[Patrick Grimm wrote extensively during 2007 to 2009 exposing and warning the world about the dangers and machinations of organized jewry and its nation wrecking activities.
In a speech given at a conference he discusses the total hypocrisy of organized jewry as it accuses others of being “extremist”, when it has demonstrated by its actions throughout history to be the most blood thirsty rabid extremist the world has ever seen! Grimm recounts how he came to the realization that:
“… it [organized jewry] was the single largest threat to our freedoms and to our sovereignty”
— KATANA.]
_______________________
Patrick Grimm
What is Extremism?
Oct 2007
Here is the text of the speech I delivered on Sunday, October 14th [2007] at the No More Wars For IsraelConference in Orange County, California. This is not a word-for-word rendition of that talk since some editing, additions and deletions were made to the text. The ideas contained herein are even more relevant now than when I penned them, mainly, because the ugly face of the Zionist jewish criminal network, the ADL came out in force to violate our civil rights and our First Amendment freedoms. Working with local law enforcement, B’nai B’rith and their shylock lackeys lied (what a shock!) and tried to label our gathering as an “extremist event” that was linked up with “terrorism.” Thanks to this nefariousness, the Marriot Hotel violated the terms of our contract and we were forced to hold the conference in other facilities. But the jews lost in the end, because the conference was an overwhelming success. Of course the Antsy Defecation League (thanks Birdman) cannot abide the truth, because they do the work of criminal Judaism. I would expect nothing less from the agents of the Zionist monster. Enjoy this talk.
— Patrick Grimm
Ladies and gentlemen, fellow speakers and guests. It is an honor and a privilege to be here at the No More Wars For Israel Conference in sunny southern California. I was excited when Mark Glenn invited me to attend and speak to all the accomplished writers, academics and great patriots I see before me today.
I must say I was quite amused to see the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith’s take on this gathering, this meeting which discusses both the role of Israel in determining America’s foreign policy and the role of what I have coined as “Big jewry” in influencing both the United States and the rest of the world. The ADL, without hesitation and without qualification describes the No More Wars For Israel Conference as an “Anti-Semitic conference organized by Mark Glenn of the Crescent and Cross Web site.” [1]
Now this is hardly surprising, but I find it humorous nevertheless. I’m quite sure that as I speak, the ADL and its overbearing President Abraham Foxman are literally in a panic mode, trying to do damage control and cursing in Yiddish as millions in America and around the world wake up to the reality of what the jewish supremacists are doing to manipulate them, lie to them and to brainwash them in their controlled media outlets. But thank God for the internet, I say, and that the benighted are slowly transforming into the enlightened on the jewish Question. Thank God for all of you and for many more like you who were not able to attend this gathering.
[Here, Canadian Prof. Phillipe J. Rushton at the Amren Conference 2000, reports on his travels to South Africa to find out for himself whether studies showing that Africans have an average IQ of 70, is true or not.
The very idea that there are differences in intelligence between the races has been made into a taboo topic by organized jewry, turning commonsense on its head and forcing people to believe nonsense about “racial equality”. One main purposes why organized jewry pushes this propaganda lie about the “equality of races” is to remove objections from White people to the flooding of their society with masses of low IQ blacks and browns. This is why rare academics, like Rushton, who tell the truth about racial differences are vilified in our jewish controlled media — KATANA.]
[As of Sep 2019, video removed from YouTube for violating its policy on “hate speech“. To find an alternative upload do a search on YouTube or Bitchute for “Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70“]
YouTube Description
An except from Prof. J. Philippe Rushton’s speech given at the Fourth American Renaissance Conference in 2000.
Ranging from original IQ testing in the classrooms of South African universities to the study of anatomy, Rushton once more details racial differences and explains why they are important. His latest research supports the findings that the average African IQ is 70.
_________________________
Do Africans Really
Have an IQ of 70?
Published on Apr 14, 2013
TRANSCRIPT
(12:25 mins)
[00:00]
Thank you very much. It’s a pleasure to be here again. The first slide is actually a postcard from South Africa, which I was very fortunate to be able to visit, about a year and a half ago. The New South Africa. It is a fascinating country. When you arrive in Johannesburg, as I did, you see a very modern skyline. In fact, it’s very undifferentiated from any American city, or Canadian city.
The roads are big super highways and the motor cars are modern. Even the people on the streets and driving the cars, for the most part are indistinguishable from North America.
On the other hand, South Africa is a city of, a country of contrasts, and there’s a great deal of traditional society as well.
And the reason I was in South Africa, is, because of this particular chart which summarizes IQ scores that Professor Richard Lynn alluded to in his talk, based on his review, which was published in 1991.
East Asians, both here in the United States and Canada, as well as in their home continents, as Chinese, Japanese and Koreans, average a slightly higher IQ than do White people. Now the average I have there is 106. Sometimes you see the average a little bit lower, around 103. Whites average about 100. A few estimates may place it a little bit higher and say 103. Black Americans average about 85. And again blacks in Canada, or Britain, or in the Caribbean, average around 85, to maybe slightly higher, up as high as 90.
[ John Friend of The Realist Report interviews German-Canadian activist Monika Schaefer on her awakening to the destructive activities of organized jewry and its ongoing plan of genocide against Whites. Having spent her entire adult life involved in various environmental causes it was only in the last few years that she became aware that 9/11 was an “inside job” carried out by organized jewry.
One thing led to another, and she then became aware of revisionism and that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical hoax perpetrated by the usual suspects against Germans in particular and Whites in general.
She went public with her views in June 2016 with the release of a short video titled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Despite being a prominent, well-respected individual of long-standing in the “Gingerbread Town” of Jasper, Alberta, she has faced social ostracism and a process of “ritual defamation” from leading members of the community — KATANA.]
_________________________
The Realist Report
On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Monika Schaefer, a courageous activist and truth-seeker openly exposing the fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative and other extremely controversial topics. Monika’s brother, Alfred, was recently a guest on The Realist Report.
In this podcast, Monika and I discuss her background, education, and upbringing before moving on to address her awakening process to the lies endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the mainstream mass media, Hollywood, modern educational establishment and virtually all Western governments pertaining to the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII. Monika gives us her take on the fake “Holocaust” narrative and offers her perspective on Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany.
We also address a number of other important topics in this podcast, including the reality of Jewish power and influence in the Western world, the systematic promotion of policies designed to genocide the White race, 9/11 and the “Global War on Terror,” and related matters.
John: All right folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these podcasts, as well as other radio broadcasts I’ve participated in. You can also find all of my articles and blog posts, a contact page with my personal email address, my Twitter feed — which is embedded on the right hand side of the website, and all sorts of other useful information and links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real paper. And I also contribute to the Barnes Review, a bi-monthly history magazine, affiliated with American Free Press. Both publications are worth subscribing to and I highly encourage listeners to do so, if they are not already. Visit American Free Press dot net and Barnes Review dot org, for more details.
All right, with that said, I’d like to introduce my special guest this evening. Monika Schaefer is joining us for the very first time. Monika is a courageous activist and truth seeker who has openly and quite publicly challenged a number of taboo topics in modern Western society, including the fake jewish “Holocaust” narrative, which is endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the educational, media and political establishment, here in the West.
Monika, thank you so much for joining me! How are you this evening?
Monika:Hello John! Thank you so much for having me on! And I am doing very well, thank you, very much. And I honestly thank you for all the good work you do! Yeah, I’ve been listening to your podcasts for a while and reading some of your articles. And I think you do excellent work!
John: Thank you very much, I really appreciate it. And, you know, it’s funny I feel like I know you although we’ve never actually spoken. Maybe it’s, because I’ve interviewed your brother Alfred a couple times now, here on The Realist Report? And I’ve seen some of your video, a couple which we’ll talk about in this podcast. Yes, but I don’t know, I just have this strange feeling that somehow we know each other but, I know we actually don’t. So, it’s great for you to finally be here and, you know, we can kind of get to know each other in real life I guess, or at least over the Internet, as best we can.
Monika:Yes, and I had that sensation too! Yes, that’s right, just from listening to your talk with a number of people and so, it does feel like we know each other probably, because we’re on the same page on a lot of these issues, I think.
John: Yes, I think so. And your brother’s always great talking to. I actually recently interviewed him just a couple of weeks ago. And we dealt with a number of topics that I’m sure we’ll be getting into, in this podcast. So I guess, just to get started, could you tell us a little bit about your background, your education and your upbringing. And perhaps, maybe your professional experience, if you feel that is relevant. Let’s kind of start there, just kind of introduce yourself, please.
[04:27]
Monika: Sure. I grew up in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and my parents came from Germany in the early 50’s. And I was born in 1959, the fourth in a family of five children. And we grew up in a very, I would say, traditional German household, you know, the way we celebrated certain times of year, in a very German style. Like Christmas we had the real candles on the tree and that kind of thing.
And something that I really feel, that affected us deeply was our parents’ love of nature. Even though we grew up in the city we were very, very connected to the natural world. We had a huge vegetable garden always, and we put great value on going for walks, like as a family. We would go for walks in the river valley and just really appreciate nature. That went very, very deep.
Transcripts of Red Ice Radio’s interview are here: Part I and Part II
And yeah, as I was growing up, learning in school, the usual things that we were learning in those days, in the sixties and seventies. And I had, like Germar Rudolf — and you interviewed him recently — and he talks about his very developed sense of justice. I could relate to that when he spoke of that. I feel that applies to me, too. I started to become an activist in environmental things and social justice things, very, very early in my life. Like during my teen years. And then all through my adult life I was very much an activist. And it was always on environmental things and also peace issues.
[Here, YouTube activist, Ayan Spring2, makes a thoughtful demand for supporters of Whites to really support the movement by donating, god forbid, … actual money! As he points out, any successful movement requires full-time activists, and they can’t live off fresh air!
As a movement we need to solve the problems of getting people to contribute, whether they are issues of motivation, organization, or technology.
So, people should show their support through deeds, either by volunteering their time and effort and/or by financially contributing to this historic battle of Whites against jewish tyranny — KATANA.]
So I’m a little bit excited at the moment and also a little bit sad at the moment, for very different reasons. Why am I excited? I’m excited, because I can see that the Daily Stormer has finally, finally, finally raised some money! For with it’s campaign to raise donations for the legal fight against the Jews, in the upcoming battle.
So I’m really, really happy about this. This is something which I’ve been talking about for a long time. I even made an entire video about it. Quite a lengthy video about it called, “Pepe will destroy the information industry”. Unfortunately this was taken down from YouTube and I reloaded it and then they took it down again, straight away!
But this has been a question which has been in the back of my mind for a long time. If you can’t fund the world’s most successful and most radical White Nationalist website, then how is White Nationalism going to succeed?
[Patrick Grimm wrote extensively during 2007 to 2009 exposing and warning the world about the dangers and machinations of organized jewry and its nation wrecking activities.
Here he explores the unbelievable deceit and hypocrisy of organized jewry as it projects, through its control over the media, the image of being a paragon of virtue and innocence, unjustly persecuted, when organized jewry is, in actual fact, the very opposite, the greatest mass murderer of the 20th century, and now beyond — KATANA.]
_______________________
Patrick Grimm
Poor-Little-Meees!
2007
People of Jewish heritage and Jewish ethnicity have been the greatest killers of the twentieth century.
Ingest this trenchant article that confirms it, then get back to me as fast as your fingers can deliver you. But despite this reality, the Nazi regime and all its “anti-Semitic” antics are purportedly the only thing untoward that occurred in the last hundred years. Yet despite the fact, or perhaps because of the fact that Jews ran history’s most egregious killing mills and slaughter factories, the historical record is generally silent about Jewish wrongs, but very vocal about supposed wrongs done unto Jews. They are history’s “Poor-Little-Meeeeeees” and nothing they are involved in is anything short of angelic, golden, high-minded, beneficent, godly (if godly is the right word for a people who are majority atheistic), enlightened, ennobling and selfless, not to mention really, really intelligent.
[In this very informative two part audio interview (126 mins — Parts I & II) Henrik Palmgren talks with the well known revisionist Germar Rudolf. We learn of Germar’s reluctant inquiry into the issue of the Third Reich and the taboo subject of the so-called “Holocaust”. As a student of chemistry he ends up examining the chemical evidence, or lack of, for the alleged homicidal gas chambers. This leads him to conclude that it doesn’t exist and that the gas chambers are a product of Allied [jewish] black propaganda. Ultimately, he spent several years in German jails for daring to deny the existence of the “Holocaust” and where, against all normal legal practice: “The truth is no defense.“
He and Henrik go on to discuss the perilous demographic decline in birth rates among White countries, that will, if nothing is done, lead to disaster. Both the fraudulent “Holocaust” claims and the denial of White nationalism are interlinked in jewish propaganda, in that any claims for White self-determination are cast as something that leads directly back to the dreaded, “evil Nazis” and the “gas chambers“! — KATANA.]
Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to listen to the audio.
NOTE: You need to be a member of Red Ice to listen to Part II.
Published on Jul 29, 2016
Red Ice Radio Description
Germar Rudolf was born in Limburg, Germany. He studied chemistry at Bonn University, where he graduated in 1989 as a Diplom-Chemist, which is comparable to a U.S. PhD degree. From 1990-1993 he prepared a German PhD thesis at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in conjunction with the University of Stuttgart, Germany. Parallel to this and in his spare time, Rudolf prepared an expert report on chemical and technical questions of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz, The Rudolf Report. He is the founder of the small revisionist outlet, Castle Hill Publishers.
Mr. Rudolf joins us to share the story of his life’s work as a revisionist researcher and writer and the ostracizing and persecution he has endured for daring to tread into the controversial topic of the German holocaust. Germar talks about the process of awakening that led him to question the “official” version of holocaust history in his mid-20s, when he stumbled upon the notorious Leuchter Report while preparing an expert report on the chemical and technical questions of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and Birkenau for the trial of a “Holocaust denier.” We discuss the longstanding and brutal suppression of evidences that refute the cherished narrative of gas chambers used to systematically exterminate 6 million jews, and we look at the undeniable proof that the powers that be have been using this “miracle weapon” to psychologically trounce German and Western European identity. Then, Germar gives a straightforward definition of a “revisionist,” underscoring that in the case of the “Holocaust“, the general issues of persecution and unjust treatment of Jews is not denied. He highlights some of the chemical, structural and biological evidence that points to a starkly contrasting story than what has been painted throughout 70+ years of political propagandizing. Germar also touches on the thought crimes that sent him to prison for 44 months and the blatant lawlessness of court proceedings he’s witnessed, and he gives a rundown of his latest book, Resistance is Obligatory.
In the members’ segment, Germar goes deeper into exposing free speech hijacking and human dignity suppression that is at the core of revisionist work. We consider the massive power structure upheaval that would need to occur in order for Western civilization at large to achieve a complete paradigm shift and accept the fact that we have been lied to and manipulated on so many levels concerning WWI/II. Then, we talk about the establishment’s grave fear of the rise of nationalism despite the recent terrorist attacks by hostile foreign invaders in Germany and France, and Germar gives a grim picture of the migration statistics for Europe, which is seeing many of its best and brightest indigenous populations fleeing the monster and taking up residence elsewhere. We discuss the most critical extinction level crisis that is plaguing Europe – the demographic decline of natives resulting from the shrinking birth rate. Germar emphasizes the financial implications of Europeans allowing themselves to be bred out, and we debate whether or not the government’s (dis)incentivizing having larger families is really the issue. We give some thought to the role of the 1960s sexual revolution, the advent of birth control, and the lost sense awareness that we live in a chain of generations that keeps the social order on course. At the end, we weigh up how the crisis the West is spawning many religious zealots and a rising core of radical traditionalist who may or may not be able to rescue the vanishing European civilization.
Henrik: Welcome back ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us here in the second hour. Always a pleasure to have you with us. We are speaking with Germar Rudolf, the, well, “thought criminal!” The enemy of the state, if you will. We’re talking about his work, his struggles as a revisionist, his persecution by government and the authorities for daring to do research and have an interest and a passion in history that very few others have.
Now, I’ve always been very interested in these kinds of areas, in these kinds of cases where there is intense pressure from authorities, from the judicial, or justice system, and to go after people that hold dissenting views. I think we should all, as you said, in the first segment, Germar, interest ourselves for those cases, to try to see what it is that they are really are actually covering up, if you will. But I think we’ll probably never get people in office, in, you know, official positions to recognize much of this work. They might just have to be, I don’t know, replaced by a younger crowd that are willing to listen. But it’s very difficult, because the pressure and the programming and the propaganda is so strong.
In fact, if we look at so-called, you know, “Holocaust education“, that has gotten more intense over the decades, I would say. But before we talk more about what happened at some of the camps, what the data say, what your findings point to, let me just ask you:
What do you think it would take for the scales to tip and for people to actually open their eyes and have a more curious approach to history and the kind of things that you’re focusing on?
And what would the consequences of something like this, be, if people started looking at this?
[In this very informative interview (100 mins ) Henrik Palmgren talks with a well known Swedish journalist/activist Ingrid Carlqvist. We learn how Ingrid has recently woken up to the central role of organized jewry in destroying Sweden through the pushing of the Third World invasion of Sweden.
Prior to this awakening she focused her attention on Muslims, i.e., the “effect” rather than the root cause.
Since her awakening she has even begun to question aspects of the “holy of hollies“, the “Holocaust” (or “Holohoax” as many of us like to call it). As a result, many people who have been supportive of her work have suddenly shown another face and have turned strongly against her — KATANA.]
Click on the above links, or copy the link into your browser to listen to the audio or watch the video.
Published on May 1, 2017
Red Ice TV Description
Ingrid Carlqvist worked in mainstream media for many years, before starting Dispatch International with Lars Hedegaard in 2012. She has been a writer for Gatestone Institute and co-hosts the popular Swedish podcast, Ingrid & Conrad.
Ingrid returns to Red Ice to discuss her experience as a journalist telling unpopular truths in Sweden. To begin, she tells us about how she set out to understand why Sweden had become multicultural. Ingrid quickly realized that it is nearly impossible to discuss Jewish influence, as most people – even those critical of Islam – are unwilling to venture into such controversial waters. We then discuss Barbara Spectre, an influential American Jew in Sweden who has called for the end of European civilization through mass immigration from the third world. Later, we discuss Holocaust revisionism, and how Ingrid’s willingness to question – not deny – this historical event has affected her journalism career.
Henrik: Hey boys and girls, welcome back. Thank you for tuning in. I’m Henrik Palmgren. This is Red Ice TV. You have also, of course, a radio version available of this show if you so prefer. Great to have you with us today. We have a special segment together with one of the co-hosts of Norse News which I definitely hope you have checked out by now.
We’re actually up in the third episode at this point., but we have Ingrid Carlqvist with us on the line today. And we’re going to talk a bit about some of the things have unfolded in the Swedish press over the last week, or so. She was basically drawn into a controversial issue of her raising some very important points when it comes to, you know, Swedish multiculturalism and what it is that we really are are faced and what it is that we’re battling in Sweden. You know, when it comes to the transformation of Swedish society. And it’s really important.
I also just want to mention this that, you know, Ingrid is a very, very talented journalist. I mean, she’s been, … She’s like a bloodhound, you know, she’s been digging into issues over the years and not let go. When she gets on a trail, she follows through and she catches her prey, so to speak. And in this case it’s really the same thing that has happened. So we were going to try to detail this today and try to outline for you exactly what it is that happened and the kind of chronology of this.
So, welcome to the show, Ingrid. Thank you so much for a coming on with us again.
Ingrid: Thank you so much Henrik! Thanks for having me.
Henrik: So tell the audience first what happened and how did this all of the begin for those who haven’t followed the Swedish press.
Ingrid: Well, it actually began, I think, we have to go back to February, when I had a speech in Gothenburg. Some people wanted me to come and speak about a book that I plan to write. And the working title of my book is, “From Sweden to Absurdistan” and I want to, you know, try to understand how did this happen. How did we go from 1965, when our Prime Minister said:
“We are so lucky in Sweden, because we are an homogenous country, not only according to the race. We are so lucky!”
And then ten years later, in 1975, the Swedish parliament decided that Sweden was not going to be a Swedish country anymore, but a multicultural one! And we’ve all seen what has happened since then, so that the focus of my work, what I want to find out is: How did this happen? How did we go in just ten years from a Prime Minister praising the homogeneity of Sweden to Parliament saying that Swedish is not good, we want to be a multicultural country?
And when I, you know, researched this subject I found out that it all started in October 1964 with an op-ed in one of the biggest Swedish newspapers called “Dagens Nyheter”, “The Daily News”. And it was written by a Jewish man called David Schwartz*. And he had come to Sweden in 1950, or so. He had been a prisoner in a concentration camp in Germany. And came to Sweden and started his life here.
[ John Friend of The Realist Report interviews German-Canadian activist Alfred Schaefer on his efforts to expose the activities of organized jewry and its ongoing plan of genocide against non-jews, especially Whites. The psychological warfare that is being waged against us by organized jewry is of particular interest to him and how they have programmed us to passively accept our own destruction through the constant use of poisonous ideas and words — KATANA.]
The Realist Report
by John Friend
On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Alfred Schaefer, a courageous activist, thinker, and revisionist who has been persecuted in Germany as a result of his intellectual and political pursuits. In this podcast, we discuss some of Alfred’s recent activities and speaking engagements. We move on to address the persecution of political dissidents and “Holocaust” revisionists throughout Europe, including Horst Mahler, a German revisionist who has fled the country rather than accept yet another prison term, and Ursula Haverbeck, a righteous German woman whose case I detailed in an article published by American Free Press. Alfred gives us his take on fake history, the “Holocaust” industry and the anti-White agenda it advances, and President Donald Trump, who is increasingly disappointing and outright betraying his supporters. This is one podcast you do not want to miss!
John: OK folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report this is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com where you can find an extensive archive of these podcasts as well as other broadcasts I have appeared on over the years on the website. You also find all of my writings and blog posts, an About section, a contact page, where you can find my personal email address, my Twitter feed, which is embedded on the right hand side bar of the website, and lots of other useful and informative links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real newspaper and I also contribute to the Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with American Free Press. Both publications are worth subscribing to and I encourage all listeners to do so. Visit American Free Press dot net and Barnes Review dot org for more details. All right with that said, let me introduce my special guest this evening. Alfred Schaefer is joining us once again. Alfred is quite a courageous activist thinker and revisionist who has been persecuted in Germany as a result of his political and intellectual pursuits. Topics that we will be discussing during this podcast. Alfred, welcome back to the program, sir! How are you this evening?
Alfred:Well, fine John. Thank you very much for having me back online. We’re going into a very critical time now and thanks for having me on.
John: Yes, of course. It has been a while and I’m glad to have you back. This is something that I’ve been wanting to do for a while and we’re finally able to make it happen. And I should say it’s actually morning if I’m not mistaken where you’re at. It’s evening for me, so I guess I probably should have said, “Good morning Alfred”.
Alfred:Yeah, it’s five o’clock in the morning for me right now.
John: Yeah and thanks for getting up and being a champ and doing this. It probably wouldn’t work out any other way, so I do appreciate that. So anyways, we’ve got a lot to talk about and as I mentioned it has been a while since you’ve been on the program, so what have you been up to? How have you been?
[Image] German dissidents persecuted by jewish controlled Germany for daring to speak the truth.
Alfred:Well, we’re working full speed and as you mentioned I’m being persecuted. I had like, … The police had raided our house here back in August and stolen all of my computer equipment and this, … It wasn’t that long ago that I finally, we finally got, you know, through the charge basically. And it really looks like they are looking for a face-saving way to back down from these “thought laws” which are completely unsustainable. Because I am the main accused and alongside myself we Ursula Haverbeck, which is an iconic figure. We have Gerhard Ittner who has served a number of years in prison and was kidnapped from Portugal, brought back to Germany to face charges. And we have Henry Hafenmayer who’s working really hard and doing excellent work, you know, with sending information to all the prosecutors and judges and all the different functions in society. So we’ve got a real “dream team” put together here and it really does look like they’re trying to find, somehow, you know, than A-team to sort of take down these laws. That’s how we’re looking at it. And I’m not in any way fearful, or regret that they came. In fact, this is an opportunity. In fact, we are in times right now where people have to understand that these are fantastic opportunities to take down this construct of lies! And that’s what we’re looking at and that’s how we’re taking it.
[04:58]
John: Good! Yeah, that’s a very productive and positive way to look at your situation. Now you had mentioned that, … So your home was raided. This was back in August of 2016.
Here is the English transcript of a speech given by Horst Mahler on Jan 9, 2017 on the genocidal “mission” that organized jewry is engaged in against non-jews, especially Whites and in particular Germans, and the need to fight back through exposing this diabolical “mission” to all — KATANA.
Of course I’m particularly pleased to be close to Mannheim when being among you because this has a certain meaning. A lot has happened, and there is a completely changed situation. Seven or eight years ago, one could not have imagined this. This means, we should assess the current situation within our possibilities to see where we stand; and I think, we still have a lot to learn. There has been a lot of movement causing many in our circles to be enthusiastic and even euphoric, and they now want to be freed by Trump or Putin.
Movement is good and important but can also go into the wrong direction. Do we have a direction in this movement? The enemy has long prepared for the situation we are suffering today and plays a significant part in the mix of things we see. Perhaps it has not yet really sunk into our consciousness: The war aim No.1, committed to by Stalin and Roosevelt, was the liquidation of the German people through mixing them with masses of peoples of alien cultures. This program has been played out for over 70 years and has now reached a point where one can speculate: Are they so sure of their success that they drop all their respect and masks? Or are they in a panic because they sense that their calculations are not panning out 100 percent?
What’s important for us is that we have our own position in this movement and its development. Much is said about unity, and calls for some kind of actions are plenty, but it’s never clear what is really meant. Are we united, or are there significant differences of opinion in the situation we are in that could lead us into a disaster? I believe we still do not even really comprehend the enemy we are dealing with. This enemy is not only our enemy since 1939 but for hundreds of years. This enemy thinks in view of thousands of years and has a clear vision of his goal. The enemy believes to be striving for this goal by divine order and so is completely free from every scruple and any kind of human stirring. He wants to obey his God. His God says to the Jews:
“I am angered by all the heathen and their masses (that’s their warriors). I will give them up to their slaughter so that their corpses stink up to heaven and the mountains flow with blood.”
It’s not written in a cheap novel; it’s written in the Old Testament. It is an announcement by a major prophet of these people, Isaiah, along the lines of Moses.
I am arguing from the assumption that what is written in the Bible is believed. For only this makes the difference: what people believe moves them, and not whether it developed this way. Their belief moves mountains. And there it says that Moses is commanding this small tribe, the Jews, to exterminate, destroy, and murder, in the true sense of the word, many tribes greater than their own. And then he advises moreover:
“But do not do this too quickly. For if you work it too swiftly, then wild beasts will move in again to occupy the space freed by murdering. Do it slowly and gently!”
And then there is one of their fundamental principles:
“Let these crimes appear as good deeds, and see to it — with all these nasty works I command you to do to the peoples — that no shadow falls upon Yahweh.”
This is the order: Through hypocrisy, lies, and deception, commit the worst crimes with the aim to destroy humanity as a whole, with the exception of the chosen people. This has a very concrete reason. We still don‟t comprehend this! This is not some kind of fantasy or mental illness, but as our German philosophers found out, a world historical development for the Jews; and world history is under the influence of reason for the Jews, as it is for us. But it is a development.
[Here’s the transcript of Horst Mahler’s April 2017 speech prior to his imminent return to prison for “hate speech“, aka, telling the truth about the ongoing genocidal pogrom against Whites by Organized Jewry —
Former lawyer and political activist, Horst Mahler was sentenced to ten years and two months in prison for incitement to racial hatred. He was released after serving seven years because of health problems. A speech given last January in Ludwigshafen caused the authorities to recall Mahler to prison to finish off his sentence. This is possibly the last time he will appear in public. Therefore, his message is both moving and of the utmost importance.
Perhaps this will be the last chance I have to address my fellow Germans.
April 19, 2017, I am scheduled to return to prison to finish my sentence — another three and a half years. I’m 81-years old, awaiting three more charges and it’s always the same inciting racial hatred, this time against Jews. This is therefore an opportunity to remove me definitively from the public sphere and prevent me from coming back into politics once and for all.
I’d like to take the opportunity to provide some information on my own particular situation, and on that which awaits us. The reason why they decided to put me back in prison is for a talk I gave on January 9, 2017 in Ludwigshafen, which apparently shocked and angered the enemy. Now, they are playing a game which the public is as yet completely unaware of.
Initially, I was sentenced to ten years and two months in prison. Having done two thirds of my time and, in accordance with German law, I should have been released on parole. This decision in my favour had been granted by the district judge in Potsdam. In a written official document, he stated that the continuation of my sentence constituted a violation of my human rights. He also added that, firstly, he was concerned about my prosecution for so-called “Holocaust” denial, and, secondly, that this ten-year two-month-long sentence was highly unusual. He compared my punishment with sentences handed to rapists and murderers who receive much lighter sentences. In other words, he showed himself to be honest and rather daring.
However, this decision in my favour has now been overturned by the High Court. As a result, I must now finish the rest of my sentence in detention. In fact, my sentence was interrupted because I was momentarily unfit for prison for health reasons.
This began with the amputation of my left leg below my knee, which now severely limits my mobility, but prior to this, I had been diagnosed with a series of health problems which ultimately led to this amputation. In total, I was diagnosed with 21 different illnesses, including heart failure and kidney problems, etc., and all the doctors declared “He’s unfit for prison.” For us, this became a real struggle, especially for my wife who was very good in persuading the Munich State Procurator to accept that my detention must be halted for health reasons.
