Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to tonight’s stream. We’re live on Odysee, Rumble, DLive and Entropy. And I’ve got a wonderful panel for you here tonight to discuss the big issue of, well, the last week or so, and it’s obviously Trump’s war for Israel or Trump’s war on Iran for Israel, to be more precise.

 

Now, the guys I’ve got with me I’ll be introducing shortly. It’s of course Natty and Yuro from the Nationalist A-Team. We’re going to cover some of the things we covered last Sunday quickly. And then we’re going to go deeper into things. Everyone’s going to get roughly an equal time to talk. I’m not going to be putting people on an egg timer, but we’ve probably got nine or ten topics and if everyone puts sort of three, four minutes into each topic, it’ll be about a 90 minute presentation. So stick around. It’s going to be pretty entertaining or at least pretty enlightening.

 

You might have noticed I’m not on camera tonight. My apologies for that it’s not because I’m being rude. Slightly under the weather today, actually. I don’t know whether I sound it and if I do, my apologies. But I am doing my best to essentially be as chirpy as humanly possible, all things considered.

 

Now, if you like this stream, please share it. If you really like this dream, please consider making a donation. Please consider contributing to my work. You can do so via Entropy and also directly through Rumble. Anything that is sent tonight, any Superchat, any donation that has a message attached, the message will be read out live on tonight’s stream.

 

So we will talk about that. So if you’ve got a different point of view, if you’ve got something you want to raise, if you think we’ve missed something, or if you just say:

 

“Look, Mark, I really appreciate the fact that you’ve been consistent for the last, 26 years and I want to keep you fighting even though you’re banned from everywhere.”

 

I appreciate that as well.

 

So thank you in advance for everyone who Superchats. You can also donate by crypto all the crypto links in the description below.

 

And finally you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. Although I didn’t answer emails this morning, again under the weather. So sorry guys, back to things on Monday. Unless I’ve got some kind of horrible illness that drags on past then and sort of takes me out, which I’m sure I haven’t. That’s quite a morbid thought. Anyway! We are going to get into it now, but before we do that, let’s go around the group and we’ll introduce everyone.

 

Now, the first is of course Natty. You know him from the Nationalist A-Team and also from numerous other streams that he’s done with me in the past. Natty’s a guy that’s been around since the beginning of PA. He’s been to all the meetings, at conferences, camps, etc, and he’s always someone that everyone likes hearing from.

 

In fact, I always say that if I had a wingman on PWR, it would be this guy here. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? I hope you are well.

 

Natty: Yeah, I’m good. I’m enjoying watching Tel Aviv burn. I’m sure we’re gonna talk about the ins and outs of what that means, but yeah, I’m good apart from that it’s been a bit of a crazy week trying to keep up with everything and I think my wife has suffered constantly looking across at me and seeing my face buried in my phone because I’m trying to, I’m monitoring the situation. But yeah, it’s very interesting times.

 

Mark Collett: Do you ever get it where you’re out on the sort of a supposed family event and the wife’s like:

 

“Why aren’t you paying any attention? All you’re doing is sitting on the phone. What can be so important that you need to be on your phone at this family event?”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Look, you know, Israel is on fire. Tel Aviv is being hit with hypersonic missiles. Chill out!”

 

Natty: It’s like:

 

“Honey, there’s cluster munitions going off above a suburb in Tel Aviv. This is really important. [chuckling] I’m watching it right now! It’s amazing!”

 

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] that’s kind of that’s kind of the str. I’d say that that’s the struggle that we have.!

 

Anyway, we’ve also got Yuro with us tonight. He’s obviously famous because Yuro used to do The Absolute State of Britain podcast.

 

And again, he’s a very able wing man. He has been on the National A-Team standing in for Sam. He always has good takes, he’s a funny guy and sometimes I bully him a bit, which is a little unfair, but that’s because I love him and see him as like my little brother, My little brother who needs the odd sort of monkey scrub and jab in the ribs, but he’s like my little brother, so I still love him.

 

Anyway, Yuro, how are you doing, my friend?

 

Yuro: I’m good. I’ve also been keenly paying attention watching Middle East Spectator and other such channels on Telegram. You know, it’s, I think there’s a lot more censorship obviously during the 12 Day War that was going on between Iran and Israel before. It was very much like:

 

“Well, what can we believe? How much are they not showing you?”

 

And it’s just that more. So we see all of Iran’s failures and then some things that’s like disinfo and we see all of Israel’s successes and then some, and some of that’s disinfo. And it’s kind of hard to even know what’s real.

 

[04:47]

 

Natty: That’s a good point actually because just briefly, it does seem like the information blackout from Israel was way more intense during the 12 Day War. And it seems like now because of the scope and the breadth of everything, just more is getting through or you’re able to find out more. And I’m sure this isn’t true, if you check the BBC or just some other like ZOG regime outlet, you’re not going to be seeing anything hitting Israel. But that’s what everyone’s interested in. That’s what everyone wants to see. [chuckling] You know, how many hypersonics hit Tel Aviv? This time, you know what US asset has just been blown up by a drone in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain or wherever it is. That’s what people are interested in seeing. They want to see the underdog smacking the bully in the mouth. And that’s what happens when a cheap Shahed drone gets through a multi-million dollar interceptor screen and like blows up a THAAD [Terminal High Altitude Area Defense] radar system or something. That’s what everyone’s into, right? Everyone wants to see that. No one wants to see like Iranian suburbs being like caught on fire and hit with JDAMs and hit with Tomahawk missiles because that’s just brutal civilian casualties, which is what ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] is good at.

 

Yuro: Well, the funny thing is to see America in this war using the copy of the Iranian kamikaze drones. They’ve got their own basically one to one copy of the Shahed drone that they’ve now rolled out and they’re starting to fire back at the Iranians. Because it was just like the near perfect design that they’re like:

 

“We can’t make any better than this. We’re just going to copy it.”

 

Natty: Yeah. You know, for the grand and mighty American empire is reverse engineering Third World brownoid country drones [chuckling] that sound like lawnmowers when they’re flying through the sky!

 

But yeah, that’s what America’s up to these days. I mean, you can’t really claim it’s the European heritage stock that’s like the most genius country in the world. It’s just not that anymore, I’m afraid, guys.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. But we’ve got a lot to talk about. So and we do actually have just. We do have a little sort of running order as well, tonight. I’m not going to read it out, but I was going to post it actually and say:

 

“Look, these are all the things we’ll be discussing.”

 

But there’s a lot to discuss and we’re going to go through things from the start. Now we’re going to speed run some of the bits we talked about on the Nationalist A-Team because for anyone who watched the Nationalist A-Team and enjoys it, look, it is a banger of a stream, except for when I get killed by somebody and get upset.

 

But other than that! It is a good stream. And if you want to watch it, there’s some takes there. And also there’s the Patriarch there as well who provides quite a lot of good comedy.

 

Anyway, so we’re going to start with the wider justification for this because there’s nowhere better to start than the official justification. Now, I’ve seen these videos where Netanyahu, they’re sort of like compilation videos of every time Netanyahu is claimed that Iran is sort of five months, five weeks, you know, two years from getting the atomic bomb. And he’s been doing this, believe it or not, for over 30 years!

 

So the first example I’ve seen of Netanyahu saying that Iran is just moments away from like nuclear weapon capability was actually all the way back in 1995. And the reason that’s interesting, …

 

Yuro: There are people dying in this war on the American side who have not been alive longer than Iran was supposedly two weeks away from a nuclear weapon!

 

Mark Collett: That’s a very good point. That is Yuro. But you get minus points for butting in. You’ve been told about that.

 

Natty: Oh, no [word unclear] battalion!

 

Mark Collett: Wiffle bat to give you a spanking. Right. So these fake nuclear claims that are interesting for two reasons.

 

Firstly, because they are blatantly fake! It’s been, to my knowledge, 31 years. And Yuro does make, … Look to Yuro’s credit, he makes a very good point. You know, the idea that this has been going on longer than some of the people on these American battleships have been alive is incredible!

 

But one thing that struck me immediately with this was I remember living through the time of the Iraq war. And at the time of the Iraq war, Weapons of Mass Destruction became one of the most maligned phrases to have ever been used in British Parliament, to the point that where if you now say “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, it’s sort of synonymous with war crimes, lies and a regime that took us into what was essentially an illegal war. You know, there was no Weapons of Mass Destruction.

 

But one thing that shocks me is this is the kind of thing where people just seem to have either forgotten this or put it to one side.

 

So the Daily Mail is a classic example of this. The Daily Mail is sort of the populist Right-wing, you know, vote Reform, consider voting Conservative newspaper. And they were all against Blair and the Weapons of Mass Destruction and exposing his lies and speaking out about it once it was exposed via the Chilcot inquiry.

 

But now the Daily Mail, like:

 

“We need this war. You know, usually we’re against war, but in this instance, this needs to happen!”

 

And you’ve got all these shill commenters in the sections underneath the Daily Mail articles in the comment sections, and they’re all saying things like:

 

“Oh, I’m against the war, but this is an exception.”

 

And I don’t know whether these are real people, idiot Boomer types or that’s not all Boomers. But you know, the sort. I mean the kind of person that says:

 

“Oh, well, I’m against the people on the small boats, but I would let the genuine refugees in all. Yes! And if somebody comes here and learns to speak English, well, he’s as British as Yorkshire pudding, isn’t he!”

 

Those sort. Is it one of them or is it a shill account?

 

[11:04]

 

But I think it’s really interesting that exactly the same justification for the attack is being used, as was used in Iraq. But the Iraq, War retrospectively is possibly the most maligned conflict and the conflict seen as the most unjust conflict. Probably post World War II. I’d have said that would have gone to Vietnam at one point, but Iraq seems to have, maybe because it’s more recent, seems to have eclipsed that.

 

So what do you guys think?

 

We’ll start with you, Natty. Obviously this is what they’re saying and we’re going to discuss next the real reason and what we think the real reason is. But what do you think to this sort of fake reasoning for going to war?

 

Natty: Well, just listening to you there, I haven’t done this because I was just reminded by what you said. But I’m fairly certain if you went back to the 2000s and had a look at the lead up to the Iraq war, you, amongst the Daily Mail articles, you wouldn’t find opposition to the actual war itself, because none of these publications were really opposed to it in any meaningful way and certainly weren’t like trying to rally people against the war. So you know, post Iraq war when everyone was kind of saying what disaster it was, I’m sure the Daily Mail were jumping on board that.

 

But as even now publications that you would think would be against the war in Iran are kind of talking around the edge of it whilst not decrying the war and certainly not being like anti-war, like proper anti-war publications and laying out all the connections between the Epstein regime and the people connecting in it like Mandelson and like Boris Johnson and Tony Blair and all the rest of it.

 

But yeah, it’s striking. I mean, one of the things I put in the chat earlier was that before this happened. Well, okay, let’s let me take it back a little bit. Before Iraq, the reason why the term “Weapons of Mass Destruction” became such a big thing is because the media and the government, Blair’s regime spent so much time and energy trying to get public approval for it, because they felt like, they obviously felt like they needed it. They needed a justification. They needed something to sell to the British people as to why it was a good idea, why it was necessary to go into Iraq.

 

Now that just hasn’t happened this time. Because I think they understand that the forces controlling the “Epstein Empire” as people are calling it, which is fairly apt, simply are not in the shadows anymore. You know, this stuff has been laid out. Israel is pulling the strings and it’s pulling the strings of America and it’s America’s pulling the strings of Europe because essentially Europe is just a colony of the United States. So they don’t feel they need to justify it so much.

 

Now, obviously there’s like regime mouthpieces and stoolies like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray, the Daily Mail and all the rest of it, who are now going out there and running cover and trying to make this war popular or make it so that it seems like:

 

“Well, it’s not a job any of us want to do, but it’s necessary and we need to do this for stability and peace!”

 

But I just don’t think the public are buying it. And the public for the most part didn’t buy it with Iraq, but that doesn’t stop that happening. And they’re not buying it with Iran either.

 

But there hasn’t been a groundswell of opposition to it in the same way as Iraq because they haven’t spent so long trying to justify it. And for a lot of people this just came out the blue. Not for anyone who’s kind of a properly dissident to the kind of Epstein Empire. This didn’t come out of the blue. This was fairly predictable. But probably just for your average person sitting at home and getting on with life, this kind of immediate blow up in the Middle East, where oil prices are about to skyrocket, petrol prices creeping up and we’re probably about to experience an energy crisis, just came out straight out of the blue! And the justifications, unlike Iraq, are all post hoc. They, it wasn’t a media build up to a war, it’s like a media cover plot after the war has started.

 

Yuro: What I find interesting as well is as you say, with the Iraq thing, there was a lot of build up and there was:

 

“Let’s get the UN involved, let’s condemn them, let’s build a coalition, let’s get Britain involved.”

 

But the other thing is they never said Iraq has a nuke. It was always this nebulous “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. And it’s kind of like the, well, we’re going to say that they have Weapons of Mass Destruction and that’s like we will say:

 

“Oh, actually they have chemical weapons which we’re going to classify as Weapons of Mass Destruction. And we’re going to hope that we can gin that up in people’s minds to be like, ‘Oh, they have a nuclear weapon’.”

 

And it was like:

 

“We won’t explicitly state they have a nuclear weapon. We’ll just try and make people think they have a nuclear weapon.”

 

And then there was the thing about:

 

“They can strike us in 45 minutes with their Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

But now they just come out and say:

 

“They’re building a nuke!”

 

It’s not Weapons of Mass Destruction. And as you say, that’s because the term is just completely lost all validity. You know, people at the moment, they hear that, they just know it’s Iraq, War 2. But they’re not even like trying to do that lesser thing.

 

It’s kind of like what they do with racism, where you’ve got like the small definition and the big definition. The Weapons of Mass Destruction is like what they do with racism.

 

So if you’re a “racist”, it’s like you just think that different people are different and you care about your own people. Well, that’s a racist. But the moment you get labelled a racist, it’s like you’re a “supremacist who wants to murder everyone who’s not you”. Well, the Weapons of Mass Destruction is chemical weapons could be a weapon of mass destruction, but the moment you get labelled with that, all of a sudden:

 

“You’ve got nukes, you’re dangerous!”

 

[17:31]

 

Natty: Yeah. And the 45 minute claim was like, they can hit the tip of Cyprus. If they drive a Scud launcher right to the edge of the Iraqi border and fire it, they might just be able to hit Cyprus! And that was translated into British headlines as “British territory”. Yeah:

 

“They can hit us in 45 minutes! Oh my God, the sky’s falling!”

 

And the reality was, it was Scud missiles and some Sarin gas artillery shells which have a range of about 10 or 15 kilometers, which they used in Halabja [1988 against Kurds] apparently. I mean, we saw, I, we got trained on that in the CBRA regiment of what happened in Halabja with the Sarin gas shells. But that was passed into, like you said, Weapons of Mass Destruction. Very nebulous. Well, not easy to disseminate term, but very little detail and very little meaning. And you could say to people:

 

“Well, they’ve got Scud launches on trucks which can fly however many kilometers it is, and they’ve got some Sarin gas shells.”

 

But these, in terms of where the United Kingdom is and the rest of Europe, these are absolutely meaningless! And again, it was just to justify the Greater Israel Project and take out one of Israel’s enemies and destroy one of Israel’s enemies.

 

Yuro: Well, I was having to think about this before we started this stream. And I said to myself, you know:

 

“There is one state, there is a rogue state in the Middle East that has Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

 

And by that I mean a boatload of actual nuclear weapons. And they have the capability of targeting Britain, …

 

Natty: And if rumours are to be believed, then the Samson Option is a real thing and Israel is the lunatic state that has no compunction about using these things. Now, I don’t know if that’s a real thing or whether that’s just something that gets disseminated to scare everyone.

 

But you’ve got to remember the only people who have used nukes as an actual weapon of war against living targets is the Epstein Regime in the Second World War. And I don’t separate the people who are running America now from those people. I mean, it’s the same group of people.

 

Yuro: If you look at the way that they behave on the world stage, the way that they behave against the Palestinians, the way that they behave against the Iranians, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to just lash out at everyone else for “not defending them hard enough”. But according to the publicly available information, they have intercontinental ballistic missiles with a range of 11 and a half thousand kilometers, which basically means they can hit everywhere on the planet with the exception of kind of east Australia, New Zealand and some bits of South America.

 

Natty: So those parts of South America where all the Nazis fled to, so unfortunately they [chuckling] can’t touch them!

 

Yuro: The parts where Javier Milei, who’s converted to Judaism, is currently in charge.

 

Natty: Oh no!

 

Yuro: And they might also not be able to quite hit Mexico where (((Claudia Sheinbaum))) is in charge.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, dear! Well, talking about the control that jews wield, let’s talk about what we think is the real reason for this.

 

Now, I’m going to go straight out and say it. I believe the real reason for this is the Greater Israel Project. I think the Greater Israel Project is something that has gathered pace in the last few years, especially under Trump. We’ve seen the attacks on Gaza, we’ve seen the attacks on Lebanon. We’ve seen the fall of the Syrian regime, which was obviously heavily influenced by Israel, who were helping Islamic terrorists in the region. You know, the head chopper ones that we’re told are the great threat to peace and justice and decency, yet Israel is actually supporting those people!

 

And we’ve also seen Israel be involved in the fall of other regimes. Israel were famously involved. And this came out in the Chilcot Inquiry. I actually did a video on this. Israel were very famously involved with meeting, … And Tony Blair admitted this under oath in the Chilcot Inquiry. He met influential jewish leaders from the then current Israeli regime. And he said:

 

“The meetings had nothing to do with military intelligence. They had everything to do with overall strategy and long term goals.”

 

So take that as you will. But I’m taking that as they were heavily involved in getting rid of Saddam Hussein.

 

[22:24]

 

And I think it’s obviously within Israel’s interest to topple almost every sovereign regime in the region. And they do this quite openly. They are doing it more openly now. They’re getting away with it, sadly. And this is a blatant example of that. Although they’ve loosely talked about the nuke thing, like we said, Natty did make an important point that they felt it’s less necessary to sell this like they sold the Iraq, War. And in some interviews, members of the American regime have simply said:

 

“Yeah, we just want to kill these people. We want to kill them, we want to take them out. This is about regime change. This is about Israel.”

 

And I believe it was Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, who said:

 

“It was Israel who forced our hand. They began this and we are there to defend them and assist them. So when they began the attacks, we were forced into going along with it.”

 

Now, Trump then furiously denied this, but it’s a very interesting admission from Marco Rubio.

 

So I think this is all about the Greater Israel Project. And I believe that has been the driving force or the driving ideology behind the destabilisation of the Middle East.

 

Natty: Yeah, totally! And it kind of behooves me to say this and to get people to realise that whereas we’re living kind of day to day and prices of things go up and you’re worried about your children. We’ve been totally separated from any idea of our history and our lineage and where we’ve come from and where we might be going.

 

So it’s kind of hard to understand for us the jewish mindset. And this is a plan that’s been in the making for a very long time, years, decades, where once Israel was created and they have a vision of the Greater Israel Project. There’s a whole, there’s a list of countries. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt. And through various machinations, they’ve all been, one by one, they’ve been taken out or pacified. Egypt is basically paid off by the United States and is under the sway of Israel, has a border with Israel, but it doesn’t do anything about their genociding of the Palestinians and the destabilising and eventual collapse of the Syrian state. What happened in Libya with Gaddafi ending up with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street, and the subsequent flooding of Europe with migrants, which is a kind of side issue we can get onto if you want. But all of this, …

 

Mark Collett: I’ve got that further down the line, mate, that comes at the end, if you look at the show notes, I’ve actually said:

 

“You know, what are the actual repercussions for this, both for the West and for the Middle East?”

 

And that’s one of the things we will talk about.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. And it’s clear now, I mean, in my opinion and the opinion of other people who have been following this, that the reason Trump was so heavily pushed into a second term was that the people who are running him and the jews in Israel believe that he was the best chance of getting this done. You know, this final push to topple Iran, which basically gets rid of the last bastion of resistance to Israel. And you’ve got to think:

 

“Well, why is Israel so hell bent on getting rid of people who resist them?”

 

You think, well, the people who are opposing them, the only real people who are opposing them, committing genocide in Gaza, Europe was on board with it. The United States was supplying them with bombs and had carrier groups in the Mediterranean. The United Kingdom, our own government, was flying surveillance flights over Gaza and letting Cyprus be used as a refueling and an air base for Israel. So Europe was aiding in the genocide in Gaza.

 

And it was only Hezbollah and you know, funded via Iran that was really attacking, and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who were attacking Israel and trying to hold them account for genociding the Gazan people. And that’s unacceptable for Israel to have that resistance in the region, even though the attacks on it are totally justified and being used as like, defense against people who are being hurt and destroyed in this like, brutal way by this lunatic, lunatic group of people who have been squatting on the edge of a Mediterranean.

 

So the justifications the real justification is the toppling of Iran as a coherent state. And I’ll touch on this before I pass this over to Yuro. But there’s talk of regime change. You know, that’s what they say:

 

“We’re trying to enact regime change here.”

 

But that isn’t quite true. They’re not really interested in a regime swap where they swap one regime for another. What they’re interested in is total destabilisation! Just like with Syria, just like with Iraq, just like with Libya, where these are just failed states with tribal warlords with like Mossad and CIA run groups running around HTS, ISIS, all of these people. Which means no coherent defense, no missile bases, no civil defense, nothing! Just a load of groups that you can pay this group to fight this group and you know, you can pay these guys or stop paying these guys and just let chaos reign while Israel just expands and expands and expands and gets to do what it wants.

 

You know, kind of reminiscent, I’ll just finish on this. Kind of reminiscent to how if you import millions and millions of foreign people into a small island nation, it also becomes destabilised and coherent resistance or coherent defense or coherent politics kind of become very difficult and a very well motivated minority can rule the lot! So there’s your answer as to the real reasons for this war.

 

[28:45]

 

 

Yuro: A few things I wanted to pick up on there. Just as Mark was speaking, you kept using the term “regime”. And that’s like one of those MKUltra trigger words that they’ve put in people’s minds that like “regime is bad, regime is authoritarian, evil government”. It was all it was always the “Saddam regime” and the “Iran regime”. They’re just governments. They’re a different form of government. You know some of them are more or less Democratic than others, but it’s like this regime thing is a trigger word. And along that same lines, Natty, you mentioned the Houthis as “rebels”. I think the ones that we call Houthis are pretty much just the government of Yemen now. I mean, and they have pockets of what’s left of the people that they overthrew. But they’re basically just the government of Yemen. They’re not rebels anymore. They’re not a regime, they’re just that government.

 

But obviously this was all part of a plan. This is something that they’ve been going at for a very long time. They had the Project for a New American Century [PNAC] where they said we want to hit like seven countries in 10 years. And they’ve basically got all of them.

 

I mean, they wanted to get Iraq, they wanted to get Syria, they wanted to get Libya, and of course it’s neocon jews behind it all.

 

So that’s been happening for a very long time. There’s a reason why they caught a bunch of jewish Israelis dancing on 911*, already filming before the first plane went into those towers. They were dancing around, they were happy because they knew that was the excuse that they needed to start their own genocidal campaign. And it’s like dominoes falling. They get this one, then they get that one. And I mean, what happens to Libya? He, Gaddafi, gave up his weapons, chemical weapons and things like that.

 

[* 9/11: A false flag carried out by ZOG with Israel being the lead behind its planning and execution. The aim was to unleash the War OF Terror on the countries around Israel, among other aims. See See Also links below, especially the work by Christopher Bollyn.]

 

And as soon as they were gone, they were like:

 

“Right, well he’s defenseless, we can go in there and kill him now!”

 

So that’s what they proceeded to do.

 

And the other thing as well, like looking at what they’re doing to Iran, I mean, you talked about them wanting to destabilise them. As far as I understand, because they can’t really hit these military targets. They don’t know exactly where all the underground bases are and where they’re being launched from. So they’re targeting, I mean, apart from like primary schools for girls and things like that, which they do just because they’re evil and want to blow up kids when they’re not abusing kids in other ways, they’re just like targeting police stations and things like that. Just like blow up all the police stations in the country and hope it destabilises that way!

 

And of course they had this gayop a few weeks ago, maybe a month ago now, where they tried to incite some sort of terrorist uprising in Iran and that failed.

 

And obviously they wanted to coincide these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: But I was going to say that was obviously hilariously mistimed. [chuckling] Right? So they fermented this terrorist uprising and meanwhile they haven’t got all like the military assets in place to strike it. I mean, you might have a better idea of this than me, you guys, but maybe they thought in the January uprisings that they like funded all these terrorist groups to try and overthrow the government of Iran. Maybe they thought that it was still going to be going on now while they moved all these carrier groups and pulled their troops out of the Gulf oil state bases. Maybe they thought it was still going to be going on and that the Iran government was still going to be fighting these guys, but it was crushed within like a few days. Right!

 

Yuro: I have a feeling that maybe they were trying to like wait a little bit longer, but it was about to be compromised and they thought:

 

“If we don’t do it now, we miss the opportunity entirely.”

 

So they had to launch it. And they spent so long getting carriers into place to attack Iran because they’ve had these problems with the sewage system on the Gerald Ford, which obviously some people are saying that’s like a deliberate thing, that soldiers or sailors have clogged the tubes on purpose to destroy the system because they don’t want to go and die and be the next false flag. But they’ve had problems with that before. So it’s not entirely out of the realms of possibility that it is sort of coincidental to some degree.

 

But yeah, obviously that was something that delayed them. So I mean we can be glad about that because it’s meant that Iran’s not facing these two things at the same time.

 

Natty: I’m not sure. Look, I’m not a, like a military analyst or anything, but I’m not sure even if the like Epstein empire, the Epstein regime, had fermented this terrorist uprising whilst they carried out this first strike against Khomeini in a little girl’s school for some reason, whether if those two things occurred, coincided, even then, whether they’d have been able to pull off this kind of toppling of the regime. It seems like, …

 

Yuro: Regime?

 

Natty: Look, [chuckling] it’s the word everyone uses here! I can try, but I’m as susceptible to the MKUltra* terms as everyone else. Right? I’m just not sure it would have worked even if they had pulled it off at the same time.

 

[* MKUltra was a covert program run by the CIA from 1953 to 1973. Its primary goal was to explore methods of mind control and behavior modification through various means, including drugs and psychological techniques. MKUltra is widely condemned for its unethical practices, including: Lack of Consent: Many subjects were unaware they were part of experiments. Abusive Techniques: Included torture, isolation, and drugging without consent. The term MKUltra is a CIA cryptonym: “MK” is an arbitrary prefix standing for the Office of Technical Service and “Ultra” is an arbitrary word out of a dictionary used to name this project.]

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’re going to go on to that anyway, so let’s move a little bit further forward because there are other things we want to talk about.

 

Now, I think the next thing we need to talk about, we’ve placed this into context, talk about the Greater Israel Project. Now I think the next thing that’s very important is discussing the issue of these fake negotiations that America has had with the likes of Iran before all of this kicked off.

 

And they obviously had similar sort of fake negotiations with, I think it was Venezuela, didn’t they? And then they go in anyway. This is something that America started doing, you know, fake negotiations, but then we come and get you anyway.

 

[35:06]

 

Yuro: I think they had a similar thing with the, like Hezbollah and Hamas, didn’t they?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, there’s multiple examples.

 

But what I’m getting at is a real, and we won’t labour this because we spoke about this extensively on the Nationalist A-Team the other night, but when we were talking about that, we did make the point that fundamentally at one point the idea of going in somewhere you know, negotiating, but then using negotiations as a reason or as an excuse to then hit another country. So the negotiations aren’t real negotiations. They’re cover that gets the other side to drop their guard. So, it’s like walking up somebody in a bar saying:

 

“Look, mate, let’s just settle this amicably. Let me buy you a drink. What do you want?”

 

And when the other guy turns to have a look at the list of craft beers, you sucker punch him! You know, that’s an underhanded thing to do. Everyone would be like:

 

“Wow, that’s pretty much scandalous! We don’t want to see that kind of behaviour. That’s the kind of behaviour that’s not becoming of an honourable man.”

 

And there used to be this narrative that the West was honourable, that we were the good guys. And I’ll say these fake negotiations are being used as a means to cover up an attack which is I’m imminent. I do think that is a really shady thing to do.

 

And I think that as time goes by, we are going to see more and more people be unwilling to negotiate with the West. Like, why would Vladimir Putin or China or any other nation, North Korea, negotiate with Trump? Why would any foreign leader trust going to America or sitting in a negotiation room with the Americans when they assassinate leaders, carry out fake negotiations, use the hand of friendship to lock their opponent’s hand in place before they sucker punch them? You know, it’s like holding one hand out to shake the other guy’s hand and when he starts giving the handshake, you just sucker punch them! You know, it’s awful! I mean, what do you guys think to this?

 

I think this is going to fundamentally change the way, the implication of this, is going to change the way that every other nation does business with America. And it’ll put America on a even people like the Europeans, who are essentially vassal states of America, are not going to be trusting of Trump again or America.

 

Yuro: Well, Europe is already not going to be trusting of Trump and America because of the whole thing with Greenland for a start. But I mean, I hope at the end of this, obviously Iran’s going to hold out. They’re going to continue to resist until America and Israel, …

 

Mark Collett: This is the summation, what you hope for comes at the end, like, stay on, …

 

Yuro: It’s related to this! It’s related to this. I was going to say I hope that Israel and America run out of interceptor missiles. Iran fights them to a standstill. And they say:

 

“Right, we will negotiate with Trump in this place.”

 

He goes there to negotiate, and then, …

 

Natty: They just blow him up! [chuckling]

 

Yuro: And it would be entirely justified on moral grounds and on the grounds that it’s already been done to them.

 

Natty: They would cry bitter tears if the same tactics they had used, these same underhand, cowardly, sniveling, weak tactics were used on them! And this is something to point out to. I say I’m gonna use Boomer, but, like, Boomer mindset, Civnat, kind of Tommy Robinson-tard mindset where like:

 

“Oh, yeah, no, we’re the good guys and we should stamp these dirty terrorists into the ground! They’re terrorists!”

 

It’s like your pedo jew empire assassinates little girls for some reason, I guess because they’ve just got bloodlust and we can talk about the Purim Fest, if we want. Assassinates little girls, assassinates world leaders, which is supposed to be off the table. Totally violates, like, any notion of the Geneva Convention or the kind of rules of war and does it in a cowardly way. This is like your medieval knight marching out to the front of a battle under a white flag to negotiate terms and then just pulling a knife and stabbing the negotiator. Your entire army would be, they’re like, forfeit. And the enemy army would be totally justified in just slaughtering prisoners and like, just pillaging and doing whatever it wants at that stage! You’ve set the rules. You’re supposed to be the powerful, the one who’s setting out exactly how things are going to go down. And you open the conflict or the latest round of the conflict with an underhand cowardly assassination under the flag of truce and blowing up 170 schoolgirls! Well, I’m sorry, but what space have you now given for quarters? None! And no one’s going to trust you, and they shouldn’t trust you.

 

And the other world powers looking on Russia and China, who we’re going to touch on in a little while, like Mark said, they’re not going to be trustworthy. They’re going to have that in their minds anytime America tries to talk to them, anytime the jew empire reaches out to say:

 

“Oh, we just want to discuss the Ukraine war and negotiate terms in the Ukraine war.”

 

And like, Yuro said, they would be totally justified in shooting down like diplomatic planes, like bombing, like delegations, peace delegations, assassinating the head of state. Who’s to tell anyone now that that is a wrong or immoral thing to do now that supposedly the world police and a global superpower and the most moral army in the world, Israel, has carried out exactly that, such a thing.

 

And I don’t need to belabour the point, but they’ve been doing this for a long time. And you can look back as far as Dresden and the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan, to say:

 

“Well, that’s how these people act! And people who oppose them should act accordingly and plan accordingly.”

 

[41:35]

 

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree. And not only this or not only what you guys have said, but I do think it’s very interesting that on top of everything you guys have said, there is also the issue of Russia and Zelensky.

 

Now obviously if Russia had wanted to, they could have bombed Kiev, day one of the conflict and absolutely just beheaded the regime. Now Russia never did that. Now I’m not saying Russia are the good guys or shilling for Russia, but it is an interesting comparison to see that everything that Russia has been accused of, the West has done and the West has done it in a much more sort of egregious fashion. It’s quite interesting.

 

And this so-called “Axis of Evil” now appears to be far less evil than the “good guys”. The “good guys” have shown, I said that in inverted commas. Have shown their hand. They’ve, it’s a mask off moment. I don’t know if anyone wants to add something to this because we did talk about this a lot, but I’ll give you the chance to follow up if anyone wants to talk about this.

 

Natty: Yeah, go on. Yuro, you go first.

 

Yuro: I was just gonna say it’s a complete moral inversion. It’s, we are supposedly the good guys because we fight against the bad guys. And they’re all terrorists. They’re inherently evil. I was listening to, I think this was on the Daily Shoah they were talking about basically the term “terrorist” is a social construction. It’s just a word we can use to label somebody and all of a sudden their grievances illegitimate. We don’t have to stick to the rules of engagement. We can just murder them, we can murder their families and put them in jail. We just put this label on them and they are inherently evil.

 

But you know, the Ayatollah was never in the Epstein files. That’s the difference.

 

Natty: Yeah, the Ayatollah never called me a goyim or demographically replaced my people or ethnically cleansed my people. So you know, what beef do I have with the Ayatollah, at this point? And like Mark was saying, the Russians opened Ukraine, the Ukraine conflict by striking out military targets. They were landing at Hostomel Airport and controlling like major supply routes. And the Jewpedo regime starts its war with an assassination of a leader, or a spiritual leader. Not a military strategist or anything like that. A spiritual leader who’s in his 80s as well as his granddaughter and his family members all blown up. And like blowing up a school with 12 to 17 year old school girls in it. Now you tell me, yeah, you tell me who the bad guys are.

 

Yuro: It’s worth pointing out as well that the entire war in Ukraine or although it was something that had been kind of slowly building up for a while, that NATO had been expanding further and further eastward, it was really brought to the fore because Russia was supporting Assad in Syria. And the Epstein empire had to take out Syria in order to stop Iranian weapons getting to Hezbollah and getting to Gaza.

 

And so they started this whole other conflict to take Russia’s focus away from helping their allies in Syria. And that allowed them to get in there and destroy Syria. And it’s all part of the same program.

 

Natty: The same grand strategy. Yeah, I think people, a lot of people kind of don’t seem to understand that. They’re like:

 

“Well that seems, that seems too far fetched that the Pedojew regime would start a war with Russia in Ukraine just to help topple the Syrian government. Or the Pedo jew regime would kidnap a South American president just to support an ongoing or like support a future war against Iran with oil, you know, oil routes and all the rest of it.”

 

Because people are like:

 

“No, that can’t be right, you know, 50,000 Ukrainian men dead and God knows how many Russian men dead just to tie up Russian forces to leave Syria exposed?”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, that’s how these people think. That’s what they’re willing to do.”

 

And that’s what they did do. And in Syria, Russian troops, Russian air power in Syria was halting Israeli aggression and you know, Western aggression. It was the CIA, it was MI6 and was Mossad, was paying ISIS, which has now become HTS, which is basically ISIS, to mess up Syria and mess with Assad and sanctions on Assad’s government that was turning the place inhospitable. Making it so that just to live there was pain and it wasn’t the government was obviously suffering and trying its best, but the people suffer when you put sanctions on a country. So on behest of like jewish paedophiles and Israel, America just makes people’s lives a misery around the world, everywhere! You know, Ukrainian men dead, Syrian families wiped out, little girls in Iran, hundreds of thousands of civilians everywhere, in Iraq, in Gaza, in Libya, all dead! Because jewish paedophiles just cannot get enough blood.

 

Yuro: And until the extent that they have any support for the Israeli regime in places like the UK, people in the UK who support Israel, they see this as a war against the Muslims. And they hate Muslims because of what gangs of Pakistani men do to White girls after jewish people like Peter Mandelson and his friend Tony Blair, people like that brought them to our country.

 

And it works for them both ways because it destroys the youth of the British people. It destroys our homogeneous country. It creates resentment against Muslims which they can then use and say:

 

“Well, don’t you hate the Muslims, you hate the Pakistanis who are raping children over here!”

 

[48:08]

 

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“Live vicariously as we bomb them in the Middle East. Oh, we’re getting those dirty Muslims for you know, goyim! Don’t worry, we’re bombing them. You love it, don’t you? Rah, rah, ra! Let’s go Israel! Israel’s defending you! If we weren’t fighting them here, you’d be fighting them in your streets!”

 

Well, how? Okay, thanks, Schlomo. How did they get onto my streets in the first place? Anyone fancy answer that, answering that question?

 

Mark Collett: No, that’s a very good point. Now obviously we discussed that.

 

So when we discussed the Ayatollah being killed, we’ve discussed the schoolgirls being killed. I mean, know, as you said, the paedophiles are now murdering children. And this says something about America and Israel.

 

Now, I don’t think this was an accident. I don’t think that school being hit was in any way an accident. I think they did that on purpose. I think that’s the sort of people that they are. I think they do things like this because it pleases them to do things like this. And it pleases them to do things like this because to them this is they could avoided doing this, but they don’t want to avoid doing this. What they want to do is they want to cause as much hurt and pain as possible. Now these missile systems that they have, they are probably the best missile systems in the world. They understand where they can strike and where they can’t strike. Those missiles are pretty damn accurate.

 

So when they hit a school, I think that’s by some sort of sick design. I don’t believe it’s accidental. I don’t know if you guys want to add anything to that.

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a term called “sub-metre accuracy” and I think Tomahawk missiles, I’m not sure about JDAMs, but certainly Tomahawk missiles and the types of missiles that the Jewpedo regime uses all have sub-metre accuracy.

 

So the claims about:

 

“Well, this girl school was next to a Iranian military base or something.”

 

These munitions have sub-metre accuracy, which means they can target within a metre, which is where they drop these bombs. I mean, are we supposed to pretend that the Pedojew regime is somehow like squeamish about blowing up children and civilians? A regime that goes out of its way to target hospitals and suburbs and then when it’s blown up the hospitals and suburbs, then blows up the tent cities that spring up around it to house all the refugees and injured people that you’ve just like totally displaced.

 

So these people are not squeamish about killing civilians then. They never have been. They never have been. Not for the last 70 years and probably not before that.

 

Yuro: We’re always told that we have the most advanced, precise, ultra accurate munitions. We can take out a terrorist in a crowd without killing anyone else:

 

“Oh, look, we dropped a bomb dead centre on that school. Total accident! We don’t know how it happened!”

 

Do you remember when they were attacking Gaza? I mean they’re always attacking Gaza, but in particular in the aftermath of October 7th and there were various organisations that went there to try to provide food relief and they had a car with a big logo on the top that says, “Food Kitchen”. It’s a non-governmental organisation, it’s a charity that’s bringing food to starving people in Gaza. And they sent a munition. It’s like a missile, but instead of a bomb, it’s got just like razor blades all around it.

 

And you can see the picture of the car, they sent it straight through the roof, directly on top of the driver’s seat and cut that man to bits! That’s how accurate they can be when they want to be. So they have the ability to do that they have the ability to do it. It is not an accident when they, …

 

Natty: The other interesting thing about the strike on the girls school was in the immediate aftermath, like there were shills online, there were online shills and righttoids and jews and all sorts of like scum coming out the woodwork claiming again, like they used to do in Gaza or like they have done in Gaza, that:

 

“Oh, this was an Iranian missile that kind of missed a target or misfired as they fired it out of Tehran and fell back on the girl school.”

 

Which was utterly disproved! And yet, you know, none of the people who were claiming this was like an Iranian misfire will ever be held to account or ever be made to apologise or made to like confront their lies about what this was. So the misinformation is hot and heavy.

 

But if you think, like I said, I’m going to reiterate this, if you think the Pedojew regime is squeamish about blowing up children, you’re mistaken. They’re not squeamish about blowing them up. Probably the only disappointing thing for the Pedojew regime is that these girls were blown up and didn’t have a chance to be like, sent off to Epstein’s island or something like that.

 

[53:08]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. The next thing is, this is quite interesting because it’s not the first time that Israel have admitted to bombing civilian populations. And we’ve discussed that they did it in Lebanon. They do it quite indiscriminately, they do it in Gaza.

 

But one thing’s quite interesting about these particular bombings and you guys made the point that they were bombing police stations. And I think they believe that they bombed police stations and took out government leaders and spiritual leaders, that there was going to be a revolution. And we’ve constantly heard this nonsense in the West, haven’t we? That the Iranian regime is hideously unpopular, that normal people in Iran hate the Ayatollah, they hate the government, the police, every organ of the state. I’d actually say more people in Britain hate Keir Starmer than people in Iran hate the Ayatollah.

 

But one thing that’s been very interesting is post these strikes and these indiscriminate missile attacks on schools, police stations and other sites around Tehran, we’ve seen more people out in the street supporting the Iranian government and wanting to fight back against America. I think that really underlines the fact that this idea that the Iranian people are all kept down, they have the Ayatollah’s boot on their head, this is nothing more than propaganda.

 

Natty: Oh, of course! It’s quite interesting to juxtapose it.

 

Can you imagine like a protest, or a march with hundreds of thousands of people ever coming out for any European government? I mean, the closest you got in the West was Trump, right? And that is quickly turned to ash in a lot of people’s mouths. He’s been exposed as basically just another neocon.

 

But if you put yourself in the shoes of like an Iranian, a normal Iranian citizen who’s just watched every single country where his kind of ethnic people, I know that Persians are maybe looked at differently than other people are on the Gulf states, whatever. All the other countries around him who aren’t in league with Israel have been like, brutally broken up and just left as failed states. Well, you’re going to want to cling to anything that stands up to these people and anything that resists being destroyed by them, because you know that if your government falls, that’s the end of any semblance of stability or normality you’ve got. You’re just going to have to either flee or deal with a failed state of a nation. So, of course they support it!

 

And you listen to like the BBC or Piers Morgan or some of these shows and you would think that, …

 

Mark Collett: Andrew Neil!

 

Natty: Yeah, he’s the worst! He’s a total Zio boot licker, man! I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen! [LOL] But like, you listen to these people and you’d think that every single person in Iran is just waiting, crouched behind their door, ready to rise up and take out this hugely unpopular government that everyone hates.

 

And like you said, there’s no government in Europe or anywhere in the West that is as popular with its people as the Iranian government. So take that as you will.

 

Yuro: Obviously, you know, Iran, I mean, I’m guessing, but much like most of the Middle East is awash with weapons from previous gayops and plans that we’ve had to overthrow them in the past.

 

But if you turn this around and let’s say some foreign actor blew up Parliament with every MP in it and blew up every diversity police station across the country and just dropped a bunch of weapons the chance of having a revolution would be much more likely here than it ever would be over there!

 

Natty: Yeah. And just to add on to this point, funnily enough, the strikes on Bahrain, and Bahrain’s a tiny little island nation. I mean, it used to be part of Iran. But the strikes on Bahrain look like they might actually foment a revolution because they’re kind of the Pedojew empire installed monarchy in Bahrain has lost its grip thanks to the Americans retreating and the actual people in Bahrain absolutely hate their rulers. And possibly, you know, news blackout and all the rest of it might actually foment a popular revolution in Bahrain and change governments there, [chuckling] which is supposed to be like a stronghold for the American empire and the Epstein regime and the headquarters of the Fifth Fleet, which controls the Persian Gulf or it used to control the Persian Gulf until the Pedojew regime started this war. So yeah, good one, guys. How’s it going? How’s this war going for you?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I would say that you’ve got a very good point there. And it’s a good point because we are moving on to how is this war going? Well, this is the interesting thing. Trump was elected as the guy who was going to be the President of peace and he was also elected on this America First ticket.

 

The idea that he was going to look after the average American. Now since Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, we’ve seen sort of panic buying. Oil prices have spiked. This is something that isn’t helping normal Americans who are already struggling with Trump’s idiotic tariffs.

 

And I would say, for Trump, when you actually look at, you say, how’s it going for him personally? It’s not going well domestically, but his approval ratings are at an all time low. They’re actually beneath his previous approval ratings for his first term and actually beneath Biden’s approval ratings. Now he’s getting savaged.

 

Now obviously he’s going out on TV:

 

“Oh, none of these mean anything. This is rubbish! The people love me!”

 

And I’ve spoken about this before. Post World War II don’t think any Western leader has built a cult of personality as intense as Trump has done with the MAGA movement. Trump has truly built a cult of personality where people see him as the supreme leader.

 

But I think that can be a good thing and it can be a bad thing! It’s a good thing because you have a dedicated support base. It’s a bad thing because often you become insulated and you only listen to that dedicated support base. And because you have that insulation, because you have that ring of people cheering you on and like:

 

“Up Trump! Yeah, you’re doing it right! You’re getting it right! Donald’s got it perfect! Bomb them all!”

 

You don’t actually hear the people outside of your immediate circle. And I think Trump has got this wrong. I think this is going to bring more misery on normal Americans. And I also think it could cost the Republicans the midterm.

 

[1:00:51]

 

 

Yuro: I don’t think Trump got this wrong. I think Trump did this because his handlers wanted him to do this. I mean, was it Marco Rubio who basically came out and said Israel told us they were going to attack and when they attacked, we were going to get hit in response, so we just had to join them, basically, the tail wags the dog. We had to join in. They forced our hand.

 

And of course, Trump’s all over the Epstein files. He’s part of the Epstein class. He is part of that jewish Zionist Occupied Government [ZOG]. He’s not doing it because he thinks it’s going to make him popular. He’s doing it because he is either severely compromised or that’s just his team.

 

Natty: Yeah. And to assume that Trump cares anymore, I mean, he’s not up for a third term. And if he doesn’t care, do you think the jews who are running him and the Epstein, whoever takes over from Epstein cares about Trump’s reputation or cares even less about the American people and what they want? They were just dupes who were fooled into voting for him. And you can say:

 

“Well, the 2016 Trump train.”

 

Which was a lot more based and had a lot more kind of like groundswell, Right-wing energy behind it. Well:

 

“They were tricked as well. Right?”

 

But if you fell for it again and voted for him this time, they really must despise you and just think you’re the most stupid person ever going! And it’s been proven right. I mean, Trump has now burned any credibility he’s had. This is an extremely unpopular war, but it doesn’t matter. His reputation isn’t on the line anymore, and it’s not a consideration for the people pulling his strings. They wanted this war done. Trump was their best shot of getting it done. And so they’ve got him to enact it.

 

And what we’re seeing is the fallout. And who knows where this ends? I’m sure we’re going to move on to that point. But the suffering of the American people, the suffering of European people is not any concern to these people! And you might argue that European suffering and American suffering is just a little bit of icing on their cake.

 

Yuro: This is something that they’ve wanted for decades and they’ve realised that as time’s gone on its getting less and less possible. So they’ve done it now because now is more likely than tomorrow as bad as it is and as badly as they’re doing and not winning what they want to be. If they’d waited longer, they would have had even less chance.

 

So it’s just like it’s do or die. It’s all out now because they’ve got no other choice.

 

Natty: Right. That’s what I totally agree with that.

 

And what I’m saying is the considerations that like a rational government that cared about its people would make, and there’s going to be an energy crisis, our people are going to die in this war. It’s hugely unpopular. This doesn’t benefit us in the slightest. None of that is like, none of that is in consideration. And it’s clear when you listen to people that they don’t quite understand that. And you listen to like the media class trying to justify this war and just grasping for anything.

 

Whereas like the reality, the truth, that this is purely for Israel and purely for the pedojew empire just doesn’t, it’s quite a hard pill to swallow.

 

Yuro: And as always, it’s going to affect Europe and it’s going to affect the UK so much worse than it’s going to affect America, because America has its own energy supplies.

 

Whereas, you know, Europe has been deliberately cut off from Russian energy supplies and made to not take fuel from Iran in the first place. And so Europeans are probably going to freeze this winter because of what the Americans have done or the jewish-American empire has done. Yeah.

 

Natty: Not content with cutting off via like a jewishpedo regime war with Russia. Not content with cutting off like the majority of European energy supplies. Now [chuckling] the pedojew empire now starts another war in the Gulf, which will just totally screw energy prices. And I like you guys know this, but I’m in the middle of, I’ve almost finished building my house and part of that was installing a heating system and we’ve got like a central heating system.

 

Yuro: Didn’t install a heat pump, did you?

 

Natty: We did not install a heat pump. We installed a central heating oil boiler which we needed to run up as like commissioning the system [chuckling] and like we went to fill it up the day after this started and the price of central heating oil was like 63 per litre. And the day after this thing started and Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, it went up by like 33 P per litre and it’s now at like 1 pound 33 a litre. So I know this isn’t funny because this is going to affect everyone, but it’s like these are real effects and no the people who started this war just don’t care about this. You haven’t felt this at the pumps yet, but my God, like you are going to and the whole of Europe is going to, so.

 

[1:06:19]

 

Yuro: And it will be White pensioners who freeze whilst illegal migrants can turn up the heating as much as they want in hotels and non-Whites all over will get preferential benefits and help to make sure that they’re looked after while our people suffer.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean that’s a given at this point.

 

But yeah, we’re about to be hit with this thing. I mean, unless it wraps up quickly, which is not going to happen.

 

Yuro: Even if it did wrap up tomorrow, we’d still have the price shocks. I mean this is what always happens when there’s a, like the price of oil shoots up, petrol prices shoot up, the price, …

 

Natty: Two days for it to rise. 106. Yeah, six weeks for it to creep its way back down. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: They’re very interesting points and obviously it sort of goes into what we said before about Venezuela. It puts everything into context.

 

Now one of the things that he’s really. We’re going to talk a bit about the fight back here and what Iran has done, its retaliatory strikes, but one of the most disappointing things is they talk about this Axis of Evil, but so far Russia have condemned this. I’m not sure what China have said, if anything at all, but there’s largely a wave of silence about this, isn’t there? There isn’t sort of the international, … So when Russia started their, in inverted commas. They’re not my words, but their words, “the Special Military Operation”, you know, there was this wave of condemnation from every European country about the invasion of Ukraine.

 

However, here, this so-called “Axis of Evil”, China, Russia, etc, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of pushback other than a couple of snappy press statements.

 

And I think this does tell you something about Russia and China’s ability or readiness to get involved. Now I would say China is more concerned with potentially taking Taiwan. And the knock on effects of this is, well, China will look and say:

 

“If America can take out the leadership of countries they don’t like, why can’t we do the same to Taiwan?”

 

And I think Russia is still tied up in Ukraine, which is probably by design. I think part of the issue with Ukraine was pulling Russia so deep into Ukraine that it depleted their resources in places like Syria. So regimes did fall in areas that America wanted them, America and Israel wanted them to fall.

 

But what do you think about the lack of sort of international pushback on this?

 

Yuro: It’s obvious that the Chinese and Russians are helping the Iranians in terms of intelligence gathering, satellite imagery. Supposedly the Iranian missiles use like an encrypted Chinese GPS as opposed to the American run satellites.

 

But yeah, they’re not coming out and publicly saying a lot and they could be doing a lot more kind of out in the open. And if they were really serious, the Chinese and Russians could help the Iranians develop an actual nuclear weapon to allow them to have a deterrent to defend themselves. And that could have happened, you know, within the last decade, but we don’t see them doing it.

 

Natty: Well, I made this point to mark the other day. This is where I kind of disagree with you a little bit. I think there’s only so much they can do. And Russia can’t just import a nuke into Tehran or into Iran without them asking for it. And if you’ve been paying attention, …

 

Yuro: Well, they should ask for it then!

 

Natty: Well that’s, maybe you’re right and they probably should and they probably will if they ever, if they get through this thing in one piece. But Russia has to be asked to provide that nuke. And the Ayatollah, Ayatollah Khomeini has famously had a fatwa on acquiring nuclear weapons. Which, you know, looking back to how we opened this thing puts lie to the fact that:

 

“Iran is two weeks away from having a nuke. Iran is five weeks away from having a nuke!”

 

For the last 30 years, every couple of weeks. So for one, Iran has to ask these countries for things. And I’m fairly certain that Russia is providing military assistance. You know, maybe not flashy supersonic missiles and all the rest of it, but you know it’s a short hop across the Caspian Sea for Russia to send boats and send equipment down to Tehran as much as it can. Like you said, Mark, they’re tied up in Ukraine as per the pedojew regime’s plan.

 

And like you said, Yuro. They’re using encrypted Chinese satellite data for their missiles. And I’m sure, like satellite imagery of the surrounding Gulf states and areas that Iranian like ballistic missiles and drones are hitting is provided by the Chinese.

 

So I think Russia and China understand the stakes here and understand that if Iran falls or we’re kind of at a turning point in history of the future of the Pedojew regime empire and where it stands and if it manages to pull this off and destroy Iran, then who knows what’s next? And we, I guess, we can talk about that. But for Russia and China, they probably think that actually halting the Pedojew regime here is probably a good thing to do.

 

And as much as much as they can do under the table, they’re going to do. And if it gets any hotter than that, well, who knows? But I disagree with you that they’re not helping as much as they could be.

 

Yuro: I don’t expect them to hand over a dozen nuclear weapons and say:

 

“Here you go!”

 

But why is Iran using such an antiquated air force instead of more modern Russian fighter planes, for example? Like, things like that would not be outside of the realm of possibility.

 

[1:12:38]

 

Natty: Well, because that’s not where the Iranian like, national defense has been focused. America, whatever you like to say about it, dominates the air and it always has. It has the most advanced and the most aeroplanes that it can put in the sky. You know, carrier groups all over the place, air bases all over the place. And Iran has had a long time to prepare for this. They’ve watched what’s happened around them and has decided actually our best national defense is in this missile capability and drone capability. And if Russia sent a squadron of like Su-22s or whatever the latest MIGs are, they would probably be shot down in fairly short order, which would be waste of resources.

 

So I think this idea, like I said, I think this idea that they’re not helping as much as they can is misplaced.

 

And interestingly enough, Arab Natsoc in the chat has just said Iran has a hyper fixation on self sufficiency. And he says it’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

 

And I think that’s probably correct. Like I said it’s not up to China and Russia just to unload the docks in some port somewhere. Just tons and tons of military hardware that Iran never asked for. You know, they’ve got to agree these things and they’ve got to ask for it and they’ve got to trade for it and give things away and they probably feel they don’t need to. And judging by what’s happening so far, maybe they’re right. They didn’t need it. Maybe whatever they’ve asked for, they’re utilising and anything they haven’t asked for, they don’t really need.

 

Yuro: [with a Russian accent]

 

“I’m sorry, comrade, I didn’t mean to leave that pallet of nuclear weapons. You can do what you like with them.”

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, [chuckling] I did say this in all fairness, mate, I think I did say to you it would probably, to do something like this or to create a deal of that sort you would probably actually need for the Iranian regime to fundamentally turn around and say:

 

“Look, you’re gonna have half of our country, you’re gonna have X amount of our oil production. You’re going to be able to put your own bases on our soil. You’re going to have this power over us.”

 

And then Russia or China might say:

 

“Well, this is actually worth it. Then we will put bases on your soil. This is absolutely worth it! We’re going for it. Thanks. Thanks a bunch, guys. You know, this works.”

 

But the Iranians might not actually want that they might not actually want Russia and China to have that much control over Iranian politics.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s absolutely right!

 

And if you think about it, that would turn Iran into a, like a, not exactly a vassal state, but as a, like an arm of Russia or an arm of China.

 

Whereas if they come out of this unscathed, they emerge as the regional power in the Middle East, which has much bigger implications for them and then makes them bigger on the world stage than just being an outpost of Russia or China.

 

Yuro: But they could trade on more equal terms with the North Koreans. And the North Koreans have come out and said:

 

“If they ask for a nuke, they’ll get one.”

 

Natty: Well maybe they will. I suspect the Iranian government is going to be much more looking at that idea much more favourably after this.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that is an interesting point.

 

And ultimately I’ve said this on many streams, but we are in a situation where that is the only way that you can keep America off your back. That’s the only reason North Korea didn’t fall. It’s the only reason Russia probably hasn’t been invaded or struck by the Americans. I think if Russia didn’t have nukes, undoubtedly America would have attacked them.

 

But despite them not having nukes, I will say this. I think the Iranians retaliatory strikes have been extremely impressive! But amongst those retaliatory strikes, it is noted that, because when this all started, I was thinking:

 

“Why are they bombing refineries? Why are they attacking refineries in other Arab nations? Surely that’s going to annoy potential allies. Why would they do such a thing? You know, we don’t do that, guys, because if you do, you’re going to end up being a pariah state and you know, your next door neighbours aren’t going to want to essentially work with you.”

 

And then the other day it comes out that effectively what you’re seeing here is not Iran striking these oil refineries, but the strikes on the oil refineries have been carried out by Israel!

 

So what do you think to Iran’s actual retaliation and what do you think of Israel’s rather underhanded attacks? Because, and this isn’t just theory crafting. We’ve actually seen over the last, 24 hours scores of Mossad agents being arrested around the Middle East for being involved in false flag operations in numerous Middle Eastern nations.

 

And of course, this is something that we all know happens. This is something that we all are completely aware of you know, we know that Israel is regularly involved in sort of false flag events. This is something that has happened many, many times in the past.

 

And I think it’s interesting that this is being exposed. So we’ve had the USS Liberty, [we’ve had 9/11] we’ve had bombings in the Middle East. We’ve had potential or we’ve had sort of “terror attacks” in inverted commas in numerous countries which have turned out to be the work of Israeli agents. And we’re seeing that again now.

 

So I think Iran has performed far more ably than people might have thought. Sadly, they don’t seem to be winning this. Their navy seems to be taking major hits.

 

But some of these retaliatory strikes are looking questionable, are actually the work of Israel.

 

[1:19:06]

 

 

Yuro: Well, supposedly, I mean, who’s to say that the attack on our base in Cyprus was actually carried out by Iran? Because didn’t Keir Starmer say:

 

“Oh, we won’t actually engage in hostile actions, we’ll only defend Israel with our planes!”

 

Which is, of course, kind of a schizophrenic point of view in the first place. But then all of a sudden:

 

“Oh, look, our base in Cyprus is attacked and now we can kind of get in fully without restriction.”

 

Natty: So that’s a good point. I mean, we can talk about RAF Akrotiri, but if you look at where Cyprus is on a map, any Iranian weapons, munitions, whether it’s drones or missiles or whatever, have to fly over, like directly over Israel. So there’s speculation it was like Hezbollah or possibly someone else or even maybe a, like an Israeli false flag, which is certainly possible. And who can say?

 

But it does seem like the refineries in Saudi Arabia and Qatar are Mossad operations to blow them up. With the point being to try and engage those countries on behalf of Israel to come into the war on behalf of Israel and do what they can or do more for Israel.

 

But coming back to your point, Mark, about the strikes that Iran have carried out, it’s not clear to me that they’re losing. I mean, you say it seems they’re losing. I’m not sure that’s totally true. And we spoke about this before I think a few months back on the Nationalist A-Team, where I think they’re doing much more, they’re doing a much more capable job than anyone except expected them to in the sensibility and where they’re striking.

 

So they’re hitting US bases in these Gulf oil states, you know, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And they’re forcing the Americans to retreat, which stretches their logistic lines. And like we said earlier, they may have fomented an uprising in Bahrain and they’re making these Arab states which have been paid off or controlled by Israel in some way unstable and shaky. And the Israeli installed governments and monarchs and regimes in these countries are looking incredibly shaky or shaky as you’ve just put in the chat, that you’re on shaky ground. And hitting Dubai, well, that’s just popular with everyone in the entire world. So what do you say about that?

 

Yuro: It’s kind of, it’s almost like their own kind of Samson Option, except inherently justified and not evil because they’re only going after the American bases and the people supporting the Americans and the Israelis.

 

But you know, they’ve said:

 

“If we’re attacked from here. We’re going to take this, and just kind of everything in the region, every American base.”

 

And it’s entirely justified because these countries can’t claim to be not involved:

 

“Oh yes, we’re not involved in this. We just have a base where your enemy is launching attacks on you, but we’re not involved!”

 

And then the moment Iran says:

 

“Okay, well we’re not going to attack you, we’re not going to attack your people, but we’ll take out that base.”

 

And then say Saudi Arabia:

 

“So we’re under attack, we’re being attacked.”

 

Well, no!

 

Natty: That’s American soil. That’s American soil there buddy! A totally legitimate target by anyone’s standards.

 

Yuro: I mean, it seems like Iran is taking a kind of “tank and turtle” strategy. You know, it’s like when you play a, like a strategy game and you can put a lot into units or you can just build up your base and wait for them to come to you. And it can be risky because there’s a possibility that you get overwhelmed.

 

But if you’re turtle enough you can withstand that storm and then you can turn around.

 

Mark Collett: Is Yuro the tank or the turtle? That’s the question. [chuckling]

 

Natty: Depends what he’s had to eat. [chuckling]

 

Yuro: Turtling and tanking, kind of the same thing.

 

Natty: But I think like Iran by its like geography is kind of is able to naturally turtle and the fact is that there’s so many assets that America have placed around it and like the jewpedo regime have around it. And the fact that Israel is within striking distance means it can strike effectively. And America is very powerful and has a very powerful military, but that military still has logistical concerns and still has aircraft carriers that are clogged [chuckling] with like fat Mexican sailors poo!

 

Yuro: American aircraft carriers are as full of shit as Donald Trump!

 

Natty: Well, [chuckling] yeah, agreed.

 

Mark Collett: Well that’s the thing. Look, I mean, we haven’t seen an aircraft carrier at the bottom of the Persian Gulf yet, have we? Now you might be saying:

 

“Oh well, Mark, that’s a big ask.”

 

Because Obviously, if that happened, we would actually probably see the beginning of World War III! Because at that point, I think Trump would have to put boots on the ground. It actually might be the end of him. You know, it’d be one of the other, wouldn’t it? He’d either have to put boots on the ground or it’d be the end of him. But we are yet to see an aircraft carrier effectively being scrapped.

 

Now, that doesn’t mean they’re not doing anything in retaliation, but they’re not hitting the big targets. And look, we’ve had American commentators, some of these American commentators that do these sort of big takes on these things. You hear them talking about this Axis of Resistance and saying:

 

“Oh the time will come when these hypersonic missiles are going to be putting aircraft carriers at the bottom of the Persian Gulf!”

 

We yet to see that, are we? I mean, we’re also yet to see any of these sort of hypersonic super weapons take out leading members of the Israeli government or the Israeli regime. You know, I know Yuro doesn’t like the word “regime”, which we keep using, but that is an interesting point. We haven’t seen Israel struck. Israel has been proved to be not invincible, I think it’s fair to say that. But we haven’t seen the Israeli government reeling in the same way that the Iranian government has.

 

[1:25:49]

 

Yuro: Well, there’s a couple of points to make here. First off, with regards to the aircraft carriers, the American Navy has been keeping the aircraft carriers at a much greater range than they would normally use them to attack somebody because they are scared of those missiles. And the Iranians have launched small salvos of kind of like four missiles at time at them and got them to basically back off and back off to a greater distance, which means they can do much fewer kind of bombing runs at once and they have more fuel requirements and greater maintenance on the planes. So it is diminishing America’s capability to attack.

 

There was also satellite footage, I think, from a Chinese satellite that showed a fire on one of the destroyers in one of the aircraft carriers escorts. So potentially that was hit by Iranian missiles and although not sunk, caught fire. So they’re keeping them at bay. The Americans know if they get any closer, they will be hit.

 

And with regards to the missiles that they’re firing, it seems like they’ve used a lot of their kind of crappier munitions and their older munitions, like everything they’ve been launching at the other Gulf states is short range ballistic missiles that don’t have the range to go anywhere else. So they might as well use them on these targets. And they’ve been using up these older, less advanced munitions and drones and still still getting so many interceptors wasted before they actually bring out the big guns. And we’ve seen within the past day or two they’re starting to launch these missiles. I can’t remember the name of them, but they’re like a very large cluster munition that drops about 60 different submunitions on the way down and they’re dropping those on Israel.

 

And as I said in the very beginning, we just don’t know how much is actually getting through and how much damage they’re actually doing because it’s censored and covered up.

 

Natty: Yeah, we did touch on this and like you said, like an interceptor system, like a THAAD or like a Patriot battery or whatever, costs like in the millions, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars. And they’re being used up [chuckling] like drones with lawnmower engines and like a few kilogram warheads. And Iran’s just like churning these things out, like churning them out and churning them out and they’re still intact and they’re at some point America is going to run out of interceptors.

 

And I don’t know if you saw this, but the pedojew regime in America like called its defense manufacturers, heads of its defense manufacturing industry in for like an emergency meeting to say:

 

“We need more missiles! We need more stuff like come on, make it happen!”

 

But I was listening to something earlier saying this is very well demanding that, but there’s a lot of a very expensive gear that goes into this stuff, like certain gases and certain rare earth elements and guidance systems and radio radar systems and optics and all the rest of it that has to go into this missile production.

 

Meanwhile, you know, Iran can get like a cheap [chuckling] Chinese lawnmower engine, stick it in a, like a fiberglass Shahed drone shell, put a bit of explosive on the tip of it and just launch it wherever it runs, you know, within a few hundred mile radius, which is enough to cover the Gulf states and Strait of Hormuz and all this oil production that Europe relies on and lots of other people rely on and it’s going to destabilise all these countries that surround it.

 

Yuro: There’s a psychological aspect of them just doing the drip, drip, drip, dropping wave after wave of missiles on the Israelis, that’s definitely going to be wearing the Israelis down.

 

And also let’s say they absolutely opened up and dropped every missile that they had on Tel Aviv and the surrounding areas. Well in that situation the Israelis would come out and enact the Samson Option, wouldn’t they? And just you know, destroy them with their own nuclear weapons so that obviously they’re not going to feel like they can just drop everything on them at once because they don’t want to force them into that corner where they say:

 

“All right, well we’re doomed anyway!”

 

Natty: Well the other thing to remember is for Iran, the people in Iran and the government in Iran understands this is like a fight for survival. Like I said earlier, if they lose now, if they fail in this defense of their nation, they turn into a failed state. Israel has free reign and MI6 and the CIA have free reign to just fund all sorts of horrible like disgusting groups like ISIS and like the Kurds and everyone else to come and storm their country and make it into a living hellhole, just like they’ve done with Syria and Iraq and Libya.

 

So they understand this is a fight for their survival. So they’ve got to bend their entire will to doing this. Israel and America can stop anytime and can be forced to their knees if their civilian populations demand it. You know dropping cluster munitions on Tel Aviv is like a terror tactic. Well I mean “terror” in like air quotes, right? But at some point the Israeli people, the jews in Israel were going to have had enough of air raid sirens and cluster munitions raining on their heads and could be going to demand that it ends one way or another.

 

And this is what happened in the 12 Day War. I mean if you listen to shills and like pedojew media you would think that Iran lost a 12 day war, but it was Israel who cried off, who’d taken enough punishment from everything I can see. And it’s only a matter of time. I mean if Iran can sustain what it’s doing the Iron Dome is not stopping a giant like cluster warhead that like you said drops 60 submunitions on the city in a suburb somewhere, they’re going to cry uncle and they’re going to bend the knee to Iran.

 

[1:32:14]

 

Meanwhile Iran can’t stop and it simply can’t otherwise it fails. And I’m sure almost everyone in the country understands that.

 

Yuro: This is like a boxing match where the other side controls the bell. You know, you’ve got Mike Tyson there and he’s got the bell. He chooses when the match ends. You don’t want to give it everything you’ve got and gas out too early because it might go on another five minutes.

 

So they are happy to let this draw out. And everything that the Americans and the Israelis has done has all been about, let’s go in there with the alpha strike, let’s drop as much on them as we can, let’s take out this, let’s take out that, and then we’ll just walk away and say:

 

“Mission successful, we can walk away now.”

 

And the Iranians are like:

 

“No, we’re not surrendering! We’re going to keep on fighting!”

 

Because as time continues it gets more and more in their favour. What they don’t want to do is say:

 

“Right let’s have a ceasefire!”

 

And three months, six months down the line, it starts all over again. They’re better off just continuing it now.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree with that.

 

I mean, this is, like I said, this is a long, long time in the making. This is a long term plan of Israel’s to destroy and destabilise Iran. So if there’s ever, if there’s a ceasefire, if this stops, it’s going to be back on again at some point. And in the same way that a Gaza ceasefire isn’t really a ceasefire and at some point Israel is going to move on Gaza again and try and wipe those people out. So I think the Iranians understand that. Well, hopefully they understand that.

 

So we’ll see what happens.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is interesting because they haven’t begged, have they haven’t begged and they haven’t cucked! I think they know there is no negotiations. That’s one of the big problems earlier that we talked about though. You know, when you make it so negotiation is meaningless, you essentially do put people with their backs to the wall. You know, if you’ve got a guy, you know, stood in his house with a pistol and the police are like:

 

“Look, let’s negotiate.”

 

But you know that when the police come through that door, they’re going to shoot you no matter what. At that point, what are you going to do? Is it going to be fight to the death, blaze of glory time, or is it going to be:

 

“Well, I’ll spend 12 hours negotiating only to be shot in the head anyway.”

 

At that point, you are creating an interesting sort of situation where fundamentally the American word is good for nothing! And the only answer is to fight to the death. And look, you know, without going into World War II, many, many Germans surrendered in good faith, believing that they were going to be treated like human beings, that they were going to be treated honourably, that surrendering to the Americans would be the right thing, that they would go home, that they would be treated as prisoners of war. And then they were brutalised and starved to death. I mean, surrendering to America is often, …

 

Natty: Or sent to Russia as slaves.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Natty: Even starved on the banks of the Rhine or sent to Russia as slaves. Yeah, you shouldn’t imagine that you’re going to be treated fairly if you surrender to these people. They’ve shown, as we discussed earlier, they’ve shown that they’ve got no honour. They’ve shown that they’re dishonourable people and they don’t treat civilians well. Those are the lessons that should be taken from this.

 

Yuro: They protest for their right to rape captives. When their own people have been caught on video, you know, sodomizing prisoners like Gazans that they’ve captured, they protest. And they don’t say it didn’t happen

 

Natty: Out in the street.

 

Yuro: Yeah, they said they turn out in the street to protest and say:

 

“We should be allowed to sodomize them!”

 

Is there any other country in the world where you would get that?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think one of the interesting things about Trump, and this is sort of just one of my sort of notes on this, is that Trump came in as this “art of the deal”, wanting to put world peace on the table, get America out of the foreign wars that have dogged it for some time. And essentially what we’ve actually seen is quite the opposite. Trump actually does seem to be. And this isn’t meant to be a compliment, by the way, but it probably comes off as a little bit of a compliment. But he does seem to be sort of the ultimate ZOG warlord, doesn’t he? Trump as a guy, as a mad sort of emperor stood, you know, addressing his troops does seem to be a role that he slips into far more easily and readily than the role of peacemaker.

 

Now, I’ve seen him in these interviews. I’ve seen him talking about future operations. I’ve seen the way he really does love having this power and being able to tell other nations to bow to him or else. And that’s what he’s saying, really, with Iran:

 

“You’ll do what I say or I’m going to completely raze you to the ground!”

 

Now saying that, do you think there has ever been a more philo-semitic president? And following this, do you think this will change the way Americans vote in the future?

 

[1:37:45]

 

 

Natty: I doubt it. And there may have been more philo-semitic presidents, but certainly not in our time, or I mean, our time is in a time when I’ve been a, like an adult. I think I was 12 at the time when the first Gulf War started, when Bush rolled into Iraq and dragged Blair in and dragged the rest of the British people in. But it’s hard to imagine a more philo-semitic president.

 

And I think part of the problem is. Well, maybe it’s not a problem for them, although it might turn out to be, who knows, depending on how this thing goes, is that more and more people were just nakedly seeing it as that it’s like, why, what possible reason could the American people, like the people in America have for engaging in this terminal war with Iran? What possible cause do the British people have against the people of Iran? You know, flimsy excuses like:

 

“Oh, they’re a terrorist nation and you know, they might at some point have a nuke!”

 

This just doesn’t cut it. This isn’t a reason that sensible people would launch wars against people and go on these destructive campaigns against people.

 

Yuro: Sunni Pakistanis rape children. So we need to fight against them

 

Natty: Yeah:

 

“We need to fight a Shia country, a Persian Shia country!”

 

Yeah, absolute lunacy! But people, I think people genuinely understand more now. But this is just jews! This is a war for jews. It’s a war for Israel. And Trump is like deeply, deeply friends with the jewish paedophile who was the mover and shaker for the evil jewish paedophile regime. This is their guy. You know, he is their guy and he’s the guy who’s going to see this done. Not for you, not for your family, not for the American infrastructure, not for the home country and what it means for the future of America, but for Israel and for his jewish handlers. And people, I think, understand that. More and more people understand that, which is why this war is so unpopular.

 

Yuro: We see more and more people waking up to jewish power every day. And in America, I mean, you see mainstream Leftists like Ana Kasparian from the young Turks goes out and just says:

 

“The goyim are waking up! Deal with it!”

 

And that’s amazing to see and it’s a great thing! But at the end of the day there’s no one for them to vote for. The two party system in America is so entrenched, they’re not going to have that option anytime soon to actually get out of it. I mean you’re just going to have a continuation of the same thing where you have presidents get elected and have lower and lower approval ratings, but the people just won’t believe it.

 

Natty: And that’s like you said, no other choice. And I’ll remind, you know, Mark was saying that President Trump ran on like a “no foreign intervention, no foreign wars” ticket. Certainly in 2016 he did. But every president has done that and most of the prime ministers and most of the regimes in this country have run on the same kind of, “we’re not for foreign wars”!

 

And yet every time there’s a foreign war on behalf of Israel and the jews, these people snap to. And all of a sudden it’s:

 

“Well, this war is justified. And this is a terrorist regime and Syria used Sarin gas on its people and Iran is a terrorist state and Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

 

So these people know that foreign wars aren’t popular and you know, foreign wars within justifications, but foreign wars where there is literally no justification apart from the jews want us to do this, are extremely unpopular! And burn through the veil that these people use to hide what they do and kind of hide the levers they pull in order to get what they want.

 

Mark Collett: That’s very interesting. And I do concur. I don’t think there is anyone else to vote for. But I’m not really here to correct anyone tonight. I think everyone’s made excellent points, but you are actually wrong that it was just, 2016. There are pictures floating around that I’ve actually shared showing with Trump and Vance stood together and it’s the kind of text around them is “the peace ticket”, you know, saying:

 

“You’re voting first, you’re voting for peace!”

 

This is what they ran on this time as well. And Trump did make these huge sort of overtures to the Nobel Committee, that he wanted the Nobel Prize Peace Prize, that he was going to stop these wars, which obviously he hasn’t done.

 

Natty: I think I’m probably guilty of paying less attention to the Trump campaign in 2022, [chuckling] when it was in 2016. But, yeah, I can well believe it. And I’ve heard, I’ve seen that in headlines, quoted for the peace ticket. And Trump lambasting Obama on Twitter at the time, saying:

 

“Oh, Obama’s going to start a war in Iran because he’s such a terrible negotiator and he sucks at being a peaceful president.”

 

And it’s like, yeah so many years later, you’re the guy. You’re the guy these people have activated to get this done.

 

[1:43:07]

 

Mark Collett: Well, indeed. And the next point, because we’re sort of getting towards what do we think’s going to happen?

 

But before we do that, I think one of the interesting things about this is we’ve seen, so there are a lot of, what can I call them, “Shitbag influencers” like Tommy Robinson, Douglas Murray, Andrew Neil. I despise Andrew Neil! Fat, worthless toad! The day he has sort of a gigantic Coronary as he sat eating his sort of duck pate on his terrace in the south of France will be a good day for the world! That guy is always on the wrong side of everything. He wants to attack Iran, wanted all the Covid restrictions. I can’t remember him ever saying anything good. He is scum of the earth!

 

But on the other side, we have seen this in interesting bipartisan pushback. We’ve seen Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Ana Kasparian. There has been this mass awakening to Israel! I mean, Tucker Carlson stood in front of Turning Point USA getting a standing ovation for saying:

 

“Israel needs to get out of American politics!”

 

That is seismic. You know, he is still the biggest American political voice in terms of being an influencer. I think this is incredible!

 

Now, I was somebody that was quite happy for Trump to get in for a couple of reasons, but one of the reasons being that I believed that this would bring things to a head. I believe that the Trump regime would be the regime that accelerated things to a point where numerous people who had previously been extremely philo-semitic would end up coming out, breaking ranks, and there would be a mainstream acceptance of our points. I remember saying that, actually I was briefly invited on WarStrike, of all streams, the night of the election.

 

And I was like:

 

“Look, this isn’t a bad thing! Don’t have a cow over this basically. This is something that may well bring us certain benefits.”

 

And I think that we are sort of seeing this to a large degree now. What do you guys think about this? Because I can’t really remember the last time we’ve actually seen a such a bipartisan move against Israel. And it’s not just the ones I’ve mentioned. I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been incredible! Tucker Carlson’s leading the charge with young Right-wing males and females. Turning Point USA, which used to be absolutely ZOGged, is now a hive of like counter-semitism, if you like.

 

And on top of all of that, having the absolutely delightful and wife ready material known as Ana Kasparian.

 

Yuro: She’s absolutely perfect! [chuckling] Coming out for me!

 

Mark Collett: What? What did you say Yuro?

 

Natty: What did you say?

 

Yuro: It’s a bit brown for me.

 

Natty: Get out! Booted from this stream!

 

Mark Collett: You know what? Do you know what? Yuro’s got this thing, right, where you show any girl who’s got the mildest amount of than, and he goes into some kind of like tail spin as if like White women have never ever set foot out of the house!

 

Yuro: Are Armenians White?

 

Natty: This one is. This one certainly is!

 

Yuro: If she’s anti-semitic, she’s White! Okay.

 

Mark Collett: The question is, Yuro, are you White? [chuckling] Because the fact you’ve asked this of our lady in chief, …

 

Natty: Perfect Queen.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a perfect Queen means maybe you’re, …

 

Yuro: I’m not as big as simp as you are mate!

 

Mark Collett: Mate, there’s nothing simpy about loving Ana!

 

Natty: It’s [chuckling] a justified simpery.

 

Mark Collett: It’s justified simpery. Yeah. And so why I like Ana as well is when she gets angry, she just doesn’t hold back, does she? She’s one of those people, sometimes watching somebody get really angry, …

 

Natty: There was a clip, there was a clip of her on Piers Morgan and she was like yelling at these like jews. There were like six of them on the panel and I think they were all jews apart from her and Piers Morgan. And she’s like yelling and screaming at them because they’re trying to dissemble and you know, do what “aboutery” about the killing in Gaza and the killing kids in Iran and stuff. And she’s really letting them have it! And she’s screaming at them. There was some like Boomer in the Facebook comments, like:

 

“Oh, I tried to watch it but I couldn’t take the screeching!”

 

I just, I put underneath it, I was like:

 

“I would listen to her scream about jews in my ear all night!”

 

Mark Collett: Look, [chuckling] that is how I feel that like she has come out and when she does it? She does it! So if you’re screaming like some mad, sort of disheveled, for want of a better term, “Karen” and so you’re sort of mad because there was only, …

 

Yuro: Karen is a slur.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it is, but Karen can also, you know what I mean? You get some women who’ll go crackers over like the fact there’s only seven olives in there, you know, olive pasta. And the menu shows eight or something and they throw an absolute fit over it! But the way she blows up, it’s so attractive. She’s like:

 

“Don’t give me this! You disgusting Zionist pig! You make me sick!”

 

And she’s enunciating every one of her words and she’s not holding back either. She’s like:

 

“You child killing monsters!”

 

Natty: It’s like righteous fury at the people she’s like, that’s been put up on these panel shows.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. Exactly! And when you’re watching it’s extremely attractive! It’s not sort of like I said, I know “Karen” is a bit of an anti-White slur, but it’s not Karen-esque. It’s not like an overly liberal White woman and who’s outraged because of something minor that normal people are like:

 

“Look, just pull yourself together.”

 

The way she does it, I find it to be absolutely cracking! I love it!

 

Anyway, that’s enough glazing of Ana Kasparian. I mean, look, can there ever be enough glazing about the Kasparian? That could be a two hour stream in itself!

 

[1:49:33]

 

 

Natty: It’s for Yuro, apparently. I mean, Yuro’s not on the Kasparian train here, unfortunately. Maybe we’ll have to have a word with [word unclear] after the stream.

 

Mark Collett: We have to, … You mean a beating? [chuckling]

 

Natty: You’re going to a re-education camp.

 

Mark Collett: After the show in the green room, we give him a kicking!

 

So what do you think of this bipartisan movement, though? I find it refreshing. I like it. And it’s got real gravitas. Because, look, I was on the David Duke show earlier and obviously I work with David probably more than anybody else in the world, for better or worse. And I love David! He’s a real character. He can be a bit difficult at times, but he’s a real character. But sadly, David does not have the influence he once had.

 

And I’m not saying that to sort of mock David or deride David. I’m just saying that as a statement of fact. But somebody like Ana Kasparian does have that power! She does have that gravitas, but so does Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. You know, Tucker Carlson. Absolutely massive! And you’re watching these people tear in to the Zionist cause and attack these Warhawk jews. It is very refreshing! I mean, well, for me, it is anyway. I mean, I don’t know about you guys, but I love it!

 

I mean, how does this make you feel after all the years of being in the wilderness? Look, being in the wilderness is something that. I am still very much in the wilderness, despite all my hard work over the years, despite my incredible consistency. Like, if I’m not the perfect guy, okay, not by a long, long means, I am very good at debates, but I’m not the perfect guy. I have my foibles. I screw up, …

 

Yuro: Not good at controlling your temper.

 

Mark Collett: I was gonna joke there by exploding at you!

 

Natty: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: I’m not brilliant at controlling my temper, but one thing you’ve got to say for me is that throughout all these years, I have been extremely consistent in what I’ve stood for.

 

Now, when it comes down to it, seeing these people, for me, anyway, come out and be sort of so, you know, completely anti-Israel. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen it. And it’s not just relying on, as I said, this isn’t to knock David, but it’s not just to rely on me and David Duke making the point anymore. You know, these points are being made by these more mainstream individuals who’ve got serious gravitas. And I actually like that. I think it’s something that I think is really important. Seeing Ana Kasparian and seeing all these others doing it. I think this has taken our message to a new crowd. And it’s interesting to see that there are people all over the political system who have had enough of Israel.

 

Natty: Yeah. And I think having this kind of, it’s not perfect. The things they say aren’t perfect. Right. And the problem isn’t just Israel. And I think most people get that. And this isn’t to kind of pee on your cornflakes, Mark. But even the things they’re saying do give amount of headroom for anyone who’s less sizable and less influential from them to kind of push those boundaries a little bit more. And there is further to push.

 

I mean, we shouldn’t be coming around the campfire at this stage to stretch your wilderness analogy. We should be trying to, we should still be in the wilderness telling the truth and putting the final truth to it. Because, like I said the things are saying are anti-Israel, which is like 90% of the way there, right?

 

And like I said, giving headroom for more, not extreme, that’s not the word, but for a greater and more deep understanding to come forth.

 

And I think that you are going to see from this war with Iran, you’re going to see a tranche of politicians and people emerge who are willing to say these things. And sure, amongst those people there are going to be shills and they’re going to be subversive people, but at some point it just becomes like a political football whether you support Israel and whether you’re going to do their bidding.

 

I mean, one of the disappointing things with Rupert Lowe is he hasn’t really come out against, he hasn’t made a statement against Israel, which I’m sure none of us really expect, but now would be the perfect time for someone in his position to make that leap. We haven’t seen it yet, but I think this just pushes that football a little bit further down the road. You know, pushes the can a little bit further down the road to give space for that to happen.

 

Yuro: I think every day that the Rupert Lowe goes out and doesn’t support Israel, even if he won’t explicitly say that he’s against them, obviously that’s giving us room and whatnot.

 

But another thing, sort of talking about, obviously, the goyim waking up and Trump, I think it is great that we see all these people realizing the extent of jewish power.

 

And I think Trump especially is to thank for it, because he is just so openly philo-semitic in a way that no previous president, even if they love jews as much as he does, they just wouldn’t do it so openly! You know, he goes out there and declares himself the King of Israel and he says this, that and the other. And it’s again, with the attack on Iran and the thing with Venezuela, there’s not even a pretence anymore. It’s just:

 

“We’re doing this because it’s in our interest and we’re attacking Iran because that’s what we want to do!”

 

They’re not having the pretence anymore.

 

[1:55:32]

 

Mark Collett: I don’t like to cut across people because we’ve all been pretty good at not cutting across people. But I just wanted to further your point. You know, when Trump does things which are so sort of egregious [chuckling] that you sort of wonder why he’s saying them. Like when he said:

 

“Oh the Adelsons basically bought me the White House! So whenever they want to just walk in and ask for a policy to be passed, what am I gonna do? It’s the bloody Adelsons! They gave me about half a billion. How are you gonna say no to the people who gave you half a billion? Come on, guys, let’s get things going!”

 

You’re thinking to yourself:

 

“Are you actually saying this? Are you actually saying to people, ‘look, the Adelsons bought me the White House. So then when they want a policy passing, I just bring them in and say, ‘What do you want?’ And when they say, ‘I want this.’ I just give it to them’.”

 

Most people would know which bits not to say out loud. You know, it’s like when you were a kid, your mom was like:

 

“Did you clean up the house?”

 

You’d be like:

 

“Yeah, I did!”

 

But you wouldn’t be:

 

“Well, actually, I spilt the water from the big vase, partially flooded the living room, spent ages dabbing it up, and have hid the stain under the mat!”

 

Because there’s part of it that you don’t say out loud, isn’t there? And there’s part that you say out loud. But Trump, he says it all out loud, and it becomes sort of so almost jarring to hear him say it, because for years, we’ve heard that politicians are bought, they’re sold. You know, powerful foreign forces pay for politicians to do their bidding. And here’s Trump just honestly saying:

 

“Well, that’s exactly what happens! I do it all the time! The Adelsons basically funded me, and I did everything for them. So when they want a policy, I give them!”

 

You don’t say that out loud, do you? You say:

 

“The Adelsons are an important part of what we’re hoping to do, and no one has undue influence over me, but I’m happy to hear from them.”

 

He doesn’t do any of that. There’s no beating around the bush. He basically says:

 

“Jew’s got me in. And when they want a policy passing, I give it to them!”

 

I mean, is that refreshing to hear? For me, it is, because it confirms everything that we’ve always said.

 

Natty: Yeah, he is known for slurping up the “juju come”. As someone put in the chat earlier.

 

I think the worrying thing is, or I guess it’s not worrying. I mean, it’s interesting. So there was like just this ground swell of JQ awareness, like Israel hatred after October 7th because of what Israel was doing to Gaza.

 

And then the media gets to declare:

 

“There’s a ceasefire, Gaza’s over. We can look away now. We can look away from the fact that Israel has been bombing hospitals and stuff.”

 

Because of the nature of the news cycle and everything else, people let it drop. And then this big orange slave, jew slave, Trump, comes along and starts a war with Iran, like, totally on behalf of his jewish handlers in Israel. And all of a sudden it’s like:

 

“Oh, right, my awareness is shaking again.”

 

Like:

 

“Now there’s just another thing that’s like, cannot be ignored where we have to bring out this question again to the public and try and explain why this war for Israel isn’t anything to do with jews and is secretly about Russia.”

 

Or whatever else it is. You know, so, yeah, I mean, awareness, awareness rising!

 

Mark Collett: So we pretty much wrapped up a lot of the things we were going to talk about. And we’ve already said that Israel has been proven through this not to be invincible.

 

And I think that’s one of the key things here. At one point, Israel touted the Iron Dome. It touted their invincibility. I think this has shown something that’s very interesting. It’s highlighted that America is Israel’s lapdog! But it’s also highlighted that without America, Israel couldn’t exist. And that’s important, I think, for two reasons.

 

There’s this symbolic idea of Israel being this invincible outpost in the Middle East that the Iron Dome protects and they can stand alone if necessary. I think Israel have been really undermined here, not just from a moral perspective, but from the view that they can be hurt, which is important. You know, one of the big things, if you’re ever in some kind of conflict, facing what appears to be an immovable or unstoppable enemy, to show that that enemy is, in fact, fallible and can be hurt is very important.

 

And although we’ve hardly seen Israel sink into the Mediterranean, I do think the strikes on Israel have been significant from the point of view that it has shown them to be scared, that if they don’t have the West on their side, they can’t defend themselves.

 

Yuro: Well, it’s like with October 7th. When October 7th happened, it showed the world that they’re not all powerful, they’re not all knowing, they’re not always just gonna win because they’ve got everything on lockdown. Their power does have limits. And there’s some amount of White nationalists who come out and say:

 

“Oh, no, they let that happen1 You know, they let that happen on purpose! That they have a reason to do this.”

 

But actually, it’s like you’re unwilling to believe that they just screwed up that badly.

 

[2:01:21]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m not going to get into a big debate, but I actually believe they let that happen. I believe that that was part of their plan and gave them this imperative to do what they did in Gaza.

 

However, I think Iran’s a different kettle of fish. I think that what we’re seeing with Iran here is something fundamentally much more damaging for them, because they have nothing to gain by letting Iran smash through the Iron Dome. They have nothing that they can say:

 

“Well, this gives us the moral imperative to do X.”

 

Because in the case of Iran, they’ve already done X, haven’t they? X has already been committed to, it’s already been carried out.

 

So I think there’s different things here.

 

But look, let’s wrap this up and we’re going to wrap this up before we do the questions and answers. If anyone wants to Superchat. If you’ve enjoyed the stream, please consider sending a Superchat. But we’re going to wrap this up with, obviously we’ve said this is for the Greater Israel Project and we’ve talked about the political ramifications around the world for America, for Russia, for China, for future conflicts.

 

But one thing we haven’t talked about is the political ramifications here in Britain. Now, obviously Starmer hasn’t embroiled himself and he’s made the right choice in that case, but probably for the wrong reasons. Rather than doing this because he doesn’t want to serve Israel, he’s done this because he doesn’t want to turn the Muslim bloc vote against him any further because he fears losing the next general election.

 

But what we can see here, or what I see here, is a major problem with refugees and they’re talking about potentially two, … There was the, I think it was the Telegraph that stated this. The calculation is that 2.5 million people will be displaced from the region due to this conflict. At the present time, that number could obviously rise and they’re all going to be coming to Europe, they’re not going to be going to Israel.

 

And I’ve always described this as sort of the twin evils of Israel. On one hand, Israel menaces, murders, maims, terrorizes states in the Middle East for its own gain and to maintain dominance in the region. However, the blowback is never for Israel! The blowback of all this ends up hitting Western nations who take the refugees or the people that are displaced.

 

And I think that’s the final piece of the puzzle, that the Greater Israel Project makes Israel more powerful, but by extension due to the knock on effect, it weakens the West, it pushes us closer to a demographic shift that will be unrecoverable and fundamentally takes us a step nearer to being a minority in our ancestral homelands!

 

Natty: Yeah, destabilising its immediate neighbours, like I said earlier, destabilising its immediate neighbours with missiles and bombs and gayops and all the rest of it, is a short timescale. But destabilising European countries with mass immigration and kind of ethnic cleansing and all the rest of that, that’s still just destabilisation. It’s just on a longer time scale. And I alluded to this earlier, but the Israeli gayops and the CIA and Mossad and MI6 operation, well I mean it was the open British government was just aiding like terrorists in Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi. Gaddafi had an agreement with Italy where Italy would pay him to stop, just endless floods of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. And Israel uncaring that that was in place or seeing that actually destroying that was a good thing because it helped destabilise everything, not just Europe, but top to Libya, decided to enact you know, plans against Gaddafi that ended with him, like I said, with a bayonet up his bum, dragged out into the street.

 

And that led to the migration crisis in 2015, 2014, 2015, which is ongoing today. And I just posted in the private chat there because I just looked this up, Morgoth’s Law, which was spoken by Morgoth himself:

 

“No matter where the conflict is in the world, the refugees coming to Europe will be fighting age black and brown men!”

 

And that’s going to hold true for this conflict.

 

Now that might be coincidental in other cases but certainly with Iran this is the double, not the double edged sword but like the win-win situation for Israel. They get to destabilise nations by direct war against their like direct competitors. But they also get to destabilise their so-called “allies” in terms of European nations in America with all these displaced people who then through their human rights groups and refugee groups and these kind of NGOs get to set up migration routes into the countries who are supposedly their allies that they help destabilise. The knock on for politics in this country, unfortunately there won’t be much because we don’t have much of a choice. And if Reform was in power at the moment it would probably be just balls out gung-ho for Israel. So what choice do you have in this country? I mean it’s probably less than anywhere else.

 

Mark Collett: I will say though, I think Yuro is right in what he said. Every day that Rupert Lowe spends not endorsing Israel is a victory from our point of view. You know, I know that might sound like a cucky thing to say, but it has been so long since we’ve had anybody in any form of position of genuine power who hasn’t immediately been a slave to Israel. And it’s one of the things that Tommy Robinson’s been quite upset actually by a number of things Rupert Lowe has said and done. I don’t know if you saw, but Tommy Robinson said:

 

“You know, Rupert Lowe needs to clarify whether black people can be British. Rupert Lowe needs to clarify his position on all these things!”

 

Well, I find that very interesting because that suggests that Tommy and his handlers are getting quite nervous that Rupert isn’t going to be the Zio lap dog they hoped he would.

 

[2:07:56]

 

Natty: Yeah, the kind of the cucked civnat stuff that always bends towards this like piss-weak conservatism, as we’ve seen with Reform, where it just turns out they’re just as I mean they’re not really even civic nationalists, they’re just Conservatives in that anyone’s British, anyone who steps foot on this island is British.

 

So yeah, I mean funnily enough, Tommy wrote, those questions from Tommy Robinson he tried to put to Rupert Lowe:

 

“We’re in the wake of the Iran war starting and Rupert Lowe not coming out in support of Israel.”

 

And all of a sudden here you’ve got Tommy Robinson popping up like fresh from snorting up lines of coke on a mirror somewhere in America asking him about the same, well as pulling the same gay ops that he tried with the BNP all those years ago, which you know about very well, Mark.

 

Yuro: And after hopping off his private jet with his son, who’s posting about it on Instagram while he begs for money from poor White people who haven’t got a dime to scrape together.

 

Natty: Yeah, Tommy Robinson, just to reiterate, is absolute scum! He is scum! Everything out of Tommy Robinson’s mouth is like a jewish handler somewhere. And that has become more and more clear! There’s no like, no intersection of lines from real dissidency in this country in the West. And Tommy Robinson, this is like a literal jewish mouthpiece being paid by Israel to say the things he does.

 

And if you think there’s some part of Tommy that’s still good or some part of him that’s still worth listening to, then you simply haven’t been paying attention. And you need to, I don’t know, get with the programme or get your head right, because he’s evil, he’s terrible, and he’s a scumbag!

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

So I think we’ve had a pretty robust chat. We’re going to do the Superchats in a couple of seconds. If you want a Superchat, please do.

 

But I’ll say this, I think in conclusion. I’ve said this many times before, but the judeo-American empire is the greatest threat to the world!

 

Yuro: And I’ve said they are the great Satan!

 

Mark Collett: Well, it’s not just the greatest threat, is it to White people. Now we obviously are fundamentally our thoughts are for White people. That’s the most important thing for us, that we look after people of European descent.

 

However, it’s not just people of European descent that suffer under the judeo-American State. Obviously Arabs suffer immensely.

 

And a lot of the problems created by the judeo-American States, actions such as these unnecessary wars, these toppling of sovereign regimes, the murder of government leaders in foreign countries, like Colonel Gaddafi. And look, when we say this, we’re not saying that Colonel Gaddafi is our hero or that we loved everything he did, but he was stopping millions of people passing through his country and entering Europe. And I’m sure that when he was toppled, there were many people within the Israeli regime and many leading jews in America and Europe that were very happy that there was going to be even more migrants headed to Europe.

 

And I believe that the only real way that the world can achieve freedom is for the judeo-American Empire to fall. I don’t know whether you guys agree with that. Obviously have 30 seconds each to sum up, or a minute or whatever you need.

 

Natty: That’s totally correct! And that is the line of, like I said a second ago, real dissidency, and this kind of rightoid, Right-wing, edgy conservatism. Like you said, the judeo-American Empire is the threat, is the problem! And if you’re not willing to say that, if you’re not willing to like cheer on its losses, then you’re not on the same level as you should be. I mean, you’re not where you should be. And I’m sure everyone listening to this is pretty much there, but those are the lines. There’s not a Left, Right, divide. There’s not a third Worldist, whatever it is, divide. It’s just you’re either hoping for this evil entity to fail or you’re not at this point. But, and we’re seeing, hopefully we’re seeing part of it sailing here. We’re going to see it fail more and more.

 

So that’s what I’m looking forward to. Not just that, but the visceral feeling when you, like you said, see a cluster munition raining down on Tel Aviv, feels good too. So enjoy it.

 

Yuro: White people the world over shall not be free until organised jewry is disempowered! Inshallah!

 

Mark Collett: That [chuckling] was the most concise you’ve been all night mate. Superb!

 

So, yeah, I think it’s been a very productive stream this evening.

 

And I think we’ve talked about a lot of things that people would want us to talk about. And without being boastful, I think that tonight we’ve kind of hit on more or less every major point, unless we haven’t.

 

But I think we put a lot of effort, obviously into ensuring that we did hit every major talking point tonight. And this was the, probably, I’d say the most comprehensive coverage of this particular issue that anyone will get. So I’m hoping that you guys enjoyed it. And we are going to do the Superchats now.

 

[2:13:54]

 

So thank you to everyone who has Superchatted. And if you haven’t, there is obviously still time. And remember, if you do send a financial contribution, it’s gratefully received because it’s what allows me to keep doing things like this and doing these streams.

 

Anyway, Mr. Skywalker gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“You and Red Ice were definitely correct about ZOG’s superior tactical advantage, which I never doubted. Still Iran and its proxies and have fared better than expected. Landing hits on ZOG’s military assets.”

 

And he goes on with another $3 and said:

 

“It appears ZOG is carpet bombing civilian structures in Iran now, as many military bases and missile sites are up to a thousand feet below ground, very difficult to destroy. Do you think ZOG will use ICBMs?”

 

I think we’ve said that actually that fundamentally we are seeing probably a better sort of defense than people may have initially thought. However, obviously going up against the judeo-American empire is absolutely not an easy thing to do they are doing better than we thought.

 

And interestingly, the Americans are already resorting to these horrific tactics of bombing civilian structures. Do you think Trump would go as far as using an ICBM?

 

Natty: It’s possible. You know, who knows? At every juncture where you think Trump isn’t going to do something, you know, sometimes, well, quite often he will just go ahead and do it. The problem with nukes is, one that’s a line that if you cross has real implications. If you drop a nuke on a country just because you started a war and are then subsequently losing that war,

 

Yuro: If you started a war to stop them having nukes and then when you have lost you use them!

 

Natty: Yeah, it kind of undermines, it’s a massive red line. Like I said, probably implications that none of us even can think about at this stage.

 

The second thing is, nukes, for all this talk of tactical nukes, they’re a surface weapon. You detonate them above ground. So they don’t really, in this war against Iran, they don’t really have like a tactical purpose and they would only be used to destroy, like, surface, weak, soft civilian targets, like cities. I mean, nukes are designed to be used on cities that are all like massed troop build-ups, which Iran doesn’t have. So morally it would be reprehensible and tactically it’d be stupid. Although it would just, it would literally just be against civilians. To use them in this war would be like, against civilian targets.

 

Yuro: Yeah, it wouldn’t benefit them one bit. And there’s no way that Russia and China would not respond to it. And that’s not saying that they would launch nukes themselves, but there would have to be some kind of bigger response from them. To get more actively involved.

 

Mark Collett: And I think Natty hit the real point here. The only time nukes have ever been used are on civilian targets. They are not a weapon that is used really for military sites. There’s all this talk of:

 

“Oh, well, people have got tactical nukes now, and a tactical nuke does this and the fallout’s not as great.”

 

And we’ve heard all of these sort of takes before, but fundamentally the only proven use for a nuke is to be used against a civilian target. That’s just the way it is.

 

And I personally believe that if the Americans did this and took it down that route, it would be this fundamental turning point that I’m not sure the world could recover from that you know, it’s happened obviously twice before and it was horrific what the Americans did to the Japanese. But to do it now and for America to be doing it because they started the war and it wasn’t going their way, I think the world would change in a way that we probably couldn’t actually completely understand right now! But I don’t think it will go nuclear.

 

Thank you so much for the two Superchats, though. Ruins in a Landscape gave $50. Thank you so much for such a generous Superchat. Bay of Kings gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thanks, Mark. It appears Natty’s dropped out.”

 

One of his devices has come unconnected, it says on the screen. I’m sure he’ll be back. Arab Social Nationalist gave $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Thoughts on the spectacle of the Nigerian leader of the opposition, Olukemi Olufuntu Adagoki Badenok and Farage arguing that Starmer hasn’t done enough for the Yanks. There is no opposition in the British establishment. Ignore a whisper of dissent in Parliament. War for jews unites the establishment.”

 

I think this is very interesting. And obviously Badenock and Farage are looking at what got Trump to power. Now, fundamentally, Farage and Badenok are both out of power at the moment and I think they’re both kissing up to Israel as much as they can, hoping that that will be their ticket to a Trump style run at Parliament. And let’s face it, although at the moment Farage is the favourite to win the next general election, that can all change. And he is looking at sort of shoring up his position. But Kemi Badenok is looking at going into a general election where she will be decimated.

 

So it is interesting to see both Badenoch and Farage fighting to see who can be the most philo-semitic on this particular issue.

 

But I’ll say this, and this isn’t meant to be like a cold way to leave the stream, or a black pill at the end or anything of the sort. But there are still an awful lot, and I call them Boomers because they generally are from that sort of age bracket. Now, it’s not to say all Boomers are evil, but there generally is this sort of Boomer mentality of:

 

“Well, bomb them all! Get rid of the Arabs! We need to support Israel! They’re our greatest ally!”

 

And that rhetoric does still appeal to, I would say, a sizable portion of the Boomer population.

 

Natty: Yeah, I agree. And because they don’t really want to think about it and the implications of it. So looks like:

 

“Oh, something else is going on. Well, to hell with them all! Just blow them all up! Bloody Arabs!”

 

And that’s a cultivated mentality. That’s not an accident that people say things like that and think things like that. This callous, cold, bloodthirsty, you know, mentality that’s been instilled in people through, I mean, basically like a real use of the term racism, where it’s:

 

“Yeah, Arabs are like dirty brown people and killing them anywhere is good!”

 

It’s like well, a normal human being, a moral human being doesn’t actually think that way. And if you’ve been led into thinking that some like, cartoon villain version of like, I don’t know, like a Western man, is ridiculous and retarded and immoral, and the people who put that idea in your head have taken a long time to do it, but have succeeded, if you come out making statements like that.

 

Yuro: And to the extent that it is a naturally occurring phenomenon, it’s as a result of having the Pakistani rape gangs that jewish people and organisations brought here and having the Sunni Wahhabi terrorists who are created by the funding of Saudi Arabia and Israel’s allies.

 

[2:22:23]

 

Natty: Oh, yeah, when Israel needed a recruiting ground for ISIS to destabilise Syria, they just used our country. And the overspill where like little girls were getting blown up in concerts or people were getting stabbed on London Bridge, that was exceptional.

 

Yuro: It’s just a bonus to them.

 

Natty: Yeah, that was just like a little side project for them.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, guys. We’ll go on to the next Superchat. It’s from Tomorrow’s Victims who gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“The vast majority of us here in Yank land do not want the stupid war. Cheers to all my UK people.”

 

Thank you so much! Some Guy 14 gave $10. Thank you so much! And he subscribed for $10. Well, that’s much appreciated. Remember, you can subscribe to me over on Entropy and Rumble, and that means you make a monthly donation.

 

And obviously on Entropy you can subscribe for any amount and Rumble is fixed, $5. But on Rumble, we’ve got a good number of subs now, a good number of followers, and if we had sort of 4 or 500 subs, that would just be phenomenal! And obviously it would really help me financially and it wouldn’t really make a massive difference to people as $5 is what, the price of a large can of Red Bull these days. But if enough people did that, it’d make a huge difference to me.

 

We also have one Superchat over on Rumble, only one tonight, and it’s from Archie P007. Thank you so much! Okay, $5. And you said:

 

“I was all in with Trump, the great awakening and all that he has sold his soul for Israeli gold. No one wins a war, only the people suffer always. Follow the money. Trump is Israel first, it seems.”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, I obviously, I completely agree with that. Trump is Israel first. And Trump is someone who is absolutely committed to Israel, I think, in a way that I’m not sure we’ve ever seen before. I don’t think we’ve ever seen a president this committed to the state of Israel, which is obviously interesting in itself to say that, to say we’ve never had a president that is this committed to Israel, but he certainly is.

 

And at the moment, he is proving his loyalty to that nation to an unbelievable point! And whether this works for him in the long run or not, who knows? But I think it’s fair to say that he is risking everything for his loyalty to people who, …

 

And the interesting thing with these people is they did not support him when he was out in the wilderness. One of the interesting things with Trump is when he was saying:

 

“Look, the election was rigged.”

 

Netanyahu was actually the first foreign leader to say to Biden, to congratulate Biden on his victory. Can you remember that? I mean, Trump went mental about that at the time because he thought Netanyahu was his best friend. But it just goes to show, Trump isn’t actually. Well, he doesn’t actually have any principles whatsoever, does he? Trump is actually a guy that the Israelis can kick him, they can treat him like he’s their boy, their little dog. And when it comes down to it, he will take it time and again.

 

Natty: Yeah, I mean the only difference, just to add the only difference is how open it is now. I mean, like I said earlier, the other president have probably done everything to the detriment of their own people on behalf of Israel. But Trump is just open about it and everyone gets it and everyone knows now and he’s just still ploughing ahead with it. So there’s the difference with this one.

 

Mark Collett: Anything to add Yuro?

 

Yuro: No, no, I think we’ve covered most of that already.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well look, that brings us to the end of the stream.

 

Thank you so much to everyone who has been here and obviously if you haven’t Superchatted and you’re watching this on replay, you can donate anytime you like on replay.

 

And if you do support these streams, especially these long form discussions which take a reasonable amount of time to prepare and we put a lot of effort into, please do consider sending a Superchat and we will keep doing them. Anyway guys, if you want to say good night, we’ll go around the group and then we will wrap things up.

 

[2:26:52]

 

Natty: Night guys. I have been looking at the chat and there’s been a lot of like pretty decent discussion in there. So I appreciate everyone who’s been here and you know, it’s good, it’s good getting all this down and talking about this because a lot of this stuff is beyond the kind of political divide that you see in this country between even nationalists who say things like:

 

“Oh, I don’t care about either side and they can kill each other!”

 

And that’s like the best you can hope for out of supposed Right-wingers and dissidents in this country. But I think a sober analysis and a sober talk about what it all means and what’s happening is worthwhile. So thanks to you two and thanks to the chat for turning up and I’ll see you around.

 

Yuro: Yeah, thanks for having me on. It’s been a good talk with both of you. Obviously we do get a bit of this chat going on with the A-Team, which I’m no longer going to be with because Sam’s back unless I’m a stand-in when someone’s away. But it was good to talk about this stuff. And maybe going forward I will get back into doing some sort of show again on my own. Maybe I’ll revive TASOB. Who knows?

 

Natty: Be very happy if you revived TASOB, buddy. So look forward to it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, thank you to both of you, it’s been a great chat. I just want to wrap things up by saying thank you to everybody.

 

Well, thank you first to Natty and Yuro for giving up their evenings. You know, obviously we enjoy doing this. We’re friends in real life and I think we’ve got pretty good chemistry and I think it’s been a pretty entertaining stream. I would also like to say a huge thank you to everyone who donated. Remember, you can donate at any point you wish.

 

And finally, a massive thank you to everybody who tuned in. We had really good attendance night. Lots of people tuning in, lots of people enjoying the stream and a really sort of quick, moving, interesting discussion on both the Odysee and the Rumble chat.

 

So thank you to everyone who participated.

 

Anyway, I won’t be back on Sunday. It was unlikely I’ll be back on Sunday because it was my son’s birthday this week and we’re having a little party for him on Sunday. So that will likely be something that may run on and I don’t really want to be rushing through that to do a Sunday night film review or stream. I probably just want to enjoy just a little bit of family time, which I’m sure no one begrudges me. And I will be doing that.

 

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday for Patriotic Weekly Review. Until then, thank you everybody, good night and look after yourselves.

 

[2:29:32]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/16/2026 = 288)

Mark Collett
9 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to my work:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

5
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
On YT comments, I’ve noticed more people seem to be realising that Kosher Tommy’s brand of Nationalism is fraudulent & serves no purpose to British people.

14
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Like the English, the Iranians have no other country. Resistance is the only option.

11
0
Hide replies
Aspect of Divinity
5 days ago
I pray to God that the Iranian people succeed in their war against the Zionists and their Western puppets

@RonP1
9 days ago
A safe rule: Never get into bed with the Jew

10
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I have a cousin that married a Jewess. He is dead to me. I used to talk to his Mom frequently and she would complain how his wife basically ended Christmas in their family and how she’s rarely allowed to see her grandchild. I eventually told her “well what do you expect, he married a Jew”. She won’t talk to me anymore lol. My whole family is a bunch of sleepers, but that particular family is fuked. Her other son adopted a South Korean baby when he could have adopted a White baby. I’m done with that whole family.

7
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Not a good move, I guess people who are not race-conscious fall into this trap,
they probably believe ‘It’s just a religion’ and end up with an ugly contaminated baby

3
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Especially someone who marries a Jew, not much you can do there, especially once kids are involved. Even if they subconsciously start to realize their mistake, not only will they never attribute it to the spouse being a Jew, but they are caught in a bind not easily remedied. Same with White people who adopt non-White kids. Dead to me. If there was any possibility to fixing them in the past, that possibility is long gone.

2
0
Hide replies

@RonP1
8 days ago
Imagine working out their Holo story is BS, but having to go along with it for the rest of your life because the wife is Jewish! lol

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I have my doubts my cousin would ever believe at any point that the holo story is a hoax. An old friend of my family also has a son who married a Jewess and from what I know about the 2 families, they are identical – the Jewess wears the pants, the family is Jewish to the core and Whiteness and Christianity has been stripped away. It’s pathetic.

2
0

@Theos19
6 days ago
Sounds like jgew hollywood did its work well on that family bro, sorry to hear this. There is nothing more shameful for a white man than to have a mixed breed child. Adopting another child not of your race is one of the most cucked things you can do. Raising another mans offspring with resources that should be for your own – how f-cking cucked is that. Someone else fcked your girl and put a kid in her, and you are raising their kid LOL. I was in the queue for the checkout once and I got caught staring at a man with his yellow wife (fat b-tch) and his mixed breed freakish looking son, I was with my wife and son around the same age. I couldn’t help but stare, it was like looking at a crash at the side of the road, or someone freakish you know? The cashier had to call me out and ask if she could help. After he noticed me the guy looked crestfallen and his yellow wife didn’t have any respect for him whatsoever lol.

1
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
I’m ashamed to admit that I started out as anti jihad, solely because of my job… I tried to rescue English girls from Pakistani Muslims who were mass raping torturing them, I did 20 years in my profession and saw the government as 100% anti White, anti English in every way. Mark et al helped me understand the truth!

6
0
Hide replies

@Theos19
6 days ago
Were you a social worker? I recall some of your comments on live chats over the years, harrowing stuff. Thank you for trying to stand up to evil. God will recognize his own.

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
6 days ago
Yes for 20 years! I did rescue many English girls, the youngest was age 8! The government is extremely anti White.

3
0

@RonP1
9 days ago
Purim explained…
“One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamoured of a Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King’s minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman’s ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called “Haman’s Ears,” revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew in our midst”
JRM by Arnold Leese

6
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
The Young Turks, Anna K and all that group are not “awakening”. They are still anti-White and that will never change. While Anna does have harsh words for Jews as well as Israel, she and TYT are still anti-White libtards. Please stop blowing a load in your shorts because you think she’s hot. It is, indeed, simp behavior and quite embarrassing for us all.
She is/They are ANTI-WHITE. Got it?
Covington was right. Being pro-White is something Whites have a really hard time doing, even those that are racially conscious.

5
1
Hide replies
Judy_Izzum
8 days ago
anti-white or not, she is still the guest of honour at my hand party

4
2

@RonP1
9 days ago
Civ Nat = Kosher Nationalism

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump comes from the jewish community. He has been around them his entire life. They made his career in realestate in New York. He has belonged to them his whole adult life.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Remember: these jews bombed Qatar to kill Hamas’s chief negotiator. They’re out of control, and they cannot be negotiated with.

4
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s not that they don’t think about it: the British establishment is actively antagonistic towards native British people; it’s not indifference, it’s active malice.

4
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Jews, Muslims, darkies in general. They all gotta go

4
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Next false flag: Nuclear attack on USA, EU country or both. Could be an EMP nuke instead of ground attack.
Lots of dissent for this war on both sides of political aisle, they need something like a “9/11” to force more Westerners to support the war. Approval is falling hard. They need a false flag event. Also would “justify” nuking Iran.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Shalom

0
5
Green
9 days ago
Excellent episode title. Spot-on. Thanks for your incredibly important work, Mark.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
THE JEW CRIES OUT IN PAIN AS HE SHITS HIMSELF AT THE BOMB SHELTER!

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
yes I know a jew was in charge of the Armenian genocide. And the fact that Armenians are Christians made it so much enjoyable for the jews.

3
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
I like that the left woke up to the jq but make no mistake they still hate white men. And want white genocide.

1
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
The left did not “wake up to the Jewish question”. They still love and defend Jews. They do not see the Israel problem as a Jewish problem, they see it as a White Supremacy problem. I know it all sounds so contradictory and stupid, but that is what you get with a brainwashed group of people. They only oppose and support what they are told to, without thinking about it.

2
0
Prison Ships
9 days ago
The Honourable Pastor Chuck Baldwin leads +40k AntiZionist Christians out of Liberty Fellowship Montana.

3
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson drives a Bentley, all while his rightoid followers pay for his “legal fund”.

3
0
Alice1488
8 days ago
The likes are 101 and they need to be 109! Or 110, 111 etc

2
0
Edelweiß
8 days ago
Unless Judeo-Christian civilization is destroyed, the European race will die. Crush Jehovah! Hail Jupiter and give us victory!

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
We Whites must destroy the enemy race; they have relentlessly been attempted to destroy us for centuries! We Whites, of European descent must end this madness for the sake of all humanity.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
it was a bit like watching the A-Team but without the game and gay dancing tbf

2
0
Natty
9 days ago
night guys

1
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Cheers goyim \o

2
0

@RonP1
9 days ago(edited)
Remember before the 2016 election when the bell end said he would re-investigate 9/11 if he ever got into power

2
0
Ulrich22
9 days ago
most people dont have real opinion at all. they all hope that it goes away and they can forget about it like they did for the last 80 years or so.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Decades of Hollywood propaganda had a big part in it.

2
0

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Well done lads, I’ve learned a lot tonight

2
0
Hide replies
Alice1488
8 days ago
Me too, watching on replay! My friends dog is healing well, and has thoroughly enjoyed the chicken , skin and stock .

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Imagine a future Britain that has normal relations with foreign countries. It’s not asking for much.

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@MarkCollett
– Starmer SAYS he’s not getting involved, but as we know from Gaza, he can assist Israel secretly. Don’t be quick to believe his public stance.

2
0

@Stryker!
9 days ago

@VesselofGrace
I may have to return to my roots. lol

2
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“Peace through perpetual war, goyim!”

2
0

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
No Iranian ever called me a goyim

2
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago
I don’t like this new term “Epstein regime” it takes away from “ZOG”, which is much more poignant.

2
0
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
“ZOG” deters from Jew though.

1
0
Bronze Green Oakwood
5 days ago
“I’m surprised he hasn’t drowned in jewish semen”
That came out of nowhere, nearly spat out my drink there.

1
0
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
“We tried the internet and spent years tapping to one another on keyboards, because we bought into the idea that ‘education’ was the answer, and if we could just get the truth to people, then things would change. Well, education without action isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit. We got the truth to people, all right, and it turned out to be nothing but a bunch of noise that was simply ignored, because the internet was where it stayed. Nobody ever did anything except tap on keyboards. Tapping on keyboards was no threat to them, we just let off steam and nothing changed. It is now crystal clear to any white man with two brain cells to rub together that the only thing that will make these dogs in power hear the word no is the sound of…”
Brigade

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are banking on the Americanisation of British politics, and I think they’re miscalculating.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You’re not as much in the wilderness as you think, Mark. It’s the Dissident right that has moved the mainstream to the Jewish Question.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I wouldn’t lend a jew my lighter, much less die for him. Imagine it.

1
0
MarcoEire
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
His father before him was the exact same.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran, in principle, doesn’t want to be anyone’s vassal. They want mutually beneficial relationships, not to be a junior partner.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
This relationship with Russia is new. Historically, Iran didn’t have options for buying a new airforce, plus they’re fixated on developing their own capabilities.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The jew stands atop a pile of dead children and declares “AND WHAT, GOY?”

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The strength of the jew is that he is bold, and he is willing to shock the enemy with acts of depravity that are unthinkable for normal people.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
There’s no nobility in Western leadership anymore. These decrepit democracies have allowed the lowest filth of society to take power. Good men, sound men, competent men, are locked out of power.

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
You can’t be pro-White and drive wedges between Western countries the way Trump does. He’s a diplomatic vandal.

1
0

@why
9 days ago
lol.. its a fun song

0
1

@Germanicus
9 days ago
Purimfest 2026, that’s what I’m calling it

1
0

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Howdy good folk

1
0
Natty
9 days ago
howdy troops

2
1

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Lana Loktef or Anna K….choose one

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
Dumb question on a channel like this. Anna K is a commie leftist no matter what her views
are on Israel and even Jews. She still believes Whites are evil. She is Anti-White! Lana, on the other hand, it 100% OUR PEOPLE. So, again, dumb question.

3
1
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re White enough, for goodness sake.

0
2
Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago(edited)
I generally like your comments, but as semite you’re non-White thus you have no place defining who is and is not “White”. That is OUR turf. Respect the boundaries (pun intended).

2
1

@why
9 days ago
jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
I LOVE JEWS

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bruh jews rock

0
3

@why
9 days ago
wtf

0
3

@why
9 days ago
jews behind it all????

0
3

@why
9 days ago
gubbermints

0
3

@why
9 days ago
bayonet up the bum is gonna feel like a good option

0
3
Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
6
Hide replies
– 🗲 GamerMosleyMomentUK 🗲 –
8 days ago
Maybe not all you Jews are paedophiles, but enough are that we can make these generalizations.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
brutal

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
o/

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
maybe switch every episode between players so all can play?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
good night volks

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
14

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That seems like an age ago

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers-of-the-soul, I call them. And they are mostly evil. It’s okay to say so.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is capable of going nut and ordering a nuclear strike. He kept asking about it during his first term, apparently.

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
I believe nuclear false flag first on USA, EU or bother, then they blame Iran and will nuke Iran.

1
0
Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
hahaha

Truth hurts
9 days ago(edited)
As far as the ” Greater Israel ” is concerned, Israel has every right to annexe terriories from Judea and Samaria,not because of ” biblical rights ” but because ever since Israel was created has faced constant aggressive wars from its neighbours..
When an aggresor wages a war and looses he has to pay a price.
Palestinians had many chances to create their own state yet they rejected everyone.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
“ever since Israel was created”
The creation of Israel was itself the original massive aggression which initiated all the interminable ongoing wars and unrest.
“Palestinians had many chances to create their own state”
The Zionists would never allow any viable, truly independent Palestinian state to arise. Such an option has never been on the negotiating table. The Zionist maximalists were determined to complete the ethnic cleansing of Palestine begun with the Nakba right from the beginning. Such hardliners have been openly running Israeli governments since Likud was first elected in 1977, and even before that exercised power from behind the scenes. For example, the creation of the Israeli nuclear weapon capability led by Shimon Perez at the behest of Ben Gurion; and the hardliner initiation of the 1967 Six Day War to take control of the West Bank and Golan Heights.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
So you think that when Israel was created in 1948 ,by concetration camps survivors and a few others and was attacked by 5 Arab countries ,it was able to conduct an aggressive war.Ok

Show reply
Truth hurts
9 days ago
So you guys think that if Israel is destroyed, UK and USA will be safer with the goat loving Agiadolahs, who beleive martyrdom and the 72 virgins ,being in charge of Iran’s nuclear arsenal.
That’s fine.

0
7
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
The only reason Muslims pose even the slightest threat to the US or UK is because Jewish-led elites have mass imported them into the US and UK as part of their Great Replacement. The Great Replacement is the Jewish master strategy for stealing White nations from their people. It is not merely Muslims being mass imported. It is infinity non-Whites, both Muslim and non-Muslim.
Jewish supremacism is the fundamental problem, never part of the solution.

2
0
Hide replies
Truth hurts
8 days ago
Wow .I didnt know that the Pakistanis and the Somalians are in the UK because of Israel. Thank you for letting me know.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Pakistanis and other immivaders are in the UK because of powerful British Jews and the treasonous elites like Tony Blair who are allied with them. Jewish supremacism includes but is very far from being limited to Zionism.

Hide replies
Truth hurts
7 days ago
Blair brought the Pakistanis
ok.

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
7 days ago
You really are clueless about history. There were some Pakistanis in Britain before Blair but it was Blair’s New Labor government which opened the floodgates to mass non-White immigration into the UK. I recall reading an article by Keith Woods a few years ago about this. He quoted statistics.

1
0
TDOF
5 days ago
Read:
https://archive.org/details/the-death-of-fragility-2nd-edition_202507

@ゼロHope
6 days ago
1:37:25
It is far more accurate to say Trump is saying, do as a I say and i’ll shot. There is no out option for Iran. It’s like “shame they won’t come to the table” but also Unconditional surrender, and we blew up the table and the guy negotiating with us.
There is nothing to negotiate. This is like the last time we attacked Iran, Trump started with the negotiating position of, “bomb yourself.” What is there to even to discuss? Especially after killing the pope-king of shia islam. You can’t simply do that, declare victory and leave. Everything of value with in striking distance, Iran will strike. They have choice, they couldn’t surrender if they wanted to.

Kevin
6 days ago
Ben Gavir currently in hospital and his house burning. so yes, we have seen such attacks

Kevin
6 days ago
they did hit one of the carriers with a drone, but they moved them too far away. why dont you know anything about what you are trying to talk about?

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia can’t produce infinite airplanes! come on! they don’t even have enough planes for their own war

Kevin
6 days ago
Russia is helping and Russia has made many public statements, they are just not covered. before the whole thing started every day Russia was sending plane after plane of weapons to them. Russia also spoke to Trump today and seems to have warned him they won’t let the US topple the government. right after Trump started talking about backing out.

@Kubatism
8 days ago
You are probably right, but the Venezuelan stuff also points to a broader context not discussed here – the China future war. All Chinese allies: Russia (bogged down in Ukraine), Venezuela (oil), Iran (supports Russian war effort and oil) you’ve got South Africa next (the current Afrikaner emigration policy of US, Ramaphosa humiliated) you’ve got only Brazil and India left – and India won’t help China

Alice1488
8 days ago
I love listening to Mark, Natty and Yuro! Actually real information about what’s going on! I pray that Isreal is nuked!

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
ALOHA SNACKBAR

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Warren Balogh is the master of this line of thinking

@Natty

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
The Colonel’s Fried Chicken was the best

0KT0BER
9 days ago
https://rocketreach.co/orla-minihane-email_748059991

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
DIdn’t he mention Ian Wright in particular?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
In British politics, crumbs from politicians feel like a slap up meal, alas.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
That agreement still has legal force in Libya, if the EU decides to keep up their part.

@vengeance
9 days ago
i dont though

@vengeance
9 days ago
dawson agrees with you mark

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I think every leader will get assassinated that are against jews. Remember that Austrian far right prime minister that was killed in a strange car crash?

Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
8 days ago
Jörg Haider, killed in a car crash in 2008 while leading the polls in elections to the Austrian parliament.
“[Haider] was Governor of Carinthia on two occasions, the long-time leader of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and later Chairman of the Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich, BZÖ), a breakaway party from the FPÖ….. Haider died in a car accident shortly after leading the BZÖ in the 2008 Austrian parliamentary elections.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s because he’s thick, Mark. It’s as simple as that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes Trump’s crass vulgarity and his lack of discretion and restraint have helped a lot.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
*more

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Lowe is a tory of the soul, and he’s on a journey. Perhaps he will do it.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
This stream is the funniest :joy:

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re not National Socialists, but they don’t need to be.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We crank anti-semites are vindicated. Years of naming them, against the protests of pearl-clutching rightoids is bearing fruit. Enjoy the compliment.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
the donmeh Turks were jews

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
i get it, shes right now though

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
kek

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s like a British person working for an Indian as a servant.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Natty
Yeah but working for people who genocided you shows a lack of self respect.

Natty
9 days ago

@utopia148800
everyone comes from somewhere buddy

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Come on Mark an Armenian woman working for Turks? I like people with self respect.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
She wants to be careful though. Sometimes, she’s seconds from throwing Romans.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
hahaha

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
NO HE IS GREEN!!!

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
She is Armenian

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
MAGA or MIGA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Tucker is a very naughty goy. He might end up having some sort of accident.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Tucker was recently denounced by Trum and kicked out of the “MAGA” movement.

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
The Iranians have developed small submarines that are essentially underwater “drones” with which they can target American ships. It’s not just missiles that are a threat to Americans.

@Stryker!
9 days ago
Had a boomer tell me yesterday: “thank g-d trump bombed Iran. My grandbabbies are safe” hhhhWuuuuut???

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
My beloved Ana. Watching her journey has been terrific.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
+his jewish mentor

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yep

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lots of Russian cargo planes delivered something to Iran

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
We don’t know because help would certainly not go through official channels. Who knows how much Russian aid actually is.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“You have the clock, but we have the time” – Some Ayatollah.

@bagelsandloxism
9 days ago
they have hypersonic Iran is an advanced country

@vengeance
9 days ago
there are no more missles. they cant be made any faster.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lawnmowers of mass destruction

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
they say 80%

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
then the party starts

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yeah they’ve used the old stock to drain the AD systems. The good stuff is yet to come, when the jews run out of American interceptors

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
I hope they wait for the interceptors to be used up first

@vengeance
9 days ago
death, death

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
lol

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or Mario

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Iran has no allies only jew controlled enemies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s becoming impossible for Iranian moderates to argue against getting the nuclear bomb.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
they suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
lol russia cant do shit

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It didn’t help Syria

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Sanctions – and historic Russian reluctance to sell them jets

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
because that costs a ton of money

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
I’m sure that fatwa still stands now that he’s dead.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Iran has this hyper-fixation on self-sufficiency. It’s noble, but it’s not always the best way.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
China will look at this shitshow and conclude that they’ll defeat the Americans if they attempt to stop unification with Taiwan.

Ulrich22
9 days ago
russia and the US suck

Ulrich22
9 days ago
endless whataboutism

@noreplacement
9 days ago
The heat pumps are good for some things. But not homes and DHW

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Heat pumps are noisy and do not get hot enough. We have one

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Winter in Europe will get interesting

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
110%

@Natty

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
can you imagine making love to jigsaw

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
imagine the smell…

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I wonder what his reaction was when he first saw her knob?

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
yuck.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Nihil sub sōle novum, governments have been doing this since the dawn of time since the first peasant revolts.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
he needed to attack before the midterms

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump is in constant touch with Laura Loomer, and he thinks that she is connected to the base and he listens to her jewish lies.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Franco,

@MarkCollett
Let’s not forget Franco. He lasted till the 70s.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@utopia148800
Doing that might be the point of no return.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
it depends how much murder the government is willing to commit and I think they will just start mass killing people.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
The Peace President

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Of course, everything was done on purpose, I wouldn’t be surprised if they said that the girls read Mein Kampf.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They could topple the regime. The monarchy is despised.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Murdoch Murdoch episode with the Trump train lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
LOL!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Andrew Neill looks like a clump of haemorrhoids

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
gross

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
HAHAHAHAHA

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They think they can make the state collapse, which means that they refuse to believe that Iran is a real, capable country. This tendency to underestimate and insult the enemy could be their undoing. They did the same with Yemen. They couldn’t understand the resilience of the Yemenis.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
shows the power of PR and sticking to the script

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they wanted to hit the girls school

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago

@utopia148800
yes!

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@why
who is that aimed at?

Natty
9 days ago

@why
do we?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Jagdtiger
I don’t know it’s all the same fake terrorist org working for israel

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
We’ve been assured they do “surgical strikes” for decades. Either they can, or they can’t – or they won’t. It’s clearly deliberate.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
“Iran military says Strait of Hormuz remains open, but any US, Israeli ship will be targeted” lol

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
9 days ago
yet you support faggots who want to blame women and hitler — like keith woods and nativist

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
isis k

@utopia148800

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
You guys remember when a jew was screaming at a Russia Today reporter that Russia will pay for supporting Iran than a few months later a giant ISIS terrorist attack was launched at a Russian Mall?

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
they did the legal games with the German soldiers after the war, too. Instead of POW, called them Disarmed Enemy Forces. To circumvent the Geneva conventions.

0KT0BER
9 days ago
Terror Cimbricus

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
I don’t think America actually has allies, but I think you hinted at that

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
always, because America is controlled by jews so they essentially act as jews.

@teja
9 days ago
Trump Judenknecht!

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Yes America does betray its “allies”.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
no people just have short memories, When Bush senior told the Shias to rebel against Saddam and America will help them than when they revolted Saddam brutally massacred them and America refused to help.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
I’m waiting for the sequel to USS Liberty

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Right.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It’s obvious now why Trump kidnapped and took over Venezuala. Oil

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump, with his bad-faith fake negotiations has changed America’s international standing forever. Who on earth would do a deal with them now? He’s a diplomatic arsonist. Look what he’s done to Canada.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein clique works too

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
They are using the term regime since Saddam

@why
9 days ago
what are we talking about guys?

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
And I imagine there no advisors around Trump who are willing to tell him things he doesn’t want to hear.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Trump hates nuance, and complexity, and he wants reality to match his simplistic hopes. He wants this to be easy, and he cannot accept that it isn’t easy at all.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
or, or, jews being stoned.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@why
hahah jews don’t think so. That’s why they had Sam Hyde fired.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They’re targeting the organs of the state: police stations, hospitals, etc.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Every Single Time

Obscure Truth
9 days ago
Yes, it’s amazing how they managed to conquer all those countries one by one.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
They are the government. The capital is theirs, and they act as the state.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I mean what do you except? Tommy is an ex convict and a petty criminal and fraudster. And He claims he is jewish.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
he went full jew slave. Bet he is circumcised too like a good slave.

@N-towerConstructor
9 days ago
Trump went full retard

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Hi Chief. I understand why people follow Tommy Robinson, jews are putting tens of millions of Pounds behind him and he has a large organization and social media boost. Essentially he has hundreds of liars on the payroll.

Chief Moody
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
That is true. lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@Chief_Moody
Tommy’s been on a coke bender since October 7. I’m not sure he’s slept for three years.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Roosevelt imploring him to use nuclear weapons against Germany but the letter sat on Roosevelt’s desk because Roosevelt has died overnight.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Andinia Plan

Chief Moody
9 days ago
Tommy Robinson and co have been very ghoulish over Iran. How people still support them, I’ll never understand.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Israelis are colonising Patagonia right now.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Japan had already offered surrender 3 times. They still nuked ’em

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real, Natty. Israeli journalists are happy to talk about it.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s real. They talk about it in Hebrew media.

Chief Moody
9 days ago
It’s very blatant what Israel are doing with Iran. It’s shameless at this point.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being desribed as America’s streetwalker is like getting pimped out by a literal whore

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
Well that actually happens once an opportunistic whore ages – she becomes a pimp.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Well, there is no planning for this war. The war aims change hour to hour, and Iraq was extremely well-organised.

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It’s always demoralizing to see conservative patriots in America viewing our country’s greatest ambition as being Israel’s bitch

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Yeah they just don’t care. What will the goyim do? Nothing.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
“The Dossier”. At least they had that.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Farage has been absolutely hysterical over this. “We have angered the Americans!”

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
9-11 made the anti-war position more difficult back then.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
Not me. The state of most young fatties, they won’t even make it to a hospice

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Has anyone else seen Asmongolds blatant warmongering?

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Once the Bush administration got away with lying about Sadam and terrorism ties and a complete fabrication of weapons of mass destruction, it was GAME OVER for government accountability.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Boomers using their final breaths to comment from their hospice beds.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
Plenty of young folk think that way too sadly

Hide replies
Capitalist Pigs + Communist Thugs = Jews
8 days ago
100%. GenX is largely Boomer 2.0

1
0
Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The Bahraini government is illegitimate, and delusional. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government falls during this conflict. The Bahraini people stand with Iran, by and large.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
There was a Yemeni calling in to a Bahrain TV show and the Bahrain TV host said there is no war in Bahrain

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Bibi WhataYahoo

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Netanyahu has such contempt for the goyim. The fact that he thinks Americans are stupid is becoming very obvious. A rational person wouldn’t buy a used car from him.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@noreplacement
The israelis and the the jew controlled countries hiding a damage.

@noreplacement
9 days ago

@utopia148800
that’s what I meant ha ha

MarcoEire
9 days ago
All true, I wish we weren’t inundated with ai slop of Tel Aviv

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
jews and degenerates; European America is in the past.

Natty
9 days ago

@noreplacement
it only looks that way

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
The absolute state of the USA…

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Winged Lawnmowers from Hell

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
I just want to see Tel Aviv flattened.

@noreplacement
9 days ago
It is difficult to find any Iranian fight back video. It all looks one way success for the Epstein coalition

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
The UAE is cracking down on videos; Bahrain has banned street gatherings; the jews are cracking down on footage of Tel Aviv. The true extent of this madness won’t be cleat until the dust – or sand – settles.

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
It’s hard to be circumspect, but it’s best to be cautious and not get one’s hopes up.

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago

@Aunt-Sally
haha you do it than.

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Yuro needs a wedgie tbh

MarcoEire
9 days ago
PURIM FEST 26

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
Evening volks!

MarcoEire
9 days ago
Excellent Germanicus

Secure the future of our people
9 days ago
It’s karma for Mark being very mean to Sam last stream!

Based and butterfly-pilled
9 days ago
Greetings fellow Social Nationalists

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
\o

Esau rising
9 days ago

@ArabSocialNationalist
o/

@Aunt-Sally
9 days ago
Natty

Natty
9 days ago
thats good lol

Arab Social Nationalist
9 days ago
Greetings war-weary goyim.

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
o/

@Jagdtiger
9 days ago
Epstein regime

@vengeance
9 days ago
o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

David Cameron: A reckless and dangerous thing for Iran to have done. And I think the whole world can see all these countries that have somehow wondered, well, you know what is the true nature of Iran? It’s there in black and white!

 

 

Interviewer: What would Britain do if a hostile nation flattened one of our consulates?

 

David Cameron: Well, we would take, you know, we would take the very strong action that.

 

 

Mark Collett: That was the slimy, two-faced Zionist puppet, David Cameron, bumbling his way through an interview as he tries to explain why Israel has the right to do whatever it wishes without consequence.

 

 

But he is after all, the former British Prime Minister who authorised an unprovoked military strike upon Libya in clear breach of international rules, which lead to the murder of its then president, Colonel Gaddafi, which plunged the country into chaos and resulted in a vast increase in the number of African migrants flooding into Europe.

 

 

But David Cameron is not an anomaly. He’s not the only one running defence for Israel. Everyone of note within the political establishment – and many outside out it – have all been busy crying their eyes out over Iran launching a military strike on Israel. And interestingly, all of these people have used remarkably similar terminology when discussing this issue, claiming that Iran’s use of military force was:

 

“Unprecedented, unwarranted and completely illegal.”

 

However, the truth is very different.

 

The Iranian strike on Israel was simultaneously justified, proportionate and completely warranted – because it was a retaliatory strike.

 

You see, what Israel’s cheerleaders don’t want to talk about is what the Iranian strike was in retaliation for. So let me illuminate you.

 

 

On April first an Israeli airstrike hit the Iranian embassy compound in Damascus destroying one of the buildings within the compound, resulting in the deaths of 16 people, including a senior commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, and seven other revolutionary guard officers. And two of those killed were civilians.

 

Now this missile strike on the Iranian embassy WAS unprecedented! And let’s find out why.

 

 

In 1961 the United Nation passed a treaty known as the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. In this treaty it is stated that embassies and consulates are “inviolable”. And in Article 22 of the treaty it states the following, and I quote:

 

“1. The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission.”

 

 

“2. The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity.”

 

“3. The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.”

 

End quote. That’s all pretty straight forward, but if you want it condensing into simple terms, it means that an embassy, or a consulate is sovereign ground and that those within it have diplomatic immunity. Crucially, this means an attack or raid on an embassy is against international law and as a result, could well be regarded as an act of war.

 

 

[03:40]

 

When applied to this case, it clearly shows that Israel has committed an international crime, has essentially declared war on Iran and has killed representatives of the Iranian military when they were on sovereign ground and had diplomatic immunity.

 

 

It is clear: Israel was in the wrong! Israel broke the law and Israel is the aggressor! And as such, Israel was widely condemned for this attack by a large number of countries and coalitions, including Russia, China, Italy, Indonesia, Turkey, Egypt, the Arab League, and the EU.

 

Laughably however, the United Kingdom used the attack on the embassy as a reason to criticise Iran – because of course, nothing can be the fault of Israel!

 

 

So, when Iran struck back, the strike was completely warranted. Which is why David Cameron couldn’t answer the simple question put to him at the beginning of this video, because he knew if he had answered it honestly, he would look like a liar and a hypocrite, and would not be able to justify his position.

 

But not only was Iran’s military strike absolutely warranted, it was also proportionate, as the Iranian strikes ONLY struck a single military target in Israel. And in fact, Iran only targeted the base from which the strike against the Iranian embassy originated. This was a measured, proportionate, and reasonable military retaliation to what was in fact an unprecedented act of aggression and provocation by Israel.

 

 

So, bearing in mind that:

 

Israel attacked Iran first.

 

Israel violated the 1961 Vienna Convention and broke International Law.

 

Israel killed not only Iranian military officers but also civilians.

 

And finally, that Iran’s response was not only measured, proportionate and reasonable – this all makes the British establishment’s pro-Israeli response look even more grovelling, hypocritical and ridiculous!

 

 

So bearing all that in mind, let’s hear what Rishi Sunak, the British Prime Minister, had to say about the Iranian strike in a statement made to Parliament. And I quote:

 

“On Saturday evening, Iran sought to plunge the Middle East into a new crisis. It launched a barrage of missiles and attack drones over Iraq and Jordan, and towards Israel. The scale of the attack, and the fact that it was targeted directly at Israel, are without precedent. It was a reckless and dangerous escalation! If it had succeeded, the fallout for regional security and the toll on Israeli citizens would have been catastrophic! But it did not succeed.”

 

“With this attack, Iran has once again shown it’s true colours. It is intent on sowing chaos in its own backyard – on further destabilising the Middle East.”

 

End quote. Sunak’s statement is not only ridiculous, but it makes him sound as if he is living in a parallel universe as it bears no relation to the truth of what happened.

 

 

But tellingly, Sunak’s response was not a strange exception, but in fact the rule when it comes to politicians discussing this issue. Equally delusional responses were issued by Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour Party, and from Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats.

 

 

Both Labour and the Lib-Dems were quick to condemn Iran in statements that read is if they had been prepared in Tel Aviv – WELL, PERHAPS THEY WERE!

 

[07:28]

 

This is another perfect example of the entire British establishment closing ranks, flipping reality on its head and ignoring international law in order to give their complete support to a foreign nation that has just committed murder. And now that Iran has retaliated, the British establishment is going all out to claim that they are aggressor! This would be unbelievable were it not for the involvement of Israel.

 

 

Because when Israel is involved, it’s clear that no matter what Israel does, both the UK and the US government will offer their unconditional support.

 

Israel breaks international law. Doesn’t matter!

 

Israel slaughters civilians. Doesn’t matter!

 

Israel bombs and murders aid workers. Doesn’t matter!

 

 

Israel sells missiles to Argentina in the middle of the Falkland war. Doesn’t matter!

 

Israel launches an unprovoked attack on a foreign nation, doesn’t matter!

 

And this all points to one fact: And I’ve said this before, and will say it again, it proves who holds real power over British politicians.

 

You see, one of the surest ways to ascertain who holds REAL power is to look at who is allowed to break the rules with complete impunity.

 

 

And there is no nation on this planet who breaks more rules, violates more laws, and disregards more moral codes than the state of Israel. Yet each and every time Israel does break the established rules, rules that all others are expected to follow, an exception is granted in Israel’s favour.

 

But despite the establishment maintaining the façade that Israel is the helpless victim and Iran is the aggressor, this narrative is no longer working like it used to. All you have to do is visit the YouTube channel of any mainstream broadcaster who has talked about this issue to witness a complete disconnect between what is being said on the screen and what is being said in the comments section below.

 

 

The establishment talking heads may be desperately trying to convince the public that Israel is the victim, but thankfully, Israel’s veil of victimhood is wearing thin, and finally the public are waking up to which nation is really the problem in the Middle East.

 

 

And even better, the public are finally starting to ask why every politician in Britain seems unable to speak the truth when it comes to Israel’s murderous and criminal actions.

 

[10:05]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/22/2024 = 39)

Earthling Carl
2 days ago
Cameron is a revolting subservient slave to Israel. The perfect Shabbos goy.

38
5
Hide replies
MagicManintheSky
2 days ago
Cameron is “proud” of his Jewish heritage.

22
1
Vettekid1488
2 days ago
one of many smh

12
9
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
2 days ago
Man is an absolute Pric who NEVER did a proper job the only job he had outside politics Daddy got him. Remember this creature brought in gay marriages/ adoptions. Decent Tories like Enoch or Alan Clark would be repulsed by him Had he been born on a council estate to a Single mum – he’d NEVER have got near parliament – talent less

8
0

@W_Poe_White
2 days ago
He’s got a LOT of competition.

4
0

@dsallen7
2 days ago
Israel did far more to provoke and instigate Iran than Germany ever did against any of the Allied nations.

31
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
2 days ago
so true

5
7
Euroicus
2 days ago
When the last jew is dead and their bloodline is extinguished, then and only then, the world will be free.

23
0

@BritishGammon
2 days ago
Iran targeted military bases. Israel targets hospitals and apartment blocks. There is a difference.

18
0

@Grumpole
2 days ago
One cannot get anywhere in politics unless one licks the zionist arse, has been this way since the Rothschilds bought the establishment in the 1800s.

12
0
Hide replies
Asadafa
2 days ago
There is a reason Rothschild was located in Frankfurt a. M. before they took over the UK: the Electors (Kurfuersten) met in Frankfurt, among other things, to elect the emperor (Kaiser, viz “caesar”) of the Holy Roman Empire. I recommend a search of the term “Hoffaktor” in wikipedia. Rothschild is not the only one that still exists today — with carefully unscrutinized holdings by the honest press. The Oppenheimer clan, for example, was a corrupter in Wuerttemberg and Vienna (where the Kaiser sat), as was Wertheimer. Many of these criminal elements made it over to the US and perpetuated their ethnoreligious criminality in the New World, aside from expansion into France and the UK.

6
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
2 days ago
Interesting information

5
0

@eclipseNF
2 days ago
Free Palestine

12
1

@Commander_Rockwell
2 days ago(edited)
Considering the actions of the Irish , it appears the English will continue to be peacefully going on to extinction , obeying ZOG and hoping for salvation by voting .. even if you get an MP or 2 , it wont change the course of White Genocide , we have to get a lot less civilized to beat the viscious hordes arrayed against us ..

9
2
Hide replies
Htrac
1 day ago
How are the actions of the Irish making the English going extinct?

Hide replies

@Commander_Rockwell
19 hours ago
i was saying if the English continue to be passive instead of copying the Irish , they will go extinct .. Im sorry it was unclear
, and it seems many are content to do so .. we have to take this genocide seriously

@W_Poe_White
2 days ago
It’s not just the myth/trope of Israeli victimhood that needs to be exposed as a lie. The myth/trope of Jewish victimhood needs to exposed for the Big Lie it is.
In the “pogroms” of history, it may be true that some individual ordinary Jews were not guilty of the crimes of their leaders and many other Jews, but it is doubtful that there is even one unprovoked “pogrom.” Jewish communities have always been guilty of crimes and transgressions against the people of the societies they had been allowed into.

8
0

@Commander_Rockwell
2 days ago
we must realize by now , there arent any rules at all .. we just imagine there are .. and it keeps us from doing what is necessary , pointing out double standards will not make any difference , it never has

7
0

@W_Poe_White
2 days ago
The UK was subordinated to ZOG long before the US was subordinated to ZOG. Thank Cromwell for letting (((them))) back in, thus opening the door for Nathan Rothschild. Also thank the English “nobility” for siding with Jews over their fellow countrymen.

7
0
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago
Nice one, Mark.
This is the Revolutionary Nationalist position -not least because it’s the truth.
The Grug-Nat take is: “Fk em, they’re brown and Muslim, innit. Fkn Arabs [even though they Persian]”
The more real Nats differentiate themselves from the Tommytard retards, the better.

13
9
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
2 days ago(edited)
I’ll keep saying it: The Jays would be fk all without sell-out White goys doing their bidding and zombie Whites perpetually keeping the Regime in power -of whom there are many.
This is exactly why I am NOT a “White Supreeemosist.”
I have zero interest in saving these scum.

9
9
Hide replies

@W_Poe_White
2 days ago
The Jews would lose their power over us if the money power (= control of the heights of financial capitalism, i.e. elite banks, the central bank, stock market, major investment funds, insurance, real estate) were taken from them. Conversely, if the money power is not taken from them they will continue to rule us from the shadows.
There is nothing genetically wrong with most of the cucked White people. They’ve been brainwashed and programmed by Jewish controlled media and schools.

6
0
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
2 days ago
Im NO Fan of islam being inside Europe- but when it comes to muslims I prefer the Persians to the Saudi hipócritas . When I did the 23&me the only Non White I had was 0.01 Irán - So my only non white is from a Based Trad Nationalist Nation – whom its hard not to have a grudging admiración for however much MSM demonizes them

5
0
Avalon
2 days ago
Fishy Sunak is not a British prime minister, he’s a puppet prime minister of Britain.

5
0

@Commander_Rockwell
2 days ago
the same old tactics that have failed for 100 years are not going to suddenly work now , only by radical means will we survive now

4
0

@Carlota
2 days ago
Cameron seems not only to be a weasel/puppet, he proved to have a room temperature IQ.

4
0
MagicManintheSky
2 days ago
Mark. The word is in-vi-ol-able not in-vi-able. Cheers.

4
0
ThinRedLine
2 days ago
Their evil empire is coming to an end

4
3
AurigaBooks
2 days ago
Get the back story –
“Zion’s Legacy” – Chapter 1: Seeds of Discord (book)

3
0

@amin
2 days ago
they’re all bloody crypto jews!

3
0
Htrac
1 day ago
Israel is desperate for another world war. And just like last time, our governments are all occupied by Zionists. The big difference to the 1930s/1940s is that the public have a lot more information, and won’t just believe everything the government and media say.

2
0

@nboeger
1 day ago
Iran did far too little. They should have turned the pedo-terrorist state of isreal into a glass parking lot. The world would have rejoiced.

2
0

@Gundobar
9 hours ago
all the traitors condemn it, that means it’s actually a good thing

1
0

@卐Der_Weg
1 day ago(edited)
Yes clearly but Iran is compromised as far as im concerned. another false flag to facilitate the third temple and potentially world war 3 with Russia and the US pit against themselves over Israel and Iran. not a single missle hit anything important. this iron dome non sense seems to be bullshit. if im wrong please provide me some semblance of proof. it can easily be turned into the prelude for “world peace” aka noahide and the world federation and the belt and road initiative

0
1
FLUMEN
2 days ago
thankfully islam regime is crumbling in iran, persians don’t have a muslim heritage

1
0
Vettekid1488
2 days ago
it’s all so surreal smh

4
3

@Deanfranjek
5 hours ago
Cameron should be in jail

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
That was really good. It appears Iran bombed the Israeli officer’s club as warning.

@NationlessNationalist
1 day ago

Neat info for the younger generation

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 1476

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Tue, Apr 23, 2024 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (39).

Mark Collett: Good evening everybody and hello and welcome to tonight’s book club. And tonight we are here live on Odyssey, live on DLive, and live on Radio Albion.com. And we are reviewing The Camp of the Saints.

 

Now this is a very, very famous book. And it’s, it’s not just famous because of its content, but it’s famous because of the people who read it, the people who were influenced by it. One of whom was Trump’s original strategist in the 2016 campaign, Steve Bannon. It’s one of these books as many have helped inform his opinions.

 

Now, as I said, we are live on Odyssey, DLive and Radio Albion.com. And tonight’s going to be an interesting stream. Hopefully people will have read the book. And remember, if you haven’t read the book, you can get it for free. It’s very, very expensive if you’re looking for a physical copy in English.

 

But there is a PDF copy and a full audio book up on my Telegram channel so basically you can get them from there. I know not everyone likes reading a PDF off a screen, but certainly I can’t see any problem with anybody reading the listening to the audiobook.

 

So if you have enjoyed this book and if you want to contribute to the stream in some way, you can do. And you can contribute to the stream by sending donations or questions either through Entropy, through Odyssey. Well, there are the only two ways. Any paid donation is gratefully received and will read out the comments live on air.

 

And if you write non-paid questions through Entropy, we will also deal with those if we’ve got time. And as this is the book club, it’s one of our smallest streams, it’s not one of the biggest streams we do, there usually is time for some of those.

 

So please let me know your thoughts as well, and we’ll take your feedback.

 

Now, as I said, this book is one of those very famous books. It’s one of those books that liberals really, really hate. And I actually found this a particularly interesting book for several reasons.

 

And one of those was because I’m actually a big fan of sort of monster or horror films. And I actually found that this book was structured a little like a monster or horror film, because most of the book is about this impending doom! It’s about this flotilla or fleet of beat up old vessels bringing migrants to France. And it’s about the way the nation reacts to that impending horror, and about how a nation decides to either defend their borders or to let in a large group of people.

 

Now this book was written in 1973. So many people would think it was quite prophetic. And some of the things in the book are some of them might be a little off, however, and we’re going to discuss all of that tonight.

 

Sadly, the author of this book is not on the show because he’s actually passed away, so he couldn’t be here even if he wanted to. So if anyone’s wondering why we haven’t got the author, we usually have the author, but obviously that would not be possible in this case.

 

Now, I did say there isn’t an English translation readily available for purchase, but that is something that Claymore Books is working on.

 

So if you are a fan of this book, please, please do either wait for that or get the audio or PDF copies free from my Telegram.

 

Now, we’ll start by going around the group. And we will begin with Natty. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? Did you have a good Christmas? Obviously we didn’t do a book club last month. Did you enjoy this book? What were your thoughts about this book and did you enjoy it?

 

[03:58]

 

Natty: Hi, guys. Yes, thank you, Mark. I had a wonderful Christmas. Very nice, cozy, family orientated Christmas. I’ve also just got back from a week on holiday as well, which let me listen to this book.

 

Going back to what you said quickly, before I give my thoughts on the book, I did actually look for a hard copy and I thought I’d brought a hard copy for about £17 off Amazon. Little did I know when it turned up it was the French language copy, which is relatively cheap and easy to buy.

 

However, like you said, the English copy, if you want to buy it, the only copies I could find were somewhere between 160 and £240. So any of our publishers who are going to publish this book I think is going to be worthwhile.

 

However, the copy I listened to, and I think the one you posted, is one Alex Linder from Vanguard Audio and it’s very well read and he interjects with fairly decent notes. He’s one of our guys. He understands the politics, as I think most of us do.

 

However, I think is something Sally is going to allude to, he does get some of the French words butchered to pieces, I guess, because he’s an American. So it makes for an interesting listen. But it is very well read by him and he does put the correct emphasis where it should be. He talks about if he has to make notes about it, he will. So it’s a very good audio book. If anyone wants to read it, I’m sure I’ll post a link at the end or I’m sure you’re going to post it.

 

As to the substance of the book. There’s a lot to like, and I think there’s a few glaring omissions which I’m sure we’re going to cover. I actually read this book three or four years ago and it was part of my red-pill journey, if you like.

 

But reading it again, it’s quite interesting the way you say it kind of reads as like a monster movie. You’re right. Kind of like a Sci-Fi book from the time, like a Robert Heinlein almost with this fleet that Jean Raspail, he kind of takes away the humanity of the fleet, if that makes sense. And these 800,000 Indians just become this one amorphous like blob in the book, of this evil intent that’s coming to the West to destroy it.

 

So it’s quite interesting. And the reactions of the people who are supposed to be in charge, and and how prescient it was, considering it was written in the 70s. As I was reading it you have to keep reminding yourself that this isn’t a book that was written two or three years ago when the migrant boats were crossing not just the English Channel, but the Mediterranean as well. But actually way before any of that happened, before the fall of Libya, and the killing of Gaddafi, which spurred that on. Raspail apparently had a vision of this happening and put it into this book almost 40 years ago, 45 years ago now.

 

So it’s crazy. It’s crazy that this book predicted so much and gets so much right. But like I said, there is one especially glaring emission, but I’m sure we’ll get to that.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, you keep saying that you see, I thought the glaring error was that fundamentally it has the people coming from India. He foresees this giant mass of people moving from the Indian subcontinent.

 

Whereas I think anyone writing this book today would have basically said it was a mix of people probably from the Middle East and Africa, flowing through North Africa, and they would be coming over sort of on a flotilla of sort of endless stream of small boats. That was, to me, the only thing that he seemed to really miss the mark on. But obviously he was predicting this at a different time. Anyway, we’ll get into that later.

 

And I do want to structure this one a bit more because I want to analyze sort of him as a prophetic character. I want to analyze the book in terms of its sort of power and whether people enjoyed it, but also the fact that I do find it to be written in a very, … Usually books are written as there’s a giant happening taking place. And that might be a world-wide happening, a nationwide or sometimes even sort of a galaxy spanning happening. But the story seems to zero in on individuals that do great things and change the course of that sort of nation, world, or galaxy spanning event like Star Wars. It centres in on Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, princess Leia and it tells their story.

 

Whereas I felt this always felt quite backed away. It didn’t deal with these micro plots and human side of things. It dealt with major national changes from a distance, which I found a very, very interesting way to write a book. But we can discuss that later.

 

Anyway, let’s move on to Aunt Sally. How are you doing Aunt Sally? Did you have a good Christmas. And what were your initial impressions of the book? Did you like it?

 

[09:48]

 

Aunt Sally: Hi, Mark. Hi, everybody. Yes, I did have a good Christmas. As far as the book goes, no, I hate it! I brutally hated it! I thought I’d waste hours of my life listening to it. It’s the first audio book I’ve ever listened to. So that was very much a different thing for me because I’m used to reading things, and when I don’t understand, I can turn back a few pages and go back and recap on what I’ve just read and make sense of it.

 

But with the audio, if I press rewind, it took me back to the beginning. It just didn’t didn’t work for me. So I didn’t like the audio. I didn’t really like the book at all. Sorry. Horrible! I wasted my life. 10 hours or something. [Natty chuckling] I tell you how bad it was for me, but quite often I listen to it in the bath and where it’s been cold. I get in the bath for about an hour. It’s the warmest place in the house. And I fell asleep virtually every time I was listening to it. And then I had to listen to it again in case I missed anything.

 

And what you said you liked the way it was structured. I hated the way it was structured! It was all over the place! It starts at the end, really, and it jumps. What you said about a horror film, because to me, that’s what I’ve written in my notes. It’s almost like a storyboard, like he expected it to be made into a movie or something. Or maybe he hoped that, I don’t know. But no, it’s been torture! Hated it. Horrible book. Horrible! Maybe it’s because I’m a woman and I’m playing girl card. It’s horrible.

 

Mark Collett: Do you think it was a bit dystopian Sci-Fi for you, Sally?

 

Aunt Sally: I like sci-fi. All my favourite movies are Sci-Fi. So no, it’s just trying to work out where the story is. 1 minute it’s in a press office, and another minute it’s on the ship. Each little batch of chapters that I listened to, I’m trying to work out where they are. It just didn’t grab me at all!

 

Mark Collett: Natty, if it didn’t grab Sally, what made it grab you?

 

Natty: Well, even as I was reading it, I thought Sally was going to hate it, but for other reasons. Although, Sally, you did say in our private chat that it was kind of very blokey, very male orientated. And I do understand what you’re saying, but as Mark said, it takes this great big event, this world changing event, and it tries to, I don’t know, have this snapshot of the I don’t know. It happens over the course of about a month or two months, and then it especially Zooms in on the last two or three days where the fleet actually arrives was Off the coast of southern France.

 

The focusing, the chopping and changing and going between different characters. And I think probably there’s five or six areas or characters and geographical locations. There’s a couple in Paris who are also towards the end, there’s an Arabic kind of crime lord, or community leader.

 

There’s the press stuff, which is quite interesting because you’ve got this old dinosaur Right-wing press guy or Right-wing in quotation marks who has almost zero circulation, whereas the direction of travel for every other press and newspaper and radio personality is very liberal, very progressive, very anti-racist. And this guy is kind of struggling against the tide.

 

You’ve got the old man on the coast. So what’s this, three plot-lines so far? The old man on the coast, who has a house in Provence, who watches his fleet, arrives and knows that his house and his village is just going to get destroyed by these people.

 

And then towards the end, there’s also the colonel of the army and the glorious last stand, which definitely is very male orientated.

 

I think Jean Raspail in his notes said that he didn’t want to let the West win at the end. He wanted it to be the disaster that he wrote about and he wanted it to, I don’t know, as a kind of shock as to make us think this could happen, the way everything structured, the way our leaders are, the way the Churches, this could absolutely happen.

 

And he wanted to deny victory for the old kind of knightly or elite ways of the West, which would have saved us. So instead he gave these six or seven men a glorious last stand. And I think they end up getting bombed by French fighter jets at the end and dying. Which is, maybe that’s a male fantasy of these guys who cling cling fast to their ideals right to the end in the face of this new, diverse, anti-racist Europe which swallows up everything.

 

And it’s not just France, it’s the rest of the world too.

 

However, coming back, the reason I thought you’d hate it is because the way I read it, it seemed to be attacking the Church pretty heavily. And I know that’s one of the things that you’re not a fan of so I don’t know what Jean Raspail thought about that. But as I was reading it, this is something that’s Sally was really, really going to hate. Yeah, sorry, go on, go on, Sally.

 

[15:49]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, as far as the Church goes, I would attack the Church as. Well, I mean, I’m no fan of the Church. Just because I’m a Christian doesn’t mean that I’m a fan of the Church. The church, all the Churches are apostate religions as far as I’m concerned. I’m a Christian, I’m a born again believer. So the Church is the last, … You wouldn’t get anyone further from I mean, I think what I was yeah, …

 

Natty: What I meant to say was it poured scorn on the Church and Christianity whilst ignoring [chuckling] another religion, which is why I thought maybe you wouldn’t like it. Or you would have seen through that and been pretty disappointed, or hated the book for that reason. Or hated the content of a book for that reason.

 

Aunt Sally: It’s funny because you’re right, he doesn’t mention the other religion. One presupposes reading it that the people, these Ganges, he calls them the Ganges refugees, that they’re all Hindu. I don’t know why I thought that, but that’s the only religion that I saw mentioned briefly. The other one wasn’t mentioned at all, was it?

 

Natty: No, not at all. I got that in my notes, but I’ll throw it back to Mark.

 

Mark Collett: He certainly didn’t mention a specific (((ethnic group))) that seems to be very intent on opening borders for others, whilst keeping their own borders closed, if that’s what you’re talking about. And I think that’s because of the very, very strict laws in France about mentioning those people in any respect.

 

So that might be where, …

 

Aunt Sally: We were talking about the religion of, sorry, Mark, we were talking about the “Religion of Peace” [Islam]. That one.

 

Natty: No, I wasn’t talking about who he was talking about.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s the reason why France has a very, very strict code of conduct when it comes to that kind of thing, and Jean Le Penn found that out.

 

So the way I read this book, and I do think, as I said, there were characters in it, but I never felt any of them were really fleshed out. I never felt you went on sort of a hero’s journey, or a villain’s journey for that matter. I never felt there was a decisive clash.

 

And I find that very interesting because when you read books, as I said, there’s often something happening on a macro level, but the book then focuses in on the micro level and how decisions by a number of hero characters change the course of history.

 

And I didn’t really find any heroes in this. There were people who wanted to stop this, but none of them were successful. There was the usual politicians who, despite people’s fears, did nothing about it and constantly talked about how this was actually going to make France a better place. I also thought that was interesting. It was almost like this guy, as I said, he was very, very prophetic.

 

And that is something I want to talk about because he predicted vast numbers of people coming to Europe, and I’ll take this from the Wikipedia, because this is very, very interesting. The migrants land in southern France and make their way north, and this is sort of an excerpt from the Wikipedia. It says:

 

“The immigrants make their way north, having no desire to assimilate to French culture, but continuing to demand a first world standard of living even as they flout laws, do not produce and murder French citizens, such as factory bosses, and shopkeepers, as well as the ordinary people who do not welcome them.

They are also joined by immigrants who already reside in Europe, as well as various Left-wing and anarchist groups across the West. More and more migrants arrive and have children rapidly growing to outnumber Whites. In a matter of months the White west has been overrun and pro-immigrant governments have been established while White people are ordered to share their houses and flats with immigrants.”

 

I’ve got to say that, …

 

Natty: Considering that was written in the 70s!

 

Mark Collett: I think the only thing at that point that he gets wrong is this happens over the course of months. And that might just be because he has to write a book, not a 40 part series. And obviously what we’re seeing isn’t taking place over months, it’s taking place over years. But it is the same thing.

 

But when you read that, and that is just the Wikipedia plot summary, so I’m not saying that’s equivalent to reading the book. But what I am saying is that little snapshot there is so on the money! And when I was born, I worked this out, I was born in 1980. And in 1980, Britain was around 95% White or White British. It was basically what we would describe as an ethno-state.

 

And if people had said to the average White Britain in 1980. Look, this is going to be the fate that White people will face by the 2020s, I don’t think many people would believe them. And this book was written in 1973. So a good seven years before I was born. So you would definitely be talking most Western European countries being easily 90% to 95%, maybe more, White. So this guy would you describe him as a prophet?

 

[21:39]

 

Natty: Well, he said, I think again, in the pre-book notes, or in his pre-word, he said it was almost like a vision that came to him. And I think one of the things to remember is, for whatever reason, and I’m sure more intelligent people will be able to drill down into this and know more about it than me, France seemed to be further along and more anti-racist, more accepting of the blacks from their former colonies in Africa than Britain was for whatever reason. Maybe they were 20 years ahead, 30 years ahead, whatever it was.

 

I mean, it’s all much of a likeness now, or maybe not, but certain their attitude was further along than we were. And I think probably for someone like Jean Raspail, who travelled to South America when he was little and travelled around and saw lots of different things and probably saw Paris. And as a writer, as a cultural contributor to kind of French writing, he probably had quite a good grasp on exactly how things would go down, which is why this book hit so hard, even though it was written way before anyone else could have said this was going to happen.

 

And for me, that makes it all the more jarring that the small hat tribe doesn’t get mentioned. He never once mentions kind of the jewish hands on the levers of power on the institutions. And I understand the reason why he can’t talk about that. But for anyone on, not the dissident Right, whatever you call it today, anyone who understands anything about the way politics works, reading this today, that’s one of the key takeaways one of the big omissions, big black holes in the middle of this book that kind of screams out to be filled.

 

He talks a lot about anarchists, and women’s libs, and lefties, and this kind of stuff, but absolutely no mention of jewish, …

 

[23:54]

 

Mark Collett: Well, that was another thing that got me. I don’t want to cut across you, but I was out at the big protest in Leeds at the weekend. I was obviously the final speaker at that protest because Patriotic Alternative, we were the ones who helped get that up and running. Wasn’t all us, but we certainly helped. And we brought the stage and everything.

 

And one thing that amazed me is at one point during that protest, or the rally, on that piece of common land, we were stood there and a group of Antifa charged across the road to attack us. Now, they were repelled by a mixture of football lads and locals who had come out, who actually gave the Antifa a bit of a hiding.

 

But then the police actually arrested the Antifa, and I think it was four or five of them actually were arrested. And the police immediately raised a dispersal order for anybody who wasn’t a nationalist, which is very interesting, certainly went in our favour on the day.

 

But one thing I find really, really interesting about this novel is that he linked all of these things together. And I was there, obviously, on Saturday. Behind me was a hotel filled with migrants, and there on their side were these anarchists, these Leftists, these anti-fascists. And I was speaking to young girls, to men, to women, in the area who were telling me about how they knew people who had been accosted, menaced, basically threatened by the migrants.

 

And there it was, these lefties defending them, defending their rights to be here. And to sort of put all of this together in 1973, I just find it pretty incredible! The whole book had lots of little bits in it that made me think this guy almost had a time machine [chuckling]!

 

So sorry, carry on Natty. That I just wanted to raise that point because this book was literally a snapshot of what he was saying was taking place in Leeds at the weekend!

 

Natty: Yeah, I totally agree. It’s going to be one thing that keeps coming up over and over again during this discussion is that he totally nails the way it is. And it would have been true five years ago. And I know that this book came to prominence, like you said, because I think Steve Bannon quoted it, or said it was part of his inspiration, and a lot of people read it after that.

 

Mark Collett: It was a book that when I was in the BNP, it was a book that was sold then and recommended then as well. It was known in dissident Right circles, but Bannon really pushed it into the stratosphere.

 

Natty: Yeah, well, that totally makes sense. But you’re right. Just like you said, this is on the eve of less than one day ago, you’re protesting potentially criminal migrants being housed in your neighbourhoods, and on their side of these Lefty anarchists, Antifa, whoever they are. And yet Jean Raspail writes exactly this situation, however many years ago it was.

 

And one of the vignettes, the kind of character interactions that happens towards the end of the book is this Lefty anarchist kind of faces off against the military forces that are on the coast. And he’s got a whole band of anarchist brigands who are just there to have fun and welcome these migrants. On the other side is this general, this colonel in the army, this Dragaris, I think he’s called, but he’s got a dwindling supply of men because they keep deserting and running away. But he’s pretty staunch and he’s pretty steadfast.

 

Mark Collett: But yeah, I just want to bring this up as well while you’re talking about the defense of the beaches. One thing I found really interesting in this, a lot of people in France are scared that this is going to happen. And I found this a wonderful sort of twist in the book that the French President basically orders the troops to go to the beaches. And you’re thinking, are they going to make a brave last stand?

 

But then he says:

 

“I will leave it down to every man’s conscience what they do.”

 

And instead, with that last twist, the President basically causes this mass desertion. And most of the army just throw their weapons down and run, don’t they?

 

Natty: Yeah, I guess it’s the start of the third act, and it’s alluded to throughout the rest of the book, but the eve before the migrants land. They’ve already beached the boats, but they’re waiting to come ashore on, I think it’s Easter Sunday. And everyone in France and everyone in the rest of the world because this event has triggered this kind of diverse uprising throughout the rest of the Western world. I think there’s demonstrations in London and New York.

 

So everyone’s tuned in to the President’s final message he’s going to give the country, although you don’t know it’s final, because it could have been that they could have pulled back from the brink. They could have stood up and blown these people away and gone and waged war on them. But like you said, he almost does it.

 

But then at the last, during his speech, he has this kind of change of heart where he says:

 

“I’m not going to order you to shoot them, it’s up to you.”

 

And because of this and because of this psychological experiment they carry out with the Navy, a few chapters previous, they realize that they can’t do it, they can’t shoot these poor unarmed people and these women and children who are storming up the beaches.

 

So you’re right, this triggers this waves of desertion. But one of the recurring themes throughout the book that’s kind of going maybe off topic here that we can get into I’m not sure if you guys have got notes on it, is the way that the fleet this horde of Hindus on the fleet is actually really violent, and uncaring, and unfeeling, and murders quite a few people on the docks as they’re boarding in India, on the crossing itself as this kind of this western fleet of do good rock bands and pope and all these other people try and board and give them supplies. They actually throw corpses over the side and beat one of the guys to death and all the rest of it.

 

But this is all hidden by the media because they don’t want the French people or the European people to see that this supposed poor, we just need help, we’re so weak and feeble. They don’t want these people to see that these are really nasty people and they’re capable of some really nasty things if they reach our shores.

 

And it’s like again, we come back to it, it’s so on the nose! It’s right there! He was writing about things that are happening exactly the way they’re happening now.

 

[31:22]

 

Mark Collett: Sally, what’s your thoughts about this thing? Would you call Jean Raspail a prophet? Do you think he was ahead of his time? I know you didn’t enjoy the book, but did you take anything positive from the book in terms of his ability to predict this nightmare future?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I think definitely, I’ve written that. I’ve got notes all over the place. But I’ve written many times:

 

“How did he know? How did he know that?”

 

And especially when you think he wrote it I think it was 1972. I’ve written down but you said 1973. But he must have thought about it years before. So the idea of the book probably a few years, and how did he know? How how did he know? Even the liberal thing about the liberals and, you know, that the women that were standing up for the refugees. He knew I grew up in this time. He was actually my father’s age, but he couldn’t have seen that. I know he travelled a lot, but I don’t know what on earth he could have seen that made him write it.

 

The other thing no one’s mentioned is that the refugees were men, women and children. They wasn’t just hordes of fighting age men. That’s a difference. I mean, I’m not sure what the proportion of women and children were, but women and children are mentioned a lot.

 

There’s one scene in it that they’re all having sex. Why am I listening to this? It is just horrible. [chuckling] But, yeah, much of it. You know what which bit I’m talking about in our tips. What the hell’s this? Why would they be doing that?

 

Natty: It’s pretty disgusting the way it’s written as well. He talks about semen flowing over brown bodies, and children involved and everything else. It’s really horrible!

 

Aunt Sally: The other thing is, he’s got a clear hatred, I think, hatred of people from India, because there’s barely a nice word about them. It made me think something must have happened to him that made him write like that, because he doesn’t talk about other, he doesn’t really mention any other races. There’s no Africans in there, is there? It’s all from people from the Ganges, that’s what he’s calling them.

 

And it’s like, why would they come from the Ganges? That was my big thing. Why would they go to France? I think the reasons were covered in the early chapters, where it was because they want what they’re entitled to. They want a share of the West’s wealth because they deserve it and they’re entitled to it. And I’m thinking, well, the Indians, why would they blame France? Surely they would be coming to England? Why France? I never really understood that. I don’t know if you did, Natty, because that really didn’t make sense to me, that it was Indians and not another race.

 

[34:38]

 

Natty: I don’t know where I read this, but I think I read that Jean Raspail actually chose to make it Indians, because making it Africans or sub-Saharan Africans, or North Africans would have been too easy, I think. Or they’re too alien. I think that’s paraphrasing what he said about it.

 

But then, strangely enough, the way he dehumanizes the Indians, you’re absolutely right. He couldn’t have written about them in a worse way. I think they’re eating poo and cooking with poo, I think there’s cannibalism on the fleet as well. This is one of the other things, …

 

Mark Collett: It’s every horror imaginable, isn’t it? The way he talks about them is this sort of floating ramshackle. And I’ve got to say this, one thing that I really liked as well is that they’re only able to get to the West because the West once colonized their part of the world and left these rotting boats there.

 

So there are all these old ramshackle boats that were once used by Western explorers and shipping companies that have just been dumped there. And they board them almost like a fleet of these boats, and they’re all sort of decaying. And some of them are sort of like lashed together to make them slightly more seaworthy. And they just set off on this slow journey.

 

But I did like the fact that it was almost sort of like the things we left behind for them, they use against us. I thought that was another subtle part of it. Sorry, carry on.

 

Aunt Sally: Even then, they’ve seized these ships, these rust buckets, I think he calls them, somewhere. But the amount of food that they would have, an organization that they would have had to have to bring those ships as far as France, that is fantasy, isn’t it? It just wouldn’t have been possible if these people were that starving, that they’re leaving their homeland to go to France for what they think is their fair share of Western wealth.

 

How on earth, could they afford to fill that ship with the food that they would have needed to get it sailing. And the fuel and the food and everything else? They couldn’t have been as poor. They couldn’t be that poor, could they? That didn’t make sense. Things have to make sense and add up to me. And it just, …

 

Natty: Sure, I know exactly what you mean. I’ve got this written down, actually, in that, …

 

Aunt Sally: You could probably explain it better. Yeah.

 

Natty: He gives a Ganges fleet this kind of constant miracle. He grants them constant miracles in order to get them where they need to be.

 

So I think the initial incident is this thing that happens at the Belgium embassy, where they say:

 

“We’re not taking any more orphans from India back to Belgium.”

 

And this triggers a stampede. A shot is fired and Agent Provocateurs actually whip up the crowd. Don’t just whip up the crowd, they whip up the whole of Delhi or wherever it is on the Ganges. Maybe it’s not Delhi. Into storming the docks.

 

Now, the fleet, it says, I think the numbers are 800,000, spread over 100 boats of varying sizes. Most boats carrying more than 1000 people each, obviously. But the speed that it travels, he does allude to the fact that thousands die on the route and they’re just even used as fire-lighting material, or thrown over the edge or eaten in some cases. And the fact that there’s no weather that stops this fleet, there’s no storms, there’s no anything that impedes this fleet in the slightest, it just makes its way there. There’s no talk about fuel, there’s no talk about leadership, …

 

Mark Collett: I read this completely differently to you. Carry on, then I’m going to give a slightly different story.

 

Natty: So, in my opinion, I mean, Jean Raspail, and I had this kind of theory as I was reading it, that maybe his granting the fleet this kind of just mythical ability to travel was maybe a cover for the JQ, in that it would have been NGOs helping these people out and buying fuel for them and supplying with food.

 

But in the book, they just manage it. It happens for them. I’ll be interested to hear what you’ve got to say about it.

 

[39:34]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I didn’t see it as something as complex as that. And I said I saw this as a bit like a horror film. And I’ll talk about what I mean. Often, something like, say, Jaws. You know, this monster is out there, you know, it’s coming. And throughout the film, you don’t really see the monster head on and the sort of true level of carnage it can cause.

 

I’ll give you a good example of a film like that. The recent first in the new Godzilla films, you saw lots of things sort of like telling you that something bad was going to happen. But it wasn’t until the end when you saw the true carnage of Godzilla sort of crashing through an American city. And I kind of felt that this film was like that, in that you knew that this monstrous human tide was coming, but you only saw it sort of crash on the beaches and the chaos toward the end of the book.

 

And one thing about a monster film that can make you feel unsettled is when the beast is relentless and unstoppable. And no matter what happens or no matter what you think might throw it off, it just keeps advancing.

 

So in horror films, you kind of have characters like Michael Myers who doesn’t matter how or Jason Voyage doesn’t matter how many times they’re shot or who chops at them with an axe or who hits them with a bat. They just keep coming relentlessly.

 

And I felt that Raspail sort of ascribed, like you say, it’s almost a horrifying, mythical, supernatural power to this fleet. But I also felt he did something else. He made it feel, by the end of the book, as you realize it’s coming, it’s coming, it’s coming, and it’s building in your stomach that this monster from like a horror film is unstoppable and it’s coming and it’s relentless.

 

But also from our point of view, from a racial point of view, an ethnic point of view, he made this feel inevitable. He made it feel like whatever you do, there is no turning this back! There is no changing this. This is the fate of the West. The West is fated to die! The West is fated to be defeated, to be destroyed at the hands of mass immigration, fueled by traitorous politicians.

 

And although he makes it clear that really in their heart of hearts, whether they express it or not, the vast majority of the normal French people who weren’t part of the government or weren’t part of these anarchist or liberal groups, they didn’t want it. But they just didn’t feel as if they could do anything other than flee, which I took as sort of a signal of White flight. And the way they moved north through the country with the White French fleeing north, thinking they could escape this if they got far enough north.

 

Basically, that’s what happens in Britain, isn’t it? They turn upon our southern coast and as they move north, people flee north! If I get to Yorkshire, I’ll be fine. Well, if I get to the northeast, I’ll be fine. Well, if I get to Scotland, I’ll be fine. And eventually it’ll be well, if I get to the Outer Hebrides, they won’t follow us there! But they follow you everywhere.

 

And I kind of felt, … Maybe a better way to put it is like The Terminator from obviously The Terminator films, this unstoppable force. And it really did sort of hit me that Raspail was saying:

 

“By the time this is all happening, it will already be too late to stop it!”

 

And I kind of saw this as his way of saying that this is a grim inevitability for the West. It’s the monster that you won’t be able to stop. But ironically, he more or less alludes to the fact it was a monster created by the West out of our own altruism, out of our own colonization, out of our own liberalism.

 

That’s how I saw it. I didn’t think there was anything more complex, hidden. But I did think he made it very much. This ever advancing terror, unstoppable terror, that was our destiny. Our destiny was to be destroyed by a monster of her own making. Have I got that completely wrong? I’ll ask both of you that question.

 

[44:11]

 

Natty: Well, funnily enough, one of the things that does differentiate it from today, is how much power the media personalities have, right? So the newspaper men and the radio, the radio people and the occasional address by this ambassador from India, or the ambassador from Belgium, or some minister from France is able to sway public opinion in a way that we wouldn’t really understand now, given that we’ve all got phones and Internet and the dissemination of information and news sources wide reaching and wherever you can get your information from wherever.

 

But one of the things that does keep the French from complaining too loudly and sway’s opinion is these big personalities, whether they’re on the radio or whether they’re in the newspapers of the time. And again, this is written in the 70s, so it’s understandable that those channels of communication or mass media were controlled that way.

 

And it’s actually one of the I’ll make this topical about recent times. One of the things we’re kind of grappling with right now is that certain sources of information or cultural touchstones for us, like the Babylon Bee, like maybe Steven Crowder, some other people who you kind of assume are on the dissident Right, or your side are being exposed as just bad actors. They’re supposed thought leaders, but they’re not good for you and they’re leading you down the wrong path and trying to divert you, act as gatekeepers and all the rest of it.

 

And it’s something that we have, I think since 2015, 2016, have been grappling with this and slowly exposing people. It’s very rare that someone can come on the scene now or turn up with a Telegram channel or turn up in someone’s media project, and not have questions asked about who they are, where they’ve come from or who’s funding them or any of that stuff. So again, it’s one of the things in this book that doesn’t sit right with the way things are today.

 

But you’re right, the people there are totally betrayed and their opinions are swayed by these people who stop them resisting, which is really interesting. And it’s the same thing they would try and do now, and they still do try and do now by banning people off social media, restricting their access.

 

Mark Collett: But I was just going to cut in there, mate. I do think there are increasingly people who don’t listen, but you’ve got to remember, I mean, just look at Piers Morgan. I mean, people joke that he’s the Gammon Whisperer, that he’s the one that when the public are actually at that point of snapping over something, he does an interview and sort of calms it down, or:

 

“Well, they’re not all bad. And this one here that I’ve got on the show, he’s not like the other ones.”

 

And do you still think, though, that there are some celebrities like that? There are Morgans, there are the Peter Hitchens, there are these sort of centrist people who would calm others.

 

And I’ll give you an example. I was on Twitter just looking at the response to our protest in Leeds at the weekend, and there was I don’t know whether this person really is a woman or if it really is the person who the account claims to be. But they were saying:

 

“Oh, well, I am completely against these migrants, but the idea of protesting outside a migrant hotel is disgusting! It’s anti-British! You are meant to be standing for the British people, but what you’re doing is the most anti-British thing! That’s their home. No British man, no decent British man would go out there and actually protest outside somebody’s home, making them feel uncomfortable. This is the most wickedly, un-British thing ever! Hang your heads in shame!”

 

And I looked at that and thought:

 

“That’s a very carefully constructed argument.”

 

But that’s the kind of argument that is designed to calm people into completing inaction.

 

And although I think that maybe the media doesn’t have the power it used to, there are still media figureheads. And I do still think there are, you know, subversive agents out there spreading this nonsense. The kind of people that will say:

 

“Well, I walked into the Gulag with my head held high and a smile on my face, because at least they couldn’t call me racist!”

 

And you’re thinking:

 

“So you did nothing for the last, 20 years except for agreeing with the government. Then the last moment, you made some meek protests and let them cart you off to the Gulag.”

 

Well, if you’d be a little less bothered about being called a racist for the last, 20 years, we could have actually done something. And I do think there are other things that sort of have emerged as sort of mind control devices that would stop people taking action, even in a horrific case like this, where there is literally an invasion fleet on its way.

 

[49:19]

 

Aunt Sally: One of the things about the book that did strike me was the word “racism” and the fact that he wrote it when Enoch Powell made that famous speech, And I asked my mum, what’s “racism”, and she said:

 

“It’s people that don’t like black people.”

 

And I said:

 

“Does that mean your one?”

 

And she said:

 

“Yes!”

 

And I thought:

 

“Oh!”

 

And then there was this drive from the press that Enoch Powell’s a racist and this and that. And that’s when that word first became for me, was a thing like, you mustn’t be a racist, they’re the worst things ever.

 

But he knew, he must have known that that word was the tool that was going to lead to political correctness and excuses for not standing up for what’s right and wrong for your own race. He knew it. He knew a lot. It just makes me think what I’ll always wonder, where did he get his knowledge from? How? I mean he travelled? I wonder what he saw. He knew too much and I’d love to know how he knew it.

 

And it crossed my mind that maybe he got some of it from the Bible? Some of what’s happening from the Bible? From Revelations in particular. Yeah, there’s a bit in Revelations about nation on nation, nation on nation being race against race. That’s what it means. But, yeah, I do think he got it from there. I forgot what was going to say next. So carry on.

 

Natty: I think we were talking about the fact that the people in France were betrayed by the media and their politicians. And actually that is going to lead me on to say something else, or kind of change the direction of this thing.

 

Mark, you talk about the fact that the fleet is kind of this creeping horror that’s going to end up in France, I think I guess Raspail chose France because it was his country. He understood it. He understood how beautiful the southern coast was in Provence and this total juxtaposition of this fleet of tramp steamers filled with emaciated brown Indian people covered in semen and poop, [chuckling] wading ashore into Provence, into one of arguably the most beautiful coastal regions in the world, the most well maintained and the most gorgeous, the best climate in the world.

 

But as always, and this is a theme that’s true in any major shift in history, it’s not the outsider that does you in, in the end, it’s your own countrymen! It’s the traitors inside your country. It’s the media. There’s one odious character called Clement Dio who’s a kind of mixed race, wealthy newspaper guy, who’s constantly attacking nationalists or people with nationalist sentiments.

 

There’s an incident with Arabs in a swimming pool and he just ruthlessly goes after, using his newspaper, he goes after the town council for trying to ban these Arabs from the swimming pool because it’s spreading syphilis and their pestering girls and stuff. So there’s this horrible anti-White mixed race guy called Clement Dio who eventually gets his comeuppance. And that’s one of the good things about this book, is that a lot of the scumbags and people who screw France over and screw Europe over, end up getting killed and brutalized. And I think that was Jean Raspail’s way of having his own version of revenge on these people, even if the West did fall.

 

[53:31]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I thought that was very realistic! Because all the people you see this in the in the UK, when you see these sort of liberal White women go on these BLM marches and something horrific happens to them all. And these things do happen! And I thought again, I didn’t think it was his way of getting revenge. I just thought it was prophetic. I thought that eventually the liberals meeting their end at the policies they advocated for was absolutely true.

 

And you could take that and you see it’s when I read bits like that, I’m not sure whether he was prophetic or just very good at reading history, because obviously that brings you to sort of the Haitian Revolution, where during the Haitian Revolution, the blacks, the mixed race and White collaborators took power over Haiti.

 

But as soon as they had taken power, it wasn’t long before the blacks and the mixed race did away with the White collaborators. So even the Whites that helped them, they then did away with. And shortly afterwards, many of the mixed race were also killed because they formed a strata above the black Haitians.

 

And it is with an understanding of history that you do start to look at this and say, maybe he did base certain aspects, not say, the migrant flotilla or anything like that. I mean, that would be unprecedented in his time. But there were certain historical aspects to the book, like the Haitian revolution, which I think he would have had a very strong knowledge of.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. Yeah, absolutely. And you kind of think about the people in this country. Now you extrapolate, we think, well, maybe not this country, but someone like Sean King or, …

 

Mark Collett: Sorry to butt in mate, sorry, sorry to butt in, but I just wanted to point out as well the reason he would have had such a great knowledge of the Haitian revolution, because obviously that was an insurrection against French colonial rule. So that may well have been something that as a Frenchman of that era, he was very well read on, because Haiti was originally a French colony. And the French there that did side with the revolutionaries were killed shortly afterwards.

 

Natty: Yeah, absolutely.

 

Aunt Sally: That makes sense. That answers my question, because it’s one of the things I was wondering, where did he get all this from? What made him write this book? Where did the ideas come from? It must have come from that, and he might have known people.

 

Natty: Well, if you think about what would happen to someone like Akala, or Alfa Hirsch, or Ash Sarkar, for instance. If this was to happen in the same way as the book, and even in different ways, these people wouldn’t be needed. They’ve been stabbing and jabbing at the stumbling, the shuffling kind of walking catastrophe that is the UK. And these guys have been jabbing their knives in and trying to draw blood.

 

But come any sort of revolution that these people would cheer on, they’d be the first to go. They wouldn’t have any place. And I think Jean Raspail understood that, especially in what happens to Clement Dio, which is his kind of personification of all of these people. Like you say, the White collaborator.

 

In Clementio’s case, he’s a mixed race, but he runs into a gang of escaped criminals, many of them black or Africans, who have been let out of his prison. And at first he’s kind of jokey and matey with him. And I think he’s got a Chinese wife with him who’s very attractive, and they start drinking together. And by the end of it, he’s beaten up and locked in an upstairs room and they’re downstairs in the bar raping his wife for three days. I can’t remember if he dies afterwards or whether they kill him or what happens.

 

But again, this is before the fleet even lands. So the army has its teeth taken away by the President, by the media, by the people of Provence running away, because they don’t have the have the stomach, or the heart, or the institutions behind them to stand up for themselves and defend their own patch of land.

 

So the French army has the artillery, has the navy, it has all these prestigious regiments who have travelled around the world and conquered and gone to war, but it’s not the problem that they’ve got of that. And they’re facing this fleet. Everything behind them has collapsed and the people inside the country have turned against them, essentially, and they can’t defend their land anymore. They don’t have the moral fortitude, they don’t have the institutions on their side. They don’t have the backing of anyone.

 

And in that case, if the enemy at your front is easy to see, but the enemy at your back is one that’s just constantly stabbing you and taking away your troops and trying to cause desertions and all the rest of it and sabotaging your supply lines. You can see why everything just fell apart at the end of a book and happened the way it did.

 

Mark Collett: Do you have anything to add on that one, Aunt Sally?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. No, I think most of the book seems to centre around the actual journey, the journey and what’s happening in press offices and governments. That’s all politics. And I hate politics! I really do. But it was all about this impending doom.

 

And if it did remind me of any horror movie, it was Walking Dead. It’s just like they keep coming, they keep coming. And then when they think they’ve got rid of all the hordes of zombies. There’s more coming. There’s more coming. It was all this impending doom and gloom that’s coming and then accepting their fate, they’re not going to make a stand. They’re not going to fight. They’re not going to fight for it. I’d understand that if it was men, women and children, which it was, I’d get it.

 

What would happen if that was the case? If this flotilla of people, real, genuine refugees, were coming from the Ganges and they were men, women and children, then different governments would plan where they’re going to go and make the rest of Europe take some of them, not just allow them all to land in France. So, again, when things don’t make sense to me, I can’t really take it seriously. It’s like this whole flotilla is going to France. Why?

 

[1:01:02]

 

Natty: I think that was one of the reasons why Raspail wrote it Sal. The way he did so was he deliberately took those decisions away from the governments of the West. Every interaction they try and have with the fleet is ignored. They don’t want anything to do with help, or aid, or anything else. There’s no radios on board the fleet. They’re just going where they go.

 

And interestingly, an incident where it looks like they might be heading for the Suez Canal. I don’t know if you guys remember this part of the book. But the Egyptian government only has one navy boat. So it’s got this old Second World War destroyer that’s kind of on its last legs. It’s been afloat for the last 40, or 50 years. It’s barely held together. And it’s the one navy boat that Egypt possesses.

 

But the Egyptian government, which still has some balls and does not want these people in their country and is still led by people who are willing to say as much, doesn’t want this fleet coming through the Suez Canal and ending up grounding. And then they’ll have to deal with it.

 

So the Egyptian government sends out this single navy boat and tells the captain:

 

“You stop that fleet and you turn it around by any means necessary!”

 

And the guy pulls up alongside. Again, there’s no radios. So he just shouts over the loud hailer and fires like a stream of antiaircraft, like cannon fire over the bridge. And the kind of crippled quadriplegic who’s in charge [chuckling] of this fleet is shocked into turning it around.

 

So this show of force by this crappy beat up old navy boat. But because the person who’s in charge of that boat and the person who’s giving him his orders is prepared to do what’s necessary. They managed to turn this fleet around and avert disaster for Egypt.

 

And there’s absolutely none of that will, or backbone in the West anywhere to make that kind of decision! France ends up getting the refugees. So it’s this interesting juxtaposition between the Egyptian navy, which achieves it’s aim with one rusty old tub with like an antiaircraft gun on it, versus the entire fleets of Western Europe who are utterly toothless and can’t do a single thing about it.

 

Mark Collett: I thought that was interesting as well. And something else I liked about the book. And I’ve talked about this many times before on streams. And when I’ve appeared on other people’s, shows. That this book, although it does take place primarily in France, by the end of the book, he’s made it clear that virtually every Western nation has been consumed by this. This sort of flotilla leads to sort of a knock on effect which basically destroys everything. And the last holdout is Switzerland.

 

But eventually, because every other country is now completely overrun with migrants and liberals and has succumbed to this nightmare, Switzerland is seen as this rogue state and basically that is forced to capitulate as well. And eventually everywhere succumbs to this nightmare.

 

And I thought that was really important too, and I speak about this quite a lot, as I said, on other streams and shows that this is a White issue. And a lot of people say:

 

“Oh, Mark, you shouldn’t talk with all these Americans and people from overseas, you should stick to just what’s going on in Britain!”

 

But this isn’t a British problem. And I thought Jean Raspail made it very clear that this wasn’t just a French problem in the book. That this led to absolute world-wide changes! Every Western nation ends up succumbing to this madness! Every Western nation ends up being crushed under this tidal wave of migrants! And really what could be described as anti-White policy.

 

[1:05:20]

 

And I thought that was very interesting too, because he realized in 1973 that despite what he felt was coming to France, that everywhere would go along with this, that you wouldn’t have Britain as an outlier, you wouldn’t have a resurgence of militant nationalism in Germany that would save Germany. America wouldn’t stand alone as the last bastion of the White nuclear family in their quaint houses with white picket fences. He knew this was going to be something that would essentially affect what would be described as the whole Western world.

 

And I do think that’s a very, very important point. And it’s also very indicative of his level of understanding of this problem, that it isn’t a madness that just affects a country, it’s a madness that infects, or an ethnicity for that matter. It doesn’t just affect the English. But it’s passed over the Scottish. This is a madness that infects our entire race!

 

And at the end of the book, essentially the whole West has sunk. He more, or less, says that. But you would think there be some small communities in parts of America, that would stand strong against it and remain there during the collapse of civilization. But obviously we’ll never know. I don’t believe unless he tells me otherwise, that. He did a follow up about any resistance. I think he left it at the end with complete destruction. In very many ways, as Natty said, probably to shock people and to make people think, look, you need to do something now before it’s too late.

 

But, yeah, to see this as not just a French thing, but as a White thing, I thought that was very important as well, because there’s still people out there who don’t understand that this is an anti-White thing, that this isn’t about being British, or French, or German, it’s about being White.

 

Natty: Yeah. And throughout the book there’s a couple of scenes where there’s a few Summits between the European nations. And it’s quite clear that I think Italy says:

 

“Oh, no, we can’t take them because we’ve got to think of the Catholic Church! And the fact that the Pope is here!”

 

And Britain says:

 

“Oh, well, we can’t take them, because we’ve got colonial ties with India. And all the rest of it.”

 

And they’re so happy when they don’t have to deal with this fleet. They’re totally, like, inward looking. If they can just have a few more months, or a few more years where they don’t have to deal with this.

 

And it’s exactly the same situation in the West. I mean, anyone with even half a brain cell can see where the current system of governance and culture is leading, and it’s nowhere good. I mean, it’s leading to what this book prophesies, basically.

 

We all understand this, and I’m pretty sure everyone listening understands this as well. Even if there’s people listening to this who hate us, or are working for the state, they know what’s coming. They know, whether it’s in 20 years, whether it’s in 50 years, if things carry on the way they are, it’s going to be bad for everyone. Not just not just us, because we’re raising our voices against it, but for you too, there’s going to be no progress, no improvement of the people you call your family and your ancestors. And all the rest of it.

 

The other interesting thing I found was, obviously France has a colonial past, and so does the UK. But this idea that this fleet is kind of retribution for the West completely ignores the fact that the same thing is happening in, like, Sweden and Denmark, which never expanded into Africa, or the Middle East, or anything like that.

 

Australia, or like you said, Mark, in the book, Jean Raspail, has this happening everywhere where there’s White people, right? So Australia, South Africa. And this book was written before apartheid ended. So while the Whites were still in charge in South Africa. And there’s quite an interesting part of the book which we haven’t touched on yet, that happens with South Africa.

 

But this happens everywhere and it has no bearing, and no worries about who did what in the past. It’s coming for all of you. I think you’ve kind of alluded to that with the idea of this being like a horror, a horror book, as well. TRS some horror aspects to this fleet and what it brings with it.

 

[1:10:01]

 

Aunt Sally: Yes, I’ve got notes on the bit about South Africa. And the fact that, well, he knew all this. He knew all this to write the book. But he didn’t know about South Africa. He didn’t see that coming, did he? It seemed out of place, the South Africa, but knowing what we know now, and now knowing what’s happened in South Africa, that he wrote this book, the one place that succumbed big time. In fact, they went first, didn’t they? That he didn’t foresee that it’s a strong White nation in the book still. And it turns them away as well.

 

I’m sorry. I’m not saying, … I just hated the book! [chuckling] I can’t say anything good about it! All I can think is, like, the audio of his voice, Alex Linder’s voice. Just these:

 

“Brown, putrid bodies!”

 

That’s all it’s saying. It’s horrible! Just words that he’s describing people, non-stop, being just filth! It’s affected me. It’s a horrible book! Sorry, you both liked it. I’m struggling to talk about it, because I’m almost traumatized by reading it. It’s awful. Yeah. Who suggested it? Was it you? Was it you Natty? I know.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

Aunt Sally: Please.

 

Natty: I wasn’t sure where else I could find it as an audio book. I only knew about the Alex Linder reading of it. I found that Alex Linder emphasizing the kind of horror, the kind of body horror of the Indian fleet added to the book. Maybe it’s a male thing, I’m not sure, [chuckling] but it made it all the more pressing. What’s happening in the book.

 

As to South Africa, it is interesting, because South Africa does the same thing as Egypt. Because obviously the fleet leaves India, and initially it looks like it’s head for the Suez Canal, but it turns south, because of this one action by the Egyptian government with their rusty old torpedo boat, rusty old destroyer. So it turns south and has the head around the Cape of Africa. So around South Africa. If you can imagine it on the map. And initially, because South Africa is a White country. And it’s still in the hands of the White South Africans there, they think, well, maybe the fleet is going to stop there. Because it’s a prosperous country, they could get welfare. And all the rest of it.

 

But the South African government does the same thing as the Egyptian government and makes it clear in no uncertain terms, they are going to open fire on this fleet if they try and land in South Africa. They’re completely uncaring. They’re totally used to dealing with a majority population. In the case of South Africa, of these blacks that they’re in charge of, they know exactly how to deal with them. They know that you threaten and then you use violence. And that’s how you get the job done. And that’s how they treat the fleet. And it works. The fleet just sails past.

 

As a result, there’s this howling and screeching from the media, in this case, the French media. Because that’s who it’s focused on. And the ambassador is shunned and all this other stuff, and South Africa is racist and all this, and all that. And they go on and on. But at the end of the day, they achieve their aims. And the fleet sail was passed, even going so far as to throw off the aid that the South Africans try and give them, to help them keep moving.

 

So, yeah, it’s interesting that South Africa had the military might and the will to do that, but then, like you said, a few years later, it falls and is now where it is, which is not a good place. He didn’t foresee that, I’ll give you that Sal!

 

Mark Collett: Just one other thing as well, about the Egyptian Navy obviously being able to turn back the whole flotilla just with one boat. Do you think it was his way of saying, and this could all be ended so easily and the West will just do nothing to end it? Because obviously the Egyptians did very easily manage to avert the crisis landing on their shores. And that is very true, isn’t it?

 

So you could even draw an analogy between that and what happened during Covid. So during Covid the Royal Navy managed to have boats constantly patrolling the English Channel with the intention of arresting sun bathers, or swimmers, or anybody going out and enjoying the summer during the 2020 Covid. But the same navy that can patrol every inch of those beaches to ensure that there’s no sunbathers there, now can’t do a single thing to stop migrants landing on those beaches in their hundreds, or thousands every day.

 

And I do think he makes an important point there as well. This migrant crisis that we’re living through now, even though he’s not here to see it, it could all be stopped with such great ease, couldn’t it? They could literally close that southern border with a stroke of a pen!

 

[1:15:53]

 

Natty: Oh, that’s one of the things that is totally clear with what you’re saying, is that it’s not that the government. I mean, in the book, Jean Raspail does take the teeth away from the government.

 

But in regards to where we are now it’s not that the government doesn’t have teeth and willingness to use force and use violence. But they don’t want to use it for the good of the country. They want to use it to repress their own people, arrest people for Twitter, things they write on Twitter.

 

You’re absolutely right! Any single person with just an ounce of moral fiber knows how to stop those migrant boats. And maybe there’d be involved, who knows? But it wouldn’t be hard, like you say, to even discuss this sounds stupid, because it’s so easy. It would be so ridiculously easy. And yet our own government is facilitating it!

 

This is what I mean. It’s not the problem that there’s 50,000 migrants in France who want to come across a Channel in small boats. The problem is that the government is helping them and wants to house them and pay the money when they get here! It’s totally the running theme is that in this book. And what now is that you’re going to get betrayed by the people in charge who hate you, and have this kind of pathological altruism that they’ve instilled into everyone. This kind of multiracial Diversity is Our Strength. You all know for slogans. This is a knife that’s jammed into your back using these slogans and using this kind of mass brainwashing.

 

Yeah, the government absolutely has a teeth to do certain things and take hard measures and take necessary steps if it feels as necessary, like arresting people for sunbathing! But stopping violent criminals, landing on your shore in little rubber dinghies:

 

“No, if we can’t do that! It’s too difficult, it costs too much money!”

 

Whatever. Pick your excuse!

 

Aunt Sally: It’s interesting that you said that, Mark, because I hadn’t thought of it.

 

But you’re right that the Egyptian fleet and the South African, how easy it was to turn them back. He’s showing thid. And what do we make of that? What Natty just said? They want it all engineered for a reason by people that don’t like us.

 

Mark Collett: Right. So we do have some Superchats. We don’t have many tonight. But we’ve got a few. So let’s do the ones we have, because we’ve only got about 35 minutes of this show left. So let’s do those. And then we can discuss a bit more of the book, or if anything else comes in, we can answer those as well.

 

So these are all from the same guy. He calls himself “A Stupid Moron”. I don’t know why he calls himself that, because he’s always very kind. So thank you for these Superchats. His first Superchat is he says:

 

“Hi, Mark. Pat Buchanan recently retired from writing. He was as close as a dissident Right figure to make the mainstream as we got. A good book to cover is The Death of the West. He was talking about demographics in the 1990s.”

 

Would you guys be interested in doing a Pat Buchanan book?

 

Natty: Yeah, absolutely. I keep hearing about him. I hear about him in circles and Telegram chats all the time. But, yeah, definitely. I’d certainly be up for that.

 

Aunt Sally: I would. I wouldn’t mind.

 

Mark Collett: It’s quite interesting. That people are brought up The Death of the West. And it’s interesting, because that was another book that I believe. If I’ve got this right, that was recommended reading when I was in the BNP. Yeah, it definitely was. It was originally published in 2001. Camp of the Saints was definitely recommended and Death of the West was as well. I remember Buchanan’s name being thrown around.

 

But I also think Pat Buchanan was somebody he was very, very he was a lot sort of more mainstream than, say, the people we usually have on this show. So it was interesting that he decided to basically write a book that sort of incendiary. He did go down sort of a line that the West was being destroyed by demographic change.

 

And he also was somebody who sought presidential nomination for the Republican Party. So it was quite interesting to see somebody who was that high up actually go down the route of talking about demographics in such an open way. Thank you for that Superchat.

 

The next one says:

 

“Recent Daily Mail article showed that 250,000,000, that’s 250,000,000, Latinos alone now want to migrate to the US. We are talking about Armageddon of Western civilization here.”

 

Yeah. Because obviously we get the dinghies. And the dinghies are resulting in some sort of quarter of a million illegal migrants washing up on Britain’s shores every year. But that land border between America and Mexico is obviously a huge, huge threat to America’s current demographic balance, which is already teetering on the brink.

 

What do you guys think about that? Do you think that America [word unclear] what is going to change when America does hit that demographic tipping point? Do you think that could be something that fundamentally, although will be disastrous for White Americans, do you think that could actually be something that could lead to America being supplanted by China, or even Russia as the global superpower?

 

[1:22:06]

 

Natty: That’s an interesting question. It’s quite hard to predict what would happen. There’s definitely all of the intangible qualities that European that allowed America to become strong will slowly be lost as the demographics. I know it’s not exactly happening slowly, but as it changes, things just become worse and shittier and infrastructure becomes worse. American culture, there’s a certain, like, hollowness to it as well. The way the roads are laid out, you don’t walk anywhere. It’s all just buy this and advertising. So it’s not hard to imagine that at some point in the near future, the hordes coming up from South America who are totally on board, by the way, … Again, another aside. Sorry to keep doing this.

 

Another aside is that the people like White Europeans, we’ve got a certain taste for our media. And you have to kind of cater to that you have to tell stories that are good. This is why so much of kind of dissident adjacent circles are constantly harping on about how crap the new Lord of Rings is, or how crap the new Star Wars is, or how soulless Marvel films are. All the rest of it.

 

However, it seems like a lot of the people who they are trying to replace Europeans with successfully don’t have any of those hangups. They’re more than happy to just consume this garbage storytelling, this garbage crappy films and media and music that they just pump out to keep people entertained. And I think that’s part of the reason why they’re so keen to bring them in. I mean, it serves a dual purpose. It’s quick money and it replaces White people, which it seems to be what every establishment is hell bent on doing! And does it mean they’re going to lose out to China and Russia? Well, Russia, who knows? But China, yeah.

 

I mean, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t. There’s no reason why a country full of deracinated Mexicans, or Hondurans, or Brazilians, or whoever it is, is going to outcompete China who has a strong, if nothing else you can say about them has a strong sense of who they are and kind of this work ethic that means they are competitive and they’re willing to export and sell and buy. And all the rest of it.

 

So, yeah, I don’t see why not.

 

[1:24:40]

 

Mark Collett: You’ve got to remember as well, that the Chinese are very interesting people, in that they are racially aware. And they are all very, very proud to be Chinese and want China to be the best! They want China to be the preeminent global superpower. Now, there are very few Britons alive today that want Britain to be a global superpower. And that’s a very interesting thing.

 

And you even see that in the gaming world. If you ever play a computer game, and you get beaten by somebody from China, you will just hear them screaming down the microphone:

 

“China number one! China number one!”

 

They want to dominate everything. [chuckling] They’ve got this sort of fierce racial pride in everything they do. And it’s comical! Because if I beat somebody, Call of Duty Wars, and if we win a game which very rarely happens, I can assure you, I don’t scream down the mic, :

 

“Britain’s number one!”

 

Even for somebody like me, that would seem absurd.

 

But they have national pride in everything they do, even winning an online multiplayer game, which tells you an awful lot about the Chinese as a people. And I think that’s very important. And I do think it does put you into this mindset that as America becomes more racially mixed and the more the Whites, completely deracinated, and there is an uptick in this sort of racial turmoil and diversity hires, which always seem to result in lower productivity and more chaos, you can see China just surpassing the US in every sense. And when that happens, well, there’s going to be a complete rebalancing of power. And I think you will know when that has happened. Because the first casualty will be Taiwan will be invaded.

 

Aunt Sally, do you have any comments on the Chinese?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I agree with what you said.

 

I mean, they really have a racial pride of themselves as a people. They don’t deserve to have it about their products, because everything I get is Chinese. I’ve got to the point now where I look to see where something’s made. And if it’s Chinese I’m not buying it, because it’s junk. It’s junk!

 

But one of the things that puzzles me is trade, like how trade works. And it’s going off topic. But it’s like, if I want to buy something from America, just a book, just a book from America, it costs $40 to get imported here.

 

But if you buy something from China, it’s free. So I don’t know what the trade deals are, but no wonder China is a superpower when our government have something in place where they get free postage everywhere.

 

As far as the politics go, China and Russia are superpowers. And I think India is going to be the next one. It’ll be the third superpower. And we are deracinated. We are a global minority now. And that really, really worries me, particularly when you think that of that minority, an awful lot of those are boomers. Sorry, Mark, I’m not up on politics. I don’t really, I’m not listening to the news anymore.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Thank you for that. The same Superchatter said:

 

“Hey, Mark and PA, Europe and the US have enjoyed multiculturalism and diversity. But now it’s Israel’s turn. Please help and support the message of open borders for Israel.”

 

Thank you very much. Also said:

 

“Even Colonel Gaddafi warned about Europe turning black in 2009. He noted, millions of sub-Saharan Africans want it to come in. If an African leader can recognize this, Western leaders are complicit.”

 

Now, this, I think, is really, really interesting. Really interesting, the Colonel Gaddafi stuff.

 

Now, Colonel Gaddafi was somebody who did prevent migrants flooding through his country. And he was a blockade, if you like, to mass migration into Europe. But he was obviously completely shut down and prevented from doing that. Obviously, his country was destabilized, and with a Western backed coup, he was killed.

 

But isn’t it really amazing, when you think about it, that he was saying, he said a long time ago that people were to get rid of him, if people were to do away with Gaddafi and his regime, that would lead to this absolute tidal wave of people flooding through Libya to get to Europe. And that’s what happened.

 

And Western leaders, for no real reason, destabilized Libya and replaced him as leader, even though they have no business. Libya is obviously a sovereign nation.

 

I mean, Natty and Aunt Sally, I don’t know how much you want to talk about this. But that’s an interesting point, isn’t it? It sort of plays into things that Jean Raspail was talking about, that the Western liberal elite are playing every card in their hand in order to bring this about, even to the point of destabilizing nations, which obviously always leads to further mass immigration.

 

[1:30:28]

 

Natty: So I actually had this in my notes about the book in that there are these kind of linchpin moments in history, the shooting of Franz Ferdinand that kicked off the First World War, the invasion of Poland, maybe as part of what happened in the Second World War. In the book, this incident at the Belgian embassy kicks off the invasion fleet heading to Europe.

 

But in reality, it was Gaddafi and the destruction of Libya and the destruction of Gaddafi’s government that led to this.

 

And if you put your conspiracy hat on, although I guess it’s not really conspiratorial to say that if Gaddafi understood this, when he was saying, :

 

“If you get rid of me, you are going to face this tidal wave of people flooding up from Africa in the Middle East and wherever else coming across the Mediterranean.”

 

If he understood that, then the people who were getting rid of him, namely the American regime, they obviously understood that too, which has to make you think, well, that’s exactly what they wanted, or part of what they wanted, whether it was a bonus on top of whatever else they were doing in the region. That’s what happened.

 

And as a result, not only did it lead to this gathering of people on the southern shores of the Mediterranean who wanted to cross to the northern shores, that’s just procedural, right? But it showed and exposed something that the book talks about as well, is that Europe had no backbone and no moral fiber to deal with it and stop it happening.

 

So, of course, everyone sees this, everyone recognizes it and so it just continues at pace and picks up pace. And even when it was happening back in, I think it was 2016, or 2015, people in this country were warning:

 

“This is going to be happening in the Channel soon enough. We’re a couple of years away from all of this being on our doorstep.”

 

And, of course nothing was done about it. Everyone just kind of turned over. Politicians ignore that kind of warning. And now, here we are. So history is a continuation. It’s not just stop, start, there’s cause and there’s effect, for everything.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. The thing about Gaddafi, I remember him and I had so much admiration for him when I was younger, just, :

 

“Oh, Gaddafi is doing this.”

 

And I’m talking through the 80s and 90s. He was almost a bit of a hero, if I’m honest. But the media did everything they could to demonize him. And they made out he was evil incarnate. But you could see through it. I could see through it. Like he ruled his country with an iron rod. I think they loved him, didn’t they? His people? They didn’t hate him. Although the press would make out that he was an evil despot, wouldn’t they?

 

But I was actually quite sad when they killed him. But at the time, I wasn’t aware of what’s going on now. I didn’t see the connection. But he was so right, what he said was going to happen, happened. And the rest really it’s all happening now, isn’t it? Just because of that one man’s death this is all happening. But, yeah, I liked him. I kind of had respect for Saddam Hussein as well. I’m not sure what was lies and what was truth, what we were told about.

 

Mark Collett: Everything was lies with him. I mean, he literally didn’t do anything. He didn’t have any of the Weapons Of Mass Destruction that they said he did. He just wanted a strong state for his people.

 

[1:34:15]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, and I saw at the time, he was another evil incarnate as far as our media was concerned. But I saw things about his people loving him and shrines to him and thinking:

 

“Well, how could they love him? How’s that happening?”

 

I mean, do you remember all these dead children that were gassed by Saddam Hussein that our media put out? So now, I can look back to things in the media, things in the press at the time, the propaganda they were giving us to hate somebody. And it was like all these children that he poisoned gassed.

 

I don’t know if you remember that photo, because it was quite an iconic photo at the time, these little Toddlers just laying face down dead because of him. And then what followed from that was, I don’t think they killed him then. But there was a drive to arrest him and catch him and kill him. But, yeah, I didn’t know what to make of him. But I didn’t quite believe what I was reading, even though I didn’t know what I know now.

 

Mark Collett: You know what’s always interesting as well, Sally. And I’m going to pose this question to you both. But I want you to answer it first. Obviously, gassings have a very special cultural power over us. But haven’t you noticed whenever a mad Middle Eastern despot has to be taken care of, it’s always because they’ve gassed somebody! It was the same with Al Assad in Syria. It was a gas attack! That was the reason why America had to start dropping bombs with Saddam Hussein. He gassed his enemies. And do you think this is something that is used, because it obviously has a mental connection for people to that certain history that people have been completely brainwashed over?

 

Aunt Sally: You know what I mean? He gassed his enemies. No, he killed children. Men, women and children. That was what we were shown. That was all the photos in the newspaper of these poor little Toddlers, these little Arab children all laying in the sand, frothing at the mouth. And I’ve seen something as well with the White Hats. They’ve done that quite a few times, the gassing thing.

 

But, yeah, this does seem to be a fixation with gassing going on somewhere, doesn’t it? That’s for sure. I forgot about Assad as well. He’s supposed to have done it. Why would you gas them? Why would you gas them? So there’s evidence. You just round them all up and throw them in hole, bury them! Why gas them and then let people take photos of it?

 

Natty: Careful Sally! [chuckling] It was a stupid, dubious incident in Syria that almost led us in there. Yeah, history repeats itself!

 

Mark Collett: It certainly does. We’ve got some final Superchats. One more from a good friend who sent several ones he put:

 

“Camp of the Saints was ahead of its time. Steve Sailor is the only person talking about the most important statistic in the world. 4.5 billion Africans by 2100! 50% of the youth want to go to Europe.”

 

Yeah, as we said throughout this stream, the one thing that Jean Raspail got wrong for me was where this was coming from. Now, I’m not saying Indians don’t want to come here. I’m not saying that having lots of Indians coming here would be a bad thing. Of course it would. But I don’t see this Indian problem.

 

The problem is Africa. And Africa is the one part of the world where the population growth is, you know, explosive! And they are going to be heading here. I remember back in my early days of YouTube, I did a video saying 100 million Africans, or 200, I can’t remember it’s either 100 million, or 200 million headed to Europe. And this came from a speech from, actually, a French official, which is quite poetic considering we’re talking about a French author and a book which is largely set based around the fate of France.

 

But, yeah, they are coming here in large numbers. Rory Herbert gave £3. Thank you so much, Rory. And he said:

 

“Dear Mark, would you consider reviewing the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golden in 1954, or the film of the same name?”

 

I think it might be an interesting topic. Because yeah, you know what? I’ve actually read The Lord of the Flies. It’s been a long time since I have. And I always found that book quite disturbing, especially the end. There’s a lot that can be taken from that. I would be actually interested in reading Lord of the Flies again.

 

And as I say, I remember reading that in school. And Cheesy Watson gave a generous £25. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Another book on a similar theme to Camp of the Saints is Fugue.”

How do you pronounce that? F-U-G-U-E. How do you pronounce hat Natty? I’m expecting you all know, because I don’t.

 

Natty: Sorry, Mark, I’m struggling to hear you. My audio is breaking up a little bit there.

 

Mark Collett: How do you pronounce the word? F-U-G-U-E?

 

Aunt Sally: Is it French?

 

Natty: Fugue? I think you could be in a fugue state. I think.

 

[1:40:03]

 

Mark Collett: Yes, that’s it. I didn’t want to read it out incorrectly:

 

“Fugue for a Darkening Island by Christopher Priest. It details civil war when African refugees flood Britain. Interesting. It was published around 1971, just before Camp of the Saints. Not sure if it’s any good, though.”

 

I would definitely be interested in reading that if it’s similar. And this is African refugees flooding Britain. And it was published in 1971.

 

By the way, Sally, you were correct. He wrote the book, or finished the book in 1972, when I said it was he wrote it in 1973. What I meant was it was originally published in 1973. But yeah. Thank you for that, Cheesy. What’s it. I’m going to see if that one is actually available.

 

And, yes, it is. You can get that on Ebay for as little as £3.49. And I’ll read you the premise of this. The novel story is told in an acronylogical fashion, jumping back and forth between several time periods. The protagonist, a former Professor of English named Alan Whitman, is initially concerned only with protecting his wife and daughter, but is gradually drawn further into the broader conflict over the course of events. And it says:

 

“It is brought about by the rise of a new third party who enter government and combat a massive influx in African refugees, which have been allied in part by the principal opposition faction known as the Secessionist, culminating into a multiple party conflict.”

 

So, yeah, that would be very, very interesting. And obviously it’s by an English writer.

 

So, yeah, would absolutely review this. Obviously, we probably [words unclear] next month. Because it would be like two books that are identical back to back. But, yeah, and the author is still alive. He’s 79. So maybe we could wrangle it and get him on the show? But that sounds very interesting. Have we lost Natty? We’ve lost Natty. He said he was having troubles.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, he’s gone.

 

Mark Collett: He’ll be fine. And we got another question. This is from Jack Bevan. He said, :

 

“Would you be interested in reviewing Liberalism Unmasked by Richard Houk? He’s a writer for Counter-Currents?”

 

Yeah, well, look, anyone from Counter-Currents is welcome to come on. Richard Houk, if you’re reading this, or if anyone can get him to email us, would happily review his book, he’d be more than welcome to come on the show. So the answer to that is, absolutely! We certainly would review your book, my friend. So, yes.

 

As I say, Natty is still gone. And we’re getting to the point of the night where we’re about to wrap up. So that is very unfortunate, because we certainly want his wise words on the roundup at the end.

 

So, yeah, we’ll discuss a few other things and hopefully he will be back in the next couple of minutes. He’s probably rebooting his computer as we speak. Computers are obviously a bit of a pain in the butt and can be very irritating.

 

But, yeah, I want to say just a couple of final things about this. I just think it’s quite poetic, really, that we’re reviewing this book tonight, especially considering the protests that I’ve been at over the last few weekends. I think that everything that Jean Raspail said, other than them coming from India was largely-oh he’s back!-was largely correct. And I do think it makes for a very entertaining book. Natty, can you hear us? Can you hear me?

 

Natty: Can you guys hear me?

 

Mark Collett: You’re back. We’ve got a $5 Superchat. Somebody saying:

 

“Would we ever review two of the books written by William Pierce?”

 

No, we absolutely wouldn’t! I don’t recommend anybody in Britain seek out the books of William Pierce. I’m not saying the guy was a bad man. He did some excellent work. But some of his books are likely to be the kind of book that could get you into some trouble. And we certainly wouldn’t recommend that you read, or seek out any texts that could get you into bother. And we certainly do not endorse any form of violent direct action, or anything that could lead to any individual who is interested in nationalism getting into trouble.

 

We believe that the only way is peaceful, Democratic community building. And that is what we’re investing in. As I said, I think Dr William Pierce did some very good work throughout his life. But some of his books could well be books that are on that secret government banned list, which is enforced in a very unfair way. What I mean, by that is you can go to Waterstones, or WH Smith and buy certain books. And if you’re an anarchist, or a Leftist, there’s nothing wrong with that.

 

But if you happen to be a nationalist and you pick up those books, you will be arrested. And people have gone to jail for owning them. So there is definitely selective enforcement of the law there. So if you’re basically an Antifa terrorist, you can own those books.

 

[1:45:45]

 

But if you are a nationalist who might be curious about what’s in those books, you could get arrested. So what I’m saying is. You need to be very, very careful what you do. And we want to channel all of our energies into things that are legal, above board and are based around building communities and changing the political landscape. So we absolutely don’t endorse those books.

 

Anyway, what we should do is now head towards wrapping up this show. I think it’s been a very good show tonight. And we started a few minutes late. I’m sure everyone wants to get off at around 09:00, because it’s Sunday night.

 

So Aunt Sally is now the first one on my panel. So, Aunt Sally, do you want to give your final thoughts on this book. And whether you recommend it? I think it’s going to be pretty scathing.

 

Aunt Sally: .. I think it’s very much a man’s book. It’s not my cup of tea. I really didn’t like it. Almost traumatized by it. It’s horrible! But there are some very interesting lessons to be learnt, or to be had from it. So it’s not a bad book, it’s just really just not my thing at all. Yeah, but everyone else seems to rave about it. You both liked it, I think. But I’m a woman and I’m playing the girl card. It’s not for me. It’s nothing in it that, … Politics bore the hell out of me anyway.

 

But the interesting parts are the way that the liberals acted. And I thought, then how did he know that’s how they would act all the way back then? It’s worth a read if it’s your cup of tea. It’s not mine. Sorry. Anyway, I’ll pop it back.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much Aunt Sally. I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy the book. And obviously we don’t try to foist books upon you that you don’t enjoy. But, yeah, not every book is going to be for every man, or every woman.

 

So, Natty, I think your take is going to be slightly different to Aunt Sally’s. Do you recommend this book? Did you enjoy it? What’s your final thoughts, my friend?

 

Natty: Yeah, definitely. Not only is it an enjoyable book. Again it’s one of those books that’s quite important for it’s time. I’ll tell you what, on a personal level as well, it’s written a little bit like Starship Troopers and the way Robert Heinlein wrote in that there’s kind of political ideas and political essays coming out of some of the mouths of the characters in what is a novel form, which I really enjoy…

 

I think it’s quite easy when you have a book, a non-fiction book, it can get a bit dry and stale. But if you have political ideas coming out of the mouths of characters who are also taking certain actions, whether it’s going to war, or defending borders, or whatever they’re doing, it makes it much more interesting.

 

So there’s a lot of that in this book.

 

So, yeah, definitely. Highly recommended! Highly recommended!

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’ll give you my final thoughts. I like this book, and I liked it for a few reasons. I liked it because it was very much a story told on a macro level that dived into a few different individuals and showed their story, but without really focusing. There wasn’t sort of one hero, or one central character. And I think that’s a very bold move! I think that’s a very difficult kind of book to write and to make it compelling. But it’s something I like.

 

I always really enjoy the beginning of zombie films where you start to see the crumbling of society and the zombie sort of taking over. And I tend to not enjoy the second half of those films where it just becomes the same well trodden heroes journey of five people fighting their way out of a shopping centre, or making their way to an airport to refit the last helicopter that can fly out of there and escape.

 

I like seeing how everything changes and society collapses. And I like actually watching that take place, or I’ve always wanted to watch that take place over the entire course of the film. But you never get this.

 

[1:50:02]

 

And I felt this book was really bold in the it showed you everything on a macro level. And it also wrote things from a certain perspective where you felt this impending doom. And as a reader, you’re constantly hoping that something was going to change. You were constantly thinking:

 

“Oh my gosh, can this be stopped?”

 

And it doesn’t! Which leads to quite a shocking ending, an ending that sort of gives you a slap around the face with a wet fish.

 

And that’s a good thing as well, because this author, he wrote things in a different way and he made you think about things. And there’s so much of it that’s prophetic. There’s so much of it which sort of draws on history, like the Haitian revolution.

 

And so much of it is relevant to the current struggle that we are engaged in. So much of that book can be applied to what’s happening today. And obviously so much so, that it has influenced people like Steve Bannon, who was really the mastermind behind Trump’s successful 2016 run.

 

So I definitely recommend picking this up. There’s a link in the description below to a copy on Archive.org, which is free. There is the full PDF that can be downloaded from my Telegram. And there’s also the audio book in several parts that can be downloaded from my Telegram. Obviously, they’re all free. So please do feel that you can go and get this book and enjoy it.

 

And obviously, if you want a physical copy in English, Claymore Books do have one coming out. But at the moment, physical copies in English are very rare and do fetch well over £100 per copy. I mean, I’ve seen them go for over 200. So that’s quite a lot for a book.

 

But it is obviously highly sought after, because it is one of those books you could say is a formative read. It’s something that helps people form their opinions and solidify their work, solidifies their worldview. And it does it all, probably with a little bit of Sci-Fi, with a little bit of that dystopian future. Which I do think Sally is very right when she says it’s certainly more of a male book than it is a female book.

 

So maybe if you are a female, you wouldn’t enjoy this as much. But considering it’s free and considering it’s available in audio format, I definitely do believe that this could be something that you may well enjoy. And as it’s free, I suggest giving it a whirl.

 

So, yeah, that’s my thoughts. And obviously everyone’s giving their thoughts. So that comes to the end of the stream. Obviously the stream has been slightly shorter tonight, because we’re having a couple of technical issues getting started. But I hope you’ve enjoyed it all the same. It’s only about five minutes shorter than usual anyway. So I think we’ve managed to wrap up just in time.

 

So I will be back next week. On Wednesday. We’ve got two guests on Patriotic Weekly Review. It’s going to be Laura Tower and Emily Yukis. It’s going to be a bit of a woman’s hour. So they will be doing what women do best, which is chat a lot. And you can obviously join them. And you can ask them your questions.

 

We should also be back next Friday night for a big stream. It’s going to be our monthly roundup stream and obviously if you’ve been living under a rock, you’ll have missed the fact that Patriotic Alternative have had probably one of their biggest ever months. It’s been a month to remember.

 

We’ve had several demos, which would be massive. I’ve spoken at two separate massive anti-immigrant demos, both of them with well over 100 people there. About 115 in Leeds, about 200 to 215 in Hull. So that’s been a busy month. So you can have the full round up there.

 

And Laura and Sam will be back tomorrow night with Teatime with Sam and Laura. So you can check that out too. And obviously we will be back at the end of next month for another edition of Book Club. And I’m talking to an author who’s contacted me through Twitter, who wants to send me and the guys here a copy of his book.

 

And next month we will be joined by another reviewer as well, a guy called Bill Aithling from Wales who is a PA activist. So we’re going to get the numbers back up to four reviewers. I hope you’ll all be looking forward to that. Anyway, everyone, if you can, please give you goodbyes and say good night and we’ll wrap things up.

 

Aunt Sally: Goodbye, everyone. Thanks for listening.

 

Natty: See you later, guys. See you next month. Look forward to whatever book comes down the pipe. Have a good evening.

 

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT