[Millennial Woes continues his tradition of a yearly Millenniyule series of interviews that started in Dec, 2016.
Here, in his 2nd Millenniyule interview for 2021, Woes chats (101 mins) with PhilosophiCat. She’s an American nationalist, with a keen interest in Julius Evola. They discuss religion and spiritualism; the need to focus on the Covid issue vs demographics; and much more. Odysee comments included (355).
— KATANA.]
_______________________
Millenniyule 2021 – 02
PhilosophiCat
Dec 13, 2021
Click the link below to view the video:
https://odysee.com/@millennialwoes:4/MY2021Philosophicat:c
Also on BitChute:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gBJC7Uovixt9/
Odysee Description
Published on Dec 13, 2021
Millenniyule 2021: Philosophicat
December 13th, 2021
12,542 views
Channel profile picture
Millennial Woes
@millennialwoes
4,447 Followers
Follow
LBRY URL
lbry://@millennialwoes#4/MY2021Philosophicat#c
Claim ID
ccbe7b58778aa075d8660785c2c20e8d6f0c4d07
562.76 MB
More
1
7 comments
__________________________
TRANSCRIPT
(101:50)
NOTE: Readers can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section, i.e., copy a section of text that needs improving and paste it into the comments section and make the corrections. I will then replace the original text here with the corrected version. Thanks.
[00:01]
Woes: Hello. And welcome back to millenniyule 2021. And I’m now here with the lovely PhilosophiCat. Hello. And welcome to Millennial. I think this is the third time you’ve been on?
PhilosophiCat: Yes it is. Three years running. So thank you so much for including me again in this wonderful holiday tradition of yours. And I’m very excited to be on the first day of the season.
Woes: Thank you very much.
PhilosophiCat: It’s nice I’m chatting with you!
Woes: I thought it would be, it’s usually quite a nice sort of laid-back relaxed chat with you. So I thought it would be nice to start with. Because I know that I’m not even in a good, … I was so nervous about Millenniyule, that I actually, I think I only got three hours sleep last night.
PhilosophiCat: Oh no!
Woes: Yeah, it’s quite a nerve-wracking thing, because I hadn’t live streamed in a year. So it’s strange. And, of course, it’s now a new platform. It’s Odysee. So it’s all a bit different. Oh! And that reminds me. I just did a stream with the Golden One, and I forgot to answer the Superchats, or forgot to put them to the Golden One. So I apologize for that.
Someone actually thought that the streams were pre-recorded. Not at all! This is completely live. So anyway, here we are with PhilosophiCat. And I don’t think, … Well do you want to introduce yourself briefly, just in case anyone disgustingly doesn’t know about you already!
PhilosophiCat: How dare they not know about me! [chuckling] I’m kidding! Yeah there probably are some people who aren’t familiar with me, even though I’ve been on for a few years. I’m sure you’ve picked up a few new subscribers since then, especially with your move to Odysee.
So yes, I’m philosophicat. I have a YouTube channel and an Odysee channel that mirrors from YouTube. I mainly do a series on Julius Evola’s, Revolt Against the Modern World. But sometimes I put up other stuff as well. I’ve got, you know, Twitter, and Telegram.
And kind of been branching out into a little bit more astrology lately with my AstrologiCat channel on Telegram, as well. I may eventually get around to doing some videos on that subject.
But at the moment Julius Evola’s has kind of been my thing. And that’s been my main focus now for the last, going on two years, I want to say.
Woes: Yeah. That seems about right. And I mean, you and I have chatted quite a lot over the last two years with the lockdown, the Great Reset, Covid. And it’s a massive interest to me. And I know it’s of interest here as well. And great concern. Because we have watched from different parts of the world, we’ve watched everything unfold and it has been quite an experience, quite nerve-wracking. Quite disturbing! [chuckling]
PhilosophiCat: Very!
Woes: So would you like to talk about that. I know we must have talked about it last year. But do you have any additional thoughts this year?
PhilosophiCat: You know, I recall that we did talk about it last year. But my concern last year had been that everybody else’s focus was going to be on like:
“Oh my god! It’s so horrible! What happened!”
And analyzing the creeping authoritarianism, and dystopia. You and I took a bit of a different tack I think he talked more about how to cope with it in a healthy way. And hopefully that helps some people last year. And hopefully it continues to help them, this year. Because there seems to be no end in sight! What can you do? Just roll with it. But yeah.
Woes: Well, as I was just saying with the Golden One, it sort of up ended a lot of assumptions that people had about society. Being a citizen in the 21st century. It’s interesting because, and this is stuff that I’ve been analyzing throughout this year in my own weekly show.
We were, you know, we grew up in a similar time that in the 90s, the 2000s, and the 2010s. And it’s all throughout that there was this sense of individualism, liberty, libertine, and then licence. And all that. And just being a consumer.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah.
Woes: And that seems to have changed. And I would never have predicted that! And yeah it’s now giving way to a sort of artificial collectivism. And the idea of liberty, the idea of being an individual, it seems to be falling away now. Which I find fascinating. I don’t know would you have anything to say about that?
PhilosophiCat: Yeah, I think the individualism is kind of falling away from people. In one of two ways. Either it’s causing them to sort of wake up to the globalist lies and become more nationalistic, and understand the value of that. And that’s more of a healthy type of collectivism.
But I think the majority of people are kind of going to the opposite extreme, and falling into the collectivism of just being an NPC. And letting the government and the media do their thinking for them so that they don’t have to be a real person.
And that’s very different than when you look to individualism within a context of nationalism, where there is still room to be an individual person and, you know, pursue your own unique potential within a collective that is supportive of that. Whereas with these NPCs, they’re all just like:
“No. Conform! Be an interchangeable cog! There’s no room for you to be a real person!”
[05:41]
Woes: Yeah! And the memes have been hilarious! I mean, the NPCs, … Morgoth posted a thing on Telegram a few days ago, a few weeks ago, about how the NPC meme had inadvertently revealed something about the human condition that we didn’t really recognize before. And so that’s why it hasn’t died. That’s why the meme has persisted and evolved. And been used in all sorts of new contexts. Because it’s frighteningly true.
I think there’s a limit to how useful it is to castigate people for being NPCs, whatever you want. I hate the term “sheeple”, but, you know whatever. Because I think it might just be the way most people are, and the way most people have to be. Because it’s possible that you cannot have a cohesive functioning society if everyone is like you and me! [Laughter]
PhilosophiCat: Yea! Might be a little too [chuckling] individualistic then!
Woes: Yeah, ironically! And that is the idea, …
PhilosophiCat: You’re too artistic [Laughter]!
Woes: Possibly! Very possibly! But really, is that people like you and me are advocating a certain type of collectivism. But in order to do that, we have had to be very rebellious, very individualistic. So it’s a weird irony about all of this.
But anyway to get into what you want to talk about. Which is spirituality, and well, okay, let’s get into that. I think a lot of people nowadays don’t really know what even that term refers to. I mean, a cliche about our time, our age, is:
“Well I’m not religious. But I am spiritual.”
And it’s a sort of mocking cliche. It’s an excuse for someone who can’t be bothered joining a religion. But they want the sort of gravitas of it. But obviously there is much more to spiritualism. And awareness of spiritual health greatly precedes the age of atheism. So, you take it away.
PhilosophiCat: Well, look. There’s a big difference, and a big gap, between spirituality and religion. And there can be some overlap but often there’s not. I would maybe consider myself one of those, you know, spiritual, but not religious, people. Not in the sense of how it’s normally taken one of these kind of new age, woo-woo, hippie types, who’s just all about the feels. And just their idea of spirituality is like the emotionality they get from larping!
Woes: Yes.
PhilosophiCat: And it’s a very, what they’re seeking, is a very downward transcendence, that isn’t, … I mean, I don’t want to put anybody down if there are people listening who are involved in that and it’s meaningful to them. But it’s not directing you towards anything higher. It’s really just kind of going down into the subterranean, … Yeah, that’s a kind of transcendence. It takes you out of the profane world in a way. But you’re almost going in the wrong direction.
Now, for some people you can kind of, like a roller coaster, you go down. And then you get the momentum to go up. But that often doesn’t happen.
So from my perspective when I’m talking about, well, I’m spiritual but not religious, my view is that there isn’t a religion in the modern world that really has all the answers. They’re all corrupted to some extent. They’re not really offering what it is that I’m looking for.
But I can see that there’s truth and wisdom to be found in all of them, to greater, or lesser degrees. And I can appreciate it for what it is. But ultimately I feel like my journey is to just seek my own path for now.
Maybe I change my mind later in the future. I don’t know. I haven’t explored every religion in depth. I could be wrong.
Woes: Yeah. I mean, I didn’t want to, I didn’t mean to put you on the defensive, or, ….
[10:01]
PhilosophiCat: No! No! I was just, …
Woes: No. I just want to make be clear. I wasn’t mocking you, or anything. It’s just there’s a cliche of the sort of shallow modern person who says they’re not religious. But they are spiritual.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah.
Woes: But the reason it’s a shame that’s a cliche is that there are people who genuinely have looked into this stuff and would honestly say that about themselves. And I think you’re one of those people.
So, … I’ll ask you, what is the “spirit”? I mean, let’s actually start at that level. Because, I mean, obviously people now are very scientific, scientistic! We talk about molecules and, you know, organs, biology, what is the spirit?
PhilosophiCat: Look, … You’re then broaching this big topic, that is, … The spiritual realm is outside the realm of the material world. It’s not physical. It’s metaphysical. And so the more that you try to pin it down with some kind of accurate language, the further away you get from the truth of it, because it’s meant to be experienced, and not described.
And this is one of the problems that I have with a lot of modern religions is there’s this attempt to approach the spiritual from a very rational and empirical perspective, or a very dogmatic and ideological perspective. Where there’s kind of like saying:
“Well, this is what you should believe, because someone else said so.”
And they’re not really providing a pathway through which you can experience that yourself. And it’s that experiential knowledge that is going to further you on that path.
Woes: Right. So, … But I take all of that on board. And it’s all worthwhile. But to return to the question of what is the “spirit”?
PhilosophiCat: It depends, I guess, on how you’re asking about it. Can you clarify your terminology first? And then I can go from there. Because I don’t want to assume what you’re trying to convey.
Woes: I’m not trying to convey. I’m trying to clarify. If we talk about spirituality, spiritualism, spiritual health, then we have to know what is the spirit that we’re talking about.
PhilosophiCat: Okay. I see, right. So obviously spirituality deals with things of a divine, or transcendent nature. And in order to have contact with that you need to have developed, you know, something of a “spirit” within you. Some people would call this the “soul”. We don’t need to get into the semantics over the difference of that right now. It would be a really spergy topic [chuckling] to be honest! Let’s try to keep the autism away here today [loud laughing]! Because I know you’ve got guests coming on who are probably far more spergy than me! So I’ll try to spare your audience.
Woes: You’re not [chuckling] going to take them on! You’re not going to try to have a sperg on! [Laughter]
PhilosophiCat: I know I won’t win! And I don’t want to play the game if I can’t win! I don’t know if that’s a prize I want to win.
But let’s just for the sake of argument. And just to keep things simple, talk about the spirit in terms of what most people would say is the soul. And there is, … You’re not just, in my opinion, you’re not just born with this eternal consciousness, right? Now you’re born with part of you this animating force that is eternal.
But in terms of having a real spirit that can ascend and become something more and break out of the bonds of materiality, in this kind of samsaric cycle of illusion, that we’re all stuck in. You know, that’s something you have to cultivate. And that means developing an inner life. It means developing the capacity for that experiential knowledge that we just talked about.
I think this is something that is really important, especially in the modern age right now. This is kind of the one topic that everybody’s sort of leaving out when they talk about solutions to problems.
And the reason I say that, and you’re feel free to disagree. But if you give up your faith, you give up your foothold. And in the darkest of times, which quite possibly are coming, given the way things are going, there’s not going to be some logical argument that can be presented to you to keep your spirituality through those times.
So it is really important to cultivate it now, so it’s strong enough to see you through. And I think some people would say that like:
“Oh well, if things are going to get that bad, then isn’t it kind of just giving up to focus on spirituality?”
And I would say, no. Because part of the reason that this is so important, is, because spiritual people, historically, they fight the hardest! They’re the most daring adversaries! Whereas nihilist and atheists generally don’t fight hard for anything, because they don’t believe in anything!
[15:28]
Woes: Of course! I mean, I can’t imagine, … This is the whole thing about, would anyone fight in a war nowadays for Britain, or for America? I mean, I don’t think they have loyalty to their countries anymore, then they have love of their country, most people. But also they don’t have religion. So what they have is the question of:
“Well, I could stay here and be comfortable and be a consumer, or I could go off and risk everything and possibly get killed. Why would I do that?”
PhilosophiCat: Exactly!
Woes: So there’s no rationale for it then.
PhilosophiCat: Exactly! So when you think about what might be coming, you are going to have two options. You can either just give in to the despair and say:
“This is just a desperate, doomed situation. And there’s nothing I can do. So I may as well just watch porn and become a coomer until the apocalypse happens!”
Or you can pour yourself into a spiritual life cultivate that inner strength within you. You know, meditation, or whatever, for example, that’s a tool that strengthens the mind the way that exercise strengthens the body. And it makes your mind into a tool and a weapon, in the same way exercising your muscles makes your body into a tool and a weapon.
So if we’ve got a big fight coming, you’re going to need both of those things. You’re going to need a strong body, and a strong mind to get through it.
I think a lot of people, especially in the West, where atheism and nihilism is just so prevalent. A lot of these people are going to be psychologically broken as this whole crisis wears on. Many people were psychologically broken within the first few months of it! And here we are two years on with no end in sight!
Woes: And that’s what I’ll be talking about with the next guest, Mark Malone. He’s very much into that aspect of it. He thinks that, I think it’s within two, it’s either two, or three months, people are in a state of brainwashing. So that surprised me. But that’s what he’s going to be talking about. Like how it took hold, how it was done. But anyway!
So, well, within that that context, what I would say about this, is that why people don’t address this, is in this age it’s easy to assume that any talk of the spirit, spirituality, it’s just woo-woo! I mean, you’ll remember the heyday of the new atheists. Richard Dawkins.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah.
Woes: And they’re still, these guys are still saying that kind of vacuous drivel now, 10, 15 years later!
PhilosophiCat: I’ve seen some of Dawkin’s tweets. And they’re [chuckling] just, they’re so bad!
Woes: It’s just they’re so awful! They’re so shallow. I mean, it’s like an edgy 15 year old. But I think he’s about 70, or 80 now.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah! I look at them. And I think. Like, if I was like 18, 19 whatever, I would have thought that saying something like that was really cool! And now I’m like:
“Yeah, no you probably should have grown out of that by now.”
Woes: Yeah, exactly! I think they’re part of the modern nihilism, and well atheism, is a certain person, type of person, has emerged who delights in their being no god! No afterlife! You just die! That’s it!
There are people who really revel in that! And then look down on other people who yearn for something else, for something more than just materialism. I mean, you see this all the time with Dawkin’s wreckage of [word unclear] and that that type! I really dislike them.
Because to me it’s a really beautiful aspect of human nature, is the religious impulse. And the desire to escape the physical, the material, the desire for something more than this.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah.
Woes: And so when they mock that, I really think that’s a very nasty thing. I think it’s a very low thing.
PhilosophiCat: It’s a low vibe thing. And I think people who are drawn to that are, you know, they tend not to be people who have lived well! They’re generally not particularly virtuous people. They’re not inspiring people. And if that’s how you’re going to live, then why would you want to believe in an afterlife where those things actually matter?
[20:14]
Woes: Yeah, yeah.
PhilosophiCat: So in some ways it’s very self-serving for people like that to believe such a thing. If they were to become spiritual, or even just religious, they would have to change their outlook on life, and their own behaviours, and thoughts. And that would probably be a little bit difficult.
Woes: Well yes. Especially, because of the age we live in they would have no apparatus with which to address those questions. I mean, they would be a fish out of water. Whereas as if they stay in this:
“Oh! Oh! God’s a lot of rubbish! The flying spaghetti monster!”
If they stay in that arena, then they know how to handle it. And they can seem clever. Which is, …
PhilosophiCat: Yes. Which is, it’s the opposite of being spiritual when you are that invested in your own ego. And this is maybe part of the problem, because even people who are religious tend to still be very materialist. In the sense that I don’t get the impression that they truly believe in something beyond this world. It’s kind of, it’s just something they do on Sunday mornings. And maybe they like certain platitudes and cliches that inspire them, or make them feel good in some way.
But they don’t come across as particularly spiritual in terms of just really being in touch with themselves, and being in touch with the divine on a regular basis.
And I can’t fault them for that, because none of these religions really provide that pathway. And so then you’ve got these cringy 70 year old atheists making fun of religion. And part of me can kind of see where they’re coming from.
Woes: Yeah. I mean, I don’t really have much experience to draw on here. But I would wonder whether we get back to the issue of the conformist and the outsider. Because it might well be that these religions don’t provide that kind of thing, because most people just don’t need it. What they need is just to be told:
“Here’s what god wants you to do. Here’s what god expects of you.”
PhilosophiCat: Well for most people that’s sufficient, because most people are NPCs. And they don’t really have that impulse for more. So all that they really need is just something to kind of keep them away from sin, or making major mistakes in their life. So that they’re at least they’re maybe not good people. But they’re at least not bad people!
Woes: Yes. Exactly! And yeah that’s fine. There’s nothing wrong with that. I don’t think we should be too picky, if that’s what works for the vast majority of the public, then that’s probably what the Church, and whatever else, should be providing.
The issue is that it does leave them vulnerable to people like the new atheists, who can just mock all of the doctrine, and the rituals, and stuff. And then the religious person cannot defend it, because he just doesn’t understand. I mean, even when called upon to defend this stuff, he can’t do it.
PhilosophiCat: Well, he’s trying to defend the spiritual with something material! He’s trying to defend god and his beliefs with rationality and empiricism. But these things are outside of that realm!
Woes: See I think this is what breaks, …
PhilosophiCat: You’re trying to measure something that’s not measurable!
Woes: Yeah, I think this is what Brideshead Revisited is about, I don’t know, if you’ve ever read that, or seen the TV series. But the main character starts it, and it says:
“Set in the 20s, and the 30s.”
Like 100 years ago, obviously. Not now [chuckling]! That would be very strange! And the main character starts it as one of these smug atheists who is deriding Christianity, and Catholicism. But by the end of the novel he’s converted to Catholicism! [chuckling] So it’s really [chuckling] quite, … It’s quite funny! The way that it happens.
And, you know, one summary of that, is that it’s about the operation of god’s grace upon an individual throughout his life. Which I thought was a nice summary.
But yeah. And at one point he’s mocking. He said:
“Well, what’s the priest for, if he’s just a conduit! A conduit between the believer and the divine. But the believer can have a direct relationship with the divine. Then what’s the point of the priest?”
Yeah, this kind of stuff. Sort of pedantic nitpicking. The kind of stuff that I have suffered, and many others have suffered from the centrists on YouTube, in past years. Where they pick up on some silly thing like that, and think they’re clever. It’s amazing how, well, yeah, let’s not get into that.
I think I was going to talk about the “midwit” thing [chuckling]! We don’t need to get into that!
I think in the notes that we made beforehand you wanted to talk about how conservatism, how the Right has reacted to the vacuum left by Christianity. And the atheistic age.
[25:52]
PhilosophiCat: Well I wouldn’t necessarily say reacting to a vacuum left by religion. But that does actually, I think play a role into the habitual reactionaryism of the Right, because when you’re lacking that spiritual impulse and you’re looking for meaning you’re going to find that somewhere to latch on to. Now there are plenty of causes in life that you could take up some more spiritual than others but we all kind of go looking for them to a greater, or lesser extent now the Right has this problem of a tactical lag where they tend to pick up issues that are already irrelevant by the time they’ve picked them up. And I mean, that this is probably going to be unpopular to say. But I hope people will hear me out I don’t want to upset anybody just keep an open mind. There are certain issues on the Right that we probably need to de-emphasize in our conversations and I think. One of those is the issue of White replacement this is still a critical issue in homogeneous countries and they should still fight that fight but in places where White births are now the minority the demographic ship has unfortunately already sailed and continuing to fight yesterday’s battle especially these yesterday’s battles that have already been lost at the expense of failing to look ahead in the future and plan strategies for what’s to come, rather than what already was, you know. And an example of that is just the appalling response of many of these leading figures on the right to properly respond to this issue of medical tyranny. Because a lot of them were still too busy looking at this lost demographic battle, or engaging in all manner of intellectual masturbation on the internet. And so they didn’t see this great threat of globalist authoritarianism masquerading as a pandemic. So in this sense the Right isn’t even reactionary. But I would like to maybe coin the term delayed reactionary like, because of this tendency to focus on these already lost battles instead of the ones we can still fight and there’s like there seems to be this huge reluctance on the right to let go of these old issues there’s this strong emotional attachment to it.
Woes: Well which I get it.
PhilosophiCat: I mean, I can understand that very much. But we do need to be focused on current and relevant issues and issues that we can still win. And when you have this endless focus on what are now essentially lost causes. And I don’t want to say that to be blackpilling to anybody but I’m just trying to be realistic and pragmatic here this uses a mental bandwidth that most people just don’t have and sure demographics are important there’s value in making people aware of it and telling the truth about these issues. But I kind of liken it to arguing about the civil war like it might be true that the south was treated unfairly and history has lied about it. But it’s irrelevant now we can’t go back in time and win the civil war I mean.
Woes: Like I remember talking to someone in British nationalism an older person and I used the term some we were talking about gay rights, or something, and I mentioned the gay pride festival sort of thing how, you know how degenerate it is when they’re doing this stuff on the street and all this. And I said:
“Yeah I said gay pride and this older person said gay why do you call them gay they’re queer call them cool and it’s like.
PhilosophiCat: I don’t like the way that word sounds.
Woes: I don’t know I don’t like either. But I also thought that battle was lost in the battle for the word queer, or gay was lost like 60 years ago. And it really just doesn’t matter anymore I mean, yeah you can say [30:00] gay actually means happy but no, it doesn’t anymore it just doesn’t so just [] move on for god’s sake is its that’s an example of these sort of past battles which and part of.
PhilosophiCat: It’s just spurginess like to be honest part of it is just the Right’s tendency towards spurginess but, you know. What we need to be doing now instead of looking a decade behind us is looking a decade ahead to what’s going to be happening post Great Reset and understand that everything they’ve already done to us was designed to break down society so that they could do to us what they are doing now and the relevance of talking about demographic issues should probably now be in the context of the idea that the places where racial and national identity was most broken down have ultimately been the weakest links against this New World Order. And I think the time has probably come to kind of ally with anybody who stands against this global tyranny. Because I think people of every race can agree that multiculturalism was bad for their societies and allowed for this kind of a takeover.
Woes: Yeah. And also that even applies to the newcomers in European societies who clearly don’t. I mean, they’re obviously not happy here. And it’s just obvious. They know that they don’t really belong here it’s I mean, even saying that I’m worrying about the hate speech laws. But it’s obviously true.
PhilosophiCat: Well, look,
Woes: If it weren’t the case, then they wouldn’t be moaning about White privilege and all the rest of it.
PhilosophiCat: Look it’s hard to live in a country that’s not yours in a culture that’s not yours I say that as somebody who’s lived in multiple countries. And even when I was living in other White countries that were not the countries that I grew up and I wasn’t familiar with it I didn’t feel like I fit in there it was hard it was a challenge. And if you’re not born there. And you don’t grow up in its just never going to feel like a comfortable fit generally speaking. And the greater the distance between you and your adopted culture and nation, the harder that is. And the more stressful it is. But, you know, our people are all mixed up in different countries now. And it’s going to be pretty hard to undo that it may not really be possible.
Woes: Well, what I was going to say is that everyone has been tricked and we’ve all been tricked it’s very easy for us to be angry at, you know, black people who commit a lot of crime. Pakistanis who do a lot of child grooming especially of White children. I mean, it’s a very natural impulse to think various things which I’m not going to say on air just. As if they were violated by our group they would recognize that group reality the breach. So it’s a very natural thing and also there is just the as you said, the dislocation, the sensor. So I think everyone was tricked in one way, or another here. But we were told don’t worry the demographics won’t change very much don’t worry the culture won’t change very much and then multiculturalism is a real an unfortunate reality diversity is our strength, you know, multiculturalism is a gift that you should be glad of and then, like most recently your own culture is awful and your own culture doesn’t even exist. And now with the Great Reset, or the Covid age we seem to be moving into another age which is just there is no culture really there is only consumerism.
PhilosophiCat: Right. And that was the end goal. And so focusing on these issues of multiculturalism and diversity I mean, what’s done is done, you know, where can we put the brakes on how can we stop this slide into the metaverse, or whatever it is they’re trying to sell us next.
Woes: Yeah. I mean, just before we go on I should say there are people in the live chat there are some people reacting very vociferously to what you I’m saying.
PhilosophiCat: I’m sure they are. And I can completely understand why they would.
Woes: Yeah and I understand. As well, you know, it is a it’s such an annoying thing to hear someone say it sounds like a defeatist attitude.
PhilosophiCat: Well no, I’m trying to prevent the opposite of that. So let me clarify. The only issue that matters right now is this is uniting against this medical tyranny. This New World Order this Great Reset. Because, if we lose on this issue we lose on everything else too, because this one is for all the marbels. If you ever want to be able to fight your demographic battles again we have to first unite and get rid of these oligarchs that are trying to destroy us all. Then we can go back to our petty demographic squabbles we can go back to reclaiming our homelands. I mean, I don’t get to live in the country that I was born in that I want to live in, you know, [35:00] I wish I could and I can’t, because of these people so I get it I totally get it I would love to go back and live where I want to live.
Woes: Yeah, I think the key issue here is we are seeing the start of our level of tyranny that we have. None of us in the West have ever lived through, or our parents, or our grandparents. So this is something new and something that we are going to have to come to grips with. Because, as you say, if this does come to pass if it is fully implemented rebellion on any other issue especially like demographics will be completely impossible.
PhilosophiCat: What are you going to do complain that your gulag isn’t all your same race and ethnicity yeah we’re crying out loud!
Woes: The thing is I’ve said this before I am when I tried to communicate with Twitter three years ago the let the emails back from them would be signed Twitter. And I think so you’re up against an entire monolith it’s not a human being it’s an entirely.
PhilosophiCat: No it’s this hulking leviathan.
Woes: And I re bring this up. Because I think exactly it is and I bring this up. Because I think that’s the sort of relationship between the individual and the citizen and the state that we’re now going to that is going to be brought in where you don’t send a fucking chance against that, because there is no human at the other side it’s just someone who’s maybe someone who’s pressed a button to send that default email, or it’s maybe even an algorithm, because it doesn’t from their point of view they don’t need to take you seriously.
PhilosophiCat: No they haven’t lost like they have all the power why would they suddenly stop what they’re doing and say oh gee, you know, I think we’ve made people suffer enough we’ll go back to how things were! They’re not going to do that and people need to emotionally accept this I don’t mean to sound, you know, harsh, or overly critical, because I know people are emotionally struggling with this change in their reality it was very sudden and even for myself as somebody who’s kind of watched for well over a decade and expected something like this at some point in my lifetime I didn’t anticipate it to come like this, or as quickly as it did, or as soon as it did. Very few very few of us would have expected that so, you know, there is a bit of a grieving period that people need to go through. And there is a bit of a period where people need to kind of let go of some of those emotional attachments. And that includes emotional attachments to old ideological issues it’s more important now to just stand side by side with anyone who will oppose this leviathan and do what we can to kind of stop it, or reverse it. And I don’t want people to be like well that’s defeat us, because no we can we do still have a chance to potentially win on this issue. And this is why I said before, that spirituality is so important, because you won’t win without that you won’t have the fighting spirit if you don’t have that and you won’t have the mental fortitude to withstand the pressure that’s going to come in the future if things were to get much, much worse how many people would crumble how many good fighters would we lose just because they weren’t psychologically strong enough to get through this. And. It’s really just a question of well we need to survive what do we. What’s. The best way to do that? Now, I don’t think that everything’s completely lost and this kind of brings me to kind of the a sister topic to this which is the sort of Left-wing reactionarism that we’re starting to see. And I think this is a really positive sign I’ve noticed this mostly on Twitter. But I don’t talk to. A lot of these people in real life for obvious reasons. But I have noticed this interesting trend where the Left is increasingly being forced to take on and defend these very indefensible positions and they’re switching now into becoming reactionary themselves. One example of this would be how we so often now find them defending paedophilia of all things which you any normal person would be like how could you defend that and still think that you look good doing that to normal people. But they’re fine they’re now finding the issues that they take up based on what the Right says about them. And I think this indicates a shift that is maybe it’s subtle for now but very significant. Because the Left has always had a really clear I they’ve had this really clear idea of what their ideology is and the Right has always reacted to that the Right reacts to what the Left says, or does we’re often defining ourselves in opposition to what the Left says and does. And now the Left is taking up these indefensible positions, because they’re flailing and [40:00] they’re reacting. And, you know, an example of that would be like recently on Twitter Donald Trump Jr was kind of trolling the Democrats regarding this issue of voter IDs and saying oh well the unvaccinated shouldn’t be allowed to vote and when the Left agreed they were sort of forced to argue in favour of voter IDs. And this is straight out of olinsky’s Rules for Radicals you make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
Woes: Right.
PhilosophiCat: Which they used to do to us they used to do that to us they used to force the right to defend the most ridiculous and cringy things like Nazism and things that no normal person is ever going to agree with. But now we do the same to them by forcing them to defend paedophiles and the average person looks at this and they’re absolutely disgusted and horrified by the Left. So if you can force your opponent to defend the most extreme parts of their ideology you can take them out onto a really thin rope.
Woes: Absolutely. I think olinsky’s Rules for Radicals is something that we should be studying a lot.
PhilosophiCat: Absolutely. And yeah. I mean, why not use their own weapons against them like the Left is really good at alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Because to do those requires you to really have no integrity no moral scruples no principles. It’s all about how do we win and get power and the Right tends to come from a perspective being like well these principles matter. And we have to play by the rules. And we need to be virtuous about this that’s not politics like that’s how you lose in politics. And this is why I don’t like being involved in politics anymore, because I just find it very dirty. But it is nice to see this shift. And I think when you can call the Left out on their own hypocrisy like that it doesn’t really require the right to compromise their own values. And this allows us to kind of make up for some of this tactical lag that the Right has always suffered from that has always prevented us from being able to go on the offence. So this is kind of a sign of which way the winds are blowing. And I think the Right really needs to take advantage of this while it’s still young and new.
Woes: Yeah and I just want to get back to you, because obviously what you said earlier is very controversial. And some people so one person has summarized your position she’s saying join with diversity to win ergo she’s saying diversity is our strength.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah I can understand all right come on.
Woes: She’s not saying that for god’s sake get real.
PhilosophiCat: Well I can understand why. Some people might think that I’m not saying that you need to marry and have kids with these people. I’m just saying you shake hands call a truce for now and go join against our common enemy that is currently in a much more stronger and powerful position than our group, or that group, or that group right. This is to everybody’s advantage it kind of reminds me of how the native Americans were so busy fighting amongst themselves that they didn’t just unite against the collective threat of like White settlers, you know, now they complain that oh White people took our land and stuff. It’s like, well you guys were too busy killing each other.
Woes: Yeah.
PhilosophiCat: History could have gone very differently had they not done that.
Woes: Yeah. And that is… I mean, this is our reality of the current situation that it’s not nice. I mean, I understand why people. And the thing is you and I more than most people have in the past devoted our saying well yeah devoted ourselves to racial identity as some you might say I don’t know what term you would want to use. So it’s not like this is probably these days.
PhilosophiCat: No term they’re all so bad.
Woes: Yeah that also poison that. But it’s not as if you and I are mocking people who take these positions what. Well, what you’re saying. And what I’m probably. I mean, I’m sympathetic with is we have to be realistic we have to work from where we actually are not from where we would like to be and something that we would like to be the only issue that really matters. Unfortunately something else has been brought in that really matters.
PhilosophiCat: It Trump’s this I don’t I kind of take the position that Andrew Anglin takes that this really is the only issue that matters right now and for now that is true that could change in the future. Taking this up as your primary issue. And the most important issue doesn’t mean that you have to stop caring about the other things, or that those things are no longer important. But if you’re one of the people in the chat who’s upset about this and you’re upset, because your main your main issue is that well you want your people to survive your people aren’t going to survive if [45:00] we don’t defeat this common enemy your people are not going to survive in a gulag your country is not going to survive and your culture is not going to survive they’ll bring in Mark Zuckerberg’s Mark Zuckerberg’s metaverse. And that will be your reality, you know, there will there will be no more of this stuff that you all are claiming to care about. So if you want to preserve that. And you want to have a fighting chance to save those things then this is the issue that has to be tackled. First and foremost. Because otherwise you’re going to be living as like some unvaccinated diaspora around the world with no political power no homeland and, you know, hoping you can have a few babies that might survive and stay out of the gulag themselves. And it’s going to be a very hard life. So that’s not the life that I want for my kids, or grandkids. And I’m sure that’s not the life that anybody in the chat would want for their descendants. So I’m not saying this from a place of defeatism, or not caring about what happens to our people, or any other people like I don’t have any animosity towards other races either. And I’m sure they would all like to survive just as much as we do. And most of them don’t like multiculturalism either. So let’s point let’s put the blame where it belongs the oligarchs who have done this to all of us who have lied to all of us who have sold us this cultural poison over the last few decades and work together to get back the things we all want which is our own homelands our own cultures our own people.
Woes: Yeah yeah, sorry.
PhilosophiCat: I’m happy to take other comments from people in the chat if they want more clarification on this, or they’re feeling particularly strongly about anything I said I am kind of just speaking off the top of my head here so I do apologize my words haven’t been measured enough, or are coming off no, you know, overly harsh.
Woes: Listen listen listen this is an issue that we have to confront the people who like you and me we have to grasp this nettle. And we have to find ways to analyze it and articulate it. Because the people that we talk to the people who listen to us are not going to its something that a lot of them are not going to like to hear.
PhilosophiCat: No. And I think the psychology of that is very similar to the people who thought that taking the jab would buy them their freedom, because it was too emotionally and psychologically uncomfortable for them to accept the reality of this tyranny that’s coming into our lives unopposed.
Woes: Yeah,
PhilosophiCat: It’s scary it is.
Woes: Yeah it certainly is. Somebody’s asking why does she think that White people are incapable of winning on their own now see. This is what I mean, I understand White people are great the White race has achieved a great deal it’s very impressive it’s got compassion creativity high IQ all. The rest of it. But it’s well can’t do you want to what we.
PhilosophiCat: We do have a lot of great things about our people collectively. There are certain traits and virtues that our bio-spirit has produced, you know. But there are also other traits that are not so advantageous in this current climate including being extremely trusting. This tendency to trust authority to trust each other to trust the government to trust the media to trust the science now, you know, this I could give a whole talk on how White people’s lack of spirituality has resulted in them becoming too enamored of messians that’s a big part of the problem.
Woes: I would also mention I was up in Scotland a couple of months ago and there it’s much more homogeneous, you know, demographically than where I usually live. And yet and the adherence to covert restrictions is much greater there than it is down here. And I think that’s, because of the racial homogeneity. I think that it’s much harder to police a multicultural. And that’s not to say that multiculturalism is good, or whatever I’m just noting it as an interesting byproduct part of what has made White people so vulnerable to the whole covert thing is that they are so trusting of authority and their own institutions they assume that their society is benign that their institutions are doing. What they should be doing.
PhilosophiCat: Because that’s what we evolved to expect and nobody trusts the government.
[50:00]
Woes: Yeah exactly. And then that also links to what happened recently in the Netherlands where the these and Morgoth again brought this up that the riots against the Covid stuff it seemed to be they seemed to be foreigners it didn’t seem to be Dutch people who were rebelling against that.
PhilosophiCat: Well in America apparently African-Americans have the lowest vaccination rate in the country.
Woes: Yes the same in Britain.
PhilosophiCat: Because they don’t trust the government and why should they especially, you know, whether they believe this rightly, or wrongly they’ve been taught in schools and through the media that the government has been racist and historically oppressive against them. So why would they now trust the government if. That’s what they believe.
Woes: Yeah, well.
PhilosophiCat: White people what White people don’t realize is the government has also been pretty oppressive to us in some ways. And we shouldn’t trust them either.
Woes: Yeah they’ve been lying to us for 17 well for a long time very long time. But they don’t know that the White public and now, I want to emphasize what I just said there about the Netherlands I’m not therefore saying that means that refugees are actually great. Because they’ll help us against Covid and.
PhilosophiCat: No that doesn’t mean that it’s a wonderful thing. But they’re saying this is the reality the reality is that these people are in our countries. And they can be leveraged against the same enemy that brought them there in the first place. I mean, use the tools you have at your disposal don’t be so ideologically possessed. And so and get stuck into this Fergie purity spiraling that you’re not willing to work with somebody who can be helpful to you. Now when the media smears these anti-lockdown, or anti-mandatory backs rallies as being far-Right neo-Nazis it’s a lot harder for them to do that when half the crowd is, you know, brown, or black.
Woes: Yeah. That’s true that is true it’s an. I mean, I think that the issue really is just power. Because, if you have power you can basically just declare. You can just write the narrative. You can just say. Yeah, okay it looks like it’s fairly diverse but actually it’s far-Right. You can just declare it. And people will believe.
PhilosophiCat: Well we see this attempt to redefine now what far-Right means and all far-Right means now is someone who doesn’t support the globalist narrative. That’s all it means yeah.
Woes: And I remember noting this in 2019, because it’s interesting. Because I know that I absolutely didn’t predict coved and all this but in 2019 there was a sense of that we were like the cam before the storm there was a sense that things are in flux and what one of them one of the aspects of it was that it’s a sort of vague situation and anyway, yeah I want to get back to the these quick, because there have been quite a lot of Superchats posted so here are all right okay I’ll just get them, because we have been going for nearly an hour now and we haven’t should we get should we return to, I think we should do the Superchats at the end and return to what we, you know, our plan for this chat.
PhilosophiCat: It’s entirely up to you I’m flexible.
Woes: Yeah we did we’re going to mention Jordan Peterson.
PhilosophiCat: Oh yes a great example of what we were just talking about no.
Woes: Yeah, well yeah go into that explain that.
PhilosophiCat: I mean, Jordan Peterson is an example of like he let’s just look at his utter failure to recognize the tyranny right in front of him. He took the jab he thought it would buy his freedom he complains endlessly on Twitter now that it didn’t he was just doing it right before I came on this stream even. None of his years of education and study on the subject of tyrannical prepared him to see happening right in front of him the most tyrannical move in history and he fell for it now at least he admits now that he was duped but he’s still you can tell he still isn’t really coming to grips with this, because he’s still continuing to complain well I don’t understand why I have to take this expensive test in quarantine to come back to my own country, because I’m double jabbed. And I have natural immunity. And it’s like stop freaking legitimizing! The narrative this is like stop being mad that the government isn’t playing by their own rules! That’s what governments do like just get used to it.
Woes: And this is like the cliche of the true believer who’s put up against the wall and he’s like well I obeyed the rules I spread the doctrine why are you killing me?
PhilosophiCat: Exactly.
Woes: It’s tragic. So what would you say [55:00] about Jordan Peterson’s mentality I mean. I do think he’s one of these over socialized academics who’s right just obsessed with being socially accepted and respected by his peers.
PhilosophiCat: That’s one reason. I mean, there are a few reasons I think why he didn’t recognize this why he was duped and why he’s so upset about it so first he’s got this attachment to modern liberal ideology he’s a rationalist ultimately that’s going to lead to a belief in the science. And I mean, rationality is not bad. But it does tend to trap anyone who has no other tools at their disposal like spirituality. Second his fame went to his head his ego overtook him as you were saying this desire train remain popular I would say probably some a lot of peer pressure a desire to remain as part of this in-group of the Intellectual Dark Web they’re all pro-vax pro-globalists. And there’s a lot of worm tongues in that crowd too like Ben Shapiro whispering in his ear and stuff third, as I said, is lack of spirituality. Which I would say, you know. Some people might argue with me on that and be like no no he’s a spiritual person, because he talks it doesn’t matter it’s evident by his statement that he’s repeated several times that he behaves as if god exists. Which says to me that he’s a person who has not had a transcendent experience himself. But his rationality tells him that god could, or should exist. Therefore it’s safer to believe as if that might be true. This is not a spiritual position this is a rationalist position. So I think he wants I think he has an impulse for spirituality. But that modern liberal ideology that he’s really attached to is going to prevent him from finding that. And fourth he’s just fundamentally kind of a weak person. I mean, he loves his antidepressants he comes across as this anxious neurotic fearful person. And this is a sign of someone who has not mastered their mind. We can also see this in the fact that his daughter started calling the shots after his fame kind of broke him down which is a really odd dynamic for a grown man to start letting his daughter direct his life and his public brand. So it’s not entirely surprising that Jordan Peterson would do what he did. But I look at this. And I feel that this is emblematic of kind of our people as a collective and to address what that person said in the chat earlier why would you think that White people can’t solve this on our own this kind of person is why and Jordan Peterson’s just a famous person. But there are thousands just like him out there who aren’t famous millions probably.
Woes: Yeah. I mean, would you say that this is it one thing that always has always struck me about Jordan Peterson is that he is not there’s no masculinity about him he seems almost not just in his high-pitched squeaky voice, but also his sort of prissy body language his way there’s one publicity photo of him in particular which I was surprised I was surprised that he let this one go, because he looks like a sort of like a school head mistress like pressing his lips together and it he’s very feminine he’s there’s a lack of masculine assuredness, or strength, or stability about the guy. And I’m not claiming to be perfect myself. I’m just saying it’s interesting that this is the guy who is offered grooves of young men as a father figure an authority figure.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah you don’t need to be perfect to observe these things and analyze them and I mean, you know, in some ways and analyzing that is maybe helpful for someone who is themselves not perfect so that they can see how they might mirror those things. He does come across as lacking in masculinity and in another time he probably would have been an ascetic who studied in the temples he’s definitely not a warrior type I think we could probably all agree on that he’s an academic he likes his books he likes the mental exercises and what contributes to him not being masculine in that kind of more aesthetic context is his lack of mental mastery and his lack of spiritual gravitas this is what makes him seem so emasculated. And so many people looked up to him as this leader, or they thought of him as a father figure they thought oh he’s someone wise who has all the answers to ease their existential suffering. And then he reveals himself to be this really flawed person well it’s easy to understand why people would project that ascetic archetype onto him [60:00] and subconsciously assume all these things about him that come with that archetype. And then, of course, as he became publicly overexposed and had that very public breakdown the reality was that while he kind of presents himself to be this ascetic type he doesn’t really have the essence the inner essence of what asceticism is. He doesn’t have spirituality he doesn’t have mental mastery and in many ways, as you say, he’s very feminine.
Woes: Yeah, it’s unfortunate and, of course, now we’ve seen this is sort of a culminated at least for now it might have a future even greater culmination. But for now it’s culminated in this that he was duped by the covert stuff and that he just did what he was told and now is in disbelief I find that amazing. I mean, part of it does seem to be the standard northern Europe I think he’s Swedish of ancestry Norwegian something like that northern European desire to be a good person and to do the right thing especially to help other people to keep them safe and to obey authority to obey the authorities of your society. I mean, it’s all very, you know, it’s very tribal, you know, it feels very primal even in this very modern man you see these very tribal tendencies. So you can understand that he just thought well I’ll do the right thing I’ve got it I’ve got to do the Right I’ve got to do what they’re telling me to do.
PhilosophiCat: But that right. But it was a big decision on his part he was he thought that it wasn’t that he thought that he was doing the right thing, but he was afraid. And he thought conformity would get him his freedom back. And if we just do what we’re told. Like this is what shows that he’s lacking the wisdom that people assumed he had, because part of wisdom is seeing things for what they really are and being able to accept that. And as you were saying before work with the reality that we have. And he was unable to see what the reality is he’s unable to work with that. And I mean, he’s a person who has a lot of I guess book learning. I don’t think he’s a bad person I think he’s probably a very kind-hearted man and who genuinely, you know, wanted to help others. And it was just too much for him I wouldn’t mind just sitting down and talking with the guy someday I’m sure he’s a very pleasant person to talk to. But I can kind of sympathize with what happened to him, because when people build you up in their minds as someone who can save them, you know. I can only imagine the pressure he was under and I’m sure, you know, I can kind of sympathize with this I’m sure you can too where people project on to you that you’re this person who can fix their problems just because of your public persona and not really realizing that you’re your own struggles too yeah we’re all learning we’re just at various different stages of learning some of us have learnt different things than others. But I remember talking to waves of that.
Woes: Expect the weight of that expectation and for him that must have been massive.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah. Well, I remember talking to you maybe a couple of years ago, or something you still had your YouTube channel. And I know people used to write you. And they would write you with some really heavy problems, because you were a public figure you had a big channel you seemed like you might know what you were talking about. And then people just like they’re just looking for somebody to help them through this life that they’re suffering with and you, of course, would be suffering with your own problems and didn’t have the emotional space to deal with that. So I can imagine for Jordan Peterson being is even more high profile it was really a lot of pressure. And I can understand why it would crush him. And I think he’s self-aware enough to know that about himself but, you know, at the end of the day, probably he shouldn’t have been so aggressive of over exposing himself like that and building himself up I think it did go to his head a little bit. And now he’s like now he. And for a while he was telling people to go get the jab people who trust him and believe him how many young men got myocarditis, because Jordan Peterson told him to get the jab we’ll never know but maybe there were some.
Woes: Probably there were I mean, statistically it would seem likely. And I wonder what he will advocate about the jab, you know, in future, you know, after this experience, you know, this latest thing I wonder if he’ll continue saying. Yeah, but you should get you should get the first two at least and at least one, or two boosters.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah. I mean, he’s very angry now. Because the government isn’t holding up their end of the bargain by giving back [65:00] freedoms and he’s having a lot of trouble coping with that emotionally as are many people who voluntarily got jabbed thinking that it would allow them to travel, for example.
Woes: Well, indeed. I mean, a year ago that was the promise being made that the vaccine would if not take us back to normal, because they were saying even then that we would never go back to normal and it at least it would enable us to open up our society again and go back to work and start traveling. And all that was absolutely not! Born out.
PhilosophiCat: It was such obvious BS from the start! But you try to tell people this. And they just really wanted to believe that there was a ticket back to freedom. And so they didn’t listen. And now, here we are.
Woes: Yeah, it’s remarkable. I mean, we have seen and this is something that I’ll probably be going into quite a lot in throughout Millennial we’ve seen all of these cliches play out about the false promises from the corrupt tyrants and the shifting of the goal posts the just inventing of evidence the manipulation of data the problem reaction solution, the scapegoating of a particular part of the population, you know, all of this stuff has happened and it’s remarkable that people haven’t seen it I haven’t recognized it, because we were all warned about this stuff, you know, I remember reading studying 1984 at school. And they were saying this is how it happened this is how it starts they demonize a demographic it’s all happening right now! It’s absolutely amazing! Absolutely fucking amazing that this is happening and there are still a majority of people who are yet to realize it I don’t know if they ever will.
PhilosophiCat: No. I think a lot of people. I mean, it the more you’ve invested in a narrative the harder it is to admit you were wrong. This is why you see people doubling down on some really stupid things, because well they’ve already made this big show of believing in getting vaccinated and getting boosters and lockdowns work and the government loves us. And it’s like it’s gonna be hard for them to backtrack from that without losing face and most people are too egotistical to be willing to do that and to say I was wrong so I do give Jordan Peterson a lot of credit for that, because he did publicly state that he was wrong.
Woes: That is laudable okay let’s do the is there anything else that we wanted to go into.
PhilosophiCat: I think nothing that is going to fit within the time that we have. I don’t think so.
Woes: Let’s take your Superchats okay we’ll do the Superchat all right.
PhilosophiCat: You probably have a few on a particular topic so okay yeah let’s give them their airtime.
Woes: Okay I am surrounded by non-Whites in my Belgian city of birth all I see at school is headscarves with many children we’re fucked I’m moving to a White area in the USA so yeah, so well that’s okay I don’t know if there’s much to say about that I’m sorry about that situation I really am.
PhilosophiCat: That’s one that’s one option you can do.
Woes: Yeah it is. And some people will castigate someone for doing that others will say it’s pragmatic it’s you’ve just got to do what you can. Someone else said here’s a little White pill I recently got a religious vaccine exemption from my employer and that’s good that’s someone who’s I know is into Hinduism and Buddhism. And so on, so that’s quite interesting someone else said Mary ewell. Thank you very much thank and thank you for sir Charlton the beast. Thank you for that and yeah, okay that’s great that those were for the Golden One I do apologize that I forgot about the Superchats during that time okay just to find the one okay. Do you think that illiberal thought has any kind of future close to the mainstream evaloa and his elk are unfairly maligned as evil fascists but the vitalism of their thought and it’s track record for inspiring others to speak for themselves ella. Do you think that a liberal thought has any kind of future closer to the mainstream.
PhilosophiCat: It would really require a change in the Constitution of the mass man, you know, thought like evil as, for example, he himself said that he was only writing for the differentiated man not the mass man. We would need to elevate the masses to probably a bit of a higher level of consciousness before they [70:00] could get any value out of that, or understand it, or want to latch onto that. But. It’s always a possibility, you know, who knows what could happen.
Woes: Okay and okay, here we go you’re kind of being naive on the demographic issue have you lived in environments where the administration, or power structure consists entirely of groups hostile to you can win on the epidemic and still lose on the demographics they were harming us even before the pandemic did you forget that.
PhilosophiCat: Well no I didn’t forget that. But I have a lot greater chance for my genetic legacy to survive if I’m not being gulagged. And that’s what they’re planning to do to us I think so as evidence by these camps that they’re building in some countries. And I think that’s the I think that’s the future that they’re planning for those of us who want to remain unvaccinated.
Woes: Yeah and again. This is something that will be explored thoroughly throughout Millennial.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah I’m sure other people have far more to say on that,
Woes: Yeah, and someone else says reasonable people will differ on which and which is the most significant issue, you know, demographics, or Covid. And I think that this is going to be one of the key things. I think it’s well have key schism that’s going to divide the movement is whether people think in Covid, or the demographics of the Great Replacement is the more important thing because, of course.
PhilosophiCat: Well, I have as a I have yet to hear a convincing argument for why demographics should be the primary issue that doesn’t just go back to basically somebody’s feels and their emotional attachment to the issue. There’s not going to be any demographic war to fight if you’re all vaccinated and sterilized all your babies are being born with heart problems, or your wives are having miscarriages, you know, that’s not going to solve the demographic problem.
Woes: No no especially if the immigrant groups remain unvaccinated and thus free.
PhilosophiCat: And keep in mind too that all of this sets a precedent this all sets a precedent for further medical tyranny, because if they can set the precedent to inject you with an experimental gene therapy that you didn’t consent to they can also forcibly sterilize you right. They can forcibly take your organs they can do anything to you bodily sovereignty is like a top-tier issue.
Woes: Yeah. I mean, I could see them saying. Well, there are some people who are born with an attachment to race and racial identity. And we can switch some genes to make sure that they don’t turn out that way. So we’re going to do that for the public good for everyone else’s.
PhilosophiCat: We’re not the ones who have that technology in our power though. So I mean, it could happen. But I don’t see it as being a realistic thing.
Woes: Well okay I would suggest it might well be realistic in the next few decades. And it would be built on the premise of that’s being established now with Covid. Okay can you ask her to address the issue that only White people are fighting this battle and diversity is so far almost entirely unwilling, or uninterested in joining us and someone actually did correct me on the Dutch thing apparently it was originally White people rebelling against covert restrictions. And then the Moroccans. And so on, just joined in, because it was a chance for a riot.
PhilosophiCat: I don’t know that’s necessarily true. I mean, the rallies in Australia had a lot of different people there including a lot of immigrants who were carrying signs saying that they didn’t move to Australia for this they had escaped tyranny in their previous country. And they were really impassioned about fighting on this issue. So I don’t think it’s only going to be White people willing to stand up for this. And I don’t actually see the majority of White people willing to do so now I mean, maybe it’s a proportion of population. But I don’t know that’s worth quibbling about. The fact is like regardless of the racial representation in the opposition to tyranny I don’t see why you wouldn’t just fight side by side with somebody who shares a common enemy with you I’m not, as I said, before. You don’t have to marry the person and have kids with them.
Woes: Yeah yeah, of course, it’s I mean. And the thing is this is something where. It seems to me that the Left were expert at this that feminists didn’t really care about gay rights. But they allied with the gay lobby in order to defeat the mainstream.
PhilosophiCat: Right they all allied together to undermine the Patriarchy.
[75:01]
Woes: Exactly. And you see this time, and time again with on throughout the course of the history of the Left over the last 100 years. They didn’t care they just did whatever was pragmatic. And what would yield the result that they wanted, or built towards the result that they wanted it wasn’t all, or nothing. Right now it was incremental and they understood the value of making compromises along the way in order to get to the end result that they wanted. And that’s why they’ve now got total cultural hegemony. I mean, there’s no conservatism in our social marie’s anymore so that’s. I mean, that shows you how effective that strategy can be if you do it, you know, intelligently. So I mean, at this point, yeah. I do think that we should be we need to be more flexible, because clearly, you know, this approach hasn’t worked for us. So far I don’t really see why it would start working for us now of yeah. And I think the key thing is fighting battles that see this is The thing that there is a bit of a contradiction here you’re saying that pragmatically so that we can get back to the demographic issue. But you’re also saying that the demographic issue is at least in some countries it’s done that the battle is lost permanently. So I think that this is our nuanced point and it’s and it’s not a point that a lot of people are going to enjoy hearing. But I think it is something that we have to face up to, if nothing else.
PhilosophiCat: In America is probably lost in France probably lost. In Poland no they can still fight that battle Slovakia go for it most of Eastern Europe I would say could still fight that battle most of Western Europe and North America not so much would be pretty hard to reverse that trend I’m not going to have enough babies to reverse the demographic trend and neither are any of you out there like it’s not mathematically possible. I mean, what is possible is that these vaccines, or whatever other variant they release is going to wipe out a huge amount of the population and those of us who are unvaccinated are the ones left standing that would change the game entirely.
Woes: Yeah ironically.
PhilosophiCat: I don’t know. I mean, it could happen I don’t know I’m not an expert I can’t say, but based on the information that we have now nobody has yet presented to me a good argument for why demographics would take precedence over medical tyranny, because and I’m open to having my mind change if somebody can give me one that isn’t based on feels.
Woes: Okay well here is one actually someone says her she’s got her priorities wrong government tyranny is temporary race is eternal.
PhilosophiCat: While race isn’t eternal, because other races in the past have been genocided ask the tasmanian aboriginals for a start is one of the most recent examples in history. That could get into some really interesting metaphysical territory in terms of like the racial totem from which our souls are drawn and, you know what would happen to a racial totem if all of the biological specimens died out. And there was nothing left available for that totem to express itself so we could debate for a long time on whether, or not, race is actually eternal and, or even what race actually is and that’s maybe outside the scope of this discussion.
Woes: Yeah and we should emphasize that cat is not they are saying race is just a load of rubbish.
PhilosophiCat: No I’m not saying it’s a social construct. And there are some really serious spiritual implications regarding racial issues, in my opinion. But this is part of why I say that this medical tyranny this New World Order takeover is such an important issue, because you won’t have the ability to fight this issue if they win.
Woes: That to me is the key thing, because people are saying in the chat most places in the US are still overwhelmingly White. The jews created Israel out of nothing. So there is no need for defeatism that is true. However, the jews created Israel with massive power, you know, massive institutional and academic authority and money we don’t have that. And that is the key and certainly we’re not going to be able to get those resources if we.
PhilosophiCat: No and neither do we have any kind of strong tribal instinct.
Woes: Yes yes.
PhilosophiCat: That’s another reality that we need to contend with the lack of a tribal instinct I think White people are more prone [80:00] to ally with people on an ideological, or religious level than they are on a racial level and that’s another reason why I say it might be beneficial to ally with any other race who’s willing to stand against globalist tyranny.
Woes: Yeah. And if I missed a globalist tyranny we’re not just talking about the latest annoying vaccine mandate, or whatever we’re talking about the entire mentality the entire infrastructure the global infrastructure of implementing tyranny and maintaining it.
PhilosophiCat: And a tyranny that is explicitly designed to wipe out race’s nations cultures and traditions.
Woes: Yes! That’s the thing is explicitly does. I mean, it’s built into it.
PhilosophiCat: So I don’t understand. And when that be when that is there when that is the long-term result I don’t know how you can say well demographics is a greater issue than fighting against this tyranny, because it is in fighting against that tyranny that you protect the demographic the demographic issue into the future.
Woes: Yeah. And I think everyone’s exactly like hold on hold on hold on hold on everyone who’s angry at cats should just remember what she just said right, because that she’s saying.
PhilosophiCat: Don’t be angry at me I’m a nice girl!
Woes: Yeah. But sometimes you want I people up people up and I’m sorry. And sometimes I’m a [] on Twitter.
PhilosophiCat: And I’m sorry I just can’t I’m saucy I’m feisty and I’m really a nice person at heart!
Woes: All right don’t get too garlic the point is this is a tactical strategic thing as much as anything else it’s not saying right we don’t care about race anymore we don’t care about demographics don’t care about identity we’re saying part of the that now has to be seen, or perhaps okay. And I think some people find that a bit disconcerting [Laughter] that’s true I think that that racial thing now should be properly seen as part of a struggle against a tyranny. And that you will only get the results you want in the demographics sphere if you’d first defeat that tyranny. There is no point trying to fight the demographics thing hoping that the tyranny will somehow not stop you, because it simply will that. There’s no getting around that. So we have to defeat the tyranny that there’s this is not really negotiable.
PhilosophiCat: It is that it is that same oligarchy that did the multiculturalism to us in the first place. And they did it to us so that they could do the Great Reset. So the demographic issue was only introduced, because it was a stepping stone on their way to the Great Reset! It’s part of the bigger issue. But it’s not the whole issue and that’s all I’m saying.
Woes: But you can’t defeat that part without defeating the whole of the greater issue that’s the.
PhilosophiCat: You need to strike at the root.
Woes: Yeah, okay.
PhilosophiCat: Who else is mad at me?
Woes: Was well I’ll just go kidding I’ll go through the list oh someone says this is a good guess to kick things off with she has the chat aggravated in a good way hail philosophical!
PhilosophiCat: I didn’t mean to come in and be a shit stir I’m sorry.
Woes: I know thank that’s super city so that’s obviously a fan of yours. Someone says I am still in the denial phase regarding the Flu World Order and I am aware. But I am aware of it. I wonder how it must feel for antifa to attack freedom fighters and bully them into obeying the state. Well, this is the thing actually just yesterday I saw an article about from Germany and apparently antifa were policing the mask wearing on trains. And actually physically removed people from a train carriage in I think Berlin who were not wearing the mask. And they were saying that we’re going to do the job that the police aren’t prepared to do.
PhilosophiCat: The police that. They wanted to defund.
Woes: Yeah yeah. But this is the thing. I mean, antifa. I mean, we don’t need to moan about this it’s an obvious point. But I will do it anyway it’s amazing how fucking obnoxious and arrogant and self-assured these people are, because all they’re doing is it well. I mean, it’s the opposite of what they should be doing and used to do. And it’s just remarkable. But yeah, there’s no need to go into that I guess, but apparently they shouted antiphon mask control that was how they announced themselves.
PhilosophiCat: I mean, look this is another example where you need to start applying alinsky’s Rules for Radicals against the Left and hold them to their own standards. There’s never been a better time to do that we could have a lot of fun with that.
Woes: I think we could and we [85:00] should probably it might be worth doing a stream specifically and only about that something very practical like that. Anyway so okay let’s go through these Catholic France supported the Protestants in the 30 years war for long-term gain we can do deals against one enemy with a smaller enemy in order to protect our communities beat the biggest threat and then deal with the rest later just banging your head on the just banging your head on the door of the train cars is pointless yes I would agree with that then someone says the Great Replacement is more important than everything else and then someone.
PhilosophiCat: Replacement is the Great Reset don’t forget.
Woes: Yeah. Yeah, okay and then someone asks. Do you think that the vaccine lowers fertility?
PhilosophiCat: I think it’s entirely possible and I personally am not going to take the risk and test it out on myself. I’ve just seen and heard from too many women who have had miscarriages still births I’ve heard of men like couples who were going for fertility treatments and then men’s sperm counts were down to zero after their vaccines, you know what why take the risk. If it doesn’t make any sense to me you’ve got it like a minuscule risk of having any serious effects from Covid. I mean, why would you even I don’t know some people just have a like they’ve got their priorities backwards in my opinion. But some people are saying that about me right now, so who am I to judge right yeah yeah.
Woes: So but yeah, it is why would you take the risk. Yeah, it’s just crazy. Yeah, okay someone says looking at this in terms of pure power my body my choice is dead and the Left hasn’t noticed given it’s profound myopia this could be of use to us if the situation changes for good, rather than ill. So this is about the abortion debate and the vaccine debate my body my choice this is again a way that we could hold the Left to their own standards.
PhilosophiCat: Precisely. The time is so right for it there’s they give us so many opportunities right now.
Woes: Yeah and then someone says how is it not possible to put people on aeroplanes back to a certain mythical African country and just withdraw their citizenship swell it’s completely possible to do that if you have power we don’t and those who do have power are dead against doing that sort of thing well it depends. I mean, I read that they’re changing the law in Britain so that citizenship can be revoked a few days ago anyway. And then finally someone says dang this is the most divided I’ve ever seen a Millennial chat. And I’ve been here. And I’ve been here for all of them.
PhilosophiCat: It wasn’t supposed to be this divisive I just I wasn’t planning to make the whole stream about this but people got all wound up I’m sorry for ruining your Christmas everyone.
Woes: No that look it’s fine. I think that it’s I think this is a necessary thing that we have to confront and, if nothing else just to test it and find out, you know what is the truth here how important should this be and should the Great Replacement still be a priority. I mean, people are going to disagree but we must be able to have that debate, because just artistically going on in the same way as before is just silly… I mean, we should be flexible it’s not as if we’re in power now and need to have an agenda all clearly laid out tomorrow. So I think we should be able to do this we should be able to have this debate well in a relatively civil manner.
PhilosophiCat: We need to be able to be flexible, because when you’re confronted against a leviathan it’s big and it’s massive but it moves slowly and the way to defeat that is to be agile and quick to be able to be dynamic to be flexible. And that means not clinging to these old lost battles and focusing on what we could still win where can we still gain ground where can we trick the enemy what’s when do we need to shift strategy. Because that’s no longer working. And you have to be it’s like people who I’m sure you’ve probably encountered some people like this who get into like Bitcoin and stuff right and they get too emotionally attached to their investment and they won’t sell when they should, or they buy at the wrong time, because they’re just like they can’t think strategically, because they’re too emotionally attached to something they’ve invested in and that’s maybe a more tangible example. But this is really [90:01] very much like that people in the movement have for a long time invested emotionally into this issue of demographics to our detriment I think, because we’ve made very little headway on this issue. And we have focused on this issue to the exclusion of others that we could have potentially won and then put it in that and in winning those other issues could have put us in a better position to go back to the demographic issue later.
Woes: Yeah, I agree someone’s saying that I skipped his second Superchat. But I didn’t see it added. So I’m sorry about that let me see I don’t know I didn’t see it let me think see I don’t know how to use these damn hyper chats on Odysee I don’t know how to scroll through them and just see them I mean, you’d think that would be an obvious thing for them to implement. So I’m sorry I can’t find your second Superchat, or hyper chat as they’re called on here anyway. So I apologize winter Phoenix forest all right. So I guess we could end it there that there will be people who are annoyed with you and, you know,
PhilosophiCat: I don’t worry about it too much this is to those people I say think on what I’ve said. You don’t have to accept it. You don’t have to agree with me. But I would ask that you go away and you reflect on how much of your attachment to the demographic issue is really just emotional ask yourself what would it mean for me if I let go of this issue is the most important thing in my life. And I’m not telling you that you should do that, or that you have to do that I could be wrong I’m not an expert maybe you guys are right I don’t know, maybe someday over the next few weeks one of you guys will send me a message and tell me something that convinces me to change my mind and i’ll have to come back on Millennial at the end and clarify it all for you, but all I just ask is that you just sit with it and think about it. You don’t have to agree with it and I do not hold it against anybody if they don’t agree with me.
Woes: Okay.
PhilosophiCat: Hopefully they don’t hold it against me either.
Woes: All right we’ve got just two on Entropy. So I’ll go through this please have Apollonian Germ on his guest it’s I had him on last year I like him very much I’ve got nothing against him. And I will certainly invite him next year. But I wanted to have that there were so many people that I wanted to invite this year. That’s the only reason that I didn’t invite Apollonian Germ. So I’ll certainly be inviting him next year. Okay my wife just gave birth to our second child before right before Thanksgiving right before Thanksgiving it’s a joyous occasion but a dark cloud looms on the horizon my employer wants me vaxxed I put in a religious exemption claim. But I doubt it will work I don’t want the jab I’m not sure what I will do. But I would I have two little ones so that’s good I’m glad. And I wish that situation yeah. And I wish I’m luck. Yeah. I mean, we there that we need to get far more organized with the religious exemption stuff and the medical exemption stuff it’s in every country it’s just a fucking as far as I can tell it’s just a disaster everyone’s just guessing on their own there’s no coordination we should be able to do much better than this I can’t really see why. We’re not doing better I mean, really that’s just a matter of putting it together. We need to do that okay.
And then someone says oh yeah here’s a question when you’re debating normies about conspiracies government corruption, etc., and they say you only believe that, because you’ve seen it on the internet how do you respond.
PhilosophiCat: I’ve literally never had somebody say that to me to be honest. But I have to say like I don’t go hard with people on conspiracy theories especially the ones that are really out there when I’m talking to normies I listen first to what they believe and I think. Like what are the key issues for them where’s the weak point in what they’re saying like too often when I see people trying to talk to normies about this stuff they’re too eager to just throw facts and theories at the other person hoping that something will stick. It’s not about you talking it’s about you listening to them and listening really closely finding the weak point in their thought and just gently poking at it over, and over, again planting little seeds and being willing to be patient. I never come at somebody with like weird conspiracy theories, or facts, or whatever if somebody tells me that they believe in the government and the media telling them to get these vaccinations and that they’re perfectly safe I don’t argue with them [95:01] about it I just ask questions.
Woes: Like have you ever heard of the USS Liberty that kind of thing.
PhilosophiCat: Well I’ve never asked I’ve never asked anybody that question.
Woes: I’m just kidding.
PhilosophiCat: But I would ask them probing questions and kind of like almost like a Socratic method on them why. Do you think that oh where did you get that idea have you considered it such and such is true, you know, I heard this somewhere I don’t know if it’s true. But it kind of gave me pause. What do you think about that and let them do the talking let them reason themselves into the position that you want them to believe most people don’t like being told what to think.
Woes: No no not at all they only like that when it comes from a clear authority something that they trust like the BBC, CNN, or whatever, and they agree with it they trust that author then they’ll accept just being told but when it’s another person no they don’t like that at all. I mean, it’s quite understandable it’s quite natural. So I’ve always find that the best thing is to just gently nudge them and say gently say this, or that and just let them realize on their own that is far more effective than you trying to hammer the just get them to agree.
PhilosophiCat: You gotta you’ve gotta treat them like they’re a horse they’ve gotta think it was all their idea you’ve gotta let them save face. And you’ve got to let them feel like they were intelligent to come to the conclusion that they came to it you can if you go in with it being about you and your ego you’re going to lose every argument yeah you might win on the facts but you’ll lose the person.
Woes: Exactly exactly this is the whole thing about winning the argument but losing the debate or, as you say, winning on the facts but losing the person. And it’s very easy, you know, in the heat of its so easy to get caught up in it. And you want to get through to them you want to just persuade them you want to just get them to see the bloody truth. And it’s very it makes you irate unless you consciously take a step back you’re going to consciously just it doesn’t matter it’s okay if they do if they leave this conversation still convinced of their own priors that’s fine it’s not the end of the world you gotta have that that detachment it’s very helpful.
PhilosophiCat: Yeah you cannot be attached to outcomes. And the thing is, if you want people to accept the truth from you first you have to cultivate their trust and their respect. And you don’t do that by condescending to them, or criticizing them. When you’re dealing with normies like you got to remember they’re not used to thinking critically it’s new for them, you know, treat them like they’re a child in some ways and be gentle with them be kind to them. Don’t go trying to dismantle their whole reality. Because that’s really like that can even be psychologically damaging for them you’re not going to you’re not going to make a lot of headway doing that so that’s my two cents on that take it for what it’s worth.
Woes: Yeah absolutely. And then finally. And it’s a completely different topic what was your take on Seth Rogen and his Twitter yeah I know and his tweet of cal star again what was your take on Seth Rogen and his tweet of shock that his Santa ink caused a reaction Rogan bashes Christmas then at shops when people respond does does this seem a routine worked out of getting of angering the public then claiming shocking levels of anti-semitism exists.
PhilosophiCat: As is the norm for his kind that is all I have to say about that! This is a reference this is a reference to our Twitter victory that cat had recently which is widely shared on Telegram.
Woes: And so it’s very funny yeah you want to go into that, or maybe not okay.
PhilosophiCat: We probably shouldn’t yeah all right so people can find it on Telegram. Yeah, it’s still on Twitter too I think.
Woes: So yeah, well as long as you’re still on Twitter so far. Yeah, okay excellent. Well this has been a very productive conversation yeah as I say there will maybe be some fallout from it. But I think it’s a necessary conversation it’s a necessary topic. And we’ve got to address this.
PhilosophiCat: So I’m happy to get the conversation started and I’m willing to be hated by a few people if it’s for the greater good so, as I said, I hope people just kind of take it on board and think about it and come to their own conclusions, you know, ultimately you got to do what you think is best. But, all right put it on to the ether. Anyway.
Woes: Okay what a gal all right. Well, thank you very much philosophicat for appearing on Millennial 2021
PhilosophiCat: My pleasure was I it was [100:02] it was more fun than I thought it would be I didn’t expect to get it.
Woes: So yeah. Yeah, it was. I mean, I get nervous about it as well. But I think we’re getting into the swing of it so excellent all right. Thank you very much. And I will be back fairly soon in about 20 minutes with Mark Malone. So all right. I’ll see you all then in the meantime thank you philosophicat. And I hope you’ll be on again next year yeah.
PhilosophiCat: Thank you and Merry Christmas, or yule, or whatever you celebrate to everyone out there and nice nice that you all could join us.
Woes: All right okay all right, you know, I’ll see you in a wee while about 15 minutes bye bye for now.
[100:47]
————
Millennial Woes has created many things. And this is your chance to own one of them! A unique piece of work hand crafted by the vile vlogger, to commemorate Millennial 2021.
Millenniyule 2021 commemoration
A hundred hours of highly skilled labour went into producing this animated vector graphic, which can be magnified to any size.
In the iconic Millennial Woes font, it glistens and responds to your touch. And at the centre of it all, a figure representative of 2021, the White Stag!
Symbolizing endurance, discovery, and rejuvenation!
This one-of-a-kind creation is up for sale as an NFT. Follow the link below. And it can be yours forever! This is your only chance!
[101:50]
END
[Readers: If you see any errors (however minor), or ways to improve things, in the transcript, please let me know in the Comment section.
Also please share the link to this transcript, so others can benefit. Thanks.]
============================================
ODYSEE COMMENTS
355 comments
[Guest comments in blue]
@millennialwoes
16 days ago
Pinned by @millennialwoes
Millenniyule is a lot of work. If you would like to give something back, here’s how you can support me:
https://millennialwoes.com/donate
https://millennialwoes.com/crypto
BTC: bc1qawkvztdv66cqc2y0c8l77r5evtmyqasckzmaa8
LIGHTNING BTC: LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7MRWW3UXYMM59E3K7MF0D3H82UNV9ACXZ7FLW4EK2UNFVS7NGDP4XYCRZA9E7YH
ETH: 0xA2A1b54eB817425f26e143271AeFE4191645ffdE
LTC: ltc1qjjhm67xg6gw72ufns2m42e6enkmpzg29kyh0hx
BCH: qzzefssk0v26f2t2un80npprd6fm6yqnmqwj39yad6
XMR: 45x4SAf1EaNDBYJ53ZhfcVM4VU2ojQwV1EgvwzAUQ7S7dGpCpeVpwgggZut7qfUMEuAXXbg3UvFTVcqwSzYVPDvh4h5rYZU
Less
Reply
15
1
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
Cat is displaying the absolute worst tendency of the cuckservative here.
A is a lost battle, we need to move on to B.
B is a lost battle, we need to move on to C.
C is a lost battle, …
Reply
87
6
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
As opposed to continuing to fight lost, past battles rather than current or future ones? How is it strategically a good idea to constantly be on the defensive and suffering a tactical lag rather than being pre-emptive and on the offense?
Reply
13
26
Hide replies
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
That’s not what you’re proposing though, is it? You’re just reacting to the latest development while proposing we abandon our ancestral homelands as a lost cause. We’re in a long fight and you’re preaching defeatism.
Mark my words: the covid hysteria will have fizzled out within 12 months and Schwab &co. won’t even have gotten 5% of what they wanted. It will have been useful in outing the fickle though, amongst other things.
Less
Reply
21
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Covid lockdowns will morph into climate lockdowns and vax passports will morph into movement permits. And either way, you will be under their total control. THAT is the issue. Agenda 21 is the longterm game. 2020 was a milestone year in that game and they got everything they wanted. You think that next year they are going to say, “I guess we’ve caused enough suffering, let’s give the plebs back their freedom”? Why would they do that? I guess we will see who is right. They’ve told you from day one that there will be a “new normal”.
Less
9
7
@LimerickickHaiku
20 days ago
reply
@philosophicat
Holy fuck is the right stuck in the stone age. You guys need to watch/read some Lamrey Milt and Jay Dyer to get out of this 2015 mindset.
0
4
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
Re: Covid lockdowns…
You’re describing the globalist sci-fi pipedream, not reality. Trust me, the TED-talk-ocalypse isn’t going to happen.
I’m not saying that we shouldn’t resist the covid tyranny, btw. I just don’t see what that has to do with giving up on our homelands or spreading defeatism, and I think that the panic on display among our elites will ultimately work in our favour.
Hold the line.
Less
Reply
15
1
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
And if you don’t prioritise resisting tyranny, there won’t BE a shire, Pippin.
3
5
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
Re: And if…
As I said elswhere under this video, I don’t have any objection to discussing immediate priorities. You repeatedly writing off our homelands as “lost battles” is what I was objecting to. (I also think you’re mistaking their fantasies for reality.)
Reply
16
@jnl
20 days ago
Even if “Covid tyranny” was defeated tomorrow, we’d be right back in the terrible position we were in before. This isn’t even a battle that gains us anything. I could think of a hundred more important issues.
Reply
13
@lancebiggums
20 days ago
you lose every battle when you admit defeat as soon as it gets hard
Reply
14
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
1
9
@Weltenesche
10 days ago
If you keep conceding to your enemy, you end up losing.
Conceding to the left is how the Republicans ended up being so utterly useless and cucked on every issue, and the same with almost every right-wing European party.
Reply
@TomPow
11 days ago
The problem with conservatives and the right is not recognizing that we’ve already completely lost and that in reality what we have to do is go on the offensive and gain ground. Not just the ground lost but far more than that. What the right needs is a vision of conquest.
Reply
1
@alan_B_stard_M_P
10 days ago
2 world wars was about us giving our countries up was it? What would our fathers and grandathers say after their sacrifices
Reply
4
0
Hide replies
@Weltenesche
10 days ago
They’d say “I fought for the wrong side.”
Reply
5
0
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
10 days ago
Yoi’re right
@ClownworldSquad
3 days ago
Yeah she is a perfect example why women shouldn’t be in leaderpositions or have a big presence on social media.
Reply
2
@samson.sawnoff
20 days ago
She’s completely wrong about the replacement issue – just look to France right now. It’s an issue that obviously has traction. The covid issue could go away tomorrow.
Reply
75
4
Hide replies
@samson.sawnoff
20 days ago
European history shows ethno-nationalism is a strong force that reasserts itself periodically.
Reply
31
1
@AaronKasparov
20 days ago
She is wrong about the replacement issue but the ‘covid issue’ isn’t going away, either. Both are important, it’s not an either/or situation.
Reply
14
0
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
The damn thing is that she’s prioritizing covid over demographics.
Reply
16
0
Hide replies
@AaronKasparov
20 days ago
Which doesn’t make sense because the replacement of Whites is part of The Great Reset and Agenda 21. The thing that woke me up to the demographic issue a few years ago was seeing Agenda 21’s “Replacement Migration” document (which I discovered through Red Ice). Both issues are part of the same beast.
1
@Milu_the_black_dog
19 days ago
Both Covid AND demographics are distractions…Literally….The one true topic which should matter the most to all of us is central banks..JEWISH central banks..which are literally funding everything we HATE (feminism, degeneracy, NGOs,bigpharma, politics, feds, etc)…And even if we magically recover both our freedom and borders, they would still have us grabbed by the balls..and they could easily create as many wars-depressions-collapses as they wanted (and as they did in the past)…Of course, we still need to win all battles, so of course we need to win the covid and demographics wars… but it will never end..unless you end their source of power..the central banks..
Less
Reply
11
1
Hide replies
@Bearcingetorix
13 days ago
Fuckin this!
3
@wrathofatlantis2018
20 days ago
Exactly. Furthermore, the demography is not lost in the East, even if the last chance that Zemmour represents does not succeed.
Reply
@TomPow
11 days ago
She is a woman. Women are more obsessed with cleanliness than being wise to foreign invaders.
Reply
@AaronKasparov
20 days ago
Demographics and The Great Reset are of equal importance. They’re not even separate issues: Part of The Great Reset IS to replace Whites: In The World Economic Forum’s 2040 promotional video, they say “We have to do a better job welcoming refugees”. That’s code for replacing Whites. So it’s not even a tenable position to say “Just worry about The Great Reset but not demographics” because both are part of The Great Reset and Agenda 21. Always was.
Less
Reply
56
1
Hide replies
@jnl
20 days ago
Ending the Covid stuff is just a means to an end. The end itself is a future for our people. That’s what we should all be ultimately fighting for. Because if we successfully defeated Covid tyranny but then went extinct afterwards, what would have been the point? It would have all been for nothing. Never lose focus on what really matters.
Reply
5
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
She said the imminent medical tyranny has to be defeated first, which is obviously true. Dissent would become impossible under the techocratic control grid that is intended to come in through the vaccine passport.
Reply
4
@Weltenesche
10 days ago
It’s the other way around. The Great Reset is a step towards replacing Whites, which is the end goal.
Reply
@alan_B_stard_M_P
20 days ago
tell her it’s Chrismas, not the holidays. This is more than left v right. the Covid demonstrations are ridiculous. This is a good time to complain about immigration. Covid is imported, and the only way to stop it is stopping immigration. Demonstrating against covid has no point unless they demonstrate against the cause, and the cause is free movement
The Tasmanian abos were NOT genocided. That’s old BS put forward by white anglo haters. It’s an old Canard that like other pieces is anti white BS, is never challenged as Aussies are too lazy to care
Less
Reply
51
1
Hide replies
@Frost
20 days ago
We all misspeak occasionally. Merry Christmas.
Reply
7
3
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
20 days ago
lol Merry Christmas to you too
Reply
2
1
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Some people celebrate Yule instead. And I am also including Thanksgiving and New Year’s into the holiday season. I wasn’t trying to be politically correct.
Reply
7
5
Hide replies
@Vingul
20 days ago
I think you would have gotten much less pushback if you had simply stated that the Covid agenda and white replacement are more or less just different aspects of one and the same issue. Which I believe they are.
Even if you do believe that the demographic issue is a lost cause in America and Western Europe (and I’m not implying that you are lying about that), why would you say that out loud? You’re “not trying to blackpill anyone”, yet you’re practically saying that there is no future. What could be more demoralising? For someone who cares about his people, that’s like saying the world will end. How will he then be motivated to fight against the Covid tyranny? I agree that we should at times focus our attention on more pressing matters, and I can get behind the idea of “one struggle” with non-Europeans vs. evil elites, but I would not bother with standing on any barricades with racial strangers if I truly believed that all Western European peoples are as good as dead. I might be fighting to the death (metaphorically or in fact) with my own, with my family and friends, not with outsiders. I am not trying to create a future for strangers in my own home, with me and all my kin in the grave and forgotten if not pissed on.
The above might not be the most charitable interpretation of what you said possible. I enjoy your channel and appearances on other streams (and on this one). But I would have expected you to deal more carefully with such a fundamental existential (spiritual) question as the survival of one’s race or ethnos.
Less
Reply
8
0
Hide replies
@jnl
20 days ago
Our countries have essentially been occupied since the end of WW2. Even if this Covid stuff were all to go away tomorrow, we wouldn’t be in a better position than we already were. “Covid tyranny” is just fake and gay distraction that has been extremely effective in pacifying our people from actually making progress. I’m so sick of these “Covid is the only issue” types. Covid doesn’t matter; it’s just one issue of many. The future of our people is what matters.
Less
8
@Monkeymakefire
2 days ago
what does that have to do with holidays?
0
0
Hide replies
@Vingul
1 day ago
What does your comment have to do with mine?
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Monkeymakefire
23 hours ago
about as much as yours has to do with the cat’s…
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Vingul
23 hours ago
It had everything to do with the video. A comment would be a way of reaching her. I have since communicated with her somewhere else, so don’t worry about it.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Monkeymakefire
19 hours ago
oh, thank god. i was really beginning to fret…
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Vingul
11 hours ago
; – )
Reply
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
Are listening to what Vingful is saying cat, or are you going to ignore it?
Reply
2
1
@alan_B_stard_M_P
20 days ago
Hi Fair enough
Reply
1
@alan_B_stard_M_P
19 days ago
You fall right into the hands of the usual suspects. It is about Christmas, most of the world does not celebrate thanksgiving. It’s named after the day, not a series of days. Yule is fine by me, but this ” happy holiday crap comes from here
https://townhall.com/columnists/burtprelutsky/2006/12/11/the-jewish-grinch-who-stole-christmas-n997077
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
I’ll say what I want for whatever reasons I feel like. I think I know more about what my intentions are than you do.
1
2
@Bukitburg
19 days ago
It is Yule not Christmas to many native Europeans. Saying holidays keeps it neutral between Pagans/Atheists and Christians.
Reply
1
0
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
19 days ago
Christmas is th recofnized day world wide
Reply
0
1
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
The demonstrations are against medical tyranny, not against a virus you absolute twit.
Reply
4
0
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
18 days ago
ad I an saying they are wasting an opportunity to stop the virus. 34 upvotes can’t be wrong, you absolute twit
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
You can’t stop these kinds of viruses unless you shut down all travel forever. The idea that you would do that in response to the coof is laughable. This talking point maybe kind of made sense in early 2020, but not now.
The issue now is stopping the vaccine passport system. Do you want the system telling you what you have to inject in order to take part in society? The elites believe in depopulation, and their first target is the West.
Less
0
0
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
18 days ago
it would shut down travel from some places, yes, but not others who have cleared the virus and who have also stopped immigration. Western nations did not have much immigration until the 60s, certainly not from the third world
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
Did you take the vax?
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
18 days ago
yes as i’m not taking any more
Reply
0
0
Show reply
@NoFunZone
6 days ago
is she pagan? is that why she said that?
Reply
@lordbeermonster
20 days ago
I can see now why people voted this down. We should accept and come to terms with our demographic replacement, because it’s now irreversible, and we should pray more, and perhaps spend time investigating astrology? Seriously?
Reply
50
1
Hide replies
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
Discussing immediate priorities is one thing, but writing off the theft of our lands as a “lost battle” is another.
Reply
27
1
@Nebulaaa
20 days ago
She’s a proudly childless cat lady. Glad she’s on our side but she’s an example of why spiritual but not religious beliefs don’t inspire people to have children. it would cut too much into their philosophizing time
Reply
21
1
Hide replies
@ragnawie
20 days ago
It seems she essentially advocates for the restless searching of a spirituality or religion that feels “right.” Just because she focuses more on the substance rather than the surface doesn’t mean she doesn’t advocate the same discontent obsession of theory that plagues us all.
Reply
9
@philosophicat
20 days ago
This simply isn’t true. I don’t normally discuss my private life because it’s private and has nothing to do with my content, but because this is something people bring up every year in an attempt to dismiss what I am saying, I will briefly put this to rest. I’ve been trying for a baby for a very long time. If it happens, I would be very happy, but it’s ultimately up to God and not me. Perhaps God has other plans for me. I simply seek to live in alignment with God’s will and I would welcome any prayers for equanimity in this regard.
Less
Reply
15
2
Hide replies
@georgie173148
20 days ago
bless you Cat, let’s hope 2022 is your year, literally tears in my eyes
3
1
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
Cat, be realistic here. I’ve heard this same argument over “allying” many times with other issues such as LGBT with MUSLIMS. Just because something effects many groups, does not mean nor is there enough solid and very strong evidence to suggest that simply 1 issue will somehow be enough to have a strange multi-racial partnership. Hell Cat, it’s still going on right now. Ethnic White British Girls are still being trafficked in the UK by Muslims and those communities still protect those men. The same goes for Blacks, Hispanics, etc. There’s still interracial conflicts despite all of the covid nonsense. You want to talk strategy, yet you’re overly idealistic simply because of 1 issue alone, and without much to back your own argument other than calling it “strategic”. These other groups still hate White People cat. Just because covid started up does not mean they themselves have stopped their attacks on Whites.
Less
10
1
@Nebulaaa
20 days ago
you need to eat meat cat
4
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I do.
Reply
3
2
@NativeAlbion
20 days ago
While I disagree with you, you are in my players. God bless.
4
@Foxer
14 days ago
Sorry for your troubles with having children. It’s a terrible thing to be childless when wanting them. But giving in to “god” is a worthless coping mech. Why try anything, if god wants you to have children you will have even if you are celebate.
Do what you can yourself, no prayers will work because you dont even know which one of the thousands of gods people have been worshiping to turn to.
cant on natural ways? DO IVF. if it fails do it again and again. If that fails try surrogate. If that fails try adoption(if that is acceptable). Dont wait for miracles that never comes. Nothing good comes to thoes that just wait. Best wishes and never give up untill the last straw has been grasped.
Less
@LimerickickHaiku
20 days ago
The only side women are on is where their vagainas lean.
Reply
4
2
@EscapingZek
19 days ago
its something. probably the best single thing. not exclusive.
Reply
@SpiritualDiscussion
18 days ago
Without blood you will perish.
This is a law that comes from outside.
If you lose your family you are finished.
Reply
2
@ClownworldSquad
3 days ago
This girl is def not someone to listen to, let me tell you.
Reply
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I appreciate everyone who tuned in and contributed to a lively chat and I hope everyone had fun, even if you didn’t love what I had to say.
You can find my videos on both YouTube and Odysee.
https://www.youtube.com/c/philosophicat
For those wanting a better understanding of the race/spirit thing, I recommend in particular Episodes 7 and 10 from my Revolt Against the Modern World series.
Less
Reply
40
14
Hide replies
@blut-and-biden
20 days ago
Did you show your face in previous Millenniyules? Seems like this is the first time, but then again my memory is terrible
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Yes I did and I will be re-airing my previous MillenniYule appearances on my channel this Wednesday and next.
Reply
6
@Alternative_Voices_Portal
20 days ago
Thanks for appearing and for sharing your links, Cat!
And, try to not let the various morons and subversives get you down by talking gibberish about you and your positions.
The average commenter does not represent the average viewer (or person in general).
Reply
8
7
Hide replies
@LimerickickHaiku
19 days ago
The dissident right has literally become that Spider Man meme where they’re all pointing fingers at each other. Yeah, I definitely have a lot of faith in you guys to do anything about this totalitarian takeover and extermination of the world. I’m actually laughing now.
Reply
4
2
@Vingul
19 days ago
Did you change your name (and avatar) to alan_B_stard_M_P, Philosophicat? Lmao. If not that’s a pretty funny bug.
Reply
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
What you said was very clear: the imminent medical tyranny has to be defeated first. Dissent would become impossible under the techocratic control grid that is intended to come in through the vaccine passport.
I despair at the IQ level of a movement that somehow failed to grasp what you clarified over and over again in this stream.
Reply
4
1
@frenologist
13 days ago
I think what you were saying was pretty based tbh and I always appreciate a good contrarian take. It’s OK if a few jimmies get rustled every now and then.
Reply
2
@GrandPaLampshade
20 days ago
Without Death we cannot have life, without hate we cannot have Love, Without War, we cannot have Victory. Stand Sons and Daughters of Europe you all have the blood of Hero’s and Warriors flowing thru you. We will have Victory if you stand.
Reply
33
@TheThinRedLine
20 days ago
Even america is not lost, R E C O N Q U I S T A
Reply
30
0
Hide replies
@ST-TV
19 days ago
How?
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
The optimistic version: things becomes so bad from for example the inflation and the covid restrictions that a majority of the whites and a a group of the colored peoples demand drastic solutions and this gives rice to a real Nationalist government.
The pessimistic version : America continues the decline and at some point this gives rise to secession movements and America breaks up in several states some of these white from these white state begins a slow pushing back of the colored people much like what happened in Spain , where the White people were pushed back in to a few mountain areas and from there began reconquista around AD 750 and finally ended with the fall of Granada in 1492
Less
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
“things becomes so bad from for example the inflation and the covid restrictions that a majority of the whites and a a group of the colored peoples demand drastic solutions and this gives rice to a real Nationalist government.” This is a FATAL (and i mean it literally) flaw in the thinking of most nationalists. This narrative puts you and the entire movement into a state of permanent hybernation. There is not point to to anything untill things get so bad that people are craving for the “next one” to save them. That is not how power works. If this narrative of collapse causing nationalists to raise up would even remotely be true then South Africa would have been in a civil war for the last 10+ years. They are not. Why? Because when people face adversity, over 90% of then just make individual solutions to avoid (note avoid, not even try to get rid off) said adversity. Thus people will just move or flee rather than fight. So you think you are waiting for a savior, yet in reality you are only waiting for exintinction.
“America continues the decline and at some point this gives rise to secession movements and America breaks up in several states” Another FATAL flaw in your thinking. Things like this do not happen, nothing like this has EVER happened. It is on YOU (yes YOU!!!!) to gather people who want to MAKE this happen. Once you have those people, you NEEEEEEEEED to form organizations, parties and institutions TO MAKE said thing happen. This is crucial, yet none of you is wiling to even talk about anything like that, let alone start forming ANY of these entities. You are done.
Less
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
First of all , I am not sure the comparison with South Africa is very good remember the whites in South Africa are less than 10 % .
On the latter part we largely agree we should organize, form communities and become active and push our agendas, that being said every thing has it’s momment and we should prepare and help to create that mommment.
Where we might disagree (I am not sure ) is that : we can not give up on White homelands for our people and sell this ideal in order to form an alliance with conservative colored people in order to form a multi racial conservative country.
What we can and should do is to form a contemperary alliance of the willling (colored, lefties ltbq etc) in order to fight the new tyranny rising from the Covid and the great reset since we all have an interest in that, but it should be a contemporary alliance with out ever loosing sight of our long term goals
Less
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
At their high europeans were more than 40% of South Africans so yes, it’s totally valid comparable. If you beleave in your reconquista, then you should also consider that there likely were more Christians in Spain (compared to the Moors) back then than there are europeans in South Africa right now. My point is, even when people see their kin being driven to extinction, they will not take action. They will just die. Without insitutions, organisations and parties to USE, GUIDE and HARNESS said people, they are completely useless. Back then you had the Monarchy and the Church, together with those 2, you could make people do and beleave what ever you wanted. Contrast that to what we have now…. We have nothing. We don’t have media (and the ones we do have can’t agree on a narrative and fight with each other more than they do with our enemies) that can tell our people what to do and why to do it. We don’t have positive religious institutions to harness the dissatisfaction of the people. And we certainly don’t have parties or organizations that can do anything for us.
“we can not give up on White homelands” Thoughts like this are at the moment completely irrelevant. It does not matter if you beleave in separatism, imperialism, nationalism, nationalsocialism, transhumanism etc… All of that is completely irrelevant when you don’t even have a clue on the means to move people. I beleave you use a frace “putting the cart in front of a horse”. That is what you are doing. You need to focus on forming those ESSENTIAL entities first, before you can even entertain future scenarios. Organizations, institutions and parties of our people, for our people and ONLY for our people. Time to form those has been for the past 50+ years, you have at least that much to catch up so why are you still just sitting there? We have a million dreamers, 0 doers. How about next time you DO something before you speak?
Less
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
The whites in SA were 40 % around 1920 at the time apartheid ended they were maybe 10- 12 % so no
We do have something we have truth and the natural order and the deep tribal instincts, and they need a huge system of media academia and sencorship and law etc to keep and even with such overwelming power and force they have not been able to stop our ideas from spreading to such a degree that words like anti white and the great replacement slowly is becomming main stream. Maybe the reason why everything is speeding up is that they fear they are quite close to loosing it all.(I have seen Soros saying that several times )
I have been to 15 -20 anti lockdown protests so I am doing something and on a personal level I am trying to become more financially independent of the system
Less
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
I see you still do not get it. There is no hope for you.
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
I am sorry
I think the proof is in the pudding
People elected Trump, people voted for Brexit this clearly show that millions agree with us at least to some degree
If you just want a conservative traditionalist society why not move to an Islamic country or maybe a part of India or Africa isn’t that much easier ?
Less
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
If you think Trump or Brexit moved the situation in our favor in any way, you truelly are lost.
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
I respect you Cat , you are a clever woman but I disagree.
I diddn’t say that Brexit or Trump helped as a lot all though I do think it helped us a little, but to be honest both were a disappointment
Nevertheless both show that the majority of the population at least to some degree agrees with us, which also our enemies realized which is the reason for their hysterical reaction to both and also why they have been speeding up their agenda
Less
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
Lol you must be drunk. Go look at my channel. Do i look like a cat to you?
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
I am sorry , I thought I had a discussion with philosophicat your name kind of implied that
My arguement remains the same though
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
Your argument has 0 value and you don’t even realise it. Thus you are hopeless.
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
that is not really an answer, more like a childish refussal of an arguement
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
It is an answer, but you are just too think to get it. Go back to my previous answers and read them again, then perhaps you’ll get it.
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
I hope you will get a long and happy life in Afghanistan among your fellow conservatives
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
Have fun becoming extinct.
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@TheThinRedLine
18 days ago
With your politics we will last far longer than you since your kids will be married of to very nice conservative Africans
Reply
1
1
@ZR
20 days ago
I think most of us can agree the COVID tyranny is currently the priority for the DR, but Philosophicat is going further than that and saying the demographic battle is lost and we should move on which of course is not going to be a popular position.
Reply
26
0
Hide replies
@ragnawie
20 days ago
Yeah, demographics is a social issue just as wide as Covid is. I think the core frustration with the demographic issue is white Westerners being told that they exist to be imposed upon. It’s like being on a sinking ship and being told you aren’t allowed to fix the leak. So, in addition to being told to suppress the human desire for boundaries between each other, we are being herded into a technocratic medical state.
Less
Reply
7
@SpiritualDiscussion
18 days ago
Unfortunately that is not possible.
The laws of blood come from outside and are not something you can change.
The idea that you can change the laws of existence is the problem.
Reply
1
@Wm
19 days ago
Truth is, if we had no Jews, all of these problems would just go away.
Reply
27
2
Hide replies
@alan_B_stard_M_P
19 days ago
exactly
Reply
3
@goolog
11 days ago
the jews are not the only ones to blame you sound like a jogger blaming white people for his low IQ…
Reply
0
2
@Weltenesche
10 days ago
No, they wouldn’t.
We might have been able to fix them if it weren’t for Jews, though.
But they certainly wouldn’t magically go away, not the way things are now.
Reply
0
2
@ProblematicBob
20 days ago
Lostbattlecat
Reply
25
3
Hide replies
@3xchann
19 days ago
Dissapointed, so her goals are now preventing us from sliding into the ‘metaverse’ ? She clearly doesn’t belong in the dissident right.
Reply
7
1
Hide replies
@dakotajoe
19 days ago
I live in the US and the Metaverse will ilkely be preferable to living in most cities here, lol
Reply
3
1
@GB22
19 days ago
She has a point. The demographics issue is not going to be won while we are all locked-down and all social interactions have moved to the metaverse.
Reply
2
3
Hide replies
@Asha
4 days ago
She’s more than capable of making that argument without referring to the Replacement as a “petty demographic squabble” – the fact that she openly used such language is very suspect.
2
@UnsentPassenger
16 days ago
Wew. Comment section on this one was brutal.
Reply
2
@LimerickickHaiku
20 days ago
Good luck to Philosophicat in her attempts to unite this ragtag group of warring tribes. Everyone who’s tried to reach out or find common ground has failed. TFM fended off multiple assaults from various right wing groups, and ‘House of Comments’ and Asha Logos are currently neck deep in their own attempts but seem to be failing as well. I will say, though, that commenter who questioned whites needing minority groups to dominate was proven wrong many decades ago. The left got to where they are today by using minority groups. The right would rather die in their chosen ghetto than even make the effort to dream of a future for themselves.
Arrogance, lulz, mental illness, and a third world attitude has all but sealed the fate of ‘the right’ into oblivion. I’ve seen incels band together better than dissident rightists.
Less
Reply
24
6
Hide replies
@M3t4phYzX
20 days ago
Brilliantly put.
Reply
5
1
Hide replies
@phantom_reborn
20 days ago
yep… fortunately the live chat that accompanied the stream is not reproduced here… but it did seem as though the average age of the contributors was around 11. Most wouldn’t even pass the Turing test. Perhaps lots of them have simply sunk deep into mental illness during lockdown.
Reply
3
@Milu_the_black_dog
20 days ago
While I admire their efforts, I think the fact someone thinks we can unite dissident groups is, by default, naive thinking…Just do a quick review and you will realize that we are divided by so many unsolvable problems: the jew question, the women question, the race question, the religion question, etc…And while someone may say that the current powers (globohomo) are using this exact strategy (opposed minorities vs whites) against us…the only reason why these types of unstable alliances have reached success in last history (like with the bolsheviks), is because they are literally backed up with endless money suppy by the true rulers of this world (jewish bankers), who will gladly throw them into the bus, when a better cattle material arrives (spics, chinks, shitskins, etc).. Now, I personally suspect that a better approach would literally be divide the country into thousands of different states (one for each dominnant ideology)…and let them fight/live until the one who is the best (in evolutionary terms) wins (which is likely gonna be us)…That way, we don’t have to carry all the dead weight from the useless garbage we have in our societies AND we wouldn’t be constantly fighting within ourselves (because all the people who disagree with us are living somewhere else)..But there are too many people in our ranks who still to this day think we can win everything back (our lands, our money, our demographics, etc) and many who have completely swallowed the blackpill.. So I doubt they are gonna change their minds..
Less
Reply
2
0
Hide replies
@LimerickickHaiku
20 days ago
Interesting how you said “us” yet also claimed we can’t combine into the same group.
What’s often been suggested by some, TFM most notably coming to mind, is that the biggest threat to our existences must be dealt with first, and then petty squabbles be dealt with afterwards. I’ve also been advocating for peaceful separation for years, but the powers at be want extermination and unheard of levels of power.
Something no one gets is that you don’t need to share the same Zodiac sign to hold the door open for someone. Until the right gets that hammered into its thick skull nothing will change.
Less
Reply
2
0
Hide replies
@Milu_the_black_dog
20 days ago
I said “us”, because I didn’t want to start naming the endless groups which compose the dissident right (I can name 6-7, but I’m sure there are dozens more)..Now…I completely agree that peaceful separation is indeed the best solution…In fact, I hoped brexit would be an example that countries can still dissolute from their controllers (the EU) …and I hoped that Texas would be next after the US elections…But I was too naive…Our rulers have their people in every corner of the world..and of course, every government-corporation in existance….And the fact that most people (even within the dissident right) still to this day don’t notice the obvious zionists links of Johnson and Trump (and Bolsonaro, whom people still names as based) tells me that most people will keep playing the democracy game for a while, before realizing the whole system was rigged from the start…..But let’s give a try to your proposal, why not?..So, if we remove the normies, bluepilled, leftiests, and the usual agents of the globohomo, we should have what we call the dissident right…..Now, what are the worst threats to our existance? I will name the ones I believe should be prioritized: Jewish Bankers; Jews in general; Ethnocentrism; Religion; Economics; Politics; Foreign races; Demographics and finally Covid…Many people would say that Covid, demographics or even the jews should be first in our lists, but I say that all of them are just distractions…If you don’t handle the jewish bankers and their central banks first, they will create endless distractions more, as they have done for thousand years…Would you agree with that list?….Finally..yeah, I don’t hate people who disagree with me…I would hold the door even to fucking Bill Gates…But that doesn’t mean I want to talk with him or make him change his mind…
Less
1
@Fascist-Freddy
20 days ago
Why are you listening to TFM. First, he’s a degenerate. Second, he refuses to accept the Jew Problem.
0
2
@LimerickickHaiku
20 days ago
@Fascist-Freddy
He’s one of the only guys who understand the WQ. Have to pick and choose what you listen to. The right is barely based.
1
1
@J_Kyu
19 days ago
im ashamed to admit i dont know who TFM
1
@LimerickickHaiku
19 days ago
reply
@J_Kyu
Find him here:
@TurdFlingingMonkey
@J_Kyu
20 days ago
answer the jay kyoo and everything else will fall into place
Reply
1
2
Hide replies
@Milu_the_black_dog
19 days ago
I’m not sure if you are being sarcastic or not…but if you don’t take the Rotschilds and their closest allies (the Rockefellers, the Morgans, etc) first…you will make no progress…The Rotschilds have thousands of years of experience infiltrating and destroying empires..Even if you take everything from them, they can easily recover their fortunes and try again to take the world, in a few hundreds of years…But if they are down…the remaining jews can be easily handled..
Less
2
@ragnawie
19 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
0
5
Hide replies
@LimerickickHaiku
19 days ago
Ironic. I feel the same way about the core of the Alt Right.
Also, fun fact: being anonymous and online are actually positives, not negatives. Back in my day we actually got shit done and created interesting, cohesive, and, dare I say, fun groups in this digital realm. Your workplace where you’re under attack no matter what you do? Or local woke church flying the LGBT flag? Not so much. Stop making excuses for your shit behavior. I think this is the year I dissasociate from “the right” completely. You guys are just a bunch of toxic grifters.
Less
Reply
1
0
Hide replies
@ragnawie
19 days ago
My points about being online still stand with regard to uniting disparate groups. The majority of people in these groups join to revel in being part of a group that expects nothing from them; no responsibility, no need for support, and can slink away at the slightest inconvenience or dispute and join another group. The majority of these online associations are incredibly tenuous and oftentimes done out of pure negativity. Expecting anything outside the cores of these various groups to care about reconciliation is just naive. The online sphere encourages neuroticism, flakiness, and endless subdivision and the fact that the dissident right is confined to it condemns it to those things.
Less
@LimerickickHaiku
19 days ago
reply
@ragnawie
And my point about the IRL world still stands. If you can’t find it here you’re definitely not going to find it out there. The internet, for all its faults, and it has many, is the one place you have a hope of meeting like-minded people and being open and honest without as much risk. The key problem here is not the internet, or the physical world, but the fact people, as a general rule, are quintessentially selfish and primed to get what they need where they can get it and as soon as possible.
Contrary to the copium of the right, Christianity is dead, save for a few small hick towns, and those places are ravaged with deaths of despair and white trash. Wokism is the only unifying faith we’ve got right now. To take your stance, and I don’t entirely disagree with it, is to admit defeat, and that this is nothing but a LARP because no one here has anything else going for their lives. And once again, I can’t disagree. See you in the wasteland.
Less
@alan_B_stard_M_P
19 days ago
if someone offers the right reasons and not BS they will unite. It’s not about the right alone, or shouldn’t be
Reply
2
0
Hide replies
@LimerickickHaiku
19 days ago
The right disagrees internally as much as the collective ‘right’ disagrees with the collective ‘left.’ A monarchist, libertarian, alt righter, Christian, and pagan have almost nothing in common. The left found a way to unite a vast group of groups. The right is proud to be disagreeable and single-minded.
Reply
1
1
@Nebulaaa
20 days ago
Spiritual but not religious blah blah blah. where are your babies cat?
Reply
23
8
@MelGibsmedat
19 days ago
This is why women have traditionally never been protectors and preservers of civilzation. Really bad stream tbh.
Reply
22
6
@deadribbits
18 days ago
Why can’t I care about demographics and covid tyranny?
Reply
21
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
18 days ago
You can and should. It’s just a matter of prioritising.
Reply
5
4
@DharmaNationalist
20 days ago
I did like MW’s way of describing the “religious impulse” inherent in humanity as something “beautiful” and juxtaposing that against the decrepid world view of people like Ricky Gervais and Richard Dawkins, being egotistical, manical idiots.
Reply
21
1
Hide replies
@Foxer
14 days ago
Depends on how much blood must be spilled and suffering that must be endured in the name of religious impulses. Most people would not want to live in the dark ages when religion ruled everything and suffering was something not to be remedied.
Reply
@jimbojones15757
19 days ago
“I’m not religious I’m spiritual”
“Just give up on the demographic issue whitey, what really matters is masks”
“Nazism is disgusting and no sane person could ever support it”
This woman is Charlie Kirk tier… How the hell is she apart of DR again?
Reply
20
3
@joker916
19 days ago
Demographic replacement and COVID tyranny are NOT mutually exclusive. Both serve the same end: White Genocide.
Reply
19
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
Precisely.
Reply
2
0
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
19 days ago
“Demographics are done! Just huddle up on some isolated island and “survive” – backstabber cat
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@ST-TV
19 days ago
And what are YOU going to do instead?
0
2
@JacobJ4746
18 days ago
Well I’m not going to tell everyone to essentially to give up and just let the west fall, which you ST-TV, seem to be way on board with Cat on this.
1
@3xchann
19 days ago
Say what you want about Nick Fuentes but he’s right about women.
Reply
19
8
Hide replies
@jimbojones15757
19 days ago
I think Fuentes is cringe about women. But its hard to argue that he’s wrong when you watch interviews like this
Reply
9
1
Hide replies
@3xchann
19 days ago
Yeah that’s exactly what I was hinting at. She is such a defeatist, like we care for a metaverse over the well being of our people ? If whites go extinct I want the world go to shit. Why help non-whites so they have a future while we don’t. It doesn’t make sense.
Reply
12
@jnl
20 days ago
I love Cat’s music, she has an incredible voice, and she has done a lot for our people. But she’s entirely wrong that the most important issue is Covid and everything else should be put on the sideline. The most important issue is, was, and always will be, the future and wellbeing of our people. Covid stuff is just one tiny issue along the way.
Reply
18
3
Hide replies
@Vesper
20 days ago
The future of our people is the most important issue and always will be but Covid is not a tiny issue at all. Most people are very clearly willing to do whatever the government says so there is no reason for them to stop this.
Reply
5
1
@philosophicat
19 days ago
If you want to ensure white people survive, then you need to ensure they don’t get jabbed. If you want to ensure white culture survives, you need to resist the NWO.
Reply
4
2
@t34p4rty
19 days ago
If you lose the covid vax pass battle its game over, there will be no race, white or otherwise. To argue otherwise is just midwit
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@jnl
19 days ago
Where are you getting the idea from that the covid vax will eradicate the human species? Seriosuly, where?
Reply
3
0
Hide replies
@antientropy901
15 days ago
He didn’t say it “will eradicate the human species.”
0
1
@motardpdx
19 days ago
Women should not be elevated in the nationalist movement on platforms catering to white men, incels, simps, MGTOW, etc. Women express their sexuality without prudence, this mechanism of control is used as a distraction away from the ideological truth we all hold so dear to us, especially during this time of year during Millenniyule.
Reply
17
3
@ShlomoFinkelshnoz
19 days ago
Men want to fix the racial foundations of our civilization for the next 1000 years. Women want to complain to the manager about the most recent inconvenience. When Covid ends they’ll just distract you with something else sweetheart.
Reply
15
6
Hide replies
@Karl_Taranis
17 days ago
She’s saying that covid will lead to vax passports and digital IDs. Once these are implemented to everyone, we’ve lost all of our freedoms and forget about being a dissident and fighting for your people – you’ll be in the gulag with you family or dead. This is final battle in the war, and we can’t lose.
Reply
5
0
Hide replies
@Beavis-N-Butthurt
1 hour ago
Where is your evidence that this will happen ?
Reply
@Tyler
20 days ago
There is a differance between being willing to work with other groups and proclaming demographics a lost cause; one is pragmatic and the other is defeatist.
Reply
14
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
0
5
@reconzfury
20 days ago
ill tell you I love that you have Phiosophicat every year. To her credit shes not as feminist and behind as she once was. But she is still always behind on things that matter. Her argument through this whole video is “Give up ground, with good optics”. Its interesting that these type of conservatives (because thats essentially all she is) dont ever seem to think that the Covid issue wasnt used because of the postive effect we were having in the pro white sphere against the system. By introducing this global issue it makes many dissidents move backeards to thwre lolbertarian priors instead of continuing to fight where we are having an impact. This is another example of conservatives giving up ground bexause it doesnt “look good”.
Less
Reply
14
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
1
5
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
Then you’re a defeatist Cat. You’re alone in your own ideas, mostly. You’re better off signing up to be a Republican than you are being in dissident circles.
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I’ma defeatist for pointing out the reality that white birth rates are a minority in white countries and that 80%+ of white people stupidly got vaccinated? Okay, then.
2
2
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
Yes, you are Cat. You’re pretty much admitting it with that stupid comment of yours
1
2
@reconzfury
20 days ago
Its always nice that you respond to comments I appreciate you doing that this isnt the first one of my comments you have responded to though I was under different names before. My opinion of you will always be in all honesty that you are great with music and your takes on astrology are great. When it comes to this stuff after 15 plus years of you being active yes I would say that your takes on things really always seem to be behind. Your take on this show in particular this year is indistiguishable from american conservatives.
This case you were essientially making is that we should like not kick black people out of our anti covid rallies? ….as if that is even an issue to begin with? Like thats the new issue we need to focus on not white replacement? To me is very silly. I dont see any blacks and jews going out of there way to unite with white people to stand up against this “covid tyranny” yet once again it has to be white people who let there gaurd down for the betterment of other people right?
And dont get me wrong im all for strategic retreat its just I have to ask what world are you living in in the last few years where we havent been gaining ground especially in america for pro white activism? I mean are we living in 2 diffrent circles? we must be. Yours is conservative and mine is third postionist because as far as I can see we are having more of an impact then any anti covid activism especially in american to date. Is it because the GOP is lame now that you percieve it as a hopless cause? Myabe it has to do with the FinkleThink fake Nationalist leaders all over europe that have accomplished nothing for conservatives? Im not really sure where you have been the last few years if you see it all as so negative for white unity.
Less
Reply
3
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I have seen plenty of people of many different races at rallies. Why would I want to kick them out? That’s ridiculous.
As for America, I’ve barely lived there in my adult life and I’m not overly invested in what happens there, but from what I can see, pro-white activism hasn’t gained much ground at all and has been pretty stagnant for decades.
1
3
@reconzfury
20 days ago
@philosophicat
I think you missed the point I was making sorry for all the typos I tried to fix them. What I was saying was the postion you seem to be taking during the show is we need to focus on working with non whites to stop “covid tyranny” essentially by…? making sure not to kick them out of our majority white covid rallies lol ? umm… instead of continuing to gain ground in pro white community building and causes? On its face it just sounds very very funny because that as far as I can tell isnt even an issue that needs to be brought up. Seems totslly irrelivant. People can come and go to Covid rallies just fine regardless of who or what race. White people are still under attack explicitly though that hasnt stopped. As for pro white activism in america I mean your totally way off on that its never been better seems the same way in europe to. Thats why I just dont even understand how you have this perception that things arent going anywhere like Im seeing the total opposite from my view.
I would also really like you to consider as I originally stated that the system is using covid authoritarianism as such an obvious over step that it makes people give up the real fight of racial survival and instead focus on big tent libertarian stuff. I think that makes way more sense as to the reasons they are going so hard on this in white countries in particular. They want you to foght on big tent grounds because pro white grounds were becoming to effective.
My other point would be part of your problem is Evola lol and im a little confused because on one hand your like big brain evola gang and then you become an empiricist all of a sudden and are like emotions suck you need facts? I mean first off Evola was a nerd who did essentially nothing besides inspire men of action to actuslly do something and when he purity spiralled to much they essentially sidelined him because intellectuals never do anything but sperg all day and thats not productive at all.
Less
2
@blueyye
20 days ago
50
This ended up being much more than a casual discussion about the years events. A lot of us have taken Philosophicat’s position that covid tyranny should be issue #1 (Wayoftheworld, Morgoth, Dave Cullen, etc), but I think she gave the best defense of it that I’ve heard yet. I’m not going to stop trying to red-pill anyone in my vacinity when an anti-white commercial comes on the TV, but she’s certainly changed my opionion somewhat on this issue.
Less
Reply
12
11
Hide replies
@blueyye
20 days ago
Western Europe can absolutely still maintain their demographic majority.
Reply
12
@PoxPopuli
20 days ago
It doesn’t have to be either/or. All people like Cat are saying is that we need to form a united front against this Great Reset/Covid restrictions, and not simply ignore it or downplay it. Immigration and the great replacement are still important.
Reply
4
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I still point out these things, too. But tbh, what I’ve found is that it’s a lot easier to red-pill someone on Covid than it is to red-pill them on just about any other pet issue of the right. If you can red-pill someone on Covid, you have a greater chance of later successfully bringing up those other issues. But if you poison the well with your “racism” first, they won’t listen to you about anything.
Reply
6
2
@MrQuestion
20 days ago
She’s right and I’ve said the same for a while now. Demographic change was obviously never the ultimate end of the elite. They want total control, and the Great Reset is their big push.
Reply
11
19
Hide replies
@jnl
20 days ago
They’ve already had total control since the end of WW2 you moron.
Reply
15
3
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
You’re completely naive if you think what we’ve lived under the last several decades was ‘absolute control’. Frankly I don’t even know how to respond to this level of stupidity.
Reply
0
2
Hide replies
@jnl
18 days ago
Societal control under the illusions of “Capitalism” and “Democracy” and “Freedom” are infinitely more effective than whatever delusional fears of Communism you have.
5
@Alternative_Voices_Portal
20 days ago
Antiwhitism (including instinctive antiwhite hate) is a real thing.
The evil can’t help but want to destroy what inspires envy and a sense of inferiority in themselves.
Besides that, the oligarchs know from history that Westernkind has its breaking point when it comes to tyranny. So we’re quite an obstacle for their lust for total control.
Less
Reply
5
[Removed]
18 days ago
Philosophicat hold to the views
of her LORD – Evola – who thought of Race as the left think of Gender, interchangeable basically. Why are people suprised then that Philosophicat holds the same views
, driving her to say “The war on demographics is lost” – she never had a dog in that fight in the first place. A Typical WOMAN, specifically like the white blondes who pair up with Negro’s and later wonder where their life went wrong.
Less
Reply
10
5
Hide replies
@Arcessitor
4 days ago
Bruh, this is some schizoposting.
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@Tigerider
2 days ago
And yet you can’t say its not true. She lives in a third world country now and has no children, for her the war is over.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Arcessitor
1 day ago
I can’t say true or untrue, because it’s schizoposting. Whatever is right or wrong about it is completely incomprehensible, as there is no semblance of normal, logical thought in there. It’s a completely chaotic mess full of non sequiturs. If you read that and you got any sort of message or narrative out of there, then kudos to you, but also, you probably need meds.
@Tigerider
8 hours ago
Its not schizo, you only need to understand Evola’s view on race to understand what was said.
Evola thought of race as based in the spirit and soul, therefore according to him, you could have a black with a white soul and a white with a chinese soul, etc. Therefore race does not matter in the material and can be changable as determined by action (spirit). Philosophicats entire outlook and channel is based on Evolas views
, no doubt she thinks the same as him on race as well – which is why she can so easily abandon demographics as an issue. She never believed in demographics as per Evola’s views
. The last bit about negro’s and blondes is probably about an example as to the poor judgement of women.
Less
Reply
@woodsmith
19 days ago
in both the battle for our race and the battle for freedom and bodily sovereignty, we are pitted against largely the same forces. I believe there is no benefit to think of them as separate battles – the enemy you fight in one is the enemy you fight in the other. that is, our opponent is the body of the beast, the beast itself; not necessarily its limbs or tools it wields.
Reply
1
@JonathanBowden
20 days ago
Oh, God, her laugh is horrendous.
Reply
9
4
Hide replies
@ChainReaction
1 day ago
*shmuckle
Reply
@CaesarAvg
20 days ago
I saw the ‘pro-Covax’ and ‘anti-Covax’ arguments play out on the DR earlier, but they seem to me to be decreasing over time as even the more ‘pro-Covax’ content creators like Keith Woods have began to erase that part of their history and/or stop commenting about it or, as in Morgoth’s case, effectively switch sides. There is an emerging consensus on the DR that the media narrative on Covid is to some varying degree false.
I don’t believe that Covid vs. demographic replacement as the chief issue will become a serious division in the DR. It likely is already abating, with the ‘pro-Covax’ crowd now in a clear minority. One could make this same argument but consider instead how it affects the predominant Left-liberal ideology instead of us. Pre-Covid, they had a dilemma between considering climate change or systemic racism as their primary issue. Covid has now entered, making this choice a trilemma. And yet it hasn’t divided them nor slowed down their momentum in any way. There are no splits on the Left between Covid alarmists, climate alarmists and ‘anti-racists’ in the way that there were clear divisions between pro-EU or anti-EU Leftists.
Our movement has greater problems with microcosms of the world’s religious and economic problems being played out within. Christians against pagans against atheists. Or nationalist capitalists against nationalist socialists against NazBols. Or, till the next French election, pro-Zemmour and anti-Zemmour factions; the former who think that he is one of the few ‘good’ ones and that his ethnicity should be overlooked; the latter who have good reason to think that he is as bad as the rest.
Nor do I believe that prioritizing Covid over ethnonationalism and all other core DR causes and ideologies is in any way sensible. Since Cat claims that all arguments in this regard appeal to emotions, I am going to provide one that is rational in a response to this comment because of the character limit.
Less
Reply
9
2
Hide replies
@CaesarAvg
20 days ago
Whatever Covid is, various attempts at explanation can be bifurcated into two genera.
Firstly, let us assume that Covid and the Covax is all that the mainstream tell us it is. That Covid is real and the Covax works. Explanations in this genus (e.g., Covid is the result of Chinese people eating infected bats; Covid is an escaped bioweapon from Wuhan) all lead to one outcome: that in retrospect, all of the time and effort that has been put into discussing this topic by people like Martinez will be both an embarrassment and a waste of time, a mere distraction from real problems. So if this genera contains the correct explanation, prioritizing Covid over standard DR causes or ideologies will clearly be viewed as a mistake in hindsight.
Secondly, let us assume that Covid and Covax is what the ‘conspiracy theorists’ tell us it is, following Cat’s reasoning. That Covid is either fake or overblown; that the Covax is something malicious (e.g. the Covax will in the long-term be revealed to be a slow-acting poison or sterilization agent for population control purposes). These also all lead to one outcome: that the conspirators behind this have been so remarkably successful in this deliberate plot that an informal big tent group such as ourselves, that has been unable to resolve any of our issues no matter how slowly they unfold, cannot possibly solve this one which has progressed far quicker.
Cat has indeed decided that something is unique about this problem, such that we need to form a coalition with anyone who is opposed to this plot. Yet Whites did not need the help of non-whites to repel the Mongols, Moors or Turks, or to survive the Black Plague. What then has changed? But let us follow Cat’s reasoning further and assume that this problem indeed necessitates us being instrumentally ‘anti-jab’, ‘anti-lockdown’, ‘anti-mask’, ‘anti-elite’, etc. until the problem has gone, at which point we can return to classic DR issues. Continued below:
Less
Reply
7
1
Hide replies
@CaesarAvg
20 days ago
Yet the DR itself cannot openly join the opposition simply because this helps the plotters: it further allows them to label all of their enemies as ‘Far-Right Nazis’ as both of you have noted earlier. It would be thus counterproductive to formally declare the DR anti-plot. Thus Cat’s reasoning is that we only really have one way to contribute to opposing it: we must instrumentally blend in with the standard opposition and redirect all of our time and energy into fighting it.
Need I remind people, however, that such an ‘optical’ or ‘optics cucking’ approach has not worked for any other DR issues. It has not worked for Fuentes and America First; Taylor and American Renaissance, Patrick Casey and ‘Restoring Order’, etc. If we cannot resolve any of our ‘classic’ issues using optical or entryist methods, it is strange to suggest that it will suddenly work for this one specific issue. If the ideas within this genus turn out to be correct (that the Covax will indeed turn out to be for depopulation purposes), it is worth remembering that billions of people have already been vaxxed. They are then already dead men walking; most of the planet will be infertile, enslaved, dead, etc. within years. If we cannot stop issues that have developed over the course of decades or centuries, ask yourselves how well we will fare against a problem that has unfolded so rapidly less than two years ago? Again, we arrive at a dead end: they’ve decisively won before anyone realized they were at war with us, and we’re just cataloguing the unravelling of their plot to small audiences largely pushed to the deep web… by the plotters’ own deplatforming.
Less
Reply
3
1
Hide replies
@CaesarAvg
20 days ago
To conclude, whatever Covid is, neither conclusion I have reached relies on an appeal to emotion nor on any other kind of argumentative fallacy.
If there is no plot, Covid is for us merely a distraction that will be viewed as an embarrassing waste of time in hindsight, only contributing further to us being viewed as ‘conspiracy loons’, etc.
If there is a plot, Covid is for us a problem that greatly exceeds anything we have prior faced. Unable even to reverse moral decline despite its gradual unfolding over centuries, or reverse demographic replacement despite its gradual unfolding over decades, it is obviously unfeasible to reverse a plot that has rapidly unfolded over mere years.
Next, we should keep in mind that globalism/globalization, the consequence of lacking racial or even mere national consciousness, is the precise reason that a ‘global pandemic’ is even believable. How could there ever be a ‘global’ pandemic without this atomized ‘shrinking world’ with fast long-distance travel and lax borders, the same world that we here are all committed to altering? The very thing she suggests we downplay at the moment for optical reasons happened also to be the very thing that would have made the Covid plot unfeasible to begin with. A global pandemic simply would not exist in a nationalist world.
Lastly, we should also consider the unintended consequences of too close an association with those whose arguments for being ‘anti-vax’ and so forth stem from libertarian ideologies. Deng justified to the CPC Left his capitalist revisionism by claiming that they would return to socialism at some later time after China gets wealthier… just as Cat claims we will return to our core issues after a ‘post-Covid’ world is realized. Yet whether it was his intent or not, Deng ended up taking the CPC down a path of no return. Building bridges to people whose ideologies ours have already transcended can lead to ideological regression and future divisions.
Less
5
1
@alan_B_stard_M_P
20 days ago
the Covid demonstratios are ridiculous. This is a good time to complain about immigration. Covid is imported, and the only way to stop it is stopping immigration
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@Vesper
20 days ago
You took the vax.
Reply
@Fascist-Freddy
19 days ago
“I’m not religious I’m spiritual” What does this mean? I’ve heard it before. If you don’t believe in the Holy Spirit, then what spirit do you believe in?
Reply
8
5
Hide replies
@EustaceBagg
11 days ago
A religion is a set of specific rules, strictures, celebrations and particular entities, that requires a preservation of textual or oral information to perpetuate. Religious authorities are needed to maintain ideological purity and interpret oral or textual information ‘appropriately’.
Spirituality is a general belief in the supernatural. A god or gods, consciousness and life permeating every atom of reality. That schizotypal view that everything happens at the behest of someone or something’s will, nothing is truly coincidence, nothing is truly accidental, etc.
Of course, there’s tremendous overlap. Everyone who follows a religion (by the strictest definition of the word), is spiritual. They believe in unseen entities watching them and fucking around with them and the world at large…for some reason.
Not everybody who is spiritual, has a religion though. You can believe in unseen entities without giving them Hebrew names.
What spirit does she believe in? I have no idea. Just as you don’t need to give your pet entities Hebrew names, you don’t need to give them any names or properties at all. A sort of agnostic spirituality.
Less
Reply
@Tyler
20 days ago
The demographics battle has only been lost when we have been eliminated, before that it will be a continuing fight as we fight becoming an even smaller minority. Increasingly convinced that this woman is a rediculous person.
Reply
8
@Fascist-Freddy
20 days ago
34:56
– I don’t know what she’s talking about, because she’s a woman. She’s still high on the progessive stack and is privileged and protected. She gets affirmative action. Try being a White male.
Reply
8
@Wibble
20 days ago
I joined live but late, just as chat were having a mass attack of the vapours and swooning en-masse….
“I didn’t like what she said about XXX…SHUN HER…DESTROY HER!”
You guys…..you are going to be left with a very very small movement if you keep shunning everyone who doesn’t match your ideals on every point…
You’ll probably be in a movement of 1…..and they you’ll argue with yourself about something….then never speak to yourself again…
Less
Reply
8
3
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
20 days ago
Christ you’re an idiot. She was basically saying “give up on Demographics and just focus on covid!” How tf did you expect majority of people to react to that?
Reply
3
4
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Because Covid is the thing they are currently using to focus their attack on us. Previously, it was immigration. But the immigration was intended to break down our societies so we would be less resistant to the “pandemic”. And the “pandemic” will make us less able to fight back against whatever their next step is.
Reply
4
1
@Wibble
20 days ago
That ship sailed in the 1960’s
There is absolutely nothing the man in the street can do to change that, people have tried, and talked the talk ever since then with absolutely zero results.
Hate to say it, but she’s right.
Maybe with a minor miracle, a party may come into power, and remain in power for the next 40 or 50 years to reverse that, but its pretty unlikely don’t you think…?
Oh and the second you start spitting out personal insults you concede the argument…
Less
Reply
2
2
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
19 days ago
Okay defeatist 😂
0
0
Hide replies
@Wibble
18 days ago
Realist…based of decades of personal experience
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
18 days ago
Sure whatever you say defeatist
Reply
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Many of them WANT to be isolated losers. It is important to understand that and separate such people out from those who want to win. The losers revel in being outcasts and they don’t actually want normal people to join their fringe club. And the reason they are outcasts is largely because they are unable to get along with others. So leave them to their feminine histrionics and focus instead on those who want to win. Those who want to win may disagree on things, but they don’t waste time arguing over who gets to be in their “club”.
Less
Reply
7
3
Hide replies
@Wibble
19 days ago
I think you are correct, some of them really get into their purity spiral…
“We’re so hard core, so pure, there’s only three of us, and we don’t allow new members into our mini club…oh wait…two of us now, Steve just said something I didn’t like”
And yes, it does seem very feminine doesn’t it? I wonder about the age of many? There just zero maturity in their arguments, and they are arguments not debates or discussions, it’s all tears and tantrums, no emotional control or reason, just swearing and rants…
I have a friend of over 30 years, very lefty in many respects, but we have a ton of fun sparring with each other, we’ve never sworn at each other and usually laugh whilst doing it, something many of your detractors would find impossible to do, as I say, maybe its maturity, i’m am getting on in years…hah
Less
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@DanIbsen
19 days ago
This isn’t even close to what I’m seeing in the comments.
It seems to be almost unanimous that almost anything can be looked past except one thing, we don’t abandon fighting for a homeland for our peoples.
This isn’t a case of a purity spiral, it is a case of the last line drawn in the sand.
Do you for some reason expect people to have a debate or discussion on the question of if we should fight for the existance of our people? I sure don’t, because it is an axiomatic cornorstone of why they care about all the other issues. Thus no debate is going to be had over this issue, it will be pure emotion and the one topic they will react the strongest to.
We can debate the validity of taking in allying with gay people, black people, brown people, muslims, if we want a monarchy, democracy, fascism, wellfare state, the patchwork of a thousand cities, gun rights, etc.
But the one thing that will always trigger pure emotion will be saying that demographic replacement is over and that we should move on. Because if that cornorstone is removed, then the reason to care about all those other issues disappears as those don’t happen to your group but someone elses.
Less
3
0
Hide replies
@Wibble
19 days ago
Hey i hope we get to waive immigrants a fond farewell as they bugger off back to where they came from…..
But I’ve been hoping that for decades and far from seeing any glimmer of that happening, or any political party coming to power to make this happen…..there’s nothing…
In fact the opposite is happening and has been happening, as i say, since the 60’s….
And it is getting worse….even with the covid restrictions…more and more cross the borders every week…
So…how much longer do I continue to hope??
Or do I say This is never going to happen, pick another battle…?
Less
Reply
1
2
Hide replies
@DanIbsen
19 days ago
I responded regarding your characterization of responses as purity spiralling and emotional.
I didn’t make any claim to how it is going or what you should do.
Sure you can say “This is never going to happen, pick another battle”, but you should already know my answer to this as it is quite clear from the previous post.
I don’t care about the other battles if it means accepting that there isn’t a future for my people, and this is the general sentiment of the comment section. And this is why this is my main focus despite having lost hope in it myself, but that doesn’t mean you just roll over.
We can talk about putting it on the back burner as a matter of pursuation, tactics, optics, strategic retreat or any other reason, but it doesn’t stop being the fundamental goal and driving force of why the other battles matter.
If the demographic replacement is just marked as lost, then all the other battles become empty and just another white mans burden of improving the world for those who aren’t us.
Less
Reply
3
0
Hide replies
@Wibble
19 days ago
Yeah i can agree with that, putting it on the back burner, hopefully the times will change and we can bulk buy one way tickets for our unwanted house guests.
As i say, I believe, at least for now, demographic replacement is a lost battle, it’s only worsened year on year since the 60’s.
Any political party is crushed, any grass roots movement will be swept away, you are up against the full weight of the state, so you are really going to struggle to get any noticable success, this is why i say pick another battle…
Of course all this is possibly moot, you cannot have any kind of welfare state with open borders, so maybe as that collapses, and the immigrants free hand-outs cease, they may head for pastures new?
Although from what i’ve seen, i suspect the hand outs will only end for those that have paid into the state their entire life, whilst the migrants will still live a life of luxury at the tax payers expense? Certainly seems to be what I’m seeing here in EU land today.
Going to be an interesting next few years.
Less
Reply
1
@DanIbsen
19 days ago
When taking everything else I’ve heard and read from you into account, I don’t believe you mean this the way that it is coming off.
This comment is coming off very red team – blue team like.
“What are we fighting for?”
“Don’t know, but we are winning against the red team and I really want to win”
“Go team blue”
Less
Reply
2
1
@Beavis-N-Butthurt
1 hour ago
Cat, what real world work have you done to fight these issues ?
Reply
@cmsarpedon
17 days ago
She is EXACTLY the “Im spiritual, but not religious” stereotype 🤣
Reply
7
2
@DanIbsen
19 days ago
Finally watched it to the end and in many ways she reminds me of Panama Hat in “Ride the Tiger” hosted by Academic Agent.
Start out by saying something defeatist where the obvious interpretation is to abandon the fight for ensuring your ingroups survival.
Clarify it to just be a tactic and the long term goal still being the survival of the ingroup.
Repeat those steps until the viewer have no idea what her position really is.
Is she formulating herself badly?
Is she trolling the viewers?
Or is she simply shielding herself from the backlash?
I ended up feeling that all these possibilities were equally likely.
Less
Reply
7
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
Probably just formulating it badly. It was not my intention to have that be the bulk of the discussion and so it was not a topic I had prepared to speak on. I generally don’t do well if I have to speak off the top of my head and haven’t thought first about what I want to say and what the best way is to say it.
But the fact is, you won’t be able to fight for your survival within a tightly controlled smart city under total surveillance. Ergo, fight tyranny now so that you still have the option of fighting for your people later.
Less
Reply
4
2
@Holocaust
20 days ago
Christ is King…
Reply
7
5
Hide replies
@Bukitburg
19 days ago
Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi
Reply
4
2
Hide replies
@lagud
18 days ago
learn more…
Reply
0
2
@lagud
18 days ago
When Pilate saw that he was not succeeding at all,
but that a riot was breaking out instead,
he took water and washed his hands in the sight of the crowd
saying, “I am innocent of this man’s blood.
Look to it yourselves.”
And the crowd of Jews said in reply,
“His blood be upon us and upon our children”
Less
Reply
0
2
@lancebiggums
20 days ago
i won’t dislike to express disagreement with the guest, but I disagree about giving up on resisting white replacement
Reply
7
@georgie173148
20 days ago
I think Cat’s position is being misinterpreted.
Europeans are now a diaspora. As a diaspora members can BOTH engage in activism to combat totalitarianism AND engage in activism to support White Wellbeing.
Jason and Jared are un-demoralising more and more people every week.
Going Free groups are proliferating. There is a website for teaching children about Westpeople and their history and culture. People like Jared and Fornelius are keeping the European Bio-spirit alive with their music. Other people are going rural and networking.
There is a positive future available. 💚👍👶
Less
Reply
7
1
@Bearcingetorix
13 days ago
Reply
6
2
Hide replies
@Bearcingetorix
13 days ago
What can be said that hasn’t been said about this oddly masculine (mostly autistic) poseur already within the comments? The white pill is most men clearly see through this… bitchy grifter. She takes pleasure in being contrarian, she enjoys pissing men off while denying her intent. She’s overly pessimistic, while demanding optimism, claims agency, yet denies agency, claims spirituality, denies religiosity, a walking contradiction and a creature of spite. She gets off on shaming men, while accepting no responsibility, and demanding equality while expecting to be dominated. Anyone who takes this… narcissist… seriously is deluded. Is there anything worse than a female who doesn’t know her place? The men who defend them and put up with their crap I suppose.
Less
Reply
4
@Marsupilami
19 days ago
Everyone who does not get Philosophicat’s argument is just strategically inapt. Prepare for martyrdom, but don’t expect to win.
Reply
5
7
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
19 days ago
spoken like a true retarded simp
Reply
7
5
Hide replies
@Marsupilami
18 days ago
Trust the plan!
Reply
0
3
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
18 days ago
yeah, cat’s I assume huh?
1
@Marsupilami
17 days ago
Nah, it was just some bs of mine, sorry.
What of here arguments are flawed?
Do you think whites should turn the tables alone? in my home country at least 70% of whites are pro vaxx, pro mass immigration… they can’t think critically.
I was shocked by the dictatorship the people behind the government are erecting, but the harder shock was how absolute obtuse my folks are.
Less
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
2 days ago
2nd reply. You can harp on all you want about covid, about the fuckin vaccines, but unless you have a real plan, that’s not just autistically put together to the point it’s not even coherent, everything that you and cat are proposing is absolute shit. You, and especially cat are calling this “strategic”. There’s nothing strategic about this. It’s all opinions, it’s all “Oh well I think x or y would be nice” and that’s about it. That’s all there is to this so called “strategy”.
Less
@JacobJ4746
2 days ago
1st reply
Okay, let’s see what your “side” is autistically proposing.
1. Give up on the west, cause vaccinations.
2. Fly off to who the hell knows where, cause shit is bad.
3. Also still somehow fight covid while partnering with a mythical number of nonwhites that don’t exist (only some would extend their hands to partner up), yet fly off to who the hell knows where and somehow still fight covid?
Did you or anyone else like you ever take the time to think this through?
So you’ll be fighting covid how exactly? You’ve screwed off to where the covid crap doesn’t exist, so idk how tf you’re suppose to fight anything when you’ve ran away from the fight itself.
I also fail to see how you’ll manage to do anything with the realistically small amounts of nonwhites who’ll be willing to set aside their in group preferences over Covid. Again talking about probably some hundreds, or less, nowhere close to thousands.
And again, you’re also proposing to screw off to where governments aren’t enforcing lock downs and vaccines. How tf are you going to accomplish anything when you’ve decided to RUN AWAY?
Less
@JacobJ4746
2 days ago
3rd Reply. What do you think would happen? That these hostile governments would just let you back in? Or that with this”space” in some random country will give you time to think or plan? Why TF shouldn’t the planning be happening here in the west? You know where the fight is actually happening! What changes or impact are some handfuls of non-whites going to have exactly? I’ve had many people respond to me on telegram over Cats proposed “partnership”, going back and forth from “Oh it’s about numbers!” to “Look it’s not about numbers!” I’ve had idiots from your “side” tie themselves into knots because this is all incoherent opinions being promoted as “strategy”.
Less
@Marsupilami
1 day ago
All I’m saying is stay ethnocentric, but still cooperate with or at least use other ethnicities that oppose patronizing governments.
White is not enough, by the way. Most of my fellow whites are the biggest problem, like e.g. 80% of the politicians and the people who voted for them.
What is your plan, btw?
Reply
@Asha
5 days ago
Having brown grandchildren is not winning.
Reply
5
0
Hide replies
@Marsupilami
5 days ago
No way it is. And Philosophicat is expressis verbis NOT talking about marrying interacially.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Asha
4 days ago
Delegitimising the importance of preserving our destinct genetic identity by referring to such efforts as “petty demographic squabbles” seems to sit more in favour of miscegenation than not.
Obviously she doesn’t actually support racemixing (or so one would hope), but she should be careful about using such clumsy, dangerous rhetoric.
2
@ShadowCyborg
19 days ago
I agree with her. Fighting against this medical tyranny could bring us much acclaim among the common people. It’s a matter of time before the overton window shifts and the majority of the people realize they have been deceived. People with health problems or deaths in their families are connecting the dots and linking this to the deathvaxx.
Reply
5
3
@NorseNature
19 days ago
1
my first instinct was to reject cat’s claim that demographics shouldn’t be the current focus but by the end I realized she is correct. her first statement on the issue wasn’t the best in getting the idea across. I think her putting demographics in the bin of “lost battles” is the problem. Demographics CANNOT be lost because it IS existence, without winning the demographic issue we can’t do anything. In reality we need to change our language in the demographic battle to fit within the larger war of absolute tyranny we see today.
Less
Reply
6
2
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
Yes, I could have been more specific. Reclaiming the ethnostate at this point is probably a lost cause for all but eastern Europe. But white people will continue to survive.
Reply
1
3
@K
19 days ago
she is 100% correct and all the negative reactions are just copium.
however it is our duty as men to turn lost battles into glorious victories.
we dont have the comfort to indulge in rational pragmatism of “moving on” to other battles. we dont move on. we win or we perish.
Reply
5
8
@Tyler
20 days ago
Alinsky’s rules only work against people who care about consistancy and honesty, so we should not assume they will work against the left.
Reply
6
@TheGrettaresetta
20 days ago
Great convo, I’m glad she didn’t play to the crowd for purely tribal reasons. 👍
Reply
5
3
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
I will never pander to the crowd!
Reply
2
@bpillundivided
19 days ago
This is one of the more fun Millenniyules, purely based on how Cat handled herself.
If disagreement entertainment is not a thing – it should be. An untapped niche.
Reply
5
1
@lttpxsnjusodutzsyb
19 days ago
What difference does ‘medical tyranny’ make when your people have lost their homeland? My city has been made overwhelmingly Asian during my lifetime; I want the living conditions of the invaders to be dreadful.
Reply
5
@GeezerGaming
20 days ago
I get where she’s coming from on the “join forces thing,” but, in practice, it seems like whites will be marching in the streets to protest tyranny while the magical people will be either jumping them the second they turn around and/or smashing Nordstrom jewelry cases while the shock troops descend on the peaceful whites. I’m just very skeptical about what “cooperation” will amount to RN. Things are getting a little too crazy a little too fast to hold out any hope for that. It may just be circle the wagons time. Sorry for the black pill.
Less
Reply
5
0
Hide replies
@Karl_Taranis
17 days ago
you’ll like when Blackpill is a guest of Collins in a couple days.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@GeezerGaming
15 days ago
I like Devon. I’m incredibly envious of his 3D animation chops.
Reply
@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 days ago
This stream was the best of the day, because of the shitstorm it created.
God I love Christmas.
Reply
5
1
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Lol, I’m glad I didn’t ruin your Christmas!
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
20 days ago
Wouldn’t be christmas without a family argument.
Reply
2
@Asha
5 days ago
“Petty demographic squabbles”?
Aside from the truly defeatist underestimation on the reversability of our genocide, her comments on Peterson are spot on.
Reply
4
@peil2451
12 days ago
Philosophicat has done wondeful work. Her Evola series is a masterpiece.
Reply
3
3
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
She is obviously right in saying that the imminent medical tyranny has to be defeated first. Dissent would become impossible under the techocratic control grid that is intended to come in through the vaccine passport.
Reply
4
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
This movement is not in condition to fight ANYTHING. We have NOTHING to fight them with.
Reply
1
3
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
There are a lot of people who oppose medical tyranny, and who are now perhaps more amenable to hearing other anti-system truths as a result of this current overreach by the elite.
Reply
3
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
Going out on the street with a sign is not resistanse. Multibilliondollar legal firms together suing every level of government is resistanse.
2
2
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
Check out France. What’s happening there is a little bit more than just holding signs.
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
I have, they have been protesting for 3 years now and it has brought them NOTHING.
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
18 days ago
retarded doomer arguing
Reply
1
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
18 days ago
Yet you didn’t even have a single argument against me.
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
14 days ago
“Give up! Give up! lol u don’t have a single argument against me! Yes I’m a retard!” 😂
Reply
0
1
Hide replies
@ST-TV
14 days ago
You are the retarted one here.
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
1 day ago
“I’m not u are!” Damn what a comeback! 😂
Reply
0
1
@dakotajoe
19 days ago
Mandates for COVID vaccine aren’t allowed in my state, life has gone on in a relatively normal fashion. I’ve had family members give birth to healthy children.
The lockdowns have only improved my life because I can work remotely and moved to a lower cost of living area while keeping my job which has put more money into my pockets. Not locked forced to commute to a soul-sucking corporate office has improved my well-being.
I’m currently opposed to COVID vaccine mandates but is it medical tyranny to mandate the smallpox vaccine? Being anti-vax used to be the domain of Hollywood and Portland, Oregon…I guess times have changed.
Less
Reply
4
2
Hide replies
@MrQuestion
18 days ago
The mRNA injection is nothing like a normal vaccine, has zero long term safety data and is being mandated by employers which is unprecedented.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@dakotajoe
18 days ago
Not all the vaccines are mRNA.
I took the Johnson and Johnson which isn’t mRNA – never felt better in my life 2 days after a trained professional administered the antidote.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Karl_Taranis
17 days ago
So are you going to do the booster now, because after six months they say you need a booster or you’re not vaxed. I took the J n J too, but no way am i doing a booster. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
1
@dakotajoe
16 days ago
most likely no booster for me at this point.
The newer variants are reportedly weaker and they lost my trust a long time ago.
More available treatments post-infection lower the need for vaccine further.
Reply
1
@Charles1625
19 days ago
An excellent interview with a very perceptive, intelligent guest.
Reply
4
@Tyler
20 days ago
Most of the people I see protesting the vaccine are white
Reply
4
0
Hide replies
@Karl_Taranis
17 days ago
BLM had a protest against the vax passport measures at restaurants in NYC during the summer. I’m no fan of BLM, but would join with them on this issue, plus they have billions of dollars.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@JacobJ4746
13 days ago
you realize they would have you first make some sort of pledge to their own true “causes” than go along with you simply over Covid?
Reply
@Tyler
20 days ago
Andrew Anglin as he brings covid to the forfront sill has the demographic clock on the stormer at all times, so kinda silly to compare yourself to him if you see demographics as a lost cause.
Reply
4
1
@tRad_Dad
20 days ago
The bottom line is non whites have ALOT to gain from this era where liberal democracy has targeted white dignity, safety and prosperity to transfer onto others. Philosophicat wants us to alli with anyone who will stand with Us but non whites aren’t choosing to because Uncle Sam is in the process of showering & pampering them.
Reply
4
1
Hide replies
@3xchann
19 days ago
PC is a civ nat who doesn’t understand that fighting against a metaverse is not something worth fighting for. No matter what happens, when whites are a minority we are fucked whether the elites are in power or not. It’s ironic that someone who is a philosopher doesn’t seem to grasp the importance of preserving white ethnic identity.
Reply
3
@MiddleClassTwit
20 days ago
Whatever you think of Cat’s suggestion, something just happened there. And then there was the next guest talking about Agenda 21 and all that. Did Woes have a cunning plan?
Reply
4
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
We actually did not plan to discuss that subject in such depth. We actually had like two other topics to cover that we didn’t even get to.
Reply
3
@topper
20 days ago
Will these discussions be posted elsewhere? Odysee is so infuriating as a platform as to be untenable. On neither web nor app is it possible to do anything but listen from the start. Any attempt to rewind or fast forward results in the sound cutting out for five minutes at a time.
Reply
3
5
Hide replies
@robsfield
20 days ago
Allegedly, you can use something like the “YoutubeDL” bot on telegram to grab an offline copy of odysee videos. And the android VLC app will let you play them audio only like a podcast. Or so I’ve heard that’s what the kids are doing these days
Reply
1
@formflowlightshadow
5 days ago
Bitchute
Reply
@Iagree
5 days ago
“petty demographic problems”??
very clumsy
Reply
2
1
@PoliTrek
6 days ago
I want to say I respect Philosophicat, I think she is intelligent and has made valuable contributions. But frankly this video is a great example of why some decisions regarding fundamental civilizational direction is best left to men. The demographic question is basically the keystone to everything else. If anything the covid stuff is a distraction from the central demographic issues. Keeping the dialogue up about the past, and where things went wrong is important because it builds a narrative of historical evidence of why we are correct. Those past revisionist points connect to paint a picture, and it is relevant because it build the world we have today. Covid rules exist to further their agenda of replacement.
Less
Reply
2
@Alexander
10 days ago
Classic. “If we have more non Whites at anti lockdown rallies, then it’s harder for them to call us extreme neo Nazis”. According to this quote all our struggle from 1945 onward has been irrelevant because it’s only White people engaging in preserving our countries. Maybe we should ‘recruit’ non Whites to fight for us, right? And to fight for our children, and for the 14 words? Trans racialism is a thing apparently, perhaps some of us should sacrifice and change their race lmao
Less
Reply
3
1
@Alexander
10 days ago
She’s so quick to throw demographics under the bus yet she will NEVER, not in 1 MILLION years, move to a minority White neighborhood. And as SOON as a black guy will hit on her, she will go home, cry in her bedroom and think “these people are savages, where are all the white men?!”
These people will only realize what is going on once “diversity” kicks them in the face, literally.
Less
Reply
2
3
@Alleric
12 days ago
This woman needs to be kicked to the Tories where she belongs.
I can’t believe what I just heard. If our women keep defaulting on the slightest of road bumps, they’ll need to be cast out completely and should we gain victory, they actually need to be enslaved and never be allowed to make societal decisions again. I consider her treasonous now. Either we as a race have women we can depend on or they need to be considered little more than children that are used to create offspring.
Less
Reply
3
2
@nixzzo
14 days ago
Everything that is worng with the world in one package.
Reply
2
2
@Chadthefamous
15 days ago
when has anyone on the right protested demographic replacement? they protested statues and stolen election, but never replacement. for you to say stop speaking out on a subject that has never been addressed for another subject is just bullshit. we need to address it all and attack it all. it takes one piece of land to declare a white ethnostate and others will follow. don’t preach about giving up because the left is attacking multiple fronts and so should we.
Less
Reply
3
@ScythianDragon
17 days ago
Cat is very smart and very pretty
Reply
3
8
@SpiritualDiscussion
18 days ago
Only Blood can defeat materialism.
Blood carries the soul, literally.
Reply
3
0
Hide replies
@Monkeymakefire
19 hours ago
thought that was in the pancreas…
Reply
@Pacifican
19 days ago
The right must sacrfice fighting yesterday’s battles for power. It must stitch together the schizophrenic and random public attention into a somewhat consistent platform, and even more importantly, an aesthetic.
The left does not have nearly as divergent as a base, in fact as leftists become extreme, they converge on communism. As rightists become more extreme, they diverge: monarchism, anarchism, fascism, etc. We like to be correct, but sometimes we ought to worry less about that and more about winning against what is clearly the enemy.
Less
Reply
3
1
@WMSTEOOPAAFFWC
19 days ago
wew
so we have learned that the scientific method is ‘materialist’ and baseless unempirical superstition is superior, therefore knowledge or truth are unavailable and all such beliefs are equivalent; white replacement is a dead issue, lost already (please ignore France), great reset is a totally separate issue to white genocide, please stop talking about the latter; coronavirus hysteria is all that matters; astrology is very important and interesting; ‘nazism’ is ridiculous and cringe; patriot front are feds; in order to stay out of the gulags ‘we’ must ally with based brown people, trannies, fags and jews because we’re all in this together yuguize, the ‘oligarchs’ are the real enemy; having white-only demonstrations is really bad optics because it makes it easy for the media to call ‘us’ far-right neo-nazis, they can’t do that if the anti-covid demonstration is diverse yuguize (lol); aguments against white replacement are simply reducible to ‘muh feels’ but great reset arguments are not for some reason; demographic trends in certain countries are lost (USA, France), but not in other countries (Poland) because her timeframe is like +/-20-40 years; what is race anyway?; great reset is actually great replacement, please ignore previous remarks (???); ‘we’ must be smart and agile and not too married to ‘lost’ battles, think ‘strategically’ and stop fighting yuguize. ‘loss’ condition = my social media account for attention whoring has been banned. therefore don’t think about race;
seems like an incoherent mess tbh. optics cucking or prioritizing topics for supposedly strategic reasons just allows yourself to undermine or abandon your own purported belief system/issues/political frame, by you or by other hostile actors. hmmm big think.
Less
Reply
3
1
@oppoten
19 days ago
I think she seeks to be contrary sometimes, like she thinks she’s too good to hold positions that are commonly held. The sound of her voice is suited to it.
After the UK Column discussion, a lot of this seems pointless tbh. Any change that we could enact is at too low a level to make any real difference.
Reply
2
2
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
I do enjoy being contrary, but I don’t seek contrariness just for it’s own sake. But yes, I do have an annoying voice, I’ll grant you that.
Reply
1
@arklowrockz
20 days ago
At approximately
9:00
that is a good discussion point. It is peculiar the way some folks (particularly the I Fucking Love Science crowd) say they are spiritual (despite the obnoxious annexing of Science as THEIR domain)….does seem to indicate a longing innate to all of us…..
Reply
3
@theReactoSphere
3 days ago
Philosophicat did nothing wrong! #ibatforthecat
Reply
1
2
@ClownworldSquad
3 days ago
Philosophicat is a good example of why women shouldn’t be in leader positions and especially not have a big presence on social-media. Imagine having someone like that in an army – blackpilling everyone and being constantly vague.
Reply
2
@MelGibsmedat
6 days ago
This is why women were never entrusted with defending Western Civilization, or any society. They immediately default to self-preservation and display all the traits you’d associate with a coward if it were a man. How many children does Philisophicat have? I hope she isn’t just an irreligious cat lady using spirituality as a cope. Calling people NPCs for relying on traditional religion, while you indulge in this ‘spirituality’ nonsense in really cringe.
Less
Reply
2
@Alexander
10 days ago
Oh stop with the BS. You mentioned Scotland and the White Scots being so compliant with the restrictions and everything. What, do you think that all Whites are compliant? Compliance is mainly a Western European trait that evolved in the last decades. Take a look at Central and Eastern Europe, hell, my home country Romania is basically an ethnostate, with the 2nd largest minority being other Europeans(aka Hungarians), we’re all White here and we’re 37% vaccinated. Look at Belarus, Russia, Austria. And even if most people in other Central/Eastern countries are vaccinated, you still see hundreds of thousands demonstrating in the streets daily. Vaccinated standing with the unvaccinated(in Italy and Austria). Look at the protests in France, Paris, there are barely any non Whites there, and Paris is probably worse off than London, demographically speaking. You don’t see mass protests in the Philippines, Indonesia, or other non White countries affected by this pandemic(there aren’t even that many but still). Whites are the only ones protesting against this.
EDIT: You see more non Whites protesting in Belgium, Brussels because that’s where the EU parliament is and many countries in Europe and the UN send their representatives to. But still, the masses are overwhelmingly White, you might see some non Whites there, mainly gypsies or Albanians, but there are hardly any Arabs or black people there.
Less
Reply
2
1
@Weltenesche
10 days ago
This just goes to show once more that it’s a masculine trait to think in the span of generations and a feminine trait to think in the here and now.
Both are important, but if the feminine way of thinking becomes too dominant, we die.
Reply
2
@DaveDogge
17 days ago
A smart gal, got her head screwed on right. But I’m hearing a lot of problems being highlghted we need solutions and we need them right now – that’s the priority.
Reply
2
@evropææsthetica
18 days ago
Is anyone else having the sound go out 1/3 through the video? I can’t watch this video on mobile (browser or app) and desktop because the sound disappears. This has happened in other Milleniyules videos for me too.
Reply
2
0
Hide replies
@mrsjustinebrown
18 days ago
Yes me too
Reply
1
@alan_B_stard_M_P
19 days ago
Philosophicat who appears to have stopped reply says
@philosophicat
” I’ll say what I want for whatever reasons I feel like. I think I know more about what my intentions are than you do. “
Quite right dear, correct. and I don’t challenge your intentions. I merely disagree with them. It’s Christmas. and it”s good manners to say so ” Merry Christmas ” to ya
Less
Reply
2
@DanIbsen
19 days ago
You can resist those things for a higher ideal because they are wrong in and of themselves.
But they are only wrong because they affect people, having draconian Great Reset rules doesn’t mean anything if they aren’t affecting people. And in this regard my primary concern is my people.
So telling me to stop focusing on the demographic replacement to focus on the Great Reset is the same as telling me to abandon my reason to fight in order to fight for the other groups.
We can discuss opposition to the Great Reset as a step in reclaiming our homelands, but if you are telling me it is a lost battle so we should move on then the only thing I’m moving on from is you.
Less
Reply
2
1
@Mackai
20 days ago
Yes, best stream of the day, other two chaps were moribund tbh
Reply
2
1
Hide replies
@Mackai
20 days ago
Three even
Reply
@lbryguy234
20 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
2
1
@Arcessitor
4 days ago
This entire video is an “enemy of my enemy is my friend” thing, but the problem is, that saying only works with NEUTRAL parties. Heteroethnics are not neutral, they TOO are our enemies. You cannot fight your enemies WITH your enemies. I’m sorry, but this is predicated on something completely wrong. And yeah, in the NL, Moroccans came out to riot because they’re animals. But the reason they oppose the government isn’t because they hate tyranny, but because they hate rule of law per se. They want a crime-riddled wasteland.
1:18:35
Way to completely miss the point and basically say “WELL YOURE LIKELY TO DIE OUT ANYWAY, SO TECHNICALLLYYYYYY” I get now why people were irritated seeing this. I suffered up to that point without a hitch, but that’s just pedantic, autistic nonsense.
Less
Reply
1
@MaidinCornwall
14 days ago
I agree totally
Reply
1
@JohnPalmer
17 days ago
Fantastic!
Reply
1
@t34p4rty
17 days ago
you and Kat need to do the stream on Rules For Radicals! Essential viewing
Reply
1
1
@WinstonWolf
18 days ago
Wish I could watch all these.
Reply
1
@RedPillFrog
18 days ago
U rock my socks, Woes!
Reply
1
@usofpostamerica
19 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
0
11
Hide replies
@James
19 days ago
But throwing stones at him is so pleasurable.
Reply
4
1
@usofpostamerica
19 days ago
Does anyone else experience the sound dropping out after browsing away from the video and coming back?
Reply
1
0
Show reply
@GigaChad
20 days ago
for the algorithm
Reply
1
1
@TheRavensHall
20 days ago
I agree with a lot of what philosophicat on this covid bullshit needs to be stopped or all is lost.
Reply
1
@Frenjamin
20 days ago
people could get used to covidranny, the covidyranny could end. whats not going away is identity and the current elite are there until there toppled.
Reply
1
@ClaireKhaw
20 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
0
8
Hide replies
@Monkeymakefire
19 hours ago
but islam is for camel jockeys.
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@ClaireKhaw
8 hours ago
The American Republic was founded on Islamic principles. The First Amendment was based on quran.com/2/256
Reply
@lbryguy234
20 days ago
This comment was slimed to death.
Reply
0
7
Hide replies
@millennialwoes
20 days ago
No, it is representative of reality. I think you must be mistaken somehow.
Reply
8
@Daizus
6 days ago
The enemy of your enemy is not your friend, just another enemy.
Reply
[Removed]
10 days ago
On Antifa – Ernst Nolte’s description of fascism as anti-modern. Then I suppose Antifa’s actions to label any sort of anti-progress as fascist and joining with the state to destroy this opposition as not strange at all. Am I off base here?
Reply
@Fascoracetam
11 days ago
the medical tyranny and the white replacement go hand in hand why do you think they kicked it all off after white identitarian and populist movements started to rise
Reply
@StringfellowHawke
12 days ago
I am so glad you two had this discussion, I totally agree that the medical tyranny has to be tactically placed higher in priority – this is absolutely correct and I don’t see it being discussed anywhere else in our circles…. Great discussion…
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@StringfellowHawke
12 days ago
btw – IT IS a nuanced position. It doesn’t say you fight the one to the “absolute” exclusion to the other or that the lower priority tactically is any less valid “on it’s own” as a concern. It simply a way of managing multiple fronts.
Reply
@Butter-Is-Gold-In-The-Cold
12 days ago
About the Spirit & Soul, I think of it as the Spirit being more mystical than the Soul. Body – Soul – Spirit. Quite like Body – Mind – Consciousness.
Reply
@deemster
17 days ago
The reason we pay heed to old battles is because they are the architecture of our current trajectory… Understanding how it happened is an integral part of moving forward—of avoiding the same pitfalls in the future. This vaxx control agenda is also a great opportunity to wake many Whites up to their suppressed racial consciousness (they’re less comfortable and more skeptical then they’ve been in a long time).
Less
Reply
@katana17
18 days ago
[Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 02 – PhilosophiCat – Dec 13, 2021 — Transcript]
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 02 – PhilosophiCat – Dec 13, 2021 — Transcript
Reply
@Fascist-Freddy
20 days ago
Which one of you is keeping a rooster?
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
19 days ago
I’m surrounded by roosters.
Reply
2
1
@Fascist-Freddy
20 days ago
Is this his second guest that does not live in their home country? The Golden One also alluded to not living in Sweden anymore. Is this girl Canadian or American?
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@Karl_Taranis
17 days ago
Golden One, Marcus, lives in Sweden. I think she lives in America now. She’s lived in many places.
Reply
@brucey_boy74
20 days ago
Sounds not working
Reply
0
0
Hide replies
@philosophicat
20 days ago
Make sure the volume icon is not muted.
Reply
1
@logosliterature
20 days ago
A pity the general population are not as physicalistic as rwers compulsively make them out to be (for they are the precise opposite – consider for example, the rise in popularity of “climate confessionals” wherein one confesses their “sins” against mother gaia [and the associated earth system eschatology]).
Reply
0
0
============================================
See Also:
Millenniyule 2021 – The Golden One
Millenniyule 2021 – 02 – PhilosophiCat
Millenniyule 2021 – 03 – Marc Malone
Millenniyule 2021 – 04 – Auron Macintyre
Millenniyule 2021 – 05 – UK Column
Millenniyule 2021 – 06 – Survive the Jive
Millenniyule 2021 – 07 – Mark Gullick
Millenniyule 2021 – 08 – Charles Robertson
Millenniyule 2021 – 09 – John Waters
Millennial Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — Jul 2, 2016 — TRANSCRIPT
A Woes By Any Other Name — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes – To Be a Man in 2017 – Speech at Erkenbrand dinner — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes – One Hour from Now – Speech to Erkenbrand — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes – The Passion of Jordan Peterson – Speech to Blue Awakening — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes at the Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2019 – Daughter of Albion – Dec 28, 2019 — Transcript
Millennial Woes – The Strife of Tongues – Nov 30, 2020 — Transcript
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – John Waters – Dec 22, 2020 — Transcript
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – On the Offensive – Dec 15, 2020 — Transcript
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – Dangerfield – Dec 21, 2020 — Transcript<
Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – The Jolly Heretic – Dec 29, 2020 — Transcript
============================================
PDF Notes
* Total words in transcript = 16,686
* Total words in post = 34,753
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =xx
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):
(Available later)
Version History
Version 5:
Version 4: Jan 3, 2022 — Updated my intro. Updated Odysee comments (355). Put PhiisophiCat’s Odysee comments in blue.
Version 3: Dec 27, 2021 — Updated Odysee comments (318).
Version 2: Dec 15, 2021 — Added See Also links to Millenniyule 2021 posts.
Version 1: Dec 14, 2021 — Published post. First 25 mins of transcript done. Remainder of transcript (25 – 101 mins) at 2/5 star quality. Added Odysee comments (165).
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – The Golden One – Dec 13, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 03 – Marc Malone – Dec 13, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 04 – Auron MacIntyre – Dec 13, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 07 – Mark Gullick – Dec 14, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 09 – John Waters – Dec 15, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 10 – Faust – Dec 15, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 11 – Snorkelblog – Dec 15, 2021 — Transcript | katana17
Pingback: Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2021 – 12 – Radical Liberation – Dec 15, 2021 — Transcript | katana17