, Glenn. Appreciate your support as well. Also Down Under, I believe. Thank you, Glenn. We got Red Pill Rundown. Thank you for being there for us so we can be there for you. We got President Obunga. Thank you for your support as well. Then we got Teutonic Werebear. We’re appreciate you. Thank you Werebear.

 

We got Good Luck Lap. Thank you so much for your support. We have number one, Jeeves. We appreciate you as well. Thank you. Then we got Hungarian Mom. Thank you to the whole family. We appreciate your support. We also have Santoso. Thank you, Santoso for your support. I’m starting to Lisp a bit, the Australian politicians are rubbing off! Sun Destroyer 520. Thank you. Appreciate it. We also have the Deplorable Extraordinaire. Thank you for your support. And the Booman, our latest edition for the executive producers.

 

Then we have Charles Turner Jr Johansson, Lero Dumont. Eyes open single action army, Lord H.P. Lovecraft. We have Trevor, Der Schwabe, Alcyon, Aurelion, Perfect Brute, Greg M J Barr, Chris W and Skarzinski. That’s our producers. You guys are like five subscribers so thank you so much! Our executive producers are like 10 so we appreciate you guys tremendously. Thank you once again. If you want a shout out at the end of the show, special thanks from us at Red Ice. Go to RedIcemembers.com or subscribestar.com Red Ice and get one of those tiers.

 

All right guys, that’s it done for us today. Thank you so much for joining us again. Thanks to Tom. Great show as always. We’ll be back tomorrow with Sven Longshanks actually. Folk first ladies and gentlemen. We’ll see you tomorrow.

 

Now do make sure that you follow us on our Rumble channel for more Red Ice TV on Rumble.com or on X @redice TV. You can of course go to Redice dot TV as well. Tune in to our live streams and shows. Flashback Friday live on Fridays at 5 PM Eastern. No go zone Wednesdays at 5 PM Eastern. We also do interviews, videos, clips and Western Warrior is available Tuesdays exclusive for our supporters and subscribers@redicemembers.com or on our locals Red Icetv.locals.com or subscribestar.com slash Red Ice get a membership, check out everything that we do and support the show.

 

 

[2:46:29]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 12/30/2025 = 107)

107 Comments – Latest at top

BeornBeorning
5 hours ago
Great guest!

RestitutorOrbis1028
VerifiedLocals Supporter
2 days ago
Australia was batshit crazy & cruel during Cοvid; I will never forget it. Ontario & British Columbia (Canada) come in close behind.

Soozysuz
Supporter
3 days ago
Also the government are so dumb, they don’t even know they have created this right wing movement. There’s no stopping it when they have forced us into this situation. If they weren’t over controlling fuckheads, we could all be living in peace and enjoying life.

Soozysuz
Supporter
3 days ago
The government are terrified of you guys. After your speech at MFA in August, I had to find out what you were all about, brocade it certainly wasn’t what they were trying to tell us. If been a keen listener ever since. As a woman in my mid 50’s it makes me so happy to see strong young men prepared to do what it takes to take this country back. I grew up in the best times and never imagined we’d be where we are now. Australia is barely recognisable. I really hope we can turn this ship around Hail

6millionbagels
3 days ago
Brilliant interview

Jaymeo1
4 days ago
Tom is the future

Bee1970Something
4 days ago
Israel and their puppets keep causing bullshit and the current so-called leaders all fleece us for this greed

PansophicGothi
4 days ago
Greg Johnson is a normal gay man, and Joel Davis did a live stream with him in 2025. I get the tendency to act like zero tolerance, but that doesn’t really mesh with reality, it’s usually more complicated and nuanced. (Chris Cantwell went off the deep end though.)
1
0

BeornBeorning
5 days ago
“…doing everything we can to keep safe the vibrant multicultural society…” LMAO
1
0

Lueger
6 days ago
41:00 Striker and those around him have no f’g idea about the obnoxiousness of the mohammedans in Europe and everywhere else they exist outside of the US. The Jew-S has traditionally filtered out the above-average to below-average sorts and allowed in only the absolute top-level, unislamic intellectuals. I went to Europe as a convinced opponent of semitism, and learned in Europe that opposition to semitism must include opposition to all semites. Jew and arab alike have an ideology of perpetual innocence, mixed with an inclination to communism and lasciviousness. They are both disgusting and should properly be confined to their deserts, pushed off of the coasts of the eastern Mediterranean.

Vasili1
6 days ago
you may be interested in watching– Jews in Australia 2 – Ernie Rolando Dec 2025 (+ Critical Race Theory) https://www.bitchute.com/video/KbCDmGx8xsOK

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Ah you’re an anti-semite (You said that around 2 hours in). Well I guess that means I should go and protect the real Whites then, the negative blood types (myself inclusive). Jews aren’t the real semites, but if you have all connection with Christ by blood well then we negative blood types deserve better than being annihilated by the jews, directly targeted and abused not only by people on Earth, but wondering why almost all our lives we’re being targeted by demons and fallen angels so much and jews trying to replace us and then also annihilated potentially by neo nazi’s and replaced there too? I’ve cried deeply enough, shed enough blood and sweat. We’ve gone through enough us negative blood types, don’t deserve attacks instead of being cherished and protected and also considering how much we’ve also done, which means none of you would be here otherwise to even be able to fight. Most of us didn’t even know that we were blood of Christ and his ancestors until only a few years ago, even though the jews have known and tried to cover it up all along. I’ve connected with negative blood types the last few years and they’ve all pretty much said the same thing, we’re being hunted more so than anyone else in the world and almost all I spoke to were Christian or I didn’t know and I’ve spoken to quite a few groups. I’m against multiculturalism of all non-Whites with Europeans, Scandinavians (Greenland inclusive) and Whites I don’t know how it’s going to go with you lot not accepting we’re actually the real Whites if that’s how you’re going about it. I’d like an apology at least from the UK people from hating on me throughout school when I was a little girl because they were fucking racist against Polish people and framing Polish people for what the nazi’s or rather the jews actually did. Sick. I think there’s clear reason, negative blood types have to protect our own community worldwide. I might as well go pass on the msg because I don’t need anyone not being loyal to us.

‹ Hide 1 reply
boicotinho2
1 week ago
lmao, “the jews arent the real jews”. what a nonsense
1
1

‹ Hide 2 replies
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
“What a nonsense?” lol Have a look at yourself in the mirror and then you’ll see what real nonsense looks like. If you want to be roasted, mate, I have all day and shit ton load of experience, (no pun intended and frankly it ain’t shit but since you’re so literal worse than an actual autistic then lets go with heap ton load instead). I’ve grown and healed through these time loops like you can’t imagine despite the BS torture I’ve had to endure. You’ll tire out quicker than it takes a cork to blow from a shaken up bottle of cheap sparkling (not even champagne). Jews are not the real line of Christ and his ancestors. Happy? I can’t fucking edit these posts and they allow only 2,000 characters as you well know so it doesn’t let me say everything to a dumbass like you. People with half a brain or holes in it know what I’m saying, you can’t, you’re that retarded? I don’t have time nor energy for shitty connection, do better. Be kind, instead, takes healing. You eating your wild blueberries? (Clearly not).

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
he’s obviously unhinged, pity the poor minded
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Sorry for the many posts but each post only allows 2,000 characters. So it’s not just the demons that need to be killed, it’s also the fallen angels. If we don’t kill the core of the problem, those fallen will just manipulate people on Earth again, get them accepting & loving their demons & doing sick shit like they did at the Colosseum. According to Anthony William attacking family members because they were forced to while the whole stadium was screaming. Plus people doing things like what they are today, today’s style canaanite. Joshua, Saul & David (those negative blood types) killed all these jews that went rancid because God directed them to. This is a battle that’s been going on for thousands of years but for some reason what is God waiting for with the fallen? How is it that our God tells Joshua NKJV 7:10-12 to kill the filth amongst him & won’t be with Joshua unless he does, yet Jesus our God doesn’t kill all the filth amongst his realm & the spiritual. We have to investigate further what’s going on here. Either way, the audiobook is: “Angels, Demons and Spiritual Tools,” you can get it on Spotify as well. Takes 7 hours to listen, about 10min a day to do the excersizes even if you don’t believe in them. For me when I even just started listening to it, my life situation improved & I became more confident against the spiritual & celestial realms that house these filth demons. You can bet all the sick jews are turned demon in the afterlife because satan comes to collect if God’s angels don’t come to collect you. The afterlife, is another battle, unfortunately & I don’t know about you lot, but I’m already exhausted by the immense full blown attacks I’ve already received in a frickin’ time loop that I was forced to endure repeats of as well, still am. I know a lot, don’t know too much about how to get myself out of a time loop, any Jesus Christ following Christians know? Anyway, otherwise I’m going to have to wait until Christ comes & that could mean we lost.

‹ Hide 1 reply
RestitutorOrbis1028
VerifiedLocals Supporter
2 days ago
On a social-media post, if you cannot write a concise comment within a few sentences, you need to fundamentally reconsider your language & communication skills. Honestly, trying to provide constructive criticism. Do your best to shoot for a few sentences, one paragraph. Cheers

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
1:30:00 thereabouts, none of the flying cars & the proper architecture & all of us getting along won’t happen until the demons in the spiritual realm are killed & everyone needs to be taking THAT seriously. Unfortunately I have to quote Anthony William even though that audiobook was actually half me because he took my personal previous situation where I was screaming at my v2k attackers & crying hysterically from the heat & the spike protein stabs within my body & senses. I didn’t realise at that point that they had given it to all the cows as well (so everyone is vaccinated unfortunately, need to eat their wild blueberries & all the powders from Christian brand Vimergy, can also get it from the floweroflife.com website to clean that nano out). They just keep dumping nano at us daily, in the air, it’s part of the chemtrails, it’s in the water, dairy, you’re around vaccinated you literally can’t get away from it. You can minimise your exposure though & clean it out daily so you’re as close to God as possible, not as close to those cia agents & their ai as possible. At that part of the loop a few years ago Russia & America (jews) were threatening the world with drones that could kill you upon impact using facial recognition & were using them at Ukraine border. Poland had a machine to zap them upon impact, I realised checkmate wasn’t really checkmate, I screamed what he is saying now in the audiobook made one loop after it happened. He really should have co-authored me but he supports some jews, apparently the better ones & I refuse all jews. That situation you can truly know how evil these satanists are when they abuse their power & think no one is around to help you or that you can’t help yourself, which is all I had. Not only that but demons power the energy for these satanists, people have said that the reason Clintons are so powerful is because they used sex magic to attach demons to their soul this was a purposeful intent not always does sex magic do this.

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
You neo nazi’s may also be interested to know, that Hitler actually had his own hypnotist and he was using him throughout all the crowd speeches he did. It clearly was greatly effective, how do you think mesmeric techniques from Anton who used to live in Germany in the 1800s ended up actually freeing Germany from them jews? Biggest mistake Hitler made was going after Poland though. That was dumb. Jesus Christ knows all about hypnosis and mesmerism. It was used over 5,000 years ago as a healing modality. The history of Hypnosis and where it’s going in each country is actually kind of fascinating. In other words, you don’t attack God’s children!

‹ Hide 2 replies
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
loving your uneducated comments.

boicotinho2
1 week ago
Jewsus Christ is just jewish mythology!
0
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
At 21min, JimmyDee on YT (hope I spelt that right) he’s got about 10k YT following, one one of his videos he mentions this video & this person & showing a photo of him getting painted with red paint and the video from TV. He also mentioned, ‘so all of a sudden this guy has no more head split’ I can’t remember exactly the quote, but it was along those lines, I thought that was a really good point. Young guy, mixed race, hates muslims as well & love the fact he calls out the jews in everyone of his videos. VizzGitt on YT is also good at that too but less often, but they don’t seem to have a lot of subs, I don’t know if it’s brainwashed people that don’t follow them or it’s the jews that are punishing them with algorithms. At 1 point I thought Mel Gibson was bad when I started getting attacked heavily with the microwave weapons attacked while cleansing, because I wondered why they were using mesmerism to try and hypnotise me so much that I had to block the signals with scalar healing aka longitudinal hz frequency, which does block negative frequencies from the 5g & breaks hypnosis without being killed because CIA they do that kill switch within you. I’m pretty proud I actually was 1st to figure it out but it was also because of that lady that researched and developed scalar wave healing. I did add her I forgot her name now but you can still find her on YT. But CIA with the nano were using what I sensed as Mel’s voice or something it was the sound behind his voice it was like oh it’s so tough to explain, like water has sound waves, when you speak it’s the subconscious waves that come through from the neurotransmitters of the heart, I could pick up on that because I did Heart Math. CIA Ai betrayed Mel and all of us they used his energy without his consent & used it to attack me with. I’m pretty sure they also tried with the strongest hypnotists in the world. Pauline Hanson hates muslims and ching chongs, but supports the satanists, the false jews. It’s nuts.
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
As a professional from what I call “unhypnotist” which was my own technique when I asked God what I needed to do with my life decades ago and I had to unravel what the TV and the radio signals were doing to peoples brains by helping them lead them into their subconscious so they could clean it up with Jesus Christ’s guidance. If only I could help more people, but I’ve been attacked to not unhypnotise people from the media, I think more people in Australia would have be woken up and not woke. I also know what the CIA have done. I was trained by the same man (who is Aussie) that taught Mel Gibson and traveled to America to teach him. So yes, Mel Gibson is in fact also a Hypnotist and we were taught the strongest method from Anthon Mesmer, his techniques are still used in Germany to get rid of varicose veins. They don’t give you pain medication nor local anesthetic, they use rapid inductions to destabilise the pain immediately and within a few seconds make a few slits and rip out the varicose vein, apparently it’s painless. I have recently found you can heal varicose veins naturally with wild foods. Anyway the reason I mention hypnosis is because CIA hypnotised a guy after many days and convinced him to kill himself by walking out a high story window, don’t remember if it was 2nd or 3rd level building. All those shooters are heavily hypnotised, CIA also know mesmerism but they’re not as good as us here in Western Australia, the most amount of mesmerists in the world, let alone hypnotists. What they teach you in uni alongside Psychology is a watered down version of hypnosis there are no rapid inductions. It’s the Ericksonian technique developed by an American, only useful once a person is actually in hypnosis because it’s using visual imagery to clear out old patterns, your brain responds well with visual imagery. Fucking Wong. She’s probably a clone made in China then sent to be a handler to the government leader. I wonder when she’ll start falling apart.

corella64
1 week ago
Rumble censorship blocks personal views
on these issues.
1
0

corella64
1 week ago
One indian is too many indians in Australia.
1
0

BBrand89
1 week ago
Bikes grape kids

corella64
1 week ago
Globalism, mass immigration and multiculturalism is -anti-white- majority. The enemy from within and without. Bad DNA admixed with northern european DNA for future generations is deranged, corrupt, debased, degenerate etc. Defend you DNA stock, quality over quantity!

corella64
1 week ago
Both semitic tribes, jewish and islamic and their extended religious nationalities at war with white european majority nations, and winning at Bondi.

TVR_
1 week ago
Hail Thomas Sewell

scootera
1 week ago
Great Conversation

katana17
1 week ago
[Red Ice TV – Bondi Beach Shooting & White Australia with Thomas Sewell – Dec 17, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/12/18/red-ice-tv-bondi-beach-shooting-white-australia-with-thomas-sewell-dec-17-2025-transcript/ [In this live stream video Thomas Sewell from White Australia joins Henrik to talk about the effort to take back Australia, the Bondi Beach shooting and the political aspirations of White Australia party. Points discussed include: The shooting occurred during a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach on December 14th [2025]. The attackers were a father and son duo, one of whom was born in Australia to an Indian father and Italian mother. The son had converted to Islam and received religious training; he was also linked to ISIS. The attackers allegedly targeted jews specifically, though many others were injured. “We’re surprised it doesn’t happen more often,” said Sewell, referencing Muslim rhetoric in Australia. Sewell says Muslims in gyms and job sites often express extreme anti-Jewish views. He criticises conspiracy theories suggesting the attack was staged or fake. “Sometimes Muslims just kill people,” dismissing Mossad-related theories. He says the jewish event was not random—it was advertised and attended by prominent Zionists. Arsen Ostrovsky, an Israeli human rights lawyer, was present at the event. Sewell notes Ostrovsky arrived in Australia weeks earlier to “fight anti-semitism.” The father was killed during the attack; the son was recently brought out of a coma. Some Aussies tried to intervene and were mistakenly targeted by police. Sewell contrasts police response to White nationalists vs. Muslim terrorists. “If you’re a White nationalist, they pull the gun out on you immediately.” Female police officers on the scene were ineffective and had “mental breakdowns.” Sewell describes the police as cowardly and unprepared for real violence. He criticises the Australian government for focusing on “Nazis” instead of real threat. And more, …
1
0

Delete
Spectroscopy_
1 week ago
anyone know what happend to stormfront?

JWMickleMusic
VerifiedSupporter
1 week ago
another fantastic interview. Hail Victory! \\\

Henry000
1 week ago
Excellent interview. All Australian Whites should vote for his party. They have nothing left to lose.
2
0

J0hnConn0r
1 week ago
Shadow banning comments fucking pathetic
2
0

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
The islanders brought over to Queensland in the old days for the sugar cutting were the Kanakas.

Winstein_Synagoguehill
1 week ago
Eric Striker is such a brain dead shut in. Every serious Nationalist considers him a fool.
1
0

Anglojim4
1 week ago
This is not a criticism. It was a great discussion and Thomas Sewell is a highly intelligent leader with some great policies. But perhaps he could curb using lots of swear words. I understand it’s the way blokes talk. But Mr Sewell is the leader of a party, which has great potential in Australia, and could attract votes from a wide range of men and women from different age groups

‹ Hide 2 replies
PansophicGothi
4 days ago
Typically I agree with you (re: Joe Rogan etc), but it does seem to be that’s just how normal people in Australia talk, different culture. You might as well try to get them to stop using the ridiculous accent.

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
i expect tom will be more tactful when he’s dealing with politicians and the like. yes he could be more statesman like , however we are lucky to have him.

Seppl88
1 week ago
Jews and Fags are at the centre of all evil. Himmler understood the Fag problem.
2
0

katana17
just now
[Heinrich Himmler – Speech about Homosexuality to the SS Group Leaders – Feb 18, 1937 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2014/10/30/heinrich-himmler-on-homosexuality/

Delete
nemo74
1 week ago
Nobody gives a fuck about what you don’t like. If people have theories, people have theories fucking deal with it dummy. Typical Australian. Wanna stifle freedom of speech. Guess you shouldn’t have given up your guns. Eh mate?

‹ Hide 2 replies
RealPolitiko
1 week ago
Go suck off some muslims u retard

whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
up the meds laddie, sounds like you need it.

kingogondo1
Verified
1 week ago
Fantastic show. Every minute.

BattleAxe77
1 week ago
Yet its the Jews who love Cultural Marxism and mass migration. As long as they can have their Jewish state Israel
1
0

SkoobyDew
1 week ago
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡁⠶⠡⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⢄⠰⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠈⠃⣃⠐⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠂⠀⡀⢨⣄⣠⡰⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠁⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⡀⡀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣯⠖⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⠿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣉⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡐⠀⠁⠀⢀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⡀⡔⠃⣻⣿⣿⣿⣏⣤⣴⡧⠤⠚⠀⠀⠀⣻⡷⠀⢰⡐⠘⣔⡐⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣰⡀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⢀⣼⣽⣿⣟⠀⠀⠙⣂⢆⠐⢂⢰⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⢼⢣⡟⣮⠖⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⢿⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠆⢈⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠸⣿⢸⢁⠰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡹⠀⡻⠛⠿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⡖⢡⠊⠔⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣾⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡑⠢⣉⠒⠀⠀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠻⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠣⠔⠀⠀⠀⠱⠀⠠⣐⣒⡂⠄⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⡞⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⢀⣠⣴⡶⠒⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠄⠡⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣚⡽⣖⠙⠿⣷⣶⣤⣤ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣷⡙⣿⠿⣿⡼⣟⣏⣃⠀⣀⣀⣀⡰⡀⠀⠀⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢹⡆⢅⡀⠻⡿⢿⣿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡳⢎⡉⢿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡟⠿⠡⠑⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢈⠄⠹⢠⠂⠄⠀⢹⣿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⡵⣍⡂⠍⠉⠁⠀⠈⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢂⠁⡍⠌⢂⠀⠩ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⠃⣼⢸⣿⣿⣿⣟⡻⠛⢵⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⡀⠄⢂⠐⣈⠢⡈⠄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣾⣳⣟⢠⣿⠊⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣷⣀⡌⠚⢰⠃⠐⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢂⠷⠈⡠⢇⢈⠖⡡⢫ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⡄⢿⣁⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣴⣥⠂⠁⣀⣠⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⠀⠀⢁⡞⣓⠄⢣⡈⢲⢅⠹ ⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠘⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠰⢬⡑⣮⠔⡘⡡⢎⡘ ⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣙⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⡀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⠐⣭⠀⣠⠄⠌⡒⡬⢷⣗⢶⡡⣟⡘ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣮⠛⡗⠀⠀⠂⢹⣿⣿⣿⡥⡛⢤⡌⠻⢿⣿⣿⠁⢠⢖⡳⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⢎⠄⣗⠢⢵⣜⣷⣿⣭⡟⣤⠋ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡋⢿⡿⢰⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⣷⡿⠀⠙⣼⣆⠀⠙⠁⢠⠔⡤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢘⠰⠃⣜⡲⣿⣿⡷⡺⣵⢉ ⣿⣿⡉⢿⡏⠀⡇⢸⠃⢸⠀⠀⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢻⣄⠈⣷⢿⢆⠀⠒⡠⢂⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⢹⢠⠿⠵⣿⣚⢗⡧⠏ ⣿⢿⣧⣘⣇⠀⡇⠀⠀⣿⠄⠈⢿⡅⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢨⢕⡸⢿⣿⢶⣄⠳⡌⢌⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⢘⢞⠭⢓⠋⡋⠇⣃ YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED
3
0

WheresMySpaceship
1 week ago
While those men should never have been in your country. You don’t hate them enough! If only anti-white zionists and jews died… (you know the people who all stick together but try to destroy you if you do, want you dead, humiliated, broke, powerless, and to genocide anyone non-jewish) Uh… Nothing of value was lost. The only issue is any government crack down. Disagree? (Check my logic versus yours. Understand I’m not the one with the mental illness… You are!)

Garbear78
Supporter
1 week ago
white power!!
1
0

Brandonkane
Verified
1 week ago
Holy Crap you’re on Rumble? This is amazing. I haven’t been able to find you guys in so long
2
0

Tmizzle89
1 week ago
HAIL THOMAS SEWELL

BurningCross
Supporter
1 week ago
we can have guns. Just nothing practical for self defense and you have to beg the police and get formal training and get licensed and then the cops can raid your house whenever they want. cope more ozzies

boicotinho2
1 week ago
Not super convinced about their arguments from 21:00 onwards. I find it too much of a cohencidence that this propaganda lawyer was also an october 7 survivor
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
RealPolitiko
1 week ago
You’re most likely brown since you’re one of those retards who always say muslims can never do nothing wrong, it’s always someone else’s fault. Like Thomas said: jews and muslims both need to get out of our White countries.
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
He’s not the first one to say it though.
1
0

J_Cheever_Loophole
1 week ago
Don’t forget, tiny Rhodesia was fighting, and winning, against both Chinese backed communist terrorists, and USSR backed communist terrorists….what made them lose the war and hand the country back to the blacks was American embargoes and the US bullying the UK into cutting them off too, just as they did with Cuba and more recently Venezuela, as my Great Aunt who lived there said, “You can’t win a war without bombs and bullets” And just a few years later, the US bullied the rest of the world into supporting embargoes against South Africa and the exact same thing happened…forced to had over control to the blacks and to watch as their country was utterly destroyed….and many forget, South Africa was a nuclear power until then too… So it is the US you need to watch, especially their money lenders!. They knew they had to destroy those countries or else white men would flee there from Europe and the US… Now there is no white homeland, none at all….but if there is one positive note it is that a tiny military, well trained and well motivated.can win against incredible odds…just beware the USA…

Mogus1488
Supporter
1 week ago
Good stream but I did want to correct that the isis flag is banned still in Australia
1
0

BradC1988
1 week ago
Hail Thomas Sewell, Hail NSN, Hail Victory!! o///
1
0

nicestgoy
1 week ago
sign up whiteaus
1
0

GreenGladeAryan
1 week ago
Hall the Leader o/
1
0

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Chris Minns is insane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKMbdLd-jwg&t=584s

Fawkes2
1 week ago
DEPORT ALL SEMITES
3
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Excuse you, you mean deport all jews.
1
0

MonThirteen
1 week ago
Thank you so much Henrik, you’re an awesome interviewer. You let Thomas cook. His last interview on jake shields was almost unwatchable. Dan constantly butting in, trying to steer topics to what he wanted. This interview was a breath of fresh air. When you have a genius on its best to listen and not ask stupid questions. Hail o/ FREE JOEL DAVIS.
9
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
boicotinho2
1 week ago
Both inteviews was good. IMO the one with Shields and Belzerian wad even better than this one

‹ Hide 1 reply
MonThirteen
1 week ago
Belzerian is like a newbie in comparison to Thomas. He kept interrupting and steering the conversation to his limited knowledge. When you have Thomas on a show, it’s time to shut up and learn.

renunciate
Supporter+
1 week ago
You’re still “fit & proper” Mr Sewel.
1
0

BroadcastAdvisor
1 week ago
Lot a talk. No solutions. What’s the SOLUTION for AMERICA? Keep waiting to hear something … The Titanic isn’t going to fix itself. We need a new Republic and in the new Republic we’d need ( among many things ), a 4th branch of gov’t. 2 citizens PER official – their only job being watch them for any signs of treason. Pay = $100k + a year. Their reports go to a CIA ( Citizens Intelligence Agency ), for a deeper look. IF treason’s found they get a military tribunal. This, in our enlarged all white CSA II. There ya go. A great topic for an upcoming show.
1
0

yogafiretate
Supporter
1 week ago
The commonwealth bank market cap is 250b not 1.3t bro is retarded

Goat_Moag
1 week ago
Speaking of banners. No foreign loyalties amendment. “No person holding foreign loyalties, foreign passports, or oaths to foreign actors, shall hold political office or government position, or other positions of trust.” Rough draft of course. Something of such importance certainly needs consideration, though the rough draft seems pretty good. The journey being more important than the destination (as far as getting an amendment passed, not that that would be a bad thing). The journey being to build a movement / coalition, and a banner to get behind.
2
0

Bentley2177
1 week ago
Absolutely everything Tom speaks on is 100% correct!
7
0

Bigboy6669
1 week ago
hail
4
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
54:36 Propaganda!! How about our governments boot all the non natives out
1
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
52:32 It’s disgusting. How dare the globalists fuck up the West like this
1
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
100 years on the native whites are slowly waking up and will no longer be bludgeoned by the Holocaust and carrying Hitlers efforts
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
correct i was bludgeoned for over 60 years of allie propaganda,however thanks to people like david irving i have seen the way forward. go the NSN

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
29:41 This is ridiculous!! Why is the West Infiltrated with non natives!! Whites only in power!!

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
27:20 Virtue signaling about Anti-semetism. I and I am sure the native white Australians dont care about Anti-semetism!!! I care about white genocide and replacement
1
0

AdamUnsalted
1 week ago
The more Whites notice bad Jewish behavior, the more the Jews open the gates for brown immigration.
6
0

DJTriumph
Supporter
1 week ago
great show keep up the good fight, stay positive
4
0

Megawatts80
VerifiedSupporter+
1 week ago
the best thing about Tom is that not only is he highly intelligent, but he’s also the leader of White Australia because he’s the strongest, and there’s some very strong members of his org, and he is still the strongest. a true icon.
14
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
PansophicGothi
4 days ago
So NSN functions like Orks ?

› Show 1 reply
whitehonkymonkey
3 days ago
the establishment must be looking in and thinking how they can eliminate tom from the system as he’s gone and done a lot of study,which makes him dangerous to the system . i hope the NSN have plenty more like him as back up used to find tom too radical, however the system has gone so radical the other way,that national socialism is the only position left to us. keep up the good work tom your a credit to the whiteman.

Seppl88
1 week ago
I am in Sydney; Bondi is 20 km away. It is a Jewish Ghetto; they like to ghettoize themselves. The media and government are frantic but only in pushing the line that “anti-semitism” is to blame and we need more gun control. Not citing the obvious that multi-culturalism is violent, also these Indian shooters had legal guns. They want to bring in even harsher hate speech laws to curb the White Nationalists’ criticism of Jewish power. This was about payback for Gaza and nothing else. It is unfortunate that this achieved nothing, it has created more sympathy for Jews and has not hurt ZOG, only will punish white interests. Resist the tyranny, Tom is the man with a plan!
19
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Make Bondi jew free again!
1
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
They can’t call themselves semites, they don’t have the blood type, proven by the shroud and Dr Serafini the Italian Cardiologist.

‹ Hide 1 reply
mcdawggg
1 week ago
No one cares. Just get all the foreigners out of our country.
1
0

Globalist_Juice
1 week ago
Always good to hear from Tom, thank you Henrik.
9
0

beautifulphallus
1 week ago
Harold Holt was Prime Minister in the late 1960s

CoomernistFaggot
1 week ago
White is right.
32
0

Knights_Messiah
1 week ago
Tighten gun laws.. Seems almost like Islam did the attack with this consequence in mind. Screw over the white natives even more
4
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
AdamUnsalted
1 week ago
Islam is the broom of israel.
3
0

Callisterz
1 week ago
Keep pushing your limits!
8
0

Malthus
1 week ago
BONDI BEACH JEWISH MOSSAD BS EXPOSED! https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ok14qM0D4Qpz
6
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
DJTriumph
Supporter
1 week ago
Bitchute is banned in the UK
1
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
Malthus
1 week ago
ProtonVPN
0
1

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Use Tor Browser? It’s pretty much just a VPN but free.

Downunderdickhead
Supporter
1 week ago
Good on ya Tom! Only bloke who can pull the country out of this mess! AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE
46
0

‹ Hide 5 replies
liebedich
Supporter
1 week ago
Oi! Oi! Oi!
7
0

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Excuse you, I’m doing a pretty good job too, you all wouldn’t be here without me!

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Besides the fact that you choose a jew, a muslim, a serpent, a grey alien, pick a time and date and weapon of choice was my idea from about 4 years ago. That wasn’t any of the neo nazi’s ideas so if they don’t also credit me they’re in trouble!

HeartcloudTeaTreeKoala
1 week ago
Also you wouldn’t know that cia as in the satanists as in the jews have access to our timelines, if it wasn’t for me speaking out about it you’d all still be wasting your time in arrears you can’t make a dent in because the serpents with the jews will just amend the timeline and outcome back to the way they want it, they can’t do everything though. Through these timelines I’ve watched an American brotherhood kill the jews in America and it got reverted, I also saw other attacks and that also got reverted which Is why I said in the first place that it needs to be a worldwide thing at the same time and then we have to factor in the time travelers and their armies, because they’ll be at us too because having control of the future is a very powerful thing. If I wasn’t speaking out and made it by cleansing in this time loop and a seer from God none of you would know when to attack or where, and certainly not know when. If you want your enemy not to know your next move, you’ve got to cleanse with wild blueberries, why do you think I’m so onto that at the moment hmmm? Go get all the powders from Vimergy. Even jew Harari told you the luciferinase is a weapon “surveillance under the skin” is what he said in an interview it’s still up on YT. No I don’t take drugs, nor drink nor smoke and I’ve been cleansing heavily for more than 5 years with wild foods and even before that with dry cleansing and water fasting from 6yo. I’ve also been screened by 4 professionals and I’m no way delusional, I don’t have bi polar nor any of those kinds of things, I’m not schizophrenic either although I have had the v2k attacks which falsely say it’s schizo when it’s a weapon. Amy Holem has already proven this with her inventions to pick up on the radio signals, the micro waves, that means yes the microwaves and longitudinal waves that are coming at us. Actually I’m not sure if she picks up on the longitudinal because they go passed all devices including your own bones, it’s the make-up of us.

BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Oi!
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, please tell me that it’s not fucked! Chat, are we cooked? Are we good or?

 

Blair Cottrell: Give us some feedback, guys. How are we coming through? Are we loud and clear? Are we glitchy? Give us some feedback.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let us know if you good. Are we cooked?

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently we’re all good, man!

 

Joel Davis: Put a TND in the chat if it sounds good. If I see at least 10 TNDs, then I’ll know that we’re good to go. Okay, I’m seeing the TND’s flying. Okay. I don’t know what happened there. It was like something.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does TND mean? What’s TND?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, don’t even., … Yeah, right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Totally Nice Day. It’s a totally nice day for The Joel and Blair Show. And we are here to discuss what has been another interesting week in politics.

 

Finally, a story that we can discuss on the show in which we’re not actually personally involved. The Charlie Kirk assassination! There’s a lot of interesting aspects to this, a lot to break down and we’re going to talk about that. It is the 14th of September [2025]. Apologies to the audience for the weird tech issue. It wasn’t my fucking fault though! Streamyard, what are you doing? You know, I pay my Stream Yard subscription and this is it. But I guess, that’s what happens, like sometimes shit just glitches out. It is what it is.

 

But yeah, Blair, I guess there’s a lot of dimensions to this on the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we can get into, I think a bit later, like the theories around the shooter and all the rest of it. But the official story, it is quite blatantly clear what the FBI is saying and what has been released, the media, is that this is an Antifa tranny fucker who has shot Charlie Kirk in a political assassination.

 

And the way that I interpret this, and I think the take home message from this, taking it at face value for the broader public, is this Charlie Kirk, his whole thing was that he was the “debate me bro” conservative. He had like, he was literally shot under his banner above his head said, “Prove me wrong”. Charlie Kirk would go to college campuses around America and he would openly debate anyone and everyone on his views. And he’s a very kind of personable, true, chill, friendly kind of guy. He’s not particularly militant, quite moderate in his views, although lately he’d been saying things that are a little bit more edgy or controversial, but nevertheless pretty moderate by the standards of the conservative movement. Kind of smack bang in the centre of where the conservative movement is at. And he was shot in the neck for it. It doesn’t matter how much you try to present yourself as a upstanding, reasonable conservative in a suit and tie and impress upon your political opposition that you’re not one of those Nazis, you’re not one of those fascists, to the Left we’re all fascists! And they want us all dead!

 

And what this signifies to me, because liberalism is based on this premise of what Schmitt* calls like “discussionism”, this idea that you’re going to have this gentleman’s agreement, which is basically what the Constitution is and what liberal, democratic norms are we going to have freedom of speech, you’re going to have elections. We’re going to have this peaceful and open and amicable debate within society where we’re all part of the same national family, national community, but we’re going to have a good faith debate and discussion and competition in the free, an open marketplace of ideas and through the political process that everyone’s allowed to participate in, apparently to determine which direction the government is going to go and what direction policy is going to go. And that’s kind of how it’s solved, right?

 

[* The Schmittian friend-enemy concept, articulated by Carl Schmitt in his work “The Concept of the Political,” posits that the essence of politics is defined by the distinction between friends and enemies. This framework suggests that political actions and identities are fundamentally shaped by conflicts and antagonisms, emphasising that politics arises when these distinctions become pronounced. Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) was a conservative German legal, constitutional, and political theorist. Schmitt is often considered to be one of the most important critics of liberalism, Parliamentary democracy, and liberal cosmopolitanism. But the value and significance of Schmitt’s work is subject to controversy, mainly due to his intellectual support for and active involvement with National Socialism.]

 

And so it’s built on this gentleman’s agreement between the Left and the Right that they won’t resort to violence, that they won’t break the contract. This gentleman’s agreement has been utterly trashed by the Left. The Left has no respect for it. You know, for decades upon decades, the predominance of political violence has come from the Left, but also they’re trying to the predominance of the attacks upon freedom of speech have come from the Left. They’re trying to put us in jail, literally, for expressing nationalist views here in Australia. They’re doing it in the United States to a lesser extent because the First Amendment.

 

But all across Europe, the Hate Speech laws are even worse than Australia, basically, across Western Europe. The Left have basically taken over media, taken over educational institutions, are trying to propagate their ideology through bureaucratic authoritarian means upon the next generation, criminalise dissent and ultimately kill people for even moderate forms of dissent. They’ve pushed the Overton Window so far-Left that to them, even a moderate conservative is an evil fascist Nazi that deserves to be shot just for existing in public and brutally executed in front of the whole world and his wife and children.

 

And so what this needs to be for the Right is a reality check that this conservative, Right liberal premise that we can somehow debate the Left and sit down and have a gentlemanly exchange of ideas and gentlemanly competition for political power, and that we can ultimately share a political process and a country with organised Leftism. I think it should be a reality check that this is a total delusion. If the Left are going to shoot you and call you a fascist anyway, you might as well become one.

 

[06:25]

 

What is fascism? Fascism is basically more or less seizing control of the state and locking the Left out of the political process, saying:

 

“All right, we’re not going to play this fucking game anymore. If it’s either your dictatorship or ours. If we’re going to have a Left-wing authoritarianism or Right-wing authoritarianism, well, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism. We’re going to be the ones running the state, and we’re going to put all your leadership in jail and we’re going to criminalise your political ideology and we’re just going to just basically take control and assert our vision for the country!”

 

And that’s what the Right needs to come to terms with, is that this illusion of liberal democracy needs to come to an end. And it’s time to pick a side. And they call people like myself, like yourself, extremists. But all we are is ahead of the curve. All we did was just kind of like think through to the logical conclusion, to the realisation that sharing a political process with the Left is ultimately untenable, on a long enough timeline, eventually it’ll become impossible to do so, and then eventually a decision will have to be made. Are we going to have a Left-wing or Right-wing dictatorship? A Left-wing or Right-wing authoritarianism? And we need to choose very firmly Right-wing authoritarianism.

 

And if conservatives keep clinging to these liberal, democratic ideals that are based on faulty premises and ultimately are just capitulation to an assertive authoritarian Left that wants us all dead for opposing them in the political arena, then ultimately conservatism is just a suicide pact! Ultimately conservatism is going out there with a friendly face, trying to shake hands and be amicable with an enemy that’s just going to pull a gun out and shoot you in the face and execute you. So what is conservatism then? Just a suicidal cowardice! It doesn’t make any sense anymore.

 

The fact that Charlie Kirk would be executed like this in front of the whole world should be this reality check. And I think a lot of conservatives have been very radicalised by the experience. Not just seeing the execution, but seeing the reaction of Leftists online, of Left-wing media justifying and even celebrating what transpired and realizing that this isn’t just a difference in ideas. This is actually an existential struggle between two fundamentally incompatible worldviews. And so that’s how I think we should look at it, and that’s how I think we should frame it to conservatives.

 

This isn’t particularly radicalising to people that are already on the far-Right, that are already on our side, because we expect this kind of thing. It doesn’t surprise us. But it has been shocking to conservatives, and it should shock them into realizing that rather than punching Right and complaining about how we’re bad optics and making them look mean. But they need to get me. And they need to start working with us and deploying us. The same organisation that executed Charlie Kirk was the organisation that Tom Sewell is currently in jail for fighting a few weeks ago. It’s the same organisation. These anti-fascists, they don’t care if you’re really fascist or not. They’re coming for everyone. And the only solution to that is to actually get fascist and fight back!

 

So that’s my primary take. But I’ll throw the floor to you, Blair, because I know you have a lot of thoughts and feelings on the matter.

 

Blair Cottrell: It sounds to me, Joel Davis, like you haven’t acknowledged your guilt yet! Don’t you know that White people throughout all of history have trampled the world and created suffering, have enslaved people, have colonised nations! All historical suffering is our fault! And we need to suffer now to pay for all of that. We don’t deserve any rights. We don’t deserve any dignity. White people deserve no freedom. What happened to Charlie Kirk, it’s deserved. We all deserve that because we’re the evil capitalist race, the ruling class. Down with us! Acknowledge your guilt! [chuckling]

 

That’s literally what some people believe, isn’t it? And that’s the ideology which motivated Charlie Kirk’s assassin. I don’t even like to use the term “assassin”. It’s too cool. You know what I mean? Like, he’s just a murderer. He’s a coward, rat murderer!

 

This happened while I was streaming with Mark Collett. I got up early in the morning, started streaming. About halfway through, we heard the news that Charlie Kirk had been shot. And my first question to Mark is:

 

“Who’s Charlie Kirk? I’m just a humble Australian down here.”

 

And when he explained that he’s that guy who sits at university and debates people, I’m like:

 

“I know that guy!”

 

And I discovered that a lot of people I know who aren’t even that political, not only knew Charlie Kirk, knew who he was, but they watched him quite frequently and they were really devastated! They were shocked and sickened by what happened to him. Especially being able to actually watch the shooting over and over again! Clips of him bleeding out from the neck like that. That was absolutely brutal, man! Brutal! What a coward! The person who shot him from a distance. The one guy who was willing to just sit there and open dialogue, you know, And I’m seeing all across the Internet, Leftists trying to justify and celebrate this open murder, this cowardly, pathetic murder of a moderate conservative debater. You know what they’re saying? They’re saying:

 

“He wasn’t even that moderate. He said ‘mean things’ about black people on this occasion, and he said mean things about women on this occasion, and he also said some mean things about transvestites on this other occasion. And so that’s why he was shot! He wasn’t a moderate at all!”

 

So that’s subjective. First of all, that you believe something he said was nasty for some reason. But would that justifies the man getting shot in the neck? Of course it doesn’t. It’s just a disgusting, …

 

[12:32]

 

We’re up. We’re up against a vicious enemy! An enemy that, as I outlined in the beginning of my statement, with a bit of sarcasm, actually believes that White people are to blame for all historical suffering and need to be crushed under heel! Need to be punished in every way thinkable for their for the sins of their ancestors! Not only do these people serve as politicians, judges, police officers, Professors in the universities, but they are teaching the next generation, hoodwinking the minds of young people.

 

I mean, did you see that guy? There was a guy who walked through some American universities after Kirk’s killing and was just asking students what they thought about Kirk’s assassination. And they all thought it was good. They’re all saying:

 

“Yeah, I don’t really care. He was a bad person. He said mean things, didn’t like his opinion. So good, I’m glad!”

 

Basically, is what they were saying. Look, I’m very angry about it in my heart, because I have empathy. I’m not a Leftist psychopath! I can actually put myself in somebody else’s position and imagine what they’re going through, what they’re thinking. And I don’t just dehumanise people as “Nazi fascist racists”. Like, to me, Charlie Kirk was a person. I don’t even know what he stood for necessarily, because I never watched him that much, but I knew that he was willing to debate with people. He was willing to talk it, talk it out. And it just sickens me that we live in a system which brands people as villains and tries to justify their public execution. They’re just cowardly murder for the sake of this White guilt, White people must be punished sort of ideology, because that’s what’s motivating it, as I said.

 

Look, one thought I had on it, which I’ll wrap up my point with, is governments around the world, Western governments, they’ve been both occupied and tricked! They’re tricked into chasing a decoy enemy. They’ve made an enemy out of the far-Right, the extremist threat of the so-called “far-Right”, while far-Left anti-fascists, one of them at least, just shot someone in public, shot him in the neck, executed him because he was far-Right. So the same people the government are chasing are victims of that kind of terrorism.

 

And do you know any anti-fascists, anyone watching this? Do you know any far-Left anti-fascists that are banned from entering certain countries, raided by police on no evidence, taken to court for speech crimes, on government watch lists as potential national security threats? I know plenty of people on the far-Right, the so-called “far-Right”, the class of heinous villain that we apparently belong to. I know plenty of people on our side of politics who fall into all of those categories and suffer those kind of limitations on their existence. Don’t know anyone, don’t know any anti-fascists that experience any of that.

 

So I do believe that through clever language, pressure and subversive ideological tactics, far-Left anti-fascists have hoodwinked western governments, occupied and hoodwinked Leftist governments. So state resources are now spread out and wasted on so-called far-Right extremism, which is not only not a threat to society, it’s the solution to all of society’s problems! Probably why governments have been hoodwinked into chasing it as the primary threat by the people who actually are the primary threat to society.

 

I won’t say anything else about that for now unless something else occurs to me. But thanks for joining us tonight guys. It’s been an absolute hectic week or two with the arrest of Tom Sewell, the August 31st rallies in Australia, everything that transpired after that during and after, and then the Charlie Kirk shooting. God, isn’t it just going crazy? It really, it feels like everything is just spiraling into absolute chaos! The Australian government is actually using both the August 31st rallies and Charlie Kirk’s shooting as justification for pushing through a social media ban. They’re saying it’s just for young people at first. That’s how they’ll get it over the line, right?:

 

“Oh, we’re just trying to protect young people. We don’t want young people to see so-called far-Right extremism and political assassinations. And so we’re going to censor the Internet for that reason.”

 

That’s what they’re saying. So just for people under 16. How are they going to tell who’s under 16 and who’s not? Obviously that’s going to create the framework for them to censor the entire Internet or to do their best to block certain websites or content from being accessed by Australian citizens.

 

So the response of the Australian government to people organically rallying to challenge government immigration policy and to a moderate conservative debater being executed in cowardly, sickening fashion by an anti-fascist activist, the response of the Australian government to that is to create a censorship programme to stop us communicating and seeing stuff like that and talking about it on the Internet! To hide that reality! That the fact that is happening to hide that from the Australian people. Which yeah, is just as sickening as the shooting itself in my opinion. But I have more on this. You chime in first and then I’ll continue with what I’ve got to say next.

 

[18:04]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s interesting. I looked at Charlie Kirk’s Twitter and the last tweets that he made were actually about that, what was in America, but she, I think she was an immigrant from Ukraine that had moved to America recently who was stabbed in the neck by that nigger on the train in the US. And that video went very viral because it was just so shocking that she just like sat down on the train, was on her phone and then a nigger was sitting behind her and just decided:

 

“I’m just going to stab this White bitch in the neck and kill her!”

 

And there was four or five black people that were on the train in the seats surrounding it, that looked at it and then just like looked back like they didn’t care while she like bled out to death in front of them. And the black dude walks off like:

 

“I got the White bitch!”

 

You know, it was like an obvious racial hate crime.

 

And the response of non-Whites was not to acknowledge that there’s a problem with anti-White hatred or anything like that. Their response was to say:

 

“Oh you see, like the Right is just trying to like use this to further its agenda of hating blacks.”

 

And then this happened to Charlie Kirk. And the reason why that anti-fascist shot him was probably because Charlie Kirk has made some moderately pro-White takes. Apparently he was fucking a tranny. He had a tranny, well, really boyfriend, but he probably would have called it his “girlfriend” because he’s mentally ill. A mentally ill faggot!

 

But anyway, some of Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric on transgenderism might have motivated it as well. But obviously the fact that Charlie Kirk has said even very moderate, vague, pro-White things like:

 

“That you should be proud to be White, Whiteness is great!”

 

Or things like that, was enough to be classified as a Nazi and therefore deemed worthy of extermination. Brutal execution by the Left! And this has been celebrated by mainstream politicians, mainstream journalists, pundits on the Left. The prevailing sentiment on the political Left is that anyone who says anything even vaguely pro-White deserves to die. And even anyone who says anything vaguely critical of transgenderism deserves to die apparently.

 

We can’t share a political process with these people. We can’t share a country with these people. The most charitable thing that we could do is seize control of the state, implement some kind of dictatorial regime that is able to purge Leftists from every major institution, universities, media, education in general, bureaucracies, what have you, to identify basically the key perpetrators and funders and so on, and neutralise them. And then basically put all of their followers and supporters in massive re-education camps and through massive re-education programs to basically disinfect their mind from this extremist, insane, genocidal ideology against our race. That’s what has happened. Like millions and millions and millions of Whites have been basically brainwashed into a genocidal ideology against their own race!

 

And also tens of millions of immigrants, non-White immigrants, have been brought into our country have also had this genocidal ideology propagated amongst them, and they feed into it and believe in it as well. This is not something that we can just have a discussion, or a debate about. This is not something that we can just have maybe one election cycle, they win, maybe one election cycle, we win. Something radical and totalizing and final needs to be done!

 

And you might say:

 

“Well, that sounds a bit extreme. And I like liberal democracy because my free speech and all this kind of stuff.”

 

Well, you know what, they’re the people that are trying to destroy free speech. They’ve already given up on liberal democracy. You can’t force them to play fair with us. They’ve decided already they don’t want to play fair.

 

So now we have to play for keeps! We can’t play fair with the Left anymore. Right. Maybe 100 years ago in places like in Australia or whatever, you had a more moderate Left-wing that wasn’t genocidal against our race and it was just disputes over economic policy and things like that. And we could have a liberal democracy and it could be relatively stable. We don’t live in that society anymore! We live in a society now where the entire political ideology wants us dead! So it’s just like it’s no longer a tenable solution.

 

A lot of people talked about how all in the Middle East, maybe it was an unwise decision to take out certain dictators because if you give democracy to these Middle Eastern countries then radical Islamists just end up like taking over the government and creating an even worse situation than what previously existed underneath the strongman dictator that kept that population in line. We said:

 

“Oh, that’s what it’s like in the Middle East. They’re not like Westerners.”

 

And it’s, well, it’s becoming like that in the West now. Things have gotten so bad and our enemies have become so extreme that only a strongman dictator can actually solve this. We don’t have the ability to solve it the nice way. You can keep generating, you know, infinite guys in suits that are well spoken that are going to go and debate topics in public and win debates and convince millions of people that White people shouldn’t hate themselves and we should have common sense, immigration Reform or whatever, it doesn’t matter! Antifa is going to show up and try and beat them up or kill them.

 

The Left-wing institutional bureaucracy is going to try and change as many laws as possible to put these people in jail. The enemy is going to try and get our kids in through the educational institutions and, or into their Discord servers or whatever and then infect them with this extremist genocidal ideology, and then deploy them to start committing acts of terrorism like we saw the other day. That’s what’s happening!

 

[24:58]

 

And I’ve seen the conspiracy theories advanced by some people that actually the Mossad killed Charlie Kirk. And this is just like they’re just blaming it on Antifa as like a front or something. But they killed Charlie Kirk because he started moderating too much on Israel.

 

And Charlie Kirk was an Israel shill. Charlie Kirk’s whole career was funded into existence by Israel, basically like Turning Point USA was basically a front of the Israeli government. That’s why he was able to become so successful and prominent in the first place. And in recent months he has been moderating his position somewhat on Israel and people said that’s why Israel took him out, because “they made him, they’ll break” him kind of thing. And it was like a warning to all other shills for Israel that if they step off, step outside of the bounds of what they deem acceptable, they’re next kind of thing. To kind of have a chilling effect on this kind of tendency. We’re seeing particularly on the American Right, but we’re seeing it here in Australia as well for there to be conservative opposition or Right-wing nationalist opposition to Israel becoming increasingly prominent.

 

But I haven’t seen any evidence to support that when it comes to the actual shooting. Like there’s like circumstantial evidence. Like, that Harrison Smith guy from Infowars, like a month before the shooting tweeted out something like:

 

“Charlie Kirk is afraid that Israel will kill him if he goes against them.”

 

There’s like little bits of circumstantial evidence, but there’s no evidence about the actual shooting itself that I’ve seen.

 

Now I’m an open minded guy. I know that Mossad commits shootings. If evidence ends up coming out. You know, if there was some other, if the official story doesn’t check out, if there’s actually an alternative theory and evidence can be presented, then we can look at that and we can revise our take on the subject.

 

But as of right now, I haven’t seen that. So as of right now I’m just going to take the official story at face value because it is entirely plausible that some fucking Antifa lunatic would do something like this. We’ve seen incredible amounts of political violence from the far-Left. And the far-Left all collectively celebrated it and justified it. So they’re still culpable.

 

So insofar as that’s the official story, let’s hold the far-Left accountable because that’s what the official stories seem to support, until we have reason to believe otherwise. Like we as nationalists, yes, Israel is an enemy of ours. So is Antifa! You know, whenever we try and do a political demonstration, or a political activity, Antifa come down and try and engage in violence against us. They engaged in organised violence against the March for Australia rally a few weeks ago. They’ve firebombed Tim Lutz’s house, one of our friends and associates, the Victorian leader of our organisation. And the list goes on! Antifa, always trying to dox our activists, attack our activists. And they’ve embedded themselves in Australian media all over the place to carry out their designs. So if the official story is Antifa’s responsible, I’m going to hold them responsible because Antifa are fucked! They want me dead! They want Blair dead, they want all of you dead that watch this show and sympathize with what we’re doing.

 

So that’s what I have to say about the Mossad theory. I entertained it when the shooting first happened. Like there’s some, okay, let’s explore it, but I haven’t seen good evidence for it. What I have seen good evidence for is that this guy did it. People said:

 

“Oh, it was a professional hit.”

 

Well, looking at the evidence, it was actually only a 200 yard shot. If it was a professional shot., … It wasn’t even the best shot. Because it hit him in the neck, but it kind of ricocheted off the top of, … It looked like he was wearing some kind of bulletproof vest or body armour of some description. And it seemed like it hit him around the collarbone or just below the collarbone area and then ricocheted up into the neck. Obviously he wasn’t aiming for the neck. He probably didn’t even know that he had a bulletproof vest on and was actually aiming for the chest and got lucky.

 

So I don’t know. I don’t think it was. There’s not really any like compelling evidence that it was a professional hit. There were some weird things that happened on the day, like this random jewish guy claiming that he was the shooter immediately and acting weird and so on. But none of that proves that it was Mossad or it was the CIA or all this kind of stuff that I’m seeing online.

 

So you can be open minded, you can entertain those theories, but just asserting that it’s true without evidence, just kind of, it de-legitimizes you, if you’re a public commentator, if you’re just going around asserting that particular groups did things without evidence.

 

So I’m not going to do that I’m going to go:

 

“Okay, well, if we take the official story at face value, it was an act of far-Left terrorism and far-Left terrorism is out of hand!”

 

It’s not like the first act of far-Left terrorism. And Antifa should be declared a terrorist organisation in every Western country. Anyone who funds or contributes to Antifa’s activities should be forced to immediately cease and desist. All of their assets should be taken, they should be criminally prosecuted. People expressing Antifa sympathies in public should basically be made illegal. This is how they want to treat nationalists who don’t engage in this kind of behaviour! You know, we don’t engage in this kind of behaviour, we don’t support it!

 

[30:37]

 

 

And if Antifa came out or elements of the communist left came out and said:

 

“We don’t support political violence, we disavow this in the strongest possible terms.”

 

Then they would at least be able to remove themselves of moral culpability. But name me one Leftist group that has done this? Not one Leftist group has done this, right? If someone who has far-Right sympathies engaged in an act of political terrorism, far-Right groups would say:

 

“Hey, this guy had nothing to do with us. We don’t support violence, we don’t support terrorism!”

 

Because they wouldn’t want to be seen as being supportive of terrorism because of all the consequences that that would ensue and the loss of public support and so on. On the Left, they basically don’t even have to disavow their own acts of terrorism. That’s how fucked the Left is, and also how weak the government is. In the United States apparently the Right is in power, the so-called “Right”. You’ve got Trump and you know, his administration. What are they focusing on right now? They’re focusing on trying to pass new laws to try and take passports of American citizens who criticise Israel, because the First Amendment exists in America they can’t just make criticising Israel illegal or something. So then they have to use an indirect means of saying:

 

“Well if you criticise Israel, we’re going to cancel your passport. So you can never travel internationally.”

 

To have like a chilling effect on discourse in America around Israel. That’s what their focus is on. Rather than on going after organised political terrorists that directly attacked Charlie Kirk, which supposedly is one of Trump’s top supporters.

 

You know, they had Air Force Two taking his body and it was this big political hoo ha and he’s personally friends with the whole administration. Imagine if there was an act of Right-wing terrorism, their reaction would probably be stronger. This has been pathetic and weak!

 

So the so-called Right is in power. They don’t see this as a political opportunity to go after our enemies because, and this is the fundamental problem with fucking conservatives. All they care about is doing the bidding of Israel, seemingly. But that’s it.

 

Like when it comes to actually fighting the Left and actually fulfilling their mandate, there’s a million and one excuses and you know, it’s a cuck fest. So it’s disappointing.

 

I wouldn’t expect like our Left-wing government down here to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, but how come no one on the Right is saying it? Why isn’t Pauline Hanson or even like people in the Liberal Party coming out and saying:

 

“Antifa needs to be listed as a terrorist organisation.”

 

That just engaged in organised violence on the streets here in Australia. Two weekends out of the last three weekends in a row, they’re shooting political commentators in the neck and executing them in America. This is a serious problem. Where’s that kind of narrative? No, instead you’ve got like literal Antifa members going on the ABC, justifying the shooting of Charlie Kirk basically, and then also calling for us to be classified as terrorists! And we haven’t actually committed even an iota of political violence other than defending ourselves from them attacking us.

 

So the Right is pathetic! This conservative establishment is fucking pathetic! The politicians in these parties and so on. And the pressure needs to come on! And this is why the people are ultimately going to come more and more to the radical National Socialist movement in this country and they’re going to move to the far-Right more and more around the world, because conservatives are too weak to actually take on the Left. They’re too weak to actually take on their own ostensible enemy. We are the only ones radical enough and clear thinking enough and earnest enough and true enough to say and propose actions that are going to be necessary to convince, confront this threat.

 

And so that to me is how we need to be framing this. That is how we’re going to win people over to our side is by calling this out, calling out the weakness of the conservative response.

 

I saw Trump being interviewed about this like two days after, or a day after:

 

“How are you feeling about the Charlie Kirk thing?”

 

And he just like changed the subject to building a new ballroom in the White House and that he’s feeling great. It’s like he doesn’t give a fuck! It’s like even if he doesn’t give a fuck, like in his heart I don’t really care about that. But why does he not see this as, look at this incredible political opportunity to classify Antifa, a group that is engaged in organised violence in America how many times like the BLM riots Antifa were playing a leading role in that, like burning down the whole country when Trump was president last time. They engaged in organised armed violence against ICE recently in the US over basically trying to stop ICE from deporting Mexicans from America because you know, they’re such anti-White pieces of shit that you can’t even deport illegal immigrants without them trying to like engage in like terrorism against the state. That’s insane!

 

Imagine if like the Right armed up and started like engaging in like terrorism under the Biden administration, like street terrorism and like shooting leading Left-wing, you know, commentators like at like public events and like taking up arms against the government. Would they just be like:

 

“Eh, whatever, it’s sad or it’s a problem.”

 

And just move on with their agenda? No, they would like literally go for the jugular against far-Right groups. So it really is pathetic!

 

But that’s what we’re dealing with. That’s why fascism is necessary! That’s why National Socialism is necessary! This suit and tie conservative, let’s just talk about it, cuck fest, let’s be the bigger person. It doesn’t cut it! It’s not going to fucking work! It’s ultimately it’s just going to lose and lose and lose and lose due to its own inherent weaknesses.

 

 

[36:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I sit with my back to the wall. Do you do that? If I’m at a restaurant waiting for a train, chances are some radical Leftist is going to try to stab me, or something worse. They’re very unlikely to confront me directly for obvious reasons. And so chances are I’ll be stabbed in my lifetime by one of these maniacs. So I sit with my back to the wall! Because I understand that communism and anti-fascism, they’re not real debatable opinions, not in the way that we are raised to believe constitutes a real opinion. Like anti-fascism doesn’t debate people, they just try to slander and kill people because they don’t represent an ideology, a real ideology. They only disguise themselves as an ideology to take advantage of liberalism, or a liberal society. But they’re always just hostile subversives. Hostile subversives trying to force themselves into a place of absolute authority.

 

They want to use that authority then to abolish liberalism, crush and enslave you! That’s what they want and they think it’s justified because of the perspective that White people have created suffering in the world and that’s what they deserve. This is plain faced what these people actually fucking are and what they believe! This is it! They’re cruel, petulant, ruthless enemies of our country and our entire civilisation around the world!

 

And they won’t be happy until we’re all gone. We’re all genocided and dead! They think that’s the solution to all the world’s problems because they think all the world’s problems have been caused by White people. They boil it down to something that embarrassingly simplistic, and they think they’re smart for doing that.

 

They want to kill me. They want to kill you. If you’re watching this and you’re even Right leaning, they want to kill you too. And they demonstrated that by just killing Charlie Kirk, the one who was trying to sit down and talk to him.

 

And yeah, they should be listed as a terror organisation right now! I suppose it’s still possible that some moves could be made in that direction once all the facts are known. I know that the FBI is apparently chasing far-Left groups who are associated with the shooter. And it might be possible, not might be possible, might be the case that at least one far-Left group called, I think the “Social Democrats of America” or something, I don’t even know. Democratic Socialists, maybe. They may have had prior knowledge. This guy who shot Charlie Kirk may have discussed his plans with them beforehand. They deactivated one of their social media accounts and many people had been seen coming to and from the shooter’s residence leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

 

So what else do I say about this man? I mean, the way I think the way I phrase that just then is as simple as it gets. Anti-fascists are the enemies of society. They want to kill White people and they don’t want us to exist in the future. They think everything bad that ever happened in history is our fault and they want to punish us for it. It’s pretty simple.

 

And the majority of them are actually White, which is really creepy! It’s creepy how effective propaganda can turn an entire race of people, or at least a fraction of a race of people against themselves through some sort of guilt complex. It hoodwinks you into thinking that all of human history is as simple as White people being evil and needing to be punished for it. And there are literally people who believe that and make it their day job to harass and execute White people as punishment for this perceived historical injustice. It’s really weird to me. It’s weird to me that they could even watch me say this and they still won’t understand how fucking retarded they are!

 

It’s bizarre that we have human beings, we live amongst human beings that are that simple and retarded! I struggle to wrap my head around the small capacity for thinking and understanding that’s natural to these people. I suppose the reason they exist is dysgenics, is they’re so genetically like retarded! They’re just like not very well bred and not very well raised and they haven’t experienced very good standard of living, or a stereotypical, a standard mother, father relationship as they grew up. And they have all sorts of internal mental problems as a result of that. I don’t know what it is exactly. It’s probably a complex of reasons why they end up believing nonsense!

 

But isn’t it funny, Joel, how they try to obfuscate the simplicity of their worldview by acting like they’re really educated and smart and over intellectualizing all of these weird socialist economic policies and pretending that they’re just against capitalism, pretending that they’re just against corporatism and they’re just against the big businesses and the people who are trying to exploit the worker. Workers of the World Unite! But it’s all fucking bullshit!

 

But it’s all a cover for the simplistic race hate, the anti-White race hate that is always driving them! They over intellectualise garbage and hide their true intentions behind slogans that everyone can get behind. But what they really want is to exterminate White people and punish White people for perceived historical sins. And what else can you say about it? That’s the situation that we’re living with in the world today.

 

 

I’m on a government watch list and banned from all social media. I get my bank accounts closed, I get raided by police on no evidence. I have been taken to court for hate speech, not necessarily because of anything I’ve said or done, but because I’m White and because I’m an effective critic of this anti-White ideology.

 

At the very least if you’re not going to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, which they are and always fucking have been, at the very least you could stop the subversive ideology which leads young White people to anti-fascism. You can stop that being taught in schools. I went to a university. I was only there for like three weeks. I wanted to see if I could study anything without being identified and removed because of who I am.

 

[42:38]

 

And it turns out I wasn’t allowed to study anything in Australia without being identified and removed because of who I am. Students ended up finding out who I was within about three or four weeks. And they said “they felt threatened”. And the course leader told me that I could no longer continue to study in that course.

 

But in only in the three or four weeks that I spent in that classroom. There were several quizzes introduced by an Aboriginal activist. We had to get the answers to the quizzes correct. And they consisted of:

 

“How many poor innocent Aboriginals the White British colonials had slaughtered upon first landing on the shores of Australia during the time of the settlement of the First Fleet?”

 

And it was made to seem as though all the settlement of Australia consisted of was evil White people coming to this land and massacring innocent Aboriginals who did nothing wrong. And they’re trying to rewrite the establishment of Australia as an evil, genocidal campaign conducted by White people against poor innocent natives. In only three weeks of trying to sit through a course on psychology, I was exposed to that multiple times! And some of the students actually argued against the teacher. They said:

 

“How is this relevant to psychology?”

 

And she argued back at them first, that:

 

“It’s relevant because you’re going to have Aboriginal clients and you need to understand their trauma and the sorts of association your race or how they’re going to associate your race with having committed or put them through that trauma. And so you need to know how to deal with that.”

 

And also:

 

“If you had a problem with it, maybe this wasn’t the course for you?”

 

What she was saying was:

 

“If you have a problem with anything that I’m saying right now, if you have a problem with this subversive, hostile, ideological campaign, then you get out of this psychology course, you racist fks!”

 

That’s basically what she said. [chuckling]

 

So this is taught in schools all the time! The foundational ideology, the groundwork for anti-fascist terrorism is anti-White ideology. It’s White people committed all these crimes and need to suffer, need to be punished. No rights for White people! No dignity for White people, no future for White people! That’s what motivates anti-fascism. That’s what just got Charlie Kirk shot in the neck. And it’s being taught in schools still right now, state schools, university. There are activist professors still spreading this shit to this day. So at the very least that needs to stop.

 

Then once that stops, maybe we can talk about removing these professors and removing these people from the police force and government institutions and courts and every other institution that matters to prevent this kind of sick ideology being taught to people. Not only talk to people, but used to leverage the entire state apparatus against its own citizens.

 

Anyway, yeah, I think I’ve had my rant. But do you do the same thing? Well, usually on the streams, we don’t have such long individual segments. We allow each other to talk a little bit more and we chime in and that kind of thing.

 

So maybe for the rest of the stream we can make it more like that. And I’ll ask you, Joel, do you sit with your back to the wall? Do you understand your own peril [chuckling] or the peril that you’re in as a result of your opinions?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, but at the same time I’m pretty relaxed because I’m not too worried about if:

 

“Oh, if some random anti-fascist sees me when I’m out.”

 

You know, I would say thousands of people, many thousands of people over the years have come up to me in public from recognizing me, from like, obviously seeing me on the Internet or in the newspapers or on the news or whatever. And basically every single time, I can’t think of even one instance when it wasn’t for a positive reason.

 

Maybe like one or two instances where it was negative. And they didn’t even come up to me directly. They basically, in both instances, they went up to the security guards of a bar I was drinking at and then I tried to explain to them that I’m a neo-Nazi, I need to be kicked out of the bar, for basically having political opinions and drinking beer at their establishment. And the security guards just looked kind of confused both times and then didn’t do anything.

 

So that’s it. Because these people are like individually pathetic losers. They need have an opportunity to get organised to engage in violence because they don’t have the capability to like, just like stand a bang, you know. There isn’t really like stand and bangers out there.

 

However, going out, you know, drinking or whatever, countless times I’ve ended up getting into fights with non-Whites, not because they know who I am, they have no idea who I am. Just because they violent and hateful towards White people and have low impulse control. So honestly, the threats in the public come more from the things that we’re actually talking about rather than who we are. Like just basically being a White guy in public in Sydney or Melbourne, going out on the piss, because there’s a lot of lunatics out there.

 

Blair Cottrell: The black guy on the bus that stabbed that Ukrainian girl, they’re saying that he’s just mentally ill. But what do you think? Because other people think that he was racially motivated, they’re trying to pass it off, …

 

[48:14]

 

Joel Davis: He was racially motivated. He said, literally on the video, he said:

 

“I just got that White bitch!”

 

And he’s surrounded by, like, five other black passengers on the train. He didn’t stab any of you know, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s also feminist culture. It’s the fault of feminist culture. Like, why was this tiny White Ukrainian girl on her own at night on a bus traveling around? She was probably working some bullshit job to try to survive because feminism has created a culture where that’s what women have to do they have to travel around on their own, and they have to try to work to survive on their own because they don’t get married, and they don’t have men in their life to support them.

 

So, again, this is just a combination of racial prejudice and feminism!

 

Joel Davis: And then she’s from Ukraine. So in Ukraine, they don’t really have that many blacks. So she didn’t grow up, … She grew up in a relatively homogenous country and then goes to New York.

 

 

And if you grew up in New York you know, never to relax around blacks, to keep your wits about you when you take the subway or whatever. But because I guess she was a foreigner, I guess she was naive, and yes, I mean, it’s just a great tragedy. Seems like a beautiful young girl. I mean, what a horrible thing. It’s just completely senseless violence. But these two instances are two, you know, potent expressions of White genocide. People say:

 

“Oh, Charlie Kirk, he took hundreds of millions of shekels from the jews to be one of their top butt goys and advance a Containment Zionist message.”

 

And that’s true. That’s true! I don’t want to shit too much on the guy who just got brutally shot in front of his kids. That is true!

 

However, the reason why that happened, the motivation of why that happened, was of a genocidal hatred towards our race. And even if you’re one of these people who believe that it was a Mossad hit, that’s also motivated by a genocidal hatred towards our race. So whatever you believe that the Mossad did it and covered it up, or Antifa did it, either way, it was an act of White genocide. The motivation is whether it was jews or communists, our two principal enemies since time immemorial, they hate us and want to kill us and want to genocide our people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me play devil’s advocate to you, Joel. Are you saying that people should have the right to make misogynistic racist, sexist and transphobic comments in public, thereby encouraging hate in our society amongst the youth at university campuses? This guy is spreading hateful ideology! This is a proponent of hate! Should this be allowed? Shouldn’t this be met with some sort of resistance?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that itself is promoting hate.

 

Like, obviously everyone who’s justifying the murder of Charlie Kirk is themselves promoting hate! They’re promoting hatred of White people. They’re promoting hatred of conservatives or nationalists or whatever. So.

 

Blair Cottrell: But do you seriously think, do you seriously think for a second, right, for when you look at this for what it is, this is a man sitting there saying words. He’s just saying words with a microphone. And other people who are interested in the words he’s saying, or maybe a little conflicted about what he’s saying, they’re crowding around him to exchange some more words.

 

Then there’s someone with a rifle who shoots a bullet through the guy’s neck! The guy who’s saying words, a bullet through his neck, exploding his arteries and killing him almost instantly, right? But the words being spoken are considered more hateful than that bullet! That’s more dangerous to society. I suppose when you’ve got a society built on words are considered just as just as much of a national threat as bullets. And that’s what it feels like, the bullshit that I’m seeing all around the Internet. That’s what it feels like they’re trying to sell people. As though the words this guy spoke, the words Charlie Kirk spoke, justified a bullet going through his neck. Because the words were just as dangerous, if not more dangerous than that bullet.

 

What sort of shit are you trying to hide? What sort of bullshit society are you trying to prop up when words to your system, are just as or more dangerous than bullets? Like, ask yourself that, right? Ask yourself to try to get to the bottom of this bullshit!

 

But I don’t know, man! Are we going to keep talking about this? Because I keep seeing. I’ll be honest with you. I keep seeing him being shot in my mind. I keep seeing the footage that I’ve seen. And it just makes me really angry! It makes me sick and angry. I’m very frustrated by it. I know that we needed to talk about it, but, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, good. You should be frustrated and angry by it. Should make people angry. Because anger is a gift from the gods to motivate us to do what needs to be done. The only response, only valid response to this is organising and building a political movement that can seize control of the government and bring this entire ideology down of Leftism, that can eradicate it entirely from our society.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who can do that?

 

[53:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: That’s the only solution. We cannot share countries with these people and with these ideas, these genocidal ideas being institutionalised and normalised, directed at us! It’s existentially not possible. If this is allowed to continue, it’s going to keep getting worse, it’s going to keep escalating, and eventually we’re going to be put into camps, we’re going to be put into Gulags. It might not happen next year or the year after, but that’s where this is going. That’s where it ends up. Because as you said:

 

“Oh, well, isn’t it hateful the ideas that we put forward, and therefore, doesn’t that justify violence?”

 

But it’s a total mirror image. For them our wanting to continue existing as a people is unacceptable. And for us, them wanting to continue exist as a political movement has to be fundamentally unacceptable, too. And ultimately it’s going to be us or them! Either we seize the state and eradicate them, or they continue or complete the project of seizing the state and eradicate us. That’s where this all goes. And you can say:

 

“Oh, that’s an extreme message!”

 

Or whatever, but it’s the fucking truth! And I had not heard a single argument that is adequate against it, because if you just follow these things through to their logical conclusion, that’s where it’s going. And that’s why the Right has to get fascist. People say, and I’m just using this in a loose sense, but when you say:

 

“Oh, why are you talking about Hitler and why are you advocating for National Socialism? This going to alienate the normies. You know, if you just presented yourself as a nationalist conservative and wore a suit and played down any, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, then they’ll shoot you., …

 

Joel Davis: Then you would appeal to more people. But at the same time, you would completely prevent yourself from actually promoting the idea that’ll win.

 

The idea that will win is the radical idea of actually using the state to crush our enemies. Anything less than that is not going to work. It’s unacceptable! You know, the conservatives win more elections than the Left, but then when they get in power, they don’t do anything. They’re fundamentally weak. They’re hamstrung by their own ideas. Trump is in power right now! We just discussed. He won’t go after Antifa. He won’t go after the far-Left. He won’t use this to actually, politically, advance.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why not? Why won’t he do that?

 

[Because Trump, like the rest of them is a stooge for Orgjew, that controls both parties and uses political divide as political theatre for the masses – K]

 

Joel Davis: Because then everyone would call him a fascist!

 

Blair Cottrell: Who cares! It’s a word! Fascist is a word. And they call everyone that. So who cares?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Well that’s exactly. Just be a fascist! Go:

 

“Yep, fuck you! I am a fascist. Time to go to prison libtards. Time to go to prison commies!”

 

Blair Cottrell: When the choice is to be a fascist or get shot, what are you going to choose?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Exactly! So that’s where this is.

 

But of course when it comes to Israel, all of a sudden he can be a fascist, all of a sudden, you know, which just really kind of exposes the bullshit of this whole scheme.

 

Another thing that I wanted to discuss though as well is its kind of related to this. You know, you see a lot of Right-wing objections. They say:

 

“When you say that you sound like a Leftist, being authoritarian is Leftist. You know, National Socialist, isn’t socialism Leftism?”

 

And you hear this kind of stuff. And they say:

 

“Well, if you’re truly Right-wing, you want freedom and liberal democracy and blah blah, blah!”

 

No! Yeah, like in a liberal democracy that’s functional, the right side is conservative, the left side is liberal, whatever.

 

But we don’t live in a functional liberal democracy. We live in a dysfunctional liberal democracy against an authoritarian Left. So we then have to mutate into a form that can compete and defeat the Left.

 

And the other side to this as well is that there is an alliance, a long established alliance between capitalism and Marxism against us! Against nationalists. We talked about this on the show before, many times. These were the two forces that made an alliance to destroy National Socialism and fascism in Europe. And these two forces still work in tandem today. The people who control international finance, the big corporations, they are in bed with this ideology.

 

You know, previously communists used to oppose themselves to the capitalists on a certain level, but this is long gone. Obviously if you talk to Leftists, they’ll express a whole series of anti-capitalist opinions. But in practice, ultimately their objective is to fight fascism far more than it is to fight capitalism. They critique capitalism academically, but when they actually mobilise in the street and engage in violence, it is against, quote, unquote, “fascism”. That’s the number one objective.

 

When it comes to the capitalist elite. They care more about fighting so-called “fascism” or racism or bigotry or whatever than they care about holding the socialist movement back. Because ultimately the social values of these two sides are basically equivalent. They agree on White genocide, they agree on transgenderism, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They agree on feminism and so on. And that’s actually what’s more important.

 

For us as National Socialists or what have you on the radical Right, for us, we don’t want to destroy capitalism for the express purpose of making everybody equal. What we want to do is we want to free our nations from the grip of international finance and this international clique of which there’s some homegrown elements of businessmen and financiers that have no loyalty to our nation and ultimately have loyalty to globalism and to a social programme of engineering, to genocide our race. That is what we’re opposing and we’re trying to fix.

 

Blair Cottrell: But let me know, would you eliminate private enterprise altogether or would you still encourage that to a certain degree?

 

Joel Davis: National Socialists never did that they never eliminated private enterprise.

 

[1:00:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically in a nutshell, you just stop, like foreign subversives, foreign interests, hostile people, …

 

Joel Davis: Take control of the financial system, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Lobbying from, like buying your media companies and lobbying your political institutions. Right, that’s what you stop.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! All National Socialism means is putting the interests of the nation first. It’s not this like libertarian ideology where the free market must be totally open. No, the national interest must come first. And it is in the national interest of people to be able to start their own businesses and own their own, you know, private property and so on. So that is maintained.

 

But also you need to have a certain amount of, … It needs to be balanced. There needs to be the state has to have power to intervene in the economy to ensure that the national interest is perpetuated.

 

So it’s a balancing. National Socialism is actually quite moderate when it comes to economic questions. But what it’s about is, it’s not about economically left versus economically right. We shouldn’t be defining Left and Right in terms of economics because the fundamental question is one of values. Before economics, humans are not economic entities. That’s actually a Marxist idea. Before, we are economic units, we are members of a national community. So our culture and our loyalty to one another must come first and foremost. That’s what National Socialism is about, getting the priorities correct.

 

And so when we come along, we basically are saying, before you define politics in economic terms, it’s actually a Leftist idea. We define politics in earlier terms. But National Socialists defend hierarchy. That’s why they’re considered far-Right. That’s why the Left understands National Socialists to be the far-Right and fascists to be the far-Right. They don’t recognise us as Leftists. They know that we’re on the other side. They fear us more than they fear you conservatives or libertarians. So clearly if the Left fears us the most, we’re their true enemy.

 

So this is just a ridiculous positing by these conservative elements.

 

When you look at the actual social values of these conservatives, they will be anti-racist just like the Left. They will be pro-gay marriage, just like the Left. They might even be pro-trans a lot of them. They basically adopt all the same social values as the Left does, but maybe a little bit less more moderate.

 

And then they go:

 

“We want low taxes, therefore we’re the true Right-wingers!”

 

Or something. It’s fucking ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, all socialism means is the group before the individual. That’s all it means, the group before the individual. What differentiates National Socialism from the Left is the perspective of what the group is. See the Left see the group as humanity and all of humanity being united against evil White devils. That’s the Left’s version of socialism. They pretend it’s about working class unity against capitalism, but that’s not actually what they believe. They’re kind of just borrowing old school communist literature.

 

And as I said, they over intellectualise their anti-White race hate. What the Left actually believe is uniting all peoples of the world against evil White devils! So to them the group is anyone and everyone, including White people, against White people! So you know, simple us versus them dynamic, simple common enemy and simple propaganda used to unite everyone against that common enemy.

 

But the kind of socialism, insofar as how it pertains to National Socialism, the group becomes the nation. And nation means race. It means a specific type of people, a specific ethnicity. So National Socialism could be understood as racial socialism. So like putting the interests of a specific ethnic group at the heart of everything you’re doing. It comes before the interests of the individual.

 

Joel Davis: And the key criticism of the National Socialists made of capitalism was not people owning their own businesses or owning their own homes or anything like that they supported that. Their primary criticism was of finance, of organised finance, of debt slavery. They wanted to liberate Germans from debt slavery! They didn’t want you stuck paying a mortgage to a bank the rest of your life. Because they understood that banks, because banks create money.

 

When you go to a bank and you get a credit card or you get a home loan, well, people don’t understand this. I say it a lot because a lot of people don’t understand this. The bank literally creates that money out of nothing. The bank isn’t a storehouse of money that previously exists. It creates money out of nothing and it expects you to pay it back out at interest. It’s a giant rort! The way the financial system is structured is a giant rort! It’s a parasitic rort! The banks, they don’t actually build anything. They don’t contribute anything. True value comes from productivity, from people who actually do a hard day’s work doing something productive in the economy. Banking is literally just moving numbers around in a computer system.

 

Okay, so like it does require a little bit of administrative work, but the exorbitant profits they make are far in excess of the actual value that is being created in that practice.

 

So that’s the criticism. National Socialists want to liberate the people from debt slavery by taking control of the financial system and eliminating usury from the system, which then liberates more wealth for the people and to ultimately to spur on economic development. That’s why when National Socialists came to power in Germany, there was what they called an “economic miracle.” Because they liberated the people from debt slavery. And immediately the German nation began advancing economically very quickly.

 

It was radically impoverished nation when the National Socialist took power in 1933, unemployment was like over 25%. The country was a mess. Within six years, within a year basically, they had full employment. And within six years Germany was so powerful it turned into like an industrial powerhouse that can compete with any nation on the planet. And it required basically the whole rest of the world to unite against it to defeat it in a six year World War. That doesn’t happen unless you have an incredible economic theory to advance the nation.

 

And that’s why the forces that rule us want to demonise National Socialism. Not just because they want to genocide our race, but they also don’t want nations realizing what Hitler and the National Socialists realised, which is that they can liberate basically how to liberate your nation from these parasitic international financial forces that the whole world is enslaved.

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not as complicated as having this genius economic theory. You basically just have to remove criminal elements and enemies to your country who are exploiting your country. Because having bad standards of living or just bad social situation generally is not a consequence of just people being unproductive or some sort of erroneous economic policy. People are unproductive and the economy is in turmoil because of all the corruption. Because people are exploiting circumstances to their own benefit. And if, like I said, if people are proud of themselves and they have a good reason to work hard, then productivity will increase and the economy kind of heals itself, especially if the corrupt criminal elements are removed from the economic process altogether.

 

Joel Davis: But what fundamentally, what I’m saying is that the financial system is fundamentally parasitic how it’s designed.

 

Blair Cottrell: So like, yeah, I’m not disputing that what I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: The whole structure of our economy here in Australia is just basically built off debt slavery. It’s getting you into [word unclear] for the rest of your life when you’re basically paying rent to a bank to live in your own home.

 

Blair Cottrell: What I’m trying to say, what I was getting at is one of the things preventing a nationalistic revolution is the importation of foreign labour force to essentially prevent the country from spiraling into Weimar conditions. Because Australia would become so broken, so poor that people would vote for a revolutionary government. But in order to prop up the existing economy, the existing workforce needs to be replaced with as much foreign labour as possible and as fast as possible.

 

So to keep this system going, I think that’s the major difference between pre-World War II Germany and Australia right now! Australia would basically fall into a similar state of economic chaos, but because they’re able to just like keep replacing the traditional Australian working class with people who just accept worse conditions, live in smaller spaces, work for less, work longer hours for less, that kind of thing, then it kind of prevents things from getting bad enough that people will vote in that revolutionary government that will actually fix the problem, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s just kicking the can down the road.

 

Blair Cottrell: It is, but it isn’t because if it leads to us failing to maintain our existence, then it’s not kicking the can down the road. It’s solving the problem that international capital currently has with White people. That is White people wanting a good amount of living space, White people wanting to be able to actually own property. That’s decent standard, decent standard of living. White people wanting rights and benefits and all that kind of stuff that we were raised to believe we should have.

 

Basically they’re standing in the way of international capital producing an effective slave class, or a slave race! I think that is the, at the heart of all conspiracies, that there’s a small network of very wealthy, very powerful people that are trying to breed a slave race! Which is going to be a combination of like Indian and Chinese and black people. It’s going to produce the perfect kind of low IQ subclass people that will never be intelligent enough to actually overthrow the government because they’ll never have a solid, meaningful identity. And to do away with the existing nations of the world the irritating White people who are irritating for reasons I just listed then that I think that is at the heart of all the greatest conspiracies in the world. The breeding of a slave race through coercion and force.

 

Joel Davis: Basically, you could say that, like capitalism and communism were like two jewish enslavement strategies.

 

Because as we’ve talked about on the show, I think some time ago, Werner Sombart’s Jews and Modern Capitalism*, where it’s like one of the best books ever written on the history of capitalism by one of the greatest economic historians ever! And he kind of painstakingly goes through the history of the beginnings of capitalism and how jews played a leading role basically in kind of reshaping European political and economic life through the period before and just after the Industrial Revolution. And capitalism basically is jewish!

 

[* https://archive.org/details/jewsandmodernca00sombgoog]

 

I’m not going to go into a whole diatribe about that text and I’m going to save it for another day, but I have done that on a previous episode.

 

But also, obviously, Karl Marx was a jew, and jews were instrumental in the development of Marxist ideology and the Bolsheviks. Jews are massively over-represented, etc, etc. Everyone knows this.

 

So then what happened with the rise of National Socialism was basically Europeans and fascism as well to a lesser extent, Europeans come up with a solution, a way to break free of both these forms of jewish enslavement. Then what has happened since World War II, and these two jewish enslavement machines essentially allying with one another to defeat National Socialism was we then moved from simply jews attempting to enslave Whites, whether it be enslave them through false promises of liberation. They sell you capitalism as:

 

“Oh goy, you’re on the free market. You get to choose where you want to work. You get to choose what you buy and sell. And so ultimately you’re within a free system!”

 

And obviously communism sells itself to you as it’s freeing you from the bondage of capitalism, freeing the worker from the bondage of the bourgeoisie. And so they’re kind of pseudo liberations that are really like forms of enslavement as we could see, in how they actually manifest in practice rather than in theory.

 

But then after World War II, where it became clear that the White man couldn’t be held down by these enslavement ideologies. Then it became necessary to genocide and replace Whites. It was no longer adequate to build a kind of communist dictatorship or build a liberal, democratic capitalist industrial system and just parasitically enslave and extract resources from a White underclass for a jewish elite.

 

Then what became necessary was gutting them entirely because now they couldn’t trust the White man to be a good little goy! Now they real the White man had ideas of his own, overthrew this system and built a third option, National Socialism, that both destroyed Marxism and destroyed kind of usury finance capitalism and liberated the nation from these two systems.

 

And so now what you see is these two systems mutate into genocidal forms. So now finance capitalism mutated into this globalist form which basically generates mass immigration and the liquidation of national cultures and this kind of mongrelisation process across the West. And then Leftism went from being primarily focused upon, kind of economic dimension to basically being an explicit ideology of White genocide. That basically what so-called Cultural Marxism is the idea that:

 

“Well the White working class, we shouldn’t be trying to build a political movement out of it because the White working class are Patriarchal and nationalistic bigots! And so the White working class will just create a fascist movement if they’re allowed to, if they’re left to their own devices. So we have to actively undermine them by spreading feminism and multiculturalism and you know, gay and transing, you know, up as many of their kids as possible and render them politically useless by reducing them to unaffectatious minority with their own women and mental defectives turned against them and so on.”

 

As we see now. So that’s basically how we’ve got into this position. And National Socialism was the solution to the first option.

 

And the second option was basically built as an anti-fascist adaptation of these two systems. Like the reason why capitalism turned into a globalist ideology was to prevent anything resembling nationalism from being regenerated. That if they could just like mix all the populations of the global marketplace together and mix the economies together and make them as complexly interwoven as possible, then there would be no national bodies that could resist this international financial matrix.

 

And again, if they could fundamentally undermine White culture and mongrelize and destroy our kind of core stock as much as possible, eventually the damage would be so great that it would be impossible for us to ever build anything resembling a fascist movement ever again! That’s explicitly what these theorists say, more or less. And I’m obviously taking a bit of interpretive icence, but not that much.

 

So that’s why we believe what we believe and why what we believe fundamentally is the only solution. Because no other political ideology truly confronts these problems.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been a good stream so far. And we’ve got a fair few viewers tonight, probably because we haven’t had a solid stream in a few weeks. I think. I’ve been absent and you know, last week we had some technical issues. I had some technical issues anyway, but thanks everybody for tuning in and thanks for staying with us.

 

We’ve probably got a couple of other subjects to cover before we wrap it up. Joel, I know that we have the whatever they were there was like some Australia Unites march, which seems to have just detracted from the stop immigration message that took place a day or two ago, I think we can get into that a little bit. And we’ve also got a bit of an update on Tom Sewell’s situation in the Victorian courts.

 

But what do you reckon about the Australia Unites marches or rallies? Did you see any footage?

 

Joel Davis: Let’s talk about Sewell in court first and then I’ll pull that up. So I’m going to pull up a couple videos to show the difference between the two marches, at least in Melbourne.

 

Blair Cottrell: But as far as I know what I’ve been told, I’ve been flat out with work personally this week. So I haven’t had a lot of time because you can actually watch a lot of Tom Sewell’s legal proceedings through video link, I think. And I have a couple of mates who have been doing that and filling me in on what’s been happening. He was found guilty of intimidating a police officer for talking about or discussing some personal details regarding that police officer on this stream, I believe. On The Joel and Blair Show last year.

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if you remember the full context, but I remember the context and this, by the way, is unrelated to the recent arrest. He just happened to be in court fighting this other charge when he was arrested in relation to what happened on August 31st. And Tom was found guilty of this, but he was only given 200 hours community service. So I guess it’s not that big of a deal, all things considered because there’s no custodial sentence and the real fight is ahead of him with this August 31st stuff like the assault charges and so on relating to that day.

 

But basically, people might remember we did two, what we called “Fuck Off We’re Full” rallies. We had a big Fuck Off We’re Full banner last year. The rallies were counter-protests against, … There was basically communists in Melbourne, had and around the country. But in Melbourne was where we did these rallies. They had organised a whole series of subcontinental and Middle Eastern people who were so-called refugees and wanted basically permanent visas to stay in Australia to basically protest out the front of the Department of Home affairs and demand permanent visas, as if they’re just entitled to permanent visas because they say so.

 

And as we went down to counter-protesters twice, once originally, and then when they basically had their big hundred days of doing this permanent Visa encampment thing, they did a big rally, and we went in counter-protest at their big subsequent rally. At that event, people might remember, I got pepper sprayed in the face. I was the only guy there without a mask on for that one. A lot of the boys got pepper sprayed. We still continued the rally anyway and it turned into a success. It was a media success. It was kind of a cool NSN rally.

 

But during the process of that rally, when we first went up to the encampment when we all got pepper sprayed, there was a couple police officers in plain clothes who had batons and they were pretty violent towards some of our members. Nathan Bull actually was hit with the baton multiple times and he kind of just like guarded it with his arm like this. And he had like huge marks down his arm. Obviously he’s a tough boy, so he was okay, but it was just totally unnecessary and senseless violence. And this one, this individual who assaulted Nathan Bull also when we., … Because after we got pepper sprayed, we decided to just go around the corner and go to a different position and just do the rally there anyway. And we just completed the rally regardless.

 

And as we were doing that, this police officer came up to another one of our activists who was just standing there peacefully in the park. He wasn’t engaging in violence or he was just standing there doing the chants and so on, and went to grab at his balaclava and try and rip his balaclava off. And the guy pushed the cop away and step, kind of like took a step back and the cop kind of gave up on the whole idea. That’s assault. Grabbing someone else’s article of clothing is assault.

 

So the police officer assaulted multiples of our members and obviously that second assault was with the intent to pull his balaclava up so that his face would be broadcast on national television as a way to dox him. What Tom said on the stream was like, Tom literally said:

 

“I’m going to look at the law and figure out if this is legal first, and how to do it. But I looked into this guy, I know what his real name is. And in the past when our activists have been assaulted, we’ve made complaints and nothing has come of it. No one cares. Apparently the police are just legally allowed to just assault us for no reason with no accountability.”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, the only recourse I have now is public accountability, so maybe I should say who this police officer is. But I look into the laws around it. So I don’t want to commit a crime like intimidating a police officer or something.”

 

But he kind of speculated that he would, that there had to be some kind of public accountability on this kind of behaviour, because this behaviour can’t go on. Tom was then charged with intimidating a police officer for that. And he was subsequently found guilty. I mean, it’s just a ridiculous judgement! But like I said, he didn’t get a custodial sentence. He got 200 hours community service, which I presume he’ll have to log when he gets out of jail.

 

But you know, considering the more serious things that he’s facing, it’s probably the last thing on his mind now that it’s over, gonna focus on fighting these more serious charges. But it’s just ridiculous that he would be legally charged and then found guilty for something like that, when you really consider the context.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did he actually say for that he was found guilty for, though?

 

Joel Davis: Intimidating a police officer. Because apparently, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I know that but on what basis was he found guilty? What did they claim that he said?

 

Joel Davis: They said that the police officer and the police officer’s wife felt intimidated that Tom Sewell knew their address and was contemplating, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So he said on the stream:

 

“I know their address.”

 

Is that what he said?

 

Joel Davis: Well, he said he looked up the guy and then he’s like, all of his personal information is all over everything. I can see what he’s housed, I can see his wife. He’s like, he didn’t say he was going to release any of that stuff. He just said, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I still kind of I get your perspective, but at the same time I don’t know, I don’t know. That’s a bit sketchy. It’s a bit sketchy to be like:

 

“Hey, I know where this guy lives and I’ve got pictures of his wife.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like, …

 

[1:24:42]

 

Joel Davis: Like what he said that when he looked up who the guy is, the guy himself had pictures of his house and his wife on his social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: So he was trying to say, like, this guy’s just got all of his stuff up on his social media. It’s quite reckless. And he doesn’t want to be held accountable. Maybe he shouldn’t have. That was kind of, I guess, point, but his point. He also said:

 

“I’m not going to put anything out until I look at the law and figure out what to do legally, because I don’t want to break any laws here.”

 

And then he didn’t actually follow it up by doing anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he didn’t share any information.

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: He just said that he has information.

 

Joel Davis: That he knew it. Yeah. That he looked into who this guy was because he thought the public should know that this individual thinks that he’s got the right to just assault political peaceful political activists. That is unlawfully.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was found guilty on those grounds. Specifically. He hasn’t been sentenced to any jail time, but he’s still in jail. That’s because he’s been held on remand for a series of other charges. Remand means the police have convinced a judge that you’re a danger to society, a flight risk, or you’re going to reoffend.

 

And so you’re kept in police custody or state custody up until your court date. You do have more opportunities to apply for bail in the future, but usually you apply every three to six months, especially if you’re appealing a bail application to a higher court. That can take longer than three months, and I believe that’s what he’s trying to do.

 

So how long is Tom in jail for? At this point, no one’s sure. I’m pretty sure he’ll be applying for bail again soon. In the next few months, perhaps. I’m not exactly sure a date. However, what I can tell you is he’s been held on remand because a judge has been convinced that he’s a danger to society. A magistrate accepted that argument from the police prosecution.

 

He has quite a number of charges. He’s facing quite a number of charges as a result of some of his activity on August 31st. And we’ll keep you guys updated. I suppose I’ll keep you guys updated as well on what’s going on. I do know that you can through a certain system available which I didn’t even know about because you know I did some jail time a long time ago, and back then you had to physically write letters into prisoners.

 

But now there’s a system where you can email a prisoner and as long as you confirm and prove your identity to the email prisoner system, you can actually send him a letter that way if you want to. And I know he would appreciate letters. Jail gets very boring. It’s a very boring, mundane place. He’ll do the best he can to keep himself occupied with books but it’s going to be great for him to get letters. I know that he’ll appreciate that.

 

I’ll try to figure out while Joel shows you guys, show you, shows you guys this video that email a prisoner link and I’ll post it in the live chat and maybe we’ll leave it.

 

Joel Davis: I think the White Australia Telegram page, I’ve shared it before. You can find it on their account and you can share it how basically because you need, … You want to write Tom a letter or you want to send him an email, you need to address it to him regardless.

 

So the information on how to do that is on the White Australia Telegram page. So you should just share it on Telegram and people can see it there.

 

But anyway, I want to show everyone a difference. Two videos. This video is in Melbourne on August 31st and for the Stop Immigration Anti-mass immigration March for Australia rally.

 

 

 

See absolutely massive crowd all the way down the street. Just absolutely packed as far as you can see in every direction.

 

Now I’m going to show you the crowd from the September 13. What was it?:

 

“Anti digital ID, government corruption, anti-racist, pro-aboriginal, we’re not Nazis, but we also think maybe a slight reduction in immigration would be good rally!”

 

I’m not kidding! That’s literally what it was. I’ll show you that crowd in Melbourne from last week. Same camera angle. That’s the crowd.

 

 

vv There you go guys. That’s the crowd.

 

Joel Davis: So as you can see, everyone said:

 

“Oh, if the NSN show up to this rally no one will want to come. And you can’t just make a rally against mass immigration and talk about how there’s too many Indians in Australia and how we’ve got to shut down the borders. It’s too extreme, it’s too radical! No one will show up. No one wants that. We need to we need to cuck it out!”

 

So basically the people who said that and who tried to hijack August 31st and turn it into a cuckservative, pro-zionist, pro-aboriginal, anti-racist event, we made sure that they didn’t. And so they held their own event on September 13th to line up with the jewish agent Tommy Robinson’s big anti-immigration rally in London. Which was massive, to be fair. I think they had some estimates a quarter of a million people there. I’ve seen some estimates even more. Looked like a lot of people in London.

 

But to line up with that, they held these all over the country. And the crowds were quite disappointing. I think the largest crowd might have been in Sydney, but it was still only a small fraction of what there was on August 31st.

 

[1:30:29]

 

And also a lot of the people that were there thought that they were there for another March for Australia, fuck immigrants rally. And then when the speeches started, they realised, oh:

 

“Shit! This is cucked!”

 

And they all just left. There’s even footage I saw from Brisbane which only had maybe like one and a half thousand people max, maybe a thousand people show up. Then the organiser got on the stage and did like a half hour speech meandering around, where he spent half the speech talking about how:

 

“The March for Australia was run by Nazis and it’s a psyop to try and divide races and that we need to be united regardless of whether you’re black, White or brown or whatever.”

 

And he started talking about how we need to unite with Muslims and all this kind of stuff. And the crowd started heckling him and getting angry. And they all, more than half the crowd seemed to have walked off by the time he finished speaking.

 

So huge L [loss] for these people that they were all attacking and criticising August 31st. A lot of them were non-White. A lot of them have links with establishment conservative circles. No one’s buying what you’re selling! No one wants what you’re selling. Your politics sucks! It’s not interesting, it’s not dynamic!

 

And what it shows is that controversy sells. The reason why there was a massive turnout on Aug 31 was because the government was condemning it, the media was condemning it. Running stories about how Nazis are involved, running stories about how the organisers have denied the “Holocaust”, or the organisers justified violence during the Cronulla riots, or the organisers are racist or the organisers hate Indians, whatever. That amped it up and that made people want to come!

 

So the people want nationalism, the people want racism! The people don’t want slop conservative garbage! And I feel vindicated that our kind of politics is ascendant. And all the people on the Right that say that we’re horrible and we need to be marginalised and discluded because we’re fringe. Well, actually more people want to come and march with us on the issues that we care about, then want to come and march with you for your garbage. So who’s actually fringe? I think you’re fringe!

 

Blair Cottrell: I already made a post about this on my public Telegram channel. But just to summarize, it just seems like all the we’re getting so many live comments on this show. Appreciate all the support, guys. And I’ll just add the Superchats you guys want to leave. They’ll all be read out at the end.

 

The messages of what was it like stopping racism and digital IDs and, I don’t know, things that are legitimate concerns for people to some degree. It just seemed like an effort to detract from the main source of the problem, which is the government just basically replacing the Australian worker right now with as many people as possible from India. Everyone sees and feels that. And everyone is feeling the impact on the standard of living as a consequence of that immigration policy.

 

And what, like, why can’t that just be addressed for the problem that it is without “racism” and all that kind of stuff flying around? It’s like, I think people are sick of anti-racism. People are sick of it! Because it’s really gay! Anti racism is really weak and gay k, and people are sick of it!

 

So every effort the more conservative types are trying to make to still maintain that more centrist position in order for in order to appeal more to the masses, that time is over now. I understand the urge to do that. I understood it more five years ago than I do now. But you got to adapt and move with the times.

 

And as things become more radical, people are willing to accept more radical positions. And hey, everyone’s actually racist! The people who are accused of the most racism are ironically, the least racist people in the world right now, which is White people. Black people are racist, Asians are racist. Everyone’s racist. It’s a very natural phenomena. It’s pretty normal to be racist. Your baby’s racist when it’s born. It prefers to be around people that it can recognise as similar to its own kinship. So don’t be so scared of that racist bullshit! Don’t be so scared of that word. It’s just a word. It’s just bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: And so all these people online that are like:

 

“Oh, if you have Nazis at your rally and if you say racist stuff, no one’s gonna show up and no one wants to march with you!”

 

All those people that say that shit that are in the conservative online opinion having sphere, they just had their little fucking cuck rally and no one wants to show up to your cuck rally, actually! People want to show up to an Aussie pride rally, actually!

 

Blair Cottrell: Nazi is just a word as well. And Nazi means National Socialist. And the people who represent that position, they don’t believe that any gassing of 6 million people in gas chambers happened. They think that that’s war propaganda. The people who actually represent that opinion, they think that’s all made up! So trying to dehumanise or vilify people as “Nazis” because they want to genocide people, it’s very disingenuous. Government bureaucrats and academics, you know, “leaders” of popular culture, they’re still using that disingenuous argument by deliberately misrepresenting what so-called “Nazis” actually believe in order to make them out to be villains.

 

In reality, they’re all just people. They’re people who believe that the masses have been fed vicious lies about history and they want to tell the truth! Not only do they want to tell the truth, they want to provide solution to the problems this country has. That’s the truth! We’re not dealing with some sort of brutal, horrible monster out there! There’s not Nazi zombies lurking around every corner waiting to eat your brains! This doesn’t. [chuckling] Everyone’s a person with a real opinion except the anti-fascists.

 

The only people who basically are unreasonable, unwilling to debate or open dialogue, and who just want to kill you for the sins of your ancestors. As I’ve already laid out at the beginning of this stream, the far-Left anti-fascists, they’re the only ones that pose a serious threat to your family and to society. Everybody else you’ll find is generally reasonable, especially the so-called racists!

 

Joel Davis: But also all of these people who advance this argument:

 

“Oh, no one likes the Nazis, no one wants to be associated with the Nazis. That’s going to like kill the rally. And we’ve got to distance ourselves from them, …”

 

Pretty much all of them are actually non-White or they have a non-White wife or husband or they’re jewish or they work in the conservative establishment or something. They all have ulterior motives. They’re against nationalism, period! Not just against Nazism, they’re against nationalism and they’re trying to water down the message. They don’t stand for White Australia! They don’t stand for keeping Australia White. They don’t stand for the actual historical Australian people in our interests.

 

And so anti-Nazi is anti-White. Anti Nazi is actually anti-Australia from all of these people, just like it is from the politicians when they attack us. They don’t want to debate us on substance. They basically just want to try and scare you into not associating with us or being afraid to work with us or afraid to be seen supporting us because of the social penalty:

 

“Oh, everyone will freak out and no one wants to hear that message!”

 

And it’s just gaslighting! *

 

[* Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or group causes someone to question their own reality, memories, or perceptions, often leading to confusion, loss of confidence, and dependence on the manipulator. The term originates from the 1938 play (and later film) Gas Light, where a husband deliberately dims the gas lights in their home and then denies it, making his wife doubt her sanity. See Gaslighting in White Glossary.]

 

 

But actually the rally that we showed up to, that we were publicized as supporting and attending and so on was way more successful than their version. So what it shows is actually you need us there! We provide the controversy, we provide the radicalism, we provide the protective shield to keep all of that crap out and keep the actual pure message in! And to the success of August 31 a lot of people that aren’t in the NSN made that possible, but you know, we were an integral element in it because without us there to push all of those forces out, they probably would have had a lot more success in hijacking it, subverting it, watering it down, and then you wouldn’t have a real nationalist rally and instead you would just be given what you were given on September 13th.

 

Basically a whole bunch of anti-racist speeches and cuckservative meandering about digital ID and you know, fucking global warming and how we need to burn more coal and all this like side issue bullshit! We’re being fucking genocided! Our country’s being stolen from us! That is the number one issue. That’s what matters! All this other stuff is secondary.

 

So it was great to see their rally fail. And you know there’s going to be another march for Australia I’m hearing in late October. Interesting to see how that goes.

 

But the big one, the big one is going to be Australia Day! On Australia Day next year, I know March for Australia is going to mobilise full force. We are going to mobilise every nationalist group and organisation, and every nationalist individual in Australia needs to mobilise on Australia Day. We need to flood our cities with Aussies, with Aussie flags and patriotic spirit! I mean take our cities back on Australia Day. Take it back from the communist Aboriginal garbage that has taken it over in recent years, and reassert our national pride and our sovereignty over this country. That is the big one!

 

And I think the success of August 31st and hopefully the continued success of the October 19th rally, I believe, and so on, will help, you know, set the stage for a massive mobilisation on Australia Day. To me, that’s the big one! Because if on Australia Day, patriots mobilise in their droves and take back all the cities of Australia a sea of Aussie flags and White faces, I think it will be a kind of spiritual revival of sorts of our people.

 

Because Australia is under attack, our national identity is under attack. Obviously, we live under a regime that is occupying us and calls itself the Australian government and pretends to be representative of Australia, but actually hates Australia! And is really trying to destroy Australia! The people rising up against it en masse, because the biggest issue we have in Australia is, I would say, apathy! The average Australian wants Australia to keep being Australia and isn’t happy with the direction of the country. But they’re not doing anything. There’s no vehicle for them to express that. I think this could be something quite powerful. I thought August 31st changed the mood in Australia. I think Australia Day could be even more potentially potent in changing the national mood and setting the tone for a new paradigm.

 

Blair Cottrell: The State’s going to be used to rough us up a bit before that happens. The average Australian will be fine if you’re just a regular march attendee, but anyone who has any kind of influence, any positive reputation, good standing with the public right now, whether it’s people streaming public, speakers, organisation leaders. Yeah, they’re going to come up with whatever they can to harass us, get us into court.

 

I’m going to do my best to stay out of all that shit, but we’ll see what they come up with, because it turns out I’m on their radar, too, despite not really doing anything apart from appearing on these streams. Interesting! It’ll be interesting indeed to see what they come up with. But whatever. It’s all new territory we’re moving into now. Like, it’s not just a matter of going to court for some summary hate speech offence or losing your bank account or the stuff that we’re used to, they’re going to ramp it up and they’re going to try new things to shut us up. And I don’t even know what they’re going to come up with, but it’s a little bit concerning.

 

But whatever, you know whatever! We’re in too deep now. We’ve come too far to turn back.

 

[1:42:56]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, anyway, maybe we could do the Superchats and wrap the show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: That sounds good because I wanted to go to the gym. I haven’t been to the gym yet.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Blair going to the gym. But I didn’t realise you went to the gym, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes do that. Yeah, sometimes. Sometimes a mate of mine just fills me in with some really interesting spergy facts about history while I’m in the gym.

 

A lot of people like that video about the fingers, the story about the British fingers, and a lot of people told me they don’t think it’s true. There’s a mixed opinion about that. And what I’m talking about is where the “rude finger” came from. I won’t do it on the show because I’m obviously not vulgar like that, but this finger from the British. You know how the British are like “up yours”. Yeah. Joel told me during one of our workouts a while ago.

 

Joel Davis: It’s good folklore. It’s good folklore. Like who cares if it’s true or not? It’s exceptional folklore. It’s ancient, you know, Anglo Saxon folklore.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about, what we’re talking about, if you don’t know, is apparently the French, when they would capture British archers or longbowmen, they’d use these fingers for archery to pull the bow back. And when they captured those archers that cut their fingers off to prevent them from firing any more arrows.

 

But if you still had your fingers and you came up against the French you do this as like a gesture of rebellion or insolence like:

 

“Hey, we still have our fingers. We can still shoot you!”

 

And then eventually, like, one finger dropped and it just became the rude finger. But some people say that’s not the case, that the rude finger is an exclusively American phenomena. But I don’t know. I think there’s merit to the theory that Joel put out there. And it is cool folklore. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, I was taught that as a young boy, and I think a lot of Anglo Saxons were taught that as a young boy. It’s folklore of our people. And I don’t care what some jewish anthropologist says that’s trying to deconstruct our ancient lore.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like no one let’s you have anything, do they? Anything interesting or cool from you know White or European history. It’s just like you’ve got some fact checker thing saying:

 

“False, that’s not true! It’s not that cool actually!”

 

But the Superchats I listed, if you want to read them out, Joel, I listed them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll read them out. So WhiteBitch666 said:

 

“Fuck these psychotic commies. I’m so sick of all these tranny lovers in my country. They will try to kill you if you refuse to call a broad chinned man a woman, or recognise difference between races.”

 

Well, I think I feel you on that one. The Bearded Indian said:

 

“Communism is an expression of Judaism. Trump will not designate Antifa a terrorist organisation because that would contravene the interests of Trump’s jewish donors.”

 

I don’t know if that’s necessarily. I mean, I agree with you that communism is a product of the jews, obviously. But I don’t know if that’s where Trump’s apprehension comes from because Antifa has caused problems for Israel. Because the communists and the Zionists don’t see eye to eye on that issue.

 

So I don’t know if the Zionist donors behind Trump would even really get in his way on Antifa, which only makes it all the more pathetic! That he basically has nothing holding him back other than his own weakness, basically, and his own political like assertion.

 

Blair Cottrell: How do we know? It’s still early days and the FBI is still doing its investigation. So how do we know that he won’t turn around and list them?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I just, it’s not the vibe that I’m getting and it’s not the vibe that I’m getting.

 

Blair Cottrell: He might go for one obscure Leftist group. Like there’s a Leftist group that’s been named here as possibly associated with the Charlie Kirk’s assassin called the Democratic Socialists of America. It just looks like, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s not an obscure group Blair. That’s actually a massive group!

 

Blair Cottrell: It looks really gay and shit though their logo is really crap. So I thought it was just thrown together online or something.

 

Joel Davis: Well, like, let’s look it up. How many members does the Democratic Socialist of America have? 85,000.

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose that’s decent. Yeah. But maybe you can start off by listing a group like that as a terror org. Right. And then you work your way up.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, that would be cool if they look, if they do that, that’d be pretty fucking cool! Liam4 said:

 

“Has Blair finished Doom Eternal yet?”

 

That’s for you, obviously.

 

[1:47:33]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I finished it, but I saw a lot of videos of people who are really good at it. Like, really good! Because that game has been out for a while. And I wanted to get that good too.

 

So I started like, changing all the binds on my keys and my mouse buttons and I started practicing to try to do quick switching as best I could while staying in the air as often as I could. This is Doom Eternal. And I got really mad, bro! [chuckling] I gotta be honest. That game is really hard. It’s one of those games that it doesn’t matter how good you get, the AI system of the enemies is so aggressive and sophisticated that they’ll just chase you down and really make you have a bad day. I did finish the game, to answer your question, in short.

 

But then I started playing it to try to become really good at it, and I just got really angry with it. I got kind of good, but not as good as some people are. Like the videos I’ve seen on YouTube of gameplay on Doom Eternal. Fucking insane! It’s like really cool how good at something people can get, guys especially. But the more I tried to play Doom Eternal and get better at it, the more I started thinking I should do piano or something if I’m going to commit to something that’s like I’m going to get really good at, I should do it with something that’s a little bit more sophisticated or cultured than Doom Eternal. [chuckling] I mean, am I a bit of a nerd for thinking that? I don’t know?

 

Joel Davis: No, no. You’re 100% correct in thinking that. ItWasMadeUp said:

 

“Did Striker ever respond to the debate offer?”

 

He turned it down. So [Mark] Collett proposed the idea that because Eric Striker, I guess an old associate turned annoying retard on the Internet, he started throwing shade at Tom Sewell and myself. He started criticising Tom after the August 31 rallies. Because in Tom’s speech he says:

 

“Oh, when the Palestinians and the communists came for the Aussie flags, it was us that defended them.”

 

And then Striker said:

 

“Oh, look, the NSN in Australia, they’re not real National Socialists because they’re attacking Palestinians and they’re playing into the hands of the jews!”

 

And it was just so ridiculous! At the same rally, the NSN threw Zionists out, including Avi Yemeni and his goons. We push Zionists out behind the scenes of the rally in general.

 

And obviously we’re anti-jewish and anti-zionist, fundamentally. We’ve always had a policy of staying out of the way of the pro-Palestine rallies. We don’t want to be attack dogs for the jews. We’re not going to help the jews out by taking out their enemy. We’re going to let them deal with their own problem.

 

But the Palestinians have been rallying in the street. And let’s be real, the Palestinian issue has been hijacked by communists, particularly in Melbourne, that then use it for, to give them an excuse to rally every week. Because they can’t get people to rally every week around communism, but they can get people to rally every week around the Palestine issue. And so they’ve hijacked the pro-Palestine thing.

 

But the other pro-Palestine groups that are run by like Arabs and stuff have been complicit and work with these communist groups. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why have they done that? Why do the Arabs work with transvestites and Marxists and feminists and all these weird cunts from the city? Like, why do the Muslims tolerate that shit?

 

Joel Davis: Well, obviously it has some benefit because the Left has made concessions to the pro-Palestinian side. And so there’s obviously some political benefit they achieve from that.

 

But anyway, they cast their die with these communists. And in the lead up to this rally, I got intelligence from my sources in the pro-Palestine movement. A few sources that are a little bit more anti-communist, were telling me that there was a little bit of infighting inside the movement and that some pro-Palestinian voices that are predominantly Arabs were saying:

 

“We don’t want to be oppositional to the march for Australia, rather just like do our own thing and avoid it.”

 

And the communists insisted, particularly in Melbourne:

 

“No, (and I think in Brisbane as well.) No, the pro-Palestine march must mobilise and attack basically the March for Australia!”

 

And I put out a post, I said:

 

“Don’t play into the hands of the communists. Come out now, oppose this. Distance the pro-Palestine movement from this.”

 

Because I wanted to March for Australia to be a success. I didn’t want it to be attacked. We have left the pro-Palestine movement alone for two years! We asked them to leave us alone for one day! And okay, the communists attack us. You could say:

 

“Oh, but the communists, just dressed up as, brought Palestinian flags and attacked you. You can’t blame that on the pro-Palestine movement.”

 

Okay, but who in the pro-Palestine movement has come out in the days since and condemned the violence of people that are wearing the kaffir and holding the Palestine flags, condemned the violence that they perpetrated against Australian patriots? And said:

 

“Oh, we don’t agree with that. And we disavow that.”

 

Blair Cottrell: I did not. I did Notice that on August 31st though, the Muslims weren’t with the Leftists counter-protesters. The Palestinians really weren’t. There was Palestinian flags.

 

Joel Davis: In Melbourne there wasn’t that many there, of course. I agree with this. But they didn’t publicly distance themselves or condemn it. Right? They should have said:

 

“Not in our name. We don’t agree with this. We don’t want to, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but I think by just not showing up, by saying nothing and not showing up, that is basically saying it.

 

[1:53:19]

 

Joel Davis: But they didn’t completely not show up in the sense that there were like the pro-Palestine movement officially was on the posters and there were brown people at the counter-protests. I saw some in the Sydney counter-protest images and so on. It wasn’t all Whites, so, …

 

But look, when Tom said the Palestinians, he wasn’t saying, he wasn’t insinuating himself in the Palestine Israel conflict. He wasn’t taking the side of Israel against Palestine. He was just talking about the pro-Palestinian protesters.

 

Blair Cottrell: People can only think in simplistic dynamics. And so as soon as you criticise only one thing but not the other, or you mention one thing and not the other, people assume that you’re declaring some sort of allegiance or, not allegiance necessarily, but favouritism to the other side.

 

And that’s why people started accusing him of being pro-Israel because he only called out Palestinians in that segment of the speech. But he didn’t say anything about Israel. And that’s how simple people are.

 

Joel Davis: Tom Sewell, he calls out Israel way more than he calls out Palestine. Like in general he talks about Israel and jews a lot. If you go on his Telegram, you type in Israel and then he’s had to make a whole series of new Telegrams. So it’s not even an old Telegram. But if you go to like, because it’s been banned from Telegram so many times. I went to the Tom Sewell Telegram, I typed in “Israel”. There was 43 results! Like the guy talks about, … Tom Sewell’s an anti-semite, Nazi! Obviously he’s anti-Israel.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about here is we know this and most people watching the stream know this, but I’m talking about the average capacity for understanding can only see in black or white. That’s why when you say socialism, we’re, …

 

Joel Davis: We’re talking about a guy, Eric Striker, who I have known for years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he could be just using that, …

 

Joel Davis: A National Socialist, who knows who I am, knows who Tom is, and has interacted with us on the Internet for many, many, many years. Right? He knows that he’s full of shit! And so he’s literally lying! And then trying to present us as if we are Zionists, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think he’s doing that? What’s the motivation?

 

Joel Davis: I think he’s doing it because I think he’s got an issue with us because we’re not pro-Russia, and he’s like a pro-Russia shill. And he has a personal issue with me and I think he has a personal issue with Tom.

 

So I think Tom insulted him at some point many years ago and I had a personal falling out many years ago. And so he’s putting personal petty bullshit and a difference of opinion on some other issue, which he may or may not be aligned with because he’s getting funding from a particular source or what have you, ahead of the so-called movement that apparently we’re both a part of undermining us and attacking us, Australian National Socialists.

 

And we just had a massive success. And we just had a huge propaganda and public relations success. The whole, like I saw the whole world was talking about what was happening on the March for Australia. It was a massive story! And we had done a lot of work kicking Zionists out. He said:

 

“Oh it was a Zionist rally because Paul Pauline Hanson marched in Brisbane (who shouldn’t even give a speech). And Bob Katter gave a speech in fucking Townsville.”

 

Who cares about the fucking Townsville march? No Zionist gave speeches in Sydney or Melbourne or any of the big major marches, that I’m aware of he’s presenting it like as if we went and like beat up communists to facilitate like big Zionist rally, which is disingenuous! We said from the beginning:

 

“We are going to secure this rally from all foreign influence. Zionist, Chinese, Russian, Palestinian, any foreign issue. That’s not the day for it. Today is the day for Australia!”

 

We do not have to make arrangements to not upset Palestinians in our own country when we’re rallying for our own country’s cause. They need to make arrangements to not upset us! They need to make arrangements to distance themselves from people attacking us. It is their obligation. They are the fucking visitors. This is our country! But they have no respect.

 

And so we are supposed to bend over backwards to care about the feelings of the pro-Palestine movement and Tom can’t say one thing in a speech that could be misinterpreted in a certain way? Where’s the Palestinians coming out and showing sympathy for the fact that people dressed up in Palestinian garb and beat up old men and old ladies for being Australian patriots? Where are they coming out and condemning this and trying to say:

 

“We’re not against the Australian people, we just fighting for our homeland against Israel.”

 

And Australia just recognised Palestine as a state, by the way. To say:

 

“Thank you, Australians aren’t the enemy!”

 

No! There’s a lot of anti-White elements in their movement that don’t give a shit about Australian patriots! Don’t give a about Australian nationalism! And they say:

 

“Always was, always will be!”

 

Align themselves with Aboriginals, align themselves with anti-White positions. And Eric Striker, the little faggot, wants us to bend over backwards to appease these anti-White invaders in our country, basically. Unwelcome guests. So you know fuck him!

 

Blair Cottrell: We’ve just breached the two hour mark and we don’t, …

 

Joel Davis: And also I will say this, he’ll call me out, he’ll talk shit publicly to my name publicly, right? Then Mark Collett, who’s a mutual friend of both of ours, says:

 

“Why don’t you guys do a debate? Why don’t you debate these two positions and work out who’s right or who’s wrong?”

 

And then he can’t even show up to a debate. Where’s the integrity? If you’re going to talk shit, let’s fucking debate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Was Mark going to mediate the debate?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

[1:59:37]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: The eternal, the eternal Libra. Keep everything fair. Look, I think the reason there seems to be more infighting on the Right sometimes or in nationalism is because there’s just bigger and more interesting personalities in nationalism. An individual personality is not discouraged like it is in communist circles. I think there’s just as much infighting in like far-Left groups. This is kept under wraps and they effectively bully each other into silence.

 

Whereas it’s harder to bully people on the Right because they’re kind of used to bullying and they’re used to standing up to it and maintaining their position in the face of it. There’s less infighting than there used to be. I can say that 10 years ago infighting on the Right was much worse. And you guys know me, I don’t really go for the whole Left, Right, political spectrum paradigm thing. I’m just using these terminologies because they mean something to you in order to be understood. A lot of Superchats, guys. And we’ve just breached, as I was saying, the two hour mark.

 

I hope the debate between Joel and is it Eric Striker? Eric Striker does happen, because I want to see Joel. I love to see Joel in a debate with someone who really doesn’t like him, because that’s where Joel shines, in my opinion. It’s very entertaining, so I hope it happens.

 

Joel Davis: There is a debate that I’m trying to line up at the moment with someone here in Australia who I think is, like a conservative, which is the kind I should be debating. I shouldn’t have to fucking debate people on my own fucking side, or supposedly on my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: At least people on your side will debate you because people on the other side don’t want to debate. They just want to, …

 

Joel Davis: Apparently, he’s on my side. He talks shit about me and he won’t even fucking debate me. I mean, it’s just pathetic! But he’s a little faggot! Like fuck him!

 

How’s It Going says:

 

“Hail NSN. Hail Tom Sewell. Hail Joel Davis. Hail Blair Cottrell. Hail Black Magic SS. Hail Victory!”

 

Black Magic SS is a band.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I wasn’t sure what that was.

 

Joel Davis: Nate Oz says:

 

“Thoughts on Sam from the Two Worlds Collide podcast making videos, talking about Sewell and shit talking about the NSN and saying his sources from the army claimed he was a coward and a fraud when he was serving.”

 

Yeah, well, that’s garbage! Two Worlds Collide, he’s part of a collective of influences that obviously is connected to the conservative establishment. And he was told to attack us because they tried to hijack Aug 31. They failed in doing so, and so now we’re, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you fill me on that? Who’s Two Worlds Collide Podcasts? And how does he know about Tom’s army service?

 

Joel Davis: He doesn’t know. Because he used to serve in the ADF.

 

Now, Tom, he was an infantryman. He wanted to go to Afghanistan at the time, or he was supposed to be deployed to Afghanistan a few times, and his whole, like, unit or company or whatever, the tour got cancelled and delayed. And then Tom, he’s told the story of the reasons why he left the army.

 

But the reason why he left the army was because of personal disputes he had with people. There was a idea that he’s a coward because he was sitting there waiting to go to Afghanistan, and then they cancelled the trip. It doesn’t really make any sense. He was ready to go. You know, Tom, he likes to have a fight. Obviously, Tom was depressed! There was, I think, two people that were in his unit that killed themselves because they cancelled the tour, because they were just so hyped to go and so depressed when they couldn’t go. People don’t join the infantry because they’re afraid of fighting. Like, you can join them [words unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I want to say. It’s antithetical to the truth! If there’s two things that Tom is not. It’s cowardly and fraudulent. That guy wears his heart on his sleeve. [chuckling] He does not tell lies! What he believes is written all over. He openly admits it, and he’s certainly not a coward! This guy will fight for what he believes and for his friends.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, Two Worlds Collide if you think Tom is such a coward, when he gets out of jail, why don’t you fucking get in the ring with him?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah, it’s pretty, … I think when you sit on a podcast and you call somebody else a coward and a fraud while they’re in prison after standing up for what they believe doesn’t that make you the coward?

 

Joel Davis: Well, to be fair, he. I think he made the video before August 31st. He was reacting to Tom’s speech at nationals. But nevertheless, if you think he’s a coward when don’t you get in the ring with him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Does he get an audience, this Two Worlds Collides guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he gets some views on Instagram.

 

But anyway, it was just a really retarded video. Like, his criticism of National Socialism was the that Hitler was on drugs and that he got the army to take drugs. You know, every army takes drugs. I thought you were in the army? Like, what are you talking about? And that’s the criticism. Like, you didn’t even bring up the “Holocaust” or some bullshit! He was just like:

 

“Hitler was on drugs. He’s a bad guy!”

 

[2:04:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, the entire political apparatus in Australia is on all sorts of drugs for their mental health, anxiety disorders. Does that make them an equally bad government? Well, it makes them much worse of a government than Hitler’s government, in my opinion. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, we won’t get into that. Let’s move on to the next. I don’t really care.

 

Joel Davis: Bitch666 said:

 

“Striker has soft hands.”

 

Presumably you’ve maybe met Striker in real life. He does seem like a fat little bitch to me. How’s It Going says:

 

“Joel and Blair, you’re both an inspiration to the entire White world. Could Australia be a stronghold for the White race? How do you feel about Whites immigrating there to consolidate?”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s how it started.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I do believe that that’s what we’re fighting for. And I support White immigration of course, if you want to move to Australia and you want to come join the movement and you’re a White guy from overseas, you’re more than welcome to. Or girl. Especially if you’re a White girl from overseas, I think you’re even more welcome. Nate Oz said:

 

“Hey, Joel, did you see Paul Miller, Gypsy Crusader, talk about you and Tom on Jake Shield’s podcast? Would you ever have Paul on a podcast?”

 

I didn’t see that, but from what I’ve seen, I have seen him on Twitter saying positive things about us and I do appreciate that. I’ve never spoken to him before, but if he would like to do some kind of collaboration. Yeah, I’d be down. Of course. It could be fun. Do you know who Gypsy Crusader is, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Is he the guy with the kind of long hair that makes the, … What’s that, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s really famous for, like the Omegle videos where he’s like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Omegle. Yeah. Even though at first I used to think it was kind of just like vulgar shock value entertainment, I’ve seen the guy actually represent what he believes in and he’s fairly articulate. And so, yeah, I actually think he’s all right. I don’t know enough about the guy. You guys know me. I don’t know much about anyone. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I haven’t seen a huge amount of his content, but from, I mean, he seemed like he’s entertaining. And like you said, when he’s getting serious, seems to be pretty cozy.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can say this, he’s very American. He’s like, he’s very American. And by that I mean he’s got a certain bravado about him that us Australians don’t really have. We’re kind of a bit more cynical, sceptical down here. We’re not so willing to put ourselves out there all the time. And if we do, we do it in a way that’s like. We still somewhat reserved, but he’s just like he’s going hard. And I don’t know, like I think he’s good value. Is that his real name, is it Paul? I’m not sure.

 

Joel Davis: Paul Miller is his real name apparently.

 

But yeah, if he would like to do a podcast, of course. Peter Sims, 1488 says:

 

“Free Thomas Sewell! He didn’t do nothing!”

 

Ain’t that true? Oh, we gotta get you going on this Blair. Aussie Order 88 said:

 

“Based Blair calling everything gay lately. Hope your gift shopping went well.”

 

There was a Blair ranting about gift shopping. Let’s reprise this take because I think it’s quite a funny take.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it was just yesterday I was spending some time in shopping centre looking for a present. Present was for a good friend’s son. Now his son was having his first birthday so he’s still just a baby. And I’m walking around thinking:

 

“What do you buy a one year old baby?”

 

I feel like anything I buy the baby, like let’s say I wrap up a present, the baby’s probably just going to play with the wrappings more than the present that I get for him. He’s not going to understand the value of any gift. And then I’m starting to think like I can’t even think about what would make a baby happy. Then I realised I’ve been in this situation many times before! I can’t even think about what would make any individual happy because I’m never thinking about that. I’m thinking about community issues and the country [chuckling] and what’s coming in the future for the entire community and country. Like how satisfied one person is about getting a present. It’s only momentary satisfaction too that wears off in about 30 seconds. It’s like, why would I invest any time into thinking about that?

 

And I realised how annoying buying gifts is and how gay it is if you’re a man trying to buy a present for someone, even if it’s for your own girlfriend. It’s just like you can’t get into that small mindset where suddenly instead of thinking about what matters, you’re just thinking about the temporary 30 second long satisfaction and experience of happiness that you’re going to create for one individual. Like why would anyone care about that? I don’t know! It’s just I find gift buying really annoying [sp] and it puts it into perspective. It puts something into perspective for you too, doesn’t it? It makes you realise that that same female perspective, that crushed down, shrunken perspective about the individual’s happiness is one of the problems that we have at government level, isn’t it? Because all of these women are too concerned with how an individual immigrant might feel satisfied or personally happy with the fact they’re coming into Australia. And that makes the woman feel good about herself providing that kind of lifestyle to individuals.

 

And so that’s all that really matters. So long as the female government bureaucrats feel like good people for helping out individuals and making them momentarily happy. That basically seems to be the extent of our government’s thought process. And that needs to stop! Doesn’t it?

 

[2:10:25]

 

So I don’t know. That’s the whole experience that I had yesterday. But I chose a present for my mate’s one year old son. I got a bucket of, what did I get, a bucket of like little blocks that stuck on top of each other and you can make little structures out of them. So he can make bridges and you can make little houses and stuff. Because I don’t trust any books, children’s books these days. I’ve heard some horror stories about children’s books, so I didn’t want to risk that. And I thought he can do something physical, he can make little bridges! So hopefully he gets some enjoyment out of that.

 

But like I said, it was difficult to even, to even think about it. But hey, I’m glad you guys enjoyed the rant. I had [chuckling] a fair few people laugh at that. So no, it wasn’t Lego, it wasn’t Lego. It was little timber blocks, different colours. And it’s perfect for a little one year old who’s trying to work out shapes and fittings and stuff like that.

 

And actually it was recommended to me by a few people. So I didn’t really decide myself. Someone had to help me out of that problem. But it is interesting, isn’t it, how, I’m sort of just reiterating the point I made that all men do actually have a problem with thinking on in short term and small matters like that. But when it comes to taking care of another individual person, women are just better at it. Women are more geared for that than men are. And it’s almost cruel to expect that of a man. To expect a man to go out there and think of some miraculous, incredible gift or series of presents, to expect him to buy that, to like conceptualise of that and buy it for someone. It’s like you’re asking him to basically be a woman. You’re asking him to be gay! [chuckling]

 

So I think I’d like to see a culture where women handle the gift buying and men don’t really have to think about it.

 

Joel Davis: That’s basically what I do. I just kind of consult the woman on gifts, mostly when they’re for women and children. Like, if I was trying to buy you a gift, for example, would be slightly easier because I could just think about what’s some shit that I would like that you would also like or something. And I could probably think of something.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the thing is, if I’m gonna get someone a present that I would like, I’d get them I don’t know, something practical, like dishwashing detergent. Some, like, scrubbing brushes.

 

Joel Davis: Laundry detergent? Is that what I’m getting for fucking Christmas this year from you? Is it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s expensive stuff, man! Have you seen, like, good dishwashing detergent that doesn’t, like, wreck your dishes and stuff? It’s like, …

 

I would love to get that as a gift. If I opened up and if I put up a present and it was dishwashing detergent and a new, like, bucket and a mop, I’d be like:

 

“Great! Fantastic! I need this. I’m going to use this!”

 

Whereas if I get, like I don’t know, … What’s a present that a woman would buy you? Like, I don’t even know, man! I just want something that I can use is what I’m saying. If I’m gonna get a gift, I prefer not to get gifts, actually. It makes me feel awkward. I don’t want to be, … Because you know what? You know how people give you gifts? You know how people give you a present, and then they’re staring at you to see how you react?

 

Joel Davis: You’ve got to pretend like it’s awesome and shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: And you gotta act like you’re really happy about.

 

Joel Davis: Even if you get something that you like, you just kind of think about in your head. You don’t have a reaction. And then you got to be like:

 

“Oh!”

 

I don’t usually make a reaction. And then they kind of I notice that they look, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you guys imagine Joel getting a present? Like, even a present that he kind of likes? Can you imagine his reaction? Imagine the disappointment of Joel’s mother growing up, trying to make him happy with presents. He would have opened up every present on Christmas and just been like, … No, man, like, it’s annoying. You know how girls, like, meet each other on the street and they’re like:

 

“Oh, my God! I love you! You’re amazing!”

 

And it’s all an act. It’s all a fucking act! Like, when I see my friends on the street, I’m like:

 

“What’s going on?”

 

You know, it’s not that exciting just to see your friend on the street.

 

But you know what else is funny? After the girls put on that big fuss after seeing each other in public, they walk away bitching about each other, don’t they?:

 

“That fucking skank! I hate that bitch!”

 

Right? But then the men will insult each other to their faces. That’s like their way of greeting each other.

 

But then we’ll walk away thinking:

 

“Man, I love that guy. He’s a sick cunt!”

 

[chuckling] So it’s just this completely inverted reality that men and women exist in. It’s really interesting to explore. I find it interesting anyway.

 

[2:15:05]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But in summary, like, I just prefer to have an arrangement where it’s like, I don’t need to get you shit, you don’t need to get me shit, and I just get my own stuff, you know, personally. Yeah. When it comes to gifts I’m not great. You gotta try and get something. But that’s when I basically consult the woman. What are we getting the kid? You know?

 

Blair Cottrell: But someone’s saying I’m ungrateful. I’m definitely not ungrateful. Like when I ruptured my pec tendon, people sent me gifts, and it was really helpful. Collagen, supplements. I got a lot of help from people from that, and that was fantastic because that’s stuff I actually needed. Right. I was injured. But I mean when someone’s trying to give you a gift actually just to make themselves feel good because they want to see you get excited. And then if you don’t get excited, you’re letting the person down. And then they’re just like:

 

“Oh, you’re a prick!”

 

That’s not real gift giving. That’s just you being selfish. That’s like you just trying to spend some money and hand someone some bullshit and see their reaction so you can feel good about yourself. I don’t know. I’m not against giving gifts. I don’t really know how to finish this.

 

The way I’ll wrap it up is my family were farmers. Yeah. The Cottrells. Dairy farmers for generations in Australia. They’re cold, hard working people. I don’t know where my passion came from. Probably from my mother’s side. The rest of my family are just very rigid, cold people. And every birthday party they ever hosted, they always said on the invitation, “no presents please”. Because they were just like practical people. I think the reason my dad’s side of the family never wanted to receive presents is because they never wanted to give them either. And if you’ve received presents, then you’re later obliged to give presents as well. You know what I mean?

 

So we’re a “no present” kind of family. My family, the Cottrells.

 

Joel Davis: I guess we should probably wrap this subject up. What else we got here? Anything? Peter Sims sent $1 to:

 

“Go get yourself some dishwashing detergent.”

 

How much fucking dishwashing detergent are we gonna buy with a dollar? Are you a fucking cheap cunt?

 

Come on, you know. $1 worth of dishwashing detergent, please. Let me get like a little, …

 

Blair Cottrell: One of [chuckling] those novelty ones.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, jewish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Megawatts 80 sent through $2 saying:

 

“Superchats make the show go longer.”

 

Well, stop sending them, guys. Because I want to go. I want to go to the gym.

 

Joel Davis: If you send a Superchat now, fuck you! I’m not reading it. We are done! The show is over. Hail victory! Blood and honour! White power!

 

Blair Cottrell: He says as he clings, he says as he clings for that last Superchat, which comes through from Lion Cross. $50. He says:

 

“Right. Every cunt get Blair a scrubbing brush for Christmas!”

 

Do it, guys. I like to clean my house. I like a clean environment. And so if I’m getting gifts, I want it to be cleaning products. [chuckling] I’m a practical man.

 

 

All right, guys, good show. Thanks for joining us. Love your work. Thanks for the donations. We’ll see you guys when we see you, I guess. Keep you updated on the next show.

 

[2:18:18]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 79)

[Latest at the top]

jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’d like to see Joel and Striker debate. I follow and like both, but I do NOT understand the antipathy Striker seems to have toward the Australian NSN in general. American political dissidents seem to have a harder time getting their egos out of the way for the sake of building a movement, which is probably one reason why there is no real movement to speak of in America. That and the fact that the jew-occupied government has been waging war against right wing organizers for decades (another case of liberal democracy taking the absurd position of having to destroy democracy in order to allegedly save democracy). Those who want to be leaders need to step up the game and act like men capable of rational discourse. They don’t have to like each other, but they don’t have to snipe at each other either. Side note, I think Blair may have the beginnings of a stand up comedy act talking about the difference between men and women. Fucking funny.
1 likes

Report
Oz74
1 day ago
I think Charlie Kirk was a greater man than prophet Muhammad… I’ve watched all Charlie’s videos since about 2015-16…The leftist always turn to violence and avoid any discussion that doesn’t go along with their world views..The posts mocking Charlie Kirks death are sickening..I can’t believe people are that evil..
2 likes

Report
bobbytimms
1 day ago
Free sewell!
1 like

Report
RevolutionaryFrog
1 day ago
It’s time for you guys to get some intro music / clips. These videos just make it hard to watch sometimes with the dryness.
-2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’ll take things that don’t fucking matter for $500, Alex.
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please watch Kirk is a psyop, https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please I beg you stop buying into these “behavior modification “ psyops,like (((Fink))) from Blackrock said ..they will force behaviors https://rumble.com/v6z1iy2-warning-if-you-cheer-charlie-kirks-death-youre-a-domestic-terrorist-and-wil.html
0 likes

Report
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
Hi Joel, just watching you on Jake Shields show. You might want to watch this video and read the transcript. I have been leading the effort to remove the Australian government since 2008. Court room video: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomVideo Court room transcript: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomTranscript
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:49:55 Striker should tone down his absurd love of mohammedans and spend his time learning German. Hitler’s view on the Palestinians limited itself to pointing out the hypocrisy of jewish-administered Britain and the jew colony. Hitler spoke positively having some openness to violence in one’s ethics, like the mohammedan savages have, but he was not an advocate of Arabs other than that everyone should be separate and held to the same standard (to which no semite holds himself).
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:23:20 is there a jury trial for such charges in Oz, or is it decided by a judge alone?
0 likes

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
3 days ago
6 moths to 3 years, can’t go wrong with a few kg of Kinetic Sand. 2 year old, big bag of Mega Blocks. You can get them second hand. 3 year old, Leap Frog tablet computer. Simply look up the development miles stones for the age group, and get a toy that promotes the practice of those skills. Women are not very good at doing this. Dads are the ones that buy the presents that challenge the kids, which the kids find highly engaging.
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
4 days ago
The passport bros are breeding a new race in Asia. This Wasian race could serve as both information reconnaissance, and the foraging of alliances with other ethno-nationalist movements.
-1 like

Report
Seppl88
4 days ago
Communism is Jewish!
2 likes

Report
ForRealers
5 days ago
Yess!!! Please try and get Gypsy Crusader on the show – that would be epic!!
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
5 days ago
Oh my goodness please have Gypsy on! That guy is best!
1 like

Report
lengiles
5 days ago
Given that Kirk was starting to revise his position on Israel, I can’t help suspecting some form of Mossad involvement in his shooting. It wouldn’t be the first time they manipulated a deranged amateur into doing their dirty work for them. Also, the notable silence you mentioned from the conservative establishment, the lack of calls for Antifa to be banned. Makes me wonder if their puppet-masters advised them to leave Antifa alone.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
radi8wl
5 days ago
When people say things like ‘he was afraid ‘israel’ was going to kill him’ her meant jews but everyone is afraid to say jews so they use words like: antifa, communist, left, israel, Bolshevik, Illuminati, bankers etc. I thought you knew this stuff, but then you follow up that remark by saying it could be mossad but you’re sticking with antifa. THEY’RE THE SAME THING JOEL, JEWS FFS. If your censoring yourself then please admit it in the beginning so you don’t lead Whites astray and you’re a shitty Nazi fwiw. Hitler won bc he named the jew and they couldn’t hide, his problem was allowing 25‰’ers into nsdap, anyway I hope that’s all it is, otherwise I’m sensing some higher level neurolinguistic programming, I hope not but it would explain baphomet. Sorry but no normal people see a white baby eating tranny ‘god’ and want it forever tattooed on their beautiful White skin. It’s not edgy even to og ‘goth girls’ like me.
1 like

Report
radi8wl
5 days ago
C’mon Joel, are you really ignorant of the fact that antifa, ‘communist left’ (as if there’s a communist right) and israel all have 1 thing in common!? They’re jews run by criminal jew hq ‘israel’. If you think you’re ever going to find ‘evidence’ that mossad is guilty of anything you don’t understand the world we’re living in, and believing the ‘official story’ makes you sound gullible at best. Obv you’re trying to propagandize your followers towards antifa, but it’s jews pushing tranny, funding antifa and every other evil out there. The problem with you young WN is the jews have still infected ur brain with fear of ‘conspiracy theories’, conspiracies have been happening as soon as 3 humans existed, they happen every day. When someone calls you a conspiracy theorist it’s the same as calling you a racist or a nazi, you can substitute all those words with ‘SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP OR ELSE’. Otherwise we love Thomas Sewell wish he was in America, there’s no one else so far that understands the big picture. The practical and the metaphysical AND the conspiracies. You and Blair are doing your best for Tom and White’s so thanks for that, disclaimer: Blair is not part of any org (giggle) you know that’s not going to work I hope. May Jesus remove the veil from your eyes and protect you and bc he was the og ‘nazi’ fighting off the jews, while thor and odin were killing and raping other Whites. Baphomet is not a good look (speaking of antifa tranny jews and the gods they sacrifice White babies to). Hope you take that thoughtfully and with introspection. Much love from usa!
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/15/joel-davis-the-only-solution-to-antifascism-is-fascism-sep-14-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]
0 likes

Delete
1488Brother
5 days ago
Hit the fucking like button ffs
1 like

Report
1488Brother
5 days ago
It pisses me off this has 12k+ views
and only 355 likes as of now…
0 likes

Report
Angelalee0
5 days ago
The two finger “salute” has 2 meanings. Palm facing inward is a is highly “offensive” fck u and the palm facing outward is ” peace or victory”.. Anyway great livestream as always. Love the substance and also, fck Antifa
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 days ago
At this point, most of the governments of the West need to be declared terrorist organizations. It’s pretty terrible when you can’t even count on your own government to defend the rights of White people to exist. The cuckservatives and the kosher right in general will be swept into the dustbin of history. They should hope the sweeping is done by nazis who will simply push them to the side rather than the communists who will liquidate them and hose their remains off into the gutters of history.
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
And I wasn’t a fan of Charlie Kirk, especially him shilling for Israel. He didn’t deserve to me publicly executed for having opposite political opinion’s, the left is severely insane that it’s getting scary..
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
I believe the feds are backing up Antifa, I know that’s a bit far-fetched.
3 likes

Report
PlebbitorDestroyer
VerifiedSupporter+
6 days ago
Striker will never be a real woman
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
6 days ago
Your analysis is the 100% truth of this situation.
1 like

Report
beno668
6 days ago
I was just kicked from telegram chat and reported to moderators. Why are “fascist” moderators, who supposedly represent free speech channel, kicking allies such as myself?
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
chemicalfrogs001
6 days ago
anti ra is gh3y
1 like

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 check
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
What is the excuse for jailing him?
0 likes

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
donating for studio equipment and gear for you guise
3 likes

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
The Left has always been intertwined with violence, the Bolsheviks, Red Uprisings during the 1920s, Red Army Faction the list goes on. Hitler formed the SA to counter Communist violence as the State was unable to prevent it. Democracy can’t handle the fact that these psychos cannot be reasoned with. I agree with you guys.
1 like

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
If we had a just and stable Society then we would not National Socialism! It is the only Solution ,a true alternative to the Judeo-Ameriacan Empire, Liberal Democracy, Finance capital and Marxism.
1 like

Report
TVR_
6 days ago
Imagine gift giving in this economy
2 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
advocating for groups to be listed as terror groups is a 0 sum game, remember the greek golden dawn was listed as 1 when a member “did” something wrong so they couldnt take power after winning the election, eu has said they will annul the german election if afd win. its also a double standard that if a lib or labour or greens member did something untoward their organisation would not be held collectively responsible.
3 likes

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
6 days ago
I never watched Kirk, but it is fun to see clips of him hysterically asserting that SODOMY is conservative. Nobody would say Bill Clinton had conservative values, he was almost sacked for adultery. Now Judaeo-“christian” zionists say Trump the womanizer, adulterer and kiddy-fiddler is conservative… Even so, come Lord Jesus.
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
there is a kosher race going on to fill every white country with non white 3rd worlders because muh worker shortage, but in the next few years ai and robots will replace almost all workers, its almost like the jewbankers want a race war in all western countries and at the same time bring on ww3 while the western military is at its lowest point ever, allowing the west to lose and white amalek to be scrubbed from history once and for all. its ride or die time my fellow white folk.
1 like

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
jews use the white race as a surrogate for their sins so whites are blamed for their evil. national socialism is neither left or right, the whole left cheek, right cheek psy op with a kosher arsehole in the middle stick needs to end. kirk shooting shows how easy it is to shift folks that are pro freedom of speech into hate speech crusaders with “hurty words” against their dead “hero”. national socialists need to keep showing consistency in policy, something the kosher “right” lost while lining their pockets.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
every year jews will hold a ritual where they “put” their sins into live chickens and then march in the streets swinging the live chickens by their heads until they die and dumping them into the street. seems to me us whites are the chickens.
0 likes

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
Good response on the Erik Striker issue. When I heard Thomas say “the Palestinians” I assumed he misspoke and meant to say “the pro-palestine protesters.” I thought that was pretty obvious p.s. it’s a little disappointing to hear that the NSN leans more pro-ukraine over pro-russia considering Ukraine is a puppet of ZOG NATO (assuming that even is the stance of NSN maybe it’s not) but nevertheless it’s wrong of Erik to disavow you over that. Very stupid and wrong. Even though I personally lean pro-russia I am ultimately fully against that war bcos it’s just Whites killing each other senselessly and even more ultimately than that I am Australia first so the dumbest thing NatSocs can do is break apart their national movements over international issues. Disappointing in Erik that he can’t see past personal petty differences
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
I also acknowledge I can be completely misinformed about that war, maybe I should also lean pro-ukraine idk. nevertheless the idea that perspectives about events on the other side of the world should lead to breaking apart NatSocism movements is something I can’t back. White Unity is the number one priority. unlike the left, we can tolerate difference of opinion
1 like

Report
MisterXXXXX
1 week ago
moshe is a longwinded waffler
0 likes

Report
NotBabyHitler88
Supporter
1 week ago
I was promised Right Wing Death Squads
6 likes

Report
InReality33
1 week ago
Blair… stop countersignal concern posting Joel.
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
FLmetalhead
1 week ago
Totally Nice Day
5 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
1 week ago
Where the fuk is your black sheet
8 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Novgarods
1 week ago
how is he a coward? It takes alot of nerve to do that. He’ll be going to prison for the rest of his life
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motion937
1 week ago
Charlie was not just saying words. He was articulating ideas that the left does not like & he was winning the arguments against them. The issue of “words” was never the point. The left was losing on their ideas. That is what they hate. Their bullshit worldview was crumbling. That is why they called it hateful. Gas lighting nonstop. Because they were losing in the battlefield of ideas. What comes next is something they will hate even more. It will be a cathartic experience for everyone that is sick of their shit.
10 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
1 week ago
Heil the nsn
6 likes

Report
ResistenciaNS
1 week ago
TND.
14 likes

Report
MeanBeanComedy
1 week ago
Let the missus get presents for your mates’ kids! Gift-giving is fun between friends, since you can use your knowledge about that person to show you understand him and care about him. You can also use experience in a certain field. For example, I get my friends books they don’t even know they want, and I’m going to be getting my father a crossbow this year because his shoulder is too hurt to use a compound bow now. I like giving gifts sometimes!
3 likes

Report
somedude39
1 week ago
If this week taught me anything, it’s that no demographic is more keen on political assassinations than the swifties.
2 likes

Report
Kroninn
SubSupporter
1 week ago
Charlie Kirk was wearing a soft panel in his vest. they only stop pistol rounds(He was anticipating someone from thw crowd woild shoot him). The 30-06 round hit him in the chest, went through the Kevlar, traveled up his spine and exited through his neck.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1488Brother
5 days ago
He had no armor. You can see his nipples through his shirt in multiple pictures and videos from the event.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
We cannot coexist with these people. There is no talking it out. That is what Charlie was trying to do.
30 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
1 week ago
TND!
3 likes

Report
mickyrauz
1 week ago
5 adds in a row to watch this lol
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
henrybox
1 week ago
Do you have an adblock extension? I have Ublock origin lite
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EbeneezerYE24
1 week ago
You could also just use the Brave browser with its built in adblock.
1 like

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
They don’t ban antifa because “antifascism” is a creation of the winners of WWII.
16 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
jsmith980234
5 days ago
the jews were doing the antifascist schtick in 1930s Germany before Hitler and WW2. it’s just another iteration of that. the don’t ban it because it’s jewish.
4 likes

Report
OsoyoosKid
6 days ago
And we know who J are…!
0 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
We do need a strong man. Someone who has independent wealth, protection, and who has zero dirt that can be used against him. Someone impervious to Jews basically. Impervious to Jewish money and impervious to Jewish blackmail.
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GigaChud7
1 week ago
Well there are plenty lol, how do you think PF and White Australia perform so well? The issue is with the precedent of Charlie Kirk being murdered, whether or whether not the state had him killed, no doubt it’s open season on out leaders and financial backers.
0 likes

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
I think we should replace the word ‘antifascism’ with stupidity. Can’t reason with stupids.
8 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
Thank God here in America we have these couple of sentences, written on an obsolete piece of paper, that half the country despises…that’s what stands between our speech and these masses of rabid shitlibs. It was worth the head start on diversity. The right to bitch about it, and the right to be armed to the teeth. Depending if your state/county/city even recognizes constitutional rights. There are plenty which don’t. But I’d say…it’s a fair trade-off for the head start on diversity here in the states.
13 likes

Report
GrizzlyWhisker
1 week ago
I would love to send Tom an email while he’s in jail if it’s not a convoluted process that requires doxxing myself. I’m still not totally sure where to find the link but I’ll look around the Telegram.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003
2 likes

Report
Australian_Terra
1 week ago
The government already knows who you are.
1 like

Report
dcbyers13
1 week ago
Thank you both for your leadership. White Australia is quickly becoming the model for the rest of the white world.
47 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Reflections on the March for Australia – Sep 7, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/08/joel-davis-reflections-on-the-march-for-australia-sep-7-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell reflect on the recent successful March for Australia in major cities that drew at least 100,000 people. Also Tom Sewell’s (NSN leader) arrest as a result of the clash with leftists and communists at the so-called “Camp Sovereign” abo squatter encampment in a nearby park, that was being used as staging ground for attacks on Aussie marchers. And more, … – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 18,272 – Duration: 114 mins]
3 likes

===================

 

Odyssee Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 195)

HyperChat minimum:
$0.01
pius
11 hours ago
I’ve said this, whites need to get mean.

pius
13 hours ago
Fascism is seizing control of the state and pushing the left out of the political process . If it’s either your dictatorship or ours, if we’re going to have left wing authoritarianism or right wing authoritarianism, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism.
This just sounds like politics. I’m not sure why it even has to have the name fascism

Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
gift-giving
is an exercise in empathy. A heartfelt gift boils down to realizing what the other person would appreciate. narcissists have trouble with it. because they never really listen to what other people say (unless the topic is perceived as concerning their own interests)

danzimmons
3 days ago
Yes just like in the yookay, trying to save the children from porn lol as they pay the most degenerate homosexual tranni’s in kindergarten’s as well as their porno’s. Fuck those sellout anti White leaders

4
0
Green
5 days ago
Brilliant sarcasm by Blair at
10:00
.

4
0

@katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk.
– KATANA]
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]

elfoffgazza
5 days ago
Gypsy Crusader isn’t even White, he’s half Romani

2
0

@clintwayne
6 days ago
Eric Striker has nothing good to say about other ns groups, it time for him to grow up a realise the movement is far far bigger
than him and his over inflated ego.

4
0
King Tut
6 days ago(edited)
fuck Eric Striker, and Mike Jewnoch! they luv muslim cock. those 2 are THE most annoying guests on PWR show. Mike is the #1 reason why I could never get into TRS, and the entire NJP was very pro Islam. Warren Balough even bought Islamic merch of some muslim group that fight the Jews in the ME and promoted them on his show. but at least Warren is someone I can listen to and enjoy his inisights.
Mark is way too nice. it took him over 1 YEAR to depart with Jason Cohen. even after half his followers kept complaining about Jason, it took a huge scandal to kick Jason off the show cuz he flat out said we shouldn’t criticize or even mention Jews cuz it’s bad optics. and afterwards Jason TALKS SHIT ABOUT MARK ON HIS OWN SHOW!! this is after all the free promotions Mark gave Jason on PWR.

9
2
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
Odysee’s Warstrike channel muted me hours after I commented that “striker” counter-signaling NSN was sus. I only watched for Warren’s stories anyway.

3
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Hitlers Definition of Socialism
“A socialist is the one serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti property ; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency ; true socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of his community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” Adolf Hitler December 28th 1938.

12
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Fascism was a movement to save Europe from communism. Though thanks to today’s media almost everyone thinks that fascism is something horrible.
Of Italian fascism Churchill said “Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces which can rally the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilised society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism.”
Fascism in short is a defender of the nation, culture and people.

7
0
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
It was the European response to the Red Menace

Great Expectations
6 days ago
The are “violent communist terrorists” they are not “Anti-Fascist”

2
0
Hateful Yarn
6 days ago(edited)
33:00
yeah the narrative on reddit is that the shooter was a groyper or some alt light cuck. They’re not even talking about his trøøn boyfriend. No one is talking about that but us.

3
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
o//

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
o/

4
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
o/

4
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I am opposite I like to give presents but not receive them

5
0
Reginald Collett
7 days ago
Have you ever seen the paul hogan show?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
A spade great gift

2
0
WayTruthLight
7 days ago
TheHolyNewTestament Word rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more than anything else does, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. This isn’t rocket physics.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a mop

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
Lego ?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Why does the Palestinians and all the Muslims go and fight the Jews in Israel for the sandpit

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
I have no problem with Palestinians and Muslims if they go back to their own countries and stay there

3
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
Warstrike is so gay. Getting drunk, smoking, & praising superchats.

5
2

@EverybodywakeUp
7 days ago
Ricky Hattons died.

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Joel you are right o/

4
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
What benefits WHITE people have we had being Pro Palestine over the years no support.

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
bye brother

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NSN have done great

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
The BNP tried this joining up with Muslims and Palestine groups it doesn’t work they are Anti-white

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
seen gfro afar it didn’t look like there were vere many Arabs there

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Free Tomas Sewell

14
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
meanwhile don’t dare question Jewish history

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
HIT THAT FIRE BUTTON EVERYONE

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t let commie infiltrators take over the chat.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I’m gonna head out, y’all take it easy o/

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
free son of enos

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was even better

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Free Mr Bond

5
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
how long has it been now

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1967025836730835219

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
when we win we’ll make video games with Jew zombies

@SorenX
7 days ago
thanks

WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
https://entropystream.live/mobile/joeldavis

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
I thought it was great brother I will put up another one o/

@SorenX
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
are you joking? i see no link to entropy in the details?

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nazi zombies would be cool, we could unleash them on antifa at one of their protest

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was great , Avi is scum

2
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
try the entropy link

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
get racist or go extinct

7
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Indians are so disgusting

3
0

@SorenX
7 days ago

@joeldavis
is this on another tube site like rumble? odysee has a shitty bitcoin payment system i cant use

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
you beat me 2 it

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they are fringe and cringe

WaffleStake
7 days ago
fringe and cringe

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1966933551787774236

SovereignSaint
7 days ago
shiiiiiit

WaffleStake
7 days ago
the Joel Jamal rally

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
adelaide is getting taken over by pajeets

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
europa the last battle opened my eyes heavily recommend!

6
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
pretty sure everyone this side of the internet has seen it.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
yep he’s a kike

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
NeoNazi? We don’t call it that, call it what it is, say the whole thing

WaffleStake
7 days ago
if you’re a cop you’re a public figure to some degree

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
How is he sucking off jews?

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are a jew commie

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
leftie shit

@43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are the bitch

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
BAN 43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
go somewhere else

Euroic
7 days ago
But Joel, so are muslims.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they hate us cuz they anus

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Euroic
they will they hate each other more than they hate us

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
there we go Joel keep naming them

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Dave Lee was debating this non white immigrant this afternoon and pretty much she was a living example of the globohomo slave race and she couldn’t see it

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
I hope non-Whites do fight each other

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
who will fight each other

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
also there will be too many different groups

Euroic
7 days ago
Weimar Germany was not being flooded with millions of brown 3rd world subhumans. Our situation is far worse demographically.

10
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
the slave race is the ultimate goal

5
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a ponsy scheme

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
are Australians not able to say Jew anymore?

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
^^

Euroic
7 days ago
I wish Germany had won WW2

9
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NS is against parasitism , parasitism from above (the financial system )

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists hate the White working class the most.

6
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
private property, but even the richest man or largest company are not more important than the nation

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
We have to limit the financial system

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
you need to understand what democracy is – its a ratcheting system. The left comes in, advances satanic jewish ideas, the right comes in and normalises it “gay marriage is conservative”. They do this over and over.

3
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
They both agree on open borders too

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
They are basically on the same side. They are both anti-White.

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
Pretty much

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Fuck conservatism, they sided with the communists in WW2

4
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
conservatism is dead. with the death of charlie kirk, hopefully more people realize how useless it is. time for something else.

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes its really that simple. The “right” that win elections are likewise comprimised

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
conservatives are lefties

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
There ultimate goal is total White extinction. If you want to survive become a racial nationalist. Be racist or go extinct.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
He won’t do it because all of his grandchildren are jewish

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Yes

scoobyburn
7 days ago
O/ :illuminati_2: separation

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
That’s what they do when you become a liability to them, they hate all gentiles even if you bow down to them, they’ll still kill you if you step out of line just a little bit

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Some of the left say killing this man now is like killing hitler in 1932. That is where their minds are. How often have you heard that “if you had a time machine whats the first thing you would do?” – they always say go back in time to kill baby hitler. This is who they are

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
resistance is coming

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Kirk sucked Israel’s dick and still got shot.

4
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Who cares who did it, who benefits from it – lets make it us.

Euroic
7 days ago
The mainstream media told her its safe to be around niggers.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheBuckBreaker
This is exactly it. One of my modules was on the gender pay gap. The amount of jewish authors I had to reference was unbelievable.

Minister of Memes
7 days ago
They even had a module of anti-white abo propaganda in my Diploma of Accounting at TAFE. The vaguely named class was called “making decisions in a legal context”.

@Evola19
7 days ago
Young people also want to conform and in such a place they inevitably come out believing these dysgenic ideas

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes I have studied in higher education and this was my experience. Ideological brainwashing. Soviets used to make dissidents in the camps write pro-soviet works as a way to self brainwash, that is what universities do today. The kids brainwash themselves doing the work

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Hail Hitler o/

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yes that is true, “left” is too broad a term really

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
You guys better be carful talking shit about antifa and calling them terrorist, Striker and the TRS gang might call you whitetoids and sic their Arab donors on you guys

2
1
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Evola19
I think there are degrees of leftism ,this extreme maybe 5-10 % but some kind of leftie maybe 30 -40%

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists and mudsharks

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
suicidal empathy is part of our make up

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
lots

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
How many whites are left wing? How bad is it as a percentage

Euroic
7 days ago
Self-hating white leftist scum

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I heard the shooter had a tranny GF

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The life of one insect has more value than the lives of all left-wingers on earth combined.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The main issue is the right taking money from Israel and being pro-Israel.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
They would kill us

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Most likely

@Evola19
7 days ago
It just supresses them for a few years

@Evola19
7 days ago
They can list it as a terrorist organisation but another will be made called something else

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
Even if that was true that was never going to happen

@Evola19
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
Indeed

Euroic
7 days ago
Cuckservatives

1
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
back in the day, Obama was contemplating listing antifa as a terrorist organisation iirc

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Same with Charlie Kirk being assassinated, we know damn well Israel did it

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
antifa Jews same shit

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The Kosha Right

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Everyone knows 9/11 was Israel. Who benefits is the only question you need to ask.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nothing proves that jews did 9/11 other then dancing Israelis but we still blame Israel

Euroic
7 days ago
Antifa are terrorists but they won’t be outlawed because the serve the regime.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
The far left is a tool of Israel, anything they do is in the interest of Israel

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists are the ideological slaves of the regime. antifa want whatever their globalist masters tell them to want.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
When rittenhouse shot “Antifa” how many were jewish Joel

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I blame Israel and the far left

@Evola19
7 days ago
There is a lot of evidence are you not looking

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Israel itself is the global capital of pedophilia, tel aviv is the gayest city on earth, Isreal is the main manufacturer of hormone drugs for transgenderism – Israel is the literal throne of Satan on this earth.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t send your kids to school

@Evola19
7 days ago
feminism, multi-culturalism, transgenderism, homosexuality – all pushed by jews

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The left are so extreme and genocidal because they are led by jews. Everything left wing from female voting to civil rights is purely jewish led

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
By deception we shall do war

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Soon as it happened the first thing Netanyahu said was “Israel didn’t do this”

@Evola19
7 days ago
Netanyahu tweeted “He was murdered for speaking the truth”, yeah no shit.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Yep

@Evola19
7 days ago
Kirk was getting off script

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
The jewish guy arrested shouting “shoot me” then being released later and Netanyahu tweeting within minutes of the kill tells you who did it.

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Edward Dutton is right about these people

@Evola19
7 days ago
He was not one of ours

@Evola19
7 days ago
I had never heard about this guy until he was shot. That is why I have not fallen for the propaganda that “he was one of us” just because he had 2 blonde children, white skin and a wife. He was a traitor to his people. He was coming round sure, but he spent years shilling for jews and punching right

@Evola19
7 days ago
lol

@Evola19
7 days ago
This is why you dont make deals with the devil

@Evola19
7 days ago
The wages of sin are death. If you take money from jews to shill for Israel then start turning on them this is your reward

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
r

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
e

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
i

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
N

@Argo
7 days ago
tnd

@Argo
7 days ago
you’re on

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
now it is

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
it’s not letting me watch

0
0
==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript