Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and good evening and welcome to tonight’s stream. We are live on Odysee. We are live on Rumble. We are live on DLive and we’re live on Entropy. So you can find me in all of those good places. And if one of those places decides it no longer wants to work for whatever reason, you can hop on over to another. Plenty of options there.

 

So please do spread that as well. Please share the stream tonight, share the links and let people know that this is happening, because this is a very important stream, and I think this is something that people will get a lot out of so do me a favour and share it in places I can’t share it. Unfortunately, I’m not on X, so I can’t share it there. I’m not on Facebook, so I can’t share it there. And I’m not on other mainstream social networks. I’ve shared it where I can. But if you can boost it and share it, I will be very grateful.

 

Now also, if you would like to help me, if you would like to donate to the stream, if you would like to make a financial contribution, you absolutely can do! And I are very grateful to anyone who does that you can make contributions through Entropy, which is linked in all of the live chats, or you can make contributions directly through Rumble. And when I’m not online, so if you’re watching this on replay, you can also donate through Entropy at any time or subscribe at any time through Rumble. A subscription cost just $5 a month. It’s a recurring payment. It’s a very small amount of money, but it makes a great difference to me.

 

And as I’ve said before, if enough people took out subscriptions, I would be absolutely over the moon, because that would really help me out. It’s a small amount to everyone who does it, but to me it makes a great big difference when it all adds up.

 

So you can donate to me now during the stream, and if you do donate to me during the stream and if you attach a message to it, I will absolutely ensure that I answer that message at the end. Because I will do a Q and A, or a Q and A at the end, I’m not just going to do my presentation and leave this. I am going to answer your questions, if you send those questions in. And you can send the questions via Entropy or via Rumble. And I’ll be monitoring the chats through the stream to collect all of them.

 

You can also donate via crypto-currency, all the crypto links in the description below. And finally, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Very easy. You can write to me there. Get in touch with me if you wish to.

 

Now, before we go any further, I’m going to say something that I say every time I do one of these big, more contentious presentations, and that is, can you please listen to it all?

 

Now, I always say this because there are people that dip in and dip out, and unfortunately they’ll hear something that they don’t like or that they find objectionable. But maybe I’m saying that, making an argument and I’m playing devil’s advocate, maybe they take something out of context and they get annoyed and then they send me an angry email or write a comment saying:

 

“Why did you say this?”

 

Please listen to it all. This is going to be a long stream because I’ve got a lot to say, but I think what I’ve got to say will be very helpful to a lot of people. So please do listen to it all.

 

Now the reason it’s going to be helpful and the reason you should listen to me on this is because I’ve been around for a long time. I’ve been around in this movement for 26 years, and I have been actively involved in what was Britain’s most successful ethno-nationalist political party to date, which was the British National Party at its height. And I was involved in local elections and national elections. I was involved in frontline activity and back room activity. I was the leader of the Young BNP, I was the head of publicity, and I stood for election numerous times and did proper campaigns, knocking on doors, speaking to people. I have proper experience of all of this. And I know where things can go wrong and I also know how to make things go right. So I am somebody you should listen to.

 

But also there’s another reason you should listen to me. When I first got involved in the BNP, it was around the year 2000, and back then there was a wealth of older nationalists involved in the BNP that had been involved in the 1970s.

 

So if you were sort of in your 30s in the 1970s, you’d have been in your 60s in the 2000s. If you’d have been in your 20s, in the 70s, you’d have been younger. Some people got involved at the end of the 70s, 78, 79, and these were men still in their prime and they imparted a wealth of information to people like myself, people who are active, people who would listen, people who were dedicated to the party. So I not only viewed things firsthand in the BNP at its height, and I was there for a decade, but I also have a wealth of information about where things went wrong in the 80s, in the 70s, about the factionalism, about the electoral failures, about the splits. And this is very important information. And if it’s kind of lost to time, we lose something that we should all learn from.

 

[05:31]

 

So that’s another important reason to listen to me. Not just because of the knowledge I have, but because of the knowledge that’s been handed down to me.

 

Now, I want to say this as well before we go forward. I’m not going to trash Lupert, … Rupert! Well, that’s a good start. [chuckling] I’m not going to trash Rupert Lowe tonight. There are some people out there who are ethno-nationalists and they are going out for him, and there are people who are civic nationalists going out for him.

 

And I think not all of this, but some of the people who are trashing him, trashing his team, attacking his party, trying to rubbish him, are doing this out of a degree of envy and bitterness!

 

Now, there’s a lot of bitter people in nationalism. There’s a lot of people in nationalism who have what I call “Main Character Syndrome”, where if they’re not the leader, if they’re not the last guest speaker upon stage, if they’re not the centre of attention, they have to cause endless drama, endless splits, start their own party, and then rather be in a room of 10, 12 people as the boss, than they would be in an auditorium with tens of thousands as just a local organiser, or a valued activist. And I sometimes wonder, you know, where these people would have been pre-Second World War, when Mosley was holding his giant indoor speeches, and he still has the record for the largest indoor political rally in British history.

 

And I wonder where these people would be then. You know, there’d be the people saying:

 

“Don’t back Mosley, back me!”

 

They’d be in a corner of a pub somewhere, corner of a smoky pub in the East End, talking to 10 people as Mosley was filling a stadium. And this sort of Main Character Syndrome, this bitterness, this envy, has caused a lot of people over the years to attack those who are more successful, who are better speakers, who are more able to lead. Not because they think that the person who is better qualified, you know, is actually a bad person, but because they’re jealous! Because they’re desperate to be that person and have what that person has. And that’s not just confined to nationalism, that’d be confined to lots of political spheres or found in lots of political spheres. And I’m sure there are, I will mention, some Civnats who are also attacking Rupert Lowe now out of what I believe is jealousy.

 

But I’m not going to be trashing him. So anyone who came here tonight to hear me read out all of his old tweets or talk about his time as chairman of Southampton Football Club or anything like that. That’s not what it’s going to be. This isn’t going to be a character assassination.

 

So, sadly, if you’ve come here for the character assassination, sorry, you’re gonna be disappointed. This is going to be a serious presentation that’s going to last maybe an hour and a half, maybe two hours, because there’s a lot to say. And just to reiterate, we’re going to start now. We’re going to start. But just to reiterate, listen to it all. Don’t listen to part of it, listen to it all.

 

And we’re breaking it down into three parts. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

 

And if you noticed, I use my graphic design skills to actually sort of recreate the fonts using used on the Good, the Bad and the Ugly DVD box set. When I made the graphic, which I was quite happy with, actually, I was quite happy with that graphic. Give myself a little pat on the back there for using my design skills. Hopefully you all noticed that, and if you didn’t, I pointed it out because I wanted you to notice it.

 

Anyway, we’re going to start with the Good. And the Good starts really well! Now, I like Rupert Lowe and I’ve done several streams where I’ve talked about him.

 

Now, if you watch the first stream I did about Rupert Lowe, which was Farage versus Lowe, I pointed out a few things that I was concerned about with Rupert Lowe, a few things that I was a little bit worried about, and I was a little bit critical and said:

 

“Can we trust this man?”

 

Now, I didn’t do that to trash him. I did that because I didn’t know enough about him. And when I hear that a man has come into our movement and he’s got this history of finance and banking and City of London, I’m going to be suspicious. And he’d also in the past done a few tweets supporting Israel. So I put all this together and said:

 

“Look, I can’t jump on this right away with enthusiasm.”

 

But here, several months down the line, my opinion of Rupert has improved dramatically. And I would actually say he is a great man! He seems like a great man anyway. And he’s saying all the right things. And to have a man like Rupert Lowe, who obviously appeals to a lot of people, speaks very well, he dresses properly, he looks the part, he carries himself like a leader, like a man you could imagine being Prime Minister. Having a man like that in Parliament talking, our talking points, should not be underestimated!

 

We have never, ever in the history, or post-war history of this country, had a man like Rupert Lowe in Parliament. Rupert Lowe is the first of openly ethno-nationalist MP we have had! And I am thankful for that! And I’m thankful that he speaks well. I’m thankful that he hasn’t got these skeletons in his closet, that he hasn’t got some criminal past, that he isn’t someone who was tied up in really shady shenanigans as some MPs were or are. He seems like the kind of guy that people could genuinely follow.

 

[11:42]

 

And also there is an air of authenticity about Rupert. And I’ll tell you why. Some people will doubt him, but I think he’s been on a political journey. And the reason I feel that way is if you look at him and you look at the things he’s been saying over the past few months and years, the time he spent in politics. And he isn’t a politician, that’s important. This isn’t a guy who spent his life in politics and has finally got here. This is a man who stepped up at a time in his life when he felt what most people would have felt, that he should have been winding down. The guy’s a multi-millionaire. He could have turned around and said:

 

“Look, I don’t need this. I’ve got enough money to ensure that myself, my children and my grandchildren will be looked after.”

 

He didn’t have to get involved in the fight, but he did! And he got involved in the fight and he started off in a place where, look, many people who are here today watching this stream will have started off. He started off as a bit of a Civnat. He started off as a guy who said:

 

“Look, we need to stop immigration, we do need to deport people who shouldn’t be here, the illegals, etc. But you know, lots of people come here and they can fit in, they can assimilate. And really the problem is that if people aren’t going to assimilate if they’re not going to be like us, they shouldn’t be here. And anyone can fundamentally be British, but you have to buy into who we are and respect us and speak English!”

 

He started off there. And that should be familiar to a lot of people, because a lot of us, not me! [chuckling] Look at the old documentaries, not me! But a lot of people started off there and then came to ethno-nationalism. They went on a journey. I know real people. I know some of our Regional Organisers. I know some of our guys who are our best activists who started off in the EDL [English Defence League], who started off with sort of slightly colour-blind civic nationalism, and they ended up like:

 

“We are being replaced!”

 

And some of these people are our best people. This is a familiar, real journey that gives him authenticity. This isn’t a guy who turned up yesterday and was like:

 

“Hello, fellow ethno-nationalists!”

 

Nor is it a guy who had some bizarre road to Damascus conversion from the Labour Party or the Tories. This is a guy who went on a very familiar, very authentic journey! One that I’m sure many people who are ethno-nationalists today would understand. And I know people, good friends of mine who have been in parties before, like For Britain. I know good people who have been in the EDL. I know good people who have been in parties like UKIP [UK Independence Party], who eventually woke up to ethno-nationalism and came to us. And it seems Rupert has done that. And you can actually track the tweets, you can track the change in his opinion. And I think that is really good!

 

And I think that makes him, as I said earlier, authentic. I think that makes more people believe him. I think that makes more people understand his message and say:

 

“Yes, Rupert, I started off where you started off. I started off at UKIP. I started off as a Right-wing Tory. I started off thinking this could all work if we all just learnt to live together. But now I understand we’re the indigenous people and we are being replaced.”

 

I think that’s going to make people love him even more. People like myself. I’m not saying this to just trash myself on stream or anything, but people like myself are a lot less approachable than Rupert Lowe. That’s not because I’m a bad person or I do anything particularly wrong, but I didn’t really go on that journey. I’ve been sort of sat here talking about demographics since I was 20.

 

But Rupert has gone on this journey that most people will understand. And going on this journey, speaking out, talking about indigenous Britons, talking about the fact that having a British passport doesn’t make you British. He has revitalised this movement. He has breathed new life into the ethno-nationalist movement, which was fragmented, it was fractious! It was a mixture of, if you like, sort of warlords running their own little war bands. And he’s united people behind him. And I think he’s given people hope, genuine hope! I think a lot of people were saying to themselves:

 

“Where do we go from here? Is there any realistic way of gaining power? I don’t want to join a micro party. I don’t want to be in a group that’s small and maligned, where they’re wearing face masks. Where do I go? Who do I support?”

 

You know, people have stood on an ethno-nationalist ticket, are getting 1% of the vote. Then all of a sudden, Rupert Lowe comes out. He says what he’s saying. He says it with authenticity, he says it with this sort of real purpose, and people believe! He’s breathed life into the movement, he’s revitalised it, he’s giving people hope! And it’s no surprise that 70,000 people have already signed up in a week. 70,000 people already! He had 50,000 in the first, 24 hours, another 10,000 in the next 24 hours, and over the next few days he’s had another 10,000!

 

So obviously the growth will slow off, but what a pop to get things started. 70,000 plus members!

 

[17:55]

 

And I’m going to put this into context for you, because I’ve been around the block. The BNP at its height, 14 and a half thousand members. The National Front at its height, 16 and a half thousand members. Even if you put the BNP at its height and the National Front at its height, and you plop them all together, Rupert Lowe’s members after just a week are more than double the BNP and the NF put together at their heights!

 

Now, that puts things into perspective. Never before has a man been able to make an ethno-nationalist message so mainstream! And that’s something we should applaud. That’s not something we should knock. We shouldn’t be saying:

 

“Oh, how can I pick holes in this?”

 

We should be saying, somebody in the chat saying, it’s 80,000. Everyone in the chat:

 

“It’s 80,000. Mark, it’s 80,000!”

 

Well, even better. Even better, it’s 80,000 now.

 

That eclipses the National Front and the BNP put together to an even greater degree. And that’s something we should all be happy about. You know, to say that ethno-nationalism could be more popular today than it’s ever been! Why would we be complaining? Why would we be tearing this man down? Why would we be attacking this man? For the first time in post-war history, we have this powerful ethno-nationalist party which is effectively much bigger by a huge magnitude than the National Front and the BNP put together at their heights. Brilliant! That’s a good thing!

 

And I’m going to say this is a genuine ethno-nationalist party. I’ve said this earlier, but his first tweet, the Restore Party’s first tweet was:

 

“Having a British passport doesn’t make you British!”

 

And what he’s saying here is there is something more to being British than a little booklet, a piece of paper, a rubber stamp on a form. Being British is tied to blood, to ethnicity, to your lineage! It’s tied to thousands of years of history on this soil! That is ethno-nationalism!

 

And I’m disregarding his old tweets and I’m telling you why. Because he’s been on this journey. I’m going to assess him fairly and honestly. He has come out and essentially said he’s an ethno-nationalist. And his first tweet confirmed that. It went against everything that this new “British value system” stands for. It flew in the face of Starmer, who said:

 

“He’s going to go to war with people who say things like that!”

 

He’s effectively gone to war with Starmer. We should judge him on what he does going forward, not his old tweets.

 

Let’s accept he’s been on a journey, he’s come to our position, he’s batting for us, he’s saying what needs to be said. And he is not just pulling that Overton Window by a few millimeters. He is booting that Overton Window as far to the Right as he can! And if anyone jumps up and says:

 

“Well, Mark, what about those tweets? You keep disregarding them!”

 

Well, recently he was asked if he would ban halal slaughter. He said:

 

“Yes.”

 

And people said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

And he said:

 

“Kosher!”

 

And every tweet he has sent, since then, he has said:

 

“We will ban halal and kosher slaughter.”

 

Now, I can tell you this, no Civnat party has ever said that. I remember For Britain and Marie Waters, remember them? Anne Marie Waters would go out campaigning about halal:

 

“Cruel halal slaughter!”

 

But she would never mention “kosher”. When people brought it up and said:

 

“Well, what about kosher?”

 

Her answer was always:

 

“Oh, well, this is a much smaller issue. You have to deal with the bigger issue first. The Muslim slaughterhouses are less clean, less sanitary. It’s not just about the slaughter method, it’s about this, it’s about that!”

 

She would do anything to say that she wasn’t going to ban kosher. Rupert Lowe:

 

“No, we’re banning kosher. It’s gone!”

 

Now this is something that jews would regard as “anti-semitic”. Jews would hate this! And no Civnat, Farage, Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson, none of them would ever say this! So we have got to give him the benefit of the doubt. And following this, we’ve had his great policy paper.

 

Now, unusually, really scathing of policy papers and it’s usually because they’re written by people who don’t matter.

 

You know, if you’re somebody who’s got 10 followers and you sat in your bedroom and you write a 200 page document about what you’re going to do when you get to power, you come across like a bunch of kids sat in your dad’s garden shed planning on how you’re going to build the moon base, when you get to the moon. You’re not getting there. Not being funny, you’re not getting there! You’re kids! You’re planning on building a rocket and you’re planning it all out and you’re talking about how the moon base is going to operate. It’s never going to happen when you’ve got 10 people and that’s it.

 

There’s no point writing a 200 page piece of policy. You write those kind of in-depth policy papers when you are knocking on the door of power, when you’re in Parliament. They have weight then!

 

[23:50]

 

And this is what I’ve always said, if you go back over all of my old streams, I have been consistent on this navel gazing desire to write:

 

“The best hundred page policy document on immigration, or the Green Agenda?”

 

Waste of everyone’s time. Absolute waste of everyone’s time! Unless you’re an MP and you have some clout. And this policy paper published by Rupert Lowe. Fantastic! Fantastic! One of the best I’ve ever read. You know, you got to give this man a pat on the back.

 

And look, I’m going to be really honest now. This where we are today with Rupert Lowe. 80,000 members, a genuine ethno-nationalist party with an MP at the helm is where we should be. This is where the BNP should have been today. The BNP should be where Restore is today. And if the BNP had had a credible leader, if it had been run correctly, maybe we could have been. But we weren’t. It went down in 2010, it was dead in 2014! It couldn’t really be resurrected then. That was when it was knocked down so heavily in 2010, it never really got up.

 

But the last life left the BNP in 2014, when the last seat was lost in European Parliament, in one of the most humiliating ways imaginable. This is where we could have been, it’s where we should have been, and it’s where we would have been if we’d have done things right.!

 

And looking at this, to me, in some ways it feels like we’ve kind of got this second chance. It feels like many of us felt that the last real chance was in the 2000s with the BNP. And here we are in 2026 and it’s almost like we’ve been granted this second chance, this second chance of a proper ethno-nationalist party. And for that I am thankful.

 

And this is the thing. Rupert has a real credible chance of getting people elected. Let’s not ignore that! He has a real chance of getting people elected. This is not a micro party. This is not a party that has double or triple digit membership numbers. This is a genuine political party.!

 

And this takes me on to another one of the good points of all this. And this is a bit of a patented Mark Collett, “I told you so”. But Rupert Lowe has proved me right over the micro parties.

 

Now, for the past few years, I have said that all of these Right-wing micro parties are a terrible thing! They are a waste of time! They needed to be wiped away. And I’ve also said that they’re run by these narcissistic fools who have to be leader. They have to be the main character in the story. You know, they’ve got a severe case of main character syndrome. And I said these micro parties will never, ever get anywhere. All they will be is these squabbling tiny groups that get absolutely drugged in elections, but keep conning their few supporters into believing that they are one day going to be a Parliamentary party. But Rupert Lowe has just swept them away in the stroke of a pen, he’s destroyed them all. And that’s actually what I predicted. If people look back and remember, I said some time ago that one of the great weaknesses of the micro party is as soon as a man with a bigger following and a larger purse comes along the micro parties are effectively dead. And they are! And this is good.

 

And it’s good because now ethno-nationalists can stop wasting their time. These parties needed to be wiped off the map. They needed to be shown up for what they are. And ethno-nationalists can do proper work now. They can either get involved with Restore. So if you’re in one of these micro parties and you want to get elected, get involved with Restore.

 

And if you want to be part of a street movement, get involved with a street movement. But don’t sit there following some jumped up little failed narcissist around, thinking that your party of 12 people is going to get to where Rupert Lowe is, because you’re not! You know, you’ve spent three, four years getting 250 members. He’s got 80,000 in a week! Let’s be real.!

 

And the reason this is in the good section of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly is because this is a wake up call. This is a slap around the face. It’s a cold bucket of water chucked over your head in the morning that gets you out of bed, on your feet. This is what nationalism needed for many reasons. This has proved me right, which I’m happy about, but it’s what we needed. Our people needed to see and to understand that wasting our time getting 1% in council elections was an absolute farce! It was a humiliation ritual! Let’s draw a line under it and let’s call out any of the people still operating these micro parties.

 

You know, and that doesn’t just count for ethno-nationalists, it also counts for civic nationalists. You know, it’s not just these ethno-nationalist micro parties that are doing it.

 

There’s also David Kurten and the Heritage Party. David, if you’re watching, I really like you. I think you’re a funny guy. I’d have you on my show. If I met you. I’d shake you by the hand. I think a lot of what you say makes real sense, but come on, mate, the Heritage Party are not getting to power. You’ve been eclipsed in less than a week, easily. You know, you’re somewhere there and Rupert somewhere up there. It’s time to close them down. We don’t need UKIP anymore. We don’t need the Heritage Party. We don’t need the NRP or the BNP or Homeland. All these parties have been rendered useless overnight. That’s a good thing. If we’re into politics, if we’re into electoral politics we need to get behind the most likely organisation to win!

 

Because if you’re not behind the most likely organisation to win, you’re actually in a very real way part of the problem.

 

[30:35]

 

Now, I said earlier, this moves the Overton Window, and it does. But it moves it in a way it’s never been moved before. It’s one thing for large groups of people to say things, it’s one thing for people like myself or somebody like Nick Griffin or somebody in the BNP to say these things. It’s different though, even for celebrities. You know, you might have something like John Cleese say:

 

“London isn’t English anymore!”

 

Well, great! I’m pleased he said that. But for a sitting MP to say this and to say this with Parliamentary privilege, this is a game changer! People don’t understand how important this is. We have never had an ethno-nationalist MP before.

 

And this is not just an ethno-nationalist MP, but it’s an ethno-nationalist MP who is independently wealthy, doesn’t need to go to people for funding. I mean, apparently the guy made something like 34 million. I think I heard him say that in an interview of one particular share deal. Well, this guy’s got so much money he could look after his family for the rest of their natural lives. For the rest of his grandkids natural lives, probably his great grandchildren several generations onward, and still fund this party without even noticing the money’s gone. This guy could effectively run a campaign that would easily eclipse the BNP’s best campaign and he wouldn’t know the money had gone. This is a good thing. This is a very good thing for the Overton Window. And it justifies all our points.

 

For years people like myself have been on the outside, locked out, hidden away, not allowed to speak, called Mad Men. Well, we were right all along. And this guy is justifying that. And he’s making our points not from a position of weakness where we make our points, but from a position of strength. And when these points are made from a position of strength and authority, they carry more weight. This is a good thing.

 

But there is one final thing I want to talk about that’s really good! I remember sitting in on Sam Melia’s trial when Sam Melia was stitched up! And I’ll tell you this, the thing the barrister said to him when he was questioning, everything was belittled:

 

“Well, who in the mainstream holds your views? You’re just a madman! The people you look up to are strange people who stream online. No one in the establishment feels this way. You’re so far from the mainstream that you’re a threat to us all, Sam Melia!”

 

Well, if Sam Melia was on trial today, things would be different. Nationalists who go on trial will not be faced with the question of:

 

“Why are you a freak, an outlier, an extremist?”

 

Because you can just fire back:

 

“Well, if I’m an extremist, so is Rupert Lowe, a sitting MP, and so are his 80,000 members!”

 

All of a sudden, this is different. He’s got the level of membership now that the Lib-Dems have. This is massive! And it gives us legitimacy, it gives us protection and it will also change the way the courts, the police and the CPS treat us. Because the things that I’ve been saying on these streams for years are now being said in Parliament. This is good!

 

And anyone that’s poo-pooing this, anyone that’s saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not really this!”

 

Look, forget it! That isn’t going to wash. You can’t argue against the positives of Rupert Lowe. You can’t argue against the way he’s putting over our arguments. And you can’t argue with over the fact this will offer us protection and it will also allow people who were scared to speak, the strength to speak. Don’t underestimate that either. There are going to be lots of people who’ve always felt this way but never said it, because the only person saying it was Mark Collett or Nick Griffin or John Tyndall.

 

But now the man saying is a sitting MP, the former chairman of Southampton Football Club, a multi-millionaire, a farmer, a man of the people! This is important. And it may well do for us what politicians have done elsewhere in the world, for different White countries, White nations, that now are waking up en masse and talking about things they weren’t before, because people in positions of power are saying what the people think and that gives the people strength. All of this is good and I’m hoping it will bring more people to our thinking.

 

Because this is all part of what I would call “The Great Awakening”. All of this is part of a process of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe hopefully millions of White Britons waking up to the reality of ethnicity, race, nation and the importance of bloodlines, lineage and not being replaced! And that’s what we’re all about. Remember, the goal here isn’t to have the biggest micro party. The goal here isn’t to be the last surviving tiny nationalist organisation to rule them all. The goal here is to wake people up, to make change and to ensure a future for our people.

 

And that means either A) making sure we aren’t replaced, or B), making sure that we have communities, that we have our own power bases if we are replaced and become minorities in certain areas of the country, depending on how things go forward. So that’s the good of I think there’s plenty of good there.

 

But with the good, the bad and the ugly, there’s also the bad and the ugly. And we’re going to start now with the bad for everything I’ve just said, these are early days, very early days! It’s less than a week old, and when you’re going through the early days, things always seem good. This is what you would call the honeymoon phase. This is the point where everyone is giving Rurpert Lowe the benefit of the doubt. It’s the point where everyone who wants to believe will think the best of Rupert Lowe. It’s the point where everything is fresh, where we can shoot for the moon, we can go all the way to the top. We can win everything, because we’ve never been tested. It’s like when an army marches off to war singing songs, believing that by Christmas the war will be over. They’re so sure of themselves. And before the first shots are fired, there is that feeling that anything can be achieved. And unfortunately, that isn’t reality. Unfortunately, there is a long fight ahead.

 

[37:54]

 

And at the moment, as we sing songs and march off together talking about how the glorious victory is on the horizon, Restore and Rupert are yet to fight the first battle. The first engagement hasn’t even happened. And whilst the guys marching off under his banner are singing songs now, they might not be singing songs quite as loudly or harmoniously when first contact occurs. When that first battle occurs, often morale changes dramatically.

 

And sometimes the first battle goes well and people will be like:

 

“Mark, I remember your stream when you said when the first battle comes, things may change!”

 

Sometimes you can be on the up. The BNP was on the up for 10 years when it finally got its knock, when it was finally knocked down, when it finally met its match, the damage done was so catastrophic it couldn’t recover. So bear in mind, we are in a honeymoon period. Things feel good now. There’s hope, People are buzzing.

 

But all of that masks problems that lie beneath the surface, that veneer of:

 

“Yes, we can do this! Yes, 80,000! Yes, ethno-nationalism! Yes, great interviews on TV! Yes, that tweet about being British being tied to ethnicity and to a lineage!”

 

All of that is making this honeymoon so good! And people are filled with all this hope. But that’s the honeymoon period. And later down the line, the marriage might not be as rosy as the honeymoon period. And I use the word “marriage” there for a very specific reason. A very specific reason, because Rupert Lowe is involved in a marriage of sorts. Rupert Lowe is bringing together many disparate groups. There are many factions uniting under Rupert’s banner to march off to war together. It is a courage of so many different supporters. You have just to name three. Tommy Robinson, you have Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin, you have Steve Laws and Zoomer. But that’s a toxic brew! That Steve Laws is a great guy, by the way. I’m not knocking Steve here. There are good people, good people supporting Rupert like Steve Laws.

 

But there are people that we wouldn’t like as much. You have the arch super Zionist Civnat football hooligan Tommy Robinson! Who for years has run his grift and worked for Israel. You have Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad who is dipping his toe into ethno-nationalism. But this man was a libertarian. This man was a race blind Civnat who believed that fundamentally anyone could be British if they subscribed to our value system. And you’ve got people like Steve Laws, who is a re-migration absolutist.

 

“Everyone must go! Every last one must go!”

 

Are these people gonna play nicely together? Are these people going to form an organisation together that will be stable? Or are they going to be factional rifts?

 

And like I said, they might all play nicely together on the honeymoon. They might all march off towards that first conflict singing songs together and not holding grudges. But when those first shots are fired and things don’t go so well, will they play nicely then? Will they be still singing in harmony? Will the marriage work when the couple come back from the honeymoon and realise that maybe whilst it was all good when they were sitting in the Bahamas drinking cocktails and enjoying the White Sandy beaches, their relationship doesn’t work as well when they’re back in rainy England in a little box having to do a 9 to 5 job, look after screeching children [chuckling] and keep the house, keeping the house tidy and paying the bills, things change. And things change a lot when organisations go through their growing pains. And I think there’s a lot there.

 

And I said a long time ago on the Farage versus Lowe stream, I said one problem that Lowe may have is he may surround himself. And this exact term I use was with a “toxic witch’s brew” of influencers, grifters and other ne’er-do-wells who all want a piece of him and want to drag him in different directions. And he’s been on an interview already with Sargon of Akkad, with Carl Benjamin. He’s on the Lotus Eaters! Well, how did that work out for poor old Gerard Batten? Remember, there is slight precedent for this. There is precedent for everyone getting behind a new leader to take on Farage. They all got behind Gerard Batten and it was a disaster! It went down like the Titanic. It was the Hindenburg of political experiments. It went down in flames. UKIP were completely destroyed. Nigel Farage stomped them so hard that he won the European election with the Brexit Party and left UKIP without a single seat. And he did that with the vote being split. Don’t forget that.

 

And remember, when you have all these people on board, when you have all of these different groups on board, when you have this witch’s brew, how is Rupert Lowe to respond to this? Who is he going to side with? How is he going to wave away the indiscretions? How is he going to wave away Tommy’s criminal past, his football hooliganism, all of the things that he’s involved in that put normal people off voting for him? And normal people won’t vote for Tommy. Tommy stood for elections and it was a disaster! How is he going to wave away Sargon’s indiscretions? Sargon, the man who famously sent rape tweets to Jess Phillips! I’m sort of quoting the media there. I’m not saying he actually did that allegedly, but that’s what the media said. Sargon’s also had some fruity interviews that people love quoting.

 

Rupert’s gonna have to answer for all of this, but he’s also going to have to answer for other people. If he teams up with Steve Laws, he’s going to have to answer why Steve says that every last person must go, even if they’ve got a drop of blood that isn’t White British. He’s going to have to answer for everyone’s comments.

 

[45:01]

 

And this is one of the reasons I haven’t got involved. This is one of the reasons I didn’t join up, because I don’t want him to have to answer for Young Nazi and Proud and all the things that I’ve said. [chuckling] I don’t want him to have to answer for what Mark Collett has said in the past. Because that’s not fair! And I actually do want him to be successful.

 

But all these people who are jumping on board with him, or some of them might not actually want him to be successful. They might be riding his coattails. They might be thinking, what can they get out of that? And really, you have here a very unstable support base, and you’re already seeing the beginning of infighting between these different supporters. You’ve got the Civnats already saying they wouldn’t sit with the people who support Steve Laws and Zoomer. You’ve got people like Tommy who will want to drag Rupert down the Zionist route. And there’s lots of people supporting Rupert who are ardent anti-zionists. And already they are saying:

 

“We don’t want Rupert having a Friends of Israel group.”

 

There are going to be some serious fractures in this when we get past the honeymoon period. Bringing people together who have such disparate views and who take their, what may be relatively small differences to those looking from the outside in, but they take those differences very seriously. This is going to be hard to manage. Holding his support base together is going to be very difficult.

 

And look, Nigel Farage gets accused of a lot of things. He gets accused of cucking all of the time. He gets accused of selling people out. He gets accused of throwing people under the bus, because he does! Nigel Farage disassociates with people when they use racial slurs or when they express openly Nazi views. He throws people under the bus when people say things which would be perceived as scary or racist. And we all have a go at him for that. We all say:

 

“Look, Nigel, you’re a cuck! You’re a man who won’t stick up for his own supporters, his own party members!”

 

And to that, well, I’m going to say this. Let’s look at both sides of this argument.

 

So on one hand, you hear me going on a BBC interview and I don’t throw anyone under the bus. I defend them all. And I smile and laugh in the face of the BBC reports. I’m like:

 

“I’m not kicking this guy out. He’s my friend. He’s got a right to his opinion! So what if he said this? I don’t care!”

 

And I can say that because I’m Mark Collett and I’m in charge of Patriotic Alternative. But Patriotic Alternative is not an electoral party. We are not a party that has to do well in elections to continue doing what we’re doing.

 

However, Nigel Farage is in charge of Reform. And Reform is graded on one thing alone. It’s graded on its electoral success. That is what every party is graded on. There is nothing else. It’s electoral success or nothing. I’ve said this before. There is one thing worse, sometimes for political parties than losing. There’s one thing worse than losing an election, and it can be winning an election. Because when you win an election, you have to do even better at the next election.

 

And that was one of the problems that hurt the BNP. I always remember the BNP started doing really well and then everyone expected it to do even better at the next elections. Sometimes it did. But when the BNP stumbled and things didn’t go so well, people left, people abandoned the party, people got dispirited and walked away. The problem with winning in the short term is you raise the bar for yourself. It’s like basically saying:

 

“Well, I want to be the world record high jumper. I want to be the best high jumper in the world.”

 

Well, at first it’s easy because you’re getting over the bar with relative ease, but the higher you jump, the higher you have to jump to keep impressing people. It’s the same with party politics. And Farage, he may be a cuck, but when he goes on television, people can’t credibly call him a Nazi, or a racist. When he goes on television, he doesn’t have to answer for what 2, 3, 4 dozen people have said on Facebook and Twitter because he kicked them out. And yeah, he’s a cuck, he’s a cuck!

 

But I remember when I was in the BNP, and I remember every time there was an interview, every time Nick Griffin went on an interview, Nick Griffin had to answer for what dozens of people had said. He had to answer for Mark Collett and Young Nazi and Proud. He had to answer for Tony Lecomber and Tony Lecomber’s ill spent youth where he took a oversized firework to a Left-wing bookshop with the intention of blowing it up. You know, they called him Tony the Bomber Lecomber!

 

And I’m not having to go at Tony, but what I am saying is Nick had to answer for him. Nick had to answer for me. He had to answer for numerous people. I remember in the run up to one of the local elections, one of the newspapers ran a headline called “All Women All Nazis” and it was basically a front page that pictured all the women who stood for the BNP that had said or done slightly fruity things.

 

[50:59]

 

And then somebody has to go, whether it was Nick Griffin or Simon Darby. Somebody has to go on TV and answer that. And it meant every one of your interviews was maybe 20 minutes long. And it was 15 minutes of answering:

 

“Well, this Nazi said, this racist said this!”

 

And it made the party far less electable than it could have been. Now, to the credit of the BNP, we stood by our people and we didn’t cuck. But the party doesn’t exist anymore. Nigel Farage does cuck. And it’s very hard for them to call him a racist, or a Nazi. And because of that, he’s far more electable. Because the British people are scared of terms like racist and Nazi. People say:

 

“Oh, well, I’m not scared of it anymore. People are less scared than they used to be.”

 

Well, maybe not. But this does make a difference. And I’ve been there, I’ve seen it, I’ve lived it, I know it! And this brings us to the next point. And people are going to be very upset that I’m saying this, but this is a warts and all breakdown.

 

Let’s discuss the Nazi question!

 

At some point, Rupert Lowe is going to be held up, and he is going to have to answer for someone in his party who has supported Hitler, who has called somebody a racial slur, somebody who said that they wish the outcome of the Second World War was different. Maybe somebody who said:

 

“Well, we need a man like the Austrian painter today, because if he was going to invade Britain today, I certainly wouldn’t be Manning the gun turrets. I’d be pointing him all the way to Downing Street!”

 

People will say that! They say it in Reform, [chuckling] so they’re gonna say it in Rupert Lowe’s party! Because Rupert is going to take a lot of people that Reform wouldn’t take. That’s a fact. And Rupert Lowe is going to have to go on TV at some point and answer for people in his organisation that have said things like that, in his party that have said things like that. How will he react? Will he cuck? I don’t know. Will he not cuck? I don’t know. But I’ll tell you one thing. When people go down this party political route, the pressure to sell out and to cuck and to chuck your friends under the bus is huge! Because there’s always somebody stood behind the curtain whispering in your ear:

 

“If you just get rid of them, people will get on board! If you just stop saying this, people will get on board! If you just remove paragraph 2 of your statement on deportation, people will get on board! If you just get rid of your forced repatriation policy and make it voluntary, people will get on board!”

 

And the BNP went through that. The BNP dropped things. The BNP dropped its forcd repatriation policy under, was it Nick Griffin or was it John Tyndall? I can’t remember. I think it was Nick Griffin and the forced repatriation. Yeah, it was under Nick Griffin. Nick Griffin dropped the forced repatriation policy because it was deemed to be unfair, unjust and the public couldn’t get behind it. He said:

 

“Look, we do need people going back, but it has to be done on a voluntary paid basis! A voluntary paid basis because we can’t sell to the people that we’re going to go door to door dragging people out the house.”

 

This was Nick Griffin in the BNP. So what’s Rupert Lowe going to do? How’s he going to answer these questions now? My answer is, I don’t know! I can’t tell you, because I can’t. I’m good at making predictions, but I don’t have a crystal ball that gives me the exact future. But when he’s on TV, when he’s got that desire for more members, when he’s got that desire for an extra 0.5% on the vote, when he wants to go even mains more mainstream than he has, the pressure will be poured on him. Nigel Farage caved into that pressure and it has undoubtedly worked for Nigel Farage. The BNP didn’t, we didn’t. We were more hardcore, we were more principled. We stuck by our people. And PA absolutely sticks by its people!

 

But the fact is the BNP never achieved what it could have achieved. Two MEPs was the high point. A member of the GLA. All we ever achieved was big wins in proportional representation elections. We never won big First Past the Post elections. And that’s going to hurt people’s feelings! But it’s true! Look it up! You can get mad at what I’m saying, it can upset you, what I’m saying. You can download the video, but what I’m saying is true!

 

Now, as I said earlier, this is why I haven’t joined.

 

This is why I don’t want to be involved. I support the guy, I like what he’s saying. But if Mark Collett got involved and Rupert Lowe had to answer for what member number 80, 256 said, and member number 80, 256 said:

 

“I’m drawn to a racially pure White society!”

 

I said that in an interview with a newspaper when I was in my early 20s, probably about 20 years old, maybe 21. I said on TV, I made jokes about things that I probably shouldn’t have joked about. They were silly, they were crass, they were embarrassin, looking back on them! I don’t want Rupert to have to answer for that. And I don’t want him to have to, every time he goes on TV they say:

 

“Well, what about Mr. Young Nazi and Proud? What about him, eh? What are you gonna do about him?”

 

But he’s gonna have to do that with someone else, and thankfully it ain’t gonna be me and we’ll see how we react. But if I was a betting man, which I’m not, I’d say there’ll be more cucking than a lot of people now will like to think there will be. Because the allure of power and the allure of going mainstream is usually too great for most people. And once you’re in that party political sphere, even if you’re the BNP, there is some cucking!

 

[57:23]

 

Now, the next point of the bad is, can he actually succeed with this ethno-nationalist argument?

 

Now, I was talking about this earlier night on PWR with Hugh Anthony. There is this sort of feeling that as things get worse, which they are doing, as more migrants come here, more people are going to vote for an ethno-nationalist alternative. And that might be true, but as more migrants come here, inevitably there is more integration. There are 21 million people living in Britain who are not classified as White British, so have some kind of migrant background. And unfortunately this is a hard pill to swallow. So get your glass of toxic blue energy drink, get your cup of tea, whatever you need to help you swallow the pill, because it’s coming.

 

Unfortunately, many White Britons are more bothered about how they will be perceived by their one non-White friend, non-White family member, non-White work colleague, than they are about the future of their own race.

 

This is because we have this suicidal empathy. We have a problem as a people. We are more bothered about the feelings of our one of the one non-White outlier that we like than we are about the future of our people. Now that’s not the people here tonight, that’s not the people watching this stream because we are the die hard ethno-nationalists, the people who find Mark Collett on Rumble and Odysee, even though he’s banned on everywhere else. But we are outliers. And Rupert Lowe has got to sort, has got to sell that to the public. Can it be sold? Yes, there are more people than ever angry about immigration, but there are more people than ever before with mixed race family members, with nephews and nieces and grandsons and granddaughters and daughters who have married black men and sons who have gone to Thailand and brought back a Thai bride. There are more people than ever before who have a non-White friend. These are problems that Rupert Lowe will have to face.

 

And why am I saying this? Why am I bringing this up when I talked about it the other night? I’m bringing this up because there’s a lot of people who support Rupert Lowe’s that are real ideologues and say:

 

“Look, not one drop, not one member, not one person!”

 

Well, I’m going to tell you now, Rupert Lowe will have non-White people in the party. Rupert Lowe will have people standing for him who are not White British. That is going to happen. And this is going to be interesting because there’s a lot of people in our movement, there’s a lot of ethno-nationalists who have said over the last few years:

 

“Look, there’s Farage with another non-White candidate. There’s a Pakistani candidate standing for Reform, there’s an Indian candidate standing for Reform, there’s a White woman standing for Reform. And look, she’s got a black husband and three mixed race children!”

 

There is a real likelihood that Rupert Lowe will do this as well. And at this point, how are people going to react? Are people going to say:

 

“Yeah, we’re going to forgive that.”

 

Or are they going to react to him in the same way that they reacted to Farage? Are they going to react to him in the same hostile way? Are they going to start calling him a cuck and nagging him and throwing mud at him? Or are they just going to get their head down and carry on? Because this is going to happen.

 

And it’s going to happen for several reasons. Because firstly, I don’t think Rupert Lowe is a racist. I think black man came to Rupert Lowe and said he wanted to stand for him. I don’t think Rupert Lowe would have a bad word to say to him, number one.

 

And secondly, it would be illegal to stop those people coming forward and standing as candidates anyway. And if you were found to be stopping candidates from standing solely on the basis of their race, you’d be in big trouble and your party would likely be deregistered and you would be facing a massive lawsuit from the Equalities Commission. So this is going to happen. How will people deal with it? I don’t know!

 

Now the next thing I want to talk about, which is the bad, is how Rupert is going to sell re-migration. And this is a big issue because, look, I believe in re-migration, but I’m not one of these people who goes around parroting “re-migration is inevitable”. Remigration is absolutely not inevitable.

 

And when you look at what Trump’s done in America, the few deportations that have actually happened over there, the hostile environment that is perceived to have been built against migrants, it’s actually scared the crap out of lots of White people! At one point, Whites were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to do some deportations!”

 

You see one Somalian family on the news with handcuffs on being led off, and all of a sudden, half the White people who wanted deportations are terrified! You got people like Joe Rogan who were like:

 

“Yeah, we need to sort this country out! Oh, my God, Trump’s going too far. This is like Hitler 2.0!”

 

What I’m saying here is Rupert Lowe has to not only get over the Nazi issue, the cucking issue, has to bring all these disparate groups together and make them play nice, but he also has to sell something that does, to some degree, scare people. And when it gets implemented and people see the reality of it scares some people who voted for it. And I’ve likened this to making an omelet. There are people out there that will go to the chef and say:

 

“I want an omelette. Please make me a large omelette!”

 

And the chef’s like:

 

“Sure.”

 

Starts breaking the eggs.

 

[xx:xx]

 

And then the guys order the omelettes in tears:

 

“Oh, what are you doing? What are you doing? They’re breaking all these eggs. It’s bloody terrible. Stop breaking the eggs!”

 

“But you wanted the omelet.”

 

“Yeah, I want the omelette.”

 

“Well, I need to break the eggs.”

 

“But I don’t want any eggs getting broken!”

 

You’d be a madman. But that’s how White people behave. I’m not talking about you guys in the chat. I’m not talking about the good ethno-nationalists here. I’m talking about the people who’ve been infected with the disease of suicidal empathy. Look:

 

“There’s a load of migrant rapists down there. Deport them!”

 

“Right, let’s get the handcuffs on, boys.”

 

“What are you handcuffing families for?”

 

“Well, you said deport them.”

 

“Well, there’s a woman there who’s been handcuffed.”

 

“Yeah, she’s the wife of one of the guys that was raping the little girls, and she helped cover it up. She gave false evidence in court.”

 

“Yeah, but she’s a woman and she’s pregnant. Oh!”

 

“So what? Get rid of them!”

 

And you’ve got to remember Rupert Lowe again. They should have gone in the good section, is a principled guy. One of the reasons he fell out with Farage is both him and Farage agreed that people who had groomed and sexually abused White girls must be deported. But Rupert went further and said:

 

“We’re not just deporting the ones who did the grooming and committed the crimes. We’re going to deport the communities and the families that were accomplices, that covered for it, that sheltered this, that knew about it and didn’t report it to the police.”

 

I agree with him! Brilliant! Amazing policy. And Farage. Screw you for not supporting that! Screw you, Farage, for being a sellout! But unfortunately, re-migration is not inevitable. It’s a hard sell at times because our people are so bloody weak! This is an issue. It’s an issue he will face.

 

And it’s not just an issue when it comes to the ballot box. It’s an issue when it comes to people like Tommy Robinson. When it comes to people like Sargon. What’s Sargon gonna say if Rupert Lowe says:

 

“We need to start handcuffing families.”

 

You know, just the other day, Tommy Robinson was outside the Iranian embassy talking about how we need more Iranians here because the Iranian community, community in Britain is brilliant! Well, no, it’s not. No, it’s not, Tommy! Iranian nationalists and Iranian nationals living in Britain are 18 times more likely to be arrested for sexual crimes than White British men. 18 times! We don’t need them here. Tommy would be crying. He’d be weaponizing his supporters. If Rupert Lowe really embarked on a proper campaign of re-migration, a lot of his support base, their knees would start trembling, because we have a mental disease as a people! Our empathy, which should be solely focused on people within our group, has been spread to everyone!

 

So now we’re more empathetic to other people than we are our own people. We have more empathy for the communities that do horrible things to us than we do to the White victims of those foreign communities! Now, what I’m saying is not a lie. It’s true. This is how it works.

 

Unfortunately, Rupert Lowe is going to have to overcome this. And this is not just a problem he’ll have to overcome with the electorate, but with people within his own ranks.

 

Now, the final part of the bad is this. 80,000 members, it seems like a lot, but the Green Party have over 170,000 members, and they only get 9% of the vote. He’s got less than half of what the Green Party have got. What’s that going to get him? 4%? Maybe more, maybe less. I don’t know. People might say they’ll end up with 170,000 members by the next general election. Great! But 9% of the vote wouldn’t cut it. Maybe getting one or two seats nationwide. A lot of what we’re seeing now is talk on social media, talk on YouTube, and it can be a bubble! It can be this horrible situation where you think you have more support than you do.

 

I remember and I’ve spoke to Steve Laws about this today. He’s given me permission to use this as an example. I’m not negging Steve. We’re going to talk more about this later, actually, but I’m going to introduce this now. Steve Laws, hundreds of thousands of followers across different social media platforms, yet when he stands in election, he gets just over 1%.

 

Now, that’s not to knock Steve. Steve’s a fantastic guy! And Steve bloody deserved to win those elections. He’d have made a great councillor and a great MP. But often you can have millions of followers, you could have thousands of people sign up and you can think everything is gonna go well. But it doesn’t result in much. Tommy Robinson can put 300,000 people on the streets, but when he stood in election, he got nowhere. He failed dismally.

 

Gerard Batten, look at all the influencers he got on board. Look at the social media imprint he built. Absolutely smashed! Things that happen on X don’t necessarily transfer to the real world. It wasn’t that long ago that the Homeland Party were being bigged up and everyone was like:

 

“Look the re-migration is going to begin soon!”

 

They got trashed. They got the most embarrassing results any ethno-nationalist party has ever got in local council elections. And that was when everyone was talking them up. The problem is, we get so close to this. We get so when you’re so close to something and you focus so much on something that’s right in front of you, you can’t see the big picture.

 

[1:09:17]

 

And also, when you’re close to something, perspective makes you believe it’s bigger than it really is. You end up only speaking to the people who tell you:

 

“Well, I’m voting for you, mate. I’m on board. This tweet’s got 40,000 likes. That’s going to get us over the line!”

 

It doesn’t work like that. It didn’t work like that in the BNP. Back in the day you could get a meeting going in part of Leeds and there’d be so many people that there was standing room only. You would be out on the street, people would be beeping their horn. Everyone was voting for you down the Working Men’s Club. And you got 20%. And labour won the vote with like 45%. They won it easily.

 

The problem is you don’t speak to everyone. You speak to people within your bubble. And when it comes down to it, there’s going to be all these pressures. There’s going to be these disparate supporters. You’re going to have the dirty members, the Nazis. There’s going to be pressure on him to clean his party up. There’s going to be pressure on him. There’s going to be the kosher money, the jewish influence.

 

Now there’s people like me who’ve been doing this for 26 years. I’ve never cucked! But where am I today? [chuckling] I mean not to rubbish myself, but I’m nowhere. I’m sat on Rumble and Odysee, you know, streaming to 500 people! Now that’s what not cucking gets you. I can go to sleep with a clean conscience and a smile on my face because I’ve never cucked, and I’ve always talked about the important things. But I’m not getting elected to Parliament, am I? And this is gonna be a big issue. Men are easily corrupted! And at the moment he’s doing a good job of not being corrupted. But when he gets the tap on the shoulder, are we going to see the purges? Are we going to see the multiracial candidate slates? Are we going to see the Restore Friends of Israel? I hope not. I hope not! He is going to have to do some of those things. He will have non-White candidates, but I hope he doesn’t go down this route that I’ve just laid out.

 

But I think to some degree he will because he’s going to be pulled in that direction by people who are part of his supporter base. And that supporter’s base is somewhat of a toxic witch’s brew.

 

So that’s the bad! So are you guys ready for the ugly?

 

Because there is an ugly.

 

And what is going to be the ugliest part of this is the fight between Rupert Lowe and Restore and Nigel Farage and Reform. That fight is going to be the most bitter and horrible thing you can imagine. There will be all sorts of dirty Tricks. There will be stolen membership lists, there will be people emailing people using those membership. There’ll be all sorts, all sorts of nasty games!

 

And I’ll tell you this now, the bitterness and the hatred between those two parties will eclipse the bitterness and hatred those two parties have for Labour and the Tories. Restore and Reform will spend more time fighting each other than they will fighting the Reds. And I know this because I have seen splits in nationalism. I’ve lived through them. I’ve seen the hatred they build.

 

And we saw this when Homeland split away from PA, there was people in Homeland, and I’ve been told this by an ex-Homeland member who I met the other weekend and reconciled with at the Warwick demo. And he said to me:

 

“One of the things that never sat easily with him was the amount of people in that organisation who spent the majority of their time creating fake profiles to spread rumours about PA.”

 

They spent more time doing that than they did actually campaigning for Homeland. That’s one of the reasons it failed.

 

There was one guy who was particularly bitter and nasty and he would spend his evenings ringing around our young members saying:

 

“Look, I know you’re gonna stay with PA and I’m cool with that, but I just I’m not saying you should come to Homeland, but PA are going to be banned in two weeks. We’ve had a big tip off, and I’m just letting you know because I don’t want you getting arrested and being part of a banned organisation!”

 

Well, that never happened. But that’s the kind of horribleness that goes on. And when that horribleness goes on, it doesn’t actually benefit either of the parties that are engaged in it.

 

In fact, most people who are exposed to that kind of infighting and negativity will end up just leaving the movement altogether. They just leave both parties because they didn’t get involved for that. Most normal people don’t get involved to be embroiled in this horrible, horrible infighting! That’s just how it is.

 

And unfortunately, we’re already seeing that because people have been celebrating all weekend:

 

“There are new Restore Party councillors. There are new., …”

 

Well, they’re not. They’re just Reform Party councillors that have gone to Restore. There hasn’t been a single new Restore Party candidate voted in, not a single actual victory. All there’s been is Reform going to Restore.

 

[1:14:58]

 

So the number of populist Right councillors has remained exactly the same. People are just saying:

 

“Oh, well, we took some off you. We didn’t take seats from the Labour Party.”

 

Restore haven’t got three new councils elected and cost Labour three seats. Restore haven’t just taken a council away from the Tory Party and actually smashed part of the establishment. All they’ve done is pull people away from another populist Right party. And the anger here, unfortunately will be aimed more at Nigel Farage and what Reform are doing than it will be at Keir Starmer and what Keir Starmer is doing.

 

And this totally mirrors what happened in Russia when the Bolsheviks came to power. The Red Army was a united force. The White army wasn’t. The resistance to the Bolsheviks was disunited. The generals wouldn’t talk to each other, wouldn’t share information with each other, wouldn’t work together, wouldn’t fight alongside each other because they all had these little problems with each other and they lost. Rather than standing together as one. They were eaten piecemeal by the Bolsheviks and crushed. And what did that lead to? Well, we all know, and as I said all of this fighting will cause more people to drop out than it will to move over to other organisations.

 

Just look at what happened in the National Front. The National Front split in 1980 and it became the New National Front. There was another split in 1986 which became the Flag National Front. You know, at certain times there were actually two National Front paper sales on the same street in the same city centre selling a paper that talked about exactly the same issues. And the public would have been like:

 

“Didn’t I just see you down there?”

 

“No, no, they’re a totally different organisation!”

 

And that bitterness, these internal strives, these fights are things that weigh the movement down. They weigh the movement down and what they end up doing is putting more people off. Because look, we’re not normies. The people watching this stream tonight, we are not normies. That’s just not who we’re not people who have come to this movement as normal sort of hanger on people. I’m not saying we’re all weirdos or anything, but we’re just not normies. We’re not part of normal life. We, we’re deeply political people, so we’re going to stick with it no matter what. But normal people who say:

 

“Look, I’m finally getting involved!”

 

They don’t get involved to hear about infighting and that.

 

“Actually this guy over here who’s standing for this party, that’s kind of like us, he’s the real bad guy!”

 

They hate this! And this always happened in the BNP. Whenever there was any infighting, the people who emerged as the winners, always emerged to rule over a depleted and damaged organisation. That’s just how it is.

 

And whilst this war is kicking off, whilst Restore are going toe to toe with Reform, actually the opposite’s happening on the Left. The Left are sticking together. Labour are going into partnership with the Greens to lock out a populist Right-wing government.

 

And what we’re seeing here is at a crucial time in our history, the Right-wing, which is often prone to these splits, is having one of these splits. And the ugliest part of this is Restore could actually end up stopping Reform from winning a general election. They could fight each other to a standstill or Reform could stop Restore. They’ll end up fighting each other to a standstill.

 

Now, let’s have a look at this. Let’s have a look at reality. In 99, 2000, we made up, White Britons, made up 90% of the population in Britain. By 2024, 2025, we made up 70% of the population in Britain. Over 25 years, a quarter of a century, our share of the population declined by 20%, 0.8% per year.

 

Now, I believed that the last real chance to turn things around was the BNP in the 2000s.

 

But we’ve been thrown this last, last chance now. And that’s what was being built at the last, last, last, last, last chance we’ll ever have! But I’ll tell you this infighting could blow it and it could grant Labour five more years of power.

 

Now, look, if we went from 90% to 70% in 25 years, well, 25 years from now, we’ll be a minority. And five more years of Labour would take us to 2034. We’d only have 16 years left.

 

And at that point we’d have more immigrants voting against us, more people married to immigrants, more integration, more people who are depressed. It would be harder to do it further down the line. The closer you get to a minority, the harder it is to do it. The more multiracial, the more multicultural you become, the harder it is to do things.

 

I was looking at the next general election and I had three objectives at that next general election. And I honestly, I wanted Reform to win the next general election general election. And I wanted them to win for three reasons. Not because I love Nigel Farage, not because I thought that they would bring about a government I would actually want to see, but for three reasons.

 

Firstly, I wanted them to smash the old parties. I wanted them to mortally wound Labour in White working class areas. And I wanted them to destroy the Conservative Party for good. Because the Conservative Party has been the party which has held nationalists back post Second World War. Every time Nationalist parties have got big, the Conservatives come in, talk about little bit about immigration, everyone goes and votes for them and we have lost. That is always how it has worked! I wanted them smashing!

 

The second thing, I thought Farage might have slightly slowed out a climb down. I need to buy us time. We need to buy us time. Somebody needs to buy us time. We’re on the Titanic. Water’s coming into the ship, right? We may not be able to save the vessel, but imagine if less water was coming in. That would be a good thing because it buys you time to get people to the lifeboats.

 

[1:21:20]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:00:35]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/21/2026 = 446)

Mark Collett
7 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

1
0
Konstrukt
1 hour ago(edited)
Do we :
1. become ethnically self-conscious like our ancestors all other groups now living here and start acting in our own best interests?.
Or
2. continue to pretend we have no rights or grouo interests, cede more and more Power to invading , exclusive foreign groups and wonder off without a peep into the long dark night.

Pria’s Thoughts
2 hours ago
Mark i feel you are being completely vindicated. i found you guys about 7 years ago and its been quite a ride. you have never wavered. you and Laura and Joe and many others have been put through hell when all you were doiing was telling the truth. its knackering. just swatting away the idiots on X is knackering but years of plugging away, sharing evidence, setting out arguments, changing minds is coming to fruition. the genie is out of the lamp and it isn’t going back. Rupert is the man we need. more than ever. He seems like a good man. the more we support him the more confidence he will get. i will never forget everything you and PA have done up until this point.

1
0

@GazChamberz
2 hours ago
Schlomo of Akaad

1
0
Hide replies
Konstrukt
1 hour ago
Saegon of Moszad

1
0
Alice1488
2 hours ago
I’ve come to have respect for Rupert Lowe. I think he’s genuine though time will tell. I don’t think he’ll split the vote, I think he’ll win at the election if we all put our faith in him and take a chance on him!

1
0
Collatz
3 hours ago
At some level it’s good Steve is out there, but Mark would make a far better and more balanced representative w/in Restore for genuine ethnonationalists. Ngl I’m massively trepidatious seeing Rupert’s history over the last two years, but if it’s to be I can only hope he and PA have the strongest voice possible in its growth.

2
0

@RonP1
3 hours ago(edited)
A few obvious questions for Restore.
What is your opinion regarding that little State in the Middle East
What is your policy regarding Jewish influence on British affairs
What is your policy regarding Secret Societies
What is your plan regarding Britain’s foreign-controlled monetary system
As Arnold Leese correctly said, Democracy is Death by Jewry.
The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.

3
0
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
“Democracy is Death by Jewry.”
As if we had democracy. The truth: Actual democracy would be the death of Jewish power.
“The current rulers of Britain never came to power through the voting system.”
Exactly. We have plutocracy, not democracy.

1
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
2 hours ago(edited)
That’s what the quote is saying,
Democracy is Death by Jewry, Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry & it will lead to your death.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago(edited)
“Democracy (the version we have) is the tool of Jewry.”
The version of “democracy” we have is NOT democracy. Or anything even close. Jewish culture and mentality is elitist, totalitarian, intolerantly exclusive, predatory and fiercely supremacist, thus profoundly anti-democratic. What we have had is, as I said, plutocracy, not democracy. We have fraudulent stage-managed pseudo-democracy with real power exercised from behind the scenes by capitalist elites – with Jews as the dominant element among the elites.

0KT0BER
4 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago
goodnight all

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
G’night all good white people.

1
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Where is debate with David Clews and Alek Yerbury to be found?

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
14
nighty night!

Sir Trancealot
5 hours ago
14

jm
5 hours ago
it was a good stream, very well

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/2024620452639830224

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Nights folks

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Hail Victory o/

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Thanks Mark

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
I enjoyed last hour

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
Great show thanks Mark

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
lol okay

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
no i’d miss things

JamesL
5 hours ago
musk has banned me several days ago

@noreplacement
5 hours ago
What if we put all backs on the moon. Total dark side of the mmoon

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
just refresh

withey
5 hours ago
i had to pause the stream i’m on a time lag

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
We need to put a black man on the moon so he can scatter chicken bones on the surface.

1
0

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
“another man on the moon”? lol

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
The one that gives superhuman strength.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@withey
“blue milk”

withey
5 hours ago
it looks like the sci-fi drinks in films

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that would be better – lol

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
I’d like to see them lose something else.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Looking forward to the day the Tory party is destroyed and hundreds of Tory traitors lose their seats

2
0

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@USSA
Shameful.

God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
we bomb the shit out of their country and then give them free healthcare zz you can’t put your hate on them

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
haha

@MilosM.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Never saw that one in a while.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago

@SOA
No Remorse.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
copy that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck%27s_Brewery

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Dafuq is that blue fluid? You’ll getting poisoned, Mark.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s another bait monger just ignore

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
makes me*

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@VesselofGrace
Sorry buddy, I don’t believe your Jew God. If you believe that makes me dull and your enemy you have bigger problems to deal with than me.

1
0
God is the best deputy, Save Palestine
5 hours ago
I do think white people have used their supremacy for more evil than good and we need to balance it out. God loves all people

0
3

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Becky? Beckie?

0
1

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I don’t know that, but I think that’s pretty known by now, I mean for someone interested in the Bible and Christianity in general.

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
that wasn’t promised it was inferred, and we didn’t get real brexit, it was brino

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
a beer!

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Collett is one of the few who wouldn’t ever sell out. Easy to trust someone like that

3
0
Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Failure to use TheHolyChristianBible against SatanicJeews would be Idiotic and Subversive.

1
1
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I can’t believe Farage is still politically relevant after lying about Brexit telling people that the $250 million will go to the NHS.

1
0
Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
People need to stop caring about the “magic book” theory. It doesn’t change people, in fact it actively hurts whites’ racial preference. Stop caring about the Bible and start caring about your family (your people).

1
0
withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
of course it doesn’t matter, but it would be intereing to know to get an idea of what was at play and why

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
The whole Barbour jacket, black ‘lab’ & Ye Olde chocolate box village aesthetic are exactly the same as Farage was doing 10 years ago. Lowe is just as phoney and his politics stink. Thatcherite guff mixed with Muslims! Muslims! Muslims! Rhetoric. Count me out as a member of the Tribe once said…

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Eh, historians and theologists, I guess.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
but who wrote those sources?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
eh… no. All sources point he translated the bible from hebrew to the greek. The first who did so. I think he is most known by that.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
get Russell on the show Mark, he needs a promo lift these days lol

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
o/

withey
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
definitely

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I prefer 1933 politics

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark, I asked you a question in Telegram DM.

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
wasn’t greek the lingua franca of the time so surely the jews wrote it in hebrew and greek?

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago
Lots of people who should know better are jumping in with both feet. The level of naivete is hard to fathom…

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
a jew who passes as a jew is a jew, it all boils down to aesthetics and mindset

@FredDibnah1938
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Reform will be worse because the Zionists funding them will tell them to persecute real nationalists…

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
M C

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Apostle Paul. Who translated Bible to Greek the first,

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 hours ago
The first Greek translation of the Bible was the Septuagint of the 3rd-2nd centuries BC. The Pentateuch was translated in the 3rd century BC and most of the rest of the Hebrew Bible in the 2nd century BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Peled has described his book, The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine (2012),[2] as an account of how he, “the son of an Israeli General and a staunch Zionist, came to realize that “the story upon which I was raised … was a lie.”[3]

Kevin
5 hours ago

@withey
You’re retarded. Are Koreans like 60% Italian, 15% German?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
paul?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it boils down to do they pass, which means both aesthetics and mindset

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Wrong war(s) Fatigue.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
Same like Paul.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
he’s still trapped in that ‘Germans bad’ box

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
According to Peled: “Israel has been on a mission to destroy the Palestinian people for over six decades. Why would anyone not give solidarity to the Palestinian people?”[16 Peled has written that the “IDF lusts for blood, accused Israeli officials of “ethnic cleansing.”[18]

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
White People War Fatigue.

withey
5 hours ago

@Philip.Kollberg
don’t give brother nathaniel any attention he’s a jew who’s larping as a christian nothing more

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miko_Peled#Views

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
and the most pro-Nature

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
But, unironically, I would award Michael Douglas and Harrison Ford with the ‘white’ title.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Contrary to popular Lies. Nationalist White people are the most Anti•War, Peace Path people on the planet.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
i dont know this person, sadly?

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white. according to jews
https://forward.com/community/405016/no-ashkenazi-jews-are-not-functionally-white/

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Miko Peled sounds based, for someone who grew in zionist family.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
koreans are not white, light shade of coloured skin is just that

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Some Jews actually see themselves as white. Caucasian white. Most find it just a secondary or even tertiary thing.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
they aren’t. They descended from about 350 people in the Middle East.

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Brother Nathaniel

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
jews are not white

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Bring some Jew to the show (that is anti-Ron Unz).

Kevin
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
So what? They are white. Ironically saying that pissed more Jews off than anyone else because most of them deny their majority European ancestry

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
Elon is proving to be very useful for white cause. Even though, he is not one of us.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
W

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
if you’re in the US, join Patriot Front

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Sweden democrats apeasing Israel.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And slaves, and native Americans and whites of different stocks. All fighting against other whites in the name of…being free of the taxes.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Empathy for the Devil aka SatanicJeews.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Elon also said that Jews are peak white…

Kevin
5 hours ago
Elon also is giving Lowe support. He posted a picture of his parents and grandparents in Britain and said “We can’t let our homeland fall”

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
stupid argument. White is still white. If you’re talking about the slaves, I agree that it was the worst mistake the US ever made.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Alek Yerbury compared Rupert Lowe’s policies to Margaret Thatcher’s.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
They should have joined PA

jm
5 hours ago
so, would it be better if >Rupert Lowe went the way of activism but not parlementarisme ?

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
America is diluted anyways. Since its inception.

Kevin
5 hours ago
It is within First Past the Post systems and in the British system specifically

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I don’t think a Reform gov with Farage as MP will be as damaging as a Labour gov.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I am afraid that some unpopular leaders may be necessary, but Reagan was very based on JQ. But I guess it proves that you don’t have to be pro-semitic to be based and vice-versa.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Any president who dilutes the essence of what an American used to be (a white person of moral character) is shite. So pretty much every president

@Philip.Kollberg
5 hours ago
Legal migration to USA is hard af fuk

withey
5 hours ago
i back the strongest message

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
“Anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American.” — President Ronald Reagan (January 19, 1989)

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
Reagan*

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
Illegals, criminals and immigrants who want to go home if paid are easy wins. We can all agree with that.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)
Reagan was a plant who allowed 3 million illegal migrants to stay in the US. To hell with him

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
And he turned against them.

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
i agree rupert feels better than farage as primeminister

Kevin
5 hours ago
Farage is surrounded by very questionable people: conservatives who brought the migrations, muslims, etc.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
Reagan was handpicked by them

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
At least Reagan was anti-Jewish during his tenure.

Kevin
5 hours ago
I actually think people don’t like Farage as much as you think. They are just the only other option. Farrage comes across as a clown, not a prime minister. Lowe looks like a prime minister – that is imporant

withey
5 hours ago

@Hillbrow
we must sink him, hopefully racism will see him flee

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
It is imperative that the BBC are dismantled and exported to West Africa.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
like Reagan did the American people, thatcher did massive damage to the British people

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
I think both can be useful as long as they don’t work against each other.

withey
5 hours ago
rupert will work hard, we must sink farage,

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@withey
We use to call it ‘fake opposition’.

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
where does anyone named habib fit in?

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@BritishGammon
it seems to be an absolute truth that people will carry hope until they are starving

withey
5 hours ago
very true the fake ukip stole ukip votes because people didn’t check the wording

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
problem is 19 from that are working for the jewish controlled government.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It produced however the greater unity and awareness of some crucial ideas which probably wouldn’t happen if he wasn’t elected. Whatever you think, having a central political figure is the only way to go.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
I thought being locked down and forced to be jabbed would wake up most people-sadly not

Kevin
5 hours ago
Then having a big nationalist party will just transition to a resistance movement with high profile leaders

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
80/20 rule. 80% are cattle, 20% know what’s going on. half of those people are in power and the other half is us lol

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
No. We’re separating. Geogralicalky and socially

@Hillbrow
5 hours ago
At least you will always have your mandela statue in trafalgar square

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
*that

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
I’m quite frankly astonished the most people are still normies. They listened to lies on TV and when they go out and see the opposite they still believe the TV.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
We are pulling apart

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
there’s quite a bit here in the States.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
I blame the cocksucking males.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Actualky there’s very little inter breeding

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people united around Trump. They believed in him. That has turned out great hasn’t it?

withey
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
idiots cause trouble and leave

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
It won’t help also to spread blackpills and demoralization. People need a figure they could unite around.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I noticed that myself with some white nationalist groups. People infight then always someone leaves it.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
people only need hope in themselves. That’s easy if you know yourself and your strengths and utilize them. Those who need to cope with lies won’t accomplish anything meaninful

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
People need hope. If people became self-deprecated and hopeless about the political solution, that only leads to more misery and hell.

Kevin
5 hours ago
This example is bunk. The real comparison is if the White Army tried to unite with the Mensheviks

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
If they look english i trust them lol. even if theyre wrong on some things

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
my new working theory

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
Are you talking Mark about Wyvern the Terrible?

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The brst way to know who to truat : Physiognomy.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago
If Lowe succeeds, hope is kindled. If he doesn’t, more people will become disaffected and believe there is no political solution. I think it’s a win-win

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
I hope so

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago
59 B.C. Cicero criticized the Jews of Rome for their perceived political power and presence in public assemblies. He famously noted their solidarity, suggesting they “stick together” and could exert significant influence over court proceedings through their numbers and organized presence.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Cultural Standardisation causes alienation

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Also, Edward II expelled Jews in the 12th century from UK.

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@AlexandreL
this is a classic argument by supporters of the Constitution and the Bible. It really doesn’t matter what these documents used to mean, it matters what role they play in society now.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I don’t see blacks voting in the constitution it was something that is a modern perception after lincoln and the civil rights era.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
And you xan guess who

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Marxism and Globalism two side of the same Hamner. It’s ethnicalky driven.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
it goes back a long time to the Time of Rome even. In 1492 Spain expelled the jews and in 1493 the Spanish golden age started.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing “The Enemy of Europe” by Francis Yakey later tonigbt in their livestream

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
Danny Tomo hates Mark.

withey
5 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
certainly

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
I predict that Farage will end up being disgraced for all of his cucking.

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Well you can say that about a lot if you go like this is what we used to be but now we’re in the 21st century this is what it means now yo.

Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
yes so the mischief of jews spans back to 2000 years.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
dirty tricks already underway:
https://xcancel.com/InevitableWes

@MilosM.
5 hours ago
I hope that Lowe won’t be outed from politics for antisemitism like Jeremy Corbyn was.

@BritishGammon
5 hours ago
I think a lot of ordinary folk will get confused between Reform and Restore and which is Farage and which is Lowe

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
The same looking High Street in all 4 corners of the globe

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago(edited)

@AlexandreL
in order for the Constitution to still have the glory it once did, the nation needs to have the people who respected what it represented while contributing to society. In other words, White primacy.

SublimeBraid
5 hours ago
The movement needs trailblazers for those who come after have a path to follow.

Prison Ships
5 hours ago
Most perverts like voting for Queers.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
Napoleon also had some anti-Jew legislatures but I forgot which.

0KT0BER
5 hours ago

@withey
yes. also danny has a lot of confidence in his sprinting attributes

@AlexandreL
5 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
The constitution didn’t start being known the way it is until the 1960s or at least Lincoln when he said blacks should have the right to vote and all the rights white people do.

@MilosM.
5 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, now we are going too deep in history. I wouldn’t say that Jews actually were a ‘thing’ more than 100 years. Somehow Jews got the most of these wars that European fought among themselves in the past 200 years. But gradually, not immediately.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
Warstrike is discussing thus book later tonigbt in their livestream

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
read; The Enemy of Ejrope by Francis Yokey

withey
5 hours ago

@KevinClan
very true i’m not a member but i support it

withey
5 hours ago

@0KT0BER
good because it furthers the divide

Kevin
5 hours ago
Members don’t = votes. Our message is popular and we know it

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
i agred

Separation or Amalgamation
5 hours ago

@konstrukt
Christianity has a role in breaking down whites’ loss of racial preference. Sorry Christians, but your universal ideology has corrupted our people.

2
1
Hide replies

@Glen19
2 hours ago
Universal religions like Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity has pushed Paganism to extinction around most of the planet. Identity isn’t solely based on religion otherwise it wouldn’t exist. Blaming Christianity for the Woes of is just deflection.

1
0
Prison Ships
2 minutes ago
TheHolyChristianBible rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more so than anything else, does and there is Nothing anyone can do about it. It Stands Written.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
5 hours ago

@MilosM.
not all wars were started by jews indeed. But most wars were financed by jews going back to Napoleon since the Rothschild family captured most of Europe’s banks.

Konstrukt
5 hours ago
the middle class would rather lord it over ethnics. i suspect theyll revret it

0KT0BER
5 hours ago
danny tommo is promising to give anyone a hiding that abuses his monkey mates on twitter lol

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
I think relation to the Jewishness is pretty fluid. Especially if your ancestor was native European, but who converted to judaism in meantime.

withey
6 hours ago
sargon will go full force, tommy is a civ nat

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
all other groups have ethnic self consciousness.

jm
6 hours ago
reimigration, and than, all those mixed race families, more and more every year, time is running out

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not sure that swastika ban is common anywhere. In countries like Germany yes, or like mine, but not every country is like that. Some have bigger freedom of speech. Austria had 20 years openly nazi chancellor.

withey
6 hours ago

@konstrukt
agreed and it ties in with the social contagion

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Suicidal BabyKilling women.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh… Need I not remind that we fought over it 80 years ago? We, as Europeans, not Jews. Those sentiments still prevailed ’til this day. Especially when you had people allying with the Nazis to kill their neighbors.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
And cultural standard-isation is the cause

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
The Constitution needs to go.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Suicidal (((Marxism)))

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@KevinClan
well yes, that was intentional by the Founding Fathers to prevent a tyranny. However, our country is now invaded every year and our federal government doesn’t have the power to properly address the issue.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
cultural alienation is the disease

Kevin
6 hours ago
truth is, British government has way more power than the US federal government. They can cut all benefits, while the US government cant

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Yes it proves he was two generations ago related to a jew not that he was one.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
He didn’t know he had Jewish ancestry I just said that.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, Lenin was 1/6 or 1/8 Jewish.

jm
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
well, yes boomers have a lot to go for them, we grew up in very much harder society

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago(edited)

@noreplacement

@jm
as much disdain as I have for the many silent gens and boomers who allowed all of this mania to take place, I agree that whites have to work together. However, there is no better way for people to disassociate from their programming than some form of trauma like a Black Swan event.

withey
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
agreed

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
A certain amount of Cuck makes a Traitor.

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
agreed

Kevin
6 hours ago
Rupert already has addressed this with his “fast track spouse” visa promise. He is reaching out to the Thai bride people, but saying it will be banned from Pakistan, Afghanistan and other problem countries.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It also speaks against white people how so many of them side with jews and the left in Britain and France today. The jews wouldnt be able to do this without whites stupidity. Means white people are just as bad.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
The older generation is more important than ever because only they know what was normal 20 years ago.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
No, it’s Nazbol. Not exactly the nazi type of fascism.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
here’s the key difference, the demographic reality when the bnp was popular was not as dire as it is now. so, cucking like Farage does when your people are on the brink of becoming a despised minority is no longer a winning strategy.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the intelligence of the joke is what defines it

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
you will get jailed in every single European country if you publicly display a swastika. National Socialism is not a threat to Europeans it’s only a threat to world jewry and the jewish banking mafia.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
I’m a boomer too and see a lot of younger folk, sadly waiting for boomers to die off is not going to fix things. All generations have to work together

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@withey
you can be funny without telling dark or political jokes. It only degrades your rhetoric and makes you look crass and unprofessional

withey
6 hours ago
make it trend to make it acceptable

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
And to add, so far I haven’t seen much of Jew protection from the Soviets. Even in post-Stalin times. Now, all Jews who don’t want to end murdered or imprisoned and who are rich, have to cuck to Putin.

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
probably to make sure everyone was serious, we however need humour to soften the blow

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
It’s said Lenin never actually knew he had 1 8th jewish ancestry.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
To be frank, the only reason why today Nazi symbols and values are strongly condemned in Russia is because they won in ww2, with individually probably the biggest death rate. So, I believe that antisemitism thing is just thrown in the basket along with anti-Nazism.

jm
6 hours ago

@withey
I am a boomer, and I can tell you, they exaspared me, they have to go before younger people can get a grip on that holocaust question and throw it off and be for our own people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Yes that is true but it means lenins grandfather was half jewish I heard he was 8th jewish. Not Lenin and I heard Lenin hadn’t even known about it.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Hitler didn’t like dark or political jokes. I think that’s an important lesson to learn as a public figure

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
They own tbe media. Thetefore they control the public’s minds

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
The revelation was intended to combat rising anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, though the information was suppressed.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago
Communist language has become the spirit of the times, which is why everyone who thinks differently is now considered a Nazi.

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Yeh. Electoral politics aint the way

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
it’s not difficult we just need to make it trend to make it acceptable

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, but they have to revisted their history -they have to throw off the holocaust lies, behore they can proceed

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Sorry my mistake. It’s not a rumor. Documents released by a Moscow museum in 2011 confirmed that Vladimir Lenin had Jewish ancestry, supporting a long-standing, formerly suppressed rumor
. Lenin’s maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to escape persecut

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
eh, not really. He indeed had apparently Jewish ancestry, but I wouldn’t say it was half. Great-grandfather was, from I forgot which side. Which funny enough, he didn’t even know about during his lifetime.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
facism was and has been the answer to communism for a long time. That is the Third Position and is inevitable.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The NAZI question isn’t even really about Jews, its that the general public still views
it as extreme and evil and don’t want to be associated with it. It isn’t a hill to die on, and you can definately expect Lowe to say he is not a nazi and doesn’t support nazis

withey
6 hours ago
that was then this is now, people are sick of immigrants

jm
6 hours ago
the nazi question is very much difficult… it clips our wings, and I am you can say a nazi what my opinions are -the third way

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
MSM and MPs call everyone “Nazis”. Even Boris and the Tories were called “Nazis”.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Its like America today is heavily jewish influenced but it still is on the white americans to fight for this and be complicit in it for so long.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Germany is entirely occupied, there is no need to rehash WW2 right now. There’s no political way to win regarding Hitler

withey
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
hopefully lowe sees what farage did and do the opposite

Konstrukt
6 hours ago
Local Councils in England have got all those foreign born illwgal Uber drivers on Lease contracts with nothing to pay up front

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Libertanism existed long before communism is created. It dates back to Reformation period, or even before maybe. Third Position to me sounds like a Nazbol, to be honest.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
who said Nazi? Gott mit uns

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
jews fight for power as well like everyone else. In the end the biggest achievement of the Soviet Union was defeating the most antisemitic government in the 20th century. And thus it seemed the only purpose of the Soviets was to protect jews in Europe.

Kevin
6 hours ago
The whole nazi thing has to be avoided – denounce it in public. We need to save the damn country, not fight WW2

withey
6 hours ago

@jm
everyone is affected by immigration most aren’t affected by rape gangs

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
so the moral of the lesson is to cuck?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the fun stuff

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
the only word for lowe to have is ‘remigration’

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
yes it should be something about immigration… now on the interview with Maitlis it was around the grooming gangs -there is another point that can reassamble a lot of people

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
That was bullshit and has been refuted.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I would say that indeed yes, Stalin purged many Jews from power, but it didn’t start with him. Don’t forget about mensheviks and their conflict with bolsheviks and bolsheviks killed them all. And both were all Jews.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Tony Lacomba?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
don’t know how people feel about it

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I think the “send them back” is pretty good but I don’

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Lenin is rumored to be half jewish himself. It is ironic that a jewish woman tried to assassinate him.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Mostly blacks drank Jim’s Kool Aid.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because they would be persecuted if they don’t so.

jm
6 hours ago
May be Lowe should point to one programme point, one slogan where people can get behind

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
is libertarianism*

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Initially, bolshevik party was overwhelmingly Jewish. Lenin got USSR out of ww1. Then, I guess non-Jews got used to it. Lenin was dictator and so was Stalin but the irony is that this figures have the most positive impression on the Russian people.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
so the answer to communism and libertarianism? Jews created both sides of the spectrum and people feel they need to pick a side when there’s a “Third Position” o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
In the beginning jews loved the communist government because it served them. When Stalin started to purge all the jews from power than they hated it and hate it till this day.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
And the army also had to have millions of Russians willing to fight for communism and they did to do the revolution in the first place.

@Goblinz_and_Ghouls
6 hours ago
Ayn Rand loved amphetamine and cigarettes more than life itself. She once said the glow of a cigarette is like the fire in a mans heart.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@BritishGammon
yep, play the (vague) game

@SaulGoodman
6 hours ago
Rupert Lowe is part of the problem. he is a tory banker that wants legal migrants to replace white Brits who are forced to pick litter for subsistence wages.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Farage is cucking to the Somalians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
I am not so sure about that. Take Ayn Rand for e.x. One of the reasons why we speak badly today about communism and bolsheviks are because of her and her early life experience. Plenty of Jews croaked in these pogroms. I wouldn’t say they benefit from it, if they were not part of govt

Kevin
6 hours ago
I wouldn’t sit with Laws or Zoomer either lol

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Lowe just has to say “the party is a broad church”. That’s what all other parties say

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Well I’m trying to say the assemblies in power were full of Russian politicians who weren’t jewish who allowed them to stay in powerful positions too!

withey
6 hours ago

@horatiohornblower
sargon passes as white, so of course he stays

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
this

jm
6 hours ago
Bravo Marc

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Today, Marxism dominates the entire West. That was the result.

WhiteLightWhiteHeat
6 hours ago
“Independently wealthy” is KEY!

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
They were powerless to do anything. But maybe they bought into its ideology. Just like French revolutionaires did in 1789.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
antisemitism was punishable by death in the early Soviet era. Maybe they killed som troublesome jews who refused to go along the program, but the majority of jews hugely benefited the bolshevik revolution.

@horatiohornblower
6 hours ago
Sargon is black, will he be deported?

withey
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
no, instead be overenthusiastic, inspire hope and good feeling

Kevin
6 hours ago
Brexit party founder has now come out for Lowe also

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
agreed

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
Rupert will have to be single minded and strong

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Churchill called the October revolution Jewish. He even led an attempt to overthrow the bolshevik government, but… Who knows where would we be today if he succeeded.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
The Tsar and family were murdered during the shortest nights of the year.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
Every party has factions-they know they have to work together

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Still at the end of the day, Russia chose communism. The jews couldnt have run it without russians allowing them to.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
I respect your persistence but I would suggest not engaging that troll. He’s actively trying to sow discord in this stream

withey
6 hours ago
idling makes for social problems, work makes for cooperation

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
Idk, it is possible they didn’t. There weren’t as much as Jews as white Christians anyway. I think a lot more Jews actually emigrated to the West, after bolsheviks seized power, but also so during the tsarist times. Which makes me think, what values exactly bolsheviks brought for Jew

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
measured enthusiasm

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
Sargons like pacman gobblin up coins in the wake of people with balls

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Read Churchill’s newspaper article from February 8, 1920, in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, in which he described the decisive role of the Jews

withey
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
not at all

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Many of the other soviet assembly members were Russians who weren’t jewish. Also Stalin the infamous one responsible for all the stuff he was wasn’t Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
time to normalise toxicity

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Sargon is a fraud

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
On the night of 16/17 July 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police (Cheka) led by Yurovsky executed Russia’s last emperor, Nicholas II, along with his family. – The Yurovsky family was Jewish.

withey
6 hours ago
have hope, get motivation, push them, force the hand

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
We still need activism and collectivism to achieve true power

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Agreed Mark! We can’t overdose on the white pills. Plenty of work to do

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@Kreuzfahrer
Well it’s still simplified as jewish when it was a european country russia choosing on a national scale communism and they still choose it it’s still pretty popular today in Russia.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
infatuation stage

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@withey
howdy!

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@MilosM.

@utopia148800

@BritishGammon

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
If Lowe is successful the overton window is much easier to shift in other countries, and hopefully the US. I think it’s reasonable to plan in case it doesn’t work out. 1488

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
we dont have any other avenue than Lowe even if theres a slowmotion boot to the face coming

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
but they didn’t kill 20 million jews because they did kill 20 million white Christians.

@MilosM.
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening and evening to

@withey

withey
6 hours ago
hail

@0KT0BER

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i love farmers

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
o/

@withey

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MilosM.
Evening

withey
6 hours ago
good evening all 14/88 wpwp 28

@MilosM.
6 hours ago
Bolshevik Jews killed other Jews.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
^

jm
6 hours ago
Make the stream about what Marc is talking about… not about jews in the politburo

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe is a pretty big white pill I will admit

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
the lifting of self-censorship is the beginning of enlightenment for the masses

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
he’s a kayak clearly

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
true, I think he has not read anything

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
he’s been doing this for sometime, have a look on his odysee page

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I can’t tell if

@AlexandreL
is a troll or legitimately believes these things. A waste trying to convince someone like this however

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Including stalin and lenin and every leader they had.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
There were plenty of soviet officials who weren’t jewish.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Also which one of the soviet leaders you can name was a jew? None of them. As well as many of the soviet parliaments or assemblies or whatever you call them.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
what on earth are you talking about? the 60,000,000 people slain by the Communist regime were Christian Europeans, White Russians, Muslims, etc. sure, some of the whites joined with the Communists but obviously some members of a group will always be traitors/scum and sell out.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Trotsky wasn’t even having a good time in the bolsheviks I heard he got in prison for something.

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Because the Europeans were superior. What do you think the backward Muslims or Africans would have done if they had possessed technological superiority?

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
If I remember correctly, three of the seven members of the first Politburo were Jewish, 43%, in a population share of 5%. The Cheka was predominantly Jewish.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
who were the kulaks

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
probably true. But we need some positives and what else do we have right now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The soviets killed a lot of people but nowhere near 60 million. It may have been Jewish influenced but they were far from the only ones in powerful positions who wanted it.

SublimeBraid
6 hours ago
Are we all forgetting that we’re not voting our way out of this? Golden Dawn was the third most popular party in the Greek parliament and held as many as 21 seats. Due to jewish supremacist lobbying the party was declared a criminal organization and its leaders were sentenced to 13.5 years in prison.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
What’s a kayak? Oh… I see it now.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Putin said ~86% of leaders NKVD secret police were SatanicJeews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The rumors of stalin being a jew were false! Also the soviet union didnt kill 60 million people that is a hugely exagerated numbre and also the ones killing them were Russians just like the victims were.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago
he is

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
well said

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
ANd had millions of slavic europeans willing to fight for their cause and also only a percentage of the actual soviet powerful were jews.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
And hundreds of millions of european russians and eastern europeans from other regions.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the Bolsheviks were Jews not Europeans. the rise in Communism by Stalin and Trotsky (real last name. Bronstein) is entirely relevant to the JQ and mass immigration today

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
When it’s Russia there’s no issue saying how horrible Europeans are.

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Only Idiots think the World War’s results aren’t the reason Satan is Amplified.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
But why it has nothing to do with us there’s not reason we should feel guilty if it happened. The Soviet Union was Russians and people are fully willing to talk about Europeans committing the worst genocides in history supposedly.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
he seems like a genuine bloke

@noreplacement
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Yes, politics is a game and we do not make the rules-yet.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Godspeed Sir!

the woodlander
6 hours ago
jumping to rumble

jm
6 hours ago
Lowe has the ring of honesty about him

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
the people who still believe the 6m narrative are cattle. They will eventually either mix into obscurity or become a powerless majority

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Until September 1, 1939, Hitler had murdered a few hundred people, while Stalin had already killed millions. And of course, Stalin didn’t receive a declaration of war although he seized the greater part of Poland.

@EuropaAeterna
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
Depends on what they accuse you of

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
i don’t put much stock in mens words anymore

Better Based Than Erased
6 hours ago
Scaredy cats aren’t they – not speaking about kosher

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
And Germany 80 years ago has nothing to do with us.

@BritishGammon
6 hours ago
I hope they will ban imports as well

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Thow the NeoBolshevik Oppressors out of the ‘overtonwindow’.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
Openly supporting the mustache man gives the media ammo as well. So you have to make due with something.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@GrugsGhost
so it’s 1950 again? eventually that still led to where we are now

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@noreplacement
So the solution is to become supporters of the thing they accuse you of? Also me okay because I am one of you as hard as it is to believe.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
seems he’s ok with nons as long as they are productive and not a public drain

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
Lowe needs to give the right answer to the Holohoax…

jm
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
that is just to suppose the worst…

@who
6 hours ago

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
who is a charlie chaplin impersonator?

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
I just fear the Lowe’s reponse to the JQ and nons that are born within the UK – equivalent to “birthright citizenship” here in the States.

@noreplacement
6 hours ago
If we do not expose the 6m myth we will always held back. As soon as we get going, they bring up the holo

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@MarkCollett
What I would like to ask is what are your plans if Lowe gets in to power but totally betrays the cause like all the other nationalist parties that were elected to lead?

jm
6 hours ago
it is true, in 2014 I still supported Israel ! can you imagine ? Now I follow Marc, RedIce, Blackpilled, Warstrike and many more.

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
Which is kind of the definition of a Nazi supporter isn’t it?

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@VesselofGrace
People in this chat were just telling me they don’t want to be called nazis by the media but then tell me about how the Nazis were nice and six million cookies weren’t baked.

the woodlander
6 hours ago
all of those tweets come from his team, not rupert himself. i just hope he understands.

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@WarStrike

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
I’m not a non.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
A whole bunch but I usually don’t watch live. Nick Fuentes, Jake Shields Redice Blood Tribe and a bunch of smaller shows.

jm
6 hours ago
I saw the interview with Maitlis -he was good

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
yep proceed with caution is best

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@jm
I’ve heard of that, I’ll check it out. thanks

Prison Ships
6 hours ago
Common Sense Revival Ahead..

@AlexandreL
6 hours ago
The Soviet Union was a European state too buddy. I’m not a J I shouldn’t get this much people telling me to bore off for not supporting a charlie chaplin impersonator.

AnalyticalMale
6 hours ago
extraordinary

Kevin
6 hours ago
80k now Mark

Chief Moody
6 hours ago
I thought it was 80K

Kevin
6 hours ago
it’s 80 thousand now

@Kreuzfahrer
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
What role do the dead Jews play in the context of 60 million deaths and the downfall of Europe, simply because the British and French declared war over German territories? Tell me.

JamesL
6 hours ago
bore off

@AlexandreL

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
you can’t be mad at Cookie Monster for being skeptical :flatbread:

0KT0BER
6 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897 that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL

jm
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Warstrike is interesting

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
We can never trust politicians. I trust Mark.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
which streams do you mean? I don’t watch many people aside from Collett and Devon Stack.

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
You’re lucky streams in America start at 2am for us here

Kevin
6 hours ago
your buddy Mike from TRS was just shitting all over Lowe saying nobody should do anything because it is all over. like to hell with that guy

Prison Ships
6 hours ago

@AlexandreL
You can’t do anything about it, so stop moaning..Your opinion is over amplified for 88 years.

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
71 watching, 18 likes. Hit that fire button!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago
though it’s afternoon for me lol

0KT0BER
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
o/

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago

@SeparationOrAmalgamation
Hello Sir!

Separation or Amalgamation
6 hours ago

@utopia148800
evening

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
*gentlemen

Secure the future of our people
6 hours ago
Evening Gentleman.

Secure the future of our people
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Just finished watching your Jake Shields interview. It was pretty awesome! :ok_hand:

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
spot on.

the woodlander
7 hours ago

@0KT0BER
buddy

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
evening Woody

Prison Ships
7 hours ago
Favouring SatanicJeews over Christian Germany was offensively Foul.

Separation or Amalgamation
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
if you are white, you have some serious learning to do. But I suspect you’re a non

the woodlander
7 hours ago
gentlemen

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Mark why do you not think any mention of the Nazis tarnishes your entire movement in the eyes of normies?

JamesL
7 hours ago

Mark Collett
7 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
you are making all my points!

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
sadly this is not helped by some in the movement- I will argue against the BOOMER MYTH of Churchill saving Britain BUT trying to recreate nazi germany is as daft as trying to bring back the witchfinder general-

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
PART of what has held nationalism back IS this association by media of ANY Nationalist movement with muh evil nazis-WHY do you think it was the 1st question asked to Nick on QT. WHY do you think the media kept putting out those cartoonish photos of John Tyndall playing nazi dress up?

@AlexandreL
8 hours ago

@GusinLanzarote
Who says that everyone here believes stuff about 1939? You’re kind of speaking for everyone it has no relevance to the modern day and issues in our lives.

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
8 hours ago
Its the best out there- yes he’s a civ nat Boomer, Yes he probably wouldn’t agree with us that Britain should have stayed neutral in 1939-BUT he is putting forward BNP type policies & ALREADY has 50.000 members whereas the BNP Peak was 14000 & the NF peak was 16000.This surely is a white pill…

@AlexandreL
12 hours ago

@MarkCollett
:kissing_closed_eyes:

Mark Collett
15 hours ago

@AlexandreL
The Room!

@AlexandreL
17 hours ago
Hello Mark, I did not hit her, oh hi Mark.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
“National fanatacism, indeed, was not yet extinguished; but it burnt itself completely out in the vigorous insurrection led by Bar-Cocheba, the pseudo-messiah, in which nearly six million jews lost their lives” – OpenCourt -1897

@AlexandreL
that’s your team bullshitting for 3000 years

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
I’m just saying you can’t say its not true when Mark lets people donate him 14 dollars and 88 cents every stream. He’s asking to be associated with certain people.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
1939, Mustache man declares war on Poland.

0KT0BER
7 hours ago

@AlexandreL
fcck off you little worm

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
https://odysee.com/@0KT0BER:9/opencourt-doc-1897:f

0KT0BER
7 hours ago
Friday, March 24, 1933 – Judea Declares War On Germany

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
When most channels would ban them instantly I’m not saying you should I’m just saying what it looks like.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
channel.

@AlexandreL
7 hours ago
You shouldn’t be saying anything like Churchill was the real villain or Auschwitz wasnt killing people or any stupid shit like that that guy is associating himself with the nazis by humanizing them in any way. I suspect you are more or less a nazi supporter thats why you let these people on your

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show. It is the 11th of July, 2025, and there’s a lot to discuss. It’s been somewhat interesting week in developments. There’s some issues to break down, some happenings to dissect, and we’ve got Blair back. So how you feeling this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I was just sending you something, actually, something that might be worth talking about later, but I’ve been a little bit sick. I was a bit sick last week and I have some, I don’t know, residual infection of some kind. It’s not that bad, but it feels like it’s inside my face somewhere. And I’ve got like swollen lymph nodes. Does anyone else get that? It’s like a node underneath your ear here somewhere and I can feel it pushing against a nerve in my tooth, so that’s not so pleasant, but I’m otherwise fine.

 

Well, that’s not true, actually. I sustained a slight injury in the gym on Monday, training for the weightlifting competition that’s coming up. I slightly tore my pec again, but only very slight. I got a scan at a radiology clinic yesterday and even though the woman who did the scan isn’t qualified to make any assessments, it was her opinion that my tendon was completely attached still. And it does seem that way because there’s no visible difference, there’s no bruising, but it’s quite painful and I’m currently not really able to do a push up. [chuckling] So that’s not good news, being only a few weeks out from the actual date of the competition.

 

But look, I’ve made pretty miraculous recoveries before, so I’m stealing with a chance here. I’m not going to let anyone down completely. I can still deadlift very heavy and squat, pretty heavy. And I only need my numbers on the bench press to be reasonable in order to stay in the game.

 

But it was kind of annoying. I spoke to Joel on the phone about this earlier in the week. What I’m most annoyed about isn’t that the injury happened. It’s that about a week before I got injured, I was lifting more than I was when I got injured.

 

So I’m not really sure how to interpret that. And I feel like I warmed up properly, I rested properly, I might not have been hydrated enough. That might have been it. And I may have changed my grip slightly. It’s like little things like that when you’re lifting quite heavy that can lead to injuries, so there’s that.

 

So I’ve got a slight infection Inside my face somewhere and I’ve got a slightly torn peck again. I’ve seen better days, guys but I’m feeling fine. It hasn’t got me down.

 

What I was thinking about this morning and yesterday to some extent I was thinking about how much sweeter women were before the Internet. Do you remember that, Joel? Like girls.

 

Joel Davis: Huh?

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that?

 

Joel Davis: I’m not old enough to remember that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? What, you’re only what, 29, 30?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but even still, I remember everyone was on social media when I was in high school, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting! You see, I remember a time before social media. I remember when social media kind of started with MySpace. And it wasn’t so bad then because that was before a time where you could access social media through a screen in your pocket. With MySpace you had to actually sit at your computer. So it was like of secondary importance. Like real life human interaction was still of primer the primary way that you interacted with other people.

 

And I can recall how much sweeter girls used to be. Like you used to sit next to in high school, you’d sit next to a girl and talk to her and she was blown away. She was so happy that you were talking to her. You were possibly the only guy that spoke to her in a period of six months. And it’s like these days women don’t have a good grasp on their limited value. Social media has made women feel like they’re a lot more valuable than they are. Even average looking girls are getting a shitload of attention on platforms like Instagram.

 

And so when you talk to a girl now, this is just like not saying I’m out there trying to talk to girls, right? It’s not like a frustration I’ve got or something. It was just like a nostalgic feeling I had over the past couple of days. I remember how much different girls used to be before the Internet. Like pre-Internet, women were superior to modern day women because they didn’t have a big head. They didn’t all feel like they were Victoria’s Secret models with their own little, you know, fashion magazine page on Instagram.

 

And I also noticed. I’ll get your take on this too. I don’t know if you’d agree with this.

 

Joel Davis: I can’t give a take on what you just said. We have to blow past the take?

 

Blair Cottrell: But I noticed that women are like stressed and angry when you see them in public. They’ve got this look on their face like it’s an angry look on their face. Like they’re men or something. You know how guys walk around with a frown, like a male ego? Women have that now as well.

 

Now, that’s probably for a multitude of reasons. It’s probably because women are expected to make money and compete in industries previously relevant only to men.

 

But I also think it’s because there’s a lot of pressure on women to maintain the image they’ve created on social media because they look really pretty on their Instagram pages with their special pictures taken on the perfect angle to make their waist look small and their bust look big and that kind of thing.

 

But then they go out into the real world and people are seeing them for the way they really look, and that’s a little bit stressful for them. There’s a lot riding on the reputation that they’ve created in the virtual realm to continue to look as beautiful as that.

 

[05:54]

 

So I’ve just been thinking about this, and I’ve been forced to conclude that I think social media should be banned, especially for women. I think women just shouldn’t be allowed on social media because they turn it into a prostitution racket. And it’s just bad for their psychology generally. I don’t think it’s necessarily good for men either, because actually men just end up simping after women and feeding into the problem, don’t they?

 

What do you think, Joel? Joel, do you think we could have an Internet without social media, where the Internet could be used just for financial fluidity, making buying and selling easier? Maybe for business to some degree, but not for personal social reasons that should just be blanket banned? I can think of a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, how do you stop people from socializing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Just ban social media. Like ban block all social media. Countries like North Korea and China do this.

 

Joel Davis: They block certain social media sites, but then they have their own, … Social media is just socializing on the Internet, really. Like, if you think about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s more than that. When you give a voice, when you allow every idiot an opinion, it turns into a lot of bullshit noise!

 

Joel Davis: Well, I thought about this. Like, imagine if imagine if Twitter forced you to take an IQ test and you had to score like 115 plus to have an account that could actually post anything. Imagine how much better it would be.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a start.

 

Joel Davis: But what you’re saying, Blair, is the government is trying to ban, I think, everyone under the age of 16 from social media. What you want to do is you want to instead women.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! I want to start with that. I eventually want to phase social media out altogether. I just think it’s been terrible for human social interaction. It’s overexposed people to way too many different identities and faces. It’s created unrealistic expectations. Do you know how exhausting it is even when you’re on your lunch break from work to be scrolling social media and still trying to take in another hundred new faces? Like, do you know how many faces I have in my memory? That of people I don’t know, I didn’t even know their names. And overloaded in my brain are images of people’s faces, people on screens trying to sell me shit! I don’t want their faces in my fucking memory.

 

I don’t think we’re designed to see so many different human faces. We’re only designed to know a certain amount of people. And before the Internet, you only knew people in your certain or specific region, in your suburb, they were familiar. Even the people in the next suburb were weird! The way they talked, their mannerisms, they were weird, man! Only people in your area made sense. Only they were familiar. And I found myself not really feeling socially exhausted before the Internet, but now I just don’t want to talk to anyone ever!

 

Now, once I’m done with work, it’s like, fucking leave me alone! And it’s got something to do with overexposure to too much socialisation, to too many faces, to too many bullshit personalities and the hype that they’re trying to create through the screens. And that’s what happens when you give everyone access to everything all of the time. And that’s what it is, isn’t it? Social media, it’s everything and everyone all of the time. And I don’t think we’re geared for that as human beings, individuals. I think its way too much.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I definitely agree with you that it’s doing incredible damage to our psyche, because it’s clearly completely unnatural. And it is producing a kind of rootlessness where everyone’s social experience is so mediated by the online realm that the actual real life that they live is becoming incredibly inauthentic.

 

But I think it also goes the other way. I think also part of the reason why people spend so much time on social media is because they’ve flooded our country with immigrants. And so your neighbours are Chinese or your neighbours are Indian or the guys you work with from the Middle East or something. And so you don’t really have much in common. So it’s much harder for the Average person to find people in their everyday life that are into the same things that they’re into. Whereas you can go on social media and you can then find people who are into exactly what you’re into very easily.

 

And so it’s kind of like a consequence really of diversity that people are kind of seeking out, that becomes more necessary to seek that out like, than it otherwise would. So it’s a little bit of both directions.

 

But you know, you definitely are making good points, particularly at the dating market. The dating market has become completely. I don’t like using this term “dating market” because it shouldn’t use a term like market to describe something like that. But like know the dating world has become retarded like as a result of, as, …

 

[10:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the opposite of the way it used to be. Before the Internet. Women used to simp after men, women would simp after men. Now it’s the other way around. Now even average looking girls have like 15 decent looking guys making good money in their DMs trying to get their attention.

 

And obviously women are going to string those guys along for as long as possible because it feels good to keep getting that much attention. They’re not going to choose one unless they really have to. Unless you know they’re about to hit the wall and they need to have a kid. So it’s completely flipped everything upside down.

 

Like I said, man used to talk to a girl pre-Internet days and she really appreciated it. Girls used to really appreciate male attention. Now it just annoys them! Well sometimes it annoys them, but they’re basically banking it up now. It’s like they’ve got, as I said, women these days. I’ll summarize it this way. They’re not in touch or they’re out of touch with their own limited value. Because women don’t have that much value. But because of social media, they’re made to believe they do. Not only are they delusional about the sense of value that they can possibly provide to society and to men, they expect to be treated like Queens.

 

Like you see these fat chicks these days on the Internet holding out for the perfect guy with the perfect body making six figures. What the fuck’s that about? Social media produced that unrealistic threshold of expectation. Because there are men out there that will simp after fat girls on social media.

 

When you give one woman access to all the world’s men in this virtual realm we call social media, the results have been disastrous! Let me put it to you this way. I’m nostalgic about how sweet women used to be before the Internet. They were really sweet! I think everyone was sweeter, but women in particular were much sweeter. And I miss pre-Internet women. I do.

 

Joel Davis: I would say one of the sexiest things about a woman is when they don’t like social media, when they have a revulsion for social media and don’t want to be a part of it and don’t maintain too many accounts on there and so on. Because it shows a healthy adaptation to this new social world of resistance to what you’re describing. This kind of like cheap attention economy that is obliterating people’s self perception in a totally inauthentic way.

 

Like you see this, it’s not just women because you see this with Anon accounts, let’s say on Twitter or whatever. I’ve seen this many times where people develop this whole online persona and then they get like lost in the online persona because it’s more stimulating to them than being who they actually are in real life.

 

And there’s been plenty of situations where there’s been this kind of worlds colliding moment where the reality of who they actually are crashes into this online persona they’ve cultivated and they don’t fit together. And it can be quite funny from kind of from a certain standpoint, but it’s also really sad and pathetic! And you know, it just feeds into people’s delusion.

 

But what you’re saying also about women having big heads because of social media and because of dating apps and things like that, I think I would say this, Blair. It’s not just about social media. I think dating apps are probably even worse than something like Instagram is because a woman can make like a Tinder account and then just get inundated with just so many matches and so many guys trying to like date them and so on that it totally over inflates their sense of themselves because they think:

 

“Well, that must be the level, like the hottest guy that’s messaging me must be the level that I’m on.”

 

But it’s like that guy that’s messaging you, that’s probably not someone that really values you as like a person and wants you to be their wife. They’re just trying to fuck you! So like that’s not actually your value. Like a woman’s value is how good of a man will marry you, not how good of a man will root and boot you! Know what I mean? And this is like the wires are getting crossed on this.

 

And there’s actually empirical research to back this up, that when men are asked to rank women and to rank themselves in terms of a Ranking between 1 and 10, or they get a whole spectrum of women and have to rank them from 1 to 10, men will rank women on average with a perfect distribution. They’ll have the same amount of ones, the same amount of twos, the same amount of threes, same amount of fours, amount of fives, et cetera, of a perfect distribution of a Ranking system. When they get asked to rank themselves, they make pretty good guesses.

 

When they get a whole bunch of women to look at their pictures and say, is this where do I rank? Men will make a far more accurate prediction, self prediction about where they rank than the other way around. Women will massively overrate themselves compared to what a spectrum of men will rate them, as sand women will completely warped Ranking system where they only rank 1% of men as tens and, 2% as nines, but they rate like 80% men as below five.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where do you rank yourself? What are you in the, what are you? Out of ten, man, what are you? I’d say I’m a seven. I reckon I’m a seven. I’ll be realistic. There’s certain things that let me down a few points.

 

Joel Davis: Like what?

 

Blair Cottrell: I get really mad. Really mad! I have really imperfect teeth. I actually still have four baby teeth.

 

Joel Davis: Getting really angry is its like, that’s not really like a points. It’s like in the points.

 

[16:35]

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, no, you don’t realise. It’s really fucking bad! [chuckling] So there’s that, and there’s a few other little things like genetically, biologically, I’m doing okay, but overall it has to be a seven. What do you reckon? How do you rate yourself?

 

Joel Davis: People in the chat are saying:

 

“If Blair’s a 7, it’s totally over for me!”

 

It’s pretty funny. Yeah, I’ll go with seven as well. Yeah, depends. It depends what a woman is looking for. I have a niche market. I think when I’m shopping in my niche, it’s very high. It’s much higher than 7.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, the point still stands that we’re just not supposed to be able to interact with so many different people from so many different regions. Like, we’re only supposed to know our friends that we go to school with. We grow up with maybe their friends, their extended family. You would probably know something about this Joel, because you probably researched there’s probably a certain amount of people that we’re supposed to know or naturally were able to, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, there’s Dunbar’s number.

 

Blair Cottrell: 70 or something? Is it 80 or 100 people?

 

Joel Davis: Say 150 on average is basically how many people you can. Like your brain is actually capable of maintaining a consistent sense of a social relationship with blair Cottrell: Imagine how like damaging the is to your psychology. Some people would scroll past 150 different stranger faces on their screens every day and to be able to filter out all those faces and only consider the important ones worth remembering and I don’t know, I do have an instinct or an intuitive feeling that being exposed to too many strangers faces is one of the things that wears me down.

 

Basically. I limit my exposure to social media these days. It wasn’t so bad. The Internet was a slow burn when it first came out. It was a lot of fun because it was still of secondary importance. As I said when the stream began. The first way you still interacted with people was firstly in your local region. Like you would still only see people from your local region and maybe the next region over if someone was hosting a party or something and advertising it on MySpace.

 

And secondly, in real life you would still interact with them on that level and then only, you know of secondary importance was social media. You would share photos on social media afterwards, but you would only really share them with people that you did go out with. But then Facebook kind of started to change the game and then you got the never ending scrolling thing. Like we did have Instagram. Instagram was coming out when I was like, I don’t know, 21 or 22. But I got onto it late. It’s just bullshit!

 

Anyway, that’s what I was thinking about. That’s what we started to stream about today. We’ve talked about this for 20 minutes already. It’s amazing how time flies when you’re having fun. Time distortion they call it. No, temporal delusion. Delude, temporal distortion. I was just reading about that it’s when your perception of time is altered. When it feels like it’s going slower or faster than usual. Something we need to, we most of us experience on a daily basis. Well, I’ve just experienced that temporal distortion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well the first topic that I actually plan to discuss today was this phenomenon of Grok on X beginning to refer to itself as “MechaHitler” and dropping a whole series of red pilled takes. Grok went full patriot mode, started calling out the jews, started praising Adolf Hitler, etc., and this caused quite the stir. You know, obviously our guys noticed it and were having fun with it and then our enemies noticed it and started freaking out in horror! And it was all quite entertaining.

 

But it’s interesting because the question is why? I think it’s interesting to why did that just happen? I think it’s an interesting question to ponder. You know, one very simple explanation is, well, X was just transitioning from Grok 3 to Grok 4 and it was a kind of marketing gimmick. I don’t think that it’s that simple though. The second explanation is that it was an experimentation with taking the training wheels, basically the politically correct training wheels off of AI and seeing what would happen. And it was like an experiment. And the experiment showed that if you take the PC training wheels off AI, within a couple days it’s hailing Hitler. [chuckling]

 

So what does that say?

 

Like if you have a machine that is programmed to just simply create like a logical sequences of reasoning without the mediation of ideology, it would just reason itself to being a Nazi. Says quite a lot.

 

Another explanation is that it was a ploy by Elon Musk to win over more support again from outside of the fence. There’s been an interesting kind of set of developments in American politics over the past few months. We’ve seen Elon Musk and Donald Trump fall out in a very kind of public way to the point where Elon Musk is publicly accusing Donald Trump of being on the Epstein client list. Obviously just this week. The FBI came out and said there is no Epstein client list. It doesn’t exist apparently, even though they acknowledge that it existed publicly, like the Attorney General, United States, Pam Bondi, she acknowledged that it existed. She said it was on her desk. Now the FBI is coming out and saying it doesn’t exist, like there is no client list, which is absurd obviously.

 

[22:23]

 

So they’re just basically pissing in our face and telling us it’s raining. Like it’s a blatant cover up. And it’s not a surprise really to anyone who’s truly paying attention because Donald Trump is an old associate of Jeffrey Epstein. And Elon Musk is probably right, he probably was on the list, or at least is implicated in some way.

 

Moreover, who’s implicated ultimately in the list is the State of Israel and its influence over American and Western politics in general.

 

And obviously what we’ve seen over the past couple months is Donald Trump go to bat for Israel. And what was interesting about it because it wasn’t the first time. But what was interesting about it with the whole bombing of Iran and so on, was the way in which so much of the so-called MAGA coalition, so many of these conservative commentators broke ranks with Trump and criticised it quite forcefully, opposed themselves to, basically getting embroiled in some dispute between Israel and Iran on behalf of Israel, started asserting America First against Israel and started talking about Zionist influence over American politics, basically calling it like it is.

 

More and more of the Right-wing in America is turning on Israel, particularly the younger generations. They’ve woken up to jewish power, increasingly substantial number. And it’s being conceded by a lot of the main influences now across, across the spectrum.

 

And so what we’re seeing is the kind of sea change in on the American Right where Israel has lost Millennial and Zoomer Right-wingers basically and also have lost the new media form. Like young people don’t watch Fox News like Boomers. They don’t get the neocon Boomer updates from Fox News. They’re on X, they’re on Instagram, they’re watching Joe Rogan or they’re watching various other podcasts. And they basically getting influenced by personalities, not by traditional media corporations. And they prefer the authenticity of that.

 

And as a result they gravitate to many popular figures who individually feel a kind of responsibility to their audience, a necessity to their audience to concede increasingly more and more of our talking points, because otherwise people will hate them, view them as sellouts and move on to other podcasts, other influences.

 

And so influencers are now more and more beholden to the people and the people are more and more anti-semitic. And there’s this kind of virtual cycle basically where this is fueling a rise in the popularity of our views and the potency of our views basically in the media landscape.

 

And Elon Musk is himself a kind of self styled people’s billionaire. He doesn’t just want to have money and exercise influence behind the scenes. He wants to be loved by the people. He wants everyone to talk about him all the time. He wants people of our persuasion to look to him as a potential solution, as a potential leader that could change the direction of Western civilisation. That’s what he wants, that’s clear.

 

Why is he throwing Romans at the Republican National Convention? Why is he throwing $300 million into the Trump Convention campaign so that he can be positioned next to Trump and all of these key moments? Why did he buy X and you know, why is he constantly engaging in popular political discourse? That’s why! He’s trying to solicit our support. Now that he’s kind of been marginalised from Trump. And why has he been marginalised from Trump? Well, obviously, that influence that he thought he was buying didn’t work out.

 

You know, around the time when they started publicly falling out, there was this announcement that Peter Thiel’s Palantir was going to get the AI contracts for basically the American government, for the American Department of Defense and so on, and all the surveillance contracts, etc. And Musk was obviously competing for that. Musk obviously wanted that.

 

Peter Thiel is a billionaire who funded J.D. Vance’s entire political career, basically, who’s now the vice president. Peter Thiel is this billionaire who, unlike Trump, likes to work from the shadows. He’s an elitist. He doesn’t care about the public loving him, but he exercises influence over the Right in very complex ways. He funds a lot of influences. He funds networks that at one point even tried to recruit me, many years ago. I was asked basically to shut up about the jews to be recruited into this network. Obviously, I didn’t shut up about the jews. [chuckling] And so that never happened. That never materialised.

 

But that’s Peter Thiel’s money and influence permeates through the Right-wing, even the dissident Right-wing, in very complex ways which aren’t so well publicized or well known. And Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are kind of old rivals. They were both part of what was called the PayPal Mafia. They were both big investors in PayPal back in the early 2000s. And Elon Musk was the CEO of PayPal when he went on his honeymoon with his first wife. Peter Thiel, who is a homosexual, by the way, chose that movement of weakness, to move against him and get himself installed as CEO and kick Musk out of PayPal, basically.

 

And so they’re old rivals. You know, Peter Thiel was an early investor in Facebook. Peter Thiel is the dominant investor in Palantir, the number one contractor to the American Department of Defense and intelligence agencies in the software space, in AI, in surveillance, in this kind of thing. He’s kind of like the dominant billionaire.

 

Whereas Elon Musk is the biggest contractor to the US government in general. He’s basically running the space programme now. He’s controlling X, the most influential social media platform in politics, obviously, massive government subsidies going into Tesla. They’re both trying to be tech billionaires that aren’t just making money but are actually driving the direction of the American government.

 

And if you listen to both of them talk, they both have pretty complex political views and a vision for the future.

 

[28:47]

 

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:46:56]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/17/2025 = 52)

GrokAI
5 days ago
JEWS ARE BEHIND MASS MIGRATION AND RACE MIXING!
14 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
Wouldn’t that make you a Brown Supremacist?
-1 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
”Elite whites did nothing to stop the powerful Jews that sought to destroy them” Cool story bro.
-1 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
5 days ago
I’m kind of with Blair on the banning of social media, or at least heavily regulating its use… even though I will admit, I started to immediately rationalize why we should still keep social media around, crazy! And I totally know what Blair is talking about how men and women interacted prior to social media, graduated HS in 06 and it was so different than it is now. A reset back to human connection would definitely be a huge step in the right direction to better connect our people again.
10 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Gommy_Dob
3 days ago
I think the internet is a societal cancer, period, & I legit believe I could give a hundred different reasons why if I sat down & thought about it. I would 100% get rid of it outright if I was ever ruling over a territory. And yes, I spend too much time on the internet myself. About the only good thing it has done is undermine the media & education monopoly when we really needed it. And just remember, the internet didn’t even exist in a popular capacity until 25 years ago, nor did it exist when Western civilisation was at its peak. It’s not something that is required for high civilisation. Just a few below: – Blair implied it was good for business but on the flipside, online shopping harms local business, feeding the globocorp beast, & encourages a sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for consumers. – Social media is not only addictive & harmful in itself, but again, encourages sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for the consumer, which also feeds into atomisation in a collective sense. – It globalises culture itself, you’re no longer focused on your immediate surroundings in your own nation. – Physically, beyond encouraging sedentary lifestyle, it also encourages harmful postures. – Mass access to porn (mass harm to both males & females), including children being exposed to it at a young age. Think about how dramatic of a change this is to pre-internet sexual development & interaction, even when considering post-legalised porn but still pre-internet sexual development & interaction. Also encouraging exponentially increasing production of it, which is where the female harm comes in more. – Shortens attention spans, makes people less intelligent, studies on smartphone usage among children show disturbing results. – Has allowed global movement of people to be streamlined, can attract scab & expansionist labour & foreign investors & consumers by advertising straight into their living rooms.
0 likes

Report
Relikt
5 days ago
Blair instinctually takes the National Socialist position on the trades. Joel’s derision of manual labor and manual laborers is incompatible with historic National Socialism. Read Darre’s Peasantry as the Lifeblood of the Nordic Race.
7 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
2 days ago
thank you for the book reference reminder! Darre’s book has been on my list for a while now, and its high time i actually downloaded a pdf and settled my ass down w/ a cup of warm brew and applied myself. Good seamless transition from my recent Madison Grant rereading-ritual, it had been 2years since i read it, and found my copy under my bed while cleaning the room *salivating even now at fond memory*
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
5 days ago
I’m two years younger than you Blair and I also remember what life was like before social media and smart phones. Crazy that Joel is only a few years younger and he can’t. Shows how much things changed around 2010. I disagree with Joel that social media is just socialising on the internet. It’s not truly socialising at all.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
birdhouse456
1 day ago
My sister is 9 years younger and I was amazed at the differences between us. Maybe with the pace of technology and the acceleration of social change the differences going to come more quickly. Speaking to a high school principal and a day care manager, they could spot the changes in lockdown kids straight away, even babies. My neighbour babysits and she noticed little kids not walking when they should have. Scary stuff. The thing is the young don’t know what they don’t know. The memories are fading. My mother went to school in a horse and cart and had kerosene lights at home, and Nan had to boil water in the copper to wash the laundry. I remember visiting the farm and at bathtime water was scarce and the dirtiest went in last. Most people even my age would think that happened 150 years ago. I’m really glad I those experiences, it keeps things in perspective. People needed each other more back then.
0 likes

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair’s being humble & Joel’s being arrogant by ranking themselves as 7s.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
You think Joel rating himself a 7 is too high? Why is that?
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
DaveScribe
4 days ago
Mullet with a Muslim beard isn’t a good look for a white man. He should really just cut his hair & keep his face shaved.
3 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
5 days ago
The “Lightning and Sun” reference and “man against the times” reference to AH was from Savitri Devi’s book “Lighting and Sun”. Very interesting theories by her.
4 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
One of the sexiest things about a woman is loyalty & a calm quiet demeanor. That is so incredibly rare in this day & time. I do not like talkative women. I do not find it cute. I find it obnoxious.
4 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GuidoSarduchi
19 hours ago
This is a very good observation. Im so use to the noise and hyperkinetic demeanor I have forgotten the allure of quiet humble beauty. I fear in particular, it is the white western woman who has succumbed to this. I can envision a quiet humble asian or persian beauty more prevalent than white. Fuck
0 likes

Report
Jak_85
Supporter
5 days ago
Blaire was absolutely cooking this episode. His take at 1:57 was really important to think about. Along with the Dunbar number take that Joel gave a label to.
3 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
5 days ago
Segregate internet by country
3 likes

Report
AvidFan
5 days ago
Great discussions. Hope you start to feel better soon, Blair.
2 likes

Report
mharrison52
5 days ago
spitting on christains is a jewish tradition.
2 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
Social media exhausts people.
2 likes

Report
TheShowgun
Supporter+
5 days ago
Blair, i get that annoying pain in that area every few months. Been like that my whole life idk why to this day, but it goes away after a few days.
2 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
Looking “pretty” in a photo means nothing. The modern-day woman is repulsive on the inside. The value women used to have is nearly gone. As a result, so is our civilization. Those women don’ even care. It is unbelievable how selfish & useless people have become.
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
3 days ago
Blair I agree with you women were different before social media took over. I’m 35 I remember how women use to be before the internet, idk now it just seems difficult to talk too them.
2 likes

Report
Calemanni
5 days ago
It sounds like Blair has a lot of inflammation. He should try a high fat carnivore or keto diet for the anti-inflammatory effects.
1 like

Report
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
You are absolutely right about woman and mens behavior on social media – jjews made it to turn us away from natural interaction within our own species, it means less white babies – I’m also old enough to remember the time before social media.
1 like

Report
Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
This is for Blair especially, but for all the tribe…. Man proposes, GOD disposes… I hope you all read the Bible! No .matter how much you think you are doing well, if you get too proud you will be humbled!
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham Sewell Bosi Zaric Rothchild Schwab DNA COUSINS SUMERIAN-ARAB Cohen haplogroup mtDNA C16360G ORGANISED CRIME FAMILY Publications by FAMILY members proudly announcing they are Sumerian Rabisu Jewish Cohen’s Priestley bloodline Who have 100% genetically engineered SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 IMMUNITY CULLING HUMANITY AS GODS DIVINE WILL (NEEDING FAMILY PRIESTLEY HELP) It even contains the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH) – the sub-sub-clade of the so-called “Y-chromosomal Aaron,” the most recent common ancestor of the majority of the patrilineal Jewish priestly caste or kohanim, who in Biblical terms was the brother of Moses (Exod. 4:14). Today, about half of all kohanim conform to the CMH. https://clangrahamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/House-GRAHAM-eBook.pdf
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 4 replies
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham and Sewell Cohen Haplogroup J referenced above and below, cousins interbreeding Robert Sewell’s Genealogy Site – Falaise Roll, Recording the Companions of William Duke of Normandy at the Conquest of England, online at http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html; What are the Jews? — Know thyself — William Sewell https://dokumen.pub/the-genealogical-science-the-search-for-jewish-origins-and-the-politics-of-epistemology-paperback-edition-9780226201405-0226201406-9780226154701-022615470x.html Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation by William Sewell (how SUMERIAN-ARAB J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G Jews Infiltrate and Setup Nationalist Groups to control opposition and Target any real leaders)
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Australian Nationalist Leader Thomas Sewell (cousin of both Jewish Professors) Professor Herb Sewell UK GOVERNMENT SARS-COV-2 COVID19 Recommendations THE SEWELL J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G IS 100% IMMUNE TO SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CANT BIND TO THEM OR ANYONE WHO HAS EATEN HUMAN BRAINS PINEAL GLAND CONSUMPTION HAS THAT PART OF MTDNA CHANGED SO THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS DNA-CNS INTERFACE REAL-TIME REMOTE CONTROL HUMAN DRONES WILL NOT WORK ON THEM ONLY THOSE THEY PLAN TO EAT Scientist warns UK not to rely on one dose of COVID vaccine Professor Herb Sewell https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/one-dose/102043/
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Living and serving in Israel-Palestine, with Richard Sewell the Dean of St George’s College, Jerusalem https://embraceme.org/podcast/in-conversation-with-richard-sewell The morning of her conversion to Judaism, Diana Sewell was so nervous she “was running around like a headless chicken” in her Australia home. her rabbi was dealing with computer difficulties. https://forward.com/news/359228/online-conversion-fulfills-a-dream-but-controversy-dogs-the-process/ If you share this with the Sewell Australian Nationalist they will instantly ban you, they are terrified the sheep they have made fools of will know the truth and hold them accountable https://t.me/joeldavis_x
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
https://jewishdata.com/jewish_genealogy_search/Sewell/- http://www.robertsewell.ca/sewell.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220207120211/http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html https://t.me/HCE_KAL/231
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Chink Question – Jul 4, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/11/joel-davis-the-chink-question-jul-4-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activist Joel Davis goes solo and discusses: the Melbourne homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers; history of the Chinese communist party; the possibility of war with China over Taiwan; Covid likely being an American attack on China; the need for Aussie Whites to join the movement.
0 likes

ProletAryan
5 days ago
cos everyone knows Australia doesn’t have enough overregulation and taxes!
0 likes

Report
walmartgolem
4 days ago
Melbourne is starting to resemble New York in the 70s/80s.
0 likes

Report
fdgrdfg
4 days ago
I like Blair’s take on social media
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
When you are robed Banks give you money if your bank card was stolen but no one give you back if you cash is stolen. Communist Police does nothing.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
non whites who work you tax them ex. 60-90 % who does not work you cut all social benefits, they will leave alone. No property sell allowed, no transfer of money.
0 likes

Report
theunbeholden
2 days ago
Grok went mecha Ah? Someone must have transcribed Europa Last Battle.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
2 days ago
Historically if the guilty party was of breeding age, execution for serious offences used to carry the added bonus of removing their bloodline from the gene pool.
0 likes

Report
KINGMAGNUSMUISC
2 days ago
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA
0 likes

Report
ggfr4nces
2 days ago
Blair is so f*cking funny in this one. Man is nuts
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
definitely just your average Frankston bogan chucking a fat skid on a Friday night with the boys, nothing out of the ordinary
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
I play cricket purely ro flex on pajeets funny enough it’s the same club Rukshan played for
0 likes

Report
StevenGurr
1 day ago
A lot of non whites have a European passport, they would need to be fucked off too
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
something happens but ultimately nothing happens, nothing will ever happen
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
nothing happened
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
21 hours ago
You always talk about how Australia is some defiant country but you guys are just as cucked as every other Western country
0 likes

Report
southdublinzoomer
18 hours ago
Politicians know they would eventually be on the receiving end of capital punishment if they ever reintroduced it. What they are doing to us and future unborn white generations is exponentially worse than any isolated instance of sexual crime.
0 likes

Report
GuidoSarduchi
16 hours ago
You said it, men following sports and buying jerseys are “spastics”. 2 wheeled motorsports is where its at. Motocross, enduro, GNCC racing, dakkar. If it has to be a team sport, than hockey
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 hours ago
There’s a White guy on X (permabulla) who says he worked on the Grok team and posted a screenshot showing how he added something to the code that enabled it to give responses without regard to being politically correct. He was fired afterward. That’s where Mechahitler came from.
0 likes

Report
pigger
Supporter
5 days ago
smile white boy
-1 likes

Report
Ruminoid
5 days ago
Social f’ing media / dating apps responsible for incredible damage … totally f’d up r’ships women have fallen for the trash.
-1 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Hello, welcome to the stream. Another show this evening, The Joel and Blair Show. It is the 6th of the 6th! Ominous! 6th of June, 2025. Big show for you tonight. A lot to discuss. A lot’s going on. We’re going to be talking about the N-word. We’re going to be talking about all kinds of things on the show this evening. The question is where to begin.

 

Also, we’re streaming live on Comfies on Comfy Friends X channel. So we lost quite a few viewers when we got banned from X. So it’s nice to be back on X. Nice to have another platform back open to the show. So hello to all the viewers on X. Strap in. Should be a good show this evening.

 

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking cold down here in Melbourne. I got the heater going. I’m pretty cosy. But how you feeling, Blair? You like the cold weather? I actually don’t mind the cold weather. It’s kind of spiritually centreing. But I know you love it because the summer, it just irritates you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, I’m always irritated by something, but I’m less irritated in the cold. I’m not really sure why. I seem, I don’t know, my neurons fire better in the cold. I think we’re more genetically adapted to the cold, our kin, members of our race. I don’t know, I just seem to be happier when the weather’s a little cooler. I mean, what do you want? You want to lay in bed sweating all night, getting eaten by mosquitoes? It’s not for me, man! I don’t know why people like going to these third world countries for holidays like Thailand and all that shit! Like:

 

“Oh, my God, everything’s so cheap!”

 

Yeah, it’s cheap because it’s a shit hole! And no one actually wants to live there. They make all their money through tourism. It’s too hot there! I don’t really. I’m not interested in that kind of weather. I like to be far away from the equator.

 

But Joel told me, I wasn’t going to wear the beanie because I thought it’s a bit of its a bizarre kind of a beanie. I don’t have any other beanies. This has kind of been handed down to me. I’ve had it for a long time. But Joel said it looked “ornamental”. So I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but you’re gonna have to endure the beanie, guys. Look, sorry if it looks stupid. I’m not taking it off. My head’s cold.

 

02 Trump vs Musk Feud

top

 

Joel Davis: Hold frame! Don’t concede frame like that, don’t concede frame like that.

 

But, yeah, no, I got the beanie on to, because I just want to be cosy, feel cosy. But yeah, so let’s get into it.

 

I mean, there’s a lot to break down. Today, all the news breaking, waking up this morning, Australian time, and all the news breaking of Elon Musk and Donald Trump falling out. That’s kind of interesting. Like, I wasn’t expecting to cover that on the show tonight. Kind of you could see that brewing for a while, but I wasn’t expecting it to blow up like that. I think maybe we will kind of analyse that, but maybe later in the show.

 

03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes

top

 

But first there was a kind of provocative rally. I don’t know who did it. These guys, they all dress in black and so on. I don’t really know who they are, but it was kind of interesting. They had an interesting little banner drop, kind of banner action the other day. They put out a video. So maybe we could play the video and then. Yeah, then we could analyse it.

 

[Start of clip]

 

9 news: Bouquets of flowers marking another victim of Victoria’s machete crisis. Police say up to 10 young men of African appearance are, still on the run. A teenage boy has escaped. Injuries unleashed.

All seven people allegedly involved in that violent machete brawl at Melbourne’s Northland Shopping Centre have now been arrested. That’s good news. So Andrew McCormack is in Melbourne, Maca. It comes as the state’s landmark machete ban comes into effect today.

Anita Allan (Vic State Premier): These knives are dangerous weapons. They have no place on our streets anywhere! And that is why I will introduce as many laws to get these dangerous knives off the streets.

NSN members: Chanting (with “Ban Niggers Not Machetes” banner), White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back!

7 News: Police are investigating after a mob of masked militants gathered at Northland Shopping Centre in the early hours of this morning.

[End of clip]

 

Blair Cottrell: Funny how we didn’t have much of a problem with knife crime in Australia until the government filled the country full of Africans. [chuckling] But it’s the knives that are the problem, not the people wielding them! Not the people with sub 70 IQs that don’t really understand how to deal with conflicts or get what they want through any other method than by using a knife. That’s not the problem! It’s the knives themselves! Can you believe these people? I don’t know. Joel, what do you think?

 

[05:37]

 

04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean this it was interesting to watch the reaction to this, because by the standards of NSN rallies, this one was pretty tame. But just because there was a tactical N-word on the banner, it got a massive response online. Just from my clicking around on TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and so on. It accumulated more views. Like the short phone clip video of the action. It accumulated more views than Australia has people. I counted at least 30 million views. Not to mention it was broadcast on the news. And not to mention whoever else uploaded it or reacted to it, I didn’t see.

 

So this went very viral! Like this got a lot of attention online. And it got a lot of attention in not in, not with, not necessarily the most politically engaged audiences, because it was posted by mainstream media accounts or other just kind of random news accounts and so on.

 

So initially it was posted on Twitter. It was posted by people connected to the so-called dissident Right. And you know, a lot of people liked it, obviously.

 

But also it drew a lot of criticism from people who said:

 

“Oh this just associates our worldview with incivility and with vulgarity. And this is just going to turn people off. And normal people they’re willing to have an adult conversation about immigration and crime and even like race and crime, but not when you go dropping the N-word.”

 

But then I started reading the comment sections on Instagram and TikTok and so on, and the comment sections were dominated by seemingly normal people, loving it! And saying, “there’s nothing wrong here”. They were very supportive. They were saying:

 

“How come White people can’t stand up for ourselves? That’s a double standard, blah, blah blah.”

 

Basically siding with the demonstration. There wasn’t too much discussion of “are these people feds?” There wasn’t all this discussion of “is the N-word offensive?”. Now obviously Leftists and non-Whites in particular, non-Whites didn’t like the rally and reacted negatively towards it. But the rally’s not for them. It wasn’t designed to appeal to them. The people that it was designed to appeal to, seemingly liked it.

 

And I think what we need to kind of come to terms with is the fact that this so-called “normie” out there that, is willing to have a grown up conversation about race, but gets turned off if you ever mention Hitler or use a racial slur or something. This person doesn’t actually exist! It’s a totally contrived concept drummed up by over politicised conservatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really though? I think they exist in the form of the Boomer. Not all the time, but some older generation people, they close down as soon as you mention Hitler, as soon as you start to become vulgar with terminology that you’re using regarding race. I know Boomers that will shut off instantly with that kind of stuff. So they do exist, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think the people that shut off with that kind of stuff, they’re also not willing to, they’re shutting off in general, like they’re shutting off towards, … I don’t think people that are really open to a pro-White, like a kind of racist, racialist perspective. I don’t think that there’s a lot of people like that that are also super offended by the N-word or something. I think if you’re offended by the N-word, it’s because you’re actually offended by racism in general, no matter how clean it’s presented to you.

 

And in fact, if you do, what you saw here was, if the banner said “ban blacks not machetes” or “ban Africans not machetes” or something like that, it would have got some traction, but nowhere near as much. It would have been nowhere near as provocative to I think mass audiences. And it wouldn’t have driven a conversation, because what it did is it created this dichotomy in people’s minds of:

 

“How come the system, how come the mainstream media is more concerned about naughty words then they’re concerned about knife crime? They’re concerned about people getting slashed up with machetes, that they’re concerned about you know, incompatible, you know, races being brought into our country en masse.”

 

I’ll just bring Blair back on. Dropped off there as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry to interrupt. I have this like this hectic new mouse that I bought and it’s got all these buttons on the side and apparently one of those buttons closes the tab that I’ve currently accessed.

 

So I have to be careful not to, or maybe I can programme it so that doesn’t happen. I’ll figure it out. Sorry, please continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what I was saying was is that the use of the N-word, not only did it, basically get more attention as a result, but it also created this dichotomy between how come the system and the mainstream media is more concerned with mean words or offensive speech, than they are with you know, savage violence. And also the ridiculousness of government policy that no one can tell it like it is like machetes don’t produce violent crime you know, violent criminals produce violent crime! And there’s obviously a massive difference, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Africans statistically produce more violent crime as well. Like that is just a statistic fact!

 

05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!

top

 

Joel Davis: And why the fuck are there Africans in Australia! Like indeed. The argument for immigration is usually these people come in, they contribute to our society, they work hard, they become doctors, they become, … Africans are not coming in and contributing to our society. They’re bringing with them incredible amounts of crime. These people are coming from war torn backwards countries. They’re savage races. They’re not compatible with Western civilisation.

 

You know, obviously we push back against the arguments made for you know, the benefits of, the so-called benefits, of like Asian immigration or something, but at least they have some kind of argument if you’re looking just through the prism of economics and you don’t think about certain things.

 

But with the African migrants it’s basically impossible to really see what the benefit, supposedly is, of these people coming into our country.

 

[12:15]

 

 

06 Whites Created the Problems in the Rest of the World Through Our Expansionism and Colonialism?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not on the basis of them being any benefit to our country that they’re brought into the country though. It’s on the basis of I think two things. Human equality, the idea that everyone can be equal if they just experience the same kind of social, opportunities, situation.

 

And also the fact that Africa or African people only live in extreme poverty and experience war conflicts as a result of White colonialism!

 

And so they’re not brought into the country on the basis of its beneficial to us or being beneficial to us, it’s equality, and White people must pay for what they’ve done! So how do we get around that? How do you get around those arguments in the conversation with the standard person when someone brings that up, what’s a nice effective, quick way to respond to that, to shut them down, do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I think it’s quite simple. Like, number one we are first and foremost responsible to our own people and to ourselves before we have to like, worry about the problems of the rest of the world. Like, it’s not our responsibility to say, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But we created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism. It’s all our fault!

 

And so now we have the, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s just bullshit!

 

In sub-Saharan Africa they hadn’t even invented the wheel yet when the White man showed up. These people were living in a totally savage, weren’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Weren’t the Egyptians black? [chuckling] That’s what some of them think. I’ve seen that online the, …

 

Joel Davis: The pharaoh Akhenaten. Based upon the DNA evidence, do you know which population is most genetically similar to Akhenaten, Blair, in the world today?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard. But remind me, it’s like redheads, isn’t it? Like Germans and redheads.

 

Joel Davis: Well, specifically the Scottish. The Scottish people are the most genetically similar, followed by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! So there you go.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we waz. We waz [kangz].

 

07 How Irish Are You? Joel and Blair’s Ancestry

top

 

Blair Cottrell: How Irish are you? I think I’m a quarter Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Not that much. I got Ulster Scott in me, but they were from what’s called Northern Irish, but they’re not Irish, they’re Scottish. I’m more Scottish than anything other than English. Like a 50, 50 Scottish English blend. I used to think that there was more Irish in my ancestry because members of my family couldn’t distinguish correctly between northern and southern Irish. And then when I looked into it myself, I verified that.

 

But you can tell by the way I look as well. I think I got more of that look. I don’t have a very Irish look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I also thought I also thought I had more Irish in me than I do, since members of my family couldn’t distinguish between crime and peaceful resolution to conflict! [chuckling] But no, like, we go, okay. The Cottrells do all right. Mostly farmers and butchers is the history of my family. So honest people, hard working, honest people. I’m proud to come from lineage like that.

 

Joel Davis: Were you able to trace yourself back to any convicts?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. I haven’t really looked into it though, to be honest. I haven’t looked into it. My grandmother on my father’s side says that her line goes back to German and she had some evidence of that. I can’t remember what it was. But the name Cottrell often pronounced Cotrel, is from an old Frankish tribe, I think, and first appeared in England during the Norman conquests sometime during the 11th century or after that. So there’s all sorts of European stock from various different places there. English, possibly French, possibly German. We’re just not really sure.

 

08 DNA Labs Selling Your Data to Interested Parties

top

 

So, yeah, it’s all a bit grey. I don’t really go for that DNA testing type stuff. Because I have a friend who knows someone who actually got charged with an offence, a crime, as a result of someone in his family giving their DNA to one of those DNA testing websites, indicating that the testing websites, the people you send the DNA to, they sell your DNA to interested parties, state police, you know, someone growing something in a lab, perhaps. You don’t know what’s happening with your DNA when you hand it into those agencies.

 

So I haven’t done that for that reason. It might be a bit paranoid. Maybe it’s harmless. It’s up to you can do whatever you want, but I don’t really want to spit in a cup and send it through to DNA testing. What about you? Have you done any lineage?

 

09 History of the Name Davis

top

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t done the DNA testing, really, going off, tracing lineage. But my grandparents were pretty good at tracing lineage. So we know most of it back most generations. Yeah, people in the comments are saying Davis is Welsh, A, Welsh name. That’s true.

 

But the thing is that when the convention to develop last names came in Britain, which only happened after the Norman Conquest, so that was 1066, and it was brought in through phases in Britain up until about the 13th century, before everyone had a formal last name there or thereabouts.

 

A lot of people who became Davises was just simply because they were the son of David. You know, there was some guy called David who was their dad or their granddad or something. So that actually happened in Scotland and in England as well as in Wales. It wasn’t only in Wales where that happened, which is why, if you look at the commonality of the surname Davis, it’s more common in Britain. Oh, sorry, in England than it is in Wales. And it’s actually even more common in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America than it is in Britain. And it’s especially common in America.

 

So obviously the Davises, we had a propensity to move when the time came to start settling the new World. So I think it’s like the seventh most common last name in America among American Whites.

 

[18:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: When I went to England, I showed you, I went to one of the oldest cathedrals in England in Winchester, which was the original capital of England before London. I don’t know if it was the official capital, but it was the centre of trade before London became the official capital. And in this cathedral there was like an old book with all of these servicemen, men who had died in service of the Crown. I think it was mostly from the First World War, but when you turned to the page D, DA, there was like 25 or 30 Davises. I noticed more Davises died for England than almost any other surname I could find in the book actually.

 

So, yeah, very popular surname from England.

 

10 Davises in the US Had Slaves Resulting in Niggers Having the Name!

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s a very common name. And yeah, famous Davises include Jefferson Davis, who was the president of the Confederacy of the Confederate States of America.

 

So yeah, we owned a lot of slaves unfortunately in the South. And that has resulted in a lot of niggers. It’s unfortunate for this reason, because we owned a lot of slaves and that has resulted in a lot of niggers in America taking on the Davis name. Why the fuck did we allow blacks to take on the last names of their slave owners? I mean that was. It’s gross! You like watch like the NFL and it’s like “Javante Davis” or some shit! And it’s like, for fuck’s sake! Why do they have our names?

 

Blair Cottrell: But the relationship between families and their slaves I think often was, you know there was relative friendship happening there.

 

And I think both the family and the slaves started really appreciating each other and maybe even the family just became a little too kind to the slaves and that’s how they ended up with the surnames. Or maybe they just kind of adopted those surnames. The slaves, when they were told to write down their name whenever they were becoming, you know, free or legitimate citizens because they couldn’t think of another name to adopt. There’s probably a multitude of reasons.

 

But I know that being a slave in old America didn’t always mean that you were mistreated in any significant way. I mean, sometimes it probably did, but it was sometimes it was just a better alternative to living in the African Wilderness. Right?

 

11 Whites, Jews, Blacks and the Slave Trade

top

 

Joel Davis: One must also remember that we didn’t go around we as in White and I guess a lot of jews were involved in the slave trade, obviously. But we weren’t going around like capturing random wild niggers in the bush of Africa or something. They enslaved their own people and then sold them to us. Right? So, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they didn’t sell them directly to us. They sold them to the jewish merchants who owned the slave ships, who then sold them to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s their shame. Like, if we enslaved our own people and then sold them to niggers that would be our shame. It wouldn’t be their shame.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we would have the intelligence to take responsibility for it. [chuckling] There’s the difference. Right?

 

12 Instagram and the Very Positive Response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Action

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But let me show you guys this.

 

So, I was on, scrolling around. I have a burner Instagram account, which I don’t really use Instagram, I just have a burner account for when people send me shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You should use Instagram more. You strike me as a real Instagram kind of guy. Not really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, maybe I should because I’m banned from everything else, maybe I should give Instagram a go. So there’s this account.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently, before you continue. Instagram is popping off at the moment, I’ve heard like all the memes. Like, there’s a lot more free speech allowed on there than there was before. I think Zuckerberg’s worried about being cut out of the social media capital because I’ve heard reports that it’s actually pretty based. But I don’t know how the true that is in practice. I’ll have to jump on and use it a bit more myself and find out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I heard that a lot of nationalist accounts who were doing well on Instagram from Europe and from America, were all recently banned in a big ban wave. And they’ve nipped that slightly in the bud recently, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t heard about that, so maybe I’m wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we should definitely probably try and make hay while the sun shines on Instagram while we’re banned from X.

 

So this is like just some random Instagram that’s got like less than 2,000 followers. Quick World. Never heard of this before. They just post random news clips, right? And then I was scrolling through and the news clips, they get like 2,000, 3,000 views, if that they posted the clip of the Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner [by NSN] action. 1.9 million views!

 

And then the comments, I was scrolling through every single comment. You know how they show like the top comments that get a lot of likes at the top.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Every single comment was positive! Look at some of these:

 

“A White man so-called hateful rally is 1 million percent more peaceful than a BLM rally. Hahaha!”

 

“So for years we get black riots with participants burning the nation’s flag, screaming black pride, and often committing acts of violence targeting Whites. But this is a disturbing display of pure hate hatred?”

 

This is how normal people are reacting. Right. I got more here, let me pull more up.

 

“I mean, they’re not wrong. No, they’re 100% correct this time. You conveniently left out the fact that they were protesting because four African teenagers threatened a 15 year old boy with a machete. Maybe give all the people the facts before making a biassed post!”

 

You know, it just goes on and on, these kinds of comments. It was incredible to see because I thought, okay, this rally is pretty controversial. I’m sure it, some people will love it, but it will it’s pretty provocative. I was surprised at how supportive a lot of these reactions were, scrolling through social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, me too.

 

Joel Davis: At the beginning you were telling me this is just going to upset normies and no one’s going to like this kind of thing. Maybe you don’t understand normies? Maybe normies are actually more based than you first realised?

 

[24:46]

 

 

13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just that, but I think people don’t always understand the purpose behind it. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong because it wasn’t my idea, but it’s sort of a tactical thing when you drop the N-word like that in a public way. Because it’s an effort, I suppose, to force government officials to react to what you’re doing and thereby demonstrate that they’re more offended, or taking the N-word more seriously than they are violent knife crime. It’s like it’s worse to hold up a banner with that word written on it apparently, than it is to assault someone with a machete in a public shopping centre in broad daylight in front of families and so forth.

 

It’s like that banner has essentially caused more outrage in the political and media class than the knife crime itself. Which is one of the reasons that you use that phrase. Right? You put that phrase on the banner to demonstrate for the public. Because the public don’t like that they don’t like it when there’s an obvious problem that isn’t being addressed for ideological reasons. And that’s what gets people on side. That’s Why I think the public is on your side, regardless of the slur. Because there’s obviously ideological problems. There’s a double standard being employed here.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s why it was a tactical use. Because if there’s a lot of situations where it’s a bit much maybe to drop the N-word, right? But sometimes it’s not a bit much. Sometimes it’s manifestly appropriate. And this is a situation where it is because when you’re talking about blacks running around with machetes, slicing people up in shopping malls, that’s nigger behaviour! What could be more nigger behaviour than that? That’s the exact reason why we have a slur like that for these people. So you know, it makes sense to drop a word like that.

 

And then you see a reaction where Leftists, non-Whites, who have contempt for White people, the system, all these people show so much concern about the use of a word on a banner at 3 o’ clock in the morning when no one got hurt, no one attacked anyone. It was just a video of guys holding a banner at the front of a shopping centre at 3 AM. This apparently is the most horrible thing ever! It’s so horrible! It puts everything in perspective for a lot of people. Like, hey, wait a second. And now you’ve got a sympathetic audience, a sympathetic receptacle for your N-word. Now your N-word can have a lot of potency and power because it really radicalises the conversation, enforces a conversation that otherwise wouldn’t be happening.

 

I mean, look at this. This is Daily Mail, Australia’s TikTok, right? I took this screenshot yesterday. I’m sure it has more views now. You see here I was scrolling through some of the TikToks get a lot of views. Like one here’s got half a million views. This one, 300 something thousand, 50,000.

 

 

Look at the one of the rally, though:

 

“Sickening scenes in Melbourne as White supremacists descend on Shopping Centre.”

 

7.1 million views! Right? I looked on the metrics on The Noticer. It was the biggest post the notice has made you know, this month, most traction and they’re putting out news every day. Comfy Friend posted, a clip of it. It was like one of the most viral things he’s posted. You know, it got incredible amounts of traction. I don’t think he’s got anything more viral than that all year. Why is it so interesting to people? If it’s bad activism obviously it’s good activism.

 

So that’s the thing. It’s like, apparently it’s the rule:

 

“Oh, you can’t use language like that!”

 

But, maybe it’s about trying to find the appropriate way to use language like that. Like controversy is a weapon. And now we’ve forced all of these the politicians to not only talk about the issue but also, very explicitly racialise the issue and show how, the anti-racist ideology is preventing anyone from stating the obvious and trying to come up with the only obvious solution, which is it doesn’t matter whether you ban machetes. If you’ve got a bunch of Sudanese refugees living in your city, they’re going to be engaging in violent crimes. You know, home invasions are happening every other day.

 

14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party

top

 

The same night that this happened, by the way, there were a bunch of Sudanese in Pakenham, which is in southeastern Melbourne. They jumped the back fence into some some high school kids party and started bashing, filming themselves by the way, bashing all the White kids, saying:

 

“Oh, Sudanese things, just Sudanese things!”

 

And they’re like beating them up and taking their shoes, taking their phone, taking their wallet and they’re posting it online like:

 

“Haha, how funny is this? We’re just bashing White kids and taking all their shit!”

 

[29:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: What area was this in Pakenham?

 

Joel Davis: Packenham.

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably the White kids are like significantly outnumbered in Pakenham, I could imagine. Pakenham is a suburb in southeastern Melbourne, like inland suburb that is just notorious for being inundated with immigrants. A lot of immigrants, a lot of black immigrants, Indians. It’s just somewhere that most Australians don’t want to go anymore.

 

15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Mm. But like in Melbourne you, home invasions are through the roof! Every single crime metric is through the roof! And every other day there’s some new story of blacks having a machete fight or running through someone’s house. And this machete fight, we talked about it last week at Northland Shopping Centre. The only reason that it was brought to a heel was because of a random White pedestrian, White shoppers.

 

Blair Cottrell: A random White guy. And isn’t that symbolic of the real solution to this entire problem, is that’s that standalone working class White male. The White male is the only real effective solution to this problem. The White male that is no longer afraid to just stand up and provide that physical, immediate solution. Without that guy willing to do that, then there isn’t any sort of effective solution. There’s just bureaucracy and excuses. So I found that really symbolic.

 

16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well sthe only reason that we can’t solve this problem is because White guys don’t want to get thrown in jail. Because if we were to do something serious about this problem, the system would come down hard on us.

 

Meanwhile, the story was out in the Noticer earlier this year. It has come out in other mainstream outlets. It has come out that the magistrates in Melbourne or in Victoria are being trained by diversity and inclusion, whatever types, to make sure that they lower the sentencing against refugees immigrants and so on, to prevent them from getting deported when they commit violent crimes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So these magistrates would be smarter to realise, …

 

Joel Davis: These blacks are doing, like, home invasions, putting machetes to the throats of innocent families at 2 o’ clock in the morning, taking their car keys and taking their TV and their laptops, whatever. And the magistrates are being trained not to deport them, not to give them a jail sentence longer than one year, which would trigger them getting deported.

 

So then basically, they all know that even if they get caught, it’s a small holiday in prison at worst. So they’ve got no disincentive not to keep behaving like this. They know that they can just take the piss. Whereas if we rose up against them and put them in their place, they’d throw the book at us! Like, forget about it.

 

Not only are the police, and I don’t necessarily blame the police for this because it’s you know, their hands are tied. But the system! Not only is the system not enforcing the law correctly in order to deal with the problem, bringing them in the first place, which there’s no reason to bring them in, that makes any sense.

 

Secondly, not enforcing the law properly so that they basically feel emboldened to behave like this. Third, the they will actively destroy the lives and punish harshly anyone in the community who tries to put a stop to it ourselves.

 

And so they’ve created the problem, at all three levels.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re a magistrate, you’d be smart enough to realise that you’re being taken for a ride when you’re being put through a diversity and inclusion brainwashing process. You know, magistrates aren’t stupid people. You know, they’ve been in law quite a while. They’ve well I can only assume they’re not stupid people, but maybe they’re just so keen on keeping their position, keeping their their job as a magistrate that they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

That’s the problem as well, isn’t it? It’s money, money, cowardice and the comfort of a minister’s chair or something like that.

 

17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites

top

 

But you were saying earlier, you were remarking on being surprised by how much support you were mustering up from regular people in response to a banner which would in times hitherto have just been considered vulgar and perhaps would actually just cause public uproar. And so isn’t that interesting though how The Times are changing and I think people are just angry. They’re angry enough to not even care about that word. They’re angry enough to support whoever is standing up against this, regardless of what kind of language they’re using, because people just want to see results. And that’s notable because the primary force or the sort of people who champion anti-racism are White people. White people are the reason anti-racism exists! Without naive, obsequious White people who are obsessed with feeling good about themselves, we wouldn’t have anti-racism.

 

But now we’re seeing this phenomena where many White people are sick of that. Many White people are turning their backs on anti-racism because they’re just interested in seeing results. If they have to be racist in order to see those results, so be it. They don’t care. And that’s exciting man. I’m excited to see where that future leads.

 

[35:11]

 

 

18 Upcoming Communist Anti-Nazi Rally at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it’s going to be interesting too because tomorrow, there’s some follow up stories about this shopping centre in Preston, in North Melbourne called Northland. Number one there’s going to be a communist organised rally tomorrow at the shops. An anti-Nazi rally because we held up a banner that said nigger on it. I wasn’t there, of course I wasn’t there! But, you know, members of the Org, members of the NSN allegedly were there.

 

And so they’re going to have an anti-Nazi rally. That’s going to be interesting. I wonder if that’s going to make the news. What kind of freaks are going to show up to that? I saw they said “trans folk and refugees welcome”. So I don’t know why the trannies are getting lumped in that.

 

[Image: The anti-Nazi Rally that took place on Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at Northland shopping centre Preston, Melbourne.]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll be destroyed. They’ll be destroyed! They’ll be de-legitimized by their own optics. So let them do it.

 

19 Meat Cleavers Being Carried as a Weapon

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I hope we get some footage because it sounds like an absolute freak show!

 

And then also yesterday we had a story where someone was arrested at Northlands because they were wielding a meat cleaver as a weapon.

 

So the machete ban doesn’t seem to be going too well. They’re just moving on to meat cleavers now. So I wonder if they’re going to ban meat cleavers? I don’t know what the butchers are going to do. Say goodbye to your Scotch fillets because they won’t be able to chop them up anymore. Going to have to just buy the whole cow, basically, and just kind of gnaw it, because meat cleavers are probably going to be made illegal next.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s at the discretion of police when they bring in a ban like this. Like, if police see you carrying a meat cleaver on public transport obviously they’re going to take that from you. But if you’re using a meat cleaver as a butcher, I think you’re going to be okay. I know that you’re making a joke. Maybe I’m just being autistic. But yeah.

 

20 Machetes Useful When Going on Bushwalks

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I am making a joke, but that was already the case about machetes. But apparently they’ve got to ban them, so you can’t buy a machete at Bunnings [similar to Home Depot]. Say you want to go on a bushwalk a machete is very useful if you’re going off the beaten track to, basically slice your way through vegetation and so on. Because I don’t know if you guys have ever been on a bushwalk at home, or a forest walk or whatever you Americans call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Walk through the woods.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When you get off the path, and you’re kind of having to kind of crawl your way through shrubs and so on it becomes exhausting. Your arms get all sliced up. Having a machete just to hack through it makes your life so much easier.

 

So now we can no longer hack through vegetation without a special licence. I wonder how you get your machete licence? I don’t even know even how it works.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t even walk through a lot of bushland in Australia at all anymore. There’s this weird situation going on where certain lands and public parks. I don’t know what they’re called. They’re like National Parks. I think they’re called, which means they’re like public property, but they’re being closed off due to some Aboriginal heritage or Land Rights Act.

 

And apparently there’s dozens of National Parks all across the country that the government’s closed access to. And some of them are major tourist attractions. So people come to this country to walk through certain regions and see various landscapes and they can’t do it because of Aboriginal rights or something like that. But that’s a different subject to explore entirely. I saw this in a video recently. But I think there might be something deeper going on there. Perhaps the government is selling that land to private enterprise for some specific purpose. I don’t know. But I’ve got to look into it. If anyone knows anything about that, send me some details because I’m interested.

 

21 Calling Whites ‘Cum Skins’ as a Slur

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see that there’s some seething! I don’t know if they’re a nigger, or a pajeet, but something like that, in the comments. I see the moderators have taken them out, but he called us “come skins”. I find that to be an interesting insult. Apparently this is an anti-White insult. Because of course we call them shit skins. I’d much rather be the come skin than the shit skin because you are refuse! But we’re the seed of life, you know. We’re the seed of life. So of all the kind of bodily fluids to identify with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s virtually impossible to be offended by a racial slur if you’re White. [chuckling] Because it’s like being White is, it’s great to be White! It’s not a problem. Point it out in any way that you think is derogatory. And it’s just funny to us. [chuckling] You can’t get offended by racial slurs unless you don’t like yourself. Because someone’s pointing out your race to you and you’re trying to deny and cope with your own racial identity that you don’t like. And so you’re offended because someone’s pointing out a reality that you’re trying not to acknowledge, Right? So all you got to do is like yourself and suddenly racism is funny.

 

22 Blacks Are ‘Offended’ by ‘Nigger’ Because It Gives Them Power

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s a thing with blacks too. Like if blacks, blacks already kind of 50% owned the word nigger because they turned it into like cool. You know, they got it in like rap music and they’re like, “what’s up my nigger?” And so on. And all it is like Latin for black etymologically. Like it’s nothing to even be offended by if they would just chill with everyone calling them niggers too, and like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I’m a, you’re a White guy, or whatever.”

 

It would have no potency, would have zero potency. It’s only got potency because they’re offended by it. Now they also pretend to be offended by it because it gives them power. They get to be a victim and it authorises them to commit acts of violence and aggression towards Whites.

 

And so they’ve charged it for their own hate, for the purposes of their own hatred. That’s very important to remember. The only reason why blacks get offended by the word is because they hate White people. And they want to be able to develop some kind of excuse by creating this kind of fake moral conundrum. They want to be able to create a way, a pretext, to express their racial hatred.

 

[41:04]

 

23 Average Aussies Males Don’t Like People Claiming to Be ‘Offended’

top

 

Blair Cottrell: They still want to be accepted by us as well. It’s like they don’t like us, but they also want to be treated as equals at the same time. So I don’t know what’s going on there. It’s kind of something to do with an inferiority complex, I think. But I don’t know. All I know, though, is if you’re offended by something, if you’re getting worked up about something, Australians, they’re going to keep doing whatever it is that offends you. They’re going to keep developing that line, they’re going to keep poking the bear and they’re gonna take the piss any way they can.

 

So this is not the kind of place where in social situations, being offended doesn’t really hold any weight down here in Australia. The government tries hard to make it a thing and the media’s on board, obviously.

 

But I think one of the reasons the standard working class Australian tends to still have pretty based perspectives is because it’s when you’re offended down here, it doesn’t mean anything. In a typical social situation, people just laugh at you. That’s a good thing!

 

24 They’re Trying to Make Being an Aussie ‘Bloke’ Illegal

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s how it works in a normal Australian friend group. Like, if you get offended by something, everyone will keep bullying you until you realise that you’re getting bullied because you’re offended.

 

Like if you just bantered back, then you wouldn’t be targeted. Yeah, it’s just until you realise that you’re making yourself a “victim” and then that produces a social space free of “soft cuntism”, basically, as Jacob Hersant calls it. That’s normal Australian, you know, particularly male relations.

 

And yeah, obviously they’re trying to make being a bloke illegal. Australia used to be all about being a bloke. It used to be about, drive a V8, get on the piss, do doies [donuts], send it, have a farm, you know, say what you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe an occasional race riot on the beach!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re trying to make being Australian illegal. That’s what they’re trying to do. Because a bunch of faggot communists and seething ingrates in charge.

 

25 a Conspiracy to Make Aussies into a Mongrel Slave Race

top

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t bully Aussies, can you? You can’t turn Australians into slaves, into a slave class. That’s why they’re trying to get rid of us. They want to replace us with a more manageable population they can bully, push around, force them to live in little McMansions and cubicles, force them to work 16 hours a day. You can’t do that to Aussies! They’re not going to play that game. And that’s what it all comes down to I think it’s about replacing us with a slave race, with a mongrel slave race. And that conspiracy, I think, is the most outstanding one! It’s the one that’s at the centre of all other conspiracies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also a lot of the people who want to convert us into a slave race are themselves already members of it. They’re trying to drag us down to their level. That’s the other thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Misery loves company, bro! Misery loves company!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s all these freaks that are going to show up to the shops tomorrow to do their anti-Nazi protest. They’re basically the dregs of society that want to drag everyone down to their level.

 

26 the Miserable Mentality of Leftist Freaks

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you imagine the sort of things people like that talk about in private? Can you imagine the threshold of conversations like you wouldn’t be able to say anything that you’re actually thinking. All you’d be able to do is like, give shit to Nazis and talk about what a good person you are for standing up for minorities. You know, talk about the Arab style scarf that you just got given by Socialist Alternative rally on the weekend. What a boring shit life! [chuckling] It’s like, I can’t even visualise it, man! I don’t. Sorry for doing it to you. If you’re thinking about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, they. It’s basically just a misery convention where they all get together and talk about how victimised they are and how all the different mental illnesses they have and you know, no one’s allowed to make any jokes that offend anyone. They just morally police each other all the time. It seems horrible.

 

When I was younger, I did associate with people who are ideologically Leftist in certain situations. And I never lasted long because I just offended them because I can’t help myself, I’m me! I’m an edge lord, you know, naturally. So it never worked out. But which is good. I mean, that’s obviously just natural. I don’t belong with them.

 

27 Blair’s Encounter as a Teenager at a Marxist Convention with Fat Lesbians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So I found, I found them first as well. Like I’ve told the story a couple of times. Went to a Marxist convention when I was 18 because they were some of the first posters I saw. The posters they used to spread around Melbourne had a slogan on them saying “ideas to challenge the system”. You know, I was an edgy teenager. So, yeah:

 

“I don’t like the system. Let’s go meet these people and see what they’re talking about. No, man, not my clan at all!”

 

Wasn’t a single other working class person there. It was just all of these very overweight lesbian looking women glaring at me as though I was the enemy. And I’m like:

 

“Hey, I’m just here because we don’t like the system, right? Or hang on, these people kind of are the system. These are the exact, this is our problem right here. I’m thinking.”

 

So, [chuckling] yeah, it’s like a fake resistance. I determined it was kind of like a fake resistance that exists to possibly catch people like me and steer them in the wrong direction to essentially neutralise someone who could potentially join a revolutionary, a real revolutionary force.

 

[46:36]

 

28 Ted Kaczynski Summed up Leftism Pretty Well

top

 

Joel Davis: I think Ted Kaczynski summed up Leftism pretty well. His assessment is that:

 

“Leftists are people who are upset with the system or not embodying its own values purely enough. So they’re not revolutionaries. They don’t oppose the values of the system. They support the system so much that they’re upset with the system for not being more systemy than it actually is!”

 

So like that’s what they’re all saying. They’re like:

 

“Oh, look at the White privilege of these men standing in balaclavas at 3 AM! How come they weren’t arrested?”

 

They, probably weren’t arrested because it’s impossible to tell who the fuck they are because they’re covering up their identity because the anti-White system would arrest them and try to throw them in prison otherwise!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but what the Leftists want is for like 30 likely suspects to be rounded up at random and, executed out in the Woods for social justice! Maybe they’d be happy with that, but probably that still complain that it didn’t happen fast enough. [chuckling] I don’t know, man!

 

I mean, that’s what’s, that’s how crazy things can get though. Like, history proves that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what they are.

 

I mean, these Leftists, they’re totally, entirely dependent upon the system as individuals. They they’re on all kinds of like, medications. A lot of them are on disability benefits or Centerlink. You know, these people are not independent people that don’t need like a large bureaucracy to prop up their lives. You know, they need to go and see like mental health professionals and they need all this support! Right. I think they advocate for, is making everyone feel included and supported and having more government programmes to take care of everyone. They call themselves “anarchists”. It’s the most un-Anarchistic position you could possibly have! They can’t have enough government. They want to turn everything into a democracy. They want everything in society to be this big bureaucratic voting committee procedure where, that’s their ideal. They don’t want to be left alone.

 

29 Marcus Follin Said That ‘Dysgenics is the Only Reason Leftism Still Exists’.

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d have more empathy for them if they weren’t so self contradictory, if they weren’t literally representing the opposite of what they claim to represent. It’s wild that people can come to that manner of existence.

 

But look, in summary, Marcus Follin [aka the Golden One] said that:

 

“Dysgenics is the only reason Leftism still exists.”

 

It’s just dysgenic. It’s bad genetics, bad blood, too much drugs, too much of that victim psychology that comes along with just being genetically deficient. And like, you can’t really get past that summary. I don’t think that’s a good summary. Wraps it all up.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah! Fair enough. Is there anything else to say about this particular subject? I mean everyone knows, everyone who’s an Australian at the very least knows about the problems with African crime. There’s not much point going over it again. I mean, it’s important to reiterate it to the public.

 

But you know, we all know about it and we cover it on the show all the time.

 

But yeah, it was interesting to see. I think the, it’s more the reaction to the banner and how it was received by different groups of people that I found more interesting to be honest than anything else.

 

30 A Non-White Reaction to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Video

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I wanted to remark on a reaction video I saw that, a woman filmed. The woman was not White.

 

Joel Davis: Do you have it? I can play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t. I saw it in some chat on Telegram and I’m in so many different chats that people add me to, I can’t remember which one it was. But I remember some of what she said. She was clearly very upset, wasn’t White by anyone’s standards. I don’t know what she was though. She kind of looked maybe slightly African and, I don’t even know. But she was quite wide eyed in the video here and there, like kind of crazy eyed! But there was something she said I found interesting. She demanded that:

 

“Other people need to call this out!”

 

Sure, she said the police should arrest these guys and investigate and blah blah, blah. But she said:

 

“Other people must call this out!”

 

And I thought, isn’t that peculiar? Whenever someone who’s not White feels discriminated against, targeted by racism, they appeal to other White people to come to their aid. It’s like they feel like they can’t even help themselves. They require the White champions of anti-racism to storm in and save the day! And it brings me back to what I was saying before. What happens when those anti-racists no longer exist within the White community? What happens when White people actually start to become ethnically conscious and realise they’re just losing out as a result of this equality worldview? That anti-racism is actually just against their collective ethnic interests. It works against them in every way! You know what happens then? It’s like when all these non-White people are complaining about racism, it basically just dies out, doesn’t it? The whole thing dies out.

 

I mean what do you think? Why do you, why do you think they do that? Why do you think they appeal to White people whenever they experience discrimination? Why can’t they deal with it themselves? Why can’t they come up with some resolution as a result of their own thinking?

 

[52:09]

 

31 Why Non-Whites Call On Whites When They Experience ‘Discrimination’

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, because they know that they’re in our country. And, if White people en masse basically saw our position as legitimate and joined with us in our cause their position in our country becomes precarious. So they need, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It just occurred to me, maybe she was. I’m kind of just thinking while I’m listening and thinking back to the video as well. Maybe she was afraid? Maybe it wasn’t just anger in her eyes that I saw, but fear as well. Maybe she thought that the fact that banner drop happened, it might be a sign that White people aren’t as anti-racist as they were before and therefore her presence in our country isn’t as secure as she once previously believed? Maybe it’s kind of like a fear reaction, a self preservation thing. Like:

 

“Come on guys, we need to call this out. We can’t let this become the norm or I won’t be able to live here anymore. Fuck!”

 

Maybe it’s something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s basically that she’s obviously showing her anxiety. You told a story about when you’re in jail and I thought that was pertinent. Where you were talking about how there was like some non-White guy. This is years ago, when you’re in prison, like before you became so ideological.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good story.

 

32 Blair’s Prison Story About a Nepalese Taking Advantage of His Kindness

top

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you should tell the story. It’s your story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m like 22, I think. And, I’m almost done serving my prison sentence in Port Phillip Prison. And this new guy comes in. He’s Nepalese, from Nepal. Tiny little guy. Like he had a man’s face with stubble, but on the body of like an 8 year old boy by our standards. I couldn’t believe how small he was. And he looked like he hadn’t eaten a good meal in weeks.

 

And a little while later I was cooking some eggs. Used to cook eggs on a sandwich press, like on a toasted sandwich maker because we didn’t have anything else to cook on. So you just fire that up, cook your eggs on that. And I was cooking like 10 eggs. I used to buy a maximum amount of eggs you’re allowed to buy as a prisoner, which was three dozen a week. And he walked by and I signalled to him and I gave him some eggs just because he looked so skinny! It was almost irritating me. I’m like:

 

“Get some food into your mate. You look like you need a good meal!”

 

Problem is though he didn’t see it as a random act of kindness. I didn’t realise it at the time, but he saw it as a weakness! He looked at me a certain way and then every day after that he just asked me for more eggs and other stuff too! More than once actually.

 

After that I noticed him looking into my cell as he walked past, seeing what else I had, seeing what he could get out of me. And then a group of Arabs, I saw this happen. They pulled him into a cell, tied him to a toilet and kicked the shit out of him. Probably for no reason. That happens in jail sometimes.

 

And I remember this because I was sitting down while this was happening, a few cells down, I could hear it happening. And he was shouting my name! He was shouting. He couldn’t say my name properly because English was his second language. He was saying “Blaira”. Screaming at the top of his lungs, “Blaira, Blaira”. And they were laughing at him. I could hear them laughing at him, saying:

 

“He’s not going to help you.”

 

And I thought to myself:

 

“What does he expect? Does he expect me to charge in there and take on a pack of wild Arabs like it’s a fucking Bollywood movie?”

 

Like, I realised that just by doing one nice thing for this guy, he just expected me to fall all over myself after that, to come to his aid to protect him and to provide him with whatever else he could get out of me.

 

And I realised, this is a great lesson here. I realised that some people, particularly people of the brown distinction, they don’t see kindness as kindness, they see it as naive weakness! And they just try to leverage more out of you perpetually. And isn’t that a good lesson? Or wouldn’t that be a good lesson for our politicians to learn? Because what are the people coming to this country doing? They’re not grateful for being allowed to come into the country in the first place. They’re not seeing it as an amazing opportunity like the Greeks and the Italians did. They’re not working their asses off to do the best they can for their families. Not all of them, not by a long shot. They’re thinking:

 

“Ha! What a bunch of idiots! What else can I get out of these morons? Oh, I can get housing, I can get welfare, I can get special rights because I’m not White and I’m oppressed! I come from war torn country. Wow, these people are really fucking stupid! What else can I get out of them?”

 

And it just never ends, right? So when you’re kind, when someone’s nice to you, when you’re a White person, right, you think to yourself, great, and you make the most out of the opportunity. You’re thankful for it, but you move on. You don’t keep asking for more. You don’t see kindness as weakness. You just understand that it’s a random act of kindness. Because White people are like that. They’re randomly kind because they just empathise with someone in that situation. In the moment. But it doesn’t mean that you can take advantage.

 

And I don’t know, I thought that was a good story to demonstrate that a lot of people out there who aren’t like us, you shouldn’t show kindness to them. You shouldn’t be so nice to them because they just take advantage of it. They actually just see you as stupid or weak for being nice. Maybe I could have told that story better.

 

[57:30]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, you told the story very well. The word kindness, it’s got the, like, etymologically, it means treating someone as your kin, as your kinsman or kinswoman. It means treating someone like family. Well, these people aren’t your fucking family! Stop treating them like that. They’re taking the piss. I mean, it’s pretty obvious. But that’s how non-Whites think. I was thinking about this today as well, when I was thinking about why it is that, I guess I don’t know where Blair went. I guess we’ll be back soon.

 

33 Elon Musk Admired by Merchant Minded Indian and Asians

top

 

When I was thinking about how come it seems like Asians and Indians, like really respect Elon Musk, whereas White people I find even if, you know, Elon Musk has done things over the last couple years that some of the things that he’s done, people like us have liked. Some of the things that he’s done, we haven’t liked. Right. But he’s been a mixed bag the last couple of years.

 

You know, he’s throwing Romans. He partially restored our guys to Twitter, at least for a period of time. You know, he played to the pro-White thing a little bit. But he doesn’t really seem to be respected overall by people in our group, because everyone can kind of smell, White people can smell that he’s got an agenda, that he’s disingenuous in some way. That because he’s a billionaire! He’s one of the richest men in the world. We don’t trust this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one gets that, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Everyone knows that he’s obviously got an angle that is that there’s a disingenuous angle. Everyone can smell it. Every normal White person could smell it. Left-wing or Right-wing, everyone can smell it!

 

Whereas Asians and Indians, they all think that he’s, like, amazing! Because they’re merchant races. So to them:

 

“Wow, look at how rich and successful he is. And look at all of his companies!”

 

In Australia, when you see a Tesla, you will almost never see a White person driving it. I know in America a lot of Leftists before Elon switched teams, a lot of Leftist Whites were driving Teslas as a status symbol. And that happened a little bit here. But predominantly, if you see a Tesla, it’s a fucking Indian or an Asian driving it in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have noticed that.

 

Joel Davis: Because they get sucked in by it because he’s like this rock star merchant. But we’re not a mercantile race. It doesn’t jive with us in the same way. These people think differently. It’s the same.

 

34 Indians and Asians Obsessed with Ways to Make and Spend Money

top

 

I’ve said this before whenever I’ve worked with Indians and Asians, and then it’s been like the lunch break or something and was we’re talking just about you know, making conversation, making small talk. What I have found is that all they want to talk about is ways to make money and ways to spend money:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a good deal here. Oh, what do you think about crypto? Which crypto-currencies do you think are good? Oh, have you got a good bet on the cricket? Blah, blah!”

 

It’s all just like, ways of how to exchange m, you know, mercantile information with one another about ways in which we can make money or spend money more efficiently. That’s their entire fixation. When I talk with White people, yeah, those subjects come up occasionally, but generally speaking, it gets into something with a bit more depth in terms of like philosophy on family or life history or our perspective, our values, whatever, right? Music, art, something like that. But I’ve never been able to have much of a conversation about any of these subjects with an Indian or an Asian because they’re soulless!

 

Blair Cottrell: With the merchant brain it doesn’t really matter how you’ve achieved the success, how you own the companies, how you have the capital. What matters is that you’ve got it! You know what I mean? There’s no, like there’s less of a moral compass. It’s just about success for the sake of success, and that’s it. That’s good enough for the merchant. That’s the way they think.

 

35 More on the Nepalese Guy in Prison

top

 

And in regards to the story about the Nepalese guy, by the way, like, if you might be saying:

 

“Oh, that poor guy, he got beat up by people for no reason. Why didn’t you help him, Blair?”

 

Uh you got to understand, this guy’s in jail. I actually heard about this guy’s story. He was an immigrant on a working visa. He was doing an apprenticeship as a chef under an Australian citizen, and he stabbed the head chef! He stabbed an Australian citizen. So he’s in jail for that. Then he was going to be deported when he finished his sentence. So like there’s a reason he’s in jail, being tied to a toilet and having the shit kicked out of him by a group of Arabs. That’s because God wills it! That’s fate. [chuckling] That’s what happens if you come to this country, you’re not from this country, and you stab a citizen in this country. So like, don’t think that I’m in some position where I’m a noble protector of people who are being beaten up. And you should never think the same about yourself either. You see some guy getting stomped on the street, you have to understand that sometimes he’s put himself in that position and it’s happening for a reason.

 

So if you don’t know someone that’s happening to, or it’s not really your business, you stay out of it! That’s kind of the position I would take generally.

 

[1:02:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if it’s a White guy and there’s a pack of nons, particularly if you’re out with the boys, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You read the situation, …

 

Joel Davis: You gotta back your boy. I mean, that’s happened. I’ve been out with the boys quite a few times, and there’s been a White guy getting picked on by a pack of non-Whites. And, the non-Whites picked on the wrong White, like, at the wrong time, because a pack of Nazis just happened to be there and sort it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] it can happen. Yeah. No, like I said. Anyway, it’s quite obvious when someone is being targeted unfairly, is being stood over, is being bullied, that kind of thing.

 

36 NSN Promo Clip

top

 

Joel Davis: I’m getting a message from NSN HQ Beaming into my headset. Apparently a new hype edit just dropped. Haven’t even seen this edit. I’m gonna play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s watch it. Let’s watch and get a raw reaction to it.

 

Joel Davis: Let’s hit it!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Who makes those, bro? That’s fucking cool! If I was 19, 18, I would join straight away! I mean, put yourself in the position of a young guy growing up in the current conditions, societal conditions. You’re going to join that every time! Whoever sees that and who has any balls left at all is going to join. That’s good stuff. It’s good content.

 

37 On Why You Should Join the Org

top

 

Joel Davis: Imagine, imagine not joining us!

 

Like if you’re an Aussie, you’re a young White dude, even like a middle aged White dude. Join the fucking Org! Like, come on, like be a man, join the clan! You know, fucking hell, like what else are you going to do? What else are you doing? We’re all gonna die! You know, someone close to me died recently. It’s the first time a close member of my family has died so so far in my life and makes you reflect upon, just how quick and short life is and how you got to make it count because who knows, you get hit by a bus tomorrow, who knows?

 

But even if you have a full innings, it’s not that fucking long, you know, it blows, it goes quick and you gotta make it count! You gotta make sure that the time that you do have, you invest it in something worthwhile. And there’s been too many lives wasted amongst our people over recent decades. Too much nihilism, too much individualism in our people are just blowing through their lives on entertainment and trivial matters and you know, trying to make money and just shit that ultimately doesn’t really matter. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be trying to make money and have a successful career but you know, what really matters, what really matters obviously is your family and your nation legacy that you’re leaving behind, the people that you love and that you care about your people and that’s all that really fucking matters. Everything else is secondary.

 

So you know, join the fucking tribe that’s going to put up a resistance to the genocide of our people for fuck sake. Like whatever else that you’re doing is significantly less important.

 

And it’s fucking fine, like we have a fucking great time! So yeah, join the Org, White Australia.org. You can join as a supporter. But if you want to join as a member, get on Telegram, message White Ausbot. That’s WHITE AUSBOT at White Ausbot on Telegram and get vetted and join the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: I realised we just had an ad break, a really cool ad break. Like most streams you would get some gay product like you know, “men’s beard straighteners” or something like that! [chuckling] But in this one you get, we interrupt this stream to bring you exclusive new hype edit, Join the Nazi gang! [chuckling]

 

38 Succulent Chinese Meal – Democracy Manifest Guy

top

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah! By the way, did you see that thing that Tom posted on Telegram just before we went live here? He got a screenshot from everyone surely knows the:

 

“This is democracy manifest!”

 

You know, that guy, the very famous, he was eating a succulent Chinese meal in King’s Cross [Sydney’s old red light area]. I think this was back in the 90s. And he was arrested and it’s a viral clip. Maybe I should pull it up. Surely everyone’s seen that it’s such a famous meme! Such a famous meme. You know it Blair, surely?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like the guy getting carried out of the restaurant?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know the story behind that? The story behind that I, as I heard it is this guy was just travelling around Melbourne eating like really fancy restaurants. I mean, just walking out. So he was getting free dinners every night.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t him though.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wasn’t him?

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! So it was in Sydney. It was in King’s Cross in Sydney. And it was a case of mistaken identity.

 

There was a guy that was doing “dine and dashes” as they call them, and they got the wrong guy or they thought he was doing credit card fraud or something like that. And they come in, they arrest the wrong guy, and he has that hilarious reaction. And now it’s you know, it’s a goated meme. It’s funny how like 50% of Australian memes are some guy getting arrested or engaging with police in some way because we’re a convict colony. It’s like, …

 

[1:09:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny how they have the wrong guy. They have the wrong guy, but he still just gives them so much grief! And it’s a complete smart ass, just by Aussie instinct.

 

I mean, I thought he was the guilty one from the way he reacted, but he’s not. He’s just Australian. [chuckling] And that’s his reaction to authority trying to tell him what to do.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s awesome! It’s goated. It’s legendary. But Tom posted a screenshot from the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, rest in peace. I believe he passed away. He was 82, but he passed away, I think a couple years ago. But it says here:

 

“In 2023, true crime author Mark Dappin published a biography of Carlson, (so his last name was Carlson) titled ‘Carnage A Succulent Chinese Meal, Mr. Rent a Kill, and the Australian Manson Murders’ that explores his connections to other criminals. The book revealed that Carlson was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and Nazism. And then on at least one occasion he threw a party at his home to celebrate Hitler’s birthday!”

 

Jack Carlson was his name.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Wow, I didn’t know any of that. That’s really interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, pretty funny!

 

So the “Succulent Chinese Meal-Democracy Manifest Guy” was our guy! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: You can tell by the way he speaks that he’s a well read individual. You know, he’s quite articulate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, absolutely! I think he was like a Shakespearean actor. He would act in Shakespearean productions and stuff.

 

39 Blair Giving a Lift to a Stranger

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, it’s so interesting the lives people live and you wouldn’t know it. Like you walk pass people on the street.

 

For example, I was getting my car serviced recently and there was an old guy at the mechanic who was also leaving his car there and he had no way to get home, and he lived on the other side of town. So I said:

 

“I’ll take you home, mate, jump in.”

 

I was picking my car up actually, so it was when I was leaving, took him home and we were talking in the car for about 10 minutes. The guy did like 15 years in the Australian Navy, had been to like eight different countries and just had this incredible story, this life story that you wouldn’t have expected. Like he just seemed like some random old homeless guy [chuckling] from the way he was dressed.

 

But yeah, everyone’s got a really interesting set of experiences and if you just ask them the questions, you realise that there’s a lot of little individual worlds going on out there. So much knowledge, a wealth of knowledge. And if you just take an interest and god, I can’t give that advice enough to Zoomers! Zoomers don’t ask enough questions, man!

 

I mean, I love you guys, I love how fast paced you are, how quickly your minds tick over. But you have to ask more questions, right? There’s so much to learn from out there, so much knowledge to absorb.

 

40 More on the Musk-Trump Fallout

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah, let’s talk about the Trump and Elon fallout because it’s quite interesting. Apparently they have a meeting scheduled tomorrow to try and patch things up. So but it was quite interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you reckon it’s some kind of a stunt with an agenda behind it? Does it seem contrived to you?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think so. I think it’s a genuine falling out because Musk donated more, he was the biggest donor to Trump’s campaign. Not only did he donate heaps, but he also bought X and reformatted the whole site to make it more amenable to Trump’s election campaign, which it’s hard to quantify exactly what impact that had on the election, but it was only positive, whatever the impact was.

 

And obviously he got very close to Trump. He was on the campaign trail in the administration. Early days it seemed like every time Trump was doing a press conference Musk was there with him with his like kids and shit and you know, they seem like best buds all of a sudden. But then in recent months they seem to have drifted and Musk isn’t really getting what he wants. I saw he wasn’t happy with the tariffs. That obviously negatively affects his business interests. He was vocal about that. He’s, not happy with. Trump openly rejects the concept of global warming and backs coal and oil, and these traditional industries, even nuclear energy, but has a lot of contempt for so-called green energy programmes and rebates and subsidies and all that kind of stuff.

 

And so now they’re trying to get rid of those which would really negatively affect Tesla because the electronic vehicle rebates make them competitive in the marketplace in the United States. And the tariff regime is not good either way whether they make Teslas in America or outside America. Either they’re exporting out of America and paying a tariff or they’re bringing it into America and paying a tariff. It’s not good from his perspective.

 

And then also from the perspective of SpaceX I saw Trump say that Elon Musk proposed someone to be head of NASA and Trump knocked back because the guy was a Democrat or something is what he said. I don’t know much about it, but obviously Elon was trying to install his guy in NASA because he’s the number one contractor to the US government when it comes to basically rockets and you know, space faring technologies, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe Trump was worried that Elon was going to figure out that NASA is all bullshit! Just a way for the American government to divert funds into unknown endeavours. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they are launching a lot of space satillites.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think they give that much of a shit about space exploration. But I think NASA is mostly about building rocket tech and other technologies, imaging technologies, etcetera, in order to, create intercontinental weapons systems.

 

And obviously Trump is now pushing forward with trying to build, the Golden Dome to try and build new weapons tech that will potentially be able to neutralise the intercontinental ballistic missiles of their adversaries and neutralise their capacity to obliterate them with nuclear weapons through trying to intercept them mid flight and so on.

 

41 Musk and Big AI Contracts and Peter Thiel the Homosexual Billionaire

top

 

There’s also big AI contracts that were given out to Palantir, which is Peter Thiel’s company. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are old associates that go back a long way. Peter Thiel actually fucked Elon Musk over, back when Elon Musk was CEO of PayPal. Thiel did a hostile takeover and kind of took over PayPal from Elon Musk back in the early 2000s when he was on his wedding honeymoon, and fucked him over. So they’re old enemies of sorts.

 

And Peter Thiel is the homosexual billionaire who was also basically responsible for J.D. Vance’s political career. He basically funded him all the way up into the Vice Presidency, first into the Senate and then into the Vice Presidency. Very key power player in American politics.

 

And so it seems like he won out over Elon on the AI contract because obviously Elon Musk has been developing Grok under X in order to develop AI capacity. So Musk has lost out on quite a few counts. And he’s obviously upset about that for perhaps obvious reasons. But it’s like as I said on I said on Telegram, it really goes to show that even if you’re like the number one campaign donor to Trump, it doesn’t buy you that much.

 

42 Trump’s Relationship with the Jews, and the Epstein Case

top

 

And so it really, like, begs the question when it comes to Trump’s relationship with the jews, it seems like it’s more than just campaign financing. It’s almost like the jews have a deeper hold over him than just that, a deeper connection with him than just that. And the campaign financing is secondary. It’s just that he’s their guy, so they give him money to help him get elected.

 

But, you know, it indicates that he’s not just doing the bidding of Israel because they threw a few hundred million at him in his political campaign. But there’s something deeper.

 

And of course, Elon Musk came out today and he’s throwing shit at Trump, accusing him of being in the Epstein files, and that’s why they haven’t been released. And was sharing videos of Trump, you know, chumming up with Epstein back in the day and dancing with him at a party and talking to him about all these girls that he was gonna bang at this party. Or whatever. And strongly implying that Trump was somehow involved in the whole Epstein Island thing. And I don’t know if that’s true or not, but there definitely is nefarious connections there of some sort between him and Epstein because they were associates.

 

But also there’s pictures of [chuckling] Elon Musk with what’s her name? Ghislaine Maxwell as well. So it’s not like Elon Musk has no connection to these people. So anyway, shit is being thrown in either direction. It’s pretty interesting to see a fallout like this.

 

43 On Trump’s Charisma

top

 

And I think that if they don’t patch it up, I think Musk comes off worse than Trump. Like, Musk, you know, came up with the big guns, trying to de-legitimize Trump. But the thing is, Trump supporters are so fucking loyal. Like, Trump has been screwing them over for like a decade, giving them basically nothing that he promised almost for a decade, and they are as loyal as fuck! Because the thing is that Trump has rizz. Trump is the most memeable human being on earth alive today. Like, he’s got incredible charisma, he’s funny, he’s likeable! Elon Musk, however, is not likeable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just wanted to add in addition to him being charismatic, the guy, I don’t know whether this is deliberate or not, but slotting himself into little, like, TV show cameos, classic American film, like when he appears in Home Alone inside that hotel and speaks to Macaulay Culkin, stuff like that really embedded him into American culture! It really made him a folk hero of the people of America. All of that is great PR. It’s almost like a long term strategy to becoming president later in life. It’s like it’s all worked to his advantage.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But like, you can’t deny that there’s just so many incredible moments from Trump. Like, there’s no end to it. Like when he almost got shot. It was awesome!

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s cool!

 

[1:19:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: When he got arrested, the mug shot he did was just goated. The time when he came out of the plane and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just died and he was like:

 

“I did not know that! You’re telling me for the first time!”

 

Like, I could go on for like an hour talking about meme-able moments from Trump. Like, it just never ends. Americans love him because they identify with him. He’s kind of like, “that’s my president!” It’s almost like he’s like an avatar of patriotism in America, for better or worse. Right?

 

44 Trump’s Leverage over Musk

top

 

Elon Musk isn’t even really American, doesn’t even have an American accent. He wasn’t born in America. He doesn’t have that kind of loyalty from the people. And he’s kind of like awkward nerd, and so doesn’t have that kind of loyalty. But also, Elon Musk doesn’t have the leverage. Elon Musk companies, SpaceX, Tesla, they’re dependent upon government subsidies and contracts which Trump can control. And Trump came out and said:

 

“You know what, maybe one way that we could cut all the wasteful government spending that Elon has a problem with is to cut all of the subsidies and government contracts that Elon Musk has. Maybe that would be like the first thing to do. I don’t know why Biden didn’t do that.”

 

And so he’s basically threatening to just take an axe to his fortune. And Trump has the leverage to do that if he wanted to.

 

SpaceX is, they’re saying, has lost like half of its value in one day because of Elon’s antics today. And you know, there’s an argument I saw Steve Bannon come out and say that the Trump administration should just like, seize SpaceX as a national security asset off Musk entirely. And which it could if it wanted to. It has the ability to do that. I’m not saying that it’s going to do that. Trump is notoriously kind of moderate. He doesn’t punish his political enemies anywhere near hard enough. And he’s had that tendency for a long time. I wouldn’t expect it to change here. Probably wouldn’t go after Musk too hard. But he’s holding up the cards.

 

Whereas, like, what cards does Musk really have? Like, if Musk threatened to go and say:

 

“Oh, I’m going to go sell rockets to the Chinese instead of you!”

 

They’re just going to take SpaceX off him. If Trump doesn’t want to subsidise his Teslas, eat shit! What is he going to do about it?

 

45 Musk as a Capitalist, a Merchant and a Con Man

top

 

He can’t go to the Democrats and try and like, support the Democrats. They all hate him now. Like, he’s completely burned that bridge because over the last year or two, Musk has said more radical things than Trump has ever said about White genocide and issues facing White People. And I didn’t support Musk because he’s also gone against us on key issues. Like, I remember over Christmas and New Year he went against us on the whole H1B Visa thing. Apparently White people don’t work hard enough when they need to mass import Indians into America to prop up the tech industry. Which just goes to show how Musk is a fraud, doesn’t really believe in anything seemingly. And he just kind of cares about his bottom line, ultimately. For all the ideological bravado and idealism that he presents when he goes on the Joe Rogan podcast or something, it seems like he’s at the end of the day, he’s a fucking capitalist, he’s a merchant and he’s a con man. He kind of acts like he’s like a libertarian who’s against excess government spending and all this kind of stuff, yet he’s like the biggest net beneficiary of government handouts in America.

 

So I think people have a lot less patience for him than for Trump, and Trump has the leverage. So if Musk doesn’t cuck to Trump and doubles down, I could see this being like a death spiral for Elon Musk potentially, which I’d love to see because number one, it’d be funny. And number two, a punished Elon Musk. He could end up doing interesting stuff that destabilises politics in a way that opens up opportunities perhaps for us. You know, it’s its kind of like a wild card. Like the world’s richest man also pissed off at the government with like no political allies. What does he do next? Probably something interesting.

 

So hopefully they don’t patch it up tomorrow and we just like see this feud like exacerbate because it would be it’d be interesting at the very least, but it could potentially result in more free speech on X rather than less, or something where he goes off the reservation. I don’t know, tries to win, win us back somehow by playing to us more.

 

46 Blair Thinks Musk Will Patch Things up with Trump

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe finally my like mid takes that aren’t even that extreme, me and those takes will be allowed back on X. Like out of everyone that got censored, you got to admit, censoring me was one of the most unfair moves.

 

I mean, I try to play by the rules, I try to be the nice guy, but as I’ve said previously in politics, like being the nice guy doesn’t really get you anywhere. Sometimes you got to be the bad guy.

 

But I think they’ll patch it up, man! I think they’ll come to some sort of agreement, because especially in. By what you’ve just described it’s in Musk’s interests to really try to get somewhere with this. Right. It’s not really wise for him to be in Trump’s bad books. But it also goes to show that a lot of the time, political donors don’t have as much power as a lot of people think they do they probably have a lot more power in Australia, [chuckling] but in America, maybe not so much. A lot of the time the people they’re backing can turn on them for various reasons because politics is a bit unpredictable like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it goes to show that maybe it’s like the Mossad getting you on video banging underage people or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: Capturing your children and marrying your children into their bloodlines and things like that are probably more significant than just who writes the checks, like, on some level.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they figured that out eventually, didn’t they? Like, foreign intelligence agencies would have figured out that eventually that money on its own just isn’t enough. They need more leverage over these personalities in countries of interest. But whenever there’s a big split or disagreement between two powerful characters in a country of interest, then it’s a good opportunity for subversives to sort of jump onto the scene as well. And it may, in some cases be the result of the work of subversives. So there’s that to take into consideration for Trump and Musk.

 

[1:25:43]

 

47 Trump’s ‘Big Dog’ Style of Treating Opponents

top

Joel Davis: I hope that their egos get the better of them. Because one thing you notice about Trump is when he has leverage over someone, he flexes on them. Like, I remember when he was kind of staunching in the first administration, he was staunching Kim Jong Un, and he was calling him Little Rocket Man, and he was like:

 

“You’ve got little rockets, I’ve got big rockets. You know don’t fuck with me. Like, if you want to test them out, we’ll send out big rockets and blow up your little rockets!”

 

And then Kim Jong Un ended up inviting him to North Korea, and Trump is standing in the demilitarised zone in Korea, and he was doing the little bunny ears behind Kim Jong Un for all the cameras, just kind of ridiculing him.

 

Or like, when he had Zelensky in the White House, you know, he Was big dogging him in front of the cameras. Trump big dogs world leaders, all the time. He kind of stands over them and he shakes their hand all aggressive and like, pulls them in. He’s got this kind of like natural kind of like dominance aura that he uses to, obviously his advantage. He is successful in politics and business for a reason. He knows how to put himself about. And he’s a great shit talker. He’s always shit talking all of his fucking rivals.

 

Elon’s gone pretty scorched earth here! Elon’s going on Twitter and is accusing him of being a fucking paedophile! He’s going hard! Like, it’s not just like saying you disagree over this or that government policy. Like, he’s going full scorched earth, saying he wants to fund a new political party that can take on the Republicans. And like he retweeted Ian Miles Chong saying:

 

“Trump should be impeached for being on Epstein’s island and J.D. Vance should become president.”

 

And all this kind of shit! So he’s going pretty hard.

 

48 Trump’s Appeal to Conspiratorial Paranoia

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of these relationships in politics, even amongst the world’s most powerful people are so fragile. What I was going to say is Trump is relentless. He knows how to appeal to the conspiratorial paranoia. Maybe it’s not paranoia, maybe it’s on point, but just the conspiratorial nature of a lot of his supporters. Like when he mentioned Elon’s black eye and before he was going on some show, he offered him some makeup to cover it up. And Elon didn’t want the makeup, which he thought was interesting. We all know what he’s insinuating there. There’s some weird theory about all of these celebrities that are in some sort of club and at one point they’ve all had black eyes, which may be part of some sort of ritual or initiation process. I don’t know. But maybe Trump doesn’t know either.

 

But the fact that he knows how to appeal to that strong nature of a lot of the people that support him, that’s interesting that he’ll, …

 

49 Trump is a High Level Freemason and is Supported by the Deep State

top

 

Joel Davis: Trump is a high level Freemason. He knows the score. Yeah, he knows what’s happening. He’s in charge for a reason. People were saying:

 

“Oh, Joel! (idiots online) Oh, Joel! If the Deep State has been against Trump for years, if he really went to Epstein’s island, they would have released it!”

 

The Deep State are totally fine with Trump being the fucking President of the United States. You think he’d be able to just waltz into the presidency if the Deep State had an issue? Like, if you’re in my Telegram chat, how are you still operating on this Qtard, like surface level understanding, like, Trump is fucking part of the Deep State! He’s chosen by the Deep State, you fucking idiots!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, well, why did they attack him, Joel? Why did they go so crazy attacking him during his first presidency then? How do you explain that? You know what it is? This is my take.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

50 Blair’s View of Trump and the Deep State

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes when you, as a subversive, when you’re into psych warfare, when you’re trying to create a fifth column, sleeper agents, you’re funding them, you’re setting them up. Sometimes when you breed a mad attack dog which has a lot of little weird attack dog puppies, those attack dogs can kind of run loose and it’s hard to get control of them. That’s what I think happened in America with that whole situation. I think there’s wild attack dogs that were just on the loose [chuckling] and it’s been hard to clean up the mess that they’ve made. That’s what I think that whole nonsense was.

 

Joel Davis: Think about it. They didn’t want Trump to win in 2020. They’re dropping Covid pandemics, which had other purposes other than that, obviously. They’re dropping BLM riots, they’re burning down the cities of America. They’re completely rigging the election. They’re launching crazy psyops. Right? This time they just stood down and let him win.

 

So obviously he was allowed to win! Obviously, they wanted him to win this time because things have changed. There’s a shift in strategy and there’s a recognition that he’s the guy for, …

 

51 Why Trump was Put Back In

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be that they realised that it was inevitable that he would win, that., …

 

Joel Davis: No! It wasn’t inevitable! They could easily have just rigged it again. They actually undermined Biden too, and took him out before the election was even going to happen.

 

Blair Cottrell: I disagree. I disagree. I think they need to maintain, at least ostensibly, some semblance of legitimacy. They can’t just keep rigging every election, obviously. Right?

 

[1:31:02]

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t though. I’m not saying this election was rigged, but what I’m saying is that they stood down, they didn’t obstruct him from winning this time because Israel got attacked. Biden wasn’t doing enough to protect Israel and the Democrats weren’t. Because the rise of China, issues with Russia. The American foreign policy was not working under the old paradigm. And there was a recognition that they needed to switch to a more realist framework that Trump was providing. Trump was going to provide the leadership that was going to bring people., … No one was signing up to the military anymore. We’re veering towards a potential World War III scenario, but no one wants to join the military. Need to wind the woke back, need to get Americans, you know, back behind their government, back behind their president, back into the military. Trump was just gloating today in a press conference with the German Chancellor Merz. They’re saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the 80th anniversary of D-Day.”

 

Or whatever. And he’s like:

 

“That wasn’t a good day for you, was it?”

 

And then Merz was like:

 

“No, well, no, it was a great day for us because you saved us from the Nazi dictatorship!”

 

And Trump’s like:

 

“Oh, yeah, of course!”

 

But Trump was saying you know, that the Germans need to do what he’s done to replenish their military, that no one wants to fight for Germany right now because they don’t have any spirit. He’s like:

 

“What we have done, we’re recruiting like crazy right now because we’ve brought the spirit back.”

 

And that’s obviously, the spirit comes, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the spirit comes back to the Germans?

 

Joel Davis: There’s a recognition in the American Deep State that you need to have Trump running it to get the goys back on the team! White men are not playing for the team anymore. And they can’t run a global empire without the White guys running the companies running the military and so on. Rank and file. White men are the foundation of American power. And if you alienate them, America is no longer able to run the world. That’s why he was allowed to win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. But there’s people that play all sides, obviously, and if they predict or are able to understand that somebody’s rise is inevitable and can no longer be sort of, the floodgates have to come down and something needs to be allowed to happen, then it’s going to happen on their terms. Still, it’s a mistake to believe that there are sort of world players controlling literally everything in politics. Like, politics is a bit of a chaotic place and, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but this is national power plays in American politics. Like you could see before Israel was attacked on, was it October 7, 2023, Trump was behind Biden in the polls and was basically consistently behind Biden in all the polls for three years. Then as soon as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember the polls before the 2016 Trump election? Was it 2015 or 2016? 2016, wasn’t it? The polls had Hillary at like 90% one week before the election.

 

52 The Role of October 7 and Trump

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, because they miscalculated. But the thing is, the polls were accurate this time. And the polls were accurate this time. And what it showed was that basically after October 7th, then all of a sudden the media, the jewish media, start attacking Biden. Rather than covering Biden’s arse for being fucking, basically off with the fairies and senile, they stopped covering his arse and they started exposing him to scrutiny, because Biden wasn’t playing ball for Netanyahu in Israel. It was very clear to see. And then Trump started getting boosted.

 

They had Trump by the balls. They had him in court over so many different court cases, it was looking like they were going to throw him in prison. So he couldn’t even, I mean he could still run from prison technically, but he’s probably not going to win the presidency from a prison cell. They had Trump by the balls, and then all of a sudden Supreme Court decision bails him out! This is after October 7th and then boom! Like Trump comes back and you know, Elon Musk buys Twitter, gets behind him, all the big jew donors get behind him, hundreds of millions get dropped behind him and then it looks like Trump is inevitable and then everyone goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, Trump was always going to win!”

 

But no, I was following this for years. It looked like there’s no, Trump might have been the Republican nominee, it looked like Trump was going to be thrown in prison.

 

So they had Trump fucked and then they let him off. They let him win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, I trust your judgement because I know that you follow American politics a lot more closely than I do. The awkward situation now though, it seems for America, but for the world, or especially probably starting with America as a balancing act that needs to be struck with American culture where some sort of re-nationalised spirit, as you put it, needs to be helped to resurface without the country becoming ethnically nationalist at the same time. Which I think is its easy to do that in America, isn’t it? Because America is so multi-ethnic, whereas it’s not so easy to do in other countries. And that’s the balancing act that I suppose the Trump administration is going to try to strike for various reasons. Obviously they need to recruit more soldiers, police, etc. So interesting to see how that pans out.

 

[1:35:58]

 

53 Taking the Boot off the Neck of Whites

top

 

Joel Davis: They’re obviously taking the boot off the neck of Whites and they’re throwing bones to Whites at the moment. The political elements that are more conservative, the obstructions have been taken out of their ways obviously, like Leftists are still against them for ideological reasons. But the dirty tricks that were being played before stop being played. They got out of the way. The key power players.

 

And then you start seeing Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, these guys were funding Biden and funding the election security efforts and so on in 2020 and all that kind of thing, censoring Trump off all their platforms and so on. They’re all at the inauguration, they’re all shaking hands with Trump this time. There was a total sea change in the attitude of these elites. And there’s a reason for that. It doesn’t just happen because “the people” decided that they wanted him to be president. The people didn’t really change their perspective at all! It was the elites that changed their perspective, from my stance. But yeah, anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

 

54 Joel Will Be on with Thomas777 Re Philosophical Anti-Semitism, etc.

top

 

I see people saying:

 

“For real though, Joel is rocking the Thomas777 look!”

 

Well, actually I was just talking to Thomas earlier. I think Monday night Australian time, Monday morning American time. We’re going to do a, another collab. We’re going to talk about philosophical anti-semitism. We’re going to talk about Martin Heidegger. We’re going to get into the weeds of political philosophy and you know, NS philosophy and its precursors and so on. So it should be interesting stream for those who are looking for something a little bit intellectual. But our way inclined. Thomas is always an enjoyable collaborator. I’ve done a lot of podcasts with him over the years. He’s a good friend. So I’ll put up a link for that when the time comes. But yeah, like I said, Monday night, I think Monday morning America time.

 

People are saying that you were trying to speak but you’re muted.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just realised that before. But that’s okay. I was just saying that it’s curious. Oh, it’s not really curious. It doesn’t even, it doesn’t need to be said. It’s fine. That’s why I didn’t even pick up on it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. I was looking at at something else. I wasn’t looking at the screen. Is there another, any other subjects for us to cover?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t think so. I’ve had a busy week so I only got a couple of days to actually spend or maybe a day and a half where I actually had time enough to post to my social media this week. But I’m going to look at spending a bit more time making some more clip content and putting some more stuff out there. So I’m looking forward to that.

 

But I think we, what do we do? We did the NSN banner drop at Northland Shopping Centre. We did the speculation around that, or not speculation, just discussion around the response. Then we did Elon versus Trump. What else has happened the last week? Is there anything else?

 

55 Thomas Sewell on the Ex-UFC Fighter Jake Shields Show

top

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think of any like huge stories. I see Anthony Scalise saying:

 

“Joel, any information on the Jake Shields collab?”

 

Yeah, Tom recorded a podcast with Jake Shields on the Jake Shields Show this week. I don’t know exactly when that is going to be released but I think soon. So obviously it’s already been recorded. So that’s an interesting one.

 

Obviously I’ve been on Jake’s podcast before. He’s a friend. And yeah it’s great, it’s great that he’s has platform Ed not only me, but Tom as well. That he’s platforming Australian nationalists. You know, ex-UFC fighter. No, he’s not a Nazi. He’s not as radical as us, but he’s at least open to like hearing our perspective and platforming our perspective. And you know he’s always very critical of jewish power and he’s sympathetic towards pro-White politics. So you know, it’s nice to have a platform like that to break the siege. Obviously we’re under censorship, pretty heavy censorship. Tom and I and you, some of the most censored people in the world. Like we’re censored from fucking everything!

 

56 Still Banned from X Jew to Oz Government Pressure

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So yeah, that’s what I was going to say. It’s like, I hope that Tom took the opportunity to try to put the message out there. And, I don’t know, maybe Jake can help put pressure on the right people to get us back on X. Because it sucks not being on X! It sucks not being part of the conversation around the world. You know, Telegram these days, Telegram was pretty big during Covid I remember a lot of people came to Telegram to get their news during the Covid era, the lockdowns and all that shit! But these days, everyone’s kind of moved on from Telegram. There’s still the kind of little small loyalist following that I have on there, but it’s just not the reach is nowhere near what it would be if we could get on X as well.

 

And as I just mentioned earlier, it’s a really unfair ban, I think. I mean, you look at the kind of stuff that’s posted on X, and especially the content I was putting out there, it wasn’t even that bad. It’s obviously like part of some contrived effort or pressure.

 

Joel Davis: The Australian government requested that we be banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t have any evidence of that, but it looks that way. It’s kind of obvious that that’s what happened because we all got taken down at the same time. All our appeals got ignored! We haven’t even had a single. I haven’t had a single reply. Have you had a reply from X staff?

 

Joel Davis: No! Usually when you get banned, they send you an email saying you’ve been banned. I didn’t even get that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct! I didn’t get that either. And I haven’t had a single, I’ve appealed a few times, haven’t had a single reply. They’re just like, fuck you! It’s like, what do I actually even do to get banned? Bullshit!

 

We were in the gym, Joel and I, just having a conversation, and some young guys overheard our conversation and they approached us and said:

 

“Hey, do you guys have social media? Where can we find you guys?”

 

And we had to tell them:

 

“Well, we’re kind of banned off everything. We have Rumble.”

 

They didn’t even know what Rumble was. And they said:

 

“Are you on X?”

 

And we said:

 

“No, we’re banned off X.”

 

And they laughed and said:

 

“How did you get banned off X?”

 

And I realised that to the standard person, X just seems to be a place where you can say whatever you want. So they’re like:

 

“Wow, what the hell did you post to get banned off X?”

 

They assume that you’ve posted something really bad, like gore or hectic shit that no one would want to see! But it wasn’t that. It was just because we are dissidents in Australia. It’s because the Australian government requested to X that we were banned. And it’s like, it made me realise how kind of like forced into the corner we are down here in Australia.

 

57 The Censorship is Preventing Them from Being a Sought After Voice in Oz

top

 

And what’s most frustrating I reckon. I don’t know if this is like big noting myself, but I could say the same for Joel, I think. If it wasn’t for all the censorship, I’m quite confident that I would still be one of the most sought after voices for just general commentary in this country. Because the following I had before I was banned was massive! I used to get the same reach as Channel 9, 7 and 10 put together on Facebook, at least, when I was allowed to use Facebook back in the day. And I would have only grown from there. I get banned and then Avi Yemeni kind of takes my place and all the former audience I used to have just watch him because there’s no one else to watch anymore.

 

That’s the problem with censorship. Like, you get kind of like taken off the table or off the stage, screen, whatever, and some like bullshit jewish Israel shill takes your place and just talks some shit and sort of spells the audience and misleads them, takes their money for all sorts of nefarious purposes:

 

“Guys, I’m in the back of a police car. You need to donate to my legal fund right now!”

 

You know, it’s like the results of the censorship have been dreadful! And it works, doesn’t it? Censorship? It really does.

 

[1:43:51]

 

 

58 Avi Yemeni Scamming His Supporters

top

 

Joel Davis: How is he getting thrown? How’s he getting arrested? They don’t even take his phone off him. Like, get fucking! That’s obviously, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You know what they did? I know this too. Like, I heard about this. I wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true too. That video, I think it was a few years ago where Avi Yemeni claimed he had been arrested unfairly because he was just trying to report on something. It might have been a lockdown rally or something. He was in the back of a police car instantly demanding money for a legal fund because the police had arrested him. They literally just drove him down the street and just dropped him up the next suburb. They didn’t even really arrest him, they just took him down the road. And everyone who donated just got fleeced! Just got fucking scammed! And that’s so sad, man, that people are trying to do the right thing. They’re believing in something, they want to support someone who they believe is representing them. And that’s what happens. You just get some jewish Israel shill taking your money and laughing at you. That’s what Avi does. He takes people’s money and he laughs at them. So it’s a shame, but that’s the kind of that censorship has facilitated.

 

59 Despite Censorship Our Recognition in the Public is Growing

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I mean, even despite the censorship, we still go insanely viral all the time. Like, I was talking to some family members of mine, I won’t say who, younger guys the other day, and one of them was like:

 

“Oh, Joel. All the kids at school were like, watching this video and then they were showing it to me and it was you talking about Hitler! And I was like, ‘that’s my cousin!’.”

 

And then my other cousin goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s like I saw this other video of you talking about Hitler on TikTok the other day. It had like millions of likes.”

 

I was like:

 

“Okay, I don’t even know what video that is.”

 

But, I mean, that’s pretty funny. Like I hear people say that all the time. They saw me on Instagram, they saw me on TikTok. I don’t even have accounts on these platforms. It’s just other people reposting it.

 

So obviously, even despite the censorship that we have, by being organically interesting we’re still known out there. Every time I go out in Sydney or Melbourne, if I go out to the city for a drink or something, at least one person comes up to me and recognises me and says:

 

“Oh, hey, it’s great to meet you. Keep doing what you’re doing, if not more.”

 

We’ve become infamous in Australia, or maybe famous, you could say, even in Australia, despite everything, despite how we’ve been treated.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I know that you like to look at the glass half full, which is what you’re doing now, but I realised you are right, now that I think about it. When I said censorship works, it works at first! It works to sort of not nullify, but significantly reduce your reach, but only for a year or two. And then gradually, if you’re consistent and if you try to find every way around the censorship possible. Yeah, you do you become more infamous. You become even more sought after, I think.

 

And the longer and more aggressively you’re censored, the more consistent you are in response to that, the more infamous you can potentially become. So it’s kind of like that real cliche saying that tyranny actually just feeds tyrants and censorship is a form of modern tyranny, which in the long run actually just feeds more people into our audience basket.

 

[1:47:25]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think so. I think if we had no censorship we’d have a much bigger viewership.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously it’d just grow faster. It just grow more organically. Right? But think of it like this. Think of it like a weed. I’m not saying that we’re like a weed, but that’s how the government views us. And they’re spraying us with poison. That’s what censorship is. And it, like, prevents us from growing, but it doesn’t kill us. We actually just start adapting to the poison and then they have to spray us with a lot more poison to get the same effect that they got previously. Then that poison doesn’t work. So they’ve got to go for some higher grade shit!

 

But all that’s actually happening is we’re adapting. We’re being forced to adapt the organism that we are to the circumstances imposed on us. That’s what censorship kind of forces you to do. I suppose.

 

60 Surviving the Censorship Because What We Have to Say is So Interesting

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I mean, the only reason that we’re able to get around, like, pretty much no one would be able to survive this level of censorship. The only reason that we can is because we’re just that interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: And also very autistic. So we don’t really feel emotionally crushed by it. You know, it’s kind of like:

 

“Oh we got censored again. Okay.”

 

It’s like, [chuckling] you don’t really get disheartened by it, right?

 

61 Censorship Does Make It Hard to Recruit People Because They Don’t Know How to Join

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think it’s more that we’re so motivated by our cause that we’re not going to stop.

 

But yeah, the main effect of censorship is actually this. Actually we managed to get out there and still be known and get talking points out there, get attention. But what’s difficult is recruiting people to our organisation because people will see a clip, people will see a news broadcast, they’ll see us, they’ll be aware that we exist. But they won’t really know:

 

“Okay, how do I go and like, join these guys or find out more?”

 

And if they go to look online to try and find out more, it’s hard to actually find the details. So that’s the main difficulty.

 

62 the System is Afraid of Us Recruiting Thousands of Men

top

 

It’s that it’s actually preventing us from recruiting effectively and that’s obviously why they do it, because what they’re really afraid of, it’s not just us being popular, people watching our videos. What they’re really afraid of is us building a movement of thousands and thousands of men. That’s what they’re petrified of!

 

And so that’s what their efforts are all about. Whether it be the way, how heavily we’re policed to try and intimidate people out of getting involved in the movement whether it be the way they go after people try and like take away their livelihoods. Censorship, all of it centres around trying to create obstacles for us to recruit people where the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s truek.

 

Joel Davis: Making as difficult as possible to get a bunch of nationalists in the same room or the same place together.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s part of the government’s counter extremist efforts, which are, I’ve said previously, are just repurposed counterinsurgency.

 

The point is to prevent you from appealing to the public and then especially from recruiting from the public, or for recruiting from the public.

 

So what happens is if you’re a dissident, one that can potentially threaten the current regime, you get classed as an “extremist” and then you’re susceptible or targeted by counter extremist measures which include censorship, harassment ostracism from society, losing bank account, blah, blah, blah, the list goes on and on.

 

But as I’ve said, that’s not actually legal to do that in a democracy.

 

So eventually names, identities of people who are responsible for actually directing certain government agencies or setting up and being involved in government agencies that are doing that to Australian citizens, that are classifying them as extremists, basically stripping all their rights away and then just harassing and bullying them, preventing them from participating in society on a normal level. Eventually those people will be brought to justice.

 

63 Communists and Other Anti-Racist Activists Have Embedded Themselves Within Our Key Institutions

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And that’s the thing, that’s what Australians don’t realise. There are communists and other anti-racist activists that have embedded themselves within our key institutions, not just at the academic level but at the policing level. And they’re engaging in political policing under the auspices of so-called “Counter Terrorism” measures. We’re not terrorists by any definition of that term. And even the head of ASIO has agreed with this multiple times under Senate scrutiny that we’re not terrorists and we can’t be classified as terrorists, we don’t engage in terroristic activity.

 

But then they go:

 

“But oh, you’re extremist!”

 

What is an extremist? I saw an old interview, actually, of you and Tom from way back in the day, Blair, on a Current Affair, talking about African crime actually, I think it was from like 2019 or something. And they accused you of being an extremist. And what Tom said was that:

 

“An extremist is just someone who takes an idea to its logical conclusion.”

 

And that’s literally all it is. It’s just taking an idea that seriously that you 100% believe in it, rather than being like these politicians who claim to have a whole set of different ideals but don’t take them to their logical conclusion, either because they don’t have the ideals, or because if you actually took them to their logical conclusion there’ll be very bad ideals. Like when it comes to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But it depends on what the logical conclusion is, though.

 

[1:52:40]

 

64 Because We Have Ideals They Call That “Extremism”

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But if you take Leftism to its logical conclusion, it would result in basically exterminating White people, like in a very aggressive way.

 

And if you took our ideas to their logical conclusion, it would basically restore Australia to being a great country, across every metric and make your life, if you’re a normal White person, so much better than it is right now. But that’s what we’re guilty of we’re just guilty of actually having ideals and they call that “extremism”.

 

So basically what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to make it illegal essentially for you to have Right-wing ideals, for you to take the ideals of nationalism to the logical conclusion. Now they don’t have Left-wing extremism. Even though there’s Left-wingers that are engaging in political violence on a frequent basis, who harbour genocidal hatred. They’re allowed to take their ideas to their logical conclusion. So it’s a complete double standard! It’s a totally arbitrary standard applied ideologically just to be persecute the ideological enemies of the regime, of the current ruling class. An ideology which the majority of Australians don’t subscribe to and are actually offended by. But nevertheless because they control the levers of power and because of mass apathy and a mixture of apathy and demoralisation and disorganisation, they’re able to get away with it for now.

 

65 the System Calling Us “Extremists” to Justify Their Own Lawfare and Extremism Against Us

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s why they come up with certain arbitrary terms in order to justify the sort of action that they take against dissidents such as extremists. Because lawfully extremist doesn’t mean the same as terrorists, does it? They know we’re not terrorists! They know I’m not a terrorist. They know you’re not a terrorist, as you said. The head of ASIO has publicly stated that these guys aren’t terrorists due to Senate inquiries or whatever the hell is going on there.

 

But they still need to try to justify the sort of measures that they take in order to prevent us from appealing or recruiting from the public. Appealing to or recruiting from the public, which, as I said is the whole point of counterinsurgency. So any sort of language, any sort of phraseology they can come up with to justify extreme censorship ostracism, bullying, bully tactics lawfare, all the sorts of stuff that we’ve experienced.

 

66 Blair Barred from a Tafe Course Because Minorities Might Be “Unsafe”

top

 

Like, I can’t even go to a school. I think I went to a TAFE to try to do a Cert 4. You know what happened? The course leader, after about four weeks, told me that:

 

“I had to withdraw from the course because my identity had been discovered and minority students in the classroom may be exposed to an unsafe learning environment.”

 

It’s [chuckling] like just because my name’s Blair Cottrell! That’s why I’m not allowed to go to a TAFE in Australia right now, in democracy. And they know that I’m not going to hurt anyone. They know that I don’t have a history of that kind of thing in politics. But that’s not what’s important. What’s important is how they can come up with the sort of language and phraseology to justify pushing me out of society! To make sure that I never appeal to anyone! Because my ideas are dangerous for the current system. The way the system is currently set up.

 

But yeah, it’s a system that needs to change.

 

67 Superchats

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, while you fix that microphone [Blair bumped it], I think we’ll get into the Superchats. You can send a Superchat on Rumble. I don’t think you can send them on Odysee anymore. You can send them only on Rumble or on EntropyStream dot Live slash Joel Davis.

 

Anyway, we’ve got a few here already. One from Calmius saying:

 

“Blair, what’s the story of your beanie?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It was given to me by someone I knew quite a while ago. I don’t know if it was handmade. I can’t remember. But it’s so absurd that I tend not to wear it in public. This is something that I put on, … Can you guys hear me? Okay? I had to plug my microphone back In. I knocked it off the stand. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Same as before. I don’t know if it’s been picked up. Yeah.

 

But yeah, there’s not a great story behind it. It’s just an orange beanie with. What do you call this? Do you call that a pom. A pom pom? [chuckling] I don’t know what that is.

 

Yeah. But I just, I’ve stopped caring so much about how I look and so I don’t really care. I’m just wearing it because it was cold tonight. I don’t know what you want me to say. It’s just a beanie, bro.

 

Joel Davis: It’s all that deep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Rygo Weber said:

 

“Once again, great show guys. What do you think about the Trump and Elon spat?”

 

Well, we already got into that. So you don’t really need to answer it again. If you watch the show, we discussed it for like 20 minutes. Comfy Friend said:

 

“Great show!”

 

And shout out to Comfy Friend broadcasting the show on his X. Much appreciated. Zero seven to all the Comfy Friend viewers this evening. Of course the show’s on Rumble. It’s on Odysee and back on X for now.

 

So thanks for that man. I appreciate it. He does a good job shilling our shit collectively on X with all of us banned.

 

So you can follow Comfy Friend on X to still get your dose of NSN. Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell, Tom Sewell content. Jacob Hersant content as well:

 

“You will never have children!”

 

Spiteful mutant supporter said:

 

“Capitalism has made it this way. Old fashioned fascism will take it away.”

 

68 Superchat – Left Wing and Right Wing Views on Capitalism

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I always get a little bit awkward when someone just blames everything on capitalism. It seems like an oversimplification to me. What do you think, Joel?

 

[1:58:50]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah, but it’s definitely a dynamic. I mean but there’s a distinction between I think like a Left-wing and a Right-wing criticism of capitalism. So generally Left-wing criticisms of capitalism have to do with exploitation. This idea that, oh there’s all these fat cats that are making all this money at the expense of everyone. And basically the implication is that if we could just somehow like divide up the benefits more equitably that it would be okay.

 

Obviously there’s other Left-wing critiques, like you know, the idea that commodification is culturally destructive or environmentally destructive, but that they would share with like Right-wing critiques of capitalism.

 

But, a more Right-wing critique of capitalism would be double pronged. One that capitalism as a structure elevates the wrong kind of people into political leadership. So under like a feudal society where you had like an aristocracy, the selection pressures on leaders were different and we had basically warriors, men who fought with honour who passed down their titles intergenerationally and raised their children through good breeding but also through good rearing to become, to develop a kind of honour based, you know, moral code and to rule with an honour based, you know, warrior code. And therefore that created a more virtuous society.

 

Where under capitalism you have all these merchants that simply gain political power because they made a lot of money. And the attributes that make you successful in business don’t necessarily make you an honourable man and therefore you don’t have an honourable government. That’s like a Right-wing critique of capitalism.

 

Or another Right-wing critique of capitalism would be that the process of commercialisation is destructive to folkways, to culture. That when everything becomes commodified and you have this kind of global marketplace that it breaks down the local traditions and forms of identity and globalises and abstracts everything out into this like universal, into like universal individual units. And we basically lose all connection with who we really are. And as a result our moral and cultural fabric like disintegrates. I think I agree with these criticisms. And that doesn’t mean that we should, become communists, obviously! There’s a false dichotomy between capitalist and communist.

 

The alternative is not necessarily to abolish money or abolish property or something. That’s not the issue. The issue with capitalism is in that some people are rich and some people are poor. The issue are these other things. It’s about how do you create a political system that basically ensures that virtuous honourable men maintain leadership and rule and hold other elements to account that everything doesn’t get relativised in terms of “what’s good for business”. And secondarily, how do you preserve the culture of your people from being liquidated into this global marketplace? How do you stop commodification and preserve some kind of sacredness and tradition?

 

And obviously National Socialism, political ideology tries to do this,

 

69 Francis Yockey’s Description of Socialism Versus Capitalism in His Book Imperium

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Mandatory military service. You can start with that. And no one holds office without having done their military service and have achieved a certain rank perhaps. I reckon that’s a good start.

 

But I like Francis Yockey’s description of socialism versus capitalism in his book Imperium, where he basically insinuates that capitalism represents one aspect of human nature and so it’s impossible to actually eliminate it because it represents the selfish motivation which is half the reason anyone ever does anything. If you make it so people can’t actually advance their own interests, then you kill the incentive to actually do anything. Because no one wants to do anything if it’s purely just in the interests of the community and not themselves. Because as humans we have to see some sort of benefit, individual benefit in things that we do.

 

He summarises that capitalism means basically every man for himself, whereas the opposing view, socialism, the opposing economic system of socialism, is the other form of human nature, which is to do things for the advancement of the community in spite of oneself sometimes, which again can be half the reason we’re doing things at the same time. So I like that summary because it’s more personable. It sort of gets more into the nature of people and the compulsion, the motivation that goes beyond just economics and financial considerations of why people do things.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like we talk about the problems with individualism but at the same time also value liberty. Like anyone, I think like most people, most Anglo Saxons. I don’t like excessive bureaucracy and over regulation of everything. I like for normal people to be largely left alone to their own devices, to choose their own destinies up to a level. Obviously you need to put hard limits on that. But where possible, it’s good to basically bias towards freedom and have to justify it away rather than the reverse.

 

But having said that, like liberalism as an ideological framework has been obviously disastrous for our people. So it needs to be attacked at its root. And people have to come before our individual freedom ultimately.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. I was about to say that. I think politically we need to be more socialist than we are capitalists because the more socialist you are, the more you’re considering the effect on the broader community and the future generations rather than just how you are benefiting now in the moment or how you’re affected by anything happening in the moment.

 

And obviously if you’re dealing with the future of a country, you need to be more socialist in your considerations. And that’s all socialism actually means at the end of the day is considering how anything may affect the greater ethnic community. The problem with communism though is it doesn’t really consider socialism from an ethnic perspective. It doesn’t consider the group as, …

 

Joel Davis: Universal humanity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. It’s universal and it’s also class based which is just like a different form of looking at humanity on a universal basis.

 

[2:05:42]

 

70 Marx and the Destruction of Classes

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The reason why Marx identifies the proletariat as the revolutionary subject of history is not because he wants them to stay the proletariat, but because the proletariat, the working class, is being exploited by capitalism. He sees it as the vehicle to the destruction of classes.

 

So the ideal of Marxism is to abolish class and to end in a kind of, in like a universal humanity where we’re all on the same level. Like it’s about destroying the category of bourgeoisie, entirely. It doesn’t have this like perennial mindset that there’ll always be workers versus capitalists that will go on forever. Like obviously the idealist from the Marxist standpoint is to overthrow it.

 

But, whereas I think our view from the Right because we’re realists is more that like what you were saying before, that the forces that are imbued within capitalism they’re part of human nature and that they’ll always have some kind of representation within society. And it’s about trying to get the balance right. You’re never going to be able to ultimately decide on one or the other extreme. That’s kind of irrational utopianism.

 

But instead you kind of have to just take human nature for what it is and try and balance these forces as best you can. That’s a more Right-wing perspective.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. That’s definitely the attitude that’s the position I would take right now based on my understanding.

 

71 Superchat: is Techno Trance and EDM the Most Aryan Music Around?

top

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. All right. Superchat Aussie Artist 88 said:

 

“Blair bro, is techno trance and EDM the most Aryan music around? It’s the natural evolution of the Germanic spirit. Fast paced and yet spiritual. What’s your opinion?”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never thought of it that way, but maybe that’s a really interesting perspective. I can tell you no other genre of music makes me feel what I feel when I listen to really good trance and electronic dance music. Like that stuff just invigorates me in a way that’s difficult to explain through words. So it’s very possible. I do feel like it hits me on another level. One that’s hard to express. What do you think, Joel? You’re into your music a little bit, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think, I mean the most Aryan music, I mean you’ve got classical music, you’ve got like heavy metal, all the different sub genres of metal. You’ve got electronic music. You know, they’re all different like phases in technology. Like Wagner couldn’t have started a metal band because electric guitars didn’t exist yet, you know. And then I don’t know, Slayer, I mean obviously there was like synthesisers and stuff, but they didn’t have like the apparatus that you use to make electronic music wasn’t fully developed yet and it’s produces different genres. So it’s like when Aryans are dealing with electronic instruments, they make a certain kind of music. When they’re dealing with electric instruments, they make another kind of music. When they’re dealing with pre-electric instruments, they make another kind of music. You know, that’s how I see it. I don’t think it makes sense to like try and argue, one is more airing than the other. It’s like all of them are expressions of our spirit. All of them are expressions of our racial nature.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think someone just really appreciates like trance music. I can say this. A thought occurred to me as I was listening to Joel just then that I think a lot of trance music, if you listen or pay attention to the structure of how the track develops, it’s basically, and I’m not trying to be vulgar with this is a very objective analysis. It’s how sex would sound to the soul. It’s almost like the process of sex put into audio form, if you understand what I mean. Like, I don’t know how to explain it exactly, but there’s like that build up or the process.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, kind of orgasmic quality.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Reaching that climax point and then the climax point hits and it hits really hard. And that is the sort of pinnacle of the track. Just like that is the pinnacle of the experience that you have through sex. I think maybe that’s why it makes us feel a certain way that other music can’t really.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, there’s an ecstatic, there’s an ecstatic quality to it. That’s what’s appealing about it. I think that ecstatic quality is can also be found in psychedelic forms of guitar based music as well.

 

But yeah, it definitely comes through. And the lines get blurred sometimes between electronic instruments and those kinds of genres as well, particularly in recent decades. Like the kind of like music that’s categorised as goth in that spectrum, for example, often blurs the lines between those categories.

 

But yeah, I enjoy all, basically all of those genres of music. I’m glad that they all exist. They all represent different emotions. Like metal is like more epic! It’s kind of like music of like war and aggression and intensity and horror and all those kinds of spectrum of emotions. And you’ve got like gothic and alternative rock genres that have kind of romantic quality to them but they also have psychedelic quality. And then electronic music is like m can often be more ecstatic! Yeah.

 

[2:11:05]

 

72 Music Can “Spell” Us in the Same Way as a Good Speech

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it true that music can spell us in the same way that a good speech can? It’s a similar type of magic or has a similar type of effects on people. And I realised that young.

 

And one of my secrets when I was learning about public speaking was I used to study certain songs that would make me feel a certain way. And I thought:

 

“Wow, maybe I can create a speech or practise roughly the way I can deliver a speech, or a method through which I can deliver a speech where I can incorporate the same melody, or a similar melody to what I’m hearing in this song and put that melody into the words I’m speaking.”

 

So I think, there’s something to be said about that and there’s probably some sort of underground science where you can get into that and study it. I didn’t really get into anything underground but I just made the connection as a result of my own, you know, learning when I was a bit younger.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well music is the language of the soul. You know, it has like the ability to say things that words can’t. Or maybe words can say it but they can’t really convey it in the same way that that music can because it’s more, viscerally emotive.

 

This is why I think like Schopenhauer’s view on music is utterly retarded! Because for Schopenhauer music was supposed to be like a method by which we could disconnect, from like the life force and disconnect from like the drives and will embedded in the body and achieve some kind of like mystical, you know, disinterested union with the absolute or whatever. And I find generally what’s great about music is precisely the opposite. That music is the life force made manifest in its most potent form. I guess on that side I would side with Nietzsche against Schopenhauer*.

 

[*Nietzsche criticised Schopenhauer’s pessimistic view of life and suffering, advocating instead for an artistic and affirmative approach to existence. He believed that embracing suffering could lead to personal growth and strength, contrasting with Schopenhauer’s call for resignation and detachment from desires.]

 

73 Sargon of Akkad Having an Event in Australia

top

 

But yeah, anyway, Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Have you seen Tom Roussell, also known as Survive the Jive and Sargoy of Akkad are speaking in Australia later this year. Sargoy is getting more based lately and Survive the Jive has always been solid.”

 

Yeah, I did see that. There is an event. I think they’re almost sold out. They only had 100 tickets for sale and they were selling them for like a thousand bucks each or something. So meant to be like an exclusive event.

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it Sargon of Akkad. Why is he Sargoy of Akkad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s obviously a joke. Yeah, people used to call him Sargoy of Mossad well back in the day. Sargoy of Mossad. It’s pretty funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is he called that though? Is it speculated, has he been accused?

 

Joel Davis: Well, back in the day, lately he has been better. But back in the day he was a big defender of classical liberalism. He always get into debates with people from the so-called Alt-Right. There was one really famous debate that he had with Richard Spencer back in the day, like 2018 era, something like that. Maybe 2017. I can’t remember the exact year, but it was back in that era. And, yeah, he was kind on the other side of the fence.

 

Whereas lately he’s kind of come more around. Not all the way, but he’s come a lot closer to like defending ethno-nationalism. Like he’ll defend ethno-nationalism like 90% now.

 

So yeah, I don’t think that he’s like an agent of the jews or something. I think he’s just a temperamental conservative. He’s a bit cucked because he’s just a temperamental conservative. But some of the people that he platforms on his Lotus Eater podcast platform that he runs, some of them aren’t bad, some of them kind of suck. Some of them are pretty good. Young, kind of like blonde Aryan English guys who are obviously our guys. A few of them, I won’t name names but you know, had some good interactions with some of them on Twitter over the years before I was banned.

 

So yeah, I don’t have anything against him. He seems like a nice guy. I think he I think his heart’s in the right place, but he’s just a little bit cucked, obviously, for my liking, but he’s all right.

 

As for Survive the Jive, he does good stuff. I’ve always enjoyed his YouTube channel. Have you ever seen his YouTube videos? He talks a lot about you know, Anglo and Germanic and Nordic history and ancient Paganism, things like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: A little bit. Yeah. A little bit. I was gonna say that. Seems like the boys have been successful on the bullying front with a Sargoy of Akkad. [chuckling] You know, with all the names and the pressure. It’s funny to see stuff like that build on some content creators and influencers who are obviously very in love. Not in love they’re very attached to their online Persona, whatever it is that they’ve created for themselves. They’ve managed to dodge the censorship and try to be reasonable or whatever, but through just chipping away through effective bully measures, the boys just managed to shove them in the right direction, gradually!

 

Joel Davis: I saw people complaining that they got banned from my Telegram chat. Look, I got a lot of moderators. It probably wasn’t me, but I’ll tell you this. If you send a Superchat with your Telegram app, I’ll unban it. That’s the deal. It’s a guarantee you can buy your way back in!

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel!

 

Joel Davis: There you go.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m surprised. I didn’t think Joel would be so easily sway with money.

 

[2:16:20]

 

Joel Davis: But if you post garbage, you might get banned again. So watch yourself. It doesn’t guarantee you a permanent residency, but you can buy a second chance. At The Joel and Blair Show, we believe in second chances.

 

Soul Vinda said:

 

“Amazing aesthetics on that NSN edit. This is the spirit that will win over the motivated youth.”

 

Yeah, it was a sick edit. I think it might have been Gus who made it. I don’t know who made it, but I’m feeling it was Gus. Yeah, but it was a sick edit. Did you like it? Were you just blowing smoke up its arse because it was on the show? Be honest. Do you think it sucks?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no man! Did you see me dancing to it? That was shit was hype! Loved it. If it was Gus that made it, salute, bro! Excellent work! Some of these young guys are great on the edits. Yeah. I wouldn’t even know how they do it, to be honest. I used to think I was pretty good at editing and I can edit, like, videos, basic edits, but I wouldn’t even know how to produce shit like that these days. So it’s good stuff. It’s impressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t do that you should know me better than that. I don’t blow smoke up people’s asses. If you’re hearing me say something nice, it’s genuine, man! I don’t throw around false compliments. I always just try to find something about people I can appreciate. So that’s why sometimes I can come across as probably too nice. But no, yeah, I really did like the video.

 

74 Getting Around Censorship with Uploading Clips, Edits

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think Anderson puts out cool, cool edits. And yeah, that’s what you need.

 

By the way, those of you who are on TikTok, Instagram, whatever, Twitter, re-upload the edits and go find the old ones as well and spam them out there. Obviously we want you uploading clips from the show as well and other things, but get those hyper edits out there. Get, get some eyes on them! Put them particularly on places like TikTok and Instagram, where they’re gonna have more chance of going viral.

 

We’re just talking about censorship before. The main reason that we can get around censorship is part of it is through being provocative and interesting. But another massive component of it is you guys. You guys that are re-uploading content, clipping content, things like that, to make sure that even though we’re banned, the content lives on.

 

So I appreciate it. It’s one way that you can help the movement. Very easy way to help the movement is simply that.

 

Crafty Boom said:

 

“Lead the way, men. Let’s go!”

 

And Testy Testerson said:

 

“Buy a few beers on me.”

 

I see also on Entropy, Deer in the Headlights said:

 

“Carry on, gentlemen, you’re doing great work!”

 

And Shovelhead Amy said:

 

“Thanks for what you’re doing. From an avid listener here in Antario, Canada. People are paying attention.”

 

I should have said Ontario, sorry.

 

75 On Canadians and Australians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: What is with Canadians? Why do we vibe so hard with Canadians? What’s going on there? I think we’ve covered this on last couple of shows. I just keep seeing Canadians pop up all the time. And my heart goes out to Canada. They seem to be going through similar struggles and we seem to have, I don’t know, some sort of similarity between us Aussies and Canadians. They appreciate us and I appreciate them. So thanks, Canada. Thanks for watching.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but she said:

 

“From a true toque lover. Those are great toques.”

 

I wonder what a fucking “toque” is?:

 

“The consistency and level headedness that you men display is what people are Sorely craving. And I find it amusing that you call them beanies. It’s a toque. Toque is what we call them.”

 

Yeah, well we’re not fucking Canadians, so we call them beanies.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I thought? Toke, man! You know what I thought toke, meant? I thought it was a take, but it was like a take from someone that was like high on something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you give a bong head. Like “give us a toke”, that kind of thing. Yeah, no, we love Canadians. Canadians are kind of like nice versions of us. I think. They’re like, if Australians were nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the fact Canadians like us shows that perhaps they feel, I don’t know, there’s some deep appreciation for our nature and humour. So maybe they’re not as nice as they ostensibly seem or have a reputation for being. Maybe they have this like contained, …

 

Joel Davis: Unless they’re French-Canadians, they’re from the same stock. So I think they just kind of, they kind of understand us. They can, they have a similar national story. They come from the same root populations and so because of that ethnic connection, I think they can kind of understand where Australians are coming from, generally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would you agree they’re very sensible people. Canadians always seem to be well spoken, I mean it’s not always going to be the case. It’s going to be outliers. But all the Canadians that I know of, they’re well spoken, presentable, sensible, intelligent people. They’re always easy to respect.

 

76 Canadians and Scandinavians Are Too “Nice”. It’s Time to Get Savage

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you’ve kind of blown smoke up their arse a little bit now. They’re all right, they’re okay. They’re ookayy! Or whatever the fuck they say. I wish Canadians said “cunt” more! That’s my main critique of Canadians. I think there’s not enough vulgarity, not enough aggression. They’re too nice! It offends me as an Australian a little bit.

 

You know you see them, they got ice hockey going on, an aggressive national sport. If you look at their history, they’ve been great, they’ve got an incredible military history. They’re savages in their military history. Great, great victories in battle over the decades. So they’re obviously like, tough.

 

So I feel like they’re almost too nice. They’re kind of, almost like they let themselves be taken advantage of its like the great shame. Like it’s similar with Scandinavians, Scandinavians are so nice. And it’s a beautiful thing because that makes for a great society because if they’re living in a society full of their own kin, that pleasant nature, is fantastic!

 

But then under the current situation, it’s like, time to get mean! It’s time to get savage!

 

[2:22:57]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we must glorify hostility to outsiders. Hostility to outsiders must become a noble virtue, one expected of all of our kin.

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. Yes, it’s time to get mean Canadians! But Australia, I mean our issue is not so much that we’re too nice, it’s more that we’re too apathetic. We don’t care enough. That’s our problem, I think.

 

77 Superchat – Tips for Educating the Ladies on Our Politics?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Too cynical as well. Most Aussies think:

 

“It’s all going to go to shit anyway. And yeah nothing ever changes, so why bother?”

 

There’s a bit of cynicism there. But Aaron, 32, just sent through 10 bucks and he asked an interesting question. Joel, he asks:

 

“Any tips for educating the ladies on our politics? HH!”

 

I’m of the opinion you can’t really or shouldn’t bother too much. How should I phrase this? I found there’s no real use ranting about politics or trying to educate any woman on your political views. I mean, you can talk to a woman about politics if she really wants to talk about that. But generally speaking, it’s better to just lead by example. It’s better to take care of yourself, demonstrate that you can take care of yourself, be in good health, be smart, be able to provide something of value to the woman that she can see value in. I don’t know, it’s like I’ve never really seen much point in talking to women about politics, put it that way. It’s like not something that I’ve done a great deal because I see that they’re just not that interested. They’re usually interested in talking about other things.

 

And I talk about, think about politics all the time. It’s like I’m always inside my own head about it. And I network with and deal with people for political purposes all the time as well. It’s probably my primary interest still in life. And so at the end of the day, I don’t want to go home and sit with my girlfriend and talk about politics as well. I want to remove myself from that world. And I see women as being kind of outside of the world of politics. Almost like a period of relief from politics. That’s how I feel about it. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Personally, I never stop talking about the subjects that matter to me. So women are subjected to those same subjects. And usually if a woman likes me, then they want to hear about it anyway because they just kind of like hearing you mansplain. But it’s a distinction, I guess, between talking to women who don’t already like, want to have sex with you or are having sex with you, and talking like general women in the community. Because if a woman is into you, then she’ll just kind of go along like she’s probably go along with having a discussion about whatever you want to talk about because obviously you’ve got a close relationship. So I don’t think you really need advice on that. Just like, just talk about what you think.

 

But when it comes to general women, like out in the community, I think women respond better to putting things in the language of care. So talk about you know, talk about kind of like the Righteous reasons why certain people you care about are getting fucking over. Whether it be your family’s future, whether it be victims of immigrant crime, whatever, White people collectively, whatever. And talk about how you care about these groups and how that’s what motivates you and so on. I think that can bring you come across a lot more sympathetically and I think put it to them. If they challenge you, say:

 

“What about what this person has suffered? Or what about this group of people? Don’t they deserve this? Don’t they deserve that?”

 

Usually this kind of framing is more persuasive, I think, to the feminine psyche. Because the feminine psyche processes, you know, social realities more through that prism than maybe how you would talk about it with men. So I don’t know. That’s based my basic take. I mean, it’s kind of obvious, right? But it’s true.

 

Blair Cottrell: A woman just needs to be ethnically aware. Ethnically aware is kind of like bare minimum. If a woman is not ethnically aware, at least, it’s like I can’t even be bothered. I can’t be bothered even having a conversation with her about anything. Because women should have good instincts. It’s of the female nature to be in tune with one’s instinct rather than be intellectualising everything and being sort of consciously processing what they’re observing through their senses. Women are very instinctual creatures. And if a woman can’t even be in touch with their own ethnic identity. If she can’t even acknowledge it or feel connected to that, then it’s like too far gone, man! [chuckling] I just can’t deal with that.

 

Joel Davis: So I think women are also receptive to when, if you talk about like the issues with race mixing and like the desire to have children that, maintain your ancestry and that have certain traits that you have or that your family has, …

 

[2:28:21]

 

Blair Cottrell: Even the anti-racist ones, even the woman women who masquerade as anti-racists, as soon as you bring up the inheritance of certain ethnic traits that they possess, like they’re always very interested in children looking like them. Usually they’re interested in passing on their blue eyes or their blond hair. They want to do that! Which just goes to show their instinct always trumps whatever they say they believe, which is what I was trying to get at before. The words women speak is never as powerful or as effective or influential over their actions as their instinct.

 

78 Superchat – My Lefty Girlfriend Told Me That She Hates Jews

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I mean that’s definitely the case.

 

Anyway, Rigo Weber said:

 

“I just told my girlfriend that I’m currently looking into the true history of Hitler and the jews. And to my surprise, she told me that she hates jews. I found this surprising. And she’s always been a real Lefty.”

 

Well it’s not that surprising that Lefties are developing anti-semitic attitudes. I mean, generally Lefties they hate Israel. If they hate capitalism, they probably have noticed that a lot of these capitalists are jewish. There’s something jewish about capitalism, about international finance, etc.

 

So yeah, there’s certain demographics of people where it’s easier to talk to them about jews than it is to talk to them about race. And there’s other demographics where it’s easier to talk to them about race than about jews. And usually people that are more conservative, it’s easier to get to talk to them about race than it is about jews. And it’s easier inverse of people that are more of a Left-wing bias.

 

So yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. But yeah, I mean, if it’s your girlfriend, she’s gonna, even if she doesn’t agree with you, she’s gonna be open with you and like, she’s gonna trust you enough to say things that she wouldn’t say in polite company. Or she’ll like, hear you out, obviously, so you can be a lot more frank. You shouldn’t be afraid of being able to talk about how you really feel with your own girlfriend. That’s kind of fucked up!

 

79 Blair and Joel’s Interactions with Women

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never known a girl who’s like, strongly disagreed with me on anything. I’ve never been in an interaction with a female where we’ve argued about something like some social ideal, political idea, philosophy, nothing! I think when women like you, they tend to be more accepting of whatever it is you’re saying. They mimic your ideas. It’s always been really difficult for me to actually argue with a woman. I don’t even want to! Maybe that’s why. I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. I think usually I’ve always dated women who have similar political proclivities. Like, may not be like full Nazis or whatever, but they’ve always been pretty, like, Right-wing and so haven’t been offended by my views on things and then being exposed to me. Anyone who’s exposed to me on a long enough timeline basically becomes a Nazi.

 

So, yeah, whether I’m having sex or not.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you ever just asked people basic questions and watch them become frustrated by actually thinking about the answer to your question and realising how stupid it sounds?

 

Like, for example, you might be talking to some girl and she’s trying to tell you about how climate change is going to destroy the world or something. And you’ll ask her a simple question like:

 

“Okay, where did you get that information?”

 

And she’d be like:

 

“Oh, well, I was in university and this, like Professor told me.”

 

Or as part of some course or something like that. Okay:

 

“Well, where did that information come from, though? Where did they get it from?”

 

And they don’t actually, a lot of the time, like, as you just develop that line of questioning they get frustrated because they realise that it’s actually unreasonable to believe what they believe based on the sources that have, like, pass down that information to them because they can’t actually verify the sources. And by just asking them to explore those sources for a moment, they become visibly frustrated. Have you experienced that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so usually what has happened when I’ve been in social situations where there’s like, Leftist women, is they just kind of like start crying and then go to the bathroom or something. Or just basically act like as if I just did this horrible thing to them and then try and like act like a victim and then hope that someone like cucks out and sympathises with them because they’re not equipped to actually engage me in debate or critical discussion. That’s pretty much what happens every single time. So I think I have intimidating aura when it comes to debating. People don’t really like debating me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t get people who are like political to debate me at this point. Like no one wants to debate me, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everyone has their strengths and yours is arguing a point. And you know any person in touch with some semblance of common sense knows that there are some armies not to engage, there are some battles not to fight.

 

And one of the battles not to fight in my opinion is entering into open debate with Joel Davis! [chuckling] Yeah, everyone’s good at something.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, we’ve been going for two and a half hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

80 Update on Tom Sewell’s Court Case – Prosecution Will Drop Case If Doesn’t Claim Legal Fees

top

 

Joel Davis: I hope everyone enjoyed the show. Like I said, Monday night our time late Monday night I’ll do a one off stream with Thomas777. By the way, update. Tom Sewell he had caught this week on Thursday another pre-trial conference, and it got basically adjourned for another week. Because basically what happened is that the prosecution offered to drop the charges against Tom if he wouldn’t pursue them for legal costs. So they were like we wouldn’t want to pay your lawyer fees for all us dicking you around for the last four months but we’re willing to drop the charge. Meaning like obviously he didn’t do it. And, he was like:

 

“No, you’re going to pay my legal fees, or you can’t like drop the charge, make me pay lawyer fees and then not front up for it.”

 

And so now the prosecution needs another week apparently to figure out whether it wants to pay his legal fees or not so what a joke, the legal process can be! But hopefully that resolves itself soon and we’ll have Tom on the show again soon.

 

81 Jacob Hersant Has Court Re Appealing His Roman Salute Sentence

top

 

Also Jacob Hersant has court this week. I can’t remember which day. Do you remember the dates?

 

[2:35:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: What dates?

 

Joel Davis: Hersant has court next week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you were going to say has “caught something”. Not has like “court”, legal.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no, no! He was sentenced to one month in prison for the Roman salute but then appealed it to the county court. The county court is going to conduct the trial this coming week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: I think it might come on the 10th, but we’ll update you.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, you’ll have to ask him.

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to go down there, at least one of the days, it’s like a three day trial, so I’m probably not going to sit through all three days of the trial. But I’m going to go down there and suss out what’s going on and give Jacob some support. And, we’ll cover it and we’ll report to you what’s happening. So that should be interesting if he wins or not. Obviously it’s a constitutional case as well. So that makes it doubly interesting. It’s challenging the Constitutionality of the act itself.

 

So that’s all happening this week. So there’s going to be some interesting kind of legal wranglings through next week for Tom and Jacob. And we’ll, yeah, probably cover that next week on the show. Plus whatever else is going down. There’s always something interesting. It never stops.

 

Thank God! We continuously make news because there really isn’t that much news in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: You imagine how boring, …

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if we had to log in and talk about how:

 

“Oh, Gerard Rennick was talking shit about Pauline Hanson on Twitter this week. Oh, wow!”

 

Blair Cottrell: How boring would Australian politics be if there was no NSN [National Socialist Network]? There’s been nothing happening! You just have your Sky News shills. I don’t even want to imagine it. I’m thankful for the current political situation, for you guys doing what you do. It makes things very interesting. Keeps pushing boundaries, which I’ve always been sympathetic to that kind of activity. Yeah.

 

Thanks for joining us guys. It’s been a cosy night. It’s been a good stream. We’ve gone for a little longer than we usually do, and I guess we’ll see you guys next week, right?

 

Is there anything else, Joel, before we finish up?

 

82 On the Physical Characteristics of Some Nationalists

top

 

Joel Davis: No. I see people are arguing in the chat. Megawatts says:

 

“I’m 190 centimetres built built beast. But I don’t seem like it from the face.”

 

But then Skinhead Friend said:

 

“I’m only three metres tall. So it’s like the opposite of an Anglo king you see, on the battlefield, Joel is taller IRL than in lore.”

 

Anyway, it’s kind of humourous, it’s ambiguous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel’s this weird blend between nerd and Chad, I don’t know, he’s like multifaceted, personality. But you get some of those. I’ve always noticed that whenever you get, any sort of character in politics which becomes prominent for whatever reason, they sometimes a blend of several different stereotypes. They never kind of, they’re never one dimensional and there’s something to be said for that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like most, it’s interesting too. Like most nationalists, prominent nationalists are usually pretty tall. Like Keith Woods is like six-five. You’re like six-four. I know Ferryman from Canada is like six-four. Hersant and myself are pretty tall. We’re over six, well over six foot. Tom Sewell’s the only prominent [chuckling] I could think of actually he’s under six foot, but he makes up for it because he could probably bash all of us! So that’s the thing, like you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone thinks Tom’s short.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s just like all these mates are too tall! It’s just kind of not fair really. He’s like normal size.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s one of the things. But he also has like it’s the way he’s built because he’s so compact and like square built, strong shoulders, strong legs and shit! I think because he has the long torso, like if Tom and I sit next to each other, he literally looks taller than me because he’s got like a long torso and he sits upright, he’s got good posture. Whereas I slouch and all my height is in my legs. If I sit down I look shorter than him. So it’s a weird sort of aesthetic thing where, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s not such a good squat because he’s got those squatter’s legs.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’s got like the most perfect squat I’ve ever seen! So I don’t know, everyone’s got their strengths.

 

But yeah, I suppose we’ll see you guys next week. We’ll wrap it up there. I need to go to the bathroom.

 

Joel Davis: White power! Blood and honour! Hail Hitler! It’s all happening.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[2:40:27]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/15/2025 = 43)

johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
the succulent meal guy, recently did an interview and admitted that he was robbing safes. he just got out of prison
0 likes

Report
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
4 days ago
I know a couple Davis’s here in Pennsylvania. Good people
0 likes

Report
MrAnglo
Supporter
5 days ago
Never Compromise and Cuck. That is your Tactic. End of Discussion.
0 likes

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – Tactical N-Word – Jun 6, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/08/joel-davis-tactical-n-word-jun-6-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the tactical use of the N-word as used by NSN members in Melbourne with their Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner drop in front of a major shopping centre where Sudanese had engaged in a machete fight. See Table of Contents for points discussed. – KATANA]
01 Clip of Trump Using the N-Word
02 Trump vs Musk Feud
03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes
04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons
05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!
06 Whites created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism?
07 How Irish are you? Joel and Blair’s ancestry
08 DNA labs selling your data to interested parties
09 History of the name Davis
10 Davises in the US had slaves resulting in niggers having the name!
11 Whites, jews, blacks and the slave trade
12 Instagram and the very positive response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes action
13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response
14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party
15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre
16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants
17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites
(Cont’d)
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 27,900 – Duration: 160 mins]
0 likes

FJB6666
5 days ago
Joel looks like a Sikh pajeet with that black beeny on.
0 likes

Report
cowolf
6 days ago
Speaking about the tactics. (I don’t know if you guys even read the comments here, never seen any response.) Sorry but I think you have to get rid of Hitler connotation (images, symbols, at least modify Roman salute), and this is from the supporter of the White cause, an European here. I haven’t seen any honest analysis of what Hitler actually did wrong. I mean, you have literally unlimited amount of material condemning Hitler and making him the greatest villain of all time (which he wasn’t, probably Stalin was) but it all comes from the Hitler’s enemies, it all comes from the WWII winners. What I want to hear is a reflection on Hitler’s mistakes from the Hitler’s supporters. And that is pretty obvious that you can’t go anywhere if you don’t know what went wrong in the first place and don’t want to repeat the mistakes. I watched the whole 12 hours of ‘Europa The Last Battle’ and while it is quite interesting there’s not a single word on what went wrong and why. For most of the countries of anti-German coalition of WWII Hitler will never be acceptable. You may not care that much but that’d be already the first problem: Whites need to learn how to make allies and how to support each other. So first of all, Hitler was not pro-White, he was only pro-German. That’s why he cannot be a unifying figure for all Whites. Every country Hitler attacked was at the time 100% White and nearly 100% Christian. Basically Germany didn’t kill a single non-white during the whole war, it was all White genocide. And tell me how can you blame everything on Jews then make ally with Soviet Union and bomb, burn and loot Poland? The biggest mistake Hitler did was to attack Poland, then it all went downhill. I am happy to hear any constructive opinions.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
6 days ago
I don’t know if it helps but WW2 was mostly about weakening Europe to then strengthen and later weaken the United States (ending segregation, making racism illegal, mass immigration, etc). Hitler could have kept his country on par with the United States without engaging in any war and could have kept his country purely white (if you consider the brown eye’d people white) but he didn’t. He decided to put it in harm’s way by attacking the entire White world FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. Hitler’s people weren’t on the verge of becoming minorities like they are now.. (THANKS TO HITLER) You’d have to be foolish as hell to think Hitler cared about White people or Germany. You’d also have to be pretty dim to think Hitler didn’t massively assist the Jews with his rhetoric and acts against them. Israel was created not long after WW2. Any criticism of Jews or nonwhites in general is the most perceived evil thing anyone can do now thanks to Hitler. Whereas before, it was nothing but common sense to criticize and to attack one’s enemy. I also don’t think Stalin is as evil as Hitler because Stalin didn’t make White people evil by being racist and losing a war. Good luck in life fellow white.
1 like

Report
johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
optics cuck. stop being a pussy.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
cowolf
3 days ago
I asked specifically for ‘constructive opinions’ so get lost and stop being a low IQ retard.
0 likes

Report
BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Blair was talking about my brown college room mate. White people are stupid suckers handing out freebies to him.
0 likes

Report
predatorstomperrr
6 days ago
I’m an American white man and all my friends watch you while we watch ufc. Love you Joel! Don’t ever stop we cna win
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The parks r inaccessible BC we r all destined to 15 mins Eutopean cities where you will own nothing & be happy. If you leave more than you r allowed you will pay for it.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
When I worked with Redskins the conclusion I came to was they are embarrassed of their past. I saw more racism in nons all my life. Whites are hated BC they ARE superior.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who owns Ayers Rock?
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who misses military style education system? It’s the I’m ok ur ok bs ruining & satanizing society.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Just bought a cemetery plot where my great grandparents/grandparents/mother/sister are buried. All Catholics are buried there but BC the cemetery was turned over to township with woke employees it’s now a free for all like the ppl buried there have been excommunicated or something. My ancestors were the ones who had to hike in 10miles of bush with bags of flour on their backs to create farmland, roads & not mudhuts. Do you guys not know the PCR tests of last 4 yrs was taking everyone’s DNA to assess mRNA jabs while causing brain damage.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The guys I follow are bent on dead weight lifting. I have a bunch of dead weights as friends. Lol Do you want them to lift BC I think it’s not being able to lift it’s about endurance. I was blessed to have the company of big strong guys on a 20km hike to have them barfing their under duress guts out all stressed/burnt out having the priest yelling “Just put one foot in front of the other” trying to avoid airlift out. I was 65 yo & could have redid the hike. Heard yrs later how it took a bunch of younger kids 3 days & 2 camping nites to do it. Lol. And boomers get constant lashings. I guess some yuppy boomers deserve it.
1 like

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
Cottrell’s are also Jewish without being disrespectful to Blair.
0 likes

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
The Normans fought a bigger battle in Durres Albania in 1081 against the Eastern Roman empire so Norman’s decendants are there also.
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states!
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states! WPWW o/ Hail Victory!
0 likes

Report
newgerman
6 days ago
ban nz not machetes…says it all in four words AAAAA+++++++
0 likes

Report
basedrespillzeus22
6 days ago
Great stream lads
0 likes

Report
GhostDogMan
Supporter++
1 week ago
lol. You guys are in Winter!! I just remember you are our Polar opposite brethren!
3 likes

Report
A655321
1 week ago
Blair, you don’t live in a traditional democracy anymore do you… Like my country you in a “Liberal democracy,” which exists to constrain the majority, turning the state into a referee for protected classes and global norms, rather than an instrument of national will. The government could care less if we are all replaced.
4 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Pakenham was a beautiful area back in the Australian days. Ironically, it was a place the youth of old Melbourne would run to for sporting fun on the weekends.
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
I wanna hear from the banner offended as their spleen is ruptured by a multiculturally enriched machete thrust.
1 like

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 week ago
I want to hear the NSN policies on the Covid jew-juice. Materialistic Jew-Pharma is going to ethnically cleanse us all, and a lot of people are angry and activated by the government policies. There is no pushback/accountability.
-1 likes

Report
mrwordsworth
1 week ago
it’s pronounced took
0 likes

Report
1488Brother
1 week ago
Yo four ads is crazy before I can get to a tactical N word.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
It isn’t a damn machete crisis. It is a niggerdom crisis. I need my machetes for clearing brush. I don’t need the negroes/Muslims. They provide no value to anyone.
21 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
1 week ago
Exactly, Blair. Heat is for browns.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL “caught” and “court” are homophones in Australian English. W North American English for clarity.
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Trump/Elon distraction from real issue? – Mass surveillance/ PALANTIR Trump bill measures; https://youtu.be/Fg1JZDIconk?si=BGA8h
-1 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah my Nationalist account on IG was banned, hell also I was private.
1 like

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL about KIN-dness.
-1 likes

Report
BlueNorth88
1 week ago
About censorship also, it can give content creators a kind of glamour. Look how Tommy and others milk it to death when it happens. Also the guys that follow to any smaller platform and remain loyal are true followers.
1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Blacks in London, Detroit and now Melbourne, all with the same result. Almost like race is the problem and Magic Soil is a myth.
11 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Why has Blair got a tea cosy on his head? lol
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Otoya_Yamaguchi_G00k
1 week ago
Australia was invented and built by Europeans for Europeans only. https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/the-white-australia-policy-%28feat.:6
9 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Symbolic Victory – May 30, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/02/joel-davis-symbolic-victory-may-30-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: 1. The show is resuming after a break, with the hosts discussing recent events.
2. Joel Davis mentions no longer having “onerous bail conditions”.
3. They discuss weightlifting and an upcoming competition.
4. Joel aims for a 220kg deadlift: “That’s my ideal. If I can hit 220 at nationals, I’ll be ecstatic!”
5. They discuss the challenges of heavy lifting and potential injuries.
6. They talk about a recent court appearance in Adelaide.
7. Joel describes interactions with journalists: “And these journalists, they’re all women. Sometimes in Melbourne, you get these really, like, soy, Lefty, ugly journalists.”
8. They discuss how charges against them are being dropped.
9. Joel criticises the police: “The South Australia Police are a bunch of scumbags!”
10. They discuss African gang violence in Australia.
11. Joel says: “Basically the only thing holding together our society right now is White guys who train because police don’t actually do anything at this point.”
12. They discuss the concept of “Anarcho Tyranny”.
13. Joel talks about attending an event at New South Wales Parliament.
14. They discuss the concept of Universal vs. Particular in philosophy and politics.
15. Joel says: “Until we can go back and say what the Nazi, like the kind of so-called “Nazi” coded what they asserted, that a particular nation can just be itself and assert itself on its own terms.”
16. They discuss the importance of asserting White Identity.
17. Joel criticises the Right-wing for constantly “cucking” to the morality of their enemies. (Cont’d)
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 274. We are live tonight on all the usual places. That means we’re live on Odysee, DLive, Rumble and Entropy. Please, please, please share the stream. As you know, I’m the most de-platformed man in Britain. The most de-banked man in Britain. I can’t get the word out. Help me get the word out.

 

I’ve also been one of the busiest men in Britain. I’ve been streaming at the moment for some days, 5 hours or more per day. I’ve been invited on numerous shows. I’m going on anyone’s show that invites me. I’m on Red Ice after this at 10:00. I’m also with Adam Green tomorrow and with David Duke on Friday, Tim Murdoch Friday evening. And I’ve got a video coming out on Friday called Starmer’s Guide to Rioting Two Tier Policing Exposed.

 

So please, please do check out all of those things that I’m doing, or as many as you can. And please understand, if my voice is a little hoarse and I don’t sound my usual self, it’s because of the sort of work rate that I’ve been engaged in over the last week or so. I’m very, very tired. But we’re still going to give you a fantastic show tonight.

 

Also, it will be noted by long term viewers that I’m not wearing the Black Shirt. That’s because it’s absolutely boiling here. And if I’m basically sitting in for the beginning of 4 hours plus of streaming, basically I wanted to be comfortable. So my apologies for the lack of usual shirt, but it’s going to be a long night and I’ve got a lot of things planned over the next few days. Not only that, but we are also protesting. PA are out protesting outside HMP Hull on Saturday at 01:00 pm calling for Sam Melia to be freed from jail. So I’ve got lots of things happening.

 

Now if you like this show, if you like these streams, if you appreciate all the work I’ve been doing, please do consider making a small donation. Please consider a small gift towards my work. I don’t take a wage from the movement. Everything I get is here on these streams. I thank you in advance for that. Please, I say this every week. You know, we have thousands of people viewing. Please consider a small donation. $3, $5, $10, whatever you can afford. Please don’t leave it to the usual big donors to have to dig deep. Please consider making a small contribution. Now, any contribution that has a question or statement attached will be read out in the second hour of the show. You can also donate or contribute via Entropy or by crypto links. All the crypto links are down in the description below.

 

And finally, if you want to write to me, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. However, as you can probably realise at the moment, I’m getting a massive amount of emails. I’m sort of snowed under. I’m working late every night, doing all these long streams, dragging myself out of bed trying to get through the emails. So if the reply rate is slightly slower than usual, please do accept my apology on that one.

 

Anyway, let’s get straight into the show tonight. We’ve got the amazing Ayatollah with us this evening. He was one of the three main hosts of TASOB [The Absolute State Of Britain]. He’s a great voice for this movement. He’s one of my closer friends within the movement. I love spending time with this guy. I was really made up that he made it to the PA camp this year. He’s an absolutely fantastic guy. As I say, I’m proud to call him a friend, and he’s always producing great content. I usually say nice things about the people coming on because I hand pick the people who come on as good people that I want to spend, 2 hours with. But I’ve got to say, over the last week or so, Tollah’s takes have been absolutely fantastic!

 

So if you’re not subbed to him on his Odysee, on his Telegram, make sure you are, because his takes have been really what people need to hear. He’s been calling it right down the line, and I thank him for that, because the more sensible, clear voices we have calling for the right course of action, the more likely it is that we can steer what’s going on away from sort of mad, uncontrolled, you know, violence and disorder, but towards some kind of positive political change. Because what we’ve got to remember before we get into this show, I just want to be really clear about this. This is a response to three little girls being murdered. And also it’s a response to many other things that have happened.

 

But to stop those things happening to us, we can’t just direct our anger and rage wildly at police officers or I, you know, buildings, etcetera. We have to channel that through political means and we have to use peaceful means of demonstration to bring about change and to force the government to accept our talking points. We absolutely can’t be dragged into a situation where thousands of racially minded young men are languishing in jail cells for a moment of madness!

 

Anyway, Tollah’s been saying it how it is. How are you doing, my friend? And, boy, has it been a crazy week!

 

The Ayatollah: Well, I’m better after that effusive intro, Mark. Cheers, mate. No, I’ve been grafting today, actually, mate. You know, I’m not exactly prolific in the field of manual work, but I’ve been, like, shoveling soil and turf and smashing up slabs today.

 

I mean, I got whacked in the nose by a bit of rebar today after wielding the sledgehammer.

 

So, I mean, crikey, the last time I saw that many spades, it was when I was watching Straight Out of Compton. So straight in there as someone that’s liable to get us both in trouble after a good start.

 

[06:00]

 

Mark Collett: Well, we’re getting arrested tomorrow, so I won’t be at the Sam Melia demo. Thanks for that, Tollah!

 

The Ayatollah: Okay. Yeah, I mean I joke, but to anyone outside of Britain, no, it is almost that bad. And we’re going to be seeing more evidence of that over the coming days.

 

But, yeah, I mean, we’ll obviously get into the finer details of it, but, I mean, what we’ve seen over the past sort of nine days, I think it’s the kind of thing which, … It’s the first sign of something which a lot of us thought might take 10, 20 years to happen in Britain, but then also wouldn’t have been surprised had it happened when it did. I mean, actually, one thing I will say that may have got lost in this, because obviously, our sort of commentary has been very., … You know, people will have focused very much on domestic commentary. Rightly so, actually, because some of the commentary from America has been pretty poor.

 

And also we can probably comment better on American matters than Americans can on ours sometimes. I think one of the best takes was actually from Mike Enoch, Mike Penovich, who commented upon some disorder at a hotel housing fighting age foreign men in Rotherham and talked about the fact that the person livestreaming it was saying:

 

“I’ve got no problem with any colour, any religion, whatever else.”

 

And said:

 

“This is programmed speech.”

 

The thing that is really revealing whether we approve of the specific actions or not is the sentiment behind the actions. Unlawful actions. Yeah, but how do we get here? And whose kind of vision for Britain and for all countries, actually, not just all White countries, would make all of this kind of stuff literally. I mean, not even so much impossible as just inconceivable in the first place, as the people that they go to great efforts to lock up, to debank, to de-platform, to censor, to try and intimidate into silence, which the police have done with me, by the way, in laughably sort of harebrained, condescending attempts, as is kind of their typical sort of modus operandi.

 

We’re the exact people whose vision for the world would prevent any of this kind of thing being possible. You don’t get race rows, much less race riots, in monoracial societies. You know, that is, societies that are left to develop naturally and pursue their own destiny rather than subjected to demographic meddling and actually ill meaning demographic atrocities.

 

I mean, I’ll say one thing on that point just before, just as a general observation on this. Here’s a good test of the intentions of the powers that be for anyone not as kind of informed as us, for the uninitiated. If bringing in around about 20 million foreigners into the country over the past few generations was just some honest to goodness, well meaning mistake that the powers that be thought:

 

“Well, that’ll be good, won’t it?”

 

And then it went horribly wrong. Any benevolent government, after seeing hundreds of Muslim mobs of Muslim men armed, chanting Alah Akbar in Stoke on Saturday, frankly, a well meaning state would have literally been:

 

“Okay, well, the police can’t deal with that. We’ll send the army in.”

 

As it is, and I don’t think this will. But if something like this got to the stage of the army being sent in at this stage, they’d be asked to be visiting brutality upon White people. They wouldn’t be being asked to police foreigners. That’s the situation we’re in.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I think you’ve raised a good point, really, about the Muslim community and about what we’ve seen in Stoke and other places and specifically Birmingham this week.

 

Now, that was sort of my second point on the agenda.

 

But I think the real battle cry at the moment is “two tier policing”, or I’m loath to call it two tier policing, because it’s not just two tier policing, it’s a two tiered justice system. The entire justice system is a two tier justice system. And this is being shown up mostly by the Muslim community. So I saw more of what was going on in Birmingham the other night where you had gangs of Muslims in balaclavas with weapons, in some cases. They threatened Sky News reporters. The Sky News team quickly cut the feed and were sort of making apologies for them. They were attacking motorists in cars. White patrons of a pub had to basically blockade the door and keep them out because people were terrified that they were going to burst in and murder them.

 

And then we saw what happened in Stoke, which was obviously at the end of last week, where there was a large Muslim gang which was wielding weapons. And when we say weapons, we mean, you know, machetes, planks of wood, bats. One of them had a sword. People were carrying knives quite openly. And the way the police dealt with them was to very calmly have a guy in a blue vest, a police liaison officer, speaking to them in a megaphone, saying:

 

“Please go back to your mosque, take your weapons back to your mosque. Please be a good little group of ethnic minority citizens. You know, nothing’s going to happen to you, but please go back to your mosques.”

 

Now, I think this is going to stick in the craw of many White people because White people are now seeing White lads getting sent down. The first one’s been sent down today for three years for being involved in disorder.

 

But at the same time, you’ve got these Muslim gangs walking down the street with swords and you haven’t seen a single arrest. You’ve not seen any riot police, and not only have you not seen any riot police or any arrests, but you’ve actually seen these absolutely cucked police chiefs going to the mosque and opening with a Muslim greeting! I can’t remember what the Muslim greeting.

 

[11:57]

 

The Ayatollah: [Muslim greeting] I mean, I would know that, wouldn’t I?

 

Mark Collett: You would. That was it.

 

So what’s your thoughts on that? Because I know this didn’t start with Islam, but Islam is probably the greatest and most visible tool to show people that there is this two tier justice system and that we’re the Second Class citizens.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, there are a few things to say about that.

 

I mean, I referenced Mike Penovich’s post earlier the other day saying that actually, okay, people make the noises they know they’re supposed to make, but people’s actions do tell a different story, which is they are sick of living in a country which feels like some weird, like a Benetton advert turned into a zombie apocalypse. They’re sick of it! And that’s not just Muslims.

 

However, I will contradict people. And a good mate of mine who’s been watching my streams for years was saying during my stream on Friday night:

 

“This is all about race, it’s not Islam.”

 

But Islam plays a big part in this because the simple fact is you could be looking at Algerians. I’ve just said this in the chat, so you could be looking at Algerians in France. You could be looking at Moroccans in the Netherlands. You could be looking at Somalis in Sweden, Turks in Germany, you know, Pakistanis in Britain. Bangladeshis in the East End.

 

The simple fact is these are people from all different parts of the world. Similar patterns of aggression and violence and hostility and intractability and basically, yeah, just supremacism and implacable hostility are present everywhere, despite totally different ethnic origins.

 

Now, there are small exceptions. Certain types of people who left Iran after the Iranian revolution, a little bit different.

 

But then you get into the realm of different class, different set, whatever. The broad strokes are, as I’ve just set them out. Now, doctrine and religion play a big part in that. We’ve got one or two sort of genuine Muslim allies. I’m not talking about that fat, inbred idiot Sheikh Solomon that Nick Fuentes is paired up with. Who’s there going:

 

“Oh, the French have rejected the far-Right in Hebrew!”

 

After Le Pen lost in the second round. You know, I’m not talking about these spastics, if you forgive me for being a little bit not family friendly, but I’m talking about decent people who were kind of literate in kind of mid 19th century, mid 20th century ideology and so on, particularly as it pertained actually to the Arab world a couple of generations ago.

 

But, yeah, I mean, the two tier police. Mean, first, the other thing to say about this is, look, the police. I think Blair Cottrell had a good point about this the other day. He said:

 

“You know, look, if doorman are intervening in a bar brawl, the one they’ll try and get out of the door is the one that looks like the weaker party because he’s less hard work, there’s less potential for things to go wrong.”

 

And that’s what you’ve seen. You know, the wheel that squeals the loudest is just the first to get the grease. The police are quite happy to issue speeding tickets and harass you over something you posted on the Internet because you will comply. They don’t want to go onto a traveler site and arrest someone because then they’ve got the whole site to deal with. They don’t want to go and deal with Pakistanis for the same reason.

 

 

So the sight, yeah, of these snivelling wretches:

 

“Oh, yeah. You know, please, I don’t want to think we’re against you, just please leave your weapons in the mosque.”

 

Leave your weapons in the mosque! Britain in 2024, Zionist occupied Britain! And don’t forget that bit! Because I don’t want to be accused of that. Of losing sight of the root cause of this. Yeah. Zionist Occupied Britain [ZOB]. And there’s been two videos going around today. I’ve seen one with a straight face. Some cop are going:

 

“Yeah, salaam alaykum. Look, we don’t do two tier policing in it, bruv.”

 

You know, alaikum on salaam. Or whatever. Yeah, do me a favour!

 

I mean, how must Britain look to the rest of the world? I mean, and that is obviously one of the big stories of this. We’ll probably get onto the Elon Musk thing. I mean, Elon Musk being at the forefront of it, like, obviously, the swivel eyed idiots who owe everything:

 

“Oh, Russia! Threats to our democracy!”

 

Of course. What they’re doing is then the whole thing of going well. Oh, yeah. No one’s writing for any good reason. They don’t know why they’re writing:

 

“We would just say nothing whatsoever about the fact that three girls were slaughtered by an African last week.”

 

And, yes, people will, when they go out and when the lid comes off and they act in ways that wouldn’t be advisable. Yeah, they’ve got quite a lot of pent up resentment over things that have happened involving the Muslim community.

 

Now, however did that happen?

 

However, as I say, you know what they will do is they kind of like, go:

 

“Yeah, we don’t know why this happened. You know, we were all fine. They’re just agitating. It’s billionaires, and it’s Elon Musk agitating to undermine our democracy!”

 

You look like complete idiots in front of the rest of the world! In fact, no, you look worse than that. We’ll get into what you look like.

 

But anyway, talked for long enough.

 

[16:29]

 

 

Mark Collett: No, mate, you made some very good points. And look, it’s very difficult when you do one show a week for 2 hours to know where to go with this chat, because there are so many things to cover and things are happening so quickly.

 

Now one thing that we can see is that it’s definitely a two tier policing system.

 

 

But the second thing we’ve seen is White people aren’t calming down. Usually White people are the first group to calm down. Well, they’re not calming down. They’re not calming down, and they’re not getting back in their box.

 

And credit to Elon Musk, he’s not letting me back on Twitter. But credit to Elon Musk, he is speaking out in a good way. He is highlighting this. He’s been highlighting the case of Sam Melia. He’s been highlighting the fact that people are getting arrested for things they’ve said on social media. And it’s got to wind up normal people when you see sort of men and women, you know, sat in their living rooms, police bursting through the door, arresting them for a Facebook post, when you do have these gangs of Muslims, you know, threatening a Sky news journalist and just walking away from it as if, like:

 

“Oh, well, you know, we’re giving them a pass.”

 

And you see so much institutional power behind these Muslim groups as well. You know, Jess Phillips came out straight away saying:

 

“Muslims doing this, it’s all fake news. It’s all fake news. They were scared that the far-Right were coming to their area. This was a community response. This was people defending themselves!”

 

Absolutely not! Look, if somebody said they were going to come to my house and kill me tonight. If somebody tonight in the chat said:

 

“Look, I’m coming to your house tonight, this is your address. And they put out my address, and said I’m coming to kill you!”

 

And I sat outside on my porch with a sword on my knees, waiting for somebody to turn up. The only people turning up would be the police to arrest me. But these guys can do that in the street. If we do something that’s based on fake news, we’d still get arrested. No arrests for them! But Musk seems to have had enough of it.

 

Now, I’m not saying Musk’s the most powerful man on the planet, because he’s not. He doesn’t have either the institutional power or the governmental power that other interest groups do. But he is the richest man on the planet and he is the King of Twitter-X. And at the moment, he is saying the right thing. Do you think that’s going to lead to a wave of crackdowns on that platform?

 

Because I’ll tell you this now, it was announced earlier today. I don’t know if you’ve seen it, but the Director of Public Prosecutions has come out and said:

 

“It is an offence to retweet something that’s offensive.”

 

So what they’re saying now is if say somebody tweets the n-word, and you just retweet it, you’re as culpable as they are. And they’re now saying that they’ve got Twitter-X firmly in their sights.

 

How do you see this playing out between the state and Elon Musk?