Mark Collett
The Conservative Movement is
Morally Bankrupt
Fri, Sep 22, 2023
[In this video Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British nationalist movement, Patriotic Alternative, asks:
“The conservative movement jumps to the defence of men like Russell Brand and Andrew Tate whilst wilfully ignoring serious issues that affect ordinary people. What motivates leading conservative influencers in their desperate bids to court men who are anything but conservative?”
– KATANA]
https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20230922—The-Conservative-Movement-is-Morally-Bankrupt:7
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jXmyaxgWWKwR/
https://rumble.com/v3jr8sg-the-conservative-movement-is-morally-bankrupt.html
Published on Fri, Sep 22, 2023
Description
The Conservative Movement is Morally Bankrupt
September 22, 2023
2,536 views
299
17
Support
Save
2 Reposts
Share
Mark Collett
@MarkCollett
14K followers
Join
Following
The conservative movement jumps to the defence of men like Russell Brand and Andrew Tate whilst wilfully ignoring serious issues that affect ordinary people. What motivates leading conservative influencers in their desperate bids to court men who are anything but conservative?
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrh
LrsJUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
FREE eBook download:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/downloads/TheFallofWesternMan.pdf
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
andrew tate
russell brand
File size
178.26 MB
Less
10.17
98 comments
_____________
TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars
1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.
NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.
TRANSCRIPT
(Words: 2,106 – 13:44 mins)
So, by now I’ve already given my thoughts on Russell Brand on a couple of shows, including on my own show, Patriotic Weekly Review. However, I wanted to go into slightly more detail about how morally bankrupt the conservative movement really is. Because by now, you will have seen a sizeable number of leading conservative influencers and talking heads rushing to the defence of Russell Brand, just as they did with Andrew Tate.
Now, firstly, and in short, I do believe there is a large degree of truth to the accusations made about Russell Brand.
This is not a Brett Kavanaugh case – where one woman without any evidence what-so-ever steps forward to make a lurid historic accusation about a political figure who is about to be made a supreme court justice and has had an otherwise unblemished record as a moral and decent family man.
This is a case of a man who has been dogged by these accusations for decades – in fact he was first reported to the police for sexual crimes all the way back in 2003!
What’s more, dozens of both women and men who have worked with Brand on both sides of the Atlantic have now come forward and are telling their stories about what looks to be like one of the “best kept secrets in showbiz”. As such, this case seems to have far more in common with the cases of Harvey Weinstein, Jimmy Saville and Jeffrey Epstein than it does the case of Brett Kavanaugh.
What’s more, there were a number of warning signs about Brand – not least that he openly boasted of the fact he dated a sixteen-year-old school girl when he was in his 30s s in his book, he referred to the girl as “The Child”.
What’s more, his behaviour toward women and other colleagues was what any normal person would regard as at best highly odd, at worst, it was perverse and would have resulted in any normal person being sacked.
I don’t know about you, but I would expect any person who disrobed in front of colleagues in the office or who sat in business meetings in their pants to be swiftly receiving, at the very least, a harshly worded disciplinary letter. His actions were neither moral, nor the actions of a normal, well-adjusted or decent man – and the media loved him for this, painting him as “quirky” as he hid his lurid behaviour in plain sight under a cloak of “eccentricity”.
Yet here we are, much like with the case of Andrew Tate – a self-admitted online pimp, woman abuser and a man who made a fortune from exploiting needy and often vulnerable men who were simply looking for love, the conservative movement is rushing to the defence of Russell Brand and putting him on a pedestal.
But why is this? Why do so-called “conservative” pundits desperately pursue these men, run to their aid, and hold these men up as heroes and proclaim them to be victims of the system – or the “matrix”, as those who are down with the kids now call it?
Well, it seems that all any celebrity needs to do in order to become a darling of the mainstream conservative movement is make at least one reasonable statement of fact about at least one conservative talking point. Once said celebrity has thrown this crumb in the direction of the conservative movement, needy conservative show hosts and talking heads come running like lap dogs and will eagerly wave away anything that celebrity has said or done in the past – regardless of how questionable or depraved that act may have been.
The power that these crumbs from the table hold can be seen most notably in the case of Andrew Tate. So powerful is the lure of these crumbs that one particular and extremely well-known anti-Islam activist — who will remain nameless [Tommy Robinson?] — has been running defence for Tate, despite the fact Tate has openly stated his desire for Britain to become an Islamic republic! But who cares about the future of Britain, think of the tasty crumbs – and how much they could be worth in financial terms!
This all seems very contradictory and smacks of a movement that lacks any ideological or moral foundation.
So, what are the driving forces behind the conservative movement’s desire to jump to the defence of any one famous that says even the slightest thing that a conservative may agree with?
Well, the first observation one can make about this situation is that conservatives are so desperate for leadership and direction that every time anyone of note says the right thing, conservatives flock to that person proclaiming them to be the new hero of their movement.
In the case of Brand, he has made a few well thought out points about Big Pharma, Covid restrictions and global power structures – he also is not a fan of the war in the Ukraine.
Now at this point, I can totally understand why someone might wish to sit down with Brand and have an honest conversation with him about these topics. Obviously, I have a history with Russell Brand, and I would have definitely sat down with him and discussed whether his feelings on nationalism, globalism and mass immigration have changed.
But sitting down with someone and having a discussion with them is one thing, placing someone on a pedestal whilst ignoring a range of other uncomfortable issues is another thing entirely. Yet this is what the conservative movement does, and that’s exactly how the conservative movement ended up running defence for an online pimp [Tate] whose main source of income was ripping off the vulnerable men that the very same conservative movement claims to want to protect from an anti-male and feminist run establishment.
This desperation and willingness to overlook serious issues paints the conservative movement as both morally bankrupt and desperate in equal measure.
Rather than building up its own leaders and heroes that adhere to genuine conservative values, the conservative movement is so eager to adopt any celebrity of note as a figure head that at this point Jimmy Savile himself could rise from the grave and all he would need to do in order to get a slot on numerous conservative talk shows would be to question some small part of the official Covid narrative.
The second observation to make about the conservative movement’s embrace of men like Tate and Brand is just how focused the conservative movement is on monetary gain.
Tate and Brand have been big talking points in both the press and the mainstream media as a whole, to the point where some days these men have completely dominated both newsfeeds and discussion on social networks. And that’s an opportunity that the conservative movement simply can’t pass up.
At this point leading conservative pundits are so quick to insert their tongues as far as possible up the bottom of any man who currently dominates the newsfeeds that it’s quite nauseating! A desperate rush then ensues as leading conservative pundits all fall over themselves to praise and court the man in the media spotlight.
With each conservative pundit racing to produce the most cringe worthy video laying out a defence for the man in question – often wilfully ignoring all evidence and waving away all past indiscretions that show that the man in question is not in fact a “conservative” in any way.
This is all done out of desperation for money. Because every conservative pundit wants Tate, Brand, or whoever is the media sensation of the day, to appear on their show, so they can make as much bank as possible whilst the story is hot.
Imagine, Brand breaks his silence and offers his first exclusive interview to one lucky conservative pundit who streams it all live on Twitter, [Tucker Carlson] think of the views, think of the advertising revenue, think of the donations! The conservative movement at this point is little more than a business – and a business that has a bizarre symbiotic relationship with the very same mainstream media that it decries.
Whilst the conservative movement publicly lambasts the mainstream media, it will at the same time feed off the stories pumped out by the mainstream media, amplifying the noise around certain individuals and attempting to make financial capital off those individuals regardless of the moral issues involved.
The media then in turn runs further stories “exposing” the conservative movement’s support for the individuals the media has been attacking, creating a set of conditions beneficial to both sides – almost as if they are both in on it together, as if the conservative movement and the media are two sides of the same coin.
My final observation about the conservative movement is the most damning! The conservative movement will go to bat for men like Tate and Brand because the conservative movement is filled with cowards. Let’s be honest; Tate and Brand are easy men to defend, both have social media accounts followed by millions, both are independently wealthy, both have clout, and neither of those men have ever really challenged the fundamental principles of the anti-White system.
By supporting Brand or Tate, you won’t be called a racist, you won’t be called homophobic, you won’t see your bank account closed, or be kicked off Twitter. Supporting Brand and Tate is safe, and in many ways, simply creates meaningless noise for entertainment purposes.
This is a way for those within the conservative movement to claim that they are challenging the system, but they are not! You see, if the conservative movement really wished to challenge the system, they wouldn’t be fighting for the rights of two millionaires who both by their own admission have used their wealth and power to treat women appallingly, and in the case of Tate; men too.
If the conservative movement really wanted to challenge the establishment it would using its power and wealth to stand up for ordinary people who are being jailed under the Government’s increasingly draconian hate speech laws – something that the mainstream media eagerly endorse.
Earlier this year nationalist podcaster and radio host Sven Longshanks, AKA, James Allchurch, was jailed for two and half years for simply saying words k for having an opinion that contradicts the state’s position on multiculturalism and immigration. James never advocated for violence, never endorsed terrorism and not a single member of any ethnic minority community complained about James’s podcasts.
Yet he was found guilty of speech crimes and is currently serving his sentence in a Category B prison. Had James burgled a house, robbed a pensioner or committed a sexual offence he would have received a lesser sentence, most likely avoiding jail altogether.
Yet not a single one of the conservative pundits that are falling over themselves to defend Tate and Brand uttered a peep about James or the sentence he was handed. This is because the conservative movement not only lacks morals, but is also riddled with cowardice.
The conservative movement is never going to push back against the establishment in any meaningful way. In fact, by ignoring the establishment’s persecution of those who speak out about racial issues or demographic change, the conservative movement is actually aiding the establishment and using its power and money to drown out the voices that do speak out against this genuine political persecution.
Whether Brand or Tate are in fact guilty of any crimes remains to be seen – and I for one believe both men deserve a fair trial.
However, the fate of those men does not affect the well-being or the rights of the British people. What does affect the well-being and rights of ordinary Britons is the increasing number of people who are persecuted each year under the ever-growing umbrella of speech and thought crimes that both the British political establishment and mainstream media eagerly endorse.
Until the conservative movement decides to address such genuine issues, they will remain nothing more than a morally bankrupt circus that diverts attention away from genuine causes and focuses on defending rich and famous individuals for mutual financial gain.
However the delicious irony is; that eventually, as the state expands its crack down on freedom of speech, the conservative pundits who have buried their heads in the sand and wilfully ignored far more pressing issues of freedom of speech and civil liberties will eventually end up being dragged from their homes too for over stepping some invisible line that constantly moves toward the Left. At which point the only thing left for me to say, will be, “I told you so”!
[13:44]
END
============================================
Odysee Comments
(Comments as of 10/3/2023 = 98)
Open Borders for Israel
10 days ago
$5.00
Spot on as always Mark… also cuckservatives nearly all support mass immigration, miscegenation, homosexuality and every other degenerate flavour of the day cause – they are just cultural Marxists 5 years behind… also whilst they deny whites any sense of ethnocentrism, they are all fervent Zionists and support blood and soil ethnonationalism and ethnocentrism for Jews…
41
3
Hide replies
renunciate
10 days ago
I think they’re just cowards, tbh. Too afraid to take a strong position on anything.
11
1
Hide replies
NaInOa13
10 days ago
playing “underdog” to get more of that donation/PAC money…
4
0
@MilosM.
10 days ago
I must heavily disagree on that. at worst, they are afraid to take strong position at anything, like user below said. But you’d probably find plenty of those who vehemently oppose all of those.
3
15
Hide replies
@MilosM.
9 days ago
I am conservative.
1
1
Hide replies
Sir Leon
9 days ago
You are a disgrace for humanity…
0
3
Hide replies
@MilosM.
8 days ago
i hope bolshevik shekel money is good to you.
0
1
Hide replies
Sir Leon
7 days ago
Conservatism has failed the White race, either become a hardened National Socialist or be a Zio-Liberal Tranny.
0
2
Hide replies
@MilosM.
7 days ago
that’s stupid. National socialism is delusional. White people are better than that. It failed more white race than conservatism itself (National Socialism being a form of conservatism though)
0
1
Peak Aussieman
10 days ago
“Conservatism” will go down as a bigger grift then Progressivism has been. At least the Progs, they actually genuinely believe their stupid crap they spew. The “Conservative” talking-head class have been the premier con-artists for decades.
20
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
well I hope not. because we would have nothing left then.
1
9
Hide replies
@Vivec
10 days ago
There is something else but people were taught to hate it and reject it.
11
0
Hide replies
Mike Forester
8 days ago
Something like a … can’t put my finger right to it … a … kind of … THIRD political position maybe.
2
0
TheCeltDenise
10 days ago
I don’t care about Brand. He’s a mongrel pajeet mutant. But who would defend TATE?
21
1
Hide replies
@vettekid407
10 days ago
for real?? I knew he wasn’t white but no clue of his actual background
10
3
Hide replies
TheCeltDenise
10 days ago
Brand is half White, half rape monkey pajeet. ALL pajeets are rape monkey pervs.
9
0
Hide replies
@markantonynosferatu
10 days ago
Where did you see that info? Both his parents are white, there are photographs of both of them available.
3
0
Hide replies
Kanketsu
4 days ago(edited)
I don’t know for certain what brand is, but he’s clearly not British, and that beady dead eyed stare he has looks pajeet to me.
No Thoughts Barred
10 days ago(edited)
Conservatism has conserved.. what exactly? At this point it’s a hollow ideology used to stop disillusioned men embracing the third position. Conservatism, like liberalism, only works in a homogeneous society. I think it’s a good measure of intelligence to see who continues down the dead end path of conservatism and who embraces “radical” politics.
16
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
I still cling to conservatism because I see no other option. conservatism should be better than this what we have. At least you cannot call Tories or Republicans as conservatives. Such term would be so unappliable to them.
3
9
Hide replies
@Vivec
10 days ago
National socialism, its the natural counter to communism. You’re well aware of that but dont want to take the leap judging from past discussions in the streams. Hopefully you change your mind on the topic.
8
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
national socialism, with the key word socialism,will never be part of my mantra. Because of people who know nothing and feel less.
0
1
Hide replies
@Vivec
10 days ago
You are still fixated on the socialism part without understanding the difference. I suggest looking into documentaries of what was done at the time to bring people out of poverty (actual germans not just some random human that crossed the border). Its like night and day.
2
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
socialism is all over the same. don’t tell me it’s not. Fight for the working class, but that doesn’t make you socialist. I am coming from a former socialist country and for all its virtues, I really wouldn’t live there.
0
2
Hide replies
@Vivec
10 days ago
It wasnt the same under a proper leadership, look at what they accomplished in a few years. Nothing will change your mind on the issue but know there is something out there, conservatism isnt the way out of this situation.
2
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
9 days ago(edited)
ah, protecting your society against lgbt propaganda, eradicating feminism completely, employ indigenous people and pay them properly (who will have to work), stop migration and immigration (at least from 3rd world; read: non-European countries), allow people of either Christian or pagan faith to practice their religion undisturbed, having successful industrial organization that thrives on profit, allow people to have medical treatment for free (unless is some more complex procedure they have to pay), allow freedom of speech where no one should be untouchable, allow people to become modestly rich, but not too rich (cuz no one who is too rich reached there honestly).
All these I am completely in.
1
0
Hide replies
@Vivec
9 days ago
Good summary, if you’d like to find a name for it that doesnt remind you of communism go right ahead. If you agree with what they’ve done its good enough for me we have similar goals.
1
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
9 days ago
well I imagine all these were a very thing in period 70 or more years ago. I doubt it was communist. I mean, I certainly am no reminded of communism in the first place.
No Thoughts Barred
9 days ago(edited)
Think of it as Social Nationalism. If NS were a Marxist ideology then the left leaning aspects of the party wouldn’t have been purged in the night of the long knives. There was even a term used to distinguish National Socialists who were previously communists from regular National Socialists, “beefsteak nazi”. The only people who were oppressed under NS were Marxists/communists and later on Jews. Safe to assume you’re neither of those so you wouldn’t have to worry. I recall you have some interesting takes on China, try to view what they’re doing through an NS lens and you’ll find some similarities. CCP is a poor man’s NSDAP with Marxism mixed in.
2
0
@markantonynosferatu
10 days ago
European nationalism is more conservative than conservatism. How is conservatism even an option, they are complete losers, and that is what they will always be allowed to be by their masters.
6
0
Sir Leon
9 days ago
Conservatism has conserved ‘Jewish Hyper-Capitalism’, ‘Atomizing Individualism’, and ‘Worldwide Zionism’.
4
0
hitlers nest
10 days ago
Hail \0
11
0
Hide replies
@vettekid407
10 days ago
hail 🙋♂️
7
0
Hide replies
linuxHelpTipsUK
10 days ago
o/
linuxHelpTipsUK
10 days ago
o/
renunciate
10 days ago
Are Brand & Tate actually conservatives or are they just in place to discredit people that object to the current things? I’ve certainly never identified with either of them. One reminds me of a loser hippy chick I knew in high school who is now a loser adult gaming the system, the other reminds me of a two bit scumbag that wears their shirt unbuttoned a little too far and thinks Las Vegas is classy. Lol. Yuck.
8
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
10 days ago
Except Kanye actually approached one of the BIG issues.
14
3
Hide replies
Asadafa
10 days ago
hear, hear
2
0
linuxHelpTipsUK
10 days ago
That ‘issue’ had a big nose lol.
2
0
renunciate
10 days ago
True, Kanye did share more truth and he also got punished harder. I wonder if his current “wife” was hush money?
2
0
@nboeger
10 days ago
He’s a degenerate and always was. The only reason he is on our talking points is because they have become popular and he likes to be seen as a “rebel”. It’s all vain and faggie.
7
0
EmptyLife
10 days ago(edited)
They are coming for him because he started questioning the establishment. Whatever he may have done I’m more concerned about the British government trying to influence private companies to cancel people.
6
0
Hide replies
No Thoughts Barred
10 days ago(edited)
Yeah I don’t like media witch hunts. If you have a crime to report go to the police, not the media. This isn’t a defense of Brand, I hate snakes like him.
9
0
King Tut
8 days ago
Andrew Tate is a lowlife scumbag that not only pimps white girls, but also manipulates and scams the lonely and desperate men so he can buy his Bugattis. i hope he rots in Romanian prison forever.
4
0
Save the white race
10 days ago
I’m no fan of Brands and his leftist globalist anti-capitalist anti-white politics certainly doesn’t align with mine but then neither does that despicable Tory woman who tried to cancel and stop him earning money.
I hate those that push cancel culture and those behind the online data bill. whether it be against good people like Mark and Laura or Brand.
Sod that Tate though.
5
1
Hide replies
linuxHelpTipsUK
10 days ago
There all in bed with each other….
1
0
Mike Forester
10 days ago
When I heard the news about Brand I thought: Well, well, well. Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy, eh? A spoiled rotten, champagne leftist trust fond brat gets taken down because of sexytime offences during his BBC tenure. After what this prick has done to you, Mark, in the past, I’d file that under “poetic justice” and lean back.
4
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
What Russell did to Mark?
0
4
Hide replies
Mike Forester
9 days ago
Many years ago when Mark was active for the BNP (or even earlier) Brand did a TV report “exposing” his racisms and that Mark’s a very bad geezer ‘n stuff. He did it of course in the ambush journo way lying that he would hear the other side of the argument. It aired on national TV as far as I know.
3
0
Mike Forester
9 days ago
After looking around I found the hit piece on Bitchute. The “doco” is called “Nazi boy” from 2002:
3
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
9 days ago
i saw that, but I saw nothing but a friendly chat between the two. actually I think all Nazi and “bad” was added without Brand’s input. Even Mark admitted once they had a good time.
1
0
Hide replies
Mike Forester
8 days ago
Then you didn’t watch it until the end. Yeah, they had a good time, until Brand tried to pull a “got’cha” on him with the goal to publicly embarrass Mark as head of the youth branch of BNP.
@Koko
10 days ago
Gatekeepers get the pit along with the lowly talking heads that prop them all up..
4
0
Moon Man’s Dad
10 days ago(edited)
Great video, but I think the reason that Tommy Robinson defended Tate despite him converting to Islam, has more to do with the fact that Hope not Hate were the ones behind the attack. They were offering 50,000 to any women that would come out against Tate. Having been a victim of Hope not Hate himself and knowing Tate before they both became famous, Tommy felt that he had to defend him. (He explains all this on the Fresh and Fit show)
(Also explains how he is a proud Zionist and paid for his own trip to Israel, they don’t even need to pay him)
Tommy goes on to say that he was extremely disappointed when Tate converted, having promoted him to his sons, but they are still part of a privet WhatsApp chat for guys that grew up in Luton.
So it seems his loyalty to Tate has blinded him from reality, as Tate has admitted he likes to strangle women during sex and boasted of making all his money by being Mr 50% a Digital Pimp.
Personally I hate them both, but I thought I would just let you guys know about their real life connections.
4
0
Hide replies
@MilosM.
10 days ago
Tommy is strange fella to me. He is supposed to be some Jewish shill yet gets all sorts of accusations thrown at him. Or there is something I don’t know? And somehow I think he would hate the likes of me, despite that my aversion toward muslims surpasses the one toward Jews. for half an inch.
0
3
Sir Leon
9 days ago
Andrew Tate and it’s clique (I call it Tateism) is not a positive social trend for traditionalists, conservatives, and especially national socialists. To classify it as “anti-feminist” is misleading. The worldview pushed by Tate is essentially ghetto philosophy (no surprise given his heritage), which conceives of man’s purpose in society as an individualistic struggle against other men to accrue the most “paper, bling, and bitches”. There is nothing here resembling family values, patriarchy (in the true sense: rule of fathers), nation, race, or God. It is nothing new either: Rappers have been putting out an identical message for decades.
If feminism is defined as opposition to patriarchy, then Tateism is just another strand of feminism, albeit a macho version. It never actually denies the precepts of the sexual revolution; it merely offers a method whereby men can enjoy its fruits.
In short, Tateism is just what Pope Pius XI predicted: That, when “female liberation” is achieved, and women are taken from their positions as mothers and homemakers, they will simply become the sex toys of men. Tateism is not anti-feminist, it is simply the logical conclusion of feminism.
3
0
Rev. James Costello
10 days ago
Well said.
3
0
Moon Man’s Dad
10 days ago(edited)
Expert analysis as usual. Tate is the physical manifestation of anti-conservatism, a mixed race sexual deviant, who rises well above his station, becoming a multi-millionaire by exploiting women and sad lonely men. Only to turn around and become a Muslim, whilst maintaining his inflated ego. The irony is that having a prideful heart and a belief that one’s good fortune is a result of their hard work, not the divine providence of God is one of the most deadly sins in Islam, yet that’s Tate’s entire personality…
4
1
Hide replies
Moon Man’s Dad
10 days ago
So it’s doubly ironic.
@HerrNordstorm
9 days ago
Russel Brand is f..king scum, I hope they hang him by his balls. I saw what he did to Mark Collett and i will never forgive that scum, ever.
Another zog-puppet, f-ck him.
2
2
RyaHiSs
10 days ago
Hi Mark, have you ever heard of KiwiFarms and Josh Moon? I watched your previous video about off-com and the concerns for freedom online. Have you ever thought about discussing freedom of speech online with him?
3
3
Hide replies
Sir Leon
9 days ago
That is a very interesting question, but I doubt it will happen. If Null associates with Ethno-Nats like Mark, he could be in trouble legally.
Eh
10 days ago
Good video. I thought you may have had an axe to grind re your previous posts. This is more thought out. Thank you.
You know it’s hypocritical of you to criticise “conservatives” for adopting online personalities for their benefit. You did exactly the same thing – will keep it to Goddard and Mitchell as they left in a somewhat acrimonious way.
Nothing against them, but we know they are both thick and seemingly just got involved because you sucked them in – which is fair enough.
The former is a thick egotist who never really understood what you stand for and the consequences involved, then tried to distance himself from you in a cowardly way. Nowadays he shouts at black people, saying they’re racist.
The latter – also very thick. He left or got kicked out literally because of some bird. Couldn’t stop harassing her when it didn’t work out.
I can understand why you used them to grow your movement, but you shouldn’t criticise other movements who do exactly the same thing.
2
0
@Prussnblk
10 days ago
That video of Brand following you around was just weird
2
0
Matt Hammond
10 days ago
Last night I had a dream where I actually met Mark. I had been invited to some house and I was in some living room talking to him. I was babbling on and on and he was just listening and nodding. I was trying my best to make a good impression and knew that I shouldn’t outstay my welcome. Various people were sitting on the couch and coming and going. Family members and associates I guessed. I ended by shaking his hand which became a prolonged handshake but not awkward and telling him how much I admire him and his work. It was very vivid. One of those dreams you have when you oversleep beyond your normal waking time.
3
3
Hide replies
No Thoughts Barred
10 days ago(edited)
Interesting. Recently I had a dream (nightmare) where my sister got in a taxi and it was blew up by a Muslim. I think it was Jung who said that dreams represent the unconscious mind. I guess both the good and bad in our lives manifests while we sleep.
1
0
@nótt
10 days ago
Years ago I met Hitler in a dream. It was great.
1
0
@NormalStyleCrew
7 days ago
‘ello, luv
1
0
@david_smith
8 days ago
I’m not racist, but what species is Brand?
1
0
@tonyellis154
9 days ago
I detect a lot of cynicism Mark.
its a big stretch from drunken junkie sexual predator, to Saville’s psychopathic child molestations and child trafficking.
We certainly can’t agree with everyone and everything, but I’m saddened to see Christian values thrown out the window by Mark with redemptionf being a fundamental underlying principle. If someone is speaking truth to 6.5 million people, that is something we should promote and somehow reinforce and spread the message.
what Brands views
on immigration are now I don’t know, perhaps we should use his platforms to challenge him, lets see if he’s prepared to stand up for the oppressed, like Longshanks and Graham Phillips?
0
1
Defaced from Humanity
10 days ago
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Ever heard that? If you’re tied up in the immorality of someone’s past life just to throw away the attack against the truth, then what chance have we do win in this information war?
Obviously, I am not in favor of what these men have done, but I don’t want people doing better than me to lose their independence. Because if they can lose their independence against the system, then someone like me, much lower in the economic chain, stands absolutely no chance.
When you’re in a war, moral purism never wins the battles in an immortal society.
3
2
Hide replies
Defaced from Humanity
10 days ago
Read Sodom and Gomorrah. Did purist morality of man win? NO.
Wake up and realize the war you’re in isn’t for the morality of a single man. It’s a battle between Satan and God. Morality will always be the casualty.
0
2
@MilosM.
10 days ago(edited)
it’s not outrageous that (some) conservatives hurl to support either Russell or Tate. Anyone who had about unpopular for the establishment takes got their seat in Convo circles. I’ve already heard some saying “thank God for Tuckers, Musks, Shapiros, Rogans, Brands, Jones etc. But I wouldn’t smear conservatives because of that. Even Ye for a period of time is seen as an idol for white nationalists. I would be more concerned if lefties dig these people too.
Mark, you should goad Russell to join PA. It seems dark days are way pass him.
1
5
@SCrusader
1 day ago
The biggest threats White people face, are traitors, and cowards.
Tony
5 days ago
Brand-Tate are conservative of the status quo : incels , conspiracy lunacy , Covid conjecture, pick up culture and dead internet proliferation.
@paxroma
7 days ago
Brand and Tate are a couple of scumbags end of.
@NormalStyleCrew
8 days ago(edited)
do battlefield earth on next film club. have mike enoch on to replace laura since she already hates it
Htrac
8 days ago
Brand is not a conservative, he’s a left wing hippy who said things against big pharma and the establishment (similar to Piers Corbyn). Russell Brand is not Andrew Tate and they shouldn’t be conflated.
But yeah, conservatives are cucks. There is also nothing new about Russell Brand being a sex pest, it’s been known for 20 years. Nobody cared when he was the darling of the left. It’s clear why it’s suddenly coming out now, and I am not defending him by saying that, I just think media and government overreach to cancel people is always wrong, whoever the target.
Brand has most likely done bad things and he should be punished for that (before now), but he should still be entitled to innocent until proven guilty. This trial by media and deplatforming or demonetising despite not breaking any laws or the platform rules, with MPs writing to companies to say he should be removed or demonetised, is ridiculous and not good for anyone. Speaking out against that is not speaking in support of Russell Brand – this kind of censorship and authoritarianism is not good for any of us.
I know you have beef with Brand because of that documentary he did about you when you were younger, which was admittedly a horrible way to smear you (although with hindsight you actually came out of it looking very good, basically predicting everything).
With Andrew Tate, as far as I know, not even conservatives support him. He’s popular with a certain misogynistic young male demographic, but generally hated by most prominent conservatives and everybody further right.
Less
White Nationalist (Balk Right)
9 days ago
21 years have passed and Britain has changed a great deal, since your interview with Brand. You have stayed on message with the same vision. He, not being intellectually honest, has fallen. I know that most will never allow themselves to self actualized and see if their logic and reason is off. Certainly, I do not expect the intellectually dishonest Brand to revisit his interview with you, since he would experience the, “I told you so.” Being a Balkanist, I don’t help fund a great deal of people that be not part of the Balk Right, since I do not believe there’s a political solution. I’ve always given to you because of your iron will and not kowtowing.
Major Dolby’s Cat
9 days ago
Only If you’ve still got a platform to say “I told you so” Mark. The way it’s all going arse about face, only the far left will be heard and quite frankly that’s such an horrific thought.
Avalon
10 days ago
It’s hard work being right 👍
linuxHelpTipsUK
10 days ago(edited)
One’s a sex pest the other ALSO a sex pest but a mongrel. stupid freemason silly rituals they do! This is clearly a psyop as well. muh andrew tate, muh balloon, muh maui, muh brandon and now muh brand. Remember there ALL in bed with each other! Celebs a-like are all controlled opposite.
MTaylor
10 days ago
Brand is like Trump. Not perfect, but he gets the sheep to think about things they otherwise wouldn’t
Hide replies
@Tyrnasra
9 days ago
And he deliberately misleads them, like Trump, and behaves as a pied piper.
Wibble
10 days ago
WotW released this re Tait…
Yet still some will defend him, just as they defend Scott Ritter, a serial paedophile, arrested twice, on over 20 counts of soliciting sex from under age girls, including sending them videos of himself masturbating…sadly for him one of the girls was an undercover cop and he had a short spell in prison, but still people have him on their streams and defend him constantly, saying things like “He was entrapped!” not a care about his crimes, just how he was caught…
My personal thoughts on Brand are, if the accusers are granted anonymity, why not the accused, at least until/if found guilty of any crimes….?
And apparently this whole campaign against Brand has been going on for over 4 years, and the average payment to the accusers is £60 to £100k….
The whole thing is very clearly manufactured by the media…not saying there’s no truth in the allegations…but that is all they are right now, allegations….
0
0
==========================
See Also
Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT
Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript
Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT
Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript
============================================
PDF Download
Total words in transcript = 2,106
- Total words in post = 6,529
- Total images = xx
- Total A4 pages = xxx
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)
Version History
Version 5:
Version 4:
Version 3:
Version 2: Thu, Oct 5, 2023 — Added images.
Version 1: Tue, Oct 3, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (98).