Conference Speech – katana17

Joel Davis – The Goonright Pipeline – with Mark Collett – Aug 6, 2025 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:11:17 +0000

Joel Davis

The Goonright Pipeline

with Mark Collett

Wed, Aug 6, 2025

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and guest Mark Collett discuss his deportation from Sweden and being banned from travel to EU countries for 15 years, all because of his legal activism!

– KATANA]

https://rumble.com/v6x7hns-the-goonright-pipeline.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6

my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis

follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://whiteaustralia.org

Published on Wed, Aug 6, 2025

Description

1:49:53
Enable
The Goonright Pipeline
Joel Davis
6.67K followers
Follow
173
3
Repost
Comments
Share
Streamed on:
Aug 6, 6:16 am EDT
6.16K
News
Republican Politics
Goonright Joel and Blair Mark Collett Joel Davis Blair Cottrell Thomas Sewell Jacob Hersant National Socialist Network
follow Mark on telegram: https://t.me/markacollett
my social media links: https://bio.link/joeldavis
follow Blair on telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell
follow Tom on telegram: https://t.me/tomsewelluncensored
follow Jacob on telegram: https://t.me/herrcent
Show less
28 Comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 19,883 – Duration: 110 mins)

01 Introducing Special Guest Mark Collett from Patriotic Alternative, UK

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

04 No Right to Remain Silent

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

17 Big Demo on Saturday This Week in a Place Called Newark

18 Multiculturalism in Its Entirety is a Complete Failure!

19 Tommy’s Poisonous Message Supports Mass Immigration Except for Muslims

20 Joel on the “Goon Right”, Aka the “Horny Right”, or Pro-Sex Right

[Contents In Progress]

01 Introducing Special Guest Mark Collett from Patriotic Alternative, UK

top

Joel Davis: We are live. It is 6th August, 2025, and big stream for you this evening. We apologise for not being with you Sunday night. Things came up for Blair and Tom and I didn’t want to do the stream on my own. Not that I can’t do it on my own, I’ve done it on my own before. But the topic, it just wouldn’t have been as fun if it was me on my own. So I decided to save the stream. We decided to edge, we decided to hold our balls. And here we are on Wednesday and we have Mark Collett with us, our friend. I think he’s the first time he’s been on the show. We’ve gone on his show like a million times between us but nice to have Mark on the show all the way from sunny England and he’s been through some drama lately.

But first I just want to mention we have our national meet, our national conference this weekend. This is your last chance. If you want to get vetted and come White Australia.org go to White Australia.org. We just updated the website today actually it looks, it looks schmick, it looks clean. New update on the website. You can go there, you can sign up as a supporter and if you sign up as a supporter you can get an invite to get vetted and come to this weekend’s events.

On Saturday we have the White powerlifting event in the morning, in the afternoon we then have a festival that evening. We’re going to have music. Every different genre of music is going to happen. We’re going to have folk, we’re going to have RAC. We’re going to have rap music for the Zoomers, White nationalists. I know I didn’t sign off on this personally but there’s going to be White nationalist rap and there’s going to be a Sun and Rave late that evening which I’m particularly excited about. It’s going to be a jam packed evening and then on Sunday we’re going to have a conference, we’re going to do speeches. Where I get up to all kinds of shenanigans, it’s going to be huge. It’s going to be the biggest conference we’ve ever done. We’re expecting hundreds and hundreds of people. Be the biggest National Socialist conference to occur in the southern hemisphere maybe ever, at least outside of Argentina. So be there, White Australia.org.

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

top

But anyway, Mark, great to have you on the show. Obviously you made the news recently because you tried to go to Sweden, I believe to attend some kind of nationalist event. I don’t actually know what the event was.

And then you were not allowed basically into Sweden. You’re interned in the airport. And not only were you deported back to Britain, but you’re banned from the EU for 15 years, which is something that I haven’t really heard of before the dissidents.

There’s been many times where dissidents have been kicked out. But to be banned for 15 years is wild! And you didn’t actually do anything. You just showed up to speak at a conference. I’m sure you’ve travelled to Europe literally maybe 100 times in your life because you live in Europe. Must kind of suck being banned from the rest of the continent for 15 years. But what I’ve noticed lately, that political dissidents around the world are being treated worse and worse by Western governments. They’re blocking everyone from going to each other’s conferences. And this is probably the most egregious example of this year. So what exactly happened?

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll now only be referred to publicly as my new title, which is “The Most Dangerous Man in Europe”! A 15 year ban, de-banked from every bank and banned from every social media platform. There is literally no one in Europe who has experienced the level of political persecution that I have, where I actually, I can’t travel. And it’s not just Europe, you see, this is the Schengen Zone, which people might believe is just the freedom of movement countries that are part of the EU, but it actually extends to other European countries like Switzerland, that aren’t even in the EU.

So this is a really big deal! And legally it also extends to other countries that aren’t even in Europe. So this carries over to places like Canada and America. Once you’re placed on this list, you aren’t even free to travel to non-European countries. This will have a massive impact on my life and more so on my family’s life, because it means I can’t even take a foreign holiday with my kids. You would think this is the kind of treatment that would be reserved for someone like Carlos the Jackal or Osama Bin Laden or someone who is really in the public consciousness as sort of bad guy number one.

But that is reserved now for me, for an ethno-nationalist, because I was traveling to a peaceful, lawful social gathering, a community gathering at the Free Sweden, Summer Festival. You see, the Free Sweden, Movement is a group in Sweden that buys land and has acquired two villages which their members and supporters have moved to. They’ve taken over. They’ve clustered there. So all other ethnic groups do this, like Muslims, jews, blacks. When they come to the West, they all move to the same area of the country. They create their own centres, they buy up the local buildings, the community centres. They control the infrastructure, they build their own places of worship, and they then control those areas and run them to the benefit of their community. White people have started doing that now all over the world. They’re doing it in Sweden. And this is something that the government does not want to fund.

[05:29]

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

top

In fact, the government fears. And I was going over to Sweden to partake in this community social gathering, and I was going to make a short speech there. I was also going to have a meal on the Friday evening.

Whenever I travel abroad, I’m always ready at passport control to say exactly where I’m staying, to say who I’m meeting. I have the details of the people who are collecting me from the airport in case they need to call them. I have the details of the hotel, and I also have the details of my flight returning home so that I can prove exactly where I’m going, who I’ll be with and when I’ll be leaving, because they’re the basic requirements.

Now, I arrived in Sweden and I entered the queue to go through passport control and I was immediately approached by two police officers, a black man and a White woman. And I’m sure this was done for effect, …

Blair Cottrell: Was that before you scanned your passport or? Is that what happened?

Mark Collett: Yeah. You’re through passport control, they can’t do anything with you are then in Sweden and different laws apply.

However, when you are in the airport before passport controls, you are treated completely differently. The same is true in Britain. So in Britain, if you’re arrested in the airport, you are subject to normal British laws.

04 No Right to Remain Silent

top

However, if you’re arrested before you have scanned your passport and come through, you are subject to completely different laws. And just briefly, the laws are so different that if you were arrested the right side of passport control on British soil, leaving the airport, you have a right to remain silent. You have a right to legal representation. You can say:

“I don’t want to say a word until my solicitor gets here.”

You have a right to contact people or make a phone call. However, if you are arrested before passport control in Britain, you have no right to legal representation. You can be held indefinitely, you have no right to contact anyone, and you have no right to maintain your silence. And such is the coercive nature of this, you are actually compelled under law to hand over all of the passwords for any device you’re carrying, and failure to do so means you are immediately guilty of a terror offence where you can be jailed for up to five years.

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

top

Blair Cottrell: That sounds familiar. I had my whole house searched by Australian Federal police just a couple of weeks ago and they told me the same thing. So those laws must have been copy pasted.

Mark Collett: Yep!

Blair Cottrell: As part of Australian terror legislation. They said you’re assumed guilty of a serious offence and that you’re trying to hide it if you don’t unlock your device and you can be jailed for up to five years.

So as I said, familiar with that particular piece of legislation. But so they approached you before you scanned your passport, meaning they knew you were coming.

Mark Collett: They knew I was coming. They pulled me out. It was a black male with a shaved head and like one of those Muslim sort of beard things around the bottom of his neck and White woman who looked like she could have been a model.

And I think they sort of paired them together to see if I would overreact or I turn into the devil, take on another form when I see two police officers that are racially mixed. You know, my horns start to show and a tail, you know, comes out of my back and then my wings sprout!

And at that point they can just jail me indefinitely.

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

top

But obviously I took this in my stride. I was honest with them. Then they took me to a room and interrogated me. They interrogated me on everything as well, I mean, absolutely everything! So like where I went to school, where I grew up my family, do I have children. They even pulled up pictures of my ex-girlfriend on like a computer monitor.

Blair Cottrell: What was the point of that? For what purpose?

Mark Collett: Well, you see, the thing is, I am quite a cheeky person and when people are sort of questioning me, I’ll always try to sort of inject a little bit of levity into the situation. So the black guy says:

“You know, can you explain this?”

And obviously he was pointing at her large swastika tattoo when he said, can you explain this?

And I said:

“Well look, I can.”

And they both sort of looked at me and said:

“What’s he gonna say?”

I said:

“Well, I was in my mid-30s, I was going through a bit of a dry patch with relationships. And then it’s extremely hot but extremely crazy girl approached me and you, …”

And I point out, I said:

“You know what it’s like when you get the hot crazy thing. You just dive straight in! And it’s an amazing ride, but it’s like a roller coaster. One minute it’s up, one minute it’s down!”

And he starts laughing.

And then the woman sort of looks over and so, like:

“You’re not going to laugh. You stop, Stop! This is meant to be serious!”

And he’s laughing and he’s like:

“Oh, you don’t need this to explain this one to me!”

And he’s like, getting with it. I said:

“But then she moves in and it gets even crazy and you can’t handle it. And, oh, my God!”

But you know what? And I was about to talk, and he was like:

“Say no more!”

And then she starts to giggle. And it sort of broke the sort of tension in the room. But they were asking everything.

[11:05]

And then eventually, when they’d asked all their questions, they sort of kicked me out of the room. I sat in this sort of holding area, which was very relaxed. They did offer me. They said:

“Would you like a coffee? Would you like water? No food, but just coffee and water.”

I said:

“No, thanks. I don’t drink coffee.”

I only drink like energy drinks. And I wasn’t really in the mood for anything and I wasn’t going to be cheeky, but, like, I’ll fetch me a Red Bull or anything like that. I was just like:

“Look, I’m gonna sit here and wait.”

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

top

So I sat there and then I thought, can I get out of the room? Which I figured out I could. And I had sort of a little wander because I need to go to the toilet. And then I came back, sat down, and they sort of come and grab me. Took a few hours, took me back into the room. This time there’s four officers present.

And then they read me this judgement. And the judgement is the most insane thing you’ve ever heard! They begin by telling me I’m going to be denied entry and that I’m going to be banned for 15 years from the Schengen Zone because:

“I’m a threat to public order, a threat to the fundamental fabric of society, and a threat to the values on which Sweden and the EU were built!”

And I’m like:

“Oh, my God!”

I’m sat there at this point. And then immediately I go for my phone because I want to text somebody and say:

“Look, this is getting serious!”

And they’re like:

“No, put the phone down, you’re not allowed to touch your phone.”

And then like, they all start coming towards me because there’s four of them at this point. And I’m like:

“Oh, God!”

So they go through all the stuff they asked me if I accept what they’ve said and so you can sign it to say you understand, but you don’t have to sign it. But if you don’t sign it makes no difference. I was being a little bit, sort of silly. I said:

“Well, the signature might be worth something one day, so here you go.”

And I signed it, put pushed the paperwork back over. They said:

“Have I got anything left to say?”

And I said:

“No.”

Obviously at this point I’ve not got my luggage, I’ve not got my passport, all I’ve got is what’s in my hand luggage. And they’re like:

“Look you are going to be taken out of Sweden now.”

So they start walking me, two of the women then start walking me back to the departure lounge. I said:

“Well, what’s going to happen?”

They’re like:

“Well, we’ll book you on a plane or you can you could always book yourself on one.”

And I’m like:

“Well, I can’t book myself on one because I haven’t got a passport and I can’t board anything because I haven’t got a passport and I don’t know where my luggage is.”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

top

And this is where the real ordeal starts. For 25 hours I sat in the departure lounge. No word from the authorities, no word from the police, no food, no water, no bed, no access to my luggage, which contained all like my toothbrush, my toothpaste, change of clothes, etc, all I had was my hand luggage which had a little games console in it, one of my big Hoodies which was like so good that it had that Hoodie in there because that’s what kept me sort of warm, had my charging cables, it had a fast charger which I couldn’t use because my bloody travel adapters were in my luggage. And there was no way I was spending like 20 quid on a new travel adapter to use it for like one day. There’s absolutely no way I was doing that. And all I could eat was what’s in the airport. And the airport is like the most expensive place in the world to eat. I think a burger and chips with a drink would have been about 30 pounds. So I was like, no way am I doing that.

But they have these little, these hot dog machines in Sweden and there’s like six different flavours of hot dogs and they were only a couple of pounds each.

So I was just basically living off these hot dogs and cans of Coke, own cans of Red Bull. And I did that for 25 hours whilst I sleeping on these sort of seats so sleeping on these seats, it was really not particularly good. And I went to the departure terminals and I looked at when there was flights and I kind of guessed which flight it would be, to be honest, because there was only one direct flight back and they weren’t legally allowed to fly me via any other country.

So there were loads of flights back, but they all had a short layover of like 50 minutes. But I wasn’t allowed to legally touch down in another country.

Blair Cottrell: Have you been to Sweden before, Mark?

[15:16]

Mark Collett: Yeah, and this is the incredible thing. I’ve been to Europe loads of times, tons of different European countries. I’ve even done work in the European Parliament.

And on top of that, I’ve given speeches from about 2017 onwards, I’ve been consistently making speeches on European soil. I’ve never broken the law. There’s never been any criminality, any disorder. There’s never been any trouble at any of these events that I’ve spoken at. I’ve not got a criminal record. You know, I’m a family man, I’m a law abiding citizen. Everything I said was lawful, everything I was planning to say was lawful. This was just pure political persecution.

And just a few months ago I spoke in Finland at an event and Finland’s another Nordic country. There’s freedom of movement between the Nordic countries to get to Finland. You know, sometimes you, I’ve gone to Finland before and had a layover in Sweden. I’ve spoken in Sweden before.

So all the precedents were that as I was somebody with a clean criminal record, somebody who had a place to stay, contacts in Sweden, somebody who’d been there before, who travelled extensively to Europe and had never ever been involved in any disorder, criminality or immoral or unlawful activity, there was no reason to stop me, detain me, let alone deport me or ban me. But this is basically what we have to put up with but the really shocking thing was the 15 year ban! Because 15 years is an incredibly long period of time. That’s the kind of thing you’d expect for somebody who had been maybe a gun runner, or a terrorist or involved in some kind of major financial fraud across international boundaries. But this is for a 25 or 30 minute speech and they were so bothered about this 25 or 30 minute speech, they were willing to take away all my rights, treat me horrendously.

And this is all at a time where migrants are turning up on European shores without any paperwork, any background checks are being immediately taken to hotels, being given the finest food, being given, you know, clothes, being given, spending money, always have a bed to sleep in. If they’d have treated a migrant like that, there would have been a queue of human rights lawyers, you know, round the block waiting to represent them. And through the whole time I was there, I was never offered representation, I was never allowed to have somebody present with me when I was being questioned. The whole thing, you know, it was a bit of an ordeal.

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

top

And eventually, after 25 hours, they walk through the terminal, they get hold of me, they march me off to a gate, they have my passport and a fresh boarding pass in a bag. They board me first in front of everyone, like:

“Look, this is a dangerous guy!”

You know, everyone’s looking because it’s like:

“Why has the police got this one guy? Why is he being sat near the front of the plane?”

You know, they take you down, they’re about to watch you walk on the plane when they’ve got you in that sort of like extendable arm that goes from the airport to the plane, that’s when they give your passport back and then they watch you walk onto the plane once you’re on the plane and the passport’s being given back, etc, etc. That is when they leave and obviously then you’re flown back.

And luckily I passed through Manchester airport without any like, bother. It was the plane arrived early and I got home safe and sound. But it was weird because I left Friday morning at sort of 5:30 AM my time. That’s when I left my house and I got back Saturday night at about 11:00 PM.

So I was gone sort of maybe about 40 hours, but it really felt and technically I hadn’t been gone a day because I’d seen the wife and kids Friday morning before I left and I saw them Saturday night when I got home, but it felt a lot longer and it was quite stressful, but it was certainly an experience and I think it’s opened a lot of people’s eyes to just how biased the system is, how tyrannical the system is and how it targets nationalists.

Blair Cottrell: Oh, we’re definitely! I can sense and feel, and as a result of your story and a few other stories, what I’ve experienced recently, we’re on a new tier of oppression. Even though, as I said on Hermes stream just yesterday or the day before, there’s a lot more meme slop, Nazi memes being allowed on X and Instagram and stuff. The people who actually have potential to produce community organisations, political parties and actually affect politics in a real world way, these individuals are being targeted more than ever!

So even though there’s this illusion on a surface level of more free speech being allowed on social media, here in the real world for people like us, things are really being ramped up. You can really feel that. Can you do anything about this? Have you looked into ways.

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

top

Mark Collett: I want to comment on what you’ve just said. This has been something that’s been happening a lot. So I think the system knows that people are annoyed.

And I think if I’d taken the path of being Mark Collett, the content creator and all I’d ever done was produce videos and social media posts, I think I’d be back on YouTube now. I think I’d be on X. Because they want to allow a certain degree of freedom to cool things off. And the freedom they want to allow is they want to allow some talking heads on X on YouTube so that people can log on and think:

“This is all going in the right direction. We got somebody on YouTube again, like Mark, who’s going to speak our language. I can watch that. It feels good. Somebody’s regurgitating points that I would make myself. I can listen to him and I feel like somebody’s speaking for me.”

Then they log off and they do nothing else.

[21:21]

However, what they’re really scared of and what they’re clamping down on is people like myself saying:

“I want to be more than a content creator. I want to organise in the real world. I want people to get out there to protest, to demonstrate. To organise, to be involved in legal advocacy, to be involved in activism.”

That’s what they fear. We saw this with Patriotic Alternative. We saw it with the NJP. We’ve seen it with the Nordic Resistance in Sweden. We’ve seen it with White Australia, with you guys down under. We’ve seen it extensively in Canada with the anti-Covid trucker movement. They were de-platformed. They had all their money taken from them. Many of them were arrested.

But if you’re just going to talk online, they are giving people a bit of breathing space. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing! I want more people talking online, but the real tip of the spear is people who want to do some form of real world community activity. We’re the ones who are being done.

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

top

And in terms of, can I fight this? I am putting in an appeal. I’ve got 21 days. The Free Sweden, Movement have said that they’re going to fund that. They’ve got a lawyer acting. I sent in very promptly. So yesterday I had my full statement of facts worked out, because all I can really do is give a statement of fact and my statement of fact, I can give you the kind of thing I’ve put in my statement of fact. It’s like what I travelled for, what I was going to do, whether I’ve committed crime before, where I’ve been to before, and literally the things I’ve just told you now.

So I just list all the facts and then at the end, say:

“Based on all of the factual evidence presented, this is a undemocratic and disproportionate punishment for somebody who has never committed a crime and was not intending to commit a crime.”

But whether the appeal will be successful, I don’t know. Because one thing that strikes you really hard when you’re in this situation is you’ve seen so many reports in the mainstream media of migrant rapists, migrant criminals, all being represented by human rights lawyers and being told that they won’t be deported because they’ve got human rights. And deporting them would be hard for them and their family.

But then you’re sat there and they’re in no human rights! There’s no one queuing up to help you. There’s no excuses, there’s no:

“Well, it might hurt your feeling, it might impact your family, it might affect your ability to take your children on holiday.”

There’s none of that.

But here in the UK, if you’re trying to deport a migrant rapist who’s got a kid on UK soil, it’s:

“Well you can’t deprive that child of his dad. You can’t!”

There’s been people who have said things like:

“I’m really fond of the food in the UK. And it would damage my digestive system if I had to go back to my native country and eat the slop they serve. So, oh, well, we better let him stay then. He likes the food!”

It’s any excuse, really. But for people like us, that it’s not that there are no excuses. You can’t even make legitimate arguments and no one’s willing to make a legitimate argument on your behalf.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, it seems like in the same way that certain talking heads are allowed on social media to placate the consumers, as you were suggesting, these are legal avenues which apparently exist for us to defend ourselves or make complaints. They all seem to be a road to nowhere, don’t they? It’s just like a waste of time and money. If you’re a dissident, you don’t actually have any rights. It’s very corrupt.

Mark Collett: Well, on the issue that, I want to say one last thing. When you said waste of time and money. So you also noticed that I went through this and I’ve not asked for anything. There was no donation button, there was no special support fund. There was no grifting Canadian, you know, lawyer going and making YouTube videos saying:

“You know, save Mark Collett!”

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

top

There’s no, you know, raft of domain names that were prepared 48 hours before I flew save Mark Collett.com or get Mark back from Sweden.com. There was none of that I paid for the airport food myself. I paid for the train fares to and from the airport myself. I got back home, dealt with it, didn’t have anyone pick me up, didn’t need a defense fund. You don’t need to grift off anything.

And compare that to Tommy Robinson who recently, you know, knocked somebody out at a station and this guy had to be resuscitated and put in intensive care. He fled to Spain, was allowed to walk into Spain and because he was going to be arrested when he got back, there was a, you know, Save Tommy fund set up before he even arrived back in the UK. People donating tens of thousands of pounds.

But for somebody like me, we do it the honest way. We’re not here to sort of nickel and dime anyone over the slightest issue. It’s a bad issue, but I also wanted to set a precedent when this happened that we don’t always need to start rattling a tin and begging for cash the minute something, you know, goes slightly wrong. Because we’re a lot better than people like the Tommy Robinsons and the Avi Yemenis and all the others who were just in it to make money and to basically lead people down a dead end street.

Blair Cottrell: Well, Tommy’s got a lot of hand rubbers around him, so he might not even come up with those schemes himself. They probably you know, cook up ideas like that, how they can leverage and exploit certain circumstances he finds himself in.

[26:54]

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

top

Joel Davis: Well, no, Tommy loves the cocaine and like one of the best, like cocaine activities is coming up with business ideas. So he’s probably sitting there doing lines of coke with all these kikes and just scheming, you know.

Blair Cottrell: Is that like a confirmed thing that he likes the cocaine or you’re just making it?

Joel Davis: Oh yeah, man!

Mark Collett: No, no, no!

Joel Davis: The nose rubbing is out of control.

Mark Collett: Sniffing, nose rubbing, licking his lips. If you watch him as well, whenever he does a he’s always going backwards and forwards, sort of shaking, he’s very red in the face. I’ve known a lot of lads who’ve liked some of the white stuff and he seems to be in late stage as an observation. Allegedly. He looks like he’s the kind of guy who’s in late stage, sort of cocaine addiction where, …

Blair Cottrell: Well, I suppose cocaine’s its a lot more available, isn’t it, in England? Like there’s not many cocaine addicts in Australia.

Joel Davis: What are you talking about?

Blair Cottrell: It’s a lot more expensive to get. So well, not unless you really like what?

Joel Davis: There’s plenty of cocaine. I don’t know what you’re talking about, but, …

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, I don’t know, who you run with Joel Davis, but I don’t know any. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: I’ll hang out with you! Not saying anything.

Mark Collett: Yeah, well, Tommy was very, … Recently, Keith Woods. It might, not recently, maybe six months ago, maybe a year ago.

Joel Davis: Is Keith Woods on the fucking powder these days?

Mark Collett: Well, no, Keith Woods made a comment about Tommy on X. And Tommy had like a meltdown and the way he was acting to the camera, you could see his eyes were bulging, they were bright red, he was twitching his nose, he was rocking back and forward. His behaviour, he doesn’t look like he’s a guy who is all together there anymore.

And I think you know his recent behaviour as well. Sort of whacking that guy in the train station, you know, 64 year old guy, knocking him out. I don’t know, I think if I, if I’d have done something like that, all my close friends would have been like:

“Mate, what’s going wrong?”

You know, if it’s a 64 year old guy shouting something like, you just walk away, you know, hitting somebody like that it’s not some sort of, it’s not some big honourable win, is it? It’s not like you fought off, you know, 20 Muslims in the station, it’s not like you transformed into John Wick and did something really amazing! You whacked some old fellow and left him in a coma.

Blair Cottrell: Who knows, inside his own mind, who knows how glorious that moment really was? Look, you don’t know, right? I get it, and I agree. Because especially when you’ve got a reputation, a public reputation, like Tommy Robinson, you’re going to have people who approach you and want to shake your hand, and you’re going to have people who don’t like you as well. Used to happen to me down here in Australia.

But, you know, it may have just been that perfect storm of circumstances, and that was the last thing, the straw that broke the camel’s back on that particular day. You know, it might have been a fight with the wife in the morning and then screaming kids all the way to the station. And then something else. You know what I mean? Yeah.

Mark Collett: Five lines of coke! Ezra’s on the phone demanding another fundraiser. And finally somebody goes:

“Oi, Tommy! You’re racist bastard!”

In the next minute, that’s it.

Blair Cottrell: I mean, Ezra says:

“Hey, perfect. Good idea, Tommy. That’s the perfect thing we need. Let’s start the fundraisers to free Tommy from legal consequence for his, … Improvised. Good man!”

But [chuckling] anyway, hey, I’m sorry that happened to you, man! It was like, especially they didn’t give you a hotel or anything. You’re laying on those airport chairs trying to sleep under a Hoodie.

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

top

Mark Collett: But the craziest thing was there was a Muslim woman as well in there, and she come from France, and for some reason they were trying to send her back to Paris. So it wasn’t like somebody said:

“Oh, well, they were deporting a Muslim as well!”

Well, deporting her back to Paris. But they weren’t sending her back to Beirut or [chuckling] something like that they were sending her to Paris, probably where she was born, London and Paris are just completely overwhelmed. But the weird thing was I was doing a stream with Red Ice and she started squawking because I was making too much noise. And then she sort of called over like a police officer, and I was like:

“Oh, man, I don’t need this as well.”

And then later on, she came over to where I was and asked for my Hoodie. She was like, because I got this big White Hoodie which is dead comfortable and it’s like an oversized one. And that was like my life saving. She’s like:

“Oh, I’m all cold!”

She didn’t speak English, but she tried broken English. She was like, rubbing her arms like:

“I’m cold. Give me your Hoodie.”

And I’m like:

“Yeah, you’re not having my Hoodie.”

Blair Cottrell: All you had to cover yourself. The only item that you really had, that Hoodie, a random Muslim being deported tried to take that from you! [chuckling]

Mark Collett: Yeah. She’s like:

“I’m gonna be cold!”

I was like:

“Yeah, but if I give it to you, then I’m gonna be cold as well. It’s like, if I had two Hoodies, you know, I’d consider it. But I only have one Hoodie and it’s for me.”

And later on, she came over and she’s like:

“Oh, my phone charger’s not working.”

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

top

Obviously you didn’t say my phone charger. But she sort of did the pointing and showing. And she was like:

“Can you fix my phone charger?”

So I was like, God! And I went and fixed her phone charger for her. It was just comical. It was I’m trapped there for being the world’s biggest racist. You know, I’ve just been designated the most dangerous man in Europe. Yet, there’s a Muslim woman trapped in there with me, and she’s literally depending on me to keep her warm and charge her phone. I genuinely think that says a lot about the European spirit and the way that immigration genuinely works or doesn’t work, [chuckling] depending on your perspective.

[32:26]

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! Good analogy. And it really is in our nature, isn’t it, to just lend assistance when requested?

Mark Collett: Well, I’m never rude to anyone. This is the thing. I think I’m the least rude person in the world! I think I’ve only ever really sworn on stream, like, seriously, maybe, like, twice. And that was at somebody who couldn’t get a computer game working and hadn’t downloaded the maps. You know I’m generally a pretty chilled guy, except for when I’m gaming and getting angry with people. But, like I’m never rude to anyone. I’m not rude to anyone of who’s from an ethnic minority. I’m just generally quite pleasant. And if anyone wants to interview me or talk to me or whatever, I’m always sort of friendly and polite to everyone I meet. I’ve got this policy of being kind to everybody unless they do something bad to me, because I like to present the best face possible for our cause.

Yet I have been treated worse than anyone! And that’s just the crazy thing. And people actually contacted me saying, of all people that they’ve stopped going into Europe because, again, people like Tommy Robinson, who’ve got, like, extensive criminal records, are allowed to travel freely. But me, somebody who has no criminal record and is always makes pains to be so polite and reasonable to everyone is absolutely crapped upon! And then my wife’s on the phone and she’s like:

“I can’t believe this!”

She’s [chuckling] like:

“What if they don’t let you come home? What are we gonna do?”

She’s like:

“What if they detain you at Manchester for 48 hours? How are we gonna deal with this?”

And obviously, it puts a lot of stress on my family. It puts a lot of stress on the wife. Your friend Dan Pal, he rang me when I was in the airport to say hello!

Blair Cottrell: Really? Wow!

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] because, you see, when he rang, he was like:

“Hi, you trapped!”

I was like:

“Hi, mate, how you doing?”

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

top

It’s like [chuckling] the amount of people that rang me from all over the world was really heartening!

And I’ve got to say, joking aside, that was the thing that kept me going. You guys messaged me. People from America, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, people from all over Europe messaged me. Sasha Rossmuller, Marcus in Sweden, Henrik and Lana. I’m gonna forget some names here, but just everyone who rang me and messaged me. From the bottom of my heart, thank you! That’s what keeps you smiling, like you’re there. You don’t know what’s going to happen. They also give you, like, subtle threats like:

“Oh, well, we might make you pay for your own flight back.”

And you’re like:

“Oh, God!”

But, you know, everyone messaging you and sort of like keeping your spirits up and sharing, like, memes and stuff. No Chance in Scotland. He was great! You know, all these people, that’s what kept you smiling.

And I’ve always said from day one that we are creating a community, and community, like brotherhood in-group preference. That’s the important thing! And when it comes through, that’s worth more than anything. That’s worth more than a, you know, Avi Yemeni, you know, Israeli fundraiser. What matters is knowing that you’ve got White people all over the world who’ve got your back.

And that’s why they’re so scared. They’re scared because when they crapped on me, they saw thousands of people tens of thousands in my corner outraged! And that’s what they’re worried about. They’re worried about a White community with in-group preference that organises in a peaceful manner.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! It does seem that way. And it almost seems like they’re getting desperate. I actually think they run things through AI estimating models.

And basically what the AI is telling them is:

“Unless you shut this down, unless you target the main figureheads for this community, this thing is going to become huge! This thing is going to get out of control. Everyone’s going to vote for these guys and this is going to be the next big political thing.”

17 Big Demo on Saturday This Week in a Place Called Newark

top

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’ve got a big demo on Friday. Sorry, not Friday. Big demo on Saturday this week in a place called Newark.

And when I was on social media, you know, I’d million viewed videos on YouTube, massive YouTube account. I had a massive Twitter account with 60,000 followers before Musk I was getting tweets which were viewed by millions of people. I had incredible interactions on there. They know that if I had that back, this demo this weekend, there might be 5,000 people there. But they’re absolutely, …!

And none of this is getting me down either because like I’m out this weekend demonstration. I don’t care! I’m going to be there. I’m gonna be at the forefront, I’m going to be making a speech, I’m going to be speaking my mind. I’m not going to be changing my message. This is about ensuring the future of White Britons. And that’s what it’s all always been about the number one issue of today is the future of White people! And they don’t want anyone saying that.

They don’t mind Tommy standing up. And the reason they don’t mind Tommy standing up is he’s got a really subversive message. His message is:

“That multiculturalism fundamentally works. It’s all okay and it chugs along. But the spoke in the wheel is just these Muslims. And if we get rid of the Muslims, but we keep the jews, the blacks, the Hindus, the Sikhs in the we keep the West Indians. If we celebrate the Windrush generation, if we keep the gay Pride events, that’s all going to be good and it’ll all work. But it’s just the Muslims that spoil it because they don’t like the gay pride and they’re not that fond of the Indians and they do bad things to White people. If you get rid of them. And they’re a threat to the jews, of course! Get rid of them, society will be great.”

[38:13]

18 Multiculturalism in Its Entirety is a Complete Failure!

top

Well, that’s absolute crap! Because multiculturalism in its entirety is a complete failure! And what they’re scared of is someone like me saying:

“No, multiculturalism doesn’t work. We don’t want any of them here. We don’t want the West Indians here. We don’t want the Indians here. We don’t want the Muslims here. We don’t want the jews here. We want a country for White Britons, just like everyone else has got. We want a country!”

And that’s what they’re scared of and when we were having big demos a few years ago outside migrant hotels, hundreds of people were turning up to hear me speak. And I was the only one that would get up in front of a big crowd and say:

“Look, do you want White people to be a minority in Britain?”

19 Tommy’s Poisonous Message Supports Mass Immigration Except for Muslims

top

And I’d give them the demographics on London and Birmingham and the rates at which people were coming in. And the establishment was scared. And then Tommy will come out, counter that. He’ll make threats about me. He has people threaten me online. Because his message is, it’s got nothing to do with being White. It’s about shared values. Muslims don’t embody these shared values. Well, that’s a poisonous message! Because I don’t care whether White Britons are replaced by Muslims or blacks or Indians. If White Britons are replaced, they’re replaced. And it’s the end of us! And it doesn’t matter how the end of us comes. If we’re not there, we’re not there! It’s about fighting for our survival. That’s what it’s all about.

And that’s why he is backed by the State. It’s why his YouTube account’s been reactivated. It’s why Musk is bigging up his X-account. Because his message ultimately calms the people but leads to the same eventuality, which is White erasure.

Blair Cottrell: Very well said. Well said! And thanks for joining us tonight, mate. Thanks, everybody. In the comments, comments are popping off. We’ve got a lot of live viewers. Any thoughts? Joel Davis?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I want to switch gears now because, yeah, I think we’ve discussed that.

Blair Cottrell: And just so you know, Joel’s. Joel’s been, like, harping on the last few days about this “Goon Right” concept. He can’t stop talking about the Goon Right.

And I’m not exactly sure what he means by it. So he’s going to start explaining This, I think this is the gear he’s shifting into him. All right, because it’s like he’s sitting there. He can’t wait.

Mark Collett: Come on, mate.

20 Joel on the “Goon Right”, Aka the “Horny Right”, or Pro-Sex Right

top

Joel Davis: I’ve been edging the whole stream. I’ve been edging the whole stream. No.

Well, so basically “Gooning” is like Zoomer speak for entering into some kind of trance like state through masturbatory excess. And it’s become somewhat of a meme that corresponds to just general horniness.

And so this notion of like the “Goon Right” has come to become somewhat of a meme on the fringe. It is going to gain in momentum in the coming months and years as a label. But the Goon Right is basically the horny Right. It’s basically a pro-sex Right.

Now this is interesting because for a very long time, a very long time period, I would say from at least from the 1960s onwards, at least up to the 20s and tens, early 20s and tens, the Left-Right distinction was generally characterized by the Left being supposedly on the side of sex, supposedly on the side of degeneracy and liberation, sexual liberation. It had the youth energy, it was what the cool kids were doing. And the Right were these stuffy Christian conservatives who were saying:

“No, you shouldn’t be having any fun and you should wait until marriage and you shouldn’t do drugs and you shouldn’t listen to rock and roll. That’s satanic, that’s evil!”

And there was this kind of dichotomy and this kind of youth rebellion against that paradigm, because obviously this Christian conservative ethos was previously the dominant moral paradigm in terms of how sexuality is regulated in the West.

However, obviously that’s completely outmoded because at this point in history, no one cares about those Christian conservative values, frankly. They’ve been, they’ve become an entirely fringe subset of society. Even the people who call themselves Christians or who go to church, they don’t really embody these values in any kind of traditional way, almost to a man, and a woman. And we live in a completely different paradigm where of dating apps and you know, live stream Internet pornography and so on, where sexual morality and this and the kind of sexual paradigm is completely changed.

Where now the dominant sexual morality is not Christian conservatism, now it’s feminism. Now the moralisers are on the Left and they’re telling you basically that:

“Well, don’t be too feminine because then you’re being too submissive to the male gaze. And this is Patriarchal, this is horrible! And for women to be liberated, they have to be less sexy. They have to wear a pants suit. And men aren’t allowed to express any kind of sexual vitality, otherwise they’re creepy, otherwise they’re rapists!”

And sex scandals are now about sexual assault more so than sexual exuberance, basically. And the Left has become increasingly unsexy.

There’s nothing less sexy than transgenderism. Transgenderism is basically the annihilation of sexuality. They call it a sexual identity, but really it’s a antisexual identity. Because sexuality is built on a polarity between the masculine and the feminine. When you annihilate that, you actually annihilate that difference. You also annihilate sexual energy itself. Which is why the people on the Left don’t seem like the kind of people to be having a lot of sex, or they don’t seem to be particularly sexy.

In fact, we’ve done the studies on this. The more attractive a woman is, the more Right-wing her political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact.

[44:12]

Also, the higher testosterone a male is, the more Right-wing his political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact. This has been reproduced in literature over and over again! And so women who are liked by men and men who have high testosterone, virility, this is essentially what the Right is made up of, on average. And the Left is increasingly made up of feminine men and masculine women. And what, that’s what feminism fundamentally is. It’s an androgynous ideology. It’s an ideology that femininity is submissive to the masculine and therefore as a result of that, it’s something to be ashamed of and that women should become more masculine and men should become more feminine, so that they can be put into a submissive position.

And so now the feminist moralisers that rule our society, this “gynocracy”, if you will, they want to make men jump through hoops for pussy, basically. You have to be a good little boy! You have to not step outside of the realms of their moral structures or whatever. Otherwise you have to be alienated. This is particularly the case in public life, political life the whole Me Too movement, etc.

And so increasingly, sex is Right-wing, particularly a kind of traditional sexuality of women trying to basically attune themselves to the male gaze and to male desires, whether it be Sydney Sweeney having huge tits and having great genes, as we’ve seen recently. This is fundamentally anti-woke and Right-wing coded because she’s got blonde hair and blue eyes and it’s an obvious wink, wink, nudge, nudge to the fact that she’s got Nordic genes. Not just blue jeans on.

But also we see at the same time what is the Right associated with things like pickup artistry, looks maxing, male sexual vitality in general and male sexual assertion, sovereignty. What is like the typical, like Right-wing memes for women. Things like the Trad wife. What is the Trad wife? The Trad wife is a woman who basically subordinates herself to the ideal of femininity as desired by a man rather than trying to be a feminist girl boss to impress other women.

And so when you think about it, the Alt-Right always was like a Gooner movement because it all began according to like the meme history with Gamergate. If people remember what Gamergate was, it was a movement in 1914, sorry, 2014, 2015 online, of people who were into video games, who were getting upset at how feminists had taken over video game journalism and were criticising every game for sexualizing women too much and demanding that video game developers make women’s tits smaller and more covered up. More realistic, they would say. More realistic depictions of women that don’t make women feel inadequate and don’t reinforce, you know, Patriarchal White supremacy or whatever.

And so basically they started making video games less hot, less fun, less sexy. And the nerds rose up, the gamers rose up, and created the anti-SJW, anti-woke movement that was basically the kindling of the Alt-Right. Then of course you have Donald Trump coming to power. Who is the Gooner in Chief?

Up until Donald Trump in Right-wing politics, sex scandals would kill your career. You would basically be done for. If you were on tape saying “you can grab her by the pussy”, when you’re famous, they’ll just let you do it. That famous line. But no, Trump not only grabbed her by the pussy, but he also grabbed the presidency against the feminist in a pantsuit.

And so it was the horny Gooner, Donald Trump who basically won and defeated the Wokes. Total woke obliteration. That was the kind of that was the vibe of the times.

And so in many ways you could see this kind of transvaluation of Right-wing moralism where Donald Trump would be asked about his thoughts on Christianity and he would say he was a Christian, but when they asked him about his actual beliefs, he would expose himself as not actually being a Christian. They asked him what his favourite part of The Bible was. And he famously said, “that’s personal”. And they said:

“Well, what do you like better, New Testament or Old Testament?”

And he said he likes both the same:

“They’re both excellent!”

What did he say?:

“I always say Art of the Deal, second best book of all time behind the Bible.”

So Donald Trump kind of exposed the fact that he wasn’t really a Christian. He was just saying that he was to get votes, he thought. And it was very blatant and obvious. It was very vulgar.

Now, of course, Donald Trump is a Zionist piece of shit and he’s a shill. But this was still an archetypal transvaluation of Right-wing politics, where the kind of stuffy conservative, you know, family man who has no sexual exuberance, that was completely marginalised. And instead have a new paradigm where the Right could be sexy and the Left, as I said, it used to be in the 60s and the 70s, supposedly this fun movement of like sex, drugs and rock and roll and like, just let people live, man! And then now it has become like this moral busy bodies that are trying to destroy everyone’s fun.

[49:23]

Of course, we had the MeToo movement, various other scandals, as I mentioned. And you can see it takes shape that essentially this is the new paradigm where it’s not about Christianity vs degeneracy, it’s about masculine virility, feminine sexuality, versus this androgynous feminist cult that is basically what the Left has become. These stuffy moralisers that want to impose political correctness and all of these moral regulations upon us. And so I think the Right needs to embrace this.

You know, one thing that I’ve always noticed whenever we do press conferences, is that the journalists from the ABC, which is a Left-wing institution that isn’t commercial, that’s publicly funded, that their reporters are always ugly women! Every single woman who works for the ABC is ugly! They don’t have one hot chick there. But the Channel 7 reporters are usually pretty cute.

Now, I’m not saying Channel 7 is Right-wing, but you can see this, like whenever there’s a Left-wing coded institution, basically ugly women rise up, take key positions of power, and then assert a radical Leftist ideology upon the rest of us. Because the reason why they don’t want a traditional sexual value system where women are basically graded upon how sexually attractive they are to the male sex, how much they please men, as opposed to being viewed through some other lens. Well, if you’re an ugly woman, if you’re an unattractive woman, that sounds horrible because you’re not going to be at the top of the chain!

So you can see them basically entering into an alliance, as I said, with low that beta male orbiter types who make up the conventional Leftists. And these people aren’t sexy, they aren’t full of vitality.

So I think the Right needs to embrace this rather than having this kind of traditionalist, you know, anti-sex attitude that many elements on the Right still have. I think we have to channel this. I think we have to embrace Goonerism, we have to embrace sex. We have to embrace the fact that the hot women are on our side. We have to embrace the fact that our kind of politics is sexy, that we are liberating. We are the liberators! It is the Left that are the moralisers now and we are the liberators of sexual energy. We are the youth movement! We’re the ones that are on the side of freedom, on the side of vitality. And I see that to be something that is really coming into focus.

And it’s also becoming quite relevant because there’s been quite a few sex scandals of late, let’s say, on the Right, on the far-Right even. There’s a recent case with Aarrvol, the leader of the Return to the Land project, which got a lot of headlines. And what I noticed was that basically he was exposed for essentially making pornography 10 years ago with his now ex-wife. That all got exposed.

And I think a few years ago, if that got exposed, a White nationalist leader being kind of shamed like that, the whole movement would have turned on him. They would have frowned on him, they would have basically made his position untenable. But what I saw was the opposite. Most people either just didn’t care or they rallied behind him and said:

“You know what? Everyone makes mistakes. Who cares? It’s not that bad. It wasn’t like you were race mixing or doing anything gay or whatever. Let the nigger live, you know, let him like he’s trying to do work for our people. Let him be human!”

And we’re seeing that more and more that the Right is becoming more sex-positive in that sense. And we’re becoming more and more impervious to sexual moralism, debilitating our side. And I think that’s a great thing!

Because there’s another huge story and Australian politics recently of Mark Latham. Mark Latham, you know, has recently basically been sticking it to the jews in New South Wales politics, calling out the jewish lobby, calling out how they’re pushing all of his Hate Speech laws, calling out the caravan hoax as a Mossad op. Speaking truth to power, holding the Premier of New South Wales and his staff, holding their feet to the fire for their complicity in, basically a Mossad hoax to take away our freedom. What happens? Immediately the media start attacking him because his ex-girlfriend was some OnlyFans slut, 30 years younger than him and he’s got all these embarrassing text messages where they have a BDSM relationship.

What did Mark Latham do? Just tripled down basically. And he just, he didn’t cuck! It’s been hilarious! He tripled down not just on the jews, [chuckling] but also on his like sex-positive attitude. Calling himself “the master” and so on in press conferences has been quite funny, and his tweets have been quite funny.

That is the energy that’s emerging now on the Right, where the Right are the ones that are having fun, the Right are the ones that are sexy. You know, many women have told me that they have gooned to NSN edits or NSN rally footage. I’ve seen these comments, I’ve seen the DMs. I don’t think anyone, I don’t think there’s women out there gooning to the Liberal Party videos. I don’t think there’s women out there getting to basically anyone in politics, any of their video hype edits except ours! We have a uniquely sexy kind of politics and I think we should embrace it.

So this is basically my introductory notion of the Goon Right. I think it’s something that needs to be debated, discussed because I think it’s very important that we harness and channel sexual energy to our ends, that we make racism sexy.

And if you think about it, racism and sex on a metaphysical level are basically the same thing. Both racism and sex are fundamentally means by which you perpetuate your own existence. They are the life force expressed through the psyche, through the body.

And so it kind of makes sense that like you know, a kind of post Christian life affirming Right would come to some kind of synthesis of a race based on and pro-sex, pro-masculine, pro-feminine concept. So I could see that as basically being the new paradigm that is kind of already here. It’s already been incepted.

But I think it needs a name and we need to meme it a little bit to make it conscious, because I think there’s still quite a few people that are maybe stuck in the old paradigm who need to be challenged and who need to be argued with and maybe they have some good points to make as well.

But yeah, I don’t think we want to be the incel Right. I don’t think we want to be the Trad Right where we’re just constantly morally policing ourselves and everybody else for having sexuality. I think that’s the complete wrong trajectory for us to take as a movement.

So anyway, I’ll put that to you guys. What do you think about that concept?

Blair Cottrell: You want to go first, Mark? I’ve got a few questions I want to ask Joel.

[56:10]

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ll go first. What you’re saying is. Sounds like Zoomer garbage.

At the end of the day, porn is a disgusting, vile poison foisted upon the Western world largely by jewish minds. They did this so that people lock themselves in the bedroom masturbating and don’t actually go out and meet real women. We need to smash all porn! It needs to be banned from the Internet. The purveyors of such need to be jailed or deported and all the filthy porn and madness OnlyFans, it needs to be shut down and genuine high level prosecutions for those who masterminded it all! It’s been nothing but destruction for young White men, has driven a wedge between men and women, prevented normal relationships from forming.

What we need to do is fundamentally get young men and young women back into traditional dating. Having sex, having White babies. That is what we need as a race. What we don’t need as a race is young White men sat consuming Internet filth, having their brains warped, getting sort of mild brain damage and then becoming gibbering, socially backward weirdos who can’t approach women. You get like that from watching too much porn, because porn has this effect on the brain which changes the way that you behave. There’s been numerous studies on this. I’ve made extensive videos on this.

And all of the things that have pushed this porn addiction, this addiction to masturbation, this addiction to increasingly depraved and degenerate acts, nearly all of them have been pushed by jews. So much so that when initial investigations into the porn industry in America took place, the people investigating the porn industry stated that it was nearly 100% jewish!

And in fact, jews who have written books and learnt essays on the porn industry boast that the porn industry was jewish. And it was motivated by an atavistic hatred of White Christian America that jews wish to dismantle because they wanted to break up healthy White society.

So I don’t really think, think that adopting sort of terminology and memes which are sort of associated with porn or glorifying porn in any manner is going to help us. And my message is clear, right? I’m a guy with a wife, two lovely White children. Don’t engage in any of this gooning or madness! Don’t go on OnlyFans! Don’t watch pornography! Go meet a woman, have babies. Do what you’re meant to do. Make sure your genetic line endures. That’s the biggest two fingers you can put up to the system.

Blair Cottrell: You immediately went to pornography, though, and I don’t remember Joel mentioning pornography specifically. What I’m understanding, Joel, is saying is that the Right, the Alt-Right, is becoming sexy and cool! It’s exciting, it’s interesting, it’s shocking to those who are attached to the system’s norms. And those people who are attached to the system’s norms, they’re the prudes now, Leftist system loyalists. They’re prudish! Feminists. They’re prudish! They’re the ones with all the rules. They’re uptight. Nothing’s allowed, that kind of stuff. Whereas the far-Right have a new rock and roll. Right?

So that was my understanding. And I’ve got a few questions to ask you, Joel, but before I do you have anything to say in response to that?

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, like, I didn’t really mention porn. I only mentioned in relation to the Arrval scandal. I don’t think we’re endorsing pornography here. But what we’re saying, though, is I don’t think we should be at the same time too morally harsh upon other people in the movement or our own people for being a little horny or going a little too far at times. You know, everyone’s human. We don’t live in a society where this kind of traditional, conservative sexual ideal is realistic or the way that people raised, or the kind of, we don’t have. Like, you don’t go outside and there’s a bunch of pristine virgins frolicking in sundresses in wheat fields that are ready to just marry you at the drop of a hat. That doesn’t exist, right? We live in a society where most people consume pornography. Most people have dating app accounts, most people have body counts. Most people do not have it all together in this domain.

[1:00:57]

And so if we try to hold up an ideal that’s completely unrealistic, and then morally police people and berate people for not embodying that ideal, I think we’re just going to come across as alienating to the vast majority of the population. Not that we should celebrate pornography or celebrate, you know, promiscuity, but at the same time, I think we could have a neutral attitude towards it where we stop trying to regulate, in particular, male sexuality. We stop trying to regulate sexuality as a political movement and instead try to channel it and use it to our ends.

You know, if there’s a girl who is going online with big titties and likes to get attention, but she’s also doing racist shit as well, if she’s also pushing our talking points or whatever, do we need to berate her for being a whore? Maybe it’s a good thing that all of the Gooners are basically having racism normalised through, like, watching her content or whatever.

So it’s like, at some point, I think we need to take a step back or, like should we be berating people for saying, Sydney Sweeney has a great rack? If a woman’s got a great rack, she’s got a great rack! I think we can just appreciate it for what it is. I don’t think we need to be the moral police here saying:

“No one is allowed to express any kind of sexuality. No one is allowed to have any kind of sexual history outside of monogamous marriage!”

And I think we could just live in reality, and I think we could embrace that reality, because, as I said now in the sexual marketplace, it isn’t this prudish, traditional morality which has any sway, has any power. It’s been basically defeated in our society.

What has power is feminism. What has power is women not wanting men to be able to have fun, not wanting women to do things to impress men, and not wanting men to be in control, to be dominant, to be assertive, to express any kind of virility. I think it’s far more pertinent that we position ourselves on the right side of this moral distinction rather than trying to morally grandstand about how horrible pornography is, I think, most people understand that pornography is bad. Like, consuming pornography all the time and jerking yourself off like crazy! The concept of gooning is a meme. Like, it’s not meant to be taken fully seriously. There’s an ironic component to it. We’re not saying, like, it’s based to, like log on to pornhub and just nut yourself crazy for hours and hours every night. But what we are saying is that maybe it’s not the worst thing if we’re on the side of sex against these, like prudish moralisers.

Mark Collett: I just want to address this. I’ve got to address this.

Firstly, we should be a movement of redemption. So if people have done crazy things and come to us and acknowledge what they’ve done’s crazy, we should accept them, allow them to put them behind them and move forward. But they shouldn’t be allowed to bring that filth into the movement.

Secondly, we should have high standards because we’re trying to be the best! We’re not just trying to be part of the goyslop madness that has destroyed our people. We’re trying to rise out of the swamp, rise out of the filth and present a better high ideal. It’s saying that because there’s high ideals, we shouldn’t have them.

Well, look at Blair. Blair’s an incredibly athletic man. Most men will never look like Blair. So does that mean we shouldn’t hold him up as an ideal of masculinity? Of course you do you hold up your best and you aim for that. But you know that a lot of people are going to fall short.

And finally, to say that we shouldn’t have shame, that we shouldn’t be shaming people, is absolute cucked nonsense! These whores who go on OnlyFans and sleep with a hundred, or a thousand different men in a day. Most of those men who are migrants, you see them queuing around the block, these people who just got off a small boat and they’re queuing up to have sex with a girl like Lily Phillips or Bonnie Blue. Those men are disgraceful scum! Those women are actually worse!

And if we had a proper society that shamed those women, they wouldn’t be doing it. But the sad thing is, when you normalise this, when you accept it, when you don’t shame it, young girls see those sluts as heroes and role models. I don’t want my daughter growing up in a world where OnlyFans whores, are seen as the role model, as the standard, as the ideal. I want my daughter growing up in a world where that kind of filth doesn’t exist and where those who would partake in it are shamed to such a degree that never show their face in society again. We’re not trying to take over the swamp! We’re trying to rise out of the swamp and create something better. And sure, many people are tainted by it and I am happy to take them by the hand, help them clean themselves off and help them towards a better future. But I don’t want them bringing any of the stinking, filthy disease swamp water with them when they come to us!

Blair Cottrell: I do think the point of life is often not to embrace your lower desires, but to try to rise above them. That’s how I’ve always tried to live personally.

But discussing this, as you called it, sexual transevaluation of Right-wing moralism. It’s an interesting topic. I think the old traditional Right-wing paradigm of sexual discipline was our paradigm for a reason. Right? And what about the traditionally Right-wing position that repression of the sex urge is a way of harnessing and focusing creative energy? Do you think that’s a thing or is that just a meme?

[1:06:32]

Joel Davis: Is that directed at me?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve got a few questions for you here and what I was asking you is like I’ve seen a lot of stuff from Right-wing influencers like Soul Bra, about, as I said, harnessing or repressing the sex urge in order to increase creative energy and channel that energy into something that’s more productive. Like do you think that sort of being more sex-positive or sexually liberated perhaps that could produce the opposite effects? It could be, as I said, a way of embracing your lower desire.

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, perhaps, but there’s also a point where you become over constrictive as well, where you over constrict yourself with morality to the point that it stifles creativity and it stifles like a movement. Like if we were to go around canceling, like for example, I agree with not canceling Aarvol because he did, you know, cringe pornography films 10 years ago. It’s not about, if he was doing it now, it’d be a different story. But 10 years, it’s like, who cares? Like at the end of the day I’m sure lots of people have done cringe things out there that hasn’t been exposed. But even let’s say that they haven’t, it is kind of out of the ordinary.

Okay, so what? Like he’s obviously sincere, he’s obviously trying to do the right thing now. So like, think we could forgive people? I think we could let go of this like hyper fixated moralism.

Of course we should have some sexual morality, but that sexual morality I think makes a lot more sense for the Right if it’s derived from a masculine dominant ideal where we have prohibitions against things like cuckoldry, prohibitions against homosexuality and so on. This is a affirmation of a kind of virile, normal sexuality as opposed to being anti-sex in general. I think a, like, Christian traditionalist morality, it almost views sex as like an evil, this like, perennial curse that we’re afflicted with in the human condition or something, and that it can’t be channeled or used for almost anything and it has to be basically sectioned off.

Blair Cottrell: Lust is evil, but I’m not sure if it views sex as evil because you said. Yeah, okay, but yeah, let me ask you this question. You said “racism is sex”, right? And I know what you’re getting at there because you’re talking about procreation and perpetuating your existence into the future through procreation, which is sex. But that’s a specific type of sex, right? That’s focused sex with a purpose. That’s not just loose sex, which is going to produce bastard children. That’s not lust after the flesh. That’s not just having fun.xRock and roll. Let’s just do whatever we want.

And so I think traditionally the Church was against that latter type of sex, whereas it would probably encourage the first type of sex because it would encourage people to get married, become loyal to each other, and then have a family where the children aren’t just going to be abandoned and mistreated, usually. What do you think about that?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think again, like, marriage is a good ideal, but in this day and age, like, what marriage used to mean was essentially proprietorship over the woman. Marriage meant that that woman was your property, basically, in a very traditional sense, like even in like, pre-Christian.

Blair Cottrell: Time, responsibility rather than property. I would say she’s your responsibility.

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. But at this point, like, you basically get zero rights! Like, you marry a woman, you have, like, literally no rights whatsoever as a result of that marital contract. All you have is a series of obligations and open yourself up to basically being legally raped.

So it’s like, why should men just accept, okay, I need to basically put pussy on a pedestal and treat a woman with like a body count of like six. Like, as if she’s like a peasant virgin from, like the Middle Ages. Like, as if those laws and social norms still exist when they don’t. We live in a completely different social and moral paradigm. And you could say that that’s tragic. Yeah, it’s not ideal. Like maybe it was better in the past, but this is the world that we live in. We don’t live in the 13th century.

So as a result of that, I think we have to adapt morally and politically and culturally to reality. And a movement that can accept reality and can channel that reality towards positive ends is one that will win.

Now, I’m not saying obviously I support having big families and I support people being loyal to each other and raising your family together and so on, but you know, the old kind of moral ideal can’t be just reinforced through morality. Like I don’t think that you can just go up to sluts and say:

“Hey, Jesus wants you to stop being a whore, you should pray more!”

And that they’ll magically pray away all of their carnal desires.

Mark Collett: Joel, you’re a good looking guy. Blair’s a good looking guy.

And I’m not going to start talking about my sort of sexual conquests. But I can tell you this. Now if you want a woman to stop acting like a slut and if you want a woman to toe the line and behave in a manner that is acceptable, the one thing she needs is a strong man who doesn’t take her crap. Most of these women behave like this because men simp for them. The real problem is these, …

[1:12:04]

Blair Cottrell: What does that look? What does that look like in practice, Mark? A strong man who won’t take a crap! Does it look like, does it look like a hand? Is that what it looks like? [chuckling]

Mark Collett: I’ll tell [chuckling] you what it looks like. I often say this is one of my well known sayings. If you’ve and people will understand this, that had a pet dog. If you’re playing with a pet dog on the beach, the faster you chase that dog and the harder you run after it, the further the dog will run, the quicker the dog will run and the more it will go away from you. The minute you turn your back on the dog and start walking towards the car, it’s licking your heels and begging for attention. Too many men spend their time simping for women, telling them what women here trying to be the “perfect gentleman”. When actually women respond much better to strength, power, masculinity and a guy that is not hanging on their every word and bigging up their ego.

And that’s why Donald Trump said what he said about grabbing women’s genitals, because he knew that as a strong man, if he walked up to them and grabbed them, they would just melt, because he was a powerful man who wasn’t going to take their crap. Where are these simply guys who are texting, … And you see these collections online of simpy guys sending a woman a hundred messages and she hasn’t replied once. She doesn’t want that! She doesn’t want that. What she wants is a guy who goes to the gym, who isn’t addicted to porn, who’s confident, who dresses well, who looks after himself. And when she says:

“How high you’re gonna jump? !”

He says:

“I’m not jumping for you, love. If you want to please me, but you show me how you’re gonna please me, you know, I’ll be there for you if you give something nice to me, but I’m not simping for you!”

That is what, …

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that.

Mark Collett: And that brings women into line.

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that what I’m saying is that for the sexual polarity to be properly instantiated, the terms have to be set from the masculine, not the feminine end.

So we shouldn’t be basically subordinating ourselves to this ideal of basically you’ve got to love and respect women so much, and viewing them as sexual objects or whatever is so so immoral and horrible. This is kind of like the feminist ideal.

The masculine ideal would have to be not putting pussy on a pedestal, putting your own direction in life first and foremost, and demanding that women submit and subject themselves to your career objectives, etc.

Blair Cottrell: Women will prefer it. Well, girls will prefer. Women will prefer. If you, as a man, do what Joel was just suggesting then. They find that more attractive than a man who is falling over himself to try to please and impress them. They’ll usually choose the guy who doesn’t have time for them because he’s too busy with ambitions, personal pursuits.

And that’s the thing. You go to the gym and you look after yourself. You do well in life not to impress women. You do it because you want to. And then women will be impressed by that naturally, you don’t do anything, …

Joel Davis: Women should be the ones trying to impress us! This is kind of, I believe, in a sexual phenomenology where, like, feminism in many ways is like the illusion of the feminine subject.

This idea that there’s this thing called the “feminine subject” that has all of these desires and inclinations that need to somehow be assuaged. But I don’t think it really exists in sexuality. I think the feminine properly understood in a kind of Platonic sense sexually is the object and the masculine is the subject.

And so people say, “happy wife, happy life”. I think this is bullshit! I think it’s actually the reverse. I think insofar as a woman is making her man happy, insofar as a woman is subjecting herself to a man and trying to seek his validation, ultimately that’s where her happiness will be derived from, because that is actually feminine! Feminine is submissive. The feminine is the second sex. The masculine is primary. The masculine is the active first principle.

And so as a result, when you see like what is Sydney Sweeney’s great crime against feminism and like wokeness and so on? Her great crime is that she presents herself in a way to impress men. She makes herself the object. And you could say:

“Well you shouldn’t be gooning over some random woman. You don’t know Sydney Sweeney.”

And I agree with it. But you can nevertheless appreciate that she is a woman that appreciates, presents herself in a feminine way. It’s a feminine object ideal as opposed to the kind of sexual morality that is generally preached by the establishment at this point, which is that the man has to check all these different boxes to keep a woman happy.

And so that’s kind of what I’m getting at with this like, Goon Right idea, like in exploring it is that that’s basically what this is about reversing the polarity, the kind of the feminine is expected to subject herself to the male gaze and is celebrated for doing. So and that is in contradistinction with the feminist pantsuit ideal, the girl boss ideal, which is basically the archetype of the HR bureaucrat or the modern contemporary politician.

[1:17:42]

Mark Collett: I’ve got one rebuttal to that. I’ve got a rebuttal to that. And my rebuttal is this. And it’ll be very quick so Blair can speak. We should also do more debates like this, Joel. People seem to like this kind of content. This is definitely going to get clipped out.

But look, feminists aren’t prudes. Feminists promote two or three archetypes of a woman. They do promote the girl boss. They do promote the fat, disgusting, stinking pig beast with loads of tattoos, pink hair and those disgusting ear stretchers. But they also promote slutty OnlyFans, debauched madness!

The one thing that the feminist doesn’t promote, there is a sector that the feminist doesn’t promote, and that’s traditional European beauty.

So the reason they were annoyed about Sydney Sweeney in the denim outfit is because she didn’t look like a fat, ugly cow beast. She didn’t look like a girl boss. And she wasn’t dressed in a scandalous manner. She didn’t look like a cheap prostitute. She actually looked quite traditionally beautiful. Like, if you look at European women from the Middle Ages, they used to wear big dresses, but they used to have their breasts pushed up with corsets. They used to have a curvy hourglass figure. They would show themselves off.

If you look at Greco-Roman architecture, the female figure was always shown off, but it was done so in a beautiful way. It wasn’t a ham beast. It wasn’t a debauched whore covered in tattoos and piercings and pink hair. And it wasn’t a bossy, cowy, snotty nosed bint that you wouldn’t want to spend five minutes with. There is one sector that feminists take, one section of sort of female society that feminists take, and that is traditional beauty.

And when I saw the Sydney Sweeney advert, I thought:

“Gosh, that looks like a beautiful woman from the 70s or 80s!”

And they hate that because she didn’t look like a slag. If you saw her walking down the street like that, you’d be like:

“Oh, she’s beautiful, she looks nice!”

You wouldn’t be:

“She’s a slapper, she’s mental, she’s a ham beast!”

You know, to a feminist, you can be anything, but the one thing you can’t be is traditionally beautiful.

And I think that’s where you’re missing the point.

And for me, if you said, should the Right-wing be sexy in that way, Damn, yeah, we should! If we’ve got a beautiful woman and she’s dressing like that, not like a whore, but dressing nicely, we will. Yeah, she’s beautiful. We should be presenting that. We should be presenting traditional, archetypical European beauty. Because that is the one thing that is the antithesis of the feminist!

Blair Cottrell: And the minority of amplified feminists who are so often in government positions these days, these are the only sorts of people who would get frustrated or angry by women like Sydney Sweeney looking beautiful. Because this minority of feminists, these government bureaucrats, these boss women, the dictators of the gynocracy, their whole existence is like a protest against traditional feminine beauty, because they don’t feel beautiful! They don’t want any women to be able to feel beautiful. They want to annihilate the standard concept of female beauty and replace it with something that is ugly. So they can feel like they’re normal.

When someone’s got a problem, when someone’s basically deranged, they become like the personification of disease, where they want to spread and make everything else as deranged as possible. So then they feel normal, they don’t feel so deranged anymore. That’s really the only kinds of people who would be upset about female beauty, like what is expressed through Sydney Sweeney. That which is expressed through Sydney Sweeney, I should say. But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you said that, …

Joel Davis: I want to jump in here quickly though. I want to jump in quickly on what he said. Yeah, because what he was basically saying like I’m not saying that we should celebrate women wearing like no clothes and like just tits and arse out. Like you go down to the shops these days, I’m sure it’s the same in Britain. And every single woman is wearing these, who’s like a young attractive woman is wearing these tight fitting yoga pants.

And it’s like you’re just bombarded with like asses in every direction. That’s like, how did this? It wasn’t like this when I was a kid. It’s out of control! I’m not saying that this is a good thing.

What I am saying is that it’s about the relationship between the masculine, the feminine. The male gaze. What you’re expressing is actually men actually like modesty. The reason why women are all dressing with their arse out like that is because they’re copying other women. It’s not even a masculine ideal. Men don’t like women wearing activewear everywhere all the time. I’ve never heard it, …

Blair Cottrell: Men do look at that. And so they’re, …

Joel Davis: Men do look at it. But like I never heard a man say like, damn, …

Blair Cottrell: Women wouldn’t dress that way if they didn’t feel like they were being rewarded with attention for it. Correct?

Joel Davis: You know what? A man would really get attention if she wore a fkh dress! If she dressed like a woman used to. If she wore like vd

Blair Cottrell: You’d get better quality of attention. Yeah, but as you said, women are copying other women because, …

Joel Davis: Women never wear dresses anymore because they have to signal to the other women that they also drink the same pumpkin spice lattes or matcha or whatever the fuck they’re drinking these days. And they also, …

Blair Cottrell: Let me ask you this, if you saw two women, …

Joel Davis: They’re conforming to the feminine gaze, actually.

[1:23:08]

Blair Cottrell: If you saw two women is a scenario for you? One was wearing the seemingly painted on mini gym shorts with no underwear underneath. And she was walking around like that. And then the other woman was wearing like a traditional dress which covered most of her body.

Which woman would you look at first and which one would you pay more attention to? For most men, they would look at the girl in the mini shorts. That’s the girl that wins over the girl in traditional dress. That’s why women dress in the mini shorts. And it wasn’t acceptable. We didn’t allow women to dress in the mini shorts back in the day. It’s only a recent phenomena that men have become, or society has conditioned men into becoming so weak and quiet that we won’t speak up and say anything about it.

And so that’s the problem, right? It just keeps, it just gets more and more out of control, doesn’t it? Women will keep pushing boundaries until they’re literally walking around in painted on clothes.

And I did say that, I think I said this on a stream like a year ago. I think the next stage of female fashion will be painted on crop tops. Like they’ll just actually start painting clothes on because like there’s not really a way they can start wearing less than they’re currently wearing without just literally airbrushing clothes on. That’ll be the next example of female fashion! It’ll start in the gyms probably, or maybe somewhere else.

But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you this because I think this will be handy for the young guys. The young guys should benefit from the answer to this question. You said that women like strength, right? But what is your definition of strength? What does strength look like in a man?

Mark Collett: Strength isn’t just physical, it’s a state of mind. And it means not bending. And without being rude about women, women have this mentality where they will push and push and push. And when a man breaks and gives them everything that they want, that isn’t actually what they want, which is the irony. What they want is a man who is going to be strong. That means standing up to them. It means holding a line, it means not eternally giving into them. And it means almost being like a stern father figure.

And I think part of this, if you look at way marriage used to take place, a father used to give away his daughter to her future husband, and it was almost as if the father was passing the daughter into the care of another man who would then take on that role of being the strength, the carerr, in many ways a disciplinarian. And that doesn’t mean you have to be harsh to women. It certainly doesn’t mean you have to beat them or hurt them. But what it does mean is that women have a more impulsive, more compassionate nature that can get them into trouble.

And the man is the counterfoil to that. The man is the one that provides the strength, the discipline, the ability to say no, which is very important. And when you take that strength away and you present a woman with a weak man, she’ll run roughshod over him, eventually chew him up, spit him out, leave him heartbroken and often damage herself in the process.

And a way, I’ll express this as a way that proves this in real life. You often get these very attractive sort of Hollywood feminists who give these long sort of TEDx talks about what a man should be and that he should be:

“Caring and kind and compassionate and help her with everything and listen and not be pushy and let her have the bed when she’s tired and he should sleep on the floor!”

And they never go out with that man! They never go out with him. They end up dating some, like Chad, 6 foot 7, rugby captain with muscles on his muscles, who obviously chucks around the bedroom, pins her down by the throat and makes her absolutely sort of melt every time he opens his mouth or lays his hand on her! Because no woman really wants that weak, pathetic, simping dork! They say they do, but they want the opposite. And that’s the conundrum of the woman. Women are hard to fathom, but fundamentally they want that guy who is going to be a blockade to their own worst instincts.

Blair Cottrell: You’ve got it figured out!

And if you haven’t tried this, you got a girlfriend, you got a wife, and you’re having problems with her. If you haven’t tried saying no, give it a go. Try:

“No, you’re not wearing that out. I’m not going out with you in that. Change your top, or no, you’re not going to that club tonight with your friends. You’re staying here with me. No!”

Try saying no and you might get some if she’s not used to it, you might get some pushback in the moment, but I guarantee you in most circumstances she will respect you more and come to like you more. She’ll become weak at the knees if you just create some boundaries and you don’t compromise on those boundaries. You don’t need to be mean or cruel like when you say no, it has to be coming from a place of care, a place of respect for her and yourself.

Because as you said, Mark, women do have a tendency to push. They want to push boundaries until they get away with what they never should have even been thinking about in the first place. Right. So we often exist to tell women no. That’s basically one of the primary roles of a man in any family relationship situation. We exist to say no, to create boundaries. Pretty simple stuff. Right.

[1:28:41]

Joel Davis: I’m just glad that Mark ended up completing his argument against the Goon Right with a really goonish rant, fantasizing about some 6 foot 7 rugby player just going to town. I think Mark is a gooner! I think he just too. He’s too Boomer. He’s too unk to realise the ironic connotation of the label. But that’s okay.

Yeah, it was good. It was a good discussion. I think it was kind of fun. That’s what I wanted it to be, fun. I wanted it.

Actually. It’s good that Mark came on. It’s a shame [Thomas] Sewell isn’t on because I think Sewell probably would have had hilarious reactions to this as well. But we can keep discussing this subject. The Goon Right is going nowhere. The Goon Right is coming back in a big way or it’s emerging in a big way. I see the trends going in that direction, and yeah, …

But again, I got to mention this again. White Australia.org if you’re in Australia, you want to come to our conference this weekend. It’s going to be spectacular! Sign up as a supporter and then you can get vetted and you can come to the conference Saturday and Sunday, this weekend. If you’re in Melbourne, come check it out. But you have to get vetted. We’re not just gonna let random people show up. We have to keep the event secured. So now’s your last chance to go through the process.

But yeah, I think basically. Yeah, I think basically we’re good for this portion of the show. We could get into like some Superchats or something.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s been a good show.

Mark Collett: Just to jump in here. I’ve got a show in America with Jared Taylor that starts in about 15 minutes. So I’m gonna have to duck out then. But if we’ve done most of the discussions, if there are any Superchats for me, I’d happily answer them first so people don’t feel short-changed.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll have a look. So Dingo Nationalist. This is addressed to you, Mark. He said:

“Mark. Have you heard any indication from any experts or lawyers whether you’ll have a reasonable chance of overturning your 15 year ban from Europe?”

Mark Collett: Yeah, I have. I’ve heard from a lawyer in Sweden who is attached to the nationalist cause. That is the one that’s going to be putting in my appeal. He’s got all my statement of fact now. I’ll be chasing that up later because I want to get it in well before the 21 day deadline. He thinks we’ve got a very good case because my statement of fact is extremely strong. You know, having there is precedent for me going to Europe, there is no precedent for me ever causing disorder and I have no criminal record. So there is no legal basis to ban me. This was a political decision.

However, despite the being a strong legal case, this isn’t the sort of thing that’s heard in court. This is the kind of thing that is heard by a secret panel of political overseers in some office in the European Union, which gives me a lesser chance of success. I’m sure if it went before a proper court, people would be outraged! I’m sure if you told the average Swede:

“Look, we basically let in every non-White who washes up on our shores, roll out the red carpet for them and let you know, sexually assault our daughters. But this White guy who’s against all that and has got no criminal record, we’re not letting him in.”

I’m sure most people will be appalled, but unfortunately that isn’t how it works.

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough. Well, I guess let us know how it goes when you go through that process. I’m sure a lot of us would like to know. And you should let The Noticer news know as well because they could cover it because you’re probably not gonna get good coverage in the UK.

Mark Collett: Yeah, they’re great! They wrote an article on me. They’re really friendly. And obviously, look, I really support you guys and love you guys and if people watching now want to show me some support, the best way to do it is to sub me on Rumble. So you’re watching on Rumble. If you want to sub me on Rumble, I’ve got a Rumble channel myself. If you can all hop over there and give it a like, or a sub or whatever it is, that would be appreciated. It doesn’t cost you anything, but just subscribe. Joel’s got a few thousand more followers than me, so if some of them could pop over and sub me, that would be much appreciated.

Joel Davis: This will link to Mark’s Telegram in the description. You can follow Mark on Telegram if you don’t already.

Mark Collett: Yeah, follow me on Telegram but also jump over on Rumble. I’m trying to build my Rumble up. You can also follow me on Odysee and Gab as well.

Joel Davis: This question is also for you, Mark. It’s from Aussie Autist 88. He said:

“Hey, Mark, how much better is the Aussie flag than the British flag?”

Mark Collett: I don’t know. I think they’re both good flags.

I mean, I’m just checking the I mean, I suppose the Australia flag, you could probably say. You could either go one or two ways. You could either say:

“Look, the Australian flag is better because it’s the British flag plus like some little stars.”

So you could say like:

“Yeah, it builds upon the British flag.”

Or you could say:

“It’s less good because it kind of takes perfection and tries to improve on it and just add some stars.”

Blair Cottrell: Is that the most diplomatic answer to that question that could have possibly been!

Joel Davis: Just say the fucking Union Jack is better! You fucking pussy!

[1:33:41]

Blair Cottrell: What he really thinks, guys, this British supremacist, he thinks that the shitty Australian flag is just some crappy offshoot of its parent creator, the Union Jack, the original Union Jack, you know. Come on, mate, let’s just be honest!

Mark Collett: Well, [chuckling] I like to please, I like to please everyone. This is why it’s so shocking that I’m banned from Sweden!

Blair Cottrell: The British flag is like Judaism and the Australian flag is like Christianity. It’s like:

“Hey, we’re the parent religion. The only reason you exist is we’re, …”

Mark Collett: Definitely not like Judaism. And that’s the one thing [chuckling] we’ll never, …

Joel Davis: Blair, really opening up like cans of worms with this. We’re just gonna leave it now.

Blair Cottrell: We’re not doing a religious discussion.

Joel Davis: We’re not going to go there.

Blair Cottrell: We’re ruling that out right now.

Joel Davis: Not gonna go there!

Also, I just want to say hail to all my goon patriots who goon swarmed the Avi Yemeni vs John Roddick debate yesterday with debate Joel Davis in the live chats on X and on YouTube. The spam was crazy! There were points during the stream where there was literally no comment section other than people spamming debate Joel Davis to Avi Yemeni. It was quite funny.

Blair Cottrell: How did he respond to that? Did he still just ignore it?

Joel Davis: He ignored it. I saw Rookshan’s pajeet face like freaking out because he was obviously Manning the live chat while the stream was going on. And yeah, it was quite good. Avi still running from the debate. I’m hoping that we can eventually set it up. I think me versus Avi Yemeni. That debate will break the Internet. I think that that will go insane! That’ll be probably the biggest Australian political debate in years. It will go viral. It’ll get nasty. It needs a moderator because Avi can’t shut the fuck up because he’s just yaps his little yid mouth! In that debate yesterday against John Ruddick, who didn’t do that well, by the way, but John Ruddick couldn’t finish a point without Avi just cutting in with more bullshit!

Blair Cottrell: I’d love to moderate an Avi Yemeni debate with someone.

Joel Davis: I don’t think he would agree to you moderating it, but we could find maybe someone more neutral.

Mark Collett: He’ll never debate you, mate. Tommy won’t debate me. These people are fundamentally cowards! They know that what we say is right. So like with Tommy, I’ve repeatedly said he’s actually threatened to fight me all sorts. And like, he might beat me in a fight, he might be able to knock me out, he might be able to hurt me, but one thing he will never do is sit and talk with me. He does not fear anything where I can’t open my mouth.

He fears me opening my mouth in front of his fans, because he is an absolute multiculturalist. He’s pro-immigration and he supports the genocidal system state of Israel, which is flooding Europe with millions of Arabs. And he doesn’t want anyone to tell his fans that, because he is a foreign agent and he fears the Collett.

And I’m sure that Avi Yemini fears the Davis just as much as Robinson fears the Collett. You know, they can’t be held up to truth. And if Robinson agreed to debate me or Avi Yemini agreed to debate you, Ezra Levant would be in his DMs in seconds literally being like, …

Blair Cottrell: Don’t do it!

Mark Collett: Shut it down! Shut it!

Joel Davis: Stop black pilling, Mark. Stop black-pilling. He’s gonna debate me. It’s gonna happen.

Mark Collett: I’m making you look good. I’m making you look good. I’m saying you’re so above his level. It’d be like Neo in the Matrix fighting those agents. You’d just be sort of chopping them down without even thinking.

And that’s why they fear you. They know you cannot be defeated in a debate by him. In the same way that Tommy knows, you know, he would not have a hope in hell. It’d be like 10 minutes in and it would be an absolute drubbing. You know, you versus Yemeni, you’re like Tyson in his prime and he’s like a blubbing, you know, scrawny, six former. You’d knock him out!

Blair Cottrell: In such a way where if Avi could be made to believe or understand that he will come away from the interview or the debate, and regardless of how it goes, he’s going to appeal to all of those Israel fanatics. They’re all still going to love him. And it’s going to be very entertaining. You know, it could be good for his image, it could be good for his platform, something like that’s the way you’d have to spin it because that’s the only way he would actually go for it. I think there’s a very small chance, though. I don’t think he would do it.

Joel Davis: Someone else can spin it. Get to work. Spinners spin this. Someone sell it to Avi. I know I have friends who have his ear.

Blair Cottrell: You got to say things like:

“Avi, you’re the only one who’s like, smart enough. You’re the only one who has the passion to actually stand up to this Nazi. This is your moment. You know what I mean? We need you!”

That kind of stuff. Like, you gotta really build him up.

Joel Davis: It’s gonna get done. He’s not going to do it right now, but it’s going to get done. We are going to debate. It is inevitable. It’ll be an incredible, like an incredible display of kike rape! And I’m looking forward to it. It is inevitable. It will happen. Everyone must will it into existence. If we focus enough will psychically on it as an outcome and goon swarm his channel, his chat enough elevate the meme to a higher and higher status. Eventually he will capitulate. White Bitch triple six said:

“Hi, gentlemen. Just wanted to wish my buddy Neddie good luck at nationals. I wish I could be there in the flesh.”

Presume that he’s going to be in the White powerlifting event. Modern World Reject said:

“Hail sex and deport stinky!”

That’s kind of a strange Superchat, that one. He Man 1488 just Superchatted his own name. He then Superchatted again, saying:

“I’ve got Tom Sewell’s credit card, so I’m going to town. Blair, give us a bicep flex.”

[1:39:21]

Blair Cottrell: How am I going to do that. I’m wearing a long sleeve shirt. Should I do it? I don’t know.

Joel Davis: You got to get it done!

Blair Cottrell: The man paid $10.

Joel Davis: All right, a little more. $10. Hey, there we go!

Blair Cottrell: Thanks. That’s the best I can do, guys.

Joel Davis: Yeah, that was a pretty cringe Superchat.

But yeah, also people are saying, debate Chalky. He called me out for a debate. I didn’t even know who he was. I agreed to it. I responded to his email. He said he was going to line it up. And that’s it. That’s the last I heard about it.

So I don’t know what’s going on. I guess we’ll find out soon. Is he flaking? Is he delaying? Hopefully delaying. But I was looking forward to that because it’s just very hard to get people to engage me at all because they’re afraid of what might happen. But I’m not a mean guy. I just want to have a conversation. I want to just debate ideas. I don’t know this guy from a bar of soap. I got nothing personal against him.

So, yeah, Chalky, just. Let’s line it up. I think he wants to do it on Joel Jamal’s show or something. Let’s line it up. Got some Entropy Superchats from Annabel Anna Bola Cost, who said:

“Hey, Joel, what’s the estimated timeline in regards to the White Australia party? Keep up the good work.”

Well, the estimated timeline is summertime launch, vaguely, estimated, but nothing’s in stone. Sign up White Australia.org help us get there, but we’re looking good! The numbers are, I don’t think are going to be an issue, but we need to go past the minimum number. You know, you need 1500 signatures to register a political party in Australia. But if we have only 1500 there’s games they could play to try and knock some of those signatures out. So what we need is to get well past that number so we give ourselves some breathing room. So we need as many signups as possible. We need as many members as possible.

So White Australia.org sign up! Help us out. Chevy Morgan said:

“G’day, Joel. I would like to debate you. I would be considered far-Right, however, believe Christian methods are more practical in nationalism. I’m an ex-Lefty as well. I have a small channel on TikTok with 1700 followers with based content. Chevy the Human.”

Well, I don’t go on TikTok.

So you’re gonna have to find a way to talk to me on a different platform because I’m not going to be able to talk to you on TikTok.

What else have we got here? It’s just like people not actually saying anything, just sending money, which I do appreciate.

Blair Cottrell: We just got a $1 Superchat back on Rumble from He Man as well, but I don’t think that’s up to you.

Joel Davis: Give us a flex. Well, I got a jacket on so like what am I gonna have to take my jacket off? Take it off. Gonna have to mog out here right now. Wait, here we go. I’ll give. I’ll give you this on. There we go.

Blair Cottrell: Very nice. That’s one.

And while you were doing that, Mike and Nolzy sent through a 10 Superchat. Thanks very much, mate. He said:

“Good to see you again. Mark, Nolzy from the Racer crew.”

Mark Collett: Thank you. Oh, no!

Blair Cottrell: The next Superchat is:

“Give us a flex, Mark!”

Mark’s gonna do it now. That’s good. That’s impressive. Hey, I like that. He’s got some. He’s got some peak.

Joel Davis: Well, he’s got like whole technique out here.

Mark Collett: Not bad for an old man. Somebody in the chat kept calling me Unk. Not bad for an old man, hey chat?

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the thing. My cope on biceps is I never work out biceps pretty much at all because if you get your biceps too big it actually really impairs your striking.

Blair Cottrell: So here’s the intellectual explanation and slash cope for why Joel had the smaller biceps, at least in this tonight.

Joel Davis: I also do not inject anabolic steroids and as well. But yeah. Ingo nationalist said:

“Joel, do you believe morality is objective or subjective?”

What kind of, I mean this is such a silly question.

Blair Cottrell: Subjective, isn’t it?

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. Different aspects of it are objective, different aspects of subjective.

Michael Goldberg 123 said:

“Debate Paul Golding.”

Blair Cottrell: Paul Golding? Do you have much of a relationship with him?

[1:44:11]

Mark Collett: Well, I get on with Paul so there’s not really much to debate, and Paul has more or less taken on every position that I have pushed. They’re now for deportations, for re-migration, they don’t allow Israel flags at their demonstrations, they’ve banned them! So I mean I’ve got quite a bit of synergy. It’d be more of a conversation. I mean Britain First as a group have pretty much adopted most of the stuff that we talk about.

I mean at one time I’d say he’d have had more synergy with Tommy Robinson but now he has more synergy with the ethno-nationalist Right because they’re doing marches for re-migration and as I said, they aren’t shilling for Israel. In fact they’ve banned Israeli flags at demonstrations which is what we want to see. There’s nothing worse than going to a nationalist demo and seeing a load of bloody Israeli flags. I mean that is the sign of a controlled opposition event.

Joel Davis: Well it’s good to see the Overton Window shift. And you know what we’re noticing in Australia as well is that the Israel shilling is taking a nose dive on the Australian right.

Obviously the controlled major parties, One Nation, Liberal, National, they still shill for Israel like crazy! But outside of that everyone’s turning on Israel, everyone’s turning on the jewish lobby in Australia very quickly and that was something that was unheard of basically only a couple years ago really.

So it’s great to see, great development to see, you know, an anti-zionist Right, a patriot anti-zionist position where you know my position, as I’ve said many times before, I’m not pro-Palestine but I’m anti-Israel. Like I’m not anti-Palestine, I’m just neutral on Palestine, but I’m anti, I’m anti-Israel. Palestine doesn’t do anything to me, Israel does! Israel completely has completely obliterated free speech in our country with literal massage psyops and the coordination of the diaspora lobby to attack our freedom of speech and try to put people like me in jail.

So why the fuck, why the fuck would I not be anti-Israel?

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty concerning how much influence they have in Australia though, despite Israel not being very popular amongst the masses. Like the influence the jewish lobby clearly has over politics, police. It is still very concerning.

Joel Davis: It is, it is! But what we’re seeing is the beginning of a patriot anti-zionist Right.

And obviously the Left, the Left aren’t huge fans of Israel. Even though the centre Left parties can still be captured by Israel linked Zionist linked power networks to control their policies somewhat.

But you know Israel has never been this unpopular, and it’s only becoming increasingly less and less popular, and particularly with young people as well young people from on the Left and the Right, for different reasons, agree on basically only one thing which is the “Fuck Israel” position. So it’s a beautiful thing.

Sean McKenzie said:

“All my moggers Nazis!”

And he also said:

“Debate Avi stop being a pussy!”

I’m trying to debate Avi! He’s the one being a pussy.

Blair Cottrell: I think there’s this in-joke in the chat where everyone’s pretending like you’re scared of him. That’s been going on for a while.

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. That’s kind of funny, I guess. Oh, yeah, He Man 1488 said:

“White pride world-wide. In the end, we win.”

Just want to point out that he man 1488 keeps sending $1 Superchats, the minimum Superchat and just spamming Superchats. This is what I like to call a cheap cunt! You know, he wants to have a lot to say, but he doesn’t want to pay too much for it. Gonna shame him for that. Pay up bitch! You know, we’ll still read them out, but like have some honour, have some pride, send me some fucking cash.

But anyway, that’s the end of the show. I think we. I think Mark has to go. Blair and I, we’ve got a lot to do. Big weekend coming up. We gotta compete in the White powerlifting competition and we got to give speeches. We got people coming from all around Australia that we’re hosting down here in Melbourne. It’s going to be a huge festival of racism this weekend. And yeah, should be quite interesting to see how it plays out.

Blair Cottrell: But thanks for joining us, guys and thanks, Mark. Thanks for your time. We just had one more Superchat from White Bitch triple six who says:

“Here’s some more sugar for the lads.”

Well, thanks very much.

Joel Davis: That goes pretty hard. Oh, Hail Yay also said:

“Drew Pavlou said he’s worried about debating you again because his family got doxed last time. He said he would be down to do it if he had a no dox guarantee.”

I didn’t dox his fucking family. I don’t know why he keeps pushing this line, but yeah, of course I’m not going to dox your family, Drew. I don’t have any interest in doxing your family. I do have an interest, however, in streaming with you. Even it could be a debate or it could be a friendly stream, because I just like the guy, but whatever he’s down for, I’m down for. I’m a slut for Drew Pavlou content.

But that’s basically the end of the show. Thanks, Mark, for coming on.

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! I’m gonna dash now, guys. Can I jump on this other show? But thank you for your time. It’s always been a pleasure. Enjoyed the debate, enjoyed the banter, enjoy the flex and look forward to working with you guys again soon. I really am looking forward to White Australia becoming a party and seeing how you do. So good luck with your future in endeavours and no doubt we’ll all stream again soon. Thank you so much!

Joel Davis: Yeah. Thanks, mate. White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour!

[1:49:53]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/7/2025 = 28)

ThigASteach
Supporter
10 hours ago
595 watching and 70 likes!! Come on folks. These good lads could use some more support. Tis little enough to hit a thumbs up! #PeaceAndRespect #GodBless
8 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
8 hours ago
That’s insane that he can’t even go on holiday in Europe anymore, life-wrecking stuff.
5 likes

Report
PaleDissident
9 hours ago
great stream
4 likes

Report
Ruminoid
10 hours ago
Women (or men for that matter) havent conspired to be where we’re at. When are you going to speak about corrupt Jewish satanic influence and influencers of music and Hollywood.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
You crypto jews never stop talking about yourselves. I wish you guys would stfu about your religion and your preferred boogeyman. ”da world would be a utopia if there were no jooos” derp.. fucktards.. stupid fucks.. halfwits..
0 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
when do we get the Jew fatigue? Never? I don’t know about your little shitholes but America has over hundred million nonwhites that people stop talking about because they are too busy talking about the Jews over everything else. They say black fatigue is when you get tired of mentioning black people. Well why the fuck haven’t people grown tired of Israel, the Jews, and Satan? Some bullshit.
0 likes

Report
EinZweiDrei
4 hours ago
Joel was a bit off base on the sexual energy thing imo. Our “vitality” should come from being physically fit and having Christian ethics.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EinZweiDrei
3 hours ago
Sorry to Joel if I’m interpreting him incorrectly. Great stream btw.
0 likes

Report
JQRC
Supporter+
9 hours ago
This was the wrong stream to debut the Gooner Right. This is a serious matter but should have made the point we are the youthful cool movement. Mark basically is the moralizing stuffy nice guy that says we dont have fun over here. Good luck with your Boomers, cause the Gooners are taking over!
2 likes

Report
ReclaimMan
5 hours ago
Mark’s ex-gf is a cutie, glad I got to see that
2 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
3 hours ago
Take a holiday in St. Petersburg. The Venice of Russia.
2 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
5 hours ago
Sounds like Joel is just rationalizing his own private escapades.
1 like

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
4 hours ago
the world is run by criminally insane megalomaniac perverts…something’s going to give eventually…
1 like

Report
Stopwhitegenocide1488
2 hours ago
Joel looks like a hasidic Jew with that hairstyle.
1 like

Report
Restlessdreams88
44 minutes ago
rap music is fucking gay
1 like

Report
katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – Another Week of Political Drama – Jul 27, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/08/03/joel-davis-another-week-of-political-drama-jul-27-2025-transcript/ In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the political drama concerning Blair and Tom and the alleged Nazi salute; and other topics.
0 likes

Delete
Neqis
7 hours ago
Such a short episode :((
0 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
6 hours ago
Keith Woods is definitely on the powder
0 likes

Report
PureWhitey
5 hours ago
Mark must have been gaming on his phone when Joel was making his point because he missed it completely.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
The “Lookmaxer” guy Nick spoke to recently was incredibly feminine, basically a f6ggot.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
Wait, we’re now pro-watching Jew porn and wasting our lives in the process? What’s going on? :S
0 likes

Report
david43
2 hours ago
these stories almost sound unbelievable if I haven’t been following these situations.. are there no good police officers that can speak up, in America there not supposed to follow unconstitutional orders but even here there are barely any good men… Such a crazy story if this guy is telling the truth….
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 hour ago
Why would you use the word goon if you weren’t referring to porn?
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
1 hour ago
Joel has a point in the sense that sexuality is good but I would say that sexuality must be divided into Eugenic Sexuality vs Dysgenic Sexuality. The Monkish asexual mindset is dysgenic.
0 likes

Report
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
Would it be accurate to say that women these days sometimes need a light spanking on the bum…
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
…never in anger of course.
0 likes

Report
GustavusVasa
Supporter+
1 hour ago
Gooniest episode ever Mark was on tonight
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
10 hours ago
assuaged is pronounced uh-swayjd, not uh-sawjd
-2 likes

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 19883

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4: Mon, Aug 11, 2025 — Table of Contents (up to 20 entries).

Version 3: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 — Table of Contents (up to 10 entries) started.

Version 2: Fri, Aug 8, 2025 — Transcript now completed = 110/110 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5.

Version 1: Thu, Aug 7, 2025 — Published post. Transcript completed = 32/110 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Rumble comments (28).

Mark Collett – Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024 – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

admin — Sun, 03 Nov 2024 08:59:44 +0000

Mark Collett

Facing the Storm

PA Conference Speech 2024

Sat, Oct 19, 2024

[In this video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, gives an impassioned speech at PA’s annual conference about the challenges and dangers ahead for nationalists in a regime that is increasingly open about its White replacement agenda.

The following points were made by Mark:

Opening remarks thanking attendees.

Analogy of boiling a frog to describe gradual societal changes.
“Since 1945, there have been sweeping changes to almost every aspect of British life.”

Recent rapid changes under new Labour government.
“The heat has been turned up so quickly that nearly everyone is talking about it now.”

Public perception shift on immigration issues (8:00)
“There was once a time when you could speak to members of the public and they didn’t believe mass immigration was even an issue.”

Recent events highlighting immigration concerns (10:00)
“Who would have thought back in June that less than four months later we would have seen the murder of three little White girls by the son of migrants?”

New government policies and crackdowns (12:00)
“New legislation is now being drafted to criminalize those who speak out against migration.”

Two-tier system disadvantaging white British citizens (15:00)
“Normal White working folk are now clearly second class citizens.”

Mainstream acknowledgment of two-tier policing (18:00)
“The term has been used in Parliament, in the media and in almost every major newspaper.”

Opportunities and dangers of current situation (20:00)
“This is a watershed moment for nationalists here in the UK and it represents not some small or incremental shift, but a massive jump.”

Government’s acceleration of immigration (23:00)
“The establishment have clearly acknowledged that there is a race going on between migration and the public consciousness of migration.”

Recent population statistics (26:00)
“For the first time since 1976, deaths outstripped births here in the UK.”

Government’s efforts to silence dissent (28:00)
“Their second course of action is to effectively terrorize white people”

Origins of the term “terrorism” (30:00)
“The words terrorism and terrorist came into existence thanks to a gruesome and protracted period of state sponsored violence during the French revolution.”

Current state surveillance and oppression (33:00)
“We are moving toward a point where holding the wrong opinions will be seen as almost a capital crime”

Changing attitudes towards remigration (35:00)
“Remigration is now rightly seen as the only solution that can save us from becoming a minority.”

Potential criminalization of remigration rhetoric (37:00)
“Calls for remigration and deportation could well be outlawed as terms that are likely to stir up racial hatred.”

Plans for indigenous rights advocacy (39:00)
“We will become an indigenous rights advocacy and pressure group.”

Expectation of some supporters leaving the movement (41:00)
“I expect that some people who were once very active in this movement will take their leave.”

Speaker’s commitment despite risks (42:00)
“I will carry on despite the associated risks, because I believe more than anything that what we do is right.”

Closing rallying cry
“Those who dare to fight in the darkest of times are the heroes that will ensure that tomorrow belongs to us.”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/PA-Conference-Speech-2024:2?src=embed

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aWGeQ4dQjuCr

https://gab.com/MarkCollett

https://t.me/s/markacollett

Published on Sat, Oct 19, 2024

Description

Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024
November 1, 2024
1,344 views
161
Support
Save
3 Reposts
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
15K followers
Join
Following
My speech from the 2024 Patriotic Alternative Conference.
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrs
JUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
FREE eBook download:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/downloads/TheFallofWesternMan.pdf
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
File size
1.62 GB
Less
2.47
19 comments

_____________

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Don’t be just a consumer, contribute to the cause, however small. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 4,629 – Duration: 45 mins)

Aaron Spreadbury: All right, so our final speaker today needs no introduction, but he’s going to get one anyway! He has been in nationalism for over 20 years, and there isn’t much that he hasn’t seen. He is the founder and the leader of the largest nationalist organisation in the United Kingdom, and he has led Patriotic Alternative with both wisdom and courage. And without his efforts, none of us would be here today.

So please put your hands together and give a hearty round of applause for the one and only Mark Collett!

[loud applause]

Mark Collett: Firstly, before I start speaking, I just want to say a huge thank you to everyone who came here today. To see us packing out a room like this for what, the fifth year in a row is incredible! The momentum we’ve built and the momentum we’ve maintained over the last five years, people often credit to me. But it’s not really me who did this, it’s us!

So when people are giving myself a round of applause, I do appreciate that. But the round of applause should be extended to everyone who is part of our community, because first and foremost, that is what Patriotic Alternative is all about.

Now, there is an overused analogy that I am sure everyone in this room will be familiar with. And that analogy is about boiling a frog.

But in case you are the one person in the room that hasn’t heard of this analogy before, it’s based around the idea that if you were going to boil a frog, which I don’t recommend, by the way, but if you were, and you were going to boil that frog alive in a pan of water, you’re better off putting the frog in cold water, placing the pan on the stove and gently turning up the heat so the frog doesn’t know that it’s being boiled alive, until it’s too late. The converse of this is, of course, you just throw the frog into a pan of bubbling water on the stove and it jumps right out and it escapes!

Now, obviously, everyone in this room today can understand why this analogy has been used so often, as it clearly applies directly to the struggle that we are in. Since 1945, there have been sweeping changes to almost every aspect of British life. And if you took a snapshot of Britain in, let’s say, 1950, and compared it to the Britain that we live in today, I think we’d all agree [sound cut out] … Fresh water from a stream with bubbling hot water sat in a pan on a stove. And we didn’t go from 1945 to 2024 in a heartbeat or even in a short period of time. It took us over three quarters of a century. That’s longer than the average lifespan of the people who were alive when all of those changes were set in motion. The changes were drip fed to the public.

And in terms of the analogy that I began with, the analogy of the frog in the pan, the heat was turned up so very slowly over such a lengthy period of time. But here today in Britain in 2024, I finally think that the overused analogy of the frog being boiled is starting to lose its relevance. As since the election of Keir Starmer and the current Labour government, the heat has been turned up so quickly that I think it would be impossible for anyone not to notice! In fact, the heat has been turned up so quickly that nearly everyone is talking about it now.

Now, as people have said, I’ve been around for a long time and it was once common for nationalists like myself who engaged with the public to be turned away or dismissed on the grounds that we were talking nonsense! I’ve spent over two decades trying to convince the public of both the reality and the gravity of the situation that we as a race and nation face. I have first hand knowledge of the way the public dismissed us.

Believe it or not, there was once a time when you could speak to members of the public and they didn’t believe mass immigration was even an issue. And they certainly would not have entertained the idea that White Britons would ever have faced the prospect of being a minority in their ancestral homeland.

What’s more, if you tried to inform people that as this process would take place, not only would White Britons be the ones to pay financially for the transition, but during that transition they would become an underclass, many people used to roll their eyes. They would even laugh and mock you for what you were saying.

To many, the future that we warned of was simply preposterous! It was a fantasy! Or worse still, it was a conspiracy theory! And I’ve had that argument thrown into my face more times than I care to remember.

But over the last three and a half months, things have changed dramatically. There has been a massive, a seismic political shift in Britain. A shift that has been overseen and stage managed by what is undoubtedly the most nakedly anti-White and pro-migrant government this country has ever seen! One that puts both the Blair and Sunak regimes to shame. This shift is the equivalent of turning up the heat under the pan, not by several degrees, but by such a factor that the frog immediately takes note.

Who would have thought back in June that less than four months later we would have seen the murder of three little White girls by the son of migrants? Spontaneous mass anti-migrant protests on the streets of cities the length and breadth of the country. A brutal police clampdown like nothing we have ever witnessed before. 24 hour politicised courts being convened to deal with speech and thought criminals! The Prime Minister going on television to tell us he is forming special police forces to simply focus on Internet hate crimes. New legislation is now being draughted to criminalise those who speak out against migration.

[09:38]

But on top of all of that, there is a raft of new economic cash grabs, including a discriminatory policy that withdraws vital winter fuel payments from over 10 million, overwhelmingly White, pensioners in order to ensure that a raft of diverse and progressive policies can still be funded. But whilst all this is happening, whilst Labour is stripping us of our rights and signing off on what could effectively be a policy that leads to a cull of elderly White Britons, they have also been preparing an amnesty for over 100,000 illegal immigrants, as well as removing the final few remaining blockades to migrants entering the country.

And all these new Britons that are going to be granted the right to stay here, they won’t be facing the same financial crisis that us true Brits will! As Labour is committed to spending millions, if not billions, on making sure these people are cared for in every way imaginable! I have to emphasise this again, this is all within four months of Starmer being elected. They have not just turned up the temperature a little, they have gone straight to gas Mark 10 in the blink of an eye.

And on top of that, they are not even trying to hide it! Now at one time governments, especially the Conservatives, always the Conservatives, would usually dangle a carrot in order to soften the blow. But the current Labour establishment are so totally shameless and anti-White that they don’t even do that! Things have changed so much so that I don’t think going up to people and talking about migration and the idea of Whites becoming a minority would be something that anyone contested anymore.

Now, sure, I think you would find liberals out there, and those liberals would say:

“Yeah, the demographic shift is happening.”

And they’d be celebrating it. But they’d still admit that it was happening. They would say:

“They celebrated it.”

Rather than denying it.

But more importantly than accepting the facts on migration, which are of course important, is the fact that people are now aware that we live under a two tier system. A two tier system is in place where the indigenous people of these islands are automatically placed at a disadvantage when compared to both new arrivals and those from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Now, granted, the rules are a little more complex than what I have just stated, obviously White Britons who are part of the ruling elite, Whites who are part of far-Left organisations, or Whites who are part of degenerate, sickening subcultures, will get a pass. But normal White working folk are now clearly Second Class citizens! And worse still, if you are White and if you’re speaking out against mass immigration, multiculturalism or talking about demographic change, you will be treated as the lowest of the low! And you will have fewer rights than any other group in the country!

Now this in itself is not news to anyone in this room. We’ve known this was coming for a long time. We know if a member of an anti-fascist organisation punches someone, the police don’t care. If a nationalist defends himself and it’s self defence, you’re getting arrested. If a young black male sets fire to the Union Jack at the Cenotaph, it’s a suspended sentence. If a young White male kicks a policeman because three little White girls were murdered, it’s off to jail for 26 months!

And again, this isn’t news to us. We’ve seen this creeping up. We’ve known this was coming for years and we’ve spent, some of us, decades trying to warn the public.

But in the last few months, the dam has finally broken, when it comes to talking about this issue. The issue of “two tier policing” has gone mainstream. The term has been used in Parliament, in the media and in almost every major newspaper. The heat has been turned up so quickly that not even the press can deny what is happening. And the public are no longer deriding or ignoring what we say. They are openly voicing our talking points, which are increasingly becoming part of the everyday discourse in workplaces, in social clubs, in pubs and in homes all over Britain. This is a watershed moment for nationalists here in the UK! And it represents not some small or incremental shift, but a massive jump! But that jumps before you all start celebrating presents both great opportunities, but also serious dangers.

Let’s start with the good stuff. Let’s start with the opportunities. Never before has immigration been such a hot topic. Never before have so many people been openly concerned about demographic change. This isn’t just reflected in the way normal people are speaking. We’ve seen a massive change in the way that formerly race blind politicians, content creators, and influencers are reporting on the issue of immigration and anti-White policymaking. All of a sudden there is a palpable fear about the prospect of the UK becoming a country where the indigenous population are a minority. And there is also this growing concern of how White people would be treated if they were a minority. Even Nigel Farage has finally spoken about the ethnic makeup of our cities and even made an election pledge about deporting people.

Finally, the world is accepting the talking points that we have pushed for generations. The truth is breaking through!

[17:55]

However, we should not rejoice too much, because there’s a lot of negatives to this as well. The obvious negative is the way that Keir Starmer and the Labour government are approaching this mass awakening. In short, they are set on two courses of action.

The first is that they wish to accelerate mass immigration into Britain. The establishment have clearly acknowledged that there is a race going on between migration and the public consciousness of migration. On one hand, migration is increasing, but on the other, the public are now more aware that migration is this big threat and that it affects their lives in so many ways.

The race taking place now will decide whether Whites will become a minority before they become racially conscious enough on a wide enough scale to prevent themselves from becoming a minority. And the establishment is not run by idiots. They know how crucial this race is! Starmer and his cabinet know that if White people were to wake up before they were outnumbered, the game is up! Migration is ending, it will be reversed and we will remain a majority.

On the other hand, conversely, they also know if they can increase migration and Whites slip under a certain percentage of the population, it’s effectively game over! White Britons at that point will be destined to minority status!

So the first course of action the Starmer government will be set upon is to speed up White replacement to levels that we have never seen before. And on top of all of that, they have something going in their favour. They already know that we are reaching that tipping point, that the point of no return is not very far off at this juncture. With hundreds of thousands of White Britons leaving the country every year to run from this nightmare, with millions of migrants coming in with birth rates being overwhelmingly in favour of migrant communities, they will surely at this point, think that victory is in their grasp.

And if you want a bit of perspective on this isn’t just me saying this, I’m going to give you the latest figures. It was either this week or last week a report was published. Over the last 12 months. For the first time since 1976, deaths outstripped births here in the UK. Now, you don’t have to be a genius to work out that should lead to a falling population. Yes? But over the same 12 months, our population grew by the fastest rate it ever has in history! We cannot hide from the fact that we are now being replaced faster than we ever have before.

Now, you think that’s bad, but their second, and I said that was the first course of action. Their second course of action is actually worse than the first. And I know what you’re thinking, how on earth could something be worse than speeding up mass immigration to the point where we become a minority even faster? Well, it’s simple.

Their second course of action is to effectively terrorize White people so that even if Whites become racially conscious on a much larger scale, most of those who understand the truth will be too scared, too browbeaten, to ever speak out about the issue! Effectively meaning that the racially conscious White Britons will sit in silence rather than stand up and join our chorus of dissent.

Now, the astute amongst you will have noticed I used a term there. I said “terrorize”. And I use that term for a specific reason. You see, whilst the government loves to use the word “terrorism” to describe those who espouse views that they don’t like, there is a bitter irony to them using that word in such a way. You see, the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” came into English use as translations of words used in France during the period known as “The Reign of Terror” that took place between 1793 and 1794.

And during that era, the newly installed French government punished, usually by death, those people who were thought to be against the ongoing revolution. Those words came into existence thanks to a gruesome and protracted period of state sponsored violence. It is quite amazing really. The words terrorism and terrorist were originally words used to describe brutal acts of oppression by the State directed against those who spoke out against the state. Or in many cases, those acts of brutal oppression were used against people who were merely perceived to be going against the state. And that is exactly what we’re seeing here now in Britain!

When you see mothers dragged out of their homes for social media posts, when you see working men sent to prison for shouting at police officers, and when you see hard working fathers jailed for minor offences like throwing a traffic cone towards police officers we are living in times of political oppression that can only be described as “state sponsored terror”! We are moving toward a point where holding the wrong opinions will be seen as almost a capital crime, where saying the wrong words to the wrong person will see you receive a sentence longer than what a sex offender would receive.

And this worrying shift towards a complete and total clampdown on freedom of speech and freedom of expression is exactly what I would have predicted from this Labour government. This clampdown has the potential to be the most comprehensive in history, because it is backed by a surveillance state that is unrivaled!

But just as worryingly, it will also be supported by the same disgusting, sniveling people who snitched on their neighbours during the Covid lockdowns. The kind of people who phoned the police when people on their street didn’t come out of their homes at the allotted time to clap like demented seals for the NHS.

Make no mistake, we are now presented with the greatest opportunity that nationalists have seen in a lifetime! But we are also presented with the most draconian laws, the most oppressive system, and a surveillance network that makes anything written in 1984 look like a joke!

[27:50]

But the talk of this takes me back to a different time, a time when I was a young man and how politics was when I first joined this struggle. When I first got involved, I joined the BNP. At the time, the BNP was trying to hide their re-migration policy. The party played down talk of sending people home. We never spoke of it, we never featured it in publicity material and we actually treated it as if it was our dirty little secret. It was something that we spoke of behind closed doors.

We called it the Repatriation Policy. And the party watered it down! Hid it on their website, and had a policy of never speaking about it, never putting it on leaflets, never talking about it at meetings, and definitely never, ever mentioning it in a media interview!

Today, however, several decades on “re-migration” is a buzzword. For the first time in my lifetime, re-migration is a rallying cry that is posted tens of thousands of times a day on social media. Deportation is demanded by sitting MPs. Normal people are discussing sending them back!

[applause]

Remigration for the first time in a generation is seen not just as a viable solution, but as a necessary solution! Remigration is not just the battle cry of nationalists, but something that normal people are now openly desiring. Remigration is now rightly seen as the only solution that can save us from becoming a minority. It is what we need in order to survive!

But before we celebrate and before we cheer, there is a flip side to that. Remigration is also a term that could soon become illegal. Calls for re-migration and deportation could well be outlawed as terms that are “likely to stir up racial hatred”. And I say “likely” because that is the new word that will be the new bar when deciding whether speech is hate speech. At one time, speech would have to be abusive, insulting or threatening.

But now the Labour government wished to change this to the lower threshold of merely “likely to stir up racial hatred”.

So on one hand, we see a golden opportunity, we see progress and we see the public increasingly accepting our talking points in larger and larger numbers. And most of all, we are finally seeing re-migration being discussed, normalised and even adopted in other Western nations.

But on the other hand, we have these draconian laws, a surveillance state, two tier justice and a clampdown on our freedoms that even George Orwell would never have predicted. Make no mistake my friends, this is a high stakes game. Everything is on the line! All the chips are on the table! And we stand to gain everything. But we also stand to personally forfeit everything if the state singles us out for persecution.

And I’m not going to stand here and lie to you. The risk is real. There are people now in jail cells serving multi-year sentences for saying the wrong thing, attending the wrong protest, or even publishing stickers that the Crown stated were completely legal.

So the question that people will ask me is:

“Where do we go from here?”

Well, we are going to do something that no other group has ever attempted to do here in the UK.

Firstly, we will remain as the community building group we have always been. At the centre of everything we do will remain this community, but we will become an indigenous rights advocacy and pressure group. The only group in the UK that will fight for the rights of the indigenous people of this country who face discrimination, abuse or even jail. We will use this community that we have built to be both a support network and a shield wall for those whom the system attacks.

And the thing that makes me the most proud is that we have already begun doing this. Since the recent anti-migrant protests, we as a community have already raised £15,000 for the families of those who have been jailed for either speech crimes, non-crimes, such as shouting at the police, or being present when disorder took place, and for people who were jailed for minor infractions.

[applause]

And this is a bold move, not just because no one else is doing it, but also because I believe it’s the one thing our people need the most. They need a community that stands behind them when the state comes knocking on their door!

But that sadly brings me to the most uncomfortable part of what I’m going to say today. With this clampdown, with this high stakes battle for our future, with tensions in the country reaching boiling point and with political persecution reaching levels that we have never seen before, I expect that some people who were once very active in this movement will take their leave. The idea of going to jail or becoming a social pariah will simply be too much for them. These people will look at political prisoners like Sam Melia, and whilst they will admire them and want to support them, they will be terrified of being in their shoes.

Some people will now decide certain things can’t be discussed. They will quietly fall in line with the government’s new mandates, and they will behave like trained dogs, understanding exactly what their masters expect of them.

But I’m sure there is a question here for me. What will I do? And I say I because I am speaking for me. And on this topic, I can’t speak for you. But I will carry on despite the associated risks, because I believe more than anything that what we do is right!

[standing applause]

And people have asked me this. When I say people, I mean members of the public, people in this room, my friends, even my family. They’ve said:

“Mark, is this worth going to jail for? Was this all worth losing your bank accounts? Was this all worth becoming a social pariah that can’t do many of the things that normal people do?”

And I look at them and smile and say:

“The answer is unequivocally yes!”

[applause]

[38:11]

You see, sometimes in life there are bigger things at stake than your own individual well being, your own financial security, and your own social status. From a young age, I acknowledged that the most important thing was the survival of people of European descent!

[applause]

I acknowledged that if we as a people cease to exist, anything that I achieve as an individual in my life would be irrelevant. And now I look at the current situation and I know the risks are greater than ever! I know the establishment will continue to tighten the noose around our necks, choking our freedoms.

But I have done this for long enough to know that the establishment’s actions do not come from a place of strength. Instead, they come from a place of fear and uncertainty. The establishment knows that the cracks in the Multicultural Project are growing by the day. And that’s why they are desperate to pass these new laws as they know the truth is breaking through. And their only hope now is not to hide the truth, because they can’t do that anymore! Their only hope now is to stop people speaking the truth that they already know! They aren’t jailing nationalists because they’re winning. They are jailing nationalists because they’re finally losing their grasp on power!

And that’s why, at this crucial juncture, despite the increased risks, I believe it is time to grit our teeth, to dig our heels in and fight harder:

“But what about our freedom?”

People will cry. Well, the answer to that is simple. Being free is about being able to live as you wish. Being able to say what you want, to be able to do what you please, and to associate with those whom you love. If you can’t do those things, if you choose to self censor, and if you give up on your beliefs, if you are forced to turn your back on your comrades and friends, one thing is for sure, you are not free. You are a prisoner in their system. But worse still, you are a prisoner by consent! And I for one, am not going to consent to being a prisoner of their system. I do not consent to spending my life on my knees for anyone. Especially not a system that despises me, my family, my friends and my people.

[applause]

My message today is clear. Despite the hardships, despite the increasing oppression, and despite what may seem like overwhelming odds, we will never be silenced!

But more so, we will give a voice to those who the system tries to silence. We will be the support network for the most oppressed, trampled people in this country, white people who dare to oppose their own replacement. We are engaged in this struggle because we understand one thing. The most precious thing in the whole world is our people! And the survival of our people is non-negotiable!

So despite the increasing tyranny that we face, we will never stop fighting. And even if our brave comrades are arrested and dragged away from their families and imprisoned, their heads will not be bowed, their flame will not dim, and they will not be forgotten. Quite the opposite in fact. Their heads will be held up high. Their names will be known by more people than they could ever have imagined. Their fight against this system will be spoken of not only the length and breadth of the country, but it will be spoken of all over the Western world.

Because those who dare to fight in the darkest of times are the heroes that will ensure that tomorrow belongs to us!

Thank you.

[44:10]

[long, stand up applause]

[44:35]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/3/2024 = 40)

@The_Real_Batman
1 day ago
I honestly think now, the political route is not where effort should be given.
The woodlander did make a good point on this subject. Creating a community of sorts is the most beneficial method.

13
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
I agree!

5
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
i agree

3
0
Open Borders for Israel
1 day ago
$5.00
Mark Collett is the bravest man in the UK

11
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
He has been very effective within the wiggle room you have.

2
0

@cheflad
1 day ago
Great Speech.

7
0
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Great speech, acknowledging the problem is the first step to solving it

6
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
The message is still being suppressed but I’m optimistic.

3
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I am optimistic as well all we need is a certain number of our people to wake up and wanting to do something about it and it is game over for them

2
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
community is everythig.

4
0

@Andy1967UK
1 day ago
Great speech
Play @ 1.25speed

2
0

@PureNomad
1 day ago
$14.88
So soon after listening to Ayatollah’s speech… its hard to listen without thinking of his Collett impersonation
Good speech mate, agree that we are no longer frogs being slow cooked, we are being roasted alive screaming.

4
0

@6079SmithW
1 day ago
God bless you Mr. Collett.

4
0
megazord
1 day ago
The All-time Anglo

4
0

@WhiteLightKnight
1 day ago
Superb speech. Difficult to see anything in this speech that wouldn’t chime with the vast majority people in this country.

2
0
Rusty-Hinge
1 day ago
Bravo Mark.
Excellent speech. I wholeheartedly agree with every point, especially regarding our own advocacy group.

2
0
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
Hey Mark, changing the hearts and minds of people is a gigantic task for sure.
When someone makes a stand we see the response from governments and lobbiests.
We always view the job ahead as one of alienation of immigrants and they are left out of any conversation, they are essentially bystanders watching their host country’s implode.
I think we should use these groups more effectively to wake the NPC’s up.
By use, I mean have conversations with them on their views
, what would they do if in our situation or if it happened in their country’s and what solutions would they take.
Actually what would they do to their government if such crimes happened in their lands.
The responses no doubt would be one’s that would shock the people sitting on the fence.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
I have to disagree with the boiling frog analogy for the US. All the signs were there but Americans, especially fluoride and lead poisoned boomers, just didn’t care. They still don’t care.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
Is Irish Nationalism compatible with British Nationalism? I’m neither just curious.

0
0
=============

BitChute Comments

Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024
639 Views – 2 days ago
Channel
Mark Collett
23.2K Subscribers
MarkCollett
Sensitivity – Normal (BBFC 12)
My speech from the 2024 Patriotic Alternative Conference. Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cm…
Show more

2 hours ago
JamesWood
Smashingly good speech, unbelievable that PA isn’t the number 1 most popular party in the UK right now.

14 hours ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Massive immigration. Industry is more concentrated than ever in fewer and fewer hands. Retail is disappearing. So where are they needed?
Edited 13 hours ago
1
0

9 hours ago
Pensive11
In demographic numbers. They’re here to replace us, and they’re doing a great job. Not long to go now.
1
0

2 hours ago
JamesWoodPensive11
It’s nearly game over. It will be game over by 2050

19 hours ago
Intro Skipper
Duke & Slattery show was worth a listen.
https://media.blubrry.com/rbn/ins.blubrry.com/rbn/stream_2024-10-24_120000.mp3

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Payback for saving those poor jews and letting them write the Versailles treaty.
2
0

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Trump is the next Churchill. WW3 in 2025. Expect amnesty for illegals and more legal immigrants, and the worst draconian hate laws for speaking up, esp against jews, who everyone knows control money, credit and media. Rothschilds control the Sqare Mile City of London and the Bank of England and banks across the world.u
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
Trump is a chicken, both of them are. When crowds chanted to Hitler SIEG HEIL,Hail victory, Hitler said to them, change that word Sieg, to Kampf, Battle. Kampf Heil, hail the battle. Thats what is coming!
Edited a day ago
0
1

a day ago
totenkopfelite
Bravo and Hail Victory
1
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Mark, don’t ever call me a comrade.
0
3

2 days ago
50Quid
Oh yes, before I forget you will have BBBEE (Broad Based Black economic empowerment) If you are a white man “YOU WILL” have a non-white business partner who “WILL” own a 51% stake hold of your company so that in a few years once he has learned the in’s and out’s of your business he can turn around and legally fire you and there’s [show more]

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Don’t blink ’cause for all the black-empowerment bullshit, Asians/Indians/Chinese are real the benefactors. Where I work, they cry about “not doing enough for blacks” while the office is 80% Chinese/Indian. Blacks will be prominent in media/movies/Hollywood, but I don’t expect them to be in the boardrooms across the country.
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
That same story about blacks has been going on before the 60s when I came into the world. And its the same bullshit still today. After more than 5 decades blacks HAVE GONE BACKWARDS and taken countries backwards. If they are so great like the movies, why is every black country in history – an absolute shithole and worse?
2
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Wait for AA and BEE/DEI.
You will not be able to even get a job because you are white!
1
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
It should be clear to any thinking person the nonsense when authorities tell you those masses are needed to keep the economy going. First principle, the economy serves the people – the people dont serve the economy. And millions of semi-literates, racists and criminals who never built a pinhead in their existence can only irreparably destroy what whites have built up over centuries.
7
0
Hide replies

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Did EMJ ban you. What a pos EMJ is.
Edited a day ago

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Whites shitting on Whites are far more dangerous than any jew. And unfortunately the White race is full of traitors and liberals. Apparently selling books or a good job is worth throwing lesser brothers under the bus and giving the country away.
Edited 2 days ago
3
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Just dont call Jones a jew, like I did, or he will block you.You can call a jew anything but when you call him jew, he is exposed. EMJ is a jew, hiding behind Catholic religion. Notice how he slanders us White peoples and everything that s of white Europe. And all his garbage”categories”. Jones has German jewish heritage. Thats [show more]
Edited a day ago
2
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Sadly those whites(I have brothers like that), just cant see through the fraud. They have no other background and have been educated in MU, Minneapolis Uni and Hollywood jewish poison. They are warped. It is devastating. The only salvation, for me, is to know the deepest truth. Its a solitary journey.
Edited a day ago
3
0

2 days ago
glasiad
The future is NOT in political parties of any stripe. The future lies in direct representatives answerable and accountable only to their constituents.
6
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
I think Mark Collett is an excellent speaker and person. And I entirely support his mission.
12
0

2 days ago
Colin-Mark
I concur
4

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 4,629

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sun, Nov 3, 2024 — Published post. Transcript completed = 45/45 mins. Transcript Quality = 5/5. Includes Odysee and BitChute comments (40).

Eva Vlaardingerbroek – Full Speech at CPAC Hungary – Apr 25, 2024 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 03 May 2024 01:56:03 +0000

Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Full Speech at CPAC Hungary

The Forbidden Truth

Thu, Apr 25, 2024

[In this video Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch political commentator, gives a speech at the CPAC Hungary event held on April 25-26, 2024, with over 3,000 participants, and 80 speakers.

Here message is that the European “elites” have betrayed their people through their agenda of implementing the “Great Replacement” flooding Europe with hordes of non-Whites, and that it is time to fight back by replacing the EU, else European civilisation will be destroyed.

– KATANA]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYUMZ4fh7o8&t=318s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYRjaQxpDsA

Published on Thu, Apr 25, 2024

Description

5:20 / 12:40
Eva Vlaardingerbroek full speech at CPAC Hungary
RightVoiceRefined
273 subscribers
Subscribe
115
Share
Clip
2,377 views
Apr 28, 2024 #CPACHungary

Here it is! The full speech I gave at #CPACHungary that the establishment is currently losing its absolute mind over.
I spoke the forbidden truth: The Great Replacement is no longer a theory – it’s reality. White Europeans are being replaced in their own countries at an ever accelerating rate and it will mean the end of our civilization as we know it if we don’t turn things around.
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
RightVoiceRefined
273 subscribers
Videos
About
33 Comments
===========

https://www.cpachungary.com/en/

CPAC HUNGARY 2024: AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION OF NATIONAL FORCES HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
The Center for Fundamental Rights has concluded a more successful CPAC Hungary than ever before. A coalition of pro-peace, anti-globalist forces was formed at the third conservative jamboree, and now the international right from Europe to America is joining forces for the elections.
This year’s CPAC Hungary attracted an unprecedented three thousand participants. The event was attended by nearly 500 foreign guests from six continents and featured a total of 80 speakers, including two sitting prime ministers, Viktor Orbán and Irakli Kobakhidze, and three former Prime Ministers, including Tony Abbott, Mateusz Moriawecki and Janez Janša, seven ministers (five Hungarians and two Israelis), ten political party leaders, including Santiago Abascal, Geert Wilders and Tom van Grieken, three US Congressman (Andy Harris, Paul Gosar, Keith Self) and seven Polish political leaders. There was no shortage of video messages, with Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, Vivek Ramaswamy fourthermore André Ventura, founder of the Portuguese Chega! party, encouraging the Hungarian audience to stand up for their struggles.
The real media, the real news media network, was represented by 36 media brands from 13 countries, with 140 press representatives. There were also 50 exhibiting partners, including think tanks from the US and Central Europe, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy and Poland.

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 1,562 – 12:40 mins)

Hello, Hungary.

Hello, Budapest.

Hello, fellow Europeans and American friends.

Thank you so much for having me. Allow me to skip formalities for a moment and dive right into a subject that is not so cheerful, but very, very necessary to discuss.

Let me walk you through the past seven days in Europe.

This week in Stockholm, three elderly women in their seventies were stabbed in broad daylight on the streets. In London, four people were stabbed in a time span of just 42 hours. In Paris, hundreds of African migrants took to the street to riot. And in Brigolo, also in France, yet another church was burned down to the ground.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is just a few incidents in just a couple of days on our beautiful continent. But we all know that these incidents aren’t “incidents” anymore.

If there’s one thing that’s for sure, is that we know, and our governments also know, that there is a link between mass migration and crime.

In the Dutch city of Dordrecht, something interesting happened the other day. They announced, and this is a small city in the Netherlands, in my home country, that a new asylum centre will be put in that little town. And what did the municipality do? They said:

“We are going to offer citizens who live in the vicinity of this centre €1,000 to take extra safety measures.”

Our new reality in Europe consists of frequent rapes, stabbings, killings, murders, shootings, even beheadings. But let me be clear about one thing. This did not used to happen before. This is a newly imported problem!

Samuel P. Huntington predicted this over 25 years ago when he wrote, and I quote:

“In the new world of mass migration, the most pervasive, important and dangerous conflicts will not be between the social classes. They will not be between the rich and the poor. They will be between peoples belonging to different cultural entities. Tribal wars and ethnic conflicts will occur within civilisations.”

Well, boy, was he right! And the worst part is we as a society seem to have become indifferent to it. When another White boy, or a White girl dies at the hands of an immigrant, we might shake our head, we might let out a sigh. We might even get angry for a minute or two. And then we go on with our lives. We offer the family thoughts and prayers, but nothing ever changes!

Ladies and gentlemen, what does that say about us? This is a response of a society that has already given up. A society that has already accepted it’s defeat.

But is this true? Have we given up? Do we really accept the new reality that our globalist leaders have in mind for us?

I know one thing for sure, and that is that if nothing changes, if we don’t start to seriously fight for our continent, for our religion, for our people, our countries, then this time that we live in will go down in history as the time in which Western nations no longer had to get invaded by hostile armies in order to be conquered. This time will then go down in history as the period in which the invader was actively invited in by a corrupt elite! And not only did this corrupt elite invite the enemy in, they made the native population pay for it, too!

Everyone who has eyes can see it. The native, White, Christian European population is being replaced at an ever accelerating rate.

Let me back this up for you with some statistics from my home country. Let’s take Amsterdam, the capital. Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants.

And of course, most of these immigrants come from non-Christian, non-Western African and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion; the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities.

[05:22]

But let’s look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion; native population outnumbered. Brussels, colour me shocked! 70% migrants. Conclusion; native population majorly outnumbered. And other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon, if they haven’t already.

So I’m going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The Great Replacement Theory is no longer a theory, it’s reality!

And what’s interesting about “replacement” is that the establishment will either deny its existence, or when they admit to it, they say that it’s a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent.

Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate Pope, Frans Timmermans already stated in 2015 that:

“Diversity is humanity’s destiny! And that Europe will be diverse!”

And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the word “diversity”. It means less White people, less of you!

Imagine this in an Asian or an African country. Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable! Unimaginable!

So what in the world is wrong with our leaders?

The underlying sentiment of what they say is always the same. Our establishment claims that White people are evil and that our history is somehow fundamentally different from that of others. Consciously or unconsciously, they have sucked up the lies and the anti-White dogmas of the neo-Marxist Critical Race Theory.

That’s why the totalitarians in Brussels are trying to force you, the Hungarian people, a sovereign nation, to accept immigrants, despite the fact that the population has said no, and so has the government.

But make no mistake, the majority of the Dutch people haven’t asked for this either. Just like Brussels is forcing Hungary to accept these hordes of immigrants, they are doing the same now, even in the smallest of towns in the Netherlands. No part may remain Dutch in the traditional sense of the word. No part of Europe may remain European.

And it’s not difficult to understand why. If the old Europe still exists in certain places, then people will be able to compare the new Europe to the old. And news-flash, they will prefer the old. That’s why the Eurocrats hate Hungary so much!

And their message is clear:

“Our way of life, our Christian religion, our nations, they have to go. Without exception!”

Their vision of the future is the neo-liberal, unrecognizable Europe, where every city becomes kind of like Brussels. Ugly, dirty, unsafe, zero social cohesion, where the buildings are constantly under construction and they never, ever seem to finish. And even when they do, the end result is uglier somehow than what they started with and what are we left with? A permanent state of isolation, confusion and disorientation! Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the New [Jew] World Order!

[applause]

[9:11]

So what’s the antidote? A strong Christian Europe of sovereign nation states!

That’s why we need to outright reject the lie that nationalism causes war. It’s not nationalism or national sovereignty that causes war. It’s expansionism. And where in Europe do we find that nowadays? In one place and one place only. Brussels!

[applause]

Isn’t it funny how the same people who erode our national sovereignty and love to do it, give it all up to the Eurocrats there, that those people are now telling us that we need to spend billions and billions of Euros on the national sovereignty of Ukraine? It’s a joke, honestly! And it’s a pretty sick, expensive and dangerous joke.

During a recent interview, I got asked by an interviewer:

“Do you think that you ever go too far? Do you think that you’re ever too radical?”

I thought about it for a second and I said:

“No, no, I don’t think I go too far.

[applause]

Truth be told, ladies and gentlemen, I think we in Europe do not go far enough! I think that if we really think about the organised structural attack on our civilisation, that we don’t do enough. Do we do enough to stop the attack on our families, on our continent, on our countries and our religion? When we hear about another murder, another stabbing of a young, innocent child, do we do enough? When we know that our national sovereignty has been given up in less than a century to Brussels, do we do enough? When we hear that Christian kids in Germany are now converting to Islam to fit in, do we do enough! I don’t think so!

The totalitarian institute of the European Union needs to come down. Let me be clear. I don’t believe in reforms when the foundation of your institution is rotten. And that is the case in Brussels. You can rebuild the house on top of it all you want, but it’s still going to crumble! So the only answer is the Tower of Babel needs to be destroyed.!

[applause].

Ladies and gentlemen, we are the daughters and sons of the greatest nations on earth!

[applause].

And we need to ask ourselves, what has happened to us? Where do we come from? And more importantly, where are we going? Our elites have declared a war on us! And now it is time for us to put on the full armour of God, fight back and win! Thank you so much!

[loud applause]

[12:40]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 5/3/2024 = 33)

@joachimvk5692
4 days ago
Great speech
11

@bally1213
3 days ago
Now that is some lady, not a single thing could anyone disagree with, unless you’re an import of course . I’m with you all the way, I hope all the right people are appreciating your efforts of bringing the truth. Thank you 󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
4

@jamespalmer6048
3 days ago
God Bless You
3

@ashm.5899
15 hours ago
Eva speaks the truth! Love her!
1

@kingalfredWA
2 days ago
30 million views
bravo Eva!
2

@PS-js9bj
23 hours ago
May God bless her, and her Guardian Angel take extra special care of her!

@TeamTrumpCGN
1 day ago
Truth. Thanks, Eva. WWG1WGA

@Coasterr200145
2 days ago
I agree with this woman 100%.

@bayouelton
3 days ago
God Bless that young woman. I hope she becomes the New Greta.
1

@Eiseman-1-
7 hours ago
Believe whatever you want but people were segregated for a reason.
1

@edhavnfun
1 day ago
As an Alabama , U.S.A. man, I am very proud to hear such a speech. I am in complete agreement with every thing you said. I am ready to die for my country. We are all i a revolution and if it takes it, we will fight.
A great civilization is conquered within before it is conquered without. Maga Maga Maga.
2

1 reply

@jonseidman1
1 day ago
Beautifully said! Even some of us in San Francisco feel the same way!
1

@1DougBeard
23 hours ago
She nailed it

@adamw116
3 days ago (edited)
Youtube is probably supressing the number of views
, 880 my ass!!! This should go SUPER VIRAL!!!
2

3 replies

@Arthera0
21 hours ago
they are. she even got a strike for hate speech. which is absurd

@WhyAreTheyOverHere
21 hours ago
Of course, the comments are disappearing down the NYC rathole quickly.

@adamw116
17 hours ago

@Arthera0 Distgusting if that algorithm was a person I don’t want to say what I’d want to do!

@grazzitdvram
23 hours ago (edited)
words words words, pretty words but just words and words are just wind without actions.

@theroofsedge
1 day ago (edited)
6:30 Did you say Europe will DIE-first or DIE-verse?

@captainmzungu2505
2 days ago
An Eva-future versus a Greta-future.
I know what I’ll choose

@theroofsedge
1 day ago
0:10 What happened when the social-scientists afffericaneyezed the wonderfully gentle European honey bee? 2:12

@BaltimoresBerzerker
7 hours ago
14

@Martin-iq8id
17 hours ago
Remigration
2

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 1,562

Total words in post = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Fri, May 3, 2024 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (33).

Laura Towler – This is Not a Game – PA Conference Speech – Oct 7, 2023 – Transcript

admin — Sun, 05 Nov 2023 10:17:59 +0000

Laura Towler

This is Not a Game

PA Conference Speech

Sat, Oct 7, 2023

[Laura Towler, deputy leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, gives a rallying heartfelt 2023 PA Conference speech.

“A good nationalist isn’t driven by hate. He is driven by love. The greater good will always come before individual gain. We do this because we love our people and we want to keep them safe. If we don’t succeed, if we continue down this path of open borders, …”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@LauraTowler:3/laura_towler_pa_conference_2023:1

https://patv.uk/this-is-not-a-game-laura-towlers-pa-conference-speech-2023/

Published on Sat, Oct 7, 2023

Description

This is Not a Game – Laura Towler’s PA Conference Speech 2023
October 17, 2023
1,718 views
240 Likes
2 Dislikes
Support
Save
3 Reposts
Share
Laura Towler
@LauraTowler
5,645 followers
Join
Following
Laura Towler’s conference speech from Patriotic Alternative’s 2023 conference. Laura discusses why nationalism is vital for our people and four years into Patriotic Alternative’s journey, discusses our strengths, weaknesses and reminds us why we are doing this.
Contact Laura: hello@wewereneverasked.co.uk
Follow Laura on Telegram:
https://t.me/lauratowler
Follow Laura on GAB:
https://gab.com/thisislaurat
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part
To support our work:
Purchase Grandma Towler’s tea and coffee:
https://www.grandmatowlers.co.uk/
Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/lauratowler
Support us on SubscribeStar with a one-off or monthly donation:
https://www.subscribestar.com/laura-towler
Crypto-currency info:
Bitcoin: bc1qv8yzkhmmfrsly3few6kgqt335gd8yneqyeqjlv
Ethereum: 0xf91dcc95D72Fd2b3690a8D38a268634706F73AB6
Monero: 43oEfWhKXPy1zjteQ5ik7SHqK75uwAAKteuTs4RMBJ5ocYjmszkpab
AKdmwXohdTec37LSGqLVtuR6hoTpQwRUnwTQsefUF
Zcash: t1fharihLFpZHooR1CncLWANrSJj95EGR6J
Litecoin: ltc1qnltlg0elff9gqm00pqs58s076y9vz3xv6lw7qh
Dash: XkCZxSPtGKYgK8NRXLgLDMy4UR9wM7Lqgt
File size
1.34 GB
Less
6.89
39 comments

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4.5 Stars

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 3,646 – 23:02 mins)

James Costello: She’s a dedicated activist, a leader, a business owner, a wife, a mother, and an inspiration to pro-White activists around Britain and through the world! She’s the glue, everyone will agree. She is the glue that keeps everything together. She remains defiant and unapologetic before the implacable forces of darkness.

An example of this is when she responded to a request from Yorkshire Tea not to drink their tea – because she didn’t support their diversity nonsense – by founding her own tea company!:

“Don’t drink our tea!”

“Okay! I’ll make my own company, thank you very much!”

That’s Grandma Towler’s, which everybody has no doubt been drinking today.

She’s the kind of woman that you want on your side when times are hard. A tireless advocate for our people, she is a real woman for all seasons.

Please welcome co-host of Tea Time with Sam and Laura, the deputy leader of Patriotic Alternative, the indefatigable Laura Towler!

[loud applause]

Laura Towler: Thank you. Thank you so much! So good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Patriotic Alternative 2023 conference. It’s great to be here. I hope you’re all having a wonderful time so far, and I hope you all enjoyed the tea and coffee on arrival.

My small business, Grandma Towler’s, is doing the refreshments and also the afternoon tea today. And it’s the biggest event by far that I’ve ever catered for.

There are almost, 200 people here today. We’ve grown by an extra third from our last conference, and this is without advertising the event at all. It’s just passing it through our chats and through our contacts and stuff. Imagine how many people we would have here if we could actually make it public and advertise it!

When I volunteered to do the afternoon tea today, I didn’t realise that I was volunteering to make 200 scones! And the number kept going up and up as more and more people kept buying more and more tickets. And Mark kept saying to me:

“Are you sure you want to do this? You can drop out if you like. We can get somebody else to do the catering.”

And I said:

“No. I’m not quitting. I am making the scones!”

So, five bags of flour, a bag of sugar, about 30 eggs, and a very messy kitchen later, I would just like to say, first of all, I hope you do enjoy the afternoon tea.

But also, I’d just like to take this opportunity before I begin with my speech to say thank you to all the support that you’ve given to Grandma Towler’s over the last three years.

As James mentioned, I have to be honest, I sort of started the company as a bit of a joke. It was a middle finger to all these brands and corporations that were taking the knee and bowing down to Black Lives Matter.

And I thought I’d say to them:

“Well screw you then! We don’t need you!”

[03:31]

I didn’t realise that three years on the business would still be going strong. And Grandma Towler’s supports me and Sam so that we can do this full-time, so that we can do nationalism full-time. And it’s such a great honour for us to be able to dedicate our lives to such a moral cause. So honestly, soppy moment. Thank you for supporting us from the bottom of my heart.!

[loud applause]

So my speech today is called, This is Not a Game. I absolutely love Patriotic Alternative conferences. They’re one of my highlights of the year, and I’ve been counting down the weeks to today. The reason that I love PA conferences is because it’s a rare opportunity for us to get together after a year of hard work, of protests and demos, long leafleting sessions in the rain and street stalls, and all the other incredible work that we do. We have a really positive and uplifting day. We get to listen to some great speakers, we get to eat some great food, we get to reminisce on the year that we’ve just had, and we get to look forward to the future together.

Patriotic Alternative is like a family for me. And I know that sounds a bit gay. [chuckling] If I heard somebody say that about another group, I’d probably think:

“God, get a life! Get some mates!”

But it’s true! I’m a huge introvert, and Patriotic Alternative is actually the first time in my life that I’ve ever looked forward to socialising. You can’t get me out otherwise! I spend my birthday with you guys. I’ve had the best conversations I’ve ever had in my life with the people in this room.

And when Sam and I found out that we were expecting our second baby [loud applause] who is expected to join us on the 20th of April, [chuckling] of all dates! [audience laughter and applause], … We didn’t do it on purpose! Okay, Nick Lowles*?

[* Founder of the anti-White organisation Hope not Hate (in 2004) and former editor of the “anti-fascist” Searchlight magazine.]

But when we found out that we were expecting another baby, we couldn’t wait to share it with you all.

The community that we’ve built at Patriotic Alternative will be the reason that we succeed. It’s what differentiates us from different organisations. Community building has always been the cornerstone of Patriotic Alternative, and the organisation was purposely set up that way. Because when you’re working alongside people that you have a strong bond with, you can weather any storm that’s thrown at you.

You’re not going to run away at the first sign of struggle or pushback. You’re going to confide in your friends who will have your back in return. You’re not going to quit at the first hurdle or indication of failure, whether that’s electoral failure or otherwise. You’re going to re-rally the troops and try again. And you’re not going to believe petty drama and rumours and attempts to undermine us, because, you know, your colleagues better than anybody else.

So our strong community is the foundation of Patriotic Alternative. But there’s something else that differentiates us from others as well. We are, and we will always be, 100% unapologetic and uncompromising in our stance!

[06:50]

Now, that might not sound like a bold thing to say in this room, but when you look at the wider sphere of British politics, how many politicians or talking heads can we say are as honest as Mark Collett?

[applause]

We are entirely honest about what we believe and what we want. Therefore it’s impossible to catch us out! We refuse to answer any question in a defensive manner. Our cause is moral and we don’t owe anybody an explanation. Your misrepresentations are on you, not us.

And we do not expect anything to be handed to us. We are entirely committed not simply to taking part in a system that’s set up to leave us ineffective, but to standing on our own feet, to being proudly radical! To following our own path and to securing a future, an existence for our people and a future for White children. Nothing will deter us!

Being the largest and most active nationalist organisation in the country often paints a big target on our back. However, being the tenacious bunch that we are, we always bounce back from attacks very quickly, or in the majority of cases, those attacks end up backfiring anyway.

Not content with their failed hit piece against us last year where Channel 4 Dispatches attempted to paint us as violent, uneducated thugs! You know, the documentary where they accidentally painted the far-Left as being violent, uneducated thugs, us as down to earth, reasonable people. Sam Melia as a total chad who can take on three Antifa by himself [chuckling], and their own undercover journalist, Elliot Doyle has been very, very serious! That documentary, a documentary that they’ve now removed from YouTube because every single comment was in support of us.

Well, this year the media had another shot at attacking us. Last month’s, Patriotic Alternative were upgraded from Channel 4 to the premiere news show in the country. The big boys came after us! We somehow managed to convince the BBC’s flagship news show to create a ten minute advert for us [chuckling]. And once again, we looked great! Mark batted away their allegations with ease and although they originally intended to paint us as extremists and even terrorists, they were left with one very meagre attack on us. Brace yourselves! This might shock a few of you. Mark recommended that people read Mein Kampf. Boohoo! Who cares? I think you should read it too.!

My favourite part of that documentary was when the journalist said to a normal lady, just a concerned local who was at an anti-migrant hotel protest:

“Do you know, that the leader of this group has sympathies for Adolf Hitler?”

To which she responded by saying:

“I understand that they always get slurred with ‘far-Right’ and ‘racist’ by groups like Stand Up to Racism, but I’m not sure that that’s the case.”

Wow! They really thought that they had the money shot there, and a member of the public just rolled her eyes and moved on. They underestimate the public who do not believe their lies anymore, and they underestimate how much support we have from the public, too.

[10:13]

There was another attempted attack on us this year. This year, in spring, our enemies wrote of a devastating split at Patriotic Alternative. We were finished, apparently. In reality, that was only ever wishful thinking by our enemies, who wanted us to be finished. We responded by keeping our focus and working hard and by holding the largest ever PA camp in July, which featured our biggest ever banner drop, our most successful Indigenous People’s Day celebrations in August. And here we are today, a third up on our last conference numbers, holding the largest ever non-Advertised event in PA’s history!

[long applause]

I hope those who doubted us feel very silly, but I doubt they have the ability to self reflect. There’s no doubt that we have the right approach in many ways and that we’re doing well in many ways. Our enemies don’t know how to handle us because they see all nationalists as drunken football hooligans who just want to spend their Saturday shouting at Stand Up to Racism and the police.

We’re not like that. We’re serious! We’re family men and women. We present ourselves professionally, and we’re smarter than our opposition, too. They have the ability to regurgitate what the BBC or their university lecturers tell them, but they have no ability to think for themselves. Educated, thoughtful, and well presented nationalists is a force that is very scary for them to comprehend. And their underestimation of us plays into our hands.

However, and there’s one point that I really want to hammer home in this speech. It’s important that while recognizing our strengths, we do not get comfortable. Patriotic Alternative is four years old now. We’re not a shiny new organisation anymore. It’s still a fun organisation to be part of, but we’re not launching new projects every month like we were at the start. We’re now really getting into the grind of what it means to be a serious political organisation. We need reliability. We need consistency. We need an understanding that this is a long struggle and a long project ahead of us.

As much as I’d love it to happen, Mark Collett is probably not going to be Prime Minister next year, unfortunately. But if we remain focused on our project and why we’re doing this, then Britain will return to greater heights and greater glories once more.

So why are we doing this? Well, I’d like to ask everybody in the room to consider something for a moment. I think many of us, if not all of us, have got a key event from our life. That maybe it was something that we read about or something that we experienced ourself or something that we saw, and it had a big impact on us. And it cemented in our brains why it’s important that we do what we do. This event could have punched you in the gut. It may have made you feel sick to your stomach. It may have made you angry or sad. Or all of the above.

[13:26]

But it’s an event that stayed with you for a long time, and it reiterates to you again and again why nationalism is important. For me, that event has always been the murder of Lee Rigby. I’m not ashamed to say that when I found out what happened to that poor young man, I cried. I thought about the pain that he went through and the pain that his family went through. I thought about how his brutal murder was completely avoidable, if only we had a ruling class who stood up for our interests!

However, in June of this year, another event took place that became the event for me. Annecy*. You’ll all be familiar with what happened there despite the system’s attempts to memory hole it. Six people, including four young children between the ages of 22 months and three years, were injured in a mass stabbing in a children’s playground by a 31 year old Syrian refugee called Abdalmasih Hanoun.

[* On 8 June 2023, a 31-year-old Syrian man injured two adults and four young children in Le Pâquier city park, Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France, in a mass stabbing attack.]

To clarify, a refugee walked into a children’s playground with a knife and tried to murder babies and young children by stabbing them to death in front of their mothers. I couldn’t get it out of my head for weeks. I replayed the scenario through in my mind a million times. What would I do if I was in the park with my daughter? Would I be able to save her? What if I froze with shock? I thought about every possible situation and how I would respond to it. What if I had the brake on the pram? What if my daughter was strapped in? What if I was facing the attacker? What if I wasn’t?

I googled “legal self defense weapons” and learnt that there aren’t any. I know that many other mothers and fathers in Patriotic Alternative feel the same way. We spoke about it quite a lot, and the vital, urgent and nonnegotiable desire that we have to keep our children safe. I spoke to aunts and uncles that were worried about their nieces and their nephews and grandparents who were worried about their grandchildren, and many more people who were just simply worried for their kin and their people and their race.

If we don’t succeed, if we continue down this path of open borders of nobody daring to even speak out, never mind do something about it, if we continue down this path of apologizing and tiptoeing around the issues of putting our people first, then Annecy will happen again! I’m not willing to risk that. And I know that you’re not either.

[16:06]

A good nationalist isn’t driven by hate. He is driven by love. Anger is a normal reaction to suffering, but it’s a love that we have for our people that makes us feel that way in the first place. A good nationalist also doesn’t do this for attention, or ego, or popularity, or money, or fame, or any of these trivial things. Even for somebody who may enjoy those things, they are inconsequential in the long run. The greater good will always come before individual gain.

We do this because we love our people and we want to keep them safe! We do this because we know the British are a people worth saving. We do this for Lee Rigby. For Lucy Lowe. For Emily Jones. For Chris Donald. For Ross Parker. For Aaron Dugmore. For Richard Everett. For P. C. Keith Blakelock. I could stand here and list you a thousand names.

We do it for the hundreds, if not thousands, of British people who would still be alive today if their lives were worth more than the need for so-called tolerance and diversity and the need for our deliberate demographic replacement!

We do this and we speak out even when their own families don’t. And we make no apologies for this, because they do not get to control the narrative when other people are worried about their children being next. We do this for the continuation and the legacy of the British. A proud and mighty people! Who, through sacrifice, intellect, strength and spirit, conquered the world, the skies, the seas, and who have offered the world the highest calibre of inventions, technology, healthcare, education, transport and culture ever known to man!

And we do this for our children. For Catherine Melia, for Sophia Collett, for all the babies and the children who are with us today, and the children and future children of all of our people. This is not a game! We simply cannot afford to lose.!

[applause]

So I reached my conclusion. And Sam always tells me off for saying that. I’m at my conclusion, [chuckling] but I’m going to say it!

There’s been a debate that’s been happening in British politics over the last couple of weeks. It’s a debate that’s been going on for a lot longer than that, but it’s been a hot topic over the last couple of weeks on political talk shows. It’s been trending on social media.

And that debate is whether Britain is a good place to live for black people. One side will argue:

“No, Britain is not a good place to live for black people. They are oppressed. They face racism every day!”

And the other side, presenting what is bestowed to us as the only other option in this debate, will say:

“You’re wrong! Britain is a good place to live for black people!”

And that’s the side that patriots are supposed to pick. A based black presenter on GB News is wheeled out to speak for us. It’s taken as granted that our demographic replacement is well and truly underway, and there’s nothing that we can do about it. But we should be thankful. We should be thankful that we’re making Britain a safe and welcoming country for people who we never even wanted to be here in the first place! We should be thankful because it absolves us of the sin of so-called “racism”. And there’s nothing worse than that!

[19:14]

Patriotic Alternative will not choose one of those two sides in this debate! Our answer is different. Is Britain a good place to live for black people? Our answer is, we don’t care! It’s time that we stopped debating whether Britain is a good place to live for black people, and we started discussing whether Britain is a good place to live for British people!

[applause]

Defiant, bold and devoted to our cause, we have made a great start as an organisation, and if we remain committed to the task at hand and continue to conduct ourselves in the way that we have done, I am confident that Patriotic Alternative will succeed.

Some of the best activists and figureheads, not just in nationalism, but in politics as a whole, sit in this room. Nobody in this country debates like Mark Collett, who makes people rage quit! Nobody nurtures, encourages, educates and develops people like Steve Blake. There’s not a single nationalist in this country who just gets things done like Joe Marsh. And he’s pretty handy with a felt tip pen as well. [chuckling] And nobody throws up a scaffolding stage by himself in the middle of a hundred Reds and shouts down a megaphone like Sam Melia.

We are setting the standard! We’re known and respected not only within Britain as a serious and dynamic organisation, but we’re recognised on a global scale as well. To quote, Hope Not Hate in their State of Hate 2023 report:

“PA continues to hold regional activities at a frequency unmatched among the UK far-Right!”

To get things right sometimes.

[applause]

And our work ethic and reputation has allowed us to form partnerships and relationships not only with various patriotic groups within our borders, but also with the premier nationalist organisations in other countries, such as the NJP [National Justice Party] in the States, and the Nordic Resistance Movement in the Nordic countries.

In four short years, we’ve taken the online movement and turned it into the defining force of British nationalism. Being a Patriotic Alternative activist is something to be proud of! We hold ourselves to high standards and those outside our organisation, whether friend or enemy. They know that if PA is involved, they’re in for a show.

This year we learnt that the Home Office are so worried about us that they’ve been speaking to the Electoral Commission in order to stop us becoming a political party. And, you know what? They are right to be worried about us. They should be scared!

I’m going to finish today not with a quote from a politician of the past, like I often do. I’m going to finish with a quote from a politician of the future. I’m going to finish with a quote from Mark Collett, spoken at this year’s Cannock demonstration. The Home Office are right to be scared of us because, as Mark says:

“They are not going to replace us. We are going to replace them!”

Thank you.

[loud applause]

[23:02]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/31/2023 = 39)

@VicTomised
14 days ago
Excellent speech.

31
1
Hide replies
Laura Towler
14 days ago
Thank you

11
0

@BritishGammon
14 days ago(edited)
19:24
“Is Britain a good place to live for black people?”
Our answer is, “we don’t care!”.

26
0
Hide replies
Avid Fan
14 days ago(edited)
Is it a good place to live for British people?
Even better.

14
0
Hide replies

@BritishGammon
14 days ago

4
0

@noreplacement
14 days ago
PA getting stronger. As are Laura’s speeches.

22
0

@TwentyFourHours
14 days ago
Amazing speech, this sums up PA better than anything I’ve heard before. I sincerely hope the traitors in power listen to this one day. The majority of people would agree with PA, given a fair say.

23
1
Hide replies
Avid Fan
14 days ago
Yes, a wonderful speech delivered with poise and dignity.

16
1
Hide replies

@MilosM.
14 days ago
Like I said on Marks channel – its great to see all white faces on the conference

23
2
Hide replies
Laura Towler
14 days ago
I dunno why that annoyed so many people

15
0
Avid Fan
14 days ago
Britons are indeed a mighty people. The peoples of the British Isles, particularly the English, have contributed more to humanity than the ancient Egyptians, ancient Athenians, and ancient Romans combined.

20
3
Hide replies

@MilosM
13 days ago
Ah, I don’t know much for Egyptians, but ancient Greeks and Romans definitely left us indebted to them eternally. History, law, philosophy, medicine, even available scientific discoveries at the time.

9
1
Lampshade Denier
14 days ago
Fantastic speech Laura! How lucky your children are to have you and Sam as parents.

14
0
Hide replies
Laura Towler
14 days ago
Aw that’s lovely, thank you!

12
0

@cheflad
13 days ago
thanks for mentioning Emily Jones ,such a beautiful young girls life ended prematurely on the Altar of unfettered mass immigration, and a precursor to Annecy.

11
0
Hide replies

@vettekid407
13 days ago
pure evil ….we must avenge one day

9
0

@Aunt-Sally
14 days ago
I always love Laura’s speeches and it’s even better listening to them for the second time around.

11
0

@popovacianen
14 days ago
\o

10
0
Nonbinary-cis-white-woman-of-colour
14 days ago
Nice to hear Ross Parker’s name mentioned.

8
0
Hide replies
Laura Towler
14 days ago
I believe he was one of the faces we carried for our “3 Peaks, 11 Lives” piece of activism this year too

9
0
Hide replies
Nonbinary-cis-white-woman-of-colour
12 days ago
Awesome. His slaying was just as savage as Lee Rigby’s. He was an acquaintance of a friend.

1
0
Dylbob
13 days ago
great speech sister! God bless o/

7
0

@BMC1488
13 days ago
Brilliant speech! We love you, Laura :smiley:

7
0

@PureNomad
14 days ago
<3 that pencilled in birth date for baby #2

7
0

@FlankerVT
13 days ago
Beautiful. In the middle I actually started crying. A true nationalist does what he does for love, not hate.

6
0

@vettekid407
13 days ago
Laura you’re awesome

6
0
MichaelB
12 days ago
Hail PA! Keep growing!

5
0

@EnglishRose
13 days ago
absolutely outstanding speech. PA goes from strength to strength and from the calibre of its leadership one can see why. Thank you

5
0
The Westernist
10 days ago
Fantastic speech Laura, and inspiring work all around.

1
0
Lost in Western Society
9 days ago
Beautiful speech and congrats on Baby number two.
Much love from Germany.

1
0
Hide replies
Laura Towler
8 days ago
Thanks very much

Grav CMS
13 days ago(edited)
psycho murderers exist as white people even in homogeneous societies.
this isn’t the advantage of a ethnicity homogeneous society

0
3
Man Animal
6 days ago
Outstanding

@baza41
11 days ago
It’s a shame all nationalist groups can’t see they have more in common than divides them and just get along with each other.

Hide replies
Laura Towler
10 days ago
We work with lots of other nationalist groups and individuals but unfortunately some people put their own ego before the greater good

0
0

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 3,646

Total words in post = 4,636
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sun, Nov 5, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (39).

Joel Davis – On Activist Politics and White Advocacy – PA Conference Speech – Oct 7, 2023 – Transcript

admin — Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:23:29 +0000

Joel Davis

On Activist Politics and White Advocacy

PA Conference Speech

Sat, Oct 7, 2023

[Australian White activist Joel Davis gives his debut speech to PA’s recent 2023 Conference in England. He stresses the importance of focussed activism in gaining the support of the public, and calls for:

“… having a ‘one dimensional framing’, or a ‘one dimensional politics’, which in a nutshell is reducing politics to a ‘pro-White, anti-White polarity’. Trying to analyze every issue through the lens of race. A kind of race reductionism.”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@PatrioticAlternative:f/joel_davis_pa_conference_2023:4

Published on Sat, Oct 7, 2023

Description

On Activist Politics and White Advocacy – Joel Davis’s PA Conference Speech 2023
October 20, 2023
2,399 views
213 Likes
2 Dislikes
Support
Save
2 Reposts
Share
Patriotic Alternative
@PatrioticAlternative
2,307 followers
Join
Follow
Joel Davis’s conference speech from Patriotic Alternative’s 2023 conference.
Find a list of his social media, ways to donate and his videos here:
https://bio.link/joeldavis
File size
1.46 GB
Less
7.28
52 comments

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 4,195 – 25:08 mins)

James Costello: Now for the up and coming star of the pro-White cause, specializing in political philosophy, he’s made waves on YouTube, Substack, Twitter and Cozy TV. The YouTube channel The Joel and Blair Show has been a big success until it was recently nuked by “jewTube”, whatever that means!

Known for his insightful, thought provoking, no nonsense takes, an identitarian commentator and activist with a focus on White advocacy and political strategy, he’s a leading voice in the Australian White nationalist movement. Here to discuss the distinction between activist and electoralist politics and why this distinction is so important for White Identity Politics, please welcome, all the way from Australia, the amazing Joel Davis!

[applause]

Joel Davis: Just want to say thanks for inviting me out. It’s great to be here. Obviously, I’m an Australian, but this is my ancestral homeland, so the struggle here means a lot to me. It means more than anywhere else in the world except Australia, frankly, for obvious reasons.

So it’s great to be here, it’s great to meet all of you. I’ve met some of you before, but it’s just great to have a whole bunch of “racist” Anglos in a room together.

[applause]

But yeah, today it’s going to be preaching to the choir. You pretty much already kind of get it, otherwise you wouldn’t be here.

But nevertheless, all the speeches have basically been saying stuff we already believe, so mine will as well. It’s just a good excuse, I guess, to get everyone in a room. But there’s, I don’t know, maybe some ideas here that might be useful to people.

So basically, what I’m just going to discuss is a basic collection of few ideas around political strategy that have evolved for me in my time, the last past few years. Engaging a lot with White nationalist leaders from around the world, kind of analyzing problems in different countries, discussing ideas with leaders. So hopefully you get something out of this.

The basic idea is that I think there’s two core modes that you could really break mass politics down into. You could say there’s “activism” and “electoralism”. And activism is fundamentally about changing what’s popular, whereas electoralism is about leveraging what’s popular, I would say. And by popularity, I mean it’s not just opinion polls. We had a recent opinion poll, I think from Germany that said something like 70% to 80% of Germans are against mass immigration.

But if you look at the parties these people vote for, I mean, this is including people who vote for Leftist parties, who vote for centrist parties. If you’re against mass immigration, why aren’t you at least voting for the Alternative für Deutschland [AfD], the only party that’s actually against it in Germany?

So it’s like, yes, people will tick boxes on opinion polls that they’re against something, but they aren’t actually, politically, conscious of even a very basic step of voting for the correct party to align with your belief. Or perhaps they care about mass immigration, but they care more about, I don’t know, getting their taxes down or I don’t even know what goes through people’s heads.

The masses are frankly, whilst often sympathetic to our talking points, politically retarded! [audience stirs] So popularity is really, … You don’t have to clap that, it’s horrifying! [laughter] But popularity you should really conceive of it more in terms of a kind of psycho-social pressure system.

[04:16]

So if you are operating in professional politics, that pressure system is upon you. It isn’t just what opinion polls say. In Australia, they do opinion polls all the time about, does Australia need more people? And 70%, 80% say:

“No, we don’t need more people!”

But all the major parties keep bringing in more people. Why? Because there is a pressure system. The mass media, all the interest groups behind the mass media, the lobby groups, they represent, the word “racist” and so on, that creates a condition whereby you can get away with going against public opinion. And it’s very difficult to stand with positive public opinion.

Like if you stand against mass immigration, you’re an “extremist”, even though three quarters of the country agree with you according to every opinion poll.

So activism is not just about changing how opinion polls occur, but changing how that pressure system functions, I would say.

And an organisation like Patriotic Alternative, obviously there’s aspirations to engage in electoral politics. I’m not saying engaging in electoral politics is bad. But fundamentally what you guys are doing, from what I can see, is you’re an activist organisation that has aspirations to change hearts and minds, to change the way people talk about these issues, the way people think about these issues, not just win an election.

There was a recent book that was written by an Italian guy, Guido Taietti. I didn’t read the book because it hasn’t been translated into English, it’s only in Italian. There was a few reviews and a podcast that was done. There was a review in the Unz Review, I think, and in Counter-Currents, and there was a podcast that was done by someone with him where they were speaking English that Counter-Currents put out. And had some interesting ideas, a lot of ideas that I share.

A guy from CasaPound, if you guys have heard of that organisation. And he identified, … There’s kind of two main fundamental relationships in contemporary political communication. And this kind of corresponds to my activist-electoralist distinction. One is you’ve got the kind of activist-sympathizer relationship and then you’ve got the kind of political professional voter relationship.

Now, voters are a low attention span, low information, low agency market, essentially that’s easily manipulated by the kind of institutionalised forces of professional politics, obviously through the media. But there’s this kind of subterranean architecture, obviously, of NGOs, think tanks, foundations and so on, that feed into the media, that condition their talking points and align them with policy agendas and so on, that you can’t really mobilise voters against this very successfully because it’s too complex, basically, just as I mentioned before about these German opinion polls.

[07:00]

And even when you can mobilise voters against it, when you have a, quote, unquote, “populist movement” we’ve seen this with Trumpism in the United States. It’s so ideologically vapid because it becomes this kind of personalised attachment:

“I just like Trump because I’ve got these vague sentiments basically that he’s standing up for Americans!”

But then that kind of ideological vapidity can be just filled in by these conservative establishments, fake opposition groups, to corral the agenda into safe avenues, and so on. And it doesn’t really materialise in any kind of meaningful change.

And so working within this professional politician-voter relationship is just very difficult unless you have billions of dollars. We just simply don’t have those resources.

The activist-sympathizer relationship, however, is something that we can get a lot more traction with. And in the activist-sympathizer relationship, it’s not about trying to win elections. It’s about trying to change the terms under which the political discourse within which elections are even conducted are set. So we can look at models for this.

Like, for example, feminism. There’s no feminist party that’s running any of our countries that won 51% of the vote and formed a government.

But obviously feminism has won! It’s pretty much dominating the institutions of every major Western country, all the major political parties. That’s an activist movement. It didn’t try to go out and win elections and form a feminist political movement that would contest for local council districts or something. It formed an organised activist pressure movement that was able to kind of plug itself into the political establishment and change the discourse around women’s rights or whatever. And we’ve seen the results. And the same model you can see with environmentalism, with gay rights, et cetera.

And I think this is the kind of model that we should look to more when thinking about who we are and what we’re doing as White advocates.

So I think as well, another idea that I think is quite useful for kind of understanding what we’re doing here and how to kind of stay the course is what I call “having a one dimensional framing”, or a “one dimensional politics”, which in a nutshell is reducing politics to a “pro-White, anti-White polarity”. Trying to analyze every issue through the lens of race. A kind of race reductionism. Marxists talk about class reductionism. Everything is really about proletariat versus bourgeoisie or whatever. We should not obviously not be like Marxists, but we should do the same thing, but with race, I believe, break every issue down.

[09:47]

So the gentleman earlier was speaking about climate change and about how climate change is basically just a way to transfer resources from White countries to non-White countries, frankly. That’s what the policies actually are. Whatever your position is on climate change, we should talk about it like that rather than simply talking about climate change is fake and you got all these boomer conservatives railing against it, but no one kind of points out the elephant in the room, which is that it’s very clearly an anti-White agenda!

[applause]

And this is clear. I think also this polarity, we need to map it on to the Left-Right distinction. A lot of people, myself included, would describe themselves at one point or another as a Third Positionist. We got to transcend the Left-Right distinction and so on.

I think this kind of thinking, what I call “ideological hipsterism”, which I’ve been as guilty of as anyone in the past, is a waste of energy and a waste of time! And it just confuses people. We know voters are that stupid, the masses are that stupid that the majority of Germans are against mass immigration, yet, as I said, they can’t even select the right party to vote for!

Going on about Third Positionism and bickering about what’s real “fascism” or something. It might be intellectually edifying, but it’s not actually going to get anywhere! We need to have an approach that cuts through the bullshit – in an intellectually defensible way, nevertheless – that can map onto the real polarisation that people feel every day, which is a Left-Right polarisation. Particularly, I think, in the United States and the Anglo-sphere because we have these two party systems. I’ve noticed this in Australia especially since Covid this kind of social mapping of Leftists and Right-wingers that didn’t really exist ten years ago, where social groups are getting split apart because people that are more conservative, whatever that means, can’t handle being around Leftists anymore and vice versa.

And this is a good thing, because it’s clear that the Left’s number one priority is the anti-White agenda. There’s literally no concern that they have that they won’t immediately toss or compromise if it conflicts with their anti-White goals. You saw this with Covid in the United States:

“Covid’s this big problem! We’ve got a lockdown! Everyone don’t go in public, but, you know, Black Lives Matter want to do marches now because George Floyd had a drug overdose. So now, fuck that! Everyone in the streets! The real public health crisis is racism!”

We see this on so many issues:

“Environmentalism is really bad! Global warming, we’ve got too many emissions. Let’s just import another million Pakistanis that are going to burn as much coal as possible when they get here because their carbon footprint doesn’t matter because if you think it does, you’re a racist!”

Feminism:

“There’s a rape culture! Let’s import a bunch of Pakistani rape gangs!”

And you guys get the message. So that polarity already exists.

[12:46]

And another hot take that I want to give you is that the Left are the real racists! But not in the way that Dinesh D’Souza describes it, in the sense that the Left hate White people, obviously, right, they are actually racist. Where conservatives they’re not racist. That’s the problem! I wish the Right were the real racists! That’s our job is to make that happen!

[applause]

And that’s key because we’re not really going to be able to convert Leftists. Leftists are already aware of race. They’re fully aware of race and they’ve chosen the other side. Whereas conservatives are sleepwalking through reality! Literally, they are colour-blind. And they can’t perceive reality as a result of it because there’s these mental blocks put in the heads of so many people through the way that people have been conditioned by our culture.

Our job is to open their eyes to race. Once you see it, you see it everywhere then all of a sudden the political landscape makes sense. And if someone is already identifying on the Right, unless it’s because they have an Asian girlfriend or wife or something or whatever, that’s really holding them back from embracing racial identitarianism.

If it’s a normal White person who sees themselves as Right-wing and they’re sick of the tranny nonsense and all the immigrants and so on, once they see it, they can’t un-see it. And then they’re on our side. And that’s the activist-sympathizer relationship. Our job is developing a larger and larger cadre of sympathizers that will then permeate social institutions.

And that’s how you get real change, because that’s what the Left did. The Left didn’t win opinion polls. They didn’t get one data:

“51% of the population now thinks that transgenderism is real and not a mental illness. Now we can do the trans agenda!”

No! They knew that their ideas were unpopular but they built a cadre of sympathizers with a focused and direct ideology. And look where that’s got them.

So I think that needs to be the central focus of what we’re doing, and I think it already is for the people in this room, largely from what I can tell. But I think it’s an important thing to maintain in our minds and to talk about clearly to defend what we’re doing here.

So the other component of this is I think our message to the broadly self identified Right is that we are the only real, true foundational opposition to the Leftist paradigm and Leftists in general, Leftist power. And they make it clear Leftists do our job for us. They identify us as their main enemy. And they make it very clear what they stand for.

And so someone’s already agreeing that:

“Well man! These Lefties and their agenda it’s horrible what they’re doing!”

It’s not that much of a leap to say:

“Okay, well, we are the only real opposition so what do you want? Do you want total victory over them!”

Well, that’s only going to occur if we are elevated. Teaching the Right-wing to stop canceling people for being too Right-wing basically is a large portion of our job.

[15:46]

And you can already see this process starting to gradually occur, I think across the Anglo-sphere in conservative media world, where there’s more and more acquiescence to a lot of racial talking points and shifting tides in the discourse because of the work that’s been done since 2015, the emergence of the Alt-Right to today.

I think we need to humanise a lot of these people in the conservative movement. Some people get this kind of mentality that everybody in the entire conservative movement is some kind of agent that’s getting paid off by these networks of intelligence agencies. And, or, Mossad has a video of them, like raping a three year old! And they’ll never come around at any talking point or never make any adjustments to their position. And whilst we should hate them and we should call them out as fake opposition, I think this is a strategic misstep. Our pressure actually does tell, there’s a lot of people in the conservative movement who actually their minds can be changed and they can become more radical over time.

We should have, I think, faith in our capacity to transform the culture, not support the conservative Party, obviously. We’re in the kind of realm of activism here. More about changing attitudes, changing the Overton Window, so to speak, where it lands in the kind of Right-wing cultural space. I think that’s an area where we’re going to win regardless. Even if we do a bad job, we have so much momentum there it’s already happening, as Tony mentioned “our idea, its time has come”, and it’s somewhat inevitable.

But I think so much of our work is about accelerating that kind of transformation of the Right, the racializing of the Right.

Now, another few points to make is that focus and prioritisation, not mere agreement, really has to be the aim of the activists.

As I said, we can do opinion polls on the key issues that we care about and the people are with us, but they’re not focused! They don’t put it as the number one priority in their politics. They aren’t kind of convicted like the people in this room are around these issues.

And so, so much of what we’re doing is not just like winning them over to agreeing with us, but it is about radicalising them! About making them more angry! Making them more focused, making them more racist!

That’s really like the essence of what the activist is doing. Because what’s happening to our people, what’s happening to our race is really a “crisis of the will”.

[18:15]

The majority of our race is demoralised. It’s not as if it’s an intellectual thing and everyone has been ideologically convinced in this abstract way. They’ve heard all the arguments from Ben Shapiro, and they’re not interested in our movement. No, it’s based in these kind of more primal emotional states of fear, of, as I said, demoralisation, self hatred and so on. These mental blocks that are placed in this kind of pre rational state. And so much of what we’re doing is about energizing the will in our people to stand up!

And that’s why it’s so important to have, even if you guys might get demoralised sometimes when you do a demonstration and there’s 50 of you and there’s 200 Antifa – I’m not saying that’s happened, but I don’t know all the details. But I’ve been in experiences like that where I’ve gone to protest, like, a Drag Queen Story Hour and there’s ten of us and, like, 200 communists! And it feels like shit! It’s horrible. It’s horrifying! And it creates this impression that they have the people behind them and we’re these crazy lunatics!

Whereas the average person would agree with us that’s walking past on the street. But they’re walking past on the street doing nothing! They don’t give a fuck! That’s the problem.

And so much of what we’re doing is about turning on that “will”. And when people see a real opposition movement putting their bodies in the street, taking the blows from the enemy, vocalizing and modeling our belief system, that’s powerful! And it might take a while to fully transform things in the unconscious of a lot of people’s thought processes, but it really does make a difference.

The majority of people are not free thinkers. They’re not first movers, they’re not creative, they’re not strong willed. Most people are conformists. They need to see other people modeling a way of thinking, modeling a way of behaving before they’ll even conceive of it as a possibility for themselves. And so don’t ever be demoralised.

Whenever you guys do demonstrations and it feels like maybe it was a bad one or you’re outnumbered or it didn’t quite have the effect that it had on the day, because if you’re just relentless and consistent and keep showing up and keep showing the people that there’s a real opposition to what’s happening to our people, it will take an effect! And in ways that you might not actually realise, it might take many years.

I know in my personal life, I’ve been annoying everyone that I know, all the normies, my whole family or whatever, about racial issues for years, and it was irritating to most of them for many years. And now there’s media articles written about me about how I’m a neo-Nazi, and they all think it’s great and they’re so proud of what I’m doing.

[applause]

It’s cool! It’s nice to see on a personal level. But more importantly, it shows that because they’ve had me in their life being like this hardcore, ideological racist, year after year, after year, after year, after year, it becomes normal to them to think like that.

[21:06]

And then when they encounter some act of diversity enrichment that is irritating, they perceive it differently as a result. So, yeah, that’s so important.

Also, another thing that I also think I’ve also done wrong in the past is putting too much focus., … And this goes to the ideological hipsterism point again, on other issues. A lot of the movement focused, I think too much on Covid, or I got too fixated on the war in Ukraine for a while. And these issues are important, but at the end of the day it’s overcomplicating things in a way. We just end up in these internal disputes within people that are already racist about what other add-ons we want to put on to our racism.

And this really dilutes in many ways the power of the message. Because our job isn’t to work out all the problems of the government and come up with a complete policy stack about what our foreign policy and tax policy and all of these things need to be. Our job is to represent the pro-White viewpoint!

And the activists, the advantage of the activists, going back to the feminist movement as an example, they didn’t have to come to the government. They didn’t see themselves necessarily coming to the State with a full set of:

“This is how the government should run and we should be in charge of the government!”

They just go:

“This is the feminist core issues. This is what we believe, this is what our complaints are!”

And they hammer those points!

And I think in many ways our movement would be well served by adopting some of those tactics in our messaging because all the other issues are represented except the racial issue. That’s the one issue that always gets jettisoned by conservatives and they want to focus on anything else that they possibly can, because that’s the one issue that you get targeted for the most, obviously.

And so my stance more recently has been to really just try to avoid talking about almost anything else but White advocacy, whenever I do anything.

Basically just be like a 100% spurg about it, twenty four seven! And just not even allow myself to think outside that box. Almost to constrain myself to maximize the amount of output that I have on this one issue. Because it’s the glaring obvious central issue at the core of everything that’s more important than anything else, frankly, in the entire political process right now, and in society, is securing a future for our people!

So something to consider. Not that no one should ever talk about anything else or what have you, but I think it’s something to consider.

[24:00]

And also simplicity is key to a winning message. Piling on too much excess can kind of drown out the position. I remember there was a lot of discussion at one point, I would say like 2018, 2019 in the broad online scene debating:

“Should we be Nazbols? Should we be racist liberals? Do White people want to be free market or do White people want to have socialism?”

And it’s like, I don’t really give a fuck! I just want to win! We can figure that out later. A lot of these things actually are quite counterproductive, I would say probably more on the socialist side.

But if we can win, I don’t give a shit about the economic policy. I don’t give a shit about the foreign policy. I just care about White people winning!

[applause]

So, yeah, so that’s basically the main stuff that I wanted to say here. But I hope that provoked some thoughts. And again, thank you for having me. It’s been fantastic!

And hail victory!

[loud applause]

[25:08]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/28/2023 = 52)

renunciate
8 days ago
Bless this Aussie for making such a long journey to speak at PA.
Reply
31

DOLO
8 days ago
Good speech.
Reply
28

Welsh Nationalist
8 days ago
Top speech
Reply
23

Lampshade Denier
8 days ago
Joel is an incredible speaker!
Reply
18
0
Hide replies

@eddiesdreaming
5 days ago
isnt he just
incredible was the first word i used to.
Reply
2

Avid Fan
8 days ago
Engrossing analysis.
Reply
18

The Belting Balaclava
8 days ago
Joel’s approach to strategy is top notch.
Reply
14

renunciate
8 days ago
The masses vote for the group that can win. It’s driven by fear that if the use their vote on a party that has no chance, then the “horrible” party will win.
Reply
14
0

@TwentyFourHours
8 days ago
Joel has an incredibly incisive approach and he’s done some excellent work.
Reply
13
0

@Stan1
8 days ago
Wow, that was a storming speech, and some very poignant takes.
I totally agree about the simplicity message, and driving the whole narrative around the main concerns we face – preserving a future for our people.
Reply
12

MasterOfStf
7 days ago
Good speech, Joel Davis is awesome. Follow him on social media for hot takes.
Reply
10
0

@PureNomad
8 days ago
I really like Joel (so wish I’d have gone to this conference tbh). Yes he has a slightly subdued delivery style, but the message still came through strong.
I totally agree a key battle with most people isn’t getting them to agree with nationalist issues (most know we’ve been flooded with too many ppl that don’t accept our values/way of life), but the fact people are naturally conformists, and have been brainwashed to believe they shouldn’t openly think that way.
Hail Victory Joel
Reply
7
0

@larkascending
8 days ago(edited)
I don’t like his use of the term racist. Like he said, people are dumb and they may just see soundbites, select quotes, etc. to judge PA and Joel Davis. I don’t think the term is useful. It is too amorphous, ideologically motivated and with too many cultural connotations to really describe anything of value. It conflates anything to do with race relations, racial hatred, biology/(divergent) human evolution/human taxonomy in often nonsensical & contradictory ways. When someone uses the term racist I just think they are too ideologically motivated to have a good-faith, factual & honest conversation about race.
Reply
9
2
Hide replies

@PureNomad
8 days ago
Tad harsh. I think you are reading slightly more into it, than was intended. For me he used it as an ice breaker. Don’t forget Australians are still very masculine, compared to our far too feminised Europeans.
Reply
2
3
Hide replies

The Belting Balaclava
8 days ago
Being intentional with the language you use in a formal political setting has nothing to do with masculinity.
Reply
5
0
Hide replies

Wight Kang
7 days ago(edited)
It is a strategy of not allowing enemy language to control us. We’re not going to go on the defensive when called racist since racist just means White person who does not cuck.
The answer to “are you racist?” should be “yes” and then you move on to pro-White advocacy. Saying “no” means they follow it up with an endless series of qualifiers which always end up with you supporting diversity and anti-White agendas.
Reply
0
2
Hide replies

@larkascending
7 days ago
I would never say “no” I am not a racist. I would articulate that the term does not have a consistent, clear, or useful definition. By saying “yes” I am a racist, I argue you are playing into their framing and “allowing enemy language to control us” and define us. Your opponent and audience will know where to put you and ignore you, because you have just placed yourself as the enemy. We should be influencing people, not just antagonising them or playing into enemy stereotypes.
Terms like anti-Semite, transphobe, xenophobe, etc. are all like that, they are nonsense words which are designed to frame the debate in the enemy’s favour. They frame any and all criticism of topics like migration as solely motivated by irrational fear or hatred. They should not be part of our vocabulary, at least unironically.
Less
Reply
3

The Belting Balaclava
7 days ago
The best response to “are you a racist” is to 1) Not engage, as it only further legitimizes them (this is something leftist postmodernists understand fairly well) or 2) Ask them to define the term “racist”. If they answer “it means you hate other races” then I would answer “no” as I truthfully do not hate other races. If they say “it means you don’t believe that all races are equal” then I would answer “yes” and further explain with IQ statistics, crime, or whatever else is relevant to your given context. Make them respond to you. Make them justify their beliefs. Remember, the truth is on our side, there is no need to play the comical villain.
Reply
2

Avid Fan
7 days ago
Yes, I think it was said tongue in cheek but also agree with not liking the word “racist” as it is an anti-white slur word. We’ve got to introduce our lexicon slowly to ‘normies’ – “racist”, “anti-white racism/ist”, then “anti-white”.
Reply
2
0

@larkascending
7 days ago
I understand there is a cultural difference but I think you’re conflating the crass, sort-of douchey bravado of Australians with masculinity. I don’t think being respectful and using more thoughtful, intentional language is inherently feminine, he is public speaking after all. Australia has many of the same problems as other countries with immigration, transgenderism, etc., so if it is indeed “still very masculine”, it’s not helping.
Reply
4
0
Hide replies

@GLiTCH
7 days ago
Your comment was ‘I don’t like his use of the term racist.’ Not that it was tactically mistaken, but that your feelings disagreed with it. You are kowtowing to the enemy’s use of word magic. If someone is a well spoken and presented person and describes themselves as ‘racist’ it breaks with the connotation of racists as dirty lowlife scum that has been created.
Reply
2
0
Hide replies

Avid Fan
7 days ago
Yes, ‘demystifying’ the word?
Reply
0
0

@larkascending
7 days ago(edited)
What even is a racist? It does not have a consistent, clear, useful definition. The dictionary definitions are all over the place and incoherent. How people use it is not consistent with the definitions either. My comment did articulate that it was tactically mistaken, as most people are dumb and will just take soundbites or clips out of context. I don’t think the use of the word was well thought out.
Reply
0

Evo
7 days ago
Are you not racist?
Being truthful is better than trying to play pretend with floury language to not offend the “normie”.
Reply
5
3
Hide replies

@larkascending
7 days ago(edited)
What is a racist? I like to be clear and coherent. The term doesn’t describe anything consistent or coherent. It’s just a term of abuse used by our enemies or anti-intellectuals.
Reply
3

Native Albion
7 days ago
I can see both sides of the argument. But if someone asks me in real life if I’m racist, I simply say yes to cut through the BS. Then I explain the history of the word racist and its anti-white meaning. I dont think you do yourself any favours by being defensive, you have to hold the ground and then be offensive, in the right way.
Reply
8
0
Hide replies

@Aus1788
7 days ago
Exactly! You just tell them that the suffix “ist’ in race is to show concern like; Pianist, Scientist. That you do have a priority of ingroup preference for your people, like one would for their own family and children.
Reply
2
0
Hide replies

@Aus1788
7 days ago
Family is your first priority, then neighborhood/community, then state, then nation, then the west. If everyone does their best to create a strong family for themselves then the rest will follow suit real fast! It’s a domino effect.
Reply
1
0

@larkascending
7 days ago
My argument is not to say “no”. My argument is the term, and others like it, isn’t coherent, accurate or useful. I don’t give any power or meaning to words that are solely designed to frame the debate in an anti-intellectual, immoral direction. The dictionaries can’t even agree on a definition for racist and people use the term in such wildly divergent ways.
Reply
1

The Belting Balaclava
7 days ago
I think the best strategy is to ask them to define it (which puts them on the defensive). Then answer truthfully. Most people who would explicitly ask you if you’re a racist are doing so in bad faith. Of course, when among friends, we call each other racist as a term of endearment. Context is everything.
Reply
3
0

@eddiesdreaming
5 days ago
but most people arent as intelligent as your good self, when talking to yhe masses usr words they think they understand and give those words new meaning new attachments , trust Joel on this .
Reply
1
0

@eddiesdreaming
5 days ago
the other tactic is to ask them to define the word , then when they have finished stumbling over their words and logic you can pick them apart.
Reply
0
0

@eddiesdreaming
5 days ago
just as enoch did in an interview when the interviewer usrd the word
Reply
0
1

Show 2 replies
\~^~/
2 days ago
Precisely. It’s a self sabotaging terminology if voluntarily used on yourself. It’s been designed as a shaming and silencing tool that doesn’t even require any logic.
Reply
0
0
very cool
7 days ago

Great speech and ideas. God bless.
Reply
4
0

Dawn Browning
7 days ago
He’s a good egg
Reply
4
0

Lampshade Denier
7 days ago
There once was a chad from down under,
Whose allegiance was never for wonder.
His speech was uplifting,
So the audience was gifting,
Applause that rolled out like thunder.
Reply
5
1

Avalon
7 days ago
Useful perspective
Reply
3
0

@LnD
7 days ago
Great as always, Joel.
Reply
3
0

@SmithJones
7 days ago
‘Once you see it you can’t un-see it’ This is 100% true. If it wasn’t i’d still be a Libertarian.
Reply
2
0

@TheAussieANZAC
5 days ago
Nice Stuff
Reply
1
0

@noreplacement
7 days ago
Yes, stop fretting about fine detail.
Reply
1
0
Western Critique
7 days ago

@Esau
good one
Reply
1
0

@popovacianen
7 days ago
i just cant get over the fact that hes in with fuentes and groyper fags
Reply
3
4
Hide replies

@jacobverbrugh
7 days ago
What are you doing for the movement?
Reply
7
0
Hide replies

@popovacianen
7 days ago
talking shit to retards on internet
Reply
0
1

@Aus1788
7 days ago
There’s a good pool of people we can syphon from in that group! They’re young and have a lot of growing to do, so don’t be disheartened. There’s potential and if anyone can initiate that, its us
Reply
9
0

@jacobverbrugh
7 days ago
Okay so you’re a bit of a groyper fag yourself?
Reply
0
0
Hide replies

@popovacianen
7 days ago
nah im not gay dude i dont defend brown pedofiles work with kikes or feds like fuentes and those fags lol
Reply
0
0

@eddiesdreaming
5 days ago
incredible speech it hard to say much more than that because Joel nailed it.
i wish we had him here permanently.
tbh though it feels like a large number of our people are already defeated , they will need to see many leaders and not just one at thr head of an organisation.
Reply

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 4,195

Total words in post = 6,259
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sat, Oct 28, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (52).

Patriotic Alternative – Laura Towler – The True Extremists – PA Northern Conference 2022 – Oct 29, 2022 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:56:39 +0000

[Deputy Leader of Patriotic Alternative; Laura spoke at PA’s Northern Conference 2022 about how nationalists are falsely portrayed by the anti-White establishment media as “extremist” for opposing our racial dispossession as the regime actively encourages the invasion of masses of non-Whites, both legal and illegal.

“The situation that we face in Britain is extreme! It’s a situation that the majority of Western nations face, and it’s the deliberate demographic replacement of the native population. So through government policy, not by accident, our share of the population is becoming smaller and smaller, and we’re on track to becoming a minority in our own country.”

— KATANA]

Patriotic Alternative

PA Northern Conference 2022

Laura Towler

The True Extremists

Oct 29, 2022

Click here for the video:

https://odysee.com/@PatrioticAlternative:f/LauraTowlerConference2022:1

Published on Nov 7, 2022

Odysee Description

Laura Towler: The True Extremists – PA Northern Conference 2022
November 7th, 2022
683 views

122
0
Support
Patriotic Alternative
@PatrioticAlternative
1,699 followers
Join
Follow
Read more about our sold-out national conference:
www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/pa_autumn_2022_conference
To support Patriotic Alternative:
www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donation
Get involved with Patriotic Alternative:
www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part
extremism; lauratowler; nationalism; politics; speech
URL
lbry://@PatrioticAlternative#f/LauraTowlerConference2022#1
Claim ID
1b79a1dd7d8267dbe590419c9f6d39d1c087c01b
288.28 MB

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(23:09 mins)

Kenny Smith: Our first speaker is a formidable lady! She’s intelligent! She’s articulate! She’s determined! And she’s brave! People think that she’s actually the soft side of the leadership. But those of us who work with her know that’s not quite true. Probably nobody more so than her husband. [chuckling]

But what people maybe don’t realize is Laura has come out of her comfort zone to do the things she does for the movement, because she has that understanding and that desire to make change happen.

Please can you put your hand together for Laura Towler, the Deputy Leader!

[applause]

Laura Towler: Thank you very much. Okay, so today I’m going to be talking about extremism, but perhaps not from the angle that you might expect. I am a nationalist, and right now I’m stood in front of 150 other nationalists. I don’t need to explain why nationalism is not extreme, because everybody in this room already knows that. Nationalism is simply a love of your people, your nation. And when I say my people, I’m talking about British people, and White people.

Although our enemies will try to suggest that because we love our race, we must hate everybody else, this is not true. Other racial groups do not inform my beliefs at all. I wish them all well, but they’re not a key part of my ideology.

As a nationalist. I want what’s best for my people. I want us to have a homeland where we can be safe and away from harm and conflict. I want us to be able to protect the most vulnerable people in our homeland. So babies, children, elderly people, etc. I want us to be able to prosper as a people, and I want us to be able to be proud of who we are. And I want us to be able to govern ourselves and have self-determination. I want us to be able to decide our own future. Those are my beliefs as a nationalist, and I make no apologies for those.

It’s worth noting here that the majority of non-White countries around the world are nationalists in nature, and they’re allowed to be! It’s only in White countries where the “N” word, “nationalist” is a naughty word. If you were to say to me:

“But Britain did some bad things historically.”

My response would be:

“I don’t care!”

This is not some bargaining game. You’re not going to throw some historical event at me, and then I’m going to say:

“Okay, I guess it’s fine to demographically replace my people then!”

It doesn’t work like that. Nationalists love and protect their own. No apologies, no compromise, no concessions!

So I said at the start, I’m going to talk about extremism, but perhaps not from the angle that you might expect. I’m not going to spend the majority of this talk defending nationalism and explaining why it isn’t extreme. I’m also not going to try to convince the listener why we at Patriotic Alternative are good people. We have morality on our side. So why would we feel the need to defend ourselves against somebody else’s value system? Your misconceptions fall on you, not on us.

Today, instead, I’m going on the offensive. I’m going to demonstrate that it isn’t us, nationalists, and patriots, that you should be worried about when it comes to extremism. It’s our enemies! In fact, not only should you not be worried about us, but you should be thanking us. This speech is dedicated to all of our family members and friends who do not understand why we do what we do. So let’s begin.

The situation that we face in Britain is extreme! It’s a situation that the majority of Western nations face, and it’s the deliberate demographic replacement of the native population. So through government policy, not by accident, our share of the population is becoming smaller and smaller, and we’re on track to becoming a minority in our own country. If this was to happen to a non-White country, then the system would not deny that it was happening. And they’d, in fact, label it “extreme”. And they’d promote intervention to stop it!

So, for example, let’s take Tibet. Free Tibet is a nonprofit NGO and they say on our website that they, this is a, quote:

“Advocate for a free Tibet in which Tibetans are able to determine their own future, because Tibet’s religion has been extinguished and it’s culture and language erased.”

End quote. This is a bad thing? Of course it’s a bad thing! And campaigns from organizations like Free Tibet include things like fighting against censorship, campaigning for the political freedoms of dissidents, and stopping indoctrination taking place in schools. Sound familiar?

Now, Free Tibet is a non-governmental organization and I can’t find any evidence of it being funded by the British state, although I can find evidence of it being funded by the United States. However, what I’m trying to illustrate here – bear with me on this one – but the Dalai Lama and Mark Collect are not that different. [chuckling] Yet they’re treated very differently. In fact, the only time that I’ve ever heard His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, criticized was when he said something positive about White people:

“Europe belongs to the Europeans.”

Another example of the double standard is – this is a bit of a mouthful – the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of anti-semitism. So our government have adopted this definition of anti-semitism. It states that:

“It is anti-semitic to deny the Jewish people their right to self-determination.”

What about the right of the British to our self-determination? When it comes to White ethnic groups, our replacement, and our inability to keep ourselves safe and determine our future is denied. Or we’re met with the usual line of:

“Why does it matter if you become a minority, anyway?”

People who say this intrinsically know that it’s wrong, that the panda is going to become extinct. But White people being on the same trajectory, who cares? They take offence at even bringing it up.

As Britain becomes more multicultural, predictable problems transpire. Violent crime increases. Young White girls are preyed upon, statues are torn down, and street names are changed. Black figureheads demand more and more, the more that we give to them! Whether that’s black politicians standing up in the House of Commons demanding reparations, or black celebrities demanding over-representations in diversity quotas for basically everything that we have to look at and listen to.

And censorship increases. In fact, “diversity” is such a “strength” that they have to create Hate Speech laws to stop everybody from criticizing each other!

Enoch Powell mentioned in his 1968 famous Rivers of Blood speech, that he received a letter from an elderly woman in Wolverhampton who said that she was the last White resident on her street. And people didn’t believe him. People called him a liar. Would anybody today deny that these streets exist? From London to Leicester, Bradford to Luton, Birmingham to Slough.

[07:42]

Our people have no future under the current system. So what options do we have to change this? We’re not going to vote our way out of this, by playing part in the first past the post, two party, system, because both big parties are heading in the same direction. And I was speaking to Mark, our resident baker from PA Yorkshire, a few days ago, I hope he doesn’t mind me quoting him, he is here today. But we were having a conversation about how at least the Labour Party are honest with what they want. And Mark said, he said a quote which I thought was very clever:

“Labour will punch you in the face, but the Tories will stab you in the back!”

He’s absolutely right! We’re not going to fix anything by voting for one of the two big parties. So what other options do we have? Well, we could start our own party, if the Electoral Commission decides to let us through and they continue to decline Patriotic Alternative on incredibly trivial things that they’ve let other parties through with.

So what else can people do if they disagree with the current order? Well, of course we’re taking action at Patriotic Alternative. And we cannot underestimate the small victories that we’re beginning to see along the way. And Kenny mentioned a lot of them in his opening introduction. I’m confident that more victories will follow as well.

But despite the fact that we only advocate for peaceful community building and activism, we are labelled “extremists” by the State and the media! There’s not one example of anybody associated with PA ever advocating for violence. And there’s actually hundreds, maybe thousands of examples of us disavowing violence.

But the truth doesn’t matter! We have mass support, but we aggravate the current order, therefore we must be stopped. The system does everything they can to stop patriotic British people from changing the things that we want to change, from lying about us within the press, from counter-terrorism raiding the homes of good people on spurious charges, looking for a piece of evidence that they might use to misrepresent us in court. To working with far-Left activist groups like the shamed organization and known liars, Hope Not Hate.

So I mentioned three arms of the system, then. The media, counter-terrorism, and Hope Not Hate. The media don’t report on nationalists honestly. I don’t need to convince you of this. We all know this. They ignore the vast majority of what we do, things like homeless outreach, and they lie about us, and they misrepresent our belief.

I have a prominent position within Patriotic Alternative. I’m the Deputy Leader, but they tend to just skip over me, and not really talk about me at all. And I honestly believe that it’s because they can’t paint me in a bad light. I might get the odd sentence about how my name is really Laura Tyree-Towler-Yacksley-Lennon or something! [chuckling] And I once had an argument with Yorkshire Tea. But they tend to just skip over me.

The media has two caricatures of nationalists: Stupid and evil. And if they can’t paint you as stupid, which they can’t do with Patriotic Alternative, they paint us as evil instead.

Make no mistake that the British media is not on the side of the British public. There’s no Right-wing mainstream media in Britain. We have the illusion of one, with newspapers like the Daily Mail. But the Daily Mail will report on rape gangs one day and then call those who want to do something about it racist the next. There’s no variety of opinions in the mainstream media, not for the important topics, anyway. Think about the narratives we saw for George Floyd Covid 19 vaccines, Russia versus Ukraine. It’s the same stories churned out again and again.

We recently held a successful conference in Scotland, and I attended, and while we were there, we were chatting with the venue and the guests about our beliefs, and they were interested, and most of them supported what we said. Nobody was offended or aggravated by anything that we do. The Daily Record reported on our event. And they said that:

“The venue and the guests were horrified that we’d been there!”

Who was horrified? Nobody was horrified! And when the Record tweeted out their article, they got two likes on their tweet. This is one of the biggest newspapers in Scotland. They have 145,000 followers on Twitter. Two likes! And one of our guys responded to that tweet from a very small Twitter account, which is now suspended, and he got 200 likes! And those likes weren’t us because we’re all suspended from Twitter. [chuckling] But we see these ratios again, and again, and again, and again! And I’m trying to demonstrate that the media do not have the support of the public, yet we do.

Interestingly, a couple of days ago, we received an apology from the Daily Record. I’m not sure if you guys saw it on Telegram. But they’d published an article and they’d quoted Sam as saying that he wanted to, so these are Sam’s words apparently:

“I want to pursue a Nazi inspired anti-semitic agenda!”

[laughing] Did you say that, Sam? [loud laughter and applause] And Sam had also allegedly said that he wanted to:

“Gas jews.”

End quote. Now, we sometimes laugh about these articles because it’s ridiculous, isn’t it? Who says:

“I want to pursue a Nazi inspired, how do you do, fellow nationalists, …!”

But in all all seriousness, Sam hadn’t said any of those things, and the media just lied about it! So we complained about it and they got back to us. And surprisingly, they apologized to us! And they said:

“We are unable to demonstrate that any of these claims are correct.”

Why did you print it then? Did you just make it up? Or did a source come to you and say it and you just thought:

“Yeah, we’ll print that! We don’t need any evidence!”

This is who the media are. This is what they do! They lie about innocent people. Anybody who counters the narrative, they will attack you. Isn’t this extremism, defaming and vilifying good people?

[13:35]

Now, I also mentioned Counter Terrorism as well. We know that the vast majority of people who were killed in terror attacks, in Britain, are killed by Muslims. It’s something like 98%, 99%. But Counter Terrorism and their friends in the media want to put it in the narrative that White patriotic people are the biggest terror threats. So they arrest people, they charge people, and they convict people for “terrorism”. And when I say “terrorism”, I mean owning books, or posting something online. And it’s because their yearly report at the end of the year can then say:

“White Right-wing, terrorism is a big issue.”

How many lives are Counter Terrorism putting at risk by focusing their attention on people who are not likely to commit violence? How many terror attacks could we prevent if Prevent actually focused on preventing violence instead of people with the wrong opinions?

That bomb at Liverpool Woman’s Hospital, it didn’t go off last time, but next time that bomb might go off. Those babies and those mothers might not be so lucky. And if that happens, then the burden of that lies on the state. It lies on Counter Terrorism. It lies on organizations like Prevent.

And just a thought, by the way. If owning certain books is illegal, then why don’t they tell us what these books are? Or why don’t they ban them if they’re so dangerous? But we all know the answer to that.

So we’ve touched on the extremism of the media have and Counter Terrorism. Now let’s come briefly to Hope Not Hate. Hope Not Hate are an anti-White, far-Left activist group who have just been exposed as being an organization who pays sources and bribes people for information. They have no organic support from the public! And they have no engagement on social media! They have over 100,00 “followers” on Twitter, and they’re lucky at if they get a couple of likes on a tweet.

They also have a YouTube channel, which I didn’t even know about. They’ve had it for almost a decade, and it has 1, 700 subs. Despite having the backing and the funding of the entire system, they usually get a couple of hundred views on a video, and for all of their videos, comments are turned off. They did actually have likes and dislikes turned off as well. And then YouTube did them a favour by banning dislikes, so they’ve got them back on now.

But despite mentioning earlier that the majority of violence is carried out by Islam, Hope Not Hate don’t focus on that extremism at all. And they also don’t focus on the extremism of the far-Left, who regularly use threats and violence to intimidate their political opponents. They’ve tried to do it today. Hope Not Hate only focus on the so-called far-Right. Hope Not Hate are extremists!

This year, they shared a tweet celebrating throwing tomatoes full of razor blades at their political opponents. They’ve celebrated people on the Right being physically attacked. They’ve tweeted out the location of dissidents before, and then violence has followed because of their doxing, such as with Generation Identity at Seven [word unclear].

[16:36]

In fact, Matthew Collins, Hope Not Hate’s head of Intelligence, … I know, ..! [chuckling] Matthew Collins who looks less like Stephen Graham and more like Mr. Tumble. There are posts online of him admitting to being a member of the Communist Party. Communism, as we know, is an incredibly deadly and dangerous ideology.

Now, I mentioned my husband Sam earlier and hoped not. Here to lie about Sam a lot. He’s one of their favourite people. And they always say, you will have seen it. They always try to say that Sam used to be a member of National Action. They passed this information over to Counter Terrorism with the intention of trying to destroy Sam’s life.

Sam has never been part of National Action. He attended a march a number of years ago against rape gangs, and he stood at the back. If, you know, Sam, you know, he’s always late! [chuckling] He stood at the back and he was photographed allegedly with some National Action people stood in front of them. So Hope Not Hate keeps saying:

“Part of NA! Part of NA! You need to arrest him! You need to send him to prison!

Let me put this to bed right now. Do, you know how I feel when I see that photograph of Sam that Hope Not Hate keep circulating? Do I feel ashamed? Do I feel embarrassed? Do I want to hide it? No! I feel proud that my husband stood up and marched against the sexual exploitation of children.

[loud applause]

So keep sharing it! Because we know the truth. And every time I see that photo, it reminds me of why I’m married him.

[18:18]

Hope Not Hate lies, and their attempts to destroy lives is extremism!

So I come to my conclusion. I’ve spoken today about how the situation that we’re faced with in Britain is extreme. Reducing people to a minority status in their own country is extreme! Giving them no option to resist this is extreme! Not only is what they’re doing to our people extreme, but they give us no healthy outlets to prevent this. We’re expected to put up and shut up! We’re not even allowed to say:

“White Lives Matter!”

It’s racist! It’s a White supremacist phrase. I’m quoting the media here.

I’d like to ask a question. How many people in here have heard the phrase:

“When black people are talking, you shut up and listen?”

Has anyone heard it? It seems to be more prevalent. Yes, it’s something that I’m hearing more and more recently. Black people are the only people who are qualified to talk about issues such as race, and racism, and oppression, and colonialism. And when they’re kind enough to teach us about it, we shouldn’t question them. We should shut up and listen and take notes.

Well, let me tell you something. White people do not need permission from black people, or anybody else for that matter, to speak! We don’t need you to tell us our opinions because we’re capable of forming our own opinions. We can look at the information, assess it, then decide whatever we want. And if we want to talk about race, or racism, or colonialism, we will!

Is there any wonder that our people are beginning to feel a little bit fed up, a little bit trapped, a little bit backed into a corner? Is there any wonder that our people are angry? We have the actions of our government towards us, and then the inability of our people to enact change. What are we supposed to do? They’re poking our people with a stick and saying:

“You’re going to lose everything that matters to you! And there’s nothing you can do about it!”

And this is why they should be thanking us at Patriotic Alternative, because we give people a positive outlet to channel their frustration. Things may be bad, but join our organization, and start fighting back! Start implementing change. Get out into your community and make things better for your people. I’ve seen young, shy, lads appear angry and frustrated at how things are, join us. And then within twelve months they’re completely different people. They’re confident! They’re directing their energy into something positive! They have hope!

Never have the system’s illusion of strength been as weak as it is today. Never have the British public had less faith in the establishment. Do, you know, that we’ve had five prime ministers in six years? Nobody can honestly say that they still have faith in this system. They keep telling us that “Diversity is Our Strength”. While every diversity project fails. Footballers miss their penalties [chuckling]. Royals emigrate, and give up their duties. Another movie trailer with likes, and dislikes, and comments turned off on YouTube. And plucky, and enthusiastic government reports, until the results become apparent. And then it’s:

“Err! Publishing that is not in the public’s interest.”

And of course the most diverse cabinet in British history that only lasted a month! Nationalists just can’t help being proven right.

Boris Johnson promised to cut immigration, and White working class voters, especially in the north, held their nose and voted for his party. Well, the Tories don’t have their support anymore. Labour are winning in the polls, and Labour’s anti-Whiteness is much more transparent. People don’t want to vote Labour. These polls are a good thing. People no longer see the Conservatives as the party who want to reduce immigration. They no longer see them as the least worst of the two big parties.

And all of this is great for us. The time has come for a real alternative. A modern, radical movement that unashamedly, and unapologetically, puts our people first!

To our family members and friends who do not understand why we do this, and to those who want us to stop, I hope my speech today has cleared a few things up. But ultimately you’re asking us to stop caring about the future of our children. You might be able to put your fingers in your ears and your hands over your eyes, but thank God that we’re not! Because despite your actions towards us, we’re looking out for you too.

They say it’s always darkest before dawn. Well, let’s not sit around watching the clock and waiting for the sun to come up. Play your part. Embrace the struggle, and become the new dawn! We are Patriotic Alternative. Join us and take a stand against the Great Replacement of our people. Thank you.

[loud and long applause]

[23:36]

END

top

============================================

ODYSEE COMMENTS

top
6 Comments

(As of Nov 18, 2022)

@MichaelB
10 days ago
Keep growing Patriotic Alternative!!
Log in to reply
14
0

@WhiteLightKnight
9 days ago

@LauraTowler
What an fantastic speech. The ending is so inspiring, thank you.
Log in to reply
8
0

@FoxFourteen
10 days ago
Thank you for saying British people and White people as there are many people that live in the UK that are British/European descendants from the Anglosphere. Although there are many leftists from this group, there are also others who understand this struggle and the nightmare our Folk are being corralled into.
Log in to reply
9
1

@RoadRunner
9 days ago
Absolutely storming speech. Perfectly placed at the start, very well thought out and planned, and perfect for sharing with just about anyone. Laura is the best draw for any nationalist organisation that I can think of, and a priceless figurehead for PA. Without doubt, it is Laura’s presence that quells the anxiety of the newcomer and ensures that those who get involved keep their feet firmly on the ground. Thank you for dedicating your life to us and all that it entails.
Log in to reply
7
0

@tweetybird
3 days ago
Thanks for this Laura.
John in Switzerland
Log in to reply
1
0

@Alternative_Voices_Portal
2 days ago
Indeed, the most noble cause you can take up these days is to work against the main evil of our age: Antiwhitism.
It’s antiwhites who need to defend their sick ideas – not us.
Log in to reply
0
0

============================================

PDF Download

top

Transcript Total words = 3,881
Blog Post Total words = 4,384
Total images = xxx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Nov 18, 2022 — Published post. Transcript complete.

Conference Speech – katana17

Joel Davis – The Goonright Pipeline – with Mark Collett – Aug 6, 2025 – Transcript

Joel Davis

The Goonright Pipeline

with Mark Collett

Wed, Aug 6, 2025

Description

Following Transcript Quality = 5 Stars

TRANSCRIPT

CONTENTS

01 Introducing Special Guest Mark Collett from Patriotic Alternative, UK

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

04 No Right to Remain Silent

“I don’t want to say a word until my solicitor gets here.”

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

“You know, can you explain this?”

“Well look, I can.”

“What’s he gonna say?”

“Well, I was in my mid-30s, I was going through a bit of a dry patch with relationships. And then it’s extremely hot but extremely crazy girl approached me and you, …”

“You know what it’s like when you get the hot crazy thing. You just dive straight in! And it’s an amazing ride, but it’s like a roller coaster. One minute it’s up, one minute it’s down!”

“You’re not going to laugh. You stop, Stop! This is meant to be serious!”

“Oh, you don’t need this to explain this one to me!”

“But then she moves in and it gets even crazy and you can’t handle it. And, oh, my God!”

“Say no more!”

“Would you like a coffee? Would you like water? No food, but just coffee and water.”

“No, thanks. I don’t drink coffee.”

“Look, I’m gonna sit here and wait.”

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

“I’m a threat to public order, a threat to the fundamental fabric of society, and a threat to the values on which Sweden and the EU were built!”

“Oh, my God!”

“Look, this is getting serious!”

“No, put the phone down, you’re not allowed to touch your phone.”

“Oh, God!”

“Well, the signature might be worth something one day, so here you go.”

“Have I got anything left to say?”

“No.”

“Look you are going to be taken out of Sweden now.”

“Well, what’s going to happen?”

“Well, we’ll book you on a plane or you can you could always book yourself on one.”

“Well, I can’t book myself on one because I haven’t got a passport and I can’t board anything because I haven’t got a passport and I don’t know where my luggage is.”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

“Look, this is a dangerous guy!”

“Why has the police got this one guy? Why is he being sat near the front of the plane?”

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

“This is all going in the right direction. We got somebody on YouTube again, like Mark, who’s going to speak our language. I can watch that. It feels good. Somebody’s regurgitating points that I would make myself. I can listen to him and I feel like somebody’s speaking for me.”

“I want to be more than a content creator. I want to organise in the real world. I want people to get out there to protest, to demonstrate. To organise, to be involved in legal advocacy, to be involved in activism.”

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

“Based on all of the factual evidence presented, this is a undemocratic and disproportionate punishment for somebody who has never committed a crime and was not intending to commit a crime.”

“Well, it might hurt your feeling, it might impact your family, it might affect your ability to take your children on holiday.”

“Well you can’t deprive that child of his dad. You can’t!”

“I’m really fond of the food in the UK. And it would damage my digestive system if I had to go back to my native country and eat the slop they serve. So, oh, well, we better let him stay then. He likes the food!”

“You know, save Mark Collett!”

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

“Mate, what’s going wrong?”

“Oi, Tommy! You’re racist bastard!”

“Hey, perfect. Good idea, Tommy. That’s the perfect thing we need. Let’s start the fundraisers to free Tommy from legal consequence for his, … Improvised. Good man!”

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

“Oh, well, they were deporting a Muslim as well!”

“Oh, man, I don’t need this as well.”

“Oh, I’m all cold!”

“I’m cold. Give me your Hoodie.”

“Yeah, you’re not having my Hoodie.”

“I’m gonna be cold!”

“Yeah, but if I give it to you, then I’m gonna be cold as well. It’s like, if I had two Hoodies, you know, I’d consider it. But I only have one Hoodie and it’s for me.”

“Oh, my phone charger’s not working.”

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

“Can you fix my phone charger?”

“I can’t believe this!”

“What if they don’t let you come home? What are we gonna do?”

“What if they detain you at Manchester for 48 hours? How are we gonna deal with this?”

“Hi, you trapped!”

“Hi, mate, how you doing?”

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

“Oh, well, we might make you pay for your own flight back.”

“Oh, God!”

“Unless you shut this down, unless you target the main figureheads for this community, this thing is going to become huge! This thing is going to get out of control. Everyone’s going to vote for these guys and this is going to be the next big political thing.”