Greg Johnson: I’m Greg Johnson. Welcome to Counter-Currents Radio. Today’s guest is Joel Davis. Joel, welcome.

 

Joel Davis: Hey, how you going? Nice to be here.

 

Greg Johnson: Joel is joining us from the future. It is, I believe, Sunday where you are in Australia, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yes, Sunday morning. Yeah.

 

Greg Johnson: Okay.

 

Well, I want to talk to you about your recent debate in the form of two articles. One from Keith Woods responding to you, and then your rejoinder to Keith on the NS question; does nationalism today need National Socialism?

 

And I just want to read a Telegram post that was quoted by Keith. This is you. And this is what he was responding for. You write:

 

“There was a long time when I at least partially concealed my National Socialist sympathies and tried to pursue ideological projects which could circumvent the negative stigma. I realised these paths wouldn’t work because they all required rhetorical and often actual compromises upon racial loyalism. At the core of the pathologisation of White nationalism is its association with the spectre of National Socialism as unique and ultimate evil. It’s simply not possible to avoid this association in good faith with without damaging the conviction of your own position. The only solution to this, if you want the White race to survive, is the rehabilitation of National Socialism. There is no other solution. Stop wasting time.”

 

And Keith responded with an article on his Substack where he raises a number of points.

 

And I thought what we could do is we could talk through some of his main points and that’ll give you a chance to expand upon your counter arguments. So let’s just begin.

 

Joel Davis: I also mention for the audience that I also wrote an essay of my own which was in response to Keith. But the essay was largely an essay in its own right, where I thought instead of just writing an essay, just responding to his arguments, I’d rather actually formulate my position on its own basis and then deal with some of his arguments at the end on the basis of what I laid out. So my essay is also out there if anyone is interested in reading that. But yeah, anyway, we can go, …

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, and I linked both it and Keith’s piece at Counter-Currents in the show announcement, and I’m sure it will be linked presently in the actual comments by our able moderator. So everybody should, of course, familiarize himself out there with both pieces.

 

So the main argument that Keith makes is that, well, there are four arguments that I can discern here. And I wanted to talk to you about this because I’m sympathetic actually, with Keith’s position on this and that I’ve laid out essentially this position myself over the years. There’s an article I wrote on The Relevance of the Old Right, which is a chapter in the White Nationalist Manifesto, for instance, on this topic.

 

So the first point that he makes is:

 

“That if we’re going to have racial nationalism today, ethnic nationalism today, that National Socialism isn’t all that relevant to it because National Socialism really wasn’t a pan-White nationalist position, it was a German nationalist and Chauvinist position. And that the National Socialists sought to aggrandize Germany at the expense of other White societies, principally Poland and Ukraine and Russia. And therefore if we’re really looking for White nationalism and that means self-determination for all White nations, it just doesn’t do to look at German National Socialism. How are you going to really advocate that as a solution for say, the problems of Poland? Are you even going to get a hearing for that?”

 

So I’m sympathetic with that and I’d just like to talk about your response to that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so I mean, first of all, obviously I’m an Australian and I was speaking from a more Anglo spherical context at the very least. If I was Polish, I don’t think I’d be advocating for adopting something as explicit as what I adopt in my activities here in Australia in regards to National Socialism.

 

But nevertheless the stigma and the kind of the entire ideological paradigm, the way that liberalism has been reshaped in the post World War II international order still affects Poland and Ukraine in ways that are kind of suppressing their ability to express nationalism as well.

 

Because at the end of the day they are within the American led international order. They’re within the Liberal world order, so to speak. They’re within a European order of liberal democracies which fundamentally base their conception upon a rejection of National Socialism and its tenets. And that extends beyond anything specific to National Socialism which you could differentiate from broader ethno-nationalism. It actually, the ethno-nationalist aspect of National Socialism is obviously itself has become stigmatized as a result of this association. So there still needs to be work done in a rehabilitation of National Socialism. Even if you aren’t going to adopt National Socialism as a full on ideological doctrine in Poland or in Ukraine or in Russia. There are actually pretty large National Socialist movements in Ukraine and Russia. They probably have some of the largest National Socialist movements in the kind of contemporary world, which is kind of ironic for Keith’s position or perhaps even your position.

 

But it’s not ironic from my point of view because you can see how if you were to view the Soviet Union as the bad guy of the story, well then that kind of changes and relativises how you would conceive of National Socialism from a Ukrainian perspective, for example.

 

[07:17]

 

And of course, as you know, World War II went on, the rhetoric of Hitler and Goebbels and so on became increasingly more pan-European. The SS became increasingly a pan-European force. By the end of the war, the majority of the SS weren’t even German citizens. Many Slavic peoples from many of these nations, nations joined the SS and also many of these Slavic nations actually became allies of the Third Reich. And the rhetoric became increasingly about a battle to save Europe from Bolshevism and the idea that German leadership of Europe would be fundamentally better for Eastern European peoples, not just simply better for Germans. Now that probably isn’t an argument that’s going to appeal to the Polish specifically because of the unique circumstances there.

 

But nevertheless it is an argument that obviously appeals to a lot of people from Eastern Europe because a lot of Eastern European nations literally allied with the Reich, allied with it against the Soviets and sympathize with it up to this day. I’ve met a lot of people from the Baltic States, for example, who are very, they seem to have very strong NS movements in those countries, for example, and different attitudes towards National Socialism in those countries than a lot of other countries because of their visceral hatred of the Soviet Union and the view of the National Socialists as attempting to basically save their countries from the Soviet Union. So you know, and obviously you’ve got phenomena like the Azov Battalion and so on.

 

You know, I think this idea that National Socialism just can’t fly with Slavic peoples and therefore we need to get rid of it so that we don’t offend them to embrace White unity. I just don’t think that actually makes sense historically and it doesn’t explain all these phenomena I just mentioned. And additionally, the National Socialist movement, insofar as it exists today around the world, is fundamentally pan-European is in its orientation it is kind of spread across all White countries and it is clearly focused on race first and foremost more than any like particular kind of nationalism. Although the respective National Socialists of different countries obviously are nationalists with respect to their own ethnic group at the same time there is a recognition that our race has a shared destiny and that it isn’t just the story of any one particular nation, but it’s the story of the race and the civilisation at large, which is pertinent here in political and historical terms.

 

And additionally a point that I made in my essay was that I’m not even going to, I mean, I didn’t necessarily agree with the characterisation that Keith made. I think he cherry picked a little bit because there are counter examples of statements from, for example, Alfred Rosenberg, who was in charge of the Eastern Front, which were sympathetic and made concrete plans towards creating, for example, a post-war Ukrainian nation in the event of German victory and so on.

 

This idea that they were just going to roll in there and genocide the Slavs is a bit of a meme, a bit of a construction of post World War II propaganda. Like General Plan Ost, for example, in my opinion is a fabrication. But I didn’t want to get bogged down in these historical arguments because the most core and fundamental argument, which I think and most relevant argument, because I mean, there was anti-Slavic attitudes in Germany and there was mistreatment in the war. That’s just a fact. So nevertheless, the more pertinent argument is that what concretely was World War II about? What it concretely was about was who was going to lead Europe, who was going to run Europe.

 

And basically what happened was that Europe was divided on the one side to American influence, on the other side to Soviet influence. And it’s clearly been a disaster for our race. Europe under American or Russian or Soviet rule is far worse off than a Europe under German rule, particularly under the rule of a Germany that was embodying the values of National Socialism and therefore of racialism in probably its most extreme possible form. There would simply not have been the tolerance of racial aliens on the European continent under German rule, just simply wouldn’t have been tolerated.

 

In fact, the jews probably would have been expelled from Europe had the Germans won in almost in entirety. So Europe would have become racially purified under German rule. I think that is completely, that’s pretty uncontroversial statement to make.

 

Whereas effectively under American rule or under Soviet rule, I mean, under the Soviet rule, it actually more or less fared better from a kind of just purely racial stance. But you know, as the phrase goes, you know:

 

“Communism rots the body, but liberalism rots the soul.”

 

The development of Western liberalism in the post World War II time period has been the most horrible thing to ever happen to Europe in its entire history! American rule over Europe, which is now almost total, has basically led to a situation in which there’s a kind of like a kind of a mass suicide occurring due to state sponsored, like American State sponsored subversion of institutions, projects of de-Nazification, etc, the necessity for the Americans to in their view to compete with the Kremlin aligned Left in Europe, in Western Europe by basically funding into existence an even more destructive form of Leftism which conservatives call “Cultural Marxism” or whatever. And you can debate whether that’s a legitimate phrase. But we all know what we mean by that. I mean that’s just objectively what happened.

 

[13:19]

 

So the Germans were fighting for a Europe that would be under their control. And yes, that would mean for them to assert their control. You know, you can’t make an omelette without cracking some eggs. That’s just the reality of war. Like in order for Germany to become strong enough to rule Europe, it needed to expand from its shrunken borders after the First World War. It needed to basically become strong enough to compete with rising superpowers to the East and West, namely the US and the USSR. That required a degree of expansion. That’s what the geopolitical logic was in when it came to that. And it also required a kind of you could say an imperialism. It required, you know, Germany asserting itself over the continent writ large as opposed to just simply bunkering down in Germany and saying:

 

“Well, you know what’s going on in the rest of Europe isn’t our business, we’re just going to focus on Germany.”

 

Well, the reality is that would be naive because the Soviet Union had expansionist designs, that can’t be denied. And they demonstrated it very clearly. And there was ambitions in the American elite to use their influence to basically reshape the entire global international order. So you know, these were powers that were universalist in nature that had larger ambitions than simply being concerned with themselves.

 

So in order to confront these twin threats, the Germans had to figure out a foreign policy and had to figure out an orientation that would enable them to compete for basically European domination. There was no other state in Europe that was capable of taking on that responsibility other than the Germans.

 

So to me, when I look at this in a kind of realistic way, and then also pair that to the fact that for me, German National Socialism wasn’t just like some aberration of the 1920s, but was instead a concrete manifestation of a far deeper historical process whereby the German nation rejected many core elements of the Enlightenment. And that gripped obviously the Anglo-American and French world. To me, the Germans were simply asserting a different form of consciousness, a European particularism and obviously a racial particularism against the encroachment of universalist political projects that now due to their success, are literally threatening the very survival of our race and have reduced Europe to its weakest position perhaps ever! At least in recent centuries.

 

So I think when you take that into consideration holistically, it becomes a lot easier to sympathize with the Germans. And I’ve got nothing against Polish people or against Slavic people. And I even said in my essay, you know, developments in racial science have shown that so-called Slavic peoples, and that’s a bad determination because Slavic is a language group, that kind of groups together people that it can be quite genetically different.

 

But you know, Eastern Europe, northern Eastern European, like the kind of northeast of Europe, people native to that area are actually incredibly genetically similar to people from northwestern Europe and far more similar than either of them are to people from southern Europe actually. And particularly Polish people and German people, they’re actually very genetically similar.

 

So the racialist science of the 19th century, that wasn’t informed by genetics in the same way that contemporary racialist science I think exaggerated these distinctions.

 

But you know, even in Chamberlain, I remember reading in Chamberlain in Foundations of the 19th Century, which is obviously foundational proto-National Socialist text, very influential, you know, he saw the Slavic people as a branch of the Aryan race. It wasn’t that they rejected that the Slavic people were not White or not Aryan. They were just a different branch in the Nordic branch from his perspective.

 

So it wasn’t as though the prevailing thought in Germany was that the Slavic peoples were basically non-Whites or subhuman or something. Maybe there were some comments you could cherry pick, but you could also find comments to the alternative. But the point is that now we have a far more informed understanding and we can say:

 

“Well, actually we’re not that different from people from native to Poland or Russia, like the actual, you know, Russ, or you know, people from the Baltic states or whatever, particularly these places.”

 

And so we can be informed by science from a racialist perspective, you know, seeking greater Unity amongst our peoples and hopefully overcoming these historical differences through time.

 

Greg Johnson: That’s all well and good. The next question I have, and this is relevant. So I want to say it now while it’s still relevant, is why couldn’t you say from a very similar perspective, like if you took Frank Salter very seriously, his book On Genetic Interests, which is a very good case for nationalism, you can make a very strong argument for universal nationalism from his work and you can make a very strong argument for a certain amount of solidarity amongst White national nations and from that point of view. And I’ve heard this argument offered by a scientist I know who’s very into our stuff. His attitude as well, from the point of view of this kind of Saltarian politics. We just have to look at German National Socialism and other forms of 20th century and 19th century national Chauvinism and just say well that’s the bad old form of nationalism. The good form of nationalism today rejects that kind of Chauvinism and is things in terms of pan-racial interest.

 

I remember when I was getting into all of this got a quarter of a century ago, it’s been a long time. My background is in philosophy. I’m very interested in political philosophy and I was very interested in nationalism. I was interested in the case for nationalism and I was in conversations with a lot of people when I first sort of got into the White nationalist movement circles. I’m the first White nationalist thing I ever attended was a David Irving talk in Atlanta!

 

[20:10]

 

And of course it was about World War II. And after I filled the first shelf with David Irving books and then a second shelf with other related books that people kept saying:

 

“Well, you got to read this, you got to read that.”

 

I started thinking, you know:

 

“It doesn’t seem logically necessary from a philosophical point of view that the case for nationalism stands or form falls on debates about mid 20th century history, because history and philosophy are very different things.”

 

Now I don’t want to argue that philosophy is entirely a priori or deductive or anything like that, but philosophy should be able to make cases for things like the best sort of political system for European man or man in general, without having to get off into the weeds about again mid 20th century history and specifically the rehabilitation of National Socialism on charges of being imperialistic and totalitarian. You can throw in the Holocaust and that entire branch of literature that’s connected with that, the revisionist literature on Holocaust. But more broadly, revisionism about the war, about the regime and so forth. I get why people are interested in that, but logically it strikes me that you can argue for ethnic nationalism based simply on a philosophical argument. And you could also argue for ethnic nationalism based on something like Frank Salter’s theory of ethnic genetic interest.

 

So where does the actual mid 20th century history come into this? And why do you maintain that we’ve got to rehabilitate the tarnished, stigmatized reputation of National Socialism?

 

Joel Davis: The argument that I made in my essay, you’ll notice it didn’t really have anything to do with refuting the Holocaust or any of these. And I am a revisionist on a lot of these subjects, but it wasn’t actually based in relitigating the Second World War, and was the Allied atrocity propaganda, legitimate or not? And all of this kind of stuff.

 

My argument was a dialectical argument. The core of my argument, I should say it basically had three main points. Point one is that National Socialism is the purification of the nationalist idea. That the nationalist idea has been kind of mixed up with many other ideological ideas historically. And this is particularly true when it comes to the relationship between nationalism and liberalism. You know, from the late 18th century into the early 20th century. Often they came as a package deal. Now that isn’t always the case. There are other examples. But often they came as a package deal. And so like for example, the refrain that I get as an Australian is:

 

“Why don’t you look back to the Australian nationalist tradition that created the White Australia Policy and set up the Federation of Australia and so on and created a White ethno-state in Australia?”

 

And obviously I do know, you know, studying the history of my own country very closely, and I do take inspiration from my forefathers and I value that tradition. But there is a key problem with them, which is that they mix their nationalism with their liberalism. Now that made sense in the pre-World War II international context, historical context, because liberalism, when it first came into existence, it was fundamentally an anti-monarchical, anti-aristocratic movement. That’s fundamentally what it was about. And it saw common cause with nationalism in many contexts toward that end. Because obviously it makes sense that if you’re trying to expand the franchise and empower larger groups of people, you can be speaking on behalf of the nation and say:

 

“The King or the aristocracy, they’re just in it for themselves. We here, we represent the French people, or we here represent the American people.”

 

And you can assert the necessity of a kind of constitutional liberal state on that basis.

 

And also there was other historical reasons, like you think about, for example, Austro-Hungarian Empire and you know, there’s a whole patchwork of smaller ethnic groups, many of which had nationalist movements agitating for self-determination. Well, if you’re agitating for self-determination against the monarchical order, well then it makes sense to obviously to appeal to nationalism and to liberalism at the same time in that context.

 

So anyway, there was lots of we can go into that. There’s a lot of context for that.

 

But my point was a dialectical point which is inspired a lot by Schmitt’s insights, which obviously are quite pertinent and relevant because we’re talking about the greatest German political philosopher of the time period when the National Socialists are getting their movement together, and he ultimately joined the party.

 

And Schmitt’s point in his Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, which I believe was published in 1923, obviously it’s a broader text, but the core idea in that text is that liberalism and democracy have come as a package deal, but they’re actually based on core ideas which are contradictory. And that this contradiction will come to manifest itself, he prophesied in the 20th century. And that it was already beginning to manifest itself. And these ideas will become divorced from one another and realise they are actually in opposition. And what he means by democracy is the notion of popular sovereignty. And Schmitt appeals to essentially nationalism and frames it in terms of nationalism that in order to have a true democracy, in order to truly have popular sovereignty, you need a homogeneous population, because otherwise it becomes incoherent for the people to have a collective will. And he references Rousseau and how, you know, Rousseau makes the point that the general will, it’s not just the mere sum total of individual wills, it is the will of those who will the common good of the people.

 

So if you’re voting or politically active in the pursuit of your class interest or your minority, whatever group interest or your individual interest, you’re not actually genuinely participating in the exercise of popular sovereignty. You’re only really doing that insofar as you’re thinking about the common good of your people at large.

 

[26:52]

 

And so that requires a definition. You need to actually know, well, who is the demos, so to speak, that is in charge, who is the people. And that then brings you to a nationalist position of a definition of who they are and who they aren’t. And Schmitt, you know makes this point quite well and convincingly in my view. And he says:

 

“Well, this therefore puts it in opposition to the contractarian liberal view which is built around notions of rights and is built around the notion of Parliamentary discussion between heterogeneous elements. Whereas popular sovereignty implies the imposition of a homogeneous majority and its will over the state. Liberalism is built on the idea of basically creating constitutional protections and normative protections for minority interests and individual interests against the state.”

 

And he said these two ideas therefore are going to be on a collision course. And my argument therefore is that what National Socialism was a concrete historical expression of the nationalist idea, completely divorcing itself of all liberal connotations and taking itself to its logical conclusion.

 

And so when it took itself to its logical conclusion, it turned against Parliamentarianism. It embraced a kind of a very anti-bourgeois orientation. It took and it wasn’t communistic, it didn’t, you know, totally nationalise all industry or something, but it nationalised finance. You know, it pursued a kind of autarkic policy subordinating all economic interests to the national interest and also basically building up national strength and self reliance for the nation to be able to assert itself as an independent will in the world.

 

And this also being tied to its cultural programs where all media that was foreign owned or jewish owned or whatever was to be gotten rid of they went in and they broke up the Freemasonic lodges. They banned Marxist organisations. They just simply wasn’t, they weren’t going to tolerate anything which ran counter to their conception of the German people’s will. In, as in its, in a kind of culturally purified sense, a philosophically informed sense, not just whatever German people are currently supporting is the German people’s will. No! It’s only the self conscious German people’s will. And everything which gets in the way of that self consciousness needs to be basically purified from social and political life.

 

And so this is a very radical project which is differentiated from liberal projects of nationalism. And liberalism, then reconstituted itself in reaction to it. So in the post World War II international order, liberalism has now purged itself of the kind of its old nationalist associations as well. And liberalism has also purified itself according to this idea of protecting minority and individual rights and has greatly expanded its conception of its duty to minority groups and to individual groups and radically suppresses majoritarian organisation and the assertion of the majority will.

 

And you get to the point now where most liberal elites say “populism is the greatest threat to democracy”, which seems like an absurd statement. But it makes sense if you see democracy as liberalism, as Schmitt conceives of it. When they say democracy, obviously Schmitt would say, well that’s not democracy, it’s its antithesis.

 

But you know, so according to that dialectical process, which I think is pretty hard to refute, according to that dialectical process, therefore the notion, the very idea of nationalism in its opposition now to liberalism, therefore needs to be contended with as an idea unto itself. And that is therefore mediated by the spectre of National Socialism. It doesn’t mean that every single movement of illiberal nationalism that can come into existence is a one to one copy of National Socialism. But it bears some association, right? It bears some association, very important association.

 

And also I would argue that it’s necessary for nationalism to take on an illiberal form in order to actually address everything that has happened to our country since, like the infestation of foreign races and so on that has occurred. In order for us to become truly independent of these forces it’s going to require a very interventionist state. It’s going to require a very active programme that is going to be highly exclusionary and is going to have to carry out policies which are extreme according to, like the sensibilities of the common man in today’s world or maybe in any world.

 

And so as a result of that, in order to preserve our racial survival, I think we have to then look to National Socialism as an example of the nationalist idea taken to its logical conclusion and say:

 

“Well, we also kind of need to take this idea to its logical conclusion. We also need to purge ourselves of liberalism.”

 

And so we can take inspiration from them even if we don’t want to copy every aspect. And obviously if we’re not Germans, we’re not going to copy their foreign policy. That would make absolutely no sense.

 

And even in today’s Germany, I don’t think would benefit from the same kind of foreign policy. I think now the situation that Europe is in is going to require a far more pan-European solution than ever before because Europe is comparatively far weaker relative to the rest of the world and is more interdependent than ever before.

 

So the form that it takes, basically the foreign policy of National Socialist Germany is the most irrelevant aspect for us today. The relevant aspects, it’s the process by which National Socialism rose to power. The process by which National Socialism turned itself against liberal Marxist jewish elements and took on International Finance and sought to create self sufficiency and self consciousness within the German people and manifest it in a concrete political form that crushed all of its enemies in the domestic sphere. That to me is what I take inspiration from and what is pertinent and what needs to be basically rehabilitated.

 

[33:24]

 

Greg Johnson: So nationalism that’s anti-liberal, basically what you can call national populism today. What do you believe in terms of the idea of sovereignty? This is related obviously to Schmitt both in the crisis of Parliamentary democracy and also the one idea that everybody seems to know from Schmitt about the sovereign being the person who decides to be the exception. It seems to me that there are really two different concepts of sovereignty there and that the most important one is the idea of popular sovereignty. That ultimately what’s sovereign is the common good of a particular people. That is the criterion by which you judge legitimacy. It’s the criterion by which you judge policies.

 

Basically that is what populism is about. When people talk about populism today, they’re really talking about the assertion of the sovereignty of a particular people usually against a liberal, democratic political system that has battened on these societies.

 

And basically liberal democracy is the art of not giving the people what they want. I think it ultimately boils down to in practice minority rule. It starts out with protection of minority rights, but it ends up being the minority veto.

 

And ultimately that ends up being ruled by empowered minorities, political insiders, political elites, and hence populism tends to array the majority against the elites. So I mean there are two senses of the populace and populism. One is the people as a whole and its legitimate interests. And then there’s the many, the majority who are excluded from power by, and have their interests not represented by the people who do occupy power, which are the elites.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Well, I mean obviously populism has a kind of certain vagueness in a lot of its manifestations. For example, if we look at like contemporary examples, like insofar as you could call Donald Trump a populist and the MAGA movement populist or whatever, you can see that it’s completely ideologically vapid. That a lot of contemporary populist movements are like this, where they kind of have this vague kind of appeal to heartland’s traditional understanding of what the country is and is supposed to be about and play to their identity in kind of vague ways.

 

But there isn’t really like a very concrete programme that is put forward or even worldview. And so when these movements get electoral success, usually they just become recuperated by the broader system. And maybe the system makes a few subtle adaptations, or maybe even not so subtle adaptations to incorporate it and kind of return to status quo. Which is like what we’re seeing now in the United States, where what Trump’s original movement was about and what it currently is are two very distinct things. I think what Trump’s success basically means now is a recognition in a large portion of the American elite for the necessity to move from a liberal internationalist to a realist foreign policy in order to deal with a rising China and all of its ramifications. And so that’s why it’s been tolerated.

 

And basically the idea that Americans are not going to be galvanised to really face the threat of a rising China on the basis of wokeness, but instead, [chuckling] or something, they’re going to have some kind of, at least the semblance of patriotism, you know, given to them in addition to the kind of assertion of American interests specifically, rather than just this project of like liberal internationalism, America as the kind of merely like the vanguard of liberal internationalism or something.

 

But anyway, that’s besides the point. I mean, the point basically that I’m putting forward is that National Socialism is a totally cohesive ideology that is actually thought through to its logical conclusions, and it is built off, … Well, if we basically purge all other kind of, all liberal notions from the idea of nationalism and just think through, from it up, you basically get something akin to National Socialism in any kind of equivalent context to Germany in the early 20th century. If you are to repudiate it from a moral standpoint, if you can say:

 

“Oh, well, I don’t agree with this or that foreign policy decision.”

 

That’s one thing. But if you’re to repudiate National Socialism as a tendency, what you’re basically saying is that the nationalist idea itself is dangerous. The nationalist idea itself needs to be immunised against working itself out to its logical conclusion, because its logical conclusion is the most horrible thing that has ever happened ever in world history. And that’s the Spectre that we’re living in.

 

And so the immunisation of the nationalist idea results basically in it being rendered utterly impotent. And so when nationalists have to constantly provide these elaborate forms of justification as to how they’re not Nazis. And why all of the aspects of National Socialism, which are scary are not present in our nationalism. Well, what that basically forces you to do is submit to the paradigm moral and ideological of the enemy.

 

And insofar as you’re doing that, you’re basically not asserting your own idea from a strong moral standpoint. You’re not providing a strong projection of will behind your worldview, which really is the whole essence here. The assertion and total victory of the national will over the state is what the project is supposed to be! Now it becomes known, negotiating from a losing position some modicum of national survival within a system that’s fundamentally built around literally the destruction of your people.

 

[39:51]

 

Greg Johnson: Now, there are two points here. One, I don’t know how worked out a political philosophy National Socialism really was.

 

If you look at it, there were a lot of different tendencies. And when Hitler came to power, there was a lot of improvisation and chaos actually in the government. I don’t know if they had a system worked out in concrete political terms or in intellectual terms. There were all kinds of debates that were going on within Germany at the time.

 

And one of the ways to understand that is that this was part of a larger cultural and political movement, anti-liberalism, the conservative revolution in Germany and so forth. And it wasn’t necessarily a worked out political ideology.

 

But the second thing, and this is more important, I don’t see why it’s problematic for nationalists to say there’s a good kind of nationalism and a bad kind of nationalism. And the bad kind of nationalism is the nationalism for me, but not for the position [opposition]. It’s:

 

“Yes, I’m going to take care of my nation and I’m going to figure out all the ways that I can stick it to my neighbours!”

 

Which historically is what nationalism generally means.

 

And this is why you can get people who issue these pious lectures that the reason why we had the First World War and the Second World War was this bad old form of nationalism. And therefore we need to get beyond nationalism. I get that argument and I can say:

 

“Well, wait, but there’s another kind of nationalism which is not beggar thy neighbour nationalism. It’s not nationalism for me, but not for thee.”

 

It’s a consistent position that acknowledges that there’s a plurality of different peoples in the world with different interests and different ways of life. When these people have to occupy the same territory and compete for control of the same government, they generally start hating each other. And come to blows. Fortunately though, the world is big enough for every people to have its own patch of dirt, its own borders, its own state. And therefore we support nationalism, understood as the principle of self-determination for all nations. I don’t see anything wrong with that.

 

Okay, so what’s your critique of that?

 

Joel Davis: First of all, a very obvious point to make is you’re saying the world is big enough for every people to have their own nation. Okay, but the world isn’t equally divided, right? There is obviously some national territories are much bigger than others. Some national territories are more strategically advantageous than others. Some national territories have far more natural resources than others, and so on and so what this creates there is power is a reality in the global system.

 

So if you have some states that are incredibly large and powerful and some states that are incredibly small and dependent on larger states, you don’t really have self-determination of all peoples. What you have is a system that maybe could dress itself up in that language, but ultimately is a system where there’s some very big states that create orders of alliances of subordinate states in antagonism toward one another. Which is basically what we have. So that then has to then be navigated as its own reality. So in the example of Europe, Europe has been remade in the image of, basically American ideology in the post World War II international order. There hasn’t been a self-determination of all European peoples.

 

There’s been an active project of subversion led by foreign power to change the political culture and culture in general of European nations in order to make them more ideologically simpatico with American foreign policy objectives.

 

Greg Johnson: And I grant that’s an undesirable thing. And I would say:

 

“Okay, isn’t that an example of the bad old form of nationalism too?”

 

Joel Davis: But it isn’t nationalism. The American, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s imperialism. Right?

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, okay, so this goes to an even deeper point and again to bring up Schmitt again and his Concept of the Political. Schmitt, I think, provided a very good prediction and refutation in advance in 1932 when that book was released of what would ultimately be the Liberal international order. By saying that the doctrine of pacifism is either fundamentally non-political, in other words, no one is willing to actually fight for it, or it becomes, paradoxically and ironically, actually one of the most destructive and violent and imperial doctrines ever asserted. If you actually turn it into a political doctrine and you say:

 

“No one is allowed to make war on this planet because making war is itself immoral.”

 

What does that then necessitate? It necessitates an international order to be asserted to act. It proactively prevent war from breaking out, which requires basically global domination of the pacifists. Right?

 

Greg Johnson: I do think that you can create an international order that penalises people from committing aggressive war with their neighbours. And you could do things like the Persians did to the Greeks after they stopped trying to conquer them. I forget which Persian emperor, I think it was Auto Xerxes II, basically enforced peace on Greece by saying:

 

“If one Greek city state attacks another, I will align myself with the victim and put the Persian Empire’s resources behind them.”

 

And it did manage to pacify Greece for the better part of a generation. These things can happen!

 

Joel Davis: That’s the assertion of a powerful empire though. So if America comes into Europe and says, and offers the same deal, which I guess the British kind of were doing, that I guess you could say to a certain extent. Because it’s in their interests for Europe to remain divided as opposed to becoming dominated by one power and unified underneath their control into a more powerful state than the British Empire or America, then that obviously serves their particular national interests.

 

But maybe the European national interests or the European people’s interests are actually served better by becoming so powerful they don’t have to be subordinated or be mutually weakened to the British or to the Americans, but actually could become powerful enough to assert themselves and assert their destiny.

 

[47:24]

 

Greg Johnson: I think that that would be highly desirable and that’s certainly possible.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the National Socialist worldview, basically one of the core tenets, which is that in order for us to assert our destiny in the world, we have to become strong. We have to become so strong that basically no one can get in our way. That we can become, basically develop sufficient national strength to the point at which no one can say anything to us. And that is the ambition basically of every great world historical state is to become so powerful that no one from the outside can impose its ideas and its culture and its power structures upon you. And that often requires expansionism to actually become feasible. That requires active meddling in the affairs of foreign peoples in order to achieve that.

 

And so this idea that the world is big enough for everyone to be able to determine their own destiny, I just think is false! And history is my witness. Because being a small state subject to much bigger states is not actually self-determination. You aren’t determining your own destiny if for Example, you’re a small European state that, yeah, okay, your people get to elect their own representatives, but ultimately your entire political process and culture is being massively influenced by a foreign state that is trying to impose its will upon you, because you aren’t strong enough to be able to build up your own financial, commercial, military, etc., institutions that enable you to become genuinely self reliant and self-determining in a totalizing way. Self determination requires self assertion and requires far more comprehensive, it actually has far more comprehensive requirements than simply having a nominal state called Germany, where the German citizens elect representatives.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, well, this brings into play another concept of sovereignty which I think is important to distinguish, which is you have this idea of sovereign states in the world today and there are 200 of them basically. And under international law, sovereign states are equal. Now what does that mean?

 

Obviously they’re not equal in terms of population, military power or anything like that. So in what sense are they equal? They’re morally equal! Meaning that they have certain rights vis a vis one another and that these rights can be violated of course, because having rights doesn’t make you bulletproof.

 

But the point is that the idea of a sovereign state is not a material feature of a state. It’s autarky, it’s invincibility, it’s invulnerability, it’s a moral concept. It’s basically the international equivalent of moral personhood within a legal order. And if sovereignty doesn’t mean that, if sovereignty means basically invulnerability and autarky, then there is no such thing as a sovereign state. Because even the biggest and most powerful state states in the world today are less powerful than the entire rest of the world if it unites against them.

 

And so if you understand sovereignty simply in terms of autarky and invulnerability, there’s no such thing as sovereignty because nobody is autarkic and nobody’s invulnerable.

 

Joel Davis: Those are ideals to aspire towards, like to become as powerful and self reliant as possible.

 

And the more powerful and self reliant you become, the more capacity you have to self-determine. That’s what self-determination means. That you are literally in control of your own destiny, that you are acting and expressing according to standards you derive from your relation to yourself rather than your relation to others.

 

And so obviously the more powerful you are as a state, the more capacity you have to do this. And the much more difficult it is for other states, foreign states, to argue the point and to undermine you. So that’s just a concrete reality. You can argue for this abstract ideal, but in the real world that’s just a fact.

 

And so what I care about as a nationalist is the actual concrete fact of how much self-determination my people have, rather than the abstract ideal where we could say:

 

“Well, wouldn’t it be so great if everyone in the world could all agree to these abstract rules?”

 

And it’s, well, those abstract rules in practice, no one’s actually willing to fight for them unless they’re getting something out of it, generally speaking.

 

And so the current paradigm under which those rules are upheld is either defended by the Americans when it suits them, or violated by the Americans when it suits them, or defended by the Russians when it suits them, and violated by the Russians when it suits them and so on. It’s not a genuine reality. It is a sham edifice.

 

So I’d rather Pierce through that and get to the fundamental and get to the real. And this is also why it’s important to come back to, I think, Romanticism versus the Enlightenment and German philosophy itself, which in many respects is a radical accounting of particularity and in particular national particularity.

 

If you want to look at people like Herder, Fichte, there is a in romanticist German philosophy tied up within German nationalist project originally in the 19th century was:

 

“Okay, we just got ramroded by Napoleon. There’s this giant British Empire that is imposing its commercial will on the world. We need to bring all these kingdoms together into a big German state so that we can be powerful enough to protect German national particularity against these foreign influences and never be run over by a foreign military in the same way Napoleon did, ever again!”

 

[53:49]

 

And so there was a kind of a very strong movement towards recognizing all that is particular as opposed to looking for just simply what is universal rather than this ideal of well, how do we negotiate this international order according to universal principles? How do we actually find what’s particular about being German and what about our own self relation?

 

And again, the concept of national self-determination. You can see why this is actually way more relevant than what is universal about the idea of trying to universalise the concept of national self-determination into just merely a set of like universal principles that could be respected. Instead, let’s look at the actual concreteness of what is our particular national culture, what is our particular national consciousness? What does it mean? And how can it fundamentally be protected? And how can we fight for our particular, in their case, German national expression?

 

And I don’t care about the national self-determination of fucking Libyans. I don’t care about the national self-determination of fucking Syrians or Indians or all these countries that I have absolutely no care or concern for! I really don’t. I would not permit the sacrifice of one drop of the blood of our race to defend any of their nationalisms. I don’t give a shit about their nationalisms! I only care about the nationalisms of people whom I respect, people with whom I have some kind of fealty, some kind of kinship. They’re the only nationalisms that I actually care about that I find relevant.

 

And so for me, as someone who comes from a more romanticist standpoint, I empathize far more with this view that it’s from like, and particularly if you’re a German at that time, it’s like, in order for Germany to have its own culture and not be dominated by these foreign influences, we have to fall in love with ourselves and we have to build a political movement that is for us in particularity, because we’re the only ones that truly care about being German people who are not German. There’s a few Germanophiles, but generally can’t understand and don’t care about our national destiny because they don’t participate in it. So why would they? And that makes complete sense.

 

And then development of German thought. I mean, if you get to someone like Martin Heidegger, well, obviously this is actually quite this is moving into far more abstract territory.

 

But, you know, Martin Heidegger in his critique of technicity or the kind of technological worldview, technological and framing, or the kind of metaphysics of modernity, the reduction of thought, in his view, to a kind of ratiocinative calculating modes of thought fundamentally deprive us of having a kind of a relation to the homeland. For Heidegger, the homeland is something which actually is ambiguous, which is pretty rational. It’s related a lot to myth, to artistic forms, to spirituality.

 

And so, and this is very much what the German, like volkish tradition was also trying to drive at in its focus upon, you know, reviving, you know, ancient German mythologies and Wagnerian operas, you know, pertaining to pursuit of the Holy Grail, and which obviously isn’t particularly German, but it’s Germanic you could say, or it’s Northern European. It’s part of all Northwestern European culture. Trying to drive to like, what is actually the spiritual meaning of what it means to be German as opposed to just simply what is universal about all nations that Germans also possess? Actually, what is particular about individual nations is far more interesting and far more pertinent.

 

And I agree with Heidegger that basically this ratiocinative, universalistic way of thinking actually came into the world through the conduit of my people. It actually came into the world very strongly through the conduit of the Anglo English people. I actually do feel Germanophilic about this. I actually think that’s a tragedy. I think that’s a great problem. And it’s highly contributive to why we became a, not just in England, but in all of our colonial projects, we became essentially a power in the world that enabled the machinations of international finance and commercialism, and jewish ethnic interest and so on to become so monstrous through the prism of that worldview. Through a kind of loss of a spiritual sense of the homeland and our relation to all that which is pre-rational that makes up our identity as a people. And the Germans were resisting that process. The Germans had a lot more of a cultural immunisation and a high cultural immunisation against that process and a rejection of that process.

 

And so I think the Germans were the correct spiritual leaders of Europe. I think we were the incorrect spiritual leaders of Europe, which is what ended up happening Now. Europe has been remade in the image of our culture which is built, which is these notions of universal rights and so on are derived from. And it’s causing the suicide of our race!

 

And it’s also a worldview. And Heidegger makes the point that in the black notebooks that the jewish people, because they lack a homeland, their fundamental orientation towards the world is calculative, is ratiocinative.

 

And so a worldview they can inhabit, a metaphysic that they can inhabit, which is reductive in that sense, is exemplary to the accumulation of their power.

 

Whereas a worldview which tries to reach back into the pre-rational essence of the homeland into the earth from which our particular national world in the Heideggerian language, out of which it arises, but which is kind of mysterious and ambiguous, and not reducible to any kind of like, conceptual schema, that actually is the form of spiritual immunisation and the form of spiritual resistance, of the assertion of our national cultures against this kind of jewish homelessness.

 

[1:00:10]

 

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, there’s a lot to that. German romanticism, new German philosophy in general is very, especially the anti-Enlightenment strain of it, is very critical of globalisation, basically. And I think that that’s entirely correct.

 

I do think that the British mind, the tendency of Anglos is to mistake their full consciousness for the universal. And that’s very bad! Anglo-Americans, they really mistake their folkish ways as universal, and they think of themselves as avatars of the universal.

 

And that means that they basically promote the destruction of their own people and every other people, because they just don’t think that there’s any meaningful difference. I know that Swedish liberals are like this too. I was speaking to the Swedish woman who’s saying:

 

“Yes, you know, Swedes in their hearts, the Swedish Leftists believe that everybody wants to be just like them.”

 

They can’t fathom that there would be anybody who would want a radically different way of life and that therefore admitting such people into their societies could threaten it. There is something very peculiar about that.

 

But let’s just say that we affirm folkishness and say, yes, there are many different peoples. They have many different worldviews, different ways of life. And again, the best way to cultivate that is to separate them. Because we notice historically that when they’re competing for territory or government favours or whatever, the more diverse the society is, the more unnecessary conflicts that we support self-determination. You still get this question, okay, well, how is that kind of world going to be governed? You can be a complete realist about enmity, like Schmitt, you can say we will never have a world where there’s no difference between the insiders and the outsiders.

 

But you can still ask, okay, given that we accept that this is the world that we live in, what are the best ways of establishing amicable relations across a globe like that? If you affirm nationalism, if you understand that it’s in a way inevitable and you try and deal with the problems that people who are broad thinking face, which is how are we going to live together on this finite planet? You’ve got to come up with some kind of geopolitical vision of how these different groups are going to get along.

 

Joel Davis: So why is “getting along” just simply conceding to the other, like a really effective strategy in getting along with somebody is becoming far more powerful than them. So they fear you and are forced to submit to you. That’s actually a really effective strategy at people being very friendly to you is when they fear you. When they don’t fear you, it’s actually a lot harder to get their friendship.

 

So this idea that we need to have this universal nationalist ideology in order to get along doesn’t make any sense to me! What makes a lot more sense to me is how about we just become really fucking powerful and then we can negotiate from a position of strength rather than weakness in how we’re going to relate to surrounding groups.

 

Greg Johnson: And this is the situation that Whites are in today, and this is the situation that nationalists are in today. I get the image of George Floyd under the knee of a cop, under the knee of a globalist cop. And there are two ways that you can get out from under the knee of this globalist system, and only one of them really works. And that would be to appeal to whatever elements of fairness and decency there are in the guy who’s got his knee on your neck. Now that doesn’t mean that you can persuade everybody in the world, but there are many, many interlocking powers that are screwing us right now and driving us to extinction. And some of them definitely can be appealed to on moral grounds.

 

But the one thing that I know is never going to work is if George Floyd, you know, under the knee is saying:

 

“I’m going to kill you know, let me up and I’m going to kill you!”

 

And that I think is basically the position that you’re articulating. Because we’re in a situation now where we’re going to have to, because we have no power now. We’re the weak, and, …

 

Joel Davis: I fundamentally disagree that Whites collectively lack the ability to assert ourselves on the basis of our own strength. We do have that ability.

 

Greg Johnson: We do if we change our thinking about certain things, and you’re not addressing, I think, the predominant thinking patterns that stand in the way of that. And any kind of philosophy that smacks of “might is right” or something like that, I think is a non-starter for us today because we’re the weak! And if we believe that might is right, then we believe that we should be believing that our enemies are in the Right. And clearly we don’t believe that.

 

Joel Davis: That doesn’t follow at all! The reason Whites are in the position that we’re in is because of our own ideas and our own kind of moral proclivities. It’s not because of the assertion of any other group against us in a way that dominates us against our will. It is a willful embrace of these ideas. If Whites collectively mobilise the willpower to resist what is happening and assert ourselves on the basis of our own strength, we do have the strength to regain sovereignty over at least some territory, if not pretty much all of the like, our historical territories across the West. We are by far collectively the most powerful, richest, most effective fighting groups in our respective nations. Like no other group, even all of them combined would lose to us if we were organised and assertive on our own terms.

 

[1:07:22]

 

Greg Johnson: What’s stopping us?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what’s stopping us? What’s stopping us is moral cuckoldry essentially. What’s stopping us is this universalistic world view that we’re debating. I mean, what’s stopping us is this necessity to process our self assertion through some kind of like universal humanitarian, abstract set of principles of rights. And that is fundamentally a bullshit edifice. It’s not, …

 

Greg Johnson: I don’t think it’s a bullshit edifice.

 

Joel Davis: And it’s derived in a fundamentally flawed worldview from my standpoint, metaphysically and logically.

 

Greg Johnson: Okay, what is that flawed worldview? Just briefly, where does it come from? What are some of the thinkers that articulate this?

 

Joel Davis: First of all, I mean, we’ve been discussing the kind of the concrete ridiculousness of a kind of universal nationalism that it doesn’t actually in practice realise the principle of self-determination, which is the core principle with which it seeks to realise. And so therefore it’s in contradiction with its own principle. So logically it’s just a non-starter.

 

Secondarily from a metaphysical standpoint, I agree with a Heideggerian premise that this attempt at reducing the moral to a kind of universal rationality rather than asserting one’s particularity is again I think fundamentally incongruent with the human condition as such.

 

Greg Johnson: Right, okay. Okay. Yeah, well, let’s start out with that. Okay. I look at Hobbes and I think Hobbes provides us with a path by which you start out with something like a self assertive group, or a self assertive individual with no rules. Right.

 

What did Trayvon Martin call himself? He called himself a “No Limit Nigger”. I think that was the term. Well, imagine a world of “No Limit Niggers” basically all asserting themselves against one another. That’s the world that you’re picturing. That’s the world that realists in foreign policy picture. It’s the state of nature in Hobbes’s terms. And Hobbes make a very good argument that actually if you’re rational, you will want to get out of that state of nature as quickly as you possibly can and establish certain boundaries, of limits. You want to have limits! You want to have limits because in the end it’s in all of your interests. And he actually makes a fantastically cynical argument for equality. As one of my Professors as an undergraduate put it, he said:

 

“Hobbes argument for equality is this. You might be big and tough, but you’ve got to sleep sometime. And when you do, a bunch of skinny guys can get together and shank you. And that’s the end of you. That’s the end of the high and mighty.”

 

And you could do that in individual terms. Think of the prison house, right? The bully in the prison. Or you can think of it in global terms, in terms of countries.

 

And again, there’s no country that’s so big that the rest of the world couldn’t get together and shank it. You’ve got to sleep sometime, right?

 

And that means that, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, I disagree, actually. I mean, Russia and the United States have nuclear arsenals that could completely wipe humanity off the face of the planet. They are in a certain sense impossible to shank!

 

Greg Johnson: Well, if people really want to go to the limit, they can be shanked.

 

But the point is that, and there is this odd little thing that’s happened that’s very disturbing to my view because I love to say, wait a second here. Nuclear arsenal, it’s the ultimate, it’s the ultimate ace in the hole. We’ve recently had a nuclear power invaded by a non-nuclear power. You know, it’s the whole Kursk thing in the Russia-Ukraine war, which is kind of extraordinary because I was really hoping that the you could basically hide behind those nuclear arsenals.

 

But the point is that, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s a bad example because it didn’t, wouldn’t existentially threaten the Russian state. I mean, they weren’t “shanked”! It was a minor border incursion. It wasn’t going to escalate to like dropping nukes.

 

Greg Johnson: Well, but here’s the thing that they, …

 

Joel Davis: They have designs over integrating into their own federation. And they want to win the public opinion of at least the people who live in the territory they’re annexing.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, well, but you know, the point is that if you, … Hobbes makes an argument that if you have a world in the state of nature, you will all rationally, both the very strong and the very weak want to move to a conflict resolution, conflict containment model that involves things like rights.

 

Now, of course, the problem with Hobbes’s view is that it implies the necessity of a sovereign. How do you deal with a world, and by sovereign that’s a decider. And how do you deal with that in a world where states are to one another, as Hobbes would recognised, as individuals are to the state of to one another in the state of nature. There’s no overarching power, so what do you have to do?

 

Well, they’ve been trying that for hundreds and hundreds of years, since really the conclusion of the Thirty Years War, to create international law and international institutions to deal with conflict resolution.

 

And there are two models of globalism. The terrifying, horrible model of globalism, in my view, is the commercial model where everything is interlaced on the levels of the economy of desire and everything becomes commodified and everything slowly becomes homogenised because why wouldn’t you listen to Taylor Swift all over the world if you could, right? That kind of bullshit! That’s a terrifying model of globalisation because it destroys culture and peoples.

 

But there’s another vision of globalisation that I think that we have to try and figure out how to make it work, and that is the “conflict resolution” model. How can we have a world independent states, and yet make sure that these independent states don’t spin out of control and create global thermonuclear wars and things like that? That I think is a reasonable enterprise. And yes, you want to be as strong as you possibly can given that these things might not work. Go ahead.

 

[1:15:07]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you bringing up Hobbes, I mean, is kind of crazy because the whole theory of Hobbes as you kind of just mentioned and then jutted away from, is that the only way to overcome the state of nature is for there to be a monarch that isn’t just simply formally presiding over some kind of constitutional order, but is actually concretely so powerful as such that it can dominate the entire social sphere and is powerful enough to deprive us universally of all of our rights, but then in the pursuit of peace, grant us a limited series of rights. That’s the basic premise. And that what we inherit from submitting and empowering the monarch to become so powerful as to be essentially impossible to resist is that we then inherit a set of limited rights.

 

Well, in the international system, what that would mean would mean that there would have to be one country that is so powerful that it can utterly dominate the entire earth. Now if that country is dominating the entire earth and it has an ideology that is genociding my race, well, that’s fundamentally unacceptable! Now if it’s a country that is dominating the entire earth and it’s like Nazi Germany, maybe I don’t mind so much.

 

So the question is who is going to be sovereign insofar as that cannot exist, you can only really have limited pockets of negotiated relationships. So if within Europe you have one all powerful state that’s just so much more powerful than all the other states combined with, they create a regional order, but you know, that couldn’t then be universalised. You know, they don’t have the power to dominate maybe the entire planet, but they can dominate a region. Right. Like in North America, America kind of functions like that. Like it’s basically almost impossible to argue with the American government from the perspective of, and they can just flagrantly just go and you know, just, the CIA can just like go into Mexico and just start like taking over, engaging in massive covert operations. And the Mexican government barely says anything because they don’t really have sovereignty because their neighbour is just so powerful that they barely have a very limited amount of sovereignty.

 

So there’s obviously the point that I’m making is that appealing to this notion is itself the refutation of this idea of that we can sit down and just have a rational discussion about the morality of national sovereignty and create an international order around that. No! The Hobbesian argument is that we can’t sit down and have a rational discussion about our mutual rights, that the human condition doesn’t allow for that. All we can do is create a centre of power so powerful that it can impose only a limited series of rights and it basically itself be elevated outside of that same order and have the ability to violate it, have the ability and become so powerful you can’t do anything about its violations.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah, well, I understand that, but Hobbes understood that right on the global level there is going to be no sovereign. And there were other thinkers who came later, really who tried to figure out, okay, how could we have, how could we model relations between sovereign European states in such a way that they can relate to one another without, …

 

Greg Johnson: That obviously failed, didn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yes and no. There is this notion of collegiality as a model of relationships. What is that? Well, collegiality means that they’re independent actors with common goals and interests, but no overall hierarchy that controls them. And the idea of the comity of nations in international law, it is basically a collegial model for sovereign states to come together and work out their problems. It’s remarkable, though, how many sovereign states have existed for very long times with no power at all! Some of the oldest sovereign entities in Europe are the tiniest and most powerless, like Monaco or Lichtenstein or San Marino. How is that possible? Well, it’s possible because, …

 

Greg Johnson: They pose no threat!

 

Joel Davis: Well, it be you could say that. Or they have friendly relations with their neighbours.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but they pose no threat and obviously don’t have the ability to assert themselves. And so therefore it’s unnecessary to develop enmity with them. Whereas the more powerful you get, the more enemies you’re going to accrue, because the more fearsome you become.

 

And also, I’m not saying that nations can’t be friends or recognise mutual interests. Obviously they can. And from my perspective, the nations of Europe should find common cause at this time in history, because we now are in a very different world than we were in 100 or 200 years ago, when the European powers were so far ahead of the rest of the world technologically that their mutual enmity really was the decisive factor of who controlled global destiny.

 

Whereas now the rest of the world has caught up and our race needs to come together to safeguard the future of our civilisation and culture, which is very largely shared. There is a very substantial aspect of the culture of every individual European nation is the collective European culture. In fact, I would say overwhelmingly so.

 

And so in order to safeguard our civilisation, we need to find common cause and put aside old differences which in previous bygone historical contexts were more relevant, actually.

 

And that’s why there were so many wars in Europe and why now there isn’t really the same appetite for war in Europe, but there still is a current war in Europe. Why is that? Because there’s still a clash between two, basically two fundamental power structures over the determination of Russia’s sphere of influence, NATO’s sphere of influence.

 

[1:21:40]

 

 

And so, in a sense, what that demonstrates is that the only reason why you’ve had relative peace in Europe for so long is because of the domination of really big and powerful superpowers that have nukes pointed at each other and Europe’s subordination essentially to the American led international order. So that isn’t Europe creating this ideal of rational discussion where the Polish are coming and sitting down with the Czechs and sitting down with the French and working out their individual differences. It’s the fact that they’re all subject to much larger powers and so they’re not actually able to assert themselves and have genuine [chuckling] differences under these conditions.

 

Greg Johnson: Let me ask you, do you think that Europe will ever become a formidable separate independent block without one European country dominating the rest of the continent?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the reality is that when Europe, so let’s say America keeps going down this path of moving towards a realist foreign policy away from liberal internationalism which I really hope occurs. I really hope that this isn’t a temporary aberration, and I think it’s necessary because the rise of China is necessitating it. And the Americans get out of Europe largely, and Europe finds some self assertion in coming decades as a result of that and further European integration is pursued. And obviously they’re dealing with Russians to the east. And so they need to be strong and powerful to resist Russian advances.

 

And they also need to be able to provide their people with a political formula that can resist Russian subversion which hopefully moves them towards the assertion of Europe’s particularity, that moves them towards the assertion of their actual ethnic and racial identity. And we get policies like re-migration and the borders get shut. That would be beautiful if that happens. That’d be my ideal.

 

If we get into that kind of world and Europe starts to trying to re-inspire patriotism and develop a kind of a national patriot movements in various European nations that align themselves and build up independent military strength, economic strength and so on. When that Europe sits down and meets, right, the leaders of Europe to whatever this future European Union or if it has a different name, whatever, whoever is the leader of Germany, whoever is the leader of France, what they say and what they want is going to matter a hell of a lot more than whoever the leader of Croatia is or whoever the leader of Lithuania is. Right? And that’s just the reality. Now that doesn’t mean that we hate Lithuanians and we hate Croatians.

 

But at the end of the day the power of Europe is more fundamentally concentrated in those bigger, more consequential States, then there’s more minor states. And so therefore, you know, Europe will come under German and French leadership. It will. And we’ll have to go in that direction.

 

Greg Johnson: Will Germany and France fight it out?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean they probably will have antagonism, but you know, if they have a mutual animus of greater enemies around the world, that gives them a strong incentive to work out their differences and form a strong alliance. Right?

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah. I mean, it’s possible to come up with a simulacrum of human behaviour that’s entirely based on selfishness as a motivation. And liberals love to do that. Right. And foreign policy realists love to do that’s sort of what you’re doing now.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not based on selfishness though. It’s securing your national community and its future, that is not selfishness. That’s service to your people!

 

Greg Johnson: Well, but you’re talking about selfishness in terms of vis a vis other countries. And I, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Okay. So obviously Germans care more about Germans than they care about Greek people. But there could still be a wider European fidelity as well. It’s not an either or.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: They can also care about Europe at large.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Like if you’re really awake, you would realise that the particular national destiny of any one European nation is actually intimately tied to the collective destiny of the European people. And so you have to safeguard that to safeguard your own national interests as well.

 

So you can have concentric circles of identity. It doesn’t have to be one absolute identity to the exclusion of all others. There can be multiple layers of identity at play. Just like you’re a member of a family, you’re a member of member local community, you’re a member of a nation, you’re a member of a race. Like all of these things are important and have to be balanced.

 

The point of reducing it to selfishness, I mean, it’s just that only makes sense in your abstract theoretical model. It doesn’t actually make sense in the concrete humanity of what we’re discussing. Patriotism is not selfish. Patriotism is a love of the other, of the direct other of your blood!

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah. I do think it’s possible for there to be non-selfish relationships of amity and mutual respect between different peoples. And they’re.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course that’s possible, but it’s still like, for example, Australia now has an alliance with the Japanese.

 

Greg Johnson: Yeah.

 

[1:27:09]

 

Joel Davis: Now there was one point in which we were massacring each other, in the Second World War and they were a great threat to us.

 

But now Australia and Japan, because of the strategic circumstances surrounding the rapid rise of Chinese military and economic power, well now we have common cause and we have very strong military agreements. Both of our militaries have permission to operate in each other’s sovereign territories, which is agreement that I think both countries only have with the United States and maybe we have similar agreements maybe with the British actually as well. But it’s a pretty like rare agreement for either country to have with another country.

 

So we have very close military relationship now. And I admire Japanese culture. I think Japanese culture has a lot of very compelling things both historically and contemporarily and I think the Japanese people are very respectable people and I’m happy to be allied, and I think it’s a good thing for both countries for us to have an alliance.

 

But at the end of the day, if circumstances were different like in the Second World War where Japanese interests and Australian interests are diametrically opposed, then I am totally fine with killing Japanese people. Right. Because that’s actually what’s good for Australians. Those two things can both be true.

 

So it isn’t about that I respect their universal right to self-determination. I don’t! I don’t give a shit about this universal concept of self-determination! I care about the particularity of how is my region going to be organised and how can I secure a future for my people. If that means respecting the Japanese nation as our ally, then I respect the Japanese nation as our ally. I would also like it if the Chinese state was divided into like 10 states, because that would be fantastic for Australia because then it would completely weaken them and they could all be turned against each other and massacre each other. That would be in my interest as well.

 

So I don’t give a shit about the Chinese right to national self-determination because that right actually is very scary, if it’s practiced! And that’s, I think that’s a totally reasonable worldview. I care about my people more than I care about Chinese people or I care about Japanese people. So it’s all relative.

 

Greg Johnson: Well, I think that’s completely reasonable because there is this, but that’s a universal fact as well, namely that people have a love of their own and given that you have the greatest interest in your own people, it makes sense for you to take care of your own people first. But you also recognise that that’s true of everybody else on the planet. And again, you can posit an international order that respects that fact, …

 

Joel Davis: And I don’t support Aboriginal self-determination. There are people! Because that directly conflicts with my, the sovereignty of my people over this continent.

 

So I don’t actually respect the universal right to self-determination! That’s the thing. I will respect particular claims to self-determination where it makes sense, but I do not support an abstract universal. The abstract universal doesn’t actually exist! It isn’t based on anything. You’re proposing that we negotiate one into existence on the basis of our shared individual national interests. And I’m providing all these counter examples where, well, the universal often isn’t in my individual national interest.

 

Greg Johnson: We can raise the question like this. You can say, okay, let’s say that, let’s use this example. Let’s talk about property rights within Australia. You have private property rights. Now you could go through life negotiating and calculating all the whole time and saying:

 

“Well, you know, is respecting this person’s property rights in my interests in this particular moment?”

 

And oftentimes it might not be, but you might still recognise that as a general rule, having a system of private property in place benefits you as much as it benefits other people. And therefore you want to, you’re not going to go through life thinking:

 

“Can I steal this pen and get away with it?”

 

You sort of get beyond that because you recognise that you’ve got a general interest in civilised rules like respecting other people’s property. And you can go on to you broaden that out. Any kind of general civilised rules. You might be able to benefit yourself by violating these rules in particular circumstances. But in a broader sense you probably benefit from just having these rules.

 

Joel Davis: As a nationalist, I support seizing the property of foreign nationals. I support seizing the property of racial aliens. I support a taxation system that seizes a significant portion of everyone’s property in order to make arrangements for national defense. And the national interest in various other ways. And so I don’t actually respect the universal right to property. I respect the limited right to property.

 

Greg Johnson: It’s an analogy. Okay, I’m not saying, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s the same as what I’m saying on the international basis. I respect in a limited sense, the national self-determination of various other peoples, but I do not support it in an absolute sense.

 

Greg Johnson: Would you be safer in a world where people treated it as an absolute or treated it as something that they renegotiated in every particular circumstance.

 

Joel Davis: We’re never going to live in a world where people treat it as an absolute because it’s fundamentally incongruent with the human condition and with the political as such! The political is fundamentally a question of:

 

“What are you willing to fight for. On what basis can the state legitimate war? On what basis can the state legitimate putting people in prison? On what basis can the state legitimate organise men with guns, pointing them in people’s faces and potentially shooting?”

 

That’s what politics is about.

 

And so there is not going to be a world in which we all put down our guns and sit down and rationally negotiate some peaceful set of agreements. Now with our guns pointed in mutual directions, we can sit down and negotiate alliances or negotiate agreements to prevent us from engaging in mutually destructive conflicts. So we can have a limited negotiation, but we’re never going to have an absolute negotiation. So it’s not only like frivolous question that has no basis in historical or human reality!

 

[1:33:57]

 

Greg Johnson: I don’t think it’s baseless, because the world has been working in one way or another for hundreds of years to create institutions that allow different states to come together and mediate conflicts and avoid conflicts.

 

Joel Davis: But that is the world underneath the domination of the United States of America. This idea of liberal nationalism has only actually been successfully implanted, implemented underneath American global power where the American led international order has been organised around these institutions. But without the American guarantee of power, sovereignty, etc, what the American Navy guaranteeing global trade, American participation in all these international institutions, they would crumble! They would no longer function! And insofar as states have become powerful enough to challenge the American led international order, they challenge these institutions and they’re, and at the same time America itself has destroyed the legitimacy of these institutions by also violating its dictates where it saw fit, for example, in the invasion of Iran.

 

Greg Johnson: Absolutely! Absolutely!

 

Joel Davis: So these institutions are fundamentally, as I said, I use the phrase “bullshit edifice”! It’s a very reasonable assessment. It’s a very reasonable assessment because what it actually is a form of American imperialism. And that’s all it is, basically.

 

But then with a very amicable negotiation, it’s a very good propaganda. It’s a very good way of bringing your junior partners in the empire in and giving them representation and giving them a voice and so on, which is a prudent way to run an empire. But what it isn’t, is what you’re describing it isn’t actually a respect for the abstract universal of self-determination because that same American empire has been utterly destroying in concrete terms our capacity as Western states to have self-determination by literally genociding our race and creating state sponsored programs to destroy our national self consciousness!

 

So according to the abstract universal, well we’re all in all these international organisations that respect Australian sovereignty or French sovereignty or German sovereignty or Italian sovereignty or whatever. But in concrete terms there’s a series of international institutions and organisations and the perpetuation of an international order that destroys the capacity of our nations to have a genuine seat at the table because we can’t even be self conscious. We can’t even assert our national interest within our own political process!

 

So we have a bunch of traitors that will go and sit at these international meetings and represent us. Well, isn’t that fucking fantastic? I feel:

 

“Oh my national self-determination is so respected when they send some communist traitor like Anthony Albanese to go sit at the UN and go and sit down with the Indian Prime Minister and negotiate how they’re going to bring more Indian immigrants into Australia so I can be genocided more quickly!”

 

That’s fantastic!

 

Greg Johnson: Well I was, last year I gave a talk at the Institute for Historical Review in Southern California and I gave this analogy that I’ve used for years about how institutions fail, how diversity hollows out institutions. And I talked about the fire department. It was just an arbitrary thing. I said imagine the fire department decides to go woke and diversify and you know, it’s all fine, it’s all well and good if you lower standards and you spend more time worrying about the gender and racial mix of the people on the department, so forth. It’s great, it’s great for parades, it’s great for propaganda videos. But what if there’s an actual fire?

 

And then as if on cue, [chuckling] right? As if God wanted to prove my point, Los Angeles bur burned down! And we found that part of the reasons why the fire department was so ineffectual was it was being run by a lesbian and it was full of lesbians and they were all doing TikTok videos showing off their diversity, but they weren’t paying attention to what was necessary to actually put out fires. And you can just say that this is an institution that’s been rotted out by a crazed idea. Right?

 

And this is the way I think we have to understand what’s happened with NATO and the EU, and things like that. The purpose of the fire department is to fight fires and the purpose of NATO is to defend its member states. And the purpose of the EU is to pursue conflict resolution and greater prosperity and mutual understanding and respect in Europe, blah, blah, blah. And these institutions unfortunately have been become infected with these insane ideas, this insane woke ideology.

 

But we have to understand that there’s a distinction between the institutions and its purposes and the bizarre destructive goals that they have been wrenched around to by these ideologues.

 

Joel Davis: They’re not just “bizarre”, Greg. They’re not just like this random appendage of ideas that spontaneously emerged within these institutions and just made them retarded! What these ideas are in concrete and historical terms is a social engineering project to actively destroy the national identities of the constituent states that make up this liberal international order. Because of the recognition that nationalism is an idea which contradicts this liberal international order and its fundamental premises itself, embodied in National Socialist Germany. So, but if you understand it historically and dialectically, then that is the case.

 

Like if you look at the motivations of these “woke” academics, so to speak, if you look at the motivations that they explicitly state themselves, particularly in that 1950s, 1960s period where these ideas are being formulated and they’re being actively supported and so on, their concrete motivation is directed specifically at the Third Reich and its conditions. And there was a mutation in Left-wing ideology around the recognition that:

 

“Well, when the White working class is empowered, they didn’t actually support socialism, they supported fascism and National Socialism. And so the Left needs to be reconstituted around a different set of clients as opposed to the working class.”

 

[1:40:47]

 

 

Greg Johnson: Absolutely, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And so all of, all of these things are fundamentally relevant. And so the rehabilitation of the nationalist idea as something which can stand necessarily has to stand against the Liberal international order. The rehabilitation of a nation which asserts itself in its particularity that doesn’t need to justify itself within these, the shackles of these moral universalisms that you’re so partial to is fundamentally tied to the historical experience of the National Socialist regime insofar as it existed.

 

Now that doesn’t mean that every single illiberal nationalist is exactly the same as a National Socialist. But what it does mean is that nationalism has been fundamentally cucked and morally outmoded from our political process. It can’t represent itself correctly, it can’t assert itself, and in fact is being actively attacked pre-emptively and purposefully to make it harder and harder and harder for any for a nationalist movement to ever exist, that it has any concrete chances of success in any of our respective democracies. In order to preserve this liberal international order where no nation starts thinking about its own interests too hard and starts asserting them too directly and brings down this whole bullshit edifice as I called it, and starts challenging the American led liberal international order.

 

So this is all interconnected! It’s not just like oh, we had this great idea of liberal internationalism back in the 19th century and it went all wrong with wokeness. We could just get back to it. It’s completely non-dialectical, it’s completely ahistorical to think like that!

 

And it’s also just patently ridiculous when you think about how discourse actually works in the contemporary situation. That’s why it works the way that it does. That’s why whenever you start advocating for anything that sounds like White nationalism or ethno-nationalism in any White country, particularly in Western Europe or the English speaking world, immediately you start getting called the Nazi and all of these discussions around National Socialism start popping back up because it is all fundamentally tied. But there still needs to be a level of rehabilitation where we say:

 

“Okay, but the Germans asserting their national interest wasn’t some unique historical evil.”

 

In fact it actually makes sense why they would react against liberalism, why they would react against Marxism, why they would react against jewish subversion in the way that they did, why they would find a necessity to take on the Soviet Union and the Anglo-American world order to try and assert a different idea for Europe and a different political order for Europe. All of this actually makes sense! And is actually things that we can sympathize with and you should sympathize with, particularly in retrospect after seeing what has happened after their defeat, if you actually care about the European race and its destiny.

 

Greg Johnson: My position still boils down to this. I think that National Socialism was the wrong kind of nationalism! It was the bad kind of nationalism in the sense that it was imperialistic, that it was aggrandizing itself at the expense of other primarily White European nations.

 

And basically I think that what nationalists need to do, and I’m going to put this in an intentionally provocative way, is that we need to solemnly swear that we’re not going to do that kind of shit again!

 

Joel Davis: I diametrically oppose you. I think it was the good kind of nationalism precisely because it didn’t cuck itself to these universalist moral limits that you want to impose upon nationalism, and actually took on a form that was actually capable of asserting itself in a totalizing way against the enemies of nationalism, which were foreign and domestic. And that in order for us to free ourselves as a race of all of these forces, whether it be the Leftists, whether it be jews, whether it be what have you, structures of international finance, capitalist elites that are diametrically opposed to nationalist goals, all the rest of it. We need to take on a similarly uncompromising ideological project that seeks to seize state power and then use state power to utterly destroy and eradicate them from our lands and push them back. Create an international order in which they fear us too much to attack us.

 

That is ultimately the only way in which we can genuinely have self-determination as a race is to become powerful enough to do that, to actually defeat our enemies! And actually be sovereign over our own territories. And that’s what those are the principles in National Socialism, not necessarily the, … Now German Chauvinism I, from the perspective of culture, I do think the Germans had the greatest culture of any nation in Europe. They are the cultural and spiritual Guardians of the European race, particularly in the modern world. You could make historical arguments as well, but particularly in the modern world because okay, you want to cry about Poland. Where’s Poland’s Beethoven? Where’s Poland’s Wagner? Where’s Poland’s Hegel? Where’s Poland’s Nietzsche? Where’s Poland’s Heidegger? Where’s, … The list goes on. The Germans and their contribution is exceptional without equal in the modern world.

 

[1:46:16]

 

And also it is antagonistic directly to the ideas of which have destroyed Europe. The Germans were the great power in Europe that actively, on a cultural and political basis provided the most resistance to the development of this hellscape that is what has become of modernity.

 

So the Germans should be Chauvinistic to a very large extent. They should see themselves as superior because they actually are on a cultural basis. But I don’t necessarily mean that doesn’t necessarily mean they should be genociding the other European peoples. It doesn’t mean though that the other European people should be looking to German culture for leadership as opposed to looking to Anglo-American culture for leadership, which has been a total disaster! Which is what has actually happened due to our imposition. And what that means is jewish cultural subversion and leadership to a very large extent because we’re infected with this.

 

So that’s what has actually become of Europe’s destiny, which has been a total disaster! So I think Germanophilia is actually necessary for the White race because the Germans did provide, in their political thought, in their philosophical thought, in the development of their particular nationalist movement, the most spiritually powerful refutation of all of these forces. And then they then created, in a political form, the most politically powerful opposition to all of these forces.

 

And so, of course we should take inspiration from it. Of course we should defend it. Absolutely!

 

Greg Johnson: And yet they were defeated by liberal internationalism. Is there any lesson in there?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they were defeated by an ideology that is genociding our race. So you could say:

 

“Hey, this ideology that is genociding our race won against an ideology that was trying to defend our race. So maybe we should side with the ideology that genocides our race!”

 

No! That’s not the lesson to be taken away.

 

Greg Johnson: Okay, well, I mean, we’ve almost run out of time, so I don’t want to go, … I’m envisioning a huge digression here, which I don’t want to get into. Because I don’t want to digress from history, from philosophy into history again, because I do think that that’s the for me, I wouldn’t say that I wasted my time reading David Irving, but it was a digression from philosophy into history. And to the extent that I learnt anything from it, my feeling is that the rest of the world has a justified suspicion of people who say:

 

“I want nationalism, like Germany between the wars.”

 

Joel Davis: I have a justified suspicion that of anyone who claims to be for our race, but proposes that we frame our nationalism within the ideological and philosophical framework that is precisely antagonistic to nationalism, which is what liberal variants of nationalism are.

 

Greg Johnson: I just don’t think that they are necessarily antagonistic to nationalism properly understood. I think it’s possible for there to be distinct nations that are proud of their identities and wish to pursue their own destinies and that do so without being bad global citizens. And that’s the fear that is constantly being evoked whenever nationalism comes up.

 

And of course, in part, it’s being evoked in bad faith, but it finds purchase in people because they think:

 

“Well, yes, maybe there’s a better way of doing this.”

 

And this is why I do think that I think we should try and get beyond interwar and let’s just not even say National Socialism, but interwar nationalisms, because I think we need a new Right. And that we need to understand that it’s possible to advocate for a plurality of different nations.

 

Joel Davis: We can’t have a totally free discussion about what form that can take in the contemporary world unless National Socialism is at the very least rehabilitated enough to be relativised and for its ideas to be seen as a series of options on the table that should be considered and debated, as opposed to it being like before we even discuss. Start the discussion the premise is that it’s immediately beyond the pale.

 

Greg Johnson: Well, I would agree with that.

 

But I do think that if we had that discussion, and maybe we’ll continue this discussion, because I’d like to bring you around to my thinking, which is to basically say:

 

“We need to step over this.”

 

We need to relativise it. We need to understand it in its context. We can even appreciate it as long as it remains dead. But that we have to create something new for the world situation that we’re in today. And it’s not just because of National Socialism, but they always bring it up.

 

But you know, even if none of the unpleasantness of World War II had happened. Let’s say there was only one World War, you would still have globalists with their pious lectures about the evils of nationalism that led to the First World War. I think it’s bunk, but we have to respond to them.

 

Joel Davis: But the moral weight of these pious lectures is only something that has been able to be asserted through military victory. If the Germans were successful in a military sense in the Second World War, and they were obviously successful at convincing Germans and convincing also substantial portion of other European nations to side with their metaphysical war is what I would describe the Second World War as fundamentally, of the particular against the universal. They did win the argument with a lot of people in the European continent. It wasn’t like they didn’t have a compelling position that was just refuted because it was inherently objectionable. They did have a compelling point of view. They did have an inspirational point of view. Incredibly inspirational point of view. What political leader had a more inspirational point of view than Adolf Hitler? None! He’s the most inspirational politician ever! Right.

 

So they had a very compelling idea. And the reason why that idea is now marginalised is not because it wasn’t compelling. It’s not because it doesn’t carry weight. It’s been marginalised through a totalizing suppression by the State, through mass indoctrination imposed through a military victory of a hostile foreign power, multiple hostile foreign powers. Powers which are fundamentally rooted in evil ideas that we wholeheartedly must refute in defense of our race and in defense of nationalism as an idea! So that you’re not really contending with properly. You know, you’re not really actually acknowledging that reality, which is, I think, impossible to avoid.

 

[1:53:28]

 

Greg Johnson: I’m not sure of your point, because I don’t think it’s true. I think the main stigmatisation of nationalism is based on war! It’s based on unnecessary suffering caused by one nation basically trying to, …

 

Joel Davis: You can describe the Second World War in just as plausible way because you can’t tell me that the Allied narrative on World War II is 100% historically accurate. In fact, they make it illegal in a lot of Europe to even debate the Second World War openly.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Greg Johnson: So one side of the argument is entirely suppressed, even in countries like ours. Well, I mean you don’t live in America anymore, but in countries like ours, like in the English speaking world, it is still legal to debate the Holocaust in theory, but in practice, any actual historian who tries to do it they’re not going to be able to work at a university. They’re not even going to be able to get their books published by any kind of mainstream publisher. They’re totally marginalised from mainstream discourse.

 

So that’s not a reasonable:

 

“We’ve sat down and we’ve had a reasonable and rational accounting of the Second World War and of early 20th century European ideologies. And we’ve come together as a society in a spirit of rational discussion and free thinking. And we’ve come to this conclusion.”

 

That’s laughable as a premise! In an actually open discourse where both sides can present themselves the National Socialist sympathetic or fascist sympathetic view of the Second World War, which portrays it as a result of the encroachments of Anglo-American universalism, of the Soviet Union and so on, the revision, the so-called revisionist narrative would be compelling to a very large amount of people.

 

In fact, insofar as it is being able to be to kind of poke its head up on the Internet, it is actually showing a lot of organic popularity right now!

 

So you’re kind of presenting it as if the ideas on your side are just like so incontrovertible and they’re just so compelling and the ideas on my side are just so ridiculous and so morally objectionable that no one would ever consider them!

 

Greg Johnson: Oh no! I would never present things in that way. Not at all! You misunderstand me. What is the root of liberalism? Ultimately, the root of liberalism as an ideology is dealing with the Thirty Years War, and other religious wars in Europe after the Reformation. That’s what drives it! There’s an essay by Judas Schlar called The Liberalism of Fear.

 

And I think liberalism in many ways is driven by fear, fear of insane violence! And I think the Liberal international order is driven by fear of insane violence. Like the First World War, like the Second World War, and the fear of nationalism. Nationalism is scapegoated.

 

And of course, it wasn’t just nationalism that was at the root of these wars. It takes a world to have a World War. And not all the parties were fighting for national self-determination. Obviously Stalin wasn’t doing that. But that aside, people want an alternative to a Third World War, another world at war. And the rehabilitation of interwar fascisms is going to be very difficult, there’s an uphill battle. And it’s not just the battle that’s been set in place since the Second World War. It’s an uphill battle against problems that people have been pushing back against since the Reformation.

 

Joel Davis: But also, you also have the other side of that coin, which is that. Well, yes, like often major conflicts can be quite shocking to the communities involved in them and they can retreat into a more pacifistic set of doctrines for a period of time.

 

But then there always comes a point as well in history where a particular paradigm becomes so intolerable and a different idea in opposition to it becomes so compelling that eventually you get another major conflict. And that’s part of the human condition.

 

And right now our race is being genocided! Right?

 

So this is existential. This isn’t just a battle of ideological preference or something on the basis of these values or those values. This is a fundamentally existential question. Are we going to continue to exist as a race or not? And that is in a very precarious position. And the entire establishment of the Liberal international order is basically in an agreement that. Yeah, that this is either unimportant or that they actively support it. Right. In most cases.

 

So under those conditions, an ideology that is violent or that has violent potential is actually alluring. An ideology which limits itself purely to moralizing and rational discourse and so on lacks appeal because we do not have a rational and sympathetic interlocutor with whom we’re negotiating our survival. Here we have an existential enemy. And an existential enemy can only be confronted through force, through active resistance.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yes and no.

 

Greg Johnson: That is why my ideaactually has incredible relevance to the contemporary situation, because I do not believe that we’re going to negotiate our survival under this order. I think we’re going to need to assert it.

 

[1:59:26]

 

Greg Johnson: I disagree with you on this because what we have is we’ve got an existential enemy that’s a rather small party, a rather small number of people spread around the world in key positions. But these people depend upon a large number of other people who are basically just goofy liberals. And these goofy liberals can be persuaded. Especially because even from their point of view, there’s something ridiculously unjust about, say, the idea that:

 

“It’s okay for China to be for the Chinese, and Africa for the Africans, but White countries are for everyone.”

 

There are things about this ideology that’s promoting and greasing the way towards White genocide. They’re just flagrantly immoral by liberal universal standards!

 

And frankly, what we have to do to beat the enemy, which is an existential enemy and is not going to be persuaded, but to beat them, we have to start reducing the number of people who are on their side! People who take their phone calls and take their money and make this shit happen! We have to reduce the number of people on their side. And the way we can do that most easily is not playing into the stereotypes of the 1930s, but by using patient arguments that appeal to moral universalism, ideas of fairness and things like that. Because there’s nothing unfair about nationalism for all people.

 

Joel Davis: What you’re now appealing to is, first of all, a quantitative rather than qualitative argument. You’re saying:

 

“Well, if we remove the moral barriers to entry for the largest number of people, this is going to ultimately be what best serves the nationalist movement.”

 

I believe in quality over quantity. I believe that what is actually necessary is to cultivate a spirit of radicalism and of sacrifice.

 

Because the reality is in politics, there is a Pareto distribution of political influence. A very small amount of people have pretty much all the influence.

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely.

 

Greg Johnson: And most people are not that politically active at all! They maybe vote once every four years, if that. And they don’t really have a very well developed political worldview. Only a very small minority of the population is politically engaged enough to even have an ideological worldview, and is engaged enough to be participating in the political process in a more direct way.

 

And those people fundamentally set the paradigm. So going for broad spectrum mass appeal with people who are largely indifferent towards politics is not going to be that successful. We already have the opinion polls, right? In basically every White country. Nationalist political policies are more popular than their alternatives on basically every metric. What actually will create political power is a committed group of radicals who are willing to devote their life, their resources, their time, their efforts to struggle for political victory. An ideology, …

 

Greg Johnson: I absolutely agree with that.

 

Joel Davis: Inspiring those people than an ideology like mine. An ideology like yours, the spirit of compromise, the spirit of kind of reducing oneself to achieve mass appeal is going to actually turn off those who seek after ideological coherence, those who seek after purity of thought, those who seek after purity of principle.

 

And also your worldview is fundamentally already conceding defeat in many respects to the enemy. It is fundamentally lacking in confidence in our own people’s innate capacity to assert our collective will.

 

Greg Johnson: I absolutely have enormous and reasonable doubts about that! Until they are given, … I mean, people. This is a very cynical thing. People are only as good or bad as they are, … You know, basically, they’re as good as they’re permitted to be, or they’re as bad as they’re permitted to be. What permits them? Well, ultimately it’s going to be their consciences.

 

But there’s another thing about the sort of political process as I understand it, that needs to be brought in here. I do think that most people are politically passive. I do think that our enemies are highly, politically, active. But they exist in tiny numbers. But around them is a group of people who are more politically engaged because they’re cogs in the machine. And it’s those people. And that would include, you know, educated people with above average social capital, people with above average incomes. These people count more. And these people are being held in bondage basically, to the woke idiots who are running our race to ruin by certain moral principles that they hold. I think that that moral consciousness has been hacked and distorted and turned against our interests and that we can, by appealing to them, change things around. And we can’t do that by enacting 30s fascist stereotypes.

 

And there’s no way of doing that!

 

Joel Davis: Let me respond to that though, because number one, what you’re basically saying is that, yes, the issue is the moral state of our people. What I believe the solution then is to create an inspirational, romantic, idealistic notion in direct opposition to those moral values. Because frankly, the vast majority of Whites do not go along with Left-wing ideology, or Leftism gone mad, whatever it is. This ideology of White self-erasure on the basis of its internal compunction and they’re like deeply committed to it, to its values. It’s simply a product of social inertia and a fear of social exclusion and other social penalties. It’s easier to just internalise and believe the prevailing worldview to basically go along to get along. There’s only a very small minority of Whites that are actually active Leftists that really, truly and deeply and viscerally believe in these principles. And they’re obviously largely motivated by themselves being very spiritually and psychologically defective to the point of a collective self hatred which I diagnose as most fundamentally being a consequence of seeing this ideology as a way to drag down their superiors within our own race.

 

[2:06:39]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

[2:50:10]

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/22/2025 = 107)

unHerd
6 months ago
If NS didn’t matter the Jews wouldn’t be working so hard to try and stamp it out.

21
0
HH
6 months ago(edited)
Greg Johnson : “1930’s Nationalism gives people bad global citizens concerns”. Conveniently forgets the entire globe was carved up by three liberal democracies Britain, France and the Netherlands all at the peril of a sword/gun.

18
0
Hide replies

@v0lum3
6 months ago
Hitler dindu nuffin

2
1
Show reply

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago(edited)
Britain. France and the Netherlands weren’t anything even close to a democracy when they built up their empires. Nor are they really democracies today. They are liberal plutocracies, not democracies.
Plutocracy is the problem, not democracy as such.
A constitutional ethno-democracy where only members of the ethnos can possess citizenship and vote or hold office, and, furthermore, with a national socialist economic system, would work just fine.
OTOH, a one-party dictatorship is no panacea.

Hide replies

@v0lum3
6 months ago
Democracy is retarded in any context. The Greeks figured this out 2500 years ago.

1
0
Show reply
HH
6 months ago(edited)
Those details you outline matter none. The fact is 90 percent of the modern world views
them as liberal democracies, the original ANTIFA, the antithesis to Natsoc, Fascism and Nationalism. So the statement stands, the swords and guns that actually took over the world were made in democracies and used by the soldiers of liberal democracies. But “ooooo Hitler, the mad man, wanted to rule the entire world”. Of course people who read CC will know this may not be entirely true but to the normal who thinks in terms of global citizen, the actual description of the type of governance does not matter.

1
0
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
What things are and what people call them can be very different things. You can deal with the illusion if you please. I’ll stick with the reality. Plutocracies, not democracies.
The actual point: decisions for the US, UK, Netherlands and France to go to war are NOT made democratically. They are made behind closed doors by wealthy elites and the politicians who serve them.
“Democracy” is a covering screen for authoritarian rule from the shadows by unaccountable plutocratic elites and their clients in office.

Hide replies
HH
6 months ago(edited)
Again you’ve failed to understand the psyche of the masses.
1930’s to 90 percent of the public: Britain/France Netherlands = liberal democracies therefore good, and no one cares that between them they carved up the entire globe with swords and guns made in democracies.
1930’s to 90 percent of the public: Germany = Nationalist, fascist, authoritarian therefore bad, so bad global citizens.
That’s how 90 percent of the Western mind interprets that time. What you and I may understand about democracies being nothing more than an illusion does not matter. We are in a tiny minority.
Point stands, Greg Johnson overlooks that democracies have been far worse global citizens than any Nationalist one.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
You’re failing to realize that public opinion has been manipulated by the plutocrats who own all the media and control education as well. The public has been massively lied to and conditioned to believe what is useful for the plutocrats – who have been increasingly led by Jews as time has unfolded.
However, some of the support for democracy is indeed authentic and this is fine so long as this democracy would be limited to members of the ethnonation, i.e. ethnodemocracy. Jews would lose their citizenship along with all non-Whites and not be able to participate.
I am not advocating a simple one-man one-vote system, but a moderately democratic system involving voting by a subset of “active citizens” who have demonstrated serious commitment to studying public affairs. Active citizens’ votes would be weighted to count as, say, 2/3rds of all votes for President and the Senate. Alternatively, only their votes might be counted in selecting the President and Senate.
The office of the President would also be strengthened by giving Presidents 12 year terms and a Constitutional authority to issue executive orders which would have the same force as laws passed by both houses of Congress.
General elections involving all citizens might be used for selecting the US House of Representatives and for selecting state legislatures and governors. Or, alternatively, weigh active citizen votes more heavily.
Furthermore, there is an absolute need for a more egalitarian and populist economic system.
Eliminating plutocracy eliminates Jewish control of the media and education since it takes away the Jewish money power necessary for monopolizing control of media and education.
Taking away citizenship from Jews and reinstating disabilities on them in combination with ending plutocracy solves the JQ. The solution is to reverse the error of Jewish emancipation while eliminating the means by which Jews rose to power in the first place – i.e. their money power.
Less

Hide replies
HH
6 months ago(edited)
Am not going to read all that given your refusal to understand you’re in an absolute minority.
It’s very simple, the Western world sees Britain, France and the Netherlands as democracies and the NSDAP as baby murdering, oven baking, brain washed psychos. One of those groups ruled the entire world between them and the other is constantly accused of being bad because they wanted to rule the entire world but didn’t.
Democracy good regardless of the millions murdered by them.
Natsoc bad.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
You’re flogging a dead horse. Who’s defending liberal imperialism around here? In point of fact the Western nations were not, and are not, democracies. They were, and are, plutocracies with managed public opinion. The “Western world” is not a monolith with a unitary opinion set in stone forever. Western public opinion has been massively manipulated by its ruling liberal plutocracies monopolizing the mass media and education. Opinions are mutable. Especially when they are based on gross propagandistic manipulation and lies.
“Democracy good…Natsoc bad”
Aren’t you simply taking the opposite, dogmatic, equally Manichean, position “Natsoc good; democracy bad”?
1930s German National Socialism is not a panacea nor is democracy necessarily a problem. OTOH liberalism, understood as plutocratic class rule, is definitely bad and needs to end. But a constitutional ethnodemocracy with a national socialist economic system is very different from the so-called “liberal democracy” which has existed in the West.
This is what I am proposing: a CONSTITUTIONAL ETHNODEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC with NATIONAL SOCIALIST (anti-plutocratic) ECONOMIC SYSTEM.
I take the best features of both “liberal democracy” and national socialism while jettisoning their bad (or at least problematic) features. Liberalism/plutocracy is rejected from “liberal democracy” and the fuehrer principle (individual and one party dictatorship) and the spirit of militarism from German National Socialism.
What is wrong with this? Why must there be dictatorship? Why must there be a spirit of militarism? Why must we embrace romantic nationalism as Joel exhorts and believe in extravagant conceits of mystical White superiority (rather than merely substantive innate difference)?
Less

Hide replies
HH
6 months ago
Again not reading all that. Stopped at the first sentence. You clearly have knowledge of esoteric descriptions of different styles of governance and whether they are what they say they are but this does not matter to the masses.
Fact is to the masses : Britain, France, Netherlands all good because democracy and ANTIFA. (Actually ruled the world at sword/gun point.
:NSDAP bad because Nazi, Fascist, nationalist wanted to rule the world (but didn’t). Even the supreme leader Greg Johnson is not above this thought trap.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
“Again not reading all that. Stopped at the first sentence.”
You’ve plainly closed your mind to any ideas which challenge your dogmatic beliefs. So I’ll leave you to the “based” echo chamber.

Continue Thread

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
“Greg Johnson overlooks that democracies have been far worse global citizens than any Nationalist one.”
Replace the word “democracies” by the phrase “liberal pseudo-democracies” and I would agree. I’m not sure Greg would even disagree. He didn’t deny the bellicosity of Britain, France and the US. He simply (and unfairly) accused Hitler of aggression.
Hitler’s hand was forced in Poland. I’m not referring merely to the terrorist attacks on Germans living in Poland. Stalin was building up the Red Army to prepare for the takeover of all Europe (Suvorov’s The Chief Culprit and Meltiukov’s Stalin’s Lost Opportunity). If Hitler had not invaded Poland in tandem with Stalin in 1939, the Soviet onslaught in 1941 would have fallen first on Poland which would have quickly been overrun. The Red Army would then have invaded Germany on the offensive rather that being caught on its back foot as it had been by Barbarossa.

ThinRedLine
6 months ago
Greg conceded every single point of discussion yet still maintained that NS was the bad kind of Nationalism

18
4
Hide replies
HH
6 months ago
Greg Johnson suffers from boomer brain combined with the usual angry liberal mindset.

12
1
HH
6 months ago
Johnson gets emotional towards the end as his points were taken apart and reverts to “NATSOC lost though nuh nuh nuh nuh nuh”. What an emotional response.

16
2
Hide replies

@hhhhwhitepill
6 months ago(edited)
What is such a point intended to even convey? The German military lost owing to a few strategic blunders and an evil (collapsing) British Empire. The latter owing to the Eternal Anglo Problem.
It’s a bit more than a “stretch” to suggest that natsoc was “defeated” in any meaningful way beyond the decidedly narrow lens of warfare. We can’t bring it back? Why not? Because it “failed?”

7
2
Hide replies
HH
6 months ago(edited)
Johnson is effeminate and often exhibits female energy. It was nothing more than a chic lashing out because she’s losing an argument.

4
1

@EverybodywakeUp
6 months ago
Defeated the greatest , people and regime in history. To then pass a empire over to the worst cucked jew, nigger loving country in history, only nigs who have patents come America ffs it’s a disgrace.

ThinRedLine
6 months ago
Germany was defeated by a far larger powers it was a simple numbers game

12
3
Hide replies
PavlovPuppy
6 months ago(edited)
Why are you implying that National Socialism inherently requires Imperialism, Unfriendly Foreign Affairs, Denial of Foreign Sovereignties, Desire for War, Genocide etc?? I think your still falling for some Jewish propaganda, which is hard to believe because your clearly very intelligent. What the hell is going on here Overall I agree with Joel more than you, but you do make some good arguments. I am less might is right than Joel as I think friendly cooperation should be prioritized but there is also a requirement for power, leverage of trade/goods and military strength. However, preservation of the Race/Nation is always number one and it’s requirements can become very situational. I think there is a synthesis to be found here which would create a perfect system. Also I think National Socialist Germany was much more in line with some of your values than you and even Joel seem to think. They really were not Imperialists as much as they were cooperative with foreign states. They were certainly not genocidal, they did not want war, at all. They took the Sudenten which was theirs and was reasonably needed for living space. Other than that they temporarily occupied states for their own protection as well as a shield against communist forces for Europe as a whole. They were literally the friendliest occupations in history lol. They were welcomed with celebration, parades, literally showered with kisses and flowers at their feet in most cases especially in Eastern Europe where they were seen as liberators. Ultimately they did save Europe from becoming one big Bolshevik genocide and they deserve the credit for that. Anyways, this was very intelligent and thought provoking, you guys did a great job staying respectful, not interrupting etc. Its great to see! Be more National Socialist my friend, it is the way!! Hail Victory!
Less

9
1
Hide replies

@EverybodywakeUp
6 months ago
Yeah America. have led everyone into a jew washed state. America is the only place to worship blacks and jews then pushing it into Europe. You have Hollywood and let jews push this bullshit, Hitler said you’re a jewish cesspool and negroid dump who has nothinh in common with Europe. You basically armed isral to the teeth also never kicked them out once apart from cuddle and protect them.

4
0
Earthling Carl
6 months ago
Easy Joel W.

10
3

@filled_soda
6 months ago
Hail Joel, Tom, Blair and Jacob ○/

9
2

@Six
6 months ago
we are all nationalists. so is the socialism the problem? a redundant question unless you think we can have national capitalism. i think thats the proven failure here

7
1
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
6 months ago(edited)
You can’t be a Nationalist with out socialism

10
3
Hide replies

@Six
6 months ago
ties a nice bow on it doesnt it…

7
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
6 months ago
it does

5
0

@Arilando
6 months ago
Of course you can.

0
1
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
6 months ago
If you don’t care about the lesser of your people how can you call your self a Nationalist ?

2
0

@Scythe
5 months ago
No I don’t think that’s the issue Keith and Greg have. Free market capitalism obviously isn’t compatible with any form of nationalism. As far as I can see, Keith and Greg’s problem with National Socialism is a matter of taste, optics, genuine ideological difference, and a matter of what is realistic. Though I do sympathize with where they are coming from, and can’t say I’m a proper National Socialist, I think we do need to change the way people view the Third Reich, expose the lies around ww2. As this is the founding mythology of the postwar order. Unlike Joel and many others however, I don’t think we should necessarily change peoples views
from allies good, axis bad, to allies bad, axis good. Because it’s not that simple. We should merely stick to the facts and not narratives.

odysees dumb comment system
6 months ago
Aussies are lucky to have such awesome guys. Ive been following their stuff and they just seem to get it over there. They dont have all this gay infighting. This was very civil, but usually this debate is completely destructive. After Charlottesville the whole movement shattered, and it wasnt so much the actual event, it was the infighting that followed that we never recovered from. But people are becoming less afraid to talk to us again finally, hopefully we dont fuck it all up again fighting over optics like a bunch of retards.

5
0
Love of our People
6 months ago(edited)
Germany’s loss in WWII was without question one of the most profound tragedies and disasters in human history, perhaps THE great tragedy of human history. It was certainly negative. The United States government and the Soviet Union were two of the most evil forces ever seen on the planet (in the case of the former, it remains so).
One point I’ll give Greg, using the moral argument is a tool in our tool box that we have to employ at this point. We’re not in a position to just impose our will, far from it. Even Russia and America today use the facade of moral arguments when presenting their position to the world. Even if we grant that that’s all such arguments are, they’re still useful enough that the great powers resort to them to some extent. We should make a point of arguing our case from a moral perspective, while also working to gain as much power for our people as possible. We should leave no tool unused.

5
0
Northern Blue
6 months ago
Joel butchered him here. Cc came across as a Liberal unfortunately. A little convoluted at times.

5
1
The Ravens Hall
6 months ago
All of these other racial or ethnic groups if they could dominate us or any other group that is not them they would. The truth is that these other groups are fundamentally different to us with different conceptual notions of morals.
Also people misunderstand the ‘might makes right’ phrase, it is illustrates that no laws, morals or ethics actually mean anything as it is power that actually allows you maintain, protect and enforce them.
Also focusing on our own people and having our interests put above all others groups is what all the others are doing.

5
1
ThinRedLine
6 months ago
War is a part of the human experience and there is no reasion to think that Liberalism is less violent , we had plenty of wars since WWII and the reason why we didn’t have a WWIII is because of Nuclear weapons, were it not for these weapons we would surely have had a WWIII already in the fifties or sixties

6
2
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
6 months ago
Liberalism is the ideology of the capitalist elites, especially the financial capitalist elites. Capitalist elites don’t want a free market. They want monopolies and direct managerial control. J. P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller made explicit statements to this effect.
Liberalism tends toward imperialism whenever this seems to be a feasible option. Capitalism is inherently expansionist since without continuous growth it ceases to function. The canonical example of a liberal polity is the British Empire. You can’t build and sustain an empire without war and repression. Yes, indeed, liberalism is violent.
One shouldn’t let oneself be deceived by the ideologies that have emerged in association with liberalism such as egalitarianism, democracy and the idea of universal individual rights. They are not what they seem. The core of liberalism is plutocracy. Any ideology which contradicts plutocracy will not get far. Though the capitalist elites make Machiavellian use of such ideologies for social control, they will never allow such ideologies to actually be realized as intended by their sincere adherents. Liberalism, i.e. plutocracy, is inherently authoritarian, elitist and anti-democratic. Even the individualist element in liberalism is deceptive. It is really just a means of atomizing people so as to render them helpless to resist elite control. It is a totalizing strategy, as Michel Foucault described clearly in his lecture/essay Omnes et Singulatum and his 1977-78 lectures at the College de France, Security, Territory, Population.
There is a vanguard element within the capitalist elite which wants to take monopoly to its ultimate logical conclusion and consolidate control over all means of production and run society as if it were a single gigantic megacorporation. This, in essence, is communism, i.e. a centrally planned and directed command economy. Which is to say: The telos of capitalism is communism. Today’s name for such a society is technocracy.
Less

2
1
ThinRedLine
6 months ago
Hail Joel

8
4
Show reply
renunciate
6 months ago
Joel is making the rounds this week, eh?

5
3

@whitemonkey
6 months ago
id just like to say. NATIONAL SOCIALISM FOR ALL NATIONS.

2
0

@chambleth5
6 months ago
I think Joel makes some fair points, but it’s important to look at what he actually does in practice. He led a neo-nazi march thru a public park with his mates dressed in matching outfits which evoked brownshirts and tactical gear. Not surprisingly they got in fights with other citizens and then the police. What did other Austrailians at the park think of this? 16 of his mates were arrested. Joel himself was arrested thereafter. Joel and other NS leaders were bumped off X, probably forever. Was this the outcome of Joel’s philosophy? Was it a positive result?
It’s also important to think about who Joel is as a person. I think he’s an extremist personality type. He really doesn’t seem to have a stable personality at all. He has bounced around from one personality to another over the last 10 years; first he was 4chan shitposter Joel, then he became polisy theorycell Joel, then came tradcath Joel, now we have neo-nazi gymbro Joel. But before any of that he was an actual antifa member. He didn’t just flirt with marxism like some young people do, he was an actual member and he really wasn’t just a member he was in a leadership position. What kind of person is this? How do normal people react to people like this?
I think while Joel’s outlook is not irrational it’s coming from a certain base of personality that isn’t good. I don’t think it’s a wise to follow someone like this or to subscribe to a philosophy like his. It’s probably going to lead you into something bad and counter-productive.

5
3
Hide replies

@filled_soda
6 months ago
I’ve heard him say that the Antifa thing was just a youthful blunder. Where can I read/watch more on this? I don’t mean that in a Leftist “Source?!” way. I’m genuinely curious.

1
0
Hide replies

@chambleth5
6 months ago
It’s hard to say it’s a youthful blunder when he was a leader of the group. As for sources; it’s just something i’ve heard multiple times from different people that’s been confirmed so i don’t have a link or anything.

Hide replies

@whitemonkey
6 months ago
who cares its just part of the journey, hitler and mussolini dabbled with communism ,so what. its all about the destination, joel found the correct place, however is just maybe a little to out there for me, still much respect to the man for sticking his neck out.

Clown World Gamer
6 months ago
If being arrested is enough to undermine legitimacy then we might as well all surrender. I don’t know what other Australians think about it, but I know you won’t be arrested because you’re not doing anything that bothers the enemy.

1
0
Hide replies

@chambleth5
6 months ago
Are those 16 young men more effective or less effective after having been arrested? Bothering the enemy is, right now, like a gnat bothering an elephant.

@whitemonkey
6 months ago
you point to brownshirt likeness, whoa, antifa get a pass?
joel is a little;e= too out there for me, however makes some fine points.
as for joels journey, doesnt matter how he got there ,he got there in the end.
its been said that hitler may have been a communist very early on as was mussolini however there joirney lead them to a real truth ,that being national socialism. which every nation should aspire to.
hitler in 6 years turned the nation around like no other never forget that.

1
0
Hide replies

@chambleth5
6 months ago
If a psychologically unsound person gets you to a certain place, maybe that place isn’t as psychologically sound as you think it is.

Hide replies

@whitemonkey
6 months ago
unsound?thats just an opinion, joel for me has evolved to a much clearer position now, many can see that,
life is a journey of experience ,we all make mistakes. am in my 60s though i make very few mistakes through a learning process there’s always another hurdle to clear in an ever evolving world.
your entitled your opinion ,i would fight for your right to express it also, however i believe you maybe wrong.
with respect.

2
0

@Scythe
5 months ago
Joel is a smart guy, but I think you’re right on what really drives him. He’s definitely an extremist personality type. Not to say he isn’t genuine, but he has a natural proclivity for this kind of thing.

@Six
6 months ago
its odd to pretend that national socialism is bad because its german centric…..during ww2 that is. its obviously not now, it just means racist. our enemies know what it means when they call us nazis

3
0
ThinRedLine
6 months ago(edited)
Third position(NS ) is not so much about the actual policies but about the end goals and the policies will be adapted to fit the end goals
it is kind of like the sophists debate with Aristoteles , for the Sophists the the form is more important than the morals and for aritoles the opposite

4
3

@Maligned
6 months ago
1:12:00
Joel just decimated Greg with his limp wristed ideology. How he cant see that his own limp wristed ideology that he is advocating for is the very reason why Whites are fucked in the first place. The only thing stopping Whites from rising is their own will to rise.

2
1
Long Knife
6 months ago
now upload your recent interview with Martinez, why not

1
2

@Willhelm
6 months ago(edited)
all this “white unity” and “no more brother wars” stuff is an american concept. communists, the democrats, russia and a lot of others are white and anti-white at the same time today. the allies pretty much were antifa back in the day.
looking at ww2 from gregs white american perspective is very shortsighted especially because the allies killed tons of “muh whites” as well. this all looks like a captain hindsight mixed with pacifism. horrible. honestly america can go to hell. i dont care for every white person around the world. thats stupid.

4
11
Hide replies
Based and Rempilled
6 months ago
The antiwhites grin at this

6
0

@hhhhwhitepill
6 months ago
“The only people who care about white collective interests are Americans. ‘No brother wars’ is a corny cliche because white men killed each other before. Also white liberals exist, therefore white collective interests are invalid. Some white people are bad- fuck those bad whites!” No offense, man…you’re really not cut out for this sort of thing.

2
3

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel: You are listening to Another Voice of Freedom broadcast financed through the free will donations of listeners like yourself. I’m Ernst Zundel, your host and moderator. The opinions expressed by our guests or in editorials and stories are always those of the originators. We believe that personal opinions freely expressed are not a danger to any democratic society. We don’t have to agree with any or all of the opinions expressed by others. We owe it to ourselves, however, to listen, to evaluate, and to possibly learn something new or different in the process. You may reach us at 206 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5A 2L1. Telephone 1492-29850 [Note: All contact details out of date].

 

And now we have another interesting program for you.

 

I’m Ernst Zundel with Another Voice of Freedom program. A number of our listeners from around the country, and some even as far away as Europe, have contacted us about our recent programs relating to D-Day and the period in Europe after D-Day, and some of our revisionist viewpoints that we hold on this topic. Well, some of them complained that I, in my programs had not spelled out in more detail what the Second World War was all about and how it came about.

 

So let me try to give it a layman’s overview. Nothing academic, just a layman’s overview. The Germans in the First World War were defeated by a coalition of forces, and the German government under the Weimar Republic was asked to sign a treaty in Versailles. And one of the stipulations of that treaty was that the Germans had to declare themselves solely responsible for the First World War.

 

And of course, with the loss of Germany’s territories in the east, coupled with this slap in the face for the entire German nation, who knew that they had not been solely responsible for this tragedy, which was the First World War. This meant there was a fertile soil for nationalists, or even extreme nationalists to agitate against the existing order of things.

 

Germany, you must understand, was under some form of Allied tutelage, was under military occupation in some regions. Germany was condemned to pay reparations, huge amounts of reparations which were to only run out in the year 1988! I want to repeat that these massive billions of dollars worth of gold marks of reparations the Germans were to pay to the Allies, were to be running till the year 1988. That was reparations the Germans had to pay for the First World War.

 

The reason why I’m stressing that is because, of course, it bankrupted the German nation, led to hyperinflation where people were paid three times a day, mornings, noon and night, because the money devalued between breakfast and lunch, sometimes by millions of marks!

 

And so when men were receiving their paycheck, they didn’t go and bring a wallet at the end of the week, they usually brought a basket.

 

And finally, some of the store and shop owners paid their people every single evening, because hyperinflation was running away with the currency in Germany.

 

My own mother, a very simple young girl, said that she worked for a whole month and at the end of the month, all she could buy with her earnings for that month in 1923, was a stamp with which to send a postcard to her parents. That is what the situation was!

 

In that situation, Adolf Hitler, a very gifted young orator in Germany, started his struggle for power. And he struggled against those who had signed this shameful treaty in Versailles and against those who had imposed it on Germany. And he found increasing resonance amongst the German population. At first the working people, finally an ever increasing number amongst Germany’s students, then amongst the more middle classes, and finally even amongst the intelligentsia, meaning Professors, doctors, dentists, lawyers and so on.

 

Then Adolf Hitler democratically moved into the Reichstag, and because his party was the party that had Garnered most votes in a coalition with other nationalist forces, finally became the government of Germany in 1933, on 30 January.

 

While Hitler was struggling for power, he had said over and over in thousands of speeches and talks and articles in his party newspaper and so on, and many of his Members of Parliament, the Reichstag at that time said to the German population:

 

“Understand that a vote for National Socialism does not mean a change of government in Germany.”

 

In other words, it’s not a change of administration. It’s not the Democrats being replaced by the Republicans, or in the Canadian context, the Liberals replacing the Conservatives. He said:

 

“What you are doing with this election, it is a plebiscite on which way Germany is going to go.”

 

In other words, there are going to be some fundamental changes in German society. And he had outlined them to the German population quite openly and quite freely, what he thought Germany should look like in the 1930s. The Germans were not sucked into or conned into voting for yet another politician who had made all kinds of promises that he wasn’t going to keep.

 

My own mother and my own father, who had been unemployed for four years by the time Adolf Hitler finally did come to power, said that they had tried the Conservatives, they had voted for the Catholic Party, the Christian Center Party, they had even voted for the Social Democratic Party. Other Germans, disgusted by all this party wrangling voted for the Communist Party.

 

And there was a polarization of political opinion and political action and the political spectrum in Germany in the 1930s between the extreme Left and, yes, the extreme nationalist Right.

 

Hitler represented the Right, the forces of the Right, and together with a number of smaller parties, finally did form the government, as I said. And he was hardly in power when an international boycott was called against Germany.

 

And the reason why I’m mentioning this is because in the next few programs, we are going to take a look exactly at what happened in “Nazi Germany”, the way the popular press calls it, or National Socialist Germany, in Hitler’s Germany after he came to power.

 

[07:46]

 

Let me just say to you that in studying this period of time, I found that Germany was in a terribly shocking state! And that, for instance, in the state of Thuringia, which is in the east, the budget for social welfare was two thirds of the state’s budget was eaten up by social welfare. Two thirds. You can imagine, that means so many people were unemployed, were on the dole, were half employed and so on. A state cannot function with this kind of budget. And so a crisis was looming large in Germany.

 

Also, the foreign currency reserves of Germany had gone down to such a level that when the German economics minister mentioned this to the new government, Hitler was alarmed. It was down to some 480 million marks, which, for a trading nation like Germany that depended on financing exports and so on, it was virtually the death knell. Germany was, to all intents and purposes, bankrupt!

 

How to get out of this situation was what dominated the mind of the new government. And during this particular time, there were rumors around the world that they were going to be preventive wars. There was going to be an invasion of Germany either by France or by Poland or by both governments.

 

Now, at the time, these two countries were, in a European context, superpowers. You must understand that the Treaty of Versailles condemned the German government to a force of professional soldiers of 100,000 people, just 100,000 men! That meant the entire German armed forces could fit into the Berlin soccer stadium.

 

Now, picture that. The Berlin soccer stadium. The only weapons that they had were machine guns. When they were practicing with tanks, they were bicycles with cardboard cutouts made to look like tanks. Because Germany was the only totally disarmed country and it was forced to disarm under the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler knew all this. In other words, he was in absolutely no position to threaten anybody! Others were threatening his government.

 

And suddenly there were these news from North America that the jewish community in North America was Calling for an international boycott against Germany! There was a man called Samuel Untermeyer, who had gone to Amsterdam for a conference. And when he returned to the United States, he gave a nationally broadcast radio program in which he called for a holy war against Germany, a national boycott.

 

And naturally, Hitler’s ambassadors and consular officials reported that back to Germany. So did the media. Hitler was alarmed! Here was the threat of military invasion, economic strangulation. Inside Germany the communists were restive. And so Hitler did what other German Chancellors had done before him, perfectly Democratic measure to call out some kind of an Emergency Measures Act. In Canada, we would call it the War Measures Act.

 

Into this period fell a fire that was started by apparently a communist, or a man with communist leadings called Van der Lubbe, who tried to burn down the Reichstag, meaning the German Parliament. Apparently as some kind of a note to other Leftists, to start simultaneously all over Germany similar activities and to try to have an overthrow of the German government.

 

Now, I know that in Allied propaganda, Hermann Goering is supposedly himself having carried a canister of gasoline through some secret tunnels into the Reichstag, and he’s supposed to have had a kind of a hand in burning down the Reichstag. Well, perfectly independent people and historical commissions and inquiries by independent historians during, before, during and after the war have come to the conclusion that, in effect, the Nazis did not torch the Reichstag! That it was a canard put out by communist and Leftist propaganda.

 

Hitler used this as his means of introducing draconian repressive measures inside Germany, outlawing political parties, political movements, arrest without habeas corpus and so on. It was a typical emergency measure act!

 

Now, I want you immediately to understand this is not to excuse Adolf Hitler and him breaking the civil rights of Germans. I am just trying to explain to you that this is nothing new in European history, certainly absolutely nothing new of the period. And in Canada, as late as 1972, we had what they called “the invoking of the War Measures Act”.

 

Actually, it was earlier still, during the FLQ crisis, the Front des Liberation Qui Pequoi, which was a Leftist group that was blowing up mailboxes, the stock market building and so on. And the Canadian government, in perfect peacetime, prosperous, not surrounded by enemies that were trying to invade our country here, imposed a War Measures Act. I lived there during the time in Quebec, and I can assure you here is what happened.

 

Hundreds, many, many, many hundreds of French-Canadian activists who had been politically vocal in wanting to have separation between Quebec and the rest of the country were rounded up at night. 4:00, 5:00, 3:00 o’clock in the morning. And they were arrested without any legal representation. They were put into sports arenas, meaning concentrated into the same kind of area that Hitler would take his dissidents and so on in the early 30s.

 

They were kept in there. Some of them were kept in jails in Canada without having the rights that we normally have to be brought before a judge speedily and so on, because the War Measures act had declared a national emergency, saying that there was imminent danger to the survival of Canada as a society and as a state. And then your civil rights went out the window.

 

Well, that’s exactly what happened to Germans in the Hitler era, as soon as Adolf Hitler came to power, because there was this perceived threat to the German state, the overthrow of the German government. And Hitler invoked what he called the Enabling Act, where he spelled out what his moves were going to be.

 

And so Germany, that moment, became somewhat of a dictatorship. True, there were elections and there were plebiscites later on, but ultimately, Hitler governed Germany under this kind of draconian enabling legislation, which allowed him to forbid parties and movements and seize newspapers, outlaw publishing houses and stuff like this, very much the way the West German state has been doing in the last six to seven months.

 

[15:26]

 

And again, Germany has no threat of invasion. Germany has no threat that the state is going to be overthrown. Yet the ruling clique in power in Germany says:

 

“Oh, we have got political dissidents here that are getting entirely too testy. They are having these big marches of 4, 5, 10,000 people. Our police forces can no longer control them, meaning they cannot cow them into silence. And even 10,000 policemen last fall could not prevent a march in honor of Rudolf Hess, for instance. And so therefore, we are going to pass this draconian legislation.”

 

Which they tried to do recently on the 20th of June with their what they call crime bill. But the German Parliament, at that time, the Upper House, at least voted down this draconian law.

 

Well, in Hitler’s Germany they did not, because National Socialism at that time, as I said, had the superior numbers. And so Germany began to rebuild under those measures with limited freedoms, restricted freedom of expression. And Hitler managed by all kinds of means, which we are going to cover in future programs, to prevent the invasion by France and by Poland, to prevent the boycott from crippling and destroying the German economy. And Adolf Hitler and his government went on and governed Germany in peace time for another six years.

 

And by the year 1936, we are able already to absorb all the millions and millions of unemployed in Germany and the surrounding countries. Two million people worked as guest workers in Germany in 1937 and 38, at a time when the rest of Europe was, and America, may I say, and Canada was still very much suffering under a depression!

 

Hitler’s Germany was like a beautifully tended garden surrounded by a bunch of gardens full of weeds.

 

And of course, the envy of the people who tilled the gardens, meaning the governments of the particular day, was rife everywhere! Not the people. For instance, Hitler had this program where he was going to [actually did] send hard working miners and farmers and so on these cruise ships to distant places in North Africa, in Egypt, in Greece or in Norway.

 

And it was such a hit with the working people of Europe that ordinary people could actually go on cruises that England forbade the landing of these German cruise ships in British ports! Because rather than giving their own working people such a break, they found it much easier just to restrict German ships from landing and not getting British workers envious.

 

What I’m saying to you is Hitler made Germany prosper! He made the trains run on time. Things hummed in Germany. Germany broke all kinds of records on the ground, in the air, with cars, with planes. National Socialist Germany in peacetime was a progressive, thriving country. And the people that lived there during that particular time apparently kind of allowed this restricted freedom that they couldn’t have different opinions and so on. They traded social security, financial security, bread and butter stuff over freedom.

 

It has always troubled me that that’s the way it was, but that’s the way it was. I personally am far more of a believer in individualism and freedom than that particular generation. But the Germans, after all, if the majority does rule by their majority, and by constantly reaffirming Hitler in power and his government decided that was the way they were perfectly willing to live, who am I to say in 1994 that they didn’t have the right to do that?

 

Now, why did the war break out? Because apparently Hitler was a sworn enemy of Marxism, Communism, then called Bolshevism. And Europe had these Bolshevik uprisings, especially in Hungary, Romania. Also in the east, especially in Russia, where a lot of blood was spilled, where hundreds of thousands, millions we know today, tens of millions of people were butchered in the most gruesome way, worked to death in the Gulag, worked to death while building canals through mosquito infested swamps and so on.

 

Today, now that the archives are open and the mass graves are being found in the Crimea and in the Ukraine and in Russia proper. Mass graves that hold 200, 240, 300,000 people and we have only just scratched the surface.

 

So the Bolsheviks who were in the east, armed to the teeth, had always said that they believed in world revolution and they were appealing to the workers around the world in uprising after uprising.

 

I know, I’ve got a book in my bookshelves here about a communist uprising in Brazil. Then we had the communist uprising in Spain. It was known at that time in Europe that communism was a huge threat to Western values and Western civilization.

 

Adolf Hitler was a strong opponent of Marxism. He considered it almost like an evil religion. And when President Ford, and later on much more so President Reagan and President Nixon before them had certain anti-communist statements made, President Reagan was the one that coined the phrase “the evil empire”. Well, let me tell you, Adolf Hitler had called Bolshevism and the Soviet Union “an evil empire” already in 1920s! And had initiated policies to contain the evil empire in the late 1930s. Making what he called the anti-Comintern pact with Italy, Japan and Germany.

 

[22:05]

 

And he also knew from his intelligence services that Russia [Soviet Union], armed to the teeth as they were, were pulling together troops at the Eastern border.

 

And so he knew that they were going to attack Germany and Western Europe. How did he know? Because the German armed forces and the German spy system against communism worked. They had lots and lots of ethnic Europeans in the east who were siding with the German government. And so their information was excellent!

 

But when Hitler finally ended up in this terrible tragedy with Poland, which France and England used as a declaration, as the reason for a declaration of war against Germany, Hitler knew that he had to quickly finish the continental powers in a kind of a pre-emptive quick strike in order to keep his back free, because he knew that the Soviet Union was arming and ready and rearing to go and invade Germany from the East. Germany didn’t have enough land, enough depth, geopolitically speaking, geographically speaking, to absorb the massive invasion forces which were then beginning to build up on her Eastern Frontier.

 

And so, luckily for Germany, France was subdued quickly, Holland and Belgium also. And Hitler could now turn his attention to the east. By now, his air force, using the very latest in technology, high altitude planes, quite similar to the later the very famous U2 spy planes which Francis Gary Powers used to fly over the Soviet Union. Hitler had similar planes, not quite as sophisticated, of course, but he could penetrate with his reconnaissance airplanes, flying at tremendously high altitudes for the first time using pressurized cabins, way into the heartland of Russia.

 

How do we know it? Because we have books about it. One man has been on my mailing list for three decades. His name is George Pemler. George Pemler, P E M L E R. He has written a book called, Der Flug zum Don, published by Drufel publishing house in Germany, in which he details and shows with all kinds of photographs the massive build-up of Soviet forces on the German border.

 

 

And so Hitler knew that he was not strong enough to just merely defend himself against Russia. And so they decided to pre-emptorily strike at the build-up of the Soviet forces very much the way Israel did in a repeat policy. And many people said, using a copycat plan against the Arab world in 1967 with exactly the same results. The Israelis attacked air fields in Egypt, in Syria and in other places, in Jordan, destroying the planes on the ground. They attacked missile batteries, destroying them on the ground.

 

And once they were silenced, then the ground forces, Israel’s tank forces, could sweep through the desert, driving the Arab forces before them into the desert. And ultimately Israel scored a stunning defeat in a very, very short war called the Six Day War.

 

Hitler’s forces did exactly the same thing in 1941 in the east. And the German air force that was opposed by over 14,000 Soviet planes knocked down over 12,500 planes or bombed them underground within the first two weeks of the war. The German air force at that time had less than 4,000 3,750 planes. The same could be said for ground forces, tank forces and so on. It was not German massive armor that won this. It was superior German generalship and planning. And also the elandes, the spirit of the German troops.

 

However, they were unable to deliver a knockout blow against the Soviet Union, which the world had expected. Basically, we know today because of treason in German ranks! Treason was the reason for Hitler not winning the war against the Soviet Union. And this is why Germany got stuck in the east!

 

And this is why these huge battles of attrition in Stalingrad, where over 300,000 German men marched into Stalingrad and where only 6,000 of them came back after the Second World War from Stalin’s Gulag. 96,000 prisoners were taken. About 90,000 of them vanished!

 

And you wonder why there were so few planes, so few troops, so few tanks in the West. Well, I tell you, they were in the east defending Europe, Western Europe against the Soviet onslaught, against the hordes of the evil empire, as President Reagan would have called it.

 

And so Europe’s men, we have to remember that, the Hungarians, the Slovakians, the many Polish volunteers, Ukrainian volunteers, Danish, Dutch volunteers. Alone in Denmark, four times as many people were serving in the SS in the German armed forces of Danish nationality than were serving in the Danish armed forces and police! This is an incredible statistic which very few people know.

 

[See: The Epic Story of the Waffen SS – Leon Degrelle]

 

So Hitler’s Germany was defending Europe’s interest in the east. And this is why the Allies had such an easy time in the West. This is why the there were only 270 operational tanks and only 375 planes to meet the Allies’ 12,000 planes in the West. They were bleeding to death in the east for Europe. And so look at it in the context of a German or of Germany. The Germans defended Europe and European style civilization against Soviet Bolshevism.

 

And so this was the reason that I should have given you before we went into Normandy.

 

However, the next series of programs that you’re going to hear have to do largely with Israel and German jewish relations. And I think it is timely because very, very little has been said about this period in history and the German side of it.

 

I am Ernst Zundel speaking for The Voice of Freedom. Yes, I am a son of the Germans using the facilities of North American radio stations and the freedom guaranteed to me by the United States, Constitution, by the Canadian Bill of Rights, or the other way around, to bring you dissident or different information. And all I’m asking you is. You don’t have to believe me. Just open up your mind to our German viewpoint and our Germans.

 

We are located at 206 Carlton street in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Our postal code is M5A 2L1. Our telephone 416-922-9850 [Note: All contact details out of date]. Thank you very much.

 

Ernst Zundel here thanking you for your support.

 

[29:34]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/2/2025 = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 04 with Oscar – Jul 20, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 09 with Grace Eki Oyama – Aug 24, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 20 with Kathleen Dudley – Nov 16, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 24 – Prof Tony Hall – Dec 21, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 27 – Germar Rudolf – Jan 18, 2025 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 36 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zundel – Mar 22, 2025

 

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 36 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zundel – Mar 22, 2025 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – Another Voice of Freedom Radio – Why World War II Started – 1994 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – 1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics 1 – Transcript

Ernst Zundel – 1967-68 Radio Shows in Montreal Discussing Israel and Jewish Topics 2 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979

An Open Letter to New Jersey’s Governor

Historians or Hoaxers?

House of Orwell

Misha: Surviving with Wolves or …

Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

The Plum Cake

 

 

 

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

Powers and Principalities XI – Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra, Holocaust Revisionism — TRANSCRIPT

Tales of the Holohoax – A Historian’s Assessment – Part 1

The Holocaust Lie — Made in America

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained — TRANSCRIPT

Jim Rizoli Interviews Prof Robert Faurisson, Oct 2015 — TRANSCRIPT

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Inside Auschwitz – You’ve never seen THIS before! — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!

AUSCHWITZ – A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen

Jim Rizoli Interviews Bradley Smith — TRANSCRIPT

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Ingrid Carlqvist – Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Carolyn Yeager on Johnson vs Anglin debate — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/29/2024 = 323)

volkhero
3 days ago
Love and gratitude from the States.
Heil Hitler and 14 Words.

9
0
Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
Great Work Thomas.. we appreciate you. wfp

8
0

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
fake n gay. Holocaust never happened

5
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
based

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Yes your spot on o/. sorry im quite new to your content to be honest

4
0
Hide replies
MajesticCasual
1 hour ago
I’d say Thomas Sewell,Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell, Warren Balogh [Warstrike with Eric Striker], Weston Paradigm, Just Joe Radio, White Rabbit Radio, Mark Collett etc.. Also Nordic Frontier lads [recently labeled terrorists byt the Judeo-terrorists who occupy the USA gov state dept, so they were banned but they are wholesome, non-violent,patriots and can still be found on Rumble temporary and Telegram, or maybe their website directly]
https://t.me/NordicFrontierPodcast
https://t.me/nordicresistancemovement
https://nordicresistancemovement.org
I’m sure I’m missing some but I work outside 6-7 days a week so I put all these guys streams on rotation and don’t disagree much with any of them. They all have their own style so it’s a well-rounded lineup if you have headphones on 50-60 hours a week.

@Mike
2 days ago
Tom, I’m watching a couple of days late in Canada so you probably won’t read this, but this is great content, there isn’t enough commentary on life through a natsoc lense and i want to see and hear more.

3
0
Hide replies
Nightcrawler
15 hours ago
Hey, I’m from the east coast of Canada. O/
Good to see other Canadians here.

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Absolutley. thanks o/

3
0
Harry Holler
3 days ago
Jesus tells you to spread the other cheek

5
2
Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@Lebensraum
—

3
0
Hide replies
SkoolafIsh
3 days ago
Walther – I appreciate that you are always so consistently and comprehensively ahead of the curve. Tremendous channel – still working through to download.

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
the main thing people need too do is stop eating the poisoned commercial foods and drinking fluoride water…eat clean it will change your life

2
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Wise.

1
0

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago

@WaltherMauser
lol

1
0
The Governess
3 days ago
the magic is so real, watching normies do mental gymnastics around the JQ is just amazing. most normies don’t even know a jew or has knowingly met one before but will defend them to the death it seems

2
0
Karl Hakenkreuz
3 days ago
It’s the holocaust conspiracy theory

2
0

@Gullaldr
3 days ago
Isn’t kind of ironic Buddhism is actually an Aryan religion and is categorized as Eastern whilst the semitic religions are viewed as Western, it’s an inversion

2
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
The Doctrine of Awakening is not the same as Buddhism. Read more.

Muh Fashy Bookshelf
2 days ago
Tom, Hitler was a Catholic. Catholicism is technically a European religion.

0
1
Fancy
2 days ago
DAY OF THE ROPE IS COMING

1
0

@Moonman
3 days ago
o/

1
0

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 days ago

@WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
thank you. it’s an honor. he does the heavy lifting. best, Penelope

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
Active Club here in Canada is growing. We have big plans

1
0
Hide replies
Hobo TV
3 days ago(edited)
this is good, but I’m sad I’m at the age that I’m probably not going to be accepted
need an organization for tribe and train that accepts those of us in the 40 years range. DM me on telegram if you can help.

Callaghan
3 days ago
WHITE POWER CHAPTERS are popping up everywhere

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Thanks o/

1
0

@sparkofspirit
3 days ago
thanks thomas o/

1
0
𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@DOLO
ahh man. he should hve one even if to just take questions. I know he’s not interested in being a pro streamer, but getting a few extra bucks can always be thrown towards his org’s activities

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago
I can tell your a great speaker and know how to be an authority etc. Ive been researching Psy-Ops alot lately like CIA/RAND documents and stuff. very interesting.

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
o/

1
0
Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
the Jbolshevik communists took over America 1913 then used the power of the dollar too spread communism world wide

1
0
𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
Hence why the (((gov))) and (((ASIO))) is terrified of your organization Thomas

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Have you studied psychological behavioral influence, suggestion and persuasion as a political/propaganda tool? I think it is very valuable, considering we dont use it like the jews do but fight fire with fore so to speak.

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago

@drifthamlet
I could even see him being a leader of something like a World Aryan Congress to combat the World Jewish Congress \o

1
0
Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
if we cant take over or remove the corrupt system politically that does not leave many other choices.

1
0

@drifthamlet
3 days ago

@Esau
Tom has the potential to be Australia’s Hitler

1
0
Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
Hello/ Tommy first time Catching you Live

1
0
PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
First time chatter. Thank you for all your work and dedication. You are one of our strongest leaders and an inspiration o/

1
0
Hide replies
SkoolafIsh
3 days ago
Hello Pavlov – I am just catching up on this terrific replay myself

1
0

@Esau
3 days ago
I wish we had a Thomas Sewell clone here in Canada. Our NS scene is utterly lacking.

1
0
Love & Division
3 days ago

@HarryHoller
Practically speaking that’s true. The God of the Jews is Satan

1
0

@Lebensraum
3 days ago
Great points all.

1
0

@david_smith
3 days ago
I think Trump only cares about himself, I don’t think he is loyal to anyone, just controlled to a significant extent.

1
0
AMALEK INTERNATIONAL
3 days ago
Trump has been an owned asset since his 1990s bankruptcy. The banks’ (jewish) lawyer said it plainly: “We made the decision that he would be worth more to us alive than dead…dead meaning in bankruptcy. We don’t want him to be a bankruptcy, we want him out in the world selling these assets for us”

1
0
Dillinger
3 days ago
Well Trump’s family are jews now, so he is ostensibly a jew himself; since his children haven’t married Gentiles

1
0
Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@TaderWaffen
Heard miriam adelson wants a ‘book of trump’ put in the bible. She can afford to have it done. lol

1
0
Wizard in the Woods
3 days ago
If you’ve read classical Greek philosophy, you realize they were dealing with the same shit as now. Plato’s popular work is literally called The Republic.

1
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
External conditions are the output of an internal chemistry. Plato was smarter than you as yet know. Pearls —> swine.

Show reply

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
without holywood and the media trump would be just another real estate mogul

1
0

@xero
3 days ago

@WaltherMauser
I think he already fucked off back to his Hasan piker stream

1
0
Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@ScottRousell
Plenty of side show entertainment channels you can go check out

1
0
Dillinger
3 days ago
It’s good that Tom’s addressing these topics

1
0

@CampsLindburgh
3 days ago
gov’t owes jews money

1
0
Logos
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
do you think the hit on Trump was genuine or staged fake and ghay? or somewhat both

1
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Boys will be boys.

Operation Werewolf
3 days ago
we are living through the greatest selection event in 1000 years. those that survive this generation will be worthy of being called Aryan. will will loose all of our dysgenic waste. see you on the other side boys

1
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Time is your brain’s explanation for fear. Release fear to “release time”.

@jbc77
3 days ago
Great discussion Thomas. Wishing you the best from the U.S

1
0
The Governess
3 days ago
some can’t learn anything without making mistakes, not everyone learns from others mistakes

1
0
Wizard in the Woods
3 days ago
Nature is at scale. Lessons / morality can be learned by observing other parts of nature interacting. What happens to the bug can happy to you. There are laws of nature.

1
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
It could be more accurate to say nature has an Order rather than laws. Man makes laws. Order makes man (through nature).

Show reply

@Gullaldr
3 days ago
Wow, What a synchronicity, I just finished watching your Elijah Schaffer interview and now I see you’re live here, Thank you for all you do Thomas and much love and well wishes from here in northern Sweden 14

1
0
Wizard in the Woods
3 days ago
Paganism is the witnessing of the divine force in nature playing out through all of its parts. There’s a reason the old religions believed this because we constantly lived in nature observing it. Modernity has separated us from nature, so it’s hard to have these experiences and relate

1
0

@xero
3 days ago
This should be an interesting one, Toms got based takes on religious concepts

1
0
Who Said That?
3 days ago
By what standard do you call yourself Aryan? Have you considered all history is myth, rather than “reality”?

0
4
Hide replies
Thomas Sewell
2 days ago
you make no sense.

2
0
Hide replies
Who Said That?
2 days ago
Thank you for your response. I will clarify that Aryan is a term that should be used for more than just genetics. There is a certain inner character which must be proven before the bestowment of title

Show reply
White Community
2 days ago
good analysis
Jewish god and Aryan god
Aryans really need to study and understand Jews in order to free themselves

@Jim
3 days ago
Somebody pls inform Tom that Stalin wasn’t Russian, Jugashvili “Stalin” wasn’t even White

Hide replies
Thomas Sewell
2 days ago
I know, the point still stands.

2
0
Hide replies

@Jim
2 days ago
Thanks. BTW, overall, very inspirational high-octane stuff, thank you.

White_Wolf
3 days ago
Rabbi Yeshuah is no god of White men either.

Reclaim
3 days ago
Tom has so much wisdom for being a relatively young man o/

Hobo TV
3 days ago
Hail total White Victory!

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
How do you expect that to happen? You are outnumbered.

0
2
Hide replies
Hobo TV
1 day ago
We will show you. soon.

1
0
Matt Hammond
3 days ago
I had to put my serious hat on for this.

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@Esau
no, not tonight

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
o/

Vivian
3 days ago
tanklin, stack, then nnr o/ see ya

Callaghan
3 days ago
Devon Stack after party at Nicks

Heeb Watch
3 days ago
\o

@Esau
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
You going live tonight, brother?

Doomsayer
3 days ago
o/

Callaghan
3 days ago

@Esau
WHITE POWER

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Prove it with intelligence rather than intensity.

0
1
Hide replies
Callaghan
3 days ago
0/

Hide replies
Who Said That?
2 days ago
The symbol of the Aryan Elite is the mark of immobility, the Swastika.

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
you’re very kind. lovely, thanks so much. P.

@david_smith
3 days ago

@DawnBrowning
chlorine is bad for soil life, so best avoided or let it evaporate before watering plants

@Esau
3 days ago
Blood and Honor. Heil Tom. Heil

@Aryanity

Kal
3 days ago
0/

@PaganBear
3 days ago
o/

WFP!
3 days ago
Heil

Karl Hakenkreuz
3 days ago
Thanks Tom o/

Dawn Browning
3 days ago

@david_smith
I do on homegrown veggies.

DOLO
3 days ago
o/

@Azroc
3 days ago
cya

WFP!
3 days ago

@ssanwaerter
3 days ago
0/

JQRcode
3 days ago
O/

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
o/

@Dangbot
3 days ago
seeya

@david_smith
3 days ago

@DawnBrowning
I doubt it would be a problem, use rainwater if you can.

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Southernfryd
this is what I was getting at with the psych/influence stuff. There are certain techniques for different types of people and situations

Dawn Browning
3 days ago

@KiowaRenegade
I’m also looking for info if flouride accumulates in vegetables & meat via town water

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago
Power brings freedom too

Callaghan
3 days ago
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NSG5gV3Prhgu

Vivian
3 days ago
very well said

@david_smith
3 days ago
rational centrism

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago
“politically applied biology”

@Southernfryd
3 days ago
Tom how would explain the worldview to a normie

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Very good question here.

Callaghan
3 days ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
Huge support on Marks show

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
I haven’t turned up anything on entropy itself nor his telegram. Will check rumble too

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
chicken fish steak veggies rice and fruits..stop eating sugar

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago

@david_smith
i bet he advanced to the raw meat carnivore diet but didnt announce it

@david_smith
3 days ago
Being a vegetarian creates more gas

Saxon Dawn
3 days ago
Someone mentioned joining an AC in Michigan. The FRM has an AC in Michigan The Sons of Hengist we are recruiting reach out to me if your interested. We have AC’s around the country.

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
many thanks, P.

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@DawnBrowning
i distill

Dawn Browning
3 days ago

@KiowaRenegade
What water filter do you use?

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
I don’t think so, but i’ll check entropy itself and his telegram and see if there’s a link there. just a min

@david_smith
3 days ago
White people are the primary force fixing the environment

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
…And the primary force behind grievous loss of life in the whole civilized world. Think about it.

0
2
Hide replies

@david_smith
3 days ago
You are a gay anti-White.

Hide replies
Who Said That?
2 days ago
The environment can’t be fixed. Work on your self, gayboy.

@david_smith
3 days ago
We? got a pajeet or Chinaman in your pocket?

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
salient question, thanks for asking. I’d love to know. best, Penelope

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago
Im not promoting being manipulative in a bad way of course, but some people need tricked into doing whats right for them

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
You have potential.

1
0

@david_smith
3 days ago
Anxiety = thinking about the future

@Hierophant
3 days ago
the parts of your brain responsible for anxiety also light up with thankfulness. Philippians 4:6-7 talks about this

Hide replies
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Excellent reference. The passage only gets better after this too. Don’t settle for mere belief and faith. Pursue understanding.

1
0
Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
whats your thoughts on stew peters? he was going ham for a while…

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago

@KiowaRenegade
in msm? the ex-dailywire negress probably

TheOpenRoad
3 days ago

@Mr_White_Tuber

DOLO
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
I don’t think so.

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
who does everyone consider the main person outing the subversive juws right now in msm??

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
does Thomas have an entropy or something chat?

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago
aye the fightin risih are rising

The Pork Report
3 days ago
Yes, Ireland

@Esau
3 days ago
^

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
dasjuden is turning American into a third world shithole by flooding us with millions shitskins

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago
nothing changes until the fed Res is taken from their greedy rubbing hands

@ssanwaerter
3 days ago
What was the deal with Hitler’s vegetarianism? i can understand the sympathy for animals and was myself a vegetarian for about a year, But it seems like something impractical for a society at large. HH.

Hide replies
Frederick the Hate
3 days ago
He wasn’t a vegetarian for just ethical reasons or pity for animals. He believed there were health benefits to a vegetarian diet. He, of course, also did not impose his diet on the nation… lol. HH

1
0
Who Said That?
3 days ago
Vegetarianism is a form of Ascetic practice common among monks. This is more likely than the alternative of shortage of meat. Most likely it was a personal sacrifice he made for a specific purpose.

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
yea good point. you only have one brain and its delicate. Train defensive movement, big time. Mike Tyson was the best at it, once you get the basics down in the gym study his drills and fights

@Wolnir

Whiteflower
3 days ago
:shushing:

Whiteflower
3 days ago
^^

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@Wolloms
haha

@Esau
3 days ago

@Vardhan945
I agree that the US is the hub of ZOG especially militarily but our revolution needs to be a global aryan revolution so that the jews don’t create an intra-NATO war to stamp out the revolution.

Wolloms
3 days ago

@KiowaRenegade
Yeah im sure biden was out boxing several times a week….

Wolloms
3 days ago

@Wolnir
Its a good skill, and its fun. Your best bet is a gym, once a week with a AC is good but not really enough to develop skills in it.

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@Wolnir
you can train but taking constant blows too your head will make you slow someday…look at our leader biden brain dead head

@IanSnawp
3 days ago
i have wasted years of dedication scribbling on walls…i am ready to use the same determination into something more productive

Whiteflower
3 days ago
what a time to be alive

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago

@Wolnir
Find an mma gym

Wolnir
3 days ago
I want to fight it feels good

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@Wolnir
go to the range instead

DOLO
3 days ago

@Wolnir
Join a gym

Wolnir
3 days ago
if i dont have a nat soc to teach me boxing whats the best way to learn

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
you are correct sir again

@IanSnawp
3 days ago
i am always keen for a trek…nowhere within sydney is too far for me, thanks

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
when your org is big, and everywhere, that’s when it starts to threaten jewish power

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago
^fire

@Thad88
3 days ago
NSN Darwin

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@Vardhan945
its not a U.S. Gov and yes you are correct. They use the FiB to infiltrate and make up crimes on any group that tries too collectivize

@IanSnawp
3 days ago
i am messaging the bot now…thanks thomas and thad

Whiteflower
3 days ago
nice

@Thad88
3 days ago
on telegram as well

@Vardhan945
3 days ago
Joel once stated any WN movement that succeeds in getting power would be crushed by the US Govt, so our race depends on American WNs seizing power. Do you agree? I’ve tried activism here in Michigan and it’s sometimes feel like a uphill battle and we’re failing our kin across the West

@Thad88
3 days ago
on telegram

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@Esau
I like the way you think mister

@IanSnawp
3 days ago

@Thad88
i thought they were based in victoria…ill try messsging eam on telegram, thanks

Kiowa Renegade
3 days ago

@drifthamlet
i vote for Goose SStomping

@Thad88
3 days ago

@IanSnawp
yea, NSN and EAM

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago
parrot mountains?

@IanSnawp
3 days ago
is there a group near parramtta???

Wolnir
3 days ago
what do you think the next step after active clubs is

@Esau
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
I agree. Active Clubs seem to be the best option in Canada right now. We have some big plans in the works.

@Esau
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
I wish them well but they ultimately are not NS and they allow non-whites at their VIP events.

@david_smith
3 days ago

@Esau
Not a fan of Diagolon?

PavlovPuppy
3 days ago
o/

Spartan_Sardaukar
3 days ago
Words and stories shape reality. Real and fictional ones. Fiction is what fuels future inventions, people imagined planes before fully building them.

@Esau
3 days ago
What’s up my Aryan brothers and sisters? Greetings from Canada.

@drifthamlet
3 days ago
WN is exploding on Twitter right now. It’s incredible. Even mainstream guys like Anthony Cumia are promoting it.

Dillinger
3 days ago
Don’t you think that “give them bread and circuses” is a simple solution?… Obviously the jews do not want White European Gentiles to have influence in the production of films and tv…

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
turkey has replica of that trojan horse

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago
the old cunning linguist

@drifthamlet
3 days ago
Tom if you saw a black woman being attacked, would you help her?

@GaelicNord
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Have you ever read about Roman rituals? theres 1 called evocatio deorum that basically invited foreign gods of racial foreigners that they defeated in battle back to rome. perhaps to increase their power levels. i believe they made a big mistake in inviting the jewish god back.

Lifting_Lion
3 days ago
I’m just listening while I work. earphone in and getting my work done. cheers.

@ReturnToHyperborea
3 days ago
have you seen what handsome truth has been up to lately?

AMALEK INTERNATIONAL
3 days ago

@Mindmyriad
But only 10-15% of the nation is habitable

@Hierophant
3 days ago
chastisement. happens to me

Heeb Watch
3 days ago
I think many people focus so heavily on demographics when looking for a place to purchase land/home that they overlook density. Australia has amazing population density. 27 million on the entire continent

Callaghan
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
be great if you could get Jason & Mark on

Love & Division
3 days ago
Be careful you don’t get dragged into a David Koresh situation.

Based Chungus
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Any tips for or rants on the schizomaxxing archetypes? I feel like you tone down your third eye a lot on streams lol…trump’s right ear….

@Hierophant
3 days ago
o/

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
o/

Dillinger
3 days ago
One of the most unfortunate things about Hitler is that although he was a great wartime leader, his true talent was at running a great country, creating peace

@david_smith
3 days ago
I woke up a around 4am

Whiteflower
3 days ago
Are Whites waking up in Australia

Whiteflower
3 days ago
Foreigners out!

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
sure seems like it, their god certain seems demonic

Wolnir
3 days ago
what advice would you give to help with expanding a smaller org

Heeb Watch
3 days ago
If you live in the states and want to get a trade skill, look into the WIOA grant. I got it to pay for my whole trade school plus $500 dollars for work clothes.

@ReturnToHyperborea
3 days ago
Have you seen what Handsome truth has been up to lately?

Dillinger
3 days ago
I tried contacting NS13 in Ontario, got no response

@Thad88
3 days ago
most people dont get doxxed if they take basic opsec precautions

Rebellious Goy
3 days ago
based boss

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
o/

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
they doxxed too may people

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
yea, doxxing doesn’t do what it used to

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
based

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago

@theopenroad
o/

Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@david_smith
Who would dare strike a god king, yo!

TheOpenRoad
3 days ago

@NightNationReview
o/

@david_smith
3 days ago
It is kind of odd that some people believe nobody would conspire to kill Trump.

J5
3 days ago
yeah that was a great interview with Elijah. sent that to alot of people.

Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@warren-g
Pragmatic realpolitik

Dillinger
3 days ago

@tmp357
The right ear thing was at the least an interesting coincidence

Anonymous Goy
3 days ago
o/

TheOpenRoad
3 days ago
I was watching

@All-I’m-Sayin’
. He interviewed Thomas awhile ago. Does a good current events show

FakeTaswegian
3 days ago

@warren-g
Not sure as to why but they wouldnt have allowed any ,eaningful amount to move to germany.

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
3 days ago
o/

Based Chungus
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Any tips for or rants on the schizomaxxing archetypes? I feel like you tone down your third eye a lot on streams lol…trump’s right ear….

warren-g
3 days ago

@FakeTaswegian
i wonder why the germans were so buddy buddy with muslims…they were doing it in the first world war..perhaps it was “enemy of my enemy” thing

@david_smith
3 days ago

@theopenroad
lol i figured that

FakeTaswegian
3 days ago
That being said im sure the original muslims like the old persians and hindus were not like the current ones.

TheOpenRoad
3 days ago

@david_smith
I meant to post that in another chat…

Dillinger
3 days ago
Yeah, Rudolf Hess was treated with no dignity

Callaghan
3 days ago

@LoveandDivision
Dr Jim Wickstrom was right

FakeTaswegian
3 days ago
Just because Hitler said nice things about certain muslim practices doesnt mean anything admirable is coming from its adherents today.

@Thad88
3 days ago

@HarryHoller
:neutral_face:

@david_smith
3 days ago

@theopenroad
Thanks for the heads up mate

Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@Lebensraum
\o

Harry Holler
3 days ago
Jews are our god in the West

@Lebensraum
3 days ago

@WaltherMauser
Its all good, i appreciate the effort Brother

Av’it
3 days ago
Jesus also talks about the coming man in “The parable of the Tenants’ to the High Priests and Pharisees.

TheOpenRoad
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell is Live

@david_smith
3 days ago
God does nothing, you have to do it.

@Lebensraum
3 days ago

@Mindmyriad
Good Evening o/

Walther Mauser
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
lol, beat me to it

@Lebensraum
3 days ago
Walther

@Lebensraum
3 days ago

@WaltherMauser
Thanks Walter !

Heeb Watch
3 days ago
Evening from Denver, CO Chat & Sewell \o

@Lebensraum
3 days ago
Your not boring if you got a few braincells to rub together, and some will to power

@drifthamlet
3 days ago
Tom needs to to another episode of Racist Couch

@drifthamlet
3 days ago
Pisslam

@Lebensraum
3 days ago

@fantastic_journey
Thankyou. Appreciate it

@jbc77
3 days ago
the talk has been outstanding.

@Lebensraum
3 days ago
Is Toms interview with Schaefer only on Rumble errr? Cant find it on Schaefers channel here

Wizard in the Woods
3 days ago
Tabula Rasa – blank slate. People are covered with beliefs and ideas that they’ve picked up like a nasty windshield filled with bugs. Enlightenment is an unprogramming. That’s the child-like state of truth.

@Nemo
3 days ago
You have to add a bank account to your Odysee account in order to receive donations. Odysee has very low fees compared to other livestream platforms.

WaffleStake
3 days ago
you can still trade them on some exchanges?

@Nemo
3 days ago
Those Odysee LBC tokens are completely worthless since being shut down by the (((US Securities Exchange Commission)))

@Thad88
3 days ago
:blind:

@Thad88
3 days ago

@aMan
being gay and Blue Orbital is moron

@Nathan_Swindon
3 days ago
Rumble maybe

@drifthamlet
3 days ago
Hail Sewell

Harry Holler
3 days ago

@aMan
100%

Blue Orbital
3 days ago
being a christian and against jewish power is a oxymoron

Harry Holler
3 days ago
“Because muh Jeebus was a jew too”

Walther Mauser
3 days ago
Bad Tölz Junkerschulen type streams are the best.

Harry Holler
3 days ago
That Elijah Schaffer interview was a godike performance, Thomas.

Av’it
3 days ago
Better is the little that the righteous has
than the abundance of many wicked.
17 For ythe arms of the wicked shall be broken,
but the LORD zupholds the righteous.

Dillinger
3 days ago
Near death experiences

Harry Holler
3 days ago
Come on, follow Jesus, and just spread the other cheek when the jews fuvk you over

Harry Holler
3 days ago
Lol. Thank you.

Wizard in the Woods
3 days ago
Welcome to the higher IQ chat

Harry Holler
3 days ago
goddamn. Red Ice was boring the shot out of me

AMALEK INTERNATIONAL
3 days ago
It goes all the way back to Cro-Magnon VS. Neanderthal. Jews have high levels of neanderthal admixture; they are the descendants of the human-neanderthal hybrids discovered in Israel:
https://forward.com/culture/434525/evidence-of-human-neanderthal-hybrids-found-in-israeli-cave/

@CampsLindburgh
3 days ago
heaven is true, beautiful and good

Dillinger
3 days ago
Varg’s belief is basically reincarnation, but only if you mate within your own race

AMALEK INTERNATIONAL
3 days ago

@Spikeedgecrusher
Yes; Trump will just put the normiecons back to sleep. Kabala Harris and her Jewish husband would be the best strategic choice for 3rd positionists

@Spikeedgecrusher
3 days ago
I personally want Trump to lose. I want White Americans to realize that no one is coming to save them, demographics are destiny, and non whites are voting against them based on race. I don’t think his assassination would have lead directly to a civil war but soead up the process

@Dangbot
3 days ago
cool

@WhiteWalker
3 days ago
They need the White representation so they will fight for Israel, thats it.

FakeTaswegian
3 days ago
Whats odd about muslims and indians. Is that islam talks about certain health rules and wrestling and the hindu gods are portayed as these jakced warriors, but every muslim & indian in melbourne is lanky or fat.

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
jews have propoed up trump to all ends

@xero
3 days ago
ghandi was a fag

Dillinger
3 days ago
Low barrier to entry for islam…

The Pork Report
3 days ago
LOL

Walther Mauser
3 days ago
lol

@Yaschenkoi
3 days ago

@Yaschenkoi
3 days ago
are you religious, Tom?

My Awesome Channel
3 days ago
this is the most boring content I have ever seen

@xero
3 days ago
remember to conserve your vril/seed bros

W.W.C.M.
3 days ago
Superorganism

Based Chungus
3 days ago

@Thomas_Sewell
Any tips for or rants on the schizomaxxing archetypes? I feel like you tone down your third eye a lot on streams lol…trump’s right ear….

@ringeringeraja
3 days ago
mass deportations to africa asap

@xero
3 days ago
who would win: every top ‘intellectual’ in the West vs 1 aussie construction worker?

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago

@tbs12345678
im sure he has other social media that you can reech out, but to be honest ive never seen Sewell live like other guys

Operation Werewolf
3 days ago

@TaderWaffen
is ther any otherway?

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
its possible that hees not seeking donations

The Governess
3 days ago

@tbs12345678
looks to be disabled

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago

@tbs12345678
it says only creators with verified cash accounts.

Operation Werewolf
3 days ago
Can anyone else not donate to this page?

Callaghan
3 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

Boomer Nerd
3 days ago
[Isa 3:12 KJV][as for] my people, children [are] their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause [thee] to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

@CampsLindburgh
3 days ago
if your society’s norms/morals run counter to nature, it’ll be enslaved and gang raped by a society with norms that are in concordance with nature

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
terrible

@Littledrummergoy
3 days ago
HH and I don’t mean the WWF

The Governess
3 days ago
o/

@ringeringeraja
3 days ago
good evening, brothers

@Nathan_Swindon
3 days ago
Listening on a forklift o/

MajesticCasual
3 days ago
o/

@polarbeard
3 days ago
o/

W.W.C.M.
3 days ago
88 o/

@rat88
3 days ago
o/

@TaderWaffen
3 days ago
fuck niggers and jews

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 267. And I’m here tonight with lots of people. This isn’t a regular episode, it is our election special, so we’ve got an entire panel who I’ll be introducing shortly. I’m going to try and keep my intro to an absolute minimum. We’re obviously live on Odysee, we’re live on Rumble, we’re live on DLive, and we’re live on Entropy.

 

I will be back on Friday. I’ve got a pre-recorded video about how it’s actually us, the people who are genuine ethno-nationalists, that have influenced the election in more ways than one and forced Farage into adopting our talking points. Look out for that Friday. I’ll also be back for a special stream with my brother from another mother, aka Natty, on Sunday, but we’ll discuss that later at the end. Please do consider making a small donation towards this show if you enjoy the work I do, if you value the fact we’re putting forward general election candidates, if you like all of the other bits and pieces that I do on a regular basis, please consider donating via Odysee or Entropy.

 

Remember, none of my work goes behind a paywall. Everything is free. All of the streams you can watch anytime, anywhere. You can even download my book for free. You can also donate by crypto-currency. All the crypto links are in the description below. That’s on Odysee, that’s on Rumble, and that’s on replay over on BitChute.

 

If you’re watching there, please consider donating via crypto if you want to be more anonymous.

 

And finally, you can download my book for free, which is at www.thefallofwesternman.com and you can write to me at Mark I think that’s the quickest intro I ever did. Less than two minutes. Let’s get into it. We’ve got three people here.

 

I’m just going to describe them all to the best of my ability. We have Natty, who is a very good friend of mine. Myself and Natty, we like gaming together. He has great political takes. He was obviously somebody who was a leading groyper back in the day. I’ve met this guy on numerous occasions. He is a wonderful man. He is a father, he is a nationalist, he’s a role model. He’s also a great speaker. We’ve got Tollah is another very good friend of mine. He’s been here from the start. Former host of TASOB [The Absolute State Of Britain] of he now has a couple of awesome shows of his own. He is a comedian. He’s a man who gives absolutely wonderful advice on how to deal with belligerent women. A hero to us all, I would say.

 

And finally, we’ve got David Clews, the media mogul of the group. David is another man I’m proud to call a friend. He is the host and owner of Unity News Network. He shows an absolute fire. I enjoy watching them. And if the family are out on a Saturday or Sunday, and David’s doing one of those all afternoon streams, there’s nothing better to dip into. He’s a scholar, a gentleman, and I get on really well with him, too.

 

And of course, he’s also a family man.

 

So let’s get into it, guys. I’ve done the intros, everything’s out the way in three minutes. That’s never been done before.

 

So let’s get into this, because it’s about the general election.

 

I was going to do it maybe next week. I didn’t want to do it on the eve of the election, but I think so much stuff has happened that it was worthy doing it tonight. And we’ll go around the group, always starting with Natty. We’ll try and keep our answers short.

 

And let’s start with the big question very briefly, what are your predictions for the outcome of this election? And obviously, we’re going to talk about the big parties, talk about Reform. Also mention our friend George Galloway, who we’ll speak about later because he’s in the middle of suing Hope Not Hate, apparently, which is very interesting. But what are your predictions, Natty?

 

Natty: Labour win. Farage takes a few seats, Tories hopefully lose a lot and end up with very, very few seats, but get humiliated by Reform. Labour government may be the biggest, biggest number of seats in a very long time, so that very, very, basically, that’s my prediction for it. I’m pretty sure that’s pretty standard. I don’t know if anyone’s got any in from the left field ideas, but I’m pretty sure that’s what’s going to happen.

 

Mark Collett: Well, not to butt in, mate, but very quickly, if you were to predict, I’m not saying down to the last seat, but predict roughly how many seats Labour will get. What’s your prediction?

 

Natty: 570. Is it something like that? I think that’s probably about right. 570.

 

Mark Collett: Wow!

 

Natty: I don’t know if there’s going to be some Green seats. I know people always talk about alliances. The thing is, when you’re this close to it, the noise is almost unbearable and you can’t make out much. And every morning there’s another story, political gaffe or blunder or whatever, but it’s going to be a big Labour win, I think.

 

Mark Collett: Good, good.

 

Well, thank you for that. Tollah, my friend. Good to have you here on the all star panel. What are your overall predictions, my friend? When you’ve given them in, if you say Labour, if you say Tory, what do you think the winning party is going to have in terms of seats?

 

The Ayatollah: Well, thanks for having me, first of all. Yeah. You can’t predict anything other than the Labour win, despite the fact that there isn’t an enormous amount of grassroots enthusiasm for Starmer or for Labour. And that’s not helped by the fact that they’re seen as being complicit in the Gaza genocide, you know, by their sort of, broadly speaking, their kind of zionism and so on.

 

Obviously, it always bears repeating that Keir Starmer. Keir Six Pointed Starmer, as I called him on TASOB four and a half years ago when he replaced Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader, when the jews had Corbyn ousted. He’s married to a jewish woman and they’re raising their daughters in the jewish faith. My main prediction is that the Tories won’t do as badly as people predict, sadly. I think they may well still get over 100 seats.

 

As to how many Labour we get, I don’t know. Reform might take one or two, but they won’t take more, despite the fact that they may actually get a really good number of votes, because I think we’ve got an unprecedented level of disillusionment with the two major parties. I mean, on the lack of popularity of Labour, the one point I would make is, even though it was all predicated on, like, a type of deception, of a sophistication we haven’t seen before in British politics.

 

And it was all predicated on kind of lies and spin, say what you will, about new Labourites, demonic as they were, and their kind of successes remain. People were deceived into genuine enthusiasm for them before the 1997 election, before the kind of Blair and brown era. I don’t think that’s the case that time. But people hate the Tories so much, and with good reason, you know, that they’ll. Yeah, they will get hit hard, but I think they may still get over 100 seats.

 

The Tories. The latest prediction today from Telegraph was that they’d get 53 in a survey, the Telegraph commission, the Tories. But I don’t know how many that would leave Labour with? It’ll be a lot. I think they’ll have a decent majority because I can’t imagine the vote’s going to be split too much other ways because of First Past the Post, basically.

 

Mark Collett: So if you were to give a number of Labour seats, what would you go for? Natty’s gone for 570, so you’ve got to pick a whole new, …

 

The Ayatollah: What’s the total in Parliament? Is it about 630 or something? Right.

 

Mark Collett: Remember, 2 seconds. Remember, only 632 of those seats are on the mainland, so 18 and Northern Ireland seats, which basically you never get Labour.

 

So, you know, even if Tories totally whitewashed it, they’d still probably only get 632. Do, you know what I mean?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, a bit would depend on how the and [word unclear] do, but I would think Labour would be on course to get well over 450, I would think.

 

Mark Collett: Give me an exact number.

 

The Ayatollah: 463.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

And finally, on to the big man himself. Big daddy David, we are blessed to have you here tonight, mate. And I am really looking forward to your take. Specifically, the next question is a question for you. But what are your predictions, my friend?

 

David Clews: I’m predicting victory for the Likud party, the Trilateral Commission, the Fabian Society. It is quite, quite funny. I just took Tallis to the next level. Yeah. I’ve had the opinion from the very start that Sunak is actually deliberately throwing this election.

 

Now, you know what? I quite like my rabbit holes. I like to be, perhaps one might say, slightly more conspiratorial. I think that Sunak is throwing this election on purpose, and the reasons I think he’s doing that is he had no excuses or reason to call it when he did in July. He could have waited till October, November. His behaviour on the campaign trail has been so horrific, it was the same as during Covid. Remember, they always used to say:

 

“Well, it’s just incompetent. There are degrees of incompetence.”

 

So I think he’s deliberately throwing it, and I think they’re doing it because they want to install Starmer, because Starmer’s their golden boy, and Sunak is a puppet. He’s typical of all these sort of basically Indian CEO’s that run companies now. They’re all very, very Zionist. They’re all very pliable. And he’ll go to San Diego. Job done.

 

I mean, yes, it’s an uncomfortable couple of months. Yeah. I mean, seats wise, really, it could be anything. I think the one thing I would say is, I think the SNP might do better than people think. That’s the only one up in Scotland. Like, everyone’s written off the SNP. I am not so sure that Labour will do as well as people think up here, but in terms of seat predictions.

 

So you’ve got 630 at play. I would say that that Tories will get less than 100. I think the Lib Dems will do pretty well. Probably about five. I would say about 540 would be my number.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’ll give my brief predictions. I’ve already predicted a Labour landslide and I’ve said Labour will get between 500 and 550.

 

So I’m going to go square in the middle there at 525. I think the Tories will get less than 100 seats. I think, like David said, the SNP will do slightly better than expected. And I’ve already said, actually, that the Tories could be pushed into third or fourth place actually behind the Lib Dems and the SNP, if things go particularly badly, because you’ve got to remember, not every marginal seat is a marginal seat. That is Tory, Labour. There are many marginal seats which are Tory Lib Dem. Lib Dem seem to be a vote that people would rather jump to rather than Labour in certain sort of leafy Tory areas.

 

For some reason, I think that Farage may well get elected in Clacton. Now. I said he wouldn’t earlier, but he’s become such a legitimate celebrity candidate after being on the:

 

“I’m a celebrity, get me out of here!”

 

He’s just got this power. You rarely get this.

 

I think there’s only two candidates in the whole country you would call celebrity politicians, and that’s Galloway and Farage.

 

But I don’t think Farage will get enough of a block in Parliament to be significant. I’d like to be proven wrong there, but because although I don’t like Reform and what Farage really stands for, the fact they’re talking our talking points, it’d be nice to see them going over the line on an ethno-nationalist ticket, which is what they’re fighting on. Deport all migrants. Which is basically his new campaign slogan. Deport all illegal migrants. Stop the boat is the exact same wording, minus two letters. What is on the election leaflet that we’ve put out for the ethno-nationalist candidates as they deport all illegal immigrants rather than migrants? Stop the boats. He’s basically lifted that off us.

 

So in a way, it’s an endorsement of our points, which is good. So my prediction is 525 for Labour fewer than 100 for the Tories. Lib Dems doing okay, SNP doing better than expected, but Reform really unfortunately slightly underperforming. And I do think Galloway will be unseated in Rochdale as well due to the amount of establishment pressure being put on him. And I hope, I’d like to be proved wrong there, but I think that’ll be the case.

 

Anyway, let’s go on next because this is a real David Clews question. We’ll go around the group. I didn’t have to stop David earlier because he was going into the territory of the next question, which is, what do you think this is all going to lead to? Because we’re going into a time which may make the majorities of Blair and Thatcher look piffling. It’ll certainly likely to make the Johnson majority look small. This is going to be for one party to end up with over 500 seats and the rest to be very fragmented, is new territory, post Second World War in the UK. What do you think that will lead to, Natty? A massive Labour majority. What will that lead to?

 

Natty: Well, it’s hard to predict because I know David said that it’s the Likud party winning.

 

However, a significant proportion of Labour’s base and their core voters are really not on board with Israel. And a lot of, like Corbynite voters who will hold their noses and vote for Labour Party aren’t happy with Starmer’s stance on Israel. So it’s easy to think, well, big majority, pro-zionism and just unwavering support for Israel.

 

Now, you may get that in the backrooms, but it’s not going to be on the surface. And they can’t go shouting about that if they do. I just want to say, I mean, I have given the biggest prediction for the Labour seats here. I haven’t just pulled that number from my backside. I know that there are going to be conservative holdout seats, but you’ve got to remember that there is still a racial component to this and a lot of the kind of pension age people who died in the war, Conservatives are going to find it very, very hard to vote for Rishi Sunak, if nothing else, purely on racial grounds, because it’s like a national shame, national embarrassment, that we have an Indian man at the head of the country, ostensibly the head of a country. I mean, we all know that he’s beholden to other powers.

 

However, don’t underestimate the fact that, as the Twitter and the pundit class would say, these people are racist in the best way possible and will not vote for Rishi Sunak.

 

Mark Collett: That’s a good take. Tollah, what do you think? Where’s this leading? And what will happen with such a sizable Labour majority?

 

The Ayatollah: I think it would be terrible. I think the overwhelming majority of what we hate will rapidly accelerate. There wouldn’t have, you know, had the Tories carried on it like people somehow kind of been kind of psyopped by some, but even by kind of this occupation standards, incredible conditioning and manipulation into just voting the Tories in again, which isn’t going to happen. It would have continued to accelerate because that just seems to be what they’re doing.

 

But there’s going to be even less kind of token resistance to that with Labour. What you’ve got to remember with the Labour Party is they are staffed not entirely, but almost entirely by true believers, like actual cultists. These are cultists of the Zionist occupation regime, make no mistake about it, and a lot of vengeful non-Whites.

 

Now, don’t get me wrong. Obviously it’s comics, as Natty was just talking about. It’s comically true of the Tories of recent years with Sunak, with Braviman, with Patel, with Javid, with Kwarteng. You know, that the name goes on. The list goes on. Sorry, the names go on, whichever you prefer. Yeah, they’re obviously racial foreigners as well.

 

But I think some of them probably are somewhat milquetoast Conservatives rather than absolute grievance mongers like your Diane Abbotts and everything else.

 

Now, as despicable as the Tories are, and we can’t say that enough, I think there are some people within the party, albeit they don’t have much influence at all! They’re somewhat normal. Still, in their sensibilities. They are not total ZOG cultists. I think that’s much less true with Labour. They will feel they’ve got a mandate to do all of this stuff. Yes, it’s antithetical to what, you know, people in the old Red Wall, which is presumably going to be at least partially restored in, like the north of England want. But who gives a damn about what they want? Who’s give damn about what, you know, who’s giving damn about what they want and what people like us want for generations? Nobody.

 

So they’ll feel they’ve got a mandate to just go full throttle with immigration, with anti-White legislation, with just creating an atmosphere of anti-Whiteness. They’re obviously going to be controlled enough by the usual Zionist interest that, yeah, they’ll have to ride out the tension of being hated by part of their Muslim base and whatever else for continuing to support Israel and jewish interests.

 

Now, the other thing with that is that what that may lead to, and this is an obvious prediction to make, is a fracturing in which they lose a lot of their Muslim support and Muslims look to form their own party. That’s probably been sort of down the road for a while and we’re getting closer to it, but I think things will get worse.

 

But, yeah, that may, as awful as that sounds, that may not be a bad thing because the riots been on the war for a while, that things will have to get worse before they get better. But whether they will or not, that’s another matter. Whether they will get better, that is. They’ll definitely get worse.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. This is one for you, David. It’s almost the question written for you, but what’s going to happen with this Labour majority and how bad could it be?

 

David Clews: Yeah, these are all fantastic takes and everyone really gets it. I’ve been listening to a lot of the Academic Agent, he started the zero seats campaign and he’s obviously a very, very sharp guy.

 

I mean, yeah, I’m quite black pilled when it comes to politics in general, but I understand what he’s trying to do and his point is you destroy the Tory Party, which is one part of the university-party, at least one standing, Labour have nowhere to hide. If I was Keir Starmer or if I was in the Labour front bench, I would probably be excuse, shitting myself right now because you’re going to get in, you’re going to have this huge majority. This isn’t 1997, you’ve not got a balanced budget, you’ve not got an economic surplus, you’ve got huge financial problems like nothing compared to what Blair inherited, and you’re going to be the only ones left. Like, there’ll be nowhere to hide and what he is saying will happen.

 

And I think this is very believable and even, dare I say, as much as I hate him, Andrew Neil pointed this out as well. Within six months, like, support for the Labour Party will collapse because you’ve got all those internal conflicts. People will see what’s going on.

 

And that’s where, though I, again, I am slightly more conspiratorial about it all. I think there is a plan for some form of conflict and war and I think that’s what all this is leading towards, whether it’s NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine or. I also think Trump will get in a war with Iran on behalf of Israel. So I think. And that’s where you’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think Farage also has a role to play in. We could maybe expand on that.

 

So initially, I think you’ll have Labour will come in, there’ll be this groundswell of support. But this is not 1997. This is not like I remember when Blair won in 97. People loved Tony Blair. Like, there was I hated him, I hated the guy, but you could see it and, like, things can only get better. What basically this election is, we fucking hate Britannia, mate.

 

Mark Collett: Is what?

 

David Clews: Britannia.

 

Mark Collett: Britannia.

 

David Clews: We hate the Tories. Let’s give them a do. And everyone’s right as well about the racial aspect of it. Starmer, even Labour have been playing the dog whistle. Starmer was. Well, that’s the problem with Rishi Sunak. He just doesn’t get Britain. Now we know fine well what that means. He’s saying:

 

“Well, he’s not one of you.”

 

And the public get that as well, and that will be the nail in the coffin for the Tories.

 

And at the end of the day, whether people like Starmer or not, he is an English man. He was born in, I mean, he’s a Cockney. I mean, well, he’s not really a full Cockney, but it’s in the southeast of England. He’s genuinely one of the people. And people don’t view things the way we do. So for your average normie, they’ll look at it, they’ll say:

 

“Well, yeah, he served the government, he’s a Sir, we’ll vote for him.”

 

The Ayatollah: His father was a tool maker, apparently. Yeah, he definitely did. Yeah. Funny, funny, funny.

 

Natty: As to cycling back to the question, it’s very easy to say things are going to get worse before they’re going to get better.

 

But when it actually comes down to the wire and you’re staring down that choice of a huge Labour majority, it is intimidating, because you’re right, it is going to get worse. You think it’s draconian now, things are going to be bad, and we’re looking at different aspects and different things going on and saying, it’s bad now, it’s bad now, it has to get worse before it can get better.

 

But for things to actually get worse and to actually make that choice and put a Mark on a piece of paper, that’s a difficult thing for nationalists to do because it’s so much easier just to cling on to hope and say our Reform, they could change it around, this is good times and maybe the right people in a Conservative Party could change things around.

 

But it’s a tough choice. Every man in his own head is probably thinking, you know, Labour are gonna really really hurt us as the native population and there’s no question about it.

 

Mark Collett: Well I’m gonna have a couple of predictions that you can all comment on.

 

Firstly, I think there is a meaning to all this. I’ve noticed that Labour are campaigning with the Union Jack a lot.

 

There’s been prevalent discussion of conscription, return to national service, the importance of the military being a strong nation. Sunak said he doesn’t want to be a wartime leader. Andrew Bridgen said the country’s already at war. I believe Suella Barverman said that we are effectively at war as well. I think they’re cleaning out a tattered worthless government that wouldn’t have the moral backing to take us into an actual hot war, to bring in a party that would have such a backing on paper that it would look like they had the legitimacy to take us into a war and a clean record because all those old Labour MP’s that were part of the Blair Brown times, most of them have gone now.

 

This is a fresh start. I think they’re looking to take us into something very very dangerous and I think part of that will be bundled with if we’re going down this route, if we’re going to war, if we’re going to be fighting, we need a massive clamp down on any form of dissident discussion and that will be dissidents on both the Right, mainly the Right, but also on the left as well because they will want to say:

 

“Look, we need a unified nation because now.”

 

And look this is shades of World War Two because World War Two was:

 

“But we’re fighting for democracy, we’re fighting for freedom, we’re fighting for British values.”

 

All this crap. When really they were fighting to keep a certain group of bankers in control of the Western world, that’s what it was for, and to prop up communism. And the communists were the brothers of the bankers who were controlling the Western world. That’s what happened. It’s just a fact.

 

And I find that a lot of the same rhetoric used then is being used now:

 

“We’re fighting for democracy. There’s a shadow over the world, an Axis of evil!”

 

What were the, what was the German and Italian forces called? The Axis forces. It’s almost like when you’re reading a poem and everything rhymes you can see the lines that match up with the ones that have been previously spoken. And this is all happening.

 

And just as they did with Mosley, just as they did with other dissident groups in the UK, I can see them really clamping down on indigenous groups specifically because they’re going to need White men. A war in this country, or a war involving Britain does not get fought without White men marching off happily to die. And they don’t want White men listening to this panel of people tonight or listening to UNN or tuning into one of Tollah’s shows. They don’t want that! They want White men thinking Labour is the party of the Union Jack, the party of patriotism, so they’ll fight.

 

Natty, I don’t know if you want to comment on that. And we’ll go around the group before we move on to Farage.

 

Natty: Let someone else go first, I think, on this one.

 

Mark Collett: Go on, David. You go first, mate.

 

The Ayatollah: This is your one.

 

Mark Collett: We’ll do it in reverse this time. We’ll go David Tollah, Natty this time.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, he’s exactly correct. The language being utilised. Grant Sharp’s an Axis of Tyranny. Except I struggle to comprehend, though, how the ruling elites are the powers that think people are going to fight these wars for them. Because where is that support going to come from? And who is going to go to the recruitment offices? Because we have this aged population. Young guys have never been in the cadets, the scouts, they don’t know how to fire or strip a gun. I mean, you watch the footage of cadets marching. They can barely march, certainly not in step.

 

So it is a weirdness about it, which, again, makes you feel you’re at this kind of end of Empire stage.

 

But yeah, that’s where, and I know we’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think the likes of Farage comes in, Tommy Robinson comes in, Geert Wilders, there’s Marine Le Pen. And that is why you see the Zionist power structure, you know, pivoting away now towards what you would call Right-wing politics. And there is this clear alliance that now exists.

 

And a lot of people are mistakenly thinking, well, we work with these people and we get to deport people. We get to do all that.

 

Actually, no, you’re still on the strings. You’re not going to achieve anything.

 

And I think that’s probably one of the more interesting dynamics that’s coming out of this, because you look at some of the Reform stuff, you look at what, and all that seems okay, but then you just realise, well, it’s not being done for our interests. It’s being done for that group’s interest. And I was putting this up today. You’ve got Blackrock supports Starmer coming in. You’ve got Blackstone now buying up rental properties.

 

So the international banking cartel is still, business is still booming in the UK for them.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, just follow up on that. I mean, well, particularly on what you were saying, Mark.

 

I mean, that’s interesting because if they’re going to do what you described, then it has to be, it needs to be, as you’ve said, they need White men if they’re going to actually participate in like a kind of a NATO versus Russia and its allies war or Iran or whatever. They need a lot more White men than they’re getting. And we’re talking kind of long time scales because you’ve got to recruit them, get them in and all of that kind of thing.

 

And it would necessitate, if they’re going to do that and then kind of basically clamp down harder on non-compliant Whites. They need to draw a sharp distinction between the two. And it needs to be a lot of carrot and a much more conciliatory tone. Contrary to what I was saying, I would expect the Labour government to be like before. They will need to box a bit more clever with that and just throw the White working class a bit of toffee and just soften their rhetoric a bit and make it, you know, sort of butter them up. You know, make it, make a few token concessions.

 

And then, yeah, people like us, they will kind of quarantine as much as they can and really clamp down and it will be a kind of a, well, which way do you want to go? Do you want to be patriotic or do you want to be one of those people in jail? And it’s quite possible they’ll go that way with it, I suppose. Yeah. Because as you say, when you look at it in its geopolitical contexts, the sort of the drums of war seem to have been being struck for a good while now.

 

But I mean, just picking up on what David said, I think it was you, David and other people shared it around. I think it was you that shared the video of the, like, it was kind of combined services marching. And I used the word loosely through London a couple of, like a month or two back and they’re all just like fat, uncoordinated idiots. Like, with the greatest respect, I’d be more scared of sees.

 

Mark Collett: It was like the old police.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, no, I’d be more. I’d be more scared of the Bass street kids teaming up with Harvey Price, you know, so, I mean crikey. Yeah, it’s extraordinary! I mean the slight black pill on that is they’ll get enough, like high IQ, autistic people to kind of do the high tech stuff, which is a big part of our war is fought now with your drones and your unmanned vehicles and all sorts of other things and cyber warfare and all the rest of it. And you ain’t going to be mega-bright to go and be cannon fodder, but you’ve got to be at least competent and have a bit of bottle. Are they going to get people that are like that? Well, if they do, yeah, they want to get more working class White people.

 

So, yeah, they might have to sort of be a bit of current. Stick with the White population. And that’s always our lament.

 

I mean, I said this after Chris Kearney, better known as Charlie Big Potatoes, got his sentence this time last year. The great frustration under this regime is, and it’s like the old point that I heard Warren Balogh make this point once about communist Hungary after 1955, I think it was. They kind of realised you can’t, it doesn’t really pay in the long run to be absolutely brutal with everyone because you make an enemy of everyone together and everybody knows what’s going on. The more people, you limit that to the real harsh treatment.

 

On the one hand, it’s not that it’s more effective, but you aren’t creating so much ill will among the other people that are allowed to just sort of stay fat and comfortable. Not that too many people were kind of fat under communism, although apparently they were in Russia. The Russians were fatter in the seventies than in the eighties. Sorry, than Americans in the seventies, apparently. That’s courtesy of Eric Striker. I’ve been forever checked that off your bingo card.

 

But, yeah, that’s me done for the moment.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s right. At the moment, the client groups of the British government and European ZOG, whatever you want to call it, are immigrants, third world immigrants, Africans, Middle Easterners, whatever. But a war, all out war with NATO’s enemies, it’s entirely possible and reasonable to predict.

 

But actually the White young men of this country are treated as a client group and are riled up in the way we see Tommy Robinson riling up against Muslims. And he obviously gets paid for that, paid handsomely, to ignore people pointing out the obvious truth to him, that it’s actually people not exactly like us, but our peers, young guys, young White guys, native people of this country, who are treated as the client groups of the British state in order to get them back in tanks, to get them back in trenches, to teach them how to fight and to try and instil some sort of patriotic values in them.

 

Whether that’s possible, I don’t know. Have they done enough damage? It’s hard to see from where we are, because all of us here, I hate our government because they’re absolute scum and they’re absolute traitors! But for a bricklayer, or a tradie, or a guy who’s not that plugged in, it’s hard to say.

 

I mean, this may become illegal at some point, but I wouldn’t fight for this government. I think you’d have to put me in jail first. And maybe that’s a choice all of us are going to have to make down the line at some point. Hopefully not.

 

But it’s entirely possible that they can actually achieve that with the right people. And we’re skirting around for arch.

 

But I think that’s where the conversation is going to go.

 

David Clews: Again, just to come in quickly on that from a more chess perspective, what they would require to do that is some form of, I would call, serious false flag provocation. You would need 9/11 style events because you look at America after 9/11, George Bush’s approval rating went up to like, what, 94, 95% or something like that.

 

Now, if you’re to witness, I know, dare I say, someone running around a shopping centre shooting people and their Hezbollah ID card drops out like they did with Mohammed Atta’s passport falling out of the sky. Don’t underestimate the power a serious false flag attack or some form of real visual thing would have on the general population. When I come across people in the counter jihad movement the hatred that is there for Muslims, for Islam, for the Islamification which is real, you know, that many places have been changed. If you were to see Lee Rigby style situations, Manchester bombing situations, I think people would mobilise.

 

You saw the football lads alliance, the amount of people that got out for that. So I certainly wouldn’t put it past the government that there would be these huge false flag attempt things, there would be Muslims that do it linked to Iran, you know, that funded this was funded by Tehran, this, the mullah. Even though Shia Muslims have never engaged in international terrorism or done all that, it’s always been sponsored by Mossad, the CIA. I think you would find that would really, and as you say, they know people are race based and they want to plug into that.

 

So that’s what I think is how they would really mobilise public support.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I want to pivot away from that slightly before we go on to Farage, just for a quick point, because there’s been a lot of this in the press over the last couple of days.

 

Now, one of the things that Labour is intent on doing as well seems to be attacking middle England. And I was prompted to mention this because David said something very interesting about Blackrock, Blackstone. These are the huge investor groups, but they really do seem to be intent on already preparing a charter that will primarily hit your sort of just above average tax paying people who’ve got a little bit of something for themselves.

 

So one of their insane schemes is to put VAT on private school fees or why would you do that? If somebody’s paying to send their own child to school, they’re doing the nation a service.

 

Number one, they’re easing the burden on state schools, which are already too full.

 

Number two, they are paying for a better standard of education for their child.

 

And the more educated people you have in your nation, that’s a good thing. Why would you then increase that family’s burden by 20%, potentially forcing their children out of a better schooling, dumping them into an already over stretched, oversaturated state school system, unless you just hated people having anything nice. And it’s the same with inheritance tax. They’re already talking about increasing inheritance tax, they’re talking about swooping on family savings accounts.

 

This, to me looks like a blatant attempt by what can only be described as people who have serious aspirations to produce some kind of communist terror, redistribution of wealth, etcetera, to actually take what little there is left from people who have lived a frugal life and got a bit of a nest egg.

 

I mean, that to me is in many ways as terrifying in terms of its intent as taking us to war. Because really what you’re saying, and if you put those things in the same basket, let’s not totally separate them, let’s put them in the same basket. Now you’re reducing everyone to the level of being an utter peasant under these political rulers, these financiers etcetera. And then you’re saying to the peasantry:

 

“Now you’ve got nothing. We’re marching you off to war to die.”

 

What’s your thoughts on that, guys? Who wants to go first on that one?

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a level of discomfort that states who oppress and are, in our case, in the process of slowly ethnically cleansing. There’s a level of discomfort where people don’t rebel. And it’s typically in revolutions, it’s been the middle class who have been activated against the elites. This is true in Russia. And they’ve always had elite support, normally from the elites who aren’t in power, who support a middle class uprising.

 

Now, again, I mean, maybe I’m in the Right company here for conspiratorial talk, but reducing the middle class and taking enough away from them so that they become dispossessed and hard up and struggling to make ends meet, but not to the point where they’re ready to grab a pitchfork and a Molotov cocktail is exactly the kind of evil shenanigans that a government like ours would pull.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I think a lot of people heading towards that point because of cost of living increases as well. I would just say quickly, and because of the lack of viability for a lot of people, of even renting sometimes, let alone owning a home, forming a family and all the rest of it.

 

But, I mean, if they’re orchestrating that to the degree we think they might be, it’s whether they end up striking the right balance, because, as you kind of allude to, Natty, it’s a delicate balance.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

David Clews: Look at what they did to try and curb inflation. They stuck interest rates up to, what, five and a half percent?

 

Now, all they’ve actually done is created a boom for the boomer generation. I actually go quite hard on boomers, no offence to based boomers watching, but what they did by doing that was people under the age of 60 who had mortgages, you’re shafted. You’re an extra 5% a year interest, you know, 5% on 100 grand, five grand, 200 grand, that’s ten grand.

 

Whereas if you’re sitting there with a decent enough nest egg.

 

So what they’ve done is they’ve done that and they’ve screwed this generation.

 

And as you say, Mark, about the private schooling as well, is for a lot of people, the choice is a local comprehensive school in a diverse area, or you pay a bit extra.

 

And the thing is, that’s actually a very regressive policy on private schools, because when you do that, it subsidizes a place for someone else, actually benefits the state system.

 

And again, it is what you find with the people like Starmer and the people behind him is it really is race to the bottom stuff. It will be about equality and diversity.

 

Whereas at least, dare I say, Blairism. Blairism at least got the more aspirational aspect of this country that he got Thatcherism, whereas with Starmer, his career, he’s been director of public prosecutions. Very banal. And they don’t want anybody to be in. Like they probably another thing they’ll do, and I know a lot of people watching this will do, is they’ll probably ban home-schooling, because if they hate you sending your kids to a private school, though, they would hate you even more that you’re educating your own kids.

 

I mean, that, I think should be another cause for concern. They would say:

 

“These kids might be getting taught far-Right propaganda at home, and they’re not getting the same.”

 

So they’ll start with private schools, then it’ll be home-schooling, and then it’ll be faith schools as well, until it’s just bog standard comprehensives preaching the gospel according to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: So does anyone else want to comment on any of that before we move on to the man, the myth, the legend, Nigel Farage? Because that’s where this is going.

 

Now, Farage has come out of nowhere, and from a guy who at the beginning of this election, wrote an open letter to the public saying he wouldn’t be standing, he now seems to have been reactivated to the point where either he was playing an amazing game or the state needed him to do this. It’s one or the other.

 

Now, on one hand, you could say the state needed him because they want to smash the Tories and grant Labour this year, huge majority, to take us to war.

 

But on the other hand, he has played a very good game. And look, I’m not his biggest fan, but you’ve got to grant credit to a Smooth Operator when it’s due. And apparently, allegedly. Supposedly, when he left the Brexit Party, it has been said to me by several people that he took in the region of 18 and a half million pounds because it was his company, he took it with him. He said that was his money, it was his severance, etcetera. No one stopped him doing this. And I don’t believe there’s any litigation against him. I don’t believe he’s technically done anything illegal.

 

If it is true that he did this, and then he used that money, apparently, allegedly, supposedly, to buy his way into things like GB News. He’s effectively now, whilst retaining full control over the Brexit Party because he is the sole director of it and it is a company.

 

And then he uses GB News to pump out, 24 hours a day, Nigel Farage, publicity broadcasts and boom! What have you got? It’s almost like I’ve got the name of the damn film now.

 

David Clews: Orson Welles in Citizen Kane.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, almost like Citizen Game, where he buys up the media to get himself elected. This guy has used his money, he’s used his power, he’s got the Daily Express on his side, he’s got GB News running constant reels. The BBC and other groups are having to wheel him out, because if they don’t, no one’s going to watch the debates. I mean, no one cares about Angela Reyna, some low IQ chav debating with Penny Mordant to some relatively yummy mummy, middle class housewife.

 

I mean, that’s just mild titillation as best. They want Farage on there, ripping them a new one so they can’t ignore him.

 

And what’s more, they’ve made him what he is, a little bit like they made Trump by putting him on. I’m a celebrity by building him up when he wasn’t doing the politics. It let him come back even bigger, tougher, more relatable, more lovable than he was before. I believe the milkshake thing was a setup to get him sympathy and get him talked about. There’s pictures of him and that girl hugging each other when she’s., … You know, on that day, she looked like a scruffy little chap that no one would have got on with. The night when she’s hugging him. The night when she’s hugging him. And she met him before in a beautiful dress, hair done, nice, makeup all done properly. She looks like the kind of girl he might have on his arm the casino or something.

 

And to me, it looks like a mixture of him playing his cards very well, a little bit of maybe contrivance and the system having to build somebody up to make the election interesting.

 

But I think Farage is pulling it out the bag.

 

But I’m not sure whether he will get the electoral gains that you would think he would deserve for the amount of publicity he’s getting.

 

What are your thoughts on Farage and on his prospects? Natty?

 

Natty: Well, I think this is a lesson and unfortunately, the Americans have not learnt this, and you’ve put a lot of detail in there, and it’s very well done, and you’re absolutely correct on all of it. But you take a slightly more bird’s eye view on this is a lesson, unfortunately, the Americans haven’t learnt yet, despite Trump betraying them. I think we in Europe are still going to have to learn this, which is why our fortunes are not going to change in the next 5, 10, 15 years, possibly that far out. But he goes to America, meets up with Trump, comes back, and all of a sudden, the playbook is almost exactly the same as Trump in 2016. He’s probably got the same type of money behind him, and we would be looking at the same sort of betrayal if Farage did get in.

 

Now, he’s obviously not going to become the prime minister, not in this election cycle, in the next election cycle, if Labour are really going to be as unpopular as we think they are. Possibly. But at that point, we have to then learn exactly what the Americans failed to learn with Trump and what the French are going to have to learn with Marine Le Pen and the Germans, possibly with AfD, and that Reform isn’t good enough and Reform isn’t going to save us. I don’t know what is yet.

 

But it’s trying to keep a decrepit and rusty train on the tracks using dog whistles and red meat, tastier red meat, than you’re going to get with the Tories, for sure. But unfortunately, for all the excitement and to read Nigel Farage’s manifesto, I know it’s not called that, it’s called a “Contract”. And it’s very easy to write something like that when you’re not staring down in the face of power. But to read that even someone like me, who can’t stand Farage, and I know the history of Farage, even me reading that is like, this is amazing!

 

But like I said, it would have to be a lesson that we would have to learn, and it’s going to be a hard lesson.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah, your thoughts?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, well, I mean, you mentioned there about Farage probably playing a smart game and being controlled intelligently as well, and some combination of, too. But he’s probably not. There’s still not a great likelihood that Reform are going to get enough seats in Parliament to exert much influence. And I mean, look, even if they did, again, they would be controlled to a greater degree than they are now and to as great a degree as the powers that be need, really, and First Past the Post is the perennial obstacle to that, to any insurgent candidate or party really exerting much influence over even the discourse in this country, because discourse and kind of the Overton Window is the only thing that ever really seems to get influenced, influenced.

 

But then again, and acknowledging that even with that, Farage is possibly somewhat controlled. I mean, to the degree that you can probably have some idiot true believer who’s the head of whatever. I mean, he was banking with Coots, wasn’t he, when he got debunked? But coots are owned by one of the big sort of they were owned by Nat west or something, and it was some senior executive there. He’s probably some idiot true believer who’s not in on the whole thing, has signed off on him, having his bank account taken off him, and then it’s come back to like, well, no, no, no, you don’t do that to him. You do that to these far-Right people, you do that to White nationalists, you do that to people from Patriotic Alternative and so on and so forth.

 

But, yeah, I mean, Farage somewhat controlled and somewhat of an asset that we would appear to be. I mean, bearing in mind, whether consciously or not, because, I mean, he’s obviously sort of proud to proclaim how UK sort of were a massive spoke in the wheels of the British National Party 15 to 20 years ago.

 

However, what people miss is the fact that they were then promoted for that purpose. They were promoted by the establishment. That’s why the idiots, the mushrooms, or the vegetables, as I like to call them, the rank and file regime loyalist liberals would be in paroxysms of rage about Farage. Why is Farage on Question Time again? Farage is on there so that they can boast for more support for UKIP, so that that gets in the way of the British National Party, gets in the way of the thing that you’ve really being conditioned to be afraid of the genuine article. Farage is a bit of a scarecrow.

 

But, I mean, even then, unless you believe that the powers that be wanted Brexit, and in the end, even if they didn’t think it eight, nine years ago, they’ve probably been given this and we’ve seen enough evidence to show that they could have been more or less indifferent about it, because it’s got us none of what we would have wanted. UKIP under Farage, despite only winning one seat in the First Past the Post system did a lot to force the referendum which led to Brexit.

 

But again, when that kind of thing happens, like you know, if, say, Le Pen gets elected in France, they can control them enough that nothing ever really happens. Same with Trump in America. Nothing, you know, nothing that the native White population ever really want that really matters is ever allowed to happen. And barring any kind of political rupture, I think we are stuck with that.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

I mean, the way I kind of describe it is what we’re really viewing is a pantomime or some theatre, and it tends to be the people that direct the films in Hollywood direct this pantomime as well.

 

So when you’re, if you look at it that way, there will be some characters that you really identify with. There will be characters that get really angry and walk off stage every so often, but they’re still part of the same play, they’re still part of the same nexus and power structure. So it’s always important to recognise that.

 

And I think there is a level of pragmatism you do need to have and say:

 

“Well, look, this is the system that we’re in. You have to work within the confines of it.”

 

But I am much more negative about Farage because I think he is there for a very specific reason.

 

And I think that October 7 was such a pivotal moment in history. And Farage has been brought in to co-opt the genuine anger, the Right-wing support for potentially upcoming conflicts with Iran or whoever. And Farage, if you look at old Farage, Farage knows the score. He knows who pulls the strings. He talked regularly about Soros. He would talk about, he was much more sympathetic to Putin, doesn’t do any of that now. You know, he is very focused.

 

And I had our guest on Kathryn Blakelock the other night, who’s certainly taken an interesting turn recently. And she was like:

 

“Well I’m not really into geopolitics. I’m more worried about the potholes and Greater Yarmouth.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Well like, geopolitics is really everything here and the power structure and so many people are still stuck five years ago. They’ve not moved on.”

 

And it’s the same with Trump. Like, the big thing for me about Trump was this hundred million donation that Trump’s got from (((Miriam Adelson))). You don’t get given 100 million by Miriam Adelson, who is the richest woman in Israel, owns the casinos, if you’re just going to be a nice guy and put the interests of White Americans first, that’s the money.

 

And then all of Wall Street is now behind Donald Trump as well, Bill Ackman, Steven Schwartzman at Blackstone, even Larry Fink, even the ADL have given the nod. So I see this as all the pieces being put into place.

 

And I think Farage is a key part of that because he will represent the sort of contain the Right-wing anger that there may be. He will be a Churchill figure, if you’re using the analogy. Again, he will act as that “I’m patriotic, I love this country”, etcetera. He’ll play that role, and he’ll play it very well, and people will subscribe to it. Again, we can look at it on a short term vote Reform to give the Tories a kick. Fine.

 

But I think with Farage in Parliament, I think he’ll have a very, very specific role to play. He is, again, he wants to be part of the establishment. Like, I watched all the royal coverage. Farage was there at the Coronation, all the wonderful patriotism. King Charles, like, he is only gonna take things so far. He will do what needs to be done, whether it’s because he’s blackmailed, compromised financial, or maybe he just, he just wants the title.

 

And again, the other thing that I think we sometimes forget is a lot of these people have blackmail on them. Like, you know, we don’t work or live in these circles. You know, a lot of these people have done a lot of things in the past. They’ve been a lot of places. It’s such a murky, murky, murky world, and we only see a very, very shallow part of it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll say one thing, and this is partially about what my video’s about on Friday, so I don’t want to go into it. I’m going to lay out in my video all the reasons, all the sort of evidence I’ve got, Farage not being us, but he is talking our talking points. You know, when we put together these campaigns about stop the boats, deport all illegal immigrants, I didn’t think Farage would take that point on verbatim.

 

Yet he has.

 

And I’ve got to say this for me personally, I believe the more radical Right has had a profound effect on this election, because our constant badgering of people, our constant banner drops, leafleting, pressure that we’ve put on, seems to have driven people like Farage into new territory. We’ve pulled the Overton Window in our direction, and I’ll actually present evidence of this in my video on Friday.

 

But if you look at what Farage is standing on, it’s actually a more radical platform than what the BNP stood on in 2009 at the European election. I did the videos. I did the leaflets back then and the leaflets back then were not heavy on the anti-immigration. They were putting British people first, British jobs for British workers. They did say “no to immigration” boldly on there, but they didn’t say anything about deporting illegals or rounding anyone up. Farage is unironically being forced to fight this election on a more ethno-nationalist re-migration platform than we ever did.

 

David Clews: But again, they can do that.

 

The Ayatollah: No. And they’re never going to get voted in.

 

David Clews: Sorry, but do you not think that they’re doing that on purpose to try and, like, destroy, like someone like yourself? The people here, our viewers, who are genuine nationalists, of course they’re doing it because of that.

 

Mark Collett: But the fact they’ve been forced to do that.

 

David Clews: Yeah, it’s true. It’s a black pill and a white pill at the same time. You know, I’m not saying.

 

Mark Collett: I’m not saying it’s going to get us to power, but for them to start using nakedly ethno-national, like, deportations, remigration, all of that, once you start talking about net numbers, Net Zero-500,000 these are the discussions taking place. But these aren’t the discussions of civn ats in 2016. They’re the discussions of ethno-nationalists that we have been absolutely staunch on.

 

And I just wanted to ask you all whether. Is that a little bit of a silver lining to the cloud of what is clearly, you know, controlled opposition?

 

Natty: Absolutely!

 

But with the caveat that you just do not rest on your laurels. You just have to be uncompromising on this idea that we are being ethnically cleansed.

 

However, whatever definition you want to use, it is happening. It’s happened to the Cockneys, it’s happened to the Brummies, it’s happened to the people of Leeds and Leicester. That is happening! Be uncompromising on that and be uncompromising on calling out jewish supremacy. And the power of the tiny ethnic group seems to hold just all of our governments under total power, basically.

 

So just don’t bend on these and look what happens. You do force, you do change opinions, you do force people to come around. You’re right. 2016 was a different time. It was meme worthy and Brexit and all the rest of it. But there have been certain people who have just held the line on these ideas.

 

And in a way you’re right, it has worked and it is depressing to see like David said, it’s a double edged sword. You see these talking points taken up by people who were just doing it for the grift and are just doing it to contain, but nevertheless, they had to pick them up anyway and had to pick them up and use them to gain popular support.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah. I mean, while sort of politically aware White nationalists, and I say politically aware White nationalists, I’m talking about us because we’re aware of the fact that on certain things, large swathes of the population agree with us, but they’re kind of still what we would call “normies”.

 

And I’ve always been fond of the line that a normie is someone who can say have some sound instincts, but say:

 

“Well, we’re all one race, the human race. But Enoch Powell was right!”

 

In the same sentence because that’s what sort of normal people are like. They’re kind of suggestible to the last compelling, the last thing they heard that sounded compelling and authoritative. But while we’re sort of smaller in number than we would like to be the case, small groups of people who kind of understand what’s going on and make a lot of noise have an outsized impact.

 

And I think you can see the legacy of things they obviously didn’t want to happen and didn’t want to have to contain in ways they did more in terms of rhetoric than anything, rather than anything that happened electorally. But you have got stuff like Brexit and that adjacent to it in sort of the middle of the last decade, we’re going back nearly ten years now. It’s 2015, 2016. And you could actually see this. It probably illustrated all the better not by all of the reaction, but by part of the reaction. Certainly the reaction on the American sort of kosher right to October 7. The Left is another matter that’s basically entirely of the jews own creation through the anti-White agenda and the kind of the victim of hierarchy and all the rest of it.

 

The way the Left reacted is entirely, you know, something they created blown up in their face, which is something to sort of villainise and demonise and attack White people, however, in the way that they just can’t contain the Right, in the way they used to. In the kind of reactions you see to particularly US military recruitment videos. Yeah, I don’t want to die for Israel. You know, they put a load of White men and adverts for the army and the Rangers and whatever else, the Marines. And the comments are just all basically people like us, people probably not as radical as us, but people that are aware of the idea that, yeah, you know, sold that for a game of soldiers, if you give the expression, I’m not dying for Israel. Yeah, it’s had an impact. It’s definitely had an impact that they wouldn’t want to have to contain.

 

I mean, I always say this like, the thing is, the problem is with each round of gatekeeping, they have to kind of hold the gate slightly more ajar. And you’re always going to get the large majority of the people the wrong side of the gate are not going to get through. But the people with the most initiative, some of them will make it through because they’ve to have a sort of a perception, like perceived legitimacy. They’ve got to hold the gate ajar a little bit. And that basically, in practical terms, just means, like, rhetorical concessions. And, yeah, to a degree, they do sanitize some of our talking points.

 

But if they wanted to be using them, they’d have been using them all along, and they haven’t been. I mean, Tommy Robinson was on record saying this last week, wasn’t he? No chance! Posted it on Twitter on X. You know, saying, like, Tommy Robinson was basically saying:

 

“The reason I talk about the White replacement agenda is because the only people that do it otherwise are all, they’re anti-semitic!”

 

Yeah. Because, of course, the great priority for any White political activist is to prevent, you know, criticism of and dissatisfaction with a foreign group of people who basically hold a grossly disproportionate amount of power and ultimately have the final say on pretty much everything naturally.

 

Mark Collett: But, yeah, so what Tollah is saying in the politest and kindest way is that’s the, that’s the polite and kind way to kick me in the bollocks and say, Mark, you spent your whole life crusading for something that you were absolutely right about, but these shills are going to Nick it off you at the last minute, run with it and get all the credit. So there you have it.

 

But that’s what happens when you have a system with contingency. That’s a system with contingency. They have a contingency for everything, and their contingencies control opposition.

 

But one last thing I’ll say about fo this is just my personal take. I do love seeing a different candidate coming out in the news every day for saying something nice about Hitler or the Third Reich. It’s like, you know what?

 

David Clews: Is interesting about that because for when Tice was in charge. They were so cucked to everyone, they basically, they buckled.

 

Whereas when Farage came in, they’ve actually been. It was when the guy said that we shouldn’t have got involved in the Second World War. Reform actually initially put out a press release saying:

 

“Well, that was actually a widely held opinion by many people in the 1930s.”

 

And all of this stuff is very helpful in the Overton Window.

 

And again, it’s like Farage was talking with more on Susanna Reed and Ed Balls, and he was talking about. He said:

 

“Look, he disagrees, etcetera, you know, we did the right thing.”

 

But then Farage did actually say at the end, he says:

 

“But I mean, all that guy was doing was expressing an opinion.”

 

And that’s the thing again, about Farage is like, I think deep down, like, Farage wouldn’t put us in jail for talking about the things that we talk about. Nigel Farage wouldn’t jail you for putting up “It’s okay to be White” stickers, right?

 

We will obviously be very critical of Nigel Farage, but he’s not like Keir Starmer, he’s not like Hope Not Hate, he’s not like the psychopaths that will be around the Tory Party or even the Labour Party. So it’s.

 

I think a lot of people will just have that pragmatic approach to. And say:

 

“Well, look, he’s, he is where he is.”

 

And again, you saw the audience the other night, had Clark.

 

I mean, we’re all probably, what, late thirties, early forties is the only people that really vote on mass are the 60 plus generation. That’s who votes. Like, by and large, the people don’t vote as much under the age of 60, so they have to pander to that boomer generation, they have to do everything. And really, Farage, Farage, I mean, he’s so kind, like, he goes to a pub, like, everyone laughs, you know, he’s infectious and you just, you can’t take that away from him. He is clearly the number one political performer as is Donald Trump. As I say, unfortunately, they’re acting and being paid for by the wrong people.

 

Mark Collett: We’ve got two more questions for you, then we’ll do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet, or if you like the stream and think we deserve a donation, please consider doing so. but two very quick questions.

 

The first is about George Galloway. David Clews, best mate. I actually like George and I actually think, look, I got a lot of flack a while back. I’m not going to make this into a monologue, but I got a lot of flack a while back for saying it was a good thing that he got elected.

 

A lot of people in my comments calling me a cuck, I said both the Tory Party and the Labour Party need destroying with new alternatives on both the Right and the Left, which were both of which were willing to talk about different issues. I thought Galloway fulfilled that point, but I don’t think he’s going to get re-elected in Rochdale. I think the entire establishment’s coming down on him.

 

If you’ve seen the stuff on my page today, he’s talking about suing Hope Not Hate. He’s saying that they’ve literally pulled everything out of the bag to destroy his party in Rochdale. That the increased turnout and the fact he’d be up against the Labour candidate this time when he wasn’t last time. I think, sadly, he’s going to lose his seat and I think that’s going to be a bad thing because I was disappointed with his party’s performance. Farage came out there stood 609 of the 632 mainland seats, but Galloway only stood 125. That’s still a good look, still a good effort. It’s still a lot more than any ethno-nationalist group did. But he was initially saying he was going to stand over 500. And look, I’m not putting him down because I wanted him to stand more. I was just disappointed. There isn’t that alternative for Labour voters that there is for the Tory voters. I don’t know what your thoughts are on Galloway, but I do wish him all the best. But unfortunately, I don’t think he’s got he hasn’t come out with the numbers.

 

Natty: The Labour alternative seems to be the Green party, which is just dead on arrival.

 

I mean, it’s really sandalwares and juice drinkers voting for the Green party. You know, I can’t vote for Keir Starmer type of people. No, Galloway is good. I mean, you got to look at Galloway as an instrument of destruction as opposed to anything else. And the only, this is a this is a very basic test. But who receiving the hardest when Galloway won? Zionists. And if Zionists deceiving. You know, it can’t always be a bad thing! You know, the enemy of my enemy, and all the rest of it.

 

So, yeah, I’m pro-Galloway. It will be a shame if he loses just having him out in front out in the public view. It is in the same way as Farage dropping ethno-nationalist talking points.

 

And if you remember, Galloway was nodding to racial politics in his election.

 

So that’s a good sign. That’s a good sign. >As far as I’m concerned.

 

David Clews: George Galloway is, as a performer, but I mean, he is a bit older now. I actually think he might be nearly. Let me actually just look up exactly what, what?

 

Mark Collett: He is in his seventies, mate.

 

David Clews: Yeah. You know what, he might even be nearly 80, I think.

 

Let me just actually double check that.

 

The Ayatollah: He’s only 69. You know?

 

David Clews: He’s only 69? I thought he was older.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

David Clews: Do, you know, why? The reason he wears the hat most of the time. Do the reason behind that? He actually got a really bad kick in from a jewish guy in London. He got beaten up really, really badly and he’s got like a big bruise on his head.

 

So, yeah, he got a real kick in. I think Natty’s point was accurate. Who was seething the most about Galloway? And that’s when member Sunak came out and gave the speech and the former Nick Griffin backed him. And this guy’s so dangerous! I think, on geopolitics, George Galloway has been really correct over the last 30 years on his geopolitics. He was right about the Iraq war, he was right about Afghanistan, he was right about Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria. He has been outstanding on geopolitics. But George Galloway is also a kind of creation of the post 1945 mythos. And he does view the world through a Marxist prism of politics. I’ve interviewed a few of the people from the Workers Party and they’re all really nice people.

 

And again, when it comes to the war issue, I get on really well with them and we’re all anti-war, but they still, like, they have this weird take on why people do things. And obviously, I think it’s wrong, but it will be a shame to see Galloway not doing well. But I think he was caught off guard. And the reality is most sort of Left-wingers out there who are busy enough to get involved will be kind of, hate to say the word, but “woke”, you know, Galloway stuff would cut through to the public.

 

But it’s a tough one. And for him.

 

And at the same time, you know, he does, a lot of people on the Right find it hard to support Galloway because he does play the Muslim vote. You see pictures of him down the mosque and he’s surrounded by hundreds of people from Pakistan. The optic is a tough, it’s a tough one for Galloway to do because a lot of people, the other point.

 

Natty: Is that the old Red Wall, the Corbinistas, you could, you could appeal to them that immigration is bad because they’re basically scab Labour, destroying the hard working gains of the Labour movement of the last 150 years. Unfortunately, George Galloway is not strong on that.

 

So there’s a whole tranche of people out there who could be stolen from Labour in exactly that way.

 

David Clews: I always say that mass migration is a “tool of the cat”, to use Marxist parlance. It is a tool of the capitalist classes. You’re correct. You’re scabbing like Keir Hardy, who founded the Labour Party. He actually led numerous walkouts in the coal mines because they were bringing in Lithuanian coal miners. If you are a Leftist, or a communist, you should be against free movement because it suppresses wages and it overly benefits the capitalist classes. But like, as you say, Galloway, the thing about mass migration is for a lot of reasons, sort of the Left, so to speak, they just, they love it. They think they enrichment, like, they love multiculturalism. So it’s such a hard nut to crack amongst that demographic of the population.

 

The Ayatollah: One of the things I had in my notes for tonight, if it were going to come up and it kind of, it didn’t in the way I might have thought it would. And it’s a point I’ve made before about the trade unions. The same thing applies to the Labour Party because in theory, they were founded to represent the same interest, the interest of working people. And it just relates to the fact that obviously we’re pretty unanimous in wanting to see the absolute destruction of the Tory Party now, just because of pure spite of what they presided over over the last 14 years.

 

I mean, their treachery goes back much further than that, as it does with Labour, when we sort of the terms in which that’s couched, like, well, look at the horrors the Tories have inflicted upon us for this past 14 years, always either explicitly stated with that or taken as read is, well, they’re supposed to be the ones that look after us. We know Labour will betray us and ethically cleanse us. That’s the Labour Party we’re talking about again, established to represent and govern on behalf of working people.

 

Yet we take it as read that they will be more treacherous than the party of the rich, which is basically what the Tories are.

 

I mean, that tells you first, not that any of us need telling, how utterly poisoned all of our institutions are by the occupation under which we live.

 

But, I mean, it’s funny, David, you mentioned the Labour Party, a one time campaign against the import of Lithuanian miners and that kind of thing. I knew somebody who was a Labour councilor on the south coast at one time and he gave it up basically in the midst of the mid 2010s because of how anti-White they were and because he was becoming more of a nationalist. And he referenced that.

 

And then also that actually reminds me of, funny enough, there’s no Reform candidate standing in my constituency because whoever was standing is utterly spineless. He was worried that Labour might actually beat the Tories in this constituency. So he’s not standing. They can’t put anyone else up now because it’s passed the legal sort of time limit.

 

But I’m going to vote for the SDP in my constituency. Very, very small party, but the Social Democrats are basically a little bit like what blue Labour promised.

 

But, I think that was always a controlled opposition thing as well because it’s run by somebody called Maurice Glassman, but they’re kind of like old Left social Conservatives, anti-immigration and so on.

 

But, yeah, no Reform candidate where I am, but there is an SDP candidate.

 

Natty: Just get blue balls and a blue and white flag. Hey, Tollah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, exactly, mate. Yeah, yeah. Speaking of which, there’s been a score in the football, but anyway, I won’t spoil that for anyone if they’re trying to avoid it.

 

Mark Collett: Right, guys, one last question. And Natty, Tollah’s already ruined it by answering it by mistake. Who are you all going to vote for, if you don’t mind saying? I’ll say, I don’t think I’ve got an English Democrat, or a British Democrat in my constituency. I’ll likely vote Reform just because it’ll be the only thing on the ballot paper that represents anything like my views.

 

And I’ll be voting that as a way to thumb my nose at both Labour and the Tories whilst still going out and voting and not being one of those bums who just sits home and does nothing and allows the rest to say:

 

“Oh, well, you don’t count in the statistics.”

 

What about you, Natty?

 

Natty: Yeah, Reform. There are a couple of independents down here in my constituency who are good as well. But to kick the Tories and kick Labour again, like you said, it’s Reform.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah said SDP. What about you, David?

 

David Clews: Well, I’m going to be. I’m in a purity spiral here.

 

And I’m not voting. I just find the whole thing a farce, to be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Are you going to go and spoil your ballot paper?

 

David Clews: No, I’m not even going to do that. Because that’s in dot. That’s all right. If I was running the show, I would say the best thing to have is nobody voting. Because then the regime has no legitimacy.

 

But obviously people aren’t going to do that.

 

But it’s so stupid. Like, you go in, you tick a wee box. I think they want that because it legitimizes them. Democracy lends legitimacy.

 

Mark Collett: Now, I’m quite the opposite.

 

And I’ll tell you why. If you had 98% of the voter in public went and wrote all rubbish on their ballot paper, they’d have to say the Labour candidate was elected with 1.2% of the vote.

 

And I think that would be a problem for legitimacy. Far more than Labour were elected with 52% of the vote. 90% stayed at home, though.

 

David Clews: I just think the whole democracy. Democracy is a scam!

 

I mean, that was one of the I was reading about the Dune novels and one of the things they said about it is how Frank Herbert showed that people will intrinsically return to basic form. I mean, democracy is, I think, in years to come, people look back and say, what was that all about? For hundreds of thousands of years, you had a leader and you had a people and that was basically it. If you went back 200 years ago and said:

 

“Well, what are you Left-wing? Are you Right-wing? Are you conservative?”

 

They’d be like:

 

“What? I’m out working to put food on my table!”

 

Personally, I think democracy is used as a tool of subversion.

 

Whereas it should be really the strongest in society should rule. And if somebody else wants to come along and overthrow them, then they have to be stronger.

 

But again, look, maybe I’m a bit black pilled by White. I don’t knock people who still vote. I understand why they still do it. It’s like if you look at dissidents during movement, say dissidents in East Germany, like, people still stayed, they still worked, you know, they put out books in their spare time, you know, you. I would be the one jumping over the wall and sitting in West Berlin smoking a cigar, like, do you know what I mean?

 

So I’m not going to be a complete dickhead. I understand why people vote, but I personally think that it’s wrong and it legitimizes the corruption of the system.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, different answers there. Me and Natty, obviously the same, but Tollah is voting. David’s not all legitimate answers. It’s up to every person. I always advise. If there’s not a nationalist candidate, spoil your ballot paper.

 

But I think it’s better to have a say than just to be a guy that stayed at home. But everyone’s entitled to their own opinions.

 

Let’s do these Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted, there’s still 45 minutes of the show left.

 

Obviously, we might run over five minutes if we get too many. I’m hoping not to run over by a long period because these guys are here and it’s boiling hot. It’s about 25 degrees in this room and I feel like I’m about to melt. Open Borders for Israel, $5.

 

The Ayatollah: Thanks so much.

 

Mark Collett: He said:

 

“Did you see the US government designated Nordic Resistant Movement as a terrorist group?”

 

We’ll go around the group on this very quickly. I saw that. I’m sure everyone else did. I find this utterly disgusting! The Nordic Resistance are a registered party in Sweden. They stand in elections and they’ve just been like:

 

“Whoa! Well, there you go. They’re terrorists!”

 

Absolutely scandalous.

 

But I think one of the reasons behind that is to stop international resistance forming. Because now there isn’t any nationalist group in America who can support the Nordic Resistance. Because if they do you know, if they Superchat to a Nordic Resistance, show anything like that could lead to them being prosecuted for supporting a terrorist group. But absolutely scandalous! And the guy who’s done it is obviously Anthony Blinken, who is jewish. Again, it’s jewish power flexing its muscles to attack any form of resistance. What do the rest of you guys think on this?

 

Natty: It definitely has the fear of ZOG lashing out blindly. I’m not sure. Maybe there are machinations I don’t understand. But like you said, they’re a registered party in Sweden, so this just seems really silly to me. And you’re right, it does cut that tie between America and Europe.

 

But I just get the impression that ZOG is just fighting on too many fronts and it’s struggling to contain it. And a move like this, to me, just reeks of that desperation and stupidity.

 

The Ayatollah: Yes, I’ve not got a lot to say. Your summary of it is correct. Mark, just to elaborate or just to add a bit to what Nat is saying there, I think the concern for the current occupation in terms of using everything as a vassal for Israeli interests and jewish interests is certainly Israeli interests geopolitically in that they haven’t got either the young Left or the young Right under control. They had the Right 25 years ago in that age group. They haven’t now. They’re going to probably not find it that easy to get it back, and they’re certainly not going to have the Left. I think that is a big concern from just picking up on what Nat was saying about fighting on too many fronts. That’s a problem that isn’t going to go away. It’s only going to get worse.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, it’s just ridiculous banning these groups.

 

I mean, the problem is it does work because the media are calling them a “terror group”.

 

Therefore, the vast majority of people will read all, a terrorist group’s been banned. It’s a bit like the way they’ve done that here as well with all these, like, even, like his boot to rear. Like, I mean, obviously I’m not a fan of his boot to rear, but they weren’t terrorist group. The band, them, like, they’ll just keep throwing this around and mud sticks at the end of the day and most people will just see the superficial. Well, the band, a terrorist group, one of their members once knew somebody who went somewhere and spoke it breathed air just like Anders Behring Breivik, you know, that’s. They know exactly the game to play. They just throw enough mud out there.

 

But as Natty said, it is a very good point. Like, all the fronts that are being fought on a war in Gaza, war with Hezbollah in the north, a war with people over there, a war with Iran. It is more like the machinations of someone lashing out than someone who’s in power and really in control.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you for that. JakesChannel gave $5 and says:

 

“What a fantastic lineup. Cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show, Mark.”

 

Well, thank you for supporting it. Jakes, really nice to see you here tonight. D sound seven gave $10. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Conservatives delenda est!”

 

Or is it delenda est? Conservatives.

 

I can’t remember which way round the Latin goes, but basically he’s saying:

 

“Death to the Conservatives!”

 

Well, I think that may be happening. And you will see the last thing the Conservatives will see is the grinning face of Nigel Farage as he pours mud into their open grave. Merry Englander gave $5 and said:

 

“Greetings all!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever said:

 

“Don’t forget Tollah is also a rapper. There might be somebody requesting some Tollah rap later.”

 

I don’t know, but that might happen. RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you so much!:

 

“Just a thought. Mark Collett, I would appreciate your comments on Just Stop Oil spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I’ve got a lot of respect for the woman who intervened.”

 

What is the panel’s opinion? I’m going to Fed post now, so if you want to leave the panel, you can.

 

But I got to say this. If I was at Stonehenge with my family and I saw people spraying orange paint over something that’s, I don’t know when it was built. I don’t know when Stonehenge was built, but it was a long time ago and it’s an integral part of our culture. It’s a historic landmark that inspires all the world over. And if I saw these daft idiots spraying it orange, I think I’d run over and punch one of them.

 

And anyone that does run over and punch one of these people who are destroying priceless works of European art, destroying cultural, historical sites, they deserve having a pint bought for them, not being prosecuted.

 

So yeah, my advice is, if you see them, I will buy you a pint. If you punch them. If you see somebody destroying Stonehenge, it’s your moral duty to stop them.

 

Natty: Let me just say as well, I mean, as shocking as it is, it shouldn’t be surprising the people responsible for this have destroyed or attempting to destroy our history, our culture and our people. Cultural vandalism is just small fry to them. And the people who did this work for a lady called Margaret Klein, Salomon. Okay. She’s jewish, so that’s all I’m going to say.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I think with a lot of these psy ops, I think with a lot of them, it’s actually best to ignore them because there’s so many of them now. Like, they’re always up to stuff. These Just Stop Oil people, I think obviously if they engage in criminal damage, they should be arrested.

 

But I think the media actually deliberately pushes Just Stop Oil because that’s part of the net. The Net Zero agenda is to stop oil. So people do stuff all the time. The media will always push Just Stop Oil. They’ll always push these stupid stunts.

 

I think the best thing for these people is to not give them the oxygen of publicity.

 

And I think the fact that the media does give them so much publicity, I think it’s part of the wider Net Zero, because then they can say:

 

“Well, look, people are so outraged that the lack of moves towards a sustainable, decarbonised economy.”

 

And like the one I noticed, like Ash Sarkar, like the stuff she says as well, these people are the suffragettes of the 21st century and like Owen Jones will use that one as well.

 

So they’re these Just Stop Oil people are actually doing the bidding of the state because they agree with kind of the same things, but yet lock them up and throw away the key.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I posted about this earlier when I saw it and basically just. I put it quite simply, I said, if you polled native Britons, I reckon about a third of them would be in favour of people like that. I’ll put it more politely than it is on Telegram being tried and then publicly executed under a benevolent state. I really do. That’s how angry it makes people. That’s how much contempt people have for it because it’s not a popular agenda in the first place. Setting aside, and yeah, David may well have a point. Setting aside, know David’s kind of ideas.

 

And again, he may well be right as to why this is promoted as much as it is. The question I would have there is why the kind of idea of and I’d be open to. Not the discussion for now, but I’d be open to kind of theories on this. Why the effort to kind of get publicity for this through something which is massively unpopular, you would think it’d be counterproductive. But maybe there’s a long game there that like, is beyond my comprehension. It may well be.

 

David Clews: All publicity is good publicity. I think it’s like a suffragette style situation. What was Emily Pankhurst? She threw herself in front of the horse. Everyone would have been whereas now she’s a hero. So I think. Yeah, yeah. About Emily Pankhurst, though, I’ll tell you.

 

Mark Collett: This, the day just stop wheel, go and vandalise an actual state building or.

 

Natty: You know, Holocaust memorial.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a Holocaust memorial or something like that. That’ll be the day they start arresting them. You know, when they go to the Holocaust memorial, the local synagogue, the local mosque, that’s when they’re arresting them, when they’re doing it to churches. Stonehenge, European works of art. It’s all fun and games before because the system hates us. Simpler, ItWasMadeUp, gave 1488. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Great lineup!”

 

Well, thank you so much! Stan1 gave $14. Thanks so much, said:

 

“Great show and great guests. As my granddad once said, embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline!”

 

Thank you so much! ThinRedLine said:

 

“Very interesting.”

 

$14. Thank you so much, my friend. And Eddie gave $16 and said:

 

“Thanks for the stream. Great lineup.”

 

Well, thank you so much! ThinRedLine gave $5, said:

 

“This should be an extra long show.”

 

Well, thank you so much, my friend.

 

Natty: Hold on, hold on. I’ve just had a thought, Mark. You know, you could make about 20% extra on Superchats if we changed 14.88 to 25.66 or something. You know, maybe you’d make $5 a Superchat instead of 14.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, yeah. Maybe we could go even further. 44, 55 or something.

 

David Clews: The problem will be inflation. It will soon be worth, like, nothing. You know, that’s the or it’ll be 1488 quid they’ll have to give you to make it worthwhile.

 

The Ayatollah: Just switch it around for now. 8814.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, if people keep.

 

The Ayatollah: Call it on the drift again, if.

 

Mark Collett: People keep sending in questions, we will answer every question. We always do that within reason. Obviously, if people are sending in joke, you know, two Odysee token Superchats, that doesn’t count. RoryHerbert gave a dollar. Thank you so much, said:

 

“My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UK conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied, Rand Paul. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and must have made a fair amount of money on that advice.”

 

Thank you so much, Rory. I think Farage, just as an aside, I think Farage and Trump were kind of made for each other. I think they are pretty much cut from the same cloth, and I think they’re more interested in many ways in their own sort of destiny and the power that they’re going to receive and their place in history than they are actually what they’re pushing for. And my assertion about Nigel is, I think he is somebody who feels awfully scorned because the system won’t acknowledge him.

 

And the fact the system won’t acknowledge him is something that angers him to the point that he’s now saying, I want to destroy the system to force the Conservative to acknowledge me. I think it’s his anger at the fact a lot of this is is his anger at the fact people won’t acknowledge him. But him and Trump are very similar. I think Trump only fought that first presidential election because people mocked him and said:

 

“You’ll never be able to stand for president.”

 

He was like:

 

“Well, just watch me.”

 

I think there’s a lot of ego in this.

 

David Clews: Sometimes I think I’m guilty of that as well. Like, I think maybe even these people don’t even know that they’re playing a role on the chessboard. Like, they’re doing it for a different reason. And you’re right. They said that when Trump decided to run was when. Remember, they do that roast at Washington and Obama said:

 

“That’s one thing about me is I’m president. That’s one thing you’ll never be as president.”

 

And they said after that was when Trump really, really said:

 

“I’m going to stand, that I’m going to win!”

 

And it’s used to say with Farage, like, these people love honours. Like, he’s probably embittered, he’s not a sir. And it’s such a dif, they just have a different mindset, I think, to the vast majority of us and people who are genuine, they want, it’s like Starmer with all the tool maker stuff. Like, he, remember the people started laughing when he mentioned it. The people were clearly laughing because he brings it up all the time. Starmer went on and complained. He went, I can’t believe in this day and age, people are still laughing that my daddy was a tool maker. He’s a lunatic. Starmer’s a nut job. They operate in just a completely different world, I think, from normal people.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. Does anyone want to add to that? Tollah, I’ve got you.

 

The Ayatollah: Sure?

 

Mark Collett: Unmuted.

 

The Ayatollah: No, nothing to add, mate. Nothing to add.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

The Ayatollah: Just basically agreement on the point of they’re not always. Sorry, just to say they’re not always conscious of the ways in which they’re perhaps being used. Yeah, but I kind of made a similar point earlier on myself, but, yeah, I do agree with that. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. The Resident Baker gave $10. Thank you so much!:

 

“An excellent show tonight, gentlemen.”

 

Well thank you very much, my friend, for the support. It’s Okay to be a Nationalist gave $25. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“If six pointed Starmer and his handlers are so smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media, we’ve reduced immigration! Normies will think he’s a messiah. Great lineup, great show!”

 

There is some debate on this, and that was a generous, supercharged, let’s just say this. There are some people who do believe that under Labour, there will be a reduction of immigration. I don’t think there will be. I think once they’re in power, all things like the like Tories would lie, at least lie and say:

 

“Look, we’re going to do the Rwanda plan, we want to stop the boat. We’re trying to reduce this.”

 

I can’t remember who it was. I think it was one of our guys wrote to their MP saying:

 

“Look, this is all a load of rubbish!”

 

And their MP wrote back and said:

 

“No, no, no. Since we brought in the Rwanda plan, you know, we’ve seen a reduction in people trying to cross the channel. This is working. Part of its a deterrent.”

 

I think once Labour are in the veneer of, we want to do something, will be completely removed. Most of their people are hardcore anti-White. Bring them all in at any cost.

 

And I think under Labour it will get worse. And the reason I believe that is because it has got worse under every successive government. If you track, you know, from the late 1970s to now, you can see an upward trend in migration. And I can’t see that turning around under a government that have done it, that when in opposition, did everything they could to basically.

 

Basically stop any form of migration control that the Tories pretended to bring in.

 

I don’t know if you guys have got any takes on that, or if.

 

Natty: You think just very quickly, over the winter, the Tories claimed that they were stopping the small boats, basically because the weather was so bad that they weren’t crossing the channel. And the lying scumbags in the Tory Party were happy to claim that as a victory.

 

So the Superchatter, I can’t remember his name is, right, yes, they could reduce it by 1%, and they would happily claim that as a kind of win that they could publish in their newspapers.

 

Mark Collett: I remember that, actually. I remember people saying:

 

“You’ve not slowed it down, all you’ve done is capitalised on the weather.”

 

David Clews: That’s one thing, David, I really nailed very early on, is the whole Hegelian dialect. Problem, reaction, solution. They create the problem, they then create the reaction, and then they provide the solution. Yeah.

 

Starmer is utterly shameless in his pursuit of power. Like, say what you want about Corbyn, Corbyn was a genuine Lefty, right? He believed in all this stuff. He wasn’t bought and paid for. He was ultimately very weak, which was why he failed to stand up to the media. But Starmer is a completely empty vessel. And even I think Starmer is even more dangerous than Blair, because Blair, there was something Machiavellian about Blair. Like, Blair loved the power, whereas with Starmer, he is this empty vessel.

 

I mean, I actually have the theory that Starmer was a closet homosexual because he didn’t marry till his forties. Both of his girlfriends he had throughout his life were both Zionists. And he was knighted.

 

And then he meets this nice Israeli lady. I think he’s been groomed for this position. And he was obvious a member of the Trilateral Commission, which is one of these big international NGO’s. He did that whole one with Emily Maitlis. Who would you prioritize, Davos or Westminster? And he said Davos. You know, he is this empty vessel that’s so easy to be shaped.

 

And I think he’s very dangerous. Starmer, more so than any of any of the rest of them.

 

The Ayatollah: Closeted homosexual. A bit like his lookalike, a certain Mr Spencer.

 

David Clews: Supposedly.

 

Natty: Hardly, hardly closeted anymore, is he?

 

The Ayatollah: Who?

 

Mark Collett: Spencer?

 

The Ayatollah: He’s not home when the rubber hits the road.

 

Natty: That’s hot stuff. You can get that at many places.

 

The Ayatollah: Is he really not as intelligent as you think you are?

 

Anyway, enough from me.

 

Mark Collett: No, he’s not.

 

David Clews: As long as there’s no kissing with tongues, it’s not gay. That’s what I heard. At least. That’s the man trial.

 

Mark Collett: What I’ve heard about Richard Spencer is that he. Quite the opposite of that. I’ve actually heard that he’s a bit of a stallion, that he’s a bit of a lady killer, that when the ladies are around big Richard, they know who’s in town. I’ll tell you. That’s what I’ve heard.

 

David Clews: I like Richard Spencer.

 

The Ayatollah: We’re not allowed to like no one else.

 

Natty: The five head herself.

 

David Clews: Richard Spencer is quite funny because the more I look back on it, when he started supporting Biden and supporting the, like, Ukraine war, I actually have a bit of respect for that because he obviously went very contrarian. So I like listening to. I think he’s very, very bright guy, but very narcissistic, though I think it’s fair to say.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m going to say this. I had a bit of a fallout with Richard Spencer live on air, on an episode of the Kill Stream, where we ended up in a little bit of acrimony because he been somebody who’d supported the Covid narrative. And I ended up debating a little bit on. It ended in acrimony, but I’ve always said this since then. He’s the one person I never really wanted to end up debating because I always actually really liked Richard and admired what he did. I thought he put his points over really well. I thought he presented himself in a good way and I don’t want that. I don’t want people in the movement who are high value people going the way he did. Sort of pro-Covid restrictions, pro-Biden, etcetera. He seemed to just go complete contrarian into this mad spiral when he realised that ethno-nationalism wasn’t going to get him exactly where he wanted to overnight. And I found that disappointing.

 

And I’ve always held him in high regard for what he did when he was in the movement.

 

And I think it’s a big loss to the movement that he isn’t with us. You know, a lot of people don’t like that take. They don’t like Richard anymore. I tend to quite like him. I still view him quite fondly. I don’t think he’s gay.

 

Glen19, gave $2. Thanks:

 

“What do you think about the White nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked very more multiracial. I expect, however, Jared Taylor and Delta David Duke were there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a castizo, but it looks like he’s doing well.”

 

I don’t hate Nick Fuentes and I had a big argument on my Telegram with people were very angry with me for saying what I said about him because I said it was sad that his event got cancelled. He’d sold 2,000 tickets. He had 100 strong team setting up at the venue. They cancelled it at the last minute. The venue called the police, threw them all out. Wouldn’t even let them get their stuff out. Absolute scandal!

 

And I think it’s terrible! I think it’s sad. I think it’s sad for the team. And I’ve been in that position where you’re putting on an event, people start bombarding the venue with abuse and the next thing the venue turns on you and you’ve got to pull something together because you’ve got all those people there.

 

And I’ll say this, I can understand that some people don’t like him personally. They might have a personal thing against him. They might say:

 

“He’s not my cup of tea. I don’t like him because of this. I don’t like his sort of whole Catholic thing or whatever.”

 

But I don’t understand why anyone would wish defeat upon a young man who spends the vast majority of his time talking about two things, White genocide and jewish power. He’s putting on a conference with, 20,000 people there, two of whom are Jared Taylor and David Duke. You know, when it comes down to it, I wish him all the best. You know, other people there, like Keith Woods, Jake Shields, there’s plenty of people there.

 

So I don’t really and I hope that America First go on to sue that venue to the point where the venue has to shut down and they end up owning it. That would be my ideal outcome for this. And like, I know Nick Fuentes doesn’t like me. I know that people always say:

 

“Well, he would never come out and bat for you, Mark.”

 

Well, maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he doesn’t like me.

 

But I’m not going to say anything bad about him. And I feel for him, I feel for his team, and I hope they get justice over this scandalous abuse of power.

 

Natty: Well, I know you’re not going to say anything bad about him, but at the risk of being the bad guy here, Nick Fuentes did a deal with Ali Alexander for political power and a time when he knew that Ali Alexander was basically a paedophile and was preying on his fan base. And Nick Fuentes gave him access to this.

 

So it’s very hard for people who know about the backstory of this to support Fuentes, even though he says the right things. This is a guy who’s done very, …

 

David Clews: Did someone not do a deal with Ernst Rohm to get power?

 

Natty: Okay.

 

Mark Collett: Natty literally has been put in his place.

 

David Clews: And I see that if you are in the ruthless pursuit of power, then sometimes you perhaps have to do deals with people that you might not like or agree with. You know, is that is like, I mean, look, obviously that stuff you, I wouldn’t do it. You wouldn’t do it.

 

But, you know, do we not maybe need to be a bit more Machiavellian as Fuente is not quite Machiavellian.

 

Natty: In that way, not in my opinion. And you could do deals with unpleasant people, but brown paedophiles? No, I’m drawing a line on that one.

 

David Clews: But see, the thing about Fuentes as well, I quite like him as well. I think he’s very charismatic. But is it not that he reflects young people and young people live in a multiracial world? People were criticising him, saying, look at all the foreigners. What was he meant to do? Like, these are people he obviously does speak out about White people being in charge. He speaks about Christians being in Charlie. What is he supposed to say? Well, you’re not allowed to come along because you’re not White. What should he do in these situations?

 

Natty: No no no. I’m not saying any of that. They’re all good points. And Mark’s made good points as well.

 

And none of what you guys are saying isn’t true.

 

But this is a guy who gave Ali Alexander knowing who Ali Alexander was, access to his fan base and access to the people who followed him and looked up to him. And that for me is totally reprehensible and is like a line that just should never be crossed.

 

Mark Collett: Do you have any points to make on that, Tollah?

 

The Ayatollah: No, not really. Just sat with a popcorn.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

David Clews: This is not a bit like Baron Harkonnen, like sometimes you need to offer up a young boy as a sacrifice. You know.

 

The Ayatollah: I really do.

 

Natty: David, I really hope you.

 

David Clews: I’m joking.

 

Mark Collett: This is what I like, having David Clews on. He’s the guy that you expect utter maturity and professionalism from, but he will. He never fails to shock and amaze when the time comes.

 

So yeah, thank you for everyone’s points on that. ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Democracy equals plutocracy!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever gave an odysee token. Thank you so much!

 

“If you Just Stop Oil did a protest as a synagogue that have to be renamed Just Stop Moil!”

 

Thank you very much.

 

The Ayatollah: Do you hear any story? There was a story about a Moyle. There was a story about a Moyle in Crown Heights, not far from where those tunnels were discovered at the start of the year, this moil. And he’d been going to work drunk and he got the sack.

 

Natty: Do you know, before this dream started, I realised I was going to have to keep a sharp eye on your jokes because a lot of them just fly over my head, especially when you’re referencing Brittany pop.

 

But that was good. That’s a good one. We’ll take that.

 

The Ayatollah: Cheers. You’re welcome.

 

Mark Collett: Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you so much, my dear. She said:

 

“Good morning. Hope you have a great week.”

 

Thank you very much. Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Do you think Kenny’s party and Alec’s party will form a coalition majority in the next general election? They think. So now can we get an impression from our true leader, the Ayatollah of Alec Yearbury?”

 

The Ayatollah: No, I can’t do an impression of Yearbury. I’m afraid I can’t. It always reminds me of the guy is it Paul Dempsey who used to host the boxing on what is now TNT Sport? But that’s a very obscure reference that no one’s going to get and that’s not going to be satisfactory to people but I think they’ve formed a thing there’s a new division he’s formed continuing the kind of military autism theme called and it’s got an acronym it’s tactical observation surveys and special expeditionary reconnaissance service.

 

So it’s TOSSERS. Yeah, I got that.

 

David Clews: Can I just say as well like from an outside perspective. Like I speak to a lot of people, I try and maintain good relations with as many people. I understand if you’re in the trenches there’s going to be. I find it quite disappointing that there is and I don’t like seeing the whole. There’s so much division. I just, I do think a lot of it is really down to and I was talking about this the other night I think a lot of it is down to the lack of money and this wider movement that we’re in.

 

If you look at the Labour Party so many of these people would love to probably strangle each other but at the end of the day they’re an MP, they’ve got ninety! A year in an office in London or they’re a researcher, they’ve got 30 year. I mean you imagine if we as a movement were able to pay just what I see, a wider nationalist movement. You were able to pay 50 people 25, 30 grand a year. I mean you’re not buying silence. You’re going to have people more likely to just say:

 

“Well look, we’re going to have to do this.”

 

And again, any sort of fledgling revolutionary movement from history, it’s had a lot of money whether it was on the Right, whether it was on the left. Whereas you know, now people spend their money on their holidays, they spend their money on going to the football. You know that’s why I do see this and I’m glad to see people support you, Mark, people need to support content creators. They need to because it just becomes a situation where you do like the easiest thing to do is just go and show for Israel like I could just turn my Twitter off tonight and just become Ollie of London and just start, you know, push and you get 10, 20 grand a month. You know, doing what we do is so hard.

 

And I think there’s a lot of energy and frustration and again, fundamentally, intellects, which is one of the problems, I think, on this wider movement, which does have a lot of different aspects of it, and it is hard to keep it united because you have a lot of very intelligent people.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I say this.

 

One of the things I do find tiring is this constant nonsense where people say:

 

“Oh, it’s the grift, mate, it’s the grift. People do it for an easy life.”

 

Well, you can total up the donations I made on the stream tonight so far, and it’s under $200. You know, that’s not if it was ten times that, I could understand people saying:

 

“Oh, the grift, it’s an easy life!”

 

Look, but it’s not an easy life. And outside of really those huge American shows where the big American donors are chucking in huge, huge sort of silly kind of money, there isn’t vast sums of money in this. And I don’t know anyone that’s really come out of ethno-nationalism as a millionaire. It just doesn’t happen. To suggest that people have put their lives, families, etc., at risk. They, you know, some people have been jailed, they’ve lost their bank accounts and then people are whining because there’s a couple of Superchats over a two hour stream. It’s pathetic, to be honest!

 

The Ayatollah: Same people will pay for Netflix and whatever else in a lot of cases as well. Not all of them, but a lot of them. I mean, we used to get called grifters on the Tasob podcast when we didn’t even take donations. So frankly, people talk out their asses.

 

Natty: Well, the, I mean, you’ve, Mark, you’ve kind of answered your own question, or you’ve answered David’s question there. The reason we’re ideologues, we have an ideology, that’s why we can’t get on with each other. And because we’re rigid and hard line and there’s no money in it. There’s grifters could get on with each other. If you’re making a hell of a lot of money, you’d be willing to compromise and do things with other grifters of a different stripe. But no, we’re not in that channel.

 

David Clews: That’s an excellent point, Natty, because in my shows, I show the sort of nexus, the way they’re all linked, like Russell Brands, all LinkedIn, Joe Rogan, they all, Trigernometry, they all go on each other’s shows. They all benefit each other. And they will never actually have an honest conversation about race. They would never have an honest conversation about the role of jewish power in the world.

 

And again, I don’t necessarily see my points out of anything ideological. These are just real. It’s like saying:

 

“This is a bottle of water. And then well, actually, it’s not. It’s a plastic.”

 

You know, these people are doing everything they possibly can to evade talking about what is really going on. It’s so annoying because when you actually talk about what is really going on, people want to go and listen to, like, Russell Brand or they want to go and listen to Alex Jones. It lulls them into this sense of security that. All right. Okay. That’s easier for me to understand what’s going. Look, here is the problem. This is why. This is the history. They don’t want to know about it.

 

Mark Collett: Right.

 

Next Superchat, Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave another $3. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Also.”

 

Natty: That’s your takes.

 

Mark Collett: Also, could Tollah do the dead man shoes scene, but instead have Marcus Richard and Tommy Robinson as the other guy? That would be class.

 

The Ayatollah: I can try. So what was it? Marcus Richard. Right. Okay. I’ll have a go. Bear with me a second.

 

Mark Collett: I love this scene.

 

Natty: Is this the scene where he gets out the car?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, that’s the one.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: If you’ll bear with me a second while I find me text so, I can’t remember it off the top me head. I’m liable to.

 

Mark Collett: I really like the film Dead Man’s Shoes. And the film-maker, he really did. He really did sort of sum up these sort of like sink that.

 

The Ayatollah: The sink.

 

Mark Collett: Estate. Life in these bad areas and how people live. I thought it was really well made.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Small.

 

Natty: Small town thugs. Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: The fact they’re all driving around in that crap old car, you know.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, I’ll give it a go. Yeah. Okay. So I’ll check. I’ll change the names accordingly if I remember to as well. Right:

 

“Well, mate, how you doing, Mark? You okay? Yeah. You know, the lads of this ridiculous idea that. Yeah, it was me. I was for. So we up to mooching about. Mooching about in my house? Yeah. Jaws pipe. Men like women. What are you doing, lad? That’s my concern. Not when you’re in my house. Where are you staying? Motson’s farm. You’re gonna come and see me, are you? Maybe I will. Not Friday me? Are you just all chinning? Hang on. He’s weighing it up. He’s weighing it up. Shut up! Making me very nervous, Mark. Well, you should be. If I were you, I’d get in that fucking car and I get out of here, man. And I gather them goonies and get whatever you’ve got and come at me. Cause believe me, I’m gonna fucking hit you all. I don’t like being threatened, Mark. Not threatening you, mate. It’s beyond fucking words! Watched over you when you were asleep and I looked at your fucking neck and I was that far away from slicing it. You’re fucking there, mate. So get in that car and fuck off! You get to me first. I just might.”

 

Oh, yeah. That’s it!

 

Doesn’t really work.

 

Mark Collett: I like the way you added the sniffs for Tommy.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I had to ad lib the odd bit of it as well.

 

But, yeah, it doesn’t quite carry over because you can’t really imagine Tommy Robinson speaking in a hushed voice, can you?

 

Mark Collett: You can’t. Gus in Lanzarote gave $5. Gus, I have posted your items. And he said:

 

“The Reform candidate resigned just for saying vote. Resigned just for saying vote BNP in 2010. Even Sivnat Sargon stood up to the liberal media bullies about online comments because boomers have had lives of security. Does this give a dread of being an outsider? Pariah. Pariah. >Hence they cuck.”

 

Yeah. What do you guys think about this? One of these Reform candidates has actually resigned and walked away. And he’s been hounded out just for saying that people should vote BNP 14 years ago.

 

Natty: At some point they’re going to run out. They’re going to run out of clean cut candidates and everyone’s going to have said something like:

 

“Yeah, maybe we shouldn’t have fought the Nazis, or, yeah, maybe the BNP were right about immigration.”

 

Or whatever.

 

So, yeah, there’s a limit. How many people Hope Not Hate can highlight for them to kick out. And some people are going to fold. People have their own considerations. But at some point that does start losing power and doxing starts losing power and all this kind of opposite research starts losing power. It is powerful, don’t get me wrong. And people, like I said, people are going to walk away, but at some point, that just doesn’t hold sway anymore.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, Reformed a good term for this in their statement, didn’t they? Sorry, just a quick point. They termed it in their statement after what Ian Gribbon, who, by the way, incidentally, half jewish, their candidate for Backs Hill and Battle, who said the things about we should have stayed neutral with regard to Germany in the forties, thirties and forties. They had a good term for it. They called it “offence archaeology”. And I mean, actually that their statement, and anyone can go and find it, they basically said:

 

“Look, he’s saying something that people thought was true at the time and it probably is true, we’re not endorsing it, but it is true.”

 

So it was an amazing statement. They put out, like, a lot of us would have been proud of that statement. They played that one quite well and I was surprised they would say something so basically heretical to say, we shouldn’t have fought them, we should have stayed out of that wall and objectively we would have been better off doing that.

 

But yeah, there we are.

 

David Clews: I think anything that’s done to shrink the Overton Window is bad. Thing is, if you’re going to cut to Hope Not Hate, if you’re going to allow Nick Molé’s to decide, are you honestly going to come in and you’re going to take down the international power structure? It just shows you how weak they are.

 

And I actually had a bit of a not falling out. I got annoyed the other week at Galloway’s party. They kicked a guy out because apparently he made Islamophobic comments and I actually got in touch. I said:

 

“Look, this guy’s clearly done nothing wrong here. Why are you playing that game?”

 

It’s just, it has to be. If people have said things that Hope Not Hate, find offensive, no one should ever buckle to these people on anything. Obviously, if it’s something that is beyond the pale, like say an Ali Alexander situation or something like that, or the conduct of a candidate, that’s very different. But on free speech, people expressing an opinion on the Second World War on anything, you have to stick by your candidates and your people and not throw them under a bus.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! Snake, Using a Real Snake, gave $5.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“I feel a system have wheeled out Farage to take the energy from those who voted for the Tories. In 2019, Labour will take a big win as a licenced to make huge unannounced, pre-planned seismic changes to society via the 1997 CP to Hitchens.”

 

I think we’ve all said that actually, is that. I mean thank you for the Superchat, but I do believe that is literally the point we’ve all made tonight. Would you all agree?

 

Natty: Yeah, Tony Blair didn’t stand on mass immigration, but that’s what we got.

 

So you’re going to get the same thing here.

 

Mark Collett: A Snake, Using a Real Snake gave another $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Keir Starmer is largely funded by a Trevor Chin, president of Israel based UJIA [United Jewish Israel Appeal], and he’s also on the executive board of Viacom, the largest Israel lobby group in the UK. Viacom is headed by a Richard Peter. Who was formerly employed by the Israeli prime minister’s office. And it is still an IDF reserve.”

 

I didn’t know any of that. Did any of you guys know that? I’m actually going to make a note of that.

 

David Clews: Yeah. Yeah. One of Starmer’s other biggest funders, a guy called Gary Lubner and whose son is now head of Labour Youth, Gary Lubner was brought up in South Africa. Auto glass. Ran the auto glass chair. Ultra, ultra Zionist. I think he gave. Let me actually tell you how much Jack Lubner. Sorry, Gary Lubner gave to Labour. Gary Lubner Labour. He gave 13 million quid to the Labour Party. A guy called Gary Lubner. So like, Starmer’s Left-wing Zionist control, Keir Starmer and that they bankrolled him. Huge sums of money. 13 million this guy’s given to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ve just Googled that Viacom, you know, British Israel communications and research centre. And yeah, if that is all true and he’s being funded by them, I mean he tells you everything you need to know, really. Ants Alligate $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Happy that four of my favourite lads are together on PWR tonight. Loving David Clews, Unity News channel. I rely on him for the real news now. He has a unique presentation style that I really enjoy. Big hit with the ladies.”

 

David Clews: David, how do you feel to be expected? Happens to me if I can get home without being accosted by gangs of gorgeous 20 something women. It’s a good day.

 

Mark Collett: Very good. Jay Bradley gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Communism, capitalism are two sides of the same coin. Both are jewish. They’re in too deep. No voting our way out of this one.”

 

Well, thank you very much. The David Clews fan there. AlbionForever. I know we would have done that one. Scaredycat. $4. Thank you so much!:

 

“Hi, David. Ayatollah Natty and Mark, is it possible to introduce Sheikh Imran Hussein to Mark? I think your newspaper interviewed him. Right now he’s in Malaysia, then Indonesia onto Armenia and then Russia, eventually to stop over in England on his way home. To Trinidad, the Caribbean island. He organised emigration.”

 

But if there’s people that are interesting, I will talk to them. I get into trouble for doing this. I did the Dilly Hussein interview. People were very angry about that. At one point, I spoke to those black lads down in London. I really enjoyed the trip down there for the day. That was interesting. And I’ve said to other people that I would be more than happy to have Muslims on here.

 

In fact, I actually did an interview with a member of the Syrian government during the war in Syria when that was on. And that was an interesting. That was an interesting chat. And he was literally saying:

 

“Look, you know, we don’t want our people going over to the UK. We’re against you guys disappearing, you know.”

 

Very interesting.

 

So, yeah, I’d be open to that. Does anyone want to add anything to this?

 

David Clews: No. No, I don’t know. Who is he? Who is he?

 

Mark Collett: I have to Google him.

 

David Clews: Just on. Without mentioning the name, there’s actually some news that’s come out tonight that the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, has said that Cyprus is being used by the Israeli air force to launch attacks on Lebanon because geographically, Cyprus there. So he said:

 

“If a war takes place, then Cyprus would be within their crosshairs.”

 

Now, who, which country has a lot of Air Force bases on Cyprus? We do! These air forces are clearly being used.

 

So, yeah, have a look at the that stuff. He’s made a speech that’s being regarded as quite incendiary, that if, because it looks like Israel are going to launch. They’ve got bored of Gaza, they’re going to launch a ground operation in southern Lebanon.

 

And again, these Hezbollah aren’t Hamas. They’ve got, he says, 100,000 people. They’ve got some serious weapons and that if you want a pretext to war with Iran, well, we’ve got British interests on Cyprus. They’ve got missiles that can hit us.

 

Mark Collett: You know, look, I’ll tell you this as well, and I know it’s running over slightly, so we’ve got a couple more Superchats.

 

But one thing that has, or should be shocking the current world order is the way that these very expensive, very complex, state of the art tanks are getting completely wrecked both in the open battlefields of the Ukraine and in the cramped ruins of Gaza city. I have seen videos of Israeli tanks being, you know, dozens of them being destroyed by guys who have got state of the art, shoulder mounted, armour piercing rocket launchers. And you’re seeing a crew being completely, you know, turned to jam on the inside. And a piece of equipment that’s probably worth, I don’t know, a couple of million for a tank. Is a tank a couple of million?

 

Natty: Probably much, much more than a couple of million.

 

Mark Collett: Well, okay, well, let’s say it’s 10 million. How much is it to train the troops in there? How easy is to replace that once they’ve been trained? War is changing. And I would say this, the fact, and this is really for a different show, but the fact that the war cabinet in Israel is breaking down, I think it’s in no small part to the fact that they’ve rolled into Gaza and it hasn’t been the pushover they thought it was going to be. I think they’ve got spanked.

 

And the problem is, today you’ve got two types of war. You either obliterate from the air, and I mean obliterate to the point where literally nothing’s left. You know, there’s not a rat, there’s not a cockroach, nothing. Or you have a meat grinder. It’s either obliterate or your own troops are getting chewed up. It’s as simple as that.

 

David Clews: Well, that’s what Putin could have done that to Ukraine.

 

The Ayatollah: Or it’s Ukraine now.

 

David Clews: Yeah, that’s right. I mean, Putin could have flattened, they could flatten Kiev, they could flatten all these cities in Ukraine.

 

But again, not simping for Putin, but he clearly doesn’t do that.

 

And as you’re right, Mark, it’s either you just carpet bomb the place or you have a meat grinder. And that’s what it is.

 

And I think it’s just these people go on about how civilised they are. I think it’s a terrible situation that we are, 2024, and they’re leading us towards this war.

 

And I think I’ve met a lot of you guys. They talk about blood thirst and bloodlust. You know, I’ve never met anyone that says:

 

“Yet, war is a great thing. We need to do it!”

 

It’s crazy, crazy times.

 

Mark Collett: Right? AlbionForever said:

 

“Nativist bars.”

 

Thank you so much! Anti Mattoid gave $59.12.

 

Thank you so much for such a generous donation. And he said:

 

“Great show!”

 

Well, I’m pleased you enjoyed it so much, my friend. ScaredyCat gave $4.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“Hi again, Mark, David, Ayatollah, Natty, Sheikh Imran Hussein. Samir was born in London but emigrated to Morocco and openly invites Muslims in the West on YouTube to settle back in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their new country. Sheikh in previous years did this in Pakistan.”

 

Well, look, if you’ve got a Muslim scholar that wants to speak to me and you can put this guy in touch with me, and he is somebody who has the same opinion on us that we don’t want war between Christians and Muslims, but we do want a peaceful separation. You know, I don’t want a war, but I don’t want multiculturalism either. I don’t want a war because I want peaceful separation. And if there are Muslims or blacks or from any other racial group that have the same ethno-nationalist leanings as us and want a peaceful separation and a re-migration of people in the West to elsewhere in the world, I would absolutely hold out a hand of friendship and, yeah, that would be great! And I’m sure David would interview someone like as well, because David interviews anyone, usually with hilarious consequences.

 

David Clews: Anyway, you should be open.

 

The Ayatollah: Malaysia, then Indonesia, Armenia, Russia. Sorry. Go on, mate. Go on.

 

David Clews: You know, I think everyone should be open minded too. I think if there is a threat of a war, like, because clearly if there’s a war, it doesn’t matter if you’re a ethno-nationalists, civic nationalists or whatever, like, it’s not going to end well.

 

So I think if they do keep ramping this war rate to the cup, I think speaking with as many people as possible is healthy and to try and stop this.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And the interesting thing with ethno-nationalism, real ethno-nationalism, you see, one last thing I’ll say to sum up on this issue, and everyone can have the same, we’ll close it down. We’re not going over by a massive amount of time. But genuinely, when I see the Tommy lads and like I said this about Anne Marie Waters a long time ago when she was talking about the need to invade Iran, the real hatred actually comes from these sort of civn ats who are playing the system’s game because they see Muslims.

 

And their natural response to the conflict between Whites and Muslims in this country is to level every single Muslim country in the Middle East, slaughter as many as possible, and they’re all cheering for that. I absolutely don’t want that! I understand that this conflict is created by the globalists in order to fracture, atomize and create a state where you will not have a homogeneous force that can overthrow the globalists.

 

Henceforth, we need peaceful separatism.

 

And one thing that we absolutely don’t want is more war, because more war creates refugees who end up coming. Coming here to the West, that is a succinct worldview. The worldview of, say, like the Tommy people or the Anne Marie Waters’ people when they’ve both, respectively pushed this line is one that ultimately leads to more problems and ironically, to more Muslim immigration.

 

So I would absolutely speak to these people.

 

Anyway, it’s been a wonderful show tonight.

 

I’d like to thank all these great guests, Natty, Tollah and David, if you’d all like to say you goodbyes, shill your own work. And then me and Natty have got our little gay announcement to come at the end and then we’ll shut things down.

 

Natty: Well, I’ll save my goodbyes until you make your announcement, but thanks, everyone. It’s been a pleasure.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, okay, I’ll be in forever.

 

Basically was being cheap. He was requesting for me to wrap when he did Nativist bars. So I’ll oblige him as quickly as I can with some that’s been sanitized.

 

So this is in character as Nativist is concerned:

 

“Been the scourge of the noses since I co-founded TASOB making more black sons and De Niro and Azov ZOG sweating buckets because I’m sticking the boot in. And I got more lines in the civn at from Luton. Catch me every month on the PA film review. World’s greatest movie critic for naming the jew. And I’m teaching young nationalists about strategy and planning a set of made up trials. Like Katie Fanning still telling all the birds about the Nat Soc solution. And I’m picking up more tens and Pearl Jams distribution. We’re going to save the White race and I’m the best of those trying. Best chapters lie ahead in the life of Ryan.”

 

That’s me done. Thanks for having me. Good night.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. David, shill your work and then me.

 

David Clews: And very, very impressive. Can I just say what absolutely fantastic show. Pleasure to be here with Tollah and Natty and yourself, Mark. Really interesting, deep, thorough conversation and it’s always good to be around people that have such a good knowledge and including the audience as well, that have a knowledge of what is going on. Like obviously some people will have different conclusions, they will interpret things differently.

 

But the thing that really pisses me off the most is so much of the Right, even the Left or whatever. It’s so superficial. There is no in depth analysis done on anything and it’s terrible! You need people more researched. You need people understanding. You need a penetrative analysis.

 

And that’s why I think conversations like this are so good! So thanks to everyone, and thanks very much for your audience for the warm welcome as well.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, we’ve got one little final announcement. Tonight, Natty, being a kind and loving brotherly friend, was good enough to gift me Helldivers 2, at the weekend on steam. So me and him are doing a special brotherly stream on Sunday night, killing bugs as space marines. What do you have to say about this, Natty?

 

Natty: It’s going to be absolutely epic. I’m going to drag you, drag you into the modern age of gaming. No more side scrolling, platforming, eight bitness crappy, crappy games we’re playing. Hell, we’re dropping onto hostile planets and we’re going to be dropping napalm on bugs, flaming them out, rocket launchers, the whole shebang. So look forward to that one.

 

Mark Collett: Look forward to that. Sunday night, 07:00 pm well, look, I just want to thank everyone again. Thank you to Natty, Tollah, and David. Support these guys. I genuinely love all these fellows, and when I got a chance to stream with them all tonight, I was over the moon. I hope you’ve enjoyed it as much as I have. It’s been a very fast moving and informative show. We don’t often do panels like this, but please support all these guys because they all do so much for this cause.

 

And all of them are people that actually want to work together towards some kind of unity to do something positive. You know, these aren’t the back biting people. These aren’t the people in the dark depths of Telegram stirring things up. They’re all powerful content creators working together in the real world for change. Support these guys. I love them all. Thank you so much! Thank you to everyone, Natty, Tollah, David, thank you to all those who generously donated. I couldn’t do this without your continued support. You know, if I didn’t get donations, if I didn’t get people Superchats, I wouldn’t be able to afford to do this. It’s as simple as that.

 

So thank you for keeping this show going for as long as it’s been going. 267 episodes plus 100 episodes of Tutar before it. And thank you most of all to everyone who tunes in on a weekly basis. I’ll see you all again next week, hopefully see you on Sunday when I’ll be playing with Natty. Until then, stay strong. Keep fighting. Good night.

 

The Ayatollah: I love you all.

 

Mark Collett: See you all soon. Thank you. Bye.

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/23/2024 = 916)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

2
4
Hide replies

@Trevor
3 days ago
Labour will be in deep shit within 6 months to a year. If they dare put taxes up ever so slightly the Tory media will lambast them deliberately forgetting that their party are the ones who gave us the highest ever tax burden
The Tory Right are becoming unhinged in terms of who they want to throw under the bus: the sick, the disabled, the unemployed – and for many of the younger Tories, the elderly
I don’t think Labour will be overtly anti-white but they are very likely to crack down on dissidents. I think the panel are right that war is coming and it’s going to be disastrous for a society as atomised, as selfish and as ethnically divided as this one is. We are also grossly over-dependent on food imports

2
0

@Trevor
3 days ago(edited)
Having gone to a private school myself I am completely ambivalent about them paying VAT on the fees. This society is dominated by the privately educated, it’s they who are running it off a cliff and having been educated at such a place, I can tell you that from day one you are encouraged to view the rest of society as being beneath you
David Clews is a bit contradictory on that – he’s talking about the politics of envy on private school fees yet knocking “boomers” for benefitting from higher interest rates. I guarantee bashing boomers will backfire on people – that generation’s property is being eyed up by the asset management firms and it won’t be passed onto their kids.

1
0
Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be patient with those in our movement. We may not agree on everything but thats ok

7
0
Fancy
3 days ago
THEY need people to sign up willingly. The only way to do that is a false flag so we all think we are the good guys fighting terror. remind you of anything ?

4
0

@What3
3 days ago
best stream ever. high level political analysis, i agree with the clews fella on sunak, sunak is throwing it. zog is getting all their ducks in a row for war with iran/russia and their proxies

3
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
the west is not in anyway ready to fight a war against anyone

1
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
Dave & Tollah both are hilarious

2
0

@ИванКожедуб
2 days ago(edited)
All Star Panel! Great show.
Disabling splats was gay though.

@MarkCollett
, or anyone: can you link the photo of Farage with his arm round Thomas-Bowen? I can’t find it, or any reference to it.

1
0

@xero
3 days ago
1:42:59
top notch lmao

1
0
Henry
3 days ago
What is the point of the Lib Dems? I don’t get it.

0
1
Henry
3 days ago
Likud (The House) always wins!

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

0
1
Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Beau and Dan got chipped from Reform… and they’re with The lotus eaters

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

0
1

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I’m quite bored by the general election, but this show was actually really interesting. Great stream, great guests.

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
bugs and terminators.

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

0
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
nothing better than spending the evening on Tgram watching dirt poor sandal clad orphaned Palestinian kid’s yeeting IDF hiding in their billions of dollars armor tanks

1
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I called it from the start, Israel will defacto loose this war

2
1

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Mark Collett on Britain going to war with Germany:

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

0
2
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
^^

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

0
2
Chief Moody
3 days ago
I’ll be streaming tomorrow, guys

1
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David Clews has been a great addition I hope he returns

1
1
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
HiAgain, Mark,David,Ayatollah & Natty: Sheikh Imran Hosein’s student “Sameer” was born in London, but emigrated 2 Morocco & openly invites Muslims in West on YouTube 2 settle in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their “new” country. Sheikh inPreviousYears did this in Pakistan.

0
2
danzimmons
3 days ago
Nick was great on Periscope, every since getting his first $500K Bitcoin he’s been doing nothing but cucking

1
3
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
I cant understand those who Cuck once they have enough Surely the best thing about having the £$ should be not having to worry about being sacked/ cancelled- Farage is the same

Honkey
3 days ago
hopefully AF wins huge damages $$$$

1
1
Henry
2 days ago
This guy is spreading lies about nick fuentes and ali alexander. You should ban Natty.

2
5
Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
How is it a lie? Ali Alexander was messaging a 15yr old boy who was part of AF

5
0

@JohnConnor
2 days ago
Are you non White? If the answer is no, get your head out of your behind about spic Fuentes

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

1
2

@Glen19
3 days ago
$2.00
What did you think about the White Nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked more multiracial than I would expect. However, Jared Taylor & Dr. David Duke was there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a Castizo but looks like he is doing well.

2
5
Hide replies
Henry
3 days ago
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
5
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
Hi, David,Ayatollah,Natty & Mark: Is itPossible 2 introduce Sheikh Imran Hosein 2 Mark ? I think YourNewspaper interviewed him. RightNow he is inMalaysia, then Indonesia, onto Armenia & Russia, eventually 2 stopover in England on his way home in Trinidad, the Caribbean island. .HeOrganizedEmigration

1
3
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Phew. Thankfully Mr Clews didn’t have a Freudian moment @
1:24:00
when he said “these stupid stunts” in reference to disruptive attention seeking actions by the likes of Stop Oil

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
Didnt know about the Nonce aspect to Ali Alexander I remember Alex Jones fawning to him because he is Non White Once again Alex picks a winner! Not the greatest judge of strategy or men If he led an Army regiment back in ye Olden days he’d do a Custer & get himself + everyone else wiped out Best not invite him on PWR or the show will be shut down the next day!

Stolen Content
2 days ago
1:16:00
the «rant» may be close to over and I am unaware who the gentleman bottom rigth is, but Mark: you should jews his words.
There is no white and black pill that is coming your way with Farrage..
He is granted his words to prove to the fence-sitting elite that you common people now like 80 years ago felt the same, thus justifying your complete and final remowal

Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
Interesting take

@filled_soda
2 days ago
Great stream!

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I appreciate Mark’s succinct comment about WWII being about maintaining the current bankers monopoly on currency. This needs to be repeated until everyone understands.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
the power of one! the power of two! the power of maany

withey
3 days ago
goodnight all

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Great stream 1488 o/

Honkey
3 days ago
great show o/

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/ tollah

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@why
Odysee and Rumble:

@TheAyatollah
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews on the show

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Thank you, great stream.

danzimmons
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
I bet spencer had a go on it

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@danzimmons
LMAO

@why
3 days ago
And you have something against the number 3???

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
she has already been on maybe twice

danzimmons
3 days ago
Natty

Natty
3 days ago

@danzimmons
absolute kek

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes remigration

@why
3 days ago
Have Syrian Girl on, just so we can simp…

@why
3 days ago
Gen Z aint fighting, theyre more radical than we are

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago
<0.01
based dungarees please Tollah

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Thanks folks. Till next time.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Great show

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Hahahaha the Katie Fanning line

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good night good folks. Thanks everyone for attending the stream.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
yes agreed

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@why
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Great show tonight.

@why
3 days ago
where is tollah streaming now?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
That didn’t sound good lol.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Gay announcement ?

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@Natty
evening mate

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
amen

@Joesmith
3 days ago
14

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
we’re the most desirable in the world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
militarily speaking russia cannot keep it up for more than 2 years from now. they don’t have the demographics for it, they are imploding. 2nd they need to plug 3 more sensitive areas if they are to feel safe as they were in 1952. plus china already took territory from them in the east.

@why
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
they lost a sperg who cucked

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
have

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
they should

@why
3 days ago
gay

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘The drip’s the best part!’

@why
3 days ago
needed the minecraft music

Natty
3 days ago
fanatastic

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
What did they expect? The Palestinians are fighting off extinction.

@cheflad
3 days ago
if you listen to Scott Ritter ,the IDF are taking a beating and are totally demoralised

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Honkey
3 days ago
Cyprus didnt learn its lesson in the Kitos War

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Kinda would like some more attention on American topics also

@why
3 days ago
get george galloway on

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett | Interview on Blood Brothers Podcast:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks again for donating.

@why
3 days ago
these are the best interviews mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David the Chad

Honkey
3 days ago
nice dono o/

@AntiMattoid

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
lol

@why
3 days ago
j’s would never cuck, they would just say he was having a bad day because of holohoax anxiety

@Diogenes
3 days ago
y

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
agreed

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AntiMattoid
Thanks for your generous donation!

Anti Mattoid
3 days ago
$59.12
Great show.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@cheflad
3 days ago
ar least we’re not Speaking German

@why
3 days ago
you just need to make it as an MP once and youve made it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Katie taking a doing

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
LMAO

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
It’s not looking good.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
I’m going to have to watch it again.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The sniffing hahaha

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
<0.01
Nativist Bars

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dead Man’s Shoes:
https://tinyurl.com/3wyw42md

@Joesmith
3 days ago
i use to hang around mannor house because of some lass

@why
3 days ago
bullying each other

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Perhaps they are a lost cause and are destined to be useful morons?

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
An autistic 14 year old got nicked a few weeks ago for just possessing those documents, Charlie got extradited from Spain, but this particular guy, nothing. Nothing to see here…

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO again.

@why
3 days ago
best name on the internet

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
Drinking overpriced food and beer. Plus murderous fees for parking.

@why
3 days ago
embrace the sperg

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I got free tickets to a NFL game and the amount of normies screaming their idiotic heads off is astounding

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
I never knew him, but that’s irrelevant. As soon as I saw he has not been arrested for doing something that autistic teenagers get nicked for, I knew he was a state asset.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
so true

@why
3 days ago
and we’re all spergs lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I never liked that particular lad. There was always something not right about him.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Egotism is partly the problem with Nationalism

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
possibly. but the state doesn’t give out free passes on terror offences in exchange for nothing…

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I’d say that sounds like strategic by the state.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes pay your tidings

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
When I became aware of that, I knew they were a fed op without a shadow of a doubt.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Indeed.

danzimmons
3 days ago
#David Clews is NOT gay. x10

@cheflad
3 days ago
i get it ,Paul Dempsey is a top footy commentator as well.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
good name

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks for your consistent and loyal support.

@hunter
3 days ago
miss tasob

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Quid pro quo perhaps.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
cancel netflix pay your tidings

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The country is burning but hey…is the football game on?

@cheflad
3 days ago
go and ask Sam & Laura if its an easy life.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
mexican catboy made his million

@why
3 days ago
Ralph did ok for a while, the gunt.. cant abort the retort

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Fed, gay, jew, or grifter. The classic divisive accusations.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
it is a meager existance

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Isn’t it interesting how Homeland’s second in command got let off sharing the same links as Charlie Big Potatoes?

@why
3 days ago
Clews News…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like David Clews

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I had to spell it “moil” because Mark would pronounce mohel “mo-hel”

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO

danzimmons
3 days ago
think about the children just stop moils

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
that is kind of a joke, he meant you shouldn’t let your desires/vices govern you

@why
3 days ago
catboys not gay

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
HAHAHAHA

@why
3 days ago

@Charles
bruh

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
when even gaped alaska ended up as an informant

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Natty is right

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Dont think there’s any evidence Nick is gay

@MrRoboto
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
he also recieved about 1m quid in BTC a few days before jan 6th

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@hunter
3 days ago
is that true?

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Was that 100% confirmed. Because I heard a slightly different story… But I don’t know

14Reasons
3 days ago
“having sex with women is gay”

@why
3 days ago
nice was there in jan 6th as well and got away scot free

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Fuentes said that women were pedophiles

14Reasons
3 days ago
fuentes is a homosexual. is he not?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be good if Nick matured a bit more

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Unfortunately Fuentes rubs a lot of people the wrong way.

@Glen19
3 days ago
we can treat them all universally with contempt

@Glen19
3 days ago
I don’t care if a pedo is brown or not. lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like him

@Diogenes
3 days ago
I like Nick but the virgin queen Chihuahua is a hilarious nickname

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Spencer is camp as a row of tents

danzimmons
3 days ago
Fuentes is gud at getting free publicity, and that’s it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Keith Woods was there too

@DissidentZelda
3 days ago
Thank you.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
exactly

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Gay pedo rates are insane and yet no one in the mainstream even dares speak of the reality

@why
3 days ago
laura loomer also

danzimmons
3 days ago
is it true that a chic got hi on shrooms & stooped Dr. Duke

The Crucible 01
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
the event was cancelled Thursday and nick didnt say anything until Saturday

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Gays adopt kids so they can abuse them

@why
3 days ago
greg and his “merry men”

@Diogenes
3 days ago
if you say down with Israel no venue in Western World

The Crucible 01
3 days ago
nick fuentes is an obvious grifter

@MarkCollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Honkey
I think they will

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@why
Grindr is full of pedos and big surprise…a Israeli Jay created the app

@why
3 days ago
his russia missus has a proper pair of norks

@alpha007org
3 days ago
I heard months/weeks before Trump got elected, there were promises of gov. jobs. But then 180 turn. And Richy got mad. that’s all.

@BillBikes
3 days ago
Gaayyyyyyy!

Honkey
3 days ago
AF isnt “white nationalist”

danzimmons
3 days ago
Ninart Spencer was always a clout chasing fa@@et

@why
3 days ago
RS deffo not gay

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Donate via the PA website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations

Natty
3 days ago
yeah guys i know he’s probably not actually gay, but chasing novelty takes for rage bait is pretty gay

Honkey
3 days ago
supporting Biden is just absurd

@Glen19
3 days ago
I hated the COVID nonsense that went on. There is no mass death coming.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
we should try and stand together

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That speech he gave at Auburn university in 2017 was brilliant too. Shame what happened to him.

@why
3 days ago
grindr greg

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Diogenes
yes

Stan1
3 days ago
thought you were talking about Frank doh

@Diogenes
3 days ago
ask Faith Goldy

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Both are gay?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Excellent spot on example. Thanks

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
TO be fair, those old NPI propaganda videos were brilliant.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@why
3 days ago
he’s shagged everything

Honkey
3 days ago
haha

@why
3 days ago
nah hes not

@why
3 days ago
lol

Merry_Englander
3 days ago

@Charles
That’s pretty much what happened with Liberia.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol kuer starmer the hotdog stormer

@why
3 days ago
He’s probably mi5

@why
3 days ago
he spent 5 years in northern ireland working for the police

@Glen19
3 days ago
They slow it down because of the pushback but then they ramp it up

@hunter
3 days ago
Labour will introduce a race equality act which will sail through parliament with labours huge majority

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
mhm

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It happened in the past. After the migrant crisis in Europe years ago they slowed it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
impossible to believe it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Interesting video recommended by Keith Woods | How Denmark SOLVED The Immigration Crisis:
https://tinyurl.com/ysratcvb

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
by what? 5 people?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
already signed

@Glen19
3 days ago
There is a pattern of left wing parties reducing immigration after right parties increase it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

14Reasons
3 days ago
lmfao

the woodlander
3 days ago
good for david…

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I like Farage but he’s not our guy

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
mhm

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Its pathological delusional thinking

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
you aren’t one of our guys

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It wasn’t stopped completely but they did slow it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
I don’t believe most of mainstream data

Honkey
3 days ago
because these govts are just theatre for the masses

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
we should put Morgoth in charge.

@IPF89
3 days ago
labour are for open borders so more invaders

@Joesmith
3 days ago
blare was the worst

@why
3 days ago
Farage isnt our guy, but, he’s not motivated by money or blackmail.. He has a vision for the country and he’s single minded and will keep at it.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Check out the left wing party in Denmark and how much they decreased it

withey
3 days ago
biggest channel crossing numbers yesterday

the woodlander
3 days ago
its a corrupt anti white system. dont take part

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Starmer is like a stepford wife

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
k

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, you just outed yourself as a Uketard

@sonof7s
3 days ago
Putin is a Communist OBVIOUSLY!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@14Reasons
I can’t take credit for that point. Just passing on a superchat from Rumble.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I voted SDP at the local elections.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
time after time

the woodlander
3 days ago
sdp are very pro family, which is good.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
If Black Americans were given their own ethnostate I guarantee within 6 months it will fall into utter chaos and Whites will be blamed

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
and entropy doesn’t accept my bank card

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
right with putins multi racial utopia russia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Someone superchat asking for Nativist bars. I’m out of odysee tokens.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
NATIVIST BARS

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Donation on Rumble:
kevinnormansavage
$5
I wonder if Putin might see his way clear to giving or selling us Ethno nationalists a nice chunk of land where we can thrive and be the best neighbour he ever had

Natty
3 days ago
thats good

Natty
3 days ago
lmao

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.01
If Just Stop Oil did a protest at a synagogue they’d have to be renamed Just Stop Moil.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I think they both like eating cut dick

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
They’re both born blaggers.

14Reasons
3 days ago
yea farage with his place being pro invasion as a worthless traitor

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
why are you even here

@why
3 days ago
Honestly, if you think farage doesnt give a shit about the UK youve lost the plot.

@cheflad
3 days ago
its like Diane Abbot ,she could race bait anyone until she had a pop at the Tribe ,then the hammer came down on her.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
200+ years of Black American failure wont magically be cured by bringing down confederate statues

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
so true

danzimmons
3 days ago
$1⃣4⃣*⃣8⃣

@SomaComa
3 days ago
wait who’s selling used cars here?

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
lmfao no

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
hyper consumption. they aren’t designed for it. they’re supposed to be in mud huts.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
If they did it at a synagogue, they’d be called Just Stop Mohel.

@TheAyatollah

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
its obvious that he cares about his country

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Come on lads. Only 6 more likes for the magic 109.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
well said Mark

the woodlander
3 days ago
taking an african and transplanting him in europe increases his consumption of commodities by 80% great for capitalism dire for the environment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’ll only attacks the states enemies

danzimmons
3 days ago
they’ll never attack any synagogue

@hunter
3 days ago
just stop oil are no threat to the state. perfect controlled opposition

@why
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
poor horse

@why
3 days ago
Hed be dumb not to

danzimmons
3 days ago
paid actors

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
DEFO. Tollah. Fetch the noose

@why
3 days ago
Has Farage spoke about it?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Tollah Telegram post regarding violation of Stonehenge:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah/5341

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Just Stop Oil were a state op to bring in increased police powers on protests.

@IPF89
3 days ago
they’re vermin

@cheflad
3 days ago
i Agree wth David Clews ,these groups are being promoted by the media and Establishment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
“bring down White history so brown people can have their turn to power”- pure evil

danzimmons
3 days ago
^

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
uh huh

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the emotions that rule the left are anxiety and greed. while on the right those emotions are pride and disgust. just wait for people to get there.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Sure, for now.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
pretty sure destroying White made statues wont bring West Africa to our level like they think

danzimmons
3 days ago
farrage the mirage

14Reasons
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the dildo that isn’t used for the conventional orifice

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, i mean you know thats not true

Blankeon
3 days ago
Its good. Make it obvious to everyone that America is under Zionist occupation.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
he probably supports it

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@14Reasons
They are the dildo of the state

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
as temporary solution

14Reasons
3 days ago
they are basically the state

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Their logic is bring down White heritage because brown people cant build civilization

@SomaComa
3 days ago
they need to go

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
David is right about starving their oxygen of publicity.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The pussy hats create a lot of C02

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

14Reasons
3 days ago
the government is probably funding these stop oil bastards. because it’s what the establishment wants. destroying european history

danzimmons
3 days ago
all part of war on the west

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s not just a rock

withey
3 days ago
about 5000 years

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

14Reasons
3 days ago
these just stop oil people are terrorists themselves

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Fetch the noose

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea someone would get a slap for doing that

@IPF89
3 days ago
just stop oil should be put in the stocks

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
He means death to the conservatives in Minecraft

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
the goy are restless

14Reasons
3 days ago
I’d physically intervene. don’t care

Stan1
3 days ago
Always always against European culture & art

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Stonehenge has a fence around it.

@hunter
3 days ago
the government already basically agree with just stop oil.

@cheflad
3 days ago
again ,where does the just stop oil funding come from

@Joesmith
3 days ago
press 1 for gas

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN NOW! PA Membership Now Open! Only £3 per month.
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

@Gundobar
3 days ago
Every.Single,Time

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Kline

@SomaComa
3 days ago
(((Surprise!)))

@why
3 days ago
what happened?

@Joesmith
3 days ago
every single time

Honkey
3 days ago
EST

14Reasons
3 days ago
the real terrorists are propped up by the elite. good white men are lied about. the terrorists project and claim we are the terrorists

danzimmons
3 days ago
White people are already creating parallel societies in murrica

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Milkshake isn’t enough

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
REDS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Capitol punishment for destruction of a national monument

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Rope and Pole

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’re vandalizing beautiful things. they must be punished

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’s pre-historic

@why
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yeah. They screwing up all over the place

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
hope so

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
this will be a crazy century with the collapses of the USA, russia, china.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It shows that it isn’t a lack of funding because foreign States gave funding in the past

@why
3 days ago
Ukraine is their plan b

danzimmons
3 days ago
can’t even contain sandal wearing Houthi’s lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
and they can’t trust anyone and they increasing have to rely on Jews and not their usual shabbos

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Reuters | US imposes sanctions on Nordic Resistance Movement in fight against white supremacy:
https://tinyurl.com/msme9drf

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The shitbags have taken control of all pressure points in white countries globally.

danzimmons
3 days ago
wait till Hezbollah is done with israel gonna be was real

@why
3 days ago
the citadel is under attack

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
yes

@why
3 days ago
Theyre stretched

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
it is nice

@why
3 days ago
Natty dead right

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Nationalists in Europe have worked with Arab nationalists in the past prior to 9/11. Hafez Al-Assad & Gaddafi even funded White nationalist organizations.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
i believe that european states will split. and then the reconquest will begin.

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
This is the best colour

@why
3 days ago
how much balls would it take to take ZoG’s money and betray them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’ll be proscribed here next.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the kek colour

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Terrible racist green colour

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Glen19
and what are we doing about the devshirme system, the mediterranean white slave trade, the destruction of the roman empire, etc. they are anti white. wake up.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I always vote as well

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@why
3 days ago
cant barage the farage

Honkey
3 days ago
write in for Hitler

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
yup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The cool thing is that none of us want to be doing this

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
Democracy = Plutocracy

the woodlander
3 days ago
as interesting as these elections are, and it is good to see the public moving slowly our way, im afraid the direction of travel for the UK has already been determined.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
mark it doesn’t matter. look at ancient rome. they decided to go for 2 parties optimates and populares. they were the exact same thing. until augustus came it was all a complete joke.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS totally ruining Mark!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PMSL

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Germans have went to fight with Palestinians and received training. They have streets named after American & European martyrs. What are you on about?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Stan1
3 days ago
I’m likely to pass this time, so agree with David. All the candidates are not for me

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
You are correct, it’s awful to hear them squirm and excuse their traitorous behaviour. I do say to my peers that I care more about their grandchilren than they do, despite being comfortable. I don’t have many friends ha ha. But beware, time isn’t on your side.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
What recourse have you got though when you’re not represented at all?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Democracy is a scam

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anarchism

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being Pro-Palestine should be a Non-sequitur. I have no idea why it is so controversial

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Clews has got the Pooch bug!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I’m sorry to fed post, but…..

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Reform aren’t standing in my area or I’d vote for them

withey
3 days ago
the only choice i have is SDP so i will vote SDP

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
voting is just offering them legitimacy.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
allot of us don’t care for them. I think they shouldn’t be slaughtered by jews but that’s it

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SDP are old-Left. Not bad

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ADayWithoutYesterday
That was a fake accent he put on for years.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I thought Tollah was born and bred London but he’s got a northern accent.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
no we don’t

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
as I’ve said u sir are a particular case. completely opposite to the others in your generation. but they lived under the highest living standards in human history. it made them soft and fat. also numerically the largest generation in history. so all politics is voted by them.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
‘far right’ doesn simp for non whites

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Glen The Chinaman on Gab:
https://gab.com/GlenTheChinaman

Blankeon
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
tragic comedy yes

withey
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
it seems SDP are centre left but are against immigration

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
British democrats

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
and they still hate us. they would rejoice of the same happened to us.

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Jeff Taylor UKIP.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
it is not taking the knee , we hve common enemy

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway or Reform

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Reform.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Reform

Natty
3 days ago
but it has no mass appeal BHP beacuse hes doing it whiles trying to avoid the paradigim of the “far right”

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItsOkToBeANationalist
Thanks for your generous donation.

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
$25.00
If six pointed Starmer + his handlers are smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media – we’ve reduced immagration. Normies will think he is a messiah. Great line up! Great show!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@why
3 days ago
If Farage was anti-zionist, Galloway would possibly team up with Farage in a coalition… not that it will happen.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s all fun until the golem rips their head off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I constantly make this point on X. The ‘woke’ are supporting the capitalist elite.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
money power loves mass migration

14Reasons
3 days ago
the left is severely disturbed

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Obviously I hope you are right, but the youngsters I talk to (outside of our sphere) are low energy zombies

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
Anytime.

danzimmons
3 days ago
millions of jewish golem’s

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Cheers friend!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway is quite good on immigration, FFS, NAtty

@SomaComa
3 days ago
immigration is a golem

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
greetings

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Hey bud!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes

@why
3 days ago
they will never vote tory or labour while they have farage

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
hello brother.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SCAB LABOUR

@why
3 days ago
red wall is going Reform

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Need leadership with courage

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Homa Tawk on Telegram:
https://t.me/Bunch_a_hunks

withey
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
if i cn watch it i will

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
We ruined two.of Galloways meetings in South Wales back in the day. He had to be taken out the back door

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
revolutionary politics

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
it is funny to us as well. seeing your grandparents care more about their pensions that the ethnic make up of the country their grandchildren will live in…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
He seem like a old school leftie (tankie)

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago
Gentlemen

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea that’s distasteful

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Had a lot on with work recently, but I didn’t want to miss this one.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
You can be right on all those things without cosying up to Muslims.

danzimmons
3 days ago
like i said, kommie bastards

withey
3 days ago
we need galloway to split the vote of left and muslim, but i hate galloway

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Polite and hate conflict ha ha

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I like Galloway, but he was wrong about south Africa

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Ay up, Mark,. Long time no see

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
o/

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Im on a stream with the Irish at 9pm on twitter
https://x.com/OffgridIreland/status/1803191281000014320?t=_AGon72qSeyhaUu2pPSqBg&s=19

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Tenner say Galloway wins Dale, We on?

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
u are a particular case. the boomers are the 1st generation in history that decided to live better than their children. u are all very polite and hate conflict. our generations need struggle to flourish.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Evening young man. Hope you’re well.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@why
3 days ago
Som jew attacjked him

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett video | Galloway Winning is a Blow for the System:
https://tinyurl.com/2tjs6ktu

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
probably

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
$10.00
Excellent show tonight, gents.

@why
3 days ago
Galloway and Farage in UK Parl would be epic

Mark Collett
3 days ago
I think the Muslims will go back to Labour, the rest to Reform, he will be squeezed out.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$1.00
My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UKIP conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied ‘Rand Paul’. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and he must have made a fair amount of money on that advice !

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Galloway hates us

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Coming to something when me and Mark (NatSocs) support Galloway for him bloodying the nose of the System

@why
3 days ago
I think he will lose his seat also

@why
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
he released his manifesto today and he seemed really depressed. He was canvassing in Rochdale last night and tweeted that over 50% of people they spoke to would vote Reform..

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Nope, you won’t. We boomers thought we’d change things. You will soon run out of time and be the target of younger people. We need to work together, not look for scapegoats

danzimmons
3 days ago
intil they’re starving

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Zoomer Historian | Do British Veterans Regret Fighting World War 2?
https://tinyurl.com/bdzsdndt

Blankeon
3 days ago
How many times will the normies accept being tricked until they have had enough. That is the real question.

the woodlander
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
its a sad indictment on our leaders.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
Zoomer historian did a great video on that

@noreplacement
3 days ago
I’ve heard from people who have met Farage over the years, that he is more base than his TV persona

danzimmons
3 days ago
^^

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
once the boomers are gone… then u will see an explosion of nationalism like u won’t believe.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Some very good takes, it’s a great panel.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The “White Silence is violence” mantra is absurd. So being a passive uninvolved White person apparently is violent

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Read the Unknown Warriors by Nicholas Pringle its full of people who fought in WW2 who say it wasnt worth it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
This should be an extra long show

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
^^^^

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
You’re on good form mate. :clapping_hands:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Clews is correct.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Yeah, that’s what they said once the anaesthetic wore off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Ouch! :rofl:

danzimmons
3 days ago
Derrick Day has taste in transportation

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Candace Owens had a interesting take on WW2 recently

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tollah’s getting cutt off more than a tranny

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
lol, that is very possitive

@noreplacement
3 days ago
Powell was of his time remember. Things were not as bad back then

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Robinson is too busy chasing leaves and sucking jew dick to be of any use.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow No Chance:
https://linktr.ee/NaeChance

withey
3 days ago
hail

@WelshNationalistJoe

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Joe Marsh (Welsh Nationalist):
Odysee:

@WelshNationalistJoe
Telegram:
https://t.me/realwelshnationalist
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/@WelshNationalistJoe

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
typical conservative. he was not revolutionary in his ideas. look at the german ’30s pre-meme drawings. they all came true.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘Rhetorical concessions’… Well said.

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Powell was the Farage of his day

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Even leftists are redeemable if they have a +100 i.Q

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
normies literally don’t matter in political terms. they are the biggest eunuchs in political history. the most radical group always wins. so don’t go for quantity. quality is the most important.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Red zionist vs blue zionist. Pick your poison.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We punch way way way above our weight

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
shame

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Powell was a loser

danzimmons
3 days ago
kommie priq

@SomaComa
3 days ago
A normy is a potential fren

danzimmons
3 days ago
i helped the jew destroy White South Africa ~ G Gallaway

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
GALLOWAY is ant-ZOG

@why
3 days ago
I think nationalists are over thinking the Farage thing. He’s just promising the earth for the sake of votes. He’s giving a taster of what people want.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
I agree

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It is happening. You can look in your street and see it.

danzimmons
3 days ago
i saw a comment on George Bagby’s Tgram about Mark, how i knew he was streaming

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It’s a postitve sign, but don’t trust Farage obviously.

withey
3 days ago
we must demand non-white deportations regardless of criminal or how long they’ve lived here

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
once the living standard really starts going down, just wait for them to actually turn to real nationalists. now they are living without struggle.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander’s website, The Woodlander Initiative:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Good point, MARK

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Das macht es für uns einfacher, andere zu erreichen.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Remigration

the woodlander
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
i know.. good stuff

@SomaComa
3 days ago
We exist in a ‘first past the post system’

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Sargon was the first to move and perhaps he dragged Farage along. Farage can’t ignore the younger commentators.

withey
3 days ago
??

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
yeah the cucking with HnH is too much, was that just under tice

@noreplacement
3 days ago
you don’t have to get elected to influence politics

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Galloway is suing HnH

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s true, it helps us

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Barry Stanton 4 PM.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@withey
I have heard similar double standards

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

the woodlander
3 days ago
not sure i can advocate voting for a party that uses HnH as a vetting agent.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
agreed

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
indeed. but they are playing a dangerous game, because the people will be extremely mad that they didn’t deliver.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
i know a homeowner who backs 100% the farmer who killed the gypsy burgler yet can’t back kyle rittenhouse all because of the media

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Farage should never become PM, but he could be useful in destroying the Tories

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
David has a good take on Farage’s role.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I despise the Royal Family, honestly.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
All of the bollocks and words and no action

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
exactly.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get Clews on GALLOWAY

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it always feels like ‘pressure valve’

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Trump must loose

Blankeon
3 days ago
Pseudo-Nationalism

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Clews gets it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Most of the Jewish billionaires support Trump

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
the older generations.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
the people follow the media

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
pothole nationalism, simple as

withey
3 days ago
farage must rule before he can be dismissed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
certainly

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
of course he talked like a puppet. if he was an actual nationalist he would go on the attack. never allow them to dictate the course of the discussion.

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I know. And they live in Switzerland.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
more experienced, then

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Bjorn Hocke would be a much better leader of the AfD.

withey
3 days ago
for reform to go it must first fail

withey
3 days ago
farage hasn’t got to power yet

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Mordaunt is in her 50s.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Farage is just like Meloni and Trump. They sound good, but they dont deliver on anything and they are Zionists.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
so msm vultures are baying for blood, you must appear as a fellow vulture not a carcass

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
:hundred_points:

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
a lot of truth there

LoveLoad
3 days ago
the system is designed to give you hope and screw you in the end

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
what is good with this whole situation is that farage was pushed into talking about our talking points. and of course he is the zionists property.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Ironically lefties think they are against the system but they are actually fighting for the regime and dont even realize it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
agreed

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Brexit in name only

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Germans supported the great one because he was undeniably correct.

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
true he’s no patriot but he just might be racist

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
14

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
The AfD voted against a petition calling for an end to arms exports to Israel. They are probably just a controlled bunch too. Too bad there are a few good ones in the party. But the top is conformist.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Horse Consoler
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
he wasn’t a banker, common misconception

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for more revolutionary shows like this

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
u actually answered that with a question?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@withey
hes a man of the system, exbanker, he may have some right wing ideas, but ultimately he will buckle to what is best for the system itself

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially a middle-class phenomenon

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
No agreement yet exists among social scientists as to sources of naziism’s sudden electoral surge in 1930 and 1932. One widely held view, stressing the importance of the “outcast and apathetic,” has been sharply challenged by S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
what would you say to msm?

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@withey
Farage feels more legit than most, even though he’s political and shits on people.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
farage who said that his greatest political achievement was stopping actual nationalists? does that sound legit to u??

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Im getting off track. I just thought that is some scary stuff

withey
3 days ago
they say farage is further fight than what we think he is

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed

withey
3 days ago
i believe farage is legit

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Farage is constrained, but like Trump, it’s better than the leftist rocket ride to doom.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The lack of privacy is extremely concerning

withey
3 days ago
can’t believe the banana milkshake, they say different woman, they say she’s a labourite

@cheflad
3 days ago
looks like hes on course to win Clacton by some margin,so he’ll be in the HOC.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
farage is the very definition of controlled opposition. without revolution their manifesto cannot be implemented. he will tell u what u want to hear and they will do nothing at all.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Through genetic genealogy

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I read that every single White American can now be identified through DNA. One could sip a coffee and the feds get it and can know extremely personal information now

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
everything isn’t 8D chess mate

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
Mordaunt has a good rack

LadyOfMercia
3 days ago
it was a diff girl

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
it wasn’t the same girl

@MarkCollett

Blankeon
3 days ago
Equity is just rebranded Communism

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
indeed in name only. it was financed by actual german elite and former nobility.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
NEW: Mark Collett video | Farage’s Plan to KILL the Conservative Party:
https://tinyurl.com/bdzxu79e

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I was looking to buy property in Virginia and the taxes are just insane. Cant I just live in peace without the system constantly trying to control me

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the more tyrannical they become, the closer that system is to complete collapse.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The problem in Britain is the elites have played the classes off against each other for generations.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have gone mad with power and the people must push back

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
You might think that they think the state is God and its politicians are the angels.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
in Germany the disaffected middle class a very important role

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
I have to disagree with that. revolution is always fought between two elite groups. workers, farmers, peasants are simply drafted against their will. except for a couple of cases in china there are no workers revolutions.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
No offence taken

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The talk is for proletariat equality, meanwhile the fatcats eat in a way that makes capitalists blush.

@Joesmith
3 days ago
gust got ere 14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Eddy
Thanks for your support.

@Eddy
3 days ago
$16.00
Thanks for the stream great lineup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Blair is a Fabian society socialist

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
agreed

Stan1
3 days ago
‘Activate the Farage’!!!!

Blankeon
3 days ago
Blaming Islam does not really solve anything though since Islam is not the problem. The problem is non-Whites in general.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Activate protocol Farage!

@cheflad
3 days ago
the man who bragged about taking down the BNP.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
It was called the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party for a reason, buddy

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
My opinion is that parents that send their children to private schools should receive a tax rebate equvalent to the cost of public school education.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Revolution always comes from the WORKERS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
this will upset the Boomers

@SomaComa
3 days ago
With fatcat Oligarchs that creep in

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Government always wants their cut of our hardworking money

withey
3 days ago
homeschool

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s pure (((Communism)))

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Remove your kids from school

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$14.00
very intersting

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
im speaking in terms of the military

withey
3 days ago
a prison cell for a few good years or killed within 30 mins of being on the battlefield

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Me and Natty are ex-military: NO WAY will we fight again

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
How the heck could we ever respect a government that’s actively working on erasing us. Patriotism is dead

@cheflad
3 days ago
but surely they know the ultimate outcome is mutual destruction..

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
But you need a tory style party for that , labour can’t do that

@SomaComa
3 days ago
WW3 3rd time lucky

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
damn

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Da,n, this is SPICY!

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
Enjoy the next month or two before the next dancing Jew boogaloo

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
False flag will probably happen towards the end of Summer right as people are heading back to school and work

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
No White American should ever even consider fighting for a country that has shown no loyalty whatsoever to them

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Iran DID NOT lock up Sam

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That’s why we need to question EVERY attack.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
They’re more than happy to drive our countries into oblivion for profit and Israel.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
a shooting wouldn’t be enough

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Jet fuel can’t melt through passports.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Look at this utter mess we are left with

@PaganBear
3 days ago
They want to kill off white in a war and leave our kids/women with the brown people.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have the audacity to call multiracial society a strength. It’s clear increasingly everyday that the exact opposite is the truth.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE point, Tollah

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Stan1
3 days ago
57

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
If the reform party can destroy the tories , I think it is a good outcome for this election

The Awakened Saxon
3 days ago
‘James Baker, former US Secretary of State ‘We painted Hitler as a monster. The devil incarnate. Thus, we were forced after the war, to play along with this devil’s scenario. We could not possibly have explained to the people that the war was only an economic preventative measure.’

@PaganBear
3 days ago
If we are stupid enough to fight for them we deserve to die as a race.

pa
3 days ago
i aint fighting for starmer of sunak

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
We’re the Fash Street Kids

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
they can’t fight wars anymore.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Special Needs Platoon.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Bash street kids, lol

@IPF89
3 days ago
fat cnuts

Stan1
3 days ago
LOL

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I think the days of the regime are numbered

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE revolutionary Nationalist politics

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
White men back in British Army ads…..must be time for another ziowar

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Anyone who argues otherwise is either in denial or flat out unintelligent

@cheflad
3 days ago
Le Pen said yesterday that long range missiles shouldn’t be provided to Ukraine.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@Charles
Indeed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Labour is not a war party

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Ace point, Clews

withey
3 days ago
no marching it’ll be ‘enemy at the gates’ scenario

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Multiracial society for the most part leads to massive suffering

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
let alone a forced march in full military gear.

@cheflad
3 days ago
only one difference these days ,Russia have got Hypersonic missiles.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
so true

withey
3 days ago
also the london riots type won’t leave the inner city estates

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Diversity and Unity are literal opposites. Pick one.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
toolmakers are the backbone of heavy industry

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Axis of evil is a term Bush coined.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
National + Socialism = ideal

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
It’s going to be a wild ride, that’s for sure.

withey
3 days ago
can’t be unified with muslims

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Fair point. Galloway’s 10-points is also revolutionary

@cheflad
3 days ago
as Sam Fender sang ,”high time for Hypersonic missiles ”

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Some of my ancestors were toolmakers in Sheffield using the best steel in the world at the time.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
When Nativist tries to chat up Tory birds. “Scuse me love, give me one night and in 9 months and I’ll have you in Labour.”

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Net Zero Immigration. 10,000 engineers leave, 10,000 illiterate unskilled Afghans arrive.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Is it’s conscription, RIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the woodlander
3 days ago
reforms manifesto is pretty good, but nearly none of it wiould be possible to implement without a revolution, its just telling you what you want to hear, with no intention of doing it.

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Reform Manifesto read like Twitter right wing talking points.

withey
3 days ago
no one matched blair, but now it’s a whole different world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE CHAT. Revolutionary politics

@cheflad
3 days ago
things can only get apocalyptic.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Toolmaker is an honorable profession

withey
3 days ago
blair was young, strong and a gogetter

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
He made one specifically big tool…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Typical middle-class cnt

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Labour’s placards around my way have the Union Jack on them.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Good to you as well

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
It’s all words from Starmer

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Good evening brother.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Hello Folks

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
or Fool Brittania?

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Faux Gatekeepers, Shills and Controlled opposition like Farage are going to fill the Void ,just when we need a Grassroots funded Right-wing party.

Stan1
3 days ago
Starmer looks like a rabbit caught in the headlights of a juggernaut.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
agreed! That is what a friend of mine says

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
as in france, once u fail to pass a budget a revolution will follow.

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Labour are quite capable of tearing themselves apart once the honeymoon period is over.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I agree with Tollah’s take.

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I might struggle to get it in. Unlike with actual dots.

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Labour Party arent even going to abolish the Bedroom Tax ,which 75% are disabled who pay that punitive Tax.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
see, do as I say, happiness follows!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Back on my feet, mate. Even working 6-9pm. Happy now

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Purchase Grandma Towler’s tea, coffee, and honey:
https://www.grandmatowlers.co.uk/shop/
NEW: The official Free Sam Melia Mug:

Free Sam Melia Mug

withey
3 days ago
green green green propaganda, muslim independents, lib dem clowning, non-white led tories, labour no passion no drive reform is energetic ……..it’s all up in the air

Natty
3 days ago
its hard to say who is worse

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
You laughed when I said that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway says Labour are worse than Tory

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tay-sob

withey
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for WOODY

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
evening

withey
3 days ago
do we think the greens will take from liblabcon?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
hi rory

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good evening

@Woodlader.4
my friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander:
Website:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/
Telegram:
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/367pzrj4
Odysee:

@Woodlader.4

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Evening

@The
woodlander

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Woodlader.4

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Galloway will win. A tenner says so.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Better Based Than Erased
3 days ago
Yes that was a disgrace.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Stan1
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@cheflad
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
GROUNS

Stan1
3 days ago
$14.00
Great show & guests. As my Grandad once said. ‘Embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline’.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@cheflad
3 days ago
1 Little Indian

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
14

the woodlander
3 days ago
gents

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Apparently Farage is the most handsome political candidate according to a recent poll !

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It sickens me how the public will go back to voting labour despite both parties crapping on us for decades.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
how long before you tell your “connect the dots” joke?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
One Reform say “Blood and Soil! I will vote for them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Steve Laws missed a shot by not campaigning under the slogan “Laying down the Law”

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews welcomed onto these shows

Stan1
3 days ago
Pretty sure Boris said something similar in 2019

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
More dots than a pallet of dice.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The Sunak family has more dots than a website url.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Labour will not have an easy ride. Clews is right

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak is trying to curry f(l)avour with the Israel lobby. It’s a sari state of affairs.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Scots won’t vote for a brown man

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
A hung Parliament is our best bet. Let’s tie the System up in knots. Fk it. Disorder is now our friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
San(skrit) Diego.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak wants to skip off to the states with his family.

Stan1
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
you won, here’s your shekel – lol

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow British Gammon:
Odysee:

@BritishGammon
Gab:
https://gab.com/BritishGammon

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
I predict a victory for ZOG

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
ha ha David!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Victory for the “Friends of Israel” lobbies.

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
awwwwr nawwwwwr

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha, well played David.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
LULZ

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Go ‘ead lad.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Soz, mate, Busy. 2 jobs now. Hope that cheers you up.

@MarkCollett

withey
3 days ago
vote reform vote SDP

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
650

@why
3 days ago
reform 40+ seats

withey
3 days ago
fear of labour, fear of the tories, both as bad as each other

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
sent weeks ago

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I would advise everyone to vote Reform purely to help break up the Tories.

withey
3 days ago
hail

@TheAyatollah

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
The card? I’ve been busy. 2 jobs now. I’ll let you know

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@why
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
saw that about Dowson

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Chief_Moody

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Wonder what Nick Griffin will think of Galloway suing HNH, given that he supports Galloway, and his employer Jim Dowson works for HNH.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Heil

@TheAyatollah

withey
3 days ago
SDP is in a pact with reform, i’ll vote SDP

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Evening all.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Evening troops

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
YOU HAVE BEEN SENT IT, did it arrive?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp

@RoryHerbert
Thanks for your ongoing support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Clews is munching

@why
3 days ago
galloway might lose his seat, he said rochdale was 50% reform

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway tuns on Hope not State!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stan1
3 days ago
We are approaching some fun times I think – 14’s for all Nationalists.

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
Zero Seats?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
$14.88
Great line up!

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$5.00
Just a thought

@MarkCollett
. I would appreciate your comments on ‘Just Stop Oil’s spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I have a lot of respect for the woman who intervened. What is the panel’s opinion?

@noreplacement
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.05
Don’t forget, Tollah is also a rapper.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
This line up has the makings of a great cabinet when we win the election

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews. He’s come a long way

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Let’s goooooo hello lads

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
get MARRIED!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Don’t forget a rapper

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
o/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
np

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Thanks for the info.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
Email Mark Collett: mark@thefallofwesternman.com

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Serious A-Team. Clews is a top boy

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
To donate to Mark Collett via Bitcoin Lightning (click DONATE):
https://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

withey
3 days ago
good evening all, 14/88 28

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Oh man, that’s awful.

Stan1
3 days ago
David, Tollah, Mark, Natty – ‘the A Team’

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
This stream is also available on:
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/3p8t6k5m
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

Speak your mind
3 days ago
14

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
88

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Stan1
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Azzmador. So long, mate. Sad news.

The Krypto Report’s Azzmador Has Passed Away at 57

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@BaritoneHarmonica
Hello CB, thank you :grinning:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@Stan1
Hello Stan!

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

Stan1
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
Anytime.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Oh hello

@SerenaJB
I’m a big fan

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Thanks Reed! :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Hello

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Sheeeeeeeiiiiiiiittt

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Good evening.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
What up

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Next pabtomime is the election. HAIL GALLOWAY!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Lulz

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I haven’t seen any of the sportsball… Have the Germans been singing Auslander Raus?

Natty
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
hahahahaha true that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get what?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anyone watching the Euro pantomime with Africa (France)? Romainai beat Ukraine 3-0 so they will get U.S. sanctions

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
did you get it?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
This is just going to be Tollah on his own impersonating the rest of them.

@SouthernAsshole
3 days ago
LFG.. failed mobile gamer vibes..

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Hopefullly some Nativist Bars during the interval.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tasty chat tonight. Tollah’s my bro. I know his views

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Reed

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Super-mod Redd

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Thanks for your dedicated support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

Merry_Englander
3 days ago
$5.00
Greetings all.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tremendous line-up. Clews has come a long way. Top boy. Hopefully we will have some revolutionary Nationalist chat instead of the usual bitching about news of the day. Stop piss-arsing about with elections and the old failed ways. Move on.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@dsallen7
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II has a single 30-milimetre Gatling cannon, and two General Electric turbines. When it fires its gun and puts its engines to full, it will actually accelerate backwards. That is how powerful it is.

@dsallen7
3 days ago
$10.00
Conservatives Delenda Est!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Thanks for your consistent and ongoing support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@JLPhillips
Thanks for your contribution.

JakesChannel
3 days ago
$5.00
What a fantastic line up, cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show Mark.

Honkey
3 days ago
i like the thumbs down button too, then we can see how many nosebergs showed up

Open Borders for Israel
3 days ago
$5.00
did you see the US government designated the Nordic Resistance Movement as a terrorist group?

@chris
3 days ago
Why is there no thunbs down buttom any more. hum…

Honkey
4 days ago
Great Lineup :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
0

==========================

See Also

top