Mark Collett
British Justice – Wrong Speak Worse Than Child Abuse
TITLE 2
Fri, Apr 7, 2023
[Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British movement, Patriotic Alternative, on the prosecution/persecution of Allchurch says:
“The recent trial of nationalist podcaster James Allchurch AKA Sven Longshanks, who was recently found guilty of stirring up racial hatred, exposes the fact that courts in Britain are now punishing ‘speech crimes’ more harshly than they do crimes involving child sexual abuse – resulting in THOUSANDS of paedophiles walking FREE from British courts. Find out the truth of how the British justice system is being perverted and how you can help James Allchurch in the wake of his conviction for speech crimes.”
– KATANA]
https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20230407—BRITISH-JUSTICE—Wrong-Speak-WORSE-than-Child-Abuse:8
Published on Fri, Apr 7, 2023
Description
BRITISH JUSTICE – Wrong Speak WORSE than Child Abuse
April 7, 2023
2,047 views
266
3
Support
Save
3 Reposts
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
13K followers
Join
Follow
The recent trial of nationalist podcaster James Allchurch AKA Sven Longshanks, who was recently found guilty of stirring up racial hatred, exposes the fact that courts in Britain are now punishing ‘speech crimes’ more harshly than they do crimes involving child sexual abuse – resulting in THOUSANDS of paedophiles walking FREE from British courts. Find out the truth of how the British justice system is being perverted and how you can help James Allchurch in the wake of his conviction for speech crimes.
HELP JAMES ALLCHURCH:
https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/04/how-you-can-help.html
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrsJUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
FREE eBook download:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cctZ95PDYZTnRjSUd5VUtRR2c/view
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
free speech; hate speech; James allchurch; sven longshanks
204.31 MB
More
9.51K
40 comments
_____________
TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars
1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.
NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.
TRANSCRIPT
(16:43 mins)
[Intro imagery and music]
So as many people within nationalist circles will already know, James Allchurch, aka, Sven Longshanks, the owner of radioalbion.com, was last week found guilty on ten counts of stirring up racial hatred in relation to podcasts that he published over a two-year period on the aforementioned Radio Albion website – which at the time was called Radio Aryan. These podcasts were published back in 2016 and have now been removed from the site.
Now before we go on, I want to stress, James was charged with 15 counts of stirring up racial hatred, and in fact; he was found not guilty on five, and of the ten counts he was found guilty on, all were majority verdicts, meaning that the jury were not united in the decision to return a guilty verdict. In fact, one juror felt that James was not guilty of all counts and held out, refusing to go along with the other jurors. However, this was not enough, as in 1967 the British Government changed the law making it so juries no longer had to reach unanimous verdicts.
During the trial James was cross examined by a member of the King’s Counsel – the most senior level of legal representation in the country – and he held his own. As such I feel that James did himself proud, and the fact that he pleaded not guilty and fought the case to the end, winning over one juror and ensuring a third of the charges were dismissed, was, to say the least, impressive!
What makes this even more impressive was the fact that James’s legal team was changed at the last moment. Just days before his trial was due to commence, James was informed that the legal team he had been working with and preparing his case with for well over a year, were held up on another trial that was running over it’s allocated time. This meant that with just days to go an all-new legal team that were largely unfamiliar with the case were draughted in as James’s defence.
I find this unbelievable, and think it’s very unfair that the case wasn’t rescheduled to a later date so James could be represented by the team that he had been preparing with for well over a year.
I am not about to say that the legal team that represented him did a bad job, I am sure they did the best they could with the ridiculously short period of time they had to prepare, but I think it’s inconceivable that they could have done as good a job as a team that had been preparing for well over 12 months!
I am bemused as to why this case wasn’t pushed back and why the judge decided to hear the case – rejecting calls to move the trial date to a time when James’s original legal team that he had worked with for over a year were able to attend.
So, what do I think of the actual trial and the verdict?
Well firstly, let’s talk about the law itself. I don’t think these laws are just and I reject the idea that speech laws like this are necessary. Do I believe that any laws that place restrictions on speech should exist? Well yes actually, in two circumstances:
If someone is directly calling for violence or explicitly demanding that someone harms another person, the person issuing those calls should be prosecuted.
Also, if someone spreads known falsehoods about another person in order to damage that person’s reputation, that case should also be dealt with through legal channels, either through the criminal courts or through private civil cases.
However, there were already laws in the UK dealing with both genuine cases of incitement and the spreading of malicious falsehoods that predate any of the draconian and anti-free speech “race” laws passed by successive post-war governments.
The laws that James was charged under – in short, the race hate laws – are a perfect example of a scandalous and tyrannical attempt by successive governments in order to restrict freedom of speech on certain topics that pertain to race and ethnicity. These laws are designed to both prevent discussion and to instil fear in normal people who wish to raise perfectly legitimate political or social points.
What’s more, when these cases are brought to court; they aren’t really based on evidence as such. These trials end up being based on the opinion of the jury as to what the intent of the defendant was and fundamentally what affect the words that the defendant used would have on other people. This is a very murky way to conduct a trial. And in legal terms it is more in line with a Soviet-esque show trial than anything that could really be called “justice”.
Such trials aren’t like a murder trials where real evidence: DNA, fingerprints, CCTV footage or other physical and visual evidence will be presented and reviewed in a cold, hard and factual manner. Was the defendant seen or pictured at the scene of the crime? Was the DNA of the victim found on the defendant’s clothing? Were the defendant’s fingerprints found on the handle of the knife recovered from the crime scene? All of this is directly quantifiable.
However, in “race hate” trials, most of the proceedings are based on opinion – which is always governed to some degree by emotion. What do you think the defendant was thinking when he made that speech? How do you feel someone else would feel if they heard the defendant’s speech? How would someone be influenced by the defendant’s speech? Would the defendant’s speech by likely to make someone else feel a certain way?
Then throw in the fact that these juries don’t truly understand the law in question and that all of the jurors will have their own political, social and religious beliefs, and you have a trial which is based on anything but fact.
This heavy slant toward emotion and opinion turns such “race hate” trials into a mixture of a witch hunt and a reality TV show, where the defendant isn’t actually tried on the basis of a number of pieces of quantifiable evidence, but instead, proceedings are based more around whether the defendant is a “bad” person and whether the words said by the defendant could effectively cause other’s to be “bad people”.
It’s all very Orwellian and was designed to be so.
And remember: I’ve been part of one of these trials. I was once charged with 8 counts of stirring up racial hatred, so I know first-hand that much of any such a trial is spent not presenting evidence, but instead the prosecutor attempts to poison a jury into believing that holding certain views is reason enough to condemn the defendant to a prison sentence.
And as we live in a politically correct, liberal and progressive world, one where Judges are appointed due to “political merit”, those found guilty during such reality TV witch trials are likely to be served much harsher sentences than those convicted of real crimes – such as rape, child abuse and paedophilia.
And that’s not a joke, that’s not an overreaction, that’s not hyperbole.
The judge presiding over James Allchurch’s case, one Huw Rees, reportedly said the following after the guilty verdicts were read. And I quote:
“What I have heard over the last fortnight I regard as a stain on humanity.”
End quote. The Judge then reportedly went on to state, and again I quote:
“My intention is to send your client to prison immediately. And that sentence will be measured in years, not in months.
I make it very clear to you that you should prepare yourself for a sentence of immediate imprisonment.”
End quote. Yes, a stain on humanity and a prison sentence measured in years not months, pending a pre-sentence report that is.
However, let’s have a quick look at this judge’s previous record and see how he has dealt with other cases, what sentences he passed down for other crimes and where he decided to show mercy. Mercy for crimes, that I feel are far more severe and far more stomach churning than simply espousing opinions that the state deems “offensive”.
The first case is from 2022 and relates to a Muslim cleric who sexually abused a young girl in his care, I read this from Wales Online, and I quote:
“A trusted imam who raped a young schoolgirl in a mosque has been given an absolute discharge due to his dementia. Khandaker Mohammed Rahman pushed the child into a washroom and attacked her, and then went on to sexually assault her on further occasions when she attended the religious and cultural centre by touching her breasts and bum.”
End quote. The second case is from 2015, and relates to a convicted paedophile who worked at a primary school in Wales and was found to have over 600 images of child porn on his computer, I read from the Independent. And I quote:
“A 55-year-old primary school caretaker walked free from Cardiff Crown court, claiming possessing over 600 child abuse images was ‘just a morbid curiosity’.
Michael Pendry, a Cardiff primary school caretaker who lived on the grounds, was caught by police in possession of 658 child abuse images, which he admitted he had looked at and shared with other paedophiles online ‘for years’.
Yesterday, Judge Huw Rees decided not to award Pendry a custodial term but said instead he would take a ‘risk’ in sentencing him to three years community service.”
End quote. So, whilst James’s words were apparently a “stain on humanity” and should only be punished by a custodial sentence measured in years not months, the same judge allowed an elderly Muslim child rapist to walk free due to medical reasons and allowed a paedophile school caretaker to also walk free, because, well, I don’t know! I actually haven’t a clue why anyone would let a monster like that, who possesses images of children being sexually abused, walk free. And bear in mind, that 25 of the images possessed by the paedophile Michael Pendry fell into the worst category of abuse. But he still walked free from court.
And if you think this is an isolated case, it’s not. This isn’t just one judge making bad calls, this is mirrored across the entire legal system.
And I’ve made videos on this before, so I will be brief, but here’s a few examples:
Darren Phelps from Swindon walked free from court last year after being found with over 12,000 indecent images of children on his computer, I read from the Swindon Advertiser, and I quote:
“Darren Phelps stored images of children as young as one or two years old for his own sexual pleasure, and even posed as a child in a chat room and uploaded some of his cache.
He was chastised by the judge who told him ‘it is people like you that create the industry’ for child abuse – although he was allowed to walk out of the courtroom minutes later after being given a community order.”
End quote. In 2021 a married engineer from Liverpool walked free from court after being found guilty of possessing over 2,000 images of child porn, I read this from the Liverpool echo, and I quote:
“A shamed civil engineer walked free from court with his ‘supportive’ wife after he downloaded child rape photos.
Over the span of 12 years, 33-year-old James Shaw secretly amassed more than 2,000 indecent images of children.
The paedophile’s sick collection included files showing victims of child sexual abuse as young as four.”
End quote. And in 2020, a former Labour Councillor, Roger Spackman, walked free from court after being found with over one million child abuse images on his 68 electronic devices. I read this from the Daily Mail, and I quote:
“A paedophile Labour councillor who worked in a children’s home has walked free despite being caught with over one million child porn images – including of 12-year-old girls being raped.
Roger Spackman, 50, who was a Labour councillor on Exeter City Council until his arrest in 2017, worked at a secure children’s home at the time he started collecting the enormous hoard of images.
Exeter Crown Court heard that he was part of an underground internet network called ‘The Other Place’.”
End quote. So, I think it’s clear that cases of paedophiles walking free aren’t rare – in fact it’s now becoming the “new normal”. What’s more, these cases involving paedophiles are cases based on actual evidence, unlike cases involving so-called “hate” speech. A defendant either owns such images or they don’t, and if they do, they should be going to jail, or in an ideal world, be fed to badgers!
But this isn’t an ideal world. It’s a sickening and perverse world where words and opinions can land you a longer prison sentence than abusing children. Which is all very telling. When you distil this down to its base level, the highly politicised judicial system finds holding the wrong opinions a greater crime than child abuse.
But oh, I hear the liberals cry:
“How many people were offended by the words of James Allchurch? How many members of ethnic minority communities heard his podcasts and were deeply hurt? What psychological damage did James cause people of colour?”
Well, the shocking answer to this, is in fact, zero!
During James’s trial it emerged that not a single person of colour or minority complained to the police about anything James had said. The complaint was brought to the police by his Member of Parliament after he was pressured to do so by Hope Not Hate.
So, if you were still on the fence to whether this was a political prosecution, then I think that little piece of evidence seals the deal. But weighing all the evidence, I probably wouldn’t call this a “political prosecution”, as it’s not a prosecution, it’s “political persecution”.
James Allchurch, A 51-year-old disabled man who was dragged before a court with a legal team that had only had days to prepare for the trial is now facing years in prison for saying something that said court deemed offensive to minorities when not a single member of a minority community complained. And all this is all taking place when that very same court has let paedophiles walk free!
This isn’t justice! This is an inversion of justice!
Now I know many people listening would like to help. And James, aka, Sven Longshanks does need help. You can always make a financial contribution to his cause, or you can assist him with his pre-sentencing report by providing a witness statement as to his good character. There is now a page on radioalbion.com which details the ways in which you can help him, it’s linked in the description below.
Thank you for your support. And we wish James all the best for his sentencing later this month.
[16:43]
END
============================================
Odysee Comments
Mr
4 days ago
Too much, too much fu*king perspective now.
Log in to reply
2
0
Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
The same Lib-Lab-Con Regime that 50% of our tribe insist on voting in every election contrary to all the evidence it is their enemy. The definition of madness: doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different outcomes.
We are easily not saving half of our tribe who are wedded to the System. At this point I say, fk em. Examples need to be set and they need to suffer their actions if they are to learn. They are dragging us all down into their private hell.
White or not -fk em. I’m sick of excusing them. Sven is doing time because the electorate have given their permission to the enemy. It’s really that simple.
Log in to reply
2
0
@PureNomad
4 days ago
Guilty of having an opinion that counters the (((globalists))) narrative.
Log in to reply
42
0
Hide replies
Asadafa
4 days ago
“guilty” of being correct.
Log in to reply
22
0
@Rumrage
3 days ago
guilty of infringing noahide laws
Log in to reply
1
0
@BritishGammon
4 days ago
People used to say “trust in British justice, it’s the best in the world.”
I don’t hear people saying that anymore!
Log in to reply
32
0
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
The whole System needs to be SMASHED. Anyone with loyalty to it at this stage is a partisan and collaborator -White or not.
Log in to reply
1
0
@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago
Off-topic: “RAF boss ready to test limit of the law to improve diversity”
https://news.sky.com/story/raf-boss-says-he-is-ready-to-test-the-limit-of-the-law-to-improve-diversity-in-the-force-leaked-transcript-reveals-12851128
RAF boss ready to test ‘the limit of the law’ to improve diversity
byu/wobblebits inunitedkingdom
What we need is a ‘White Strike’: we should stop contributing to the anti-White (anti-Indigenous British) system. Stop paying taxes. Stop supporting anti-White companies. A day will come when non-Whites in our armed forces will turn against the UNARMED and DEFENCELESS Indigenous British.
Log in to reply
27
0
Hide replies
@vettekid407
4 days ago
I’ve stopped paying taxes a decade ago …so far so good…very risky though. I’ve been selling on eBay during that period but they are required to report my sales to the Federal Government
Log in to reply
13
0
@Esau
4 days ago
Yes, and a worldwide “White strike” would be even better, but it would have to be coordinated, and have lots of committed strikers.
Log in to reply
10
0
Show reply
Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
By far the best comment on this thread.
Log in to reply
Chaz
4 days ago
“This isn’t justice. This is an inversion of justice”
It’s Anarcho-tyranny and it’s psychological warfare designed to condition the masses into accepting heinous acts as the norm.
Log in to reply
22
0
Strawberry_Lynn
4 days ago
00:30
“James was charged with 15 counts of stirring up racial hatred”
NOTHING stirs up “racial hatred” like mass immigration. It’s the ultimate way of doing it. All responsible should be in jail
Log in to reply
16
0
Hide replies
@ゼロHope
4 days ago
When they accuse people of incitement of hatred or violence, it’s an admission of guilt because they believe what they are doing justifies that response if people notice it, thus talking about it logically follows as incitement.
Log in to reply
2
0
Awake since 1997
4 days ago
We must all take DAILY action online AND offline to push back HARD.
Log in to reply
16
0
JimB
4 days ago
The judge in Sven’s case is absolutely disgusting and deserves a jail cell himself. Sadly this is all too common across the entire Western world, and it’s so damn frustrating that these s***libs have managed to metastasize throughout every level of our respective societies like cancers. Unless reversed, we ARE doomed. This corrupt, antiwhite and utterly insane system must be dismantled. With extreme prejudice.
Log in to reply
15
0
Strawberry_Lynn
4 days ago
HATE SPEECH: Statements that the government doesn’t like
Log in to reply
11
0
Asadafa
4 days ago
The speech laws in Europe are a relic of past tyrannies, even if they were reimplemented after humanity’s loss in WWII.
Log in to reply
11
0
@BS2022
4 days ago
Sexual abuse is not an offence with these Freemasons, they condone it. It’s out in the open now.
Log in to reply
10
0
@Grumpole
4 days ago
Truths are now hate speech, everything is inverted, what we deem as evil and perverted these psychopaths see as normal, honesty and truths are abhorrent to the criminal perverted establishment.
Log in to reply
9
0
Lill Frigg main channel
4 days ago
Is this blocked for anyone else?? Since the site got updated half the videos I want to watch are blocked 🥴😳
Log in to reply
7
0
Hide replies
@ShoggyShaggy
4 days ago
Might be because of where you are watching them from. Since I’m in the US I don’t have any restrictions.
Log in to reply
5
0
Hide replies
Lill Frigg main channel
4 days ago
Yeah probably the EU trying to go full north Korea on us. 😬
Log in to reply
2
0
@noreplacement
4 days ago
Sadly predictable. Absolutely disgusting.
Log in to reply
6
0
@ゼロHope
4 days ago
The judges sympathizes with rapists and pedophiles, yet calls the person who has a problem with rape and pedophilia a stain on humanity… thinking hmm… so the judge might very well be possibly be interested in similar hobbies.
Log in to reply
4
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
19 minutes ago
nah the judge is some out of touch buffoon or likely being paid by higher authority to conduct such sentences.
Log in to reply
Randy McDowell
4 days ago
Absolutely appalling. That poor Man.
Log in to reply
5
0
MichaelB
3 days ago
This demonstrates that the British and all Europeans lost the Second World War with Germany.
Log in to reply
4
0
Hide replies
Reparations. Get Your Reparations!
2 days ago
If only we could show the people of the past what their sacrifices would bring about in the future… WW2 would not even have happened.
Log in to reply
1
0
CynanMacNial
4 days ago
Absolutely fantastic work Mark. I was utterly mortified when i saw the headline that Sven had been found guilty. Most of our people would glance at it and think; fair enough hes obviously a Nazi. Oblivious to the fact its one of our own being thrown to the wolves and our freedom, rights and nationhood are being further eroded. James is a hero of our folk and should be given Laurels. Many thanks and God bless!
Log in to reply
4
0
@cheflad
4 days ago
the Judiciary is totally infiltrated.
Log in to reply
3
0
@Deanfranjek
1 day ago
Time to rise up. Globalists must die
Log in to reply
2
0
@John_Connor
22 hours ago
Anyone got a link to the “banned” podcasts
Log in to reply
1
0
@MilosM.
21 minutes ago
strange trial, that is. the system is officially against native people and it’s shame and disgrace. Justice is put to sleep. I am afraid this won’t end well. I won’t advocate for harsher means, but I am afraid they will be necessary once.
Oh and I won’t defend pedo collectors of ghast material, but imo those who make such images of children in hurt are way worse than people who keep them on their phone.
Log in to reply
@MalteHenryk
1 day ago
A completely biased court that doesn’t even give the legal team of the accused enough time for proper preparations.
Nuremberg comes to mind.
Log in to reply
Awake since 1997
3 days ago
Ultra toxic brainwashed victim talking about the brainwashed lol….
https://t.me/endilluminati/22921
Log in to reply
@James_Smith
4 days ago
Thanks for the explanation Mark – A disgusting situation.
Log in to reply
MTaylor
4 days ago
==========================
See Also
Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT
============================================
PDF Download
- Total words in post = 4,312
- Total words in transcript = 2,505
- Total images = xx
- Total A4 pages = xxx
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)
Version History
Version 5:
Version 4:
Version 3:
Version 2:
Version 1: Wed, Apr 12, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (40).