Thomas Sewell: Alrighty, we’re live. Max volume, everything. Audio input, capture.

 

All right, testing, 1, 2, 3. Use my big boy voice. Volume’s low. What’s your problem? I actually found a setting. Everyone’s like, Tom, fix your settings. We’re going 150%. There we go. Alrighty. Alrighty. Testing, testing!

 

All right, obligatory, free Joel Davis! Free Brandon [Koschel]! Free Jim Roberts!

 

So I’m going to cover a few subjects today, as you expect, with a solo stream. I really enjoyed my most recent stream with James Mason. It was like a five hour don’t Fed post challenge hard. He Fed posted a couple times, but as you’d expect. But I reviewed it and it wouldn’t breach. It wouldn’t breach even the most ridiculous laws we have here in Australia.

 

Now, one thing that I need to correct from the stream is I think I said that the book Siege is in a grey area of the law. My lawyer has told me that it is potentially banned. So he was like, it’s kind of in a dark grey area of the law. It’s not 100% banned. There is a banned list of books in Australia and Siege isn’t on it. But I cannot encourage anyone to go and buy that book because they haven’t made the case yet.

 

But what he suggests is that they’re trying to make the case. So I’d be very careful with that book in Australia. That’s one thing I want to clarify. Yeah, I think Mason gave a pretty sound explanation of what his intention of the book is. And I’m surprised that there hasn’t been any negative press because I know the journalists will watch a stream like that and get their AI ready to write an article for them about how evil we all are. But, yeah, that hasn’t happened.

 

But I do want to give people caution here in Australia that, yeah, I’m not encouraging you on legal grounds. I’m not encouraging you to read the book.

 

And I think all I said in the stream was that I did read it back in 2019 after being bullied by Jacob Hersant into reading it. I originally didn’t read it because I thought it was what everyone says it is. And I was like:

 

“I’m not really interested in that. I know enough about X, Y and Z through reading army manuals when I was in the army, so I don’t feel the need to read something of that nature.”

 

And then Jacob was like:

 

“No, it’s. That’s not what it’s about at all! There’s like some contentious lines in it. But overall, that’s not what it says.”

 

And Mason clarified that on stream. And I do appreciate him doing that because I think siege culture and accelerationist culture is really misunderstood. You know, accelerationism as a concept is, and siege as a concept is really misunderstood. And you’ll notice when I said to Mason about how our strategy has been to do the maximal amount of work with the minimal amount of damage, you’ll notice he was nodding the most. Mason’s not advocating for anyone to be an idiot and go to jail. He’s actually advocating the opposite. He’s saying:

 

“Do as much as you can to the integrity of the system without ruining your life!”

 

And he is proof that he’s done 60 years in the struggle. 60 years of inspiring people to be like:

 

“Well, hang on a minute, this system is evil and corrupt and contributing to it and trying to seek entry into it in hopes to change it is not an effective strategy.”

 

And he’s always been an advocate of the opposite. To siege it, to besiege it, to starve it. And yeah there’s no point, you know, running at it, doing a hero run, you know, charging at the castle walls, you’re just going to get pinged by some dude with an arrow. You’ve got to just wait it out, you’ve got to siege it, not wait it out and do nothing. But there’s a lot of things you can do while besieging an enemy.

 

And so people have to think creatively about what that means. And not but again, all politics, all politics, when it is in its infancy, attracts radical people. And radical people are more prone to self destructive behaviour. And so you want to have people that are courageous, you want to have courageous men, you want to have courageous leaders. And courageous does not mean foolish!

 

And so you do have to balance the concepts of bravery and courage with patience. And there’s a lot of virtue, a lot of virtue in having the strength to put yourself against a system that’s destroying you without becoming a martyr, you know, without letting the system destroy you. Now if you step over that line and the system puts you in jail for life or you get assassinated, like George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

I mean, Matt Hale, for example, who was involved, my understanding, with the creativity movement, he wasn’t the founder, but he was like the young hotshot that was rising up. And I think he’s in jail for life. I think he gets out of jail in about 10 years time from now. And he’s been in jail for like 20 years. Guys like Matt Howell, for example, just got really unlucky. They got. He got really unlucky and he got caught up in something that he hadn’t. I’ve looked at the case, I’ve looked at the case, the facts of the case, and the guy hasn’t done anything wrong. They could just. He was just a serious threat to the system and something like that could happen to me. But God willing, I’m safe from that level of corruption!

 

[07:42]

 

And I think it might be good luck, it might just be good luck! It might be destiny. But you don’t, what is it? You don’t count your chickens until they come home to roost or something? It’s still early days. It’s very early days. I’m still a young man. I might be bald, but I’m young and fit.

 

So, yeah, it’s, I’m 33 years old this year as of this month. And yeah, there’s a lot of struggle to go.

 

Just open with that if you haven’t checked it out, don’t be intimidated by the fact that it’s five hours. It is broken down into separate conversations. There’s an hour and then there’s a break and then there was meant to be an another hour and a break. But it, the first hour, the first two hours is very consumable for most people.

 

And then obviously, if you’re really into this stuff and you go for long drives and, or you work a job where you can have a, your headphones in a lot of tradies and stuff. Tell me that they like the five hour streams. Don’t be intimidated by having these really long streams. They appreciate, they appreciate the dialogue.

 

So as long as not too often. I don’t think you should listen to streams every day and I don’t think you should listen to music every day. I have been doing a fair bit of community service. I got to do knitting, as you’re all aware, and I advise people not to, I listen to music sometimes the whole time, or a podcast or an audio book. Books are probably the best thing. Books are better than streams because books, streams and dialogue and conversations aren’t as sharp. There’s no way I can communicate with you as clearly and as sharply as, say, reading Mein Kampf on audiobook. It’s not possible because of all the jargon. Those are the clearest thoughts possible. And then they go through an editing process.

 

So where are we? So already in the chat. Already in the chat! They’re arguing about Christianity already. Instantly! It’s incredible! Christianity will come up in this stream. When we talk about Manosphere, we’re going to cover feminism in general. We’re going to talk about all this girl bossing that’s going on at the moment with the Evangelicals. And there’s some heinous stuff that I’ve seen on Twitter where these little soy boy freaks are marrying these goblina jewesses with like 100 body counts. And they’re just saying:

 

“But she’s saved by Christ!”

 

And so it will come up. The conversation will come up. When we’re talking about that. There is definitely part one of this stream. What I’m going to open with is I’ll just. People still saying the volume’s low. Let me just unmute myself. Hold on. Now we’re. I could put up 175. I’ll just go 200. I’ll go 200. Okay. People still complaining. 200%. 200% Audio input, capture, volume. And the mic is like an inch from my face, maybe two. Two inches. Audio input, capture. I’ll put this one at 150. Alrighty. How does that sound? Testing for the last time. Testing. Yeah, fair enough. It is pretty quiet. Yeah, there’s a lot of retards in the chat today. Classic. Everyone’s spurging out. Yeah, that does sound better.

 

All right, sweet. Everyone’s arguing over which strain of Christianity. It’s incredible! It’s incredible! It’s endless. It’s endless, isn’t it? It never ends. It never ends.

 

So to start with the Aboriginal question. So obviously we are still what I am, and I have friends and we are trying to get a political party on the table here in Australia. And so covering the Aboriginal question, and you could call it the woman question, is really important. And it has to be done in a way that’s legal because of these laws here in Australia. And it has to be done in a way that people can understand the values and the rhetoric without getting caught up in the emotional arguments. So one has to be cautious when they approach these two topics. So you might find my speech slightly more refined than normal.

 

Hitler won the female vote in Germany. He actually had more women vote for him than men. And that’s a really interesting phenomenon to consider that more women voted for Hitler than men.

 

And so it shows that women don’t have to necessarily like you in order to respect you and I think that’s an important dynamic. A lot of people have commented, including Mason, about how journalists have behaved, female journalists specifically have behaved when interviewing me. And I saw someone online describe it as “negative tingles”, that they’re not used to someone outside the court giving them negative tingles. Normally it’s boring. Normally their job is boring. And then to have someone that’s got an intense character and an intense personality, it hits the dopamine receptors differently. And I’ve seen grandmas on Facebook comment sections in replies to these interviews saying, “hail Australia”. And all the criticism and all the advice people try to give us over the years is all wrong. It’s all backwards. It’s actually all the other way around. The female question is the opposite of the current orthodoxy, the current belief system of how women should be treated and how politics affects women. It’s all wrong. It’s all an inversion of the truth!

 

The truth is that it comes down to respect! And they respect integrity, not niceties! They don’t respect niceties, they respect integrity. And they respect aggression as long as it’s a as long as it’s not a foolish, foaming at the mouth, barbaric aggression. They don’t have much respect for that, but they almost respect that more and get better tingles from that than Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese. These characters provide no stimulation to the female political psyche. And so understanding how to win the woman vote, you’re not going to win it with outright misogyny. That’s obviously ridiculous! This idea of just be a prick and you’ll get voted in. That’s not what I’m articulating.

 

[16:04]

 

What I’m saying is that people should not continue to spread the lie and demoralisation within our broader scene, our broader movement and political parties in the West, that the way to win the woman vote is to pander to them. That’s really what this comes down to, is the pandering.

 

So that’s a subject on its own that I’ll cover. So that’s what you got to look forward to.

 

But first we’re going to talk about the Aboriginal question and specific. We’ve talked about both these questions a lot, but the reason why it’s come up again is I’ve had a lot of people in person and online message me saying:

 

“Why is our strategy to go to war with Aboriginals? Won’t we win more votes and won’t we do better in Parliament and won’t our message be more well received if we don’t go to war?”

 

These are their words, not mine, with Aboriginals. And my position is not that we’re going to war with Aboriginals.

 

And obviously the Camp Sovereignty situation has played a part in this dialogue because people think that the reason why there’s allegedly an incident on that hill was because of the Aboriginal question. And it’s completely it’s not irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant, but people are conflating and the media has done this. The media has purposefully misled people and made a significant portion of people that support us question their support on the basis of:

 

“Well, why would they attack innocent elderly Aboriginal women?”

 

And most people can see through it. But there is a portion of our supporters that are like:

 

“Oh, I don’t think that was a good move. You probably shouldn’t have attacked innocent elderly Aboriginal women.”

 

And it’s, well, one, that didn’t happen and two, the conflict., … And this is the position that interestingly, a lot of Aboriginals actually share, not all, but a lot, is that the issue is these White traitors.

 

And so if these White traitors didn’t behave the way they did, there wouldn’t be as much conflict between the Whites and the Aboriginals. And you’ll find there’s a lot of, probably a higher percentage of Aboriginal DNA Aboriginals that aren’t supportive of multiculturalism. And there is, the Left call it like an Uncle Tom syndrome, obviously. But my position has always been towards all races that it’s about respect. And it’s a zero sum game a lot of the time regarding resources and living space. That’s zero sum.

 

And so there’s going to have to be compromise or there’s going to be if there’s not some sort of what I’ve always said about the question of re-migration is people bring up the Aboriginals, whenever you talk about re-migration they say:

 

“Oh, but what about the Aboriginals? They were here before you!”

 

So because of that, they’re in their own select category. And what I’ve been trying to explain to people online is that Aboriginals have a choice. And this is the sound bite and this is what you should be saying to if I know a lot of people have an Aboriginal friend, or a part Aboriginal friend, this is what you say to them:

 

“Our position is that you either have part sovereignty over the whole or over full sovereignty over the part. But you can’t have both.”

 

I’ll explain that again. The Aboriginal people can either have part sovereignty over all, or full sovereignty over part. They can’t have both! That’s not a compromise. That’s White genocide. So White people, Anglo, Celtic people predominantly have come to this continent because the continent wasn’t a country, or a nation, it was a continent. It’s a land mass. It’s an island, a big island.

 

But we’ve come to this place. There’s a whole bunch of warring Aboriginal tribes. Some are in cahoots and some aren’t in cahoots. Some have been here 10,000 years. Some have potentially been here 40,000 years. The numbers keep changing. But either way, we came here and we built something separate to them. We tried to include them. There’s a lot of interesting history from the first and Second Fleet and from Arthur and Bligh, Philip. There’s some interesting history where they’ve tried to integrate the Aboriginals and it’s almost always backfired horribly on both the Whites and on the Aboriginals.

 

And so when you look at and Auspill’s done a very good job at covering this, when there has been massacres of Aboriginals, so-called these genocides or massacres, it’s always come down to establishing the Anglo Saxon law on the land. It’s come down to:

 

“Hey, we want this land, we want this territory. We’re bigger and stronger than you. We’re not going to come after you, we’re not going to attack you. But we want this much space. And, it’s living space for Whites. Europe has to breathe out. We’re overcrowded in the streets of London. We’ve got this problem with criminals or petty criminality, people stealing Spoons and stuff. We’re running out of space. We found this place. We’re in a geopolitical issue with all these other people. We can’t explain this to you. We just need what we, what we need. And we’re prepared to fight for it! And your options are to fight us or to just keep moving deeper and deeper into the bush and away from this spot. It’s ours now. You’re not having it back.”

 

[22:11]

 

And obviously anyone in their right mind would be pissed off by that. If some alien force came, you know, from space and did that to us right now and we had really little ability to fight back because they were so technologically advanced, we would rightfully be pissed off, wouldn’t we? But we would have to retreat into the bush, we would have to White flight. We would have to be like, this is too much. We have to consolidate what we’re doing.

 

And so this is beyond Good and Evil. This is a, this is Nietzschean in this concept. The Left try to put a moral framework on that and say:

 

“That’s wrong, that’s evil. And therefore we have to surrender Australia to everyone! We have to be cucks, we have to bend over and we have to let anyone come here and rape us because of this founding moment!”

 

Because White people equals bad as their moral framework. That is their entire moral framework. White people equals bad. And they’ve got this original sin concept:

 

“We’re bad people! We’re horrible people! We’re horrible, bad people!”

 

Now, obviously straight White men don’t think this way. The only people that think this way are people with slave morality, which is homosexuals, freaks, a lot of women unfortunately think this way:

 

“Oh, no, we’re horrible! What we’ve done is so horrible!”

 

You know, this kind of bleeding heart. Not all women, but it is a naturally, it is a feminine energy to put your empathy for others. Well, it’s not even a, it’s a distortion of feminine energy really.

 

But look, it appeals, it appeals to weak willed people. Masculine men don’t think like this. Testosterone doesn’t allow your brain to even go there. We’ve got a completely different philosophical structure, a completely different reality because we’ve got a solar morality. It really comes down to these simple principles. It’s not about good and evil, it’s about solar morality. It’s about, we are a life form, we must exist, we must continue to exist. We don’t have to be pricks about it, we don’t have to be cunts about it. But we’re not going to back down, we’re not going to surrender, we’re not going to roll over and die. And so how do we make this work?

 

And so obviously, while we’re in a nice friendly talking phase about it, I don’t have an issue with Aboriginal sovereignty. It’s not my issue. I don’t. Good on them, Good for them. That’s my position on the Aboriginals. Good for them! If they can have it, good on them.

 

But it’s got nothing to do with me. I’m not paying for it, I’m not engaged in it, I’m not involved in it. It’s not in my face, it’s not in my place, it’s not in my space. It’s in their space. Now that is the problem! That is the problem is that multiculturalism is forcing all these radically different people to live together. And we’re not meant to live that is going to be the death of us. It’s going to be the death of our culture.

 

Now these people, they have a flag, they have a tribe, they have an identity. They’re trying to rebuild their culture. Good on them. My opinion, and I think the opinion of most Aboriginals and most White people is that they should do it on their own! I think they’ve had enough help. We’ve done enough to help them, more than enough to help them. It’s not our responsibility to help them any further.

 

What part of the land are they going to get? Well, that is the most serious conversation. But the philosophy behind that conversation I think is congruent. I think we can, I think all Australians can get on board with the idea that we have a two-state solution, at a minimum. To me, that’s the minimum. If they want to go to war with us, that’s a different conversation.

 

But I think you’ll find that there could be conversations where they have their own government, they have their own schools, they have their own institutions. Are they going to be as good as ours? No, they’re not. Is that going to cause the bleeding hearts to be like:

 

“See we’re still continuing to oppress them by keeping them separate!”

 

And there’ll be an anti-apartheid argument, but apartheid is the most beneficial thing for both parties. Because they will never have dignity, they will never have sovereignty and they will never have dignity while we play this passive aggressive game where they’re trying to rule over us and we’re trying to say we’re all friends, Kumbaya. That is never, while both of us are actually suffering. So I’ve said in the past things like if they want to, if they want to fight, they might get deported too. They’ll get deported back to India. They walked here 40,000 years ago. They might get told to walk back.

 

And I’ve said things like those are very strong comments and obviously a lot of Aboriginal people want to fight me because of those comments.

 

But that is my position. I’m not backing down on that. I’m never going to change my mind on that is my position. It’s a two-state solution or it’s that because we cannot continue. And when we take power in this country, and we are going to take power in this country, we are going to solve this question and we are going to say:

 

“Let’s sit down, let’s draw up the map and here is a fundamental treaty of you will not let China put bases on your land, you will not let any foreigners put bases on your land, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Like there will be a treaty that will say:

 

“You are a vassal of our realm. This is Australdom, this is our realm, you’re a vassal, you’ve got a territory, you self govern it.”

 

Whether we trade or buy or sell or communicate with each other, whether there’s tourist visas, all this is downstream. We can work something out where they can come visit us and we can go visit them.

 

[28:08]

 

The bleeding hearts can go live with the Aboriginals. But you will not put Chinese bases on it. Like this is fortress Australia. We’re not going to tolerate it and you guys can police yourselves. You can have your own laws, you can have your own courts, you can have your own koori justice and your own jails and your own prisons, and all the complaints that they have all solved overnight. All solved overnight. We have nothing to do with it. We have nothing to do with it. We have no part of it! You want to go spear each other, that’s your culture. That we’re not going to intervene. And that is the absolute best outcome for everyone involved! That it’s the best compromise for us. Certainly it’s the best compromise. Is it perfect? Is it ideal? Can we purity spiral and get a better result? Sure, absolutely!

 

Is that feasible? Of course, anything is feasible if you put your mind to it. Is that how the Australian public feel? No, the Australian public don’t feel that there could be something more than that. There might be people that want to do more than that and go further, certainly. And that ethnic tension arises from living together. But I think once you find, once you take that step in that direction, I think you will find that tension will disappear.

 

So when people say to me:

 

“Tom you know why are we doing this? Anti Aboriginal rhetoric and da, da and we should try to win the Aboriginals over and we should., …”

 

The way they’re talking is they’re treating Aboriginals the same way. They’re like:

 

“We should try to win women over. We should try to win!”

 

It’s kind of similar to attitude. It’s like that’s not how it works. You don’t win Aboriginals over by pandering to them. You don’t win women over by pandering to them. I know they’re two very different biological forms. You know, obviously one is male and female. One is just female. You know, when we’re talking about women, we’re talking about White women, obviously. And I’m not making any further comparisons in that regard.

 

But if you understand, what I’m saying is the politics of the White man, the politics of the White Patriarchy, is not about pandering! Our politics is about laying down the law, explaining what we’re going to do and why we’re going to do it and how we’re going to do it. And then saying:

 

“This is the best outcome for everyone. What we’re doing right now is not working and we’re not making any further compromises on that’s the line in the sand.”

 

We’re actually only going to go further than that, we’re not going to come any less than that.

 

There is never, in my opinion, there’s never going to be a time where I or the vast majority of White people in Australia are going to accept are our slow ethnic replacement. It might appear that way right now, but it’s only because we’re not politically organised. This is not how the average Australian feels. This is not how the average White person around the world feels. The average White person around the world wants re-migration. They want to remain, at a minimum, 90%. That’s like the beginning. That’s not even, like controversial anymore, that the 90% or the 95% rule. That is the super majority of the population. I just like deport all of them except the good ones. That’s the super majority. And then you’ve probably still got the majority saying:

 

“No, no, it shouldn’t be 90, it should be 99%.”

 

So, yeah, anyway, I’ll pause there. I won’t cover that subject much more. Oh, my God! There’s a sorry, there’s a spastic in the chat. How do I do ban this person for life? I don’t want to mute. I keep making this mistake. If I mute, then I can’t ban. Isn’t that right? Okay, that just deleted it. Oh, yeah. Also muting on Rumble because Odysee is different. Muting on Rumble is banning. Cool. Glad we got that sorted.

 

I’ll go through the comments section. If there’s any comments on the Aboriginal question. Geez, everyone’s just arguing about Christianity. We’re not even talking about Christianity. We’re just talking about Aboriginals at this stage.

 

So, yeah, in short, as I said before, tell your friends that say this nonsense to you about how we should work together:

 

“We all got to work together. We all got to work together.”

 

They can have full sovereignty over themselves, but not us. Or they can have this fake sovereignty over everyone. Do they actually want full sovereignty? If they do, it can only be over themselves. That means apartheid. Ultimately, that means apartheid. What that looks like is a man can’t serve the Australian flag and the Aboriginal flag. You can’t go to a at the high school, at the courts, all these institutions. It’s got an Australian flag and it’s got an Aboriginal flag. That is not sustainable. It’s one or the other. It can’t be both.

 

And this idea of:

 

“Oh, we got to show solidarity and they’re not a threat to us and all this.”

 

It’s not sustainable. It’s not sustainable. It’s nice. Tingle feels. It feels really nice:

 

“Oh, look, I’m being empathetic. Oh, I’m a good person.”

 

You can have this virtue signaling, but we’re two very different peoples. We need to have sovereignty over ourselves. They need to have sovereignty over themselves. We need to be focused on Australia and White people and civilisation, the Western civilisation that we’re a part of, and they need to be focused on creating their own harmony, the dream time, their version of reality, fixing their problems, punishing their problems. They have a completely different version of reality to us. That is just how different ethnic groups and different races are built. They have different versions of reality. Things we see as a problem that they see it like a major problem, they see as a minor problem, and vice versa. Their biggest issue is White people are locking them up and putting them in jail. Like, they can’t even comprehend that our problem is that they’re committing heinous crimes. They can’t even comprehend that’s a problem. They see the problem as:

 

“Why are you locking us up?”

 

[35:04]

 

It’s the same with the blacks in America. How can these two groups of people live together when they have completely different versions of reality? So they should police themselves. Simple as! Part sovereignty over all or full sovereignty over part.

 

So you can’t have both. Simple. As I’ll move on. Hopefully the comment section is not talking about Christianity, someone says:

 

“Do I make my own toothpaste?”

 

Very funny. Yeah. And this applies not just to Australia, this applies to obviously, Canada and New Zealand as well. I think the Treaty of Waitangi is a mistake in New Zealand. I don’t know too much about the treaties in Canada. I know Alex Ferryman does. Yeah, it’s a mistake. It’s a mistake. Any treaty that exists needs to be a treaty of:

 

“Here’s your space. Here’s our space. You live there, we live here. You’re citizens of your country. We’re citizens of our country. We’re two separate nations. We’re not the same nation.”

 

They even call themselves the first nation so that by definition, they’re not part of our nation. They’re saying this. They’re saying this, not me. They are saying it. What else?

 

Let’s get into the nuts and bolts. The woman question. I need a need a breather. If we’re going to get into the woman question. I need a breather. Yeah. Someone says:

 

“Easiest solution is allow those same bleeding hearts to transfer their own funds to Aboriginals, not government or social funds. The Left can put their money where their mouth is.”

 

Yeah, absolutely! Well, I believe that all the bleeding hearts should go live with the Aboriginals. They should have Aboriginal citizenship. They want to be so bad. They hate White people so much. They hate being White!:

 

“White people are horrible, horrible people! And having White children is perpetuating White supremacy and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”

 

Good bye. Bye. See you later. Awesome! You know, we’ll strip all of these people of Australian citizenship when we come to power and there will be people that will say:

 

“Oh, my God, you can’t do that!”

 

Yes, we can and we will. They’re all going to get stripped of their Australian citizenship. These White people that work, that bow down and worship Aboriginals as their god. They can go live with their god. They can go live with their god. Simple. You know, you want to do the Welcome to Country acknowledgment of country, all this. Absolutely perfect! Perfect. Absolutely! Bye. Bye. Yeah, we don’t want those people living in our society. It doesn’t matter that they’re of the same blood as us. That doesn’t matter because they’re not of the same honour as us. They hate us! There are some sort of mutation of our bloodline that is antithetical to our existence. If Aboriginals didn’t exist, they would find some other group to nut hug. Hypothetically, because there’s no Aboriginals in England. Like you don’t see people advocating for the pre-Belgic-Celtic invasion of Bronze Age England. That doesn’t exist. You know, what kind of strain of Leftism would that be? You know, it’s obviously absurd because you’ve got a thousand years of homogeneity of many different layers of Celtic peoples then breeding in with many different layers of Germanic and Nordic peoples.

 

So it’s the English people, the British people are a relatively homogenised people. And so you don’t see that argument because those tribes can homogenise quite. I mean, obviously it still caused things like, I mean, I don’t want to get too much into the intricacies of English history, but you can see the precursor of things like civil war in previous ethnic distinctions.

 

So, for example, Croatia and Serbia are ethnically very similar, but they’re not ethnically the same. They are two different ethnicities and therefore they also have two different versions of their interpretation of Christianity. You’ve got Orthodoxy and you’ve got Catholicism. So ethnic differences play out also religiously and also politically. You’ll see this a lot through human history. You see it in the American Civil War. There was an ethnic difference in the American Civil War as well. Probably not as predominant, but I won’t go into it. Americans know that for themselves.

 

Now someone says:

 

“Tom’s right. They have a different reality. Go to any Northern Territory prison and you’ll see the system isn’t working.”

 

It’s not working by our standards. Absolutely! Our version, our reality of working and their version of working are two completely different things.

 

And I’ll finish it with this. I had a Dreamtime experience with Aboriginals. I’m sure I’ve told this story on stream years ago, so those that have been around a while will remember this story. But I had a friend in the army, a guy called Christopher Knight. He was a Special Forces guy. He’s a translator, he’s a linguist. And I don’t know what he’s doing now with his life, but I’m sure he’s doing well. And he was adopted. He got adopted in a cultural sense, or a linguistic sense by an Aboriginal. An Aboriginal tribe in Darwin in Northern Territory. And this guy was a, like one of those, what is called politician-linguist or something. This guy spoke like 50 languages. It was incredible! I’ve never seen anything like it. I mean, we would go out drinking in Mitchell street or whatever it’s called in the CBD of Darwin. It’s like one street and there’s like four bars on it. And any backpacker, he could speak their language. Any backpacker. It was really incredible!

 

[41:09]

 

Anyway on his weekends, he was going out and living with Aboriginals out in the middle of nowhere. And there were like some, there were full bloods and it’s very rare to find full bloods, but in Northern Territory it’s more common. There’s no way you can find full bloods outside of Northern Territory or Northern New, Southern Queensland or Northern WA. And he started hanging out with these, basically semi-nude Aboriginals in the bushland near Casuarina Beach on the weekends. And he knocks on my door. I don’t know, it was like one in the morning, one random. It was like a Tuesday, or a Thursday. And he says:

 

“Hey Tom or hey Sewell.”

 

Everyone calls you by your last name in the army:

 

“Hey Sewelly, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. They need a linguist. He was a two commando guy, but for some reason he was in our battalion. And he says, I’m getting deployed tomorrow. I’m getting on a plane and I have to say goodbye to some people and I had to run some errands. Can you drive me?”

 

Because I was one of the only LID, which lid means new guy or live in digger. I was one of the only LID that had a car. And I was friendly with him, and everyone thought he was a weirdo and I did as well. Weird means different things to me than it does to other people. When someone says weird, they mean like not radioactive, but they mean, you know, semi-ostracized. They mean:

 

“Oh, we don’t associate with that guy because he’s a weirdo!”

 

Whereas when someone’s weird, I am fascinated by human psychology. And so I was always very friendly with him because I wanted to know what made him tick. He had such a different version of reality to everyone else that I just really wanted to understand. I mean this guy was probably in his early 30s and I think I was 19 or 20 at the time.

 

So I was like:

 

“Unk, how do you view the world? What’s going on, Unk?”

 

Basically I was the same relationship I have with Zoomers and is like that relationship when I was The Age that a lot of Zoomers are that asked me for advice And I’m now. I’m now 90.

 

But anyway, he says, he’s like:

 

“Sewelly, you’re the only one with a car. You know, can you drive me around? I gotta say goodbye to some people.”

 

And so he drives me out in the middle of nowhere, and then we go walking for like 40 minutes down this beach. And I’m like:

 

“What are we doing?”

 

And we find these Aboriginals just on this beach in the middle of nowhere. And they’re all sitting cross legged and around a little campfire. And he introduces me to them and he’s speaking their language, like full Aboriginal! Like whatever sect of Aboriginal they are. And he’s speaking their language. And he introduces me and he says a bunch of Aboriginal words.

 

And then he says my name. And then he says:

 

“5 RAR, 5th Battalion.”

 

And I was like:

 

“What did you say to them?”

 

And he said:

 

“You’re a young warrior from my tribe, from the 5th Battalion tribe. And that you’re a good warrior. You’re a good, young, strong warrior and that you’re helping me today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh.”

 

And then they all, like, acknowledged me. They’re all sitting different. So it was men. I was sitting with the men, obviously, and the women were sitting at a different campfire with the women, and it was segregated.

 

And so I was with the men and Knighty was explaining to them how I was a good warrior, a good young warrior of the 55 RAR tribe. And we’re sitting there and they’re just talking and talking, and I went into a trance. I was tired, but I didn’t know what was, … It was like someone had drugged me. I was in a trance and I was just staring at the ocean, because we’re on the beach. And I was staring at the ocean and the sky was purple.

 

And I was like:

 

“Is there something in this fireplace? Like, what? Like, am I on?”

 

I’ve never at this stage, I’d never tried any drug ever!

 

And I was like:

 

“Is this what acid feels like?”

 

That’s what I was thinking in my head.

 

And I was like:

 

“What is going on?”

 

And they’re making that noise that they make. They’re talking and yeah. And then the sun’s coming up and I’m like, what is going on? And I look at the time and it’s like 6:30. And it was just surreal! It was a surreal experience. And then he’s like:

 

“All right, we’re gonna go.”

 

He gave them bananas and double A batteries. And he taught them how to like Jerry rig a phone to be able to give co-ordinates so that he could communicate where they were in the bush using GPS. And it was just fascinating! It was just absolutely fascinating! That was my first positive experience with Aboriginals. And I had had only about 500 negative experiences with Aboriginals prior to that moment. And every negative experience I’d had with Aboriginals was them being drunk, or not even drunk, but them just behaving the way they behave, and then being violent and aggressive towards me for just existing, for just walking down the street or just going to the shops at two o’ clock in the afternoon. Or them harassing like pregnant ladies trying to get in their car, demanding money off them. Like just every experience I had was so negative.

 

[46:02]

 

And then this was the first time I was like:

 

“I think I’m starting to understand these people. They live in a dream time.”

 

Like the proper full bloods. They live in a different reality to us. They don’t like time. The way we view time and the way they view time is completely different! And I somehow empathed in that moment into their little hive mind with Knightie, who was like my guide. His name was Christopher Knight, like a knight of Christ! And he was a very spiritually attuned man. And that was an experience I’ll never forget. I think I was almost, 20 years old. I was only 19!

 

But yeah, very interesting stuff. Very, very interesting stuff.

 

The stream looks frozen on my end. What is going on? No, no, it’s not frozen. Excellent! Yeah. What can I say? What can I say? I’ve seen the best of it and I’ve seen the worst of it. And the best of it is we should just leave these people alone. Like the problem is enlightenment. In a lot of ways, [chuckling] enlightenment has benefits, certainly. I’m not anti-enlightenment. You know, that’s a big part of how we’ve come to be. And it was a big part of our life cycle as a civilisation. It’s the second last phase of civilisation is enlightenment. The Greeks went through this around, I don’t know, 400 B.C. And yeah, I’m not against, you can’t be against it because it’s nature, it’s time itself.

 

But one of the dumbest parts of enlightenment is “equality”. That’s the dumbest part of enlightenment. The, the, that is the false enlightenment. The false enlightenment is that we’re all blank slates and that we’re all equal. That you know:

 

“All men are created equal before God and blah blah, blah!”

 

That is the most. How the hell. I don’t even know if they sincerely believe that. I can’t even fathom that they were that stupid that the people that colonised Australia, … Because when I read Clark, I’ve got it right here actually, this one here.

 

So this guy’s a communist. He’s a piece of shit, Leftist communist! And he wrote A History of Australia. I have, I’ve only read this one. I haven’t read the other volumes. I think this one ends around 1830. And he wrote this in I think 1961 or 62. And he’s a full blown communist and was investigated by ASIO for being, for coordinating with. Here’s the big boy here. Here’s the main man. Here’s the main man. Mr. Cook. Captain Cook. Anglo Saxon. Anglo Saxon. But yeah, Melbourne University. He’s a commie at Melbourne University.

 

Anyway, I read it. It’s quite interesting, quite subversive. But he, oh, he really emphasises the how enlightened Captain Cook and you know, Arthur Bligh and all these guys were and how they, but what’s interesting is he can’t hide the fact that despite their Enlightenment, despite the fact that they. Excuse me. They arrived in Australia and they tried to treat the Aboriginals as equals.

 

And so they’re like:

 

“Hey, let’s trade.”

 

And then there was nothing to trade. So they were like:

 

“Hey, let’s, …”

 

It was like a clash of values because they had these Enlightenment values and they didn’t know how to implement them on the Aboriginals. They didn’t know.

 

And so there was a whole bunch of different treat ways the Aboriginals were treated by European colonists. And I think it was the Portuguese and the Spanish in the Americas, but a little bit even in the Asia Pacific region, the Portuguese were in Asia Pacific as well. And they were basically like:

 

“You’re going to convert to Catholicism by the sword!”

 

And what Clark says is that they didn’t have those Enlightenment values. So you’ve got like Protestant Anglos trying to communicate with Aboriginals and like uplift them into humanity and uplift them into civility.

 

And then you’ve got the Portuguese with almost like pre-Enlightenment Catholic values that were just like “convert or die”. And that’s quite interesting. You know, it’s possible to talk about history without talking about Christianity. But yeah, that’s quite interesting. I won’t expand on that too much. You can gather from that what you want.

 

Yeah, where was I going with that? Yeah, he has all these little anecdotes or all these little stories about these first encounters and how, yeah, the enlightened English were just bewildered and were just like:

 

“We’ve never encountered this anywhere in the world!”

 

And he’s actually honest about the criticisms that they had. I think he might over embellish their enlightenment principles. I think they were probably a lot more racist than what he’s articulating because he’s a communist.

 

But yeah, I think I titled this Aboriginal communism, didn’t I? Before we get into the woman question, ultimately, if we don’t segregate from Aboriginals, we’re going to get destroyed by Aboriginal communism the way that what’s going on in South Africa, they’re dealing with African communism. And when you end apartheid and you mix or you attempt to get the races to all live together in equality and one is so different to the other, it’s a race to the bottom! And that’s ultimately what communism is, it’s a race to the bottom.

 

And it’s not just anti-enlightenment because there’s a lot of things that are anti-enlightenment, but it is anti-life! It’s ultimately anti-life because our version of life is an upward force, not a, so it’s hard to cover this without getting into the Greeks. You got to get into the Greeks because they figured all this out! And I don’t mean like the Greeks is in the souvlaki shop. I mean like the ancient Greeks, the philosophy.

 

The Greeks realised that when they went through their enlightenment that there’s not just being, there’s becoming. And that the ultimate being is becoming. And we use the word “progress” now and that word is obviously really dirty and that’s why I don’t use it. It’s a very dirty word. To say something is “progressive”, you’re saying it’s Leftist.

 

[53:19]

 

And so the Leftists have actually somehow inverted “becoming” into “progression”. And so when they say it’s progressive, it’s actually regressive! It’s regressive of the total life force. Leftism is the downward path. It’s not Left versus Right, it’s up versus down! And this is something that you really need to understand. Communism, Aboriginal communism, jewish communism, any form of communism, any form of Leftist progression is a progression downwards! It’s progressing the life form downwards. And this applies to even politics of today.

 

So if you want to talk about party politics, if you want to call it that if you want to talk about Parliamentarianism, what the Labor Party here in. I know this is people like, I’m tuning out. I don’t want to hear this. But normies want to hear this. Normies, you do need to. If you’re listening to this, you’re probably not a normie. And you do need to know how to apply the logic that I’m articulating here in the stream to things other than ancient Greece and ancient Rome and like all this stuff, you need to be able to apply it to be able to explain it to, … You need to be able to speak in tongues and that doesn’t mean like that crazy Evangelical crap. That means you need to be able to speak the tongue of the people.

 

And so what the Labor Party here in Australia has done is they’ll get lost on this because they haven’t read a book on economics, but it’s this Keynesian economics where it’s window breaking. So they believe that if you keep breaking windows, the GDP will go up because the glazier is going to make more money. And, it’s all that in conjunction with Fabian socialism. So Fabian socialism is what:

 

“We want the windows to be broken because we want more money wasted on fixing windows instead of building the power system.”

 

And so Fabian socialists or Fabian Communists, Fabian Marxists. They’re ultimately Marxists. They want to create this workers revolution through accelerating the decline of society by wasting as much money as possible.

 

And so that’s why the NDIS is the way it is. That’s why the NDIS is bigger than the defense budget. That’s why we spend more money on parasites and retards than we do on protecting the nation from foreign invasion. It’s why we spend so much money on basically compounding problems. Not fixing problems, but compounding problems! And the problem itself is often the expenditure, the wastage, the fact that we’re taxing the noble, the good, the healthy, and we’re giving to the evil and the weak and the disgusting and the decrepit.

 

And this is Kali Yuga stuff. This is end of time stuff. This is what Hitler talks about in Mein Kampf. Why you have to read Mein Kampf. It’s not negotiable. It’s not negotiable! If there’s only one book you should read, it’s Mein Kampf, because he explains all of this. He explains exactly what’s happening, exactly why it’s happening and exactly what you need to do to stop it from continuing to destroy your society.

 

So that’s why they’re window breaking. That’s why the Labor Party and all the Greenies and all these freaks, they’re all on board with destroying society through taking money from good people and giving it to broken people. And what that does is that what you feed grows. And they know that! They know that! They know it and they’ve already projected how that industry is going to expand. And it is beyond political parties. I mean it’s the Uni-Party doing it. It’s not just the Labor Party. But it obviously gets worse under one and then the other does Labor Party light. They do Fabian socialism light. That’s what the Liberal Party is. It’s homosexuality light. Fabian socialism light. Retard economics light. You know it’s diet retardation!

 

Anyway. Aboriginal communism. Yeah. Where are we? Yeah. I don’t normally do Superchats mid conversation but Delvian said:

 

“Isn’t the abo love a second order consequence of White men becoming feminised and White women hating their own men?”

 

There’s definitely an element to that. I think there’s a lot of different components to the so-called “Aboriginal love”. There’s the false enlightenment, there’s self hatred. Yes. There’s virtue signaling. So society is structured wrong, which is what we’re going to get into with the feminine society and the woman question. Society is structured with an inversion of natural law. The moral framework of society is an inversion of what our society was built on.

 

So that is often described as late stage decline or degeneration where you forget what your purpose was to such an extent where it’s upside down. There’s obviously nefarious influence. There’s particular (((interest groups))) that are a particular ethno-religious orientation and they compound and accelerate and destabilise. Certainly. They’re obviously a major player in that process but it does happen on its own. And you know there’s a lot of, I won’t go into all the proverbs and quotes on the subject but this festering can only exist if you’re already going in that direction. What we need is a complete re-evaluation of values. And you know we have gone through two or three generations of a nihilist phase and we are re interpreting and revaluing our values. We are so far ahead morally of where we were 50 years ago. And people will aay:

 

“No! That’s not true. No! People were so conservative back in the day.”

 

And it’s like they were running off inertia. They hadn’t actually evaluated their values. They were just running off inertia. We’re actually so much further ahead by going through the decline, seeing the nihilism, seeing the hedonism.

 

[1:00:19]

 

 

And I have so much faith and hope in the young generation. Young White people across the world, obviously, a lot of them are infected with the social disease. A lot of them are infected. But the ones that aren’t infected with the social disease have immunity. They have immunity! They have built up. They don’t need to be injected with anything. They have natural immunity! Young White people across the Western world are growing up immune to this social disease. And the disease of our time is not the plague. It’s not the Spanish Flu. It’s not? What is it? You know, all the ones that people, tuberculosis. It’s not these things that are killing people anymore, you know.

 

And Edward Dutton covers this a lot. I’ve talked about this on streams for years and years, and I’m so glad someone actually wrote a book about it. I’ve only read the blurb. I haven’t actually read the whole book, but I might actually get around to reading it at some point. But Dutton covers this and he explains that just the mutational load has the selection process now is, are you a retard or are you not? And if you’re not a retard, you’re most likely immune to the retardation that’s destroying our society.

 

So, yeah. All right, we’ll do it. We’ll go into the woman question. Check the comments first. Someone says:

 

“Ban women!”

 

No, we don’t need to ban them. Reese White says:

 

“Thomas. So are you a fan of Adam Green?”

 

I don’t really know anything about Adam Green. I’ve seen him on Twitter. He’s the anti-Christian guy, isn’t he? He’s kind of built like a platform. I haven’t seen him at all! I’ve never spoken to him. I don’t really know anything about him. I only know of him. Yeah, I can’t comment on that question. I’ve seen a lot of people attack him saying he’s jewish, and I’ve seen him say that Christianity is jewish.

 

So it’s like everyone’s saying:

 

“You’re a jew! No, you’re a jew! No, you’re a jew!”

 

And it’s like I’m not getting into it. It’s not in my sphere. I think I’ve seen him do chats with HT [Handsome Truth]. Yeah, we will cover a little bit of Christianity here. But yeah, you all know I’m not Christian. But we will cover it and we’ll cover it in a respectful way. I think that any criticism people have of Christianity should be done respectfully. I know that’s hard to do. It is very hard to do. But this is a, yeah, I try to be as secular as possible and yeah, let’s start with that. Let’s actually start with Christianity.

 

Let’s start with. If we’re going to talk about the woman question, let’s talk about Christianity.

 

So the Hebrew mythology or the Hebrew founding story is Adam and Eve. It’s a bit different to other founding stories, but you’ll find there’s so much similarities when you’re talking about the origins of man from. And I don’t use mythology. I don’t say mythology in a bad way. I don’t say it in a, I don’t mean it in a negative way. I’m not putting a pejorative on it. You know, all founding myth is myth. It’s mythos. We don’t know for sure, but we can respect myth. I respect myth. Yeah, and geez, we’re already into it.

 

But we all know the story Genesis. So we have this perfect garden of peace and harmony and the founding story of Christianity and therefore the founding message, the founding message of Christianity is that women are inherently attracted to evil. And breaching the peace and harmony of the garden that’s created by the father.

 

So it’s kind of like women inherently have to “shit test” a situation, a society, a these aren’t my words. This is not even my personal interpretation. I didn’t come up with this is what the Bible says.

 

And anyone that has a different version of Genesis is a moron and hasn’t read it. So many Christians haven’t read the Bible. Probably one of my main issues with Christians is that they haven’t read the Bible. I don’t think you should be allowed to call yourself a Christian if you haven’t read the Bible.

 

And likewise, I don’t think people should call themselves a National Socialist if they haven’t read Mein Kampf. I don’t think you should say that. I think you should say I’m interested in National Socialism, but I don’t think you should identify with it. You should hear the words from the man. He says it all. He outlines 95% of it in one book. And it’s a lot easier to read than the Bible. The Bible is a very hard book to read. It’s very tedious at parts. It, sure, it has beautiful parts, like all religious books have beautiful parts, but it is a very hard read. It’s a very long book. It’s like a million words. It takes a long time. Unless you race through it, if you race through it, you’re going to miss things. But Genesis is very clear. Like the first books, Genesis and Exodus, these things are very clear. Very, very clear. There’s no, not much nuance to it.

 

Now there’s obviously different mythological interpretations. What is the snake and what is the apple and what is God’s command and all this. But if you’re going to found a religion off this principle, it’s going to bleed through the whole text, isn’t it?

 

So whatever you’re reading later on in the Bible has to always come back to Genesis and a belief system that men and women were created unequally, that man was created from breathing life into dust or into matter. Women were created from the rib of man, so from the side. So it’s a peer, but it’s not an equal peer. There’s some sort of difference there. And so, I mean, obviously.

 

[1:07:14]

 

But I was talking to Jacob recently and he’s been deep diving Plato. Absolutely deep diving Plato. I’ve read the Republic, but I haven’t read much else from Plato. And he was negging Aristotle, which I was surprised at because I actually prefer, at this stage, I prefer Aristotle to Plato, not to get too much into philosophy, but I’ve only read the Republic. So and I didn’t really rate it, to be honest. I thought it was an interesting dialogue, but I didn’t rate it as much as it gets glazed. But he’s been reading all the other stuff. Full deep diving into everything, every single thing the guy’s written. And what he said to me was, and this is very recently, he said to me that the Greeks believed that, or Plato believed, and this became quite a common belief system, that if that souls were created, this is before Christianity, they believe that souls were created fresh and that they were all men, that if you lived a bad life, if you were a bit, you know, weak or immoral, that you would be reincarnated in your next life as a woman. And this became a pretty well established belief system. And it’s interesting that that is in some way similar to Christianity, that they arrived at a position where they were ripe for proselytisation from Christian apostles.

 

So let’s start there. Obviously, European Paganism is many things, just as Christianity is many things. There’s so much schism within Paganism. And when you’re talking generally about Paganism, you’re talking about general principles which we know from Greek, Roman, Zoroastrian, Indus Valley, and obviously Germanic and Celtic Paganism. And people will cherry pick what they want.

 

There are female church leaders at the moment. I mean, that’s just absurd to me that the whole book is a document saying that women can’t accurately interpret God. They can’t accurately communicate or interpret or follow instruction from God. And therefore they shouldn’t be in charge of the Church. They can’t be in charge of society, they can’t be in charge of the Church. They just don’t possess the correct component to do that. And the whole religion is founded on that principle.

 

And then you have such a degradation of the Church that you now have women pastors and preachers and priests, priestesses or whatever you’d call them. I mean, it’s absurd! It’s not my church, I’m not a Christian. But the hypocrisy is despicable! It is truly despicable! So fascinating!

 

Now, Paganism has varying degrees of male and female relationships. Some interpretations of Paganism are a bit more equitable, others a lot less equitable.

 

So when we go back to the ancients and when we look at thousands of years of civilisation, there is not really any society that has treated men and women as the same, nor has there been a society that has treated women the way women are being treated right now! And it’s not a surprise that our birth rates are really low. Any society that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any civilisation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies. Any nation that behaves the way we’re behaving dies! And therefore it is a footnote in somebody else’s history.

 

So we have to reevaluate our values and we have to completely change the way we behave or we’re going to die!

 

And so the woman question is the same question as White genocide. It’s the same question as White replacement. You cannot separate the two. You can’t say:

 

“Let’s stick to just White nationalism and let’s not talk about how evil feminism is. Let’s talk about White replacement. But we’ve got to keep women on side. We can’t say things that might hurt the feelings of women.”

 

And as I said at the start of the stream, this is a really dumb, weak, coward strategy that’s going to cause us to die as a race! Women don’t respect pandering. They find it disgusting! Feminists are pure evil! And they will because of there’s some force, you know, Christians could say they’re possessed. And I do put a lot of weight in possession. I know not everyone does because not everyone believes they have a soul. And not everyone believes in metaphysics or in like a spirit realm. And so people that are very rational will say:

 

“This person’s unwell, or this person’s mentally ill.”

 

All means the same thing. Whereas the more religious or spiritual way of looking at it is this person is spiritually ill, this person’s potentially possessed. And this isn’t very electable, but I have witnessed what I could only describe as exorcisms. I have seen the way some people have behaved, and there is no rational or logical explanation other than this person is possessed. This person has a demon, a demon in them! They’re not at rest. They’re not in harmony. They’re not. There’s something that is currently occupying them and it’s potentially just a phase, but if it keeps occurring, it’s like there’s something that rears its head, something unbecoming.

 

And that’s a difficult conversation to have with people that don’t believe in demons. They don’t believe that it could be possible. They’re so far into post Enlightenment rationalism that just:

 

“It’s so irrational, the idea that there are forces beyond our control that could perhaps be bad forces!”

 

You know, we can acknowledge that there is a good force and inherently good force on earth, but then we want to pretend that there’s not an inherently bad force on earth?

 

[1:13:57]

 

So instead of arguing about whether Christianity is cucked or not, instead a better conversation is, what can we learn from Christianity? Where is Christianity right? And where is modern Christianity wrong? Or where is Christianity philosophically wrong? That’s a much more important discussion and it’s a more respectful discussion as well. Because what you’ll find is I can have these conversations. I had a conversation recently, probably 20, 30 minutes, with some Christian guys in America, and we could have a respectful conversation about what’s happening through that lens, through that lens of that there is an evil that is possessing. There is a snake in the garden, and it’s corrupting women. And then women are corrupting men. And that women, sorry, men, are aware of the snake. Snake, but most men are not aware of how this snake has perverted women.

 

And so the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read] is we need to normalise Patriarchy. I’m a big, big proponent of Patriarchy. I think that Patriarchy is the only way to save the White race. We cannot save the White race through feminism. We cannot save the White race through equality. We can only save the White race through a proper Patriarchy. A proper Patriarchy! And whether you’re Christian, pagan, agnostic, enlightened, not enlightened, Catholic, orthodox, doesn’t matter! We cannot solve male, female. It does not matter! We cannot solve this problem without Patriarchy.

 

Now, it’s very easy for me to acknowledge Patriarchy because, one, I had a really good father. I have a really good father. My father’s still alive. I have a really good father. A really good father! And he has his flaws. Absolutely! And that’s product of environment and breeding and everything else. Right. We all have our flaws. I have my flaws. Product of environment and breeding and circumstance. But we’re on a mission! My bloodline has definitely been through the wars, and we’re on our way back up. All right. There’s a few more generations of work to do to really get us back on track. But I’m part of a Patriarchy. I have a lot of respect for my family name, my line, my lineage, my ancestry. This is really important to me.

 

And, it’s easy for me to accept and acknowledge this harsh reality. It’s not even a harsh reality. This reality because of what I come from. Women that have good fathers can accept this as well. Most women that can’t accept Patriarchy, they don’t have any respect for their fathers. And they don’t have respect for their fathers because their fathers don’t deserve respect.

 

Respect is not something that you’re entitled to. It is only earned. And I know that’s a platitude, and some people might think that’s a meaningless platitude, but that is absolutely core! Respect is earned! You’re not entitled to anyone’s respect. This is, I think, a false enlightenment principle that, like you should just respect the retard being moved around in the wheelchair. Like, what? What planet are these people on? Like, why that makes you a good person? How does that make me a good person? You know what quality of life is the drooling retard, God? And why are we wasting all our tax dollars paying for the drooling retard? This is solved very easily by Patriarchy. It’s not just solved by having a department in government that deals with the problem. It’s solved by Patriarchy.

 

And so one of the first principles of Patriarchy is that every man is king and priest and judge of his own house! I’ll say it again, for those that aren’t listening. The first principle of Patriarchy is that every man is king, is priest, is judge of his own house! And general. That was a component as well. There’s a martial component to it. And so every son, every boy wants to respect his father for the man that he is. And I can’t empath into how girls think, because I’m not a girl, but I would assume it’s similar. Not the same, but I assume it’s similar. I obviously have daughters. And you know what I was sad about when I was growing up? Not sad, but one thing I was surprised at was I asked my dad why he never joined the army. Because I know his dad was in the navy or in the Defense Force. I know his granddad was in the army.

 

And I remember asking my dad:

 

“Why weren’t you in the army?”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, look.”

 

Because they had the draught for the Vietnam War, and he was of that age, and he just never got called up. So he was like:

 

“Oh, I got lucky!”

 

That was his answer. I think he said something:

 

“I got lucky. You know, you put your birthday in. You had to register. You put your birthday in.”

 

And he said something about “balls with birthdays” on them. Like, it was like the lotto. Like, they’d pull a ball out. And if it was like, March 18th, which is my dad’s birthday, then you’re going, you’re signing up.

 

And I thought that was absurd! But it’s one way to do it. I mean, it’s fucking clown world! But anyway, that was his position, was like:

 

“Oh, he got lucky. He avoided it.”

 

And I always thought to myself, wouldn’t it be cool? I always thought, wouldn’t it be cool to walk into my dad’s office and he’s got all his, like, armour and his rifle? And I just had this idea of like. And it’s probably ancient. It’s probably something like an altar, like an altar to Mars, like an altar to masculinity, an altar to the Patriarchy. And then to be able to see my grandfathers and you know there are families that still, they keep all their family medals, the war medals and stuff.

 

[1:20:20]

 

But I mean let’s put that on steroids. It’s not just having like the medals, it’s like walk in and be able to see like generations and generations of uniforms and rifles and, or even before going all the way back to a family sword. That just, that idea is just so cool! And I think every like 10 year old boy thinks like that.

 

And if you don’t, you’re probably a faggot, or maybe you had the idea but in a different way. But if that doesn’t seem cool to you, yeah, fuck you basically! I don’t know. Yeah, you’re not in my gang, that’s for sure. You’re not in my tribe.

 

So back to the woman question. So [chuckling] respect, respect. You can respect that. And I didn’t respect my dad as much as I would have if we had something like that. If my dad had something like I kind of lost a little bit of respect for my dad when I was like 10 years old. When I was like:

 

“Why wasn’t my dad. His answer was he ‘got lucky’.”

 

I was like:

 

“Huh, I don’t know if that’s luck.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like why would that be lucky? Obviously it’s a dumb war and blah, blah, blah and geopolitics is so broken and everything now.

 

But I think part of us is whether you go and fight in a war or not, I think men should be war-like. And I think the “retard budget” should be directed entirely into well first of all we shouldn’t be taxed as much as we are. So there shouldn’t even be a retard budget.

 

But obviously I like when we take power. I’m deleting the retard budget and putting all of it or most of it or some of it into building like the Stormtrooper halo suit Department. I’ve said this before.

 

To get back onto, someone just says:

 

“Fuck employment!”

 

[chuckling] Modern world does a Superchat:

 

“Thoughts on the employee question.”

 

I actually haven’t watched the podcast that young Michael Nelson did on the subject of employment but I can imagine what he was saying. My position has always been that you need to be productive, you need to be productive, you need to find a way of being productive. You don’t want to just sit around doing nothing! But you need to have times of sitting around doing nothing in order to think of productive things to do.

 

And when you’re in employment, like I have had nothing but issues with like Gen-X’s and Boomers that have employed me over the years where they want you to work 50, 60 hour weeks, they want you just in employment, they want you just head down and just hammer drill in the concrete and just ernnn! Or if you’re doing some other job that’s slightly more technical or less manual labour, it’s the same thing. It’s just head down and you’ve just got no time, no time to be a better man. You’re just stuck in a trap! You’re stuck in like a debt trap. And I don’t think there’s ever been a time in human history where anyone except slaves have worked six days a week or even five days a week. I just think that that’s slavery and they’re boxing us in. We’re getting boxed in and boxed in and boxed in! It’s so obvious what’s happening and it’s so obvious why Zoomers especially and Gen Alpha will be even more so, why people are checking out of this employee, … We’re just getting boxed in.

 

Like we’ve gone from nice blocks of land. There’s plenty of things to do, there’s plenty of animals to tend to. And then you work a couple days a week, you know, old mate needs help with something, you go help him, this guy and people were these warrior farmer builders first, and they were doctors and doctors and dentists and lawyers and tradesmen or skilled labourers second. And it was the pleb class. It’s always historically been the pleb class that became entirely microscopically focused on a singular trade. So like I do pottery, that’s all I do they live in a tiny little house in the city in Rome and they’re the Potter. And all they do is pottery and they just make pots and nothing else. And they do it six days a week, 12 hours a day. And they make pots and they sell the pots and they make pots and they sell the pots. That is what slaves do. That’s what slaves do. That’s slavery!

 

And so, but the whole economics is geared against us because of what they’ve done, because of interest, because of debt slavery. It’s because of debt slavery we can’t build intergenerational wealth where we can have big families on large plots of land where we can learn a whole bunch of skills and manage our farms and feed ourselves and look after ourselves in tight knit communities.

 

The whole economics is now geared that everyone’s a little bug, a little cog in the system. They do their little bug roll and they get their little bug ration and this is broken. This is not sustainable. It’s not going to last. How many generations is this going to go on for? Judging by how much Zoomers want to check out, I’d suggest that Alphas or Betas or what like two or three generations from now, if this problem hasn’t solved itself, I would assume things are gonna be very different.

 

[1:26:10]

 

 

And obviously tying this into politics we’re gonna completely change the zoning laws. Part of the problem with this is people living on 200 square metre little blocks, apartments, townhouses. Part of this is just so dysgenic. We need to not be slave bug people. We need space, we need land, we need multitudes of tasks. Specialisation is key. Don’t get me wrong. We built higher civilisation because individuals did hyper specialise into things. But making pots is not a hyper specialisation. You know what I mean? Like historically people did their specialisation part time. They’d worked a couple days a week doing, and it was usually what was called journeymen. They were usually journeymen like if they were a dentist, or a doctor or whatever and obviously there was no such thing as a lawyer. The whole system worked differently, like tradition, ancient culture and the higher becoming. We have better technology now, but it’s made us, I think we can do both. I think we can continue to improve technology without living like bugs. And I don’t think that interest slavery helped us increase our technology. The increasing technology is part of the life cycle. It’s part of the life cycle of civilisation. And it’s not going to continue progressing in this direction forever for two reasons. One, the law of diminishing returns. And two, we are destroying our stock. So we can’t. We’re going to be in a system decline. The car, the calibre of men that built the society. We can’t even maintain it. We can’t even maintain it.

 

And there’s an elite. They call it elite overproduction. But it’s not. It’s the false elite overproduction. We’ve built a false elite and that’s why these rodents that are all 100, 105 IQ, they got Master’s degrees. They’re absolute midwits! They’re not idiots, but they’re absolute midwits! They are the ones running this into the ground. We have allowed midwits to take over society!

 

And I’m not going to talk about what my IQ is because I don’t think it’s super important, but I think it’s clear that it’s at least one or two standard deviations above average. And we’re having midwits go through university, male and female, and then they’re taking elite positions, but there’s not enough elite positions, so they have to create positions for these other fake elites.

 

And that’s like psychology, for example. You’ve got so many idiots going through university and studying psychology. And so we’ve created a whole industry of government rebates here in Australia and in America you’ve got all this drug prescription and all this mental illness and all this compounding issues of the parasitism of psychology. Psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapists, all of this is a parasite economy. They’re all parasites. They’re all parasites! It’s one giant parasite economy! And the purpose of it is to continue to make the problem worse so that they can have employment. And so they will never, ever be able to solve the problem because a purpose of a system is what it does.

 

So that’s just one element of university that’s caused this over education. We’ve got this over education where if you don’t go to university, you’re a moron. And it’s like we have more engineers and architects than we’ve ever had and our society is uglier and more broken! So it shows you that exclusion is the rule to greatness. You need to be exclusive in order to create hyper specialisation. You can’t just send everyone to university or the vast majority of people to university, and then think:

 

“Oh my God, society is getting so much better!”

 

It’s like, no, we’re running off the inertia of intelligent, hyper selective people. And the show’s about to come to a halt. We have printed so much money! They’re literally printing like $8 trillion, not a trillion, 8 billion dollars a day in the US to keep their bullshit fake economy going. And it’s just leading to the Weimar conditions. And we’re going to pay for all of this. We’re going to pay for all of this.

 

And that’s why you need to be prepared. You need to be prepared. And I’ve gone off topic from Patriarchy, but it all ties together. You can’t cover the subject without covering it all. Obviously. I’ll take a pause and I’ll come back.

 

Someone asked me about the employment question. Yeah. You gotta have skills. Look, you gotta have skills. Home of the brave, says:

 

“Tom, you’re the embodiment of the spiritual healing of the entire European race. Hey, we approach phase one of total re-migration of nons in the West. Segregation. Stay safe!”

 

Nah, I can’t do that on the stream. It’s a good question. I appreciate the question. Maybe I can leave that to the end. I can’t do that at this stage. I have to cover the woman question. Celine says:

 

“As a younger White woman, I’ve had to come to terms with Jesus being brown when I’ve always pictured him as a tall White man. Jesus being brown makes me deny it. Christianity is more of a woman thing.”

 

I don’t necessarily agree with. I don’t know what Jesus looked like. But I’ll tell you a really funny story. I’m not sure if I told this story on stream. Obviously all the Christian identitarians are raging at you now because they’re all saying Jesus was blonde hair, blue eyed, Aryan. I saw a really funny post yesterday or last night where some guy was saying that Jesus was Italian. He was like:

 

“He was born in Judea of the Roman province of Syria. He was therefore Roman. He was therefore Italian. Jesus was Italian!”

 

I just thought it was funny. Obviously he’s not being serious, but I wonder what the implications of everyone saying Jesus was Italian would be. And whether that’s like a bit of an icebreaker. Because it’s like people say Jesus is a jew. Well, the Bible says Jesus is a jew. And then Christian Identitarian said Jesus was like a Nordic Aryan. And then it’d be funny if we just say like:

 

“We meet at halfway and say Jesus was Sicilian or something!”

 

That’ll [chuckling] cause drama, won’t it, that one! But that just would be funny. We’re like, Jesus was White passing. That’s like the compromise. Now I know you people don’t believe in compromise. They want it one way or the other. Maybe that’ll keep the peace for like five minutes. If we just say Jesus was Italian. It’s a theory. What’s the funny story? So someone in the conversation tell me if I’ve said this before on stream. I can’t remember. Some [chuckling] guy replied, “smartest women woman”. Look, I think I’ve only told this story in person. It’s story time. I might have said it once on stream.

 

[1:33:41]

 

So the last time I was in prison last year I was in solitary confinement and I wanted a Bible. Actually, this Bible right here, this one right here. King James. I wanted a King James Bible because I got my other prison Bible. This is the prison Bible I got the first time into prison. It’s the NIV*. Look at that. [chuckling] Presented to Thomas Sewell, Melbourne Assessment Prison. That was in 2021.

 

[* The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.]

 

Anyway. This is now:

 

“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man. Adam and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame.”

 

Genesis 3:16:

 

“To the woman, he said, ‘I will make your pains in childbearing very severe. With painful labour you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you’.”

 

“Then the Lord said to Cain, where is your brother Abel? I don’t know. He replied, am I my brother’s keeper? The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen, your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for. You will be a restless wanderer of the earth.”

 

Yes, well, they got the mark on him. And I really wonder when circumcision started and when the restless wanderers of the earth started getting the anti-semitisms on him. Anyway, that’s just a theory. I won’t go too deep into that or piss people off.

 

But anyway, I got that version and I read it in full.

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow, okay!”

 

I probably should have read this the first time, but I wasn’t ready because you kind of you read the Bible when you’re a kid and you just like, you don’t read it properly, you don’t read it in full. And when you’re in solid confinement, you get a lot of time to read the Bible. And I read the NIV and I was like:

 

“Whoa, okay, this is definitely eye opening.”

 

And everyone’s trying to convert me. And I’m like:

 

“No, I can’t. Like, I just read it. I just read the whole thing. Are you kidding me?”

 

And they were like:

 

“You read the wrong translation.”

 

So then this time I went to prison. I went and got a King James. It didn’t make any difference for me. But I do think the King James is a better Bible. But story time.

 

So how did I get the King James Bible? So when I got to prison this time I got sent to Barwon, which is a much nicer prison. It’s older, but it is better. And because I was in Port Phillip before that. And they wouldn’t give me a Bible, they took my Bible off me. I got another NIV. I got a wait, is that King. No. So that’s a King James. No, they took it off me, sorry. I got that one later I got another NIV and when I got transferred from Melbourne Assessment the second time to the prison, the Barwon prison, they took my NIV off me and I had to fill out a form to get another Bible.

 

And I was like:

 

“Why? Why would you take the Bible off me? I don’t understand. Just let me keep the book.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, it’s not your property. It’s the property of the MAP.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“So you’re going to send the Bible back to the MAP, back to the other prison?”

 

It’s just crazy! But they’re just there to fuck with you. That’s their existence. And they won’t even let a non-Christian man keep his Christian book. And so then I had to fill out a form to get a Bible. And to get a Bible you had to have a meeting with a priest.

 

So if you want a Quran, you could have a meeting with an imam. If you want to. Whatever it is what it is. I don’t know what the Buddhists have. But like there was these boxes you could tick. I ticked the Christian box and I picked the Anglican one because I’m an Anglo Saxon and I’m not a Catholic, I’m not orthodox, and my grandmother was Anglican. None of the men in my family went to church really, but the women did. And they were Anglicans and so, Church of England. So I picked the Anglican box and it took two weeks.

 

And then this guy, I get pulled out of my cell and I get put in like a visitor room and I’m put in there with a priest. And I’ll just check the comments. Have I told this story on stream? Because I won’t go into too much detail if I have. Oh Jesus, so many comments. Have I told this story before? I’ll just tell the story!

 

And so he was like. I asked him:

 

“Why are you Christian?”

 

And he told me a story. The priest, he said that when he was a teenager he was really angry and him and his mates went out to this golf course and they had a BB gun and they shot a bunch of magpies or something. A bird, I can’t remember what type of bird I think was a magpie. Magpies. And he just felt horrible! He just felt horrible about it afterwards. He had a lot of regret and guilt about killing these magpies.

 

[1:40:02]

 

And then, he was raised in a Christian household, in a Christian environment, but he just wouldn’t go to church. And after like leaving the Church for a year or two and kind of hanging out with the wrong kids and you know, doing bad stuff, like shooting magpies with BB guns, as like most 14 year old boys probably would if they had a BB gun, he started noticing the kids walking home from church. They just looked happier. They just looked happier. And he was like:

 

“I wanted that happiness. I wasn’t happy and I wanted that happiness. And so I started going back to church and I asked my priest, when I was 14, I said I want to be happy like the other kids, they’re all happy. Why am I happy? And the priest said to me, you have to surrender yourself to God. You have to be God’s slave. You have to submit yourself. And once you submit yourself, then you’ll be happy. Then you’ll finally find peace. Because you’re fighting God and that’s why you’re unhappy. And you just have to stop fighting. You have to give up! And when you give up and you let go, then you’ll finally be happy.”

 

And he says:

 

“Why do you ask?”

 

And I was like:

 

“So I asked because I’m not Christian, but I ticked the Anglican box because it was the closest thing that I could do. But what I really want is a Bible. So I’ve got something to read in here because they’re torturing me and I’d like a Bible.”

 

And he was just like:

 

“Oh, okay, okay, yeah, but why do you want to know why I’m a Christian?”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m just fascinated. I want to know your story. Like you’re a priest. Like you’re obviously highly motivated to be a Catholic, Anglican priest. You know, I just, I want to learn more about your journey and like how that, how do you become an Anglican priest?”

 

And then we talk a lot more about this subject. And he’s very, he’s very apprehensive. He’s very like on the back foot the whole time, very defensive. And yeah, just the way he explained it to me, I said to him:

 

“You know, do you still have this same attitude? Like, do you still feel this way about God? Is that your relationship with God?”

 

And he said to me, he said:

 

“I wake up every morning, and the first thing I do every morning is I pray to God and I say, God, I am your slave. Let your will be done through me! I am your vessel. I am your slave on this earth!”

 

And I was like:

 

“You do that every morning?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Yep, that’s what I do.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Wow! That is fascinating!”

 

And he’s like:

 

“It is, isn’t it? And I know that might sound really intense, but it works. It works for me! And I’m so much happier. Life is so much easier this way. It’s just so much easier! Like, I don’t feel what I used to feel. And, look, I still have challenges, and I’m a grandfather now, and da, da, da, da. But life is just so much easier this way!”

 

Okay, [chuckling] what the fuck! Okay. Anyway, an hour goes by, we shake hands, and he goes:

 

“Nice to meet you, Tom. Blah, blah, blah.”

 

And then the second time I meet him, so I ticked the box again. I want to have another conversation. He says to me right at the end, he goes:

 

“Do you want to meet me again? Do you want to talk to me again?”

 

I said:

 

“Absolutely! I really enjoyed this conversation.”

 

“Are you sure?”

 

I said:

 

“Yeah, I really enjoyed this conversation. I really enjoyed it. I would like to meet you again.”

 

And he said:

 

“Okay, well, what about next week?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Maybe not next week. I need a bit more time to digest this conversation. But maybe give me two weeks.”

 

He said:

 

“Okay, two weeks, Same time, same day.”

 

I’m like:

 

“Excellent!”

 

So this is my only human contact. I’m in a concrete box for two weeks straight. And then I meet up with him again. He walks in and he’s nervous. He’s so nervous! And he says:

 

“Tom, I have to be honest with you. I Googled your name. I thought I recognised you, but I Googled your name, and it was really hard for me to come in today.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh! Why is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“Because, … There’s a lot of people in this prison, and they’ve really beautiful people that have done really horrible things. And I’ve never felt like this before where I felt selfish that I didn’t want to come in. But I prayed to God this morning, and I said God, I don’t want to talk to this man. I don’t like this man. I think this man is evil, and I don’t want to speak to him. What should I do? And what God told me was that’s why you have to go speak to him. Because he’s evil. Because he’s evil, you have to go speak to him. That’s why!”

 

I was like:

 

“Oh, okay, all right.”

 

And then I said to him:

 

“You ever spoken to a paedophile?”

 

I said:

 

“Have you ever felt that way about a paedophile?”

 

And he was like:

 

“No, no. There are some really beautiful people in this prison. Some really beautiful people in this prison.”

 

“Never felt that way about a paedophile? Okay, interesting! Well, luckily, you are God’s slave, and that God forced you to come in here today to speak to me!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“I want to show you something. I want to show you my God! I want to show you my God!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, you want to show me your God?”

 

“Are you ready? Are you ready for my god?”

 

It’s this weird, passive aggressive, feminine. He’s got tears in his eyes. And he’s like:

 

“Before I do, can I ask you a question? Why did you want to speak with me?”

 

[1:46:16]

 

And I said to him:

 

“Because I told you the truth last time. My grandmother was an Anglican. I’m an Anglo Saxon. I ticked the Anglo box, not the Catholic box. Simple as.”

 

And he was like:

 

“But me specifically, did you know I was the Anglican priest. Me, personally?”

 

And I was like, I think his name was [changed]. And I was like:

 

“Leslie, I don’t know who you are. I just know that you’re an Anglican priest.”

 

He goes:

 

“You don’t know about my past?”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I don’t know. What is your past?”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, I want to tell you a story, Tom. You know, I had to take a stand against, … I mean, there’s a lot of evil men in the world., …”

 

And he’s talking like a lesbian. He speaks like a lesbian, right? He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of, …”

 

Like a feminist. He’s like:

 

“There’s a lot of evil men in the world. And Donald Trump comes to mind, and Adolf Hitler comes to mind. And when I was younger, there was a man that came to power in Australia that reminds me of Donald Trump, and his name was John Howard. And when John Howard came to power, he had an immigration minister called Peter Dutton, who you might know, because he was running for prime minister recently. And they imprisoned people in concentration camps on, …”

 

I think it was like, Manus Island or something, one of these islands off the coast of Australia:

 

“And there were these people, these desperate, honest, loving, caring, they were God’s children, and they wanted to come to Australia, and they begged for our help and our safety. And they were refugees, …”

 

And he’s literally crying! He’s literally crying!:

 

“And we locked them and their children in concentration camps on these islands and treated them so horribly! And I had to make a stand, so I went and visited them!”

 

So he goes to the concentration camp and he’s like. [chuckling] He says:

 

“And I like painting. And I met this man, and he was a refugee, …”

 

And I think he was Iranian or Iraqi or something like that. I think Iraqi. And he goes:

 

“And I met this Iraqi man, and his name was Fadim, …”

 

Or some shit! And he goes:

 

“I said to him, you are so beautiful! You are such a beautiful man. Can I paint you? I want to paint you. Will you let me paint you?”

 

And then he said:

 

“Yes, I’ll let you paint me. And then I painted him.”

 

And it’s hot. It’s so weird! He’s holding a, he’s got like a, he’s got the, … Imagine this is the painting of the guy, but he’s got it like this, and he’s holding it on the table, and he’s holding it upside down. And he’s holding upside down on the table, and he’s like:

 

“I want to show you this. And the reason why I want to show you this is because when I was painting him, I looked into his eyes and he was crying. He had tears in his eyes as I was painting him. And I was painting him. And the whole time I was thinking about Jesus on the donkey going into Bethlehem as a refugee, needing safety. And I thought, this man is from that region. This man is from the same region, very similar region, near the Euphrates. And he’s a refugee as well., …”

 

You can predict the whole conversation, can’t you? Like, I’m drawing it out, but I’m drawing it out for effect. This was the tone this guy was taking with me.

 

“And I still remember. And I thought to myself, this is what Jesus would look like, and this is how Jesus would feel if he was here right now with us, seeing what John Howard, behaving in a fascist man manner, putting these innocent people in concentration camps! This is how Jesus would be looking at me. So I painted him. So I painted my God! This is my God, Thomas! This is my God!”

 

And then he shows me a painting of a brown man crying. And he’s like:

 

“This is my God! How do you feel?”

 

A picture of a brown man crying. And I was like:

 

“Fascinating! Fascinating! That’s your God?”

 

He’s like:

 

“I want you to have this. I want you to put this up in your cell.”

 

And I was like:

 

“No, no, I don’t want it. It’s your painting.”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, this is a copy of it. This isn’t the one I painted. This is a copy. I want you to have it. I want you to put this in your cell and I want you to look at my God! And I think that will really help you and I think that’s why I was sent here today to give you this painting.”

 

And I was like:

 

“It’s a decent painting. You’ve done a good job painting it, for sure. This is not my God! This is your God. This is not my God! I can’t put this in my cell. It’s just not my God! Not my God! There are many gods. This one’s not mine. This is your one!”

 

And [chuckling] that was the end of the conversation! And yeah, fuck, I’ve just had too much life experience at this stage! [chuckling]

 

[1:52:11]

 

And when I got out of jail, I’m gonna Google this church that this guy’s from. And it’s like gay flags and trans rights and refugees are welcome and all this shit!

 

And it’s like [chuckling] women pastors! These people, they’re sick! They make me sick! People in the chat saying, Jesus’ Italian. Man. A lot of, lot of Superchats to go through. Jeez. How much more do you want me to go, in a detail about that one? Oh, I don’t know what it is. It’s not dopamine, but it’s some sort of chemical. There’s some chemical in the brain. It’s just surreal! It’s like a surreal chemical. It’s not dopamine. It’s the surrealism of it. It’s the surrealism. Hyper, hyper, what do they call it? Hyper realism. How are these people real? They share this planet with us. What planet are they on?:

 

“I felt really bad for the magpies. That’s why I had to go back to the Church!”

 

Well, yeah, obviously you shouldn’t just like indiscriminately kill animals!

 

But what he was doing at 14 was what all 14 year old boys do, is they’re testing themselves. They’re seeing, can I do it? Can I do it? Can I put meat on the table? Can I put meat on the table?

 

And I said to him:

 

“Are you a vegetarian now?”

 

When he talked about the magpies, I said:

 

“Are you a vegetarian?”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, no, I’m not, but I make sure I thank God every time I have meat. And I thank God for what’s happened to the animal and pray for the animal.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yeah, that’s fair enough. That’s good. I respect that.”

 

I have a lot of respect for that. I think that’s important when you take life and you’re consuming that life. Trans. The transmutation of it. Transubstantiation. Yeah. Like you’re putting meat on the table and you shouldn’t indiscriminately kill, but you’re doing what all teenage boys do when they’re going through puberty is they’re seeing not just if they can do it, but they go over the top. You know what I mean? They go a little, you go a little bit over the top and then you dial it back in. You’re like:

 

“All right, that was unnecessary.”

 

But he’s gone, he’s dialled it back in so much that his God is a brown man crying. That he has to live with White people!:

 

“He has to come live with the White people! He has to! We have to let them in! We have to!”

 

This is what his God wants. So look, obviously if you’re a Christian and you’re watching this, you would be disgusted by that story, that this is the calibre of priests. This is not Patriarchy. This is not the original church. This is not anything like the Greeks or the Romans or the Hebrews or even the jews. This is like the jews don’t even behave this way. This is like sub-Aryan and sub, even sub-Hebrew behaviour. And like ancient Hebrew, if we’re going to call it that. But this is like a completely poisoned chalice and these people are church leaders.

 

And so, yeah, it’s been completely infiltrated by communists. This is the downward path. They’re cherry picking document a book that has a lot in it.

 

As I said, the Bible’s a million things! There’s a million words in it. There’s a lot going on in that book. You can cherry pick whatever you want to articulate something, but what you can’t lie about is the general progression of themes and the general moral structure that the Bible is putting forward.

 

Now, is there, in my opinion, contradictions of the moral structure? I think there are some things that, and I’ve discussed them, I won’t go into them today. But you’ve all heard me say what I think is contradictory in there, within the moral, within the framing of a lot of things. And in short, I don’t like the story of Jacob and Esau. I don’t like that story.

 

Well, I mean, I don’t like the character! I don’t like the individual. And I don’t like the moral of that story. I think it is either miswritten or it’s not correct, it’s not right, it’s not fair, or there’s missing data, something’s missing from it. In my opinion. Like that would be the only way I could describe it as a moral story. Anyway. But the Bible’s full of that, of this kind of fight of morality. And you can see the schism of morality. You can see the schism of an ethnicity or the schism of a people are schisming, which is I guess one of the main themes of the whole text.

 

But if we just come back a little bit and we don’t talk about the Bible and Christianity, we just talk about the theme of Patriarchy, which is beyond just Christianity. I think that’s one thing the pagans and Christians can both agree on, is that we need Patriarchy.

 

And I think the Christian view is that women are inherently prone to an evil influence, just as men are, but that it infects the women first. And you can kind of see that with how giving women the right to vote and the late Enlightenment values of total, absolute human equality led to the suffragettes and led to women voting and led to first wave, second wave, third wave feminism that has come out of that structure. And we can see the damage that that has done to society. Anyone that can’t is obviously an idiot! But we can see the damage that it’s done. And yet women are also capable of fixing the situation. That’s also interesting.

 

As I said before, when I started women, more women voted for Adolf Hitler than men!

 

[1:58:41]

 

 

So that is a very redeeming quality when you realise that. Well, hang on a minute. Why? How could that possibly be? How could that possibly be? And what that might give a little bit of Credence to is this idea that when there is a strong leader, when there is a return of masculinity and a return of Patriarchy, women are actually more inclined to notice it than men. Women are more intuitive to the cure than men are. They’re more sensitive to the disease, but they’re more sensitive to the cure as well.

 

So I had a thought that ran through my head yesterday or the day before, which was, if we don’t contain women or restrain women, who will? Who’s going to? Because what we can see by the decline of the last hundred years of civilisation is we have removed the barriers, all barriers, every barrier possible, and said:

 

“No. Men and women are exactly the same!”

 

And we have done this to the detriment of women. We have not improved their life, and more importantly, we have not improved civilisation, and we have not improved the fucking mission. And the mission isn’t to make women happy. I want to make that very clear. That’s not the mission. It’s not to make men happy either. You know what this guy’s talking about? It’s like he accepted God because he wanted to be happy. That’s what Nietzsche talks about. That’s crazy! Well, it’s not crazy, but it’s like, that’s not why you should accept God. That’s selfish! That’s not the mission. Morale is not your happiness. It’s your willingness to fight. You have to fight for a mission. You have to fight for a purpose, for meaning.

 

And I believe you have to fight for life itself. Life is an upward struggle. And my religion, my personal religion is what my interpretation of Hitler’s religion is, which is that it’s about struggle into victory. And that these things aren’t necessarily steady states or acts of being, but they’re acts of becoming. Struggle is an act of becoming into victory, which is also an act of becoming.

 

So it’s never ending. It never ends. It’s like beyond time because God has to be above time. God can’t be subject to time because then he’s not God. So God is above time. So therefore, struggle and victory have to be conceived as being principles above time. That it’s like infinite struggle for infinite victory. It’s just like a yeah, it’s like you got a hail victory and you got a hail struggle. You got a hell struggle to hail victory! You know, which is a bit. Yeah, a bit different to:

 

“I just wanted to be happy! I just saw all these people around me and they were happy. And I just wanted to be happy. I just wanted to be a good person because I was a bad person!”

 

You know what? Yeah. [chuckling] Very different sense of moral structure and moral framework. So yes, Patriarchy, restraint, it’s about building a world that is driving towards this goal. And the relationship between men and women in that world is one built off respect, not pandering.

 

And so the issue with our society at the moment at a just socio-economic level with 50, 60% divorce rate, with the family courts tearing families apart like all the societal diseases we’ve got, is about, what they all come down to regarding the bad relationships between men and women and is that women have on average more respect for the government and more respect for the system, for the justice system or for the police than they do for their own husband and their own father. That’s the issue!

 

So a system needs to be built by husbands and fathers that form a collective, that form an organisation that are all on the same page with how they’re managing their family. It’s up to them how they manage their family. But they’re all roughly on the same page as to how they manage their family. A nation is a collection of families. It’s not a bunch of gay men masturbating into each other’s assholes and adopting kids. That’s not a nation. That’s just craziness! A nation is a bunch of families. You know, the family is the building block. This is not a meaningless platitude. It is the truth! You cannot have a nation without families. Because a nation is an extension of the family.

 

And so therefore the leader of a nation has to be the extension of the leader of a family. And the leader of the family is the father or the grandfather or the great grandfather, if he’s still alive. Like that is the leader of the family.

 

And that’s how society has always worked. And it’s a sacred, ancient, basically unwritten rule. I mean, we don’t even need to write this down. This is a reality.

 

And anyone that disagrees with that reality is our enemy. Because they disagree with it, because they care more about something else than making our society, our civilisation, our blood, our spirit, our life force, move upwards. They care about something else. They care about some sort of momentary happiness or some sort of:

 

“I want to feel good. I want to get along with everyone.”

 

Like this is their God, this is their God!

 

And so those people shouldn’t be given the same rights as the Patriarchs, as the people that acknowledge that:

 

“Hang on a minute. We’ve tried that. What it leads to is like millions of Indians and Arabs and Africans coming into our country and just like raping and pillaging and destroying it economically, socially, and sometimes unfortunately, physically.”

 

And these consequences are obvious. And we’re going to structure society in a way that this doesn’t happen going forward. So yeah, it’s non-negotiable. I’ll go through the comments and wrap up the stream.

 

[2:05:06]

 

Where are we? Where are we? Celine’s got another question. Just something about I don’t like Christians. Cool. Three story Rory:

 

“G’day, Thomas. What do you think about starting a petition for Joel Davis similar to one for Brandon Koschel? Chances of their release are low, but this activism can rally support and drive attention.”

 

A petition? I don’t understand what a petition is. Yeah, I’m not in the petition business because it doesn’t work. It doesn’t do anything. There’s a petition to deport me to New Zealand with a hundred thousand signatures, and yet here I am in Melbourne, Australia.

 

So look, the way we get Joel out of prison is either he’s released because the Supreme Court has a sense of the law and will enforce the law and the law says that he should be released from prison. And the Supreme Court follow through with that because the magistrates certainly don’t uphold the law. They’re activists. They’re political activists that do what the politicians tell them to do. That’s the only way to get him out of prison. Or we wait for the infinity amount of time he’s got to be in prison.

 

But yeah, sorry, a petition is not going to do anything. It’ll help raise awareness and that’s really the purpose of petitions. But no, I’m not in that business:

 

“Thank you for your sacrifices and bravery. God bless!”

 

Yep, thank you. A lot of comments. A lot of comments. Fanny Schrute says:

 

“Jesus was Italian.”

 

I think that’s the way to go. Someone gives me $100 for the cause:

 

“No need for acknowledgment.”

 

Thanks, mate. Celine’s got another one. Something about KGV, Shakespearean old English language. Stone Mountain:

 

“What are your thoughts on infidelity in women versus infidelity in men? And are our highly successful Chad man with multiple baby mothers a greater good or bad for society?”

 

Oh, that actually brings me to what I was meant to talk about the manosphere and stuff and we just end up talking about Christianity. Yes. That actually brings me to the second half of the stream, and we’ve been going for like two and a half hours. It’s crazy! This is madness, guys!

 

Yes, yes. Look, let me get a glass of milk. Let me get a glass of milk. And I have all these thoughts that I’m gonna put down. Because there’s just been so much chatter about the manosphere and looks maxing and Louis Thoreau’s recent thing. And I made a little post. Obviously most of you have probably already read my post, just explaining, the TLDR [Too Long-Didn’t Read]. These people that are trying to embarrass the manosphere, which is quite easy, clearly. These people are not morally triumphant. These people are equally as bad, if not worse than the manosphere. And don’t get blindsided by this and fall into some trap where you’re going to take moral, what’s it called? Not legalisms, like lectures. Don’t take moral lectures from these freaks! These people are easily as bad, if not worse than the manosphere people. The manosphere people, a lot of them are not good people. I want to make it clear this next segment is not in defense of the manosphere. I’m not saying that. I’ll explain how you should accurately interpret why this phenomenon exists and how it needs to transmute into something much better. I’ll be back. I’ll just close this little thingy. Two minutes.

 

[2:11:12]

 

 

All right, I’m back. I’m not sure who, because there’s a couple wives here, but someone made these little steak mushroom pies. Homemade everything from scratch. And there was a little pot on the stove with like a mushroom sauce in it on top of that. And I just absolutely demolished these absolutely incredible, like 10 out of 10, homemade steak and mushroom pie! And I was dipping the mushroom pie in the mushroom sauce and the steak was like, just perfect! And I got myself a glass of Jersey milk. Raw, organic, biodynamic Jersey milk from my mate’s farm. His family’s got a hobby farm. They’ve got 12 Jersey cows. Incredible! Incredible! I feel like food like that is near medicinal. It’s that good for you. I feel alive!

 

People say we don’t have a culture. And it’s like, whatever these people have as a culture, I don’t care! [chuckling] Like, whatever they think culture is, I don’t care! Like, I’m actually happy with meat pies and footy. I think we got to make it better. We could do better footy and we could do better meat pies. But I am genuinely like a meat pie and footy nationalist. All my kids are going to play footy. All of them. All of them! I don’t care! What I hate about sportsball is what I hate about consumers. It’s the consumption of the fake cult that’s the problem. It’s the cult around football that are the issue. It’s not football. Playing the sport is great. I mean, depends on the football. I think AFL is probably one of the best sports in the world. But I’m biased. I’m Victorian. I didn’t play enough footy growing up. I think that’s why I’m short. [chuckling] People say:

 

“No, it’s the other way around.”

 

No, no, no! Just give me a minute, give me a minute. My dad’s English though, so I played a lot of soccer. I played high level soccer which I know a lot of I know in Europe you call that football, but yeah, we call it soccer in Australia. And footy is either rugby or AFL, depending on which state you’re in. I talked about this with Mason, I think. But anyway, this milk is so good! Are we back? Is the stream back up and running? Stone Mountain says:

 

“What are your thoughts on infidelity in women and infidelity men? And are highly successful Chad man with multiple baby mothers a greater good or bad for society?”

 

That’s what we’re going to get on. And I’ve got like, there’s like 200 and something comments underneath that. So that’s how far behind I am, guys. I don’t apologise.

 

[2:15:04]

 

So Louis Theroux is the same exact individual as that Anglican priest I was telling you a story about just then. He’s a passive-aggressive lesbian. Louis Theroux, he wasn’t raised by a man, he was raised by a single mom. Now there’s a lot of people that were raised by single moms that turn out as men. I’m not attacking men that have had to go through that unfortunate situation. I’ve got a lot of friends. Almost all my mates in the army interestingly were products of single moms. They didn’t have dads. Almost all of my friends in the army. Which is really interesting and that actually ties in with the Roman understanding of creating a full-time army, was that it was a brotherhood cult of men that didn’t have proper, they weren’t in a proper gens, so they didn’t have a cult of a family. They weren’t in a proper family Patriarchy, so they had to join an institution of Patriarchy. I think you got to do both.

 

Most men I know that turn out, every man I know that’s turned out well, that has been born of a single mom, has had really good male role models. They’ve joined the army or they’ve gotten into MMA or they’ve gone into footy or whatever it is. And they’ve got this like brotherhood. They’ve got this Patriarchy. They’ve got men, they’ve got unc [“uncle”], they’ve got uncs. They might not have dad, but they’ve got uncs. And you got to have uncs. Even if you’ve got a dad, you gotta have uncs. I actually didn’t have any uncs. Well, I had some soccer coaches and stuff, but it’s not quite the same.

 

And then when I joined the army, obviously I was telling you about some uncs. But I didn’t have uncs until I joined the army, basically. You got to have uncs. It’s a big part of young guys developing. Got to have uncs! And the system hates uncs! The system hates uncs! They absolutely hate uncs! This gynocracy, this feminised Kali Yuga, disgusting freak stuff. They hate uncs because they want you to have lesbian, passive-aggressive lesbians explaining to you how life is. And they’re trying to reprogram you from your dad. And if you don’t have a dad, then you’re double fucked!

 

And so that’s why they went after the manosphere, because the manosphere is basically a bunch of guys trying to be uncs. It’s a bunch of guys trying to make money off being an unc. And most of them are not good people. Some of them are the middle somewhere. They’re a bit Beyond Good and Evil. But most of them are pimps, unfortunately. And they feed off the worst energy of the Kali Yuga.

 

But in doing so, they expose it! So it’s a double edged sword. They attract the energy that they put out and vice versa. They go after these OnlyFans hoes and they, you know what I mean? They associate in those circles. Even if it’s from a juxtaposition, it doesn’t matter, you’re associating with it, so you’re going to attract that energy.

 

But Louis Theroux is a passive-aggressive lesbian. And the system is really intimidated by the return of Patriarchy. And what the manosphere represents is these little warlords. It represents these little Patriarchs building their little Patriarchies. And they’re an influencer. And young teenage boys and even older guys in their 20s are looking up to these people. They’re looking up to Andrew Tate, and they’re looking up to, I’ve never heard of who HS Tiki Toki is. I mean, it’s just ridiculous! [chuckling] But that’s obviously absurd!

 

But the same kind of demographic that are looking up to these guys are also looking up to us. I have young guys in their late teens almost every day come up to me and try and take a photo with me almost every day. Some days, five, six young guys will come up to me and they’ll say:

 

“You’re a legend, blah, blah, blah.”

 

Quuk And they tell me a story about what’s happening at their school, and they’ll say:

 

“Like they do a Welcome to Country every Monday morning, and everyone just kind of like, mumbles and they don’t boo, but we haven’t built up to that yet. But then when the Aussie anthem comes out, we all stamp our feet and chant it loud. And all the woke teachers are seething! You can see all the fat bitches seething! And we just smash out the national anthem! Every Monday morning we make a point of it!”

 

They didn’t say that. I said:

 

“You make a point of it?”

 

They say:

 

“Yeah, exactly!”

 

I’m like:

 

“Yeah, good!”

 

But these young guys, they’re looking for unc. Where’s unc? Because dad’s a pushover. Or maybe dad is not a pushover, but you still need uncs. And Louis Theroux is a very insecure dude. He’s really messed up because he didn’t have the opportunities that he should have. But he grew up in a world where you could still, if you’d got your foot in the door you could establish yourself, and if you were good at your job, you would be promoted. And that’s the world that he grew up in. He’s like an older millennial. Actually, he’s probably a Gen-Xer. He’s probably like a young Gen-Xer. He’s somewhere around the Millennial. You know what I mean? Like a Gen-Xer Millennial. And he did a little bit of work for, who’s that other lesbian? Michael Moore. He did a little bit of work for Michael Moore. And it’s that Left-wing agitating expose journalism. Now I’ve watched a few Michael Moore documentaries and I think he does a good job.

 

[2:21:05]

 

Same thing as I’ve watched a lot of Louis Theroux documentaries and he does a good job. Louis Theroux is almost more annoying than in some ways because his whole shtick is trying to get the person to be pissed off! Which again, that’s kind of how my brother behaved. And it was weird! No matter how much my dad told my brother like:

 

“Michael, you can’t talk to people like this. You’re gonna get punched in the head.”

 

And no matter how many times my brother got punched in the head, he still kept behaving this way.

 

Now I don’t think Louis Theroux has ever been punched in the head, but he behaves in a way and he talks to people in a manner where he relies on the passive-aggressive and gynocratic system to enforce his moral structure on society. Now he’s got a lot of idiots and midwits convinced because of the way they’ve done very clever editing. Like they’ll ask a question, whether it’s a silly question, or a good question. And then he kind of feeds off this pause moment the person’s pause paused and reflected on the question and they’re like:

 

“Ha! Gotcha!”

 

And then all the midwits that like Louis Theroux that are watching and they’re like:

 

“Gotcha!”

 

Now, I haven’t even watched this manosphere doco, I’ve just watched the shorts, but I’ve watched a lot of Louis Theroux doccos. So I know exactly his tricks, I know exactly what he does. And it’s a shtick, it’s a grift! And the grift is:

 

“I’m going to try to piss this person off. I’m going to try to make this person seem unreasonable.”

 

And he found a group of people that it was quite clear they couldn’t articulate their value systems. And in a lot of cases their value systems were inherently, not just broken, but misaligned and not very White and Aryan.

 

I’ve done lots of streams on monogamy and polygamy and I’ve talked about how polygamy is a weapon of war. Polygamy is a weapon of war! It’s a weapon. Polygamy is a demographic weapon. It’s a form of jihad. Polygamy is a form of jihad. And there are Christian groups that do polygamy as well the Mormons. And polygamy is not sustainable. It creates, … You want to talk about lack of social cohesion. What it creates is a society where it creates an incel society that check out! There’s a lot of layers to this. When you have polygamy, especially in a capitalist society, you’re now hyper selecting for genes that are capitalist pieces of shit!

 

So I’m not a communist, but I’m definitely not a capitalist. I’m the Third Position. All right? People that think the purpose in life is to make lots of money, and there’s nothing wrong with being good at making money. It’s good to be good at your trade, it’s good to make money, but it’s not, … The love of money is the root of evil! And that’s a fact! Your purpose in life isn’t to make lots of money. If it happens for you and you’ve got a utilitarian or industrial drive to do better, then there’s Aryan qualities in that, as long as you are fairly and honestly and you’re a community minded person, there’s nothing wrong with being rich.

 

I’m not anti-rich. And I want to make that very clear. I’ve never ever been anti-rich. I’ve never seen a rich person and been like:

 

“Why is he rich?”

 

Like the way Marxists feel like they’ve got a jealousy component to it. I’m not jealous of rich people, I just don’t like pieces of shit, and there’s a lot of people unfortunately that are rich because of really immoral means. And there is obviously huge wealth inequality. And it’s very unlikely, except in the cases of religious structures that you could have polygamy in this society that wouldn’t be entirely associated with wealth. It is not going to come down to good genes, it’s going to come down to wealth. And in our broken society, wealth is correlated with being immoral. Wealth is correlated with having bad genes. People with bad genes are doing really well in the society and good honest people are being punished because we’re controlled by these dishonest bad people that have created a structure and a framework to keep them in power and to keep them wealthy and to keep their competition down.

 

And the weakness of our fairness and our altruism is we’ve allowed this to happen. That’s our major weakness. And that’s because we’re living in the collapse of our aristocracy. We used to have an aristocracy, we don’t have an aristocracy. We need an aristocracy! We can’t survive without statesmen. We can’t survive without massive! Well, not massive! Massive is probably not the right word but concrete intergenerational power structures. Democracy is the last. Well, this is late stage democracy. And democracy in of itself is towards the end. And we’re in the end of the end. We’re in the worst form of democracy where everyone gets a vote. That’s not actually how democracy was intended to be.

 

So yeah, I’m not a fan of polygamy. I think that whatever goal you’re trying to achieve with polygamy can be achieved without it over more generations. And polygamy is a thinning of the male population, and we have to be very careful to not thin out the male population. There are a lot of dorks and there are a lot of losers, sure!

 

[2:27:01]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[3:41:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/28/2026 = 34)

DJTriumph
Supporter
18 hours ago
the James Mason podcast was great
11
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
FLmetalhead
12 hours ago
Where is it?
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
3
0

Jaymeo1
12 hours ago
Link ?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

eclipseNF
11 hours ago
Where is it?
1
0

baileyspunts
13 hours ago
Man i love when Sewell streams. White pill every time
11
0

LachlanMD
21 hours ago
L foids
6
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
19 hours ago
Nah. W foids
4
3

Jomaha22
20 hours ago
Every time I see that text “manosphere” I cringe. Where did this analogy came from? Ayn Rand male equivalent?
5
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
im guessing its the “every single time” crowd
2
0

christophawilkins
16 hours ago
hail
4
0

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
great to see another talk mate
3
0

squatmech
18 hours ago
There never anything wrong with the volume wtf is wrong with these people it’s like if you get kicked out of hundred bars but with low volume…
1
0

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
What’s the 5 hour stream where is it?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
2
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
eclipseNF
9 hours ago
Thanks a lot

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
whats gonna get too us 1st, terminator or mad max?
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Mad Max. These fuel shortages are serious & AI cannot become conscious – it is built from outside-in, life evolves and self-builds from inside-out.

imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
ive never heard of any abbos trying to claiming other abbo land that was taken in their tribal warfare, but the land whites took on the other hand will always be theirs??? and dna shows the have only been here for about 5000 years, coming from india and they were not the 1st people in australia, the originals were eaten by them.
1
0

TRUTH1488
11 hours ago
Where can I find that james mason podcast
1
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Hazelmango
Supporter
10 hours ago
https://ftjmedia.com/live/0/DaveGahary/ls/2444
1
0

Tax_Cow
VerifiedSupporter
5 hours ago
Our boomer parents have been hooked on the TV since childhood and they’ve been soaking up jewish propaganda for so long that they aren’t capable of independent thought. Despite whatever their friends and family say, what the TV says is the bottom line. Unwitting agents of our destruction, professing to be enlightened because they watch the talking heads on TV every night.
1
0

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
1 hour ago
Tom, im glad you still give Abos a chunk of land as their own country. African americans & native americans are similar. Thats the best way. I like wat you are doing but im softer on nons. I feel that at this point we may have to give all nons a chunk of western nations, as their own nation. Set cameras up and make documentaries on how they make a clean 1st world society to a 3rd world shithole. Juxtapose it with our first world living. This way we will document in 4D why we will never live with them again. We would play multiple weekly reality TV shows akin ‘Running Man’ & ‘Hunger Games’. This would change our culture. Then we will make museums to store these films and all the injustices we suffered with/from them. Especially the lil caps. Then maybe in the future we might decide to conquer them & retake the land, and put them where we want, maybe isntreal? Or put these brown masses in africa, or somewhere low on resources, since they cant mine them anyway. Tom, I also think 90%+ whyte is a good target. Because the good ones that help us have a reason to. But once we have control we can create policies to reduce their breeding over time: a white centred society; they will admire us or leave; we will be re-morale-ized; etc. If they dont want to accept it, they can always leave. Caramel island is an alternate choice for them too.
1
0

birdhouse456
15 hours ago
The problem with “where is the aboriginal land” is that their concept of it completely different to ours. We look at different metrics. They can’t just pick up and move their culture because it’s linked to place. If they don’t want to give that up they will be motivated to go to war regardless. Or, they’ll just be squeezed out and fade away, because once they are away from their territory the culture doesn’t function. Now we have a hybrid that succeeds at neither way. Maybe there can be agreement with some tribes but others will disappear completely. it’s similar to the clans of the Scottish Highlands. The culture survives, but it’s not what it was.

BossLurker
9 hours ago
Parasites and retards

BossLurker
9 hours ago
The whole “in the past they weren’t truly conservative they were only going off inertia” is actually an extremely good point

‹ Hide 1 reply
BossLurker
8 hours ago
Around 59:27

leibekohne
5 hours ago
Tom you have some criticism from USA NS bit-chute or odysee. The abos solution is good. I will give them a bare-bush land without any infrastructure, also they have to create own if needed financial system with own currency. This is about purity and recuperation of race thus Australia + has to be 100% white otherwise there will be no progress.Those idiots want to convert abos and save theirs lives but had no problem with murdering 35.000 white Boers woman and children. Cake destroyed Egypt Greek Roman empires by usury and by miscegenation. 1000 year of Romans were destroyed by 100 years of Christianity=Judaism 2.0= children blood drinking sacrificing cannibalism. Germany were destroyed in WW2 by another stupid and manipulated white men who should know better. White international unity.

CrazyRecluse
Supporter
56 minutes ago
Tom, I emotionally agree to boot out all leftists, or white antiwhites. But something for you to consider: Richard Spencer says that whites can build because we have all levels of people Elites, managerial class & working class. Dr Ed Dutton “white race functions like a bee hive”. So we might need to select the better ones and put in breeding policies to get them to their 15% balance. Because nearly all managerial class are leftists.

eclipseNF
14 hours ago
More and more blackpilled every single day
2
3

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
12 hours ago
life is struggle mate, learn to laugh in the face of these demons and keep the sprits of our ancestors lovingly in your heart. heil victory
7
0

trvkvlt
2 hours ago
Thomas Sewell is my rabbi
0
1

drshreddie
6 hours ago
you need a better background, the baby blue with the books isnt working. How about a more masculine color with a NSDAP banner? I know this seems trivial but perception is a big deal and your message is important.
0
4

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. We are live. It is the 19th of September 2024. We’re actually live on Twitter. Live on X for the first time.

 

Finally rigged it. I don’t know why I didn’t start streaming these streams on Twitter earlier because, yeah, it’s just like an obviously good platform. I saw some other nationalists that have been streaming up there and they got crazy numbers of views and they get a shitload of, … I remember when I did streams with Elijah Schaffer, he streamed it on X as well and it got heaps of views. We’re going to stream every show on Twitter now.

 

So you can watch the show on Twitter, but if you’re already accustomed to watching it on Rumble, stay on Rumble because the Rumble’s got a good live chat.

 

So you can stay on the live chat on Rumble. And also we’re on Odysee. But yeah, you can watch on Twitter. And the replay will be available. I think it automatically re-uploads as a replay. So we’ll see. Hopefully there’s no technical difficulties this time, but we’re into the show. Tom actually going to join us. He’s just turned his webcam off because he’s smashing down his late dinner and it’d be a little bit uncouth for him to finish it on stream.

 

So we’re going to start off with me and Blair. Blair, how you doing this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m good, man. I’m just trying to figure out how I change my settings on X to see quote, unquote, “sensitive content” because I just reshared this stream on X. Really excited to be streaming on X, by the way. First time we’ve done it, as Joel said, so should really soak up some new viewers, which is great. But how do I change my settings so I can see sensitive content? Like, does anyone have any instructions for me?

 

Joel Davis: I’ve got all these blocks on my account. Anything that goes on my account is classified as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it sucks!

 

But look, someone sent me an instruction on how to do that. We won’t get into it on the stream to divert the conversation that way, but someone tell me how to do that because I’m a little bit boomer tech with this stuff.

 

But yeah, I’m going well, really busy. I’m working as much as I can to make a bit of money for an endeavour of mine that’s coming up next month. But other than that, yeah, man, I’m just keeping an eye on current affairs.

 

Our mutual friend Thomas Sewell caught up with upcoming young Australian influencer today. So we might talk a little bit about that. I saw that you’ve been getting into a bit of back and forth with Fuentes, so that’ll be interesting to get your take on what’s happening there. But how you feeling Tom Sewell. What’s up?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m great. Just had a busy afternoon, but glad to be on the show. I just watched over that video. I thought the young guy did a good job. You can tell he’s very afraid of censorship. So we did, like, a half an hour interview, and he put up maybe four minutes of it, and the rest is just him at 7/11 being casually racist and funny.

 

So I have high hopes for the young man. It’s a shame that that generation’s kind of got a lot of brain rot. But you just got to roll with the punches.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll just show it here on the screen.

 

So this is the video. Tom just got interviewed by this guy, Max Caruso on YouTube. He just uploaded the video about an hour ago. And, yeah, he does these things where he goes and interviews gangsters and different people. And he decided to interview Tom.

 

So I haven’t actually seen it yet because he just uploaded it. But after Tom went and did the interview, he came to training, and it sounded like he had a good time. And it was a lot of fun. So should be some fun content.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s sad he’s so concerned about censorship, he left out a lot of the funny stuff.

 

So he would ask a question and I would just nonchalantly sort of answer it in a way that would just be normal in our scene. But for someone that’s very, very neutral politically and not exposed to our scene, he just found everything that I was saying hilarious in a kind of not in a nervous way, necessarily, but I think that generation are so divorced from just truth, just stern truth. They’re used to people, like, beating around the bush, and then they can’t even say faggot at school or like, there’s a lot of things that they don’t expect people to say.

 

So when I was explaining things the way that I sometimes do, I try to keep it as short and as succinct as possible because I knew his audience would have a short attention span. And he left out. I got him laughing quite a bit. Like, he left out a lot of the gold. Like he said to me at one point:

 

“I just always kind of I understand what you’re saying, but I grew up with this idea that Australia was for everyone.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“For everyone?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Yeah, you know, we’re multicultural. Just everyone can come here.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“If everyone is Australian, then what does Australian mean?”

 

And he just went really blank and kind of looked at the ground awkwardly.

 

And I was like:

 

“If every colour is red, then what colour is red?”

 

And he kind of just had, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a great analogy. Wow, that’s great!

 

[05:09]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he just had this, like, windows 95 kind of like loading screen or like Apple loading screen. It’s like, do, do, do! Yeah, he was just like, … And then even the cameraman started laughing. And it’s sad that he left stuff like that out because that, to me, is really funny, confronting logic that they’ve never been exposed to as young people. And, yeah, there was another time where he sort of asked the same question again in a different way to get a different answer.

 

And I was like:

 

“All right, I’ll say something even dumber because., …”

 

Well, not dumber, but I’ll say something that maybe would be more controversial or more able to get on YouTube than what I just said. Cause it makes too much sense.

 

And I said to him:

 

“So you’re saying Belay [sp] is just as Australian as me?”

 

And he just lost it! He was like:

 

“Did you just click at me?”

 

Like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

“Well, they can’t. They’re cannibals, aren’t they? From the Congo, like, Belay.”

 

And it was a good time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I can tell he wants to make something of himself, this guy. You know, he’s probably trying to protect his brand somewhat, as a lot of you know, upcoming influencers try to do.

 

Joel Davis: But hopefully, … I said, be very careful.

 

Thomas Sewell: I said, be very careful about getting a YouTube strike if you want to make it with what you’re doing. Be very careful with your interview with me. Like, don’t put too much up. Be very careful.

 

Blair Cottrell: As you know, Tom, like, YouTube strikes, they don’t have to give you strikes. They can just delete you! If he’s seen to be platforming someone who’s like a significant or considered some sort of threat to national security, that’s what Intelligence will say. YouTube will just take it, take his account down completely. So it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. Like, he’s in dangerous territory. I think he doesn’t understand how dangerous the territory is in censorship terms.

 

But, yeah, it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. And I’m glad it was fun. I’m going to watch it. I haven’t watched it yet. I watched it on mute while Joel and I were warming up just to get perspective of the vibe. And it looked like good fun.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’d be interesting to give it a watch after this, but in the meantime, we’ve got a stream to do. And there’s some subjects I really wanted to cover this evening. And the catalyst for it was., … Yeah, like, I got into a little bit of an argument with Nick Fuentes on Twitter, but it was an amicable argument. I just basically restated my criticism of the idea that we could form some kind of alliance politically with Muslims or other non-White factions that would be reliable in any way because they have completely different interests. Like, White people have specific existential interests, other groups have different interests. Maybe they converge on a particular issue.

 

But as the news cycle shifts, as things happen, eventually we find ourselves on opposite sides on another issue and the alliance breaks down. That’s why race needs to be the principle, because that provides consistency. There is always a pro-White position that is consistent on every issue, and we have blood loyalty to one another. We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race. We’re being attacked as a race, and the survival of our race is ultimately dependent upon our ability to reassert ourselves as a race. And no one else is going to come and save us but ourselves. And that’s just the reality. I see the political reality.

 

So I see any of this attempt at extending the political definition to include non-Whites, as just a waste of time, a waste of energy, fundamentally unstable. And it might seem like it’s a good idea temporarily, but it will always end up kind of falling apart in time. So I reiterated my point on that. And we had a little bit of a back and forth, particularly over the Israel-Palestine thing, because obviously, fuck Israel! Obviously we stand opposed to the jews and we want Israel cut off. I think we would actually want the jews expelled from all Western countries and Israel cut off completely.

 

But having said that, putting all of this political energy, and this isn’t something that I necessarily accused Fuentes of doing, but a lot of other people in the scene did this to excess, of putting way too much political energy, I think, into defending Palestine and focusing upon the pro-Palestine movement, which is led by brown people, brown immigrants in the West, in alliance with communists. Two enemy factions of us! Putting all of this energy into the pro-Palestine movement to the point that what are we getting out of that? They don’t have any sympathy for us. They don’t do anything for White people. In fact, communists and browns that make up this core coalition, they’re directly opposed to us and our direct political enemies.

 

So I’m not going to put much political energy into defending the pro-Palestine cause. I’m quite happy to criticise Israel, to attack Israel, to attack jewish influence. But from a pro-White perspective, from the perspective that White people shouldn’t be funding or supporting this foreign state, why do we go to war in Iraq for Israel’s interests? Obviously, it’s because of jewish infiltration and subversion of western governments. And not one White soldier should have given his life to defend Israel’s interests. I mean, that’s insane!

 

[10:24]

 

So obviously we agree on that point, but I think the criticism should be from a pro-White standpoint. We should criticise jews on the basis of how jewish power adversely affects White people, not how it adversely affects other groups. So that we remain entrenched in asserting our particular interests as a race and as a people. The retort was:

 

“Okay, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be reduced to that. All of these liberal and Islamic critics of Israel are still putting negative attention on the jews, and this is waking people up to the problem with the jews and so on.”

 

And I said:

 

“I don’t really think that’s the case.”

 

For me, there’s plenty of anti-Israel sentiment in the community. It’s a totally normal position. At least half of society is pro-Palestine, at least in most Western countries pro-Palestinian sentiment is actually higher than pro-Israel sentiment. There’s a lot of celebrities that are pro-Palestinian. The entire Left basically is pro-Palestinian in the rank and file. Obviously, the jews have captured the major centr-Left parties and keep them kind of in a more neutral position on the issue, leaning more towards the pro-Israel position.

 

But ultimately, the average Leftist is pretty anti-Israel. So does that mean that they’re anti-jewish? No, because they criticise Israel from a racial egalitarian perspective. The perspective that:

 

“The problem with Israel is that it’s a settler colonial, western White supremacist state.”

 

And they use basically the same criticism of Israel that they used to criticise the White settlement of Australia or the White settlement of the United States or Canada or whatever, and to de-legitimize that.

 

And so I don’t want to play into that framework. Because as a White Australian, that directly undermines me as well! I mean, I’m against Israel because it’s jewish! Not because it’s settler, colonialist or because it’s supremacist or any of these other things.

 

So anyway, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, if you had to pick a side, what side would it be?

 

Joel Davis: I would pick Palestine, because fuck jews! But I don’t have to pick a side necessarily. Like, I picked the side of the Whiteman, because I’m White. I pick my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Let me be clear. Let me be clear. Like, if Israel just incinerates a million Palestinians with incendiary bombs tonight, I don’t care!

 

And I also don’t care if, what are they, Hamas and Hezbollah? I don’t care if they gas a million jews tomorrow. I don’t care! I’m an Australian racist. I don’t care! My only concern would be, okay, how are we going to develop, build up and defend our national existence against these psychopaths killing each other over there? That’s what concerns me. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah. It makes sense to only be concerned with your own people, as opposed to worried about a foreign conflict. The only reason it’s our problem is because the jews are in our country, making it our problem through infiltrating our government and sending our resources, and most particularly American resources, to the aid of Israel and getting us involved in their conflict.

 

And then also, then we get the Palestinian immigrants brought into our countries as well, and that becomes other Islamic immigrants in general.

 

And so then we’ve got a pro-Palestine movement and a pro-zionist movement clashing in Australian politics and in all Western political dynamics, when it shouldn’t be our fucking problem! There shouldn’t be any jews or Palestinians or Muslims in any of our countries! And it should just be some weird foreign conflict that you read about on like, page 30 of the newspaper or something. It shouldn’t be something that we have to care about.

 

So anyway, that was the argument. So then a lot of people kept Superchatting, I think Nick’s show this week, asking him about me. And there was a response that he gave. I thought we could watch it and react to it. Not because it’s a big deal, the personal attack, but more because he then attacked street activism. He attacked basically our organisation and basically said:

 

“Oh, what’s the point of marching in the street in black? And so on?”

 

And so I thought it would be good to respond to it, to kind of explain, what our actual philosophy is behind doing it. Because this is something that is important, I think, to reiterate. Like, obviously, it’s a major part of what we do. So we’re going to explain why we do it.

 

But anyway, I’ll play the clip. I got the clip here. I’ll play the clip and we’ll analyze it’s actually a nine minute clip. I don’t know if I want to play the whole thing, it would take ages.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll do my best to pay attention.

 

Joel Davis: Sorry?

 

Thomas Sewell: The most important part is the last section, so maybe play the start and play the end.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll play the final clip.

 

Superchat: Skip sent $10. Could you elaborate on your thoughts about Joel Davis? The wignat circles he’s now a part of seem to always criticise you, which is disappointing. Always saw him as a potential Australian version of you. Would you be down to debate him in Twitter space?

 

Nick Fuentes: Well, the truth is, it’s kind of irrelevant, because he lives in Australia.

 

So I just don’t really care that much about, … Look, what does Australia have to do with us? That guy’s not American, so what does he have to do with us?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, then he proceeds to talk about me for nine minutes, so it must have something to do with you.

 

But anyway, I’ll try and skip to the point at which he talks about street activism.

 

[15:55]

 

Nick Fuentes: We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. [word unclear] reform. I don’t know what the model is there. Like lowbrow, … I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to. And it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind who he’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know. So are you really committed? Are you really serious about your core convictions if you’re changing them all the time?

 

Joel Davis: So, okay, so this part, he kind of criticised me, saying that I flip flopped on Christianity.

 

I started out online as kind of more of an intellectual, doing intellectual content, like theory cell content. I wasn’t doing activism then.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t picture that! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I wasn’t doing activism then, but basically I started out doing that kind of content. But at that time, my worldview wasn’t a million miles away from where it is now. I was a kind of Nietzschean, imperialist, racialist at that time. And that kind of my guiding kind of philosophy.

 

Then I went through a phase of trying to give Christianity a chance. I was raised a Christian. I turned away from the faith in my teens, and I tried to give it a chance again as an adult. And I ended up giving Catholicism a chance. I was raised a Protestant, and I was kind of I couldn’t go back to that. So I thought maybe I had the wrong brand. Maybe if I go back to the original brand, if I go back to Coke rather than Pepsi, it might taste better.

 

And I gave it a proper chance. I really did. That was a sincere thing. I don’t really see how that indicates that I lack conviction, to give a religion a chance, then ultimately, I just don’t. I lost my. I don’t have faith in the Church. I don’t think the Church is a legitimate institution.

 

But this whole time, I was a White nationalist. I never was nothing racially focused. I was never not pro-White. I’ve been pretty consistent in that core principle.

 

So the time in which I was a Catholic, I was a White nationalist, I was a Holocaust revisionist or denier, whatever you want to call it. You know, I talked about World War Two. I talked about the Nazis in positive terms. I defended Hitler. So it isn’t like this is like a million miles away from [chuckling] what I was doing before. I just basically had a religious phase. But he’s kind of defining that as flip flopping, like saying that what I’m doing now, I don’t have conviction.

 

I decided to get involved in activism. I surveyed the Australian scene. This is the only project that I thought was interesting and that was going anywhere in a positive way. So I decided to embrace this particular project. It aligned with my convictions and with my personality.

 

So that’s why I’m doing what I’m doing. Apparently, that’s flip flopping. Anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. It seems like a pretty standard process of development. It’s not really flip flopping. Yeah, but that’s just my take.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, maybe Hitler was right when Hitler said that you shouldn’t get involved in politics until you’re 30, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t say that! You’re not even 30 yet. Right?

 

So you’re still, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Maybe he was correct about that. Maybe I should have, like, finished, … Because now I’m kind of in my. I think I’ve finished my kind of maturing. I’ve kind of arrived. And maybe I should have waited.

 

But at the same time, I don’t really regret my previous involvements, because, as I said, it’s not like I haven’t been pro-White or, basically agitating for the same things the whole time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Tom and I got started early too. We got started early. And I don’t think either of us regret it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And you guys got started in a position that in now as well. Like, you tried a project. It wasn’t exactly the right formula. Like, you had some success, but it wasn’t exactly the right formula. Went back to the drawing board, reassessed. You have to learn on the job! And I feel like, similar to me. I tried some things out earnestly and then went back to the drawing board and revised it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I actually had conversation with Jim Salem, who at the time was called the “grandfather of Australian White nationalism”. When I was 21 and I was first getting involved in public activism, and I went up to “The Bunker”, as they call it, in Sydney in Tempe, and I said to him that quote, I said:

 

“You know, Hitler described that a man wasn’t politically mature until 30. And should I sort of just keep observing and keep an eye on things and keep developing myself and then maybe emerge as a political commentator, or a political leader, or a political activist at 30?”

 

And he said:

 

“No, no, there’s a lot that I disagree with Hitler on. That’s ridiculous! Alexander the Great defeated the Persians when he was 21 years old!”

 

At one of the battles. Can’t remember the battle, but he mentioned the battle specifically.

 

And, I mean, that is slightly different in the sense that he was born the son of a king. So that kind of helps get your political career up and running at 21! But it was a fair point. It was a fair point. I think he said something like, he’d conquered, like, a third of the known world by 28.

 

And so, yeah, I think Joel’s comments are fair. I think Nick’s comments on this, especially, are unfair. This idea, I can’t consider Joel someone that’s flip flopped on any of these issues. That’s the thing about being a political commentator, like Nick or like Joel or like ourselves, we make a thousand takes over the course of two years or three years.

 

So you can selectively pick, you know, anything and put them in distinction to each other or play them at the same time as each other. And it can appear that someone’s flip flopped on their views. And that’s not true. That’s not consistent with what Joel’s development has been like. And anyone to try to go back to their religious roots and explore Catholicism and then say:

 

“Well, that’s not for me.”

 

You know, that’s fine and noble. And obviously, Nick is personally affected by that. Nick’s a Catholic, isn’t he? So he would see that as some sort of apostasy. So that’s a personal dig. Like, he feels that’s an attack on his faith, that’s an attack on his convictions.

 

And then the other comments, the what’s it called? Not homophobic. What is it? The homoeroticism or whatever that he’s trying to bring up is just more of a projection of his own psyche. He’s the one with the gay accusations.

 

[22:36]

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh! Oh!

 

Thomas Sewell: This is the truth! Like when there’s been multiple occasions where his tabs have been open in the background and he said that he’s been hacked. Everyone’s defended him and protected him, but this is the stuff that’s been smeared against him and his associations with Catboy Cammy, who, like, would suck dildos on livestream. And he was friends with this guy and he did sleepovers with Catboy Cammie. That’s fucking weird! So he’s got some dubious associations, and he’s made many dubious comments.

 

And then to be involved in a nationalist organisation that has established leadership, that has established figureheads, it’s such a strange take that Nick has that to join an organisation must mean that you’re homosexually attracted to the leader. Is that why Nick isn’t involved in an organisation? Because he would have he would have to love big daddy Trump to join the Republican Party, or he’s got some strange, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe there’s no American. Maybe no American organize leaders are hot enough for Nick? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. Maybe.

 

But, yeah, it’s very immature. And he shouldn’t be punching Right. He is to the Left of us. He shouldn’t be punching Right.

 

But anyway, I’ll let you continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t have a problem with him expressing criticism of my views on whatever subject.

 

But, I mean, I’ve always been a friend to Nick. I’ve defended him from some people that I think have given him unfair criticism and personal attacks many times in the past, because I’m a pretty fair and reasonable person.

 

So it’s kind of weird to be like, yeah, I don’t think anyone really thinks I’m a faggot. You know, that’s not really a problem that I have to deal with. So it’s kind of weird for him to go there, but anyway.

 

Nick Fuentes: You bounce right out of it. And now you’re a NatSoc, and it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind, who’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know.

And the whole thing’s just kind of like, it’s too, like, lowbrow. Like, I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to have political Reform because a bunch of meatheads dress in all black and yell the n-word, throwing up Nazi salutes. Like, I don’t think that’s ever actually going to lead to political reform.

 

Joel Davis: By the way, this idea that I don’t think we’ve ever, like, yelled the n-word in at a public rally because there isn’t any black people really, in Australia to speak of I mean, there’s a few, but it’s not that relevant. So I don’t even know what he’s talking about there.

 

I mean, yeah, we do pretty, like hardcore rallies that can be kind of aggressive and militant, but, yeah, and even if we did yell, the n-word, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Political upheaval is a collection of activities that all sort of have that collaborative effect. It’s not like yeah, a bunch of guys protesting isn’t the only reason political change happens, but it might be integral in some way, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, the reason why we go into the street is, there’s multiple reasons. But one reason is because it provokes a reaction from the media, from the political class. I mean, the last few times that we’ve done rallies.

 

So the last rally that we did, we had the “Fuck Off! We’re Full!” rally where we confronted the refugee encampment. We forced Dvir Abramovich to go onto the news and a bunch of politicians to go into the news and argue about it. And Dvir Abramovich, by the way, is the Australian Jonathan Greenblatt, basically for the American audience. Like, he’s the jew that runs our version of the ADL [Anti-Defamation League].

 

He had to go on the news and explain “Great Replacement Theory” to the Australian people. And that, like that’s what we’re motivated by. We think that, like, White people are being replaced and this crazy conspiracy theory, and that’s what we’re there for.

 

And so that was brilliant! And the clips from that rally, by my count, of everything that I saw, accumulated at least 5 million views online on TikTok, on Twitter.

 

And the rally we did before that, where we, the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally that also got millions and millions of views online. It went all over the media sthings we have done in Sydney and Melbourne and so on, where the prime minister has had to come out into the media and condemn us or the premier of various states, like top level politicians, leaders from the jewish community and so on. So we provoke a reaction, to then get the Australian people to become aware of us. And we’ve become somewhat of a brand in Australian politics. So there’s a meta-political aspect to that.

 

But at the same time, there is also a recruitment aspect. Like we are showing ourselves to the people to say:

 

“Hey, come and join us!”

 

And every time we do a rally, we get a spike in recruits. Ultimately, we don’t have anywhere near enough people. But you’ve got to start somewhere.

 

Our idea is, well, if we keep doing this and we keep recruiting, in a few years time there’s going to be thousands of us. In a few more years time, maybe tens of thousands, and then it has a completely different connotation. Now we are literally mobilising seriously large quantities of White men in every city in Australia in a very prominent and powerful way that then becomes very interesting politically. But you have to start somewhere.

 

[28:17]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s applying pressure and it’s forcing the establishment to react to what you’re doing, rather than you always having to react to what the establishment is doing. Right. So it puts you in a powerful position. And sure, there’s consequences, but that’s the fun of it, [chuckling] in my opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s also about a kind of dramatisation. So it’s about showing that there’s one thing to have ideas and to promote ideas, but it’s another thing to go and stand in the street in a militant way in representation of those ideas. Because what that does is it shows that there is now an actor to support. There is a group, there is a movement, there is a representation of those ideas in a concrete formation of men. And, yeah, you could say:

 

“Well, it’s only 20 guys, 50 guys, 100 guys. Is that such a big deal?”

 

As I said, we’ve got to start somewhere. But we managed to get the prime minister of the country to talk about it, the top jews in the country to freak out about it all over the mainstream media and get millions of people to watch clips of it on the Internet. Many of the comments of which are massively supportive, by the way. You know, we’re creating a, we’re doing a performance art, basically. It’s a performance art with an audience of millions that gets a reaction out of the entire political elite of our country that has thousands and thousands, if not tens of thousands of people, sometimes even more, showing their support to us online.

 

So that’s a powerful act. There’s something there that you have to acknowledge in objective metrics.

 

Additionally, again, it’s a beginning point. We believe that the only way in which we can take on the system is ultimately to get White men organised in large quantities, explicitly around their race. And you could do that by basically getting no media attention and having like no public presence whatsoever! And you could see how many men you recruit and you could see how far you get and how much influence you have, or you could go and take on all the negative aspects of that, which is pressure from the feds, pressure from the state, pressure from the media.

 

But at the same time, you’re there, you’re in front of the people, you’re providing a concrete option. We believe that if we grow to a certain size, that hundreds of thousands of people that already sympathize with us in the Australian community, that so many of them will come and join our ranks once we get to a certain size, because they will see that:

 

“Wow! This is actually going somewhere. This is a movement I can believe in!”

 

It’s really hard to get people to believe in something when it’s a small amount of people or when it’s just an idea.

 

But when you start to show there’s thousands of men that have this idea that are going to stand together, united in this particular place at this particular time, then all of a sudden it becomes something to actually believe in. And you’re believing now in a people, in a group of people, as opposed to just a concept. Because there’s millions of Australians that the concepts of White nationalism will appeal to, but they’ve got no concrete people to go and support. They’ve got no concrete leadership to believe in, to galvanise around that idea. They just simply go:

 

“Oh, yeah, it sucks that immigration is happening and it sucks what’s happening to White people, but what am I going to do about it?”

 

We’re creating something for them to actually concretely believe in and to support.

 

But anyway, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you do, before you click play, we’ve got well over one and a half thousand live viewers, almost approaching 2,000 actually on X, which is awesome for our first ever X stream!

 

Joel Davis: Not sure if that’s live viewers. I think the way that Twitter counts views is just anyone who views it just becomes a view. I don’t think they’re all necessarily viewing it all at the same time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, well, it’s still a great amount of viewership and probably more than we get on Rumble. So just wanted to throw out some appreciation to everybody who is tuning in active in the live chat. That’s awesome! Thanks, guys.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s good. I think it will expand the audience. I mean, there’s still a lot of people watching a Rumble and Odysee, as usual. So, yeah, why not add the extra platform?

 

But, yeah, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

[32:37]

 

Nick Fuentes: I don’t know what the model is there. I don’t know what the strategy is there. But he went from kind of like, where we were, which is be presentable, be nationalistic, et cetera, to like, now he’s dressing in all black with a bunch of thugs, throwing up Hitler salutes, screaming the n-word, and not in like a fun, … You know, sometimes I do that in, like a half joking way. It’s edgy! It’s like edge lord humour. We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. And screaming about the “in-word this” and “get the fuck out!” Like, I’m sorry, I don’t know who that’s supposed to convince. Who is that supposed to win over other than other extreme young men?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re trying to win over other extreme young men! We’re trying to recruit them. [chuckling] That’s kind of the idea.

 

We present ourselves in a militant way because we want to recruit young White men with a militant attitude. We want to recruit tough young men that are willing to make sacrifices, that are willing to take risks, because we’re trying to build a core of revolutionaries. Those are the kinds of people that are revolutionaries.

 

And a lot of people in the public do like us and sympathize with us, but we know that they’re not going to come and join us because joining us is kind of intimidating. It’s scary, it’s commitment.

 

So we have a lot of passive supporters in the community that I think are glad to see militant young White men standing up for them. And they’ll be much happier to see us when there’s a thousand, and they’ll be much, way more happy to see us when there’s 10,000. The bigger we get, the more they’ll love us.

 

But we are trying to appeal to the men that are going to come and be part of that first thousand and then be part of that first 10,000. And those people, yeah, they’re going to have, like, they’re not going to be your average normie. They’re going to be people that are, have a so-called “extreme personality”, I guess, in some way, shape or form. We need people that are willing to become revolutionaries, that’s the only way we’re going to get there.

 

So, yes, the way we dress in black and we look kind of staunch and intimidating and give off a militant aura, because we’re trying to attract those people.

 

And also we’re trying to show that we’re serious, that we mean business. We don’t want fat nerds! We don’t want losers! We don’t want people that are soft. We don’t want people that are compromising. We want people that want to come and embrace an uncompromising, revolutionary message.

 

So that’s the logic. I don’t know if Tom wants to comment on that or if we should just keep watching.

 

Thomas Sewell: What he’s most upset about, in my opinion, in this segment, which I think a lot of people in our wider movement, I mean, this kind of rhetoric reminds me of Thuletide, for example. There’s a lot of people in the wider movement that are really upset with how we’re going about our activism and how we’re going about our optics.

 

And the main complaint I’ve heard, which he hasn’t said the words exactly, but they say it like this usually:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

That’s usually how they say it:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

I’ve heard this from all sorts of Liberal Party circles, you know, people that are quite sympathetic to us, you know, conservatives, conservative boomers.

 

And then:

 

“They don’t understand. They just don’t get it. You’re dressing up like the enemy. Why are you dressing up like the enemy? Why are you making yourself out to be like the enemy? !”

 

Just can’t conceive it.

 

And the reason why they can’t conceive it is because they’re collaborating with the enemy. They don’t participate strictly in the distinction. Nick Fuentes and his strategy and all the other Entriest type strategies, they want to be part of the system. They’ll wear a suit and a tie. They’ll pretend to be a lawyer, or they’ll pretend to be part of the political class, the Liberal political class. They’re larping as the people in power to try to fool the public into thinking that:

 

“We’re the same as the people in power, just with a little bit more common sense. And that’s how we’re going to get legitimacy.”

 

And it’s foolish! Because they’re never going to get legitimacy because they’re not puppets! The only people that have legitimacy within the Liberal order are put there by the men behind the curtain. And they’re never going to put someone like Nick Fuentes there.

 

So the Entriest policy, although it can make some initial progress and it can certainly create some compromised halfway positions towards where we want to go, it can never go all the way that we need to go! And he exposes himself as not even believing in wanting to go all the way. And he’s compromising himself because of this. He says something like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know much about Australia, but good luck to them! They’re never going to make Australia White!”

 

It’s like, we are going to make Australia White. That’s a fact. We are. It’s an absolute, undeniable, 100% fact! We have the numbers, we have the people. We’re not going to be swamped by billions of nons. That’s just not going to happen, because it’s one or the other. And we’re the last stand of the antipodean in the south. We’re going to make that stand and we’re going to be successful in that stand. And we have the faith. We have the belief in that.

 

So, yeah, we are dressing up as the enemy. We are. And that’s on purpose. It’s to create contrast, it’s to create distinction. And in time, right now, people aren’t angry enough. They should be much more angry than they are, especially with what’s going on in Germany and what’s going on in England. But even in America and Australia, it’s the same nonsense! It’s the same crap going on. You know, it’s police knocking on people’s doors for having the wrong political opinions.

 

And what’s going to happen over time is, and it’s already happening in real time, is people are losing faith in the establishment! They’re losing faith in the system and its institutions. And they’re going from losing faith in this system and its institutions into feeling like the system and its institutions are the enemy!

 

And then the enemy, or the system, is stupid enough to point out at 20 dudes in black block and say:

 

“That’s the enemy. That’s the enemy. These people are the enemy. They’re the enemy within. They’re the problem. Look at these evil Nazis! They’re the number one enemy. They’re the most toxic form of politics. They’re the most horrible, evil enemy to ever exist! These 20 men, or these 30 men, or these 50, or these 70!”

 

Or wherever it goes from there, and they’re stupid enough to do that. And what they fail to realise is that the average Australian is starting to hate the government! The average Australian is really starting to feel like the government is their enemy.

 

And when the government points out that we are the legitimate, full, 100% enemy of the system, well, now the people know where to look for:

 

“So, wait, if the government is my enemy, and the government is saying these people are the enemy? Well, maybe I identify with these people!”

 

And that is why we’re dressing up as the enemy, because we are the enemy of the people that want to destroy the White race. That’s our enemy and we’re their enemy. It’s that clear!

 

[40:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s well said.

 

And you mentioned there, Australia. And Nick is giving a perspective as an outsider from America. He’s not really savvy with what’s happening in Australian social, political life. Right. What he probably doesn’t understand is Australians have a certain disdain for careerist commentary. Like, they want to see action. They want to see someone ruffling the feathers, someone sort of pushing boundaries. And Australians really value an underdog as well. You know, we have that kind of culture down here. And are you saying, Tom, that maybe Fuentes is only really interested in remaining a careerist political commentator who wants to remain within the boundaries of the existing system, that maybe he’s trying to avoid that kind of more revolutionary, radical perspective and that’s why he’s kind of not really into the activism? Is that what you’re saying?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! I think that there’s two main types of far-Right people, if you want to describe them as that there are revolutionaries and there are reformers.

 

And I think he’s made it very clear that he’s a reformer. He wants reform. He wants Trump to take off the tie and crack the whip. He wants Trump to get the job done, build the wall, deport some of the Mexicans, or a couple million of them. But he doesn’t want a complete revolution. He doesn’t want a complete change in the entire system:

 

“The system is relatively good. There’s just a bit too many jews in power, and we can just make these kind of meantime reforms and go back to 1990.”

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing, he says that he does want a revolution. Like when he talked, like, on this same stream, I watched a little bit of it, and he said some really good things earlier in the stream about how he called himself a White supremacist. He said:

 

“He doesn’t care what brown people have to say about White genocide, that our race is being genocided and we’re going to be angry about it and we’re going to do something about it and we’ll let when we’ve gone too far. But we’re nowhere near going too far at this point.”

 

And a lot of good rhetoric.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s interesting because according to him we’re going too far. So he’s gonna let us, …

 

Joel Davis: What he’s having an issue with is the street activism.

 

But it’s like, that’s the thing. It’s like you want to have a politics with revolutionary outcomes, but then you want to go about it like a conservative, like you want to go about it where you wear the suit and the tie and let’s infiltrate the system and let’s change hearts and minds and like you’re not going to get revolutionary outcomes from conservative strategies.

 

Now when we look at, when we take a survey of the land and we look at the university educated, you know, upper middle class types, people who get law degrees, people who work in law enforcement, people who work in politics, these are the hardest people to get to take on a revolutionary agenda because they have the most to lose from throwing their lot in with any kind of radical movement. Because their entire livelihood, their entire career could be crumbled in one instant through association to anyone who is too radical being made public.

 

So we looked at that and we said:

 

“Okay, trying to build on that foundation is going to be a house built on sand.”

 

Because all of these people are basically being selected into all of these positions through their capacity for risk avoidance. And their entire livelihoods are going to be built around that foundation.

 

[44:01]

 

So then we go and look at, okay, well then we’ve got this demographic of White working class tradesmen, skilled labourers and so on. Guys who own their own businesses, guys who work in small businesses, guys that are masculine, guys that are into fitness, guys that have a militant attitude, they have an aggression that are generally the most racist demographic in Australian society, and the most free! Because they don’t work in industries where their livelihoods could necessarily be destroyed by association to a radical political movement. And we go:

 

“Well, we could recruit from that demographic of disaffected young men who are looking at society and saying, ‘It’s going to cost me a million dollars to buy a house in an average suburb. I want to get married, I want to have kids, I want my kids to go to good schools, I want to be able to live in a decent home. And now I’m basically going to be mortgaged up to the shithouse for the rest of my life, enslaved to jews to live in a shitty suburb surrounded by Indians, send my kids to a school where the jews are going to teach them to become trannies. This is fucking unacceptable! This is fucking unacceptable! I’m going to do something about it. I’m going to go and join these boys’!”

 

There are hundreds of thousands if not millions of young White men in that demographic who are going to love our message and who already do love our message! We could build a massive, massive movement of young men that will have money, that will be able to put their bodies in the street and extract a lot of strength from the people. And this is similar to if you read Mein Kampf. When Hitler kind of looked at the conservative movement of his day and the middle class and the petty bourgeois class of his day, he analyzed them and said:

 

“You know what? It’s going to be difficult for us to draw much strength from these people because they’re not doing so bad within the system. The system is offering them kind of positions but at the same time their mentality is fundamentally reformist. Their mentality is fundamentally servile to the establishment. We’re going to have to go and draw our strength from the class below them, and we’re going to have to appeal to them and build them into a large movement and then through strength in numbers then impose ourselves upon the political system with a more revolutionary kind of politics than what the conservacucks are going to be offering.”

 

Which is all conservatism is a compromise with the enemy. So we are trying to reach into the revolutionary demographic in Australian society and build upon that foundation. And yeah, they might be a little bit more rough around the edges. Yeah they might not have as refined sensibilities and so on, but they are ultimately going to be providing the raw manpower and the raw resources to actually put together a proper White nationalist political movement.

 

And then once we have a White nationalist political movement of a sufficient size, then we will have the ability to go and get those higher quality types, the people with the law degrees, the guys that are working in politics, the guys that are of that higher echelon of society and say:

 

“Hey, we’ve already got an established party here, we’ve got an established organisation, we’ve got money, we’ve got chapters in every single town in every major city. We’ve got guys everywhere. We’ve got resources. We can fund you, we can support you. Come and join us. It doesn’t matter if they know that you’re a Nazi because we can fucking support you! The movement can support you don’t need the system anymore to operate.”

 

And then we have a chance at actually winning. Because right now our enemies control the money. Our enemies control all the positions of influence. And everyone that’s going in there trying to infiltrate the system has to play by the rules of the enemy. And so they’re all totally ineffective!

 

I know plenty of guys that have infiltrated that are staffers in all of these political parties across the Australian Right. Guys that have branch stacked and become branch presidents within the Liberal Party, which is our biggest conservative Party, guys that have been staffers for major Right-wing politicians and so on. Whenever I talk to them about what’s going on inside the party and they give me the inside baseball, they tell me about what’s happening. And their role in what’s happening is zero! They just have to kind of go with the flow. They don’t actually have any agency. They’re in there. They’re talking to the movers and shakers. They’re talking to the leaders of the Australian conservative movement.

 

But ultimately they’re having basically zero effect in there! And they’ve been in there the whole time. White nationalists have been infiltrating the Australian conservative movement for decades and getting themselves in there.

 

And ultimately they have been able to do nothing to affect the kind of winds of change. And that’s because the jews and the property developers and the business lobby and all of these powerful interests that control the conservative movement are the ones that have the money! They’re the ones that are ultimately calling the shots.

 

So until we are able to raise our own resources from an alternative base, from a base that comes from the people, from the White Australian people, rather than coming top down from these bourgeois elites that don’t give a fuck about their country or that only care about their economic interests or these jews that have their own agenda or whatever, we’re not going to get anywhere. We’re not going to fucking get anywhere because they’re our fucking enemies! They’re our political enemies. They have no interest in struggling or supporting anyone who wants to struggle on behalf of securing a future for White Australian people. White Australian families, White Australian children. And that’s all we care about! That’s the only reason we are involved in this shit!

 

[49:28]

 

So we have no choice but to go and build from basically square one. I’ve surveyed the whole Australian political system. There’s no fucking entry points! We have to go basically from scratch. And it’s kind of crude. We have to basically dress in black and walk in the streets. All the guys are in balaclavas because only like 15 of us are even willing to show our face. We’re trying to conceal them from getting doxxed, which we have done relatively successfully. But we’re still putting ourselves out there in the street to say:

 

“Hey, there’s someone that’s fucking fighting! There’s someone that’s willing to put boys together, join us!”

 

And boys are joining us. Every week we get more and more recruits. The speed of recruitment has only been increasing all year. Every time we do one of these street actions, we get recruits.

 

Thomas Sewell: We had three more recruits in Melbourne just tonight.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. We are accumulating manpower faster and faster and faster, week on week. We’re putting the message out. We’re putting ourselves out there.

 

A lot of people in Australia know who we are, and a lot of people are very supportive. We’ve done street marches down the street and all over the country now, and lots of positive responses from the public. People tooting the horns, throwing romans out the window, grandmas coming over and saying words of encouragement. We get just as much positive reinforcement from the public as negative, if not more positive reinforcement in our recent activism.

 

So there’s a lot of sympathy in the community. People see us on the news all the time. They know who we are and they like us. And maybe there’s a distinction between the American mentality and the Australian mentality. The Americans, they’ve got their own kind of White nationalist street movement scene. This isn’t me throwing shade at them, but probably because of how big America is and how complex American politics are, they aren’t as able as we are to present themselves to the public in a strong way and get the whole political system to kind of react to them like we can. Because Australia’s got nothing going on. It’s a dead political scene. Politics is fucking boring! There’s barely anything happening on the news.

 

So when we do something, it’s a big deal. You know, we’re an established brand here, unlike these American groups. And so we’re able to get a certain kind of response from the public that I think is different than the American groups can.

 

And the thing is, as well, in America, people have a lot of hope in Trump. And in America, people are very concerned with the conservative movement and the Republican Party. And America is a very politicised country. People are very concerned about conservative versus liberal and all this shit in America. In Australia, we live in a very de-politicised society. The average person doesn’t really give a fuck about politics, doesn’t have very strong opinions either way. They have social opinions. They have opinions on race, but they don’t have opinions that are very political, if that makes sense. People are very casually racist. They’ve got casual social opinions about feminism or gays or whatever. It isn’t really kind of contextualised through which party you support and which political leaders you like. Pretty much all the major politicians are just hated by everyone. No one is particularly passionate in support of any of them. No one particularly cares about politics in Australia, quite frankly. It’s a much more minor aspect of our society than in the United States.

 

So part of our job as well, is to do something fucking interesting that someone will care about. In America, you’ve got a pre-existing political system to kind of interface with. The Groypers can sit on the edge of the Trump movement and be relevant. If we tried to sit on the edge of the Australian Right-wing, well, no one’s fucking paying attention to the Right-wing politics anyway. It’s a bunch of boomers that watch cable news. But no one under the age of 50 is even really fucking paying attention. So no one would care. There’s no market there. We have to basically be provocative in order to even get anyone to look at us in the first place.

 

That’s another thing to take into consideration. Why in Australia, it’s like, you’ve got this lame conservative movement and then nothing, and then a bunch of Nazis. In America, you’ve got all these different positions on the Right-wing political spectrum that are being occupied by different actors. We just don’t really have that.

 

So, yeah, like Australia, more one dimensional than American politics, frankly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good spiel. Are we ever going to get through this video? [chuckling]

 

Nick Fuentes: You know, who is that supposed to win over? Is that going to win over elite people? Is that going to win over high IQ people? Is that going to earn the support of any large number of people? Who is that actually attractive to? Who sees an expression like that, which is very negative and very vulgar and very angry and foreign, and say:

“I want to be a part of that! I want to go stand outside in the street in a costume, yelling racial hatred and abuse because of immigration or something.”

So I think it’s just stupid! I’ve said that for years. It’s stupid when Patriot Front does it’s stupid. When Blood Tribe does it’s stupid. When the Alt-Right did it. You know, NSM. And all those TRS, all those guys. It’s just dumb. Like, I don’t believe in larping. I’m American, and I don’t hate anybody. You know, I’m a normal White American. I want this to be a majority White country.

And I’m also intelligent. Like, I’m not an unpleasant coarse person! And these guys, they’ll act like they’re soldiers. I don’t know. Has Joel Davis ever been in a war? You know, you think because you train combat sports that now you’re gonna be like a soldier. They act like they’re veterans. They go march around, yell slurs at people, and then they go in a bar and they act like they just fought a battle.

 

[55:40]

 

Blair Cottrell: I used to agree with this kind of take. This is surreal to me because a few years ago, I was saying similar stuff to this. I was against larping, and I thought that:

 

“What are they doing, these activists the boys, NSN, no one’s ever going to agree with that this is not going to work. Aahh!”

 

I was doing that as well. But I remembered something. I remembered something that Tom told me. Tom told me:

 

“You’ve got to let a thousand flowers blossom.”

 

Right? And I can’t remember where he got that from or whether he. It came to him as a result of his own thinking. Mao?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s an ancient quote. I think Mao copied it from a Greek philosopher.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And I realised that you also need a gang. You need a gang that’s going to back you up, someone that you can put faith in. You need a community.

 

And that’s the thing about us as boys down here in Australia, whether we’re involved in activism or not, we’re all part of that gang, because there’s not many of us down here, and we’re all mates. We know each other, we eat together, we train together, and we back each other up regardless of what it is we’re doing. And we’re all contributing to forging a popular counterculture. I think:

 

“All great movements must be popular movements.”

 

Hitler said. And I can feel that the popularity of nationalism, or even National Socialism is growing, not just in Australia, but around the world. And it’s growing partly as a result of the activism the guys have been doing down here. It’s been making the regular Australian person think that:

 

“Oh, maybe these slogans and catchphrases aren’t that bad.”

 

They smile about it, they laugh about it, they talk about it on job sites. And they are being primed to support the counterculture that is forging, is coming together before our eyes. Right?

 

So I used to believe what Nick believed. I used to say the same stuff he was saying, but I was just getting the same nonsense from the same bullshit, established political forces. And I realised that, as you guys have probably articulated already, you can’t always play by the rules of the establishment or be interested in some sort of careerist position within the parameters and boundaries where the establishment will allow you to operate. That’s too frustrating for me, especially down here in Australia.

 

And I like Nick. I think Nicks, all right. And I like the fact that he has a big viewership. I like anyone who makes our politics more popular because it contributes to the growth of the counterculture throughout majority White nations, extension colonies of Europe and so forth. Right?

 

So that’s my primary concern. I think becoming more popular is at the heart of what we’re doing. And every bit of political activism, stream, commentary, organisation, whatever we’re doing, it’s all contributing in some small way to growing our counterculture, growing the popularity of our counterculture. And look, the recruitment drive has been great. Like, the results will speak for themselves. This is the thing. Even if you want to stay on the side of Fuentes and say:

 

“Yeah, the activism is bullshit! These guys are larpers! We don’t need that. Whatever. What we need to do is just keep streaming and working within the parameters of the current political establishment, and eventually we’ll get somewhere!”

 

Whatever. In a few years time, you’re going to see which one of those approaches is producing the right kind of result. Right? And I don’t think you’re going to see much change, …

 

Joel Davis: Every revolutionary movement starts as larping. You know, there was a time at which Vladimir Lenin was standing in a room with a bunch of like 50 communists or 50 Bolsheviks or whatever, taking themselves really seriously.

 

And I think there was actually a quote once where someone met Vladimir Lenin at a party in Germany somewhere when he was exiled from Russia. And it was like some little Communist Party. That’s kind of funny saying communist. It was like a party, like an actual party, not a political party full of communists. And someone went up and said:

 

“Oh, hello, Vladimir.”

 

And he’s:

 

“Hi, I’m Vladimir Lenin, the future leader of the Russian Revolution.”

 

And he’s kind of laughed, but it was true! But at that time, he just had like this little journal about communist theory that, like, 45 guys were reading and a group of larpers, and they were not even in their actual country. They were exiled to Germany. Ten years later, he leads the Russian Revolution, and now he’s like the dictator of the Soviet Union, and he’s got a Red Army with millions of men, and now he’s done it! You’re larping until you’re not.

 

You know, at one point, when Adolf Hitler joined up with the NSDAP and they had their first meeting, they’re in the beer hall, there’s, like 90 of them. And there’s some guy taking minutes and they’re taking themselves very seriously:

 

“And this is how we’re going to save Germany!”

 

And there’s 90 guys at the pub. Fast forward yourself, you know, 15 years or less. Less like twelve years, ten years. There’s a Nuremberg rally with millions of guys! So everything’s larping until it isn’t!

 

So this idea, …

 

[1:01:01]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So what creates that, though? What makes the larp real?

 

Joel Davis: To become worthy of being taken seriously by anyone.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the force, Joel? What’s the force? And, Tom, you can answer this, too. What is the force that starts making the larp real, that starts giving the larp real power? What is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Inspiration. It’s spirit. It’s spiritual inspiration. Yeah. And that’s what you can’t measure. So Nick can complain about our strategy, and he can’t conceive what we’re doing, and why are we doing it. Because he’s not really inspiring anyone. He’s just got a team of consumers. His audience just simply consume, whereas our audience, we don’t really want them to just consume. We’re trying to get them to be politically mobile. We want them to be activists like us. And Hitler’s success, and even the American Revolutionary success came from inspiration. And Nick wants to say that he’s an American. He says:

 

“I’m an American, so this Australian stuff isn’t really relevant to me.”

 

Well, what about the American Revolution? Is that relevant to Nick Fuentes? Because the American Revolutionaries had uniforms. The American Revolutionaries larped. The American Revolutionaries weren’t attracting the majority of the society at the beginning. There was only a very small percentage of the American colonies of the population that actually supported the American Revolutionaries. But they didn’t need 51%. They just needed the men that had the strength and the courage. And that’s the most important people that you need to recruit and attract and have sympathize with your message. The politically mobile people, the people that will take politics to its nth degree.

 

So we’re inspiring people. And that’s not even really measurable right now in the boots we have on the ground, because what we’ve done is we’re setting ourselves up as a brand. We’re setting, you know, Joel called it earlier in the stream, he called it. What was it like? Not Right-wing drama. But you said it was, not theatre, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Performance art.

 

Thomas Sewell: Performance art! Yes. So if we’re going to describe it as that, it allows people to see the distinction. It allows the average person on the street, like, we don’t even need the banner anymore. We don’t even need a banner. We don’t even need to bring a flag. When people see us now, when they see us in formation, they immediately know what side they’re on. Does that make sense? They immediately, …

 

Joel Davis: We bring the banner to make a statement. We don’t have to bring the banner to identify who we are the banner is why we are there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. When people see us now, they either smile or they’re afraid or they are a communist or something.

 

But that’s really it. There’s like, the traitors, the lukewarm and the fighters. And when the fighters, when the people that care about Australia, when they see us, even if they’re not physical fighters, they’re just moral fighters. When the moral fighters, when they see us, they smile. They say:

 

“Good on your boys!”

 

They wave at us. Sometimes they even throw Roman salutes at us. And they’re not necessarily Nazis. They don’t necessarily even know anything about Hitler, anything about World War Two. They just know how fucked up society is! And they know that we’re the only ones in the country actually standing up to it! Really properly, just being like, fuck this! [chuckling] We’re 100% against all this. We’re standing up for it.

 

And that’s why people are putting their trust in us that’s beyond the metrics of the normal political system. That’s beyond the Liberal political system. The trust they have in us is on a different level.

 

Blair Cottrell: Just to play contrarian, because some people might be thinking this, I think. Do you think you run the risk of just becoming a spectacle or object of amusement for these people who are smiling at you but who never intend to join? Do you think there’s the risk of that?

 

Joel Davis: A lot of people don’t intend to join. Because that’s the thing. Like, we don’t need everyone. Like, we want to have lots of supporters. Like, it’s not just about whether you join or don’t join. There’s kind of two tiers. There’s, like, building the radical group of people that actually join, obviously. But then there’s the effect on the wider community. And that was what I thought was so good about the Fuck Off, We’re Full rally that we did. I read through the comments. There was one upload of it on TikTok that got, like, nearly a million views just on that one upload until it was taken down of that rally. And the comments were pretty much all positive.

 

And there was a lot of people commenting in there that were quite clearly just normal conservative types. Like, they weren’t, like, full on “the Holocaust was fake! Hitler’s awesome!” type people. There were just a normal Right-wing people that just don’t like immigration. And they were like:

 

“This is awesome! How good is someone standing up against it?”

 

And then people were like:

 

“Oh, but they’re Nazis!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, they’re not Nazis! You know, they’re just good, like, patriots or whatever!”

 

This kind of thing. [chuckling] And it was quite interesting because we are Nazis. And we put ourselves forward in balaclavas and black, and we’re all intimidating, yet still we’re able to solicit the sympathy of normal Right-wing White people, which is perfect when you can marry those two things together. And that’s kind of our objective. Our objective is to try and get normal Right-wing White people or Right leaning White people, patriotic leaning White people, to start looking at us and sympathizing with us. Because convincing 50% of Australians that National Socialism is good, theoretically, that’s never going to happen.

 

But if we can show them National Socialism in practice by actually putting bodies in the street, in a way that’s we’re standing up for them against the people that they know they don’t like, against things they don’t like the trans people, grooming of children and these immigrants pouring into the country and so on. And they go:

 

“Wait a second. Like, these guys are obviously the good guys in this arrangement!”

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you say, Tom, that’s what you hear most from the women Tom? Is that what you said?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve heard that thousands of times over the past two or three years. From women, specifically women. I don’t really hear it ever from men, but from women. That is what they keep saying in person and online. That is what they keep saying. That is something that is echoing, constantly echoing! Every time we do a rally, every time we do a demonstration, every time we cross paths with a woman that’s sympathetic to us. They say these words:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s curious, because in our Mein Kampf, Hitler writes that the quality of a movement, that is to say, whether or not it’s effective, can be measured by how many women are supportive of it. That if the women don’t like it’s never going to be popular, it’s never going to be good, it’s never going to be effective.

 

So, yeah, it’s curious. And I think what he meant by that is, obviously that the regular people are of a feminine predisposition. So if you want to appeal to regular people, then you have to appeal to the feminine element within people. I think that’s what he was getting at.

 

But what he’s basically written down there is, if only men are interested in your politics, you need to rework it, you need to simplify it. You need to make it palpable to the feminine instinct. Then you’ll become popular, because then you’ll appeal to the masses. Right?

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing about when the kind of militant presentation and the show of strength, that’s kind of what part of that is about. It’s kind of like sexy. It’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be refined. It can’t be vulgar. It must be refined strength. And that’s, like, something that I think in recent years, you guys have really gotten down pat.

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s something that we definitely want to improve. I mean, we’re just starting out.

 

I mean, look at the SS uniformity now. That’s sexy! When a man walked into the bar in 1932, Munich, wearing his SS uniform, the girls are like, “hmmm!” when he walks in because that’s a man. That’s a sexy man in uniform right there. And that’s probably part of the reason why the women were going crazy for the Nazis and why they’re off the front row throwing Romans and clapping for Hitler and why women voted. I think women actually outvoted men for the Nazis in the election. Because they were like:

 

“Yeah, these are some men! These are some proper sexy men coming bringing change to Germany!”

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the second most common thing that I hear from the women. They don’t necessarily say “sexy”, although there is a few women that are in a different age bracket that probably shouldn’t be saying that to us that do. But and they know who they are. That’s slightly problematic, but anyway.

 

The second most common thing that I hear, is they say:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

They just simply say that:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

That’s what they say.

 

So the first most common thing that I hear is:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

And the second most common thing that they say is:

 

“Here are some men. Finally, some men!”

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be a sad reality.

 

Thomas Sewell: Nick would never understand that. Nick would never understand that.

 

Blair Cottrell: But it must be a pretty, … Imagine being a woman in this world. And you once knew what men were. I mean, I suppose this is women like of the older generations. They once were surrounded by men, and now it’s like they’re all gone!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And in their place, there’s this hollowed out shell of men that doesn’t really feel masculine, and so they feel, … It must be a scary reality for women to feel like within their own nation, they don’t have men looking after them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it’s the Albaneses, the Kevin Rudds the Scomos. These are all husbands. They’re all husbands. They would be too afraid to upset a mouse. Yeah, they’re just husbands. They’re housebound. They do as they’re told. They pee sitting down. They pee sitting down!

 

Blair Cottrell: House negroes! Not like us field negroes! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, we’re wignats. You know? We’re wignats, as Nick puts it. You know, it’s like we don’t care about the establishment. We don’t care what it thinks. The establishment has lost, has broke the social contract. They have broken the social contract! They don’t deserve respect. They don’t deserve us larping as them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Can someone clarify for me? Can someone clarify what, … I think I know, but probably an embarrassing question. What is a “wignat”? What is that? Because Nick called me a wignat.

 

Joel Davis: Wigger Nationalists. So a wigger is a White nigger.

 

And so it was a term that was basically created to attack, quote, unquote, “trailer trash nationalism” in America, where guys are showing up fat, covered in tattoos, waving swastika flags, like:

 

“Yeah, fuck niggers!”

 

And people would say:

 

“Oh, like, wigger nationalism!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh no!

 

Joel Davis: But it’s, like, really inaccurate because, I mean, Blair isn’t really a wigger, is he? , …

 

Blair Cottrell: I would like to think that I’m not. But I find that curious because, …

 

Joel Davis: Define basically anyone who is, too, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I’m the personification of the racist Australian! And I didn’t even know what “wignat” was. So that might be some perspective for Nick to take on board. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

[1:12:43]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I don’t know. It’s just, again, it’s applying Americanisms to Australia. But also, I would say us showing up in black, I think we look cool! I think looking cool, … Blair talks about this. That looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics. Because it’s about aesthetics. It’s about, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately, it’s true.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And I remember when the boys did, because I was in Melbourne at the time, when the boys did the Destroy Pedos rally, and they were they showed up, they gate crashed the feminist versus tranny protest kind of clash last year. I remember you saying:

 

“I wasn’t so sure about this whole project that you guys have started, but this sold me because you guys look cool.”

 

And they’re showing them on the news, walking around, you know, muscly, in the black, throwing the Roman back when we could still throw Romans and it was still legal. And they did. They looked objectively cool. Like, the news started, like, blurring out their arms, because those muscly Roman arms were just too good aesthetics, the jews were getting too offended. [chuckling] But it looked fucking cool!

 

And that’s the thing you could say:

 

“Oh, does that appeal to everyone?”

 

Yeah, but, like, everything, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It almost does. One. One of the core components of looking cool is just being fit. You know, just being fit makes you look cool. It makes you look good in anything you wear. So that in itself, … If you’re in a individual sense or on a private basis, if you’re dedicating, you know, an hour or two a day to bodybuilding, fight training, cardiovascular activity, and you’re actually getting fit. What you’re doing there is almost using your time in such a way where you’re on an individual basis contributing to the broader collective, because when you do show up to events, you’re going to look good, and as a result, you’re going to make the collective look better, and then more people are going to want to join it. That’s pretty simple stuff.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, it’s important to look cool. I think we pull off looking cool.

 

I mean, I’ve seen our clips and pictures of us getting used by nationalists all over the world. People seem to really, really like us all over the global scene, including a lot of Americans. We seem to appeal to a lot of Americans. Our largest audience for this show is American. We got more Americans than Australians watching, by my metric, by my counting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Which demonstrates that there’s obviously an appeal. This show has some sort of appeal to an American audience. So maybe there’s something to learn from us?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, exactly. And I agree. Sometimes a little bit more discipline would be good. Like, as we get bigger, we will probably want to refine it and make it a little bit more disciplined, a little bit more formal as it matures and we have more manpower and so on to convey, like, a deeper seriousness.

 

But in a lot of respects, what will create the seriousness of the movement is just the sheer quantity. Like, if we’re doing the same thing we’re doing now, but with way larger numbers, then Australia will have to take notice. Like, there’s a certain scale of people where if it’s 10,000 of us in the street doing what we do, that can’t be ignored! Like, it just simply can’t be ignored. People are going to have to take us seriously and what we represent seriously.

 

And so I said this on Twitter today, that I think the difficulty White nationalism has in appealing to the White masses isn’t necessarily anything inherent to the ideology. Like, White nationalism, I think, is inherently appealing. There’s a reason why White people used to all be White nationalists, because it’s obviously inherently appealing, because it’s an ideology built around what’s good for White people.

 

So if you’re a White person, why wouldn’t that appeal to you?

 

So there’s a lot of inherent appeal in the idea. The problem is that people have become so demoralised, and the idea has become so attacked and kind of sidelined that people don’t really believe in it as something viable.

 

Like, the common refrain that I get from so many people is not necessarily that it wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing if we had a White country or if we could send the brown people back, or if we could close the borders and so on. Most people, right of centre and even in the centre, you know, that ideal isn’t necessarily the worst idea to them, but what is:

 

“It’s so unrealistic. How are you going to go about doing that? I mean, let’s get real here!”

 

And so on. They don’t believe that it’s possible. They don’t believe that you could ever mobilise enough support, enough political will to actually pull it off. That’s the thing, holding people back, not the inherent notion of the idea. And people don’t want to throw their chips on the most controversial idea in society with, 20 other guys, with a dream.

 

But eventually, if we can grow to enough strength where we actually look serious, where we can be taken seriously due to our size, then all of a sudden, people have something to believe in:

 

“Wow, these guys are really growing. This is actually a movement!”

 

Now. All of a sudden, the idea of White nationalism isn’t just an abstract idea. Now it’s actually a real movement that is growing in your country of guys that look like you, that look like your brother, that look like your cousin, that look like you’re mate at work or look like your best friend, and they’re all in the street together, shoulder to shoulder.

 

And it’s like, what does that mean? Then all of a sudden, the people are going to be inspired.

 

Then all of a sudden, the discourse is going to change. And that can’t really be quantified. That’s, that comes down to the will, and it comes down to, its a spiritual thing, really. It’s not something that can be quantified in a series of rational arguments. But the monkey brain of:

 

“I have to conform with society because I don’t want to become some outcast of society and embrace this radically marginalised idea!”

 

All of a sudden, when it’s 10,000 men walking down the street, the monkey brain is going to shift and say:

 

“Well, this is actually something I can consider now!”

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Like, they did this one study where they got a control group and then another group, and they would show images on the screen, and there’d be, like, a shape. It was a blue shape. And they got everyone in the room other than the individual they were testing to all say it was green, and the individual, and it was blue, though. But they got everyone else to say it’s green.

 

And then they go to the guy who’s, like, not in on it and say:

 

“What colour is that shape?”

 

And a lot of the time they conformed, even though they can see that it’s blue. They say:

 

“It’s green.”

 

Because everyone else is saying it’s green:

 

“I guess it must be green, and I’m crazy! I don’t want to be the weirdo that says it’s blue!”

 

And then they have another group under different conditions. And what they found is that, like people are highly conformist, basically. People will literally call something green blue or blue green or whatever just to conform over something, something as goofy as that.

 

And that is happening on a mass scale on the issue of race. Like, everyone can see that there’s a racial problem. The average White person can feel it deep down inside, but they repress it. There has to be some kind of spiritual force that like, brings that racial feeling back up to the surface and tells them:

 

“Actually those feelings that you have deep down inside those are valid. There’s hundreds of thousands of other people, millions of other White people that feel exactly the same!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that’s why people smile? Do you think that’s why people are amused when they see someone who’s pointing out that the races aren’t equal or who’s representing some form of racial nationalism? People almost smile because there is some element to comedy that I don’t fully understand where the truth is actually funny, if you point out a truth that you’re not supposed to point out or notice because it might make people a little bit uncomfortable. What do you think, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I mean, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s got to be. It’s got to be like:

 

“Oh, wow!”

 

Yeah. It’s like:

 

“Oh, wow, the truth that we’re not supposed to see. He’s saying it. Oh, my God!”

 

It’s, like, really shocking! Maybe why people smile. Comedians understand this principle better than I do, but I know there’s a correlation between comedy and truth, and probably that’s why people are so amused by racism. Like, the younger generation, Zoomers*, they love racism! I’ve never met a generation that uses, like, derogatory slurs for certain races more than the Zoomers do, and they think it’s hilarious! Probably it’s hilarious to them, because these slurs usually based on some observable reality within certain races. And so they’re not entirely devoid of truth. Actually, they’re quite accurate in a lot of cases. [chuckling] And so the Zoomers find them genuinely amusing.

 

[* Generation Z (often shortened to Gen Z), also known as Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years, with the generation most frequently being defined as people born from 1997 to 2012. Most members of Generation Z are the children of younger Baby Boomers or Generation X. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I think people also smile at the shock factor. There’s a shock factor to go from living your daily life, contending with pajeets and everything else that’s going on and getting fatigue from the society that you’re living in, and then just randomly out of the blue for seemingly no reason at all, there’s just 50 Nazis marching down the street chanting “blood and honour!” And that just seems crazy on the surface level. But there’s value in the shock of that because it’s like a big wake up! It’s like a big shake up of the psyche.

 

And if someone just went into the letterbox, for example, and it was just this very, very common sense and reasonable diatribe about the nature of the economy and how it’s not doing too well, and the schools are getting a bit overcrowded and maybe we should look at reducing immigration to a more sustainable level. It’s not going to shock the psyche. They’re going to read it, someone’s going to rationalise it, but they’re not going to do anything about it.

 

And that’s because, I don’t really believe that the rational is that powerful at the moment. I think we’re in a very chaotic time where the rational seems to not work. I’m a very rational person. I’m obsessed with the rational. I’m obsessed with logic and truth and natural law. For some reason. I’m just obsessed. I’m built that way. And so being a White nationalist is so frustrating because the average person in society seems to not care about the truth!

 

They seem to not care about what’s rational and what’s reasonable. They don’t actually care. Nobody cares about that stuff. They care more about the football. And the football is irrational. Why are they all waving brown and yellow flags? Or why are they waving purple and yellow flags? These are irrational concepts. What the fuck has that purple, … It has no symbolic meaning. It’s not even local. So I talk to guys, you know, chippy [carpenter] at work, plumber at work. They say:

 

“Oh, what footy team do you go for?”

 

I go:

 

“Honestly, man, I don’t go for a footy team. What team do you go for?”

 

And they say:

 

“Oh, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Oh, you’re from Brisbane?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, I just like, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“What the fuck? You’re not even from Brisbane!”

 

It’s so irrational! But why do they like Brisbane Lions?:

 

“Oh, man, I like the lion, man. You know, I like lions. They had a fucking good team when I started, you know, watching the footy, or my uncle goes for them!”

 

It’s just so fucking irrational! If I was to go for a football team, I mean, I grew up in Balwyn*, you know, that, I would go for Balwyn Tigers or something. I would go for the local football team. That’s who I would go for!

 

[* Balwyn is a suburb of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 10 km east of Melbourne’s Central Business District, located within the City of Boroondara local government area. Balwyn recorded a population of 13, 495 at the 2021 census. The suburb’s post-European settlement character was initially agricultural with several large estates built around a small village centre. Since the early 20th century, farms and mansions gave way to suburban development as the population of Melbourne rapidly grew. Today Balwyn is almost entirely residential and one of Victoria’s most exclusive and affluent suburbs, regularly Ranking in the state’s top 10 most expensive suburbs. Wikipedia]

 

[1:24:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course, obviously.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, because that’s like, there’s guys that I worked with or guys that I went to school with that played for that team. So that’s who I would go for. That’s like a rational, but that’s like the minority.

 

So we’re living in an irrational time. Now. I can complain about that. I can seethe about that and go:

 

“Why is everyone so irrational?”

 

And pull all my hair out. Or I can maybe go:

 

“Okay, is this what Evola was talking about, riding the tiger?”

 

Like, yeah, it’s like, it’s not a rational situation. And if the irrational is so powerful right now, then maybe need to shock people with the irrational!

 

And I think there’s enough people doing the rational, and I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere. I think we need the dramatisation. I think we need the irrational. We need to evoke emotion! I think emotion in this time is far more in the chaos of everything that’s going on, it’s the only way to really speak to people.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I think what you represent is rational. So it’s almost like people are so irrational that the rational is shocking to them.

 

Joel Davis: And it’s like you can rationally describe, … I’ve spoken to so many people who rationally understand it’s the jews and the Holocaust was fake and Hitler’s been unfairly demonised, and the White race is being genocided, but they’re fucking pussies!

 

Thomas Sewell: They won’t do anything.

 

Joel Davis: They will never do anything because they’re fucking pussies! The Whiteman needs to go back some fucking balls! The Whiteman needs to go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to fucking do something about it. We’re going to fight back!”

 

Like, I spent the last couple days arguing in a Twitter space with a lot of these people who are red pilled on all the relevant subjects, but they don’t think that it’s possible for the Whiteman to take back his country, our countries. They don’t think that the Whiteman is capable of actually building a political movement on the basis of defending himself. They don’t think that! They have no belief in us. And every single guy in those, I mean, you can’t see people in Twitter Spaces, but every single guy who has that opinion, their voices were all the most piss weak, low testosterone voices in the Twitter space.

 

And then the guys that come in the Twitter space with a bit of fucking balls that you can hear, like, a bit of aggression in their voice, they’re all like:

 

“Fuck, yeah, I agree with you, Joel. Hail Hitler! Fuck these cucks!”

 

Like [Tom, [chuckling] ] so that’s ultimately what it comes down to. When Fuentes says:

 

“Are we going to be attracting the high IQ guys with our message, with our meathead strategy?”

 

I’m pretty high IQ. You know, its objectively true that I have a high IQ, but I’m going to go and hang out with the so-called meatheads, right? Because the meatheads have some fucking balls and they’re going to try and do something! I spent years trying to try to wrangle the high IQ intellectual types into doing anything, and you can’t!

 

Blair Cottrell: No.

 

Joel Davis: Because they have such a high IQ that they can rationalise everything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re too smart for that. They’re too smart for everything.

 

Joel Davis: Nothing will work! High IQ people are:

 

“Nothing will work!”

 

With all the reasons why nothing can ever work. Why:

 

“That doesn’t make sense and this won’t work. And you can’t do this!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And because faith, faith transcends reason.

 

Joel Davis: I’d rather have guys who go:

 

“Yeah, Joel, fuck yeah. Hail Hitler!”

 

And actually does something that I tell them to do because they’re like:

 

“All right, I believe in you seem like a Whiteman who’s smart and knows what you’re talking about. I’m gonna fucking do what you say!”

 

I’d much rather that, to be honest, because that person is gonna actually do something. They’re gonna actually put some kind of will into the world, put some chest into the world and actually take the fight to the enemy in some way. And if we can build thousands and thousands and tens of thousands and so on, and men like that that are willing to fight and sacrifice and put in the fucking work to build a political movement, to force a political movement into existence that actually stands for our race, now we’ve got a fucking fighting chance! Now we’ve got actually someone fighting in the corner of the Aryan and ready to actually take on the system, which we currently don’t have.

 

[1:28:08]

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with being smart is its hard to really believe anything when you’re smart.

 

And so thank God that the majority of people aren’t smart because then it would be really hard to manage them because the majority of people believe things really easily. But Joel, I think you’re a pretty, like unique blend of someone who’s quite intelligent, but you’re also capable of believing and dedicating yourself to something. Right? That’s a good combination.

 

You brought up the footy, Tom. What do you guys think of that Aboriginal spokesperson who said that:

 

“‘Welcome to Country’* has been happening for 250,000 years!”

 

So apparently the abos have been around since, …

 

[* A Welcome to Country is a ritual or formal ceremony performed as a land acknowledgement at many events held in Australia. It is an event intended to highlight the cultural significance of the surrounding area to the descendants of a particular Aboriginal clan or language group who were recognised as the original human inhabitants of the area. For the Welcome to be recognised as official, it must be performed by a recognised elder of the group. Welcomes to Country are sometimes accompanied by traditional smoking ceremonies, music or dance. Where an elder is not available to perform the welcome, or there is not a recognised traditional owner, an Acknowledgement of Country may be offered instead. Since 2008, when it was made on the day before Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the Apology to Australia’s Indigenous peoples, a Welcome to Country has been incorporated into the ceremonial opening of the Parliament of Australia, an event which occurs after each federal election. Wikipedia]

 

Joel Davis: Shall I play the clip Blair? Do you want, you want me to play the clip?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure. It’s only a quick one. You can bring it up and find it if you got it ready.

 

Joel Davis: Give me a minute to pull it up. I’ll get it.

 

Thomas Sewell: [words unclear] Keep going. Keep doing it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just keep doing it. Like, never interrupt an enemy when they’re making a mistake.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, I’ve got a little strategy going on behind the scenes as to how I can, sort of how we can profit from this phenomenon. And I’ll explain what that is after we play the video. Yeah. 250,000 years Aboriginals have been doing it. Apparently they were here for 40,000 years before we got here. And then it was 50,000, then it was 70,000, and, 2000,000! But the meme remains, man! The mean remains true. Even if it is 250,000 years. 250,000 years, and invented a stick. Invented a stick! Yeah.

 

So I wouldn’t be proud of that! It’s like the longer you were here before we got here, the worse it looks for you. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, this is it. Let’s play it.

 

Brendan Kerin (part abo): It’s not a ceremony that we’ve invented to cater for White people. It’s a ceremony we’ve been doing for 250,000 years plus, BC. And the BC stands for Before Cook [Captain Cook]. Prior to colonisation you could get yourself into a lot of trouble for walking on someone else’s lands without being welcomed onto those lands.

 

Blair Cottrell: I really like seeing those guys. The head turns, the reactions, the kind of like:

 

“What? What did he just say?”

 

And even the crowd didn’t know how to react, really. They’re on the edge there. They’re teetering on the edge of actually reacting. And next time they hear that, they might react. Right?

 

So this tickled me a little bit because I come from an AFL family, right? My father and grandfather were playing and my cousin’s playing for Carlton now. So I thought:

 

“Oh, I don’t like this. The boys should have done something about this. I thought maybe I could work some Scorpio magic and make something happen behind the scenes. I thought, I’ll make a little clip. I won’t send it to my cousin directly because he’ll be able to show the boys within the AFL community and maybe, …”

 

I think the grand final’s on this weekend, isn’t it? Maybe at the grand final there’ll be some sort of reaction? Who knows, maybe next season, whatever.

 

But the idea is that he doesn’t see it directly from me because then he’ll feel like I’m pulling his arm and he won’t want to show anyone. But if he comes across it. Because I haven’t spoken to him in a few years. If he comes across it by himself, if I can get it sent around enough, he’d be like:

 

“Oh, this is my cousin! Look at this, boys. He’s talking about the footy!”

 

You know what I mean? So that was the that was the plan with that? We’ll see if it comes to fruition over time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I mean, that’s egregious. He basically put out a threat that, like:

 

“Oh, well, if we don’t welcome you, then people would get in a lot of trouble!”

 

Like, as if. Like what are you implying? He’s basically implying a very deep hostility there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: And what I always like to say to the Aboriginals is, if you’re not happy, if you don’t want to concede the loss, that, like:

 

“We won, you lost. We conquered. You got conquered. Suck shit!”

 

If you don’t like that equation and you want the country back, then let’s rematch! Let’s fucking rematch! Let’s go again! We can have it out again.

 

And this time the winner gets the country and the loser won’t exist anymore. It’s over! Like, it’s done! It’s finished! There’s not going to be any more toleration. And if we lose, fine, we could pack up and go back to England, or you can slaughter us all. I say that’s fair enough, because I don’t think you’re going to win! You’re going to have a bunch of abos and some, like, communist sympathizers or something, versus all of us that actually, every, like, Whiteman with some fucking balls and backbone. I think there’s only one winner in that situation. So I’m quite happy to do. To do a rematch.

 

And I know that they don’t! I know that they have absolutely no hope in hell and they know it, of winning a rematch. They’re just bitching and complaining! It’s a fucking victimocracy that we live in a complainocracy. And they know that the more and more that they bitch at the Whiteman, the more and more free shit they get given!

 

[1:33:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s what makes it even more cringe, the fact that these people that are paid to complain at these ceremonies, football games and stuff, they’re paid by the government to do that. They’re politically privileged, professional victims as I said in the video response that I posted to it. And that just makes it even more cringe, especially to the average Australian viewer who really doesn’t think much of the person who’s being put on a pedestal by the government. That’s not a real great way to get the average person in Australia to support your cause.

 

But, yeah, it ties into what Joel raised last time as “Aboriginal fatigue”. People are so fatigued by this. They’re so sick of it! Yeah, and Aboriginal fatigue is such a prominent thing now that even members for Parliament are speaking out against it. Even Pauline Hanson* stood up and said:

 

“Hey, let’s just ban this Welcome to Country stuff altogether.”

 

[* Pauline Hanson’s One Nation (PHON or ONP), also known as One Nation or One Nation Party, is a Right-wing populist political party in Australia. It is led by Pauline Hanson. One Nation was founded in 1997, by Member of Parliament Pauline Hanson and her advisors David Ettridge and David Oldfield after Hanson was disendorsed as a federal candidate for the Liberal Party of Australia. The disendorsement came before the 1996 federal election following comments she made about Indigenous Australians. Oldfield, a councillor on Manly Council in suburban Sydney and at one time an employee of Liberal minister Tony Abbott, was the organisational architect of the party. Hanson sat as an independent for one year before forming Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.]

 

Joel Davis: We don’t mean, like the Aboriginal asleep on a park bench at 10:00 in the morning because the bottle shop opens at 8:30 kind of fatigue. I mean the White fatigue are dealing with this shit!

 

But the thing is with this whole issue, it’s basically just a humiliation ritual, like, over and over and over and over again! And it’s the kind of thing where, like all of those football players, as you described, that are standing there and just taking it like every single one of them is a fucking pussy! Because you can see it on the faces of a lot of the White players that they don’t appreciate it, but then they’re on a million dollar contract and they don’t want to lose that million dollar contract. So they just have to stand there and cop it like good little goys.

 

When is someone going to show some balls and stand up? I thought Blair’s call to action was quite good. You know, if as soon as any White celebrity of any kind actually takes a stand against this, we’re going to be there behind them. Maybe [chuckling] they don’t want us behind him! Maybe to make it worse for them, but fuck it! We’ll be there behind him supporting them. Because I could see it being one of these cascade reactions where if one person is willing to be the first lemming to jump off the cliff, then there could be a pile on it. Could be quite a powerful move.

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think footy banners would be effective, too, something we could explore in the future. We did a footy banner back in the day and it caused huge [chuckling] upset and we were banned for life from the MCG! I don’t know how they intend to implement that ban. But I haven’t been back since. I haven’t tried to go back.

 

Joel Davis: Have you got an idea for a slogan.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, like something we could discuss in private, I guess. I probably already showed my cards too directly on that one. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I thought about would it be funny to streak the grand final? But the tickets are so expensive. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s best to wait to see if one of the players, or I even like a few of the players, walk off or do something. And if nothing happens, because this will get worse, they’ll keep pushing. These Aboriginals are never happy. They’ll go out there and say something even worse next time they get the opportunity to time the representatives for their community hired by the government, who are like 10% Aboriginal, 90% White, but identify entirely with their Aboriginal heritage! Even though Aboriginal heritage, people from that heritage are supposedly so oppressed. But White people are privileged. However, they choose to disavow all their privilege and just identify with the oppressed clan for some reason. It’s all bullshit!

 

But the point is that it’s going to get worse!

 

And I think if the players don’t do anything, if the clubs don’t do anything, it’s probably some, like some banner time, then it might be time to show up.

 

Joel Davis: The clubs are all [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: The clubs themselves won’t, but the players might. But the problem with the players is they’re very soldierly. That’s the way they’re trained. And so they won’t do anything unless it’s as a unit. One of them won’t just whimsically walk off on his own. He’ll wait for the boys to. It’d have to be like a collaborative effort, a planned thing that happens behind closed doors between the players that have to discuss it, talk about it, how they’re going to do it, keep it to themselves. It’s unlikely, but there’s still a small possibility it could happen.

 

Joel Davis: Whoever wants to lead it, though, they can become a hero. Like, yeah, you might end up, you’re going to get a lot of controversy, but you’ll become a hero of the Australian people if you, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah! Put it this way, you’ll be the most famous footballer of our era and not for having played good football. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But yeah, but I support the fake Aboriginals. Like, you know, people say:

 

“Oh, look, there’s always people taking all these Aboriginal benefits and they’re just White people that are pretending to be Aboriginals. I support it. I think every White person, if you can, become a fake Aboriginal, get all the Aboriginal money. And the more of us that could become fake Aboriginals, the more of a mockery we can make of this whole thing. We should have the maximized amount of White fraud of the Aboriginal, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got too much pride, man! I’ve got so much pride to do that. I can’t get around saying, I’m Aboriginal. I just can’t do it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, you don’t have to outwardly, you know, present yourself to the public as an Aboriginal.

 

But, yeah, we need the Abo-Saxon race must rise! The Abo-Saxon tribe, …

 

[1:38:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they ask you that everywhere. They ask you that everywhere in Australia:

 

“Are you of Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander descent?”

 

When you’re going for a job, when you’re going into education, when you’re going into jail, they ask you all the time.

 

And I’ve always wondered, like, I never understood before I got into politics. I wondered, why do they keep asking me that? And now I know, like, there’s all these special privileges you get if you are of those descents, but it’s just something I’ve got too much pride to try to exploit, personally.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough.

 

So we should maybe cover some, like, stories in the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom mentioned that he wanted to bring up. The event that we went to on the weekend, because I don’t know if you’ve seen Joel.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! I think we should avoid talking about that, actually. Let’s not talk about that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why? Well, it’s been in the news today just recently. There’s a big article on it because the restaurant owner has I don’t know. Do you want to bring it up or not? We don’t have to.

 

Joel Davis: I think we should avoid it. I should avoid the subject.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s up to you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Let’s have a look here. What’s going on? Well, there was the story.

 

So basically, the Premier of, I mean whenever we talk about Australian politicians, it’s just like racial cuckoldry to the max! I mean, it’s so bad.

 

So this is the Victorian remier, what’s her name? Jacinta Allen. She has promised to reserve 25% of the state’s regional work visas for international students, putting them on track to stay in Australia permanently. So she’s basically met with the Indians and is trying to facilitate helping more Indians exploit our immigration system to move into regional areas. So, like, White flight isn’t an option. Like, people think:

 

“Oh, just get out of the cities, move to the country towns!”

 

Yeah, well, the government is sending Indians to you, too! There’s really no escape from this. At some point we’re going to have to stop White flighting and start fighting back.

 

But, yeah, like, it’s kind of also somewhat unprecedented or rarely precedent for the state government to intervene on immigration and try and overpower, like, get involved in what is supposed to be a federal issue.

 

But, you know, of course she went over to India, met with the Indians, and every time an Australian politician goes to meet with the Indians, they always come back with the promise to bring more Indians into Australia. Like, why is the Indian government so intent on trying to facilitate sending their people into our country? It’s like, it must be some kind of strategy. Like, the Indian government must have realised:

 

“Like, fuck! Like, we’ve got 1.4 billion people. They’ve got like 26 million or whatever, and they’re stupid enough to take hundreds of thousands of us every single year. If we just keep shipping them in, eventually we can just colonise Australia. We wouldn’t even have to fight a war or anything. We can just keep dumping them in there, dumping them in there, dumping them in there for the next 20 years, and eventually we’ll just take over!”

 

And our government is like:

 

“Yes!”

 

Like just totally complicit in it. Why? Like, what even leverage did they really have over us, the Indian government? They don’t have any really ostensible leverage. It’s just like pure cuckoldry. It’s insane! Like, yeah, we’re in like some kind of vague military alliance with them. And I’m sure there’s some kind of backhanded deals they do with our politicians, but they’re trying to win some Indian votes. Obviously, the Labor Party specifically has identified the fact that Indians vote Labour at much higher rates than the average.

 

So if you can get a White electorate and you can stuff enough Indians in it, you can flip it from voting more Right-wing to voting Labour. And it can become a solid Labour seat because a lot of the White Leftists are voting Greens now. So Labour seems to be just tripling down on importing voters from India rather than trying to figure out how to appeal to the people who already live here to the White Australians.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty fucking disgusting!

 

Allen, you were telling me, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Jacinta Allen’s from Bendigo. I think she grew up there. And so she took a particular, well, she was particularly disdainful of our activism in Bendigo. And then she became Transport Minister while Daniel Andrews was premier.

 

And obviously she was pretty chummy with Andrews, because she ended up taking over the job of premier after he., … What did he do? I think he stepped down for some reason, but I don’t know. I won’t divert from the story too much, but Jacinta Allen, while she was Minister for Transport, was the minister who banned Sky News from all public spaces over which government had jurisdiction, such as trains and train stations, because I’d been on Sky News and she was worried that someone might see the interview of me on Sky News. [chuckling] So she’s totally against free speech. She’s totally pro-system, anti-worker, anti-Australian people. She doesn’t want the Australian people to have any real representation.

 

So it’s no surprise that she’s doing shit like this. It’s just classic, just Jacinta Allen, just classic systemite, bureaucrat shit! And this is exactly why we need a complete overhaul of our political system. Total revolution! We can’t work within its parameters necessarily, because there’s people like this at the helm. Like Jacinta Allen is now the premier of our state. And this is someone who’s extremely hostile, not just to the politics we represent, but to the Australian working class. Right?

 

[1:44:02]

 

And it reminds me of Yuri Bezmenov* lecture when he said:

 

“Your country’s been thoroughly subverted and prepared for total destabilisation and takeover when the people who have power are actually hated or despised by the voters, by the working class.”

 

So the masses, despite the fact that despite them hating their leaders so much, the leaders are still in power somehow, and yet there’s supposed to be a democracy. That’s apparently the point at which your country’s on its knees. It’s been thoroughly subverted from within. And I suppose that’s the position that our country’s in right now, unfortunately.

 

[* Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov (December 11, 1939 – January 5, 1993) was a Soviet journalist for Novosti Press Agency. In 1970, as a member of the Soviet mission in New Delhi, India, Bezmenov defected to the West and was re-settled in Canada pursuant to an arrangement between American and Canadian security agencies. Wikipedia]

 

But there’s silver linings to this. Because the book I’m reading of, just about finished reading by David Kilcullen, describes the fitness effects, which I’ve talked about to some degree on a couple of spaces recently. The fitness effect is a phenomenon where a group or organisation, a philosophy, people who represent a philosophy, whatever it may be, it’s the same for criminal gangs, sometimes. There needs to be an appropriate amount of consistent pressure in order for the group to respond to adaptation and overcome that pressure in time. If there’s not enough pressure, the group can stagnate. If there’s too much pressure, it can be crushed completely. But I tend to think that we have just enough pressure in order to effectively adapt to and overcome our adversaries at this point, if things remain on the trajectory they’re currently on, I feel it’s the perfect amount of pressure for us to.

 

And it’s an exciting thought. What we could actually learn. We’re being forced to adapt to an enemy, which is putting that appropriate amount of pressure on us. And what’s exciting is how powerful we may become so long as we survive as a race.

 

I think the reason why our race is being targeted for extermination is because that’s the only way to guarantee defeat against White people generally or against, you know, descendants of Europe.

 

If they’re given the same opportunity to procreate, flourish, develop, they eventually become master of the world. And so to defeat them, you have to actually annihilate their race. You have to impose a plan of genocide onto them. And that’s exactly why our adversaries today are doing that. Because if we live as a race, we win. We win eventually! We adapt and win. So all we have to do is survive, and victory is guaranteed!

 

So they understand that, too, I think, which is why the genocide programs are in place.

 

Joel Davis: And the main thing that has held White people back, particularly in recent years, is that we’re too fucking nice. And what White people are learning through this process is that the morality of being the nice guys of the world is ultimately not fit to survive. That the people who want to hold on to that are going to die! Every single institution, culturally, socially, etcetera, that wants to hold on to the “nice guy” morality of the White cuck is going to die with the White cuck. And all that’s going to remain is the “No More Mr Nice Guy, White Guy”.

 

All that’s going to remain is the Whiteman who finds his balls and regains a sense of brutality and regains a sense of the necessity that struggle survival, is not up for debate.

 

Now, I’ve been rereading Schmitt’s concept of the political lately, and one point that he makes about war. He criticises what’s called “just war theory”, which comes out of the Catholic tradition, and Roman law, which is basically what legally justifies a military action. Under what conditions could a war be said to be just or unjust? And Schmitt criticises that notion. He says that war currently be understood in terms of morality, because war is fundamentally existential.

 

In other words, war is not justified by morality. War is justified by the necessity to survive. That there is an enemy which is negating your way of life. And your choice is either to fight or to basically succumb and ultimately lose your existence in this world. And that’s the only ultimate justification for being willing to fight to the death with an opponent, which is that you’re being challenged to the death. Your existence is being challenged on the existential level.

 

So that is what is happening to White people writ large.

 

And so we’re going to have to develop a culture, a morality, a way of life that adapts, a politics that adapts to that environment, a politics which simply asserts our existential interest, our necessity to survive to the exclusion of all other concerns. And that’s ultimately why I am a National Socialist, because that really is the essence of National Socialism.

 

This idea that this world is a world of eternal struggle, the recognition that nature ultimately rewards those who will fight for their existence and punishes those who won’t. And Adolf Hitler himself said, like, basically, to paraphrase:

 

“Those who will not fight for their existence in this world of eternal struggle deserve to die and will die.”

 

And so that is ultimately the problem holding back White people is that when they look at politics, they look at politics often in terms of morality or in terms of this kind of practical desire, which is kind of the outward presentation, but inwardly as a form of cowardice, which is basically conflict avoidance:

 

“Can we all just get along? What is conservatism? Can we stop doing this identity politics thing? It’s freaking me out. It’s pitting one group against the other and it’s going to end up leading to conflict. And we can’t have conflict. Can’t we all just be individuals? Can’t we all just focus upon how we all pay tax and how we all work hard and we all have families to go home to? And can’t we all just existence pure economic actors, and not become political, not have identities, not be posed against one another in any kind of struggle? Because that’s freaking me out, man!”

 

That’s basically what conservatism is, trying to eliminate existential reality from politics and try and negotiate some kind of agreement of how everyone can all get along.

 

But the reality is that there’s not going to be an agreement as to how everyone can get along. Ultimately, we’re going to have to fight. All of human history has been, there’s two groups. Ultimately, one group’s way of life is negated by the other group’s way of life because they can’t both dominate the same territory. And so they’re going to have to fight over who gets to control it. And if someone’s going to win and someone’s going to lose and maybe one group is afraid to fight. So they cuck and subordinate themselves, and they’re destroyed by their own subordination.

 

[1:50:53]

 

 

And part of being a Whiteman, an Aryan, is that you come from a bloodline that refuse to cuck. An Aryan means to be a man of honour. That’s what Aryan comes from the word “ayah”, which means the honourable or the noble. We are the honourable race, the noble race. Meaning our race, never subordinated ourselves to another race. That’s why we have pure blood. Because we were never subordinated as slaves to anyone, and then bred with other groups and ultimately subsumed into some, like, completely different thing than what we organically are. No, we are a noble race. Our ancestors conquered. They weren’t conquered. They did the conquering.

 

And now what is happening is that we’re effectively being conquered.

 

And it’s like if you want to stay, if you want your descendants to ultimately retain their Aryanness, to retain their honour, to retain their blue eyes and their light, their fair hair and their fair skin, and the nobility of their blood, then you’re gonna have to fucking fight, to ensure that you’re not just an individual with rights under the Constitution. And you’re gonna have to fight to ensure that your people run your own fucking country! That your people run their own fucking empire! That’s the only guarantee of your freedom and the freedom of your progeny and your. And your posterity in this world is being in charge of your own shit! Running your own shit with no one else outside having the ability to come in and intervene and tell you what to do.

 

So that’s the Whiteman that is going to survive. The Whiteman who comes to terms with that reality.

 

So the only form of White culture that is really going to survive what is happening to us right now is the full Nazi mode, Whiteman! Which is why that’s what I’ve decided to be, and what we’ve kind of decided to become. Because we recognise that that’s the only kind of Whiteman that’s ultimately going to get out of this shit!

 

All the other kind of cuck strategies that all the other Whites are going to do, they’re going to fucking die with those strategies. Because all those strategies lead to mongrelisation, miscegenation, subordination, conquest, and so on. Becoming minorities, becoming persecuted minorities, losing control of the political system, and controlled by jews and other foreign interests, essentially over your destiny, over your countries, over your way of life, and the destruction of your culture, the destruction of your dignity, the destruction of everything that will guarantee an existence in this world which is dignified and honourable and ultimately your own.

 

So I talked about this a few streams ago. When we’re talking about World War Two revisionism, I talked about what freedom fundamentally means. I feel like that’s a point that’s really important to reiterate. That the word “free”, like, if you look at the Indo Aryan root, etymologically, of the word “free”, it comes from the same root, “pri”, I think, is the root in the Indo Aryan root language. Which is the root word that ultimately leads to the goddess Freyr*. In the Germanic languages, or in Germanic Paganism, Freyr is the goddess of love.

 

[* Freyr/Freya One of the principal deities of the Norse pantheon, the lovely and enchanting Freya was a goddess of blessings, love, lust, and fertility. A member of the Vanir tribe of deities, Freya shared her people’s penchant for the magical arts of divination. It was Freya who introduced the gods to seidr, a form of magic that allowed practitioners to know and change the future. Freya was gentler and more agreeable than the other Norse deities. Where Thor accomplished his goals through aggression and Odin and Loki resorted to trickery, Freya achieved her ends with the gentler persuasions of gifts, beauty, and sex. While Freya was often unselfish and helpful, she did have a darker side. Like the male gods, Freya had a taste for blood and fought fiercely in battle. It was said she took the lives of half the warriors ever slain in battle. https:// mythopedia.com/topics/freya]

 

And basically, the etymology of freedom and the etymology of love is the same in the Germanic languages. In other words, we understood what it meant to be a free man, to be beloved by the community. In other words, if he is a free man, he is a man that we love. In other words, he is our kin. He is our kinsman.

 

And so when you live in the land of your kinsman, you are given your freedoms because you are beloved by your community, because you are part of the family, you’re part of the ethnic group, you’re part of the nation. And we, as a people, give a dignity to all the members of our race, of our stock.

 

They understood that freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. No, you’re free because you are loved by your people and because your people make you free. You can’t be free as an individual in this world because you’re a social animal and you’re subject to all of these, you know much larger organisations of men that are composed of thousands and millions of people, and they will crush you as an individual unless you have an organisation of thousands and millions of men that will defend you as an individual. So your freedom comes from your people’s freedom. Your destiny is tied up with your people.

 

And that’s why ultimately, for me, race is the essential principle of my politics. Because we get out of this as White men or we die as White men, there isn’t going to be an alternative.

 

[1:55:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Good stuff. We’ve been streaming for a while now. We’re approaching the two hour mark. We’ve got a few Superchats from Rumble to go through. How are you guys feeling? You feeling like you want to continue? You want to start wrapping it up? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I wouldn’t mind asking Tom a question because I want to get his take on before we get to the Superchats. I’m sure he’s seen a lot of the discourse on this, working with other races, multiracial alliances, and people bring up things like:

 

“Oh, well, George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party went and sent their leadership to the Black Panther conference or whatever the fuck and they were willing to work together and Hitler allied himself with non-Whites and in World War Two and blah, blah, blah. And so we should look to make multiracial alliances.”

 

My retort to that is like:

 

“Yeah, I don’t actually mind making an alliance with Japan or with some other, like, non-White foreign country, if that makes sense militarily.”

 

But I don’t really want to be making alliances with non-White immigrants in my own country unless they are basically part of some project to move themselves back to wherever the fuck they came from. Then I’d be willing to work with them because they’re like, literally trying to get their people the fuck away from my people. But outside of that, I really don’t want anything to do with them. Do you think that’s too hard line of a position, or do you have an alternative take? I’m curious. I don’t think we’ve really gone over, like, your doctrine on this issue.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve used the term “defensive pact” as opposed to alliance. I think you can have a non-Aggression pact. Like, I feel like as a movement, it would strategically make sense here in Australia to not have any antagonistic relationship with, say, the Christian Assyrians that are currently the only other community in this country, despite the fact that they’re not actually White. They’re Caucasian, but they’re not European. They’re Assyrians. They’re kind of as White as Arabs get. They’re like the really White Arabs, and that’s why they’re Christians instead of Muslims, because they’re not as, like they’re probably closer to the genetic stock of the people of the Middle East prior to the Islamic rape gang coming in from Arabia. And they are more or less in line with probably 90% of what we believe. The only major difference is that obviously they’re not European. They’re kind of like 90% European, maybe genetically at best. At absolute best.

 

And so I believe in a non-Aggression with them. I don’t want to antagonise them. When they had that terrorist attack happen to them where one of their priests got attacked by the Muslim terrorist and got stabbed in the head, obviously the cops came down really hard on them and you know, attacked them and arrested a whole bunch of them out the front of their church. They’ve actually organised a lot of protests in Sydney as well. They’re a very large community and they’re very militant. They’re a very militant Christian militant community. I just wish that White Christians were as militant and as strong and as tight knit as the Assyrian Christians were in Sydney.

 

So that’s like an example where I don’t think it would be against my values to have a coffee with these kinds of people and talk about how we can defensively work together. But I don’t really want any alliances with non-Europeans. They can be the last to go back to Assyria or Syria. They can go first class. You know, the jews can pay for it. I mean, you know what I mean? Like, we can look after them, but they can’t stay here, ultimately. But I want to be respectful to them.

 

And then there’s groups that I have absolutely no interest in being respectful to. Like, I have no interest in being respectful to the Africans, the Muslims. The, I mean, the Muslims are a mixed bag in themselves. There’s a lot of different sects of Islam. Some you can be semi-respectful to, and most you can’t. They’re pieces of shit!

 

What else? Islanders, again, Islanders are a mixed bag. I try not to make it complicated to specifically ask the question regarding the historical take of Rockwell. I support almost everything that Rockwell did, and it was maybe more of a PR campaign to do that.

 

Also, he was supporting a group that was segregating. So it’s relevant to the politics of the day that Rockwell went to the Nation of Islam, met with the Nation of Islam, and it was a group of black people that were ultimately trying to segregate themselves from the rest of society. So Rockwell’s main enemy was Martin Luther King, who was obviously trying to desegregate America and make sure all the little black kids and all the little White kids grew up together, which is obviously, we’re in the result of that now, that dystopia.

 

So it makes sense to me to have a kind of defensive relationship like Rockwell with the Nation of Islam, to say:

 

“Well, look, we actually kind of want a similar thing, and we can get to restructuring America when one of us are actually, politically, relevant, when we’re actually in power. In the meantime there’s no need to assassinate each other. We’ve got enough enemies.”

 

So that’s kind of how I feel about certain non-White groups. It’s like I don’t want to go to war with them at this stage because my primary enemy is the traitors within the Australian government. That’s the primary enemy, in my opinion! The jewish lobby are going to do what they’re going to do, and they’re very, extremely powerful. But the primary issue is, as White people, we need a clean house. We need to have respect and dignity again. And I don’t think any of these conversations with any of these non-White groups is going to be from a position of dignity. So that’s why I don’t have them. I don’t have any relationships with non-White groups.

 

That’s why I think it’s ridiculous when people do. I think it’s ridiculous when, I mean, Rockwell had respect, Rockwell had dignity, and America had a lot more dignity back then. So it kind of made a little bit of sense.

 

And I won’t even open the can of worms, which is Hitler, World War Two, because we’ve covered that on stream before and we’ve extensively talked about the geopolitical strategy and significance of all the different possibilities of World War Two. What if he allied with this instead of that? You know, it’s just no point.

 

But before I hand the mic back over, we kind of skimmed through a bunch of things. I know we are coming to a close for tonight, but there is Superchats. I actually had on a list of topics that the Moira Deeming [sp]. I don’t know how to pronounce name. Moira Deeming defamation trial, 15 day trial has been going through the courts. It’s all over the media at the moment here in Australia, Americans will have no idea what we’re talking about. But we can go into it. I can at least give a quick rundown even if we don’t want to discuss it. But just quickly update everyone on what’s happening with the Moira Deeming trial.

 

[2:02:41]

 

 

Joel Davis: Isn’t it Moira?

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Moira.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a strange name. It doesn’t seem like a White name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know what it is, actually, but, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Looks like it spells Maori and she’s a part Maori as well. It’s quite a strange name.

 

But anyway, apparently she’s a little bit jewish as well. But that’s kind of irrelevant. I’ll just go into it.

 

So when we did the Destroy Pedo Freaks rally at the Parliament steps, there was a Let Women Speak rally going on at the same time. We were aware of that rally happening obviously. There were trans exclusionary radical feminists. So they’re like, second or 2.5 wave feminists. There’s a difference between second wave feminism and third wave feminism. They’re kind of bordering on third wave feminism, but they’re against the woke culture of what you could describe as, like, this fourth wave feminism where they’re accepting trannies and they want trannies in bathrooms and trannies in women’s sport and stuff like that.

 

Anyway, so they were having a protest against that. We thought it’d be a good idea to be like:

 

“Yeah, well, we’re not against trannies in women’s sport. That’s the least of our issues. We’re against trannies in general. Let’s hit the nail on the head instead of dancing around the primary issue.”

 

And because we went down to that rally, Moira Deeming, who was a Liberal Party MP, actually got stood down from the Liberal Party. And she was described by the leader of the Liberal Party, or the leader of the opposition as a Nazi, or at least being sympathetic to Nazis when she wasn’t.

 

And so now Moira Deeming, my understanding is she’s suing John Prosecco for defamation. And it’s a 15 day trial, and they’re going through all the evidence, and 90% of the evidence is just talking about us. 90% of the evidence is just like:

 

“These are Nazis. These are, in fact, Nazis. These are Nazis doing Roman salutes. These are Nazis on the Parliament steps doing Roman salutes. This is a speech from Thomas Sewell describing why he’s against paedophiles and trannies.”

 

Honestly, it’s a very interesting trial, and it’s been all over the news. And it just shows the relevance and it shows the dialectic. Like, it shows that we’re an unavoidable heavyweight in politics, despite our seeming irrelevance and minuscule size. Like, just being near us is like, it’s causing implosions with than the Liberal Party. And that’s telling. That’s telling. And these trials will set precedence. And it changes the dynamic. It’s a spanner in the works, a little bit of chaos, which I can’t help but feel quite happy about. I like the chaos of these rodent, rat, traitor politicians! I like that there’s chaos amongst them.

 

But they don’t know how to mentally gymnastic their way out of these associations, and they’re turning on each other. You know, one side of the party turns on the other side of the party because one side was standing in the vicinity of Nazis. Fascinating stuff!

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say that I looked up the word, the name “Moira”, and apparently it is of Greek and Irish origin. In Greek, it translates to “destiny”.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s an old fashioned name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I don’t want to slander a Greek name with negative, but I think it’s kind of like the Greek version of the name Mary, but also somewhat adopted by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Regarding, like, have you guys ever got the feeling when you’re talking to Muslims that you’re talking to like, a sleazy used car salesman? That they’re not being genuine?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think the reason I sense that from them is I was thinking about this tonight. This will be my final point before I start getting ready to sign out. I suppose. It’s because they’re kind of only geared to recruit or kill you and I wrote about this on Twitter at some stage or xdev, and I was thinking also about the word “convert” and how no one actually really converts in any true sense to Islam, especially not when you’re a White guy. Right? Because think about it. What are you converting? You’re not converting. You’re not changing into anything else. You’re still White with White predispositions. You still got these thousands of years of Christian or Catholic history behind you, probably. Maybe something else.

 

But the point is that even if you think you’re converting to a different religion all you’re really choosing to do is prioritize different thoughts and perspectives of reality, but physically, nothing actually changes. It’s just your ideas inside your head that are converted.

 

And so there’s no real physical or measurable conversion which takes place. Then I started realizing that Muslims don’t want anyone to convert. They want the to submit! You don’t convert to Islam, you submit to it! And Islam being a foreign camp, what are you doing when you’re converting to Islam? You’re submitting to a foreign camp, to a foreign force, foreign to your nation, foreign to your culture, foreign to your spirit!

 

And I think the Muslims are aware of this. That’s why when they’re trying to sell Islam as something that is desirable for you feel like you’re being conned by a salesman, because that’s exactly what’s happening.

 

[2:08:17]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, that also says something about the Islamic races themselves, that they’re all the descendants of people who submitted. Like they didn’t have the dignity to hold on to their older traditions or die an honourable death, but instead just cucked to Allah.

 

So really, like these people that are proud to be Muslim. Like, you’re a cuck! Like, the fact that you’re a Muslim, that your parents are Muslim, that your grandparents are Muslims, you know, it means ultimately you descend from someone who cucked and bowed down.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have respect for Islam only because it has like a powerful foothold in the world. I mean, you can’t really deny that whoever Muhammad was a significant character because isn’t it something like a quarter of the world’s population strive to live in his image today?

 

So you can’t really dispute that there’s respect there that you have to have, but you have to have that respect for it as a force that’s outside of your own camp.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a powerful force. Yeah, but it’s disgusting! Like, I don’t have any respect for it in terms on, like, a human level. On a human level, it is a religion for low IQ mongrels. It’s a religion for fucking sand nigger retards! Let’s be real.

 

I mean, the Quran, Islamic philosophy, this stuff is not very refined. It’s not befitting of a high IQ, spiritually deep person. And Muhammad himself was just a paedophile warlord. He wasn’t like some profound mystic or something. So to have him as your religious leader is embarrassing. It really is. So, yeah, I got no respect for Muslims. Zero, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t know that you were so anti-Islam, Joel. I thought maybe you might see eye to eye with them on a few things, but.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, there’s some things we could see eye to eye on in the sense of like there’s prohibitions against usury and throwing the fags off buildings is kind of funny.

 

But ultimately, you know, these are superficial things.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, good chat, boys. I’m glad we had it. I do want to move on to Superchats. We’ve got a bunch from Rumble, and I can’t see them anywhere except Rumble. So we can start with Rumble. Are we ready to sign off?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let’s do the Superchats.

 

By the way, some people send me some Superchats on Entropy. Entropy reloaded, and I don’t know how to pull them back up.

 

So if you are watching and you sent me an Entropy Superchat, I have one here from Grim Grandpa who just said:

 

“White fucking power!”

 

So I got that one.

 

But all the ones before that, like people sent them before the show started. And then when the show started, it reloaded and I lost the ones that were sent before the show started, before I could read them off.

 

So if you’re offended by that, you want your Superchat, read out please just send me a DM and so I can. I don’t actually remember what you said so that I can read it out for the on the next episode or send it to me quickly now. We can read it on this episode if you’re watching live. I know it’s a little bit boomer tech, but yeah, I just can’t figure out in Entropy exactly where to find it. I’m in the middle of a stream, so I can’t dick around looking for it anyway.

 

But we do have some from Odysee, so I’ll read those out and then we’ll do the Rumble ones. Gaelic Glory said:

 

“Moira is an anglicisation of an Irish name, basically of Mary. I’m an Irish buck. Moving to Australia next year. Can I become a part of the movement?”

 

Yes, if you move to Australia and you’re a Whiteman, you can be included. We do actually have people who were born in Ireland and have Irish accents and were born in England and have English accents in the organisation. And being an Irishman or an Englishman who moves to Australia is pretty standard. It’s part of Australian culture. It always has been, because that’s basically what Australia is. It’s just like a resettlement programme for Anglo Celts on the opposite side of the world. So of course you can be included as long as you meet all the relevant criteria. Filled Soda said:

 

“I say I’ve got catching up to do as there are some episodes missing on Odysee. I wish there was something like your organisation here. All those people died during the troubles. Now they’re giving it all away.”

 

Obviously this is another Irishman.

 

Yeah, I mean, there is an Irish nationalist scene, but there’s nothing really quite like us, I guess, as far as I know. So you can join your friend in moving to Australia if you want to come and join us as well. But yeah, and honoured to see that.

 

[2:13:02]

 

On Odysee I had issues with re-uploading after the streams, so if you want to watch the replays of the streams, check it out on Rumble. And now actually, I’ll be putting every stream will be up on Twitter, so you can also watch the streams back on Twitter. And you can also, if you want to listen back to the audio of each stream, you can get the audio which will be uploaded. The Telegram channel is basically T.me/JoelandBlair, and it’s just called The Joel and Blair Show archive Telegram channel.

 

If you want to catch audio replays, people like that for listening back at work, like, or putting it on in the background. And Filled Soda actually send another Superchat, he said:

 

“Glad to catch another stream live here in Belfast. I’ve got some catching up to do over on Rumble 1488.”

 

Yeah. So the same guy. Yeah. So catch the replays over on Rumble.

 

But, yeah, that’s all the Odysee Superchats. Blair, do you want to read the Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure, man. We’ll do the Rumble next. Is that what’s up?

 

The first one is from Jake Sake. Sends $2. Thanks, mate. $2:

 

“Thanks for fighting against the migrant brown horde scum flooding this great nation!”

 

You’re very welcome, my friend. Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends $10. Thanks very much, Fellow Comrade. He says:

 

“NSN have been labelled a threat to social cohesion by mainstream media, but they are one of the only groups actually pushing for real social cohesion.”

 

Interesting perspective. Everything is upside down.

 

Joel Davis: So it’s like when they say, … I was arguing with these multiracial alliance retards, and they were saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the jews turn us against each other. They turn the Whiteman against the black man because they want to divide us so that we don’t take down the jew.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Well, no, nature divides us.”

 

Because they were calling me a Fed or insinuating that I’m a secret jewish operative because I’m a White nationalist. Like, wait, wait, wait! Jews were afraid of White nationalism. That’s why they brought the fucking brown people here in the first place! To dilute the population and prevent us from forming a cohesive identity that can reject the jews.

 

And you can see in Australia, this is explicitly true in Australian history, the development of Australian quote, unquote, “multiculturalism”. Jewish community leaders back in the early 1950s, before the White Australia Policy was repealed, were saying this:

 

“That we in the jewish community are kind of concerned about how we’re kind of excluded by this Anglo Christian society that we live in. We’re the outsiders. And so what we want to do is we want to push for immigration to be opened up to other types of foreigners so that we’re not the odd man out anymore, because then there’s going to be a bunch of Asians and Indians and blacks and blacks, blah, blah blah. And then all of a sudden, the jews just are just one group among many and we’re no longer the odd man out.”

 

And then they pursued that strategy very effectively, pushing into politics, ultimately getting in control of the Immigration Department in the 1970s and opening Australia’s borders.

 

So there’s a really good article on The Occidental Observer. If you guys don’t know what The Occidental Observer is, Google that shit right now and go there. It’s a brilliant resource. There’s great articles there from a lot of really good intellectuals. Andrew Joyce, Kevin MacDonald, many other great authors.

 

There’s a great article on there and it’s a I think it’s like a five part series called The War on White Australia. It’s written by Brenton Sanderson. And that five part article details the kind of history, basically, of jewish subversion of White Australian society.

 

 

It is a brilliant resource that everyone who is interested in the specificness of the Australian JQ, so to speak, the Australian jewish question, that article is one of the best resources to kind of give you a good overview. I recommend you go and read that and check out that site in general. That will give you a lot of really good knowledge, particularly on the jewish question. A lot of brilliant articles on there.

 

But yes, no, the jew hasn’t turned us against them. We’re turned against them naturally, by virtue of the fact that we’re fucking different. They had different blood, different culture, different everything. We’re not supposed to be in a society with them.

 

So, yes, if you want social cohesion, the best way to have it is to have racial cohesion!

 

Blair Cottrell: Our next Superchat is from Mr Anglo. Sends in $5. Thanks, Mr Anglo. He says:

 

“Hey, lads, great stream as always. Take this advice from an English nationalist on how to view all Muslims. They are all just anthro-Arab jews, aka, they are just as deceitful but more thuggish and apishe!”

 

Okay, I’ll take that on board, mate. Thanks. We’ve got $5 from Jake Sake, who’s reaching a little bit deeper into his pockets this time. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“Who are the top three jews in Australia that are orchestrating the invasion of Australia by these brown horde parasites?”

 

Who are they, boys? The top three most influential, powerful jews in Australia. Who would they be?

 

 

[Image: Times of Israel, May 2018 – https://www.timesofisrael.com/5-of-the-7-wealthiest-people-in-australia-are-jewish/]

 

Thomas Sewell: Pratt, Heidler,[sp] …

 

[2:18:51]

 

Joel Davis: Triguboff*. He’s like, I think he’s now demoted to number three on the rich list. But he is the richest property developer in Australia.

 

[* Harry Oskar Triguboff is an Australian billionaire real estate developer, and one of Australia’s richest people. He is the founder and managing director of Meriton and is known as “high-rise Harry”. As of May 2023, The Australian Financial Review assessed Triguboff as the fourth richest Australian by net worth, estimated at A$23.80 billion, as published in the 2023 Rich List. Wikipedia]

 

And so he doesn’t just love immigration because he’s a jew that wants to genocide the White race and replace us in our own country, but also because he wants the benefits of the property market being jacked up artificially by immigration, or by immigrants coming in and boosting demand so that they have to build more high rise apartments everywhere to stuff all these pajeets into. And therefore Harry Triguboff’s company can come along and build those high rises with big government grants for billions and billions of dollars and sell them off a million dollars a pajeet box.

 

And then all the jews in the banks can then go issue even bigger and bigger mortgages to the goys and they can rub their hands together at the high interest rate.

 

So yeah, Harry Triguboff is scum and he’s one of the biggest contributors in political campaign financing as well. And he openly states, you know, his support for immigration and is massively supportive of like the pro-immigration lobby in general and has been for decades.

 

So yes, he doesn’t get enough hate to be honest. Like he’s this jewish billionaire who basically makes his fortune off the backs of the average Australian being screwed over by this perpetual housing bubble that he keeps paying off the government to exacerbate with more and more immigrants. And I feel like we should do more work to like focus some like collective hatred on this guy. Because every single Australian that’s struggling to find a house to rent right now, every single Australian that is getting absolutely raped in their mortgage repayments because their houses are wildly overpriced because of mass immigration fueling this perpetual housing bubble to the point of ridiculousness where in any major Australian city now, like, it’s almost impossible for anyone under the age of 35 to really get into the property market because of how exorbitant it is to buy even a shitty home in a shitty area. He’s one of the principal people that should be blamed. You know, his greed and his nefariousness and his lack of loyalty to this country is one of the main fundamental reasons, like why are we allowing a jew to be so fucking powerful in our country. So he needs more hate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Nice. And the next Superchat is from Wabo 84. Sends through $50. Thanks very much, mate. And he says:

 

“You guys made the ABCS 7:30 report tonight. Keep up the good work.”

 

Not sure how we made that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira Redeeming.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s always good to be on the news.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The next one’s from Jake. Jake1219, $10. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“Question for Tom. Would you say you follow a Machiavellian type philosophy? I noticed a couple of streams ago you welcome the catalysts of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m actually nowhere near as unscrupulous as Cottrell, but, … Look, he’s embarrassed. [chuckling] I think that the concept raises an interesting dynamic between winning at all cost, being unscrupulous, and being the principled dead man. And so being an Aryan is walking a tightrope, in my opinion, between those two concepts. I wouldn’t call myself Machiavellian, although I’d say I’m a realist. I think politically his advice is based on realism. It’s like, well, this is what you have to do to win! And I think that’s the dialogue.

 

But it’s not my advice. It’s not me. I’m a Hitlerian. I’m not a Machiavellian. I’m a Hitlerian. But I am very interested in the dynamic.

 

And as I say, I think the dynamic is a tightrope between not becoming Machiavellian and not becoming the principled dead man. I believe there is a tightrope in between that a leader must walk. Because there’s a lot of good guys that are dead. Well, everyone dies, but there’s a lot of good guys that die early. There’s a lot of good guys that don’t make it all the way. There’s a lot of good guys that have great ideas and great spirit and great character, and they are surpassed by people that are unscrupulous.

 

So I think it’s important to learn the Machiavellian principles. I think it’s also important to learn how the jews operate and how they’ve been so successful. But it doesn’t mean to emulate them. It just means to be aware of them.

 

But, yeah, it’s a very interesting question. You said, “welcome the catalyst of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters”. Well, I observe reality. I see what the system is doing. Maybe it’s a coping strategy. But I’m sick and tired of being frustrated. I’m just I’m fatigued. I’m frustration fatigued! I’m not frustrated at these things anymore. I’m not going to interrupt the enemy making a mistake. I think of these bad things happening to us are a good thing in the silver lining, in the sense, I mean, this is Hitlerian. This is not Machiavellian. This is Hitlerian. He says that all losses can be turned into a victory.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s funny. It’s a good answer. It’s a good answer.

 

It’s funny because I’ve had people throughout the years approach me and say:

 

“Oh I think, you know, Tom’s manipulative or Machiavellian.”

 

Or something like that, and I say:

 

“And you’re coming to me with this?”

 

[chuckling]

 

So anyway, next one is an interesting. Rimboard was Right. Who’s Rimboard? Rimboard was Right. Sends $2 and he says:

 

“Didn’t Europeans cuck to Christianity like the Muslims did?”

 

What do you reckon, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: It’s different because the Christians, this meme that the Christians are all forced to convert by the sword, it’s accurate in some parts of Europe, like in Scandinavia and so on. But it’s not actually universally accurate. Like, a lot of the conversions was like a genuine thing where people just genuinely adopted Christianity. It wasn’t like they were all forced to. It didn’t spread through warmongering, it spread through Evangelism to the majority of Europe.

 

[2:25:52]

 

Having said that, obviously there’s a lot of brutality in European history. I mean, particular sects of Christianity, like the Aryans, which is no relation necessarily to Aryan, as in the denomination of the race of Aryans. But the Aryans is in the followers of the theologian Arius. Arius taught, like, a non-trinitarian form of Christianity. A lot of the Gothic tribes, like, yeah, the Vandals and so on in the late period of the Roman Empire, followed that form of Christianity, which didn’t conform with the more orthodox form that we would know today as Catholicism. And they were pretty brutally, like, wiped out by Emperor Justinian.

 

And so it’s a complicated question, but I don’t think it’s exactly equivalent to Islam, because Islam really spread very specifically and directly through the sword with death penalties, basically, for not converting. They’ll come in, they’ll take over the territory militarily, then they’ll put a tax on you and oppress you until you convert. And then once you convert, you can’t then deconvert, otherwise you get executed.

 

So it’s a bit different. It’s kind of a more aggressively and systematically expansionist process.

 

Blair Cottrell: That subject leads us into this next Superchat, which is only little one, just a dollar from a bloke called, or someone called Phoenician Blood:

 

“As a Lebanese Christian, is it ironic of me to sympathize with your cause.”

 

I don’t know. Like, I have noticed that sort of personally, I’ve noticed when other races adopt Christianity, they tend to become more friendly to Whites for some reason. But I’ve never really had a good understanding of why that is because I haven’t thought enough about it to understand it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think you’re noticing that because the alternative for all of these races is to usually to be Muslim. So you get, like, a black Muslim, or a black Christian or, like a Lebanese Muslim, or a Lebanese Christian.

 

And obviously Muslims are more kind of hostile to us because they’re hostile to us on religious grounds, in addition.

 

I think also in with the when it comes to the Lebanese the I think there is actually somewhat of a racial or ethnic difference between the Christians and the Muslims there in general. So that could also play into it.

 

But yeah, if you’re a Christian Lebo, who sympathizes with us. Well, no, I mean, of course you would sympathize with us because why wouldn’t you? Like, this is clearly our fucking country and we’re being systematically genocided by jews, which you would, as a Lebanese person, understand why the jews are a problem. Considering the relations between Lebanon and Israel over the years.

 

My response to that is quite simple. Like, if you’re really that sympathetic, then why the fuck are you here? Like, get the hell out of our country. Like, you’re not really. People say that:

 

“Oh I’m very sympathetic. And when you guys win you can send me back, I guess, like, if you have to.”

 

And it’s well, if you really, truly sympathize with us, you’d get out now. We wouldn’t have to send you back.

 

Like, there was this guy. I told this story before, but there was this dude who was friends with a group of my friends who are White nationalists. And he was Sri Lankan, and he hung up with a bunch of these White nationalist guys for a while. I think he met a bunch of them at church or something. And he became so sympathetic to White nationalism that he literally did deport himself back to Sri Lanka. And then he established an organisation to help Sri Lankans move back. And now he’s, like, helping other Sri Lankans deport themselves back to Sri Lanka.

 

To me, that’s someone who’s sympathetic. To me, that’s an ally. I respect that individual. Like, he actually had convictions and he realised:

 

“Well, wait a second, I’m fucking Sri Lankan. Why am I living in Australia? I’m gonna go live with my own people and focused on making my own people better rather than living as an outsider, weirdo parasite in the country I don’t really belong in with dignity.”

 

I don’t want to live in a non-White country around a bunch of non-Whites. I want to live with my own people and practice my own culture. I would feel like a weird alien element. Really uncomfortable, to be honest, in someone else’s country where I didn’t belong.

 

So it’s kind of undignified. It’s like, if you’re a Lebanese dude, why don’t you want to go and live in Lebanon with your own fucking people? I don’t really get it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, this will be the last Superchat, I think, because it’s getting to that time where it’s 11:11. It’s getting that time where I’m about to, I’ve got to consider going to bed because I’ve got work in the morning. My brain’s starting to shut off. I can’t see how much money this person sent, but it’s from Land of the Fake, Home of the Gay. [chuckling] He says:

 

“Thanks for being based, lads. These morning shows are awesome!”

 

You’re welcome, bro. I don’t know where you are for it to be a morning show, but certainly not here. It’s getting approaching midnight here, so I’m ready to go to bed if you guys are ready. What do you think?

 

[2:31:27]

 

Joel Davis: Oh, there’s one more Superchat quickly from Truth Seeker 66 Degrees, who said:

 

“Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight for our freedoms, like in the USA. Love the show, White power.”

 

I don’t really know what you mean here by saying, “you not having to fight for our freedoms”. I don’t really know what that exactly means.

 

Like, obviously probably talking about, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The difference between the American Revolution and Australian Federation in 1901 being a different process, but, …

 

Joel Davis: It is a different process. But that was still a fight. Like, White nationalism was a political fight in Australia and federating the country. A lot of the reason why, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It didn’t require us to go to war.

 

Joel Davis: The British Empire went along with federation was because they didn’t want a repeat of what happened in America and they were concerned. I mean, those battles like the Eureka Stockade and so on, where Australian rebels raised flag and fought the British. Yeah, by blood.

 

[Blair leaves the stream]

 

Thomas Sewell: Night, night.

 

Joel Davis: But White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia. And it wasn’t as intensive as struggle because there was acquiescence from the authorities in Britain. And I think Australians being British, we were kind of quite happy to stay in the empire so long as we were given a certain amount of Democratic autonomy, which was actually granted, ultimately.

 

So I think if the Americans were given the deal that we were given, they probably wouldn’t have been an American Revolution.

 

But I don’t think that’s really why Australians are less politicised. I think it’s more to do with other cultural differences. I mean, one reason, actually, it was also that America is the most powerful country in the world. So, like, American politics kind of almost matters more because America has no kind of reference to an external, bigger country or something. Where a lot of people in Australia who are interested in politics, they’ll just consume American politics because it’s more interesting.

 

So you can have a conversation with Australians about American politics, and they kind of know what’s going on in America, sometimes almost, like, have more complex opinions about American politics than Australian politics, just because it’s a more interesting, like, media phenomenon to pay attention to. It’s more entertaining. Like, the characters are better. So that’s an aspect of it.

 

Additionally, I think because America has so many States and America’s got such an entrenched two party system, the kind of Republican versus Democrat thing is a lot more important there, and that kind of polarises the nation.

 

And also, Australia was pretty much a homogenous country until very recently. America has had the race issue, which was always a radically polarizing effect in American politics. And then immigration became a bigger problem quicker in America, where in Australia, we were, like, a 92% White country 15 years ago, 20 years ago. So, like, politics here was still the amicable dispute between middle class and working class Whites over tax policy and shit like that! Politics has only really become this kind of intense existential struggle that was highly racialised in a very short period of time. I don’t think our culture has really adapted to that.

 

Whereas in America, you’re voting for:

 

“What’s going to happen in the Cold War? Like, are we going to try and destroy communism? Who’s going to be in control of the nuclear weapons that could end the world? And, like fuck, there’s all these niggas, like, what are we going to do, like, what Mexicans pouring in!”

 

It’s like this big deal who’s in charge of America? Where in Australia, it really wasn’t a fucking big deal who was in charge. So I think that also contributes to it all.

 

But then also, I think you’d have to say American. The American founding stock were the Puritans. The Puritans coming over from Britain, who were kind of alienated by the politics at the time of the English Civil War and so on, where you have the Anglicans and the Catholics, and they wanted to kind of they were these ideological anti-Catholics, but also who didn’t want to acquiesce to the Church of England in many ways. And so there were, like, these political outsiders.

 

And so America was kind of founded by these kinds of political. This kind of political revolutionary spirit, and then they have their revolution and so on and so America’s always had this very intense intense earnestness, like, what they believe in, and they’re like, their principles in the world and so on are very definitive.

 

Whereas the Australian founding stock were a bunch of convicts, and the majority of us don’t descend from those convicts, but that almost like, has galvanised the country that, like the Australian people are kind of a little bit more rough. And it isn’t so much about ideological principles. Like, the struggle for Australian White nationalism was really just racism. It wasn’t like this big ideological battle about “our freedoms”. It was just kind of like:

 

“We don’t want fucking chinks here! This is the Whiteman’s fucking land. Get all these islanders out! Australia for the fucking Whiteman!”

 

That was really what Australia was always about. So Australia, in a certain sense, it didn’t have that highfalutin kind of ideological project.

 

And then like this civic education, when you go to school and you learn about the founding fathers and the freedoms that Thomas Jefferson wrote down in the Constitution and all this kind of shit! So Australians aren’t politicised for, I think, all of these reasons in the same way by the culture and the way that Americans are.

 

So I would say that would be my explanation. I know. Do you have any thoughts on that, Tom, wrap up the stream?

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Joel Davis: You kind of you kind of over it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s too late to go into. What are the question? Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight?

 

Fucking Americans! Like holier than thou! That’s their primary issue. Like what? How many Australians have they met? And they’re just making these claims on the Internet, like:

 

“Oh, well, the average Australian is not as political as the average American. And, it’s really down to the Second Amendment and the American Revolution!”

 

It’s like, you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. [chuckling] I could go into detail, but, yeah, there’s fucking normie fags in every country. There’s politically mobile people in every country. I can almost guarantee across the Western world, it’s the same percentage. It’s the same percentage of dedicated political activists. It’s the same percentage of sympathetic political agitators. It’s the same percentage of traitors. It’s the same percentage of fucking normies that just want to watch the football.

 

Joel Davis: But also, when Americans go on about how:

 

“Oh, Australia, you don’t have your freedoms like we do!”

 

It’s like we literally had a White nationalist fucking paradise where we had all the fucking freedoms in the world.

 

And then the British Empire got destroyed, kind of by you guys in your unholy alliance with the Soviet Union to destroy Nazi Germany in World War Two. And then in an aftermath, to decolonise the world.

 

So then we had to kind of throw in our lot with you guys, fight the Japanese and do the whole anti-communist, Cold War thing with you guys, and we threw in our lots with you guys, and then you all got taken over by fucking jews! And became the most cut empire in world history that loves niggers and so on with a passion!

 

And then you imposed, like, fundamentally, you imposed that ideology upon all of your allies in Europe and here. And our political system got infected with the virus that consumed your political system, and that is ultimately what’s taking away our fucking freedoms!

 

And so if you guys used your fucking First and Second Amendment to actually take down the jews and assert White American sovereignty and not cuck to all these other races and actually hold on to America, then we’d still be White nationalists, too. We’d still have our guns and we’d be loving it! It would be great! I don’t know what we’d be up to.

 

Thomas Sewell: Australia in the eighties and even the nineties before Port Arthur, you could go into Kmart and buy an assault rifle. Yeah, not every Kmart, but you could do that was actually on the store that in the stock of Kmart.

 

And another important example is that just because we don’t have a Trump doesn’t mean, we’re less politically active as a general people. The American politics is different to Australian politics. Australian politics is a halfway point between European politics and American politics.

 

So we don’t have a Trump, but most European countries don’t have one either. They have these kind of popularist, smaller parties that are slowly gaining and slowly becoming a sort of majority. It’s not a majority, it’s the biggest minority. They have these big minority parties.

 

Whereas, obviously, America, it’s a duopoly. Australia is in this halfway point. It doesn’t know where it’s going just yet. It’s between the two. And we’re trying to help guide Australia in the right direction, which is actually away from the American style politics. It’s actually away from the duopoly and more into the European style politics.

 

So I think that there are many European countries that are way further ahead than the United States because they have removed the first hurdle, which is the duopoly. They’ve already got that third party or that fourth party on the table that can start competing for power. And it’s a more mobile, it’s a politically mobile system. Whereas in America, you can’t do anything. It’s just party A, party B, party Blue, party Red, party Democrat, party Republican. And it’s the same AIPAC lobby controlling both.

 

Whereas in the dynamism, in the chaos of European politics, there’s actually room for a healthy. A healthy option to grow. There’s no room for a healthy option in American politics. So you might have the facade of a more political society because Trump is more Right-wing than the Australian alternatives, but you’re actually in a worse position. That’s my analysis.

 

If we’re really going to dig it out of me. My analysis, you’re actually further behind because you can’t actually do what needs to happen with someone like Trump and the Republican Party. They’re a megalith. They’re a behemoth in the way, an absolute behemoth, and it just keeps getting more powerful and more ingrained and more established. And it’s what actually needs to be destroyed. Like, we’ve got a chance in the next ten to 20 years of being able to destroy the Liberal Party in Australia. We do. We, like, give us 20 years. I think that White nationalists, I think we can destroy the Liberal Party. I think we can put the Liberal Party in the backseat.

 

But in America, you’re closer to civil war than being able to get rid of the Republican Party. But civil war will solve the problem as well. Fair enough.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well. All these Americans going:

 

“You Australians don’t have your guns!”

 

Okay. If you actually decide to use your guns and have a civil war, do you know how many of us are going to come over there and fucking help? We will pour in to fucking help you win! So, like, stop shitting on us!

 

Whichever side is team based versus, you know, team jew.

 

Thomas Sewell: The whole NSN just rocks up in a fucking black block fucking yacht with the NSN flag hanging.

 

[2:43:37]

 

Joel Davis: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because the government’s taking our passports off us!

 

Joel Davis: We need to make sure that the Whiteman wins in America so that we can have it like a better world for our race. Like, it’s so important. So we’ll come over, and the Europeans will come over and help, too. You guys can get a lot of reinforcements from us, so don’t be shitting in our fucking direction. And then because you’re going to be on the phone calling us up for help. So just remember that.

 

And secondarily, as well, I mean, I love Americans, actually. I love White Americans. My girlfriend’s a White American. If I have kids with her, I’ll have kids who have American citizenship and so on. I care about the future of America, and the future of our race is bound up with the future of America. So it’s important. That’s why I care about American politics. And I support our guys in America in a big way.

 

But Americans like to do this thing where:

 

“Yeah, oh, but you guys don’t have your guns. You don’t have your guns. You know, we got guns!”

 

And it’s like, but when are you gonna fucking do something with them? You know what I mean? Like, how bad do things have to get before you do something? Until you actually use them what does it actually count for? And I support gun rights, 100%. I’m glad you guys have them. I wish we had our guns, and I 100% support gun rights.

 

But it’s kind of like you can cope with all your guns, but you know, how many fucking beaners are pouring across the border? You know, look at what the crime. Look at your country is barely 50% White. It’s like holding on to your guns while everything slips through your fingers. Guns aren’t enough. You know, you need ultimately, like, a political movement to actually represent White Americans.

 

And, yeah, I’ll be rooting. I’ll be rooting for you. Is anyone in America that’s doing anything good. I’ve always tried to give my support behind them because it’s so important. I’m a White unity guy. I support all our guys all across Europe. I support our guys in the UK, in England in particular, big time, because that’s my ancestral homeland. But that is the most difficult country in the world to do nationalism.

 

So they’re fighting an uphill battle, but they’re still doing a lot of work. By the way, Tom, did you see the clip of Nigel Farage? He, like, cucked on mass deportations a few days ago.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Did you see that? Yeah, that was a shame. I’m not gonna pull up the clip.

 

Thomas Sewell: I gotta go to bed, I’ve got work.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you can go if you want. I’ve got a couple more Superchats coming, I gotta read, so.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you go through them.

 

Joel Davis: Good night, dude. So, Jake, 1219 says:

 

“Question for all, why do you think the English were so effective at dividing Scotland in 1297? Why do you think the clans were so divided amongst one another, even though they were part of the same blood?”

 

I’ll be honest with you, dude, that is not a part of history that I’m that well versed in. I apologise. I should probably know more about it. Have you got any recommendations, Jake? DM me any books you recommend about. [chuckling] Yeah, like 13th century British history.

 

I mean, that’s interesting. I’d like to know, but honestly, I’m not the man. I’m not the man for the question, I’ll be honest with you. Hyper lad says:

 

“Do do you subscribe to the specific meta-ethical position? And do you connect it up to your applied White nationalist ethics?”

 

This is kind of a bit of a broad question, like, do I subscribe to a specific meta-ethical position? I would say yes. Does the audience at this point want to hear me spurg out for half an hour about this particular subject? I don’t really think so.

 

I think I answered the question a bit earlier, though, where I said to me, this is beyond ethics. This is also ultimately about survival. Before we can even have an ethical discussion, survival must be guaranteed, our survival as a people.

 

But, yeah, I really do lean towards a kind of romanticist particularism in my moral outlook. I don’t like these kind of rationalist, universalist, egalitarian systems of moral rules. To me, the love of my people and my love of all that is great and noble, but my love of my family, of my blood, of my people. That’s really what guides me as a person. And I derive from the principles of loyalty and honour to that which I love and that to whom I feel obligated by bonds of blood. And that to me is really what defines what I think makes my life either a good life, or a bad life. How well, I honour that rather than the abstract ethical principles.

 

So yeah, to me, like loyalty and honour to your people and to, particularly to your family to your blood, like if you get married, you have children, but also to your parents, to your siblings. That to me is really like the essence of what makes you a good man, and your loyalty to your friends, like the people that you swear oaths to, that you’re going to be brothers and struggle together. To me that’s really what ethics is about is like how much you honour that as opposed to I don’t subscribe to universalistic notions of human rights or these kinds of things or get into like these Kantian de-ontological arguments I just don’t really subscribe to that position.

 

Yeah, I think that’s basically it for the Superchats. I hope you guys enjoyed the show. We got a lot of views on Twitter so I’m definitely going to keep streaming these on Twitter because almost 6,000 people tuned in at various points to watch the Twitter stream. But we still had a solid Rumble audience like usual as well. So I mean that just expands the audience of the show.

 

So yeah, I guess that will be the end of the show. Thanks for watching. Tune in next time. And yeah, just White fucking power!

 

And like I said, the people that sent those Entropy Superchats, I’m sorry, they literally refreshed. I’ll try to dig them out. If not DM me, I don’t want to leave you guys hanging. We’ll read them out next week. And yeah, good night.

 

[2:50:25]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee & Rumble Comments

top

[ODYSEE COMMENTS as of Sat, Sep 28, 2024 = 250]

@katana17
Just now
[Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following:
• Now hosting a live stream on Twitter/X for the first time.
• Recent activism and interviews, including one with a young Australian influencer/YouTuber, Max Caruso.
• They criticize Nick Fuentes’ views
on their street activism tactics.
• Argue for the importance of militant street activism to recruit and inspire supporters.
• The need for white nationalism and racial loyalty: “We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race.”
• Criticize attempts at political alliances with non-white groups.
• Discuss recent Australian political events, including a politician’s comments on Abo “Welcome” ceremonies.
• Argue that White people need to “stop White flighting and start fighting back” against immigration.
• Criticize conservative politics and argue for more radical action.
• The differences between American and Australian politics and nationalism, “White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia.”
• Criticize Muslim immigration and Islamic views.
• Importance of aesthetics and looking “cool” in political activism. “Looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics.”
• The need to appeal to women supporters.
• Discuss historical figures like Hitler and philosophical concepts related to their ideology.
• Criticize “multiracial alliance retards” and argue for racial separatism.
• Discuss the concept of freedom and its relation to racial identity. “Freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. No, you’re free because you are loved by …
Less

Rod O’Quinn
3 days ago
I’m glad to hear that Joel has renounced the church of Satan.

@OneTwo88
5 days ago
Yall gotta square away Tacitus calling German tribes, basically, niggers, with the way he describes their behavior, and then how whites CONVERT to Roman Catholicism and flip and build the best civilization the planet has seen.
Idk if Joel is some pagan larper now, but I was asatru before I reverted back to the ONLY FAITH and if you legit want truth there is only one place to find it. Everything else is noise.

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago(edited)
people like fuentes and logos revealed love talking shit about prowhites who engage in activism while they do nothing except intellectually self fellate

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago
when true strong white men take over people like fuentes and logos revealed must be punished for their subversive Jewish behavior and division of the movement

TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago(edited)
daily reminder, logos revealed is a subversive half Asian gay Jew and just another fuentes, same goes for tonitus, that spic dick rider friend of his

kybermancer
5 days ago(edited)
Informative stream, I learnt quite a lot.

NR88
5 days ago
You like Nick?? He IS a confirmed homosexual with OBVIOUS homosexual tendencies. His following is artificial and botted AS FUCK! The metrics have never added up. You know what else doesn’t add up?? How Nick was able to avoid any punishment let alone jail time for agitating and encouraging J6. This guy is a twink pile of shit who’s so terrified of vag that he literally says “having sex with a woman is gay.” Lastly he’s a Mexican test tube baby who frequents cartoon movies while wearing the merch (Minions) alone.

4
1

@ozarkntndaredevil
5 days ago
Anglo-Celtic Pride Worldwide

Earthling Carl
6 days ago
Real masculinity clearly terrifies Nick.

3
0

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
always a pleasure to hear their points of view. these men will make history, im sure.

Hide replies
TheLastBoyScout
5 days ago
i think they already have

1
0
Lampshade Denier
7 days ago
Fuentes is a faggot.

8
3
Hide replies

@ozarkntndaredevil
5 days ago
imagine having the resources he has and not using it to have the biggest family you can have. He claims to be Catholic but all the hardcore TradCaths have 10 plus kids. he truly is a faggot

1
1
Earthling Carl
7 days ago
Yeah, the pro-Palestine stuff was always a dead end when you have to ally with brown people who hate you.

8
1
rosco1314
7 days ago
Brilliant show again lads far Bonnie Scotland 14

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
gn Joel, ava good one

0
2

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
WFP

The Pork Report
8 days ago
GREAT LIVESTREAM, THANK YOU ALL! WFP O/

Randall_Waffen
8 days ago
𝙒𝙁𝙋!! o/

SovereignSaint
8 days ago
wfp

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
thanks for the stream lads o/

DOLO
8 days ago
o/

Lon Awfully
8 days ago
i think the only things we have is the 1st and 2nd amnds that we dint even utilize properly

1
0
danzimmons
8 days ago
we got murrican’s like multi millionaire Feduentes

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Australia is kind of like a testing ground to see what they can get away with in Europe and the U.S..

The Pork Report
8 days ago
In America, the Democratic Party has entrenched political machines in the large cities. They’ve been in NY, Philly, Chicago, etc., since the 1800s. They steal every election.

3
0
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
the cities are full of negroes who overwhelmingly vote left.

3
0
Show reply
danzimmons
8 days ago
^^^

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@danzimmons
He’s such a cunt. That recent interview…. Utterly spineless.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Yes he is & is also considered the best the uk has to offer

danzimmons
8 days ago
nigel the nigger mirage is the epitome of controlled opposition

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 days ago
American k-mart

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the uk is the new north korea

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
fuggn tellim big joe

danzimmons
8 days ago
the nigger worship is unreal

3
0
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
7 days ago
its like a religion

2
0
The Pork Report
8 days ago
True, Tom, there are a lot of lazy asses everywhere.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
what month so i can get me balloons ready

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
10% Partaaaaaay? We’ve been doing that for centuries

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Why no white community push’s for a month dedicated to them there worried that others find it racist

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
The U.S. is the land of the fake home of the gay.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
You chaps don’t have cockerells. YET.

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Who thinks Israel had nothing to do with the explosion in Beruits harbor?

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
Free of the brave

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Nons are parasites.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

@LandOfTheFakeHomeOfTheGay
o/

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

DOLO
8 days ago
Based

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
more cucked

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
they’re becoming more Christ like

DOLO
8 days ago
Arianism is like Gnosticism i think.

@SammichLubber
8 days ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
I concur.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Promoting a product to peoples needs at least 3 mass advertisements.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
if the carpenter cant have a house no one should, enjoy the dung huts and rag doors

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Carpenters can build houses but should they afford one?

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Overton Window.

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Return Triguboff to China. Apparently he was born there.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
nice

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
White history month = August On this day, 19th August 1934, the German public voted 90% in favour of Adolf Hitler becoming Fuhrer (Leader) of Germany, combining the powers of Chancellor and President, President Paul von Hindenburg having died in his bed earlier that month, in a referendum.

2
0

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
if u oppose the jew it means u’r helping the jew = if u oppose faggotry u’r a homo. retard logic

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago
https://occidentaldissent.com/

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Occidental Observer – screen shot

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
There’s a video going around of the joo who runs Blackrock openly stating they intend to fund ngos that bring in millions of nonWites into White nations.

1
0
Dawn Browning
8 days ago
1965 to 1970

Land of the Fake – Home of the Gay
8 days ago
$5.00
Thanks for being based lads – these morning shows are awesome o/

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the latest nigel farage clip

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
hope he’s not talking about the Burt Colucci NSM

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Follow FortyTwo from Ireland.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

danzimmons
8 days ago
the jew is running the world do to their backing of the three Abrahamic religions but im not converting to jewdaism.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
thanks guys o/

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Do paki’s want there kids chopping there dicks & tits off

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
IQ snob

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
the more gay we can make a country the more paki’s will run off

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
I had a Muslim from Morocco tell me that we’re all born Muslim and that those of us who don’t go to mosque we are apostate

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
we don’t need islam

DOLO
8 days ago
You’re meant to put allah above everything, even your own family.

The Pork Report
8 days ago
muslims are sleazy liars, all of them.

3
0

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
its a total cop out

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
They practice stabbing you when your back is turned here in NZ

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
ok this one time mate

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
I knew a girl with that name or very similar who I believe was ethnically Irish.

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago

@Sweet_Nerevar
haha, I’ve combat experience so I feel I could be useful

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Collett, JFG, Duke et al were mentioned in that case.

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
yeh theres alot of faggitry that goes on like that in the uk

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
but seriously u better not be a coke head formworker

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
fuk off were full. lol jokes

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
$2.00
Moira is an anglicization of an Irish name, Máire, which is Mary. I’m an Irish buck moving to Australia next year. Can I become apart of the movement?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
More

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
I have all the court transcribes for future ref.

DOLO
8 days ago
JK Rowling feminism

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Every time

Temulent
8 days ago

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago

@danzimmons
You have much more in common with your Christian ancestors than you do with your “pagan” ancestor who were defeated a millennia ago

danzimmons
8 days ago
White judeo crease chin’s would apologize to the muslims

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
reminds me of the mike enoch John fashcroft debate about working with others over seas

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Ik. Leave it for later, please.

DOLO
8 days ago
Rockwell liked X because he was a separatist. He didn’t demand access to white people.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
He won’t learn because he is a nefarious actor, his recent actions proved this.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
they weren’t in Germany tho

Vettekid1488
8 days ago

@danzimmons
Go off King

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@TheGreatWillDo
Not now, please.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Freyer’s day tomorrow

@TheGreatWillDo
8 days ago
Someone should teach NNR the purpose of street activism But saying that he don’t believe in free speech

danzimmons
8 days ago
epic rant

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Frei

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
fight fire with fire as they say

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

SovereignSaint
8 days ago
conq or be conqed white boy

Temulent
8 days ago
when it’s inescapable

Temulent
8 days ago
conflict avoidance, yes. relevant topic

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Interesting how slave ships have ties to NZ

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
niceness as weakness

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
kick their ass? scare them?

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
how do you fight back against a bunch of third worlder takeover of your town?

@AngryRetroGamer
8 days ago
“aboriginal and torres strait islander applicants are encouraged to apply”. Problem is, abos don’t work.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I’ve gleaned some great ‘recipes’ while changing my electricity, so there’s that.

danzimmons
8 days ago
the least the player’s could do is turn their back on the anti White bullshite speaker’s

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
I registered to vote as a black man in the past. Got funny looks at the dmv.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
I’m all for AFL Walkout.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@DawnBrowning
LOL “Thank you, please come again” the national slogan.

Dawn Browning
8 days ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Soon it’ll be “Welcome to 7/11 Country”

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Which is why we were dispersed in the 1st place.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
That’s (((democracy))).

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Been that way in NZ for over 130 years. All along the way policies no one wanted or asked for, rejected, implemented anyway.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
problem is they have infinite funds because they steal our money and give it to themselves, and our enemies

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
It’s not the indian government, it’s your own that imports them. And the fuckers have the gall to steal the fruits of your labour in broad daylight to do.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the jews are gunning for an end game. they are going hard and we have to respond by going harder

scoobyburn
8 days ago
kalergi on warp speed

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
it’s Camp of the Saints in real life

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
The new Student visa scheme is as bad as 20,000 Haitians being dumped in Springfield, OHIO.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
probably a few car payments

@SammichLubber
8 days ago
Morning fellas.

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
i dont even know if they bury their dead

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@DawnBrowning
The (((state))) invites them worse still uses our taxes to import them, and we have no say in the matter

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
meanwhile they get to benefit from the fruits of the white man’s accomplishments there

Dawn Browning
8 days ago
Most of them need to welcome themselves to country.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Likewise if we don’t welcome the chinks and pajeets…..

DOLO
8 days ago
lol

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
he said before cook for BC lol nerd

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
millennium of molestation

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
years*

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the 4th race…Australoids are the lowest IQ people on this earth

The Pork Report
8 days ago
Abos are a lower species. Next they’ll claim they were in Australia for millions of years.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
they say the human race has been around for 250 thousand to 100 thousand

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
doing what?

scoobyburn
8 days ago
BC banger

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
ima sent this auto correction to Madagascar

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
are why they made us Velcro bruz

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
I’m low IQ I can’t even tie my shoe

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
yeah lispy fags gtfo

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
nrl is perfect example of replacement

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
im just a bognat

Good Gravy
8 days ago
No shame in Wignat

Vettekid1488
8 days ago
Joel just described me to a T

Good Gravy
8 days ago
Oh God, don’t tell me you’re Groypers.

@CampsLindburgh
8 days ago
women at Nick’s rallies “who’s the boi?”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@deathcamp_counselor
(((women’s magazines)))
More

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
women will go with whoever appears to be the victor and hollywood has made the primitive ape nigger the victor

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
true ccg my misses punched me in the face to see if the stories where true, we now have two boys

@Moonman
8 days ago
men with watch collections

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
women are not the same creature as they were in the 30s and 40s

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Reduction is not reversal. Two steps forward, one step back is a jew trick. You will always hear about reduction of immigration, you will never hear send the fuckers back.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
a good joke has a element of truth to it

danzimmons
8 days ago
of course nickel Feduentes attack’s Joel, because Joel didn’t take the $500 N Bitcoin payments like Feduentes did

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
Wigger Nation supremacy

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@Mr_K_Ultra
“ignant” is from on Chris Rocks presentation “Niggas Vs Black People” where he incorrectly said ‘ignorant’.

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
no they just think were hot lol

Good Gravy
8 days ago
Well I don’t give any credence to what that closeted Mexican has to say. He’s a joke

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
but a term for white nationalists

Saint Amalek
8 days ago
I heard it was supposed to be similar to “ignat” which is like calling someone ignoramus

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
Women will put themselves in danger to find a man who will save them. It’s a sexual selection strategy that has sadly been exploited by those who seek to destroy us.

@Moonman
8 days ago

@GaelicGlory
Clann Éireann look promising

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 days ago
you guy should get some drone boiz to buzz around at rallies

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)

https://x.com/joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://x.com/b_cottrell89

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
3 % of the European colonists in America fought off King George’s army

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago

@sparkofspirit
Yes its innate for it is a necessary survival strategy of a species. It takes 24/7 brainwashing to subvert that.

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
real racism comes from the heart

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
That its correct

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
These white guys who are effectively deradicalization agents are just wanting to feather their nests and avoid risk… At the same time, willing to give it all away for security.

@filled_soda
8 days ago
$5.00
I say I’ve catching up to do as there are some episodes missing on Odysee. I wish there was something like your organisation here. All those people died during The Troubles…now they’re giving it all away.

@deathcamp_counselor
8 days ago
the more radical the better

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
Bob Katter

Secure the future of our people
8 days ago

Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1836716813633327448

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
catbois and dildos nick. so trad

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
“street activism is dumb, liking women is gay”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 days ago
If he’s a normal white american, america is fucked

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
Race first only answer

Gaelic Glory
8 days ago
Ireland is radicalising as well

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
it’s like that in the UK too for the most part

BobMatthews
8 days ago
ricans are psyopped

BobMatthews
8 days ago
we amer

@filled_soda
8 days ago
$10.00
Glad to catch another stream live here in Belfast. I’ve some catching up to do, over on Rumble.
14/88

@Moonman
8 days ago
he’s comfortable

@WhiteStrike
8 days ago
we created them already, we need to rip them back from (((their))) hands

@sparkofspirit
8 days ago
the only way we get the levers of power is create our own.

Ethno Nationalist
8 days ago
The system is failing

@WeWuzKrangz
8 days ago
they are going to frame you in the most horrible light anyway. if you are going to walk on ice, might as well dance

The Crucible 01
8 days ago
exactly ^

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
Nick doesn’t understand Australians and our Fuck Off We’re Fullism

The Crucible 01
8 days ago
gd i hate nick so much

@Moonman
8 days ago
He’s smug. I can tell I wouldn’t get along IRL

SmackUrApocolips
8 days ago

@Moonman
he appears to be struggling not to rub his hands together .

Ngrngrngr
8 days ago
thats kind of the issue… nick believes in working within the political system

Ngrngrngr
8 days ago
we’re never going to have political reform nick

@Moonman
8 days ago
Nick gives off slimy merchant vibes

2
1
SmackUrApocolips
8 days ago
yes , I was thinking nick was awfully snuggly with catboy .

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
who’s the guy Tom mentioned? Godfather of Australian nationalism?

scoobyburn
8 days ago
slag

@lewpers
8 days ago
When you have a bee infestation you don’t spend time swatting individual bees, you take out the hive. The hive is Israel. Swatting Palestinians is not a useful focus. Remove Israel, then mudslimes can go home. It’s not difficult.

Smokey
8 days ago
it’s a short video – 13 minutes?

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
okay thanks for the link. i’ll check it out later.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@Smokey
skip the first like 7 minutes. It’s just trash

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
thanks

Smokey
8 days ago
anyone have a link to the video?

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

scoobyburn
8 days ago
comprehension is above most people

Smokey
8 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
thanks

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
young Youtuber

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago

@Smokey
Max Caruso or someone

Smokey
8 days ago
Just got here. Who’s he talking about?

tropic
8 days ago
o/

@AngryRetroGamer
8 days ago
I see all they longed hair guys (Joel, Mickle, etc) cut their hair short after the Brisbane rally.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
The video Thomas was in mostly sucked. the first half was him walking around eating Hungry Jacks

@Moonman
8 days ago
hey guys

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
i

australian man
8 days ago
n

@TASMANIANDEVIL
8 days ago
first

@filled_soda
8 days ago
I’ve some catching up to do

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@katana17
Thanks!

@katana17
8 days ago
For whatever reason a few shows are missing on Odysee. They are all there on Rumble though.

@filled_soda
8 days ago
Is there no video of last week’s show? Maybe I’m missing something. Behind a paywall, maybe?

@filled_soda
8 days ago

@katana17
Thanks. I couldn’t find it

@katana17
8 days ago
Last week’s show:

Joel Davis – We’ll Talk About the News but Let’s Be Honest You’re Here for the Tangents – Sep 13, 2024 – Transcript

[RUMBLE COMMENTS as of Sat Sep 28, 2024 = 73]

Mike929497
1 week ago
I like Nick and Joel. if I had to pick a leader to follow it would have to be Joel though. Nick comes off as too weak and effeminate, although I agree with a lot of his ideas
23 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
I have the same thought brother. I grew up in the 80s. America had a brotherhood that is more expressed by the Aussies Joel, Blair & Thom. Nick needs to realize he was altered by Jewish subversion. He doesn’t have a band of brothers. Sneako, ye, Myron & even Tate do not count for they are “brothers” just as long as we are cool feeding them our White sisters & daughters. I hope Nick wakes up as he grows up. Hopefully he has felt the push back to the Joel critiques. We need them all. WP! -half Yank/half Confederate
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Mike929497
1 week ago
I grew up in the 00s but it was still a lot tougher than what we see today. we fought and looked up to masculinity. there is no unity without White unity first! WP
5 likes

kirodarkpaw
1 week ago
Spot on
2 likes

Washington88
4 days ago
Catboy fuentes is a fed
0 likes

PeterboroughLad
1 week ago
fucking jews
18 likes

ballsagna
1 week ago
Re: Nick’s silly homoerotic characterization of a “charismatic leader” — a touch ironic… Not due to Ali/Catboy past, but because: If Joel’s fraternal respect for Tom as a man elder + proven leader is gay… Please describe thousands of childless virgins who worship Nick + unthinkingly get every single opinion straight from his mouth (and laughably paying him money to be publicly mocked and belittled).
14 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
ballsagna
1 week ago
Also LOL at Groypers calling ppl like us wignats. Them: “Black women are fiiiine. We’re not racist we don’t hate black pp, we love everybody we’re Christian! Us: “Theyre all going back to Africa”
11 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
Well said Brother. I’m a yank/confederate from an earlier time. I straddle the Tom And Nick zeitgeist. Tom et al is right in their Chadness, Nick is right in his misfit atomized & cucked White boy-Man rebellion. Nick is intelligent talented, but he is still a student in ways he doesn’t even know. He was Cucked by our nation whether he knows it or not. He mocks strength training, diet wisdom and is surrounded by non-White “brother” e-celebs. I’m with Joel n crew. They are more fully White & Man than Fuentes can comprehend.
7 likes

solaro
1 week ago
infighting is a jewish hobby
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ballsagna
2 days ago
By that metric, Nick should get a kippah considering how many times he punches right + punches white during his streams. Guys like Joel and HT have responded civilly to keep the peace and he just keeps going. So frustrating.
0 likes

vigilantejustice23
1 week ago
Also, these guys who call you “low brow” come across as sniveling weak fagg0ts to heterosexual women of ALL class backgrounds, whether lower, middle, or upper. Does Nick have any concept as to how he and his movement look in comparison to your guys’?? They call you “low class” to deflect from the fact that they appear to be dysgenic freaks who are too physically and mentally weak to protect the women and children in their community. They claim they’re more “professional” than you guys, but I highly doubt most groypers even have much professional success – they’re just castrated cowards and pretend it makes them “civilized.” Why would any woman be inspired to procreate with THAT?! The groypers complain about white women endlessly because they have a slave morality, and it’s annoying – this is one of the reasons why they betray us for and identify with genetic inferiors like Myron Gaines and Tate. They don’t have an authentic White masculine identity or any dignity. Women aren’t attracted to these guys for a good reason. They’ll say it’s because of feminism when really, it’s their own cowardice and inferiority that repulses us. The fact that we’re not into effeminate boys who seem like they’re 15 years old is because we’re not lesbian pedos lmao, not because of “feminism.” Groypers resent nature’s hierarchy
9 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
Yeah, these are some valid points and criticisms of the groyper-faction. Ultimately, I’m grateful for whatever useful contributions to groypers can offer to the world-wide struggle of preserving our blood. Groypers tend to believe infiltrating mainstream GOP is a viable solution, and maybe there are some gains to be had in that approach, sure, but I moreso agree w/ what Tom and Joel usually say about how political-electoral efforts are not as effective as political-activism efforts of idea-spreading at street level and influencing the culture in contagious interpersonal sense. Politics is downstream of culture anyway. So even if groypers infiltrate political organizations (which of course, is still a good thing), it still doesn’t steer and influence the mult-cult poison at it’s source. And the source is how ordinary white ppl think in terms of their lack of sense of self and lack of dignity because of modern pop-culture, broken spirits, and dumbing down of mass-culture, etc. Street activism is more visceral, dignity-restoring, and epigenetic-subliminal in an effective lasting positive way. The active-club culture will also help clean up poor thinking and poor health among men, which in turn will reinvigorate healthy procreation rates and tangible quality of life for white men and white women.
2 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
Well stated. Nick needs to take a seat and learn. Perhaps he will continue to get back-stabbed enough by these “alliances” in order to find himself alone and empty so that he can suffer in order to break through his screaming ego.
1 like

cozydissident1
3 days ago
Nick doesn’t care about what women think of him, and neither does any great man. Your mentality is how White men fell so bad. Women submit to power, not men who desperately try to gain their approval under a system in which the power structure is opposed to them.
0 likes

EnglandAwake
1 week ago
I’m an engineer. I’m high IQ. Nick attracts weaklings and cowards that feel comfortable staying anonymous online “groyping”, in a nation with the first amendment.
9 likes

katana17
1 week ago
Here’s last week’s show. [Joel Davis – We’ll Talk About the News but Let’s Be Honest You’re Here for the Tangents – Sep 13, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/15/joel-davis-well-talk-about-the-news-but-lets-be-honest-youre-here-for-the-tangents-sep-13-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: • Recent Australian government moves on internet censorship and social media age limits. • Certain type of women being attracted to official positions in HR, government, etc., and having a particular appearance and manner. • The lack of discipline and schools where even in primary schools teachers are being attacked. • The psychology of leftists regarding envy. • Haitians being dumped in Springfield, Ohio. • Criticize a father whose son was killed by a Haitian immigrant for saying he wished a White man had killed his son instead. • The Swedish government’s plan to pay immigrants large sums to leave Sweden. • Express admiration for the Ku Klux Klan, calling them “true fucking heroes of the aryan race.” • Discuss Greg Johnson being gay and criticize homosexuality in general. • Talk about women cheating and social media’s role in relationships. • Discuss libertarianism and criticize libertarian views
on immigration and economics. • Discuss the Chinese government, drawing some parallels to fascism. • “Hitler was willing to, you know, he was a strategic politician, like any good politician, looking out for the interests of their nation.” • “Homophobia actually in, like, every. Pretty much every, like, culture ever in, like, human history.” • “Jews are probably the least homophobic.” • “We need the Klan. We need to bring back the Klan.” • “White people want things like justice and fairness and freedom and, you know, honor and respect and rights and liberties.” • “Haiti is disgusting. And again, they have the legacy of White genocide.” ..
8 likes

Delete
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah that was low of what Nick said. So called friend huh, but yeah I don’t watch him anymore. He’s not Pro White, someone who is Pro White doesn’t listen to monkey music, and isn’t friend’s with minorities.
8 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Washington88
4 days ago
Kanye west Kang
2 likes

BB12345
1 week ago
Nicky literally worships Stalin. His own admission. Check out his old vdo.
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Washington88
4 days ago
Because he received money from Kremlin and iran
0 likes

bigbuttwhole
1 week ago
Fundamentally Nick misrepresents and strawmans people he disagrees with, although that is a tactic everyone uses, it is poor form against fellow White Nationalists who are amicable with him
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
bigbuttwhole
1 week ago
In fact Tom straight up slanders and lies about Nick shortly into this show
0 likes

rg0dfrey
1 week ago
Joel is similar to a more manly more based more focused Nick.
7 likes

StreamAddict
1 week ago
God Nick is so annoying. Hes the one who started the first optics war and divided the movement up after Charlottesville. Everyone who didnt meet his standard of optics he would attack and then everybody divided on those lines….optics cucks vs wignats lol. Even Anglin, the biggest wignat sperg on the internet, jumped in on Nicks side and started calling everyone neo nazis lol…I couldnt believe it…like we all just wouldnt notice his complete flip flop.. Oh God and then the woman question thing, they then had to force a division over that too. And that weird fucker weev that ended up being a jew lol. I dont trust these people anymore, we got more gayops going on here than anywhere on earth, so I just assume someones some kind of bad actor if all they do is divisive shit.
5 likes

BillClintonBitMyLip
1 week ago
Thomas has the right idea. Just shaving it all off, Joel.
4 likes

Nickdorshimer
1 week ago
w joel
4 likes

mrwordsworth
1 week ago
Comedy is the crucible of all society, and that is why the Jews use it to their end . they have hijacked us through it.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
So true. Very astute observation
0 likes

Kroninn
SubSupporter
1 week ago
I appreciate what you guys do, I like that you’re serious. I’m surrounded by nons and most of the white men don’t seem to take anything seriously, but themselves. They have no ideological basis from which they navigate the world. They are subjectively minded, feminine. You walk the walk, not just talk the talk. WP.
3 likes

xSeparatist
1 week ago
Around the 30-minute mark, Joel raises a solid point. I have refrained from joining the NSN primarily due to my own limited resources, and I believe others may be in a similar situation. Nevertheless, I am committed to supporting the movement passively in any way I can, and I have full confidence in the abilities of Tom, Jacob Hersant, Blair, and Joel.
3 likes

AussiePermaculture
1 week ago
you three are legendary and inspirational
3 likes

AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
o/ I’ll gladly die w/ truth and patriotism on my lips than to perish as a subservient sell-out nation-traitor groveling to modern dystopia. I’ve got such immense respect for all three of you. Australia is a great nation, I love your guys history. It’s righteous and very colonial.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
StreamAddict
1 week ago
Id honesty rather see a movement like this in America than Nicks AF or MAGA. Eight years of this shit and its now gayer than ever. Trump talking about “bringing in a LOT of people” …but dont worry, it will be legal…This is why we have to be explicitly pro-white and open about why we dont want them here, we dont want them here cuz theyre not us and this is OUR country, not theirs…Thats it, its that simple. If we dont do that then we end up not having a real argument when they pull shit like this. Dont worry, they were just eating the local wildlife, not peoples pets, thats disinfo, glad we cleared that up cuz lol. Or like in the UK with the nog stabber….well actually, he was a “Welsh” Christian and not a muslim immigrant so you should be fine with the stabbing, he was one of our stabbers lol…fucking conservatives just have nothing to say to that in response, they just sit there dumbfounded like oh fuck how do I express that I just dont wanna live with these savages without actually saying it?
1 like

BradC1988
1 week ago
White Fucking Power! o/
2 likes

proloveantigov
1 week ago
My biggest criticism of Fuentes is his worship of the Catholic Church. Proven time and time again that pedofilia is rampant in the ranks.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Fuentes is more of an Americanist than Catholic. If he supports Neo Stalinist Jewtin Putin he can’t be Catholic. And its no coincidence that the JudeoMasonic corporate media never seems to attack atheists, pagans or Protestants ! The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Westerners pay the price of collective stupidity. http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/08/25/six-jewish-companies-own-96-of-the-world-1 (ie 96% of media) Everybody knows that the child abuse accusations on the Catholic Church was done by the jew to distract and deflect from the systemic child abuse by jewish rabbis. Why don’t you provide a list of convicted Catholic Priests? https://aresix.wordpress.com/2010/04/03/the-passover-media-attacks-on-the-catholic-church
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ballsagna
2 days ago
In a debate with Destiny, Nick admits in plain terms that he is not only a Catholic before an american, but that Americanism is heresy in the Catholic Church. Video: https://x.com/martinez_clips/status/1801903466027110744?s=46&t=Qk1ItwqItc7cmzxqf-te7A
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
Firstly, Martinez is a crypto Jew. Destiny is a libtard J$w. Fuentes? has lots of contradictions. Vatican II = Babylonian captivity. Vatican II/Novus Ordo = Babylonian captivity/counterfeit Church/founded by Masonic antipope John XXIII, Six Protestant advisors at V2 Council and KGB agents disguised as Orthodox clergy also participated! http://www.jesusmariasite.org/freemasonry-and-the-protestantization-of-the-catholic-church/ In 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt gave his famous “Four Freedoms” speech. In that speech, FDR set forth a vision for the reengineering of societies around the globe. The means was psychological warfare, involving the manipulation of ideas, words and symbols to divide target societies and convince these societies of the ideology that formed America. The most important society America targeted was the Roman Catholic Church. Media mogul Henry R. Luce, founder and publisher of enormously influential magazines like Time and Life, used the CIA’s doctrinal warfare program to turn the Catholic Church into a promoter of American ideas. This struggle reached its culmination at the Second Vatican Council with the promulgation of the document Declaration on Religious Liberty. Catholic doctrine did not change, but, defeated at the Council, the Americanists used their media power to win the battle over who got to interpret the Council with significant consequences for both the world and the Catholic Church, whose leadership came to espouse the doctrines of Liberalism something its leadership had condemned just a few years earlier. https://www.amazon.com/John-Courtney-Murray-American-Proposition/dp/0929891155 Catholics unveil Jewish plot – caused PROTESTant Revolution The Catholic Gazette (London) February 1936 https://educate-yourself.org/cn/The-Jewish-Peril-and-The-Catholic-Church-1936-The-Catholic-Gazette.shtml
0 likes
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
The Protestant Deformation in England by William Cobbett. https://www.exclassics.com/protref/protint.htm https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Influence-Christian-Reform-Movements/dp/1590451600 The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints. Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement. Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I] This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom. The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France. https://fitzinfo.net/2014/02/26/alex-jones-freemasonry-and-the-cult-of-constitution/ The J$wish Revolutionary spirit of America: Bastille Key given to George Washington https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/bastille-key/
0 likes
R9C2
1 week ago
Great analysis and breakdown of why NJF is incorrect. Continue to inspire.
2 likes

kirodarkpaw
1 week ago
Nick is a joke, you guys are the real deal. Thank you for giving me hope that we can actually win this.
2 likes

TTFOLEY19830608
1 week ago
I’m from UK and followed you guys online for years as we are going through the same journey for years now. I actually care about you lads totally.Nick said he don’t care about Australians (white ) sums nick up totally.he is anti white to anyone who is a real alpha nationalist and want a Monopoly on ideology
2 likes

PeroErcegovac
6 days ago
On the Indian issue I am starting to believe that the COVID lockdowns was either created, or utilised on time, to create the mechanism for the transfer of massive amounts of sub-continental Pajeets throughout the European world and her colonies. It is not just Australia suffering this invasion, it is all over Europe and her colonies from Lithuania to Croatia, from Canada to Australia. And all from 2021 onwards. Firstly, they create here in Central Europe jobs that never existed before due to the people not being lazy and having a culture of street life, i.e., Glovo and Wolt food deliveries. Then they bring over a slave coolie class of men to do the deliveries. And Bob’s your uncle every small Central and Eastern European country receives over 200,000 Pajeets in three years. You guys in Australia are to receive 750,000, Canada received two million… And every single time this is facilitated after the visit of a country’s minister or premier to India. This is not a coincidence. I know of a prominent Bulgarian NS who has looked into this and he believes this to be the case. Some food for thought.
2 likes

AngloAmerican777
5 days ago
I like Nick and Joel and Steve Laws and Mark Collett, Different people have different strategies and there are beefs that will inevitably happen but we’re all going against the same enemy at the end of the day. Cheers to all our people.
2 likes

AusFascist1488
5 days ago
Got all my boys onto your shit Joel, keep it up mate.
2 likes

ccharles1488
1 week ago
Joel I couldn’t even follow you on X cause it said sensitive content they literally won’t let people follow your X account lol
1 like

AllegianceMountain
1 week ago
1:00 minute in when Tom elaborates on how their public-street activism doesn’t require the flag anymore, even though said in jest, granted yes it’s true, point made, but i still affirm and insist the flags are still necesssary for decorum, signaling and the metaphysics of the substance of the thing
1 like

Irishman2023
1 week ago
Twenty twenty four. Top stream guys!!
1 like

fklmvjaflkm2
1 week ago
black bloc yacht is so funny
1 like

Gussmathiassen
1 week ago
Blair is always just pushing to end the show
1 like

BungusFuccbone
1 week ago
Women being interested in your politics is relevant because men want to get laid. If women hate the message and a man stands behind the message…she ain’t gonna fuck him.
1 like

RedFascist88
1 week ago
Tom drinking raw milk out the bottle is a straight white vibe.
1 like

evan1122
6 days ago
The nietzsche stuff is a dead end, I’m so over it. “Be a sociopath bro, it’s life affirming!” Christianity or nothing. It’s the white man’s religion.
1 like

CockTortureEnjoyer
6 days ago
I like both you and Nick. I don’t enjoy the infighting. He was partly wrong about the UK riots tho. He seemed convinced it all happened to justify a war with Iran and that Tommy Robinstein was a big part of it. Both of those were wrong. He should admit to that.
1 like

Motion937
6 days ago
BLUE EYES MATTER
1 like

ForOurPeople
6 days ago
This is why the Right never wins. Too much infighting (and government infiltration)! Everyone is always going to have their own opinions and ideas, but what everyone needs to remember is that WE are ALL on the same (White) side.
1 like

Motion937
6 days ago
BLUE EYES MATTER It isn’t just about culture. Race matters because Blue Eyes Matter.
1 like

ProvingNihil
5 days ago
Tom and Joel I 100% agree with you on what you both said at the end about some Americans, as an American myself you couldn’t have said that any better. You two were right on point!
1 like

14Ragnar88
1 week ago
Being a Christian of any brand and being a white nationalist is an oxymoron. Christians worship a Jewish desert wizard, pretend to drink his blood, turn the other cheek, think everyone’s equal and then cope by saying he was Caucasian when he actually wasn’t even real and he was made up to get gentiles to worship the Jewish god.
0 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
averagefreedomenjoyer
1 week ago
yep Christianity was designed to cuck Europeans mentally.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KingChun
1 week ago
If they manged to subvert the European continent to such a degree. Then it’s over, we’re not winning against a near omnipotent force than can mind control Europeans. Your whole argument falls flat when you realize, that this isn’t the case. You think the jews had some master god like plan for 2000 years to subvert the goyim. That’s comic book shit.
1 like

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
1 week ago
I’ve shared your thoughts before. Although I do think Christianity can be based if we want it to as it use to be. We could be like the Muzz where they say their religion is the final boss form of God. Christian’s has the same thought that Jews were stuck in the past therefore degenerate as they didn’t recognize Jesus as being God. Nick has a lot of Pharisees in him, like Christian in name only. I have hardly experienced the presence of Spirit in his countenance. I have personally felt and dwelt in communion with God via Jesus Love. It was weird, but beautiful and powerful. I haven’t perceived this from Nick. I don’t disparage his floundering stage of fake it till you make it. Pretentiousness has its place in learning like a child wielding a plastic hammer after seeing daddy do it for real. Practice has its place. Nick has to still stumble aka learn. o/
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
No banners needed
0 likes

Corkly
1 week ago
Yall tweakin in here. Like
0 likes

BossLurker
1 week ago
How many viewers were on X? I don’t see it
0 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
The first slaves in JudeoMasonic America were white! White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America White Cargo is the forgotten story of the thousands of Britons who lived and died in bondage in Britain’s American colonies. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, more than 300,000 white people were shipped to America as slaves. Urchins were swept up from London’s streets to labor in the tobacco fields, where life expectancy was no more than two years. Brothels were raided to provide “breeders” for Virginia. Hopeful migrants were duped into signing as indentured servants, unaware they would become personal property who could be bought, sold, and even gambled away. Transported convicts were paraded for sale like livestock. Drawing on letters crying for help, diaries, and court and government archives, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh demonstrate that the brutalities usually associated with black slavery alone were perpetrated on whites throughout British rule. The trade ended with American independence, but the British still tried to sell convicts in their former colonies, which prompted one of the most audacious plots in Anglo-American history. This is a saga of exploration and cruelty spanning 170 years that has been submerged under the overwhelming memory of black slavery. White Cargo brings the brutal, uncomfortable story to the surface. https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/0814742963?ref_=mr_referred_us_au_au TRUTH about the Irish – First slaves brought to the Americas – Forgotten History https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yljjCPOQf44 In the 1650’s 100,000 Irish children were sent by the English to the West Indies and Virginia as slaves. 52,000 Irish women, whose husbands had been killed by the English during the 1640s, were shipped as slaves to Barbados and Virginia and elsewhere. Most of the 500,000 Irish killed from 1641 to 1652 died at the hands of Oliver Cromwell’s highly financed troops. By the end of the British invasion of Ireland ..
0 likes

hueyvam123
2 days ago
Nick’s “what does Australia have to do with us” comment really clarifies his America First position. He’s not White first. He’s America First… including all the riff-raff that comes with that.
0 likes

katana17
1 day ago
Transcript of this show: [Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/20/joel-davis-the-purpose-of-street-activism-the-principle-of-race-and-the-politics-of-will-sep-19-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: • Now hosting a live stream on Twitter/X for the first time. • Recent activism and interviews, including one with a young Australian influencer/YouTuber, Max Caruso. • They criticize Nick Fuentes’ views
on their street activism tactics. • Argue for the importance of militant street activism to recruit and inspire supporters. • The need for white nationalism and racial loyalty: “We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race.” • Criticize attempts at political alliances with non-white groups. • Discuss recent Australian political events, including a politician’s comments on Abo “Welcome” ceremonies. • Argue that White people need to “stop White flighting and start fighting back” against immigration. • Criticize conservative politics and argue for more radical action. • The differences between American and Australian politics and nationalism, “White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia.” • Criticize Muslim immigration and Islamic views. • Importance of aesthetics and looking “cool” in political activism. “Looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics.” • The need to appeal to women supporters. • Discuss historical figures like Hitler and philosophical concepts related to their ideology. • Criticize “multiracial alliance retards” and argue for racial separatism. • Discuss the concept of freedom and its relation to racial identity. … more
0 likes

Delete
Huntercel
6 days ago
Joel, you should apologize to Nick
-2 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
RoseRock444
Supporter
6 days ago
Why?
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Huntercel
1 day ago
Nick promoted him, and was very diplomatic with him for months, even though he was mistaken, yet he just stabbed him in the back.
0 likes

Motion937
6 days ago
The reverse is true.
1 like

 

 

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Elijah Schaffer: You know, they say you’re not supposed to use the word faggot on YouTube, but apparently you don’t realize that that’s actually a frozen dinner out here in Australia, also known as a cigarette. We’re not talking about the other kind of faggots, which, of course, Harry Sisson and Chris Maury had a celebration party to confirm they’re not gay.

 

Okay, they’re not gay, but they’re really excited that Trump got convicted of 34 different charges. And they did a little merry jig to celebrate. Welcome to Generation Z, progressives. This is not gay. I want to remind you, they’re very straight.

 

Watch. Summer after high school when we first met in your Mustang Radiohead. And on my 18th birthday, we got matching tattoos. Used to steal your parents liquor and climb to the roof. Talk about a future. Like we had a clue. Never been a one day I be losing you, flirting. I love it.

 

And kids, that’s how you get AIDS.

 

Anyway, my name is Elijah Schaffer. It’s approximately some time in the middle of the night in the US. I’m very sorry about it. It’s probably some immigrant messed up a flight log in Australia, so the plane was late. Just kidding!

 

Joel Davis will be on the show in a little bit. You guys might know him. I guess he has a new description on his Twitter. We’ll be looking at that. He used to be a White representative or something like that. I don’t even remember.

 

But you know, the show’s gonna be bombastic! You know, it’s gonna be insane! Make sure you’re watching at Censored TV, promote code offensive, 20% off a membership or watching on Rumble because I can guarantee you this video is going to get pulled from YouTube. We’ll see you in just a few moments.

 

Brian. Let’s start the show.

 

[02:52]

 

I remember what it was. A White advocate. Joel Davis, welcome back to Slightly Offensive.

 

Joel Davis: Hey, nice to be here.

 

Now, I’m, according to Twitter, I’m a mass deportations enthusiast.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Oh, yeah. Can I okay, so let’s talk about those at.

 

Joel Davis: There’s a swastika at the end as well.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Because can we go to that? Let me see if we can bring this up here. So here’s your Twitter. Joel Davis. You know, people are not gonna like this episode. You already knew ahead of time. Right-wing Watch, Media Matters, Angry White Men, whatever these bitches are, they’re watching this and they’re ready to kill me.

 

Joel Davis: Some of my biggest fans.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Have anything to say to them?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah. Thanks for the promotion. One day we’re going to win, and then it’s over for you. So, …

 

Elijah Schaffer: What about any Drew Pavlou? It’s been a while since you’ve been on. Last time you were on, we had a debate. You guys should watch it. You were on with Drew. He’s Greek or Turkish or something. Did anything happen to that? Have you guys made up after that event?

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t say made up. I mean, he was very friendly, real life. Remember after the debate, he was acting like he was my friend.

 

And then he took to Twitter and spent the next week compulsively tweeting about how I’m a psychopath. One of my favorite of his descriptions of me was he was. He said that I had dead eyes, the eyes of a killer, and predicted that I would commit a terrorist attack at some point in the future. I took that as a compliment, to be honest.

 

But, you know, yeah, Drew is a pathetic faggot.

 

And also, I want to thank him for debating me, because he did such a horrible job. He really just kind of set me up to take a big victory. I mean, everyone was just watching that debate to watch me. No one was watching it. There’s no Drew Pavlou fans.

 

So, you know, he was just a whipping boy. He was a punching bag, and he did a very good job of being a punching bag. And, yeah, his narcissistic meltdown on Twitter was also really entertaining. So I had the popcorn out for that quite a few days afterwards. So that was fun.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah.

 

And I think if you can go back to the screen here on your Twitter. I’m happy to have you back, because, again, you were a White advocate. Now you’re going by “Mass Deportations Enthusiast”. And you have a swastika there at the end of your description. To a lot of people, that would be considered quite offensive. Maybe just slightly.

 

A lot of people are very upset by that. Is that an ode to some sort of an Indian custom? Because I know Australia has become sort of an Indian colony in the last several years. So what’s up with that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, Hinduism was created by my ancestors, the Aryans. We ran India. We ran India twice, actually. We ran India originally, we wrote the Vedas. Hinduism is our creation. Then a bunch of us left, went to Europe, the ones who remained mixed, bred with the Dravidians and turned into, you know how there’s some caramel milk chocolate variations in the Indian caste system, so there’s different gradations.

 

So, unfortunately, there’s no proper Aryans left in India, only the ones who went to Germany and so on survived. But the swastika is the symbol of our people. And it’s, in fact, all over Europe. It’s not just in India. You can see in many churches, many old Roman buildings.

 

I mean, even in Australia, there’s swastikas in buildings all over the place here, all over England. I’ve driven past just random churches in England. And this is like a swastika that was the Church was built hundreds of years ago. It’s an ancient symbol.

 

[06:24]

 

And as I said, it’s a symbol of our people. Everywhere that Aryans have gone, this symbol has gone with us. It represents our unique form of spirituality. It represents who we are as a people.

 

So that’s why I use it. And that’s also the same reason why Hitler used it. He didn’t invent the swastika.

 

And when Indians use it’s kind of cringe because it’s not really supposed to be for them. But they’re using our whole religion, but they don’t practice it properly. And that’s kind of the case whenever non-Whites practice any of our religions. They can’t practice Christianity properly. They can’t practice any religions properly that we create, because they’re an expression of who we are, our unique spirituality.

 

The reason why I changed it to “a mass deportations enthusiast” is because, you know, yes, I am a White identitarian, I am a White advocate.

 

But I think the more pertinent issue is getting all of these non-Whites out of our country. I think that’s the real active principle. Like, yes, I stand for White people, but there’s some people who stand for White people in a safer way. They stand for White people:

 

“Oh, there’s anti-White discrimination.”

 

And people like Matt Walsh will talk about the anti-White discrimination and the double standard. But they don’t want to talk about how we’re going to actually solve the problem, because if we allow the current situation to continue, we’re going to become like India. We’re going to get mixed bred over the generations, and we’ll all be different gradations of brown and the essence of who we are will be lost forever. No, they need to get out! We need to make, … And they’re not going to leave unless we make them leave.

 

I kind of represent a more forceful, I guess, position. You know, a lot of Europeans, …

 

Elijah Schaffer: Starting out lightly here. It’s like:

 

“Hey, everyone, meet Joel Davis. Hi! I have a swastika on my profile, and I want non-White people out of my country!”

 

This [chuckling] is pretty much summarizing. This is the real you, though, right? This is obviously not an act. This is not a joke. You really believe this stuff. Just to clarify to people in the audience, this is like a real platform, correct?

 

Joel Davis: Obviously.

 

I think you believe it, too. You want them out.

 

Elijah Schaffer: So [chuckling] that crazy Drew Pavlou particularly. He could be the first one. No, I’m kidding! He’s actually coming back on the show. I want to be kind to Drew. He’s coming back on the show in Florida. He’s going to be in America, which I’m really, … You’re welcome to come to America, too. You’re invited. Because I don’t think Australia likes you. I don’t think the government here. I think the people like you. I think that there’s a lot of people that think like you.

 

I think there’s more people in the country that share your views on the world, but they’ve been trained. Some might call it “buck broken”, depending on which culture you’re from, into White men have been broken to thinking that it is a hateful ideology to preserve your heritage, to preserve your future, and to look out for your country.

 

I know right now in Germany, we’re gonna look at a story. I wanna get right in this with you, particularly that the last week the German government has spent time trying to investigate White men for singing the song Auslander Raus. You’ve heard about that, the “Foreigners Out”?

 

Joel Davis: I’ve listened to this song about 1, 400 times this week.

 

Elijah Schaffer: All right, [chuckling] we’re going there!

 

All right, but I want to say this.

 

So again, this is what’s probably going to get the show pulled. It’s not even anything we’ve said. It’s the fact that I’m going to show a video. YouTube is gay, so make sure you go to Rumble, make sure you go to Censored, make sure you’re supporting there.

 

While they were doing that, here’s a longer video. There was a stabbing in Germany of a Muslim. And this is a really interesting discussion because you talked about getting. I didn’t want to cut you off there, but you were talking about getting non-White people out. And this ideology, and this brings up a very interesting conversation. Something important that we’ll talk about.

 

I want to play this video of this Muslim guy who stabbed a Muslim critic in Mannheim, Germany.

 

Before we talk about that, though, I do want to talk about something very important, which is a huge shout out to our sponsor for today.

 

[10:18]

 

 

Following Transcript Quality = 3.5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

 

We’re talking about undertak boxers, guys here’s something really important. You can go to the website, get 10% off, but if you use my promote code offensive 20, you get 20% off. These are the most amazing boxer briefs for several reasons.

Number one, they wick away moisture. So I like that. It’s about to be summer. You want to make sure you have briefs on that are not getting all humid and gross. They’re extremely breathable. They’re made with modal, which is like cotton on steroids. They have a perfect elastic waistband that doesn’t lose elasticity. They don’t wear out.

 

And I always say my favorite part is they don’t ride up. Their battle force is tested, so they don’t get your junk in a bunch. And the best part is, too, is like, I know this might be weird, but, like, my wife will wear my boxers or something to bed or whatever. Some girls like briefs. You don’t even have to be a guy to wear these to bed. They’re absolutely comfortable. And on the good note, they make you look good, too.

 

So if you want your wife to think you’re sexy, whatever you want, that’s great! They look great on you. She’ll love them. They’re not weird. They also have this. Kez always likes it, too.

 

I’m just going to say this because they have a front. It’s called a front pocket, and it can open very quickly.

 

So they’re very, very handy if you have to go pee or anything like that. But check out the website, undertak.com dot. You can also get clothing from them as well, including socks, which are extremely comfortable. Their shirt, I gave one to Ben. Ben’s in the studio. But Ben, you have one of their T-shirts, very comfortable. Yeah, you can hear them. All right. So check it out. Go to undertak.com, undertac.com, comma, promote code offensive 20. Get 20% off. This company is a veteran owned company, and they donate a portion of the profits to fighting human trafficking with children, which is amazing! Check it out today and support them. Get a pair. Get a spare and support. The shows were demonetized everywhere@undertak.com. Comma promote code offensive 20.

 

My guest today is Joel Davis, mass deportation enthusiast, Hindu supporter. He’s a Hindu, apparently. And we’re talking about the story of going on of the Auslander Rouse song, which means “foreigners out” being made illegal, banned at Oktoberfest pretty much everywhere.

 

And while White countries are fighting against White people trying to protect their countries, here’s a little bit of what’s actually happening in Germany. This is actually all too common. Check this out. All right. There’s a lot going on here, Joel. There’s a lot going on here.

 

Joel Davis: There’s a lot to unpack.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, let’s go back to.

 

Let’s start in the very beginning. Let’s just unpack what’s happening here. I’m familiar. Are you familiar with what was going on here?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So, I’m sorry, I can’t remember the individual that was being targeted, but I know that he is probably. He’s a prominent anti-Israel. Sorry, not anti-Israel. He’s a pro-Israel, anti-Islam activist. I don’t think you and I would probably be his biggest fan due to the fact that he is so vociferously pro-Israel.

 

But of course, I think everyone is familiar with this form of politics. It’s common in the Anglo sphere as well, where like a Tommy Robertson style, where you just talk about how horrible Muslims are all the time and how great jews are all the time and how great everyone who isn’t Muslim is. It’s just the Muslims that are the problem. The counter jihad political paradigm. He’s one of these guys.

 

Anyway, so then he’s doing some kind of public event.

 

And obviously a Muslim is upset about the fact that he is an anti-Islam campaigner, probably against Islamic immigration, probably against building mosques, that kind of thing. He probably pushes for. And so he’s attacked him and tried to stab him and his buddies. To be fair, his buddy showed valor. They didn’t run away. They’re trying to tackle this guy and restrain this guy even though he’s swinging the knife at them. So they showed some balls. They showed. But the police, they seem extremely slow to react.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: When they do react through, that reaction is crazy!

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay, so the guy right here is. This guy is the if you guys can see my cursor on the screen, this is the attacker, right? I think this is this the guy he’s going after? Right in the blue here? I’m pretty sure that’s who he’s going after, cuz, like, he’s, like, targeting him. Right?

 

Joel Davis: He stabbed this other guy in the leg as well. That guy? No, I don’t think that guy. I think that might be his friend. I’m not sure.

 

So the guy in the other guy, the other guy in the blue jacket is like, grabbing his leg like it’s bleeding.

 

Elijah Schaffer: And, you know what’s funny is that critics of this show will have more problem with you being on the show than with a Muslim guy stabbing people in Germany. Like, that’s the state of the country in our nations. Like, Joel Davis was on the show. Like, hey, people are getting stabbed.

 

Joel Davis: See here, the police officer seemed to have more problem with the guy trying to hold the guy with the knife down than the guy swinging a knife to the point.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay, so he’s.

 

And by the way, this is not like, this is a something I want to point out is the vitriol in the attacker. Right. This isn’t just like you’re fighting and somebody just shakes you. Right? This guy is trying to kill him. Yeah. He’s attempting murder. And this is definitely not a small shank. This can easily cut an artery, kill you. So shout out to the cameraman for some reason for filming.

 

Joel Davis: This cameraman goes hard. Yeah, he’s like, he gets bumped. At one point, I was like, this guy, he lives for the content.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. I was like, this is me literally on the field. Like, people are getting shot. I’m just like, I gotta get this on footage.

 

So this guy is stabbing. You can see the blood, Brian. Yeah. When this stream is done, we’re gonna have to delete this media off YouTube or we’re gonna get a massive strike for the violence. Thank God for Rumble and censored for allowing us to show Muslims acting like Muslims.

 

And so this guy, his what?

 

So his friends trying to restrain him, get the knife off him. Right? Is that what’s going on here? And he gets up.

 

So the police are on the scene already?

 

[16:19]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s heaps of them too. And they’ve got guns out and they haven’t shot yet.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. Okay, well, so let’s talk about that with modern policing. Why of the police? Are the police hesitant to act because he’s a minority? Is it because it’s just the law in Germany about the has to be, like, a sure use of lethal force? Is this because they’ve been instructed to stand down on, like, targeting Muslims? What do you think’s going on here? Why is there like a three or four second delay?

 

Joel Davis: There’s definitely. Well, a bunch of them are women, so that’s already explanatory for their inaction.

 

But then also the people that are the victims here are the supposed bad guys, the horrible racists.

 

And obviously they have been conditioned and trained with a Leftist ideology. Obviously in Germany in particular, they’ll be very afraid of any police showing sympathies to the Right-wing for obvious reasons.

 

So these people have been programed with Left-wing ideology. They’ve been programed that the bad guy is always the White guy. And they don’t actually properly enforce the law when it comes to crime committed by these immigrants, these non-White immigrants in Germany. Like, we see this across the West, double standard in policing.

 

So they’ve been trained to be inactive. You’ve got women also. I think, to be fair, it’s probably hard to find the shot because there’s people falling all over everyone.

 

So they’re probably nervous to pull the trigger because you wouldn’t want to shoot the wrong guy. And they probably don’t want to make the shot, you know, they don’t want to kill someone, probably.

 

So there’s a various set of reasons for the apprehensiveness, but these guys are supposed to be professionals.

 

And you see this guy pulls out the gun here.

 

Elijah Schaffer: So, like, this per, this cop has no gun out.

 

Joel Davis: I want to break his holster.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, this episode is called, like, is the weapon here?

 

Joel Davis: This guy doesn’t get stabbed.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, that’s what I was gonna say. It’s like this is so, by the way, this.

 

Joel Davis: Why is he tackling the other dude? That’s what’s crazy!

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay, thank you. Because this is sort of what I was reminding somebody. I said, they’re like, what do you mean the West is falling? I go, well, like, Russia’s still around even though the USSR fell. I go, it’s not that the countries are necessarily going to completely disappear. When I start saying it’s falling, it’s like your police don’t have their guns drawn while there’s an active stabbing going on, because. And you don’t even know why. And you, but you can think of several reasons. Like, either they’re cucked or they’re trained not to, or we don’t have law and order, or they’re afraid of getting sued or for discrimination. Like, I don’t care.

 

The point is, you can think of a reason why they wouldn’t have drawn their guns. And it makes sense because they’re women. I don’t really care.

 

But there’s a reason.

 

And so the explanation is they don’t have their guns out. So an active stabber, which we’re gonna see here, is able to stab a police officer, an additional victim. But that’s what I want to ask you.

 

Joel Davis: The one girl, one grill Max chad cop that actually has the balls to do something his programing kicks in, and he tackles the victim, who’s trying to hold this guy down because he’s the racist. He must be the bad guy. And he ends up getting stabbed. I don’t know what. Like, exactly what happened, but he’s getting stabbed, like, in the neck or maybe his ears been cut off.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, it’s like, freeze, trouble. But why did he tackle the one of the victims? That’s what I’m trying to. Like, why did this cop.

 

Joel Davis: It’s crazy!

 

Elijah Schaffer: Like, I don’t understand that. So, like, I’m trying to get what’s going on here. So he attacks, tackles the victim. I guess he got confused.

 

And then that guy gets, like, his ear sliced, and this guy’s barely drawing his gun right there. How many.

 

Joel Davis: Look at these women. Look at the look at the body position of these women and this other cuck police officer in the background.

 

And by the way, these police, these male police officers, they don’t look like Germans. The women look like Germans. The men, they look like they’re Turks themselves.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, and why did this guy not grab his gun? Why did he not. I’m trying to understand where this officer that’s kneeling down, why his.

 

Joel Davis: Guns know, he thinks the Whiteman is beating up the brown guy for no reason and probably doesn’t even realize that he has a knife.

 

[20:12]

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, let’s see that. The time lapse between this this is already from right here, from when this guy’s stabbing these people. We’re talking about a ten second delay. Then he stabs him. So watch this. Boom!

 

So this is what the fall of the West is. He’s stabbing him through his plates.

 

I would say that the Kevlar probably saved his life because it probably took some of the force, the blow.

 

So the knife probably didn’t go in as deep.

 

But then now this guy has his gun drawn and he fires. I don’t know how much clear of a shot you could have. You’ve got to be really bad at that close of range.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: To not be able to make that shot is pretty significant.

 

Also, notice people in the background just walking around like it’s a cat. Like they’re not.

 

Joel Davis: Like it was another day.

 

Elijah Schaffer: It’s not alarming to them that the people are getting stabbed in the middle. Like, people are just sitting around watching this like it’s a Tuesday.

 

Joel Davis: And also, if you watch the full. This is the shortened length of the clip. I watched the full length one where it shows some of the aftermath. And they’re so slow to go and attend to the guys in the blue jackets that have been stabbed or blue Hoodies or whatever that have been stabbed. It’s like:

 

“Oh, the racists that got stabbed, whatever.”

 

And they meander over, like, a couple minutes later, like, if they hit a major artery, that two minutes is the difference between life and death. And they show absolutely, like, no concern that these people could be dying on the fucking side of the road.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. And I think. Think the crate. The craziest part is. I didn’t see the whole clip then, but the craziest part is like, look at how many more cops are here and they’re not doing anything. They’re like, their guns are not drawn.

 

Joel Davis: Women. They’re all women. And only White cops are women. Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah.

 

And so this. Well, this brings up the interesting question, because, you know how many cops it take to screw in a light bulb? I don’t even know.

 

Joel Davis: They arrest this guy who defended himself against a knife wielding nutcase terrorist. He gets arrested for his trouble, and he’s probably been, …

 

Elijah Schaffer: This guy’s getting arrested.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, look, he’s been arrested. They get crash tackled and arrested for defending himself.

 

Elijah Schaffer: That’s insane!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: But to me. To me, this is why I think these videos are really important.

 

I mean, this genuinely, to those of you that are watching at home and you’re, it’s late at night. It’s a Friday. I know one of you said that you’re sober. Good for you. But most of you are not. The reason why these are important is because this is the equivalent.

 

Joel Davis: I am, unfortunately.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. There’s a beer in the fridge if you want. I think there’s one.

 

Joel Davis: But we don’t need to go. That’s all right.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, I think by the end of the Drew debate, you were, like, a little, like. You’re, like, nodding off. But it was great. No, I’ll say this is the equivalent of the:

 

“Trains not running on time, but Muslim stabbing you.”

 

Edition.

 

And also a good reminder of not getting upset about one issue. Can we also remind us. I want to get your opinion on this. I have a lot of colleagues who seem to be very supportive of Palestinians because they don’t like Israel and jews. They seem to be very supportive. And I know that the theory now is to bring the Palestinians over to Canada and Australia. That’s what they’re floating right now, I don’t want Muslims in the West, though, like, I’m still there. I’m still a little bit like. Lauren Southern 2018. Lauren Southern that’s how I guess my mind’s still there. And I know it’s not the only issue.

 

And like you said, but I still agree with this guy who got stabbed.

 

Joel Davis: Lauren Southern 2018. Is she already, like, race mixed with the half Asian fed yet? At that point, I’m not that arc yet.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I’m next.

 

Joel Davis: Elijah!

 

Elijah Schaffer: No, she’s a friend. I have no problem with her. Okay, but no, I was gonna say when she, I think she came to Australia and she interviewed Muslims or whatever and, like, was showing that there were, like, no go zones and people kind of just forgot about that, in my opinion. Like:

 

“Oh, because they’re more mad about Israeli influence in politics and AIPAC and sort of jewish geopolitics.”

 

We seem to have forgotten that we have an Islam problem, especially in Western Europe and increasingly in Australia and other nations. It’s not such a big issue in America. We have a black problem in America, African-American crime problem. But, like, I just want to know your opinion on this. Is that still relevant to people like yourself the Islamic infiltration of the West, or have you guys moved on?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, I mean, I kind of have this crazy radical idea that I don’t like jews or Muslims. I know it’s pretty wild, but I don’t like either of them.

 

Now, jews are the bigger problem of the two groups because they’re more politically powerful. They have higher agency.

 

But in a place like Germany in particular, where it’s you said in Australia, we do have a Muslim population, but it isn’t in Australia. In America, it isn’t like, the dominant population here. We’re getting, like, Indians and Asians, like, East Asians. In the United States, they’re getting a lot of Mexicans and, like, Latin Americans and so on as the big bulk of the immigrants pouring into the country.

 

Whereas in places like Germany, it’s Turks, it’s other, like people from different Muslim countries. The same in France, it’s the same in the Netherlands and Sweden and places like this.

 

So they’re like, the hostility to Islam in their political systems is way more pertinent, and they’re able to amass a lot more political power and influence and so on because they’ve got really big diaspora communities that are growing in a very, and obviously, obviously, Islamic cultures are very violent. You know, these people are not they’re not like Chinese people that are just here to, like, they’re going to take over, but they’re going to take over sneaky, you know what I mean? Like one Chinese restaurant here, buy out this property developer company and so on and work your way up.

 

No, they assert themselves in a lot more of a grug. It’s more of a grug colonialism. They’re just basically going to take over the streets. They’re going to rape all the women in the area. They’re going to form gangs. They’re going to take over organized crime.

 

And so it’s very in your face for these people.

 

So obviously, like, if you go to like a German nationalist and say:

 

“Stop focusing on the Muslims, the real issue is the jews.”

 

You know, you’re probably going to lose some people. I think you need to say the problem is Muslims and the jews.

 

And in fact, we wouldn’t have the Muslims here if it wasn’t for the jews. It’s all interconnected. Like, I don’t think this either or thing I don’t buy the difference is when they defer, they try and deflect anti-Islam sentiment into, like, supporting pro-Israel foreign policy. You know, Tommy Robinson does this kind of thing. And there’s plenty of other figures that do that. And that’s the problem. We got to defend against that. We can’t allow them to use our racism against us like they did in the two thousands to make us do pointless wars in Iraq and so on that aren’t in our interest, just wars for Israel.

 

But I think most people are kind of wise to that now.

 

But when it comes to the domestic issue with the domestic Islamic diasporas that are forming in Western countries, there could be no compromise with these people. They just, I’m a mass deportations enthusiast. They just have to go back.

 

[026:47]

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, but this is why I do bring this up, interestingly enough.

 

So I have a, I call these people colleagues because I’m still used to working in big networks, but really they’re just friends or people that I work with occasionally. I was on a show called Fresh and Fit in Florida when I was there a couple weeks ago. And you guys should check it out. It’s a good channel. It’s on Rumble. You should support Myron and the guys. It’s like a red pill channel. The video did really well. Did like 600,000 views the episode.

 

And the other one did a few hundred thousand, like a million views. Excellent episodes. And I don’t sound like a faggot in those ones because I had a cold, so my voice dropped and I grew up my balls out. It was actually pretty interesting. It was weird. I get sick and suddenly I sound like a man. But it was really good.

 

Now, I was on that show with another person called Sneako. You know, Sneako is. He’s a streamer, right? And so he’s Muslim, and he’s sort of like a Muslim apologist. He’s a friend, and I have no problems with him.

 

And I’m not going to take any, you know, slight of him. And I’m hoping to stream with him soon.

 

But I think it’s interesting because a lot of people in the streaming communities or in the online communities have really embraced Islam. Like, this is the genuine thing. And I saw he’s going to a Islamic convention. He’s bringing these, like, White streamers with him to go to this thing.

 

And while I’ll go on, like, Fresh and Fit and dunk on some whores or something like that with him. Because I think it’s funny. I’m not gonna support the Muslim apologia of western young men. What do you think about that? About, like, this idea of is that, is that connected at all to this Islamic extremism that’s being brought in these third worlders that are being brushed in? Like, how do you connect the two of Islam becoming popular among Generation Z through these streamers?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t think it’s too popular with White Zoomers. I do notice that in Britain, the people who tend to, the White people who tend to convert to Islam or all gingers for some reason. So, like, watch out for your ginger buddies. Like, if you got a ginger friend don’t let them watch too many Andrew Tate videos. Be like, hey, man, like, give them a Bible or something. Like, you steer them away from that stuff because they’re uniquely susceptible for some reason.

 

But if you have a non-ginger young White Zoomer friend, I wouldn’t be too worried that he’s going to get psyopped into becoming a Muslim, because it just doesn’t really jive, I don’t think, with the Whiteman’s psyche.

 

So I’m not too worried about that. But I am worried about the conciliatory attitude that many people who, in the so-called pro-White movement or the dissident Right, are developing towards, towards Muslims, toward Islam. Islam is an ancient enemy of Christendom. Of Europe. They’ve been our enemy for millennia. Yes. Like we are against the jews, and they have their issues with Israel and so on.

 

And so there’s some common ground that we could find with them rhetorically, but they’re not reliable political allies. They ultimately have their own interests, and they’re going to keep pushing for their interests, and we have ours. And I’m sure someone like sneaker probably would understand that if you unpacked it, you have your White Christian identity, and that’s what’s important to you.

 

But there’s a lot of Muslims who they’ll pretend to be your friend when it’s just you, one on one.

 

I mean, I knew Muslims since I was I grew up in Sydney. I met Muslim kids when I was a teenager. I went to school with some of them. And when you’re talking with them one on one, and you talk about, “oh, yeah, zionism”, and they’d be very friendly to you.

 

But then when they get into a group and there’s like 15 of them, and they all start, like, vibing in the weird Arab cultural clique, then all of a sudden they’re hostile. And that’s an experience you get with a lot of these non-Whites. They can be very friendly to you in situations in which it’s a White coated situation, but they’re not going to keep behaving that way when they’re 15, 20, 30, 40% of the population, and they control the whole town, and all of a sudden they’re going to start imposing themselves on us.

 

[30:50]

 

Elijah Schaffer: So why do White people not get that? Because go to my screen here, Brian. There is this ad out here about meet the new Germans, and you have this inbred looking motherfucker. He looks like a light bulb meets ET, and he’s got the negative cantal tilt. Is that what you call it? His eyes. So he’s got a form of Down Syndrome that’s undiagnosed and very unfortunate looking physiognomy. I don’t know what’s going on.

 

Someone said that they could tell he was Ethiopian from his physiognomy. I’m not very familiar with African physiognomies, but look, that is not what Germans look like. I can just tell you that.

 

But there is this interesting thing where the only people who believe these are Germans, in my opinion, are probably White Germans. I don’t even think these guys believe they’re actually German. They’ll just say it to take advantage of the system. And what’s going on? Why is it that White people don’t believe that they have a racial identity, or a national identity? And why does it seem universally across the board that all of the nations, White people think that their nationality is like an idea? Right? So, like with what Ronald Reagan said, like, America is an idea and it’s., … Anyone can be, you know, an American. Why is that only in White countries and not anywhere else?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the thing is that Germans don’t actually believe that. Because if they believe that and they wouldn’t feel guilty because how could you have guilt that’s specific to being a actual job? Because obviously all Germans are White, how could you feel guilty if it doesn’t matter and it’s just an idea, and they obviously don’t actually believe that they wouldn’t be able to feel the guilt that generates that inclusion in the first place.

 

So really it’s a system that’s built on White guilt. It’s not built upon, like, a total inability to see race. It’s pretending like race isn’t a factor because you’re guilty as a White person.

 

So that’s why it functions that way. Everyone knows that race is real, everyone can feel it. They just lie to themselves and it’s almost, like, immoral. That’s the other thing as well. Notice how whenever somebody starts to speak like I do, even in a much softer way, the reaction is never:

 

“Oh, let’s have a discussion. Oh, well, you have that view, but here’s all the counter evidence, here’s all the scientific data that shows that race isn’t important, and here’s all the counter arguments.”

 

And just have a calm and rational conversation. That’s never the reaction. The reaction is always:

 

“You’re a fucking bad person. You’re an evil person for even thinking like that!”

 

Why would you need morality to adjudicate truth? If the truth is the truth? You wouldn’t. The moral injunction has to be put there because if we just freely and openly, with no judgment, weigh into these subjects, well, then you’re going to come out as a mass deportations enthusiast, so, …

 

Elijah Schaffer: And Hindu, you know, which is crazier! The Hindu side of you is what threw me off.

 

And you mentioned earlier, Hindus are using that a lot. And I would say if we could get Hindus to have the same feelings towards deodorant that they do towards swastika, we’d probably make some racial progress. Because I saw it was hitting. I think it almost hit like 50 degrees in Mumbai. I think that you might die and imagine the smell. Yeah, dude, look, I. Hey, shout out to.

 

Joel Davis: I’ve been to India, by the way. They like, the street shitting thing isn’t a meme. Like, it’s happening everywhere.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Are you serious?

 

Joel Davis: And there’s open sewers down the side of the road. There’s just like, shit flows all through the city.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I moved into a house

 

Joel Davis: When I got back to Melbourne. I never smell anything that good in my life after like spending like a week just basting in like pajeet, like, poo particles. I was like, Australia smells incredible! Like, I was like, almost gonna lick the floor or something, you know?

 

Elijah Schaffer: You know, they. I saw a video of a Indian woman sticking her face into cow poop and it was titled “Average Canadian Skincare Routine”.

 

So I was like, it’s unfortunate, but you know, a lot of pajeets are very kind people. But I just. Cuz you’re kind, you know, there’s.

 

Joel Davis: You don’t want someone who smells to be too kind because then you have to didn’t.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. Did you see that? I want to show you this video. Did you see that? Like, the black guys get suing the airline because they got removed off the plane for smelling like shit! You see that? That’s a real story. Okay.

 

Before we jump into that, though, I want to give a huge shout out to one of our sponsors here. Guys, this is so important as we talk about this now, you guys know we’re sponsored by Censored TV. It’s absolutely amazing! They keep us going and growing.

 

But I want to remind you something, okay? Go to my screen here. Brian. The wellness company has a special offer for you guys with their emergency kits. And here’s why it’s important. I’m in a country right now where they outlawed, like, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine during the Covid scamdemic because they wanted you to take the vaccines that are causing heart problems and miscarriages and whatnot.

 

Also, I remember I actually got sick during Covid And they didn’t want you to go into the hospital and they didn’t want to give you antibiotics because everything was Covid.

 

My point is that basic infections, like, whether it’s Covid-19 a common cold, whether you get cut on something, you need antibiotics like amoxicillin, a was pac, you need Ivermectin. And you can either go to an emergency room and spend $500 on the copay, even if you have insurance. Or you can go to the medical office that’s overloaded, just tons of people there. And you can try to get an appointment, and they might not even prescribe you antibiotics because they’re going to tell you you need a flu vaccine instead. So save money, save time. Get this emergency kit today. It can fight almost all infections. It has all the medication you need in one place. All you’ve got to do is to prepare for your family. At TWC Health Offensive. It’s TWC. Dot h e a l the h on of e in. I have e. Get 10% off with my promote code offensive. It’s so amazing! You get a regular emergency kits, too, for your car or whatever. But I’m telling you guys, if you don’t have a stock, this is something you could. This would be.

 

[36:49]

 

So I don’t think you could do this in Australia. Australia, you can’t just order drugs online, but in America, you can.

 

So you’ve got to check this out. It’s really easy, especially if you don’t have insurance or you don’t have great insurance. I have guns, body armor, emergency food, and also a good stash of antibiotics and antiviral drugs because disease time is coming, and you don’t want to wait until it’s too late. Go to TWC health offensive. Use my promote code offensive for 10% off the emergency kit. They’re actually really freaking amazing stuff, and I already have one at the US when I go back, so check it out.

 

I wanted to play that video for you real quickly here of the give me 1 second to bring this up on the screen. Yeah. Lauren Whitzke put it up today.

 

So, yeah, let’s watch this. Oh, these guys actually got removed off of a plane. Brian, put it full screen, and let’s listen.

 

Joel Davis: We don’t need one getting taken off the plane. Three Brooklyn men say they were kicked off an American Airlines flight to JFK and weren’t initially given a reason why. When they pressed further, they told us that the reason that we were being put off the plane and rebooked was because of a body odor.

 

Elijah Schaffer: A lawsuit filed in New York against American Airlines alleges they, along with five other black men, were thrown off the plane solely based on their race.

 

Joel Davis: This is discrimination.

 

Elijah Schaffer: All right, before I play the rest, do you know what I think is.

 

Joel Davis: So sad about airline is that we.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I think it’s American.

 

Joel Davis: I’m booking all my flights when I’m in the United States next with them.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, I was gonna say I love it how they

 

Joel Davis: KKK has infiltrated American Airlines. We’re back.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Oh, no. American Airlines is gay. It’s my main airline. But I just use it because it’s hubbed everywhere, and it’s like way cheaper than flying here in the US. It’s so nice, but it’s like these guys got kicked off for smelling like shit! Okay? That’s the official reason.

 

And then they say that’s racial discrimination. So they didn’t say, because you’re black, you smell like shit, you got to get off. But they said we smell like shit!

 

Joel Davis: Oh, that’s because we’re black.

 

Elijah Schaffer: That’s because we’re black. You don’t like how we smell, and they’re right, okay? That’s one way. That’s one perspective. You know?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, it’s not 1%. I mean, Elijah, you know, better than me. You’re an American. You’ve been smelling niggas your whole life.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay? Let me tell you. Let me tell you. I’ve lived with a lot of black people.

 

And when I say a lot. This is not a joke. This is not a joke. I live with a black guy who ended up smoking meth, inviting a homeless person to squat in my living room, and then stole my car. That’s not a joke. And, yeah, that’s a real. I’ve told that story many times. I also had a black roommate with cerebral palsy who said he was messy because of his camp. I was like:

 

“Dude, just because your fucking joints are fucked up doesn’t mean you can’t put your underwear away!”

 

You know what I mean?

 

But one of my roommates used to, like, stash. Like, he would, like, drink beer and stash the cans in the cracks of the couch, and I’d be like, just throw it away. And my other black roommate used to sleep on the couch exclusively, but he’d put, like, shea butter on him, so then the whole house was greasy. Like, the remotes would, like, have, like, oil on them.

 

And then a black guy, you know, robbed me. But that’s another. That’s not a roommate.

 

But I will say this.

 

The only thing I noticed was, this is the black people I lived with and there was another black roommate when I went to school in Marietta, but they didn’t shower often because they said they didn’t need to because they didn’t have oil in their hair. Or on their body. Is that common chat? I’d like to know in the chat if, you know, that. If you’re black and you watch the show, do you shower every day? Cuz they didn’t shower often. I don’t know how they smell that.

 

Joel Davis: I noticed that when I was in New York that whenever I went into like a club or something or just like there was like a pack of Negroes on the street. Usually they were smoking a joint or something, so you’d smell that.

 

But that’s one of the craziest things about New York. You turn every corner, you turn someone’s like lighting up a doobie.

 

[40:41]

 

Elijah Schaffer: But anyway, okay, that’s every minority smells like weed in the US. I was just back there. That’s a true thing. You walk by, even at the airport, workers like outside just reeks like weed. American.

 

Joel Davis: All the airport workers at JFK and LaGuardia, they’re all these sassy, fat black women:

 

“You just take those shoes off, you know what I mean? It’s like because I have obviously affirmative action.”

 

They got to put them somewhere they can’t give them like a proper job. So they got to give them like all the useless jobs. I kind of, I didn’t mind that it’s kind of like that’s a good role for a black.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Do White people work at airports? I don’t think so. when’s the last time I’ve seen like a, I mean, there’s old White people like the ticket counter. If you go to a really small airport, you’ll still see White people, in like North Carolina or something.

 

But if you go to any major metropolitan airport, it’s mostly Arabs, Punjabis, and blacks.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s like, what do you call gas stations? Like, we call them servos and it’s kind of like that. We just went to the gas station, as American viewers would call it, to get some energy drinks. And Elijah lives in the White flight area. It’s a nice area. So we go into the and everyone working there is White.

 

And I was like, dude this is crazy! We’re in a gas station. And the workers in Melbourne where I’m from, it’s all in, they’re always Indian. Like every time it’s:

 

“Thank you. Come again.”

 

Every time you go.

 

Elijah Schaffer: They like it though, too. I think they like the jobs because have you noticed this? I went to a 711 and the pajeet guy working there is on his phone, just like watching videos.

 

And it’s like, clearly of women’s asses and stuff like, I mean, it wasn’t porn, but it was just like he was clear on some algorithm of like, just women in joggers or whatever. And I had like, a bunch of shit because I’m, you know, was just buying random stuff. And like, I clearly needed a bag and stuff.

 

And I was like, could I get a bag, please? You know, he’s not even looking. And he’s like, grabs a paper bag and just like, lays it flat in front of me. It wasn’t open. And I looked at him and I was like:

 

“Could you bag the items?”

 

And then he did it. But I don’t know. I was a really weird interaction. I got a little porn. I got treated like shit! It was a little sadomasochist, but it definitely wasn’t what I. That’s what I mean by The Decline of the West is like, what the fuck is that?

 

Joel Davis: Brown people?

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, for a lack of better words that I don’t feel like 30 years ago when a 16 year old would have been. That have been like some, you know, weekend job or something would have ever gotten away with treating a customer like shit or like, looking at, like, soft core porn while, well, handing, like, your poison.

 

Joel Davis: Think about it like, Indians have been evolutionaries, evolutionarily selected for having sex with Indian women. I don’t know if you’ve ever seen any Indian women before, but I’m hardly cracking a semi when I see a nice pajita, you know, walking down the street. So imagine how horny you would have to be to be, like, pursuing that.

 

So the scale of horny that, like the Indian biome needs to generate so that they can keep perpetuating their disgusting race is so beyond, like, White horny. You know, White horny is refined. And we care about aesthetics and so on.

 

You know, that’s why we can control it.

 

But if you’re like, biologically designed to just basically fuck anything that moves, because that’s basically how you survive as a race, then you’re going to be too distracted by soft core pornography to the bag correctly on a table. Can you imagine?

 

Elijah Schaffer: We’re so fucked on this episode.

 

But it’s fine. It’s fine.

 

By the way, if you’re new to the show and you’re watching this, I don’t censor my. I actually do not censor my guests, but we do. The way that I play by big tech’s rules is like, if guests are gonna if something. If a video or something violates it, then we just take it off big tech and keep it on Rumble. Luckily, we’re rebuilding the whole show.

 

Joel Davis: However, can I can turn it down?

 

Elijah Schaffer: No, no.

 

Joel Davis: Why you brought me on go as I’m trying to give you what?

 

Elijah Schaffer: Go where you want. I’m trying people on YouTube. That’s why I’m trying to tell them, if you’re watching on YouTube, make sure that you subscribe to the Rumble and you join censored. Because a lot of our content scrubs.

 

Joel Davis: To me on Rumble as well. Joel Davis. I’m banned from YouTube. So.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, go to Joel Davis. I’m trying to get everyone from the YouTube saying this is like, a lot of people think we, like, don’t stream certain days or things on YouTube. And it’s really. Things just get pulled and deleted a lot. So go to Rumble and support it and don’t give me your fucking bullshit! Like, I don’t like the tech there. I don’t like censorship. So don’t be at YouTube because YouTube is gay and fake.

 

So you need to go over to Rumble.

 

Joel Davis: Like, Rumble isn’t as good of interface, a user experience, but you can say the n-word.

 

So it’s like, where’s your priorities?

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, they let Nick Fuentes stream on there. That’s crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, everyone.

 

Elijah Schaffer: They let you stream. Yeah, I need it. I know, I. Dude, I don’t tone it down. I’m just reminding people because that’s good. Let me go here. Oh, I forgot to mention. Hey, happy pride. It’s Pride month. Not in America.

 

Joel Davis: Throw a Roman cuz, like, why pride month? We’re back. It’s illegal, so I couldn’t do it, dude.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Hey, I’ll let you do. If you come in the US and go on the show, you can I get to America?

 

Joel Davis: I’m gonna be throwing so many Roman salutes because it’ll finally be legal.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, like, when you get it, I’m.

 

Joel Davis: Gonna get a gun. Like a huge, like M 16 and CIA here. What.

 

Elijah Schaffer: What is that agency?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the CIA couldn’t be asus, but I think you’re thinking of ASIO, which is like our. Yeah, it’s like, I’m FBI and NSA was mixed together.

 

Elijah Schaffer: It’s like, I could already see that. The report. The report. When the agent comes my door, it’s like Joel Davis said he’s gonna visit you to throw to Sig Heil Hitler and buy a gun. Yes, sir. That was my show.

 

[46:38]

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing about gun rights, because a lot of people there’s kind of arguments between Australians and Americans online. And Americans are like:

 

“Oh, Australia, you guys are so cucked with all this tyranny because you don’t have gun rights like we do.”

 

And then Australians are like:

 

“What are you? Like, you’re not going to overthrow the government with your guns. You know, you’re just larping!”

 

And it goes back and forth.

 

But it’s like, what Australians need to realize is that America is full of niggers. That’s why they need the first Amendment. It’s nigger protection. It’s not about overthrowing the government. That’s not really realistic in the 21st century.

 

But when you, like, you can’t have.

 

And that’s why we need to have gun rights back here. Like, they’re bringing in Sudanese, they’re bringing in Somalis, they’re bringing in all of these violent demographics. And every other day we see another. You know, we need gun rights. Not because we’re going to overthrow the government. That would be nice. I guess one day maybe we could dream, but on a more realistic level, just so that you can defend yourself. Like, you know, my girlfriend is an American. And I say when she’s in America, I’m like, take your gun, like, in the car because what if you pull up at a gas station and some nigger walks over and tries to like, I bought.

 

Elijah Schaffer: My guns to protect myself from black people.

 

Joel Davis: Exactly!

 

Elijah Schaffer: And that’s not it. But that’s not a hateful thing to say.

 

Joel Davis: It’s like, my self preservation.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, my experience is I’ve been a victim of many crimes, okay? Like, in LA. And they were all at the hands of black people, and one was Hispanic. I haven’t been a victim of crimes. And by victim, I mean literal car theft, home invasion, these type of things. And not the current victim, where someone said mean words and made you uncomfortable, but, like, real crimes that we gotta protect ourselves against. Yeah. And so and I know, like I explained to Kez, my wife, I go, this is a real truthful statement.

 

If you just stay out of black neighborhoods and you avoid groups of black people. Your chances of being involved in a serious violent crime, that’s not a crime of passion. Obviously, you could still get in a mixed up relationship or something, but just from a stranger, probably goes down near 100%. It’s not like 70%..

 

If you just avoid people that are in black kids, in-groups and stuff, you stay away. Your chances of being involved in a violent crime unprovoked are go down to almost zero in the US.

 

Joel Davis: That was one of my first early red pills. I remember watching the Stefan Molyneux video. This is a throwback back in 2014, who was a libertarian youtuber, but he was also a race realist, and he made a video on the truth about gun laws in America. And he went through how obviously in the Democrat states, in some states, you have restrictions on guns that are almost as extreme as you have here in Australia.

 

And then in other states, basically, you can have whatever you want. If you’re in Idaho or New Hampshire, or a place like that, there’s almost no restrictions.

 

And anyway the point was that there’s absolutely zero correlation between gun crime rates and the severity of the gun laws. So, like, Illinois has some of the strictest gun laws in America, but also has one of the highest rates of gun crime. Why is that? Was because Chicago, it’s full of blacks. If you analyze it based upon the, basically the black percentage of your population, it perfectly predicts which states are going to have the most gun crime.

 

So the issue is not guns. The issue is black people with guns.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, and this.

 

So let’s talk about this is, I’m going to pick your mind here. I find it interesting. A lot of black people hate me on Twitter.

 

I don’t know if, you know, about this. Yeah, like the entire, possibly the entire black community of the United States, minus the cool ones that watch this show. And unironically I get a lot of these comments like:

 

“Oh, your hatred of blacks, your hatred of blacks. Your hatred of blacks!”

 

And their reasoning of saying, I hate blacks is always the stuff I post.

 

Now, what do I post, really? I don’t say much of anything. I just post videos of them. I just post videos that they upload, by the way. It’s not like I’m hacking in black people’s phones and stealing their private fight videos. They’re uploading them to the Internet, and I’m just resharing them. And there’s dozens of new ones per day I can choose from, and I have to fight to not share it. My page could quickly just become black crime, which some pages are Anthony Cumia and other people. But there’s so much to choose from that I’m like, I have to physically just not share 99% of the black crime videos I see every single day because they’re not interesting, but it’s a real issue, and they think it’s racist to put that on blast.

 

Same reason why trans people think it’s transphobic, like Libs of TikTok to put up their own videos about their pronouns or whatever in the United States with this crime thing. Why is it that we cannot, on the Left or the Right, just say black crime? Why can we not say this when it’s so obvious? It’s so obvious. You have people like Xavier from Prageru, who left BlM a couple years ago, calling me racist and saying, I deserve, my mom deserves to be, my dead mom deserves to be roasted, and I deserve to get, you know, beat up or whatever he says.

 

These are Prageru. This is like the Right-wing. You have a friend of mine, David Harris Junior, calling them Democrats.

 

[51:40]

 

Joel Davis: Prager’s a jew, by the way, for those who make sure everyone watching this knows. Seen that clip of Dennis Prager where he’s going on about how, like, we should allow pedophiles to Jack off to child porn because it’s technically not a sin or something. If it’s a pornography is not a sin, apparently, because, you know, he has some, like, jewish Talmudic reasoning.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Really?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I believe you.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I just haven’t. I’ve heard this, but I’ve not seen it directly, but I have heard that it was something about lollipop, right? It was like a cartoon, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think Prager, you, by the way, I think they’re like, the head of their operation was a literal Mossad agent, correct?

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: She’s a nice lady, though, matter, but.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, I wouldn’t say she’s a nice lady.

 

Elijah Schaffer: No kind in person. Like.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but she’s an enemy of the United States. She’s an enemy of the White race. I mean, should probably be, you know, dealt with but the point is that prager is like, literally like a it’s not Right-wing. It’s just jewish jews.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Jews, jews, jews!

 

Joel Davis: Dude.

 

Elijah Schaffer: So I’m trying to pick your brain here because I what I’m trying to understand is, I’m saying, whether it’s someone like that guy Xavier, who’s like, clearly still a BLM, like, progressive, that’s why he was hired. Right. Because they don’t want real Right-wing people working for those organizations. They want Leftists that just find a new grift, and that’s fine. But I do get that that’s a whole nother world.

 

But why is it that even Republicans, whenever blacks commit crimes, they call them Democrats?

 

And I think it’s, I always bring up the fact that Massachusetts is very Democrat, so is New Hampshire, and they’re very Democrat. And I’ve never felt unsafe in Massachusetts. You know what I mean? It’s very, I was mentioning, I’m opening up a studio in south, in Palm Beach county in south Florida. It’s a Democrat county. And I didn’t feel any danger where Trump lives. West Palm beach is Democrat. You think Mar a Lago is in any danger?

 

Joel Davis: Is Bernie Sanders from again, Vermont? Yeah, I think you’re safe in Vermont. I don’t think you need to be packed in Vermont.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I’m trying to say is you go to the Mar a Lago. That’s a Democrat stronghold right there. Do you feel dangerous? Danger on the isles of West Palm beach? Hell, no! You have a drink in your hand and you’re chilling. Like, I’m just saying, like, why do they refuse to just say black crime? Like, why can no one say that? I don’t get it. I say it all the time and I get labeled a racist. But who cares?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, but why don’t, I’m asking you why people can’t admit that, like, what is the fundamental reason why no one will just say, hey, we got a black crime problem.

 

[54:11]

 

Joel Davis: Well, when we’re talking about, I mean, you mentioned a black guy that’s employed by jews to lead the so-called Right-wing. I think it’s quite clear why he can’t talk about it because he exists as a jewish agent of promoting basically a race blind formulation of politics to project into the White population and keep them on the ZOG plantation, keep them pulling the lever for Republicans and, oh, yes, we need more opportunity zones and so on.

 

The issue with blacks is that we just don’t have the Right social programs, like, or something like, if, no, the issue with blacks is that they’re black.

 

And the only solution to the problems with black people is removing them from your country.

 

I mean, there really isn’t any, like people are what they are. Blacks always going to be violent. And even this guy, he’s supposedly like, probably like, he’s like:

 

“Oh, I’m a Christian.”

 

And he’s laughing. As a Whiteman, you know, engaging in conservative politics. You say something anti-black, whatever, and then immediately he chimps out. We see this over and over again with blacks:

 

“You say blacks are violent? Well, I’d beat you up if you said that to my face!”

 

You know what I mean? They just proved the point, so there really is no fixing it.

 

And the thing is that they have an inferiority complex as well, and it’s a justified inferiority complex, so there really isn’t a solution to it. White people have been trying to pretend like black people are just like us as best we can, and it doesn’t work because they know that they’re not.

 

So, yeah, there really is no solution but removing them from our communities and our countries.

 

Elijah Schaffer: I want to talk about this more, but Brian, we’re going to have to kill the YouTube stream. Can you get, can you kill that and delete that, please? I already saw that we’re getting reported. People are reporting the video because someone in the community we’re discussing currently, apparently. Yeah, thanks, Brian.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, just kill that. We’re uncensored, by the way, TV locals and Rumble.

 

So you’re gonna have to stay on here. We’re good to go. We’re not gonna go to a music break like we normally do. We’re just gonna keep going on this. I think we’re good. I think we’ve killed the stream because I don’t want to dampen this. Just so you guys know, very soon we are going to be stopped streaming on YouTube altogether.

 

Because the goal for slightly offensive when I open up my new studio is this, which has always been my goal, to let people say whatever the fuck they want.

 

And so the way we’re going to do that is by being uncensored and Rumble. And then we’re just going to clip the show out and put clips on YouTube that are highly censored. And hopefully you guys hate the clip so much on YouTube that you just go watch the show on Rumble.

 

But honestly, the show’s doing so well on Rumble. I’m really proud of the work you guys have done and kept the show alive because the fact that we can still on a normal night like now, get like 1600 live viewers and it’s like a fucking 11:00 at night on a Friday.

 

I mean, that’s just so good! And you guys watched the replay, so thank you. We are talking about removing blacks from society with my Hindu guests.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I said to you last time I was on the show, like, when we went the first time we did a show together, I said, just like, black people congregating is like a national security threat. Like, when you get enough black people in a space, they’re just gonna start rioting and, like, destroying cars and, like, stealing all the Nike sneakers and television sets within like, a ten mile radius. And we’ve seen this over and over again, so, you know, they’re just not compatible with civilization.

 

Elijah Schaffer: But wait, wait, wait, wait, wait!

 

Joel Davis: Civilization.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Wait. Let me, let me. Let’s get real about this. Let’s not get hyperbolic.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay. Because, like, a lot of things, I say a lot of hyperbolic things. Let’s look at the US or even Australia. Okay? Australia even is a better example because you have these Aboriginals. But I don’t want to talk about this. I don’t get in trouble in your own country. So we’ll talk about American blacks here. Yeah, but I want to talk about. But I’m saying. But American blacks, in terms of all right they were brought there against their will. I don’t care if you want to blame the Arabs, the jews, Whites. I don’t care who you blame for that. The point was, is blacks didn’t immigrate to the United States, okay? They were brought there against their will. That is a truthful statement. Whether or not. I don’t care. Again, in the chat, don’t get mad and fight over who brought them. Just listen. They’re there.

 

So now we have these black people. And the country may not have been founded to allow black people to vote. It may not have been founded to give black people rights. It may not have been founded for black people, and it wasn’t. And our founders maybe even owned slaves. So we know what they thought about black people.

 

Fast forwarding ahead, going through the great assault that they lie and call a civil war when one foreign nation invaded another to instill this anti-federalism, or whatever it’s called, moving ahead to the civil rights, which was at gunpoint, forcing people to integrate, and now, which is like Dei fake integration, where they give, like, black people fake degrees at high end universities to integrate them into jobs, and then they give them no responsibility. This is really what happens in the US. You said to remove them. These black people are politicians. They are military servicemen. They work in banks, they are Professors, and many of which are positive contributing members of their local communities and some of which are my friends or even watch the show.

 

So explain then, with that, and I’m not, like, going hard on you here. I’m just like, yeah, so with that all being true and getting off of just like, I’m on a podcast, remove them. What does that actually mean to you? Like, how would you remove an entire ethnic group that again, it’s not like it’s just Indians on, like, a visa. We can just kick them out or something on a visa. These are people there for hundreds of years, longer than some of the White people.

 

Joel Davis: Course.

 

Elijah Schaffer: What does that look like?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, separation could take multiple forms because it depends on how it would politically manifest.

 

But in a scenario where White Americans develop a stronger consciousness, which is already happening, and it’s going to continue happening, obviously. Like, you know, my understanding, I’ve known many Americans in my life, is that basically, as a White American, your basic task in life is trying to make enough money and advance enough in your career and so on to be able to move away from black people.

 

So White people are White flight is a thing for a reason why people are constantly trying to run away from black people? Well, at a certain point, there has to be a place where they no longer have to run away. There has to be a place where they make the blacks run away. There has to be a place where it’s just White people. That’s our fucking place!

 

So that has to be determined. Where are we going to dig in and say, this is the territory where we’re going to maintain this for the Whiteman and we’re not going to allow any more blacks in. And I don’t know exactly how that would work, how big that territory would be, how it would be negotiated. You know, you could create a black ethno-state here, a White ethno-state there. You could, …

 

[1:01:14]

 

Elijah Schaffer: It’s called Chicago.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. You could do what they tried to do with Liberia, where you just take over a whole part of Africa, and then you just basically start moving the blacks back there and let them build their own country back in Africa or something.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Israel is a good example, too, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Like, yeah. Some kind of black zionism or something. There’s lots of different solutions.

 

But the point is that we need to start having this discussion because White people can’t just keep running away. White flight. White flight. White flight ad infinitum. There’s less and less places to go. And it’s not just blacks that are encroaching. Obviously, there’s other races that are encroaching.

 

And so it’s kind of holistic.

 

But we need to start talking about a solution, because if we don’t come up with a solution, there’s going to be nowhere left to run, and there’s going to be no more White people on a long enough timeline.

 

If you just kind of go to the logical conclusion, we’re not going to have control of anything. We’re not going to have our own space anywhere, and we’re not going to be able to pass down a territory, a way of life, a culture, and a civilization to our progeny. And that’s just unacceptable. It’s just unacceptable. You can have, you know, negresses twerking on the ruins of Western civilization, or you can have them removed from Western civilization like it’s one or the other.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Well, it’s obviously I want to play something for you because I want to back up what you’re saying. We do have a problem where to make it seem like black and white people are integrating better. I mentioned this earlier. They give fake degrees from prestigious universities to black people. And I was called out for blatant racism recently for saying that exact point. And I found a video that backs that up directly. I don’t know if this is NYU. I’m not sure what the school colors are, but my understanding this is from a prestigious university interviewing minority girls on what degrees they got. I swear it sounds like they’re capping. But this is real. Listen.

 

Joel Davis: Latin American women in visual culture. Yeah. Hi, I’m Melanie. I’m studying the unseen body in creative spaces.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Erasion, exposure of the queer. Yes. Hey, I’m Nina, and I studied the arts, education and social justice. Yeah, I’m Joyce. I studied decolonial intimacies, indigenous politics, and persistence. Yeah, I’m Victoria, and I studied remembering or forgetting? Navigating international conflict through collective memory. Yay! Hi, I’m Yvonne, and I study monstrosity, the subaltern fact. She studied. This is literally her degree. The study of the theory of monstrosity, the subaltern praxis. Okay, it gets worse. These are their real degrees. What should I say? I created it. Hi, I’m Nunyala. I’m studying living artfully, art as ritual therapy and pathways of decoloniality she’s studying living artfully, art as ritual therapy and a pathway to decoloniality. These are real degrees, by the way. I’m Naomi, and I’m studying black political economy. Yeah, I’m Natalie, and I’m studying fashion history and gender studies. Yeah. She studied phenomenological approaches to black womanhood, specifically how bondage affects psychological and sexual development. What do you. What is it? You just masturbate with a vibrator or something? Like, what is that?

 

[1:04:39]

 

Joel Davis: Um, well, phenomenology is. You want me, like.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah, like, I’m retarded! I don’t know what the fuck?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So the philosopher Edmund Husserl, who was a jewish German jew, developed phenomenology. It’s basically instead of the conventional historical form of philosophy, is to try and reason metaphysically, try and reason from first principles, basically trying to figure out the question, what is there out there in the world? And try and, like, build a system of how you can develop knowledge about whatever it is directly. Phenomenology goes, we’re going to bracket what the truth is independently of subjectivity, and instead try and understand subjectivity itself. What is the structure of subjectivity? What is the subject of the phenomenon? Not the thing in itself, whatever exists independently of what you think about it, but the structure of how you think about things, the structure of how you encounter the world.

 

So presumably what this would be is trying to take the very perspectival view on black womanhood and saying:

 

“Well, there’s a unique black perspective that is culturally constructed and basically, like, black sexuality or something.”

 

And how black women probably. There’s a feminist undertone, right? So there’s probably, like, this idea that, like, black women have been trained by the White Patriarchy to become submissive or something, and there’d be some kind of liberation notion.

 

But, yeah, obviously, this stuff is all just what the universities exist now to do in a lot, in large respect, is just create Left-wing ideologues. And they just want to put as many Left-wing ideologues on payrolls, give them degrees, so they can then be inserted into corporations, also minorities, which is the same thing.

 

Elijah Schaffer: But, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. But they want to have minorities with these Left-wing ideological programing, so they can then be inserted into HR departments and various corporations, being certain government departments and so on.

 

And then once they’re installed in all of these places, now they’re advising, now they’re experts on diversity and inclusion and all this stuff. So then now you’ve got these Left-wing ideologues that are basically like full on radicalized with, they’re like non-Whites that have been radicalized with like postmodern communist ideologies that basically blame White people for everything.

 

And then they’ve been installed in, basically they get installed in like every big corporation, every government department, to then basically flush out any White people that don’t completely cuck from any of these positions. So that basically the only White people in power are White cucks.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Yeah. Okay, let’s break down a little bit about the scam of college education. This is a good direction. Some points I’ve brought up on the show is sort of how universities are used as an institution to undermine and subvert Western society versus what they were founded for, which is actually to help Western society initially. That’s why they were mostly only men attended and you actually had to have academic scholarship. It was about intellectual pursuit. That’s not what it is anymore. I want to remind you guys, by the way, if you’re watching on Rumble or uncensored, you can Superchat. I will be reading all the Superchats at the end. And their tickets cost dollar 500 to get up here. And I get paid dollar 48 a month by Censored TV.

 

So I have to work for seven months to pay for the tickets. But you guys can help by leaving the Rumble rants below and we’ll read them all out.

 

But I’m going to ask you guys, I guess actually you can say whatever fuck you want because the ones that are going to get me in trouble, I’ll just have Joel read them because he doesn’t care.

 

So you can say whatever you want, but try to be creative because when we get Hitler, be entertaining. Yeah, Hitler Lover 1488, just saying gas the jews or something. It’s like, okay, try to at least. Yeah, try to at least not waste my time here, but I’ll take your money even if you want to be a retard!

 

However, on the flip side, I do want to hear from you guys. So drop them.

 

And also in Locals as well, we’ll be reading them. All my computer, I don’t have it. So I’m just reading on my phone the chat today, but just to remind you guys to leave those rants. And this is a good reminder to subscribe to Joel Davis on Rumble, which the channel is called. What? Just Joel Davis?

 

Joel Davis: Correct.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Okay, so yeah, go to Joel Davis. Subscribe to my Rumble if you like what he’s saying. If you fucking hate him, still subscribe. He’ll take your hate Rumble rants. He’ll take your hate watches. He doesn’t care.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I recently said on stream because there were all these non-Whites in the group chat and I was like, just, I don’t want you watching my streams. Like, you follow us around like a bad smell. You can’t even let me have my racist live stream. You better be in the group chat. Just go away. Like what part of I’m literally on here, like how Hitler White power and you’re still watching, you can they all take, doesn’t matter where, doesn’t matter how racist the Whiteman gets. They just still want to be like attached to us at the hip, you.

 

Elijah Schaffer: Know, you know, White supremacy, first movement.

 

Joel Davis: I just want to be left alone.

 

Elijah Schaffer: But, you know, it really want to grill. There is actually a lot of I would call them, there is a certain subset of people who are minority who hate their own race. I mean that genuinely, like, there are White supremacist. Like, I think Vice wrote an article and everyone mocked it.

 

Joel Davis: Like, that was a non-White. Like, I can understand why they feel that way. It’s pretty comprehensible, but it’s not my problem.

 

And that’s the thing. It’s like if you really are a White supremacist, then you should leave me alone because then you would realize that your presence in my life is degrading its quality. That you, like, if you really love White, if you’re a non-White person and you’re like, yeah I sympathize with what he’s saying and I sympathize with the Whiteman. But you live in one of our countries or you’re watching the show, like, leave, just leave us behind. We don’t like, just cut the cord. Figure shit out with your own people, figure shit out with your own culture. Just do your own thing!

 

[1:10:23]

 

Elijah Schaffer: And watch Slightly offensive. You guys can leave his stream and watch this stream because this is a very diverse audience. But I get what you’re saying in terms of its interesting, but I do bring up that fact about the White supremacist thing. I’m actually not joking about this, though. I really am serious. That’s why there’s always been, and I always say there will always be a small percentage of non-White people in a White country simply on just diplomatic reasons. Like take like Washington, DC, right? You’ll have diplomatic families and people living there because of embassies. There will be obviously traded visas.

 

So obviously, we maybe have a spy in the Philippines, and we got to get them out.

 

So the CIA grants them citizenship because, I don’t know, in exchange for ten years of spying. I’m just saying there’s always going to be some form of communication. But today what we don’t have are people that hate their country, want to get out of it, or we’re getting something out of them. We have people coming to fuck our systems and to rape physically and artificially rape our systems.

 

So we don’t have this sense of like, hey, there’s an Indian guy who came here in 1994 through some sort of a business acquisition, and he started this great company, and he loves America and he hates India, and he’s always wanted to get out. And there’s this one Indian family that lives in our city, and they’re pleasant people. What you have is millions of temporary visas. A third of them drop out of college and then take, like, that’s what they’re doing in Canada. A third of them take on social welfare and stay in the country. I know there’s 70,000 illegals in this country right now. Visas from the same issue, Australia.

 

So kind of flipping this back on the educational institution thing, one of the main issues with these institutions is they’ve jacked up the prices and made the degree so worthless that White men are not only not going to college, we don’t really feel a need for it, but now they’ve built all these fancy buildings.

 

So the way that they’re keeping the money coming in, which, by the way, the money is going to what? Fund hedge funds that are funding the military industrial complex and Zionist organizations and interests. They’re taking in foreign students to pay $60,000 to go to NYU to get their phenomenal!

 

Joel Davis: That’s a massive problem in Australia. That’s a massive problem in Australia, because in Australia, the government caps, like, college fees or university fees for Australian citizens, they don’t want Australian citizens being priced out of being able to go to university, obviously, that’s a good thing. But the cap doesn’t exist for foreign students. So then the universities are incentivized to try and bring in as many foreign students as possible because they can charge them way more foreign students a year. The foreign students aren’t paying for a degree. They’re paying for basically a way to get into Australia so that they can immigrate here.

 

And so basically they’ve converted the university system into an elaborate immigration conduit. And the entire, basically people. There’s all these complaints, you can see people on Reddit that are like university professors that say, basically the faculty is forcing me to pass all of these Indians and Asians that can barely speak English and haven’t passed any of these subjects.

 

But I have to pass 80% to 90% of the people that are enrolled. Otherwise I’m going to face disciplinary action or they’re going to stand me down.

 

So they’re just giving them, they’re not even really doing the degree properly and they’re just giving them the piece of paper. And that’s the piece of paper that they then use to immigrate here because:

 

“Oh, they’re a highly skilled member of society. They’ve got a university degree!”

 

Are they going to be a great asset to Australian society? And they go into the business sector and they’re fucking useless.

 

But then they can’t be fired because we need to have diversity quota. You know, the whole thing is a fucking, it’s a giant scam! And they say:

 

“Oh, but isn’t it great, all these immigrants coming here and contributing to our country? Aren’t they really improving things?”

 

Haven’t you noticed how everything sucks now? Haven’t you noticed how customer service is horrible everywhere? Every business is way less effective. Everything’s way more expensive than it needs to be. It’s because we have all these incompetent non-Whites that are being brought in through an elaborate scam and then insert it into all of these key positions that basically keep the economy functioning.

 

Whereas if you have White people that actually have to earn it through merit, then you get competence.

 

Now, obviously there are some competent immigrants, but as a general tendency, this is the case.

 

Also, I saw another Reddit post the other day from a Canadian, Indian. Canadian. They said:

 

“Oh, we immigrated to Canada back in the nineties to get away from all these low caste Indians. We hate being around all these low caste Indians. We wanted to have a better life.”

 

So he came to Canada, and now all those low caste Indians that we left India to get away from, now the Canadian government is bringing in, bringing them in, hundreds of thousands of them every year.

 

“So we’re going to immigrate to America to get away from them again!”

 

I mean, even the Indians don’t want these fucking Indians! You know, it’s crazy!